Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-4-78
f ` t ZONE-RECLASSIFICATION 4-7 ~V OR - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION V - ACTION TAKEN ~ C APPROVE y DENY CONTINUE LZNGTH OF CONTINUANCE` J REASONS 1. 2' 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions a~ contained in the Planning Staff's Findingso, Dated ` t ~i ' And subject to the adchtiona` conditions that 1. 2. I 3. V_ Motion ,by Seconded by 19.1 It ni VOTE _ - YES NO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House Spokane, Washington 99260 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, April 21, 1978, at 8:30 A. M. to 12:00 noon, reconvening at 1:40 A.M. to 5:20 p.m. in the Health Building Auditorium, Room 140. The Enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members Present: Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, and the Messrs. Kennedy, Main, Quigley- and Thomas. Planning Staff present: Dayharsh, Sweitzer, Davis, Deysenroth, Fergen, Wesche and justice. Engineer's Office: Finney. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Sincerely, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Ted McCoury, Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh, Director of Planning FLD: kj Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regular hearing held on April 21, 1978. MINUTES OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PIANN?NG COMMISSION HEARING OF APRIL 21, 1978. WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a public meeting on April 21, 1978 to consider the testimony and requests of several applicants, objectors and other interested parties concerning the below referenced zone classifications and other items of business, and WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing all items of business, and WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings and t! e Messrs. Kennedy, Main and Quigley. WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fully considered the testimony given the environmental review. and all other evidence presented, recommends to the Board of County Commissioners the following: 1 o Five Viile Progress Report: Mr. McCoury announced that Mr. Kennedy couldn't participate In the planning of Five Mile because he hadn't attended all of the meetings to Its consideration, Mr. McCoury stated that it was necessary to have another motion by Mr. Quigley for the same request that had been made at the previous hearing. Mr. Quigley had made the motion at the March 30th meeting, seconded by Mr. Kennedy. Mr. McCoury said that only five Commission members had parti- cipated in the plan. The original motion stated, "That the Planning Staff be directed to prepare a final plan for Five Mile based upon the maps and the goals and policies pretty much as developed as per the Citizens Committee from Five Mile and as per the final vote." Mr. Quigley wished to add the following to his motion, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings: That all of the other materials in the alternate plans should-be submitted along with the plan recommended by the Citizens Committee. (Only Plan "D" for Five Mile should be considered to go through the entire process. The other plans should just be submitted as source material.) Messrs. McCoury, Quigley, Thomas and Mrs. Rawlings voted "Aye". Mrs. Byrne voter "No". Messrs. Kennedy and Main abstained from voting. Motion carried. 2. Plannincr Business: a) Report on Commissioners' Actiens john Sweitzer of the Staff presented a Planning Staff review of all items which had been appealed to the Board of County Commissioners - - 1 - ZE-2-78, Tupper request for a zone change from Agricultural to Local Business. This property is located at the northwest corner of Sullivan and Boardway. The Planning Commission recommended denial; however, the Board of County Commissioners reversed the decision and gave their approval to the zoning request on May 23rd, ZN-150-77, proposed by Harlan Douglass, at the northwest corner of Francis and Washington. This proposal was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, and the appeal hearing upheld this decision and gave their approval to the zoning request on May 23rd. ZE-192-77, proposal on North Pines from Local Business to Commercial by Mc C Properties. This zone change proposal was recommended for denial by the Planning Commission, and a decision has not as yet been given by the Board of County Commissioners after their appeal hearing. b) Staff Reports. Mr. Sweitzer reported that the Staff requested a.one month continuance on showing Residential Office Zones which had been approved on North Pines for information and evaluation by the Commission. c) Report from Policy Committee. There had not been a recent meeting of the Policy Committee . Mrs. Byrne suggested a discussion be held on the Policy Committee being ad hoc or a temporary committee and the determination made whether it is necessary to have as a permanent committee and also define the responsibilities of the committee. Mr. Kennedy asked that the Policy Committee be continued. He stated that it should be checked whether or not the member of the Commission has the capability of voting on an issue and who determines whether a person has a conflict of interest. He said this should be decided by Commission members. Mr. Thomas moved, Mr. Kennedy seconded that it be proposed that the Policy Committee be a permanent committee but not meet on a regular basis but only at the direction of the Commission. Mr. Emacio, legal counsel, advised that it would be necessary to amend the By-Laws, advertise the amendment proposed, and take action at the next regular hearing of the Commission. Mr. McCoury suggested that this matter be postponed until the first meeting in May for further consideration of the motion. No vote was taken. The Commission concurred with the postponement. -2- d) Other Business. ZW-26-78, Citizen Request of Change Zoning Map. Mr. Terry M. Thompson requested that the Commission place his proposed zone change from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial on the agenda in May for property located in the area of Russell Road intersecting with Highway No. 2. The Site contains approximately 50 acres and it is planned to have an office - industrial park, Mr. Thompson stated that 30 % of the required property owners' signatures had been obtained on the petition which had been circulation. Mr. Sweitzer informaed the Commission that the West Suburban Compre- hensive Plan designates the area on the edge of the subject property as Restricted Industrial zoning. Mr. Quigley moved, Mr. Main seconded, that Mr. Thompson's request be placed on the Commission's next agenda. Messrs. McCoury, Kennedy Quigley, Thomas and Main voted "Aye". Mrs. Rawlings voted "No". Mrs. Byrne abstained from voting. Motion carried. Mrs. Byrne moved, Mr. Kennedy seconded, that a study or referral be made by the appropriate committee or some action be taken regarding some of the requirements to see if they should not be changed - to be studied and re-evaluated to see if they are still filling the purpose that was that was intended for processing applications. Motion carried unani- mously. ZN-161A-72 Mr. Sweitzer reported thatthe legal description was incorrect on the advertised agenda; the Planning Commission approved one piece of property and the Board approved another. Mr. Main moved, Mr. Thomas seconded, that ZN-161A-72 be placed on the next agenda for the Commission to consider. Motion carried unanimously. e) Ordinance Amendments: Vital Records Center as a Conditional Use in the Agricultural Zone. In order that the language be consistent, 4.04.170 (ii) and 4.24.550, should be "Vital Records Center" instead of "Vital Statistics Center" in the proposed amendments, -3- Mr. Quigley moved to approve the proposed amendment allowing a Vital Records Center as a Conditional Use in the Agricultural Zone. Mr. Thomas moved, Mrs, Byrne moved to amend the motion to amend Paragraph 3-B to read a fifty foot (50) front yard setback instead of the 25 feet listed in the standards. Motion carried unanimously. Mrs. Byrne moved, Mr. Quigley seconded, to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow a Vital Records Center as a Conditional Use Permit in the Agricultural Zone, including the Declaration of Non-Significance for the environmental assessment by the Staff, with the change of fifty (50) feet. Motion carried unanimously. Proposed Deletion of Section 4.06.040 from the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Uses Prohibited - Beauty Parlors in the Two-Family Zone. Mr. Sweitzer stated that the Staff has received three letters requesting deletion of this use as a home occupation. It is necessary to determine whether the beauty parlor is a primary use or a home occupation, Mr. Quigley moved that the proposed amendment be denied. Mrs. Mary Mitchell, East 12819 Semro, spoke in opposition to the proposed amendment. She cited the work done in 1963 through 1965 to obtain the status the way it exists. Mr, and Mrs. Munyan have made the request for the deletion. Mike Senske reported that duplexes are being used for residential pur- poses only and not for commercial uses. He stated that the State of Washington is planning to drop all licensing features for beauty parlors in the near future. Mr. Quigley moved, Mr. Mai n seconded that the proposal. to drop the beauty parlor provision be denied. Mrs. Rawlings moved, Mrs. Byrne seconded, that the motion be amended that the other residential zoned be reviewed for appropriateness of home occupations. Motion carried unanimously as amended, Proposed Conditional Use within Residential Office Zone - Residential Office Accessory Uses Mr. Sweitzer explained that the primary use is office, and the proposed amendment would consider allowing pharmacies, coffee shops, cafeterias, and answering services as an accessory use through the Conditional Use Permit procedure within the Residential Office Zone, It would be anticipated that the accessory use would occupy no more than 10 % of floor area in the Residential Office Zone -4- Mr. Main asked questions regarding the space devoted to this use and also the provision for signing. Mr. Quigley asked that this proposed amendment be considered at a later time and have the Staff prepare alternatives for review by the Commission. Mrs. Byrne suggested that a definition of accessory uses amendment be returned to the Staff for father clarification and placed on a future agenda. Motion carried unanimously. 3. ZE-5-78, TRANSIENT LIVING TO COMMERCIAL: PEARSON, BOYD & LITTLER That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZE-5-78) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, and with the added condition that the zone change be developed in substantial conformance with Plot Plan "D" dated April 13, 1978 and that the application is to conform to the requirements of the District Fire Chief, and that a proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. (Mrs. Rawlings moved Mr. Thomas seconded. Vote was unanimous.) 4. ZE-1-78, AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL: MILLER & BRAINARD CONST. That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZW-1-78) be continued for one month to allow the developer and Staff to ands wer some co ncerns such as: The Health District requirements; screening of the NW corner of the develop- ment; provision for water storage for fire protection; and also an environmental review should be prepared. (Mr. Thomas moved, seconded by Mr. Quigley. ) Vote was unanimousJ 5. ZE-4-78, AGRICULTURAL TO MULUPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: MC QUEEN. That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZE-4-78) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findings, and that a proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. (Mrs. Byrne moved, Mr. Quigley seconded. Vote was unanimous.) 6. ZE-102A-77, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: MC QUEEN. That the change in condition of the zone reclassification request (ZE-102A= 77) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of fact as well as the issuance of a declaration of Non-Significance. (Mr. Thomas moved, Mr. Kennedy seconded. Vote was unanimous.) 7. ZS-37-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: SPO. CO. PLAN. COMM. That the zone reclassification request be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff s Findings as the Planning Commission's findings of Fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, and also that a proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. (Motion by Mrs. Rawlings, Mr. Byrne seconded the motion. Vote was 5 yes, 2 no. Motion carried.) -5- 8. ZE-38-78, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: SPO. CO. PLANNING COMMISSION. That the zone reclassification (File Number ZE-38-78) be denied. ( Motion by Mro Quigley, seconded by Mr. Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.) 9. ZN-39-78, AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL: GRIFFITH. That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZN-39-78) be denied. (Mr. Kennedy moved, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unanimous.) 10. ZE-40A- 73, AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS: SISCO (Continental Oil) That the zone reclassification r-squest (ZE-40A-73) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission's findings of Fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, and also that a proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. (Mr. Thomas moved, seconded by Mr. Quigley. Vote was unanimous.) 11. OSE-4-78, OPEN SPACE LAND: CURTIS. That the open space application (File Number OSE-4-78) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact.. and also that a proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. Mrs. Rawlings, moved, seconded by Mr. Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.) 12. OSE-5-78, OPEN SPACE LAND: WORTH. That the open space application (File Number OSE-5-78) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact, and also that a proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. (Mro Quigley moved, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.) Planning Staff Present: Dayharsh, Sweitzer, Davis, Deysenroth, Fergen, Wesche and Justice. Engineer'.s Office: Finney. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio, DATED THIS 27th DAY OF APRIL, 1978. BY: Kathleen Justice Recording Secretary For: Ted McCoury Planning Commission Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh Director of Planning -6- FINDINGS April 21, 1978 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ZE-4-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: MC QUEEN I. BACKGROUND: On November 18, 1977, the Spokane County Planning Commission recommended approval of ZE-102-77 Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban for a 34,625 square foot parcel located adjacent and to the south of the site in question. The applicant is now proposing to incorporate the 13,850 square foot site in question with the property to the south, the new parcel totaling 48,475 dquare feet. (Applicants are proposing a twenty-one (21) unit apartment complex.) II. SUMMARY: The applicant's proposal is compatible with the land uses to the north, south and west, but could be incompatible with the single family residential uses to the east; is consistent with recent Planning Commission Zone Reclassifications within the area (east of Valley Mission Park); is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan Map; has or-can provide adequate provisions for circulation, sewage disposal, water and fire protection. III. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Existing Land Use - Site Vacant to the north vacant property; I-90 Freeway to the south 3 duplexes; south side of Mission - Duplex, single family residence to the southwest apartment units, 44 units total to the east single family residential uses; duplexes to the west senior citizen center; Valley Mission Park B. Zoning History of Area Request Date Action taken to the north Agricultural 3-24-42 approved to the south Multi Family 9-1E-77 approved Agri. Suburban 4-12-55 approved to the southeast Multi Family 2-17-77 approved Multi Family 2-13-69 approved to the east Agricultural 3-24-42 approved Two Family Residential 10-14-76 approved to the west Agricultural 3-24-42 approved C. Comprehensive Plan Proposal is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan flap. Explanation: The Regional Comprehensive Plan Map indicates the site as being appropriate for residential uses, but no specific residential densities are designated. -3- ZE-4-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Continued) IV. SPECIAL INFORMATION: A. Circulation Frontage Type ADT Mission Ave. Secondary Arterial 39740 Bowdish Rd. Residential access n/a Bates Road Residential access n/a Engineer's Review: The Spokane County Engineer's Office has requested that all access from the site be restricted to Bowdish and/or Bates. B. Sewage Disposal This project is located in an area with soils classified by the Soil Conservation Service as suitable for installation of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The area is, however, located over the Spokane Aquifer. A study is currently under way to determine the degree to which subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent may contaminate the Aquifer. There is very little probability that this project in itself will have more than a slight impact on the Aquifer. However, taken in conjunction with the overall urbanization of the area, some other sewage disposal method will most likely be required in the future. From an environmental health viewpoint the project appears feasible. NOTE: The applicant's revised development plan shows a primary sewage treatment facility; septic tank and large drainfield. C. Water Availability through - Modern Electric Water Company. The District has indicated that it does have the ability to serve the site with water. D. Fire Protection The site is lcoated within Fire District No. 1's boundaries. District representatives have indicated that: Fire plains are not available Fire Hydrants are not available E. Staff Environmental Review Concluded that a declaration on Non-Significance be issued. However, evidence and findings presented at the public hearing concerning this matter should also be considered. The slight adverse impacts noted by the Staff included: earth, air, water, flora, noise, light and glare, land-use, population, transportation, public services and utilities. -3A- ZE-4-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Continued) V. CONDITIONS: The Planning Department Staff feels the following conditions would be appro- priate if the proposal is approved. 1. Dedication of the east ten (10) feet of the advertised property for right of way purposes. 2. Improvement of Bowdish Street and Bates Street along the project peri- meter to Spokane County standards. Improvements shall include curbs, sidewalk drainage control and thirty (30) feet of paving. 3. Access permits for the advertised property shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits for the project. 4. The advertised property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the development plan on file with this application. (Note: The project is the incorporation of ZE-4-78 and ZE-102A-77). 5. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles, shall be maintained in hard surface paving. 6. An on-site-storm drainage system for the project shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office. 7. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main- tenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted for the project prior to release of building permits. 8. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to cover the cost of the required landscaping prior to release of building permits. 9. Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the require- ments of the Spokane Valley Fire Marshal. 10. Sewage disposal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District. 11. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners, resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. -3B- r 71K -L7WA, I SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT r PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2274 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 S'CM.:•NE L:NTY QT HCUSe MEMORANDUM eap ~ a 1) <)JS T O . gb, CO, HF&IM l/ DA16WA) 17Q ,4T=: oWn?. t4040)+ AM: 704 TUSPAS (1) lad c ArrXj: RHYS sr*UAuC "C'IO 3 $VZ01 A)A FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 509-456-2274 Attention: tv Dog V/ S REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Proposed Declaration of Non- significance, Environmental Checklist, etc. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: Z E-- # - ?8 0 Z 6- -10g! -77 The following is explanation for this determination: wA6 19'7 -/t*~ -a2o• Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY OF JURISDICTION, WAC 197-10-040 (4). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advised that the proposal was listed in the SEPA Public Information Center on: .2F y ~B DEPT. FILE REF, " w5 STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the LAN- aIAU a S 7-A;- x' The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action Requested: 99A)S F ~TO Ad j"Q YYI /C.5 90 C Luc o r d0 /v *b. -PoA) 11MOS& JA.) ZE- y- 78 7-6 6W-0Q4& B. Description of Proposal: 64 IR 7, + r uti/TS C. Lo6ation of Proposal: t iLt~r'~?U )3o W D /&4A 9t- ~ATc'S . II . Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: e/,/-) POPQ ti* 77CAl v ~ C/ ~ o ~97~0 ~u 1~ a ~ t v/ L~ t (Over) B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discussion of impacts identified above: /UD J` III. Conclusions and Recommendations: R, Base d on II A, B and C above, the staff Q11~ yy~~~ZLS 7W#r _ "J) &e LA-JQ)4 77VA) 6F "A) 4WZPICANISA~ gf: 00 Sl ?IC REF. # ! Zc`'7s/0 ~•r THRESHOLD DETERMINATION ~ DECLARATION OF U] (prooosed/final) (significance/nonsignificance) C 6r CoA)-DP ex) jA) Zme-14_77 7a . Description of PCOn1Sd1: dY J~'7~1~1 2CY164a) W&UPPVt-V-- _ P,4,*9-,4) - _ o yv1 MT. eOMPlo X of /Y V W173 - 72) ;/vWZZs J4 MA /?&W ARo A4 3y AZT SO ~E21 i d OA)d 2. Proponent: ~a" ~ ~ ~ e4li 3. Contact Person: Phone: 4 • County Action (s) Requested: APPAPY'Al. GF ~ OF 604)bI M A~ ,*VI) Zm& C" ~m&44 1~C To IFS AJA 5. Location of Proposal: 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is oT required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) ; This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and oth=~r information on file with the lead agency. Responsible Official: Final Declaration: t Proposed Declaration: (name) . /9 (name AU. Dig - - - A s' nature (signature) 44. title D) I f? s-r, -1- 0 of (title) X144 de t IV I(~/~ (dept.) QT O. uJ da a (date)d Dapartmnnt Reference No.: ~~Q~•~ (See Reverse Side) $ . For Declarations of Significance Only: Date of Expected Draft EIS Availability (determined by Responsible Official) Date Entered in "EIS in Preparation Registi_• ` (determined by S.,PA Public Information Ccntor) To be completed by responsible official: a. Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading to such declaration: b. Brief explanation of what measures, if any could be taken by the applicant to pre- vent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible re- sulting declaration of nonsignificance: 9. For Eronosed Declarations of Nonsignificance Only: / Date Entered "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance Register" (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) Date comments to be received (15 day review period) (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) 10. SEPA Public Information Center: (For departments of General Government only) ( ) Approved as to form { ) Disapproved as to form Reasons: Signature of SEPA PiC Q-Lfic ,r: Date: (OF-/O;-77 CCD 51'J-Ant COUFITr count ND~Sr ENVIRONMENTAL, CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 2-~v ~S ~ Wit 992 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane C t Wa 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: 4&QT1d&&X 1 (1t, SPAcE Full L',i ye= r _ (c) Change in topography or gt-oun,] 5.i.,!-f re.lio 1C'''. - -i (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? , . . . . . . . . , . (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site ? (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, c, changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . , . . , . , Explanation: Amt&&V. R,!(d-OAV*nnW 4&At'W& k!/!.'G ASP d. Maybe ND 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . . (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, r 'I' 1'r (-}1 T?r,rn jr (-Iim--4 ~~F},n 1: ~1~.,. r~• r-• +ali 3. Water, Will the propc al (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? , (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff ? . . . . . (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration, of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations?. (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate. phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: AO Aft2A=& _ kIll-al- AES"Z RAOA7-~m Ji (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTAMT ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Mtt be No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: Ye S NIT X71 e 10. Risk of Upset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an - - explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . , , , a Explanation: Yes Maybe No 11 . Population, Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of do area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: ~l 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional hour inch ? Explanation: 9, 5, A 4: Yes !vim 13. Trans ortation/circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicul2r movement ? . . . . , (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking ? . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? , (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement: of people and/or goods? . , . . . . . . . _ (e) Alterations to warorborne, rail or air traffic? . . . . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?. Explanation: , r ftftc4T4A P e.. . t - w 1 (IF PACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P::.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the ohstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the p-lblic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? Explanation: Yes Maybe No 20. Archeological/Ilistot-ical. Will the p -oposal result in an alteration of a significant archeologici:l or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E ~::~lanatinn. III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checkli st _ Date: :6 7A p. aT~r; - - (Please P:-int Proponent: Address: Phone: Person completing form: Phone: = -V14~0 Date: Dapt. or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: ?LA40MAX Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: SW 9Tl T Z.~R 117 ~ 17 - 7 - 5POIKA1' C VALLtq FIRE I)CPARTMENT C5^P 4~ &"4 70,& Ao"~ amie 6111 EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 April 17, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Bear Mr. Dayharsh - The following Zone Change ~/ay~\ee~ reviewed for fire protection: ZE-5-78 Pearson, Boyd & ~i tt) erg@ There are \ ~ n this area but hydrants will i be needed. ex ng ' mpins Z 4 ZE- 4- 78 McQueen There arp qci~ti ng a ns in thit area but hydrants will be needed i ZE-102A-77 McQueen Th er, a are ex) s i ntA ~ls IV th i~ ar#a but hydrants will ben ded ZE- 38- 78 Spo. Co. Pl jknni n polsSion Mai. d hydrappe installed, iR this area. Y ~ r V- ZE-40A-73 Si$co ti ►d°~ a 4, ` Mains Ind F it neiR4 $q be jnstQllae -'in\this area. a ~ 1 1 1 \ + y4 ^\0.i 4. oo -t t , 1 1 i C z tdL_, a s Lt of Inspectors AC sn R E C E I V E D APR 18 1 IQ, E SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Date January 9 t 1978- TO Title Company FROM Spokane County Planning Dept. Zone Change ZE=4-?8 Agricultural to Multi le Faml7 Suburban SUBJECT Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of all Property located H Lhin 400 feet and the five nearest property owners of the Property describecr -jelow. all mortgage and loan numbers with addresses, when Also,, please include possible, in order that proper notification may be made . If there ara list more than five owners within the 400 foot boundary, lease furnish closes ownerships. of the owners and taxpayers of record for the five be accepted by this Incomplete or illegible title company lists will not department. Thank you. (Property Description) of Lot 5? and S. 29' of Lot 55-Plnecroft First Addition/ N. 21 I.~.!} E.W.M. Spokane County, Washington. Section 9, Township 25 N., Range ' _ Tom McQueen N. 1815 Hutchinson #12 Spokane, WA 922-0615 f t SPO'UNE COUPITY PLANNING CON1MIg5tti PROi,ER7'Y OWNERS NOTIFIED N LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAKES ON PRO Y - r BY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN OF TITLE (0) AND ADDITION PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) ADDRESS LOTS BLK 0 Wayne E Banaszak Opportunity S 100 ft of W-tt2 B8 (Parcet No T Rainier Mtg 400 5 116187 16541-0230) 0 T 0 Wm F Johnson 0 ortunit SW1 4 Exc ~iZI N 115 ft and Exc S 100 T Fid Mut Sav Bk 1 1 29856 1 f B (Parcel 41 0228) 0 T o A M Courchaine E 11620 Mission Ave 0 Mission Pines B5 6 Exc W 30 ft Ll B2 T Carl W Morgan Parcel No 16541-0129 0 T 0 H B Hull 3 G Mission Pines B5 6 B Parcel No 16541- T Linc Mut Sav Bk 06 0015982 0135 0 T 0 Edwin C Deiter Pinecroft 1st Augusta L4 B2 T Seafirst Mt Cor F103709 2 (Parcel No 09544-0753) 0 T ` 0 James H Johnson Pinecroft lst Augusta L5 B2 Parcel No 09544-0754) T Rainier Mtg_.--- 467 7 116228ABA 0 T (Continued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN OF TITLE (0) AND ADDITION PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) ADDRESS LOTS BLK o Aldon Oster f/(p Pinecroft 1st Augusta L6 B2 9,0 T Linc Mut Sav Bk Ol 0137517 Parcel No 09544-0755) 0 T 0 E 0 Garrison Pinecroft lst Au us a L3 B2 (Parcel No T COMM Mtg 00018851 09544-0752 0 T 0 Eugene J Lauhon Pinecroft 1st Augusta (Parcel No T Bancshares Mtg 1505532 09544-0751 0 T 0 L D McGinnis Pinecroft 1st Augusta_ (Parcel No. T Spo Mtg 0000315 09544-0756) 0 T 0 H M Will ,j Pinecroft lst Augusta LS 3Z (Parcel No T Spo Mtg 0000120 09544-0757) 0 T 0 J E Erlandson (a J~~p Pinecroft 1st Augusta Ll 152 (Parcel No T Col Mtg 146 5 81187 4 09544-0750) 0 T (Continued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 C M Hobbs Pinecroft lst Augusta T Col Mtn 146 813945 3 L4 Bl (Parcel No 09544-0649 O T O C A Anundson Pinecroft lst Augusta L3 B1 (Parcel No 09544 T Bancshares Mt 1708067 -0648 O T O Gerald R Rice 46Aat- S12-16 Pinecroft 1st Au sta 1:7- B arce No. 09544- T Wash Mut Sav Bk 0130231323290 0647) 0 T 0 E R Briley Pinecroft lst Augusta = BI (Parcel No 4- T COMM Mtg 00022683 0646) 0 T 0 C M Breckenridge A Pinecroft 1st B52 Dickerson Pump 61-P (Parcel No 09544-0543) T Irrig Box 2823 0 T o C M Breckenridge Pinecroft 1st N 53 ft B54 Dickerson P:5m- - W arce No. 09544-0545) T & Irrig Box 2823 0 T (Continued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN f ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND AD.URESS 4 LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T 0 C M Breckenridge Pinecroft 1st B49 is erson ump (Parcel No 09544- T Irri Box 2823 0 T 0 C M Breckenri.d i Pinecroft 1st Exc W 10 ft Dickerson Pump and Exc Hwy B48 (Parcel T Irri Box. 2823 No 095 4-OS 9 0 T 0 C M Breckenrid Pinecroft 1st Exc W 10 ft Dic erson ump "40J and Exc Hwy B48 (Parcel T Irri Bos 2823 No 09544-0539 0 T o C M Breckenrid a Pinecroft lst Exc W 10 ft c erson ap- B5 (Parcel No. 09544-0542) T Irrf Box 2823 0 T 0 C Breckenrid a Pinecroft lst Exc W 10 ft Dickerson Pump B53 (Parcel No 09544-0544) T Irrig Box 2823 0 T 0 J B McKinley E 12919 Sanson Ave Pinecroft 1st Add S 29 ft ~~v of Lt 55 andN21ftof T James R McKinley- Lt 57 (Parcel No. 09544- 0573) 0 T (Continued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAKES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 Pinecrof t 1st B86 rce No, 09543-061'9 Red) T Spokane County a, 0 T 0 Pinecroft Is t B92 ---(Parcel o 0 5 3-0 Red) T Spokane County 0 T 0 Pinecrof t 1st B92 (Parcel No. 095430624 Red) T Spokane Count 0 T 0 PinecrQ t 1st B89 (Parcel No. 095430621 Red) T Spokane Count 0 T 0 Plmec=ft B98 (Parcel No 09543-0643 Red) T Spokane County 0 T t _f, 0 Marilyn Toroni J214v_~`, Pinecro t is t Add-W 80 7 ft gq~.o6 of S 150 ft of B59 T Comm Mtn Pa ce o 09544-056Z) 0 T (Continued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAKES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN OF TITLE (0) AND ADDITION PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) ADDRESS LOTS BLK 0 L D LaLone Pinecroft lst Add N 110 ft of 260 ft of Trs 59- T Sea lst Nat Bk S & 12074 _ 60 and 61 -(ParC@l No, 09544-0578) 0 T 0 Ben Schmidt Pinecroft lst Add ,N 317 ft of Trs 59-60 and 61 T Pac 1st Fed S & L ft o 13 125830 2 Parcel No 09544-0579) 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T (Continued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY Spokane County Code Number: ZE-4-7 Owners and Persons within 400 feet. Application is for a Zone Change from AS c 31 t„ral to j t, p e F m, l v Suburhan Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following last of names and addresses consisting of this and the following . pages has been prepared from the latest available records and i.s to the best of my knowledge correct. For Transamerica Title Insurance Co Signed by Ex-;ez, h A- ;-,.A 009 Title Company Date February 2, 1978 LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0! Louis E Johnson 9 149 22'-of Blk T Great NW Federal S & P 09-035-25742-7 Exc South 559 45 0 T 09544-0539 <47i ~e NECROPT 1ST 0 C M Breckenridge Exc West 10' ox Z8 3 xc Hwy B48 T Dickerson Pump & Ir g Spokane, WN 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T` 0 MMMMWMMMM~ T (Continued on next page LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAKES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) O Louis E Johnson 0 ortunit W 94 ft of E24322ft ofBlk9 T Grt NW Fed S & L 09 035 25743 5 _..Mr.. 74 ft. (Parcel No. 16542-0240) 0 T 0 Louis E Johnson 0 ortunit ft of Blk 9 Exc S 559.45 T Grt NW Fed S & L 09 035 25742 7 ft-LUXrpj Ng---16542-0239) 0 T 0 Louis E Johnson 0 ortunit E 149,22--,ft of Blk 9 Exc N 94 45 ft T Grt NW Fed S & L 09 035 25744 3 & Exc S 470 ft (Pgrcel-- No 16542-0241) 0 T 0 Rudolph J Puhek N1507 Bowdish Rd 0 ortunit B9N 120 t of S 70 ft Exc W 400 ft T Rudolph J Puhek Parcel No. 16542-021D 0 T o ennett nc 0 A J Wolff :~;:P_Box 14729 Vail Sub Ptn B9 0 L1 Bl (Parcel No 16542-1501 T Alvin J Wolff 0 T 0 D J Rider E 11516 Mission Ave Opportunity N 110 ft of W1/2 of B1k 8 Exc E 200 T Douglas J Rider ft a d No 16541-0240) 0 T (Continued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 D J Rider E 11516 Mission Ave ort it N 200 ft of W1/2 qF Blk 8 T Dou las J Rider/3- Exc E 200 f~ and Exc St (Parcel No 16541-0241) 0 T 0 D J Rider E 11516 Mission Ave 0 ortunit P of W 100 ft of E 200 ft of T Douglas J Rider N 200 f of el No 16541-0224) 0 T 0 G W Anderson E 11522 Mission Ave 2Rportunity E 100 ft of N 200 ft of W1/2 B8 T George W Anderson Parcel No 16541-02251 0 T 0 D A Waller E 10405 Balfour Ct Opportunity Pt of B 3/4 'p o N2/5 of N1/2 Exc W 416 4 T Darroll A Waller~~, ft Parcel No 165A1-0 32) 0 T 0 Mary L Canning S 1212 Wall 0 ortunit Ptn of B5 4Sza y Exc platted ptn and T Mary L Canning Exc. S 30 ft of N 160 ft o W 400 t and Exc E 253 6 0 ftl NofS100ftand xc S 10 t o E 250 f t T (Parcel No. 16541-0233 0 T 'L Larson E 10405 Balfour Ct Opportunity Ptn of B5 --K 77 t o N2/5 of N1/2 T oll A Waller of W 416 4 ft Parcel o(Con inu a on3 xt age) ZE-4-78 In the matter of a hearing to consider Changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban on the property described as the N 21 feet of Lot 57 and the S 29 feet of Lot 55, Pinecroft First Addition in Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44 E.W.M. (East of Bowdish Road and approximately 120 feet north of Mission Avenue.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ;)a ~A - , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the ~oL***- day of 19.,,, I personalty posted one (1) or more true and c rrect copies of 'tie hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING in a conspicuous manner at each of the following locations, to-wLt: 1. -IF 1: P L 2, • p• , It . 3. DATED THIS DAY OF I9 'y SIGNED Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of 19 • Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane, Washingto: R ECEIVED '.s'A~o"L / MAR 2 8 1978 COUNTY PLANNINGSPOK ANE DEPARTMENT ooft ;lead. t4 A, 11~4 t*404amCA" WVJU, - ""WA woo""" 7&;/ A t7 WIA 1 o~~H E~fcr "Serving the OPPORTUNITY AREA for Over 60 Years" ~o o_ 9i Telephone 928-4540 ~p~`, Box 14008 - Opportunity Branch Spokane, Wmhhgpm M14 C0M March 27, 1978 Spokane Planning Commission N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 RE Pinecroft First Addition Gentlemen This is to inform you that the utility easement on the south 29 feet of lot 55 and north 21 feet of Lot 57 of Pinecrof t First Additon, is acceptable to the Modern Electric Water Company The company does not now have, nor does it plan to have in the future, any irrigation facilities on this property as granted by the Contract of 1905 on file at the Spokane County Courthouse Sincerely, Wm S teat4hhteerstonne Manager WSF/ms R E C EI E MAR 2 81978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT s APPLICATION FOR, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCU 91ISSION ZONING HEARING Public Works Building, N 811 Jefferson Spbkane, Washington 99c.01 Date: January _9, 197$ Application Nod ZE-4-78 Name of Applicant: Tom McQueen Street Address: N 1815 Hutchinson #12 City: Spokane State: WA Telephone No.922-0615 Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural Date Existing Zone Classification Established: _ 4/24/42 Proposed Zone Classification: Multiple Family Suburban Proposed Use of Property: Multiple Family units Legal Description of Property: N 21 ft L 57 and S 29 ft L55 Pinecroft 1 st Addn Site Size: approx 13,850 sq ft Section: 9 Township: 25 Range: 44 Street Address of Property: Adjacent to 11500 Block fo Mission Who Holds Title to the Property: nro„+ ~r,.u, on If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Purchase and Sale Agreement signed by Title holder ana e Furnish a letter from a Title Inprance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed concNtions which are alledged to warrant other or additional zoning? i eed for adequate housing _F 2. What fact justify the proposed zone reclassification basse4 on the advancement of the public health, safety, and general welfare? 4 Need for adequate housing o What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the value and character of adjacent property? The values of the adjacent properties will be enhanced 4o Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? No A plot plan or sketch must be attached containing the following information: (a) Scale of the drawing. (b) North Point. (c) All dimensions of property, existing buildings, and proposed buildings. (d) Location of all existing and proposed buildings, or additions, with dimensions to the nearest property line. (e) Off-street parking area. (f) Defined points of access and egress. (g) Date of the drawing. THE NECESSARY FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION. The recommendation of the Planning Commission in this matter will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for final action. Any person desiring to contest the recommendation of the Planning Commission must request, in writing, a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners no later than (10) days following the date of the public hearing held by the Planning Commission. c ~r (Signed) ff, ►sf~ I M tz 10101, a 36 ' + so -1 4 ! - It 3y~ 33s 3 ~1 74 I ! ~ ~ ' f 1 ' .3.~rf 2 7 11 C If,, 79 0 80 J 0 MA 45 0 OO ~ 1 8'6 --w #Avf s59 6061 z .1 cc 94 j9ff 95Q 4 3 to ~r of Nji. 97 * V-9. s r'/~70 I !o^ ~ b r f ~ 14 t 14 ilk. Y ! Y- " AD ~ IT ~7 ~ ~i4 ~ ~ 2,27 ~T Y 9 4 f a afaw AIPA# 409 8 OOWoe 714- 60 Tre to • O- TO.., Il L iF Fr% 7 1 s A~~ Odr4hvlw f u .r' McQUEEN REALTY, INC. A Real Estate Investment Company E. 9212 MONTGOMERY #104 • SPOKANE, WA 99206 TEL. (509) 922-0615 A • • • 4440 t .P y r` f • FAGS" ► DATE: May 19 , 1977 ZE-102-77 Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Gentlemen: W undersigned property owners, request the Spokane County Planning Commission or (to consider changing the zoning map) from AGRICULTURAL to MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN on the following described property: South 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft First Addition, Section 9, Township 25 N . , Range 44, E.W. M . , Spokane County, WA NAME ADDRE SS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF-PROPERTY " C. A r O9 01 -osyV /3L4 s 3 exc-~Or W. 10 t. C)ySyy - 0! ;.13 K-r Sy. ,ec~ Sy 0 1 tip, O 454 4- 0s yes 225- j6g -vs L Q~ IC W• ~0 of FYq r 071 c) ws~~ off'' 0 0 619 10-7 //Z, 0 S~~t Io r SI<-- 0 vsy y - 07TY e 9~ yy r o7SS ada; `v r 6 B~K- a k2ktia- &AIL pp, y - z i S. 02'9 o Lr rT /y .2 of it r r7 A, S-y,2 - v 1 LOT ~ 8c K. ~ 15,01 y II/. '7 1* 7 I D9Sy4 - o(:~Q' 8 oGsyr- 036 9. r 4 2 10, V . l Z v' o S '7 v x [gyp r /tSb1t#Vs Do ~wt(4 Aof At k f, r n/ ~ L i t /s L /L a]~ 13 i 144, pys~ry -v'7S~ f I _ ~ ~ r !r r 1`J •Ir 1 PA DATE: May 19 , 19 77 ZE- 102-77 Sp,.)kane County Planning r)i,p-itin. ;kI N• rth 811 Jefferson Spokane, VVA 99201 GE.. -itle mt. n undersigned property ownors, request the Spokane County Planning COMMLSSL011 or (to consider cnanying the zoning map) from _ AGRICULTURAL to ___MULTIPLE FAMILY SLTOUR N on the following described property: South 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft First Addition, Section 9, Township 25 N . , Range 44, E. W . M . , Spokane County, WA VAN E A 'LURE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF')- ROPERTY /6 5,4 0. - D-23 -2- C. A 14 )-47 044," llaee T ro le, ~ca.4 air- 9 exc. -S `/70 Al SIC l1 1 131 /b~yi- oz~fo Al. 110' FLJ y o & ewcl f2x)*ejfc S -vj D:A4/ S. qv' of Al .,200' o~= w. JZ cf &K GEC t o' ¢8 .t w yy of B~K sl %bs~/- o12i1 wJ. /Do' of e .20o k Al l ' /b S"// _0-z2_ l t QQ a /00 04:Aj. Zoo 7L p 12- r w 3u L c r K. iZ t- /6 S#1 - o 131 K.or Q rye- W. 7.a' A 1144b ~ N / 0 9 sal 4- o S 7 8 i S c26n OF wr / 6 0•= i vAc T s 71 6 77 ~ I 7 - 1 ~ r i 8 9 10 I 4 I 11 12 i 13. _ 14, 15 ' DATE January 9. 1978 ZE-4-78 Spokane County Plannilic, ~oIrlriJ s sio.: `;ounty Court House Spokane, vi asilisi;ton 2 U 1 ~:~:lztlen~~.~. tiie undersigned property oviaers, request the Spokane t:ounty Plannin,., Commission (to consider a zoning plan) or (to consider cihanying the Sonia map) from Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban on the followiii~, described propperty:N 21' of Lot 57 and S 29' of Lot 55 Pinecrof t First Addition. Section 9. Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. Spokane, Country, Washington.. N AviE ADDRE SS LLGAL DESCRIPTION.OF PROPERTY . ' IMCCAVPT /Ir P~ ~`r o 3 ~o0e4AorT 1 Sr 0J SJ FT 8 Sy f! ~t R By 1 .V Wii,e~0a TT ~f a w- Nwy 9, S~, S AAIFCAor7 s r irc w, I p' B sj . OINVI47VAI17Y N /I v •r. w yk- op ILL S l 4F IC eo 2eo APrIr Amo r'xc or &P0047rA/I*Y J. !o C7 01= Aje 2,e0 , e~= w ~/s or. acK t txc E. z.oo Pr Awo AP 000tT-vh*Y .0T a'-- 8 a.J va Pr oft, ar Zoo f r FT 60 ow I OF DAwRrvAI)Ty R-.-pa Fr e.- Al. zoc Kr v4l, 1,E 1/5-M 7)Z;.,,,;, .F w VL I ~G '1iu ~rn1 t~CR ►7F7 / ST 4,)& 0r-,r4 C.M . hb AkcE. C. s¢ o9svq -ob 41 . ~.s pi Nk-+c~eo Fr sr Aueo.If 7p L g _ ZI, f /I11/EL' SDP T I I T' Aoow 110 PT - L b ~i1/D 61 OF Zbo Fr Pr- 'r&S• J9 6 . AMUf L, NO. o,syy -0s08 l 0 - PINrr'C~iV~- r c 7 A 0660174 IX 6 2 oAo9ttTUN/7Y B rJ N "'r O1 s pwaet No. 146-V?- - o 2-3S' Al IPIr,, y 1G. 11. 1G. is 1 15. 1 DATL . s nuary 9. 1978 ZE-4-78 Spokane County Planniiic, Coinmissio:: ~;ounty Court :louse Spokane, "vv ashiajton 2 U 1 Gentleman. vv e , the undersigned property ow~le cs , request the Spokane County Planning Commissio:i (to consider a zonin~D plan) or (to consider chan.,ing the ::oniag map) from Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban on the followia, described ?roperty-N 21 of Lot 5? and S 29 of Lot 55 Pinecroft First Addition. Section . Townhip 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. Spokane, County, Washington.. N-1AME 1)ltES8 LEGAL' DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY . s ~ ~ ~ ' / 9.t2 ~r oa Bt~C 9 o~rr~er~~r,cY ewe_ X. JTV. ox ' 4 A; 2,AMZzP r L~' G 4(7-o- r oPPat~r~/iTY /~Fqq.t2 fir' D~= at*. 9 kxc, O roM r E. , 2L AAL 9 477 A( 9 JF• gr fr 4mAo irrc Z. 4( '!a Fr. 4. 6, V. 8. 1G. 11. ~ 1L. 1 1 Ib DATE_ uar 13 2.8 ZE-4-78 Spokane County Planniag Commissio:: ~:ounty Court :louse Spokane, vv ashiajton 201 Gentlemea. vrc, tite uiidersiyned property ovri:ers, reque st the Spokane County Planning Commission (to consider a zoning plan) or (to consider changing the ::oniag mall) from Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban on the followiai,, described property:N 21' of Lot 57 and S 29' of Lot 55 Pinecrof First Addition. Section 9. Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. Spokane, County, Washington.. IyAMz: ADDR. SS Li,GAL; DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY . Jet- 1 ..3 5 . 3• ~~ME3 /fAeOI J 7 6. c2 • y 10. A, tip 11 Z- ~Y• _r 1 lc i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,4y~ ,,f~. At Bald time and place any Interested person may appear for, or against, the grantfn~► of ~ this appllcatlon. ~ AGENDA, APRIL 21, 197$ TELEPHONE NC,: ~'S5-22i~' t~ SPt~RANE COUNTY PLANNING C©MMISSION Time:' Friday, April 21, 1978, 9:30 a.m, P'aCe: Spokane County Health District Audttoriurn, ~,oQm 140, West 11rJ1 College Z~QNE CLASSIFICATIQN 3, ZE-4-78 A rlcultural to Multi le Fam11 Suburban a. Location: Seaton 9, Township 25 N., Range 44, r,"~'.M, r The N 21 feet of Lot 57 and the S 2g fee} of Lot 55, Plnecroft First Addition. b, Applicant: Tom McQueen North 1815 Hutchinson, No, 12 Spokane, WA c. Site Size; approximately 13, $50 Square feet d, Existing Zoning; Agricultural, established Agri? ~4, 1942 e, Proposed Zaning: Multiple Family Suburban f. Proposed tTse of Property: Multiple family units g, Application of Zoning Prov±sion; Chapter 4,21, Section 4.21,~J40 h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing maybe whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse envlronrr?ental _ - Impact I_ E~ ~9b9 ~ t - - F~ - iiv rrc ~ - oq } M ~ hA~~ ~1 A N ti 0 N w ~ :may, , ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ - 1~4DIAP1~► IR~l~l.l III - ~ ~ ~iEltr U~. i r 3 90 7 ~I ° ~ tioq.u E~e~~~ i ~ r~rx t ~ M ',fvELL S~Ntp ? ~ ~ ,...,x , ~ FORi+I Bd6 PLNG. ~ _ f r J f I ~ "~j ~ ~ f ~ ~ j 4 ~ ~j r r r~ - ~ ~ It t ~l ~~F a y ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ r T i t i t ~ Q 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 p~ r:R. r~ •;~,w ico roo o - - - - - - p. _ 4~, ~ ~ ~ y~, ~ ;fir 7 drt,~a ,~i ~ 4 ~ q I - ~ - s ~ c 1 ~ .t~ .NII ~irf~' ~ ~ v ._.j. - - . ~ - - _ _ .._A_,. _ . _ - . ~ ~ - - - - r_ _ ~ 40 ~ off. ~~n .i ~ ~j~ / ,0~~93' ~;~8 ! ~ ~ IDj ? 14 r,~, i ~ ~ _ ~ ~ t _ ~l ~ ~ ~ tJ 4 ~ ~ ~j ~ + ~ - N ~ ~i~1~,~~, Ort~' v~~ $ ~ d~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ is ~a l~.e. f ~ 1 (/~j~Ir.~r ' T 4/r~iiT\\ Jri/l7/1 INr~L ~ ~ l~"~ !7'l. V / ~ fry ~ ~ s u i[66] /07 r ~ T l I L~