The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-6-78 REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS 1. Z Z &2 t, 2~~ Requester's Name (Please Print) 2. - ~,Iul,-'*7' - Requester's O ganization - if applicable 3. k13 "z~ fs Requester's Mailing Address (Please Include Zip Code) Date of Request Time of Day Requester's Phone Number 5. Nature of Request: ~Q 2a c 6. Document(s) Reference Identification from Public Records Index: 7. Description of Document(s) Requested If Not Identifiable by Reference to Board of County Commissioners of Spokane 'EaZ4 4- A, County Public Records Index: i r 8. If the requested documents are/or include a list of individuals or companies, state the purpose for which the list is intended and sign the following acknowledgment: I promise that the list of individuals or firms furnished hereunder will not be used for commercial purposes. Purpose: PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE AGENCY ARE PROVIDED FOR INSPECTION AND COPYING SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING REGULATIONS: (1) No person shall knowingly alter, deface, or destroy public records of the agency. (2) . Original copies of public records to the agency shall not be removed from the offices of the agency. (3) Care and safekeeping of public records of the agency, furnished pursuant to a request for inspection or copying, shall be the sole responsibility of the requester. (4) Records furnished for public inspection or copying shall be returned in good condition and in the same file sequence or organization as when furnished. (5) Boisterous or otherwise disruptive conduct by those requesting public ords of the agency shall not b rn hied. (6) The charge for providing copies of public cords is fifteen er 8'/z 1 or 8' b 1 c ge R u s Signature OFFICE USE ONLY Records provided by: Records returned in good condition: Yes/No (initials) Comments: No. of Copies Made: Amount Received: Receipt No.: Received by: F:=MWT R"aNG KMTn FOM"w M&Km\M.QUW POR PUBLIC RFWMX OWI).a~ i J r~ f ~ r .F ry • 1 006 - , ~ 1'' to , - ? • ~ - W W II~~ _ a : ! ~r ~ is ~ ` ~ - 9Z2 zC00i a ~•v. AV A~J- r, 141- .41 awftlp- 4wp► J~ r ~ ` ~ • s a -b-_ ` All f At 44 10" 0 i f' ri A& AMI..JLL low VNITA .m IPPIL AAAA.Am w _ I 147 ~ r - ;ice. ,Al-•~ 0 r I l r 1 AMW .t*. le woompl. ♦ _ • •r " y ri r, J'•'...' jet.' ~ r,~K ~ I ~J+ 40 ti v • oil r ~ ar•7..~1~y. MOW o f z - ld :C7f► - - t - s.. _ i ~4 ' . , z'y-"~.~2~G 37►.~~"•~~~~ ' -'~~7~ • - i ~ I - •eC~rr....~ L - --+w~_ "•~.r .tArra ~ tom- - ~ ~.r. low dip- _a - -4'~ - .~3+~IT,, ,~v~r:~~R i• - - ~ - 'fi'r a ~ 1a is • ~'1, •~rY• ; ~ ~ _ ~ " _ • k' ~ f, • `~,p . Via: a , 1 ~ ~ _ ,r,' r t ~ F's• t f f.~. - ma'r' ~ irk ' ~ • , . ~ . ,,}}yy - s. .yam A " ~ I i • lptl& 901W lop 1~ 31~ ''^y' ray 40 E Al 7 W, "PW le - ok" it 1 • r - *004 Imo. ~ ~ i 1 CAL ~~u ` ► IL 1 A,► Oki I 1 r. jp~ r • ; ei _ _ ~ \ 'tip'- ; • ~ ^ } ~ + top J" ti I - -ilk . 7 . pry pq, rte: G~ / Irj7 "og %i u WAIVER OF SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH BOARD OF SPOKT," COUNTY COVITITSSTONERS' PESO[ JlTION P,2-O458 DA,TFD r1nY 4, 19° 'The undersigned Applicants/Sponsors for Application # Z,E - - hereby acknowledge(s) that we are aware of the provisions of RC14 43.21C.080 concerning the filing of Notice of Action under the State Environmental Policy Act in conjunction with the approved application. It is further understood by the undersigned that by our not filing a Notice of Action as required by P CW 43/21C.080, the Declaration of Non-Significance remains appealable. The undersigned further acknowledge(s) that they have been advised that Spokane County will not be filing the Notice of Action for the above-referenced application under RCW 43.21C.080. ENTERED THIS 7 DAY OF rrmr4 y , 19_4r</_ , BY (applicant) .00 ADDRESS y~ ~lyT~V C:r vV N 7 Spokane LOUHL P-1ar1r1i11y ~epai,ble;-.` S PIC REF. ' THRESHOLD DETERMINATIOsY X. r/A) 'ev DECLARATION OF 'ul (proposed/final) id (s ignif icance/non s ignif icance) 1 . Description of Proposal: C ~ 4 W ~ ' L~=GLBztiC~f l 2. Proponent: ~ - 3 . Contact Person: / Phone: LQ` y-1a 3 4. County Action(s) Requested: 5. Location of Proposal: Sto t02M--V-/t e4 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is A)a7- required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c) This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental check-list and oth- r information on file with the lead agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declarati n: Final Declaration: (name) (name) 14 !2 AJ si nature si nature - - r (title) -D, Rez:761Y J (title) M411?1k4.* (dept.) A~ (dept.) f~ & - date da r ' tg) Dapartn:r:nt Reference No.: 2~--~ -7 (See Reverse Side) July 26, 1979 Liz Poulson Pacific First Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n East 12005 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 Dear Liz: Re: Landscape Bond for Mr. Lloyd Lynch - #13--1-150723--2 As stated in the conditions of zone reclassification ZE-6--78, a specific landscape plan and accompanying bond were required for development of the subject property. I have reviewed the site and have determined that the landscaping requirements have been fulfilled. Therefore, I request that you now release the bond held under loan number #13--1-150723-2. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, KENNETH E. KIRSCH Associate Planner KEK: cmw ASSIGMIENT AGREEMENT For valuable consideration, I, Lloyd Lynch, residing at South 1405 Woodward Spokane, Washington, hereby sell, assign, transfer and set over to Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, officing at West 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99201, 4 s4g1 3. SO Dollars of the sums being held by Pacific 1st Federal S&L Loan Company under '#13-1-150723-2 loan number, and further authorizes the loan company to pay over to Spokane County the above sum in the event the undersigned does not comply with Condition No. L t 7 of Zone Change Ido. -7$ attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by reference. The loan company shall retain said sum of money until Spokane County shall in writing authorize the release of said money. This assignment is authorization notice to the loan company of this assignment and direct authorization. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this assignment this 19 day of June , 1978. ACCEPTED: C , Loan Officer Pacific lst Federal Savings and Loan Assn. NO a 78 306 IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZONING MAP ) FROM AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL ) ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 9, ) RESOLUTION TOWNSHIP 25 N., RANGE 44, E oW a M o, ) SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ) The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hearing on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that thb said Planning Commission concurrs In the plan to zone the following described property as: RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44, E,W.M., Spokane County, Washington. That portion of Tracts 16, 17, and 18 of Pinecroft First Addition according to plat recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, page 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying Sly of the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nly of the following described line a Beginning at a point on the W line of Wilbur Road 150 feet, measured along said line, N of the SE corner of said Tract 18; thence W along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts 16, 17 and 18 to a point of the W line of said Tract 16. NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED, that the above-described property be, and the same is zoned under the classification of RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended. AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that any development on the above-described property shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) Access permits for the project area shall be abtained from the Spokaz e County Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits. NOTE: Access points must meet the approval of the Spokane County Engineer's Office 2) Access points shall be delineated and paved to Spokane County Standards. 3) The advertised property shall be developed in substaintial conformance with the development plan on file with this application. 4) Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving 5) An on-site, storm-drainage system for the project shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office 6) A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted for / the project prior to release of building permits. 7) The applicant shall provide a-_performance_bond to cover the cost of the required landscaping prior to release of building permits. 8) Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane Valley Fire Marshal. 9) Sewage Disposal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District. 10) Annexation to a public water service entity. - 1 - O O e t 11) That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43o21c,080 RCVv and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF , 1978 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Hk~ V1 ANY ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND erk of Board By: ' This is to certify that this i a true I 1'~ ~ and ect co y of Resolution No 0 15----3 fi,- passed by the B this day of 1 78 0 By: V&Oa4;~~ - 0 eputy I hereby certify that I have posted the above changes and revisions on the Zoning Map in the Building Codes Department, and do further certify that the zone classification change is the same as described above and shwon on the attached map. SIGNED: DATED: -2 - ,ONE CHANGES POSTED ON ZC IG MAPS Application No. T9 Res. No.74. 3p Res. Date Qr9 7 From: Acale- ry tt i_ To: 'RartTjeIGT =N usrp►A Posted By:- Date Posted: Acres: Sec. Two. Range 4/y EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' , -~t (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' [~l (Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' (File Map) Tracing 434 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' PA (File Map) Metro X11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' Nei (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile N (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (Wa'_1_ Map) Front _")ffice Scale: ' - 1000' (N X11 Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1 " - 400' (Fi lA Map) Tracinc 434 (Soi th East Zoning Maps) Scale: 1000" .-(File Map) Metre X11 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' (F-.!e Map) County-Front Office Scale: I" - 1 mile (File Map) Count% (Map Room) Scale: 1 " - 2 miles (Score Cards) Middle Office r SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION North 811 Jefferson Spokane, 'Washington 99201 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court Hcuse Spokane, 'Washington 99201 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, February 17, 1978, at 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 Noon, reconvening at 1:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in the Health Building Auditorium, Room 140. The enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, ar.r: Messrs. Main and Thomas. Planning Staff present: Dayharsh, Davis. Sweitzer, Wesche and justice. Engineer's Office: Finney. Prosecu'.:,-' ~ C-.-~~:ce: Emacio. Mrs. Rawlings abstained from participating in the dlscusslcr-. --,r vc'...-_j; on ZN-166-77 due to a possible conflict of Interest. Mr. Main abstained fro."n participating In the discussion or voting on Items ZE-2-78 and ZE-6-78 dus to a possible conflict of intereet. Sincerely, SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN'jNG CO WAISSION Ted MCC iu y, Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh, Director of Planning FLD:kj Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regular hearing held on February 17, 1978. MINUTES OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION HARING OF FEBRUARY 17, 1978. WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a public meeting on February 17, 1978 to consider the testimony and requests of several applicants, objectors and other interested parties concerning the below referenced zone reclassifications and other items of business, and WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing all items of business, and WHEREAS, Mr. NicCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings and Messrs. Main and Thomas were in attendance and constituted a quorum, and WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fully considered the testimony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recommends to the Board of County Commissioners the following: 1. Proposed Amendment to the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance Regards'-' Tot Frontage in the Agricultural Zone. The Board of County Commissior~::--s -'.':--cted a request to the Planning Department to prepare a proposed amendri:=.:,i: t the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, Title IV4 -;to increase the lot frcnt3ge for residential building sites to 100 feet in the Agricultural Zone. The Staff prepared an amendment in compliance with the request, adding the p;c,'; `ston that duplexes which are a Conditional Use In the Agricultural &-.Nre at the present time, have a frontage requirement increased also. Mrs. Rawlings moved, Iv.'.-..r. Main seconded, that the following proposed Amendments be recommended for approval to the Board of County Commissioners Motion carried unanimously. a) Amend Section 4.04.040 - Uses Permitted 7, 000 square feet and 65 feet frontage to read as follows: Section 4.04.040 - Uses Permitted 10, 000 square feet and 100 feet frontage. b) Amend Section 4.24.540-b-(1) - Minimum Lot Size: 11,000 square feet and 90 feet of frontage on a public road to re,1 as follows: Section 4.24.540-b- (1) - Minimum lot size: 11, ^CO square feet and 100 feet frontage. The Staff was directed to make recommendations regarding minimum road frontage for the other appropriate zones, and it was li'-ped that this presenta- tion would be available for the next meeting of the P~ `.:.cy -1- 2, Re ort of the Polio Committee; a) Change in-By-Laws The Policy Committee recommended that an amend- ment be made to the Spokane County Planning Commission's By-Laws by adding a section, "Procedures for Reviewing Platting and Zoning" . This addition would be added after the Section on "Committees". The procedures would consider long-range planning, zoning, and platting r 3 ll(;;a a s illu k:yu, rirlm-[ S C ~'rpt~ the proposal of the Policy Committee to change the By-Laws, Motion carried unanimously. b) Findin s and Facts for Agendas for Planning Commission Hearings In cooperation with the Staff, the Policy Committee recommended that the Findings and Facts prepared for agenda items for consideration by the Planning Commission be made ava[iahle to the members seven (7) days prior to the public hearing. Mr. Thomas moved, Mr. Main seconded, that the procedure be followed to give the Planning Commission the requested information per*Z.{ntng to agenda items at least seven (7) days prier to the public hearing, Motion carried unanimously. c) SEPP Procedures. The Policy Committee recommended that the Puna cl Commission have a briefing ofi SEPA procedures, Including court cases, making significant and non-significant decisions, etc. The Planning Director and Deputy Prosecuting Attorney were directed to coordinate efforts for this presentation. 3, Citizen Paricipation and Update of the Comprehensive Plan. Gary Fergen of the Staff gave a brief summary of efforts being made to inform various citizen groups by presenting current ! rformation regardtng the update of the Corrprehen;sNe Plan and citizen par*.u pation. . The "Operation Insight" flyer is planned for publication monthly, giving up to date information for the calendar of forthcoming meetings and a synopsis of current points of interest. The Staff has been requested to make presentations as result of the distribution of the flyer to the complied mailing list. A lifestyle quebtionnaire has. been sent out as well as a. suitability lifesvyld - questionnaire. Results of these mailings are still being received by the Staff. The Staff is working in cooperation with a workshop session being held at SFCC in conjunction with comprehen s ive planning and wi' i make a presentation during one of the evening sessions, This is a slide presen.'ation. 4. Preparation of Suitability Maps,._ john Nunnery of the Staff explained about the status of designing suitability maps, with land use maps to be printed at a later date 2 AIF He suggested that draft policies be developed by working with the Coordina- ting Committee and the Advisory Councils. It was estimated that Staff alterna- tive sketches would be prepared by early- Spring. Mr. McCoury, Chairman, suggested that the Coordinating Committee and the Planning Commission should meet together with regard to the suitability draft list of policies which wiill be considered. Mr. McCoury and Mr. Nunnery will meet to work on a plan for this consideration. 5. ZN-166-77, AGRICULTURAL TO MANUFACTURING: KAISER ALUMINUM That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZN-166-77) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, and with the added condition that the applicant and Spokane County shall enter into a contractual agreement restricting the uses permitted within the proposed 500 foot buffer area to a fbliage open-space buffer, no structure permitted, and that a proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. (Mr. Main moved, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unanimous.) 6. ZN-150-77, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO (COMMERCIAL: DOUGLASS. That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZN-150-77) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission's Finding of Fact with the following exceptions: Deny Lot 17 and the South 1/2 of Lot 16; also eliminate the phrase'is inconsistent with recent Planning Commission Zone reclassifications'found on page 2 paragraph 2; with the added conditions that prior to release of building permits sewage disposal and water service shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District, and that a five (5) foot concrete sidewalk be placed on Francis and Washington as requested by the Spokane County Engineer's Office. and also that a proposed declaration of non-significance be issued. (Mr. Main moved, Mr. Thomas seconded. Vote was 4 to 1.) 7. ZE-186_ 77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO_RESIDENTIAL OFFICE Mc C Prop- erties. That the zone reclassification re-! csc (File Number ZE-166-77) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the u;:-_ff's Findings as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact, and also that a proposed declaration of non-significance be issued. (Mrs. Byrne moved, Seconded by Mr. Thomas Vote was unanimous.) 81 ZE-192-77, LOCAL BUSINESS TO COMMEP.CIAL: McC Properties. That the zone reclassification request file Number ZE-192-77) be forwarded to the Boarc of County Commissioners with a decision of No Recommendation. (Motion by Mr. Thomas to approve. seconded by Mrs. Byrne. Vote was ) three in favor,two opposedJ 90 ZE-2-78, AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS: TUPPER, That the zone reclas- sification request (File Number ZE-2-78) be denied without prejudice and the applicant be allowed to resubmit with a request for Residential Office. (Mrs. Byrne moved, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.) 10. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to have the Staff prepare recommendations for more than one (1) zone classification in the CoamatcLal. ?o nP 77 i 11. ZE-6-78, AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL: LYNCH. That the zone reclassification Wile Number 7E-5-781 be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as tnF, Planning Com-mission's Findings of Fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, and also that a proposed declaration of Non-significance.be Issued. (Mrs. Rawlings moved, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unanimous.) 12. PUDE-1-77, PRELIMINARY PI.ANITEAD UNIT DEVELOPMENT: R.AINER. Due to a lack of jurisdiction, 1.1iis Item was not heard by the Planning Commission. The item will be heard at a later date. 13. ZE-40A-73, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS: SISCO(Continental. 0 11L That the Reconsideration of conditions (File Number ZE-40A-73) on the zone reclassification be continued for one month to allow a more complete development plan to be submitted in regards to lighting and signing and also the hours of operation;recommendattons for conditions of approval be presented; and only testimony pertaining to the above Items will be heard at the public hearing. (Mrs. Rawlings moved, seconded by Mr. Main. Vote was unanimous.) 140 Mrs. Regan came before the Planning Commission with a request for Item ZE-105-77 to be placed on the March., 1978 Agenda. (Mr. Main moved, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.) 15 . That item ZE-189-77 be placed on the agenda for March, 1978. The .applicant is to pay the advertising cost. (Mr.. Main moved, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unanimous.) 160' Mr. Mike Senske requested that Item ZE-5-75 be placed on the soonest agenda that would be possible. Mr. Thomas Moved, seconded by Mr. Main. Vote was unanimous.) Mrs. Rawlings abstained from participating In the discussion or voting on ZN-166-77 due to a possible conflict of interest. Mr. Main abstained from partici- pating in the discussion or voting on ttems ZE-2-7/8 and ZE-6-78 due to a possible conflict of Interest. Planning Staff present: Dayharsh, Davis, Fergen, Sweitzer, Wesche and justice. Engineer's Office: Finney. Prosecutor's Office: Emacto.- DATED THIS 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1978* BY: Kathleen justice Recording Secretary For: Ted McCouiy Planning Commission Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh Director of Planning -4- 1 FILE N / i~ - THRESHOLD DETERMINATION DECLARATION OF (proposed/final) -significance/nons nnificance 1. Description of Proposal: 2. Proponent: 3. Contact Person: Phone: 4. County Action (s) Requested: Zone Change; Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval; Change of Condition Other: vocation of Proposal: t.L 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to l have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is .~~required under RCW 43.21C.03 (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a com- p etl ed environmental checklist and other information oA file with the lead agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name • YA i '-1' 1 Name I / i S' Lure flpSionature -k- Title , Title i ` Department A i Department V Date 01 17 Date Department Reference No. 8. For Declarations of Significance Only: Date of Expected Draft EIS Availability (determined by Responsible Official) Date of issuance TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: a. Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading to such declaration: b. Brief explanation of what measures. if any, could be taken by the applicant to prevent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of nonsignificance: IWALA CIO Ui SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ^ PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET - T' i PHONE 458-2274 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 a~ahe . M SSE MEMORANDUM TO: Spo co. )4-, -,-A) FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 509-456-2274 Attention: 4+lu 6_GUt7 7 ZtXT REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Proposed Declaration of Non- significance, Environmental Checklist, etc. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: '~e~ -6; , 9 The following is explanation for this determination: w, C_ /?'7-1y --4;~o o Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY OF JURISDICTION, WAC 197-10-040 (4). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advised that the proposal was listed in the SEPA Public Information Center on: et o~ Z79 DEPT. FILE REF. 2 ~o STAT'F P,7V71Y CYF F1~1177RONMT7,NTTAL r'~TF('?tTTS'T. lii dCC wit -id.; it, ^l C':iC v>r~uIIe Ji11ZC~7 LIi'v"11C1I1Ii1 IlLai Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the The following data briefly describes the proposal: A , Action Requested: Ct4O B. Description of Proposal: C. Location of Proposal: L5W 11) - I~ ~v II, Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: e, 41e-2& " 60 ~V&C_~ (R~ newj v4c ) ~ - 66) (Over) B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discussionof impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on II A, B and C above, the staff _ - 78 N r ^ ' r r u, S°OKANE COUKr. COURTHOUSE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Lloyd A. Lynch 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent:' S. 1405 Woodward Road, Spokane, A. 99206 924-6436 3. Date Checklist Submitted: January 16, 1978 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County, Wa. 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: Zone Change Proposal - ZE-6-78 - Agricultural to Restricted Industrial - Multi-tenant Warehouses. -1- (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- standing of its scope and nature): Approximately 50,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space would be constructed on the 21 acre site (of which 12 acres is propose or zone The proposed multi-tenant warehouse project would comprise three separate buildings (one is currently under construction on the currently zoned area), paved driveways and parking for 135 cars, three access points to Montgomery Drive, and a 5' to 20' wide landscape strip along Montgomery Drive. Buildings would be of cement block construction and would be oriented to Montgomery Drive, complying with Zoning Ordinance setbacks. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): Proposal is located on the SW corner of Montgomery Drive and Wilbur Road on the floor of the Spokane Valley, approximately mile NW of the Pines Interchange. Montgomery Drive provides arterial access to the pro- perty- The property is relatively flat and well-drained. Lying within an industrial corrider along Montgomery Drive surrounding land uses include: Spokane International Railway, a Burlington Northern branch, a lumber supply yard,•and an office building to the south, a propose extension o an existing trailer court and scattered residences on acreage tracts to the east, acreage tracts (no homes) to the north, and scattered homes on acreage rac s to the west. The Roundup Grocery Warehouse is approximately u mile further west. The corridor is being gradually converted to light industrial uses. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: The first phase of the project is currently under construction. Remaining portions should be completed by 1980. 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones): Spokane County Planning Commission - Rezoning Spokane County Building Codes Dept. - Building Permit, Spokane County Health District - Sewage permits. Irwin Water District - annexation. 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or con- nected with -this proposal? If yes, explain: Design of project utilizes entire land area currently acquired. Expansion would require acquisition of additional lands and is not currently contemplated. 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposals location? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: Other property owners to west have indicated a desire to develop property or sell the property for industrial development in the future. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected.to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Building Permit has been released for Phase one of project, which is currently zoned Restricted Industrial. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) -Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . X _ ~ -i 40 - 2 - so I (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDI IONA.L p:',C:ES J Yes Maybe No (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . . . , . . . . r (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . . . . X Explanation: Slight modifications will be made in surfact features of the pit to accommodate construction of the single story multi-tenant warehouse buildings and adjoining paved parking lots. YO & Mayhe.Ug 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?. (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . , . . (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X E_ xplanation: The kale of the project is small, nQt causing- significant changes in air--quality. Restricte• d Industrial Z=e prohibits industrial emissions or odor:a--- - 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff ? . . . . . , X (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . X (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? . . . . . - X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: S .al of project will not cause change in water quality, Su? dr -a. n aTe will be handled by on-.=, t.e dry well-s. Warehouse- nroiect i.jill u, 4, 4 _31 t' 'i11.t1,l: a similar sized property. -3- (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) Yes Mnvbe No 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . , . . , . , , (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? . . . , . . , , , , , , X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . , . . , , . , , . . , , , , , i (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop ? . . , , , X Explanation: Area is not currently used for agricultural purposes and is currently weed-infested. The property is within the urbanizing area and will not have any affect on existing Flora. Yes Maybe No S. fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . . , . . . . X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . , , . . , X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? X (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . , . _ X_ Explanation: Area is within urbanizing area, not having an affect on unique fauna. Site is removed from open water bodies. Yes M3vbe 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?. Explanation: Montgomery nri up in, riirrPn1-.1„crzr• h 3A Semj -trtlrkS..seruin~-- Roundup Grocery Warehouse. Restricted Industrial Zone prohibits objectionable noise generation from Industrial operations. Yes Maybe No 7, Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X Explanation: Parking lot will be illuminated by low intensity lighting standards and signing will be minimal. Restricted Industrial Zone prohibits emmission of glare perceptable from property line. Yes Maybe No 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? , . . . . , , . . A ~ Explanation: Comprehensive plan recognizes the transition of the area -to-jig-ht industrial uses. Previous Planning Commission actions in the area have D- vided for an orderly transition from scattered residential uses to light ,i industrial uses. em j LAtj F v -4- (IF SPACE FOR EMANATION IS INnDEOTJATE, PLEASE r~TT",C A , -TTO"TAL P.-AGES .i Yes Maybe 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: The warehousing activity handles the finished products of our economy, and does not in itself increase t.h( (-,f nr tbr, d-Tl) ^-tl on, of Yes Maybe No 10. Risk of Upset_ Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . X Explanation: Restricted Industrial Zone prohibits the handling or manufacture of hazardous substances. Yes Maybe No 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? , . . . . . . . . . . . , , , . X Explanation: The multi-tenant warehouse may have total employment of 50, primarily as relocation or expansion of local firms. Current housing growth in the Valley can accommodate this small increase in employment 12. Housing, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? . , , . . . , , , Explanation: See Item 11. Yes Maybe No 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? . . . , X _ (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . , . X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? . , . . . , , . X (e): Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? . . . , . , X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . , . , . . , , , , X Explanation: New facility will increase traffic on Montgomery Drive, which has been designed as an arterial to handle such increases. The new facility will provide Darking for 135 cars. -5- (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas? (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , X (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (c) Schools ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . X (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: Construction of the multi-tenant warehouse will reouire some consideration for fire and police protprti on concurrent with the development in the a a _ Twn fi rP h)Lrjrant-, will ha i netnl 1 erj fn .erve the nro ierts_ Yes Maybe No 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . . . . . X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? . . . . . . X - Explanation: Warehouse project will be served with electricity, telephone, and natural-gas for heating and lighting. It is not anticipated that energy will be used in production processes. Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (d) Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ Explanation: Utilities are available- in the area and will require connection to the project. No extraordinary utility needs are anticipate d. Power and natural gas will be extended by W.W.P.; telephone by PNWB; water by Irwin Water District. Septic tanks will be installed and drywells will be installed for storm water. Solid waste will be handled by Valley Garbag~bs Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health Itazard (excluding mental health) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: No toxic or biological agent.-, will he hand1 Prj pim-, pant- to requirements of Restricted Industrial Znne_ (IF FACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PILEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics . Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . , , , , , . , , . X Explanation: The site has no outstanding aesthetic features. Buildings will be compatible with adjoining industrial development. Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? X Explanation: _Warehouse will have no impact on recreation. Yes Maybe No 20. Archeological/Historical, Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: The site has no known archeological or historical significance. III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Date: Proponent: Proponent: Lloyd A. Lync i Address: S. 1405 Woodward Road, Spokane, Washington 9920r Phone: 924-643 Person completing form: John D. Konen, William W. Main Realtor:; Phone: 922-2000 Date: January 16, 1978 Dapt. or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: +/'7 l << 7 _ At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or against, the granting of this application. ,f AGE[NAA, FEBRUARY 17, 1978 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMI4ISSION Time: Friday, February 17, 1978,1:30 P.N. County Health District Auditorium Room 140, W. 1101 College B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIM 6. ZE~6-7_8, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial_ a. Location: Section 9, Township 251, Range 449 EWM. That portion of Tracts 16, 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Add. according to plat recorded in Volume "M" of plats, page 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying Sly of the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nly of the following described line. Beginning at a point on the W. line of Wilbur Road 150 ft., measured along said line, N. of the SE corner of said Tract 18; thence W. along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts 16, 17, and 18 to a point on the W line of said Tract 16. b. Applicant: Lloyd A. Lynch S. 1405 Woodward Rd. Spokane, WA 99206 c. Site Size: 1 2 Acres d. Existing Zoning: Agricultural e. Proposed Zoning: Restricted Industrial f. Proposed Use of Property: Multi-tenant Warehouses g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. Hut r1 r► Z O ~ w♦ a a 0 ~ MARIETTA AvE JACKS AWM - N MPATGOMERY OR V-ror4'O _ I ` Kq~b ~Q W W I ~c L AR U SLE Q ~O ~ too v ER M W1L_- EL /96.9 "co < u ll - .y fx LID load SHANNON EL 1965 F5 rNTGOMERY OR n m ~ r 90 O G, RA I L P t to 2 r Q d) go i--Z) A 64 O i #a r a* C a ail. V- A 1-- -a - -6- 1 1 I ZONE RECLASSIFICATION -z- c- OR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ACTION TAKEN APPROVE DENY CONTINUE LENGTH OF CONTINUANCE _ REASONS 1. 2. 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff's Findings, Dated i 7, Z 9 70f*' and subject to the additional conditions that 1. 2. 3. VOTE Motion by Seconded by VOTE YES NO _ FINDINGS ZONE CHANGE XZE- 6-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL LYNCH I. SUN, MARY The applicant's proposal Is compatible with surrounding land uses, is con- sistent with recent Planning Commission Zone reclassifications, is consistent with the Spokane Regional Comprehensive Plan Neap, has or can provide adequate provisions for circulation, sewage disposal, but the Spokane Count Health District has recommended that the applicants obtain annexation to an approved public water service entity for water for domestic use and fire protection II. GENERAL INFORMATION A , Existing Land Use - Site Vacant (Pasture) to the north Single family residence, vacant property, future trailer court to the south phase I of applicant's Industrial complex, existing residence, but proposed warehouse structure to the east single family residential uses on acreages to the west vacant property, residential uses on acreages Round-up Grocery Warehouse -1/4 mile west. B Zoning History of Area Request Date Action Taken to the north to Agricultural 4-24-42 Approved to Residential Mobtle Home 11-13-69 Approved to the south to Restricted IndliC.L.-ial 7- 1-76 Approved to Restricted Industrial 6-21-77 Approved to the east to Agricultural 4-24-42 Approved to the west to Agricultural 4-24-42 Approved to Restricted Industrial 5-17-73 Approved C. Comprehensive Plan Proposal Is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan map. Explanation The Regional Comprehensive Plan map Indicates the site as being appropriate for Industrial uses. III o SPECIAL INFORDiiATION A Circulation Frontage Type ADT Montgomery Drive Collection 21000 - 6 - A rte ria 1 ZE- 6-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Continued) B. Sewage Disposal From an environmental health view point, the project appears feasible but " until a sponsor or proponent completes a sewage permit applica- tion and submits a definitive development plan, we will not be able to submit any offitLal comments on sewage system sultabIlity or requirements " C Water Availability through - site is not located within the service area boundaries of a recognized public water entity, therefore, a condition of the requested zone change would be annexation to an approved public water service entity D, Fire Protection fire mains not available fire hydrants not available E Staff Environmental Review Analysis of the SEPA checklist indicates that a declaration of Non-Significance be recommended. However, evidence and findings presented at the public hearing concerning this proposal should also be oonsidered IV, CONDITIONS The Planning Department Staff feels the following conditions would be appropriate If the proposal is approved. 1. Access permits for the project area shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits. NOTE Access points must meet the approval of the Spokane County Engineer's Office, 2 Access points shall be delineated and paved to Spokane County standards 3, The advertised property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the development plan on file with this application 4. Any portion of the project which is to occupied or traveled by vehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. 5. An on-site storm-drainage system for the project shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office -6A- w~ ZE- 6-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Continued) 6 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main- tenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted for the project prior to release of building permits. 7. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to cover the cost of the required landscaping prior to release of building permits 8 Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the require- ments of the Spokane Valley Fire Marshal 9 Sewage Disposal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District, 10 o Annexation to a public water service entity 11, That the provisions of SEPA' s NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c. 080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, as instructed by the Planning Department Staff o -6B- 866-10 5POI~ANE VALLtq FIRE DEPARTIAtNT s04e'w' ;VA&ACe'WM ,Oeoe 64 EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE o SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99206 a TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 February 9, 1978 Mr Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson _ Spokane, Washington 99201 w Dear Mr Dayharsh The following preliminary svbdivisions and zone classification for upgrading has been reviewed`\for fire protection e` rrr j \ ZE-186-77 M & C Properties This are4`i~s covered by adequate mains and hydrants ZE-192-77 M & C Properties This area is covered by adequate mains and hydrants ZE- 2-78 Tupper This area is covered by adequate mains and hydrants 1,ZE- 6-78 Lynch ,t There are existing mains in this area, but hydrants will be needed, ZE-40A-73 Mains and hydrants riged to be installed\in this area v Al Cook i Lt of Inspectors AC sn r L 0 ECEIV SPOKANE CUURTMENT PLANNING DEPA PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or against, the granting of this application AG NU9 FEBRUARY 179, 1978 TELEPHONE NO 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time Friday, February 17, 1978,1 30 P M County Health District Auditorium Room 140, W 1101 College B ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ZE-6-78, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial a Location Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44, EwM That portion of Tracts 16, 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Add according to plat recorded in Volume "M" of plats, page 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying Sly of the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nly of the following described line Beginning at a point on the W line of Wilbur Road 150 ft , measured along said line, N of the SE corner of said Tract 18, thence W along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts 16, 17, and 18 to a point on the W line of said Tract 16 b Applicant Lloyd A Lynch s 1405 Woodward Rd Spokane, WA 99206 C Site Size 1 2 Acres d Existing Zoning Agricultural e Proposed Zoning Restricted Industrial f Proposed Use of Property Multi-tenant Warehouses g Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4 21, Section 4 21 040 h Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact H-I KI = m y t~ 41 a~ ® MARIETTA, aAVE JACASU QWMOKT,jOMERY OR 3d W v. y a n '%4 6 m CARLISLE @ ~ ~ t v I 1 Q ~ 1 1 _ L R M lWl - d-1 - £L /96.9 c < 4a IF I Nt .o A°'e 0®6~®0 SHANNON IN - EL 196° 5 HAN 8 L NDi^04A _ INI~I 1 fit U NTGOMERY OR n m - Y S RA 90 0 ® NoRn 1 o ' EL Ol Q Z a~'Lto r -a, t - *P -6- F At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or against, the granting of this application AGENDA, 1- RUARY 17, 1978 TELEPHONE NO 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CONIIVIISSION Time Friday, February 17, 1978,1 30 P M County Health District Auditorium Room 140, W 1101 College B ZONE RECIASSIFICATICN ZE-6-789 Agricultural to Restricted Industrial a Location Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44, EwM That portion of Tracts 16, 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Add according to plat recorded in Volume "M" of plats, page 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying Sly of the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nly of the following described line Beginning at a point on the W. line of Wilbur Road 150 ft-, measured along said line, N. of the SE corner of said Tract 18, thence W along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts 16, 17, and 18 to a point on the W line of said Tract 16 b Applicant Lloyd A Lynch S 1405 Woodward Rd Spokane, WA 99206 c Site Size 1 2 Acres d Existing Zoning Agricultural e Proposed Zoning Restricted Industrial f Proposed Use of Property Multi-tenant Warehouses g Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4 21, Section 4 21 040 h Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact L~ U 2 Q~ d 3 0 > Q 3 1 0 MARIETTA AVE JACKS0 A%1 MONTGOMERY DR T' ~d W .y .a n LARLISLE LR M W- 4A C) - > ~ EL 1969 Tyco Q ``r ~ Ili or 0111NI-1- . 4-,- IAN 11: I E! loud SHANNON EL 195,T SHAna T- z - - - NDiAPOA MrHTGOMERY DA n m r s RA L A. 90 0 PtA Ir Z t o ~ ~ woRA ` z o ^ if L -6- t zE-6-78 In the matter of a hearing to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial on property described as being that portion of Tracts 16, 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Addition according to plat recorded in Volume "M' of Plats, page 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying Sly of the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County„by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nl.y of the following described line. Beginning at a point on the W line of Wilbur Road 150 ft , measured along said line, N. of the SE corner of said Tract 18, thence W. along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts 16, 17, and 18 to a point on the W line of said Tract 16 Qtw-l (West of Wilbur Road and South of Mansfield fie) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF VJASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ~iopkc0\3 beins first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident of the State of Virashington over the age of 18 years That on the day of ~ 19-71K, I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copLes of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING in a conspicuous manner at each of the following locations, to-wit 2 3 c~ e ayc~ DATED THIS rjAy of 19 -7(111 SIGNED Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane, Washingtoz SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRI.,,. Inter-Office Communication Date 2/2/q, TO Spokane C IDI Sion FROM ill SUBJ= - Z C n Until a sponsor or proponent completes a sewage permit application and submits a definitive development plan, we will not be able to submit any official comments on sewage system suitability or requirements The location of subject proposal is not within the service area boundaries of a recognized public water entity, therefore,'a condition of the requested zone change would be annexation to an approved public water service entity R ECH ~-PED b 1C17a SCHD-AD*-030 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE r SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date 1-30 ,19M To C2UPjT4 T ~Ew (J~iaart♦ ~rL ) From ~-agru 1 tS tT,~Ll'L / Subject 7. 9° GZeQAssf r1eA7/a v Z C*- (2- 78 Aw lcuagaw- Tt~ f?M7vwcrE0 r1 inusr¢14(,- 14 cAnIpJ& r-6QwzuA2y 17) ► X78 NOTE u l.~ rlJ~ c/ Y y - 0 O s At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or aga2mt, the granting of this application AGENU, FEBRUARY 17, 1978 TELEPHONE NO 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CON4ISSION Time Friday, February 17, 1978,1 30 P M County Health District Auditorium Room 140, W 1101 College B ZONE RECLASSIFICATICN 6. ZE-6-78, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial a Location Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44, Em That portion of Tracts 16, 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Add according to plat recorded in Volume "M" of plats, page 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying Sly of the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nly of the following described line Beginning at a point on the W line of Wilbur Road 150 ft , measured along said line, N. of the SE corner of said Tract 18, thence W along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts 16, 17, and 18 to a point on the W line of said Tract 16 b Applicant Lloyd A Lynch s. 1405 Woodward Rd Spokane, WA 99206 c Site Size 1 2 Acres d Existing Zoning Agricultural e Proposed Zoning Restricted Industrial f Proposed Use of Property Multi-tenant Warehouses g Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4 21, Section 4 21 040 h Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse-environmental impact H 1 r 1 ~ ~ O W► t~ WE 0to Q ~ 4 f O a.. MARIETTA AvE J4LKS AW M MpATGOMERY R ^a 34 W b ® W LAALISLE -v e ~ l LR #A 04A- pry Ci ~ W to £L /96,9 Q ; _ q rim.it~ eo J. a g M /A N ti O N W - f[ 1-961T ~j H A► tie Al C4 IMI,I 1 IlP V NTGOMERY DR rl I 17 m ~ 90 RA I L C/ C. a/ lI 0 ~ ~ NOA<a A Z n O r c~ 0 < a e LP .a EL O C %7 A -6- i~ APPLICATION FOR SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING HEARING Public Works Building, N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Date nu,grg 12, Application No _ZE~_h_,7R Name of Applicant Lloyd A Lynch S 1405 Woodward Rd Street Address City Spokane State WA 99206 Telephone No 924-6436 Existing Zoning Classification Agricultural Date Existing Zone Classification Established Proposed Zone Classification R, estr, QtPd I12dustri l Proposed Use of Property MLaI ti- enant )darebousps- Legal Description of Property That portion of Tracts 169 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Addition according to plat recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, page 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying Sly of the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nly of the following described line Beginning at a poi n t on the W line of Wilbur Road 150 feet, measured along said line, N of the SE corner of said Tract 18, thence W along a line parallel with - - - - epees. the N line of said Tracts 16, 17, and 18 to a point on the W line of said Tract 16 Site Size I ',2. Ac i2 C:S Section 9 Township 25 N Range 44 E W M Street Address of Property Montgomery Drive - Wilbur Road Who Holds Title to the Property _ Beulah A Moon, E 11508 Mansfield Ave If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Purchaser Furnish a letter from a Title Inoirance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED 1 What are the changed conditions which are alledged to warrant other or additional zoning? The property is situated withi an area defined in the Spokane County Co p ehens ye Plan as appropriate for light industrial uses Industrial development has occurred in the corridor along Montgomery Drive-since the installation of the Roundup Grocer regional warehouse in 1973 The southern portion of the ownership adjacent to the Spokane International t-acts was zoned Restricted Industrial two years ago This request is an extension of the estab- lished zone change 2 What fact justify the proposed zone reclassification based on the advancement of the public health, safety, and general welfare' Development of the property will allow continued expansion of the Montgomery Drive industrial area with minimal impact on existing residential properties Buildings will be constructed to current standards, including proper installation of sewage systems, fire hydrants, perimeter landscaping, paved parking areas, and drainage control 4a 3 What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the value and character of adjacent property? Construction of the project will set a standard for other projects which will enhance the value and character of adjacent properties 4 Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? The current agricultural zone is not conduceQ~o continued development of the property, restricting such development tog~purs'its, single family residences, and perhaps duplexes The character of the area dictates a rapid transition to light industrial development including warehouses A reasonable return is not possible on the property with the restrictions of the Agricultural Zone A plot plan or sketch must be attached containing the following information (a) Scale of the drawing (b) North Point (c) All dimensions of property, existing buildings, and proposed buildings (d) Location of all existing and proposed buildings, or additions, with dimensions to the nearest property line (e) Off-street parking area (f) Defined points of access and egress (g) Date of the drawing y THE NECESSARY FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION The recommendation of the Planning Commission in this matter will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for final action Any person desiring to contest the recommendation of the Planning Commission must request, in writing, a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners no later than (10) days following the date of the public hearing held by the Planning Commission 7 (Signed) 15 LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY Spokane County Code Number ZE-6-78 Owners and Persons within 400 feet Application is for a Zone change from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial Certification of Title Company I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses consisting of this and the following . pages has been prepared from the latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct Signed by For J~Vje-rk(-A4 G" Title Company Date LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 1 01 PINECROFT FIRST AD jTj0N T 0 -C C-Cumm rn s- 09544-0513 East 11715 Mansfield T Cla ton C Cummin s Avenue 99106 0 F-1-o-rence 'Sha-'- 09544-0505 South 88 T Florence Sah North 2312 Wilbur Rd 3 0 ctrl a-h-M -Moon 09544-0519 East 11702 Mansfield T Beulah M Moon Avenue 20 0 Ik ----G°-°- Henr-1'ksJefi 09544-0520 T Ralph G Henriksen East 11808 Mansfield 21 & 22 Metropolitar Mort O ,and Service Co 0 5 - East 11920 Mansfield Block 24, EXCEPT T Pete Bascetta ' 'Pnqt all Blocks 25 &-2-6 0 T 0 Samuel J Cull - - - Blocks 31, 32 & 31B, Except T Lincoln Mutual Say Bk Hjghwal-z 0 Samuel C 1 .09549-0524 East 135' of Bloc 29, All T Linco u uta Sav Bk #6--3-3575-6 Hoffard Etal / 09544-Q523-_ T'Johnson & Hoffard East Portion of Blocks 27-29,(cont) ontinued on next page LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY Spokane County Code Number ZE-6-78 Owners and Persons within 400 feet Application is for a Zone change from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial Certification of Title Company I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses consisting of this and the following ! pages has been prepared from the latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct. Signed by For Title Company Date LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) Block 27 EXCEPT a ports n in the Northeast quarter of the Southwest quarter Olof Section 9 Townshi 5 North. ay all of Block 28, Block 9 EXCEPT the East 135' T J Llo d A Lynch 09544-0518 Beginning as the Southeast ,911 Lloyd A Lynch South 1405 17oodward Rd corner of BioCck 8, ence ~ 150', thence West parallel to the North line of Block 16, 7, and 18 0 to the West line Block 16; thence South to the Southwest corner, t then e Southeasterly to the Point of Beginning & 30' vacated strip Sout of & T adjacent 0 Be~crh- A-a°-Moon- 09544-0517 Portion North of line drawn T Beulah A Moon East 11702 Mansfield 50' North of the Southeast corner o Block 8, thence West parallel to the North line of Blocks to point 0 ,on the West line of Bloc 16, all Blocks 17 & 1 EXCEPT Street T p - .-Scott- 09544-0562 ast 12' of Block 14 & all of T E Scott East 11520 Mansfield lock 15 & 30' va ated strip South of & adjacent 0 T 0 Oliver°A-w-tWi111.s _ 09544-0514 Block 13 & West 1(8' Block 14 T Oliver A Willis East 11508 Montgomery & 30' vacated str South of & add ace t 0 T 0 1-a- enc-e--C--B c - est one-half of locks 5 & 9 T Clarence C Beck East 7 1 B o Continued on next page LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAY LNG TAXES ON PROPERTY Spokane County Code Number ZE-6-78 Owners and Persons within 400 feet Application is for a Zone change from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial Certification of Title Company I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses consisting of this and the following _ pages has been prepared from the latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct. Signed by For Title Company Date LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) I 0 ' S---`A P o t Q%S44-nsng c/o A Jo Postell 99204 T Sam A Poste East half Blocks 5 & 9 i 0 P & R Co Inc 09544-0501 c/o A Jo Postell 99204 T P & R Co 1117 Wash Tr Bld 1 1P & R Cq Inc 09544-0502 / c/o A Jo Postell 99204 TiP & R Co 1117 Wash t Bld 2 j P & R x Co Inc 09544-0510 c/o A Jo Postell 99204 TIP & R Co 1117 Wash Tr Bld 6 OP &rR Co I c n9544-n5ii C/o A Jo Postell 9920 5-T P R Co 1117 ash Tr Bl 116'- Block 10 0 P'& R Co Inc 09544-0512 t c/o A Jo Postell 9920 4 T P & R Co 1117 Wash Tr Bld EXCEPT "e t ock 10 0 SECTION 9 TOWNSHIP 25 -North, RANGE 4 T 0 S A Postell 09543-9043 c/o A Jo Postell 99204Portion of the North half ;14at Postell 1117 Wash Tr Bld of the Southwest quarter 71ying Northerly of Railroad Right of Way EXCEPT the West 1900' & EXCEPT 0 the East 1 acre 1 in South of the North 4335' T 0 K Slater 09543-9018 C/o A Jo Postell 99204East 1 acre of aportion >'Sam A Postell 1117 Wash Tr Bld in Northeast ua ter of the Continued on next page Southwest quarter lying South of the North 4335' & North of SI Railroad Right of Way it DATt. January 12, 1978 ZE-6-78 Spokane County Planning Coinmissio,l ~-.ounty Court House Spokane, vv ashington 9.',201 Gentlemen v e , tree undersigned property owners, request the Spokane County Planning Commissio.z (to consider a zoning plaii) or (to consider cnanying the .oning map) from Agricultural to Restricted Industrial on the followini, described property That portion of Tracts 16, 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Addition according to plat recorded in Volume "m" of Plats, page 37 in Spokane County, WA lying Sly of the County Rd as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under AF number 7407170246 and Nly of the Following described line Beginning at a point on the W line of Wilbur Rd 150 feet, measured along said line, N of the SE corner of said Tract 18, thence W along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts 1\1kv iE ADDR.tSS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY I a Fr a Si - 9s'~ o~2a 1 2 (71 aia X, AIVVLW~ /ice 04 ~~o ~ o qs- y y a 6 z yon 7 C,FS y OS-o ~ bg~y~ r4~~J i 0 q67<1 9 C,,S- /o, O.5'1 / cam', Z 10 (-SSW- t CQ l/vn 4'01°a ~TPAWV 14 o V &9 5,e Aol Y 12 1~ 14 15 lb ffo WOLUAM W RQABN REALTORS Commercial & Industrial Division u ~ Comf~a-t6x-z c e C`I "r' YY) 11`1 s o X 13 a~rc~ x A/ore~ C_p 5 - 3/, (?o C3 Sh® ags~Ci y ' cgs o~ z o~ C619 -Xa7~ = g9 75-0 20 t~ d95 ~y - 00681 ~x ~s = 73~ /,2,5 0~1'9d 000 Y to Fe d ccboft i4 ///IS o ?6* ~ - c6s / ~ ~3o X 396 8 7, -'/o c~ C /a reptcr C &J4 o z" - c , o x :2.20 33, ooa 9 paa, 07,5-0 -OSro /00 x .230 po C-) 0,75,99 " aS c z 6,cy / v 3wox 33o f / $ 3(:) 6 0,511 vs ~ Z 'oa C4c1 o~J~iY -vS.?5 z -7j 49 v 95~~ - ~ / 2-5--A 3 p 3a, 7,S') " s A5V// v s68 sc--> x 2 36 1 36,0 Tol' 3 Z UtAAZ( 12706 EAST NORA ROAD o SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99216 o [509] 922 2000 ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Date TO Title Com any FROM Spokane County Planning Dept change application ZE-6-78 Agricultural to Restricted Industrial SUBJECT Zane rty Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of all propo arty located NN shin 400 feet and the five nearest property owners of the pp described Lelow Also, please include all mortgage and loan numbers with addresses, when possable in order that proper notification may be made If there area list loses lease furnish ownerships more than five owners within the 400 foot boundary, of the owners and taxpayers of record for the be accepted by this Incomplete or illegible title company lists will not department Thank you (Property Description) That portion of l ^racts 16, 17 and 18 of Pinecroft First Addition accorrdingtoSpplatt I'M" 37 in Spokane County, Washington lying recorded in Volume of Plats, page pb deed recorded under AF number the County Road as conveyed to Spokane County by described line Beginning fat a point on 74o7170246 and Nly of the following the W the SE oint of said corner line of Wilbur Rd 150 feet, measured along said line, along a line parallel with the N line of said Tracts Range E W M Tract 18, thence W and 18 to a point on the W line of said Tract 16 Section 9, Township 25 gSpokane County, Washington Lloyd A Lynch S 1405 Woodward Rd Spokane, WA 99206 Contact John D Konen, William W Main Realtors-922-2000 924-6436 - s~ i 4 VV o IN a y 1 1 1 1 r e r A f / ~ o F~ ~ ~ ,dam All, to ` r ! R al ~ ► ~ .~s ~ ~ fi r'~ - t ray ~ 111 • ~r ~ ~.1!a~ 41 ~y 3 1 I ~ Y- zJ fry ' ~ ~ ~ a ~ •i Y ` Ire---~ar~.+.►«.. - i r r fas- - ® « 36 -7:' 3 -JO (9 I n, t.. 17& yL 3lo & -1, L r 0 M~4NSflEtD - I►fr~IN,SI~I,>r,LD '2~ 2 231 di ` V A Vic. 7 /OW T %I 1 0/6 -7 - f/0 a M A 6 y* 7 re' I h ti 17.r 1 ~3 I - JO 7 e7 31 i - ryrr 04 W -law, V BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION WORKSHEET e PLEASE PRINT AND COMPLETE ONLY THOSE PARTS OF THE FORM YOU UNDERSTAND (Please return this original and your building plans to the Department of Building and Safety) 1 Owner 9Name (last) (first) (m) Department Use Only ?2Z2 I Ras Comm 2 Project Address (not Mailin Address) or Road Name Space Zip 3 Gty/Community Sta Subdl is on IPlat Name ~ C~~=~l~l ~ tit >ti~ C czcF=--t (s--r 4 Assessor Par I I Lot Block Uq DEPARTMENT USE ONLY • a a 5 Sic Code Zone Act a Zone Project No I 6 Dwell N No of Buildings Sq Ft !Acre Depth Frontage t O 96 7 Set Back Fro?1 (L)S 1 (R)S-2 Rear Census Tract Module No I a 16 Architect Firm Name Street Address P W M b tut lcli1 CLIP, M 1'J of I& &D ~:7 Zip G y State Phone ~cl 2GZ°~~c 1N > ~2~ ~102e, Contact Person Phone if different than above Contractor Firm Name Street Address Zip City State Phone tact Person License No Phone if different than above v FA U G / (mil G> ( ) 8 Owner/Agent (if different than #1 above) Business Address 9 Zip City State Phone 12 Review Required Plan Check ~1N) Other (Y IN) SEPA Exempt (YIN) Date ~ f 15 Type Work Bldg ❑ MH New :1 Replace ❑ Other ❑ Fire ❑ Demo C Add/Alter ❑ Move 14 Descr be Work 10 Applicant Name Street Address s 11 Zip City State Phone ( 1 * Lender Street Address Zip City State Phone Contact Person Phone if different than above Additional Information 1 ~~.Fi~w► YS it C~ l C-1 1~cy tl J' Z ~l.l~ l~ t ~~$Z.Wt "'Ar = 0CD04 C7 84aj DEPARTMENT APPROVALS This is not a Permit Application Type (Standard unless (Indicated approvals required in ether release or release with conditions ' otherwise indicated) space prior to permit issuance) Fast Track ' Early Start Release Release w/cond 1 Hold 2 Environmental Health Commercial ❑ Residential W 1101 College ❑ New Construction ❑ Bldg alteration /addition Room 200 ❑ Additional structure APPLICATION fl -011 Q 3a Co ition / m ents Z2 - Planning/Zoning P Commercial ❑ Cert of Exemption ❑ Frontage N 721 Jefferson ❑ Setbacks ❑ lot wld ❑ lot size ❑ uselzone ❑ CU variance zone change shoreline ❑ fence ❑ Other OTC Jga.4g4A0±~1 IMAilu®P` Conditi /,Comments Engineers - ommercial ❑ Residential _ Flood PI 1 \ N 811 Jefferson drainage ❑ new access/ approach ❑ fence ❑ road improvements ti Conditions/ Comments Utilities N 811 Jefferson o Conditiong/Comment $y o r s Other Y~ Plan Exam 16/11 I Fire Prev Conditions/ Comments A-r-fACAJ A LLa N C 13 Project Representative Telephone a Agencies Performing Special Inspection C 1 X o U f0 M E 2 y _O 1 LL C LL 3 1 Indicate above or attach conditions relative to final: as built approval 2 Indicate above or attach reasons for hold 1 'Vie S ,S a'p-:v -'L ° "MMM' ~F~ 4 ^ 34...`f i`w l~ Y .i w- t-o d F+,`~ 7f' \r}., y,► µ7 ,o "F,b` ?,r~,~ 'r N C./ --~uLlf J'A ~4' ~+r .~,Tt ~S' r ~i^ 1 F . 7` ` ~ ~tf...e-rwc.~. i'SL.'~v:s- ,Yy e~_~ fit' ~•j ~ ~ e ~y~ J!~ « ~ _ " ,x_,c,~, G} ~ f'_ ^ ~*v ~'~C. ( p ~It ~+s ~ I ,.i- w,~,y,r,..~'y 5'r- N'