ZE-177-79
r
, A, 6,
,
~ -
. ~.tfi-
ZONE/PUD RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST
Contact: 3 C) ~ File # 2 C -7 ~
r
PA RT
ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP ~(Legal '~G~ ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAPDescription, 400 foot boundary outside
ownership)
~ ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION,(F o r m A)
C V ZONING WORKSHEET
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
~ PLOT PLANS (5)
.
' SIGN PLAN LANDSCAPE PLANS (5)
GRAPHICS PACKET
SLIDES (minimum size film 126) (date)
K K APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER 3 S11 ~1
TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS ~o (date)
PART II
COUNTY AGENCIES NOTIFIED
NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPED, (date)
ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT
(date)
~ STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
STAFF ANALYSIS
v AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (A Sign - 4x4) (date) l.i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED /
~ /MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERIVED AGENCIES (date)~ ~
(dater
IvANALYSIS MAILED TO APPLICANT
(date)
PA RT UL
HEARING EXAMINER COMMTTTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED ~
DENIED
• CONTINUED
/
MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT ( te)
SEPA's Nokice of Action
BONDING (Landscape) ACCEPTED
(date)
RETURNED _
(da te)
i ~
• • V 1 V 1 • ~ . • ~ . ~ - _ • _ ~ .
NOR TN S~ .baeph
4oA T . y
-t . .
_ i~ ~ {
' ~ ~ • + ~ ' t f t'v 4 i
,
~ : , ~ .
ri
s•_ • ,.1.. ( ~f:•.~w VI~R o~~
~ ~ ti--,~ ~ . , ~,1,~ ~ ~ - - • ; RtCN
♦ / ^ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ . . . . . . - ~ q ~ ~ ,
• , _ .
ti E L L3X - - • ♦ ~ ~I ( ~ ~ o~, ~ t•.
. : << • ~
+'~'~~r ~--~'t' C ~y "~l :~t ~ .,1,•`
1 ~ T
m
• 1 r ` `
1 ` I !
79
E~177 a
~
j1 - A
~
4 ~
, 1
LIC
' ' ~ "1
j~~ + ~
~ • r
14
0j,lCAjv4E . ~ ~ . ,
PA~~ I r->18LYC-* aYE - ~ ~XPw~ ~~f ~ M' ' ~ :
TARIA L
i - • ~ ~ -
~ _ • _ _ : 0 A v E .
.•........-'7, a .-r~. ,
e •
V
i_. E ~ ~ ~~~I~ ~ _ V►1wa/ ~ ~
_ ~ 1 ~ ~ • ~ T
~ i~ I' • ~ .
n ,
. . ~ •r~?~~ ` ~ ~ _ . 71 m
t V ~ ~ , ~
~ ~ . 2 .
~ ' .
I 2 - • - _ , . ` ~ . ~~'~'~"X - ~ ' ~ • ~ r
~ • . /
N
. ,
~ ,
, a 000 CE
• , , il 1%4 Ip 4✓I: i ~ . . _
' , : , - • . ..~1. . _ ~ ,
i
r
! ~ , ~ , •
, .
oi,
• M ~ (
J{ - .
✓
~
.ooor
~
~'O
.
x:
kt,ffvt ~
~
,
;
~
jt
V
P-F
I~
44 •
~p
~
h'
,M
~
,
x
~
~
~
G
h
I
~
II
~
1
~
N'
1
1 ~
~
~
j
ur
1!
R
I .
, ,
- c►_~ 1 ~ l I,
• , , - ~~~Q~-~ I c ~ I .8/`_ I +
• .G .
„ .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
x ,1 ; BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
~1. PHONE 456-2205
< <i ~ )7~ a
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
`_~r°,~--y -r°~,. i.• - . - _.-~~r,-,w~?'?! _
SPOKANE COUVTY COURT HOUSE
CURRENT PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
TO: 1. Department of Ecology 2. Social & Health Servicvs
3. Health District 4. Audubon Society
5. KREM TV 2 6. Mr. Ray Card, 208
Coordinator
7. Consolidated Irrigation District #19 8. Fire District #1
9. SCAPCA
FROM: Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99260
(509) 456-2205
Attention : Marcia Raines
REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review
Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached.
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Depart-
ment, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the
County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the
following project:
B&K PARTNERSHIP ZE-177-79 John D. Konen
This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. '
Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to
be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040
(4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)).
Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided
in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on
December 26, 1979. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before January 9, 1980.
The subject proposal or action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE
VALLEY SOLE S4URCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED
BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as
to whether you feel an Envi ronmental I mpact Statement ( E I S) should be prepared.
A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1980, to be held in
Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson,
Spokane, Washington.
Enclosures
Revised 12/1/79
t
- z~P7-a-~~
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
SS.
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
e.0 kN P. e4 mp~ ,
Being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
That at times mentioned herein he was, and
now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident
of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of
twenty-one years.
Tha t on Do C p vnjl.P r ,02 P1 , 1979,
he personally posted a true and correct copy of
the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at
the following location in Spokane County, to-wit:
~
1
. . ~
Applicant or Agent
Subscr' ed nd sworn to m ) ~
l
, 19
5 -
NOTARY BLI IN AND F()R E COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Residi g a Spokane, Washingto -
AFF I'DAV IT OF i'AI L I N'G
STATE OF WASrIINGTON )
) SS.
COUNTY 0F SPOK?.NE }
Javne Carlson
Being first duly sworn on o ~ses and says :
~
That I am a ci tizen of the United States of America
and a resident of the State o£ Washington, and over the
age of eighteen years.
Tha t on the 28th day o f Dp.,
1979, I personall.y deposited in the Uni~d~ States mail rzt
Opportunity, Washington
with sufficient postage prepaicl, a true and correct copy
of the NOTICE OE HF-ARING, a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the
recorded real property owners and/or ta}:payers, as shown
' on the Spokane County Treas-urer'~S records as of the
lgth day of December _ 1 29 79 , who
have been found to own property within afour ~hundred
(400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and
did notice adjacenC property owners to the site by
certified mail. The notices were addressed to those
individuals and sent to those addresses as inc'i.icaCed on
the attachrnent attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference. DAT E U th i. s 8th d a y o f January ~19 80.
SUBSCRI.BED and SWORN to me this ciav of
~
~
L-KOTARY P(.1BLIC I,1 tlltiD F'.7R SPQKAINE COUN'I'Y,WASHIidG7'ON
Residing at Spokacie, tlashington
AFPLICtaTION NlJi°i$ER
~
1
t,
-a ~ ~ ~ ~ D
LI5T OF OWNERS ANI) P~S4C~~ PAYIIVG TAXES ON PRO~ERTY
Spokane- County Code Nwnber: ZE-1 7 7-79 Owners and Persons within 440 feeto
Appli~ation is for aZane Recla,ssificaGian, AgricuZtural Lo Restricted Industrial
~
. „ ~
Certification c~f Titl.e'Comrany: I hereby certify that the fallowing list of narnes and
addresses cansi~ting of this mnd the fallowing pages ha.s been pregared frorn the
latest available recardz and is to the best of my know~edge carrec'to
a
x.gned by For Pi nu.~er National 'U tlc~ Ir~gur~t~[;o-•
S
(Title Ccmpa-1y)
Da~".e. DeCeII1bGr 18, 1979 U}'.Sr.r FAR'rS LRRY~'sArrED rr,RACrT'-S
PLAT 11 3
LAST GRA.N'~~~ ~ CHAIN ADDI`~~ON
C7~` TITLE (0) AND ADDkESS LOTS BLK
FERSUNS PAYING TAXES (T) .
~ 06s53-0 106
~c~e~-k~"c L~ Pe~x~c~~l-V.?.~ue ,.,_.~..titi.. 6 9
T Inland Aspha2t Co ~ Box 11036 Spoka,ne, VA 9921:
j 06553-014T
~ ,,,F ,r%4n6 7 Ct:h --A4_ That n a z tia nNa rtf-4_,,,,~O
of a I in,e drawn 4 40' so ut tr of
S~.me the Narth~7est corner ~,o t~
east liYie 280, 2. ' sou h af the
Nartheast cnrner. ~
`T' -
06553-0108
IV. 3614 Flora Road That Dnr. tian Saut7i ot 7 f)
3 7.iT12 Clr$om 440r a01~th of
T ~ Sarne the Northwest c;orner to the
east l.ane 230, 2' souich af tYre
~ ~Nox`theast corner.
. ' ~
T
06553-0109
0,L.7)_ 17odsan Sub7:,ct.,g.ggge, ~That ncartion east a 71
the east~rly line o~
T Breckenrid~e and ~~vet,t Pn-~L~'l Sn~k, an~,, ..~d~ qciUa, b1,ock 85 urnr~e~J.i.nR norU-L'
! 065.53-0111
Rabert A. Wilk.inson 72
T Inlancl Asphalt Co. j3ox 11036 Sno1cana. WA 99211
06553°- 012 3
0 L. IJ _Dods n n c- r14 i~;F 3~---
~ ~ of a line d-rawn 21I ' southerly
IjBreckenrid~ze & i~iv~Pt,,,j - t e_zAixxJ7er1.y
~1ine.
ol
T~ 06553-0124
~
0_ _ 1L.D,__Pr,7~son 1'r
p~c~~~.rt~~
`~--$reckenri€iae . & Ka_vett _2?.j ._Tn7~_ Qq91~ ~
° { Coa~tinued on next page7
LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAxINa TAXFS ON PROPERTY
LAST GRANTEE IN CHA IN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRFSS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXFS (T)
zi.gh.t o~ wa,y, of Aven.ue.
0 Carr continued ^
T ay, to the_ fixue poj,4nt p~ DeO.Tn,:~n,g.
Q6555-OlOG
OTnl ancl Fmpi rP p~anP :o. , fl~x hf~h SnQkanA Q) ~ F~9
t__ hL.
T ~p
0 )6553-~9Q28
H'gQ R° Ps P"a E
Tfi,e south, $ rods. of the
ZHcx BLnc ~j. 3614F1 roRd
0 Sout,~iwest; ua,zter Qf Sec,t~,on,
H
T
06553-Q031
OFred Rogers etal
Tfi,e nort 8 rods of the Vest,
THCR Ranch N. 3614 FZora Rd 2n ro d.
-
,,~,pf 1 c) t 7 n f,-Lbp QD14tbL
west quartex except, tfig west
0 , 155' nf rF,P qn„rl; 1lnt the
S'ecti`on 6, Town.sfi,i:p 25, Fange
.
T 4 5 . E[aTM,
OFrPd RnuPrq Route. 1, Box 842, Ot11S• 06553-9032
l - Orchards, tid`A. 99027 Th,e west 15V of the soutfi
T Same 130' of the nortb 8LQ4k .
of the west 20 xods of 7,ot,
0 , 7in the southwest aqarter
of section, 6, Township 25,
T RanQe 45. ET-JM.
0
T
0 ~
T
0
T
0 T
(Continued on next page)
LIST OF OFJNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN
OF TITLE (0) AND . ADDITION
PERSOtVS PAYING TAXES (T) ADyRESS LaTS BI,~{
Q6553--012 7
0 p P r R• S "t 86
South 228' except
TGXgp_r. Western Fed. S& I~ Loan #5810-DZ0 tth,e„ West~4Q9''
06553-0128
0 Deloris Coman Portion of Blk 86
36 except the North 106' and
T Harold W. Coman. Jr. E. 16720 32nd Ave excent South 228'
06553-0132
0 M.J. Lijzhtfoot ; The East 75' of the
+ West 225t of the Soutli 206'•
T Bancshares Mortgage iLoan # 730154 87
1 06553-0133 87
G(Zi 1hPrt Rrant !_F 17191 tn,., East 75' Of t11E,' WESt
225' of the Norht 91' of the
T Same South 297' & East 75t of tfie
West 300' of tfie South 297'
0
T
06553-0134
0Al f rPd, M.a v .11(11 Ta;liirl P~„ Rr~ r
o t e ast iJb.4'
`Z' SamP , 87
06553-0135
d J& J tidholesale E. 15819 (;ameron C:t ,
T Same Ileradale WA 99f1'l 7 North 143' 87
( 06553-0136 0 Richard R. Curry, E. 17411 Aalton Ave ~ The Fa,yS,t, 150' ql-.Lli,P 1ip50'
except the Norht 143'
1 Same 87
06553-0137
0 John A. McCartv 1. 32U %;DirleY„ Rd lbtz Fa~ t_L5, R-' q~bp 9=h
98' of the Norht 34I1 87
T Same
06553-0138
0 Mabel E. McCarty N. 3221 Tshirlev Rd
East 158.4' of the
T Same South 9 9' R7
06553-0139
0 MPrron K. Hew on E,-] 7,_D9 12a1, tnn Av_A
West 75' except the Norht
T Same 14,11 87
06553-0140
0 Anthonv D. Montova E. 17311 Dalton Ave East 75' of th,e Wy,s,t, 190~
T Same except the 1Vorth 143' 87
(Continued on nexi page)
LIST OF OWNFRS AND PERSONS PAYINa TAXFiS ON PROPERTY
LAST GRANTEE IN.CHA IN u ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ` ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) .
06553-0147
0 DCloris Coman ` .
East 31 of the Norht 106' of
T Harold W. Coman Jr. E. 16720 32nd Ave West 409' 86
06553-0152
0 W. G. Wagstaff 60 & 61
T Wagstaff EnQineering Box 11186. SDokane. 99211 Except the Nprht 200'
06553-0I56
0-Deloris Coman j The South 228' 86
of the West409'
T Harold W. Coman, Jr. E. 16720 32nd Ave except the South 25'
06553-0159
0 I. Puckett 71
Beginning at the 5outhwest
TreAnna Campbell N. 3504 Flora Rd. corner then north on the west
line 305.2' then east at right
0 angles to the west line of said
tract to an intersection with
T the east line of siad tract 85 •
extended notth then south to the
0 northeast cormer of tract 85 then
south 73 degreee-06 minutes
T west 627.9' to the point of beg.
0 06553-0160
Ro~ers etal 71
- Beginn~ng 305.2' nort,h,and 33V
T HCR Ranch N. 3614 Flora Rd -„=4is,t .a ~inr of,
tract 71 th.en Noxht 264" then
O
~ LlnTth SS pvrApS U mi'n,ltoc
Eas-t 321.7' then Soutfi. 440"
T A-lgQ~.IJing.t- 9791 mn r p n r 1 pc a, -
06553-0163 ~
0 n H Nat1-anhiirQ
1 '
That portion of txact 83 1yi,ng
T
Tnpl~$RniitA 1_ Mi a ~A AAn` Dnr.t-l,QfF.lJtI id .A1Lt' F'.~Xppfi_ the
West 226.46' of the Sotith 192.35'
0 ~ pXL_j2r='=glnn i' qt-a n_ ni'nt Ori
th.e west line of Euclid ,Ave. then
Z' Za.-j- 99F2..UT ro. t h P~ t rn.---=•.+= int
of b&.ginning th,en North, 242.491
0
thP,.n Pa_t- 380,,6' t~,o, h P _ a pt
' liae of said tract then south
T , 76r 1 9' r,g, hP SQ tt1iPast rgxxex
of sai,d tract tfien South. 58
0 deerPPZ_.Z~ ~ m" S, 1 ~ eonds
,13Sb~~~ ....y~r......
west along the southerly ine of
T said tract 315.53' to the north
(Continued on next page)
T ^ile No. ZE-177-79
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 10, 1980,
and the members of the Committee present being John Culler, Chairman, Kenneth
Kennedy and Paul Sceva, Jr., and there being the following persons present
who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; John Konen, applicant's agent
for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial for the purpose
of a warehouse/industrial buildings.
B. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, mini-storage, and
undeveloped.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for
industrial development.
3. That the existing Zoning of the property described in the application is
Agricultural.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fu Ifi Iled .
6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula-
tion.
7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within
the proposed Zone Classification.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
1
^ 7ile No. ZE-177-79
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis-
approval of the proposed use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony
with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare.
C. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of B& K Partnership for a zone reclassification as described in the
application should be approved.
Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion:
1. AI I travel roadways and parking areas shal I be paved.
a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL
1. The site is located in Fire District #1.
2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed. Access plans for firefighting
equipment shall be approved prior to building permit issuance.
b) COUNTY ENGINEER
1. Applicant shall dedicate a maximum of 30 feet on Tschirley Road for
right-of-way. The applicant shall be a willing participant in an RID to
upgrade Tschirley Road in front of the proposed development and
south to Euclid Road; also Euclid Road from Tschirley to Flora Road.
No building permit should be approved until the road improvements
have been compfeted.
1 2
7ile No. ZE-177-79
2. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalts shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of
the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be
maintained in hard surface paving.
3. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be
approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the
issuance of building permits for the project.
c) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Purveyor is Consolidated I rrigation District and will supply the site
with adequate water for domestic fi re and i rrigation uses.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRIC'T
1. This project lies in CWSA #3 and within the service area of Consoli-
dated Irrigation District. It will require:
a) Possible redesign requires approval by RE-DSHS or by DOE.
b) Each building permit should be cleared by DOE to assure proper
care and handling of industrial waste and compliance with air
pollution standards and State Department of Labor and Industry
(L & T) standards.
e) SEPA
1. That all plans for stormwater runoff be approved by the Spokane
County Engineer, in cooperation with the Spokane Office of the DOE.
(NOTE: DOE is concerned with and responsible for all disposal schemes
involving industrial sites where potentially contaminating materials may
exist. )
2. That the plans of each building be reviewed by the Spokane Office of
the DOE for compliance with non-sanitary waste disposal measures
before issuance of a building permit.
3
-ile No. ZE-177-79
3. Prior to construction, each structure shall be subject to SEPA review
by the Building Codes Department unless exempted pursuant to WAC
197-10-170 (1).
4. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080
RCW be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal
action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed by the
Planning Department staff.
f) ZONING
1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main-
tenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall
be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release
of building permits.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance
within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee.
Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be
permitted, inctuding, but not limited to the following changes:
Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the
permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in
the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the
development plans shall be maintained.
3. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and
signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any
building permits.
4. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant.
Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by
the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee.
4
-ile No. ZE-177-79
g) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a
review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi-
cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration
of non-significance.
Motion by: Sceva Seconded by: Kennedy
Vote: Unanimous
HEARI EXAMINER COMMITTEE
~ ai rman
0
E r r
ATTEST:
>
FRED L. DAYHARSH
Planning Director
BY :
5
y ~
4; - Z4NE F2ECLASSIFICAT1ON 41UMBER: Z E-1 77-79 Ilf. AGENCfES ~ONSULTEa/COMMENTS RECE11~ED (continued) -
e) SEP'A 1. That al1 pfans for stormwater runoff be approved by the Spokane
County Engineer, in caoperation with the 5pokane Office af the
DO E.
(dVOTE: DOE is cQrreerned with and responsible for aII disposai
schemes inuolving industrial sites where potentially contaminating
materials may exist. ) =
2. That the plans of each buifding be reviewed by the Spokane
Office of the DDE for compiiance rnrith rron-sanitary waste
dispasal rneasures before issuance of a building perm6t.
3. Pri4r to canstruction, each structure shall be subject to SEPA ~
review by the Building Codes Departmerat unless exerrpp#ed ~
pursuar,t to wac 197-10-170 (1). 4. That the provisioras of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant ta
43.21C.080 RC1N be accomplished by the appFicant within thirty
(30) days of formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner
Committee as instructed hy the Planrring Department staff.
f3 ZON~ ~G
1. A specific Iandscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable tv tFre Spvkane County Zoning Adminis-
trator shail be submitted v►rith a performarrce bond for the project
prior -to release of bu'rlding permits.
2. TMe applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord-
ance within the coricept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Minor variations vvhen appraued by the 2aning
Adrrtrnistrator will be permetted, inciuding, but not limited to the
fallowing changes. Building Ivcation, fanclscape pIans f and
general ailv+nrable uses vf t,he permitted zone. AlI uariatians must
corifarrn tv reguiations set fnrth in the S}~okane County Zoning
4rdinance. The vriginal intent of the develrapment plans shaJl be
maintaineci.
3. Appraval by the Zvning Administrator of a specific lighting and
signing plan far the described property prior to the reiease of
any building permits.
4. The request has ~~oven to be environmentally non-signif icant.
Therefore, a final declaration of non-signifieance shafl be signed
by the Chair~man of the Fiearing Examiner Committee.
1
•
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION _.JM6ER: ZE-177-79
II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) -
►
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial
NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 3(to be removed)
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 13
Total Square Feet Approximately 210,000 sq. ft.
Percent of Coverage ' 33%
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 story PARKING REQUIRED: 210
PROVIDED: 500
III. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED
a) COUNTY FI RE MARSHAL
1. The 'site is located in Fire District #1.
2. No comments received.
b) COUNTY 'ENGINEER
1. Applicant shall dedicate 30 feet on Tschirley Road for right-of-
. . way. Applicant shall upgrade Tschirley Road and Euclid Avenue
to conform to typical County Road Standard #4.
2. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be
in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any
portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
3. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be
approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the
issuance of building permits for the project.
c) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Purveyor is Consolidated Irrigation District and will supply the
site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses.
d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. This project lies in CWSA #3 and within the service area of Con-
solidated Irrigation District. It will require:
a) Possible redesign requires approval by RE-DSHS or by DOE.
b) Each building permit should be cleared by DOE to assure
proper care and handling of industrial waste and compliance
with air pollution standards and State Department of Labor
and I-ndustry (L & T) standards.
~
_
3 +{I~ d1 I ~b il+J~.~.
R~~;EIP'~ FOF~ ~CiiTIF~ED f~A~~, ~~~E~PT fOR CERTI~IEQ C~AI~. REC~I REC~I~T FOR +~ERTI~IEQ MAIL RECEIF? F4R ~G~~filFl~l PT FUR C I I a AIL CERT«IE[~MAIL
~RTIFI~D M ~E~~IPT ~~R GE~T F ~ M AIL PJO INSU~ANEE CflyERAGE I'RDYIO~R- NA NNSU~iANC~ CQVERP,GE pROYIaEfl- M~ ~MSURA~i~~ C~VER~ ~Ia IHSl1RAN E COY~'AA!6E P~'f9Y10E0- h~0 !NSl~RANCE GQVE`~A~E ~OVI~ED~ NO INSU~At~~E ~VERAGE PRO~'Y! :oVERAGE rROwraffl-
N01' ~DR IHTEAH~~JQW~kL MA~l~ ~IOT FQA f14TERN~Ti4~llll MAIL ~YI~ED~ ~ NOfi FQA INTERN~il0liAl ~IAI~ N~T FC~~ IHTGRt~~TlO~VA~. i~all MOT FQA INTEAHATJDHAL MA~! NOT FO~i Ifl~ERNATIOHAI MAlI ~.r RwlATlO!NAC MAI1 ~-~.Qtry~r:.
ES~~ ~~~,vn~r:f~j ifi~U ~~~~+,~~~t:p {S~eeR~ver~~e f~~p ~ev~rs~► ~;5~r ~~w~rue} R~,a,r~e, SENT Tr crr,--~ ~ s~.~ 1 ~ f, r,; r ~ ~ ~ ~E~~ft~y -.r~--~ 7i:.,~ _ ~ ~~y~ ~ i
. •G' ~ sj ~ x ~ ~ Fl y.Y , F _ . ~ _..M" ! + . . , ~ f~_~ ~ . ~ ~ R a.. ~ _ . . _ . ~ _ . ~ , r. . ,
SrwE€ d~.~a. ,s, ~ r ! r , a~ . G~' ~ ~ ~ ~r•. . . r~~_. _ ~ y~ .;•c~~~ra rit „ _~'f•la . ~ G~ ,,i ~,~"r r a ~
p4,'~TA~~,~{~DZTRC:D~E - - ~'p 8TATEAIJdZIFC~70E _ PC~ ~'iA'fEANUZ➢P~'.,p f, i~E P T 1 A J47_'Ifa{: l~ P~ STAT~AN021FCG1RE P.9.STATERNC~Z6~'t;~~~~i; OSAE U_E
P05T0.4E ~ POSTAfl£ 3 P()S1~[~~ ' Pb~t+IGf Z PUSTAG~ s S
. . . ~ ~ pS3.sTAGE I _ , - _ I EER~iFI~O ~EE g GERTaFlED ~EE RTPFIEp~~ t CE4~IIFE~q ~ ~EA7IFIElI~EE E ~
~F~fiIFIEp F~E t - - - _ . e _ _ 'SFF.CI~L ~OELIh+~RY ~ 5AE~IAL tJEL➢4E~Y c ~ 6PECrAL b~IIUERY - - - ~ P€CIAL b UV Rv ~ 5pEG~~~ [}EL~VEQY » 5i'ECIA! ~~1.1U~~Y JU ERY t
~ S € ~ t ~ E t ~ REST?~ICTEGC~fC1YE~~' ~ESTI~IGT~G4~CLl~ER'! c - ~ ~ RESTI~ICTE4(7£LY4'EiiY t RE'SiRPCTED~E6~Y€pY ~ ~ ~ RESrRICYED0El1VEr~v qES~'RiC7€dCrEtlvERr e ~ ~ 1 DEUSrERY t
~ - - - - - ~ ~ - ~ ~ i ~ , - - ~ ~ ~ o V~w~~+ ~n[~ c ~ ro w+wM ~,ic;~ ua 5Hl}wV Q Wr i1Wt ~I11 ~ p~ vs w SH~W . 4f~li7h~' ~hI~1 ~ uu ~UVa ~~~hr~1~ , ~N ~NqW 1 w~' P~ L++IENE~7 VYKM MVC YEHED
~ c~'.y l1~~iDf,~+iE1~C ~ ~ ~~C~',.iV~A6C' r,~ vt ~HpYdfilivYFI~1M+~k~: ; ~ ~ ~tFI~IiUE~EyP F s~,TF w• s ~ii r- ~ ~j ~ r~ ~ ~ DF~ dEaEdJ ~ ~ ~ '!AiE Il~l iVEA~~i ~,y ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ _ ` ~ ~ - - _ 7J ? ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ r; . ~ ~ ShE04M i~ IV~I^^t6~1. QATr ~~~HqW T!1 YVfHf~IW, phlF Ss~~IY 7~i 4~N ~ a; ~ 'S r ~ ~,~,~y ~,H~ TfJ VhIQhG, ~ t, u~k ~.,MQW Y(~ VfIfUM 'M+UM DATE
~ A~f+r,~lC~H~r+S w ~Nf~~iAp~~SSQ~ ~ cn _ OM U, . # ~ ~ ~HDWT~NHUkI [~tE ~ ~,NpnL~aFS3d~ ~ ~NI~AUF~ESik~ C1F ~ t rn ~ NJ~74~1~14E5~Of r'a Ahrt9A°JI~'~~E~S~1F t ~ fMf,IJWf~Au ~ ~E~~wE4iY ~ ~~W~A1' ~ . . l vf tYEl~4€nY ~ ~ f E§y OF ~
~ ~ ~ ~ i 3FI,11~p4 ~f ~ [3El.wdERv ~ ~ u+ ~ w`~!~~~'~ 3[1 A1+aQN AfZ~" DA~ u~i 5'ff„~~' i p~IIi~M AN~ a0.1~ ~ Q~. - _ w ~Fltll~ WIa41N ~ry f1~1E i~i~}i~ StP W14AI~ ~Ii~O G~1E ~ s ~ ~ a u+ yHOY~f T'~ +WidM Apol F& ~ E ~ u'~°Z 5ulIW f~i Y~11M1N~ Alilri ~A? aa ~ Fl~~`~EdW;FMAISFAp~E] r ~ :~'~.I.iVEAti~4N1f~IAES~~tICT~U c 3 ~ .r A ~ U:LwVC .pWfh'f'AE'stF19CT£ s L~l!V€~IEC1'~ITlIAESiAlCT~ W'd}}f4#d A/I€} DAtE ~ ]WITH PESTAICTE a
~ ~ , . o~ ~ Z ,S ~ „ C ~ 11E~~','EREIJWIP~+¢~,'A~r~EI . 3 ~ [`fLIVERE~W't~1RE5Pp+G7E c ~ i1'~' 07 ~ ~ I.I'Jr`_~Y LL~~'EN'r E~lr ~ ~ ~ ~ [7~1I E C~ ~ rc ~ ~ l+FI.~{Hr - ; :7CL~NEHY ~ ~ * ~
~ ~ x ~ - SM{li"i ~ G WHI}J~E ~➢F d~i~ ~ 5H{lY+' F~ Y4lNON ik~i E AhdC ~ ,r,~i~~~, ~ - o,. . ~ ~il~W T~] MMfil~ UAFfi- AGY~' ~ 4iii~M ~el Wf#I~M. UJ~~ t Alf~l ~ ~ ~J WIi~M ~ ~ ~ ~ r. 11dT{ A't~~ ~tl~lU ifl W~ii~~l [Y4~E Rk0 ~ ~ k~LAY'N~1~1 t r. ~ E;RY iNi1h ac ~pHESS ~F ~€U4FRY W"I1~# ~ ~s A[~f11~Etay flF DEL4~YE~1' VMItH c ~ ~'i ~ N]IJRES~ 4t I1E! I ~ ASI~ft~„5 ~lf i!E l~Yr PFS{~II:w~I1~Fi~1~'f~i'~ ~E11AW.~I~fFY7EiIN~k'I o~ D~1lif;~SUf ~1ElIV[r~Y'IMVI~ ~1f1t~AESSu1411~11V't~!4'WITh E AES~k'C'ED[fk,:k~Vf^" Hf5TH1LiE~l?E~IWEA7" WHUM, DATF Altf! iF mwrx m7w 9 ~D u( LIAP N
~ _ ~ - - ~ ~E$3PICTt~a~~,,~`fid+' ~ ~ iC51H~G1F~6~E~.1VF.RY ~ - ? T r ~ - ~ i {~T~41 ~St'AO,E A~ii11 F~E~ S ^ T~?TAI, P45TIl ~5 f , TOTAE PpSTAl~ ANa F~ a' °~OTAE iA~I3ST~40E ANQ ~ T~T14~ ~0'~iA~#E ANQ FEES I FEEs ~
~ ,~f, ~ S - TQTA4A4STA4E,~NafEfB 3 ~ ~.f_~ ~ _ ~ P[35T ~ ~q~~~ ~ ~ P4S1~f! b~dT ! ~ ~ - - - - _ - ~ 5 ARR f}H . ~ P05TIh1ARK DR ~AT~
,r ~i n PC►STINAM[ OR t~+ifiE G ` o r. PO TIN ,y ~ A ~ a,~. . I'~t < _ ,~r , . ~ ~0&TIMARK C1R ~A1'E ~ ~ ~ ,r.M''- ' ~ ~ ` ~ f ~ G }l~ J~ ~~i ~ - - '~r:' . 4fi~tl.~~'•_ ~ u~~i ~ ~
C~ ~ ~ ,~1y~y . . . ' 7~ !~r "c~, .~y~ - . .'~J, Cq ~v i ! . Ss' l J' { } . . . ' I ~ i Ni ~ " 6 fFr ~ ` U . ~ , M . _ . S.. ~ y ~ ~ ~ . ~ , i ~ ~ r ~r'i. 1 C. ~ ~ ~M n9 ~ . ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ 'l~ o
~ ~ ~ i : y n~~°ay~ . ~ ~r ;4 ~ ~ _-y F+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦y. ~ ~ J Fe , , ~ 1~ ~,M~ ~p L ~ ~ ~ ~ 4'1 ~ t ' r ~ ~ ~ M~ I J \ 1~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ S r ~ a 1 ' ~1 _ ~ _
'J., ~ i R ~3. ' i_ _ 1ir ~7 A, ' a G ~i •s i ~ _ U4 ~ a ' y • ~ . . ~ ~ _ ~ ' - p v~ ~i ~ ' - ~ ?n ~ ti ~ ta. . ~
I _ - - ~ -
~ _ ~ • ';~'t
' ' .+~i!•
~ , . . •
. ~ ~ • _ _ . ~b i ~ • .
, . . ~ " gt .loaeP
No R T
` ► : 144 PTi~~► y()41
~ t ~l 11 ~ j ~ ' . ~ •1
~ j ~ ..(l .
~ •I• it ' .01
I •O/ ~ ~
; ' , R~~ a `
~ : 't~► ~ ~ (1t : ~ s~ ~iGlfi
~ ' u. - ' . . ~
, r 7.+i~ r,,,. , • .
. . . ~ J~~~ . . . • . ^ . 4"~
~ •1
~
L y+~ , • e' • ~ , ~C~'~ ` " ~ , ~ ~
s
1ZQ . .
f ~
ZE I - ~ 79 77
,U ~ ~ .
0
0- } {
~ . ~ , W
. ~ ~ ~
1 v - + ~
.•N~ ~ ~
' + ~ ~1 . . ~ G svrl►t P4W h~ . ~
T~ ~ R~ ~ . Xp ,
~
►o~A 1 v 4 D~LfiI~_
~ - ~ - . ~ 5-- ~ •
L ~ 1 ,~x.%~► A ~
, IA 7~ - . . . ~ . ~ . .
~ - ~
~L ' - ,
' • ! - ' ~ 1,.. • Qn ~
„ ~
• ~ • _ 4
li,VQ' '
- - ti
. ' ~ p
, r 4 1 . -p►
~ .A-Y`~ ~ - .
(X
O
~ ~ ~ • . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
, • ' 7 ~ N
12 - ~ • } E
• : ~ 11 ~ 1`J0O ~ 3
~ ~
~ A✓L• i . _ .
~ ~ ~ ► t int jA . . ~ n ~
' ' , • ' ~ l~~ lfl~~ ~~~~~~1
' t t _ ; w
Lr,.
• - ~ ~ ' ~r
` . . ~ ~ _ .
M ' ~ t ~ _
, ~
~
l #
STAFF REPORT
[]ATE: JAN1JARY 10, 1980
TO: HEARlNG EXAJVIINER COMMITTEE
FROM; PLANNING DEP,4RTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZQNE RECLASSIFfCAT10iV NUMBER: ZE-177-79
1. GEiV ERAL € N FQRMATION APPtICANT: B & K Partnership
STATUS OF APPL#CANT: Furchaser
PROPERTY OWNER : Kivett and Brer-kenridge
REQUESTEC3 ZQN4NG: Rests^icted lndustrial
EXISTING ZONIhlG: Agricultural .
PROPQSED USE: War°ehouse and industrsal buildings
P ROJ ECT LDCATI C7N: Generai ly located on t}~e west s€de of .
Tschirley Raad, apprQximately 440 feet nvrth ❑f Daltan Auenue.
~
11. SITE PLa4N f NFORIViATION
SfTE SIZE: APProximately 14.6 acres
fi
SITE CHAF2ACTERiSTICS: The site i5 flat and contains several
structvres
NEiGHBGRHOOp CHARACTER: The area is in a transition from Agri-
cultural and Residential to fndustrial.
.
LAND USE; Site Single family, outbuildings
Narth UndeveEoped
East Mini-s~orage, singie family, undeveloped
West Undevelvped
Svuth Single family
~ONlNG: North Agricultural, esfiablished, 1958
East Restricted Industrial, establishecf, 1972 '
1Nest Agricultural f establishecl, 1958
Sauth Restricted Industrial, establishedt 1976
w
~
a -'D
FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE
J •~1 I~; 'K ~
~ ~ ~ N. 811 Jefferson
. . f,
456-5786
SPOKANE
, WASHINGTON )0221 99260
. December 27, 1979
SPOhANE COUnTY COURI 310USE
T0: FRED DAYHARSH
PLANNING DIRECTOR
FROM: LLOYD DYKES- ~
FIRE MARSHAL
RE: , ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS FOR JANUARY 10, 1980
Adequate water for fire~protection and distribution of such water
shall be required and approved water plan is required prior to any
land development. The above requirements shall apply to the following:
ZN-134-795 ZE-177-79 `--ZE-252-79 ZW-172-79 ZE-232-79
ZE-242-79 ZE-257-79
LD/ba
. ~
• ~
~ -
~
v
J ~
4N
pCqNN/spoo~ 1980
NANF .
G ~ fP ~O(/NTY ,
Rr~yFNT
. ~
. r.
- • - - . - - - , ~U-~.,~
S~
5POKANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTIAENT
R EACIE911P%rE D • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
JAN 81980
SPOKANE COUNTY January 3, 1980
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Marcia Raines
Zoning Administrator
Spokane County Planning Cotmnission
Second F1oor Broadway Centre Building
N721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Ms. Raines:
The following Zone Reclassifications have been reviewed
for fire protection:
ZE-177-79 B & K Partnership
ZE-252-79 Groesbeck ,
AZ-172-79 C & T, tnvestments ZE-232-79 Fields"
. , ZE-242-79. Sullivan Group . .
ZE-257-79 Hillstead & Ko-to Investments .
Mains and hydr`ant~s', need to b- installed it1 this area.
Access plans for firefighting equipment aroundithe
building shall b'e approved prior to,building p&rmit
,
issuance. °
S,~
; ,
.
Lt. of In~~~ttb-f§°-+'~
AC:sn
PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES
. , f.~
~ , -
~ . ,
1 I
~ I I 1 M ~ .
• ,i _ .^Y _ " ,~r~r.+ `,A -`-•h. • • •y~t ..y,.
j~-~' F+~•~4 ^As.~' ~
i I
R$al ES~~ie OI'0k6TQge DiViSior1 • VO[I$y B1'artcfk ~ . ,
.
.I DeCEmbEr 28, 1979
~
.
' , , • ,
~
MEMOR14~DUM
TO: Residents and Property Owners
FROM: John D. Kvneri' Cansultant to B& K Partnership SUBJECT: Rezone of Tract 84 and the easterly pflrtivn of Tract 71,
West Farms Irrigated Tracts from Agriculturai', to Restricted
Industrial
On January 10, 1980, the Spvkane County Flanrairrg Corrmis'sion will
cansider rezone requ,est , ZE-177-79, ,Agricultural to Restricted - _ .
Industrial for a 14.6 acre parcel on'the west side of TschYrley
Road, approximately 440 f eet nor~~ of° Dalton Avenue.-T~e submittal
includes a plot plan of a typical ware,housing development, an
Environmental Cheekli~t,' photagraphs, and comrnents~j frorri'. governrnental .
agencies, The submitted plot plan indicates 13 industr~zAl_.8ites ~.or
buildings on the 14.6 acre parcel., The deveIopment of ,the site would ,
be res~ricted by the deuelopment and pe,rformance standards of the Restricted Industrial zonetwY~ich iz,t~ypica~, of sim~.lar rezone requests
in.the= area.
' .
If you have questians concerning this pr6p9sal, pleas'e-leave am6ssage
or contact me at 922-1300. ' .
Sineerely, , l1..+•' ~j~ 1I. . .
~To n D. KDnen, Coflsultant ,
. Ti~e W. Main Corporation ,
kr " .
cc file ' .
;
East 12706 Nora Avenue • Spokane, 1IVashington 49216 • 922-1200
~
I~'j • , ,
i ^ •
- ~"`~_-t - • ~ ~ i~l \ ~~i~ !\I~ ,1 \ I
PLANNIlVG DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JcFFERSON STREET
.
PHONE 456-2205
° D',1~ S } ,
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
- S-w► . . r.'st~ _ - . , . , . .
SPOKANE COUtiTY COJRT PtOUSC
File # ZE-177-79
Section 6 Township 25 Range 45
.
Classification: Agricultiral to Restricted
I ndustrial
Application Title: 8& K Partnership 14.6 acres
T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N
yKROPOSED yfVON-SIGNIFICANCE
DECLARATION OF
V41 N A L SIGNIFICANCE
1. Description of Proposal: Proposed 13 industrial buifdings, comprising 210,000
square feet floor area, percent of open space (includes parkway) 67$, 500
parking spaces provided. Single story building, not exceeding 35 feet in
height. Off site roadway improvements to be specified.
2. Proponent: 8& K Partnership
3. Contact Person : John D. Konen . Phone : 922-1300
4. County Action Requested : Zone Reclassification
5. Location of Proposal: West of Tschirley Road, East fo Spokane Industrial
Park. In the Spokane Valley.
6. Lead Agency: SPOKAN E COUNTY, WASH I NGTON
This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on
the enviranment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c).
This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environ-
mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency.
7. Responsible Official:
Proposed Declaration: Final Declarati .
Name: Fred L. Dayharsh Name: Chair
Si nature: . v
g Signature.
~
Title: Director Title: Chai °man
Dept: Spokane County Planning Dept. Dept: Heari xaminer Committee
Date: December 26, 1979 Date: January 10, 1980
\$o
~l~
v'. . . . .
b
0 16~athdru
E A
Newman j:-r. . -
. . ~ laMe ~:y : . : . . . ~Nayden lake . .
~ , '.i . . . ~ . . . .
• ' . ~ "1 ~ • . ~ ,
~ - ~ Fioeur
. .
A lene
Lake
Llbert ~ Coeur
Lake d'Alene
Spokane Aquifer Study
N. 811 letterses SpoAane, WasMin4tom 99261 (509) 456- 3600
APPLICANT: '.1~/~ ~~-►'~'.,cr~t'l-► ~ .r~ ~-/'7~'l- 7~°J'
. . . ti
' LEAD AGENCY :
COMMENT DUE DATE :
. ~
Comments on Proposed Action:
In order to facilitate our review of projects for their conformity with the
'208' Recommended Actions we have developed the'following checklist. The
checklist is based on problem areas addressed in the Water Quality Management
Plan. •
This proposal includes an aquifer penetration which does not conform to
~ Recommended Actions. 2 his proposal includes activities which may generate solid waste or sludge
~ which could pose a disposal problem.
The proposed solid waste/sludge disposal methods are inconsistent with the
~ Recommended Actions.
2 This proposal recommends ground injection of untreated stormwater runoff.
~
2This proposal includes too little or no open space to accommodate use of
~ grassed percolation areas for stormwater runoff disposal.
12' This proposal includes activities which may result in spills of critical
b materials in the course of storage and handling.
Spill prevention and clean up measures do not conform with Recommended Actions.
~ .11TIhis proposal may require the transport of critical materials. Precautions
o which conform to the Recommended Actions need to be taken.
' This proposal provides for disposal of sanitary waste using methods inconsistent
. with the Recormnended Actions.
, - .
Comments on Proposed Actions cont.
-2-
This proposal provides for a type or density of development inconsistent
~ with the Recommended Actions for the location indicated.
This proposal is not consistent with the Recomruended Action of encouraging
fill-in development.
~This proposal does not mention the Recommended Action of double plumbing
~ and stub-outs to the appropriate property line.
This proposal does not mention the Recommended Action requiring covenants ,
or deed restrictions £or grading, drainage or site plans.
~ This proposal should be located outside the Aquifer Sensitive ea. _
.
.
✓-'This proposal should sub ite,-£or approval, storage, spi11 control,, rainage,
f ire prevention, and clearrup plan
~is prop e osal should inc u a°' r ention and/or detection provisons
including impervious containment provisions.
J-"T'*his proposal may use chemicals that need special containment provisions.
D
,
,
.
►
~
y
. . . . ~+T ~
- ' ~~`3►i ~ , ` ~ ~ ' ~ ~ \ I ~ ' , ~ 1~~( ~
. - . I .
- ;i•:, i • ' -
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
itp; ! 8R0ADWAY CENTRE F3UILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
'PHONE 456-2205
•~s,,,• .I~• ~ ~•r a a..
7 4
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
• . . . .-r• t: - : - , , r!. . • • •
SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE
CURRENT PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
TO: 1. Department of Ecology 2. Social & Health Services
3. Health District 4. Audubon Society
5. KREM TV 2 6. /Mr. Ray Card, 208
Coordinator
7. Consolidated Irrigation District #19 8. Fire District #1
9. SCAPCA
FROM: Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99260
(509) 456-2205
Attention: Marcia Raines
REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review
Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached.
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Depart-
ment, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the
. County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the
following project: B&K PARTNERSHIP ZE-177-79 John D. Konen
This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. '
Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to
be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040
(4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)).
Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided
in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on
December 26, 1979. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before January 9, 1980.
The subject proposal or action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE
VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED
BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY '208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as
to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be prepared.
A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1980, to be held in
Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson,
Spokane, Washington.
Enclosures
Rev i sed 12/1 /79
• - ~
PLANNIlVG DEPARTMENT
- ~
'Fi le # 4&X6L47ZV%RE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
Section 6 Township"IL) 4s6-R~f~ge 45
11 f'T
' . _ _ . . . . . Classification: Agricul'tiraI I to1~estricted
SPOKANE COUrtTY GOURT HOUSE
I ndustrial
Application Title: B& K Parfinership 14.6 acres
T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N '
~OPOSED ~-SIGNIFICANCE
DECLARATION OF
FINAL 51GNIFICANCE
1. Description of Proposal: Proposed 13 industrial buildings, comprising 214,000
square feet floor area, percent of open space (includes parkway) 67$, 500
parking spaces provided. Single story building, not exceeding 35 feet in
height. Off site roadway improvements to be specified.
2. Proponent: B& K Partnership
3. Contact Person : John D. Konen Phone: 922-1300
4. County Action Requested : Zone Reclassification
5. Location of Proposal: West of Tschirley Road, East fo Spokane Industrial
Park. In the Spokane Valley.
6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c).
This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environ-
mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency.
7. Responsible Official:
Proposed Declaration : Final Declaration :
Name: Fred L. Dayharsh Name: Chairman
Signature: Signature:
Title: Director Title: Chairman
Dept: Spokane County Planning Dept. Dept: Hearing Examiner Committee
Date: December 26, 1979 Date: January 10, 1980
Revised 12/1/79
~~'~~u~4'~ °`J;tk, , • . , ~ i . > ' • . , ~ ~ 1
'2 j~
,r F' '1 • • ~ r , , ; ~1{ t ~ 1; . , ~ 1 I
i;Z n • i 4 ,1 . . 1
i ~t4y":+ . ` . ~ - ; '~•r ~L.;~ i~' • ~ , 'i.? , ' j
• ~,'f?r~ ~ , A , ' . . ~ ' ' ' ' ,
r . , • : , ' ~ r; . ~pQ3~.Z1~ ~t~~T~~iT":' c~' ' zE ~ .
File
sqC. -Twp ;-R9e •
~ , , . Et1YiROKME!lTAI CKCKLIST
. ,
• ; . . Introductio : The Staq fnvironaental Poltr/ Act at 1971. Chapt~ 43.21C. RC1i, nqulrea sll stat• and lacal qover-na+ental
` •genctes consider Nnrtronmtel values both tor tM/r cMm sctlont ind when 11Censlnq privats proposals. Tho Act also
nquires thlkt an Envirorrmntal Impact Statonent be, pnpei^ed tor ell ajor acttans slqnltlcantly (aed "adversely", as per
• WAC 197-10) atfecLlnq ths qwllty of Lho physical onvircrimt. The purpos• of this cMeckllst if tro hlep the agi++cies 1n-
valved esterming whethar or not e propoial is such a mjor act1oA,
, Pl"se ansmr' tht toltowing questions as tamp1e41y as you can with th• lntara+attan pnsentiy avatlable to you. Pleaie u+swer
•q+rsstions at 'yts" or "maybs" tt, in your optnlen. even only illqht IaQacts w111 rqult. The rtvtawars of th• checkllst wiil
be awars of aa4 cprtclrq tMaastivh r+ith the de of iapact, tsking yeu for more intormatton. 1f necessary. '•Ih*re expltnatlons •
. of your •nsw4~ arq r~equired, or whtr~ you believe an txplanatipn aould be helptul to govKnmenC dattstcn-+nekers, intiuds ycur
•xplanaelao tn ttN space'provlded, or 4sR 4441ti n 1 2Am , 1f n*ceW&n►. You aKOuld include rehrences cq any reports or
ituQl4s of which yau an awaro and whlch ars n tvant Utt aeswri you provide. Compiste antran ta these Quastions n4w w111 help 411 agMC1" lnvqlved r1t,l1 yeur propOSal to underteke Che rpviro tnvlromsyntal nview without unnKssaary dildy.
Th• tplloring qwlstions apply to your toul propasat. not just La the 1lcense Ior ah1ch you are eurrently applying or thR Or'o-
posal tor rrhich apprewl is seught. Your anzxers should 1nc1u0R t?tt inpacts vrhtch wtll be ciused Oy your prooosai when 1t is
campieted. even thouqh completton nuay not occur unt11 somtlrtr 1n tho tuturs. This w111 allow ait of the agqnetes w►hicr wili be involved to SompietR thefr environoent&l revier ncw, rlttwWt duplititing pqqsrwqrk in Chq fuWryt.
Na aADllcatian 4Ai11 be procassb until Che checklist has bt*n coaiplsted and retyrned to tris apprapriaGe Caunty departastnt.
ta laim+ r~In r exoldne tpns far av4ry es° end an~~r en t~• ch 11 . The p!►ioi~ canploRinq th# torm rnty.1~ ' r~qu rQ pr~4yl~~0x,p ~net Ons Or n-a"answ+~rs. an soar .Caset. rtqre te intomatipn to aiO 1n•A thmhold '
. , ' NM; Th1s i= ;;tandard forei bting used Dy all staU and lacel aqencifs in Ch• Stato of Wsshingtan for wr/out cypes of • " prcpossI e. Way of the Qwaticns amy not appty CO your proQosaix If a 4wtftion do" rtot epp1Y, ju;t answer It "lc" _ end canttnot Cn to the neuct 4wstton. , . ,
, ENYIRW
^FfTAI, GIftKLIS7 FOaM
1. BACKGROUNO , ` .
1. N#,pe v,l, Proaore"t: B~ Partner,sh4p Phone Ntwqer 2. Addrafs o! Propanlnt: c J. K. one 12706 E. Nora AveSpokane, WashinR„t„o_n 09216
' 3. Qlts Chsck 11 St Subaif t ~
4. Agency tt~equlMn Chetklist: '
4
5. Naue of Propoi; , it Appl icab)e: '
6. yacure artd dr1ot 04acr1ptian of qhe Oropasa rtc ua n9 ut not m ted to tac s,•eg~~UDml~L9ec~ 'La~+t~Ca
. o;her tacton that wi11 give in accursto understandinq o1' its scope and Mturo): YP aff dey.elopment
. plan indicates 13 industrial buildings on the 14.6 acre sitecQmprising Z10,,OQQ sq. ft, of floor area. The project, with access via Tschirley Rd, cquld be '
.
. . 5V;i' by a private or public road system depending on future plats.
. . . . . . , .
. 7. l.ocation of Proposal (describe, the physlcal seiting of tRe Prooostl, as we11 at ths lxtont of thi lAnd 4rea.affaCLed-Dy
• any snvironmntal lmpicts. lncluptp~ any other. 1nt rnytion o ed tq ivo an acCu u~ +Cst~ qg~qf CA~ envtrt~ri- ;
. mMtal 3itting of th• proposal): lne pro~ec~ 1S Sl~U3t6~ W@St O~~SCI11r'le,y tid, eaSL Of •
the Spokane Industrial Park. The site is centered on the floprJo,f'the Spokane
Valley, relatively flat, and well drained. TWo houses ocGupy the propertv. and
. will be- aremoved before dq t f . . , , . . - . , , • 3. Estiaytod Oate for Complecion of the propQsai: 1,98 '
. , 9. List ot ail Pemtts. Ltcsns4s or Gpvernsnent ApProWis Qe4uirRd for qi• PrqOqs4l (federal. ltatq &0, lo0l • in;lwaing', , r.:onss - okane .
. ,
County Building Codes Dept. Sewer permits - Spakane Countv Health District' .
( tF SPACE F4R EXPl11MAtIW1 13 IMAOEQUATE. PL.WE AZ'fACH ApOITI0M PA6ES. ) ~.10a. Do you, or t1io orinv in ths evMt you do not arin the subject land, havt 4kny plarts 'fOr, futurt aQ4ltions, exp4rti/on. 4P
' turtntr tctivity roiated to or connectod wlth this proposalT I/ yos, txplain:
NO - Ownership iA.Sconfined to zone chanR'e request.
. • , , - - - . lOb. 0o you awn or hav options on land nearby or aQjactnt W this proposal's loc,ation? It yes, uplain: ~
11. po you knoM of any plans by othQn includtng Ghe a+ner whlch mY atfect the property covered by your proposal ar land
adiec.nt or n"rbyt It ys, explain: Yes- Inland Asphalt Company contemplates sand and
' rlyel o,~„pera i4YL Su1..pC'.QBgE.trleSti2_.h . Pa Qr.
12. attach any othar appiiatlcn torn+ chat has btin camQieted r"ard1ng th• prvaosal; it non• nas oeen comoleted. hut is
expRcted to be t11ed at som tuturs date, describe th• nature of such appiicatton form:
NONE
II. ENVIRONWENtAI IMPACTS
' (Expianatlans of all "yts" and "rsqybt" answrrt ara required)
Yes Kaybe No
l. Earch. w111 thw proposal rosult 1n: •
(a) llnstable esrth conditions or in chanqea in 9eologic strucwres? . . . . . . . . .
(b) 0lsrupttcns, 41s01acanents, camection or overcoverinq of the soil? . . . . . . . - X _
(c) Chanqa in topography or grounn surtace relist teatures? . . . . . . . . . . . _
(a) The destruction. tovering or iradltlcatlon of any unique geoloqic X
or physical teatures? . . . . . . . . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • _
(e) Any increase tn wina or water aroslon of soils, aither on or ott the site? _
, . , ~
,
'n] 4k ~ . . i ; l ' .1~~'',r . ; 1 ` r ~.~t H t:~ ( ' i, `'j'•,~,~~ 97' , ' , ~ . • . , , ~.'}~Iti~,: 3:. r.~' ~ i i ~ ~ ia
,i . {'f~ ~ Ir/ 1 , 11 1;~ 1 :•1' 1~~.4:~ ~
Pi Ji,
_p,~+n
+ 'S i'f , t' `1' ' 'c,c, • , ' ,''7', .1\ `C r T ';}1M!~~F~TQA ~Il: 40 nT► -[fl.q~/~.7~ 'A~!~,L~1 ~AWI7 IVti ' '.4MiS. ) `i • R ' ~ * : ~ ~ ' , . ' . I. .i 1 • I . . r . . i . .
l i~!' . ' . , . : ' .
i.(1!) qanges ,in depasltto~} or troston of bt~cA sands, qr chang~ts tn siltattor~. .
• ' cfsposf tf on"ar erosloa wbl ch may eqd! ry the chan~l of a ri vRr Qr stram
. • , , . t or pN"!qd Of,. tfi• iwAan 4^ any b{iyr In1e1t or tiko1. . . . , : . . . . . . .
, . • - , , - . , • -
, . : tan ttan:.•: -C
q• `yd. . 1 . . • • • ' r ^ ' - '10t''-deveYopmentw and oUnda .i on,sAnd, C1 nnr4 nf _tuiLI_d_z_n~a
' .i r , • ' . . , . .
~ . . • -acaping' Wi11 AU'~~nicantlv reduce~ WI l11~d watrar PY'[1Ql ~1n
v~ . . . . A" , . . , , •
• , jr • , , , • 2. Atr. Y111 th1 propo"l rasult 1n: ~ ~ 3. .
(a) A1r esl#sions or atarloratior+ of 44iont •1r qwlltyt • • , • • . • • • • • X
• , • . (.b)' 11t• crMe1Qn of gb~~t1otubte odonl . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . .
X
(c) A1 t.eratlos qt al r aovowt. mai swn or tWRrstwm. 9r any chanqo f n
c11~t4. t/th~+r loC~lly or+ r~gi4nally; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
x 1 1 og,: ,
other industrial developments. Restricted Industrial zone clas ' • . . ' prohibits activities causina air
' 3. U.M. w111 tpp Prqiasal naul t t n: • ~ K -
'(a) Chartp 1A Cw*wts. or tlse, toun• os dirqttl0n Ot Is4r aeYowts. • . X
. in 4kitMr oar4ne cr frosh wtaqt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) ;hanqts in absarptlaA rstes, drain,tge oAtterf, or Che rtte anQ X . 4ottllt Ot suP'{i4a Mot4r rVnotf? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) A1teratiQns Cp, ttN ca4rjo or fia at nopd waten? . . t . . . , . . . . • ' , ~ '
(d) Ghan40 1n tfM Am04nL, 01' sWface wfqr 1n aaY watar body? . . . . . . . . .
tnto :urftu wtlr, vr 1n tny alte+r'ation of surfact water -
(e) Qlscharge
' qtyllty, includlnq bvt rtpt 11n1tso tq tMiRsmZuro. dittolvsd . •
"Y9m or tvftt qt tyt . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . .
' 4tf A1teritl4n of to1 41rtcttam or rj;a of f1qM at qr"d ++4ttn? . . . . . . . . . . .lP1. . ~ •
' ' . ( A) GDenq* In the qanti ty of gowld wtAws. •i glier LArouqA dt r.~ct . . . ,
. ' addiNvns or wltti4rewals, or-Chroyqh 1nterctptlw+ Qt an . , •
aquitar 4y C443 ar exuvetton$t . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . „A,. ~ •
• (h) t1+t4ri0rstlor tn growad wter awiity, elthwr throuqb 41reCt . . , ; . • ; ' ,
• , fi►'jKt1on, aR throuqtf CM a!lpage o} 11Mtfatt. PhosOates. • • , ' : " , ,
' . doter"nts. wtRr00me virW Or baCtK'1a, or o4hlr 5ubltinCtt
tnto th! goW+d wtRrs? . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , ~ • ~1) geduction 1n Lhs aasunt 4i woLRt Qomviae ipa11ab1e tor
• • pLoitC watN' suRPl1q#? . f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . x n c n : P
r. . y , . m , ,
water.. plan. ade uate to accommodate surface run off on sit',e is re u r. d'b .
~
Spokane County Engineer's Office ~rior to development.
. fi .
. ' , . . . . 4. 411 ll tM Proposs1 rtasu 1 t 1 n: fta
' , - . : " • ' • . . ;
. , (p), C~anq~ 1n oe d1vmtty of specte~. or nu~bor of tny spec1es of
/lora (including W"'~tz.shrubs,qrtaf. ctops, olcroflore 4nd • . . : . . ` , , ,
• • ' : - • ' . 4A+µt! C p 1 antt ) a . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . .
' • .
, yntqw. ritnq oe mdanqen0 • , ' ~ ' ' . . ,
. ' (Q), Moductlon of tw nuftln a1 4kny
IntroQwiia+ of rtm spec1ts of nora lnto 4kn aress or . ' ' ~ , , • i~
tn e oatr-tst' to thl Mp+r~1 rs0lapt;hrnt o1 oxtftinp sAKi«s1 X •
' . ( d ) qaduCF$Qp 1 n fttaqil ot 4nr agr1 cul tura 1 crop 7 , . . . , . . , . . . . . .
, ' • ' , c 1 : T . . . . „'r*-~ .
urbanizin~ portion of the Spokane Valley and most of the native f3,`6r,4 has , .
. . . ~
' been replaced by introduced vegetatian . . . • ' , •
• . . , , r , ti• . . • - ,
, • ~ • -
, S. ¢aun*, yill the propostl mult tn:
(a) ~ Changq in the atv*rs/ty of sRni*s. or nuranr of any spaciss
of tauna (birds. lind &niwls lntluding reptlles, fish aMi
sMlltl=b. OMth1c a*ganisas. tmqcts Or arlcrofsuna)T . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) Reducttorr of tha numers af dny 4nl4Us. rare, or en"ngArb . . . ;
• . , zp.cies of faun,t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' X .
~ . ~
• (c) Introductlon of rtNr sOKies at teyra tnCO an areas or rRsult ' x' .
• tn a'bir*14r to titta migration cr aovWwt o1 feuno1 . . . . . . . . . . . .
, (d) Opterioratton of exitLin9 tish or wii411fe habl4tl . . . . . • • • . • • • • ~
~,l,,,ation: The site is situated in the urbanizing portion of the Spokane Valley.
• Wildlife habitats in the vicinity were previously destroyed b~r a~r„icultural and ,
housing activities. ,
. 6. noi sa. ' Yn ILbl ,vo
(a) w111 th# proyoLal iqcrease axlsting nois• levels? . . . . • . • • • • • • • ~ x
jXylanat,jw., Restricted Industrial zone establishes noise limits. Noise levels
on the site will be compatible with adjoininj~ activities. , 1, liqht and Glare. Yes Mnvoa Vo
(a) 'Aill tha Oroposat produce new 114ht or glaret . . . . . . . . . . . . X
Explanatton: Restricted Industrial zone requires confinement of 1 ght and glare.
Uahtina will be required for securitv purposes.
2 +
, ,
:
rt vi tF ~
tTI~ aa6~s. ) ' j t ~a~ ~ A i T%r 'r~ L • r i` ~~~~T; ~ . ,
''(J~ +~y . . ~ d k . f'°f~ ~ ;7-~ ' ~,~+l: ~r~1~ .,f 'di~ ~i° I 1~•~ii- ~ t , , ~ ` I ~ ~
' ~~r'~. • ' ' . ~ ~ ~ 4 P r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'i t ~ ~ ' ~M 1-~ir ~ r"" N ~ ~ ' ~f, y . i, `~'+H!~ . ~ ~ 1 k' i ~ . ~ .
.f 1 ' , ' . ~ . ~ ; i 1 ~ ~ 1~1 • d~~•~ • ni r•~l ~ . ~ °I F~ ~i~~ ~ ~ f ~ ff ~ J ~ ~ . . ~ ~
,,,~d ! ~10i . . • ,F0! •
ji{l•~ 4 1 , , ~1afl,~~~ ~p~'~.~~ ~ , 1'r♦', ~'r , ~ . • • ' '1 4~
'1.^ • . 8~ r' ~ ~ . •i ' ~ " ~'F' 1 ir' '7 ► ' ~~/v► ' .rri+.r +a~►
dit~.~~f 'p~1t~~:i 'e'..e • . J , r c.~''r.:('°r~t' ."=I . ,
rt1~ il,~, • - r ' , ~ ~ i ' . , ,y 'tl . , ~ i. ~~y . .i ~ r,~ . ,
'"a;•, r~~ ' . ' . , (4) ; , wi t l tne'Dr,ooosai nsul t•• tp ~•41 tar4¢1as Qt t": pr"Nit. ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ' ' ~ - ' ,
, r , planno4'~1tn4 ut4 .gf ~~-~ntaT• t . . . : . . ; • 'X
Area 'is desipated,on comprehensive Olan aa aQpropriate For inus, _
trial ~actiep. '-Adjoiplng ownerships to •the 'eas.t and west are zoned Mstricted ~ . ,
`f . . •
;ndu,,.~tir~~l
a: y"', ~ ~ • . • r . ~ . , . „ . , _ , _ . . . . . : , . , , , . F . r ~ - 90 ~
~ . 9. at 1 RU&g=• yt11 t~ Dropos#1 rasult tr: ~ ~ • - . . . • .Y~
• . ~
' , , . . . • . • • ....w
, . . (a) , Ingw" tn qy aate of uf4 ot loy nstura,j rnomrcRS? . . . , . '
x ~
~ (D) PalletlOA Ot eny nonrenewuble luQYryl rtxqwn#t . . . . . . . . . . ' .
Depending on the type~of firms decidin5 to locate on the-proper~4, -
certain~efirms ma~r have pracep~ which ' natural ~esources to produce ~oo,~s .
and productp - ' '
. ~ . .
I d iQ. Risk ot U., Oo~s tht propos+~1 involw a r~k of ip aplosipn or the • ~ ~ ~ b ~
r~~eaae o hazardoyi lubstaeus (1nt1u01nq. but not liqitsd to, ci1,
oesticldes. Ctrantuls. a► raplatlon) 1n tth wwt of in sccldenf o ' t ' X
~ ~ Mput ~4fN1tlcuta? . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . , . . . .
us materiais
"=Restricted In,dust.rial zone prohibits 8torage of hazarTo _
` . ' r 3~~i~' „ rrii!!w~.. . M.yr~w.. .~!iw!1 . .w}!+4 r ~ . , . • , ,1l , . . . . , ~ 4 . ,
a , . , . . .
. . ~ ' . , a . r ~ . - • ~ . , , . : ~ . . ~ r . ' '
• . . . . . • • • ~ t ~ , ~ ,
~
. . , ~ ~!}~!'1~' . ~'~r!~,S . . . ~!~5 r• . + ' „ • .
~ i l . , P~o~~y~,~~ ~ . , . ' ~ • , ~ ~ . ` ~ ~ N#X~.. No ,
. , . f.
wt11 me p+^apONl aiter tfy loeatiQr+, alstrttiu=IQa, Qmltl►, or pra+iO. - . . ;
r'41II at tIM ►numu! P91041!qf0+4 of 4A arKt .t , . . . . . . . ~ . . . . ~ ~
x~,.~.°.~.: -,~„~~ped at ftillte,ptlal, tpe ~roiect could en ~~^ate 'aQprox- :
`'pproxiimately
imat elX 20.0- jobs 1n , the eanufacturing or warehousing sector 706s ,
~.50 jobs ` ip "the 'of .fice sector ~ ~ ~ . . . , . . . , . . . „
. ~
. ; , _ .
• . . : , , ; . , . . . , i. . , . . . . t: - , . . ~ , ~ s , .
~ Z. Ml~;~ ~ .'~r • . ~ , , . ,
, ~ ~ yl11 the prvpotil •fi+Kt rpitting hawlnQr Qr crta" a dptnq tar X
. ' ~ ~¢A1tioM~ ~1t~?'• ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . ' ~ • . ' . "
.M
If developed ~ at f'ull~' potential, ~aobs $enerated by the~~ect
wpuld plape additional pressure on existing hqusin and~create~a,deman0 fo,.,r
apF roximately 10~0 new housi~ig un-its'in the Spokan' '~Talley'~~~~'„
. +~.w~
13. Tr rj&1iggJS 1 . 1f111 tIM Pr'Q00;#1 r'tlult tn: ~ ~ • ~ , , ' ' No
. • ~a) GM~realaq Q1 addltiqnal vaht~tar aav~Y . . . . . . . . . . , , ~ ' • ~ ~ :
. f.1 t.
(b) gNoGt; o~ IucistlM "rkipg tacttftfet, ar dortn4 far n,r pAcMcinQi
, (C ) , iapatt qon Rx1 svirW "MPof'tatl oA syt Coi?
. , ~ • ~.'~"~'r!' , ~""r'!► „
~ {d) A14rat1qns Lo prsiutt patta*ns of alr;uiatta+ or mvewt ~ ~ , ~F , • ~ - ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ .
ot people artd/Or goo4sT ' . . . . . . . : .
(9) A1 teraClQd}s LA wtsr04nN. ~ r'ii 1 QT a1 r traffi6?
• : . (t) Inc»as• tn "tifc haxsrds ta Vtor v101cliss.
; . o1tycltsts or peoltrl4AS1 . . . . . . . . . , , . , ~ , ~:t;~ . , . X ~
. . . . . , t s . • , Z.qlr,~,~
• ~ E~o~~~et~a,; The proJ ect could provied parking For 550 vehicles ( 210 'es re= quired ) perhaps generating 600 vehicular and, ~ 100 truck tr p, per working~ djy,' ,
at maximum intensity. Roadways to Flora Rd. and Euclid Ave. will have to-be
t1 ra e 't gC ~oc~ate the it~1Creasqd tra ' ic:
la. P~ic ~rvc Q '~iiT~~ProPosai have an tKlct uppn, or ruu~ • , . . ' . . ' Y ~ e ~ No . .
~ in a n~tor nMw or aitered QoYenmntt) serwlm 1n 4ny ot
~
Qf xh• folla►+ing •rtas:.
. . t . : . . , .
( b 1 Pol i c1~ PRIt,RCti an t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . ~ • • ' , _ .
. . c c ) Sc~aat st . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . ~ . . . ' x .
~ . . . . ..~r ".r►
, . (d) Parks qr otl+w mcrtatioMl fKflttlest . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . , t ~ . .
(4) Miintqnumo o! pu¢11y tatiltt/q, lncluoipg mdsi : . , . . . . . . .
(f) Qttw gQvsrwnnul terrtcas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
~lsn~tion: Fire hydrants will be installed on the lQ in~h mair,~~ T~cr h,~.rl~y Rd.
and buildinga built to meet fire code. Additional security including alarm
~ systems wi11 be optional to tenants. An RID or other mechanism will provide
, improvem4~nt fii 59OFORr05kiOM [S SMAQEQUIITE. PIEASE ATTACH ADOtTIOKAI PAQE$. )
15, n M. yi l t the proposal rtaul t tn: Maybe t+o
(a) lJse ot suostantial amunts ot tuel or oneryyt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(b) 04mand upon 4xistlnq sourcts of energy, or rpuir*
, th• Cawlopaient of nw+ souress of erterqyt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
E_,i2nation: If the project is used for warehousine, minimal energy will be needed
to maintain the buildings. The proponent does not, at this time, know if
certain future owners or tenants may require energy in excess of warehouse
ruireme ts.
~ 16. t1 it1qL. W11 th• proposa) r*sult in a nNd for nwr systems. In Mavbe g
pr &iterattons :o th* tqilowieq utiltttot:
Parer or natural ya:? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
(b) Comuntcaticn systewst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(c) wattr7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d) Sewer or slOtle tankst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -
, -
(a) Storm witer Crainags? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. ~
? • i ` . ~
~ • . t ; , ' j 9,",1 . Jl; , , , ~ Y' tl~. .i.. ` • i
~+~r / " . . ~ , ,tb, '~i1!~i+,~'i., , • `t~j • , , . , ' ' .-,.r` . ,
SE ATracH at►. .tUIL PAGES. )
t (IF SAk... FQR EXPL~IIATIOn. 15 Ii'IMQOTE..vLff
°f, ~ • , . (t) Soiid ++asUt aad dlspasal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . , . . . X
Exot,,,anfclon: Power and natural eas wj, 1,1_ne~~,~,xtPndPC~ rr~.,,t~ nr~;P~~ ~Q
, well as telephone svstems. A storm water drainaze nlan wi1~ hP ~A..Ai~noj_ ~
for the site. Q2ntractugl . e t
. disposal'.1 Sewer systems will be installed, per applicable cou~,y r@~ire~ts
17. ' Mu~n tt th.' 'w111 the propasal rtsult in the cnation vf My heaith Maxsrd~ .
. , ` qP pOt~t a hN 1 th hasard ( exC 1 ud1 nq wu+p 1 hM 1 th ) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
' , Restricted Industrial zone prohibits unsafe storage, ter T air, and noise
'po, ution."Industrial safety will be regulated by appropriate state agencies.
. , . . „ . . . . . . ,
. ; , • .
. . , . , .
1~. th 1c . ti111 tfit DrOpmil ruuit 11f tl* Obitrutsl0n Of tny SCMIC v1fU Or
' Ys1 ODln t0 tfu publ f Cs Of ,M111 CM "O"l rssYl t i n t11t 4t'ut10t1 0f ul X
, . , ' , • !"V!tf cot ty aftyi:t rq =t y aw to ou411 c v1 ow1 . . . . ' . . . . . . . • . .
. j~ Q~.Si te is s, tua te d in t he cen ter o f an emerging in dus tri l di s~ r icf.
„ .
. . ,
, 19. ae Mi t i too OrOpoial tisul t in in leq"t iqqf ON awl ity or
, ' Qw~ , q f ~ i f ~1 ~g rsC~l~tt 4n~ t ap~ortw~ i ti e~? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X .
~Project is removed from parks or other recreation fac.ilities: ,
, . . .
~ ~ e • . , . . . ,
' 20. A h oio ic H1 or~i 1_. 11i11 tht proposal rpuit in 4n •lterstlon ot a
. ' • ; ,gqt c,tnt iTi a0 0- ul gr hiftoriui stte. ;cruc,~ura, c0,1"t or Oulldlnql . . . . . .
• i a ont . . , . , . ,
.
. , . . . . . . , , . .
. . . . . , , .
c I I. S I GtiQTM . ~ '
I. qse undefsiqna4, svear unGer tl+e Patalqr o♦ AKjury Lhat LRt abov rQsDo+sos are mwQe truv+taily trta to thl.
ofst ot my krtorlpdgo. I also undsrsueid that, tRould ;nsre be any wtlttul ansrearesMUtlcn or willlui l;ck of rult aiscto:un on nry OaR.sRokang C4urt~ miy n1thQ, 4ny dlclartCf~ Ot narsig,i,ric,~nca chat t~ Ai~nc issue in ;t
rtllartr.p upqp this cMc~Cii:t. ~
, Osts:,/ 7
: 4z
• ' . (P16Se Pttint pr TyPo) ~ G, . . 1 , • ' - . . . • , • P1'OpOQlflt:~ ~id4'M'fs::
-r- . S ;r r ` + , ; Phone: 1340
• , Ptrs4r C~i~tirtg forM; pAQ".:.,..Lr 2 ~ 8M P'tO:~
, „ . . , , , "'R"* • • , • ~ ' , ; ~,4 r ~ I .
t • ' ' - ' •
' ' ' ' • ~
. G"ro~v l~+t or OM1c• 0f C4unty Revlewins Checfcllft: 4 6
. ~ , , , . • , . ~ , ; , , ' Statf MMbor(t) ReviaMing WocJcllst: ' . , , . . . ,
♦ . , , . i . i . _ . . i A , , 1 ' ~ ; ' . • . • ' ,t
. , . . c. , '
. , ' . . . , ' • ' - ~e ' e
• , , ' 9
. ' ` ~ ' '
` , . .
. • . . , ' ' ' • ' , . . ,
• . 1 1 . 4
7 • 17 ' Y • 1 •t ~ ujf.~' ~ i~,j r~ C}d~i:~,h.~7~ ~i'~~~''I',y~'~'7 ~ •
I 6 ' ~ • • '-i~ ' ._[+~'i~.. ~ '74.T•}'~ i~ '9 a, 1" , ' ,
x ~~4 ~6~'~ ~ • ~ ; i .`I'~~ ~1'~ i ~.t-=rv~-.•'~'...s ~~~k~~~..t '1, ~ ~ ,
i~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ;F' . , a~"~~~ "7~~ Y~',"'~s'* Y~'{+;~x."~'~~;^ • ~ I . ~ ~
5 ~ X~„~ •1~ R I ' ~ ' • ' r , , ~ ~ { ~:i r `,Y' i.Y~}~f~iYr .~T'i{.+i .i9' •:i i ~ ` • . , ~ 1
° • 'f: n
;.~i~~. 1~fl _ ~ ' ,1 ~
tt>> c~l. ; ~ ~ _ ~s?~ ~r- .j,P , N,,, ° ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ . . ,
lt~l' ~ i t E ' ' ` " - - -•i`.r
~ ` j ' • , ' , ~ ' . .::a' - + ° 1 i ` ~ ~ ,
'~~1~:: `r ' . . ~ , , ' , ' ~ _ , ~ 4, - ' ,i . n -•4'.' . t`~~°~~'''•-' , ' , ; , , „
' ~ it ~ ~ . ~ •
~~t~~' f!: i- , Ft • ~ . • . - ~ ' _ . , '
'~'~~rJt~r~1r ~ • ' I ~ • ~ ~ ~ ,i ~ ~ ~ a 1 t ~ , ~ , ~
. _ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ 1 •r ~ ~ ~ ~ .
~ ~ #I • • - ~
, `~•..~7~. ~ . ~r.. ~ ~,..,~r ' ' . . . '
~,fS,•Fi ri' ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ R$aI E$tGto BfQ~~~~~~ ~vl#lo.n e Valley BiQriph '
J' •;~~5'17 ~:r'~ ~ i I ' ' ~ ~ . ~ , • ~ ,
~'r ~~'~1 ,~ry', •i ~ ~ Detirp4er ~417 1979 . ~ * .
~ ~ • ~'J ~~'v ,
+ L'I, y'i~ 17 ',i.' ~ ' ~'y~ ,r, , i , •
i ~ ~i! ~ ~'4dN1 5 ~'q`., d! •':C " ~I _ " _ . . ~ `
F+9 ~~4_y7 ~4.i~ba_' ~ ,'7 ~ ~ ~+9F~~ . - Ii~: .i ' ' r . ~ y ~ . + ' {eY. - ' ~ ~
~ ' y ' - ~ . y 'ii .s Y ~1• I ` i . , . . , . I ~ _ • y, ~ . k ~F.4~~' • ~~j
' t{~•~ ir7l''~• ~ ' ~ 1 ~ , ,e+ , . r ~ - _ ~ ,
P-lanning Carnmissiori
N i: :7 ?1 ~~f fersan Street
5p.c~l~a,r~~ ~ W,~~~~qj$ton ~ 99201
r
, ' ~ ` + . ~i. ~ • ~ , ~ ' . • ' ' ~ • , . ' ~
RE; ZE.;177-79' ~ . A4ricultural',,o ~~~tricted In,dustria~ ~ B & K PartnerahIp .
'f i ~ , , ~ ~•ti ~1` a , T ' , ' ' ~ , - ' ' • - ' .
~~~I ften
- • f ~T
~ - , . , ~ • - . . . . . . ~
i ~ . • ' • t ' , ~ ' ' , „ - ~ , . ,
E~~~~a+~.~ ;~one chang+~ submitted an~ bek~alf-,oF, G1enn' i~. I~ivett and
Ch4~°~,e~, ~J, , Breck~;nridge ~'for a _ 14 . 6 acre parcejjn th~ Flora Tnduptrj~.j
A'~ea,,-~east`.~of th+p'5P'flkane Tpdu,4tri,Park. The prajqct is' sirbilar, tv ~ . ' °:1p ~ • , r
~ ~ . other subrqi~tRj,s fa'r, Re;s'tricted ~ Iradustr..fal zoning in the area.
' ' . ~ e` . ' ~ . ~ ~ ' . - ~ . . . . . ' . 1 r ~ • i
~ ~ ~ , ~ i ' ~ ' ~ _ _ `e~ , ' , ' . , , ' { ~ • ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~
,~'"c'.Qnceptua~l~ deve1opment pXar~ baA be~en s~bmjtted, tg'indicate the'most
~intensive captiori~,.for devplopment of tho property fQir the~purposie of
outlining the scopo-of such-a development in 'an eravironmental check-,
- ~
It is conceivable that anpther, , vption could include'at ~ some,
. futqre ~ime, a plat +ta establipAh roada'3 eryir~g' ~r~~dustr~,a~. pa
~^c~~s ~ ,
Zt is erY~~ p mvre ~ike1.tha~~' t
P P 3~ he ~it.e. would be split intQ 2 an r3
,
~ ind-ustrial awnerships with +~ach owner* cr~n~'orrnir~g tp the'provis~~,q~s
' the Restricted Industriai zone arnd Oo~~ty development restr~ctiop~~~.~:.
It zs important that sufficient inveratory of FQned industrial laxiq-Pm~.
available in the Spokane.~~1jey to all'ow fQr the uzex' whe+ has tha7 ~ .
s ea~r to become estab1
~ ~ ished i-n A suitab1e facility.- The submit,ted , • '
p~an af'fers the flexibi].ity of grouping induatrial sitest ~l,irninat3~
- `
.
, , , • certain building si tes, or moy~nj~ buijd~ng sitep ~rithv~t r~ec,ea~~=~~.1y.
. rt. . causing a s~i~ificant change, : ~
I#' yvu ~ave anY additianal estic~r~slea~e canta
~ ru, , ct me at 922-~1~Q.0
, . , _ • ~ ' . ~ ~
, , • . . . , ; ~ ,~r ~ . • . : ~ ' ' ,
, • ~ . ~ ' • . ' ~ `'i-}
• I, S' e } , d x~ ~ e ' , ' r ' . .1 ~ '•i • , ' ~ ` , i' '
'li.~. , ! ' - . , , ~ . r ~ y ,'•i ' 1"
QhI1 D. KOZ"1~'..I7 , ~ronsl.llti3n~'.
C E
k1"
~ . ; - . . E - ~ '
, ~ , f • .
DEC 1~1 I~1;~
, . . . .
~ . . . ~ ~ . ~ . SPO~iANE GOUNI~Y , . ~
~
P~.~lN~lIl~Q DEfARrtMENT , . `
Eas# 12 ►~Q6 h+lorc~ Avenue • Spvkona, 1~1~tshingion 9~?210.• 922-'~200
. , . , ~ .
4
1
--Y-~-------_. ~ .
• ' •
- ~-'-5 M t~l l.1 R T - ' $t
f w C~~r►.N~try
h4OA T N
, -Ga ' ~ ~tt► , t ~'t1~; L.~`
~ • ' t
u ~ , , v-`' ~1
~ ~ ~ ; a~t, . . ~ , • r - . ' !
. , ; ~ • ~N4 ~ r- • ,
.
. .a' ' - .n R
t~ • ' w ~ ~it:'~, - ' qYE .
r ~ l ) t~,~,~. , • I _ 1 v~- . .:1
, ._..,..+~+.c . • , ` n pi • Y•.
~ • ~ ~ 1 Ol ~
, - ~
79-
. ~ ~ ' .
. ~
~ 1► _ ~
ZE
. J►,. ~ i ~ ! ~ t
, g W
w
.
~ J ~ •
I ' • . jjs+..+-~ ~
• ~
.
. '
N Ao►,h-~ V CAE AY~ . GXpsvm
t~'1"C~t~ ~ ~ ~ . I , , ~
~ IA
' j . UC.6V A V
_ • ~y,~s,, • • _ ,i . ~
~ , ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ •i~ .
X' _ + ~~1
• ' • " : i ' . - v..~1'=~ ~ 4n
. ~~j ~ Y ~r • ~ ~ I , i ► • ' ~
, ~ . . ~ • / 1~ ct ,
` f ~ ~ ~ ' .
~ ~ r' ~ . O • l
1 • ~ • . ~ ~
, ,.oe-~~..--~
r
I _ _~•~C • ! t-i~
~ • ~ ;c
' ` ► f
,
~ Q ~ , ~
1„: 1aoo ~ .
i. ~ , . . .
. ,..1 _ . . .
,A i►vu
r ~ • . _ : ~ . . . . . . . . _ . - ,
. , , . : . ,
~ n
~ „ . _itil,►_~~~~1~~^ ~
` . .1
I • ~ .
,
, ► , . 1 .
..r1 •
,
STAFF REPORT
DATE: JANUARY 10, 1980
TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-177-79
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: B & K Partnership
STATUS OF APPLICANT: Purchaser
PROPERTY OWNER: Kivett and Breckenridge
R EQU ESTED ZON I NG : Restricted I ndustriai
EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural
PROPOSED USE: Warehouse and industrial buildings
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located on the west side of
Tschirley Road, approximately 440 feet north of Dalton Avenue.
11. S1TE PLAN INFORMATION
SITE SIZE: Approximately 14.6 acres
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is flat and contains several
structures
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The area is in a transition from Agri-
cultural and Residential to Industrial.
LAND USE: Site Single family, outbuildings
North Undeveloped
East Mini-storage, single family, undeveloped
West Undeveloped
South Single family
ZON I NG: North Agricultural, established, 1958
East Restricted Industrial, established, 1972
West Agricultural, established, 1958
South Restricted Industrial, established, 1976
1 •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATICY 'VUMBER: ZE-177-79
II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: IndListrial
Nl1MBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 3(to be removed)
NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 13
Total Square Feet Approximately 210,000 sq. ft.
Percent of Coverage 33 0
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 story .
PARKING REQUIRED: 210 ,
PROVIDED: 500
III. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED
a) COUNTY FI RE MARSHAL
1. The site is located in Fire Districfi #1.
2. No comments received.
b) COUNTY ENGINEER
1. Applicant shall dedicate 30 feet on Tschirley Road for right-of-
way. Applicant shall upgrade Tschirley Road and Euclid Avenue
to conform to typical County Road Standard #4.
2. The design, location and arrangement oF parking stalls shall be
in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any
portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
automobiles sha{I be maintained in hard surface paving.
3. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be
approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the
issuance of building permits for the project.
c) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Purveyor is Consolidated I rrigation District and will supply the
site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses.
d) C4UNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. This project lies in CWSA #3 and within the service area of Con-
solidated Irrigation District. It will require:
a) Possible redesign requires approval by RE-DSHS or by DOE.
b) Each building permit should be cleared by DOE to assure
proper care and handling of industrial waste and compliance
wiCh air pollution standards and SCate Department of Labor
and I ndustry ( L& T) standards.
2
ZONE RECLASSIFICAT{OP'- NUMBER: ZE-177-79
IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMF_NTS RECEIVED (continued)
e) SEPA
1. That all plans for stormwater runoff be approved by the Spokane
County Engineer, iri cooperaCion with the Spokane Office of the
DOE.
(NOTE: DOE is concerned with and responsible for all disposal
schemes involving industrial sites where potentially contaminating
materials may exist. )
2. That the p{ans of each building be reviewed by the Spokane
Office of the DOE for compliance with non-sanitary waste
disposal measures before issuance of a building permit.
3. Prior to construction, each structure shall be subject to SEPA
review by the Bui{ding Codes Department unless exempted
pursuant to WAC 197-10-170 (1).
4. That the- provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to
43.21C.080 RCW be accomplished by the applicant within thirty
(30) days of formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner
Committee as instructed by the P{anning Department staff.
f) ZONING
1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Adminis-
trator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project
prior to release of building permits.
2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord-
ance within the concept presented fio the Hearing Examiner
Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning
Administrator will be permitted, including, but not fimited to the
following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and
general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be
maintained.
3. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and
-signing plan for the described property prior to the release of
any building permits.
4. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant.
Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed
by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee.
3
~ ~ • ~ ~
~ ~ ~r. ' V • I
~ • ' ' ' ' " 5# Jc>~e ~ -
~ ~ ~ , _ N L^► ~ T vA
t 5
t4 RT H r~ yv 4' -
ti 111ti ~ ~ ~ , r''' •t~ 't ~
a
o~
: ~:t~~ , ~ • - ' ~ R`C ' ~ ,
: •v• V- . - '`~~G ~
~ . . i ~ ~ , t ) r'^ ~ - ~ 1 { -
~
t
79
" til~ , .n • . "
. , ' ..arr+
v•
`
r+ • ~ C ~ 4' '
~ ~ • r~ ` ` ` ~ ~ ` t
q .
i
r
~ o~ .
- • -
~ ~ ° • ~ , .
/ . ~ ,
`j~~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ r' i.~ ~
• • 1.~.--~~~~. . . ~ .
O,kA
A V
~`.~T"'~y:.'~+►""'•~~l ~„3'"r"+ 1
rp IAL
' ~ ' • - ¢
. • /
• • + ~ ~ • • ~Y^ ' • ~ , {~.i
, • ` ~ • ~G
(3 •i
• ~ ` . CD
.t im • , . • J ~p
I 4 - ~ l ` z
_S~~ J
~ .
~
- • ~ ~ ` , • ~
1 ~ .
2
~ O 0
a . .
' ~ ~ ~A s L ' ~ • • ~r ~~~.ti ~~,~~3
t ; ,~fi.•ijli . . -
1 , . . • ~ti ~
• ~
' . ~
1 • • 1 • . '
l
t ~
' _ .
, , M a ~11t~f • ~ '
1
I .
CARLIS~.E r1' ~ - t OL
~ ~ . - •
r--- v
~:y`
~
Q W
9y D1° '5N N r"io r - ~ ~ • . ~ S C ,C o
WA TlQNrAL R)~j r 9 S 4 1 ~ - s...~ . _r^.2"..i.!..ti..t -----...t?"~
, - ~ ~ ~rL.•r~-f"
• _ , . „ '
• - - ~ ~ ~ -
~ . ~
I 1 • ~ , ~ ~ v !
t'' ►~6Rr ~`''~j,,.
~ M~' NtGO , .
..4 ~ , 9G . ~ M A \
C ~ t ~ ~A [1 o ~ 4 ~ .r.y.
cr ~ ( z ~ii~LY L
i
C c► 7 c
WAt
t = L x
0 g HI►R
51 µTo
.NELL' i~ ' ' ,~M T • ~ ~
M 004 f- < O E 5 r'^ E~ ~
~T A L
DES µ E.T
t - ~.~.6 ► 7 L G T.
c: w • ,.,+Ad- B~ p K
. 0 W a a
IA' ,
w
[jO
q ~ .
► 1~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ m
,EL qLK,
~ . - ,•}h.~- ~ ~ A'~ ~
. . 16
..w,~+- tincs::~j~nio~ ~ ~ •
A L' K 1 , • - o~ ~ .a v'i! t--
Z t S
~~i o, ~ + ~ xQ►t~d
+ w
~ p, _
~ A `L EY '
` O .
D' ~ £
tA RIv£
~,✓1 a. ~ r~i p ~ N l:.~ c ~ OE t" +
u,~'"' ; ~
•
=f'v . , ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ t ~ P a
J 9~ 'i
199j cr►CE
, ;L•~EL• ~ PGSY ; "'J
.1 _ ~ _ - ~ n ~ 1G~
Z 3 12* ~ . 1 C' ~"f . ~ • ..-....-1 . • J 1 • 1
j Ax. ,q 1 H p . A / t RDAD 4 -r,..a . , , . • ' p
~ 'F ou~~N
~
w
1 j~ x o- Q~ C1h' p'Vf"Z~v r .
Q~ 0
u. • V E
. ~ S►xt -
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Date Decem6e r 2 1
Inter-office Communication
To Zoninm Administrator
from Countv Eagineer
Sub jett ZE 17 -79
s
#1 ~ on Tachirley
Applicant shall upgrade Tachirley Rd. & Euclid Ave. to conform
to Typical County Rvadway Standard #4
#19
#20
Form 327-C R.
~'-zQ.IAW
Real Estate Brokerage Division • Valley Branch
December 07, 1979 •
Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, Washington 99201
RE: `LE-177-79 - Agricultural to Restricted Industrial - B& KPartnership
Gentlemen,
EnclosEd is a zone change submitted on behalf of Glenn W. Kivett and
Charles M. Breckenridge for a 14.6 acre parcel in the Flora Industra.al
Area, east of the Spokane Industrial Park. The project is similar to
other submi.ttals for Restricted Industrial zoning in the area.
A conceptual development plan has been submitted to indicatc the most
intensive option for development of the property for the purpose of
outlining the scope of such a development in an environmental check-
list. It is conceivable that another option could include at some _
future time, a plat to establish roads serving industrial parcels.
It is perhaps more likely that the site would be split into 2 or 3
industrial ownerships with each owner conforming to the provisions
of the Restricted Industrial zone and Coun'uy development restrictions.
It is important that suffs.cient inventory of zoned industrial land he
available in the Spokane Valley to allow for the user who has less than
a year to become established in a suitable facility. The submitted
plan offers the flexibility of grouping i.ndustrial sites, eliminating
certain building sites, or moving building sites caithout necessarily
causing a significant change.
If you have any additional questions, please contact me at 922-1300.
s ek, ~
,
ohn D. Konen, Consultant
kr
[)Ei~~ Iyr~
sPoKaNE cauNTY
PLANhIN6 DEPARTMFNT
East 12706 Nora Avenue • Spokane, Washington 99216 9 922-1200
-
FGRNI A
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
SPOKA NE CO UNTY
Date : vecember 5, 1979 A pp1 icatio n N0 : Z E-17 7-7 9
N3me of Applicant: B& K Partnersbip~J__
Street Address of Applicant: c/o John D. Konen, E. 12706 Nora Avenue
City: Spokane State: WA 99220 Telephone T\To. 922-1300
Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural Date Existing Zone Classification Established:
Existing Use of Property: Vacant ,
Proposed Zone Classification: Restricted Industrial
Proposed Use of Property: Warehouse and Industrial Buildings
Legal Description of Property: All of Tract 84 of Plat No. 3 0f VVest Farms
Irrigated Tracts, logether with that portion of Tract 71 of said subdivision lving
EasC of the East line of Tract 85 of said subdivision, extended northerlv.
Section: s Townshipr 25 N. Range: 45, EV1rM
Source of Legal: Purchaser's Assignment of Contract and Deed
As sessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 06553-0109, 06553-0123, 0124
Tract 71 Tract 84
Property Size: 14.~6)Acres .
Tatal amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: None
Street Addres s of the Prope rty: N. 3501 Tschirlcy Road
Who Holds Title to the Property: Glenn W. Kivett & Charles M. ]3reckenridge
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest
.
in it ? .
Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record,
their address, UJithin 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property.
-1-
Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) - ~ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MTJST BE ANSWERED: ~
-
1. VVnat are the changed conditions, of the site ana the area, which yau feel make _
thi s propo sal warranted ? The area is indicated on the comprehensive plan
of Spokane County as appropriate for industrial and maraufacturing uses. Alumerous
~rop~t~FS withrna ~ mile -radius of the om-iership have bcen approved for estricted Industrial •
zoning. lne area ls recogni2ea by r'lrms seekinb industrial land as an industrial
district. Sevcral major national firms have pi*cedservice facilities is the area.
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties ?
7.'hE iRpstricted Industrial classification will be compatible with similar properties in the area. During the last 10 years, the Spokane County Planning Cornmission.has'
been rE-zoning propQrties in the vicinit;y to the Restricteci Industrial category r,
with no objections. 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the proper-ty in question be
° secured under the existing zone classification ?(If no, v,rhy NO , The site is no longer conducive to agra.cultural or residential ourposes hP,caju2P. of
the change in charactEr of the area. New residential uses would not be cornpatible
with existing industrial developments. Land in the vicinity is out of agricultural-
,
produci:ion . '
~
I, the undersigned, swear under the. penal.ty of pErjury that the above responses arA made -
truthfuJ.ly and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the rcquirements o-I the
Spokane County Planning I?epattment and the laws of the State of Washington,
r)
L
C~ 4/0'
(Signed) ~
.
(Date) ~ l
2
-
. File #
i .
,
~s ~
• , =~~a' ! ~ . - E Sec. ~ T'sh'p R'ge ~.S
Classification
L V
;j F.~I. Proponent
SPOKav. LOUr+', GCURT kCUSE
. 5 P O K A N E C O U N T Y
STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLlST
1. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC
197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or
his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse-
quently been reviewed by the .
The following data briefly describes the proposal:
A. Actions(s) Requested:
Zone Change ; Preliminary Plat Approval ;
Final Plat Approval ; Change of Condition ;
Other .
B. Description of Proposal :
C. Location of Proposal :
11. Review of Checkl ist:
A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions:
(1) Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy
(2) Air (9) Natural (16) Uti(ities
R esou rces
(3) Water (14) Risk of Upset (17) Human
Health . .
(4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics
(5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation
(6) Noise (13) Trans/Circ (20) Arch/Hist
(7) Light/Glare (14) Public (21) Other
Services
B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the faliowing
questions :
Revised 6/1 /79
C. Discussion of impacts identified above:
III. Conclusions and Recommendations:
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff:
A. X- Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse
impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of non-
significance.
B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse
impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom-
mends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance.
C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do
exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. I V. Staff inember(s) reviewing checklist:
.
Revised 6/1/79
►
_File
- _
SeC.-Tvip.-Rge.~.
ENYIRONhtFNTAI CNECiCLIST
• .l.13
Y
Introduction: The State Environmentai Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C. RCW, requires all state and locai governmental
agencies to consfder environmental values bcth °or their own actfons and when licensing private propasals. The Act also
requires that an Environmental Impact Statenent be prepared for all ma,jor actions significantly (and "adverseiy", as per
wAC 197-10) affectina the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of *.his checklist is to hlep the agencies in-
vo-lved determine whether or not a propasaT is such a major action.
Please ansKer the following questions as completety as you can wfth the informativn presentiy available to you. Plense answer
questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in ynur apinion, even only slight impacts will resuit. The reviewers of the checklist will
be aaare of and concern themselves s+ith the dearee of impact, askinq you `or mere information, if necessary. Where explanatiens
of your answers are required, or xhere you believe an explanation wouid be helpful to government decisian-makers, include your
expianation in the space provided. ar use additional oaqes, ir' necessarv. You should include references :o any reports or
studies of which yau are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Cartrolete answers to these quesLions ncw will
heip all agencies involved with your proposal ;a undertake the required environmental review :+ithout unnecessary Ceiay.
The follawing questions apply to your total proposal, not jusL to the license for which you are currently avpiying or the aro-
posal for wnich approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your prooosal wnen iL is
cortmieted, even though corrroleLian may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow ail of the agencies wnicn wi11
be involved to campie*_e their environer.ental revier+ nor+, without duQiicatinq paoerwork in the future.
No application shall be processed untfl the checlclist has been camaleted artd returned to the appropriate County depar t-Tent.
State law requires exotanations gor everv "ves" and "mavbe" answer on the r_hecklist. The person campleting Lhe jarm my be
required t0 provide explanations ror "no" answer5, ana in Some cases, more detailea inrarnwtian to aid in a threshold
determination.
NOTE: ThiS is a standard form being used by all state and local aqencies in the State of 'Aasnington `or varfous types of
Rroposals. Many of Lhe questions may not apply to your praposal. if a auestion doe5 not aooiy, jast answer ii "no"
and continue on La the next questtan.
ENYIRONMENTAL C1iECKLIST FORM
1. 3ACKGROUND
1. vaae of Prooonent: B& K PartnershiD Phone Number 922-1300
z, Address of Proponent: c/0 J. K.A/onen 12706 E. Nora Ave., Spokane. titijashington 99216
3. Oate Checklist 5uomitted: ~
4. ~3gency Requiring Checkiist: ut~ .v I~ annin~ (.c~mmis~Q~
C. yame of Proposal, if ~3pplicabie: - ~(y ar1CU U 3 O CStT'1CL2C1 naUSLY'18i
5. Yacure and 3rieP Oescription of cne ?rnposai (includina but not limited to its si,~e , gener 1 ae n 1 nt5. a
other factors that +rfil qive an accurate understanaing of its scope and nature) : lne su~mi~~ec~ ~ypicadevelopment
plan indicates 13 industrial buildings on the 14.6 acre site comprising 210,000
sq. ft. of floor area. The project, with access via Tschirley Rd, could be
5V.4P& by a private or public road system depending on future plats.
l. `oc3tion of Proposai (describe the ohysical set*_tng of the °rooosai, as well as the axtent of the 13nd ar?a arfac.ed by
sny snvirvrtmental impacts. includin.g any other inrp rmation q ed to ive an accu~,atg, unqetstanding r Che env ron-
~rrentai settfng of the propasai lne pr0,]2CL 1S Sluatec~ W2St OT ~1-SCrilY'lE,y gd ^ eas~ of
the Spokane Industrial Park. The site is centered on the floor of the Spokane
Valley, relatively flat, and well drained. Two houses occupy the property, and
will be removed before develooment, .
3. cszimated Date for Comoletion of the Prooosal: 1qL1 ,
9. List of all Pernits, Lic2nses or Government AQorovais Required for the ?roaasal (federal. state and local - inc'.uaina
rezones): • ~-1~poka P ('~~t~,yl~gi neers Of fi rP, Rui 1 di ng PPrm; t~-SDOkane
County Building Codes Dept. Sewer permits - Spokane Countv Health District
(IF SPACE FOR zXPl.ANATIQY IS tPlAOEQUATE. °IFASE ATTACti AOOITIQNAL PACu"5. )
10a. Oo you, er the awner in the event you aa not awn the subJect land. have any plans for ,`uture addi*.ions, axpanslon, or
furtner actfvity reiatad *.o er c4nnec:ed with this preposal? if yes, expiain:
NO - Ownership i$L3confined to zone change reauest.
lOb. Do you awn or have options on land nearby or 3djacent to this proposai's location? tf yes, expiain: mn
11. Do you know of any plans by others inciucinc the a+ner whicfi may affect the property covered Sy your proposai or land
adjac2nt or nearby? if yes, exaiain: Yes- Inland Asphalt Company contemplates sand and
gravel oDeration OCl UX'QnP.r't1P.$ to 1;bP. P.agf.
12. Attach any other applicatfan form chat has been comoleted reaardine the praoosal; if rtone nas been camnieted. Cut is
expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of sucn apotication forzn:
NONE ,
11. EYV[RONMENTAL IMPACTS
(lc-xQ3anations of all "yes" and "rraybe" answers are requirsd) Yes .4avbe tlo
i. Earth. Will the proposai resulL in: •
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in cnanges in geolagic structures? . . . . . . . . .
(b) ^uisruoLians, displacecrents. cc=action or avercoverinq of the sail? . . . . . . . _ X _
(c) Change fn topography or grauna suriace reiief features? . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~
(C) The destruct;on. coverir,g or T:odification of any unique ceolooic X
or physicai reatures? . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . ' - -
(e) Any increase in wina or wat2r erosion of soils. 2ither on or cff the sitz? _ ~i.
I
([F SPA.._ FOR :XFlANA?ION IS iiVAdEQUATc. P! cASc" :TTACN ADO1 ,IOINAI. P~6E5. ) .
' (t) Changes in aeposition or erosion of beach sands, or char.aes in siltaLion,
depositian or erosion whlch may nsodify Lhe channel of a rzver ar stream
or the 4ed of the ocean or any bay, in1eC or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x.
Exolanation: Compaction Of SOlls wi 1 1 t^Pstil t hPr-aii--,Q nf rnari hi,; 1 rii;g, pa____ _8
lot develoDment, and foundati ons nd fl ~ r~ nf hiii l rli nGC ~~d Innd-
scaping Wlll S1Rt11,C31'1tlV Y'P.duce Wi nd Anc3 wafpr erngi nn 2, ASr. 'Aill the proposai result fn: Yes Mavbe No
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of aabient air quality? . • . . • • • • • • • X
(b) The creation of objectionable odars? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , x
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or t2mperature, or any change in X
climate. either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _
Explanati4n: _E''OlF?f'1;
other industrial developments. Restricted Industrial zone classificat~on .
prohibits activities causinR air emisaions, or_Qhjer-t],,.nnahl P nrJnrv
3. Water. ',1ii1 tfie proposal result in: Yes Mavbe No
(a) Change in currents, or the course or d!rectfon of Nater movenents, X
in etther marine or fresh waten? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) Changzs in aDsorption rates, drainage patters, ar the rate and x
amount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(C) Alterations to w1e caurse or f'ow of flood waters? • • • • • • • • • • • • • _ X
(d) Change in the nmount of surface water in any water bady? . . . . . . . . . . . h
(e) Oischarge into surfnce water, or in any alter2Lion of surface water
4uality, inciudtng but r,ot limited to temQerature, dfssaived
oxygrn or turb'dity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) Alteratian of the direction or rate of flaw of ground waten' . • • • • • • • . , X- (g) Change in the quantlty of gound waters, 2igner through dtrect
adaitions or withdrawals. or through interteptlort of an
adui°er by cuts ar accavations't . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(h) Oeterioration 9r. 9rounG wat2r quality, either thrnuqh direct
injectian, or through the seepage of leachate. phospates. •
Qetergents. water5orne virus or bac*.eria, or other substances ~
i nto the gound waters 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
(i) Reduction ;n the amunt of water otne n,iis2 avaiTaele far ~
public a+ater suapiies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
Exetanaclon: PaV1rla of surfar'P. arPaS 11Ay rt-ril1r,~ s deezo-~ ' ~ a storm
~e~ ,
water plan adequate to accommodate surface run off on site is required bv the
Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to development.
a. Fiora. Will the proposal resuit in: Yes Maybe No
ia; Chanqt in che dtver;ity of 5oeties, or nurt+ber of any soecies of flora (including Lress. shruss. grass, crops. mfcroflora and
aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
, (b) Reduction of the numoers of any unique, rare or endangered
speties of flara? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ X
(c) Introductien of new sp2cies of flora inta an area, or X
in a barrier to Che narmal replenishment of existing spec:es? _ _
(d) Re<iuction in acreage of any agrfcultural crepl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
Ezplartat,on: The area is currentlv weed grown. The sitP Ls si,j~tej in the
urbanizing portion of the Spokane Valley and most of the native flora has
been replaced by introduced vegetation. ,
5. Fauna. Will the proposal resulL in: Yes Mayb2 No
(z) Changes in Ctse dlversity of ;pectes, or nunotr of any saecies
of faursa (birds, land anicrais including reptiles, fish aha
shellflsh, bertthtc organisms, insects or micrvtauna)? . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) RedutLion of the nunbers of any unique. rare. or endangered X
soecies of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) Incroduction of new speties of faura into an area, ar result X
fn a barrier La the migration cr nrovecr.ent of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) Detsrioration aa existing fish or wiidlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
:xaianaLion: The site is situated in the urbanizinp, portion of the Spokane Valley.
Wildlife habitats in the vicinity were previouslv destro.yed by agricultural and
housing activities. ,
5. AOise. Yes kavoe Vo
(a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . • • • • • • • • • • • • X
;:xolanation: Restricted Industrial zone establishes noise limits. Noise levels
on the site will be compatible with adjoining activities.
i, liqht 3nd u"13re. Yes Mavbe Yo
(a) 'aiil the proQOSat produce new tiaht or glare? . . . • • • . • • • • • • • • _ X
~xolaRation: Restricted Industrial zone requires confinement of light and glare.
Lighting will be required for securitv purposes.
- r ' - ~E--~7~►_ 7~
([F SPACE =0R Ei(PI.ANATION i5 INAOEQUATE. PLEASE ATTNCH ADOITIONAL PAGES.)
8. land Use. Yes Nayne yo
(a) Will the proposal result in the alteratfon of the present or ~
p 1 anned 1 and use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
Exotanntian: Area is designated on comprehensive plan as appropriate for inlius-
trial activities. Adjoining ownerships to-the east and west are zoned K'~stricted
Industrial
. _
9. Platural Resources. 41111 Lhe proposai resuit in: Yes Maybe No
(a) IncrBase fn the rate af use of any natural resources2 . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X_ _
(b) Oepletton of any nonrenewabie natural rescurce? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
EXOtanacfon: Depending on the type of firms deciding to locate on the property,
certain firms may have processes which 4&9 natural resources to qroduce goods
and products
10. Risk of Uoset. Oaes the proposal involve a resk of an exptcsian or the Yes Mavbe No
reiease of hazardous substances (inciuding, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, ch enicals, or radfation) in the event of an accident or X
upset condition5l . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • '
• zone prohibits storage of hazarTous materia.ls
ExQlanat;an: :.Restricted Industrial•
11. °opuiatlon. Yes Maybe No
Will the praposal a1Ler the location, dlstrfbutfoa, density, or growth
, rate ot the human popuiatian of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X
Explanation: If developed at full potential , the pro,iect could -aenjerate approx-
imately 200 jobs in the manufacturing or warehousing sector plus approximately
50 jobs in the office sector.
12. - Housina.
Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for X
additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
Explanatton: If developed at full potential, ,jobs ~,enerated b.y the project
would place additional pressure on existing housing and create a demand for
approximately 100 neca housing units in the Spokane Valley
13. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal resuit in: Yes `tavbe No
(a) Generation of addittonal vehicular movesnent? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yi- _
(b) Effec:s on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? _
(c) Imoact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulatfon or movement
of people and/or 9aods? - . • • . • • • • ' • • • • • X
(e) Aiterations to waterborne. rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. (f) Increase irt r.raffic hazards to motor vehicies.
bicyclists or pedestrians7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~
Exoianation: The pro ject could provied parking for 550 vehicles (210 spaces re-
quired) perhaps generating 600 vehicular and 100 truck trips per working day
at maximum intensity. Roadways to Flora Rd. and Euclid Ave. will have to be
L1p ra~ied to ,gccommodatg the irreased traffic.
14. Pt~~ic ervzces. ,]iil the proposa have an e ett upon, or result Yo~s Kavhe ~Vo
in a neea for new or altered governmentai services in any of
of the ioilowing areas:
(a) Fire Proteciion? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
(b) Police pratectfon? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _.aL -
(c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ X
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(e) Maintenance of public facitit9es, includinq roads2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
(f) Other qovernmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
LXQianatjon: Fire hydrants will be installed on the 10 inch main on Tschirley Rd.
and buildings built to meet fire code. Additional security including alarm
systems will be optional to tenants. An RID or other mechanism will provide
improvement ~o area roads.
IF SQACE FOR EXPlt1NATI0N IS IHAQEQUATE, PLEASF ATiACH 400ITYONAL PA6ES.)
15. Enercv. Will the prooosal result in: '!es :lavoe 40
(a) Use or substantial amounts of fuel or enerqy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ X _
(b) Demand uoan existing sources of enerqy, or require X
the deveiopment of new sources of energy? . . . . . . . . . .
=xolanation: If the pro,ject is used for warehousing, minimal energy will be needed
to maintain the buildings. The proponent does not, at this time, know if
certain future owners or tenants may require energy in excess of warehouse
. rec~uirements.
16. Utf itSes. Will the proposat resuit in a need For new systems. Yes Mavoe ~Vo
or alteratfons :c the followina utilitfes:
( a ) Power or natura 1 gas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
(b) Camnunication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(C) '4atEr? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d ) Sewer or septi c tanks? . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • X -
(e) Starm xater arainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
3
( L; :PkC£ FdR EXPLAYA'ION IS ?MOEQUATE. ?lEASE ,aTTACA AQOITONAI PAGES. )
(f) Solic wasLe and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X `
ExRlanation: Power and natural aSS W111 need tn hP Pxt'PnciPd .n 1-.hP nr1nj_,r-Lr_.aS
well as telephone svstems. A storm water drLjaaP-P n7an tti7; ~ i h-- dQj;;i Q"fJ
for the site. Contractual arranaPmenr.s wi 11 haup fn rp matirz f"N '-Qj4d =-Xa.Vte
disposal. Seraer systems will be installed. per aplicable cout~6_y rdW~LreMrnts
17. ;;unan kealth. Will the propossl result in the creation of any heaith hazar s X
or potentiai health hazard (excluding mental health)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
Exolanation: Restricted Industrial zone prohibits unsafe storage, water, air, and noise
pollution. Industrial safety will be regulated by appropriate state agencies.
18. Aesthetics. 'd111 the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or
vier+ oFen to the public, or,will the propasal result in the creation of an X
aesthetfcally offensive site epen Lo public vie++? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explanatton: Site is situated in the center,of an emerging industrM district.
19. Recreation. W111 the proposal result in an impact upvn the quality or
quantity of existinq recreational opportunitiesd . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
Expiartation: Pro,ject is removed from parks or other recreation facilities. !
20. Archeoloq'cal/Hisiorical. '.lili the proposal resuit in an aiteration of a Yes Mavbe No
;igniticant archeoiogical or hfsLOrlcal site, structure, eb3ett or buiidirtc,? ~
ExoianaLZOn: Archeological or bistori cal eatures are knoc,m _ . .
[II. SiCuiA'URE •
i. the undersigned. swear under the uer.aity of per±ury Lhat the above resaonsez are made truthf+,lly and *.o the
oest of my kncwledge. I aiso understaad that. shouia trere be any will'ul misrenresenLatian er -xitlfui lack of
`uli disclosure on my part.5pokane County may -oithdraw any declaraLian of nansianificance :hat it ,right issue in
reliance upon thi, checklist. ~
Oate: ~ •~Y / 7 ~ Proponent:
(Please Print ar Type)
~
~ ' Address: w. y c.,
?roponent: , ~.,~l~'/~
P!ione : 0
?
~
?erson ccmoleting form: ~'hone: Date: ~,17 ~
v
ci
Qepartment or Offic2 of County Reviewinq Checlclist:
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist:
~
~
.9~ 4~
~VB
a
0
0
e
a ~
r
60
.
v
~
tvJ
~
~ 66•o'
~
;7d
,
~
'o a
G p Y
r p
S
NA
i
~ ~Z ~ •o .
o
S~3•Dd ~
1 ~
1 Q fdQ•'¢'/'~,.
~
d d S
~ v
~ o
~o~
~
ZONING WGRKSHEET Form C
application ~ ~9'
This Cocurr.znL -.vi11 arovide tne Planning Department Staff w-ith writ[en verification that:
1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning
Departments who agree th-at the legal descciption is acceptable.
2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements oi the County HQalth
District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Dapartment, County Fire
Marshal and Wa ter Purveyor.
3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be providec' for:
residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses.
An applicant is required to 12resent a copy of the proposed DEVELOPM :NT PLAV with
this worksheet to each of the listed aqencies for their review and determination as
to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require-
J
ments. (IVote: $Qnlicant shall contact indicatecl aQencies in sectuence listed belcw_)
PART I- to be rompleted ySnokane Co ntyEn,qinee
A preliminacy consulCation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Enqineer's
Office and the proposed development has been reviewed.
1) State DOT Review raquired : Ye sNo.
2) Access to be limited to: ,
3) Access permit is required,
4) a, edication foc rightrof-way is required.
)23 feet on r Se 1-•~~ Road, Street, Avenue,)
b, Radius ( toot) is required,
(On and Road, S treet, Avenue,)
c . - -Slope easement is required ,
5) Drainage Plan is required._,-K on-site V off-site.
i
6) Paving Permi t f s required.( fee t on Road.)
7) Curb is required,(alony Road, S treet , Avenue,)
8) 'O'idewalk is reeuirzd. (alang Road, Street, :'lvenue.)
9) pplicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID.
101 j Legal 3escription fs acceptable as reviewed.
Parcel Na,
Commen t s :
= P ~ ~
3 Da te
.
ZONING WORKSHEET--continued-2
~
pART_II -to be camoleted '--,v JOOIC31'1P Coq= Utilities Department
preliminary consultation meetir.g has been ',zelc; t.vith the Spok3ne CounLy 1-1tilities Departr*:ent
and the proposed development plans have been reviewed.
1) The proposed development i is not cated in a public sewer ser~rice 3rea
operated and maint3ined by ne County.
2) A storm drainage ola &R s not required for the proposal.
Comments:
.
Z ?
.
S igned Da te
PP.RT III- to be completed ySpQkane County Water Pur-Jev,or
A , Water SuDplv
I) The proposed development is located with the district boundaries.
2) Satisfactcry agreAment/acrangQment has/has not bean m3de to serve this
prooosal.
3) We are/are nct alble to supply this development with adequatP porable
w3 ter .
4) We are/3re not able to supply this development with adequate water for
fire flovi.
S) Wa Cer Pucveyor is public, priva te community,
private, other: ,
6) W3ter system fs/is not under St3te Utilities jurisdiction.
7) Indicate size of main for hook up: - inches.
~
8) Distance to main: feet. : I
.
,..~.~.~~u ~ r
B . to be com d "
y~pplicant
1) Individual water supply will be develooed with/without fire protec~ior:
capabilities ,
( _ . O mI71 eI"1 k 3:
J ICJll2u Da te
C. If proposal is out---ide the boundaries of any water district, the Stata D'~-^artment o:
Social 3nc ~ Jalth Services must re,aiew the proposal crior to aDDIiCatfon.
1) I/UVp have revietivec! the G!'ODGShc. ?t 'apoears to meet State rpquiremenhs `or
public wa te r.
~
7~
~ ZGi1ING WQRKSHEET continued-3
. y
! ;77 ^
PART t1/ -to be com dby Sookane GQiLn,tv Fire `,`::irs al
1) Proposal is Iacat?d in Fire District ,
Z) access and circulation for emer7ency vehicles is required.
~
3) Fire flow s not dequate for proposed developmen and i is not
required.
4) Main(s) need to be installed,
S) Hydrant(s) need to be installed.
6) A1.4 Water Supoly Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons)
I
7) -~44 Nearest fire hydrant is feet.
8) Driving dfstance to nearest fire station is ,
Commsnts:
ikA
1 4 rAw
~
~
ziswzenowAwo
Sig Date
PA2T V- tQbe cnmpleted y SDOkane Counr,y Heal h District
A preliminacy consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed
development plans have been reviewed.
I) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible
and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank;
lagoon; treatment plats; other:
Other methods considered were: ,
, .
2) Air qualityo/fs not a concern with this proposal,
3) Ground w3ter quality gyis not a concern with this proposal,
4) voise&is not a concern with this pcoposal.
S) Liqht&is not a concern with this proposal.
5) Propcsa1 is subject to review and approval of final plans.
~ . w
Comments:
~
. , . /
,
. .
~
' .
r
Signed Date
12, 7 9
- ~
~
,