ZE-13-77 !
e
~ l~ 0 ~ G . ~ ~ I
~ ~ ~ COLCW-ty I C~ W Ot~ f~ N~. V~Pt N Nl NC-;
Kr-v-Ttr,ia oN M►~RC-ti
~
v
°
GL F-14T~ E Kf- 14
~
17,T- WAS 1J~~~.5Sf~'~V ~o~ fly- Lr-~rlVE
TNE ht.E-t iivC--~ B1croRZ THIS ITILM L~~~ 'THE
3t---'ouCztfT c.~~i 17 Ai'Tr--NDt,b 1"}}E
1`'1E.IEI iNC=~ 1 S`1 GKbl~-R 'tC vC i C-E. 1''1`r~ 06JEC7! ON CIN.b
Tt1 RT df llY Rus B A-Tt D. ~~PfYRVNb GRAZ-F-HJ6Z
~ 7
`t'tA~ R`~.Q uF_S'~t~D ZoN~ C~t-f~NC~t ~R 4 M A$RICULTURAL
`T~
MW-YtPt~ VAM%LY SQ13L,(Rj34j4,,
pe-COFOINGi ti) 'Ttfir- A&5NbA jIoTtC5 )l Wf-
iz E.L' r- i Uc- .yp fRcM 'Ttt;S COMK155101~ ~
APPLtCf}~!'"'
bON t~ Lb -J ot+tv soN - PR.oPOsr--s TD us~
~
~t'i~o~FITY V-oF PpFT Mr--V'r B~i L Di NG. ~ : nL.,,unri,~
H Nb NQT I N YOUcit oir T N I S 1'R o t'O 5'L i•
~T= V.11- % L.~ L 'b r P 'E-:: ~ u TC ~E:. F- 'j~t1~. LH r,~L
uL ~ U,~ L ,
Ht~l u W~ 1~'t~~t=~. P~ 1~T ~i E. 2 C)•I ~.~D 7n J i t16 0--
~Ytoti"11L~ Rr-Sip"'nf1L CR, I~ W1TH LOTS DV- ONE-A(.-,
. i. . ; ~ .
`
~
Tk+ks L.oY 5tzle- 1s f}asol.u't1-7-L4 'NOT`
~ I 1P) Q~ wr. N~ 1 C - x tt T S u P POR T i,o? 5 0'F' rt oi.Ess
►
"UF - "RE Stzr-.
A i tv .L f~ M 5o R l~ Y~~ ~-w fl~ ~.crt t~ B t~ 'to
1 ~ ~ . ; : ~ ` 5= i 1 ; y•~ . : ~ / ~ 1 ti ~ , ~ , ~ ,
~
r
~
1
/ L
1. I
~
C N r~~~ ~
ZE--13--77
. A&Lf (AL.?t.l 2PrL~ -ro Mu LT lJDLG FA n.i iLtl 5L4 bt4a bq rJ
CANT ~QI'vP~r~i.1~ dONNSTor%1 .
S , -rE - 2 . Co ~1 c 2r' PArLc-El
L.o c,r~ r 10 ,v 1 O C7 f= ~ N o R.T4 pF-- TN E
N W. Cofw E(-L- oF SuL-wu q" i I 2Tt+
S O LtTtt W F S T (D-9 (::F NT219 t_ U A LLE ~ 14 1 G t* S G!{Oo I
~10a)v5A(, L4 N i T f-\(?AjiT M Et.-) i cowoi_c XI.
- 2 - CprVLCXcS_
` f)AR.Ki rv
- l_oaN nScA&..d G
- ON Cta2.GkLrvTtc>•J
LP~N r,) USC ~►~A~~S~S
A►R.CF L_ ~..►J v~C-sT~ o~ v Acgw 1
N02-t ~l Y CCS~ l7EN"t 1~ l~ u.L~s L-~2C~F.r ►-1ClLF4Cs ~
T~AcTs
- ~EwNESS~Y SK5o,u,sio~ - 2-5 Le-m Po►L Amc
g Lo-'S ON 3- 5Lk Ac2cs
_ -
~ G ZES i 7P T) 1 t_._
kf L E S J T Fr- olL. ~no~ E rJ PI.HT
►kST1S Sq~)oivtsjot.3 - t47&-1477 2.scap4Ac4~
27 Lo-r5 cti a ~ . ~o nc263
~Pis-T- v A~qN ;
S orc Vo rL lvpRooEo czc"rjoc"T'&L--Pc4-'
tROT C H FeR E) n- iCRG. I rZ► Ari.T'S " - 1• 2. AGRE Loqz
1 23 Lo-r oN) ! S$ Iac.2 ~ 5
W CST
~
~
• f
.
~f2.A~ C~ ~ u~~i u~,~r o ~ - ! ~ 73 ~i •'c"~ +l'? ~r+~ I~J~~~
~a-r~ ~ "7 , c,ra cs ,
~ 1.. FN ~ Loq%cvo .
L~►'~N N ~ ~ ~ ~ h-`► ~
ZONir~G A-NAL4Si-S
~ccs-r tr►~cv I-m•so (As ~s Fort- A rte^ i s
T--Ann~~ ~~SJOCsJ[tAL- r-Ara C>
- ~n'~+~r~.~a ~ ' I~'~►r ~-r r AC-
- -T HC Ab+v VF- MG^-r7fON F-►'J J~"L.A-T-- ~ ~~1~' ~'r,~ f-~
~~1 ~ ~v~.b~► V + S~+C~ r,,) _ ~ - 7 La r4vtr"-
fa
ST`5 ~ u~~rvr~~8 ~ i~3 E..OT 'T`O )L*4.fx.lg
G r.> CkfLlr., ~c~S ~ • ~ AC.IZ F 6)AACL-1- S
Ao)a)L"! t.A N T'S 1'lr t~ S ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • Ll L4 +~J i"1rS ~rL_
v
fAC.l"t- C .
.
~
~
f
f ~
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
ZO NE C HANGE
3 ZE-13-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FA11/IILY SUBURBAN JOHNSTON
Planning Staz} Recommendation Deny
The stafi finds that the proQosed multiple family suburban development is
inconsistent with surnoundinq land uses, and inconsistent with the residen-
tial densities of the area
1 The existfng land uses in the surrounding area are single family resi-
dential, and a forty-eight (48) unit apartment complex at thfs site
would not be compatible with existing and planned residential uses
2 The staff notes that a number of preliminary subdivfsions in the area
(Sullivan W ay, Sullivan Acres Addition and Si's Subdivision) generated
a great deal of public opposition because of the proposed higher gross
singie family densities The Spokane County Planninq Commissfon and
the Board of County Commissfoners of Spokane County have approved
suburban residential lot subdivisions in the area at a gross densfty
of one acre to 2 7 units per ac:e, and the applicant's proposal is for
a gross density of 18 4 units per acre
A STAFF ENVIRONMEIVTAL REVIEVIi
That a declaration of Non-Siqnificance be issued, in accordance with Section
11 15 340 of the Spokane County Envfronmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to
approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commissioners, or
that any approving action of the board be conditioned upon issuance of FiLnal
Declar -ition of Non-Significance in accordance with SCEO 11 15 340
- 3 -
. __NU TES
MARCH 11, 1977
ZONE CHANGE
ZE-13- 77 - AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLS FAMILY SUBURBAN TOHNSTOAT
Plannfnq Commission Recommendation Deny (Voet was unanimous )
The Planning Commission finds that the prop osed multiple family suburban
development is inconsfstent with surrounding land uses, and inconsistent
with the residential densitites of the area
1 The existing land uses in the surroundhnq area are sfnqle family resi-
dentiai, and a forty-eight (48) unit apartment complex at thfs site would
not be compatible with existinq and planned residential uses
2 The staff noted that a number of prelfminary subdiviLsions in the area
(Sullivan Way, Sullivan Acres Addition and Si's Subdivision) generated
a qreat deal of publxc opposftion because of the proQosed higher gross
single family densities The Spokane County Planning Commissfon
and the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have approved
st %urban residential lot subdivisions in the area at a qross density of
o acre to 2 7 units per acre, and the applicant's proposal is for a
gross density of 18 4 units per acre
A. STAFF ENViRO1VMENTAL REVIEVIT
That a Declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance wfth Section
11 15 340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordfnance (SCEO) prior to
approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commissioners, or
that any approvinq action of the board be conditioned upon issuance of Final
Declaratian of Non-Significance in accordance with SCEO 11 15 340
B GENERAL DATA
1 Location Section 23, Township 24 N, Range 44,
E W 1N! The E 1/2 of Tract 165 , Vera,
except N 180 ft and except S 100 ft
2 Applfcant Donald R johnston
E 12 716 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA 99216
3 Site Size Approximately 2 6 acres
4 Existinq Zoning Agricultural, estab March 27, 1942
5 Propo sed Zoning Multiple Family Suburban
6 Proposed use of property Apartment building
7 Arplicatfon of zonilig provision Chapter 4 21, Section 4 21 030
8 Ervlronmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
significant aaverse environmental impact
- 32 -
k
I
~
/
.s
4' SPOKANE CQUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS BUIdDIN(3 N 811 JEFFER8011f $78EET
r
PHORtE 458-2274
SPOKANE WASHINGTOtY 88201
~
5QOKANE COUN GOUR NOUSE
MEMORANDUM
T O gIbI( CO }}EP~--t1}
,%TP4; emvre *eUmf-
F RO M S pokane County Planning Department
N 811 jefferson, Spokane, WA 99201
Attentf on SIAI',_„~ri"f
DATE
R E F E R E N C E Attached Pmpo sed Declaration of Non$ignificance and Envfronrrtental
Checklzst for
Information on file concerning this proposed action Yndicates your agency to be
one of jurisdiction, WAC 197-10-040 (4)
Accordingly, a.f you wish to exercise your right to review and comment as pro-
vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advis d th t the prx~ s 1 was listed
rx
in the SEPA Public Information Center on 3ffk 77
!
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET
{~'a t
PHONE 456-2274
'a a SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201
SPOKANE COUNT GOl RT MOUSE
LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION
OF SPOKANE COUNTY
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Plantung Department,
a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an
ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAI3 AGENCY for the followfng described pro)ect
-ZoN r. ~C~w6 ~ ZF~ - 13• 7 7 - ~►~u~~~~.. -ro
M m"if Sal S F'o~ A A& 4N 1 T_ 2_
fiwm ,o c, Am a-r mgAff oN 2 Co AcRz,;
The following is explanation for this determfnation
4~11~ - Lly- to - Z Z0
Determinatfon for Spokane County By
d
Name L -
Title N Atmoi
Date 3 ' 16 ' 7 -7
SF 1 C REF. #~S" I 3' 7 7
23-ZS-4'qr
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
~
i
DECLIaR4TION O1=
(proposed/final)
. Ll:U4i•H_.$~/'7✓laM \P/VAtWE
(significance/nonsignificance)
1. Description of Proposal: ~ ~ ftoft 2 ~ V I (,.D/ M(p pf~."~~ ~
~ ~ ~LE-Y ~ ~ ACZASK5 OF: L&fJ0
2. Proponent:
3. Contact Person: Phone:
3. County Action(s) Requested: 1jj~-
AAWL1 I W xfzu e&d►ej
y. Location of Proposal: '(41E N. \A/, /96Q 6A-=&
or- me
S. Lead Aqency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been determined to NOT have a significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is N required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) ; This
ciecision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist
and otht-r informatic,n on file with the lead agency.
Rcsponsible official:
Proposed D2claration: Final Declaration:
(name ) (name) 16VULY C. XDPErT
si nature) (sianature)
(ti.tle) bl e~,~QE,,_ (title) CUAI aN4AN
(dept. ) P!A#J►J,rjf0 tEPAa-r ~~`f (dept. ) BD, ~
nF L~ ~~c?~ !►'1
w ~
da e - 4~.d (date)
Dspartmnnt Reference No.: ze , 13,17
(See Reverse Side)
~
For DVclarations of Significance Only;
Date of Expected D-aft EIS Availability
(determined by Rosponsible Offtcia.l)
Date Entered in "EIS in Preparation Register"
(determined by SIAPA Public Information Center)
To be completed by responsible official;
a. Brief description and listinq of those environmental impacts leading ro such
declaration:
b. Brief explanation of wfiat measures, if any could be taken by the applicant to pre-
vent or mitigate the envlronmental impacit of the proposal to such an extent that
the responsible offictal could consider zi revlsed proposal with a possible re-
sulting declaration of nonsignificance:
g. For ErQpased Declaratiors of Nonsignificance Only:
Date Enkered "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance
Register" (determined by SEPA Public Information Center)
Date comments to be received (15 day review period)
(determined by SEPA Public Information Center)
9. SEPA Public Information Center:
(For departments of General Government oniy)
( ) Approved as to form
( ) Disapproved as to form
Reasons; Signature of SEPA PIC Officer:
Date:
- . + _ , I ; •I ;i} 7
,
DEPT. FILE REF.,..~~- 13- 77
T 7'LI~~ /r~•S 'f d~~~
SPOKANE C.~Ut.rt~OUKi HOUSE STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10,
an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent.
This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed
by the
PIAN N I N
The following data briefly describes the proposal:
A. Action Requested: N F, ~F~(,~ F'RQM ~caL71taa t. Tb
M F
B. Description of Proposal: ucAPT iAA-S amwoSso ~ l4N IT
AR'T M EI~1T CoM~ ~ 2 sklalr CLhLo
CLec
1~~5
C. Location of Proposal: WO FEEZ-YJortTH _90 T F~~3. W.GRNEZ
Or- 04 ~ IZT"
- F Loom o F StpKsW~L V ALuE Y
II. Review of Checklis t:
A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions:
~ (L-~_ t ( 3~~ Fl*"
j
~ LIS.N T
GLAap-
LAwn l15 rs ~ ~17~) ~C 1.~ b
N LCC SMW
1
U3)-i 0%.r (iq)
rib at-Ci Al-woATIc
Upc.s rtc~
(Over)
B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following
questions:
T
I
C. Discussion of impacts identified above: IqrN'r/ON F 0 SLa 6. H T
A R.SV. Znpwo WIL(. ~ M~TI~i~'!'CQ ~,OMQ17/ONS
O F A~RAV AS, 3 NOT~ GTAF C ~_~QMN'~NA L~wt CA"~
c w v f? ~ • .
III. Conclusions and Recommendations:
Based on II A, B and C above, the staff -JEA,,cuy pgS THCAL AR~
mQ '!~tC,mFKA"T AOv ~t4149NMCN T~I L. ZVOJOW.TS ANQ
OCCO M Mf fiAt QS 'TSS tt AMC ~e. O~ 6 C*j c ~•s ar Vw1 0-F t-!Q*J,
1
' ZE-_,
~
Aw rx ~W- I r
A'N'
~+'r---
. . . . . st
ENVIRONMEIV'TAL CHECKLIST
Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RC'J1T,
requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values
both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, The Act also requires
that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly
(and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your
opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be
aware of and concern themselves with the deQree of impact, asking you for more informa-
tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you
believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional paqes, if necessary. You should
inclUde references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are
relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will
help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental
review without unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now,
without duplicating paperwork in the future .
No application snall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned
to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes"
and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required
to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information
to aid in a threshold determination.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for various types of proposals. M,any of the questions may not
apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and
continue on to the next question.
1
~
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Me, (1-
2, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: /41P7~~
9~~ ~~30
3. Date Checklist Submitted: 1-17-
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane Countv
S, Name of Proposal, if Applicable:
6. NatLire and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size,
general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under-
standing of its scope and nature):
te TU A4
7, Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the
extent of the land area affecEed by any environmental impacts, including any other
information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting
of the proposal) :
4.CJ JLlLG~dr4~ /~lJ.~/S ID~
8, Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal:
y
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required fcr the Proposal
(federal, state and local - including rezone
~
~41-7,ti i.v~
2
L
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS II`'11DF,QU='%TE, PLI;t~SE ATTACII ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
10. you h 1%7e any plars foi- future additions, nxpansion , or further activily relateci
to or connect%,,irJ: 31 ? If yes, explain:
-1, ~
f
11 . DD you know of ciny plans by others %%,!zich may affect the property covered by your
proposal ? If yes, explain:
/f/'O
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal;
if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date,
(?oscribe the nature of such application fnrm:
T~~ ~5~1' S';''f t T
TI. ET'VIRONML-'NTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" anci "maybe" answers are required)
Yes MaylaE~ No
1. Eart}i. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic ~
s tructures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering ~ i
of the soil? . . . . , , . , , , . , , , , , , ,
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ~ _
(d) The destruction, covering or modiffcation of any unique
geologic or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . ~
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either ~
on or off the site ? . , , , . . , , . . . . . 1
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of ~
the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? .
Explanation: 464 C ~ (EXC404-77o.t/ Or- 517E Ftp 4 /(/LK/
S7 -W a e' ru,etS Fne /DA4 1.v.9~~ 7' 01 1N/ArrA I
,
3
~
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yas. Ma3ths Ng
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?. _
(b) The creation of objectionable odors ? . . . , , , . --5 S I `
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? x
.
Explanation: rOSS /BG£ 5-/I?,44-,--' /AI o.vs
2 u 7-a rgs~ ~e-v' '0gu Tav'yto.,6i~E T/1~9F'G~- ,5~►-,~,9-~T MiAV,1r7741.
f6zle&-Ig- - C~N Qr- QbmmaoaQla
ut Smf Aer 1-6wico im
3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No
(a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters X
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or /,5
the rate and amount of surface water runoff ? . , . . , . _
x
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters X
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water ~y
body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited y
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground • Y
wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? . . . . . . . . _
(h) Deterioration fn qround water quality, either through
direct iniection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, x
or other substances into the ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available y
for public water supplies ? . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explanation: (4) <5cj9vA70•✓ jO 4CCa~'!'IaD•91Z .l/~U-/ ,6Lc1c S ~li~GL
.
AI'L /D241A✓ I-e'2hz7Ze•v5 SC / L-?-h/TL L/ ) 5;70VE
,
- N4T P r~0 ~ARK f 1►Ka S W1 L L- PFFOCT-
WATEn-
4
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACN ADDjTIONAL PAGES,)
Yes Mavbe No
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers o~
any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, %
crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? , , , , , , , ,
(b) Reduction of the nu.mbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? , , . . . , , , , , , ,
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of ~
existing species ? . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , . _
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop ~
Explanation: A 1~ C - /t/~~,cJ ,~~},(,~dSUq~/~vts ~~.~.Qosc~vDi•~(j
7~ok.t~.a,~' OF i3La~r> S L~/ ~l~C /~£5 uLT /.tJ Gi44~',v~j ~
r.~-/ P04- 7_
. S 1_~'1`3V},`'
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers :any species of fauna (birds, land animals includl:
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . . , . , . . .
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or ~
endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . , , , , .
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or
result in a ba:-rier to-the migration or movement of fauna? .
(d) Deterioration of existina fish or wildlife habitat? X/
Yes M be No
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise le els?
A/Cl2~fi ~ ~ 70 ~/l~£f9~ `
Explanation: U212i S, L! / / ~
h~T
,
T j4+? ,4 C,,
i
5
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe No I
7. Lic ht and Glare, Will the proposal produce new light or glare ? ~C x
Explanation:
~914AE2 Qn!~!s ITJ QQ690VTIAL- u$E s«~N As T,rr*-F-o~VrM1
i
U N iT 6PNL7MEWr Cq%*,EX f W-f LL, ff4top Q c-F L196W 4t
,
~1 uu ~A V
Yes Mavbe No
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area? , , . , , , , , . , ,
Explanation:
h_ EEMC7 QN G&sfiwG
L.P~~ II~S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TL~ V~1c~►JT • • .
dbsstiLe UtcPiTX-imer (samai - t H Qr..N5 tr+► r&1-4,J PzwTO /1 Aqkwj
Yes Mavbe No
9, Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources x
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X-
Explana tion : ep=
Yes Maybe No
10. Risk of Uoset _ Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) ~
in the event of an accident or upset conditions _
Explanation:
6
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe No
11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area ? . . , . , . , , , . , , , , , ,
Explanation: '-Z~C"'e.F4Ss/,
~~=~~'~f7 ~~ul,c? ~'70~ a-~ j7~ s~ ~ ~ i' ~%N/iz^ r ~ ,
12. Housinq. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housing? , . , , , , , , ,
Explana tion: 1 ReS/pw'T IqL rN/s
A LCA f::~~ QE F., NJ.~~a~~ 3 NoT& : Aw"u4wTS
0
. _ . _ , f . . .
13. Transportation/Circulation, Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for
new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ -
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems ? . . ~ ~
. . .
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ~e
movement of people and/or goods ? , , , , , , . 9.
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? '
(f) Inerease in trafffc hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . , . . , . ,
Explanation: 46 & 770ti-9L 1`~aGL~i~ (!/lC[:- CoVeCSE
i~~rc ~ov~~~ /•v ~e~9 ~1~ ~~P . , :~r
X2o6~•c,,4 //z&j /~L4 s G~~el- 1177VI-
~i.vr~.4L ..,I-.~/Jy4e -T-, .
Yes Maybe No
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas
(a) Fire protection? . . . . . , , , , , , . . . , . X _
(h) P<,lir.e p~ ct-~cti~ n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
^ ~ -
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
S I
(c) Schools ? . . , , , . . , , . . , . , , , Yes Maybe No
. . . X, /4~
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities ? . , , , , , , _ ~ 09)?
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads ? , , ,
(f) Other 9overnmental services ?
. . . . . . . . . . .
Explanation: -THIS ~~SAL WtCC. ~t ~ 'j-E.}~r
TNE Ge9&9NAftErurmt`. ~ER~~~~ C~ECKErJ ~
Yes Ma~rbe No
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X_
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy?
Explanation: •
Yes Maybe No
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utflities:
(a) Power or natural gas? . . . , . . . . , , J S
(b) Communication systems ? . , . , . . , , :S S. . ~9-
~
(c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -
(d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . ,
(e) Storm wa ter drainage ?
(f) Solid waste and disposal? , , . . , , , , , . ,
Explanation: it/ 'r c '6 S
STOnrvt w ~c ~~viq~ NpVU&It, Geus-
~N
8
I, t11e undersignecl, sta[e that to the best of my knowledge the above information is
tn.ie and complete. It is understood that the lead ageilcy may withdraw any declaration nf
nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist shoulr_i tlher(, 1_~e -:MV
willfial misrepresemlUition or vvillful lack of full ciisclosurc on my part,
Proponent: za4,,~
(Please P►.-int or Type)
Proponen t:
r
~
Ac1d r e s S : f a ~l ~ 4~777 , • . ~ . .
Phone:
I'erson completing form: N~~~
Phone:
L>apt, or Oifice oi Couizty Reviewing
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist:
10
.
(IF SPACL FOR ID(PLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe No
17. Human FIeallll, tNill the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazar<i or porFntial health hazard (excluding ~
mental hoalrh) ? . , , , • , , , , , , , , ,
. . . . .
Exolana tion :
Yes Maybe No
18. Azsthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal rosult in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site X
open to public view? . . . , , , , , , . , , , , . , , _
i:xplanation:
Yes Maybe No
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities
ExUlanation:
Yes Maybe No
20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical site,
structure, object or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /k
Explana tion:
9
lw mw
OFFICE Of TNE
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Date Tanuarv 6 119 77
To Title Company
From -q.p.okane-G.ounty
Subject - -
Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of all property located within
400 feet and the five nearest property owners of the below described property
E 1/2 of Tract 165, except the N 180 ft and except the S 100 ft in Vera Add ,
Section 23, Township 25 N, Range 44, Spokane County, Washington
Also, please include all mortgage and loan numbers with addresses when possible in
order that proper notYfication may be made If there are no more than five owners within
the 400 foot boundary, please furniLsh a list of the owners and taxpayers of record for
the five closest ownerships Incomplete or illegible title company lists will not be
accepted by this department Thank you
Donald R johnston, E 12716 Sprague 924-9223
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH OISTRICT
Inter-Offi ce Communicati on
Da te March 4, 1977
TO Spokane County Planning Commission ,
r
ROM Eugene C Prather, R S
F
SUBJECT Zone Change ZE-13-77 ,
I Reference your memo to me, same subject, February 24, 1977
II This project is located in an area with soils classified by the Soil Con-
servation Service as suitable for installation of individual on-site sewage
disposal systems The area is, however, located over the Spokane Aquifer
A study is currentlq under way to determine the degree to which subsurface
disposal of sewage treatment effluent may pollute the Aquifer There is
very little probability that this project in itself will have more than a
slight impact on the Aquifer However, taken in con3unction with the over-
all urbanization of the area some other sewage disposal method irlll most
likely be required in the future
III From an environmental health viewpaint the project appears feasible An
on-site sewage management plan pursuant to WAC 248-96-070 may be required
dependant upon final design dwelling unit density or total sewage flow per
day
dc
ECE
I If E
MAR ? 1977
SPOKANE COUNrY
p1ANN1{yG pEPARTMEWT
SCHD-ADM-118
L
5PO~ANt VALLFN FIRt DtPAMAtNT
~
~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 ~ TEIEPHONE (509) 928-1700 i .
f :
~
,
r
March 3, 1977 '
~
Mr Fred L Dayharsh, Director =
Spokane County P]anning Comission Spokane, Washington 99201 ~
Dear Mr Dayharsh ;
d .
The following zone changes and prel,.im~inlary subdivisions have been
~ reviewed for adequate fire protec ion
~ -
~ PE-1086-77
ZE- 46-77 - Mains and hydrants need~to be installed in th3s area. :
~ f ! 1611/ I1 ~ .
" !I_- n/-!/ ~ Ma ins aiicl hyriiariZh neec! Lo be fiis LoT lecl in this drea
,
~ PE-10$8- 77 _
ZE- 48-77 - Ma~f ~ ~ -
Mains a nd hydrants n`eed to b&,Y ns ta141 ed in th is area ~
PE-1089-77 ZE- 49-77 - Mains /adZdchydra`nt/s need to be instaiied in this area
ZE- 139-76 - Ma 1 ns /and4 hydrants need to be i ns tal l ed'~in th i s area.
.
✓ZE- 13-77 - Ma~~n/s(and hydrants need to be insta led,-i~~ n t ~~s area ~ .
, ZE- I4-77 Mains and hydrants need to be installed'ir1 this~ area .
I(" 16-77 -1'hnre'(tirr ~►xir IirirJ m7irl I Ii ic E~~ h~lt hydrants will bc: Yieecled
~
' ZE- 32-77 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area
; ZE- 39A-75 - Mains and Iydrants need to) be installed in this area.~
~
~ S i n cerelyA
Al Co0 k ,
Lt of Inspectors ~
Fire Prevention Bureau :
~
1 ~ PREvENT FIRES sAvE LIVE5 O
-
At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or against, the granting of
this appl3.cation
~
AGENDA, MARCH 11, 1977 TELEPHONE NO. 456-2294
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING COMMISSION
Time Friday, March 11, 1977, 9 30 A.M.
Place Conference Room A, Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
3 ZE-13-77, AaricultLral Eo Multi,nle Familv Suburban
a Location Section 23,Township 25 N.,Range 44,E.W.M.
The East 1/2 of Tract 165, Vera, except the
North 180 feet and except the South 100 feet.
b. Applfcant Donald R. johnston
Ea s t 12 716 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99216
c. S f te S iz e Approxf ma tely 2.6 Acres
d. Existfng Zoning Agricultural, established March 27, 1942
e. Proposed Zoning Multiple Family Suburban
f. Proposed Use of Property Apartment building.
g. Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4.21, Section 4 21 030
h. Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearfng iuay be
whether or not this proposal will have a
signfffcant adverse environmental irnpact.
xa'1___
- - - -
StMO~ m
oC„~ . - r- t ,
a,cs~ c
UBTH V ,
Q ~
4
LZ 5 TM ~E .
2 v
~M 6~►
.
p OqM`f cl ' gntroi Val I ey L'4;
7►tw ,
' ~GHO o ` rPis f 1 e
~ Q'
1 +
w 0. ~ IGHT H AvE ~I • ~ Z tl
~ ~ J r
, 4- _ f-~- 24
~ ,
ti V V.
r NoRTH
~ ~r = ~tlGt~ , i
,or*,
a
~ ~ T~ 1 ~ ~ - y N
II TH AVE
• ~ ~
r , O e
T LF T H V ^ z ~
0 0 ~ W oao'
13 T Z ~ C~ a ;u a Q~
1
.4 f AL
j It TEENTH > , saTH AVE
F*Q T LLUTto ~ w
< ~ V1 ~
3 ~
_ IX? N AVE SiXi'EENTH T AVE
~
-14-
. ~
1
ZE-13-77
A hearing to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Multiple Family
Suburban on property described as the East 1/2 of Tract 165, Vera Addition, except the
North 180 feet and except the South 100 feet, in Section 23, Township 25 N , Range 44,
E.W M. , Spokane County, Washington
('West sfde of Sullivan Road, 100 feet north of 12th Avenue )
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SSo
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
/V1bX6A/&LkS',k/ , Being first duly sworn, deposee and says
That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now zs, a citizen of The United
States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one
years
That an 19 77 he personally posted three (3) true
and correct copies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the
following places in Spokane County, to-wit
l
1e -r-e 4~'~ di ~ ~~tm~ ~a ~ ~ .
~
~
2. d-a
~
r ~
3 tP O-A
Subscribed and sworn to me
, 19
NOTARY P'UHLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE CQUNTY, WASHINGI'ON
Reslding at Spokane, Washington
~ .
.
APPLICATION FOR SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COPJINIISSION
Z O N I N G H E A RI N G Court House, Spokane, tirashington
Lc 13
Date J'anuary 6 f 1976 Application No ZE-13 _ 7 7
11ame of Ppplicant Donald R johnston
Street Address E 12 716 Sprague City Spokane State WA
Telephone No tl ~lA ga 3
EAisting Zoning Classification Actricultural
Date Existing Zone Classification Established Ma nh I-q4?
Proposed Zone Classification Mu1t~_ F~„mUll,.3ih,t~~rhan
Proposed Use of Property 49e4l~~IE47' et b6 .
Legal Description of Property 5~' //Z ^F T2•qC-7- 14S"' C" 7xc~~7 7-r
/1o 180 ~i 4,u4 e5xG,aP7- TiY-s- s /ao -A--. ~W !/E;ew A.1)4)
Site Size 36 v X
Section 2-3 Township -Z ~ Ranqe
Street Addre s s of Property 0, &je~.sS - V,4e,4Aj-r Z-f '"41
Who Holds Title to the Property ~~-ee,4
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest
in it ~ A e~ EN T
Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record,
thefr address, within 4`00 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS 1/IUST BE ANSWERED
1 'VVhat are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional
zoninq ? 42E✓9
.
,
2 vvhat facts justify the proposed zone reclassification based on the advancement
of the public health, safety, and general welfare %
ee C. vg-sE~~ /'E:Avs 1T o~'
~
/N G/~' &0q 344 MA-Z Ti.Ar-;~ i c t~ -~o.vE
~
3 `vvhat effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the value and
character of adjacent property i
lef- z.v9W 7'"0 ~~CG T/~'a9~7/Lc~ !,~/LL /~VC2 ~i9SE 1/04L 4A.
/f.t~t1 C'o¢R,4C TF.e 4X- o9.6-j_gG£'N7" PWo ~E4-7-Ir
4 Can a reasonable return from or reasonable use of the property in question be
secured under the existing Zone classification
4~
A plot plan or sketch rnust be attached containinq the foZlowing information
(a) Scale of the drawing.
(b) North point
(c) AIl dimensions of property, existing buildings, and proposed buildings
(d) Location of all existing and proposed buildings, or additions, vrith
dlmensions to the nearest property line.
(e) Off-street parking area
(f) Defined points of access and egress.
(g) Date of the drawfng
THE NECESSARY FEE 1VIUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION.
The recommendation of the Planning Commission in this matter wfll be presented to the
Board of County Commissioners ior final action. Any person desiring to contest the
recommendation of the Planning Commission must request, in writing, a hearing bPfore
the Board of County Commissfoners no later than ten (10) days following the date of the
public hearing held by the Planninq Commission
n,aladl Ze/?
( gned)
ZONE CHANGE PRE-APPLICATIOIV
Date ? Applicatzon No ~ F,- 13- 77
Name of Applicant - DoLJO%c.> ~ o(jp sTO ti!
street Address (a?~Co F_ Sfie^,~LtL Clty 5P40Ko4wJ*. State SUIQ .
Teiephone Numbe r 44 q 2 Z 3
Exista.ng Zone Classffication A&jcuLTu2A,~,,
Date Existing Zone Classification Ettablished 3- 2-7 -4 ?
Proposed Zone Classification fVl.uux4 Fwmet~ 5ck6r
Proposed Use of Property -AVA2.T'm6&TS No of Acre s1~pPt
Legal Description of Property ~z. b~ TI?14C7- /(P-S-
9KC EPt -Lt& K( JO' 4ND EKcF p7 -r& S.
IAv VP,,e A 144 0 .
Section 2 3 Township 25 Range
Stree t Addre s s of Prope rty VAe-4,LT LAAjo AT- 12
J k L C l dralJ
Who Holds Title to the Property
If you do not hald title to the property affected by xhi.s applicata.on, what is your
interest in it?
~ ~
DATL Tanuarv 6 r 19 7 6
ZE-13-77
Spokane County Planniny Cotnmissioti
County Court House
Spokane, vvashington 99201
Gentle me n
vv e, the undersiyned propzrty owners, reque st tne Spokane County Planning
Commission (NXXXKDCUBOCWCKWOOO r(to consider chanyinq the ~oning map) from
AGRIGULTURAL tio MULTI FAMILY SUBURBAN
on the followulg descrzbed property
E 1/2 of Tract 165, except the N 180 ft and except the S 100 ft in Vera
Addition, Section 23, Township 25 N, Range 44, E W M, Spokane
County, Washington
~AML E ADD Rt, SS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lo rs - 3,s 2) l0
~ 1 _ ~a rc yFo2~
ir c
o4~ ~
('.24Il 6.4TCow ~ IQ t.A ` , o~, !N ~~2 0~ TR ACT 16 S
CAWr6 64rLow ~ !'-z t-A Lu ~i a~c T2~cr /!oS c~C. ,L ~S ~
4
~1
.
1~-p2oa -3- ei4SEy /a'~ Lu /qJF-" DF S a2 >Sr o~ l340C /G6-
Cg-)5
F'eEA 2~ v~ous s ~oa su s lL 7-,e IV Z E-x, s a
~ o ~ S
41 4-0
~ 7~~ roe
Scs~ro~. I~~sr 3S~o G?/o 77 ~ oI= u~ f~'iZ 771
~8 G► F G~.~ O ~ s~w /y~ Ex l.u. 2 0~
~
S«qs .¢~s ~ 15-304 /z. y--A
j-, L ;I ,8l..C 3 C~e•~<l~ SGr~
ld)10
c~.R~r~ ~r~s•~f~.s Cor G Bclc 3 ~ 11
,~,~3yntdn.,~.1 ? o~2R ~Erh z~oT S i5 c~r 3
012 ,
CID 1.S ~ `tf t ~ 7uce I2 S 1021 sV C~~~ee.Zs LaT- -3 ~
~T 14
~rT f~ ~~3'rT'A Lo7- ~ /54e 3_ US-
16
e
1
1
~
~
`
•x~ -
. ~ t
~
~ ~ i , `•,f ~ ~ . ~ ` .
•.;v4. P j~• 'R n~I 4 i
t •~a ~ ~ ~
'
~+~r:tr t~ ' ~'ry,,,~ ~ ~ ~ ' •
• ~ . ~ ~ { ~ _ .
t ► .
i
! -
y~ ~9 w~' ~ M
~ ? ~ 'r•~~ ~ • {
~
•
ri ~ f
~ s+
l~ ` ` ~ ~ • ~
•
~
~ -
,
~
x ~ R •
• ~ ~
'
~
i
~
w ~
• ~ ~
1
,
f
r
1F
1'Y . M
Il~~I~~~~~ ' • 'r '
,~-++~'~e.~~ .~'+F~ :,i. `
( ~ s _ ~i►~, i ~ .
1 s ~ J.
, _ w`' i.~"''~ ~'~t r ~'~►~i '
a
,r''. ; ' ~
~M. . ~F ! . • ~ ; ~ ~ i , , / 1
,s' ~ ! , •
~ ~ • P ~ t . '
.->'I • 1 ~ ~
\
4~ i At
♦
• ~
f
Z
~ r
~~i~ ~ ~'s, ~ •
A `s ~ •
s ~
~ . , .
. ~
. _ 4
. ' + • ~J ~ ' ~ . ~ ~
1 A
, ;1 ~ ~ • A ~ . ~
•
. i ~ . • .
3-
# ~ 1 ~
> ~ .
, 3 • i. ~ 1 :
, •
~ ~ ,
♦ j` ' .
~lr~.+ ~ ~ ' 4 , ~ • ' f
y ~ t
, "-l • F, ~ • ~
' ~
' i
~R
,
. ' _ ♦ . .
I '
r ~ ,r, t 1G ' ; 1y.
, .
1 A w ~ s
~ ~ ✓
. i .
~`a~ ' ~
' ; ; , : •
.
.
~ ,.'4~ti~ ~ s~
~ ,
~ ~ : • . 1.
' ~ ~ • ~
' ~
.
- ~ „`~.r~
t ~;v
1 • t . ,
♦ ,~~.`t• ''~ti ~
~ 4 f ` ~1 • ~N~. ' i, +.4c
f~ t = ~ ti
r r • ~
4
~ ~ ~ 1 , i t ~
~ ~ ..1 • 1• ~
~'•'•~'i, - ~ '1
. ' •
. ~ t~~ r~ . ` +
~ b
Y
V
~ ~ •
1 7
_ `~►'q~ ~
~ . •
J4
-
r ~ 0 r-e•
~
L I8T OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAY ING TAXES 0N PROPERTY
Spokane County Code Number: ZE-13-77 Owners and Persons within 440 feeto
Application is for a 7.one C,harLaP _ Aaricultural to Multi FanLilv Suburban.
Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following list of names and
addressea consisting of this and the following pages has been prepared from the
latest availa e recor an is to the best of my kno ledge c rect. ~
Signed by _ For -2 -
Title Company)
Date: Jariuar 7 f 1976 SPOK PRE COUNTY P~NNING COM~ti1
OPERTY p ISSION
LA ST GRANTEE IN CHA IN q rE: ADDIT I ON
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRES~ ~LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) BY: ~
, .
~i ROTCHFORD ACRE TRACTS
T
0 L.N. Cashatt J$,~' 24543-0103,02,04
i /
T iW.M. Reeves & Assoc. ✓ ~'y~ Lot 3,2,1 1
p Same 24543-0202,03,0~
T Same Lot 2,1,3 2
O,Olga Marsik 23544-0203
~ S. 1/2 Tr. 142, EX. S. 25'
TlFred A. ReVious ~ S. 902 Sullivan Rd. of E, 321.9'
p Irene J. Toll 23544-0906
/ E.1/2 of Tr165 . 180' of S.
T Irene J. Toll " S. 1004 Sulivan Rd. 25' of E1/2 Tr 42
O,Paul G. Yancev 23544-0905
E. 1/2 Tr 165, EX N. 180'
T Paul G. YanceV E. 15405 12th .
0 H.R. Wriqht . 23544-0902
T Craiq L. Catlow S. 3828 Pittsburg E. 991, W. 1/2 {rr. . 165
0 CraicJ L. Catlow . 23544--0908
W.1/2 Tr 165 EX ~.99' EX W.
T Craig L. Catlow S. 3828 Pittsburg 148' of S. 275'
0 Olaf P. Coffev 23544-0907
1 W. 148' of S. 27 ' of I
TsHarold J. Casex E. 15305 12th , Blk 165
0
►
~
,I, , .
' (Coritinued on next page)
• ~
LI~;T OF GWNE2S AND PENSONS PAYING TAXES GN PF,OPEFITY
LAS`L uRI~N i EE IN CHA IN
TITLE (0) AND ADDITION
~r ADllRESS LOTS BLK
i-~'~r.SOPdS PAYING TAXES (T) I
CRAIG SUBDIVISION ~
1'
0 L.H. Smallfoot ✓ 23544-2501
~
~
T lst Bank Mortgage RV 57978RA ~ q 9aLot 1 3
0 Kit P. Lafita 23544,2502
T lst Bank Mortgage KF 20583-AW Lot 2 3
p Lyle M. Tucker 23544-2503
,TLyle M. Tucker ~S. 1021 St. Charles R Lot 3 3
~
A
0 Douglas J. Borth 23544-2504
r
~ Lomas & Nettleton 02-46-31640 Lot 4 3
C, RaXmond J. Orazem J.,L05 it 23544-2505
.TLomas & Nettleton 02-46--31633 Lot S 3
nWalter G. Lubbess ~ 23544-2506
1Bancshares Mortgage 1703705 Lot 6 3
OJ.L. Quakkelaar J ~ 7 2aL 23544-2507
.
TSherwood & Roberts 10-29941 Lot 7 3
0 VERA
Don G. Friske +S•544-1114
,
Blk 167 Ex N. 200' of w.
1Key Homes Inc. ~s- 911 Progress 1/2 EX W. 344' of S. 445'
OSilas J. Bates 23544-1001
iSilas J. Bates VE. 15306 12th Blk 166
`
(Continucd on next ra;e)
_ 1
i . •
OF C)Vt~~.-"k ; AND n}~SGId.", P,{YIPIG TAX:,',; ON I~iOPLF,`I'Y
i.AST Gk'RN i EE IN CHA IN
OI' TITLE (0) AND ADDITIO~d
PERSOriS PAYING TAXES (T) ADllRESS LOTS TLK
0 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 25, RANGE 44
T .
0 School District 356 ~ 24543-9042
T N. 671.77' of W. 992.77'
p of NW 1/4 of SW 1/4 EX
T w. 20'
0
T
0
1
0
l
n
T
0
~
0
T
0
T
0
r
J
(Con-uinuca on next paG,~)
~ ~
~ '
You ar+e hereby nnt~fi~ed, that vn ~
, at the hour of
af said da in Conference Room A, M~dllon Avenu~ En- Y
trance, Spokane +County Court House Annex, 5p~~ane,
Washington, The ~iPQK~►NE ~C~UNTY PLAI~NINC C~►MMIS-
SI~~I will conduct a public hearirn~ to ~~x~~~~~
~+~~~~iG 3~11~ ~`~~t~ AG~I~i~LTUpA~ rtG ~t~L?'I~L~ ~A~[~Y ~~~U~~J~H
~r~~~~~~~r ~~r ~~~t~~.~ 1a~H~~c~r~, ~~~'P l~?!~ BPRA~~~ ~v~~~~;
~~'~K~11~~, 4~~8HIN~T~1~ F'~3R ~~~~'C~~~13 1~~'AAY~I~NT ~tixL~?iN4~ ~~'~»14•7►~~
General descripti~n of area: ?~~~r r~~
~~~~~'T T~iL ~GL~T~: B~C~'iGN ~"~1~,~~~~H~~ ~S ~1., ~J13~~~ ~1,
~.1~'.~.; ~P~~JII~~ GC~ti~'TY~ i~'~~HIN~Z~~I
IV~~~t e t+~n ~f Sull~ra~d Naed, ~+~U i~~t na~th ~i y~th Av~nu~ .
F~R FURTHER DETAILS car~tact th~ Spokane Caunty
Planning C~mmissivn, Public Works Building, N. 811 Jeffer-
~ son Street, Spokane, Washingtvn.
.
6~' FR~G DA7~HA~~~3
dfrecfor af Planning
Spokane County Planainq Commissian FORi~I B4~C PLM1iG. CDMM. 3•69
~