The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-11-77 ~ ~ ~ Ple ~ ~ 40, ~ / i iIG -7r Da tP ' Tinie %1ffiile,You Were Out of -6,. Phot,. AREA CODE NUMBER EXTENSION TCLEPHONED LEASE CALL ~ CALIED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANT5 TO SEE YOU URGENT J RETURNEU YOUR CALLI MlessagF _ ~ 1, - ; f, . . , ~ .r Ope~ator , ? I Hut fEice Products , Hur ppYsette, Inc. " ~ Ab . I"U►'ti-~-C~~ ~~i .a ~i,~ , /1- ?7 ~ Z7~ ~D wu~ ~•R-~, , ~ 3'~ • ~ t,,, c~Qp w ~ ~ , ~.•SY _ iu 16K il-A G•~• ~ - ~ ~ ' PR OJ F C": I NFC?RMAT I OT2 ~ ~0 ~ . A, Building Infnrmat±on . J' 1. Nan^: :run F3urr Arzns 2. Address: N. 2705 and N. 2715 Pines, - - 3. I.egal Desr_ri ptl,On: [Ats 1, 2, 3, $1s~t 2, StGAer'ldge ti Parcel No. 095411'-, ~2301,+b2, 03 4. Archi't,!cC; Spcf'icane Furnlture A Desi§n Cox'p. :E. 102 Sp•»a,~ Spokar~e, Wasft'! 99202 747-5162 5. Owner: WoPf land 5. 717 Pines ' Spokane, Wash. 49205 929-2542 5. Mechaniea}.: Le311e Killinpssxorth W. 4111 JaniGe aPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPART#,+IENT Spokane, wash. 44208 325--2190 ' AppR L(yT pLqly T. Coritraetor: Walfland Construc:.ian ~ S. 717, Pines Spokane, Wash,,492fl6 _~il*t3~e~~~ S'<4 -5?4 8. Cant2!ct Person: Dan Tayior Le aei~ c~ E. 102 Sprague > ~ Spakane, Wash, 992(32 7~+7-516~ ~b~~-- (3 ~(~p [.tr'[.,*~3.- . P~pw C' os1 s t~' ~t C L i m?~ . ~t a F¢QLcc;J "1,3 CiiCl, Fxisting Lat use: Vacan`- ti 11. Pronosed :Jse: Aparttnents f2 ~ ID Unlt Buildir.c;_-: Y" I2. Occupancw Group: R-1 y~.. 'y 1 l.+oIlyL1+J4.tiV[1 ~ypei *_N I APpRpVED AS 1I0TED 14. Allawatale Heigr,t: 2 scor4s 4 15. AZlowable ?!rea; 5000 5F - 6000 SF x2 Floors= ?%.OOC " ONfLv. =nSiWW 16. E3Lzflc!inR iir:ight: 291_4" 17. Easement: Flc>or Area= 1688 SF ~ De" Occupant Load= 8.5 C3ccupanta 18. Gratjnd Floor: rloor Area = 3376 CF Occuparaw Gead= 16.9 OccupanLs ~ iP. Secand Floor: Floor Area= 3376 Ciceupant I.oad_ 15.9 Ckeupants - 20. ":oral clocsr Area: 8440 SF/Bui3.tir.g 21. Valuation: $295,400/8uild"1ng . B. Zoning Inforrnation I. Zoning: Residential Offfce 1 ZE 11-77C 1 N~7E: 2. [.ot Area: 320 t't x 136 t`t= 42,520 SF 3. ~.c~t Cnvera{~e bv Bui2dings; 20x - ~i~~face dra~~rage will nQ# be permi{tect e:. Lot Goverfng with pr,Wing: 17% to run off OntQ tne roa,d right vf vy,ay, it 5. Parking: Required= 30 Act,ual= 31 must be diVcsed af in an adequate on Handicap Fieqd.- z actuai= r+ . SIte d1'y► Well SySteITt. 6. Setbacks: i4Pquired Fron*= 25 ft Actuai F"rorrt= SPp!{AIN~ i~QUNTY Ef~GlN~ER1NG ~EPT. Req~'irea Flanking= ln rt. Actu~ Flank:r:_- aeq:~frea siae = io rt. ACtu~ siae= :~~P f. , Reavired Rearz 2 tt. Actual Rear= DRAWING iND'EX ~ PRY \VEy~ ~ A-1 SS.~.e Plan, Pr~e,~ecG information :"~-2 Foundatifln Fl an, Structural Notes A-3 F1oor P1 an * Finish Schecfule A-4 Building Seetions ~~~L.~~IQ~ A-5 Building SecLian:~, 1}etsfls 4 A-6 Elevatians, CarporL, ftiser Diagraims Fd.'XS. A. j M-1 Searage I7isposa] Plan . r • . > ~ «=~'°•-_j7~'r~.~-~ • , ~,~l, .•~i'' Ir~?"I~~. ~ . • ~ - - ~ - ~ ~ 'r' L • 3 i ZTs _ t~-~~' t` ? i ~ ~!!,:ft~.",~.~ _ ; • ~ ~~Q'►~l~ V ~,'~p WjC,~-~^~,~►~T~f,G~,~ . _ , `1.~ ~ _ , ` • 1r~ .cv*T ~i , ` ~r`~..'• ~ 1~g ` ,Xtvvq.11ir~`"•i 7a S . f ~ I ' ~ ~r. ~ . , . ; _ . , `7` ~i F? ~w~.' _ _ r " ~ ~ . . 1 ` *R~ A. Ti \ • ~ ~ w ' I 1 ' I i • . '~O--.J"f f0. ~ ~ , : L r, , r~' _ . _ ,--A . I , ~ 1 ~ ~ tfi ~ • ~s • . f a : t•~ ~ - - - ' ' ~ , . , • l~ M i_~ ~p . p . I9►l " ~ ~ o , r 2o c+~t P~tKS ~ Z 4 . ~ ~ ~4 + N , ~ 1 ~ 1 ~p _ _ - 7 . ~ IQ CAR PARKS y_ , ,~~y ~ . ~ • w z . 7-K~T % ~ , - ~ , . - , ~ ► ~C • ~o ~~I i I~~'.• R / p i+ ~L 4 ~ 4 1 17 4, ~G~o. I r~ i ~ . . ~7 • i ~ ~ _ . ~ x ~ ~ ~ • i ~ ~ ~ i ' ~ ~ + i •'1'~ I Q ' CIM i~ I i• 4''vr I ~ wv.r • ~ . - ~ . 1 _ ~ ~ 1 rt 4 _ _ r'm ~ r~►~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ DCTA€v~s lo~, ~ - - _ ~ 6 T • 1 I i00~b~ _ _ _ ~ f, - - - } Z CAov~N - ~ I a 4 1 ~ ~I ~ I R•1►~i U N1 - - • ID!~„66 ~I rGY ~ OIl F1UAl . ~#?T w'°°►) rLAcx'4% E4 bl~r I lo[i.A ~ 6t~OS~ ` iN~. - , tTf ? ~ , • ► , ~ , I ~ , • _ _ ~ _ ` _ l.- 7 t'w+ \ • i r` - . b2.16 - ` 1~4b~ _ _ . G ~'F' 1 , ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a . 1oi ~ I b►~ I1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~rttaeu. b~11~.GllvtI~ 13 - ~ & PAR`~MENT ~ ~ Ia UN , ~ f~llGLvw~ A. i~2,~e' -I IN, FL. 5LEv V. F r~ . ~ i I U M 1 - I~~ FLI. r~. ~t~ I, CLLC .(',o ~ V E F .6 1~~ _ i Ll 2 i IN.FL. ELEv. e ~ ~ . u -+o2.ia' o _ , ` ti N - - I NUHBLIIS - • FIaKH R►,DE ~ ~ ~ \ ' - -i , , i 1/L~ •r _ ~ ^ ~ .b biDEuJd.K unwms . ~ fDR AD N4M O } . ~_y'Y#•' . ~ ~ ,~wi° In2~1 FRE HYDREIJT 7 I . ~p 100 ol -o H -I' • , Gc' I il ~y ` t ~ " C - rw ~,rfrU _ ~lHb 3 , ~ ~ ;t / . "F f ' ~ - 17 1 . , ` - ~ i . ~ • " , ~ ' ~ ~ ;i l , _ l ' 1 ~ ~ - • ~ ~ _ , t. ~ , ~4 : • ~.l~ ~ ~ ~ ►1 ~ Z 7 7 AGENDA, FEBRUARY 10, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: (PLEASE NOTE DATE) Thursday, February 10, 1977, 9:30 A. M, Place: Conference Room A, Court HotisP Anr.e.x ZONF C,HAN 3. Z.E-11-77 , Two-Family Residential (R-2) to Residential Officc: a. Loca tion: Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44 , EWM . Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Stoneridge Sub- division. b. Applicant: Wolfland, Inc.(F . V. Seipp) South 717 Pines Road Spokane, Washington 99206 c. Site Size: 43,808 square feet d. Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential (R-Z) e. Proposed Zoning; Residential Office f. Proposed Use of Property: Professional Offices g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4. 21 , Section 4.21 . 04 h, Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this heai-iny ►il:iy whether or not this proposal will have a sig- nificant adverse environmental impact, . , ~~~:~`•EucLIo I AVE , ~ o IV I w ~ 4 . CD • • , ~ 3 ~ ~ 3u r ~ MARIETTA • ~ .AV~. ~ORTN ? a . d h C*__1~°' f u ~ SGA,tF" > oc . . y . 4N~v EL.1965. . SHANNON 'p►v ~ 4 ' I~ r~.~rrl~•'~r~~~.~.• • ,~'1_ . Avw L ft#e.W ~ MONTGOM~Ay R. : ~ ~ . OA . -14- ~ L'DN ~ CkANCE Z: E ~ I 1 .r 77 TW OVAM IC.Y RF.Si OEwTIAL (IZ.2.) TO GQ'SIDQMT14L OFFICE A~(~LICgn~T WpLF!-AN O, ZN G, V. SE! K1-r~ O N N\r\/ C0"E2 pF P114cc> Vit MAR is TTIq A~anax N OR7 N- LOO O F~' ~ O FPI N 90 TilrTE2CNAlJ 6F-' A"^ 4 3, $ol r~ A~ Paor-cwarjAL- OCFicc-s - 2 EqC14 SM66 s-ro&y s-rRwcTUR.ccs AppRo kCpy o o ;d r--Aoo~. Arzcoi - STRutT uRES QRercN'Trio -rcow^0e a AccrsS ?b lPi Nc-5 Ji MA2i QTT - Pc.Aw :Powo~cAT F.s PA'JEo Pa"ll"' LANOSGAQh N'G ALON4 Wrr-.T pRO~ERT y ~A-5 6ZF-cRU,aF-r-> Pma- LAN o U sSS R. ~ AygAL St s PROT Ea.Ty rN QUCI;TIOPJ A&+ qs , ~ Q~ 1 H~ SINbGE. ~AM/~. R~/OFNGF ` M~RKIQr.Au ,4GH ADD, y cAST vACqNT ~ ~Ty _ A(fck.5eo Aop-r Coonan.G,*-, ~ ioLI upi,Ts ~ MFs So wT' H P0792TMG&rr Compt.g,*r S7DN&nrbGe: ~-5 ys cjN,Ts - Mrs W CsT RF,s# Oe#.YT s - CXlc rx6s - R- Z AN~t. S~S JtALI oF 197& - TH IS ComMisS/o~ P?c:v,,Eweo A Zo.iE C N Ar0G iC PRopsn. - S~1M E Gt-Ty "_"V / Sf1 m E I~G.iC,AAJ"r fZF-viSEn PRo~~~~ _ , L-AST ~ALy T NE, PC.p N N 1 n~ G Cornmcssloo-i OEnji~;r.:> ~ / -ZONE CHq/►16r- 1 p-OpSN CAaLING ForL R EZIQWNTl0qC_ O F F t C rc, ZOrwN V O N T H&9" N ORT l4 o02T 16 N 0 4P I HU A4v r~/tT 1 S ia rJ AvGaT7 cl LOCNtZ. 94451A)ESS ZaN ~~v -G oIi TNc- SoctrH e02TlOni Of T'N £ AObwrT tSF-d FVCM7 OLP"NIN comonissloAl Pv=MrlElo#o~4T/Ow W~'S • -TREw I o -7H,E (Sosm,0 a t Co 4 NTy C0#"#vlss1omr,#rS PI-AA".*Ai G CO mrn i SS G o N ~6~o n~~t ~~IOy'rr/oN - UQ~~~~ obkaNc Merao A~r.Ea Ccw~ac, 2~ Co+P c.~a•ti Tw,,,c~-r-ES Onvesrr7 r N Q4cs T`i o.v A s (3Ei N c. - L-ocATF_Q ON TI-}~ CO&C of- A NE16,o9,JboWa"ooe-zo tsoUuodP.y / ZON lm` PLAIQ Fort- PiN cS RoAo TH E IPPA=f~ A S brv N d L'oradr1 ATr. Tp/t Low C ENS " T~ A*".rw N Cr i. L. Si"C.C FAwerL.7 O2 Two 'Fi1pin.y RGSr0.rrTlq4- - P~- I , 5 0 o N ~ ArcTza,A ~ ~ - ADT - C-omNT 7~500 V rsvc.LQ.s aETwEirN -T- 90 4 Tj.sw.* - STAF F- Wowa-o L iKE, 'T+iS Comrh issio to To IV o-E. T H-E-- Cp " CwJkiao"s F-oR. youn, REViEw ZF yptA- SHo4i~p co,isI pC2 %ep-OVAL. pF THI.S (5)AaTIGULA4?. (3RVo~Al( . ~/uV~20h1MfJ~'Tfl~►- A OECL+AaATIDW C7P NOKJ S16NMGIWCE 13£- 7IC-.5 W ED ~ ~ ~ r STAFF RECrJMNI£NDATION Z4NE CHANG T 3 ZE-11-77 - TWC) FAMILY RESIDEN'TIAL (R--2) T4 RESFDENTIAL ()FFICE "4rIULFLAND, INC. Planning Staff Recvmmendatian ADumve to the Residential affice Zan -3. subieet to the fallowincr conditions A C4NDITIaNS 1 Access pertnits for the project shall be obtained from the Spokane Cvunty Engineer's office prior to release of building permits N4TE Access points must meet the approval of the Spokane Gvunty ~ Engineer' g office 2 Improvement of 1Vlarietta Avenue along the proiect perimeter to Spokane Caunty standards Improvement to include sidewalks 3 The advertised property shall be developed in substantfal aon#ormanee with the pl.an on file wf.th thf s application, i e, twa single story pro- fessional office structures with proposed building area of 6500 square feet 4 Thc off-street parking facility and connecting drivewsys shall be devel- Qpod in substantial confarmance with the developmrznt plan Any portion of the praject vvhich is to be accupied or traveled by automobiles shall be mafntained fn hard surface paving Open parkinq areas shall be unlighted except that driveways and walkways may be illuminated by Iow intensity I3.qhtinq ~ 5 An an-site storm drainage system shall be approved by the Spakane County Engineer's affice prior to release of building perm3.ts for #he proiect 6 A specific landscape plan,, planting schetlule and provisions for mafn- tenance, acceptable ta the Spokane County Zoning Admfnistrator, shall be subm3.tted for the pro ject priar to release of builcti.ng permits NOTE Landscape Plan shall demanstrate +cQmpliance with 4 07A 120 o# Spokane Cvunty Zaning Ordinance B REASONS 1 The propased prvfessiQnal affice faci.lity is situated on Pines Road, a major arterial, and lies on the edge of a neighborhood boundary -3- wl- y'W ZE-11-77 - AGR TO COMM (Continued) 2 In recent yEars the Planning Commission has approved a number of zone reclassificatfons to the N~ultiple Family Suburban and the Residen- tial Office Zone classifications along 1\Torth Pines Road (RO-ZE-32-69, MF8 ZE-163-73) 3 The staff is of the opfnfon that the design configuration of the proiect in conjunction with the conditions of approval and the performance standards of the Residential Offfce Zone wfll assure compatibility of the develop- ment with existinq and future land uses in the area C STAFF ENVIRONMEIVTAL REVIEW That a declaration of Non-Siqnificance be issued, in accordance with Section 11 15 ) of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval of" this recommendation hy the Board of County Commissioners, or that any approving action of the Board be conditioned upon issuance of Final Declaration o€ Non-Sfgnificance in accordance with SCE4 11 15 340 NOTE Environmental checklist revfew is in file - 3 A - ~-i ; S~'/a F F ~E~c~ww+Ea~~1T~oa _ ~ 7~F CNAN~= Z E- Il -77- 1Ac,rticuur . 2A,, SU6-rtbAw WoL Np , T~G . . PLA00104., STAr-F- CZECDMMENOATION . Q~~so~s : 1, The Spokane County "Zoning Plan for Pines Road Bc;tween the Freeway and Trent Av2nue", inidcates that the properties with Pin2s Road Frontage b2tween th2 Northern Pacific Railroad right of way and Marietta Av2nue are approp-riate for rastdenttal uses. The Planning Commisston notes thar than r?orth Pines Study dziineates zoning along Pines Road ss follows: a. Between the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way and lrariett3 bE indicated as a low density residential area centered 1round the Trent Gr3dc School: (Single and Two Family Residen- ti3l). " b. Batween N~riatta and Iviansfiald Avenues (both sides of Pines Road) be indlcated as high density residential araa: ( MultEple Family R-esidenttal). c. Bztween Mansfield and Shannon Avenues (both sides of Pines Road) be indlcated as a frc;eNay commerciat or residentiai office are3. NGTE: The Board of County Commiss i oners concurred with the = P la nnI ng Commi s s ion' s recommendation to accept and approva the PlannEng Stzff's study of North Pines Road between Trent Road and the Spokane Valley Freeway. The Board further concurred that the Comprehensive Pl3n for rhe Valley be changed to reflect future land use as outlined by the Planntng Commissi on's Study and Zoning Plan. ~ • ~ ~~5~- : • - ' ~,R.~ tiv ,I . ~ . i d • _L ; _ . ' ~ L. a ~ . f*a Planning Commissi on has been recentiy approv- Ing Resldentlal Office requests on North Pines Road between I-90,- south to Sprague Avenue. Also, the "7oning Plan for Ptnes Road Between the Freeway an-d Trent Avenue" recommends Rasidential Office uses for property along Pines, -south of Mansfleld to Shannon Avenua, but not north of Naansfieid along Pines Road. (See vicinity map of the agenda). . ~ STAF r- G. - That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11. 15. 340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commissioners, or that any approving action of the Board be conditioned upon issuance of Final Declaration of Non-Sir-inificance _ in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340 . _ - s r NoT{' : ~'„~l~~t ~rir•~'r~~; ~,t_ CNELK~sST _kEv ~ r- C. GENERAL DA TA: a~ 1. Locaticn: Section 9, Township 25N., Range 44, EVtirM Lots 1, 2, and 3, block 1 of Stoneridge - ~ Subdivisi on. r 2. Applicant: V: olfland, Ir.c . , South 717 Pines Road Spokana, VvA 99206 3. Site Size: e=3, 817 squarQ feet . 4, Existing Zoning; Two Family Residential, established Feb. 7, 1974 . ~ _ ~ - s -q ~ _ ~ , , ~ ; y ~ ' ' ` • ~ 1,~ ° r r ~'~,'~'~a" - . , ~ • ti'~ • • i ` ~-r. ~n i xt~ w~ ~ ~ ~ ' u~ _ • Q , l ~ 1 ~ r y ~.4~_, ~ _,1a• - , ' 4 . • . ~ o~,~ ~R~'~ ; .i, ~ 1p . ~.f ~MqA R ° t ~ i~. - ~!4~ 1 i-. i . _ b i ~ ' i • ~ ~ ( _ ~ , i. ~ • - . ~ ~ - _ _ _ L - 't . ~ .T . T. , . . P . - . ~ . r • r. , r' c, r J'~ i ~ s.~+~ ~ -•,+4" - . - 'Y," ! 4, ~ _ I' 1 4"rt~ ~ , ~ 1 ~ f ~ ` Ty - ~ y «t ,at... • _ , . _ f _ ! 1, ~ ♦ ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ • ' ,r•~ , ~ y ~ , yl ~ ~ r . ~ ~ ~ _ ~ _ - - F K 1~ k . ~ ~ • ; • ~ `w~ _ r k ~ .,~r= l~k~ +1'~ '~P :•~F ~f•i . y7cf1 ~q► ~ ~ , " ` ~ _ ~E ~Z.,$ :s ~f.:. - ,t:•a"".i ~ ~..:li~ • - _ ~ ~ - - ~;1 T ~1~ ~ j • `s~~ ~ ~'.y~.l, . . ~1~~ ~ ' 1/ . " ;~,z -ir ~ ~ - ~4'r . ~ • Za ~ _ > - • ~ , ~ e 1 y t , . . .F~, ~ Y " ~'~Fi ~ ~ - s { ~Y : ~ M I ~ . . ~ . ~ " 1. ~ ( ~rt ny ; •.y ~~~,~i ~ ~y . . . ~ t ~ ~ ~1. ~ ~ _ _ _ Kl~~ " ~ ~-tl..~~- r`~, _ :~"''„w► .1~ ~ r~r3 ~ ~ I ~ IVIiNUTES JUNE 11, 1976 ZONE CHANGE 6= 4. ZE--46-76 TV, 0 FA1ViILY RESII)ENTIAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS ANID, RESiT1ENTIAL CFFICE W CLF'LANI3, iNC Pianning Commission RecommendatiQn Denv, both the Lvcal Business and Residantia.l Offtce Zone requesks for the follawinq reasons (Vote was unanimous) A. BACKGRCUND The advertised property fs situated an the northwest corner af Pines Road and Marietta Avenue. The applicant proposed tfl construct a 4480 square foot office conaplex on the North 180 feet of the +descrfbed property, and a 1, 920 square foot convenienee grocery store Qn the South 140 feet of the property. The appltcant's request was to change the North 180 feet of the described property from Twa Famfly Residential to Residenrial C)ffiCe, and to change ~he South 140 feet vf the described property firom Two Family ResidentLal . to Locat Business . REASGNS 1. The Spokane County "2oning Plan for Pines Road Between the Freeway and Trent Avenue", inidcates that the properties with Pines Rvad Frontage between the Northern Paciftc Railroad right of way and Marietta Avenue arQ approp,riate for residentlat uses The Planning Cvmmisston notes that tha North Pines Study delfneates zonlrx3 along Pf.nes Road as follvws a Between the Northern Pacffic Railroad rlght of way and Marietta be indicated as a law densf,ty residQntial area centered around the Trent Grade School (Sinqle and Twa Family Residen- tLa t) . b Between 1►Jlariotta and Mans#ieId Avenues (both sides of Pines Road) be indicated as high dznsity residential area ( Niultiple Family ResicleritLal). c. Between rlfansfield and Sh3nnon Avenues (both sides of Pines Road) be indicatad as a free Nay cammercial or resident[al office area - 50 - i `r 1 ZE-46-76 T'1rr C FARfILY RESIDENI'IAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL CFFICE 1,14 GLFLAND' INC, (Continued) NQTE The Board of County Commissi oners concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to accept and approve the Planning Staff's study of North Pines Road between Trent Road and the Spokane Valley Freeway. The Board further cancurred that the Comprehensive P[an for rhe Valtey be chanqed to reflect future land use as outlined by the Planntng Commissi on's Study and Zoning Plan. 2. The zoning plan for Pines Road between the Northern Pacific Ratlroad riqht of way and Marietta calls for residential uses of those properties The Text Portion of the Comprehensive Ptan for Spokane County deflnes residential as a tand use eiement designed to serve existinq and future dwellinq units Aceas designed for residentia! purposes are to remai n free from commercial and fndustrtal uses. ~ 3. The Planning Commission has noL encouraged the proliferation of Local Business Zoning alonq North Pines and the staff c oncludes that the sm311 business site would be an unwarranted intrusion into the resldential neiqhborhood. NOTE The advectised property is surrounded on thres sldes by < resldentlal development. ~ ~ 4 It was noted that the Planning Commtssi on has been recently approv- inq Resldential Office requests on North Pines Road between I-90, south to Sprague Avenue. Rlso, the "7oning Plan for Pines Road Between the Freeway an3 Trent Avenue" recommends Residential ~ Offlce uses for properry atong Pines, south of Mansfleld to Shannon I-venue, but not north of Mansfield 3lorig Pines Road. (See vEcinity raap of the agenda). B. STPFF ENVIRONI1riENTAL REVIEV4T As required in WAC 197-14-320, the sta:ff of the County Planning Commfs- sfon reviewed the envrlonmental checkllst submitted by Mr. F. V. Seipp tn behalf of Vk orfland, Inc. for a zone change to allow constructlon of a convenience Grocery and office complex The proposai is Located approximately fn the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Sectfon 9, Township 25N., Range 44 EViA►z frontinq Pines Road, south of Buckeye Avenue. The pro- ponent is requesting a zane change from Two Family Residentiat to Rosfdentfal Office and Local Business to allow the consructton of a convenience grocery store and an offlce butldtng on a slte of just over one (1) acre !n size. Tha bite is located on relatively fiat terrain with an unmanaqed qrass land vegotatfon cover. The -staff evaluation identified only onL potentially major impact area, that of fncreased motor vehlcle traffic aw -he secondary impacts therewith. This would inciude such impacts as nt reased air pollutlon{cacbon monixide - 51 - I ~ ZE-46-76 ZVIO FANILY R£SIDENTIAI. TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND RESIDEATIAL GFFICE Vv QLFIAND, IRjC (Conttnued) and suspended partlculates), increased notse levels, and the increased Pubtic safety hazard of vehLcie accidents. However, due to the relatively small size of the praposal, these impacts are considered tnsigni€icant. ~ The concluslon of the revtew of this environmental checklist is that no siqnificant environmental Impacts wlll likely result from the proposal. Therefore, it is recommended that a Dectaration of Non-Signlficance be tssued and an environmental impact statement aot be required. C. GENERAL DATA l. Locatlon Sectlon 9, Township ZSN., Range 44, EIPIrM Lots 1, 2, and 3, block 1 of Stoneridqe Subdivlsi on. 2. Applicant V1 olfland, Inc South 717 Pines Ro3d Spokane, VVA 99206 3. Site Size 43, 817 square feet , 40 Existing Zoninq Two - Famlty Residential, establfshed Feb. 7, 1974 5. Proposed Zoning Local Business and Residentfal Office 6. Propose3 use of property Oifico and Convenfence grocery storo . 7 Appllcatton of Zonf ng Pro vis ion Chapter 4. 21, Section 4. 21.0 40 ~ ~ O Z F Z A IT~ INC E 11305 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99206 09) 926-9521 May 2, 1984 Wally Hubbard, Director Spokane County Planning Commission N 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Sir Action of the Board of County Commissioners March 10, 1977, identified as Resolution No 77-259, set forth the requirements for use of Lots 1, 2 and 3. Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision This week application was made for a permit to build on the property which we believed brought us into full compliance Although no ULID or bond was required in accordance with that resolution, we are told we must bond for a strip of sidewalk approximately 120 feet in length which we do expect to put in place The County has the right to withhold an occupancy permit in the event that upon completion of the project this requirement has been complied with Your oversight attention to resolving this matter at the earliest date would be appreciated Very truly yours, WOLF ND, INC c r Alvin J W f Chairman AJW/bt cc John R McBri de ~2 ytn F Keith Shepard Grant Peterson MrIvu ~ ECEIVEU c~ F,ipy ot, 1484 SPOitANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ALVIN J WOLFF INC REALTORS Comp/ete Rea/ Estate Service ~ i N0 7`~ 259 BEFOU THE BOARD OF CO'IJNZ'Y COMM88IONERS OF sPOKANs COUN'ff, WASHINCTOIV' ZE-11-77 YN TH£ MATTER OP CHANCING THE Z0MNG ~ NIAP FROM TWO FANlILY RE$IDENITIAI. (R-1) ~ TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE 011T FROPERTY ) RESOLUTION IAGATED IN SECTiON 9, TOWRTSHUP 25 N, ) RANGE 448 B W. M , SpOKANE COUNTY, ) WASHIIVGTDAT ~ The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for heatfng before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane Gounty, Waghingttfn, on thi$ day, and It appearinq to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice o€ the hearing on tha matter in the mariner end for the time provided by law, that said Planning CommisstQn has held a public hearing as xequired; and that the said Planning Comrnis- slon cancurs in the plan to aone the gollowing described propetty as: RESIDENTLAL OFFICEs, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision, Section 9, Township 25 N, ]Range 44, E.VIT. M., Spokane Counfiy, Wa►shington NOW, THEREFORE, IIE iT RFSOL1lED, that the above-desoribed propetty be, and the same is zonod undec the classificatlon of RESIDENTIAL OFFICE as defined in the Zoninq Orciinance of Spokane County, advpted August 25, 1953, as amended. AATD FURTHER BE IT RLSOLVED that any development on the above-described propecty shatl be sub'eCt to the following Coraditfons: 1) Access petmite fo* the proiecst shall be obtalned from the Spokane County Engineers' office prioc to releaae of buflding permits. NOTE. Access pofnts must meet the approval of the Spokane CountY Engineers' offiCe. 2) Improvement mf Marietta Avenue along the proJect petimeter to Spokane County staridarals Improvement to include sidewalks 3) The advertised property shall be developed in substantla3 conformance with the plan on fiie with thls applioatian, 1, e, two single storY professfonal of€fce structurea wi#h proposed bullding ar'ea of 9700 square feet. 4) The off-street Aarking facility and connectinq driveways shall be developed In substantial con€otraance vuith the development plan. Any portion of the ppDjeat whioh is to be occupied or traveIed by automobiles shall be main- tained in hard swrface paving OAen parklng areas shall be unlighted exaept that driveways and walkways may be llluminated by 1ow intensity lighting. 5) An on-sfte storm drainaae aystem shall be approved by the Spokane County , Engineers' office prfor to release of buiiding permita for the project. 6) A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provfaions for maintenance, accteptable to the Spokane County Zoning Adminfsttator, shall be submitted for the proiect prior to release of building permits. NOTE: The landscape plan shall demonstrate compliance wlth 4. 09'A 120 of the Spokane County Zontng Ordinance PASSEXJ BY THE BOARD TIIIS la DAY OF 19770 -i_ BOARD QF COUNTY COMMISSiONMS OF SPOKANE C:OUNTY, WA$IUNGTON . JLRRY 1 ~ .~t PET, CHM. HA~~Y ~ anly&jf . RISTENSEN ~ ATrEsT: VERNoN W. oHLANn ' Cler the Bo ~ r ~ i BY_ D v This is to cettify that this is a true ay~orir~~~„~p~r of Resolution l~o ' gassed by the ' Boaais " day of ~ ~ , 1977 , tt, J BY=Y~ ~ _ ~p~ufiy ' S 1 I hereby certify that T have posted the above Qhanges $nd revisions on the Zoning Map in the Buildf`ng Codes bepartmenf, and do furttier csertify that the zona classffication ohange ie the same as desoribed above and shovvr► mn the attaohed map. SIG1V~~: DATADt ~ ► , ~ -2~ ' S PIC R£F. f[j?=C-a- 77 THRESHOLD I}ETERMIIVATIOPJ . .~i I • D£CLAktA7`IU1+1 C1F (proposed/ . - .-J.AMC CJLV°. _.:UVr /nonsignificance) 1. I?esGription of Prvaaosai: _ZA#jF f~~ ~W/CQ& VtAo 4FA MZA y 7-P 4_ v,.Af A "w o-4) ; 2. Propt~nent: --WQL#" )A JL~~s 5t'~~.0A) 3. CQntact Persan: 'r. (K. ~"'1,~"~' Phane: 3. Coun ty Action (s) Reque sted : ZQAW 6 1 eAe-v&M 'M x G''aL&C&M*L 4. Lacatfon of Proposal; „;I4/ 4:EgW +~f~'~"•~ ~~y,,._,,,,' ~ r 5. Lead Agency: SPC3KANE CC7UNTY, WASHINGTQN This propasal has been determined to A107- have a sz.gnificant adverse fmpaet on the environment. An Ei5 is D"r required under RCW 43. 21C. 03 0(2) (c).' Thf s clecisiQn was made after review by the County of a cc►mpleted environmPntal cheeklist and Qthi~,r fnforma~iun on fiie witYt the lead agency, n. Responsfble Official: Prvposed Declaratian: Final Declaration: I (name ) f-eltO L. 0L'a`f44" (name) .JER.L1 C. W.0 ~T - , , sicrnature) s# atureK `c4_ 11L~ Ltitle1 QIIZ~,~, ~ (title) 11 r~ 4j?- dept ~ l (de t 0.Q'r CQ . G oM rY'1 . da e (date) ? ! 7 / l -7'' , f , . . Department Reference No.: ZE I 1 '!77 (See Reverse •Side) . NIINUTES FEBRUARY 17, 1977 ZO NE C HANGE ZE-11-77 - TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL fR-2a TO RESIDEIVTIAL OFFICE WOLFLANDt INC Planning Commission Recommendation Approve to the Residential Office Zone r sub - ,iect to the followinqr conditions (On motion for approvai, four voted aye and one no ) A CONDITIOATS 1 Ao-jes s permits for the pro ject shall be obtained from the Spokane County E yineers' office prior to release of buildfng permfts Pv~ TE Access points must meet the approval of the Spokane County Enqineers' office 2 Improvement of Marietta Avenue alonq the proiect perimeter to Spokane County standards Improvement to include sfdewalks 3 The advertised property shall be developed in substantfal conformance with the plan on file with this application, i e, two single story professional office structures with proposed building area of 9700 square feet 4 The off-street parkinq facility and connectinq driveways shall be devel- oped in substantial conformance with the development plan Any portion of the pro ject which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving Open parking areas shall be unlighted except that driveways and walicways may be illuminated by low intensity lighting 5 An on-site storm drainage system shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineers' office prior to release of buflding permits for the pro ject 6 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provf sions for main- tei)ance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator, shall b- submitted for the proiect prior to release of building permits Ivl.-- 1`E The landscape plan shall demonstrate compliance with 4 07A 120 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance B REASONS 1 The proposed professional office facility is situated on Pines Road, a major arterial and lies on the edge of a neighborhood boundary - 5 - ZE-I1-77 - TWO FAMILY TO RES, OFF. (Continued) 2 In recent years the Planning Commission has approved a nurnber of zone 1 L.13ssiffcations to the Multiple Family Suburban and the Residential Clilice Zone classifications along North Pfnes Road kPU- ZE-32-69, MFS ZE-163-73) 3 The Planning Commission fs of the opinion that the design confiquratfon of the proiect in coniunction wfth the conditions of approval and the per-' formance standards of the Residential Office Zone will assure compatibiL lity of the development with existing and future land uses fn the area C STAFF EYWIROIVMEIVTAL REVIEW That a declaratiLon of Non-Significance be fssued in accordance with Section 11 15 340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prfor to approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commfssioners, or that any approving action of the Board be conditioned upon issuance of Final Declaration of Non-Sfgnificance in accordance with SCEO 11 15 340 NOT£ Environmental checklist review is fn file D GENERAL DATA 1 Location Sectfon 9, Township 25 N, Ranqe 44, E V►T M Lots 1, Z, and 3, Block I, Stoneridge Subdivision 2 Applicant Wolfland, Inc (F V Seipp) South 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99246 3 o Size 43,808 square feet 4 Existing Zoning Two Family Resident#al (R-2) 5 Proposed Zoning Residential Office 6 Proposed use of property Professional Offices 7 Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4 21, Section 4 21 044 8 Environmental Impact A topic of discussfon at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal wi11 have a significant adverse environmental impact -6- ~ ~t SPOKANE COUNTY PLANMNG DEPARTMENT i [ PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFfERSON STAEET 1 PHONE 458-2274 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 89201 SPOKANE COUNTYCOURTMOUS! MEMORANDUM T O ~"J~ ~ AM-4 D1 ST 4.'1'fW L"V 1 t 14EA1.14 FRO M S pokane County Planning Department N 811 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99201 Attention J04A1 -W DATE R E F E R E N C E Attached Propo sed Declaration of Non-Sfgnificance and Environmental Checklist for I ~ --7? Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be one of jurisdiction, WAC 197-10-040 (4) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your right to review and comment as pro- vfded in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advised th t t proposal was listed in the SEPA Public Information Center on Z%~ { SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIN'G I3EPARTMENT t PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET r PHONE 458-2274 ~ SPOKANE WASHINGTdN 99201 5 O A E COtlNT COLR7 HpUSE LEAD AGENGY DESICNATION OF SP(JKANE COUNTY Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a divisinn of Spokane County, has determfned that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, Xs the LEAI1 AGENCY for the foliowing descrfbed project Z,E-The followxng is explanation for thf s datermi.nation VVA)c~ L41 -i - ; a Determination for Spokane County By Name jaH4o sw E; =Ee . Title N ' Date Z~~S/V r- SPOKAlVE Ct?UNTY , PLANNING COMMISSIOIV ~ ~I tiJ ~ ~ i N 8 11 JeFFMsotv f ~aQ J IA.,E. ~ SP+DKANS, WABH1N63TON 99201 JAY~a 7Z ,r 13 ~ ~`4 1r,tf } 9 , ~7 a L- T D Hamxlton E 10204 13th Spokane, V4rA 99206 ~WT DEU4ERABLf ~ /'p,t~AE w~- ~A'ka QDI3RESStiD 1nN ~ 31 -9 k hh6LE TO FORVJARD 0 p Mr Vi "RA TO SENDER ~ _ _._t_ . : • ~ - i r; ` I I DEPT. FILE REF. Zr 77 ~ ;~I I Y~ +y 9- 2S• - 7 3_~;' • '~I , . SP a~aNt ``N TY `°::Gr 5£ STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the O"A/&i" The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action Reques ted: ZQAL= CMAffiaC &AH T" "W/ALY tsS/QEUVTI~L To Re-i /Ol~71/7"7►~t. OF,Fic t- I B. Description of Proposal: 73tO qjywiCig au/[.DiwlGS dg AAPACV- C. Location of Proposal: SEG17~A/ rs 2 wNe 3. 6t6c~r ~ ~j .rMN§-.r.odd6- ,s II. Review of Checkli.st: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: ~.A 63) aTF.v1,~ (s)-A 7) 6 LA-B-C Oio 0(a) gob C, F ( Over) B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discus sion of impacts identified above: _Lw A&Rd~w ~y~lc /~yO,~TS GdagA ae M~lAA tY7VE A& C eAl~ IMnls g- k 1 A~brP lly#"r (3) A.~&-tiT?o&~l ~iPA1~ Z "h/lllpe f~t IAc i ~~r -L.~1~QS~'APVK~i J,~'~''' 1) A - Ml NO9 t J4P LT . 12-1-e-AgAMAWAle. . ~ 7) -l/L~►~rlA/G AC,A111, co~~ ~ ttMg w.nr .~A4ftAMdrr ca,easaw's AVP MiNOR a&,$& ( 13) A kC - RLOdr&iv av dAtr.Wits C,8Z Olf) - ~.A~~- ~1/.4~s~✓.o~ AAJO &I1JditlW" &SPT. Lip) A/CA47N elsrlPlCT AIVD AMMAAF &OAf III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on II A, B and C above, the staff r+nff%„e,e_t Z2ygr Zy& -JAI&.4 A/AI1F StiNjPjGl►W'' a~ ~~•~~~e- &iVv/A ' ,~h jtC9oMMe,d&S '7WAStuAAc~ ~ ~ ~&eZ.4,rA7MAj e/r AM6/6Ali&CAAW ~ _ ~'~t _.F_..~:. I Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Ghaptei- 43.21C, RC-VV, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a m-ajor action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the decrree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you ~ believe an explanation would be.helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review cvit►iout unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future . No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination, NOTE: This is a standard form being useci by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. . Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. 1 ' ~ . . , ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM i , BACKGROUND ~ 1, Name of Proponent: ~4 `4l9 All) YC . I . . 2, 1lddress and Phone Number of Proponents'..,~/ 7-~//✓,=7S as 9.2- 3. D,3te Checklist Submitted: 77 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County 5, Na me of Proposal, if Applicable : 6. Natiire and arief Descriptioii of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- standing of its scope and nature): a - • ~ • . * i J ~ 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affecEed by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal) : ^ . -Aal . ~ 8, Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Aor - 9, List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required fcr the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones): ~ • 2 . , . (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS ITiADEQUGTE, PLEASE ATTACI-i ?1DDITIONAL PIIGES.) 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this pro osal ? If yes, explain: . ~ 11 . Do you know of any plans by otl-iers may affect the property covered by your proposal ? If yes, explain: 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: ✓YI~Q II, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers arE required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth . Wi11 the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ? . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , , , (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features . ~ (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? , . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of ~ the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: ~ ooo 1,67 3 ~ i ► r . . , (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Y,= M.ayhe ED 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . , . . . , X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ~ Explanation• . , • r 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters ~ (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff ? . , . . , , ~ • (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ~ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? . . . . . . . . (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Lxylanation: i 4 r ! ` ~i S i~: . . ~ , C ~ . 1 . . . . . ~ r . ~ . , . ~ . - , ~.l . _ _ , . , _ _ _ . - , . . . . . ' I . . \ ; . . _ ! : . . e 1..~.a:~ i."T . , ' T. . 4. Flora , Vti'ill the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, gra s s, ~ crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? r j - (b) Reduction of the numhers of any unique, rare or endangered specie s of flora ? (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . , , , . , . , , , , , , ~ (d) Reduction in acreage of any a ricultural crop ~ Explanation: ~~1r i Yes Maybe No 5. Fauna, Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the di~,,ersity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birrls, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, , insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . , , , , . , , . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, oz- endangered species of fauna? . , . , . . . . . , , (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a ba:rier to-the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Dt-terioratjon of existinrr fish n- wildlife hahitat? , Ye MaYbe No 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?,.. ~ . Explanation: ~ + .r t , (TF SPACE F'UR EXPLANATION IS INADEQU'ATE, PLEP,SE ATTACH ADbITIQNAL PAGES,) Yes Maybe No 7, Liqht and Glare, Will the propasal produce new light or glare ? EXpXaTtatIOTI : r ~ r ► Yes Nfavbe No 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the ~ present or planned land use af an area ? Expianation: -kV44-4 -AA Yes Mavbe No 9. Natural Resaurces. VITill the proposal r-esult in, (a) Increase in the rate of use of any naturai resources (b) De-pletf.on af any nanrenewable natural resource? , . , . Explanation: Ye s Maybe No 10. Risk of LToset, Does the proposal involve a risk af an ~ expIC3SiQri OT" the re].ease of hazardous substances {incTudi,ng, but nQt ],imited to, oil, pesticides, chemfcals, or radiatian) in the event af an accident vr upset canditions ? . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: 6 J . . , (IF SPACE F+DR £XPLANATIC7N IS INADEQLTATE, PL£ASE ATTACH AI7DITIONAL PA+GES.) Yes Maybe Na 11. Population. Will tFie proposal alter the lacation, ~ distributiran, density, or growth rate af the human gapula tion of an area ? , . , . . . . . . . . , , , , , Explanatian. 12. Housinq. WiI,I the prapasal affect exfsking hausing, or create a ciemand far additional hausing? . . , , , , , , , ~ Lxpl.anation: Yes Maybe No 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the propasal result in: ~ (a) Generatian of additional vehicular mQVement? . . . . . (b) Effects on exisking parking facilities, ar demand for new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JL- (c) XmpaGt upon existing transportation systems? (d) ATterations to present patterns of circulakian ar movenzent af people and/or goods? , . . . . . . . . (e) Alteratians to waterborne, rafl or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazarcis to motor vehicles, bicycYists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ♦ ~ ~ ExplanatiQn: . . ~ . Yes Niaybe No 14. Publfc Services. Will the praposal have an effect upon, ~ or result fn a need far new or aitered governmental services in any af the follawi,ng areas {a} Fire protecti.on? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (la) Police protecti,on? . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . 7 ~ . ' ~ • • (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No (c) Schools ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (d) Parks or other recreational facilities ? . , , , , . , . ~ (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads ? , , . ~ - ~ (f) Other governmental services? . , . , , , , , , , . ~ Explanation: Yes Maybe No 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ~ (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 7- Explanation: • Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . , . . , , , , , , , 'K (b) Communication systems ? . , . . , . , , . , . , , Y ' (c) W3ter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Xr (d) Bemmzpew septic tanks ? AL _ (e) Storm water drainage? ~ 4 t,>/'i' (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . JL _ . ~ 000 Explanation: ~ ~Y . ~ . 8 ti . . ~ . . , (IF °PACE FOR L.,'`CPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Mavbe Nn 17. Human FiealLli. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential liealth hazard (excluding mental hoal.r.h) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . E;•;planation : Ves Mayhe No 18. Aesthetics. Z~1ril1 thP proposal result in tlie obstruction a? any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive sit~. open to public view? , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the ~ Qlldllty Or Qital'`:t1~V ->f ~-_xicl"ipr'r rr3"rr~,3f"tc)T"1?~ . . _ . ~ ExQlanaticn: I 20, Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an Yes Maybe N alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . , , . . , , , , . , . ~ Explanation: ! . ~ III. SFGNATURE I, the undersigned, state thak to the best af my knowledge the above information is true and camplete. It is understood that the lead ageiicy may withdraw any declaration of nonsigniticance that it rnight issue in reliance upon thxs checklist should there be any wiliful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Propanenk: ~ ~ c / (Please Print or Type) Proponen t: LC3 D L rL AA1l) tl~c r, Address: 7 R .6 . Phone: ir Parsan compieting form: > • ~ ~ dAAEZR~ p h on e: 9"_ e_*.a~~ Date: . Dept. or C)ffice of Cvunty Reviewing Ghecklist: AG( ~1~► 6$T- 5taff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: ID , Fred L. Day harsh Director, Planning Commission Page 2 ZE- 139-77 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. ZE- 1-77 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. vfi- 11-77 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. ZE- 15-77 - This area is covered by adequate mains and hydrants. ZE- 17-77 - There are existing mains in this area but hydrants will be needed. ZE- 19-77 - There are existing mains in this area but hydrants will be-needed. Si ncerely-; , ~ . . A1 Cook Lt. of Inspections Fire Prevention Bureau AC:cy R E C E I V E FEB 41977 sPOKaNE couNTY PLAMNING pEPARTMENT -r- ~ , R E C E I P. DatP 19 . ~ J3 41 Received From_-IA/ Address ~N w--,ASi+ ~ po! Fo rf-A,•!yi2cro+"C^rrni.- lA~4,,A a 2 ZE7- f I-7-: raCCOUNT ~ HOW PAID A iA T. U F I I ~ CASH I I LBOrAmm CoUNTY PI.ANNING COMMISSION ACCOUNT "*•MT. PA10 ~ I CHECK I 4 nADUECE I I O DMONEY ER 8K8a6 • n . . e. ~ , ~3. STF FF ENVIRONmz114TAL REVIEV+T ~ 4 As required ln WAC 197-10- 320, the staff of the County Pl anning Cammis- sion reviswed the envrionmental checklist submitted by Mr. F V Selpp En behalf of V'% olfland, Iac, for a zone chanqe to allow construction of a canvQnlance Grocery and of#ice complex. The proposal is located approximatoly ln the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section S. Townshtp 25N , Range 44 EV'Y M frontinq Pines Road, south of Buckeye Avenue. The pro- ponont is requestinq a zone chanqe from Two Famlly Resideattal to ~ Rosidenttai Offtce and Local Business to allow the consruction of a conventenca qrocory store and an office bulldinq on a site af just over one (1) acre in slze. The site i8 located on r elatively flat terrain with an unmanaqed qrass land vegotatlon cov;r. . The ~staff evaluatton identified only or a potertially major impact area, that ~ of lncreased motor v4hicle trafffc an3 the sacondacy impacts therewith This would include such impacts as I icreased a!r pollution(carbon mor~ixide , - 51 - zcs~ svsp3ncied ozArticulateg), in:raaved notse lavels, atzd tho increased P•+.ol!c safet;r hazarca of 1rehicle 3ccidenLs. However, duo to tha r3lati valy saiall 312.0 of tho propokca2, thQSe impacts ara conslder.-ad lns+aniflcent ,ehu conclusion of t he r3v'ew of this environmentat chocklist is that no slqnlftaant envlronmental impact~ v+rill li;:eiy result farom tne proporiaI fheroforo, ft is recommonded that a Doc laree ton of Yoa-Stf gnificanc3 bo +bst.od arid an onvironmantal lmpacr statemant not he requ:red. ~ 1 ~ J ' w 'y' ~'+E 4 b JKANE COUNTY NEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Corrmuni cation Date February 8, 1977 TO Spokane Countq Planning Commisaion FROM Eugene C Prather} R S p SUBJECT Impact Assessment_pn ;zc,tundwate_rby Proposed 2_ene Ch~up - ZE-11-77 WOLFLANA A Individual subsurface diaposal sewage syetems have been proposed for treatment and disposal of sewage generated within the project This raises the question of significance of the impact on the grouadwater in the area and possible alternative8 for sewage disposal B In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study*, Dr Todd considered typical soils, natural and aewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valleq upon the quality of the groundwater In sumnmary, he concluded that (1) In normal precipitatfon years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater (2) All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater Kowever, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of a groundwater flow line indicate Chat the maximum range of (dissolved) solids consentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the-natural groundwater background of 155mg/1 The forecast qear 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101mg/1 above the natural background " "The analytical results of the forecast impact at year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leach- ate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level " C Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 0 3 to 1 0 ppm A projected incremental increase using Dr Todd's expected 8 6 precent would result in ranges from 0 31 to 1 09ppm Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to lOppm D Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics (1) Collector and central treagment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology These systems are not currently economically available for this project (2) Sealed systems, whether indfvidual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal of sludges These systems require more land area than a conventional sub- surface drainfield Some such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance Land, installation and operational costs are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields SCHD-ADM-118 _ i. ~ p► Page 2 February S. 1977 (3) Special diaposal systems using various methods of irrigatioa or using evapotrans- piration have had insufficient use in this area to validate deaign criteria. Irrigation requires effluent disinfection in most cases These systems also require relatively large areas for year around operation. Land and some operational costs are more than those for septic tanks and drainfields Agaia, without a specific additional treatment to remove diasolved solids or completely sealing the dispusal area from percolation, some dissolved salts will be carried with effluent recharge to the groundwater E. Historically, urban density development has resulted in polluted groundwater beneath the develapment and increased values of land to the extent space for individual sewage dis- posal drainfields is too expensive for that use P' Conclusion (1) The use of subsurface sewage disposal systems for this project will have a negligible impact on the water quality (Z) The development of this project in conjunction with other surrounding urbanizing project can be expected ultimately to have at least a moderate impact on the water qualitq paf * THE EFFECT OF APPLIED SURFACE WATERS ON GROUNDWATER QUALITY IN THE SPOKANE VALLEY David K Todd, Sectioa 608 Water Resources Study - Metropolitan Spokane Region, Corps of Engineera, Department of the Army, Seattle District, April 7, 1975 ~E C~f a r 1 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Comuni catlon Date January 31, 1977 TO Spokane County Planning Commission FROM Eugene C Prather, R S EIW SUBJECT ZE - 11 - 77 Two Family Residential to Residential Office The site is in an area where soils are usually suitable for use of on-site sewage disposal systems However, the site lies over the Spokane Aquifer which is currently under consideration by EPA as a "sole source" ps b R E c E I v E FE8 119T7 spoKAbE couaTrr PLAaNInG DEPARTMEaT SCHD-ADM-118 At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or agafnst, the granting of this application AGENDA, FEBRUARY 10, 1977 TELEPHONE 1V0. 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time (PLEASE NOTE DATE) Thursday, February 10, 1977, 9 30 A.M Place Conference Room A, Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) 7.ONF C.HANCF_ Ki r"' t y ~ - - o U L~(21Q.5 3 7.F.-11-77 . Two Familv Residential (R-2) to Residential Office i ~ ~~~L:-( N~ a. Loca tion S ection 9, Township 25 N, Range 44 , EWM Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Stoneridge Sub- division. b. Applicant Wolfland, Inc. (F V. Seipp) South 717 Pines Road Spokane, Washington 99206 c. Site Size 43,808 square feet d. Existing Zoning Two Family Residential (R-2) e Proposed Zoning Residential Office f. Proposed Use of Property Professional Offices g. Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4 21, Section 4.21.040 h. Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at thfs hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a sig- nificant adverse environmental impact. EUGLiO 1 AvE ~ - . O ic ~ v ~ ew ~/.7P ~rCc N 1J 4-*"" m 2 AW& a W a,vrAA 'Owd /14 /ad • ~ 7p G+d.A IJ oo ~ ~ a ~ MARIE i TA . av~ % . d : ~ . ~ m , sC14~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ EL 1965 SHANNON F. . ~ -~~---t-~ss:r= •'._r~ ~ ~ • 1 v+v t,isw.M► ~ ' INON760MEAY QA. c +►'~+s i S~17t . ~ ARY -14- ZE-11-77 A hearing to consider changing the Zoning Map from Two Family Residential (R-2) to Residential Office on property described as Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Stoneridge Sub- division, Section 9, Townshfp 25 N, Range 44, E W M, Spokane County, Washington ('West side of Pines Road, north of Marietta Avenue.) AFFIDAVIT OF PQSTING STATE 4F WASHINGTON ) ) SSo COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) .S~l~ /~►~D~b/G~A',ZSk/ , Being first duly sworn, deposes and says That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The IIn,ited States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years o That on i 19~, he personally posted three (3) true and correct d~~f the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HFARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-r+rit ~ 20 VO ~ . 3. r°, t.to ~ Subscribed and aworn to me ~ 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND F4R SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHLXP.'1)N Residing at Spokane, Washhington APPLICATION FOR SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMNIISSI0I~ Z O N I N G H E A RI N G Court House, Spokane, ti4ashington I?ate : pgcember 20, 1977 Application No.: ZE-11- 7 7 ilaine of Applicant: ~✓/n ~treet r.ddress; v ~ 7 b.,.City: State: TeleplZOne No. ; -F.~.isting Zoning classification: Two Fainily Residen-Lial (R-2) Date Existing Zone Classification Established; ie? - L7 -7~ Proposed 7one Classification: Residential C; tiice Proposed Use of Property: ~~T ~ L. OFF/ , Prznc~JopALb~~c~-s ) 1 T,Pnal Descriptinn of Pronerty: . -TOTI►l_ AREA Sfte '7;ize: , 9 ;;ection: 9 Township: M Range: atreet ~'zddress of Property: vVho Holds Title to the Property: If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your inte: est in it ? Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within :UO feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. tiLL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS VtUST BE ANSVVERED: 1. v✓nat are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning 'e YL ' . _ ♦ ~ a\ ' ~ ,,..r► 2. vvhat facts j ustify the proposed zrne reclassification based on the advancement of the public health, safety,, and gengral welfare : ~ I G f 3. -vvhat effect will the proposed zone reclassifiGation have carr the value and character of ada acent property : / 2 Z&~ Can a reasonable return :Eram or reasonable use rf1.f i r rr}i , , . . , . . _a Scale of the drawing. ~ (b) iVarth point. (c) All dimensions of property, existing buildings, and progoseci buildings, t-- (d) Location caf all existi.ng and praposed buildings, ar additions, with dimensians to the nearest praperty line. (e) Off-stzeet parking area . ~-f (f) Defined Foints af access and egres s.~--`(9) Date of the drawing. TI-IE NECESSARY FEE NUST ACC+rJMPANY THIS APPLFCATIOIV, The recommendation of the Planning Commission in this matter will be presented to the Baard of County Commissi.aners for final action. Any person desiring tca contest the recommendatian caf the Planning Commission must request, in writing, a hearing before the Board of County CommissiQners no later than ten (10) days foiiowing the date or the, public hearing held by the P1anring Commission, (Signe LDST OF OWNERS AND PIIRSONS rw tING TAXES ON PROPERTY Spokane County Code Number : ZE-11- 77 Owners and Persons within 400 feet e ~ Application is for a Zone Chancte, Two Familv Residential ' 1 Office L~~ l % Certification of Title Comtiany: I hereby certify that the following lis. of names and addresses consisting of this and the following pages has been prepared from the latest availabl ecords d i o t best of my knowledge correct. . % Signed b ~ Fo QJ ` (Title Company) Date : , LAST GRANTEE IlV CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LpTS BLK FERS ONS PAY ING TAXES (T) I O ? MTRARFATT RAN!-'N ~ I T' ~ ~ 0 Jack D. Tieaen 09.~1-Q9 5? TI Fidelitv Mtl.Sv. Bk, 3-1-30411-02 T.n t 1 4 .aA.L- qrA a ~ 01 William Odom Q2 i - f T j lst Bk N~tQ. KTPT 17588-SW O,Cloverleaf, Inc. O9541-n954 I T iFidelitv Mtl. Sv. B?:. 3-1-26548-7 Lat -1 A 0, G.A. TISherwood & Roberts Inc. 2420000 U - " LQI 4 q O, K. L. Henderson, Jr. 0,2541-045~ T Sherwood & Roberts Inc. 2420000 Lot 5 q 0 Ray M. Jones - = 09541,-_095,7 T Rainier Mtq. L-30~-5-Q00037 Lot 6 q 0 Joan M. Davi s 9 5 41 -(l 9 5 S ~ T Rainier Mtc~. ,L-303-5-000010 Ln t- 7 9 ~ - 0 Bf.{'A,-.rrC ~~t, ~-ompton l-Z 0 9 5 „1 _ 0 9 59 T;Rainier Mtq. IL-303-5-000006 Lot 8 ~ ~i~~r.' /f~ v~ , ) +.Z / JC ^ nV~-(~ 9„5 41 - 0 9 h n 0 J.~. S oo rfe r (l ~ T' Rainier Mtq. IL-303-5-00004~ ~fi q Q ' (Coritinued on next page) ~ LIST OF GWiVEE:;"") t;N"D FEri ~0I1S F'''.YIiIG TA::IE5 GN Pi;GPER`i 1 LAST GRANTEL :IN CHA IIi ~ ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AC1D ~D~RESS LGTS EL;: PERSOI`IS PAYING TAXES (T) . 0 ,~1•"~~:-. a 6~~ 0 9 5 41- 0 9 61 . . , T Rainier Mtg. 303-5-000044 Lot 10 9 p D.P. LaVigne ,~7~ -"-1 09541-1071 T Daniel P. LaVigne N. 4408 Madison Lot 10 10 i p Marvin E. Macy 0P~541-1446 / T Bancshares Mtg. ~ 15-01570 Lot 1 14 p James E. Poole ~ r 09541-1447 ~ Securit Pacific Mt 191757 ~ 2 Y ~ 14 p C.M. Carroll 09541-1560 1 Rainier Mtg. L-303-5-000031 kGot 1 15 p Wm. D. Slookey D9541-1561 T Rainier Mtg. L-303-5-000025 ~ot 2 15 , 0 B.J. Songhurst 9541-1562 0 T Rainier Mtg. 146-5-808026 ~ot 3 15 p James A. Frye 99541-1563 d 1 T Rain \er .Mt(~. L-303-5-000017 Lot 4 15 p 09541-1564 - . T Columbia Mtg. L-803394-6-SP-3 Lot S 15 0 T Stoneridge SubdivisiorL 0 Wolffland Inc. ./7~~`.__~- 09541-2301-02-03 T Alvin J. Wolff S. 717 Pines Lots 1-2-3 1 0 V.W. Russell I 109541-2401 T Community S& L 55000575 Lot 1 2 (Continucd on r.ext page) ~ : . . LIST OF ~',ND I'ERSGP~S P:;YIiIG ~1~1,_f.L5 Gi`I PROPr~k`i`i LAST GRANTEL IN CHAIN i ADDITION OI' TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSOI`IS FAY ING TAY.ES (T) , . 0 R.G. Stochofsky 09541-2402 J r T Robert G. Stochofsky E. 13014 Sprague Lot 2 2 p Spokane Viy. Ch." Co, . 09541-2403 % T Community S&L. 55000560 Lot 3 2 p J. J. N ew 1 a nd 0 9 5 41- 2 4 0 4 Alvin J. Wolff I S. 717 Pines Lot 4 T ~ 2 o Wm. R. Sleeth ~ 09541-2405 T Alvin J. Wolff S. 717 Pines Lot S 2 0 G.A. Gesinger 09541-2406 Alvin J. Wolff S. 717 Pines ~Lot 6 2 T 0 Alvin J. Wolff ~ 09541-2501 T Alvin J. Wolff S. 717 Pines Lots 1-2 3 ' 0 Harry I. Kasper 09541-2503 4- T Alvin J. Wolff S. 717 Pines Lot 3 3 0 T PINECRAFT ADDITION 0 Stoneridge Apt. Y'• -4~~ 09541-1610 T Federal National Mtg~.FNMA-1-46-780643-7 Tr 15-16-17-13-19 0 T SECTIO~ 10 TWP 25 N. RANGE 44 EWM 0 T 10542-9011 p Edna M. Dutton W. 1723 Mansfield S. 26 2/3 Rods of the West T Edna M. Dutton 60 rds of the NV1 1/4 of (Continued on next page) ~ , . . LIST OF 0WNERS AND PERSGPIS FA'YING TAXES GN PFtOPERTY L11ST GRANTEE IN CHA IN i OF TITLE (0) AND ADDITION AD~RESS , LOTS BLK P~RSOrIS PAYING TAXES ( T) 0 th e NW 1/4 _ a nd_ fi,he ,IT 22., 1/ 3 T :rds of W=1Qg,~s -Qf~Sw 1 /4 0 of NW 1/4 T i p L..D. Banks _ `Y~ ~ 6 `410542-9..0.,4a. . . . T Lincoln Mtl. Sv. Bk.j 6-1-2567-0 jS. 2-9 0 „f t. of_ W0 . f S: ~ 0 30 rds of N 43. 1~3 df T ~w 1/4 of NW 114 ~ 0 T p lst 11t1 Bk. :.._0542-9046 T T. D. Hamilton , S- 71 -7 P-rne-s_ S 30 rds o.f. N 43 -/3 rds of 0 W 60 rds of SW 1/4 Qf-NW 1/, T exc S290 ft of_ jd 43Q__Lt. 0 T p W. L. Dummier ' 10542-9013 T Ray L. Wyatt N. 2310 Pines N 150 ft of S1SL 2/3 rd,s of 0 vV 60 r d s o f SW lf 4 o f T UW 1/4 0 T 0 T (Continued on next page) DAIL b r- 0. 1917 ZE-11-77 Spokane County Planning Cotnmissio,i County Court House Spokane, vvashinaton 9S201 uentlemen uvc, the undersigned property owners, reque st tne Spokane County Planning Commission (to coi-isider a zoning pla,i) or (to consider chanying the 2,oning map) from 'L'WO FAMT_I,Y RESIDENTIAL (R-2) to RESIDENTIAL OFFICE on the followiii~, described property Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 of Stoneridge Subdivision Section 9, Township 25 N, Range 44, E W M, Spokane County, WA IN ALAI L . ADDRaSS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Fidelity ~ 1Jack D Tiegen 3-1-30411-02 Lot 1, Bk 9 Lst Bk Mtg Z~T'3,lliam Odom K P 17588-SW Lot 2, Bk 9 Ytdelit over~a~, Inc 3-1-26548-7 Lot 3, Bk 9 Sherwood & Robertis 4 G. A Deishal 2420000 Lot 4, Bk 9 Sherwood Rober~s 2420000 Lot 5, Bk 9 5 K. L. Henaerson, r , 6 Ray lrJones L-303-5-000037 Lot 6, Bk 9 ~~oan ~r &av~.s L-303-5-000010 Lot 7, Bk 9 ~{N ~ Rainier Mtg 8 B. A. Compton L-303-5-000006 Lot 8, Bk 9 Rainier Mtg ~ g J W Spooner L-303-5-000042 Lot 9, Bk 9 l~ Rainier Mtg 10 S. L. Tennant 303-5-000044 Lot 10, Bk 9 11 D. P LaVign.e N 4408 Madison Lot 10, Bk 10 Bancshares 12 Marvin E. Ni cy 15-01570 Lot 1, Bk 14 Security Pacific 13} James E Poole 191757 Lot 2, Bk 14 Rainier Mtg 14 C~M. Carro~.1 L-303-5-000031 Lot 1, Bk 15 ~ Rainier Mtg ~ 15 D. Sloo7~ey~ L-303-5-000025 Lot 2, Bk 15 ~ R-a 1 /Pee 1"4~ 'Yr7 'A : J SqnchUrit 146-5-808026 Lot 3, Bk 15 1 ~ A. ~ I ~ ainie JRames ~i ~gye ~ L-303-5-000017 ` Lot 4, Bk 15 c l ► - R?vwngouresg L-803394-6-SP-3 Lot 5, Bk 15 ~ Wolffl i S 717 Pines i Lots 1,2,3, Bk 1 ~ GYommu i a ngs ~ ~ V W Ru e 55000575 Lot 1, Bk 2 ~ ` oGe toc o k ~ E 13014 Sprague jl Lot 2, Bk 2 po cane y . 55000560 ~ Lot 3, Bk 2 ~ i re, ew d f ;I Lot 4, Bk 2 A ~4~ Zle Wm R S 717 Pines Lot 5, Bk 2 ~ A~ ~ Lot 6, Bk 2 AlLvin` ezw wo ~ rz S 717 Pines I Lots 1,2, B 3 ~ ~ar ~ r S 717 Pines I Lot 3, Bk 3 d Na ion 1 Mt t~g~ o{~ r 0,FNMA-1-46-780643-7 , Tr 15,16,17,18,19 Ed~~ ~'I,,D ' t ! S 26 2/3 Rds of W ~ Edna M Dutton W 1723 Mansfield , 60 rds of NW 4 etc + EiBcoj[~.tual S290 ft of W 450 ft ~ i • ~ 6-1-2567-0 , of S 3 rds of etc I§V24 1 S 717 Pines S 3~ rds 4 3 1/3 ~ L W a~t j N 2310 Pines _ rds etc W N150 ft of S 36 2/3 ~ i rds of etc I t ' ~ s i f I ~ i ' I ~ I r - 06 i L ~ h f7.~ ~ ~ V ~ .9AGi January 4, 1977 ALIf"mP f ~ Lp RE A!s. Mr vinae Seipp Wolfland, Inc. S 717 Pi.ries Rd Spokane, TnTashington 99216 Zb whan it may vomcern As awmer of Lat 3, BloGk 2, of Strmeridge Sub Divisian, I believe the vorrect usage of the three (3) lots franting Pin,es Road i.n Block 1 of StanerLdge Suib Division should be zcned far residential. office usage Sin,oPxely, f ~ PatriCk T Dowtley PTD/dd ~ ~ ~ ' You are h~reby notified, that on at the hour of ~f said day in ~onferen~e Room A, ~Mlal~vn Avenu~e En- tranCe, Spokan~ County Court House Annex, Spokane, Washington, The SP~KANE C~UNTY PLANNING ~~N~M15- SIC3N wi~l condut# a public hearing to ~c~~Ntl~~ ~AP ~'R~~~ T'~'G-~~'11~~I►Y ~~~x~l~~~I~IL ~R-~~ RE~~~E~ITt~L C~F~"t~'~ ~~~~~I~~'~~ BP~~s~~R~D ~Y ~'C~~~~A~r~3, ~~iC. , 7l~ pI~~B Ra11t~, ~~'G~AN~~', ~~I~~i~NC~`~tr', ~`~a PRGP~~~~ P~G~`~BBxC~~~1~ G~FF~~~B. 4N PI~t~~B~!?Y I~~~CR~B~~ ~~L~3V~ . Gen+eral description o~ area: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . S~'C~~~RI~~~ ~ti~~iY~Bxt~}1~, ~~C~tt~~ T4V~' ~~~I~ R~ ~V.., R~1~ii~~ ~.~b ~~Qi~Jl~ti~ CU'~~~'Y~ '~A$~i~G'~t~h {~eat ~ide o! Pin~a I~+~ad, aop~h ~f ~ler~~t~~ Avr~nua~ F~R FURTHER DETA~LS contatt the 5pokan~ Count Y Planning C~rmmissian, Publi~ Wvrks Buildin ~1. $11 Jeffer- g~ son Street, Spokane, Wash~ngton. Dir~+~to~r of Pl~nning Spokaea County ~lanning Commission F4RM 8~6 PLNG. CQMFR. 9•6S ~ ' •r ~ t, r,. ~M1,•~,,~ r . <w..± • n ~ . i~ , • . ~y ~ aw/ t ; . , I q ~ • . . . ,~„~y~.: • . ' . . , ~.r,. ."y' w• ~ • ) = . - . • ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ` • _ . _ = - j y:,"~_~ . ,jZs~~~j~E7f~r~"~F'~"~`-,.;~~M 'p"r. ~-~I. w • "x~' a~i • ~ ~ ~ •r. ~ . ".1( . . ~,`.~.'~~+i~'_r~ , ~~I'.~ y.~ ~Q ' J. ~ .S 4'~~ " tTr:rf • - y'.R~ ~P' - £6~yr"s 'T i1 . V ~ . . ' _ _ ' r ~S"„ 1 ~ ~t r ~ ~ ~ - ~.1 . . . i ; C !a ~ i . , r~: • J _ ~r 'r';~.' . ~ ! ' «~~T' • + _ A.'q. k{ 4. _ . ..ir, . . 1 j~ • _ ~~•#-'ot~s ~I ! a ~ ~ If \ ~f '14 ,.h. ~ ~ iali N~ lS ~AAjL 1 ~ i"'a#.• ' ~ • ' ~ ~ Y K I ~ . 1' " Z ~ ia ' ' + . 4~ n ' ~ ~1~d~. ! vr , ~ • 'tti ~ ,,r "`~~r'~ • l ~ ~ :I: Y. ~ ' ' ~ }~n~~ • ~ - r~ « ~ ~ , F ~ ~ • ` . . . . , ~ , , . . ~ • . . . . ~ . . ~ , ' . . ~ . . . . , . _ ~w,~~ k ~ y Wt: . . . 'r 'i . _ ' ~y~~ . ~ ~ ~ y~ . ~ ~ " . : • . . . . , 'y }~1'~ .~-~~:I~Fi,~...;..r~ ~,r~ . ~,r . . ~ ' i ~~.=-i rA' r, i'. 1• • ' _ . . ~ _ ~ , . , A,,~ • ` ~ ` 1µ- 1 ,k r . ~ : jNl't?t~l_. Ma~t"~'~~a. S~, ~.,,Y~*~4.}; . ' . • . ~ * R•, I v ~ ~ pZiyy ~ i ~y S t,`,..,,,,.. . . . ' . . . _~~"~►a, . ~ . . TT • • . , , . ~1, a,~:' . . . ' ' • . ' ' . . . ~ . . ' ~ . . . " , , . Vy~ ~ . . .f . . . . . . . . . , . ' . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . • . . . +~iMi,w ~ . . . _ . ~ ,.Yi\, ~ y. ~t:~,.'' ~ ~ ` ~ r ` ~ • • . ~ . , . I~ ' s ,1 'v ~ ~ tM~ .r ~ + ' ~ r ~ ~ , . . 't, i. t~ • ' ~ ~ w ~ ~ 4~w~~'.~ ~v~ or~t ~~r, r~~s♦ "W'~ .t +'Mh~tita.~~r~" i~~ ~ ~ ~ t' ie .~'S~ ti~ R~•. ~v~''y,."~ ~ 1~,~~~.,.; ~Y .i.,t i.l'~~~~,y~~ ( rrn~.,'j, y},qt.~,~~s~ ,~s y~:►•. ~ h ~ l.i ~ -a'~.~ .t'~.~ ~ I'w.r, f' T ~d.' •'V~'.. i~4~,'~"Y. ~~A'~~~~jv"1',r'~. .,J~.',t,f ~.~..T'~~j~~},. H,,St~~ )~i~~!~t~~~j`•,~~',b ~i,. ~~f' ~ .tr ti!~~ ~'~.~~~t..iR` ~ ~a ~I1~ £ e ~ ~ l ~ ,'l.~• ~ '.x r ./~,~~^1~1y1C`-~~~ ~ fy f ~ ~ 1'~ ~.•J. ~w ~i't.. ~i~~,.~ ~ 7h~J-A~~`J~~ ..2 ?,i.ti ~7 y:t;~ ,w'~y :1'~ 1'~'M~.,~ :'y.~T tr* i t,4:~~N ,,M1`~4'j~.~ 4S; ~ ~~~r.. '•{~1~K~1~:r~,~.~ r~ a•+~i'ti~'It~ ~;r`~; ;A ;~+~•a~~~ 4i 'r;r}~F e,"~' ~ 7M'••y i'~': .j~~t,.;1~4..,.,~,~'+~ d Y.,~"~ ~ ~J ~ '.~i ~i1't,~_~R ~~'i;p _ - '2r1,y~~1{'+✓'1 +i ~a {`llsf f 1 ~i''yU,~~" ' i~' "~f ~ , 1~.~~{ y,~ n~al~ ..l ~ .t.0~' ~~Rti* ~~t~~~u~,~* ~411•~ ti ~ -Z,~:~ ~ .,~n~i r r + .~i'^~'y;~~ t ~'~b~ ~~1~ ,C ~T y~ ~'t 'y~.,~, ,,1:''~ ~,~~:M ,1r ..t,.r4 y,!i~{~S ~.•~r~. •~+r¢•t~3~V ~.'.f 1.1~'~a" } ~ i~~C~Y~ ~ i~,~ttA, t~l' ~.{w~li ~ 'yk~lne~*v~ M (,i~ r ~~k r ,~,'~j~ ~ t ~.3 r H-.~ , 4... ~F ~ ''R 'f 1~I,Yy •f'~ ~ ^r` , ~~►ri Z ~ ~ ~ M~ . ~_f~'l~ ~ ' ~ii,~ Y , ~ ~ ~f~'~t'~.~T u,•r~ .t~ ~ . r 1y ' K~?rr~•~''~1,1tP'Cr~' ~'`I~t;~1~~~~~ ~"~'i"'`1~~~~~~•, .~~y.~~, '1'~±,3'`~. ~~.~~s1t^t~~~7~~~~,~„ V+ ~ fr a ..'~':~~~'~w y1~~„,5~' ti~~~~~'iiA , f t '~~1~~T"~`~.~~A -qr~ • ~ ~~**i ~o~.~ • ~ ~ t'` L a . _ ~ ~ - " _ . ~ ~ ~r ~~.~~'f. ~ . ~ , ~ ' ~ • ~ ~ zr ~ y.. ZrMaid". ..r . ~ " ; . ~ ~ - ` . • r - . c. . • . _ ~ Y..:. i+ .;~;'r t -!~f+ . , , • ~ 11 . . ~ _ . . , . ~ • ~ jt' . ..1~ .e ' tr ' ' , . + • r , ; - - . ~ ~ . ' r ♦ i t~ . , . . ~ "ir' F 1i . ~1 ~ 4+ i -t ~ . , i 1 ~~4 . ~„p ; ~ . • _ q~ ~ Y ♦ t ' 4 • 4 - J ~ ~ - . + _ i''~ ~r, ~ a~F~ ~~-~i ~'~--i~ ~ *~r~~ ~ a~iq- 4 ~ ~ ~ ,~~s: ~t J~t' t~. -1 ` ~M. ~ ~t.. ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ r- ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ J Y - ~r~A ' { ~ ~E i~ 4~' • . • ~ " R~ ~ ~ ~~y t~;~ i 4)~ , 1 ~`r R . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i - ~,^1~~. ~ . ` ~ t~~ ~ , AO . . . .r ~ y . ~r ' ~ '~k~ r~' r ~ { ~ _ ~M . . 'ai ~ - ~ -F• : ;t• ~ ` ' ( ~t 'F'~,~~ t. . ~ '~F ; ~ ~ ~.h ~ . F • . i ! ♦ . ~ . d _ ~ t$ . . ~ . , ~ . , . . ~i~ . , . . _ ; . . . . . ~ . . - . . . ~ ~ _ . _ _ Siy iz_~ ' i ~ ~ ia; • ~n.;w^.. ' _ T` i. ,.1`-'~~ ~~F• . 1 { 4 + ,~..~II~► ► , t,t`°"'1~' . • • ti - , ..yFawprt . . . . +i • . ' 1~ ~~~`~~~~~+~,-f S r 1~. . t , ~,~~j_ ~i'i 1 L „ ,~~"~''i,l~~.. ~p ' y'~. 7 ~ " ~ . r ~i !~''Y^.'~ s i 14 1 £ t, N, 'Y , ` ' . ~rti{ ~i'11 ~ ~ ~i f",~t ~~}{a~' .whr' 1 r `4M ~1~ ~ r •kt 1\ .r jya S.F' r ..r.~y~~ r. ~ i . . . r . n^ ~ . { y A~ ~ t I ~ ~Y-r 71 1 ..T . ~ . ~ t ,V, i ~ ' pi,'~ ' ♦+t II~C 4 ^ ' . . ~ S ' Y "1~ • , y,1 1 w; ~ - 'i ~ 1.,,it ~~*i• ~ ~~~.s'~ ^+r, 1'~ ~ ♦ r . s * , • , . . • r♦ 1~ ~ ~ y~w'. ~ ~ "`H~F u ,t• .,4,~4 "~+'~'+~i' ~ . .t t~* y ' ~ "_~•'r~~• ~.i lit r 1 ~ •i _ .~t ~L•'l'~ ~ Y . ' y Y ~ Y R x. ~ ~ y~ ~r ~~1. ~ k r c • ~ , ~ { ~t Th : A ~ t s' ' ,t • . ' . '~'1 'Y ' ~ ' .~t i ~~g' ~ X^S ~Q..t ~,.,>.~~~:Y~{v ~ y } l ~ + '',y .~F ~ r.~~r;'~~~~~r~~.• ~r~?~' i :1~+~~X ~~r .~'~1/~rM ~ .r~~~ t.f<. '~~~~t~ , .t' `},~.t~ ~~,~.~1~~ ~.li;_.w~.rt ~ ~ ~~1} f ~c ~ ! s ' •y ~ t ' : ~,s~~~v 4~~ w ~ 71~ . ~ ~ . 1.~ i M . f. i ~ . `;,~a. 1 ` r~ C~ •ml {~r . .`R.p ~R'1,~ ~ ^''r~ ~'~~4.;~4 1. ~ ,t~,~ ,..t ~ ~,`,1~ '},a 1 ~L ~t,N• nw~:,~..'+ ~ •,~~~~3~•:~M• w. ~~A~ ~~'4Y~~S"r ~t' '-t' r:lw~ 1 . . rl~, w+'p~ . ~1~ .'.r~,.,.Yw~yY+;: : ~ • ~i''~~'S'~~~ +F`~ ~ ~ ~ ' , i, ~ , f . , M, I ~ t ~r ar '''j~t~~, y , 4 . ~~.t~ .i x•s r~v w~~\y~- •Yi1t•~d ~~~~~~"4 7t. '~\.'~y;,~~~ j~ V~~ ~ ~'''.i~ti ~~J~ ~ 1~{~ ~~.•1t,,~~F~~",,t~' t•` ~i~~.~~~t~ ~~~~~F ~~s~,~!y~ ,,~~f~, t\ ,y 1~5• •,~y, ~1 jk.. .'yc'~~5~ ~ '1 j i "`f } ~,Q ~ y~~ i'. Y,4- 1 'r , ;!i j t~,~ y I~ la~ • + ~ r ~.1ll.~P ~ ° ~ ~ ~ P i (d ,'~:1j1~ , c.~4:y~ •'~3~ f•..y ~ ~1„Ji h~..•~ ~~j~;f~. ~ M}[~ 1~' ~~~~~3• t ~~ft.~.~ ~;l . '1~~,~~.~~~ ~tl ~ k 1 fqs~ { x R ~ V,J' ( ~ ~1~~'i ~ j 4 . . ' i'S~. s ~~~6. ~ e ,~i4 t; ,-,n ti ~ " ~ J•` ~~2 ~ - ' ~L~►,~~ t ~ - d}~f 1 ~ ,k 1 y1~ • ~ 4~~ ~ * ~ ~ tfk, i' } -t y ~,;t~~~~ '~~k~'k~ ~4i ~ ~ . 1. a ~ y:. i » ° ~ , ~ ~ ' k r~y~~j k,~ ~ ~ ~ '1~, ' ; K ~ }q~~ R • ~ +~t ~w ~ ~~1.~ » ~~'1R1~ !,s. • a , tj,`~ ~T~- z ~ ''y +~,~,",f~ ~ , ~ 1~ v ~~'~,0 `x •M ~e r ' 1 1e u+, i ' , r . 5~'.• ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~y. t,i1 h,.,~ t Y¢, ;~;1{ ~l > ~.~+~i~ 1,;,y'r~ ~t ~~k~•.~ .t i. * , y t ~ h t ~ i t ~ ~Lt ~ A • ~ ~43~~ ~ ~ 'i' ~k~'~` ' y ~ .t„ t A ~ ? 4 ; + a C ~ ~11~t 1s ,s 4~', ' `~+p ~~~.~g ~ , ~ i ~ ~y, f 1+ dt y~ ` b`A It' ~,iF .t~ r ~ ~t~~'-~•v ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~~•y . ■I~~r , ~ti.~►!~*i~s~►~ ~ _ . `~1 _ ~ ,~~~4, . 11►~i:.r~~~ _ . ~ olfland (o. Residentiaf Developer - General Contracto~ May 21 , 198~:~ C. ~ ~ Steve florobiowski rA AY 2 2 19:?5 Zoning Administrator SFOKANE CCLt°.l; Y Spokane County Plannina Dept. PLANNING nEPA9 t PJ. 721 Jeffers nn Spokane, Wash. RE: Sunburn Arms 20 Unit Project N. Pines at Marietta Dear Steve: This letter and attached revised landscaping plan will confirm our conversation concerning landscaping the 4Jest portion of our property where we adjoin 3 duplex lots. I have taken thee as-built drawing and noted the area of concern which is the So. West corner of the property, We will put a minimum of 8 Pyramid Arborvitae and 14 Juniper Tams in a bark bed in the area designated. Steve, you have my assurance that this work will be satisfactorily completed on or before June 21, 1985. The contractor, Aspen Landscaping, has assured me he will have it done much before that date. The fence is up now. Steve, would you kindly contact Reed Ockey of the Building Inspectors Department and tell him to release our Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you for your excellent cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, l'► " Q~L'AND CO ~G y ~ lson GWN/sh Enc. S. 717 Pines Rd. • Spokane, Washington 99206 •(509) 928-2592