CUE-11-00
. ~9-
SPOKANE COUNTX HEARING EXAMINER
RE: Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry, )
in the Urban Residential-3.5 (LTR-3.5) zone; ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Applicant: Sanford H. Riggs ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
File No. CUE-11-00 ) AND DECISION
1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Application for a conditional use permit for a home industry in the Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, to allow telephone and computer marketing of electronic products
to manufacturers.
Decision: Denied.
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the conditional use permit application and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the followmg Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and
Decision:
II. BACKGROUND/FTNDINGS OF FACT
A. Generallnformation:
Applicant: Sanford H. Riggs, 7810 South Pineview Lane, Spokane, WA 99206
Owner: Barbara Jo Richards, 2611 South Harrison, Kennewick, WA 99338
Site Address: 13724 and 13726 East Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA
Site Location: Generally located along the south side of Mission Avenue, approximately 220
feet west of Evergreen Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, WA
Legal Description: County Assessor's tax parcel no. 45151.0814
Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (LTR-3.5). T'he site is located inside the Aquifer Sensitive Area
(ASA) Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the County Zoning Code.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban category. The subject property is also within the ASA, the
Priority Sewer Service Area, and the Urban Impact Area designated by the Comprehensive Plan.
IUGA: The site is located inside the interim urban growth area boundaries designated by
the County pursuant to the State Growth Management.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-11-00 Page 1
. Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the
Division of Planning on September 1, 2000.
Site Description: The site is approximately 15,000 square feet in size and flat. The site is
developed with a 2-story duplex constructed in 1975, with attached garages and gravel driveways
for each duplex, and an on-site sewage system. The site is landscaped with residential style
landscaping, with grassed front and rear yards. The applicant is in the process of purchasing the
site from its current owner.
Area Road System: Evergreen Road, Broadway Avenue and Sullivan Road in the area are
designated as Principal Arterials by the County Arterial Road Plan. Mission Avenue adjacent to
the site, and McDonald Road to the west, are designated as Minor Arterials. Pines Road (SR-27)
to the west, and Sullivan Road to the east, comprise major traffic and commercial comdors
through the Spokane Valley area of the county. The County is currently widening Evergreen
Road, south of Mission Road, from a 2-lane road, without curb or sidewalk, to a 5-lane Principal
Arterial Road Section, with curb and sidewalk along both sides of the street.
The Interstate 90 freeway is located approximately 750 feet over an embankment from the site,
running from east to west through the Valley area. A new freeway interchange at Evergreen Road
and I-90 is currently being constructed by the Washington State Department of Transportation.
Evergreen Road is being constructed to pass under Mission Avenue, a short distance east of its
existing intersection with Mission Avenue, as part of the interchange project. The interchange
project will provide on and off-ramps for freeway access, and an overpass over I-90 that will extend
Evergreen Road to Indiana Avenue on the north side of I-90. Mamer Road, a Local Access road
located a short distance west of the site, extends north from Mission Avenue down an embankment
to Nora Road, which is a frontage road extending along the south side of I-90.
Surrounding conditions: The land in the area is designated in the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The land lying north of the site across Mission Avenue is zoned UR-3.5
and is undeveloped, likely due to the severity of the slope north of Mission. Light Industrial (I-2)
zoning is located along the south side of I-90, east of Mamer Road. The Spokane Valley mall
and other retail uses have recently been developed north of I-90, between I-90 and Indiana
Avenue, between Evergreen Road extended north and Sullivan Road to the east. Additional
retail development is planned in the vicinity of such development, north of I-90.
The land lying west of the site is zoned UR-3.5, and is developed with duplexes along
Mission Avenue. Several Urban Residential-22 ([JR-22) and Urban Residential-12 (UR-12)
zones are found west of such uses, along Mission Avenue and/or Blake Road, improved with
multi-family housing, and some medical or professional offices. Valley General Hospital and
numerous medical offices in UR-22 zones are found further to the west, between Pines Road and
McDonald Road, along or south of Mission Avenue. A number of such UR-12 and UR-22 zones
were approved during the 1990s.
The land lying south of the site is zoned UR-3.5 and developed with single-family homes
and duplexes. Approximately 1,000 feet south/southeast of the site is a large UR-22 zone,
fronting along the west side of Evergreen Road, developed with a retirement center. The Hearing
Examiner recently rezoned land located directly south of the retirement center to the UR-22 zone,
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-11-00 Page 2
. •
to allow expansion of the retirement center. See Hearing Examiner decision in File No. ZE-26-
98.
A Neighborhood Business (B-1) zone is found approximately 1,960 feet south of the site, at
the northwest corner of the intersection of Evergreen Road and Broadway Avenue, which site is
currently being remodeled for a service station and/or convenience store. The Hearing Examiner
recently approved a rezone of approximately 5 acres of land located along the north side of
Broadway Avenue, east of Blake Road, for the development of 110 multi-family dwelling units for
elderly/retirement apartments. See Hearing Examiner decision in File No. ZE-23-98.
~ Project Description: The application requests approval of a conditional use permit for a
home industry, to allow one side of the duplex (E. 13724 Mission Avenue) on the property to
be used for the marketing of electronic products to manufacturers, with all ordering done by
telephone or computer, by the applicant and one outside employee. All products would be
shipped directly to customers from the applicant's suppliers, and no wholesale shippers or
customers will visit the site. The applicant and the outside employee will not reside in the
duplex. The other side of the duplex (E. 13726 Mission) not used for the business would
continue to be leased out to residential tenants. The applicant previously operated the
business out of his home, located several miles south of the site.
B. ProceduralInformation:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4), and Zoning
Code Chapter 14.404
Hearing Date and Location: September 20, 2000, Spokane County Public Works
Building, Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: September 5, 2000
Published: September 8, 2000
Site Visit: September 19, 2000
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294
Testimony:
Jim Falk Sandy Riggs
Division of Current Planning 7810 South Pineview Lane
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99206
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, County Zoning Code, County Code,
County Arterial Road Plan maps, 1996 Update to CWMP, and County zoning maps. County
Resolution Nos. 99-0265 (revising Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, 97-0874
(revising interim regulations for County IUGAs), 97-0321 (adopting interim regulations for
County IUGAs), 96-0585 (adopting 1996 Update to CWMP), 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules
of Procedure), and 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance).
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CLJE-11-00 Page 3
III. LAND USE ANALYSIS
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. Apnroval criteria
The Hearing Examiner Ordinance authorizes the Heanng Examiner to grant, deny or grant
with such conditions, modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to make a
conditional use permit application compatible with the Spokane County Generalized
Comprehensive Plan and applicable development regulations. See County Resolution No.
96-0171, Attaclunent "A", paragraphs 7(d) and section 11. Development regulations include,
without limitation, the County Zoning Code, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the
County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11.10, Spokane County Code).
To be approved, the conditional use permit must comply with the criteria set forth in the
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone for a home industry, the development standards of the UR-3.5
zone, the gcneral requirements for conditional uses contained in Zoning Code 14.404.100 et seq,
and other applicable development regulations. Zoning Code 14.404.101 authorizes denial of a
conditional use pennit where it cannot be shown that the requested use will be compatible with
other permitted uses in the zone involved...", and authorizes the Hearing Examiner to impose
conditions on development of a conditional use to ensure the permit's compatibility with other
permitted uses in the zone.
Zoning Code 14.404.102 (1) sets forth various conditions and restrictions that may be
imposed on issuance of a conditional use permit. This includes control of use; special or
enhanced standards of development; control of noise, glare, and other environmental effects;
control of operating hours; limitations on duration or time of use; and [a]ny other reasonable
restrictions, conditions or safeguards that will uphold the spirit and intent of the [Zoning] Code
and the Comprehensive Plan and mitigate any adverse impact upon the adjacent property by
reason of use, extension, construction, or alteration allowed."
A comprehensive plan is considered as a general blueprint for land use regulation. See
Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount Vernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 873 (1997); and Cathcart v.
Snohomish County, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981). Where a comprehensive plan conflicts with
zoning regulations, the zoning regulations will usually be construed to prevail. See Weyerhaeuser
v. Pierce County, 124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994). This is particularly the case with regard to the approval
of conditional use permits. See Hansen v. Chelan County, 81 Wn. App 133, 138 (1996); and Pease
Hill v. County of Spokane County, 62 Wn. App. 800, 808-809 (1991).
County Zoning Code 14.100.104 provides that the Zoning Code shall be interpreted to
carry out and implement the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the general plans
for physical development adopted by the Boaxd of County Commissioners. Zoning Code
14.100.106 indicates that when the provisions of the Zoning Code conflict with the
Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted plans and development regulations, the more restrictive
provisions shall govem to the extent legally permissible and the Zoning Code provisions will be
met as a minimum.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CLTE-11-00 Page 4
. The Comprehensive Plan states that the decision guidelines set forth in the Plan should be
used as a reference source and guide for making land use decisions. Comprehensive Plan, p. 2.
B. The proposed conditional use permit for a home industry, as conditioned, does not meet the
criteria for a home industry in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone.
1. Applicable Comprehensive Plan policies
The proposal is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban
category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the opportunity for a"citylike"
environment, including a variety of land uses served by a high level of public facilities and
services. It is primarily a residential category of single-family, two-family, multifamily and
condominium buildings, along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, public and
recreational facilities. The Urban category recommends a residential net density range of 1 to 17
dwelling units per acre. Comprehensive Plan, Section 1.
The Urban category states that the more intensive uses such as light industrial and
neighborhood commercial should be located near the heavily traveled streets, with the less
intensive uses such as residential isolated from the noise and traffic.
The Urban category does not directly address a"home industry" use. The Urban category
does contemplate "home occupations", which are similar to the "home profession" use that is
permitted in various zones by the County Zoning Code, through administrative action by the
County Division of Planning. The Urban category recommends that before home occupations
are approved in an existing residential area, it should be determined that they do not disrupt
residential amenities concerning sight, sound, smell and similar factors; create traffic which
exceeds road design or which develops traffic hazards within the neighborhood; or negatively
impact the intended uses within such category. Urban category, Objective l.l.i and Decision
Guideline 1.1.7.
Urban category uses should be served by a high level of public services, including public
sewer or interim sewage disposal systems that protect water quality. Decision Guidelines 1.1.2
and 1.3.3. A variety and mix of residential uses and densities are recommended in such category.
Decision Guideline 1.1.4. Residential areas are discouraged in high noise areas. Objective 1.5.d
and Decision Guideline 1.5.6.
The Urban category recommends that new residential development be buffered from
existing adj acent uses where adverse effects may develop, through use of spatial separation,
distance, screening, landscaping or other performance standards. Decision Guideline 1.5.1.
Structure height and the architectural character of new development in relation to nearby
structures in the neighborhood are to be considered before approving such development.
Decision Guideline 1.5.8. Land use proposals should be consistent with adopted County and
service district utility plans, policies and regulations, and resolve adverse effects on public
infrastructure. Decision Guideline 1.6.1.
The Transportation section of the Comprehensive Plan contains the Arterial Road Plan and
policies applicable to development along county roads. The Arterial Road Plan describes the
various classes of County arterials and their functions, and considers all other county roads as
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CLJE-11-00 Page 5
t Local Access roads. The Arterial Road Plan maps designate arterials in the urbanizing areas of
the county as Principal Arterials, Minor Arterials or Collector Arterials, in descending order of
importance. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 21.
Decision Guideline 21.5.11 encourages pedestrian facilrties to enhance the safety a»d
convenience of pedestrian travel and to provide access to neighborhood facilities. Decision
Guideline 21.1.5 indicates that sidewalks should at a minimum be provided along all arterial
roads and all local access roads which lead to schools, parks and shopping districts The
Transportation section states that proposed development may be required to dedicate needed
right of way, or to widen, or assisi in widening, existing transportation facilities; all in
accordance with established road design critena and official maps. Decision Guideline 21.1.7.
Decision Guideline 23.1.2 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends thafi sewer facility
planning and development be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in regard to size, location
and timing. Decision Guideline 23.1.3 indicates that capital improvement plans for sEwer
facilities should be used as an implementation tool for the Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan. The more restrictive of the policies in the CWMP and Comprehensive Plan
are to be applied by public agencies using such policies. See County Resolution No. 96-0585.
In 1996, the County adopted an update to the County Comprehensive Wastewater
Management Plan (1996 CWNiP Update), which is incorporated by reference into the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan adopted by the County. The 1996 CWMP Update designates 6-
year and 15-year capital improvement areas where the County plans to extend public sewer
service. The current site is located inside a 15-year sewer program area. See County Resolution
No. 96-0585, adopiing CWMP 1996 Update, p. 2-8, 2-10 and Exhibit 4-2.
2. Consistencv of home industry wrth aoproval critena
The proposal is zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), a zone which implements the
Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. Zoning Code 14.616.100 states as follows:
The purpose of the UR-3. S zone is to implement the lower density range of
the Urban category o,f'the Comprehensive Plan. The intent o.f'the zone is
to promote areas of primarily single family residential use in an urbanized
neighborhood setting, having a high level of public services. Lots shall be
served by a public water system and shall require connection to a public
central sewer system when avatlable. Roadways shall be paved and
curbed and may have sidewatks.
The UR-3.5 zone does allow a"home industry" as a conditional use, provided it meets the
standards set forth in Section 14.616.240 (4) of the Zoning Code and other applicable
requirements. Section 14.300.100 of the County Zoning Code defines a"home industry" as
follows:
An occupation, profession, or craft, excluding an adult bookstore or adult
entertainment establishment, in association with a primary residence,
which is o. f'such intensity or broad scope of operation that public hearing
review, as a Conditional Use Permit, is necessary. Therefore, by
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-11-00 Page 6
character and definition, a home industry is different than a home
profession or general commercial, tndustrial antl business uses.
A"home profession" is permitted as an accessory use in the UR-3.5 zone, provided that a
home profession permit is obtained. Zoning Code 14.616.220. A home profession is a more
limited use than a home industry use; and must be carried on entirely within a residence by the
occupants of such residence, be clearly incidental to the use of the residence as a dwelling,
cannot change the residential character of the dwelling or neighborhood, and be conducted
without giving the outward appearance of a business. See Zoning Code 14.300.100, definition of
"home profession".
The project is served by a high level of public services, is located in an area where public
facilities have already been established, and lies within the interim urban growth area (ILJGA)
designated by the County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act.
The duplex on the site is currently served by an on-site sewage system. County Resolution
No. 97-0874 prohibits the approval of a conditional use permit within the County's designated
Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) boundaries, unless the proposal can demonstrate the
availability of public sewer and water, or is located within the 15-year sewer capital program
area designated by the 1996 Update to the County Comprehensive Wastewater Management
Plan. The site is located within the 15-year sewer program area, and therefore complies with
County Resolution No. 97-0874.
The approval criteria for a home industry in the UR-3.5 zone requires that the home
industry be carried on in a primary residence or in accessory, detached structures which do not
exceed twice the gross floor area of the primary residence. Only members of the family residing
on the premises, and no.more than 2 employees outside of the family, may be engaged in the
home industry. Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4).
Zoning Code 14.300.100 defines "family" as an individual or two or more persons
related by blood, marriage, or adoption, or a group of not more than five (5) persons, excluding
dependents, who are not related by blood, marriage or adoption, living together as a single
nonprofit housekeeping unit in a dwelling unit." A"residence" is defined as a"... building or
structure, or portion thereof, which is designed for and used to provide a place of abode for
human beings, but not including hotels or motel units, or places of abode having no kitchen
within each unit. A residence must include one or more dwelling units."
A"dwelling" is defined as a"... building or part thereof designed exclusively for residential
purposes on a permanent basis as distinguished from a transient basis and which therefore does
not include hotels, motels, dormitories, convalescent homes or accessory buildings or structures."
A"two-family dwelling (duplex)" is defined as a"... building designed exclusively for
occupancy by two (2) families living independently of each other within two (2) dwelling units."
Zoning Code 14.300.100.
The applicant, who is in the process of purchasing the property, indicated that the business
would be operated out of one side of the duplex on the current site, by the applicant and one
outside employee. The other side of the duplex would continue to be leased to residential
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-11-00 Page 7
tenants. Neither the applicant, nor his outside employee, have any intention of residing in the
two-family dwelling (duplex) located on the site.
The above discussion indicates that the use will not be camed on in a"primary residence",
since the side of the duplex where the business would be conducted will not be used primarily as
living quarters by its occupants for nonprofit reasons, and the residents leasing the other side of
the duplex will be residing in a separate dwelling unit, or residence, and are not involved in the
business. The application therefore fails to safiisfy Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4)(b).
In addition, no members of a family residing on the premises, or outside employee of such
family, will be engaged in the home industry. The residents leasing the other side of the duplex
reside in a separate dwelling unit, or residence, and are not involved in the business. The
application therefore fails to satisfy Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4)(c). Since the applicant is the
owner of the business, the applicant would have to reside on the premises to meet this criterion.
The property will be able to retain its exterior residential appearance, since no outward
changes will take place to the duplex or property, and the business will not result in increased
unpacts in terms of increased traffic, parlcing requirements, noise, etc. However, devotion of one
side of the duplex to strictly a business use jeopardizes the residential character of the site, in
contravention of Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4)(a). As discussed in the Staff Report on page 7, the
project fundamentally does not meet the concept of a"home industry".
The Staff Report found that the project did not meet Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4)(c), but
could meet the other criteria. The Examiner agrees that Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4)(c) is not
met, but also finds that Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4)(a) and (4)(b) are not met. The application
must satisfy each of the criteria specified in Zoning Code 14.616.240 (4) to be approved as a
conditional use permit for a home industry. The application must therefore be denied.
What the applicant proposes is a general commercial use. General commercial and
industrial uses are prohibited in the UR.3.5 zone. Zoning Code 14.616.230. The Zoning Code
also prohibits more than one primary use from being developed on the same property, such as a
commercial use and a residential use, unless otherwise permitted in the zone. Zoning Code
14.416.000.
Office uses are permitted in some of the higher density residential zones, i.e. the UR-12
zone and the UR.-22 zone. The site is too close (must be at a distance of at least 2,640 feet) to a
Neighborhood Business (13-1) zone located at the northwest corner of Broadway and Evergreen
Road to be rezoned to the B-1 zone. See Zoning Code 14.624.100.
The County is in the process of adopting a new comprehensive plan under the State Growth
Management Act, and a new zoning code to implement the new plan. The Examiner understands
that the area where the site is located is contemplated for "mixed use" development under the
most recent draft of the new comprehensive plan. Perhaps these new land use controls will
provide some relief for the applicant.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-11-00 Page 8
. . . IV. DECISION
Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the above application for
a conditional use permit for a home industry in the existing UR-3.5 zone, to allow a business
office in a duplex unit, is hereby denaed.
DATED this 27th day of October, 2000.
SPOKANE COUNTX HEARING EXAMINER
Michfiel C. Dempsey, WSBA 2 5
NOTICE OF FINA.L DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0171, the decision of the Hearing Examiner
on an application for a conditional use permit is final and conclusive unless within twenty-one (21)
calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing files a land use
petition in superior court pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW. Pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW, the
date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is mailed.
This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant, and by first class mail to other
parties of record, on October 27, 2000. The date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is
therefore October 30, 2000, counting to the next business day when the last day for mailing falls on
a weekend of holiday. THE LAST DAY FOR APPEAL OF THIS DECISION TO SUPERIOR
COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS NOVEMBER 20. 2000.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period
with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be inspected
Monday-Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.rri. and 5:00 p.m.
Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-11-00 Page 9
Activr ENGINEER'S "XIEW SHEET
f'n~~:tt Jtstus
i iuiit t~lans xL.^CIVCd Conditional Use Filc C jJE-0011-00 -'0
itn:uj Plans Appri,vcd Compsnion hlc;
tii.,.% I1o::Ii~tan.i~r~. ~-I~•'~~ Nlar~.
' Eti'IuLed F t Ie5
Hcar{ag: 09,'20:2000 lO:iU
1 ecnnica! ftrvie
f'reliminary Re~ ic•% ' 171 1 1 `Uf i_Ul ! Lli:j;.I tiqI1:1C1' 1 :Cf
().l•.l' Ri:l~:i~Ci: l;( . I(itlil N-_
Yroaect Namc 1-IOiNYE LNl)UtiTRI'NiARkFT EI,ECTRONIC PItULIUCTS TO MR;
::ite Address N. DTtUADWAY, W. L•V&RGRLEh. E. IN1:1MEk. S. MISSIUN. tit1SSlON E 13 7_-1
-lpplicant K'itl1~•Z:~wr,its;t-ti::r;:.~r, a1 - i 1'.11Z(~}~i.(til: i;~•~t ?~s~
!s1ntorJ Fi Riggs Conditiobs Muilcd: r~4~ i»
f70L?d ZOf1C N c,
7810 S. PinCVirw Ln tiVatcrS4usc~.- E, <<i)l
SP(1KANE. WA 992(k►- Sewer Sou; c
t'hunc Fax Schual Uiti~
15091928-69$3 (411019?R-p134 fire I)ist i
009)R91-1731 I'1o,lu :)i
ON nci
13urbara Ju Richni,
2r,l I S. Himsan t.
!.ti'`I'.'ii'K,
itwiiiinb f'h. 477-?075 E'lammne i'h J1N1 i'AL f:
Date Suhnutted Uescription lnicial.
[;ng Nrcaf 'i'echnica(iy Compictt Eng Ncul Hacvurd Rd tititigation
Nced Ihutnagc f'tuns Cng Nced Ttaffx: Annlysiy Ln~ Nc,: +0;hcr
i:nt Agrrre Aay Fecs Rcceiwd Eng rinal P1at recs Conzpletrcf
" l'opy :o Accuwitim~
!-:riK :~grcc f'riority I~ees lt,-ceivCd 06/1312(K1b En~; Arrhm Plat Fccs Completr~i
Notscc tQ E'ubiic r hutice to Puhlic ~ i 3 4 o c,orr,pletcd - ar Nccih- w be s~gned
I
~ .in quant~eT
drr►nage item calculattd
llranryg !)ale Lkcisian App [)cn Cund Applcl 1XV -
:\ppcalcd tu BCC 1)ecision 11pp tkn Cnnd Apptd Cm!ri '
Appcalyd te Court Lkcisian App t]en (`ond Appid •
, Stamped M~~1ars to Scctetary fSnndy►
Jt:Iisired 'llR 1 ot ('Iari~ io S«rrW!~r iS3r,1~: 1
i
1
. , 12rr=ry=iVED
• •t~ SEP 14 ZW0
l ~~lMWORT TO THE HEARING EXAMiNER
FILE CUE-11-00
III DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOKtV*4,E C0U1\-1Y
HEARING OATE: September 20, 2000 @ 10:30 a.m. FILE CUE-11-00
PROJECT PLANNER: Jim Falk, Associate Pianner ~
PROJECT OESCRIPTION: Application for a Conditional Use Permit for a home industry to allow
a business office in a duplex unit pursuant to Section 14.616.240(4) of the Spokane County
Zoning Code. The industry will be operated by 3 people using phones and computers to market
electronic products to manufacturers.
Project Data
Project Address and Location: The project site is located adjacent to and south
of Mission Avenue, at 13724 E. Mission Avenue,
Spokane, WA., about 300 feet west of the ~
intersection of Mission and Evergreen Roads, in
the northeast 1/4th of Section 15, Township 25,
Range 44, E.W.M.
Parcel Number: 45151.0814 '
Owner: Owner - Barbara Jo Richards,2611 S. Harrison
Kennewick, WA. 99338 509-783-0566
Applicant: Sandy Riggs, 7810 S. Pineview Lane, Spokane,
WA. 99206, 509-891-1733
Comprehensive Plan Urban (U)
Desi nation:
Zonin : Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
Existin Land Use: Duplex two family residential
Surroundin Zonin and Land Uses:
• North: Zoning to the north of the site is Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agricuttural (ZE-112-56). '
Land immediately north is undeveloped, likely
- due to the severity of the slope. Further north is
a Light Industrial (I-2) Zone (ZE-84-81
• South: Zoning to the south of the site is Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agricultural (ZE-112-56).
Land use to the south, southeast and southwest
consists of single family and duplex residential
uses and a retirement complex.
• East: Zoning to the east of the site is Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991,
previously classified as Agricultural (ZE-112-56).
CUE-11-00
Stafi Report - September 20, 2000 Hearing
1 of 7
• ~
~ T nd uses are duplex dwelling units. '
• West: Zoning to the east of the site is Urban
Residentiai-3.5 (UR-3.5) estabiished in 1991,
previously classified as Agricultural (ZE-112-56).
Land uses are duplex dwelling units.
Known Land Use Proposals and Land use actions recently approved in the
Recent Project Approvals in the vicinity of the proposal include the following:
Area of this Project:
ZE-7A-96/ZE-84C-81, is a change in conditions
to a previously approved zone rec(assification to
allow an increase in building square footage in a
5.7 acre Light Industrial (I-2) Zone created in the
early 1980s (ZE-84C-81) located north of project
site and in a UR-22 Zone further north and
adjacent to I-90; ZE-7-96, a 2.8 acre rezone
from UR-3.5 to UR-22 is located about 600 feet
north of the project site; ZE-26-98, a 2.8 acre
rezone from UR-3.5 to UR-22 located about 500
feet south of the project site on Evergreen
Street; SP-629-90, a short subdivision of land
into two .81 acre residential lots fronting on
Mamer Street located 300 feet southwest of the
project site; ZE-23-98, a rezone from UR-3.5 to
UR-22 fronting on Broadway Rd. about 2000
feet south of the project site; ZE-41-95, a 6 acre
rezone from UR-3.5 to UR-22 to accommodate
a retirement housing projec# (existing); ZE-41A-
95, an application to change the conditions of
approval of ZE-41-95 to delete certain building
height and density restrictions to be reviewed by
the Hearing Examiner in the near future; ZE-10- ~
99, an application to reclassify 1.99 acres from
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban
Residential-22 (UR-22) for the purpose of ;
developing a speculative professional office,
located west of and adjacent to Evergreen
Road, approximately 630 feet north of Broadway
Avenue. The public hearing on the application
was held August 30, 2000.
Land Division Status: The project site is an Assessor's segregation,
created in 1974. Since the parcel was created
before the effective date of the County
_ Subdivision Code and since the County has
- issued a building permit for development of a
- - duplex on the parcel, it is a legal parcel of record
not requiring a Certificate of Exemption.
a er urveyor: The project site is served by the Vera Irrigation
District # 15 public water system.
--Sewage 6'isposai: The existing duplex residence is served by an
on-site sewage disposal system.
-Fire is ric : Spokane County Fire Protection District # 1
provides fire protection to the site.
Nearest Arterial and Distance; Mission Avenue
CUE-11-40
Staff Report - September 20, 2000 Hearing
2 of 7
1 Neighborhood Association: ~ Noh-e identified
• This proposal is located inside of the interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA).
• The project site is located outsite the 1000 notification boundary of a Designated
Natural Resource Lands.
• The project site is located within the PTBA.
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject property is located within
the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA)
- and the Aquifer Sensitive Area-(ASA)
- Overlaw zone.
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation None il ustrated on the Spokane County I
Areas: Critical Areas Maps.
Floodplain: Not applicable
Geologically Hazardous Areas: None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps.
Wetlands: None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps.
- -
SEPA
A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on September 1, 2000 with a comment
period ending on September 18, 2000.
Noticinq
Published: The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman
Review on September 8, 2000.
Mailing Deadline: The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayers of land within
400 feet of the proposal was September 8, 2000.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted as Counter Complete: June 12, 2000
Determination of Completeness issued: August 4, 2000
Date Notice of Decision is Due: December 3, 2000
ReviewingAgencies
Eight (8) agencies were notified on June 23, 2000 and August 23, 2000. Agency comments were
due on July 10, 2000 and September 6, 2000.
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date
Received Received Received Received
Spokane County Yes 9J5/2000 Spokane County Fire No
Division of Engineering, ~ Protection District # 1
- Transportation
~ Spokane County Yes 8/3/2000 i Spokane Regional Yes 6/10/00
Division of Engineering, Heaith District
Development Services Spokane County No Spokane County Yes 8/25/2000
Division of Utilities Division of Building &
Code Enforcement
Spokane County No Vera Irrigation District No
Division of Utilities, # 15
Water Resources '
CUE-11-40
Staff Report - September 20, 2000 Hearing
3of7
. ~ Responses from the Public: No comments from the public have been received to date.
Description of the Site: The praject site is developed with a dupiex dwelling, to include attached
garages and associated driveways. The project site plan shows the sewage disposal drainfield is
located throughout most of the back yard. The site is flat and is landscaped with grass and
shrubs in a manner typical of residential lots in the area. The duplex has a grassed front and
back yard. Both duplex unfts are occupied. Access to the project site is gained from Mission
Avenue. The site fronts on Mission Avenue a distance of 100 feet. The duptex was constructed in
1981.
- Description of the Surroundin4 Neiqhborhood: The neighborhood is predominantly a duplex
dwel(ing area. A large, dated bam exists to the immediate south of the project site and seems to
be associated with a single family residence. There are single family homes, duplexes and a
retirement complex south, southeast and southwest of the project site. No agricultural activity I
appears to be occurring in the area. Duptex dwellings exist east and west of the project site. An
undeveloped triangular shape parcel lies across Mission Avenue to the north. This triangular
parcel slopes downward about 250 feet in a northerly direction to a Light Industrial (I-2) Zone.
The I-2 Zone runs north about 600 feet and has recently been developed as a non-retail
business/office center with much of the space yet to be rented. There are no observable
indications that neighboring duplex units are being used as business sites.
Background: The application for the proposal was submitted to the Division of Planning on June
121 2000. The application was determined to be "technically complete" on July 13, 2000. A
Notice of Application was issued on August 4, 2000, with a 14-day comment periad ending on
August 18,2000.
~
The applicant is engaged in a business which involves the utilization of computers, the intemet
and telephones. The computers and telephones would be used to buy and wholesale industrial
products to industries inside and outside of the Spokane area. The applicant states that there
would be no need for wholesale shippers and customers to access the project site as all shipping
would be made directly to customers from the applicant's suppliers. All ordering would be by
computer and telephone.
The applicant currently operates his business out of his home at 7810 South Pineview Lane,
Spokane. He intends to use the duplex unit addressed as 13724 East Mission for his business
and allow the continuation of the residential use of the remaining unit. Operation of the business
from applicant's home will cease. The applicant will not be residing in either duplex unit while
engaged in his business. He has been advised by Planning Division Staff that not living in the
duplex unit where his business will be locating is inconsistent with Zoning Code home industry
criteria, Section 14.16.240 (4c) (Urban Residential-3.5 Zone Requirements).
Site Plan: The project site plan shows all improvements currently located on the project site. The
~ application specifies that no new improvements are proposed. No signs will be posted on the
: exterior of the building or anywhere on the project site. Only the applicant and two employees will
be engaged in the business. The business will locate in the west one half of the duplex. The
other dwelling in the east one haif of the duplex will continue to be used as a residence. Once the
business is operating there will be no extemal indications that a business is occurring on premise.
There will be no additional demands on public services and facilities compared to the residential
use of the subject premises. No alteration of the exterior landscaping is proposed.
CUE-11-00
Staff Report - September 20, 2000 Hearing
4of7
.
I Staff Analysis:
Comprehensive Plan: The site is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan,
and the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) established in response to RCW 36.70A, the Growth
Management Act. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for the development
of a"citylike" environment which includes various land uses, intensive residential development,
and public facilities and services. The Urban category states that the more intensive uses such
as light industrial and neighborhood commercial should be located near the heavily traveled
streets, with the less intensive uses such as residential isolated from the noise and traffic. The
Urban category indicates that buffering, screening, or other performance standards may be
required to make potentially conflicting land uses compatible. _
Very few Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines exist in the Urban category that address
home businesses. Objective 1.1.i states that " Home occupations may be allowed provided they
are non-disruptive of neighborhood amenities". The Urban category does not specifically
recognize a"Home Industry", however, a Home lndustry is similar to a home occupation and is an
allowed use in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone provided the applicant applies for and
receives approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
Decision Guideline 1.1.7 suggests that prior to approval of an operation of a home (industry)
within an existing residential area consideration should be given to the following:
a) disruption of residential amenities concerning sight, sound, smell and similar factors; or
b) create traffic which exceeds road design or which develops traffic hazards within the
neighborhood; or
c) negatively affect the intended uses within this category.
The applicant's business will not generate any commercial automobile or truck traffic. The
applicant will not display any commercial signs or other external indications that a business exists
on premise. The business will not produce extraordinary light or glare, generate additional
sewage disposal, require additional potable water beyond what is deemed normafly characteristic
of a residential use. As a result, the proposed conditional use will have no adverse impacts on
vicinity land uses and public services and facilities.
It is noted that the above decision guidelines refer to "home industry." This term that is not
defined by the Comprehensive Plan. However, the clear implication of the term is that it means
an industry which is operating in a structure where people are sleeping and using the premises to
meet their day to day living needs. The County Zoning Code, Section 14.300.100, page 12,
definition of Home Industry provides precise meaning to the term and will be addressed
immediately below in the Zoning analysis section. Since the owner/operator of the business will
not reside in the duplex unit the proposed use can be considered a"commercial use" as defined
by the Zoning Code, Section 14.300.100, page 7, and be limited to locating in those zones
specifically allowing commercial uses.
= Zoning Analysis: The proposal is located in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. The
: - purpose of the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone is to implement the lower residential density
range of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The intent of this zone is to promote
areas of primarily single-family residential use in an urbanized neighborhood setting, having a
high level of public services.
A Home Industry is an allowed use in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone provided the
applicant applies for and is granted a Conditional Use Permit and demonstrates compliance with
the Conditional Use Permit criteria of the Spokane County Zoning Code. Sections 14.404.101
and 14.616.240(4) of the Spokane County Zoning Code identify the criteria governing the
approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry.
CUE-11-00
Staff Report - September 20, 2000 Heanng
5 of 7
.
.
• ...-.x '
Section 14.404.101 of the Zoning Code states that before a Conditional Use Permit is approved,
the Hearing Examiner shall find that 1) Adequate conditions and restrictions are attached to the
development of the property to ensure that the proposed use will be compatible with uses
permitted outright in this location; and 2) The special standards as outlined in the Zoning
Code for the underlying zone shall be met. Criterion 2 is again repeated in the introduction to
the Urban Residention-3.5 (UR-3.5), Conditional Use Section, Section 14.616.240.
Since criteria 2 immediately above makes no qualification, the criteria intends that a proposed
conditional use must be consistent with all development criteria listed in said code for the specific
conditional use. In regards to the subject application, the development criteria specified in Section
14.616.240 (4) apply to any home industry locating in an Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone.
Review of the proposal's compliance with the specific development criteria for a Home
Industry as identified in Section 14.616.240(4) is as follows:
Section 14.616.240(4a): The property shall retain its residential appearance and character,
• Response: The property is primarily residential in character. The applicant's business will not
generate any commercial automobile or truck traffic, produce extraordinary light or glare, generate
excessive sewage, require additional potable water and cause no external commercial signs or
other indications that a business exist on premise. The duplex structure will not be altered in any
manner to accommodate the industry.
Section 14.616.240(4b): The use shall be carried on in a primary residence or may be allowed in
accessory, detached structures which are not, in totat, larger than two (2) times the gross floor
area of the primary residence;
• Response: The business will be conducted in a primary residence i e. the west dwelling unit
of the duplex on the project site.
Section 14.616.240(4c): Only members of the family residing on the premises, and no more than
two (2) employees outside of the family, may be engaged in the home industry.
• Response: The applicant states in the application that he is in the process of buying the
project site and will use the west duplex unit for the business and rent the east unit for
residential use. The application does not propose that the applicant or any member of his
immediate family will reside in the duplex unit housing the industry. The applicant stated to
several Planning Division planners that he does not intend to reside in the duplex while
engaging in his business.
Section 14.616.240(4d): One (1) sign identifying the home industry shall be unlighted and may
be attached or detached and shall be a maximum of four (4) square feet on a face.
- • Response: The applicant proposes no signs of any kind.
Section 14.616.240(4e): Wndow or outside displays may be allowed as approved by the Hearing
Body.
• Response: No window or outside displays are proposed in the application.
Section 14.616.240(4)(0: There shall be no stock stored nor commodity kept for sale on the
premises which is not necessary to the occupation, profession, or craft.
CUE-11-00
Staff Report - September 20, 2000 Hearing
6 of 7
r • Response: No product storage is proposedrcn the,subject premises.
Section 14.616.240 (4)(g): All material or mechanical equipment shall be used in such a manner
as to be in compliance with WAC-173-60 regarding noise.
• Response: The proposed business will generate about the same noise as a residential use of
the structure.
Section 14,616.240(4)(h): Parking, traffic, and storage requirements shall be as approved by the
Hearing Body.
r
• Response: The project site will accommodate three vehicles without any site alterations.
Storage space is not required as there will be no products delivered to the premises.
Section 14.616.240(4)(i): All storage areas shall be enclosed or completely screened from view
by a maximum six foot-high sight obscuring fence meeting accessory use setback requirements.
• Response: Storage space is not required as there will be no products delivered to the
subject premises.
The purpose and intent of the above listed home industry development criteria is to 1) limit the
scope of a home industry so that it does not adversely impact neighboring residential land uses;
2) limit the home industry so that it does not place excessive demands on public services and
facilities designed and constructed to serve primarily residential intensity developments; and 3)
that development criteria be designed primarily to be self enforcing. The latter purpose is
significant. Spokane County does not have the resources to initiate periodic on site inspections of
even a small fraction of the conditional uses approved in the last 3 or 4 decades to assure that
they conform to their performance criteria. The authors of criteria 4c above intended that home
industry owners who live on premises will have strong incentive to manage their business
operations and growth (assuming the business is successful) so that it will not become a nuisance
to their immediate families residing in the home and also to neighboring residents. In effect, co-
habitation with the business operations will encourage self enforcement of the applicable
development criteria.
Staff SummarV:
As proposed, the Conditional Use Permit for a home industry can not demonstrate compliance
with minimum development criteria as listed in Section 14.616.240(4) (a-i) of the Spokane County
Zoning Code. Specifically, the proposal is consistent with criteria 4a, 4b, 4d, 4e, 4f, 4g, 4h and 4i.
The proposal is inconsistent with criteria 4c. Criteria 4c exists to motivate the project proponent to
limit his business and conform to the other criteria, in effect, encouraging the self enforcement of
the applicable criteria as much as possible.
Attachments:
- A. Maps
: - • - Vicinity Map
• Comprehensive Plan Map
• Zoning Map
• Site Plan
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Agency Comments
CUE-11-00
Staff Report - September 20, 2000 Hearing
7of7
r
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS
VICINITY MAP
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
ZONING MAP
SITE PLAN
C tjE-A1-OCf, ~ I
~
ic~nlty
V K 4i
.
. ~ CD
02
4 r►~,►~ wni _
e ~ 1
44 1)
14 4ti 0
1. 1 u~
a,.1. rTi ~1
~~~.I~~~jt~~~,h ~
Jt,{~rti oo-*
~ ~~G ~~n ' o
~
t
y
6d p ~~~~Qa ~ 4~ 1j 'r'u~'.
v Mansfeeld
k
•
I.AdntB""'~ " I"~~ ~r ~ -
3
3
s~ ~
.
~
g ~
- 8
Y~ ~ v O
F
~ g 3
'O
x ~g' sm
_ > > Orio-I1 pr ~ ,
e ~
00
d1 7 3 8 ~ ~ ~
a ~
3,h~ ti
~ Vicin~tY MaP
~gn4100
ft (rou~ed~
~ ,1 in~ ° 2083
.
1
. ~
CU E41-00
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
I I M►rabeau ~
. i
~
i
b ~
i
i~
~
~ ' 11
- ~ ~
h-
-
p it,i ,
~
~ Mnnsfic
i
10 St
~ r - - J1
~.---i '
- ~ ~J---~
- - ~ M
, UJJJJ_lJ
o~
~ DO ~ ~
~ ~
~
_ ,
Uj4iiiiiL
,
>
FTEEM anUon
~va
~
~
LSWW ~
1
7.."
I ~
~
- - ~ I
~
a ~
' 1 C LO
! r ~
?
- o R7
_ ~ - L7 I ~ 1 ~ ■
~
~
Scale :1 inch = 1250 ft 06l15/00 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Subject Property within IUGA. A-4~ A"' Subject Property within UTA.
y~~ l l Subject Property within PSSA. A~~~ Subject Property within ASA.
CvE_11-QO. .
~ ~ isting Zo'ing I 1-3
Ex
~ r
~ I-2
~
1•
►~~~i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~r r~►
~~ii ~ i~ ►~i~~uu ~u~~~ ~r
~:~~n~i
~
~ 00F.
1-2
~
.
►
R. io
g-3 ~
~ ~
- .
, ke' ~
► ~ t
`'2
1
1'2 -jp ,
• i.f
3 g UR~Z R-
VA-3.5 ~l
.
~ UR-22 R ~ UR•3•5
UR-22 UR•3
a
UR-3.5
.22 u 1 u
1 R.3. .
R 3 .22
~R UR-23 ~ jw~ U - • U ~
~
~ JJR.22 sz
- . ~
UR-?2 I
UR-22 UR-12
R
5 f ~ p ~
D
UR3.5
~3_ ~ j
u _
6
UR 3.5 UA,22 I U
u 3 S
i 3. R 3.5 ~
.5 ~ z• t
_ uR_22
- 3; ~ R 3,
UR-22 U . S UP►.3 t
7
UA•3.5
g3
u~ 5
uR
5 u 3s
UR-~ 3 R ' • ~
UR;
:
U -3 S Zoning
3 5 ~ p6/15J00
875
c~Ie inch -
A '
~
~ ~ i ~ . ~ ~~NCkt
• 4-1 ~
. q~~ t ~GapsS 'BFCT" , r .
t~~' `t r.----- • .
~ a , ~ ` ~ ~ ~ j~ r • ~
4 sTf~ v ~ ~ v~
j
~ ~ uC~
rJ N~
~ -
5~~~.
~ NJtAy -
~ ue L~x o ~
""ISs~o'~
'a
rv,~ SS10
13114
~
~ Ga , 5, ~~w
~,r,..,_ , R ►~p ►
'pR►VE
Vhl\\) P R~
R , ;
`~''oa ' • ~ r3Rp ' ►
_ ~ ► `l
r~'~'
,
G,~ ~ ~ T Vj
t~o"~~~t'
cE
~
,A ~
~ .
1 .
` ~►5s ~o N
► ~ ►-TL
1, ~ JuN 19.
F C)00100
$`aq~, C) II .
A3 5u8~ .5 ~O ~ J
~
~
ATTACHMENT B
CONDITtONS OF APPROVAL
~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
~ t APPR4VAL FOR CU E-11-00
,
A i
DIV
ISION OF PLANNING
SPOKANE CA-)LJNI'Y _
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which
term shall include the owner(s) of the property, heirs, assigns and successors and
developer of the property.
2. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, specifically
Section14.616.240(4), and all other applicable Zone Code regulations, as amended.
(Note: should the Nearing Examiner approve this project as proposed, home
industry development criteria 4c must be excepted from this condition)
3. The applicant shall develop the property in strict accordance with the concept presented to
the Hearing Examiner. No variations may be permitted without public hearing review of
the proposed changes.
4. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a T'~tle
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This T~itle Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approva{ affecting the property in question. The Title
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall
only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Current Planning. The Trtle Notice
shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [nsert legal description here] action
approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on [date of decision of approval],
imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. CUE-11-00 is
available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Current
Planning.
5. No more than 3 persons shall be employed by the business at the subject project site.
The applicant shall be deemed as one of the three persons.
_ 6. No parlcing shall be allowed on public right of way.
- - - -
. .
r
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY COMMENTS
~ .
Lesiie ~ .
From: Hopkins,
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 12:30 PM
To: Falk, Jim
Subject: CUE-11-00 Riggs.doc
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
LDATE: July 10, 2000
TO: Jim Fafk, Associate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division
FROM: Steven P. Hofderby, RS - EHD, SRHD
SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Conditional Use Permit: CUE-11-00 (Riggs)
1. References:
a) Map of subject, scale 1" = 20', by the applicant, dated June 10, 2000, received by this office
June 28, 2000.
b) Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Quadrangle, Washington
and Idaho, Allan B. Griggs, 1966.
c) Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March,
1968.
d) Spokane County, Washington, Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service,
U.S.D.A., August, 1974.
e) Spokane County Rules and Regulations for Sewage Disposal Systems, January 19, 1995.
fl Logs of water wells in Range 44E, Township 25N, Sections 10, 14, 15, 16, and 22.
g) Field Survey Report, A 13494, Spokane Regional Health District, dated March 29, 1974.
h) Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Findings:
_ a) This project lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer.
- b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of
= Vera Water & Power Co. Water supply will be a public system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area,
inside the General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area
recommended in the '201' Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of
the Director of Utilities, Spokane County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted
March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of
individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lot is not of the proper dimensions to
permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system.
. ' .
, . ~
d) The project lies in a relatively flat area west of Evergreen Road and south of Mission
Avenue. Local drainageways are insignificant.
Proposed Preliminary Conditional Use Permit: CUE-11-00 (Riggs)
e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Garrison gravelly loam
with 0% to 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also
possible contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV.
fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield
moderate to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section
1 f shows they are from 73' to 250' deep and have static water levels varying from 47' to
158' below the surface. The Vera Water & Power Co. has indicated that it can supply
domestic use water for the project.
3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
b) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
d) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the
use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system may be authorized.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Sponsor: Sandy Riggs
7810 S. Pineview Lane
Spokane, WA 99206
Ianduse.Itr1CUE-11-00 Riggs/Ih
>
.
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
~
srcKve czuKff "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO: Spokane County Planning Department RECEIVED
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads SPOKANE COUNTY
DATE: September 6, 2000
SEP_ 0 6 2000
PROJECT: HOME INDUSTRY MARKET ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS TO MFG
FILE CUE-0011-00/ D!VISION O~ PLAIVNING
Sponsor/Applicant: BARBARA JO RICHARDS (RIGGS)
Section Township Range: 15-25-44
Planner: JIM FALK
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
2. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
3. No roadway improvements to Mission Avenue are required at this time. Road Improvements to
Mission Avenue will be accomplished per County Road Project No. 2846.
4. Approach permits are required prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System.
- END
CC: Applicant BARBARA JO RICHARDS (RIGGS)
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner JIM FALK
OFFICE OF T~~ ~~OKANE COUNTY EfVGINEER
1026 1!V Broadvvay Ave, Spokane, 1lVA 99260-01 70 {509}477-3600 Fax (5C9)477-2243
~
"ENGINEER'S COND1TION~ ~F APPROVAL." CONDITIONAL USE PERM1T
TO: Spokar~~ County P1anning Depart ent
FROi1~1: Di~risia~n of Engineering & Roads ~~[%,t_j ~
aAYE• September 5, 2000
ROJECT HOME INDUSTRY iV1ARKET ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS ~O MFG ~
P
FILE #CUE-00 11 -00!
SponsarlApplicant: BARBARA JO RICHARDS (RIGGS)
Sectian Township Range: 15-25-44
Planner: JIIVI FALK
The Spakane County Engineering Department has revievued the above referenced application. The
foilawing "Condations of Approva!" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Deparkment for
inclusion in the "Findings of Factt Conclvsions and OrderlDecision" should #he request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit ar use af property as proposed:
1 A parking plan and traffic, circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted b}r #he Spokane
County Engineer. The design, lacation and arrangement of parking stafls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Pavtng or ~ur-Facing as approved by the County
Engineer wili be required for any partion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
2 Roadway standards, typical roadvay sections and drainage p#an requirements are #aund in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resalution 95-0498 as arrrended and are applicable to
this proposal
3 No roadway improvements to Missiorr Avenue are required at this time Road Improvernents to
Mission Avenue vvill ae accomplished per County Road Project No 2845.
4 Approach permits are requ`rred prior to any access to the Spakane County Road System.
F-ND
..c AppliCant Jo F=:daRas (r:acs)
Enoineer Isur%evor
p1arqe e J--' rALK
~
• . RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTX
Falk, Jim ,
AU G 2 9 ZOQO
From: Forry, Jeff
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 10 55 AM
To: Faik, Jim DMSIOW AF PL/a1NNliVG
Subject: CUE-11-00
Please add the following comment:
r
- The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible
stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State
Building Code Act. Design/development concems include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire
hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy
classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements.
Permits may be required for any change of use to existing structures.
~
Page 1
j
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
~Vlm 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
c.(x,rcn "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO: Spokane County Planning Depart ent ~
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: September 5, 2000 ~
PROJECT: HOME INDUSTRY MARKET ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS TO MFG
F I L E#: C U E-0011-00/
Sponsor/Applicant: BARBARA JO RICHARDS (RIGGS)
Section Township Range: 15-25-44
Planner: JIM FALK
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
2. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
3. No roadway improvements to Mission Avenue are required at this time. Road Improvements to
Mission Avenue will be accomplished per County Road Project No. 2846.
4. Approach permits are required prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System.
END
CC Applicant BARBARA JO RICHARDS (RIGGS)
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner JIM FALK
,
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER: CUE-11-00
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: An application for a Conditional Use Permit for a home
industry to allow a business office in a duplex unit pursuant to Section 14.616.240(4) of the
Spokane County Zoning Code. The industry will be operated by 2 people using phone and
computers to market electronic products to manufacturers. There wnll be no walk-in traffic
HEARING DATE AND TIME: September 20, 2000 at 10:30 a.m.
APPLICANT: Sandy Riggs, 7810 S. Pine View Lane, Spokane, WA 99206; 509-891-1733
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 13724 E. Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA which is generally
located adjacent to and south of Mission Avenue, about 300 feet west of the intersection of
Mission and Evergreen Roads, in the northeast 1/4 of Section 15, Township 25, Range 44, EWM,
Spokane County, Washington
LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNIlNG
DETERNIINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available
to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later
than 5:00 p.m., September 18, 2000, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be
sent to the contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Jim Falk Title: Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA J992 0220 (509) 477-7 00
DATE ISSUED: September 1, 2000 SIGNATURECQ1IIVIF1v1S R,EGARDING ENVIROrMENI'AL CON WELCOME AT THE HEAMG.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERNIINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOK:ANE
COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANN1NG, lst Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. Tbe appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project.
This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State De artme t o lo y Oly_m ia
2. Sno •an'e~Cot ~ty Divisio of n r.ing, r~ansporta ion'~n jinw'e'e~•in"'g~; Sc~-'~ge ard
3. pokane County Division of Engtneering, Development Services; Bill Hemmings
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
8. Fire Protection District No. 1
9. Vera Irrigation District No. 15
v ~
i
.j
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DMSION OF PLANNWG A DMSION OF THE PtIBI.IC WORKS DEPAItTMEM
MICF-IAEL V NEEDHAVI, DIRECTOR Gr1RY OBERG, DiRECTOR
iNIEMORANDUM
TO: Iu . ~F: c, _ _ . ii ' • i ~I : ~ • -imimm Mi~~iix !
DevelopmenfTn ineering ervices; ill emmincs
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry
Fire District No. 1
Vera Irrigation District No. 15
FROM: Jim Falk, Associate Planner ~
• ~i.
DATE: August 23, 2000
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of September 20, 2000 at 10.30 a m.
FILE CLTE-11-00
DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit for a home industry in a duplex to use
phones and computers to market electronic products to manufacttirers.
STR. 15-25-44
APPLICANT: Sandy Riggs for Barbara Jo Richards
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency.
Please review and return any comments to me by September 6, 2000.
wc
Attachments• Notice of Public Hearing
1026 W BROAD4yAY • SPOKA`FE, WASEIiNCTON 99260-0220
PrIONE (509) 477-7200 • FAX (509) 477-2243 9 TDD (509) 477-7133
\
J i
•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS:
Application: File No. CUE-11-00; An application for a Conditional Use Permit for a home industzy to
allow a business office in a duplex unit pursuant to Section 14.616.240(4) of the Spokane County Zoning
Code. The industry will be operated by 2 people using phone and computers to market electronic
products to manufacturers. There will be no walk-in traffic.
Hearing Date and Time: September 20, 2000 at 10:30 a.m.
Place: Conunissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Owner: Barbara Jo Richards, 2611 S. Harrison, Kennewick, WA 99338
Applicant: Sandy Riggs, 7810 S. Pine View Lane, Spokane, WA 99206; 509-891-1733
Address and Location: 13724 E. Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA which is generally located adjacent to
and south of Mission Avenue, about 300 feet west of the intersection of Mission and Evergreen Roads, in
the northeast 1/a of Section 15, Township 25, Range 44, EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsign.ificance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Planning, as the lead agency on September 1, 2000. The comment period ends September
18, 2000.
Related Permits: Building pernuts
Division of Planning Staff: Jim Falk, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7200
HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing EYaminer may limit
the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on tlle record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to
persons with physical disabilities.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Plannincy, 1 ` Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway,
Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies
of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special
needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Jim Falk, File No. CUE-11-00
Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3`d Floor,
Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245.
. .
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
,
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
~
sMKAw:ca,,,"Y «ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO- Spokane County Planning Department ~
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: July 13, 2000
PROJECT: HOME INDUSTRY MARKET ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS TO MFG
FILE CUE-0011-00/
Review Date 07/10/2000
Sponsor/Applicant: BARBARA JO RICHARDS (RIGGS)
Section Township Range: 15-25-44
Planner: JIM FALK
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
2. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
3. No roadway improvements to Mission Avenue are required at this time. Road Improvements to
Mission Avenue will be accomplished per County Road Project No. 2846.
4. Approach permits are required prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System.
END
CC: Applicant BARSARA JO RICHARDS (RIGGS)
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner JIM FALK
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 10 45 AM
To: Falk, Jim '
Cc: Engelhard, Scott, Kimball, Sandy, Parry, Ed, Sims, Brenda, Darrell, Virginia, Baldwin, Greg
Subject: CUE-11-00 - Sandy Riggs
7-5-00
I have no comment on this proposal
Bill Hemmings, PE
Page 1
PA~~~ 2~ JUN 2G0 0
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Infa..........
03042 MISSION AV (START) .000 FANCHER FRONTAGE RD U 17 PAVED 20
MISSION AV .490 THIERMAN ST (END) U 17 PAVED 20
.620 BR.ADLEY RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
.770 L I LY RD ( END ) U 17 PAVED 20
.930 BOWMAN RD ( END ) U 17 PAVED 20
.990 PARK RD U 17 PAVED 20
1.110 CENTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
1.130 CENTER RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
1.230 ELLA RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
1.270 ELLA RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
1.290 ELTON RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20
MISSION AV (END) 1.510 VISTA RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20
03043 MISSION AV (START) .000 VISTA RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22
MISSION AV .120 BESSIE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22
.250 SARGENT RD U 17 PAVED 22)
.370 MA.RGUER I TE RD ( END ) U 17 PAVED
.510 ARGONNE RD U 16 PAVED
.560 MULLAN R.D U 16 PAVED 4.1
.660 WILLOW RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
.760 LOCUST RD U 16 PAVED 3ri
.900 FARR RD U 16 PAVED 36
1.010 WOODRUFF RD U 16 PAVED
1. 14 0 HER.ALD R.D ( END ) U 16 PAVED
1.260 FELTS RD U 16 PAVED
1.390 R.AYMOND RD (START ) U 16 PAVED
1.410 OBERLIN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
1.500 UNIVERSITY RD U 16 PAVED 36
1.670 GLENN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
1.750 PIERCE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
1.950 WOODWARD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36
2.020 BOWDISH RD U 16 PAVED 36 '
2.060 BATES RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
2.140 WILBUR RD U 16 PAVED 36
2.290 UNION RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36
2.510 SR-27 (PINES RD) U 16 PAVED 50
2.650 HOUK RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50
2.720 HOUK RD ( START ) U 16 PAVED 2.760 VERCLER RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50
2.900 WOODLAWN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50
3.030 MCDONALD RD ( END ) U 16 PAVED
3. 2 8 0 B LAKE RD (PVT RD ) U 16 PAVED 2:-
3.400 MAMER RD U 16 PAVED 2:.
3.520 EVERGREEN RD (END) U 16 PAVED
3.650 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
3.790 BEST RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
3.880 REES CT (END) U 16 PAVED 22
4.050 ADAMS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
4.130 MARCUS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
4. 17 0 BURNS R.D ( END ) U 16 PAVED 22
4.320 PROGRESS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
4.380 ST CHARLES RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22
4.540 CATALDO AV (END) U 16 PAVED 22
MISSION AV (END) 4.570 SULLIVAN RD U 16 PAVED 22
03044 MISSION AV (OLD SECT .000 WEST END TO CORR.IGAN R 09 GRAVEL 30 I
MISSION AV .120 CORRIGAN RD (START) R 09 GR.AVEL 30
M I S S I ON AV ( END ) .400 HARVARD RD ( S TART ) R 09 GR.AVEL 30
03045 MISSION AV (START) .000 WEST END TO FLORA RD U 19 GFAVEL 20
~
MISSION AV .280 FLORA RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.430 ARC ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 32
PAGE 2 • 10:38:05 29 JUN 2000
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
.770 LONG RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.870 ARTIES ST & CT (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.030 GREENACRES RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.270 BAR.KER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.390 HARMONY LN (PVT RD) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 38
1.490 POTOMAC LN (PVT RD) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 38
1.610 HOLIDAY LN (PVT RD) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 38
1.670 GR.ADY RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 32
1.730 HODGES RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 32
1.790 ALADDIN RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
1.850 CAVALIER RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2.050 HOLL RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2.160 GLENBROOK RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2.270 END PAVEMENT/START G R 08 GRAVEL 30
2.830 END GRAVEL/START PAV R 08 PAVED 48
2.980 CORRIGAN RD (END) R 08 PAVED 48
MISSION AV (END) 3.330 HARVARD RD R 08 PAVED 72
03046 MISSION AV (LIBERTY .000 COUNTRY VISTA DR R 08 PAVED 50
MISSION AV .230 SIGNAL RD (END) R 08 PAVED 50
.410 HOMESTEAD DR (END) R 08 PAVED 50
.460 MADSON ST (START) R 08 PAVED 50
.720 MOLTER RD R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 22
1.020 MALVERN RD (NONESTAB R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
1.220 SIMPSON RD(LIBERTY L R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
1.380 COUNTRY VISTA DR (NO R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
1.450 MURRY LN (PVT RD) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
2.860 CHASE RD (START) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
MISSION AV (END) 3.030 IDAHO RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26
03047 MISSION RD (START) .000 LINCOLN COUNTY LINE R 09 GRAVEL 18
MISSION RD .570 BNSF CROSSING #50071 R 09 GRADED/DR.AINED 10
MISSION RD (END) 1.030 STROUP RD R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10
03049 MISSION RD (START) .000 FLINT RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22
MISSION RD .500 OLD TRAILS RD (START R 09 GR.AVEL 20
1. 0 6 0 DENO RD ( START ) R 09 GR.AVEL 20
MISSION RD (END) 2.150 GROVE RD R 09 GRAVEL 20
03048 MISSION RD (START) .000 WOOD RD R 09 GRAVEL 12
MISSION RD (END) 1.000 RITCHEY RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 12
8 Records Processed
~
.
,
~
S P O K A N E-:: O L) N T Y
Pl_ANNItiG A DI~I1S[ON OF 'R{E I'liHt_:C WoittS DFPAxTM1EN-T
Gary C?berg, DirL-ctor
M E MORAND UM
DATF: Jurie =3, 2000
TO: Division of Engineering and Roads. Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandv himball
Division of Engineering and Roads, Bill Hemminv-s
Division of Utiiities, Jim Red
Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utiliry; Brenda Sirns
Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
Spokane Fire District No. 1
Vera lrrigation District No. 1_5
Division of Building and Code Enforcement. lohn "rodd
FRONI: Jim Falk, Associate Planner -P
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application, CUE-1 1-00
Attached is a copy of the above subject application submitted by Sandy Riggs proposiM-1 cki
occupy one unit in an existing duplex for business purposes. The business wil) be operated by 2
people using phones and computers to marhet electronic products to manufacturers. There will
be no walk in traffic. No new external improvements are proposed. Please review this proposal
and return your written comments and recommended conditions to me by July 10, 2000. If Vou
have any questions regarding this matter, you may contact me at 477-7228.
NOTE: The Division of Planning has attached the project SEPA Checklist at this
time. This will be the only time you will be able to comment regarding the
SEPA Checklist for this project.
jf
Enclosures
copy without enclosures to:
Sandy Riggs, 7810 S. Pine View Lane, Spokane, WA. 99206
Barbara Jo Richards, 2611 S. Harrison Ct., Kennewick, WA. 99338
. _ . - , . - . . ' . ,
-
✓!J
O N
1, 1 AQPLICATtON FOR PUBLIC~p - NG 1TEMS
CUP'S, VARIANCES, NON-CONFORMINS-US~S .
~ _ ~
f DIVISiON OF BUI LANNlNG
SPOKA~,M COUN-n
,
1-
ti
PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATiON ~
♦ Property Owner(s): .L~RRpARf1 JC ~~«rA~c~~
Street Address: flA/°P~,~U!'~
City: ~E ~~~r✓E G~'GiC- State: ~ Zip Code: 99-3-7 f
Phone. (Nome) So9 7107 ~5"L 6(Work) Fax:
APPLICANT/AGENT INFORMATION /
♦ Appiicant/AgAnt: 6&-,r,
Street Addr2ss' 7R/<? "~ti~~ .
City: ~,--Pnk-FRn_I& State* ~ Zip Code: Q~1n6,
Phone. (Home) 6 963 (Work) k0//- / 7 3 3 Fax: 9~4U- D,`: ~
REQUESTED ACTIONS(S) (Indicate appropriate action):
~ Conoitional Use Permit ❑ Expansion of a Nonconior,tning Use
0 Variance(s) ❑ Other (list)
PROJECT INFORMATION
• Exis~ing usz of property.
• Describe Fropos2d usz of the property, notina chanae from 'existino use'
1-372V ,~/'PL~F 7-C\ ;?c Cl~D in;i>1.1,57P.u )ukin)w- /'?C;.1-rRl Dr~/L~G,~ ~~kS
/37a(~ rr~
• If a varianc: applicaltion, sta#e the Code standard Gnd descrioe the variance souchz iin
como2r2b(c tzrms (i e, 50 feet from centerfine verses required E5 feet).
• 11' a condi'tianal use permit application, does proposal meet Gil standards? OY y
If not, h2s one or more variances beo-n rcquested Y N
• If horne inciustry, has ccnsul#ation occurr2d witn the Division oT Euildirg and P12nnir---
rzg2rdirg construczion or bui(ding for intended usc~ ( Y N
APPUCATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS PAGE 3 of 3
CUP, Variance. Non-conformina Uses
S1GN-OFF 6Y AGENCIES
The applicant must visit each agency whose number is circled below.
,
~ 1. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DtSTRI T ,
a. Proposed method of water supply elri
i ~ b Proposed method ofi sewage disposal&At' S~
A pre(+minary con tation has bepn held to discuss the proposal. i he applicant has been iniormed ot
requirements a stGndards We request consultation with tne Division of Buffding & Pianning• Y N
Signature Dat 2. WATER PURVEYOR: 1~~2A 04~X%EQ- 5 Pb 0-~C-P.,
a Proposzd me}hod of water supply c,c.1LrnR w~e ► c~
b The proposal isris not+jocated within the boundary of aur fuiure service area.
c. The propos is ` not located within the boundary of our current dis5ict
d• W LareVare not abie to serve this site with adequate water.
have not ceen made to s2rie this proposal.
e Satis~acto arrangement ave),
~ ~
~
C~ • /Z_ 0d
Signature Date
3. SEWAGE DlSP URVEYOR:
a Proposzd method of water I
b Proposzd rr~ct ewGge disposal
r
A prelimrnary consultGtion has be-n held to discuss the propo The aooli~nt has benn inrormed o;
requirements and stGndards.
Signature Date
4. FIRE DISTRICT / FIRE MARSHALL
a Propos2d is withrn Fire Protection Dis#rict
b Adequate arrangement havelhave not been made to meet our naeds in providmg fo; an adequate water system and facilitres for frrz protection purposcs
c Recomnenced fir2 flow 7~/~ . or unable to ca►culate now cecauSe uSe is, not
deiinitive ard will be dEiermined at bwlding permit apolication time
d Requ,rements include.
~
~
~2
. ~ ~/ac1
S gnatur~e Fire Drstrrct R Date
Aco fer P;.QI(c t-lear rs ,:ors5-5•;C-_=
f . .
APPLtCATIONS FOR PU6LIC HEARING ITEMS PAGE 2 of 3
CUP, Variance. Non-confornninq Uses
• Size of the subject property Parcel No.(s): I5 /j 09/4
• Street address of property (if known): I 37 z~- ~ Y'~ ~ S 5 i Gn1 f
• Legal description of property (include easement, iT applicable): jl,~ np, r N
Z?Lh- ilJo L7C, ~lc~CIUIy !'k~~ C'KCi w r eXr- r- ,Z0' ~ Source of Iegai: ~ I rz.,,i l9 n'! f r ,r-a j°J j17LF
• Total amount of adjoining land controiled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent-
• What interest does applicant hold in the property q,~Pe- crf,)T/S IA; ;~,,jE
PIFf:Ct as op ?C.l C/! Alr- F~TC1 0W~E Q-
A, +r,r:f i AjOu,: TQv V~
vs~c-~ ay/cELL `.'~i rruin%Q7 coMPt.,EZ ~ w,LL fxECuForj c-P'j;J; ~AJt
'R
NOTARY U f C C! 3~
State of Washington)
SS
County of Spokane )
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that: (1) I am the owner of record or authorized agent tor
the proposed site; (2) if not the owner, Wdten cermisSjpfl from owner authorizmq my actions
on his/her behalf is attached; and (3) a11 of the aoove responszs and those on supporting
documents are made truthfully and to th st ct my know ge.
Date G
Signed. _
90 r'e~~
l <
WANDA T. CLARK _ 7 •
NOTARY PUBLIC Notary Public in and fior the Sate of Washington, residing a;h
STATE OF WASHfNGTON MY aPPointment expires O/D ~v0~
EXPIRES JANUARY 6, 2003 '
~lq r,( a.. 7e / a Y~.
BURDEN OF PROOF FORM(S) (by applicant)
It is necessary for the Gpplicant or his/her represzntative to establish the reasons whv ihe
requested action should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argumEnt in favor of
approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form fve your
requested dction (variance, conditionai use, etc ) designed to help you present your case in 2
way which addresses the criteria which the Heanng Examiner must cansidEr. P(ease
complete the forrn and return with your application.
FOR STAFF USc ONLY Section Townsnio Ranee ViolationlEn-fcrcement. Y N
Lot, legal & 2dd'I ownership checked by
Person doina preapp conf.
Other/previous Division of Building and Plannmg acuons mvolvina this propery-
Ceriir"icate of Exemption No Appiication No Hearing pate Various siie pian dimensicns check by
. , .
Po~
CONDtT10NAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FORM '
UN
~ ~y~►~~c'' Name:
Fiie.
CONDITIONAL USES, State Law, Scction 36.70.020 (7), clarines that the County regulations
must soeci'ry the standards and crizeria that sha11 be -CQplied in the review by the Heanng
.
Examiner Concition(s) or zoproval may aiso te added to assure compZ, L~oility wi~ o~er uses in
the same zone.
A Assuminq the proposal is listed Gs a "penmirtcd" ccrcitional usc, do you bel~eve the procasal
mE°{s a11 0f the rEquired, estaolisned 2nd 2pclic2efe s;and2rds?
/ 41 c.:•.ii .
R. , TA
~c
~T,✓c: c / G/ ~ ~ P1 C
~ . .
B Ir yOu Cannot me°t the conditional uszs requirzd standards, cf2 YOU Sc°<lfld feljEj py Qgolyina
for an P-dminissGtive exce?tion or a van2ncz? Yes No ;i
C What hGve you cone or coufd yau do to
1 - MG^k° the usz comoatible witn oUher permitzd acjbvities in t;he s2nne vic:
/
ni'ry or zene?
/VO l N~ll~i'..~ O.-,G,o~'-G~..~~_Q -~.r"'~' T~+. f.~'..~+..•.. .t..t~`Ci'~. ~ T~ rv,f /r ~ ~ ~
~•c-l'•-r_ .tr~.G'l /"vt 2. EnsLire Zcains' imcosing excessive demands ucon public uuiities? 1272.~ cL, ~
~.c=G;~ ~sl cL:.~.e~,~i~. ,c.~,~ nz-~'r' R~~.~-~~ ~r~-~ ~c~~~e.. ~ ,•~y~,. ~
.,e, 17- 1-- /7115~~
D Explain haw or wny the prooos21 will not Ce detrimert2l to:
1 Tne Comorehers^ie Pian.
ci
.c
2 S u rrQU nc i ng proce l4q,_1C/~'~'~^z j~"' '''-c.~-c-f~ .c~.,~-,-~
/Z.-~~. .r./1'~..d~1C:'(/"~- ~~.Q.Cs-•-~- ,/!f' :.~-G,~ -t'/~..,_,
V
E Wmci fcasOtlcDlz fe5►T1CitGf15, conditrQns er s2rcguaros wli! L'ohald the SPIrIt cn~j in;er~t (~.~ayit~.~
~~tciy ct-ld eerieral we!«re) of the Zonina Ccde AND mitieafe ctly 2CVE!z-Z EfflcC~ LPGfI iii°
ne :onborino proc2r6es -includina but not (imited to 1) um- lirnits,
2) front, side or r=f yara
CTec{e-f than mmimum stcied, 3) suitable lands.:2-ping; 4) S,CfiIl1C; 5) cf?G O)
Ot~ .~f S 7
61 m^-~y ~ n~/'..CC1~•, .•f' l / f"C ~ ; / . •?!:~r4..~?.c/~. c~•~.tL,1.
C~LL -t"~ , ( L✓.i+~. /k2.t,/ /L~iilj.f,G.C7~ ~
~ NC.(~~, i >
a-~,~✓ ~Z`~.t~ ~ ~ ' , ~ r~.c~,::-~.,~
t.,.~
.
CL - -=LJ~~1=-N Gr- rF~00r= RE`/ 2-S9
. ~ r
. ~
1
, s J1 .J
E'
~
J/Eljq r
l - E11?~.
~
gF ?4~
~ .
'V ~
NV
~ ST
c~
, IN PN
,
a~~~ ~
4 . .
i .
~L
~ ~ •1
, _
5 y
-u,r ,~i
T
~
SEPA ENVIROs'V~IMNTAL CHECSLIST
WAC 197-11-960
Spokane EnvironmentaI Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1)
PURPOSE OF CKFCKLIST
The State Envirorzmental Policy Acz (SEPA), cnaoter 43.21C RCW, requires all sovernmeatal a~encies
to consider the environmenE al unpacts of a proposal before making decisions. r'~n environmental
impact statement (EIS) rnust be prepared for -all proposals wich probable signiFicanc adverse i1npaccs on
the qu:~lity of the environment_ The purpose of this checiclist is to provide information to help y ou
and the 3gency identi.fy ~pact from your proposal (and to reauce or avoid unpacts from the proposa.l,
if it can be done) and to help Lhe agency decide whether an EIS is required.
IIVSTRUCTIO:VS FOR APPLICr1.rV7'S
This environmencal chec'.t]isc as'~s you to describe some b~ic intormation about your proposal.
Governmencal a~encies use this checklist to deterrYUne whecher the environmental impacLs o; your
proposal are significant, requiruig preoaration of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, tvizh the mos-,
precise inforrnation known, or give the best description you can.
You must axiswer each question accurazely and carefully, to the bes of you: knowle~e. In rnosz
ca.ses, y ou snould be able to answer the questions from y our ozvn obse:vations or project plans
without the need to hire eYpe:u. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does r.ot
apply to your p; oposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complece a"swers to the ouesions
now may avoid unr_ecessary deIays later.
Some qt1eSti0iIS ask- a00LL gOvernmental C2gulaL10IIS, SllCh aS ZOt11Iij, shoreline, i,:lc
desi~nations. ~ns~-z: thesz ques-ion if you can. If yoL have proble_~s, the goLe,nmerit,1 ;,goncjes cdn
assist you.
The chec'. .isr q~esuons apply to all p3rts of your proposal, e~.en 1f you p1a~ zo do thCm ovai s ee-ioc
of time or on cifte:ezt parcels of land. Attach any additional iniormacion tna~ Nvill hel~ des`-i~e your
proposal or ics envLronmental effects. The agency to n%hich you subma.t this checklis May „s~; you to
eYpla~n your .i.nswe:s or provide addiuonal information re3sonably relaced to dete;rnir~j i~ t:,e-e rna;r
be si Jnific-it adve: se imoacz.
I
USE OF Cf1EC "n'.L.IST FOR rVOcV-PROtECT PROPOSALS:
Comolete this checkl:st for non-; roJect proposals, even thougn questions msv be •,dC2S r Gt
ao iv." Iti a.~ ~ jAf F, ~ jE .
. P, ~~iTIG~i, cor~p 1.e t. e Suj PLENt£~T~L SHEE? FOR NO~;-PRO CT ~~'1'~p~S T,J~
Foc non-~,oje`. :c~~ors, c~:e refe-e:~ces in che check.~lsz to the nords " Pro eci"^ ~
• ) ~ and
prooe,-z, o: i.CJLi n , 'n n 'n n ~ aDTPC :a.
be re~d us "t.rooosal proposer ~.r~d afiecred ?eoQ-- ' ~
respective?v
CJO~:.1'1~ i.:: 1-C---~=~••-~: 0:d:P.1i C°
I -w 0' 2
f
! .
A. BACKGROWi D Fa-F-/PROJECTNo. DOOD4-,pS0
1. Na.me of proposed project, if applicable:
T
/.~^7~Z~' r/~'1 /SSIO/`J_ Cvti~i~ic.~~.~4[, lo ,1'rGLCx,J 7~I4S 742MCZ-SZD
nF vuPcEeC
~i 17E 7-t-I -R' Co.o^.c 1-161"TE INDLI I~7'Y
DENi ;FlL C..~/i.: /r✓~
2. Na.me of aoplicant:
S,'n1,---O2..D i&l QS ►v D~/~ 2l C~ ~
~
3. Address and pnone number of applicant and conLacz pe:son:
7 ,2.~'-
/.:;,N 99/ - / 733
991.)
4. Dace checklist prepared:
,/UA.)F 7. zvoo
5. Agency requestina ci-2ecklisz:
41C /t.'C~-
6. Proposed timi~g or schedule (includin~ pla~sin;, if aoplic~ble):
.C.OnU r-v A, C. L?P
So0ka:':, E:1v::J1E'1:::::.~ C° CE:~C~:!•S~ 7~a~' ~ G' ? _
A. BACKGROUND (conunur.i):
,
7. a. Do you have any plans for future addicions, espansion, or furher activiry related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, e:cplain.
r Ll7q E k Ti Ty 23c~G/11~ !."~G/~ i ~C 1 nJ.~t.LS ~ pc~ /J
b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacenc to this proposal? If yes, explain.
/t/0.1.
~ k~rk ~S ~ n)T~ rl~~~r •
S List any envi~-onmen~al informacion you know aaout that has been prepared, or will 5e przpared, cirectly
related to tEis prooosal.
Noti:,:~ Ls fiJ 7Re p. ~'Q tt rr D . C cf2,~ F,~.Ji
A,k),~ PR cT l_13rlGir F) ^C.. Dr.dPLZV 5`11Cf ~r✓cE,~,c.~~~ ; aJ l9 7y-
9 Do you krio-~%- whecher aoplications are pendin; for goverr.mental approval.s of othe: proposals d!rectl,;
affectino the crooe*r-: covered by your prooosal% I~ yes, e:cpI~n. '
~ ~ . . /'J o G:.)E ^i AP C~Jc'- 1~r,~!'.% j r' i Ec`. f.•~► V
i ~
1G Lpst any c'oV`--menL ,;:)provals or permics cnat ri-ill be nee~Zd iOt yOLi propos:.1, if knc;vn
PFfZ-G/~J l7! S 1tZ t (i ~
J
PA l~1~1 t`~k 4 ~r~;,~L,~, S~G:t~i~~ r~C.~-•Cr,,?~;L .~;Li'~ ~ISl~C1f1
Orc_-=ce C iecl- is; Pa`- ' -oC? 1
• J 1 ♦
A. BACKGROUiND (conunued): .r
11. Give a brief, comoletp. descripuon of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the vrojer azd
site. There are several questions later in rhis che~_~Iisc that ask you to descnbe certairi 3specu of your proposal.
You do not need to repeat those ans-wers on tEs page.
. G(?/,~, i t~' ~ L`r 17u Pl~X, r7.~% /j? F•~/if fr?~; L,•,?~l~~,`' %{C:`f. G ~~~.1 i ATi ~c- K~~?f ~,~uST~<~
~
C SS fjL'n %W~^ f EG=Lc ~L1f:1tiC-' ,47 -'~tiU►=.S ND
L✓IL i Sl ? A !n GniA~, ~ kE G✓~~s'~-~ . C=~ j ti~: ' ~~2 QF i~t.,'P«i << /qr=: r''Ai
J u
(•~`/'1%%C;~~~PcIiERl STVL'~ ()i- 90frt /n 1rV.5772y',
12. Location of the prooosal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the prec:se location of you:
proposed project, including a strze1 address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal descriotion
sice plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if re:sonably available. \'Uhile yau should sLbmit any pians ~
required by the agency, you a-re not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with an; perrut
application relsted to this checklisz.
C~;= t~uFcj--,1-, Lv►r(4 i~ P 4464_F 13`72~o E r~is$ r~.~; .
l~8 f ck TL 1 ! L ~V fiDKIi/`)~ tVC
~
1~. Does the prooosed acLion lie within the AquiEef Sensitive Area (1~SA)? The General Se~ti•e: Senrice Are2? The
Prioricy Szlve7 Sein, ice Are3? The Ctty of Spok..s:e? (See: Spok3ne Count;r's ASA Overla: zone Atlas for
bouadaries).
~
/A/ lqLA:- /A1
. r
Qy
Evaluation For
, AQency Use OnIy
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICAiNT
,
B. EN~'VIR0NN1ENTAI. ELE.ti1EMS:
1. E.kRTH
a General description of the siEe (circle one) D rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, othe: •
b. What is the steepest slooe on the siie (appro:cir~.ate percent slope)?
< U,
~ r
c. What general cypes of soils are found on the siie (for ex3rnple, clay, s3nd, gravel, peat,
muck)% Ii you know the classiticauon oi agriculn:ral soils, specify thzm and note any
prirr►.e farmland 1
~c~1 PR~~ll'.AiJ,J
S PCt~ArJc V k(.L. ~tt ~COCKq F'
4 .
L-jI 'VK ~j{?r1 Oi- ~r~ Z Cc~~JC2tr~.
i
17R( t,'~U,'~IS .
. • . .
d. A: e there su: race ir_dicstior.s or niszorf or unsta'ole soils u: the immediate vicin.ity)
Ii so, describe.
/VU
i
e Desc: ibe the purr-pose, t;r-pe a.nd aoproximace qua.~tities of any filling or gradiU-10
praposed Indicstd sou:ce of fill.
/.S ~A
f. Could erosFon occur .:s a result of clearin;, constrsccion, or use? If so, ~ene: ; 1y
e~s~.rsoe.
~R l'~ / C'✓ ~~f 1 ~.L_ 0i c./P, 4 L~A~z s~.t/_~ 7 U/(
;
.~'~1 ~T, Ph'' i F 7 U.~ 1~~-1- L'✓;.~=/ C.~ C_' ~ l.~.lc' F_- r~. ~ c;
Spo'::~ E~:~•.:-o:-..: 07' :.::-cC C~ec'_l►sZ P~.Qe 6 o; _ t
• , ' /
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. E~~IVIRONNIEN?'AL ELEN =S (Contrnucd):
,
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with imoervious surfaces afLer project
construction (for example, asphalt or bLildings)%
'Z- r u2~-:~~JT . Ek►ST1N6- De2I t,~-Eu,,RLZ AQE 4AJ~ FQk
,6 ,~0- 74 S~4,-4 or i,,rF Dc; PL-E x< I eYc /_LF C 0E F A(-c, S 1T-E,,ur_,
/~'Gl P.,TNEf` iM, PE/', V;0<4S SU~fAGtC "1?c~ .
h. Proposed measures to reduce or conLrol erosion, o= oti~er imoacts to the earh, if any.
N0
2. AIR
a. What type of emissions co the air n oul~ : esult from the proposal (i.e., dust,
auromobile, odors, i~-~dustrial, wood smo'_~e) during cons*-ucr~on and whez the projecz
is completed? If any, generally describe and give appro.Y!mare Quanriues, if known.
/11/0 C~,R~_,~7'~~~C_Ti~?~J FF,Plc~ .
I
% ?F;(,Pr-iFL D(-),4J AJCi 2~nG~~t
Or, 4.AN3,4CP,fit CifAnf~-E .
b Are Lhere :uiv of~-site sou, ces of e.-~issions or odor tha[ z1aV aiie ~ y our p; oposal?
If so, gene: a11y describe.
n/o rVF--~~ 7-C -~06110r1C-1r of 1--1n1.;.)1nsJ 04,~ ~~&.40 F.PE
~P E ~ttii ~}A /~nJT7G~ ti'r,C' T~J -
c Prooosed r,.e3surns co reduce or con«ol e:nissions cr other 1Ii1D3CIS i0 ~t2;, 1{ any.
OP, 11r'11,qrT( !U l'/l' L'J/L~ EE D,,:jC.
Spoka::e En• t O_.: ~
~
:~."':::'.C:! Ci1e:k~'.St Ps`~ 7 oc
. ~ ,
Evaluacion For
Agency Use Only
B. E'N"VTRONiNIEINI"Aj, Ei F",IE-N-I-S (Conunued):
3. WATER
a Surface:
1) Is there any surface water bodv on or in t~:e imme~iaze vicinzry of the sice Cincludin,
,
year-round ar_d seasonal streams, s-Jlw3CZr, Iakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, sate wha. szrea - or river it flows into.
006-S' n~~~7- 4f?r't-v •
~ .
NiD ,~~!~'f6s'~ GcJ•S'T~' ^,.~{'i_; T~i,~ /-~PC~f-,eiC/ ,
T
srot~~n1~ r, vf,Z ~ i M, ,c..t fiv.;At~.
2) Will the project require any work ove:, in, or adjacent to (u;irhin 200 feec) the
described waL°; S, IF ves, please describe and anach available plans.
7) n, r A/t~ T ~APiJI- c/ .
!
3) Estimate the a:-rzount of fill and dred~e material thar would be placed i~z o; removed
from surface n-aLe; or weclands and inclicace the area of tne sice that woLld be a{reGjed.
Indicaze the source oi' fill matenal.
/
4) NUill the proposal reeuire suriace water wizhdraw.:.ls or diversions? Give acrene;,;,1
descriotion, pur2ose,~ snd approxim.~te qu:~rtitles 31
4ro~n.
i
5) Does zhz p; opcs,:1 lie ;vithin a ICQ- jear floodpLun% I."so, noce locizlon on the shL
plsn
~/~'f,►; c'-F' i C/ / ` ~ ! h_ ."1,' ' ; C n~r% : / ~t~ ~rL~t'~~c
, , .
s
• { /
Evaluation For
-Agency Use Only
B. ENNVIRONMENTAL ELE1MNI"S (Continued):
,
6) Does the proposal involve any c~ischarges of waste macerials to surface ~vaters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anzicipated volume of discharge.
Z) Cv--- _ S NQ 1- A P~-~/- u. N U P, f C; C i~ Vi -A i E,z, i':P`E.~t !v ` .
On. ~1~~',~`~~•
b. Ground:
1) Will 0groundw3tZr be withdrawn, or will wacer be discha_r~ed to ground wate.?
Give generat descriDtion, purpose, and appro:cimace quancities if kno~vn.
L7L/PI~X AJ,~% cfC I ~CCC~E pF_ 7)
i _
-(~[SCl.lr7('~6<: 11I Iq S,4f11~/-~2j) S62I Y1,1'iivFJFL~~ ~(/S'icE~ ,
10 0, 0 CYaL -rp.c -DPr,jn~r~E~.~.
2) Describe w-aste material that -will be discharged into the g-ound from septic t:~nks or
ocher sanitar-y wasze treatment facibry. Descnbe the general size oi the system,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or tne
numbeY of pe; sons the sfstem(s) are expecLed to serve.
OIVE 1.~Ll~'~~~~ rlW`1 /?'JuP,F "lTrfil.~ /~~I~PCc' T~lr~4, l~E(~~LE l`L.F
TN ~ /~i:'C►~~~T~l iT~ aZ ~~NL ~J f ( ~,li; ~ i~,i !~/yc/
3) Describe ani- s; stems, other than zhose desi;ned for the dispos :l of s:;nitary u aste,
inSLalled fOr Lhe pumose of dischsraing fluids belo-vv the around suricuce (includin,
s; stems such as Lhose for the d.i5pos31 of scorm wuter or drainage from loor es>
Describe the -i; pe oi sysEem, the amount of material to be disposed oi th:ougn the
system and ch.- types of macerials likely to be d.isoosed oi (includin; materials which
may enter the syszerri inadve: tencl.y chrou-n soills or as a result of fire figntina )
l
uCL1V1iIeS).
n/n ~-;^:,i:-c' r'~vf~~/~r ~'Fc~ T~r:CS~~•J LC 1~c..x.(,:~~~f~.~ -
,
Spoka^e Envi,onrr,-2-_0-~.-Z;:ce C11:C;IIs7 P
aj , - Q 0.
! 7 i
1 •
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. EvVIRONIV1ENTAL ELFsMENTS (Conhnued):
4) Will any chemic3ls (especially organic solvenu or petroleun fuels) be stored in above-
ground or underground storage tanks? Ii so, what types and quantizies oi materi~ wi11
be stored?
~(0 SE,~r,
5) Whac protective measures will be taken to ensure zhat leaks or spills of any chemicals
stored or used on s.ze will not be allowed to percolate co groundwate: (this includes
measures to keep cnemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) ana 3b(3)?
ND C-.41 c r7 : C sa L S aSf
_U /76. ~ ti^EJ n• ~T ~F~'~ 1~ . ~
c. ``Uater RunoEF (including storm wacer)
1) Describe the soLrce of runoff (iricluding storm wacer) and me-hoa of colle-,:-Lion and
disposal, if any (include quantiLies, if known). Where will this wate: #10w? Wi11 this
water, flow into othe: cYaters? If so, describe.
-C% cX:/1',' C C.Le- r TiC/A,' ..quS T P 41NC. CJ
~ / Qrr
~J/LC
1 4-r,s~~ ~ ~ rlE -
Wi11 any chemic 1s be stored, handled or used on the site in a location whe: -e a s-oill or
leak will drain to s,,,iace or aroundwater or to a szor:n wace- d:soos 1 s-ysem
~
discha: ,,ing to surfsce or jroundn•:.te.?
/i/.) t~r~E n^ i~,cc.i ~G "6_1P,4lf'rJ 0 Gf C !•1 6 n T rJ S
~ ~round or surface ~•aters~ I so, -P• ~er~l; desc-ioe.
3) COLld tiaStC IT'?a'~.~: ente.r ~ ~
l,0 L:,%~'
i
J, •='i ; ! ; : ~ ~'.t Lf _ ~•F ~ ~1 C~
J~~- t~ L 4= DO_ A/C>
_ . ~
,
/
~ p r' f • ~ ~!J ...r / : •
^
SUOi..a i° En% 1'fli2.'i7z-.._..1 Cr'eckl'Sl 1~^Cn I V 01
u~ ?
. ~ `
Evaluation For
Adencv Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, b_ ~
Q-ound, and runoff water unp~CES , if
any (if the proposed action lies within the Aauife: Sensitive Area be especially clear on
exolanations relatinj to 'i'acilities concerning Sectior.s 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this
checklist).
ND ~pvi7.~~~,~L R.x~~1t/~R~l'rE•J1~
~
74' D.DZO 7-0 ni= i,.e& Sr Ok.r4 r,.6 t/e9z ~E v` 7`R/S
4. PLAN7S
a. Check or circle types oE veaetat:on found on the site:
deciduous t; e'• alu'er, maple, aspen, ocher
'.i evergreen tree: fir, ced;u , pine, orheT
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or ~racn
wec soil planu. caZail, burtercup, bullrush, skunk caobage,
othe:
w ater planzs: water lily, eelgrass, mifoil, othe:
other types of ve~etation
b• Whaz 1-c-ind and anount of vegeration w211 be removed or altered)
~
c. List threatened or endangered speCies known co be on or near zhe sire.
/'✓i1 % Q,F ~ IJe~~:~C-c~~Se`~ S~'t(!~~ ,~e:;c. ,4.'✓~4J✓
0'6 0"*J
d. Prooos~d landscaDin~ us~ of nati~•e-olanu or other
~ 4 ~1 1 ~
rneasures to or~-ser,-e or enhance vegecanon on the sice, sf anj-
,
c~ ~ ~ ~~e 1 I o:-? 1
~ l •
Evaluation For
Aoency Use Only
B. Ev1,qROiVME~3'TAL ELEMEIN"I'S (Continuctl):
,
5. ANIMALs
a. Circle any birc's ar_d animals which have been obs---ved on or
,
near the site or are known to be on or neai the size:
bir ocher:
birds: h~aw~ he: on, eagle, on-
mammals: de-: aver ocher:
, bear, elk, be ,
fish. bass, salr~on, trout, her;-,ng, shellfish, otne:
b List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
/1.119 &1c- P F t K 40v✓.v 7T,
c. Is che site purt or a migration route? If so, e:cplain.
W07'"
d. Proposed measures ro preserve or enhance 'Wildlife, if any:
/!/c?7 ~°G~/'//✓'.~,'~- G.-~A:..~r--. ~+~t-~ ~'~u'c! (.,,-f' ~/.J r(_'F
- . , . .
U.i f /Pc _'c'/ v x' 9.E'i✓7 ~0,✓6,L iA,,
6. EiN E R G Y A \D ~Tb-RA L RESOLtRCES
a. Whac kinds of energ~y (elecLric, natural gas, 011, ryoce stove, solar) w•ill be used
to meet the compleced oroject's ene:; needs' Describe -,vheeher it wdI be used for
hearzng, m3nuiacLurin~, ezc.
h'~: /''~L`~ ~'.CF f;/✓.~i ~.J.~LL. ~ 4;.'~~ n.'~,~~ !r
b ``vould y-Ot:' Lhe Fete~~ia1 Lse o* SOIn- ene~ay b- ad):eCenC DrO~z.leS?
I` so, gene-alI,: c°sc-
A/t% ~r7- ~tJO!~ nJc/
. ,
Spoksne En- Ch--c'.-:list 1 a~e l? c; %
i
• ♦ 1 Evaluation For
Aoency Use Only
B. Ei~JVIRONt'Y1ENTAL ELEI~IENTS (Continucd):
,
c. What kinds of energ}r conservation features are 111cluded in the pla.ns of this proposal?
List othe: proposed rnea.sures to reduce or conLrol ener,7, impacu, if any:
7. ENVIRONN1ENT'AL HE.-%,,LTH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including eYposure to tosic chemicals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or haza: dous waste, that could occur as a result of thls
proposal? If so, describe.
1) Describe special ernergency services that rught be required.
1110:f
2) P;oposed me3si-ires to reduce o; cor_trol enyironrnental
healch haza-c~s, ir lln;-.
44); lPl y
b. iNoise
(;or example:
1) WhaL types of naise e:cist in the a: ea which m-ay aflect your pro)ecz
traffic, eqLipment, operation, ozhe'))
c
A.,'b f1G>>i716 S F~'•r~
~vhac tti-~nes j-~zis oi noisz :ti-oLlci be creaced bv or assouace:f Vvith .he proje ~
- , .
on a shor-L-tzi rn. O: a lOtl~-i°-m b~s:S (for e:~arrnple' Lraff1C, COI1Sir'LICL?Oil, operacion,
` ~ oL~ie~.-1 Inaica:o r---` noL:sr_oise com~ f;O.r'I C~'~e s«e.
~
. /;i♦ f nL~/~~G/-~~/~i
~
/Df i.J1,,,-:
~ ~ J
,
:
Ci:~1"a~° ~ 1 2 1
, ~ . Evaiuation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIR0NTMENTAL ELE.ti1EiNTS (Continucd):
,
3) Proposed measure to reduce or concrol noise impacu, if any:
NO /'161 -5Ci'f,- ARZ AJcr- E.S/?G.</ ,4r lr~l2. /~i~C~~ri GViLL. /JC i, .
.
i,/--) trcJ.'%.(.. ~-A- Q: u LL/ C G t, ! t" lJ / nl (r~
S. LAND AND SHOFE?.INE t1SE
a. What is che currenc use of the sice and adjacenc properies:
i~f.5tJ4nu71RL "DtJ/oc.Ex BCi K6Ac! f1,Ur? G,JE_`,i . G)FeI•l "~J)
AJ0~..Tr-1
b. Has the sicz been used for agriculture? Ii so, describe.
.Ires on the site.
c. Desc: ibe ariv struic-
;f r'C& t) ~1 .
d. ~,~vill any st: accu-es be dernoltshed? If so, which)
^ 1-
e WhaL is the currer_: Lonina classiiication of the sice?
FII' iiOL1C'"1~_..~1 ~ :.r:CL C.~'°_Cl•~'Si ~~+5~ ~ ° G~1 ! ~
SPO'ia:tc
. r ~ .
Evaluation For
Aaency Use Onlv
B. ENVIRONV1El'I'AL ELE_b1Ei\t'T'S (Conhnued):
!
f. What is the current Corrlvrehensive Plan designaLion of the site?
.
i
g If aoplicable, wh3c is the current shoreline master p-ogram designation af the si~e~
- ,
h. H3s any part of the site been classified as an "environmenLa?1y sensitive" area.)
If so, specify.
PAST ,&.1 Y~.Pf-Ir- .
~
i. Aoorommately hojv many people would reside or work in tne completed project?
j. -kooroNimately how many people would the completed project aisplace?
C~~ • (~J~?/c'c/',~ ~ t~r.'A%..~ bc~i~c) '/E.~~ f/- /G - f~;
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement imr)acts, i2 any:
~PPL~~r^,h-'T ~rJ,f,~~ ~.~r if~-/ i ~~1.~~~~; " C,~~ l~F,~~~ i:~J ,R[~l/a~..t
~ C3` Or).
1 Proposed r-leasures to ensure the prooosal is compsublP wSZ: e:<astinc, :~c projeczed
land uses ar.,-:, pl.;L115if 0.--l;;
~!c u //V` Ai/'
f •C~~ l.~.X_~ ~l ~/~r1.. OP LC
C'
~ r')~ F~.E F .
Spok:ii.° Cf '.l'.I:SL ~,"JJ L ~ ~
Evaluation For
A`ency Use Only
B. ENVIR0NMENT AI., EI.EI'IENTS (Continued):
,
9. HOtiSING
a. Appro~cimately ho~v many unirs would be providee, if any? Indic3te wneL'ner hicrh,
middle, or low-income housing
; S j; NG' L, JG l.~LIP~C%e . ti C T~? ! uT~ L.E
b ApproXimately how mo-ny uniu, if any, would be elinninated? Indicate whe-her hi~h,
middle, or low-incorrie housing•
A.JC'ti.14-D ti.Ci 1-1~ED
%rc.~ ~ r~~/,.~ • .
. •r
c. Proposed measures to reduce or conzrol housinc, lrriPacts, 11 any:
Al(9 ? DD
r
1Q. AESTHETICS
a Wnac is the tall-esz he:ght of a.~y proposed s«aaure(s), noc including anten.rnss;
R: nat is the princapa.l e-cce: tor building m:.terial(s) proposed%
C. U~'~~ ~.,r" ~ i c- /L~r? i S I~~?~L t~(.':_! iE ~ 1 D I n.~~ G J iL,c..
,
/?J S~IG~f• ,
b WhaL views in the irnmediace vicinity would be altered or obstrtcLed?
f'✓ / ; / C~~ /t~ r,.'' rILN ..J
1
c Proposed meas-,.:: es to =eaLCe or control aeszne[ic irn-oaCLS, is aniv
L
Gi7 , ,
it` 4. 6
Ch .S~e 16 0 ~ ?t
. ~ -
Sooks-te E't'i:o:t:~Z-_ :l C=;-~ ec.:! s: P
, Evaluation For
A2ency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELF.~I~IE-INTS (Continued):
,
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. Whac rype of light or alare will the proposal produce% What tune of day would it
m-ainly occur?
~ .C., ~ G-/~I~` ~ r? ~C l/J~ C.~ - t/ C'_C C.~/? •
b. Could li;hc or glare from the finisned project be a saiery hazard or inte: fere with
views?
D c,6S AvoT A,/~OL cf/ ,
c. What eYisun; off-site sources of lignt or gla-re may affecz your propos 1:
L!(,N i C C:j .
d Proposed measures to reduce or control lighE and glare impacz$, if any-
1?. RECFEA TIO\
a. Whaz design-ted ,Lid informal recreacional opponunicies are in Ehe immec!i ate ~icFnity?
! ! /Y7r L
b WoLld thz p; oposee p-oject c'isplacp any exis~ing recrea«onal uses) If so, descrl~e.
Spokane En~•iro~.::-:~-:_,:' O:c -:-c~! Cnec'.-:tiist Pa--
17 o-%i
, ~ ~ •
Evaiuation For
A~ency Use Only
B. EiNVIRONiNIENTAL ELl-MENTS (Continucd):
,
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacu on reci eation, including recreation
opportunities to be p: ovided by the projecz or applicant, u any:
N 0 / r/~~L 1 • .
130. HISTORIC AND CLZ.NR-~L PRESERVATIO~i
a Are there 3ny pl:.ces or objecu listed on, or proposed for, nstional, state, or local
preservation rz~~sters, known to be on or ne:ct to the site? Ii so, genera.111y desci-ibe.
b Generally descrioe a..~y landrnarks or evidence of historic, arcnaeological, scientifi c
or cultural imporance known to be on or ne:ct to the site.
IIvc T~~A„-- /v--
rl ~ o~
/.I
c Proposed measu: es to reduce or control im~acts, if ar.;
65Y
14. TRANsPORTArTONj;-
a. Identify public sz_eets :;,-id hijhways serving the site and describe proposed access
to the existing sr._ eet si*siem Snow on silz plans, if an;;
P~~~~c~:~ Ff7"
I L'~ ~Y7~IS C~Ne- .~O n Eh C rl ~ C,~ t(FLL ~/4~.L C'! tJ l~~/
TL'/fllc~~ mf,(ic:r! r` f?tE7-
/
b Is sice currend'y se:-vec by publlc Eransit) It not, wha[ 15 LPe appro:una;--e c'~iszance
to Lhe t: ;=_Sit S"SOD~
i ;
A,/ ~J
.
r-" ^Th~' Ei T,&.
Spokane 0-c,!,-_-c. C~~c~:list ~
1$ c: ;
Evaluation For
AQency Use Only
B. E"tYIRONMENTAL ELEMEYI'S (Continued):
,
c. How many parkina spaces would the completed project have? How many would che
project eliminate?
`71,00 F F.qr-,.n,T r_uiz? ,r?r~.~l
~ [12'f~,iiL~,~'
d. Will the proposal require- any new roads or sEreets, or irnprovements to e:tistin~ roads
or szreets, noC including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate wherher public
or privace).
N0 ,
e. 1`G"ill che projecL use (or occur ffn the immediace viciniry oo water, rail, or air
cransponation? If so, aenerally describe.
nD.
f. HoNv rnany vehicular trips per day zvouId be generat-d by the comple:zd projea?
If known, 1s1dIC3l° when pea~4 volumes would occu=.
1
~'F'/'u rr~,-~' P~/=~ JF,~. ,'nJ P~~
~ g Prooose-d measLres zo rzduce or conzrol transportition impacts, if any.
r~:S it,:t'`~- fiP; -~Lv ,'~.1~~'..t? f~`~ t: r j
,
13. PUBLIC SERtiZCE~
a Would the pr-ojec: r.s.,ic in an ir_creased need for puollc services (!or e•camele:
f!i e DrOLZCtion, pol:ce p: oczc~ion, healtn care, sci~ools acher)~ I~ so pne- i,-
, , a a1; descr;be.
S~P_vCc~C
Spo1:.r.e Chec'.:?'s;
P~y -
~SC 19
c: ~ ±
~ / • Evaluation For
Agency Usc Only
B. EiNVIRONMENTAL ELE:I~IEN?'S (Continucd):
,
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacu on public services, if any.
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilicies currently available at the ze: lectri/, atur gas, -ace , re~u,s~
service, t ep ne, san~cary sz~rer, sP ci~c s-- em, other.
b. Describe zhe uti-licies that are proposed for tne projecL, the utility provieing the
service, and the general conscruction accivic:es on the site or in the im~nediate vicinIry
which might be needed.
~
~ t.ECi F,I Cc iv
, - -
hse'U.-v • i/J.<~."it ,.~A.~j,^4e1T
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersi~ned, swear uneer the penal~~ of perjury that the above responses are made truthn,illy ~e to the best o'
rny knowledge. I also understand thac, should there be any wilIful misrepresentation or will{ul lack o~ ;LL1 ~~sclosL:-e
on my part, Lhe azencv I71at' w1Lhd1'3w a71y deLert111tlatlOt1 Of IlOrl-Sigil!i1CailCe that it might isst,z in rel~2LnC` Lppon t-his
Che-..k1SL. `
Date: Q-4,ru 7 20(t)
/ r
Proponent: Proponent:
(Ple=e tVpe or print) (Signature)
Address: City, State, Zip• 11t4 Phone: / 7-Z ~ /
Person completin~ the fo,. i' >
ch
~cIG
Phone ~
Sookz:ie E.-'Vlronr-:e::c: ~ O: -'_.._-c-: JisZ
Pa,-2p
_ o{2i
. ~ r
FOR STAFF USE ONLY -
Staff IVlember(s) Reviewino, Checklist:
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklis a.nd other pertinent information, the staff:
A. Concludes that there are no prooable significant acverse impacts and recommends a
iation of nonsignificanca (D~tS).
deEermn
B. Concludes that probable signifFCarit adve-se envrronment-al imp:.cu do e:cisc for the rurrenc
proposal and ; zcommends a mici~ated dete~ mination of nonsi~nificance with contlitions
C. Concludes that there are probaole significzmt adve:se environlmencal impacts and recommends
a determination of significance (DS).
REFER TO FEE SCHEDUlE FOR FILNG FT-E
Sc) okane En ~ i: on.-n en:ai 0-`cr,C'., ecst 21 ei ? 1
.
~ x':'~ ■~w.~
" SPUKANE CO IVTSION OF BUIIrDING AN6 CODE ENFOR
4 1 4 v
• 1026 WEsT BaolwwAY AvesvuE • SPOgANB, WA 99260-Q050
.
(509) 477-3675
\ 1 J
~ T
SIi'B INFORMAUON PRO~EGT INFORMA'I'ION ~
Slte Address: 13724 E NIISSION AVE Pm f ert Nuffibw. 00004450 Inv: 2 Lim Date:
Spolcerie, WA 99216 Rennit Ute: pte spp conf
Purel Namber: 45151.0914
Snbdhrisioa: UNKNOWN AgplicW: RICHARDS, BARBAR.A 30
Block: Lot 12500 E EUCLID AVE
Zonine: IJNK UnknAwn SPOKANE, WA 99216-1296 Phona (509) 783-0566
Owner: RICH[ARDS, BARBARA 30 Conbct- gandy RiggR
7810 S. Fineview Len+e
Addreii: 12500 E EUCLID AVE gpQ]ane, WA 99206 Phone: (509) 891-1733
SPOKANE, WA 99216-1296
I~etbsdu - Fruu~ Ldft Rfght: Rrar:
Inspat.or: DAN HOWARD
Water Dist:
Group Npme: amk
Projat Nama
t PEDAT(g) )
Cm + 1 Uae Coatnt~eor: l.tcauc a:
ENVI&ONMANTAI, jtHVIEW V75.00 M+If3IlVEBR ABVIBW 350.00
CONDITIONAL U8E pERMTT S422.00
Totsl Permit Fee: S547.00
~ PAYMFN!' StTMMARY Nc 1 oi t NoTEs ~
PERMiT Prowsed By:
PrintBd By: WE~TDEL, CtLORIA
Tran ate ~~w pt,0 EammtAmt -
06/13/2000 4727 S547.00
Igl.~m Aou~._ AaMp~~
$547,00 $547.00 $0.00
~
a o
` Spokane County
Public Works Deptxrtinent
Divison of Building & Placnning
Receipt
,
Receipt Number: 4727 Customer Number
Projects
Full
Pro{ect Nbs Inv 1Vbr FeeAmt lnu~,,t owiu PAID Pmt
00004450 2 $547.00 $547;00 $547.00 ~
,
Total: $547.06 ,$5~;00. $547.00
Miscellaneous Itema
~
a'otal PAID: $547.00
Tender
7~pe Check ; Acct Balnnee-,C'C Ddte TEIVDERED
, .
~
CF1EGkl 404'F^, 547.00
- • -r ,
Total TENDERED: 547,00
Over /(Short) $0,00
Claange $0.00
Noles:
Tran Date / 7Yme: 06l13/2000 9:57:16 AM
By: FHintr
Logon User: gwendei
Station: GWENDEi.
Override By:
Printed: 0611312000 9:57:19AM Page 1 of 1
i q
i F
- ~
f - . + ' T ~ •I , - . . a.
~
. ~ . , ~ . a.
! . .
s c
. y 1 ~ 7?~, ~ . . ~ ,i'y~;ti., ~ r, 'l;;~Nr~ a q _~,.^t~x,y<. ~ . ~'4~'"~'~ ~'~►-~5~+~
SL.-;.`'.
.
~ ~ . ~i. . . . ~
. . . . ~ - . ~ . , - • . ~ . .
~
~ A a., . . . .
✓ ` - ' ~ ~ r. ~ Y~ 6
. ~ '
` , . , ~ Y" t. Y ~ ,
~ ~ • c~; 'r~
.
~
• `
t - ~ ' . ~ t. ~ ~ •
k ~1 .,~3nNP• - z , ~ ' '
, <<~ , ~
..r ~ .
.
qr
~
_ , - ~ ~1.~.. ~ . " K~~ 't -
! 1 35 - ~~1 ~ ~ ~~F~ - ~ * j,~~`',~~ a ~ ~ •t
~
C~ ~ • ~ ~
' - ~ w ~ ~ 1 ~ i ~ • •
f
t" A t
' f~;:
,
~
~
~
,
iex
V O y
~ t O
~ N
~
~ I ~ •
N
~
~
IY
u
99 V 00*
0
CUE-11-00
Vicinity Map
Y. ,
~
00,
r► Ilnii~~~ri~~
02
I
~
. 1bbeau Pk A Euchd
~ 6.
'If Illr I
~ i
I'" I
IJI~~F
- '1I11►• I
I / ~
~
a ~~~~'~'•.`~~(~'~~•~n~nrrir -nr~~il
~ I ('J~~~~♦
rGki
~ ~ agc 10 M~ncfield ( ~ ~ ~
i
. ~~.wn^^_•--- , i
ML
IJ~14 1
Nor~ I
~ '
~ ~ IA1+ruPll '
Santn CD ~ trnrn
~ E S $96,
~
E, C G ~
n."
U/ T~` 1 dQ
~ r + ~C~;L1(S}+ ~ C ~
a ~ Mal ~1al an ~latl+-i
c ~
b~ ~v~lli
fm.adwa.Y ~ BRIY~QV
f C 3~b' a gpnngfiekf S(xtpY-
ale.. ~ All~ N
U > ~ > I AI~ A11a °
14
u
. 011.r ; olln LLI
s
y
r ' 4 r ~ l ~ ~ -~Ixft`
Nixon
~ yfa~U ~ ~1 c ~ ~ 5
~ t J ~ ~ r A1y •
T ~ly ~
- Ri~.-madr
~ Rrv~-rede ~ `,e ~ '
~ Riv~tS ~ € ~ 'L3i ? Rl%astdc
7- ¢t Crrn¢ue
- c_...
~
~ Y, 1 si
a7
r--,a
x~ Q z~ z,~ r ~ 2 ; }
~ ~ ~
7 ~ rJ' ~ u
~i
Ah-
~
Scale 1 mch -1500 ft 06/15/00 Vcinity Map
ROAD 11 ~
GRAVEL
1
yl ' _
1 I'
QI
+
BUNN to
NOUSE to_ 1
S 77° 30' E ~
RES
(vaCl
MISSION AVE. EXT *IVEGAS
NT
~ BpA~ I I
~ ' ~ ~ ~ x
0 1 / ' t
OD FEED
PLE
ELµ ELni
SMED Iol
F Cf~ S
C~)~ EN + YARD
ti W • N LIGHT
1 t
t
i ~
~ I 1 A (
46+99.90 I
12°38
634 24 ~
L= 1263 32 0
~ a
~ Z
W
~ W
0:
a
~ W
COµC 7
~ r opIVE r uJ
~ 1 I
' 1 \.J
1
V j7
~ , , C~~er ycee~~
27 Z7-
P CI~ ~
c eS~~
~oVe w t~~
S 5 ,
s
~ os s ►h ~ s . o p e~ ~c~
s ~.oWS o.~
CC ~e.~~ceNC~ ~-O
NeceSSoa10~
~ ~
~ c~s~~►~~~" ~
o
P e ~
i
~ d
Raad ;e r ~ 72
/
~
~ ` } ~ 1
I •~~1 ~.5 6 6 `
r V~
ID
~
. ; IVI
U N I~
0
Aft 'kc-s ~
r. ~ _
~
~IL}
-
o ~ a
~ ~
~ f
C tzP- 27 2,? '
~
~
Y
~ " ~ •
FiGRD~
. ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ o~ -
~
~ ~
A/r E
o ToV ~to 7-0
T co
Roor,, 14.
~ C 6 "1 -ItR
0 .~ue c.
3', M ~SS40~'`~
TU 1 z~ ~,n,, ~ SS t4'`~
' S
~ &
R ~,.t~ -
vwpw4
I 1 ~ ~J P
LIA
~ - R~ ~ • 1 ~,A~~`' ;
COWD
cz
N
~..•~r ~
/
~~SStQt~.1 T~►~ '
So
_ , ' REC4
MO_
~ ~ ► ~1 :'P0~'' ~ nl ~ ~ CSG D
S
M ~
,s~s~o►~ ~
~ fi ,o
Q sue.~ ~ pLA4~~N~ < < ~
~ ~
i0~ /
Vvts . ~
~
~
~Rt3a~A`~ - - ~