The URL can be used to link to this page

VE-19-90 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPEAL OF THE ZONING ADJUSTOR'S ) AUGUST 91,1990 DECISION IN THE ) MATTER OF A VARIANCE FROM FRONT ) AND FLANKING STREET YARD ) FINDINGS OF FACT, REQUIREMENTS ) CONCLUSIONS, [VE-19-90] JOHN R. ADRIAN ) AND DECISION COMPANION FILES: NONE ) ADDRESS: E. 7708 SOUTH RIVERWAY PARCEL NUMBER: 06543-2234 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to locate a new dwelling unit (after demolishmg the exisang dwelling) to wnthin 40.25 feet of the nght of way centerluie of South Riverway (front yard) and to within 32 25 feet of Center Road, (flanlang street yard), whereas, sections 4 OS 110 a 1 and 3 of the Spokane County Zonmg Ordinance requums nespectively a minunum 55 feet and 45 feet from the centerhne of those nghts of way Authonty to consider such a request exists pursuant to Secnon 4 25 030b of the Spokane County Zonmg Ordinance PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located on the southeast comer of South Riverway and Center Road, m the SW 1/4 of Secaon 6, Townslup 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washmgton, addressed as E 7708 South Riverway PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideranon of all available informaaon on file, exhibrts subnutted and testunony r+eceived dunng the course of the pubhc heanng held on November 21,1990, and the Board of Adjustment rendered a wntten decision on December 19, 1990 to APPROVE the application FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1 The proposal is generally descnbed above According to the site plan wtuch has the required and requested setbacks marked in red, the existing house is in substantial violauon with the present zonmg setback regulaaons The new dwelling unit would be a lesser violaaon on the flanlang street (Center Road) and a greater violation on South Riverway (the front yard) Construcdon wnthin the requu-ed setbacks from both streets, particularly when the streets intersect at less than a 90 degree angle, is virtually impossible, certainly presenang "pracacal difficulaes " The septic tank drainfield is located parnally on the lot adjoining to the east, but the applicant states that an easement has been acquued for that sepac tank Part of the exisnng drainfield is shown beneath the exisang house An unproved or alternative drainfield situauon will lilcely be worked out with the Health Distnct Any such solution should try to avoid the placement of any drainfield underneath the dnveway for the existing garage (into which area the drainfield now extends) 2 The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Pldn designates the area of the proposal as Urban The proposed uses are generally consistent with this category r ~ . ~ CASE NO VE-19-90 SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PAGE 2 3 The site is zoned Agncultural Suburban, which allows the proposed use upon approval of this applicaaon The lot is a presently m conformance wnth the rrnnimum standards of the Zone 4. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include relaavely small to medium lot development, all of which are compatible with the proposal 5. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State Envimnmental Pohcy Act, Chapter 43 21 C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b) 6 The apphcant has been made aware of the recommendations of vanous County agencies reviewuig this project The applicaat found no particular problems vnth any of the agency recornmend recommendations, except those of the County Engineer The County Engineer has recommended that 7 75 feet of land be dedicated on both South Riverway and Center Road The Enguieer's Office is trying to establish the addiaonal pomoa of the half nght-of-way wluch would bnng these respecave mdes of the street to a 25 foot half nght-of- way in an effort to eventually estabhsh a 50 foot nght-of-way stneet standard, as is requued by the Board of County Comnussioner"s adopted regulaaons The apphcant objects to this much land being dedicated from a small parcel, stating that the present streets are enarely adequate for the area and that no addstionai nght-of-way for future expansion is needed. After evaluaang these two opposing points of view, the Zoning Adjustor concludes that the street standards reqtunng a nununum of a 50 foot nght-of-way ar+e consistent wnth adopted County Ordmances, wluch the Enguieer's recommendaaons are attempting to unplemenL Therefore, the dedicaaon of 7 75 feet for both fronnng streets will be imposed as a cond.iaon of approval 7. The proper legal requirements for advernsing of the heanng before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met 8 No adverse tesamony or wntten comments were received regar+ding the proposal 9 With the con(inons of approval set forth below, the vanance will a) not constitute a grant of special pnvileges inconsistent wnth hmitaaons on other propemes in the vicinity and sunilar zone, b) ensure that the intent and purpase of the Zoning Ondmance is achieved vrnth regard to locaaon, site design, appearance, and landscaping, etc, and c) protect the envuonment, pubhc interest and general welfare 10 The County engineer routnely recommends that vanous land use acaons tngger dedicadons or future nght-of-way acquisiaons sufficient to bnng adjacent road nght-of-ways up to rrununum County standards Vanous land use hearmg bodies routYnely requm such recommendaaons as condiuons of approval 11 Granting the vanance will be neither matenally detnmental to the pubhc welfare nor injunous to property or unprovements in the vicinity and zone 12 Stnct applicaaon of the zoning standards does create an unr+easonable burden in light of the purpose to be served by the standards 13 The case for the vanance was not supported by substannal reference to or reliance upon illegal or non-conforming precedent(s) • r CASE NO VE-19-90 SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADNSTMENT PAGE 3 ~ 14. Grannng the vanance wnll not adversely affect the overall zoning design, plan or concept for either the imme(hate area or the entm Counry 15. The case for a vanance was not based substannally upon a lack of reasonable econonuc return nor a claim that the existing structure is too small 16 The pracacal difficulty which gives nse to the vanance request chd exist before the present owner acquued the property 17 Vanous perforniance standards and cntena are additionally needed to make the use compaable with other pernutted activities in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public unlities and these shall be addressed as condiaons of approval DECISION From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the pr+oposal, subject to compliance with the followuig CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. GENERAL 1 The followuig conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in interest and shall run wnth the land. 2. Failur+e to comply with any of the condiaons of approval contained in this decision, except as may be reheved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall consatute a violaaon of the Zoning Ordinance and be subject to such enforcement as is appropnate 3 The Zorung Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or the condhtions of approval as may be judged to be withun the context of the ongmal decision II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 The new dwelhng structure should be located as far east and south as possible, in order to maxunize the front and flanking street sctbacks, pamcularly in light of the nght-of-way dedications 2 The Planning Department shall venfy that plans for the new construcuon indicate at least the approved setbacks with respect to approved roadway centerline measurements or comparable property line setback, pnor to any dedicanon of nght-of-way , . . CASE NO VE-19-90 SFOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PAGE 4 ~ III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY 1 The issuance of a buildzng pernvt by the Department of Building and Safety is requued IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1 Any water service for ttus project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane Counry, as amended 2. The new dwelluig utut shall be double-plumbed for connection to future areawide collection systerns V. HEALTH DTSTRICT 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County 2. Water service shall be coordinated through the D=ctor of Uahties Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be by an exisdng pubhc water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Deparnnent of Soaal & Health Sernces 4 Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently protubited Preferably, the drainfield should not be located where it would be paval over if a dnveway were installed 5 Subject to specific apphcanon approval and issuance of pernuts by the health officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage d.isposal system(s) may be authonzed The Distnct needs to approve the use of the existing or modified disposal system or approve a totally new system VI. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1 An approach permit must be obtained from the Counry Engineer pnor to the construcnon of any new dnveway approaches This must be done pnor to the release of a building pernuL 2. The applicant shall deiicate a applicable radhus on Center Road and South Riverway Avenue NOTICE PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED T0 BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMTTS MAY BE R:ELF.ASED PRIOR TO TBE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND . . , CASE NO VE-19-90 SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PAGE 5 INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLIGANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL DATED this 19th day of December, 1990 Vote 4-0 Unanunous BOARD OF ADNSTTUNT ("00 OF SPOKANE COUNTY ASHINGT4N P fD-wight me, airman Paul Eichui E B Hamblin Vernon F Laubach FII.ED 1) Apphcant (CernfiedlReturn Receipt Mail) 2) Spokane County Engineer's Office 3) Spokane County Health Ihstnct 4) Spokane County Ualities Department 5) Spokane County Department of Builduig & Safety 6) Spokane County Fue Protection Dismct No 1 7) Plannuig Department C:ross-reference File and/or Electromc File NOTE• ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPFONENT OF RECORD MAY FII.E AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$100 00 FEE APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Sections 4 25 090 and 4 25 100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance) RECEIVED AUG 1 0 1990 ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE GOt1NTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF A VARIANCE FROM ) FRONT AND FLANKING STREET YARD ) FINDINGS OF FACT, REQUIREMENTS ) CONCLUSIONS, [VE-19-90] JOHN R. ADRIAN ) AND DECISION COMPAr1ION FII.ES: NONE ) ADDRESS: E. 7708 SOUTH RIVERWAY PARCEL NUMBER: 06543-2234 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: Ihe applicant proposes to locate a new dwelling unit (after demohshing the eausang dwellwg) to within 40.25 feet of the nght of way centerhne of South Riverway (firont yard) and to withm 32 25 feet of Center Road, (flanlang street yard), whereas, sections 4.05.110 a 1. and 3. of the Spokane County Zorung Ordinance reqwres respectively a minmmwm 55 feet end 45 feet from the centerluie of those nghts of way. Authonty to consider such a request exists pwsuant to Section 4.25.030b. of the Spokane County Zoning Ordnianve. PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located on the southeast corner of South Riverway and Center Road, in the SW 1/4 of Section 6. Townslup ZS N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WashmgZon, ~u~dr~essed as E 7708 South Riverway. OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all avadable information on file, exhibits submitted and te,samony received dunng the cotuse of the pubhc heanng held on July 16,1990, and the Zoning Adjustar rendered a wntten decision on August 9,1990 to APPROVE the apphc~on. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal is generally descnbed above. Accordsng to the sit,e plan which has the required and requested setbarcks marked in red, the elnsting house is m substanaal violatron wnth the pre$ent zonuig setback regulations. The new dwelluig umt would be a lesser violadon on the flanlang street (Center Road) and a greater violaaon on South Riverway (the front yard) Constiuction within the reqinred setbacks from both samts, paracularly when the stneets intersect at less than a 90 degc+oe angle, is vutually inipossible, certainly presenang "pmcacal d~fficulties." The septic tank drainfield is lvcated partially on the lot adjrnning to the east, but the apphcant states that an essement has been acquurd for that septic tank Part of the existing drainfield Ls shown beneath the eansting house. An unproved or alternative drainfield situaaon will lilcely be worked out wnth the Health DistncL Any such soluaon should try to avrnd the placement of any drainfield undeaneath the dnveway for the existing garage (into which area the drainfield now extends). 2. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the proposal as Urban. The proposed uses are generally consistent wnth this category . CASE NO. VE-19-90 SPOK;ANE COUNTY ZONIIVG ADNS'POR PAGE 2 m a 3 The site is zoned Agncultural Suburban, wluch allows the proposed use upon approval of dus apphcsaon. The lot is a pre5endy in confarmance vvith the nummum standaids of the Zone. 4. The eustrng Iand uses in the area of the progosal include relatively sanall to medium lot dewelopment, all of wluch are compatible with the proposal 5. The proposal is exempt from the provmons of the Washuigton State Envuonmental Policy Act, Chapter 43 21C RCW pursuant w WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b). 6 The apphcant has been made aware of the rocommendaaons of vanous County agencies reviewmg this project. The apphcant found ao paracular problems vcnth any of the agency rocommend recommendations, except tho5e of the County Engrneer. The County Engineer has r'xommended that 7.75 feet of land be dedicated on both South Riverway and Center Road. The Engineees Office is tzying to establish the additional pordon of the half right-of-way wluch would bnng these respecave sides of the street to a 25 foot half nght-of- way in an effort to evendially estabhsh a 50 foot nght-of-way srwt standand, as is mquued by the Board of County Comnnssionefs adoptiod regulations. The apphcant objects to tlus much land beuig dedicated fro~n a snudl parcel, stating that the present streets are entirely adequate for the area and that no additionai nght-of-way for futune expansion is needed. After evaluating these two opposing pouits of view, the Zonu,g Adjustor concludes that the street standards requiring a minunuai of a SO foot nght-of-way are consistant with adopted County Oniinances, which the Engineees r~xoinr~endations are attempttng to unplement. Therefore, the dedication of 7.75 feet far both fronting stwts will be imposed as a condition of approval. 7. The praper legal requirements far advertising of the hearmg before the Zonuig Adjustar of Spokane County have been met 8. No advease testimony or written coaunents were recetved regarrhng the proposal. 9. With the condinons of appmval set forth below, the varmnce will. a) not constitute a giant of special pnvileges ncoesistent with hmitations on other propernes m the vicuuty and sunilar zone; b) eusure that the intent and pwrpose of the Zonuig Ordinanoe is achieved with regand tio location, site design, aPpearance, and landscapmg, etc, and c) protect the environment, pubhc int+erest and general welfare. 10. Z'he County engineer routinely recommends that vanous land use acaons tngger dedicaaons ar future nght-of-way aoquisiaons sufficient to bnng adjacent road nght-of-ways up to nunimum County standards. Various land use hearmg bodies routinely requm such recommendauons as condiaons of approval. 11. Cnanting the vanance will be neither matenally detnmental to the pubhc welfare nor injunous to pmperty or unprovements iu the vicuuty and zone 12. Stnct apphcaaon of the zomg standards dces create an unreasonable burden in ught of the purpose to be seived by the standards . ~ CASE NO. VE-19-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ?ANING ADNSI'OR PAGE 3 13. The case far die vanance was not supported by substantul reference tio or reliance upon illegal or non-oonforming pmedent(s). 14 Granting the variance will not adveisely affect the overall zomng design, plan or concept for elther the imrnediat,e area ar the entire County. 15. The case for a venanoe wss not based substanmlly upon a lwk of reasonable eoonomic retum nor a claim that the existing structure is too small. 16. T!e pmcacal difficulty which gives nse tio the vanance roquest did exist befoe the present owner aoquuvd the pr+operty. 17. Vanous performance sltandards and cntena are addiaonally needed to make the use compaable with other permitted activities in the same vwmity and tione and to ensure against unposing exvessive demands upon pubhc utilities and these shall be arddressed as conditions of approval. DECISION Fmm the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the proposal, subject to comphance with the following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL L GENERAL 1. 7he following conditions shall apply to the applicant, ownea and successors in mterrest and shall rtui with the land. 2. Failute tio comply wnth any of the conditions of appmval conuined in ttus decimon, except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zoning 4rduiance aad be subject to such enforoement as is appropna~e 3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make urinor adjustaaeents to site pLm or the eonditions of appmval as may be judged to be within the vontext of the origuial decision. II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The new dwelling structune should be located as far east and south as possible, m order to maximize the front and flanking stwt setbacks, pamcularly in hght of the nght-of-way dedicauons. 2. The Planiung Depwrtment shall venfy that plans for the new oonsaucaon indicate at least the approved setbaccks with respecx to appmved roadway centerhne measurements or comparable property hne setback, pnar to any dedicaaon of nght-of-way 1 ' . . CASE NO VE-19-90 SPOK:ANE COUN'I'Y 7ANIIVG ADNSTOR PAGE 4 M. DEPARTMENT OF BUII.DING & SAFETY 1. The issuance of a buildung perncnt by the Department of Budchng and Safety is requmd IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systiems is hereby authonzed. T7us authonzation is condsaoned on compliance wnth all rules and regulmons of the Spokane County Health District and is further conchtioned and subject tio specific applicanon approval and issuance of perruts by the Health Distnct. 2 Any water service for this pr+oject shall be provided in accardance with the Coordiaated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. The new dwelluig utut shall be double•plumbed for connecaon to future areawide collecaon systems V. HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Du+ectar of Udlities, Spokane County. 2. Water seivioe shall be coordinated dunugh the Duector of Ualiaes Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be by a/an eaasting/new pubhc water supply when approved by the Regional Enguieer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services. 4. Disposai of sewage elfluent beneath paved surfaces Ls cuaendy prohilnted. Preferably, the drauifield should not be located where it would be paved over if a dnveway were installed. 5. Subject to specific applicaaon approval and issuance of peracuts by the health offiver, the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system(s) may be authontied. The Distnct needs to appmve the use of the existing or mochfied disposal system or approve a totaUy new systein. VI. SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1. An appro~ch permt must be obtuned fmm the County Engineer pnor to the construcaon of any new dnveway approaches Tlus must be done pnor to the release of a builduig peimnt, 2 Apphcant shaU sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 6 wluch specu''ies the followmg• r ~ CASE NO VE-19-90 SFOKANE COUNTY ZANIIVG ADNS'POR PAGE 5 The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree tio authonze the County to place theu name(s) on a petiaon for the fonmation of a Road Imprnvement Distnct (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chaptier 36 88 RCW, which petition mcludes the owner(s) propeity, and further not to object, by the signmg of a ballot, the fomnation of a RID by the resoludon method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, wlvch resolution includes the owner(s) property. If an RID is foimed by either the petiaon or resoluaan method, as pmvided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or suocessor(s) further agree• (1) that the mpovement or constniction contemplated vvithin the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits Lo be denved from the foranation of the RID by the property mcluded themn, mgether wnth the amount of any County parncipaaon, exveeds the vost and expense of fozmation of the RID, and (3) that the property mndun the proposed RID is sufficiendy developed. Provided further that the owner(s) ar successor(s) shall retaan the nght, as authonzed under RCW 36.88.0909 to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the nnprovements called for in oonjunction anth the fo~rmanon of the RID by eithea petition oz resoluaon method uader Chapter 36.88 RCW This reqwremnt apphes to South Riverway Avenue vr Centeer Road whichever the subject parcel takes acx;ess. 3. Applicant shall dedicate 7.75 feet on Center Road for right-of-way. 4. Apphcant shall dedicate 7.75 feet on South Riverway far nght-of-way. 5. The apphcant shall dedicate a apphcable radius an Center Road aund South ltiverway Avenue. NO'I'ICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VVFIICH NEED TO BE COWIETED PRIOR TO PERNIIT ISSUANCE, PE;RNIITS MAY BE RELEASID PRIOR TO TIHE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER, TI-E COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXP'ENSES AND INCO CE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJEGT APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERID UFON APPEAL. DATED this 9th day of August,1990 G • . ' THOMAS G. MOSHER, AICP ~ Zonuig Adjustor Spokane County, Washuigton FILID: 1) Apphcant (Certified/Return Receipt Mail) ^8 R CASE NO. VE-19-90 SFOK:ANE COUNTY 7ANIIVG ADNSTOR PAGE 6 a 2) Spokane County Enguieer"s Office 3) Spokane County Health Ihstnct 4) Spokane County Utihties Departiment S) Spokane County Department of Btnlding 8t Safety 6) Spokane County Fu+e Protecaon District No. l 7) Planning Department Oossrreference F'ile and/or Electromc F'~le NOrI'E: ONLY 1THE APPI.ICANT OR AN OPFONENT OF RECC)RD MAY FILE AN APPEAL VVMIIN TEN (10) GAI.FNDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNIIVG. APP'EAL MUST BE ACGOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT TBE SFOK;ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTZVIENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUII.DING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STRF.ET, SFOK:ANE, WA 99260 (Secaons 4 25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoaing Ordinance) c ' J t`~it 4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9ROAOWAV CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEiRERSCN STREET PMONE '~6-2205 SPOKANE, WASMINGTpN 99260 SPaMAN[ COUNTr CpYRT MOUb[ BEFDRE THE SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHIIVGTON IN TM MAITF.R OF APPEAL OFTHE ZONNG ) NOri'I(E AWUMRS DEaSION T0 APPROVE A ROAD OF FRONI'AGE VARIANCE ) OpTTIIINUAN(;E F'aeNumber. VE-19-90 The above entided matter(s) coming on regularly for bearing beforc the Bosrd of Adjustment of Spokana Conaty, Washungton, and the Board of Adjnstment for lack of a quonim. did determine to continae this bearing to ~ ~tJ9& .2/ 9: 40"90( ,in the Broadwsy Cantre Buildiag Hearing Room, N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spolcsne, Washiqgm, on I;L / 1990, DATED THIS 17TH DAY QF O(,'POBF.tt,1990 ~ DWIC3 `Spokane County Board of Adjustment , I ToM/jh ~ 7 _ l (D Ci r~` ) / ~ V , • r- EilrJq. F'ermit F"ee Ncl. Fi.le No. Pr o.j ect IVame / Ad ci resS Farce 1 Nct. 6 C13 , Sponsqr ~ s Name _ Ph-'?f1P # ~!1 Gzrrc~.~. ~.nqineer/Surveyc~r s/Arcf~~.tec't s ~~7ZN/ "Aie Telephone # F1 ann i ng t:cmtact Rer san natP Submitted Descr ipt ion Init ials . ' • . ~ • . i i , • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~I BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFCnu c accT P►+ONE 456-2205 RECEIVED SPOKANE, WASFIINGTON 9926' JUN 2 2 1990 SPOKANE COUNiY GOURT HOUSC SPOKANE COtlNTY ENGINEER IYCTIIC1L OIP' SPOK"IL ~OUN'II'Y 7LOlYIINQa AIIDSUSTOIR PUBILIIC IHIIEAIlBIIRTG DATE: July 16,1990 TIME: 2:30 p.m, or as soon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department 2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Building North 721 Jefferson Street Spokanc, WA 99260 AGENDA ITEM 5 File: YE-19-90 VARIANCE FROM FRONT AND FLANKIN = STREET REOUIREMENTS: L O C A T I O N: Located on the southeast corner of South Rivcrway and Center Road, in the SW 1/4 of Section 6, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington; addressed as E 7708 South Riverway. . P R O P O S A I.: Applicant requests a new residence be located 40.25 feet from South Riverway's right of way centerline (front yard) and 32.25 feet from Center Road's right of way centerlinc (flanking street yard) whereas, sections 4.05.110 a. 1. and 3. of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance require respectively a minimum 55 foot setback and 45 foot setback from the centerline of these roadway right of ways. EXISTINC ZONING: Agricultural Suburban ('OMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban SL1B.lECT SITE SIZE: Approximately 8,450 square feet APPLICANT John R. Adrian East 7708 South Riverway Spokane WA 99212 ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS MAY BE HEARD FIRST, POSSIBLY CAUSING DELAYS. LEGAL DFSCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILES. APPEALS OF THE DECISION ON THE ABOVE LISTED CASE MAY ONLY BE FILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD ACCOMPANIED BY A $100.00 FEE. (Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinancc.) . D • . 1 . SPOKANE COVNa a PLANNING DEPARTMU rr rjnICATIoxs sEFoRE nig zoivIIVa Certificate of Excn3ptioa No.: ,,Applicstion No.: Narac of Applicaat: ~ -Agcat: Y N Strcet Address: LD0JCUUJk\,_ 1`~ ,,.3 • Zip ~ Phone - Homc:_SO?-qz 7• ~a~ City: State:_~~D~- Code: l work: iia-rn C.- Agants No. Nacno of Proparty Owrur(a): Sve':t gddrAv L I I O~.Kp_: Y~7Sf . 1_ ~ ~"i : 't 1 f': -SS .a 1. ~ - J , - Zip - F''xs ou~: - HOu7'iz:. ZZ' _YVV4 c:icy:~ State:.JJ:.6, Code: 2t7Qi_;;1 Work: REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Ctrcle sppropriste action): :arianca(s) Conditionsl Uae Periait Nonconfrrmtng Lot/Usc , a.var o olstion Temporary Uae/Structure Other: . FOR t"1_'AFF USE ONLY CODB: ORDINANCE lations Section(s): 0 Q,,d 4~~r. Cite RaSu Proper,~ ~~Violation/Enforcement: ~Sectioa:Towaship: ~r Range: Siie: ~S Y N Existing Zono: Comp. Plaa Des.: ao'~O Crossover a/Q I.EC3AL G~ PSSA'GN TA NASA0 N FIRE DIST.;~CHEC'KED BY - /~o 9 Hearing Datc: Persoanel Taking In Application: _ _ x Existing Usc of Ptoperty:~ , n . ~ Describe Intcnded Pm?osal in Terms of REQUESTED AMON" 01wtUirq- ~LI+k a►N Cl- Qn _r'MLL,~a,~-bac~1..,. ' _ Z ~ c4 L. ~ Strcct Addrasa of Proporty:_ o V:~o(a`~'~ qsr(,Oa. ~ Legal Dcscriptioa of P7MA y (iaclude essement, if applicabla): - D A oc A dA -P-- - r ~ w65 F+ -Lxs- s I oo -F-f- (31AF . v~ J Parcel No(s)4Ca,:5-413 'a24-23 Source of Lega1:~5~~¢ Total amount of adjoining land controlled by thia owner/sponsor: /44- What ;intorest do you hold in the property?__Q wAQr Pleas.e list prcvious Plan.aing Dcpartmcat actions involving this propcrty: I S VVEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PIItJURY, THA,'I': (1) IAM T'HE OWNER OF RECORD OR A" t_~ f: i~*'~' FO:: ~::~.`::a~ ST'f"t,; ('`L} IH' ~ ~10rT WRn-nEN ^ ~ ''HE O'~VP1"r.R, PER~'vi.1SSIrJN FROM &AID OVVNER AU'Y'HORIZING MY ACTTONS ON HIS/liER BEHAi.F IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESFONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING EST OF MY KI~jOWLEDGE. D` ARE NiADE TR[TIHF[JI.I.Y ANP77 y Sigricd• ~°SH'~!~:~~'!~ Addres o~ Phone ' No.: Datc:-,5 . NOT Y~~ Notary: • ~ ~ Datc: ~ Z` . y ~ OI~RY Page 3 of 4 (Ovor) Reviscd 3-4-88 . ' ~ A. BIJRDEN - It is nthc applicant or his/ber rcprescntativo to establish ~5c rcasons „r,hy ~AGTION should bc approvcd and to liurally put forth :hc basic casc ~cFor- fi~~~~'y should havc bccn givaa a foizv for your requestod action (va ~ re;-' o~ u8~ etc.) dcsignad to bclp you piesent your case in a way wh~fh Wdress tht :c na which the Zoning Adjustor must coasider. Pleasc fill ~ tha lona% out and ret,' ~it with your application. If you did not gct a form, ask thc Planaing Dcpartincnt~rsoancl for advica on how to procccd. - ~~~I ~h•OFF '1,)f,0 1NTY HE LTH DISTRICT / . $ ) Proposcd mc:hod of ~vatcr svrr'.y:_r- b) Proposcd mcthod of scwagc disposal:_v,r_j,~~~. A prclimi consu tioa hsa bccn hcld to discuaa thc proposal. 'thc appiicant as e f irements aad standards. (Sig at re) (Datc) (Sign-off Waived) JP_s,lNTY ENGINEERING DEP~RTMENT A prcliminary consultation has bccn bcld to discuss thc proposal. Tha applicant has bcca informcd of requiremcnts and standsrds. l ` 1e, ~ _ ~ (Signature) (Datc) (Sign-off Waivcd) ~OCJNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (VYaivc if outsidc VVMAB) A praliminary consultation hu beaa beld to discusa the proposal. The applicant as be n informed of requircmeau and stan rd . ~ - jj ~a-~l~~r ~/a m ~ ~ 'Signsture) (Date) (Sign-off Waivad) l l 'fbn sppli ~aat ;s roq.C-r. d x d:R:-nR:: Lj:.e ~)Fnnusal witb to bocoano iafo.nicd oa' c; ct!!ro rcquiretecnt: aad standard:. Tbc spplicant is requircd to discuss tbe proposal with to become iaformcd of :ewsge disposal rcquiremeat: and standard:. (9WATER PURVEYORi ~(Waive lf outa~de CWSSA) a) Thc propossl ocstcd within the boundary of our future :ervice srea. b) Thc proposal located withia t6a boundary of our curnat diatrict. c) Wc "are not able to serva is sita witb adequatt wstet. beea made to serva tbis vei d) Satiafactory angementa prop 1. . /f c o~ 9~1 ( S i g n s~u te ) (D ate) (S,ign-off W aivad) ~ S. UWER&GE EURVE.XM (If other tban Spokane County; preliminary consultstion bsa bei-m hcld to discuss the :apbsr./. Thc applicsot has beca informed of requircmen sn andards. , (Signnturc) (Date) (S' -a~ff Waived) Pagc 4 of 4 r .-•r • • . . . , . 2 . { r ' . _ I „ `'~I. . . . . . . . . s 1 ; . . . APPI ICJi1NT' S FCRM . - . _ - E. . 1 ~I at NAM FILE: 1. YARIANGES _ A. Wi 1~ the vari a e uthvri ze a use atherwi se prohi bi ted i n thi s z4ne? Yes ; Nv ; Cmm+ent: , _ R ' . . . . i.. . . . ' . 1 -y . . ' . , . _ . . r " . . . y 8. W111 specisi circvmstancea ~a 11cable ta the ra art (such as size, shape, tapograPhY, svrroundings wen CamSne he standards af thtlontng 4rdinancee create practical di1`ficvlties far use of the property sndlar depri ve ~e Y~ raR~ ~Y~nd si rights 1ar n zone i as9i si cati~a~►~ ta ather prop+~rti es i n t Ys s ; No ; Coment : r7~ T t'c( .dr 4 Ct . C. Will the genting v1 th+~ rar~ienct bo mattrially dt#rimental to th• pub11C re artit or injurious to property ar impravewnts in the _ ricinfty and zane? Yes ; NO Co~naents: ` . . _ . , . • i ; `.fl~'l-"'" 0. Goes strict application of the toning standard treatt 4n unressanaole burden i n 1 i 9ht of purposs to be slrve,d by the standardY Yes bk Ka ; Coortnt; , - E. Wvul d rel axatlon of the zani ng standard makt a mort env1 rvmental ly sensi tivt ar energy-consarvi ng project or tnc age cQntinued or now • ~ usr of an histvrte property3 Yes ; Na ; Coment: . ~ F. Wil 1 a broad+er, publie netd or i nteres be served by Qrantlnq trerse denyi ng the v4riance? Yes ; No Coment: , . ilirTtr'" "4 G. Is the'-cas~r:..;._ i.or . u i, t="- rari.anc e"~supp"_ , rorted by 11ke or - vther ~s~ situativns in the rri ci ni ty and i n simi l ar zones? Yes ; No ; Caament: , (continued on reverse side) , • . ' ~ ~ . , ~ , . r H. Mt l l granti ng the variance adversely affect the overall zoni ng desi gn, p1 an or concept for ei ther the immediate area or the entire County? Y!i ~ NO C0mE11L: 2n ~-t~.~ cw,~ ~:a.~ fc.~ ~ous~e.s ~ort so~.-~-~• . i On Gr~ ~ I ~ GJF~~'~~ qu~s On • C1~Sr 4-" QrQ I ~ . , i, is the case for a vaAance substantially based upon a lack of reasonable econaai return or a clatm that the ex1 sting structure i s Wo tull? yes j No j Commnti ~t-w V~Q.4C ~A - •'t i . Y f / G. f 5 O. J. w111 granti n the lart ance be 1 nconsi stent r+1 th the gener,l purpose and 1ntent ol the Coivrehenstve P1an? Yes ; No ; Comment: - , 4 ..i . " ~ . . t 7~ . _ , . • , , i . . . . . . • . ~ K. Oi d the practl Ca1 di f fi tul ty whith 9i res ri se to the vari ance request exist beforethe property wa: acquired y the:pre:tnt owner? Yes . ~NO Camment: ir6oxy . 0_5 e rev f n C• . e rsAlUr~ iS a~VA 6 5 i ~C, o~_ Le1' nC<`" ~ o r . w111 the 9rantlnqY ot 'the varl&nc* result tn defaCto =one rectasstfica- tion; that, i s. tf~e tstabl i shi ng ot nearly a11 the pri vi1 e9es comon to a-di f ferent zona c1 a ssi fi cati on? Yes ; No Canaent: ~ -T'~~ r. • l~ii'~ lr' Y ~ ' • r ~ _ , ~ ~~.r ~ M,'. w t ~ti 9~~~, w i , y ~ . . • . ._~ly r'' i. f1 , , R ti; . , Y 4 r ~ . ~ M. Ooes the reQuested varl ance resul t i n the ci rcumventioh of densi ty regul ati ons desi9ned to protect the Aqu! fer? Yes ; No Cam+ent: ~ Y . - ~ , + ' . . ,~i , - ~ ~..,r~ . ,~`.~r~ie~~ ~t.~r•n~:r ~ . . ` . . •'t?; . . - - . " . 1 ~ 4 ~'S a . ~.'aµ~?`V._. w.~Fi~~,~-j7 ~ .L ~ , ~a ~ f:'Y ti,"~. . . 1 ,f,-.~ . . r .~t(` r ~ ~ ~ , f c 1C~t j~. '~e i- 1 ~ . ~ . . ' n . ~ . ~ < . t,, ~;s.; . . . - - ~ - - ~ . . . / h'j ` ' . . . •~i . 1 ' . . . . ' . ' ~ . . ` ~ tj '"t^~ - . ~ ~ ~ . . - - - ~ - `r •r:, . . . . , . .,i ,i3, . . . . . ~ e ti1i~. Fr;~L Y'^~. J 1 ~ ' ~ , t . . v'T`WC1/Ff:~N s~^~.~ ~ . . . . - ~ - ;~..ti~, •.-ri. :`'or , . . ~:J• ~f. . . : i ti":t ~N'.siA~~~ . , ' ~ . j ~•3~a 0.0,. . ' . 1 . . ~H',~ • ` y I ` ;~w~'~ ~ ~ i . ' ' . . . . 4 ' . ~ ~ 4 i~Kk t ✓ ~1+ a«~.w'i JO' n ~ i ~ . I • . } . . • ~ : . a-~ tit . ~ . . _ . . - ~.~'S' .a ~ ~ - ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ' .,~+My y _ + • . . ~ ` ,*.~_'..~'ti.[+.r~V9 ~;1'{~' . ~ ~ . . . ~ . ~.t r' , ~3, ' ~ • . r i" r> ~F ~ ~t,. ~ ~ ti <at` -9 ~ . . ~k . ~ 3 ~ "tr , : r k' ii 't`' t • . . •~~1~ :7(',..~~i.~.'.Y~~~ x3~~ ' ~ . k~~ . - . ,~i•' 1 , r , . ~ . .,d,;.., l . . , . . . . ~ ~ . , . . 'ki.~`~~ ~~Y~D~',c• . j ~ . ,t.. . . ; . . ' . ~ ~ - vr ~ FY-~~~ - . , . ~ ~ • • , ' . 5 , . • . ' . ° `,.L'Y` ~ °±c+~7C~~ :'Ff''~ ~x'yi'CrS ~w~-_~ ~ ' . ~ ~ , _'t , il, ~ ~„~y;~.:z.a}~!A!{~s/4~ i.1~+~''„"~y~c~,l~.*O"`, . . , . . ' ~ • . . ' . • . M s W 0046Z/Arth. 00021 . Z , . . . _ :Y .,r. _ ,:»..._......_,...r-iiL- . __W.._._.._ . . ~ . • 11 i . . ~~M . , , ~ ~ ► • ~ ` ~ r ' . , • r~ • ' . . _ . ,,'~~s~f!,'.~t1` ~ 3YS, ~-~..^E.<.,.. . . ~y~? r° ly, ' ~,,~C i - . . - - - ~ I • ~ ~ : ~ ~ ' SPOK:ANE COUNTY PL~s~NING I3EPARTMEr 1T A~'Pi,ICATIQNS BEFQR~ THE tiONII~I4~i jSTQR/RO~Ri~ OF ADNSTMIIV'T Ccrtificatc of Excnnptioa No.: . Application No.: ~ Nan1e of Applicant: ~~~n~ -_..,ASant: Y N S trcat Address: ~ _ ~rr ~ ~ . Zip , ~ Phone - •Homc: sDy-9z7~ ya' City: Stat~: Coac: ~ work:_~~ ~ . . , . _ Agents No. Naxne of Property Ownet(s): T ~~=~~~a''~ $t; Cr~ ~d~tCS°:,.,~,~L 77~~-Q~~_1~~-.~~~Jo`y__: Y- . . ; ~ C, . ~P , _ _ Fh~fle - Ha~e:, ,,~,D_~'. ~`?7~~ ~ity:,~ . r~- Scace:_ Codc: ~`~a work: 5~..~~ REQUESTED AG"I'ION(S) (Circle appropriatc action}: ~ _ Var~ance(s) ~ Conditional Use P~rmit Nonconforming Lot/Usc . ~'Aivcr o iolatioa Temporary Usc/Structurc Other: . FOR S''I't~~ USE ONLY CODE: ORDINANC~ o ~ ~ Q ~ ~.~s' : o~0 6 _ Clte Rcgulat~ons Sact~on(s): ~ ~ r Propa~~~iolation/ r` Towns~hip: Rang~: Siie: ~ Enforcemcnt: Y N L,.~ 1~ Comp. Plan Dcs.: l-~ ~'/.X~~ Crossovor ~IQ.~-.~ . ~ . I L,EGAL ~ DIST. CHECKED BY ~~"V" PSSA~ N UTA~ N ASA~ N FIRE r Hcaring Date: ~ Personnel Ta~cing in Application: ~ ' . x Existing Use of Proparty:~ C~ °`r l ~ih ,~arhi~ Gct~~i~ _ . . ~ ~ Dcscribe Intendcd Pra~osal in Tenns of REQUESTED ~~~'IvT^ ~~~~~e:~ a~~~l ~ _5! ~q It ~~m i ~ 4 ~ WGI rq i~3 i~'I~ U~rf~i 0.,n G2. ~n ~(~1~~1 L~aH ~-P-t` ~aGlc~ .~'~,..,~QsS~ ZOU.e. - ~ , ~~~~'c~.-_., vpS'L•~, i%e,~' ~ ~~_Slle ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~~Z+ ~'"/R-~/kP S~"r~?P9'~ L , ~ Street Address of Froperty:. ~ 7r7D~ ~n~'~'~ . ~ Lcgal Description of Pro erty (include . easement, . if applicable): ~ 0 r~~ c~1,~ ~ do~ • P-f- - ~ l~ ~ - - G~ ~s ~ ~oo~-t- ~ ~ ~ ~ < . ~ ~ ~ . . '~`~+r'~i~ ~ - . . ~ - , . ; 2~'~ . . y.. . . , . • . . ~ . • : _ ~ . ~ _ ,~~t' . Parc~l~ No(s):~~"~3 - ~~y ~Sourca of Legal:_~"~~~a ~ TotaI amount of adjoiniag la.nd controllcd by , this . o~~°~ 1,~!_ : , ~ What intcrest do you hold in the propc~rty? d~n ~ ~ ~ : ieasc Iist previous Planning Dcpartmcnt actions ;;invoiving this prop~rty: ~ _ t j~ ~ _ . . . :s _ . r : = - : ' ~ • I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJUR~~~~T: (1j ~:~M THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR T.~? ~'RO~'OSED S~TE; (2) . IF NOT'THE dWNER, . PERMISSIQN. FROM SAID ~WNER AUTHOR:IZINC~ MY ACTIONS ON HIS/I~iER BEHALF IS • A'FTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF~THE ABOVE RESFONSFS AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING D4 ARE MA.DE TR Y AND TO THE BFST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ~ ~ Signcd~: ' ~ Address: ' ~ ~ Phone No.: ~ Date: NOTARY SEAL: . , Notary: . ~ , Datc:~_='~ n y~'" ' . ~ ~ Page 3 of 4 (Ovar) Revised 3-4-88 a~ . . . , . . . . . SFOK:ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE TI-E ZONIIVG ADNSTOR/BOARD OF ADNSTN[ENT , . R FILE NO.'Lj~-AHJ PLAN. DEPT. CONTA L~~8.e,-J2LJIEARING DATE; qz 6 , -ZZcS , NOTE TO APPLICANT: Additional in ormation may bc rcquircd by the Pla.aning Departmeat aftcr the application is submitted if it is found . , that such information is necdcd to clarify the file documcnts ~ A"iti_on,il F-e Beauiremeets , ~ . . ' . ~ . . . Ju ordcr to a.Qsist you wlth your fnanciAT plp-nning rcRarding . thi$ ir &I, 4'is 1l4:J t'.:..*EN(.'T-,S W`i1lH Wfficq Y0~J A~.~ :.z:(ttJT~~~ 'tv i.ONSUi.'I' MAY CHAkGE YOU AN ADDTTIONAL FEE. Thc fccs cilargcd by . the Planning ' Departwent only partially defer our administrative. costs and. are not . sharad with othcr dcpartmcnts or agcncics. . ~ • ' . y,J.' , '-~m~✓~,~5 - K.l~j. i'. ; . f, L : . i, - : ~ Preliminarv Submtttal . : • . , Prior to filing an applicadon, - the project sponsor shall becomc familiar with the current procedures and forms. Planning Dapartment persoancl are available for ' advice on current procedures, past actions which may affect the proposal and the Zoning Ordinance or Code requirements. , Schedullng an Applicatio , far Public, HearinQ CS) , . . . Co m n 1_ c t d applications rcccivcd ; by',,thc aPlanning Dcparttncnt will bc schcdulcd : for public hcariag on the earliost possible date..~ . Department pcrsonnel will, contact the.* _ appiicant approximately 21 daya prior to tha : public hearing, and provide the information ncedcd to fulfill--thc notification;; Tcquirements outlincd in "r-" below. Occasionally, excessive and unpredictable. workloads in the Department may cause scheduling at a later date. ~ y • s~ . x~ . ~s } ti ,tii; ~F • . i r e m e n tQ . . . . D L poUcy requires that the following informadon be submittcd, at a tz:nimurs. NOTE: WE HAVE A FREE NOTARY SERVICE AT OUR OFFICE. ~~~rCompletcd a~,nlication form (green). . . . Comnleted Certificate of Exemfltion form (yellow) (if required). ~ ComQlcted Environmental Checklist (if required). L.4.) Asscssor's scction map for subject parcel and property wi n 300 faot ~ (obtaiaed at the County Assessor's Office). If requirad by cnt, obtain one (1) copy, i ~ f rcquired. The maps are to be submitted yith the application form and other required information to the Dapartmcnt. Outline the subject parcel in pcncil. Adjoining .Assessor's maps that are nceded: Statement of Attendine Phvsician for Denendcnt Relative (if applicable). Affidavit of Deoendent Relative Circumscance4 (if applicable). ' ~ Eees - Most frequently encountered fees,, at tho time this application was distributed, aro itemized as follows: Dependent Relative Conditional Usc ' Permit $ 50.00 All othar Conditioaal Usc Pcrmits $ 275.00 Variance ar Waivcr of Viola• ~on (sliding-scalc valuc), Environmcntal -Chccklis.t 75.00 ' y . . - . '1.. t r _ . . . , . . • ' 4dpiftill be collect2d •r . . ime of, anolication conference and aovlied toward it e total fee when the a2~l~ n. i4 submi,tted, Page 1 of 4 , . • : ' . ; . . _.r. . - , . r~. , - • , _ _ - t-. . . _y. . . _ . . - . T A. 11UR121N Q PROOE It is necessary fvr thc applicant vr hislher ;_~epreser~tatiy~t to astablish the r~easons why the REQUESTED ACTIUN shouId. be, appr~avcd and to litcrally put fortb the basic case. Accordingly, you shvuld have becn g1VGA a fonn fur your requested action (aariance, conditia►nal use, etc.) de,signed ` ta -help you prestnt your casc in a way . which addresses thc critena wbich the Zoning. Adjustar must consider. Plcase fill thc form oue and return it with your application. If yau did not get $ form, ask the Pianning I)epartment persannel fvr advic+c on bow to proceed. C"JGN-OFF BY CC)TI.LYTY' PAB►TMENTS A,ND OTHER A~ENCIES 'r1..).COUNT1' HEALIH.12rSTHICT _ - : - :~_s't.~. s . , 'r rI z `,i f S' r- i''a ~ ' -~;L. . . . . a) Prapvscd mcthvd of watcr sup'ply. . ~f._.. . . . . ' . . - , , . . . . . . K.. 4 . b ) Propased mcthad of scwage disposal: ' A prcliminary cansultation has bcen held to: discuss the proposal. The appliGant 'has been infanned of requirements and 'standards. ' (Signature) - (Datc) {Sign-vff Waived} . . . . .,:r. . ' . . . ti ~ _ , . . , . . • • 1 + ' . . f3, . _ . r • . , , - . A preliminary cvnsultatian. has bccn held to discuss the proposaY. ThG applicant has been infvrmed vf ` requireracnts and. staudards. e- . ~ . . y ~ ~ ~ . . . . . l. . . - (Signature) - {I)atc) (Sign-Qff VV'aiveti) ~,;~,r~ ~'~~~P*= . . (Wa1VC 1f OL1LSldG WMAB)' r . ~ . : . A prclimanary cvnsultation has been . held to discuss the gmposalf The,. applicani as be n informed of rcquirements and st,$n rd , _9lj " ~~'~~e ~v~ ~ ~ ` (S1gA8tLtFC) (Date) - (Sign-off Waivad) l] '1'h!: appli; aht ss roqu'.ed ,c dis("So Or. proposal with to becorne infointcd vt wae~~~~ Syster~.M rcquircments and standards. . - , The applicant is requirCd to discuss iho pr+aposal with . to bccvmc infonncd of sewage dfspvsal . rcquiremeats and sfandards. 031AIER EURVEYOR; (Waive if outsidc CWSSA) a} The prapnsal i= not rvcated within the boundary of our futurc ~ scrvice area. b} Thc prvposal islis not Iocatcd within thE boundary of our currcnt . disirict. c) Wc arelar~,n,o t able to servc this sitc with adequate watcr. d) Satisfacivr arran cmenEs elh ve not 3' ~ h~v...._ bccn madc to scrve this prflpasat. . . :t: _r71 ` ~ (Signatura) (I7ata) (Sign-vff Waivcd) . ty; . • . a.~, : 5. .UJFRAGE~' ~.!R' . r ' . (If vther than Seokane [:vUnty! l~ A preliminary cansuItativn' has bG+'.Il -hCld to discuss the +oFospl. I.. Thc applicant has bcca infvrmed.. of requiremcn an andards. : _ • - ~ - w,~+-M~ ~ • , g; r (Signaturc) - (Date) -dff Waivcd ) ~ . . . . . .'r- . . . . . . . ' . - . . . . . - . „,u . . . . . _ _ , . . . . - . v~ Y_ Pagc 4 vf 4 . • . _ , . f~if L 'y~4. . . . . . . . . ' • . , Y , - • . - ' . . ° ~ F'~" ~ 5 • . . ' . . ' ~~f„~ • , ' ' . ~S~'qt ..4' ._~w~ r - J _ + . . . . _ . .,a, t ! . ,_r . . . . , . . . . . . _ - ~ - _ . r +rt . , . .s' . - ; . t . , . . . - 4~ J~t'„~ ' .A . , _ . . ait~`3 L •''1', . . ar-_ . ' . - ' . . • ` • ~ . , . ~ . . . ~ 4,- ~ • . ~ l • ' ~ k , 5 p~y „ y!Yr . . . V i. yT > s ~ : • ` ~ ' APPLICAN7'S FORM V'~ . h - ~ NAME: r . .i4 , . . . . • , . . . . . . . r +l.-~ r ~ _ a ~ . ~ FILE: 4 . - j. . • . „ . „ . br ; _ _ ' . , . . ~YT•~+'j Y `a _ , , ~r . ~~-~.~~1 'r{~1 T~~t ~ Y-~;~~. L.:.~ ' y^.l~ t J! T C- • T ~,lCEc I . Y~Q3/~l~J ~ . 7r. s~.fk.i}'.~. = ~ `i) - . •,~ti . 1•`~laf'..1 :~.~i'.r~. :,R , ~ othenvl se -prohi,bi ted i n_.thi s zone,. A. Wi 11 the vari a e` uthori ze a use ~ . . - • _ ; . ,~as`'~;~'.~y'~~+d^'-,;,,5~};-~'~-'~~` . '.~~i Yes , No , Comrnent. .i > - . . c . 1... ~ . _ . `1 _ - 12P . . ~ . " y ~ ~ ~ . ♦ . . ' . . . . _ .~,~.:j..y'ib^'?"r"`,~at~~ ~ 1 . . . ~ , ~,-;f ~ •~r ~r~;~-. . , . _ ' ' • , . . ~.':~y'q[' ~ . - , 8. Yi 11 speti al ci rcumstances a r 11cab1 e to the ~ ro ert (such as si ze, ~ shape, topography, surroun ngs when Combine with the standards of . the Zonin9 Ordinance, create practical difficultles for use of the ~ property and/or deprive the property of ri ghts and pri vi 1 eges common ~ to other properti es 1 n the vi c1.n1.t and sirt~ i 11 ar zone cl as 1 i cati on? mme nt : 7~ - S ~`7 Yes No Co ~ ~ • .1.;r ~.`i'; K . .1 / ~ • / A i.-~~~~~.~~~ ' ~Q''~' • ~ ~ ~ y~• ♦ . v ~~d/, ^ ~ 7'' . t ~ f/ l ` O ~ / r . , r ~ ':±'r t.l~X'~, rt~ai~' ~4, • .1. . . , ~ ~r.: . . . - . _ . y~: y w~w'•°v~e',~S Y` _ C. Wi 11 the 9ra nti n9-'of the ra ri a nct bo mattri a11y detrimonte1 to the publ i c wel fire or 1 njuri ou s to property or improvements 1 n the , viciMty and zone? Yes ; No Cortments: - ~ ,i~ ~ ~ ' ~ . `t . ' ~ ~ ~y f-CY~ ~ . . . ~ . . . , i ~'{:..~=~r"~ .~i' - • ~ , ~ ' • +r ~Ct , f .l i _ : . ,!r G • a " 1-. S S'~ I T~~ 1 Y ~ ~ l` ,1: ,y}1' ' f . } ~ . • . ~ . ~ ) . . , . - . , 'h., , ~a. . - • . , ~ _3' .4- . ~4~MY~~"".}``r' r.~ewysPs`.~ F 0. Ooes strict "appl ication of the~,zoni ng standard 'rreate an unreasonabl e' ; . burden in 1i9ht ot pur~oseto be..served by the standard?, Yes.~; No ; Co~aaent: t~~- ' ~ ' f i"i~~~~~iP~~~:~~': i'- ? "'1f - • , f~p.,,. . • . ~,ti:~+J2Y.. ~ • . . . . . - _ . . • ~ , . . - . ~ . . . - ~ . E. Would relaxation ot the zoning standard make a more envlronnentally sensi ttve or energy-conservi ng project or enc a9e cont1 nued or new • use ot an hi storlc proPerty? Yes ; No ; Comnent: . /V F. Will a broader, publlc need or lnteres be served by granting verse denyi n9 the vari ance? Yes ; No • Com~ent: . , . . G. Is the case for*a variance~supported by other like or si ilar si tuatl ons i n the vi ci ni ty a nd i,n_ simi 1 ar zones? -Yes ; No ' CO~T~{~ Y• . . ~S'.,,~ ` ~`~•~i':•.. ~ ' . . ~ . . . k'-. - . . w ~ ~ . t . , . . :r~. . ~ . ~ !t' ' • - ' • - ' i .~r • ' . F '~L/r._ ~ ~ . ~ ' , . . ~E`' a'S^' ~ `:b~ ' _ • • ' . , . , (continued on reverse side) ~ . ~ i t fh'7 t y r NY~ ~A- . ~ ~ - f P. . -r j'1 ' ♦1~ . `t~y. ; v S.r a. . ' ~ ~ . j _ • ~r .7~ 1 ~ . . ~ S._•.i r~'~~~ • ~ ~:1?. ~i. ' ~ . . . . ~ r. ~ l _ _ . t ,F i A. -:.r ~rF' .t, 3i~„~~;~~~5 . r }..l _ . ~ ; fy~L .~~7 y.~ , - ~ . ,'~.e~t , ~•~t~ ~ ¢ ' F.. V . ~ ~ - l~,'~, s _ .1.Y?; 7T 1 , ~ I s~ ~ ~ , . - -e s ~y~ 7'1Z .fi,. • - ` ~ L ~ i . . •r~a ~ ~ ~ x+ ' ~ i . ~ . . ' . i ~ ~1~; ~ : . ~ • • . ~ 5,~ ~s^1 ~ -~~,'"~+r{~ t~ r • r ' . ~ ` ` ~ ~ s~' ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ . ' ~ _ . ,,r,,,~,L. 3,,~ , ' . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . Y . 71 ~}x'I > ;•c r , ~ _ i; . ~ . f ~ ~ y ~~iF~ . • . . ~ s( ' .~i ~ . S . . ' . . . ".•~~l_"~Sfi JT ~ . ' ' . . t \ ~ ' . ~ H. wi l l granti ng the va ri ance `adYersely af fect the overa{ 1 zoni ng desi gn p1 an or concept for ei ther the immediate area or the "enti re County? ~ Ye s ; No ; Camme n t : a„n-.~~ ; ~ ~ ¢-~-t. ~ fG ~ou~:s ~ n s o~.-N~• S, 2i ve.fwo. o's-e. 4-k,- On 4 1r si ti~c r-f iN ats{~'r~n . r _ _-.r....~....~....,.~._.,.... . . I. Is the case for a variance substantially based upon a lack'of reasonable econani return or.a claim,that the existing structure ts too sma11 ? yes ; No Comnent: aq-ea i s ti~ ~r~,t,,PdcL-t y . G~ o ra~w.. ~r-~.~`~?!~r`°v~we.S- -O r~ ~-a. ri v,c,f" $'~►d~Y ~ty~t fi t~u-~-(* t-~~ pnroT~t,~ N' t ~h.t 2 }•ci { ` 0 ~ lA.? . P,1 Arl' 2a:. ..~.~a.'T ~d i'i., j f D . J. W111 granti ng the 4ari ance be -1 nconsi stent wi th the general, purpose and intent of the Comprehensives Plan? ,..Yes No . I\/ ; Comnent: ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1-'.'4 i~•1 . . . . . . 1 . 'i _ ~ . . ~ . ' ' . ..tr • ~ . .S,•. ;:~a}~.~~,'^' . . ' ~ ~ . , . K. Did the practical di f fi culty ~whi ch gi ves . ri se rto the vari ance request exist before the property wa,s acquired^t by thye,,present owner?-Yes 'No ; Comment: A ~ - . , . ~ - ~ , '..:a....Y,,,+.;~~,... :..rJ.=n~• 1 ~ . . ~ ~ t~ 1. •~.4 ' L J~ y~ ,(~r 1 1•!/4~.~ . . •(~,~.JIy, +~y4. , , . . - . . . f. . EK.l._{~ . , . ' ~ fs!',~•~• ~ T ~ , . •a ~ ~ . . . . . . f1~'R'.(. ~ . TS / ♦ L. Wi11 the granting of the variance result in defacto zone reclassifica- ; ti on; that. is, the establl shi ng of. nearl al l the privi 1 eges cc>mmon to a,different zone classification? ~r~Yes"'`-~~~~ : No ; Comnent: ~ . . ' . . w . ~ "~~i: :~L: ~ - . . : y~ r_ - ~ . . . ~ . . . . . . • . . . . ~ . - M. Ooes the requested variance resul t i n the ci rcumventi on of densi ty regulations designed to protect the Aquifer? Yes No C=ent: . . ~ _ :T. - . - . . : , . . . . . . , ~ - - ~ . , . 4 } lF, ..y . ' . ' ~ MT''jJ~ ' ' ' . , ~ ~ . ' t F r ~ , . ~ , '~4 - . . r ~ i ~ra • 1 . . . t . , r. :.,r.. , •-~X.,a~wrk' lSbCS'r " , . , : y ~ ~ ; ~ . `r. - . . . . . . • . . i k iic.a~t ~ 4 ~ . . . J a"~" n • µ ;.s~i''4 ~ ~ . . . , , . \ . . - ~~.~ii.~' i'4 . " i ~~~`kS~ .,tr ::j~~ ' .r~., . . ~ • . . . - - , _ ~ ~ ' , >Y G ' ` . . . r~f~ i 1 - . ~ . ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ • ~ .t _ ~ ,51 r !-K y~„r~►~^r.. ~.t ~ • \ . ' ~ ~c -7` j•, ' 'rr • > ~j ' ~ . • , .,a. °S~i ~~~~~_t~i~~'~1.~ . '~`~/ti= . ~ . , ' . ri{. ~ . ' '~y6~ i . , ~ _ .;r ~~y ~ ' ' . i , . ~ t .~":>~t t r , ~ . .'•'~eK" ~ ~ . 'r . . t ~ ; ~ f ~ ~ ~ ry6C,• ~~..w l y{ t. ~ n . e ~r . I r ~ y h ~~~7iR~!1~'~~y~r:►~~F ~'i+' L ~ ~ ~ - .~~1~~F. ~ " y~,P.ry~,~4 ~Y q ~ . _ . +~'"t"r~i~~~~~~ .~'.-~YtY~tr~~' -~~ti - . c 7~ n.:'•' ~G~ ~~jy y~r~" } d ~ E f~ . . ~ ~ y~ . . E,= ~i ~ ~r• t . a y, ~is = ~ '~.'~,E -S c ~h~7Y~,(~,~f iF~K~t~• 'j, . W- 1~~.5,.f',~~~.. eJ' . i . ~ ~ 7~2; 3vill; ~ ~ ~ , v~ k1a. ~I .~t` ~ 1 V• ~ T~wK-~Ssi-7'tY~h.t-~ 7~-x, D:'i { . s ~ y~~~r . ..r'~v f ~ ~ .ti ~l y t ~.•.'(~4L ~ . , .Y' n i . r ~ ~ i . ~}r 2 p ♦ .~'~'c ~b'v - 2 t 1 ' ? - ~ ~~~R•t~~ * ~ ~ dGt~t~.j^.,. s'~~. 4,. r~~~tt♦~2 ~y,'~~ ~ ~ ? ..i~ sr~' . . . ~ r ~ ~ T "r.!'-'~.iZ~.~ ~ Y ~ ,l • ~ ~ ~ ~ .w., ~rt' ~ , . ~ 'n~ r~Ar~~t. • ' t Y 1Y . 7 . " . . . . .~V.y 2`. . M~ IY~`.~!M'a"'~'_~~'~',1Y11, . Yi~,.f~.7~. i~'. ~ ~M +.a: S''" , . . - - y~ si{.' :y . 1't'*~ ~ y' / ~ ` ' ' ~ ~ ~ . . ~ , 1. ~ • . . e.. ~ ~li d't<.y'~~~y G sl f , . _ ,r, • ~_x. .zrjila: t" , v'n:,; ~ ~t' . . , „ t . • . - .~r~x.~~..~+lp•~~'~ . . _ _ i~:~ • _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..t , . , . i•. ' ' -<f` X`~i , F~ i . 0046z/ArCh. 0002z 2 . . 1.!~t: 7' 'f~~~• jr~ 1 . ~ ~ T~~2~. ~ ~ ~ ' - ' ~tt'1~~ ~ VKA , - • ,f.~ • . ' S,.QI . ~ t ~ •h ~j~j h~ t~ ~'M cj u ~tn~';~{ ' ~ iti' ~..c. ~f ' i F~ . ~ ~ . S ~ ~~i L'~1.Zt ~,•~1 ~f~'' . + ~I• - . . _f ° . _ r Zt . - v' - ' . ' • , . . , . i . • ~ ' ~ • . . s ~'1 i , . . . . . , . . . _ . . . _ . . , , , . . . ''o I 2 RECE 1 P T Da te V\''l 19 SFD N o ! M- tj" ~ ~ ; ~ Received From ~ U. ~ Address _T=:~, 4Z~uv ~ t ✓~.~--w,~t ~ G ~ Dollcars $ fi ~ Fo r ~ 0 4 i N i 1 ACCOUN7 HOW PAIO ~ ~ AM7 OF h y ~ ACCOUNT CASH ~ AMT PAID ChECK BAIANCE MONEY By - DUE -4- ORQER ~ ~ . ~ . . . b ~ J `JOHN R ADRIAN s-sa 1447 WOL. ADRIAJR401MJ DEBBIE ADRIANt E 7708 S RIVERWAY 927-9008 ~ D~ 28-8269/3251 SPCKANEi WA 9921 r • ~qfthe ' ~L50~= . (~2ARyi~c:ac~ta.lfylltit~'~t~i42t~tat~tA~?~+i~ifpe ~~~c4~f~ltylf~Z?l14~1 w sgot, ~ • f,r3..'~ OQ11''' I f 4ANE RMMMi lnGDI IJMM a--4 7 ~ r-'i ~J , 3r 7 ' p., ~'O•'R.~`'~~~~ q~~t~a"~~ yf ;,.~a -~'3~ ~-7, ~r _ ,~2 X~1. s ~ F47~~ For~ _ 1:325i826901: 2L2?3L03 s EASYDISP Vi o01 - ROAD ~EGMENT I PblFO RMAT I CIAi Road Nijmber: 0558 CEhITER RD StL-trt MPg or'l rj(nrtion C1 assa Local Access Endinq MF'a 00 51 Rura11U-ban: L1r-ban FedeYa1 R►-tute Pavement Sholt1 ders Typen LiDw Typ~ BitL~min~~-us Typen None Wa.dth (Fept)ti ir Lefit (Peet )o ou #of L. nesd 0-1 RiQ h it (F Ae t): 00 Medians General In#c-rmatzr-n Type: None CLirbs° None b;Jxdti) (1=eet)4 Sidewa1~ ss Nc-ne PF5 to Lsst Road Tntersections. C'F15 to Enter new SeQRientn PF.l. 6 To Enter new Ftciado EASYD ISF' V 1 a(")1- FQAI3 SEGMEnIT INFO RMAT I ON RoDad PJ um bc r- :45:4 - SOUTH R T WERWP►Y AU Start Mfi'. 00Q0D Fitnci.i-nn rlass: L~~~ca1 Access Enc]ing MPa 0cr. F7 Rural./Urbane Urban Federal F~-DLtte Pavemen L Shoit] ders Type: Low Type Bx.titmininits Typen None Wa.dtl) (Feet )r 1s Left tFeeta„ 00 Lanesd 0-1.1 Ftagh,t (Feet 00 Meclians Gerteral I nformAta.nn Typ~ ~ Noi"12 Ci! rbsn Nonp Wa. dt h (Feet)p ~ :.dw w a~ F s° let nne f'F'5 tin L ist Road Inter se ctionsb PF1.5 to Fnter new Segment„ I'F16 TiD Enter new Roacla . ~ . ~ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON July 6, 1990 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJ: VE 19-90 / Adrian re: Variances The County Enqineering Depaztment has reviewed the above zeferenced application. The followinq comments are offered for inclusion fn the Findings and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be approved. E66 THE APPLICANT SHOULD HE ADVISED THAT AN APPROACH PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACHES. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF A BUILDING PERMIT E60 Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 6 Which specifies the followinq: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authozize the County to place their name(s) on a petftion for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36 88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be detived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, toqether wrth the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID. and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to obiect to any assessment on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunctfon with the formatfon of the RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW Thrs requirement applies to South Riverway Avenue or Center Road whichever the subject parcel takes access . ~ • page 2 E36 Applicant shall dedicate 7.75 feet on Center Road f4r right of way. y E36 Applicant shall dedicate 7.75 feet on South Riverway for right o f way. E38 Appl3cant shall dedicate the applicable radius on Center Road and South Riverway Avenue. Roadway Data : Existing Right of Way Center Road 34.5 ft. Right of Way width after dedication - 42.25 ft. Width of improved Roadway 16 ft. Type of zoadway surface Low Tvpe Bituminous. Functional Classification --Local Access Existing Rfqht of Way South Riverway Avenue - 34.5 ft. Riqht of Way width after dedication - 42.25 ft Width of improved Roadway 18 ft. Type of roadway surface Low Tvpe Bituminious Functional Classification --Local Access . . ~ ~ OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON July 6, 1990 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning Administrator) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER SUBJ: VE 19-90 / Adrian re: Variances The County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The followinq comments are offered for inclusion in the Findings and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be approved. E66 THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT AN APPROACH PERMIT MUST 8E OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANY NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACHES. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF A BUILDING PERMIT E60 Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No. 6 which specifies the following: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the oWner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvement or construction contemplated Within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID. and (3) that the property rrithin the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW ThYS requirement applies to South Riverwav Avenue or Center Road whichever the subject parcel takes access ~ ' ► M6 ~ . page 2 E36 Applicant shall dedicate 7.75 feet on Center RQad for right vf way. E36 Applicant shall dedicate 7.75 feet on South Riverwav for right of way. E38 Applicant shall dedicate the applicable radius on Center Road and South Riverwav Avenue. Roadway Data : Existing Right of Way Center Road 34.5 ft. Right of Way Width after dedication - 92.25 ft. Width of improved Roadway 16 ft. Type of roadway surface Low Type Bituminous. Functional Classification --Local Access Existing Riqht of Way South Riverway Avenue - 39.5 ft. Right of Way width after dedication - 92.25 ft Width of improved Roadway 18 ft. Type of roadway surface Low Tvpe Bituminious Functional Classification --Local Access s ~ NAME . a~~ VAR IANCE N0. V~- ADORESS 7 7 ~ AOMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE PNO -HOME 7 WORK -OF R.~ y . NAME ROAD The ol l ovring documents are needed before the Engi neer's Department can begin proces ng your variance applica tion as approved. ' RECORDED copy of deed, contract or conveying instrument these may be obtained from the County Auditor, 2nd floor of the Courthouse - Document must display AUDITO RS STAMP. 1 egal descri ption of your access easement a listing of the names of individuals who will be signing the documents which wi11 be prepared by the Engineer's Department. These individual names should appear as the person(s) legally sign their name. (NAMES) i a current Anessor's map which depicts the 1 ocati on of your property and ownership micro-run.° These may be obtained from the the County Assessor, lst s floor, of the Courthouse, Jefferson entrance, 2nd door on the left. The necessary documents will be prepared by the Engineer's Department, Right-of-Way Section, upon provi sion of the informati on noted above. You wil l be , notifi ed when the documents are ready for signature. The documents may be sent to ~ y ou, however, IT SHOULD 6E NOTEO THaT ALL SIGNaTURES MU ST 6E NOTARIZEO. The ~ Engineer's Department does have notaries available if you choose to sign the documents at our of fi ce . Please call when ready Please mail when ready tJoti ce to Publ ic No. Ri ght-of-Way ' COMMENTS , Ri ght-of-Way Agent Forward to you froq~- 05090 ' F1lED Oh REGM)tu REavESi o~ 90121~24135 Ptn of Parcel 06543-2234 OEC IZ 1118 N~ SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~ Spokane County, Washington ANU~ ` w~~~'1 AUOITOR SPOKANEt COUNiY' WASH+ RIGflT OF WAY DEED 1~5 9 pAGE 136O ~ SAN7;.3N J;Zlv~ IN THE MATTER OF Center Road , No. 1201-8 RNOW ALL MEN BY TAESE PRESENTS, that John R. Adrian of the County of Spokane, in the State of Washingtoa, for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have ' granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant. bargain- sell and convey unto said Spokane County the following described parcel of land situated in Spokane County in the State of Washington to wit. That portion of the West 65 feet of Block 18, ORCHARD AVENUE ADDITION, as recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, Page 24, in Spokane County, Washington, lying Northwesterly of an arc concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 20 feet at the Northwest corner, the ends of said arc being rangent with the West line and also being tangent with the North line. Located in Section 6 Township 25 North- Raage 44 East, W.M. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same• unto the said Spokane County for the purposes of a public road forever. IN WI SS WHEREOF, I have hereuato aet mY hand(s) and seal(s) this day of ~ 19 ~ . E Excise Tax txempt , Date Joh . Adrian, a single person ~ Spokam Counly Tnms„ ST TE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss On this day personally appeared before me John R. Adrian personally knowa to me to be the individual(s) who executed the forgoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntarq act and deed of said individual(s), for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Given under my~ haad and seal this I~ 7~ day of , 19 d . . ~ • • FM nEMunn ~ S/e~ vEeu~~ y • ava~ atY p ic In and f or the State of ~ 77d g • YrYiashington ~Po I c.t)a 4 5 Z 1 Z i0 0 0 a 0~c~~ A Spokane ~2s'o . f~ tifiU =AFE1104 - - 6310100193 . ~ 'I I enikV[ rAMrs ~ TICOR TiTIE INSURANCE '"'s F ~'~p~yffWe~.6@[y Q s usr _ & *em coup"w {c,,Uc. , i ' T G Patterson ~ tor Rccord at Requat oi Ocf i0 1228 P1{'$1 ~ ~ YIfILLIAN E DGHANJE aUOITOR tPRKARF COllKTY. WASH. DEPUTY S3 00 914 Paulsen Bldg 99201 W T ~t ~ ~ PORII L 56 R „z cLva(iR HERBERT M ADRIAN, a/k/a Herb M Adrian for purposes of disclaiming interest in property for which title was taken for security only, comey and quit cieim to JOHN R ADRIAN, a single person the foiloving described reel eatete, situeted !n the County of Spokane State of Yaehington including any i-tereet therein vhich gsentor may hereafter acquire The West 65 feet Except the South 100 feet of Block 18, Orchard Avenue Addition, Pt as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, page 24, described as follows Begimmng at the Southarest corner of said tract, thence East along the South line 141.13 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Tract to a point in the Northerly line of said tract, thence Northwesterly along the North line of said tratt to the Northwest corner thereof, thence South along the West line t0 the point of beginning, EXCEPT the South 100 feet, Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington Exd. aax v«e a A7A9199 Sa6 Aed Pd~' D E "SKIP" CHILWG saolcsaft unrr trom Dated this day of 1983 . . - - rsEALI PtIhNESOTA - - - - - isEALt SL►lE OF UOiKtiZAW . !L County of On [hLe day pessonelly appeared Defcre we Nerbert M Adrian to me knovn to be the indlvidual deseribpd in end who executed the vlthin and foregoing instrument. end acknovledged that he elgned the same aa his free and voluntasy act and deed. fos the uses end purposes thereln mentianed ctveN un%,21u!.°giiEtttaal .amYr~aay of 1°~3 YATtIIEEt~ A R^fTTGER 'ge ~ `~4 l..~r i't t' 1 t SJ1A __--P~_L c.~/ ~ . . r ~ ;tf 571 •~•t / 1548 ,J ~a t , ♦3 j - b111130070 STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED The GRANTOR KATHRYN ZIMMERMAN a single woman dealing in her sole & separate property for and in consideration of ONE (S1 00) DOLLAR AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION in hand paid, conveys and warrants to HERB M AORIAN AND JOHN R ADRIAN, the following described real estate, situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington ~ W 65' Exc S 100' B 18 Orchard Avenue Addition, Pt TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises, with their appurtenances unto the said Grantees, their heirs and assigns forever And the said Grantor does hereby covenant to and with the said Grantees, that she ts the owner in fee simple of said premises; that they are free from all incumbrances and that she will warrant and defend the same from all lawful claims whatsoever. DATEO this 30thday of October , 1981 it rad" Ts • M/ liiii %13 #A5z)fflS0- 7251 R Y N I M EN v S?ATE OF IDAHO, COUNTY OF KOOTENA1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SPOKANE On this ?O day af L=ro4gr&, I hereby certify thaL this instrument 1981, before me, a notary public in was filed for record at the request of and for said state, personally appeared KATHRYN ZIMMERMAN, known to at minutes past me to be the person whose name is o'clock m, Lhis day of subsCribed to the within instrument, 1981, in my office, and duly recorded in cknowledged to me that she Book of Deeds at page d the same F iIEQ OR RrR ('~F'IE,Q. ~ ~ EX-OFF1C10 RECORtiD~~•F~~S T I.. Char'1r9 13 ~m j~tT L, ^ip- sisA ~K $1 y^;pU Q L BY Nov 13 10 43 ' ~►11..~~~~~ F Depu ty ttr.t . Fees S sr.,hiti~~v.i "e31y GBENbAidO 00 MAIL TO F 0 Bax 21E --F9$t-Pe~s 3 , - ~ . f~•. ~ ~ ..J.._. ' _ NAME . 0 / I . }5 ~ ~ 't • i`a~ t•-i f'1 1 I... . f i k ~ _ o.. ..a . . , . t E f { ` ' f1( . . . ~ . L . . . . . l.. . I%~~~ 5 } • t ~'f f ...~w:: 9 , S 1 I~k~ ,a L. 1 ~ry~..,. ~,y ..~p+. f e E l/1 I. ~ ii`p { , I F 4 1 L. L. A I A 1•~. 4 6~ 1 ~ 1.} 1) 1 ~ L. 1., {k Pit». ~ a 9,~1 E. { l.. ~~,{v0 5,r 4s~ A~... 8.. S+l 4 . .{ti ...e o.. M1.. r.... .a.. ...r e... 5..~` i f 1••} F~+r 1,.. ~ ! 3~~ ~4 ~ l:.~ .S t r-f 1~ , L.. M N 1, 4.... t' N a. l! A S ..t d A S A A tlt 1... N V 4 12'.. 01 1) 1~ ,1 D Q?.f 4 3 a-~ C~34 w f1 S'~ A. i }t . F i }-ti iS r~' ~ F i }['rt i.«,. .'1 i,f~ i j 'j J., I y . . j•~1 I,~ A~ I"ti f... ts ~ ~~l S. l~ ~ .9 f~J ! a f a n a d..~ 4 :r ~ lA ty.. r. r.. n.. m. ` i .l F ~ L. E 'y!!~ f I r..s'.~.3 t~ xr .A. . ~ u , . » . - . . _ . ..w 0 ~~t~ 1 :r ~Vt ~ i f 1,: ll F~4 . 1A~... f"; I.., c•r 1~.~+ l' ` ~J 0 w f ~::1~.~ ~'~f L.. ~1~- I~ E. 1 {.+,1.. I- xa ! 1 l~ i.~. ~~t w i ~ yF a L.. f i ? p Y~!1 S I - I ] ~ . ~ c'• h i ~ , d r ~ r-~ _s f-ti. ~~P , 1 4~~0 I~ r~~ ~ ~ ~:r . i°~ ~ xt,= ~i ~F:~ i l~~ V~ 1•1 1 : F~ , ~ s I i ft ol :l v :I " C C1 114 9 9 9 9 9 L) La 'r' F! v lF;' W r°) Y I::: 1 A C, T J: v 1: T y „r♦9 1r 1b ~ #~i 4`•~ 1:7 "d{'1 3r .~•1 I} ('1 I"J 0 I~~ / o~ 1 I'e J i 6 I E1.I. .,t•;'ff` 'li . I~:}~' 4'~ I•t P•t'~'t i'1 Y"1 ro 1 i ] _ > " . • ~ A } r'[..' 1°' fi A`i 1.., T .lr. , B l ~..E i`I 0 Fry; `T'~.r t'•'! ~,r 0 131 .1, L. 1... T ~,J G C. : E ~ D E ~ ~ K ~~o ~ r~ ~ ~ `:3 ~ r~ 'r' : .r.. .i. . . ~ . . . li~ T. Iti1'.:1 t6 } 1 ~ tlr I€ - I C+, I 1 I::. I`t 1'7).' ; F tE . 0N2 _ x,~ s x r a a s_ 1 A? • ...t -~.I+ I.4 • l„ • . ~ . . . i•~! ~ e1 ~1 : L. 1... ~ ~:P ~ ~ ~ ~a} ~ }'"1 f 1 ~.r I' f i 9 C) ~5,~ : . v.. ~ t... 1:_. G i ~ I,., 1.) ~ FCR.T F."Y I_ l.l N ~7'1) :k: i:? L.. .r 1f~~'t:•1 I• i:: l: 0 6 a':~ F ...I C..~ I~~~ ~_1 it~ ~ ~ 1-~ ~ 4 I~: ~a I~' ~ 1 ~ ~ 1=: a) L. !~t' :l: f ~~r 0 1 1 1 C? R H pt 1:11, D A V Pi l? 3:? PT B I ER ; W6.".:> F. "1' l:: X C" LS' 10 0 F'T B i c; _ 0;r... 04 r~ ~ ~ Cy 8 ~ f~ ~ ~j t ~ X. l..p.-.:~ t- 1- : 'f t E. ' L, I':. ! t:;: 1'"~ , C•t ~.:1 I"~I ~ ~ f~ : t~l _:T 1 C"j i~', • I .~x ~''~1 ' t i ~'1 T ~.:ti - C~:! 4'~ i~! f::: t~AE l:. ~~~.1=:. F-r ..ry , ; , . . , . . „ . ' ~ r i'i I''-. . . . !F : i rirr} r } q k _ . ' r. . r.i ~ ...i,I. . l. ,I,.rI i .f).. . 1 , { . ~ ] ~ 5 i... 0 . r~7r . i .,f ''R ,f~ j I~{. 4! 1 } " ~'C i I... 'Sl` ~ 'r•. . 4.} a x.. 1;.. ~'1 . 3. r :f i .i. 4..'. • d,' a.? ~i 1... I~I I .f. ~ y f... 1•~ ~.f . J'', l. ~ J°~ F.« 1', I F l.: 1... f~l ~ > i;' . ~ ~ s~ E (4) T !:fi T t^r 1,.. m K' T a_ I.,. D t:'l,.. .Y L.. X? E'l I... Jl? (s ~ CH.1-I I::-, P"'t' m f..t C-E T.) e I~' ~Y~.1..j h~ _ ~•i~ ~"'F I~~ 4'~ 16 ~4 0 0 N1 E... .1..~ ~ tA E 4j i'~ a : x ' S„r ~ ff~ I•~ ..a 1 0 S 1 i~~ > L. l::. V I::.1... : 'i 0 0 _ 4; 0 0 , 0 %:a 10 C.4 , i~~ .100. 0f ) 1 $3 0 . 0 ~'~,1 t 40C) , ~ F I 1 d6's S.. ~ 4 • ~ 1t~{ 13, 400 ~ : : N 1~'~ ( i I... i='i ~9 ~ M'f* 11 ~ 4 0 7 ~ 0 0 C) 0 f ~1 ~ ~ ~;P k'1 ~ l:~ r~: i::. i'~1 F~' :I_ l:.~ ; ~ : ~3 L~~~i f~=°!_::►~€'`tI ...Ty : I ' p► A B. L. E : 23, , 400 ~ „ OFFICE 4F THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON TO: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. (Current Plannin~T Administrator) FR c~,%l~ ~pnK a\77 rOT T\T-rv rNT(",TNTrrQ ~ :i)(L' 13 i L~.i: WL-I9-90, John Adriail 5cLbac;I: Variance re: Board of Adiustment ApDeal Hearing After several discussions with the applicant and his representative, the County Engineer upon review of further information submitted by the applicant requests that County Engineering Conditions #'s 3 and 4 be waived and that since dedication is not being required that County Engineering Condition # 2 also be waived from the previous Zoning Adjustor action on VE-19-90. This reconsideration was based on a site specific analysis of the parcel in question. The applicant should be advised that should Center Road or South Riverway Avenue be widened to the appropriate width per the County Road Standards Typicai Section, noise and inconvenience could pose constraints on the property because of the adjusted setbacks for the property. Following are the recommended Engineering conditions of approval: l. An approach permit must be obtained from the County Engineer prior to the canstruction of any new driveway approaches. This must be done prior to the release of a building permit. 2. The applicant shall dedicate an applicable radius on Center Road and South Riverway Avenue. w . v S I> O I< A N E ~'j C O U N T Y OFFlCE OF THE CoUN7Y ENGINEER • A DIVISION OF TNE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMFNT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director FACSIMIr,E COVER SHEET DATE: ~ 12LIQ TO: ~ Clif. ATTENTION: CITY/STATE: S PO~1~~V ~ (A)o ~ FAX NUMBER: --L-- NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 1 , FROM: CovlvrY f1L)K,11va5K- ~ COUNTY FAX NO.: (509) 45 6-4715 MESSAGE/SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: ?pQ$i2O c-) P ~-v s ; ~'U o rU V~ - I G-~ c~ QF pp T V S T1''l Please contact Q" at (509) 456-3600, should any Prohlems occur with transmission or receipt of facsimile. N. 811 (rf ft•rson tipo{:anc. W/1 002uO-0 180 1501)) a so-3n00 I'nx (SoQ) asb-a 7i s ~ ~ OFFICE +DF TI-iE COUN'I'Y ENGIINEER 5P4KANE CC)UN7`Y WASHIN+GTON T'O: SPOKAI"'+TE COUNTY PL4NNING L EPARTMENI'. (Current Flanning Administratar) FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: November 20, 1990 SUBJEC"T; VE-19-90, 3ohn Adrian Setback Varianc+e re: Board of Adiustment Avneal Hearing After several discussians with the applicant and his representative, the County Engineer upon review of fiarther infarmation submitted by the applicant requests that County Engineering Conditions #'s 3 and 4 be waiVed and that since dedication is not bein,g required that County Engineering Condition # 2 also be waived frc+m the previous Zaning A,djustar action on VE-19-90. This z+econsideration was based on a site sgecific analysis af the parcel in question. The applicant should be advised that should Center Road ar 5outh Riverway Avenue he widened to the apprapriate width per the County Road Standards Typical Sectinn, noase and inconvenience could pose constraints an the property because of the adjusted setbaclfs for the property. Fallowing are the recommended Engineering canditions of approval: 1. An appraach permit must be obtained from the County Engineer priQr to the construction of any new driveway approaches. This must be done prior to the release of a building permit. 2. The apglicant shali dedicate an applicable radius on Center Raad and Sauth Riverway Avenue. , • ` v~'S~~'~L~~~ C 'C-) U N 1' OrmCr•. ov Tttr COuNn• l:nic:INr•.r•.r. • A DIvitiKInt c'►F rt W 1'uiu.1C Wor.hS pt:rnKlMt:nrr I'.an.11d C. l-ioml.lnn, ('.E., Caunty L•nplWcr Ue:it1is M. Scott, t'.i:., Dirc•ctor FACSIlYl lLE COVER SHEr_l1_ DATE: TO: U ATTENTION: , - CITYISTATE: FAX NUMBER: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): , ~ FR4M: COUNTY FAX NO.: (509) 45 6-47 15 MESSAGEISPE-CIAL INSTRUCTION: ti tq~ Picase contac;t at (5{)9) 456-3600, should any problc:ms (ic:cur witli triinsinission or rccc:ipt of Cacsimilc. N Si I Vv •1 1o,, 0 11o l .A00 1 1'11- • ;(~l~ll ~ ~ ( "oa) 1 .1 "o - 17 1'% ~ s OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINSFR SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON October 16, 1990 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT.(Current Planning Administrator) F'ROM : SPOKANE COUNTY ENG I NEERpm*" SUBJ: VE-19-90, John Adrian Setback Variance re: Board of AdJustment A,pea 1 Hear i nq The County Engineer in light of furthet infozmation submitted by the applicant requests that County Engineerinq Conditions Vs 3 and 4 be waived and that since dedication is not beinq required that County Enqineerinq Condition t 2 also be Waived. This reconsideration was based on a site specific analysis of the parcel in question. The applicant should be advised that should Center Road or South Rivervay Avenue be widened to the appropriate width per the County Road 3tandards Typical Section, noise and inconvience could pose constraints on the pzoperty because of the adjusted setbacks for the property. . r ~ ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON I~'v THE MATTER OF A vARIANCE FR4M ) FRQNT AND FLANKIiNG STREET YARD ) FINDINGS OF FACT, REQUIREMENTS ) CONCLLSIONS, [vE-19-90] JOHy R. ADRIAN ) A1VD DECISION COMPANI0N FILES: N0NE ) ADDRESS: E. 7708 SOUTH RIVERWAY PARCrL NL'MBER: 06-543-223ft* APPLICATIOiv DESCRIPTION: :hc aooiicant proposes zo iocatc a ncw dwc:ling un:r .:N..Tiiviijii'uir LAle e;dsung dwcliSllgj t.0 wilillII WJ.: r ZC:: OT TIIC :ZgI1L OL wSy ~'..~IIiC.'ilI1C OL Soutl~ R.iverxay (front vard) and to witiiin 32.25 fec: of Cente: Road, (fianlang snr,..z yard); wner-.3s, sec::ions y.05.110 a. 1. and 3. oi the Spokanc Counry Zoning Ordinancr =uires r=cc-"- ;vc?y a min~um fect and 45 fat from the c: a=iinc oi thosc ngats oi way. AIIthOtILy t0 CAQSid=. Si1C1 a:~LGI c.:s~ a~-~a.znc to S~^on ~.O~Ob. oi :nc Spok~:c - CJL:..'::'✓ Cf^..~i3.':Cz. PROJEC?' LOC.VT7CN: Gea~.~i~ :x--11z~ cn :he f:,u-L`:e: st :.c m= Or Center Road., in the SW I/4 of Secdon 6, Township 25 V, R.~ngz ~ EW1tii, SpoiCane Co6~r, ~Vascungton; a,~d;ress~ as E 7708 South Rivc.-way. OPPOt~7EN'I'S OF RECORD: NONE PLBLIC HE.-kRD4G A.N-D DECISION: :A-f-Ler cons:de:='on of ail 3vaii~ic inior=ticn on fiie, exnious suomiued and tesumony r=.-ived dwring the cauix oi the puolic haring he:a on July 16, 1990, a.nd the Zonine Adiustcr :r-;d,. 3 wracn Ctcisian on Au(z...st 4, 11990 to AP°QOVE cuc aL*cu-ca.don FLNDLNGS nF FA(;T AND CON...:US?O?vc 1. Thc progosal is gc:ic-allv dcsc.-iix:i abovc. According to tfic siic pla.n wiuch has L':c =uir-..d 3nd =ucszei sc:nacics marjced in rcd, the czisring housc is in suosranaai violaaon wiih the =sc:it zoning sabacic rcgularions. The ncw dwcling unit would be a lcssc viotarion on the .-~g saw. (Cezter Road) and az=tc violarion on Souui Rivc-way (the Eonc ;ard). Cansmucton within rac required xtbacxs from bocii snrss, parec~.~l.3riy wocn thc str-.-:s intc:sec-: 3t lcss L`ian 190 ccp= angic, is virtuaiiy immsioic; c-~iniv presc,.Zting "pr~.r :cai ~ut dir:zc.uaes." Thc scuac ~nic ar~:..incid is loc~ca panially on the loc aaaoining to the the 3DclIC:I21 Si.1iGS I2L~L 3I1 CaSG'.nC.'it h3S bee:1 aCG1IIICd fOt t13t SCpIIC L311K P= of the cxisan; drsirirc:d is shown bc^cath chc cxisur.; housc. An un=ved or al=naavc c:rainnc'd sinLitcn wiil Iixcjv ix worxca oui with the F-:c.ziLh Dismic-4- Any such solunon snould cy to avoid the piacc:::er.t oi anv ar.lirsie'.d und=^=~ the d,^vcwav :or znc cx:s^ng gn=2c !into wnic:: arr.~ th c c:--u r.::e:c r.ow ex:e^ds ; . 7,he :i.1octcd SDOx.i.;,e L.;u;.►~ ~~r.:;,~^e^s;ve r,:.~, ~:e;,.~:;;:; s:.`~e ~.r-~ ~.r roce-S:,.: ds T:; ::rccese,: L;ses ,ene=lv ,-onsiste^t •~+i,^ c.s cate~:Or:. Ck SL ti O. v c- i 9-90 SPOI{A,v'E COL :viY ZONLVG ADJt; STOR PAGE? 3. T'nc sitc is zoned Ag*:cultursl Suouroan, whicn allows the prooosed usc upon a=rovai or chis appiicacon. ?'nc ioc is a prtscntiy in coniorrnance-witn the Mainir.:um stand :rds of Lnc ane. nc ex:s~:ng'.:.r,c i:ses t'.c a.*-..aoi ti~c ~rooosal inc:LCe -ciacve:,,, :or.;~: ?oc ccvc:oorr.c::c, ail oi wiuca art corr,pariolc with tnc procy..:. 5. Thc IIrcoosal is cxc=c :vm the provisions ot :.1e ~~-:cr E:Z:,,, ~ Polic•f Ac:, Chapcc.- 43.21 C RCW -;,ursuant ►o tiVAC 197-11-800 6. 7ne avvuc.ant has bcen madc aware of thc :wommc:idations or var:ous Cauncr agcnces rtvieNirig uhis projec:. Z'r.c apoiic3nt found no particular proble:r.s witii any ot the agczcy recornrncad :cromrxadaaons, cxczot tfiosc or the Counry Eag:ne..: Tnc Counry Eng~nc..: has rccommcaaai thaz i 5 fa: ot land bc dedicatai on both Svurh Rivcway and C.catc: Road. 7nc Eaginces Office, is uying to c.stablisa the addirional poraon of the haif right-of-way which wauid bring thcse res=:ivc sidcs of the sa=t io a25 ioot half nght-oi- L way in an cffort to cvcntuallv cstablis.~ a50 iooc right-of-way strccs srandard, as is required by the BOard OI CALIIIL}r COII'lID1SS10t1GeS 3dODLCd ItgII13II0IIS. TI1C 3pl1CaIIL OOJCCLS t0 IhLS IDUCj1 ~ Lard bcing dc:icaei from a small parc?, staring tbaz the prescnc sa~s are eanreiy adquatc for ~ the 3IC3 3lld Lh3L IlO 3ddlIIOt13I :Ight-oI-way ior nirarc czpansion is nccid Aftc cvaluaring p~ thcsc two oPPosing Points oi vicw, the Zaoirz ~~.,~ndards ~ Y_' n~uirrZ~ininum of a s F ','i?Ilt~t-w2v 3IC cAn~c-~nt wi hi~?onrr_? C'nun~ f~?rr?inanr~t ~ ~ waicl the Engin~s rxommcadaeons arc ar,,~~ang oD imDlcMcnr. 'I~c-~:orc, ~c d~aon ~ >Cor 7.75 ree: for boch Lvnang sa=5 wiil bc irrmosed as a candirion or' avprovaL 1 ~ 7. Tnc prooo= lcgal rcquir=cats :or advc-dsing of the hcsring bc:orc L~c Zoning Adjustcr of S ookane Counrv havc bcea ~c-- 8. No advcsc tcs~ony or wrinca c..,cn cs :~::v~ :e;. ~~:i,~~; ~~e r-~pcs~i.. 9. With the candirions of _aIIVroval sc; forth bc.'ow, the variancc will: a) r.oc cansaruw agaranc oi spc:.~ial priviic3ts incoasiszent wirh limiaaons on ochc prooc: acs in the vic.nitv 3r(i . . . . ~r*+, ior ~nn•- 1~1 rc,.,,. ri,,• ri... .L,~ '7 /1...- „ ' : - ~ . ..+.v ~ ~.r.~.. ...v .w«...~ r.r. ~v.n► v~ aw. ~Al~aiaa~ Va Wlulil~• L~ citi.1L., r ~.i '►:1:1 . regrra to Ioc.Ztion. sitc dcsign. anpcarancc, and Lanxiscaning, c:r, and c) procc..~: the cnvironment, puolic :ntcrcst and grtncal wc?farc. 10. T'nc Counry eng+.r:cz: rouanciv recommcnds dlat various land usc a~.~.ions uiacrer , dedicarions or funuc a;ht-oi-way acquisidons sumcerit to br:ng adjace::c mad riznc-0i-wavs up io rr.inirnum Cournv stana.zrr.s. Various l::nd use ncarin; boc.ies rour:r:e:v :t^L:rz suc.: recam.n:eZ=r-ons as conc:t. Jons oi aDVroval. ~':e var:.~:c::'Niil be r.e:L^~ ^-.~rr^..~ilvi ce injurious ,o ~,-ropcr^! or irnprovc:nc^u in the vlc:niry and zonc.. I=. Sa:c: ao~iicaaon ot L'~e zoning s;a..zrds does c:crte an urmcrsonaoie buraea in lig::: or ;."e ,uroosc~:o 'oe se:^rc; bv the stanc :i~~.s. ~ GASc v0. VE-19-90 SPOK~ti`E COLNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGz 3 13. The case for the variance was not supportai by subszanaal referencr, to vr reliance upon iilcg3l or non-coniorming prxxeat(s). 14. Gr-anang the varianc:: will noc advc:selv aff= the ove.-ail zoning desip, plan or conc.---t :or c.chc: the immc.c3tc arm vr tc cna.Tc C,ountv. 125. ?'nc casc for a variancr was not bascd suos=nallv upon a:acx ot r-,: s;nablc wonomic rc:urn nor a ciai,m that the exisrn` s~ .:c~.rr :s :Do su.ai" 416. The practipl difficulry w'tuch P*-vcs ::sc :o cre var:anc: c:c cr"s: ixicr ;:~e prescnt owncr acquireti the proQety. 17. Various pcriormancx srandards and circria arc addiaonally neeied tn makc the usc cotlnnariblc with octer pm=i=d actvirics in the samc vic.niry and zonc and to casznt a~inst imposing czces,sivc dc=ds upon puolic utiliacs and thcsc shall bc addressed as canditions of apgrvvaL DECISION From the foregoing Findings and Conclus;ons, ;.A.cJi:s:cr A-'?'R0VES the =vvosal, suojec: to c,omplianc.: witn thefollowina C0N"DTTIONS OF kPPROVAL L GE-tiERAL 1. i~~e ~oi~owin~ c~aditons Snall aDcly to L'~e ;:rpiican~ own~ 3r.d s~:c:z~ s in 3I1G S:lall un WllSl tC :3I1d- . • . . r3i.iurc ;a c=iy with any ot tnc coadirions oi av proval cantainai in rbis d=,scn, as may bc itiicvad by the Zoning Adjussor, saall cansrimtc a violarion vf tfic Zoning 4rdinanc- and be suojec: to sucs cnfor=mcat as is appropriam. . The Zoaing .Adjusoor may adminisaativcly mak~ minor ad~ustmc~ts to sitt plans or the canditions of avprovai as may bc judgd to bc within the contczt ot the original dccision IL PLAiNMNG DEPAR'I'MEN'I' 1. 7nc ncw dwciIing su-uczut should bc Iocatcd as far cast and sauth as possblc, in ort'.= to ±-rnt and flmk-.ng sm-,c: setbacks, parnicuiarv in lig~t or ~ e^g.t-or-way dcdicauons. 2. Tne D1; rs.i.~ g ~ar~:~e^t s.ail t: i:l:s ior new c;ns~ ~c~cn u, lcast the apwovcd sc;bacics with ;-zD= m ap pl,rn,cd ro~anway ccntc: iinc r.casur=cats cr corr.parsblt proper^! line se:bacic, pnor anv de: icanon oi ;igat-or-way. C.ASE v0. VE- I9-90 SPOKANE CflUNTY ZONUiG ADJLTSTOR PAGE 4 M. DEPARTMEV'I' OF BUILDING & SAFETY 1. T?zc issuanc.-- of a buiiding ?c.-mit by thc TJepar-anent of BuiIding and Safc.y is rcauire~. . Iv. UTII.ITIES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to thc Board of Counrv Cornmisroners Rcsolurion No. 80-0418, :hc ::sc of on-sitic stwc: disDOSaI sysums is hereby authorii,cd. 'Ihis authonzarion is coaairioned on compIiancc with all nilcs and :cguiations of tfic Sookanc Counry Heaitfi Disaict and is furthc candiaonc:i and suojcc: to s:pccinc aIIplicarion amarovai rrc :ss~.:^lc~ cr :c-~-~.iu L,v ~c H=m T",. . ~ ~ n v • rR ~ ~er~~ r t~,c ~yvv,VY-~ ~a ~ r i 1J1 ~ 'rV~}y .n.+ 'Il~~r ~iU~ :laa-~ J4~r♦ JUi.LL ~c ud ~Warct System Plan for Spokam County, a.s Czordinated 3. The new dwelin g unit sha.ll be doublc-oI= callcctiori svscm~>J . v. HEA.LTH DISTRIt;'Y' 1. SewacIrc dis-,,;os.-2 nn.c.hod s:1ai1 be as aut~or~ bv the Dir=,cr of Uailties, Sookrne Counry. ~ . 2. Waier scrvicz shail bc caomd'uiaxd tfirougn thc Dir=or of Uaiincs SpoYanc Counry. 3. Water scvicz shail be by a/3n exisring/ntw public wamr suoply wnen unvreve:~ 'I-v the Regional Eagi.necr(Sre'.^e;, 5=_- or Scc..ai 'HP- th Se:-ric~ 4. Disposal of stwaac -:ilie ;L :}Cnr3Yed 11-U111--:.crs :s ~Lv ~rcr~icir.e?. Preferably, tfie dminne?d shouid not be Iocatr.i wncre it wouid bc paved over u a dm-f_-Wa°r 5. Suoj~: :0 5DeC'•IlC 3L`P11C1Q4II 3D~I,JVal 3IIQ LSSu3II~ OI ~,'C^"ILS Ov ~:le :e.~'t~ officer, thc usc of an individua.t on-siu scwagc ais~osai syszc~(s) may bc authorizcd. i~c Dis~ic: nc~s to at~vrovc thc usc of thc cristin; or mod'uicd disposal systcm ar ar=vc a totaily new systc= vI. SPOKA'VE COUNTY ENGINEER'S 4FrICE `r 1. An approach pc:zut raust be ooaincd from thc Counrv Engincer pnor '►o cnc constrsc:ion of any ncw dnvcway approacacs. lhis must 5c donc prior to cfic : c:c= of a building Pk....;it - .~~_ns1^•.li.. ' ~{lr`r r'l .i.N ~`.^t.~ .V(~. rl '1'1~:C~. AIJVlICJi`t 5i- a.1 C^{1 r7 7 Y C~Sz v0. VE- I 9-90 SPOKA'vE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGz 5 'The ownc:(s) or suc: essor(s) in intc-tst agx co authoriu the Countv to plam their narr.c;s j on a pcdnon for nc formarion or a Road irnorovcmcnt Dismict (RID) by the pczirion ! ' mc;nod pursuant to Cnapter 36.88 RCW, wnic:z pctiaon inc:udcs the owncr(s) propG-cy, and ~ fur,hc: not to obj= bv cre sigr ing oi a balloc, the forr:.ation ot a RID by the resoiurion me:hod pursuant :o Ciapu: 36.88 RCw, w'tucl rzsolution indludcs the owncr~s) pro=:y. If an RID is tormai by citti~ Lhc xdrioa or resoluaon me:nod, as provicd for in Cha~tc: 36.38 \ RC~', c.~:e ownc^{s) or suc :essor(s) fiuthcr agrce: ~ . . ~ ♦ A rr.r C r. pa,+-..i ^f f ari • 1 1 7 (I cr c-c-cn • ~'1 c.,r.......,....._.. •~tsr ~_e Mcost:~ .s fcasioIe; ' x::e:~ :c ~ ~r:. .e :~.~r-: :Lcr ci- --.e . C= ~ v ..:e -,T-- cC-7i inc:udca thamn, togc:hcr with the armunt oi any County parucpar-on, czc::-..:.s u.c czs 3r.d cxpcnse oi formarion oi the RID; and (3) that the proper:y arithin the proposc:i RID is sufficicntiy devc?oJ... Provided furtcr tha,t the owncr(s) or succcssar(s) shall remin the right, as authorized undcr RCW 36.88.090, ro objccs io any asscssmcac on the propcrry as a resuit of the imgrovc=cats called for in conjmcaon with the farmazion of the RID by cithc pcarion cr resolurion mcthod undw Cbapta 36.88 RCW. This rcauir=rnt ar . plics Lo South Rivuway Avcnuc or Ccnnrr Road wbichcvcr the subjca par~f takr.s accm 3. AFDIicant shail dediooc 7,75 fat oa Cr3tc Road for right-of-wav. I , 4. Applicanc saail dedic3te 7.75 fas on Soutii Rivc-way for right-of-way. 5. Thc appli(mnt shaIl dcdicau a agpiicabk :adius on Cea~ Road and Svuth RivcwaY ~ Avcnuc. NOTI~: PEVDING COMPL...L'TION OF ALL CONDiTIONS OF A.PPROVAL WFUG~i Nr TO BE C4MPLr.1 r.J PRIOR TO PERUMI'T ISSUANCV PSR.Wl'S MAY BE E, T:4Sr D- PRIOR TO ilffi IAPSE 4F THE TERN ( IO)-DAY APPEAI. PSUOD. HOWEti'ER, THE COLivTY HAS N0 LIABILM FOR EXPENSES Al'YD INCO Y(M INCLTRRED BY = APPLC~N7 1F THE PQOJECi' AP°QQVAI. IS OVERTL'R.N OR AI.T= L-?CNA-PpE kL. DA=, tnis *i aav oi .-~ugusL 190. , - , , ~OMA5 G. MOsiMR. AIO Z,oning Adjustor ` Sookane Counry, Wasningson r'-7i 177-: ~ ~ .~cciic.:nc c C.;-.~^ed'Rc^.:rn Rcc=pc 1Lii~ ~ . ► - GASE NO. V'E-19-90 SPUKANE COtJNTY Z,OM1vG ADNSTaR PAGE 6 S pvkauc Coumy Enginar'S Officx j) Spokane Counry Hcalth Disaicz 4) S vokar►e Counry Utilitics Dcpartnzenr 5} Saokane Counry D+cparcmcat af Buiicciing & Safcry 6} S pokanc Cvuntv Fn c Proccction Distrct Na. 1 i~ Plarming Dcpart=at C.-os.s-rei=ncr F1c and/vr Elr..cronac Filc ~i[7T~: ONI.Y 'IHE A.PPI.ICAN'I' OR AN C)PP(7NEN'I' OF RECORD MAY FMZ AN ,AP'PEAL, WT'= T24 (I4) CAI..~..~AR DA YS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGiWING. APP'EAI. WST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A SI40.00 F .."',t. APPEAI.S MAY BE FILM AT T'rE 5POKrUNE C][JNTY PLAuNNNG DEPART~vtE.'VT, BRDADWAY CEN7RE BL`ILDIING, NORTH 721 JEFr-ERSON S'I=, SP'C?KANE, WA 99250 tScctivas 4.? 5.09U and 4.25.100 af thc Spoka.ac Counry ?.oniag C?rdinance). • ~ ' ~ } , ~?l,~i ~ ~ 1 1T f' V 1 1'r NvTIcAvi To TxE PUBL;C ~ .'AiC.~E Z.u..:.:11 AND CDVE;'IA`1 Ti 3'{ T Th.at .~.C.r. y s•i. v!.,2 ~s c_ -oT._.cwr .4; de.r7c.s.-.e+-.. lGri.r.J ~.2 ~vi.r~.~.~:'r~.~Vi• li• 14-..rrva? _E:.^.2_' ::j z2 deriVed GD fJ: :^e:.Se?'IeS, C:'1e4r he~.:51 Qr.ic^.Le°5, GSJ1..aa..:K7 a.,~ L: c ~ a s s cr s *nre_ sereby * ag.pe Co Qu4+:o~Lwy~e SoVi4a,....e S+{~~iicf L`/ 7lGi4... La~lc.i~s ~res~ ;l .~~=-a~.7) Lr, Gpt~!:~.Vn fo4 rhG fVrri.~.t~on Vw 47r 7%cCid T+a+pi.Vv4mG•C4 J~J4~~VL {s1_D~ ~~c ~e c =e:r;;d ou: suanc Co C::a?cer 36.88 3CW, wnich pecitivn in.c? uces che cwr.er(s) a::: ohe= r.or to oojec:, oy che sa.g^ing af aba??oc, Go the war=a:f.oa o.: a R:D :y che :escZucion med:od pursuanc Co Chaoter 36.88 RN, w•nich resolut'cn M ~ V dG S b ~ e 1.! 'M ne (s) ?.aper`f. T G RID is orWed by e#ther che pet_v4mn or :e sc~•,:_~.r^ ac, as P-ovideC zor {n Chap ter 16.88 RN, t ue owre,(s) o: successc:(s) ;u:wzer ag.ep. M ch-ac the improvements or const:uction conte=p?aced ?:apose? RID are feasibla, that the be^efits ta be derived : ro= che che ?t:D by the p.oger`y {ac?uded ehere{n, tagec.her wich che anau:~ af ar.f CcL: cy ?arz-4cipac;on, exceeds che cost and expense ot :or=acion af t:te RTD, ar.d (3) c::ac cae property wirh;a t::a p:opased RID {s sufficie,^,t?y develoged. P:ovided, ~urc :e: , t:a aWne: (s) or successor{s} shall retaiz 4he rignt, as autt:or'xed under :tN 3:6.38.090, ta objec: to any assessaezc(s) an che praperty as a resu?t of the ~~Drcverc.:xcs ca?led for in conju: c.ian •~rith che fc~~:at{on or a 3~D oy eit: e= che petwtion a: :eso?ucion --et`:od under Chante: 36.$8 RCW and to ampeal tv the Sc;pe:~or Cour;. :^a cec:s~an a~ the Board ot C4uncy Coamiss:oners af f i {ng the final assess=:ezc rv-1:.. .r r . T~ i s : u: : : agraed tha4 at suc : ti=e as an RIJ is c: eated cr any 3oad Tmprove=ent 'ro,; ec : ws sa::c =io:.ed oy 5aakane Cau :.y, thle i=praveme.^,ts : erLi: ed (curb, si Cewzlk, a ? ::a!L-1~ zro? aad p av _^g ta e.tistf ^g pavemenr) srall 'De a4 the sa? e e:cpense oi e~:^'.~.,:?'~:.Q :c.'•~ OGi*:e: , Che{ r ie{ w S, $:2:1MeeS 2Ad SSSig::5 Wi C:1+DL1C aL'y :::OT:et3I`'f Pa: :=c_`;;,:.:_4o: by Spokane Councy. i?-~e F% D waive: COrICa{?:Qd ia thrs agreemer.t sha1l expi~e alOce: ten (I0) yea~s t-an che Caca o+ exac::r :on be? 4w.~' Hcweve. , ac the e:tpi:at,an dace tae 4w;.er(s} o: sLCeessC; (s) ageEe to construct the revui:ea i--Prove^e^.ts aw th.ei:: own e: jease; PaY -Ca 5pcka: e Cauncy t:e the : estimated cvst Qf che required :m.prvvements to enab"se the Ccu::~*7 c.- -p ? e a e t;-ze sa=e; ar *::rz{sh a band or ac :e: secsre -_ac::ad sui ta~I.e tv che CVu^;, f, provid;ng or secur?r.g co che CcunGy the aecuaw cor.scrac:.;on cf che 'ra_~v~re::4s. . ='~,2 v~~-~ ::o^d-;.:~cr.s a::d eave^.aac apv?y co the fall.owing des~r-lbed pro;aerty; . ~ J / . / / / ~ These ,equi:e^ents are and shall run ai:a t::e la::c ad snal'_ '--e •,:-:,cr. / ow;.e-s, the'__ :e'_=s, s~ccessors o- assyg.^.s. i ha•, e;ze_ eu:.to se ~ ar.C (s) anc sea~ ;s) da• a= , 19 . , ST.A. TZ OF ; , ::ie ~ :G~'✓;.:ud..lSj :r:..^. L':{2z eC ~:C:.:.~ : z :.:.^re and acknowledged the said iast:ument to be the free and voiuntary act and ceed c~ said individual(s), for the uses and purposes thereia meationed. Given unde: my hand and seal this day of , 19 . Vocary rubl;c :n azd 'fo: ::e Sca:; ot residing at , ~ Z DNINGADJ UST a R SPC1KANE +~(3UN'"Y, ~'V.~SHIi,I~GT~JN r ~ a ~ IN THE MAT"TER OF AN AMENDED { l~ CiRIA:t~CE FR1J1~'~ FRV~e 1 A;TIJ ~ ~7►~lEi"1~DED FLAtiKI'tiG STREET YARD REQUIREME:tiTS ~ DECISZUiN [VE-19-90] JOHiN R. AI7RIAN ) ADDRESS: 7708 EAST 5OUTH RIVERWAY PARCEL NU.: 06*43-2234 BACKGRflUND INFOR:~iATlOtifi: i ne or:gznal decisian on thzs fi1e was issuCd on Augjst 9,1990. T'nis w2ls a rcrivd of rime durdn; which rhe Zc►nina Adiustor was an vacacian, havin; previousiv dictaeed the ~ aecisian. The decision was signed and distri'Duced withouc 3 fourth cvndition of acproval Lxsted unc'er I'v . v-1-9.~T'iFS DE?.~RT.~tE:°NT. 'I'he Ualiaes 17eparrmenc had r'---orumenced Lhe inclusian of one of che;r szancard cvnditions associatcd tvith the acuife: sensiave area, ove:Iay zane and the rcquz.rezrent :or a condidon invvlvin¢ an a,gree:rent tv parnic;pate in thG farmauan of a sewer dissict at sueh ame as onz mi¢ht be pmposed. Tnis russ:ng = canc:ition was discovered during ►he process of pr~~.,3hna rhe fiie cor an Uc~ooe: 17,1990 a~peal hearing. CQ NSEQLTENTLY, THE DE CISYOiN fQr VE- I4-90 is formaliv amenced:o inc?ude the faliawing condidon vt agprvval: TV. UTILITIES DEPAR'I'tiIENT ne owne:(s) vr sucwVssor(s) in interest a.a:.--. tQ authorize c:se Caur,:y to pIacc the~r naxr,e(s) an apeaaon f-For the tflrmaaon of 3 L1I1) by ~e::rivn metizad, p~sua.~:c .c~ RC~*+~ 3b.94,whac:~ petiaan includes -::e owre~s} pmpe:ty; and fur.he; ~ac ~o object bw te sienina of a procest periaan a..ins: the Llcrmauan of a ULID bv 42-sOiUtion me:had, pu:sL,.,%nc cv RCW Cha,pce: 36.94, which inciudes the awne:(s) prope:~. PR.(]VME~.7, rhis cond;z:on shail not prohibit t.he vwne:(s) or succwssar(~) from objection :o any assesst-nent(s) on u eprope.rv as a resuit at imorovernents calIed for in conjunc;ion wili-c the tor.r.acon o'Ll a L-L1: bv ei:he.• -%eudon or resaluuon mcinad under RCW C'napce;.' )6.9-4. , N47ICE: PE:'~-D NG C'QWI.=I4N OF ALL CQNDITIONS OF APPROVAL, WHI-i i`1'EED TO BE CO'ilviPLETED PRiQR Ta PEIRNi.IT ISSUANCE, PERNiTTS %LAY BE RE? ZaSErJ PRIOR TU THE L-\PSIE 4F ( IQ)-DAY APPEAT., PERIOD. HC?'~7='VER, TFIE C01-7N,TY H.AS ~iC3 LL-\BII.ITY F{7R EXPENScS AN-D ~ INCnNVE:tiIE:VCE 11-N+CURRED BY THI APP'LICANi 1F ±'rlE PROJECT APPRf]VAL IS OVERTURN OR ALTER.ED Tj'PO N APPF~L. I ~ Dated this dav of Seote:nbe:, 1990. . ~ ThTC)~M:~S\G. ",40SHcR* AiL? L-:_f'o"izii7~ L~ j uSi. G' ~ Spok:n~ ~ounty, Was^ina*an FILE vE-19-90 ZONING ADJUSTOR ANiEyDED DECISION pAcE ? ~ f ~ FZED. 1) AcDlicani (=aned/rctum =eicc maii) Spokane County Enginccr's Office 3) Spokanc Counry Hcalth District 4) S pokanc County Utilidcs Dcpartmenc S) Sookane Counry Dcpar=crt or Build.ing and Sarerf 6) S pvkanc Counry Firc Protccaon Disrric: No. 1 7) Planning DeparQnent cross-rtfeztnce iile or elec~onic fiIe NOTE: QNZY THE .4PPLIC~~IT OR .aN OPPOyEN'I' OF RECORD ti1AY FiLE :~V A P°E.-\ L WITHIN TLv (IO) C-\I.tVDAR D A Y S OF T'rlE A BOvE DATE OF SIGvI:G. ( A.PPE.-\i. yiUST BE ACCO~'.~~D BY A S100.00 FEE. APPE.,kLS titrkY BE FII.ED A: T"c-iE SPOKANE COL-N= PL,ANLNING DErART.tiiENT, BROr1DWAY C."--v7R E ~ BGILDNG, 721 YORTH JEFFERSOv STREET, SPOK.-0T. WA 99260 (Secrions 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 oi the Spokane County Zonin; Ordinance). rC'1 . conKa~vc :n;v u c. .~L-u nTCrorr- _ ~ Trltor_7*Firo I'nnr.~`nir~ r:^.^. I ~1 rr r~ V~I vr I , 1990 TC. 7~n .r.;;~ac ;4Cic~Or tv~~nr! ~~S~v~ .:i..••.v. ° , ~n~i . _ . . . • , ~ ~ - FROM: Michael 4. Antee~R - = :~ri 1~~i~, ~ ~ v ~~~er~ , ~~di e:l~,i SU8JEC7: Proposed Variance: VE-19-90 (Adrian) and Appeal to t^e ooard or Ad j us u-nent Rer+ ~ ~o~i ~n 1116 , thc I'nnr. +:':+;o i III Tf1 on i' ~ar,. , ess p s ,..n ,n.c i U,.. c , "~s :-..4 re:r.er ~ for the aforementioned varianc2, the Health Oistric:t's ULiJ wil i 5e required prior to any issuances of the on-sit-a sewage sys tem. pe it and Lhe bui lding permit. c: 0 i recto r of Utib1 i ti es , Spokane County . 8oa rd of Ad j ustment, Spoicane County John R. Adrzan E. 7708 South Ziverp.-; : Spokane, WA 99212 t i ' 0722P/ps I - { 1 ; , i i ~ ; ~ i 1 • ~ ~ I i I ~ ~ L%W GFF - I.E.3 'NiLLIAM PCWE! - POWELL & MORRIS 7 E_c?~ C; `:c JEFF A MORRtS A PRpF:5510NAL SERVtCE CORPORATION 509a 355 908C tARRY J KUZNE-Z WEST 220 MAIN AVENUE F4X MICHAEL M P4RKEP' 'r7CD A STARTZ_L SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 •O1 12 -5091 455•85~.- Bq1AN C 3ALCH 7t COunsei -.w"C . ~~.G--~ Oc tober 10' 1990 L ; ~ ~ CEi "'D , ' OCT 12 1990 SPOKANE COUNTY EPtGtNIr~ Mr. Robert Binger ` Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Civil Division West 1115 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Decision of Zoning Adjuster, VE-19-90 Concerning E. 7708 South Riverway & Appeal Therefrom Dear Mr. Binger: I represent John and Debbie Adrian concerning their variance request to allow construction of a new home in the Millwood area and the subsequent granting of that variance with numerous conditions attached. Pursuant to a telephone conference with you on September 6, 1990, I indicated Mr. Adrian's objections to the conditions put upon his variance request as granted on August 9, 1990, by Thomas Mosher, the zoning adjustor. A brief review of the facts I believe are necessary in order to apprise you of the reasons for writing this letter. Mr. & Mrs. Adrian own a corner lot situated at E. 7708 South Riverway near Felts Field. A home is currently situated on the lot in which the Adrians reside. The home is in violation of current zoning standards concerning set backs, however, the home was constructed before the zoning ordinances were enacted and, therefore, it is grandfathered. The lot itself is not uniform in that each side is a different length. The lot is fronted by South Riverway Street and flanked on the East by Center Road. I The Adrians filed a variance so they could build a new home on the lot, but due to the dimensions of said lot the home would be within 40.25 feet of the right-of-way center line for South Riverway an.~ within 32.25 feet of the center line of Center Road. It should be noted that any new construction on the lot for a home of any siz~ would be in violation of the set back requirements due to th,.:- irregular lot size. While both Center Road and South Riverway are paved, they are non-arterial residential streets. On August 9, 1990, the zoning adjuster granted the Adrian's request for the variance on the set backs to allow construction of a new home on their lot. The Adrians, of course, do not dispute the granting of the variance and agree that all elements necessary for 1 . Mr. Robert BinQer Page 2 October 10, 1990 the granting of the same were present. However, pursuant to recommendations of the engineering and health department the zoning adjustor made findings in a decision which attached conditions to the variance. I have enclosed for your reference a copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, Decision and Amended Decision of the Zoning Adjustor. The Adrians specifically have appealed the conditions contained in Section VI, paragraphs 2, 31 4 and 5 of the original Decision and Section IV, paragraph 4 of the Amended Decision concerning an ULID. My purpose in sending this letter is to raise concerns about the legality of the aforementioned conditions imposed upon the Adrian' s variance. I will address each condition in order as follows: Paragraph 2 of Section VI of the adjustor's Decision requires tre Adrians to sign and record an agreement for petition of the formation of the Road Improvement District (RID) pursuant to RCR 36.88. I have enclosed a copy of the agreement which the Adrians were requested to sign in order to obtain a variance. The Adrians object to Notice No. 6 as it is called because of numerous def iciencies and inaccuracies contained within it. First of all, the Adrians cannot in good conscience truthfully sign a document agreeing that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible. RCW 36.88.072 requires that any waiver of protest must specifically indicate the improvements to be f inanced by the district. Since a RID has not been developed, no one knows the improvements that will be made, let alone whether they are feasible. Secondly, paragraphs 2 and 3 of Notice No. 6 provide the improvements made shall be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner without participation by Spokane County. That proviso is in direct violation of RCW 36.88.072 which proscribes that: "It is against public policy and void for an owner, by agreement, as a condition imposed in connection wit: proposed property development, or otherwise, to waive the rights to object to the property owners individua~ assessment (including the determination of specia: benefits allocable to the property),". The aforementioned statute allows the owner to seek monies from Spokane Count-,ri ~.-~,,`r ,,-•.,n.-,_-_, _ a~~_ .~a•,~o~~ C.- improvements. Paragraph 3 of Document No. 6 likewise is void for the same reasons. It is unconscionable to require an owner to make a "required improvement" at his own expense after the expiration of ~ i ) Mr. Robert Binger Page 3 October 10, 1990 the waiver of protest. By its own terms, the document is only effective for ten years and, therefore, the county cannot put conditions in the agreement which will affect the property owner after the expiration of ten years. The final argument as pertains to the Document No. 6 is that the waiver of protest has no relationship to the variance requested and therefore, should : ct be a condition attached to the granting of the variance. The Adrian's objections to paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of Section VI of the adjustor's decision all involve dedication of property of the Adrians to the city for purposes of right-of-way. My understandinc is that Spokane County Ordinances require that all residentia- streets have a minimum 50 f oot, and a maximum 60 f oot right-of -way. The engineers office has recommended that the Adrians dedicate 7 3/4 feet on the flanking and front sides of their lot in order t:-, conform to a 50 foot right-of-way required by the Ordinance. The first contention raised by the Adrians is the County's taking o~ that 7.75 feet on two sides of their lot constitutes unlawful taking without just compensation. There has been no consideration given to the Adrians for the taking of that property. Secondly, the County's reqeust for dedication of additional property f or a roadway right-of -way while at the same time relaxing the set backs for the Adrians variance to build their home is inconsistent. Essentially the adjustor's decision is stating thar the Adrians can build their house closer to the street only if the County is allowed to obtain land so they can have the street closer to the house. By granting the variance on the set backs, there is no practical way that the County could use the additional 7.75 feet requested for the right-of-way. If they did use the full amount requested for the right-of-way, the sidewalk and/or curb would be on Mr. Adrian's doorstep. My conversations with the engineer's office have indicated that there is at this time no proposal to improve or widen Center Road or South Riverway. I think you will agree that at no time wili there ever be a need for widening of those streets. Clearly, the county is exacting the 7.75 feet of riqht-of-way so that at some undefined future time they may widen the same. This fact combined with the reality that the streets cannot be widened due to the variance granted to the Adrians makes the County's request for dedication of the right-of-way invalid. Unless the County has some definite plans for development of that area which would require in this specif ic instance 50 f oot right-of -ways ; the dedication of the land by the Adrians is an unconstitutional taking. See Unlimited v. KitsaD Countv, 50 Wn. App. 723, 750 P.2d 651 (1988). I - Mr. Robert Binger Page 4 October 10, 1990 The Adrians final objection concerns paragraph 4 of Section IV of the Amended Decision, which indicates the Adrians must agree to waive opposition to any petition for the formation of a ULID purs uant to RCW 36.94. Upon my review o f RCW 3 6. 9 4, I f ind no authority which would allow the County or any other public agency to require property owners to waive any protest concerning a petition for the formation of a ULID. Unlike the RID statute, there is no waiver of protest authorization contained in the ULID statutes pursuant to RCW 36.94. It also came to my attention that Spokane County does not use the petition method for purposes of forming ULIDs. Therefore, there is no need to have such an agreement and/or covenant executed. Most, if not all, ULIDs in Spoknae County are formed by the resolution method. There is no authority in RCW 36.94 which allow,- the County to require the Adrians to waive their protest rights f cf a ULID as a condition for granting a variance. It is my understanding that the proper procedure would be to allow the Adrians a design deviation due to the unique circumstances of their case. The design deviation would eliminate the conditions required by the health department and engineering department which are attached to the Adrians variance. I believe that if all parties concerned will review the specifics of the Adrians case, they will note that not only are the conditions to be imposed by I the engineering office and health department invalid, they are impractical. These issues will come before the Board of Adjustment on the Adrian's appeal October 17, 1990. It is my hope that this situation can be resolved prior to that hearing to the satisfaction of all parties concerned. Once you have had the opportunity to review this letter, please contact me so that we may discuss the matter. Very truly yours, POWELL & MOR.RIS, P.S. /%~'t ~ ,~C~-- . r' uichael M. Parker ~ -v'vr10 _ n, e Z ^n~ i ~:..U r~J ...1 ~ cc: iXr. & Mrs. John Adrian Spokane County Enginesring Dept. Attn: Robert McCann & Pat Harper 1 C ; ' ~'.Y~~il 'v 1 y PLANNING DEPARTMENT `y ox'i 9~ry~*T~~~ BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET tx.~:--•,- A~ ~,.:a5a r 1r PHONE 456-2205 tja~^ '.F ~r.a , _ y•, 17,~ ~ pii! -~Ty a • ' " ! r :.i.. H SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKANE COUNTVC0UR7M0U5E "I'o : Pat Harper, SpOkaIlZ COL1I1Ly EI10g111eE;r's Ofhce Michael Antee, Environmental Health Division, Spokarle County Healtll District Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Department I FROM : homas G. Mosher, AICP, Zoning Adjustor DATE : September 19, 1990 i, SUBJECT : Setback Variance File No. VE-19-9U John R. Adrian Appeal Hearing This memorandum serves as ofticial ilotificauon that this case has beeii appealed to the Boarc? of Adjustment and will be heard on October 17, 1990. Your departments/agencies would se,.°::-: to have quite a vested interest in the manner in which this appeal is handled by the Board of Adjustment. I urge you to formulate specific responses to the Board of Adjustment, presenting them either in writing or in person. Please be in touch with Robbin at 6035 regarding the exact time of the hearing. She also sends information to the Board of Adjustment members, and if you wish to have anything in writing to them in advance of the hearing, please be in touch with her regarding that timing. As you are most likely aware, I recently amended the decision in the above matter to include standard condition of the Utilities Department which was inadvertently left out of the decisioi l. That condition is the one with respect to the ULID agreement. I believe, from the wording orl the appellant document, that the applicant will wish to appeal the imposirion of that condition, so the Planning Department is describing that condition of approval as being appealed by the ~ applicant. fcu Attachment I a ~ i (OF I~~( ~ ~ , .~~01 PLAr'\iN1NG UEFARTrv1EiJT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILOING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET ~~g-at 4~~•t~~' "M~~y ~ ll_ '~~f~~~~'~ ; `i] - - lo : Sp0kaI1e C.OllI1Cy hI1glI1C;er's Utticc Spokane County Health District Spokane County Utilities Departmen t Spokane County Department of Building and Safety Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 , FROM : rThomas G. Mosher, AICP, Zoning Adjustor ~ DATE : September 19, 1990 ~ SUBJECT : Setback Variance File No. VE-1 9-90 AI": 1M011 The above case is under appeal and will be heard by the Board of Adjustment on October 17, 1990. In the process of reviewing this file and preparing to make a report to the Board of Adjustmen;. I noticed that one of the conditions of approval intended to be placed in the decision was inadvertently left out. Therefore, the attached document officially amends the decision of August 9, 1990, as indicated therein. Note that this extends the appeal period for this particular condition for 10 days after the signing of the decision. Since the applicant has appealed Utilities Condition No. 1, and this added uriliries condition (on the amended document) is very closely related to the appeal statement made by the applicant, the Planning Department will advertise that the applicant is also appealing Utiliries Condition No. 4(the new utilides condition). If the applicant does not wish to contest the fourth utilities condidon of approval, the Board of Adjustment simply does not have to address it. Using this concept, we can continue to the public hearin(i on the scheduled date. fcl~ C: 1olin R. Acli-iail, Applicant, 7708 I:;tst St~t;tii Spokan~--,, W'A 90? :~tt;iC'~1I11c'IiC I ~ ZONIN(i f1DJUSTOR SPOKANE C()UN'I'Y, WASIIINGTON IN THE MATTER OF AN AINIENUL:ll j VARIANCE FROM FRONT AND j :1.N I E' D L l) FLANKING STREET YARD REQUIREMENTS ) D E C IS IO N [VE-19-90] JOHN R. ADRIAN ) ADDRESS: 7708 EAST SOUTH RIVERWAY PARCEL NO.: 06543-2234 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The original decision on this file was issued on August 9, 1990. This was a period of rime during which the Zoning Adjustor was on vacation, having previously dictated the decision. The decision was signed and distributed without a fourth condition of approval listed under Iv. UTILI'ITES DEPARTIv1ENT. The Utilities Department had recommended the inclusion of one of their standard conditions associated with the aquifer sensitive area overlay zone and the requirement for a condition involving an agreement to participate in the formation of a sewer district at such time as one might be proposed. This missing condition was discovered during the process of preparing the file for an October 17, 1990 appeal hearing. CONSEQUENTLY, THE DECISInN for VE-19-90 is formally amended to include the following condition of approval: IV. UTILITILS DLPt1RTNILNT 4. The owner(s) or successor(s) in intcrest a("Tree to authorize ttie County to place t}ieir name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method, pursuant to RCW 36.94,which petition includes the owner(s) property; and further not to object by the sign in` -~a protest perition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method, pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, which includes the owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall nc~: prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property a: result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a iJLM bv either petitil or resolution method under RCW Chap NOT'ICE: PENDING COiV11'LETION OF ALL CONDITIONS Or APPROV~ W.1-IICI-I NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE RELEASED PRIOR TO 1'HE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER,1'HE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF TI-TE PRQJECT APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL. fih Dated this day of September, 1990. THOMA G. MOSHER, AICP ning Adjustor Spokane County, Washington e ~ F1LE vL-19-90 "LUNING ADJUS'I'vIZ AMENDED DLCISIUN PAGE 2 FILED : 1) Applicant (certified/retum receipt w," : i, 2) Spokane County Engineer's Office 3) Spokane County Health District 4) Spokane County Utilities Departi i 5) Spokane County Department of Bui1di11g and Safety 6) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 7) Planning Department cross-reference file or electroilic file NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, 721 NORTH JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance). fcu V~ ~ ~ ~ , • _ ` vt~ ov-J c ~ o-- ea7 /C. c e y 4 o w~ o~ ~ t~ y ♦ ~ . ~i► , i ~ lo e !.L iC;k r r v ~ Q~ J ~ - ~ _ . , _ , . ~ ~ / ~ 4.i ~ ~ r.+ lj V ~O'1.. ~ J. u S' vv- .S c►-^ ~ ` , . ~ _ _ _ - . ~ . - ~ d ~ ~ • ~ •,r. e ~ ~i C~✓ ~ `7 ~ ~ C O [.~l r? % c.. . , P x' c ~cr- ~ C 1 ~ ot t~r ~ / v1 ,f I /5 /~..~c ~ / o►~' - ,/r r-- t" ler ~ . ! ` / ~ ~ ~~r• • J ~ y re 4'"`4 _ip / G I . ~ . \ ZONE q oCwE" I ~ z~ o ~ . . ~ M I ~ u bi W Z a o a ~ a o ~ 0 a ; J - _ . , - - I o. x dt q ~ ~ ~l DRtYE n r :A6~ Sp_. ~ . ( KI RN}~►N~C`~. 1v~ ` X ZON~ I ~ ~ L EE Q WA V`~ y❑ 1j . ` ^v -s EATY ~ I W Y ~ ? O U 0 W r j O J' ~ ] q ~ w rJ" . ~_~_o w A ~ T~ 1 N ~j % aVE U 'r ft ~ r . IYCf FA Y -W a tj Y r ' 1 } - ite y?~~ Bv ~ ~ - g0//v MAR~ A ~ AYE , I ~ 7 MONT; A C,eRClSCE ~t ~ ~ o Q 4°// ~1 ZONE C--~,_ r ` ~~~JL._~ < w ~1►t~,~'~~--y-~~ , - . . - . a - ~ t,EW15~ oIcK ELTON _ ' 90 _ : 0 1 g eo~yVAY ZQNE " W - _ z - 40 jA_VJlE ~,n I .A~__---- ` z - - ~ I r VAL.:~Y UMI OF STUDY jl_ r = ~ l FAClIF!C . - _UN,oIV : - ~ - ~ L `l i S -T - ' ~ -y ~ ~Fit2~- • ur- ' , ~ ' i ~ C~eek ~ ~ ' 'I GRANITE~INT_~~ ~ Ay 1 A MICLE~' .tb Qt W . 'li o : 1 9 . r.~~ _ `'1 7 lf ~l _ fr ~ 'I: Y ~l~*~ A~~~ w 24