CUE-15-99
.
ti
SPOI!:ANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
RE Condzrional Use Permrt for a Home )
Industry, in the Urban Residential-3 5) FINDINGS OF FACT,
(UR 3 S) Zone ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Apphcant 1Vfichael and Stacey Howell ) AND bECISION
File No CUE-15-99 )
I S Y OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal Apphcaaon for a conditional use permit for a home indusiry in the Urban
Residential-3 5(UR 3 5) zone, to allow an automobde cleamng/detailing/aunor repair
business
Decision Approved, subject to revised conditions
The Hearmg Examiner has revtewed the conditional use permit apphcation and the
evidence of record, and hereby adopts the followiag fincimgs of fact and conclusions of law
II BACKGROUND/FINDINGS OF FACT
A. GeneralInformahon
Apphcant/Owner Mchael and Stacey Howell, 8124 F.ast Utah, Spokane, WA 99212
Site Address 8124 East Utah, Spokane, WA
Srte Location Generally located south of and adjacent to Utah Avenue, approximately 160
feet east of Dick Road, in the NW 1/4 of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, WA
Legal Description County Assessor's tax parcel no 45072 2111
Zoning Urban Residential-3 5(LTR 3 5) The srte is located uiside the Aquifer Sensitive Area
(ASA) Overlay zone and the Pubhc Transit Benefit Area designated by the County Zorung Code
Comprebensive Plan Urban category The subject property is also antlun the ASA, the
Spokane Crty Fringe Area, the Town of 1Vi1llwood Influence Area, the Pnonty Sewer Sernce
Area, and the Urban Impact Area desigaated by the Comprehensive Plan The site is withui the
County's 1 S-year sewer caprtal program area, designaxed in the 1996 Update to the
Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan
IUGA The srte is located inside the mtenm urban growth area boundanes designated by
the County pursuant to the State Growth Management
HE Fincimgs, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 1
,
«
f
Environmental Review A Deternunation of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the
Division of Planiung on July 28, 2000
Site Descnption The site is approxunately 13,875 square feet in sLZe and is accessed by
Utah Avenue The site contam an existing house and detached shop, detached carport, fencing
and Iandscaping Existing cyclone fencuig is found along the rear property luie and along a
portion of both the east and west property luies The existuig automobile detailing business on
the site takes place in the detached shop, with velucles currently stored in the front yard, the
dnveway for the residence, the dnveway for the shop and along the west side of the shop The
-business is the subject of a zonuig complalnt, since rt is bemg operated wrthout the proper zonuig
X approval
Area Road Network Vista Road, south of Euchd Avenue, and Buckeye Avenue, between
Park Road and Vista Road, are designated as Collector Artenals by the County Artenal Road
Plan Euchd Avenue and Park Road in the vicuuty aze designated as Muior Artenals Utah
Avenue adj acent to the mte, Dick Road and Fredenck Avenue are considered Loca1 Access
Roads Trent Avenue (State Route 290), located less than half a mile to the south, is a state
highway
Surronndmg Conditions The land unmediately surrouncung the site is designated in the
Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and zoned UR-3 5 A railroad nght of way wrth an
active set of tracks borders the north side of Utah Avenue across from the site West Valley High
School hes less about 350 feet east of the srte, at the southeast corner of the intersechon of Vista
Road and Utah Avenue The other surrounduig land uses are made up of single-fauaily
residences on sunilarly sized lots The Town of Millwood hes east of Vista Road in the azea,
between Trent Avenue to the south and the Spokane River to the north The City of Spokane hes
approxunately 1/3-nule northwest of the site
Project Description The apphcahon for a condihonal use pernut for a home industry, in
the UR-3 5 zone, requests approval for an existing automobile cleamng/detazling busmess,
wluch would be operated pnmanly out of the detached shop located in the westerly portton of
the site This includes the cleanung/washing of the intenor and extenor of cars, pauit touch-
ups, and the repair and replacement of defechve parts such as headltghts, pinstnping, molding,
etc See letter submitted on 5-30-00 by Mike or Stacey Howell The site plan of record, a
copy of which is attached to the staffreport, dlustrates an exishng residence, a detached
carport, and a detached shop
The site plan illustrates the size of the existing residence at approximately 1,200 square
feet, and the detached shop at approxunately 1,500 square feet in size The detached shop is
actually closer to the residence than indicated on the site plan, at a distance of 20 feet The
west side yard adjacent to the detached shop is larger than shown, being approxunately 20 feet
wnde The existulg fencing on the site is illustrated on the site plan The properiy is served by
on-site sewage disposal
HE Finduigs, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 2
w
B ProcedaralInfotmal3on
Apphcable Zonmg Regalations• Spokane County Zomng Code 14 616 240 (4), and Zomng
Code Chapter 14 404
Heanng Date and Location August 16, 2004, Spokane County Pubhc Works Butldmg,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room,1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices Mailed July 31, 2000
Published July 28, 2000
~ Site Visrt August 15, 2000
Hearmg Prncednre Pursuant to Resolution No 96-0171 and Resoluhon No 96-0294
Testimony
Tammy Jones 1Vlichael Howell
Division of Ciurent Planning 8124 East Utah Avenue
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99212
Spokane, WA 99260-4240
James Potts Ivo McKittnck
8203 East Frednck 8121 East Frednck
Spokane, WA 99212 Spokane, WA 99212
Items Nohced Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, County Zomng Code, County Code,
County Artenal Road Plan maps, 1996 Update to County Wastewater Management Plan, and
County Standards for Road and Sewer Construchon Counfiy Resolution Nos 99-0265 (revYSing
Standards for Road and Sewer Constrachon, 97-0874 (revising intenm regulations for Counfiy
IUGAs), 97-0321 (adophng intenm regulations for County NGAs), 96-0585 (adopting 1996
Update to CWMP), 96-0294 (Hearmg Exazmner Ruies of Procedure), 96-0293 (ESHB 1724
procedures), and 96-0171 (Hearmg Exanuner Ordinance)
III LAND USE ANALYSIS
FINDINGS OF FACT AN,D CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A Avvroval cntena
The Heanng Examin~r Ordinance authonzes the Hearmg Exa~ner to grant, deny or grant
with such conditions, modifications and restrichons as the Examiner finds necessary to make a
condztional use perncut apphcatton compatible vcnth the 5pokane County Generalized
Comprehensive Plan and apphcable development regulations See County Resolution No 96-
0171, Attachment "A", para.graphs 7(d) and secrion 11 Development regulations include
wrthout lnutation the County Zomng Code, the State Environmental Pohcy Act (SEPA) and the
County's Local Environmental Ordvaance (chapter 1110, Spokane County Code)
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 3
r
t
w
To be approved, the cond.ihonal use pernut must comply wrth the cntena set forth in the
Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) zone for a home industry, the development standards of the UR 3 5
zone, the general requirements for conditional uses contalned in Zomng Code 14 404100 et seq,
and other applicable development regulahons Zomng Code 14 404101 authonzes denial of a
conditional use permrt " where it cannot be shown that the requested use wnll be compatible wrth
other permitted uses in the zone mvolved and authonzes the Hearuig Examiner to unpose
conditions on development of a conditional use to ensure the pemut's compahbihty wrth other
permitted uses in the zone
Zomng Code 14 404102 (1) sets forth vanous condihons and restncttons that may be
unposed on issuance of a conditional use pernut This mcludes control of use, special or
t enhanced standards of development, control of noise, glare, and other envuonmental effects,
control of operating hours, lunrtations on duration or time of use, and "[aJny other reasonable
restnctions, conditions or safeguards that will uphold the spint and intent of the [Zoiung] Code
and the Comprehensive Plan and nutigate any adverse unpact upon the adjacent property by
reason of use, extension, constructon, or alteration allowed "
A comprehensive plan is considered as a general bluepnnt for land use regulation See
Citizens for Mount Vernon v City of Mount Yernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 873 (1997), and Cathcart v
Snohomi.rh County, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981) Where a comprehensive plan conflicts with
zomng regularions, the zoiung regulations will usually be construed to prevazl See Weyerhaeuser
v Pierce County, 124 Wn 2d 26, 43 (1994) Tlus is particularly the case wrth regard to the revlew
of condrtional use permrts See Han.sen v Chelan County, 81 Wn App 133, 138 (1996), and Pease
Hill v County of Spokane County, 62 Wn App 800, 808-809 (1991)
Counfiy Zomng Code 14100104 provides that the Zomng Code shall be interpreted to
carry out and unplement the purpose and intent of tha Comprehensive Plan, and the general plans
for physical development adopted by the Board of County Commisnoners Zomng Code
14100 106 mdicates that when the provimons of the Zomng Code conflict Rnth the
Comprehensive Plan, or other adopted plans and development regulations, the more restnctive
provisions shall govern to the extent legally pernaissible and the Zomng Code provisions wiU be
met as a minunum The Comprehensive Plan states that the decision guideluies set forth in the
Plan should be used as a reference source and guide for making land use decisions
Comprehensive Plan, p 2
B The condihonal use nemut for a home industrv, as conditioned., generallv conforms wrth
the ComDrehensive Plan, is Consistent with the purDOSe, intent and develoDment standards of the
Urban Residential-3 5(UR 3 5) zone, comphes wrth the snecial standards established bv the
UR-3 5 zone for the conditional use, is reasonablv compatible with other uses oermitted in the
UR-3 5 zone or m the Iacahon of the proposed use. reasonablv nutieates anv adverse unDacts on
adjouunQ Droperhes bv reason of use., extension., construction or altera.hon allowed wrth resoect
to the conditional use, and is consistent vnth the Countv ZorunLr Code and apvhcable
development reQUlations
The proposal is designated va the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The Urban
category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the opporhuufiy for a"citylike"
environment, includmg a vanety of land uses served by a hiigh level of pubhc facihhes and
servlces It is prunanly a residential category of suigle-fariuly, two-family, mulhfamily and
HE Finduigs, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 4
~
condomuuum bmlduigs, along mnth neighborhood commercial, hght industnal, pubhc and
recreational facluties The Urban category recommends a residential net densrty range of 1 to 17
dwellmg unrts per acre Comprehensive Plan, Urban category
The Urban category states that the more intensive uses such as hght industrlal and
neighborhood comtnercial should be located near the heavdy traveled streets, wrth the less
intensive uses such as residential isolated from the noise and traffc The Urban category does
not duectly address rtself to a"home industry" use The Urban category does allows for "home
occupations", wluch are similar to the "home profession" use which may be approved
administratively by the County Ihvision of Planning in the vanous zones recognized by the
County Zoning Code The Urban category recommends that before home occupations are
X approved in an existing residential area, it should be determined that they do not dlsrupt
residential amenittes conceaung sight, sound, smell and sunilar factors, create traffic which
exceed.s road design or which develops ftffic hazards within the neighborhood, or negaavely
unpact the intended uses anthin such category Urban category, Objechve 1 11 and Decision
Guideluie 1 17
Urban category uses should be served by a lugh level of pubhc services, includvag pubhc
sewer or intenm sewage d.isposal systems that protect water quahty Decimon Giudelines 1 12
and 13 3 A vanety and mix of residential uses and densities are recommended in such category
Decision Guideline 114 Residential areas are chscouraged in high noise areas Objective 15 d
and Decision Guideline 15 6
The Urban category recommends that new remdential development be buffered from
exlsting adjacent uses where adverse effects may develop, through use of spatial separation,
distance, screenuig, landscaping or other perfoimance standards Decision Guideluie 15 1
Structure height and the archrtectural character of novv development in relation to nearby
structwres in the neighborhood are to be considered before approvuig such development
Decision Guzdeline 15 8 Land use proposals should be consistent wrth adopted County and
service dxstnct uhhty plans, pohczes and regulations, and resolve adverse effects on pubhc
infirrastructure Decision Guideluie 1 61
The srte is also designated in the Town of Millwood Influence Area. Decision Guideluie
311 16 of the 1Vlillwood Influence Area pohcies of the Comprehensive Plan recommends that
pnor to approval of new developments wnthva such area decision makers should consider the
impact of new developments on existtng water quahty, traffc volumes and transportation
facihties Decision Guideluie 31 1 1 recommends that new development proposals in any
ulfluence area aaange for sernce by existing pubhc water, sewer, utihties and other capital
facilities of the apphcable town.
The srte is also demgnated in the Spokane City Fringe Area, which is the area withun
approxunately one (1) nule of the Spokane Crty lumts The Fnnge Area sechon sets forth,
wrthout limtataon, the followuig relevant pohcies
Objechve 301 a Provide present residents of the Spokane Fnnge Area a
qualtty of 1 fe by using the Comprehensive Plan as a pnmary tool for
guidrng development
HE Fmduigs, Conclusions and Decision CtJE-15-99 Page 5
N
Dect.sron Guideltne 3014 Urbarazation and development of vacant
urban areas and rehabilitanon of ccr.shng older areas should be permitted
when consT.rtent with City and County Plan polrcies relanng to uhlity
servtces, open space and alternatzve living environments
Decrston Guideline 30 16 New growth proposals within the Frrnge Area
should consider impacts upon the erivironment and exi.sting available
resources
Objective 3011 Properly drstribure the cost of producing and maintairang publtc services
and uhlrhes withtn the Fnnge Area
~
The proposal is zoned Urban Residential-3 5(LJR 3 5), a zone which unplements the
r
Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan Zomng Code 14 616100 states as follows
The purpose of the UR-3 S zone rs to tmplement the lower denstty range of
the Urban category of the Comprehenstve Plan The rntent of the zone rs
to promote areas of prcmanly single; family residentral use in an urbanized
neYghborhood semng, havrng a high level of public sernces Lots shall be
served by a public water system and shall require connecnon to a public
central sewer system when available Roadways shall be paved and
curbed and may have srdewalks
The UR-3 5 zone expressly allows a"home lndustry" as a condittonal use, provtded it
meets the standards set forth in Sechon 14 616 240 (4) of the Zomng Code and other apphcable
requsrements Sectxon 14 300100 of the County Zorung Code defines a"home industry' as
follows
An occupanon, profession, or craft, exxcluding an adult bookrtore or adult
entertainment establt,shment, tn assoctanon with a pnmary residence,
which rs of such tntensity or broad scope of operahon that publrc heartng
review, as a Conditional Use Permit, a necessary ?herefore, by
character and definttion, a home industry ts different than a home
profession or general commerctal, industrial and busrness uses
A"home profession" is pernutted as an accessory use in the UR 3 5 zone, provided that a
home profession pemut is obtalned Zomng Code 14 616 220 A home profession is a more
limited use than a home industry use, and must be camed on entirely wnthin a residence by the
occupants of such residence, be clearly incidental to the use of the residence as a dwelluig,
camaot change the residenrial character of the dwelling or nelghborhood, and be conducted
vinthout giving the outward appearance of a business See ZoYUng Code 14 300 100, definitlon of
"home profession"
The project is served by a reasonably lugh level of pubhc services, is located in an area
where pubhc facihties have already been estabhshed, and hes wrthin the intenm urban growth
area (IUGA) designated by the County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act While
the srte is served by on-srte sewage disposal, the site is located wrthin the 15-year sewer capital
prograzn azea adopted in the 1996 Update to the County Comprehensive Wastewater
Management Plan, which plan compnses an element of the Comprehensive Plan As such, the
proposed conditional use permit comphes wlth intenm development regulations adopted by the
HE Finduigs, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 6
r
q
County, that authonze un-sewered development anthin the IUGA if pubhc sewer is either
immediately available to the project or the site hes wnthin the 15-year sewer program area. See
County Resolution No 97-0874
The project file does not reflect contact vnth the City of Spokane or the Town of Millwood
regardzng the project However, the mte is located outside such junsdictions' sewer and water
service area. The site is located across from an active set of railroad tracks and has conveiuent
access to nearby artenals via Utah Avenue Such road is classified as a Loca1 Acces.s road, but
functions as somewhat of a collector road in the area due to the lack of crossing intersections
~ T1re automotive detailing, cleaning and mmor repair business conducted by the apphcant is
X performed in the detached shop, wluch shop has much less than tvvice the gross floor area of the
residence on the site T'his easily illustrates comphance wrth Zoning Code 14 616 240 (b) The
ExaBUner has added a condihon restncting busmess achvihes to the deta,ched shop This
includes the waslung of velucles
The record ind.icates that 2 persons are currently employed in the business, both of which are
family members At least one of the family members, and perhaps both, reside on the site This
easdy illustrates comphance vnth Zorung Code 14 616 240 (c), which allows an unlunrted
number of faznily members resldzng on srte, and up to 2 outside employees to be vavolved in the
busmess
Zonuig Code 14 616 240 (4)(c) authonzes a home industry an unlighted sign anth a
maaumum aarea of 4 square fee# on a face The apphcant does not currently display a siga for the
business and has not proposed a sign
The apphcant has not proposed any wuidow or outside displays, and there is no evidence of
any stock being stored or commodzty kept for sale on the site that ls unnecessary to the home
industry
Wiule several owners of property residuig wrthin a 400 foot radzus of the site objected to the
home industry, the only property owner who observed noise conung from the existing business
was the owner of properiy located directly south of the southeast porhon of the site Such person
indicated that the business was noisy at times, but did not descnbe noise as a major problem
See letter subnutted on 8-11-00 from Ivo McKittnck, and testimony of Ivo McKtttnck. The
Examiner agrees with Planning staff and the apphcant that noise unpacts will be minimal
provided the busmess is operated only wrthui the detached shop The apphcant is requn-ed to
comply vnth the maJnmum noise levels for residential property estabhshed in chapter 173-60
WAC There ls no evidence that such levels will be exceeded by the project
The apphcant indicated that a11 waste chenucals generated by the busmess are disposed of at
the Valley tra~nsfer station located on Sullivan Road The Examiner has added a condzhon to
ensure tlus A fan is used to ventilate the detached shop from one end to the other Cowaty Fire
Distnct 1 conchtions require the apphcant to meet the reqwrements of the Uniform Fu e Code, for
any pauiting done on site The Examiner has added a condition requuzng the apphcant to comply
wrth apphcable axr polluhon control reqwrements adopted by the Spokane County Air Pollution
Control
HE Fmdings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 7
Some property owners expressed concern over the traffc generated by the project along
Utah Avenue, which has a somewhat natrow paved width See testmmony of Ivo McKittnck
However, the record in&cates that the business typically handles only 3-4 vehicles per day,
although as many as 12 customer velucles have been left on srte at one time The business
acrivrty during the wurter ls low to non-existent See testimony of Mchael Howell The
Planning file (No F-352-99) estabhshed for a zoning complauit fileci by a neighboruig property
owner in 1999 indicated that the business was causing a taraffic hazazd by customer vehicles
backing out onto Utah Avenue
County Engineeruig dzd not express any concern over the traffiic impacts from the home
mdustry, but has reqwred that the apphcant subnut a parking and ftffic circulation plan for the
d home industry for review and approval by County Engmeermg The apphcant is also requzred to
approve a road unprovement distnct (RID) wauver, wluch includes the apphcant's property in
any future RID formed by the County for the unprovement of Utah Avenue The Exammer has
added a condirion of approval restricting access to the site to the existing approaches for the
residence and the detached shop, and prolubihng the apphcant from creating a traff'ic hazard
along Utah Avenue
The pnmary issue regarding approval of the home industry is malntenance of the residenhal
appearance and character of the site, considermg the number of customer velucles comuig to and
leav;ng the site, and the number of vehicles stored or pazked on site, or along neighboruig streets
near the site The Zonuig Code gives the Heanng Exammer broad discrehon over parktng, traffic
and storage requirements for the home industry The Exammer is of the opunon that to retain the
residential appearance and character of the site, no more than 4 customer velucles should be
pazked on or near the site at any one tune, and no more than 2 such vehicles should be visible
outside the shop or sight-obscuring fence on the srte
There is room in the shop dnveway for 2 customer velucles, room in the residence dnveway
for a customer velucle, and room for 1 or 2 velucles ulside the detached shop The west side yard
of the shop, which is 20 feet vvide, is currently used to store 2 personal vehicles whrch the
apphcant plans to detail at some point There may be room for another velucle in such location
The parlang of customer vehicles in the front yazd of the site, west of the detached shop, dettacts
from the residential appearance and character of the subject property and should not be allowed
The Exammer has added conditions of approval in these regards
The apphcant is reqlured to obtain a builduig permrt for the attached shop The Exammer
has required that such builduig pernart be apphed for withui 30 days of this decision
The reqturements of the State Environmental Pohcy Act and the County's Local
Environmental Ordinance have been met The Heanng Exammer concurs Rnth the
Deternunation of Nonsigmficance issued by the Division of Planning
With unposition of the above conditions on the home industry, the subject property will be
able to retaui its residenhal appearance and character, wnll be reasonably compahble vnth
adjoining land uses and other land uses m the UR 3 5 zone surrounding the srte, generally
conforms vnth the Urban category and other relevant pohcies of the Comprehensive Plan, and
complies wrth the Zorung Code and other apphcable development regularions
HE Fmdulgs, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 8
~
IV DECISION
Based on the above Finduigs of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the above apphcation for
a condihonal use permait for a home industry in the exishng UR 3 5 zone, for an automobde
cleamng/detailing/aunor repair busmess, is hereby approved, subject to the conchtions of
approval set forth below Any sigruficant chaages or add.itions to the conchtions of approval
recommezided by the pubhc agencie.s below are ttalictzed
Fazlure to comply with the conchtions of tlus approval may result in suspension or
~ revocahon of tlus approval by the Heanng ExaBUner This approval does not wazve the
apphcant's obhgahon to comply vnth all other reqiurements of other agencies with Junsdichon
over land development
SPOK;ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
1 All conchtions imposed by the Hearing Examinzer shall be binding on the "Apphcant" , which
term sh.all include the ownex(s) and developer (s) of the properiy, and their heus, assigns and
successors
2 The proposal shall comply with the spe.cial standards for a home indusbry va the Urban
Residential-3 5(UR 3 5) zone, specifically subsechon 14 616 240 (4) of the Spokane County
Zorung Code, the standards of the UR 3 5 zone, the Aquifer Sensihve Overlay zone, and other
apphcable sections of the County Zonuig Code, as amended
3 The apphcant shall develop the subje,ct properiy in conformance anth the site plan included
vvith the Staff Repork except as modified to comply Nnth conditcons of approval and development
regulations All aspects of the concept and proposal shall be binding on the development,
includuig proposed use Vanations, to be approved by the Division Duector/designee, pursuant
to Sec#ion 14 505 040, shall only be allowed to meet regulation standards and conchtions of
approval Any other modificatxon must be presented to the Aearmg Body for review and
approval
4 The Division of Planrung shall prepaYe and record with the Spokane County Audltor a Title
Notice, nohng that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special conchtions unposed
as a result of approval of a land use acfaon. This Title Nohce shall serve as pubhc nohce of the
conchtions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part,
by the Division of Planning The Title Notice sha11 generally provide as follows
"The parcel of property legally descnbed as [ ] is the subject of a land use achon by
a Spokane County Hearng Examiner on September 12, 2000, unposing a vanety of spe,cial
development condihons File No CUE-15-99 is avaslable for vnspechon and copymg vn the
Spokane County Ihvision of Planrung "
5 All busrness acnvities for the home industry shall be carrced on in the detached shop
illustrated on the site plan of record
HE Finduigs, Conclusions and Decimon CUE-15-99 Page 9
~
6 All errnronmentally hazardous matertals shall be contained and dtsposed of rn accordance
with appltcable local, state and federal regulanons
7 A maxtmurn of 4 customer vehicles macy be stored or parked on or near the site at any trme
No more than 2 customer vehicles may be stored or parked outszde on or near the site, at any
hme
8 Any customer vehicles parked or stored outsule on the site shall be parked or stored tn the
ext.snng dr7veway of the detached shop or single famtly restdence Customer vehicles parked or
stored rnside shall be stored or parked wtthzn the detached shop or completely screened from
vrew in the west srde yard of the detached shop by a 6; foot high sight-obscur7ng fence meehng
accessory use setback requirements
9 Vehtcles shall only access the site through the wa,snng resrdence or shop driveway, or
other road approach approved by County EngYneenng Such access shall not create a traffic
hazard along Utah Avenue
SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
1 The apphcant sha11 apply for a biulduig permit with the Spokane County Division of Builduig
and Code Enforcement, to legally recogruze the existmg detached shop An applicahon for such
permit shall be submitted by October 12, 2000
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a bnildwg pernut or nse of property as proposed
1 A parking plan and traffic cuculation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be m accordance
vnth standazd enguieenng practices Pavuig or surfacing as approved by the County Engmeer
will be reqLUred for any portion of the project wluch is to be occupied or traveled by velucles
2 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and draanage plan reqturements are found
in Spokane County Resolution No 99-0265 as amended and are apphcable to this proposal
3 An approach permrt shall be obtazned from the Spokane County Engineer Department
pnor to the construction of any new dnveway approaches Tius must be done pnor to the release
of a btulduig pernrut
4 Apphcant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Pubhc Number 6" wluch specifies
the followuig
"The owner(s) or successor(s) m interest agree that in considera.tion of Mutual Benefits
now or to be hereafter denved, c1o for themselves, theu heus, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
in interest hereby request and authonze Spokane County to include the above descnbed property
in a Road Improvement Distnct (RID) and to support the formahon of a Road Improvement
HE Finduigs, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 10
W
y ~
Distnct for unprovement of the road(s) descnbed below by requesting and authorizing Spokane
County to place theu- name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct
pursuant to RCW 36 88 050, or by requeshng and authonzing Spokane County to cast theu
ballot in favor of a RID bemg formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 88 0309
and/or by not filing a protest against the formahon of a RID being fonned under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW
If a RID is praposed for unprovement of the ruad(s) descnbed below, saud owner(s) and
successor(s)further agree (1) that the improvements or constniction contemplated wnthin the
proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be denved from the formation of the RID
by the praperty included there2n, together with the amount of any County panccipation, exceeds
~ the cost and expen.se of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property wrthin the proposed RID
is sufficiently developed, provided, themselves, their heus, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
shall retan the nght, as authonzed under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on the
property as a result of the unpmvements called for in conjunchon with the formation of a RID by
erther the petirion or resolution method undeT Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the Supenor
Court the decision of the Boazd of County Comuussioners confirnmng the final assessment roll,
provided further, it is recognized that actual assessmemts may vary from assessment estwaate so
long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fazr value unprovement(s)
add(s) to the property
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID ls created or any County
Road Improvement project is authonzed by Spokane County, the unprovements required shaU be
at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property anthm the RID or senred by the unprovements
Rnthout any monetary participation by Spokane County
The RID waiver containecl in ttus agreement shaU expue after ten (10) years from the date
of execulxon below This provision ls apphcable to Utah Avenue from wluch the subject parcel
takes access „
SPOKANE COUNTY DIYISION OF UTILTrIES
1 Any water sezvice for this project shaU be provided in accordance vnth the Coordvaated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
2 Stormwater Utihty Any additional runoff generated from unpervious surfaces shall dratn
to grassed percolarion area swales
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1 All apphcable mr polluhon control regulahons must be met
SPOK;ANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO 1
1 If the applicant intends to paunt cars, the apphcant shaU meet the requirements of the
Uniform Fue Code
HE Fuiduigs, Conclusions and Decision CLTE-15-99 Page 11
.
~ M
DATED this 12th day of September, 2000
SPOX:ANE COUNTY HEARING E R
~
'4tl
1VS~ aeDempsey, 1WS A 35
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pmsuant to Spokane County Resolution No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng Examuner
on an apphcation for a condihonal use pernut is final and conclusive unless vrntlun twenty-one (21)
calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decmon, a party wrth standing files a land use
petihon in supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW, the
date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is mauled
This Decision was mazled by Certified Mail to the Apphcant on September 12, 2000 The
date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is therefore September 15, 2000, countjng to
the next business day when the last day for mailing falls on a weekend of hohday THE LAST
DAY FOR APPEAL OF TffiS DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND USE
PETTTION IS OCTOBER 6. 2000
The complete record in this matter, includuig tlus decision, is on file dunng the appeal penod
vnth the Office of the Hearmg Examiner, Third Floor, Pubhc Works Builduig, 1026 West
Broa.dway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490 The file may be uispected
Monday-Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8 30 a.m and 5 00 p m
Copies of the documents in the record vcnll be made available at the cost set by Spokane County
HE Finduigs, Conclusions and Decision CUE-15-99 Page 12
l'raject 5tatus Active ENGINEER'S RF.''";riE•'1V SHEET
:1s Built Plans Received f.'onditional Use File CtJE-0015-99 -99
Ruad Plans Approved Campanion Pilcs:
Nr~~ E:oad 5trdarci; 5-1:+-95 ~1~ Itzr
~ flelatzd Filcs:
Hearing: 08/16/2000 10:30 IIuilding Dept:
Technical Rcview:
Yreliminary Review: U I' 13,121001) Type: Scheduled I=or Large Lot _ Bldg. Square Feet
Date Received: No. LoLs: No. Acres:
Project Name HOME INDLISTRY AUTO DEIAILING
Site Address E. D1CK, N. FREDLItICK, S. iJTAl1, W. VISTA,
Applicant (L3ngc-Toti\ nship-tiection: 44- 2> - I1; PAKCEL(S): (tirst'_0)
Ivlichacl & Stacev Nowell Conditions Mailed: 45072.2111
Fluod Zone Nq
8124 E. Utah Water Source Public
SPOKANE, WA 99212-
Scwer Source
Phone Schoul Dist
(509) 892-9671 Firc Dist I
Phone Dist
Orvner
Nfichael & Stacev Howcil
8124 E. Utah
SPOKANL-. WA 992 ]
Phane
(,;0y) 892-967 I
13uilding Ph: 477-3675 / Ylanning Ph: 477-2205 Conlact: TA'~ttilY JONLS
Date Submitted Description Initials
Eng Need Technically Complete Eng Need f-{arvard Rd Mitigation
6ng Need Drainage Plans Eng Nced 'I'raffic Analysis Eng Need Other
Eng Agree Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Fees Completed
('opy to Accounting
Eng Agrce Yriority Fees Received 12/10/1999 Eng Prelim Plat Fees Completed
6 c.,umpletea - or ?~eetl; to he ;i'ne~l
, Notice tu Nublir Notice to Public 1 ~ 4
Design Deviation Qatcs (In-0ut)
1' l I l / I I
S'ona quanties tor
~ drainage item calculated
Hearing Date Decision App Den Cond Appld BCC
Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appld Cuurt
Appealed to Court Decision App Den Cund Appld
Stamped Mylars to Secretary (Sandy)
Stamped 208 l.ot Plans to Secretary (Sandy)
ENGINEE"R'S~KEVIEW SHEE'I'
Project Slatus Activc
As Built Plans Received Conditional Use File C VE-0015-99 -99
Road Plans Approved (_'unlpanion f-ile,:
New Road Standards 5-15-95 My1ar
ltelated File;
tiearing: BuilJing Drp?:
Technical Review:
Preliminary Review: 0 1,1 _3 1'2000 Typc: Snceduled fur Largc: Lut Bldg. Square Feet
Date Received: No. Lats: No. Acres:
Project Name HQME INDUSTRY AUTO DETAII..ING
Site Address E D1CK, N. FRFUERIC'K, S. UTA}i, W. VISTA,
Range-Toxvnship-Section: -l=l - 25 - 07 PARCEL(S): (first 20)
Applicant Conditions Mailed: 45072.2111
titll'}1ael & Staccy f lowell Flooc! ?_one No
Water Source Puhlic
8] 24 E. Utah Sewer Source
SPOKANE, WA 99212- School Dist
Phone Fire Dist 1
(509) 892-9671
Phone Dist
Owner
Michael & Stace,, Fio%%ell
5124 E. Utah
SPOKANE, WA 9921
Phone
(509) 892-9671
[3uilding Pti- 477-3075 Planning Fh: =377-2205 Contact: 'f:1R1.N11' 1U\LS
Date Submitte Description Initials
Eng Need Technically Complete Eng Need Harvard Rd Mitigation
Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Traffic Analysis [:ng Nced uther
Eng Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Pees Completed
Eng Priority Fees Reeeived ~~~~p~' t~~ :~rcounun~
Notice to Publir ' Nonce to Pubiic # ! ± 4 b C'ompleted - or Needs to be signeil
( )esign Ueviation Dates ([n-Out)
,
7~nU yuanUes ior
drama2e item cairulateci
!-learing Date Decision App Den Cond Appld B('c '
Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appld Court
Appealed to ('uurt Decision App Uen (:'unil Appld
Stamped htylars to Secretary (Sandy )
/ Stampcd 208 Lot Plan: tu Secrctary (Sandy)
R .
. I
V 1
. - . „
~ . _
STAF.F REPORTTOTHE HEARING EXAMINER
FILE#: CUE-15-99 RECEIVED
III DIVISION OF PLANNING AUG 0 9 2000
SPoKAi-,.T Couxry SMKME couNTY ENG,r,
HEARING DATE: AugUSt 16, 2000 @ 9:00 a.m. FILE CUE-15-99
'OROJECT PLANNER: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
°ROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry to allow an auto
letailing business in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone pursuant to Section
14.616.240(4) of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
Proiect Data
Project Location: ~ The subject property is generally located south of and
adjacent to Utah Avenue and approximately 160 feet
east of Dick Road in the NW '/4 of Section 7,
Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane Coun'Ly.
Washington.
Parcel Number(s): 45072.2111
OwnerlApplicant: Michael Howell
8124 E. Utah
Spokane, WA 9921 2
(509) 892-96 i 1
Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~ Urban (U)
Zoning: Urban Residentia1-3.5 (UP,-;;.5)
Existing Land Use: Single family res;cential
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: _
• North: Zoning to the north of the site is Urban ResidentiG(-
3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in 1956 (ZE-
207-56). Land use to the north of the site consists o`
a railroad right of way and single family residentiai
uses.
• South: Zoning to the south of the site is Urban Residential-
3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously
classified as Agricultural Suburban (AS) in 1956 (ZE-
207-56). Land use to the south of the site consists
single family residences on similarly sized lo:s
• East: Zoning to the east ot the site is Urban Residr_~~ ~tr~±- ~
(UR-3.5) established in 1991, previously c(assi~
Agricultura( Suburban (AS) in 1956 (ZE-207-56
Land use to the east of the site consists of sing'--
family residences on similarly sized lots.
• West: Zoning to the west of the site is Urban Residenua,-;,~ ~
(UR-3.5) established in 1991, previous(y c(assified ~t
Agricuftural Suburban (AS) in 1956 (ZE-207-56).
Land use to the west of the site consists ef sinqle
CUE-15-99
Staff Report - August
1 c `
~
. •
~ ~ . r
. family residences on similarly sized lots:
Known Land Use Proposals and Recent land use actions include CUE-1-99; a
Recent Project Approvals in the Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry to allow a
Area of this Project: frame shop in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-
3.5) zone for property located southwest of the
subject site at the intersection of Rutter Avenue and
Park Road, and approved by the Hearing Examiner
on June 24, 1999.
Land Division Status: The subject property is a tax parcel of record. A
Certificate of Exemption to recognize the parcel as a
legal building lot will be required prior to the issuance
of future building permits.
Water Purveyor: Irvin Water District
Sewage Disposal: The proposal is served by an on-site septic system.
Fire District Spokane County Fire Protection District #1 provides
fire protection to the site.
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The site is located approximately 600 feet west of
Vista Road, and Vista Road is designated as a
Collector Arterial by the Spokane County Arterial
Road Plan.
Neighborhood Association: None identified
• This proposal is located inside of the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA).
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA).
• This proposal is located inside the 15-year Sewer Service Area.
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject property is located within the
Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone.
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas: None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps.
Floodplain: Not applicable
Geologically Haiardous Areas: None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps.
Wetlands: None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps.
SEPA
A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on July 28, 2000, with a comment period
ending on August 14, 2000.
Noticinq
Published: The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman Review on
July 28, 2000.
Mailing Deadline: The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayers on land within 400 feet of
the proposal was August 1, 2000.
1724 Comaliance Dates
Application Accepted (Counter Complete): December 10, 1999
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: June 16, 2000
CUE-15-99
Staff Report - August 16, 2000 Hearing
2 of 6
l
~
, r
~ Date Notice of Decision is Due: September 14, 2000 ~
Reviewinq Aqencies I
8 agencies were notified on December 17, 1999, and July 20, 2000. Agency comments were due on
January 13, 2000, and August 3, 2000.
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date
Received Received Received Received
Spokane Count,v Division Yes 7/28/00 Spokane County Fire Y~ s 1. ~ ~%00
of EngineerinG,
Transportation
Spokane County Divisicn N o IN,:.
of Engineering,
Development Services ~
Spokane County Division Yes 7124100 Spokane Count;;
of Utilities Pollution Control
Authority
Spokane County Division Yes 8/1/00 Spokane Regionai Nu
of Utilities, Water Health District
Resources ,
Aqency Comments:
Comments received are general in nature and in the form of recommended conditions of approval. Fire
District No. 1 has stated that if any cars are painted on site, the applicant shall meet the requirements of thc
Uniform Fire Code.
Responses from the Public:
Comments have been received from surrounding property opposed to the proposed Home Industry base::
on traffic and noise associated with the existing use. Comments letters from surrounding property owners
also stated that applicant may be doing auto body work in addition to the proposed auto detailing busines--.
Descriqtion of the Site:
The site is approximately 13, 875 square feet in size and is accessed by Utah Avenue. The site contains an
existing house and detached shop, detached carport, fencing and landscaping. The applicant has stated
that the existing auto detailing business takes place in the detached shop. Surrounding uses include single
family residences on similarly sized lots and a railroad right of way directly to the north of the site.
Backqround:
The applicant was notified on October 13, 1999, by the Division of Building and Planning that the existing
business was a zoning violation (file # F-352-99) and was advised to apply for a Conditional Use Permit 1r,
Home Industry. The application for the proposal was submitted on December 10, 1999, and determined c
be technically complete on June 13, 2000. The Notice of Application was circulated on June 13, 2000, wi,,
a comment period ending on June 24, 2000. The applicant has stated that the proposed Home Indust-,,
allow an auto detailing business will consist of the cleaning of both the interior and exterior of cars, pair :
touch ups, and the repair and replacement of defective parts (headlights, pinstriping, molding, etc.). The
is to take place in an existing detached shop, located on the west end of the lot, which is approximately 15Gu
square feet in size. Building permit records for the subject property do not include a permit for the existing
detached shop. If the proposed Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry is approved, the applicant will
be required to apply for a building permit for the existing shop.
Site Plan:
The site plan submitted by the applicant illustrates an existing residence, a detached carport, and
detached shop. The applicant has stated that the proposed Home Industry will take place within
detached shop. The site plan illustrates that the size of the existing residence is approximately 120`1
`e-et and til-,at ex:sting shap is zpproximate!y 1500 sauare feet in size. The subject croper~ / has
Staff Report - August 16, ZCi,O Hearing
3of6
I
Ik
. •
cyclone fencing along the rear property line and along a portion of both the east and west property lines. The
site plan illustrates that the existing shop and parking area is accessed from Utah Avenue.
Staff Anaivsis:
I
Comprehensive Plan:
The site is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is intended to
provide the opportunity for the development of a°citylike" environment which includes various land uses,
intensive residential development, and public facilities and services. The Urban category states that the
more intensive uses such as light industrial and neighborhood commercial should be located near the
heavily traveled streets, with the less intensive uses such as residential isolated from the noise and traffic.
The Urban category indicates that buffering, screening, or other performance standards may be required to
make potentially conflicting land uses compatible. Objective 1.1.i states that " Home occupations may be
allowed provided they are non-disruptive of neighborhood amenities" and is followed by Decision Guideline
1.1.7 which lists criteria to be considered prior to the approval of a home occupation. These criteria state
that prior to the approval of a home occupation, it should be determined that it will not result in the disruption
of residential amenities concerning sight, sound or smell, create traffic hazards or negatively affect intended
uses within the Urban category. The proposed Home Industry can be generally consistent with these
criteria if the proposed auto detailing business is performed within the detached shop in order to minimize
noise impacts to the adjacent properties and if the number of customers visiting the site is kept to a
minimum. Decision Guidelines 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 require the use of buffering to mitigate the impacts between
proposed and existing uses. The proposed Home Industry is limited to the west end of the subject property
in the area of the detached shop. If the proposed business can be confined within the detached shop, then
additional buffering for the home to the west of site may not be necessary. The Urban category does not
specifically recognize a Home Industry, however, a Home Industry is similar to a home occupation and is an
allowed use in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone provided the applicant applies for and receives a
Conditional Use Permit.
The site is also located within the Spokane City Fringe Area designated by the Comprehensive Plan, which
is the unincorporated areas of the County that lies within one (1) mile of the Spokane City limits. The intent
of the Spokane City Fringe Area section is to provide guidelines for development in the "Fringe Area" and
the purpose is to provide a means to determine whether or not a proposal should be approved, conditioned
or denied. Objective 30.1.a is to provide residents of the Spokane Fringe Area a quality of life by using the
Comprehensive Plan as a primary tool for guiding development. As stated above, the proposed Conditional
Use Permit for a Home Industry is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the
Urban category.
As proposed, the application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry is consistent with the Goals,
Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning Analysis:
The proposal is located in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone and the purpose of the Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone is to implement the lower density range of the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The intent of this zone is to promote areas of primarily single-family residential use in
an urbanized neighborhood setting, having a high level of public services. A Home Industry is an allowed
use in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone provided the applicant applies for and is granted a
Conditional Use Permit and demonstrates compliance with the Conditional Use Permit criteria of the
Spokane County Zoning Code. Sections 14.404.101 and 14.616.240(4) of the Spokane County Zoning
Code identify the criteria governing the approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry.
Section 14.404.101 of the Zoning Code states that before a Conditional Use Permit is approved, the Hearing
Examiner shall find that 1). Adequate conditions and restrictions are attached to the development of the
property to ensure that the proposed use will be compatible with uses permitted outright in this location; and
2). The special standards as outlined in the Zoning Code for the underlying zone shall be met.
CUE-15-99
Staff Report - August 16, 2000 Hearing
4of6
f
i - :
Review of the proposal's compliance with the specific development criteria for a Home Industry as
identified in Section 14.616.240(4) is as follows:
' Section 14.616.240(4)(a): The property sha(I retain its residential appearance and character;
Response: The subject property is a residential lot that is landscaped and maintained. The proposed use
is to occur in an existing detached shop located to be located near the west property line of the site. The
applicant has not proposed any outside storage areas and the applicant has stated that the business
averages one to three customers per week who visit the site. Staff visited the site on August 1, 2000, and
counted six cars parked on or near the driveway to the detached shop, but was unable to determine if the
cars were related to the business use or private vehicles owned by the applicant.
' Section 14.616.240(4)(b): The use shall be carried on in a primary residence or may be ailowed in
accessory, detached structures which are not, in total, larger than finro (2) times the gross floor area of the
primary residence;
Response: The applicant has stated that the proposed Home Industry will be carried out in an existing
detached shop that is approximately 1500 square feet in size. The applicant approximates that the gross
floor area of the primary residence is 1200 square feet. The existing detached shop, as illustrated on the
site plan, is not larger than two (2) times the gross floor area of the primary residence.
• Section 14.616.240(4)(c): Only members of the family residing on the premises, and no more than two
(2) employees outside of the family, may be engaged in the home industry.
Response: The applicant has stated that only members of the family residing on the premises and no more
than Nvo (2) outside employees will be engaged in the proposed Home Industry.
• Section 14.616.240(4)(d): One (1) sian identifying the Home Industry shall be urlighted ar,cl r-:= L-c
2Itacf1:'d Gr GetaCh°d Sh,-.11 te v fil :,xIf1lL1r1 Gi iOuf (4) SqUp("F• iCet C'i a icC~.
Response: i nere are no propc~sd si.rs i!iustra`~~i on ?i,i~ ~it:. p~~,n ~r ~:.~is~ing ~n
' Section 14,696.240(4)(e): Window ar outside displays may be allowed as approved by tne Hearing Bcdy.
!iG( ..i~^~~,`✓S
prc; ~ ,1*1_--,
Response: There are no ':V C'.
Tncre sr~dii r~~_ ~ f,
• Section 94. 616.240(4) (0: ~
which is not necessary to the occupation,
Response: The applicant has not proposec, .
.
necessary to the proposed Home Industry
'SeCfion 14.616.240(4)(g): All material or mccr-.ainica! equipment sh~il ce .scc in s~.ch a rra~n~:- ~.s in compliance with WAC-173-60 regarding noise
Response: No physical measurement of sound ieveis hUvt be:n taKe-n indicocc ncise i=-vcis do or
not exceed the 55 dBA limitation as required by WAC 173-60 for residential properties. The business shot.:
be primarily confined to the interior of the existina detached shop in order to minimize arny sound impact tr
adjacent propertie,_~
'Section 14,696.240(4)(h)F2rkJng. H
Body
Response: Section 14.404.102 alfows the Hearing Examiner to attacn additioral res;r,ctions Gnd cerditiors
to make ihe proposed Home Industry compatible with adjoining land uses.
CUE-15-99
Staff Report - August 16, 2000 Hearing
5 of 6
~
~ ' ~
' Section 14.616.240(4)(i): Ail storage areas shall be enclosed or completely screened from view by a
maximum six foot-high sight obscuring fence meeting accessory use setback requirements.
Response: There are no proposed outside storage areas illustrated on the site plan.
Staff SummarvAs proposed, the Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry generally meets the minimum criteria as listed
in Section 14.616.240(4) (a-i) of the Spokane County Zoning Code, is generally consistent with the Urban
category of the Comprehensive Plan and may be compatible with adjacent land uses, provided that the
proposed auto detailing business will be primarily carried on within the existing detached shop.
Attachments:
A. Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Site Plan
• Zoning Map
• Comprehensive Plan Map
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Agency and Public Comments
CUE-15-99
Staff Report - August 16, 2000 Hearing
6of6
I
. .
~ .
ATTACHMENT A
MaPs
VICINITY MAP
SITE PLAN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
ZONING MAP
~
~
} CUE-1 5-99 ,
Existing Zoning
UR 3.5 R'3 U-7 URT~`' R 3 5
• • R-3.5 ~ UR
K1R-3.5 UR-3. U ~ -
UR' UR-3 -3.
lJ R 3.
WA
It;~I;;,,~,, . ~
,
u ~
3'
61 -3, 5
_ 3•
UR-31
i~
. • , . • U
1
-~.5 -
~
-3 3 R . -3. 111 j 1
3 . .
~
~
.
3 R 3 \ +
U-3.5
UR
' UR-3.5 ' - -
~ F+~ A
~
"7
R 7 1 UR~3. ~
1 \ \
~ UR-3.5 U~i 3•
FT_ NN N'
U~.3. 3. ~ .3V 1 \7 \ ~ N,
U - ~UR 3.
B_
~ l~R 5 OR13. \ \
. .
B-3 :
.5 B'
R•3:5 UR-7
- ~ ~ 3
1 ' U -2 ~Z {UR 315111 ( I B-3
~ 6 3 V B ' 3 I ~ ~R-3.1 - i i i-
~ 3. 5 R- . . . 5 B- 3
• ' I ; R-
~ -B-
3
.2 -2 ~ UR ~2 ~3 2 -3
-2 -2•. ~ - i U r1, :j
Scale : 1 inch - 875 ft 081011 00 Ekisting lonin ;
r
' CUE-15-99 f
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
~n i -
I
~ .Y . . ~I
~ IPTT
~ I I II i ► I
T-I
•7
$
p ''',n;"'~~~~~~~~1 ' • - _
__I
' •
'f~lllllllllllllll~
IZZ
cl d
. ~ ~ ~ __.,~•y -
, , . I~~ • \ '
- I ~ L_1~1~L1~1.~ n
B
- ~Fq=
L
i ~
IC ~ I r
lt~~~ ~ I I I ~ ~
d ~
/ ~ i ~ ll I I 1 n ti
I u~:
n `Sc ~
q _
1- i z
_L TI
- 13
~ ~ -
~ pl::~ 1:1-10M r--r-rQZn
~
Scale :1 inch - 1250 ft 08/01/00 Comprehensive land Use Plan
Subject Property within IUGA. n-A A---- Subject Property within UTA.
L J~ l~ l Subject Property within PSSA. l--~-~~ Subject Property within ASA.
32 ~
31- d \
~ ` .
o ~
~ 10 ~rc
~
ij~
1itlooi 0. o~ S R;r~~"+`v~~~~~~~~~~~ii{iii~~?.~~~~~.,_ i~~• 1~~~~i"~,~i~iii~~~~~~~ ~~~it~'~~`~r~n~n~nr~~~ ri~~+ ~ ~n
~
~
~
~
~
~
,
S r`~. 1
. ~ ,
1 ~1~•.sm 4
~ v
Mi~ss~n ~ 1 ~
' Mai'we1\ y N
~ Sinto _ ~
' - 5int ~ -
~
~
I ~
Te /}C, k-,5
~i
~
. , n
Le).~
~ a f~ • ~ - r~►SC~'` ~ I ~.y ~ z;
:c,
~ ~ c7
deNce-
~
ro
~ 0 0
. > ~ ~
^PP),~se~
1,~_,~..~.i~„<<„i~~~~~,~,~~ ~i t<<<„ i r~'ti'~..~•i
. ,
in~ i~!'r'! r~'•,i'
n
urnfE
S ir~ ~ ~k35o'•~ ~
J
~
~~ase~ ~'o h~:~~.~{zo~1 tCL)
O
I
ATTAGHNIEN7 B
CC?NDfTI{)NS C}F APf'ROVAL
r ^
7
~ RECOMMENDED CONDITI4NS OF
1 1 APPROVAL FOR CUE-15-99
M
~ ~ ~ DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOK~ COU~T
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, specifically
Section 14.616.240(4) and all other applicable chapters of the Spokane County Zoning
Code, as amended.
3. The applicant shall develop subject property in strict conformance with the site plan
presented to the Hearing Examiner on April 12, 2000. All aspects of the concept and
proposal shall be binding on the development, including proposed use. Variations, to be
approved by the Director of the Division of Planning/designee, shall only be allowed tr"
meet regulation standards and conditions of approval. Any other modific^fi!on m! ict E-e
crcSnrtp-4 4n the Hle'3f!ilr; EY?,r,1;rAr fnr ~e-vievf ~rd ~~^r^~,/^!
D;ViSioi i vi f'iaf il ili ig l~UUiior
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Titl;:
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal an~;
only be released, in full or in p?rt, by thP Division o` Pl~rining. The Title Nctice s~n,-:1li
gcneral!y prov:de Us follows:
The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use
action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on August 16, 2000, imposing a
variety of special development conditions. File No. CUE-15-99 is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planninq.
5. The applicant is required to apply for a building permit wi:-
~ J . i . . .
of Building and Code Enforcement to legally recognize the existing detached shc
i
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
~
~
AUG-03-00 09 01AM FROM-SCAPCA 50947T6828 T-654 P 04/04 F-465
~
SPOKANE COUNTY
AR PouunoN
is~ Occ A N. CONTROL AUfHOR1TY
WEST 1107 COLLEGE. SUITE 403 • SPOKANE WA 99201 •(509) 477-4727 Fas (509) 477-66n
Date August 3, 2000
To TammM Jones, Assoeiate Pianner
Spokane County Dnnsion of Planninq
1026 W Broadway Avenue
SQokane. WA 99260 0220
Frorn Ron Edgar, Chief of Techrncal Services
RE SCAPCA REt1U1REMENTS FOR
Fite No CUE-15-99
Proponent / Project Name Condiponal use permit - home Indmilry fior auto detailinq/8124 E Utah
❑ Comments on Determmabon of Nonsignificance Issued on Auigust 16t 2000 @ 9 00 a m
The follovnng is a Iist of concernslissues that may need to be addressed for this project as determined from
information received by this office The list is provided as a bnef summary of general requirements and does not
relieve the proponent from meebng all ixai state andior federal regulatrons For addMonai informafion or
cia~'icatron, contact SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727 Copies of SCAPCA regulabons are avaiiable far purchase in
our office ar can be viewed and dcwnioaded from httoJ%ww scanca orq
Construetion related requirements
• Dust emissions dunng demolifion construchon and excavation projects must be controtled This may require
the use of water sprays, tarps, spnnklers or suspension of act,vjty dunng certain weather condittons
• Measures must be tafcen to avoid the deposaion of dirt and mc,d from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces
If tracking or spills cccur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately co clean these surfaces
• Debns generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning
• SCAPCA sorongly recommends that ail traveled surfaces (i e ingress, egress, parking areas access roads,
etc ) be paved and kept clean to mmimize dust emissions
• If objeetionable odors result from this project, efFectwe conuol appatatus and measums must be taken to
reduce odors to a mmimum
Additional reQwrements
• A Notice of Construction and Applicatron for Approval is required fio be submrtbed and approved by SCAPCA
prior to the construetion instaliatron or estabitshment of an air pollution source This includes emergency
generators rated at 500 hp (375 kW) ot higher, natural gas hea4ng equipmene uni4s rated at 4 MAIIBTU/hr or
higher (mput) and heatmg equipment unRs fired wdh other fuels (e g diesei) rated at 9 MMBTU[hr (input) or
higher Contact SCAPCA fcr a Nouce of Construc#ton appiicatton
• A Notice of Intent must be submitted to SCAPCA pnor to any demoitbon project or asbestos project An
asbestos sunrey must be done by an AHERA accredited building inspector prior to the demolftion or
renovation of buildings to determme if asbestos-contaming matenal is present at the sne Contact SCAPCA
for a Novice of intent applirat,on
'1101fWft0-§VMNERAL COMMENTS FORM doc
~
AUG-03-00 09 OIAM FR0M-SCAPCA 50947T6928 T-654 P 03/04 F-465 +
~0~ ~V~
A!R
POIlUTION
AOCLEAR;P4
z3; Pc:o K A Ne. CONTROL AUTHORITY
WEST 1701 COLLEGE SUITE 403 • SPOKANE WA 99209 •(So9) 4774727 Fax (S09) 4774028 '
Date An ust 2. 2000
To Tammy Jones. Associate Planner
Spokane County Diviston of Planntnq
1026 W BroadwaM Avenue
SQokane. WA 99260
From Ron Edgar, Chief of Technrcal Servrces
RE SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR
File No CUW-16-99
Proponent / Prolect Name Conditional use Qernnit for an Agflcultural Processinq
o Comments on Hearing Exammer Public Hearing on August 23, 2000 a 9 00 a m
The foilomnng is a list of concemsrssues that may need to be addressed for this project as determined from
informauon received by this office The list is provided as a bnef summary cf generai ret{ulrements and does noi
reiieve the proponent from meedng atl local state, and/or federal regulatrons For additonal mformafion or
cianficatron ccntact SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727 Copies of SCAPCA regulations are avaiiable for purchase rn
our office or can be viewed and downloaded from hrtoJAwwscacca orq
Construction nelated requirements
• Dust emissions dunng demoiition, construction snd excavafion projects must be contro(led This may require
the use of water sprays, tarps sprmkters, or suspensron of activity dunng certam weather condrhons
• Measures must be taken to avad the deposition of dirt and mud fiom unpaved surFaces onto paved surfaces
If tracking or spiils occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfac;es
• Debris generated as a resuit of this project must be disposed af by means other than bum,ng
• SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i e ingress egress, parkrng areas, access roads
etc ) be paved and kept clean to minimrze dust emissions
• If objecfionable odors resuit from this project effecbve control apparatus and measures must be taken to
reduce odors to a mintmum
Addklonal requirements
• A Notice of Constnrc4on and Applicatron for Approvai is required to be submitted and approved by SCAPCA
pnor to the consVucbon mstallation or establishment of an air pollution source This rnc(udes emergency
generators rated at 500 hp (375 kW) or higher, natural gas heatmg equipment units rated at 4 MMBTU/hr or
higher (input), and heafing equipment units fired uvith other fuels (e g dieset) rated at 1 MMBTUlhr (mput) or
higher Contact SCAPCA for a Not,ce of Construcbon applicat,on
• A Natice of Incent must be submitted to SCAPCA pnor to any demaliton project or asbestos project An
asbestos survey must be done by an AHERA accredited buildmg mspector pnor fio the demoiRlon or
renovatfon of buildmgs to determine if asbestos-contairnng materiai is present at the site Contact SCAPCA
for s NoUce of Intent application
: ~n,►rea ona~eos►eoQipo,
~ Wlary MFORMStGENERAI.. COMMENTS FORM dx 6
~
C ~
,
OFF(CE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
~ 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
.Ot3tt~► -
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITlONAL USE PERMIT
TO Spokane County Planning Depart ~ nt FROM Division of Engineenng & Roads ~_c Cr C&C-1
DATE July 28, 2000 PROJECT HOME 1NDUSTRY AUTO DETAILING
r1LE # CUE-0015-99/
Heanng 08/16/2000 @ 10 30
Review Date 01 /13/2000
Sponsorlapplicant MlCHAEL & STACEY HOWELL
Section Township Range 07-25-44
Planner TAMMY JONES
The Spokane County Engineenng Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
follawrng "Conditions ofi Approval" are submrtted to the Spokane Cauniy Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusrons and Order/Decislon" shou(d the request be approved
Prior to release of a buiiding permit or use of property as proposed
1 A parking plan and traffic circulatlon plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer The design location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practlces Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
2 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commrssioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposaf
3 The appltcant should be advised that an approach permit must be obtatned from the Spokane
County Engineer Department pnor to the construction of any new driveway approaches Thls
must be done prior to the release of a building permit
~ Applicant sha11 sign 'Spokane County Notice to the Public Numoer 6" tivhicn speciies 'the
fallowrng
.."1•.^.~~a.~r`~J.._ ~
7__ _rJf J~ ..S
! I ~ i
Dage 2
08/16/2000 01/13/2000
CUE-0015-99
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual 6enefits now or to
be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authonze Spokane County to include the above descnbed property
in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the forma4on of a Road improvemenf
Distnct for improvement of the road(s) descnbed below by requesbng and authonzing Spokane
County to place their name(s) on a petrtion for the formation of a Road Improvement Distrrct
pursuant to RCW 36 88 050, or by requesting and authonzing Spokane County to cast their
bailot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 88 030,
and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternat►ve
resolution method provrded for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) descnbed below, said owner(s) and
successor(s)further agree (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RI D are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derrved from the formafion of the RI D
by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participatlon, exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RI D and (3) that the property wrthin the proposed RI D
is sufficiently developed, provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
shall retain the right, as authonzed under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on
the praperty as a result of the improvements called for in conjunctton with the formation oi a Rl D
by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appea! to the
Supenor Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final
assessment roll, provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equa( to the increased true and fair
value improvement(s) add(s) to the property
(t is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road
Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at
the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
without any monetary participation by Spokane County
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of
executron below This provision is applicable to Utah Avenue from which the subject parcel
takes access
END
r ~
t
~
To Tammy Jones (,Current Planning)
CC
From Jim Red (Ublibes)
Date Monday July 24 2000
Subject GUE-0015-99 Stage Heanng Examiner Phase
Auto Detailing Shop
SS09A This proposal has no impact on sewer facilitres and therefore there are no recommendations
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordmated Water
System Pian for Spokane County, as amended
,
~ -
t ~
iUi E flll O R A N D lJ NI
DATE August 3, 2000
TO Tammy Jones, Divisi of Planrung
~
FROM Irenda Suns and V" a arre 1, P E, Stormwater Utlhty
RE CtJE-I 5-99
CC Mil.e Hepp, WA. State'Department Of Ecology
As mentioned in our earlier comments, this propo'sal is located within the aquifer sensibve area
(ASA) The Guidelines for Stormwater Management require that runoff from impervious areas
within the ASA must drain to grassed percolabon area (GPA) swales The applicant should
ensure that all environmentaliy hazardous matenals are contained and handied in accordance
with state and local regulations
11P0SEI00N►StcrmlStarmlDes,gn Re,ew Ccmmers.cue1559a dac
0-1/12l00 WED 09 05 FAg 508 892 4125 SPORANE YALLEY FIRE DEPT 4-*4 pLANNjNG 9004
y r -
~ A*00 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMEN-T
~ Spokane County Fire D/sfidct 1
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AYE o SPCJKANE WA 49206-3674 •(W 4281700 • FAX (Spq) 892 412.5
~
R. Pot Hurnphiies ~
CAlet
~
January 12, 2000
Tarttmy Jones
Department of BuiIding and Plannin8
1026 W 8roadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE Conddional Use Permtt
CUE-15-99
Deat Ms Jvnes
The Spakane Yalley Ffre Department has no objection to the issuance of this
conditionaf use permrt, so tong as cars are not painted on the premises If applicant
wants to paint cars, then they v++ill have to meet the requtrements of the Unrfiomn Fire
Gode
S~nce !y,
~
Ke ~n iller
Fire lnspector
e
r -
✓ ~
C~ ~ -
~
r'`
t (~Ll r~ 02 k`b
~ G► ~,I~l~ iyba~}j'~►0
A4J
~cj''~ ~ Q,,s 1~~ss
~0,3 S
CS ?e.e-7: Ly
rA
6 ~ ~ ~
~
~
Q o F~~ c~.l.~
~•,~v''''~~~ °c1 - _ L} ~
;?4r-r
~
aTr
S
C"56d
Report ID Rpt178 Fmal Bullcimg Perrruts 05/08i2000
Site Address Project Parcet File Mylar By Finalize Status
SPRAGUE E 15412 GOD FATHERS PIZZA REMODEL tNTER 45231 0103 B93175 Bob 12/14/1993
SPRAGUE E 15412 MONGOLIA BBQ RESTAURANT REMODEL 45231 0103 B97170 Dou 10/23/1997
SPRAGiJE E 15415 TACO BELL RESTAURANT 45144 2343 B93019 Paul 01/17/1995 Dead
SPRAGUE E 15426 T S BANK ADD REMODEL 4523 B91098 Bob 04/14/1992
SPRAGUE E 15510 W>LGREENS ADD INTERIOR REMODEL DRIVE T 45242 0438 B99208 GA 02/22/2000
SPRAGUE E 15530 NORTHWEST SEED & PET NEW STORE IN EXIST 45242 0430 B97055 Dou 09/09/1997
SPRAGUE E 15605 NIGi IOL5 SPEC RETAIL BLDG 45133 1339 B96110 Dou 04/15/1998 Dead
SPRAGUE E 15609 FRED ivlEYERS RETAIL STORE 4513 B92133 A 25 Bob 04/30/1993
SPRAGUE E 15609 A& W/ RADIO SHACK SPEC BLDS 45133 1339 B99180 GA 04/26/2000
SPRAGUE E 15614 OFFICE/STORAGE MTTI V1EW NURSERY 45242 0434 B94024 Chn 09/26/1994
SPRAGUE E 15624 DA[RY QUEEN REST 45242 0435 B95125 Dou 08/22/1995
SPRAGUE E 15701 FRED MEYER RETAIL CTR SPEC BLDG SHELL O 45133 1343 B98095 Dou 05/28/1998
SPRAGUE E 15808 STORAGE MINI 4524 B92062 Bob 04/01/1994
SPRAGUE E 15808 US WEST TOWER 100 WIRELESS COMMUNICAT 45242 0318 B00022 GA 02/09/2000
SPRAGUE E 15813 OPPORTUNITY AUTO SALES AUTO SALES LOT F 45133 1444 B98122 GA 09/1l/1998
SPRAGUE E 15823 NAPA AUTO PARTS 45133 1435 B99114 GA 02/04/2000
SPRAGUE E 15902 / 15906 OFF[CE MOBILE CORRAL MFG HOMES 45242 0208 B93152 Chn 03/30/1994
SPRAGUE E 15915 LES SGHWAB TIRES WHSE WAITING RM 45133 1551 B95122 Paul 10/24/1995
SPRAGUE E 16010 OFFICE WHSE 4524 B90052 Scot 07/05/1990
SPRAGUE fi 16104 VALLEY BLDG ADD EXPANSION MINI STORAGE 45242 0108 B93084 Chn 09/30/1993
SPRAGUE E 16104 GRAFOS MIIYI WHSE FAC 3 BLDG Q T U 45242 O11$ B98057 Dou 04/13/1998
SPRAGUE E 16215 SAVE MORE LUMBER WHSE 4513 B92129 Bob 06/49/1993
SPRAGUE E 16428 / 16508 EXISTING RETAIL BLDG ADD NEW FR OVERHA 45241 0121 B95094 Paul 06/15/1995
SPRAGUE E 16614 RIVERWIND CHG OF USE BOAT SALES 4524 B92046 Bob 08/12/1992
SPRAGUE E 16712 WADEFIELD MINl STORAGE 45241 9008 B93128 Chn 12/23/1993
SPRAGUE E 16728 SPRINT SPECTRUM TOWER 120 COMM F 035 45241 9008 B96105 Dou 07/02/1996
SPRAGUE E 16808 C9C C REMODEL & OCCUPAAICY GROCERY STO 45241 9007 B99193 GA 03/23/2000
SPRAGUE E 16819 MuTORCYCLE PARTS ADD BLDG 45134 1664 B94118 Paul 06/28/1995 Dead
SPRAGUE E 16823 AL''t) LAND WHSE RETAIL & MINI WHSE RETAI 45134 1663 B94002 Chn 04/29/1994
SPRAGUE E 16823 MOOFE MINI STORAGB 451341663 B95137 Dou 09/11/1995
SPRAGUE E 17002 ZIEGLhRS ADD 4524 B92022 Bo6 03/09/1992
SPRAGUE E 17017 MITCHELL PRNATE STG OF VEHICLES 45134 1773 B98040 K-07 GA 06/04/1998
SPRAGUE E 17123 VALLEY QUALITY HOMES OFFICE BLDG / RETA 55183 0815 B98114 K 20 GA 12/08/1998
SPRAGUE E 17128 VALLEY GROCERY & GAS CARETAKER RES 55192 9044 B96149 Dou 07/31/1996
SPRAGUE E 17204 ANDERSON DRAINAGE PLAN 55192 90 B96227 DO 12/16/1996
~
SPRAGUE E 17217 APPLEWAY HOMES MOB[LE HOME SALES 55183 0822 B95052 G-49 Kat 05/25/1995
SPRAGUE E 17702 UNITED BLDG SYSTEMS SALES OFFICE 55192 0202 B96071 Dou 05/16/1996
SPRAGUE E 18620 GREENACRES BAPTIST CHURCH ADD 5519 B91077 Bob 08/18/1992
SPRAGUE E 20100 1NTER ALTERATION 5520 B90221 Bob 06/15/1992
SPRAGUE E 20100 ADD WHSE FOOD PROCESSING PLANT 5522 B90249 Bob 12/27f1991
SPRAGUE E 4630 UMTED BUY & SELL WAM FURNITURE STORE 3523 890239 Bob 05/17l1991
SPRAGUE E 4808 BAKER SPEC RETAIL BLDG 35232 0303 B99060 L 04 10/0711999
SPRAGUE E 4824 DRAGON GARDEN REST ADD 35232 0304 895026 Paul 03/29/1995
SPRAGUE E 5033 BANKS OFFICE BLDG FOR CAR SALE LOT 35144 0102 898088 Dou 06/19/1998
SPRAGUE E S 101 HOME DEPOT RETAIL & GARDEN STORE t14714 35144 9090 B96003 Dou 02/13/1997
SPRAGUE E 5204 EAGLE HARDWARE HARDWARE STORE (OLD F 35231 9009 B93149 Bob 02/I5/1994
SPRAGUE E 5305 RETAIL CTR FURNITURE 3514 B90067 Bob 05/31/1994
SPRAGUE E 5605 HEILIG MEYERS FURNIT[JRE STORE 35144 9090 B99015 GA 03109/1999
SPRAGUE E 6310 SHOP ADD RV SERVICE 2324 B92014 Bob 43/18/1992
SPRAGUE E 6510 % ! RTUAL GOLF (AL S AUTO) INDOOR GOLF 35242 0201 894123 Paul 10/10/1994
SPRAGUE E 6511 SGI INDMART ADD STORAGE BLDG 35133 2612 B96184 Dou 10/23/1996
SPRAGUE E 6712 SUBtk AY ADD PARKING LOT GRADING 35241 1208 B97130 Dou 07/30/1997
SPRAGUE E 6721 MILESTONE RV CENTER RV SALES 35241 1201 B97127 Dou 09/09/1997 Dead
SPRAGUE E 6722 MILESTONE RV CENTER DISPLAY OFFICES 35241 1201 B97141 Dou 09/17/1997
SPRAGUE E 6818 CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH ADD REMODEIJLJSED C 35241 1101 B95081 Dou 07/28/1997 Dead
SPRAGUE E 7102 SHIOA HUI LEE CARETAKERS RES DOUBLE WID 35241 9004 B96162 Paul 07/18/1996
Page 25 of 31 ~
~
,
~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO: Spokane County Planning Depart nt
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads 7etmlt.DATE: July 28, 2000 j
PROJECT: HOME INDUSTRY AUTO DETAILING
FILE CUE-0015-99/ Hearing: 08/16/2000 @ 10:30
Review Date 01 /13/2000
Sponsor/Applicant: MICHAEL & STACEY HOWELL
Section Township Range: 07-25-44
Planner: TAMMY JONES
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
2. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
3. The applicant should be advised that an approach permit must be obtained from the Spokane
County Engineer Department prior to the construction of any new driveway approaches. This
must be done prior to the release of a building permit.
4. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the
following:
CC: Applicant MICHAEL & STACEY HOWELL
Engineer/Surveyor
P1anr.er TAD4MY JONES
1
(
Page 2 08/16/2000 01/13/2000
CUE-0015-99
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to
be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property
in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement
District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District
pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their
ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.0301
and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and
successor(s)further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID
by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID
is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on
the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID
by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the
Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final
assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair
value improvement(s) add(s) to the property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road
Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at
the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements
without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of
execution below. This provision is applicable to Utah Avenue from which the subject parcel
takes access.
END
IAECE VED
S P O K A N E O U I1VLT~, i-xiuOO
DNLSION OF Pi.ANTTING A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC W ~~`y,~~I,IOs
MICHAEL V. IVEEDH~.M, DIRECTOR GARY~CJBECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball
Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry
Fire District No. 1
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority; Chuck Studer
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner ~
DATE: July 20, 2000
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing
FILE CUE-15-99
DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry to allow auto
detailing in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone pursuant to
Section 14.616.240(4) of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
STR: 7-25-44
APPLICANT: Michael Howell, 8124 E. Utah, Spokane, WA 99212, 509/892-9671
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency.
Please review and return any comments to me by August 3, 2000.
Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing
1026 W. BROADWAY • S('OKANE, WASHItiGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FA!C: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133
• ' ,
NUTICE UF PUBLIC HEA.RING
SFOKAiNE COUNTY HEARING E R
TO: All interested persons, and ownersltaxpayers within 40(} feet
YUU ARE HEREB'Y NC1TIFIED 'I'HA'I' APUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LANI] USE AFPLICATIQN LIS'I`EI) BELOW, AS FULLOWS:
Application: File No. CUE-1 5-99, Conditivnal Use Permit for a Home Industry to allaw auta detailing
in the existing Urban Residential-31.5 (UR-3.5) zone pursuant ta Section 14.616.240(4) of the 5pokane
County Zaning Code.
Hearing Date and Time: August 16, 2000 @ 9:00 a.m.
Place: Cammissivners Assembly R.oom, Lower Level, Spokane Cotinniy Public 4Vorks Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washing'ton.
fJwnerlAppiicant: Michael Howell, 8124 E. Utah, Spvkane, WA 99212, 5091892-9671
Address and Location: Generally located s4uth of and adJacent to Utah Avenue and appraximately 150
feet east Qf Uick Road in the NW V4of Sectian 7, Township 25N., Range 44 EWM, Spvkane,
V+Jashington.
Compreheasiv+e Plan: Urban
Zonin.g Designatinn: L3rban Residential-3.5 (UR.-3.5)
Enviroumen#al De#ermiaafion: A Deterninatian af Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the CQUnty
Division of Planning, as the lead ageney on July 2$, 2000. The comment perivd ends August 14, 200+0,
Deadline far submitfiiing SEFA Appeai: [note: only applies to admin.i,strative appeals to the Hearin~
Examiner, not to xnitial applications such as rezanes car preliminary plats].
Related Permits: nIa
Dzvision Qf Plannin~ Staf~`: Tammy Jones, Assc~ciate Planner, (509) 477-7200
14EARING EXAIVQNER PR+DCEnURES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of prQCedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolutian No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit wntten cornments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side af the issue is encouracred. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the recard established before the Hearincy Exami.ner,
pursuant to CountyF Resolution Nos. 96-4171. Environmental appeals wiil follaw the sarne procedural
route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are aecessible to
persans with physical disabilities.
Inspection of File, +Copies of Documents: A 5taff Report will generally be available far inspection
seven days before the hear'ing. The Staff Repart and applicatian fle may be inspected at the Spokane
County D'zvisian of Planning, 15t Floor Permit Center, Public WQrks Buiidincr, 1026 W. Broadway,
Spnkane, WA 99260-0220, between 8: i0 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidavs. Cc~pies
of documents tivrll be made avaiiable ~'or the cost of reproduction. If you have any c~uestions or special
needs, please call the Division af (509) 477-7204, Send written camments ta the Spokane County
Division of Plannina, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Tammy Janesr'Gt,JE-I5-99.
ivZations must be made in Nvritincr and submitted to the Spakane Caunty Hearinc, Ex,amminer, 3`d Floor,
public Works Build.incy, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, 4vA 99260-0245.
~
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NLTMBER: CUE-15-99
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry to allow auto
detailing in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (tIR-3.5) zone pursuant to Section 14.616.240(4)
of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
HEARING DATE AND TIME: August 16, 2000 @ 9:00 a.m.
APPLICANT: Michael Howell, 8124 E. Utah, Spokane, WA 99212, 509/892-9671
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located south of and adjacent to Utah Avenue and
approximately 160 feet east of Dick Road in the NW '/4 of Section 7, Township 25N., Range 44
EWN1, Spokane, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available
to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted oo later
than 4:00 p.m., August 14, 2000, if they are inteoded to alter the DNS. All comments should be
sent to the contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Tammy Jones Title: Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0220 (509) 477-7200
~
,
DATE ISSUED: Julv 28 , 2000 SIGNATURE: AIM~4
COMiv?[ENT'S REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT HEARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be macle to tlle SPOKANE
COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project.
This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections.
Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard
3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services; Bill Hemmings
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwater Uti(ity; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Rejional Health District; Steve Holderby
7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
8. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer
9. Fire Protection District No. 1
, ' .
• • . County Public Works,
Transportation . • - o
1 • o County • •
Memo
To: Tammy Jones
From: Scott Engeihard
~
File CUE-15-99
Applicant: Howell
Date: June 13, 2000
RE: Operations Plan
I have reviewed the Operations Plan and the attached e-mail summary. Based on the
information submitted there are no changes to the January 4, 2000, comments.
.
'''''2.f•t~~'.
a+S P O K A N E U f,-: i
PLANNING A DNISION OF THE PUE3LIC WORK~, 1>1 !
,_1 rt
,011',~~( WA„0M :~I
TU: SpUka.llt' C,OUllty D1V1S1UI1 Of EI1gII1ceI'lIlg alld IZUaCIS; Scott Engtlhard c/o Sanclv
Kimball
Spokane Regional Health District; DOIl LyI1Cl1
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
-
DA"['I,:
5U13JLCT: Upeiatioils I'luil, LUL-15-91)
Attached is an explanation of operations for a proposed home industry for auto detailing, CUE-15-99.
Please review and contact me at 477-7225 if additional information is necessary.
Attachment
1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
YHONE: (509) 477-7200 9 FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDU: (509) 477-7133
i J
RECEIVED
SPOKqIVE COUNTY
.
MAY 3 0 2000
`c ~♦lO~li t~ ~ ~ y~~or~cF~~r=►~ : DMSION QF PLqNNING
iis is C) c-xp c-T cTCr-Aticris _it 's] )4 ~ 1-_; ~~~)P
l 3 ~ ~f~!1 ~Ct1l~C(~St= /F~.7t ;
.lldl.ti\_l\ J11] (!!1 (~:.1i1 ! lE l:f1.J~ t-5l.~~~~~ 1t=E 11~= ~I.
V_14 il,Jlll.\%."1S ).Srt-tl . l IilicfiCi Jvcs~
~ 1c Ifltct lCr(~,1~1l 1!=?fl ~7vf1tcl.fl' "l Sll
ClJ! ;lf Cllt~l~\ lJSlil "j S'J1 ftl '=!C 51:'~~,:1 Lj F11~.
»xl~ _ fC 11 C Irnirl] Ic`\ fc rC1.~_lii r (,'r I cliFS ir) ['_iirll, uSirl] cc (-,)r= mifr_ I
Ai;~Fitj i_c I ::Is :If s itic 's)ii FAIill r
`;cI_- ftIc`E -1is .
.~1 s I n
~~~C`]SICtI;] ij. CUi -qtl,_ =111TI S-~Jti;, f lE~ SL1PtlCE SCr;7tr 1F_.
N~.11 ?{r~ 11-11 I~~L 1,,-~~~~ rf-T~.~-a-~~~~.
.
KIti~ 3 7~3sic fillics c_]r ds "'ki s~
ti3~
f+j =Il 4 "f:~+-f~~l~~= ~=11JIS I: fl 1tis. ~ I(ljii'!l 1f1._j. 1'1l:: ~~1►1.=~.~ f~. ~
~ tJc~~ 1J~C_ !_J11y qus,sti(;r)s (:rJSF CCilt_.Ict;
~ 11 A~ r;F ,S#JCCLj [~,C`Ovt'
2 (5 /-1
f
` ~ ~ " _ •vr{~w
s., TammY
Jone
.11: ::r..:$+:sP ' aa-SX... . ~ . .r...: . . D... iFrom: mongoosespark [SMTP:mongoosespark@netzero.net]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 11:55 AM
To: Jones, Tammy
Subject: Re: Operations plan
Tammy,we have an average of two to three vechiles here per day,we have no employees liv'!;,c,
on site we average one to three cus`-nm--rs r-,!;r
'weekl;y visit from our distributor.
If you have any other questions please let us know, fvlike&5tac2y Howt!:
Original Message
From: Jones, Tammy <TMJones(~spokanecountv.orq>
To: 'Mongoosespark@netzero.net' <Monqooses1D2rk0netzero.ne
Date: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 2:57 PM
Subject: FW- Operations plar
>
From: Jones, Tammy
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 12:11 PM - To: `Mongooses ParkCcD,netrero.net <mailto:Park(ccDnetzero.net> `
Subject: Operations plan
Mike & Stacy,
I received your operations plan for your proposed home industry. I would
like to ask that you also submit information estimating the numbers of cars
that you may be working on at any one time, and also the number of
customers
that visit your property on a daily basis. This would also include any
business related deliveries. Be sure to specify the numbers of employees
outside of the family living on the site. Once I receive this information,
the only thing I will be waiting on is the mailing packet that needs to be
submitted. A public hearing cannot be scheduled until the public mailing
has
been sent out by the Division and the comment period of 14 days is over.
Thank you,
Tammy Jones
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World '
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
• .
- OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
~
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
Ad rffI , "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TO: Spokane County Planning Depa rtment j
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads ~ t,~~
DATE: January 4, 2000 7
PROJECT: HOME INDUSTRY AUTO DETAILING
FILE CUE-0015-99/
Hearing: @
Review Date 01 /13/2000
SponsorlApplicant: MICHAEL & STACEY HOWELL
Section Township Range: 07-25-44
Planner: TAMMY J4NES
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
2. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
3. The applicant should be advised that an approach permit must be obtained from the Spokane
County Engineer Department prior to the construction of any new driveway approaches. This
must be done prior to the release of a building permit.
4. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the
following:
CC: Applicant MICHAEL & STACEY HOWELL
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner TAMMY JONES
~ Page 2
O1/13/2000
CUE-0015-99
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to
be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in
interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property
in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement
District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District
pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their
ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030,
and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative
resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW.
If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and
successor(s)further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID
by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID
is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s)
shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on
the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID
by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the
Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final
assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from
assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair
value improvement(s) add(s) to the property.
It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road
Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at
the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RI D or served by the improvements
without any monetary participation by Spokane County.
The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of
execution below. This provision is applicable to Utah Avenue from which the subject parcel
takes access.
END
l
+z LIL~
1 ~
e~'
a`` ' .
~ ~(J
ie, it i~ Gz l~!
~ t c
p ~ c~ s
~
PAGE 1 1 09:40:26 20 DEC 1999
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
05015 UTAH AV (START) .000 EASTERN RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
UTAH AV .130 DOLLAR RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
UTAH AV (END) .330 MARIETTA AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
05016 UTAH AV (START) .000 COLEMAN RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
UTAH AV .170 BOWMAN RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.260 PARK RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.390 CENTER RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.530 ELLA RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
.650 DICK RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
UTAH AV (END) .770 VISTA RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20
2 Records Processed
►
RECE VED
- ~
DEC ] 7 zomn
SPOKA1VEf'!-,'
)ames L. b{anson, C.B.O., Director
MEMORANDLT?N'.,'
TO: SPokane County Division of Engineering; 5cott En;~lehard c/o San~:, I
Kimball
Spokane County Development Engineering Services: Bill HemnlinR~
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Hol~':cri~~:.
Spokane County Stormwater Utilitv; Brenda Si' ~
Spokane County Fire Protection District No.
Irvin Water District
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
DATE: December 17, 1999
RE: CUE-15-99; Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry to alloNv auto
detailing in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone rtm~tinnt ~.Section 14.616.204(4) of the Spokane Cotintv Zoning Codc.
"I-he Spokane County Division of Building & Plallning accepted the above-referenced
preliminary plat as a"counter-complete" application on December 10, 1999. Acceptance
of the preliminary plat application and designating said application as "counter complete"
vests the application for review with respect to current regulations and for review to
detennine technically complete status. The County now has 28 calendar days to circulate
the application to affected agencies for their review. Additional information may be
requested by affected agencies allowing the County to determine if the application is
techniczlly complete. If additionaI information is requested, the 28 day time period will
be suspended until adequate information is received. For this application, the "desian
review" process will not be utilized and your specific review comments are requesteci
: L:~~cnc~:~►- cnriiwer?t pet•i~~d which c~~ld'~ 1 1000.
i`~111. 1~!1~~~:lll YL~~ll i~.~1C.`1 ~~llilli~i.l~l i~l~:.~..;<<■'i lsl.~~irie..k 1.,1i• <l;llil 11: lil~ :>>1~
of inemorandum or letter. If you have any questions regarding the application -Ind re~~iC ~
1"7"7_~~--
I
I
I
I
lu~o W. FiRUAUtiVA'i • 5i'vt~110L, V;:',;iiiAv1il,v
PxorE: (509) 477-3675 • FAx: (509) 4774703 • TDD: (509) 4i;-7i1-,
~
. r
~
A l APPLlCATlON FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
,
CUP'S, VARIANCES, NON-CONFORMINS USES
D1VIS10N OF BU(LDING AND PLAN
NING
SPO~.--~NU COUNM
erty Owner(s): ln
~ ~r c:.t Address: 7i aq (J-r4k-4-
:
CiL;': 0 Z;G Ccde: ---2
(Hcme) - -7 / (VVor'') t=ax:
f';PPLICANTIAGENT INFORMATION
APP I ica nt/Ag ent: k.c.v\, Ac
~l 71-
L1 ~--/CL•:~ J~ci; . ( , L:~' ~C'C;~. % `~r,~ I ~
v -
Ph one- (Hcme) I OJ`lork) Fax:
-
R,rQ) uES T cD A c i!o,', 1 s(s) (Ir, uic~;:. r;~::~, c~t;cn)
;
Conditional Use Permit O Expar-, sicr-, o ~ a N c;-, c;:nrc;m ,nr Us~
0 O:l-,'CI /I-J1,
PROJECT INFORMAT10N ,l
• Existing use of property:
• Describe proposcd us2 of the property,,notina ch~in~~e- J'r~.m
~
~ ~ ' ~ ~~✓',-:(ici~1~,.=, cGpilCc(IGn, Sicic il lC CCi:C Sia mCci c ci C C;S`.~ iCC ii c'JZficl-IC
c= SC~: _ _
C'~mDa~c~~a te- rmS (l.e., 50 fee} from centerlIf1E VerScS feG',I:IfCd E-5 ic°t)'
,
'1:SG
i f not, has one or more variances been requestzd: Y N' ~ lr home industry, hds consultation occurrzd with the Divisie oi EL~icir: _
ticlmof bu~~d"n~or intended usz? Y N N
,
~ . ?
1
' .
APPUCATIONS FOR PUBUC HEARfNG ITEMS PAGE 2 Of 3
CUP. Variance. Non-conformina Uses
• Size of the subject property Parcel No.(s): qj=.~
• Street address of property (if known): Ll 2 ~t i'.4-f.4
• Legal description of property include easement, ii applic2ble):
l~pct4ri2o 1~4'~ ~
Q 41/- LV L24:3
Z
LS~',~1~n:~~_s,~~_
• Source of legal: /NL~ 7
• Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent:
~ . A_. _ _ . _ . . . n / ~ . .
State or Washington)
SS
County of Spokane )
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that: (1) I am the owner or r~ccrd or ~ut,`~or,zcd ag~n; ;cr
the proposed site; (2) if not the owner, written permission from owner authorizing my 2c:iors
on his/her behaif is attached; and (3) ali of the above responses and those on supportinc
documents -zire made truthfully and best my owledg
Signe _ Da - ~
~
N P biic in r e ate ashingtcn, res;dinQ
, M appoint nt expires
BURDEN OF PROOF FORM(S) (by appiicant)
It is necessary for the appiicant or his/her representative to establ;~3`~
requested action should be approved and to litzraf(y put forfh the basic argument in fa,: ~7r c-
approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your
requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you przsent your c=.
way which addresses the criteria which the Hearino Examiner must censider. Pfeas-
cI mrte te th~, form ~nd r~}! 1rn ,~/~:n ycur 2pplication.
FOr STr,Fr= USc OtiLY
Szction ~ Township 4-iZ! Range Violation/EntorcemEnt
Lot, legal & add'l. ownership check d y:
Person doing preaop conf.: ~flffi
Oihvrr"P;"c`1lclJS DIV1S,Gn OT EG!)Gr!nC c Planning cCilCfiS
- -
CErifcate of Exe mptior No. hpplication Nc.
r=2rino DGte Varicus site plan Cimensions cheCk ~ 10;;
a . '
• i
. 1
APPUCATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS PAGE 3 of 3
CUP. Variance_ Non-conformin4 Uses
SIGN-OFF 6Y AGENCIES
The applicant must visit e2ch agency whose number is circled below. / I
1. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT ~a. Proposed method of water supply - qli-
1*4" b. Proposed method of szwaae disposal
A preliminary consultation has hepn held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been infor f
requirements aR9 standards. We re st consultation with the Division of Buiiding & Plannin N
~ / "~Z G pv_ .
Si9rrerrure Dal~e /
2• ER PURVEYOR:
a. Propos thod of water supply
b. The proposal isJis no ted wit i e bou § our future service area.
.
c. The proposal isrs not 'c t d the boundary or our current dis'JieL
d. We are/are not aNV rve t his site with a uate water.
e. Satisractory arrangements have/have not been madE 2rve this proposal.
Signature Date
3. SEW DISPOSAL PURVEYOR:
~
a. Proposcd me oc~of water supply
\
b. Proposed methed of sz~Ma al
~
A pre!iminary consultation has b n heid to"aiscuss the proposal. The applicz-nt has been informed of
requirements and standards.
~
Signature Date
4. FIRE DISTRICT / FIRE MARSHALL
a. Proposed is within Fire Protection District
b. Adequa;e arrnaement have/have not bean made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes
c. Recommendnd fire flow: ~/A ; or unable to calculate now ber2usz use is rct
definitive and will be detertnined at building permit application time.
d. P,equirzments include: tI4 %s-r-t
1N EXC.c 5S QF b' `~'T. ~7~.
AN1~ 1lGT ~j~lU C~ A LT£T'c_t~ r
_ A,11) ,
12 Signature e/ Fire District K Date
. . _
A~.. ~ P•_..Ic , ry :r^5--y- ~C-=~
~ , •as ~ r--
~dy~
p, = 9
E~~ ~ ' C~ ' r
r~ V~
SPtJ -KANE E1'I Y IROlYMENTAL U LIDINANU L
fJ EV Ti OPI ; 1. 10. 2v U ~ T
! I
A. BACKGROLND ' FII.E/PROjECT N0.
1. 11",Iame of proposed project, if appLcable:
2. ~iame oF applicznt:
3. Aedress ar.d phone nurnber of aOplic:InE and conzac: pe:son:
.
k, 11 Lv/+ V ~ 27-! ~
Date checklist preps*ed:
5. ACenct• requeszir:g c; ec k-list:
,
V
6. Proposed ti.:zina or sche'ule (includir.~ ph~sji1;, if a~plic~ole):
~ '
N ~ - ~
l
, . .
~
h~r..!•1 LL`. - ~ ~
`=IJt.~_.~ 1..._...~...._~ c
.J
i
. A
A. BACIiGROLIND (conrinue#
11. Give a brief, cornolere dzsc::pcion of your proQOS 2, includ:~-~g the pronose~ uses and the size of t'rle proje-z :.r-.d
sice. There are several quesuons later in this checkliszz LhaL ::sk- you to desc.ibe cerain aspe-rs of yoLr proposal.
You do not need to repe:.c those :uns we:s on chis pn~a_
x x L--r ~
_ -
C. i 'ZC,
, j
12. Location oF che p:oposal. Gi~e sufricienc informauon for a pe:50A CO L::e~e.-szand the pre~:se locaz'ou of ~-ou-
,
proposed project, includin~ a streec address, if an ,:.nd section, towns-ia~a ranae r r
I P a, if l:nown. I_ a p_ opcssl
'would occur ove: a r:s.nce of ares, provid° ihe rin,e or bounearizs of cze si:e(s). Provide u 1z~a1 dzscriptjon,
~ .f ,1 , bI ~ .
site plan, l~'1C1I11Lti" Zi::as7, and tooo~~aphic Mao, l. I2"'SOP_s0 a~'v;s.ll:~ e. ~~ni?e y ou should stbr,lic a..r?V PIa.i:S
required by che age::cy, y ou are not requ:red co CLOLcatz msus or deca.iled p.ans submired -with a.-Ir pe .-~st
applicaEion re?sLed to th;s checklis.
~ - 2 s - u
1 ~ ~-(A'
'c: ~ z A: e:. (.-~S:~) = 1 ne G~ne: ul Se~z e- $e; ice ~~re-: 1he
11. Does Lh- prooosz~ action l~e within the nquite: Se:~sI , _
Prioricy SeR-e; Sz: ~ ice tSres~ Thz Cicy of Spo~.:re? (See: Spo~ane CoLnr:'s r'~S:~ O~-erla,: zone A.?as io_
boundaries).
~ ~
n, J('.11J,'SI r! f ►
. 1~
k, cl ` C-
~
J
- - - . - - -
~
y r~'S
/ - ~ . •
.~v~ i ' ^ • ' "
~ ~ r i. 1 t• . . ~J 1 . .
't
Evaluation For
Acency Use Only
E0,ENT:~L ELE:tiIENTS (Concinue:~):
b. -~'.bou~ wh~t Percent of the site jvill be covered -wizh L-npe. ti:ous surscP,.s ..Le; ~
r) • t^. . ` :
construction (for example, aspnal: or buildin-s)? "
' i'•~''~~:: ~y ~iJ r~:iL'C2 Of CUf?Li01
,.~i1uL L'v'~~ • - - ~ - . ; , ' _ 7 _ • - , .
~ - ~ " l:i~ .i~. ~r..'.~~_. i _':,~!i 1, ~ ,i~~.i~ `1.L,~ l.:l
1=-tomobile, odors, ilzdusuial, ~;oad s:noke) during consZruc:~on and TYhen [;.z rC,
- • - ~~~~Q.' If 2F7 0~e;~er ~ r F
y, . illy descr . ibe and o~ive ap~,ro:~unatz
6
. ,
. . i"._~` L-• _ . C_ Ut
_ . _ _ ~e~~ii~~. ~ jI •
0 r c 0 111.~L/i c~Ji:.~i
. . _
j~-
_
_ Cnec'_. " -
. ' 1 Evaluacion For
:A.Qency Use Only
B. ENVZR0NiNYIE~Tr1L ELEN1ENTS (Continuccl):
b) Does the proposal involve any discnar~es of wa.se rlate=i ~s to sur:.ce ~~ate;s? If so,
describe the tvpe o{ wase and anLici~a:e~ volur::e o~ c:scnarcle.
, ,
b. C rour.ci:
1) V`ill g-oundw;,te- be withdra-vvn, Or wi_1i_ .~ate: be discza: Jed to grou;:
C Q aaie:?
i'•"~ °?ne-al descrin-pi:on, purpose, an~ a-pp'oxi'==aze euanticies if known.
J
~De'`=' j~'Z "'"aSzz I71aLZ:ial tnac svill be discha.ged lnto rhe a:oune from s~~c~c tx,S or
cc-her sar:ita,-y- vvasze t:eatmenc facility. Descnoe tne gene:al s:ze oi the sJSrem.,
tne nLmbe; ol' houses to bz se: ved (if applic3ole), or t`ne
, ~ •
Ge:sons the systemn(s) a:? expec.ed to se--,re.
,
~6`7
Desc, ibe u: ~ ~ ~ ~ ' s;-sZz,-r.s, otne: than troslo 'e_siig,ned f~r t:~e C~spos.:1 of s!r-*ta:-,r W;~Z,-~
I 's~~lled for the i ~ ~ i ~ be.o~Y t vrou~-i.~. + s,f wc,. a ~ ~it-v
p~.-posz o~ eisch3r~iro ~ fl~.ids he ~~.r.IC:LQ.,j~
s; stzrns such ;3s thosz for the eisposal of sZOCI71 R''aL~: or c'raina-Oe f:or! Irloo:
Describz the tti-pe af s; sze:. , the amounc of mace:i:~l to be ~isposed oi .:ou~R F~,e
s ~ szem a.nd thz types of nacerials L~:ely to be disposed o= (inclucin~ maT-.
. , ~ ..-ials t~hich
ma; ente: the s-~-szC.-n inadve: tenclv th: oL-n spills or as a res-ult of fi: e figh ti,-jg
:,.C~?': i~I^~'.$>. •
1
' . .
0_~:-.=r:c~ ;?is_ P c .
r!
- l. . _ .
~
. , Evaluation For
Aeency Use Oniy
ENViF0NMENTAL ELE.tiIENi S (Continued):
ou~d, ~d ~nof~ zvater L~pars, if
. Proposed melsures to reduce or cont~ ol sur~~ce, Q-
an (if the ro osed action lies withzn t~ie AQUiSens~tive Area be es~eci~.Ily clea; on
Y p p . • ' 3b(5), a.nc 3c(2) of this
e:cplanations relacinj to faciL•cies conce'n~a Sectio~s ~o~~?>
checklist).
~f
PLA tiTS
Check circle tyges ot ve~etation foLnd on the site:
' . alde:, m:..~le, aspe:~, other
deciduous tre_?.
evera-een t: ee: fir, c-da:, pLne, oche:
V shrubs
✓ Clrass
pasture
crop oc a-din
wec soil plancs: cattail, bette:cuo, bullrush, sKun1{ tsbbaae,
ocher
wute- pla-~zs: ~;atzr lily, eel~r:ss, rrilfoil, othe~
othe: z;; pes oi ve-etsL=on
b. What kind and a-mount of ve;e:acion will be removed or alzeree?
~
Ai'01
c. List o r en c:~:-~ge: soecies knoNn to be or. or near t~:z sitz.
N0
e. Proposed LS2 OI I::,.i~e pl:~rits, Of ot~.`_ .r .r:
on
ees---: e o: ea'.ny~c~ ti~eg?cacion tne s~t~, an,
1::easu: es ta -
i
/
_a - • . ~
~
- 1 .
, 1 f7 B. E`VZF011MENTAL ELEMENTS (Continucd):
c. \Vhat k:nds of ene: ga}• conservation fenLU: Lisz othe; p;aposed measures to reduce or cortrol e:ie:-;
.AJ
^ • i . . . , . - . • l : i ~ "t.-1 L 1 . :
a- Are there any enviror.mental hea?zn hazards, ir.clLC'::.~ -
risk of fi. e ' ' -
~ and etiplosion, spill, or h3z:: dous wasze, t::at couia occLr as a res.:.
proposal) Ir so, describe. -
✓/~i
2) Pi OpOS,
-C IT1z;iC`. zS LO L'eCL'Ct' Oi COnLi OI e:?v:rOP.i'sCrIC.il
he-,Izh k-s,
b. ~ois~
~
1) ~:t' h,;z t}-pes o: noise e:usz in the a: ea wi]ICfI !J'1av ahecc you:
trs~i'_ . ~,,Lt~^Z~::I, C,--~•.__:O"1, OC:..a_l:
.~;~~c:s~~•~ '
L,•
-r•c~ C:s of r.ai~e;voL!': oe cre:.ce.. o•i o:
0:! 07 1GZ~-:t':I?~ ~'i:iS:S (iGC e:{::rI1pIe: t::iilC, COIISi.=L:Ci:C_.
t- ~
~
C_
~e s:.~.
~,ou: s r:ois- :voul~ come f: om z
1 ' ~ •~i~`~ - ~~r"~,~ ~~~~~if , ',.4L (Z
J , ~--~-i-'"-~ - - ,
l y ; _
Spo'.-:~--- 07.O: C:._~~.i~s~
. ~ ~
A «enc•.~ 1_1~~ c~ - i
B. ENVZFpNMENTAL ELENN1EN75 (Coniinucd):
f:
Cc,.... P?~..
;
!S ti ~ CL.: . . _ . ' - . : : : . ` _ _ ~ ' I
i
n ! l1'
. _ - _ . ~ - - ~~,.:i `.,~.,~:_:c'_. ~t_ _ . . . _
Iz- so, specifti-.
,
i- ro:.a.elv L (D mpe:- , ' . ' - ~ : ' • - ~ .
;
C~
t +
-
- e :o:. ~.~.n; peop1c waeIe~ che co.~p:e~ec pro•;~r, e~s~l~cz.
.
k. Proposed m.easu: es zo a-.oid or- reduce d•,splacement i.m1:
.
za e:asu:%~ proflosai
t:.ses
, - . ~ ,
7 . . . I
. Evaluation For
B. E'--,47-VIRO: ; . , , .
11. LIGHT aND GLARE
a. V'hat LYpe oE lig hL or glare rv;ll zne propos.:1 proc~ue' G'IPa: ti*r.e of ea,,• ~ould i~
P.1V OCCLIr' ~ 2 1 ~
/L ~ ~t, r
b. COLlQ l!`~jl[ r Q f: . ' r- ba =o:~ ~ n r'c
~ o ~1:~:,. om the ~tn:s~ed pro e..~ e sa:~ o.
c. ofi- '
'~~'•n~ s' ~l~ ~ sources of li~' ~l o; b ~la:e m:~;.~:1 c~ jour propcsa.%
c. P- , ,
ocose:~ io : e~uce c~- cont: ol li;nE a.e gl:~ e i.-npac~s, ir a::,,:
12. R r Cc _T: ATI
3. :i~ G'~`SI^i?sC°•:~ C °S a:° ln ifsz 11T_i.^.~.^_Iai° VICintiV?
I J
. ~
t::= an•;
, ~
L,
. - ~ ~
B. EVVI---~ONti1rT.AL E? E.ti1: NTS (Concinuc:;):
~
c. How m:ny parkinc" sDaces would the corr:nle-L^
project eliminatc~-
,
E~.'
~r ti L
11! Lh- p; pPoSal require anv ne'vV roads or sue--CS, Oi 1.:,Dr0ve,Tie :1LS i0 e:r~Sz:Z2Cy r0ac_'.;
or streets, noc i~:, c:.-
use (or occur in ci:e im;::= _ : ~ . : . _ -
.:C u1ir I:;ps pe: G:; f ;vGUlci bC
~ ~ ~ u~ woulc occ:
I ` _ !t: or~ n, ~l~c., ~en pea:~ vol ,_es
ProZ~osec r.easu: es [o re_,c. or Co,'1C: OI Ir1f1SDOf1i:on
.
~ , • ~~C:. :.°J'.:.: L: :ii: 1: ~.i~:}5~:. .vi r%l_...__ ,
- - • _ - ' ~,-',~;.nl~ ~-r~.-~,: I, c-c_--~- -
_ - ~ •
TV L
FOR STAFF USE QNLY
Staff NIember(s) Reviewino, Checklisz: Based on tnis stafr revietv oE the en~i:onme^ja1 c:~ecllir ~Sd ocne:, pertinenL ins
_or:n:.tion, t4~e s,~;}:
, • • ' ' ,
A. Concludes th:.t the: e a: e no prob:ole sr~nit• .icant 3aversz lmpacts a.~d recommenns a
decerm,in3tion of nonsigniiical'Ice (D'•~S)•
B• Concludes th:.c prooaole s:gnificanc adverse envi: onmenta] impaczs do exist for the cur: e:i:
• r•
proposal and recomrnends a mili;aLed deLe:.:linsnon o nonsignifica.nce R•ich concitions (~,IDNS).
C. Concluces thsz there are proo:.ble significa-rit adve: se environrient;xl impacts and rzccmme::r_'s
a dece: mination of significsnce (DS).
REFrR TO FEE SCHEDL"LE FOR FILING FrE
~ ~ , i
~
1
;AV~ ~
~r ~ ~ ~roacH
. . q::•, f ~ i`..
,_~`~~'j;~'~~.. •.`,'1~,,:: .~,:^~`i~ ~'i'•~, ~ Y ^
. ~ , ~ ~J• ~L-
~ i:•~~~.•~ .y
"rr• ..=i~:. , RECEVED
~j ~ ' , , t ~ ~ \
~^.~:~.y~ ~~~1~,. ~ f
..~;'~f''~*- ~ -9':_ ~~•K~+i~;: t ,~j. *c, ~
_ ~ ~4 ~'a. ,r ~ orYlT 10 20M
; . , ~,~'~.li '
' i~ h~<<~,; i: ot'l . ~'r ' ' k~ Y
:;•~i:' • :~'SL 7
15r Ve
1;2~~, S%mlAmGOImIYEKVMM
~y
4ezo~ '7, ~
5bP
c4p
P~~S
h ,
~
~'l~ ~~N~ ~
(Y
scaLE: 400' M I L LwoCO
r LIet2RTY
j
Da I t~, ~
v'
A v y
4 0 I U I ~I I 4 A ~I t~~~►D l~ I~ ~--L~1.A4 1
r~uT'Ci RA
- - - . . _ -
a~ / J pw~!~f ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~o ~ . -t ~
~
z33 232 O1~a;'~t~;~.
°
W
.23~ Z3b , 37
O
~ ~ •;:r'1 Q ~ N ~ ~ ~ ; . 1 ~ C
It A/ 2w0 : 239
A/;r ~ : 8 r ~Rw _ z 238
i ► ► 1 ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~~~~R N! ~~A ~ - 5~.~3'+~, ~ 1 ~ \ Ot L ~ - '
' y. ~ • r..~ ~ ~ l/ . ~ I \ .
OzA2 . 2A3 a 2.c'~- 2,t5 ~ ~ O~ , s
~ 1 ~s} f' ~•h u. ~j0 - - - • . ~►fi - .1 C ~'~-T~
Z/~8 2~( 7 ~ i?
tu ' 10
/
z.s~ ZS2 253 ~ VyllrI q - ' Xw 1
w
r. ~ • 'f, y~ G.
~ . ;7.. N ~ ~ ` ` ,C , ~ ~ ` t
gucKEY[ AVe. z> 2$7
25-6 p A_ ,e' 2 5'¢ ^ 'nucxF~~ w~/~..~~ =~b' ~ 7
cK~e _
~?~r►2
.Y]E-- 34.5' 4 ±
-425 - - - - - - -
2S8 25-9 260
t o 261
„ ti~ ' ~ ~ _ ~ 1 ~
'
263 262 _ • ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ R I f Tr~ - .4 r A.
l
~
. ~
a I
183 /82 / $Q
t
/ 3 r~r :;.~i~, f.~•, . v ~ 4 ~ ' : K
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 1999 1:21 PM
To: Jones, Tammy
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Sims, Brenda; Miller, Katherine; Darrell, Virginia; Davis, Tom
B&P
Subject: CUE-15-99 - Mike Howell
12-21-99
I have no comment on this proposal and consider it to be technicaly complete.
Page 1
Parcel; 45072.2111
Owner: HOWELL ETAL, MIKE B 8 STACEY
CoOwner:
Owner Address T~S
8124 E UTAH AVE SPOKANE WA 99212-2129 USA ci
Site Address
8124 E UTAH AVE SPOKANE
I
m juJ
ICD r
Legal Description ~ ~ ~ ~
I O J
ORCHARD AVE ADD REPLAT BLKS 151 T0154-178-179&225 E150 ' OF {
TR 231 EXC S 108'
~
~ 1~.~-- ~ l ` ~
~ ~ 1=--
~ ~-__t.
_ U) M
}
;
_ `D y , i ~
r m
~
I
~
Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depictetl on this map is general & subject to constant revision. Il is intended for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriafe agency.
il
I
~
CUE=15=99
Vicinity Map
cnn.~`.~Tt a
0 ~
11 rqN W Z •
4 I i a p •
. ~ ° o tn c ol CaRLAn;p :
. ~
05
: - 1~ . . .
< z
iBcRl~
D~A
.
. , Y
. F ~ , . , _ ~
- . .
.
.
: -
.
: ~
1 r H~~
. - . :
'.~i:.•.•.• _ . . - :
.
. c~ e ? =Vl ~
-
~ ~
, . . ~ ~ ~
W
► - `i J ~ . : euCxtr_
~ rra
• ~ ACK ON A10NTG.1r-p".'.
('ARi>'-r z a ► 08 0 .
Q~ Z V W T~".."?M: aY W
Y-l E1.D C~ N F ~ U t N ~:1= ~
~ -2
a
" KNOX
~z ±_i-~ `J I N 14NA I .
~ ~
_J INc7 A• ~ u+ ~
, r
11
:i cnI Qi 290 LU
` N RA vU u^ I N F
~ ~ A
~
Cj ~ A
ui ~ I , I I ►At;WN u.~
'
I < C ax~EU.
~ ~
{ l~
:E K -E ~ LNT T m ~
~ ~ q " I
~ C ' ~ O
~ a S ~ ~ a eacNc
C 00 E
11 ~
~ES?j "7
c Y CAtAI n(1 . °T
4 ri caT C A N I '
D~
~ o ~
a I ~ I ~jI . ~ ~ ~ c`n' (
~ aRnanwa - L
N m A~ I I ~
U
Z
r-,'WAY ~ z VAt ! -Y'+,':.Y
iX
h ~JIXC!~
j= C•a ~
t1r~,~ ` SP~ ' ~,4AiN ~
' ~
s)
~rerl
w
Q t
v'
~TM
~ ~ kra D+'~~MAN dr`' q V2
ra Tf+ Hlu S. Fa+"~i ~ ~ ; u
I I ~ra - Q C1.1IP • 77-1 2 0"' -~--k 7n-
( I ~ 4t r►~ ~ KaRO. K
n r~.~ I ~ ~ I I I ;H I~ 9 rr
. n ~ ~ ~ ~ • 11 N~,,,~7 c3 ~ 1 S ~ ri
127
~
I w7}-+ I ' . w~ 14 4•4
r' S T,►
~ , • ~ - - • - • . . . . . _ . . . . . . . .
Not to Scale N ~
L-
~
r 9
.
.
.
~
~ ~~t5~-,~~ , ~ ~
• ~ ~ ~ ~
•~1
, ~ J 1 t • ~ ~'`P
so
G
SPOK.ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERNG
1026 W Broadway, Spokane tiVA 99260 (509) 477 3600
I
Land lise File m C 0 APPLICAiNT'S iNAN1E M . ~e-
BLDG m
~
OT'HER m NL4ILLN G ADDRESS F,,
S 07 T ZS R
P.~RC'E L r y 5072 Z~ I ~ PHO~TE - r 1 M Z- GI Lo 7 I
ROAD NA-\,1E PHOti-E - #2
The followinu docurlents are needed before the Spokane Countv Engineer's Depa1-rrnnent can
processin~z Votir larld i!se apnlic,ltion as approve<<. ~
=If3-P:-1Y FE--~~--~~ve-
l~ RECORD F DEED with Auditors Stam
ED COPY O ( p), DEED OF TRUST, contract or
conveyinQ instrt.rTlent. These m~~~,~ be obtained from the Cotint~,~ ,=~udii~~r. ?nd iloor c,i- r.},;c
Courthouse.
LEGAII. DESCRIPTION (dztailed and coilipietz) ot your acczss c:isement.
A LISTING OF NAIVIES of individuals who will be 51g711I1g, thz documents. These
individual names should appear as the person(s) legally sign their name.
,
~CG. )ICA Nti -'1,-
. . ~ ~ I1~., A CURRENT ASSESSOR'S MAP whlch depicts the location of the property.
.~`1.
r
+ Otii~~\jERSHIP NIICRO-RUN. These may be obtained from the Countv Assessors, 1 s~
floor, of the Courthouse. ~ RECORD OF SURVEY or le~al descnptions of parcels
The necessary documents will be prepared by the Encyineer's Department, Right-of-way Section, upon
provision of the information noted above. You will be notified when the documents are ready for
siQnature. The documents may be sent to you, hotivever, IT SHOULU BE NOTED THAT ALL
SIGNATURES INItiST BE NOTARIZED. The Enjineer's Department does have notaries available if
yoii choose to sign the documents at our office.
Plzase call when ready Pleas e m~iil v.c ;I ci%
Notice to Public Right-of=way
,
COVfMENTS C^,< <GNS Q G,_ ~ rG N~T~; ~ ~ -}--rL
e c C
► ,
Riaht-of-~va,,• .agent Fonvard to you from C,~`P
k~t',,,,ti~:LTP
r J
. . . Proj- ,.er: 99009827 . 1` . . . , . . . ' . . . . . ' .i. . '-4f! vfr~~~~•~.~
'ect nv: Applic 1 '`atlor~ Date: 12/10/19 Fage 1 of 1
Numb
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT `
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
, r . . :
Project In oryna#ipn: . . : . _
. Pernvt Use: preconference - home industry Contact: HOVVELL ETAL, MIItE B& S
- , . . . Address: 8124 E UTAH AVE
Setbacks: Front Left: Right: ' Rear: C- S- Z SPOKANE, VVA 99212-2129
. ' - . . Phone: (509) 928-7293
Site I,zfprmqtipft:
.
Plat Key: 001874 Name: ORCHARD AVENUE ADD SUB.B District: E ,
Parcel Number: 45072.2111 SiteAddress: 8124 E UTAH AVE • Owner: Name: HOVVELL ETAL, MIKE B& ST
Spokane, WA USA 00000 Address: 8124 E UTAH AVE '
Location:: SPO SPOKANE, WA 99212-2129
Zoning: AGSUB - ~
' Water District: . Hold: ❑
Area: 13,875 Sq Ft Width: 0 Depth: 100 Right Of Way (ft): 50
Nbr of Bldgs: 1 Nbr of Dwellings: 1
PqYiefv InfigXlliRliott: Porn: if s_
- Conditional Use
~-Contractor. . Firm:
. Address: . Phone: '
Item DeS" tion . Units Unit Desc Fee Amount ,
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1 SELECT $75.00
ENGINEER REVIEW 1 SELECT $50.00
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1 SELECT $412.00
PRE-APP CONFERENCE - 1. SELECI' $36.00
Permit Total Fees: $573.00
Palperit ►51nj1maJy: ~ .
Operator: RW Printed By: GMW Print Date: 12/10/1999
Permit Type Fee Amount Invoice Amount Amounj Paid Amount Owing
Conditional Use $573.00 $573.00 $573.00 $0.00
$573.00 $573.00 $573.00 $0.00
Notes: - • _
~ • • .
~
Spokane County
Public Works Departrnent
Divison of Building & Planning
Receipt
Receipt 1Vun:ber: 10828 Customer Number
Proiects
Full
Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt Owin~ PAID P»:t
99009827 1 $573.00 $573.00 $573.00 $573.00 V ~
Total: $573.00 $573.00 $573.00 $573.00
Miscellaneous Items
Total PAID: $573.00
Tender
~e C/ieck Acct BalQnce CC Nbr Exp Date TENDERED
Cash 573.00
Tota1 TENDERED: 573.00
Over / (Sliort) $0.00
Cliange $0.00
Notes:
Trart Date / Titi:e: 12/10/1999 11:19:19 A
By: GWendei
Logo,: User: gwendel
Sratiotr: GWENDEL
4verrirle By:
Printed: 12/10/1999 11:19:45 AN! P°ge 1°f 1
452390.
T11(2000 o 03;05P ~~I~ ~~~t ~1~ nn ~f1!1~(at10 ~.f1 w~
After Recording IZeturn To: Spokane County Engiiicer
Attn.: Right of Way,Department.
llocur»eM Title: Notice to the I'ublic No. b
Grantor(s): MIKE B. & STACEY R.
Grantee(s): Government, County of Spokanc°
Legal Description: PTN. oF TRAczl 2 . J
,
Additional Legal Description: See Page 2
Assessor's Tax Parccl Numheff§)-
. Reference Number
Log In Date: 1., ~ I.. - U ~ ►:~:yu~a~~u uy : u::~:,~ L iCPo1C,1 u): :
' Purpose: CU- 15-99 RF No(4.: 524 Road Naiiic(X): UTAIi AVENUE
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF CNG[NEERING
Spokane County, Washington
A0010
NO. 6
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
4THE MA"I'TEIZ OF RID Wf1IVER, AGREEMENZ' nND CUVENANT: KNOW ALL MEN
13Y THESE PRESENTS, That P1IKE B. HOWELL & STACEY R. HOWELL, lltishand and wife;
',(3D ADALBERT M. HOERNER & DIANNE G. HOERNER, husband and wife,
being the owners of the following described lands in consideration of Mutual Benefits ilow or to
be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successors in interest
liereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the below described property in a Road
Icnprovement District (RID) and to suppvrt the formation of a Road Improvement District for
improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to
place their name on a petition for formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW
36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane Couiity to cast their ballot in favor of a RID
being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, anci/or by not filing a
protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution methocl
provided for irl RCW 36.88.065 and Cllapter 35.43 RCVV.
If aIl IZID iS prupuseci for llllpi'OVE:I11C111 Uf 1}lt', ruad(s) deseribc.'ci bCIUw, Sal(j O"`Ilel"S a11d
sziccessors further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RID are feasible, and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID
by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceed
tlie cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RI I)
is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successors shail
retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on t}lc
property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the fornlation of a RID by
either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the superioi-
court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll;
provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so~
long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value the improvement(s)
add(s) to the property.
1t is fiirther acknowiedged and agreeci that at sucli 11I11e as a R1L) is createci or ally, county roaci
improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at tlic
sole expense of the owners of property within the RID or served by the improvements witholit
any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver containcd in this agreemeiit
shal) e\nire after ten (10) ~,~e;irs i~~-oi>> the tl,,tc ol~c-.\e:- titWIl
4523903
Pae: 2of2
r,~ Fh~„ 14~11120~ 03;05P
ar.a 4n nn CnnkAna rn we
'Hhe above co«clitiviis and covenant apply to the iollowilig described property:
ASSIJSSURS PAIZCEL NO(~~: 45072.2111
Tnat ~)(-)L-tiOr1 CUf TraC~ ~,'3:1 or t1t(' REPLAT 0I' I~LC>('_::= 151, 1`: 3, 178, 179, and 225, ORCHARD AVENUE ADDITION as pez' Plat
in Volume "N" of PLats, Page 26, described as fo>.lows :
THE EAST 150.00 FEET OF SAID TRACT 2-3)1.
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 108.00 FEET THEREOF.
SITiJATE IN THE COUNTY OF SPOKANF, STA'1'E C)F V1ASItItK:`i'01I.
; iis Agreeiilelit apPlic;s to tile iiiipruveiiiciit oi
I'No. 524 by grading, draining, surfacing, ctirbirig, pavii~g, siclc~v~ll~ Cl)I1StCllCli~~Il II1CIl1C~ll1~?
traf- tic cmltrol [cicilities atlci relatcci work.
I 11eSe I'eC~UII'eIIleI1tS aI'e aI1C~ SI~iZlI I'Ull ~k'itjl tilt; 1~111(.j ~lIiC~ sI1~~1l ~?i' 1)111Cj1I1g U~)C)Jl 1~]t~ O~~'I1~I'S, t~lt'lT
I161-s. -tjcccss~~rs ~~r ~~ssi~?Tis.
IN WI I N fD~~
WHEI~OF, wE liave herel!tito~ tict "~i~ii ll,;S
~.SS
dw,
:
B
I3~_ y~
*AALBER~' B. HOWELL ST EY R. HOWEI_ : y ; BY`: NL..-.vJQ lM. HOERNER DIANNE G. I-RNER
S"I'ATE OF WASHINGTON )
COLTNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss
I certify t}lat I know or have satisfactory evidence that MIxE R. & STACEY xoWELL AI1D
AI)ALi3EYT CI DIA~IP!E G. I-IGERNER,
(i;s/are) the individual(s) who appeared before me, and said individual(s) acknowledged that
}WEbt/they signed this instrument, and acknowledged it as hisftetlleir free and voluntary act,
fOI' thC llSeS ~lnCj pL1I'poSeS Illt',IlIioI1ed lll thC IIiSfI'L11Ilt'.Ilt.
Uated this dav of' 0 C-'TOLH E P
OFfICIAI SEA+L •
RAYMOND T. MOON NOTARY PU LIC
NOTARY PU6LIC-STATE OF WASMINGTON
C4UNTY OF SPOIfANE In and for the State of Washington,
My Commission Expires 1tme 21, 2001 residing at Spokane.
My apll()liltllleilt C_\l11I't'.S 6P rwfortnsinoticc to public C rcg notary\bc
~