VE-2-94
. • ♦
ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
MAR 1 8 1994
IN THE MATTER OF A VARIANCE FROM )
MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK ) FIND~~~~~~
REQUIREMENT ) CONCLUSIONS,
A WA L . a~~~_n2- ~4 ) AND DECISION
APPLICANT: HENRY HASSE )
COMPANION FILE(S): NONE )
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to build a porch with a
setback of 46 feet from the center line of N. Vista Road right of way; whereas secdon
14.616.325.A.1. of the Zoning Code of Spokane County requires a minimum of 55 feet from
the center line of the roadway right of way. Authority to consider such a request exists
pursuant to section 14.444.080 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County and Spokane County
Board of County Commissioners resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended.
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located in the Spokane Valley on the southwest corner
of Vista Road and Cataldo Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Secrion 18, Township 25N, Range
44EWM; 917 N. Vista Road. Parcel Number: 45182.0904 OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE
PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available information
on file, one or more site visits, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of
the public hearing held on March 9, 1994, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on
March 17, 1994 to APPRO'VE the application as set forth in the file documents and as
condirioned below.
,
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Testimony was taken under oath.
2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file. A
special consideration in this project has to do with the existing, constructed, older dwelling unit
located on the parcel. The dwelling unit was, and is still, in dire need of a new roof. The
contractor engaged to do the roof work, proceeded to do so by removing the entire porch on
the Vista Road side of the building. The roof was simply supported by several posts and
covered an entry 'stoop' to the front door, several steps leading up the 'stoop', and a small
concrete patio connecting the 'stoop' to the driveway. Upon inquiring of the County about
rebuilding the porch, the contractor learned that the removal of the porch necessitated a new
building permit, which in turn would have the porch roof conform with the setback.
Complying with the present setback standard of 55 feet from the centerline of the road would
not allow the porch to be built as it previously existed. The applicant seeks relief from the
standard in order to rebuild the porch roof as it existed prior to its removal.
3. In compliance with RCW 36.70.450, the Planning Department determined that this
proposal is generally consistent, as condirioned, with the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. -
✓
CASE NO. VE-02-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2
4. The site is zoned Urban Residentia13.5 (tJR-3.5), which allows the proposed use
upon approval of this application.
5. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal are residenrial, all of which are
compatible with the proposal. Many of the setbacks from Vista Road in the area appeared,
upon observation during a field trip, to be the same or similar to the setback requested by the
applicant.
6. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b).
7. The reasons for granting the variance, as set forth by the applicant, are as follows.
The applicant states that, except for the unauthorized removal of the porch roof by the
contractor, he would not be in this predicament. He also states that without the porch roof
overhanging the front 'stoop' area by at least 1 1/2 to 2 feet, rain and melting snow drips onto
the porch. The water and ice then drain toward the dwelling unit and infiltrate the house;
resulting in water in the living room. Without the porch being added back on, his house will
suffer a substanrial decline in usefulness, safety and value. His maintenance costs would .
increase in order to keep recovering from water damage.
8. While not specifically relating to the land itself, the special circumstance does relate
to the property as it encompasses the building. There is no administrative process to handle the
oversight of the contractor in removing the porch roof and then not being able to rebuild it as it
was before, except to use the variance process.
9. No adverse testimony or written comments were received regard.ing the proposal.
10. The applicant is hereby advised that Vista Road is a collector arterial in the Courity's
Arterial Road Plan. As such, it is likely to be widened to as much as a 70 foot right of way.
Based on req,uiring an equal amount of right of way from each side of the street, that would
require an addirional 15 feet of right of way to be acquired from the front yard of the subject
property. The Arterial Road Plan then calls for setbacks to be 25 feet from that. Such a 25
foot setback would intrude into the main portion of the house. The applicant is simply advised
of this future likelihood, the prospects of future land acquisition, and the requu-ements that
future setbacks may have on this property.
11. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various County
agencies reviewing this project.
12. Various performance standards and criteria are additionally needed to make the use
compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against
imposing excessive demands upon public utiliries, and these shall be addressed as condirions
of approval.
13. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning
Adjustor of Spokane County have been met
HD/VE-2-94 Decision
I
CASE NO. VE-02-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES
the proposal as generally set forth in the file documents, subject to compliance with the
following
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. GENERAL
1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in
interest and shall run with the land as long as the present dwelling unit exists on the site. See
file for photographs.
2. Failure to comply with any of the conditions of approval contained in this decision,
except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zoning
Code for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropriate.
3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or
the conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zoning Adjustor to be within the context of
the original decision.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The variance is approved to a distance of approximately 46 feet from the center line
of right of way. This equates to 26 feet from the front property line. Laclang a definitive
measurement from either of these two reference points, the approved concept is to allow a roof
overhang of approximately 1 1/2 to 2 feet east of the east edge of the raised front porch 'stoop,'
which is also approximately equivalent to the easterly edge of the wood screen erected on the
north side of the raised front porch 'stoop.' The roof may be supported by numerous posts
established 1 1/2 to 2 feet west of the edge of the intended roof.
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
1. T'he applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage
of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as
authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Fire
Apparatus Access Roads; Fire Hydrant/Flow; Approved Water Systems: Building
Accessibility; Construction Type; Occupancy Classification; Exiting; Exterior Wall Protection;
and Energy Code Regulations.
2. The construction plans shall be approved by the Zoning Adjustor.
HD/VE-2-94 Decision
y .
CASE NO. VE-02-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4
IV. DIVISION OF UTILITIES
None is needed.
V. HEALTH DISTRICT
None is needed.
VI. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
None is needed.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDIfiIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH
NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIQR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE .
RtLEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY A.PPEAL PERIOD.
HOWEVER, TBE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND
1NCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS
OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL.
DATED this 17th day of March, 1994. `
THOMAS . SHER,AICP Zon' stor
Spokane Co Washington
FILED:
1) Applicant (Certified/Return Receipt Mai.l)
2) Opponents of Record
3) Spokane Division of Engineering and Roads
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Division of Utilities
6) Spokane County Department of Buildings
7) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic Fi1e
NOTE: ONLY TI-E APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN
A.PPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) GAI.ENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING.
APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$200.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT
1'BE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING,
1026 W. BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Section 14.412.042 of the Zoning Code for
Spokane County).
HD/VE-2-94 IIecision
. 'ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# WRelated File # ( )
Date to Review 3;-?, -~4 $Time 9:45 # Z
. 3
Date to AA & DR Time Date Reccived 2-10-94
Project Name MIN FR YD SETBACK-PORCH ADD 46' (CODr 55) No. Lots - 1 No.Acres 8,1.SF
Section - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS W VISTA/S CATALCO PARCEL # 18542-0904
Applicant's Name HENRY IIASSLL Phone # 926-6856
Address 917 N VISTA-SPOKANE WA 99212 Work #
Date Conditions mai]ed
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZONE d NO W S SCHOOL
Enginecr / Surveyor's / Architect's Name
Planning Contact l'erson Phone # 456-2205
Date SubmiUed Description Initials
AGREEM]-?NT TO PAY rEES OR PRIn1tIr1'Y FEE CUMPLL'lED & COYY TO ACCOUNI'ING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COl'Y TO ACCOUNT'ING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLE't'F.D - OR NLEDS TO BE SIGNEll
DESIGN DEVIAT70N SUI3MII'rED
ALTEItATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & I.OTS
HEARING HXAM _APPROVFia _DF,N[ED-_APPCALED BBC / PROJI;C'1' _AI'1'ROVEp _DEN1ED
~
k\p\1\review.tor
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
-VARIANCE REQUIREMENTS-
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Zoning Adjustor
FROM: Division Of Engineering & Roads Sc~Tu-.
DATE: March 1, 1994
SUBJECT: VARIANCE #VE-02-94 ~ HASSEE* HENERY
The Spokane County Enqineerinq Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The followinq comments are offered for inclusion in the
Findinqs and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be
approved.
E64 We have reviewed the above referenced proposal and have no comments
to make concerning the application.
,
~
. .
• ,
. ,
~
S P O K A N F C O U1-T T Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR
RT07TII(CIE DIF SIPOKAYIE cCCUfqrTY 7LGlYIIMG AIIDdTUOrTOllk 1PUB]LIIC
1HI IE A IRII IqG
DATE: March 9, 1994
TIME: 9:45 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE: Spokane County Public Works Building
Commissioners Assembly Room
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM Z File: VE-02-94
VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK STANDARDS
LOCATION: Generally located in the Spokane Valley on the southwest corner of Vista
Road and Cataldo Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Section 18, Township 25N, Range 44EWM;
917 N. Vista Road. •
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to build a porch with a setback of 46 feet from the
center line of N. Vista Road right of way; whereas section 14.616.325.A.1. of the Zoning
Code of Spokane County requires a mini.mum of 55 feet from the center line of the
roadway right of way.
EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5)
SITE SIZE: Approximately 8,190 square feet
APPLICANT: Henry Hasse
917 N. Vista Road
Spokane WA 99212
All meetings and hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to disabled
individuals. For more particular information, please contact the Spokane County Planning
Department at (509) 456-2205.
NOTE: THE ZONING ADNSTOR WILL ISSUE A W:EtITTEN DECISION TO APPROVE OR DENY
THE ABOVE PROPOSAL. ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY
APPEAL THE ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION AND MUST DO SO WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR
DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE DECISION'S SIGNING. APPEALS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A$210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SPOKANE
COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING, 1026 WEST BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260
(SECTION 14.412.042 OF THE ZONING CODE OF SPOKANE COUNTY). THE ABOVE
REFERENCED FILE MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE PLANIVING DEPARTMENT.
WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205
.
` , ' • ' ' .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIING DEPARTMENT
. APPLICATXnNS B:EFnRE 7'HE 7,C;NYNGY AD.IUSTni2
Name of Applicant: /414 .SSAgent: Y N
~ Street Address: q 1~/llor +k
Zip Phone - Home: C/ Z./ L
City: State:~0f}_S q. Code: '7 9 ~ l-L-- Work: Agent's No.:
Name of Property Owner(s): H -0- h r17~4..~ .5~--
, ,
Street Address: CT Yl
~ I~C . ~ . ~ ~~P Phcne - Home:
- City:, , A h State. Code: 1 Z Work:
REQtTESTED ACMON(S) (Circle appropriate action): (Vaiiance(s)) Conditional Use Pez-m.it Expansion of a -
Uther: Nonconforming Use
FOR STAk'F USE ONLX • . . .
Violation/
. Section If Township Range~ Enforcement: Y 1\1
•Lot and legal checked by: •CWSA sewer purveyor:
•CWSSA water purveyor: ~~~kt~"t Un •CUP standards met: Y N"NA~
' •Existing . m a ..~.r~. ~•9
zone: Cite applicable sec;t~~~~ lV_',!r'~,-
a~ta.,.,.•..,...,n ~ •Comp. Plan designation: tpt•~~-C(~Vl. •Arterial Road Plan desig4nation: IJ 7o !
,
•Fire TJistrict t f t . W •Person doing preapp conf.: 4~U / MO,Q~
•Oth`r/p evious Planning Dep ment actions inv lving this property: ( Z s' ~
~ti(~~t~•(,1~1, ~ ~pD.I ?~ta0,
L)
•Certificate of Exemption No.: ' Application No.: 1f~, -,2. - c/~ s¢~
. - ~
Heanng Date: ~D+ ,Site plan dimensioning checked by: ~
- ~
ABOUT THE PROPERTY (b applic nt)
- •E~cisting use of property: , ~
•Describe,pro osed 4.se of ;he property, noCing change fr9m 'existing use':
Nd •If a variance application, state t~e Code standaxdescribe the variance sought in romparable
te s(i.e.; 50 feet from centerline erses requ. red 65 feet):
9-f Z--c/k-~ ~~--Q.-e~
~ v v
. .
•Zf a conditional use permit application, does propo %1 meet all standards? Y~
Zf not, has one oz more variances been requesced? Y' r) ' ~sr9o~
•What is the size of the subject ProPertY. t0.5 1,1 l
. ~
A •Street address of property (if known): "
: •Leg al de~n'ptionof pr~y (in^ lUde easement, if applicable):
r~
. ,
•Parcel No(s).: f
•Source of legal: i~ Y~ 1
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner sponsor andlor agent: •What interest do you (ap kcant) ho~s,~ ~i the property?
0
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S
COUNTY OF SPOKANE }
I SWFAR, UN17ER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
_ AUTHORLZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED aITE; (2) IF NOT THEE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISS10N
FROM OWNER AUiIIORLZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHA,LF IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF
THE ABOVE RESP4NSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY ANID ' TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. .
Signed: ~ Date
- ' - - / i
' , ~ . . • . •
. • ' ~ r . ~t ~
. . ~ 1~ ~ ~ . .
otary ublic in and for the state of <hington, residin at
- ' . : ' ,r• • 1v:aPAo;ntment expires: !1
f - pagc 1 of 2
7~A; AP? kiV. 10/93
'a .
a, . , , ' • • • r: i•, ' „ ` , • ,
r ;r r f'~~ \ : . : •`\J• , r^ ^r C i/'a
PROOF forTn(s) (bY aPPlicant)
~ ' .
t rs r~ec;E,.~sa.~~ fcr- 7'i~". aPPlicant or his/her rePresentative to establish °~he reasons whY the
. '
1 YU; :~i.~D::~CT:CN should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor
' . 'P~ne.avl:lication. A_ccordingly, you should have been given a form tor your requested
use, etc.} designed to help you presert your case in a way which
. t'., . .
ao;;which the Zoning Adjustor musL consider. Please fill the form ouc and return
, it.a~plication.
B. SXGN-OFF B'' COUNTX DEPARTMENTS A.ND OTHER A.GENCZES
, (applicant mlisf visit each agency whose no. is circIe Io}
. . I~
SPOKANE COUNTY HEr~LTH DZS RZ T
r~. c~ . yProposed method of water supply:
. h)' Proposed.method of se~v?be c.i.sFosa?: ',y ~ .
A prelim,inary consultatiorl has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informeci
of requirements and standards. We r e~ ns It~1C1011 W1Lh PI'clntlllig Ueparlmeni N
.r1~.`. . . .
' (Signature) - / (Date) (Sigii-off Waived)
2.. SPOKANE COtJNTY PUBLIC VvO~ZKS DEPAR'TMENT .
. . . (Engin ring oads Division) .
, 'A prelirninary ons It ' n as been held to d~ uss the proposal. T~le applicant has been infomied
of requirem s ds. We reque consultation with Planning ]~eparnnent Y N
- ~ ~ J 14AJ4*61
' (Signature) U (Date) , '(Sign-off Waived)
3. SPOKA.NE COUNTX UTZI,XTZES DEPARTMENT- (P1aiIning Department may waive
; if outside WWMA)
A preiiminary consultation has been held to discuss the pro . T applicant has been infornned .
. ~ of requuemen an standards. ~
(Sig^atw:r:; . (r~aLe j (Sign-of'r Waived by Planning?)
. [ J The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with ll-la to become informed of water svstem ' ~ . requirements and standards. (See #a below) ✓
[ J The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
co become informcd oC sewage disposai
requirements and standards. (See #b below)
a. VVATER PURVEYOR: ~ .~l/l.Q, W I~ ~ J~
1} The proposal is/is not locate within the boundar}, of our future service area.
2) The proposal is,/is not located within the bound.ary of our cuzTent district.
3) We are/are not able to serve this site with adequate water. 4) Satisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to serve this proposal.
(S ignature) (Date)
. SE'PVERAGE PUR~EYOR: A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been
. informed of requireme t stan .
. ~ _ ; .
. ; . . (Sig~?ature) (Date) pagc 2 oE 2
: ZA; APP REv; 10/93 , . t . •
~ r .
VARIA,.NCE BURDEN OF PROOF FORM
Nam.e:
File Number:
A"variance" is the means by which an adjustment is made in the application of the specific
regularions of the.zoning classification for a particular (the subject) piece of property. This
property, because of special circum.stances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the viciniry and in a similar zone classification. This adjustment
remedies the difference in privileges. A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in
the zone classification i.n which the property is located.
The following questions wi.ll help to determine the outcome of your request Your request re:~,:urLs
accurate and complete responses. First circle either the "yes" or the "no" answer(s) foJlowing the
questions below as they apply to your situation and then explain as needed (in the space provided)
to make your unique situation clear. Certain phxases from the Zoning Code of Spokane County
secdon on variances are included in these questions and are undezlined for convenience.
A. Will this variance pe~ut a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? '.'es ~ No
Explain: ~11L- c ` ' ---1
~~L[.. n t ~ /~[~~i'-Grl./l, l.C~-~'.'~'y~ : 3~ ~G L~--~- . 1 ~~"~2'~.
V
v
v
B. Are there sFecial circumstancea (lot size, shape, topography, location, access,
surroundings, etc.) which apply to the subject property and which may not
apply to other properties in the _)jcinit,y? Y e s i~to
Explain:
i
C. Zs the subject property dg,nrived of rivih,,ees commoDly eniove ~y othe~r
nronertiea u1 the vicinitv and in a sim-ilar 7x)ne classification? Ye Nro
Explain:~A_.e_ C1o,
, " " ~C; Lr~~tr. _ • ~
D. Will thi.s variance be harmfzul to the public welfare or to other properties in
the vici.nity_ and a5i.milax zone cl~si.fic&aon? Xes No
. /
Explain: LL/ ~~ne1r~-~.i~ l ~"'7A ~c~C. . ,r~ ~ , ~ Q~. iJ~-~~~ /~_$'I~ :
~
,
E. A.re there other similar situ ti s in the yicinity in a similar zone cla.uificqtion? Yes
Are they permitted uses? ~es) No Are they "nonconforming" usel? Yes No
~
C'.L,,t~~- ~.u.~ -•-v,~-r~.., ~-"i1<-.a•-.-..~ .~-L- -'lu.- r .
v
F. Could the subject property be put to a reascnable and nermitted use b_y you or another
person without the requested variance? Yes
Expla.in: ~~~-(2- v- v-z-~~-- oz,-~
v <
G. Lf this request is granted, will the subject properry be more environmentally
sensitive, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic property? Yes No
Explain:
Page 1 of 2
H. If this variance is granted, will the broader public need or interest be served? Oe No
Explain:
V v .
1. Wiil this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies to the
subject'property? Yes ~
X,
Explain: Y~-z
.
J. Will approval of th:, variancc grant to the subject property the privileges of a different ~aK
classification (in other words would this be a"de facto" zone change)? Yes (No
Explain:
K. WiU this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
,
Explain: -U-,
; ~ ~ 1 tl
L. Is this variance requized for a reasonable economic return from the subject ~N'
property or is the existing structure too small? Ye EXP131I1: ~L ti G~C'~'i?Cc3t'tii'C.,• ~',t~~-!~(c~•.~
,~~j , ~ l .
M. Did the Dra,crical dzfficultv whicri caused you to apply for this variance exist
before you owned the subiect A.roperty? (Yes No
Explain. '1r, ~-tv"~ / l~ ~ '~C..~ ~~,1-7y--~Z~1,-••~ .~2-~^C . ~'~L~C=c~f`/` ,!'uZ~ ~ CJ ~
v ~
V
N. If approved, woul.d this variance affect land use density regulations which exist
to protect the Rathdnlm/Spokane Aquifer? Yes No
Explain:
The following space is foz further explanation. Attach an add.itional page(s) i.f needed.
You are invited to present additional photographs, rliagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of this
application. We have the equipment to clisplay video tapes. No such addirional material is required
and in any case it must be BRYEF and descriptive of issues whuch need to be considered in relation
to this requested variance. If you have questions about the pzocedure to be followed feel free to
contact the Spokane County Planning Department at 456-2205.
xP-vnxukrrcE; suxDErr oF pxoor FoxM Page 2 of 2
REv; s/92
~ _ _ _ ' • f . ' ~ • Yt~ ~ '
. . ' ~ • . . • . ~ ~ - ~ - ~ . . ~ ~ . -
~ - . . - . . , ,
T . , , , . ~ . , ~ . . , . ~ - , , ' ' w . . " ' .
• . ~~K" ~ ' ~ . 1 • . ~
J + . . ~ • ' + r ' ~ f ~ • ~ . • , • • ~ ~ . . . ` ~ /t~+~~dr~e~~~k~~/`~ , , ' .
, , - . . • ' , • . . . • ~ . ;r . ~ .
, ' • ' . : v ~ ' • ' . . . : . . : . ' . ' - " - .
. ~ ~ . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING -DEPARTMENT
A,PPLICATInN$ BEFnR,E THE ZON~NG AU.TUSTnR
Name of APPlicant: -SS - Agent: Y N
. ~ . . . .
Street Address: ~ /lfor v~..~"~
. . - . ~ ~ Zip : Phone - Home: ? ~ .
City: State:~N. Code: 99 ~ I Z-- - - Work: .
- Agent's No.:
Name of Property Owner(s): `q 7Vi~-~
Street Address: /y~
Zi -Phone. Home:[~~//
~ ~ ~ Hw''~' • 2~~ ` ' ^7 i'YI
City:., ~ PD k S tte:
' • ' ' '},Y~'°~.' y',p~'~ y ~n" . 4 C'1~~"' . . ' . ,z .,~,p~~ FrV"•~l~",4,s~i~l.•~5!~(., 1,_.i'
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appr pr~ate a tion):
, , . . ~ ~ . , . . .
- (Conditional Use Perrriit ' Expansion.of -a
- Uther. - - - . . . - . , ~ . . : . Nonconfornung Use
~ FOR*STAFF USE ONLY
~ - - - ' ~ - ~ ~ t - ~ . , ~ : • ~ Violation/
Secdon Tawnship Range ,,Enforcement: , Y
•Lot and legal checked bY•. •CWSA:sewer P. urveY:or: ~ - ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ , . . , ~
•CWSSA.water purveyor: •CUP standards met: Y N NA
~ ,•Existing zone: ~Cite"applicable-"section:
•Comp. Plan designation: - ~ •Arterial Road Plan'designation:
~ •Fire District: ~-Person doing pr.eapp ~conf.•
~ •Other/previous Planrving. Department actions irivolving this property:
~ ' . . • : Y ~ ^ i:t+ + • ~ _
' - • _ ' - = . - ' - ' _ . . r , ~ , ~ •~f~'(~.~ ` i.;~ i;
. ~ ~ , ' ~ , _
•Certificate of Exemprion No.: Application No.:
•Hearing Date: •Site plan dimensioning checked~6y:
. - _ : ' = ; ~ k:,x~~: - • a" . . - -'~.i~~~c~ ~.t. j-z ,
~ ' •r J'~~+•'' ~ ",JT+f'y~.~„i
r I .+~%i• • z 001004.
•
ABOUT THE PROPERTY ~(b a`pplic ~t)~ - ' ~ ` - ; - • ~ . . ~ . ~ ; : ~ ~ . - ~ , , , - - '
Existing use of property:
-Describe,pro osed qse of the property, noting change fr9m 'existing use':
. •Lf a variance. application, state tKe Code_standard, ~id describe theavariance sought-in comparable ' . .
~
~ te s (i.e.; 50 feet from centerline verses req ' 'red~ 65eet):. - : ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ • • ~ ~ ~ - , : _ ~
v v'_
•If a conditional use permit-applic6tion,'does propo 1 meet" alI, standards? '.Y
If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y
•What is the size of the*subject prorty. JO.5
•Street address of property (if known):
•Legal d~ cri tion of pr erty (in ~ lude easement,. if .applicable):
•Parcel No(s).:
•Source of legal: ~
•Total amount of adjoining_land controlled-by -this owner' sponsor and/or agent: ~ • - . ~ , ; : ~
•What interest do you (ap 'cant) ho the property?;
~
U ~ . . .
TATE OF WASHINGTON
S
. . '~S , ~ . . . , . _ [ . ,.f i
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT:- (1) 'TAM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR ~ . ~ . ' ~ ' ~
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; -(2)~ TF ~NQT~THE OWNER, WRITI'EN. PERMIS.SION - ~
FROM-OWNER AUTIlORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BfiHALF, IS'ATTACHED; AND'(3) ALL OF
THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND I,
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWI,EDGE. _ - ' , : . - ' _ . - ~ , - ~ ~ ~ r, •
~ Signed: -Date - A ~ ~ • : ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ~ ,
• . ~ . . ' . ' ~ . ~ - ' ~ ' , . ~ r . ~ •t' ~ . ~k7~` ~~~'~~'~yi , . ' .
. • _ _ ' - . . ~ ° _ . :y~zx'.
Notary~Public;-in-andrfor trie:state of `?Vashington; residing at'
' - - ~ ~s _ . , - -t - ~ ~ _ . _ • :-7~;`~1"~~'e'•' .
aPPointment expi`res: ~ ~ - • ~ ~ ~ .
-.page.l of2-
ZA, • APP REV. 10/93 ~ . . . _'r",' ` = • ~ - . . ~ - : • , A ~ ~ ; . . ~ `~;~l, . - J ,
~ - _ . . , . • • ~ r ~ . , ~ ` • ' • , _ ~ _ ~ ' ' v ? -
~
RECEIPT SUMMARY
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9400049 DATE: 01/11/94
APPLICANT: HENRY HASSE PHONE= 509 926 6856
ADDRESS: 917 N VISTA
SPOKANE WA 99212
CONTACT NAME: HENRY HASSE PHONE= 509 926 6856
TRANSACTION: VARIANCE APPLICATION - ENGTNEER'S
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
VARIANCE 1 50.00
TOTAL DUE = 50.00
TOTAL L'AI D= 50.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
. 01/11/94 00000339 CASH 50.00
G
. PROCESSED BY: CAROL BRADBURN
PRINTED BY: CAROL BRADBURN
THANK YOU
,w
e ~ VEm2=94
r
ui:"~ 11. • ~
~ „ x n,vx
L
r ~ z
41
kCHiELL? ,
.
I NI A mA AYE. ! Di
~ - ..F
~ aa~c...w ~ •
x Lo ww 4.
L
0
,
i4OFtA AN/E.
MOFM
~ ~ UG 57A V ~ . .
a`
i ~
~
~ • ~ A • Y
F LQ.
A
l~ • ~
~ h 1 1 1
~ ~C 1- • WVfCLL •
• - i
~ • ~ . _ ~
.
Ik , .
~ SHARP - • ~ .
ld r * ~
,.,•.=ds':~ ~r
` . ~ T s
'g~ ' ' • ~ ~
1 C.ArALDO rA4 AV ~
~
~ '•.:ti;'~' - - ON" ~
, - . .
a o y
a
2 10
. F ~ •
• ~7~/ ~
F7 E y ~ '
_ - ~
~ AL-K1 ALK I
- - • ~ - ~
LTErt2MR• ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ,t-I k G N ~
ul - sc i,. lr
rP;jo
.~4%
E ~A r~ R~ N ` ~r~~~ ~ ~•f ~ ~ ~ ~ ;
~ ~ gA,,;rr7$1
~ ~ ~ • '~41* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3
t
~ ~.4 ~ £,•:sE'~~ 4r r IQ~ tf
0
. . ~ ~
~ ttiJc' ~~1
2A
~ -7 2 4L, !9~? ~ - 12 ~ c~0 • zoui
IL
P'i
p
FIRST
ikm
T r+ r igt r,
R y
` .
~ . 4
_ cr
~ ~
~~'r . ,
. ~ I~t- I
_
- ~ -
~ ~
~ _ ~ -
`
. ~ T ` ~ ~
,
- - ,
~
~ ~ ,
~
v- ~ #
1 ,
~ ; , _
, r ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~4 ~
_ I ~
- ~ i I
.
~ y ~ ~
~ ~ ~ .
t~~ ~ ~ ~M ~
. R ~
. ~M1 ~ !
~'+~'~~r, ~ ~t;
- ^k--S ^ n 4 ,
~ I ~
~ ~ I ~
F~,, ~~"k ~
. ' ~ ~ ` I
~ ~I '
~ ~ ~ `~r ~ ~ 'd - ~ ,
~ ~ ~
, '1 ~
~ ~ 1
~c,~ ~ , ,
E ~ ~
, R ~
' .
~R !
t~ ~1 ~ 1~
~ ,
~ `
, •t~
_ 1
~ r.
- ~ r,'
~ ^ 'Y
~ ~~~~1
~
Y - ~
~ t
~ ~ ~ ~ t
`
~ ~ ~ ~
_ ~
~ _
~ ~
~
► I
~ . ~
~
- ~ ~
_ ~
~ ~ i
1' ~
--x_. , , =~Yf
I " , _ _
.
~
~
- , ,
~
fi"~ `
_ 4;~
~---.1 ~
,
~
~
~ .
t,~
t'S
~Y
~
0.'