The URL can be used to link to this page

CUE-8-95 I , , . RECEJVEp ZONING ADJUSTOR AUG ~ ~'qqr; SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL ) FINDINGS OF FAJr, USE PERMIT FOR AN AUTO WRECKING, ) CONCLUSIONS, JiTNK A'I) SA I,N'A G I: YARn l AN1) I)I~.('ISlONI ~ APPLICANT: llwight Hume, agent for Max Spalding FILE: CUE-8-95 COMPANION FILE(S): VL-9-95 AYPLI(:A"TIUN DES(;IZIP'I,IUN: 1-he; applicant propo5e5 lo expaild ail adciitioilal auto~ I wrecking and salvage yard, known as "Spalding Auto Parts," by adding approximately 11 ' acres of an adjacent parcel of land to the existing facility. Section 14.629.020 of the Zonin(, ; Code of Spokane County allows such a use upon issuance of a Conditional Use Pernut pursuant to § 14.632.240.1 of the Zoning Code. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to section 14.404.100 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County and Spokane County Board of County Commissioners resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended. PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located in the Spokane Valley, surrounded by Felts Road, Knox Avenue, University Road, I-90, Raymond Road and Shannon Avenue in Section 8, Township 25N, Range 44EWM; 2210 N. University Road. Parcel Number(s): 45084.0112, 45084.0108 and 45084.0113. OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available information on file, one or more site visits, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the public_hearing held on June 28, 1995, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on August 1995 to APPROVE the application. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Testimony was taken under oath. 2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file. The site plan, accompanying documents and other documentation is contained in the companion file CUE-8-95. The applicant seeks relief from the sight-obscuring fencing on Knox Avenue (on the north) along the undeveloped right-of-way of Shannon Avenue to the south, along the Raymond Road right-of-way connecting the east end of Shannon Avenue and I-90 to the south, on the south boundary along I-90, and along the east boundary (University Avenue alignment). The applicant would develop the property easterly of the existing residence located on the southeast corner of Knox Avenue and Felts Road, with the parking area, dismantling area and office building north of Shannon Avenue right-of-way, with the balance of the property to the east used for the storage of wreck vehicles and hulks. The property is presently about 90% screened from I-90 on the south side of the property by 30-40 foot tall, existing Australian Pine trees. Farther to the east, along the north boundary of I-90 is a row of poplar trees which provide some screening of the subject property from westbound traffic on Interstate 90. Southwesterly of the property (south of Shannon Avenue w CASE NO CUE-8-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2 nght-of-way and west of Raymond right-of-way) is a hill which provides screerung of property from both east and west bound traff'ic East bound traffic will be very httle aware of the add.itional space devoted to wreclung yard due to the hill and the Australian Puie trees Knox Avenue is a uruque situation insofar as it was developed at pubhc expense as compensation for loss of wreckuig yard property when I-90 was bwlt The only access to the wreckmg yard was south on Umversity Road from Ntssion Avenue Knox Avenue, although a paved pubhc nght-of-way road, leads no where east of Felts Road except to property of the wreckmg yard; in tlus sense, functioiung as a pnvate road Additionally, a dedicated nght-of- way for Indiana Avenue swmgs southeasterly off of Knox Avenue, pnor to its intersection with Umversity Road nght-of-way, and moves southerly and thence easterly through the Spalduig property, eventually connectuig to Montgomery Avenue some distance to the east Umversity Avenue right-of-way exists on ttie east side of the subject property, but, m fact nerther connects south across the freeway nor north across the former Burluigton Northern Railroad property At some unspecified point in the future, both Umversity Road, including a cross-freeway connection to the south and an interchange with I-90 may develop, along with the development of Indzana Avenue as a connection between Knox Avenue, through the Spalding property and thence easterly to a connection with Montgomery Avenue However, none of these projects have any slated time schedule with them 3 The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the proposal as Industrial The proposal is generally consistent wrth the Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan 4 The site is zoned Light Industnal (I-2), which allows the proposed use upon approval of tlus appucation Other uses permitted outnght ui the zone are a wide vanety of mdustnal and business uses 5. The existing land uses m the area of the proposal include I-90 and the balance of the Spalduig Auto Parts facility 6. The following is true with regard to the proposal a Variance VE-9-95 has been granted concurrently wrth this Conditional Use Pernut, reuevuig the apphcant of the requuement of a sight-obscunng fence That vanance addresses a contmgency plan in the event that there's a change in through pubhc road nght-of-way usage in the area or removal of vegetation wtuch presently screens the site reasonably well from viewing by users of I-90 b A nurumum 6 foot high fence is required, however, the State Patrol regulations may requue a taller fence If a taller fence than 6 feet is required, it may constitute a structure which in and of rtself may requue a building pernut c The lot size is approximateiy 11 acres, as compared to the muumum required 5 acres d The fence is required to be a single sohd color Since the applicant is relieved of the reqwrement for a sight-obscuring fence, tlus requuement is interpreted as being a HD/CUE-8-95 Spalding . r CASE NO CUE-8-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3 smgle sohd chaui-luik fence, that is, not a combination of a vanety of different colors of chaui luik e. A performance bond is reqwred to assune comphance with the provisions of dus pernrut, however, since there is no sight obscuring fence reqwrement, there are no provisions of this pemut wluch need to be subject to a performance bond It is sufficient to wrthhold a Certificate of Occupancy unt11 all the condstions of approval are achieved, includuig Certificates of Occupaacy and/or final inspecnon pernuts for the vanous bLUldings associated with this proposal f. Tlus Conditional Use Pernut will be granted for a two year penod of time, at the end of wluch an mspection and review of the prenuse will be made to determine the advisability of renewing the permit or estabhshulg it as a perpetual pernut 7 Pursuant to the State Envuonmental Pohcy Act, the envuonmental checklist and other data have been reviewed and the project has been found to not have any probable significant adverse unpacts to the physical environment A Deternunation of Nonsigruficance (DNS) was issued on May 30, 1995 and sent to ten (10) agencies The agencies reviewing the checkhst nelther mdicated that a more detaled envuonmental review should be provided nor corrunented that the DNS should be reconsidered Comments regarding the envuonmental matters were not made at the pubhc heanng. There was not sufficient evidence presented pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) to withdraw the DNS 8. The proposal is listed m the Zorung Code of Spokane County as a conditional use allowed in the I-2 zone, and the proposal does meet the established and apphcable cntena descnbed for that conditional use 9. The proposal shall comply with the other provisions of the I-2 zone unless specifically ovemdden by the provision of 14 632 240 1, that is, the standards set forth m sections 14 632.330 through 14 632 385 10 No adverse testimony or wntten comments were received regardulg the proposal 11 The apphcant has been made aware of the recommendations of vanous County agencies reviewmg tlus project and has indicated those recommendations are acceptable, includuig• a 6/22195 memo from the Division of Engineering & Roads, a 6/27/95 memo from the Spokane County Health Distnct, a 6i 14/951etter from WA DOT, and a 6/21951etter from the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authonty 12 The proper legal reqturements for advertismg the heanng before the Zoniag Adjustor of Spoka.ne County have been met 13 The Zonuig Adjustor may reqwre such condiuons of approval as necessary and appropnate to make the project most compatible with the public interest and general welfare 14 Vanous performance standards and cntena are additionally needed to make the use compatible with other permutted activities ui the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against unposuig excessive demands upon pubUc utihtaes, and these shall be addressed as conditions of approval HD/CUF,8-95 Spalding ~ . CASE NO CUE-8-95 SPOK;ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4 15. The proposal will not be detrimental to surrounding propemes. 16. The proposal does not unpose excessive demands on pubhc utilities. 17. The proposal, as condirioned, is compahble with uses pemutted outnght ul the zone. DECISION From the foregoing Finduigs of Fact and Conclusions, the Zomng Adjustor APPROVES the proposal, subject to comphance with the following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. GENERAL 1. The followuig cond.itions shall apply to the apphcant, owner and successors in interest and shall run with the land 2. Failure to comply with any of the condztions of approval contamed m tlus decision, except as may be reheved by the Zomng Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zomng Code for Spokane Couaty and be subject to such enforcement as is appropnate. 3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or the conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zomng Adjustor to be wittun the context of the onguial decision. H. DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING 1. The apphcant shall contact the Building Section of the Division of Btulduig and Planning at the earhest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUII.DING ACCESSIBII.ITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTEG°TION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATTONS. Eight foot tall fencmg may requtre builduig pernuts and adherence to yard setbacks. The Plannuig Section of the Division of Builduig & Planning shall clanfy tlus issue. 2 No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for the buildings and/or the wreclang yard/storage yazd until the Planiung Section of the Division of Bwlding and Plannuig has verified compliance with the site plan and other file documents. Because of this hold on the Cert1f'icate of Occupancy, § 14.632 240. l.f is not needed. 3. Compuuon vanance file VE-9-95 relieves the applicant of the necessity of a sight- obscunng fence. However, the chain-hnk fence shall comply with all other state and local HD/CUE-8-95 Spaldmg L CASE NO. CUE-8-95 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 5 regulations for wrecking yards and shall be of a single, uruform matenal and color. It may need to comply with yard setbacks. 4. The ternis of vanance VE-9-95 apply with respect to re-evaluation aad administrative assignment of screemng techniques in the event there is change in the through public road system ui the area. This may re-estabhsh certain reqwrements for sight-obscuring fencing and landscaping. 5. The proposal shall comply with all apphcable standards of sections 14.632.330 through 14.632.385 of the Zonuig Code of Spokane County unless deviations, variances or exceptions have been lawfiilly granted The concern and interest here is the extent of paving or surfacing to be reqLUred pursuant to section 14.632.340 and chapter 14.082 of the Zonuig Code. This decision takes no position mnth respect to stipulatuig the degree or amount of pavuig. That shall be decided dunng the builchng pernut process. 6. This permit expues on September 1, 1997 unless renewed under the follovving tenns• a. An request for renewal shall be received pnor to the above date, preferably 60 days pnor b. Pnor to renewal of the pernut or the granting of pernaanent status, venficahon shall be made of comphance with the vanous conditions of approval, includuig, as appropnate, any admuustratively added reqturements for screetung or sight obscunug fencing. c. After a muumum of one renewal, the Division of Btulduig and Planning may optionally estabhsh either a contlnuing renewal process or may establish, upon request, perpetual status for the Condltional Use Pernmt. Perpetual status may be estabhshed upon a finding that all conditions of approval have been met, includuig any admuustratively unposed reqwrements for additlonal fencmg or screemng as set forth in VE-9-95 and a finduig that no substantive violahons are of record 7. If the Division of Build.ing and Planning believes there are extenuating - cuicumstances associated with the renewal of the pernut, it may cause there to be a pubhc heazing and neconstderation of the pernut; the notification expense shall be that of the county if such reconsideration takes place. 8. A specific landscape plan, plantuig schedule and provisions for maurtenance acceptable to the Planrung Director/designee shall be subnutted with a financial guarantee performance bond or other financial warranty for the project pnor to release of builduig permits. Landscaping shall be uistalled and mauitained so that sight dzstance at a,ccess points is not obscured or unpaired. Although a perfornaance bond is not needed for other site unprovements to be constructed, the Division of Building and Plannuig shall handle the financial wairanty for landscaping in a customary manner. Nothing in tlus decision reheves the apphcant from responsibilrty of complying with landscaping reqwrements reqwred in the I-2 zone. HD/CUE-8-95 Spaldmg ~ . . CASE NO CUE-8-95 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 6 9 The apphcant shall develop subject property generally in accordance withui the concept presented to the Hearuig Body Vanations, when approved by the Buildsng & Plannuig Director/designee, may be pemutted, including, but not limrted to builduig location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All vanations must conform to regulations set forth in the Zorung Code for Spokane County, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be maintained. The site development plan marked "approved plan tgm 8/3/95" is to provide a substantial guidance for review of the site through all phases of design development and construcaon. 10. The Division of Btulchng and Planrung shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Audztor a Title Notice notuig that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special condstions unposed as a result of approval of a land use acuon This Trtle Notrce shall serve as pubhc noace of the condiuons of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded withun the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, m full or in part, by the Division of Btulduig & Planiung The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows. The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on , imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane Couaty Division of Building & Planning. III. DIVISION OF UTILITIES None is requested IV. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County 2 Water sernce shall be coorduiated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3 Water service shall be by an existuig public water supply when approved by the Regional Enguieer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 4. Subject to specific apphcation approval and issuance of perrruts by the health officer, the use of (an) individual on-site sewage d.isposal system(s) may be authonzed 5. Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited. 6 Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prolubited HD/CUE-8-95 Spalding CASE NO CUE-8-95 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 7 V. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 1. The apphcant shall subrYUt for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans 2 The apphcant shall subnut for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health Distnct a detailed combmed on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project, or portion thereof, if the development is to be phased. 3 A pazking plan and traff'ic cuculation plan shall be subrrutted and approved by the Spokane County Enguieer The design, location and arrangement of pazkuig stalls shall be in accordance wrth standard traffic enguieeruig practices Pavulg or surfacuig as approved by the County Enguieer, will be reqtured for any portion of the project wluch is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 4. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan reqLUrements are found m Spokane Boazd of County Comnussioners Resolution No 80-1592 as amended and are apphcable to this proposal 5. An approach pernut shall be obtained from the County Engineering Department pnor to the construction of any new dnveway approaches. This shall be done pnor to the release of a builduig permit, change of use permit or certificate of occupancy. 6. The apphcant shall enter into a"Hold Hanmless" agreement with Spokane County to allow storage of salvage automobdes in the Indiana Avenue nght-of-way. VI. WA STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 The apphcant is advised that the proposed wreclcing yard expansion, as well as portions of the existuig wrecking yard are witlun the footprint of the I-901Uruversrty Road mterchange Tlus proposed expansion is dzscussed in the "Four Lakes to Idaho State Line Environmental Impact Statement." 1'he apphcant is advised of the probable unpact and consequences of expansion of the proposed wrecking yard into ttus area VII. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY The recommended condltions of approval from the Air Pollution Control Authonty are presented below for convenience; but, are not enforceable through this decision 1. All air pollution regulations must be met 2 Air pollution regulations require that dust enussions dunng demohtion, construction and excavation projects be controlled This may require the use of water sprays, tarps, spruiklers or suspension of activity durmg certain weather conditions Haul roads should be treated and erYUSSions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be controlled as well as enussions from a11 other construction related activities HD/CUE-8-95 Spalding . CASE NO CUE-8-95 SPOK;ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 8 3 SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parkulg areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to mmuruze dust emissions 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dut and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces If trackuig or spdls occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken unmechately to clean these surfaces 5. SCAPCA Regulation 1, Article V, reqwres that a Notice of Construction and AppLcation for Approval be submitted to aad approved by our Agency pnor to the constntcaon, uistallahon or establishment of an air pollution source This mcludes any fuel fired equipment rated at greater than 400,000 BTU/hour (boilers, hot water heaters, waste oil burners, suto part bake out or burn out ovens, etc...) It also mcludes paint booths, and other sources of air contanunants. 6 SCAPCA Regulanon I, Article N may reqwre registration wrth this agency 7 SCAPCA Regulation I, Article VI, and SCAPCA Regulauon II, Article IV, address errussion standards All enussion standards must be met 8. Debns generated as a result of tlus project must be disposed of by means other than bunung (i.e., construction waste, etc. 9. Some objectionable odors will likely result from tlus project SCAPCA's regulations state that effective control apparatus and measures must be used to reduce odors to a mmimum NOTICE. PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERNIIT ISSUANCE, PERMTTS MAY BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF T'HE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILTTY FOR EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UP4N APPEAL DATED tlus ~day of August, 1995 THO G S R, AICP Zonuig Ad ustor Spok e County. Washington rE.ED. ~ 1) Apphcant (Certzfied/Retum Receipt Mail) 2) Opponents of Record 3) Spokane County Division of Engineeruig and Roads (Attn Indiana Ave road file) 4) Spokane County Health Distnct 5) Spokane County Division of Utilities ND/CUE-8-95 Spaldmg i . CASE NO CUE-8-95 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 9 6) Spokane County Division of Builduig & Plannung, Pernut Coordmator 7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 S) Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authonty 9) WA State Depatment of Transportation, Spokane Office 10} WA State Highway Patrol, Attn Wrecking Yards 11) Division of Building & Planrung Cross-reference File and/or Electronic Fde NOTE ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL VITHIN TBN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNIlVG APPEAL NNST BE ACCOMPANIED BY $215 00 FEE APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY DMSION OF BtJILDING & PLANNING, PUBLIC WORKS BUII..DING,1026 W BROADWAY AVENLJE, SP4K:ANE, WA 99260 (SECTION 14 412 042 OF TFE CODE F4R SPOKANE CDUNTY) DEADLINE FOR APPEAL IS 4:00 PM ON _ HD/CU&8-95 Spalding ► ~ I 9 . 14 ~j ' RECEIVED ov-'~ ' ~ 1yy5 ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON C004 boetjng IN THE MATTER OF A VARIANCE FROM ) FINDINGS OF FACT, A FENCING REQUIREMENT ) CONCLUSIONS, AND DECISION FILE: VE-9-95 APPLICANT: Dwight Hume, agent for Max Spalding COMPANION FILE(S): CUE-8-95 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant, in association with a Conditional Use Permit application, CUE-8-95, seeks to eliminate the requirement for sight-obscuring fencing as provided in the Zoning Code of Spokane County, § 14.632.240. l.a. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to section 14.404.080 of the Zoning Code of Spokane Counry and Spokane Counry Board of County Commissioners resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended. PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located in the Spokane Valley, surrounded by Felts Road, Knox Avenue, University Road, I-90, Raymond Road and Shannon Avenue in Section 8, Township 25N, Range 44EWM; 2210 N. University Road. Parcel Number(s): 45084.0112, 45084.0108 and 45084.0113. OPPONENTS OF RECORD: Jesse Wolff, II PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available information on file, one or more site visits, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the public 'l~ng held on June 28, 1995, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on August ~ , 1995 to APPROVE the application as set forth in the file documents and as conditioned below. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. Testimony was taken under oath. 2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file. The site plan, accompanying documents and other documentation is contained in the companion file CUE-8-95. The applicant seeks relief from the sight-obscuring fencing on Knox Avenue (on the north) along the undeveloped right-of-way of Shannon Avenue to the south, along the Raymond Road right-of-way connecting the east end of Shannon Avenue and I-90 to the south, on the south boundary along I-90, and along the east boundary (University Avenue alignment). The applicant would develop the property easterly of the existing residence located o❑ the southeast corner of Knox Avenue and Felts Road, with the parking area, dismantling area and office building north of Shannon Avenue right-of-way, with the balance of the property to the east used for the storage of wreck vehicles and hulks. The property is presently about 90% screened from I-90 on the south side of the property by 30-40 foot tall, existing Australian Pine trees. Farther to txie east, along the north boundary of I-90 is a row of poplar trees which provide some screening of the subject property from westbound traffic on Interstate 90. Southwesterly of the property (south of Shannon Avenue right-of-way and west of Raymond right-of-way) is a hill which provides screening of property from both east and w ~ r CASE NO VE-9-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 2 west bouad traffic East bound traffic will be very httle aware of the adrlitional space devoted to wreclcing yard due to the hill and the Australian Puie irees Knox Avenue is a umque situation insofar as it was developed at pubhc expense as compensation for loss of wreckmg yard property when I-90 was built The only access to the wreclcing yard was south on Uruversrty Road from Mission Avenue Knox Avenue, although a paved public nght-of-way road, leads no where east of Felts Road except to property of the wreclcing yard; in tlus sense, functroning as a pnvate road Additionally, a dedicated nght-of-way for Indiana Avenue swmgs southeasterly off of Knox Avenue, pnor to its mtersection with Uruversity Road nght-of-way, aad moves southerly and thence easterly through the Spalding property, eventually connectuig to Montgomery Avenue some distance to the east Uruversity Avenue nght-of-way exists on the east side of the sub~ect property, but, in fact nerther connects south across the freeway nor north across the former Burlington Northern Railroad property. At some unspecif'ied point m the future, both Uruversrty Road, inclucung a cross-freeway connection to the south and an interchange wrth I-90 may develop, along with the development of Ind.iana Avenue as a connection between Knox Avenue, through the Spalding property and thence easterly to a connection with Montgomery Avenue However, none of these projects have any slated time schedule with them 3 A substantive argument made by the apphcant in favor of grantmg rehef from the requirement of sight-obscunng fencing is that sight-obscunng fencing will not really obscure any of the yard contents. Addltionally, the apphcant opined that the pnmary view shed for the proposed wreckmg yard addition is from I-90 and from the housing located to the south and southeast, on the south side of the Interstate tughway From these standpoints, the applicant further opines that the existuig pine trees planted on the north side of the Interstate nght-of-way provide a reasonable and effective screenuig mechamsm Addstionally, the apphcant makes the case that travehng on Knox Avenue is traffic only interested in going to the wreckmg yard, and is therefore not offended by dnving between fenced or unfenced wreclung yards on the north (existing) and on the south (proposed) 4 The pnmary observatron locations of the contents of tlus proposed wreckmg yard are the west bound travel ianes of I-90, the roadway of Knox Avenue and the property south of side of I-90, particularly where the housing is on an elevated bluff or terrace in the 1Vlission Ridge First subdivision Because of the raised level of I-90, installing a sight-obscuruig fence along the south boundary of the proposed wreckmg yard not obscure the contents of the proposed wreckmg yard The existing vegetation along the north edge of I-90 provides far more effective screerung than any sight-obscunng fencmg This is likewise the srtuation from the elevated locauon of 1Vfission Ridge Fust, located on the south side of I-90 As these residents look to the northwest, toward the proposed wreckmg yard area, the only remotely effective screenuig is the 30-40 tall trees in the I-90 nght-of-way Even these trees fail to obscure the entire future contents of the yard The hill or bluff located southwesterly of the mtersection of undeveloped Shannon Avenue and Raymond Road, provides effective screerung for much of the proposal as viewed from Interstate 90 and housing areas to the south of I-90 The only present-day traffic to be found on Knox Avenue, east of Felts Road, where the contents of the future wreckmg yard would be viewed, are customers going to the Spalding wreclung yard and arguably would not be offended by its contents In this respect, Knox Avenue acts as a pnvate road or dnveway into the center of the existuig and proposed wreckuig yard area HD/VE-9-95 Spaldhng CASE NO VE-9-95 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3 The residents/owners of the houses on the west side of Felts Road have offered no objection to the expansion of the wreckuig yard From theu elevated location, a 6 foot or an 8 foot sight- obscunng fence would not screen any contents of the wreckuig yard 5 For all practical purposes, sight-obscuring fencing around the proposed wreclung yard would serve absolutely no purpose with respect to screenuig the contents of the yard Zonuig Code § 14 632 240.1.a, wlule requinug a sight-obscunng fence, also states that landscaping may be requued to break up the exposure of the storage area when it is not feasible to obscure the view of the storage area from the pubhc street due to local rehef condhtions In fact, the existuig landscaping is the only possible way to screen the contents of the wreclcing yard 6 These arguments and opuuons of the apphcant and the concurrent conclusion of the Zoiung Adjustor for that seem valid for the present condztions and cucumstances, the record shows that Knox Avenuemay eventually become Indiana Avenue and be tied into Montgomery Avenue at a point farther to the east, thereby ehnunatzng the argument that Knox Avenue would only used by people gomg to the wreckuig yard It's also lilcely that Uruversity Road will be extended from the south, across the freeway to a connection farther to the north as part of the inter-belt or highway bypass system. Then University Avenue, and east of the site, would become a through pubhc road wlth pubhc traffic capable of viewing the contents of the proposed wreckuig yard It's also likely that an mterchange would be built at Uruversity Road and I-90, takuig quite a bit of land with the footpnnt of the interchange A future interchange would wipe out the existuzg pine trees wluch provide the screeiung, besides reducing the acreage of the proposed wreckuig yard if any of these pubhc road unprovements occur (the extension of Knox Avenue into Indiana Avenue, the estabhshment of University Road as a pubhc through street and the uistallation of an interchange footprint at University Road and I-90), it would then be appropnate to impose the screening now being waived This would likely include a reqwrement for the installation of sight-obscunng fencuig if it would, in fact, produce a benefit to the pubhc of screerung and/or the addition of fairly mature landscaping to as quickly as possible screen the contents of any remaining wrecking yard from the adjacent pubhc nghts-of-way 7 The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washmgton State Envuonmental Pohcy Act, Chapter 43 21C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b) 8 Where the problem complauied of is common to land in the area or throughout the commuruty, the proper solution is legislative rezorung, rather than piecemeal admuustrative exemption The alleged problem or hardslup must relate to the land Community needs or personal hardstups do not qualify as legrtimate grounds for issuing a vanance (Zoning and Land Use Controls, Rohan, § 43 02 [4] [b] [i]). 9 The apphcant has estabhshed that there are a number of special cucumstances which make sight-obscunng fencmg ineffective. Stnct application of the screerung standard of the Zonuig Code causes a practical d.ifficulty dueto there bemg no benefit to the pubhc resulting from a substantial expenditure of money Conditionuig the proposal to re-examine screerung and landscaping at such point in time for screerung as there is an alteration of the public road system in the area effectively deals with the future protection of the pubhc Reserving the nght to re-exarrune the situation in the future is consistent with the requuement of 14 404 082.1 wluch states that the grantmg of a vanance shall be subject to such conditions as will ensure that the adjustment does not constitute a grant of a special pnvilege and further ensunng that the intended purpose of the Zorung Code is mauitained wrth regard to appearaace, landscaping and other features of the proposal, as well as protecting the pubhc interest and general welfare HD/VE-9-95 Spalding . ~ , CASE NO VE-9-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4 10 Stnct apphcahon of the Zoning Code screenuig standard creates an unreasonable burden in light of the purpose to be served by the Code and the benefit to be gained m the pubhc mterest 11 Rohan, in Zorung and Land Use Controls, § 43 02 [5], states that over the years a number of factors have been considered by courts wrth respect to grantmg variances These include• (1) whether stnct compliance anth the terms of the ordinance will preclude a pernutted use from being pursued, (2) whether the land will yield a reasonable return, (3) the degree to wluch the apphcant seeks to vary from the ordulance, (4) the degree of harm wluch will be unposed on the surnouncluig area if the vanance is granted; (5) whether some other method can be pursued to avoid the need for the variance, (6) whether the difficulty is self imposed, and (7) whether the mterest of justice and the general welfare will be served. Rohan contuiues that no factor alone controls and all must be considered. It is a balancing act of the competuig mterest between the landowner and the commumty, as expressed through the zomng document After consideration of all the facts, testunony, relevant case law and mstructive usefulness of Rohan's Zotung and Land Use Controls, it is concluded that the balancing test of competuig interest lies with approvuig the vanance 12 Adverse testunony or written comments were received regazding the proposal The adverse comment came from an owner of property in Mission Ridge Fust subdivision, whose residential structure looks northwesterly across I-90 toward the proposed area However, rt has been demonstrated that sight-obscuring fencing is gomg to have absolutely no screenuig effect on the contents of the yard, due to the height from which the residential structure is with respect to the elevahon the car hulks will be stored 13 The apphcant has been made aware of the recommendations of vanous County agencies reviewing tlus project 14 Vanous performance standards and cntena are additionally needed to make the use compatible with other pernutted activities m the same vicinity and zone and to ensure agauist imposuig excessive demands upon pubhc utilities, and these shall be addressed as cond.itions of approval 15 The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearuig before the Zomng Adjustor of Spokane County have been met. DECISION From the foregouig Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the proposal as generally set forth in the file documents, subject to compliance wrth the following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. GENERAL 1 The follow2ng condltions shall apply to the apphcant, owner and successors in mterest and shall run with the land as long as the Condihonal Use Pernut CUE-8-95 remains valid; except as noted below in the event the bordenng pubhc roads are altered HDNE-9-95 Spalding . ~ . CASE NO VE-9-95 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 5 2 Failure to comply with any of the cond.rtions of approval contained m ttus decision, except as may be relieved by the Zorung Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zonuig Code for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropnate 3. The Zomng Adjustor may adnunistratively make nunor adjustments to site plans or the conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zorung Adjustor to be withui the context of the onguial decision II. DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING 1. The apphcant is reheved of the conditioa for sight-obscuring fencing around the parcel intended for the wreckmg yard Tlus vanance, to be relieved of the sight-obscunng responsibilrty, shall be adnurustratively re-evaluated at such time as any of the existing screenuig fohage is removed, destroyed or otherwise becomes ineffective as a screening device Re-evaluauon shall also occur if the pubhc road nght-of-way changes in the area Re-evaluation shall also take place if pubhc roads are constructed in the existing right-of-way with respect to Knox Avenue extendmg easterly as Indiana Aveaue, Uruversity Road connecting either to the north or the south (across I- 90), or a freeway interchange being installed for the intersection of Uruversity Road and I-90 The intent of re-evaluation would be to adnunistratively deternune, subject to appeal by the applicant, whether or not a combination of sight-obscunrig fencmg and/or relatively mature vegetation screening needs to be installed in order to screen or partially screen the contents of the wreckuig yazd of the proposed wreckmg yard (CUE-8-95) from view from a public nght-of-way, as was surely intended by the Zoning Code The intent for future re-evaluation would be to use sight-obscunng fencing where it would be effective, to not use it where it would be ineffective, and to use relatively quick-growmg, moderately mature, irngated vegetation in order to develop a total or partial screen with respect to viewing the conte of the wreclang yard from any public nghts- of-way which have through, public traffic on t e , DATED thi~ day of August, 194 , ~1~~ " THOlVtAS G MOSHER, AICP Zonin Adjustor Spokand,Cou ty, Washington FILED 1) Apphcant (Certif'ied/Return Receipt Mad) 2) Opponents of Record 3) Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads 4) Spokane Counry Health District 5) Spokane County Division of Utilities 6) Spokane County Division of Building & Planning, Pernut Coor(inator 7) Spokane County Fire Protection Distnct No 1 8) Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authonry 9) WA State Department of Transportation, Attn Leonard Cash 10) WA State Highway Patrol, Attn Wrecking Yards 11) Division of Planrung Ci oss-refei ence File and/or Electroruc File NOTICE PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE RELEASED HD/VE-9-95 Spalding • J CASE NO. VE-9-95 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ZONIlVG ADNSTOR PAGE 6 PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF TBE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. H4WEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABII.TTY FOR EXPENSES AND INCOrlVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS OVERT'CfRNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL NOTE ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIIN TEN (10) CALEND,AR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNIlVG APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANI.ED BY A $215 00 PEE APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUII.DING & PLA►NNIlVG, PUBLIC WORKS BUII..DING, 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Secaon 14 412.042.of the Zorung Code for Spokane County) DEADLINE FOR APPEAL IS 4:00 PM ON 8 1311915. HDNE-9-95 Spalding ~ Y ~ .s ENGINEER' S REi4 ~t SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE CUE-008-95 -95 Related File # i ) Date to Review 06-28-95 Time 9:00 # 1 Date to AA & DR Time Project Name AUTO WRECKING/SALVAGE ADD/SPALDINGS No. Lots 3 No. Acres 11 Range - Township - Sectioll SITE ADDRESS S KNOX/W UNIVERSITY/E FELTS PARCEL # 45084.0108 Applicant's Name MAX SPALDING Phone # 924-3300 Address 2210 N UNNERSITY RD Work # Dates Conditions mailcd r - % Cnntract person Phonc ;i FLUOD ZONE No W S Scllool Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name Planning Contract Person Phone # 456-2205 Date Submitted Description Initiais AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING ~ FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & C4PY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS -LOTS BOND RELEASED - ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HEARING EXAM APPROVED DEIVIED- APPEALED BBC / I' i~ i i_ ; i i : : i , i I 17 i ; ; ; > BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL/SUZAN tv L, ~ STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ~S A N ll'r ~ I I ~ 1 - • t l ~ ~ - WaSh111gto11 StatE' Eastern Region Department of Transportation 2714~ N. Mayfiair Street ~ SpQkane, WA 99207-2090 Sid Morrison Secretary af Transportatian (509) 324-60(]0 ~~~~ENED . ~u % 15 1995 SPCON~ CQUNTy ENG4NEER June 14, 1995 Mr, John Todd Spakane Gounty Planning 1026 W Broadway AWe Spcrkane, VV'A 99260-0240 Re: Spalding Auta Parts I-9Q Dear Mr. Todd ; The Washington State Department of Transportation ('WSD4T) would Iike to make the faliowing additianal comments (supplemental to our June 8, 1995 letter) to the above referenced developrnent: The propased expansion tQ Spalding Auto Wrecking Yard falls within the fvotprint of the praposed University interchange, as depicted in the Four Lakes to Idaha State Line EnWironmental Impact Statement (please see attached). WSDQT is working in cooperatipn with Spakane County Engrneers toward the eventual expansian of LJniwersity itoad and this new interchange with I-90. At the present time this project is unfunded, but we have identificd this as a needed project in the future. VVe feel it important that the applicant be made aware that the EIS documentation exists, and that it nat only affects this expansion but the existing auto wrecking yard. Item A8 ofthe checklist sliould be modifed accardingly. If you have any questions or need further informatiQn regarding this matter, please feel free to contact nne ar Jana Augenstine of our Planning Offce at 324-6199. 5incerely, LEt]NARD CASH, PE Regional Flanning Engineer LCC:ja cc: Scatt Englehard, Spokane County Engineers Project file -s~i - »,r~ - - • ~S ~ ~w j .^en ..w+IC^~v^-+^~+;rm i+y~' R~ hti~,: ,f,~„~ ~xkj F~e"~i~ ('~'k'►~'~~~~~:IiE~_~p~4~~~~~A i 4* ~ '7", ~~tT"~"` c ^t ..r L+ ."i, ~ 4 +~~.~e~`•~• r~~' ~~J-'~ +'~I~ ~If ~ ~ y; 41.077 ~ q'~ i.~,~ ~r+ y.+= , • ~~"?i' ~_s ~ wrt~" .!1 ~ . . ti} u~..~ n• t l~~ r~ 04, + ,~~4~'[r~., M ~ M1~ ~ l w Y• r;q~r r MA ~ lr'~S~ w 5~yi ~{~.Y~~y~l~, 1 ~ ~ } ~ ~n:,' lr~; ~ t.,~~r1•. , P9,+i~~, ~ {M~ ■ r ~j aS , i~R ~~'k~,~ . , ~ . ~ k ,iRr;~ ~ ~'f A~ ~S~y~ ~ n v. 4L` ~'f"~ . . . ti~"';i •'{f~y `7 .~w r ~ 1f ~ ~ ' i]t X a`, ~.~5~•.~~ i ' p~ d ~ ~ xt~~ ~ A ~R ~K' ~ ~ 5~~~ f. ~ ..l`~,~" ~ r ~'lYT~ . /N +y '~`^.x'•. ~ . f ~ !~p; zr~4ir. ' r~ ~ X~ar ~1F,~rx ~ ~b~~r l~:i iY~R~ ~ ~}4 ,r.., t,,v t x al~ ~1"~4t,y , i 'M i~r:r{1 1 ~ sl! 1 ~~l,i+~ f ~ 1 Z a1Y3 p` 3 h1 ~T41.~ k5 d Z j ~ x :,.I~ r~ ~'-r~~ri ~ ril1~~ • ~ ~`w.' , ',Y.'°,&"ar , ''w~e'A.'t'~~ ~nw:^..v"` ~ .~.v' $ L 'tr+.t'rY' ~ z . . . ~ ` • . ~"'.5~' w 1 n.'i '6°~'~ ~ T ~`4. •''7~ . ~ ~9 • . l 7+,.... .:r.,-rw. . • ~ ..?'~y"i`~. ~W ~'.s?~-x.,~,. ~ *+a r ,i 1vi 1~ t . r; ~~r" i$.. ~."'k 9 T1.~L s AI A . ~1n' t . p" *1 y . f; •~~'.,~~wl ~?•:1 \ ~ .r y ~ . .t ~y'ti'•.1 %'M ,:ir kf-"!qr~~ + ffk~J-, ,r d , ~„~.~,..~,~ru+4'~r~w„~, ~s,.~ ka, -f 7"• TT t,'~+Yx~ °'^~1,,1 ~ ~1~•[ $ yr~~~ i~±rr~«'7~« , ~ °d Yi `R~`r~ ,#t:"•"~~'~' ti~Y" ~ n f;.~;,~~ r(t.t k ~ i ~ylri;,e s wk,.~: ~ '.,.`r ~~l r ~~~'.,,r :~2 d ~ ~'7~~ °.~1~ ~ 3~.'+ • ~ v~ i!iai ~~i~.. i~k i `4 ~ v 'i ' .1 1~+, k ~ 'l' t v; ' yJi« . ~ . . !.y.} ~ ~ . 11~ '1~' r~. . ~ "~,'f' rq' f t t j ~4 Y ~ ~ ` ~ , . ,7;y~'~4 , r'"S ~i , r~ NN,, t M~ l~ . r ~ ~ ~ 7,a~ ` 1 1y1" ~x . 1 Vt_~. . ~ i 1 - ~ ~ ~ w ~ C r d Fi ~ s . r 4 ~ t1 . }J yF +~41 i• ~ l i~S < y t y4..r ~ M~~S •\S ,G ~q.- + e. ~f ~ u ~ ~~4J r` yl~ ~r ~ y 1~I ~'~~v".~ ~C ~ ~j.# 1+'~1~y ~ Y ~1~v'K~, s ~ Y~ . Y ~ . . -fl'' ~ f , k ~r., , ,!'y - T N ry.v. ~ Y ti' • A. I a • ' i ~ ~ ya~~ ~f ~ ' ~ 1 '•~i,L .,.~a ~ ~ 1 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ . r t..~..;~w~'~- , w, , ` Y,. 'P g . tA ~'q °r ~ V • r ~ a Ati' ~t ~ i~~;: 'a M j*, { s ~fiY ;I ~ r1~` 'r y S~' ' i~ a~ 4~jp~;r~r; L•. ~r ~ ~ ~r'Y~;r ~`'4.~,~ ,.s .~L~~.~,. p~P~,~' r .~4 r(.. , Ye • ►4,~}~ .l~T :~Dy r LP ~a.~ A ~ f/-1F~ r-.,h~ C,~ -.w:~ r r • ~ ' -G+; +r~ ~ ~ ?w a rYti `*'9'e~f ..,.,y;; '~x ~y. - _ x. , , 'J ~ r ~ ~ 1 MM~i~ .,~.~.;ry ,,;y'y ~ ~ ~aNA~ r. ~ w"'r-h., 71 ~'~f i' ~'t 1 '4 ~ ° ~f" < < "'~~~1. t'~' ~ P~~ P + ~f ~ s . .~•e.~ :,a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'?9~ ~r~'s ~'ti ~ tf ^~'v~'~S , . ~ l~ i~~ ~ ~ ~ rt _ , ~ t tiar i r'{Q; F a `+"t ~ s ~ ..i;.aP#% -e `.~'~f ;ri 2'•..,~°~7 ~ r~ ~ J' , , P8 ~ . n ~ ~ . . , . . i2 f k~I.~ , ~ iv~ ~ S7 M ~ C'.,p~ ~ ~ . . • ~ ~ ~ wI~Rr~' r . L ~ , ~ ,~q~ wra ..y y►, .~y' ~ r.~L ~~~~"„~'W rPr.r .b t l~w~.,~y`~~ y ,,,.~.J .r ~ .:~~T• ~ ~ ~ ! ~ '~.rN~+`~j~'7►~ a" ~ X~ ~ ~ " 1`~ ~ A, ' ~ . ~ 'I IC A a~ ~~t' f~~4 ~ ~ . Y'+~ ~ ` f. ' ~~x H ~ A ~ F " w ~~~I,'+~ ~r • ,w~ , , ` h.~ r ~ ~ " ~ ~ + . ~ ~ , ~ ~'I~ 4 x . ~ F , '34~'~1 pt~ Y . - ~ ~ 1•,,'.'yyi.~~ t. rid k.r S~ r M,~ 1.79 : ~ x ~ + r,~ r";~, 1:~_ r v f~,, yir r w t~ ~1 ' y,1~''+~, t~ .r. ~f~,,¢ ~1_ . ~~G i ,tiw a d Y~~N ~~S{ r~ y~~~1+ t i •k~ ~ ~A~. j : lw q~.r d~*q . q~. 1`~V p;-'~~ \ ~ ~ yL .y,l. y { • T `r ~jJ^'~I W~i 1•,• b w ~ 1 ! ~.i~s'I .A y, 1 ~ ~ . ' 1 l.y,, r a,~~~ ~~11 f i Y ~ • ~ ~ , ~~~r~ F• `i ~.ir. 1 J 4 F' ".'.~+.r % Y~.'~ ~ u . , Final Environmer~lak ir~pact Statement University R d. I/C S okar~e p M'~ 289 V, ~cin, ~t lnterstate 90 pro osed interchan e Faur lakes to Idaho State Line ie 2-16 g Fg u , Chapter 2 PQge 73 t ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 - C"ONDTTTpNATS , A PLTC''ATTnN - TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Zoning Adjustor FROM: Division of Erigineering & Roads, Scott Engelhards~, DATE: June 22, 1995 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE CUE-008-95/VE-009-95, SPALDING, MAX The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following commenta are offered for inclusion in the Findings and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be approved. Prior to release of s building pesmi.t or uee of property ae propoaed: E19 The word "applicant" shall include the owaer(s) of the property, his/her heirs, asaigns and successors. E43 Applicant ahall submit for acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and accese plans. E44 The applicant ahall aubmit for acceptaace by the Spokane County Sngineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and aurface water disposal plan for the entire pr03ect or portion thereof if the development is phased. E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be aubmitted and approved by the Spokane County 8ngineer. The deaign, location and arrangement of parkiag atalls shall be ia accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or sur€acing as approved by the County Engzneer will be required for any portion of the pro3ect which is to be occupied or traveled by vehiclea E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requiremente are found in Spokane Board of County Commiseioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to thia proposal. E66 The appliaant should be advised that an approach permit must be obtained from the Spokane Countyr Engineer Department prior to the construction of any new driveway approaches. This must be done prior to the release of a building permit SPECIAL CONDITION: The applicant shall enter into a"xold Harmless" agreement with Spokane County to allow storage of ealvage automobilee in the Indiana Avenue Right of Way. U . t t ~ . S P O K A N E C O U N T Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLtS D HUE3BARD, DIRECTOR NOTUQ:~ CIF SPOKL~NE CWV W ~~Y ZONRNQ„u /QDJUSTOR PUBIIeUC IHIIEAI18UNG A1~YIIA 1FOIRTIHICOMIII~YQu IDIECIISBQDI~Y DATE: June 28, 1995 RECEOVED TIME: 9:00 a. m. or as svon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane County Planrung Department MAY 3 11995 Commissioners Assembly Room, Pubhc Works Building 1026 W. Broadway ~ f~neetW~ Spokane, WA 99260 AGENDA ITEM 1 Files: CUE-8-95/VE-9-95 A) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR EXPANSION OF A WRECKING YARD B) VARIANCE FROM FENCING STANDARD PROP()SAL: The apphcant proposes to expand an add.inonal Auto WreclQng and Salvage Yand, lnown as "Spa2ding Auto Parts," by adding approximately 11 a,cres of an adjacent pancel of land to the existing facility Section 14.629.020 af the Zorung Code of Spokane County allows such a use upon issuance of a Cond.itional Use Pernut pursuant to § 14.632.240.1 of the 7oning Code. The applicant also seeks a vanance to not use sight-obscunng fencing as requued by § 14.632.240. l.a. LOCATION: Generally located in the Spokane Valley, surrounded by Felts Road, Knox Avenue, Shannon Avenue and Uruversity Road in Section 8, Townslup 25N, Range 44EWM; 2210 N. University Road. EXISTING ZONING: Light Industnal (I-2) SITE SIZE: Approximately 11 acres APPLICANT: Max Spaiding 2210 N. Uruversity Road Spokane, WA 99206 AGENT: Dwight Hume Adams & Clark, Inc 1720 W 4th Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 N01'E: THE 7ANATG ADNSPOR WII.L ISSUE A WRITTEN DF.CZSION'PO APPROVE OR DETTY THE ABOVE PROPOSAL.. ONLYTHE APPLICANTOR AN OPPONENT OFRFAORD MAY APPEALTHE?ANIIYG ADNSMR'S DFCtSION AND MUST DO SO Wl1'M 7F1Y (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE DECISIONS SIGNIlIG APPEAL MUST BE ACC'OMPAMED BY A$Z15 00 FEE FILED AT THE PLANNIlVG DEPARTMENT, PUBLdC WORKS BUILDINC, 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Secbon 14 412 042 of the Zotung Code of Spokane County) THE ABOVE REFERENCED FII.E MAY BE EXAMD-iF,D AT TI-E PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUC • SPOKANE, WnstIING7'oN 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205 • FAX (509) 456-2243 • TDD (509) 324-3166 4 j t , t WASHNGTON STATE ENVIROrUIENTAL PQLICY ACT (SEPA): EnvironaQental Checklist and other data was reviewed and the project was found to not have any probable significant adverse impacts to the physical environment A Deternaination of Non- significaace (DNS) was issued on May 30,1995 on behalf of the Spokane County Planning Director, the respoasible official under SEPA. The Environmental Checklist and DNS were sent to 7 agencies of jurisdiction ar expertise and identified public interest orgaaizadons. Comments regarding envimnmental matters will be accepted at the hearing. Formal appeal of the DNS may be filed. Contact the Planning Deparbment for details. PhysicaUy Disabled Access: All meetiags and 6esrings will be conducted in facilities which are aceessfble to dissbled individuals. For more information, pleese contact the Spokane County PlsnnYng Depsrtment at (509) 456-2205. NOTE: TIHEZONIIVCi ADJUSPOR WIId.ISSUE AWR1TTN DECZSION'PO APPRUVE OR DF.NY THE ABOVB PROPOSAL. ONLY TtRE APPIICAWOR AN OPPONENT OF REOORD MAY APPEAi. THE Z0NNG ADJUSMR'S DF:aSION AND NNST DO SO WtTIUNTEN (10) CAi,F1VDAR DAYS OFTHE DATE OPTHE DDCISIONS SIGNNG APPEALMUSTBB ACOOMPANIE?D BY A$21SA0 FEE FIIM AT TIRE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. PUBLdC WORKS BUIIAIN(3.1026 W. BROADWAY. SFOICAM WA 99260 (Section 14A12 042 of the Zonmg Code of Spokane County) THE ABOVE RFd~diPNCBDFILEMAYBE ATT,HEPIANNIlNG DEPAR'TMENI'. . . " ` vt..g..gs 000000000011 000000000011 - . eM~y~ ~ cr. ~ j A 040 . ~ : 1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rB'~~~ _ • a • ~ / ~c ~ M °'E' ; 04 ► v ,{i` t~' E~U~EY p ~ ~ A ~ " • dAGKS ~~*,~,*R o ~ ~ ~ 'Ca,•,~ ~ OR pa ~ M~ tit GQ~E~Y . . / . MO ~ C.„ A ` ,p 1969 INT~p'N.~TIf?N~1L R ~ Mp nv~a'~ • - _ ` _ - . " i~~~,~ ~►NN~'~ _ ~ N rr.~~"'~~'`~~r• ~'Xf,,.~ r ~ ~T f~r►~/ S I~ ~ ~ti+.~••"t /ff. . ` {~h,~{~~h 3F r J r..N ~►j4*+ ' Y 5 H - ~ ~1 ~ Vb ~ • Sr ~ 'J► ,.4~ . ~ VA ey-rt~ ~ foO l • 4 ~ ~ M ~s ~ . • M w ELL . , . . CI " - OG . '~t • ~ iY ' E ~ ~ ~ 4 r 1 ^ J ~ u. ` s . p~ ~y ~ • • • ~ C Z ~ ~ ~t'=• ~ ' • . . ~ s- , ' ► ' r ~ - ~ ~ - a + n I / • ~ ~ ~ ~ I \ IT VI ~ . SIT SPOKANE- ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10,230 -F RECEIVED ~ APR 1 01995 ~ sPoKe►rvE couNTY PLANIVIfHG DEPARTMENt C~UE• $~5 , Ve ~V°~~ , • SPOICARE'EMVIROtMEH7Al ORDIHANCE (YAC 197-11-960) Sectton ll 10 230(1) , `I a Environnentat Checkllst File Ho.L,~4~`~`^ ~J Puepose of Checkitst The State Envfronmental PolicY Act (SEPA) thapter 43 Zlt Rt1i, requlres all yovermrcntal ageecies to eonsider the enrtronnentsl tatpaets ot • OroOo 1 S, 7 before meklng decisions. An Enrlronaental lmpatt Stateaent (E15) must be preQared toe all proposals wtth prosable s/gnttleant adverse 1mpatts on the auallt of the environment The purpose of thls cAeckltst 1s to provlde infonaatlon to help you and the agency ldent/ty 1apaets traa yeur proposil land to reduce or avoid tapects frora the proposal. ft /t can be done) and to heiP the a9ency decl4e whether an EIS is requlreQ. instructions for Applicants This enrtrortaental checkllst asks you to descrlbe some baslc tnformattoe about yeur proposal. 4avernxaental agencies use thls efiedclist to detertntee vhether the envlronaental tmpacts of your proposal are signtflcant, reauiring preparation ot an EIS. Ans++er the questlons brietlY, rlth the aast preeise lntormation knowa, or glve the besi deserlptlon you tan 11ou nwst ansver each question accurate:1 .eaG za;~'~:1y, to the best of your knorledge In aast cases. you should be able to ans+rer the puesttoas troa ~ own observatlons or prosect plans xlthout the need to hfre experts. tt you rea11y do not know the ansrer, or it a question doea not sppty to your proposal. wrlte •Qo not know' or 'Qoes not applY • taaplete answers to the auesttons now may sro16 unnetessa" delays 1ater. Soc+e questtons ask a0out 9avernaenta{ regulations. :uch as :oning, shoreltne. •nd landwark desl9natlons. Ansver these questlons /t you ean. If you have probleas, the govermentat aqenctes can asslst you. The chectlist auestions sppty to a11 perts ot yovr proposal, even 1t you pian to do thew over a perloQ of ttme or on ditferent pareels ot tend. Attaeh aey addlttonal inferaetfon that will describe your proposal or its env{ronnental effects The agency to MhicA you subalt thls ehecklist may ast you to explale your answers or provide addlttonal infonoatton reasonably related to detersalntrtg tf CAere aay be s14n1titant adverse Impaet. Use ot ehadcllst for rtonproject proposals Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, eren though questlons wsy be answereA •does not apply. IN 1100ITION, eouplete the SUPPIEKENTAI SFIEET FOR RONPqOJECT ACTiONS(Part D) For nonprosect actlons, the referenees 1n the eheckllst to the words 'profect.' 'applicant.' artE •property or tite' sAould Oe read at 'proposat.' 'proposer,• and 'aEfected geographit area,' respettively. A. BAClC6ROUND . 1. pme of prnposed project. if appllcable 2. +tase ot Applteant ' 3. Ilddress and phone n=?of lcant o r contact n i 4. Date theckilst prepared ~ . S. Ageecy nquesting checklist 6. Proposed t1Atng or schedule (tec 1ng phaslnqo if applltable)• 4 0 ~ ~.a..~ ~ . • , . , --&~4 --b 7- ca+ Lhfd 7. a. Op you have anr pians tor tuture addltions, expanston, or tarther actlrlty retated to or comeeted vlth thls oropoul? If y+ef. explatn.AO e. Oo you own or Aare options on tand nearby or adjacent to tM s propasal7 tt s. explain. - 4w_~ . r ~ . , ' z~- f-ic S. List any envlronaental 1ntoraiation you ow apout that has been prepared. or xtll be prepareE, dtreetly related to thls prcpossl.~~ ~ ti -nr :40r-M..IAD.~F.P- rWO ~ aidAcemEod UO ` Rev.2/1/BB 1 f SPOTJl1iE WaRON}Mtr'tAL ORDIHAt7CE (vwC 191-1.1-960) Seccioo il 10 230(1) ♦ a A MG1CC80DRD (cooClnued) 9 Do Tou losov vhethet applicacioqp_a[e pendiag Eoc gorernmcetal apptoval• ot other ptoposal• direeclr atfeecleg the propertp eoveted br yout propoasl' I[ Tess e:plain ~ 10. [.isc aay governmeot appYOVals ot pecmlts that vill be needed for rour proposal. it iatovn 11 Clve a bcief. complete de■criptioa of yauc ptoposal, ineluding iT►e ptoposed vmes aad the sise o[ the psojnet and •ite :hete are sevesal questioos Lcer !a chts check t tha ask rou to descr b eest in a ct~ o Y proposal Tou do 9L Dt to Tsp t i~ aM~tetssa tl~i~ wse . I, ~v a A )t) ! . ~ hf, a Sa ~SI IaZE Vr, 1,he Seeand , Li-be r pwa. Y1'1l~lL°kl S h zt~ W70 ~d rW - P- ~ ~ ` !5 12 Loeatioa et the propoeal Cive sutEicieat lalocmatLon foT a petron to undecstand cl►e preeise loestion o[ rour pro eaed P Droseet. iueluding a street addcess, i[ aor. and seetLoo. tovnshtp and tange. ii icnovn It a propo u 1 vould oeeuc over a tange ot ssea, plovidt the Tange or ~'i1 ~~1&~{~ boundarie• oE the •ite(s) Provide a legal daseriptian, oite p Ln, vielnitp aap, and topogcaphLc ssp, if rearoaablr avai Lble, S~hile You ehould aubait aor pLoe cequiced~bY ~a1e,110,1 ~;s.~ o~~~~ed to duplieace aups oc detailed pLai subaittad vlth any 9ersit appliestion ~ reLted to tl~is chetklist + ~ tAot-lb F'C--qc~ T,~Ut~~-h op kro~ _ U,mVY~rS~ TGAd -east 11 Does the pcoposed action lie vithiq the Aqulter Sensitive Area (ASA)' :he Gene al Sever ervlee Aiea! 'ahe Prioritr Savat Saevier rea? :he City of Spokaae2 (See Spokaue Councy'it ASA OvetLr ione Atla• tor boundarter) '~U 13 51qt Qp-ra~ ~~~er, S C►r V&p C<fP~. -e i)n LS'~rt/e-P oxpa_ _ :TA Noes r1tS~ L1e, z,a~~in +he itil OF ~ :o sE coxrV."co si Arri.icaxt' a nrataoKIM+-.et a.aQxrs Evaluatlon For 1 EAR-1t 11 gnneT Osa Oalr a Ceaeral desc[ipcion of the aite (cirele ooe) iLt olliag hilly. •ceap stopes, omncainous, other 0 'fiac Lo the •teepest slope oa the sice (appraxLsate peeeent •lope)!ffO/a !C e V!►at gensral types ot soils ate foue~6 on the site (foe exaople. elay. #and, gravel. paat. auek)!~"s .C]~If you lmov the elassitiutioa ot agrieultucal so L. sveeifr thea and note snr vriee tasslaod A l"~j ~)~t , k ~ ej • d Are thera suctaee indieacloos or histosy oi unstable soils irt the tmsediate vltinityt I[ so, 7kf4r- de.«see ~.In ~ ~ t-~e.~.~~c•~. ~~y~-~s1~,u-~ ~~.C~" ' S u .1,~•~,, f ~~-,w t ~ w w . 2 C / /'I /O«lC es- t . • . SPOKANE ENYIROMHEHTAI ORDIHANCE (t1AC 197-11-960) Sect ion 11 10 230(1) B ENYIROMiENTAL ELEHENTS(continued) Evaluation For , Agency Use Only e Describe the purvose, tY . and approxima.te quanttti s ot any tt i radin pro osed Indlcate source of t111'~ n or itlin !2~ Gt&fjff_ a CVneyn14 la C, ° e. f Could ervsion oaur as a result of tlearing, coesttuction, or use? If so, generally descrlbe NQ ^La.W 1 Il e¢ t- QF t~S 6o-c-4-h ~o oQfh -rc' ~v • i~ l~,r/?1gs- g About xhat percent of the slte rill pe cover th 1 r ous surfates efter proJeet construc• tlon (for ezample, asphalt or bu11d1nqs)7 t L•~L~-' '►.~.~.s~ '~'~~L j~~ . h Proposed measures to reduce or tontrol eroslon, or other lmpatts to the earth. 1t aey 0 " I'S 'P ' d 7 ND~ D ~1 rpSs ~p . 2 A1 R a What type of eialssions to the air vould result frao the propossl (1 e., dust, autaeobite. odors ~~~L,~ industrial, wood smoke) during constructton and when the pro~est 1s eo le d? 50ny~ generally describe and give approxlmate quantltes 1f kno+rn. ~ , ~t► ,Q,vs•. ..,.~.~-v~s~ ' ~ ~ D -77 ~L~_1(~ YJ.lJ.L~' b Are there any off-stte ources ot emtsstons or odor that mny affett your proposal3 If so. 9enersllY descrlDe (~l ) , A/~~ c Proposed measures to reduce or contro) emisslans or other impacts to a1r. 1f any Nk) F 4 ±d a- Le ' ~ I ~bu~ U.,.5 t .C~~r ~ 3 uatEa a Surfate (1) ts there any surtaee xater Oody on or in the lmoedtate rtclnlty of the slte lneluding year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes. ponds. retlands)? It yes. de c 1 e type and provide names If approQriate, state rrhat strean~ or river it flows lnto (2) Hill the project requlre aey vrork over. 1n, or adjacent to w t in 200 feet) the descrlbed waters' If res, pleese describe ena attach avallable plans • ~ SPOlU2tL LHVItioMMRAL dRbItGNCE ~ (•aAG 197-11-960) Seccioa 11 10 230(1) 6 LNVTROtrMMAL ELL`ffiN':S (cootlaued) EvILluatioa For Jgeecy Use OalY Escimate the amouat of till and dsedge saterial ehat vould bn pLeed !a or reeoved [tom ehe surLacc vacer or vetland• aod..~ndiu e the a ea of the • te t1+at vould bn aflsetad. Indieass tl►e souTee of iill msterial ~ ~ (i) Vill tl+a proposal raaultrs surtsce wtet vitMrava s os divesslonut Cive a Zeoeral deserip- tion. 9utpose. and apptoxioate qusntities. it knovn _ (S) Doe• the psopoaal lie vithir s 100-pear tlood PLio! It no, aote louelea en tAe aite plan. ~ (6) Does the pcoposal involve any diselusgee of vute aateital~ tuc(ate vatetsf I[ •o. deserfbe the type of vaste and ontieiqated volume of disehargs . S Cround (1) Itill gTow+dvater be vithdravn, or vtll vacer be dise ged to senadvates! Cive e ecal dereriotion, puspome. and •pproximate auan[ities. if Imovn Vti+--d (2) Osscsibe vaste oaterial that vili be dischaeged lato the gtouad t=os septic taaks or othat sanitary vaste treaomant taeilisy De uYibe the geeeral eize of t!►e srstem. tbe nuoDer of Aouse• c rveQ ( t applicab ) s the a bec of cs stes( ase eYpa d te •etve ~ "pS r Il, ~~t.~rrleY~ (3) Deseribe any •ystevs. ochec tlue ebose deslaaed for the bisposal of weitasr vu te, 1netaYled tot the purpose of diseharging [luids belav che 6eouod •uctaee (leelude• systess sueh as thosc Eot the disposal of •toca vatec or dralasta Lson Lloor dralao). Desesibe t6e eype of systeo. che aaount of matetisl co be disposad of chtcougb the systen and the erpes of material• t likely ce be dispoeed of (lncludiag aaterials vhtcb eaces th epacrastentl7 through s9ills oti as a rssult of iisefi;htiag acsivities) y (4) Vill anr cl►micsl• (especially ocaaaie •olveet• os patroleua tuels) be stotad ia abova- arouod o u ergrou •cocasn tas t i•o, vbat, pe aad apaa tiee of materia_1s vlil be .eo«a• - .r.~_o. l' ttn~-j -~rrerP 1~'1]P lamc~ 4 t gPO1CANE EtTOYRONtSKIAL ORDIt1ANCE . (VAC 197-11-960) Seeclon 11 10 230(1) • s OJViRpNlMRAL CLMMT'S (continued) Evaluation Poc Ageaey qse Only (S) t11+ac proteecive messuses vtll De talcen to iasure that luks oc spillS oI aar eheaicals scoreb ot used oa sica vill eot be alloved to percolace to groundvacec ( ht• 1 luded eeaSu.tCq9 to keep ehemLcals wc of disposal •7steas deteTibed ia 3b(2) and 3b(3)3~ ' r/~s~s J1 b ~ 1 1J ~ e Vater Runoft (ineluding •tom v.cer) (1) Desaribe the soucee of runoft (ineludiag stots vater) aad setlod oi eolleetiee tad dispoal it aay (includa qwacities. !E +re) 4hese vi ehi• ratar flow? /~till thia vi►te[ [ v Lnto other vaters' I[ so, deseribe~`~ 1-YD (2) 'Jill any ehemicals be stored. Aandled ot usad on ihe site in a loeatioo vhere a@pill of leak vill drala to surfaee, q~,gTOue►Svatet os to a stoss vater disposal srsem disehargit►6 to sucface or gcoundvatert (3) Could vasce masarial• eotas grouttd ot •uriaee w tersT 1f so, sanerally deseribe ~ d Pcoposed measures to ceduee oc eontcol suetaee. groue►d, and cunoEl waces ispaets, tf aer (if t tbe proposed actioo lie• vLtAin the Aquifnt Sensitive Asea ba espeeiallr eleas oa Mlaaatiooa r rclating co taeilitie• eoneeeniog Seetions 3b(4). 31(5). aed 3e(2) of thie eheeklist). ~ v w i 4o eax,-s /.,*)iij f ci ra uLd yu, o F N * a runs a Teck or eircle type o[ ve6etation tound on the •Lte deelduous [see alder, maple. sspea, other ~ evergreer cree fi[, eedar. pina. othet s hrubs ~ gra&@ puture erop oc 6cain vst soil plaets. eattail. euttareuP. bullrush. skuok eabp.ae, other t vater plants vatei lilly. eelgrame. dltoil. ot?tnt other types oL vc;etatloa b vhat kind and asount ot ve6station vlll Se rmoved os altered! &051'S~i~~ urmvp(4- c List tbreatened or endangaced •peeies lutova to be on or near the •1te AqQ& d Proposed landseapinao a ot oati~e p L . or other asure@ to e~ rn oc eo]~anee vegeta ion INC on the •ite, if an~ ~ w 5 ~ . SPOKAliE ENYIRONNENTAI OROtAAtICE ' (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1) 8 fNY1ROM1EHT11L ELEMEii75 (contlnued) Eraluatlon For A9ency Use Only 5 ANIMALS a Clrcle any birds and animals whlch hare bcen observed on or near the stte or are known to be on or near the site btrds bawk. heron. eaqle, songblyds. other sicn`P mammals deer, bear. e1k, bearar, other tish bass, salawn, trout. herring, she11f1sA, other rQt othec b List eny threatenM or endangered spectes known to be on or eeer tAe stte. -LIA1p c. is the site part of a migratton route? If so, txpla/n d Proposed oeasures to preserre or enhance w11411fe, 1f any 5 ENERGY AHD NAtURAL RESOURCES a Mhat kines ot energy (electrlc, nstural gss, wooQ stove, solar) w111 be used to meet the the completed r fec 's ener need sc 1be wh th r 1t w1 be use tor heatlnq aiaa~ •c- turing, etc ` I S 4Ar a y by t ~J b Nould your project aftect the potentlal use ot solar energy by adjacent properttest It so, generally destrSbe ~ ~ c Nhat kinds of energy conservatioo features are included in the plans of this propotaV List other proposed measures,to reduce or control energy impacts. 1t any oi) ~ LfLdl e- ' : 1 7 ENYIROlMEHTAI. NEALTH a Are there any environmental health ha=ards. lrtcluding exposure to toxlc chemicals, rlsk ot flre and explosloe, spill, or ha:ardous waste, tAat could oaur as e result of thls proposal't It so, M eribe. ~ ~i - Pyrv ~'t~ Q.. ~ ~1 vYn~ ~ 11e (l) Descrlbe specra{ eaergency servlces tAat mlght be requlred ~ ~ SPOICA,NZ BNVfA0P7METfIAL ORDINIJtCE (VAC 197-11-960) Seeclon 11 10 230(1) • S L`tolROttlQTTIAL LL@KENTS (continued) Lvaluatioa Toc Elt{IIROMff`I:I1L HEALH (continued) Ageney v.e onlr (2) Proposed eeasures to reduee or conttol : lronmental healtb nasasds, •nr ALoAs _ P. ~ e Tioise (1) Vhac erpes oI nolse exiit i the area vhieh may atteet rous projnet (tor ex~asplet trattie. eoulpmeet. operatioo, other7 (2) Vhat cypes and levels of noise vould be eseated bp or assoeiated vith the Orojeet ea a short-tetm oT a loag-term baais (for exampl tratf e. cons5cuetion. o satioe+ ot r! Indieate E~Zura noise vould eome Erom the •itn ~fb~-YLl~(~-,~~1UY t~ 17n o ~ ~ frnQ21. PVbfYl ho~h ..l'yY)lDU f P r A il~ (7) Proposed measure to redvee or eontrol noise impaets, it any DI/~ J , . e uro Mru saoRELiae use a Vhsc is the eurTent use ot the •ite and adjaeent propecties! C,~ hxx.S r D lte• the sice beea used for agriculture' If ao, deseribe e DeaeriDe any structures on the site .iap ~ - • d Vill any •tructures be deoolished! II so. vhieb! ~ e Vhat is tAe eurcaec soniog classifieasioa oi the siteTL 0 , Z,!.~ Pr J t i1liac is the cuneat eeaprebeoaive pLn deslgnation ot the •itet ULLUrd g If applleable. vfut 1s the current shoreliae aastes program designation of the sitef a.'A b Nas aay parc the •ite peeo clsssified ae 'envirooaentallr •eositire' areat Ii @ot speei[Y n-{ i Appcosisaeely hov maoy oeople vould resids or vorlc in the eosplesed prejeett , spourn arvzaoHxeeizei. ai~ciNU+cE • ({JAC 191-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1) E EMIAOlRQttI1lL ELDMN?5 (concinued) Svalwtion Fos AgaaeT T Use OnlY ~ App[oxiartcly how eu►nY people would the ecmplssed ptoJeet dlspLcel M-0 n~ . k 4coposed oeasures to avoid or reduee displsement lspaets. it any ! 1 Ytoposed neasur to e•ute the sopos is tompatib e v thiezl tln aad pso eted Lnd as und Plana, it any • Ot - r A ~ u%l-rla j -&~n p _ s Nous tNc s Apptoximatelr hov ea unit• vould be peo~ dsd. ii anrf Indleate vi+ether hl`h-. oiddle-, ot loriereame howiag ~ t1 ~ [lr~ ~ ~ b Appro:imately hov ma unlts. if anr, vould De elisinatedf Iodiu te vhether high-. •iddle-, ot lowineome housing ~~Q~ c Yroposed saasucaa to seduee ot contiol ltousina ispaeta. !f any ~ 10 /►ESTtiETICS a What is the tallest 1►eight oi any pro0osed stcuetus ot ioeludi g~ tatannaet t I. !Ithe yriaeipal escerios buLldiag aaterial(s) proposcd! ~ m~ ~LL1 ~l~L~.le (At'.✓l'~ ` ~ Q ~ ~ ~ 7 f9S" b 1lhat vievs in the immediate vieLnitr vould be sltered or obstsuetedf OF-' _ dfi f ~ . e Yropossd aeasuses co reduee or eontrol aastl+etie ispaets. !t •nrs ~ Q.YP_ i r~ i-Q7 ~-►p_ 1,0- YiP t~~ ~ h ~ o.-T 4►ee sexak kv t%0 C'.'4-hr,k Fbsc _c. re i t 11 LICH: A.YD CIJIRH a •lhst type oE light or g L re vill t1u psopo"l prodvee? Sfisc tiae o[ day vauld !t mainlr oecurt Rep1f-.04 QMr\ Vyp'hidp s ' &wppi b Could light or g Lre froa tha [ioiohed pvojeet be a satec7 hazatd oc intecfece vith vievsi ~ ho . e 1ihat exirtiag otf-sice sources oi light oT a Lse aar aitaet Youtc proposalt d Yroposed vmsutes to reduee or toatsol Ligbt and gL re impaets, i[ aaya t OP A-hr 5o,m~t A)j . t'A.v ~ ~e - ' i SPOTJINE ai{TIROlilMNrAL ORDINW7CC (VAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11 10 230(1) ~a • • D. LNVIAO2aQRIAL BLEMZttiS (eoutioued) Evalw tion Yot 1lgeney O.e onlr 12 ItBCREATIOt1 Vhat dcsige►ated aad intormal recra tiooal opportunities •re in the immediate vieittitrTaml~ -.4i .3 &--JL ~ ao b Nould the ympa•ed projecc dispLee any existiog reercatioaal usest I[ no, deeesibe &/-ffe e Proposed measurns to reduce os eontsol lmpacts on secreatioo. aeluding saes tional ottuni- tie• to be provided b~► tAe Projeet or applicaat. 1i aays n(~ ~ r~ mYG . 13 itlS:'dRIC AND CVl.T1JRAL PRESERVATtON A. Are thesn any places or objeets listed oa or proposed fos aatiotul. statn or lotal Oresetva- tion segisters knovn to be on or oeut co the sitet if so. 6enerally desesibe I~ 7 b Cenecally daserlbe any laadmariu or evidnaee oE scotle arehaaologieal. r leatifie or cnltural lmportsnce 1anovn to be oa oc next co the slte L, ~ • ~ e Propooed seasuces to reduee or eoa[rol lopaets, it any 14 TT.A1iSY0R:ATIOH a Identiiy public street• aad highvay •trvina the sice at►d deieribe proponed access to the exisiiag •tseet •rssem Shov-on site platu. !t any ~'L~ av b Is •ite eurrantlr sarvad bp publ tsaositt i[ oot vhat i• tl+e pproxisat di ee t the 7~"~•s~-~`'~'L T'~~ ~~+~G~ 1 eearast tranAit stopf ~ . ALSMP.Y n ~l~ I~U ~ ST A (,/rr4y ~'Yll.~ . ~A ~ ~I.c~. .7'-e ~ q ~esr~~Ct,•~ e Ilov sanr patking spaees vould tAe eospleced psojaet hsve! Hov aseq vould the projeet nliadaate• : d Will zeaulre any aev road• or stseets. oc iwprovemnots to axistiag roads os stseets aoC ineludiag drivnvqs! IE so, geonzally dasteiDe (iodieate vl~nthac publie os pcivate) ~~Q G~~ ~y,~r,,,,rt~•t , ~.~.-nrf c~a.w.~-~l~~-~, ~ e Vill tha projeet vsa (o[ oeeue in tRa iosediate vleinitr ot) vater* cal1s or air teaeu poctatioat. It so, geaasally dnseribe. ~ 9 . , SP01U?t8 LtN'IaQt~NiAL OR~INANR ~ (1lAC 197-11-960) Seccton 11 10 230(1) s LfN2ROltKEtt':'AL EI.F1MltTS (eoctinwed) LYaluacioa Por Ilgeaey Osa Oa1r [ Aov mwnr vehicul►. trip• per day~d be ~eAe~~~~b~he~jpl~e$~pOro eett I( Iwova. Lndiuce vhen peak vould oecur g Propoied measuree co reduce or tontrol transportatioa inpaets, i[ any r VJZ~ 1'Q'c Lo QP~ 15 PUdLIC SERVICES a Would the ptojeet result in an tnereared oeed tor puDlie oervicen (tor esasple. ire psotectioa, pot:ce pro:escion. health eare. •chools, otRer)2 It so. SeRecally deseslbe , b Proposed neasures to reduee or eantrol diteet impaeto on publie •srvices, any 1-LJ1,-fto c- T~----awlq - 26 IT:ILI:IES a C e uti ie turtentlr avai L ble •c the site Clectricity aatural 9-1 Er efuse ervie~ elephoo , saaitary •evet. reptlc ayscera. othe b Describe the utilicies that are proposed for the projeec, the utility pTOViding the setvlee aad the geaera constsuctiofi se~vitiesn ~ titr or !n the is diate icy Ivhieh mLgh~j be needed ~e~1~1~ 1 v - rn ~~~r rr) L~ _ T~ - va.ufq . qt ,c70_te'- ~~rr~ tr ~'G{ , ~CIJS = C SICtiATqRB t 1. Nu undersigned. svei r under the penRlty of perjurp that the aDove rstpoeu es are oadn truchtully aad to the bess ot mr kaovledge. I also undnsscaad cTut, •tiould there be sny villful miereprementatioa or villlul Lck ot full dieelosure oa ay part. the a ee eay vleRdrav aay determieu tioa ot noeuignifieaaee chat it might issue !n telianee upop thia cl+eckliat Date ~ Propocert ~ Q ( r 0 ^~~~r U l/ t 4~ / (Pleue Arint or 'LyPe) r ~ Proponent / / • Addreaa rv ~ ~ /V (Signac ) ~ r Phone 4 ~.Jz s~ ! / ~ Pecwn coapletieg fosms Oatns P,one 5-0 ^ 12 G~ ~ 33 TOR STAYT OSS ONLT Staft member(s) tevieg eheeklisc ~ . - i Sssed h1• •tafl reviev ot the environmental ehnekliee and othes pertinene informacloo, the statf A Conelude@ chst there are no probable •l6aitieaat adverse lmpaets aod teeomsaodr a detenaloation ot aoasisniticaaee 6 Coneludes that probaDle sigeilieant adve[se earisonmental lapaec• do exist [or the eurrent propos4l and teeovoeods • dClEated detet- aieatioa o[ eom ignifieaoea vith eoedLtions C Concludes chat chere are pcobapie oignitieaut adverse eovironmeocal lmpacts aod reeoemend@ a deteevioatioo ot aiaaltiuoce TILIHC YLE - 05 00 w t p ~ l , ~ t2 ! . ~ ~ ~ P_~ OIrC~- ~ ~ . , Ih e are su , ~ I ~ ~ . . _ ~ . , C. L ` r~ ~ ~ e a 1~ a o+r ~r ou~~1c en ~ 5 t w~c ~ n a arce 5 ti ~n u . `I ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~i ~~r~'.~~ _ ~ ~ _ . us. ~ ~ r___-~_.~ , ~ . ~~1 ~ O ru~ r. ~ Jrr~~y4,y '.r '}.e- . . _ . _ _ . ~ ~r.~ / ~ 2x~ _ - -,~y- - ~r ' 4 f~ o - 3~3 - . . . . ~ - ~ ► ~ ~ 7s~ . -1, ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ , T ~ o. ~ ~ I ~i ! I ~ , y, ~ ~ , ~ I r r ~ Ip I ~ ti j`' . ~ ti , , , t i , i ~ . ~ M~L~ . I . V 4.~... ~ { , I . ti ~r~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ " G7 f . . _ I i5 ` I ~ R►--- o , r w I ~ I - _ t i ~ ~ ~ - - y ~ . ~ `-i~. - ~ % ~ y~ ~ ~ . y ~ '„a ~ - = f y _ 4 ~ I r ~3 _ ,I ~ ~ I p ~ _ ~ - , "J ~ ✓ . , _ ~ I ~3 ~ ~ h h ~ I - - f ~ ~ ~5~1 ~ re i % _ ' 4 ~ - ~ h ° i - I ~ , , ~ ry ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ fv L~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ ` f ' I ~ , ~ • ~ 0 1 ~ - l I ~ ~ ~ . ~ , , ~ I ~ ~ f I + ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ .~.i. . ~ .w~. a . , , . . , . . . . . ~ . . r . . . ^ . , ~ ~ + . _ e_ ~ ~i ~ , i~► ✓E , d i + ' ~ ' . ~ ~ . ~ 'r ~ ~ ~ i , / f~',f ~ ~ , r ~ I l.J ~ ~ ~ 1~Cr+ ~ t ~ • ~ ~ I ~ ~~i~ ~ 1 ~1 / ~ ! 'flr - l0 / ~ 0' r ~ ~ ~ ~ a a 9 II~ ~ f I ~3 4 . ' 1:~ N . _ - 1~ E5 ~ , : a~o 6~ ~ b . ~i~ 1 ~ AV~ ~ ~ u " - ~ ~ oX _ ~ ~ G ~ r M 3~~ ~ l 9~• r~ l~ ^ t ~1 ~ i ~ ~k U ~ ' _ T ~ i- /33 . ~ ~ r ,,,uc << , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 • ~ . r-~,,'~,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ :0 ~ ~ 1~ i~, a ~ , Z ~ ~ i ; ~ z ~ , 9 1.~. . . , ~ ' , . ~ ~ ~ ~ , r ~ , , ~1 3 , y ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ *1 c,,~ - w_J - - - ~ ~ ~ Vj~+ ~o~ -1~ 6s~ ~ vr - _ " _r _ ~•,r ~ _ _ - - - - _ M,i , ~ ~r:~-' i! ~ ' . G~ . _ . - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - ~ _ _ ~ 1 ~ _~L t w L_~ i ~ Cc. , ti . I ~ - - - ~ . 4- ~ ~ i r . ~ a , I ~ ti t i ~ 'L~ . V r ~ ' ~V ~ f > ~ +~p, ~ h . C~ ~i~ ~ Sj ~ ~ ~ L~ ~r aw(~ ~ ~,p " I J ~ I , ~ i I . ~a ~ `~1~~a ~ ~ I r ~ ~ ' i . ~ ~ , ~ ` I ' , ~ y ~ ti + ~ i ~ , ~ a r~r l~ ~ ) ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,a - r `t \ ^ ~ t y ie 7!d d ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' V ~ 1 ~I a' . r 9 ~ , c' . . 1 ` 'r ~ ~ I II ~ ~ . • I ~ ~Y 9 V ~ 40 41 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` { I 6 I V ' ~ I d ~ 9! ~ ~ . , ~ ~ . I ! ~ . ~ I - ~ o C'~ ~ ~ i , ~ ° ~ ~SO~ rr~ ° _ ~ ~ ~ # ~J ~r ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,b F, ~ •5, ' I ` i • M 9 642.79' ~ • a . . ~ ~ °I ~ ' p . ~~o. - - ~ - ~ ,a ' i n ~ b~ ~s,id 7S r•, 7"b ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ , w d ~QB.IJ ' 4 ~ I , h „ ~ -1 ~ - ~ 7 , ~ W ~ , _ ~0 nl • ~ ~ r ~ ~ • ,S' . 7 ~ ~ r; ~ " ~i v r, 4 ~ ~ . / , ~ , ~ n J . ; r . . ~I ~ - I 4 ~L~ ~ ~ . _ - w _ ~ , ~ ~ /~a~ ~ - j _2 ~ f . , Q : : ~ ~I ~ r 1~ p ~ 9 , eb ~ AI . f 4Jl 1 n ~ . ' . ~ .~ao / i~i f . Zy ~ ~ ~ . . r...-..r ..a~ 4.i. ~ _ . h( ~ 7/ . ~Y~J lQ.~ ~ I ~ I r~ ~ ~ . ~ 11, r ~ ~ iro I . . I w e' 'e No. ZE-93-81 ~ - ~ D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main- tenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted for the project prior to release of building permits. 2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be per- mitted, inciuding, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and generai aliowable uses of the permitted ione. All variations must • conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The originai intent of the develop- ment plans shal I be maintained. 3. Applicant shall comply with 1208' recommendations concerning storm- water runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. ~ 4. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commis- sioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on-site improvements. 5. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA Guide- tines (WAC 197-10) and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO), a proposed declaration of non-significance has been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the official file, written comments and/or public testimony contain information regarding assess- ment of the proposal's adverse impacts to the physical environment; a finding is hereby made that no potentially significant adverse impacts upon the physical environment are anticipated as a result of the project; and a final declaration of non-significance is hereby to be i ssued . b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and pave to the exist- ing pavement adjacent to the property on Knox Avenue. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. 3. The appl icant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health Oistrict a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposaf plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. 2 'e No. ZE-93-81 a K . • • b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 4. A parking plan and traffic circu{ation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrange- ment of parking stalis shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, wiil be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. 6. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 7. AI{ required improvements shall conform t4 the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, and other appiicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Storm- 'tivater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 8. At the time that Felts Road is improved the applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Felts Road and a 20 foot radius on Felts Road and Knox Avenue for right-of-way. The applicant shall aiso be a witling participant in the formation of a Road improvement District (R I D)for the construction of Felts Road. At the time of construction of Felts Road the applicant shall relocate his drive- way that is shown on the east edge of his property. c) COUNTY UTI LIT! ES DEPARTMENT 1. Pursuant to 6oard of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on comptiance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2. The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility tocal improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any {egal assessments for any utility local im- provement district (UL1D) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. 3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. . 4. Each building shall be double plumbed for connection to future areawide collection system. 3 w ~ 'e Na. ZE-93-81 ~ • a • , s d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utitities, Spokane County. - 2. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health C3fficer, the use of an individual on-site sewage system may be authorized. 3. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utjlities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shali be by an' existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 5. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. P. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY QEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Recommend approvai with condition that prior to development of this property that an engineered water distribution system pian shaif be submitted to the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. This distribution ptan shall include water main size, fiows, iocations, fire hydrant type and {ocations, water storage tanks size, and location and design criteria. f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. The site Es located within the boundaries of the Modern Electric Water Company. Satisfactory arrangements for water delivery have not yet been made. g) SPOKANE VALLEY FI RE DEPARTMENT 1. That mains and hydrants are needed in the area. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the buitding shatl be appraved prior to building permit issuance. 4 'e No. Z,5-93-81 , f ~ f ,E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner- Committee,, p,ursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the appi,ication of Max Spalding, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Motion by: Williams `Seconded by: Carstens Vote: Unanimous to Approve ( 3- 0) HE'A G eXAMINER, COMMITTEE air , ~ ~ . 7'~-Z! ~I' f fG ~ , YATT EST : WALLIS D. HUBBARD Ptanning Director By. . . Date : 'S 1 'r ~ c~ `~9~1 ~~1 ~ i ✓ . . tx " 4 ~~R 10 1995 ' ~ ~ r ° d AVE COUWTY °if EPARTMENT SpOHAN$ COONTY PLANNI111(i COMMI3SIDN EMpIRE 1551 EXT 255 ~ . , ro ~ DN ~ - , tSPOKANC COUNTY COURT HOUSE April 289 1954 Nt'• Dolph Spalding B. 2019 Sprague Avaaue . 9pokene, waehiagtoa Dear Mr. 9paldings 8eference ie me.de to your requeet for information pertQining to the effeot it will have on the uee of your property on phtch ie located a wrecking and av.to junk yard. dccording to the County Zoafag Ordinaace e, junk yard may aot be establiehed witbia two hundred aad fifty feet of a State Highway or ma.jor connty road and bhe yard muet be protected by a sight obeuring fence or plaaating strip. Yon establiehed yonr yard approuime.tely fifteen yeerB r•?± and your operation wae establiahed in acoor8aace aith the then eaieting regulatione. The require-- meAt of a aigbt-obecuring berrior was passed aftecr the eetablishment of your yard end ie aot retroaotive. The Highway Department ie now aonetructing e highway~neat to yonr groperty. You ao;Fiaa iadivfdaal have no coatrol over the re-locatioa of thie Stai Higbwey. For thie reaeon y+ou aill not be roquired to move your establiebmeut or to comply with regalatione not applicable Prior to the relocatioa of the highxey. ' Oordially youre. . JOnathaa B. Cunningham U P].eaning Diseotor r J$Clhw , s / - r► • . No . 76 334 BEFORE THE 80ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SFOKANE COUNTY• WASHINGTON ZE-84-75 ) ~ IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZQNING ) MAP FROM AGRYCULTURAL TO RESTRICTED ) R E 3 O L U T I O N INDUBTRIAL QN PROPERTY LOCA?ED IN ) BECTION 8, TOWNB#iP aS N. , RANGE 44. ) E.W.M. , SPOKANE COVNT7C, ~ WA$IRI111CaTQN9 ) The above-enwtlad matter cominQ on requlacly for hearing before the Board of County Commiselonen og Spokane Cmurity, Waahinqton, on thiv day, aad !t appeariag to the Board that the 8pokane County PlanninQ Commission has Qiven dus notice of the heaft9 on the taattet iA the rnanner and tor the time providecl by law; that eaid P1annir9 Gotamiaelon bae held a public heerlnQ ae required= and that the esid , planninv CQrairission r•oncuco in the plan to sone the followinQ deaacibod properiy 44_ RESTRIG?ED INDUS?RiALs Tbe S 1/2 of the 14int 200 faet of the Went 360 feet of 81ock 252 of Oppostmity in Section e, Tomehip 03 N.. Ranga 44 , E.W.M., Spokane County, Waehington. NOW# THEttEFORB, U 1'r RE80LYFD, tbat the abovs-desctibed ptopwty be, and the $aeae io xoned wnder the alaosificatior of REBTRiCTED INDUSTRIAL 8a defined in tho Zoninq QniuaACe ot Spokane Coun ty, adoptad August 25, 1953, ae amended. AIJD FURTHFJt $E IT RESOLVED that any development on the above-desc:tibed ` propetty sball be subioat to the follawinq amditionss . 1) Improvemerit to fCnox Avenue adJoinlnQ the advectieed property to Spokano County standarde. Improvanients iphall include drainaqe aontcol, cucb, and asphdlt peving to exieting oil• t a,' 2) Accase perniite for the proieat shall be obteined fcom the Spokane Cownty •Enqineer'$ Oftir.o prior to releae• of buildinq pecmits. Usnta: The County Engineec's Office contomplatee wideninq of cucb drope~ to 301 and paved appr+oachea. 3) Approval by the 8oard of County Commieeioners of erevieod development plan orientinq the buildinq alonQ the waet partion of the ptopecty witb ioifding doore and aecose driveways siitueted elanq the eest eid• oi the building. $uch p14n shall incotporats paved aaceaa, psrlciaq and loadin9 arees and landacapinq elonq the woet and ooutls periraetece. Elevation sketchea of the proposed buildtng ehall accompsny tho cavieed pians. , . 4) Finml laridacape and liqhtinq plane ehall be approved by the Director of ' $latusinq prior to celeaee af buildinQ pecmite for the ptoiect. 5) All siQs1s ahall bs mounted ilat againet the buildinq except for a free- etatidinv sign in the front yard area not exceedinq 45 square feet i» area or 5 feet $a height. - , - ~ (contd. ) 1 SP4KANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT , APPLICATIONS BEFORE''HE Z.bNINC AD TUSTOR I:t pc.L'c.~'~' tT~t PJS`~'~~` Name of Applicant: JVI nx STV-1 A' iinq - gent: Y (~D Strreet Address: AI` 2-2.IQ r' a~ 'RJ. Zip Phone - Home: City• Scinic P State: WA- Code: Q°1.;20/6 Work• a 2W -3?00 Agent's No • . Name of Properry Owner(s): ^i Street Address• ~ 2UMh Z.Ip hone - Home: City: State: Code: Q6i2j, Work: a~_ H- 33L REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action): ariance~ Condidonal Use Pernut Expansion of a er~ Nonconforming Use FOR STAFF USE ONLY , V ioladon/ Sectioq ~ Township Z~ Range, y Y EnfoTCement: Y ~ N, •Fire Distnct• I -CWWP sewer purveyor _ ` r ~,4 •CWSP water purveyorc t_r--C Li -CUP standards meL Y N'N •Existing zone _4~- ~ °Cite applicable secoon; ~P~O5; e •Comp. Plan designauon: 4AMwkqd- •Artenal Road Plan designauon: 4tive °Cntical Areas• Wedands ; Habitat Geologic / ; Aqu,fer / , andJor Flooding~ / •Lot, legal & add'1 ownership checked by: ~ •Person doing preapp conf f~ •Other/previous Planning Department actions involving ihis property:_ ~-177 5J, SEPA complete apphcation date; yL4L9~ ` -Certificate of Exempdon No.: A licadon No• . t'~ 9 sVl pp •Heanng Date: •Vanance site plan dimensions checked by; `tk-P ~p ?~9 ABOUT THE PROPERTY (by applicant) Q. -Existing use of property• vaca~t •Describe proposed use of the property, noting chanize from'existing use'; ,tAYA We ~\1~, s-~ri, ~ or~ vxo~ Uctc.a~- 1-c~ •If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance soueht in comnarable terms (i.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet): __j A. ~qc~ ( We A~Q SQ'[k1 ~~6~ "RS lS~~ Si~nfi Lb Ca' h~'_(Li,,lr.t '~5k ~i ,,,~Yti►'f t~tCYrACYS V( iS~i7q eK-s'+ IV ±L,u~' 14c.s ~a►~,~. ~D I~l~~~ rt t?c '1~rt,~.a~►'~`Rn~~-~c. t~` ,~5 lar o,~1.;1~ i- a r.r}z~ - •If a conditional use pemut application, dces propos meet ail standards? If not, has one or mare variances been requested? N •What is the size of the subject property. tl acres •Street address of property (if known): N• =l6 Q` , ~!c •Le al descri tion of include easement, if a h): = r ~ Prol~Y Co~t , ol - ~ 3 ~ - c ~3 • 1 ~ ~ f ~ ~ r (-Ettg.(_ W41L#4 }ss~c~arE~ I~C Vr r /13 •Parcel No(s).: NSD84.0)12 - A/Q2dqJ •Source of legal: &essov-s ~rP *Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this awner, sponsor and/or agent: .14-A •What interest do you (applicant) hold in the properiy? _JDQ~/,, ~ . STATE OF WASMNGPON ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) I SWF.AR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERIURY, THAT• (1) I AM'CM OWNER OF RECORD OR AVI'HORIZED AOENT POR THE PROPOSED SITE. (2) IF NO? THE OWNER, Wlt1TlEN PERMISSION FROM OWNER AUTHOW2INC3 MY ACTIONS ON HIS/FiFR BEHALF IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOYE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTiNG DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO7HEBEST OF MY KNOWLED(3E ~ signea ` ~ • • C Notary~ubli d for the state of gwresiQ~n~ . ~ My at po~tment~~.~eyes'~'" 7 ~ • t Vr• ~ ,4 PaBe 1 of 2 i98~ 0$ HD/ZA APP (REV I2194) ~~~''~~i~'~SIYINdtd~~~'• . ~ ~ ` ~ ( A. BURDEN OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant) It is necessary fvr the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argwment in favor of approving the application. Accondingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return it with your application B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES (applicant must visit each agency whose no. is circled below) SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT JZ a) Proposed method of water supply: _ Mzkni-E <<.lail b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: scozr A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has b~n informed wi Planning Department Y N of r uirements an tand . We reque~consF ~ Dq ~ (Sig n{D(Sign-off Waived) SPOKAN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (Engi ering & oa s Division),, A prelimin consul do been held to `scuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requu~em ts ards. We reque consultation with Planning Department Y N (Si&ature) ~ (Date) (Sign-off Waived) 3 SPQKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Deparnnent may waive if outside WWMA) A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requiremen,ts and standards. . ~ ~ . I ~~ture atO (Sign-off Waived by Planning?) ( ~ ) (D The applicant is required to cliscuss the proposal with to become infarmed of water system requirements and standards. (See #a below) The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of sewage disposal req,uirements and standards. (See #b below) a. WATER PURVEYOR: Mo&exr The proposal islis not located within the boundary of our future service area.` ~ 2) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our current district. 3) We are/hre t able to serve this site with adequate water. 4) Sadsfactory airangements have/have not been made to serve this proposal. (Signature) (Date) ~ b . SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: , A preliminary consultadon has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been of require-nen d s vdards. info )W=J - A ignature) ' ate) . • page 2 of ~ ~ H1~r~A APP (REV 12194) 1 1 7~ • VARIANCE BURDEN OF PROOF FORM Name: S1, G ~ F'~le Number. (,1ff - C) - 12 A"variance" is the means by which an adjustment is made in the application of the specific regulations of the zoning classification for a pazticular (the subject) piece of property. This property, because of specialcircumstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges conamonly enjoyed by other properttes in the vicuuty and in a sunilar zone classification. Tlus adjustment remedies the difference in privileges. A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in the zone classification in which the property is located. The following questions will help to determine the outcome of your request Your request reqiures accurate and complete responses. First circle either the "yes" or the "no" a.nswer(s) following the questions below as they apply to your situation and then explain as needed (in the space provided) to make your unique situation clear. C'ertain phrases from the Zoning Code of Spokane County section on variances are included in these questions and are underlined for convenience. A Will this variance pemut a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? Yes On') Explain:t"f eG/L,Iv~ yQ/ds, o!t cdfCYUtl fA; 1--2 7 rrJC't W f-4 I[,.~Nrl-IC1f~l~ (A,5e Pe t m, t, we p r.PcS~e l~'c S; ~ ~t t c9b sc k r, v~ t-e a c e ~ 7, ~ Z T~ f Q'~C B. Are there svecial. circumstances (lot size, shape, topography, location, access, suiroundi.ngs, etc.) which apply to the subject pmperty and which may not apply to other pmperties in the 'v~cini ? l~~ ~e, No EXp111n: r. ck+k &~,amarjw r~tj plfrrG ~crc JJ5 fitPC~s ,Ear1c' Il~or"'t'~^ l .~g G.~ te~K PrcfeM-~' 6 C~Id2~' N~vVRr "~kNc:K p0~~5 Gccr •o ~r+~ t jag~ n'~rI C. Is the subject property deRrived of nrivileQe,^ commonlvTe4j,oXed by other ' in the yvpinita and in asimilar tione classificatiori? Yes Explain: Or e<~ CLie,4S 40 PG 5t 4- Ci crc..ss emT ,r fo f4~ ~ Nor4 . D. Will this variance be ha.nnful to the public welfare or to other properrties in the 'C and a;imilar zone classfflcation? Yes 10 . Explau~►: Oort~• ~Eo„~ ~ eJs~ LJ ~ So c~ ~ t' s~ ee ~.~,r<< y- I r .~Jes+ ~s h~~ss~c d~,~~r •~r-~~C~~fs ¢ lY~c der vC~ec-#r, c f'~~..~c,Ljf f E Are there other similar situati s in the 'vifty in a is mla' r zoneclassification? Y~ Na Are they penmitted uses? lYeV No Are they "nonconfonni.ng"_ uses? es> No Explain: (e c~; ~s~ ya d ~ '~o f ~ F. Could the subject property be put to a reasonable and permitted use by you or r person without the requested variance? Yes No i 2 Explain: V.--C4.L1 4:~~L ~ / G. If this request is gianted, will the subject property be more environmentally sensitive, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic propertO,~ No Explaij.r ai~ e c + {,d, 1 ~ C~ jlaw -1-ke ro /Ie ,r 4.4 iV o ~ ft,~ a+e r ct(s s u C- k C• S , Gtat.~~ee,~ -t- d~el~ ~ Page 1 of 2 1 , ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ e ~ H If this variance is granted, will the braader pubhc need or interest be served.? (Yes) No ~ ~ . le s i,~ . ~ ~ o e d i $,~o s ~ed ci P r~r fe ~ ~ Ex lain: U v L P / I. VV"il1 this variance be mconsistent with the purpose of the zonmg which applies to e sub`ect ? J P'~P~Y Explain:.P t` c i ~ x R s f.s t-~ Von r- t-4- 4- c{ t 7. Will approval of this variance grant to the subject prvperty the privileges of a ciifferent classificatton (in other words would this be a"de facto" zone change)? Yes Na ExP ~ las'n:ILV- tL-o-(- b--:~ )J e rse/ v I c. ~ cA- j, CL-C r.a Cl~ c a.. eA-s- e i); e[.1 i s Ct I 1' c~ i~~ S-C _ ~ K Wi11 this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent af the Comgrehensive P1an? Y'es Explain:,'D- ~,ti- 09 .1-- ix v CL- Wf 2 Gkr+js ya T U t,~ (A- ~ A C 0 N ri . t- l~~ a l .{,k 5-'r- e f /rt f" . L. Is this variance required for a reasonable ecanomic return from the subject P~P'~riY Qr i ' Yes No Explain.: ILr' ; S a~- t~~ r''t' r~., c~ s C._ M. Di,d the Mctical difficalV which caused you to apply far this variance exist - befare you awned the subject property? Yes (No) Explain: "-k e_ 0 rr) bIF rr^- a u r pro,p.er + y ` ezzC-C Gt l`~i ~ro^ A--~ ok„ ja f a c asy r..i 4'k ~'i r-c; u. ,u c) e. , ft ~ f + N If approved, weuld this variance affect land use density regulations whzch exist - w Itect the RathdrumlSpakane Aquiferr? Yes m~ ~~p Fxplain:.A)a+ ai es ,d~e ~ "k~ J42tXICrA A/-J~ , The fvllowing space is for further explauati4n. Attach an adcv.tional page(s) if needed. You are invited to present additional photographs, eiiagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of this apphcativn. We have the equxpment to display video tapes. No such additional matenal is reqwred and in any case it must 6e BRIF.F and descriptive of issues which need ta be considered in relativn ta thYS requesteti variance. If you have questions about the procedure to be fallowed feel free to contact the Spokane Caunty Planning I]eparmaent at 456-2205. xp.vARLANcg, auPMFx oF MooF FoRM Page 2 of 2 REv, sM , SPOKANE OOUNTY PLANNING DE.PARTNENT TC"Vfln % ~ £ Name of APPlicant: -f"^ax 5FaAu~ %v,% ~Agent: YW Smeet Address: i 2210 u' emK4 %k Z'ip Phone - Hrnne: City: 5PoXa►~r State: Code: qq%Q6 Work: 612.N -3 3W Agent's No.: Name of Property Owner(s): M o\X a?A\C\ i a Street Add1'eSS: i~~ 2,210 l,Inivevns-~}'v • Zip Phone - Home: City: State: Code: NX6 Work: _q2q-3vM REQUESTED ACITON(S) (Circle appropriate action): Variance(s) rConditional Use Pennit~ ) Expansion of a pthert " Nonconfvrming Use FOR STAFF USE ONLY Violadon/ Sectioii 9 Township L°~ RangPe y~ EnE'oncemenC Y N •F'ire DistaicC t •CWWP sewer purveyor: _ 04 •CWSP water purveyor: .,~~41 E L~c.~&CUP standards meC Y CD~ NA v~ i'~ N •Eusting zone: T' r,_. °Cite appllcable sectionf ~ G3 2 aeComp. Plan designation: ~ •Artenal Road Plan designation: 1eiuo)( - z-oc~L. A cc ers 5 °Critical Areas: Wedands/ ; Habitat Geologic ; AquiferZ,- and/or Flooding/ ~ ~ •Lot, legal & add'1 ownership checked by: G-C') •Person doing preapp conf. Ii •Other/previous Planning Department actions involving this property _'Za -1? 7-5 5 142 - t~ ?~t L. ,~,g SEPA complete sppLcation dat,e; ~/~Lp43>' ~ G •Certificate of Exemption No • Applicaeon No : _<::i1E vL _ 9 - ~ ~ •Hearing I?ate• ,1 9~-~ `5 ~Vaco p18n dimensiQns checked by;, J:tt ' ~j ► 2 AB UT THE PR TY b a Iicant Y PP ) •Existing use of property: YOlGdln'r •Describe proposed use of the rroperty, noting change from'existine use': ° We w :%J1 br ~'~ari ~r►cf ~ le~r,,: c~e s Ac~~ ~►L~ c!~ ~~..~1 •If a variance application, state the Code standand and describe the variance sought in comparable terms (i.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet): •If a condidonal use pernut application, dces proposal meet all standards? ~ N If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y N •What is the sitie of the subject property. 4LaLws , •Street address of property (if known): 2 UK;VLrS ` . •Legal description of property (include easement, if appliable): ~ •Parcel No(s).: 115084.011 , ~ aao~N o 0113 •Source of legal: c r *Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: -%ar.Ks ag •What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? JChdLYf% ° ~ I'~S►T£OF WRSIM4G'= i SS COUNI'Y OF SPUKANB ) I SWEAR, UNDER PFNALTY OF PER7URY, THAT (1) I AM'IHE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUMORI7ED AGENT IIOR THE PROPOSED SrIE; (2) IF NOrf 'IHE OWNER, WR1TlEN PERNQSSION FROM OWNBR ALITHORTIaICi MY ACITONS ON HIS/fM BEHALF IS ATTACHED; ANU (3) ALL OF THE ABOVB RESPONSFS AND 7HOSE ON SUPPORTiNG DOCUMEYYTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND'PO'THE BEST OF MY ICN+OWLEDC3E ~ Stgned C Da~e CL ` ~ ` ;/Zoo~( ~ULI ! Notary ~c in and for ffie state of Washmgton, residmg ~y E]o••C~'~'•~ . ~ My appomtmcnt expires _ = ; = tn '~o,~ t ° : ~ - . ~ ~44 l.- t ~ page 1 of 2 ~ ~ c~r t~s7~ ~••~i, HD%LA APP (REV 12J94) 11~•~f,~1 1; . ~i~r i i ~ 6 A. BURDEN OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant) It is necessary for the apphcant or hisJher representaave to establish the reasons why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor of approving the application. Accondingly, you should 6ave been given a fonm for your requested action (variance, condidonal use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the farm out and return it with your applicadon. B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES (applicant must visit each agency whose no. is circled below) ~r ~ 1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT YO Proposed method of water supply: ~CAY TC b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: 5ef-i+ ~ey~hn • A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant h n informed t c~nsultation 'th lanning Department Y N of req ' ments and standardlZreques ~ C// ~Si (Date) Sign-off Waived) gna OSPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (E gineering & Roads Division) A p =nts co tati n been held to di uss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of eq dands. We est sultadon with Planning Department Y N W ' 4; 1pSh~) (Date) 1i gn-off W11Ved) OSPOKANE COUNTY iJTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waide if outside WWMA) A preliminary consultadon has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. 5- - 0 . (Sign ~ atur~e (Datre) (Sign-off Waived by Plantung?) The applicant is required tio discuss the proposal with to become informed of water system requirements and standards. (See #a below) The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of sewage disposal requirements and standards. (See #b below) a. WATER PURVEYOR: tAoro . Tlie proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our future service area. 2) The proposal is/i_.'s not locaxed within the boundary of our cuirent districL 3) We able to serve this site with adequate water. 4) S' actory rpementus been made to serve this proposal. ~ - (Si e) (Date) , . SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: - d A pre 'liminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been inform of requiremen d stand igna ) (Da:%3-5 e) ~ page 2 of 2 HD/LA APP (EtEV. 12444) ~ C4NDITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FORM Nane: -~5?AL- Or tJc-~ File: ,/_vF- - ~ - J V CONDI'I'IONAL USES State Law, Section 36.70.020 (7), clarifies that the County regulaaons must specify the standards and criteria that shall be applied in the review by the Zoning Adjustor. Addidonally, condition of approval may be added to assure compatibility with other uses in the same zone. A. Assuming the proposal is listed as a"permitted" conditional use, do you believe the proposal meets all of the required, established and applicable standards? ~ B. If you cannot meet the conditional uses required standands, amypu seeking relief by applying for an aciministrative excepdon or a Variance? Yes (Circle One) C. What have you done or could you do to: 1 Make the use vompatible with other pernnitted activities in the same vicinity or zone? . al ~ ~ A-0 tlne uacj~x ava E4,si-t ul ~ I 1 1-1 ~e Wiii~ ' w e- • 2. Ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities? Vse cLk \1)eAc a-\ Seeur- • D. Explain how or why the proposal will not be detrimental to: 1. The Comprehensive Plan: I lkc C4og- n `s at i~ 12 "4tn~rD` , a1A wKtJL ~ld►A T1~~ wl1Ui i1 ~c~4•r~i~i7vc~` r)Se>crtn.' 1• ; and 2. Surnounding propeity: To Itiut~t.,1 r as+ i s e~ I-AL1~,ca~~►v-o~ . ; c, mc1 Q r- r~~~., ~r•t~ u►,es~- ~ S carAak6- hntigne c.li-c R~ . . E What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent (health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Code ANIZ mitigate any adverse effect upon the neighboring properties including but not limited to: 1) time linuts; 2) front, side or rear yard greater than minimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing, 5) off-street parking; and 6) others? " `a~ s arc c~ k w~G.d [cc~e 1.aw►:~ ~'o t~ ro~~'~,,~,,r~.s.. More ~aw► 10°/b OT ORL~rk~~,C a.1r[s~. u,~~~ bc ~nk~sc..av~ r ey=r~ ~~rrr~~. ZCv%G Svlr~rrivln(~D1roTr bL~a~~ - - --a, WOe►tk;v.e SL ~.1P!_ 1ra1 tnrA e►wA Wa. d.re r~w.nns:.,~1 ZA . J:T1, '~~t ~l6►l 1~/ ~o e1P-0 -~o km (a o S'Otif. F.~lu CLtS3,/ GutP ~S 1V VjAmx We %ne..re ~o►1KcA Ua►k-~% AUr v.r:n4.b~,r5 Q«S R . [ev►tarn eur :Arp- ,,s.b k1j 1nb me rneel .4,& ke.~ati~..~, '~he ~S'T Av~ t+~\~~T Irt~P55QM~"~_ b~1r a►dl~i'Tiar~e~1 ~t~~~~Ste►~in ~ Gir 21 C►1~t [3~ SG~s1~+ i t~. N~~a) SO►w heeCCSCLV*J e ^ ~~e C X : b L'~ O►AD1rr ~ t~[~ l QSi r e~pM- t . Cl.'F BL'RDLN OF PR00F FORM REV, 1/91 Y April 7, 1995 To Whom It Mey Concern; We, Russell end Jody Spelding, da hereby euthori2e ' Max Spelding ta sign in aur behelf eny dacuments perteining to the canditic3nel tise permit pracess far Nrecking yard expansion for Spelding Auto Parts, Inc. f - - 7 r Russel2 D. Speldi g Date , . • /00-~S o y S eldin Dete Subscr ed and swo~ me th3 s / D dey of 4AJ 1995 $ ~ F i ~ Notery Public in 9nd~~f~ldeL~q.~tjte of Weshington, residing et ~e o;• ~e~` 01 ~~~lllti111~~~ • ~ To whom it may concern, I do hear by authorize Mr. Dewight Hume to help represent me in the application of a conditional use permit, #CUW895, and a variance for use of land, #VE995. Russell D. S aldin P 9 ~ • Date. / Notary 1~ ~•C D a t e ~1~cttuii►r~►,,,~ JUL ••'p~YISS,O~.p~~~,~ %G G~ r f kOl ~b > ~ ~/f ll! 111111~~ ~ • ~ , qr~ ad 0 '.,TION. R SCREENa LEGL USERIDo IhID CHANGE-REASON: _ -w_-__-__-__-__-____-_-__-___-.._-___--_-______--_____----_---___-_-_________ L.EGAL AESCRI P'T S OPI ~ _ _ JUR I SD I CT I 0N= 11 RDLL= FC PARCEL= 45084 e c.~ 11 ^ YEAR= 96 FAGE= 2 ~ L1NE DESCRIPTION - 1 14 OPPORTUfU I TY N1/2 B268 E X C W30OFT & E XC WWY ; ~ 3- 4- 5- 6- 8- 9- ~-j_ 1-- ^--*L.O09 HEADER CI-IAhIGE GT I Oh! o R SCrEEN: LEGL USERI D o ING CHANGE-REASON: _ -__w-_________________________---____-___-_q_______--_-_____-__-_-_._ LEGAL DESCRIPTION ----w.r..r-w r--...r--r-r-.rrr...---.w....r....w--...--r-r-.....+wwww.wr-r.....r--w....-rr---.+r--w.-w-r~-- JUR I SD I CT x ON= 11 Rt]LL= RE F'ARCEL= 45084.0113 ` YEAR= 96 FAGE= i . , LINE DESCRI PT ION _ =w ________-__-__-___-.~--_______-_-___-w___-______-________-___ -1. 1 10 OPFORTUht x TY W30OFT OF ht i/2 OF Fs268 EXC HWY 12_- 0 - ,4w )5_ ,6..... , ~ , g a9- 0-- 1- 2- s?-*L009 MEADCR CHANGE )CT S ON d R SCREEN: LEGL USER I D e IND CHANGE-REAS4hl: LEGAL DESCRI PT I 0N _ _----___w-___-____-____ J U~'~ x"`- A I CT I0N= 11 FiG]I...L= r'E PAFiCEL = 45084.0108 YEAR = 96 F'AGE= I l.. INE AESCRI FT I 0N Q-- 1 10 OF'F'ORTUrU I TY E XC NWY B^69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - )2- 13Y M-- )5- )b-- )q_ 1 o-- 1 1-- ! 2- )?-*L009 I-IEADER CMAAlGE ~ 116 - 1--95 - - - - ~(f I ~ y p ~ 0 Q Y i , kt,` t ~ w . ► . ~ ' SI'OKANE COUNTY PLANNINC3 DEPARTMBM + A_PPL-ICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING AD 1USTOR ~ - , Namof Applicant: -,Max SFaAA,%*v%% Agent: YW 67e street Aaaress: ~ - - . Zip Phone - Home: City; S?o~~ State: Code: Qq~ WorlC ~-3~ Agent's No.: c►~ ~ t Name of Property Owner(s): Mo►x X , _M • t ~ Stimt Address: r4- Zip Phone - Home: ` , City: Staee: Code: 5qXb Work: _q2&t-33ffl ' REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle apprapriatie action): Variance(s) (bonditioqal Use Pem~it Expansion of a pther, - Nonconforming Use j ~ FOR STAFF USB ONLY ' Violat3on/ ~ Secdoq Township Rangg EaforcemenC Y N oFire Dlstrtct •CWWP sewer purveyor: _ N4. ~ •CWSP wstrer ptnrveyor: sCUP standerds meC Y N NA •Existing zone: -1" cl~-' °'Cite applicable secflon? •Comp. Plan designadon; •Arierial Road Plan desigaation: °Critical Areas: Wetland~ ; Habitat~ Geologic ; Aqulfer~; and/or Floodin . ~Lot, legai & add7 ownership checked by: •P~son doing prespp conf. •Other/previous Planning DepacMent acdons involvjng this propertyL SEPA complete spplication dete; •Certificate of Bxemption No.: Applicsdon No.: •Heariag Date: •V g~ plan dlmen g cbecked by~. AB UT THL PR T a ~cant Y pP •Existing use of propearty: Waear.t •Describe proposed use of the property, gotin c~ hanFe froM'exisft use': TvvA ud;} We, li►i~~~ br S\oriViel %1 lo+►~c~Et nh rIoW Udtaa •If a variance application, state the Code stend,and and ' e variance.-sought in comparablg tem-s (i.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet): , 4 r^ f ~ •If a conditional use penarit application, does proposal meet all standards? ~ N ~ V 1 If not, has one ar more variances been requested? Y N , •What is the size of the subject property. 1nucA •Street address of property (if known): ' ' . *Legal description of property (include easement, if alpli ble): s y 26q . 4 1702 . A) 1,2 a~ yl ~'U' . D 1 n *Parcel No(s).: 141;0 SLt. Dl ` , •Source of legal: •Total amount of adjoininici g land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: 3~i►c.res am _ •What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? J06Z 1 STA'I80F WASH9AGIW ) SS GOLJNI'YOFSPiOKANB ) ° I S'WBAR, UNDBR PFNALTY OF PERJURY. THAT: (1) I AM THB OWNBR OF RFOORD OR AtTfHORiZED At3OTI' FUR THE F!'ROPOSED SIIE; (l) EF NOR'THE OWNER, WRrfCEN PBRNQSSION FROM OWNER AVTHORMH(} MY ACIiONS ON NLSMFR BEHALF N A7TACHED; AND (3) ALL OF THB ABOVB RESPONSES AND 74iOSE ON SU"'ORTINC3 DOCUMENTS ARB MADB TRUrnbJILY AIm'PO 7'HEBEST ;1c MY RI~WLBDCi G 3igned: Dae ~ h 9 / . ~V ~ Notasy in and fvr . e staae of Washington, residing : My appointment expires• _ ~A , . ;tQ; A4"~ C , ~,4; • ° :~'~►':ct~~GBL jC ~ 3 P'a8e i o[ 2 ~ f997 HD/ZA APP (RBV.1?J94) ~i, 0 tuuuu~ ~ ~~i~'',~sHIN~~ ~ : _ v q . M 1 1 ~ ~ • • ~ 1 t ►o . r V v I ~ A. BURDEN OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant) It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the REQIJESTP.D ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic anrgument in favor , F ~ of approving the application. Acoondingly, you should have ba:n given a form for youc tequested action (variance, conditional nse, etc.) desipned tD help youpresent your case in a way wlrich ' ~ addmsses the criteria wluch the Zoning Ad~ustor must donsidex. PleaSe fill the fonn out and return ' it with your application. i ~ B. SIGN-UFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES (applicant must vbjt each agency whvse no. js circled below) R°olft~ 1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Propased method of water supply: _edav h_,oCeIrT( b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: Sefi► c- • fi C%~ A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been itiforned ~ of requirements and standards. We request consultation with Planning Department Y N 9 ~ , : , (S1gt1at1I1E) Oft) (S1g1-Off w81Ved) , r x_ I ♦ ; 2. SPUKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (E gineering & osda Divisioa) ~ A pre ary co tati n been held bo di s the proposat. The applicant has be.en inforned< 'j of req ' meats dards. We r~hest sultation with Planning Department Y N " r ~ > } r ' ` r i~atu`{j, , ~W~/,f Sign-a►ff Waiv1) y J ~ rr SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Pl4nning Department may waive ~ if outside WWMA) A preliminaty consultation has been be1d to discuss the proposaL Ile iipplicant has beeri informed of requirements and standards. F t (Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Planning?) r n! The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to b e come in form e, d o f wa ter sys tem y R T',v , ~ requirements and standards. (See #a below) I The applicant is required tQ discuss the proposal with 1 to become informed of sewsge diaposal requiremenLs and standards. (See #b below) , WAT'ER PURVEYOR: . ~ The proposal islis not Iocated within the bouadary of our future service area. ~ 2) The proposal yfij not located withdn the boundery of our current districL J able to seive this site with adequate wat+er. 3) We 4) Satisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to serrve this proposaL alp (Sipature) (Date) • , , , , - . SEWERAGE PURVEYUR: . ( ~ 1 K ,G 4 A 1 A preluninary co►nsultadon has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been v ~ informed of requirements and standards. y t j ~ ,rff ro , r ' J f ` t~ Y ti I (Signature) (Date) ` s A PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT , • • Dete q 5 c 11 r t Number ' I Name - ~ Phone Address ` Comments CUSTOMER ROUTING / ~ QUIL.0ING Department ~ PLANNING Department j,--+f1NG1NEER'8 Department = Addressmg ~ Admm Exception = Approach Permit ~ Building Perrnit = Artenal Rd Plan Info ~ F7ood Plmn Perwt ~ ~ Code Iaforroation s Bindmg Site Plan Info ~ Public/Prnate Roads s Commemal Rmew ~ Cerk of ExempUon ~ Res Bldg Permit Rev , Conferenoe : Comprehensrve Plan s Site Draunage Info : Energy Code Info ~ Cond Use Permit i SubdivLsion Rmew Fire Safety Review : Nonconformung Use = Utiljty Perrmt i Manufactured Home ~ Permit Review i Zone Change Revtew ~ Mechanical Petmits i Shorelines Info q "~jQ ffc/. o 112., - Other Permits Short Plat Info NO UIRfiD i ~ -Revi r Time out ~ Plumbmg Pemuts ~ Subdivision Info = Prnate Road Info ~ Temp. Use Permit PbTlLMES Depa ~ ~3nt ~ ~ Residential Review , Vanance Appl. , APA Payment ~ Sewrer Permits i Zone Check = Cert. of Exemphon ~ Zone Info ! Subdmsion Revnew UL.ID/Sewer Info = Zone Chaage Review e ~ NO FZ~E REQUIRED NO FEE REQUIRED Reviewer Time out Reviewer Time out Reviewer Tune out MASMMwassYOtu cix yiaras ~ SPOKANE ENVIRONM .NTAT, ORDIN N .F (WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE FILE NO(S): CUE-8-95/VE-9-95 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to expand an additional Auto Wrecking and Salvage Yard, lrnown as "Spalding Auto Parts," by adding approximately 11 acres of an adjacent parcel of land to the existing facility. Section 14.629.020 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County allows such a use upon issuance of a Conditional Use Penmit putsuant to § 14.632.240.1 of the Zoning Code. The applicant also seeks a variance to not use sight-obscuring fencing as required by § 14.632.240. l.a. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: June 28, 1995 at 9:00 a.m. in the Commissioner's Hearing Room, Lower Level, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA. PROPONENT: Max Spalding, 2210 N. University Rd., Spokane, WA 99206 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: Generally located in the Spokane Valley, surrounded by Felts Road, Knox Avenue, Shannon Avenue and University Road in Section 8, Township 25N, Range 44F;WM; 2210 N. University Road. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it dces not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environniental Impact Statement (EIS) is = required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other inforniation on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. There is no comment period for this DNS; pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (1). (X) This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted by agencies no later than 5:00 p.m., June 23, 1995, if they are intended to alter the DNS. Citizen comments will be a,ccepted at the public hearing. Responsible Official: WALLIS D. HUBBARD by John Todd Position/Title: Planner 2 Phone: (509) 456-2205 Address: Spokane County Planning Dept., 1026 W. Broadway Ave, Spokane WA 99260 Date Issued:_~ q qy Signature: COMMENTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENT CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT TBE HEARING. APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the Spokane County Planning Department, 1026 W. Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department for assistance with the specifics of a SEPA appeal. _ , ~ DNS; File No. CUE-8-95NE-9-95 Page 2 A copy of the DNS was mailed to: 1. Max Spalding 2. Spokane County Health District 2210 N. University Attn: Steve Holderby Spokane, WA 99206 5. Spokane County Division of 6. Spokane County Fire Protection Engineering and Roads District #1 Attn: SEPA Review 7. WA State Department of Ecology 8. Spokane County Air Pollution SEPA Review Control Authority Olympia, WA 98504 9. Spokane County Division of 10. WA State DepL of Transportation Engineering & Roads 2714 N. Mayfair Attn: Stan Miller/Water Quality Spokane, WA 99207-2090 11. WA State Patrol 6403 W. Rowand Rd. Spokane, WA 99204 Attn: Wrecking Yards HD/CUE-8-95/VE-9-95 DNS • F . r,~L I .s~ A•' t . ' • . ~ ~ * IK- ~ r f rt ~ r ' M1 } ~ ~ ~.~7~.; '"'~A ,a; M6; •G.td!ld~:~I,.~'ar .d ~ +~Ti► . . . • t' , d ~ , I ~ C t ~ ' ~ ~ . A ~l ` ' ~ ~ ~ ~t . ' ~ . f , i ~ J6 • :~5~•` ~r ~ ,C V ~ ~ J,~ ` ~ ~ ~ ,y,,` • ~ / / u • f n f / ~ ~ r ~ - ' ~ r, { ~ ~ ~ •r . i a ~ ~ LAL \ ON. ~ . _ -~i` • x { ~ r ' , ~ . 1 : i-. _ - - r4! UN 8' _ I.... - ' T t7n . `MEA /'1! /m vENT ALS/. 0 I o TOP PLM ram rPNAM PWE FM momrim ~ i Rxf s!E ~ ilOP RNt V . L r~ pall ~17~ii1ARiM nOLE E~IU160 K"APOCHOOMM The optional Internal OverYill Box - ELEYATION comes equipped with a drain valve and prevents spills up to seven gallons. Standar+d Double Containment Vault Tanlcs , lIMQN~~- - ` CONCRETE WEIGKIr SIZE REQUIRED A B ~ C ~ Without Concrete ~ With Concrete • 250 Galipn ~ - 3'r' ~ T8' ~ 3'3' ~ 1.8 yd. ~ 1.100 lb. ~ 7,060 lb. 500 Gallon ~ a' 1" I 11'0" ~ 3'4" l 2.8 yd. I 1.700 lb. ~ 10,760 lb. 1000 Gallon C 4'1a' ~ 117 ~ 4'8-' ~ 3.9 yd. 2,500 lb. ~ 15,380 lb. 1500 Gallon 58" I 127 I 4'11" ~ 4.9 yd. ~ 3.000 lb. I 19,080 lb. 2000 Gallon ~ 7'3` ~ 127 ~ 5'1' ~ 6.0 yd. ~ 3,700 lb. ~ 23,700 lb. 3000 Gallon 7'8" ~ 137 ~ 6'4° ~ 7.5 yd. ~ 7,500 lb. I 32,360 lb. 4ppQ (3alfp~,~=; - ` = , : r8' ~ 157 TO" , 8.9 yd. 8.8001b. ~ 38,4131b. 5000 Gallon 7'8" l 16'4" ~ T10" 10.3 yd. l 10,900 lb. I 45,060 lb. gppp Callon f 78' ~ 194' ~ 7'10' ~ 11.8 yd. 1 12,500 lb. ~ 51•,560 lb. 8000 Gallon 8'0" ~ 247 ~ T10" ~ 14.0 yd. ~ 14.000 lb. I 58,800 lb. 10.000 Gallon ~ 8'0' 29'8' ~ T10' ~ 16.0 yd. ~ 16.500 lb. ~ 67,700 lb. ~ 12,000 Gallon ~ 810" I 365" ~ T10" I 21.0 yd. ~ 21.825 lb. I 89,900 lb. ! Option: Doubie Wall Inner Vault Tanlcs wi#h TtiPle Containment • L DIMENSIONg- CONCRETE ~ - WEIGH'F~ - _ SIZE REQUIRED A ~ B ~ C I Without Concrete I With Concrete 250. Ced{on 3'6'fm' ~ 8'8'w 1 3'3' 2.0 yd. ~ 1.200 lb. ~ 7,700 lb. 500 Gallon ~ 4'114" I 12'4118" ~ 3'4" ~ 3.1 yd. ~ 1.800 lb. ~ 11,850 lb. 1000 Gallon ~ 4'10'"'" ~ 12'411°' ~ 4'8" ~ 4.3 yd. ~ 2,650 lb. ~ 16,600 lb. 1500 Gallon I 5'8' I 14'"e" ~ 4'11" ~ 5.6 yd. ~ 3.200 lb. ~ 21,350 lb. 2000 Gallort ~ T3'w ~ 13'61/0' ~ 51' ~ 6.5 yd. ~ 3,900 lb. ~ 25,000 lb. 3000 Galion ~ 7'83's" I 14'63116" ~ 6'4" ~ 8.2 yd. ~ 7.800 lb. ~ 34,400 lb. 4000 Galiort ~ T8"'' ~ 16'103/8' ~ TO" 9.9 yd. ~ 9,350 lb. ~ 41,325 lb. 5000 Gallon ~ 7'81'-2" ~ 18'4114" ~ T10" ~ 11.4 yd. ~ 11.600 lb. ~ 48,600 lb. 6000 Gellott ~ T8'n" ~ 21'8114" ~ T10' ~ 13.2 yd. ~ 13,300 lb. ~ 56,100 lb. 8000 Gallon 26'101"' I T10" ~ 16.3 yd. I 15,000 lb. ~ 67,825 lb. 10,000 GeNort g•,rz' ~ 33•4 1/4' T10' ~ 19.9 yd. ~ 17,800 lb. ~ 82,300 lb. 12,000 Gallon ~ 810" I 40'0° T10° ~ 31.4 yd. ~ 23.600 lb. I 125,336 lb.