VE-19-94
a~
1
•
~
1/ ■~~~s~.Y a.d
\ ~ .
~
~994
ZONING ADJUSTOR AUG 1 0
r
SP4KANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON C~udv Iiei 'I'IIE MATTEIZ 01' A VARIANCE F1ZOM: j FINDINGS OF FACT's
(A) HEIGHT LIMITATION STANDARDS; ) CONCLUSIONS,
AND (B) PARKING STALL STANDARDS ) AND DECISION
FILE: VE-19-94(A&B)
APPLICANT: CENTRAL PRE-MIX CONRETE COMPANY, INC.
COMPANION FILE(S): BSP-81-21 and BSP-17A-87(altered)
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant requests: (A) height variance of 30 and
10 feet respectively in height far a gravel elevator and storage bin (respectively, to total heights
of 94 and 75 feet); whereas section 14.634.335 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County limits
structure heights to 65 feet; and (B) 39 off-street parldng stalls; whereas, section
14.802.040.37 and .38 of the Zoning Code requires 36-72 stalls (depend.ing upon
interpretation at building permit preconstruction meeting). Authority to consider such a request
exists pursuant to section 14.404.080 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County and Spokane
County Board of County Commissioners resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended.
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located in the central Spokane Valley (Spokane
Industrial Park), south of and adjacent to Marietta Avenue, in the NE 1/4 of Section 12,
Township 25N, Range 44EWM. Parcel Number(s): 45125.9114, 45125.9133 and
45121.9132.
OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE
PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available information
on file, one or more site visits, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of
the public hearing held on July 27, 1994, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on
August/"-, 1994 to APPROVE the applicarion as set forth in the file documents and as
cond.itioned below.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Testimony was taken under oath.
2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file.
3. In compliance with RCW 36.70.450, the Planning Department determined that this
proposal is generally consistent, as conditioned, with the Industrial category of the
Comprehensive Plan.
4. The site is zoned Heavy Industrial (I-3), which allows the proposed use upon
approval of this application.
5. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include various industrial parcel,
several of which are vacant. All of which are compatible with the proposal.
aA
CASE NO. VE-19-94(A&B) SPOKANE C4UNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 2
6. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act, Chapter 43.21 C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b).
7. The Zoiung Code provides no method to deal with equipment structures taller than a
maximum building or structure height for a zone except for the variance procedure. In several
instaaces, includulg the present one, there is no problem with the land (that is, its size, shape,
location or topography). Rather, the problem is the technology which requues a structure taller
than the maxunum height allowed in the zone. In the instant case, the applicant has
demonstrated that as a necessary aspect of the equipment dealing with cement, and the
aggnegate contained wnthin some of the retail products, materials must'gravity flow' from one
portion of the production facility to another pornon. Horizontal movement of these matenals is
nearly impossible and extraordinanly expensive as an alternative. Much energy would be
wasted and unneoessary dust generated in order to conunually raise the material to a height
established as the maximum allowable m the zone in order to accomplish the gcavity flow of
materials.
The eqtupment being proposed by the apphcant is state of the art technology. In
this case, the pnmary conveyor needs to be 95 feet tall and bins for holding some of the
matenals need to be 75 feet tall The Zomng Code provides in § 14 404.082.4.e.u that a
practical difficulty may be the gross restnction or preemprion of innovative or state of the art
technology not anacipated by the drafters of the Code. In that respect, a pracncal dfficulty is
found to deprive the property of nghts and pnvileges enjoyed by other propernes in the vicinity
and sunilar zone classificanons (Zorung Code; § 14.404.082.1 a). Granung the variance for
height wnll not be detnmental to the public welfare or injurious to other properties in the vicinity
and zone. Several other examples exist throughout the County where vanances have been
granted for industrial processes which need height as an element to transfer and sort materials
(cases not listed but available upon file research).
8. Regarduig the parlang stall deviation, the applicant presents the following reason to
case. Depending on how one interprets the vanous acdvities gouig on in the production plant,
facility and office, as few as 36 parlcing stalls and as many as 72 parking stalls may be required
at the bwlding pernait preconstruction meeang The apphcant proposes to provide 39 off-street
parlang stalls. Suice this is a relocation from an existYng facihty on Government Way (on the
west side of the Qty of Spokane), the same number of employees will be used. The number
of office employees and production employees are a known quantity. Since this ls a
production facility, there are essenrially no customers visiting the site. The present number of
employees, both office and production employees, is 25. Apparently the present shift
allocation is one 8-hour day shift for the office employees and one 8-hour day shift for the
production employees. There has never been a history of needing more office employees or
extra shifts of office employees From time to time, there may be a need to work 2 or
(remotely) possibly 3 shifts for the production employee group. Since ttus increased number
of shifts is the manner in which to increase producaon, there is a 2 and nearly 3 fold capacity to
increase production without having to increase the number of parlang stalls, because the one
shift can park in the parking stalls of the previous shift and not need an mcrease in parking.
In the remo;e po~sibility of an increased need in parking stalls, there is the entire
maneuvenng and wor{.itig yard area which can be expanded to include additional parlang
stalls. Presendy, the proposll includes approximately 10-13 more stalls than is anucipated,
based on the number of c»iployees and a limited number of visitors. 'The reasoning provided
HD/VE-19-94(ABcB) Central Prc-Mix
A
f ~ v
CASE NO. VE-19-94(A&B) SPUKANE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 3
by the applicant seems rational and logical in light of the long histiory of the established
business. As in the case of the height variance request, there is no administrative procedure in
the Zoning Code to adjust the number of parking stalls, except to use the variance process.
9. Rohan, in Zoningffld 1.4nd Use Controls, § 43.02 [5], states that over the years a
number of factors have been considered by courts with respect to granting variances. These
include: (1) whether strict compliance with the tenms of the ordinance will praclude a penmitted
use from being pursued; (2) whether the land will yield a reasonable return; (3) the degree to
which the apphcant seeks t,o vary from the ordinance; (4) the degree of harna which will be
imposed on the sunounding area if the variance is graated; (5) whether some other method can
be pursued to avoid the need for the variance; (6) whether the difficulty is self imposed; and (7)
whether the interest of justice and the general welfare will be served. Rohan condnues that no
factor alone controls and all must be considered. It is a balancing act of the competing interest
between the landowner and the community, as expressed through the zoning document.
10. As the Zoni.ng Adjustor considered all the facts, tesrimony, relevant case law and
instructive usefulness of Rohan's Zoning and Land Use Controls, it is concluded that the
balancing test of competing interest hes with approving the variances.
11. No adverse testimony ar written comments were received regarding the proposal.
12. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendauons of various County
agencies reviewing this groject
13. Various performance standards and criteria are add.itionally needed to make the use
compatible with other permitted activiaes in the saine vicimty and zone and to ensure against
imposing excessive demands upon public utilitaes, and these shall be addressed as condidons
of approval.
14. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning
Adjustor of Spokane County have been meL
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES
the proposal (both variance requests) as generally set forth in the file documents, subject to
compliance with the following
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I. GENERAL
1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in
interest and shall run with the land.
HD/VE-19-94(A&B) Central Pre-Mu
A
~
CASE NO. VE-19-94(A&B) SFOK:ANE COUN1'Y 7ANIlVG ADNSTOR PAGE 4
,
2. Failnre m comply with any of the conditions of approval contained in this decision,
except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall consdtute a violation of the Zoning
Code for Spokane County and be subject to such enfarcement as is apprapriate.
3. The Zoning Adjustior may a~dministrarively make minar adjusmnents t4 site plans or
the coaditions of approval as may be judged by the Zoning Adjustor to be vvithin the context of
the original decision.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accardance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body. Variations, when approved by the Planning
Directiar/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape
plans and general allowable uses of the peamitted zone. All variadons must conform to
regulations set forth in the Zoning Cod.e for Spokane County, and the original intent of the
development plans shall be maint~ained.
2. The elevatar for the primary conveyar may be a maximum of 95 feet tall and the
stcyrage bins may be up to 75 feet tall.
3. The proposal of 39 parking stalls is approved. Adrmnistrative authonty is created
for and granted to the Planning Department upon a showing, after aperaxions are ongoing for at
least a year and that 39 stalls is inadequate, to increase to any number deemed suitable.
M. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earhest possible stage
of design/development in arder to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as
autharized by the State Building Code Act Design/development conceins include: Fire
Apparatus Access Roads; Fire Hydrant/Flow; Approved Water Systems: Build.ing
Aocessi ''ty; Construction Type; Ovcupaacy Classification; Exiting, Exterior Wall Protecb.on;
and Energy Code Regulations.
IV. DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accarrlance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
V. HEALTH DISTRICT
None is needed.
1D/VE-19-44(A&B) Central Pre-Mix
A
~
CASE NO. VE- 19 94(A&B) SFOK;ANE COUNTY ZANIlVG ADNSTOR PAGE 5
VI. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
1. The applicant shall comply with the conditions of BSP 87-17.
NOri'ICE: P'ENDING OOMP'LETION OF ALL QONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHIGH
NEED TO BE C4 E PRIOR Ti0 PIItMIT ISSUANCE, PERMT1rS MAY BE
RELF.ASED PRIOR TO TBE LAPSE OF TBE TEN (10)-DAY A►PPEAL PERI4D.
HOWEVER, TBE COLfN'I'Y HAS NO LIABII.ITY IaOR EXPENSES AND
INCO CE INCURRM BY TBE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS
OVERTURNID OR ALTERID UPON APPEAL.
DATED this f~day of August,1994.
^
dZoSpnokaine S G. MOSHER, AICP
nuig Adjustor
County, , Washington
FILID:
1) Applicant (C'ertified/Rettnm Receipt Mail)
2) Opponents of Record
3) Spokane Division of Engineering and Roads
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Division of Utilities
6) Spokane County Depmtment of Buildings
7) Spokane County Fire Protecdon District No. 1
8) Planning Deparmaent Cross-reference F'~le and/or Electronic File
NOTE: ONLY 1'HE APP'LIC;ANT OR AN OPFONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN
APPEAL VVITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF TBE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING.
APPEAL MUST BE AGCOMPANHD BY A$210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FII.ED AT
TBE SPOK;ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING,
1026 W. BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Section 14.412.042 of the Zoning Code for
Spokane County).
,
HID/VE-19-44(A&B) Central Pre-M,x
. .
ENGINEER'S "VIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# VEA-H9=
Related File # ( ) ' f 2 '
Date to Review 7 27-94 Time 9:30 # 2
Date to AA & DR Timc
Date Received 6-27-94
Project Name NEIGHT 94'f75'(CODE 65'-39 PARKING (CODE 36/72) NO. I.OtS NO.Acres 11
-Section - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS S MARIETTA/E SULLIVAN PARCEL # 12545-9133+
Applicant's Name CEN11tAL PRE-MIX CONCREZEE CO Phone # 534-6221
Address 5111 E BROADWAY-SPOkANE WA 99212 Work # 327-8697
Date Conditions mailed
Contact person
FLOOD ZONE d NO W S SCH001,
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architec;t', Ivaiiic
Pla►uung Contact Person E'holie # 456-2205
Date Submiited Description Initials
~
AGREEMENT TO PAY FErS OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TU BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMI1fiED
ALTERATION TO PLA"T - BLOCKS & LOTS
BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINA(ii' IN1i'ROVT-At"1?vTS
HEARING EXAM APPROVED DENtf'l)APi'}.ALLI) 111W l,K().If.( `r AY1'ItCATI) 1+NIi.1>
-7- Z5
~ ✓ ~
'7; 1~
k\pu\review.tor
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1042& W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 4:5-~-r Oc'~ i ax 32,°---:~"_ i~
-VARIANCE REQUIREMENTS-
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Zoning Adjustor
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard!~£
DATE: July 22, 1994
SUBJECT: VARIANCE #VE-19-94 / CENTRAL PRE-MIX CONCRETE CO
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following comments are offered for inclusion in the
Findings and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be
approved.
SPECIAL CONDITION:
We have reviewed the above referenced proposal and have no comments
to make regarding the variance from building height standards. The
applicant shall comply with BSP-87-17 conditions of approval.
r ,
. . . .
s .
i
.'r
~
S P O K A N
CU LI N T N '
I~Tc~~.~`~i~:~~~
DATE: July 27, 1994
TIME: 9:30 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible JUN 2 j~~d ~
PLACE: Spokane County Public Works Building
Commissioners Assembly Room county En~ineeri: ,
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM 2 File: VE-19-94(A&B)
VARIANCF FROM FRONT YARD SETBACK STANDARD
LOCATION: Generally la;a[f'.d lIl lhe CC;IILI'al Spokane; Valley (Spokane Industrial P,irl:
south of and adjacent to Marietta Avenue, in the NE 1/4 of Section 12, Townsh i1) ? 5 N,
Ran<re 44F:WN.I.
PROPUSAL: `l'lic, appliCant rCyuCsts: ~A) fiCiIIIlit vW-ialWC ui' 30 ~inci lU lec;t I'C1spi:~:t11VClt:
in height for a gravel elevator and storage bin (respectively, to total heights of 94 and 75
feet); whereas section 14.634.335 limits structure heights to 65 feet; and (B) Provide 39
off-street parking stalls; whereas section 14.802.040.37 and .38 require 36-72 stalls
(depending upon interpretation at building permit preconstruction meeting).
EXISTING ZONING: Heavy Industrial(I-3)
SITE SIZE: Approximately 11 acr(
APPLICANT: Central Pre-Mix Concrete Company
5111 E. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99212
AGENT: John Konen
David Evans
110 W. Catalcl,,
Physieally Disabled Access: t~-ll nit•eting~, .incl lic1i{'111gs ~iiOl i)e cut►clucteci iri fiicilitir,N
which are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particular information, please
contact the Spokane County Planning Department at (509) 456-2205.
NOTE: THE ZONING ADJUSTOR WILL ISSUE A WRITTEN DECISION TO APPROVE OR DENY
THE ABOVE PROPOSAL. ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY
APPEAL T'HE ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION AND MUST DO SO WITHIN TEN (14) CALENDAR
DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE DECISIONS SIGNING. APPEALS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A$210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SPOKANE COUN'I'Y PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING, 1026 WEST BROADWAY, SPUKANE, WA 99260
(SECTION 14.412.042 OF THE ZONIING CODE OF SPOKANE COUNTY). THE ABOVE
REFERENCED FILE MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE PLA.NNING DEPARTMENT.
WEST 1026 BIZOADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTOti 99260-0240 • (509)456-2205
~
.
a A- -
zZiffiar-W
~ ► J - ~ ~ ;
RO^
h ' t3
0
~ I r J~ LIL ~ AN
S
TD• 2/
00 ~j 1 ' ~ ► ~
C)
h ~ ~ V
_ - - . ~ - ~ - h~ ;
y ~ ~ ~ ' < I y
%L
,p • - _ ~ 'i
w
o I • . .
` M
~
\
~ - . . . • . . _ ,
~ -
' ~w^' - , , •
6":""~~s3 .
•
Y
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ ~ cW ~
APPLICATIONS RE -/,~,7(~-/.
Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.:
Name of Applicant: C'entral Pr.e-Mi_x ~r-ic-r.~te Cn,qgent: Y N~7•n• Vnn°n
Street Address: F. 5111 Rroadway Ave. ,
Zip Phone - Home:
City: Snokane State• ~ Code: 99212 Work: (509 ) 534-6?.2 .
• Agents No. (509) 327-8697
Name of Property Owner(s):Srokane Indust.ria? pa-'--,
Street Address: N. 3808 &i]_livan Road, 81dq. N-? ~7,,.
Zip Phone - Home:
~~ty; Suokane St~e: WA Co,~e: 99216 Work: ( 509 ) 924-1720
. . _ . _ . , e ent e . . ion
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action): Variance(s Conditional Use Permit Nonconforming Lot/Use
Waiver o Violation Temporary Use/Structure Other: .
_Gp1FOR STAFF USE ONLY CODE:* ORDINANCE
Cite Regulations Section(s):
Property Violation/
Section: Township: Range: Size: Enforcement: Y N
Existing Zone: Comp. Plan Des.: Crossover
LEGAL
PSSA: Y N UTA: Y N ASA: Y N FIRE DIST.: CHECKED BY:
Hearing Date: Personnel Taking in Application:
Existing Use of Property: Vacant-
Describe Intended Proposal in Terms of REQUESTED ACTIONS above: To allow a cr.►-ave1 elevator
and asto.rage hin to extend 95 and. 7.5,feet resnectivPly in heiqht whQr.eas Section
14 634.335 limits st-riic-fiure heights . to. 65 feeet-_to provide for_ 39 off-street parkinq
stalls wherea.s Se-:tion 14,8~1e~t 0_ ~oenUe rec~iire 36 to 72 staJ_]_s.
Street Address of Property:
Legal Description of Property (include easement, if applicable): S°e Attached.
kTo P.rovide for 39 o.ff-street parking stal_ls whereas Section 14.802.040 could recplire
36 to 72 sta)_ls,
r
Parcel No(s): 45125.9133; 451.21.9132 Source of Legal: TaV7.o?" Enaineerin(j, Ine.
ntn. 45125.9114
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor: sponsor contr.,-)7_stl.:,
ad-ioininq _1_and. Stxokane TndustriaJ. P T:'k controJ.s appr.oximately 500 acres.
Wfiat interest do you hold in the property~l
Acrre°ment to Pu.rchase
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
Einding Site Plan No. 88-21 and 1Vo. 87-17.
STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ S S
COUNTY OF .SPOKANE ~ . ° . , . •fys . _ .
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERNRY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED
AGENT F'OR TfE PROPOSED S1TE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRTITEN PERMISSION FROM SAID
OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE
BFST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
Signed:
Address:
Phone No.: Date:
NOTARY SEAL: '
Notary Public in and for the state of Washington,
_ residing at
My appointment expires:
. . . . . . f Y . yY
' . ' • , . ` ~,s~,~ - %k... - ~,.3, sZ: d~~t~ ,
' "r +rri r. ~ '~K ~ , ' _ M;`•y , • ,C•
-~4 ar e
~ . 'E~,••: . - -f , _ . . . ~ - r - ; _ . A"
' . ~ ~ • . . , . '`~i ~ . . . ' ~ ~r~+-` ~~~3r ~ . •t,i.
. . . 5 t y-;. ~
II , , t • ~ MZ~ , ~rw~•
~ t ~
~ _ '.f l~~.;~. .
, ~ 1 ',..-e tv~I, ~
A. ~UKi?EN OF`PROnF
It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons
why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic '
case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action
(variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way '
which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please ~I1
the form out and return it with your application. If you did not get a form, ask the •
Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed.
B.
. ^ A'~!
1. _ , _
a) Proposed method of water supply: ~
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal; -
t
~
A~preliminary consultation has been held to discuss ~~the proposal. The applicant ~
~
has been informed of requirements and standards. '~t,
~
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
,
2 COUNTY ENGINEERIN T DEPARTM ,NT ~
A preliminary consultatio as bee held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
. has bee inf of r iremc s and standards. ~f
. _
~
. ~ ~ -
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
3. (Waive if outside WMAB)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The ~
applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. ~
.
~.,T
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived) ~
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of water system
requirements and standards. ~~~-`~,t
+4 ~
' ~~o>
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with ~
. : ~ F~.
_ to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards. ~ ~
~~~~c . ,
1'~4. ~AT_ER PURVEYOR. (Waive if out~ide CWSSA~
a) The proposal ' located within the boundary of our future
servica area.
b) Thc proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our current
ra.,~:
t:.
district.
c) We are/are not able to serve this site with adequate water. ~>y:
d) Satisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to serve this
proposal. . ~ . . " .
. .
~i-~~ (Si nature . " `
~ g ) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
S ~
~ 5. ~EWERAGE PURVEYOR: - .
~j (If other than Spokane County)
~r:
.
, A prelimiaary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal.
The applicant has been informed of requirements and ~ standards. `
~
i~-`'.
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
: n'.
_ _ -
r~ ~r,r ' ~r ~ 3;-
. ~ ' . _ r,~_ -
r ~
Page 4 of 4 ~ z
. -~~h~. j~- ~T ~.4~ ~ <k~~ ,
- ~ F , ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ : Y d
r ` - '~ti`- ~ ~ Y.
. ' t.b4 ~r~" 's' ~ . . ~ _ ! .J' x ' "~~1 ~c.. 7~i" .
. ~ ~ - ~ - " , ~ *.~i ~.~.*t-. ~„"f . A~., -
. ~ ~ „ ~`q S~ .
. - . ~i. > ~ - •
t~f . ~ ~ •a ~.i
. . - _ i.'G ~ .'~i e ~ ~ ~ ~ : , ' ~ ~ ~Y _ , ~ . t. . ,
• - . ~ ~e3 a.r"rf - . . . h. -S . . , .
' . . . . ~,_:cJO~~~ .t~i~`~i } , ~ ~ ~'`1 . r C~~ ~'~r~ •Y - 't
a...
~ . - . . . , , . ; 'Y ~ . ' _ ~.s, r . .
. . . . . . - . ~ac ~ :~4 . ~ , ' , t' _ ~ ♦ i
~ . . . - ~ . . . . -
1,~~
w
~ PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT
Date:
Number:
Name ~ it 4~
Address
/
Comments:
\.JlVYLL f`I rl U~J I liV
/
113UILDING Department PLANNtNG Department
~ . , . ,/ENGINEEA'S Department >
_ Addressing , Admin. Exception i Approach Permit
i Building Permit s Arterial Rd P1an Info ~ Flood Plain Permit
i Codc Infotmation = Binding Site Pian Info i Public/Private Roads
, Commercial Review _ Cert of Euemption _ Res. Bldg Perrnit Rev.
, Conference , Comprehensive P1an i Site Drainage Info
_ Energy Code Info Cond. Use Permit Subdivision Review
, Fre Safery Review ~ Nonvonforming Use , Utiliry Permit
_ Manufactured Hocne ~ Permit Review ?9ne Change Review
- - ~ VApl aittc- t4-F_-1vrq1-) ~
! Mechanical Pemoits i Shorelines Info ~ q,.- j33
_ Other Permits Short P1at Info :-jRe FEF,REQUIRED
ewe Time out
, Plumbing Pertnits i Subdivision Info
~ Private Road InCo i Temp. Use Perrnit f UT1L1T1ES Department ~ I
_ Residential Rsview ~ Varianoe Appl. i APA Payment
i Sewet Permits ~ Zone Check ! Cert, of Exemption
Zone Info Sutxiivision Review
ULID/Sewer Info
Zone Cliange Review
_ NO F1:13 RF_QUIRE-D 1Vp Z:E REQU7RED
Rcvicwcr T+mc out Review+er Time out Rcvicwcr Time out
l t 1 I
. '
. • .
C .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNIEiV'T
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZOIVING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTNiENT
Ceriificate of Exemptio A Application No.: VE-1
Name of Applicant: Gen _ra . r.e-Mix Cqncrste COpgent: ~ N~~•n• Konen (~7-8~j~~
Street Address: F. 513.1_ B.roadway Av-.. ,
Zip Phone - Home:
City: _S?x?kan° State: %%'A Codc: 90 7'1Work: (509) 534-6221
Agents No. ( 5n9 ) 3?7-R697
Name of Property Owner(s): Sn?'K:a-nP_ 19dustr.7_ai_ Park, Inr.
Strcet Address: 3~,n~, Pncicl, B1_dq. !V-1_5
Zip Phone - Home:
~~txn .S?x) '~,-1 n~_~ St~c; Co~e• 99216 Work: (509 ) 924-1720
► ` _ , Qnt . uorrR . _ i.nn
REQUESTED AC"TION(S) _(Circle _appropriate_action)-
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Violation/ ~
Section--La nshipv qPLARanp-rEnforcement: Y N
•Lot and legal ch c lyc •CVVWP sewer purveyor:
~sto►a OA
•CWSP water PurveYor:~L •CUP standards met: Y N~-- K '
•Existing zone: Z~ Cite applicable section,
5 • erial Road Plan designation: f tILEria
~IcUpja
•Comp. Plan d' ation:
•Fire Distric .•Person doing preapp conf.: -~t'~'~~~ Y)P~
•Other/previou annin Department ctions involving this property: - a~
•Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No. \JE-
lolqq •He 'ng Date: L •Site plan dimensioning checked by: rratcj
~ ' f~'~~ ` ~ 2
escne Intended Proposal in Terms of REQUESTED ACTIONS above: To ~~llov~T c-r►~s-~~.~p]_ elevator anr~. a q}o.r_ ~~qe hin to ?xt`nd 95 anc~ 75 feet espect~ ~~ely in hQic~ht ~vherea~; Sect ion
14 634.335 limits stnlrture heiqhts to 615 fe~~t.to provid.e for 39 off-str.eet parkinc.
stal ]_s whAreas Section 14,?80~?~..ePt 0 ~~uld zec~iixe 36 to 7~ sta7.7_s.*
Street Address of Property: ~nuP
Legal Description of Property (inclu e easement, if applicable): Sae Attached.
**To Provide fnr 39 nff-str_ eel parking stpl? s whereas Section 14.802.040 could .rec-n-iir.
36 tr) 72 sta11_s.
Parcel No(s): 451? 5•9133 ; 45 J_21. 9 132 Source of Legal: 'I'aYi.r)'" Encrinn e.rinq, I,lc.
ntn. 45125 .9114 .
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor: sPOnsor contr. ~))_q th
adJoaninq 1_and. S-ookane Tndustria7. .Par.k c;nntrols, an~r.nximat°ly 500 acres.
What interest do you hold in the property? ~
Acrr-eemp_n,~ to Pu.rchase
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: `
S'I,AI'E UF WAStiliti'GTON ~ SS
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED
AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERNiISSION FROM SAID
OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE,
ABOVE RESP(3NSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING D
ARE MADE TRj.~an.1-Y A?~TI7 TC? TF
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDC'E.
OC7,o '5~
Signed:
Address: ' Q. Loxr
~ c
Pho o.• - Date:
s~i r - - Nota P4bli and i t e f W i
~J ~ ✓ C~
- r - residing at
~ My appointmcn expires:
J
. , ~ _
~ ~ J' ~ •.,y _
, • ~ ...i ` ' ,'.x y ~j ~
~ ` . • ` ~l,_~~~
' ~ C y • . . . 'JG Q'
- - A. R~Fl3D~N ~ ROQF
f. . •is necP.vsary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons
;~lie`- .-i2EQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic
case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested 'action
(variance, conditional use, etc.) designed . to help you present your, case in a way
which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill
the form out and return it with your application. If you did not get a forni, ask the Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed.
B. HER A E IF
1.
a) Proposed method of water supply:
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal:
A preliminary consultation has been held to iscuss the proposal. The applicant
has =befd of e irement nd d rds.
~
agnature) (Date) (Sign-off `~'aivedj
2 COUNTY EN tINFFRIN t DEPARTti1F:N'1'
A preliminary consultatio , as bee /held to discuss the proposal. T'tle applicant
has bee,~inf of r-' ireme s and standards.
C6 ~
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
3• (Waive if outside WMAB)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant h s be n informed of requircments and standards.
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
' to become informed of water systev,,
~ re9uirements and standards.
~
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with s~-Lc._ ~v
to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards.
4. WATER • (W
- aive if outside LW SS.a)
a) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our futurc
service area.
b) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our current
~ district.
, c) We are/are not able to serve this site with adequate water.
r
~ d} Satisfactory arrangemcnts have/have. not heNn made to serve this
proposal.
(Signature) _ (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
~ 5. SEWERAGE P 1RVF,YnR.
_
~ (If other than Spokane County)
, A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal.
,~Pie lic nt has been informed of requirements and standards.
J
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
Page 4 of 4
N • .
_ r
w . . ~ .
' H'~ ~ . ~ _ , _ - .
-~jF~
_ _
. _ ` _
. ~
. ~
r . ,
~
/ I
1
~A. I,~D F~N.,~ ' 4 ~
Yt is neccssary for the applicant or his/h~r representativc to estat~lish the reasons ~
why thc ~EQ~ESTED ACTION should be a~provcd and to litcrally put forth thc basic
C3SC. Accordingly, you shvuld t~avc bcei~ given a#'vrm for yo~c requested action '
(varianee, conditional use, etc.) designed to heIp you present your casc in a way
wh'sch addrtsses the criteria which Ihe L4ning Adjustor must consider. PIease fill
the form out and retUrn it with your applic~tyvn. If you did nc~t get a~'arm, ask tlze •
Planning Department personnel for adv;ce on how to proceed.
,
. •
1 '
.
a) Proposed mct}~od of water supply:
b) Proposed methad of scwag~ disposal: ,
A prcliminary consultation .has b~en held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has been informed of rGquirements and standards.
(S~gnature) (Datt) (Sign-nff Waivcd)
~ ~O NTY'~'~I 1Ij~EE~iN~_ U~P_A~T'L~i~N1~ C~
A prelimin~ry eonsultation has becn held to discus.~ chc !~rn*~nS;~~. Th~ ~~G,~ar,~~
has been intormcd of requircmcnts and standardfi.
{Signatute) {Uatcj (Sign-off Waiv d)
3, ' (Waive if o~tsidc u'MAB) ~
[ J A Prcliminary COnsultatlpn has been held to discuss the proposai. The.
~pplicant has bctn infarmed ~f requircments ~nd standards.
(Signature) (i~atc} ~Sign-off Vr'ai~,~GCi}
[ 1 Thc applicant is requircd to discuss the proposal wich
to become informcd vf water system
requirements and standards,
j~ 7"he applicant is required t~ discuss the propasal with
to become informed of sewage disposal
rcquirements and standards. ~
~/~I/. y,G~s 4. ~Y.~T.~`:~. ~'.~R ( W a i v~,...iL Q~~ l~P
~
a) The proposai y~~_~1~cated w~chin the b~undary c,f our fu~ure
scrvicc ar~a.
b) Tht proposal ' locatcc~ witt~in t~ze botlndar}' oC our currcnt
district.
c) We able to serv is stte with adequ~cc watcr,
d) Sati actory arrangernents ~ il~vc n~~ her.n nlade t~ ~erve this
posal.
. / ~ 9~
(S i gn atu rc} .(Datc) (Sign-off Waivcd)
.
5• ~ y W~~RA YF 1" 1R,~~ QR.
(If oiher than Spokane Co~nty)
~ 7 A prelir~iit~ary consuitation has been held to discuss the proposai.
Thc applicant has been ini~ormed of rcquiremcnts and ~ st7ndards.
(Signaturc} (Uate) (Sigr~-~ff ~Vaivcd)
~'age 4 of 4
,
' . . PENTZER
D EVELO PMENT
CORPORATION
A WASNlNGlO,V WAIfP, PpWER COMPANY
N. 3808 Sullivan Road Phone: (509) 924-1720
SPOKANE /NDUSTR/AL PARK Spokane, lh'A 99216-1670 fAX: (509) 924-3748
March 24, 1994
Plans Examiner
SPOKANE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
1303 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99201
RE: CENTRAL PRE-MIX DEVELOPMENT PROPnSAL
Dear Sir or Madam:
P1ea.5c be advise.d that Pentzer Development Corporation has entered into negotiations
with Central Pre-Mix, Inc. for the purchase of an 11.05 acre parcel of land located in the
Southern portion of Spokane Business & Industrial Park. We anticipate that an ao-reement
will soon be reached regarding the sale of this property.
I have been advised by Mr. Tim Murphy of Central Pre-Mix, Inc. that his company intends
to apply for a building permit to construct a new facility on the aforementioned site. Tim
has further advised me that a mechanical assembly proposed for the site would exceed the
existing height restriction for I-3 zoned property, requiring his company to submit an
application for variance of the height restriction with your office. Lastly, Tim has advised
me that the assembly in question would have a finished height of approximately ninety-six
feet.
Plea.se be advised that, assuming a sale does occur, Pentzer Development Corporation
would have no objection to a variance permitting the new structure at a height of ninr;ty-
six feet situated upon the parcel purchased by Central Pre-Mix, Inc.
Should you require any additional information concerning this issue, please do not hesitate
to contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
PENTZER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
:
, Za,Scott R. Brown
Vice President, Asset ment
mjc
~-D H ON.D: CQ'P Dr"➢9 C_T_ ~DrX
~ PAIN7ED ON RECYCLED PAPER
+ ~ 1--~ 1~ ~~~~Y
/ VARIANCE BURDEN of PROOF Form NAME: Central Pr.e-Mix Goncrete Co.
FILE NUMBER '
Inmoduction to this form:
A"variancc" is the means by which an adjustmcnt is madc in the application of the specific
rcgulations of the zoning classification for a particular (the subject) piecc of property. This
property, bccause of special circumstanccs applicable to it, is depnved of privileges commonly
cnjoyed by other propertics in the vicinity and in a similar zonc classification. This adjustment
rtmedies the difference in privilcgcs. A vanance shall not authorize a use othcrwise prohibited in
the zonc classification in which the propcrty is located.
Thc following questions will help to dctcrmine the outcome of your requcst. Your request
requires accurate and complete responscs. First circle cithcr the "ycs" or the "no" answer(s)
following the questions bclow as thcy apply to your situadon and thcn cxplain as ncedcd (in the
space providcd) to majce your unique situation clear. Certain phrases from the Spokane County
Zoaing Code -scetioa on- vanances are ineludcd in these questions: They are underlined.-
If your requcst is a ROAD FRONTAGE VARIANCE please answer only questions A,B,C,D,
and E.
A. Will this variance permit a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? Yes 00
Explain: Section 14. 629 .070 allaws conc.r.ete prcx9uct marnufacturing/reacly-mix
concr_ ete as a per_mittecl use in the 1-3 zone. B. Are there svecia.l ci.rcumstances (lot size, shape, topography, location, access,
surroundings, etc.) which apply to the subject properry and which may not
not apply to other properties in the 'vic~? Yes No
Explain : Tndus tr ial zones in Spnkane Cn,_intv n?_ ov' 7 -d° for a maxirrlum hiii.ldinq
hei_qht rf =10 f.eet in the 1-1 ancl I-? zones an(3 6=) feet in the 1-3 zone.
S~Dokane Cot.inty does not }-ia-,.7e a zone which would a11ow the use cvith t.hP height
requoste-0. .
C. Is the subjcct property dcrnivcd of privileQCS commonlv enioYed b oy ther
in the ncnitv and in a similar zone classification? Yes No
Explain :'I`wo lumher companies a_re sittiated within the Spokane zndustrial Park
have hoppers Qxtenc?°d to 66 feet and 78 feet rAspectively (Hu,ntwood
Indtistries, P_Lun C:reek i,iimbe.r ) .
D. Will this variance be harnaful to the public welfarc or to other propertics in
iginiQLand asimilar zonc classification? Yes (No) -
the yi
Explain: At least f_ive i_ndustr_ia]_ nperations in the vicinity of Spolcane
IndustriaJ_ Park have either_ silos, huiJ_dinqs, or hoppers extendinQ over 50
feet in heiqht.
E. Are there other similar situadons in the yicinity in asimilar zone classificarion? es No
Are they permitted uses ? Yes No Are they "nonconform.ing" uses? s No
Expla.in: See abave. Acrricu]_tu.ral and forest nrcx:essors are al]_owe~3 tn P-d~end
I-)-ynnd the ondinance huilding heiqht limitations per Section 14.810.120.
,
F. Could the subject property be put to a reasonable and pernutted use by you or
anot.her person without the requested variance? Yes No -
Expla.in: The I-3 prnperty. cou?_d be put to use fnr a differ°nfi user. Apprrnral ~
of a variance would a11ow this facil.ity to lcx:at-. in Smkane County. , -
G. If this request is granted, will the subject property be more environmentally sensitive
energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic property? Yes No
Explain: The concrete mix/b_l_ock p1ant uses crravi t.v to aJ_J.ow rnot°rials to pass
frc5p nne p.r.ocess to the other. If the var. iancA were deniea, extra elevator_s
and smaJ_ler sitns wr)u1d nend AV~91S,4_* incr_easing enerqy costs and reclucing
Rev: S~Z~`9(rf f_ iciency nf the nl.ant. page 1
~
H. If this variance is granted, will che broader public need or interest be served? (fes No
Explain: ?'~e concr°te mix and concrete b:Lock olant wotiJ_d operate efficiently to
mate.r_ ials to t-t7p Spokane ma.rket.
I. Will this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies
to the subject property? Ye No
Explain: 'I'he zoning provides for concrete product manufacturing. The Snokane
Industrial Park is an area with heavy manufacturing uses requiring towers, storage
- -
b1t1S , dI1d S110S .
J. Will approval of this variance grant to the subject property the privileges of a d.ifferent
zone classification (in other words would this be a"de facto" zone change)? Yes No
Explain: 'I'his t)gDi;~ of use is pew-itted_only in the I-2 and I-3 zone and possibly
the mining zone as a ccmplementary use of a cplarry.
K. Will this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan? Yes o
Explain The ~~nprehensive P]_an acknowled eq s the need for industria7_ uses to
serye the area.
L. Is this variance required for a reasonable economic return from the subject prope
or is the exisang structure too small? es No
Explain: _If the variance is denied, the efficienc_y and layout of the operation
wnuld change requiring more building coverage.
M Did the practical difficultv which caused you to apply for this varianee exist
before you owned the subject property? (eD No
Explain:Apnlicant has aqreed to pirchase property subj ect permit approval_s.
N. If approved, would this variance affect land use density regulations which exist
to protect the Rathdrum/Spokane Aquifer? Yes No
Explain:This is an ind.ustrial proposal with no change .in the regulations
rotecting the aquifer_. The foilowing space is for further explanation. Your application will get better consideration if
what, how, and why you propose your application is clear. Attach an additional page(s) if needeti.
The applicant has provided photographs of other structures and p.rocessors in the
Spokane Industrial Park area. The height is needed to prwide a step to step
manufacturing oper_ation together with the pollution control equipment necessary
to reduce dust emissions frrm the operation.
You are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of
this application (we have the equipment to display video tapes). No such additional material
is required and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be
considered in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure
to be followed feel f'ree to contact the Spokane County Planning Department (456-2205).
Page 2
, .
. '
, \16) ~
VAeAHCL
Fh ~
V CE BURDEN of PROOF Form NAME: Central Premix Concrete Co.
F1I.E NtIMBFR
Iatroducdon to this form:
A"variance" is the mcans by which aa adjustment is mada in the application of the specific
regulaaons of the zorung classification for a parricular (the subject) pioce of propcrty. This
property, because of special circumstances applicable to it, is deprived of pnvileges coaamonly
eajoyed by other propertias in the viciniry and in a sinular zone classification. This adjusanent
remedies the dLfference in privileges. A vanance shall not authonu a usa otherwise prolubited in
the zone classificaaon in w6ich the property is located.
Tha followuig quesaons will halp to determine the outconla of ~rour t+equest. Your request
requires accurace and complote ~sponses. First circla aithor the yes" or the "no" answer(s)
followuzg the quesaons below as thcy apply to your situation and thon explain as necdcd (un the
space provided) to majce your uaique situation claar. Certain phrases from the Spokane County
Zoning Code scenoR on variaaces arc includad ia these questions. Thay m Underlined;
~ E: rcqucst is a ROAD FRONTAGE VARIANCE please aaswer only quesdons A,B,C.D,
A. Will tlus vanancc perimit a use which is othcrwisa probibited in this zona? Yes No
Explaui: Section 14.629.020 allaws concrete manufacturing ready-ms.x concrete
as a permatted use 1.n the I-3 zone.
.
B. Are there snecial c=umstgnes (lot size, shapa, topography, locadon, access,
surroundings, ete.) wtuch apply to the subject property and which may not
aot apply to other propernes m the y~~y? Yes No
Explazn ;'1'he prWect is located in an I-3 zone ws.thin a defs.ned industrial
district on 11.05 acres.
.
C. I c~su~ bj~t~e P~Y d and ui a 'rges commonlv r4~Ygd~LY..Q.IhgS Y
Y~1uL cs No
Explaui :'I'he S'pokane Industrial Park contains many heavy manufacturing
.UgPS which r)rovide parkina adectuate for employees but not on a bu1.l.ds.ng
ratio bass.s.
D. Wdl chus variance be harmful to the public welfare or to othGr properties in
the vl in,~and a similar zone classification? Yes No
Explain: The recruested parkincx variance will not create paackinq demands -
offs a.te.
E. Are therc other similar situations in the 'VC1~ in a similar zone classification? Yes No
Are they pernutted uses ? Yes No Are they "nonconforaurig" uses? Yes No
Explain: The Spokane Industrial Park contal.ns many heavy manufacturers such
as machlne assem5l.y and"Tabricati.ng sfiops w ic. pmv s
for employees only.
F. Could the subject property be put to areasonable and pernutted use by you or
another person without the requested vanance? Yes No
Explain: If it vaere determined that 72 spaces would be required, mare areas
wauld need to he paved. The stalls wauld never be occupied.
G. If this requcst is granted, will the subject property be mora environmentally sensidve,
energy conservung, or will it prornote the use of an tustoric property? Yes No
Explatn. Each manufactur.inc; ox)eration is unique in allocation of emplayees
for floor area. In thi.s i.nstance, an over allocation of parking would
resuit in more paved surface, more surface water drainaqe, and a lack of use.
Over please
Rev: 5/22/90 Paga 1
w
.
• •
.
~ • •
H. If this vanance is granted, will thc broadr.r pubUc noed or interest be served? Yes No
Explain: Parkina should conform to the 'Dro-iected need. This nlant is v~y
specialized with fewer than 25 emplovees workina at the facilitv durs.nQ the daytime
shift.
1. Will ttus vanancc be inconsistent with thc pwposc of the zoning which applies
to the subject property? Yes No
Explain: 'I'he parkinQ variance will not chanqe the purnose of the I-3 zonsnct
catecxoxv.
. ,
J. Will approval of this varianee grant to the subject property the privileges of a different
zone classification (in other words would this ba a"da facto" zone change)? Yes No
Explain This type of use 1.s permitted only in the I-2 and I-3 zones and
,mslv in h _ ms.ninar zone.
K Will this vanance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
Explain The Canprehensive P]_an aclmowledges the need for industrial uses
. to s erve the area.
L Is this vanance required for a reasonable econonuc return from tha subject property
or is the exisnng swetura too small? Yes No
Explain: If the vari.ance is denied, more of the site area would need to be
a1located for narkinq and storm water drainaqe. It is impassabler at th3-stime
to prAcisely allocate parking requirements within each manufacturing buildl.ng.
M Did the nraccical difficulrv which caused you to apply for this vanance exist
before you owned the subject property? Yes No
Explain: The applicant has agreed to purchase the property subject to conditions.
'N If approved, would this vananca affect land use density mgulaaons which exist
co protect the Rathdrum/Spokane Aquifer? Yes No
Explain. This a.s an industrial proposal with no change 3-n the regulations
Aertaininq to the aquifer.
,
The following space is for further explanadon. Your applicauon will get better consideration if
whac, how, and why you propose your applicaaon is clear. Attach an addiaonal page(s) if needcd.
.
Tao huildings on the premises will be used for manufacturing. Within each building
wnll be areas Involved in the production process whinc could be construed as ware-
house/storage in nature and areas which could be constwed as manufacturing/work
station 1.n nature. In order to determl.ne the exact park.uig requirenents, a detailed
schematic of the 1.nternal workings of the operation vuould be requ3.red and perhaps
subject to a wi.de range of interpretation. A variance based on emplayees rather than
flcxor use will provide an early resolution to this dilanna.
You are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of
this application (we have the equipment to display video tapes). No such additional material
is required and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be
considered in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions aboui the pracedure
to be followed feet free to contact the Spokane County Planning Department (456-2205).
Page 2
w
~
f '
♦
• ~
BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
IN THE MATTER OF BINDING ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
SITE PLAN NO. BSP-87-17 ) COIVCUJSION AND DECIStON (9~
a~
A
THIS MATTER, an application from Spokane Industrial Park has been received ^
decided upon, pursuant io Spokane County Subdivision regulations, on the 5th day
of May, 1988 A
The individual signing below has further been properly delegated the
responsibility for rendering the decisfon by the Spokane County Dtrector of
Planning
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCUJSION
t The proposal is to divide 160 acres into 46 lots for the development of tndustrial
lots.
2 The proposal is located in the north haif of Section 12, Township 25 North. Range
44 E W.M., Spokane County. Washington, lying north of the railroad between
Sullivan and Flora Roads.
3 The current zoning of the property is Manufacturing, established in 1960. The
proposed bt sizes, frontage and intended uses are allowed within this zone.
4 The Spokane County Comprehensive Pian designates this area as Industrial. The
lots and uses proposed ere generaliy in acxord wtth this planning category.
5 The required public notice was provided for this proposal and agencies having a
potential interest in the project were notified and asked for recommendations
6. There was a recommendation for a more detailed environmental review from the
Spokane County Engineers The sponsor and the Spokane County Engineers have
agreed upon necessary road improvements and phasing of development to mitigate
potential improvements and phasing of development to mitigate potential edverse
tratfic tmpacts. A mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance is substituted for the
original D.N.S.. The mitigating measures recommended by the Spokane County
Engineer's have been agreed upon by the sponsor to generally reduce anticipated
traffic impacts ot the proposal.
7 That in consideration of the recommended conditions and Spokane County
development standards, ihe proposal is not detrimental to the public heaith, safety
and general welfare.
8 That the project is proposed to have phased development in three stages with
necessary improvements oonstructed to meet the needs of each phase. Such phasing
is consistant with subdivision practices.
9 That the provisions of the Manufactudng Zone and other sections of the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance apply to the use of the individual lots.
DECISION
Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact, Binding Site Plan Application BSP-
87-17 is hereby APPROVED subject to oondittons noted below which shell be
compited wlth by the epplicant and/or sponsor prior to /tnellzetion of the binding
site plan
. ~
,
Findings for BSP•17-87
Page 2
CONDITIONS OF PPROVAL FOR BSP-87-17
That the below listed conditions of ail Denartments and Aaencies are bindina unon
the gpplicant, ownQrtsl of the g2rQo. ertv. heirs, suocessors or assians.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
1 The preliminary binding site plat of record approval is for the propeny legally
described in the application for this proposal.
2 That the Final Binding Site Plan be designed substantially in conformance with the
preliminary binding site plat of reoord as legally described and advertised. No
increase of lot number shall occur without a new appiication submittal and
approval
.
3 The Spokane County Subdlvision Administrator shall review any proposed Final
Binding Site Plan to insure oompliance with the Findings and Conditions of
Approval.
4 That the preliminary binding sfte plan be given oonditional approval for three (3)
years to June 1, 1991. The applicant may request an Extension of Time by
submitting a written request forty-flve (45) days prior to the above expiration
date
5 That a Final Bfnding Site Plan number be indicated before the flnal binding site
plan is filed; such number to be approved by the County Planning
Director/Designee.
6 That appropriate road names be indicated on the binding site plan.
7 That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the proposed flnai
binding site plan. Written approval of said utility easements by sald utility
companies must be received with the submittai of the final btnding site plan
8 That 3 current certificates of tiile be furnished the County Planning Department
prior to filing the final binding site plan.
9 That the following statement be pleced in the final binding site plan dedication: "No
more than one primary use be placed on any Lot nor shall any lot be further
subdivided for the purpose of creating additlonal lots, ownerships, or building sites
without first filing a replat."
10 The final binding site plan map shall indicate by a ciear dashed line, the required
seibadcs from ail private, tract x or public roads. The dedicatlon shall oontain a
staternent that: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shali be determtned at the time
building permits are requested. The setbacks indicated on this binding site plan
may be varied irom if proper zoning approvais are obtained."
r
11 That a pian for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection be
approved by the water supplier, fire protection district. Spokane County Building
& Safety Oepartment and County health authorities. The agencles wlll certify on
the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final binding site plan or any phase of
the preliminary binding site plan that the pian is in conformance with their
respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAN and certification will be
drafted on a transparency sujtabie for reproduction and be signed by the sponsor.
12 The purveyor will aiso certify on the Water Plan that appropriate cbntractual
arrangements and schedule ot improvements have been made wiih the sponsor for
construction of the water system in acoordance with the approved WATER PLAN
The time schedule for improvements will provide tor completion of the water
system and inspection by ihe appropriate health authorities prior to application
for building permits within the final binding site pian. The arrangements or
agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor
harmiess from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due 1o the
failure of the sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system
. •
Findings for BSP-17•87
Page 3
13 The imai plat dedication will oontain the toilowing statement: "The public water
system, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved by County and State Health
authorities, the locel fire district, County Building 8 Satety Department, and
water purveyor, wili be installed within ihis binding site pian, and the
subdivideNsponsor wfll provide for individual domestic water service as well as
fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a
building permit for each lot "
14. That no building permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Binding Site
Plan until certified by a Washington State licensed engineer "that the water system
has been installed pursuant the approved WATER PLAN for the Final Binding Site
Plan", signed and stamped by said engineer.
15 That a survey is requlred prior to the filing of a final binding site plan.
COUNTY ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS
1. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined
that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the
dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein
specified That conditions of approval of ihe Binding Site Plen by the County
Engineer is given subject to dedication of Right of Way end approval of the road
sytem. In oonjunction wlth phasing of the final Binding Site Plans, specific
conditions appropriate to each phase will be spectfled.
2 The proposed Binding Site Plan shall be tmproved to the standards set forth In
Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended,
which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees In new
construction.
3 The applicant shall deed to spokane County 14' feet of the subject property for Road
Fiight of Way along Sullivan Road and shall construct an additional traffic lane along
Sullivan Road irom Marietta Avenue northward to the intersection of Euclid Avenue
realigned. Construction may be phased as development occurs along ihe Sullivan
Road frontage.
4 The applicant shall deed to Spokane County 48' feet of Right of Way for Marietta
Avenue In the aiignment as shown on the preliminary Binding Stte Plan.
5 Ali required improvements shali conform to the current State of Washington
standard specifications for road and bridge oonstruction and other applicable
County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to road standards and
stormwater management In effect at the date of oonstructlon, uniess otherwise
approved by the County Engineer.
6 Prior to the filing of each phase of the flnal bindtng site plan, appropriate plans,
profiles and cross sections as determtned by the County Engtneer for Sulllvan Road,
Euclid Avenue and/or Marietta Avenue showing proposed street centedine and curb
grades be submitted for approval; road ptans to be prepared under the direction of
Iicensed professionai Civil Engineer. Euclid Avenue road plans and improvement
are to include full depth pavement design and construction (includes existing
travelway connection to Flora Road). That appropriate road drainage plans and
design calculations as determined by the County Engineer showing the alignment of
drainage taciliites be submitted for epproval. Drafnepe plans to be prepered under
the direction oi a licensed professional Civ11 Engineer.
7 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer prior to
the release of a building permit a surface water disposal plan for the building site
or portion thereof If the development Is phased
8 Prior to the release of a building permit, a parking plan and traffic circulation
pian for each site shali be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer
The design, locettion and arrangement of parlcing stells shall be In aocordance with
standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project whfch is to be occupied or
traveled by vehicles.
. 1
Findings for BSP-17-87
Page 4
9 Constructlon wlthin the exlsting or proposed public streets and easements shall be
perlormed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall
turnish the County Engineer with "As 6uilt" plans and e cehificete In writing that
all improvements were inslalled to the lines and grades shown on the approved
construction plans and thet ell disturbed monuments heve been repleced.
10 No construCtion work is to be performed withln the existing or proposed public
right of way unlil a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. Ail work is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
t t All construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be
completed prlor to tiling the tinal binding site plan or a bond in the amount
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the oost of construction of
improvements, constructlon ceni(ication. "As 6uilt" plans and monumenting the
street centeriines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
12 The applicant shall construct Euciid Avenue and Marietta Avenue as shown on the
preliminary binding site plan as public roads. These roadways shall be oonstructed
in compliance wlth the typical roadway cross sections designated and approved by
the Counry Engineer. A copy of those typical cross sections is attached tor inclusion
in the "Conditions of Approvai". All other roadways shown on the preliminary
binding site plan shail be private roads.
13 The change in alignment and vacation of current alignment of Euclid Avenue shall be
approved by the Board of County Commissioners prior to the filinq ot the binding
site pian oontaining that panicular phase oi the development.
- Prior to the acceptance o( ihe new alignment of Euclid Avenue by Spokane County,
the right of way for the new roadway must be deeded to the County and the new
roadwaay constructed per the approved Typial Roadway Cross Section. The vacatlon
f pp of the existing Euclid Avenue will not become final uniil the new alignment is
established by the Board of County Commissioners. The change in alignment and
vacation of the current aiignment of Euclid Avenue shall be approved by the Board
of County Commissioners prior to the filing of the Binding Site Plan coniaining that
particutar phase of the realignment
14 In oonjunction with the realignment ot Euclid Avenue the applicant is responsible
for the reoonstruction of the existing traftic signal system at the Sullivan Road and
realigned Euclid Road intersection and tor ihe oonstruction ot the entlre additional
trafiic lane on Sullivan Road.
15 In conjunctton with the requirements of Short Plat 86-457 the applicant is
responsible tor the future construction of e new treffic signei system et the
intersection of Sullivan Road and Marietta Avenue when the intersectton meets
tratfic engineering warrants for traftic signal construction.
16 That the minimum curb radii at all street intersections withln ihe proposal shall
be 30' feet. Minimum radii at Sulllvan Road intersections shall be 40' feet.
17 To oonstruct the road improvements stated therein, the applicant may, with the
approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any
petilion or resolution which purpose is the tormatlon of a Road Improvement
District (RID) for safd tmprovements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as emended. At
suCh tlme es en RID Is created or eny road Improvement project ts sanctloned by
Spokane County, the improvemenis required (curbs, pathways, drainage control,
paving, traffic signal systems, etc ) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned
owner, lheir heirs, grantees and assigns.
1e Should an RiD be pursued, it shall be the responsibilfty of the appiicant to provide
road and dralnage plans sufflcient tor the creation ot a Road Improvement District
These plans shall be prepared by a licensed protessional civil engineer and shall be
prepared in compliance with Spokane County road standards and drainage
guldellnes.
In order to construct required roadway improvements on Sullivan Road. Marietta
Avenue and Euclid Avenue the appiicant may petition the Board of County
Commissioners to creaie a Road Improvement Dlstrict R.I.D. The RIO must be
created by the Board of County Commissioners prlor to lhe tiling of the bindfng site
plan
. s
. '
Findings tor BSP-17-87
Page S
19 The lollowing statement shall appear on the binding site plan document "Parking
will be prohibited elong Euclid Avenue".
20 A statement shail be placed on ihe binding site plan doucment which prohibits
direct access from lots to Sullivan Road or Flora Road
21 Oirect access from lots to Marietta Avenue and Euclid Avenue shall be limite►d 1o the
access points approved by the County Engineer and as shown on Ihe preliminary
binding site plan
22 A minimum 20' foot wide easement shall be provided along ihe east side of Sullivan
Road and each side of the public road right of way on Euciid Avenue 8nd Madetta
Avenue The purpose of the easement is to aocommodate pathways, landscaping, and
drainage from roadways.
23 A system of pathways, accessible to the public, be constructed along Sullivan Road,
Euclid Road and Marietta Avenue. The pathway fs to be located within the oommon
pathway, drainage and landscepe easement area. That a statement shall be placed on
the binding site plan permitting Spokane County to enter within the easement tor
the purpose of drywell and slgn malntenance. Snow removed from the public
roadways shail be permltted with the easement. Matntenance of pathways, drainage
swales and landscaping areas shall be the responsiblity of the eppllcanl.
24 The proposed private roads as shown on the preliminary binding site pian are
approved by the County En9ineer
25 The following statement musi appear on the binding site plan document: "The
private roads as shown hereon are easements which provide a means of ingress and
egress tor those lots within the btnding site plan heving frontage th+areon."
26 Private road pfans with connections to a pubtic road are the responsibiilty of the
developer and are required prior !o the release of a buitdin9 permit. A statement to
this eftect shall be placed In the binding site plan document
27 Private roads be fmproved lo a minimum lmproved surface width of 30' leet with a
minimum 20' ioot wide landscaping and drainage easement on either side of the
roadway Subject to approval under section 10 207 of the Spokane County Fire
Code
28 Ali vested owners shall sign and reoord private road documenls as prescribed by
the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shali be reviewed end epproved by
the Spokane County Engineer prior to reoording with the Spokane County Auditor.
Recording numbers shall be referenced on the binding site pian dxument.
29 The foilowing statement shall be placed on the binding site plan document:
~WARNING• Spokane County has no responsibility to build, tmprove, maintain or
other wise service the private roads oontained within or providing service to the
property described in ihis bind'+ng site pian. By accepting thls binding site plan or
subsequently by allowing a buildiny permit to be issued on properiy on a private
road, Spokane County assumes no obiigation for said private road end the owners
hereby acknowledge that the County has no obiigation of any icind or nature
whatsoever to establish, examine. survey, construct, alter, repatr, improve,
maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road This requlrement
is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs,
successors or assipns includin9 the obllpetlon to part(clpate In the maintenence of
the private road as provided hereln.
30 The iollowing statement shatl be placed on each phase of the binding site plan: "The
owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authort2e the County to place their
name(s) on a petitfon for the tormation of a Road Improvement Dlstrict (RIO) by
the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, whtch petitlon tncludes the
owner(s) propeny, and lurlher not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the
formation of a RID by the resotution method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW,
which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the
petition or resoluiion method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the
owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or
construction contemplated within the proposed RID is teasible. (2) that the
benefits to be derived from the tormation of the RiD by the property included
therein, together with the amount of any County panicipation, exceeds the cosl and
expense of tormation of the RIO, and (3) that the properly within the proposed RID
is suificiently developed Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall
retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36 88 090, the object to any
assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in
• ti
~ t
Findings for BSP-17-87
Page 6
conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method
under Chapter 36 88 RCW.
COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS
1. A oombined surface water and sewege disposal detailed plan shall be approved by
the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of
any on-siie sewage disposal permit or building permit for this project.
2 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
3 Water service shall be ooordinated through the Director of Utiifties, Spokane
County.
4 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), Stete Department of Sxial 8 Health Services.
5. Prior to filing the flnal piat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies
within the reoorded servtce area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
6. A public sewer system will be made availabie for the project and individual service
will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of indivtdual on-site sewage disposal
systems shall not be authodzed
7. A statement shall be placed In the dedtcation to the effect that: "A public sewer
system wiil be made available tor the project and individual service will be
provided to eech lot prior to sale. Use of indlvidual on-site sewege system shall not
be authorized."
8. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of privete weils end water
systems is prohiblted "
9. The plat dedication will contain a siatement to the effect thet: "The public water
system as approved by County and State heaith authorities and the local fire
district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider wiil
provide for individual domestic water servtce as well as fire protection to each lot
prior to sale of each lot."
COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1 The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or Successor(s) In tnterest agree to
authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petltion for the formation of ULID
by petiiion method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes ihe
Owner(s) property and further no1 to object by the signing of a protest petftion
against the fortnation ot a ULID by resolutbn method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this conditton shall not
prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the
property as a result oi improvements called for In oonjunctlon with the formation
of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.940.
2 Any water service for this project shail be provided In aocordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3 Project will connect to existing Park Sewer Svs~ tem. Review and tnspectlon of the
sewer plans will be the responsibility of the applicant
OILDING 8 SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS
1 The required flre ilow for any building or property development is determined by
building size, type of construction, and proximity of exposures. Required fire
flows shali be based on an evaluation of each building at the time of building permit
application.
2 Project is located withln Fire District No. 1. The required fire flow is determined
by the district.
Findings for BSP-17-87
Page 7
3 Fire hydrants for commercial and industrial buildings shall be located so that no
portion of the building exterior is more than 175' feet from ihe hydrant
4 Fire hydrants shail be bcated so as to be accessible to fire apparatus and not be
obstructed by any structure or vegetation or have the visibillly impaired for a
distance of fifty feet in the direction of vehicular approach to 1he hydrant
5 Specific location of hydrants shall be determined by the Fire Dlstrict
6. The applicant shall provide verification from the Fire District to the Department
of Building and Safety that provisions have been made for adequate Rre protection
prior to the release ot building permits.
DEPARTMENT OF EGOLOGY
1. A new water right appifcation for any new weils wiil probably be required for this
project Please contact Mr. Rynear R. Huffman (509-456-6199) of Ecology's
Eastern Regional Office for furiher Informatlon.
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
1 Water matn extensioNwater system expansions require the appilcant to compiete a
Water System Plan and submit plans and specifications for approval before
construction of the proposed water mains.
~
Approved on day of , 1988
LDOUGLAS
Subdivision Administrator
OC County Engineer
County Utilities
County Health District
County Building 8 Safety
Sponsor
Surveyor
File
Parties of Record
'
.
No. 92 osso
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY CONIlMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF RELEASING )
A DRAINAGE EASEMENT TO ) R E S O L U T I O N
PENTZER DEVELOPMENT )
CORPOR.ATION )
WHEREAS, purauant to the proviaiona of the Revised Code of
Washington, Section 36.32.120 (6) , the Board of County Commieafoners
of Spokane County has the care of County property and the
management of County funds and businees; and
WHEREAS, Pentzer Development Corporation d/b/a Spokane
Induatrial Park (hereinafter referred to as "Pentzer" purportedly
conveyed a drainage eaeement in a portion of Binding Site Plan 88-
21 to Spokane County on June 9, 1992, recorded at Spokane County
Auditora No. 9206090455; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Division of Engineering hae
advised that said eaeement wae conveyed to the County in error,
that said eaeement waa neither requested, accepted or desired by
Spokane County, and that said drainage eaeement ehould be reieased
back to Pentzer; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney's Office has
prepared a document entitled "Release and Quit Claim of Easement"
to release the drainage eaeement back to Pentzer, and which
deecribes said easement with more particularity:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV£D that the Board of County
Commisaionere of Spokane County, be authorized to approve and
execute that certain document entitled "Release and Quit Claim of
Easement", pursuant to which the Board of County Commisaioners
release a drainage easement in a portion of Binding Site Plan 88-
21, purportedly conveyed to Spokane County by Pentzer Development
Corporation d/b/a Spokane Industrial Park, and which easement was
executed to Spokane County in error;
PASSED and ADOPTED this 12th day of May, 1992.
BOAR.D OF COUNTY CONIlKISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
r~ .
Jo R. c ri e, air
~
Patrici ey
0
Stev n saon
ATTEST :
WILLIAM . DONAHUE
Clerk o e Board ,
By
eputy Clerk
. 92 . 0880
RELEAS$ AND QUIT CLAIM OF EASEMENT
SPORANF COUNTY, a political subdiviaion of the State of
Washington, hereby releases and quit claims to PBNTZBR DSVELOPMENT
CORPORATION d/b/a SPORANF INDUSTRIAL PARR (hereinafter referred to
as "Pentzer") any and all interest it may have in the Drainage
Easement purportedly conveyed to Spokane County by Pentzer on June
9, 1992, recorded at Spokane County Auditors No. 9206090455, and
deecribed with particularity on Attachment "A" , attached hereto
and incorporated by reference herein.
Said drainage easement was conveyed to Spokane County by
Pentzer in error and wae neither requested, accepted or desired by
Spokane County.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on behalf of Spokane County, the Board of
County CMday 'ssioners o Spokane County hereby executee this releaae
on this , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY CONIlMISSIONERS
OF SPORANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ATTSST: John R. c ri e, Chair
.
.
WILLI . DONAHUB ,.i
Cler o the Board Patricia ey
By 3Ppufy Clerk Stev H so
STATB OF WASHINGTON )
) se
County of Spokane )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that JOHN
R. MCBRIDE, PATRICIA A. M[JNMEY and STEVEN HASSON, are the persons
who appeared before me, and 8aid persons acknowledged that they
signed thi9 instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to
execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Commiseioners of
the Board of County Commiasionera of Spokane County, a political
subdiviaion of the State of Washington to be the free and voluntary
act and deed of said County, for the uses and purpoaes mentioned in
the instrument, and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of
Spokane County.
SUBSCRIBFD AND SWORN to before me this o?,51aday of June,
1992.
2~ /
~
Notary blic `n and for the
State of Washington, reeiding
at Spokane. My commission ex-
pires 42
4.7el
2-199
8904120063
.
DECLARA.TYON OF COVENANT REQUIRING PRNATE Cl7NSTRUCTION
AND MAINTEN'ANCE OF APPROVED PRIV'ATE ROAD, AND DEDICATIQN
To THEcoUNTYwxErr REQvMEn
DECLA.RATION OF COVENANT
In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of Binding Srte Plan No 21 (hereinafter referxed to as the
"Develapment"), the undersigned covenants and agrees that.
(1) a lot is served Uy a privatQ road when (a) the only road frontia.ge for the lot in the Development is on
the private road, or {b} a lot having frontage on more thaa one road (public or private) constructs an approach ta
the private road
(2) The owner(s) of any lot created by the Uevelapment ar alteration thereof and served bp a gnvate road
shall be responsible for financing the construction and mauntenance of said private rvad.
(3) The rvad shall be imparoved conszstent with Spokane County standards for private roads
(4) Maantenance methods, standards and financing shall be in a manner determ.ined by the owners vf•
(b) the ma41ority of, frontage of lots served by such private
road, (c) or (d)
(b) In the event such private road is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets and the
Caunty is willing to accept the dedicatian of such road, each lvt owner shall execute any dvcuments necessary to
accorriplish such dedication
(6) Qwners of lots vvithin the Development who are served by such rasd, mQy sue and recover damages
and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot wrthin the Develapment which is similarly served who refuses to
part%cipate in the road constructavn, financing, and maintenance
WARNING Spokane County has na responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise
service the private roads contained wnthin or providing service to the propexrty described in this Develapnnent By
accepting this Development or subsequently by allowing a building pernnit to be issued for property on a private
road, Spokane County assumes no obugation for said private road and fi.he owners hereby acknowledg+e that the
County has no obhgation of any kind or nature whatsaever to establish, examine, survey, cvnstru.ct, alter, repair,
impxove, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a pxivate road
(g) This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, theix
heirs, successflrs or assigns, including the obligetion to part.icipate in the msantenance of the pnvate road as
provided herein
IN WITNESS WHEREa I HAVE SET MY HAND AND AFFIXED MY SEAL THIS 3-.7
DAY OF 1989 - J~,.E Q y P. 464 '
SPOKANE INDUSTRIAL PAM INC•
HINGTC)N ) THIS IS TO CEI~,TIFY THAT ON T~ 1~~ DAY OF
STAT+ ~ UF WAS
)SS 19 BEFORE ME, THE UND~ IGNE~j~.~
COUNTY OF SP4K:ANE } A NOTAR'Y PUBLIC, PERSO~NALLY ,sPPEARE ~f~ ,
TO ME KNOWN TO BE THE Wd /-L. ~ OF SPOK:ANE INDUSTRIAL FARK, INC. THE
CQRPQRATIOlv THAT EXECUTED THE F(JREGOiNG INSTRUMENT, AND AGKNt?WLEDGED THE
SAID INSTRtJMENT T4 BE THE FREE ANU VC?LUNTARY ACE AND DEED OF SAID C(3RP4RATI4N
FC?R THE USES AND PURP4SES TZ3EREIN MENTI4NED AND 4I"+C OATH STATED TH.AT HE WAS
AUTHORIZED TO E'XECUTE T SA.II] INS RUMENT ON BEHA.LF OF SAID COR.PORATION
JA.st.-' / _ I
NUTARY PUBLIC IN AND V611 THE STATE OF WASHINGTUN, RESIDING IN SP4KANE
Q3w9
. ' ~ .
. _
Y •
BEFORE THE B4ARD OF OOIAVN 00111QVqSSIONERS FOR SPOKMIE OOUMY
IN THE MATTER OF FIUNG THE FINAL )
PLAT OF BINDING SITE PLAN Bag R E S O L U T 1 O N
PHASE II IN SECTION 12, TOWNS )
NORTH, RANGE 44, E.W.M., SPOKANE )
COUNTY, WASHINGTON )
BE tT RE90LVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINaTON, that the Final Plat of Binding Site Plan BSP•88-21 PHASE II
that ponion of the North half of Sectlon 12, Township 25 North, RanDe 44 E.W.M., Spokane
County, Washington, described as follows:
Commencinq at the North quarter corner of safd Section 12;
thence North 89036155" East, alonq the North line of the North-
east quarter of safd Section 12, a distance of 70.88 feetf -
thence South 0021100" West, a distance of 764.10 feet, to the
South line of deeded Euclid Road, and the true point of begin-
ninqf tllence South 89°49'03" East, alonq said South line, 692.92
feet; thence South 0°21100" West, 620.88 feet; thence South
74059150" West, 990.79 feet; thence South 15000110" East, 250.00
feet to the North right of way line of the Burlinqton Northern
Railroad; thence South 74059150" West, alonq said North line,
2150.00 feet to the Southeast corner of Short Plat 86-457,
recorded in Book 5 on Paqe 37, Spokane County, Washingtonf
thence vorth 0031100" West, alonq the East line of said Shor~
Plat 86-457, 735.68 feet to the Northeast corner thereof; thence
North 89°50'00" West, alonq the North line of safd Shor& Plat
86-457, 361.50 feet feet to the East line of deeded Sullivan
Road; thence North 0°31100" West, alonq said East line, 409.00
feetf thence South 89050'00" East, 1025.00 feet; thence North
0031100" West, 290.00 feetf thence South 84012134" East, 430.29
feet, to a point on a curve to the riqht, the radius of which
bears South 68°59151" East, a distance of 600.00 feet; thence
alonq said curve to the riqht through a central angle of
12027110", an arc distance of 130.40 feet to a point of
tanqency; thence North 33027120" East, 29.98 feet; thence South
75000141" East, 443.83 feet; thence South 86033107" East, 429.20
feet; thence North 0010157" East, 289.00 feet to the South line
of deeded Euclid Road; thence South 89049103" East, alonq said
South line, 267.09 feet to the true point of beqinninq.
More precisely described in the plat dedicatbn, on the recommendatlon of the Spokane County
Hearing Examiner Committee, be, and the same hereby is approved with the exceptfon that the
public rights of way dedicated in this plat wlll not be established for matntenance purposes
until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been tmproved to County standards
and approved by a separate resolution of the Boand of County Commissioners.
. PASSED BY THE 80ARD THI~ a/j- DAY OF , 1989.
B0 OF COUMY COMMISSIONERS
OF E OOIJHTY~ WASHINGTON
~
AITEST:
WILLIAM E. DONAHUE
CLERK OF THE BOARD
By.
.
. '
89 1476
NO.
BEFORE TBE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOK:ANE COUNTY
IN THE NLAITER OF ALTERING FINAL BMING )
STTE PLAN BSP-87-17 IN SECI'ION 12, )
TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 EWM, ) RESOLUTION
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON )
PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILE BSP-87-17A )
WHEREAS, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SFOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, has received a petition from Spokane Industnal Park, wherein the Board is
asked to alter the final binding site plan of BSP-87-17 to reflect:
A. Several lot line adjustments for properties previously leased or sold;
B. Realignment of Euclid Avenue, including recendy approved vacations and dechcations, and
C. Elimination of a pnvate road (4th Street north of Euclid Avenue), based upon a finding that
the applicant owns land to the north and that neither the applicant company nor its lessee,
Columbia Lighting, desires a private road stub from the south; and
WHEREAS, the County Planning Department and other agencies have reviewed the proposed
alteradon and report no objection to it; and
WBEREAS, this consideration of an altered final binding site plan is exempt from the provisions
of the Washington State Environtnental Policy Act, pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (14)(i);
THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Board of Coramissioners of Spokane County that the
drawing of the final binding site plan of BSP-87-17 shall be altered as descnbed above. Such
revised final document shall be known as final BSP-87-17A and be properly filed with the original
to reflect a final binding site plan for BSP-87-17.
PASSED BY THE BOARD this 19th day of Decembe 1989
. .
.
.
A.04
ATTEST:
WII4= UE
CLE By:
REV.11/89 fcu