CUE-41-86/VE-79-86
r ~ +
st-P ~
sPoxANE x ~ ~9p
ZONING ADJUSTOR {~jNFc
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT )
FOR A BOARDING HOME FOR ORGANIC MENTALLY ILL ) FINDIN6S, CONCLUSIONS
PERSONS AND TWO VARIANCES FROM THE STANDARDS ) AND DECISION
AS SET FORTH FOR SUCH A CONDITIONAL USE )
PERMIT. (CUE-41-86 b VE-79-87);)
GERALDINE SARFF )
SUMHARY OF A.PPLICATI4N:
The applicant wishes to establish a boarding home for organic meatally ill
persons. The facility would be licensed as a boardiag home by the Washington
State Departmeat of Social aad Health Services. Sectioa 4.24.040 of the
Spokane County Zoniag Ordiaance allows such a use in the Agricultural Zone
upoa issuance of a conditional use permit for a retirement home, coavalescent
home or nursing home. In 4.24.040 (b) (1) a minimum of three (3) acres is
required, whereas the applicant proposes to use the egisting dwelling uait
(remodeled) existing on the present .43 acres. The Zoning Ordinance aleo
requires, in Section 4.24.040 (b) (2) a standard of 125 feet of lot width at
the building line, whereas the applicant's proposal involves a dwelling unit
which is only 103 feet wide at Che building liae. Authority to consider aad
grant such a request exists pursuant to Sections 4.24.040, 4.04.170 g.,
4.24.010 aad 4.24.040 of the Spokaae County Zoniog Ordinance.
LOCATION:
The property is generally located in Spokane Valley, north of and adjacent to
Mission Avenue (backed-up to I-90 right-of-way), between Progress xoad and
Adams Road in the PJE 1i4 of Seetioa 14, Towaship 25, Range 44. The Assessor's
parcel number is 14541-0908. The property is addreased ae E. 14$19 Miasion
Aveaue.
DECISION OF TEiE ZONING ADJUSTOR:
Based upon the evidence presented aad circumstances associated with the
project proposal, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the coaditional use permit aad
two variances, to .43 acres ia size and to 103 feet of f rontage at the
buildiag line, conditioned as set forth below.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Af ter examining all available informatioa on file with the application and
visitiag the subject property and surrounding area, the Zoning Adjuetor
conducted a public hearing on September 9, 1987, rendered a verbal decision on
September 9, 1987, and a written decision on September 17, 1987.
FINDINGS OF FAC1'
1. The proposal is geaerally located in the Spokane Valley, aorth of and
adjaceaC to Mission Avenue (backed-up to I-90 right-of-way), between Progress
Road and Adams Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 25, Range 44 and is
further described as Asaessor's parcel number 14541-0908, being more
completely described in Zoning Adjustor File #CUE-41-86 and #VE-79-87. The
property is addressed as E. 14819 Mission Aveaue.
,
2. The proposal consists of the convereioa of a single-family dwelling
unit, presently beiag used to provide care for several victims of organic
mental illness who preseatly board/room with the applicant in the dwelling
unit. The proposal would add an addition onto this dwelliag unit to convert
it to a boardiag house, as licensed by the Department of Social and Health
~ •
~ .
, -
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 2
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
Services, aad for approximately 12 occupants. The applicant/owner would no
longer reside in the house, but instead there would be custodial nursing care
provided by an around-the-cloc kstaff who would be aonresident. The facility
would be to either run in two 12-hour shifts or three 8-hour shifts, with only
oae persoa oa duty at a time. The only provision the Spokane Couaty Zoniag
Ordinance has for thie facility is as a coaditional use permit for a
retirement home, coavalescent home or aursing home. This is the section,
4.24.040, uader which the applicant has applied. The standards of this
conditioa require a 3-acre site and 125 feet of width at the building line.
The applicaat's property consists of approximately .43 acres and has oaly 103
feet of width at the building line.
3. The adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan designates the area
of the proposal as Urban and the proposal is coasistent with the County's
entire Comprehensive Plaa, iacludiag the Future Land Uee Plan.
4. The site is zoned Agricultural-Suburban which would allow the
proposed use upon approval of this application.
5. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include Interetate
90 ad,jacent and to Che north, duplexes to the east and the vest and a mixed
resideatial area to the south containing both single family and duplexes, all
of which are compatible with the proposal. The compatibility exists f rom the
standpoint that none of the patients leave the property aad any exercisiag
they are able to do is confined to the rear yard, is very passive aad not
abusive to the neighborhood. The patieats are aot ia any state which may
preseat any harm or danger to resideats of the area or to vehicular traffic.
6. The County Engineering Department expressed concern that patients may
end up walkiag on Mission Aveaue, which has a relatively high traffic volume
and ao sidewalks. Testimony provided ia the hearing iadicated that this will
would aot be the practice and should rarely, if ever, occur.
7. The applicant must bring the house up to atandards of a food
preparation kitchen and must make various remodeling improvements to the
inside to make the structure meet the fire code aad the requiremeats of the
Departmeat of Social and Health Services.
8. The applicant testified that aa architect vould be engaged to prepare
the construction plaas for the dwelling uait so there would be consisteacy of
architectual desiga. The applicant also testif ied that the driveway to the
present garage would more than likely be removed and be seeded to grass or
sodded. A circular driveway would be installed to provide parking f or the
limited number of visitors which call at this type of facility. This type of
facility has opea visiting hours f rom morning until bedtiIDe. Hovever, the
applicaat testif ied that very little visiting takes place, due to the type of
illness involved. Visits are usually of a very short duratioa and come at a
variety of times during the day. The applicant's teetimony was that there
would not be any conflict or traff ic congestioa. The applicaat also described
that during the time of her operatioa over the past few years, there have been
no complaints f rom any neighboriag property owners. There would be a slight
increase in the number of deliveries, particularly for food. Even at that,
there would be ao more than three food deliveries per week aad the laundry
service would contiaue to make only one stop per week.
9. The property owner of the duplex to the east, who residea at another
location, in addition to stating that there was ao objection to this type of
facility, indicated that this kind of facility makea a good neighbor. He had
observed the operation since its iaception and could vouch for the fact that
it does aot disrupt the neighborhood or otherwise cause adverse effects.
10. There is no record that a conditional use pera4lt aad/or variance has
ever beea granted for this type of boarding facility in Spolcaae Couaty,
outside of the City of Spokane. Seve ral are reported to be located within the
City of Spokane.
. .
. ~
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION r1ND DECISION PAGE 3
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
11. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, the environmeatal
chec klist and other data have been reviewed and the project has been found not
to have any probable significant adverse impacts to the physical environment.
A Determinatioa of Nonsigaificance (DNS) was issued on August 11, 1987 aad
sent to twelve (12) ageacies of jurisdiction. The agencies reviewiag the
checklist neither indicated that a more detailed eavironmeatal review should
be provided nor commeated that the DNS should be reconsidered. Commeats
regarding environmental matters were aot made at the public hearing. There
was not sufficient evidence presented pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (3) (a) to
withdraw the DNS.
12. The applicant has beea made aware of the recommendations of various
CountyfState agencies reviewing this project and has indicated she can comply
with those recommeadations.
13. The proposed site plan indicates tha[ setbacks, parking, height of
the structure(s) will coaforaa to the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The
proposed site plaa indicates adequate parking for at least 4 vehicles, one of
which would be that of the single employee. Given the low level of
visitations and the limited number of deliveries, the proposed parking and the
loop driveway provides adequate off-street parking and delivery space. Refer
to the site plaa approved for substantial conformance, as contained in the
file. It indicates 4 parking stalls on an approximately 20-foot-wide circular
driveway. This provides approximately 10 feet of clear drive through 8pace
for delivery trucks. The approved site plan also indicates low-lying
landscaping with up to 3 dwarf floweriag trees to be provided between the
driveway and the street, as well as removal of the existing driveway aad
returaiag of it to seeded or sod turf.
14. No one appeared to oppose the proposal nor were any written comments
adverse to the proposal received.
15. The proper legal requirements for advertisiag of the hearing before
the Zoning Adjustor of Spo kane County have been met.
16. Aay coaclusion hereiaafter stated which may be deemed a f inding
herein is hereby adopted as such.
From the Findiags, the Zoning Adjustor comes to these:
CONCLUSIONS
1. The variances will not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in the
zone.
2. With the conditioas of approval set forth below, the variances will:
a) aot constitute a grant of special privileges inconsiatent with limitations
on other properties in the vicinity aad similar zone; b) ensure that the
intent and purpose of the Zoniag Ordinance is achieved with regard to
location, site design, appearance, aad landscaping, etc; and c) protect the
environment, public interest and geaeral welfare.
3. There are special circumstances applicable to the property which,
when combined with the staadards of the Zoning Ordinance, create pcactical
difficultiee for the uee of the property and/or deprive the property of tighta
and privileges common to other properties in the viciaity aad simiiar zone
classifications. The authors of the Zoaing Ordinaace did not aaticipate that
it may one day be preferred to care for organic meatally ill persons such as
these, in a small more intimate atmosphere, as opposed to a large
institution. Hence, the Zoning Ordinance falls victim to outdated language
with regard to the "state of the art" practice of caring for persoas with
these mentally debilitating diseases.
4. Granting the variances will be neither materially detrimental to the
public welfare nor injurious to property or improvements in the viciaity and
zone. There was, in fact, testimony that this property aad its use was a very
compatible neighbor concept.
y ~
. .
~
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 4
GER.ALDINE SARP'F; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
5. Strict application of the zoaing standards does create an
unreasonable burden in light of the purpose to be served by the standards.
Ability to care for persons in this state of inental debilitatioa far outweighs
any evident negative effects of this project.
6. A broader public need or interest will be served by graating verses
denying the variances.
7. The case for the variancea was not supported by substantial reference
to or reliance upoa legal or nonconformiag precedent(s).
8. Granting the variances will not adversely affect the overall zoning
designr plaa or concept for either the immediate area or the entire Couaty.
9. The case for a variances was not based substantially upon a lack of
reaeonable economic return nor a claim that the existing structure is too
small.
10. Graating of the variances will aot be inconsistent with the geaeral
purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
11. The grantiag of the variaaces will not result in defacto zone
reclassificatioa.
12. The requested variances are not substantially for the purpose of
circumventing density regulatioas designed to protect the Spokane
Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer.
13. The proposal is listed ia the Spokaae County Zoning Ordinaace as a
conditional use allowed in the Agricultural zone and the proposal, as set
forth, does not meet the established aad applicable criteria described for
that conditional use. However, the applicant has sought variances f rom the
two standards in which the proposal is not consisteat with the standards.
14. Various performance standards aad crtteria are addizioually needed to
make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity
aad zone and to ensure agaiast imposiag exceasive demaads upon public
utilities aad these shall be addressed as conditions of approval.
15. The proposal will not be detrimental to the Comprehensive Plan or the
surrounding properties.
16. The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as
aecessary aad appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public
interest aad geaeral welfare.
17. Any fiadiag hereinbefore stated which may be deemed a conclusion
herein is adopted as such.
DECISION
The conditional use permit is granted in perpetuity to the property, but
shall become null and void if the boarding house ceases for 365 coasecutive
daye. From the foregoing Findings and Conclusiona, the Zoning Adjustor
APPROVES the proposal, including actiag on behalf of zhe Subdivision
Administrator to approve the associated Certificate of Exemption(s). The
followiag CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE STIPULATED.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. GENERAI,
1. The following conditioas shall apply to the applicant, owner and
successors in interest.
t ~
. .
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 5
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
2. Failure to comply with any of the conditions of approval contained ia this
deciaion, except as may be relieved by the Zoaing Adjustor, shall
constitute a violation of the Zoning Ordinance and be subject to such
eaforcement actions as are appropriate.
3. The Building and Safety Department shall assist in coordination of this
decision by routing building permiC application(s) to the various
departments which participate ia or take actioas to easure that various
required written documents have been executed and filed.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The development of the site shall occur in substantial conformance to the
site plan as approved by the Zoaing Adjustor on September 14. 1987. This
includes a circular driveway approximately 20 feet in width, the removal
of the existing driveway and the committmeat of that land to seed or to
sod and the installation of low lying landscape betweea the driveway and
the f roat property line as iadicated on the site plan. Note that up to 3
dwarf flowering trees may be located ia that landscapiag circle; the point
is to aot obstruct the vision of people entering and leaving.
2. If the Zoning Ad,justor believes there are extenuating circumstances
associated with the renewal of the permit, he/she may cause there to be s
public hearing and reconsideration of the permit; the expense shall be
that of the County if euch reconsideration takes place.
3. The proposal shall be established in substantial conformance with the site
plaa approved September 14, 1987 on file ia the Plaaning Department and
any modification of the proposed location aad plans shall only be
authorized by the Zoning Adjustor.
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY
1. The Buildiag and Safety Department shall assist in coordiaation of this
decision by routing building permit application(s) to the various
departmeats which participate in or take actions to ensure that various
required written documeats have been executed and filed.
2. The applicant shall provide written verif icatioa f rom Fire District #1 to
the Department of Buildiag & Safety that provisions have been made for
adequate fire protection prior to the release of building permits.
IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
None is applicable.
V. HEALTH DISTRICT
1. A combined surface water aad sewage disposal detail plan shall be approved
by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spolcane County Health District
prior to the iesuance of aay building permits for this project.
2. Water service ehall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities,
Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by aa existing public water aupply whea approved by
the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health
Services.
i ~
~ . .
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 6
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
4. Pursuaat to the Board of County Commissioners Resolutioa No. 80-041 8, the
use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This
authorization is conditioned oa compliance with all rules and regulatioas
of the Spokane Couaty liealth District and is further conditioned and
subject to specific applicatioa approval aad issuance of permits by the
Health Officer.
5. Sub,ject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the
Health Officer, the use of an iadividual on-site sewage system may be
authorized.
VI. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detail plan shall be approved
by the Spokane County Engineer aad the Spokane Couaty Health District
prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project.
2. The owner(s) or successor(s) ia interest must obtaia aa approach permit
f rom the Couaty Engineer prior to the construction of any new access to
the county road.
VII. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTfl SEBVICES
l. The applicant shall work with the Department of Social and Health Services
aad obtain all necessary periaits f rom DSHS and ahall improve the building
to construction standards as specified by DSHS.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPBOVAL WHICH NEED TO BE
COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS CAN BE RELEASED PRIOx TO THE LAPSE
OF THE (10) DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVEit, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR
EXPENSES AND INCOATVLNIENCE INCURRED 8Y THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT A.PPROVAL
IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON A.PPEAL.
DATED TflIS 1. 1'H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. ~
17
Thomas G. M r, AICP
Zoning Adju t r, Spokane County
Washington
FILED: ~
1) Applicant
2) Parties of Record 3) Spokane County Engineering Department v
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Utilities Dept.
6) Spokane County Dept. of Building & Safety
7) Planning Dept. Cross Reference File and/or Electronic File.
8) Department of Social and Health Services; Attn: Fred Roundtree
NOTE: ONLY THE A.PPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN
TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE A.BOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, B1t0ADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, N. 721 JEFFERSON ST., SPOKANE,
WA 99260. (Sections 4.25.090 aad 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoniug
Ordinance).
0042z/9-87
, .
d ~
sPo~a8 1987
ZONING ADJUSTOR ^'~'~~aFr
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT )
FOR A BOARDING HOME FOR ORGANIC MENTALLY ILL ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS
PERSONS AND TWO VARIANCES FROM THE STANDARDS ) AND DECISION
AS SET FORTEi FOR SUCH A CONDITIONAL USE )
PERMIT. (CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87);)
GERALDINE SARFF )
SUMHARY OF APPLICATI4N:
The applicant wishes to establish a boarding home for orgaaic mentally ill
persons. The facility would be licensed as a boarding home by the Washington
State Department of Social and tiealth Services. Sectioa 4.24.040 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordiaance allows such a use in the Agricultural Zoae
upon issuance of a conditional use permit for a retirement home, coavalescent
home or aursing home. Ia 4.24.040 (b) (1) a minimum of three (3) ac res is
required, whereas the applicaat proposes to use the exiating dwelling uait
(remodeled) exiating on the preseat .43 acres. The Zoniag Ordiaance also
requires, in Section 4.24.040 (b) (2) a standard of 125 feet of lot width at
the buildiag line, whereas the applicant's proposal involves a dwelliag unit
which is only 103 feet wide at the building line. Authority to consider and
grant such a request exists pursuant to Sections 4.24.040, 4.04.170 g.,
4.24.010 and 4.24.040 of the Spokane Couaty Zoning Ordinance.
LOCATION:
~
The property is generally located 1a Spokane Valley, north of and adjacent to
Mission Avenue (backed-up to I-90 right-of-way), between Progress Road and
Adams Road ia t!:e NE 1/4 of Sectioa 14, Township 25, Range 44. The Assessor's
parcel aumber is 14541-0908. The property is addressed as E. 14819 Miesioa
Aveaue.
DECISION OF THE ZONING A.DJUSTOR:
Based upon the evidence presented aad circumstaaces associated with the
project proposal, the Zoning Adjustor A.PPROVES the conditional use permit and
two variances, to .43 acres in size and to 103 feet of f rontage at the
building line, conditioned as set forth below.
PUBLIC HEA1tING:
After examinia,g all available infonaation on file with the application and
visiting the subject property and surroundiag area, the Zoning Adjustor
conducted a public heaziag oa September 9, 1987, rendered a verbal decisioa on
September 9, 1987, and a written decisioa on SepCember 17, 1987.
FINDINGS OF FAC1'
l. The proposal is geaerally located in the Spokane Valley, norCh of aad
adjacent to Mission Avenue (backed-up to I-90 right-of -way), between Progress
Road and Adams Road in the NE 114 of Section 14, Township 25, Raage 44 aad is
further deacribed as Assessor's parcel aumber 14541-0908, beiag more
completely described in Zoaing Adjuator File #CIJE-41-86 and #VE-79-87. The
property is addressed as E. 14819 Missioa Aveaue.
2. The proposal consists of the coaversion of a single-family dwelling
uait, presently being used to provide care for several victims of orgaaic
caental illness who presently board/room with the applicant in the dwelliog
unit. The proposal would add an addition onto this dwelling uait to coavert
it Co a boardiag house, as liceased by the Department of Social and Health
4 ~
~ FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 2
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
Services, and for approximately 12 occupants. The applicaat/owner would no
loager reside in the house, but instead there would be cu8todial aureiag ca re
provided by an arouad-the-clock staff who would be noaresideaC. The facility
would be to either run in two 12-hour shifts or three 8-hour shifts, with only
one persoa on duty at a time. The only provision the Spokaae County Zoniag
Ordinance has for this facility is as a coaditional use permit for a
retirement home, coavalescent home or nursing home. This is the section,
4.24.040, under which the applicant hae applied. The standards of this
condition require a 3-acre site and 125 feet of width at the building liae.
The applicant's property consists of approximately .43 acres and has only 103
feet of width at the building liae.
3. The adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan desigaates the area
of the proposal as Urban and the proposal is coasiatent with the County's
eatire Compreheasive Plan, includiag the Future Land Use Plaa.
4. The site is zoned Ag ricultural-Suburban which would allow the
proposed use upon approval of this applicatioa.
5. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal iaclude Interstate
90 ad,jaceat and to the aorth, duplexes to the east and the west aad a mixed
residential area to the south containing both aiagle family and duplexes, all
of which are compatible with the proposal. The compatibility exists froat the
standpoint that none of the patients leave the property aad anq exercisiag
they are able to do is confined to the rear yard, is very passive aod aot
abusive to the neighborhood. The patients are not in aay state which may
preseat aay harm or danger to residents of the area or to vehicular traffic.
6. The County Eagiaeering Departmeat expressed concera that patieats may
end up walkiag on Missioa Aveaue, which has a relatively high traffic volume
and no sidewalks. Testimoay provided ia the heariag indicated that this will
vould not be the practice aad should rarely, if ever, occur.
7. The applicaat must bring the house up to standards of a food
preparation kitchea and must make various remodeling improvements to the
iaside to makre the structure meet the fire code and the requirements of the
Department of Social and Health Services.
8. The applicant testif ied that an architect would be engaged to prepare
the construction plans for the dwelling uait so there would be consisteacy of
architectual desiga. The applicant also testified that the driveway to the
preseat garage would more than li kely be removed and be seeded to grass or
sodded. A circular driveway would be installed to provide parking for the
limited number of visitors which call at this type of facility. This type of
facility has open visiting hours f rom morning uatil bedtime. However, the
applicaat testif ied that very little visiting takes place, due to the type of
illness involved. Visits are usually of a very short duration and come at a
variety of times duriag the day. The applicant's teatimony waa that there
would not be any conf lict or traFf ic congestion. The applicant also described
that during the time of her operatioa over the past few years, there have been
no complaiats frora any neighboriag property owaers. There would be a slight
increase in the nu,aber of deliveries, particularly for food. Even at that,
there would be no more thaa three food deliveries pe r week aad the laundry
service would continue to make only one sCop per week.
9. The property owner of the duplex to the east, who resides at another
location, in addition to stating that there was no objection to this type of
facility, indicated thaC this kiad of facility makes a good neighbor. Iie had
observed the operation since its inception and could vouch for the fact that
it does not diarupt the neighborhood or otherwise cause adverse effects.
10. There is no record that a coaditional use pe rmit aad/or variance has
ever been granted for this type of boarding facility in Spokaue County,
outside of the City of Spokane. Several are reported to be located within the
City of Spokaae.
\
` FINUINGS, CONCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 3
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
11. Pursuant to the State Environiaental Policy Act, the environmeatal
chec klist and other data have been reviewed and the project has beea found not
to have any probable signif icant adverse impacts to the physical eavironment.
A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on August 11, 1987 aad
sent to twelve (12) agencies of jurisdiction. The agencies reviewiag the
chec klist neither indicated that a more detailed environmental review should
be provided nor commeated that the DNS should be reconside red. Commeats
regarding environmental matters were not made at the public hearing. There
was not sufficient evidence presented pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (3) (a) to
withdraw the DNS.
12. The applicant has beea made aware of the recommeadations of various
Co,untyfState agencies reviewiag this project aad has indicated she can comply
witn those recommendations.
13. The proposed site plan indicates that setbacks, parking, height of
the structure(s) will conform to the Spokane Couaty Zoaing Ordinance. The
proposed site plan indicates adequate parking for at least 4 vehicles, one of
which would be that of the single employee. Given the low level of
visitations and the limited number of deliveries, the proposed parking and the
loop driveway'provides adequate off-street parking and delivery space. Refer
to the site plaa approved for substantial conformance, as coatained ia the
file. It indicates 4 parking stalls on an approximately 20-foot-wide circular
driveway. This provides approximately 10 feet of clear drive through space
for delivery trucks. The approved site plan also indicates low-lying
landscaping with up to 3 dwa rf flowering trees to be provided between the
driveway and the street, as well as removal of the existiag driveway and
returning of it to seeded or sod turf.
14. No oae appeared to oppose the proposal nor were any written comments
adverse to the proposal received.
15. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before
the Zoning Adjustor of Spokaae County have been met.
16. Any coaclusion hereinafter stated which may be deemed a fiading
herein is hereby adopted as such.
From the Findiags, the Zoaiag Adjustor comes to these:
CONCLUSIONS
1. The variances will not authorize a use othe rwise prohibited ia the
zone.
2. With the conditioas of approval set forth below, the variances will:
a) not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with limitations
on other properties ia tne vicinity and similar zone; b) enaure that the
intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is achieved with regard to
location, site design, appearaace, and landscaping, etc; aad c) protect the
envirocuaent, public interest and general welfare.
3. There are special circumstances applicable to the property which,
when combined wiCh the standards of the Zoning Ordinance, create practical
difficultiee for the use of the property and/or deprive the property oP rights
and privileges common to other properties in the viciaity and similar 2one
classificatioas. The authors of the Zoaing Ordinaace did not anticipate that
it may one day be preferred to care for organic caentally ill persons such as
these, in a small more intimate atmosphere, as opposed to a large
institution. Hence, the Zoniag Ordinance falls victim to outdated language
with regard to the "etate of the art" practice of caring for persons with
these mentally debilitating diseases.
4. Granting the variances will be neither materially detrimental to the
public welfare nor injurious to property or improvements in the viciaity and
zone. There was, ia fact, testimony that this property aad its use was a very
compatible aeighbor coacept.
~
~ •
~
FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 4
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VL-79-87
5. Strict application of the zoaiag standards does create an
unreasonable burden in light of the purpose to be served by the staadarde.
Ability to care for persons in this state of inental debilitation far outweighs
any evident negative effects of this project.
6. A broader public need or interest will be served by graating verses
denyiag the variaaces.
7. The case for the variances was not supported by substantial reference
to or reliance upon legal or noaconfonaing precedent(s).
8. Graating the variaaces will aot adversely affect the overall zoaiag
deaignr plan or concept for either the immediate area or the entire Couaty.
9. The case for a variaaces was not based substaatially upon a lac k of
reasonable economic return nor a claim that the existing structure is too
small.
10. Granting of the variances will not be iaconsieteat with the general
purpose and intent of the Compreheasive Plan.
11. The graating of the variaaces will not result ia defacto zoae
reclassification.
12. The requested variances are not substaatially for the purpose of
circumventing deasity regulatioas designed to protect the Spokane
Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer.
13. The proposal is listed ia the Spokane County Zoniag Ordinanae as a
conditional use allowed in the Agricultural zoae and the proposal, as set
forth, does aot meet the established and applicable criteria described for
that conditional use. Howeve r, the applicaat has sought variaaces f rom the
two standards ia which the proposal is not consistent with the standards.
14. Various performance standards and criteria are additiotially needed to
make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity
and zone and to ensure against imposiag excesaive demands upon public
utilities and these shall be addressed as conditions of approval.
15. The proposal will not be deCrimental to the Comprehensive Plaa or the
surroundiag properties.
16. The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as
necessary and appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public
interest aad general welfare.
17. Any findiag hereinbefore stated which may be deemed a conclusion
hereia is adopted as such.
DECISION
The conditional use permit is granted in perpetuity to the property, but
shall become null aad void if the boarding house ceases for 365 conaecutive
days. From the foregoing Findings and Concluaioae, the Zoning Ad3uetor
A.PPROVES the proposal, iacludiag actiag on behalf of the Subdivisioa
Administrator to approve the associated Certificate of Exemptioa(s). The
following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE STIPULATED.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I. GENERAL
1. The following conditiona shall apply to the applicant, owner and
successors ia interest.
f
, .
.
` FINDINGS, CONCLUSLON ANll DECISION PAGE 5
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-$6 & VE-79-87
2. Failure to comply with any of the coaditions of approval contaiaed in this
deciaion, except as may be relieved by the Zoning Ad,justor, shall
co,astitute a violation of the Zoaing 4rdiaaace and be Subject Co auch
enforeement activns as are appropriate.
3, The Building and Safety Departmeat shall assist in coordinatioa of this
decision by routing building permit application(s) to the various
departments which partieipate ia or take actioas to ensure that various
required wrirten docwnents have been executed and filed.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The developmeat of the site shall occur in substantial coaformance to the
site plan as approved by the Zoning Adjustor oa September 14. 1987. This
iacludes a circular driveway approximately 20 feer in width, the removal
of the existing driveway and the committment of that laad to seed or to
sad and the insCallation of low lying landscape between the driveway aad
the front properry line as indicated oa the site plan. Note that up to 3
dwarf flowering trees may be located in that landscapiag circle; the point
is to not obstruct the vision of people enteriag aad leaving.
2. If the Zoning AdjusCar believee there are extenuaCing circumstaaces
associated wiCh the reaewal of the permit, he/she may cauae there to be a
public hearing and recoasideration of the permiC; the expease shall be
that of the Cvuaty if such reconsideratioa Cakes place.
3. The proposal shall be established ia substantial conformance with the aiCe
plaa apprvved September 14, 1981 on file in the Planning Department and
any modificativn of the prvposed locatioa and plaas ehall only be
authorized by the Zoning Adjustor.
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUII.DING & SA.FETY
1. The Building and Safety Department shall assist in coardiaatioa of this
decision by routiag building permit applicatlon(s) to Che various
departments which participate in or take actions tv ensure that varioua
required written dacumeata have beea executed and filed.
2. The applicant shall provide written verificatioa f rom Fire Y?istrict #1 to
the DeparCmeat of Buildfng b Safety that provisions have been made for
adequate fire prorectiaa prior to the release of building permiCss.
IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Noae is applicable.
V. HEALTH DISTRICT
1. A eambined surface water and aewage disposal detail plan shall be approved
/ by the Spokane Couaty Engineer aad the Spokane County Health District
prior to the issuaace of aay building permit8 for thie project.
2. Water service shall be coordinated thraugh the Director of Utilitiest
Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existiag public water supply whea approved by
the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Soctal and Health
Services.
. ,
•
j FINDINGS, C4NCLUSION AND DECISION PAGE 6
GERALDINE SARFF; CUE-41-86 & VE-79-87
4. Pursuant to the Board of Couaty Commissioners Resolution No. 80-04181 the
use of on-site sewer disposal sysCems is hereby authorized. This
authorization is conditioned oa compliance with all rules aad regulatioas
of the Spokane CounCy tiealth District and is further conditioned and
subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the
Health Officer.
5. Subject to specific application approval and issuaace of permits by the
Health Off icer, the use of an iadividual on-site sewage system anay be
authorized.
VI. ENGINEERING DEPAttTMENT
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detail plaa ahall be approved
/ by the Spokane County Eagineer and the Spokane County Health District
prior to the issuance of any building permits for this project.
2. The owner(s) or successor(s) in iaterest must obtain an approach pei'a4it
f rom the Couaty Eagineer prior eo the construction of any new acceas to
the countyr road.
VII. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTEI SERVICES
1. The applicant shall work with the Department of Social and Health Services
aad obtain all necessary permits f rom DSHS aad shall improve the building
to coastruction standards as specified by DSHS.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL W1iICH NEED TO BE
COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS CAN BE RELEASED PxIOx TO THE LA.PSE
OF TtIE (10) DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER, TtiE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR
EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE A.PPLICANT IF THE PROJECT A.PPBOVAL
LS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL.
DATED THIS H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1987. ~
I7
taaauaF 2&E90_**'
Thomas G. M r, AICP
Zoning Ad~u t r, Spokane Couaty
Washington
~
FILED:
1) Applicant
2) Parties of Record
3) Spokaae County Engineering DepartmentY
4) Spokane Couaty Health District
S) Spokane County Utilities Dept.
6) Spokane County Dept. of Building b SaFety
7) Planning DepC. Cross Refereace File and/or Electronic File.
8) Departmeat of Social and Health Services; Attn: Fred RoundCree
NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPFONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN
TEN (14) CALENDAFt DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT TEIE SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, N. 721 JEFFERSON ST., SPOKANE,
WA 99260. (Sections 4.25.090 aad 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoniag
Ordinance).
0042z/9-87
i
QFFTGE OF THE CaUNTY ENGINEER
SFOE".ANE GOUNTYq WASHINGTON
5-27-87
T0: SPQt'ANE CQUNTY ZONING AAJUSTOR
FROM4 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGTNEER ;
SUBJ: CUE 41-87 (SARFF)
WE HAVC REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERF_NCED APF'LICATIqM AND THE pSSOCIATED
ENVIRQNMENTAL CHECF:LIST. WE UO NOT FTND IN THE GHECKLTST DOCUMENT OR THE
APPLIGATIQN ANY MENTInN OF THE AMBULATORY STATUS QF THE FUTURE RESIDENTS OF
THE F'RQFOSC bOARDxNG HAMEo
MISSIQN AVENUE IS COUNTY ARTERIAL WHICH CARRIES OVER 3000 TRIPS PER DAY,
THEFE ARE NOT ANY SIDEWALKS ALaNG MISSION AUENUE Inl TME VIGINITY OF THE
PRQPdSALn WE AFE CONCERNED ABOUT PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC FROM THE BOARDING FiOME
USING MISSION AVEhIUE CTVEN THE TYF'ICAL TNDIVIDUAL F'ROFILE PRESENTED IN THE
APRLICATTON AND THE CHEGkLIST. FERFIAPS UUR CONGERNS COULD BE ADDRESSED AT
TNE PUPLIC HEARING.
4
.
~
. ~
,t
t' 4g01
glimmol
,
,
,
.
• ~ Z
s
-
~
, . -
~ •
1 ~ r
~i- ~ r i •
~
1 '
~
CARpER
t Zi re'~' = •r ' ~ = ~.s ..s
.
• ~ -i_ ~
E ~
AV&
.
7~ t ~t;s
i~ ~ • ~ .
♦ ~ r •
o ~ ~ ~ •
z
• ~ ~ T~ d ~
r 4 ~
ac ~C 4 d ` . ' t
14 . .
.
~ ~ ' q
r; . . r
` ' ' .1 ~ ~ 5,4.
►
~ ;
.
a '
~
_
~ ~ .
at ~
.
• - °
~ ~ ~ " ~
~ `r°s1000 ~
' ~ ~ r w•vt ~
.~.s•"' ~ ~ `
, t
' V •
~ ~ •
• ' Z~i2
_ ~
p6E
- ' Ns ~34T
~ n'`\,
- ~ ~ ~~f •
ii
• - Z
,
~
- _ • -
~ r' .
.
r •
, ~ ~ _
~ARDER
~ ~s~, r~i_-•s~,~. ~...,r - _ +
!
r ~
40 i - s•..
•
t N
VE -
IWAMI
s
Q 4
N ~,,.•,w S ~
r ~
. ~
r
' •s
.
.'~r o► a A~„~ ~ . •
~ • ~
a • ~
~ 0 ~ r~ ; r q
f . . s • • .G ~ ~
• . .
t- • ;
~ ; r
~ ~ ♦
~
4S ,
.
.
.
1 iooo '
v,~,"' + < ~ + w~v! '
t
4 '
. +
. '
• Zj12
. • Nt
.
,
. ~r , .
~
ENTAL
~1K
N
~
ENVIR
,
IECKLIS°r ~
'CI_
. ,
~
,
~ t
~
q,POKAIV ' E E1eTVIRONAIIENTAL ORDINANCE
,SECTIO~N 110100230(1)
~
~
,
'I
,
~
~
,
~
,
a ~
. •
tFOKAVR MVIRONNMFZAL QRDINANO
(MAC 197-11-960) 8eetion I1 10.230(1)
i
i
Enviromentel Cheekliet
i
Pile No
Fnrposa of Cheekliots
The Stste Bnvironmental Pollcy Act (8BPA) chepter 63.21C RCW. requiree ell governmental egencies to conaider the environmentel lmpecte of a proposal
before meking decisloae. An Bnviroameatal Impact Statemeat (BIS) muet be prepared for all propoeale vith ptobeDle elgniEicant advesee impacte on
tbe quality of the savlroameac The putpoae of tAle cAeckliei !e to provlde information to help you aad RRe egeney identiEy impaets from your
propoeal (end to reduce or svoid lmpacte from the propoeal. if it cao be done) end to help the ageney decid4 vhether ea EIS is cequtred
Iaetivctiona for Applicaetss
iAio euvirotim+eatal checkliet eeke you to descriDe eme basic iafoemetion about your propoeal. Coveramental agencies nse thie cdeckliet to Qetenmioe
v6ethes ttee envicoaveatel impacts of your propoeal ere sigaificant. reqnisiag preperation of aa BIS. Answer the queetione bsiefly, vich tle moet
Preeiee infosmation knams or give the best deeeriptioa you cen
You suet ansver each questioa eccurataly and cerefullq, to t6e beet of yous kaaMledge. In moet caeee, yoa ebould be able to snever tAe questione
Eroa your ovn obsecvatione or psoject plana vithout the aeed to btse e:perte If you reelly do oot knov the aaever, or if e question doee not apply
to your proposal, vrite "do aot Imar' os 'dces IIot apply.' Complete enevere to the qneetiona aov mey avoid uaneceseat7r delaye leter
8ome aunotioae aek about goverameatal cegulettone. aucb ae soaing, ehoreliae, end lendmerk deeigoetions. AneMer theBe questione if you can. If you
heve probleme, tde governmental ageneiee can aeeiet you.
'ilu cheekliet queetloae apPly to ell parte of your propoeal. evea !f you plan to do them over a period of time or oa differeat percela of laad
Attacd anq nddltioml letoemstioa thst vill descsibe your prapoael or !te envlroomental effecta ?he egency to vhieb you submit this cDeckllst may
aak yau to explala your aaevero or provide additioael infoematioa reeeonably releted to deteemining !i there may be aigniflcant adverse impact
Oae oi cbectlist tos nouproject p:opo"lss
Camplete thi• cbeeklint for nonpcoiect propo"le, eveo tAougb pueuioae maq ee eoswered "doea not apply".
IN 11DDI2IOR. camplete tAe SUP?L&MEN?AL 8MW tCR HOlWBOJBCt AClIOHS(Part D)
Por aonpro,fect actioao, the sefesauces in the eAecklist to tha Yeede "project." 'aoplicant." and "property or eite" ehould be resd ee "pcopoeel,'
. propoaer," and "affected geographic erea.' reepeetively
A. HAQIC8p11HD
1. Name of propoeed projeet. !f epplice6le
2 Nsas of Appliceat ~ Q rA
~ y ►
3. llddress aad phoae aumDsr of aOpiicant or eoataet person:
2 t
4 Date eleckiist pneparedc ~
. '
S. AgeQCy nQnesting cAeckllat
6. Proposed Wiog or schedule (loeludiog oha~iag. if app2lcable):
I-e/l ~ 7 ` 7. a. Do you heve any plana for future itiono, eupanslon. or fnrther actiM tp teleted to or comtected vith tbie propoeal? If qes. espldn.
~ in r
•
b. Do you orn r ave optio aa lacd aearby or adjauat to Ai• proposal4 If ges. etplalo.
8. Liet aay eavironmatal infomatioa roa koov aAout thet hae been prepered, or eill be prepered, ditectly related to thie propoeal
uV-
, A4`
i_
.
/POwra UvuAOMMw. oaDINMCe
(fl/►C 197-11-96+0) 8aetson u.10.230t,>
. BACKCROUND ttontxnuedy
9 Oo pau knev vhether applieatioua •ra gerding for gavermeotal approvala of ather prngosaL direc[ly aifecciag the prnperty covered by yair
psoposalt If yae, eaplsin. .
i
10 List aaq goaermwpt appcovale or permfts that vill ba needcgd for your propaael. if knovn
Y7
12. Give brief, eamplete deocrlptian of yaair propoaal. inciu4ing the proposed usea sad the si:e of the project and •ite ihere ere eeveral
aue.cio►ts later in tAis cAaaklist thrt ask pou Ra disscribe certaia aapeeta of yaas propoaal You do aot nead to repeat thosa msvers on thie
pas~
7;7o atd,.M J P41
.
.40
' rJ►'ali~.i' ,r
'7&
. ,
Aft
le!'K 54
1D
i
~ •
12. Locatioo of t opaaal. Glva ruff nt ia!`ossation to a person uadersqad the ateciss locatiao oY yaur pragos pro,~cet. incindi a
stneet aQdresa. it any, aud Qection, tawaahip and raoge, if Imoira If a proposal would oeeur over a raage of area. provide tfu range or
pawadsrles at tW •ite (s). Providt • lagal deacriptioa, mite pUo, aieinitp map, and topograpbic map. if reasanibly avalleble 1lhile yau
akould au6olt anp plana cequlcad bp tha agency, you •t* not t+equitad to dnplitate maps or detailed plans rutuoitted t►ith any pecmit eppllcation
relaced ro Wia cbscklist.
' r
13. Does the psoposed aetioo 1ie vithio tte Aqui#`er 8eruiti rrt (AS1)! lhe Cewral 8erer Setr~e Areat 'ihe P:iority Servfce AseeY lhe
City oi Bpeka mtp (Bea: Spakaae Geawty'• /SA OverLy tOP6 Attap for bouadaeias). /
l
ra ea oaPtaisD st AFMicAUrt
a. B"naoNKSHM Et,eaEM
Eralwtion Pot
Agencr vse tTalp
i sAsm
a Ceneral deseription ot the site (circle ooe)a a tallfog, hiily, •teep siopea, mountainous. _
athesa
► Ifiat th~ teepeat dapi on ihe te (appro tmate pa at slope)T
c Mhte general typeo a oils are fauad oa the sits (Eor exwrple, cley, aand, grsvel, peat, muck)i
If yar koor the claoaificMtion af agricultural saila, specify then amd Z~Lllf y pr1= f rm1acd
cr
d Are there surface lodicatioar or hiatory of uneteble aoils lo the immcdiate vicinity4 If sa.
deaeribe
U
~
• SfKYNO N•MYiMUW OuYuim
(YAC 197-11-960) 8ectlod 11.10 230(1) V
6
B. ENVIROIUOrM EtSHElil8(eortiaued)
Bvalwtion Por
e Oeecribe the purpoee* type. aad appro:lmste quantitlea ot ~r tilliag or grsding propoaed ~~r u~ ~r
Indic e 4ouree of fill
~ ~ A&ae4
f. Could eroeion occur ae a rasult ot clessiag, conetenctton, er uaet If eo. gaaerally descrise
~
~
t
8. Aeant vlut pesceot of eha site vill be covere vith lmparvi eur acee efter proieet conetruc-
tioa (for euampie, asplult os bnildiags)t h.
h Proposed measuses to redaee or control eroaion, os othes impacts to the earth. if aay
.
~J
z. sIR
a. Mhat type of emieeione to the air rould neult fram tbe propoeal (i.e.. duat. autamobile, odore
induetsial. wod smoke) duriag conetruction aad vhen the yroject is eompletedf , It aqy. `
gener lly daoorihe and give app te quantites if kaawn.
~
b. Me thsra any oft-aito sanrcu oi amissioas o: odor tAat aq efiect yoas psopoul! It no.
geeeersliy QescriDe.
_ ~ • • , t
,
~ - -
. . ~ ~
♦
e. Propoaed eeawsti to nduce coatsol esisaions or other 3sDacb to d:. il mWs ~
3. YASSR
a Burfaces
(1) Ia there any oustaca wter body on or !a tbe is.ediste vicioity oi the @ite tacludiog yeer- ~
rouad and seasonsi strema, aaltwte:. latee. pondo. Yetlando)f If yas, dascribe type aud
provide oaoaa. If apDroptiate. •tate rhat •tream or river it ilova lato.
(Z) Mill the project reauire aay vock over, ia, or adjacent to (vithia 200 feet) the deecsibed
w tecef If yes. pleaee deecribe ond ettach svollable p~n~
,
.
00
~
v ~
(f1AC )97-11li6o) 8eetioa 11.10.tb0(1)
S. SlAXIlB (eoatiowd)
Straluatloa Pot
~ AQsoey Ose Ooly
(3) EiWata the asount ot iill aod d:edge matesial tRat Mould ee plseed ia er ramoved irm tse
surtaee wter or retlands and indtate the asa ot the •ite tAat ronld Ae diaetOd Iadicate
the soutee ot f~ll mterial.
~
M
(4) Mill the proposal srqnin snrtaee wtet vlthdnwls or diwniomt Cive geaeeal desesip- ~
tioo. pnrpose. aad appro=laate qnantitie• ii kaan. ~
(S) DO!/ [IIe pl'OpOiil 1ie Y1tI110 a lOO"y"i ilOOd QIliAt U sO~ AOtQ~ t10D OO tllO iite plaA. d
(6) Does the Oroposal lnvolve aoy disehasges oi vuto satesiala to surfaee atenf Ii no. y
dasctiee the type ot rarta aod anticipstsA volase ot diac6arge
D. QtOQ9Dt
(1) Yl11 =souod wter be nitbdtwn, os rl11 wter be discbes=ed to Ssouad wta:t Giw gooorai (
damesiptian, puspose, and apysoximta Qwntitie• it knorn.
4w
(2) fteesile wste utestal tArt Kli De Qlme6arW lato the irenm iram uptie taeM or otMr
"altasy v"b tewwnt iuility. Deseeipo the Qamcal •tse ai the qstas, the muber oi
6owas to be qeNA (ii Pplieable) e tim eeua s ot porsono he qeta(s ire lWeted to sesae.
~
~
(3) Describq aay systow, otlor tbao tAose deoigaed for the Aiopowi oi "aitery vaste, ~
l"talled tot the pnrpose ot discharging ilnfds belo+r the eround wrtaee (locludas srtan we!►
as tbou tor the dlsoawl of atom wt,es or draioaQe frm tloos draiw). Deseriba the typa oi
srsta, the amouat oi Mtoslal to be AlApostd oi t6tvugb the srstem and the qr"• oi rterL2s
iikaly to bs disposed ot (toelndins wqrlals rbiab my eoter the systs losawrteatly throush
•pillo or u• result o tire tigbttns activities).
-Z7 ♦
(4) Mill auy cAemieals (espeeially otgaoic solvents or petsolem fuels) se stored in aDove
gcoued or uoderground •tosage taduf It no. vhst types aod qwotitia• of aatesials wl11 ee
•toredt
I
~
. ~
8rQ1ulA! ENNIROMMMA1. oROMWCe ~
(WAC 197-11-960) SeC«OA 11 10 230(1)
~
B. RNYnOXKWLL ELEMEtT6 (contlrn,ed) '
Bvaluetioo Por
llgency UBe Only
(S) Yhat proeectite sessures vill ee taken to insure t6st leab or epills of eny chemicel•
•tored or wed on •!te vill not pe ailotied to pereolate to grouad water (tbio lecludea meaoureo
co keep chemicaL out of disposal syatana deoeribed ia 3b(2) aad 3b(3)t
*--R
c itater 8uaoff (iaeluding storm wces):
(1) Describe tha aovrce of ruaofi (laclnding •to=m vatez) aad metbod of collectioa and dispoeal
if anq (iaclude qwntitiee. if known). iihere vill thi4 water flovT tiill thie water flov into
otAes raters! It eo. deacribe.
&-a
(2) Nill aqy ehemical• be rtorad. lundled or uaed oo the •ite in a locstion whee+e a apill or .
lenk vl11 drain to .urface os grouod water or to a•ton water dioposal oystem diaeharging to
surfaca or grouod watec}
~
(3) Could vaste matesisis eote: ground or asface vatere! If so. geaeraliy deecsibe. ,
O&P
d. Propwed uuurea to seduce os control anrface. grouo0. and runoff water ispacca, ii aoy (if
taa ysoposed aecioa liea vitbia the ll~niter 8eniitive 1tea Da sspncLlly claar on ezplaaationa
relaetog eo taculttas eoaeasnsrs seccioas MA), 3bt'Jj. am 9c(2) ot eete aeselclt.c)
6. B1.A6IT8
a. Cheek or eircle tppe ot vaptatioa tonad on the siter
doaidaau t:+see aldes, mpL, airpeo, "s
rgreen R i tis. cedes, aother.
S
igraso.
paotuse.
crop or gsda.
Mst soi2 ploets, cattd 1, bnttercup, bullrwh. skunk ceDbage. othes
w ter plaatss water lilly. eelgrus. silioil, otber.
othe= types of vegetation R'a agCI'.2 ~v1 t~/♦ PJ •
A Hhet kiad utd smount of vegetatioo vill be semoved or altaredt
SO 17f c. 4Ar 'E& W-LerS .
ev e rcw~~ ~ IV,~ .
e Liec thseataned or eadaagered •peciea kaaw to be on or oesr the site. ~
d Propored landscapiaa, we ot m tive plaats, or otber measuree to peeoerve or eaAanee vegetation
on the eitt. !f anys
~.f /~y
•
~ S %
~ 8POIAME ENV~~ ~~~UCE
(M/lC 197-11-960) iSaction 21 10 230(1)
~
B. BliVT801QEl1ty.8LAKENT8 (contimAed)
Bvaluation Por
Ageney, Uae Oaly
S AtiIMALS
e Circle aoy biede und,eaimals vbich heve beea obeerved oa oc asor theo.lte or ate knovn to De on i
os «ear the •itas '
rpird havk, lferon. eagle. songbirde. othera _
mammelstt deer, eear; elk. 6eaver, other:
fiebs 6eae, ealmon, trout, 6arriog. eRelltiehs others
othar _
b Liat auy tAteatened or endangerad oyecies linan to be on or near tha oite.
j ~ -
. ~
c Ie the eite part of e migration routel It~so.~asplaio.,
d. Fropoeedrmdasureo to presarve,ar~endsoce,vildlile. if anys '
.
16 EMMGY AND NATIIRAL gSSOIJRCBS
e Mhat kiods,of aaergy (electric, uatnral ges. vood etove. soler) aill ea used to meet the
[be~completed psoject'e;'eaacgy oeadst Deserlbe whetteer it rill se uaed fos Qeatiag, msaufac-
tusing, ete.
•
`b Would your projact etiact tAe potoottal we oi eolac enera by sdJscent psopastieoY if so.
geaasall`y deacribe. ~
, c M6ac tinde of enesgy eoassevatfoa teeturee ere lacluded in the alans of thio psoposalf I.iat y ~
~ otbar-psoposed maenrae to sedues or coatrol enaFg~r ` e.,if aqy:
, z. _
~
~
~
~ dn-Ga- &&zAice A/
~
7, gNviaoxMw. Mu.TS ;
,e. Ars thsce any an°iromental beeitb beserde, includiag asposure to tftic chemicals, siek~ot fire ~
end exploeion.,spill. o: heseedous vaete, tbat could oecur ae etseeult oi thie pioposali It eo.
deecribe
(1) Deecrlbeiepeeial emergeney eervicee that might be reauired
~ ` r
e. ssv~ao~, o.s~s c~«,~sou.e~
• ~ lvoluecioe ro:
YIR0~1lAL HBALZii , ~ , • - Ageaey fbo tOnir
~I
a
~
(2) Peopoeedrunsusio to reduei os coatcol apvlrommeotal NesitA Auasds."it onyi
b Noieet
(1) Mhat ~typee ot aoiee e:lst ia the mrea tihich mey afteet yaur projact (foe examples trailic.
eauipmeot, opasation, otRetf
&Z" G~
(2) Mhet types nnd leveL_oi aoise rouldi ee eseated+by or aeoocieted vi[h [Aa,projact oa e
edort ;teem or-e loog-teeo bseie (tos oiemplat trattic, coaeteuction, oporetion, otherT Iodieete
94t tipurs po e roild eame tiam the site. .
.
r ~
~ ~ ~ •
~
f I
(3) Ptopoead ewnre to reduce os control noioa lapsete.,ii aepr:
,
8. L4jJD AWBRORBi:IKB 088
u. Ubat, is, the wsraat nee ot the oite aad adjaeant propestleef &M;/A y
• , • 'f
b. Bes t6a,eiteAbaen wod ios opipdtnnt Ii eo, daaertbe. -
J~r~ n
C. Oascribe"any otruetoses oa the site.
,
d. Yill onr iteaetos+es be dasolisbadt It eo• whic6f ~
.
e., flbat is the eurrent soniiog claeeitieation ot the eitet
- - -
E. MAat !e^t6e eursant campraAeoeive plan daoigoation) ot~tha elte,t
S. It eapiica6ls, ihat is'tds ensraat e6oralies sastar p:ogtm deslgmtionroi eDe eiteY
A. Nas aay peet ot the eita baen clmaitiad as nu 'sAviroasantaily eeneitive" ores? It eo.~y~ ~
eyeeii7 -
Aoprosimetely hor oaeT peopl'e vould caeide'or Mo in the eo~le ed projactf
e,~.
t
~
_ . _ _ r .4.. ~ , ~ - „ . , , .
I
. ~
. I
spogm mm=aommma. ornwce
(YAC 197-11-960) 8ectioo 11.10.530(i) ,
ElIVn0mmum miNsm (eoatiauad) ~
~ 6valuation Por
AQency Uae Only
llppsoximstely har aay people waold the eampleted projeet dlsplau ~
k. Propwed seaouses to avoiA or reduce displaceoeat Iopecta. if any:
~
1. Bropwed wasures to aoanra the psopoeal i• cmpatible vitb exiating and projected laad uaes aad
plan~, it anyc
i ~
rPr»a«h
i5i-sh-e!
9. eousUc
a. Appsosimataly hov uny unito wuld ba providad, if anyt Indicate rhether bigd. aiddle. or
lar-lacose houaiag.
/Y
b. ApprQSioataly hov many units. if aqy, would Oe ellsiostedt Indicate vhetber high. aiddle,os
lov-ineme honsiog.
C. Propoaed amsureo te teduce or eoatrol housing lmpacts. if any: '
10. 11P.SigB?IC8
a MMt i• the tallest tieiot ot aW propoted •teucture (s), not lociudiug antaeou= rlut is the
yriacipol azterios buildinQ matas (s) PsoyosedT
• •
~
e•
e. Nhat viers in the lsedtate vicinity wuld be alte os oDotsnctedt I
~
i
►
C. Fsopoeed maare• to sedwa os coatsol psthetic impscta, ii anyi
11. LIGHT AND CLARB
a Mlut type ot light or glare vill the psoPo"l produe Y6at tia ot day vould it uialy occurT
~
b Could light or glase from the tiatehed projeet ee a oaEety h d os iotesiere vitb vievst
~:.i
C. fibet exiating offroite •ourcee of 1 ht r glace sey affect your proposel4
~
d. Proposed Qeaoura• to raduce or eontrol light aad glare iapacta. if ~nyi
~
~ . '
. `
(Y4C 197-11-960) Bectloa 11.10.230( '1) /I'ORAMR U4VOIQUNlAL-MINNM
s. avnaMUXM a~zs (eooetm~a) ~
Bvalwtion por
Agancr u.e ooiy
12. ABCiISATI0t1
a. Yhat desiguted and lotoinal recnattowl oppostunlties ace ia the ioaedistely Meinltyt
e. Ilauld the proposed projeet dioplaee any atiating recnational west ii to, dascri0e.~_
C. Fe+opwed ueaaure• to reduce or eoatrol lspact• cn reee+eation, ineluding reenatioa opportunities
to be provlded by the projsct o: appliaanc, it auyt
13 BIBTOItIC IINID AILlOAAL PBBSBItVATION
a. Ara tben any places or oejacts liated oo, os proposed tos natioael. •ute, or local pse"rva-
tion ergiaten kootia w be oa os m:t to the •iut Sf so, geoerallq deecriee.
. ~ ~ .
e. @aaerally deaeribe any laadoefte or evidance oi historic archeeological, scieotitic or cultural ~
importance knorn to 6e on or oazt to eM aita. V9
c. Proaoaad wawses to rednee or eontrol lmpaeu. it aeq: ~
•
16 'AtANBPOQlAlION N ` •
0. Identity pnslie steeeta aod hl~ qttiaj the •lte, aol dascsibe proposed aetess to tlia
tsisticg @treet systa. 8hon an @its PL ~ ii any.
a-
~
~
b. I41ts epsnotly aexvsd by pnblle tsaasitt It ao ~+fiat the spproaclmte distanes to the ol
o"Jwt tranit stopf
ti . ` ~ . • ~ ~
c Z4 'Wrmt+i sW~~ MMJA *a bd proji;t MNt iHov saap va,ld `tllt Oroieet e
% ileloecet r_, (Y`
~ .r- ~
~
r ry K ~
MAr ~ 1 kQ ~/(r
•
~ ~L~ a
A. Mill the Propowl sequin any mm raad• os •treeta, os lepsovamate to euiotiog roeds or streete
aot includiag ddvevayst Ii so. gaaerally dascrlbe (ladicata rhether public or private).
4e--
Mill the prejeet we (er oeeur io the immediete vlcioity oi) wster. rail, or eir treaaportetiont
If oo, generelly deocribe. 4Twl
. 9
. ~
. ,
SIIOKAlfS MVIROMOMM ORDINJQCB
(MAC 197-11-960) eaetioo 11.10.270(1)
S. Sl1YM0lKOM ELBlEl1T8 (contiawd)
6oeluatloa for
Ageacy Use Only
f Hov maay veAteulac trips per day vould be genereted Dy the eaapleted projectt If knorn.
tadieate vhen peak vovld ocws.
•
• ,
,
g Proposed oaaenree to rednee os eontsol traaepo:tation iapaetes !t aoye ~ S
,
Aaet~ 4!xbn
. ~
.
15. PUBLIC SERVICBS ~v
a. Yould the projaet resnlt !a an iac:+eased oeed for pablic 4ervicee (for esanple: Fire protectioo.
police protectioa. Aealtb cace, achoolo, otlus)t If so. generally deecsibe
One ~
e. Proposed measue+ee to reduee or toatrol direct iapaets on puDlic sarvieas. ii aeAys
16. U?ILItIBB
0. Ciscle util! rreatlf evai2sela ~ il" lectrielty tural gs< rsterratuse
sarviee.<c6
OOV saaitasy ~eraptie ~y~tem .
p. Desecise the utilities tbst are psoposed fos the proseet. the nttllty providiag the eesvica and
the gensral eonateuctioa activities on the aite or in the imaediate vicioity afiieb aight be
d.
•
~
C. SIGNAtMB
i, the nndersigosd. srear nmder the panalty ot oesjnry that the above respoasas are oade trnthtully aaa to the best ot sy knwledge. i alao
nneentaad tlut, ohould there 6e aery villtul derepresentation os villful laek of fnli disclosure on my part, the aeeocy my vltlWsav any
deteemimtioa ot oonslgaiEicaaee thst !e eight iesve ia relianee upon thio ehecklist.
e ' ff
Dace: Fropoaaac ~ -AV .3 r7 Pleue Pciat or 'i~►pe 0
~ I~iS.T/D I')
Bsopoaa~c Aaere„i ~ •
Pbous _ SO Ji • 1 ~ Z1_6
Pesson eomPletiog Eoems vilm iliz 10A • Oatet
Phones 9~6-ssa Z
roa areFF usg aNn.t
Steff llembes(e) Revieviog Cheekliet:
J "
Baeed th etafE raviev of the emrironmeotal checkliet aad ot er pestineat laformetion, the etaff
A Coneludea tbet tbere ete no probaWe eignificunt edverae iIDpecte end tecameade a determiastioo ot aoneignificaace.
B Concludee tAet ptobebla •igoificaat advorse ooviconmncel impeete do exiat tor the curreat propowl aad reeommeade a a!tlgated deter-
mination ot aoasigaiflcaace vith coadltioae.
C CoaeluQe• tAat there ore probable •ignifluat adsersa aavitoemental lmpacto eod tecooeads a dltaisiaatioo of oftnificance.
iILING iBR - $75 00
- /Q
RECEIVED
'AUG 111987
SPOK/WE ENYIROPDrIENTAL ORDINANCE SPOKANE C""ry W31NEFR
wAC 197-II-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Determinatlon of Nonsignificance (ONS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFlCANCE
DESCRIPTION 0F PROPOSAL: lldd a 24 foat by 39 foot addition to an exTsting boardTng house and convert the
eoctsting garage to Itving space to create a BOARDING HOME faciltty (to be Ilcensed by Mashington State
Oepartment of Soclal 3 Health Servtces) for up to 12 elderly persons and one non-restdent caretaker employee.
The residents MIII be mostly afflicted rith Aizheimer's Disease or similar mentally debilitory diseases.
FILE NO.: CUE-41-86 and VE-79-87.
PROPONEKT: Geraldine Sarff (509) 926-5502.
LOGITION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY: Central Spokane Valley area at E. 14819 Mission 1lvenue.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse Tmpact on
the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Is not requlred under RCM1 43.21C.030 (2)(c). Thts
decislon was mede after revlew of a carpleted envtronmental checklist end ofiher informatton on ftle with the
lesd agency. This Information is available to the public on request.
t) There is no comnent perlod for this DNS; pursuant to MAC 197-II-340 (I).
00() This ONS Is issued under MU4C 197-II-340 (2); the lead agency Mill not ect on this proposal fcr at
least 15 days from the date Issued (below). Comments regardfng thls DNS must be submltted no later
than 4:00 p.m., September 4, 1987 if they are intended to alter the DNS.
Responsible Official: WALLIS D. HUBBARD by Thomas G. Mosher, AICP
Positlon/Title: Spokane County Zoning Adf ustor Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: N. 721 Jefferson St., Spokane, MIA., 99260
Coaments regerding envtronmental concerns are welcome at the h .
Date Issued: ~nature:
•if+►*~w~wst~*~f*~r•~~•*~~*~~►~tt~r•*~r•~•~r~ •stfs~~r•af~r•~r
IIPPE/1L of th I s determi nat i on, after 1 t beoomes f i na I, may be made to Thanas G. her, l11 CP, at the Spokane
Oounty Plenning Deparfinent, N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, MU1, 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as
fhe above proposai appeal deadline, being 10 calendar days after the signing of the Decision. Thts appeal nwst
be Kritten and make specific fectual obJections. Contact the P18nning pepartment for asslstanoe rith the
specifics of a SEPA appeal.
; s f ~ s s ~r ~r ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~r w ~r f • ~r • a f ~r f ~r ~ f ~r # ~r ~r r ~ ~r ~r f f t ~r ~ ~ • f ~ • ~ a * • ~r ~ ~r t
A copy of the ONS ras malled to:
I. E. WA Stete Health Systems Agency 2. Fire Dist. fi
Mest 1728 Jadcson E. 10319 Sprague
Spokane, WA 99201 Spokane, WA 99206
3. M/1 State Dept. of Transportation 4. Vera Irrigatlon District 015
N. 2714 Mayfair P. 0. 8ox No. 6
Spokane, WA 99207 Yeradale. WA 99037
5. MA State Dept. of Ecology 6. Spokane Regional Counctl '
Environmental Review Sectlon 4th Floor Clty Hall
Mail Stop PY-II W. 808 Spokane Falls Bivd.
Olympta, WA 98504 Spokane, WA 99201-3333
7. Spdcane County Butlding b Safety S. Spokane County Utility Department
Department Attn: Bill Dobratz
9. Spokane County Health District 10. Spokane County Englneer's Office
Attn: Dennis iCroll Attn: SEPA REVIEw
II. Spokane Transit System 12. MU State Dept. of Soclal b Health Services
W. 1230 Boone Regtonal Office
Spokane, WA 99201 W. 924 Sinto/L-32/4
Spokane, WA 99201
13. Spokane County Health Dlst. Attn: Fred Roundtree
Attn: John Anicettl
8-87/0026z
~ A.
!
t
SPOKJ%1r COUNTY ZONIyG ADJUSTOR - PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA: September 9, 1987
TIME: As set forth below; hearing opens at 9:00 a.m.
PLACE: Spokane County Planning Dept., N. 721 Jefferson St., 2nd floor hearing room.
~
4) CUN-27-87 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR Dir-PENDENT RELATIVE
(This item will be heard at 10.15 Generally located southwest of Deer Park, south
' a.m, or as soon thereafter as of Spotted Road and north of and adjacent to
possible). Parker Road in the SW 1/4 of Section 9,
Townshi p 28, Range 42.
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a conditional use aermit to allow the temporary location
of a manufactured home associated with a need to house 14erton Friot, a dependent relative,
on the subject prope rty. Section 4.13.120 (m) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance allows
such a use upon issuance of a conditional use permit.
cXISTING ZONING. Unclassified
SITE SIZE: Approxlmately 4 acres
APPLICANT. Burns J. Fr1ot
~ S. 824 yenry Road
Greenacres, WA 99010
5) rUE-41-85 CONDITIONAL USc PcRMIT FOR 3OARDING H0ME QND
! (Thisitem wi11 be heard at 10.30 VARIANCIES FROM LOT SI ZE & LOT '.JI DTH
a.m. or as soon the reafte r as Generally located in the Eighth Addition of
possi5le). Ve radale Heights, no rth of and aJjacent to
Mi ss i on Avenue between Progress Road and Adams
' Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 25,
, Range 44.
~
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a conditional use permit to allow an existing Adult Family
~ Home to become a Soarding Home. Section 4.24.040 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
` allows such a use in the Agricultural/Suburuan zone upon issuance of a conditional use
permit. The applicant also requests two (2) variances. (1) to allow a Boarding Home to be
13cated on a parcel of land having approximately .43 acres, whereas Section 4.24.040 (b) (i)
of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires 3 acres; and (2) to allow the property's
width at the building line to 5e 103 feet wide, whereas Section 4.24.040 (b) (Z) of the
; Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires that minimum width be at least 125 feet wide.
( EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural/Suburban
~ SITE SIZE Approximately 0.43 acres
APPLICANT. Geraldine Sarff
E. 14819 'Mission
Spokane, WA 99216
-~o9 0 `6
.
. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT,
11145, -77y"-,t /
Ce rti fi cate of Exerrpti on Appl cati ori (7//P -4~/ - g6
,
Narte of AQpI i cant ; ~ - -
t
Street Address :
Home :
Ci t: State: Zi p Code .i Phone :Work :
N ame o P ro pe rty Owne r( s): REQUE ON ( S)( Ci rcl e p.x~op ri ate-,Ac n):
ari nditional Use Permit Non-Conforming Lot/Use
Wai yer o f Vi ol atiori Temporary Use/Structure Other:
*
*
* FOR STAFF USE ONLY
*
*Ci te 0 rdi n an ce Secti on :v.~,,ed,,-c, 01 d Co de : New Co de : t
, y .1-5
*Section Township 'z'~ Range ZZ!!~( Property Size: •
*
*Existing Zoning: 1~_G F.L.U.P. Designation: t
*PSSA: CY N U TA: JC.,,,N ASA: _ON F I RE DI ST. LEGAL CHEC KED BY :t
* ~ *
*Hearing Date: /;W~~ 7 Staff takirig iri Appl i cation: * ~ ~ * ~ * ~ * * * * * * * * * ~ * * ~t * * * * * * *
1.
Existing Use of Property:
~
oe-
Describe Iiitended Proposal:
67d,d
~
.
Street Address of Property:•
Legal Des cri pti on of P roperty ( Incl ude easement i f appl i cabl e) :
,
Parcel 41 54oo/ -C) 7D ~ Source of Legal.:~/~~~ C'o
Total amount of adjoiriing land controlled by this owr►er/sponsor:.
Wh at 1 n te rest do you hol d i n the p rope
~
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property;
I SWEAR, UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORI-
ZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PEDIISSION FROM SAID
OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHEO; AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE
RESPONSES ARP THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF
MxI xca~Eo&F,~
r •
, ~ •,..ss~f,~ S 's
♦ t` 5i gTi
Address :
~ UTaRY Phone No.':~7-~~~~~_ Z Date:
n ~ ~ ~~T .
~ •
• "~r► ~ ~ 1
: Awu~g~: Notary.
.
ok_""
.
% ,1~ ~ ~a9 ; Date :
~0 ~ f
.
I'_ Ii, (oVP.r)
•
. N _
~
A. BURDEN OF PROOF
It is necessary for the appl i cant or his/her representati ve to establ ish the
reasons why the requested proposal shoul d be approved and to 1 itera] ly put forth
the basic case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc. )designed to help you present your case
in a way whi ch addresses the cri teri a whi ch the Zoning Acjustor must cons i der.
P1 ease fi11 the fo rm out an d retu rn i t wi th you r appl i cati on . I f you di dn' t get a
form, ask the P1 anning Department personnel for advi ce on how to proceed.
~ S IGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS
.
1 COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
A prel iminary consul tation has been hel d to discuss the proposal. The appl i-
ant has e info of requi reT s a d s ards.
~
Si gnature ISi gn-of Waivedj
COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT
A prel iminary consul tation has been hel d to discuss the proposal. The appl i-
cant has been informed of requi rements and standards.
fS~ignature Date ? (Si gn-off Wai ved)
3. COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Waive if outside WMAB)
.
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
appl icant h b i informed of requi rements arid standards.
S nature) ~Date ( Si gn-off Wai vea)
] The appl i cant i s requi red to di s cuss the p roposal wi th
to become informed of requi rements and
standards.
(Distri ct Si gnature) (Date) (Si gn-off Wai ved)
WATER PURVEYOR (Waive if outside CWSSA) NAME:
~
~
,S Oo T
a) The proposal located within the boundary of our future service area.
b) The proposal is/tsemat located within the boundary of our current district.
c) We are/a*eamt ab]e to serve this site with adequate water.
d) Satisfactory, ar gements haae/have not been made to serve this proposal.
8 7
i gnature) ~ate) (Si gn-off Wai ved)
~
f
1
a •
APPLICANT'S FORM
NaME:
.
FILE:
1. VARIANCES
A. Will the variance authorize a use otherwise prohibited in this zone?
Yes ; No Comment: ,
B. Wi 11 speci al ci rcumstances a 1 icablrtto the ro ert I t such as si ze,
shape, topography, surroun ngs when comg#ne t the standards of
the Zoning Ordinance, create practical difficulties for use of the
property and/or depri ve the property of ri ghts and pri vi ] eges common
to other properti es i n the vici ni ty and slmi 1 i ar zone cl assi ficatl on?
Yes ; No - ; Conment:
C. Wi l l the granti ng of the vari ance be materi al ly detrimental to the
publ i c we1 fare or i njuri ous to property or improvements i n the
vicinity and zone? Yes ; No Comnents:.#
0. Does strict application of the zoning standard create an unreasonable
burden in light of purpose to be served by the standard? Yes X ;
No ; Cortment:
E. Would relaxation of the zoning standard make a more environmentally
sensitive or energy-conserving project or encourage continued or new
use of an historic property? Yes ; No4 ; Comment:
F. Will a broader, public need or interest be served by granting verse
denying the variance? Yes~ ; No ; Comment:
Is the case for a variance supported by other like or simalar
, si tuati ons i n the vi ci ni ty and i n simi 1 ar zones? Yes ; No
~ Comnent: ~
I
(continued on reverse side)
~
I
1 ~
H. Will granting the variance adversely affect the overall zoning design,
pl an or concepfor ei ther the imnedi ate area or the enti re County?
Yes ; No Comment:
I. Is the case for a variance substantially based upon a lack of
reasonable economic return or a claim that the existing structure is
too small? yes ; No Cortment:
J. Wi 11 granti ng the vari ance be i nconsi stent wi th the general purpose
and intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes ; No _,X ; Comment:
K. Did the practical difficulty which gives rise to the variance request
exi st before the property was acqui red by the present owner3 Yes
No ; Comment:
L. Wi11 the granting of the variance result in defacto zone reclasslfica-
ti on; that i s, the establ i shi ng of nearly al l the pri vi 1 eges comnon to
a different zone classification? Yes ; No _le)S; Comment:
P~? Does the requested vari ance resul t i n the ci rcumventi on of densi ty
regulations designed to protect the Aquifer? Yes ; Ho
Conment:
0046z/Arch. 0002z 2
.
' APPLICANT' S FORM
.
. ~
• _
' N
FILE
V. CONDITIONAL USES State Law, Section 36. 70.020 (7). cl ari fies that the
county ordi nances must speci fy the standards and cri teri a
- that shall be applied in the review by the Zoning Adj usto r
Assumin9 the ProPosal is listed as a"Permitted" oonditional use• do you
bel i eve the propos al meets al l of the requi red establ ished and appl i cabl e
c ri te ri a?
0/ e/ Z y a yo
~ ~~~~2) )
B. What have you done or coul d you dv to:
J 1) make the use compati bl e wi th othe r permi tted acti vi ties i n the s ame
vicinity and zone?
i A-d & 002 A-11W% A-S-t 4 /..2 zto
S~
.
AND
2 assure against imposing excessive demarids upon public utilities?
~a .
41- X_"
,
Expl ain how or why the proposal wi 11 not be detri mental to:
1) the Comprehensi ve P1 an 6yl~~
~ 14ND
' p ~ r
2 surrounding propertyT5 `k'h aT
#2,*~ce, fi-O P zL. 4:11 ~ -wir _I r P" Q_ jne _ w k. r G m 5:rLt
~
D~ What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spi rit
and intent (health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Ordinance AHD
mitigate any adverse effect upon the neighboring properties-- including but
not 1lmited to: (1) time limits; (2) front, side or rear yard greater than
minimum stated; (3) suitable 1 andscaping; (4) si gning,; (5) off-street parking;
and (6) others? -
ov.P S _ w
1
y" T ' /r~LO / "Gd~/~/6~~ Q✓! i r ~~1.~
I
f
I
~
' • , . "b..
_ • I
' SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AP,P~ICqIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FILE CONTACT: 0 h• SQLV NEARING DATE:
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Additional information may be required by the Planning Department
after the application is submitted.
~ Additional Fee Requirements In order to assist you with your financial planning regarding this application, PLEASE
6E ADYISED THAT OTHER DEPARTMENTS ANO AGENCIES WITN WHICH YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONSULT
MAY CHARGE YOU AN AODITIONAL FEE. The fees charged by the Planning Department only
partially defer our administrative costs and are not shared with other departments or
agencies.
~ Preliminary Submittal
Prior to filing an application, the project sponsor shall become familiar with the
current procedures and forms. Planning Department staff inembers are available for
advice on current procedures, past actions which may affect the proposal and the
Zoning Ordinance requirements.
~ Scheduling an Application for Public Hearin %
Complete applications received by the Planning Department will be scheduled for public
'hearing on the earliest possible date. Staff will contact the applicant approximately
21 days prior to the public hearing, and provide the information needed to fulfill the
notification requirements outlined in "E." below.
,
D Submittal Requirements
The Planning Department staff requires that the following information be submitted at
a minimum. NOTE: WE HAVE A FREE NOTARY SERYICE AT OUR OFFICE.
6P Completed application form (green)
"E-i Completed certificate of exemption form (yellow) (if required)
~ Completed environmental checklist (if ►•equired)
~ Assessor's section map for subject parcel and property within 300 feet (Obtained
' at the County Assess9r'!LMfice). If required by the Planning Department, obtain
one . The maps are to be submitted with the application form and other
required information to the Planning Departmen . ~ 9utline the subject parcel.
Adjoinin9 Assessor's maPs that are needed• E~ l`7 -Z!5~fy
,
pl~. Statement of Attending Ph_ysician for Dependent Relative (if applicable)
~k Affidavit of Dependent Relative Circumstances (if applicable) "
C-d Fees - Fees are itemized as follows:
Dependent Relative Conditional Use Permit $ 50.00
Condi ti onal Use Permi t 275 0 ~
Variance .00 CA
Waiver of Violation ' s)
Environmental Checklist
~oward 5.00 fee wi be har e~ at fy~pplication conference and a lied
the finai fee when~the application is submitted. pp
6110 Sjte Plan - Submit four
opies of the proposal drawn to scale and indicating
Zeoscale ~Towing informat
of drawing 09 parking areas/spaces/
b, north arrow driveways
c vicinity map landscapin g
d> site area showing property boundaries fencing
and dimensions , topography of the site
e. width and names of s treets ad j acent c~- ' the
to the site e proper'ty ~
f existing buildings eptic tank, drainfield (1
proposed bui 1 di ngs ( i ncl udi ng and wel l
exterior decks/balconies) showing o. dime~sions from proposed
dimensions and distance to property structures to the ordinary
boundaries ~ high water mark of all water
~ hei ht of all structure ,bodi s within 200 f
~ 9 ~ ! I e eet
/
~ !7 ~-~o hn ~►o uS e c'!r4 ~ • i'~ ~ Glr~
4 , ~ , ~
1 ~ ~qd~~ t-}-iOVI h~o ~.tiL o.~,
.
t
sI•
. ` v • ' ;
e
E. Notification Requirements '
The applicant is to provide notification as follows: '
Step 1: All properties within three hundred (300) feet of the proposal shall
be notified by the proponent. UtiliZing the addresses obtained from the Planning
Department or a Title Company and copies of the Agenda Notification prepared by
the Planning Department, the applicant sha11 mail the Agenda Nqtification by
first class no later than 12 days prior to the public hearing.
Ste 2: The applicant shall provide the Property Owners List, Affidavit of
a ng and all returned mails to the Planning Department two 42) days prior
to the public hearing for inclusion in the file.
F. Publ i c Heari nq
The applicant or a representative must be present at the public hearing. If
the owner ts not at the meeting, the "representative" must havQ written authori-
zation from all owner(s) to act on their behalf.
r
t ~
. ^
f
\
r
~ -
I
- ~
t
1
`