CUE-13-94 ~
~
4 ~
ZONING AllJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
USE PERMIT FOR A DAY CARE ) CONCLUSIONS,
CENTER ) AND DECISIUN
APPLICANT: MELISSA CRAPO,
for Little Learner Child Development Center r;ui; 0 91994
FILE: CUE-13-94
COMPANION FILE(S): VE-13-94(A-C) and ZE-110-80 County Eagineering
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to continue to operate an
existing day care center. The Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zone, § 14.622.240.4 of the
Zoning Code of Spokane County, allows such a use upon issuance of a Conditional Use
Pernut. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to section 14.404.100 of the
Zoning Code of Spokane County and Spokane County Board of County Commissioners
resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended.
PROJECT LOCATION: In the east central Spokane Valley, north of and adjacent to
Mission Avenue, approximately 250 feet west of Sullivan Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 14,
Township 25N, Range 44EVVM; 15321 E. Mission Avenue. Parcel No.: 45141.0204
OPPONENTS nF RECORD: NnNE
PUBLIC IIEARING AND DECISIUN: After consideration of all available inforniation
on file, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the publ' earing held
on June 22, 1994, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on August , 1994 to
APPROVE the application.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Testimony was taken under oath.
2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file.
3. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the
proposal as Urban. The proposal is generally consistent with the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan and complies with RCW 36.70.450. The Arterial Road Plan identifies
Mission Avenue as a Minor Arterial, which requires a right-of-way width of 80 feet; whereas,
the existing width is 60 feet. A future right-of-way acquisition area of 10 feet 0 inches shall be
identified.
4. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include single family and duplex
residential, I-90 right-of-way, office and business. This'residential' appearing building is a
reasonable transition from business/office on the east to residential on the west.
5. The following is true with regard to the proposal:
a. The proposal needs several variances from the standards of the Cond.irional
Use Pemiit and the underlying zone.
~
~
CASE NO. CUE-13-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 2
b. The property has been used as a day care for several years, with no intent to
violate the Zoning Code. A change of occupancy permit, which would have
triggered a zoning review, was never sought, allegedly based upon incorrect
informarion from the selling realtor.
6. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, the environmental checklist and
other data have been reviewetl and the project has been found to not have any probable
significant advetse impacts to the physical environment. A Determination of Nonsignificance
(DNS) was issued on May 24, 1994 and sent to five (5) agencies. The agencies reviewing the
checklist neither indicated that a more detailed environmental review should be provided nor
commented that the DNS should be reconsidered. Comments regarding the environmental
matters [were] [were not] made at the public hearing. There was not sufficient evidence
presented pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) to withdraw the DNS.
7. The proposal is listed in the Zoning Code of Spokane County as a conditional use
allowed in the UR-22 z,one; but the proposal does not meet all the established and applicable
criteria described for that conditional use and the underlying zone; specifically, frontage,
fencing and landscaping. These issues are considered in VE-13-94(A-C).
8. No adverse tesrimony or written comments were received regarding the proposal.
9. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various County
agencies reviewing this project and has indicated those recommendations are acceptable.
10. The proper legal requirements for advertising the hearing before the Zoning
Adjustor of Spokane County have been met.
11. The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as necessary and
appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public interest and general welfare.
12. Various perforniance stand.ards and criteria are additionally needed to make the use
compatible with other pemutted activities in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against
imposing excessive demands upon public utilities, and these shall be addressed as conditions
of approval.
13. T}Ze proposal w,ill nut be detr-irilental to surrounding properties.
14. The proposal does not irlipose excessive demands on piIblic utilities.
15. The proposal, as conditioned, is compatible with uses pemlitted outri`7ht in the
z.0r1C.
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the ZplllIlt,? Adjustor
APPROVES the proposal, subject to compliance with the followinLy
i
~ CASE NO. CUE-13-94 SPOR:ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. GENERAL
1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in
interest and shall run with the land.
2. Failure to comply with any of the condidons of approval contained in this decision,
except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zoning
Code for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropriate.
3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or
the conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zoning Adjustor to be within the context of
the original decision.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. This parcel shall not be further subdivided unless consistent with RCW 58.17,
the various county subdivision regulations and the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan for
the area.
2. The proposal shall comply with all applicable standards of secrion 14.622.240.4 of
the Zoning Code of Spokane County unless deviations, variances or exceptions have been
lawfully granted.
3. If the Planning Department believes there are extenuating circumstances associated
with the pernut, it may cause there to be a public hearing and reconsiderarion of the permit; the
notification expense shall be that of the county if such reconsideration takes place.
4. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenailce
acceptable to the Planning Director/designee shall be submitted for the project prior to release of
occupancy or building pennits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight
distance at access points is not obscured or impaired.
5. A specific development plan shall be subnutted tor Ylanning Department review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits. Construction must be judge.d as proceeding
according to the plan or constitute a zoning violation.
6. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
cond.irions imposed as a result of approval of a land use acrion. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the condirions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Norice
should be recorded within the same time fiame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Plannina Deparnnent. The Title Notice shall generally
provide as follows:
IIU/I;t;L-i3-94 C:a~x!
1
~ CASE NO. CUE-13-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4
~
The parcel of property legally described as is
the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or
Administrative Official on , imposing a variety of special
development conditions. File No. is available for inspection
and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department.
7. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the
County Auditor a Tide Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way
and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall only be released, in full or
in part, by the Planning DepartmenL The nodce should be recorded within the same time frame
as an appeal and shall provide the following:
a. At least 10 feet of reserved future acquisirion area for road right-of-way and
utilities, in addirion to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way
along Mission Avenue.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning
Code shall be measured from the reserved future accusarion area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs
should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way
and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area,
they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway
improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may
be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as
landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be
considered interim uses.
8. Landscaping and parking, consistent with the approved Planning Department file
version, shall be installed and operational prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage
of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as
authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: FIRE
APPARATUS AC'CESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FIAW; APPROVED WATER
SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILTTY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY
CLASSIFICATION; F:XITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECI'ION; AND ENERGY CODE
REGULATIONS.
2. Landscaping and parking, consistent with the approved Planning Department file
version, shall be installed and operational prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit,
i1Wtrf.-t3-9a cmpo
1
~
,
CASE NO. CUE-13-94 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 5
IV. DIVISION OF UTILITIES
None is reported/needed.
V. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
None is reported/needed.
VI. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
None is reported/needed.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH
NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE
RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LA.PSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD.
HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EYPENSES AND
INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS
OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL. ~
A &L
r ,
DATED this day of August, 1994.
j ~ .
THO S G. SHER, AICP
Zoning Ad ustor
Spo ane County, Washington
FILED:
1) Applicant (Certified/Return Receipt Mail)
2) Opponents of Record
3) Spokane Division of Engineering and Roads
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Division of Utilities
6) Spokane County Department of Buildings
7) Spokane County Fire Protecrion District No. 1
8) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electroilic File
NOTE: ONLY TI-IE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN
APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DAT'E OF SIGNINTG.
APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY $210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT
THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING,
1026 W. BROADWAY AVENUE, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Section 14.412.042 of the
Zoning Code for Spokane County).
F iUK'li L:-13-94 Crapo
" OL . . . .
ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A VARIANCE FROM ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
FRONTAGE, FENCING AND LAND- ) CONCLUSIONS,
SCAPING STANDARDS ) AND DECISIOIV
FILE: VE-13-94(A-C)
APPLICANT: MELISSA CRAPO,
for Little Learner Child Development Center, Inc.
COMPANION FILE(S): CUE-13-94
APYLICATION DESCRIPTIUN: The applicant requests: (a) 90 feet of frontage; whereas
§ 14.622.240.4.b of the Zoning Code requires 125 feet; (b) Four (4) foot tall fencing enclosure of
the play area; whereas § 14.622.240.4.c of the Zoning Code requires a six (6) foot fence; and (c)
three (3) and four (4) feet of landscaping at the street frontage; whereas § 14.806.040.2.a of the
Zoning Code requires 20 feet of Type III Landscaping. Authority to consider such a request exists
pursuant to section 14.404.080 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County and Spokane County
Board of County Commissioners resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended.
PROJECT LOCATION: In the east central Spokane Valley, north of and adjacent to Mission
Avenue, approximately 250 feet west of Sullivan Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township
25N, Range 44EWM; 15321 E. Mission Avenue. Parcel Number(s): 45141.0204
OPPONENTS OF RECORD: NONE
PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After considerarion of all available information on
file, one or more site visits, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the
publ}c ~h~eanng held on June 22, 1994, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on August
`7 , 1994 to APPROVE the application as set forth in the file documents and as
conditioned below.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Testimony was taken under oath.
2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file.
3. In compliance with RCW 36.70.450, the Planning Department determined that this
proposal is generally consistent, as conditioned, with the Urban category of the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. The site is zoned Urban Residential-22 (UR-22), which allows the proposed use upon
approval of this application.
5. The exisring land uses in the area of the proposal include single family and duplex
residential, I-90 right-of-way, office and commercial. This residential appearing building is a
reasonable transition from business/office to residential.
. t . , .
CASE NO. VE-13-94(A-C) SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2
6. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State Environmenta.l
Policy Act, Chapter 43.21 C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b).
7. The requirement for 125 feet of frontage is to provide enough frontage for a loop
driveway for the purposes of child drop-off and pick-up. The applicant has demonstrated that,
with variance of some of the side yard landscaping and a reduction of the requirement for front
yard landscaping, a loop driveway can be accomplished at this site within 90 feet of frontage.
8. The Code requirement for 6 foot tall fencing was established for security reasons. The
interest is in keeping the children within the play area and keeping intruders, human or animal,
outside the play area. The property was purchaseri by the applicant with a 4 foot fence around
what is now the play area; except that, the fence on the north, at the I-90 right-of-way is a 6 foot
fence. The Washington State Department of Social and Health Services reports that a'securely
fenced' (as per its requirements) area is defined as being a fence 4 feet in height. The applicant
advises that there are one or more child care employees in the play area at all times when the
children are within the play area. During the past operation at the site, there has apparently not
been an incident of children being at risk because of the 4 foot existing fence. Additionally, the
nature of the adjacent property (residendal to the west, freeway right-of-way to the north (6 foot
fence) and business/offices to the east) does not lend itself to threatening situations for the children
of the day care center. A requirement for 2 feet of additional fencing would appear to serve little or
no useful purpose in light of the added expense and inconvenience in the form of day care
interruption and does not seem justified. A variance to four (4) feet is warranted under tilc
y. 'I lic; rc:.yuired2U iect ui 'I ype iil lancl5capiiig iil tile ii-olit yarci, a5 well a5 ttic; wc;5t sicic
yard, becomes unworkable in the area between the front building face and the street. Under the
former Zoning Ordinance, the 1980 rezone allowed the then existing (and presently now existing)
building to remain while the property was zoned to residential/office. With the crossover to the
Zoning Code and the UR-22 zone on January 1, 1991, the property became nonconfornling with
respect to the landscaping. The use of a day care center is an allowed use in the present zone and
the nonconforming status of the reduced front yard landscaping and reduced side yard landscapiri -a
within the front yard area is a carry over from previous government approvals and prior existing
cond.itions. In order to maintain a loop driveway and achieve reasonable and adequate parking oi1
the parcel of land, the landscaping must be reduced in the front yard area and reduced on a portioil
of the front yard area, where 20 feet of side yard (to the west) landscaping is required. Many
possible uses occupying this property and building would more than likely run into a similar front
yard requirement with respect to landscaping and more than likely seek a variance from this
standard. The minimal amount of landscaping that will be allowed by granring this variance is
consistent with the landscaping for businesses and residences in the area.
10. The fact that the 1980 zone reclassification accommodated the existing building, now,
combined with the more rigorous standards of the Zoning Code, creates the front yard landscaping
problems now at issue.
11. No adverse testimony or written comments were received regarding the proposal.
12. The applicant must submit a revised site plan to the Planning Department for review and
approval prior to the issuance of any building permits or any occupancy pennits. The revised site
plan should provide for adequate parking on the site or an authorized shared parking arrangement
HD/VE-13-94(A-C) Crapo
• i , • •
CASE NO. VE-13-94(A-C) SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3
with an adjacent property and provide for a 3-4 foot minimal strip of landscaping in the front yard
and at least 2 feet of landscaping along the west property line at the front property line and
expanding to the fu1120 foot required width approximately due west of the southwest corner of the
build.ing (except for emergency exit needs).
13. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of vanous County agencies
reviewing this project.
14. Various perfonn.ance standards and criteria are additionally needed to make the use
compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against
imposing excessive demands upon public utilities, and these shall be addressed as condirions of
approval.
15. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor
of Spokane County have been met.
DECISION
From the foregaing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the
proposal as generally set forth in the file documents, subject to compliance with the following
CnNDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. GENERAL
1. The following cond.itions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in interest
and shall run with the land.
2. Failure to comply with any of the cond.itions of approval contained in this decision,
except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the 7,oning Code
for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropriate.
3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or tile
conditions of approval as may be judged by the 7,cming Adjustor to be within the context of the
original decision.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENZ'
1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable
to the Planning Director/designee sha11 be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior
to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance
at access points is not obscured or impaired. Finding of Fact/Conclusion #9 provides guidance for
the side yard (front yard) landscaping. Three to four feet of landscaping at the front, beneath the
sign and between driveway ingress/egress points.
2. A specific development plan shall be submitted for Planning Department review and
approval prior to issuance of building pennits. Construcrion must be judged as proceeding
according to the plan or constitute a zoning violation.
HD/VE-13-94(A-C) Crapo
, t . . .
CASE NO. VE-13-94(A-C) SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4
3. The folir fcc)t fences in place may contintie to exist without necessity to be altered to f
fee t .
lll. DEPAR'I'itilEiti`I' Of' BliILDlN(iS
1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage ot
design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as
authorized by the State Build.ing Code Act Design/development concerns include: Fire Apparatus
Access Roads; Fire Hydrant/F'low; Approved Water Systems: Building Accessibility; Construction
Type; Occupancy Classification; Exiting; Exterior Wall Protection; and Energy Code Regulations.
2. Ptior to issuance of an occtin<incv pe- rmit, the landscapin;o, znd narkina lavour/sn-ipin~j
need to be accomplished.
IV. DIVISION OF UTILITIES
None is reported/needed.
V. HEALTH DISTRIC'I'
None is reported/needed.
VI. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
None is reported/needed.
NOTICE: PENDIIVG COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED
TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR T0 PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMTTS MAY BE RELEASED
PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF TBE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER, THE
COUNTY HAS NO LIABII.ITY FOR EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY
1'I-E APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS OVERT'URNED OR ALTERED UPON
APPEAL.
~ ~
DATED this day of August, 1994.
THO G. SHER, AICP
ning A 'ustor
Spokan County Washington
FILID:
1) Applicant (Certified/Return Receipt Mail)
2) Opponents of Record
3) Spokane I?ivision of Engineering and Roads
4) Spokane County Health District
HD/VE-13-94(A-C) Crapo
, S . . .
CASE NO. vE-13-94(A-C) SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 5
5) Spokane County Division of Urilities
6) Spokane County Departcnent of Build.ings
7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
8) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File
NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL
WI'TTHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF T'I-E ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL
MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE
SPOK:.ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING, 1026 W.
BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Section 14.412.042 of the Zoning Code for Spokaiie
Countv).
H P,N li 13 ~)l ; A
~ cr:„<
I
r
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# CIJE=013-94.94
Related File # ( )
Date to Review 6-21-94 Time 9:00 # Z
Date to AA & DR Time
Date Received 6-15-94
Project Name EXISTING-DAYCARE UR-22/FRONTAGE 90'(CODE No. Lots 1 No.Acres 17,SF
125')/ FENCE 4"(CODE 6')/LANDSCAPE 4'(CODE 20')
section - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS S MISSION/W SULLIVAN PARCEL # 14541-0204
Applicant's Name MELISSA A CRAPO Phone # 924-3229
qq'D3 7
Address 15321 E MISSSION AVE-VERADALE WA•"0.2L17 Work # 926-0515
Date Conditions mailed
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZONE d NO W S SCHOOL
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name
Planning Contact Person Plione # 456-2205
,r
Date Submitted Description Initials
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
NOTTCE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATTON SUBMITTED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPRUVEMZNTS
HEARING EXAM _APPROVED _DENIED-_APPEALED BBC / YItUJECT _APPROVED _DENIED
I
f
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
-CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS- `
TO: Spokane County Planninq Department, Zoning Adjustor
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard!5i,-
DATE: June 20, 1994
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE #CUE-13-94 / CRAPO, MELISSA A
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following comments are offered for inclusion in the
Findings and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be
approved.
SPECIAL INFORMATION:
The existing paving, curbing and sidewalk improvements which are
located along the frontage of the proj ect were installed in accordance
with ZE-110-80. No further conditions of approval are required at
this time.
, -
• ' t
, t
10 l.. _
S P O K A N E
PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR
1 V (0 4 ii(C1& (OF V 11 `iY Kl]]` V E CQW 14 11 il Lf..! T.-,.
DATE: June 22, 1994
TIME: 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE: Spokane County Public Works Building
Commissioners Assembly Room
1026 W. Broadway
)pokane, WA 99260
iGENUA ITEM Z File: CE-13-94/VE-13-94 (A-C)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DAY CARE CENTER AND THREE
VARIANCES FROM MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR A DAY CARE
CENTER AND LANDSCAPING STANDARDS
LOCATION: In the east centra.i Spokane Valley, norch of and adjacent to Mission
Avenue, approximately 250 feet west of Sullivan Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 14,
Township 25N., Range 44 E.W.M. 15321 E. Mission Avenue.
PROPOSAL: Continue to opera.te an existing, day care center. The Urban Residential-
22 (UR-22) zone, § 14.622.240.4 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County,
allows such a use upon issuance of a conditional use pernut. The following Variances are
also sought:
(a) 90 feet of frontage; whereas § 14.622,240.4.b of the Zoning Cale requires 125
feet
(b) Four (4) foot ta11 fencing enclosure of the play area; whereas § 14.622.240.4.c of
the Zoning Code requires a six (6) foot fence; and
(c) three (3) and four (4) feet of landscaping at the street frontage; whereas §
14.806.040.2.a of the Zoning Code requires 20 feet of Type III Landscaping.
EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residenrial-22 (UR-22)
SITE SIZE: Approximately 17,000 square feet
APPLICANT: Melissa A. Crapo
15321 E. Mission Avenue
Veradale, WA. 99037
SEPA statement: Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), the
Environmental Checklist and other data was reviewed and the project was found to not
have any probable significant adverse impacts to the physical environment. A
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on behalf of the Spokane County
Planning Director, the responsible official under SEPA. The SEPA Environmental
Checklist and DNS were sent to agencies of jurisdiction and expertise and identified public
interest organizations. Comments regarding environmental matters will be accepted at the
'I lU._U ~~r',__:1I.,'':'. • ~:'t_'F..-.'.;k_ ~~'~ill.":i:~,; ))_?t,fl-~~_'-~l1 • ~;~`Jj.J:---ti;i
~
, , .
hearing. Formal appeal of the DNS may be filed. Contact the Planning Department for
details.
P6ysically Disabled Access: All meetings and 6earings will be conducted in facilities
whic6 are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particular information, please
contact the Spokane County Planning Department at (509) 456-2205.
NOTE: T'HE ZONING ADNSTOR WILL ISSUE A VVIEtITI'EN DECISION TO APPROVE OR DENY
THE ABOVE PROPOSAL. ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF REC4RD MAY
APPEAL THE ZONING ADNS'POR DECISION AND NitJST DO SO WTTHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR
DAYS OF T'HE DATE OF THE DECISIONS SIGNING. APPEALS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A$210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SPOKANE
COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUII..DING, 1026 WEST BROADWAY, SFOKANE, WA 99260
(SECTION 14.412.042 OF THE ZONING CODE OF SPOKANE COUNTY). THE ABOVE
REFERENCED FILE MAY BE EXAMINED AT TI-iE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
i
I
~ •
r
ClUE=13=94/VE=13=94(A=C)
!!R ' U V t `C ~
• ~ ~ 1 I ~ M = 0T
,
IN
GE
i ` ~c H ~ 4
_ '
~ ` ~ . ~'r.` w • ~
.o ADER
. .
~N ' ` _ -
-
s ~
VE
-
? s.~r. w • Z r
~N• ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ •
AT/► ~ ~ , ~ I DGE
o N*4S06
ac • .
A Q
r♦ ~ r
A V E Ro^o W: Ati• ~►v E
14 ^ . ~ Fi rc
n `.oq+res'yY~ Stotion '
. W ool••.~ '
AL-Ki
. .
~I z ~ v 0
. .
cc
~
m a
. ~
~
.
~ W ~
~ ~
~ Ri r-J t'
r, _r-
~ ~ Rwc '
S PRIIGU E
. , . . . . . . . . .,.r.t„',~: ~ •
312
• ~ PiOA'v* "i VE ~ ALE
~ J
. ~
.
SppKANE COLTNTY PLAs1NING DEPARTMENT
APP I ATIONS B.FOR • THE Z
Name of Apphcant: L~r I w~roer ~ulc~ e lenrneefAgent Y ~j'4~a
, xvlr. T~c
Street Address:
•Zip Phone - Home: ~ -3~~
C1C~I• Vp--mJ rL e-, St1te: -ft ~`•OdC• WO1~C: qejn - b 5' 15
.
Agent's No.:-'AA29
.
Name of Property Owner(s)• hwil IS aviJAe 1
Street Address: J 5 ME.
- Zip Phone - Home: - ZQ
Ci,ty Verad& P. State: Code• _q9 1) a7 Work: q 21.e - bS J 5
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate a,ction):
(Variance(s)') ~nditional Use Perani~ Expansion of a
ptherf Nonconforiming Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Violationi/
Sectior-W Township Range ~ Enforcement: Y N
•Lot and legal checked by: •CW'WP sewer purveyor: UA&
✓ •CWSP water purveyor: •CUP standards met: Y N NA7
•Existing zone: - Cite applicable section:
•Comp. P1an designation• 11 •Arterial Road Plan designation:
•Fire Ihstrict: •Person doing preapp conf.: 41""
•Other/previous P ' g~artment actions involving this property:
~o ~
•Certificate of Exemption No.: Appl~catioa No.; CU~ -L3 -t4
•Hearing Date: ~(~t~~~ •Site plan dimensioning checked by:
-
ABOUT THE PROPERTY by 8p liCdnt) t~S~
:Desm-ibe Existing use of ProPertY_ . ~
~ proosed use of the Ty erty, noting change frona'existing use'. 7n nP~ U.12- 2,2
Prlajonned ' tA-6r- -tyl
• a vanance a hcation, state the Code stan ard and des ' the vanance sought in
t comparable
' e., 50 feet from cent luie v ' 65 feet~
erms (i ~ ) 14+1 a
ff-c- -if IMPA w ~
.W~
r 3iD Ifd vVat IQv' cx-
•If a conditional use ~~~t application, does propos meet all stan a.rds? Y i e Pem.,
If not, has one or more vanances been requested? N 0 + ~~e6 • ob 4~p
•What is the size of the subject property. ~of79~ •Street address of proP~Y (if known): 1 •Le al description of property (include easement, if applicable): } r ' -11
►_k. LIa a na ~ .1Jor~ ~ n adj a ~ent f~ .
•Par+cel ivo(s).: 021)+
•Source of legal: ,~~~n r' ~diet-.fi oyl rY1~ n•- •Total annount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor andlor agent: ! QOa/e
•What interest do you (applicant) hold m the property? OW Mer
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S
C4UNTY OF SPOKANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY 4F PERJURY, THAT. (1) I AM TBE OVVNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR Z'HE PROPOSED STTB; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION
FROM OWNER AUTHORFLING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/FIER BEHALF IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF
THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENfS ARE MADE TRUTIEF[)LLY AND
'PO TIM BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
.
' ned• Date Alil AY
(h -ey
N tary lic in an te of Washin resi '
:.7y '
pointrnent exp~res: _
page 1 of 2
ZA,/APP (REV 1 /94)
A. BURDEN OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant)
Jt is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the
REQUESTED ACI'ION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor
of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a foim far your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which
addresses thP critena which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and retum
it with your dpplication.
B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
(applicant must visit each agency whose no. is circled betow)
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRI ,
Proposed method of water supply:
b) Proposed method of sewa e disposal: S~
p/ ,
A prelinunary consultation ha~~een held to discuss the proposal The applicant has been informed
of reWrneti(S and s tandards We request consultation with Planning Deparnnent Y N
ign< < <re) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
2. SPOKA►NE COUNTY PUBLIC ~VORKS DEPARTMENT
~ ' (Engi eering & Roads Division)
A preliV*ts mia cons tatihas been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of s dards. We request consultation with Planning Depardment Y N
61
(Signature) (Date) ( i -off Waived)
SPUKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waive
~ if outside VV'RTMA)
A preluninary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been mfornaed
of requirezw .
1- gy
(Signatwre) (Datie) (Sign-off Waived by Planning?)
The applicant is required to (hscuss the proposal with 44,
to become informed of water system
requirements and standards. (See #a below)
The apphcant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and stand.ards. (See #b below)
a . WATER PURVEYOR: VPAA
The proposal is& no.Llocated within the boundary of our future servi,ce area.
2) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our curnent distnct
3) We n able to serve tlus site wnth adequate water.
4) Saasfactory arrangements have/have nQl been made to serve this proposal.
(Signature) (Date)
. SEWERAGE PURVEYOR:
i~
A preliminary consultadon has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been
informed of requirements and standards.
(Signature) (Date)
,
page 2 of 2
7n/nrr (Rrv 1/94)
• ,
4
`
/,J 17 rI eW L./ t / / 4-s' L/r I r' • o - - • • ; G~ r .f '
j L.ITTLE I.EARNER
his GHlLD DEVELf~PMENT GENTEA, 1NC ~ E,15321 M1SS10N
VERADALE, VItA 99437
CONDI'TIQNAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROUF FORM
Name: t'oRAP.Z)
i •lV• r T~
V. QQNDITIONAL USES State Law, Section 36.70.420 (7), clarif'jes that the Gounty
regulations tnust sgecify the standarads and criteria that shall be
applied in the review by the 2oning Adjustnr. Addidonally,
+condidan af appraval may be added to assure compatibility with
other uses in the same zone.
A, Assurning the proposal is listed as a"geraaitted" vondidonal use, do you believe the
pmposal meets all vf the required, established and applicable standards7
. •
wil, 13L&J ~t. =f J aY1 Le,.# `be n m
~ .
8 If you cannat meet the conditional uses required standards you seeking relief by
applying for an adnninisaative excepdan or a Vari,ance7 es No (Circle One)
C. What have you done or could you do to:
1. Make the use oompatible with vther pernutteti acaviaes in the same vicinity ar
zone?
J-ocafioyl aAd tapi -Ly ~
LLf- 4-k~ ti s K Hy
2. Ensure against impasing excessive d u n public utiGdes?
, ' ~ l , , ~ r
F- de. r~
t, ri . y~~
" ~r,' i`~"
D Explain how or why the pmposal will not be detrimental ta: , , .
1. The Cumpreher~sive Plan: is
Ole
.
~
J ALO -A
~ ; an
f
2. s uxrounding roperty:
E What reasanable restrictions, eonditions ar safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent
(health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Code AN]],~ mitigate any adverse
effect upon the neighbarislg pmperties ineluding but not limited to; 1} ume limits; 2}
. fmnt, side or rear ysrd greatter tharl miinimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing,
5} aff-street parking; and b) others?
btf~p-.1 Lzarwr_ C...kilol nevr~~~~ 4mkr ts k,&qkz1 a4-
15-S21 ~q2Q,3.-/. T
oe,%./ ['~t~ry~]h'c~rl.•
-L=Qr q A ~.1? por-HDALd 40e c4mj MwM -o4 and
• - 7~1 ownwT. iknnf s&f Yd 4aLs--:54- , Crgrpa
iT~ad u ~2-.~2. e~ dj i~►~ ae.Se. f-
wi +h vC7 r!o/'l a i 19ro 1 ,~[pect~ec~ n
effmotuss a&L Qajod ~wAl- a,r&.Zo
-AyLS S-h& .-Fians - ~e ~.y-ctllriAA C~Y 15 Ueril~ 6 %
ta. ai& 4mnno4m Aro.n 444- !i ?~v► +/.*-w
rrWW~ lgt am r akreshrJ on4k. ee nd W+? l /
Aip; 4hw, t~ti ldnen yei e4r a Pjw, gLona► EtMYO&C + n4-'1te. eo rh en LLt,
cc:R, sL"RDov oF 140OF PoRMWe j-n ye. 1!t dd'ed ~nd u.dc/i b oncc //'ezou i-c ea 4bL Cm"m"--" ly
RI'V, 3Al
and add,,Fr avua.l c..P-rwa-wrm 46 *{Ile- cann+•ro.o/ ad-e-v- .
Wt hereb reques * ,a c~;ar~ fo appr~,u~, liae. can~r: ~►~Q.~' ~s~ p&r rr„'i-
,a~ vo.-i ee. ~'o ~!.r ttlA M~ E00 p1eveIdp &-p r
•.~--~.G~-~ ~/~t~.J Sr~c~r~+~}~,► ~.,s~.~►~. ~
. f
.
LITTLE LEARNER . ,
CHILD DEVEIOPMENT CENTER. !NC ,
E.15321 MISSION '
VERAOALE, WA 99037
This letter is to file with the conditional use permit.
We request a variance for street frontage landscaping from
I(IP'
required 20' width to L{'W x 291L and 31W x 33h'L in order
to aquire required parking.
Also parking plan inciudes four staff parking stalls. No
more than four staff will be on site at any one time.
Thank you,
~
c~
~
~ .
~
De 's A. apo
Melissa A. Crapo
~h,/ai 1Sc v6lo~on~
S &A41
q o37
~ p
V
14
60L, /1~~jss
-qzb -Qf/ 5 _ , _os,~~--
vr~eS
~ ~omy~
.
~
' y~
v'~'p~~'~'~
~+1C
am
~
l ~ ,bo Y
~
~ - ~~-h -
SjA~
_ L m la
~
W~ p
err~ P
~ L
. ~
_ C
~ c laq
C
~!e
- ~ ~
C
I ~ dj.. ea
.
l .
.
.
4-sv",~
STATE OF WASHiNG'ON
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
TAF G38, B32 21 • Spokane, Wasr-ngton 992204038
April 19, 1994
RE: Special use permit for Little Learner Child
Development Center, East 15321 Mission,
Veradale
To Whom it May Concern:
The Little Learner Child Develooment Center opened with a
state issued provisional license on February 22, 1993.
S ince this date the center has provided qual i ty chi ld care for
the Veradale area.
The licensing division has received no complaints from either
parents or neighbors regarding this center.
This center is reuuesting to expand into the basement of their
center. To do this they must install ground level exits out of the
basement approved by the Department of Community Resources (State
Fire Marshal) office.
The State also requires an outdoor play area of 75 sq. f t. per
child and that this play area must be fenced per WAC 388-150-
320(1). This WAC states the licensee shall provide a safe and
securely fenced or departmer_t approved enclosed outdoor piay
area...
The State has defined "securely :enced" as being a fence four
feet in height. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free
to contact me at the below address.
I have also enclosed my business card for reference.
Sincerely,
s
da S. Ernst, Licensing Specialist
CFS Region 1
LSE:lrb
Encl.
• • ~~f
• / ~
f
• .
C~ .l~- ~ r~'~?'2~U•
. ~ ~ . . zt.
- ~
a.776(0'w
ze
ad
-
i- 9a~
e
~
(:•~~o~
Lv W1rY.,~ ~ ~ C on C.Q•S.l~ • -
_ - - G•v~ _ G.,n_ e~~nP~.o Q.~ ~"~.c~. C~~j.- _ _ _ _
~
aCXL~ c
-ac~-_ .A ,
J
C~,.'c
l ~
1\(-\o~ c>.r ~
~
c a~ ca,b ~'r G. qd
~ v
o f YV., IN C*- U- ~ A- CkAd
~ 1~. ~~.o► ~ ~ w'.'c1r~ S r~~~ e~.~ ~
~
.
C e,c S~. e e. c~~ ~c
~ ~v
•c.l uClt,d1~
~o C' Cv, % Srur\ v e,d' `S v c. 1r\ , n
,
I..) a,
~~~A,~ ~ ~ov\~ ~v ~ c c
~
:1~ NRave.. D~CSot1C~\ c ~cr~ c~-e.~e,~ ~~1.t:
SL ~ ~O '~C G~ G~, ~(L ~ ~ 1 C Y1d ~ ~'~C~
VJ 4V
C.o \rv-C~ CX\
~
LA 3
April 18, 1994 To Whom It May Coacern:
I would highly recommend the Little I,earner to any parent. It has been so nice to be able to talk
with Melissa, who has spent the whole day with Elliott, about his day. Elliott brings home
school work on a daily basis so I'm able to see exactiy how he progaressing with his letCer and
number writing skill s, as well as his many and exiremely varied art projects.
They have am excellent selection of non-sexist learning toys and puzzles. An extremely well kept
fish tank. Their sleeping mats look like somet6ing your child could actually be comfortable
enough on to take a good nap. The center is always very clean, and the children are always well
within control. The center is never loud, no loud music is playing in the background. Melissa
is able to hold Ellioit's intere.st, he is never bored.
They have a very large back yard, with lots of age appropriate toys for the children. As well
as climbing toys, they also have balls, hoola hoops and other more interactive toys. The staff
actually plavs catch and other games with the children while they're outside, rather than just sit
on a bench and watch the children.
We have been very pleased wnth the tremendous progress that Elliott has made at the Little
Learner, I'm not only secure in the knowledge that he has been well cared for, but I also feel
that he is learning something everyday.
Sincerely,
.
.
Sherri Whipple
.
• • ,
~
HONnA ~
~ .
E. 8201 Sprsgue • 3pokane, Washing►ton 99212
(509) 927-7000 9 FAX (609) 921-2117
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I HAVE BEEN SENDING MY TWO KIDS, AGES 3 1/2 AND 11 MOS. TO LITTLE
LEARNER CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER FOR CLOSE TO TWO MONTHS NOW. I
JUST HAVE TO SAY WHAT AN EXCITING FACILITY IT IS. MY 3 YEAR OLD
IS NOW WRITING HIS ALPHA BET, TELLING ME AB4UT ALL THE DIFFERENT
KINDS OF DINOSAURS, SINGING NEW SONGS, LEARNING TO SHARE, AND
MAKING THINGS THAT ARE INCREDABLE! EVERY DAY HE IS HAPPY WHEN
I PICK THEM UP AND HE ALWAYS SHOWS ME WHAT THEY DID THAT DAY FOR
CRAFTS. HE IS LEARNING A VERY IMPORTANT LESSON IN SELF ESTEEM, AS
WELL. MY 11 MONTH OLD IS DOING VERY GOOD THERE AS WELL. HE IS
ALWAYS HAPPY AND IS EXCITED TO SEE THE FAMILIAR FACES EVERY DAY.
I KNOW THAT THE CARE HE GETS IS FIRST CLASS AND I CAN ALWAYS SEE
ON THE DAILY CHART WHAT IT IS HE DID OR DIDN'T DO THAT DAY. I PUT
MY TRUST IN MELISSA IN FEBRUARY, AND I'D DO IT AGAIN IN A MINUTE.
LITTLE LEARNER IS ALWAYS CLEAN. THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL DIFFERENT
OCCASIONS WHERE I HAVE HAD TO COME OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DAY,
AND THE FACILITY WAS SPARKLING CLEAN. THE GROUNDS ARE BEAUTIFUL.
THE UPKEEP TO THE ENTIRE PLACE IS SPECTACULAR. IT IS SAFE AND I
NEVER WORRY ABOUT MY KIDS GETTING HURT OTHER THAN IN NATURAL PLAY.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
SI ~ELY~
, l
~c .
LORI BRE SACHER
,
. •
. •
t• ~
Am-
t?3
- r~ ! M,~ .
~
,
J/U ~ .
• L?!~
_ ~ .
_ - ~
. ~
,1►~ . ~ , _
_ _ ~ ,
~ A •
_ ~~~i~I~~~A~~ _ a~ ' ~ nr ra~~ .-...s ~ .._~~«.a~~.~~ . . _ . . a. I~_
~ ~i~~L/ V ~ _ .e.: ~ _ .`~~~II ~ ~_4_ . _ _ ,
~
~~I ~ • v ~ . ~y~ ~ Y _ - ' " • _ ~ ` c ~~w _~i/~~/~ ~
_ ~
iA~ ~ ` _ ~ v`^~/ s _ s- - - - -
/
~i~%/ ~+f/~/ -~.ei~~ - + ~,,/f/~►~ ~-..~~~I\f~+~ - ~~~V w ~ ~~w+i
[t • /
_ __~.~:~1~. .a~ - _ ~ia.o _ ~ aw~ ~ - _ -
~cvr~ _ ~ ~l~~,~ .~o ' ~ _ .a~ r _
_
_ v _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ' ~o arGC
_ _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _w - _ -w - - -
~ _ _ _~a _ a,o_ _ ~~~lG
frr.e, ~
~~~L~/ MrvY VV - • f ....-r~z - - -
' I- _ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ s. _
. ~
. H
(
,
j- ZhigT 0-7ne- La_9,e~~=12 - -
OiILO 0Ei~'~L_0_J'r~~rT` 15 A C:LeAA1 t lt,lA~?!r1
- ?r TbL'cLC.4R_E__OF_
- YO&k c14~•
66MoU5 1 Al_ Pftv1A1A(6 _ Q uAC.t _ CA2E . _ S 1 ~ _6X P6GT~'
~
A~u,D _~m~~'O5 ?h~C SAir,E F~enm hk2_ SrRFF
&ZV
EFF01ZT tS _ Mg~ Ta AOO&SS S _ :C1_AL CONOMN{S ANt)
5PC-C1FIC IA(s7'f'_t'CMtiS /41Le _AaRC-1ZCD M IF lZEQUelSTdrj .
_ _Fi9CH ~M11.b,5. _.Z'AA)1 V1 puACr_ A1 ..OS i41LE f2'~E.SPE.GTED
1qAO TeNAE. 1). 57-61'3tlRAV' jE _AAD r1g2y PIZo v1 DE
_ GeAtuIA(e- _ ~Azffrrg ftND tAr 7?Ve _ n~/ly
[ZixUWW45, i9u~ QR6 OuvAys ~CPL6 7WRA' tmpAy rd
6,yre, E)MR, euojoces._
_..L Rm _)El&M6 AW-7-D 59E rny CY1 LD MsT! rn9,
Fb1? Wy ReAso,n+` - W "occr_t~owcE . ~ ~qm _ Wcu12C
1tJ 7'HE le4AJ'61.VLE6(9 n"ty CW1.6 15 /WC61 U11t(C
F"RTl ENT C.GI/11l(C-7- U9fZE .-TT_ ! 5 EV r oe1JT" / d
?"Ne 0 AWody _zZ -orZo~ OFr 6-veey
~4t3Cl
1 rlOR1f 1 WCs ~Ama T146 rzE tgX La_bl 14)gAPv 8!
I PlCI6 (,t Per6IZc ~1 G1~T". C1'~Pt NR~5 69~W
~ ~
47AWW16 51AA26 7710- A6e 01:7 7 cd6ocs , Ati'O T
RM Pfl.GFDUNbL.V Gti'eATFl,c(..., l&'C- F-D Lt1t1b
- - - bAlbA i4A~
. ~
, ,
,
♦ ~ s . /
SPOR:ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTTMNT `f
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING AD.TUSTOR
' I
Name of Apphcant: bWt=., 1~ ogr 1d Ie-RrnenfAgent
Street Address: A S'Nby_ ~ ~r 2s~c
Cqo Zip Phone - Home•
City• VtrnfJrt e-, State• kA. Code• Work• qT t2 - bpv5
Agent's No..~~-}
,
Name of Property Owner(s): 1 Aell ~
Street Address: -j 5 . A ISS tc) N ME .
Zip Phone - Home: - 2 ZQ
City• Varado-lio. State• Code: tC, Da7 Work: _q2jo
REQUESTED ACIT4N(S) (Circle appropriate a,ction):
&anance(s),) 0Conditional Use PermiP Expansion of a
Other, 1 Nonconfoiming Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY '
Violationi/
Section Township Range Enforcement: Y N
•Lot and legal checkcd by: •CWWP sewer purveyor:
•CWSP water purveyor: •CUP standards met• Y N NA
•Exisung zone: ~ Cite applicable secaon•
•Comp. Plan designation• •Artenal Road Plan designadon:
*Fire Distnct• •Person doing preapp conf.:
•Other/previous Planiung Department actions involvuig tlus property;
•Cemficate of Exemption No.: Application No.:
•Hearing Date. •Site plan dunensioning checked by:
ABOUT THE PROPERTY 10 p licant)
•Existing use of property L"&/''
•Descnbe pro osed use of the pro erty, noting change from'existing use': zankd- lAk-
ilLo. Qpcm&
• a vanance application, state the Code stan ard and describe the variance sought in comparable
t~ ~(i e., 50 feet from cent rline ~ erses rgquirqd 65 feet): ' ty)rrbn
Yerse s rIpa , a.- 4
4e1& ver
*If a conditional use pennit apphcation, does propos meet all standards? Y~N
If not, has one or more vanances been requested? N •What is the size of the subject property. 0-7 ~
•Street address of property (if known)• 1 - - q 01037
~scnpnon of ProPertY (include easement, if' apphcable): r t-
o `0' ~1 n 4td4GYCe0fi-~
T
•Parcel No(s).: ~514 I . dl-oAI- .
•Source of legal. 5e~.t,i art rnan
•Total amount of adjouung land controlled by'this owner, sponsor andlor agent: ~p
•What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? - D~p(,ner-
STATE OF R/ASHINGPON ) S S
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
I SWEAR, LJNDER PENALTY OF PERTURY, THAT: (1) I AM TBE OVVNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED STTE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION
FROM OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED, AND (3) ALL OF
THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTIlNG DOC'UAdENTS ARE MADE TR Y AND
'PO TBE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
.
ed: Date AII» 1-4
- .
N tary ~Gu hc in and for state of V~aslun n, res i .g at
_ - . . y appointment expires: _
: page i of 2
ZA/APP (REV ]04)
r
1
s ~
s
. f
A. -BIJRDEN^ UF PR+DOF form(s) (by applicant)
zt is necessary for the applicant or Ins/her representaave ta establish the reasons why the
- REQUESTED AC'TIaN should be approved and to literally put fozth the basic argument in favor
flf approvmg the apphcation. Accvrdxney, you should have been given a form for your requested
aclxon (variance,, conditional use, etc,) designed to help you gresent your case in a way which
addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return
it with your applscation.
B. SIGN-+DFF BY C(3UNTY DEPARTMENTS A.ND t7THER AGENCIES
(appiicant must visif each agency whase no. is circled below)
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRI
Pmposed methoci af water supply. 9#J-4e,
b) Proposed method of sewage dzspvsal;
A prehmmmary cansul.tation has been held to discuss the groposal. The apphcant has be.en mfanmed
of reqwirements and standards. We request consultation with Plan,ning Deparrmaent Y N
(Signature) (Daroe) (Sign-off Waived)
0 2. SPOKANE COUNTY FUBLIC 'PVORKS DEPA.RTNTENT
En i eerin & Roads Division
( g ~ )
A prelunin cons ~tati~a has been held to discuss the gmposal. The applicant has been infazmed
of require ts s dards. We request cansultation vnth Plannmg Departmeni Y N
IL
(Signature) (Date) ( i -off Wauved)
Y
t.~ 3. SP4KA.NE CUUNTY UTILITIES I)EPARTMENT (Planning Department may waYVe
if outside W'WMA)
A prelimuzary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been ulformed
of requirements and tan s,
_ 'y_l/_
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Plaruung?) The appucant is requued ta discuss the proposal with 4"~
to become infornaed of water system
re,quirements and stanzd.ards. (See #a beivw)
j l The applicant is xequired t4 discuss the proposal with
to become ulformed af sewage dispasal
requirements and standards (See #b belaw)
a . WATER PURVEYOIZ: ORA
The proposal -is ib noLlocated within the boundary of our futur+e service area.
2) The proposal i i n located within the boundary af our cutrent distnct.
3) We arelare not able to serve this site with adequa.te water.
4) Satxsfactory arrangements hUelh not been ma+de to serve this proposal
(Signature) (Date)
. SE'9V'ERAGE PURVEYOR: r~
i~
A preliminaryy consultation has been held to d.iscuss the praposal.. The apphcant has been
lnfarmed of requrrements and standards.
(Signature) (Date)
~
page 2 of 2
ZA/APP (REV 1/94)
~
.
.
.
.
~
4. - - -
PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT
Date ~ ~ +P/2 ~ Number
Name MEU 55A Phone
~
Address I-S 3 (
0A1A-
Comments v~1 QrT~
CUSTOMER ROUTINC
~ '`~tmeht
>(GiNEER'S Dep ~
( BUILDING DepaKment y ~ PLANNiNG DepaKment
I Addre.ssing ~ Admin. Exoeption ~ Approach Permit
$uddinA Pecmit i Artena! Rd Pfan tnfo = Flood Plam Permit
Code Inlonnation ~ Bindtng Site Plan Info , Public/Pnvate Roads
, Commercial Review ~ Cert of F.xempuon = Res. Bldg Permit Rev.
+ Conferenoe ~ Comprehensrve Plan ~ Site Dramage Info
L Energy Code Info ~ Cond. Usc Permit = Subdrvision Revsew
~Fire Safery Rcwew : Nonoonforming Use : Unlity Permit
I Manufactured Home ~ Pcrmit Review , Zone Change Review
Mechanical Periaits Shorelines Info ~ ~ ~ ~ •
( Other Permits ~ Short Plat lnfo NO FEE iJIRED
- ~ ;~tev~e Tim out ,
i Plumbing Permits = Subdnnsion info C- C-do
i pnvate Road Info , Temp. Use Perrnit It.MUTIES OepaMment
+ Residential Re"ew Vananoe Appl. ~ APA Payrnent
Sew~er Perrnits ~ Zone Check , Cert. of Exemption
Zone Info ~ SubdivLsion Review
ULIDiSewer Info
i Zone Change Review
~ i NO F7?F. RIiQUIKLD = NO •:P. RF3QUIRED
Rcvicwrr Time out Rcvicwer Time out Revicw+er Time out
%VASTI RPti%SPORI C'Ilt 111693
r
. ~
W •
RECEIPT SUMMARY
TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9400631 DATE: 04/11/94
APPLICANT: MELISSA CRAPO PHONE=
ADDRESS: 15321 E MISSION AVE
VERP,DALE WA 99037
CONTACT NAME: MELISSA CRAPO PHONE=
TRANSACTION: CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION
DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3)
4) 5) 6)
COMMENTS: FOR PARCEL #45141.0204
FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY
ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT
CONDITIONAL USE 1 50.00
TOTAL DUE = 50.00
TOTAL PAID= 50.00
BALANCE OWING= .00
, PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CH£CK# PAYMENT AMOUNT
04/11/94 00003672 1702 50.00
PROCESSED BY: KATHY SQUIRES
PRINTED BY: KATHY SQUIRES
THANK YOU
f~~r ~ . .
. l ~
~ ` ~
~ ~ ~ ~
J ~ ~~t
-
a
1
4' ~
~
, ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ . ~
~
. ~
~
~ ?
~ ~
1
~ ~
~
,
~
,
_
' j ,~f -
' ~~n~.
~ .r--
~ _
~ _
~
~ ~
~ 1
~ i
~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
. ~
~ ~ . ~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~ ~
;
~
. ~ ~ ,
.
""4 1
1
~
~ '
~ ~ - ,
~ ~ ' .
~ ~ ~ _
~
. ~ ~}e~- ~ .
~ ~ ~
f 'p
Y
4 -
,
~
t
~ ~ "
1 .
~
~
~ •
~ , '
~ , ~ _ ' .
~f ~
~ ~ . r ~ + ~ ~l
~ t ~ R ~,~t
~ ~ .
~ ~'i _ . _ _ , f