The URL can be used to link to this page

CUE-9-02 R ~ J SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER RE Condrtional Use Permit, for Expanston of a ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Nonconformulg Use, in Mining (MZ) Zone, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, Applicant Brown & Hill Properties LLC ) AND DECISION File No CUE-09-02 ) ) Tlus matter coming on for public heanng on December 11, 2002, the Heanng Exammer, after review of the condltlonal use permit application and the entire record, and finding good cause therefore, hereby makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision I FINDINGS OF FACT 1 The application requests a conditional use permrt for expansion of a nonconfornling warehouse use, in the Mirung (MZ) zone 2 The site is located east of and adjacent to Tschirley Road, approxunately 700 feet north of Euclid Avenue, Ln the SW '/4 of Sectlon 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington 3 The site ls currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel no 5506 0175, and has an address of 3420 N Tschirley Road, Spokane, WA 4 The applicant for the proposal and the site owner is Brown & Hi11 Properties, c/o Ty Brown, 4320 N Tschirley Road, Spokane, WA 99206 5 The Hearing Examiner heard the application pursuant to the County Heanng Examiner Ordinance (County Resolution No 96-0171) and the County Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure (County Resolution No 96-0294) 6 The Exarmner conducted a site visrt on December 10, 2002, and conducted a public heanng on the proposal on December 11, 2002 The requirements for notice of public hearing were met 7 The following persons testified at the pubhc heanng James Richardson Scott Engelhard Division of Planning Division of Engineenng and Roads 1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane, WA 99260 Ty Brown Dan Fhll 11828 E Kalb Rd 3420 N Tschirley Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99216 HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 1 0 A ~ 8 The County Division of Planning issued a Detennination of Nonsignificance for the proposal on November 26, 2002 9 The Heanng Examiner takes notice of the County GMA Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan, Phase I Development Regulations, County Resolution Nos 2-0037 and 2-0470, County Zonulg Code, 2001 Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, County Code and other applicable development regulations 10 The record tncludes the documents in the project file at the time of the public heanng, the documents and testirnony submltted at the public heanng, and the items taken notice of by the Hearing Examiner 11 The site is approximately 67 acres in size, irregular in shape and relatively flat in topography An existing wholesale warehouse building is found along the west side of the northerly two-thirds (2/3) of the site, including 3,930 square feet of warehouse space and 450 square feet of office space The office space has four tenants associated with the warehouses uses in the building, but has only two persons in the office A mobile home is located on the site east of the warehouse building, and a second mobile home is found in the northwest corner of the site near Tschirley Road T'he mobile homes are used for caretaker purposes The existing warehouse, wholesaling and office uses, and one of the mobile homes used for caretaker purposes are legal nonconforming uses 12 The conditional use pernlit application and site plan of record were submitted on October 9, 2002 The site plan of record illustrates the existing warehouse building, and a proposed single-story, 16-foot lugh, 3,210-s9uare foot addition to the building along its north side Access to the expanded warehouse would be via a single approach to Tschirley Road Employee parking and truck loading areas are also shown duectly west of the expanded warehouse The warehouse addition would be used to store used medical equipment and supplies, lncluding refngerated storage 13 In 1980, the site was rezoned to Mining (Class IIH) under the now expired County Zoning Ordinance, to allow sand and gravel extraction Effective January 1, 1991, the zorung of the site was reclassified to the Mining (MZ) zone, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zomng Code 14 Effective January 15, 2002, the County Lmplemented a new comprehensive plan ("GMA Comprehensive Plan"), Capital Facilities Plan, County Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundanes, and Phase I Development Regulations, all pursuant to the State Growth Management Act (GMA) The County also repealed the intenm development regulations previously adopted by the County under the State Growth Management Act See County Resolution No 2-0037 Minor revisions were made to the Phase I Development Regulations on May 7, 2002 See County Resolution No 2-0470 15 The Phase I Development Regulations designate the site and the land in the vicinity in the Heavy Industnal category of the GMA Comprehensive Plan, and in the Urban Growth Area The HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 2 a , J land surrounding the site is zoned Light Industrial (I-2) or Heavy Industnal (I-3), and consists of inactive sand and gravel excavation sites and industrial uses 16 The location of two (2) mobile homes on the site for caretaker purposes violates the Zoning Code, and one of the mobile homes must be removed from the site The applicant intends to remove the mobile home located in the northwest portion of the site, which interferes with the proposed warehouse building expansion The proposal should be condihoned for removal of one of the mobile homes 17 The site is located outside the County's 6-year Sewer Caprtal Improvement Program area, and public sewer is currently unavailable to the site The Phase I Development Regulations do not require conditional use permit applications for land located in the UGA to comply with sewer and water concurrency requirements if the proposed use will not result in an increased amount of wastewater generated on the site 18 The record indicates that the existing on-site sewage disposal system is adequate to serve the existing uses on the site and the proposed warehouse expansion, subject to removal of one of the mobile homes on the site The proposal is, accordingly, exempt from sewer and water concurrency requirements Public water currently serves the subject property and is avallable for the expansion 19 The proposal is exeinpt from transportation concurrency requirements based on the determination by County Engineenng that the proposal will have an insigruficant transportation impact, and will not change the traffic volumes and flow patterns in the PM peak hour travel penod 20 The site is not designated as Mineral Land Due to the site size and the lack of any evidence that the site has long-term commercial significance as mineral land, the subject property generally does nofi meet the cnteria in the Comprehensive Plan for deslgnation as Mineral Land The highest and best use for the site appears to be industnal, rather than mining 21 Warehousing and wholesaling uses, and associated office and caretaker uses, are not permitted in the MZ zone, but such uses are permitted in the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone Mirung is permitted in both the I-3 zone and the MZ zone The I-3 zone is the only zone intended to implement the Heavy Industnal category, the category in wluch the site is designated 22 No opposition was expressed with regard to the proposal The Health District requested that one of the mobile homes on the site be removed and that barriers be placed around the existing sewage drainfield to protect vehicular traffic on the sewage dtsposal system 23 As conditioned, the proposal will not have more than a moderate effect on the quality of the environment and will be reasonably compatible with neighbonng land uses HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 3 0 , < 24 The proposal complies with the development standards of the MZ zone, except with regard to use The Zoning Code discourages the expansion or extension of a nonconforming use, but authonzes an expansion through the conditional use permit process Based on the above Findings of Fact, the Heanng Exanuner enters the following II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1 The proposed conditional use permit to allow expansion of a nonconforming wholesale warehouse use, in the Mining (MZ) zone, as condltioned, conforms to the GMA Comprehensive Plan 2 The proposal is consistent with the general purpose of the County Zoning Code, set forth in Section 14 100 104 of the Zoning Code, the development standards of the MZ zone, other than use restrictions, and other applicable development regulations 3 The proposal, as conditioned, is reasonably compatible with other uses permitted in the MZ zone or located in the vicinity of the proposed use 4 The proposal, as conditioned, reasonably mitigates any adverse impacts on adjacent properties by reason of use, extension, construction or alteration allowed with respect to the conditional use 5 The proposal, as conditloned, will not have a sigruficant, probable, adverse impact on the environment The requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance have been met 6 The proposal, as conditioned, satisfies the requirements for issuance of a conditional use pennit under Chapter 14 404 of the County Zoning Code, and for expansion of a nonconforming use under Sectlon 14 508 040 of the County Zonulg Code 7 Approval of the land use application, as conditioned, is appropriate under section 11 of the County Heanng Examiner Ordinance, as adopted by County Resolution No 96-0171 III. DECISI4N Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a conditional use permit to allow the expansion of a nonconforming wholesale warehousing use, in the Nhning (MZ) zone, as hereby approved, subject to the conditions of approval specified below Any public agency conditions that have been sigruficantly altered or added to are italacized Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation or suspension of this approval by the Hearing Examiner Thls approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to comply wrth all other requirements of other agencies with j unsdiction over land development HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 4 SPOKANE COUNTX DIVISION OF PLANNING 1 All conditions imposed by the Heanng Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner and developer of the property, and their heirs, assigns and successors 2 The Conditional Use Permit applies to the parcel legally descnbed as "That portion of Tract 72 of PLAT NO 3 WEST FARMS rRRIGATED TRACTS descnbed as follows COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Tract 72, thence along the Easterly nght of way of Tschirley Road North 01 °OS'33" West 150 feet, thence North 89°47' East 225 feet, thence South 67°OS' 15" East 112 55 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Tract 72342 93 feet to the point of begulning, EXCEPT the West 10 feet of Tschirley Road, in the SW 1/4 of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, in Spokane County, Waslungton " 3 The applicant shall develop the subject property in conformance with the site plan of record submitted on October 9, 2002, subJect to compliance with conditions of approval and regulation standards Vanations, when approved by the County Division of Planiung Director or designee, shall only be allowed to meet conditions of approval and regulation standards Any other revision must be submitted through a change of condition application, and approved after a public heanng by the Hearing Examiner 4 The proposal shall comply with the Mining Zone (MZ), the Aqulfer Sensrtive Overlay zone, and other applicable provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended 5 No further expansion of the nonconforming warehouse use or conversion to other industrial uses shall be permitted until the property is reclassified to an appropnate industnal zone desig.nation Abandon.ment of the current use for 12 or more consecutive months shall tenninate the nonconformmg use nghts authonzed under the Condrtional Use Permit 6 One of the mobale homes located on the sate shall be removed prior to assuance of a bualding permit for the warehouse axpansion, or such earlier tame as requared by County Planning or the Spokane Regzonal Health Dastract 7 The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice, which notes that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special condrtions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action The Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the condrtaons of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded witlun the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows "That portlon of Tract 72 of PLAT NO 3 WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TR.ACTS descnbed as follows COMMENCING at the Southwest comer of sald Tzact 72, thence along the Easterly nght of way of Tschirley Road North 0 1 °05'33" West 150 feet, thence North 89°47' East 225 feet, thence South 67°OS' 15" East 112 55 feet to a point on the HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 5 Southerly line of Tract 72342 93 feet to the point of beginning, EXCEPT the West 10 feet of Tschirley Road, in Spokane County, Waslungton" is the subject of a land use action approved by the Spokane County Heanng Examiner on January 23, 2003, approving a conditional use permit for a nonconforming use and imposing a variety of special de-velopment conditions File No CUE-09-02, which relates to such action, is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planrung " SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUTLDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT 1 The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authonzed by the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building acccssibility, construction types, occupancy classification, existing extenor wall protection and energy code requirements SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed: 1 A parlang plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and must be accepted by the Spokane Counfiy Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard englneenng practices Note The existing head-in parking stalls along Tschirley Road are considered legally non- conforming parking stalls If the current use of thls facility changes from the existing warehouse use, then the non-conforming parking stalls will need to be relocated somewheze else on the site to meet current parking standards Current parking standards will not allow any expansion of the existing head-in parking in the future 2 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drai-nage plan requirements are found in Spokane County Resolution No 1-0298 as amended and are appllcable to this proposal 3 No construction work is to be performed wlthin the exishng or proposed public nght-if-way until a permlt has been lssued by the County Engineer All work is sub3ect to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 4 Approach permits must be obtained from the County Division of Engineenng and Roads prior to any access to the Spokane County Road System 5 The applicant is advised tllat utilities may exist erther underground or overhead that affect the applicant's property or the adjacent county nght of way The County assumes no financial obligation for adjustrnents or relocation regarding these uhlities The applicant should contact the applicable utility purveyors regarding the responsibilrty for adjustment or relocatlon costs and HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 6 0 ~ to make arrangements for any work A permit is required from the County Englneer for any work performed in the County nght of way 6 The County Engineer has reviewed the project for transportation concurrency and determined that it is exempt under Section IV (B)(2)(c) of the Phase I Development Regulations adopted by the County SPOKANE COUNTY STORMWATER UTILITY 1 Spokane County does not own or operate a regional stonnwater conveyance system As a result, the applicant is responsible for providing on-site control of stormwater runoff from newly constructed impervious surfaces 2 Dralnage shall not be diverted and/or released to a downstream property at points not receiving drainage pnor to the proposed development 3 The srte is located wrthin the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone In order to mitigate the potential for groundwater degradation, all stormwater runoff from land developed within the such zone shall be treated pnor to discharge to a drywell or other approved disposal point The preferred method of treatment is through a bio-filtration swale (formerly referred to as a"208" swale or a grassed percolation area) SPOKANE COUNTY DIVTSION OF UTILITIES 1 All wastewater facilities for this project shall be provlded in accordance with the Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan for Spokane County and the Spokane County Zorung Code Phase One Development Regulations as amended 2 The proposal lles outside of the current Spokane County Six-Year Sewer Capital improvement Plan Conditional Use Permits that generate an increase in sewage flow are required to connect to the Sanltary Sewer System Conditional Use Pernuts that do not generate an increase in sewage flow may use an exishng on-srte sewage disposal system with the approval of the Health Distnct SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT 1 A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spokane Regional Health Distnct prior to the issuance of any on- site sewage disposal permit or building permit for this project 2 The sewage disposal method shall be authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 3 Water servlce shall be coordinated through the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CLTE-09-02 Page 7 0 L 4 Water service shall be by an existmg public water supply when approved by the Regional Englneer (Spokane), State Department of Health 5 The disposal of effluent beneath paved surfaces ls currently prohibited 6 Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system may be authorized 7 One of the two caretaker's mobile home shall be removed from the szte, prior to tssuance of a bualdang permit for the proposed expansion The mobale home left on the sate shall not be located on the draanfield system oY its replacement area A barrier shall be placed around the exastang draznfielcl to prevent velzicular traffic on the sewage disposal system 8 The use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POI..,LUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1 All air pollution control regulations shall be met See letter dated 10-24-02 from SCAPCA in Planning Flle No CLTE-09-02 DATED this 23rd day of January, 2003 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Michael'C Dempsey, WSBA #82 ( HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 8 0 f NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng Examiner on an application for a conditional use permit is final and conclusive unless within twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing files a land use petition in supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is ma.iled, counting to the next business day when the last day for mailing falls on a weekend or holiday This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant, and by first class mail to other parties of record, on January 23, 2003 The date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is therefore January 27, 2003, counting to the next business day when the last day for mailing falls on a holiday or weekend THE LAST DAY FOR APPEAL OF THIS DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS FEBRUARY 18, 2003 (counting to the next business day when the last day for appeal falls on a weekend or holidav) The complete record u1 this mattez, including this decision, is on file dunng the appeal penod wrth the Office of the Heanng Exan-uner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490 The file may be mspected Monday - Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8 30 a m and 5 00 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made ava.ilable at the cost set by Spokane County Pursuant to RCW 36 70B 130, affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision CUE-09-02 Page 9 - _ _ ' NG"r ! I EER'S ~ ~ ~ Status Aedve ~~iliPlans ~~~~ivea Condiftonal L1se File C ' ' ~ -00"~~= ~Z -o2. koa~ Plan_s Approveti Gompanion FiIesn New Road Standards S-l S-9S MylaT M , Re1ated Files: B02007105 Z&0089-$0 Hearing: M'°11'"0.~ Builtlirag Dept; - Tachnicalj Re-view; ❑ Harvard Rd Flan ❑ ~~edal F6sS, Pretimirta-ry Review; 1 0f30I2002 Type: ScheduJed For-- Large ~t Bl'dg. Sq,uare Post . .3214 1?~t~ 12ec~~~~~~: 1~Q11.~12QQ2 ~ NQ. Lots: No. A-cses: 0-67 Pr.aject Name WAREHOUSE EZTANSI4! ' BROVN & ILTLL SiKe Addrt5s N. DAL7'ON,W. IEDEN, S. TREN'Ii', E. TSCHIRLEY, TSCW-JMEY N. 3420 APPIicant CvndsGi4ns Maited: F1ood Zoiie Nts PhQne Qist Schoo4 D;sf 361 Pire DisC O l Range-Townshi:p-Secfion: 45 - 25 - 06 PAMC'~L(S): ft A24} BRQWN & MLL PROFE~`tTiES Water Source Ptiblic 55063.0175 3420 N. Tschirley Rd Scwer Saurce SPqKA-NBz WA 99216- Phane (509) 928-5608 ~ax. (509) 928-347'4 Owner BRONVN & 111T,L Pi2,QPERTIES 3424N. Tschirley Rd SPOiCA:NE, WA 99216- Phan-e (509) 92$-5608 FaX (509) 92$-3474 BuiJd'ing 477-3675, /P1anning 477-7200 IEnai:neer 477-3604 Contacl BIL' jANlED R,~CHATtDSON ContacC En~ G-REG BALD1'~".~' de Subjp~iifted Descriptigii Eng Naed Teohnicalty Complafe Eng Need 14arvard Rt4 Tvlit'gation NNeed Drainage P~aris Eng Need Traffic Arialysi.s Eng Need Qther ~ng 4Agree Pay ~ees Rer,cived Eng Final Plat Fees CQmpleted CQ~PY Acco~ita~, Eng Agtez E 2-ioci~Cy :~ees Received~ 1 QI09/2Oa2 Eag PrePir~ Plat faes ConapletEd Notice to Public 1Notice to Public # t 3 4 6 Completed -or Needs i4 be signed besign DexPiation Daies (1n-Out) ,~t~~ l./ Bo~nd qu~ri~ ~~Icul Hearing Da~e D~c'tsion ARR ~ Den Cornzi Appld BCC ,qppsale(I C4 BCG Decision App L?en Conc3' AAPlc3 C'otirt AppeaJed t4, Court Dacision App Den Conc1 AARld I f Stamped Mylars to Secr,etarY (San.dy) , St~~mped 208 T qt PIans ta Sscrelary ($amdy) ~o/~~~'~~ 4/ ~ . . _ . - - ~ ../~V2!S.~S \ELR'((~'~ IV ~V~♦ ♦ IAJiiEET P1'9f6ct Sfattls Actlve ' - - As Bui1r:I~Iat~s k~.ecei,vtd Conditional Use F"le C~~~OIO~i IO, i~`~ ~'I ~2 - . _ -o2: Roacl P'la-ns t1,ppraved Cornpanion files: 'New R4ad Standards 5-1,5-95 Mylar#: - - Re1atezi Fil'~. 1302097105 Z&4089-80 -Hearinga :12111I2002 10:30 Build'~ing Depi° fiecNnica1Revievv; ❑ Har;va_r,d Rd Plasn ❑ Fnslpeei~ ~eb's . _ • Prelit-ni~~axy Rwvitew°: 10A34I2442 Type: Scheduled For ~-a-re ~t, Bld ~ ua- ~ ~~ee€ • - 32'1 ~O _ Da~« Rece~ivesl: 714%1~~612402 ❑ ~ ~ No. Lois: N o, , Act%; 4e67 - Project Nain& WAREH(?~SE EX-P.ANS-IbN BRQ`VVN HLL - . Sire Adc3ress N. I7.s4LTON'z W. WEN, 5. T12EN I',, E. TSGH-IRLEY, TSGRl"12.LEY N. 3420 . ' . . - . A~ppl`ica~n,t C4n~1iti6'ms IV~aiIe~i: F1QOd ZOnG No_ Phdne Dist Scl~ool D,isr 3b`1 , - . _ • _ Fire Dast 01 Range-TownshiP-Seciion: 45 - 25 - 06 PARCRL-(5);(i-M t 20) . BRQMIN & ~=I.1LL PRO~ER~IE$ WatErSOI►TCe I?ublic 55063.{}175 3420 N. '1'schirYey Rd Sewer Sotyrce SPOKANEEt 1+VA 9921 6- _ Phane (509) 92$-5608 fax (509) 9~2$-3474 • Ov►'ner B ROWN & 141:L-L 1 RQP 6 RT]E, S _ 3424 N. I schirley Rti , - SP4KANE, WA 192 l 6- - :1 Pno„e (509) 928-5608 Fax (549) 92$-3474 Bual'din,jz 477-3675 /Platining 4774200 ~~ngineer 477-3600 Gontact $IP JA,~~tED R1CIJA.RDSbN Contacl' Ene, OItEG BALDVrT,"' - - - _ ~~z S'qi - ~ lDevqcriotion - --Tn•it~~~~ ~ ~ng Need `1`echnicatly Complefe Eng Needi Hanrard -Ri' Mitigafion : - _ Bng Nted Drainage Plans Eng Need I raffic A-nal,ys'is Bng Need Other ' - 'I - _ Eng Agrae Pay Fee,sReceived E„ng Final Plat Fees C4mpleted Bn.g Agree PriQ,ri;ty Fees Received 10I09f2042 `Bng P.reliiii Pla,t ~ees Completed Copy fio A-ecounCing - f ~ NQtice to Pub1ic ~Nodcse tb PiubMic # 1 3 4 6 Compleied - br Needs t4, be signed Desigii Devia[ion Dai'es ('In; Qut) . Band quan6y:es 091'e-u18ted - _ , Hearing Date Dscision App Den Cond alpgld! BCC Appealed tQ BCC Decisio-n App Den _ C-ond App1d Court - ApAealed fi4 C4elrt Decisribn App Den. Cend A'ppld ~ f Stamped M-y~sirs to Sacreiary (Sandy) Sta_mped 20$ k lans to, SecEet'ary (Sandy) - - ~ - , r, I . . - II - _ - - - II . - ' - - a • - , • . i • x, - - . ' - - - , I . _ II 'f li . ' _ ' _ _ , s *L9 _ ' . . - - ~ ~F i - , t ~ J ~ STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER , " File CUE-09-02 OF PLANNING 4FIfl-ffin DIVISION SPOKAlskE COUISUY HEARING DATE: December 11, 2002 at 10:30 a.m. FILE CUE-09-02 PROJECT PLANNER: James Richardson, Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a nonconforming warehouse use in the Mining (MZ) zone. PROJECT DATA: Project Location and Address: The site is generally located east of Flora Road approximately 700 feet north of Euclid Avenue in the SW %4 of Section 6, T 25 N, R 45 EWM. The site address is 3420 N. Tshirley Road. Parcel Number: 55063.0175 Owner: Brown & Hill Properties c/o Ty B rown 4320 N. Tshirley Road , Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 928-5608 :Applicant: As above. Corn,preliensive Plan Designation: Heavy Industrial (HI); effective January 15, 2002 _Existiriq_Zoninq: . Mining (MZ) -=Existin~iLand ,Use: The project site is developed for a wholesale warehouse use. .Surroundinq Zoning and Land Uses: • North: The property immediately north of the project site is zoned Heavy Industrial (I-3) established in 1991 and previously . . classified as Mining Zone (MZ) (File #ZE-80-89) as , established in 1989. This property is presently vacant and undeveloped. ~ -i South: Land immediately south of the project site is zoned Light Industrial (I-2) established in 1991 and previously classified as . . Restricted Industrial (RI) (File #ZE-44-74) as established in 1974. These properties are developed for light industrial uses. " •East:. . Land located immediately west of the project site is zoned Light Industrial (I-2) established in 1991. and previously ' Restricted Industrial (RI) (File #ZE-177-79) as established in 1979. These properties are developed for light industrial uses. -•West:- . Land immediately east of the project site zoned Heavy ~ _ . Industrial (I-3) established in 1991 and previously classified „ - - _ - , as Manufacturing (M) (File #ZE480-58) as established in 1958, and is developed for industrial uses. ';qKnow,n, nd° ;U;se, Proposals -and =Recent` No recent land use actions have been processed in the r aMdt ~ : , Proj;e_ct-Ap,~.rova~~s„in„the Area of'this-Project: , immediate vicinity of the proposal. The project site is recognized as a portion of a platted Iot of , , ; , , - , - - - - record. CUE-09-02 Staff Report - December 11, 2002 Public Hearing 1 • , ~ ` r . r Shoreline Desiqnation: Not applicable. Water Purveyor: Public water service is provided by Consolidated Irrigation District #19. Sewage Disposal: The site is located inside the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and is served by an existing on-site sewer system. Fire District The project site is located in Spokane County Fire Protection District # 1. School District and nearest K-12 schools: The project site is located in East Valley School District #361. The public schools located nearest to the proposal include Skyview Elementary School which is located approximately 1 mile north of the site. East Valley Junior High School, and East Valley Senior High School are located approximately 1'/z miles northwest of the site at Wellesley Avenue and Sullivan Road. Nearest Arterial and Distance: Flora Road is located approximately %4 of a mile west of the project site and is identified by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan as a Urban Minor Arterial. Trent Avenue (SR-290) is located approximately of a mile north of the project site and is identified as a Primary State Highway. Nearest Parks and Distance: No public parks are located in the vicinity of the project site. Neighborhood Association: Otis Orchards Neighborhood Association. • This proposal is located inside the UGA. • This proposal is located outside of any Joint Planning Area • This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA). • This proposal is located inside the 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural Resource Lands (Mineral Land). GMA/CRITICAL AREAS Aquifer Recharge Area: The subject site is located inside the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overiay Zone. Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas: None mapped per the Spokane County Critical Areas Ordinance. Floodplain: Review of FIRM indicates the project site is located in Zone C and outside the 100-year flood plain. Geologically Hazardous: Areas: - None mapped per the Spokane County Critical Areas Ordinance. : Wetlands: The Spokane County Wetland Inventory map for . this area identifies no wetlands within or adjacent . to'the site. SEPA 0 DNS issued November 26, 2002 0 Comment period ended December 10, 2002 NOTICING Published: The Notice of Hearing and DNS were advertised in the Spokesman Review legal section on November 26, 2002. Mailed: Notice of Application and the Notice of Hearing were mailed to taxpayers/owners of property located within 400 feet of the boundaries of the subject site on October 18, 2002 and November 26, 2002, respectively. CUE-09-02 Staff Report - Deoember 11, 2002 Public Hearing 2 . r (.9k Site Posted: The deadline for the applicant to post the site was November 26, 2002. 1724 COMPLIANCE DATES Appiicatlon Submitted: October 9, 2002 Determination of Completeness issued: October 18, 2002 Date Notice of Decision is Due: February 16, 2002 REVIEWING AGENCIES A total of 10 agencies were notified of the proposal and comments were solicited. Final comments were due December 10, 2002. Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notifled Response Date Received Received Received Received Spokane County Division Yes November Spokane County Yes February of Engineering and Roads 5, 2002 Division of Engineering; 4, 2002 Developer Services Spokane County Division No Spokane County No of Utilities Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility Spokane Regional Health Yes October Consolidated Irrigation No District 24, 2002 District #19 East Valley School No Spokane County Air Yes October District # 361 Pollution Control 24, 2002 Authority Spokane County Fire Yes November Spokane County Yes October Protection District No. 1 12, 2002 Division of Building & 24, 2002 Code Enforcement RESPONSES FROM AGENCIES OF INTEREST: Responses received from agencies of interest are in the forrn of comment and recommended conditions of approval. RESPONSES FROM THE PUBLIC: The Division of Planning received no letters from the general public in response to the Notice of Application or the Notice of Public Hearing for the project. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS: The project site is located within the Heavy Industrial (HI) category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan as implemented on January 15, 2002. . INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES Categories for industrial use include the following. HEAVY INDUSTRY - Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities that may have significant impacts to surrounding areas, including, but not limited to noise, odor or aesthetic impacts. LIGHT INDUSTRY - The Light Industry category is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility. Light Industrial areas are comprised of predominantly industrial uses but may incorporate office and commercial uses that support and complement the industrial area. INDUSTRIAL LAND USE Providing for industrial land is important for the economic health of Spokane County. Industrial businesses help drive the local economy and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the region. Providing an adequate supply of usable land with minimal environmental constraints and infrastructure in place helps ensure that Spokane County will be an attraetive place for industrial CUE-09-02 Staff Report - December 11, 2002 Public Hearing 3 businesses to locate and prosper. (See Chapter 8, Economic Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial business.) Goal UL.14a Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas that create higher- income jobs, provide economic growth and improve the overall tax base of Spokane County. UL.14b Ensure the long term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. Policies UL.14.1 Identify and designate industrial land areas for heavy industry and light industry. UL.14.2 Industrial land designations within the UGA shall be based on criteria established by the Growth Management Steering Committee of Elected Officials (March 15, 1996). UL.14.3 Encourage intensification and revitalization of existing industrial areas. UL.14.4 Consider capital facility expenditures to facilitate the development of lands designated for indust(al uses. UL.14.5 Encourage industries with low energy consumption and industries that recycle resources to locate in Spokane County. UL.14.6 Encourage low-polluting industries to locate in Spokane County. UL.14.7 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. Response: The existing warehouse use and proposed expansion are generally consistent with the general Policies of the Heavy Industrial (HI) category of the Comprehensive Plan. STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR ALL INDUSTRIAL AREAS Goal UL.17 Establish and maintain land use regulations for industrial areas that protect their use into the future and prevent land use conflicts. Policies UL.17.1 Industrial developments within the Urban Growth Area shall provide the following improvements: a) Paved streets b) Adequate parking for employees and business users (parking may be shared or communal) c) Adequate stormwater control, including curbs, gutters and stormwater management facilities d) Public sewer and water supply e) Controlled traffic access to arterials and intersections CUE-09-02 Staff Report - December 11, 2002 Public Hearing 4 . y ResQonse: The existing warehouse use and proposed expansion would be served with all of the utilities (a - e above) except for sanitary sewers. The project site is within the 6-year sewer service area, however, the warehouse use would generate a nominal amount of wastewater which can be accommodated by the existing on-site sewage disposal system. UL.17.2 Access points should be combined and limited in number to allow smooth traffic flow on arterials. Access through residential areas should be avoided. UL.17.3 Standards for setbacks, landscaping and noise barriers shall be developed to mitigate impacts between industrial developments and adjacent land uses. Response: The existing warehouse use and proposed expansion would not impact any residential neighborhoods with either traffic or noise impacts. HEAVY INDUSTRY Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which may have significant impacts to surrounding areas, including, but not lirnited to, noise, odor, or aesthetic impacts. Commercial, residential and, recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry, except for small-scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited. Limiting incompatible uses ensures a competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply, reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Goal UL.15 A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. Policies UL.15.1 Identify and designate land areas for heavy industry. UL.15.2 Areas designated for heavy industry may include a variety of industrial, mining and transportation uses. UL.15.3 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall not be allowed in areas designated for heaYy industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses which serve the industrial area. UL.15.4 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses shall be strictly limited in order to ensure adequate land supply and prevent inflation of land prices. UL.15.5 Interim uses of heavy industrial property such as agriculture, animal raising and training, recreation including off road vehicle parks and miniature golf/driving ranges should be allowed to occupy undeveloped property pending more intensive utilization. UL.15.6 Carefully consider the designation of comprehensive plan categories adjacent to heavy industrial areas to ensure compatibility between uses and limit land use conflicts. Response: The existing warehouse use and proposed expansion are generally consistent with the general Policies of the Heavy Industrial (HI) category of the Comprehensive Plan. CUE-09-02 Staff Report - December 11, 2002 Public Hearing 5 . MINERAL LANDS Mineral land areas are primarily devoted to sand, gravel, rock, or clay production. Related products such as concrete, asphalt and brick are also produced. Agriculture and forestry may be conducted on mineral resource lands but residences are generally limited to caretaker residences associated with mining or related industry. MINERAL LAND DESIGNATION CRITERIA NR.1.7 Mineral Resource Lands of long-term commercial significance should be designated on official maps and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners through a comprehensive planning process. Mining shall be allowed on lands not meeting natural resource designation criteria if environmental protection and compatibility with adjacent land uses is assured. NR.1.8 Mineral Resource Lands of long-term commercial significance should be designated pursuant to the following criteria: a) In Spokane County, the commercially important minerals are sand, gravel, rock or clay. Mineral resource land designations should be made where these minerals are known to exist. The Spokane County Mineral Resource Map should be used as a tool to help identify additional sites to help meet future demand. b) Mineral resource land designations should be located in areas with compatible land uses, such as mining, industry, agriculture, forestry, vacant or large-lot residential (less than 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres). Mitigation of adverse impacts from mining on adjacent property shall be a prime designation criterion. c) Mineral resource land designations should be 20 acres or more in size. d) Mineral land designations should have a minimum deposit size of approximately 500,000 cubic yards for sand, gravel and rock, and approximately 200,000 cubic yards for blend sand. e) Mineral resource land designations shall not occur on lands with wetlands, riparian areas, geological hazard or threatened or endangered species unless impacts can be adequately mitigated. fl Mineral resource land designations shall have adequate access for trucks. Access shall not be through a residential neighborhood. Response: The immediate vicinity of the project site includes a miAure of historical sand and gravel extraction sites as well as long established industrial Uses. This project site would not generally be consistent with the criteria for designation as mineral resource lands. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SUMMARY: The existing watehouse use and proposed expansion are generally consistent with the general Policies of the Heavy Industrial (HI) category of the Comprehensive Plan and somewhat inconsistent with the criteria for designation as mineral resource lands. CONCURRENCY REVIEW: The proposal is exempted from water and sewer concurrency review under the Phase I-Development Regulations-Section IV (F). The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed this project for transportation concurrency and determined that it is exempt under the Phas I-Development Regulations-Section IV (B) (2) (c). ZONING ANALYSIS: The purpose of the MZ zone is to allow for the quarrying, blasting, reduction, processing and mining of minerals or materials in locations that are designated as Industrial, Rural, Semi Rural or Agricultural on the Future Land Use Plan. The intent is to ensure continued CUE-09-02 Staff Report - December 11, 2002 Public Hearing 6 • l . development of natural resources through inclusion of deposits of minerals and materials within this zone reserved for their development and production; to assure that thebest undeveloped mineral and material resources will not be lost forever by developing of the land for other purposes; to allow for the necessary processing to convert such minerals and materials to marketable products; and to assure that mining activities do not detrimentally impact the environment or surrounding land uses. Response: The proposal is generally not consistent with the purpose and intent of the Mining Zone, however, the existing Mining Zone is no longer consistent with the Heavy Industrial (HI) category of the Comprehensive Plan or the historical and planned development of the area for industrial uses. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS: The Nonconforming Use provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code (Section 14.508) require that any expansion of a nonconforming use be approved by the Hearing Examiner through a Conditional Use Permit process. The approval of a Conditional Use Permit is governed by the provisions of Section 14.404.102 of the Spokane County Zoning Code. Response: As conditioned, the proposal generally satisfies the requirements for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The location of the project within a developing industrial area results in a minimal number of restrictions which are necessary to insure compatibility with adjoining land uses, existing and planned. SITE PLAN ANALYSIS: The site plan illustrates an existing warehouse with 3,930 square feet of warehouse space and 450 square feet of office space, with an addition of 3,210 square feet of warehouse space proposed. Access is provided via a single approach to Tshirley Road. Employee parking and truck loading areas are also shown. STAFF SUMMARY: As conditioned by the reviewing agencies, the proposal demonstrates general consistency with the applicable Goals and Policies of the Heavy Industrial (HI) category of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is not consistent with the purpose and intent of the Mining (MZ) Zone when taking into consideration the location criteria and development standards for mineral resource lands. Although the expansion of nonconforming uses is discouraged, the existing warehouse use and proposed expansion are consistent with both existing development in the area and the future development of other sites which currently retain the Mining (MZ) Zone designation. ATTACHMENTS - A. Maps . • Vicinity Map • Site Plan • Comprehensive Plan Map • Zoning Map • Aerial Photograph B. Planning Division Recommended Conditions of Approval C. Agency Comments CUE-09-02 Staff Report -December 11, 2002 Public Headng 7 . ~ ATTACHMENT A MAPS VICINITY MAP SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP EXISTING ZONING MAP - , ~ 2 VicinitY Map ~ 31 3 L 05 I ~ se - ~ 06 ' ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ r ~ _ - - T =.#aw f j~ • 1;~=-- ~ ^ • ~ -s~ 0y L '_„!TY LT7 ~ w 7 I - " ~ ~ . ~ a ~ Bomwin ~ Y~ ~ ppp ; 9 - ~ ~ ,MIf!: 1 tncfi =125t1 ft CmwdeO 7Ot1E/02 1Jfc"t}'mlap 5ite ~JOLI i _ ~ cp ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ,~fi j/}J ~ ~'1.~ . ~ ~ ~ I ry! 1 ~s~y. ~ ~ ~ • 1 . ~ NA ° t- . ~ ..t. ~ f i e k ~ ~r 1 . 1 ~ I k ~ ~ ~-09-02 Comprehensive L,and Use Plan I , ~ - - - - - = : r - + i . _ a_ ~ • ' t_ - • . ' ~ =3 i l AC1~ p ~fr [ .-1 s"l ~1^L.1~Cll~~~~~K ~ ~ - i ,.141 II 1 r - Sca le;1 irK+ - 667 f! (aunded) 10n"2 C.ompr€hensive Land llse Ptan m ~ i Su6f ect ProprerW within arte or maie Aleighborhaod Ascon'o Subject PraperW within UGA. . . . ~ ar: ~ Pm ~ perty wfthirr ASK t t s#t I f t TubJem f'roparW within RSEh., t-t*ff*f Su6jeot PropwW vut:We IVFIl. 8c Satter. ~ ~ CUE-09w~~ Phase I ZUn1ng „IN i , • 'i ~ '1~ 'S ~Y. ~ ~ k ~ ~ '4 ''M1 ~ 1 ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ ` ti \ ~ ~ ~ .~'4 . . '`~•i~~ ~ ~ +;ti, \ ~y °ti. ~ + ~ . ~'q„ . ~ 4. • ' R~''~_`~ .4 .~•.`5•~. ~ , . h.. ~ ~ y t• . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ , . + `a ~y A~,~ ~ ~ 'r~1. 'at ' ~ '.y ~ i 4.~,~°•° tiyry~.. ~ A , a ~•tti . ' N:~ 4 1,. •t„~`~ i,k y,,, { • , ~ t ' S. ~ 4 ~'t 1, ~ 4 . • 'd ~ . , ~'~~'l ~4 i ~ k ~ ~ Y~~ 5*r*~ A ' ~ : ~ I v 1 r - _ , _ ~ 1 . • . 'L WF~ ~ ~ _ . • _ .'t ~ ~P + W. " • b - A ! • 4 iv . .~~1q- ` , • ~ ~ ~ ~ • • , ~1~,~~,,~ y R',, `1'+y~q' >}•v~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ , i~ ~a,,~ . - k - d 4 ki ~ 4. . ~ , • t `r1~y.: ~ •4 n ~ h4 L' ' ~ ~iI~~L - ' ~ . . ~i h,~ ? ~ ~rv 4.• ~ `4l ,~ti'K ~a ~ ~ ? -~l i~:~~~ ~ , ~ ~r~~~ _ ~ .~r ~ ~ • ~ ~ k.y i = t 1j ~~Vi ~ ~ • ; : +s C ' d _6~ u'` ~.,~,,1` ~y~• '~4 t, ` _ tR-i~ Y.6 401 Fig _ - Y~ • _ s ~'4'`.~ _ _ - . .L - ~ ~y, . ~ , ~ ~ . . 45A ~y1 ~ ~ .0.. 4a~~~ ~ ~ - = - _ ~ 4 k, 4~by;.`ax~~,.4 f Y k` . ^ti . ti ~~.•,~..1 •~y~'~~, ~ ~ . . ''y~4~\ 41 = tl ~y_ ~ ~.l~~t NN~~~I . ~ _-~a~^~ ti \ , i y . ~ . i = _ ~~Y . _ ~ J r- _ ♦ ~ ~~~~4~~~~,, _ Z- - ' 1x t 4 y 1~}~ l , ~ ~ 'L'k~ ~ ,`"h4 k ~"4~~ h .Y~ ~ti h~ i - ' , ~ 'J . . ~ _ S yY~~ ~ "•~y•~.• ~ . ,~1~ x " "L "1~~R~~' ' 7 ~ ~`s.~~ } ~ ~ wy `.14 y's ,h'y~ ~ s ~ ' . _ . _ .T . _ _ _ „_Y `'ti~;``',~• 5`~ ~`'ti'~.:~.~,'4 `~,.\`k ' : . - ~t_ _ _ . " . N .~~.a~,' 4~, ~ ' _ _ ' ~ ~ ' _ ti ~ - ,;-E.~ _ -~4. - 111 Scale : 1 IfFcl ~ 667 ft OrxjA~ I OA 610 2 PhdsiC ~ Zodng ~ ar ~ . ' C UE-09-02 Aerial View Spring 2001 ~ - . , . ~ - r s ' ~ i ~ ♦ ~ ,~r s i yT . y •f,' , • 'yF , _ ' '-r".t+':~ ,~L ,r11~~ • i • ~ ;1:, v .r. • • ,F r +y, ~!F5 -4. Y~~ ~ ; • - y , T M.~.-~. ' - ,:I ; . • , ' ~ $ple :1 inch - 200 ft(rouncied) 10ti6102 /lerial Yew . ~ ATTACHMENT B CQNDITIONS OF QPPROVAL ~ ~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FoR C U E-09-02 ii DIVISION OF PLANNING III~~~ SPOMI~ COUUY 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner(s) of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The Conditional Use Permit applies to the following real property: The parcel of property legally described as "That portion of Tract 72 of PLAT N0.3 WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Tract 72; thence along the Easterly right of way of Tschirley Road North 01 005'33" West 150 feet; thence North 89°47' East 225 feet; thence South 67°05'15" East 112.55 feet to a point on the Southerly Ilne of Tract 72342.93 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT the West 10 feet of Tschlrley Road." . 3. The proposal shall comply with the Mining Zone (MZ) zone and all other applicable Chapters of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended. 4. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: "The parcel of property legally described as: "That portion of Tract 72 of PLAT N0.3 WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of said Tract 72; thence along the Easterly right of way of Tschirley Road North 01 °0533" West 150 feet; thence North 89°47' East 225 feet; thence South 67°05'15" East 112.55 feet to a point on the Southerly Ilne of Tract 72342.93 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT the West 10 feet of Tschlrley Road." is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on [ insert date imposing a variety of special development conditions. File Number CUE-09-02 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning." 5. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements. ~ . dO ' . 6. No further expansion of the nonconforming warehouse use or conversion to other industrial uses shall be permitted until the property is reclassified to an appropriate industrial zone designation. Abandonment of the current use for 12 or more consecutive months shall terminate the nonconforming use rights authorized under this Conditional Use Permit. CUE-09-02 Staff Report - December 11, 2002 Public Hearing 9 i Q'iTACHMENT C AGENCY COMMENTS ~rvLvu.z vA.LL.GI ria%n LErt -+44 i'LAivlvlNli lQ]004 40 1 ? . SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE OEPARTMENT Spokvne CountY Fire Dlstrict l 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE, • SPOKANE, WA 49408-3676 •(509) 928-1700 • FAX (509) 892-4125 Mark Grover C~Iet November 12, 2002 James Richardson Department of 8uilding & Planning 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Conditional Use Permit C U E-9-02 Dear Mr. Richardson: The Spokane Vailey Fire Department has no objection to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit for #his proposal. We will have requirements at building permit time. Sincerely, Kevin Miiler Deputy Fire Marshal KM/sz 1 « , , P , . OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER PWK-2 1026 W Broadway Ave (Location) 1116 W Broadway (Mail) ~ Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (5091477-3600 Fax (509) 477-2243 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO: Spokane County Division of Planning FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads ~ DATE: November 5, 2002 RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNT1f PROJECT: WAREHOUSE EXPANSION BROWN & HILL NOV 6 2002 FILE CUE-0009-02 Hearing: @ DIVISION OF PL.ANNI(VG Planner: JAMES RICHARDSON Review Date 10/30/2002 Sponsor/Applicant: BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES Section Township Range: 06-25-45 Tech n ical/Review Date: ( @ ) The Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision " should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Note: The existing head-in parking stalls along Tshirley Road are considered legally non-conforming parking stalls. If the current use of this facility changes from the existing warehouse use, then the non- conforming parking stalls will need to be relocated somewhere else on the site to meet current parking . standards. Current parking standards will not allow any expansion of the existing head-in parking in the future. 2. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 3. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 4. Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system. CC: Applicant BROWN & HZLL PROPERTIES Engineer/Surveyor Planner JAMES RZCHARDSON P~kqe 2 , Enqineers 1 • ~ 10/30/2002 CvE-0009-02 5. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." 6. The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed this project for transportation concurrency and determined that this project is exempt under the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan Phase I- Development Regulations - Section IV (B) (2) (c). END - ' r / po / e County • blic Works, i / o / on Engineering Sectio 1 o • County • • ' • . 1026 Broadway • • 1116 : •.d . • • A • • • . 1 1 1 1' 4 .11 A 1 • • ~ Memo ~ ~ ~ SPOKWCOEy ~ To: Spokane County Division of Planning ~ OCT129r2oV Planner: JAMES RICHARDSON From: Greg Baldwin Subject: CUE-0009-02 (WAREHOUSE EXPANSION BROWN & HILL) Applicant: BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES Date: October 28, 2002 RE: Conditional Use- Review 10/30/2002 - Preliminary Review The appliGant has been requested to submit a revised site plan. This site plan needs to define the existing driveway approaches to Tschirley Road, parking and loading areas, circulation of vehicles within the site and the exact ciimensions of the existing and proposed buildings from Spokane County Road Right-of-Way. After submittal of the revised site plan of record, conditions of approval will be submitted for the record. CC: Applicant . BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES Engineer/Surveyor Planner JAMES RICHARDSON r . ~ . ► ~ ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99260 SPOK,~ (buyTY 509-477-3675 Recommended Conditions File Number: CUE-09-02 The applicant should contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements. Cnmmercfal FootinR k fovndotion Perm[t APreemen102/UB/00 ~ . - ~ , M E M 0 R A N D U M DATE: October 30, 2002 TO: James Richardson, Division of Planning FROM: Lucy Peterschmidt, P.E., Stormwater Utility . RE: CUE-9-02 - Warehouse Addition to Existing Building CC: File We have reviewed -this Conditional Use Permit application and SEPA checklist. Future construction must comply with the drainage requirements of the current edition of the Spokane County Guide/ines for Stormwater Management. For the applicant's information, we have highlighted a few requirements that apply to this proposal: 1. Spokane County does not own or operate a regional stormwater conveyance system. As a result, the project proponent is responsible for providing on-site control of stormwater runoff from newly constructed impervious surfaces. 2. Drainage shall not be diverted and/or released to a downstream property at points not receiving drainage prior to the proposed development. 3. This proposal is located within the Spokane-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). In order to mitigate the potential for groundwater degradation, all stormwater runoff frorn land developed within the ASA shall be treated prior to discharge to a drywell or other approved disposal point. The preferred method of treatment is through a bio-infiltration swale (formerly referred to as a"208" swale or a grassed percolation area). Thank you for the opportunity to comment. . C:1Documents and SetUngsyrichardsanlLocal SettingslTemporary Intemet FilesIOLK151CUE-9-02.doc . y ) ' • ) SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION Inter-office Communication DATE: October 24, 2002 TO: James Richardson, Associate Planner, Spokane County-Planning Division FROM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD SUBJECT: Proposed Conditional Use Permit: CUE-9-02 Brown & Hill Properties 1. References: a) Map of subject, scale 1" = 30', by sponsor, undated, received by this office October 17, 2002. b) Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Quadrangle, Washington and Idaho, Allan B. Griggs, 1966. c) Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. d) Spokane Countv, Washington, Enizineerinp- Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. e) Spokane County Rules and Regulations for Sewage Disposal Systems, January 19, 1995. fl Logs of water wells in Range 45E, Township 25, 26N, Secti(ins 1, 5, 6, 17, and 31. g) Map: Spokane N.E. Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Findings: a) This proj ect lies over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer. b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and within the service area of Consolidated Irrigation District #19. Water supply will be a public system. c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201' Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities, Spokane County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lot is not of ! • I . . the proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system. d) The project lies in a relatively flat area west of Tschirley Road and north of Euclid Avenue. Local drainageways are insignificant. e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service as Garrison gravelly loam with 0% to 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also possible contamination of groundwater. This soil would be classified as a Type IV. fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposits. These geological structures generally yield moderate to very large amounts of water. Data from wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows they are from 146' to 625' deep and have static water levels varying from 40' to 200' below the surface. Average domestic well production is 42.22 gallons per minute. The Consolidated Irrigation District # 19 has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the project upon completion of agreements with the proponent. 3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved: a) A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spokane Regional Health District prior to the issuance of any on-site sewage disposal permit or building permit for this project. b) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. c) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. d) Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. e) Disposal of effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. f) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system may be authorized. g) When the caretaker's mobile home is removed, the existing mobile home will be allowed to be placed in that location. A barrier must be placed around the existing drainfield to prevent vehicular traffic on the sewage disposal system. 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval: a) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County c: Sponsor: Brown & Hill Properties 3420 N. Tschirley 10-24-02 10:23AM FROM-SCAPCA 5094776828 T-481 P.03/04 F-753 r t SPOKANE COUNTY CLEROPAM p AIR POllUT10N Ict P O K A N E CONTROL AUTNOR(TY WEST 1101 GOLLEGE. SUITE 403 • SpOKANE, W4 99201 0 (509) 4774727 Fox (509) 477-6528 Date- October 24, 2002 To: James Richardson. Associate Planner Sookane Countv Division of Planninq 1026 W. Broadway Avenue ~ SQokane. WA 99260 From: Ron Edgar, Chief of Technical Services RE: SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR: File No. CUE-09-02 Proponent / Project Name: Conditional use permit in MZ zone P) 4320 N. Tshirley Rd. ❑ Request for Comments by Oetober 30, 2002 The following is a list of concemslissues that may need to be addressed for this project as determined from informaton received by this office. The list is provided as a brief summary of general requirements and does not relieve the proponent from meeting all local, state, and/or federal regulations. For additional information or clarification, contact SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727. Copies of SCAPCA regulaGons are available for purchase in our office or can be viewed and downloaded firom hnn:1Avww.scanca.0ra. Construction related re4uirements • Dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavation projects must be controlled. This may require the use of water sprays, tarps, sprinKlers, or suspension of activiry during certain weather conditions. • Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. if tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. • Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of ay means other than burning. • SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i.e. ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads, etc.) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions. • If objectionable odors result from this project, effective control apparatus and measures must be taken to reduce odors to a minimum. • Special attention should be given to proper maintenancg of diesel powered constn.iction equipment to reduce the impact of diesei exhaust, a suspected carcinogen. Additional requirements • A Notice of Consuuction and Application for Approval is required to be submitted and approved by SCAPCA prior to the construction, installation, or establishment of an air pollution source. This includes emergency generators rated at 500 hp (375 kW) or higher, natural gas heating equipment units rated at 4 MMBTU/hr or higher (input), and heating equipment units fired with other fuels (e.g. diesel) rated at 1 MMBTU/hr (input) or higher. Contact SCAPCA for a Notice of Construction application. • A Notice of Intent must be submitted to SCAPCA prior to any demolition project ar asbestos project. An asbestos survey must be done by an AHERA accredited building inspector prior to the demolition or renovation of buildings to determine if asbestos-containing material is present at the site. Contact SCAPCA for a Notice of Intent application. L' Tnnf2d on RoGydad papor . v.~'AsePAZErrER,a►L coMnENrs FoRM aoc Paqe 3 Engineers 10/30/2002 CUE-0009-02 Spokane County Public Works Division of Engineering & Roads Certificate of Transportation Concurrency Project Name: WAREHOUSE EXPANSION BROWN & HILL File Number: CUE-0009-02 Parcel Number(s): 06-25-45 Project Address: Specific Land-Use: Conditional Use (CU) - Acres Number of PM Peak Trips Reserved: County Intersections Affected: Expiration Date: The Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads has reviewed the development described above and has determined that sufficient roadway capacity exists, or is programmed to exist with future road improvements on the County road system to accommodate the uses and densities shown. This Certificate of Transportation Concurrency reserves the number of PM peak hour trips indicated above and is issued only for the development as described above. It shall run with the land and is not transferable to other development projects or properties. The Certificate of Transportation Concurrency is valid upon approval of the development permit/application through the expiration date indicated. The owner or owner's authorized agent shall apply to renew/extend the Certificate of Transportation Concurrency prior to the expiration date. Spokane County will not notify a property owner/agent of an expired or impending certificate expiration. Any questions regarding transportation concurrency should be directed to the Transportation Engineering Section at (509) 477-3600. Approval: Division of Engineering & Roads Signature Date BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES Copies to: . ~ S P O K A N E C O U N T Y A DIVISiON iUF THE PUBLlc WORKS DEI'ARTMEM DNISION OF PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Division of Engineering and Roads - Transportation Engineering; Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Division of Engineering and Roads- Development Services; John Hohman Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Ron Hand Spokane County Parks & Recreation, Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer East Valley School District No. 361 Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Consolidated Imgation District No. 19 FROM: James Richardson, Associate Pianner DATE: November 13, 2002 SUBJEGT: Review and comments for the hearing on December 11, 2002 FILE NO: CLTE-9-02 BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming warehouse use in the Mining (MZ) zone. PARCEL NO: 55063.0175 ' APPLICANT: Brown & Hill Properties c/o Ty Brown, 3420 N. Tshirley Rd. Spokane, WA 99206 Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency. Please review and return any comments to me by November 27, 2002 Attachrnents: Notice of Public Heari.ng tiiNL5TOA PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVEIViJE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 11HONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477•2243 • TDI} (509) 477-7133 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS: Application: CUE-9-02; Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming warehouse use in the Mining (MZ) zone. Parcel No: 55063.0175 ~ Hearing Date and Time: December 11, 2002 @ 10:30am , Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Owner/Applicant: Brown & Hill Properties c/o Ty Brovm, 3420 N. Tshirley Rd., Spokane, WA 99206 Location: Generally located east of Flora Road approximately 700 feet north of Euclid Avenue in the SW of Section 6, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM Comprehensive Plan: Heavy Industrial (HI) Ezisting Zoning: Mining Zone (MZ) Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the County Division of Planning as the lead agency on November 26, 2002. The comment period ends December 10, 2002. Related Permits: In order for the project to be developed as proposed, additianal permits must be obtained as required by other local, state and federal agencies. Division of Planning Staff: James Richardson, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7168 HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokaae County Resolution No. 1-0700. All interested persons may testify at ihe public hearing, and may subrrut written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Planning, V Floor Permit Center, Publie Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0220, Attn: James Richardson, File No.CUE-9-02. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245. a 3 a ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER PWK-2 I~I 1026 W Broadway Ave (Location) 1116 W Broadway (Mail) Spokane, WA 99260-0170 05091477-3600 Fax (509) 477-2243 kyhl cowly "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO: Spokane County Division of Planning FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: November 5, 2002 ~a PROJECT: WAREHOUSE EXPANSION BROWN & HILL FILE CUE-0009-02 Hearing: @ Planner: JAMES RICHARDSON Review Date 10/30/2002 SponsorlApplicant: BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES Section Township Range: 06-25-45 Technical/Review Date: ( @ ) The Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision " should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and accepted by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Note: The existing head-in parking stalls along Tshirley Road are considered legally non-conforming parking stalls. If the current use of this facility changes from the existing warehouse use, then the non- conforming parking stalls will need to be relocated somewhere else on the site to meet current parking standards. Current parking standards will not allow any expansion of the existing head-in parking in the future. 2. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 3. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 4. Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system. CC: Applicant BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES Engineer/Surveyor Planner JAiME5 RICHARDSON Page 2 Engineers , 10/30/2002 CUE-0009-02 5. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work." 6. The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed this project for transportation concurrency and determined that this project is exempt under the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan Phase I- Development Regulations - Section IV (B) (2) (c). END . , PAGE 1 14:52:54 28 OCT 2002 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log info.......... 04885 TSCHIRLEY CT (START) .000 CATALDO AV U 19 PAVED 36 TSCHIRLEY CT (END) .090 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36 04840 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) .000 EUCLID AV U 19 PAVED 40 TSCHIRLEY RD .040 DALTON AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40 TSCHIRLEY RD (END) .500 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 4C 04844 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) .000 BTH AV (VACATED) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 TSCHIRLEY RD .120 6TH AV U 19 PAVED 30 .210 5TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 30 .260 4TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 30 .320 3RD AV (END) U 19 PAVED 30 .370 COACH DR (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 .480 SPRAGUE AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 TSCHIRLEY RD (END) .510 SPRAGUE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 20 04846 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) .000 SPR.AGUE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 TSCHIRLEY RD (END) .130 MAIN AV (END) U 19 LZGHT BITUM. 18 04847 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) .000 BALDWIN AV (END) U 19 PAVED 16 TSCHIRLEY RD (END) .040 INDIANA AV (START) U 19 PAVED 16 P ~ I ~ K117'1t7all, Sar"1d]I From: Nyberg, Gary Sent; Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:24 PNl To: BaIdwin, Greg Cc: Hohrnan, John; Kimball, Sandy Subject: CUE-9-02 There ar-e no starmi+vater issues posed by this conditional use permit and no drainage conditions are needed on the staff repart. ~ -t • • a County Public orks, Transp• . • • ' ' g Section, D • • County • • 1026 Broadway • • 1116 • d • • ` • • • . 1 0170 (509) 4 . 1 1 A 1 • • • Memo To: Spokane County Division of Planning Planner: JAMES RICHARDSON 1 ~ . From: Greg Baldwin Subject: CUE-0009-02 (WAREHOUSE EXPANSION BROWN & HILL) Applicant: BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES Date: October 30, 2002 RE: Conditional Use Review 10/30/2002 - Preliminary Review The applicant has been requested to submit a revised site plan. This site plan needs to define the existing driveway approaches to Tschirley Road, parking and loading areas, circulation of vehicles within the site and the exact dimensions of the existing and proposed buildings in relation to Tschirley Road. After submittal of the revised site plan of record, conditions of approval will be submitted for the record. Attached to this memo are finro example site plans for your review. Post-Iti" brand fax transmittal memo 7671 #of pages ►3 ~ To From C IV Gi' C1 LtJJ fJ Co PCC : A liCant BR06dAi & HILL PROPERTIES ~e~~~ Co ~ ~ ~GN~ ~~U~ Engineer/Surveyor Dept. Phone ~ ~ 7-7_ 7 7i~ q ! Planner JAA2ES RICHARDSON ~ Fax # 3Y 7 ~ Fax # q77_ zZq3 J . . , ~ l ' t CUE-09-02 Vicinifiy Map r--- - ~ - - - ~ ~ 31 ~ Eudwd 3 ~ 05 . - - ~ ~ wwoff ~ Os ~ -ES-o---e - =z- F n v~ ~ r==- _r! `:=?Z ~ ■ jl"__-~ I ~ L = 1 ~ ~ C _ ~ • G - ~ r = j 07 C = ~ 4 ='7 ~ - ~ ~ ~t 0 Il J -lodiam ~ Bwwio r-1 Aul Sca{-: 1 iixh - 1250 h(ruuxi-d) 10C16/02 Vinnty Map . . ► S P O K A N E C O U N T Y A DIV15lON oF THE PUBUC WUEtKS UEPARTIviFN'T DIVLSION OF PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Division of Engineering and Roads, Transportation Engineering, Scatt Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Division of Engineering and Roads, Development Services, John Hohman Division of Utilities, Iaformation Services, Jim Red Division of Utilities, Stonnwater Utility, Brenda Sims Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Ron Hand Spokane Regional Health District, Don Copely Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer Spokane County Fire District #1 East Valley School District # 361 Otis Orchards Neighborhood Association FROM: James Richardson, Associate Planner DATE: October 16, 2002 RE: CUE-09-02: Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming warehouse use in the Mining (MZ) zone. - Enclosed find a site plan, vicinity map, environmental checklist, and application for the above referenced Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of a Nonconforming warehouse use in the Mining (MZ) zone. The site is generally located east of Flora Road approximately 700 feet north of Euclid Avenue in the SW of Section 6, T 25 N, R 45 EWM. The site address is 4320 N. Tshirley Road. Please review and forward any comments to me by October 30, 2002. If you have any questions you may contact me at 477-7168. Enclosures copy w/o enclosures: Brown & Hill Properties; 4320 N. Tshirley Rd.; Spokane, VVA 99206 MAILSrOP PWK-1 • 1l lb W. BROADWAY AVENUL• • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 49260-0220 PFiONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (50)) 477-2243 • TDD: (5(l9) 477-7133 IL • , 1 ' , d . . , APPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEA,..NG ITEMS PAGE 2 Of 3 CUP. Varlance. Non-contorminp Usea • Size of the subject property, Parcel No.(s): --5~~-~ • Current zoning of property:,- . • Street address of property (if known): • Legal description of property (include easement, if applicable): ~r-- • Source of legal: ~ • Total. amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: • What interest does applicant hold in the property e-' NOTARY State of Washington) SS County of Spokane ) I swear, under penalty of perjury, that: (1) I am the owner of record or authorized agent for - the proposed site; (2) if not the owner, written permission from owner authorizing my actions on his/her behalf is attached; and (3) all of the above responses and those on supporting ~Are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. - docume t . S~Signed: Date ~6•- ~ ~ ,1II ~ . 0 ~ Notary Public u4i and for t e Sate of Was ington, resi' g at V My appointment expires d B¢ . BuRbF FoRM(§J (by applicant) It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the ~ requested action should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criteria which the Hearing Examiner must consider. Please complete the form and return with your application. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Section Township Range Violation/Enforcement: Y N Lot, legal & add'I. ownership checked by: Person doing preapp conf.: Other/previous Division of Planning actions involving this property: Certificate of Exemption No. Application No. Hearing Date Various site plan dimensions check by ~ , • ~N,,,. • rr ~.q` : i'l~~ ~ ' . ~ :La~~,~ . ` ~ a .~v. .5 i'r . " , • , r . _S = . J±r -~i~.iq ..i .~!'..y ! ~ 'a _i ,i " r ~;yC:.z`~>F';~;~/7V;,~3 I ' ` ~Viyt41; ~ , f ` a'~'•' ~ . . . . " . A r41~At`~ ~'h'"""'""'!"' . ' • : ,i. '"t~',.~ =M:, ' _y - c'~~ ' , - '.,i ~ ~ o ia" i: i~ f f. ~VM t4..'• ~~x„ ~ • 'r' i• , ~fk'"• „H ~ ` ` '~Jy_ ~'•"J •4''y,''• ;'~„"~-~1~~. ~'r1~' S. ~.r', , t.:~, a.° ~ ' A,vrv~•~~iv '~.a., F . , ~ ~ '~Y;. ~1+. ' s th.i : ! ,ri • 'i ' r' 9 j,^"+~ ~ .~~y~.': ~'f F' q~ - „'~Y ~ ~~t.,% . ~ s''/ ".I ' r.i ^s ` , : ~ .xf y;. ' i•~ , ; • ' ~L~•t~-,%,:~yo a : ~ . , y, r ~'s~` _~t . . ~y~~ .S~}5:,~,~~C~,n}.~~:.~L~i'..~~.`N:J`..1,~.t.~'Ak~~\;4.~~~f{•"A}'~'l.~a..a. '~ti' 't`4 a_5,~~ . ' l:'k. t~.F~~~ ~ J~in ..~g i~.: T.+1t;^ FT,°A..~:b,.,e. 1' '~k ~,1y 4`; ~ ~'~h ~ ~ , ~ '•"'~'4'~rt" ^atlY,~.;~ , + « a •tJ ~ ~i ''r~'Y# lI •~f;,~ , •.;i. ^ . u.~ • ~.,,p~,~~ u, . . , ,;;a;<Y»., ,t'._" ~ ~ ~ • ;s,, + st f` ' ,.s y„ '~r~'nT••;,, :'a!'.,• : ~%~n-°. K ~.1+,~"ir J,:` f •r ' ,~r^ ~ » - r,4.:v x ~+e ' '~:'•",~i,~~`~.a'i' , ` t ' , . ; . , y,~:,- 'r,`~`. , ' A . • ~ . . D ~ i~ ~ ''F ' F~. ~ ~9 • ~t~} 1 ~ .X ~r.~ : 4.' ry ~ 1 ' . ~ ~ . '..i "..r^ - k~` °rTa , ~y ' .,f~ 1`' f~a .t.~. ~ ' . " ,Z~• - c - . y= ~ ~'3' " . i"• • _ , ` ,.o<=r~-i ~ • ! • ~'~'i ii,~'~'tir'! DIVISION OF PL.ANNING ~f y, r Y. ' F. • _ . ,''t' ~t.,<.~~ • , _ ' ' .y; '4': • , -..~_a-.,:, M•~. . „ '.ta:.w_:.11ar~"~.ii~ S ,~`~.l K ~..'w , 4 3 r ~ I' ` ~ ` , ~.'~r`,~ t :,ti ✓ d, :y..; ~ `Y "_,.r'w'c~.~3,:sy:..Wt.....'r~.-:' a .•y,+~'..l ~~►~j-~'+, CDLJ~M • INFQRMATtON PERT'Y OWNER PRO G~~/ • ♦ Property Owner(s): . Street Address: Code~~` State Zip citY: _ ~ _ , F~►X. ~ Phone: (Hom (WQrk) e AppLICANTIAGENT INFORMATION, ♦ p,pPlicant/Agent: Street Address: State: Zip Code: ~ FaX: Clty• : (Home) (Work) ; $pp~,~ Phone Indicate approPriate action): sion of a Nonconformin9'bse RECtl1EST AcTtoNS{sl. ~ p Expa~ ~ OCt 9 2Q42 Cvnditional Use Pe~~t a Other (list): cu ffimPuwNG _ ❑ Variance(s) PROJECT lNFORMATION, • Existing use of pCOPeY,ty: Desc rt notina chan4e from `existina use',: • ribe proPo~ed use of the prope Y~ ~ f- P ~ ~ l f a de scribe the variance souQh# in com!~arable terms (i.e., 50 feet from Lication, state the Code standard a es required 65 feet): ~ . v a r i a n c a P c e t e r 1 i n e v r s , - ~ ~ rds? 0 N lication, does praposal meet al1 standa If a conditional use perm+t app • more variances been requested: Y If not, has one or re arding occurred with the Division of Planning 9 . ff home industry, has consultation of build'+n,g for intended use? Y N construction . , . ~ . , , E'NV ~ ~ SPQKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE S E C T I O N 11.10. 2 3 0;1 - , ~ . ...~~i _ spo4vf COU . N7Y , ocr 9 2002 CUR% 'Tp ~NG ~ CUEc=m9--0 'APPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEA,,,NG ITEMS PAGE 3 of 3 CUP. Variance. Non-contonninp Uaes SIGN-OFF BY AGENCIES The applicant must visit each agency whose number is circled below. . 1. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT a. Proposed method of water suppiy AV2~~ 4g;;7-CW ~ b. Proposed method of sewage disposal kC"/~: ~y ~ A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. We request consultation with the Division of Planning: Y N Signature ~ Dat° ,r~ 2. WATER PURVEYOR: Vv- b / c s ~ a. Proposed method of water supply C~Gis.;,7A< . ~ b. The proposa,9s not located within the boundary of our future service area. c. The proposa is is not located within the boundary of our current district. - d. Wcvware not able to serve this site with adequate water. . atisf ctory angemen have ave not been made to serve this proposal. Iol-316 2 Ignature ~ Date 3. SEWAGE DISPOSAL P OR: . a. Proposed met a er supply ~ b. osed method of sewage disposal A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant en informed of requirements and standards. Signature Date 4. FIRE DISTRICT / FIRE MARSHALL a. ProPosed is within Fire Protectton District b. Adequate arrangement have/have not been made to meet our needs in providing for an adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes c. Recommended fire flow: U-ttk ; or unable to calculate now because use is not definitive and will be determined at building permit application time. ~ d. Requirements include: r i ature Fire District # Date App for Publlc Hearing Items-Ig-10-98 . , , . 1 ' • Y SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 ` Spokane EnvironmenLal Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1) PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the envlronmental impacts of a proposal before makin~ decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals w ith probable significant adverse impaccs on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide informacion to help you and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts frorri the proposal, if ic can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTR UCTIOiVS FOR A PPLICAm?S This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to deterrrune whether the environmental impacts or your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the mor precise information known, or give the besL description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or p;oject plans without the need to hire e:cperu. If you really do noL know the answer, or if a question does noc apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complece answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zonin~, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer Lhese question if you can. If you have problems, the governmental acrencies can assisc you. The checklist questions apply to all pans of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional inform-ation chat will help descnbe your proposal or iLS environmental effecu. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional informacion reasonably related to determinincr if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NOIV PROIECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non-projecc proposals, even though questions may be ans-we: ed "does not apply." Lti ApDITIO~, complete the SU-I'PLEyfENTr1L SHIET FOR NON-PROJECT pCTIO\S (par D). For, non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "apolicant," and "propery or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area;" respeccively. Spokane r,nvironr::ental Qrdin::nce Chec!tlist n;,-~ ? of 21 . , . , v FII.E/PROJECT No. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 1 2. Name of applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant and concact person: X, 4. Date checklisL prepared: S. Acency requesting check-list: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing) if applicable): Spokane Enviror~::,ental O:-ainance Checkl;st Psge = o: 21 . ' . A. BACKGROCJND (concinued): 7. a. Do you have any plans for fucure additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. , b. Do you own or have opLions on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, eYplain. ~ O S. List any environmental informacion you know abouL that has been prepared, or wi11 be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you klzow n%hether applications are pendin~ for governmental approvals of ocher proposals directly affecting the propery covered by your proposal% If yes, explain. ,1 J 10. List any goti-e: nmenL approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. r r,J >l/r~~f ~ ,J f ~ t C Spokane Environmer_ca. Ore=^arce C}:ecklisc a;e = oI 21 . ` ~ A. BACKGROUND (concinued): - 11. Give a brief, complece description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certa.in aspecu of your proposal. _ You do not need to repeat those a:nswers on this page. '~j~ • ~ . ~1~~"~° ~J.l~ G~ S~ 3 3OQ 5' . . ~ 12. Location oE the proposal. Give sufficienc information for a person•to understand the precise location of your proposed project, includincy a streec address, if any, and section, cownship and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). I'rovide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topograohic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are noc required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submirted with any perrrut application related to this checklist. /V, L O /oe Gl , . ~ SQ P lC° e:;PlP 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewe: Service Area? The Priority Sewer Seryice Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane Counry's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). PaQe 5 of ) I Spo'Kane F_nvironm e, :aI Ord:~ar ce Checklist ' Evaluation For , Aaency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONYIENTAL ELF.MEiVTS: 1. EARTH a. General descripcion of the sice (circle onfl3t olling, hilly, steep slopes, ' mountainous, other: b. Whac is the sceepest slope on the sice (approximate percent slope)? ~ c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for eYample, clay, sand, gravel, pe-at, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. _ d. Are there surface indicacions or history of unstable soils in the immediate viciriiry? If so, describe. . e. Describe the purpose, type ~nd appro:umace quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. . . f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Spokane E.nvironmen:al Ordinarace Check-11ist Ps~e 6 oE2 t . • ~ . . . ' Evaluation For , Agency Use Only B. ENVIROiV1bIENTAL ELFrti1ENT$ (Continucd): g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? ,-.,4z6 /c, h. Proposed measures co reduce or concrol erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ~>-7 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, indusTrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is compleced? If any, generally describe and give appro~cimate quantities, if luiown. b. Are there anti- off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affecc your proposal? If so, ~enerally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol emissions or other impacts to air, ;f any: Spokane Envirorarnenz1 Ordinar:ce Chec'.zlist P~:`? 7 c.`?l S 1 • 1 l ~ / r Evaluation For AQency Use Only B. EWIROMMENTAL ELEirlEt~tTS (Continued): 3. WATER a. Surface: ' 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity oF the site (including year-round and seasonal stre-ams, saltwacer, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If aopropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any svork over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) Lhe described waters? If ti es, please describe and attach available plans. ~ . i~ 3} Estimate the amoLnt of fill and dredge material that tivould be placed in or removed from su:-face 'wazz: or wetlands and indicate the area of the sice that would be affected. - Indicate the source of fill materi3l. 4) Will the proposa.l require surface wacer withdrawals or diversions? Give a gene; al description, purpose, and appro:cimate quanticies if known. S) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note lo,cation on the site plan. • ~ ~ Spoksne Enviro::menc: ? 0-dir.::nce Checklist Pa;e S o 2 ; . s Evaluation For • Agency Use Oniy B. EWIRONMEMAL ELEib1ENTS (Continued): 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipaced volume of discharge. ~ b. Ground: 1) t'Uill ground~-ater be withdrawn, or will water be dischar~ed to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. ~Z✓ ~ 2) Describe waste macerial that will be discharged into Lhe ground from septic tanks or ocher sanitary waste treatment facilicy. Describe the ~eneral size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. 3} Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includina systems such as those for the disposal of sLOrm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amounc of macenal to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including macerials which may encer the system inadvertently chrou(yh spills or as a result of fire fightin~ actiy icies). . / - ~ Spokane Envi: on~_..-::;31 Or4!':,aincz Checlclist Paoe 9 of 21 ' , . / ~ ' Evaluation For • Agency Use Only B. ELNVIRONivIENTAL ELEiMEYIS (Continued): 4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or pecroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground sLOrage canks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will _ be stored? ~ 5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure thac leaks or spills of any chemicals scored or used on sice will noc be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal sysLems described in 36(2) and 36(3)? ~ . C-0- c. Water Runoff (including sLOrm waLer) 1) Describe the source of runoff (includin~ storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quancities, if known). Where will t!iis water flow? Will this wacer floR- into other waters? If so, describe. ~ A~,~~ ~ . ~ 01,244- ~ 02 ~ r► ~/c~,~~~ Will a-nv chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will~drain to surface or groundwacer or to a storm water disposal system discharcrinc, to surface or groundwater? 3) Could wasce rnaterials enter ground or surface svaters? If so, generally describe. Spokane Environ::,encal Ord;nance Checklist Pa~e 10 ui 21 Evaluation For ' Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONiVIENTr1L ELEMEiNTS (Continued): d. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aouifer SensiEive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Seccions 36(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklisc). 4. PLr1NTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, ocher /evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ✓ shrubs grass pasture crop o r gra.in wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plancs: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be rernoved or altered? /j/ ;ff c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ~ d. Proposed landscaping, use of native planEs, or other measures to przser-ve or enhance vegetation on the sice, if any: u ~ rJC- j't / ~'r S okane Enviro~..,~Jnral O~} P ~:Lilna:ice Chec!:lisl Puge 1 1 0!:2 1 ' ♦ . Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. EINNIR0NN1ENTAL ELEMENTS (Continueci): 5. ANIiVIALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the sice: birds: h-iwk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: . mammals: deer, bear, elk, beave:, oLher: fish: bass, salmon, crout, herring, shellfish, ocher: ~Z~°"A/ 4 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sice. ~ c. Is the site part of a miaration route? If so, erplain. ~fC:~7 ~ d. I'roposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: ' ~ ~ U 6. ENERGY AiND NANRAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy. (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) ~;ill be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whecher it tivill be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. -P ~ / - b. Would your project af:ect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generall-; describe. ' . f~ ~ Spokane Envirorime;,:_j O:~:nance Chec'K-list PaQe 12o; • • 9 • . , • ~ ~ / ' \ 1 D Evaluation For ' Agency Use Only B. ENIVIRONNiENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): ' c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control ene: by impacts, if any: . 7. ENVIRONi'YIENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including eYposure to to"cic chemicals, risk of fire and eYplosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, desc; ibe. / ~ / 1) Describe special emergency services Lhac might be required. ~ - 2) Proposed measures to reduce or concrol environmencal he-alth hazards, if any: b. Noise 1} What types of noise eXist in the area which may affect your project (for e:cample: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? 2) What types a-nd levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-terim, or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicare what hours noise would come from t6e site. Pa~: 13 oi SpokZn? En%-ironr-n--°;? O:C`:-ance Crecklisl ~ ' ~ . ' ~ • i a l f Evaluation Foc . Agency Use Only B. ENI1"VIRONNIE~1T~.L ELEsb1EiNTS (Continued): 3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. LAND AND SHORELNE USE a. Whac is the currenL use of the site and adjacent properties? r , 7, . i ~ ~ 'Woof ~~~~~G►~O~" a~~ f ~a/'~ P~~ ~ c~•~-~~ ~ i~ • ef b.Has the sice been or a~riculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any szructures on the site. ; d. Will any strucLUres be demolished? If so, which? e. Whac is the current zoninc, classification of the site? Spokaae EnL-ironr::enial 0:c_-:ance Checklisz Pa;- 1' e:`? i - ) < < Evaluation For ' Agency Use Qnly B. EiNVIRONiNIENTAL ELLbIEV1'S (Continucd): f. 'What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? - g. If applicable, what is the currenc shoreline master program designaEion of the site? ~ h. Has any part of the sice been classified as an "environmenta.lly sensitive" area? If so, specify. i. Approsimately how rnany people would reside or work in the completed project? ~ . j. flpproximatelv how rnany people R%ould the compleced projecr displace? k. Proposed me3sures to avoid or reduce displacemenc impacts, if any: X'ti ~c.7 . ~~a. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existincr and projectec! land uses and plans, ir any: ~ Spokane Enc-iro;:me:«al Ordi::--tnce Chec,list p~s: 4' 21 . 1 • > > , ~ Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEl"YIENTS (Con(inued): 9. HOUSING a. Appro:cimately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whecher high, middle, or low-income housing. ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ / b. ApproximaLZly how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housinba. ~ c. Proposed messures to reduce or control housing impacu, if any: 14 . f~,~ 10. .'r1ESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; whaL is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 2 ~ -lee ~ b. What views in che immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? f'Y v ~I ..P A - c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesLhetic impacts, if any: Spokane Environt-nznc3! Ord:nance Chectlist Pase l o o; ? 1 1 Evaluation For • Agency Use On1y B. EWIRONMENTAL ELEINIENTS (Continuecl): • 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. Whac type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could lighc or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? - - c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? ,1 . . d. Proposed measures to reduce or control lighc and gla.re impacts, if any: 12. RECF`EATIOIN a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immed.iate vicinity? b. Would the proposed project displace any exiscing recreational uses? If so, describe. Spo'.-:ane Enviror.~::l---ita? Chec;list p1je 17 o: I •I , • • •1 ' ~ ~ 1 1 _j ! / . Evaluation For • Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONIYIEiTr1L ELEMENTS (Continucd): ' c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, includin(z recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: X/' ~ 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATIOiV a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers, known to be on or nen to the site? If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of hiscoric, archaeological, scientific or cultural imoortance known to be on or ne~ct to the site. . . 0 14~ c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serAng the site and describe proposed access t to the existing street sti-stem. Show on site plans, if any. l ~ b. Is site currently sen-ed by public transit? If not, what is the appro:timate c'.istance to the nearesc transit stop? 4C Spokane Environm enta! Ordinar,ce Chec'-disc Paoe 1 S o:' -)1 . Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. EWIRONiNIENTAL ELEib1ENTS (Continued): c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate,) looop _r4 , ~ e ~l~G~ ~ d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvemenLS to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). - e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediaEe vicinity oo water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. 410 f. HoRr many 'vehicular trips per day Nould be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. 4/o m o r ~ g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transport-ation impacts, if any: 1~~Q dI ~ 15. PliBLIC SERV`ICES a. Would the pro)zcc result in an increased need for public se;~"ices (for esarnple: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, ocher)? If so, generally describe. Spokane EnE•ironrnzn:al 0r.-I:::ance Checklist Pa,e 19 0► ? I • , ti ~ ,i ~ , Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELFaN1ENTS (Continued): b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direcc impacts on public services, if any. ~ 16. UTILITIES a. Ci le utilities currently available at t te eleczriciry nacural gas ater, efus sen%ice t ephon sanitary sewer, septic syste , er. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. r.'cr~4,1 . / C. SIGNATURE I, the undersioned, swear under the penalry of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my parc, the aczencv may wirhdraw any decermination of non-significance that it might issue in reliance u~on this checklist. ' Date: ~ Proponent: Qf'Ovh ~ //:P// Proponent: (Please type or print) ~ natur.e) Address: X W.20 7S City, State, Zip: -47 Phone: / ~ 2 73 Ci I~ Person completinj the form: I ✓ /4~ Date: ~ - ~ . , . Phone: Spokane Em•ironme^ ~31 Ordi:.ance Chec';list P1Je 20 0: ~ . c , ~1 ~ t r FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: . Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance (DNS). B. Concludes that probable sianificanL adverse environmeni31 impacts do eYist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated decermination of nonsignificance with condiLions (VIDiVS). C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determinacion of significance (DS). REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE Spokane Environme~ ta.l 0rdinance Chec4clis; Pa-0e of 21 . ~ / ~ 1 1 <4r= ` ! ~ SPOKANE COUNTYDivVISIONOF BUILDING AND CODEENFORCEMENT ~ I026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050 ~ sPOMM C'tm ~ Site Information Project Information Site Address: 3420 N TSCHIRLEY RD #1 Project Number: 02008369 Inv: 2 Issue Date: 10/9/02 SPOKANE, WA 99216-1755 Permit Use: CLTE-9-02 CUP FOR EXPANDING NC BUILDING Parcel Number: 55063.0175 Subdivision: WEST FARMS IfUtIGATION TR.PLAT-# Applicant: BROWN, TY Block: Lot: ' 3420 N TSCHIRLEY ROAD, S[JITE ] Zoning: M-Z Mining (M-Z) SPOKANE, WA 99216 Phone: (509) 928-5608 - Ocvner: BROWN & HII.L PROPERTIES Contact: BROWN, TY 3420 N TSCHIRLEY ROAD, SUITE 1 Address: 3420 N TSCIURLEY RD SPOKANE, WA 99216 Phone: (509) 928-5608 SPOKANE, WA 99216-1755 • Setbacks - Front: Left: Right: ReAr: Building Inspector: LEONARD FLiJNO . WaterDist: CONSOLIDATED IRRG #1 Group Name: - Project Name: - 7 ' Permits , Conditlonal Use Contractor: License ENGINEER REVIEW $50.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW $75.00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT $448.00 Tots►1 Permit Fee: $573.00 . Payment Summary , Total Fees AmountPaid AmountOwing Tran Date Reeei t~# Pavment Amt $573.00 $573.00 $0.00 10/9/02 7951 $573.00 f S Processed By: Ramey, Kathleen PERMIT Printed By: WENDEL, GLORIA Page 1 of 1 K L 1 N 0 TI#;; E ~ It is the responsibility of the applicanUpermittee, not Spokane Counry, to see to it that the use described on the front of this permit complies with applicable codes and requirements and that required inspections are requested. Failure to request required inspections and obtain the necessary approvals prior to progressing beyond the point where inspections are required may necessitate removal of certain parts of the construction at the applicant's/permittes's or property ownees expense. At a minimum, the following inspections ARE REQUIRED by County Code: 1. FOOTING - when forms and reinforcement are in place and prior to placement of concrete-all structures, including manufactured homes. NOTE: This inspection includes review of the structure's setbacks from property Ilnes. Minimum setbacks are established by County zoning regulations. Typically, side and rear yard setbacks are measured from property lines, while setbacks for yards abutting streets are measured from the property line or the center line of the roadway right-of-way, whichever provides the greater setback from the center line of the roadway right-of- way. Curb lines and fence lines are not necessarily indicative of property lines. In some residential areas, the County can own as much as 20 feet of right-of-way between your property and the actual improved streeUcurb. The responsibility to comply with applicable setback provisions lies solely with the permittee-neither Spokane County nor its authorized representatives assume any responsibility for the verification or location of your property lines. Please verify their location prior to locating your structure. Failure to properly locate the structure may require its relocation at the owner'slpermittee's expense. 2. FOUNDATION - when forms and reinforcement are in place and prior to placement of concrete. 3. FRAMING - after all framing, bracing and blocking is in place, and prior to concealing. 4. INSULATION - prior to the installation of drywall. S. PLUMBING - after rough-in, before covering, and final. 6. MECHANICAL - rough-in of piping, before covering, metal chimneys before concealment, and -final. 7. FINAL - when complete and prior to occupancy and/or use. Please provide 24 hours notice. gJj permits requfre ftnal inspection. NOTE: In addition to inspection of the structure, this inspection includes review ot slte improvements (rypically depicted on the approved site plan) required by ordinance or as a condition of approval of this permit. Items such as the installation of fire hydrants, fire department access, on-slte drafnage ("208 swales"), road tmprovements, parking, and landscaping are common requirements of a permiVsite plan which must be com- pleted prior to final approval of a building or issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 8. MANUFACTURED HOMES - Final inspection required when complete, stairs, handrails, skirting, etc. installed, and prior to occupancy; completed inspection record card must be available on site. 9. SEWERS - prior to cover 10. RIGHT-OF-WAY/APPROACH - prior to placement of concrete, or, if gravel approach, after completion. In addition to the above, any plumbing or mechanical systems or material which would be concealed by framing, drywall, concrete, etc., must be inspected prior to cover. Check with the department for "special inspections" in conjunction with commercial projects. FOR INSPECTIONS: TO INSURE PROMPT SERVICE, PLEASE GIVE ONE WORKING DAY/24 HOUR NOTICE . PARTS OF YOUR PROJECT MAY REQUIRE PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS FROM MORE THAN ONE AGENCY. • Building, plumbing, mechanical and fire inspections, Division • Road cuts for utilities or driveways, Division of Engineering & of Building and Code Enforcement Roads - 48-1-16UR NOTICE REQUIRED 477-3675 477-3600 or State Department of Transportation • Construction in a flood plain, Division of Engineering & Roads 456-3000 . ° . 477-3600 • • Sewer connection, Division of Utilities • Electdcal wiring, State Department of Labor and Industries 477-3604 324-2640 or City Public Worics Department 625-6300 • On-site waste disposal system, Spokane Regional Health District 324-1560 • PERMIT EXPIRATION AND REFUNDS Unless othervvise noted, this permit will be considered null and void by limitation if the work authorized by the permit is not commenced or is stopped for a period of 180 days, unless a written request for an extension of the permit is received and approved by the Building Official prior to expiration. At a minimum an inspection should be requested at least once every 180 days to assure the validity of the permit. A permit may be renewed within one year of the date of expiration for one-half the original fee, subject to certain limitations-please call us if you have any questions. All refund requests must be made in writing by the applicanUpermittee (shown on the reverse) no later tfian 180 days after the date ot fee payment. Refunds of not more than 80% of the permit fee paid may be authorized when no work has been done under the permit. No refunds may be authorized more than 180 days aher fee payment. : MISTAKE? If you think we've made an error in processing this permit or in conducting inspections pertaining to it, or find erroneous information in the permit, please bring it to our attention immediately by filing a written request for correction within 10 working days of discovery. All such requests should be directed to the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the below address. Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement ' 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 . ' Phone: (509) 477-3675 I'ax: (509) 477-4703 TDD: (509) 477-7133 . ~ • % .a Spokane County Public Works Department Division of Building & Code Enforcement Receipt Receipt Number: 7951 Customer Number Projects - Full Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt , Inv Anrt . Owing PAID Pmt . 02008369 2 $b73.00 , $573.0V $573:'00~ , $573.00 EZ Total: $573~.00 $573.00 ~ 4573:00' - $573.00 Miscellaneous Items Total PAID: $573.00 Tender ~e Check A6ct - Balance CC Nbr -E~cp'Date. TENDERED C.heckl _ = 3001 573.00 Payer: BROWN,- TY - - - - - - - . . Total TENDERED: 573.00 _ Over / (Short) $0:00 Change $0.00 Notes: Tran Date/Time: 10/9/02 12:28:33 PM By: KCumming Logoi: User: gwendel Station: GWENDEL Override By: ; Printed: 101910212:28:34 PM Page 1 of I , S ~ CUE,09-02 . V lelli,4ty ~ ~ 31 ~ ~sdand , a Il _ ~ 05 yv*w - ~ Lonoaww s` w~ . • 06 ~ v . ~ G=? C ~~i ~ i-~ • ~ = 3 f: ~ , ox Shn .r-: > • ' ~ • 1 ' W' ' 1 ~ d gg1 W in • ~ A ia -e - :1 PA~p ` 3 tpJ16/02 Vicxr~tl' ~ye ;1 f(~'► " 1250 ft Gro~ . f 1 Parr.el: 55063.0175 Owner: BROWN & HILL PROPERTIES LLC CaOwner: Owner Address ' 3420 N TSCHIRLEY ST SPOKANE WA 99216 Site Address 3420 N TSCHIRLEY RD SPOKANE ~ Legal Description ~ W FARMS IRR TR PL3 PTN TR72 DAF; BE6 AT SW COR OF SD / - TR 72 I I' I TH N150FT TH E225.FT TH S67DEG 05MIN 15SDS E112.55FT TO PT / ON SLY LN OF TR72 TH S71DEG 49MIN 05SDS W ALG SLY LN OF ' TR72 342.93FT TO POB EXC W20FT FOR TSCHIRLEY ~ RD DaltIba-__--- , y / / Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtainetl nom the appropriate agency. ~ ~•i N~ r , I 01 Z L' 4 J 0 ' . , a I ' . ' ~ 63 ~ S 0 So 120rc ~ i~ . OL 1 aw~ ~ ~Z I b6 Q l ~ I i +I .»Y` e i' 1 6~ Z ~y i ~o ,Il p. , ID 1 -1 r A•~~ h ~ ~ , V.09~. pI.AT ` D ~~11~~/•~ 4 0 . ^T ~ , ~ { ~ I R R ~ ~ , _ Se~~~~~O~F ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ " Fs i ° ~ S~ 4-I a~~~ :~6`tt~~jh`!y`• ~ 1 ~~y`' +J n~ i~~ y~! .'.~1,.~._._..~'' , I „ " ' 4 ~ n ~ ~ ,S► ~ Qy I~ ~ / ~~{'`~•'('f « 73 , f : • t,' ♦ ~ I •,~~;'1'~ ;~l Y i:~ ~ q i I~ + ~ ~ M I 7 ` 2 1 C~' ~ r ' q & 'cvq `~;•y ~ ~ ~ / ~ r~ ~ ~ g • a 11 .o ~ i 1 ; ~ ~ U " ~ ~~ii / ~ ~ ~ ' m w~}M • ~ ► ~tf ~ 7 ~i ea i; , a r' a W, ~ ~ s ~ i '2 CC 8S 1 I ~ • ,~,.~ea'O ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 L~Gd . ' e 93 t y ~ 0 . ~ • qA i B6 3p , ~ q.. 4 AA~'fON le°l-- _ . ' N. [yq•a~'W 2 ~ 201't+ I ~ 4 op a L.P• ,Cot• ♦ ~ ~ ZO 6~ f scir. ~ r~r8$~u Ii 90 7 ; ,r Y u I I~~v~..vt A~~(s Gw~~ ~~n UK ` ~ i.Y S2 •'~f ( 'a^ s/•+ ~ ~rfr , N M ~ • . M » - • sa T~ w ieFY ~ NN~~ n i~M N.f.r. N.rlr. ~ rFlwr r ~ Q ~ n • t ` n n , ' a-`~ w . ~~M.~~,•~~}'~1- ~r..ai. . .r. ~SY.~_I)i2~'__~~_A/,_:. ~ Pf ~ ~ • I ~ . ~ _ „ 1 - , ~ • - . .ss. ; S¢ . ~I . t y _ - _ . _ , -P • - • - • - • - . 56-. !L ' ...o- I ~0, 'a~~~ w; ~ ~s,.`i`~ . - • • ~ ~ ,s'9 o S8 : } • - ! ~ o . 3 . ~ I 9 • , 3 N y rU'' ' ~ I_ . / y ~r.r., . • , . Na0'4W ~ 1IJO1'- ~ _ . . . , . - . L • _ . . ~ ' 6.~ . ~ ~~roYf,n ~Y ~r .veov~w I S 60 6/ ; 62 ' ~ I 67 66 fa . ~ . N~A r 0 • 70 6e ' e . ~ ; ~ e,,,~'l • ' we ~'ron A , • - J , ^,b i . ~ e• ;~o~ti.~ 7/ ' w 74 . ,r ~,r * . . . , 7s . • C , 21 73 72 ~ t N,~"' ~~7j • ,o~ ~ A•d 8s rr ~ x• a'• j ! ~ 2 Bl X 80 B , . . . es . ~Y • ~87 ~ 83 - A, . , . . _ . . ~ • , t' . ~ . r i' ' . • . . ~ ' . ~ ~ ,~,;F't• • ~ ` • . ' ' ' r' ' 7`9 - • S ' • Y ~ g - ' - : . ; . , . , ' . : . ~ ~.'re , I• . a~ : . '~~re.ri • k 114 ..w .~f1s' i;. . ~ ~ ' • _ - y-,93• : r ,'`r• . J »Iw'G~ •...~1 ~ ~ . ' 1. .c t-- ~ `~Yilw:.~fn_ .6r.. ' ~ece~ . • ~~~o • - p YB7I7N.'0211' f~• 4fC~~ • • . ~i~. ~ -90 ~ _ 5/' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~~N • . .IJ011' • ~ . . 1 >Hi . . . . '~NC~w• _ . • 92. 93~~~•*° _ . . .9,~'~" ' • ° . • . • 'i•: ~ . . ' F' ',~~t~1 c:.i: . , ' . f • J i~rti~ ' ~ • ' •.r , . 1 ~•v . , ' .'..,-I ' r• t • ~ '1 /~I . S ' ' I • f` ^''v'y . n ^'snab •r; . , ' ~ st~- ~;~'Si i : i r~.na' v ~/.•c'. . .~le:'nlq. - . ^ . . 9/ . ~ . " _ - , ~ i . . X . ~r. • . ~ _ . . •f , , ' 4i _ _ , ^ ~ . t , - .p , ' 9S. • ~n; ' ; , - • . ~ . ~ ,~r'; . . i _ , . :.J, . : - - : i . . _ " • : 98 L . . • ' ' -Tp. g; " ;;✓,'w: " ~ _ •L ~ _ aaa • . i - . , - , . ~ ~ ~ . . . A' ~.4 .I. ~ ..L~ ' Z ~ ~ : • . 4 ' . ~ ' ..'/001, , v . ' ~y~ : . ~ . . t. ~ 1 ~ h. . a''' _ - - . • a_' r' 7 Y` , '99.c. .i~;"e. i_ , ~ , ` _96 : „ • • ~ ~u . ~f •1. :V i • ~ ' ~ t ~ . ~ ~r • Q • ~...~.~0; l' • ~ i . 7 . ~ , i ~ . • • . . . ,f. •~i ~ ~ . . .•l' PL AT N0. 3 OF " . . nHr~j; a /02 ~ °r i WEST FqRMS 1Rp16A7E0 TRACTS ' J[RLE 1'.400 97 i . r ✓RN. l9ll. . . . ~ ` , ,~"^„•n~~'~'~y~' DEO/CAT/ON . - - • : - NNaw Rtt IrrN er n.cm ~wraGvrs " •~ti • Iha k~.vM's U~t~[~ /~Fn~ Cov~s~ o ~ .rnlw~ 5ee ~ \ Ib~r b 6e Ane~.n 'Pt.1r bw u/land p/elkd /An ,luid. .An,,, un Poatro p/l~ir na J w Mrer vtR+.a rama~rra rn.rers.. ond e oGca h<r.ba d.dcoJc H~h. ~ M y yr, e aho»n Asrun~ ~!e /nrd ~ Jed .n lia+a ~ab1 bnng du<nbed . luf6~i 7 a R~ ~ e(2J TM~ !!I vnd Fne /S/ ond !/K ,fctJhio3l Gk~or/er of/Ft •v /Are~} p~wler f.i[7 Mhr/~ ond/ JoylAw Craerkr o{i/M Nor/Aeor/ (!W}, N!%) onJ 1!r eourhroal9o_46r ol/M Joofhto~/ Owr/~~lJ«1 1 h end e// elLe/a Jia !61 inal Saren (7) e~drr~, e.,I~i~ o/'I/~ JuulAn,P~F q~ar(t• 3/~%) .nd 3 !a~lh~oif Qvorh~ (w~d[y~l olSae/ron Ji.fEJ Me lvK1Na/! efltie ' ~ PorI [eh One (/1, -o f21 7Arce (L cnd /bur /6) arx! ..N.. ~ ~ ~ ~ l~ I 4 ~ ' . - . - -~.rr_,f_i _ - . _ _ T ~ ~ . i a • i .T~.~ I, ~l - . ~ . . . - _ _ - . _ _ _ . - . , ~ j ~ . . . . - • - { - . ~ - .4~n r . ..z , - ~ - '.b.. l ' ~ i~, •~~'iSa2';..~«t. - . - ` ' _ ;'i-~ C . . *1 2 . . _ _ _ - ":,.~t_ ' ' • . k _ al"m . . - n 1 ~?r~. ~ - _ . _ ..i f r _ 4. _ y, ~ , 'i.~ ~►afy"~:5~.. ! R~.'f ~ yp~/l e* . - , . . . ,~s ~ M~ ' '-7 ; ~ T ~ ~e. ~ . , . • ~ ° ~,r ~ ~„r ~ r' ~ `I In - ~E jd . _ - ~►p ~ ~ ~ . ; .~r P^ ~ , , a _ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ . - . 1 ~ - ! ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~l - , : _ X ~ ' ~ = t 1~h ~ ^ ~S ~•'a~ _ ' ~ y ~ E!, ~ } . ~ ~ ~ ' ~i G•"A1-+~ ~ ~ S ` ~ ' ~ n~ d~, • `k`~ ~ • 4. *~`_~r ~~+F~ 7~~ ~ ~k • e ~ C~~r.r ` ~.~j ~ x` ~ - 40. r • i 'i~i~•,~- ~ ~ , a ~ 4~ . ' ~ ~ F _ ' s fi+~ ~ " . . ~ f ~ ~ ~ 4. 4it 1^Y ~1•t; f 1~}~~~ . - ~ ~ .3; ~ ~a' ~ ~ . ~ - ~ . ~++if ' . r ~ _r•,~,. Cf,~,... ~ ~ ~ : . ~ , • ~ ' ~ ; a T ~'r "ti ~ ~ • % ~ r ~ q ~ c ~ Y ! ~ 1 I ti `'1• . . ■ ' ' ~ ~ - - - it . . ~ .a k ~F; . ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ I' . r , ol , . ~ . ~ ,r W ~ i ~ , ~ + ! a F . ~ y yl~• ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ Y , ~ • b,'~I~ ~ x~ ~"+Yd T~_~r~' " - . ; ~ ' . - . ~ . _ ' ~ . ~ • w _ 'yF s~ ~ ' ~ . , . , „ . 7*f' s 4 _ . . , w Y ir • - t loOF ' SG /s/r/~r • ~ . ~ - ~ . / 5 ~ . ~ / . • r'-G`,:-~ r°.~`" 7. . * ~~a,~~• / ~ .2 o F . '000001%.#/ 00001, , - .:7-- n ~'~il.~ -S - - - - - - - ~ 1 '7' .~~f , T f ~ ~/~d-Gr'~/~ \ • ' ~ ~ . . . - . . ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ N ~ ~ 0 . . 14% . , ~ . W ' . ~ ~ . ~ . • . , \ i~ . ~ ' ~ _ . . ~ . . i . , . • ' ` ' • E _ .::xr'~~.. t,^• ;''.1:. • • , . ; . . j . • ~ a.s . ~ 4j ~ • ' ~ C/~ Q ~ ~ ~a7P , ~ ' ~ 7 tr 2 ~ / . ~'r1Z`~ ~ ~GHIr g, • ~'o-fs~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .7t~ - ~ . . ~ / 3 '~'r~'° ~ /r 4~s•r~y • . Z9.r;?PSG -7 9 ~ ~ ~ ~~r, ~ ~ ~ ~~0'►{~~ ~~Y ~ aC~ JAtm QL~~'.►~~ ~ ~ ' /~7~ s ~ ~ ~i.~-~✓~ . . f / • : E~9-02 ~ . . • - X i~ ~~f . /a • . • 9 ~sr ~~'--►~~c ~ G - . . ~S ~GG vs r /~-~cr~' ~~Ty j /~i vs` ~ . , ~~s/I ~ ~ ~ -s~ i~ ' - NOV-61-02 FRI 09-57 AM A 5099253474 P_01 3424 N. Tschiriey Rd. Sutte #1 Spokane, WA. 99216 i s : Hil L~hcne; (sog) 926-2433 FpX: (509) 926-3474 Properties., FM To: Greg 8eldwin From: Dan Hiit Fax: 477-2243 pa9es: 2 Phons: Aafie: 11/1/02 Re: Revised Siie Plan ItUE-000q-D~- CC: Cl Urgent C] For itevlew Cl Plessse Con+rne»t D Ptease Ropfy ❑ Pleaso Rercycie Grefl, Hcro is the Revised Sile Plan you were waiting for. If you have any questions please feel free to cail. Thank you 5099~~'°~" , 5b AM A ~ s_02 THU DE C e At • / ~ ~ r'„ - ~ w , . . . _ . • • ~ ; +T ~re.~~... , f ✓~I"' ♦Ar •l:u:.~.~. " ~ ~ ~~.....y.a~~ ~ 0 ~ .+.e ~ ~ ....~-....Y.. .r ~ « w + . u.~ . , . J . • ~ i~~, ~ ` 3 ' . t ~ f 0- t ~ 1~~ ► ~ T• ~ i r Y 1 ~ . ~ • ~t ' ~ ~ R P'' V " ~j► ~ ~ , ~ ~ K'°' 'I ~~I~!r?t~'lj.~~, .~•.~~A-.. ~ y ~ ~t . . ~ ` r , _ ~~'1 `~~~~t~~ ~ ~ ~ r. ~ ~ ~ ' . ` ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ P • ~ r~ ya,». " t ~ , i ~ ` ~ ~ i ' 3``~• ,'E'' 1 . ' ~ ~ h r • 1\ f~ \ , ~ ~ , ~ ~l 1 • ~ ~ ~ r K ~ ~ ; i V f J , . - ~ ~ • , i f ' 1 ~ t ' , , . ~ r ~ ^ . ~ ` " ' ' .P f ~`a► i~d ~ ~ ~ ~ , 5099283474. , RI 09:5g AM A -01-02 F NOV ~ i 3 ....w t' ~ f'~ • 10, • 1 ' • ~ ~ ~ ~ ' .,~tti ~ 1 ~ ~ v2 r ` ! • ~ ~ r ' _~f~a , • f • / ~ ~ ~ f ~ ' ` ~ ' ~ ~ ` ' C • A 1 f ~ • tl~ l • ~ . ~ L ~ ~ ~ i '1 . . . .._-d.~ ~ ? . ~ . ~ V ~ ; t,,.~ ~ 1f ~ JI, i ~ iu 1 , ! . ~ . ; . ; .-f - ..'.._..~-.-`--~~~.r..~J ~ ^ ~ DEC-,05-02 THU 10:55 AM A 5099283474 P_01 . " ~ ♦ r A. 3420 N. 7schirley Rd, Suite #1 5pohane, WA. 99216 Brown ; Hil Phone: (SU9) 926-2243 Fax: (509) 928-3474 Properties., L.LC To: From: Fax= / Pagea: Phorte: pate; Re' CC: C] Urgetrt t7 For Review Cl Pfease Cor,nmQnt ❑ Pleaae Pteply ❑ Please Reaycle . ~ 1-1000 i.-•• ' ~ . , 1 70 ...~~j~r~ [5o!`. ...~~i.0'"`°i ~~-G J ~~•ihC "00 C~ / c 00r C~ ~~i ' Jr'~? !~''1 4' ~~tl,, • ,r'"~ / ~ I Y ~