VE-75-86
~ ► • ♦ ~
ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUHTY, aASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A YARIANCE FROM THE )
REQUIREMENT OF FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC STREET. ~ FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS
(VE-75-86); JAMES TNIEL ) AND DECISION
SUNMARY OF APPLICATION:
Although the applicant's lot is located within an approved subdivision, its
nearest location to a public street is greater than the ordinary 6 to 7 feet
one woul d expect and hence was judged by the Zoni ng Admi ni strator to not have
adequate frontage on a public street. Additionally, a portion of the lot
which may be most likely considered to have access on the public street is
only 55 feet i n 1 ength. Secti on 4. 05. 040 of the Spokane County Zoni ng
Ordinance requires 65 feet of continuous frontage on a public street.
Authority to consider and grant such a request exists pursuant to Sections
4.03.020 64, and 4.25,030 b, of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
LOCATION:
Located at the northwest end of the fntersection of 5th Avenue and Raymond
Road in the Spokane Yalley, in the northeast 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25,
Range 44. The Assessors Parcel # is 20541-1215.
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADJUSTOR:
8ased upon the evidence presented and circumstances associated with the
project proposal, the Zoning Adjustor APPRDYES the variance conditioned as
stipulated below.
PUBLIC HEARING:
After exami ni ng al l avai 1 abl e i nformati on on f i 1 e wi th the appl i cati on and •
vi si ti ng the subject property and surroundi ng area, the Zoni ng Adj ustor
conducted a public hearing on J uly 9, 1986,,~ondered a verbal decision on July
99 1986, and a written decision on July 1986.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposal is located at the northwest corner of the intersection
of 5th Avenue and Raymond Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 20, Township
25, Range 44 and fs further described as Assessors Parcel #20541-1215, being
more completely described in Zoning Ad3ustor File YE-75-86 and Subdivison File
PE-268, Karle's Subdivision.
2. The subdivided property has limited access to the public right-of-way
due to the right-of-way configuration at the southeast corner of the lot.
However, the amount of frontage is estimated at 55 feet as opposed to the
required 65 feet. Additionally, the actual property is approximately 60 feet
from the curb. These two factors caused the Zoning Administrator to make a
judgement that the lot did not have the required frontage (55 feet versus 65
feet in the agricultural Suburban zone) on a public street. A public street
is defined as being established, improved and maintained and in that respect
the property is 60 feet from a public street, whereas the rest of the lots in
the subdivision and almost all subdivided lots are within 5 to 10 feet of an
improveG street. As a result of the definitions it was the determination that
the lot suffered from lack of frontage on a public street and hence needed a
variance from the requirement for 65 feet of frontage on a public street.
3. The lots to the south (lot 8) and the east (lot 6) have been
developed for some time. The owners of these lots have made improvements to
as if the lots were rectangular and as if there was little or no right-of-way
or right-of-passage into the landlocked parcel between them. The owners of
these lots expressed concern that when access is gained to Lot 7, the subject
property, the improvements and the landscaping may be damaged.
• . . .
yFINDIMGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FILE YE-75-86 PAGE 2
4, As a result of discussion involving a representative from the County
Engineer's Office, the following understandings were reached with regard to
the unimproved and non-maintained portion of the right-of-way:
a. Any improvements made by a ci ti zen wi thi n a ri ght-of-way are
a1 wa4ys subject to removal by the government enti ty and the 1 and
on which those improvements sit is subject to use by members of
the public, as long as they do so Nith all the appropriate
pertinits and approvals which may be necessary from the government
entity which has jurisdiction over the right-of-way.
b. Local government has no responsibllitjr to survey the right-
of-way; such is the responsibility of the private ad3oining land-
owners.
c. The appl i cant, i f granted the vari ance may uti 1 i ze any porti on
of the right-of-Nay leading to his property, Lot 7. This would
i ncl ude uti 1 izi ng those porti ons of the ri ght-of-way which have
been improved by the owners of Lot 6 and Lot 8. If the owners
of Lot 6 and Lot 8 wi sh to ensure that the or+mer of Lot 7 i s not
trespassi ng on thei r property as i t adjoi ns the ri ght-of-waUr,
they would be responsible for a survey to locate the property
line in question. The best advice to the appllcant to avoid arw
conflict and the need to survey, was for him to conservatively
locate the access to his property in the right-of-way so that it
does not cause there to be a question of trespass on the
adjacent Lots 6 and 8.
d. It Nas pointed out that a curb cut exists on the more south-
westerly portion of the curb in the right-of-way area in
question. The applicant would prefer to have a curb cut farther
to the northeast. The County Engineer's Office stated that any
reconstruction of the curb would require an approach/access
permft from thefr office. In response to a question about
whether they would also survey to see that the curb cut was in
the right location, the response was that they would not because
of the usual 6 to 8 feet of difference between the curb and a,
private property. The representative continued that the
granting of an approach/access permit is not a grant of any
ri ght-of-way trespass on any adjoi ni ng pri vate property.
5. In response to a question of whether a manufactured hame Nou1d be
allawed to locate on this lot, the Zoning Adjustor clarified that a double-
wide manufactured home is permitted outrfight in the Agricultural Suburban
zone. The Zoning Adjustor did, horrever, point out that the plat dedtcation
contains the following language, aAll dwellings shall be of new construction
and no buildings shall be moved onto any lot." The question of whether or not
this rras 1 anguage enforceabl e by the County, that i s to say, 1 anguage whi ch
over-rides the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, was referred to the Sub-
divi sion Admi ni strator for an i nterpretation i f any member of the publ ic
wished to raise the issue. It was explained that any interpretation the
Subdivision Administrator makes in this regard is administratively appealable
to an appeal body without the need to take the issue to Superior Court.
Superior Court would be available as an appeal route after a11 adminlstrative
appeals are exhausted Mithin the Spokane Countjr structure.
6. The adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan designates the area of
the proposal as URBAN and the proposal is consistent with the County's entire
Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Plan.
7. The slte is zoned Agricultural Suburban, which would allow the pro-
posed use upon approval of this application.
8. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal lnclude
residential development of similar or slightly denser development, all of
which are compatible with the proposal.
9. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCM
pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b}.
Y ~
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FILE VE-75-86 PAGE 3
10. The applicant has been made aware of the reconmendations of various
CountylState agencies reviewi ng thi s project and has i ndicated he can comply
with those recommendations.
11. The proposed site plan indicates that setbacks, parking, height of
the structure(s) will conform to the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
12. The proper 1 egal requi rements for adverti si ng of the heari ng before
the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met.
13. Any concl usion hereinafter stated which may be deemed a fi ndi ng
herein 1s hereby adopted as such.
From the Findings, the Zoning Adjustor canes to these:
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Zoni ng AdJustor has no 3 uri sdi cti on wi th regard to what ki nd of a
dwel l i ng uni t may ul ti mately be pl aced on the 1 ot.
2. The proposal is not detrimental to and is compatible with the public
health, safety and welfare. This statement is qualified to include as long as
access to the parcel does not i nfri nge upon the pri vate property areas of '
either Lot 6 or Lot 8, Mhich border the right-of-way on the northeast and the
southwest respecti vely.
3. The subject property i s deprived of pr1 vi 1 eges conmonly enjoyed by
other properties in the same vicinity and zone and the granting of the
vari ance wi 11 remedy the di fference i n pri vi 1 eges.
4. The granting of the variance is not a grant of special privileges
i nconsi stent wi th pri vi 1 eges enjoyed by other properti es in the dic i ni ty and
zone.
5. Because of special circumstances applicable to the subJect property,&
the 55 to 60 feet of right-of-way which separates the lot from the public
street, as public street is defined in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance in
Section 4.02.030 55., the strict app)ication of the standards of the Spokane
County Zoni ng Ordi nance depri ves the subject property of ri ghts and pri vi 1 eges
of other properties in the area and under identlcal zones.
6. The granti ng of the vari ance i s neither materi al ly detrimental to the
public welfare nor injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity or
aone in which the sub3ect property is located.
7. Yarious performance standards and criterla are additionally needed to
make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity
and zone and to ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public
utilities and these shall be addressed as conditions of approval.
8. The proposal will not be detrimental to the Comprehensive Plan or the
surrounding properties.
9. The Zoni ng Adjustor ma,y requi re such condi ti ons of approval as
necessary and appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public
interest and general welfare.
10. Any finding hereinbefore stated which may be deemed a conclusion
hereln is adopted as such.
OECISION
From the foregoing Findings and Concluslons, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES
the proposal. The following CONDITIONS OF APPROYAL ARE STIPULATED.
) i •
a
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FILE YE-75-86 PAGE 4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. GENERAL
1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and
successors in interest.
2. The Department of Building and Safety shall route the building permit
application to all of the agencies and offices of county government below
wfiich are indicated as needing to give their authorization prior to the
release of a building permit. Upon reviewing the various plans returned
to the Department of Building and Safety by the other departments, the
department wi11 consult with the Planning Department if there are any
changes resulting from review by the other departments when compared to
the plans as approved by the Planning Department. Such review may
necessari 1y resul t i n a revi si on of the si te p1 an for use by the
Department of Building and Safety or possibly a with-holding of the
building permit until any conflicts are resolved.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The Zoning Administration staff of the Planning Department shall make the
3udgement call with regard to proper siting of any residence on the lot,
particularly as it relates to setbacks.
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING 8 SAFETY
1. All buildings and structures require building permits as per Section 301
of the Unifonn Building Code.
2. All manufactured homes require permits as per Section 3.09.010 of Title 3,
Spokane County Code.
3. The Department of Building and Safety shall route the building permit
application to ali of the agencies and offices of county government belorf
which are indicated as needing to give their authorization prior to the
release of a building permit. Upon reviewing the various plans returned
to the Department of Building and Safety by the other departments, the
department wi11 consult with the Planning Department if there are any
changes resulting from review by the ather departments when compared to
the plans as approved by the Planning Department. Such review may
necessari ly resul t i n a revi si on of the si te pl an for use by the
Department of Building and Safety or possibly a with-holding of the
bui 1 di ng permi t unti 1 any confl icts are resol ved.
IY. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. The owner(s) or successor(s) in Interest agree to authorize the County to
place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition
method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s)
property and further not to object by the si gni ng of a protest peti t1 on
against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW
Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition sha11 not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection
to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of lmprovements called
for i n conj uncti on wi th the formati on of a ULID by ei ther peti ti on or
resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94.
2. Pursuant to the Board of County Conmissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the
use of on-si te sewer di sposal systems is hereby authori zed. Thi s
authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations
of the Spokane County Nealth District and is further conditioned and
subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the
Heal th Officer.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with
the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
~ ~ . .
.
w s
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIQN FILE YE-75-86 PAGE 5
4. The drre11 i ng uni t shal l be doubl e pl umbed for connecti on ta future
area-wi de col l ecti on systems.
Y. NEALTH DISTRIC7
1. Sewage di sposai shal a be as authorized by the Di rector vf Uti 1 i ties,
Spakane County,
2. Subject to specific app]ication approvai and issuance of permits by the
Health pfficer, the use of an individual on-site sewage systenn may be
authorized.
3. Water service sha11 be coordinated through the Director of Utilities,
Spokane County.
4, Water service shall be by an existing public xater supply when approved by
the Regiona] Englneer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health
SerYiCeS.
YI. ENGINEER'S AFFICE
1. Priar to the release of a building permit the applicant, heirs or assigns
must sign and record Spokane County "Hotice to the Public No. 4."
DATED THIS j~ DAY 4F July, 1986.
anas os ~
Zoning Adjusto , pokane County
Washington
~
FILED:
1) Applicant
2) Parti es of Record
3) Spokane County Engineers Office
4) Spokane County Heal th pi stri ct
5) Spokane County Utilities Dept.
fi} Spokane County Dept. of Bui 1 di ng & Safety
NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEYED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN
(14) CALENDAR DAYS OF THIS DATE.
vo7sz/7-a6
. .
Roao NAM Is 7
L' ~N014(1`
PAFCFi. N0
No. 4 NOTI(:E TO THE Pt18LI("~~~0~ /K/
,
KNOW ALL MEN BY TNESE PRESENTS, That - James F. Thiel, a einRle nerson
and also Edwin 0. Riohey and Tesanna V. Riahey
being the owners of the following described lands in consideration of mutual benefits
to be hereafter derived do for themselves, their heirs, grantees and assiqns, hereby
agree to the following:
There may be a need in the future to construct a public road to serve the lands
herein described. Said road shall be constructed in accordance with the then
adopted County road standards for public roads. Said road to follow, as near
as practicable, the existing County road right of way.
If additional right of way is required, the owners, their heirs and/or assiqns
agree to deliver to Spokane County a properly signed and executed RiQht of Way
Deed covering the required additional riqht of way.
Join and participate in the formation of a County Road Improvement District
(RID) pursuant to RCW 36.88, at such time as a district may be formed or any
Road Improvement Project sanctioned by Spokane County, which involves the lands
herein described. The owners, their heirs, and assiqns further aqree not to
oppose or protest any legal assessments for said Road Improvement District
(RID) established pursuant to RCW 36.88.
By allowing a building permit to be issued on property havinq access from an
unmairitained County road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said road,
and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obliQation of any kind
or nature whatsoever tv estab1ish, examine, surve,y, construct, alter, repair,
improve, maintain, provide drainage o r snow removal on said road. The require-
ment is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the onwers, their
heirs, successors or assigns, until said road is improved to County standards
and accepted by the County fo r maintenance.
The condittions and statements apply to the following described property:
20541 - 1215
Lot 7, Blook 2, KARLE'S SUBDIVISION, as recorded in Volwae #4, Page
44, in Spokane County,°Washington. In Seo 20, Twp 25 North, Range 44
E. W. M.
The undersigned owners, their heirs, successors or assigns hereby release Spokane
County and all its officers, employees and agents from any responsibility or lia-
bility for any damage whatsoever to the hereinabove described lands and improvements
thereon as a result of allowing a buildinq permit to be issued on property which is
served by a Unmai ntai ned J
These requirements are ar OAc I';:;; ~ nd and shall be binding upon the
owners, their heirs, succ
Dat
ed this day of
1GiCA"`~ s
,
James F. Thiel zawin u* ttianey
'~exanna -V.-"Richey
k/1r! 1/ 1 /%;5 ~
~
A-0541-12"15 81eACK $3002169436 TlilEL, JAMEs r 05f16/76 -rAx uNF'D
fIRE J MF'ROVED ilNrMF'ROVED YCITAI_ LANlD IMl='Cti n TC1TAL
Ac;REs AcREs ~ALuc ~CRcS VAL-uE AcRES vALIa~ VALuE VAL_UE YR EX ccaDE
egoo 8500 86 140
8500 0500 140
.{}0 .00 8500 8530
OPP KA~'~;I_ ES .SUB B:230
1_ T lFt;'
.20541 ~ ~ ~~~EL JAMES r= ~ 9911 ~ ITI-i nVw
SPOKANF wA 99A2106
0,.~'21383 LANtl IMPS TCITAL G bF7RE G AWECI1 CERT ATAX L! AFIl"1F U. VJEED UNPD. IAX
EX COD 8500 (3500 ~ 0q 1.00 116.77 .00 .50 58A 3f3
140 GD500 8500 .00 a00 .00 w00 .00 .00
14l/' l.J w FTR4 U n VJ i::. Ebt lJ I KPAJ n 1 1't X El`E l.r l J d! E 1R tJ 1 Uo~F .i. RE l.J e frJ EG..1J UNPJlJ a 1 1'1 X Ef a l.i SJ 3l E
( fi SF
TFITEi..., ,.lAMES F C7F'P KAf1L ES Sl.1B B2:30 G $6
~ L~ BA''
'20541 --iM'i 5
JEti...T F'iFM ST FiMS BJpFiirfS PTNS BSt"iT t:CINS t1FiEA CCIi+lID 1=F' RCl DW Clp WW F4R BB wS F`AT TNT
c 100
AT~ SPR DK C:PT GAR aoMF' 1.15E UNT'S LQY STZ L e AREA ACRES S. DATE ,S' . F'h lt~E 1; Af= l= CJ
%"E 16000 0 ;~/ti 5r~33 90f)4 ia '69$36
i'~I_D i ttAL BLX? 'VAl.. BI_D 3 tl t11
Z0NE FIEAT ROOF ST DC Aw'F'RAI,SFR
023 3 7
I
Variance No. 1hl.
s~D , T
Name
The following documents are needed before the Engineer's Department can
begin processing your variance application as approved. r
p- legal description of your property ) or copy of deed or t
legal description of your access easement ) instrument t
- a current Assessor's map which depicts the iocation of your property
- a current Assessor's micro-run which will provide ownership informa- ~
ti on
►
- a listing of the names of individuals who will be signing the docu-
ments which will be prepared by the Engineer's Department. These ►
individual names should appear as the person(s) legally sign their
name. ~
- Engineer's sectlon map i
z
The necessary documents will be prepared by the Engineer's Department
u on provision of the informatian noted above. You will be notified when the
documents are ready for signature. The documents may be sent to you, however, ,
it should be noted that all signatures must be notariZed. The Engineer s ~
Department does have notaries available if you choose to sign the documents at r
our office. ~
~
Please a11ow up to ten (10) days for processing of documents. ~
1~I►Ai Noftce ~
Contact person or representetive: L. fe
W
,
Name WiDLI, (2i C,6 ~
Phone qr 1z. -
;
Address Ej Z.11 O
S e kan e p , 49706
Notice to Public No. ~
Other
~ EAw ,.A) o. ~
5 7
t'eI-AH N4 V CL fci+ey ~n A 21
~-i~~es ~ 'I"'t~~ ► .
on, -w-
. • ,
T~1w : . . . . _ . . . _ . . . . .
Tty Mowave Compmp : IM Wv= 01009~ ro11notooms►s ~
~ rot bmNfsflOA swVIOM
. F 1L[O Q.Z I+L rIw"
rx.~D a~ Ar ~rx~~r oF 30.'31 ~U1,yZ ~ r r• - r .il;, t~-_
WIuJAN E. roV,,;u„[
MratoR
w+" owoowo" PWTUM to an&
~~nrrT
mo,,,, HERlW i bERM1N
~ 12340 B. Valleyway
^
Spokane, itA 99216
c+a►. O.r. =rr
Stotutory Wam.,anty DNd
TNg a►tAN7MUft CARMEN HAR'rER, a single woman, as her separate property
1.r.wwiw - or Nine thousand and 00/100--------- (59,000.00) Dollars
ja r../ /~.y, e..r.y, a.d wamwe. to JAMES F. TH IEL, a s i nq le man
i.1.M.wr~ws de.crib.d nW ..w.. .iwa.d in the cauncy ot Spok ane , 9ble d washiacta, :
Lot 7 in Block 2 of KARLE'S SUBDIVISION, as per plat thereof
recorded in Volua~e 4 of Plats, paqe 44;
Situste in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
Subject to: 1983 real estate taxes in the sum of $66.37 and
restrictive covenants and easements imposed in the
dedication of the plat of Karle's Subdiviaion filed
under document No. 342666B.
brrr Tax ►aid ai
Dw
iUP" CHLMG
D E "5
S=445 C~y Tn~r.
~
~ L f nt ,m
~ J' • ' ~
Uatm March 15 .19 83 lij Ax
. .
. .T . ~ • ~ -
r,c • ~,/a.~.~,. ~
bTATE OF WASHINGTON BTATE OF WASHIN(3TON
M.
. .
cc►ux7'y oF'. SpokAne . . COUNTY OF..............................................
On fhia day personally appeared before tee On thia day ot . CARMEN HARTER betore rae. the undersisned. ■ Notary Pubtic ia and tw the Stnu d Wrir
- -
iaglon, duly oomeni~sion~d aad wrorn. Pe*soaallY aPPeared-.........
to rrx knoam to be the individwt described in and
wbo e:ecuted the within and (oregoing irrtruenant,
and
end acicnawiedsed thst .8he.... . signed t!w mam to ae knowr to be . .......................PrNidw~t asd...---...
.
as . her free and voluntary act and doed, nopectively, of....... . . . . .
tor the uws atd purpo~ therein tnentianed. the oc►rporstian that •:ecutsd the toregoing instrvms~nt, awd icl~owii fi-red
the Mid instrument b be the tn+e and voluntary act and daW d sad coepw-
- ~ •tioa. for the umn ud purpmas t?erein enentioned, aad an aetb staewd tlrt
/ - • , ~ f~
. , 1,..... . outhosised to esecute the nld iartr=eent aed that the w1
EN ssal this a!llsed 'u the oorporstr waI ot yid corporadon.
wicnw my hand and olUcial seal heeeto dsed the day aad rar irit
•bove written.
• .~.f••/.Il.~/.~ .
o ry PAtate of Wamh• NoVrv Pul+lic in and tor the 9tate d Wrlwkglow.
.
ane
. . . . . . .
1 niton. fesiding wt
rp~7p pio. F~4ri'r R~r 1•'A
I
, -
~ - ~ - ~ p ~ ~
~ , . ~ I F ~'~h .p' i!~ 4 , '4~ • _ I 3 ~ ~ .
~ ~ - ~ ♦ } - . '
_ ~ h..
~
. ~
. - ~ . f . . -4 .
~.r.
~
1 7 ( i
i~ - ~1 ~ j • L~ 17 -'4
. _ ~ ,~k- • ~i~~ .
Rg ~
.~r i~: s
. j•
• r
i
_~I F 1 ' •
11 ~
lU
. , r~ i ~ •i'''1r. ,
• ~I 1. ~ ~,wT• .
u .
• ~•.i. . ~ ♦ i~~ ~ .
- ~
~ i
~
Y 1 '
~ II
~-'~4 t 1 1
~ ~~1 . r~ F . ~
~
'S
$MW ot Washington 1 88
Q~tp of 8pokane J
I, 4PILLIAhi E. DONAFIIIE, Auditor of gpixane CeunV,
3tate of Wasls.ington, do hereby cortify that the foregoing
instrument is a true and correct cony of tr.e original thereot
now or filp 1n my office.
1::1 TESi i-M4NY WHFF EOF, I have eY`eLtnt,0 Bet ncly
2iand and affixsd th o' ial seal of m f ce, at $pokan p-
~'la shington, this ~ t- day oP
VgILLIAM,E. DONAHUE, Au=li r
Spokane nt , W n
B9 il DEPVTY
..,,r •
a
t o o
O rti.•.~• dk" ~ ~
xoN v `
IAY
J r • < ~ s ~►vE ~
M
Q ~ MA 1 • ; ~
~ j ~ ~ . ` Q Rrv~.w~►O[ ~ 0.
.r ac ~ N ~ ~ .
a r ~ EL• t98 ~ -
< 2 Z t o+iolm 2 3 12'i'
GOUNTY • RoAD
V ~vF t
K A -
RA/ LROAD ~Z
k° o r. MtLWAUKEE - - - - -
~
A ~ ct
.st p
:
4w 75 • 86
. _ • ~►v E ~ ~
FOvRTN , U
aV f. % ts ~ p~f ul
' s <
1 ~C • g t x T
Y t h
< 5 E V ! N'T H
7Th
U1 ~ .
Ul T N
O ~ gTN ~
AvE , 9YH
:16 Z O • 9 T►+ r-
T
.~q~H RY ~ ~i~ • f 10 w+~ ` IO
o IOtA ,tvF. , ~
. . ~
t's~~• 12 1"~ -
z
~ p ~ = v ►
~ ~ ~ : • a ~
~ A ' ~~~•R a v ~p
. ~ • A&
ST
~ ~.1991
` - ~Q ~;+r+-~;' • M 10000
\ +
s Y ~ -
~ ~ • _
I ,
~
~
ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON
t ~
IN THE MATTER OF A VARIANCE FROM THE ~
REQUIREMENT OF FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC STREET. ) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS
(YE-75-86); JAMES THIEL ) AND DECISION
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION:
Although the applicant's lot is located within an appraved subdivision, its
nearest location to a public street is greater than the ordinary 6 to 7 feet
one would expect and hence was 3udged by the Zoning Administrator to not have
adequate frontage on a pub1ic street. Additionally, a portion of the lot
which may be most likely considered to have access on the public street is
only 55 feet in length. Section 4.05.040 of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance requires 65 feet of continuous frontage on a public street.
Authority to consider and grant such a request exists pursuant to Sections
4.03,020 64, and 4.25.030 b, of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
LOCATION:
Located at the northwest end of the intersection of 5th Avenue and Raymond
Road in the Spokane Valley, in the northeast 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25,
Range 44. The Assessors Parcel # is 20541-1215.
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADJUSTOR:
Based upon the evidence presented and circumstances associated with the
project proposal, the Zoning Adjustor APPROYES the variance conditioned as
stipulated below.
PUBLIC HEARING:
After examining a11 available information on file with the application and •
vi siti ng the sub3ect property and surroundi ng area, the Zoni ng Adj ustor
conducted a public hearing on J uly 9, 19869,rpndered a verbal decision on July
9, 1986, and a wri tten deci si on on July 1986.
FINDINGS OF FACT
l. The proposal is located at the northwest corner of the intersection
of 5th Avenue and Raymond Road in the northeast 1/4 of Section 24, Township
25, Ranqe 44 and is further described as Assessors Parcel #20541-1215, being
more completely described in Zoning Ad3ustor File YE-75-86 and Subdivison File
PE-268, Karle's Subdivision.
2. The subdivided property has limited access to the public right-of-way
due to the right-of-way configuration at the southeast corner of the lot.
However, the amount of frontage is estimated at 55 feet as opposed to the
required 65 feet. Additionally, the actual property is approximately 60 feet
from the curb. These two factors caused the Zoning Administrator to make a
Judgement that the lot did not have the required frontage (55 feet versus 65
feet in the Agricultural Suburban zone) on a public street. A public street
is defined as being established, improved and maintained and in that respect
the property is 60 feet from a public street, whereas the rest of the lots in
the subdivision and almost all subdivided lots are within 5 to 10 feet of an
improved street. As a result of the definitions it was the determination that
the 1ot suffered from lack of frontage on a public street and hence needed a
variance from the requirement for 65 feet of frontage on a public street.
3. The lots to the south (lot 8) and the east (lot 6) have been
developed for some time. The owners of these lots have made improvements to
as if the lots were rectangular and as if there was little or no right-of-way
or right-of-passage into the landlocked parcel between them. The owners of
these lots expressed concern that when access is gained to Lot 7, the subject
property, the improvements and the landscaping may be damaged.
a FINdINGS, CONCLUSIONS aND DECISION FILE YE-75-86 PAGE 2
4. As a result of discussion involving a representative from the County
Engineer's Office, the following understandings were reached with regard to
the unimproved and non-mafntained portion of the right-of-way:
a. Any improvements made by a citizen within a right-of-way are
always sub3ect to removal by the government entlty and the land
on which those improvements sit is sub3ect to use by members of
the public, as long as they do so with all the appropriate
permits and approvals which may be necessary from the goverrnnent
entity which has jurisdiction over the right-of-way.
b. Loca1 government has no responsibility to survey the right-
of-way; such is the responsibility of the private adjoining land-
owners.
c. The appl i cant, i f granted the vari ance may uti 1ize any porti on
of the right-of-way leading to his property, Lot 7. This would
include utilizing those portions of the right-of-way which have
been improved by the owners of Lot 6 and Lot 8. If the owners
of Lot 6 and Lot 8 wish to ensure that the owner of Lot 7 is not
trespassi ng on thei r property as it ad3 oi ns the ri ght-of-way,
they would be responsible for a survey to locate the property
line in question. The best advice to the applicant to avoid any
conflict and the need to survey, was for him to conservatively
locate the access to his property in the right-of-way so that it
~ does not cause there to be a question of trespass on the
adjacent Lots 6 and 8,
d. It was pointed out that a curb cut exists on the more south-
westerly porti on of the curb i n the ri ght-of-way area in
question. The applicant would prefer to have a curb cut farther
to the northeast. The County Engineer's Office stated that any
reconstruction of the curb would require an approachlaccess
permit from their office. In response to a question about
whether they would also survey to see that the curb cut was in
the right location, the response was that they would not because
of the usual 6 to 8 feet of difference between the curb and a,
private property. The representative continued that the
granting of an approach/access permit is not a grant of any
right-of-way trespass on any adjoining private property.
5. In response to a question of whether a manufactured home would be
allowed to locate on this lot, the Zoning Adjustor clarified that a double-
wide manufactured home is permltted outright in the Agricultural Suburban
zone. The Zoning Adjustor did, however, point out that the plat dedfcation
contains the following language, "All dwel]ings sha11 be of new construction
and no buildings shall be moved onto any lot." The question of whether or not
thi s Kas 1 anguage enforceabl e by the County, that i s to say, 1 anguage whi ch
over-rides the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, was referred to the Sub-
divi si on Admi ni strator for an interpretation i f an,y member of the publ ic
wished to raise the issue. It was explained that any interpretatfon the
Subdi vi si on Admi ni strator makes i n thf s regard i s admi ni strati vely appeal abl e
to an appeal body without the need to take the issue to Superior Court.
Superior Court would be avallable as an appeal route after a11 administrative
appeals are exhausted within the Spokane County structune.
6. The adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan designates the area of
the proposal as URBAN and the proposal is consistent with the County's entire
Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Plan.
7. The site is zoned Agricultural Suburban, which would allow the pro-
posed use upon approval of this application.
8. The exlsting land uses in the area of the proposal include
residential development of similar or slightly denser development, all of
which are compatible with the proposal.
9. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCMI
pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) ib).
4
t
FINDINGS, CQNCLUSIONS AND DECISION FILE YE-75-86 PAGE 3
14. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendattions of various
CountylState agencies reviewing this project and has indicated he can Comply
wfi th those recammendations.
11. The proposed site plan indicates that setbacks, parking, height of
the structure(s) wi11 conform to the Spokane County Zoning Qrdinance.
12. The proper 1 egal requi rements for adverti si ng of the heari ng before
the Zoning Adjustor vf Spokane Caunty haYe been met.
13. Any concl usion herei nafter stated which may be deemed a fi ndi ng
herein is hereby adopted as such.
From the Findings, the Zoning Adjustar comes to these:
CONCLUSIDNS
1. The Zoning Adjustor has no jurisdiction with regard to what kind of a
dwe11 i ng uni t maky u1 timately be pl aced on the 10t,
2. The proposal i s not detrlmental to and i s compati bl e wi th the publ i c
heal th, safety and wel fare, Thi s statement i s qual i fi ed to incl ude as 1 ong as
access to the parcel does not i nfri nge upon the pri vate property areas of
either Lot 6 ar Lot 8, whfch border the right-at-way an the northeast and the
southwest respectively.
3. The subjeGt Rroperty i s depri ved of privi 1 eges cammoniy enjoyed by
other properties in the same vicinity and zone and the granting of the
vari ance wi 11 reme4y the di fference i n pri vi 1 eges.
4. The granting af the variance is not a grant of specia2 pr~ivfleges
i nconsi stent wi th pri vi 1 eges enjoyed by other properti es irr the vicini ty and
zone.
5. Because of special circumstanees applicable ta the sub3ect property,•
the 55 to 60 feet of ri ght-of-way which separates the 1 ot frort the publ ic
street, as public street is defined 1n the Spokane County Zoning Qrdinance in
Section 4.02.030 55., the strict application of the standards of the Spokane
County tonf ng Qrdi nance depri ves the subject praperty of ri ghts and pri vi 1 eges
of other properties in the area and under identical zones.
+6. The granti ng of the vari ance i s nei ther materi a17y detrimental to the
public,welfare nar injuriaus to property ar impravements 1n the vicinity or
=one in which the subject property is Zocated.
7. Yarious performance standards ancf criteria are additionally needed ta
make the use compatib1 e wi th other permi tted acti vi ti es i n the same vi ci nity
and zane and to ensure against impasing excessive demands upon public
uti 1 i ti es and these sha11 be addressed as conditions of approvai.
8. The prapvsal will not be detrimenta] to the Comprehensive Rlan or the
surrounding properties.
9. The Zoni ng Adjustvr may require such condi ti ons of approval as
necessary and appropriate to make the pra3ect most compatfble with the public
interest and general welfare.
10. Any fi ndi ng herei nbefore stated which may be deemed a conclusi on
herein is adopted as such.
DECISION
From the foregof ng Fi ndi ngs and Canc] usf ons, the Zoning Ad3ustor APPROYES
the proposal. The foi ] owi ng CONDITYONS OF AP'PROVAL ARE 5zIPULATED.
.
~
1
FINDINGS, CQNGLUSIONS AND DECISION FILE YE-75-86 PAGE 4
CONDITIONS Of APPROVAL
I. GENERA1.
1. The fo]lowing conditions sha11 apply to the applicant, owner and
~successors in interest.
2. The Departrrent of Bui 1 ding and Safety sha11 route the bui 1 ding permi t
applicatian to al] of the agencies and affices of county government below
which are indicated as needing to give their autharization prior ta the
reiease of a building permit. Upon reviewing the various plans returned
to the Department of 8uiiding and Safety by the other departments, the
department wi 11 cansult wi th the P1 anni ng Department i f there are any
changes resul ti ng from review by the other departments when compared to
the plans as approved by the Planning Department. Such review may
necessari 1y resul t i n a revisi vn of the sf te p1 an for use by the
Department of Building and Safety or possibly a with-holding of the
bui 1 di ng p+ermi t unti 1 any confl i cts are resol ved.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The Zoni ng Admini stpati on staff of the P1 anni ng Department shal 1 make the
j udgement cal l wi th regard to proper si ti ng of any resi dence on the 1 ot,
particularly as it relates ta setbacks,
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY
1. All buildings and structures require building permits as per Section 301
of the Uni form Bui i di ng Code.
2. Ai 1 manufactured homes requi re permi ts as per Section 3.09.010 of Titl e 3,
Spokane County Code.
3. The Department of Buildinq and Safety shail route the building permit
applfcation ta a11 of the agencies and offices of county gavernment belorf
which are indicated as needing ta gfve their authorization prior to the
release of a building permit. Upvn reviewing the various plans returned
to the Department of Building and 5afety by the other departments, the
department will consult with the Planning Department if there are any
changes resulting from review by the other departments when compared ta
the plans as apprvved by the Planning Department. Such review may
necessarily result in a revision of the site plan tor use by the
Department of Building and Safety vr possibly a with-holding of the
bui 1 di ng permi t unti 1 ary confl i cts are resol ved.
IY. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1, The owner(s) or successor(s) in Interest agree to authorize the Caunty to
pl ace thei r name (s) on a petiti on for the fornati on of a UL ID by peti tion
method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the owner(s)
property and further not to object by the sf gning of a protest pett ti on
against the formation of a ULID by resolutian method pursuant to RCW
Chapter 36,94 which includes the O+rner(s) property. PROYIDED, this
condi ti on shal l nat prohi bi t the Qwner( s ) or Successor( s) f rom objecti on
tv any assessment(s) on the property as a result of fmprovements ca]led
for in canjuncti on wi th the fortnati vn of a ULID by either peti ti on or
resol ution method under RCW Chatpter 36.94,
2. Pursuant ta the Board of Gounty Conmissioners Resolution No. 80-4418, the
use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This
authori zatian i s conditi oned on carmpl iance with a11 rul es and regul ati ons
of the Spokane County Health Di stri ct and i s further condi ti oned and
sub~~ ect ta speci f i c appl i cati on approval and i ssuance of permi ts by the
Hedl th Off3cer.
3. Any water service for th3s pro3ect shal1 be provided in accordance with
the Coordinated Water System PZan for Spokane County, as amended.
f •
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISI4N FILE YE-75-86 PAGE 5
4. The dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future
area-wi de col l ecti on systems.
Y. HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal shall be as authorized by the Oirector of Utilities,
Spokane County.
2. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the
Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage system may be
authorized.
3, water servfce shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities,
Spokane County.
4. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply rrhen approved by
the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health
Services.
YI. ENGINEER'S OFFICE
1. Prior to the release of a building permit the applicant, heirs or assigns
must sign and record Spokane County "Notice to the Public No. 4."
DATED THIS V~6 DAY OF J uly, 1986.
~
omas os
Zoning Adjusto , pokane County
Washington
. "
FILED:
1) Applicant
2) Parties of Record
3) Spokane County Engineers Office
4) Spokane County Heal th Di strict
5) Spokane County Uti 1 i ties Dept.
6) Spokane County Dept. of Bui 1 di ng S Safety
NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEYED BY THIS OECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN
(10) C14LENDAR DAYS OF THIS DATE.
0076z/7-86
~ $80rfQ10344 Raymond Road
~•-„s~~~~~~- 3 2157
. .r,. ,r: t . _...w
NQ 4 •
20541-1215
HOT ICE TO THE PUBL I C /
PURPCrsE VS-75-86 w
t--
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That James F. Thiel; a single man
ur r. 8L IU PI~,GE
YOI.
being the owners of the following described lands in consideration of mutual
benef its to be hereaf ter derived do f or themselves, their heirs, grantees and
assigns, hereby agree to the following:
There may be a need in the future to construct a public road to serve the
lands herein described. Said road shall be consCructed in accordance with
the then adopted County road standards for public roads. Said road to
follow, as near as practicable, the existing County road right of way.
If additional right of way is required, the owners, their heirs and/or
assigns agree to deliver to Spokane CounCy a properly signed and executed
Right of Way Deed covering the required additional right of way.
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to
place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement
District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which
petition includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the
signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method
pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s)
property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method,
as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further
agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the
proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the
formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the
amount of any County participation, exceeds thE cost and expense of
formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID
is suff iciently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or
successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to
object to any assessment(s) on the proper[y as a result of the
improvements called for in conjunction wiCh the formation of a RID by
either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW.
By allowing a building permit to be issued on property having access from
an unmaintained County road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said
road, and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation
of any kind or nature whaCsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct,
alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on said
road. The requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding
Aupon the owners, their heirs, successors or assigns, until said road is
improved to County standards Sq4 aac*pWd+1~~ t1~es O4til~rY for maintenance.
~ ~1UdA~11~ H 13~~r2 `
The conditiona and statements appty tstW~g desc~ibed property:
~ i.~~l1 1Nf :~t~i~ f!~ Mtl:''•".~!' -t ~
+ b!4.~'~'dA 4,it~i
x~~a••+r~~~a~oss
I.ot 7, Block 2 of KARLE' S SUl~°btd1*5`~6N, as recorded in Volume 4 of Plats,
Page 44 in Spokane County, Washington. Located in Section 20, Township
25 North, Range 44 East, W.M.
RF RU z i
JUL 3 59 PH
wIlloAN E. avytiA!fE
AUt3rTOR
[SPOKaNE COOHM, MfAStLI
~ l~E ritT 7 _
IL
The undersigned owners, their heirs, successors or assigns hereby release Spokane
County, and all its officers, employees and agents from any responsibility or
lisbility for any damage whatsoever to the hereinabove described lands and
improvements theteon as a result of allowing a building permit tQ be issued on
property which is served by a Unmaintained County road.
These requirements are and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the
owners, their heirs, successors or assigns.
of F.
VOI. 979 PAGE 88
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set mY hand(s) ard aeal(s) this 1 day
of Julv , 19 88 .
t -
Ja s F. Thiel STATE OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss
On this day personally appeared before me James F. Thiel
personally known to me to be the fndividual(s) who executed the forgoing instrument
and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
said individuaZ(s), Eer the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
Given under my hand and seal this 1 day of July , 19 88 .
0 ~ • ~ • ~NOIARY PUR~
~ fOR TNE STATE OF Dub 1 ic . ~
i MY COmNISS ON nd tor the State of Washington,
• NOYEM9ER ftINSsiding in Sp okane
, ~ j } r'! •f
. .
Variance No.~- 75= k(o
Sa? O, T ;?s N, 8
Name
' .
#99:0a~
The following documents are needed before the Engineer's Department can
begin processing your variance application as approved. ~40
legal description of your property MA2
copy of deedfor conveying
0-- iega, pCioa-a~~~~~r g 88 ~~Pm~C instrument
0- a current Assesaor's map which depicts the location of your property
6g) 0- a current Assessor's micro-run which will provide ownership informa-
tion c:2
a listing of the names of individuals who will be signing the docu-
ments which will be prepared by the Engineer's Department. These
individual names should appear as the pereon(s) legally aign their
name.
0 - Engineer's section map
The neces8ary documents will be prepared bq the Engineer'e Department
upon provision of the information noted above. You will be notified when the
documents are ready for signature. The documents may be sent to you, however,
it should be noted that all signatures must be notarized. The Engineer's
Department does have notaries available if you choose to sign the documents at
our office. ,
Please allow up to ten (10) days for processing of documents.
Contact person or representative:
Name~,~~~
Phone ao *
Address
6j4&&,, xmig ~
Notice to Public No. ~
Other
720/4 ~
` • ~~Q~' o~ d~~~
0
20541- i 2i 5 BLACK 8300269436 TMIEI.., JAMES F 45/1 6/?b TAK UNPD
FIRE IMF'hC)VED lJNTMw'RQV~D T0TAL 1..AND IMPR. TOrAL
A~CRES ACRES VALUE ACR£S VAI..UE ACRES VAt_UE VFtLUE VALUE YR EX CUX)E
8500 5504 88 140
0500 8500 144
.oa poa 8500 8500
oPP kARLES s~~~ B'230
B21
?0541 1 &2 15 1 TH1 EL , JAMES F S i 117 F'ERRY AVE
SF't]K AAlE WA 99202
1~3187 LAND .L MPS TClTAL C. F xRE C. WEED CERT, TAX U. F x FiE U. WCED UNPD. TAX
EX CaI3 8500 8500 .00 1.00 g a9 + 9g .00 A54 64A95
140 8500 8500 .00 .00 .00 . t}o .o0 . Qo
4 44U a F'IRE U. WEED UNF`D. TAX EX CODE YR ST U. F I RE U. WEED UNPD.TAX EX CppE
YR ST
T'H I EL , JAMES F 0PP K ARLES SUB B2.30 C: 88
~ ~7 B '22
20544 --1 2-'i 5
BLT REM ST RM,~ ~~RMS" BTHS BSM7' C:ONS AFtFA CC1ND f°"1=' hCl IDtJ GA WW RR BB SS F`AT TNT
C io0
AT~'~ SF'R UK CF' r~AR 5MF' l.lSE UNTS LQ7 SlZ l.. ,AREA AL'RE.S' S. DAIE S. r'~'1 TCE 'f % AFF tl
SE 16000 03/151f33 9000 002-6943e5
Dl„.D i VAL BL.D '21 VAL. EiLD 3 VAL
ZONE NIEAT ROC11= .S.'IDE APN'RAISER
23 37
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
pate Julv 3, ,1986
Inter-oFfice Cornmunication
TQ Spokane County Zoning Adjustor
Fronr Spokane County Engineer a" Subject Agenda Items Scheduled for Public Hearing July 9? 1986
1. WVN -11-86- ON YAN NGUYEN - We have no comments to make relative to this
application.
2. WVE -6-86 Postlewait Const. - We have no commenta to make relative to this
application.
3. VS 68-86 Metzger -The property served by the road easement described in the
application for the variance is 28 feet in width. It appears as if the pareat
parcel from which the subject parcel has been segregated could be further divided
at a future date. If this were to happen the width of the access easement would
have to be 40 feet. It ie our recommendation that a 40 foot wide easement be
required as a condition of approval of this application. This will bring the
application into compliance with County Road Standarde and allow for access to
future divieions of property.
4. VW 74-86 Moatgomery - Since the proposal is served by a private road easement the
attached commente are applicable.
5. VE 75-86 Thiel - That the property affected by this application has frontage on a
non establiehed - non maintained public road Right of Way. Prior to the release of
a building permit the applicant must sign and record Spokane County "Notice to the
Public #4". Thie document acknowledges that Spokane County ie not responsible for
conatrucLion of the road or maintenance. It also provides that the applicant
agrees to join in and not oppose or protect the cre$tion of a Road Improvement
Dietrict created for the purpose of improving said Right of Way.
BMc/kh '
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR - PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA: July 9, 1986
TIME: As set forth below
PLACE: Spokane County Planning Dept., N. 721 Jefferson St., 2nd floor
hearing room.
5. VE-75-86 RELAXATION OF ROAD FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT
(This item will be Located at the west end of the inter-
heard at 2:30 p.m. or section of 5th Avenue and Raymond Road,
as soon thereafter as in the NE 1/4 of Section 20-25-44.
possible)
PROPOSAL: To allow a single family
residence to be located on a
parcel of land having 55' of
frontage on a county maintained
road, whereas Section 4.05.040
of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance requires 65' of
continuous public road frontage
in the Agricultural Suburban
zone.
SITE SIZE: 16,300 sq. ft.
APPLICANT: James Thiel
-3-
~ -
I
VOKAiIt COUNTY 'LAIIHtNd 0!'AR'TMl `
APPL~CATIONS BEFORE THE ZONIIiG ADJUSTOR BOARD OF ADJ
~ / USTMENT
.
Ce rt i fi cate of ExerrQti on y Appl i cati ori
Name of Appl i cant: ~.4115' loq,~
'
Street Address : co1 g
yy~ H ome :`3 2 S"./~-q ~ City: ic~w'E State: ~ r Zip Code: Phone:Work: ~
Name of Property Owner(s) :
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Ci rcle Appropriate Action) :
~
Variance(s) Conditional Use Permit Non-Conforming Lot/Use
Waiyer of yi,olatior) Temporary Use/Structure Other:
*
* FOR STAFF USE ONLY *
* ~ *
* Ci te 0 rdi n an ce Se cti on :-4 . dS~. Q¢D O1 d Co de : New Co de : ~
*
*Section 1.0 Towriship 'Is Range 144 Property Size:JL.30oy~
*
*Existing Zoning: ~ e?"cc(5 VR-LS~fJ F.L.U.P. Designation:
*PSSA: N UTA: Y N ASA: Y N FIRE DIST.: ~ LEGAL CHECKED BY: ~
*
*Heari ng Date: Staff taki rig i ri App] i cati on : * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * ; * ~ * * * * * * * *
E xi s ti n g Us e o f P rope rty : LA-r~t~
Describe Intended Proposal : p o 4!7 -WZ p-C-
-'151~~ /--14 .fw 9 ~ 7 ~ z_1
Legal Descri ption of Property ( Incl ude easement i f appl i cabl e) :
l9+ R L.. s
Parcel Source of Legal : .
Total amount of acijoini ng 1 and controlled by thi s owrier/sponsor: iU °IV 4E,
What iriterest do you hoid in the property: E)~N
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
~o
I SWEAR, UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORI-
ZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERh1ISSION FROM SAID
OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHA IS ATTACHED; AND (3) L OF THE ABOVE
RESPONSES AND THOSE 4N SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS A MADE TRUTHF L THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE.
~ - Si~ed: ~
Address : 9 9 J/
_ Phone No. : 9,,~-i Date :
~
NOTARY SEAL: Nota .
Date:
-
(nVPrl
_t ' L , . •
A. BURDEN OF PROOF
It is necessary for the appl i cant or his/her representati ve to establ ish the
reasons why the requested proposal shoul d be approved and to l iteral ly put forth
the basi c case. Accordi ngly, you shoul d have been gi ven a form for your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc. ) designed to help you present your case
in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Acjustor must consider.
Please fill the form out and return it with your application. If you didn't get a
form, ask the Planning Department personnel for advi ce on haw to proceed.
B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS
X COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
~ A rel iminary consul tation has been hel d to discuss the proposal. The appl i-
a t haai fo of requi re s d ndards.
a ke) IDn te i g-off Udived)
2. COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT
A prel iminary consul tation has been hel d to discuss the proposal. The appl i-
~o4N cant Pts been inf d of requi rements and standards. ~
` S"
~S gnatu CDate (Sign-off Waived)
~ COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Waive if outside WMAB)
u' A;preliminary co ultation has been F~eld to discuss the proposal. The
/ pl ic a n informed of requ ments arid standards.
gnatu rtv) D (Si gn-off Wai ved)
The appl i cant i s requi red to di s cuss the p roposal wi th •
to become inforTned of requi rements and
standards.
,
(Distri ct Si gnature) (Date) (Si gn-off Wai ved)
4'.-'/"WATER PURVEYOR (Waive i f outsi de CWSSA) NAME:
a) The proposal is/1s not located within the boundary of our future service area.
b) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our current distri ct.
c) We are/are not able to serve this site with adequate water.
d) Satisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to serve this proposal.
(Si gnature) (Date) Wign-of ai ved)
~ t-A-°
,
APPLICANT'S FORM
NAME : 7
FILE
I. YARIANCES The County Zoning Ordinance, Section 4.03.020 (64), cl arifies
that vari ance i s an adjustment made to a "dimensional" regul ation.
Websters New Collegiate Dictionary (1979) defines "dimension" as a
measure in one direction. (and therefore includes "area").
A. State Law C36.70.020 (14) RCW1... Is the subject property deprived of
privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in same vicinity and zone and
does the variance remedy the difference in privileges? f~ so, what privileges?
Y - `
.
r ~
~
t
B. Because of speci al ci rcumstances appl icable to subject property, including
size, shape, topography, location or surrouridirngs, does strict application of
the dimensional regulatton depcive the subject property of rights/privileges
enjoyed by other properti'es in vicinity under IDENTICAI. zones? If yes, what
speci al ci rcurtcstances exist?
, , .
.
~'A'D" 11
•
C. Wi 11 granting of the vari ance be materi al 1y detrimental to publ i c wel fare OR
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the
subject property is located? •
J .
•
. ~
~
, pG ,~,,•~1~►-~ O''r
'C)
~
` ,~.~G~~,,,,)-t'~~~, ''~'~..C~
;
r~
\J
i /
/ L^ t
~ ~
i
i
i~ r,~•~•
; G ~,,,,,I , r +•+r
..~►•r+o ' ~c'A''~"~" +til 1"5 ~ D~
%.A
4b
~