VE-103-87
919
ZONIIVG ADJUSTOR 9~
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF VARIANCES FROM THE ) FINDINGS,
MINIMUM STANDARD FOR FRONTAGE ON A ) CONCLUSIONS
PUBLIC ROAD AND LOT AREA. ) AND DECISION
RONALD BEAUCHAMP f(VE-103-87 (A & 8) )
(Companion File SP-529-88) )
SVMMARY QF APPLLCATIQN:
The applicant proposes to Short Plat an approximately Yz a%cre parcel which contains two
(2) existing residences. The two lots proposed to be created would have substandard
frontage and substandard lot area for the zone in which they exist. In order for a Short Plat
to be approved, variances from these standards must be granted. Section 4.04.040 of ihe
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires 100 feet of continuous public road frontage,
whereas the proposed lots would each have 69 feet of frontage. Section 4.04.040 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance also requires a minimum lot area of 12,500 square feet,
whereas the proposed parcels would each have approximately 11,100 square feet, as set
forth in the application. Authority to consider and grant such a request exists pursuant to
Sections 4.03.020 64. and 4.25.030 b. of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
LOCATION:
The property is generally located in the Spokane Valley, south of and adjacent to Mission
Avenue and east of Barker Road in the NW Y4 of Section 17, Township 25N, Range 45EWM.
The Assessor's Parcel Number is 17552-0145. The properties are addressed as E. 18902
and E. 18904 Mission Avenue.
DEGISION OF THE ZONING ADJUSTOR:
6ased upon the evidence presented and circumstances associated with the project proposal,
the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the variances as applied set forth in the application. The
condition of approval which requires ten (10) feet of dedication for future public right-of-
way reduces the lot area square footage, below what was proposed, by approximately 552
square feet per lot, bringing the parcel sizes to approximately 10,419 square feet. This
additional right-of-way dedication also, according to the survey submitted with the
application, locates one (1) of the dwelling units approximately 34' 7" from the front
property line; accordingly, an administrative variance to accommodate this front yard
infringement is hereby granted, pursuant to 4.25.030 i.
PUBLIC HEARINQ:
After examining all available information on file with the application and visiting the
subject property and surrounding area, the Zoning Adjustor conducted a public hearing on
Februarv_ 10: 19$8 rendered a verbal decision on February 10, 1988, and a written
decision on February 17, 1988~
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposal is generally located in the Spokane Valley, south of and adjacent to
Mission Avenue and east of Barker Road in the NW Y4 of Section 17, Township 25N, Range
45EWM and is further described as Assessor's Parcel Number is 17552-0145, being more
completely described in Zoning Adjustor file #VE-103-87 (A-B), Short Plat file SP-
529-88 and Certificate of Exemption file CE-184-84 (A-B).
2. The proposal consists of the applicant's desire to establish two (2) separate lots
from a parent parcel of approximately Y2 acre. The parent parcel contains finro dwelling
units which were constructed approximately 40 years ago. These dwellings were
constructed on a larger parcel, being some 6.4 acres in size, prior to the property being
zoned Agricultural. The dwelling units were also constructed at a time in which more than
one dwelling unit could be constructed on a single parcel of land. At the time the .
Agricultural zoning went into effect, 1957, the dwelling units became legal nonconforming
f ~
CASE NO. VE-103-87 (A & B); Ronald Beauchamp
ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION PAGE 2
structures existing on the larger parcel of land. Research by the Zoning Adjustor secretary
showed that several large acreage parcels (lots 3, 4 and 5) were purchased in 1976 by Mr.
and Mrs. Irwin Gordon. In 1982, Gordon's segregated the land, thereby creating the subject
Yz acre parcel (parcel 17552-0145) and this parcel was sold to the applicant in 1987.
In 1982 the Gordons failed to get a Certificate of Exemption for the parcels of land, and
hence, the lots existed in violation of the Subdivision Law until 1984. In 1984 the
adjoining ownership of the Gordon's to the east and the south was proposed to be a
manufactured home park. At that time, it apparently came to light that no Certificate of
Exemption had been issued for the Yz acre parcel which contains the two existing dwelling
unit and Certificate of Exemption #CE-184-84 (A) was issued by the Planning Department.
It apparently never came to light that there were two existing dwelling units on the
parcel of land, or the Certificate of Exemption would never have been issued, and an platting
solution would have occurred at that time. The Certificate of Exemption application did say
that the proposed use of the land was for housea (note the plural use of-the word). In that
respect, the Planning Department personnel inadvertently contributed to the applicant's
present practical difficulty by issuance of a Certificate of Exemption when one should not
have been issued.
The present applicant purchased the Y2 acre parcel of land in 1987 and now has a
desire to sell one of the dwelling units. It was not possible to sell one of the dwelling units
until it existed on it's own separate piece of real estate. Hence, the applicant has applied for
the short plat and found the necessity to seek variances from the Zoning Ordinance
requirements which require 100 feet of continuous public road frontage per lot and require
12,500 square feet of area for each lot.
3. The adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan designates the area of the
proposal as Urban and the proposal is consistent with the County's entire Comprehensive
Plan, including the Future Land Use Plan.
4. The site is zoned Agricultural, which would allow the proposed use upon approval
of this application.
5. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include many manufactured
home parcels, both rental and ownership, many of which are occupied but some of which are
not developed and occupied, all of which are compatible with the proposal. Specifically,
most of the residential manufactured home lots, either renta) or ownership, are similar in
size and frontage to the proposal set forth by the application.
6. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of Chapter 43.21 C RCW pursuant to
WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b).
7. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various
County/State agencies reviewing this project and has indicated he can comply with those
recommendations.
8. The proposed site plan indicates that setbacks, parking, height of the
structure(s) will conform to the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. With a ten (10) foot
dedication for additional right-of-way on Mission Avenue, an administrative variance of less
than one (1) foot will be needed for the easterly structure to conform to the proper front
yard setback.
9. No one appeared to oppose the proposal nor were any written comments adverse
to the proposal received.
10. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning
Adjustor of Spokane County have been met.
1 1. These variances can only be granted as associated with a short plat or a standard
plat pracess in order to authorize the parcels of land as consistent with Chapter 58.70 RCW.
12. Any conclusion hereinafter stated which may be deemed a finding herein is
hereby adopted as such.
From the Findings, the Zoning Adjustor comes to these:
\
1
CASE NO. VE-103•87 (A & B); Ronald Beauchamp
ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION PAGE 3
CONCLUSIONS
1. The variance will not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in ihe zone.
2. With the conditions of approval set forth below, the variance will: a) not
constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with limitations on other properties in
the vicinity and similar zone; b) ensure that the intent and purpose of the Zoning Ordinance
is achieved with regard to location, site design, appearance, and landscaping, etc; and c)
protect the environment, public interest and general welfare. Numerous other parcels and
lots in the area are nearly equal to these in size and frontage, if not in some instances
smaller. These structures are already existing, and whether or not actual subdivision and
variances are granted, they will remain as they presently appear.
3. There are special circumstances applicable to the property which when combined
with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance, create practical difficulties for the use of the
property and/or deprive the property of rights and privileges common 'to other properties
in the vicinity and similar Zone classifications. The dwelling units were created legally at
the time they were constructed and have remained as legal nonconforming uses throughout
the years. When the oounty approved the Certificate of Exemption which created parcel -
0145 in 1984, it in effect authorized the situation from which the applicant now partially
seeks relief. The County, as a contributor to the situation, should be involved in assisting to
solve the situation in a manner which is favorable to the present applicant, insofar as there
will be no adverse off-site impacts and no illegality remaining.
4. Granting the variances will be neither materially detrimental to the public
welfare nor injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity and zone.
5. Strict application of the zoning standards does create an unreasonable burden in
light of the purpose to be served by the standards.
6. The case for the variances was not supported by substantial reference to or
reliance upon illegal or non-conforming precedent(s).
7. Granting the variances will not adversely affect the overall zoning design, plan or
concept for either the immediate area or the entire County.
8. The case for a variances was not based substantially upon a lack of reasonable
economic return nor a claim that the existing structure is too small.
9. Granting the variances will not be inconsistent with the general purpose and
intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
10. The practical difficulty which gives rise to the variance requests did exist before
the present owner acquired the property.
1 1. The granting of the variances will not result in defacto zone reclassification.
12. The requested variances are not substantially for the purpose of circumventing
density regulations designed to protect the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer.
13. Various performance standards and criteria are additionally needed to make ttle
use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure
against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities and these shall be addressed as
conditlons of approval.
14. The proposal will not be detrimental to the Comprehensive Plan or the
surrounding properties.
15. The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as necessary and
appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public interest and general
welfare.
16. Any finding hereinbefore stated which may be deemed a conclusion herein is
adopted as such.
3
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings and Conciusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the
proposal and defers to the companion short plat, SP-529-88, for implementation of
specific conditions of approval. An administrative variance is issued pursuant to 4.25.030
i. which will allow the easterly dwelling unit to extend into the front yard a distance not to
exceed one (1) foot, zero (0) inches. The following CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE
STIPULATED.
_CQNDITIQNS 4F APPRQVAL
1. GENERAL
1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in
interest.
2. Failure to comply with any of the conditions of approval contained in this
decision, except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the
Zoning Ordinance and be subject to such enforcement actions as are appropriate.
3. Most of the conditions of approval which would ordinarily appear hereinafter are
deferred to the short plat decision regarding the same property.
4. The approved variances will run with the land and are appropriate even upon the
ultimate demolition of the existing dwelling units and any reconstruction which may occur
in the form of separate single family dwelling units.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The variances are granted contingent upon filing of a final short plat.
2. Because the Arterial Road Plan portion of the circulation element of the 1981
Comprehensive Plan requires an 80 foot right-of-way for east Mission Avenue at this
location, an additionai ten (10) feEt of right-of-way is required to be oedicateti
commensurate with this variance decision and the accompanying final short plat SP-529-
88. This reduces the lot depth to approximately 151 feet, reduces the lot surface area to
approximately 10,548 square feet and reduces the front yard building setback on the east
lot to approximately 34'-701, as opposed to the required 35-0".
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY
1. Defer to the short plat process associated with SP-529-88.
IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Defer to the short plat process associated with SP-529-88.
V. HEALTH DISTRICT
t. Defer to the short plat process associated with SP-529-88.
VI. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1. Defer to the short plat process associated with SP-529-88.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE
COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS CAN BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE
OF THE (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR
EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PRQJECT APPROVAL
IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL
CASE NO. VE-103-87 (A 8 B); Ronald Beauchamp
ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION PAGE 5
DATED this 17th day of February, 1988.
Thomas G. Mosh , ICP
Zoning A or
Spokane County, Washington
FILED:
1 ) Applicant
2 ) Parties of Record
3) Spokane Counry Engineering Department
4) Spokane Counry Health District
5) Spokane County Utilities Department ,
6) Spokane County Department of Building & Safety 7) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File
8 ) File #SP-529-88.
NOTE: ONLY THE APPUCANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN
TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET,
SPOKANE, WA 99260. (Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance)
A0~~,~i'~.i~r7~\~~
. i ~ '
RECEIilED
L PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ , ; i,
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILOING N. 721 JEFFERSANEM 1988
PHONE 456-2205 'p'1KANE COUNTY ENGINE,r
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
. - . , „ _ •:+r.
SPOKANC COUNTY GOURT MOUSE
AGENDA: February 10, 1988
TIME: As sct forth below; hearing opens at 9:00 a.m.
PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department
Broadway Centre Building
North 721 Jefferson Strect
Spokane, WA 99260
APPLICATIONS MAY BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER, EXCEPT THAT ITEMS
CARRIED OVER FROM THE PREVIOUS HEARINGS WILL BE HEARD FIRST. LEGAL
DFSCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJEC'I'S ARE AVAILABLE IN
THE PLANMNG DEPARTMENT FILES.
APPEALS OF ANY OF THE DECISIONS ON THE BELOW-LISTED CASFS MAY ONLY BE
FIILED BY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD ACCOMPANIED BY A
$100.00 FEE. (Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance.)
1) VN-103-87 (A & B) VARIANCE FROM THE MINTMUM
(This item will be heard ELTBLIC RQAp FRQN'I'AQE AND LOT AREA
at 9:00 a.m. or as soon MEN-U
thereafter as possible.) Generally located in the Spokane
Valley, south of and adjacent to
' Mission Avenue and east of Barker
Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 17.
Township 25N, Range 45EWM. PROPOSAL: The applicant requests four (4) variances regarding two (2)
parcels proposed to be created from a single parcel presently containing two
(2) existing dwelling units to: (1 & 2) allow a dwelling unit to remain on each
of the two (2) proposed parcels of land having sixty-nine (69) feet of
continuous public road frontage, whereas Section 4.04.040 of the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance requires 100 feet of continuous public road frontage;
and (3 & 4) allow these two (2) proposed parcels to have a minimum lot area of
approximately 11,100 sq. ft. each, whereas Section 4.04.040 of the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum lot area of 12,500 sq. ft.
EXISTIING ZONIIVG: A g ri c u 1 t u r a 1
STI'E SIZE AND LOCATION: Approximately 11,100 sq. ft. each parcel
E. 18902 and 18944 Mission Avenue
APPLICANT: Ronald D. Beauchamp
2423 N. Drummond
Otis Orchards, WA 99027
Page 1 of 2
V
~ V uj ` AA ~ r-♦ s~ ~ '
~ O ~ \ /y • f ' ._.'~~ti • 1T] , ' ' . • 1
~i
MVE-103-8 7=A&B
L.>5 . ~ ~ ~ .
~ f? 1
5503
- ~
0
EL.PO00
N
N
C1 =
Q e
t 1.I~DW1N iy
O x ~
W
Q' ~ W
> Yt~ - ~
W v
STA%
~
1* 182 183 184 185 186(10) r87 188 te9 190
~ 92 133 194 195 i9 197 198 199 200 201
.
MAXWfLLL
.
MAX VY E L L AV n OC rc 5~xA ~1001 W W O N R
~ (Ete•nc tarr)
~ ~ Q ,
Q
~.5+ Z L _ 1 A
W
W • ep0 - i
0~ G
)NE ET ~ • ~
i
„ CATALDO a;~;...,Y.
. . .
.
FREEwAir~
E
1' r-J rl o
a . ~G I
c,~, c ~
.h ~ P
L . Pos
• . , . ~ 1: iooo ~
w^v
~ , ~ f, . . i' .
Y ~ t /►vE ~
c ~ O
' - M 1 N ~
s. ~
SPOKANE COUNTY
TITLE COMPANY
W. 426 BOONE AVENUE TELEPHONE (509) 326-2626
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
CLR"1'l F1Cf1TE TU St-IOK1' PLAT
Ron Beauc;hamp
2423 N. Drummond Ild.
Otis Orchards, WA 99027
Order No.: 28270
In the matter of the plat submitted, this Company has examined the records of
Spokane County, Washington, as of December 11, 1987 at 8:00 a.m., and from such
examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land
situate in Spokane County, to-wit:
The West 138 feet of the North 161 feet of Lot S, Block 1, CORBIN ADDITION TO
GREENACRES, as per plat recorded in Volume "S" of Plats, pages 30 and 31, records
of Spokane County;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
The record owner is:
RON D. BEAUCHAMP and J UDY L. BEAUCHAMP, husband and wife
EXCEPTIONS:
1. • LIABII.ITY TO FUTURE ASSESSMENTS, if any, by Consolidated Irrigation District
No. 19. Further information can be obtained by callinb 624-4291.
2. DEED OF TRUST, to secure an indebtedness, including any interest, advances,
or other obligations secured thereby;
Amount: $22,500.00
Dated: October 23, 1987
Recorded: November 21 1987
Recording No.: 8711020104
Grantor: Ron U. E3eauchamp and Judy L. Beauchamp,
husband and wife
Trustee: Spokane County Title
Beneficiary: Spokane Railway Credit Union
Affects: East half of sai.d premises
Cont ij e f$0UCY ISSUING AGENT FOR
03 SAFECO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
~
.
Order No. 28270
EXCEPTIONS, 1'abe 2
3. AGRLEPIENT, including the terms, covenants anci provisions thereof, entered
into;
Between: Spokane Valley Farms Company, a corporation
And: Community Scrvice Company, a corporation
Kecorded: November 15, 1923
Recording No.: 733599
, Providing: Supplying of water
4. EASEMENT including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof, as granted
by instruinent;
Kecorded: December 2, 1964
Recording No.: 67734C
In favor of: The United States of America
For: To construct, reconstruct, operate and
maintain an irrigation turnout and appurtenances
Affects: Portion of this and other property
S. EASEMENT, including the terms, covenants and provisions thereof, for
electric transmission line and/or distributiQn line, together with necessary
appurtenances, as granted by instrument; Recorded: June 11, 1971
Recording No.: 554951C
In favor of: The Washington tVater Power Company, a
corporation
Affects: Lot 5, Block 1
Said instrument recites in part as follows:
It is understood and agreed that easement covers the right to place one (1)
pole and one (1) anchor together with the right of overhang over and across
said property as surveyed and staked thereon.
6. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS contained in deed;
Reeorded: November 1, 1929
Recording No.: A11654
As follows:
•"1. That all buildings built on Lots 17 to 34 inclusive in Block 15,
and Lots 24 to 46 inclusive in Block 15, shall be constructed of brick
or fire-proof material.
2. No property sold in Corbin Addition to Greenacres shall be used for
business purposes of any kind prior to January lst, 1929, except the property
specified in paragraph one preceding and except Lots 1 to 10 inclusive
in Block 12, Lots 1 to 10 inclusive in Block 15, and Lots 1 to 23 inclusive
in Block 23, provided however, that this shall not prevent the owner of
any tract of land in said Addition from selling the products raised by
such owner on said tract.
3. No dwelling shall bc erected or permitted to remain on said land of
less cost than $1,800.00; however, a temPorary house may be built and
used far not to exceed two years. All buildings must be painted or stained.
At least une-half of said land shall be impruved within two years from
date of purchase."
Continued; Page 3
~
~
Ordcr No. 28270
EXCEPTIOh'S, Page 3
7. RESERVATIONS contained in deed;
From: Spokane Vallcy Farms Co.
Recorded: November 1, 1929
Recording No.: A11654
As follows:
, "The Company hereby reserves and the purchaser does hereby grant unto
the said Company the rights ot way now or hereafter deemed necessary by
said Company for the construction and maintenance of irrigation flumes,
di-tches and pipe lines over and across the above described land for the irrigation
of said land as well as other lands, with the right and privilege to enter
upon said land for survey, location, construction and repair of said irrigation
conduits."
8. EXCEPTIONS AIVD RESERVATIONS common to the area;
From: Spokane Valley Irrigation District No. 10,
a public corporation
As follows:
"The Grantor reserves the right to construct, repair and maintain over
and across said premises any ditches, flumes, pipelines and electric lines,
now existing or hereafter required by the Grantor for district service,
and the Grantor reserves an easement and necessary right of way thereon
and therein for said purposes."
END OF EXCEPTIONS
NOTE #1: GENERAL TAXES for the year 1987, WHICH HAVE BEEN PAID;
Amount: $771.84
Tax Account No.: 17552-0145
NOTE #2: ASSESSMENTS for Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, for the
year 1987, WHICH HAVE BEEN PAID;
Amount: $188.16
Tax Account No.: 17552-0145
NOTE #3: The address of the premises according to the Spokane County Tax Roll
• is as follows:
UNDISCLOSED
END OF NOTES
BJS/ls
SPOKANE COUNTY TITLE COMPANY
Charge: NO CHARGE „
By ~ 'OV
BERNI . STACXI
f
~ •
_ . ~ ~ . . .
~
i.~•~- .~i.a• 4w•R i.so,~ .
4 ~ " MiSS10iv---- w-v C ~ - - 9-
V- a~•• li~i ~a.,.. ✓kr.• Ji~r• ~ . ,►~.1.i' ~i~.~
~ ~ ~O~ = e!y2 O' ~ lAo/Ow
,..,s •.-.~r s. ~ ~ . . •
. A,.r.raJ . ~ ~i ~ Q? ~ i ~ • Q ~ 7 Q` ~ ~
fOaf ~ l~it~ ~ _ ~ ~ 2 .ia. Liv n ~ \ ~
~ ~ . ~ • ~ J Q' '0 V • ~J
± • ` ~ 6 ~ Of' > ~„ui-l
:o 4,~ r (D. o ~ W.
v ' O ~ ; :r►- .
200, Q(D
' _ ~O O ~ Ut
V ~ rj~' ~ .►ut~ ~ ~e i• ~ - ~
Q.062 2 p~ 04
F,tIle' !I!!' d i ~ • Il N~' Q~
~ ~ • ~ • ~ ~
~ r.A V)Ar . m, 5 ;'~~O O~~ ; 1 O.
~ G.v.~iv ; • ~ ~--~t~♦ ~a n ~ i~~~• ~
' ~ ; 1 ~ i• i ~ , OZ t ~
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
' ~ - - ~
~~I O ~ 'Q ~ I'~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ O ~ j ~~l+• O1 ~ O L~,~
~ . • , ~ ~ tJ
~0 .w• , ~ f`~~f p a 1
_ ~ i I~ 1„i ~ • Z e -r~
r~•' 3 a ~ ~ ~ O i ~ ~ ~e'~ OG~~ ss' .
~ , • ~ cp e~ ~ , i G. N ~
R..
~
J
;iy~ i~&A ~ p.~ ~--~~y._IG ~ ' ^ • . •
~.e• L 1 s ~ "~Kt ~/N~• . %
♦ ~ _ ~p,st j j I•J
ti
a*
t N,f
• 1
O f~~~11Y - ' y~l r'ft~"5~ . ~
~ a ~ I r ~
~i~ ~ • ~ e ~ ~ ~
• . •
~ ; , , O ♦ ! .
- ~ o ~ • ~ ~
. I
i N O
~ 7
r.
4ACATE ` I~Q-J'~-y,-fl~ l JO•S~ 14~1~f•ROAU I"/Lt 72E0 *XG= ~ .
1 - . ' "i t'2 `.•ivr• ~ J o• ~v~ ~ ~ ✓Oo' ` ~
, , .
t. • ~ ' I IJ I ~ - , ! / ;
. s.,.,. • ~ o ~ , , ,
✓AC. R/W OCEO ~ rO COUNrY , !CATALDO . VE
j'~ No z
4
,
1l1~. ~ ` _ w ' ' _ ' - ~ `1'• _ ~ 1
`
, .
: ~ . lo.~.r' . _~r..~i•1~ ! ' ~ ~i
'd
~ f'
4&
o d
• ' • ~ o
i i. I 7(D O . ~ ► i ~ \ ~L~J ~
~ ~ .R I I ~ ~b'l' ~ I ~ ~
j✓o r .
. G ~-•-_--_-__-----2.o Z__------_____- - ~ ~f ~_I ' ' ~ , ' ' . I ~J~ t • . ~D
~ . ' . ' _ ~ _ _ 1 N• dl . J •v, «~l,.i ' • ~
SEE . ` SEE Si
. ~
IHIS cKETCN IS Fl)RI'MNEp FOR INFUi2WTlQNAL PURNOSES
0-'-!i.Y TO kSSIST IN fi't)f'i,i;TY LCt;>>.IION. DINEfdS{ON" ARE
" r,rl' t;11- ikAIN'l i.M t;:"; MY N U~l t3E (<k.lf(_D Ua;.lN TO
r,CTER%AeNE aC(<i.:,t;L Ok 'j::;;f'E. TIIIS C:0o,:*I';.NY /,SSlliriES 140
~ LIA13ILIfY FOR LO'O'S iNCU(;IZEO [3Y ktA60W UF kELIaWCE
THEREON.
.
SPOICANE COU('J7Y TITLE COMPANY
~
32G-2626
- l ~ ~-L•~ j ~7 _ G /i-r.~ . .
' SPOKANE COUNTY pLANNING DEPARTMENT
, APPLICATIONS BEFORE TNE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF AOJUSTMENT
Certi fi cate of Exemption Appl i cation -k~r7d~ r7
~
Name of App1 i cant:
Street Address :
City: L State• • Zip Code• . Nome:
Phone.•Work 'ts....~ L.~;.
• :
Agent:
N ame o f P rope rty Owne r( s):~~,~ Ls4l~,;
i
REQ_QESTED-ACT
(Ci rcle Appropri ate Action) :
~
~ Vari.ance(s) ~ Conditional Use Permit Non-Conforming Lot/Use
Waiver of Yiolatiori Temporary Use/Strvcture Other:
*****~****~**t***************~*****t****#**'
*
* FOR STAFF USE ONLY Py
~b os/.
*Cite Ordinance Section: Old Code: ~ New Code:
t
* -5-1 Ct 4e..>r'S
*Section / 77 7ownship Range `1,5 Property Size: `
,
*Existing Zoning: F.L.U.P. Oesignation:
* • ~
*PSSA: Cy~ N U TA: ~_C N ASA: ON FIRE DIST:A. ~LEGAL .CHECKED 6Y :
*Hearing Date: m) 71'Staff taking in Applicatio►i:
*********~*~****************~*x~x~***
r '
Existing Use of Property: Describe Intended Proposal :
2,:r.1 t Q'.7. f ~o ~ 1&e`~~ ~ jaaf~Al LAW d -7 .4-6
~ . ,
%
Stre et Address of Property:
Legal Oescription of Property (Irticlude easement i f applicable):
~ t~ ~ _.~f ;`~l
. J
~i~~~~ 6 1 PP:1 ,qr`'rc.'S q-c: L/~` ~
= c
,
aj.t,
~•-Lt . ~a. t ~,,t
~
Parcel I y Source of Leyai :
Total amount of adjoining land controlled bY this owrier/sPonsor: -~14
Wh a t i r ite res t do yo u ho 1 d i n th e p rope rty :
~
Please list previous Planning Oepartment actions involving this property:
- V J ~~-a•~ ~ . ti: f ~ ~ , > ~ -
I SWEAR, UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: 1 I AM THE OWIYER OF RECOR
~ ) D OR AUTHORI-
ZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PE41ISSI0N-FROM SAID
OwNER AUTHORIZ IrIG MY ACTiONS ON HIS/HER 6EhALF IS ATTACHED; ANO (3) A1.L OF 7HE ABOVE
RESPONSES A1r0 THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF
MY YJNvwLEDuE.
• Signed:
Z2
- - Address: ;V q-L,-)r
. ~ Phone No.• ~y.-4~ p uate •
_ ~ ~
r;OTAi;Y :=11: Notary •
.
~
Date :
~9d~P~
/
A.BURDEN OF PROOF It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative.to establish the
reasons why the requested proposal should be approved and to literally put forth
the basic case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
. action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case
in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider.
Please fill the form out and return it with your application. If you didn't get a
form, ask the Planning Department pe rsonnel for advice on how to proceed.
8. SIGN-OFF SY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS
~ COUNTY HEAL7H OISTRICT
.
a) Proposed method of water supply:
~ C -
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: r
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The appli-
~ a`ant has Nnnformed of quire en s and standards. •iC2- _
~
" Signature) ~ (Date) Sign-off ai ed)
f-~ COUNTY ENGINEER' S DEPARTMENT
C~5
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal,. The appli-
cant has been informed of requirements and standards. ;
(.Si gnature ) ( Date ) i gn-off Wai ve_)
COUNTY U7ILITIES DEPARTMENT (Wai ve i f outsi de WMA ~4`'~ `~f`~`- J-
~~~~1~~~11~.~ •t~~ _ ~-c'
i
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the p`rbpAa~. The
applicant has been informed of requirements and standards.
(Signature) (.Date) (S' ntoff• Waiv~e~) ~ ~y,/.~;C
[ J The appl i cant i s requi red to di scuss the propo al wfthI
to become informed of sewage disposal requirements
and standards.
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with ~
to become informed of water system requirements and
standards.
40WATER PURVtc-YOR (',Jai ve i f outsi de CWSSA) NAME &n/5oJ1'Ja L-o Jrr,G Anoo D~s~ ~I`~
J
a) The proposal i~s-/is not located within the boundary of our future service
area.
b) The proposal is is not located within the boundary of our current district.
c) We re are not able to serve this site with adequate water.
d) Satisfactory arrangements av ave not been made to serve this proposal.
aelll~
/•z1,2/F7
7 ignature} " (Date~ (Sign-off Waived)
~
5. SE!JERAGE PURVEYOR NAME :
(If other than Spokane County)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
appl i cant has beer i nformed or requi rETents and standards.
(.Si gnaLt.ure ) (.Date ) (.Si gn-off Wai ved )
v
J '
APPLICANT'S FORM
/
NAME :
FILE:
I. VARIANCES A. Will the variance authorize a use otherwise prohibited in this zone?
Yes ; No Comnent:
B. Will special circumstances a licable to the propert (such as size,
shape, topography, surroundings when combined wihe standards of
the Zoning Ordinance, create practical difficulties for use of the
property and/or depri ve the property of ri ghts and pri vi 1eges comnon
to other properties in the vicinity and similiar zone classification?
Yes No Comment:
C. Will the granting of the variance be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the
vi ci ni ty and zone? Yes ; No Y,; Coments: ~j~,~~,~
D. Does strict application of the zoning standard create an unreasonable
burden in light of purpose to be served by the standard? Yes
No ; Cortment:
E. Would relaxation of the zoning standard make a more envirnnmentally
sensi ti ve or energy-conservi ng proj ect or encourage cont-iiiued or new
. use of an historic property? Yes ; No ; Comment: F. Nill a broader, public need or interest be served by granting verse
denying the variance? Yes No ; Comment:
.
Is the case for a variance supported by other like or similar
situations in the vicinity and in similar zones? Yes No ;
Comment:
(continued on reverse side)
.
j ,
,
H. Will granting the variance adversely affect the overall zoning design,
plan or concept for either the iRmediate area or the entire County?
Yes ; EJo X ; Comment:
1. Is the case for a variance substantially based upon a lack of
reasonable economic return or a claim that the existing structure is
too small? yes ; No ; Comment:
J. Will granting the variance be inconsistent with the general purpose
and intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes ; No Comment: _
K. Did the practical difficulty which gives rise to the variance request
exist before the property was acquired by the present owner? Yes ;
No ; Comment:
L. Will the granting of the variance result in defacto zone reclassifica-
tion; that is, the establishing of nearly all the privileges comnon to
a different zone classification? Yes ; No Comment:
.
M. Ooes the requested variance result in the circumvention of denSity
regulations designed to protect the Aquifer? Yes ; t!o ~ ;
C ornment : 0046z/Arch. 0002z 2
r° - t-- i • C- I": -f.. _ , j ~ .F . . . r. ~
~..j " i:~.. i i~ 1 I"~... . ~J I`a ~ f =J .L
r ~ ~ 1 ~ - qi, a• --:f ! +~'lC:'!._t T' .E
..:i ~ I''•. i-i 1:.. E...~ i.a i~~i 7.3 vv rt i i a. E~r 0 i a
GT
~ r;~ ° : : ;y
J
i~~ • ~ y'r Y~ C. .,F~ ~_~~~::~,J~.. r,_a._;C~~ < ~ ' ~r~~.i ~ ' ~ _~t ~ i I i. si ..3 E ff~~ . ~ i },'i ~ i ~ ~
C:" ~ f"y ~i v = r. ~ L r• k
1wr, w ~>=~cj~...~-~~,4~~ r_:c~.~. ti:~~~~ C~.f iiJ 1 ~~EE r= F:
t.:`.' ~J ~ f 'Y . i a ~ 1. f..- a c7 - % 14 _ E ; = 1 - *rt''- •
L~ ~ t 1~_. ~ i' ~ s~•i t ~ ~ , 1
14 e j 3 L:: v ey 1 ~ v J. 7'.:.~ yV d t Vi ce 1:.~ t! t.) v L: e ! , L F to r, I ! F"i !l C::i pi i..i c./ ri
i~i ii~_ •~v' •~if_.a J. mp 1, i_I i il i:Z ~ ~i ~
i E_` ALd `Y E-z, a iJ 1...i ~t.. lli Ri,.iw! R.i. e f i
PI :.ts so : C:1f"1 it V s=O {°1 Za VC:' tles l••:.~f1 i..:l cl i'c? s+t'i(.:'Lo :l.ii 'L i, 1 ,=2 [,.^r!, C1C3 c:,t'2 '_i " ~(::f=)!l(::3:! -•:I.C:) i-lt::, Ci; A p Ip r'f:iv.:.A~.
tYf.:" O_+'v' ! R .=i l..! LJ in a. t.. L? C: 'i C) t. Fi <i~ t_~ u, ~i I. J. t ~ ~i 4.J I 1 f1 • !Yi ' " . , : ~ t~~.~ ' t'' ; = T ' -iH,~ !yi;;ct_l~ '
~ t i i 1. '•::a 'i c. 4 ~i _ _3 t~ ~'i p
~ ~ • r. .j~.. i~ .~.!:.-t t_ C? Y"r 7.., L r_i ~--i r~.• Ii I ~ ~ ~ - = ~.i...~ ..I.-9e~..~3 r .y J^•~ . a :1.~. . Li. .i_
.I 1_> : i _ i»~ i _ F~t ~ ~.f : ry t ! v1~
' r~
= t' ~r ~ ~ ~~ii..i •~_i J i:: 1..1 fI i..J. ~~.i. ~ i:ti'_+`:• i
e.s e6E:.~FeCj_, ti~:?~:;~.i.~.1~!s t~--ti' h•i .i '•.:i' ~ r..) I~i`y' L? i?_.i r_ tJ 'y ~1~.h ;a r-f.t % i... 1 r, r~' - r•-~ ~ i- _ F~.. E` ~S t:t F- i,~.i. 1, rf°-:~ ~ ~
-t ~ t. . .
ED c: i i C!t. t'➢ ci i Y za rJ r) 1 rl't Ci:' F\ C i.; id :1 a i'1 t. Ci f f=a f t::: r l:. c? :=:t S vq h-~ t' h•4 V 7. t:r' W
%.i 1:7 Fi .i c» c?C t 7. % n :a " .j t :i s.; (J i Ei i 1 7 i::' 1" s: t. a rl cj J. i-1 t°~ i 1ni i .L. h (e P I : 7 i l v.j j. a. i bf? zi [JcJi' easi ssC:: cl w_4
i`) ~ i I-) c) r i=' 1 ia. i_ 1) E) 1 3. ria L :i, o ri .-i. so r.: ~:i. r-; %1 j~~ ci i ~e ---:s~ f~ t i .
r.' y r- { • I ..y ~ - • t ~ : r-~ •p• , . ~ e.._ r. ~
l.r ~ ` a. E i: . E..; ! 1. " I 1" I g~". ~ . ~t ri i ~I f:.~ _L ~ ~i C... T'~
C.'~,:;~r - 01 E..~2, 3 ;wr~,~:,.~~ i T 1~,a tc -r ~.ii~~~
..rl 1•.F~t~~}4_ i •.af'"~
l? ~_1 '
l:trl~.4!?. y wl.~ q .l. 9!'? l~l..!
T a 1 f-~ - ht°r'~.; L_ t1: f ~ ti.I.[~•F E._7 i •~t e.r I'~ "i~..~ I' ~
'F -"rL.i ,J ~ t~'~
: ~l ~ Sr"•e~_ j ~ c°a :'~t'• t: y iC~~_, ~ 1-v ~ ,
r~~ l.e '3 1~f • p r^a r~~-~: • e~ a r- i ' 1 ~ i..~..~Y ~ r~. r.., t:. E ~ ! ~ ~.~.•I ~i h!~'~
u •__i i` i_? i ~...t l ti ~ . t~- ER
F~'l
F ~1- .ir"~ r•7-7 r;• y
..:4... !iJ o V t~~~ J.`.. ~ w'•.1 f /'7 L! (J-..~~...$'''~ r-•~.lC..il Ifi i" t~rP1P f
?`l 11 c; VEl F_ i W :R C:1 t i k:.' cS i:) v 1`±T' 7 t_° I~' t°• ii E? i i c:l F.7 i. a i: :.::t t 1 f.::i T'i ~ i t! e? f:_ f, l-? f.= e: i..l s 'vyt.;' Ol ve'.`
? ~
-f..!:J i m di:tit ~ • ~ ~ ~ ' t r _
f' .9. r1' _ 'ti% t4 • _.J.i.l i ~~7 ~E ~ i. .i c-i ~ :2 ~'1i l- ~ i-. ~e ~ 3~} ~t~ ~Ai : ! y t::l ir ~l T. ~ i~_•? ,-i7
!'{7.._ C. :~..l:.li t~1 1 ~ ~ .-c.: t ~ 1~ i::1`tir-~:: • i_ ~ C~~ '~_tPl _ .._:i_~. +~;.i...!i-.. ' ' I 1_ 112 j.J .5 L'I i i i ' t_• ~_1!' '1 • f• I~.} F~r:P♦E`.'!a•::i ~ r.~.~ .
t~. r.~^..a ~~'~~:i E~ 1 L.~ t.I L.:} I 1 f.~: 7 i~1 E~ I{.a• a
~~-'T..i;.~7
4'v~(,,,-a •.:~~v~ ~~3 !_'~_la~Ti .1.' _ y;~-ti_e -•1 •~_1~'._) ti 1L: t-l..f iJf_~ . :t 4 ' i '.i.i.~_ '_:ii1 _•{('('i:L~ri3.. ~ ~ °~`.1I .i~ ' ~l7' _ ~
~ ~
- -~:_11 •r•.:;iI-~i _ jy.r° ~[_l 1"F : {
~ 1 < L` i~:rd° 7'~.r'_. t..
r~ ~_.C.tr'.~. I"~ - ~Ii:. 't~1.. rj~ e~ t'~ ~ ~"-~.77r~ Iii f_i~ ~ .~io:.~i _ L., , ~ ~ ~{~~i_Iti~..f ,_r .:r.~..1..,1 i. ~ ~ 014ri l.i '1.l.i t' t, ! . c. ~
.i I 1 c-~ ~ d_ . ~'1_c.. ~ ~~7~ c., _f 1~~..1 ~c. rl l.J ..J .:r . r
1 H; j' i p_.L (..'1 Cl c; 11 n fe 3. t~ CR t` `o P' i"I :t t:~ 1 C:1 i 1 t~ NV I.:.~ i~. ~:.:a i)`~ 11 c? I'" i._ l. Il fni 1' T~, r._ r~ .l iZ I'l
, .
W •
. L.: I i i_. , I i CL ~i c. l._1 i , i^ ~~t e:.' i"~ ~.1 c~. ~.~r 1. r_t i~~i 1.. 0 r' t l~' 0- CJ = i S.. ?-'ti E? r' E? : 7. C:' pw
r.r r: ^ r. rt t_ 2.. .f Ci i! : _.a -F 11 r- ~ i, 1 .l i ~ i~ t t;Z i 1 C~ ~ ~
.i. 7. ~ i:~ t~~ 1~ i i ig l'. c~ 'L t.. h f: F' I _ni l w a. I 1. b ia cJ cl i- Ee s s: fe' tJ ta s
l. F' .A`r. ~tl! l_ r~ p 17j I .i. C. c^t -l j. f'l r! j. f_' i i iIj 1.3 1 ' 0 t. EP c.; c_'i E? C
i a