CUE-13-93
ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEET
BLDG. PERMIT #-or -FILE# CIJE-013-
Related File # ( )
nate to Review 8-9-Y Time 9:45 # 2
Date to AA & DR Time
Date Received 7-16-93
Project Name PRIVATE DOG KENNEL 10 ADULT DOGS No. Lots No.Acres
Section - Township - Itange
SITE ADDRESS 18103 E COWLEY/W GREENACRES RD PARCEL # 18554-1419
Applicant's Name RICK & CHRIS JOHNSON Phone # 924-1769
Address 18103 E COWLEY-GREENACRES WA 99016 Work # 327-9256
Date Conditions mailed ~ Z-;`` 17\ ~
~ - r Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZONE V NO W S SCHOOL
Enguieer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name
Planning Contact Person Phone # 456-2205
Date Submitted Description Initials
,
AGRE-EMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLET'ED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIAT'ION SUBMITTED
ALTERA1'ION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS
HEARING EXAM APPROVED DENIED- APPEALED BBC APPROVED DENIED
k\p\tueview.tor
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
-CONDITIONAL USE REQUIREMENTS-
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Zoning Adjustor
FROM: Division Of Engineering & Roads 5cp'iT E•
DATE: Auqust 4, 1993
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL U8E #CUE-13-93 ~ JOHNSON* RICK & CHRIS
The Spokane County Enqineerinq Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The followinq comments are offered for inclusion in the
Findinqs and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be
approved.
E64 We have reviewed the above referenced proposal and have no comments
to make concerning the application.
♦ ~ _ • , ~
S n O K A t-z E 'C O U N T Y
, .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D HUBBARD, DIRECTOR
HG'Tff(CIE C1F OID(O)KAIYIE (COUNZI"~.Y 7LCDNffNG AIIDXUO'Il'GlR 1FU]]BILIIC
IHIIEARlING
DATE: August 9, 1993
TIME: 9:45 a. m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE: Spokane County Public Works Building
Commissioners Assembly Room
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM 2 File: CUE-13-93
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PRIVATE DOG KENNEL
LOCATION: Central Spokane valley, north of and adjacent to Cowley Avenue and
approximately 1/8th mile west of Grreenacres Road, in SE 1/4 of Section 18, Township
25N, Range 45 EWM; 18103 E. Cowley Avenue.
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests permission for a private kennel operation of no
more than 10 adult dogs. A separate kennel building is to be located north of the dwelling
incorporating all or a portion of the existing garage; possibly including an addition to the
garage. Section 14.616.240.5 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County allows this use
upon issuance of a conditional use pernut.
EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR - 3.5)
SITE SIZE: Approximately 36,800 square feet
APPLICANT: Rick & Christine Johnson
18103 E. Cowley Ave
Greenacres Wa 99016
NOTE: THE ZONING ADNSTOR WII.L ISSUE A WRITTEN DECISION TO APPROVE OR DENY
THE ABOVE PROPOSAL. ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY
APPEAL THE ZONTNG ADJUSTOR DECISION AND MiJST DO SO WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR
DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE DECISIONS SIGNING. APPEALS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
A$200.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SFOKANE
COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING, 1026 WEST BROADWAY, SPOK:ANE, WA 99260
(SECTION 14.412.042 OF THE ZONING CODE OF SPOKANE COUNTY). THE ABOVE
REFERENCED FILE MAY BE EXAMINED AT TI-iE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205
. ~ ~ CUE-13-93
\
~ . . a'
~ Q ~y
~
~.l.D1KtN ~
A - O `X. , W
~ ~ Y
W
> -
AUGUSTA 187 188 te9 190 1° 1
I 7'~ r73 174 175 t7E, , 77 178 1'19 180 18' 132 183 184 185 186 ~
~ MAXWELL Av ~~~"~~~~cs Schc
~ • (Elbrnt
Q ~tory~
~c . ax~t i U
z
J R BO0 NE
o ~
h6
• (i Q r l
~ BppN E ~5 -
- ~ -
. 50ONE E, SMET
CATALDD~
C A O AVE
~ . . 90 i NTER- STATE N I GH1KAY N°90 ~
jervice Rr
_ . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . u j 8 qt,
~.r r ~ ~ / r rJ r-1
~ r' J ~
~-K +
O ~ IPOk
'77
.
w~ L 205 m •t r ~
. ~ ' • `
'z
ST OFFI ~ - 1, LL~Y~ ~
t G
1 T(n ~ ~
M4►I 1 0
N ~ f
C 4
$
~r p ~c oo I ~
f6M PP r • • - 0
a.• a
EL .Y449 ° r °
~ 15T
~ ~ .
4K SEZO*`~p AvE
U z
2ND , .
2 nd A- ~ N
3 R o URT F O U R T H ..►'!...AVE
7tr~
, . , . ~ -
Ln
.
- J
♦
, .
J • • , .
SPOK:A.NE COUNTY PLASINING DEPARTMENT
APPLYCATIONS BEFORF, THE ZONINC AD TUSTOR
r
Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.: I. UE - 1.3
`R.% c1L L.. . SO-N
Name of Applicant: C~~~~~%A) c. L.~ Agent: N
Street Address: ws4 Cnt A v~..
~ Zip Phone - Home: OQ8
City S tate: S,,6.2 A_Code: t3~{~ Work: `S6
Agent's No.:
Name of Property Owner(s): 1k,sY, L .7~n ~.~c-► s~ ~ ns e 1.-- .!5 o~nn sQ N
S treet Address: 1o z c_a W Lf_~ F
Zip Phone - Home: 0~- V-1 (,ci
City: C'A r t- en) f_\c r e ~ State: u,.).$_Code: ~3 ~1 Q1~ Work:
REQLTESTED ACT'ION(S) (Circle appropriate action):
Variance(s) (Conditional U,se P`i;`~, Expansion of a
Other: ~ Nonconfornung Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
~ . ~ Violation/
Section 49 Township ~ Range 7 S Enforcement: Y Q
•Lot and legal checked by: •Easement legal checked by: ~0
•CWSSA Water (purveyo i, .L-odfyr• •ULID Agreement needed: Y N
•Existing zone: _UR - . Cite A plicable Section: i`1•6l~. t yG~ ~s) a»ct t y~dS! /oC 7
•Arterial Road Pl designation: It? r~~-Y •Comp. Plan desi a'
*Fire District: •Personnel doing preapp conf. -
•Other/previous Planning Departiment actions involving this pro rty: •Hearing Date: •Maint. agreement checked by:
ABOUT THE PROPERTY
•Existing use of property: _?,e=,►Ae toc e.
•Describe proposed use of the property:
~•If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance sought in comparable
teims: .
•If a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet a11 standards? ~ N.
If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y N.
•What is the size of the original parcel if this proposal is a recent or proposed division?
-Street address of property (if known): -r,-- rx~k A~)cv
•Legal description of property (include easement, if applicable):
t'Qrbt ni nQ4 r'.. rtiAC~cc w1aovai, r-, xr SIT ~=a 0, k 14
•Par'cel No(s).: oc.c rr.r-
•Source of legal: a eL~l %~.&-ko U.0 Nt
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent:
•What interest do you (applicant) hold in the properry? -Q-v) n) P.~-
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S
COUNTY OF SPOK:ANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM TF3E OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OV'ifNE.R, WRIITEN PERMISSION
FROM SAID OWNER AUTF-iORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3)
ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE
TRUT Y AND TO BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
~ LiN Signed: 4,<V1
~ Address:
~~Q ~ y01g
Phone No.: te: l
~C P c'in aa~id for the ta of Washington, residing ,
0 i., L, , y appointment expues:
AZ L~44 ) ~
~
wAS~,~1 page 1 of 2
. ' ,
, y ♦
~ • • ' I • ' .
CONDITIONAL USE PERMZT BURDEN OF PROOF ORIvi
'R 'c,t I. `SO N N~~
Na.rne: C, h r+S~ iN P L.^.
File: C&tE-13-93
VCC)NTDITiON State Law, Section 36.70.020 (7), clarifies that the County
regulaaons must specify the standards and criteria that shall be
applied in the review by the Zoning Adjustor. Additionally,
cond.ition of approval may be added to assure compatibility with
other us in the same zone.
A. Assurning the proposal is lis~ed as a"permitted" cond.itional use, do you believe the
proposal meets all of the required, established and applicable standards?
~a, L-NqPzA af~~a , ~ o. -9Q 3~_ C`~.~
0
. ~ 0:rd~ ,
B If ou cannot meet e condltiona] uses required standards, are you seeking relief by
applying for an a.drmnistrative exception or a Vanance? Yes No (Circle One)
C What have you done or could you do to:
1. Ma.ke the use compaable with other pemlitted activities in the same vicinity or
zone?
~ er-cs' A,OX_-- : _
2 Ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities?
`(\Qv 1 rv~ f.> QC (C~,~^ CSl~ N rA. 0
-T
b Expla.in how or why the proposal will not be derricnental to:
~
1. The Comprehensive Plan: ~~Q c~ t~~ ~ ~ 0 ~
and
2. Surrounding property: Q
r, IA- ~1 :2 a-E7~~1 a
E What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent
(health, safery and general we.lfare) of the Zoning Code AND mitigate any adverse
effect upon the neighbonng properties including but not limited to: 1) time iimits; 2)
front, side or rear yard greater than minimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing;
5) off-street parking; and 6) others?
dj
U
CLi', IIl.'RDF1 OF PROOF FORM
I2l: V, ! i4 l
i ~ ~ J _ -`►-Q , l - , ! ~
~ ? _ ✓ ~ t w Y ~ f ~ ► _r.,•_ ~1 - ~ ✓ - ~ 1~4 ^
• ~ i , ~ ; , k ~ _ - ~ ~ t a t
~ ! ~ ~ w • ' ~ a M 4 "E..--'~ 1 - ~ s i . - ~ ,
Y t` ~ . .+r ! - ~ ~1,.~..--' _ . ~ ~.~.r^1'"'
~ J~p - 1 + ; y • ' ` ~ ~
~ ~ ,~t... . .r•~~"'3 , . .
` ~.,._..I ' ~ 1 - 'I+
,.t-' ~.r^-'""'r.•+.
t4
1 - t Q, • - -
_ • i _ _ M~ • ~ , r~j~~~,~. _ ° - '
- ""--'3.~'"""'
~ . ~ ~ Y . 1 ~ . A~" ~
y -
~ ~ ~
~ ~ -~.,..._.._--f _...r-.
- ~ ~
~ - - - ~ _--.--l----`
~
F. s--~-
' . ""r..~--- .
.
r-
'
~ . ~ f ~•-„r F
. ~ .
~ M1 s rr ~ ~ ...r-- ~ / ` ♦
• ~ ' ~ , ~ ~
.
~
_ ~ . r~ ~ • ` ~ ~ _~-..r~'_r'--- ~
{
s
"
D
-2 baA 42-
• ~ ~ ~ I.
• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - '
- .1'- ~ +
~ wl u0 . 1 ~
' rf _r._. ~ _ i ~
~ ry ` ~
; _
,
+
~1 ~ 1 ' ► ~ _S__~ __t_---s' ' '
- - I . , ~
1 • . . - ~
•r '
.
t
SPOK:ANE COLf NTY PLANNING DEPART1VENT
P LI ATION BE
Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.:
'R.i c1L L- . 'SUbk so-IQ
Na.me of Applicant: Agent: Y N
Street Address: A-<,-4 r, otAet A v e.
Zip Phone - Home: Ov,-~~
City; S tate: S.bA-Code: ~qOAo1Work:
Agent's No.:
Name of Property Owner(s): JK,5Y,. L.f -Zo)a~n 4- r,~m c- tsa i ru e L. "S ohn sQ N
S treet Address: r--.1 161d a c' o W L.~Y kQ F
Zip Phone - Home: QZt-k- \`l Lcj
Ciry: C`q- p P rU sc reS State: u j A Code: ~3,gQlo Work: _~Bci- jG.~
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action):
Variance(s) (Cond.itional U,se Pe~tj Expansion of a
, p~er; ~ Nonconforming Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Violation/
Section Township Range Enforcement: Y N
•Lot and legal checked by: •Easement legal checked by:
•CWSSA Water (purveyor): -PULID Agreement needed: Y N
•Existing zone: Cite Applicable Sectionf
eArterial Road Plan designation: •Comp. Plan designation
•Fire District: •Personnel doing preapp conf.:
•Other/previous Planning Department actions involvi.ng this property: '
•Hearing Date: •Maint. agreement checked by:
,
ABOUT THE PROPERTY
•Exisring use of property:
•Describe proposed use of the property: _~~~d,~ ~ ~ ~ a...1 ~~-1►. ~ r,~w-~ e 1LP In A~
~(•If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance sought in comparable
terms:
-If a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards? (t N.
If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y N.
•What is the size of the original parcel if this proposal is a recent or proposeti division?
•Street address of property (if known): ~~a ~!jntws ~ nc, m_L~j.. Aom
•Legal description of property (include easement, if applicable): I
C ar1Dt nI tcka e-rt AC C4 N.wl lnor+ mXP 4im lca ~4-%LA
•PatCel NO(S).: ts _cT 1% L-l . 1L-k tcA c_ c,r re. rv
•Source of legal: -t' aX.
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent:
•What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? mp,r
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM TFE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AU'THORIZED AGENT FOR T'HE PROPOSED STTE; (2) IF NOT THE OVVNER, VV.'RITTEN PERMISSION
FROM SAID OV'VNER AUTHORIZING MY ACfIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3)
ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTIlNG DOC'iTMENTS ARE MADE
TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
Signed: .
Address:
-Phone No.: Date:
NOTARY SEAL: .
Notary Public in and for the state of Was*gton, resid.ing at
. My appointment expires:
page 1 of 2
.4 ti • . 1
~ •
A. BURDEN OF PROOF
It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the
REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor
of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which
addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return
it with your application.
B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRIC
Proposed method of water supply: l/ b) Proposed method of sewage disposal:
i
A preliminary consultation has been held to disc the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of uirement d s dards~/ 3
~
S'gnature) ~ ' (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
.2. SPOKA E CO TY GINEE NG DEPARTMENT
A prelimin consu ' n h~ been held t discuss the proposal. The applicant
has been ' ed uire nts and s dards.
~ qo.,~ -
(Signature) (Da ) (Sign-off Waived)
. ,
SPOKA.N/CNTY UTILITIES DEPART1ViENT (Planning Department may waive
if outside VV'V~JMA
)
A prelimin ary tion has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of requiremenandards. ~
% `(gignature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Planning?)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of water system
requirements and standards. (See #4 below). '
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards. (See #5 below)
WATER PURVEYOR:
~a) The proposal isfis not located within the boundary of our future service area.
b) The proposal isfis not located within the boundary of our current district.
c) We able to serve this site with adequate water.
d) Satisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to serve this proposal. (Signature) (Date)
. SEWERAGE PURVEYOR:
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of requirements and standards.
(Sigciature) (Date)
- ~
. , .
. - Y , i • , .
' .
' . =u
♦ • • • , • 9 •
s - Y page 2 of 2 ,
za; aPP ,
xEv: 1191
, .
ZONING ADJUSI'OR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMZT FOR A PRIVATE DOG ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
KENNEL ) CONCLUSIUNS,
FILE: CUE-13-93" ) AND DECISION
APPLICANT: RICK & CHIZYSTINE )
JOHNSON )
COMPANION FILE(S): NQNE )
PARCEL NUMBER: 55184.1419 )
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to continue a kennel
operation to house no more than 10 adult dogs. Authority to consider such a request
exists pursuant to section 14.404.100 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County and Spokane
County Board of County Commissloners resolution No. 89 0708, as may be amended.
PRO,TECT LOCATION: Central Spokane valley, north of and adjacent to Cowley Avenue
and approximately 1/8th mile west of Greenacres Road, in SE 1/4 of Section 18, Township
25N, Range 45 EWM; 18103 E. Cowley Avenue.
OPPONENTS OF RECORD:
Warren C. and Audrey L. Hood
PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available l,iformation
on file, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the public heanng held
on August 9, 1993, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a wntten decision on September 23, 1993 to
APPROVE the applicaaon.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Testimony was taken under oath.
2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained ln the file;
more particularly, the dogs are kept in the house most of the time and use the exercise yard
generally only under supervision. There are two outside enclosed kennel runs in addition to
the large fenced back yard. The large exercise area is screened from the street by solid wood
fencing and screened from the neighbors to the east with portable chain lrnk fencing wlth sight
obscuring matenal on the fencing material. The possibility of expanding and including an
exercise area to the rear of the present garage exists. The rear, northerly, most ponion of the
property is pasture area. Refer to site plan indicated as "approved site plan."
3. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the
proposal as Urban. The proposal is generally consistent with Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan and complies with RCW 36.70.450.
4. The site is zoned UR-3.5, which al.lows the proposed use upon approval of this
application.
i -
F
5
CASE NO. CUE-13-93 SPQKANE CQUNTY'ZCl~ING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2
5. The existing land uses in the area of tl7i-, proposal irrclude residenrial uses on lots
fram about 2 ac-res ta abaut 1/3 0f an acre. TypicaLly, uses listed as a conditiana] use a-re
assumed as permitted in the underlying zo-ne, subject ta the listed standards and any other
conditions needed to assure compatiblllty in the glven instance. But, ptLrsuai1t to 14. 404,101,
the requested condhtional use perrnit may be denied rf tht I-Iearing Body cannot find thai the
requeste,d use will be compatible with other pe]-r-nitted uses. Sectlon 14 616.240.5 lists certain
standards to acliieve compatibility, some, of which the Heanng Body may exercist nomunal
discretian over ta achieve the vverall intent of compatibility ruith surraundi,ng properties.
CIearly, 14.404.102 allows the Heanng Body to impo~e any and all t7ianntr of additional
conditYons and zequizements in an effort to achieve n»cimum cornpatzbility. In the instant
situatian the applacant daes not baard other dogs than her own and does not commercially
breed or grooin dogso Her custom is to keep the dogs in the house at night and to r7ot 1et them
bark f,xcessively, The dags axe also in the house at tiiiies at wliach the applicaalts are nor at
home. Waste is contaxned in plastic bags, and apparentl}r cleaned up on a regular basis. Waste
is then hauled off v4rith garbage. The dogs aare seldan7 outs1de in large numbers. There usually
let ouL a6aut 9:00 a.rrx, in thr- moming and are brought lIl the ecilly to I171ddlc cVeI11l1g, with a
late eveninglshon outing for waste elinitnanon puiposes. The applicarit breeds the dogs
infreq-uently, approximatel}r once evtry 3 yeaurs, with the pui-pase of breeding primarily to
develop additioiial show dogs and not for the puxposes of salc:
6. The proposal is exempt frona the provisiotis of the Washington State Envlranmenta1
Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW, pursuant to WAC 197-11-$00 (1) (1) (iii) and the Spokane
Environinental Ordinance 11 10.070 (1) (c).
7. BOth adverSe and 5upportive t~stiniony or wriLter7 comi-izeniS urere received
regarding the propasal. Nancy Satin, Spokane County Small Animal Conrrol, said that they
had no baxlang mmplaints of record and that the k(-,nnel met ail cheir cntena for a pnvate
kennel. Dolores Nichols, residing iirimedlately adaacerit to the west, supported the applicatian,
saying the appllcants had maintained a sin-alar kennel facility fiar more than 10 years, without
adverse affects. She stated rnany people in the area wCre unaware- that the nurnber of dogs
-resxded at the residence as apparently do An adverse comrneiit letter was rrcelved f-am the
Hoc)ds, 11v1ng in Arizona. The Hoods own rental prapertY, aPparently aeross rhe street and to
the urest. They expressed coneem for a kennel in the area as beirlg dlsrupave and cxeafing
obnoxiaus and distracting noise. The Hoods are apparently unaware that the 4cennel has
existed for over 10 yeaxs and that it has not had any compWints against it. The Hoods did not
describe any specif~c knovvn violations ar ciiscuss any exist1ng problems assocpated with the
applicant`s kennel,
8. "T'he proposal is listed in the Zoning Code of Spokane County as acanditional use
allowed 1n the 14.616.240.5 zone, and the proposal does meet the established a.nd applicable
critezia described far that conditianal use.
9. The proposal does not impose exeessive demands ora public utilities.
10. The applicant has been made aware of the recomrx~endabons of vanous County
agencies reviewing this projeef and has indxcateci t.hos~ recorxmendations are acceptable,
11. The Zomng Adjustor may require such condinans of approval as necessary and
appropnate to malce the project mast campatible with the public interest and general welfare.
CUIE. 13.93
. • -
CASE NO. CUE-13-93 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3
12. Various performance standards and critena are additionally needed to make the use
compatible with other pernutted acnvifies in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against
imposing excessive demands upon public utilities, and these shall be addxessed as conditions
of approval.
13. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the 7oning
Adjustor of Spokane County have been met.
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor
APPROVES the proposal, subject to compliance with the following
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. GENERAL
1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, and shall not run with the
land.
2. Failure to comply with any of the coriditions of approval contalned in this decislon,
except as rnay be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violahon of the Zoning
Code for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropriate.
3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make rrunor adjustments to site plans or
the conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zoning Adjustor to be within the context of
the original decision.
II. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The proposal shall comply with all applicable standards of section 14 616 240.5 of
the Zoning Code of Spokane County unless deviations, variances or exceptions have been
lawfully granted.
2. This permit expires on October l, 1995, unless renewed under the following terms.
a. Approximately 30-45 days pnor to expiration of this perniit, the applicant may
apply for an extension of the permit or establishment as a perpetual pernlit (for the
applicant only).
b. Such fees as required at the dme shall be collected by the Department at
renewal. I
c. A search of the records of complaints will be undertaken to see if existence of
complaints and/or violation of the standards of conditions exist.
CiJE-13-93
CASE NO. CUE-13-93 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4
d. Prior to October 1, 1994, the issue of the drainfield, raised 1n the Health Dismct
memo of 8/9/93 (item 3.d.) must be resolved (See V.4. below).
3. The applicant shall generally comply with the "approved site plan; 8/23/93, tgm."
This allows for a future kennel expansion for an exercise area to the north, northeasc, and east
of the present garage. In the interim, the applicant may establish a sight obscunng fencing
paralleling the east property line in the area between the house and the pasture, which will
assure sight obscuring fencing at least 50 feet from the residents ro the east.
4. The applicant shall generally maintain the same kennel operation as descnbed under
the findings of fact /conclusions 2 and 4. Any complaints of barking may be dealt with by
requiring additional sight obscuring fencing and requinng the consiruction of accoustically
accurate kennels coplying with WAC 173-60.
5. Any signs erected on the applicant's property shall ilot exceed 2 feet by 2 feet in
size and shall not be illuminated.
6. If the Zonrng Adjustor believes there are extenuating cu-cumstances associated with
the renewal of the permit, he/she may cause there to be a public hearing and reconsideration of
the pernut; the notification expense shall be that of the county if such reconsideration takes
place.
III. DEPARTMENT OF BUxLDYNGS
1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Bulldings at the earliest possible stage
of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements adnunistered/enforced as
authonzed by the State Building Code Act. Deslgn/development concerns include. Fue
Apparatus Access Roads; Fire Hydrant/Flow; Approved Water Systems: Building
Accessibility; Construction Type; Occupancy Classification; Exiring, Exterior Wall Protecaon;
and Energy Code Regulations.
V. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Du-ector of Ualiaes,
Spokane County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utillaes, Spokane
County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of pernuts by the health
officer, the use of (an) individual on-site sewage disposal system(s) may be authorized.
NOTE: The District has no record of an approved on site disposal system.
This issue should be resolved to the satisfaction of the District.
cuE-i 3-93
-
CASE NO. CUE-13-93 SPOKANE COUNTX ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 5
5. The applicant assumes responsibility for the provision of domestic-use water.
6. The Spokane County Health Distxict's Rules and Regulations for Solid Waste
Management and Handling address the disposal of wastes from animals in the following ways:
Secrion 1.06.200 (2) (h-i) On-Slte StoraLye, Collection and TransPortaaon Standards for
Solid Waste.
h. Disposal of wastes from household pets may be by burial, to the sanitary sewer
system if acceptable to the sewer operating enrity, into a tied bag for collecaon as
garbage, or by other methods as approved by the Dismct.
i. On-site storage and disposal of solid wastes from animal kennels, shelters, or
stables shall conforni to the standards of this SectYon, and Sections 1.06.300 and
.420, as applicable.
j. Animal wastes shall not be collected, deposited, or allowed to remain in any place
to the prejudice of other persons as described in RCW 7.48.140. (1).
In regards to the wash-down waste water from cleaning the pen areas, there are no
Spokane County Health District permits required for its disposal. Consult with the Department
of Ecology for this generated waste water disposal. The kenne] should be operated and
mainta.ined in a manner so as to not create a nuisance.
VI. DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
None is needed.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH
NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE
RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEA.L PERIOD.
HOVVEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND
INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS
OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON A.PPEAL.
DATED this& daY of SePtember, 1993
- O . OSHER, AICP
ning jus[or
Spok e Coun , Washington
CUE-13-93
.
CASE NO. CUE-13-93 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 6
FILED:
1) Applicant (CertifiecuReturn Receipt Mail)
2) Opponents of Record
3) Spokane Division of Engineering and Roads
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Division of Utilities
6) Spokane County Department of Buildings
7) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronlc File
NOTE: ONLY THE A.PPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN
A.PPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE QF SIGNING.
APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANI.ED BY A$200.00 FILING FEE. APPEALS MAY BE
FILED AT TI-E SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING, 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Secnon
14.412.042 of the Zoning Code for Spokane County).
CUE-13-93