CUE-4-90
~ • ~ y il ~ t .
~ As,ti.` i t-14 Y
1990
~
N(~'1'I('1: OF lif:Ak1N(; -~~a: ~':'►f;;,•;,, r ,
, i' tIL•• j e',:", a
SI'UKANE C()UN'I'ti' 110AFtI) ()F ;uAMay 16.1990
1'1 Ni w:: 9:00 a.m.
PLACE: Spokanc County Planning Department 21ld Floor Hcaring Room. Bro:+dway Cencrc Buildin6
North 721 ]cffcrson Scrcct Spokanc, WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
F1LES: VS-97A-83 AND VE-18A-89 ~
RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT'S DEC1SlON DATED
JANUARY 17, 1990 DENYING A CHANCE OF CONDITIONS TO VS-47-83 A N D
VE-18-89 FOR AN AIRPARK.
. Location: Gcncrally locatcd north of and adjaccnt to, and south of and adjaccnt to, 44th
Avenuc. bctwacn Canklin and Chapman Roads, in thc SE 1/4 of Section 36, Township 25,
Rangc 44 EWM, and thc SE 1/4 of Section l, Township 24 N., Rangc 44 EWM, Spokanc
County, Washington.
Thc Boani will reconsidcr its decision based upon thc transcript and file fmm thc Dcccmbcr 20,
1989 hcaring. Whilc intcrestcd pcwns are cncouraged to actend, no tcstimony will bc takcn.
Existing z,oning: Agricultural(Fitzpatrick propcrty), Unclassified (Airpark).
Comprchcnsivc Plan dcsignation: Rural
Sitc siu: Appmximatcly 100.14 acres • Applicant MELVIN FI'CZPATRICK •
East 1680144th Avcnue • Grecnacres, WA 99037
,
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
FI LE: CUE-4-90
AI'PEAG QF THE ZONYNG ADJUSTOR'S APRIL 4, 1990 DECISION APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DUPLEX IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE.
Location: Gcnerally locatcd at the nonhcast corner of thc intcrsection of Barker Road and 8th
Avenuc in thc NW 1J4 of Scction 20, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM. Spokanc County,
Washington.
Public Information: Filc CUE4-90 and thc Zonins Adjustor's dccision dated Apcil
4, 1990 arc availablc for public inspcction at the Spokane County Planning
Dcpartmcnt, North 721 Jcffcrson Scrcct, Spokanc. WA.
• ~
110Akl) ()F AUJUtiI'MHN1' N()T1Ch: ()F IWAftING-MAY 16, 1990 I'A(:F: 2
Cxistinb zonin6: ASricultur:tl
Coinpnchensivc Plan desibnation: Urban
Sitc sizc: Approximatcly 20,000 squarc fcct.
Applicant: DAVlD WEATHERS East 18721 8th Avcnuc
Grccnacrts, WA 99037
Zoning Ordinancc provisions: Scction 4.44.170(ii), 4.24.540 (Conditional Ust Standards) and 4.25.030(a).
Compnhcnsivt Plan provisions:
Scction 1(Urban catcgory), Scc6on 14 (Urban Impact Ana), Scction 21 (Transportation)
SEPA statcmcnt; Thc proposal is cxcmpt from thc provisions of thc Washington Statc
Environmcntal Policy Act. Chaptcr 43.21 C RCW. and thc Spokanc County Envinonmcntal
Ord.inancc. Scction 11.20.070(a).
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION:
Thc appcllant wishcs to contcst thc Conditional Usc approval on thc basis that thcrc was
inadequatc noticc to prepanc an adequatc pctition against thc application. Thc appcllant also
asscrts that thc Comprehcnsivc Plan (no uction specificd) was not considcrcd in its cntirety
as it rclates to thc subject sitc and surrounding arca.
CASE BEFORE THE BOARD: CUE-4-90
Aftcr conducting a public hcaring on Much 14,1990, thc Spokanc County Zoning Adjustor
rcndcred a writtcn dccision on Apri14,1990 appmving a rcqucst far a Cond.itional Usc Pcnnit for .
a duFlcx in thc Agricultural zonc (CUE4-90). Thc Zoning Adjustor appravcd thc docision bascd •
priaiarily on thc following findings of fact_ •
,
' ~ ted Spokane Gounty Compr~ehcnsivc Plan dcsignates thc arca of thc proposal as
U~ dit l i c s v v it h i n t h e U r b a n I m p a c t A z c a. T h c p r o p o s c d u s c i s c o n s is t c n t wn t h t h is
catcgory in that thc dcnsity guidclincs for residcntial usc arc highcst in thc Urban Catcgory.
Thc Urban Category anticipatcs aensitics substantiaUy grcatcs than those curncntly
Proposad. The Urban Category promotes the infilling af residcntial developmcnt and thc
provision of a br-oad range of public services and facilides.
• The existing Iand uses in the area of the proposal include predominantly singlc-family
residences on both smaller parcels and acreage tracts. These appear gencrally compatible
with thc proposal. There is substantial opcn spacc and farm animal kecping in thc arca •
which must be recognized by owners of the propeny and which can be incorporatcd as
conditions of approval.
• Thc Zoning Adjustor notcs that thc applicants must bc ablc to tcly on thc Comprchcnsivc
Plan and official rtgulations in purchasing or devcloping propcrty. Whcct agcncics raisc
specifie concerns about the impact of a proposal, condicions may be attached to resolve
those issues.
• Tlie subject site is scheduled to cross ovcr to thc Urban Residential 3.5 zonc on Janulry 1,
1991, at which time the Proposed duPlCx would be perniitted outrisht because duplcxes are
ullowed uses witfi 20,(X)() squ:irc fCet ot lot arca in thc Urban kesidcntial 3.5 Zonc.
it<)Altt) t)H A!)JUtiTMl;N?' N()1'i('i: t)F IiN:AFt[N(:•M/1Y 161 1991) 1'AG F. 3
• Thc Zonins Adjustor notcs funher that tliis- arca is at an intcrsccUOn of two County
Artcrials. 8th Avcnuc and Barkcr Road. Thc traffic incncasc from this projcct will bc
insignificant as comparcd to thc ovcrall traffic volumcs at this intcrsoction. Additionally,
thc proposcd saructures havc been oriented to provide for cvcntual improvcmcnts of thcu
rights-of-way whcn dccmcd appropriatc by thc Board of County Commissioncrs and
County Enginccrs.
- Thc appcal is basod upon thc oontcntion that thc County did not givc cnough notivc for thc
formulation of prapcr opposition to thc Conditional Usc Pcrntit. Thc propcr lcgal rcquircmcnts for
advcrrising thc hcaring bcforc thc Zoning Adjustor of Spokanc County. howcvcr. wcrc mct by thc
Conditional Usc Pcnnit applicant.
As mentioncd in thc Cau Bcforc thc Board, thc nature of thc Comprchcnsivc Plan omissions in thc
dccision making proccss of thc Zoning Adjustor were not discloscd in thc writtcn appcal and
thereforc will havc to be heard at the hearing.
fcu
CUE~4~90
. . ~
1 11:7 N
~.<< r
2 L .103 ' ~
~ . .
~
• ~ . _ I ~ W A
T '
Of F I
. • ' . - `.t .
~ t Av ~
c • ♦ -
00
/►'r ~ _ ~ •
.
PV : • a . i '
.
. .
SPAi
0
~ r • •
~ O
s 1ST
jN0 LY SE;O^4 O A~E
2•~Iw . + +
• A , ~ N •
~
V T V ~ ~ F ov~a T., /~VE `
MICAViE
~
~ ~ d •
♦
V
vti•
E I G H T N Av E
. • s~ ~ ~ ~
a~
~N E~
< o
O '
aC
ar
Oc ~
< r, ~
t~ •
a
1
n
- - - - - - - . , ~ .n C• _ 1
. ' • - - -
~
~
- • ,
1 • 1000
~ ~ J
~
~ } .
s 0097 GM
V Ego . . • - ~ ! .~Y _ - - .
_ o -
~
40 ~ O l
Av a
T; f1 _ . . _ - .c ►
~ ~ -
~ -
~ ~ .
~
, .
. 36•
. ,
. .
1 • ,~a„~
• ~ ~ . • , C` ~
U~
:
~
, •
. ~ r►41h ~ '
. .
R,44 EWM i
~ -
44 tWM . .
~ .
i~ '
.
. .
1.
~ .
.s • Q ~
.00
S '
. ~
,
<
4 • ~ Y
• ^ ,
• ~ ` 1
, ` • .
{
~
.
I ~ ~ ~ ~:144d , ~
.
~ _ _ .
, .
~
~
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR A DUPLEX IN THE ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
AGRICULTURAL ZONE ) CONCLUSIONS,
[CUE-4-90] LARRY DIERKS ) DECISION AND ORDER
COMPANION FILES: SP-579-89 )
PARCEL NUMBER: 20552-0264
DESCRIPTION:
This matter, being an appeal of an action by the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor, approving
the Conditional Use Permit for a Duplex in the Agricultural Zone and the Board of Adjustment,
hereinafter referred to as the "Board", having held a public hearing on May 16, 1990, and
having fully considered all tesrimony, as well as, all the contents of File No. CUE-4-90, does
hereby make the following:
PROJECT LOCATION:
. The proposal is generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Barker Road and
_ Eighth Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25N, Range 45EWM Spokane County,
Washington.
OPPONENTS OF RECORD:
, 1. James E. Rouet 2. James & Maxine Crigger
3. I?iana Thelen 4. Mary Hansen
5. Lyle & Elaine McKibbin 6. Lonnie Benn
7. Bonnie & David Weathers 8. Jim & Linda
PUBLIC HEARING:
After consideration of all available information on file, exhibits submitted and testimony
received during the course of the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor public hearing on March
14, 1990, and rendered a written decision on April 4, 1990, approving the Conditional Use
Permit.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The applicant is requesting permission to erect a duplex in the Agricultural Zone.
Sections 4.04.170 (ii) and 4.24.540 of the Spokane County Zoning ordinance allows this use in
the Agricultural Zone with a Conditional Use Permit. Authority to consider such a request exists
pursuant to Section 4.25 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
42 The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the
proposal as Urban and it lies within the Urban Impact Area. The proposed use is consistent '
with this category in that the density guidelines for residential use are highest in the Urban
Category. The Urban Category anticipates densities substantially greater than those currently
proposed. The Urban Category promotes the infilling of residential development and the
provision of a broad range of public services and facilities.
3. The site is zoned Agricultural, which allows the proposed use upon approval of this
applicarion. The applicant has demonstrated that all requirements set forth in 4.24.540 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance can be complied with in the proposal.
~
CASE NO. CUE-4-90 SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PAGE 2
4. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include predominantly single
family residences on both smaller parcels and acreage tracts. These appear generally
compatible with the proposal. There is substantial open space and farm animal keeping in the
area which must be recognized by owners of the property and which can be incorporated as
conditions of approval.
5. The Board notes that the applicants have vested rights and must be able to rely on
the Comprehensive Plan and official regulaaons now in effect in purchasing or developing
property. Where agencies raise specific concerns about the impact of a proposal, conditions
may be attached to resolve those issues.
6. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various County
agencies reviewing this project and has indicated those recommendations are acceptable. No
adverse comments or concerns have been raised by any reviewing agency.
7. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act, Chapter 43.21 C RCW and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance Section
11.20.070 (a).
8. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Board of
Spokane County have been met.
9. Considerable adverse testimony and written comments were received regarding the
proposal. The chief concern was that the proposed use would introduce a high density pattern
of development into the area, inconsistent with the established residential character. A number
. of people also felt that the traffic increase to the area from the project would create safery
problems.
. 10. Residents of nearby subdivisions indicated their property has covenants against the
- development of duplexes. The Board notes the subject property is not bound by these
covenants. Short Plat 579-89 of which the proposal is a part also has no restrictions on the
development of duplexes.
11. The Board notes that the property was formally subdivided into two lots, (See
County Short Plat 579-89), and that the lot in question meets all subdivision requirements for
development.
, 12. The subject site is scheduled to crossover to the Urban Residenria13.5 zone on
January 1, 1991, at which rime the proposed duplex would be permitted outright because
duplexes are allowed uses with 20,000 square feet of lot area in the Urban Residential 3.5 .
Zone.
13. The Board notes further that this area is at an intersection of two County Arterials,
8th Avenue and Barker Road. The traffic increase from this project will be insignificant as
compared to the overall rraffic volumes at this intersection. Additionally, the proposed
structures have been oriented to provide for eventual improvements of these rights-of-way
when deemed appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners and County Engineers.
.
CASE NO. CUE-4-90 SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PAGE 3
~
14. The Board concludes that based upon Zoning Ordinance standards, Comprehensive
Plan guidelines of both the Urban designation and Urban Impact Area Boundary and adjacent
arterials that the project wan-ants approval.
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Board APPROVES the
proposal, and adopts the Findings and conclusions of the Zoning Adjustor and the following:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in interest
and shall run with the land.
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The site be developed as shown on the site plan and described in the public hearing.
. 2. Building setbacks shall be measured from the Future Acquisition Area for County
Arterials as shown on the final plat of SP-579-89.
_ 3. The owners, successors in interest recognize that the proposal is located in an area
where agricultui-al activiries and farm animals have been established.
II. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY
1. The issuance of a building pernut by the Department of Building and Safety is
required.
2. Requirements of Fire District No. 1 need to be satisfied during the building permit
process.
III. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorizaaon is conditioned on
compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further .
conditioned and subject to specific applicarion approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
2. The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petieon method pursuant to RCW 36.94
which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a
protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW
Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not
CASE NO. CUE-4-90 SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PAGE 4
prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objecaon to any assessment(s) on the property as a
result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition
or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
4. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connecdon to future areawide
collecrion systems.
IV. HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services.
2. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health
officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system(s) may be authorized.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH
NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMTT ISSUANCE, PERMITS CAN BE
RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD.
HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND
1NCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS
OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UFON APPEAL.
Vote 4-0 Unanimous.
gglk
DATED this2Qth day of June, 1990.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
OF SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON
Martin Hibbs, Chairman ' ~
,
E. B. Hamblin
Paul Eichin
,
CASE NO. CUE-4-90 SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT PAGE 5
,
-
- Dwight Hu e /
FTLED:
1) Applicant (CerrifiedlReturn Receipt Mail)
2) Parties of Record
3) Spokane County Engineer's Office
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Utilities Department
6) Spokane County Department of Building & Safety
7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
8) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File
. NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPFONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN
APPEAL WIT'I-UNN TEN (10) GALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING.
APPEAL NiLJST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT
THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTIVIENT, BROADWAY CENTRE
' BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Secrions
4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance).
<
ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASIiINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL )
USE PERMIT FOR A DUPLEX IN THE ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
AGRICULTURAL ZONE ) CONCLUSIONS,
[CUE-4-90] LARRY DIERKS ) DECISION AND ORDER
COMPANION FILES: SP-579-89 )
PARCEL NUMBER: 20552-0264
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting permission to erect a
duplex in the Agricultural Zone. Sections 4.04.170 (ii) and 4.24.540 of the Spokane County
Zoning Qrdinance allows this use in the Agricultural Zone with a Conditional Use Permit.
Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to Section 4.25 of the Spokane County
Zoning Ord.inance.
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Barker
Road and Eighth Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Section 20, Township 25N, Range 45EWM Spokane
County, Washington.
OPPONENTS OF RECORD:
1. James E. Rouet 2. James & Maxine Crigger
3. Diana Thelen 4. Mary Hansen
5. Lyle & Elaine McKibbin 6. Lonnie Benn
7. Bonnie & David Weathers 8. Jim & Linda Erickson
. PUBLIC HEARING:
After consideration of all available infonnation on fi1e, exhibits subinitted and testimony
received during the course of the public hearing held on March 14, 1990, and the Zoning
Adjustor rendered a written decision on Apri14, 1990.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposal is described above.
2. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the
proposal as Urban and it lies within the Urban Impact Area. The proposed use is consistent
with this category in that the density guidelines for residential use are highest in the Urban
Category. The Urban Category anticipates densities substanrially greater than those currently
proposed. The Urban Category promotes the infilling of residential development and the
provision of a broad range of public services and facilities.
3. The site is zoned Agricultural, which allows the proposed use upon approval of this •
application. The applicant has demonstrated that all requirements set forth in 4.24.540 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance can be complieti with in the proposal.
4. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include predominantly single
family residences on both smaller parcels and acreage tracts. These appear generally
compatible with the proposal. There is substantial open space and farm animal keeping in the
area which must be recognized by owners of the property and which can be incorporated as
conditions of approval.
CASE NO. CUE-4-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2
m
5. The Zoning Adjustor notes that the applicants must be able to rely on the
Comprehensive Plan and official regulations in purchasing or developing property. Where
agencies raise specific concerns about the impact of a proposal, conditions may be attached to
resolve those issues.
6. The applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various County
agencies reviewing this project and has indicated those recommendations are acceptable. No
adverse comments or concerns have been raised by any reviewing agency.
7. The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance Section
11.20.070 (a).
8. The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning
Adjustor of Spokane County have been met.
9. Considerable adverse testimony and written comments were received regarding the
proposal. The chief concern was that the proposed use would introduce a high density pattern
of development into the area, inconsistent with the established residential character. A number
of people also felt that the waffic increase to the area from the project would cneate safety
problems.
10. Residents of nearby subdivisions ind.icated their property has covenants against the
_ development of duplexes. The Zoning Adjustor notes the subject property is not bound by
' these covenants. Short Plat 579-89 of which the proposal is a part also has no restrictions on
the development of duplexes.
11. The Zoning Adjustor notes that the property was formally subdivided into two lots,
(See County Short Plat 579-89), and that the lot in question meets all subdivision requirements
for development.
12. The subject site is scheduled to crossover to the Urban Residential 3.5 zone on
January 1, 1991, at which time the proposed duplex would be permitted outright because
duplexes are allowed uses with 20,000 square feet of lot area in the Urban Residenrial 3.5
Zone.
13. The Zoning Adjustor notes further that this area is at an intersection of two County
Arterials, 8th Avenue and Barker Road. The traffic increase from this project will be
insignificant as compared to the overall traffic volumes at this intersection. Additionally, the
proposed structures have been oriented to provide for eventual improvements of these rights-
of-way when deemed appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners and County
'
Engineers.
14. The Zoning Adjustor concludes that based upon Zoning Ordinance standards,
Comprehensive Plan guidelines of both the Urban designation and Urban Impact Area
Boundary and adjacent arterials that the project warrants approval.
~
CASE NO. CUE-4-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ZOIVING ADJUSTOR PAGE 3
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES
the proposal, subject to compliance with the following
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in interest
and shall run with the land.
1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The site be developed as shown on the site plan and described in the public hearing.
2. Building setbacks shall be measured from the Future Acquisition Area for County
Arterials as shown on the final plat of SP-579-89.
3. The owners, successors in interest recognize that the proposal is located in an area
where agricultural activities and farm animals have been established.
II. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & SAFETY
1. The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Building and Safety is
required.
2. Requirements of Fire District No. 1 need to be satisfied during the building permit
process.
III. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on
compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further
conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of pernuts by the Health
DistricG
2. The Owner(s) ar Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94
which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the fonnation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW
Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not
prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a
result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition
or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94.
.
CASE NO. CUE-4-90 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
4. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future areawide
collection systems.
IV. HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & Health Services.
2. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health
officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system(s) may be authorized.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH
NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS CAN BE
RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD.
HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND
INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE A.PPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS
OVERTUR.NED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL.
DATED this 4th day of April, 1990.
D GLAS S.'ADAMS
ning Adjustor
Spokane County, Washington
FILED:
1) Applicant (CertifiedlReturn Receipt Mail)
2) Parties of Record
3) Spokane County Engineer's Office
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Utilities Department
6) Spokane County Deparnnent of Building & Safety
7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
8) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File
NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN
APPEAL WITHIlN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING.
APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPA1vIED BY A$100.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT
THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE
BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Sections
4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance).
1
a .
; -
~ ay (t~~ 4
NAY ~ •
1 ~ 1990
r ;
^hlY r
Nt)Tl(A: ()N Iil:Aft1N(;
SIIUKANE CUUN't'Y ItOARl) UF ;1),)1JS-rM1.-
May 16, 1990
7'1 9:00 a.m.
PLACE: Spokanc County Planning Departrnent 2nd Floor Hcaring Room, Broadway Cencrc I3uildinb
North 721 Jcffcrson Strcct
Spokanc,WA 99260
AGENDA. ITEM NO. 1
FILES: VS-97A•$3 AND VE-18A-89
RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUST'MENT'S DECISION DATED
JAPIUARY 17, 1990 DENYING A CNANGE OF CONDITIONS TO YS•97-83 A N D
VE-18•89 FOR AN AIRPARK.
. Location: Gcncrally lacatcd north of and adjaccnt to, and south of and adjaccnt to, 44th
Avcnuc, bCtwoen Conklin and Chapman Roads, in thc SE 1 j4 of Scction 36, Township 25,
Rangc 44 EWM, and thc SE 1/4 of Section l, Township 24 N., Rangc 44 EWM, Sgokanc
County, Washington.
Thc Board will rooonsidcr its dccision based upon thc transcript and file from thc Deccmbcr 20,
19$9 hcaring. Whilc intcrestcd pcrsans are cncouraged to attend, no tcstimony will bc takcn.
Existing i,oning: Agricultural (Fitzparrick property), Unclassifie.d (Airpark).
Comprchcnsivc Plan dcsignation: Rural
Sitc sizc: Approxima.tcly 100.14 acres •
- Applicanr. MELVIN FITZPATRICK •
East 1680144th Avcnue , Cmcnacres, WA 99037 .
AGENDA ITEM N0.2 ,
FI LE: CUE•4-90
Ai'PEAG OE THE Z4NING AD,IUST'OR'S APRI[. 49 1990 DECISION APPROVING A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMI'C FOR A DUPi.EX IN TNE AGRICUL.TURAL ZONE.
Location: Gcnerally locatcd at the nonhcast corner of thc intcrsection of Barkcr Road and 8ch
Avenuc in thc NW 1i4 of Scction 20, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, Spokanc County,
Washington.
Public Information: Filc CUE-4-90 and thc Zoning Adjustor's dccision dated April
4, 1490 arc availablc for public inspcction at the Spokanc Councy Planning
Dcpanmcnt, North 721 Jcffcrson Strcct, Spokanc, WA.
~
Itt)AKl) t)F AUJUti7'MH:NI' Nt)l'1CH: ()r fiF:AKiN(:-MAY 16, 1990 PA(:H: 2
Lxititing zoning: Agricultura1
Comprchensivc Plan desi6nation: Urban
Sire siu: Approximatcly 20,(}00 squafc fcct.
Applicant: DAV1D WF:ATIiERS . East 18721 81h Avcnut
Grccnacres, WA 99037
Zoning Ordinnncc provisions:
Scction 4.44.170(ii), 4.24.540 (Conditional Usc Standards) and 4.25.030(a).
Comprehcnsivoc Plan provisions:
Scction 1(Urban catcgory). Scction 14 (Urban lnnpact Arca). Scction 21 (Transportation)
S"'EPA statcmcnt- Thc proposal is cxcmpt from the provisions of the Washington Statc
Environmcntal Policy Act, Chapta 43.21C RCW. and the Spokanc County Environmcntal
Ordinancc. Scction 11.20.070(a). .
REQUE.ST FOR RECONSIDERATION:
Thc appcllant wishcs to contcst the Conditional Usc approval on the basis that thtrc was
inadequatc noticc to preparc an adequatc pctition against the application. Thc appcllant also
asscrts that the Comprehensivc Pfan (no scyction spccificd) was not considcrod in iu enarety
as it nlates to the subject sitc and surnound.ing arca.
CASE BEFORE THE BOARD: CUE-4-90
- After conducting a public hcaring on Mnrch 14,1990, the Spokanc County Zosiing Adjusoor
rcndcrcd a writtcn dccision on Apri14,1990 appmving a rcqucst far a Cond.itional Usc Pcrrnit for .
a duFlcx in the Agricultural zonc (CUE4-90). Thc Zoning Adjustor appravod the docision bascd •
primarily on the following findings of fact.
. • Thc adopted Spokanc County Comprehcnsivc Plan dcsignatcs the arca of the pcoposal as
Urban and it lics within the Urban Impact Arca. Thc proposcd usc is consistcnt wnch this
catcgory in that the dcnsity guidclincs for residcntial usc are highcst in the Urban Catcgory.
Thc Urban Category anticipatcs dcnsiacs substantially grcatcr than thosc curncntly
proposed. Thc Urban Catcgory promotcs the infilling of residcntial dcvclopmcnt and the
provision of a broad rangc of public serviccs and facilitics.
• The cxisang land uses in the area of the proposal includc predominantly single-family
residenccs on both smallcr parccls and acreagc tracts. 'Ihesc appcar gcncrally compatible
with the proposal. There is substantial opcn spacc and farm animal kccping in the area '
which must bc recognizcd by owncrs of the propeny and which can bc incorporatcd as
condicions of approval.
- Thc Zoning Adjustor notcs that thc applicants must bc ablc to rtly on the Comprchcns+vc
Plan and official rcgulations in purchasing or devcloping prnpcrty. Whcrc agcncics raisc
specific conccrns about the impact of a proposal, conditions may bc attached to resolve
those issues.
• The subject site is scheduled to cross ovcr to the Ucban Rcsidential 3.5 zonc on January l,
1991, ac which tinie tiic proposed durlex would be perniittcd outrisht bccausc duplcxcs are
allowed uses witli 20,tX)0 squ:+rc feet of fot arca in the Urban Kcsidential 3.5 Zonc.
~
!t()Altl) ()F Af)JUtiT'MN:NT N<)1'1('{: t)H 11};Ak1N<:-A1AY 16, lyy() 1'At;F. 3
• The Zoning Adjustor notcs funher that tliis arca is at an intcrscction of two County
Artcrials, 8th Avcnuc and Barku Road. Thc traffic incrcasc from this projcct will bc
insignificant as compared to the ovcrall traffic volumcs at this intcrsoction. Additionally,
the proposcd structurcs havc becn oricnted to providt for cvcntual improvcmenu of thcsc
rights-of-way whcn dccmcd appropriatc by the Boaid of County Commissioncrs and
County Enginccrs. ,
Thc appcal is basod upon the oontcntion that the County did not givc cnough notioc for the
formulation of prnpcr opposition to the Conditional Usc Pcrnvt. Thc propcr Icgal rcquircmcnts for
advcrrising the hcaring bcfon the Zoning Adjustor of Spokanc County, howcvcr, wcrc mct by the
Conditional Usc Pcrmit applicant.
As mentioncd in the Casc Bcforc the Board, the natune of the Comprehcnsivc Plan omissions in the
dccision malang praccss of the 7oning Adjustor wene not discloscd in the writtcn appcal and
thereforc wil1 havc to bc heand at the hearing. .
fcu
,
,
CUE~■4~90
j L .103 ' i
N . .
,
. ~ _
. • ~ _ _ . • w
T OFFI
. ~ ~ : I►v ~
40 O
' • ~
-
{ ~ O M w~ w
. ,
00
r „ _
. .
SPRi
o .
~ ~ . . ,
~ o
Z s 11T
{ ✓ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ rNo ~ ~ SE~p••.~ A.,E
2 ~I . - +
Y
. ~ .
~ . w .
. Q
ac ~
V T V fOVRTH AVE ~
t:
• ~ 0. ~
v
V
•;;-:z;
EtGNTM AvE
~
. - . ~ ~
< o
O -
aC
ar
1 X • ~
ac
< ^
~
0
~
c~
- - - - - - - - , ~ .n o~ _ ~
~G ~ • ~
L
~
' ♦
u) ~ _ •
. - • ,
1 ~ • 1Q00
~ ~ l
! .
~ s .
89
~
~
~ . . . • . - - ' --~-.r _ . - ~
M <
AV p ~
T ~l ~ r °C
~
4
N~
• ~ ~
• . ` ~ ~ -
Z ~ /
~ • . ~ f ~ {
. , . ~ - .~y .
• ,
• ~ '
t •
• ,
V~
~
~ •
~ f •t 4 1 n v E-
JR44 EWM
,
~ ~ • .M" t„, _ •
~
44EWM .
. •
.
t .
. .
.
~
.
.~i
1
~ • .
, Q .
. ~
. ~ • ~
f
■
~ `
~ • ~
1 ;
~ • . •
~ •
~
1
•
1000
I ll
. .
.
~-~ldg- F'ermit Fee N , Fil A a.
~F-r,---j e,_ t N am e i
' J
A d d ress F' a r c e]. N c..~
Spc-nsoY 's Name F'hone tt
Enqineer/Surveyc•r's/Archi.tect's - Name
Te1. ephone
F'1 ann i nq Cont ac t F'er son
Dat e Sub m i t t ed - Descr i p t i on I n i t i al s
,
.
r,
,
. ' , . _
-
r,~.\ri,~ ! : 1
' , ~ 'Y1} ~'1 :t \
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~
~4;r~
•~~.~T--,•ti BROaDWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
►--41 i L
f.i6 ~tiI~~".~',~i'i+~' PHONE 456-2205
'1~ r " ~•+ars._} ,y.
y:cw:~i~~~.~•t~t~.~'..il.~~ '~i~~`~'.}C4:. j7~:*:--•
- - - ' SPOKANE, 'NASHINGTON 99260
Sc'Otin; ')~-.;t C~IUPF HtlUSE
fq(DrTE(~~ SUD(Dr~~~~ ~~~~NG ~~BL~~ HIEARHMQn
DATE: March 14, 1990
TIME: 10:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE: Spokanc County Planning Department
2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Building
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM5
Filt; UF-4-9Q
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DUPLEX IN THE AGRICULTURAL ZONE
I~4 C A T I O N: Generally located at ihe northeast corner of the intersection of Barker Road
and Eighth Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Scction 20, Township 25N, Rangc 45EWM Spokane
Couniy, Washington.
P R Q P n S A L: The applicant is requcsting permission to erect a duplex in the Agricultural
Zone. Sections 4.04.170 (ii) and 4.24.540 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance allows
this use in the Agricultural Zone with a Conditional Use Permit.
EXISTING ZQNING: Agricultural COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban
SITE SIZE: Approximately 20,000 square feet
APPLICANT: Larry Dierks
South 2624 Best
Spokanc WA 99037
ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS MAY BE FIEARD FIRS'I', POSSIBLY
CAUSING DELAYS. LEGAL DESCR[E'TIONS AIVD PROJECT DETAILS FOR TEIESE PROJECT'S
ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT F[LES. APPEALS OF THE DECISION ON
Tt-IE ABOVE LISTED CASE MAY OIVLY BF_ FILED BY TE-IE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF
RECORD ACCOMNANIED BY A$100.0U FEE. (Scctions 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of chc
Spokane County Zoning Orciinancc.)
, T...
Q
. M&N I ►a~ r
N 4
~ H
10
~ n
~ M
=
~ ~otw t~. ' ~1 T ~ L
OAD
' R H
. ~ AR►c E R ROAU gA R X R
I 0 0 6 .
3 2
g 16 17 ~b SQ ia 13 . I 10 9 g
4
,4 O
, z O
~ 1.
~ ~ . , w,. • ;
. ~
o
0 c~w~~tP • < ~
0. ~
~
~
~ _ .
NAME
/
A.DDRES S
VAR IAN CE NO. G CJ 157
ADMINIS7.RATIVE VARIANCE
PHONE-HOME 92,7-a 84~ WORK
S 2,O ~ T .Z~ N, R
NAME ~C~ vvc.~ ~i r• ~
ROAD NAME 6~ ~
The following documents are needed before the Engineer's Department can begin
processing your variance application as approved.
/---~_RECOR.DED copy of deed, contract or conveying instrument these may be obtained
from the County Auditor, 2nd floor of the Courthouse - Document must display
AUD ITO RS STAMP.
legal description of your access easenent
4-----a listing of the names of individuals who will be signing the documents which
will be prepared by the Engineer's Department. These individual names should
appear as the person(s) legally sign their name. (NAMES)
a current Assessor's map which depicts the location of your property and
ownership aaicro-run. These may be obtained from the the County Assessor, lst
floot, of the Courthouse, Jefferson entrance, 2nd door on the left.
The necessary documents will be prepared by the Engineer's Department,
Rightrof-Way Section, upon provision of the information noted above. You will be
notified when the documents are ready for signature. The documents may be sent to
you, however, IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ALL SIGNATURES MUST BE KOTARIZED. The
Engineer's Department' does have notaries available if you choose to sign the
documents at our office.
Please allow up to ten (10) days for processing of documents.
Please call when ready Please mail when ready
Notice to Public No. Wo!~ Right-of-Way
C 0 MME NT S
~ . ~
Right-of-Way Agent Forward to you from
05090
. ~
LARRY D. DIERKS DILE2F:I.A179JQ 4539
DaWrr M. DIH RKS
P O BOX 661 927-0849 G
VERA ALE, WA 9903 28•825013251
..~ryla//e • ~
OrdeLey- $ .50 _
Iaofqizon
FeCJeRaL cRediT unlon
E. 14523 TRENT AVE.~P.O. BOX 15128
SPOKANE, MSFUNGTON 99215
~
7l97 •
~-i:3 25 L8 25061:989 L058 L8 200 90L,539
. RECEIPT Date / 1990 0987
Received From .
✓
Ad ess ~
oc~
Dollars
For '4 40
ACCOUNT ' NOW PAIO . . , . y
AMT OF • l:t::~•~ , ^ ' . . ~
ACCOUNT I I I CASH I
AMT. PAIO I ~ difCK .S :r i~f r. ~r, . . • . .
i
~ BAOUECE ~ I OMONEY R ER BY
/
~ SK808 RF-OFORM.
i/ i~
. ' ' •
, ~ .
-
, r •
SPOK;ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMF.NT
APPj,jCATIONS BEFQBE'I'HE 20MING.ADn ISTORMOAR ,DOF AD JUS 'IV NT - '
~ld
Certificatc of Exemption No.: • ~ Applicatioa. ~No.: CUE
Namc of Applicant• Q, ~jEQAlep Agcat:-~'Y N
Strcct Address:
zip . . . - , rhone~. - xome:
, c;ty: scacc: 1.4 ~ codc: woric:=
Agcnts No. ~
~ . .f. • ' .'~v.• . ;
Namc of Propcrty 4wncr(s):
~ 1`,~- i
Strcct Address~
Zip. . Pbonc Homc:
City: State; Codc: Woris:
REQUESTED ACTION(S)'
(Circ1c a I . . . ~.j ~
pproprlatc action): ~ ' , Tw•;i::;~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.'i~: ; . ,
~.i~ ' . _ . ~ • • - : ~ • t' . ~ ~ i . j .f ~ •
i 9^j . • Y
V~riancc(s) ~ond'itional ~~Usc Pcrmi~~ N.oacoAfo ~ rming'' ~Lot/Usc. '
Wuivcr of Yiolation . " Tcmporary Othcr:
Z; ~ . .
. . . • , f: • , , _..ti . • . . , I . . , , . . .
i
. FOR S'1'AFF 11SE ONL.Y C4DE:` - ~ ~ ~ ORDiNANCE ~ . : . - . . . .
'
r ~ .
X.14- I
Cltc Regulations Section(s):. ~ ~~'V~~' ' ~ • ~~'~i~ . . ~ ~
,
ro
a•-„~,.. orty>~'~~~.~Viol~tioa/:•``
Section:,,~0 Township: Ra'$~nge: ~
Size;~!Q ~ Enforcenicnt:,-Y -
Existin Zon ' . ~ ' - . ~G ~r~~ ~,7 • . . ~ .
g c: Comp. Plan Dcs.Crossovci'. . 3
~ ~ i ~ . fk « ~r.-t• : ` . .
~ LEGAL .
PSSA: (~Y UTA Y N' ASA Y ~ FTRE DI4T.• ~ CHECKED.BY: s
. , . ~ .
•L • . r
. , ~ . • ! ~e _ . • -
Hcaring Datc: d Pcrsonncl Taking - in Application: ~ ~ •
~ ~ • . ~ , ~ ~ • ~ .z.
- . . . . . .
Existing Use of Propecty: ~~&QALr
Describe Intended Propos.al inTerms of REQUESTED._1ACTI0NS abovc:: T
p
..~~L~.LSr.Lr' ~C~ lii~ r~ ~r UU
g.,
a, ~.[q ~p~r . ~ r~ • • ~~~~~•i _ • . •
/ . ~ •R ~AI~ ~ . . 4'~• P'~: . ~ Y~ A^~ C . . • l ~ J. -
.
Street Address of -Pro erf t ~ - ' ~ ' Y ~ . ~ ~~f~'';~`~' - " • , . . ~ . , . . ~ ' .
PY;•
• . . . . ' • ~ , J? . . . s
Legal . DcscripUOn. of Property. (include eascmont;*' ~ ~f applieable):
• ALL ~.l2.lL.N7Y
!JQ~tj ME o, ,
M~ lw~r-
~ . ~~i~ , ~t>>, . ~ . . ~ ~ r. ' • • ' . . , t , , . : , •
. • ~f , . ; . • t '
, ' • . 9~, . . • , ~ -
Parcel No(s): ~ v ss :z 1C) 2,6 `C Sourco of Legal: Uoz, !9 `'~6E ~5 K rNxr PMr.
Total amount of adjoining~ land controlled by this owner/sponsor:
What interest do ~ you 'hold in 'the property?_,2L L Za~
. . ~ . . . . .
F'iease list prcvious Planning Departme t' action's 'nvolving this property: '
~ . ~ ~~:1~
- ~ ~ ~ ~
I SWEA►R, UNDER PENA►LTY 4F PE;R,JURY, THAT: (1) I,AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNF•R, WRrri-EN
PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORLZING MY ACTJONj QN HTc,hMR BERA+,Fis
A.T'TACIHED: (31; A;.i t7F THEE ABO'JF: R.ESPONSES ANI3 THQSE ON SUPP4RTING
DOCUMENqS A.RE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND T~ T BE.ST O MY OWLEDGE.
! r ~ - Signcd~ ' ~ .
~ - ' Y - •
= Address•
= ' ~ • , ' - - ~ . ~ . ~ _ . . . _ 3•~ .
- • _ - - ' • - . . ~ ~ . .
~ - ~ Phone No.: Date:
_ _ _ - ~ • ~ • •
. . . . '
KCaAR X'Sc-AL-. Notary: A
~ I'~ ~•~',~y.1~ . Iry.. ~ ' • .
Date: . . . . .
Page 3 of 4 ~ .(Over) ~ Ravised 3•4•88
~
. J., . •
. `,i . .
. ~
. ' ,
A. BC1RDF,N QF PROQF
It is nccessary for the 'applicant pr his/her representativc to establish 'the ieasons '
why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic
case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requcsted action
(variance, conditionai use,' etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way
which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor musi consider. Please fil(
the form out and return it with your application. If you did not get a form, ask the
Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed.
. ,
B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND,OTHER ACENCIES '
1. COUNTY HEALIH DISTRICT G a Proposcd method of water supply: • ~'KS~u~:~t~~( 1-~~~ s~
. y
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: -
A preliminary consultation has bcen held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
ha een informed of requirements and standards., . _ •
(Signaturc) . . (Date)` . ' (Sign-off Waived)
2. . IINIX . , - ~ ' r , •
A preliminary consultation has becn held to discuss,_'. the proposal. The applicant
h
been inform of -requirements . and standards.`~_'
LO'A _AA
(S' naturc) (Datc) - . ~ . (Sign•off Waivcd)
3• (Waive if outside WMAB)...-
'
[ j A preliminary consultation has been held' co discuss the proposal. Tha
applic as bccn informed of eq 'rements. and st ndards
F~ . .
, . ' ~1,_ lf7 ?C~ ~ - . . .
(Signature) (Date)'- (Sign=off Waived) ~ .
- . . . . . _
. .
( j The applicant, is; rcquircd to discuss tbc proposal'.with -
tl - to bccome info`med of water system
rcquirements and standards, .
The applicant is rcquired to discuss the pr( posal with
to. bccome info med of -sewage disposal
requirements and standards. . . . , ,
, . , . .
4. WATER PURV '
EY4Br l - ~Cffaive Jf ouctide (_=WSSA)
a) The proposal ' located within the oundary of our future
service area. b) The proposal (Os not located within the ioundary of our current
distri
c) We able to serve this sitr. ' 1. adequate water.
d) Satisfactory arrangements ~ qw>been made to serve this
pro sal.
(Signaturc (Datc) (S; ;n-off Waived)
SEWFRAGE PURYEYORT .
(If othcr than Spokan( County)
_ , .
A pretimi~ary consul:sticn h,;s becr held ' discuss the prapnssl. The applicant has, been informed of requ ements an standards.
. . .
, . - (Signature) y - (Date) (Sign-off
. ' = ' ~i~. ~ .
y~..l. • ~~y
. v •
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
. NAME: D
- FII.E~. cu G 14' CIa .
- .
V. CQNDITIONAL USF.S Statc Law, Scction 36.70.020(7), clarifics that the County
Ordinaaccs a4ust spccify the standards and critcria that shall
ba applicd in the rovicw by thc Zoning Adjustor.
A. Assuming the proposal is listcd as a"pcrmitted" conditional use, do you believe
the proposal mccts all of the rcquired cstablishcd and applicable criteria?
B. What havc you donc ot could you do to: . .
, . ,
, . .
1. Maka the use compatible with other permitted activitips ' in the same
vicinity or 'zonc? ' . ° ' -
LS ~B EAmic y Qg&t Z ~l O~y_t y ~ /c N l~
. . . - , , .
r' . .W9.r and
. 4t ` , . ' , t . . •
2. Ensure against imposing excessiva damands upoa public, :utilities?
: . a _ . . ~ .
AtAd Ra.lkp 46[ nan/'J~. ~ s r LXAJJrR~ C600-
C Explain how or why the progosal will not bc ; datrimeatal to:.- -
1. The Comprehensive Plan: _/.1 P4,F t,s b(a,r" ULP uSfp 61I ~JyTi9L y
A1 NVEI-b&&' 9y, 4 U"R ~64-0 &OWlrQ and
2. Surrounding propcity: 1N1LJ'NT/4n1,r All,~, TO I-MprzA PE AnJ ,D gggm!°
PhPkAZI ~jj~ ~L/14~DtlNAI~►l~i ~~L~ ~l~ &A .Q&j2 7 `J
D. What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safcguards will upbold the spirit
~ and intent (health, safety and goncral welfare) -of thc Zoning Ordinance ~.p
mitigatc any adverse effect upon the neighboring properties including but
not limited to: 1) time limits; 2) front, side or rear yard greater than
minimum staied; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing; S) off-street parking;
and 6) others?
~ ~~►P.~ TJMr -giF ~lt~-
. , . . .
&p =rid H&ME - k~ 11 Y~ltT ~gh NA
41H IIC L' 1IQNe f = 1AM/C-14 "r' AJ?fAQY 22 0x-
~ld Zf~f f ~ ~S &&T
_J-D T ~ FD
2&&=) AN~ AC pltl E4 L /A4-
FOR - /~Y fiflAYIt ~2{i a2zilek
1=~ OAZYaZA~~-
A~ID ' ,4~tT Za &.,e PIr rxnr>1r v
s
cv yl7 k2l~ &r 1 Q1V /~1"J"Er
i .
. L
aT
.
.
aL OCK 22
.
STA1E OF
COUNTY OF
~ . .r..
~A-5 i 30~,_S/ ~ on c1►is ' d.
' I23.00 Public in and
personally ap; -
1 ~
PRESIUENT and _
respeccively, ;
' l,Q tile ~ Q the faregoing i.
voluncary act
2.0
~CA TION. mencioned,
I ~ 6 D
i ~
D
:>1
,
/TA/*
p~'~ :?00 PA RC,EL 3 In day iind yc:,; f! c
. ~ ~ i I s, ~q -r-
~ N
A1Ca ' 3507 p • 0. 7.03.4C Q` . •
•Q ~ ~ . ' s(~ ~ \ }~--3 73, ~
34 .0~E- STOR Y , :
• ~ ~r D~ IOi Eh ~
I St!
~ I
V I ~ ~y ~ I
t0 3s' 'aW;
10 Zi
)l _ _ a.~l _Q^r,~c~rC -~C~~~~Sf_~;~i;_,,'/C•? ) -p - - - - -
~'k
OE~7~Cl:rION
~ C~ `l►~ .:i,
M rp: IJoL , . _ ~ - - - - •
zc 4-
Y~,Y . E~ c~ rH ~sr lr~sS ~~tfo ~ 1. ~ D A vC, .
F41 tio ,
'
RI'a Tac'k in hts~ J,41I1' 1.1.. 31.61i ftl's un S(:: bull tup hyd. .
~ 'Cack in I.i~~- p-sIc N.L. 35.41 l:xist cac:k in N.&Lite p,:
I
I30' 30'' Cenlcr shutt,ff %,.tIve, f ire hyd. N.E. 4i.55 I',K. nail in (lN iie lenc,
I
~
I
f
,
143 Wz
( r
- - ~ t,..~
r ~
~ r.. .
, C bJq L~1 N
APolrlolv
~ 40 ~
0/3
TO 6)err,,I q3 /z
2
i 33' S3
y!
,
+ .
i Q
, ~
. . ~ 2'
i O ^l I
. 7 v
~ r ,Z 0 _2 ~
SEC ,
, 3 1 . k
; z4
J .
, . ~3. 31 .30
; 36 ~37 •
i r .
~ ~ .
, ~ .
. ~ bg
. ' ~
, 1 r. _ . . . . . . . .
~ .~.L. ,N.L.h. ~
~
- 19 1 2 . ;
. r .
! _ _ ,
5
E .
S yS
. 2 . -
l
, 70 u
~ E
.
z5 . .
~
~1.
,
. 1
Gg
~
~,3 ,
_J
~ . 7
,
f
~ ; . . . . . _ . .
, c~l C E = .44o
r
~ ~ ►
,
. ~
,
n ~ + ~ , _ • .
ti o ~ . . . , .
. .
~ SPOX:ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNiE.NT
P
Certificntc of Exem Ption No.: ,Application No.:
,
Name of Applicant: ~AMY D, D/J/?k1- Agent: Y N . •
S treet Address: .~S o~.p•~`~ ~`-rT ' _ Zip . Phone - Home: ' .
City: S State:__,j62/0 Code: Work:~ rj11T~ .
Agents No. , . . , .
Name of Property Owner(s): ~ P;l~ , : ' . . _ . S t rcct Address: .
. Zip, Phone - Home:
City; State: Code: Work:
TtEQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action): . , ' .
. V u r i an cc( s) ~k.;onditional Use 'Permio Nonconforming Lot/Use .
Waiver of Violation Temporary UseiStructure Othet: '
STAFF U5E ONT..Y CODE: ORDINANCE Citc Regulations Section(s):
Property Violationi Section: Township: Range: - Sizc: Enforcement: Y-N '
Existing Zone: Comp. Plan Des.: Crossover - " , . LEGAL . ,
PSSA: Y N. UTA: Y N ASA: Y N FIRE DIaT.; CHECKED BY: ''-Hearing Datc: Personnel Taking in Application: Existing Use of Property: . . R , 4` . Describe Intended Proposal in Terms of REQUESTED ACTIONS a,bove: Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property (include easement, if applicable): -
Parcel No(s): D. ' °2 6 ~ Source of Lcgal: Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owncrlsponsor:
,
What interest do you hold in the property? F'lease, list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
5~t o t,~ p(a7- ,
I S WEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORLZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SYTE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRI'I"TEN _
PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING -
DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. ,
, . Signed: - . . ~ - .
Address: - - . . . , -
Phone No.: Date:
hOTARY SEAL: Notary:
, Date: . , .
Pa e 3 of 4 (Over) Revised 3-4-88
g , , . .
. r , ,
~
• , • ~
. ~ `
A. ~URDEN OF PRnOF , .
It is necessary for the applicant or his/hcr representative to establish 'the reasons why the REQUESTED ACTION~ should be approved and to literally put forth the basic
case. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action
` (variancc, : conditional use,' ctc:) designed • to help you present your case in a way
which addresses the icriteria which the Zoning• yAdjustor, must eonsider. Please fill
the form out and reCurn it with your application. If you did not get a form, ask the
Planning Department pcrsonnel for advice on how to proceed.
. .
B. SLCLN-nEE RY (;QUNTY DEPARTMFNTS AND QTHER ACENCIES
1. -MUNTY H ,A ;TH DISTRI .T
a ' Proposed method of water supply:
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: 4
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has bcen informed of requirements and standards.
' (Signature) (Date) . (Sign-off Waivcd)
2. .
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
hA been informc of requirements and standards. •
. (S' nature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
3.
UTiLITIES D.PARTMF,NT (Waivc if outside WMAB)
_i=
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has bcen informed of requirements and standards.
(Signaturc) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
The applicant is required to discuss the pr,)posal with - to become info-med of water system
requircments and standards.
. ~ .
The applicant is required ' to discuss the pr( .posal with
" to become info• med of sewage disposal
"frequirements and standards.
4. ,~yATER P[IR ,YC)Rr CEive if outsi e CWSSA)
a) The proposal is/is located within the oundary of our future
service arca.
b} The proposal is/is not located within the joundary of our current
district. c,) Wc r~ e/a.rc not abie to serve this site wit1i adequate water.
d) Satisfactory arrangements have/have 0.Q1 been made to serve this
. proposal.
(Signature) : (Date) (S) ;n•off Waived) -
S EWFRA rF~ PjJ VF.Y.QB:
(If other than Spokane County)
, A' preliminary consultation has been held . ~ discuss the proposal.
The applicant has been informed of rcqu` ements an standards.
, .
.-(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
, _ .
. . . R,, .
r • _ -
c
0 ~
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON
March G. 1990
T0: SPOKANE COUNTX PLANNING DEPARTMENT.(Curzent Planning
Administrator)
FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
SUBJ: CUE 4-90 / Dierks
re: Zoninq
We have no comments to make concerning the above referenced
application. The requirements of the County Engineers Department
have been satisfied by Short Plat 89-579.
1 I ~ ~ r• ~ ~ ~ ~ AVENUE
~ 20 ~ .
W ,
~ _ ; _ .
m ZONE C
~
~/RM69 ` . ,
~ ZONE A3 11
20371 ~
2038
~ ~
r~
2~3g \ \
Ii
F
; .
~
• ~ Q
r _
I I ~
y / `
~ ~ hI ' ,ti ~0 :~-`•,~P
~ , ' • :w
: 1t > t , P • ' ~
• ~ N
~•~1 '
~r
f
.y,.
x .
~
ZONE.
, t.,.
~
+~t
i
•
Aa`
24TH ' .
_ J -
- :u
~
u
w
O
Q
O
~ . 4
.,r
~ • ,
~
~
r
.f
~
~
\