2009, 05-12 Regular Meeting r
.
,-t�-�_
AGENDA
�POKANE VAI.LEY CITY COLiNCIL
REGULAR MEETIivG
Councit Meering #159
Tuesday, Niay 12, 2009 6:00 p.m.
Spokane Valley City FIall Council Chambers
11707 E Sprague Avenue
Counci! Requerl.s Alease Silence Your Cel! Phones Durin,� Gounci! Meetin,�
C:�L_L TO ORllER:
INVOCATION P215IU(' iV�31111tI I�CTliliil<,!, Fc�unt<iin 1�iini�tri�s
PI�ED(.E OF AI,LFGIANCF':
ttt)LL (::�LL:
4PPR0�':�L OF :�GE�tD:�:
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND YRESENTATIONS:
COMIVIITTEE, BOARD. LIAiSON Sti1��Y REPORTS:
M.4�'OR'S REPORT: Proc•lum�ltio�rs: Br�ng Your Kids to i3'ork Dav: :lluy i1 Ulder Ameri�an.ti ' �tilvnlfl;
rVcatioric�l .Suf e R�c�li�r�,l 6�'eek
PUBL.IC COMMENTS: �rhis is an app��rtunity for the public to speak on any subject not on the agend��
for action. When }�ou come to the �cxiium, please state your name and address for the r�cord and Iirnit
remarks to three minutes.
1. CONSEYT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine �vhich are appruved as a�rc�up. A
Councilmember may remove an item fram ttle Consent Agenda to be considered sepai~ately.
a. Approval of the following claim vouchers:
�/23/2009 17133 - 17194 � �87,943.19
4/24I2049 17195 - 17215 $75,695_29
412$/2009 17216 $25U.00
�/01/2009 172�9 - 17285 �26,3�3.7�
GRAND TOTAL ��9 Q,2f2.2 3 �
b. Approval af Payroll for pay period ending Apri134, 20U9: $357,5�7.86
c. Approval of April 14, 2009 Regular Council Me�ting Minutes
d. Appro��al of A�ril 28, 2009 Regular Council Meetin� Rti�l��tes
YEW BUSI�YESS
2. Secand Reading 1'roposed (Urdinance U9-OU8 Amending Cumprehet�sivc ['lan —�like fi �1i1(lt� �r
[public comment]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-009 Amending Zoning Map — Mike Basin���r
[public comment]
4. Second Reading Propos�d �)rclinan�L (�9-� l �, Ratch (`���je Ar1�e 11C�illc'.flt� -- � '}iri;tina .)ar�s��n
�public commentj
5. Pru��osed Resolution 09-UU� 13���Ici��� Autlic�ritti� — Ken I lic}iii��s��r� (publie eocnment�
�. Motion Consid�ration: S�raQue Avenue ResurfacinQ Phase I Bid — Neil Kersten (public cumment�
(.itllilCll Agenda05-12-i19 R��ul�r?�i�c:ting �''�- � �'t �'
:�D.MINISTRITIVF RFP�RT
7. Draft �rdinance 1�Iodifying Spokartz Valley Municipal Cc��fe 9.1 U(to« -
(an Whitnzy/Cary Driskell
K. Splashdown Contract Discussion - Nlike Stc
9. Western Dance Hall Contract - Mike Ston�
I0. Allocation of Space at Valley Precinct Buildinry - Morg.in Kc.�uc3�lka
1 1. Regional Transp�rtation Update - Mavor Munsoi�
YLiIiLIC C0��1:1�IENTS [�his is an opporcunity for the public to speak on any� topic. V�%hen you cume t�7
the podium, please state your name and address f�r the record and limit remarks t�� three mi�lutes.
I�'YFORN[ATTON OiVLY:
12. Winter Road Assessment - Neil K�rsten
EXECLITIVE SESSION:
r'�U.IOURNMFNT
TUTURE SCf�EDL'LE (meetin� sc•heclt�l� is crl�t�crys s ubj�.�et tv �=hunge
Regular Council hfeetings are generally /�eld lnd nnd 4`'� Tuesdays, begin�ri�rg ut G: 0�I �.nr.
Council Study Sessions are generall�� l�eld 1�", 3 an�! Sth Tuesdat's, hc��inning at 6: OOn.m.
hC7IICC: ln�livi�ivals p{annin� to ari�nd th� me:ctir�g «ho rcquire 5peciaJ �usist:uice; to acc.ommadate physical, hearing, i�r other
impairrnenis, ple�se contact thc Cin• Clcrk at (509) 921-1Q00 as sovn as possiblc �o thut arrun�cments rnny be m�de.
Council ��gcnda US• 12-09 Itegul�r Mcetin� f'c;c� ' of 2
i�-
��
~�� ��. __ -
L�� �
p
ok�ane
Valle �
� .
� L'0 C��Yltt�tiD Il
�I'ake our �Daughters and'Sons to �ork�� �ay
City of spokane �a��r, �asFiin�to��
j��HEREAS, Ttie �tils. FourZduti�n for l��'onzejz luunch`d "1 ake Uur l�augjtlers a�iil Soris r<<
j�'ork� Day to help our daughters and snr�s reach their,�l�ll ; ��-�t:�r�!:.r! r,. ����Ir����-�.
fam i 1 y 1 ife, ty, ;'�.
t e comn:uni an t eir� r:,r-1r� �. ��:-,� � �, �;,
j�'HEREAS, Take Our Daughters and Sons to i��u��k U���' u`t.�i�j�t, �tlli/�)1'(I!)lUi� c�cti►�itr��s i! �
C12C0111'Qg� ,�;,-1�� ,1�1�� ��r�?�ti� �r� r1zl?tl' �t�r>> J�trrt�� l�l�'T�' r��'�';r f7,' fl;,' �;t!���•��' �'r7tt r',
� , ,l r '_� ,': :1�...
{j //j,�'L:-j 5, I1lI'ulc�%1 lill� �'tiil�tli/r.�ricl� �'_1��� i'ici��'c �1!'i.� �lilcl i>Ul'.� f%c'h:ii lv .�c� r�i�' �(�rii:� C I i� %;;
bet�veen stterliE��� �r,1 .1rkc� »1rr�lr. I'f���li.cla. .�cic�rtc CIf1(j lI?Pll �rt�,r�lit tn 1%,�.
tit�orld; a�u�
WHEREAS, Take C�i�r Daughters and Sons to Y�'ork �- -. ,.. � . �., :, -.� , , ;; , ; i � < < - .. � � � � � � : � - � , . � � � � �
of jvb possibillrie and firtrrre oPp�rtttnitie.c re�nrc�le.c,c nf ,�en�er, r�cc ����
backgrourrd; air� '
WHEREA.S', Take Our Da�rghters u�u� Sons to tif'ork`" l�uy ullu�t�s �irls und boys ti��
opportunity� to share lrl �y1C 1'1SlOrJ f ht�ildir�� .( ��t'f'�'i %1ii?(1�c'. il?�I��;ii?�' (l,'�';1'
vision of todav their reality for tornorr����
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Richard Munson, Mayor u,j tlic.- �'i�ti� c�� . �1JU�C111C � 1��,llt.l, v�� 1>c-li�l�i �11
Ihe .Spokane i�alley City C'�r��lcil <rrr� thc� citi�c�».�• n�' llac� C'ilt• ��,�'1�nkrn7P i'nll�l dn hc�rc�l�_�
proclaim ��rrv 14, 2009. a �
Take Our Daugliters and Sons to Work" Dcri•
LII1L� 1 QI1C0111"�I�r(' li�C'l"l� (1 ��Il�'l)1('.C,�'(�S (1/1Cj I)I'��(lill�(tlll))11' /ll t'1!(�� �ri?�t !i:; � �r1;•r�.��'�11i! :li;�� 1I.�
���il►'�!L'1 �)f (J1�.�
1 �cllc'�t� 1{1!� 1 ,ill c1c11 ��J .��1c11 ,flli'�.
�
� �I, ;�
+, � ;
� -� �/ r f-'�'C��
� � �� " ! � �
>
� lchcrrd .�:s���%?
�, � � _� frn��>>�
� � -
L"
I,
....�..
�-
r� r� c� �=„
S oka.ne
p
Valle
y ,
�1'OC�cZlIl��ti011
OCder.,� mericarrs �Konth
City of Spo kane �a �ey, �ashi rr� t c� ri
j�'HERI:fLS', The cityuJSpuku►ie ���u!ley, l���u.,i�:��l_,����: i, �; ���,;,, . - �,t� ��:,�.-� r:� �;��� .���
� r � �. � j
il��.. i .�rt , ,,:��'���' (�;t �;' jrr�7Ji.'. i, .,
{� N���<•��.5� ll/tlt'!� cl�!!l!'l.) 1/1 (1111� Ct1I117�)ll1i111j �Ir'�� (iil r!�����`�ri!;% .';;i �.r:.��... .,'i�. „%. .� i�_' .'�!+!;,
Pop�lation with evolving needs; af<<'
f�'HEREAS, Older A»zericans are valuahle m��1;�,��:�,�� >> �,;� � , ,. �� ,,, ' � � � �: ��
� i, �, �t �;�! � l.;l�iii� r�,
COI]II712U11�IC'S C1j11� I�� i'�i'i;<<� 1�:1't �;1�,''�f
�'HEREAS, The i�tcreasing nt�l�tl�c>> uj t���b}�-duu�iE���� i�c�c�c�iti,t� tl�c�c�itl� 1 �,:: � ,� : � : ; : �: ;,: � �, ,, ��
� ji'(' 1?{'('�� �)(' l►1('/'�'(��'�'(�.t7j�ij)OT'l (lf�"),�i�i'1' ;1L� Cll��i;
�
�
{f 11L1.L.-L l� !.� 111� / �.��_���;i�1�':(ll.l ��! iil��� i c�i%iJli�ii:;ll�'.� lii 1t �!I r� c��ll<<''�c�l ii:�."�. � 1 � ;i� �(�;.li'�'� �
older adults' unique health and long-term care challenges and �hat systems c�;
cure are moder»ized to hc�lr� e'ninnl��c�r ��lcic .-�rrr��ri� �rf�c ��i��c� tl��m mnr�
cnntrol over their own live.�
NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Richard Murtsojt, ,�luy'o�' o,� tlic L'tty uJ S�uku»�.� 1"ullc.�y�, u�t heflc�l,f ��;
1�1C' S�7n�CQr2e ��C1jlel' ��1';� � r�iili�'l� cl%;�l 111�' �'llf.-t'�?� r>� jl;�' �!t_1' r'�/ ,���r���Ct�lc' ��t1� tj;� �;c'7'i'�)l
proclaim Mu_��, _, ' 'I -� : � �
(I1�/c�;• : li�rt�j•ic�tl�i� .�1r1i111�
, t
�
(li:ii � c!l��li!l��l�i �1��%��tt%ll� It- l�li�:�' 1i�1:�� 1�ti�� �IL�:I� �r� I�;��%r��)' ��7: r�J���.�i� �1:�;�if\ (ii,.. �'1c�
� .
prufessivnuls, family mem.her.r, nnd rrti�en.r K�h� care_;� �� rlr� ���.
I�ated this 12th dnl� n1'.�1�1u1� 200�
, t , ,, � .
,
�
�
i� �7 r,�%�� (/
���
s
� IC�ItII'; � j �?: f? �'r"�? i
' l' �
��,' �;J1'� ��
:
<
�
S`�"'okane
p
Valle �
y .
�L'OC��Y1�Zt(4It
�ationaCSafe Boating �Veek
City of Spokane �alrey, `Gt�asFiington
l�i�HEKI UVL')' Ititi �o-third� uJ�u111atal boatiiir Clc'C'li�t'llt 1'l�'lll)l�' �l!'(��t'11�'��. Uilcl (�f l�l��.��', ��(l`.%r�
tt'c'1'E' llr�f lt'i'c1l'Ij?�� �1 llfc' JClC'�ii'l.: clil�j
I��IER��-1S, U»1��1-�;'�o uj c�t�cttlt.� c�c,��trf (�ll ����.�.�c�./.� <<�I1c� lltc' ri)���1'illr�i' I ��r�l r��c��r����c�
hoating safery instruction QI1 c 1
WHEREAS, The majority of boating accidejits ure caused by human er��� �r ��1- ��<�� ��� j r�� i�, �l: ��-�:
il??ii I;l�l j 1 l��)i!!. �'�llll��lilt')Il Ul' � ilt'il•i�l�li;�')li�l� ��1�'T���t',�.� ll�i��
�� H�K�.�.S, :� S1�!)l�lc'U)I! 11IU)lbt')' UJ bUUlt'/'J' Ib'llU lc)SC' lj1L'll' lll't;.� ��l' c l�%'r :;�, �,+: i%:" ��, ��'l 1��'� l%
lt't??l�C� J1t' c1�11't' ���c�;71' �li7(�!j1C'1' lt'+�7'1] !jl('l�' ll�' Tl!['�'i'/�'• t("
�� Elf:��if.�. 1.�, ` :I ; i. � . �. . , , ,:
��li�.i:ili c'�ili�.� � l�l� �ll(%/i ����f:r��.. Jiil��l� ��� i�i�tfi��' .11��i� fi';+��t �
than sn�les of years �ast and shot�ld be t�tilrzed b�7 the boating pr�bli�
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Richard Alitnsv►z, �layor of'the City of Spokane t'allc�y�, ort behalf of
the Spokane i'alley City Cotrrr�•il �r�rr� ll�r° c•i�i-��frc ��f rl�t� �'rtt• nf ,C,���krr�tc� i�r.11����. ��n Irc�rc�1�1
'�r'��� '�,:��. � ��.���� ?�: _ -,� , �"t!l�) , ,
1 _. . .
��llllUll(lI S 'afe �UUllil� j� E,'C'
u,rd 1 e�icourage all those who bvat to st�pport the goals of � tl�e Nvr111 �me� '1CCJ17 S 'u�e Boul i� 1� r
.,.
��C1II1�7Q1�!?, �111j8C� ��rRjeS �r)11�c'l' �CIUcI�l%'i��il�. �li;�� � �il?l�'tl ,�!iilc'� � �l��l�'l �r?1�1?'c� . li:.t'I!i�t?'l� �l�lc f��
nractice safe boatirT,� 1�:<>>:!�
Datcd thi.c 12th tici�� ��1 .tJ��i� 'i�����.
, � � � -
a
�
� -- -
� � i , ._
►. ,, - - � /` ��
• .
�
� ' ` /yr�—�tf
� IChCI . 'flll'l.cnjl
,� �(Ij'<71'
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
BACKGROUND:
VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER NOS. TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT
04/23/2009 17133 —17194 $387,943.19
04/24/2009 17195 — 17215 $75,695.29
04/28/2009 17216 $250.00
05/01 /2009 17259 —17285 $26, 373.75
GRAND TOTAL $490,262.23
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson
ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists
vchitst Voucher List Page: 1
04/2312009 9:05:17AM Spokane Vailey
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptioNAccount Amount
17133 4/16/2009 000796 BUDINGER 8 ASSOC INC M07309-6 41954 MATERIAL TESTING #0016 17,128.00
Total : 17�128.00
17134 4/16/2009 000796 BUDINGER & ASSOC INC M07309-7 41954 MATERIAL TESTING #0016 369.50
Total : 369.50
17170 4/20/2009 000379 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY BLA-02-09 BLA-02-09 PINESMIANSFIELD #0�0 98.00
Total : 98.00
17171 4l20/2�09 001948 AFFORDABLE DCCELLENCE 09-0789 REFUND REFUND PRE-APP FEES 250.00
Total : 250.00
17172 4/20/2009 001948 AFFORDABLE IXCELLENCE 09-0798 REFUND REFUND PRE-APP FEES 250.00
Total : 250.00
17173 4/21l2�09 001916 PN AMERICA Registration 42282 PTV VISION VISUM: R KIPP 950.00
Total : 950.00
17174 4/22J2009 001534 ALL PRINT 11741 LOGO ENVELOPES: CD 266.32
Total : 266.32
17175 4122l2009 000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC. 6-41145 OIL CHANGE: 40209D 36.99
Tobl : 36.99
17176 4�009 000234 ARLT. SHANE Expenses REIMBURSEMENT FOR CELL PHO� 108.69
Total : 108.69
17177 4/2?J2009 001606 BANNER BANK 0620 MAR 09: DEMPSEY 79.90
0638 MAR 09: GOTHMANN 1,774.96
2832 MAR 09: 2832 1,526.30
4342 MAR 09: DENENNY 25.00
4359 MAR 09: TAYLOR 1,714.95
4383 MAR 09: WILH(TE 25.00
4458 MAR 09: PASSMORE 2,121.56
4474 MAR 09: THOMPSON 2,612.26
Total : 9,879.93
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page 2
04/23/2009 9:05:17AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
17178 4/2?J2009 000379 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY fi368 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 20.97
6370 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 8.13
Total : 29.10
17179 4/22/2009 001048 CITY PARCEL 3290081 MAR 09: COURIER SERVICE 18.14
Total : 18.14
17180 4/22/2009 000618 DEPT OF FISH & WILDLIFE 4048 MAPS FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS 64.00
Total : 64.00
17181 4/22/2009 001280 DEPT OF LICENSING 00002186 4TN QTR 2008: MLS CREDIT CARD 239.18
Total : 239.18
17182 4/72/2009 000409 DEPT OF REVENUE 1 st Qtr 2009 1 ST QUARTER 2009: EXCISE TAX 192.60
Total : 192.60
17163 4/22/2009 000746 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT 1 ST QTR 09 1 ST QUARTER 2009: UI TAX 125.52
Total : 125.52
17184 4/2212009 000106 FEDEX 9-146-36509 SHIPPING SERVICE: LEGAL 63.76
Total : 63.76
17185 4P22/'LOQ9 000179 GFOA 2611834 REGISTRATION BALANCE: DUFFEI 36.00
Totai : 36.00
17186 4/22/2009 000002 H& H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 093313 TONER: 14915 93.87
Total : 93.87
17187 4/22/2009 001729 HALME CONSTRUCTION, INC. Retainage RETAINAGE RELEASED #0053 47,175.64
Total : 47,175.64
17188 4/22/2009 000993 LES SCHWAB T1RE CENTER 126472 WINTER CHANGEOVER: 06769D 59.79
Total : 59.79
17189 4/22/2009 001852 NATL RESEARCH CEI�JTER, INC 3340 NATL CITIZEN SURVEY 3,950.00
Total : 3�950.00
17190 4/22/2009 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER FEB 09 CASH RECEIPTS JOURNAL SUMMf 98,776.13
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
04123/2009 9:�5:17AM Spokane Vailey
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptioNAccount Amount
17190 4I2212009 000307 OFFICE Oi= THE STATE TREASURER (Continuec�
JAN 09 CASH RECEIPTS JOURNAL SUMM� 48,268.24
MAR 09 CASH RECEIPTS JOURNAL SUMMf 79,613.22
Total : 226,657.59
17191 4/22/2009 000512 OFFICETEAM 23566842 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 639.78
23566843 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 652.00
Total : 1,291.78
17192 4f1212009 000308 SPOKANE CO PROSECUTING ATTY FE8 09 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUND 1,387.04
JAN 09 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUND 666.97
MAR 09 CRIME VICTIMS COMP FUNO 1,135.03
Total : 3.189.04
17193 4/22/2009 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 010020000600228 2008 VOTER REGISTRATION COST 74,461.80
Total : 74,461.80
17194 4/22/2009 000065 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE 3106338431 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 9.18
3116595573 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 399.03
3116822176 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 164.81
3117083258 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CO 182.19
3117319556 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 16.94
3117615315 OFFICE SUPPLIES: CD 185.80
Total : 957.95
27 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 387.943.19
27 Vouchers in thia report Total vouchers : 387�943.19
M
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
04/23/2009 9:05:17AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
1, the undersigned, do certify under penatty of perjury,
that the materiais have been fumished, the seroices
rendered, or the tabor performed as described herein
and tt�at the Gaim is Just, due end en unpaid obligation
against the City ot Spakane Valley, and that I am
authorized to authenticate and c8rtify to sa(d claim.
Flnanoe Diredor Date
Page: 4
vchlist Vou�he� List Page 1
04/24J2009 1:51:01 PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
17195 4/24/2009 vendcode 1 ST LINE 1 ST AID INC 11453 FIRST AID/CPR TRAINING 640.00
Total : 640.00
17196 4/24/2009 vendcode AIRFACTZ 28768 DRIViNG RECORD: HR 25.00
Total : 25.00
17197 4/24/2009 vendcode ALSCO LSP0591212 FLOOR MATS: CtTY HALL 14.47
LSP0594795 FLOOR MATS: PRECINCT 17.97
Total : 32.44
17198 4/24/2009 vendcode BERK 8 ASSOCIATES 5682-03-09 COLLABORATIVE GRANT: CD 2,313.75
Total : 2�313.75
17199 4/2412009 vendcode CODE PUBLISHING CO 32805 MUNICIPAL CODE UPDATE 206.96
Total : 206.96
17200 4/24/2009 vendcode COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:021876 COFFEE SUPPLIES 60.30
3820:021892 COFFEE SUPPLIES 220.33
3820:023011 COFFEE SUPPLIES 269.10
3820:023565 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 32.90
Total : 582.63
17201 4/24/2009 vendcode DEX MEDIA WEST April 2009 ADVERTISING: CP 40.00
Total : 40.00
17202 4/24/2009 vendcode EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC, INC 23690 LEGAL SERVICES 40.00
24067 LEGAL SERVICE 40.00
24403 LEGAL SERVICES 45.Q0
Total : 125.00
17203 4/24/2009 vendcode MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW CP 4-1409 Media ADVERTISING:CP 2,788.30
CP 4-14-09 P&P ADVERTISING: CP 1,123.20
CP 4-1409 Postage ADVERTISING: CP 2,181.80
Total : 6,093.30
17204 4/24/2009 vendcode MICROFLEX INC. 18480 TAXTOOLS SOFTINARE RENTAL 343.83
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page 2
04/24/2009 1:51:01 PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Ve�dor Invoice PO #t Description/Account Amount
17204 4/24/2009 vendcode vendcode MICROFLDC INC. (Continued) Tota� ; 343.83
17205 4/24/2009 vendcode NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 72861 STAMPS: CD 2p2,g7
Total : 202.6T
17206 4/24/2009 vendcode OFFICET�EAM 23602991 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 631.63
23602992 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 643.85
Total : 1,275.48
17207 4/24/2009 vendcode ONEEIGHTY NETVVORKS 646498 ETHERNET: APRIL 503.34
Total : 503.34
17208 4/24/2009 ve�dcode PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 23421 REPLACE GRAPHICS ON PD CRUI; 149.46
2�78 SAFETY SIGNS 65.�
Total : 214.68
17209 4/2412009 vendcode SERVICE PAPER CO 30446032 SUPPLIES: PRECINCT 190.46
3���9 SUPPLIES: PRECINCT 45.66
Total : 236.12
17210 4/24/2009 vendcode SPOKANE REG SPORTS COMMISSIO� 1 st Qtr 2009 LODGING TAX REIMBURSMENT 27,500.00
Total : 27�500.00
17211 4/24/2009 vendcode SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 94712 SPRAGUE/PINES PCCP INTERSEC' 609.40
Total : 609.40
17212 4/24/2009 vendcode SRCAA 64 2ND QTR 2009 28,999.50
Total : 28,999.50
17213 4/24/2009 vendcode STATE AUDITOR'S OFFICE L76369 AUDITORS 3,834.10
Total : 3,834.10
17214 4/24/2009 vendcode TVV TELECOM 02867457 INTERNET/DATA LINES 1,663.14
Total : 1 �663.14
17215 4/24/2009 vendcode WfTHERSPOON, KELLEY 229552 PROFESSIONAL SVCS 253.95
Total : 253.95
21 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 75�695.29
Page: 2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
04/24/2009 1:51:01 PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptloNAccount Amount
21 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 75.695.29
I, the undersigned, do certtl� under penalty of pe�Jury,
that the materiais have been fumished, the services
re�dered, or the Isbo� perfom�ed as described herein
and thaE the daim is just, due and an unpaid obligation
against the Cfty of Spokane Valiey, and that I am
authorized to authenticate and certify to safd claim.
F(nance Diredor Date
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List Page 1
04/28/2009 3:54:28PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
17216 4/28/2009 001076 CONNELLY, MICHAEL 428-09 TRAVEL EXPENSES/HOTEL 250.�0
Total : 250.00
1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 250.00
1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 250.00
I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury,
tfiat the materials have been fumished, the services
rendered, o� tfie labor pe�fortned as desuibed herein
and that the claim is just� due and an unpaid obligation
agafnst the City of Spokane Valley, and thet I am
authorized to authenticate and ce�tify to said claim.
Finance Director Date
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
05/01/2009 11:45:51AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Descriptlon/Account Amount
17259 5/112009 000921 A TO Z RENTALS 190322 FURNITURE RENTAL: CP 73.05
Total : 73.05
17260 5/1/2009 001081 ALSCO LSP0598454 FLOOR MATS: CITY HALL 14.47
LSP0602091 FLOOR MATS: SHERIFF 17.97
Totai : 32.44
17261 5/1/2009 000221 AM PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC 2009 MEMBERSHIP 147.00
Total : 147.00
17262 5/1/2009 001938 BERGER/ABAM ENGINEERS INC 15111 PROFESSIONAL SVCS: PLANNING 3,037.59
Total : 3.037.59
17263 5M/2009 001409 BEST LINE 0531Q4162009 ANSWERING SVCS: CP 20.00
Total : 20.00
17264 5/1/2009 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 0063386 LINEN SERVICE: CP 75.63
9015087 LINEN SERVICE: CP 181.17
9016970 LINEN SERVICE: CP 373.84
Total : 630.64
17265 5/1/2009 000148 BLUMENTHAL UNIFORMS 8 EQUIP 741795 EMBLEM CHANGE: COSV PD 8.15
Total : 8.15
17266 5/1/2009 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 3820:024556 COFFEE SUPPLY: CP 170.04
Total : 170.04
17267 5/1/2009 001888 COMCAST MAY 2009 HIGH SPEED INTERNET 108.95
Total : 108.95
172G8 5/1/2009 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION #19 APRIL 2009 WATER CHARGES 279.56
Total : 279.56
17269 5/1J2009 000823 DEPT OF L& I 186908 BOILER INSPECTION: CP 358.40
Total : 358.40
17270 5/1/2009 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST APRIL 2009 ADVERTISING CHARGES:CP 225.00
Page: 1
vchlist Vou�her List Page 2
05/01/2009 11:45:51AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
17270 5/1 /2009 000912 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST (Continued) Total : 225.00
17271 5/1/2009 000010 FEDEX KINKO'S 289700006154 PRINTING: AQUATICS FLYER: CP 682.64
Total : 682.64
17272 5/1/2009 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 31951 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00
31952 LEGAL PUBLICATION 101.15
31953 LEGAL PUBLICATION 36.55
31997 LEGAL PUBLICATION 94.00
31998 LEGAL PUBLICATION: SPRAGUE A' 119.75
32000 NOTICE OF ORDINANCE PASSED 28.90
32001 LEGAL PUBLICATION 96.05
32002 LEGAL PUBLICATION 46.75
Total : 548.15
17273 5/1/2009 001465 GAVIN ASSOCIATES Billing # 2 42174 CONSULTING SERVICES 2,565.00
Total : 2,565.00
17274 5/1/2009 001940 GROUP MOBIIE INTL 10097 42345 GD-ITRONlX GC6000 LAPTOPS FOI 10,899.00
Total : 10,899.00
17275 5/1/2009 000472 LAWTON PRINTING 24471 ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT PRINTING 570.68
Total : 570.68
17276 5/1/2009 001002 M 8 L SUPPLY CO., INC. 913601.1 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 286.11
Total : 286.11
17277 5/1/2009 000788 MEDIA JOE, INC. 3051 ELECTRICIAN SERVICES: CP 90.60
Total : 90.60
17278 5/1/2009 000512 OFFICETEAM 23636803 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 603.10
23636804 STAFFING SERVICE: LASERFICHE 652.00
Total : 1 �255.10
17279 5h/2009 001860 PLATT 5962728 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 58.87
Total : 58.87
17280 5/1/2009 000322 QWEST 509-921-G787 511B PHONE SERVICE 46.33
Page: 2
:�;, :
vchilst Voucher List Page: 3
05/01/2009 11:45:51AM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor invoice PO # Descriptlon/Account Amount
17280 5/112009 000322 �WEST (Continued)
509-922-7091 060B PHONE SERVICE: MISSION POOL 109.30
50&926-1840 1946 PHONE SERVICE: PARK RD POOL 109.30
Total : 264.93
17281 5/1/2009 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 3445434 TREE PLANTING: MIRABEAU 190.23
Total : 190.23
17282 5/1f1009 000935 SERVICE PAPER C� 30447712 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 1,878.65
30447726 SUPPLIES: PRECINCT 775.49
Total : 2,654.14
17283 5/1/2009 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST #3 170-0040-03 WATER CHARGES: PARKS 32.95
475-1495-00 UTILITIES: PW 8.96
Total : 41.91
17284 5/1/2009 000420 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DIST 1st QTR 2009 WATER TESTING 159.00
Total : 159.00
17285 5/1/2009 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 24557042fi61-8 WASTE MGMT: CP 731.30
2455705-2681-5 WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT 285.27
Total : 1,016.57
27 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 26�373.75
27 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 26,373.75
i, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of pe�jury,
that the materiats have been fumished, the services
rendered, or the labor perfortned as described herein
and that tfie claim is jus� due and an unpaid obiigation
against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am
authorized to authentfcate and certify to said claim.
Finance Director Date
Page: 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: � consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ p:�bl�c n�.ar�r,a
n inforr�ation ❑ a�t��ir repart ❑ F�n�in�� I��is'�t��r�
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending April 30, 2009
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIO�VS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Gross: $230,165.46
Benefits: $127,392.40
TOTAL PAYROLL� $357, 557.86
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompso; .
,��T�ACHM�NTS
DRA FT
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, April l�, 2009
Mayor �-lunson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and welcomed ever��one to the 1�7th meeting.
Attenda�rce: Cih� Staff
R.ich Munson, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager
Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Mike Jackson, Depaty City Manager
Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Steve Taylor, Councilmember Kathy McClung, Community Development Dir.
Diana Wilhite, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director
Greg McCormick, Planning Manager
Mike Basinger, Senior Planner
Karen Kendall, Associate Planner
Christi�a Janssen, Assistant Planner
Marty Palaniuk, Planning Technician
John Whitebead, Human Resources Manager
Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
Chris Bainbridg City Clerk
INVOCATION: Pastor John Vanderwalker of Community Christ Church gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Members of Girl Scout Daisy Troop #3679 led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roIl; all Councilmembers were presenr.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was mo��ed hy Gouncilmember Trrylor, seconded and ruianinrously�
agreed to approl�e the amended agenda.
INTRODUCTION QF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a
CUMMITTEE, BUAItU, LIAISON SUMMAItY REPORTS:
Councilmember Schimmels: reported that about three weeks ago he attended a Grand Opening for Meals
on Wheels at North Crestline; attended a Solid Waste Advisory Committee meeting as well as the liaison
board meeting last week.
Councilmember Wilhite: reported that she attended the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation
Commission) meeting and met with members of that staff; attended an Association of Industries
breakfast; a meeting of the Kootenai transportation group; an open house at Pine Ridge for their ne«�
Alzheimer's facility; attended the Spokane Valley Chamber's luncheon to hear our Mayor speak; also
attended the Walt Worthy open house for that new building; attended the Greater Spokane, Inc. Armed
Forces luncheon earlier today where awards were given to members of the military for their participation
in community affairs; and attended the Liberiy Lake open house.
Councilmember Tavlor: mentioned he also attended the opening of the Walt Worthy buiiding.
Deputy Mayor Denennv, and Councilmembers Gothmann and Dempsev had no report.
MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Munso� reported that last week he gave the State of the City Report at the
Chamber luncheon; met with Mayor Verner to discuss common issues; attended a meeting here dealing
C'ouncil Re�ular i�9eeting: 0-�-1-�-2009 F'a�c 1 nf l�
Approved by Cauncil:
DRAFT
with wastewater treatment plant issues and mentioned the County's draft interlocal agreement that staff' i�
reviewing and which Council will review later, attended the open house for the Walt Worthy building;
attended a breakfast with Commissioner Richard; met with some Intermountain Bank representatives,
several of whom attended an open house at CenterPlace about a month ago, and they expressed their
desire to get involved with some community projects, and Mayor Munson said he mentioned SARP as a
possibility for them to help developers look at the plan; and he attended a three-day course for emergency
management training.
PUBLIC COMME�JTS: Mayor Munson invited general public comments.
Ian Robertson, 1716 S Rotchford Drive: said he wanted to give a report from the Panhandling Committee
and discuss a clean air proposal using federal grants to help fund infrastructure improvements without
increasing local taxes. Regarding panhandling, Mr. Robertson said that Council appointed a committee
last year to investigate what could be done about the growing panhandling problem, and said when
Council is ready, tliat Committee would like to give a presentation to Council; the committee has three
recommendations such as safety and secwity issues which would require local ordinance changes, said
that about 20% of panhandlers need genuine help in dealing with drug problems and/or mental illness,
and he said the Committee will recommend that police and others may refer those people to existing
social service agencies, and that the Committee wiIl recommend suthorizing a PAC (panhandling action
committee) to educate the public about the problem; and Mr. Robertson volunteer to lead such a group if
that is Council's desire. Mr. Robertson said he was informed by one panhandler that he made between
$60 and $80 every two hours, and the panhandlers himself told Mr. Robertson that there is something
wrong when a panhandlers outside Wal-Mart can make more money in one day then an employee of Wal-
Mart. Regarding turning trash into cash, Mr. Robertson said he distributed a copy of a letter previously
given to Mayor Munson regarding Community Minded Enterprises, of which Mr. Robertson is a member,
wrote a$4.1 million grant application for F.B. ScoSolutions (a Spokane Valley company) to the
Department of Energy to build an Advanced Anaerobic Digester System and a Methanol Reactor
somewhere in Washington State; and said if this is built adjacent to the Waste-to-Energy plant by the
Spokane airport, and if our City, Spokane City and Spokane County designate the new federal energy
block gants of $3.5 million, this facility could be built without local or state tax money; and he explained
it would provide clean energy that could provide a source of income for Spokane Valley and its neighbors
for years to come; and would save millions of dollars by not hauling over 66,000 tons of waste every year
to the Regional Landfill in Klickitat County. Mr. Robertson said he is available to make a presentation to
Council later on this issue as well.
Chuck Trimborn, Pastor of Glad Tidin�s Church, , located at 4224 East 4''' Street in Spokane• he said the
church owns some property hitty-corner from the church which is in Spokane Valley; he said about a year
ago, church members decided to sell two and one-half lots of that above-mentioned property, and as thcy
prepared to sell, ttiey discovered the zoning had been changed so that they could not sell the lots as
r�sidential lots; that they spoke to our staff and were told that the zoning was going to change back to
what it had been previously, and therefore the Church members decided to wait until that zoning was
reverted back to residential; he said it is important that the Church can sell those lots as the Ghurch needs
the finances and does not need the (ots.
Harrv Sladich, President of the Spokane Regional Convention and Visitor's Bureau: e�plained that he
was asked to come by Liz Beck to discuss or answer questions regarding the TPA (Tourism Promotion
Area); and regarding CenterPlace, he said that they have worked with Director Mike Stone and his staff,
and Mr. Sladich said that individual hotels in Spokane Valley feel they don't have a tool to markct
CenterPlace; and Mr. Sladich referred to several handouts he had distributed concerning hotels and
CenterPlace; and said the desire with these marketing materials is to give each hotel in Spokane Valley an
independent piece to have them market their hotel on one side of the sheet, and CenterPlace on the other;
and Mr. Sladich said there ��rere some hoteliers who chose not to participate; that the Bureau has its o«�n
Council Regular Meeting: 04-14-�009 1'age 2 of 1�
Approvcd by Gouncil:
DRA FT
marketing materials for CenterPlace; but this is just another piece paid for by the CVB (Convention and
Visitor's Buresu) to give each individual hotel so they can sell not only their establishment, but
CenterPlace as well; which appeared to be the "missing link" when they found that some of the hotels
were frustrated and felt that perhaps the Center or the Bureau wasn't recommending them, and this is a
tool to give them the power to do that; and he cnentioned the next step is a meeting scheduled at
CenterPlace with the hotels, the CVB, and Director Stone, to discuss how to execute this program.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Amendment #2. 2009 Transportation Improvement Pro�ram (TIP) — Steve
Worle
Mayor Munson opened the public hearin� at 6:21 �.m. and in��ited I��ir. Kersten to explain the pm�osal.
Public Works Director Kersten explained that this is the second amendment to the 2009 TIP and includes
minor changes as they previously omitted the Sprague ADA Improvement projects which need to be part
of the plan in order to use REET funds; and he expla.ined that the project would upgrade sidewalks from
Universit� to Sullivan; and that staff also recommends proceeding with the design of the Bowdish Road,
32" to S Project and the Evergreen/32° 16�' to 232" Evergreen to SR 27 Project as well. Mr. Kersten
said the 2009 budget has sufficient funds to accommodate the projects associated with this amendment.
Mayor Munson added that the $7 million would be offset by $28,241,000 from other sources, adding that
it is good to have those dollars funneled back to Spokane Valley. Mayor Munson invited pul�lic comment;
no comments were ofj`'ered and May or Munson clased the public hearin� at 6:?3 p.m.
2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of itents cor�siJered routine �vhich are appro�•ed as a group. A
Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
a. Claim Vouchers, Voucher # 16902 through # 17059; 3309014 and 401090010: $2,946,100.58
b. Payroll for pay period ending March 31, 2009: $363,973.16
c. Approval of Interlocal Agreement with State of Washington Department of Licensing
d. Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes of March 24, 2009
e. Approval of Council Study Session Minutes of March 3], 2009
It was moti�ed by Cor�ncilnrember Tcrti-lnr, seco�lded, a�rd tmcnlinrously ng rc�ed lo nppro►>e �he c�»>.cerrt
a�e�tda.
NEW �3USINESS:
3. Sec�nd Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-005 Airport Overlay — Karen Kendall
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Counciln:ember Gothmann and
seconded to atlopt Ordinarrce 09-OOS with Optio�i 2 l3�SDOT. Assistant Planner Kendall went over her
PowerPoint presentation explaining the proposed ordinance and the various options; followed by Council
comment concerning the process for camprehensive plan changes or zoning code amendments. Mayor
Munson invited public comment.
"I'anya Chestnut, and Steve Blanford, 3204 East Rivercrest, Post Falls, Idaho: Ms. Cbestnut explained
that they own property located at 7524 Buckeye, and as previously explained, have a sewer and water
hookup with a house on one side and the water and sewer already in; that they were told they couldn't
build on it; that they would like to be able to build there, that noise is not an issue, but if they can't build
they would have a$50,000 lot and not be able to do anything ��vith it; and she encouraged Counci! to
make a decision tonight as the cost of lumber continues to rise.
Neil Sealock, Director of Spokane Airport and Felts Field: he said he speaks on behalf of the Board: that
they take seriously their public responsibility to make recommendations and to safeguard those essential
public facilities; that Felts Field operates on federal dollars; that there are commercial and publie services
which they must protect for existing and future uses; that he realizes the challenges the local govemment
has to preclude incapability use around the airports, and he asked that use be compatible with the
development around the airport.
Council Regular N�e�ting: 0=�-14-�009 Page 3 of !�l
Approved by Council�
DRAFT
Carter Timmerman, WSDOT Aviation Division; 3704 172�' Street, Arlington, WA; said that he wanted to
clarify WSDOT's proposal as mentioned previously; he referred to his handouts showing various airport
runways such as Anacortes and Evergreen, along with the traffic pattern for Felts Field and his map
showing his proposal of division of zone 6 along Utah street and East Rutter; he said there are 182 sewers
which abut south of Utah and there is significant more developable land south of Utah, and said their
proposal will allow more development and better use of infrastructure and will minimize impacts on the
airport and protect the airport; and that they want a proposal which will reduce future conflict.
John Townsley, 607 West Montgomery Ave Spokane: explained that he represe�ts the Washington Pilots
Association Board of Directors, and said he appreciates the challenging task before Council; that he
supports the comments made by Director Sealock regarding the importance of Felts Field and in terms of
the value the airport brings to the community; that it is clearly not just used by smaller aircra.ft; and he
supports Mr. Timmerman's analysis and said he believes Mr. Timmerman and the Aviation Division
presented Council with opportunities to protect the airport and address tlie need for continued
development within Spokane Valley; but said he has concerns with the criteria as written; he said the first
criteria is clear; but he said the other two criteria have the potential to allow the area to grow significantly
more then the first criteria; and he suggested the better alternative is to avoid bringing additional
residential dwellings into the area and asked that Council consider striking the second criteria from the
thr� criteria presented in the proposed ordinance.
Dwi�ht Hume, 9101 N Mountain View Lane, Spokane: said he has been attending the meetings with
Council and the Planning Commission; said he was unaware of the introduction of this new subject of
option 2 until he read it on the web this afternoon, and said he was told otherwise by staff that option 4
was what was being proposed; he said this zone 6 is a noise zone and not a crash zone; he said they
developed and offered and there is incorporated into the suggested motio�, that there is a declaration on
the face of the short plat or plat warning the buyer of moving into a noisy area; and said more
significantly, this is a situation which is all infill, and these are homes that will be built �ti�ith today's
construction standards and will be quieter than the homes currently in the area; he said the airport officials
are saying this is a crash zone and therefore is a safety problem; and he said there is no difference
between the houses north and south of Rutter; the infill and the precaution of putting the statement on the
plat �vill give a better and quieter home then otherwise; and he said there is no distinction and Council
would be discriminating between the two with no factual basis other than a statement from the airport
buard that they realiy are worried about Felts Field closing; but Mr. Hume said this is not going to close
down and more importantly, there is a water district which has begged for a change so the hookups and
expense can be recovered in revenues; and he emphasized his desire to keep this in its entirety and to keep
the lot owners on both sides of Rudder and Utah with the rights and privileges of the same; and go ��►�ith
the original proposal which is option A.
Mil:e King, commercial realtor, business address 9300 E Spra�ue Avenue: said he is representing Life
River Fellowship Church, located at 2819 N Park Road; and located adjacent to Victory Faith Fellowship
Church and Orchard elementary School; he said the Church would like to include a Community FaciIities
Zone which would allow the churches and the school to continue to be in compliance with zoning and
allow them building permits for alternations and improvements; he said to his knowledge, neither church
is planning an expansion, but this would simply allow them that option; he said by including the
community facilities zone as it eurrently is, it will allow the churches to sell their property or use it or
recoup their investment if they decide ihey need to move; he said that both churches are aware of the
airport overlay and have been to the zoning hearings; both che Pastors would be willing to sign papers
stating they are aware of the Felts Field airport traffic and the noise issue; and not to hinder airport
operations of Felts Field in the future; and said they need the community facilities zone reinstated as it is
now, into the new ordinance to protect the future of their properties. Mayor Munson said Could would
like staff to get back to council on this issue, and said he is not sure that zoning change is part of the
Council Regular Meeting: 04-14-2009 Pa�c •i of 1�1
��pprovcd by Council:
DRAFT
ardinancc under discussiun now; and �-tr. Connelly concurred it would be an additional z�ne chan�e for
further consideration, and could be a comprehensive pla❑ chan�e as «�ell. Ma��or N1unson asked i�1r. King
to coc�rdinate this issue ���it}i staff.
Nancy Holmes, �412 N St. James Place, Spokane: said she represents the Spokane Airport "I�ennant
Association; and she reminded council she spoke the fast time about their desire to reach a compromise
on this issue; said the association appreciates the efforts of WSDOT and Spokane International Airport
(SIA); and they care about the viability of Felis Field; and understands the situation of those trying to
develop property in connection with this; she said the Association had a meeting and they are willing to
support any of these options brought forward tonight as they believe in the best interest of all parties.
Neal Sealock, Airport Director: said in reference to the comments regarding "crash zones" that that is an
antidotal term not a term of art; there are runway protection zones, tra�ic patterns, and zones of use; and
said the challenge with the option to the north with parcels to the north, is that it is in the tra�c pattern
area; so the point is it is not simply a noise issue but is indeed an operational issue for the operation of the
airport and not for the single runway, but for all landing services at Felts Fields, and said he was fortunate
to have grass, unimproved, asphalt as well as water at a single location, therefore making them unique;
and said that all of the processes and procedures offered refer to all those issues.
Sharon Panther, 8004 East Glass: said she has been dealing with this since 2007; that 8004 E Glass is an
acre of land; that they purchased the land in the 1990's and the County told them they could not subdivide
until sewers were in; that sewers came in in 2005 and she contacted sta.ff about how to go about this; that
they put in multiple stubs for water, sewer, gas and power; and said none of the plans �vould allow her to
do what they had intended for that property; she said she met with one of the City's planners in 2007, she
said she does not understand where this came from, tfiat no one published it but the previous mayor and
councilmembers just did it; that she checked with other organizations such as DOT and she was told that
this plan was adopted out of order; it was put into place long before the Comprehensive Plan w��s
formulated; and said there is no one in Orchard Avenue who could shut down the airport even if the}�
wanted to; that she has lived there 45 years; when this was put into action in 2006 the initial committee
did not check with the airport, or the DOT and she said this was not mandated; and she asked where is
option 4; she said that was going to be her retirement and now it will sit there and will have no resale if
one is nat allowed to build on it; the house is 70 years old; and said if council decides ta �o south of the
railroad tracks, what would it hurt to go north.
Ravmonci Gunning, 621 S Thierman; and the two properties of concern are 361 S N Eli and 77189 E Glass;
that he bought the properties in 2005 and talked to everyone to get the sewer and water hooked up; he has
two separate residences; the houses are there which he bought as rentals; he submitted his packet and was
told he could not proceed as the airport overlay was adopted; he said now, four years later, he's had the
property sold three different times aod lost money on it; and is back here talking about new, proposed
issues; that he attended the meeting in December where they thought option 4 was going to work to tak�
care of all the different people involved in his position who have sewer and water stubs and wani to build
their own places; and said he appreciates the time Council has put into this and hopes this can be worked
out; and said with the Utah Rutter idea, he is in zone 6 so if the adoption is for the north of Utah, his
properiy is out and he'll be stuck with two houses on one parcel with no value; that he paid his fees and is
now being told he can't do anything because of the different options still being proposed.
Josh Nerrren 8204 East Jackson: said he's south of Utah and in the same situation as others bere; he
bought his house about eight years ago, he bought it as an investment as it had a separate piece which
they believed could be subdivided; he was told he could wait until the sewer was in; the sewer was put ir�.
they came back do�ti•n and «ras told f�e couldn't do it; and he said that there was no public announcement
Council Regular Meetin��� i)�i-1-�-�OQ9 I'����c � ot� 1=1
Approvcd by Counci I �
DRAFT
that he was aware of or a meeting to discuss this, that it �vas just adopted; he said he's do���n by Trent and
can't imagine why that would be affecting the airport.
City Clerk Bainbridge read a letter from Edie Streicher, Government Affairs Director on behalf of the
over 1,100 members of the Spokane Home Builders Association, which letter stated their support of the
ordinance as presented as they believe it is a good compromise to previous options; and that notice posted
on �ew plats as required by this ordinance will be sufficient notice to new home buyers of the possibility
of increased aircraft noise.
Mayor Munson invited further comments; no other comments were offered. Mayor Munson remarked
that option 4 is now option 1. With Mayor Munson's consent, Dwi� t Hume commented again and said
the letter from the Home Builders was in support of a motion but of a motion that was originally coming
forward through the couneil, not option 2 but option 1. Mayor Munson said Council is aware of that.
Council discussion pursued with remarks by Councilmcmber Gothmann about trying to manage a
valuable facility while accommodating homeowners and their rights to develop their property; he
distributed a sheet of facts regarding Felts Field, and said he got most of this information off the Intemet
of Spokane International Airport, and he explained about the operations and the flights associated with the
airport; he said there are four runways and not two, and he referenced the information from Mr.
Woodward (Public Relations Marketing Director for SIA), Airport Layout Plan map, and handout on
Felts Field showing information for prefight purposes and the length of the four runways; and added that
there is also a water runway 6,000 ft long x 100 ft vvide; and between the two major runways is a grass
strip so people can learn to fly on unpaved strips. Regarding tbe WSDOT proposal, Councilmember
Gothrnann explained that there was a study he did showing scatter diagrams from runways in California,
superimposed on this facility to demonstrate the rate of accidents in each zone; and he said he re-ran d�at
information based on Mr. Timmerman's proposal and in zone 6a, the accident rate is 2.7 times the zone in
6b, and further explained that if you are within the 3,000 foot-zone, the accident rate is 2.7 times what it is
between the 3,000-6,000; and that 6a is eighteen times what it is when you are a mile out from the
runway; so Mr. Timmerman's proposal makes sense because it is based on sound fundamental statistics
of aircraft accidents: there are more accidents closer to the runway then further away from the runway.
Councilmember Gothmann said the subject of noise is also addressed, and said if you are twice as far
from the runway, the noise would be one-fourth as much, based upon the assumption that the noise occurs
in the middle of the sphere. Councilmember Gothmann mentioned the proposal to extend the runway
another 550 feet; which will mean large aircraft can be accommodated which will result in more noise;
adding that the noise we have today might not be the noise of the fuCure; and that we should be planning
for the future noise; adding that Mr. Timmerman's proposal takes this into account; and said he supports
the compromise to prohibit additional development north of Rutter; but feels the zoning oeeds to be
changed north of Rutter, which is a separate issue to be taken up at a separate time as a comprehEnsive
plan item.
Councilmember Taylar said to support this option, we are operating off of two assumptions: one is that by
building another 200 residences in this area within a noise zone, that this world bring on the demise of
Felts Field; and second is the potential expansion of Felts Field, and said he feels input is needed from the
community on whether bringing in larger aircraft is something that is compatible within an urban area so
close to a significant number of residences; adding that we also need to protect the air facilities, and said
that option 4 brought forward from staff adequately reaches a compromise to make sure properry owners
who have invested in potential new residences, can be made whole at the same time insuring we don't
have unreasonable eneroachment upon the airport; and said that we currently have the most restrictive
airport zoning guidelines of anywhere i� Spokane County; and more restrictive then most communitie�
throughout Washington state; and said this compromise only within zone 6 is adequate to meet
everyone's needs. Regarding the sewer stubs, Councilmember Taylor said the main issue why this zoning
Council Rc:gular tite�ting: 0�-1�4-?009 i'age G of 14
Approvcd b}� Coimcil:
DRAFT
was brought back to the Planning Commission was an effort to try to resolve this issue when the UDC
(Uaifortn Development Code) was adopted and from the recommendation of someone outside staff and
outside the organization, without knowing the history of what l�as gone on with the landowners in this
area, for Council to automatically bring this forward as a viable option without doing a considerable
amount of analysis is premature; and added that what Council is considering, is to place a tangible
restriction upon people which will be a hardship, that water utilities will also have di�culty meeting its
growth and revenue projections due to this restrictioa; and that this restriction is being put in place to
mitigate a potential threat, which Counciimember Taylor said he feels is e� small given the zoning
in the area, and said he does not see Felts Field closing because of noise complaints.
Deputy Mayor Denenny said then this was originally brought up, he was concerned about the area east of
runway 2-1 and that he had asked what was the information pertaining to the extension of Felts Field, and
given the extension, that there is a compromise here tonight that addresses the concerns of the long-term
long-range slow encroachment upon the airport; and said he wants to stop elements that may be there 20
years from now which start to "push the envelope" on that airport and make it so it is�'t as viable as it is
now; and given the information pertaining to the 500' extension, he asked Mr. Sealock the status of that
extension and the background pertaining to it. Mr. Sealock explained that the plans for the extension are
reflected on the Airport Layout Plan for Felts Field, there is no financing available for that at the present;
it is not a"shovel-ready" project and would have to be fully funded and vetted and said they are not
altowed to divert funds from other locations such as the International Airport to accommodate those
changes; that those changes have been on the books for a long time. Deputy Mayor Denenny asked if that
would be something to come before the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley, City of Spokane, and
Spokane County to gain their input, and Mr. Sealock confirmed and e�plained that through the SEPA
process, the public would have opportunities for cc�mment.
Councilmember Taylor mentioned that if we start bringing in a significant amount of jet traf�ic into Felts
Field, then it will not matter whether this ordinance passes or not, but there will be more complaints from
the existing residenis; and we have a large amount of people living within Millwood and Spokane
County, and Spokane and widlin Spokane Valley that surrnund this airport, and we don't hear complaints
today; and rhetorically asked if 200 additional homes will be the "straw that breaks the camel's back;"
and said he highly doubts that. Councilmember Dempsey said if you multiply tlie 200 homes by tl�e
people living in those homes, there could be an additional 500 people to put into a small area; and she
added that she realizes the decision to be made tonight is an extremely dif�icult one. Councilmember
Gothmann said if he wece to ask who in this room has the most experience of keeping airports, the answer
would be WSDOT; that it is WSDOT which has the experience of keeping airports and preventing them
from going away; therefore Councilmember Gothmann said he would listen closely to what they say; th��c
he also �oticed in option 2, he totaled 81% of the parcels will be developed according to option 2
compared with 100% of the original 4; and if that SSO' runway extension occurs, the aircraft would have
to fly 35 feet lower at a slope of 3.5° then the present guide slopes, which gives more noise next to
people's homes; and said that presently on the north side of the runway, the traffic pattem goes over
Fancher Hill whic:h rises significantly so it would end up that those planes would be only a few hundred
feet below the tra�c pattern, as Fancher Hill is 700` high and the traffic pattern is 1,000' and the homes
are approximately 300' under tl�em, and it is l�is understanding that there are noise complain�� now.
Mayor Munson remarked that future councils will alv��ays have t}�e opportunity to change t�lese
regulations based on tvhat is occw at the time; and to try to guess what might occur in the future
would be di�cult; and said for tUe small percentage who will not benefit from this, it has a greater benefit
on them then on the ones who will benefit, which is his concern; however, he said he will reluctantly vote
for the motion as be feels it is the best compromise at the present; and it can be changed whenever the
need is demonstrated; and said he hopes Council �ti•ill ask at a future meeting t� recommend a zonin�
Council Regular Meetin�: 0-1-1 �3-?0(19 f'a�e ? �f 1•�
Approved by Co�incil:
DRA FT
change to the Planning Commission; and lie cornmended the public for providing input so that Gouncil --
can take the action necessary.
Councilmember Taylor said he would like to make an amendment to this, and said he believes there is a
need to make those people who(e who have the sewer and water stubs to their areas in the 6a zone; which
is the least Council can do so as not to take away people's investment in that 6a zone; and re-stated the
amendment is to allow the :�iderlying land use designatiorr for lhose lots that have had sewer or watc.�r
s�ubbed 1». Councilmember Wilhite asked if Councilmember Taylor would include in the amendment,
that sewer and water was to have been established prior to 2-28-06 in order not to encourage people to
rush out and get sewer and water in so they can develop the area, but those people who have already made
the investment should be permitted. Councilmember Taylor said it would be as of today; with
Councilmember Wilhite countering that the date was the date originalty brought up by staff concerning
when the sewer and water was hooked up. Attorney Connelly said to clarify, that it sounds that the
proposed amendment is that exceplion A: the site had sewer arrd water stubs installed for ficlure
developmerrt prior to the adoption of the city of Spokrnre's initial airport haurrd overlay regulalions on Z-
28-06 be added as a criterra in tlre 6a area �rorth of Utah Averrue and East of Rutter Avenue; which �vould
be adding a way in which properties could be subdivided in that area which under option 2 is currently
precluded. Councilmember Taylor confirmed that is his proposed amendme�lt. Deputy Mayor Derrenny
seconded that amefrdment. Councilmember Gothmann said he thought the difference in what was
proposed by the state and what's being proposed by Councilmember Taylor, seems to be proposing the
same thing that was proposed two weeks ago. Councilmember Taylor said no as there are several criteria
under the original 1. City Attorney Connelly said it only allows exception A and does not allow exception
B or exception C. Councilmember Gothmaan said he does not see the difference as the original proposal
was to allow everyone who had a sewer stub to go ahead and develop it; and Councilmember Taylor said
no that there were several criteria with "or" between those criteria; so one would not have to meet all tl�e
criteria, but only one. Councilmember Gothmann asked what would happen if that area were re-zoned for
mixed use; could those sewer stubs not be used in mixed use for other uses than residential?
Gouncilmember Taylor said the answer is, we don't know because we need to do a study for that
particular area to see if mixed use would be compatible with a primarily residential zone.
Councilmember Gothmann said he does not see the difference; under the motion presented by Mr.
T'immerman, 184 parcels could be subdivided and 42 could not; and under the amended parcel, 184
parcels coutd be subdivided in 6b and a2 in 6a; and Councilmember Taylor said he does now know how
many parcels have the stubs in 6a, and for him the issue is not numbers but of the investment already
made. Councilmember Gothmann said from looking at the map, he counted about 51 so his estimate of 42
isn't too far oflf Mayor Munson said it does not include the adjacent lots; and Mr. Connelly said the other
criteria is the dependent relative subdivision; that the second criteria is adjacency, and the third criteria is
an accessory dwelling unit; that it only includes sewer and water stubs in 6a and does not include the
exception b consistent with adjacent property sizes, or exception c more than one residence is located on
the property. Mayor Munson asked then, if it is correct to state there are a total of 42 parcels and ���e
don't l:now how many of those only have water and sewer. Mr. Connelly said he has not done that count.
Mr. Gothmann said he just counted and he got 51 and about 50 north of Rutter have dots in them,
assuming tbat is the criteria. Mayor Munson then asked, of the tota142 parcels e�cisting in 6a, were those
parcels that included all tlu criteria or just the sewer and water stubs. Planner Kendall said the number
of parcels that have the potential of being fur�her divided have not been analyzed for any of the three
criteria; they are only lots that are large enough under the underlying zone; so in R2, they're 20,000
square feet or greater, and in R4 they are 12,000 square feet or greater; and said that has nothing to do
with the number of sewer or water stubs or parcels that have multiple lots; but it does show that there are
about 42 on the north side of Utah and East Rutter that runs east/west; there are 42 lots that have beeri
sewered, and two that have water; and the green triangle on the map shows the lots that have both water
and sewer south, and it matches the numbers referred to, there are about 184 parcels to the south of L1tah
Council Regular I�Tc:eting: 0�-14-2009 Page 8 of 14
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
- and East Rutter which have been sewered, and 10 have been stubbed for water. Ma}�or Munson invited
public comments on the proposed amendment. Sharon Panther, PO Box 11355 Spokane Washington,
99211 said there has been more information just come out since they had an opportunity to speak, and
said she is coafused; that her property is north or Rutter, one block south of the Spokane River, and she
asked where does that area fit into any of the things discussed tonight, where there could be some
mitigation; and added that in 2005 they did the sewer, water, electrical and gas. Mr. Connelly said the
amendment before the Council would allow development of 6a if sewer or water stubs exist, which is
being considered now; and Mayor Munson confirmed if there is no sewer and water in there now, it
cannot be developed. Mayor Munson also invited Ms. Panther to contact staff fur any further clarification.
The amended nrotion is to allow subdil►isions to occur in 6a pursuant to criteria A, either water or sewer
stubs or both. vote to anrend the nrotion.• Deputy Mayor Denenny, and Councilrnembers Taylar,
Schlmmels, and Wilhite. Opposed.• Mayor Murrsort and Councilmembers Gothmann and Dempsey.
Motion to amend passed. Vote on the amended motion to adopt ordirra»ce 09-�OS with Option 2 WSDOT,
to allow subdivisiorts to o�cur in 6a pursuant to Criteria A, either water or sewer stubs or both, rnrd 6b
pursua�rt to the options. fn Favor: Unanimous. Op�osed.• None. Abstentions: rrone. Motion carried.
Councilmember Gothmann said he would like to see if there is Council consensus to have the Planning
Commission look at the area north of Rutter for the possibility of making it mixed use; and Mayor
Munson said he thinks that can be handled at the next study session.
Mayor Munson called for a recess at 7:50 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:00 p.m.
4. Second Readin� Proposed Ordinance 09-007 Havana Street Bridge Project — Mike Connellv
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Tuylur uml
seconded to adopt Ordinance 09-007 providing for tl�e acquisition by eminent domain of certcrin lancl.s
necessary in connectiort with the Havana Street Bridge Project. City Attorney Connelly explained that
this ordinance is a beginning point of any eminent domain or condemnation action; it makes two legal
determinations: that the use is for a public use, and the fact that it is being used for public right-of-way
resolves that issue legally; and that it is necessary for the particular praject in question, and the
engineering plans that have been submitted from a legal perspective, fulfill that requiremeni that this is
reasonably necessary as part of the bridging the valley project and the bridge over the Havana tracks. Mr.
Connelly expIained that the law requires that the property owner be made whole; and the statute ensures
either by negotiation and settlement or by a verdict &om the court, that the property owner be made
��vhole; and the law sets forth specific criteria of when offers are to be made, the legal consequence of
those offers, and when responses or settlement is to occur and those legal consequences; and one of the
ways the property owner can be made whole is for a determination to be made either by negotiation or
court verdict that the take is a total take due to the impairment of access or the usability of the remaining
portion of land after the take occurs; the City of Spokane has indicated that the possibility of a total take is
something thai is being considered, but that there has been no offer made in part because they are not to
that point in the process as the appraisals are not yet complete. Attorney Connelly furtber explained this is
a unique situation as this City considers permitting the process, th�n the City of Spokane goes through the
process with the property owner; that the City of Spokane Valley is not paying any money for this
property and is not incurring any risk or liability, as pursuant to the interlocal agreement, all the risk and
liability will be handled by the City of Spokane. Councilmember Gothmann asked why pursue the land in
this manner instead of making an offer first; and Attorney Connelly said the reason we are at the point �ve
are now, is because of the timing of the project and the funding of the project, requires a finding of public
use and necessity relatively quickly; and that needs to be done prior to the process to actually determine
what the compensation will be pursuant to the statutory process. Councilmember Gothmann said that the
map shows a 50' corridor, and there are rumors there will be an additional 30' beyond that; and he asked
for confirmation of that rumor. Mr. Connelly said the ordinance being passed tonight is only for that
portion identified on t}�e map, a 50' piece at the top narrowing do�vr� to a 10' strip alon� Havana; and if
Counci! Regular Meeting: 04-14-2009 Page 9 of 14
Approvcd by Council:
DR�iFT
there are any additional properties required to be proposed being taken by condemnation other than by
agreement, they would have to come back to this council to amend the ordinance; and Mr. Connelly
stressed that the only authority council is granting with tonight's ordinance is for the property set forth on
the map. Councilmember Wilhife asked for clarification as she said she thought it was the �0' plus the 10'
for a total of 60'. Mr. Connelty said he feels the area is �vhat is set forth in yellow on the maps provided,
and he said the Spokane project sta.ff �vill address that; and said that the ordinance should be passed prior
to the interlocal as the one alludes to the other and we would not want to give the City of Spokane the
authority to move ahead without first making the pracess legal through the ordinance.
James Richman. Citv of Spokane City Attornev's Office: Mr. Richman explained that at the last meeting
this Council had two requests: one for drawings of the project, which were provided electronically mid-
week; and t6e second was more deta.iled explanation for the need for this bridge; and said Mr. Glenn
Miles, SRTC Director is here tonight to explain the project. Mr. Richman mentioned that Spokane City
staff tonight includes Mr. David Steele, City's Rea) Estate Manager; John Mercer, and Steve Hanson
Project Engineer. Mr. Richman said there has been an of�er made to the properiy owner some time ago,
perhaps even a few years ago which was made when another agency was handling the acquisition efforts;
and said more recently the acquisitioa offer has come in-house with the City's real estate agents who have
been working with Mr. Hite; and there will be additional work o� evaluating how the project is impacting
Mr. Hite's property and they will review and re-consider the offer previously made; and he repeated that
it is his understanding that an offer has been made; and he said they are going to do their best to treat Mr.
Hite right in this matter; and it also appears that 10' is needed on the southern portion for right-of-way
purposes, and toward the north end of the property, it extends to 50' according to the drawing, and they
will use that area for drainage, and next to that for the length of the property they are acquiring, is a
another ten-foot strip they'll need while the project is under construction as a temporary easement for a
one or n�vo-year period; and one the project is complete, tl�at easement would terminate.
Glenri Miles, Mana e�Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRT�C�: Mr. tililes distributed copies
of information and explained his handout: "Havana Street Overpass — Executive Summary;" aad added
that Havana tracks are closed on an average of 16 hours a day; and there can be 60 to 120 trains a day in
that location, including a Iot of switching activity, and there are some trains which operate remotely all
making for a dangerous location; and said most people know not to use Havana. Mr. Miles said there are
approximately 1900 cars daily on Havana; and the tra�ic study indicates that if Havana were put in as an
overpass over those tracks from Broadway to Trent, the tr�c on Havana could go up to about 19,U00
�ars daily. As an interesting note, Mr. Miles said that if Bridging the Valley did not occur, today on the
BNSF cocridor there is approximately 192,690 annual vehicle hours of delay in that location; and by 2030
that could go up to 467,000 hours of annual delay; and by building these great separations, it goes to no
delay. On Havana, he explained, the current delay is appro�cimatety 11,000 hours of annual delay even
with the 1900 vehicles moving on a daily basis; and if the separation is not built, that number will go up
to approximately 22,000 vehicle hours; compared with Park of about 37,000 hours of delay today and if
there is no Park separation, there will be about 80,000 vehicle hours of delay at Park; so this creates a
safzr environment for those travelling, creates an opportunity for new routes to go from the City of
Spokane Valley to other points in the region, and it reduces the emissions that occur from all those
vehicle hours of travel. Mayor Munson asked about the accident rate of cars colliding with trains; and
Mr. Miles said that most of the trains in the Havana area move very slowly; but in Park and Pines where
the speeds pick up, ihere have been a number of hits and fatalities at those locations.
Council discussion included mention by several Councilmembers that they visited the site in question;
mention by Mr. Richman that the area is being re-appraised; mention by Deputy Mayor Denenny that he
would like assurances that by granting this authority that negotiations will continue; mention by Mr.
Connelly that there is no legal bonding contract we could impose on an ordinance as the negotiation ha�
not occurred yet, and the assurance that the property owner wil) be made whole is in the statutes, which
Councii Regular tileeting: 0�3-1 �3-2C�U9 P�e 1 Q of 1�
Approvcd by Council:
nx,� rT
set forth penaIties for not being realistic in offers to properiy owners; that we car►not build assurances i�to
our ordinance but his experience is the statute works in the favor of the property owner; and the City of
Spokane is proposing to do it exactly as dictated by statute; mention by Councilmember Dem�sey that
there is a different between experts who can evaluate Mr. I-�ite's property and someone who has the
expertise to move that type of equipment in and out of his business; question by Councilmember
Schimmels about the process of making an offer then doing the taking after the fact, with response by Mr.
Richman that typically the area is appraised, then an offer made, and he said negotiations could take a
variety of directions, and that this ordinance doesn't mean the negotiations will end. Mayor Munson
invited public comment.
Gary Hite, owner of Hite Crane & Riggin�, 4323 E Broadwav, 99212: said he appreciatcs the time and
said it is gratifying seeing the councilmembers visiting the property to get a better feel of the issue as it is
diff'icult from looking at the map to tell what the plan is; he said it is very confusing; that he has not
received an offer or information regarding any appraisal and that there has �ot been an appraiser on site
until [ast Friday, which came following tlie last Council meeting; he said he understands the purpose is to
move forward when all other recourses have been used and that this is the last recourse; that negotiation is
first and to him, that includes discussing price and value and said one has to know what can be spent
before making an offer on any kind of property to move it; that his biggest concern is that he hears it can
go to court to get this resolved, but he doesn't have that kind of time as he understands it would take a
year or two in court, including attorney's fees and that after all that, he would be broke; he said the
government finds ways to pay their attorneys, but once he's broke, there is no way to make him whole;
and said he can't spend all his time on something that should have been negotiated prior to this; he further
explained that bridging the valley is a viable program and he agrees with the overall program; and said
there are tr�c issues with Park, Pines and further east and he feels it would make a significant different
there; but with Havana, he feels it got tacked on at the end because there's funding available. Mr. Hite
further explained that there is no plan for egress or ingress beyoad the bridge; and if you got past the
trains, you couldn't get onto Trent today; and south to Havana you can't access the freeway, and he had
photos showing the shop access, parking and what would be lost due to this process. Mr. Hite said there is
no question about him staying; but the question is whether there would be further negotiation to acquire
the pmperty around him, or to completely move him — none of which has been o�'ered; he said as a legal
obligation and to make anyone whole, he feels the City needs to show the need and to show the affect on
the surrounding people, and said that has not been shown; he said this will shut him down and he won't
be able to operate; and said the proper and good faith negotiation needs to take place prior to the exercise
of eminent domain which has not taken ptace. He said he has a copy of the minutes of the last meeting;
and he thought council decided there was not adequate proof shown that this process was necessary;
regarding the ordinance, be said concerning the fourth "whereas" that they haven't made any
compensation or made any offer of compensation, and pointed out the clause about the city representing
that it negotiated in good faith but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase price — he said no
purchase price has been offered; and he asked Council to request the City to provide a�ood faith offer t��
represent that it has negotiated in good faith prior to Council adopting this ordinancc.
City Attorney Connelly said Council aeeds to keep in mind that we are not taking his property toni�ht;
and we are not granting possession or the authority for anyone else to move to his property; but this is
declaring there is a public purpose for the property and that it is necessary to accomplish the public
purpose; and that the law states that before they can tal.e or acquire possession, there has to be payment
of the value of the property; and said we are not there yet; that there has been testimony on both sides and
the City of Spokane represented their process, and Mr. Hite disagrees with how much good faith
negotiations has occurred; and he explained that the pictures are part of the negotiations for value that
wiil occur down the road; and this ordinance simply starts the process, and the issue cannot move until
this body declares the public use and necessity; and said there is no taking until I�1r. Hite agrees with an
offer or a court mak�s that determination.
Council Regutar Meeting: 04-1=�-2009 Page 11 of 14
Approved by Council:
DRA FT
After brief discussion about the aforementioned "wliereas" clause, and suggestion by Councilmember
Schirnmels that it be removed; it was moved by Councilmember Gothmann rnrd secorrded to strike the
recital: "Whereas the City of Spokane has represenled that i� has negotiated in good faith for the
acquisition of the property identifred in Exhibit A, but the parties are unable to agree upon the purchase
price. " Point of order motion: It was moved by Councilinember Taylor, seca�ded and unanimoutily
passea� to extend the meeting to 9:45 p.m. Mayor Munson invited public comment on the amendment.
Mr. Hite: said he is in Spokane Valley and if we pass this, it will allow the City of Spokane to take him to
court for the part of his property named here only, but it will make all his property unusable; and he asked
what would preclude the City of Spokane from initiating a total take. Citv Attorne,y Connellx said it does
not preclude the City of Spokane from a total take, that it declares it public and necessary and begins the
process of eminent domain; that the City of Spokane could negotiate for wl�atever the parties deern
appropriate.
Brenda Grassel, 14I8 N Woodruff Road: she said that Mr. Hite's company moved their equipment three
years ago and she is in support of him; she feels as a business owner they can't fight with the City of
Spokane; and said the last four years have not shown him fair representation, and he doesn't have the time
to be defending an issue in court when dea(ing with a government entity; and she asked Council to vote
against this ordinance.
The vote by acclamatio�i was una»imously in favor to amend the motion to strike the recital "Whereas the
City of Spokarre has represented that it has negotiated in good faith for the acquisitian of the praperry
i��entified in Exhibit A, but the parties are �uzc�hl� �o agree r�pon the pru•chuse prire. " There �vere nu
further public comments.
Vote on the amended motion to adopt (7rdi�raf7ce 09-007�rovidirrg for tlte acqa�isitio�t by e�rrirlent clomain
of certain Icmds necessary in con�rectiort with the Havcma Street Bridge Project, and to delete the
aforementioned "whereas " recital: In Favor: Mayor Munson, Deputy Mayor Denenny, arid
C"ouncilmembers Schimmels, Taylor, cmd Gothnrcmn. Opposed.• Councilmenrber.s Wilhite and Dempsel�.
Abstentions: None. Motion carriec�
Mayor Munson called for a recess at 9:15 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:22 p.m.
5. First ReadinE Pro�sed Ordinance 09-008 Amending Comp Plan — Mike Basinger
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was nroved by Councilntember "1'a}�lor C7I1CI
seconded to advance Ordr�rance 09-008 to a second readin� After Mr. Basinger's PowerPoint
presentation, there were no council objectians to any of the proposed amendments. Councilmember
Taylar asked about annexation policies and where does this put us in terms of future acquisition areas;
and Mr. Connelly said these changes would allow us to proceed with annexation tivith UGA's. There was
mention of a typographical error on page 1 l, concerning CPA 06-09, the date should be 12/OS/08 instead
of 12I05/09. Councilmember Taylor meationed the community survey taken in 2004, and if there were
any updates to that; with Mr. Basinger responding he would argue we would need another survey. Mayor
Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclanration: In F�.�or:
Uncmimous. Opposed.• none. Abstentiats: �rone. �tlotio» carrie�l
6. First ReadinQ Proposed Ordinance 09-009 Amending Zoning Map — Mike Basin�er
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember i�ilhite a�id
seconded to advance Ordinance 09-009 to a second reading. Mr. Basinger said this ordinance amends the
map by taking the land use designation amendments and putting them into the zoning map. Mayor
Munson invited public comment; no comments tivere offered. Councilmember VVilhite called the question;
Council Re�ular?�ieeting: U�i-l-�-20t)9
Page 12 of 14
Ap}�roved by Council:
DIUi FT
with a unanimous vote in favor of calliog the question. Vote by Acclamation vn the motion to advance 1he
ordinance to a second reading • In Favor: tlnQni�rrou.s. dpposed.• 1Vo�te. Abste�rtiorts: None. Motion
carriecl.
7. First Readin� Proposed Ordinance �9-010 Batch Code Amendments — Christina Janssen
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Taylor cuid
seco�:ded to advarrce Ordinartce 09-OIO to a second reading. There was no Council objections to any of
the proposed amendments. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by
Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.• No�re. Abstentions: None. Motio�i carried
8. First Readin Proposed Ordinance 09-011 Amending SVMC 3.55 — Ken Thompson
After City CIerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Tcr}�lor und
seconded to suspend the rules and adopt Ordinance 09-011. Finance Director Thompson explained that
this is to amend which staff and members of Council can transact city business with our banks as the last
ordinance was passed in 2003 and the names need to be updated; and said there were some changes in tlle
legislation recently so the resolution will be brought back at a later date. Ma�ror Munso� invited publ ic.
comment; no comments were offered. Vote by .Acclamatiorr: In Fuvor.• Unanimous. Opposed.� Norn-.
Abstentiorrs: None. Motion carried.
9. Proposed Resolution 09-004 Amendin� 2009 Transportation Improvement Plan — Neil Kersten/Steve
Worle
It was moved by Cot�rcilmember Taylor c�nd seco�ided to approue Resolutiori 09-D0� for ,4mendme�rt #2
of the 2009 77P as presented by sfaff. Public Works Director Kersten explained that there was nothing
new to add to the presentation given during tonight's public hearing, and he mentioned which projects are
part of the stimulus package. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vorc�
by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.• None. Absterrtions: None. Motion carried.
removed from the agenda.
l 1. Motion Consideration: Interloc,al Agreement with Citv of Spokane regarding Havana Brid�,e — Mike
Connellv
It was moved by Cotmcilmember Taylvr u�7d seconded to outhorize the City 1ti1a�7crger or designee to
execute the interlocal agreement as drafted City Attorney Connelly explained that the agteement takes us
out of the control position and we will not be able to negotiate or approve any settlement or incur any
liability. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: I,i
Favor: Mayor Mimson, Deputy Mayor Denenny, cmd Councilmembers Schimmels, 'laylor cmd Goth,namr.
Opposed.• Councilmembers Wilhite and Dempsey. Abstentions: None. Motiorr carried
12. Motion Consideration: Piaes PCC Intersection Bid Award — Neil Kersten
It was moved by Cotorcilmember Tcrylor arrd seconded to award the Sprague/Pines PCCP h7tersectiar
Project contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Acme Concrete Paving, Irrc., in the amount ��f
$634,428.25. Public Works Director Kersten explained that the bids were all good, that Acme was the
lowest, and that they did the Bowdish intersection last year and did a great job, and that this is well under
budget. Mayor Munson invited public comment; no comm�nts were offered. I��te hy ,-iccl Qlllc71t011: III
Fwor.• U�tanintous. Oppvse�l: : ��QIlE?. . -�b .SIC'lll1011.S: .��Oile. . 'lfotiv�t c�tt•�•iec�
PUBLIC CONIlI�NTS: iVlayor Munson invited general public comment; no comments «�ere offerecl.
_ It was moved by Councilmember Taylor, seconded and u�tcmimously agreed to extend the meeting <<►
10: 00 p.m. Mayor Munson suggested and Council agreed to postpone agenda item � 13 City Finance
101, and agcnda item �1 > to another date; and he thanked I�1s. Beck for her patience
Council Regv{ar Meeting� ()•l-1 •i-?l)()9 !'a:��e 13 ��f i a
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS:
13. Citv Finance l Ol — Dave Mercier (item postponed to a later date)
14. 'I'ourism Promotion Area — Liz Beck
Ms. Liz Beck, General Manager of Super 8, and Chair of the TPA (Tourism Promotion Area)
Commission, mentioned the March 23, 2009 letter concerning increasing the TPA assessment fee on
occupied hotel rooms, raising the fee to $2.00 county-wide; and also mentio�ed the February 26, 2009
letter from Toni Hansen, Executive Director of the Spokane HoteUMotel Association which explains that
the membership formally and unanimously endorsed the motion made in November by the TPA
Commissioners to increase the assessment as noted; that Ms. Beck said they have not received any
negative discussion from any hotel partners; and said she feels the increase won't hurt her business at all.
Regarding the status of an amended interlocal addressing this change, Ms. Beck said Jim Emacio has
prepared the docume�t and a hearing is set before die Board of County Commissioners, and said she
anticipated havi�g the document to Council perhaps by the end of the month. City Attorney Connelly
asked for a copy of the interlocal prior to the Board of County Commissioners passing it; and Mr. Mercier
added that our Council takes affirmative action before execution of a document, said he anticipates that
no activn would be taken until after the public hearing and the Board of County Commissioners adopts
their draft so there won't be multiple drafts.
15. Agenda Items for Tentative Spokane Citv/S�okane Valley Joint Meeting — Mavor Munson
(item postponed to a later date)
INFORMATION ONLY: The ICMA Assessmer�t Update, Spoktme Valley tlrts Council Sculpture
Update, and Edward I3yrne Memoria! Justice Assistarrce Gra�rt (JAG) Agreement were for inforrrration
o�tly a»d K�ere ��ot repor�ed or discrsssec�
EXECUTIVE SESSION: Pendin� Litigation; Land Acquisition
It tivus moved by M�ryor Munson, seconded and uncmimo:�sly agreed to adjourn into Executive Session for
approximately 30 minutes to discuss pending litigation and latd acquisitiorr, and that »o action is
anticipated 1lierea}'ter. Council adjourned into executive session at 9:50 p.m. At 10:21 p.m., Mayor
Munson declared Council out of executive session. It was then moved by Councilmember Gnthmann,
.secnnded and renrnrimor�sly agreed t� adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:22 p.m.
ATTEST:
Richard Munson, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, Cit�� Clerk
Council Regular i��teeting: 0�3-14-2t10� Page 14 of 1=�
Approved by Council:
DRA FT
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, Apri128, 2009
Mayor Munson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and welcomed everyone to the 158th rneeting.
Attendance: Citv Sta/'i:
Rich Munson, Mayor Mike Jackson, Deputy City Manager
Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Bil! Gothmann, Couneilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Directc�r
Steve Ta}�lor, Cou�cilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manager
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Absenl: Diana Wilhite, Cotincilmember John Pietro, Administrative Anal}��t
John Whitehead, Human Resour�cs tilana�er
Lori Barlow, Associate Planner
Deanna Gri�ith, Administrative Assistant
Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
INVOCATION: Pastor Matthew Larson of Good Shepherd Lutherai� Church ga��e tt�e in��ocation.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Munson led the Yledge of Allegiancc.
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Counciirnembers were present except
Councilmember Wilhite. It was moved by Councilmenrber Tcr��lor seco»ded artd tnta�tinrot�sly agr eed to
excuse Councilmemh. er T3'illiite from ton�ght's rneetij�g.
APPROVAI. OF AGFNDA: It �vas moi�er! by Couneilnrember Taylc�r, seconded and u�tanintously
agreed to approve the uge�rda.
INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS �ND PRESENTATIONS: n/a
CONLIVIITTFE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY _REPORTS: In the interest of tim�, tl�i� �tias nc�t
addressed.
Mavor's Report: Mayor Munson read the following Proclamations: Nlunicipal Clerk's V�'eek, Sil��er Star
Banner Day, arid Worker's Memorial Day; and Deputy Mayor Denenny read a proclamation for
Motorcycle Awareoess and Safety Month. Members of the Motorcycle Guild accepted their proclamation.
GENERAL PtIBLIC CONIMEh'TS: �4-ta���r I��1linson invitcd �eneral public comments; no c��mrnent�
«�ere offcred.
1. PUBLIC HEARING SARf' — Scott Kuhta
Mayor Munson opened the public hearing at 6:1 � p.m. and e�plained that each person ���ill be allotted a
maximum of five minutes to speah; and he asked citizens to conduct themselves in an orderly and
respectful man�er; and added that deliberation on the Plan is teotatively scheduled for May 19. Senior
Planner Kuhta �avc �i brief PowerPoini presentati�n explainino the project's �rigin, the ptannin� proc�s�,
Counci! Meeti►rg Mint�t�.�s: 0-�-28-2U09 1'ag� 1 al i
Approved by Courrcil:
DR.-1 �T
mentioned the various public hearin�s and dates of deliberation, mentioned the council's zone district
changes and zone map changes, and other significant changes including those found in the Applicabilit}�
Section, City Center regulations, Pre-located streets, landscaping, signage and Future Street Network.
Mayvr Munson explained that Council would not be asking questions of the public other then clarification
questions, said that the Council is here to listen; and reminded everyone that we will continue to receive
written comments through 5:00 p.m. Friday, May 1. Mayor Munson asked City Clerk Bainbridge if she
had any letters to read, she mentioned she did oot; and Mayor Munson then invited public testimony.
1. Jack Riley, Plantation Restaurant, Vista and Sprague: said he applauds Council for wanting to build a
new city center, but with the current economy ar�d the State's huge deficit, he questioned how we would
spend $40 million especially when faced with the need for a new wastewater treatment plant at an
estimated $200 million; and he rhetorically asked which is rn�re imp�rtant: a cit}' centcr or flushin�
toilets.
2. Art Britton, 18812 E Euclid: said he li��es next door to Gary Schimmels; he appreciated it when the
road open to get through the valley; but said he doesn't kno�v where the money will come from; that we
must have a wastewater treatment plant; that he has a problem with the numerous surveys for a cost of
$2�5,000; and said the County said to keep some for light rail; that he has no use for it so let them built it;
and said he would like to see some of the survey money go to the road fund instead of surver•s all tl�e
time; and he mentioned his property ta.� valuation ��•ent up 64%.
3. I�ave Ochoa, 1 1616 F.1�'Iain A��enue: said his conc�rn is the cc�uplet; he s�id it ���c�rks, he likes it, and h�
hasn't spoken to anyone who doesn't like it; said it will be expensive to change it to two-»-ay, and once
the population grows, we will have to tear it up and make it one way again.
4. Terry Lynch, President, Spokane Valley Business Association, Board of Directors: read his written
comments: that the Spokane Valley Business Association Board of Directors asked him to speak on their
behalf; tliat a report produced by Gonz�ga Universit}� concludes that the property values, rental rates and
businesses in general have suffered with the one-u�ay; that it is his Board's position that in changing back
to a two-way, the injustice made to those businesses along that portion will finally be rectified; and ti�at
after the County changed it, it became a one-way to Spokane, encouraging traffic to go directly to
downtown; he said if, in his thirty-eight years as ov��ner-operator of the Park Lane Motel and RV Park, he
had experienced a one-way going to Spokane from the Valley, his business would have failed; and said a
two-way road is critical to small businesses; and that the SVBA believes the change to one way was a
mistake; and he urged Council to move fonvard �vith the changing one-way on Sprague to a two-way
route, tbus making it our Main Street once again.
5. Joe Jovanovich, General Manager of Walt's Mailing Ser said wz pledged allcgiacice to the �las�
tonight, and he asked that Council thinl: about liberty and justice for all, and said this plan doesn't
represent that and it made him disappointed in American to take away the future possibility of a land
owner and give it away; that supporters of this plan are rushing into a mine field; and in reading from his
written comments, said that "I predict that this attempt to drive unwanted, self aggrandizing development
from the top down will meet the same fate as so much Soviet era planning ... miles of abandoned
properties that once were viable, famity-owned, small town businesses." He said he pleads that Council
not support the plan; or put the plan to a vote of the people.
6. Duke Vierth, 202 N McDonald: said he was informed this communily is $9 million in debt; doesn't
l:now if it's true; but said he doesn't feel $40 million for a new community center is something �ve should
do; said his street is beginning to fall apart and he has appealed to the City to please come out and oil the
cracks in the street and he heard the City does not have the money, yet he said he saw AAA Street
S�vee�er� sev eral tim<< hc slid ���e need to take carc of our roads and that he is bzginnit�g t�� fc�l this
Counci! Meeting t4linutes: 0-i-2b'-24ti9 YuKe.� ? c�j i
,4pproveaf bi�� Courrcil:
DRAFT
Council is taking direction from the Governor of the State. Couocilmember Taylor responded that the
City's debt is $0.7 million and the other debt is bonds for CenterPlace, which was paid for via voter
approved sales tax at the same time the incorporation was approved.
7. Phillip Rudy, 5647 N Fruithill Road, and Chair of the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber: said he
�vatched the efforis to thoroughly review the details of this plan; that the Chamber representatives
attended many public meetings, and he commends Council for the diligence and attention to detail; and
thtinked Council for listening to the public and making changes, that it demonstrates a diligence to
constituents. He said the Chamber is also pleased the final street map has fewer pre-located streets which
could affect property values; and when property is developed, a case could be made as long as it follows
the criteria; he said the Chamber recommends a change for nonconforming use of a property: that now
Spokane Valley Municipal Code Title 19.20.060 allows legal nonconforming uses and structures after
becoming unoccupied for a maximum period of twelve consecutive months; and said for the plan
boundaries, they recommend that be extended to thirty-six months to protect the interest of property
owners on the corridor who are attempting to rent, or lease their facility; that twelve months is a specia]
hardship on owners of single use businesses like restaurants. Dr. Ruby said he ���ill submit his personal
cornments in «�ritings later hut these are the comments from 1hc Chari�be►
8. Mike King, 930U E Sprague: said he is a nicmber of tiie Ghamb�r �f C '��T�nierce anJ I3oard of
Directors; that this is not a road issue, but is a twenty to thirty-year plan to revitalization the core of'
Spokane Valley and create a city center, which will increase the tax base as it is eventually developed; it
will create larger tax revenues; and the improvements will make this a more successful and workable
plan; that the Chamber's Task Force helped to make this a successful plan, and for the most part, changes
over time «�ill be slowly by the developer for the individual properties and not on tl�e citizens; that this
Plan is a blueprint to follow and is a long term plan; and that the thirty-six months' relief is justified; he
said the different Zoning is not a down zoning and it will signifcantly increase the property use and help
the vacated lands; and he urged Council to vote on this.
9. Susan Scott, said she is the a�vner of one of the properties that �vill be euthanized by the down zoning;
and said when that happens in the name of revitalization, she asked how many business uses will be
nonconforming by this plan; that the Pian has an economic impact; that she was told people can alway�
make a request for a zone change: after hiring an attorney, and going through the detailed and
burdensome process along with the $850 fees and hearings, on the chance the current zoning will be
restored; she said this is not consistent with the comp plan and this isn't how property rights are protected
when the fox is in charge of the henhouse; she said people are afraid to speak up about changes; she has
seen overzealous code enforcement; and subjective direction given to the Community Development
Director which will make the plan worse; that the process has contradictory statements and is inconsistent
��•ith rublic comments; and she said tu scrap the �lan, cut the lusses, and continuc ���ith the comp plan.
10. Jim Giles, 719 S McKinnon Road: said �vhen the road was first changed to one ��ray one person on a
motorcycle was killed; and two years after it �vas changed, a person going the wrong way was injurecl;
said he didn't think it was a good idea before but now switching it back wiil cause some of those
problems again; and one-way on one part and two-way on others will be a lot of confusion.
1 l. Dean Grafos, 16120 E Sprague, and owner of property at 15813 E Sprague Avenue, said in readin�
l�is written comments, that this letter is follow up to a letter written on his behalf by land use attorneti�
Stacy Bjordahl; said they are opposed to the implementation of the plan; that it is harmful to most of lhe
property owners i� the corridor while enriching a small, select, special interest few; that for his properties
it violates the GMA and is an arbitrar}� and discriminatory action as it is down zoning and will create
hundreds of non-conforming businesses along the corridor and is an action that should not be taker�
lightly by res�onsible local officiats; the existing businesses will become non-conforming makin�►
Cotnlci! Aleetin� Alinz�t�:s: 0-� I'cr�� 3 of i
Approved by� Council:
DRA FT
rcfinancing, borrowing or selling the property� difficult; and said one of the goals of the G:�4A is and
should be the protection of individual property rights.
12. Sean Lumsden, 910 W Garland: said he represents the Auto Row Dealers; he submitted a letter about
a week ago with a few requests; he wants a change in the size of the gateway commercial district in one
specific area; said all new car franchises are beholding to their parent franchise requirements concerning
how buildings look; that perhaps there could be a permit process so franchisees can say the changes are
coming from the parent company; and he said he would make a bold prediction and guesses that people
don't �vant to pay more property taxes; he asked how we are going to fund city hall or further programs
like the wastewater treamlent plant; and he submitted it would be funded with property taxes or retail
sales tax, and said that auto row has the opportunity to draw people from all over the region; that as
people make their second largest purchase, they would leave us their retail sales tax; that the plan can be
funded through retail sales t.�x by maximizing the opportunities of the auto dealers which will benefit all
businesses; and said we need to plant a field before building a barn; and we will have an opportunity to
fill the city coffers to fund whatever might need to be funded, further down the road.
13. Julie Lehman, 12605 E 4`�': said she is against the plan and feels we should not go forwaru without
voter approval; that elected officials are representatives of constituents and are not in office to put forward
their own ideas and weren't elected as paternalistic decision makers; that Gouncil's duty is to do what the
citizens want is best and they cannot know that without bringing this to a vote; that the Plan incorporatcs
such vast changes to affect so many's property rights that it needs to be brought forward to the people.
14. Mary Pollard, 17216 E Baldwin: said she is speaking for the Nord� Greenacres Neighborhood; that
she believes this is a bad policy especially in these economic times; that GMA is not an open mandate to
recreate the business district and the life of the citizens but is concerned about job pratection and il is
about the citizen's taxes; that she hasn't found anyone in her community who thought this was a good
idea and auto row and onl}� a few others will benefit from this plan; that this is "nothing short of'
environmental psychosis ... and would be violating Anti-Trust laws .. and the Sherman Act." She
advised not e�tending Appleway beyond the University area; slie said to keep several lanes from
Evergreen to Sullivan as reducing tra�ic lanes will create failed traffic at intersectio�s; that we can't
create more easVwest roads due to the topographic limitations of the valley; during I-90 construction or
accidents, traffic �vill need these alternative roads; that Pines and Sullivan are "pretty much failed" and
she said she can't image getting rid of two more lanes of traffic; that there is a severe economic
downtown now and it will create a tax revenue deficit; that you can't ask people to change their business;
they can't sell it and they won't benefit from other uses; she mentioned that the Valley Mall filed
bankruptcy; and in 2004 people �veren't really paying attention to the new city but people weren't sho�vn
other choices; a�d she said Council needs to respect people's dreams.
15. Karla Kaley, said she o��vns a property management company here; that she loves the Pacific
Northwest and loves the area; she invested her life's worth in real estate in Spokane Valley because of
what it promised to offer in serving so many communities; but said she has grave concems about
changing from the multiple lane single direction as it is now a nicely designed thoroughfare which serves
many of the needs of the downtown area; and said if we increase traffic congestion the communities we
serve will find other easier ways to do businesses, such as taking I-90; and if we make it more difficult for
people to access us, it will facilitate them shopping off interstate interchanges; that she is against
changing the traffic patterns; that it is important for cities to have identifi�s; a�d we need to make sure we
represent ourselves well and look at who we serve.
1 b. Lynn Plaggemeier, 11708 E 19` said one of the reasons the citizens voted to become a city ���as that
we weren't gettiog a fair shot and a fair vote from the county; that this issue should be brought to the
voters and he asked where is the money coming from; he said if we are looking at an En��ironmental
C'oui�rill�leeli�rg hlinule•.5: O-I-Z�S-2009 1'n�e -1 nf "
t(ppr�i�ed hti' C'ou�rcil �
DRA FT
Impact Statement, that could go on for years; said he hasn't seen a SEPA checklist; }�et people feel this is
a done deal; and he mentioned a sign for "Cit}� Hall" along the area of University, and asked if we have
already bought that? Mayor Munson explained that the sign be described is just a directional sign.
17. Dan Geiger, 118 S Pines Road: said that this is a complex plan; that he read some of it but not all; said
he bought his property about three years ago; it is commercial and has been zoned commercial since 1948
when it was built; but said that under this plan it would be downzoned to residential over time; a�d he
said he realizes that as long as be keeps his business, there is no problem, but eventualty it will be
downzoned; he said he's not sure it makes sense to have residential there, and he would like Council tc�
consider that beforz mal;in` that change as it is a serious thing to do to sc�meone's propert}.
l�. Jim Nelson, o�vns Leo's Photo�raph on Apple�vay and Farr: said ihe plan 1111�?aCtS Ililll and that
returning to two, two-ways instead of the one way is a bad idea for safety and money reasons; he said lie
feels we need to move traffic and to get to the city center area can only be done with good flowing roads;
and said that half of his building is residential and half isn't and that he would like to see that streets are
getting prettier, and mentioned he would also like to see sign regulations a little tighter.
19. Kathy Bonin 2803 S Bowdish Road: she stated that now is a bad time to move forward witt�
something like this; that there are many people aut of work; the Valley Mall filed for bankruptcy; and it is
not a good time to do this or raise taxes as people can't aflord it; and g�irig back into ri��� wa��s is a bad
idea, and she su�gested �uttin4 it t�� the E�eople's ��ote.
20. Dean Davenport, 1���U E Lv�rett: said he doesn't unc�erstand tl�� reaso�� uf the couplct; with pcople
going broke we don't need a new city hall; he suggested we just take out the curbing in front of Super
Supplements and let the peQple go tbrough; to leave it the way it is and open the traffic going eastbounci
and that will take care of the problem; he suggested we turn it back around and tFilce the curb out and turn
the lights back around and paint the lines back the way they were.
21. Bob Blum, 12722 E 15�': said it appears d�ere are a lot of people doing some posturing about
economic times and he asked Council to be cautious; that the road is now a quick way to get home; he
likes travelling that way; he suggested having an updated traffic count to confirm which way the traffic
moves; mentioned that when snow is piled up as it was last �vinter that we lose a lane; and again stated he
�vould like to see Appleway stay the way it is now.
22. Kermit Anderson, 7108 E 2° stated that this plan is huge and he heard it could take twenty to thirt��
years; that it should be called re-zoning and not revitalization; that he has a business at the west end c�t'
tliis plan next to the freeway and it doesn't fit the plan and is not the kind of business we want; but said l�e
realizes it will probably be grandfathered in; but said if he wants to expand it will probably have to
conform but he doesn't know what it would have to conform to, and he asked if people will be hanging in
limbo for twenty to thirty years while this plan is being fulfilled; and he asked why we are doing this
gigantic thing; said he's opposed to this plan and is pretty happy with the valley the way it was; that
Sprague goes through a down period as seen in the past; and is iike Havana which is coming back; and
said this will discourage and affect a lot of businesses who have been there; and said that people put a lot
of money into their plans.
23. Nancy Nishimura, 1 S 103 E. �'alley V4'ay; said she owns Grr;r;n Thumb Nursery; that she is opposed to
the �'lan as it currently is, and as explained in her written letter, she said it calls for businesses along
Sprague to change their current configurations and relocate the buildings to the curb area with parking at
the rear, the plan calls for the redirection of the business district, calls for rezoning commercial property,
calls for rezoning business property from commercial to residential for the Appleway Couplet but does
not actuallv own the land: and said that this cinr and this Plan really don't need or want her business or
Council Meetingl�linutes: 0-1-?5-2009 �'�S� � �.1��
Approved by Council:
DR9 FT
her; that she made an effort to some�vl�at participate in government, but in the end felt like a fool paying
taxes to this city; and said she will work hard to make sure this plan does not come into being as it
curcently is; that it seems to be out of touch with the reality of this community; and having a city center is
one thing, but redirecting the entire Sprague corridor is not feasible.
24. Tony Lazanis, E Empire Way: said we have wasted enough money on studies as the valley never will
be what we are planning to do as we don't have the money; that he woutd like to see Sprague two ways
again; it would help businesses and people.
25. Grant Rodkey, 11524 E 24`� Avenue: said this idealistic street plan is similar to the Riverstone
Development in Coeur d'alene which is loosing its anchors as they're backing out; he said something t��
keep in mind is we like the view of the mountains; and we don't want to create a claustrophobic affect
when drawing buildings close up to the road; that changing the road back will create congestion; and said
he doesn't even drive on that; and said there should be a public vote on this issue as it affects the quantit��
of taxpayer's dollars and it will be the people who will bear the burden; that this is the least representative
body and said Council doesn't seem to take into account what the majority want; that he hopes it will
change over time and if not, there is a petition that may change that; and said that it is not easy to cross
tr�c; said he hopes this will continue to be a representative body, but when Sue Scott calmly went
through her presentation, asking her to sit down is an example of the censorship of her view and that tl�is
is the kind of thing that leads to totalitarian thinking and he's opposed to that.
26. Jim Dempsey, 4518 S Bowdish Road: said he has an apartment building along the Appleway pruject;
tt�ere is some possibility he'd want to change that and add some more units and apparently it fits in the
plan; said he doesn't pay sales ta�►es so he won't contribute much to the $40 mitlion price tag; mentioned
that Home Base went out of business ten years ago and it took nine years to find another to come in and
use that; that we scnt $400,000 to see if this was a viable business corridor and it seems the market is
speal:ing loud and clear that people want to build elsewhere; he said he is concerned the City might be
involved in tal:ings in terms of guiding development and business money and said businesses a�1d
developers go where they want and you can't force them or guide them to come if they don't want to; and
said that the businesses on Sprague pre-date the city; he sees disincorporation signs around; so they'll
likely be there longer then the city of Spokane Valley.
Mayor Munson invited fucther public comment; no comments were of�ered and Mayor Munson clused tlle
public hearing at 7:42 p.m.
2. CONSFNT AGENDA Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. ,A
Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
a. Claim Vouchers:
VOUCHER LIST DATE WNOUCHER NUMBERS: TOTAL AMOUNT
04/ 10/2009 17065 — 17092 $40,224.74
04/14/2009 17094 — 17132; 3022009; 406090008 $1,525,732.67
04/17/2009 17136 — 17169 $115,746.28
GRAND TOTAL �1,681,703.69
b. Payrall for pay period ending April 15, 2009: $264,012.57
c. Approval of Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Agreeme��t
d. Approval of April 7, 2009 Study Session Meeting Minutes
1! was nroved by Cou�icilmember Taylor, seco�lded a»d immrinrot�sh� agree�f to approl�e the Cu�isc�rlt
Agendcx.
Counci! �feeting A-ti�iutc�s� U4-2�-?U09 f'��� � �j� %
.9pproved bi� Council:
DRA FT
ADNiINISTRATIVE REPORT
3. Spra� e/Ap lp ewa,y Revitalization Plan - Councilmembers
Mayor Munson mentioned the upcoming meetings where this Plan wilt be discussed and deliberated
upon; and said the public will have further opportunity to comment when the ordinances for the plan are
considered for adopiion, which is scheduled for later this summer, tentatively set for May 26; and said
setting this for later May will give staf�time to put together all the comments made tonight as well as the
written comments we might received through Frida}�; and said that tlle deliberation of this Plan is
tentatively set for May l9.
PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Munson invited general public comments; no comments were offered.
INFORMATION ONLY: The Spokane Valley Fire first quarter report, and the various department
reports were for information only and were not discussed or reported.
Ea�CUTIVE SESSION: nla
There being no further business, it i��as moved b}� C�imrilmenrber Tavlor, si�cnnded ajicl unrntimouslt�
agreed to acijoz�rn. The meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m.
A7'I�EST: Richard Munson, '��1a��or
Christine Bainbridge, Cit�� Cler�:
Cou,rcil ,tIE�.�ri�i� Afi,r:�r�7s� r-,-'�4-?r)U9 Pl��t �' ��l �
Appraved ht� C�crircil:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
�eeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report � pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-008, Comprehensive Plan Amendments
(includes text and map amendments)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A (Growth Management Act)
PREVtOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: �n April 14, 2009, Council deliberated on comprehensive plan
amendments CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09.
BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs
from November 2 to November 1 of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications
received prior to the November 1 deadline in late winter/early spring of the following year, with a
recommendation to City Council in late spring/early summer.
All parts of the Comprehensive Plan (maps and text) can be amended during the annual cycle. The
Community Development Department received one site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment; city
staff initiated three site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendments. Sites that are approved for a
�;omprehensive Plan Map amendment automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the
�w Comprehensive Plan Map designation.
Additionally, staff initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; Chapter 3—
Transportation; Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan 8� Public Service; and Chapter 8— Natural Environment.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan amendment proposals are
organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, and letters submitted to date
to assist the City Council's review.
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made
recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. Further research
was requested on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09. On March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission held a hearing
and made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09.
OPTIONS: Adopt Ordinance 09-008; remand to Planning Commission for further consideration; or conduct a
public hearing on proposed deviations from the Planning Commission's recommendation.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Move to adopt Ordinance 09-008.
STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior
Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance
Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation
1of1
i
�
i
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHIIr'GTON
ORDINANCE NO. 09-008
AN URDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOI�:ANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 06-010 ADOPTING THE CITY OF
SPO�:ANE VALLEY COMPREHENSI�E, PLAN AND PROVIDING FOR 01fHER
MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO.
V�HEREAS, through Spokane Valley Ordi.nance 06-010, the City of Spokane Valley
adopted L�and Use plans and regulations as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital
Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valley; and
S, the Washington State Growth Nianagement - Act (GMA) allows
comprehensive plans to be amended annually (RCW 36.70A130); and �,,
�'VHEREAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Va�ley Compreheusive Plan may be
initiated by the Plann.ing Commission (Comrnission), the City Council (Counc�l) or by the
Community Development Director based on citizen requests or when changed conditions
wanant adjustments; and
,.
WHEREAS, the GMA requires comprehensive plans to be implemented with
development regulations, including the zoning of property consistent with land use map
designations; and ; ;�: � .
�: ,. .
VVHEREAS, consisterit w,�ith the GMA, City of Spokane Valley adopted Public
Participation Guidelines to direct ��the public involvement process for adopting and amending �
�,
comprehensive plans; and ; '�' �;t��
- - �
� �.
WHEREAS, the Spokane Va11ey Municipal Code provides that amendment applications
shall be received until November'l . of each year; and
� ,
-�WHEREAS, appli�cations were� submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to
amend the��' Comprehensive � Pl,an an� Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficially using the
, ,
property described herein; and��:',
i'� ,
WHEREAS; �following the application to the City, staf� conducted an environmental
review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amend.ments; and
:�
WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued Determinations
of Nonsignificance (DNS) on December 19, 2008 for the proposals, published the DNS in the
Valley News Herald on December 19, 20U8, and where appropriate posted the DNS on the sites
and mailed the DNS to all affected public agencies; and
,
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic
Development was notified on Februaiy 27, 2009 pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 providing a 60-
day notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and
�
Orrlin$nce 09-048 Comp Plan Amendments Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a briefing on February 26, 2009, to review the
proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, notice of the Commission public hearing was published i.n the Valley News
Herald on February 20, 2009; and
W�-�REAS, on February 20, 2009, noti.ce of the Commission hearing was mailed to all
property owners within 400 feet of the subject properkies ; and
WHEREAS, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2049 at which
time the Commission received evideace, information, public :testimony ; and a staff report and
recommendation; and - � � ,
, ;.
r
�;;
WHEREAS, the Commission, at the conclusion of the public hearing and after.,�
deliberating on the proposed amendments and information presented during the course of the
hearing developed reeommendations on site-specific rnap atnendments CPA-02-09 through
CPA-44-09. Further research was requested on site-specific map amend.ment CPA-01-09 and
CPA-OS-09. The Commission made recommendations on teh~t amendments CPA-06-09 through
CPA-08-09. The Commission requested minor changes to the Public/Quasi-Public provisions in
CPA-OS-09. The Commission continued the.public hearing to March 26, 2009 for CPA-01-09
and CPA-OS-09; and : �
WHEREAS, the Commission delibera�ed - on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09 on March 26,
2009; the Commission r,ecom.mendecl approval o'f� amendment proposals; and
V
�
� :
W�-IEREAS, on March 31, 2009, Council reviewed the Commission's recommendations
on the proposed Comprehensive:Plan �amendments; and
Vi�'��REAS, on April 14,�2009, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed amendments; and . , ;' -. ;
. ,
WHEREAS, on May ;� 2, 2009, Council considered a second ord.inance reading at which
ti.me Council approved writ'ten findings of fact setting forth their basis for approval of the
proposed amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordai.n as
follows: �
Section 1. �.s�. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend th� Comprehensive
Plan adopted through Ordinance No. 06-�10.
Section 2. indin s. The City Council acknowledges that the Comrnission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the �
Ordinance 09-008 Com� Plan Amendments Page 2 of 6
Comprehensive Plan aad approves the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and text.
The City Council hereby adopts the Commi�sion's findings, specifically that:
1. Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on
February 20, 2009 and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a
descripdon of the proposal.
2. Individual notice of the map amendment proposals was mailed to all property owners withi.n 400
feet of each effected site.
3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21 C) environmental checklists
were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendmen�
4. Staff reviewed the environmental checkli.sts and a threshold deterinination was made for each
comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Non-si�nificance (DNS) w+ere
issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on December 19, 2008.
5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on December 19, 2008 consistent
with the Cifiy of Spokane Valley Envirovmental Ordinance. �.
6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to
consider the proposed amendments. After hearing;'public te�timony, the Commission made
recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04=09 an CPA=06-09 through`CPA-08-09,
excluding CPA-O l-09 and CPA-OS-09. ���,
�, -
7. The Commission continued the public hearing for CPA-01=09,and CPA-OS-09 to March 26,
2009.
8. On March 26, 2009, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09.
9. The planning goals of the Growth Nianagenlent '_Act (GMA) were considered an.d the
proposed amendments are consistent with'thc GM�1.
10. The goals and policieS "of the Spokane Valley "Comprehensive Plan were considered and the
proposed amendmerits are consistent with the ;Comprehensive Plan.
11. The proposed land ; use and ioning designations are consistent with the current use of the
properties. � , '
12. Find.ings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria !
contained�in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendment and area-wide rezones)
of the�,Spokan� Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). I
13. The Gomprehensive Plan ,L�nd Use Map and text amendments will not adversely affect the
public's general healt�l, safety, and �velfare.
,.
,.
. �,
Sectian 3: Pro �. The properties subject to this Ord.inance are described in
,
Attachment ��A:" � �.
, ,.
e don 4. �tComprehensive Plan A.�endments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, is
hereby amended as set forth in Attachments "A" and "B". The Comprehensive Pl�
Amendments are generally described as foUows:
Map Amendments (Attachment A)
File No. CPA-01-09:
Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to chaage the designation
on parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and
45242.9057 from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential.
Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 3 of 6
Applicant: Ben Goodmansen, Whipple Consulting Engiaeers; 2528 North Sullivan Road; Spokane �
Valley, WA 99216
Amendment Location: Parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050,
45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057; located oa the south side of 4`� Avenue botweea Sullivan Road '
and Conklin Road; fwther located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25
North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington.
Conncil Decision: Change Parcels 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051,
45242.9056 and 45242.9057 to High Deasity Residential. Chang� Parce145242.9032 to Medium Density
Residcntial.
:.; ..
File No. CPA
Application/Descrlption of Propo�al: City initiated site specific Coinprehensive Plan map amendment
on parcels 45242.1002 and �5242.1006 from High Density Residentia] (HDR) to Neighborhood
Commercial (NC). � , :
Appllcant: City of Spokane Valley, 1] 707 E Spra�ue Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: The northeast corner of 4 Avenue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242.1002 and
45242.1006, addressed as 315 and 325 South Sullivan Roa'd; further located in the N�V'/a of the NW'/. of
�,,:.
Section 24, Township 2� North, Range 44 East, Willamette �Zeridian,,Spokane County, Washington.
Counsel Decision: Change to Neighborhood Commercial (I\'C) .
File No. CPA-03-09:
Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Office (0) to
Community Commercial (CC) on six (6) parcels composing approximately 3.5 acres of land.
Applicant: City of Spokane Vall�y�, 11707 E Spra�ue A}��, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: The proposal is located betweeq Mullan Road and Argonne Road from the
north side of Boone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specif cally located in the SE'/� of Section
17, Township 25 North, Range 44, East VVillamette Nieridian, Spok�r►e Valley, Washington
Council Decision: Change to Community Com�mercial (C)
File No. CPA-04-09 ' �
Applicat�onlDescript'ro� of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from
Community, Cornmercial (CC) to Lo�v Density� Residential (LDR) on approximately .47 acres of land.
Applicant: � City of Spokane Valley, E Sprague Ave, Ste lOb, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Locadon: The,proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of
Sprague A��enue on the oast side �of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE '/. of Section 14,
Township 25 North, Range 44 Easf Willamette Meridian, Spokaae Valley, Washington.
Council Decision:. Change to Low• Density Residential (LDR)
,..,,,
; i , :> ,''
File No. CPA-OS-09: ��';,`.. `
Application/De,gcrlptioii of Proposal: A City inidated text amendment to Chapter 2— Land Use. The
amendment updates Table 2.1 with aew land quantity analysis iafonnation; updates/adds annexation
goals, policies and text. The amendment also evaluates all properties designa.ted public/quasi-public and
proposes aa appropriate land use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the
property.
Applicant: City of Spokane Valiey, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Locatlon: Text amendmenis to Chapter 2— Land Use will have city-wide implications.
Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city.
Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 6
Council Dec�s�on: Adopt Teat amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; eliminate the
public/qnas� pablic land usc designation and change to land use designations consi�tent
with surrounding designations.
File No. CPA-06-09
ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3— Transportation: Add text for new
biks classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or will be by the end of the construction season:
- Montgomery from Woodruffto University
- V�'ellesley from Evergreen to Progress
- Mansfield from Montgomery to SR 27 �
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 9920b
Amendment Location: Te�rt amendments to Chapter 3— Transportation v��ill have city-wide
i.mplications. �
� ,��:
Conncil Decision: Adopt teat amendments to Chapter 3 Transportation.
,. ,
�_.
,�:.
File No. CPA-U7-09 �
Application/Description of Prnposal: Text amendment to Chapter��4 — Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and
Public Services: Update the 6-year Transportation Impro'vement Plan ,(TIP); update Water Districts &
Wellheads map; update Parks & Recreation map; update 6-y�ear Setiver map; add annexation area level of
service language:
Applicant: City of Spvkane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 105; Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Locat�on: Te�ct amendments to'Chapter 4— CFP & Public Services will have city-wide
;:, , _
implicatioas. �.
�, .
PC Recommendation: Adopt teat amend �to Cb�apter 4-- & Public Services.
� �� i ,
�; � ' " '
�`ile No. CPA-08-09 - � �i..� �' � i�;
Application/Descriptiou of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 8— Natural Environme�at: update `
Wetlands map; update,Fish & Wildlife Habitat map. �'
Applieant: City of Spoka�e Valley, ] 1707 E Sprague Ave,� Ste 106, Spokane Valiey, WA g9206
: �,
Amendment Location: Text �amendments to Chapter ,8 �= Natural Environment will have city-wide
implications. . �
PC Recommendation: Adopt teact,amendments to Chapter 8 Natural Environment.
Comprebensive Plan Te�.t Amendments (Attachment B). Chapter 2 Land Use; Chapter 3 —
Transportation� Chaptez 4=.f Capital �'acilities Plan & Public Services; and Chapter 8— Natural
Environment.) � � � �
,� '�� :�
,,;,� .
Section 5. ``�, ; Compiehensive Plan - Copies on Fi1e-Administrative Action. The '
Comprehensive Plan�'(�vith Maps) is maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well, as the City
Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of
thi.s Ordinance, is auttiorized to modify the Comprehensive Plan in a manner consistent with this
�rdinance.
ection 6. Liabili . The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the
responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit
applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent
to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any
particular class of ind.ividuals or organ.izations.
Ordinance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 5 of 6
e tion 7. Severabilitv. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance ,
shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such '
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 8. �ffective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5)
days after publication of this Ordinance or a sumnaary thereof in the official newspaper of the
City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. �,
�
,
PASSED by the City Council this day of Ma .20 9: :.
�' Q .;, ;.,:
�, � ���` T.
�
, ;:
� � '�'-'�„� -
Mayor, Richard Munson - µ'?�.
�:� ;�;: , , rf
,..
ATTEST: � ,' ��; ` _ ; ,
E�;. ,•
r�• ►• � �
;_,�.��
� ��,.
.���,.
•� . ,,r
i, ..;,i..
`'ti�'v ��li'�.
City Clerk, Christine Ba.inbridge �;��: ;�-
�., :�: .� '='�.-;, ,.
��t� � �,��� :,� �� ,�, -
Approved As To Form: � , � � " _ -;,;�,,�
� �';'�'r ;�..,
' � '�''�`��":;�:: ; t- .
, 1 ���; :���,,
t;I^
� �,}• �`�:''�
` �C�'=
Office of the City Attorney �'�. �
�� �.
Date of Publication: - , ��~;s_ -
,.. ,
;��,, � ;�,
Effective Date: , :. ��, _;: •� .:�„ -�� ,
'� ��!;� `ii i '.� .
�. .
�
. �;:,
. , ��;�,�;; �!:';� ;�.
- :��'��,\;_ `,:•:?r.
� �-:. � 1
�iu �' f �,��ti. i '.
' ���'t� _ _ �'� � j'j•
�J`;�;t`.,.� ,
`�:It;E�; �•
}� ��,j
��I� :�
, S't:�
l `�t'"
. , `. • � '`� �
' ��. `r � . �: �,
';.y;•r ��'i
' !�' •
� , �i • . •
Ordi.nance 09-008 Comp Plan Amendments Page 6 of 6
i
�
I
.
�
�
• �
i
I
�11 I 1 1 ( d �\� �--�
� ol�an�
�
V�lle �
�
11707 E Spra�ue Ave Suite 10b • Spokane Valley WA 99106
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921,1008 ♦ cityhallOspokanevalley.org
emoran um
To: Mayor and City Councilors
From: lan Robertson, Chair • Spokane Valley Planning Commissfon
Date: April 14� 2009
Re: Plannii�g Commission Findings and Recommendation: CPA-01-09 through CPA•08-09
BACKGROUND
The Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC 17.80.140) includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from
November 2" to November 1 of the following year. Applications received prior to November 1 are
considered by the Planning Commission in late spring af the following year, with a decision by City Council in
late springlearly summer.
Al( parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development
Department received one request for a site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment. The City initiated
three siie-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendments and initiated a number of Comprehensive Plan text
amendments. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendrnent wil! automatically receive a
zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation. Text amendments are propased to
Chapter 2— Land Use; Chapter 3— Transportation; Chapter 4— Capita! Facilities Plan & Public Service; and
Chapter 8— Natural Environment. A majority of these amendments are relatively minor in nature and update
or correct information. More substantive amendments are being recommended to Chapter 2— Land Use and
Chapter 4— Capital Facilities Plan & Public Service. Amendments to these chapters add annexation goals and
policies, and annexation area leve) of service language.
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider the
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map and text. After hearing public testimony,
the Commission made recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-
09. The Commission continued the public hearing to March 26, 2009 to allow for further research on CPA-01-
09 and CPA-05-Q9 On March ?_6, 2009, the Planning Commission made recommendaiions on CPA-01-09
and CPA-05-09.
The Planning Commission's findings an� recommendat�on on CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09 are summarized
below.
FINDINGS
1. Notice for the proposeJ ar7�endme��ts was place� in the Spokane ValJey News Herald on February 20,
2009 and each site was posted with a°Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a description of the proposal.
2. Individual nofice of the site-specific map amendment proposals were mailed to all property owners within
400 feet of each affected site.
1 cf 4
3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21 C) environmental checklists were
required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text amendment.
4. Staff reviewed the environmentai checkiists and a threshold determination was made for each
comprehensive plan amendment. Determinations of Non-significance (DNS} were issued for the requested
comprehensive plan amendments on December 19, Z008.
5. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on December 19, 2008 consistent wi#h the City of
Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance.
6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on March 12, �009, to consider the
proposed amendments. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-
02-09 through CPA-04-09 and CPA-06-09 through CPA-08-09. Further research was requested on CPA-
01-09 and CPA-05-09.
7. The Commission continued the public hearing for CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09 to March 26, 2009. On
March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-05-09.
RECOMMENDATtON
File No. CPA-01-09:
Application/Descriptlon of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation on
parcels 45242.9032, 4524Z.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and
45242.9057 from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential with a corresponding zoning change
from Single-family Residential District (R-3) to Multi-family High Density Residential District (MF-2).
Applicants:
Marie Olbricht; 15710 East 4�' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037
Braok and Jody Kamp; 12110 East 10`� Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 89206
Joy Swenson; 15808 East 4`" Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037
Dennis Crapo; 15321 East Mission Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037
Christine Kimball; 15714 East 4�'' Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99037
Amendment Location: Located on the south side of 4�' Avenue betweEn Sullivan Road and Conklin Road;
further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East,
Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington.
PC Recommendation: Change parcels 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9036, 45242.9057, 45242.905fi�
45242.9035� and 45242.9033 to High Density Residential (HDR) and zone to Multifamlly High Density
Residential District (MF-2) and change parcel 45242.9032 to Medium Density Residential (MDR) and
zone to Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1)
File No. CPA-02-09:
ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment on
parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006 from High Density Residential (HDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC);
corresponding zoning map amendment from Mulii-family High Density Residenba! (MF-2) to Neighborhood
Commercial (NC).
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: The northeast corner of 4` Avenue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242.1002 and
45242.100G, addressed as 315 and 325 South Sul(ivan Road; further located in the NW %, of the NW'/4 of
Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington.
PC Recommendation: Change to Neighborhood Cornmercial (NC) and zone to Neighborhood
Commercial (NC)
2 of 4
File No. CPA-03-09:
ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from �ffice (0) to Community
Commercial (CC); corresponding zoning map amendment from Office (0) to Community Commercial (C) on
six (6) parceis composing approximately 3.5 acres of land.
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: The proposal is located between Mu(lan Road and Argonne Road from the north side
of Boone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specifically located in the SE'/. of Section 17, Township
25 North, Range 44, East 1Nillamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington
PC Recommendation: Change to Community Commercial (C) and zone to Community Commercial (C)
Fi1e No. CPA-04-09
ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from Community
Commercial (CC) to Low Density Residential (LDR); corresponding zoning map amendment from Community
Commercial (C) to Single-family Residential Urban District (R-4) on approximately .47 acres of land.
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: The proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of
Sprague Avenue on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE % of Section 14 Township
25 North, Range 44 East Willarnette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington.
PC Recommendation: Change to Low Density Residential (LDR) and zone to Single-family Residential
Urban (R-4)
File No. CPA-05-09:
Application/Description of Proposal: A City initiated text amendment to Chapter 2- Land Use. The
amendment updates Table 2.1 with new fand quantity analysis information; updates/adds annexation goals,
policies, and text. The amendment also evaluates all prope�ties designated public/quasi-public and proposes
an appropriate land use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property.
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2- Land Use will have citywide implications.
Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city.
PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 2- Land Use as proposed by staff.
File No. CPA-06-09
Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 3- Transportation: Add text for new bike
classification; add new bike lanes that are complete or will be by the end of the construction season
- Montgomery from Woodruff to University
- Wellesley from Evergreen to Progress
- Nlansfield from Montgornery to SR 27
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 3- Transportation will have citywide implications.
PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 3- Transportation as proposed by staff.
File No. CPA-07-09
Application/Description of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 4- Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) and
Public Services: Update the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP); update Water Districts &
Wellheads map; update Parks & Recreation map; update 6-year Sewer map; add annexation area level of
senrice language:
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 4- CFP 8� Public Se;vices v�fill have citywide
implications.
PC Recommendation: Adopt text amendments to Chapter 4- CFP & Public Services as proposed by
staff.
3af4
File No. CPA-08-09
ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Text amendment to Chapter 8— Naturai Environment: update
Wetlands map; update Fish & Wildlife Habitat map.
Appllcant; City of Spokane Valley� 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 8— Nafural Environment will have citywide
implications.
PC Recommendation: Adopt amendments to Chapter 8— Natural Environment as proposed by staff.
ADOPTION OF FINDINGS: The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact (Sections
17.80.140 8� 17.80.150) when recommending changes to the comprehensive plan. Each staff report contains
findings applicable to the pa�ticular request. At the conclusion of the hearing for the comprehensive
amendments, the Planning Commission, by separate motion, adopted the findings of fact contained in the staff
repo�ts for CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09.
Approved this 26"' day of Marct�, 2009
�---
lan Robertson, Chair
C+ty of Spokane Valley Planning Commissian
4of4
ac men
Exhibit l: Comprehensive P1an Map
�`l'�:1�1' ,��'
�� '
- �_ � T
� �
` C�'oniniunit�
t ,
� r'c�n r}ierci:�l
, �
st i I �
% . j
- c
j
1
I'uh!ic' (�U:iS{-Pillllll' _ PUV�1l'.�QU351-I _- - - .
_ •�., - - •„ ... . ..
� I �+Neigtibo'rh_ood� . � : �-
�'C�inin��i;i l fi �,--;!.��',�!
n .
d c�
n �
.
� � ..
'- 3 - •
'�' U - �
� Z �I � i� ti -- ";
p ,e
•r. � - - - -
I � }ii�„f=. 0)rt��ii�� !{.�icl<•��ti;;i (
3rd 7 r� , . i _
;1lediwfi ='
Densi' �� CPA -01-09 �- �
, h� �
`� :���-:
Resideotial � -'
U fii <<� :,
th th �i`i '� �ti` �tii
� �ciahliu►�}��,c��i —�� � - — — — ',
! , � � \,
� (-'omrnei•c•�:�1 � th �,a
3 .
� _ L
Z "
.r�
Sth St6 �
G �
u ''
Z : f � 6tt�
6th
Pablic/Quasi- p ��
Public ? o �� ��'ater
, a I�ad ��
�
Fh
Central Public/QuasrPublic
Vallev
Senior High
1 ���
�
Lo Deasity ResideAti�l
Request: C6ange the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR
CPA-01-49 to HDR on parcels 45242.9050, 2.9051, 2.9036, 2.9U57, 2.9056,
Cit�� of Spokane VaUey 2.9033 and 2.9035 wit6 a subseqnent zoning of MF-2 and parcel
Community Development Department 45242.9032 be changed from LDR to MDR designation with a
subsequent zoning of MF-1.
E�ibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
"� l,ow I�en:ir� � 1 �� .� ium ens�ty
� � . i ' � Rc�i�jerti:il
f �` ke�icj�t�ti:ll ---
� �� Y j -
�.
i; , ''
E'i. � >
� l � -'
� fi(?1lI11111I�"� � ^
' � i '
� � L Ullllllt'1"Cl:7! � �
''.. .. ._ .�— -� _ � *
St?i" L't'_' �I�i.?�_L� `Fli.3"U.
. . ..� .�.�e=
H � ---- �`r'• . . _ -
.� �
. 1U' �
�. . �
�� . . � �
1
---,-� - �
- 1
__�_ � � �
� -- -� � ; �
,
. f
Corridor .
7ixed_L1se - - ---- f'Eii�;ic,'( iu::�i-I'��h1ir V � —
i PublidQuasi-Yubiic .
v; �� . _
� .. ,
=� � nd G . ; : : . . � : .
a. n � - ,r�
v � cpA-oz-o9 :���,�h �,►�t�����
c _nc� ,
l�icdium E t u;•�i��er� i.:l
� " � -j
�, Densit;r' f , —; - i - �— -- ----
� � � � I
Resiilcatial F �} Z �, i;i�.�i; i7��;,�i:; ;:t:;;lt-,;t;.;� I 1 �
� �
O 'J =
v� - — - — �
�
(�fiice � I � I I ' i �
t� th 4th �h - ___ _ . - - . �. _ _ i
r--- s — — �
� ('1�[i �i0t'i1c��)lj , �
C
�!OflllllCt'fl:�� L �
�
— � v,
tt1 �LfI - G �
C,
� c T
� CO `.
V
Low Density Resjdential z � f' �
th btb
�
r `
PubtidQuasi- �
Public °
�
� ;�
U �S " L .�
O �`
� -"`"
� ,�
v
v' Public/Quasi-Public
th
Central
Valley
� SeniorHig6
� �
� .�
� �
CPA-02-09 Request: Change t6e Compre6ens�ve Plan map desigaation
City of Spokane Valley from HDR to NC; c6ange zoning from MF-2 to NC.
Commonity Development Department
� � • ' ' " � . . �
--- - --- - - - ---- _
r _ � __ _ __ _______ �_
■� ,
- r �
..,..:
�� . . , �
� �
„1"
�'11,,,I
. '
'. , , ,//
/�///� � / �
_/// — �
�� ./
� : /�; 1
'- �- r � �
, :�_� :� � �
� ::�i� %
■ ,�.i,: � �
:•. �.. .
,������� ���
� ■ � �'111111�
� a �� � 1
� � �`� �
� �� �, �
� � � . � � � �s /11
■ ��
r� �:� � ��
1 � ��■ ■ . �� , ��
___�___ ��■ �
� �. . -,;. . -___.. ___ _ ��
' j���,�./i. .% : :,
1���1 !,:; % �iii :;�; ■■ � �
� / ;; ��// ;; j � � �� �
1� :,.. � �:: ���� 's:�: � �� ��
� �. ;; ,�% , . .;/. � ��
���� ■ �� �;; ���! ;;/; � � � .,
� ' � ,. ��i� ,,/. � S
� ,, .. . , ,;, �, 7
////•. �/�,' .;��• �
,;- . . 1
..
�� 1
��:: �i� - .�:1� � � ���-� � : . ,
�� __.____��
� � � . , . � iiiii_____ ;�� ■ . -� - -1
%; :; : �� r
1�� , . ..�: �
i / • ••�, �� � " �
/ + :-%: •� ■�
, �_ � /; ;;, ; �i
/,, .. �. �.
�,.. _ .,. ��
� �.,� i .,� . - ��
� � � % �s�% %;;�: � �� �
�� � � �%._,,: �. ��
� /;:;�i: � � �1
�'/,/�•.!� 1111 11��
111 � . .. � �„r-� �
■ �■ ■ %%�% '�% 11�� '
., ..� ■ , ,
:;/:;�
. , ,;;/;;.
, . /..� . ,
■ �,.•/...
■ � � .•/. �,
• , .•/.:•�
� .•/. • �
�../.-•� �
, -■ ■ _ �,•/,-.
- � i �•%i/
�% / / ,•/ �/ _
� � �%%/.;. �;,/ �
� ��%/ '' ! �
� � � j� ;:� : %
� � � •�/ �
■ � �'�'. . ,�
. ,,,,;.,, , � - �
� 'sii
� �. /♦ .
�r��� _
:�;;� ■ � I
%:j , � • ,. .��
■ ;/ ;./ �
/ :/ •• � �
� - /�::�' � ;�
.%�.� .,i
� ��i��� _ ���ii�:-% �::% ���L.� �� b'
�. � ��
'•�i• i���• i• ���� •i•i '.i ���� �:,,�i� �i
� �� :i. -
��i � � i:i� �� i� ��� � �
� i � i i � 1• � �� i• i 1•�• �• i "
E�ibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
:�: =
PublidQuasi-Public ' „��.'�,-�,�,
;►leclium Densit�• Residential ` �<< ._?�
,, .
()fTice �'�".�; .
'��:__=���'-
�� -� - ;:1::_
#,.{�.�
,. � 1�'�..i.t
E �...�. �`� �
� �YYl' 1 j:- /+ T��� ` . � _l :",
'i�. ri,P"[-71Y�•� :J.�.
:S;'Z 1'�.. ',_. " . '
Low Density R�sid ntial .
- - - ; : -�,
�
�
Q CPA-04-09
�
f -- -- -__--____- - ----- ---. __. _
; .;�.
I �-
I
i . � . � . M 1 . _ . _ _ � ' . . . � � • _
�
1
- �_'y� . .__ " �-' _ . Y '
I ,
1 1
1
-- C t�r�:t�i�:i�it� f ��i;li,�r����i:ii ��.
.
�or.rid'or��liied L�se .
` .._ _— --- - ------- ---
s
{
i
, -
tiCr,:
--------- -- — � -- ------- --- ._----------- � --- _
�� - -
CPA-04-09 Reqaest: Change the Comprehensive Ptaa map designation
City of Spokane Valley from CC to LDR; c6ange zontng from C to R4.
Community Development Department
ac men
a er — an se
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
I CHAPTER 2— LAND USE
2.0 Introduction
The Land Use chapter serves as the foundation of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive P/an
(SVCP) by providing a framework for Spokane Vailey's future physical development and by setting
forth policy direction for Spokane Vailey's current and future land uses.
Development of land, according to adopted policies and land use designations discussed in this
chapter, should result in an appropriate balance of services, employment, and housing. The land
use policies are supplemented by a Comprehensive Plan Map (Map 2.1) that provides a visual
illustration of the proposed physical distribution and location of various land uses. This map
allocates a supply of land for such uses as retail, office, manufacturinq� public facilities, services,
er�rp;c�:�er}� parks, open space, and housing to meet future demand.
2.1 Plannln� Context
State and county land use policies provide a statutory framework for the development of City land
use policies. tt is important to briefly review state and county level policies to better understand
historical conditions that have shaped the goals and policies in this chapter.
2.1.1 Growth Management Act
The Growth Management Act (GMA) acknowledges that, "...a lack of common goals expressing the
public's interest in conservation and the wise use of our lands pose a threat to the environment,
sustainable economic development, and the heatth, safety and high quality of life enjoyed by
residents of this state'.' The GMA provides a framework for content and adoption of local
comprehensive plans. The GMA provides 14 goals to be, `... used exclusively for the purpose of
guiding development of comprehensive plans and development regulations.' GMA goals pertaining
to land use include:
• Urban Growth — Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities
and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
• Reduce Sprawl — Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling,
Iow density development.
• Housing — Encourage the avaitability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the
population of the state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and
encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
• Open Space and Recreafion — Encourage the retention of open space and development of
recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural
resource lands and water, and develop parks.
• Envirr�nment — Protect the environrnent and enhance the state's high quality of life,
including air and water quality and the availability of water.
• Public Facilities and Services — Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the
development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels
below locally established minimum standards.
• Historic Preservation — Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and
structures that have historical or archaeological significance_
� RCW 36.70A.010
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 1 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
• Property Rights — Private property shall not be taken for public use without just
compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected
from arbitrary and discriminatory actions pursuant to state and federal law.
The GMA requires that Comprehensive Plan land use elements include the following:
• Designate the proposed general distribution, location and extent of the uses of land for
housing, commerce, industry, recreation, open spaces, public utilities, public facilities,
and other appropriate land uses;
• Population densities, building intensities, and estimates of future population growth;
• Provide for protection of the quality and quantity of ground water use for public water
supplies;
• Review drainage, flooding, and stormwater runoff in the area and nearby jurisdictions
and provide guidance for corrective actions to mitigate or cleanse those discharges that
pollute water of the state.
2.1.2 County Wlde Planning Policles
The County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA provide a regional framework to
achieve the goals of the GMA. The CWPPs are a refinement of policy direction contained in the
GMA and are a result of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and towns
within the County.
The CWPPs provide a policy framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence to
these policies ensures that plans within the county are consistent with one another. These policies
address such issues as the designation of urban growth areas, land use, affordable housing,
provision of urban services for future development, transportation, and contiguous and orderly
development. The following are specific CWPPs that relate to the Land Use Element
Policy Topic 1- Urban G�owth Areas
Policies
1. Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) are areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and
outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature. Urban Growth Areas
(UGAs) shall include areas and densities sufficient to permit the urben growth that is
projected to occur in the county for the succeeding 20-year period
'Urban growth" refers to growth that makes intensive use of land for the loc:ation of
buildings, structures and impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible with
the primary use of such land for the production of food, other agricultura) products or fiber,
or the extraction of mineral resources
Urban growth should be located first in areas elready characteriied by urban growth that
have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second
in areas slready characteriied by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both
existing public facilities and services, and any additional needed public facilities and
services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that
urban govemment services be provided by cities, and urban govemment services should
not be provided in rural areas Rural govemment services may be provided in rural areas.
However, Urban Growth Areas may be established independent of incorporated areas.
Within these independent Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), urban govemmental services may
Z RCW 36.70A.210
' Note to reader. The following pofldes ere numbered acxording to the policy number in the CWPPs, resulting in non-sequential
numbe�ing in this document.
' RCW 36.70A110
s RCW 36.70A.03Q(17)
° RCW 36 70A.110(3)
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapt�r 2— Land Use
Page 2 of 36
C�ry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
be provided by other than cities. Some cities may rely on contracts from Spokane County
for provision of urban services.
Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural
areas.
9. Wrthin Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), lands that falt within planned high-capacity
transportation corridors should be designated for sufficient intensity of land use to support
the economic provision of multimodal transportation.
11. Where applicable, comprehensive plans should contain land use policies which provide
protection for the continued viability of Fairchild Air Force Base, Spokane Intemational
Airport, Felts Field, Deer Park Airport and other publicly owned airports within Spokane
County.
12. Jurisdictions should work together to protect critical areas and open space within Urban
Growth Areas (UGAs).
Policy Topic 2- Jolnt Planning within UGAs
Policies
1. The joint planning process should:
a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose
Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of govemmental services;
b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities;
c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging
communities;
d. Ensure the ability to expand urban governmental services and avoid land use barriers
to e�ansion; and
e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in
designated joint planning areas will be coordinated.
2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into
between and/or among jurisdictions andlor special purpose districts.
Policy Topic 3 Promotion of Contlguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban
Services
Policies
5. All jurisdictions shall coordinate plans that classify, designate and protect natural resource
lands and critical areas.
7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to
address adequate fire protection:
a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection disirict or within the corporate limits of
a city providing its own fire department.
b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned
unit developments shall include the provision for road access adequate for residents,
fire department or district ingresslegress, and water supply for fire protection.
c. Development in forested ereas must provide defensible space between structure and
adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used.
10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for equitable distribution
of essential public facilities.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 3 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within UGAs which uses land efficiently, adds
certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban
govemmental services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction
shall ide�tify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year increments) within its UGA or
establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facility plans.
Policy Topic 4— Parks and Open Space
Policies
2. Atl jurisdictions should cooperate to identify and protect regional open space lands, natural
areas and corridors of environmental, recreational and aesthetic significance to form a
functionally and physically connected system which balances passive and active
recreational uses. Each jurisdiction shall identify open space corridors within and between
urban growth areas.
All jurisdictions shall identify implementation, management, preservation and conservation
strategies through both regulatory and non-regulatory techniques, to protect ident�ed lands
and comdors to sustain their open space benefits and functions. Implementation and
management strategies should include collaboration and coordination with land trusts and
other land preservation organizations.
3. Each jurisdiction shall require the development of parks and open space as a means to
balance the impacts associated with higher-density development.
5. Each jurisdiction shall make appropriate provisions for parks and recreation areas.
Policy Toplc 6 - Transportat�on
Policies
5. Local jurisdictions shall develop and adopt land use plans that have been coordinated
through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) to ensure that they preserve
and enhance the regional transportation system. These plans may include high-capacity
transportation corridors and shall fulfill air quality conformity and financial requirements of
Federal Transportation Laws and Regulations, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and
the GMA.
6. Local jurisdictions shall designate within land use plans areas that can support public
transportation services. These areas shall include existing as well as new development.
Each jurisdiction's land use plan, the regional transportation plan and the Spokane Transit
Authority's (STA) Long Range Transit Plan shall support, complement and be consistent
with each other.
11. Each jurisdiction shall address land use designations and site design requirements that are
supportive of and compatible with public transportation, for example:
a. pedestrian-scale neighbofioods and activity centers;
b. mixed-use development; and
c. pedestrian friendly and non-motorized design.
Policy Toplc 7— Affordable Housing
Policies
2. Each jurisdiction's development policies, regulations and standards should provide for the
opportunityr to create effordable housing in its community. Such policies may include
regulatory tools, such as inclusionary zoning, performan�mpact zoning, mixed-use
development and incentives for increasing density to promote greater choice and affordable
housing in its community.
Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 4 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehenstve Plan
6. In conjunction with other policy topics, coordinate housing, transportation and economic
development strategies to ensure that su�cient land and densities for affordable housing
are provided in locations readily accessible to employment centers.
2.2 �and Use Plan
Spokane Valley's land use pattem (the physical location of uses) exists as a result of development
administered by Spokane County untif incorporation of Spokane Valley on March 31, 2003 and to a
far lesser extent the subsequent development under Spokane Valley's jurisdiction. As shown in
Figure 2.1 below, the majority of land is designated residential (57%) under this Plan. Of the land
designated residential, 50% is designated as Low Density Residential with densities up to six
dwelling units per acre. Nearly 20% of the land area is designated as Heavy and Light Industrial.
The remaining land is designated as commercial, office, or public/quasi public.
Comprehensive Plan Designations - Land
PubidQuasi-Pubtic Area
Park/Open Spaae 736 Ciry Cenler Comnun�y Corm�erd�
39�6 � Regbnal Commercial � 1% 296
Neighbahood � 3 � 0 / ���or Mbced Use
2°.6 �. \� �� �. l� 3 �
Cor►rrrerciel � �
096 �� _ � zl Heavy Industrial
� 1496
Mixed Use �
3 ��' i � — --- � - � HDR
MDR ��� 3°k
496
� Light Industlel
LDR 596
50°�6
Figure 2.1: Land Use by Comprehensive Plan Category
2.2.1 City Center Plan
This scenario presents concepts and strategies for creating a definable and vibrant "City Center" for
the City of Spokane Valley. The purposes of creating a Spokane Valley City Center are:
1. Create an identifiable city center that is a social and economic focus of the City;
2. Strengthen the City overall by providing for long-term growth in employment and housing;
3. Promote housing opportunities close to employment and services;
4. Develop land use patterns that suppo�t the development of a more e�ensive regional
transportation system, whatever the ultimate configuration may be;
5. Reduce dependency on automobiles;
6. Consume less land with urban development;
7. Maximize the public Investment in infrastructure and services;
8. Provide a central gathering place for the community; and
9. Improve the quality of design for development throughout the City.
There are several reasons why a definable, vital City Center is important to Spokane Valley's
future. These include:
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 5 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
1. The development of a more intensive, mufti-use c�ty center is a natural step in Spokane
Valley's evolution. Most new urban areas start out as bedroom communities. Retail and
commercial uses then develop to serve the new residential population. Offrce and
industrial activities next begin to locate et key transportation crossroads, adding jobs and
strengthening the employment base. Spokane Valley has experienced these evolutionary
phases and is now ready for a defined City Center.
2. Economic Development — Spokane Valley has an opportunity to transform itself from an
essentially residential community with retail and service based economy to a sub-regional
economic center with an expanded, more diverse employment base.
3. Community Support — A survey of Spokane Valley area citizens prior to incorporation
overwhelmingly indicated that the lack of identifiable "downtown" and a community
gathering place was of concem to a majority of respondents. Community support was
tested again wfien the city conducted a statistically valid survey in the spring of 2004. The
support to create a City Center was reiterated throughout the community meetings held
during the development of the comprehensive plan and the city's informal community
survey. A discussion of the results of the city's survey is included in Section 2.10.
The following could be components of the City Center:
1. Location: Generally located along the Sprague/Appleway corridor.
2. Size: Between 300 and 400 acres in size.
3. Streets: New streets could be added at every 200 to 400 feet to create an internal grid
street system to provide an urban atmosphere.
4. On-street parking would be provided on intemal grid streets.
5. Ground floor retail on both sides of streets.
6. Building out to the edge of the right-of-way and include wide sidewalks to encouraae a
lively street scene.
7. Office/Employment uses provided in high visibility locations with adequate parking and
adjacent to pleasant surroundings such as open space, retail shops and services.
8. Multi famify housing that is safe, secure, and located so that it is buffered from traffic noise
and provides a pedestrian friendly streetscape with connections to parks, schools,
shopping, services and transit.
9. Civic/public uses such as city hall, community library, performing arts center, city center
park green space or other public uses that would attract people to downtown over an
extended portion of the day.
Other characteristics of this land use scenario include the following:
1. Neighborhoodlcommunity retail centers - current land use pattems dictate that residents
travel to the Sprague Avenue corridor to access some of the most basic goods and
services. This scenario would provide for smaller scale, less intensive retaiUcommercial
centers in the south end and northeast portions of the city. Potential locations for these
centers would be focused at intersections of erterials at the periphery of the city, such as
Highway 27132 Avenue, Dishman Mica RoadBowdish Road and Barker RoadlBoone
Avenue.
2. Office zoning districts — currently, there is no specific zoning district or comprehensive plan
designation for professional office uses. The county has used the UR-22, Multi-family
zoning district as its office district, which has resuhed in a number of issues related to
rezones and appropriate development standards. Areas that are currently developed in
predominantly office uses would be re-designated to an °Office' comprehensive plan
designation and zoning districts developed to implement this plan designation would
include development standards to implement the policies of the comprehensive plan.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 6 of 36
Ciry of Spokane Valley ComprehensivE Plan
Spec'rfic areas in the city include the Evergreen corridor north of Sprague Avenue; Mission
east of Pines Road in the Valley Hospital/medical office area; near the intersection of Pines
Road and Broadway; and other areas identified through the land use inventory process.
3. "Auto-Rov�' Overlay — The c'rty has several new auto dealerships located along Sprague
Avenue. The majority of these dealerships are located befinreen Argonne Road and
Thierman Road. Two dealerships are located just west of Dartmouth Road, near the U-City
Mall. New car dealerships provide the city with substantial sales tax revenue on one hand,
on the other hand auto dealerships can have a sign�cant visual impact on a community
and have somewhat unique needs related to development standards, such as signage and
street frontege landscaping. This scenario recognizes these circumstances and designates
the areas identified above appropriately, and provides policy direction for the implementing
development regulations.
4. Mixed-use — this scenario suggests reducing the strip commercial on Sprague Avenue by
maintaining Community Commercial zoning only at major intersections such as Pines,
Evergreen and Sullivan Roads. Areas in between these commercial "nodes' would be
designated as Corridor Mixed-use or some other appropriate designation, which would
encourage conversion of these vacant and/or dilapidated commercial areas into areas of
office/employment, residential and specialty retail.
5. Industrial areas would not be significantly changed or altered under this or any other
scenario. Permitted uses and development standards wou(d be reviewed for
appropriateness and changes proposed based on policy direction of the comprehensive
plan.
6. The majority of land in the City of Spokane Valley is dedicated to single family residential
zoning and land use. The majority of the single family residential areas are designated Low
Density Residential under the interim comprehensive plan. This plan designation allows for
residential densities from one to six dwelling units per acre. Under this scenario, the
existing single family residential zoning districts would be evaluated, and a series of single
family districts with minimum lot sizes ranging from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet would be
considered. Reducing overall lot sizes would enable the city to maintain its existing single
family character, and minimize land needed for mutti-family zoning to accommodate the
c'rty's 20 year population growth projection.
7. Areas previously platted in 1+/- acre lots — There are areas in the City that were platted as
approximately one acre lots. These areas would be rezoned to an R-1 zoning designation
with the intent to preserve the original intent of the zoning fo� these areas. Moreover, these
areas would be allowed to maintain a small number of livestock such as horses, cows, or
Ilamas in keeping with the rural character of these neighbofioods.
2.3 Relationshi� to Other Comarehenslve Plan Chapters
The land use concept set forth in this chapter is consistent with all SVCP chapters. Internal
consistency among the chapters of the SVCP translates into coordinated growth and an efficient
use of limited resources. Below is a brief discussion of how the Land Use chapter relates to the
other chapters of the SVCP.
2.3.1 Economic Development
Spokane Valley's economy is disproportionately divided. Dr. Grant Forsyth, Assistant Professor of
Economics at Eastern Washington University prepared a report based on year 2000 Census
information for the Spokane Valley area. This report, "A Demographic and Economic Analysis for
the City of Spokane Valley" indicates that there were nearly 3,000 employer firms employing
approximately 43,305 people in the year 2000 with an average annual payroll per employee of
approximateiy $29,000 (in 2000 dollars).
Dependence on retail trade and service occupations stems primarily from the City's evolution into a
regional shopping destination for eastem and southem Spokane County and counties in northem
Adopted April 25, 2046 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 7 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive P(an
Idaho. Increased regional competition from other retail areas, such as Post Falls and Coeur
d'Alene and the City of Spokane, may impact the City's ability to capture future retail dollars. To
improve Spokane VaNey's economic outlook, the economic development strategy is to promote a
more diverse economy. A diversified economy would achieve a better balance between jobs and
housing and support the Cit�s desired qualit�r of life.
In conjunction with the Economic Development chapter, this Land Use chapter promotes the
following:
1. A City Center composed of mid-rise office buildings, mixed-use retail, and housing.
2. Redevelopment and development of the Sprague Avenue/Appleway Boulevard corridor into
an area of quality commercial and Mixed-use development.
3. Establishment of design standards.
4. Presenration of existing single family neighborhoods.
The land use map designations support development necessary to achieve the above (see the
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map 2.1). A complete discussion of economic development is set
forth in the Economic Development chapter.
2.3.2 Capkal Facilities
Capital facilities provided by the City include: transportation and streets, pa�tcs and open space, and
surface water management. The amount and availability of urban services and infrastructure
influences the location and pace of future growth. The City is responsible for the construction and
maintenance of parks and recreation facilities, streets and transportation improvements, and
surface water facilities. Providing for future growth while maintaining existing improvements
depends upon the community's willingness to pay for the construction and financing of new facilities
and the maintenance of existing facilities.
As outlined in the Capital Facilities Plan, new infrastructure and services may be finar�ced by impact
fees, grants, designated capital taxes (real estate excise tax, fuel tax, utility tax), money from the
Cit�s general fund or voter approved bonds.
To capitalize on the City's available resources for urban services and infrastructure, this Land Use
chapter recognizes that concentrating growth is far more cost effective than allowing continued
urban sprawl. Concentrating growth also supports the enhancement of future transit improvements.
Annex�tion of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs1 to the Citv of Spokane Vallev mav be a lo�ical
�ro4ressiQn to ensure centralized planning �nd �revention of urban sorawl. A maior qoal of the
GMA is to reduce urban sprawl by encouraqnq development in urban areas where adeauate public
facilities exist GMA further states that cities are the lo4ical arovider of urban �ovemment services.
Prior to annexation the City of Saokane Va11ev will consider the economic imp�c�s of providinq
municipal services at a level consistent with other areas within the Citv. The Citv will not �rovide a
Lower level of service in areas being considered for annexation that were in exist�nce in the
�roposed areas at the time immediately preceding the annexation process The City will consider
PAAS� topogr8p� latld utilization 8�d DODUI8i10� d8f1SItY Wh@11 deteR111�1f1�1 SBNiC@ I@V815.
Water Availability — Potable water is provided to residents of Spokane Valley by thirteen water and
imgation districts. All drinking water used by residents in Spokane Valley is drawn from the
Spokane ValteylRathdrum Prairie Aquifer.
Water Quality - Maintaining a clean source of water is vital to the health and livability of the City.
Preserving water quality ensures a clean source of drinking water and continued health of the Cit�r's
streams and lakes. Maintaining water quality is also important for maintaining the health of the
aquifer that relies on surface water for recharge.
Contamination of an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead to serious health concems
and/or expensive treatment requirements. To address this concem and impacts of new
development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Plan. The plan specifies actions to
ensure water, quality including the development of detentioNretention facilities to control rate and
Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 8 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
quality of water runoff. FurtheRnore, development of a wellhead protection program with the
various water providers should provide guidelines to avoid possible contamination.
Policies contained in the Natural Environment chapter provide direction for development near
wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a complete discussion of water resources and water
purveyors in the City of Spokane Valley, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter.
2.3.3 Parks and Open 3pace
One of the most important and valued elements of a high quality living and working environment is
a parks and open space system. Providing parks and open spaces contributes to a reduction in
environmental impacts such as noise and air pollution; increases the value of adjacent properties;
provides areas for passive and active recreation; and helps preserve the natural beauty of the City.
2.3.4 Natural Envlronment
Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent. Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountains and the
Spokane River provide a scenic backdrop as well as a source for active and passive recreation for
the citizens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's unique
natural resources through policies that support the preservation of these areas for future
generations. The Natural Environment chapter also includes a discussion of critical areas as
defined by GMA. For a complete discussion, please refer to the Natural Environment chapter.
2.3.6 Housing
Housing is a basic human need and a major factor in the quality of life for individuals and families.
An adequate supply of affordable, attractive, and functional housing is fundamental to achieving a
sense of community. The central issue related to land use is suppiying enough land to
accommodate projec�ed growth for a range of incomes and households. Presently, housing is
provided primarily in single-family subdivisions.
This plan sets forth strategies to increase housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter
advocates changes to current development codes to increase flexibility in platting land and
encourage housing as part of mixed-use developments in commercial areas. The latter provides an
opportunity to locate housing closer to employment and shopping, and to create affordable housing.
A complete discussion of housing can be found in the Housing chapter.
2.4 Potential Annexation Areas
2.4.1 Projected Growth —
In October 2003 the City of Spokane CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Valley received a 2000 population POPULATION ESTIMATES
cert�cation from the U.S. Census 150,000
Bureau that indicated 80,927 people
called Spokane Valley home on April �4o,oao
1, 2000. As of April 1, 2003 the � 3a,000
population had grown to 82,005 �20,000
(based on the Washington State
Office of Financial Managemeni >> o,000
(OFM) population estimates). Upon ��,oao
incorporation on March 31, 2003, the 90,000
City of Spokane Valley became the eo,000 . � . ,� �
state's ninth largest city and second � � �, � �, �, � � � � �, ? �,
largest in Spokane County. o 0 o� o� o� o o�� o�� o� o�� o�, o�� o�,�
Spokane Valley received an OFM -
population estimate for April 1, 2004 Populatio�: ActuaUEaGmate
of 83,950. This new population P�v�� E�u�,�e: �.sx c�w�n �e
estimate moved Spokane Valley from Paputation Esttmaln: t5�i CsraMh Rda
the state's ninth largest city to the
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 9 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
state's eighth largest city. The 2004 population estimate reflects an annual increase of
approximately 2.4 percent over the city's 2003 population estimate. The most recent OFM estimate
� for Spokane Valley is 88,2g'�-920 as of April 1, �'�-�2008. This figure represents an annual growth
rate of approximately 1.5 percent. The average annual growth rate is approximately 1.91 % over
I the 4 year period from 2003 to 2007.
Future population growth is forecasted at the state and county level by OFM. This future population
groHRh was distributed between jurisdictions and unincorporated Spokane County through a
methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials (SCEO).
The City of Spokane Valley was not allocated population growth originally because the City had not
been incorporated when this action took place. However, the County did allocate population to the
'Spokane Valley IUGA', wfiich includes the new cities of Spokane Valley and Liberty Lake.
This process resulted in a population growth allocation of 39,431 to the Spokane Valley IUGA. This
IUGA also includes areas within the UGA that are still in unincorporated Spokane County. The
graph above indicates Spokane Va11ey's 20 year population using a 1.5% and 2.5% annual growth
rate.
Using the 1.5% annual growth rate, which is consistent with past estimated growth rates in the
Spokane Valley area, the estimated 2025 population of Spokane Valley is 114,765 or an increase
of 30,815 persons. The 2.5% annual growth rate results in a 2025 population of 141,011, an
increase of 57,061.
Spokane Valley proposed a population allocation of 20,666 to the SCEO based on the regional land
capacity methodology. This request was proposed as an "interim" request based on the
land/population capacity within the existing corporate boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason
for this request was based on the significant issues related to waste water treatment capacity.
Once the waste water issues have been resolved, Spokane Valley will prepare a revision to the
population allocation and present this information to the SCEO. This issue is discussed in more
detail below. The Spokane County Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) approved this
population allocation in November 2004.
The City has continued to refine the population projections based on the preceding information. At
a City Council retreat held on February 11, 2006, the City Council directed staff to utilize a 1.89%
annual growth rate for purposes of population forecasting. This resufted in a 20 year population
forecast of 38,fi14 persons. This information was presented to the SCEO on February 15, 2006
when the City officialfy requested a 20 year population allocation of 38,614 for planning purposes.
In 2006 the BoCC approved via Resolution 06-0438 a population allocation of 33,125 for Spokane
Valley for planning purposes.
2.4.2 Land Capacity Analysis
The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capacity Element to be included in the
comprehensive plan. However, GMA does require that Land Use, Housing and Capital Facilities
Elements include population densities, building intensities and estimates of future population
growth. The GMA also requires a Lend Capacity Analysis, or the theoretical holding capacity of the
designated Urban Growth Areas, which by definition includes cities. By assigning the expected
population growth to the results of the Land Capacity Analysis, the area required to accommodate
the population growth is shaped.
Countywide population forecasts are identfied by the CWPPs, as one criterion for consideration in
developing a regional meihodology or countywide population allocation. The countywide growth
target is based on the OFM growth management population forecast for Spokane County.
The Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County was developed through the efforts of
the Land Quantity Technical Committee between March 1995 and October 1995. The Growth
Managernent Steering Committee of Elected Officials adopted that methodology on November 3,
1995.
The adopted methodology is pattemed after the Washington State Department of Community,
Trade and Economic Development's (CTED) land quantity inventory guidebook entitled lssues in
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 10 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Designating Urban Growth Areas Part 1- Providing Adequate Urban Area Land Supply. Use of that
document was specified by the adopted Countywide Planning Policies (Policy Topic 1(Urban
Growth Areas Policy #3). However, the step-by-step CTED process was modified somewhat by the
I Land Quantity Technical Committee to reflect unique circumstances in Spokane County.
The following steps of the regional methodology were followed by Spokane Valley in conducting the
land capacity anaiysis:
1. Identify lands that are potential candidates to accommodate future growth - vacant,
partially-used and under-utilized land (in other words, subtract all parcels committed to
other uses).
2. Subtract all parcels that the community defines as not developable because of physical
limitation.
3. Subtract lands that will be needed for other public purposes.
4. Subtract all parcels that the community determines are not suitable for development for
social and economic reasons.
5. Subtract that percentage of land that the community assumes will not be available for
development within the community plan's 20-year time frame.
6. Build in a safety factor.
7. Determine total capac�ry.
Spokane Valley prepared a land capacit�r anaiysis of the city and surrounding UGAs based on the
above regional methodology. ' ' an�+�g-A�#�,��
#��e��-�e:c� `-� � :-� r -�~�--t�a#ef��e�--�e�- . , .,
��-8-s��-����1�-� f£r-p�t�pe�es�i �e���sti�,era--�L��!a�ie�:rc�����r�-,���-p��rg
��a��: The results of the land capacit�r analysis are contained in the table below:
Table 2.1 Spokane Valley UGA Land Capacity Analysis u d ted �:}'-�-��-�412/05/Q8)
� Vacant and Net Oevelopable Potentiat New Population
Area ParUalty Used Acrss Dwelline Unlb Capactty
Land ,
SpokaneValley ;,� ; ' �,:
i - �= 7 G�3 � � _,,
(Incorporated Area) — � - - - - i _ . � - - �
Northeast � --- 4_� -- - �_ � 92 �Q
Northwood � I , 4�2 1.367 � 418
�t -�-- �- � - � �
3outheast - -- 4$Z � 238 - - -- - - $� — - 2,3 81 -
3outh - -- �4 � � - � - - - 1.089 - - - 2.722
Ponderosa - -- - _ � - - � - L _1 - _ - - 1$� - - __ 1$ -
Edgecllff/Dfshman � i 1� � 527 1319
TOTAL ---- - � f� ��° � ?_ �'�i1 j 12.575 I 2? �?;
Spokane Valley recommended to the Stesring Committee that both the City of Spokane Valley and
the City of Liberty Lake receive an interim population allocation that could be accommodated within
the existing city limits of each crty. The rationale for this recommendation was based on the
situation regarding sanitary sewer throughout the entire Spokane region.
It is estimated that the Spokane County treatment plant will run out of capacity in 2009, and the
Liberty Lake Water 8� Sewer District treatment capability is currently at or near capac'rty. Permits to
expand the Spokane County and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of
Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt. Given the potential
constraint for both jurisdictions to provide this vital urban service, the Steering Committee
forwarded a recommendation to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners to allocate
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 11 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
only the population that could be accommodated within existing city limits until such time as the
sanitary sewer issues are resolved.
2.4.3 Potential Annexatlon Areas
The purpose of this section is to identify the unincorporated areas within the existing Spokane
County UGA that are adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley, which would comprise pvtential
annexation ar�eas for the City. Map 2.2 indicates potential annexation areas (PAAs) for the City of
Spokane Valley.
Spokane County adopted its first comprehensive plan developed under GMA in 2001. A complete
examination of urban senrices was required at the time the County established the UGA, moreover,
Spokane County was obligated to compty with the State Environmental Policy Act. The County's
plan included the designation of a regional UGA, which included the still unincorporated area of
Spokane Valley. The County utilized the SEPA/GMA integration process to fulfill the environmental
review requirements of the plan including the designated UGA.
When Liberty Lake incorporated in 2001 and Spokane Valley incorporated in 2003 much of the
'Valley UGA° was included as part of the newly created cities, but not all. In 2003 and again in
2006, Liberty Lake completed annexations totaling 975.69 acres of the County designated UGA.
These annexations resulted in a nearly 34 percent increase (from 4.5 square miles to just over 6
square miles) in land area for Liberty Lake.
As Table 2.1 indicates there are a number of unincorporated UGAs adjacent to Spokane Valley.
Several of these UGAs are only contiguous to Spokane Valley (south, southeast, and northeast)
and would be logical areas for future annexation to the City of Spokane Valley. Spokane County
and the metro cities of Spokane Valley, Spokane, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have begun the
process of updating the regional UGA consistent with the county wide planning policies (CWPPs).
Through this process, the City of Spokane Valley will identify areas needed to accommodate
allocated population growth by re-evaluating land quantity analysis and urban service delivery.
2 d n D�veleement of Geals, Pglicies. and Actions for Annexation
The Growth Management Act (GMA) reauires counties to designate Urban Growth Area (UGAs)
within which urban �rpwth shall be encouraqed RCW 36.70A.110 (1�. UGAs are to lnclude
sufficient land to accommodate the twentv-vear population arowth projected for the countv. The
GMA imposes planninQ reauirements to influence the ability of a citv to annex UGAs. A cifit is
�e4uired bv GMA to adopt policies for land use housinq capital facilities, utilities, and
transoortation within #he citv's UGA In arder to rneet this reauirement the Citv of S�okane Vallev
has developed policies and goals to provide �olicv Quidance for annexation of territorv within UGAs.
Annexation will have financial impacts on the citv' it mav be oositive or neqative. The Citv mav
need to develop an annexation studY to assess the
financial im acts esaecially for larper annexations.
The Caaital Facilities chapter ldentifies current service
providers within the Potential Annexation Areas
(PAAsI as a startina point for the detailed_anah�sis �
that may be needed prior to annexation � . .
2.5 Land Use Desi�nattons , �-��' - � � -�'�=- `
R � ; � ,� �r _ l, .r.
The land use designations in the SVCP recogn�ze the - ,���.�` � ..� -•�--- ,__ _
._ .,�.� :
relationships between broad patterns of land uses. _- . __ �
The designations set forth locat+onal criteria for each = - - . _ � _ _ : - . � � • _ . ` � .�
specific class of uses consistent with the long-term � . � '` ��' �' _ _ ��` " � . � �'�
r ,:: � ,
objectives of the SVCP. These designations provide � �, � .: �� � �: ,•� � � � ` �-
the purpose and intent for specific zoning districts. _ � -� - .. �.. � ` : '� �"� � � �� *��`�
. :��
The location of the comprehensive plan land use - ', � �-• , �;`Y+ • �� 'r- •� .
designations are shown on the Comprehensive Plan • �"" `
Land Use Map (Map 2.1).
Adopted Aptil 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 12 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Ptan
2.5.1 Resldential
The demand for and development of singie-famity housing is expected to continue for the
foreseeable future. Single-family development will occur as in-fill development of vacant or under
developed fots scattered throughout existing neighborhoods, and as subdivisions on vacant tracts
of land. To address future housing needs, the Land Use chapter encourages new techniques for
developing single-family housing. Such techniques include clustering, planned unit developments,
Iot size averaging, zero lot line development, accessory dwelfing units and special needs housing.
Low Denslty Resldential
The Low Density Residential (LDR) Comprehensive Plan designation addresses a range of single
famiiy residential densities from one dwelling unit per acre up to and including six dwelling units per
acre. This designation would be implemented through a series of zoning designations as described
below.
Implementing zoning for the LDR
designation will include a series of zones
allowing a range of minimum lot si�es. ��
Existing lot si�es and community character =::
will be strongly considered when � '�=�'� ��
developing the City's zoning map. For —.�� '
example, areas such as Rotchford Acres ' , J
and Ponderosa will likely require minimum �;�"
lot sizes close to an acre in size. These -- ..-.__ ���.� s.�- -'
large lot developments currently allow for . -
horses and other large animals and have a
distinct character that should be preserved
to the greatest extent possible. The 1� -- .. .
majority of the LDR designation will `�•
provide for densities ranging from four to
six dwelling units per acre. Typical lot
sizes will range from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. Some areas designated as LDR still lack
necessary urban senrices and infrastructure, mainly sanitary sewer facil�ties. Upon provision of
urban services, such as water and sewer, and transit services, an increase in density in some areas
may be warranted. However, the City will adopt strict criteria to evaluate zone changes to ensure
that future development is compatible with the surrounding neighbofiood.
Medium Density Residential
The Medium Density Residential designation represents an opportunity to provide a range of
housing types to accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population, decline
in average family size, and increased cost of single-family homes have created increased demand
for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such
as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums in existing multi-family areas and within mixed-use
development in commercial areas.
Multi-family uses, in large part, are in areas currently zoned for multiple-family development.
Zoning will allow densities up to 12 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Density Residential
designation. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment and build-out of
remaining parcels.
Multi-family residential zones should be used as transitional zoning between higher intensity land
uses such as commercial and office, to lower density single family neighborhoods. Additionally,
Medium Density Residential areas should be located near services and high capacity transit
facilities or transit routes.
Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple-family developments
should be considered. The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop multiple-family
housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 13 of 36
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
High Density Residentiai
This designation provides for existing multi-family residential development developed at a density in
excess of 12 units per acre. Additionally, High Densit�r Residential (HDR) designated areas are
elso located in areas near higher intensity development, such as a City Center. HDR provides
housing opportunities for younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to
afford a home of their own. Moreover, this designation provides housing options for people looking
to "downsize" from a single family dwelling on an individual lot, or for those known as °empty-
nesters" whose childnen have moved out of the household and a large single family home is no
longer needed. Generally, this designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to the
arterial street system served by public transit, and is in close proximity to business and commercial
centers.
2.6.2 Commerclal Designatlons
Existing commercial areas are auto-oriented and characterized by one-story low intensity
development. In the future, these areas will become more intensively developed and pedestrian
oriented, and in some designations, accommodate housing. Transforming existing areas into
places where people went to live, shop, and work requires changes. Commercial areas should
contain street fumiture, trees, pedestrian shehers, well marked crosswalks, and buildings oriented
to and along the street to provide interest and allow easy pedestrian access.
Regional Commercial ,� !
�
The Regional Commercial � �
designation encompasses two major /'' ~` �
' �.��.
retail areas of the Crty. It cove�s the �- .�;
"strip' retail areas along Sprague �'. *. . � � _ - ► � -
Avenue which includes the - - �� � {. ,�, , = ��; ;i �'
automobile deaferships located along � �� .' . .'� �
.
the westem end of the SpraguE - :.-.- �.�� _ ` -- - ��� � -
Avenue comdor and the °big box� � ;�r� --� '� • ''°�►i�= �� .; �� ;;
retail area found in the Sullivan Road �: �.�..-, �� �-•-� ��
area from Sprague Avenue north to . j-- t�- �`
the Interstate 90 interchange, and ' ;
includes the Valley Mall and Wal-
Mart. Regional Commercial allows a 1 •_ � ,�:
large range of uses. A wide range of �
-
development types, appearance,
ages, function, and scale can be found along Sprague Avenue. �1der, single-story developments
provide excellent opportunities for redevelopment.
To create retail areas that are aesthetically and functionally attractive, revised development
standards should be applied through Regional Commercial zoning, along with the adoption of
Community Design Guidelines which address
design quality, mixed-use, and the integration of
auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Site
design, modulation, and setback requirements are
also addressed. . : ���`�-� '' ��'- - .
��� ,�
` ,_ ' { ! � --� � .�' i_ . ., ' �
Community Commercial ' � .
� �. - .� =� _�;
The communiry commercial class�cation _ . _ ; __ _ _ _ ,
designates areas for retail, service and office � � -
establishments intended to serve several
neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas
should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and � -
should be located as business clusters rather _.
than arterial strip commercial development. ���=�- ��
Community Commercial centers may be _
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 14 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
designated through the adoption of the comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or
through sub-area planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or multifamily
developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. In addition,
light assembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in commercial zones may be
allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses or
zoning districts.
Neighbofiood Commerclal
The neighborhood commercial classification designates areas for small-scale neighborhoods
serving retail and office uses. Neighborhood business areas should not be larger than finro acres in
size, and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial
developments. Neighborhood business centers may be designated through the adoption of the
comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan amendments or through neighborhood plans.
Auto-Row Overtay
The City of Spokane Valley is home to several major new automobile dealerships. While these
land uses provide a positive economic impact on the community, they can also have less positive
impacts on the aesthetics of the community. Auto dealerships typically have vast areas of
pavement to store new and used vehicles for sale. These land uses also have unique
requirements for landscaping and signage. Unlike many commercial uses whose stock in trade is
contained within a building, it is necessary for auto dealerships to have their vehicles cleariy visible
from the street. This makes traditional street side landscaping (consisting of low growing shrubs
and bushes, and trees) not viable for these uses.
An overlay designation is being suggested rather than a zoning district because the negative affects
on the non-auto dealer uses in the area will be minimized or eliminated.
2.fi.3 City Center
The intent of establishing a City Center in Spokane Valley is to create a higher density, mixed-use
designation where office, retail, government uses, and residential uses are concentrated. The City
Center witl also be located at one of the major hubs of the region's high capacity transit (HC�
system.
The City Center encourages higher intensity land uses. Traditional city centers are places where
diverse office, retail, and govemment uses are concentrated, as well as cultural and civic facilities,
community services and
housing. Nationally, many
cities are advocating mixed-use
development in city center core _- � �
areas for a number of reasons, _ .. .�� . - - `� `���
including: _
�=
• Providing new housing, � .
increasing the range of � ' �' � �
y ._ ::, s; .
housing choices, and _ - =�� �Y � _
reducing dependency _.. .: —
on the automobile by '' � �
bringing work places
and residences into
close proximity;
• Providing retail and - - � - -
t
service nesds in close - - " -.�. �
proximity to residential �- -� � *�'
, . �.
and employment
centers; �'�
• Improving feasibility of
Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2– Land Use
Page 15 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
a development project. The proximity of urban services makes housing projects more
desirable and a nearby source of consume�s help make a commercial project more viable.
Residents choose to live in higher density housing for a variety of reasons. First, higher density
housing is more affordable than traditional single family housing. Second, the convenienoe and
proximity to work, needed services and cultural activities is very desirabte for many people. Finally,
many people find that they do not need a
large, single family detached house. Given
their lifestyle, they appreciate the low -- `�`►��
maintenance and security of higher dens'rty
living. There is a mutually supportive -
relationship between higher density - � �� .
>
� �... � .,�.. � -
residential uses and commercial and retail _ _ _ __ _ ; .�_ � ,��. , . �--
activities. The presence of housing the core ___ _,,� r�
area also activates the streets in the city � -' -
center, day and night. '. - - � �,
�' �` '� .. ., .
Concentrating growth in a specific area also .'. �., �
supports investment in public infrastructure ` • � .?+=' �_ '- �� ����
including the regional HCT system. Existing �� y 1� 4 =� �
l o w d e n s i t y develo pment does not generate
sufficient levels of demand to optimize the `' �,; _ �
�r �J. r_ � �
return on investment in transit. Prornoting s , ��
� _ ,
higher density uses within walking distance of r
transit facilities will improve the viability of this
significant infrastructure investment. Moreover, concentrating the highest density of development in
the City Center, where a significant number of jobs and residences will be within walking distance of
a transit station, helps reduce the dependency on the automobile and improves pedestrian mobility.
The City Center emphasizes pedestrian, bicycle, and transit mobility but wil! not be unfriendly to the
use of automobiles.
� The City Center area will also be the central gathering
�� , � place for the community — a place where the whole
a Y�'` ., community can oongregate and celebrate. Acc�rdingly,
, _ - `-:
�' �= -=�.; -<�- f Y� the City Center should include an outdoor square, park, or
. .. ��
�� i�F commons with amenities such as fountains, sculptures,
!�,^ -'' and unique landscaping. Other civic amenities or
,� ��,�.�' buildings including city hall or a performing arts center
M -_ �� �' could be grouped around the core area square or park.
��'�'"�` Y� �'� ��� The City currentfy holds an annual Christmas Tree
�,rA �,�,�,3�1,�..�. � _ ' �� _
- ,�,� Lighting Ceremony in the area designated as the City
q , �, ,�, .�`' Center. Additional such events throughout the year will
t, -� �:.� -
,�,��, �_- •�'.� enhance the feeling of community in Spokane Valley.
_ '1" - F ' J .�_ " y'.
`- '�' An a ro riate street network is a critical com onent of
� �'� pP P p
���" ' the City Center. The current network of collector streets
and arterials, the disjointed grid, and large block sizes
contribute to a lack of identity in the City. The solution is not necessarily to construct wider streets.
Streets become less efficient as the number of lanes increases. Building new streets versus
widening existing streets can be more cost effective, yietds greater capacity, and will have a more
positive irnpact on the City Center.
Automobiles are likely to continue as a dominant mode of transportation for the foreseeable future.
A comprehensive network of streets must be developed to distribute this traffic and create more
driving choices. To the extent possible, the City should connect streets and construct new streets
to form a tighter grid system within the City Center, especially in the core area, by negotiating new
public rights-of-way and building new streets. This 'interconnectivity° serves to sho�ten and
disperse trips, and consequently reduce travel on existing congested arterials.
Adopted April 25, 20U6 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 16 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Pedestrian and bicycle mobility is a vital
part of the future City Center -- - L ''��-�_
transportation system. Improvements ' � � � .,
for pedestrians and bicyclists should � _�;, `.� _
support increases in transit services ('�, 'J , k � _.
and promote the development of the ' • �� \��
City Center. As the street system is �_ �- ',� �
developed to better accommodate the } ��
needs of pedestrians and bicyclists, a �-1 �. �
network of facilities for people on foot _ , .� ;
and bikes should be established. • �,,r_��_: - .-
<i.
- _ . -, -
Reducing the size of the street grid, -� �' ,� C_:� i.� -'
improving auto circulation and creating �`�- -"�
pedestrian linkages through larger `' ,�bN
parcels is critical to establish walking c� t.��`�r��..b
patterns that reduce dependency on the auto. As individual sites are designed and developed to be
more pedestrian friendly and improved pedestrian linkages are provided, the pedestrian system will
handle an increasing share of trips. Special street design standards should be developed for the
City Center. Special standards for extra-wide sidewalks (12 to 20 feet in width), pedestrian-scale
street lighting, and additional amenities including benches, trash receptacles, and landscaped
comer treatments should be included.
Transforming the existing commercial core area into the proposed City Center is an ambitious task.
It requires a significant transformation from a low-density, automobile oriented, largely retail area, to
a higher intensity, more pedestrian oriented Mixed-use area. The City Center section of the Plan
acknowledges that the City Center will take some time to develop. The City can �acilitate these
changes through a series of small steps taken over time. This is especially true if the steps are
consistent with emerging economic, social and demographic trends. As is the intent of this Plan,
the phasing scenario presented here accounts for the timing of market projections and future
actions.
As noted above, the implementation
� strategy is keyed to projected trends
� .� �,� ����� , r -: .": ,� and regional planning goals. Its form
� - � � ���`�'��' r ,:- , �'' .= ' � � �'' and character, as envisioned in th is
�;�.,�'��.�, �'�� �. �y,;�� '�{A �� ' � Plan, are dramatically different from
,j �� ;, �� ,
_�t ���� `��'�=' � r� � anything that now exists in the
.� ,
•, f ' �,'' ` " '•�. G proposed City Center area. It wifl
� � .� .` ;_, take some time for the development
� d�. ��� �`_ community to redirect its energy and
• investments to produce development
that responds to the direction of the
�, � M� �� � _ t Plan. The demand for more intense
• � development opportunities in the City
�' �, :�, ,, �.,�, � Center is not forecasted within the
next few years. In the meantime, the
""'� T'�"" City should discourage continued low-
scale investment in this area since
new development will take several
years to be amortized, and will delay the accomplishment of prefeITed development. As regulations
are applied to modest renovations, it should be possible to gain some basic improvements.
However, the City should not expect full implementation of the vision for the City Center until major
property owners in the area are ready to install long-term, major development projects.
The figures (computer generated as part of the TOD Study) at the beginning of this section first
show the existing conditions of the City Center, the second figure illustrating potential
redevelopment of the area over time. The pictures are taken from app roxim ate ly Farr Road loo king
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 17 of 36
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
east toward the U-City Mall area. The photos do not necessarify indicate specific recommendations
for the area, but are merely an illustration of how a viable City Center could evoive through several
coordinated, incremental steps taken over time.
2.6.4 Office Deslgnation
Spokane Valley has areas of quality
office development. Several I T
developments within the � _ � �=�
. �.
Argonne/Mullan Couplet, Pines Road. � � : -
and Evergreen Road corridors . �
;_ ' � �
embody good design and are - - " ��.� � ' -
representative of desired future office i: �a�;� �: �� � 1, �. -�
.�
development. Office development " '�'"'
will provide new job opportunities - � + � '�' ~ � � ,� � � =-e , ��ti � �►?: �
within the oommunity. . --� � �=`j�..'�w���%° ``��
_ �, ,
This comprehensive plan designation � � - -
is intended primarily for office �
development with limited retail or
commercial uses. Retail and commercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subord�nate to
the primary office use, or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the
retail or commercial use. Primary uses which are representative of this comprehensive plan
category, include medical end dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financiai
institutions, design firms, and legal services.
Areas designated as Office can serve a variety of functions. They can stand alone as major
employment centers. They can also act as buffers or transition areas between higher intensity land
uses and lower intensity land uses. For example, Office areas can provide a transition between
industrial or commercial uses and residential areas. Office uses work well for this because they
tend to generate less traffic and noise, operate shorter hours and are often smaller in scale then
industrial or commercial areas.
The Office comprehensive plan
designation will be implemented
through a series of office zoning
districts. '`k�' �''-�
� ► r'
2.6.6 Mixed-use `��- "�
_--
The concept of 'Mixed-use" has been ; _ , . �,� � `� � � � ' ae a �
around for centuries. Prior to the ,� �, -=� ,� Q` f� �� �F
advent of the automobile an d t he �' '}. z� ��� +� �`
proliferation of the road and highway _ .� '•" � ��� _ � ■ ;�" ; �
� � ���
system, Maed-use was a _�. _ j., �� .
predominant urban form. The -� ` ='�""— '�� - - -- - `
"rediscovery" of this development � � �' +
type may be due in part to the
negative impacts of sprawl, which _
have resulted in traffic congestion,
decline in air quality, and inefficient
use of resources and infrastructure. Mixed-�se d�veiopment has several potential benefits:
• Lend and infrastructure resources are used more efficiently;
• Pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods;
• Jobs are located near housing;
• Opportunities to revitalize commercial corridors;
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 18 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
• Opportunities for infill residential development (primarily in corridors);
• Encourage new housing and innovative retail that is (ess auto dependent; and
• Compatibility with existing transit access along local corridors.
Mixed-use may be either "horizontal Mixed-use' or °vertical Mixed-use." Horizontal Mixed-use
means that residential, commercial, office and other uses are adjacent to each other typically as
part of an overall master plan for a site. However, not all projects within a"Mixed-use° designated
area must be Mixed-use to achieve the goals of this plan. For example, a new residential-only
project that is appropriately designed and located adjacent to an older existing commercial building
may help stimulate renovation and reuse. This would be a more likety scenario in the Corridor
Mixed-use area rather than the Mixed-use area.
Vertical Mixed-use means that residential and nonresidential uses are stacked over each other.
Typically, residential uses are placed over ground level retail, offices and/or restaurant uses. This
development type would be more likely to occur in the City Center or in the areas designated as
Mixed-use.
Corridor Mixed-Use
Corridor Mixed-use is intended to enhance travel options, encourage development of locally serving
commercial uses, multi-family apartments, lodging and offices along major transportation corridors
identified on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map (Map 2.1). Corridor Mixed-use recognizes the
historical low-intensity, auto-dependent development pattem, and focuses on a pedestrian
orientation with an emphasis on aesthetics and design. The Corridor Mixed-use designation is
primarily used along Sprague Avenue in order to space the areas designated commercial.
Mixed-Use Center
The Mixed-use Center designation would allow for two or more different land uses within
developments under this designation. As described above, Mixed-use developments can be either
vertical or horizontally mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail and/or
lodging along with higher density residential uses, and in some cases community or cultural
facilities.
Mixed-use developments in this designation are characterized by diffiering land uses which are
developed pursuant to a coherent, approved plan of development. Compatibility between uses is
achieved through design which integrates certain __-.- _ _
physical and functional features such as _ �� '� s �� `� � r
, :�� .� ,�_��:
trensportation systems, pedestrian ways, open i '�,� �-: ��'�� x''
areas or cc�,�` y�sr�is �,�ci �c�. f:�c�' poi�,�� �~ - .
amenities 4 � ? .
.� � �!}� !'.�! !: �� .. ,,
2.5.6 Industrial Designations �;F
Providing for industrial land is important for th.� _�.it _ _ __ _ � =��� ' � - � '
economic health of Spokane Val{ey. Industrial
businesses help drive the local economy and create
an economic multiplier effect throughout the region
Providing an adequate supply of usable land with
minimal environmental constraints and infrastructure
in place helps ensure that Spokane Valley will be an
attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. �See Chapter 7, Economic
Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial
business.)
Heavy Industry
Heavy industry is characterized by intense industrial activities which include, but are not limited to,
manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly/disassembly, freight-handling and similar
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 19 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding
areas.
Commercial, residential and most recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for
heavy industry, except for small-scale ancillary uses serving the industrial area. The conversion of
designated industrial lands to other uses should be limited. Limiting incompatlble uses ensures a
competitive advantage in business recruitment by providing adequate industrial land supply,
reducing land use conflicts and preventing inflation of land prices. Moreover, allowing a wide
variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the Industrial areas would be in conflict with other
portions of this Plan related to concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection
of major streets.
Llght Industry
The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention
given to aesthetics, landscaping, and intemal and community compatibility. Uses may include high
technology and other Iow-impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and
commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. Non-industrial uses
should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses.
The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas
and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for
heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors.
2.b.T O
The �-�1' Parks and Oaen Space '� � '-
� � r
designation is intended to p�te�-l-�-��se�ac--��a: � -�'`�«'� ���'�'����
E �t��, F't�jl--E�Ei�4i@ "' `' C �, ` ' •` �:
� � � � � �.�' r
� �- � �� ��� .�.: + � 3
;. . =� .,�:
" � I , � 7 _1 �+ t ..
1 •, ♦ � �< i� �;}_ �f �}, .�
. R ' , , _ ''c' - �' - , `� _
` =.� � � *. ^� • �:' �
�1'���e�es�a�e,=�-prav�-�a��-protect�_ � - � _.
� �
parks, open space, and other natural physical assets , � �± ,-,�- �-:�.,'�� ���' _"f %
of the community. <- '�' -;� '' <<
t"VOQ'ttf�C�'o � . .. , 1 � .r.'
+ i�—�26i�F�+@F '
�,����f�:`�� �" , �#3�-�+��i8�-
. �
2.6 Development Revlew Process
The Land Use chapter provides the policy foundation � T
for implementing zoning end development
regulations. In developing policy concerning future land use regulations, or revisions to e�dsting
regulations, every effort has been made to instill certainty and efficiency in the development
process. State legislation has focused on developing streamlined and timely pennit processing.
Through the goals and policies of this Plan, the City will continue to strive to provide an efficient and
timely review system.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-20Q8) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 20 of 36
City of Spakane Valley Comprehensive Pian
2.7 Urban Desi�n and Fonn
In addition to guiding development, the Land Use chapter also guides the quality and character of
the City's future development pattern through goals and policies related to the form, function, and
appearance of the built environment. These priorities and implementation strategies, related to
quality development, serve and will continue to seroe as a basis from which to develop appropriate
implementation measures.
The design of our urban environment has a significant effect on community identity. Well designed
communities contribute to a healthful, safe and sustainable environment that offers a variety of
opportunities for housing and employment. An attractive and well planned community is invaluable
when recruiting new business and industry to an area. Some of the concepts considered include:
• Community appearance, including signs and placement of utilities;
• Neighbofiood considerations in the review of development projects;
• Integration and linking of neighborhoods including bicycle and pedestrian facilities;
• The effect of traffic pattems and parking on neighborhood character;
• Encouragement of high quality development through the appropriate use of planned unit
developments; and
• Consideration for public art.
2.7.1 Aesthetic Corridors
Aesthetic corridors are intended to protect the visual appeal of Spokane Valley along major
transportation routes entering and exiting the city. Aesthetic corridors provide special design
standards for aesthetics along major transportation routes to help create a quality image of
Spokane Valley.
Another component of aesthetic corridors is the 'gateways' into the city. There are several
entrances into the City of Spokane Valley along major transportation corridors, including Sprague
Avenue, Trent Avenue, State Route 27 and a number of interchanges on Interstate 90. Design
elements and landscaping treatments should denote a sense of arrival into the City, a
neighborhood or special area such as the city center.
2.7.2 Planned Unit Developments
Building flexibility into the subdivision process is important to allow for new concepts and creative
site design. Planned unit developments (PUDs) provide the city a tool for altowing flexibility, while
ensuring a design meets overall health and safety standards, and is consistent with neighbofiood
character. PUDs allow for deviations from the typical zoning standards in exchange for designs
that protect the environment, provide usable open space, and exhibit exceptional quality and
design.
2.8 Historical and Cuttural Resources
2.8.1 Background
In many ways, Spokane Valley's historic and cultural resources are similar to our rich natural
resources. Like wetlands, rivers, lakes, streams and other natural resources, historic properties are
a finite and endangered resource. Also like our natural resources, once an historic or
archaeological property is destroyed, it is lost forever. Cultural resources such as historic buildings,
monuments of historic events and archaeological sites are statements of Spokane Valley's identity.
People especially value our authentic, homegrown cultural resources that set us apart from other
areas of the state.
Spokane Valley is the Iocation of several °Flrsts' to occur in the Spokane Region. The first
permanent settler in the Spokane area was Antoine Plante, a retired French-Canadian trapper.
Plante built a cabin near the Spokane River in 1849, from which he operated a small Hudson's Bay
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 21 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Company trading post. Plante also constructed and operated the first ferry on the Spokane River.
Other settlers began arriving in this area between 1865 and 1882. "Firsts' to occur in Spokane
Valley include the first settler in 1849, first business and feny in 1850, the first store and bridge in
1862, the first house in 1866 and the first post office in 1667. All of these `firsts" occurred before
the arrival in 1873 of James Glover who was considered the 'Father of Spokane."
A large part of Spokane Valley's identity is derived ftom its heritage. From the Native Americans
who first established trading centers to the continuing waves of newcomers from around the worid,
all have left their mark. Cultural resources include historic structures and landscapes engineered
and built by man:
a. Historic buildings - houses, bams, commercial buildings, churches, schools.
b. Historic structures - bridges, dams, stone fenc;es.
c. Historic districts - a grouping of buildings with related historic charecter.
d. Historic objects - statues, monuments, sculpture.
e. Landscapes — gardens, parks, urban and rural.
Cuftural resources include properties that were held in spiritual or ceremonial honor or by a cuttural
group or tribe. Cultural resources include properties which may no longer show evidence of man-
made structures, but retain an historical association with an event or period. Archaeology sites
include such areas as battlefields, campsites, cemeteries, bu�ial sites, rock carvings, pictographs,
trails, village sites, fishing sites, trading sites, religious and ceremonial sites.
2.8.2 Cuttural and Historical Resource Issues
Documenting Cultural Resources
,
Many historic homes, farms and sites exemplify the history and ��- •� `
culture of the Spokane Valley area, but proportionally few have
been written in historic register nominations. Designation
requires owner consent, does not pose undue restrictions to the
property owner, and can be a planning tool for government by
identifying sign�cant properties. ► �A ��� � ;
.F,. ,:.
. : >' -.' �
Archaeological Sites and Security , }t �, ,�
. il�i'y�
State laws require the protection of archaeological sites on both '�- '�
public and private land by directing that the locations of sites be �=; ��. -._,�_ •
k e p t c o n f i d e n t i a l w i t h i n the assi gned office because �'`` I • �:����
archaeological sites are highly susceptible to "treasure hunters � �;,'
and rave robbers." Existing lists need to be checked to confirm ,�_' -f �='�-'�'
9 .
that evidence of the site/building remains, and a better means to -'�'� � .�
identify and preserve evidence of significant archaeological sites ��: a=�' .� :_�,
is needed. -
Cuitural resources are deemed important when they are over 50 years old, so identification and
evaluation of them is a constant, ongoing process. Moreover, cuitural resources are perceived as
less important than other immediate, short-term City programs; therefore, funding and support for
the preservation program is provided on an annual rather than an ongoing basis.
2.8.3 Spokane Valley Historic and Cultural Resources
The Spokane Valley developed as irrigated agricuftural tracts in five and ten-acre lots. The apple
orchards of �tis Orchards were supported by warehouses, packing plants, and box manufacturers.
The apple industry which thrived in the early century was destroyed by killing frosi of the 1950s.
Newman Lake supplied the water that irrigated these orchards via the Spokane Canal Company.
The flow control gate at Newman Lake (a great fishing spot) remains as a ruin with its story only in
fading memory.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 22 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Open canal ditches, concrete flues, cultivated fields and apple orchards were part of growing up in
the valley until the late 1950s. A canal ran behind Otis Orchards High School, neither of which now
exists. The picture on page 25 shows an 4tis Orchards irrigation canal.
The Opportunity Township Hall was
designed by Opportunity resident and
noted Spokane architect C. Harvey Smith _
and constructed in 1912 by Opportunity -
builder and businessman C.E. Johnson. ��, "
Built as Opportunity's govemment seat, ��
r ,
the Opportunity Township Hall also �,
served as the area's community hall and -,-
a meeting place for various philanthropic � - -�'��` �
�
and other organizations including the ,� - �, . ` � � �
Opportuniry Moose Lodge, Boy Scouts, -- �
Girt Scouts, church groups, dance f 1 � �'�
studios, and we d ding pa rties. The �
Opportunity Township Hall is significant i'
as a rare local example af Spanish-
Mediterranean style architecture and for
its association with the early settlement and development of the Spokane Valley and the town of
Opportunit�r.
2.9 The Land Use/Transaortation Connection
2.9.'I Street Connectivity
Street design can have a significant impact on community development. It is important that
neighborhoods be connected is such a manner that cars, bicycles and pedestrians can pass with
ease from one neighborhood to an adjacent neighborhood via collectors and arterials. Such a
pattem promotes a sense of community.
All new developments should give special consideration to emergency access routes.
2.9.2 Traffic Calming
Tra�c calming can be defined as measures that physically alter the operational characteristics of
the roadway in an attempt to slow down traffic and reduce the negative effects of the automobile.
The theory behind traffic calming is that roads should be muitiuse spaces encouraging social links
within a community and the harmonious interaction of various modes of travel (i.e., walking, cycling,
auto, transit).
2.10 Cltlzen Particfaation
The City of Spokane Valley adopted a Public Participation Program for the preparation of the
comprehensive plan. This program identrfied actions the city would take to meet the GMA
requirements of 'early and continuous' public participation in the development of the city's plan.
Two of the public participation techniques identfied in the Public Participation Program is citizen
survey and a series of public meetings hosted by the cit�s planning commission.
In the spring of 2004, the Cit�r hired Clearwater Research to conduct a statistically valid survey of
Spokane Valley residents on a number of issues. Clearwater Research conducted a telephone
survey with a random sample of 400 Spokane Valley adults. Survey data was collected from March
18 to April 7, 2004. The majority of respondents (83°�) indicated they thought Spokane Valley was
headed in the right direction. However, respondents did identify a number of important issues
facing Spokane Valley. Concems about the economy and planning related matters were among
the top issues respondents identified as facing the City.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 23 of 36
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
2.10.1 City Center/Community tdentity
Citv Center. Sixty-one percent of
respondents indicated that having a
recognizab{e downtown or city center was ��°�
important to the future of Spokane Valley 8 �� ■ n=395
(figure right). Female respondents,
respondents at lower income levels, and gp°,�
respondents residing in one or two ��
person households were most likely to 40°�
report that having a recognizable 200 17� �
downtown was important to the future of
Spokane Valley. There was strong 0%
support among r�espondents for spending very so�wt►� N�u� s«t,ewr,� very
public money to create a city center_ �orta„� u,,;m�onan� �,orta,,, �«c�,c
Seventy-four percent of respondents
either somewhat or strongly supported
Spokane Valley o�cials using public
money to develop a city center. Only two
percent strongly opposed the use of � 1ef 5�,�
public money to create a city center ■ n=233
Most Ideal Location for a City Center Everygrean and Sprague 1
�
Over half of the respondents (52°!0) felt Pines and Sprague � 15X
the University City area would be the
most ideal Spokane Valley location for a Ntira6eau Point leyi
city center. Other areas considered
appropriate for the City Center included University City area 52
Mirabeau Polnt, Pines and Sprague, and
Evergreen and Sprague.
0% 20 40 60°�b 80% 100%
Importance of Spokane Valley Having
Community Identlty
Communitv Identitv. Only 26% of
respondents thought Spokane Valley had 100'/0
a distinct identity or something that made ■ 11 =396
it unique. Interestingly, almost the same �
percentage of respondents who said �
Spokane Valley doe�s not have a 41 � ��
community identity (74l0), indicated that 40�
having a community identity was
important to the future of Spokane Valley 200�
(76°�).
0°�
Very Somtwhat Neutra) Some�what llery
tx�irt�portant wdmpartar�t knportard ttnpatant
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 24 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Development of Community identity
Best Accomplished Through ���°
Physical or Soclal Changes g�o�o ■ n=288
While many respondents (47%) feit gpo�
community identity could be developed °
through social changes, others 40 % o
believed physical changes (28%) or a 20 0� 0
combination of both physical and
social changes (25%) were the best 0%
means fOf accomplishing the Physlcal changes Soclal changcs Both Important
development of community identity.
2.10.2 Community Aesthetics
The typical pattern of development along the major streets of Spokane Valley did not appear to be
of great concem to respondents. Just 22% expressed dissatisfaction with the current type of
development along major streets. Further underscoring the general lack of concem about the
typical pattern of development along major streets, only 23% of respondents indicated adding street
trees and landscaping to major streets should be a high priority for City officials. Lower income
respondents were more apt than higher income respondents to report that making streets
pedestrian-friendly should be a high priority for City officials.
SuppottlOppositlon to Development of Small Commercial Centers Close to Residential
Nelghborhoods
Respondents' opinions (graph right) 100%
regarding the development of small gp% ■ n =396
commercial centers close to
residential neighborhoods, were also 60%
sharpfy divided. Just under haif of the
respondents (46%) were supportive 40��0 2�% ��� �
of developing small commercial 20% 15 �6
centers close to residential
neighborhoods. 0%
Strongty Somewhat Neutral Somewfint Strongly
oppose oppose support s�port
Priority Level: Stronger Controls on Signs and Billboards ln Spokane Valley
Opinions regarding the priority City
officials should place on stronger sign 100%
and billboard controls were very o ■ n =398
mixed. However, 67% of respondents $� /�
indicated that Spokane Valley officials sp%
should place a medium or high o
priority on stronger sign and billboard 40 ,� 0 33°�6 �� 33%
control and as such, it is probable that
the majority of residents would be 20% _
supportive of stronger billboard
control and sign regulations. p%
Low priorlty Medlum prlorlty Nlgh priority
2.10.3 Results of "Unscientific" Survey
During the community meetings held on the comprehensive plan, city staff made available the
survey questions contained in the city's community survey. Meeting attendees were asked to
complete the survey and either retum it before the end of the meeting, or to complete the suroey at
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 25 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
home and mail it to the city. In many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the
responses of the formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are
right of the survey itse�f. The following are the results of the 'unscientific' survey:
How important to the future of Spokane Valley ts having an area of the City that is
recognl2ed es the "downtown"? Would you say...?
The responses to this question _
are very similar to those received i��
during the formal community ■ n=177
survey. The results above reflect �
that out of the total responses of
177 on this issue, 102 or nearly �°�
58 percent felt that Spokane �� _ 33•�G __
Valley having an identifiable 2s°�o � 19X
downtown or city center was � - --
either sornewhat important or ' 4 �'�
very important. This is compared a �
to 40 responses or 22% indicating very somewnat Neither somewnat very
that an identfiable city center was important Impo�tant import�nt unlmportant unlmportant
either somewfiat or very � nor
unimportant. unimportant
If you feel a devetoping a"downtown" is important, whlch of the following areas of Spokane
Valley would be the most ideal location for a downtown?
Those respondents who indicated that having an identifiable city center overwhelming (?3%) felt
that the University City area was the most appropriate location for establishing a city center for
Spokane Valley.
_ 9° � 1
4°/fl
10°�
,
4%
73�6
■ Unlvers�ty City area ■ Mirabeau Point area o Pines & 3prague
o Eve 8 Sprag ■ Oth
Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2- Land Use
Page 26 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
In your opinion� does Spokane Valley have an identity or something that makes It unique?
The resuit of this survey question is somewhat different from the results of the formal community
survey. In the formal survey only 26% of the respondents fett that the City of Spokane Valley has
an identityr or something that makes it unique. The results in the graph at the right indicate that a
majority of those surveyed at the community meetings (52%) feft there was something unique about
Spokane Valley.
� _,
100%
■ n=170
ao°�
60°� --
39% 34
� - - -
13°k
20% 50� 9%
0% �
Very Somewhat Nelther Somewhat Very
important important important nor unimportant unimportant
unimp
How important to the future of Spokane Valley is having a"community Identlty? Would you
say...?
When asked how important to the future of �oa•ti
Spokane Valley is having a distinct ■ n=155
community identity, an overwhelming �X
majority of the respondents (73%) felt it is ,
either somewhat important or very important 60 '� �s•,c a2',c
that Spokane Valley have a distinct identity. �
This is consistent with the results of the
formal community survey where 76% of �°� — —
respondents felt it is important for the city to
have a community identity. °%
No Yes
Would developmeni of a"community Identity" best be accompllshed through physical
changes, such as the development of a city center or the building of gateways at the maJor
points of entry into the city, or through soclal changes� such as more community events like
Val leyfest?
� �� .
When asked what types of changes � ■ n=�so
would be needed to develop a community '�
identity, a majority (57%) felt that both sa ,� �°ti
social and physical changes would be
necessary to accomplish developing an �ox
identity for the city. This is somewhat ��,,� 28x
different than the formal survey where � —
only 26% of the respondents felt that both o •,�
physical and social changes were equally Pfiyslul Chany�s Soc�al Chanpes Both Changes
impo�tant to develop the city's identity. �"'��y �""P°'�"`
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 27 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
Do you conslder adding street trees and landscaping to maJor streets In Spokane Valley a
high, medium� or low priority for city officials?
In terms of community aesthetics, a
majority of the respondents (59%) fett �oo�c
that adding street trees and • �°�s
landscaping to the major streets in �'
the c'�ty shouid be either a medium or �
high priority for cit�r officials. This 4�x 4�x
result was identical to the resutt of the � — -
city's formal community survey where 18 �� _
59% of respondents felt this shouid �
be either a medium or high priority for � oX
�h@ Clty. Law P�iorfty Medlum P�iority Hlgh PNority I
2.11 Goals and Policles
Resldential Goals 8� Policfes
Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential
neighborhoods.
Policies
LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential
neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the Cit�s land use
regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or
higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land
use regulations and joint planning.
LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for
innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments,
accessory dwelling units and in-�ill development.
LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve
residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian
circulation.
LUP-1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and
adjacent to residential areas. Open space dedication shall be proportionate to
the size of the development.
LUP-1.6 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, bodies
of water, vistas, and simiiar features) using site planning techniques such as
clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size
averaging.
LUP-1.7 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only when
spec�c criteria are met. Criteria may include:
• Substantial changes within zone change area.
• Clear mapping errors.
• Adequate facilities and services (e.g. sewer, water capacity).
� Consistency with densities in the vicinity of the zone change.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 28 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities
commensurate with the community's needs and preferences.
Policies
LUP-2.1 Allow and encourage a variety of housing types in designated Mixed-use areas,
especialiy in the City Center area.
LUP-2.2 Use design and performance standards for residential developments to achieve
integration in commercial and Mixed-use developments. Performance standards
should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Encourage variations in
facades and rooflines to add character and interest to multi-family developments.
LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve
residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking
and transit uses.
LUP-2.4 Residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common
open space. Open space areas shall be proportionate to the size of the
residential development.
LUP-2.5 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging,
and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they resutt in
residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing
neighborhoods.
Commercial Goals � Pollcies
Goal LUG-3 Transform various commercial buslness areas Into vital, attractive,
easily accesslble mlxed use areas that appeal to investors,
consumers and residents and enhance the community image and
economic vitality.
Policies
LUP-3.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue RegionaV Community Commercial
corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the
comdor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at arterial
intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation.
Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development
should also be encouraged.
LUP-3.2 Encourage large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial
nodes around arterial intersections.
Goal LUG-4 Provide nefghborhood and community scale retail centers for the
City's neighborhoods.
Policies
LUP-4.1 Integrate retail developments into surrounding residential areas with attention to
quality design and function.
LUP-4.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and
senrices.
LUP-4.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers
to allow for ease of pedestrian movement.
LUP-4.4 Encourage Mixed-use residential and commercial and office development in
Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility with nearby uses
can be demonstrated.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 29 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
LUP�4.5 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by
regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers.
LUP-4.6 Develop community design guidelines to promote common open space, public
art, and plazas in commercial and office developments.
LUP-4.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and
vehicte circulation in commercial, office and Mixed-use developments.
LUP-4.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage commercial deve{opment to locate along
the street edge (where deemed approp�iate) to provide pedestrian street access.
LUP-4.9 Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safety provided
without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety.
LUP�.10 May provide incentives to encourage developers to include housing in mixed-use
projects.
Goal LUG-5 Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Row Overlay designation.
Policies
LUP-5.1 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Row Overlay
designation that are complementary to automobile dealerships.
LUP-5.2 Develop appropriate development standards for permftted uses within the Auto
Row Overlay designated area.
City Center
Goal LUG-6 Create an Identifiable City Center that serves as the social, cultu�al,
and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valtey.
Policies
LUP-6.1 Define a City Center with distinct boundaries, unique building types, and special
features.
LUP-6.2 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high
capacity transit system.
LUP-6.3 Focus on improving the existing character and image of the Cityr Center area
through appropriate development regulations and design standards.
LUP-6.4 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City
Center including, but not limited to, taller buildings, increased floor area ratios
(FAR) end permitted uses_
LUP-6.5 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is available
for anticipated development.
LUP-6.6 Allow for a variety of uses and maed-use development within buildings or
complexes. Ensure that mixed-use development complements and enhances
the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area.
LUP-6.7 The City should always consider City Center sites regarding potential civic and
cuitural uses the Cit�r devetops, such as a City Hall.
LUP-6.8 Provide incentives to attract cuitural and civic uses to the City Center over which
the City does not have direct control, such as libraries or recreation facilities.
LUP-6.9 Develop land use regulations that encourage higher density residential uses on
the periphery of the City Center area in close proximity to high capacity transit.
High density housing should be accompanied by residentially oriented retail and
service uses.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 30 of 3fi
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
LUP-6.10 Provide amenities such as community services, parks and public spaces to meet
the residential needs in the City Center.
LUP-fi.11 Provide an effective transition between the periphery of the City Center and
nearby lower density residential development.
Goal LUG-7 Provlde a balanced transportation network that accommodates
public transportation, high occupancy vehtcles, pedestrlans,
bicyclists, automoblles and fntegrated parking.
Policies
LUP-7.1 Improve traffic circulation around and through the City Center by extending the
street network and creating smaller blocks.
LUP-7.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation by providing public sidewalks,
street trees, street furniture and other amenities.
LUP-7.3 Require clear and safe pedestrian paths to enhance the pedestrian network.
LUP-7.4 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by an identifiable
walkway.
LUP-7.5 Allow for on-street parking on the intemal City Center street network.
LUP-7.6 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the
existing and future transit system.
Office Goals 8� Policies
Goal LUG-S Create appropriate development standards for Office designated
areas.
Policies
LUP-8.1 Allow commercial, residential and recreational uses in conjunction with permitted
uses in Office designated areas.
LUP-8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to
provide a safe and attractive woricing environment.
Mixed-use Goals 8� Policles
Goal LUG-9 Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster
community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle
and reglonal transit.
Policies
LUP-9.1 The characteristics of a Mixed-use area should include:
• Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service;
• Public transit connections;
• Safe, attractive transit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways;
• Buildings that front on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches
and frequent bus stops;
• Multi-story buildings oriented to the str�eet rather than parking lots; and
• Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking
structures.
Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 31 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
LUP-9.2 The mix of tand uses allowed in either the Corridor Mixed-use or Mixed-use
Center designation should include:
• A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, town
houses, two-family and single family dwellings on small lots;
• A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores,
theaters/entertainment, restaurants, personal services and speciatty shops;
• Publiclquasi-public uses and/or open space;
• Professional Office and other employment oriented uses; and
• Commercial uses that require large land areas but have low employment
density and are auto-dependant, such as lumber yards, plant nurseries,
warehouses, and auto dealerships, should be prohibited from either Mbced-
use category.
Industrial Goals 8� Pollcles
Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and
ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes
adequate to atlow for future development as industrlal uses.
Policies
LUP-10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated
for industrial uses.
LUP-10.2 Encourage e dive�se array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley.
LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs
in industrial development projects.
Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy (ndustrial areas should be
designated and protected from conflicting land uses.
Policies
LUP-11.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in
areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and
recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area.
LUP-11.2 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited
to ensure an adequate land suppty.
LUP-11.3 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for
industrial areas.
LUP-11.4 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture andlor
assemble products on-site.
Goal LUG-12 Designate and protect a variety of strategically located light industry
areas.
Policies
LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in
areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercial
and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area.
LUP-12.2 Light industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping
to provide a safe and attractive worlcing environment.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 32 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
LUP-12.3 Retail outlets shail be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or
assemble products on-site.
Development Review Goals 8� Policies
Goal LUG-13 Develop and malntain an efficient and timely development review
process.
Policies
LUP-13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously
evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate.
LUP-13.2 Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer pre-application meetings
in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently.
Urban Deslgn and Form Goals 8� Pollcles
Goals LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment.
Policies
LUP-14.1 Use performance and community design standards to maintain neighborhood
character, achieve a greater range of housing options, and to create attractive
and desirable commercial and office developments.
LUP-14.2 Adopt specific regulations for designated aesthetic corridors that:
• Provide incentives for aesthetic design;
• Require landscaping buffers adjacent to roadways;
• Limit sign height and size;
• Provide performance standards to adequately screen intensive land uses
that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storage, exterior heavy equipment
and/or exterior fabricatioNassembly.
• Prohibit off-premise signage and billboards.
LUP-14.3 Establish standards for the scale and intensity of commercial, retail and industrial
signage that protect views and minimize signage clutter while allowing adequate
business identification.
LUP-14.4 Establish a°cap and replace' system for billboards.
LUP-14,5 Designate aesthetic corridors along major transportation routes to provide a
positive image of Spokane Valley. Aesthetic corridors shall be located along the
following routes:
• State Route 27 from 16�' south to 32" and Mansfield to Trent;
• Appleway Boulevard (south side from Park to Dishman Mica);
• Mirabeau Paricway from Pines to Indiana;
• Dishman Mica Road from 8�' Avenue, south to City limits
� 32"� Ave. within the City limits
• Appleway 61vd. from Barker to Hodges
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 33 of 36
City of Spokane Vailey Comprahensive Plan
Historic and Cultural Resources Goais 8� Policies
Goai LUG-16 Identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures.
Policies
LUP-15.1 Continually identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine
which should be preserved.
LUP-15.2 Link cuttural resource preservation with local economic development strategies.
LUP-15.3 Establish and maintain relations with Native American tribes for the presenration
of erchaeological sites and traditional cultural properties.
Land UselTransportatlon Connection Goals 8� Policies
Goal LU�-16 Provide a street aystern that connects neighborhoods.
Policies
LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a
pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by
foot, bicycle, bus or car.
LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a
system of fully connected routes.
LUP-16.3 Require adequate emergency evacuation routes prior to approving new
development or redevelopment.
Joint Planning Goals and Policies
Goal LUG-17 The City of Spokane Valley should contlnue to coordinate with
Spokane County and neighboring cities for adjacent urban growth
areas.
Policies
LUP-17.1 The City should coordinate with Spokane County to ensure appropriate service
provision and land development prior to City annexation. Methods to allow for
coordination may include, but are not limited to, execution of an interlocal
agreement between the City of Spokane Valley end Spokane County to:
• Establish guidelines for development plan review, impact fees and SEPA
mitigation; and
• Define service delivery responsibilities, level of service standards and capital
facility implementation consistent with the goals and policies of this Plan.
LUP-17.2 Through regional planning efforts, the City and Counry should ensure that
planning is compatible with the Cities of Spokane and Liberty Lake.
LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning efforts between Spokane County,
appropriate fire districts, school districts and water service providers to assure
managed growth in urban growth areas.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 34 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Potential Annexation Area Goals and Policies
Goal LUG-18 Identify Potential Annexation Areas for the City of Spokane Valiey
that are consistent with the Spokane County regtonal urban growth
area boundary.
Policies
LUP-18.1 Within the existing urban growth area, identify potential annexation areas that are
contiguous to the city limits and not assigned to another city.
LUP-18.2 Coordinate with adjacent cities and Spokane County to review and update the
regional urban growth area boundary consistent with the Countywide Planning
Policies and RCW 36.70.
LUP-18.3 Propose changes to the regional urban growth area boundary necessary to
accommodate Spokane Valley's 20 year population allocation.
LUP-18.4 The City will not accept requests to annex unincorporated territory located
outside the designated urban growth area.
�� r 1 � � . � �L�- � � � �. ; � ._ -t�
t,lfi - Y-__.- i%v� '.i� •'L._f.':C�
flEf��--iNfi�f �
LUP-18.�5 Complete necessary capital facilities planning for any newly proposed urban
growth areas in accordance with the Countywide Planning Policies.
Goal LUG-19 Collaborate with adiacent cities, Saokane Countv, and affected
residents
Policies
LUP-19.1 Pursue interlocal aQreements with Saokane County to supaort collaborative ioint
planninq within ootential annexation areas to ensure consistent develonment.
LUP-19.2 Infonn affected residents. �roperty owners. and businesses in the annexation
rp ocess.
LUP-19.3 Include lanQuaQe in an interlocal aQreement utilizing the tool of annexation, prior
to urban development. to control the type, quality, and location of development in
gotential ennexetion areas.
LUP-19.4 Coordinate with Spokane Countv to work with affected neiqhborhoods upon
�nnexation to arovide a smooth transition from Spokane County to the Citv of
Spokane Vallev administration.
Goal LUG-2Q P�omote orderlv s�rowth wfthln aotential annexatton areas
Policies
LUP-20.1 Perform a fiscal analysis and arovide a service �lan for all areas qr000sed for
annexation
�up-20.2 Incorporete potential annexation areas in the Capital Facilities Plan includinq
proposed locations for new c�pital facilities.
LUP-20.3 Strive to retain neighborhood integritv in adjustinQ potential annexation areas
boundaries
Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter Z— Land Use
Page 35 of 36
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Goal LUG-21 Develoa an annexation process for potential annexation areas
Policies
LUP-21 1 Evaluate annexations within the potentia) annexation areas bas�d on the
following criteria:
• The Citv's abil�tv. either in house. bv contract. or by special �ur�ose districi,
to arovide oublic services at the City's adooted level of service
• The annexation baundery should provide a contiguous and re4ular boundarv
with cunent City limits
• The annexation boundary, where aQaropriate should use ohysical
boundaries, in�ludin� but not limited to, bodies of water, existina or future
�,aht, -0f-wav, roads. and toaoaraahv
• Assessment of staff time and expense involved in processinQ the annexation
reauest
• Review riqht-of-wav issues prior to defining boundaries of individual
�nnexations to determine (oqical inclusions or exclusions
• The annexation boundarv, where appropriate, should adiust any impractical
or irregular boundaries
• When the proposed annexation is locafed in the vicinitv of a public_facilitY.
th� Citv should evaluate the feasibility of modifv��� the annexa boundar�r
to include the public facilitv
LUP-21.2 Process ennexations in �ccordance tivitf� St�t� annexation laws in a tirnelY and
efficient manner
LUP-21 3 Generallv the CitY of Spokane Valley pref?rs the Petition Methcd o� Annexa;ion.
LUP-21.4 Ensure that newly annexed territorv accepts its equitable share of the Citv's
bonded indebtedness
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 7-31-2008) Chapter 2— Land Use
Page 36 of 36
Public/Quasi-Public Analysis
Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin
WS-1 Low Dens� Residential SF Residential District R-3
WS-2 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4
WS-3 Medium Densi Residential Multifamil Medium Densi Res�dential District MF-1
WS-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Dens' Residential District MF-2
WS-5 Commun' Commercial Commun' Commercial District C
WS-6 Re ional Commercial Re ional Commercial RC
WS-7 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace (P/OS
Section No. CP Desi nation Subs uent Zonin
WN-1 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2
WN-2 Re ional Commercial Re ional Commercial RC
WN-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3
WN-� Low Densi Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4
WN-5 Office Office O
WN-6 Office Garden Office GO
VVN-7 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1
WN-8 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2
WN-9 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace PlOS
Section No. CP Desf nation Subse uent Zonin
WCS-1 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Estate District R-1
WCS-2 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2
WCS-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3
WCS-4 Communit Commercial Communi Commercial District C
WCS-5 Nei hborhood Commercial Nei hborhood Commercial NC
WCS-6 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS
Section No. CP Desl natlon Subse uent Zonin
WC-1 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2
WC-2 Low Densi Residential SF Residential District R-3
WC-3 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU
WC-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2
Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin
WCN-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU
WCN-2 Medium Densi Residential Multifamil Medium Densi Residential District MF-1
WCN-3 O�ce Office O
WCN-4 Commun' Commercial Communi Commercial District C
WCN-5 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1
WCN-6 Hi h Dens' Residential Multifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2
WCN-7 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3
WCN-8 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District MUC)
WCN-9 Parlcs and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS
1 of 2
Public/Quasi-Public Analysis
Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin
ECN-1 Mixed Use Center Mixed Use Center District MUC
ECN-2 Hi h Dens' Residential Muttifamil Hi h Densit Residential District (MF-2
ECN-3 Parks and O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS
ECN-4 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2
ECN-5 Low Densit Residential SF Residential District R-3
ECN-6 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4
Sectlon No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonin
EC-1 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU)
EC-2 Offiice Garden Office GO
EC-3 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Densi Residential District MF-2
EC-4 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3
EG5 Office Office (O
EC-6 Re ional Commercial R ional Commercial RC
Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent tonin
ECS-1 Low Densit Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2
ECS-2 Parks and O en S ace Parks and Open S ace P/OS
ECS-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3
ECS-4 Hi h Densi Residential Multifamil Hi h Dens' Residential District MF-2
ECS-5 Comdor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU
ECS-6 Medium Densit Residential Multifamil Medium Dens' Residential District (MF-1
Section No. CP Desi nation Subse uent Zonln
ES-1 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Suburban District R-2
ES-2 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4
ES-3 Low Densi Residential SF Residential Estate District R-1
ES-4 Lvw Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3
ES-5 Communit Commercial Communi Commercial District C
ES-6 Medium Densi Residential Multrfamil Medium Densi Residential District MF-1
ES-7 Corridor Mixed Use Corridor Mixed Use CMU
ES-8 Office Garden Office GO
Section No. CP Desi natlon Subse uent Zonin
EN-1 Parlcs end O en S ace Parks and O en S ace P/OS
EN-2 Medium Densit Residential Multifamil Medium Dens' Residential District MF-1
EN-3 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential District R-3
EN-4 Low Dens' Residential SF Residential Urban District R-4
EN-5 Hea Industrial Hea Industrial I-2
EN-6 Li ht Industrial Li ht Industrial I-1
2 0� 2
PubliclQuasi-Public Property
�
� } � -��: ��� �
�� � -a . , — � . _
, � .� , ,-�►- ,. `
� T�� s�an 6aMaN� ��;� � � �
s�..�. � r �� E�I�st �VOrth
r � - st Cent , � � ,+�
= �a ~ I � i ! � — � '�' -
� J' �"�
_ � a ,
: , — � � � _ ,� � ��.,�-_
, ' ` - e. �
C •� i ` v
�IIITst-C�ntra�T f�16Rrr ' , -�
A! N �.-`- f '� .�._ ,+ N f _�___ � .
f ' � , - = i � f .,�_ I
_ _ 1 _ _ — _ F , , -
_ � ,l.f •�
_� �--
; � ` -"... !1_ � I �! .--, . " �
� -
' — � — � . r �r
�` _ � _
* � `�__ ' � _� 1
• j� W�/ — - '� : _ �� ` �� �
_a_ '
_ ,�..�- ti��- � ._ r �rl — w .
�- - -- � -.� ` .
� � F�.. - _ � _ tr t �" ;_. � r,�
�
TS �..
r � K� � 1 � � � � t f
� - '- v. � �
i \ '�_ +.� I �- - ��
i_ �
� -- � � �`
1 _ '� �� l_1...
��� � �
j ♦�yY
, I — • AL
— ��_ 1 1 H -�
1 �. T
— — ,,' " . � �.r�
�� � 1`" ` � . i �:
/ � �
T
� `,�� -, 1
1 1 �
� C
�_ ���
_ �,
. __�11ve � e' I
Valfey I _ I � �'
W Y��bYWaY�- 1 ',� .! V�1�1s�wq-
Nlxon �,
�� � � MA atrl �
4' � -�_
__;___
,� . IRlvers( J _ g �� --
�.
� fi�
t����� t���t ���f� i����s��f1�NRi�r�i���� ������i���������ti�� {�b��.����■ ����� ����� •��� ������ ����t�r�MS�r�������i�����!t�•
� '
� t_. � , ,, : ; �.,1 sc' ���•� � i�+ ' �
:.�nd- --- - — - � - l � "�. � �nd ws- �� -- - Ao 1ic�
• � ! � , � -�— a S� ��_� - _ - _� f ����
. � �. �_� -- �� �HDR_" _�_ _: rin RC
- µ _ �-�_- _ _ -.-- _ - � � 4 3h�J'``L— _. 4 - � Y � � t � r
•t I
�II�Ir
`_ +�tj� � --� �,� � 1 � Sth : -- S_�
� � d' Ora1I� 1 � th , �P�OS�4
�_ c �Pq1_��I _ I � � 1 � � !�
e�. ��a�'''�— —�� - � Legend
�-- - � ° _�th_ . `� i
� �_ �._ a— t�,� �� WSPQP
. � _
� � WS-1 _ r �.
= W S= 2 �- L D R �,, �+ MD� I'L PaP1D
� � � . ws-�
�
� LDR ltth _ „ �� �:� �- ws.z
��� �
� `� ' , �����.����.■.�������..� , � �
- � _ .��.
� —�-- r ' � t � ` .-� � � - �
� J � �, �
� � 4 � � � _ ��� = � /�/M'�1 � YVS-rJ
'�,i _ `�` S � �� _ 11 f I� �,� r � _ WS•6
=/�*tf���� 1%/ /111 s 16�f ` � , � � - WS-7
I� � � � �
� � � �sy� lath ___l�
� �
� �
= ,� ��� ` '� � �� , 1//�Il'�'�
: �r �' � ��a
1�i���/�II���i/������L �
� M���w,�
� .' $6 _ ` �
F�s �� -- - —
�� - — Y9� ,
qlki l �O�ivu : � � � � �
� ' ' �' �
- � eilvywa,�� _ / � Valleyway i_ _ . ��
�- _ } , ��'�; �� Nixon �. �
�
_ - -- - - - ` ; - ` �'� ' Maln_ r H...,�,_.�_ �-- - -.� m
; i � � _� .
_ _ � Rtverslde -
c _ �
ro � � - �- -- -- __�.^--- �
�r�nl tt�n ttrtt� �it�rtjt�4fi9Y4i�r��ese�i�����i�i�e��a�e�r��i�� �i�,�������f�r����■ t� ir������r r����l��t���r*r�r��*�itt
• � �at - I , ' �_ o se ..;.. � � M ��.T
. --- _ � �� - - - -a - �- � --
- ; � . � � ws-s �- ���=�
�3C1d� _ Y i �9�� _ 2nd_._ - �: �5-4- - _*+ A��� 7�t� �-
= y - - �ws-s
' 0 ����,� i so� �' �90 a ,a+ i���' � C I M F-2_ _srd ---- �.��� RC
- -- wza 5 o N — _ . �► = �, �----1-- I .-�., �,� - �.�r
�– _�_�o ------; a�t,_ _.;�� -_ _
s�i�- ^ - — • _ - — I � �� _ _ 4:t1_ 1� �a. � � � r
� Sth : � � '�—�, _� ; � _ 5th �' - �� � � I I r
' �` _�ar��� � � _ � 6th 1 �- — . s�n. �P/OS�L Legend
� v \,Polfi �� �+� ,' _�q � , ������; WSPQP
i�-- � � _ .
� �� � � '�
� — _ . . - —� � _ - � � �e �� PQPID
� c =`--� I _ _ �._ WS=3 �L � WS-1
_ WS-2 �° WS-1 �� c� MF-11?ac'r, �'t' =� ws-2
� �• �"
: R'� � R•3 �� tn_ — � _ � � � (�– _1 ws-�
� _ �l� , 2► � it - WS-�t
� T--- � - �tt��r����lt��������1t�It
' � �� i ��`� � � vvs-s
-
� , 4 c ��' � � � 4� � ` _ �� `�.
�� J� � ��— = i --- . �M� - � �''h a - WS-6
�` �' a ,�r� _ � ���r � ,'� � �
_��� � � � � '���o - WS-7
! � � � •��°
�/��ft�fft tt����1���� � L
�
r �
� � �' � c �ey Iw °. 1 �
= � ° �N,-h- � n�n
� c � � m ��� ������ � O
y � / / i �� �r
�` ��_� r `, � p
tt /�t���1���/����/�1��1� �-�—y' �
� �4�:•~4�r
L�gend �� t �� � u
-
WNPQP ��'' �
� �� :
wN-8
�+o y� `' k � :LDR
� �., • .
. �
-
- `""'� � � � �
�
0 �•� � � i � ��M --
.�-
♦t � l .---` _ �-
� � r, ������ sde _-� �.s� _.
- •��, �� � � �♦� �
- � e ,`''���� f � - N GnIl1i = - ��.�►�;" � � Morr�qgm• -
, � �
� �.� �_ _ _Nan.� . Id � N M� �� �
wrt.� nox � `- � '.y'�� _o _ -�-
. � � �� _ � f � - —
- wr+ 9 � __.�_ _ I � � n - , a� Ichl�� ��.- : �
� ,�, _�—..� Tla�t� - �dti� � ; �� t 90 � 9 _
� _._.& . � I ' � � � - -�� -
N `�1 �.W_1��' _ .
- .,
WN-7 - � _ _. ` �
- � �
Mh�lon �sa10 � ..
` � r � , , ;,: o - a L-I-,� ,----� - � a
•!��"� I $' � k+co .� � - � n
��� � � o m � ' �
��������� — °� I,�oon� ��-�" u._ Sharv i � � ; _
,���������� - � - �:�t� � '�" � � N-5 �
+ ° ' �,-� L� � � � I
� WN-� � al� N �LQ1�#n ._ 1� FF� � b � O � .:
6___. -
� �aw � – — M����_..? w� °� � P/OS � � -
�� _ ,, _.. ,I (� 1 adway -
�S � - — � • �l- �,:� : , _ ��� �.x � -
� � F - � ` �°°�'� LDR _ Q =�
' � Aikl„ 0 - .� . ,
� �
r N6
�--� �� � _ _� .
RC � "� '_
Vafl�ywe�,L
ij�IXOt1 _fi � j„ra w NI�QfI
� - - ,� .� _Maln- t � - � � I ~� �- —
� � l
�,Q/=fv�cstde� •, 3� �,,'� '�'��fl�on_ _ I .r I
: ` . �;' " :
�t�� �t�1 i� ��//���1111��1/!/�/��i1��1�/�!ll��1l�If�j/R��1i1.U.l����l�NiSiM �!!/�1/t1�Itt#ft��j��/�
- � at � ! ' �ti� , " ___1..__ ��.e�.�y _ � `' � _ - � - _�„ . - D!� � � --_..J�lL..._
i � ,-� -
.sit�i9�t1t � z' o �
W W - �
Legend � � p � �
wt�s� � ,� _
� --,� o n � n f �� WN.�
r�z s � � � I _ k R-2
WNPQP �:� ' atn►i
r:� �
s-t �t �
PQPiD �- I F3 " , -
_ WN .�= . uck I �', l
•!� - 8 a - ' - �
- WN-2 ,,, �,���e�"� � � - ach n - � �
� � ; ��*� -
� �� ,������ , _� � �, � „>> �- - *t - '� -�`o�-DQntgome
0 `"" - � ...,: ;� .-- ,�, ,d 1 :
�— _ Mansfr d \`�, �- � ' � •
- VVt�1-5 � � _ �-. � .. .
R ;' ' -� - - rs
- �$ nox � � o g _ - - � I Q�. 8 ' _ ..
� a; � 0 _ Ra 1Ch1 li�pol�
� WN•T — m - -- _' Trortt � d��na � �--- � �
.� u; ��'- �a1dw I .� a i � � 1� e�' , � �� , �� 9 � t �
� tnn�-a „ o � W N-7 a � I ��z$rt_°! :-
� _� 1 I ��r _-- :
� �-9 .��' .__ _ - �' --- - j'� � _ ____�_`__�_�'
� y ���' . : .
� � €'� �a•
_M �sto,n �4��=- - �„r
',t'' ����� ` � - �, -� -- - — dil � m I ° :
���t _ ;I� �' � €' �� Slc� __. ` �� _
� � ° ' G = t m `� � 1— � 4 � -
''���>> � _ � _ _ � ._�ti ti_ Sharp �- .,. -- ��" � - ; �.
', .,�ti�' `i � Iv �� — �I � .. r ` • ���r' J �-- — - 8��� S.� �
�s>>• i . , � �L -�►,DesmQt _�.._ _ - - t WN 'S�-a o
, R-4 _ '-�
` � catnr o � I � : � caa�do_ _ _ p .
• � � - WN-9- � �.
� � �-.
� N -1 b � - �-- � `� . � � �pF�:''.� �� !� � . o
- � � -� 3,� iu�iton! W 2ag_ " �� ��' �' P/OS = .o � �r
1=2 Bron E � - - - -
- - I e�I �__���� w
- v� � _ - � f '� ondwnyT% .._�_,� . - -V1/M_3_ _ �. " . °�
i �; W 7 �
F g ��� d � ° ���4� -Ne�'� '� R�3 — Ik�— -- `c
W,N 2 � Alkl �,� � - _!Otivo ti�� , � � � i WN-6 � �
R C , - ` -.� . _ o '; � ,vane�wav I G� �' i- '� -- -
' � _ �;��,; `Nlxo� , w� � Ixo
- ' � „,; M�in._ r� . -�:� - ��n. i �i «
� (Rtvera_i_c10 5Q ' a --h� ! . � - -
+ 1.. ,� -�-._�,-`- �
- -- �� ��.. -:... .
A�ft�tt�t�l���t����[��P#99Y14�����e�i��tlteitttUt��If.�,�t11�����r������w��tfii�itEiti� t,M�t�r�t� :trr • ---
♦ _ �` . � � � � / \
Legend ' ' ' - —
. Y
: \ � � Y � � ��
WC3PQP � ,� , I�, � z �„' , ,,
� ��
rOP'10 � .- �
Q wcs� o� � � `�°_ � f �-° _ �� -� �- �
�� �
� WCS�2 ~� � � � �' � 1� `
0'"`°r' ���� .���� ' �CS- 32na_l._s. -
� � � u �
- � ''� � � ` ��_ � , 34th � 9 , �_ �� C
�' �
�
� WCS-5 � ',. � � . �` =���� � '.�/j c �
- WC5-e � � \ 1. � 3 ��� �
��' �/ ��� �-�-.. �
�
�� � � , � � � 0 �
«�, � _i � C I � - I lQ���
• ' � � �� -
� o `�� �'�, - _
� � �� �
��
�---
, .� � ,�,� ,
� c� �� 1�CS.�4 _4,st� ; Cs�
� ; �� + � C y LDR
� � �. r �
1•�I�� � �� \
��♦,` � � � ��
• 1 � •
M�t� � ° ��, � WCS-2
� ' � � LbR �
�m
� � E
4 � �
46tfi A �
oc •
1~d1 SOUtf'1 � ' : �ti► 4Zth ; � .��
' � ; � �
,- tit i• .� W H M, , s F � i .� wcs•s
�,��,, _ _ �� � � � + - - r
� � > , �� ��r Hc
�►�� -�
_ � ''`� ' �. ` .� cs-�--,-
_ � , _ ��� 3i; '� LDR tral South
1 —. '2�a
�� —
Z���e��a�
. w�w�.��� r�. ...� +�.-f �.�F �..s� . - --
� � ';� �25th � ` �— 2Sth
on�n � �� s - �
.
� • � � °�! �+
: � > � � s N. `, �►
: t� � °. �� � .� , -', ���,
.
' 29tlt � \ �
� ! �c r4 �Q -- i _�� � � J �
m I ' �' � (�� p V C
I �: �., o �- :
Legend • � �WCS� - � `'' �
���t�����t� � —� NC
�
\, I I 1 •�. a � �
WCSP�P � � , �r- ` J -��1— � 1--"_ ��
PQPID � � ��IVC$-6�' c a ' ' �a� s � �
�► � 3 0 ���
0 �.,�cs-� � �� � f � � I ` � � ��
_ � �
i �..; ��cs-� 1\ � , ��,�? _ f� = �
Q VVCS-3 �tf ,,2 �"""' ''�' « ' � �» � /
� �'�/ '�' " � � � y ,� �-- �° �a ' � � �h�
- W�' � � '' ). � �'i \ ' R , - -�1_. '
' � �'a �
0 wcs-5 ;' ; �.� � `O�, Y.WCS-4 a� ' �INCS-3
� wCS_g - ci � �� � �
- � � 'C R-3
j� .
` i `',--- '�,. ��,' ,
♦' ��`7�'°y� � � ��' o �dra '' �
� 4 Q. � ` -
�
��r��'' _��, °' `� m , �'!43ro '� N WCS-2
� `� , � �/ N o ,
� ` ° �' � 1 2
= � � 44tn � ' _� �
� E
� O � �p AI
: �- > � _..1 =
_ �. � ..
� !q A
= � �� SL 47 �� J ���� 1 – �,��
!� r �-
� � � ar, .�,L t . t �
��ttft'�tt�t�t� e'�, No,m�rt� �i � � � r�
� "`— m , s r
+ •• J �
� � '.__ _ – .�� � �it�
f � ` � ��,� � `+
71 �'fIN� —' WC$-�
7r
_ , �.� R-1
.; -, G •
: ��nt�
� ��������������i������ ����
,��� f�i-i�1//�����/lH��llf •i�� � `����ttl�����/��11111/1���/�/I�t11�1��� --- -r �
� ; � �� t- WC=3 r ---____.�LA ' � � �___ 3�'d.—
� _. � m - �
`• � � CMU�� _ �_ .4th . :,
,� ` -- ---- __ _ dth - _ -- t �c
• �
�ir `� r � _� j `�_ � �,+
s� � c �
� \ J
3 ` � WC-4 .z � � a __. � I
• \ _ H DR � _ 7_ch _ , r--
. �
� 7th I � � � �� - ' '• I
►p�,
'n \ � _ .��Ir alh
� �_$t , - � '
'7 t/ i/� �,� he N�l Bt � i
•
� ' �
� Ntna \ e� � �
i ` '\ o �
"' 1 � ^ I �` WC-2 � � � � � ' � !
°�--- i$ �
= ~'� � � l LDR �`` �� �3 -
` f '� 'S ' � 2ttL _ _� _ . � Zth
:+ j i ` t � f � � � - --
� � ,
>
?� � '� a proy ` o $ : j —
� � C � '" � '. 1�fh�
- �o
I � $� � !� -
� , W�st Centra
�e `
7 ��t��� _ _ i�. ` _
i I � 1.7. � �
. � , �
Legend !,�� � _ 4 _�
W�CPQP : � �? �
• �
• -, Q
PCP� ; � � �_ _ .�
wGt
� - �
� W � � r� ti 1st— C �--�-f � ���/
— WC3 � � � . � � = ��►
- Wc.s i � '� � -�d 22tt�_
% r WC- -
\ J _nrd_ p�
; `���: o ', ; i Lp � _ -Rr�
, an ,
��tti��l��k7��t�t����/ 1�1�1�1 ,
� � , i I
1 I ` �
� ��_���r�„����������������� �r, -t � ►-�� fil��/l�l!l111I�/��I�IIIIIt11�M�//��1�1111111 ��������,����� .
�, , .. .�i •,r��'r�ll� il � -- — �rd--- ' p� l � 3M —
, i
\`� '� 6th 'CMU : � . . �� - : dfh _ _ "
.'!,}� �` �' -- - . - - - - -- � .:
, � �
;►.� 1 `� — - - � � � � � • i'
�, ` , � � Sth 'a�
.
� �
f � � `� nM
�
c
.:� � r --� ct � Oth a I
� - =.\ I�� th W C -4 � ath — —�' : Ttit —
��� \� � M-2 I •-�-_
� � '� � Tth z l e, � � �^,
.. - - ,$ �" � �. ath
`Yt//i 6th � �' - �th � -�—
: atchery� `� 3 � - _ .
: �`� ��, f � - -- - 9l�L_
� � Ninw �'� ` �^ � _
�
.
� _ WC-2 11t . � � �
�•• ,_oa,_ _ • �a � i
� .-_` , o .c r.
: � `? ����� R � � i 2a,— i 3 � ,
`� �� i r 1 – � �
_�+�� '�� � -- — Elroy _ o M � � _ �`�� '�" i
! � .
��,,� �� .. � �.i� c� —,�_ � '� ��lh__,�
• .. �
Legend : ���', `� -- ' _ � W�st Centra ,
�. . . -
� 16th �
WCPOP 1�������` — - -
\ i�, � '
MMD • _ .� •.�;�
• � 17th—_
� w �" � i $' � � � � '��
• - � \ _
0 w �'' i - - —
�
`��
-'"�-3 '� � - 1 t c
- wc-s • � _ 20th - -
� % -- ,:.
s 1 °�„ g � C �_ - l' ,
2.1 st r � �----' �
i � �', I '� „� � ��.
� 22nd �
i � - - � /
i � j j �+��
■ • \ \ I _2_3►d_ wC- 23rd �L' f
M�
�� ` o '� x 4th_..j� � R'2
o n � n ., ��� ,... �..;., �,,,. �.....�. H N � �E/i�� .".,..
_.: .� , �
, �.,
,� �
� WCN 9
- � � �
L end ��i,� �-. , PIOS � � m . ��'�►4" �—
WCNPCP � *� �n,..� g ,N�- �- ��--..�._. t�-
� — I � +Gl � �1�-,0- -�"
PQ� � "�� ♦ :,' � � � � _ _ --
- WCl1-t �MUC •� ~ . ti-'� '" � W- - - �
G
� w� _ S O'��h �" ' QR' �� '-., - -
. �;�� -'� .�- --�
� W�-� ��� - ,s� :
� p :� � � 1�1C N-7�yp,'� �,�, �
� wcN., — _ � /� �' '�" L'�� \ - �
t �
- wetas � •� . +�' �,� ,� . , �� � } _
- wcw.� � �� � �
o �,
� wCN-� F Lt �,)"��� `*, 4[31C �°� _ ucke v `' Q
��af! � �
- Wcta.a ` � ♦ �N��� ' 'i r -- � T o � 'ti � wGN-6 �`
� WCN-9 � -��i � � --- � �._.J�tk� ��C.3Jb � .
„ �f ,r, � - �� a•ner � DR: �, � _
o • � � _ ,'' �.M r'T? i' a � � � - - - - . . �. _
, / �a � .i IIA�N.Q��Q i - Gr� - "�'"�""'- ----� �(►fo7c� `'� r � o �' .- _�� -- _ _ o,.�� . -�
, _� : _ _;..= I L _ ;"�'SN�N-� �^ � � . _ --- —
_ _ m , _ , � �-�- _�� �WCN 9 -------��� -_�. --� ��_���d��
- i �a � � ;,O -� -�' � r+�►�; P10 S __� !���I� �„ � �€��-o _ - - ----= =�_aoF�
�
1"��:_. _ � -, � b�� `', _ ��
-`h4�-- ' f �-' - �+ �N-� ._., 14�.3usta- �.t- I "►� ' -} �,'�?sO�/lt
�
� �= "� � � � __�_ Miaslon �- � ` r�
-�� �. �i'� i _ 1 11lL�Ywell--- i b � o
/ � � ory�c- � r '�1�1�-4 � � i �
�
,�-� .,, _— C � � � - � c
�
v�� tp � ,�� �te I ea _ ..Boone . . ., � �
/ �' _ �-�� = - � �e mot � ~ N
�' st� � �l-• - n s `WCN-� E
� �Ilo. .. ; � �
/,.,,�,_ ` _ _ - � i -� — c - - - � �- � s �9.�
, � I �
�� � �
-�-� � � �wcrv-2 _ �
` Y
n.,►,�. -- Q___�_ { - o MDR .— H�, � ���o�
4�� � I I j~ 3 I� t�� `�Ll_ • � � MAIfl ;� f w C � —
�.� _ M� ,. ` i�+ � P�a�J RN�Ide - ��--� - ; iS . � q -
_ _, � � I :;, �, SPf�� ;�.
�„�,.--- .� --� :-?, — ' - - N -- ,__.------- -.�-'� -� _ - » --
...._. . _ .—
°�` , • �---i WCN 1 ��
w 2nd - '� q Oplsw�t . . a a___'dr-��Hifi� �NI�1� i1�-tl�f� _ � • ���5 � �3r I
- -v - - `� �? ', dth � � � 4 w � �
_4th �. d . - - - — . � � - �
{�� C
. �� l� �
N/CN '9 ', `st" � i � _ _ �'
9 ��
Le end o n � n _ P/OS �� A,� ,� � � o�kwe►i .�
,...m,..
� , o ,� .d
WCNPt�P V17CN�8 ,_�� 'o `� � _ � g _ _ _ _ _ u , - -
• �:�_ �- -----'� a �
PQPID �1� ,MUC ��' ��i'� � �_ _
- WCN-1 S ��Q�- < '�!�_ �a�''�� _ -
_ ������ ° N^= � ��a�`�" �'''� �
� �N� '�'ay �',����� � --"p� �..�° . _ _'`" � . � - -
CN 7 p
� � --'
� .
� wCN-a a ' d WCN-7 �road-, =�R=3 �°'�, - ..
- r �f • r = - �'" � i i
`� � � � �� N � � I Fa�R-3 _ � - ��
-`= - W�CN$ w '��t�t�s�s� _ Gmtp � _ k -,�' `�`ar� � f
=� t� _ � - aro t � � o►
�� � � WCN-7 ' � ` ���� s �t . .��..r__ -- -�.. �____,�� W.0 N -6 '
- VIFCN-8 __"� �,t ; l _ - -� Jl�ckao�+t��atb d �, - -
� � ��a , '- ■ �aji�sie � MF-2 � �
�, C - WCN-9 � � p'" :�___�: � : �t�►iha 1� ' �' ;
�� � - [�lqnsfi td �'� i �. ,..:,� � ,, �anS x � ,�
f .;�� '� � X ' �� w Kt10X ' 1I v C N=5 � ` `."; L..f�
AI
�t� a n � '�'z"��+ -r� 1� WCN-9 'W` �' i � � s�+.� _ - - �- �ndiana— ._�.
- ;,��, ,. � � � � }:�o_ _ - .. -1 _, _ �,- � gD — _ - - � �
� � v -8 �_ i �90 • � � _ --- , � '- P/�S __ _-_ =._I.'30_ _ ?C�F����'-�---.��190-_ Nora�29��FF -
- -- � �_oN-���� - � - , _l� �� : � , __ -_ � ,, -- ��o
Nora : r'�'t � �
uQustel �._�i � WCN .J� � . __.. �� Mlsalon _. _ �'� - .:�N
- -- �� - _ � C M ��cr tl___r_. , � ; _^� �- _
r=� - � - � � S Sin �" - '� I __y__ �{nt� ,- ` � , � --
� � �9�/' - - oa � '�; Sha ti A � ^- -- '°eBao�e: _ ..' I � I ��;
� _ - - - ��mot � f i ��I
. . � atc+ld�o -- - � :-,Tr � � an ., - --� � ,_. _ � �
,,;�% E '_ 4 � o allo ' � wC�-Z i4r4�
_ :;•� � aroadw_ $_ _ E_� =—WC =7 – WCN-3 M .� S�inQfl
.:���o� �_ _. ���. i : "�� u -R- � S �i�ff Iki�_ � .�
� — - ._ ml � �lt
ai i , „ ,
.�� �,_ � _ : --
'V�I1 �t�Y -- - " �''� � �� � W � N -4 N -� e�► ,
9 +NiXon ' � � m , � ,, �u� I � � --
I � � � � ._1_. . I -,� .- , Ma n � _ � � `_"'° -- rro c
gpe g* �-- -- _ ►� _ Ma�n _ A WCN-9 � oRi qiSide �� � �..�-C� �� � � � I � _p _ � �
I � - = .;�. � , 1_P%4S �..�' � _�� � i � ,". _ � _spr�c�e ��- � � _ m ..
� - — ! SP'��• S ! r- . ` - -�--� ..°,�T_'a, � - 1 c v � - x - —
�,� ; � m . � t at _ I cu S'c �' zn}d_,....�`�" W,C N , o � r� �
n
_ � - �o z- -4 QArew��'-�=, - � -�- ;o��ikirE��ri�titt�t��r�'� - ° ��, �
�_ 3rd � - � - a► aM 1 .., . � . .cl 4th— -
4 � ° �'• - I � Sth �( C� V� ' � i� -- C 1
Stl.Lu_ N
���� ��
Legend 3�� •���s�t������ =
� I A I � �
ECNPQP � �
3 �� .
sr i c „
� � = i m \ �� _
r�t� � � � � � � ar/QiRP'r
- �� � � !�� ri� ECN• �atv��,. ""�
- E • � B Im�° LDR - - _ d d�
� n � .
- Ec► �e�l�o�y � � � � �
- E� � �, • � � a� � _l�_'Q�11 �, � �- -
� � A � � . a �ro�
� �N's �! . a ' ��I � -� 3 E � Rkh � __
r�� �> Q , R ,� E r �
�,::.; ECH-6 � � � �--�� � , ,� ;, I� � o�k�n_ C N-6 ---. ' � �-� c,�- _ __ _
_ - ,
' �,,. i �, ` �� R LD.R _ i_ __._._ _�---� �
: � � �d ' _ f - -- - - ` � - °
, -., � _ --� - � ECN-4 : a
�� �� -- ��duscr��! '"
�
. \ � Y r0 � I
� Q1(d��� � �p � - I �jbC�(-�. _� �a—'�C
�M , ��d � - '�C :�,, � � , 1 i � ��yri�c C N
,,� '�,
P_� �
• �� � i
� Irtdtr�t� �1 '
p �_.. = -- --� .� � -
�-- � _Ae�tk D c �
� + ��� + � " "'
�� .
� `" � � � ; ind�st�tal � . � �
� ■ � �5
� ' - �
_�-- -� � . � \ � � � Partc �_. � �,
�- � t ��,�_ � , - .� � - __ �v�!.td " a . � a �
' N \ ��p . . • �--"�—�� .�`
���� � � � I � T
� .Fa� � , ; : -�:r .: �: EC=N�:_3 ��ry __�e�r-� A �4; ��-
s
_ _o E- �t� � ,� n �c � �`,, ECN-1 L Z �S�. � � J l
•
� � ' °� -= rv�u c - l �„�.-'
� �_ � � : ECN-2 - � � �
,
��� � fia e --�c� � � ; H D R '�� � o
b �, . .. a
� � ��� g � � - � ,
c �� , o nr9 -"-� � �', � �� �, � �- '
- �.. � 1- �L��`
( L � `
' � Indl�na--��
� � 9ha�wion _
� —� c+�e —
� —_—�_. — -
_ � � �
�_ - �( 19p � - � " :� � e� ,' - / Bp 19p °► ` � o �
-��� ='_�---�; _, _ . . W290�N, � �� � i
� - t -_- - F'� - e - - - - ` ,a, ', %
Au9u�tP' �3 �.'°--'+— o ' � - - . _,/ � 90 � �.
!lon�Ql.��. � � MislLQ� ' _ _ ����
,���� ��
Le end � ��t1 � ��� ��-f-� �� " =
9 � w � _C�. �
ECNPQP on � n: 3 �.� �.� ,,_
� � ° � � L ��� ~� I .
� ECN•i = � � w' „ „ , '" ECN-5 �s��'� �
;. `�,�
= '� Bro � m • R-3 - - - . i . � _ dy � i�
- �cN• '� � 1 � wen�i�► •
slFssh�►_-' I
~ " �.
- �e"-� T _1 - _ E �___J �e� ��_ _"�► � � < <
- �c�,� • a �— � _ " � �. � `9� tN�o� 9 � �
:� I o --r' � ._:N
� E �' S M I� � d � � _: � � � -- R{ch �`�_•
� ECN-e ; ''�. = � � � - o�� ECN-6 ` � _'� or, _ _ ��~ _� �� - -
. .. . `. ��. _ _ _�_ -
. • -� a `�-- � �- R 3 '��,���.�� : __ ���-
� �j, Lo�sSe o. � �o - - _ � - -
• � i °. ��.� � _., _- - � -
.
♦ ♦ � , m � - - -id_ os
o�a / .,,� �� • ,• - .� _ ..._�,�._ - _ - -�- E C N-4 : _�..� Prri4 A
�� ���:%� _ . . � � ���� mdusMsl � ; _ 1
Go'� �v,� � �� - � - l +i.�i rk B . .. �a - - —
Q � � _- I !� � �� �- �-P�--- �
� ���1ta••-����,�4 _-- _ - __ -- i - . • �' � " Indust al
Wnd'• .= -� . � , � � � `�� Pstk C '
� ' �. � �� o� _ w�- ', � lrtdu�
n �._ = " �� ��R_ � � P�erk Q � �S
�! -. � _,'76
f �- �� - �, _ � . _ _ �' '. �,.�PZ �' , � �s : IndSstrlei x � �" +�i
•� . I . � o ■ :. P�t1c E � �
� Ir 1 rQ11lr' ' '. � _ � J _�uClld - . -- i _ ' —'C a ,_ d
�' ,-i� M - , � � � �
.�'� � �fedOf�C + I ---� � , � i � �t
� feh'1►1�_M_ _ � � . - � c ,�• I�Iln►teW b . _ _
Q � I G s- �3 Ur - ��0,
� � � !. �
-Gr"° � ,� �ke�r� E C N-1 '. f S�'�► s a .w� -
: .- .� . . � M'dfi
�`\`\'`! ; _'� � °' _� M U C � � ,z—
������' �- ECN=2 ,,._.. � e � j.
T ,��sp�� _ � �C,�7 J � � � �• � `�` =
�� Cartlsl •s� MF-2 �y `' , � �
� ' .� rmine g ,� � . g� � �' i
C . 7tp i �--o � � _
°-- �r - - ' _ _,..��Mansfleld= _
�: �`: ; i � ^ - " '� I_nd�?na_=-- _ ►F _ x ,;
�:`��. �� - f . ,,._ �_�1, _. � sn��+o�+ _ __ _ __ _ _�._ _ - - _ �
. _�._ �-.__ �
.� �� � ��� ' �- �rt���t�-"_ � � -'" - - _ _ - - _ �," ' - �e
`���. . . � � , ; ��_ .� 190 ~ � - 1 gp I 90 � �`� a 'Q
���: � -'-`� _• _ _ __ _- �� �-1 �R � 4�ar�1 I i i I I � � � � ttf tia� f �1K290 pN � , ` �
'N _�- � � l �
AuQu�'' ,� �r ' %� � '�'" � � _ _�!� '
�a�.m � '�- � �.. _ Mlsslon s� -- �ll� �o
sslon -- -
1
�_� _ra� �Q�i����o ��������»������»����r��s�rr,,�rrr�i _ W��oo,y 1 -- Legend
��� �� -- - -- __- � �,, -- . C o m
_ � _ . Il� . p ECPQP
. a�, -EC-S
_ � _ � � EC-6 � s � rO, � i90 ��, �
� _ — - - ----Miasion___.__. — ;� :RC ��j!! E C � Ec-�
--- - --��_ ' - EC-2
4 O
'�' �!- � � `° - N EC-]
� i �` � �---- ,� ,; - �
:� �
° �' •�,, � � �
� 's � — ° : � ( , _ ~ '- -Mlaa�o� ` � �"� c
� '� h.�rp a ;� � _'_ � ` - ec-s
` ° —� � � $ � � ' � - �� � Fc-a
� �� c � �i
� r QL�ITie I a � \� r
i Oes � � � -
��_. �� _�
- EC-2 � °'� .
� •
M � � �
� � EC-3 � � W : �
� ■ HDR � e�aa�-
.��r�-_ -- � - .
� � � � ���
�;o .
: ---�-�� � C „� �
r
+ � LDR �
.. ,� � �
� �
---- ��u� - -- �.
` N1xon : �
w
m , � R1v�sl�s •�
ia . � � • � I i �
� � e w � C .� _ �a _ �
----- � C � �NefS� � •
�Rl_1fDLsIQ� j � �
•
� f � � � f a m -- �
� ; .�
----= I -- - - -Spr�gve � - - .. _ _ ,___ � � - - P�S�-- -- t _ _ _ � - - Spre� � .
� � �.� { : ; � r
�-'.�,� � t� �
� " � �b EC-� 1st �
•_ 1st - ' � � � CMV 2nd r
�
_�������������r���r������r���� r��������������'� :
a �
3rd�,j � � � N ; v �� -�
]rd_ � W - — I _ w � � I I z �Z .�j
� 41 d I $ � (a s'�
4th _ - L— �
�� sn.n"°" -- — -- — - - - _ =-� �-= `�``�-"' - Legend
.
,e� _India�� . �_ _ _-�-= Z n i n
_ – � °!� � � - - � -::� - g ECPQP
� � � � n����4F ������������n��Q � so ;:
r 1 � - - — - --- '► W290 O � POPtD
•�ora_ ^ -_ ��►tr — - N .
: , yo�� -.= = — . .. - - - _ ��� -;:_ � � � EG1
16 ; - �.�����,�.,EC-5 �
�- ����' � , EC-6 � i
^;_ -, ,
�-
� - EG2
� � _:. M►sslon _�I RC i �`��`+i��� ',' ,� _ M - EC-3
_- -- — - � __ - '__� - �'������ M - �� � EC-4
, � . ?��1l. � ,°� ,� '° ` -- � ~ j4 ��� rti: . _.- - EG5
- � � �� 7 - �
�_S#rtta__ � - :� m ;�, , ., ., � M��a� `�� - EG8
= } �ha ". _ o ' � " � oR :� » _ .
� i:i�ii� ; � ��i�i : � a � . I - � 'r F,28� -
� \., ■
� `� j f : ' ; ' '" � : ; � � �.,� _ :� -
s Q _ - - . . -= i � !i�%: .- ' ' I � �. - �
--- .A _. ��i� �
,'. L?�frtf j�" I f; � a _ `
.. _ s � ..: E _ � -�
_ _EC-2 1 �f i Cata!�g � ��"' ` -�
� �
- � � ;,, _ E _ ►
EC-3 :-' � A �: I �
I .1�. _ �• _ .� - .
� � I � . � a
- _ -_-
_ _"' �.- -a�` dwa � .
. . � N A � /r
� o �� `i ' nn fl �
. v _ �.� � EC-4.� ;
s _ '
— � — ' :;. J
� ' R-3 �
� _ on�o � - .
� . - � � ,,� �
� . .
�
- -
� � � ;- _ — _�-- _
�/ .
� . . . / N)xa� ■ �
� � t�' : �ii C � �V9f�bA w�
� � � : ,,;�; , - -� = �
.� � Main � _ � �.0 -� C- %j` � `_`�-i . i .�
�� - � __ c m �Riversl ..� � �-- 1b y �� � :
Q�VOf61�, . ��` \ ``: C � C ` ' �' �� \ �\ ���\\• r
1* •_� �� ' \� � �,�,�. •
� ��; � �-� � t �` �� - � �
: _ ��� ��- � i�' pnfl ; — SPrrflir° � --
� Spra9�a -- .-_ - .
- - � - . � I r
�_ i � �
� � ' ,, E C 1 m -
,. _ � A _, .: . � . .
� �st � ' °' CMU nd .
�������rr�r���rr�rr�i���r���r��� ���i����������� wa
?�nd r — 3rd i �v`� - " -
__ � � - � - - - 6 , � ---
-----�� �s� ---- (E S-5 � ����ir��� ECS- ��i���� r� r °
. �. � � .� �� � � Ma� - .. g�„ �
,,, _._� 3 �-_-. � „__ � �CMU „ � � � �_ a � �� � ��►!:- �
d_� t� Legend _ t �• }� -
� R � � �- � 5�11 � � � � �' � ,%Y "�� �
c ath - EC3PQP - � � �' eth � + . � ' �
> *QMO r--� � \ �� r
— � � � � � �
� Ecs-� - ` -��
_�
� � � � ' I I - \`� 10t
- ECS,: � - � p t�� . � l� � � - � � � �
c�
' � E�S•3 c ` a = � I � v ` ��3 i �� � 4
� E�S.� - _ EC—S 3 ' �' , ' �
� ���.s E rj�'n - � � $. I�ECS LDR � � --� - : ,a�, �
��s.s 1-1 D R �'��� , � n �, �
,
- aa+ _� a � �
ori � ��, _� o — o o � I �
� ., q 3 �
� A' \ u � M � ^ 1 � �
,
w r
� � 19tfi ` .t� p > -� a �' ( m , � � 1 .�
/ $p� — 2 w �
�un 1� ��sL � • � e
�.. � , - � , � a
_ �
2Qh � 1 4 � 4t h;� � _ — � I I _24th _ / ' u
1�1� y
` I �
- ?���.1� e P�Q.S .���/111����1���� 11 � '
� c.� �r�� . _ - � h ' l 1 '� � J
/ �__ —29t
� � snon �) C ,�_
� � � � �
� e —• '� � ' ,
- - �9tn�f � ���w
4 , � ��, -
s�e+,_ -
, � �� � �
� -�} ! . "�i� 1� �
� �� �
a ' � � ° 'rtta �
`� ` � �c�-- �::
- 3ath '� � �
�,}/ j �
� ` S. / �
� . J �� :� E S�i����•t
� '
, rQ__95�� t�: 1 . 1ft 1 E - .. �o-� - ��!_. .E�► — ; ,� '-c= �
�.� Y
zh `;� - ' U �y���M�ti �/�f �. a
- . • ,o " �' �� � � I �' , ; �
� � �. — 4 � I 4 th � � 1. . .
W �� ` - - C � ` u � _- , I _ i � � r ' �,'�
.� J � � .� �� .a
c�et (- �! — .� / c ,N
_ > � d '� ' ' -- �� � ( � 4
�_ _� � ° �� dth i � ,\_,� .� , �
.
� •, `� .�9Ga�_ /
- -� . a ,c �. � �.� _ __� \1pt/�., 1
- a � �0 1r
- !-� � : � i -- � ��._ � -_ -- I � � �► �
�-�.;--� c o°' � r � ��"�`' �' � �� F
� ` �` �� � - - tntt _ E C S-" 'h I w � � `�° � �
E » � r---� � {�'' � ECS-3 LLR� a � � � � �;� - � �
� p
— - � � �� t � � � r / "
_ --- ��>. � � � � ' "� h i
�— � � , - - ;
N; _" � '`�.E�C�S-4 ° 17t� v y � �
,
l �i � � ;� i
� 1ath __ 'i' �`� M�=2ts '� �a�n_ � � � � ,
� j --'" '�,� -__ ��� � � w � � �+ � �
� � , z `� • ' �
an-- �'� � r�� s�nr �.�.. — --� �• �tom �_ ,J
G % _ ••- ��, __ a � _ � � �
� I � - � Z1 �S� �� � ; c — � �
Z \ �� i �� ` I
�� � .. ` / . �
� � � r ���� �
_ �J �' + � • -- � —J t
* �.�3 4 __24th � EC. - _ r , zsn,, .. -- � , _ �
--� ._2scn _r � � / `��
., �`� � � sw,,, � ec�, --�
.� .
l�
� ..�61�_. J P/OSr ,. �������r����tr �i��-
���' .�� �_ _� _ 1 „� �, _ r ; �
, _
.� � �"` ��" � � �' ; � � � Legend
-� � �, � eno � c �
- . � � - fl ' ', � I ^ �
� — � � 8 = �� �— ��( � �-i- � ECSPQP
, U *
, , � — , � r. ( � �+o
� .
�� �—�-�- 0 34tn_. ' _ `'�� � O Ecs-,
�� d, �
� � �.�- � ��;� r �
> � d --J o' i = - �cs-
� - �
� � 3� - . � ECS-3
�
p , J 3�,_ C���+ � - Ecs-�
�� �o ��; . � � ;� y '� � ecs.s
,� �3 �� S 1 � � � r � Ecs.s
� r '° R-2
et i ��
lal�'�°^ -�� f �� i I �- �. 190
� E � � � f °� : ES-8 '�'t����u�- �n i�s�� ,� __ irrn Legend
� - -- -
• -� � o�dway -_�
� "_ O____���dwey � �--� E8POP
� n9A�ld � �
sPL�9 Id �, E A�kt I~ �I __ � PQr1D
� , � � � �. ( �s-,
E : '�' I � ° v� � c o�lv_ ( � - - - - -� 1�'+� 1
i,p ; � I � a v+�QX �`'�- ,P : � Es-2
�I1�ywsyL�—;y _ � � G ' -- �l �le�CN'�
i M � S E5�7 , � N_ � � ES-3
� � � G '�C M U ES-6', '_ r�`, - M.1 [� �,�
`� = ES-5 � � �A
�u I u I�IDR R �Q� - ES•5
�'' L P�9
� Sn� u�
- � ! S C � -- � � � � � Es-s
� �'" � cr� t � � ES-7
n n r _
T I G. _ �� �r�
I _ 4� � � : �� �`
- r - - �
- �ES-4 ` � y /" sn± �
. �
I LDR � � � � �'� °
�.� m � � ' � S� � .
- M r ,r, � �� N � �, Ze �
� q ` ` _ Qth . ,//1. � c �
E S•3 T � / • �I - � w
LDR �an �� � = ��'� f ,_ "; = ��,�
� � � � I , • •'•►►
� � � - r
s ,� �� ��
,� � � � d r b� � �
3t ( '� � . �
�e � E� +��� _ ES-2 �
�ea+ ' g ' LDR ' , ��� .�r��� ������r�������i�ri
� ' �•
— �_ r� � ��
, �� � - o m
,, }�� .
�- �-� :
;� � � .
� ��+• ,
, , i� ..
��► r A, `�����
� ; ' �� � ��
' ������� � y �
v
I � �� ~, ,� � �
nn �
-� smQt , � -
� �rg� �f�.• ��, a r � � `catatdo Legend
� � atalaO ` ES_8 ' j�'�'���������� — ��19i�N���FF �90�'�+���ti����
, ,"�, ; n � ESPQP
� w_ GO srnsdway_ �L�- _3►' __,- arvadway �
, ` ngfi ^ w PQPID
Springl'�Md ., c E '" Alkl i `
I = I � _' ; R � ES-1
� ~' �d
o n -:". i - o I � o 'd �5 0 � c O � -- P �o`�"' �: � ES-2
� o � I � I � 1cY - - - 1 � , �-. � •
M II�ywAy o _�v`N � ;� �- V�Ileyw� � ES-3
( - -- � � n I __ ES 7 � ��-= - - i . r_� : -�Nix � � Es-4
.� .
� � � . _�-' Mefn
lcle ' �
� 5 ,- � C M U E F 6 ' R�r� � ES-5
., ES- ! M -
� I � C Sp►ague __ - . , : � � SP��9u � ES-8
-�--
� - � � �� � '
` ` � . 1 st � _ oa�i � c . � -� � � - ES-7
_ , � i � --� ES-8
n
i --_ •---
2 � a►- � c -
� c' � - ,3rd y c 3 -�
. � A� ' � _ 14th _1�_ _ 4th-„��:
' � � ES-4 —"- y �� th- • ` ro ��
; ,� ! -- --� �" �
� �
i , 0 / � ✓ " va � 1e -��1_ -st�'-__-.� � '" � '
� ,�L � � ° � �
�1 � .� �� R�d9� � � � : m ,, I� �
� f �' I
� , a g�_ � � �,' ` _8th . ,�����,, m �, /� _ ���I�/d
�� ES-3 � � �,
) � Qth� � � ���������� -� � ��i���
".'_ R 1 _=11th� ��`� ��`a � ,r ����►���, +
� 1 � I � `� / a �� � ' l� ' 7�
� �
�o � ' � �- ' � �
� � t _ - .
�... 1 1,3t n, � �,V,� � •c __ :
� �ath -- - __ � F � ; ES-2 -� �
� �, `—" - ES'1 J, -
`_ � R-2 -, � ����R���������������r����r �
__ �--�. ' � •
. � onin
.
..
3 � h ��, r �
�,� �� � � c '� �� � :
o t' .
� � �R� -
� �'� �� �� '`''�� �
, h � � c � ; r 4 '�iwi
� �' ` � ' ,� '�4 �
E � � � �
� � .3� � � ..�:.; ' `3 � ,,N 'b�
a r 1/1���� � ; r 1 � �^�
_ U�_ �� ■
y EN-3 '� � '=
�� ��'�.� R-3 as� ve►� `��°���`, = o n � n
� `� choal Bro���.s"��- �..�w
�j� " -� '� � _ ' � � Le9end
.
E vA � a " o- ' Horo ��'_° �c ' ����t���� � EN�C�P
� �, _� J� ,,,}. _
� PCPID
-; " � _ __�� EN -6_ =i Rlch � . 1, ,.�. _ � �u•�'`` � _. ' �
�- =t;� :. _���u+� � � ��
�Jeu_ � -,... __-•_- --- - � -
----. f-1 '
��- ., . -�_ g Ot`�= - _- - - - - �•- : - - EfV-2
" - �"r L � -�umbl , '� - � EN-3
I, � �
~ � P:a�k A.,� � � EN-4
�"
. � t' dustr�nl � A � �
Klem� �t�rk 8._ � � : - �
� , � I�dustria! '�' � :
� � _ ' Pa�k C � � - EN
� � — - — Cour�tand .
� I�dt�stria! � � � � � � __ �--� �
(G` � � __Peric D. � � z w, � �a �"�'�� , •
: i� � � � Induq I � _ �r � W Li�-� _ - • i
o _ � � P.l�� '�` v � _Oaltan � __ -� _ = �
--- _ i� - .—__ ,. , �n ., = a , � a — . _ � -- �..
� ':. v► � � :
� f � r � '� � EN-5 EN �'lyb'w �
Failrvl@v� � a- '--�uttidl; � �' �
o. c- �> � R,.. �,��� { ', �
� � ,�' a 1 `1 �B!!� � - - �
� � �rt�� ' ett� �
�..�:� -- EN-1 ,-I �� errtn�, �
' � � � PIOS `�- �� •
� � ry � �
" � � �- �
�~�'`� � � �� IMsmitl�ld ��yyY ; - an�4�' , ' ;3► a ;..
--�-5n
.� - � .- >> .
_ - _ _ �nb,► �n ,';; "'� � lndi _ � w�� n �
� o '" � ' � —� � � � �/ ��' Sdm�� :
� � o � g � - ��+- i � ����
��� 1� ��. V O � �, � a�
� ��ti ��� ' � r E B'� ' � �Q
- - - �. ,Fj� �— MIIEl10T1 C �
-- _ -- --_--_—_ _.. - + !�'it� � � __ ,� � � � � � �
r;; . -: , :_ � --� , ` -�-.� sinto E N 2 � , _
'� � -''�'- \ '`�� ' �� *i; � 9 �' - -- _ _ _-- - � � �� I � _ _ =
o �� E - , � - --- oe -
� A I � � ; �1��� ff � _ - -- �
Queen
or�ma��_m EN-�3 �����i� Legend
5 ��� � ,M - LD �tval ��t11�f" ��� ENPaP
gct�oo) Broa�1c ,rn'"" I.
� c� o - � i � ♦ �i��� 1T• �t1� �� PCir10
m � �� � V ta � oa ��+ 10 � o I � ` �� t �. t��� = — erv.,
t _ - _ AQh� . � �1�1 � EN-2
� /� � R �� h vf ► ..
I ! I _ —� � t,L���' .�
' --r--� 1 �- �i i ►l1� �. �,
��� --, �BQ Tr�t----- - ------ t � � �
_� ` � -- - - - - - -��`�' _ _. � _ -'_`_' ` = »,::.. EN-4
""'....---- � -�tts�al I � � - �.5
" �p fk. q ' � cD �
—-� ' I�dustriet ��O I I = � EN'�
KIRLt1A►L�' R . � �4
- � � � I dustr�el !" ' � �
� I ��I
`` � � I dustflal �Ark C L � ����^�' EN-6 �
��� „ w « � ',~ b �« � ' -
I� � I Indu trial N v �,Lc I w u�._ �( L� �
o I . P_urk E ' � � ..—Q3l1i�n �_ �
--f �d � � �` ��---
�_ `�� C A . . .- . � i
_�----- . - - a � , �
: i� Y o� EN=S` �"EN����+ �, :
�rv,a� � om
. Q ` 1 LDR.� � k � � =
� .��-� � �,-� �.
� � � µst� �� � _ M�rtetta �
- ��_ _�- EN' , '� � ;-���! , �
,-
a P/O '� ` �'� .
_. _ -. - - - � rY 1 O' N .�� �
� � � 1 � �� I
� M�n Id � ° _�.. •
c IndUN!� � ,� I n9 �Y --� r , '-
�--'�"� � � A ,, � � ;Indl�na t�� . ��
.�� � � �� ', �_ � C � Cf � d Q .�.
� �- c � ��'`
�� � ' 8 ' C� o C [ �
Q � � � d i � 6i
�.. r " �' . ���_ � � �
k � ` - w .�g ;�, .
'-_ � � � s. v �
�= _ �� ���+�-- ' �• _ SIntO _ � E } � 2 �' �
� tl � '�9yo��;r� _ -__. _� � st►�rn� � _N�DF� =
s o �._ � eoaie .
` "
4 � �' � ' h�r���,�� � r �d �� 190 ta�do �
E �3 $''� - j �t�ht11!!• ilfl�����������[!
lS �� ' - �Broaciw� ..
�In Id
■
a er — rans o a �on
� ��
'� � . �� �: _ ,;��, ' -- �;.�,� -� _-�� � ��, Map 3.2
�
�'` , 1� � Bike and Pedestrian
l! _ � 1 1 �_ �
% �( �.
_ , , � System
� � ,1, ' _ .. - , ' � 1'Isr.',r'� F � • '� • I � t r �'
;t� ,C ,�: nL'+ .,. ''r .a i . r� , . 1F.ib., , I
• � '.i,�., � � • I l
C�ty O� � �� ! i < _ _Y � , _yi/-.� • , - . ., - � � ��, � ���� � - � ugcnd
S O�nC `` �,•,• ��' ' � � ' : � ',��'�I��ie�nlr �� � Y �.n `
� y�.i l�a: �-,� � I. � .,' f�nw��a•r:�tl���1' .:r \ 4M�� . • •/����� •���• c.
siKw �..+c ,..�� ,� •' `I , _ - - -- -- a YicTeM �.w. dwiRat�
1�1� a�cbl llne.rJn� I I ,� � • _ .� �/�� • � � .. - �
r�rw �j, � z _ � - � ►« .��- � SLu�d 11u Ml�
� i li. ' -. -�. � .
�r r►-. . ,a�l�, , �='�"�" -` � ' � �•x
�'.z.Kt �!� - i� -'- _r �..L:si �`'y. -- �i! � --- �. . .. a o f�pppMds�f� Vp ��1
� r
_ . ,.r. , _ � jA1ti �T;1itI 1!'OS ,,�`.-.� . �� r, �.>
i.�..�„ ', §;-i-! '_ ` .� I • - —_ y -�'- •i w..brn. 1 �: x' I . �-_.
u:��,: ti.� ` -��i� 7 �-: a� - •�� v Nti!�� ��rk . :r `�-� `fn{ - �� E�7tlef IIib lJ�
-!,,�c,�. I � � r ;�...��.t I {' - � ��° %
. <: `" t �� - - , .-�- T - '�`� . . . . hoQo.d 6,t, tin.
-i� � � � Lt �"�-�--...__� i, �t 't? � �" hrt J � � � �- �; }!
� I � � _ F�.� �. � -� _��-•� � AIInM• �•' -- - � ' � Y -- •� � � L - i�� �:.I i � SI� �il� SO�t�IMy
-�w 1•i� - ' i _ � _ " � � Y ' - "
� r � - , I ".=-�- rti - , = "� �` ' l►l�Lr '�:.� r �Ci y�ot �. seu.d w1.1�
� J \ -' ,. ''�Libcrty
_ ' L-_ — z_�-=, ,� � � : : . L .! I r � `+ .. — s. w - �c� y � , � -- . t . =-" �� � r.e..v� r.�
c;
[ ' r ( � — 1 i`. �y ! c►,�.w i.�lkt
� ►`- ` I +- � � � � • prpppNd r�i�D l�1!!l
w,..a... j � � , ` � �, � ��.i ..`� : � _ � _ i i
� •.
, _ r «� �
_ r r � • � � �i , � - ; -r I � , Oui i r - - � � � � m �ft��ttidl
► � ti�. � � . - � � ' I ��
��,�, i . 1-, A fw �h T���►i�r - T y � �111Mf�b4I1
" « *.� � � ' -+���� ! �ir4 HLM� �' i ; � � Schooll
� ;;:;2 ` ~ :_._w�e �.�:, i r+' v -; �: ` a s� s � �,� •.�' JM. �. . . . .° . - �. . . �.Al + ._� �,-^-}�. .. .. � •� • l � r' � � � �..w. Rukwd
o , �''� � � --� .S6 J
i r � � 1
--i� _; ti. �„ti, - - -----.. � r _ . •i � oth.rl�AuniGPaili..
Y , « f , , ;r'. ,- ' � � , .. .�
� 1 _ -'��r
� �_i.,►A•�urr . ir� �
� , T ' . � �� -;- l � ��. � Ctt�' olSPoktet V�1My
` r.�a - ��..a��;���;ii�iF; �.ti �;�, rJ �..•-� ' � � � �,`"`' -��_. �
.► _ Urbu CxwNb Mw
,,, ; �.; _ ..._ _ � �- �� . --- �
�,•, -,� ,�?� � �:��---:�b � � � � �"` - � �
� i- - -, -. -�-, , � ; n r . � ,.,�t . .'�
i '.�� i' . � �.�i � r' - � .
"t, � 1 , -��!!''� - ' � _ -� - Knt'Y �MY 1. ,�,1`.b'� ' �y�.� WNIf80d�s
� , - y ' 'i'� � y � '� - �-.- �� L r _ P - i r 9 �,.,� ~ �_ .� _ �. �.� ! C; S
��' - � ,
� � r1 .7�� f ��� ► `I�' f � . t �_ r' � . �, � �
\ - �k } +, b,`� �i `.
�' �� '` . ' :ni��� . �-' � �, ' l, � ^ t:. .-��
�� r � �:id�1 ��� T __1 �
M �.. �._ _� ;r , , I • I � �
• � qa � / . , 4 ('inir �� � " ti. � pl d
' � 1 ' � ' `} -! Dirw �_, � � � ,
a:(�
► "� 4 .i� I' ( �
y �� 1:+� t ,. ► � r' I "%t4!! -
__J.1�.._ r lfy�n�� , �;*._ . l"... r � - .
' �' � �' ^ � ,w. ` � DUes 1=/1]/700� � C
� � " i C 9j� P
� �. �. "� � � � � � _ , �.
i-: . — `_" _ `r`y 1 `
. �
� I'�_^.� ��li�'"/��
� � �i:� -' -• � �i � 0 O.S 1 I►Ylw
' - r � "� � r � , 1 'r I ' - .
•, � 't 1 � t . , , � � . �
'-' � ` , � t - �(�, � ' �f"�� t �/ N.wa. ?7Kp�fi�rwa�wniAonn�nditrsaput�+�wplkdfain»nsa
'`�` �_ �•- :,k t1 �� u+�nct� mI u nA/at W ctsWaq rstiueaa TAi C�ly �nla nn tk�u
�' �-• i �� ( � . �� r ,,,� � ��. ,,, , Cy�ry�� ir �w.wrtra aA�w ihr �cn�nr,Y n cwrrrn� of Mw wp ww1
'r - I� � l � ", _ � � - � � , �*�aaly d�lau�r k�1rYJiv errw� a�l anua��u rn w rnmeu+.
a
� t =____� � .� -^, / ` y '�•— : +r,�. .,,s� � ; T� �N� a�y �n �. c,�• �r,y �.+► vd��. c�a.
- , 1 �., �cr� . � � � r,r,�k�...an.p.i.wr rJ�a,�rx►yrw.wn�. r�,M� ol�.raoa
_. I I ��.�h "a �
�. . i� � 7 •.;, �.. , heMr� M �r LYl �1 ��a� YrrT. (.�111 IM�Yl�� Ap1rw�
■
a er - a � a
...
ac� � �es
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
CHAPTER 4— CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES
4.0 Introduction
The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires new development to be directed to areas that either
currently have adequate public faciiities and services, or to areas where facilities and services can
be delivered within the 20-year time frame of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP).
Facilities and services that are required for new development must be adequate and available at
adopted levels of service (LOS). Locally established LOSs help to define and contribute to
Spokane Valley's quality of life.
4.1 Plannlns� Context
This section provides a review of the policy directives included in the State's Growth Management
Act (GMA) and the Countywide Planning Policies relating to capital facilities planning.
4.1.1 Growth Management Act
The GMA refers to capita) facilities planning in two (2) of the thirteen (13) statewide planning goals.
The two relevant goals are:
• Urban Grr�wth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities
and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
• Public faciliUes and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to
support development shell be adequate to serve the development at the time the
development is available for occupancy and use w�thout decreasing cuRent service levels
below locally established minimum standards.
More specifically, the GMA mandates that the City prepare a capital facilities plan which contains
the following components:
• An inventory of existing facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations
and capacities of the facilities.
• A forecast of the future needs for such facilities.
• The proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new facilities.
• At least a six financing plan that will finance such facilities and clearly identify
sources of public money for such purposes.
� A requirement to reassess the Land Use chapter if probable funding falls short.
4.1.2 Countywide Planning Policies
The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP), originally adopted in 1994, contain a number of goals
and policies regarding capital facilities and the provision of urban services. Those CWPP relevant
to capital facilities planning are as follows:'
Pollcy Topic 1— Urban Growth Areas (UGAs)
Urban Growth Area Designation Process for New Incorporated Cittes:
1. The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will assign new incorporated cities an interim
population allocation based on the Office of Financial Management population forecasts
and previous allocations to the former unincorporated area.
� Note to reader. The fdlowing policies are numbered according to the policy number in the CWPPs, resufting in non•sequential
numbering in thls document.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 1 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
2. The new city will conduct a land capacity analysis using the Land Quantity Methodology
adopted by the Steering Committee.
a. The city will first determine land capacity inside its limits and then will examine the
capaciry of unincorporated UGAs adjoining the jurisdiction's boundary.
3. The new city will develop the Urban Growth Area proposal as part of its comprehensive
planning process.
a. The proposed UGA shall be presented to the Steering Committee at a public meeting.
The new city must justity its UGA proposal, showing how the interim population
allocation will be accommodated.
b. The city must show how the area will be providing a full range of urban services within
the 20-year time frame of the comprehensive plan.
c. All Urban Growth Areas lying adjacent to the new city should be analyzed and either
proposed as the jurisdiction's UGA, a Joint Planning Area (JPA), or proposed to be
removed from the UGA and converted to rural land.
d. The city will show its work by presenting its land capacity analysis, urban service
anatysis and other information as appropriate.
4. The Steering Committee will conduct a public hearing on the population allocation and the
Urban Growth Area and/or the (or Joint Planning Area) proposal. The Steering Committee
will vote on the proposal and will forward a recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners via minutes from the public hearing.
5. The Board of County Commissioners may conduct a public hearing on the proposed Urban
Growth Area, and/or the proposed Joint Planning Area, and population allocation. After the
hearing, the Board will approve and adopt, modify or return the proposal to the city for
revision and/or adoption.
a. The new city shall include the approved or modified UGA and/or the JPA in its
comprehensive plan.
b. The new UGA or JPA will become an amendment to the Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan by incorporation.
Policies
1. Urban Growth should be located first in areas a�ready characterized by urban growth that
have existing public facility and service capacities to serve such development, and second
in areas atready characterized by urban growth that will be served by a combination of both
existing public facilities and services and any additional needed public facilities and
services that are provided by either public or private sources. Further, it is appropriate that
urban government services be provided by cities, and urban government services should
not be provided in rural areas.
Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all lands within existing cities, including cities in rural areas.
2. The determination and proposal of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) outside existing
incorporated limits shall be based on a jurisdiction's ability to provide urban govemmental
services at the minimum level of service specified by the Steering Committee. Jurisdictions
may establish higher level of service standards in their respective compr�ehensive plans.
5. Each jurisdiction shall submit proposed interim and final Urban Growth Area (UGA)
boundaries to the Steering Committee, including:
a. Justification in the form of its land capacity analysis and the ability to provide urban
govemmental senrices and public facilities;
b. The amount of population growth which could be accommodated and the analytical
basis by which this growth figure was derived; and
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �-�7-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 2 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
c. How much unincorporated land is required to accommodate growth, including maps
indicating the additional areas?
8. Each municipality must document its ability to provide urban govemmental services within
its existing city limits prior to the designation of an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation
outside of existing city limits. To propose an Urban Growth Area (UGA) designation
outside of their existing city limits, municipalities must provide a full range of urban
govemmental services based on each municipality's capital facilities element of their
Comprehensive Plan.
11. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall, at a minimum, demonstrate the ability to
provide necessary domestic water, sanitary sewer and transportation improvements
concurrent with development. Small municipalities (those with a popufation of 1,000 or
less) may utilize approved interim ground disposal methods inside of Urban Growth Areas
(UGAs) until such time as full sanitary sewer services can be made available. Each
jurisdiction should consider long-term service and maintenance requirements when
delineating Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) and making future land use decisions.
12. Wrthin Urban Growth Areas (UGAs�, new developments should be responsible for
infrastructure improvements attributable to those developments. -
18. Extension of urban govemmental services outside of Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) should
only be provided to maintain existing levels of service in existing urban like areas or for
health and safety reasons, provided that such extensions are not an inducement to growth.
Policy Topic 2— Joint Planning wfthln Urban Growth Areas
Policies
1. The joint planning process should:
a. Include all jurisdictions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Special Purpose
Districts that will be affected by the eventual transference of governmental senrices.
b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities.
c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst existing municipalities and emerging
communities.
d. Ensure the ability to expand urban govemmental services and avoid land use barriers
to expansion; and
e. Resolve issues regarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals in
designated joint planning areas will be coordinated.
2. Joint planning may be accomplished pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into
between and/or among jurisdictions and/or special purpose districts.
Policy Topic 3— Promotion of Contiguous and Orderty Development and Provision of Urban
Services
Policies
1. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to address how urban
development will be managed to promote efficiency in the use of land and the provision of
urban govemmental services and public facilities. The Steering Committee shall specify
regional minimum level of service standards {see Table 4.1) for urban govemmental
services with the exception of police protection within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). Local
jurisdictions may choose higher standards. In its comprehensive plan, each jurisdiction
shall include, but not be limited to, level of service standards for.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 3 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
a. fire protection; b. police protection;
c. parks and libraries d. libraries;
e. public sewer, f. public water,
g. solid waste disposal and recycling; h. transportation;
i. schools.
Tabla 4.1 R�lonsl Level ot Servlce StandarQs
FACIUTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOS)
Domestic Water Supply - Minimum Levels of Service for storage capacity and 1i�ow shell be
conslstent with the Washington State Departmer�t of Health requiremerds and the Spokene County
Coordi�ated Water Sysbem Plan requfremenba (where applicable).
S�rstem Design — MiNmum Levels of Service for pipe sWng, flow rate, and systemadc g�id
Domestic Water development shall be conststerrt with the Washington Stete Department of Health requiremertts
and the Coordinated Water System Ptan requiremeMs (where applicable).
Fire Fiow — Flre flow rate and duraUon as wefl as flre hydrent spedflcations and spaang shail be
consisteM with local �re autt►orfty requireme�ts or the Fire Code, which ever is more strtngent.
Incorporatad areas wip be provided wfth wastewater collectio� and transport systems In
accordance with the adopted sewer cona�rrency requ(rements of the Jurisdicxion. Uninoorporated
urban growth areas wip be provided with wastewater coltectlon end transport systems fn
accordance with the requlraments for sew�sr canc�rre�cy a3 set forth In Spokane County's
Development RegulaUons. Collection systems and transport systems will be designed for peak
flow conditions so that overflows, badcupa, and dlscharges from the syatem do not ocwr under
normal opera�ng sltuations. Speci�c design cciteria sha11 confomt to the requiremeMs of the
Washington State Department of Ecology and local regulations. Wastewate� calleWon and
Vansport systems will convey wastewater to cerrValized wastewate� treaUneM fadiiUes.
CenUal'¢ed wastewater treatrnent and efAuertt disposal fadlitles will be planned, designed, and
San'itary Sewer �s��� to provide e�luent that does not adversely impad the quality ot surface or ground
water of the State ot Washington. Planning and design for wastewater treatmeM end effluer�t
dlsposal facflities will be based on 20 year proJectlons of populaUon grovvth and current water
quality c�iteria es esteblished by the Washington State Department ot Eoology.
(CeMralhed wasfewefer b+eatmenf facilldes shaN be e part ot a sewage system owned or operated
by a cKy, town, mun�ipa/ corporatlon, courtty, po!ltica! subdlvfs/on of the state or other appr+�ved
ownersAlp conslstlr�g of s oollec�tion sy�stem and necessary trunks, pumping facll�les and means ot
tlnal daat►nerrt and dtsposa! and approv�ed or under permlt from the Washington State Deparfinent
of Ecology.)
Transportation Mairttain travel corridar time ss establlshed by Spokane Reglonal Transportation Coundl.
Ftoodin� of property outside designated drainage de dralnege easertfents, flood
zones or other approved drainage fadlitlea, during the deslgn preclpitaUon or ninofl event
prescxibed In the standards of the goveming local egency o� jurisdictlon, shall be prevented wtthin
the reasonable probablllty effobed by such standards. Impact to bultdings and accessory
Stormwater s��$ 5��� be avolded to tt�e maximum exter�t pracxicable by evaluadng the elfects ot a 1 a0-
year raln eve�t, and impiementing measures to ensure that the n.mofF attendant to such eveM Is
directed away from such buildings and acoessory structures. Arry stormwater dEscharge to surface
or g�ound waters muat meet federal, state and local requlrements far water quality Veatment,
stwrnvvater runoff and Infiltradon.
Law Enforoeme�t Each )urfsdldfon shall spedfy In fts Comprehensive Plan a leve! ot pollce pmtec�or� that eddresses
the safety of fts c�tze�s.
Llbraries Each jurisdiction wlll spedfy its own level of servioe.
p� Each Jurisdiction will spedfy fts own levei of aervlce.
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 4 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
Tsbie 4.1 Reglonal L�vel ot 3ervice 3tandards
FACIUTY LEVEL OF SERVICE STANOARD (LOS)
Solid waste processing will meet Federal and State regulations, including maintalnin� any required
Solid Waste faciliti�s licenses.
Each Jurisdict�on within the non-atleinment area shall de�elop and use a street deaning plan,
000rdinatlng witli Spokane Cou�ty Alr PoAutlan Control Authcrfty (SCAPCA) as ttie ove�stght
agency, to meet mandated Perticulate Matter dust standards. Each Jurisdic�on's sVeet cleaning
plan wfll describe the progrems and methods to be used to reduce particulate matter emissions
from paved surfaces. Each plan shall address but not be limited to the fotlowing: 1) Street
Street CleaNng �p�� �uency and technology to be employed. 2) Fadors for determining when and where
to initiate street sweeping following e sanding event, with the goals of expeditious remova! when
safety and mobility requir+ements have been saGisfied. 3) Sanding reduction goal. 4) Sanding
materials specificatlons to be employed. � Locations, application rates and dreumstances for use
of chemical de-icers and other sanding altemat�ves. 6) Ider�tification of priority roadways (over
15,000 average dafty Vaffic counq.
Publlc Transft �urtsdictlons wlthln the Public Transft Benefit Area (PTBA) shall have polides conslstent wtth the
level ot service adopted by the Spokane Transtt Authority Board af Directors.
Urban areas jurisdictions in excess of 5,000 population, or once a population of 5,000 persons ts
achieved, shall be served by Flre DisUict with at least s (Washin�ton Sun^ey and Rafing Bureau of
Insurance Servk.�s Ofl`Ice) Class 8 Ins�uance Rating or better. For the purposes of GMA minimum
Levels of Servloe, Class 6 or better shall be based on the ISO Grading Schedule for municipal �re
protec�fon, 1974 edi�on, as amended, by using the fire d�SU1cl, flre servioe communicat(on, and fire
safety contrd portions ot the grading sd�edute. The total deficiency polnts Identifled In these
portions ai the ISO or Washington Survey and Radng 8ureau schedule shall not exceed 1,830
polnts. All )ur�sdldions, regardless of stze, shatl ens,�re that new development has a Fire Flow and
Ffre and Emergency hydrartt plaoement per the Intemational Flre Code adopted by that jurisdictlon. Urban areas must
Services � yWthin 5 road miles of an operating fire statlon that provldes service with a"Class A' pumper,
unless struc�ures are equfpped with �re sprinkler(s) that are rated In eccordance with the edition of
the Intematlonal Flre Code adopted by the Jurlsdiction, and Is located wlthin 5 road miles of an
operatlng Rre statlon that provides servlce with a Class "A" rated pumper. Urban areas shaU be
served by a state certifled baslc Il�e support (BLS) agency. Urban areas should be served by an
operating basic tife saving unit within 5 miles; and an operating advanc�d life support u�it within 8
mlles or 10 m(nutes respor�se time fo� those jurfsdlctlons with urban are�s In excess of 5,000 In
population; and basic I'�fe suppo�t and advanced life support transport service.
Publlc Schools To be determined by indfvidual school d(sMd CFP.
2. Each jurisdiction and other providers of public services should use compatible information
technologies to monitor demand for urban govemmental and regional services and the
efficiency of planning and services delivery.
3. Each jurisdiction shall include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure that obstructions
to regional transportation or utility coRidors are not created. In addition, each jurisdiction
should include policies in its comprehensive plan to ensure sustainable growth beyond the
20-year planning horizon.
7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimum, the following policies to
address adequate fire protection.
a. Limit growth to areas served by a fire protection district or within the corporate limits of
a city providing its own fire department.
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-Q7-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Faci(ities
Page 5 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
b. Commercial and residential subdivisions and developments and residential planned
unit developments shall inctude the provision fo� road access adequate for residents,
fire departmer�t or district ingress/egress and water suppty for fire protection.
c. Development in forested areas must provide defensible space between structure and
adjacent fuels and require that fire-rated roofing materials be used.
9. Wellhead protection plans should be coordinated with water purveyors and implemented by
locel jurisdictions. The Steering Committee shall pursue strategies for regional (to include
Idaho jurisdictions) water resource management, which sustain projected growth rates and
protect the environment.
10. Each jurisdiction shall include provisions in its comprehensive plan for the distribution of
essential public facilities.
13. Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) which uses land
efficiency, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated
extension of urban governmental services, public facilities and utilities for new
development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (six to ten year
increments) within its Urban Growth Area (UGA) or establish policies which direct growth
consistent with land use and capital facility plans.
Policy Topic 9— Fiscal Impacts
Policies
1. Each jurisdiction shall identify, within the capital facilities element of its comprehensive
plan, capital resources that will be available to accommodate the additional development
which is anticipated within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs).
4.2 Essential Public FacllitiQs
The City of Spokane Valley is required to plan for essential public facilities (EPFs) pursuant to
GMA. Spokane County adopted through the CWPPs "Growth Management Essential Public
Facilities Technical Committee Report" in 1996, which set forth a model project review process for
the siting of EPFs. All jurisdictions within the County are required to provide a mechanism in the
Comprehensive Plan to utilize the model project review process either verbatim or as a model.
More recentfy, the Washington State Legislature passed two laws addressing siting of EPFs. In
June 2001 the state enacted ESSB 6151, and in March 2002 the state enacted ESSB 6594. These
laws require counties and cities fuliy planning under GMA to include a process in their
Comprehensive Plans to provide for the siting of Secure Community Transition Facilities (SCTFs).
A�"secure community transition facility" (SCTF) is the statutory name for a less restrictive alternative
residential facility program operated or contracted by the Department of Social and Heafth Services.
As stated in RCW 71.09.020, "... a secure community transition facility has supervision and security,
and either provides or ensures the provision of sex offender treatment services." The program
offers 24-hour intensive staffing and line-of-sight supervision by trained escorts when residents
leave the facility. A less restrictive altemative (LRA) placement is defined in the state law as a living
arrangement that is less restrictive than total co�inement.
In response to these new state laws, planning staff firom all jurisdictions in Spokane County formed
a task force to cooperativefy develop a regional siting process for all essential public facilities,
including SCTFs. The Essential Public Facilities Task Force, with assistance from the Washington
State Office of Community Development (OCD), the Department of Social and Health Seniices
(DSHS), and technical staff from the jurisdictions developed a regional siting process for essential
public facilities titled Spokane County Regiona! Sifing Process for Essenriel PubJic Facilities. Table
4.2 below lists EPFs that are either wholly or particalty of located within the Cit�r.
The regional process provides for a review process with a location analysis. Public involvement
takes place throughout the process with public comment periods as well as public hearings. The
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 6 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
review process requires the applicant for an EPF to assume responsibility for the bulk of the
analysis and processing of the proposal. The analysis includes two parts. First, an analysis of
functional criteria of all potential sites is conducted to select the highest-ranking ten (10) semi-
finafist sites. Second, these ten semi-finalist sites are analyzed using more qualitative criteria and
resulting in selection of at least three (3) preferred sites. Both analyses include public comment
periods.
Next, the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) conducts a public hearing on the Preferred Site
List to allow for further public comment, identify strategies to address any issues associated with
particular sites, and rank the finalist sites. The BoCC ranking is advisory to but not binding on the
applicant. Last, the applicant, after selecting a specific site, will work directly with a local jurisdiction
and its regulatory requirements to pennit construction and operation of the EPF.
The regional siting process is based on a coordinated inter-jurisdictional approach, which in
combination with consistent development regulations among the jurisdictions will implement the
requirement of equitable dist�ibution of EPF of a statewide or regional/countywide nature.
Tablo 4.2 Inwntay of �al Publk Rsdlitles
3fgnHtcanco Cat�gory Nama Addnss
Statewide Regional Transportation Facilities Interstate 90 NlA
-- - --+ —
Statewtde� Reglonal Transportation Facilities � Cer�tennlal Trail N/A
Regional Reg�onal Transportation Fadlities Pence-Cole Valley Park 8 Ride 414 S. University Rd
. and Trar�siUTransfer Cente�
Reglonal Reglonal Transporta�on Fadlitfes Pines Road/l 90 Perk 8 Rlde E. Monteamery, Pir�es Rd
& I 90
Regional Regionsl Trensportation Facilities STA Malntenance - Bowdish � 23 S. Bvwdish
(Fleck Service Centet)
Regfonal Regional Tranaportadon Fadlities SR-27 (Plnes Road) N/A
Regional Regio�al Transpartation Faalities ! SR-280 (Trern Avenue) NIA
- —1- -
Reqional � Solid Waste, Wastewater & Water FaGlities ' Val{ey Recycling-Transfer 3941 N. Sullivan Rd
! - -- —
Valle Hospital 8� Medlql
Reglonal Sodal Servioe Facftitles ' y Center �2606 E. Missian Ave
Reglonal Sodal Service Facllftles ' ��n�j�aN�o�ral Health I 127�5 E. Mission Ave
4.3 Goals and Poli�ies
The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals and policies of the GMA and the
Countywide Planning Policies. The City of Spokane Valley will implement the goals and policies for
services provided by the City. Special purpose districts, such as water, school, end fire, are
encouraged to implement the goals and policies that are under their control. Spokane Valley
intends to coorclinate with special purpose districts when they adopt a�d amend their own system
plans and capital improvement programs.
General
Goal CFG-1 Provide facilities and services that the City can most effectively
dellver, and contract or franchise for those facllities and servlces
that the City detennines can best be provided by a speclal district,
other jurisdiction, or the prfvate sector.
Policies
CFP-1.1 Review plans of service providers within Spokane Valley to determine
consistency with the SVCP.
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q1-Q7-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 7 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehenshre Plan
CFP-1.2 The City should seek a balance between the quality and cost of providing public
facilities and services.
CFP-1.3 Optimize the use of existing public facilities and promote orderiy compact urban
growth.
CFP-1.4 Coorciinate the construction of public infrastructure with private development to
minimize costs whenever practicable and feasible.
Capftal Facilitfes Planning and Level of Service
Goal CFG-2 Adopt and implement a Capital Facilfties Plan to ensure public
facilities and servlces meet Level of Service Standa�ds.
Policies
CFP-2.1 Facilities and services shall meet the following minimum Level of Service
standards:
TabIQ �.3 Spokat�v Valley Leve! o! 3ervlco Stsndards
Facllity or 8srvics Lovel oi Service Standard
Domestic Wate� Meet the minimum Regional LOS'
Sewer Public sewe� requlred for new developmerrt
LOS D tor Slgnaltzed Irttersectlons
Transpartadon
LOS E far Un-slgnatlzed Interset�ons
Stormwater Meet the minimum Regional LOS•
Law Enfo�cement No mfntmum LOS adopted
Parica 1.92 ecres per 1000 residents
Ubraries Library District to set LOS
Solid Waste Meet the minimum Regional LOS'
Street C{eaning Meet the minimum Regional LOS'
Public Trartsit Meet tfie minimum Regional LOS'
Flre and EMS Meet the minlmum Reglonal LOS'
Publlc Schools School Distrids to set LOS
' See Page 4 for Regtonal LOS standards
CFP-2.2 Update the City's Capitel Facilities Plan annually to ensure that services and
facilities are provided efficiently and effectively and to help establish budget
priorities.
CFP-2.3 Planned expenditures for capital improvements shall not exceed estimated
revenues.
CFP-2.4 If adopted level of service standards cannot be maintained, the City shall
increase funding, reduce level of service standards or reassess the Land Use
Element.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9, Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 8 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Public Safety - Fire and Police
Goal CFG-3 Provide police protection efficiently and cost effectively to Spokane
Valley residents. Coordinate with flre districts to ensure adequate
flre protectlon and emergency services for Spokane Vailey citizens.
Policies
CFP-3.1 Encourage inter-jurisdictional cooperation among law enforcement agencies and
fire districts to further develop, where practical, shared sen�ice and facility use.
CFP-3.2 Develop a comprehensive emergency management plan that meets the needs of
the City and coordinates with regional emergency planning efforts.
CFP-3.3 Require adequate emergency vehicle road access and water supply/pressure for
new development within the City.
CFP-3.4 Encourage property owners to create a defensible space between structures and
adjacent fuels and require that fire rated roofing materials are used on buildings
in forested areas.
Water and Sewer
Goal CFG-4 Plans for water and sewer service should be consistent with the
SVCP.
Policies
CFP-4.1 Review water and sewer plans to determine consistency with anticipated
population growth, future land uses, comprehensive plan land use policies and
development regulations.
CFP-4.2 Coordinate sewer planning with appropriate jurisdictions for consistency with the �
SVCP.
CFP-4.3 Support continued planning for domestic water needs in partnership with water
purveyors, the Joint Aquifer Board, Washington State Department of Health and
the Washington State Department of Ecology.
CFP-4.4 Encourage public and private efforts to conserve water.
CFP-4.5 Discourage new, private domestic wells within the Spokane Valley City limits.
CFP New development must connect to public sewer and water.
Solid Waste
Goal CFG-5 Promote the reduction, re-use and recycling of solid waste.
Policies
CFP-5.1 Establish a City Hall recycling program to present a positive example of civic and
environmental responsibility.
CFP-5.2 Participate in updates to the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management plan and support its impfementation.
Stormwater
Goal CFG-6 Ensure the provision of stormwater facilitles and related
management programs that protect surface and groundwater
quality, prevent chronic flooding from stormwater, maintain natural
stream hydrology and protect aquatic resources.
� Adopted April 25, 20Q6 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 9 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehens'rve Pian
w Policies
CFP-6.1 Require stomnwater management systems for new development.
CFP-6.2 Create and implement a stormwater management plan to reduce impacts from
urban runoff.
CFP-6.3 Best management practices should be utilized to treat stormwater runoff prior to
absorption of runoff into the ground.
CFP-6.4 New development should include the muttiple uses of facilities, such as the
integration of stormwater facilities with recreation and/or open space areas, when
possible.
CFP-6.5 Encourage the use of altematives to impervious surfaces.
Library Service
Goal CFG-7 Promote efflcient and cost effective library service to Spokane
Valley residents.
Policies
CFP-7.1 Encourage continued free, re�iprocal library services among all libraries within
the Spokane region.
CFP-7.2 Lend use regulations should allow siting of library facilities in locations
convenient to residential areas.
CFP-7.3 Worlc collaboratively with the Spokane County Library District to develop long-
range library plans consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Schools
Goal CFG-8 School sltes and facilities should meet the educatlon needs of
Spokane Valley citizens.
Policies
CFP-8.1 Develop land use designations that allow new schools where they will best serve
the community.
CFP-8.2 Consider the adequacy of school facilities when reviewing new residential
development.
CFP-8.3 Assist school districts in their planning processes.
Concu�rency
(3oal CFG-9 New development shall be served with adequate facilities and
senrlces at the tlme of development, or within the time frame
consistent with state law.
Policies
CFP-9.1 Implement a concurrency management system for transportation, water and
sewer facilities.
Financing Growth
Goal CFO-10 Conslder a variety of revenue sources and fundfng mechanisms
including, but not Iimited to, Impact fees.
Policies
CFP-10.1 Identify and pursue sources of revenue for financing public facilities.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q�„-�QZ-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 10 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Essentfal Public Facilities
Goal CFG-11 Coilaborate wfth all Spokane County jurisdictlons in determining the
best locations for public and private essentlal public facilities.
Policies
CFP-11.1 Follow the process for s�ting essential public facilities as set forth in the Spokane
County Regional Siting Process for Essential Public Facilities.
Potential Annexatton Areas
Goal CFG-12 Provide capital facilities to serve and direct future qrowth within the
Citv of Spokane Vallev Potentlal Annexation Areas
Policies
CFP Plan and coordinate the location of �ublic facilities and utilities in the aotential
annexation areas
CFP-12.2 Considering, in advance, proQerty acpuisition oaQOrtunities for future facilities
including but not limited to parks, police facilities, stormwater facilities,
areenbelts. open space. and street connectians
CFP-12.3 Coordinate with adjacent jurisdictions in develo�ina caqital improvement
croarams and studies addressinq multi-iurisdictional issues
4.4 Caaftal Facilities Plan
4.4.1 Introductfon
The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides an analysis of the facilities and services required to .
support the future land use and growth projected in the Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes a
six year capital projects and a financing plan for facilities provided by the City. The finance plan
identifies specific revenue sources that the City reasonably anticipates will be available in the year
the project is scheduled to be constructed. The CFP includes Level of Service (LOS) standards for
each public facility or service and requires that new development be served by adequate facilities.
The purpose of the CFP is to use sound fiscal policies to provide adequate public facilities
consistent with the land use element and concurre�t with, or prior to, the impacts of development.
4.4.2 Growth Assumption
On November 30, 2004, #he Spokane County Board of Commissioners approved Spokane Valley's
requested population allocation of 20,666 people. The allocation is the amount of people the City
can accommodate within its current boundary. Spokane Valley considers this an "interim"
allocation until wastewater treatment capacity issues are resotved. Because Spokane Valley did
not request an allocation outside of its City limits, facilities required to serve Urban Growth Areas
adjacent to the City are not analyzed in this plan. These areas are under the jurisdiction of
Spokane County; therefore, capital facilities planning activities within UGAs will continue to be the
County's responsibility.
The following population data is used for capital facilities planning purposes:
Tabl� 4.� Populaiton Proj�ctlon
I Year ��e2048 Z012 2025
I Populatlon 8b;n��88,920 92�243 103�676
4.4.3 Levet of Servlce
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facil�ties
Page 11 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehenslve Plan
� Cities are often defined by the quality of facilities and services that are provided to its residents.
Good road, sewer and water infrastructure are typical criteria used by businesses considering
relocatlon. Park and recreation facilities are increasingly used to judge the quality of a City.
Businesses want to locate where they can attract the best employees, and quality of life issues are
often the deciding factor for a person to move to a new area.
Level of service standards are quantifiable measures, such as acres of parks per 1000 people, or
the amourrt of time it takes to travel a road segment during peak moming and aftemoon "rush
hours,' the higher the level of service the higher the cost. This element establishes levels of
service which will be used to evaluate the adequacy and future cost of urban facilities and services.
4.4.4 Concurrency
The Growth Management Act introduces the concept of concurrency, which requires new
development to be served with adequate urban services at the time of development, or within a
specified tirne thereafter. The GMA allows six years for necessary transportation improvements to
be constructed as long as a financial commitment is made at the time of development. The GMA
strongly encourages concurrency for water and sewer, and it is good public policy to require the
same.
4.4.5 Financing Facilities and Services
The City is limited in its ability to finance all desired capital facility projects. Options must be
available for addressing funding shortfalls or decisions must be made to lower levels of service for
public facilities. In deciding how to address a particular shortfall, the City will need to balance
current needs versus future growth requirements; existing deficiencies versus future expansions.
Capital facilities plans must be balanced. When funding shortfalls occur, the following options
should be considered:
a. Increase revenues,
b. decrease level of service standards,
c. decrease the cost of the service or facility,
d. decrease the demand for the service or facility,
e. or some combination of the above.
The following table presents possible financial resources available to the City for capital projects.
Table 4 .a F�nar� R�ou�
Funding Cat�gory Funding Sou�ca
General Fund (Sales Tax, fees, property tax, utlliry tax, etc.)
Current Revenues Real Estate Exdse Tax (REE�
Impad Fees
Non-vated Generaf Obllgation
Voted General Obllga�on
Bonds Reve�ue (payable from a partJculer utllity or enterprise)
Lxal Impraveme�t D(strid (Assessmeni Bonds)
Surface Transportatlon Program
Bridge ReplacemeM Funds
Federal Grants Congestlon Mitigation and Ai� Quality Improv�eme� Program (CMAQ)
Lend and Water Cortservatlon Fund
Communtty Davelopment Block Grar�ts
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 12 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Table 4.5 Fundlnp R�scurcas
Fundin9 Catogory Funding Sourca
Aquatic LandS Enhancement Account (ALEA)
Transportatfon Improvement Account
Cerrtennial Clean Water Fund
Pubfic Wofks Tn�st Funds
State Grants/toans Interagency for Committee for Outdoor Recxeation (lAC)
Arterfa! Street Fund (Motor Fuel Tax)
Urban Arterlal Trust Aooaunt (UATA)
Aqua�c Lands Enhancement Account
Hazardous B�idge Repiacement
Developer Contribudons
Other ponations
Local Improvement Dlstricis
4.4.6 Impact Fees
New growth creates a demand for new and expanded public facilities and services. The GMA
authorizes local govemments to impose and collect impact fees to partialfy fund public facilities to
accommodate new growth. Impact fees can be used to pay for new or expanded facilities and
cannot be collected to address existing infrastructure deficiencies. The GMA allows impact fees to
be assessed on the following:
• Public Streets and Roads � Public Parfcs
• Schools • Open Space
• Fire Protection Facilities • Recreation Facilities
The City has not enacted impact fees as a funding mechanism for capital facilities, but may study
the issue as directed by future City policy.
4.4.7 Community Facilities
This section of the CFP includes civic buildings such as govemment offices, community centers,
and entertainment facilities. As a new City, Spokane Valley does not have a significant inventory of
community facilities.
Inventory of Existing Facilitles
Spokane Valley completed construction of CenterPlace at Mirabeau Point Park, in the summer,
2005. The facitity houses the Spokane Valley Senior Center, conference facilities, classrooms and
a"great room" for events. CenterPlace has a dining capacity of 400 and includes a full commercial
kitchen.
Spokane Valley leases office and meeting space for employees and City Council in the Redwood
Plaza office building, located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue. Spokane Valley also leases precinct
and court space at the Valley Precinct Building located 12710 East Sprague.
Level of Service
Spokane Valley does not propose to adopt a level of service standard for community facilities.
Forecast of Future Needs
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 13 of 58
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
� The need for new community facilities is difficult to quantify and depends on the future structure of
City govemment. If Spokane Valley continues to contract for senrices such as police, parks and
road maintenance, the need to acquire and maintain facilities will be minimal. However, if Spokane
Valley begins providing these services, there will be a corresponding need for administrative office
space and other facilities. For example, if Spokane Valley assumes responsibility for parks
maintenance, a new maintenance facility would have to be constructed to house equipment and
employees.
At some future point, Spokane Valley will likely purchase an existing building or construct a new
building to house City Hall. This decision must be made with thought and vision. In the right
location, City Hall will be the center for civic affairs and community events and will influence
economic development and the creation of a City Center. The location should be centralized and
accessible to all citizens.
Nearly three-quarters of the Cit�zen Survey respondents support using public money to help create
a City Center. Locating a civic building, such es City Hall, in the City Center would be a significant
catalyst to creating a distinct center and identity for Spokane Valley.
Locatlons and Capacides of Future Facilkles
Spokane Valley cumentiy has no specffic plans to construct new community facilities. The City
must decide the location of a permanent City Hall and/or other civic buildings. Future updates to
the Capital Facilities element will include information on locations and capacities for community
facilities.
Capltal Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley anticipates either constructing a new City Hall building, or purchasing and
remodeling an existing building within the six year time frame of this CFP. The following table
shows that Spokane Valley will use approximately �1,000,000 of Real Estate Excise Tax revenue
for Civic Buildings.
Table 4.8 Community Facilities Financing Plan
Pro}�t 2006 200T 2�08 2CQ8 2010 2011 201 Z Tohl
Civic Facllities � 563 550 750 1,300 3,163
' -L -- i
Total O 0 0 563 550 750 1,300 • 3,163
Revenue Sou�ce
Real Estate Excise Tax � 250 250 , 400 1 �0 1,Q00
� �
General Fund 313 , 300 ` 350 i 1,200 ; 2,163
� � ,
- — - � � � i
Total I 0 I 0 � Q � 563 � 550 750 � 1,300 � 3,163
4.4.8 Domestic Water
The City of Spokane Valley does not own or operate a public water supply system. Rather, water is
provided to Spokane Valley residences and businesses by special purpose districts, associations,
and public and private corporations. Water service is coordinated by Spokane County through the
Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP), which identifies service boundaries, establishes
minimum design standards and promotes the consolidation of regional water resource
management. The CWSP is updated as needed at the direction of the Board of County
Commissioners or the Washington State Department of Heatth (DOH).
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Cap�tal Facilities
Page 14 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
The City of Spokane Valley is supportive of existing regional water supply pianning, water use
efficiency programs and plans, watershed planning, wellhead protection plans, water quality plans,
and planning for reclamation and reuse. �; ��. •�
Water Systems � �
Water systems are categorized generally �
by the number of connections served;
Group A systems provide service to 15 or
more connections while Group B systems :=� ����
serve 2 to 14 connections. Spokane -
Valley has 25 Group A systems and 13 , �
Group B systems providing water service =--
within the City. A detailed inventory of -. �
water systems is shown below in the ;�-�" � �
inventory section.
Water System Plans
The Washington State Department of Health recommends that all water purveyors prepare a water
system plan to determine future needs for water facilities within their service areas. The plans must
include an existing facility inventory, project future needs for water supply, conservation strategies,
and identify and provide for the protection of aquifers against contaminates. Once a water system
plan is adopted, it must be updated every six years. The Departrnent of Health is the approval
authori#y for water system plens. Weter purveyors meeting the fo{lowing criteria ere required to
have water system plans approved by DOH.
1. Systems having 1000 or more connections.
2. Systems required to develop water system plans under the Public Water System
Coordination Act of 1977 (Chapter 70.116 RCV1�.
3. Any system experiencing problems related to planning, operation and/or management as
determined by the Depa�tment of Health.
4. All new systems.
5. Any expanding system.
6. Any system proposing to use the document submittal exception process in WAC 246-290-
125 (documents such as project reports and constructions drawings).
In 2003, the Washington State Legislation passed what is commonly referred to as the 'Municipal
Water Law" (MWL), amending sections of the State Board of Health Code (RCW 43.2�}; the laws
governing Public Water Systems (RCW70.119A); and sections of the state's Water Code (RCW
90.03). The MWL requires that water system planning documents must be consistent with
Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. The Department of Heatth is
developing procedures that water systems must follow to ensure coordination with local jurisdictions
and consistency with growth planning.
Water Rights
Washington State water law requires all prospective water uses to obtain a water right permit from
the Department of Ecology (DOE) before constructing a well or withdrawing any groundwater from
a well. However, the law does allow a water right permit exemption, referred to as the domestic
exemption, which states that no water right permit is required for the withdrawal of up to 5,000
gallons of water per day from a well when the water is being used for the following:
1. Livestock watering.
2. Single or group domestic water supply.
3. Industrial purposes.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 15 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
w 4. Irrigation of no more than one half acre of lawn or noncommercial garden (RCW
90.44.050).
For many years, Ecology issued water right certificates to water suppliers based on prujected future
use, rather than ectual "beneficial use." The unused portlons of those certificates or rights are
known as "inchoate" rights, which could potentially be taken away by Ecology if not put to beneficial
use.
This situation was troubling to municipal water suppliers. Public water systems need a level of
certainty to obtain financing for capital facilities as well as to issue letters of water availability to
development interests. The "Municipal Water Law: of 2003° clarified that cities are entitled to
inchoate (unused) water for the purpose of serving expanding areas. This ensures that
municipalities have sufficient water for anticipated growth based on the communities'
comprehensive plans and water and supply plans.
Watershed Planning
In 1998, Washington State passed the Watershed Management Act to develop a"thorough and
cooperetive method of detemnining what the current water resource situation is in each Water
Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) of the state and to provide local citizens with the maximum
possible input conceming their goals and objectives for water resource management and
development" (RCW 90.82.005). In late 1998, a Planning Unit was formed for WRIAs 55 and 57, or
the Middle Spokane-Little Spokane River watersheds, with Spokane County designated as the tead
agency.
The Watershed Management Act requires the Planning Unit to address water quantity issues and
allows water quality, habitat and in-stream flows to be considered in the process. The watershed
planning effort is expected to produce information on how water is used in the Water Resource
Inventory Areas and recommendations for how it should be used in the future.
The Planning Unit may also formulate a recommendation for in-stream flaws for the Spokane and
Little Spokane Rivers. The Department of Ecology may establish minimum water flows or levels for
streams, lakes or other public waters for the purpose of protecting fish, game, birds or other wildlife
resources, or recreational or aesthetic values of said public waters whenever it appears to be in the
pub{ic interest to do so.
The data, information and recommendations generated by the Planning Unit may be used by the
Department of Ecology to assess the ability to issue new water rights for the Spokane Valley-
Rathdn.im Prairie Aquifer. The WRIA 55 and 57 planning process will provide a basis for better
understanding of potential water resource limits and will be incorporated into future updates to this
capital facilities plan.
Inventory of Water Systems
Most of the water used by Spokane Valley residents and businesses is provided by water and
imgation districts and small water systems, listed in Tables 4.7 and 4.8 and shown on the Water
Districts and Wellheads map, located at the end of this chapter. The City of Spokane provides
water to the western portions of Spokane Valley, totaling approximately 620 connections. Group
A water systems are those which have 15 or more service connections or �egularly serve 25 or
more people fi0 or more days per year. Group B water systems serve two to 14 connections and
are not subject to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. Instead, they must meet state and local
requirements for water quality and operations.
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009�J Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 16 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tablo 4.7 SpoksrN Vatlay Wat�� Punnyora • Oroup A 8ysisms
Curront Resldentlal Cumant Non Rosidontial stO�a�
Oroup A Systams Connectio�a Conn�ctiorn Capactty
(osllons)
Bayou On Barker 0 4 0
Burger Rayal 4 - �-- - - 50
I
Gamhope IMgadon Distrid 7 � 455 0 0
Central Pre M'uc - Sullivan Rd 4 4 0
— - �
Cit�r Oi Spokane' 59700' 0 Not reported
Consofidated Irtig Dist 19 S�IStem 1 3063 51 ' 2,750,000
CoRSOlidated Irtig Dist 19 System 2 3663 141 2,200,000
East Spakane VVater Dist 1 1158 84 1,027,000
Hutchinson Irrigation Dist #16 790 0 1.200,000
Honeywell Electronlc Mfg LLC 0 1 0
Irvin Water Dlstrid #8 757 0 1,900,000
Ka(ser Alum - Trentwood Worica 0 2 21,200
Model iRigation Dist #18 2116 4 550,000
Modem Eiectric Weter Co 4302 ; 0 1,500,000
Orchard Avenue irrigation Dist 8 1186 0 0
i
Ptnecroft Moblle Home Park 143 ' 0 400
PuerCe Vallerte 0 1 0
Spitfl�e Pub And Eatery 0 2 87
Spokane Business & Ind�trial Pa�1c '— 0 � 237 478,000
Spokane Co - Mirabeau Park 0 2 200
Spokane Co Water Dlst #3 i 9788 426 6,880,000
Trerttw�ood Irrigation Dlstrtd 3 1470 0 1,120,000
__ '
Vera Water � Pow�er i 6652 i 0 8,650,000
Woodland Park Trafler Court 30 � 0 i 0
' Approximately 620 connections within Cliyr ot Spokene Valley
Source; Washinpt�n State DepartrneM ol Wealth
Tabfe 4.s Group B 8ystems
Oroup 8 Systertt Connectlo�s
Holiday Trailer Court 12
Janzen 8 Janzen 1
Levem)er Const. Water System 1
Mercer Trucicing Co Inc I 1
Middco Tool 8 Equipment 1
Systems Transport Inc 1
Td Water System 6
Tds -- -- 2
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-�7-2009� Chapter 4- Capitai Facilities
Page 17 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Unlon Padflc Raltroad - Trentwood i 1
Weatco S Apparel Senilce I 3
1Mestem Struc�ures Inc j 2
WSOT-Pinea Road Meintenance - - - 1
Source: Washington Stats DQpartment of Hoafth �
Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies were amended in 2004 to defer level of service standards for
water supply and fire flow to the requirements of the Department of Health and local fire codes
respectively.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Val{ey adopts by reference water system plans fo� all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Locations and Capackies of Future Facillties
Spokane Valley adopts by reference water system plans for all water purveyors providing service
within the City of Spokane Valley.
Capital ProJects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley adopts by reference capital project and financing plans for all water purveyors
providing service within the Cit�r of Spokane Valley.
Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Service
- Fire protection and emergency medical services
(EMS) are provided by Spokane Valley Fire �
Department (District No. 1) and Spokane County . i
Fire District No. 8. Spokane Valley Fire serves over -�
90% of the Valley, while District 8 serves a few
:
small areas in the southem part of the City (see Fire . j =
Districts Map at the end of this chapter). Both �'� �� -- ==-
dis tri c ts serve the Ci t y with a full ran ge of fire �� "
suppression and EMS services. Spokane Valley
voters chose to annex to Spokane Valley Fire and
District No. 6 in September, 2004.
Insurance Radng
City fire departments and fire protection districts are assigned a numerical fire protection rating by
the Washington Surveying and Ratings Bureau. Insurance companies fund the Bureau to perform
on-site inspections of fire districts to determine the rating. The Bureau analyzes five main areas:
average response time, water supply, communication network, schedule of fire inspections and fire
station evaluations (which focus on age of vehicles), personnel training and staffing of facilities.
Insurance companies use the fire protection rating to help determine insurance rates on all fire
insurance policies. The rating is on a scale of one to ten, with one representing the best score.
Quality of flre service can have a signficant impact on fire insurance rates, particularty for
commercial businesses. As of April, 2006, Spokane Valley Fire Department has a Fire Insurance
Rating of four and District No. 8 has a Rating of five, both indicating good fire protection.
Inve�tory of Existing Facilities and Apparatus
The Fire Districts Map shows the location of fire stations and service area boundaries for Spokane
Valley Fire, District No. 8 and surrounding fire protection districts. All fire agencies have mutual aid
agreements to assist each other in major emergencies.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 18 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Spokane Valley Fire 2006 apparatus inventory includes nine Class A engines, two Class A
pumper/ladders, two medic vehicles, three brush trucks and other miscellaneous vehicles for staff,
training, rescue, maintenance, prevention and command. Spokane Valley Fire has ten stations,
including eight within the City of Spokane Valley. Locations of the stations are as follows:
T�bi� 4.9 Spokan� Vall�y Flr�
Dlst�{ct SbUon Locatbns
Station 1' 10319 East Sprague
Station 2' `� 8007 East TreM
Statlon 3 2218 North Harvard
Station 4 22408 East Wellesley
StaUon 5' 15510 East Marlette
Station 6• ' 6306 East Sprague
Station 7' 1121 Soutfi Eve�green --
Staaon 8' North 2110 Wflbur
Station 9 East 11514 16''
Statfon 10" East 17217 Sprague
' Inslde Spokane Valley Cfty Umits
'• Medic-only station
Fire District No. 8 has one fire station inside the City limits, station 84 in the Ponderosa
neighborhood, located at 4410 South Bates. The District has two stations located outside the City
limits providing additional coverage, No. 81 at 6117 South Palouse Highway and No. 85 at 3324
South Linke Road. Stations 81 and 84 each have two Class A engines and two wildland brush
engines. Station 85 has one Class A engine and one wildland brush engine.
Level of Service
Spokane Valley Fire's Level of Senrice goals for response time are as follows:
• 5:00 minutes - 80% of the time for fire calls
• 5:00 minutes - 80°� of the time for Basic Life Support (BLS)
• 8:00 minutes - 80% of the time for Advanced Life Support (ALS)
Basic Life Support refers to a level of training that does not involve any advanced medical
procedures or administration of drugs. BLS providers can provide basic life saving and life
sustaining jnterventions while transporting a patient to a hospital. This is the foundation on which
all medical care is built. Good basic life support is key to survival of critically sick and injured
patients.
Advanced Life Support refers to a certain levet of care that may be provided to a patient by rescue
squad members, if necessary. Members trained in Advanced Life Support techniques are often
referred to as ALS providers. Among other procedures, ALS providers are able to administer certain
life-saving medications, perform advanced monitoring of heart rhythms, and are trained to perfoRn
advanced procedures to open and manage a patient's airway.
Average response times for fire calls the past 4 years are as follows:
• 2003 - 5 minutes 22 seconds
• 2002 - 5 minutes 27 seconds
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 19 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
• 2001 - 5 minutes 28 seconds
• 2000 - 5 minutes 35 seconds
The Distcict's historic response time data does not distinguish between types of calis. Future data
coliection will divide calls between fire, ALS and BLS.
Spokane Valley Fire has responded to an average 7,746 calls per year from 2000 to 2003. The
following table shows the number of calls per year.
Tab{e 4.10 Dtstri�t i Firo Responses
Yoar � 2000 2001 2002 Z003
Responses I 7594 , 7406 7821 � 8165
The Counfywide Planning Policies for Spokane County establishes minimum levels of service for
fire and emergency medical services as follows:
Urban a�eas are required to be serviced by a Fire District with at least a Class Six Insurance rating.
• Urban areas must be within five road miles of an operating fire station that provides service
with a'Class A' pumper, unless sUuctures are equipped with fire sprinklers.
• Urban areas shall be served by a state certified basic life support (BLS) agency within five
miles and an operating advanced life support unit within six miles or ten minutes response
time.
Both Fire District 1 and 8 meet the minimum countywide level of service standards.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley Fire has identified two areas within the City of Spokane Valley that need
improvement in response times and is planning to construct new stations to provide improved
service levels. The most urgent need is to provide better coverage to the south valley, and the
District is planning to move Station No. 9 to the vicinity of 32 Ave. and Pines Rd.
The northeast area of the City is underdeveloped at present but as the City grows over the next ten
to fifteen years, the District recognizes that a new station will need to be construc�ed to provide an
adequate level of service. The station will be constructed in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid.
Locations and Capacities of Future Fac(Ifties
Station No. 9 will be moved from its cument location at 11514 East 16�' to the vicinity of 32'� and
Pines. The station will include two bays and dorms for eight personnel. The District plans to
reconstruct Station No. 10 into a three bay facjlity with dorms for ten personnel. Station No. 11 will
be located in the vicinity of Barker and Euclid and will also be two bays with dorms for eight
personnel. Construction for Station 11 is tentatively planned for 2014 or 2015.
Capital ProJects and Flnancing Plan
Spokane Valley Fire Department is a junior taxing authority that supplements its regular taxes with
special levies. As the restrictions on the taxes generated from the regular tax go down, special
levies are proposed to maintain needed funding. Special levies must be approved by Fire District
voters. The Department does not use its bonding capacity to fund capital projects. The
Department's philosophy is to reserve funds generated through its regular revenues for future
capital needs. The following table represents the Valley Fire planned capital expenditures.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilit+es
Page 20 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tabi� 4.11 Spokarw Valtay Fire 6-yas� Capttal ProJocts and Financin� Plan
ProJ�ct 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 i Total
Fire Station No. 9
� �� i
� 31,000 i + I $1,800
(new construction)
Fire Statior� No. 10 � I - - . —
(reconstructlon) 31,800 $1,800
i
�
Total � � $1,000 $1,800 $2,800
i i
Note: Reserve funds fram regular districi taxes will fund capital ImprovemeMs.
(Amounts are times $1,000)
4.4.9 Library Service
Library services are provided by the Spokane County Library District. The District has a long
history of excellent service and upon incorporation, the Cit�r of Spokane Valley executed a one-year
contract with the District for continued service. After the initial year, Spokane Valley and the Library
District agreed to a five year contract for library seniices beginning in 2005. Eighty-seven percent
of voters approved annexing back into the District in a May 20Q5 special election, with the
annexation effective January 1, 2006.
Facility Planning
After incorporation, the Library District and the City of Spokane Valley collaborated on developing a
new capital facilities plan for the District. In March 2004, the capital facilities planning process
began and a sign�cant amount of information was gathered, including: ,
• Comparisons with library facilities in other similar sized Washington cities
• Spokane Valley demographics
• Public library facility standards
• An analysis of current Spokane Valley area libraries
• Pros and cons of various facility alternatives and
• Community research
Public Particlpation
The Library District and the City of Spokane Valley conducted a random sample survey of Spokane
Valley residents in March and April of 2004. The survey gathered information on local library use,
satisfaction with library services and preferences regarding future library services.
The District also conducted a community open house in May 2004, attended by 75 people, 75% of
which were City residents. Information was obtained on satisfaction with facilities and service,
facility improvement options, preferred library locations if a new main library were to replace the
cur�ent Valley Library, constructing either one or two new branches, and willingness to pay for new
libraries.
Research Conclusions
Analysis of information gathered leads to the conclusion that additional library space is needed to
serve Spokane Valley residents. It is also determined that expanding the current Valley Library isn't
a viable altemative. The community input showed a very high leve! (98%) of overall satisfaction
with library services and a high level of satisfaction with current facilities. The public identified two
areas needing improvement - materials availability, which requires a larger library, and public
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 21 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
- access computer availability. Only a modest interest in funding new facilities was expressed,
demonstrating a strong need for community education about future library facilities needs.
Communfty Survey
Spokane Valley's Community Preference Survey
included a question to gauge Spokane Valley
citizen's satisfaction with current Library services. �
The majority of survey respondents viewed library '.
services in a positive light, with 83°� af ,�'- �" �' `' ,
respondents reporting that library services were I. � ,ri��� � :- ' � � — - - _ �-
good, very good or excellent. �'�s `
� � T, ,
• � � � •. � ,,.-_- �
Inventory of Existlng Facilitles � . . , . ; �
Spokane Valley has one library located inside its
boundary, the District's Valley Branch, located at 12004 East Main. This resource library is the
District's largest facility, measuring 22,100 square feet, including administrative space. The District
has two other libraries within the greater Valley area located at 4322 North Argonne and 22324
East Wellesley in Otis Orchards.
As of May 2004, 35,544 Spokane Valley residents were Libra District cardholders. Valley Library
was the primary branch of registration, with Argonne v ���
second and Otis Orchards third. Spokane County
Library District has a reciprocal library card agreement
with the City of Spokane with over 1,500 Spokane E�re�dwsyAv
Valley residents owning a Spokane public library card. v�wr e�
i w
Level of Serv(ce s � g �
. The Spokane County Library District has not �
� � i 1Gf� Av
established a level of service. �,
Forecast of Future Needs
The District uses a target Spokane Valley population of 105,000 for its future projections, which is
consistent with the City of Spokane Valley's population allocation for growth within the existing City
limits. The District recognizes that a new library needs to be built inside Spokane Valley to provide
adequate (ibrary services. Future facilities will be divided between a main branch and a future
neighborhood branch.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
The main branch should measure about 49,000 square feet to adequately serve a population of
84,000 people. The main b�anch should be located on an arterial street within about one mile
of the Sprague corridor between Dartmouth and Sullivan Roads. A neighborhood branch of
approximately 15,000 square feet serving a population of 20,000 would ideally be located within two
to three miles of the main branch.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The future main branch is estimated to cost $11.4 million in 2004 dollers; the neighborhood branch
would cost about $3.6 million. Voter-approved general obligation bonds are the normal financing
method for library projects of this size.
The District proposes the following capital improvement schedule:
1 to 5 years
• Determine preferred locations for new libraries.
• Develop funding plan.
• Purchase land for libraries.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 22 of 58
City of Spokana Valley Comprehensive Plan
5 to 10 years
• Secure funding and purchase site(s) if not already done.
• Construct new main branch.
• Sell existing Valley branch.
10 to 20 years
• Secure funding and construct neighborhood branch.
Table 4.12 Spoksn� County Library District s!x yaar Capfbl ProJQCts and Financing Ptan
Proj�ct � 2006 2007 2008 2009 Z010 Z011 � 2012 Total
New Spokane Val{ey ���� S150 S1,700 $8,340 $6,750 0 0 519,000
Ubrary
�
Total � 5100 a150 � 51,700 58,300 � 58,750 � 0 0 � 519,000
i
Rsv�nw Sourc�s ' � ,
. ,
GO Bonds $10� S150 S1,700 S8,500 S8,750 0 0 � 19000
�
Totel i s100 s150 =1,700 :8,500 S8 i 0 � 0 � 19000
�
Note: The majoriry oi General Fund expenses incurred In 2006 and 2007 are reimbursabte from voter-approved bond funds.
The Library District will continue to work with the City of Spokane Valley to further develop plans to
construct new libraries. As plans are updated and refined, this Capital Facilities Plan will be
amended to incorporate future changes.
Operationat Costs �
The Library District assumes that with efficient building design and continuing staff productivity �
improvements, a larger Valley Library and an eventual new branch can be operated at normal
District funding levels of 50 cents per a1,000 of assessed valuation.
4.4.10 Parks and Recreatlon
Spokene Valley has a wide range of , _
recreational opportunities available to residents . .- ' ; ,� _ ' ^ �
and visitors. City parks, school play fields, goif •. ,� :�.. � �, � '� � '�: `. ?=.
courses, trails, County parks and conservations ` ��' ';��-�
..
areas are all within close vicinity to Spokane ,� � �- '��';.: �
Valley residents. � � - � � ='t,� ' �
�� �' ' ``� - ��� - ;
The City provides a system of local parics that is � ;: �- .� :_�
managed by the Spokane Valley Parks and �= ' � �+ � - � , � ,� . ~
- �-
Recreation Department. The Parks Department
_��
is in the process of developing a new Parks, -� - -_ -
Recreation, and Open Spaces Master Plan. —
When finished, this plan will offer a detailed
picture of the park, recreation and open space
system, including changes and improvements _
that will be made in the future. "
This section of the Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) provides summaries of the parics inventory, level of
service (LOS), future park needs, proposed projects, and a financing plan for the next six years.
Park Types
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 23 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Parks are classified by their size, service area and function. Spokane Valley uses the nationally
recognized Park, Recr�ation, Open Space arrd Greenway Guidelines, to establish standard for
parks planning. Major classifications include mini-park, neighborhood, school-park, community,
large urban, various trail designations and special use facifities. The Parks Element, Chapter 9,
provides a thorough description of park types used for planning purposes.
Inventory of Ex�sting Facllitles
The Parks Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows the location of all parks within Spokane
Valley. Table 4.13 provides an inventory of park and recreation facilities owned by Spokane Valley.
These parks are used to calculate Spokane Valley's level of service for partcs. The Parks Master
Plan provides the most detailed inventory of parlcs, including equipment, struc#ures and other
miscellaneous park facilities.
Tabla 4.13 5poicsn� Vatley Park Facllltiss
Spokatw Valloy Parfu Acrea�e Ststus
Neighborhood Parks
Balfour Park - - --- --- — - - 2.88 Developed - -
Browms Perk - - . _ _. _ — - -� ----- . 8.03 Developed
Castie Park � 2.71 Mlnimally Developed
Edgediff Partt 4.74 Developed
TeRace Vfew Park ' 9.2� � Qeve�oped
Subtotal 2T.68
Community Parks _ - �-- - - --- --
Valley Mlasion Park � 21.91 Develaped
f Subtotal 21.91
Lat�pe Urban Psrics - -- - - - -- -
Mlrabeau PoIM Park i 41.91 Devdoped
8ubtotal ' 41.91
3pecial Use Ares�s — - - - - - -- - -
i
Park Road Pool I 2.00 Develaped
Su111van Par1c --- -- 18.07 Developed
Valley Senlof Center � ^ � 2.09 Developed
CenterPlace - 13.80 Developed
8ubtotal ' 33.78 I
Undeveloped Paric Land -- ---- - - - -
My►tie PoIM Park �� 31.07 Uncieveloped
Valley Mtsslon Park (South) -- ^�__ - T.22 Undeveloped
3ubtota! 38.28 '
Total Park Acres 163.46
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 24 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Level of Servlce
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires all jurisdictions to adopt a level of
service (LOS) standard for parics. Spokane
Valley has the flexibility and freedom to adopt a °'
LOS standard for parks that reflects the ,� �v�'
expressed need and desire of our community. � '-�=� `;
._ . , : ..
The National Recreation and Parks Association � ��y-�'
suggest that cities adopt LOS standards for
different park types, such as mini (pocket), '
neighborhood, community and major parks.
Spokane Valley does not have a well-developed �' � ' ,� - �
, :� �
park system and will use total City-owned park �
�, -,_� .
acres for its LOS measurement. ��Y''
Spokane Valley currently owns 163 acres of �-„ _.�r,�:;�,�2 ��- `��=
develo ed and undevelo ed arfc land. Usin the t` "�'- i �,. "�� .
, >
2006 population of 85,010 people, the c urent ����_'`���� _`�
parks LOS is 1.92 acres of City park land for
every 1000 residents. Spokane Valley adopts 1.92 acres/1000 people as its minimum LOS
standard for parlcs, as shown is Table
Tabl� 4.14 3pokana Valley Partcs L�val of SKVIc� 4.14.
Spokane Velley reoognizes that
cfti-owrwd schools, churches, natural areas and
200� Poputatbn P � �� � ot servtc� commercial enterprises all provide
recreation opportunities for Spokane
Valley residents. These will all be
ss,o�o 183 �.92 acxes��000 taken into consideration when �
Spokane Valley determines the best
location to purchase new park land.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley has the capacity to accommodate 20,666 people over the next 20 years within the
current City limits. In order to maintain the current LOS of 1.92 acres11000 people, Spokane Valley
would have to add about 40 acres of park land over the next 20 years, with 12 acres in the first six
years, as shown in Table 4.15. The Parks Master Plan provides a more detailed analysis of park
and recreation needs by dividing the City into smaller service areas.
Tab{Q 4.1a Future Puk Oema�d
Ysar Popu{adon Total Park Acros Acros Roqulrod at 1.92 Nat Ooflcl�ncy Acres
Avallablo •cresh 000
2006 85,010 163 163 0
2012 92,243 163 -. 177 � -14
i
2025 105,676 183 203 -40
•Aasumes 20-year gro�h ot 20,668 people
Locatlons and Capacftles of Future Facilitles
In order to maintain the adopted 1.92 acres/1000 level of service standard, Spokane Valley must
add 12 acres of park land by the year 2011. In order to address this deficiency, Spokane Valley will
purchase 20 acres of park land within the six year time frame of this Capital Facilities Plan, resulting
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 25 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
in surplus of eight acres as shown in Tab1e 4.16. The Master Plan will be used to determine the
best locations for park land acquisitions.
Tabia 4.15 Pirics Capsctty Matysb
Ysar Poput�tian Total Puk Acns Acns Rsquir�d at 1.92 N � �� A �
Availabl� scres�1000
2006 85,010 163 � 163 —( 0
2012 92,243 183' 177 6
e
'20 acres of parkla�d witl be purchased wfthin flrst 6 y�ea�s of plan
Capltal Projects and Financing Plan
The following table details Spokane Valley's six year Parks and Recreation capital improvement
financing plan. The table details projects that address level of service deficiencies (capacity
projects) and other capital improvements (non-capacity) projects.
Tabl� 4.17 Parlcs Capital Faclltties Plan
No�a: Amounb In 51�000
Projoct 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total
Park Land Acqulsitlon (20 � �� $1,000
Acres Capacity) � I
� -�-- -� - � - ; -
Paric Improvements 300 950 500 500 580 � 100 � 200 $3,130
- •-- - - -- --
� SMmmtng Pod Upgrades 1,600 � I I 51,600 �
Total -- -- -- — 1.300 2,550 ' 500 -� 500 580 100 200 � �5,730
Revenue Sour+ca
General Fund 1,300 300 �1,600
� � I I �
— - � - -; -
REET�1 ' `�`'� - �-- -- 400 � 400 � 100 � 200 $1,950
-- - - - - _ . I ! - --- — �
G �� , 200 100 100 180 J 5580
� - �—
-- - i 1,BQQ ' I $1,600
Spokane Courtty � i '
� i � —. ,
Total I 1,300 � 2,550 � 500 � 500 580 � 100 200 $5,730
�
4.4.11 Public Safety
The Spokane Valley Police Department is a contract law enforcement agency, partnering with the
Spokane County Sheriffs Department to provide a safe environment for the citizens, businesses,
and visitors of the City of Spokane Valley. This unique contracting relationship allows for the
sharing of many of our resources, allowing both agencies to operate at peak efficiency without
duplicating services.
Spokane Valley also contracts with Spokane County for judicial, jail and animal control services.
The total contract for public safety for 2006 totaled over $16 million, including approximately 100
- � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter4 - Capital Facilities
Page 26 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
commissioned police officers.
Spokane Valley supports community oriented policing and recognizes it as an important
complement to traditional law enforcement. In Spokane County, community policing is known as
S.C.O.P.E., or Sheriff Community Oriented Policing Effort. The community policing model balances
reactive responses to calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of
crime and disorder. Community policing requires police and citi�ens to join together as partners in
the course of both identifying and effectively addressing these issues. About 364 Spokane Valley
citizens are S.C.O.P.E volunteers.
Community Survey
The Community Preference Survey included questions to gauge the public's perception of police
services. Results show that 85% of Spokane Valley residents believe police services are good,
very good, or excellent, indicating a generally high level of confidence in the police force. Only 27%
of respondents expressed a willingness to pay additional taxes to have improved police services.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The Spokane Valley Police Precinct is located at 12710 E. Sprague and houses patrol and
detective divisions, the traffic unit and administrative staff. The Precinct also includes a property
storage facility and a Spokane County District Court.
Spokane Valley is served by five S.C.O.P.E. stations, shown in the following table.
Tabl� 4,.1 a 8pokan� Valky 3.C.O.P.E statlo�s
Natghborhood Locatlon Noighborhood Locatbn
V�dest Valley 3102 North Argonne Trenhvood 2400 N. Wllbur # 79
Universfty i 10621 East 15 Central Valley � 115 N. Evergreen Rd.
Edgedfff 522 S. Thierman Rd. East ; 4903 N. Harvard #3 '
Level of Servlce
Public safety is a priority for the City of Spokane Valley. It is difficult to determine at this time, an
adequate and measurable level of police protection. Spokane Valley will monitor the perforrnance
of the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and will adjust the contract for services as necessary
to ensure an adequate level of police protection.
Forecast of Future Needs
Future needs for police protection will be determined as a part of the annual budget process.
Locatlons and Capacities of Future Facilities
Spokane Valley is not p{anning to construct any new (aw enforcement facilities at this time.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Spokane Valley is not planning to construct any new law enforcement facilities at this time.
4.4.12 School Facllitles
Four public school districts provide service within Spokane Valley: East Valley, West Valley,
Central Valley and Spokane School District 81. Spokane Valley must coordinate with each district
to ensure consistency between the City's plan and school districts' plans. There are also a number
of private schools that provide service to Spokane Valley area chi(dren.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
The School District Map, found at the end of this Chapter, shows district boundaries and locations
of all public schools within Spokane Valley. Tables 4.19 through 4.21 shows capacities of all
schools located within Spokane Valley.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capita) Facilities -
Page 27 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
School districts use portable classrooms at some school sites as interim measures to house
students until permanent facilities can be built. Portable units are not included in capacity figures.
School capacity figures are reported by the Washington State Superintendent of Public tnstruction
and are based on square footage per student.
TabN 4.19 C�Mrsl Valley 8chool lmrsrttory
ElamaMary School Sq. FL Araa Capsclty
Adams ' 46,879 521
----- Summit (Formerty Blake) 34,823 � 436
g��y�y 40,648 499
Chester 38,388 480
Greenacres 55,875 ' 880
Keystone 33,669 421
�ny �ke 60,477 756
i
McOonald � 46,504 ' S63
�
Opport�mity 42,388 521
Ponde�osa 51,377 642
� - -- - -
prog�� � 37.573 ; 452
Soulfi Pines -- ----- I 45.956 499
Sunrfsse 53,673 - - ' 882
Unhrersfty 37,867 455
' � Total E/emerrtary Permaneni Facllftles 626,097 ' 7,587
� Junlor HIQh Schools Sq. Ft Are� Capscity
�
Bowdlsh 74,738 I 743
Evergreen -- - -- 76,075 � 751
Greenacxes ' 91,803 -' - - -- - 908
Hortzon 84,795 —� 838
�
North Pines - - -� - -- - 105,368 i --- - — 1.044 -
Total Junia Higi� Permanenf Fac!lides i 432, 779 4, 284
3inior Hl�h Schoofs aq. �� � ap�Y
Central Valley 239.540 1,988
University f -- - I 239,540 1,988
Tota! Sentor Hl�h Fsc!lt�bs I 479, 080 3, 974
Source: Central Valley Sc�ool Olstrict
TabN 4.20 East Valioy Scl�ool Imrentory
Elfinentsry 8chool &q. FL Area Capacfty
East Farms 47,047 579
OUs Ordiards i - 51,789 829
Skyview � 42,140 i 509
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009,� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 28 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
Tablv 4.20 E�ast Vall�y School Invarttory
ElomaMary School Sq. Ft Aroa Capsclty
Trent 58,482 713
TreMwood - -- � - - --- ------ 47,274 ` 573
I
Total E/ementsry PermarKrrt Facilities 246, 732 I 3, 003
i
Junior High Schools ' Sq. FL Ma ' Capecfty
East Valley � �,�� 8 3 1
Mountain Vfew - --- -- - -- - -- - - -- 82,544 816
Total Junlor HJgh Permanent Facilities 167,10b 1, 647
Senlo� Higfi Schoob Sq. FL Ana Capsctty
i
East Valley I 203,248 1,886
Tota! Sentor Hlgh Facf!lties 203, 248 i 1, 688
Source: Washi�ton State Supe�ir�tendent of Public Instruction
Tabi� �.Z1 Wast Vall�y School l�v�ntory
Elementary 3chool 3q. F� Area Capacity
Mfllwood Earty Childhood Ctr. 27,184 ' 340
- - - -- ---- � -
Ness 33,440 � 418
Orchard Ceriter - �- -- ---� 34,094 42fi
Pasedena Park �— - - ---- ----- 34,002 - � -- 425 �
Seth Woodward 35,941 - j- 449
Tota! Elemer>tary Permanent FecNit/es ^ 164,641 2,058
�ddl� Sthoob Sq. FL Arp Capscity
Centennfal 89,870 ' 875
West Valiey City School 30,258 307
TotaJ Junlor H1gh Permanenf FaciilGes 120, t 28 J,182
�
Senlw High 8choob ' 3q. Ft Area CapsCky
West Valley 149.128 ' 1, 207
- - Spokane Valtey - - - - ---� ---- --- -- 13,902 i 118
Tota! Senior High Facilifies i 63, 030 1, 323
3ource: West Valley School District
Level of Servlce
The Countywide Planning Policies for Spokane County requires that all jurisdictions adopt a Level
of Service standard for schools. Spokane Valley defers this responsibility to the individual school
districts providing service within the City. Individual school districts may request that Spokane
Valley adopt a Level of Service standard in future updates to the Capital Facilities Element.
� Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 01-07-20�� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 29 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Forecast of Future Needs
Central Valley School District
The Centra) Valley School District (CVSD) is experiencing a period of high growth in student
population, particulariy towards its eastern boundary. Liberty Lake and Greenacres E(ementary
Schools are currently over capacity. In response to this growth, the District initiated its'Community
Linkages" planning process in the fall of 2004 to develop strategies and alternatives for
accommodating its present and future students.
The committee developed student population projections through the 2008/2009 school year for the
entire district by anatyzing growth trends in student population, building permit activity and
proposed housing developments. The data wilt be used to guide decisions on where to locate
school facilities. Table 4.23 shows the number of students enrolled in Central Valley Schools in
2005 for each school in the District and projections through the 200&09 school year. In 2005,
11,480 students were enrolled in CVSD schools, with 9,363 of those students living within the City
of Spokane Valley.
Tsbl� 4.23 Clntral Vatl�y EnrollmaM ProJectlon
Studant Naw Prototted Stud�rrt gWdent
School Attendancs Ares Enrollrttartt 2005 Enrollment tn
2008-Z009 IncroasQ
E/emontsry Schools
Broadway - - - - I - - 492 � -- - - 517 25
Progress 291 311 - - -- - - -- 20 -
Qpportunity 339 366 71
Adams 466 503 - -- - - 3T -
Univefsity 419 435 - - 16
South Plnes f 331� ' 332 1 -
McDonald - -� - - - -- -- 358 - - - - 3g4 - 8 --
Sunrfse - - - - 490 - - 532 - - 42
Ponderoaa ' 334 '� 337 3
Chester 322 � 352 � 30
Gree�acxea 588 686 98
l.lberty Leke - 727 ' - - - — - 878 149
Total 5155 � 5611 I 458
� - ----
Mlddle Schools I
I. e�-- ` -
Narth Plnea --- - j 525 � 551 28
Bowdlsh � b74 ' S89 15
Horizon ---- 440 I 482 22 -
Evergreert - - - -- - - — 578 - -- 630 - � -
Gt�eenat�s •- - - 644 I 757 - - � _ 113
Total 2761 I 2989 I 228
High Schools - - - - - -
Unfveratty Hlgh _ _ 1922 -- - - - 2055 � - -- --- - - - -- -- 133 -
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q'�-Q7-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 30 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Cerrtral Valley H)gh ' 1642 1804 162
Total 3564 3859 295
Total StudeM Enrolimern 11,480 12,459 � 979
Souroe: Central Velley Linkages Committee - John Bottelfi, Spokane County GIS
The following table shows enroliment projections for Central Valley School District from the
Washington State Superintendent of Public Instruction. The table provides historic and projected
school enrolirnents for the years 2001 through 2010.
Tab{e 4.24 Gntral Valley 3thool Enrolfinent
Actual E�ro11meM ProJected Enroilment
Orade 200! 2002 2003 2004 2006 20Q6 2007 2008 2009 2U10
K- 6 5,873 5,817 5,9fi5 6,2T2 8,433 6,686 6.980 7,332 7,697 7,985
7- 8 1,800 1,823 1.819 1.817 1.899 1,542 1,900 1,897 1,926 I 2,090
9-12 3,410 3,544 3,555 3,602 3,653 3,695 3,788 3,789 3,828 � 3,862
K-12 11,083 11.184 11,339 11,691 11, 985 12,323 12,688 13,018 13,451 13,937
Sourcs: Washington State Superintendent of Public instruction
East Vallev School District
East Valley School District has experienced a significant decline in enrollment in recent years. In
1999, enrollment peaked at just under 4,700 students down to 4,355 students enrolled in the fall of
2004. The following table indicates that East Valley will continue to lose students through the year
2010. -
�
Tabto 4.25 East Va!!ey 3chool Enrollmern -
A�tua! E�rollmaM I Projoct�d Enroltment
Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 200T 2008 2009 2010
K- 6 2.355 2,288 2,to7 2,139 2,082 2,022 ' 1,974 1,964 � 1,931 � 1,917
7-8 743 735 732 716 690 � 681 659 , 589 572 � 564
9-12 1,592 1,565 1,544 1,500 1,396 1,354 1,322 1,337 1,292 1,217
K-12 4,690 4,588 4,443 4,355 4,168 I 4,057 3,955 3,900 3,795 3,698
;
Soume: Washington State Superintendent ai Public Instruction
East Valley Schoo) District estimates that out of 4,240 total students enrolled in the District in
September, 2005, 2,378 lived within the City of Spokane Valley.
West Vallev School District
West Valley Sch�l District has grown in student population consistently since 1998 and is
projected to continuing growing through the year 2010, as shown in Table 4.25.
Tabl� 4.28 Wast Valiey 3chool Enrollment
Actual EnroNrtwr�t Projactad Enrotlment
Grade 2001 2002 2003 2044 20U5 2006 ' 2007 2008 2009 2010
K- 6 1,591 1,552 1,614 1,581 1,605 1,610 1,632 1,710 1,728 1,T50
7-8 545 568 575 528 542 I 560 � 587 -- 503 519 569
- �
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009J Chapter 4- Capital Facilities ._
Page 31 of 58
City of Spokane Valiey Comprehensive Plan
Tabio 4.26 Wost Val�ey School EnrollmeM
Actual Enroliment Projacbd EnrotlmMt
9-12 1.469 1,502 1,503 1,534 1,510 1,538 1,554 1,559 � 1,576 1.493
K-12 3,605 3,620 3,692 3,643 3,657 3,708 3,753 3,772 i 3,8Z3 , 3,832
Source: Washington Staie Superintende�t of Public Instructlon
Locations and Capacities of Future Facilities
Central Vallev School District
The most urgent need for the CVSD is to add more elementary classroom space in the east end of
the District. The District recently acquired two properties in the north Greenacres area for a new
elementary school. The District will need to construct a new high school and middle school in the
20•year time frame of this comprehensive plan. The district has a site for a middle school adjacent
to the Liberty Lake Elementary School. A number of elementary schools need to be completely
remodeled, including Opportunity, Greenacres and Ponderosa.
East Vallev School District
East Valley is not planning to construct any new facilities within the six year time frame of this
capital facilities plan. Future updates to this plan will incorporate new capital projects.
West Vallev School District
West Valley is remodeling its High School and will add elementary school classroom space.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
West Valley School District passed a$35 million bond measure in 2004 that is being used to
remodel West Valley High School, construct new elementary school classrooms and a new
gymnasium.
Central Valley School District is in the process of developing a Capital Improvement and Financing
Plan.
4.4.13 Sewer Service
Background
In 1983, Spokane County initiated an ambitious program to bring sewers to houses and businesses
located in the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). Since that time, over 17,000 residences and
businesses in the greater Spokane Valley area have been connected to the County's sewer
system. Spokane County has invested nearly $200 million in sewer construction countywide to
date. Continued sewer construction in Spokane Valley will cost another $74 million through the
year 2010 when the County's Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP) is compleied. This figure
does not include costs for a new wastewater treatment plant, which is discussed later in this
section.
Upon Incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley entered into an interlocal agreement giving
Spokane County lead agency authority to provide sewer service. At this time, Spokane County and
Spokane Valley elected officials are exploring the options for the possible assumption of the Valley
sewer system. However, no decisions have been made regarding the transfer of responsibility and
ownership of Valley sewers. This section of the Capital Facilities Plan assumes that Spokane
County will continue to own and operate the sewers in Spokane Valley. The CFP will be updated
as necessary to incorporate future changes.
Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan
In 1996, the County adopted an Interim Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (CWMP).
The intent of the CWMP was to develop strategies to expedite the sewer program for protection of
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facil�ies
Page 32 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
the Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the Washington State Departments of Heafth \
(DOH) and Ecology (DOE) and the Spokane County Heafth District. �-
In 2001, Spokane County updated the CWMP, which focused on redefining priority sewer areas
and conforming to requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA). Most sign�cantty, the
CWMP updated population and wastewater flow forecasts and produced a revised Capital
Improvement Program (CIP).
Wastewater Facilkies Plan
Along with the CWMP, Spokane County adopted a Wastewater Facilities Plan (WFP) in 2001 that
identified wastewater facilities and programs required to meet the long-term sewer needs of the
County. The WFP focuses on developing a long-term wastewater management strategy for the
County. The WFP provides an in-depth analysis of various wastewater treatment technologies
available, in addition to e�cploring the wide range of related environmental considerations. Public
participation was fully integrated into this e�ensive planning effort.
Wastewater Treatment
Wastewater is conveyed through Spokane County's sewer system to the City of Spokane Riverside
Park Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for treatment and discharge into the Spokane River. In
1982, Spokane County and the City of Spokane signed an interiocal agreement wherein the County
purchased ten million gallons per day (mgd) of capacity in the RPWRF. Spokane County is
currently using nearly eight mgd of its contracted capacity. A key component of the WFP is to
develop a new Spokane County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWfP) to serve
wastewater generated in the greater Spokane Valley region.
The WFP explores the following treaiment altematives:
• Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Spokane River, using one or more new
treatment plants between Liberty Lake and the City of Spokane.
• Discharge of treated wastewater effluent to the Little Spokane River, providing flow
augmentation in the Little Spokane River to help meet minimum stream flow needs.
• Use of treated and reclaimed wastewater for irrigation of agricultural lands, golf courses,
school grounds and parks.
• Use of treated and reclaimed wastewater for creation of wetlands.
• Underground storage of treated and reclaimed wastewater for subsequent use for irrigation
or release to streams for flow augmentation during critical low-flow periods.
• Recharge of the Spokane Aquifer with treated wastewater effluent, with the co-mingled
water being avai�able for all uses including potable water supplies.
• Discharge of wastewater to the Liberty Lake treatment plant for treatment and subsequent
discharge to the Spokane River.
In June 2004, Spokane County amended its WFP to provide supplemental information related to
water quality of the Spokane River, additional site-specific detail for the proposed treatment plant
location and a report on the progress of key implementation activities.
Site Selection
During the development of the WFP, prior to Spokane Valley's incorporation, Spokane County
engaged in an intensive public participation program to determine the most appropriate location for
a new wastewater treatment plant. It was determined that the ideal location would be on the
westem end of the Valley within close proximity to the Spokane River and large enough to allow for
future plant expansions (15 to 20 acres in size).
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 33 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Spokane County solicited nominations from the public and reviewed its land use database to
- identify potential parcels. Fifteen sites were initially identified and subjected to a thorough
screening process. The sites were evaluated by a technical committee consisting of civil engineers,
biologists, geo-engineers and land use planners. The selection process was monitored by a citizen
focus group and included three public hearings to ensure continuous public participation.
At the end of the process, two sites, Alki/Fancher (close to the Fairgrounds) and the old Stockyards
site (on Maricet Street in the City of Spokane), were selected for fu�ther environmental review. A
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) was prepared to evaluate the potential
environmental impacts on each site and conveyance routes for raw sewage and treated effluent.
However, it was determined that the AlkilFancher site could not be secured in time for site
development. Therefore, the Playfair Race Track site was selected for further environmental
evaluation.
After thorough review, and two more public hearings in early 2004, the Stockyards sit2 was chosen
as the preferred site to locate a new treatment plant. It has not been determined if the new
treatment plant will be constructed, owned and operated by Spokane County, the City of Spokane
Valley, or by a special purpose govemmental body.
Inventory of Existing Facilities
Sewer facilities within Spokane Valley are a system of pipes and pumping stations that move
untreated sewage to the City of Spokane Riverside Paric Water Reclamation Facility (RPWRF).
The folfowing tables provide an inventory of sewer facilities in the Valley.
Table �.27 Spokane Valley Pump 3tatlons
3tatbn P� Horsapow�r Stand-by Povwr P Capaclty (9Pm)
� �
Ella 3 89 � Yes No 2,600
Midilome � 2 - - 5 � - No Yes 185
� -- - - -
Ml�abeau �i 2 I 10 Yes No 280
' � � — ---- � — —
Rldgemont 2 5 ; Yes Yes 150
Rlvervvalk I 2 15 Yes No 300
Sprague i 2 I 10 Na _ _— No -- -- 920
9pm = gallons per minute Source: Spokane County Utiliiies Department
Taba � .ZB Spoka� Vallay Interc.optors Level of Service
3tand capectty The Regional Minimum Level of Service Standards state
�"�� powar �pd� that incorporated areas will be provided with wastewater
sauct, va�iey , No ; 3o,eoo,000 collection and transport systems in accordance with the
, adopted sewer concurrency requirements of the
- rvortn vaney � rvo �0,�50,00o jurisdiction. Spokane Valley requires all new
gpd • gaiia,a � dey sou�ce: spoMcane development to be served with public sewer. Only
county uts. �ept. existing residential, commercial and industrial lots may be
served by septic systems/drain fields (approved by the
Spokane County Heafth District) and only if public sewer is unavailable.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane County currently has about 26,223 customers within its sewer system area. Since some
customers generate more flow than others, it is common to define an Equivalent Residential Unit
_ (ERU) as a way to project future flows and to set the cost se�wer service rates. Spokane County
_ � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �,-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 34 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comp�ehensive Plan
figures an ERU to be 900 cubic feet of water per month, or about 225 gallons per day. The 26,223
customers account for 38,831 ERUs. �-
Table 4.28 Spokano Vap�y Saw�r Lines and Manhol�s
(3ravtty Mains Total LanQth (iq
6' 1,282
8` 1,117,747
10" 125,782
12' 52,763
15° 39.620
18' 34,137
21' 14,603
24" 29,885
27' 12,585
30" 14,782
36" 18,807
42" 20,938
48' 11,0$8
54" 16.544 -
Total Lon�th 1,510�763 R � 286 mi
Manhale Covers 5,695
Source: Spokane County UUllties Departrnent
The following table shows that Spokane Valley accounts for 28,396 ERUs, or 73% of the County's
total ERUs.
Tabl� 4.30 Spokane County 3awsr Custom�rs and ERUs
Customor Typa City ot Spokane Valley Aroas Remaining County Totat fa� Counry
val�ey ouesld• ot chy s4rvrce Areas sarvic• Aross
Accounts ERUs Accounts ERUs Accounts , ERUs Accounts ERUs
Single Fam(ly , 15,960 16.353 1,924 1,937 6,329 i 6,414 24,213 24,704
�
Multl-Family -- 37T � 5,Od3 -- -- 88 137 127 S48 592 � 8,128
CommerGel � 1 1,217 i 6,827 8 30 I 186 969 .- 1 7,826
,
Mobfie Home Parks 9 I 173 0� 0 0 0 - 9' 173
TOTAL 17,663 28,396 � Z,018 2�104 I 6,642 8�331 Z6�223 i 38,831
Souroe: Spokane County Utilitles Department
The most urgent need for the Spokane region is to increase the capacity to treat wastewater.
Spokane County adopted a new policy in 2005 making connection to the sewer system voluntary
for new sewer construction areas as a part of the Septic Tank Elimination Program (STEP). The
County estimates that 50% of the parcels within the STEP area will connect voluntarily in the year
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _
Page 35 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
f�ollowing sewer construc#ion. Table 4.31 shows the County's historic and projected total
- connections to the sewer system through the year 2010.
T�bt� 4.51 Co�n�ctlons to County Swv�r
S�ptic Tank New Total
Yesr
Eqminatbn Constructfon ConcNWor�s
2002 1,490 609 2,099
— 2003 ' 1,407 - - - � - 565 ' 1,972
2004 1.573 474 2.047
-- 2005 j 1,230 i -- 682 1,912 --
Z006 , - 596 - — — --- 585 , ,, 8,
2007 i --- 843 585 -- 1.228
2008 g� � 1,139
�2009 781 - - - 585 - - - --- 1,366 - - -
2010 ` 691 - — — — - ' - 585 i 1,276
i i
A two percent annual growth rate is used to project the amount of sewer flow that new construction
wili add to the system. Using these assumptions, the County expects to reach its contracted ten
mgd capacity at the City of Spokane Reclamation Facility by the year 2014, as shown in the
following table.
TabM 4.�2 Spolcar� Courty Wasiewrstr� Tnartm�nt Piant Ca�acity Projaetlora
Yeu , 2004 2005 200a 2007 2005 2008 2010 2011 2Ql2 2013 2014
Flow (mgd) 7.3 7.8 8.1 8.3 8.6 8.8 9.1 9.3 9.6 9.9 i0.1
i
Source: SpOkene COUnty Utilitle8 Depertmertt Note: TT�sss �ro projeaed capacitles to� 3poksns CouMy. The City af Spokane Valley
doea not have Ita own ellotted capeat�►. Spokene Valley does not gusrarttee that wast�water capaaty wltl be awHab{e fa new cansUuctlon in
tt�e future.
Locations and Capacities of Future Facllities
Sewer Construction
The purpose of the County's Septic Tank Elimination (STEP) program is to expedite the
construction of sanitary sewers and dramatically reduce the number of on sewage treatment
facilities over the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer, and to satisfy regulations established by the State
Departments of Heath and Ecology, Spokane County Heaith District and other regulatory agencies.
The Sewer Projects Map found at the end of this chapter shows the areas where sewer will be
extended as a part of the STEP program over the next six years.
Spokane County anticipates that the construction of all sewers within the STEP project areas will be
completed by the end of year 2010. The Sewer Project Priority Map shows areas tfiat have had
sewer lines installed within Spokane Valley and areas that are scheduled to have sewer lines
installed by 2010.
The industrial area in the far northeast corner of the City currently does not have public sewer
service. To encourage economic development and job creation, Spokane Valley may consider
extending public sewer to this area.
Wastewater Treatment Plant
The Spokane County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) will be located at the old
� Stockyards site inside the City of Spokane. The SCRWTP is scheduled to be operational by the
- � Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 36 of 58
Ci�r of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
year 2012. Construction will occur in two phases to meet projected capacity requirements through
the year 2025. Phase 1 will provide a maximum capacity of eight mgd and should be completed `�
by 2012. Phase 2 will provide an additional four mgd capacity. Depending on the rate of growth,
Phase 2 may be completed as early as 2015.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
Wastewater Treatment
Spokane County has programmed capital expenditures for its share of upgrading the City of
Spokane Riverside State Park Reclamation Facility (RPWRF) for the years 2006-2011, as shown in
Table 4.33. The upgrades are required to meet State and Federal sewage treatment guidelines.
Spokane County is also moving forward with plans to construct and operate a new Wastewater
Treatment Plant at the old Stockyards site. Phase 1 construction costs are estimated at $132
million; Phase 2 is estimated at $42 million, bringing the total to $201 million for the new treatment
plant. Capital costs for the years 2006-2011 are shown in Table 4.34.
Tabla 4.33 Costs for Clty of 3pokane Wrrorsfd* Stata Parfc Reclamation Fscflity (RPWR� Upgndes
Pro}�ct 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total
Water Qualiry Upgrade al RPWRF 56,100 S7,300 $1,000 S2.200 58,70Q $8,700 $34.000
Notea:
1. The 2006-2011 estlmates were provided by the City of Spokane.
2. Funds for the RPWRF Upgrades witl come from tfie Wastewater Treatment Plarri Fund and General Fadlit�es
Fund
3. Assumes effluent fiitratlon completed by 2012 to compty with dissalved oxygen total maxlmum daity load (TMDL)
4. Estimates In Thousands of Dollars
Source: Spokene County Six-Year S�wer Constructlon Capital ImprovemeM Program - 2006 through 2011
Tabl� 4.5� Cosb for Nfw WssbwvatK Tn�atrnw�t FscilkNes
Projset 2Q06 2007 200a 2008 2010 2011 To�l
Englneering, Management $�0 $500 5500 , S500 5250 �250 $2,500
and Legal Services �
Land - Pump Stations and �5p0 $1,400 $500 30 � SO � �0 52,440
Treatment Ptant � �
Conveyance � - - - -
DesIgN8ld/Build $0 $875 52,000 59,000 S9,000 SO �20,875
ConsVuction Cost I
Treatment Plant - i
DeslgNBuild Constructlon ' �0 P4,000 59,25Q 518.750 � S20.000 i $20,000 572,000
Cost �
Totals s1,000 S6,T7b 512,250 ' :28,250 ;28,260 ;20,260 :97,775
AnnwlO�bt SKVk�
Payment from Reserves :1,008 SO ' SO SO S4 SO
Cumulative Bond Sales SO S6,776 518,025 =42�276 � =76,525 596,776
Annual Debt Service SO i56T i1,b92 =3,956 :6�404 i8,098
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _
Page 37 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Pian
Tabla 4.34 Cosb for Naw W�s�t� Tnatm�nt factittNs
� ProJsct 2006 200T 200a 2009 2010 2011 Tota!
Notea:
1. The abov8 es�mates are based upon the following assumptiorrs:
- New 8 million gpd piant on tfie Stodcyards site, with flows starting fn 2012.
- Effluent fiitratlon wlll meet the requlrements of the d�asolved oxygen TMDL.
- Outfall to Rebecca SC from the Westewater Treatment Piant (VVV�ITP) slte.
- Pump Stetlon 8 Force Main from Spoicene Valley Iriterceptor to V111NTP.
• Pum� Station 8 Force Maln from No�th Valley Intetceptor to VVINTP.
- DesigNBufidJOpefate caMrad for the WV�fP.
- DesigNBid/Build pubilc wortcs corrtrad for tt�e conveyance pro�Cts.
2. 'Annuat Debt Service" is assumed to commenoe for a giv�en exper�iture in the year fotlowing the expenditure.
The amount shown for 'Annuel Debt Service' includes the estimated debt service to� cumulative expendltures end
assumes the annual sale of 20-year bonds at 5.596 Interest rates. A portlon of the ennual costs may be pald from
ava(table reserves, retfie� than from bond proceeds. For those years where the 'Cumulative Bond Sales' is Ilsted at
S0, it is assumed that tfie previous year's expenditures were paid from reserves. The p�imary souroes of funding are
tfie Ceneral Factfities Fund and Wastewater Treatment Plant Fund.
3. EaUmate in thousands of dollars.
Soun�: Spokane County Sbc-Year Sewer Construction Capital Improvemertt Program - 2006 through 2011
Sewer Construction
The following table represents Spokane County's adopted sewer construction program for 2006
through 2011. The Sewer Projects Map, found at the end of this chapter, shows the bcation of the
sewer projects for the greater Spokane Valley, both inside and outside the City boundary.
Tsbl� I.3a Spokane County Sep�ic Tank Elkniratlon Pro9ram 81x-Year Flnancfng Plan
Pro]eds 2008 200T 200s 2009 2010 2011 Tatal
Valley Sewer Ccnstn.�ction' S17,063 512,312 S17,197 $24,639 $22,989 50 594,20Q
No�th Spokane Sewer ConaUudlon SO i 51,357 54,240 50 52,265 SO � 57,882
, �i
Miscellaneous ' $500 I 5500 I 3500 S500 �5U0 5500 i 53,000
Total -- --- - -� 517,583 ` S14,189 ' S21,937 525,139 S25,754 �500 I 5105,062
Fu�din9 Sourcas � �
- �----- �
State Grant - f $3,750 l S3,750 S3,750 53,750 53,750 SO i S18,750
Generat Facitities Fund 51,333 I $2,523 , 52,603 $666 53,019 SO � 510,144
-�-- -- '
Capital Fadtfdes Rate Prepayments �- 5872 ' $777 �1,134 � 51,038 51,145 -- SO 34,966
� _ - .
Bonds -- 53,488 I S3.108 S4,b36 � 54,153 - 5�4,579 0 519,864
Subsfdy Fundfng from Reserves 58,1 � 54,011 59,914 �, 515,532 513,261 5500 � 551,338
Total - - - - $17,563 � �14.169 i 521,937 � $25,139 $25,754 S500 � $105,062
•Note: Thts table represents projeds bott� Inslde and outslde the Clty of Spokane Val{ey
Amour�ts are tlmea $1,000
Source: ne Cou Slx-Year Sewer Cortstructlon Ca I Im rovement Pr ram - 2006 thro h 2011
Spokane Valley will continue the commitment to replace septic systems with public sewers and will
examine the feasibility of extending public sewer to unserved commercial and industrial areas to
encourage economic development and job creation.
4.4.14 Solid Waste
In 1968, the intergovemmental agency known as the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System
! (System) was formed by interiocal agreement between the City of Spokane, Spokane County and
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 38 of 58
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
all other cities and towns within the County. The System is responsible for implementing solid
waste management plans, planning and developing specific waste management programs and �
updating solid waste plans for the entire County. The System is managed by the City of Spokane,
which uses its structure to carry out the various solid waste management programs for our region.
In Spokane Valley, solid waste services ere provided by private haulers licensed by the Washington
Utility and Transportation Commission (W.U.T.C.) through franchise agreements. Waste
Management of Spokane provides residential and commercial garbage services and weekly
curbside recycling collection; Sunshine Disposal provides only commercial services. At this time,
Spokane Valley residents are allowed to self-haul their garbage to an appropriate dumping site.
Inventory of Exlsting FacftiUes
The Regional Solid Waste System includes a Waste to Energy facility located at 2900 South
Geiger, and two recycling/transfer stations. One of the stations is located within Spokane Valley at
3941 N. Sullivan Road south of Trent and across from the Spokane Industrial Park; the other is
located in north Spokane County at the intersection of Elk-Chattaroy Road and Highway 2.
Landfills are necessary to provide disposal for solid waste that cannot be recycled or incinerated, or
that exceeds the capacity of the WTE Facility. The Spokane County Regional Health District
licenses six privatety owned landfills in Spokane County.
Level of Service
The minimum Regional Level of Service Standards requires solid waste services to meet all State
and Federai regulations.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley is participating on the update of the Spokane County Waste Management Plan
(SCWMP). The SCWMP update process will determine future needs for solid waste disposal.
LocaUons and Capacities of Future Facilities
The updated Spokane County Sotid Waste Management Plan will provide information on future `
regional solid waste facilities.
Finance Plan
The updated Spokane County Solid Waste Management plan will include a financing plan for future
regional solid waste facilities.
4.4.15 Stormwater Facilities
Stormwater runoff in Spokane Valley flows to a combination of public and private facilities. In
developed areas, runoff flows down street gutters and is disposed through drywells in public road
rights-of-way, drywells on private property and grassy swales with overflow drywells in easements
on private property.
There are advantages and disadvantages to relying on on-site facilities for all stormwater
management. One advantage is that on-site facilities are typically constructed with private funds
and can be integrated into the development as a green space amenity. However, on-site facilities
are sometimes not well maintained. Their capacity may be diminished over time or they may fail
entirely during large runoff events. On-site facilities may take up large portions of a development
site, thereby reducing the effective density that can be accommodated in that area.
In 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council created a stormwater utility to develop and maintain storm
drainage systems on public fand. To create revenues for the stormwater utility operations, the
Council adopted an annual fee per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU). Residential ERUs are based
on the number of single-family dwellings, while Commercial ERUs are based on the square footage
of impervious surface associated with a business or commercial development.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities �
Page 39 of 58
Cfty of Spokar�e Valley Comprehenstve Plan
' Inventory of Existing Facllities
Spokane Valley's inventory of stormwater facilities, most of which are integral to the safe function of
our street system, �nsists of about 5,600 drywells, 928 swales six detention ponds, and one
re#ention pond. Other facilities include curb inlets, bridge drains, and culverts, all of wfiich require
monitoring and maintenance. The retention pond, located at Dishman-Mica Road. and 32 Ave.,
was constructed as a part of a road project and provides a disposal point for water flowing from
Chester Creek.
Level of Service
The Spokane County Board of Commissioners adopted new regional level of service standards for
stormwater in 2004 as a part of the Countywide Planning Policies update. The standards reflect
current best practices that are established in adopted stormwater design guidelines. Spokane
Valley follows said guidelines in reviewing and approving new development and is therefore in
compliance with the regional LOS standards for stormwater runoff.
Forecast of Future Needs
Spokane Valley will continue to use private, on-site treatment facilities for new development and will
install drywells, swales and other facilities as needed for new street improvement projects.
Locatlons and Capacities of Future Facilities
Location and capacities of future facilities is dependent on the location and size of new
development, future public street projects, and projects that will address current problem areas
within the City. Future updates to this Capital Facilities Plan will incorporate capital programming
for stoRnwater facilities.
Capital Projects and Financing Plan
The City currently charges a$20 annual stormwater utility fee per Equivalent Residential Unit
(ERU) to gerrerate revenues for stormwater facility engineering, maintenance and administration.
The siormwater fee is expected to generate $1.2 million annually.
Transportatton Facilfdes
Inventory of Existing Factlitles
This section of the Capital Facilities Plan includes transportation facilities within Spokane Valley,
including streets, bridges, pathways and sidewalks. Street maintenance is not included as a part of
the Capital Facilities Plan.
Spokane Valley is responsible for about 455 miles of public roads, including 51 miles of Urban
Principal Arterials, 61 miles of Urban Minor Arterials, 44 miles of Urban Collectors, and 298.85
miles of Local Access Streets. Table 4.36 provides a list of all arterial intersections within Spokane
Valley.
Level of Service
Spokane Valley uses arterial intersection delay as its transportation level of service (LOS). This
LOS is based on travel delay and is expressed as letters 'A" through "F', with "A' being the highest
or best travel condition and "F' being the lowest or worst condition. The lowest acceptable LOS for
signalized arterial intersections is set at "D°; the lowest acceptable LOS for un-signal¢ed arterial
intersections is set at 'E'. This LOS standard conforms to the latest edition of the Highway
Capacity Manual, Specia/ Report 209, published by the Transportation Research Board.
Table 4.36 provides a six and twenty year level of service analysis for all arterial intersections in
Spokane Valley. The analysis uses the regional transpo�tation model prepared and maintained by
the Spokane Regional Transportation Council as its basis for forecasting future intersection
volumes. Levels of service calculations follow Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. The last
column in the table cross-references to capital projacts listed in Table 4.38. These projects will
- address capacit�r deficiencies at the corresponding in#ersection.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated �1-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 40 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tabio 4.36 trttsn�cdon L.�vN ot SQnico Anafysb
2007-
200s 2011 2011 2025 2026 Z012
I�rsectbn Ccunt Control L03 L03 M �� 9 � LOS Mi �� e � ProJec!
LOS' LOS' s
1 4th / Sullivan 2005 Sipnel C B D
2 4th / Thierman 20os 4-way stop A B C
3 4th / Univer5ity 2005 SiQnal C C C
4 8tt1/ BOwdlSh 2000 2-way stop � E E F F 33
5 8th / Cemahan 20a5 �-way accp B C C F F 18,4a
8 8ttt / Dishman-Mica 2004 S�qnal B B C
� 8th / Evergreen 2d03 Signai A A A
a 8th / McDonald 2ao5 2-way smp D E F
s 8th / Park 2005 2-way sioP C C C D C 18
10 8th ! Plnes (SR-2� 2001 2-way stop F F F
t t 8th / Sulllvan 2ao2 Siqnal 8 8 C
12 8tti / Thierman 2000 2-way stnp C E F 18
t� 8th / Univ9r8tty 2005 &lpnel 9 B B
14 16th / Adems 2001 4-way stop A B 0
15 16th ! Bowdish 2006 4-way stop C C C F 0 s3
te 16th ! Dishman-Mica 2004 Sipnel e B e
17 16th / Evefgf�en 2003 Siqnal e /1 I► 3d
te 16th / Mc�onald 2005 4 stop B e C
19 16th / SR 27 2005 Sipnal D D D 2Z, 4Z
20 16th / SulNvan 2004 Sipnat 8 8 C
2� 16th / Universit�+ 2000 Spna1 8 B e
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _
Page 41 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
, Tabio 4.36 Int�nactfon L.�wi ot S�rvfca Anafysb
200T-
In��sactlon Count Co�trol �a 2011 M � s � 2026 MI ��� 2Q12
LOS L09 ��. L�3 ��� Pro)act
s
22 24th / EvBfgreen 2000 4-wap stop A B 8 F F 36
23 24th / Sullhran 2004 Sbnal 8 8 F
24 32t1d / Adam3 200t 2-way sEop B C C
25 32t1d 1 Be�kef 2003 2-way sbop COUNTY COUNTY
28 32nd / Bowdtsh 2005 Sipnal 8 B B 8 B �.7
2� 32nd / Dishman 2002 2 stop e e e
2a 32nd / Evergreen 2002 2-way aop B B B C E Z�, 36
i
29 32nd / Plnes 2005 Sipnal C C C
30 32nd ! SR 27 2005 S�nal C C D
,
3� 32nd I Sultivan 2oa 2-wsy stop COUNTY CouNnr
s2 32nd / University 2005 3bnal � 9 8
33 App�eway ! Barlcer 2o0s Slpnal C C C F F 1, 20� 2a
� M �eway/Dishman �s Stpnal C c C
35 AppBeway / Farr 2oob Sipnal o C C
38 App{�rnr8y / Parlc 2005 Sl�nal C c C
37 Appleway / Thierman 2006 S(gnal 0 E F
38 Applew8y / UttiveBity 2005 Slflnal C B 8 6
39 App18W8y / ViSte 2005 Spnal 8 A N
40 Bf08dw8y / AdBrTts ?005 2-way stop C E F 8
41 Broadway / Argonne 2004 3ipnal A A B 3
42 &OSdwey / BOVYdiSh 2005 Sipnel A A B 8
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q1-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Faciiities
Page 42 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
TabIQ 4.38 IrttKS�ctlon L�vN of Santco Anaiysfs �
2007-
Irttersactbn CouM Control 200b 2011 Mltlyatiad 202b Mtt g�sted 2012
L03 LOS ��. LOS LOS PrO
�
43 Broedway / Evergreen 2005 Sfgne! C D E B
44 Br08dvV3y / Fer1Ch8� 2002 Sipnal D 0 F
45 8f08dwey / FIOfB Z005 2-way stop C F F F F � g �
46 Broadway / McDonald 2aos spnai s e a s
a7 Broadway / Mullan ZOO4 Sqna! e e C e
48 Broadway / Park 2003 Sipna� D D C F C ��� ���
2a
49 Broadway / Pines 2005 Sipnal D F 0 F 6, 22
(SR
50 Braadway / Sulliven 2005 Signal p 0 F 8
51 &vadway / Thierman 2005 S�nat e C F
52 Broadway / University 2002 Sipnal A A A 8
53 Broedwey / VF9te 2002 Sipnal A A A 8
sa Broadwey / Wal-Mart 2005 Sbna� 8 8 C
5 � Central Pre-Mix l 2aos Sbnm e e B
Sullivan
� Dishman-Mica / Z�5 Sbnsi B C o
Bowdish
� D{shman-Mica / 2op Sbnai C C C
Unlversity-Schafer
69 EuGid (narth) / Barker 2002 2-way stop 8 B B C C 28, 3T
59 Euclld (south) I Barlcer 2002 2-way sbop 8 B B C C �2
so EudW / Flore (north) 2003 2 stap B o F 2s
61 EUd'Id / FIOre (SOt1tt1) 2003 2-way stop C D F Z8
ez EUa�d i Pa� �003 2-way stop � e e
s3 Euclid / Sulllvan 200� S+�nai C C C D C so
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9, Chapter 4- Capitai Facilities
Page 43 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tabb 4.36 lMws�ctlon LsvM o! S��vla Matysh
Z00T-
2003 2011 � 2025 � 2012
Inlarsoctfon Count Contra� Mkl��bd Mitlgat�ed
L08 LOS LOS' LOS LOS' ProJtct
t
�t Indiana / Evergreen Zoo� S�pnal e C C
ss IndtaRa / Mall-East 2005 sipnal B e C
88 (ndien8 / Mall 2005 Sipnal B B B
87 I�farta / Mirabeau �4 Sqnat B B e
88 Indiana / Pines (SR- � S�� D C D 2Z
2�
68 II'ldiana / SUIIIVBn 2005 Sipnal C C E
7o Kieman-B ! Sullivan 2003 Sqnal 8 8 C 30
71 K110X / A�Ot1r1@ 2004 Sbrtal 0 D D 19
� Mansfield / Pines 2 � Z F F C C s, �
(SR-2� sloplsiqna!
73 Marietta / Sulfivan 2003 Sipn�l H C F
74 Mirabeau Pky 1 Plnes z � 5 Z F F 8 8 s, z2
(SR-2� stoplsipnal
75 Mlssidl Adaf118 1899 2�+way abop 8 B C
76 Mlsslon / Argonne 2005 Sfpna! � D 0
77 Mlssion / Ba�Cer 20os � pn E F � B
78 Missloti / BowdlBh 1999 2-way stop C E F
79 Misslo� / Evergreen 2002 Sbnef A A A
a0 Mission / MC�onald 2002 Slgnai A A A
et Misslon / Mulian 2oos S�qnai e e C
82 Mission / Par1c 2002 Sipnal B B 8 B B 10
83 Mission ! Pii18s 2002 Sipnal D E D F �
84 Mission ! Suliivan 2005 Sipnal C C F
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capitai Facilities
Page 44 of 58
City of Spakane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Tabl� 4.3i tntarsecUon L�wl ot Sarvicv Mafysis
Z007-
2005 2011 �011 2025 2025 2012
Intfrsaetbn Count Control MFtlgatad Mitigated
L03 L09 10 � L03 � P�joct
�
65 MisSlon / U�iveBity 2004 2-wey atop C E F
8a �0 ��ry � 2004 Signal D D F 21
e7 Morttgomery / 2005 B B C
Shopping Center
88 Montgomery ! 2p02 2 stop D D F
University
89 Rutter I Park 2003 2-way at�p B B 0
90 S81t858 / Sullivan 2004 2-way stop D F F 38
61 Sprague 1 Adams 2oa Siprw� e e c
Sprague 1 Appleway
92 Av� 2002 Sbnal B C F 31
COrbin
s3 Sprague / Argonne 2oos S►pnai B e e
94 Spregue / Barlcef 2005 4-way stop 8 C B F F 24 -
85 Sprague / Bowdlsh 2005 Si�nat C D C D C 6
96 Sprague / Costca 2005 S�nai B 8 B
(east of Camahan)
s� Sprague I Evergreen 2oos 5i�nai c � c � c s
98 SpraguelFanct�er 2002 Siqnai o 0 0
98 Sprague / FaR 2005 Signal A A A
100 Spfdgue / FIOrd 1999 Spnal B C B F D 2d
101 Spr8glle ! GiiliS- 2005 Sbnal C C C 6
to2 Sprague / McDonald 2005 Sipnat D D C F C 6
103 Sprague / Muqan 2005 Sipnal C B B
104 Sprague / Park 2005 Si�nal C B B 11, ZB
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200,9� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _.
Page 45 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
T�bi� 4.3a tnt�r�adlon L�twl ot 8�vk� Analysis
200T-
Int�rs�cUo� Count Control 2005 2011 M ��a� 2025 MI gatad 2012
LOS L03 ��, LOS LOS' PrO
�
105 2�ague / Pines (SR 2005 Si�nal � E C F D 6, ZZ
tod Sprague / Progress 2oos Sqns� C e e e a st
107 SprBgue / Sullivan 2o0b Sipnal D E C F D 31
108 Spregue / Tt�leRnan 20os Sipr�a! 6 9 C
109 Sprague / UNveStty 2005 Slpnal D C D 6
110 SpfegUe / ViSte 2005 Sipnal C A A
� � � TreM (SR -290) / � S�� D E F ,
AtgQtlfl@ ,
Trent (SR-290) /
112 ��� 2004 2-way stop F F F B.0 BTV �
113 E����p290) / 2003 Sipnai B B C
.
�t4 Trer�t (SR•280) / 200o Sipnat C C C
_ Fancher
:
115 TreM (SR-290) / Flora 2003 2-way stiop F F E B7v
t 18 Trent (SR-290) / Patk 2003 S(�nat 9 B B C B 8, BN ,
117 P�� �SR -290� � 2003 Sipnal E F 0 F F 22, BN
� �9 (�SgR-290)I 2002 2�ways�oP c o e
Trent (SR-290) I ���`�
119 Unlvetsity 2005 2-way stop F F Re � 8N
�� TfEtRt (SR-290) / 2p05 S; g r al l�1 B F D 30
Suilivan (Narth Ramp)
12 � Trent (SR / �03 grenal 8 8 F D 30
Su�livan(South Ramp)
122 TreM (SR-290) / VfBte 2003 Sl�na� B B 8 87Y
123 Wellesieyr / Evergreen 2005 4-way stop B B C
124 Wb11e8{ey / PfOQf658 2002 4-vray atop C B B
125 Wel1881Ay 1 SUIIIV811 2002 4�Mray stcp C F F F F 4� 30
� Adopted Ap�il 25, 2006 (Updated 01-Q7-2009,� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 46 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
TabIQ 4.3d IM�rsoctio� Uwl ot 8�rvk:a Malysis
200T-
2005 2011 � 2026 2025 2 � Z
Intars�ctlon Count Control Mkigabd Mitlgated
LOS LOS ��. LOS lOS• ProJad
f
Note: See Table 4.38 for a(isyng of capital improvsmant proJects.
Regional Level of Service
The Countywide Planning Policies require that LOS standards be adopted in accordance with the
regional minimum level of service standards set by the Growth Management Steering Committee of
Elected Officials. The Steering Committee approved the use of corridor travel time for use in
establishing the regional Vansportation system.
The Spokane Regional Trensportation Council is determining annual average corridor travel time
through a trave! time study. This study is still in progress and corridor travel time Level of Service
standards will be adopted upon its completion.
Uses of Level of Servlce Standards
As measures of transportation effectiveness, LOS standards can help jurisdictions identify where
and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affiect
system operation. Level of senrice provides a standard below which a transportation facility or
system is not considered adequate.
Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the _
surrounding road system. They can also be used to identify problems, suggest remedial actions
and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a comerstone in the _
development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which makes development pay some of the
costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure.
The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) performed traffic modeling for the urban
area, considering future population growth and distribution. This model examines the performance
of the entire urban transportation system. Improvements to provide for the increased traffic
volumes shown by the model at the adopted level of service standards, are included in this plan.
More information on the transportation modeling based on future land use assumptions is contained
in Chapter 3, Transportation.
Relatlonship to Concurrency Management
Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development_ The concept of concurrency
predates the Growth Management Act for some public facilities, specifically through SEPA
mitigation requirements. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that
new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that
development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of
service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. "Adequate
capacity refers to the maintenance of concurrency° (WAC 365-195-835).
State Transportatlon Facilitles
The Growth Management Act requires local jurisdictions to include inventory and Level of Service
information for state transportation facilities in their Comprehensive Plans. State facilities are
divided into finro categories: Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS), and Regionally Significant
Highways (non-HSS). The Growth Management Act requires non-HSS facilities to be subject to
concurrency. The following table lists State highways serving Spokane County.
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities __
Page 47 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
State Transportadon Level of Service
The Washington State Department of Transportation Tabw 4.3� st�. Hi�t�way�
(WSDO� requires state transportation facilities in H`g ���� ����
urban areas (inside the UGA) to maintain a minimum
Level of Service standard °D." In rural areas 1_90 Interstale Hss
(outside the UGA), the minimum LOS standard �s sR-2� �ne� Road �Non-�iss
'C." Those areas fying outside the UGA that may _ _
have urban characteristics can be evaluated by the sR-2so TreniAvenue ;Non-HSs
WSDOT in conjunction with the City on a case-by- . Hss = Highway of Statewlde SigniflcanCe
case basis to determine which standard is the most Non-HSS = Regionally Slgniflcant Highway
appropriate frt.
Intergovernmental Coordination
Transportation plans were distributed for comment to all jurisdictions that may be irnpacted by, or
impact, Spokane Valley's transportation system, including adJacent towns and cities, Spokane
County, Spokane Transit Authority, Washington State DOT, and Spokane Regional Transportation
Council (SRTC). SRTC has overall responsibility for intergovemmental coordination of
transportation plans. Each jurisdiction in the region must submit transportation plans to SRTC for
inclusion in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan. SRTC responsibilities include: 1) Certifying the
transportation elements of comprehensive plans adopted by the County, cities and towns in the
region for consistency with the Metropolitan Transportation Plan; 2) Maintaining consistency
between infrastructure plans and land use development plans, and 3) Reviewing LOS thresholds
for transportation facilities in the Spokane Region.
SRTC is also responsible for monitoring and evaluating the performance of regional transportation
facilities as affected by land use and transportation improvement decisions. Concunency
management is linked to the planning process. Any amendments to the comprehensive plans
require a concurrency management system analysis and must meet thresholds before their
adoption. SRTC will annually assess the regional transportation system with respect to regional
concurrency.
Capital Facilftles Pro)ects and Financing
Capital Projects
Table 4.38 contains a comp(ete list of transportation related capital projects for the years 2008
through 2013, totaling over $95 million. The City updates the six year TIP throughout the year as
project priorities and funding changes. This Plan adopts by reference any updates to the TIP
occurring between Plan update cycles. The current TIP is available for viewing online at
www.spokanevalley.org. These projects address capacity issues at intersections and safety
improvements. Following is a discussion of potential funding sources.
Funding Sources
Funding for the operation and expansion of the City's transportation system falls into several
categories, which include federal, state and city funds. Some sources consist of reliable annual
funds while others are periodic, such as grants. The use, availability and applicability of these
various sources are not always at the discretion of the City. Spokane Valley will develop a track
record with funding agencies as time goes on, which will help make to make more reliable funding
assumptions.
A summary of expected federal, state and local funding sources for the City's six year Capital
Improvement Program is shown in Table 4.39. The following is a summary of transportation
funding options.
Federal Assistance
These funds are authorized under the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equit�r
Act for the 21� Century (SAFETEA-21) and are administered by the Federal Highway
Administration through Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009) Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 46 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Planning Organization (Spokane Regional Transportation Council). Federal funding programs
include Bridge Replacement (BR), Congestion Management and Air Quality (CMAQ) and the
Surface Transportation Program (STP).
State Assistance
The Washington State Transportation Improvement Board administers State transportation
programs, including the Urban Corridor Program (UCP), the Urban Arterial Program (UAP), and the
Sidewalk Program (SP).
City Funds
Spokane Valley contributes revenues from the General Fund and the Real Estate Excise Tax funds
for transportation projects. The Ci�r also receives State Motor Fuel Tax and Restricted State Fuel
Tax.
. �ft�#�a��#t
�9A8-�9�'�,a
I �885
� A�}� Ffe� �a P� ��r-�',�eu� �at�i-A�rr�
* S�e�o � A�►et��
a � -__ .-:�: _ _. _ _. _ _ _ :,x--�: _:: �:�:;.�=. r-� �:-3 >�-: �:: .. �-�;a
s ���k � � �
� s�8-a� . . �-��:�s G+�y � , .�
$ ��� ���;► �c�ea �R �a 2�.
8 8fe��nra�r-t�r�---P�s �t„zas F�-k ldAi� � �3
F��:ac
�G 8fea�waY-Far�: �.�p{� �a �
�
�aS��y�Al�G�e 9t����; � �
��
� S _ �1�' T"*4TC^? 't.""T'f1 't L tlV
� �� &�s L�,;�r�r�:u;# S�F;�; 4 ,-0
� �� . _ _ __..�,
.�� �P �� �
I r4�*�-���t3ta� �3 �b6�
Table 4.38 Six-Year Transaortation Caaital Facilities and Financina Ptan
2009-2014
dollars in thousands
2009
ej� ProlQCt � m To �fma Cttv Amount Total Annual
# ource (�] Amount
Q Broadwav Avenue SafeN Plnes Rd !SR-271 Park Road � � $�
Proied
� Adopted April 25, 200fi (Updated 01-47-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities _
Page 49 of 58
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
1 Plr►e�Mlansfield IPE 24� 1.798
g �artcef Road Brfd� �S � 4.159
,� A�oiewav/Soraaue/Dishman- �rn��tate 90 Dishman-Mic� �$Q �Q �
Mica ITS
4 STEP Paveback �f 1.7.�]. 1•50Q
¢ Street Pteserva�a�t Pro�i- �y 1.224 1.283
Various Streets
g &oadwav Av�ue 1 �� ast of Flora R � 1� �Q
� AQOEevvav Blvd �c �� �SP �.i �3Z
4 yySDOT Ur�an Rarrro Proied- � � �
�roadwav.At�anne. Freya U�
� Pines/S�a�ue Irttersec�l4n � � �
PS�
14 44th Ave Pathwav – Sands to � W�� STPIEI � �,$
�B�
� 8roadwav Avenue Rehat� � Fenchef Road Thlerma� Road TS PNl Q� �
� Park Road �It2 lPE oNv) Bro Avenue i n STPNI _4Q �
�¢ Sar�gue Avenue Resurfadn_c� nive�si Evercmreen �i y �$5,$ 2,856
� EverareeNS�r�ue � � 1.133
Int�ecdon PCC
� McDonaki/Snraque � � 1
Jrnersecti� PCC
Annual Total �j,� 18.439
I – - — �L�a
'�} Rs'y� � �8 �i+Fri� � 'rQ7a�-�i�
� S'4ii3F63 �tii'fa13s^c� '�� � r'�i�
3 �ac;;� �.�-��e � r� =;�•?-=�=;�a� T:--�:_s �R ��^., 3��
a S�R�ati+e�sk G+�► 8�A �
.:
� �� � �-�y �a2 :��
a a�tewa�t.8h�� L�+ve�-.y �er�:saa s�R �s�a �
� ���+� s�a �� :��
����►-�
� � e� es �a
� • 6a� ��a�^,a s�A 2� �
� da� L:s��a# �T�P{�} � 349
�-6 B�at�v�k�-Ava� �aa�r �a.� S�R�1d� � �8
�-6 Z-88 R�c �P£:d� �8 �4+
� �ay ��iaaa S�R{�y �8 3�
. -- Tp t"!rf`t-�rr,^Q�,.� -.�f -M��� Crr" C7 �
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 50 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
I ��
�tef� Fte}e�i F�v, �'-�? Fi�r G4#� �':st�laQ:�4?��sl
M � mttVasac'� �rf?i V �.:rS
I �� i ._-
`,;.,?:i�� -�! S :.,;:7
2010
t r Prolect From To Primanr Citv Amount Totai Ann�al
� Source �] A ou
4 STEP Paveback � �,2Q4 1.399
¢ Street Pr�servation Proiect C� 1,224 1.293
18Q ft. east vf
� Broadway Ave Moore Elora Road � � �.�oa
Z AQplewav Extettsion ni E�green ahet 2� 2.859
� SullivaNSotaaue Intersecxlon STP(U� �],� �
PS&
L Mansfleld Exte�sion Plnes (SR-27l Mirabeau Prkwv � � 1.038
� Flora Road S°raaue issio I.�AP $,Q 4�
Park Road (Bridcino the Other
1 � Vallev) Federal �1 I�4
�4 �gue Resurfadnc,��2 Evergreen suriiva� �1�t ?� ?�
� Sulllvan Rd lPE Ontv) �udid IWe lesiev TP QQ �
� Indiana/Sullivan Intersection � �7,� 1.342
��
� Broadwav/Sulllvan Intersecxlon � � 1.230
PCC
� �gonne Road Interstate 90 Tren CMA 77 ,�7fi
� �ullivan Road W�est Bridae � Q �
�$ Braa Avenue ic�r arker UCP ¢� �
� Applewav-Theirman E8 Lane CMAQ � �¢
Annual Total t 7.026 18.027
I �A�
1#��R Ffaj� Ff-�t► '3 F�a�,f�� �4'f-0►1i'�8�t�i =�i��-�:,t��a
r �JiFi:� �} �'�ei}��:,•c;!
Cf � - r9 ��-� r%�i-� b-r:�' tfcJi� i--r,i
� ` ' r�'. _ ' � ' 6.+� ',�8� -'�2�
8 A�leway �� �w.�rae� � � 4,�8�
� ��� 4'��d � &849
� ��� �� S�A� � �
� Adopted Aprii 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 51 of 58
City of Spokane Vailey Comprehensive Plan
I �$-#-0
'ri� Fls��-3si F�3�i •�� F�t� EiiE�i-�'+ti'.t�.►��it �"����,A����a�
;; Sa.��:� #S�3 A.rt�arF
=,-3 �_-;��,�-=� � - t,.a.,�.;=_.�� '_�--�� ��3 ----•
�8 � � ' ' _rt��-:•.�, �� .�� 8�
F�
� �R� J--99 -T.-�$r,� �AAA�Q i-T- -§�
� S ` ^ :�i-�Qe�6�ief► �al�-6�k,� &� � �b
�� �e-«� L�va�e6le� S�P{Idj 48 2�88
� 8Fi 4 ?3a
�4 �� &�A �-8 �S
�3 R � � �a3 a-2�.'�
I A��ua;-?�-<=1 t-a8:-� ��,2��
��
� Pro From ,T� Primarv Citv Amount Totnl Annu�l
# Source � Amoun
� S7EP Paveback C�l 1� 1,399
Q Street PreservaUon Pralect S�C 1.�.4 1.293
j Aop{evvatt 8hrd Unl � S� 44Q �.7�4
� Manstfeld ExGens}on Pines Rd (SR-27� Mirebeau Pk�w I�P_ �$0_ �.44a
�,¢ Flora Road �u_� Mifssl� � ?�$$ 1.487
F'ark Road_— Bridgl� the Other F�eral �Q 2.150
1 $ Valrev
gg &gonne Road Interstete 90 Tret�t S�A� 141 �
� Sullfvan Rd West B�id�e �S 4 ?�
,'�$ Bro�dv�r�v Avertu� F�4r� �es �P �4 2�4
�,Q Aoolewav-Thlennan EB lane � � L
,�Q Mission AvBtlue F1Q� � � � �
� plahman-Mlca Rehab � �
STP(P1 202 1.500
�h Sc1S�C.1�.�1�
,gj SalteselS�Ipvan Stan� � 144 414
� Pines Carr�da IT� Soraque .,?�g� S�AQ 280 2•OS1
3¢ Barker Road A� @�4��Y S�Ae 1� �
Annuel Total t 4.�8 tZ2.63$
I �,
-r
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 52 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
� Rfc�j�-:.� �ar•� ?'� �r�r�a� ��� �a�-A�R�
� Sw;r•aa FS) �t
O �-i� �•i�/ L!{'r✓ �-+=r�
� ; _ �` 6�P} �A2 �8,2
8 -A�3;eway�iv� -��w=�; �+ -�"wec:�f� �GR 3g8 -&48�
� �� �'$�'� G��e�-Federa4 2� -��899
�$ F��-R�oa� S�a�a -�M5&�} t�nt� ?�3 �3�
�0 -A��a�e--Rt-aa� �-98 �c�= � C-�� -� ;��2
� -��-R���E-�►t� �.� �'al�est� S�?� -48 -�S
�3 ' ' 8R -9 --f3b
�6 S�f3gt#e -�+i G�A,AQ �89 28&�
I ,2-� ' G?" ' � G4 -4�4
I A��ua��al �-Z6��4 S�a886
2012
I� ro From Io rima C�it t Total Annuai
� ou Amount�S� Amount
,� Street PreservaUon Proiects � 2.261 �,�,Q�
1¢ Flora Road Sofague Mission I�g,P � 1.337
Park Road — BridginQ th� Qt�
1 � Vailev �ed�r�l ?� 6.�49
27 Suftivan Road West Bridqe ¢g Q 4•Q56
?� �Y F14� �e� S�P � 2�$Zfi
�2 �!� fl� � S�A� � J.7o�
�¢ �arker Road A Broadwav � 2$� 1 44
� Park Road -�2 fCN onlv) @�Q�y Indfana STP(Ul �Q 2.000
�I � �t �1 7.� 1�
� Eve a� SR 27 �LShc � �
�,Q Barker Road � lewa ,� �4 �7].
Annusl Total S 4.482 � 23.616
I ��
� =t� F����t �r0� � r��e�.:�r� r+'� ;;3��-`-�r�t1ua
� &>�If,,'� /�,'{i6t![1�{`v� A{4ii}�?t}i
� --�i;-:-:;i �i1i�l -�-�� -;-Ct��
� � � � ��
a8 � -��aa-��7 � -:�:,a:-a ST+�i�) -,�t-0 -a�A4
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated Q1-07-200� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 53 of 56
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
I �-a
� R�� Frt�a �a #�#a�;:� 61:� T::���4,
'�' Ss�3 r�iiAiiflt£�r + . : ; . , _: :, -: :
�a� �' _ = _' r• _ — _ _, �. � � , ,. _ .- _ �:�+'r= .- -
,_J _J•� r.{'�.-. _a
� � �i#�Ft3er� -� �� � �
3� -�G9F-R� ��;91�f2� -��32f�1M�jl � -�$ ' �
33 -5���1Y8 ��ve��4?�+ ��e� &�P{R) -f►& ���
� "' �� -�" &�{�}y �-88 �
F�
( A�+�aal�et�! S�;4b8 S-�3�#
I Z_�
Item PrQ}ect F�om To Prim Citv Amount Total Annual
# Sour j�] Amount
I � Street Preservation Prolect S1IY 2-260 2.391
� Park Road — B�i�glns� the �.� � ��
Vallev FederaJ
� Sullivan Road F�tensfan @faeio�r Guld� ,CcmL � �
j� Sullivan Road VVest Brl�lae BH � 4 •�
�,Q Misslon Avenue F14ifl @�tl�t S� �4 1.551
3� �a�lce� Rasd Aoolewav �4�1 S�P 1$$ �
� Park Road - #2 (CN onlv� Broadwav l�I� � �L4 ?.�?�
,'�7 3 Avenue E� �I �TPSS�LI 24 1?�
}� Ever�tee[V�2� STPM 755 3,681
I E��� �
�$ Barker Road � A�Pl�._Y l�SP �4 444
� St�livan Road (RW/GN onhr) Eudid YY4!l�1�1c �IPl�l ]�4 $�
gZ Pines Corrfdor ITS °raSuQ � �MA� 1� Z�
4� Sullivan Roed Reha� lndiana EuclidQ $JPSP1 � 1�
� 3 Avenu� Re�ab Dishman-Mira SR.27 STP(P.2 �9 Z�
( Annu�l Total i 4.589 ��:$
I ��
4i+s�-�', rfw•}=-�= i-r�� �'-o R.:,�,�:� C�'�}-���: 5����I
� �� {;} �ou�
� - _ � - ; c�+:7 -� ��:� �-f :�
�
�,.a . _' �f�U'y9 $R -� ��8
�8 -N2F�F�i63�-� -�tv3��'Vajf �+�:3��3 �� -�i�4 -�
( Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-0� 200,9� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 54 of 58
City af Sp�kar�e� Walley �or�pr�l��r��i�e P��r�
� � �
�&tx"i ��� �..�f� �-� �"�tis�i� '�le�f-�t�.-�.�?t:=se -�ir:'��-.'�e-*�fi�+��
ir �A� ti ,isc:L`}' ;;�,:
. _ _ • �, r , ay ���t� �
^.`� _a - : r . . , . �� ��r.'�! - 7
a?'.. . 4 w-x r � r . .�.��1
#r^ r � -
� . � � � � � �-Y--�
� �f�v�i `' - �'�. - t1�4�'d�# !�','��! `� �-'�r��S
� ���J+�°'��� -��{�9E�5+�'� � � �� -�
� x;l �P�t'o� r� t •f'4. :���'r °� �' Y 1 ! C
�4 -��:�tr-�� � '��i- _k.';...�� a-� �$�i
� -'�e�Tl�rl.� ,.,.iW,:�' k� �iWFT5�7F ���� �� ��
,� �' � �I N P..y n D.a r � .'r � -�� -��'G`Cr�'� �1 �i^�'�� -�
� - �
� !�,'k��,i a.�dfr`������*� -ea�l�s �.�r�r - #'7 - 7�
T � ��...�3� . �r g.. JS �t !1� �
-s�� I �•ff`��-S - r .r � _'#i,i�P °e-.. -� � - -��
1 ,�'i�'f�"#4's���'��'r 'F-.���� �'���r'�i
�
��'� �
I�� i�E�r : Frorr� Tc� rima �Itv Amaun� Tvta1 �#nn�ua,�
t� ���r�+� �$} rneun
5 Str+�t PE���ervatia� ��ai�ec't � � �.391
� 3�2 ��nue ��.q�t] � �� � �
3� Barker F:aad $_.. ��v4r 11�P ��{? 2,�449
� S+�II�r�� Roa� fR'JVt�N onlv] E�c �d W�I��l�v ��Pf�] �5. �
d3 � li �r� o�tf Fteh In I n �uc�i� STR�i�) 12� �
—
� �isltr�aa�-Mica �� T�4 P�P� � 1.1�8
�¢i am han TrtZ�k L�ne � Citv �Irni�� S��J� 3�' �
� Ao��l�nrav �xt�o�sls�n �L�.4 . � � � �4.
� U�hr�rs Rc�ad [ntay -- 2 � - 4 — STPfPI — �7 �, -
� lJnlrr�rr��ty� f�aad le���v �� f�ishm�r�-M#Ca �5 ST��F�� 2� 9�
� �ark Ro�ad - #3 s�� � �,�.� � 14i
� Bar�ce�r �c�c� - - S[�ok�n�e �iw�r �� ��1 � ',��Q'�
F�+�ra E�d �
� Eudl�9 �,ve1F#ara �a�d �T�[U� � .�Z�
�a�+�i�d ���r� ��
Anr�ual Total � �4i�1�7 ��3�
'T�k�l+e �4,3� $ix Y��C'���i ���t�t��� Im�rav�rrEe�t �ra�rarr� Sa�mma�r �0�9 Tk�rc�uoh 21�i� ��n ��.�1�k01
P �
'Y�ea:r Fed�ral 5ta�a C��r � Tc�l ��de�rai S�t� �th� � � r�ttal F�d�a# Stat� C�th�r 'r� Tota�
� Ad��t�d �Rril 25, �L��6 ��Jpda#ed 41-�7'-��10�] Ch��ter � - �ap�t�� F��ilitie�
P��� �� �af �B
Ciry of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
� �1 1.�� �4� � � 14�� 4� � 4� �1 �4� �a'44 1�� �'t 7�4Z 18.439
�Q 1�,Q 1,�fi ?�44 � q� �Z,1� 1.759 1.647 ,� 9.023 9�? 1,'�,� 6 1 7,290 1 027
� � Q Q ,�Q�}7 4� � $,,�¢ 414 17 17.152 �$ 9.136 414 4� �$
2) Q Q Q � � � � '� �1 �� � Q,�,`! 404 4,,,�1 16
� Q Q Q �.�.�1 �$]. 14��. �]�4 414 ?� �? �.��4 �Q 41Q 41�4 24.348
�' Q Q Q �� Z.�.1. �� 1� � 1.14� ].Q.44� �$ � � 4 ��$ ��
1 1 6 44 775 1 7 4 7 1 33100
f - - ���-t�di��-Ta . �
�� Fa�ar�i ��ta 6�ar �iFy �-e�t
�nn� • n-� C�-�-% �$ :t3� �'s'*� C T�3-�
�•n?ti
�t�38 �-�'►•3,� S-� v'si-.�o &-�4� i-�r�
�A �3 �-`_�; � &�ds6f 8 t►a,8�4 �r7�
24�-� 58 � 5�4� i3 528;88�
�3 S� 58�8 S8 5�,8�A i�
28�d 5�8�� 52-�-� S-a �$ t-�t�;§84
�e�a} �9a4 t�&� �9 S�a� �,86�
Table 4 40 Six Year Transoortation Improvement Pros�ram 2009 Throu4h 2014 (in 51,0001
L atch Wit Existin Resou
Protect Name Proiect Deacrictlon Total Cost
8th Avenue PhasQ 1- Camahan to
Havena Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a threa lane section with curb. �2.615
i n k I
8th Avenue Phase 2- Park to DickeY ReconsVuct 8th Avenue to a three lane section with cur�. 53.156
u er i Ik nd bike lanes
Bth Avenue Phase 3- Dickev t4
Cama�han Reconstruct 8th Avenue to a three land section wtth curb. 53.811
I n ike
Barker Ro�d ReconsVuctlon - 32nd to
$�1 Spokane County Proje� reoonstruct Barker to 3 land �
'o • C' r ma
Bawdish Road Rehab - 32nd to 8th &4.593
n adwa o r I
f3avvciish Ro�d Rehab - Dishman-Mica t� �
i ri and inl i'n ad
SR-27lPinesM6th Intersection $3•132
' n I n
UniversitvlSnraaue Intersec�on PCC Reolace asphatt aavement with oortland cement ooncrete �
TOTAL• �
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009, Chapter 4- Capital Facil�ties
Page 56 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Potentlal Annexation AreaslUrban Services
The Growth Management Act repuires that counties desiqnate urban qrowth areas (UGAs). The City of
Spokane Vallev identified lands adiacent to the Citv within existing UGAs that would likely be develoaed
for urban uses and qotentially be annexed to the City. In order to assess the need for capital facilities, the
Citv has identified �xistina servi�e Qroviders within the Potential Annexation Areas IPAAs). This
assessment should help identifv the effects a potential annexation area will have on existinQ levels of
service.
Table 4.41 Exlstlna Urban Servlce Provlders wfthtn Potentfal Annexatlon Areas (PAAs)
PAAs Northwood Northeast Eas Southeast 3outh Ponderosa EdQeclfH
Domesilc Water Pasadena Par1c Consolidate� Cons�dated Vera Vera S C. W Q. No 3 East Sookane
Hutton Setllement ��i S.C. W.D. No� 3 �
F b E F.D. No,) � 9 F. D, No.1 �,D• Na 1 F.O. No. 1 d 6 F.O. No. t� 8 F.D. No. 8 F.D. No. 1 d B
Law EntorcemerR Sookene CounN Seokane CounN S�ak�ne CounN Sookene Court�r Sooksne Count� S�okane CounN S��Icane Carnhr
Ub�ies S.C. Librarv Dis� S.C. Lbrorv Dist S.C. L�ran► Dist S.C. Lt�ran Dist. S.C. U�an Dist �.C, Ub�r Dist S.C. L�anr Dt�t
Parks � Open S�sGe Sookane Countv ,�pokane Countv Sookane CounN Sookene Courttv Sookane CounN Sookane CaunM S�Icane Countv
Public Schools W.V. S.D. 6 S.D. 81 E.V. S•p . v. s.o. C,V• S,D. C•V, S.D• V. ,D W.V. &D. � S.D. 81
PuMk Trortslt Nd eva�able Not ava��le Nd availebl� No v eble Npt avaiable Not evailable Not eve�abb
Sanitarv Sewer Sookane Countv Sookane Countv Sookane CounN �kene CounN ��kane Count� Ngt Sewerg� S�dcene CounN
So�ld Waste/Recyde Waste Mamt Wast t Wa W m Wasi� M o tl Waste Mamt. Waste M4mt
Storm water Soak�ne CounN Srakane CounN S�olcene Co�N �okane Countv Sookane CounN Saokane CounN Sookene CounN
Street Cleanino Soakane CounN Sookane CounN Saakane Countv Scokane Camtv Snokane Countv �icane CamN �okene CounN
� S�oicane Co�mtv S�okane Cotmtv I Sookane CounN �oknne CamN Sookane Cotimtv Sc�ne CaunN Snokane CounN
The City of Spokane Vallev has adopted Levels of Service (LOS) to measure a public facility or service's
Op@ rational characteristics to gauQe its performance, The following analvsis will assess current levels of
service in the PAAs to �rovide a context of how annexation could affect the City's LOS and arovide
guidance for ahasing of annexations. Additionallv, the analvsis will vrovide Citv staff and elected officials
information to assist in the planning and budqetinQ of public service deliverv as a resuft of annexation to
the City of S�okane Vallev.
The following study includes LOS ana�rsis for sanitary sewer and parks and oaen space, Analvsis is not
provided for services where the Citv has adoated the minimum re�ional LOS. Senrices excluded from
this analysis are domestic water, fire protection, law enforcement, libraries. Qublic schools, public transit.
sani�ary sewer. solid wastelrecycle. storm water, street cleaning, and trans�ortation.
I�a level of service is measured on a per caaita basis. the �o�ulation assumotions are based on Table
2.1(Land Ca�acitv Analys+s) in the Land Use chaater and S�okane Countv's estimated current po�ulation
in the MetroQOlitan Urban Growth Areas (UGAs). The Cfir of Spokane Valley's land caqacitv analvsis is
based on the adopted regional methodoloqv.
Sanitarv Sewer
The City of Spokane Valley does not provide sanitary sewer service at this time, Spokane Countv
provides wastewater collection and transaort svstems within the Citv of Spokane Valley. Incorporated
areas must hav� wastewater colleGtion and transport svstems in accordance with the adoQted sewer
concurrency requirements. The table below provides a sewer assessment within the PAAs. Level of
servi� is cat�gorized as sewered, within the 6-year sewer �lan, or not alanned for sewer.
Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-2009� Chapter 4- Capital Facilities
Page 57 of 58
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
� jable 4 42 Sower asses ment wlthln Potonttai Annexatlon Areas (PAAsI In Act'es
I PAAs Tota Sewervd Withln 6-vear Sewer not Peresntape
C�p ered
Northwood 1 82 Q7 0 4 77
� 0 1
�
� 7
�h 1 1
Ponderosa 7 0
Edgedlft 7
Currently Sqokane County owns a caaaci� allocation of 10 million aallons per dav (mad) in the Spokane
Advanced Wastewater Treatt'rtent Plant (SAWTPI. B y the year 2020, the Countv's flow is proie�ied to
reach 21 m�d In 1999 S�okane Countv began a Wastewater Facilities Pian oroces to evaluate lonq-
term reaional wastewater needs and to determine alternatives to meet those needs. The resu�t was a
decision bv the Board of Countv Commissioners to build a new S�okane Countv Reaional Water
Reclamation Facilitv (SCRWRF) St�okane Countv is aropasin to construct a new reaional wastewater
treatment alant at the Stock yards site in the Citv of Spokane. The new treatment �lant and associated
facilities will provide add�tional capac'rt for in�reased wastewater flows Qenerated bv the Countv's Seatic
Eliminati�n Propram and for projected �rowth in the Countv's service area. Manv of the PAAs have
�p services however new develo�ment will continue to add demand for new sewer services. The C�tv
should evaluate existinq sewer treatment capacitv and infrastructure prior to annexation.
Parks and Onen Saace
The CitY of Saokane Vallev has an adopted level of service Qf 1.92 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents.
In 2007 Sc�okan� Countv commissioned a fiscal studv of the Urban Growth Areas IUGAsI. The report
focuses on the services provided bv Spakane Counhr to the metropolitan UGAs and the revenue
Qenerated for S�okane Countv in these ereas. The report established a base pooulation in the
m etroc�olita� UGAs usinq 2000 Census data and buildin uermits The estimated aoaulation for the
UGAs adiacent to the Cfir of Saokane Vallev wes determined to be 7 294. The Citv of S�okane Vallev
2007 Land Quantitv Analvsis (LQA) estimated the I�nd caoacitv in the PAAs could ootentiallv add 13 406
additional residents Usin the population estimate frorr� SQOkane Countv's fiscal studv and the C'ttv of
Spokane Vallev's estim�ted land c�aacit there is the �otential of 20 700 residents at build out in the
PAAs Current)v thera are no oarks in the �AAs If the City annexed all the PAAs 40 acres of partcland
would be needed to meet the curtent level of service of 1.92 acres.
Accordinq to the Cit_,y's Park Master Ptan mar�y residents in the Citv of S�okane Vallev are not
convenierttiv tocated near a oark The Citv's Pa�lc Master Pl�n states that parks should be one of the
highest oriorities for the City The plan a�so �tates that meeting Park needs can be a challenQe in
�gig hborhoods where little vacant land exists Manv residents ex�ressed a desire for saorts fields
(compl8xes) theS� facilities,9eneraltY re4uire I�rge vacant oroperties The C' should consider
p�r h� i q parkland prior to annexation to ensure adequate facilities will be available to serve
neighbofioods in Potential Annexation Areas (PAAs).
� Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated 01-07-200� Chapter 4- Cepital Facilities
Page 58 of 58
- "_ - - - - - - - - - - ,��: -�- =, - � - -- -- - - - ;- -���.�� - ,� - -' - - - - - - - ��- ,- - - - � _ . Map 4 1
: ' ���
, _�- � � `- r;;. , o+anc� n � , = wN�+ •
� � � / j�� % � ar4 � � (�mpan�,�`ta,''
� 2�a3 ; { �� `-� If��qiM1A J � � ' � r � �t � ^ W�ter Districts &
( �3 � � �' r- 1 y.7hr �rt!�� -- '�_�� � u �� � lS � � �� � JI !,ti'' = �
1 � � ,{�
� � ' � ' � ' � � � � ""` Well Heads
� � � µ. 1 � , fR � � lbm�MWcd`'� �
� � ,`� �I IlWibn � Irti� iun � � =l � IrnCntuin ,�Sif�l -_� -
F" � � "f �. ._ . i—.Sr111ra1tAt -- • -- - -- � —U��trul Il'�L --
- � � - :f - blMr � �) � � � � � � � Tinibcrim� �
m
� � i � � I � � ' ' ' ' 1 � = ' i ti1a4Ut �
� ilome 1'nr1
� / � � � i '-
•4 I� S�r.la,
, � a 1 _ �' I �'i 1 /�) _ t�l-1 t111i �v, r �
tn' T" / � �, !�w�► � LCgeDd
' i — k, �--�-.- - - � ' i�� \� � � �
� �
�,
� � '`
n,Sour � 1 `� h,,,�,_ _ I �i�'' �apv {A+ua h*vrra�
- •.y, -- -- ir'ri�x '�- .7�cn�»im - - - ; } ,
D�t'r7i i�. �� ,• � .,,� � � � � � � Gp� ol9ookarn Wal�r �via
�- � � � IRM 1Vi f U rl K � �� :
• C'nt ��kaM I 'Gr�.r. � �{ ; ' N
'drr se � w - �! �" � �'` � � Gry of SpokMt V�Ye�
` t I ��� f � 11 I� i� /y ����
' i I' ' I - � ' _ • i I � � � ' • Y�q � W� {'��
�/ 1 _ � _ •� � M� 1
�..J � � � ur u t �'t'. nuduls��a � �"�! T .-- ` - Z' ; • proup D W�11 Htadr
(i�uit .�r�kRil(''(�ouM�- _ .1 — � ry, {f11 h linX+�t�m Y nlidsl[d �� � � � - r
� '� � � ��'a{�i i�lr�tt � M�i�r.l'n�l� � � � i ir4 I � i litf��n� � ]'� I C �� �� r �- - - � UftiY1CIlOW1�lAlY
` _ • FS t � 1� _ 4 �I �II �l� / � .1 ' 1- - '
� .. --� _� .I _ ' s.., \� � '�' ' � W.ar sodas
'} _ .
�'a s ' _ y,. �_ � _
� � �1M „_ � � • � � � L'+�')
■ � i • - I I
� � .� 1
C�� 1 Ylfy_171YM � T I I��+. � �� I � '
� liff��lv+n , . � ���� I �
i Iri[I r' � [liilf+:rt���5'r • Ir fn IKttk I � � �
_ � _ ,_ 1�'8 � .amp � �� � .
� � _� � � i fii � � �� � s
o I � � � �� � ,� l� � � .fl�f � � � ' 1-P' .l�1 '
j� � j �! � ` ' ' r .�� �-x � � � i � 1
� � r � � , � 'W�l ' _ � I I �, �
�- < < �' .
-- - _ --. � � I
� = y'� . ,_ . � • C T�i� � + - - _, . ���r«
-� '�tt tipc�l nr' ; �, P L I � ��uuwlnLlt�� ���
� - , " � .N Nt r ..- _ '- _ � ' � � � I�
� - Itrl:tlr�w �
Di��rirt AI � � � - . _ � ,� I � � UM�rxf �Y� �
' 1 ` � 1 I.a - ���• .
� � � � � y'�. �
� ' ,� -. �
(lh of � � _ ~ ' - _ � p .�rf� � � I � , :
\ �
StrS�a4aae � : w - = �--� - I �_ _ • )p . 2v
� W� cr irnic� � �� 1 h , - , 1 � i
�km� C'e u�! • -r � �
•nr
- �► 7 � { �- -. 'w.��na���Ei , , - - - - �
sm� � �`� �1 �/� t / �- � �rl�arkm� n n'� � � � � M�P Lac�tloa
- � - - - �y� ... � � � � � � � _ _ � ` � � �.. _
, � �;- � r In�a ion Uht►kt `IS �� . Q
J3M � � � •
� � (m�at,jla , � � N! I f � �
� � `;� .t�� r1 r /: � �
�
�
� i t� � � S- , - � �t � � ]2 � �
�, DrN: t=!2]/200�
� 1 � � • . - s( � �: ; ; �'� � , P
i I � � i `� ^ �y i s , ^ ��� P . .
� I + �.,_...tlMi r � y --� - rr-� � �� � i ���i' .
- `. —a- . ^ — -- �� .�.. ..__ . _ a - ..._ . -- -- — --- . - . -�- � .
� � .� 1 � `� � 'i � � i � 1 �
- � _ � � I�ni atr � ,� ___- i Y � � 0 •� 1 2 MdM
�) � //-'� � ` _ I �� � I ` 1 � � � 1 � i � 1
01 ,� I/ u; � '� 0 } ( 27 1 i � Nertcy' ]iw �r�arwafMw �horw o� tlw w� i� rnwNkd JFaw wriun
K ry ��y i ww � � � �9 fmly�e[�Cawih � � �' • � � A � A � wMr�rr �wf u awly�a> ro co�uoN �vbn. T)r C!q• maliv �o rlww�
I L� 2 �"' 3 ' + �,�6 f R's�rr t1H�rtct �. � � � Z�.+$ ��nsvwtaa alau els marsRy �r n�+rntY of 11W w� ewal
�� � a�nsdy �riaiwr IaMhfr JM nfu►r w�dawrarldni �n q� m�knfr.
� � � � � u�nnm r2 � _ cp�, ty.��> � � I'�. To nqA.. �cs++�� c.�� �r q4 u/a�o�► re�.y. [drw...q
$ i ��^ � � � 'H•�cf �i.�rr� � � lln.rhy�n�Ar�senR/k►t�wr�N1'/war�(300JO:!•J000
� � �UrSi��M IS I �,_ -'�
' ` -� `' � , � '1 � � �_ � .. � � � n.a,.�.ia.nry.r}aw�'.M.�M M.�.�n�sr
,�, w � _ _ � _ � � r.s�. I l!r!+� � L�' �1.. . . - — �
`�-- I �
-� : ,� Map4.3
, . , '� � � � �
--�� k . �� .
�� _ _ _� .�, � -_= _ - � ' �� ; : r �,,� i Parks & Recreation
i ' ''
.., z � ` ^ _ � � , ,
� w.l.'� ', � � _ � ; ��-' �� �
•d� � , -� �.. �i �
� �-` � �-. I � � I��.r_I r � �
j' i �'i,_.
City of �� • _ _ _ _;_l1,_, � �.♦ � �' �� ir. � �� y — I
S alcane ' ��� •---�• W �,, �-: � �'� _ � Com.eilyArt
r $wl.ii� Ir4 . �- r i ��� �� � . ~�'-� • A � � � Y�.�r.Y
l ����c A.� I • �� /� 4 - C�/�i�1�YYYi�Y
�Mr�rW. � i �l� • - r'i ` .. j -- -
K�L� - lM� �dr ��C3 + 1 r -�•• •• • � --��� - _i _ _ .. .. �' _ - �T/�
A�� � k � •- . Y 1 �' - .
t . - .1r► n� 1���i : � �� 1 ��tiii_ ji►`r � - �NCli��r��
�M� f • illHd �x— !�! _ ',:� -+� � .
' c�. �! ' 1 '� iE±. . : _ i� • _, g �.
�� � j_j__"�.J_ i - �y. _ `1,, 1- �/�KOt��
�1 � ..� �K {" �'��r
�t s • � }� � � L.!
- M . `l� � �{I� Q�.� V�
h'!k ! }� {��t I � � �M�f • / �. �� :, -� I � � +_ _ ' � � �..�1...�Jru�
L ', _ - .., . �w�.r�.....
p � s►• I -t� :':�- ` _-_. w - �-
� g�"-"' 1.. r� w�f�r % � � -'t�. rw.� �� I i' Sl �C = ' CI�'�� L--' ��r1fQMi`AIr
_ , � �w.�• ' _ �,�it�rty � wwrfod'ar
•- � { �a .i 1! - - �, fil»�w ui r�. • � � ti1
� � n..,.r � L.A�it
- - � 4 , �' � , Mi�11Y�t/�1 ir R +-p`+ -1'1b' ,n1p
k'r" � ttt{1�Md SyMwll
� �.; l�.+i.i �' I r� I � -
_.
" �' - � - i > I i �- !�- � J _� � �'M
-� � �����E�Tnih
Y-
_ . �, '� +- � � i
µ -._ 1 � � - ' T` � � -�- . . � • � / � � hnP{�a�d h�Js
_ ' I �I - .- ' i ._. - _ j���l�:r � r , tf0� raf�{/
�
.f. y ' - ��h + r C — j • "� '^�
- - - �; �1= � -' - - -1- �' �► m" _ -d�. '��' L_. ��G' ..� t � .nAr % �� • j1 I M lT� � .� �
_ � � �! "�^ -. u '�i �
- C �- e ' U � � � Y�oPad Sp�ei�l Uw MM
� I � . ,��`
�' s
.�� � � _ ��op�+d Cam�r !tk
� �� , `'� �fil� �� ,--- � ---� ' � �..d��
,.- -� , �- -
( , ;, , ; .
� � � , � �3 1._....� _ , Wf' r r�; �' - "_ •• ' -- � �� � r� , ; � � ;- .
� � .
� � 1 '� � i(�., r , �i.Gi� �,�' ''� • . �"� � • � r
� `' , � �[`; i , � � � ?w�, ,.�:1 � �iiA`� _ � r � ; • • i
-�-- • � � � Aii��. - • � .
I , � y l l, i'� lIMI \' _ � `t�" i + aLw � ( � �'3� �� � • • ��
� � " / � A .i. � � � c'F � �.00�I1f�11
'� � � . .♦ •��� `.
� . � '_ ti� � - 1 ._ � i O
" � --'� t �1 , C 2 � I
Y 1------ . � r � D�le l YLYM
. _ � � � .
��. " ��I P
� �� � �� A
ten � '�' � � E .
� — 1 . 1�
�
.,_. � . _ � �� � h\ . � � .
;-�"� , - �
-� _ �— � 1 .. � _ � � o a.s i 2 �u..
�''���' � � . � � �,- - - �� I t . , , ► . . . ,
� [ (��arn�i4 ! / �+ . /
�� - /� _ �..J ` 1VoAK�' lI» uJwtwalaw �h��rn �n Ow w� a a+ryrkd�rw +,ar�nv
�• .- � 't-- � � asrrau an/u rbjru �, nsawr rnuer� 7hc CNyma►n wu dr�s
� � � �}}� l � � •__ \��: c � I �,IGda�irf.�ulirh�wnr�.r,�n.�l���a
Y�
� � . � �a' � ,, � � ' ; J: " � e•+�J '' r °^*rM..r,atk�.�.cu^+,�o�r�..a,K Oovi vi. a
` i� '��—_�,�_.._��' � �-, �' � � � r....�.rrcr..��r+�.v.rf�cr.�.rr�►�+as.n.�r
l 1 1 � 1 � � 1
!' 1 � 1 ; ! 1 1 � o l p � ' � . � 1 � i
1 1
� d � � ' � --' � --= � ---g --- � --- � --- � -- � - � -- Map 4.5
�►uM _-- g ___ ---J--- �__� -- � ---- -�� �.__�_-1-----f-----'- _�_ -�.- _-I� = -�_ _1- _J�l
� -1- -�' �f ---'- --r i- t � � - i � �
� , , � � � � ; � � � ; � � � ' � � Siuic-Year Sewer Projects
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
� � � � � � � ' � � � ' � - - -- � - ---� --� --
�MW�-----•-----�-----L__ _.. " ----'-----•--__�_-__-�---- ----- •- --�--- - �{-- -�- T-
� � � � � � i � � � � � i i
� � � � �` ' � � i � � ' � � i �
� � �� � � i � i � i
i � � � . � � � - � :ule � S� � � � � '~� _4nn.
_.Ii - -- ' J---- �� ---- ' -- "��, K '� .�w�.. ---- ��:• . -__ 1L--
� � ' • tt rt 1
��y nr � � � � _ .. _ ' 1 _ � � �� �� �� �� � • �
� '""'� 't,; u�' `"""' ' ug�
_�a��$Pokane�---- � ' - - � --� �---- - ---•- �-� -- - ---- --- .���--
; � -r - - - - - - - - • F - , � � � � �' -�' - - � � ; � Q G,� �tsoo�. v.u�r �►r
� _
� � �; � � , � � � -- -
' � � � , ,,,,,�,-�'"' � � ! ; � ' �- - � v�e.p ao.�e �,..
� 1 � � .��! ��- � � � � � � � � � � w r� - � � . � �"J' _ .
_ ��-1Nt� • _ - - -� .s� - - - � - r,. lv�►I� v� I��f���00 �,r•.. _ • M , l ' i _ _ . _ � _ ' ..'�* _ � � � A�kaitjpd Anr
' � � , "� • i ' � , �C � ; : �
� � � /,+� �'. ,..... � .rs* � � � ,�..r., p � W�p80�
� ' � ��% � � ��.��_ .� � _ �--"�+�
� :1Fl�„ � � � 1 � � � � � � � -' � " '�'" •..... '�, ' �:INIi �• � r, i,l y _ _ "`y:.- � � " � � � ' 1 �
� � � ; � n ��� �,. � � d �Yar V� Swtn
� � �.r.... o , • '������rw,-r.�r � � � � � 3h Ywr C�#iall�qetw�Nl �Ir
-� I- - - - - � - - - - w�«..•.. .�. � .�. .,.�� � i•»..'..e � ZJ .,.», ...�.... ,� a- �
"�� �! rlt� c rt r 6 Yar QT (2003-3010)
� ....��; • q9 , -p , � � :u�« ,
��` :�n��
, � ,�.,i.� M � '±��' � I M � �.' � ; ,"�, a � : \ "'; t ��� � Ln k e � - � - s.,ne.d
, t '� ; � ; _�r. .�.,�n� � � ' { f � A, ` � � ,w..��=+�.s,�n �� -
i ,�,� 1�
ra �. � .. .. ��w bllt'O�bA
• �r���.�A ' �i��T�:{.� n.��Wr..•.�. _ � a '�
�i p ,,,....._�i�' - .��,!"u � :u,i ' ; cd�.aou
� i f'�l, �
� 4 � � A :in����U1�N ���r... 2D10 �t�l� � � � � . �11�CJfld
� � - � i . � � � yr.. .�� s wr�.�.. z,R.�...... �..� �r-:�. - -
I' . -^ T'ij' ..r �I.t ��,;'f`, _ .�r.�..nlr
���� -� / ��iVw ..! _�N� �
:1� FI
o .���, t i � v�.� ��e�.. �'�•. -�i �.1h� �. • fNY! ~ � 1.
� 1.1� � r
� , �Mi�i _
� `� � 4�1 � 'I rPl,l�,' ' . _F � � _ ' " ('.� L1�y'A� fy�Y. .. _ _ rwi e �
� ; * ; � z� • . �� � � . � t- :ia�w � 1 �
• = r i ! ?fIV� t
� • _ � 1 I
� Uwr� � � '. � � � �arn�
_ I r. ,r, � � � � � - - - - � - - � - _1�' � ' � i - - i.,, , � r.� ', - � � ; - ' 1- � - - , . '
� � � 1 , `�t� y �� ' � I � � �1
i �
, f � 1 � � - � � � � 1
� � � t {.� . • 1 �� 1 � �
1 1 � � 1 ' I f w � _ _ � _ _ ► �I� � � � � � � _2AOl:, _
� � ��� � _ _ _ _ ' „ _ _ _ �� • � � � � J� ' � _ ' ' . _. � :�R�.� , r �.� . ��w .� ' , � �
1 r 1 � 7 � � T � :+nn�•` �^ • 1 � 1 � � 1.001�bA
� 1 � � 1 1 � ��� � � � 1
� 1 � � � � 1 � i 1 �I j � 1 � '� � � t
� 1 � � 1 � 1 � M 1 _ � t _l�i _ _ � t
� � � � ' � ' L � � �� --���� � � �..J�� `:��
_ .1' � 1.:---- + --- __ L ___�1�-__� ---- r_-__.I�� - .w. u:.... - � -t.� ' � --�;- - � - � -
� � � � � 1 �
� � i � � � i , � � � � � � i
i � � � � � � � � � � . � i � � � i WM' IYlll�
� 1 � � ' � ' _ � � � - '--------�-�---- �__--i----'' p
J -'� , . � � � � � , � A .
� � � � � � � , • � � � � � � ,
i � � � � � i .
� � i � � � � � �1 � � :G11 • ' ' � � � . � � �
� 1 � � •
� � � t � ! � 1 . ____t_-__ � .__1____ � ____�___J�PP
� �--- �-�---'�- � �': -- � �--- � ��- � � � � 0 US 1 2163�
i T � � � � � �' ' � � � � . � � i l . , , � . . �
� � , • � � � � � ' � � � �
� � � � � � ' � � � � � � � � � 1K,ncv Thr u�rwt+an iAorw un Mw � N nf�ukd/ua mrrean
i •
� � � � � i ` - r � � � � � � � � i
� � � , � � �nMit� rrsl n nJ�Irl Ar esatW rn�aiwn. TM Cl y inaku nu rArwa
� � � � � � `y . � : (27'� ' - ° $ d $ � ar tw,�+i+rs �wr thr ss++nq� a► e�n�cY �/ MV we' is�d
� s � �' � � ' � : ;^ � § � i �Pi*nlya�fawr fMlaAryJMsnwirsdcr�w�wr�nwc�kMrr
-�4 --�---- ----$---- �;-----°� �� ---- ----r S` rt+ra�lnwecewacrtn�MU�Y+AroRp.�rSpts.wruteRr.ra.nrwi{v
� ' � - - � - � � - � � � - - � � � � � i � � i � i � � � i []nrfqrniwl DqMVts�tnt DMswn njP4wn�ry4 rJOD1971
� � � � i � � � � � � � � � � i � � � i � n.r.� .1 iw ctif .� 4r... v+�. trr.rb 0�+.�..� ow«...+
, � , � i � � � � i
a er - a u ra
.
nv�ronmen
� ��� �. �- ,- �
, �
.
: ,, R : � .
.
- � I : 1
�- , -
,� '�"' �, , n � ; _
, �.��; .--�'�
� � �' ��
� ---- - -.�..1..�� , � �
; f '�I�i.'�i11i� i; _
�. ���! [:iMr�
- L'"� � � � � -' ; •L�,,..J•: � _�'!!'L� � _ _ '^ .rC
.ri� _ �' .� ��';� _ � � • f
_ Sr �' � , �1 ,�
.` � I .� � ~ . � i��`
� � '.i. ::.JIA
��# : � .F ' f - � .. �� - - - �
�/� ��:�� 7' - .� ►-
s � r �±, - � _ � ��
.�!r:: �I�� � �f?'�77� �� �w � �•r � ,�
� •, �� .��.s'''���. , � �t i - -�,�_^,�� . 1 ^ "':I �� � � _
, •'� �� � � ��r��� I � . A • 1 _ _ Y. ��
' i� � rii . � -J . ' T"^' � �fl �
. � " } = I� --.l�� �1L ! •w�.cK--.. `,,� ,r �e� �
' � � ` � .� ����rt�f��� �. �� � � �
�'-;. � 4�: � !��iA�'." !�}1�i'��Iri�ti � I� r , .��..�
, • �u.�■��■i1�..r:�,.s.r .�i �7�� ._..,i� �_ �`
` ;�'�•� -- � � ��� �. � � �
� ��• r�� '' ��r' � �� 5 l��i/ � ..
� � r �. �,,� ` 1fii. - � � �_ � .�i
� " � ` .. r :r�� ' . i: ,
J �� ! �' i. � � .
�A.� �.� � ....�...►:. r....:�. - _ , .
� �� • k ° , `j•=,� - � '- i� �� a �����.1', II�N �. ���.
' � r:� 'r�! � �ii� -;���i� � 1� - �
15i '� '' � i�.'�' + '1 ' _
� , �` ,
• '�� i' :,4` - �.��f_ ���w1i,,�1 Yre.r.lu.-.� ``�y� /. �
� T � '� '�� '��� ��Y 1 � , �� F h� �.
/ �� �rY.yt�_ , ♦ f_�ls,J■
ti �{����� w�•�� t,.
g i'i.�`�7 r .�_ .
, .f�.
� � - y%:. ►.
. - ;� � ._�' ��� �i -
� � ' � �`
�� F• , �r _: ;
�' ' ''• r� i �t� �
`' � - �
/� _� ` � �;� •
, �,` �
� �� �.,. �
� � � � N
— ..,. �
' � � .�
� �
� ' ~� � —� '�•
� , � '
� I
.���� � �, �ii
��7�1r _ L����► ...� �� . . �� •
' ` r�
_ ,.
.� . , ; �==�,'� , ' �- �� � Ma 8.3
..� t ��� � � j � � ., p
� '-' � �.�."`"`=-- `�� ' � �� Fish & Wildlife Habitat
� j � � '' ,t � , - -r � � �
-tl � - - �' , , ',' - - ..r � �. �//
� r , � � s �[` 1 `_ " t,, ;tr.- , � ,
� /� � � � ° ' - � . � � 1 _! - 3 _ " �L �
( t� � $w��_� , ��f l 1 1 _ ��',T 1
�� � / ■. .,.,� .. ' i .� �� , � � � "Y � �_, _ - iyi ' I w t y � �
� �.'°� - - F �.� , �
f � ; �� _ ' � �
.?` —,��; i �� _ --��, - — `1 �, - � ` � ���
� �,__ I �
L� ' � ` �ry - �� " _ ' ` � �'� " • " G � ! � J Cl� O� �O�Y �� �"^�"�7
�Z .
—i �t' _ —
��
r .
I_ _ .1�wlApwNRh rI � �(� I J � � � ._ft1#�� \ � Tr ; ►� �1 � �}Y�f
r� — • �. t1'w�,�� "' '.'_� � � ..M'��2!_.. 1 11 r•�. _y_— ��_LL{
- � - -�+F,}"+i „' �, � % �� 'It,��.r..' � Wk�1rT�il�dDwr
M "„4° F � ` �;
,.. •
f • � - - � �' ', . "' ' . � `� '�",� % I �� � � Aloor
I "i � f `'` �k !l�biw
� -- - �: , , _ ��` � _ ` . r», .�. i - '•• i ��:1 , _ u,M waral ov.. Sp.�.
g`]f4''� � l - �! .��"r ._ 1
i ��� j�' l' 1- d...' i �i � S) � -�yPYLLYI 7.MN
_ �� ((�� ��
' � i �{ _ {-A- L�.nfS4..w�= �' 1
1; � � �` � w�.�
� \ ' � !-
' , _ _ �
- " i ' ±+± :- �"'r'� _ - - - •
� �n r � . � ; — _ � , � _ � u�e.a c�as M..
N_. � �- -
� � �i � � w�K dtldl�t
� �
.«.+�..« - { 1- � �' .( .
- � _� ,—�� — I _ .
+ _ _ �- -1 � � -� = ���=-�- —�' — 1 " ^ � �� 'L1, ' . ��_ �_ . ` DNR Streaa '�'pe
- - ��,.-.1: � � - . /� ,.C " .�.
� _ _ /r '. -_ ��`� � .. �I - . � �� .:IJaI• /� t Nn J M .•, � — ; � l`�/ � .IYYS�
1 �
� a
t � �- / - - - - � ' (� Puh N.biw
� _ J :� i _ ~�-!! l ��� � ` � � /
,: � t , j � � '
� � � ' � ::��: � �►. i� i � � ,1 � 1 -� 77� � - ' -- � i r � �00�� ��Illif
� a , �� /� � I • _ ' �, � (U) [Inbfowa
, � �� ' 1 fi - - �' 1 ~ y � f ' `�
���, , � 1 -� �,; � � � ,
.1 I � � ��_��.�(Y 1 ' _ °' � ' �-` _- � e � 1' S � �� ' � �� - • �1
� � : i.. �� / � _ '�+� 1 R � 1 � , ' � �i.
� � �/ =- . � -,
� , . �rJ J _ � t i , `` �� , - 1 �
� � /�/ / /�J� � � L LOCMIDO
� � � �/ ' /' _ 1U � �- � � — — �
� /� � i'—
,� j'
1 ��/ / �/� '. . F + i _ � ��j� ' _— " — _
! 11 / � J J �' 1 1.
. - .// r � �.� �J //� � t . - ' •s'1` . . . u � . . � . -- � ' - �
� � ,/ ����/ / / J / . �- ti- i `� � ' ' + � � , DNa13lJ��/i01�
• . J / f� �� r !' ~ � • _ i� 1 � �P , y�f, ,,,,, � � � �
/ / ♦ : _ _ � � t .. '
�� % / �l ��� � '.r. ;�� u.; ' '- �. - • � , , � �
` •!L-� �!�/ � '� '� . I :. h ;: _ `�„,t �. 'C � � � // ' °' � � i 'ti � t .;k�� '�"c�
_I" .,,�, r �� ��.��. _ - - _ ' / • f !J 1� . � - . ' � i � . Z � _ _ _
-.�, y ;�,+ _/ •�� � /�r ��� . � � • ,, �` ��I ...-,� �i� i # �` �
`'q '• 1'" � /'/�( 1 � ,f � , ��J''i ,/ _ . - �-a t,Y� � f ,� /1/ � � / + � ;� 0 0 ! I 2 ►�W�
,���,���'r�/ � / / J 1 _ ' � `/// � /.`J_ �, _ i , ��.,� � / �r `� .. '� � } 1 � . , , � . . . �
1 ( � J. ;�b I / �I//� , Ir i ' �� / .�� 'I�..I.' �� � �i � � /:' ` � � , � '�
, • � � ' �, f ; •. i 1 � � f � ` / .�/ / . ,� � • � � / � / � , s / / .'vtlo 11M 4�(ara�rx� �d�orw a� Ihtr � it trynArdAoR wtwn
�} ,l� ^ ;, . r,�. ., -. �� /�� � � / � R � ,, ,aw wrlir e�ct r esrWr mairr� Tfr ('Ip sbi nn cla�av
I � �v� ��!��• ��!����•r' � •f /� / `, �� ':� J/ �� '�`/ / ���,- - i //, � .�nNes��tNrninnsy�r�nrwryofdurrpad
•,41 , k' � � � '^�' .e�, '`!%5�' � � / � � �� � � j 1 ^. � �/ � / ,� :,�vrn,kJu'l�an hul+Myki+tt+wtadnrurwu rn itrarM��.
� f' � �• �/� / /��� y ' J � . //�// , ��,, � // `/ � , � •' nr{6r� n'twwY �M Ih► ntl' 4lS�+�n► dfA Caw�n�aA
� .' ': � �v� � �` / � � /�'J i" �� l /� % / ! / / -i • / ��� / � . � : walrpwww(k�we�, Dwluun �ltluwi� lSAYI V:!-lQDO
. � � �- _ �•+., - � •/' �' � -� ♦ // ���� /F t ` / � / // ��� , r
///�� I / � �, I ' /� " +� �1r UI� J �/.� ii. �h 1�� �
.._ _ /` � r r � i '
ClTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin, report � pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 09-009, Official Zoning map amendments
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A (Growth Ma�agement Act)
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 14, 2009, Council deliberated on comprehensive plan
amendments CPA-01-09 through CPA-08-09.
BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs
from November 2 to November 1 of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications
received prior to the November 1 deadline in (ate winter/early spring of the following year, with a
recommendation to City Council in late spring/early summer.
All parts of the Comprehensive Plan (maps and text} can be amended during the annual cycle. The
"ommunity Development Department received one site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment; city
iaff initiated three site-spec�c Comprehensive Plan map amendments. Sites that are approved for a
Comprehensive Plan Map amendment automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the
new Comprehensive Plan Map designation.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan map amendment proposals
are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, maps, and letters
submitted to date ta assist the City Council's review.
The Spokane Valley Planning ComrY�ission conducted a public hearing on March 12, 2009, to consider
proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made
recommendations on CPA-02-09 through CPA-04-09. Further research was requested on CPA-01-09. On
March 26, 2009, the Planning Commission held a hearing and made recommendations on CPA-01-09.
OPTIONS: Adopt Ordinance 09-009; remand to Planning Commission for further consideration; or conduct a
public hearing on proposed deviations from the Planning Commission's recommendation.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Move to adopt Ordinance 09-009
STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior
Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance
1 of 1
1
1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOK:ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 09-009
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE Vt�iLLEY, SPOI�:ANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE 07-015 WHICH ADOPTED THE ,
QFFICIAL ZONING MAP; AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATT`ERS '
PROPERLY RELATING T'HERETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted Land Use_plans and reguladons as set
forth in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) and the City of Spokane Valley Zoning
Map through Ordinance No. 07-015; and
';� ,
W�-IEREAS, the Washington State Growth ' Management Act (GMA) allows
comprehensive plans to be amended annually (RCW 36.70A130); and �;;
W�REAS, amendments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan may be
initiated by the Planning Commission (Commission), .;the City� Council (Council) or by the '
Community Development Director based on citizen 'requests or when changed cond.itions
warrant adjustments; and �;,, , ' �,�,
;
WHEREAS, the GMA requires ` comprehensive plans ,, to be implemented with
development regulations, including the zoning of '_;,property consistent with land use map
designations; and � , '
'' ; ;'- ''�
. .., �'
�'
W�-IEREAS, zone changes �under consideration with the annual Comprehensive Plan
amendments are to .be considered `as area-wide rezones pursuant to 17.80.140 of the SVMC; and
� � . ;,
;
W��REAS, consistent �vith the GMA� � City of Spokane Valley adopted Public
Parkicipation Guidelines to direct the public involvement process for adopting and amending
comprehensive plans�and `area-wide rezones; and
_; � .
WHEFtEAS, the Spokane Valley Municipal Code provides that amendment applications
shall be received until Novembgr 1 of each year; and '
. , �„
WEiEREAS; applications were submitted by the applicant, owner or by City staff to
amend the Comprehensiye Plan and Zoning Map for the purpose of beneficiaily using the
property described herein; and
WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted an environmental
review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the proposed amendments; and
VV;E�REAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued a Detennination
of Nonsignificance (DNS) on December 19, 2008 for the proposals, published the DNS in the
Valley News Herald on December 19, 2408, posted the DNS on the sites and mailed the DNS to
all affected public agencies; and
Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic
Development was notified on February 27, 2009 pursuant to RCW 36.?OA.106 providing a 6-day
notice of intent to adopt amendments to the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and
VVHEREAS, the Commission conducted a briefing on February 26, 2009, to review the
proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, notice of the Comnussion public hearing was published in the Valley News
Herald on February 20, 2009; and �� �
,
. ,;,
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2009, notice of the Commission hearing was mailed to all
property owners v��ithin 400 feet of the subject property ; and
WHEREAS, notice of the hearing was posted on the subject properties; and
,
WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing on March � 12, 2009 at which
time the Commission received evidence, iaformation, public �estimony and a staff report and
recommendation; and � � � � �
WHEREAS, the Commission, at the conclusion of the public hearing and af�er
deliberating on the proposed amendments and information presented during the course of the
hearing developed recommendations on site=specific map amend.ments� CPA-02-09 through
CPA-04-09. Further research wns requestec� An site-specific map amendment CPA-01-09 and
CPA-OS-09. The Commission requested m.inor changes to t�le Public/Quasi-Public provisions in
CPA-OS-09. The Commission continued the public hearing to March 26, 2009 for CPA-01-09
and CPA-OS-09; and � . � � , .
WHEREAS, the Commission deliberated on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09 on March 26,
2009; the Commission recommended appro.val of a11 amendment proposals; and
WHEREAS, on;I�7arch 31; 2009, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and
, , �
WHFREAS, on April 14, 2009, Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the
proposed aniendment; and `�,; ; �
I :.
WHEI�EAS, on May� 12, 2009, Council considered a second ordinance reading at which
time Couneil approved �`7itten findings of fact setti.ng forth their basis for recommending
approval of the propos'eci amendments.
NOW, T��EREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as
follows:
Seehon 1. se. The purpose of this Ordi.nance is to amend the Official Zoning
Map adopted through Ordinance No. 07-015 in order to permit the property described herein to
be used in a matter consistent with the same.
Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 2 of 6
i
c' n 2. Find' . The City Council acicnowledges that the Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the application and recommends
approval of the amendment to the Zoning maps. The City Council hereby adopts the findi.ngs of
the Comnussion, specifically that:
ection 2. Findin s. The City Council aclrnowledges that the Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hearing on the application and recommends
approval of the amendments to the Zoning Map and tex� The City Council hereby adopts the
findings of the Commission, specifically that:
1. Notice for the groposed amendments was placed in �he Spokane `'alley News Herald on '
February 20, 2009 and each site was posted with a"Notice of Public Hearing" sign, with a
description of the proposal. �
2. Individual notice of the map amendment progosals was mailed to all property owners within 400
feet of each af�ected site. ' '
3. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21C) environmental checklists
were required for each proposed comprehensive plan map and text a.mendmen� :
4. Staffreviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold�determination was made for each
comprehensive plan amendment request. Determ.i.nations,�of Non-significance (DNS) were .
issued for the reyuested comprehensiye plan arnendments �on �December 19, 2008.
5. The DNS's were published in the city's of�icial newspaper on`December 19, 2008 consistent
with the City of Spokane Valley Enviro �nment�il ��rdinance. �
6. The Spokane Valley Planning Convnission conducted a public,_h'earing on March 12, 2009, to
consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public testunony, the Commission made
recommendations on CPA=02-09 thru CPA=04-09 and e�ccluding CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09.
7. The Commission co�tinued the public hearing for CPA-O 1-09 and CPA-OS-09 to March 26,
2009. � � � .
8. On March 26, 2009, the. Comrii,ission made recommendations on CPA-01-09 and CPA-OS-09.
9. The planning goals of the Growth' Manageinent Act (GMA.) were considered and the
�
proposed a�nendments are consistent with the GMA.
10. The goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan were considered and the
propcised amendtncnts are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
11. The proposed zoning designations are consistent with the current use of the properties. I
12. Findings were made and factors were considered to ensure compliance with approval criteria
contained in Section 17.80.140 H. (Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide rezones)
of the Spokane Valley 11�unicipal Code (SVMG�.
13. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map and text amendments will not adversely affect the
public's general healtii, saf�ty, and welfare.
ection 3. Pro rt. The properties subject to this Ordinance are described in
Attachment "A."
Section . �Vlap Amend.ments. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073, the City of Spokane
Valley Zoning Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 07-015, is hereby amended as set forth in
Attachment "A." The Zoning map amendments are generally described as follows:
Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 3 of 6
1
�
�Vian Amendm ents
File No. CPA-01-09:
Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change the designation
on parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051, 45242.9056 and
45242.905? from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential.
Appllcant: Ben Goodmansen, Whipple Consulting Engiaeers; 2528 North Sullivan Road; Spokane
Valley, WA 99216 .
Amendment Location: Parcels 45242.9032, 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242:9036, 45242.9050,
45242.9051, 45242.9056 and 45242.9057; located on the south side of 4�' Avenue batween Sullivan Road
and Conklin Road; further located in the south half of the northwest quarter of Section 24, Township 25 I
North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokan� County, Washington.
Council Decision: Change Parcels 45242.9033, 45242.9035, 45242.9036, 45242.9050, 45242.9051,
45242.9056 and 45242.9D57 to Multi-family Hig6 Densit�• �tesideatial District (MF-2). Change
Parcel 45242.9032 to Multi-family Medium Density Residential District (NIF'-1).
, � � � .•
File No. CPA ��' � . �
ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: City initiated site specific Comprahensive Plan map amendmant
on parcels 45242.1002 and 45242.1006 from High Density Resideritial (HDR) to Neighborhood
Commercial (NC). ,-
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E,'Spra�ue Ave, Ste 106; Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Loeation: The northeast corne'r'.of 4`' Avc;nue and Sullivan Road, parcels 45242.1002 and
45242.1006, addrassed as 315 and 325 South Sullivan Road; further located in the NW'/4 of the NW'/4 of
Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, , Spokane County, �Vashington.
Counsel Decision: Change to ; Neighborhood �Commercial, (NC)
File No. CPA-03-09: '
Application/Description of Proposal: � Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Office (0) to
Commnnity Commercial (CC) �on six'(� parcels composing approximately 3.5 acres of land.
Applieant: City of Spokane Valley, �11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
4mendment Location: The proposal is located betw�een Mullan Road and Argonne Raad from the
north side�of IIoone Avenue to the south side of Sinto Avenue; specifically located in the SE'/4 of Section
17, Tow 25 North, Range `44, East �Villamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington
Council Decisioa: Change to Community Commercial (C)
;
File No. CPA-04=09
Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment to change from
Community Commer'cial (CC) to Low Density Residential (LDR) on approximatety .47 acres of land.
Applicant: City of Spokane Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: �� The proposal is located on St Charles Road, approximately 780 feet north of
Sprague Avenue on the east side of Progress Road; specifically located in the SE %4 of Se�tion 14,
Tovmship 25 North, Range 44 Fast Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington.
Council Decisioa: Change to Single-family Residential Urbaa District (R-4)
File No. CPA-OS-09:
I
I
Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 4 of 6
Application/Descr�ption of Proposal: A City initiated text amendment to Chapter 2— Land Use. The
amendment also evaluates all properties designated public/quasi-public and proposes an appropriate laad
use designation and zone based on the predominant land use surrounding the property.
Applicant: City of Spokans Valley, 11707 E Sprague Ave, Ste 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Amendment Location: Text amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use will have city-wide unplications.
Amendments to Public/Quasi-Public properties are located throughout the city.
Couacil Decision: Adopt Teit amendments to Chapter 2— Land Use; eliminate the
Commnnity Facility (C� zoni.ng designation and change to zoning designations consistent
wfth surrounding designations.
.,-,; � �
Sectioa 5. 2.o.ning Map/Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW '35A.63.100, for the
purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and gi��e affect to the Comprehensive
Plan the City hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the � City as � set forth in Attachment
����
�
,�.
., .
ection 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To, .the e�rtent that any provisian of the SVMC,
or any other law, iule or regulation referenced ,�.n .the attached _ Zoning Map(s) is .necessary or
convenient to establish the validity, enforceabilifiy or interpretation of the Zoning Map(s), then
such provision of the SVMC, or other law, rule or regulation �is hereby adopted by reference.
ection 7. Map - Copies on .� File-Administrative Action. The Zoning Map is
maintained in the offce of the City Clerk as well as the City Depa,rtment of Community
Development. The City Manager or designee, follo�ving ado�,ption of this Ordinance, is
authorized to modify the Zoning Map in a mainner consistent w�ith �us Ordinance.
Sectioa 8. Liabili �. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the
responsibility for compliance with �'the provisions, of this ordinance shall rest with the permit
applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its��rovisions are adopted with the express intent
to protect the health, safety, an� `��elf�re of t��e general public and are not intended to protect any
particular class of individuals or organizations. �` �
Section 9. Severabilifiv. If any, section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
shall' be � held to be invalid or tuiconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ord.inance.
�
Section 10. ,,Effective Date. Thi.s Qrdinance shall be in full force and effect five (5)
days af�er publication of �this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the o�cial newspaper of the
City of Spokane Valley.as pr�vided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this day of May 2009
�
Mayor, Richard Munson '
ATTEST:
Ordinance 09-009 Zoning Map Changes Page 5 of 6
i
City Clerk, Christine Bainbrid�e
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City Attorney ,,�-��
1 = -
:I.
Date of Publication: =
:,
,
t�C� 1
. ' ` � ' '��5
Effective Date: _ ` ` �!
,, i �,.: �� �: _:,
. i ' ' 1„ �.+.� xr �
��.�;
� . �-1 `��'��`� _ - ._�
� � . t♦ ` ` -/,� �.� .
i. .
�i. '
"' i
�1 ;
� i i.
. '•�-�� �t�.
�.� ..i:;
�!��'*-! f!�;,`•:�_ •, ��rl,!-r- . r' .� ,
1 �'•� N1 � '�j,�;��;;� 1
''��,� ,� �j?�:�''';,`if' ,.' ti.
����:r � � t .
,� .T!'•iY•. . 1�>-i�✓.,,. �-
�t _�. .��ft.?f.j
. . � , - - . � ~L �' � `'y
; ��:' I _
.' � f � i
�� � -:�::�-��•? �'�
. � - �t •�•' ' �7� ,���'� �
. . � ! , �'� � '. . i'' .-j .
. .!
' �;}�� a!I` .� ti Y� ' . ..
F . i � 1 ��! ��n � � 1 { ,
. �y'�..�t� -. . . . i''
� �:v�7•�;h�" -: ' W� Y �;4 •-
.� . ; ` .
�l� :I. . 1�` \
; l�' , . v��' :
�'�> +� _
�. ,4� .
. , �. ��, � h '.�.;� - . '
�'
1'I �
� :; •., �)
� ,
�'; I
���' : .
,�.�
'Ij,. ,��;�:
:' � _ ''.
, .
'� �, `
� y` ,
�
Ordinance 09-009 Zaning Map Changes Page 6 of 6
ac men
� • • .�
�= � _;.
' ; � � ::: ++�Li3e3�
. ....,:.''�,.... ` ' • �� � '- - ".
i���i�-►iE:'i�sin Z�� ►i� i4• .-
� .. .
,,,• � � . �� - � ...��. ,..
�� '
� . I
- . �
- O � �,
,� ,. �/� r , I I 1
� ■�1� % - .� � __ _ - ,. ��
— • a � �,.L� �?�
• � /�� ,'��/ I,� � ,,,, �
/ /
� /
/ � /
• � / / / �� _ ,'
■ _ / � %/ �
� � /
� / �� �I �
� / / / _ ,.
, f / / . � �� . �
� / �
i � // � . - �
� % � // � � ,.
� / ♦
■■ � � / / � /
/ �
� � / / / 111
■ � �
� / �
/�
i / / .
■■ � // ,i ,
. ,� , i r�����►
� � �
� . �� �
�■ �
♦
. ♦
� ♦
�
♦♦
� .. ♦♦
� _ -- ► •
r _
�
.� ♦
...
„. ,
.�
� � � � � � . � �
���
� �- � � �..��� ��� �� _ � ,
_ _ _ �.
� .� i. i�. �. ��� � .i � . i �. � � �, � � i �i� � �
_ _
'• 1 I' � :il' �� �� 'I I 'I 'i � 'I 'I �
� �� ��• 'I '�� 'I � ' �-•� •� �� � 1 '�� t�
����� � 1• • �� •► 1•�� ���� 'I �• t'��'� ��� 1' � II' �:. ��: �� ' � '
�• � •� � i �� t �
� � • .�
- - - - -- - - -� -- - - .- ____ - - - -- - -- .
• � f, ���[�1�_
�. _._.
� .i•. . . _.' . a'f: s( __ �.� ���+��G! - �y " s � • • • ♦' _ -- � 1A .1 .I7i•�is• �a.�•i. �uj�;�• ►� � ••r 1��
� ♦♦ •�...: .�.
� �r•�y � -
�
�
` -�i_��i��=i�� �' ` :�s�' J
.. ••� r... �.�.�
..`j., �1����..:.�...�
�:,._.3:-...;. .
I� �� � ��
� ��'.
�
�� - 1'Y �� - ►rs: ' T! �
\ :: . •:.' ' .
i _ •�� •�••1.�+4�!••��� •�.i. ..�..r��� ��� "-�+��,1.�; �e
� � " � �
���f.�(•�_Y►�f. � �'s �s i�I�'i�� .iL�� �� �
` K=y��}1C��.. �N!'�Ii
���1�'5�:1�/ ��M i��i.. . '.�`i
— - '___..—___ . ._�—__ _'_� — -_ ,-_ __— .__— — . —
��� % - - - ,
��1 . , � . . .
i _ �.� -
��� �� ■ _
� � . � � � �
_- . � r
�� �� , / �
�� � ���!/
� � ��1� • �
: ■ ■ % ��
�.
. �
� � % �_
� i � �/
�. � . � , � � 1
� � � � ■�� . �
. - � � � �i
� � . ���
;� � � � 1
_ , . ■■ . �r����r�
� ,
�
�■ - ■■ / i
�� � ,.
,� � �
�- _
�= � �
i -
�� � �
��
�■. ■ ■ �
., ,
�
�■
■��
� � ��
� �.
� � � �����
�
.
■�����r �
� _
� � � �� .., ,,,�. ,. , , .i�i ' �i ��:� �:; �i: ii
� i �i :��
i i 1 ' � ; � � • � � i � � i �
� i i � i � 1 • • i � n • i 1 • � � � i • i
� — - - — — - -
� • � .�
� �J�f� • � _ �� �!•\�.M��Y _ � '•••••_-. _ .'-�..•. _ •.,... • :':•- : • .. � '� :�•�..-•� ,-
... . .... . ....� ' . .... ..�� . .. ' .,�
• I���_ �! '�' ' •_ S{��y - ��r• _ �'� _
• i�i1�r\ �
I
I
;�l♦ ��Y�� •1i• ♦i• � •• lfa� ��H� . .�_— •��til �.� fi
���• •�a .�w •�• .�• :�
/ �� �� j �����' �/i • '
/// /// � �
/ //� // �
/ � !// �/� , �
/� /. //� //i
/i �/� //� .
// - //� //i
!/� //� .
�� /// //i
/� !/� //�
/ //� ///�
/ !/� // .
� / � /�� //�
� i// // .
� ,/��� //j�ji
����� ;�///���///��
': , , % i%j��%%%�j�i
� � � / , // /i
i
� i// //
i ' ' ;/� j �/%�f j/%i
�///////%�_ :��%�1-'r� �%•�� �
� !�jj%//���/
%��///%��j�i �
� �� / %�%���i
�• , //
� % %%�jji�%�j�i
��i�,i�/�/ %�' � �
� !���%������%i ��
%�//�/��///� ��
/J/�j�j//� i ��
�i,�/ r,,,�// //
, iii i� //
i/�j/,�i��i/� %�
��j//�/�///i % %
:,., ;
� /
�
� �
/ .
� �
/
�
, � �
�
/ � � %
, � % %
� / /
/
� /
/
/
% / ,
/ / �
/ �
/ �
/ /
___ _ /
_____��_ _� , /
� +. _,_� /���� /
� � i � i i
% � i %%
� i %/
/ � %�
% /� /�
�ra�t ..
�/ � �
// / /
// /
— �� - - � �
— —--, ——
' • I I'
..� �: ��' i' �t� �'�'� ' �: i �:�. � i' �i
t � � . � . - -
� � 1 � i � � � � � � � � i � �
� ��� � 1• • ����•� 1.� .� - -
� � � .�
�
— — — -�- - � ----- --,
/
/
�
. �
�
_� �:: . � : ::.-... .. ::
... :: � � � -
.��_�:. .�-- . ...: --- � :,
.. . . .. .., . � -- � ..
.. _ . . • ..
.
.. .
. .
.. .._
. ..
. ....
.. .
.
. .
.. .
.
. .
. . ...
.:� .._ -.::_-. - ;,
-__ :. .....:.:::.':: .._ ={
� ..:. . � .. ::
:-::':.� .:-. - :: :�
- � ..�
- ..
... - :..
.
- ..
. ..
' I I ' . , . .: ':�
e..,....r- + ... .: ...::.:: �:..::-. '�
� ::: .. . . .: : : � : : � - . ::��
- � ...�-=�: � : ::. � :... . ::
` � � - .'..: ..�::���:� = _. ::. =;�
� �� � .:. .. .. ......
_ _.=-:::= . ..
� f ;� :: :;::;; ��.:....;:: �.. �� ::;:
•: :..:�• , . :;�:::::::.. �=:::.:• �
� 2 � r � . } • i • L '. �►.: •�J •....'.F.si� �
— w! � '.7J�f•.�?"+�"��r��aTt. - �• l..r.•1.•.�s:T :'�
•Nifi«aa _ ..�•...•�.r��..�..�.:
.�.���. y�� ` •.. R �I I����.��.�. ��e���ii:::•���'
\ •��_..� � �����a�i:r'+il.�ils��.i7��'.�i��i��'��:-��• .,�is�171.
\ . • � � •• • ` �..`,M1i:ia s��� - . ' r
• i •• �� s� •�• ���• �. r.�• . .. . . •Lj��
•t• •�. •�' _ . .. ... '
, ' _• • • . . .� . . ' . . .......• •.... .� .' „ • .... . • 'N
�...� . ... • - � . ' . • " . _ .• � . • �,�.��.. • � � . " ' . .. •�
�i� .�. ��.�'.. ��� - "'•:' .._ " " -
•�• •�.....�.�...-.� •�ti "
•i�i.��...��• •. .��...-... •M�. �� �!. .'I:�i\':,�•�
•�..�.'�:�i�'��- •��.... .�.....•..'.... ���
•.�• • ������•��� - ���r..� •.♦ •�i• •��l����lV������ ��a��i• S1 .�I•
•�:�'a���.����1�����i •1���• � •♦ •::�1��1'�i� �� ril������11.1p�i�����• •���� •1•
:���• �:� • '�• • •����1�1�i►������iilNlY����i�����/• � • "�����•
•�• ��• •r�����Iii��l�. •' •�1��������.. ���i✓��'��
, •1� ♦�• ♦� •H�������• •���ilf1� •���������•
Y• . •���-������• •�� ���i���� ���I1�� �'�• YI. •�� ,
. �� •������:i'�I'.��� � •����'�i��� .� �
. _ . . . ,. •• • ....., - .. .. ...-: •t
•�• •�• ���� •�• •�• •��.
•������• �.*� •��• r � •�t •��•
•N�• • }�'1�• ��^ ..����� •V� - - ���������
.}�i:��• •es...:�::k: . •.�'. y► � sf.t��lf�ii.. ?.: V , Sr'lyVff - } 'y U � . .�a• ..'e►*s�.��. �1 ..a�..�: •.4!1.L.:
1i�...v..rwK �I y� ��`'� ►H ,._�Y . _ ��� : f ���� •� � •ei• . �iN2��:�sa .�i.;.:i.•�..►:
�� U N •��i• • 4 ' 1 ' � �r��jr�M� J�' �. • : .� �y�'� j iM • 'sy��'F��1 'H����w7��� I•.:t._ � ♦'1 �' .. •�...�•.�: �• •
(� �Y� 7 i��N ♦� ..-.�...���w����l/j��
\\ �lS�NI'l��i-+�►. • Y����fj � [) .sr' _��• f�� �.• R�7►Y►i�7f�• • •�� tr���• �.
•M�• �. �� ♦��}! � �� ♦� ��! � �/ % +��ilyl��,a- 1 y�� �[a . •f ♦• �I •��r�i��� �.1� •\'1��
��� � \ ► ���:� ' �yy"�.���� � •iA��� ' � 'yl �Y" �~ i��y� ��� !e� • � • - .
1! ���r:i •��r s�i s� � EV •�wi ��t� ini� �� •a�►� f . •��r •i .� � .....:•.��.1'�r. • �.� .
.�. . ��1����� 1 1 � rf}Yµr l.f. �R� •Y ! l , � 1 '��il►•I�i�1).� �• 1 �.fi��'r� � �..u• ►.�• 1�_ I►'l
\ . ♦f�J��. � ;Y.�I� .�i♦ ��'�'�}� � �• ���f ���,e�r ! ♦ •T - •���►1itr M� f� �. �t�Y�« ��I, ���w'�l� ••� . •�..r •��.• •Y • •k
�• ♦�il.��iri ► �T��ri.��•A��l�}���►• �?���♦� !�. . f s'��M�� � Z !� .• v ! � - s.....��������is�i
` .. ..:*Z��r �1�► ��.li�i7�+` , '::'.- •"�• �a_►l '�.:• ... 1�.. ... • . •:.....,..'..,:.'•`-
♦a���iM s �y�
•�II��• •�• � � i..•�r►i�i��-r�7a..��.T ». • ��i�♦ •1r".s' �..��i:.ii:.��. �:� .� : :
` .a. ••. - ��r���• • � ��•• •�.�. •� •���� . .
:�. •a. . ...
" ..e.. '�• .i..... .�. .��.. " _' -
��s��':•��.....• • i.���• a��.� •���...�.::�� �t�� i��ri•������ '
t• .�•�i..•�� . :��' . �..�.�.•,t�l'•aY� _ •:'��'.R}.ii:�• i� �� ��� •�• :�.i. _
�i. fi • ���.�Nr�r�:�..? �M t: •�a��h�, �r i�c• �� •...i. "" "...�� � ..�r...�
! ♦�r� •' ���• !�. - ,�i.�' " �►�. }�•li�:�fr..�s'� •..'. .�•• ' .•\r�•
•' •�� �- Y , ►�• �• �1•.�:�� •lr���• •����
\
\ �` . � ...__. - -._ —_ —_ _.__ __ .' . _ ' --
, � '' �' 1 1• 1' 1� 1 11 1 ' 1' 1 � � t 11 ' 1 1' �' 1' 1 1
1 1 1 : 1 '
1 1 1 �� I' I'' 1 I I' 1 11 1 �•
��i ii � 1• • ��ii'i 1��• t�• -
CITY OF SP�KANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading proposed ordinance 09-010
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September of 2007 and was
effective October 28'", 2007. Following the adoption of the code, a number of items were
discovered which were incorrect, impractical, or omitted. These amendments are corrections of
some of these items.
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission held a study session on these items on February
26�', 2009 and a Public Hearing on March 12�', 2009.
ANALYSIS: Below is a summary of changes being recommended by the Planning Commission:
Chapter 17.50.010-Adding a requirement that all requests for Adrninistrative
Interpretations be submitted in writing.
Chapter 17.80.150- Correct the Distribution of Notice requirements to include the
applicant, newspaper, city hall, and the main branch of the library
Table 17.80-1- Alphabetize table and add Alterations �nci Planned Residential
Devefopments.
Table 17.80 the table to make pre meetings Optional for Type II
applications with the exception of Short Subdivision and Binding Site Plans and refer to
Chapter 21.20.070(60(2) for SEPA noticing requirements.
Chapter 19.70.010 a requirement that all parking, maneuvering and outdoor storage
areas sha11 be paved.
Chapter 19.70.020-Add a requirement that all parking. maneuvering and outdoor storage
areas shall be paved.
Appendix 19-A-Allow Warehousing in areas zoned Community Commercial with
conditions.
Chapter 22.50.020-Add a requirement that all parking, maneuvering and loading areas
shall be paved and a stipulation that parking not provided on the same site as the use or
structure shall not be separated from the use or building by a street designated as an
arterial.
Chapter 22.50.030-Change directional sign size requirements to be consistent with
Table 22.110-1.
Table 22.50-7-Remove Hotel/Motel from table
Table 22.110-1-Update directionai sign information to be consistent with language in
Chapter 22.110.030, and remove copy area requirements for directional signs and name
plates.
OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed, or as modified; or direct staff further.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve ordinance #09-010
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen — Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
(1) Amended Text
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANC� NO. 09-010
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE
COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING ORDINANCE 07-015
SPOKANE VALLEY NIUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 17.50.010,
17.80.150, TABLE 17.80-1, TABLE 17.80-2, 19-A, 19.70.010, 19.70.020,
22.50.020, 22.110.030, TABLE 22.50-7 AND TABLE 22.110 ADDING A
REQUIREMENT THAT ALL REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
INTERPRETATIONS BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING, CORRECTII�IG
THE NOTICING REQUIREMENTS FOR AMENDMENTS TO THE
MIJr1ICIPAL CODE, AMENDING TABLE 17.80-1 TO INCLUDE
ALTERATIONS AND PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS
AND ALP�3ABETIZE TABLE, AMENDING TABLE 17.80-2 TO MAKE
PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS OPTIONAL FOR TYPE 2
APPLICATIONS AND CORRECT NOTICING REQUIREMENTS FOR
SEPA THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONS, ADDING REQUIREMENTS
FOR ALL PA►�tKING, l�'IANEWERING, OUTDOOR STOR.AGE AREAS,
AND LOADING AREAS BE PAVED IN THE IlvDUSTRIAL AND
CO1ViMERCIAL ZONES, ADD ING A REQUIREMENT THAT
SEPARATED PARKING FACILITIES NOT BE SEPARATED BY
STREETS DESIGNATED AS ARTERIALS, ALLOWING
WAREHOUSES TO LOCATE IN THE CO��]MUNITY COMMERCIAL
ZONES WITH CONDITIONS, CORRECT INFORMATION RELATEI)
TO DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND NAME PLATES T� BE CONSIS'I'ENT,
AND REMOVE PROVISION REQUIRING HOTELS/MOTELS TO
HAVE LOADING SPACES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Uniform Development Code
(UDC) pursuant to �rdinance 07-015, on the 24th day of September, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the UDC became e£fective on 28th day of October, 2007; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planni.ng Commission held a public hearing on these
issues on February 26, 2009 and determ.ined to add a provision requiring all request for
Administrative Interpretations to be made in writing, correct the noticing requirements
for text amendments to the Municipal Code, amending Table 17.80-1 to include
Alterations and Planned Residential Developments and alphabetize table, amend Table
17.80-2 to correct SEPA noticing requirements and make Pre-Application Meetings
Optional for Type II Applications, adding a requirement that all parki.ng, maneuverins,
outdoor storage areas, and loading areas be paved in the Industrial and Commercial zoncs
and that separated parking not be separated by streets designated as Arterials, allowing
Warehouses to locate in the Commun.ity Commercial zone w conditions, correct
information related to directional signs and name plates for consistency, and remove
provision requiruig Hotels/Motels to have loading spaces met the criteria for approving
an amendmcnt including being consistent w•ith the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
1
and that it bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare and
protection of the environment.
WHEREAS, WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, the city issued
a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the
Valley News Herald, posted the DNS at City Ha11 and at the main branch of the library,
and mailed the DNS to all aff'ected public agencies; and
WHEREAS, it has been deternuned that the proposed amendments are consistent with
the applicable goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Washington state law, the city notified the Washington
State Department of Community Trade and Economic Development of the proposed
changes on January 23, 2�09
NOW THEREF4RE, THE CITY COUNCIL SPECIFICALLY ORDAINS AS SET
FORTH BELOW:
Section One: Chapters 17, 19, and 22 shall be amended as follows:
17.50.01 U Interpretation of development code.
Any person may request a formal interpretation of a provision of the development code,
zoning map, arterial road map, prior conditions of approval, or prior administrative
I interpretations. A11 re�uests for furmal interpretations shall he made in «Titin�J. The
i.nterpretation shall be made by the community development director (hereafter referred
to as "the director"). The community development department (hereafter referred to as
"the department") shall maintain a file of all written interpretations. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.15U "1'ype IV applicaiiuns — T'ext amendments to the uniform development
code.
A. Iniiiation. Text amendments tu this code may be initiateci by any of the follo«ing:
1. Property owner(s) or their representatives;
2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or
3. The department, planning commission, or city Gouncil.
B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the City.
C. Application Submittal.
1. After submittal of an applicant-initiated application, the application shall be
subject to a pre-application conference, counter-complete, and fully complete
determination pursuant to SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100.
2. After submittal, the application shall be placed on the next available planning
commission agenda.
D. Notice of Public Hearing. Amendments io this code require a public bearing before
the planaing commission.
1. Conteats of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall including the following:
2
a. The citation, if aay, of the provision tbat would be changed by the
proposal along with a brief description of tbat provision;
b. A statement of how the proposal would change the affected provision;
c. The date, time, and place of the public hearing;
d. A statement of the availability of the of�icial file; and
e. A statement of the right of any person to submit written comments to the
planning commission and to appear at the public hearing of the planning commission to
give oral comments on the proposal.
2. Distribution ofNotice. The departinent shall distribute the notice t�� tl��
a���licant. nc�� s�,�iver. ritv h��ll and th� �Zlain hranch ot� tl�e libr�r` .�
. .�{�}
E. Planning Commission Recommendation — Procedure. Following the public hearing,
the planning commission shall consider the proposal and sball prepare and forward a
reeommendation to the city cut�ncil. Tlie planning comnussion sh�ll take one of the
following actions:
1. If the planning commission determines tliat the proposal should be adopt�d, it
may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The
planning commission may make modifications to any proposal prior to recommendin�
the proposal to city eouncil for adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planninb
commission rnust eanduct a public hearing on the modified proposal;
2. If the plan.n.ing commission detemaines that the proposal should not be adopted,
it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or
3. If the planning commission is unable to take either of the actions specified in
subsectioas (E)(1) or (2) of this section, the proposal will be sent to city council with t��e
notation that the planning comnaission makes no recommendarion.
F. Approval Criteria. The City may approve amendments to this code if it iinds that:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,
«�elfare, and protection of the environment.
G. City Council Action. Within 60 days of receipt of the planning commission's
findings and recommendations, the city council shall consider the findings and
recommendations of the commission cancerning the application and may hold a public
hearing pursuant to council rules. The department shall distribute notice of the counc i l's
public hearing pursuant tc� SVMC 17.�l1.120(B). By a majurit�� vc�te, the city council
shall :
1. Approve the application;
2. Disapprove the application;
3. Modify the applieation. If modilication is suhstantial, the council must cither
conduct a public hearing on the modified proposal; or
4. Refer the proposal back to the planning cocllmission for furt����r cunsi��ratioii.
H. Transmittal to the State of Washington. At least 60 days prior to final action bein�
taken by the city council, the Washington State Departinent of Community, Trade and
Economic Development (CTED) shall be provided with a copy of the amendments in
order to initiate the 60-day comment period. No latcr than 10 days after adoption of the
,
�
proposal, a copy of the fina] decision shall be forwarded to CTED. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
Table 17.80-2 — Permit Type and Land Use Application
Pre- Counter- Fully Notice of Notice of Final
Application application COmplete complete application public decision
Type conference determination determination 17.80.110 hearing and
17.80.080 17.80.090 17.80.100 17.80.120 notice
17.80.130
I O X X N/A N/A X
� 'll **�� X X X N/A X
I I I X X X X X X
X Required O Optional N/A Not Applicable
*Does not apply to SEPA threshold determinations. Refer to section 21.20.070(B1(21
for noticing requirements
*'Except for Short Subdivisions and Bindina Site Plans which reouire a Pre-AoQlication
meetinq
Table 17.80-1 — Permit Type and Land Use Application
Type Land Use aad Development Application SVMC Cross
Reference
Type I Accessory dwelling units 19.40.100
Administrative determinations by community development director, Multiple
public works director, or building ofFicial
Administrative exception 19.144
Administrative interpretation 17.50.010
Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20.80
�IIIIC�lI7 ��rmits nut sub,�ect to SLP,•1 ? 1.?0.0�(�-9�:4�:
�-49
� Flc���dplain devel����m� 21.30
� Gradin� �ermits 2:�.�0
� Home occupation permit 19.4U.14U
� Recc�rd of Sur��e�� t�� E�t�iE�li�h I.�ts ���iti�in .i 13indin� Site Plan ?0.60.0�0
R.ight-of-way permits 22.130.060
Shoreline permit exemption (dock permit) 21.50
Site plan review 19.130
Temporary use permit 19.160
4
Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short subdivision or 20.30.060
binding site plan
I �z-�-.-�8
I =i :i
� ��� �e
Altzratiuns-Preliminar�� and final subdivision�. short sub�livisic�El�. ??.ti(�
bindinQ site plans '
BindinQ site�lan-Preliminarv and final ' 20.50�8:59
BindinL site plan-Cl�an���� of cc�ilditions ?0.�0�?-�-�9
Type ���
II SEPA threshold determination 21.20.060
( Sh�►reline sub�tailtial de�•elopn�ent pemlit 21.50�-8:-0�8
S1.�ort slibdi�Fisi�n-Prclimin�r�• and tinal 22.30.
22.4 .. ._ .
I Preliminarv shurt subciivision �lll�lil� Slt� p��iI'1 -Cha�i�e ut�conditions 22.�0
Wireless communication facilities 22.120
Conditional use permits 19.150
( Planned Residential Deti•elopments 19.54?8:39
� Plat Vacation 20.7�.0?0
( TYpe Preliminarv subdi��ision-Chan«� of conditians��ee ?0.>4�-9:��
III .
Subdi�,•isions-Preliminarv ?�. �0 ?8�8
ee��i�
� Vari ance es3 19.17 ..
Zoning map amendments (site-specific rezones) 19.30.030
Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments (text and/or map) 17.80.144
Type
N Area-wide zoning map amend.ments 17.80.140
Development code text amendments 17.80.150
�
19.70.010 I-1, Light Industrial district.
A. The Light Industrial designation is a planned industrial arca with specia) e�i�phasis
and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and intemal and community compatibility.
Typical uses would include technology and other low-impact industries. Light industri al
areas may also include of�iee and commercial uses as ancillary uses ��7thin an overall
plan for industrial development.
B. Supplemental Re�ulati�ns.
;
1. The outdoor storage provisions contained in SVMC 19.6U.U60(B) shall apply to
the I-1 district.
2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not
interfere with parking or internal circulation with permission of the property owner,
health certificate and permit.
3. Setbacks.
a. Front and flanking street yard setbacks shall be 20 feet; and
b. Side and rear yard setbacks of 35 feet are required only adjacent to
residential zoning districts.
4. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code
provided: (A) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use
in the zone; (B) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone;
and (C) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed
in the zone.
a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks,
vcntilating fans, or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building.
b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples,
belfries, wireless masts, and similar structures.
c. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which
are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of
materials.
d. Water stand pip�s and tanks. (Ord. 08-017 § 1, 2008; Ord. 0?-015 5 4,
2007).
�. All parkin 111311�Llt't „ 11�j c�t1T� �t�r�i���� ar�.;s �hall he �?�?��ed.
Exemptions:
a. Par�in�T �u��l 5tura��c; arc:a� r�►utiil�l�� u�c��i bv cl�at�� �nd oth�r h�a�-�
equipment as approved bv th�e Plannin� Director.
f�. The PlanninQ Director mav ���aive portions of these requirements unc���
recommendation by the Spokane ReEional Clean Air A�encv or the
Spokane Vallev De��elopment Enoineerine Division «�hen it can h��
dzmonstrated that the proposed surfacin�. such as �rass oavers or other
technolo�v will not adverselv at���ct �ir qualitv �vater qualit` �r th�_
inte�rih� �f the narki �re��.
19.70.020 I-2, Heavy Industrial district�
A. Heavy Industrial designated property is characterized by intense industrial activities
which include manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, freight handling and
similar operations. Heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic unpacts.
B. Supplemental Regulations.
1. I-2 allows any use permitted in the I-1 zoning district, except as specifically
provided in Appendix 19-A.
2. Mobile food vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do not
interfere with parki.ng or intemal circulation with permission of the property owner,
health certificate and permit.
6
3. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code
provided: (A) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use
in the zone; (B) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Qverlay zone;
and (C) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height lunits prescribed
in the zone.
a Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, sta.irway�s, tanks,
ventilating fans, or sunilar equipment to operate and maintain a building.
b. Fire or parapet walls, skylights, fla�les, cl�imneys, church steeples,
belfries, wireless masts, and sim.ilar structures.
e. Structures such as silos, feed mills, batch plants, and fixed cranes w�vch
are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and storage of
materials.
d. V�'ater stand pipes and tank�. (C�rd. �8-O l 7� l.?�08; nrd. 07-� 1 S��,
?007).
-+. r111 ���ll�k�l:
Exemptions :
a. P�.
�quipment as approved bv the Plannin� Director
The PlanninQ Director mav waivz portions of th�: ` �;. .:::,_ :..:.
r�commendation by the Spokane Re�ional Clean Air AQency or t:
�pokane Vallev Development Eneineering Division when it can i
�izmonstrated thai the pronosed surfacing , such as gra.ss pavers o�
t�chnolo�,y will not adversel�� �ffect ��r �t��lit��. w�ater aualitv_ar the
;,,t��►�-ih� nf 1h� n�ar�: irR �r:-� - -
�
Chapter 19.12c)
PERMITTED AND ACCESSOR`�( US�S
Section�
��'.�.. E. � �T`'l�(,i�.
i �.�.1 �'U.0 1 U (_J�►��i al.
Uses are classified u5i,z� tl�� �uU? Nurt�i t�ii�ri��ul 1►ic�u�try l.l��ilic;�tiuii Sy��tcnl
(NAICS) published by the U.S. Census Bureau based on category and subcategory.
Subcategories i.nelude all uses not identified separately by specific number. Uses ma�� '�:
permitted, be subject to conditions, or require conditional or temporary ,1 �`��;� Pi �, �!�; :� �
shown in Appendix 19-A, the schedule of permitted and accessc�r� ������;.
Schedule of Mi Cor Cit Ga Neighb Com Regio Com I- I-2 Referen
M M NA NA p��mitted Uses ze rido y rde � or600d munit n�l munit l He ce
- F- F- IC ICS fic
1 2 3 4 1 Z S# S d r Ce a � Comm y Com y Li sv Conditi
:lppe ndix 19-A Us Mix nte Off ercial Cam merci Facili gh v ons
�
e ed r ice mercj al ty t In
Ce Use al In d
nte d
r
71 711 Adult S S Chapter
entertainment I 9. SO
estabiishment SVMC
45 453 Adult retail use S S Chapter
establishmcnt 19.80
SVMC
31 311 Agricultural P P
processing plant,
warehouse
33 336 Aircraft P
411 manufacturing
48 481 Airstrip, private P P
219
62 621 Ambulance P P P P P P P P
91 service
54 S41 Animal P S P P P SVMC
94 clinic/veterinary 19.60.0
40(B}(1
)
31 311 Animal P
613 proctssing
facility
S S S S S S 11 112 Animal raising S S F..xcludi
and/or kecping ng
NAICS
1122,
Swine.
SVMC
19.40.1
SQ.
81 812 Animal shelter P P
91
31 311 Animal P
61 slaughtering nnd
processing
45 453 Antique storc P P P P P P
92
44 448 AppareVtailor P P I' P P P P P
shop
44 443 Appliance P P P P A A Only if
111 sales/service manufa
ctured/
assembl
cd on
F���
s.
33 335 Appliances P P
22 manufacturing
45 453 Art P P P P P P P P
92 gallery/studio
g
32 324 Asphalt P
12 pl$nUmanufactur
ing
33 333 Assembly — P
heavy
33 334 Assembly — light P P P P P P
P P P 62 623 Assisted living P P P P
312 farility
45 4S3 Auction house P P P
3
4i 453 Auction yard P P
3 (excluding
livestock)
11 115 Auction yard, P
2 livestock
33 336 Autamobile P
1 assembly plant
92 922 Automobilc P P
impound yard
44 441 Automobile/light P P P P
truck salcs and
scrvic�
48 485 Automobifeltaoci P P P P P P P P
3 rental
81 811 Automobile/truc S P P P Enclose
121 k1RV/motorcycl d
e painting, structur
repair, body and e only.
fender works SVMC
19.6Q.0
SO(B}(3
)•
44 441 Automotive P P P P P P
3 parts,
accessories and
tires
31 311 Bakery products P P
81 manufacturing
44 445 Bakery, retail P P Y S S P P P A A Floor
291 area
limited
to 10%
of
GLFA
not to
exceed
1,000
�
52 522 [3ank, P P P P P P P P P P
11 savings/loan and
other financial
ins�tituiions
81 812 Barber/beauty P P P A P P P P P
1 shop
9
33 335 Battery P P
9l rcbuildinglmanu
facturing
P P P P P P 72 721 Bed and P P P
191 breakfast
I1 I12 Bcekccping, P
9l cornrncrciaJ
S S S 11 112 Beeke�ping, SVMC
91 hobby 19.40.1
�o���
45 451 Bicycle P P P P P P P P P
1 saleslservice
33 336 Boat building, P P
611 rcpair and
maintcnance
44 441 Boat P P
222 saleslscrvicc
45 451 Book/stationcry P P P P P P P P
2 store
31 312 Bottiing plant P P
1
71 713 Bowling alley P P P P P
95
72 722 Brewery, micro P P P P P P P P P
31 312 Brewery, winery P P P P P P P
1 andJor distillery
33 339 Bcoom P P
994 manufacturing
4� 444 Building supply P P P
l and home
improvement
44 �45 Candy and P P P P P P P P
292 confectionery
71 713 Carnival, circus T T T T T T T T
99
32 32 I Carpenter shop P P P P
9
56 56l Carpet and rug P P
7�0 cleaning plants
81 811 Carwash P P S P P P P SVMC
192 I 9.6(?.0
4aB�
71 713 Casino P P P P P
2
45 4S4 Catalog and mail P P P p P
113 orderhouscs
P P 72 722 Catering services P P P P P P P
32
P P P P 81 812 Cemetery and P
2 crematorics
45 451 Ceramics shap P P P P P P P
10
112
32 325 Chcmical P
manufacturing
P P P P P P 81 813 Church, templc, P P P P P P P P
mosque,
synagoguc and
parsonage
44 448 Clothcs, rctail P P P P P
1 salcs
49 493 Cold P P
12 storagdfood
locker
61 611 College or P P P P P P P P
3 university
S1 51? Communication P P P P P P P P
service/sales
33 334 Communicarions P P P P
2 equipment
manufacturing
P P P P P P 92 921 Community P P P P P P P P P P P
— facilities
922
P P P 81 8l3 Community hall, P P P P P P P P
4 club, lodge or
re�reational
facility
P P P 62 623 Community P
2 residcntial
facility (6 or less
residents)
P P P 62 623 Community P
2 residential
facility (breater
than 6 residents,
no moro than 25)
56 561 Composting P
73 storagelproces�si
ng. commcrcial
54 S41 Computcr P P P P P P P P P P
S 1 services
23 237 Contractor's P P
3 — yard
238
P P P 62 623 Convalescent P P
hom�, nursing
home
44 445 Convenience P P A A P P P P P
12 store
33 339 Cosmetic and P P
miscellaneous
manufacturing
P P P P P P 62 623 Day carc, adult P P P A P P P A A A
3
11
P P 62 624 Day care, child P P A A P A A A
410 (13 children or
more)
P P P P P P 62 624 Day care, child P P P A A P P P A A A
410 (12 children or
fewcr)
45 452 DepartmenUvari P P P P P
1 ety store
44 44b Drug store P P P A P P P P A P
I1
81 8l2 Dry cicaners P P P A P P P P
3
81 S 12 Dry cleaning, P P
332 laundry, linen
supply plant,
commercial
32 32l Dry kiln I'
111
4
S S S 81 814 Dwelling, SVMC
accessory 19.40.1
xpartmcnts 00
81 814 Dwelling. S S S SVMC
caretaker's I 9.60.0
residence 60(l3x 1
)
P P 72 721 Dwelling, P P P P P
3 congrcgate
P P P P 81 814 Dwelling,
duple�c
P P P 81 814 Dwell'wg, P P P S S SVMC
multifamily 1 .fi0.0
20(B)
P P P P P P 81 814 nwelling, S S SVMC
singlc-f'amily 1 y.60.0
?p(g)
P P P 81 814 Dwclling, P P P P
townhouse
33 334 ElectricaVelectro P P P P P P P
- nic/comp�ter
335 component and
systcm
manufacturing/a
sscmbly
32 322 Emery cloth and P P
226 sandpaper
manufacturing
71 713 EntertainmenUre P P P P P
creation
facilities, indoor
71 713 Gntcrtainment/re P P P P P P
9 creation
facilities,
outda�r
��
53 532 Equipmcnt rcntal P P P P P
3 shop
81 811 Equipmcnt sales, P P P P P
3 repair, and
maintenance
72 722 Espresso/latte P P P P P P P P P P P
2 relail sctvicc
R R R R 92 92 Essential public R R R R R R R Chapter
facilitics 19.90
SVMC
A A 71 713 Exercisc P P P A A P P P P A A
94 facility/gyrn/athl
etic club
32 325 E.Yplosive P
92 manufacturing
49 493 Explosivc P P
I90 storage
P P P P P P 81 814 Family home, P P P P P
adult
P P P P P P 81 814 Family home, P P P P
child
44 441 Farm machinery P P P
222 sales and repair
11 112 Fecd tot P
112
31 311 Feed/cereaUflour P P
211 mill
32 325 Fertilizer P
3 manufacturing
81 812 Fitm developing P P P A A P P P
92
44 443 Filtdcamera P P P A A P P P
13 sales/servicc
�t5 453 Florist shop P P P A A P P P P
1
31 311 Food product P
manufacturing/st
orage
44 445 Food sales, P P P S P P SVMC
21 specialty/butcher 19.60.0
shop/meat 44(B}(3
macket/specialty )
foods
48 4$4 Freight P P
forwarding
44 447 Fueling station P P P A P P P P
81 812 Funeral home P P P
21
33 337 Furniture P P
__ manufacturing
31 315 Garment P P
13
manufacturing
45 453 Gift shop P P P A A P P P A
P P P P P P 71 7 l3 Golf course P P P P
91
C C 71 713 Golf driving P C P P P
9l range/training
ccnier
49 493 Grain elevaior P P
13
4d 444 Greenhouse, P P P P P P
22 nurscry, garden
ceater, retail
11 111 Greenhousc, S S P P SVMC
4 nursery, I9.GOA
cotnmercial 50(Bx3
)
44 445 Groccry store P P P S P P SVMC
1 ! 9.l,�.0
�0(B){3
)
44 444 Hardware store P P P S P P SVMC
13 19.60.0
40(Bx3
)
56 562 Hazardous waste S S SVMC
21 I trcatment and � 1.40.0
stotage 60
48 4$1 Hciiport P P
2
48 481 Helistop C C C C C P
2
45 451 Hobby shop P P P A P P P
12
44 442 E Iome P E' P P
furnishings,
retail salc
62 622 Hospital P P P P P P
1
R R R R R 62 622 Hospital, R R R R R R R R R
210 psychiatric and
substancc abusc
62 622 Hospital, P P P P P P P A A
310 spcxialty
72 721 HoteUmotel P P P P P P P P
l
31 312 Ice plant P P
113
32 325 [nk P
91 manufacturing
45 453 Jewelry, clock, P P P A P P P P P
22 musical
inswment
14
assembly,
salcslservict
81 812 Kennel, indoor S S S S P P Scx
91 kennel, doggie z�ning
day carc facility districts
for
conditio
ns.
54 541 Laboraiorics P P P
38 (Bio Safety
t.evel 2)
54 S4l Laboraiories P P P
38 (Bio Saftty
Leve13)
54 541 Laboratories P P
38 (Bio Safety
L.evel 4)
62 621 Laboraiories, P P P P P P
S 1 medical and
diagnostic
44 4-04 Landscapc P P P P
19 maierials sales
A A 8l 812 Laundromal P P A P P P P
3l0
44 445 Liquor storc P P P A A P P
3
56 561 Locksmith P P P A A P P P
622
32 321 l.umlx'rmill, P
1 sawmill, shingle
mill, plywood
mill
33 332 Machinc shop P P P
71
33 333 Machinc/machin P P
ery
manufacturing
23 236 Manufactured P P
I 1 S home fabrication
S S S S S 81 814 Msnafactured SVMC
home park 19.40. I
30
45 4S3 Manufactured P P P
93 home salts
32 327 Manufacturing, P P
nonmetallic
metal products
45 453 Market, outdoor T T T T T T
998
62 621 Massage therapy P P P P P P P P
498
31 311 MeaVfish P P
6 - rannin�, cuttinQ.
1�
31 I curing and
7 smoking
33 339 Medica] and P P P
1 laboratory
instrumentlappar
atus
manufacturing
42 423 Medical, dcntal, P P P A P
45 and hospit.al
equipmcnt
supply/sales
62 621 MedicaUdenta! P P P P P P P P P
4 clinic
62 621 MedicaVdental P P P P P P P P P
U�1CC
33 332 Metal fahrication P P
33 332 Metal plating P
33 332 MetFil proc�scs, P
hot
Mineral product P
manufacturing,
nonmetallic
21 212 Mining P
72 722 Mobile food S S S S S S S S S Set
330 vendors zoning
districts
for
conditio
ns.
T T 23 236 Model home
115 units
71 712 Museum P P P P P P P P
ll
45 451 Music store A P P A P P P
14
A A 56 561 Office P P P P P P P P P P P
45 4S3 Office and P P P A P P P P
21 computer
supplies
99 999 Off-road P P
recrcatioaal
vehicle use
11 111 Orchard, tree P P
3 farming,
commercial
32 322 Paperlpulp milis P
11
48 485 Park-and-ridc P P P P P P P P P
9 facility
45 522 Paw�nshop P P P P
298
81 R 12 Pcrsonal scrvice P P P P P P P P
16
45 453 Pet shop P P P A P P P
91
32 324 Petrolc�m and P
11 coal products
manufacturing
S4 541 Photographic P P P A A P P P
92 studio
32 32S Plastic and P
11 rubber products
manufacturing
32 326 Alastic injection P
199 molding,
thcrmoset
32 326 Plastic injection P P P Y P P
199 molding,
thermoplastic
32 326 Plastic injection P
199 solvent molding
49 491 Post office, P P P P P P P P P P P
posta.l ccntcr
22 22 t Power pla.nt P
(excluding
public utility
facilities)
56 561 Print shop P P P A P P P P P
43
32 323 Printing, P P
reprogaphics,
bookbinding
services,
coaimercial
48 488 Public pay P P P P P P
49 parking
garagc!!ot
P P P P P P 22 22l Public utility P P P P P P P P P P P
distribution
facility
S S 5 S S S 23 237 Public utility S S S S S S S S S S S SVMC
transmission 19.40.0
facility 3Q
? 1 713 Racecourse P P P P
99
71 711 Racxtrack P P
212
51 S 15 RadiolTV P P P P P P
1 broadcasting
studio
48 482 Railroad yard, P
1 repair shap and
roundhouse
72 721 Recreational C S SVMC
_ 2 vehicle 19.60.0
park/campgroun 60
17
d
44 441 Recreational P P
21 vehicle sales and
service
P P P P P P S 1 S 15 Repeater facility P P P P P P P
11
72 722 Restaurant, P P P P P P
2 drive-in
72 722 Rcstaurant, P P A C P P P P
2 drive-through
72 722 Restaurant, full P P P A P P P P P P
serrrice
45 452 Retail sales P P P A P P P A A Limitcd
— to items
453 manufa
ctured
on the
premise
s.
71 713 Riding stable P P
99
33 331 Rolling mill P
22
31 314 Rope P P
991 manufacturing
32 325 Rubber P
212 reclamntion,
manufsicturinglfa
brication
P P P P P P 6l 611 Schools, public P P P P P P P
1 and private, K
through 12
P 61 611 Schools, P P P P P P P P P P
4 professional,
vocational and
trade schools
Sho�f�room P P P P P P
45 453 Secondhsnd P P P P P P
3 store,
consignment
sales
33 339 Sign P P
95 manufacturing/rc
pair
33 339 Sign painting P P P P P
95 shop
32 325 Soap and P
61 cicaning
compound
manufacturing
Sb 562 Solid waste S S S SVMC
92 recyclingJtransfe �9.60.0
r site 60(B)
18
61 611 Specialized P P P P S P P P Adaptiv
6 training/learning c reuse
schools or of
studios cxisting
structur
�.s only.
No
��
on
allowod
P P 49 493 Storage, sclf- P P P P
19 service facility
49 493 Storage, general S S S S P Sea
— outdaors zoning
districts
for
conditio
ns.
Tank stora.ge, S S S S 5 S S S S SVMC
LPG above 21.40.0
ground 60
21 213 Tank storage, S S SVMC
1 l2 critical material l 4 0
abovc ground �0
21 213 Tank storage, S S S S SVMC
112 critical matcrial l.40.
bclow ground �0
31 316 Tanning, curing P
1 of hides and
skins
72 722 Tavcrn P P P P P P
4
Taxidermy P P
S S S S S S S 1 S 17 Tclecommunicat S S S C S S S C S S Chapter
2 ion wireless 22.120
antenna array SVMC
C C S 1 S 17 Tciccommunicai S S S C S S S C� S S Chapter
2 ion wireless 22.120
support towec SVMC
31 314 Textile P P
11 manufacturing
71 711 Theater, indoor P P P P P P P
71 711 Theater, outdoor P P P
56 562 Tire, rccap and P
92 retread
manufacturing
S S S S S S S 1 517 Tower, ham S S S C S S C S S SVMC
9 operator 19.40.1
10(A)
22 221 Tower, wind C S S S C S S SVMC
119 turbine su�port 19•40• 1
� �)
48 485 Transit center P P P P P P P P P
19
1
C 72 721 I'ransitional
3 housing
44 441 Truck sales, P P
222 rental, repair and
maintenance
44 4�5 Truck st�p P P
447
81 811 Upholstery shop P P P P P
42
� 49 493 Warehousing A S S A P P Adaptiv
11 e rcuse
of
earisting
st�vctur
ts. No
expansi
on
allowcd
32 321 Wood product P P
manufacturing
56 562 Wrccking, C S SVMC
92 recycling, jwik 19.60.0
and salvage 60(B)
yards
P Permitted Use A
Accessory
Only
R Rcgionul Siting T
Temporary
Permit
S Conditions Apply C
Coaditional
L1sr Pcrmit
(Ord. 08-026 § 1, 2008; Ord. 08-002 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
22.50.020 Vehicle parking.
A. Rules for Computing Number uf Parl:in� Spaces — Show in Table 2?.�0-2. The
number of required off-street parking spaces shall be based on the following:
1. "Floor area" shall mean the gross square feet of the specific use.
2. Where fraetional spaees result, the parking spaces required shall be constructed
to the nearest whole number.
3. Uses not specified in Table 22.50-2 shall provide parking based on a use of
similar nature;
4. New Construction. Prior to occupancy of a new structure within any zoning
district, off-street vehicle pazki.ng shall be provided in accordance with Table 22.50-2.
5. Expansion of Existing Use. Prior to occupancy of an expanded (enlarged) floor
area, off-street vehicle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 22.50-2 based
on the expanded square footage.
20
6. Chaage of Use. If the mi.nimum number of vehicle parking spaces required for
the change of use added to the e�cisting on-site parki.ng supply falls short of the minimum
number of vehicle parking spaces required for the project as a whole, the applicant shall
provide additional spaces to bring the total supply up to the minimum required.
7. In the case of multiple-use occupancies, other than shopping centers, in a
building or on a lot, the total requirement for off-street parlting shall be the sum of the
requirements for the various uses computed separately.
8. Tandem spaces shall not count as required parkin�.
I 9. :�ll p ��rkin�,� maneu�•erin� an�� lc��i�iin�T ��rea; �1�:�]l i� - _' --
B. Location of parking spaces, except as follows:
1. For nonresidential uses, required off-street parking shall be located in the same
zone or in a zone which allows the use for which the parking is required.
2. All parking spaces requimd herein shall be located on the same �arcel t�vith the
building or use served unless:
a. The parking is located on a contiguous parcel ur parcels under the samc
ownership and title notice is filed identifying the parking serving the other building or
use; or
b. If the required parking for a building or use is located on a parcel(s) other
than described in subsection (B)(1) of this section, the owner of the parcel upon which
the proposed parking is located executes a joint parking agreement in a form acceptable
to the city attomey, stating that the parcel is devoted in whole or in part to required
parking for the use of a parcel or parcels under separate ownership. The agreement shal l
be binding on both properties and shall be recorded with the Spokane County auditor's
o�ce and filed with the Spokane Valley department of community development;
c. Where shared parking is proposed, the minimwn number of parking
spaces for all shared uses shown on Table 22.50-2 shall be calculated. When these totals
are applied to the percentages shown on Table 22.50-1, the minimum number of parking
spaces reyuired is the largest sum of the individual totals for each time period.
d. Par�l�� ili�t ��r��vid ��n the Sc1I11� Slt� �s the use or � �,-,,� �, �, �� �,? I , i i
` � , , ,.. i � . '-_ � � __ _ _. � -
22.110.030 Permit required.
A. Other than for those uses listed in subsection B of this section, a sign permit is
required for all allowed permanent signs, temporary signs, and billboards.
B. Permits are not required for on-premises o�icial signs; seasonal decorations;
merchandise displays; point-of-purchase advertising displays; national and state flags;
flags of a political subdivision; notice signs, pennants and streamers without advertising
copy; symbolic flags of nonprofit institutions dedicated to public service; legal notices
required by law; barber poles; historic site designations; commemorative
monuments/plaques; gravestones; advertising copy affixed to phone booths; donation and
recycli.ng containers; lettering or symbols applied directly onto or flush-mounted
magnetically to a motor vehicle operating i.n the normal course of business; political signs
supporting political issues, caudidates or ballot measures; replacement of copy on signs
( otherwise permitted; name plates with less than four€�re square feet of copy area;
directional signs w less than four square feet of copy area; and murals containin� no
copy.
21
C. Pemut applications shall include a site plan that provides the following information:
1. The location of the af�ected lot, building(s) and sign(s);
2. The scale of the site plan;
3. A scaled drawing of the proposed sign or sign revision, including size, height,
copy, structural footing details, method of attachment and illumination;
4. The location of all existing signs on the site including size and hei�ht;
5. For signs subject to spacing regulations, the location of neighboring signs on
adjacent properties;
6. Approved sign plan, if applicable; and
7. Tax parcel number where proposed sign will be located. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
22.110.0�U Number, general regutations for permitted permancnt sigos.
A. Permitted permanent signs shall comply with the requirements of Table 22.110-1.
No more than the maximum numbers of either freestanding pole signs or monument si��l
structures are allowed per parcel.
Table 22.110-1— Location, Hci ht and Copy Area Rc uirements
Maaimum
Copy COpy Side
Land Use � On1° g Number Hei t COPy � �a Y�'d Permit Additional
District �r � Area (ft2)/I,ot �� Setback Required Provisions
Parcel � (ft2} Frontage � ��•�
< 100 ft. rontage
> 100 ft.
Attached Wall Signs
Institutional Residential * * * �/ n/a �/a y *25% of
Zones wall area
Single Business Residential 1 n/a 60 n/a n/a n/a Y
Zones
All Mixed
Use and *25% of
Nonresidential Nonresidential * �a * n/a n/a n/a Y wall area
Zones
per building
Freestanding Signs
Subdivision/Area *Per arterial
Name/Multifamily A11 Zones 1* 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y street
Complex/lnstitutional frontage
Single Business Neighborhood 1 20 100 n/a n/a S Y
Business (NC) -
Multi-business Zones *
22
Complex
Single Business Mixed Use 1* 30 n/a 100 200 5 Y
and
Multi-business Nonresidential
omplex Zones (except 1* 40 250 n/a n/a 5 Y
NC)
Nonresidential No 1 SQ 250 n/a n/a 5 Y *Adjacent
Freeway* Zones to I-90 only
Monument Signs
Subdivision/Area
Name/Multifamily A11 Zones 1 10 32 n!a n/a n/a Y
Complex/Institutional '�Per arterial
street
Single Business Neighborhood 1* 7 75 n/a n/a 5 Y frontage
Multi-business Business (NC)
Complex �nes 2* 7 90 n/a n/a 5 Y
Single Business AIl Mixed 2* 7 90 n/a n/a 5 Y
Use and '`Per street
Multi Nonresidential2* � 150 n/a n/a 5 y frontage
Complex Z�nes
Other Signs
Direc;ti�nal A11 Zones nla n/a - � i�. a� n/a n/a 1�
Name F�lates All Zones 1 n/a 4 n!� n/a n/a
Table 22.50-7 — Loading Spaces Required
Use/Gross Squarc Fcct Required Loading Spaces
Industrial, manufacturing wholesale, warehouse, similar uses
10,000 —�0,000 squar� feet 1 space
40,001 — 60,000 square feet 2 spaces
60,001 —100,000 square feet 3 spaces
Over 100,000 squan feet l space f'or eac}15U,000 square feet or part thereof
I T.7.�4 -.1 I..�.�.40� *' � Gill�s
7
20,000 — 60,000 square feet 1 spaGe
60,001-100,000 square feet 2 spaces
O�}�r 100,000 squar� feet 1 space for each 50,0�0 squarc; feet or part tl�ereof
�ospitals, convsilescentlnursing homes and similar institutions
10,000 —�0,000 square feet 1 space
��
_ .,
40,000 — 100,000 square feet 2 spaces
Over 100,000 square feet 1 space for each 50,000 square feet or part thereof
Department stores, retail and other com.mercial uses
10,000 — 20,000 square feet 1 space
20,001 — 50,000 square feet 2 spaces
50,001 —100,000 square feet 3 spaces
Over 100,000 square feet 1 space for each 50,000 square feet or part thereof
Seetion Two: Severability. If any section, sentence, clause ur phrases of this Urdinance
should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of compet�nt jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validit}� or constitutionality of any
other sectio�, clause or phrase of this Ordinance.
Seerion Three: TCfective Date. "I�his ordinance shall be in full force and ci�ect tiv� (5)
days after the publicaLion of the Ordinance, or a summary thereof, occurs in the official
newspaper of the City as provided by law.
Passed b�� the City Council this ciay of , 2008.
Mayor, Richard Munson
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Christine Bauibridge
Approved as to F'orn�:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Expiration Date: _
24
22.50.020 Vehicle parking.
A. Rules for Computing Number of Parking Spaces — Shown in Table 22.50-2. The
number of required off-street parking spaces shall be based on the followin�:
1. "Floor area" shall mean the gross square feet of the specific use.
2. Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces required shall be constructed
to the nearest whole number.
3. Uses �lot specified ir� Tahle 2'.�0-? shall pro�ricle plrkirl�� based �n a u�� ��1�
similar nature;
4. New Construction. I'rior to occupanc}� of a new structure �vitivn an}' zonin�;
district, off-street vehicle parking shall be provided in accordance with Table 22.50-2.
5. Expansion of Existing Use. Prior to occupancy of an expanded (enlargedl floor
area, off-street vehicle parking shall he pro��ided in accorciance � Table ??.50-2 basc�j
on the expanded square footage.
6. Change of Use. If the minimuin number uf vehicle p�u space5 requir�d 1or
t�ie change of use added to the existing on-site parking supply falls short of the minimum
number of vehicle parking spaces required for the project as a whole, the applicant shall
provide additional spaces to bring the total supply up to the minimum requirecl.
7. In the case of multiple-use occupancies, other than shopping centei�s lI1 �1
building or on a lot, the total requirement for off-street parking shall be the sum of tilc
requirements for the various uses computed separately.
8. Tandem spaces shall not count as required parking.
9. All parking, maneuvering and loading areas shall be paved.
B. Location of parking spaces, except as follows:
I. For nonresidential uses, required off-street parking shall be located in the same
zone or in a zone which allows the use for which the parking is required.
2. All parking spaces required herein shall be lacated on the same parcel with the
builciing or use served unless:
a. The parking is located on a contiguous parcel or parcels under the same
ownership and title noUce is fited identifying the parking serving the other building or
use; or
b. If the required parking for a building or use is located on a parcel(s) otl�� r
than described in subsection (B)(1) of this sectian, the owner of the parcel upon which
(he proposed parking is located executes a joint parl:ing agreement in a form acceptable
to the city attorney, stating that the parcel is devoted in whole or in part to required
parking for the use of a parcel or parcels under separate ownership. The agreement shall
be binding on both properties and shall be recorded with the Spokane Counfiy auditor's
office and filed with the Spokane Valley department of community development;
c. Where shared parlcing is proposed, the minimum number of parking
spaces for all shared uses shown on Table 22.50-2 shall be calculated. When these totals
are applied to the percentages shown on Table 22.50-1, the minimum number of parking
spaces required is the largest sum of the individual totals for each time period.
d. Parking not provided on the same site as the use or structure shall not be
sepazated from the use or building by a street designated as an arterial.
22.110.030 Permit rcquired.
A. Other than for those uses listed in subsection B of ilus section, a sign permit is
required for all allowed permanent signs, temporary signs, and billboards.
B. Permits are not required for on-premises official signs; seasonal decorations;
merchandise displays; point-of-purchase advertisiag displays; national and state flags;
flags of a political subdivision; notice signs, pennants and streamers without advertising
copy; symbolic flags of nonprofit institutions dedicated to public service; legal notices
required by law; barber poles; historic site designations; commemorative
monuments/plaques; gravestones; advertising copy affixed to phone booths; donation and
recycling contai.ners; lettering or symbols applied directly onto or flush-mounted
magnetically to a motor vehicle operating in the normal course of business; political signs
supporting political issues, candidates or ballot measures; replacement of copy on signs
otherwise permitted; name plates with less than four square feet of copy area; directional
signs with less than four square feet of copy area; and murals containing no copy.
C. Permit applications shall include a site plan that provides the following information:
1. The location of the affected lot, building(s) and sign(s);
2. The scale of the site plan;
3. A scaled drawing of the proposed sign or sign revision, including size, height,
c��py, structural footing details, method of attachment and illumination;
4. The location of all existing signs on the site including size and height;
5. For signs subject to spacing regulations, the location of neighhoring signs on
adjacent properties;
6. Approved sign plan, if applicable; and
7. Tax parcel number where proposed sign ���ill be located. (Orci. 07-01 S 5 4,
2007}.
Table 17.80-2 — Permit Type and Land Use Application
Pre- Counter- Fully Notice of Notice of Final
Application application complete complete application public decision
Type conference determination determination 17.80.110 hearing and
17.80.080 17.80.090 17.80.100 17.80.120 notice
17.80.130
I O X X N/A N/A X
*II **O X X X N/A X
I I I X X X X X X
X Required O Optional N/A Not Applicable
*Does not apply to SEPA threshold determinations. Refer to section 21.20.070(B)(2)
for noticing requirements.
**Except for Short Subdivisions and Binding Site Plans which require a Pre-Apptication
meeting
(Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
Chapter 19.120
PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES
Sections:
19.120.010 General.
19.120.010 General.
Uses are class�ed using the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) published by the U.S.
Census Bureau based on category and subcategory. Subcategories include all uses not ident�ed separately by specific
number. Uses may be permitted, be subject to conditions, or requir�e conditional or temporary use permits as shown in
Appendix 19-A, the schedule of permitted and accessory uses.
Mlx Corri
Schedule of Gar Neighbo Comm Region I-1 I-2 Referenc
R R R R M M� NAIC Pemtltted Uses � dor City den Offi rhood unity a� Comm Lig Hea e
- F- F- CS Use Mtxe Cen unity
S S Offi ce Commer Comm Comm ht vy Conditlo
1 2 3 4 1 2# Appendix 19 Cen d ter ce cial ercial ercial Facility �nd Ind ns
ber Use
71 711 Adult er�tertainment S S Chapter
establishmerrt 19.80
SVMC
45 453 Adult retail use S S Chapter
establishment '19.80
SVMC
31 311 Agricultural P P
processing plant,
warehouse
33 3364 Aircraft P
11 manufacturing
48 4812 Airstrip, private P P
19
62 6219 Ambulance service P P P P P P P P
1
54 5419 Animal P S P P P SVMC
4 clinicJveterinary 19.60.040
(B)(1)
31 3116 Animal processing P
13 facility
S S S S S S 11 112 Animal raising S S Excluding
andlor keeping NAICS �
1122,
Swine.
SVMC
19.40.150
81 8129 Animal shelter P P
1
31 3116 Animal slaughtering P
1 and processing
45 4539 Antique store P P P P P P
2
44 448 AppareVtailor shop P P P P P P P P
44 4431 Appliance P P P P A A Only if
11 saleslservice manufact
ured/
assemble
d on
premises.
33 3352 Appliances P P
2 manufacturing
45 4539 Art gallery/studio P P P P P P F P
2
32 3241 Asphait P
2 plant/manufacturing
33 333 Assembly — heavy P
33 334 Assembly — light P P P P P P
P P P 62 6233 Assisted living P P P P
12 facility
45 4533 Auction house P P P
45 4533 Auction yard P P
(excluding
livestock)
11 1152 Auction yard, P
I ivestock
33 3361 Automobile P
assembly plarit
92 922 Automobile P P
impound yard
44 441 Automobilellight P P P P
truck sales and
service
48 4853 Automob+le/taxi P P P P P P P P
rental
81 8111 Automobile/trucklR S P P P Enclosed
21 V/motorcycle ���
pair�ting, repair, only.
body and fender SVMC
�� 19.60.050
(B)(3).
44 4413 Automotive parts, P P P P P P
accessories and
tires
31 3118 Bakery products P P
1 manufacturing
44 4452 Bakery, retail P P P S S P P P A A Floor area
91 limited to
10°� of
GLFA not
to exceed
1,000 sf.
52 5221 Bank, savingslloan P P P P P P P P P P
1 and other financial
institutions
81 8121 BarbeNbeauty shop P P P A P P P P P
33 3359 Battery P P
1 rebuilding/manufact
uring
P P P P P P 72 7211 Bed and breakfast P P P
91
11 1129 Beekeeping, P
1 commercial
S S S 11 1129 Beekeeping, hobby SVMC
� 19.40.150
(C)
45 4511 Bicycle P P P P P P P P I'
sales/service
33 336fi Boat building, repair P P
11 and maintenance
44 4412 Boat sales/service P P
22
45 4512 Book/stationery P P P P P P P P
store
31 3121 Bottling plant P P
71 7139 Bowling alley P P P P P
5
72 722 Brewery, micro P P P P P P P P P
31 3121 Brew�ery, winery P P P P P P P
andlor distillery
33 3399 Broom P P
94 manufacturing
44 4441 Building supply and P P P
home improvement
44 4452 Candy and P P P P P P P P
92 confectionery
71 7139 Camival, circus T T T T T T T T
9
32 3219 Carpenter shop P P P P
56 5617 Carpet and rug P P
40 cleaning p�ants
81 8111 Carwash P P S P P P P SVMC
92 19.60.040
�B)
71 7132 Casino P P P P P
45 4541 Catalog and mail P P P P P
13 orcler houses
p P 72 7223 Catering services P P P P P P P
2
p p p p 81 8122 Cemetery and P
crematories
45 4511 Ceramics shop P P P P P P P
12
32 325 Chemical P
manufacturing
P P P P P P 81 813 Church, temple� P P P P P P P P
mosque,
synagogue and
parsonage
44 4481 Clothes, retaii sates P P P P P
49 4931 Cold storage/food P P
2 locker
61 6113 College or P P P P P P P P
university
51 517 Communication P P P P P P P P
service/sales
33 3342 Communications P P P P
equipment
manufacturing
P P P P P P 92 921 Community facilifies P P P P P P P P P P P
922
P P P 81 8134 Community hall, P P P P P P P P
club, lodge or
recreational facility
P P P 62 6232 Community P
residentiai faality (6
or less residents)
P P P 62 6232 Community P
residential facility
(greater than 6
residents, no more
than 25)
56 5617 Composting P
3 storage/processing,
commeraal
54 5415 Computer servioes P P P P P P P P P P
1
23 2373 Cor�tractor's yard P P
238
P P P 62 623 Convalescent P P
home, nursing
home
44 4451 Convenience store P P A A P P P P P
2
33 339 Cosmetic and P P
miscellaneous
manufacturing
P P P P P P 62 6233 Day care, adult P P P A P P P A A A
C C C C P P 62 6244 Day care, child (13 P P A A P A A A
10 children or more)
P P P P P P 62 6244 Day care, child (12 P P P A A P P P A A A
10 children or fewer)
45 4521 DepartmenVvariety P P P P P
store
4.4 4461 Drug store P P P A P P P P A P
1
81 8123 Dry cteaners P P P A P P P P
81 8123 Dry cleaning, P P
32 laundry, linen
supply plant,
commercial
32 3211 Dry kiln P
114
S S S 81 814 Dwelling, accessory SVMC
apartments 19.40.100
81 814 Dwelling, S S S SVMC
caretake�'s 19.60.060
residence � �
P P 72 7213 Dwelling, P P P P P
congregate
P P P P 81 814 Dwelling, duplex
P P P 81 814 Dwelling, P P P S S SVMC
multifamity 19.60.020
(B)
P P P P P P 81 814 Dwelling, single- S S SVMC
family 19.60. 20
(B)
P P P 81 814 Dwelling, P P P P
townhouse
33 334 ElectricaVelectronic/ P P P P P P P
— computer
335 component and
system
manufacturing/asse
mbly
32 3222 Emery cloth and P P
26 sandpaper
manufacturing
71 713 EntertainmenUnecre P P P P P
ation facilides,
indoor
71 7139 EntertainmenUrecre P P P P P P
ation facilities,
outdoor
53 5323 Equipment rental P P P P P
shop
81 8113 Equipment sales, P P P P P
repair, and
maintenance
72 7222 Espresso/iatte retaii P P P P P P P P P P P
service
R R R R R R 92 92 Essential public R R R R R R R Chapter
facilities 19.90
SVMC
A A 71 7139 Exencise P P P A A P P P P A A
4 facilitylgym/athletic
club
32 3259 Explosive P
2 manufacturing
49 4931 Explosive storage P P
90
P P P P P P 81 814 Family home, adutt P P P P P
p p p p p P 81 814 Family home, child P P P P
44 4412 Farm machinery P P P
22 sales and repair
11 1121 Feed Iot P
12
31 3112 Feed/cereal/flour P P
11 mill
32 3253 Fertilizer P
manufacturing
81 8129 Film developing P P P A A P P P
2
44 4431 Film/camera P P P A A P P P
3 sales/service
45 4531 Florist shop P P P A A P P P P
31 311 Food product P
manufacturing/stora
ge
44 4452 Food sales, P P P S P P SVMC
1 specialty/butcher 19.60.040
shop/meat �g��
market/specialty
foods
48 484 Freight forwarding P P
44 447 Fueling station P P P A P P P P
81 8122 Funeral home P P P
1
33 337 Fumiture P P
manufacturing
31 315 Garment P P
manufacturing
45 453 Gift shop P P P A A P P P A
P P P P P P 71 7139 Golf course P P P P
1
C C C C C C 71 7139 Golt driving P C P P P
1 range/training
center
49 4931 Grain elevator P P
3
44 4442 Greenhouse, P P P P P P
2 nursery, garden
center, retaii
11 1114 Greenhouse, S S P P SVMC
nursery, 19.60.0 0
commercial (B)(
44 4451 Grocery store P P P S P P 9 60.040
(B)(3)
44 4441 Hardware store P P P S P P SVMC
g 19.60.040
(B)(3}
56 5622 Hazardous waste S S SVMC
11 treatment and 21.40. 0
storage
48 4812 Heliport P P
48 4812 Helistop C C C C C P
45 4511 Hobby shop P P P A P P P
2
44 442 Home fumishings, P P P P
retail sale
62 6221 Hospital P P P P P P
R R R R R R 62 6222 Hospital, psychiafic R R R R R R R R R
10 and substance
abuse
62 6223 Hospital, specialty P P P P P P P A A
10
72 7211 HoteUmotel P P P P P P P P
31 3121 Ice plant P P
13
32 3259 Ink manufacturing P
1
45 4532 Jewelry, clock, P P P A P P P P P
2 musical instrument
assembly,
sales/service
81 8129 Kennel, indoor S S S S P P See
1 kennel, doggie day zoning
care facility districts
for
condifions
54 5413 Laboratories (Bio P P P
8 Safety Level 2)
54 5413 Laboratories (Bio P P P
8 Safety Level 3)
54 5413 Laboratories (Bio P P
8 Safety Level 4)
62 6215 Laboratories, P P P P P P
1 medical and
diagnostic
44 4441 Landscape P P P P
9 materials sales
A A A 81 8123 Laundromat P P A P P P P
10
44 4453 Liquor store P P P A A P P
56 56161ocksmith P P P A A P P P
22
32 3211 Lumbermill, P
sawmill, shingle
mill, plywood mill
33 3327 Machine shap P P P
1
33 333 Machine/machinery P P
manufac#uring
23 2361 Manufactured home P P
15 fabrication
S S S S S 81 814 Manufactured home SVMC
Pa � '19.40.130
45 4539 Manufactured home P P P
3 sales
32 327 Manufacturing, P P
nonmetaliic metal
products
45 4539 Marlcet, outdoor T T T T T T
98
62 6214 Massage therapy P P P P P P P P
98
31 3116 MeaUfish canning, P P
— cutting, curing and
3117 smoking
33 3391 Medical and P P P
laboratory
instrument/apparatu
s manufacturing
42 4234 Medical, derrtal, and P P P A P
5 hospital equipmerrt
supply/sales
62 6214 MedicaVdental clinic P P P P P P P P P
62 621 MedicaUdental P P P P P P P P P
office
33 332 Metal fabrication P P
33 332 Metal plating P
33 332 Metal processes, P
hot
Mineral product P
manufacturing,
nonmetallic
21 212 Mining P
72 7223 Mobile food S S S S S S S S S See
30 vendors zoning
districts
for
conditions
T T T T T T 23 2361 Model home units
15
71 7121 Museum P P P P P P P P
1
45 4511 Music store P P P A P P P
4
A A 56 561 Office P P P P P P P P P P P
45 4532 Office and P P P A P P P P
1 computer supplies
99 999 Offi road P P
recrea6onal vehicle
use
11 1113 Orchard, tree P P
fanning,
commerc�al
32 3221 Paper/pulp mills P
1
48 4859 Park-and-ride P P P P P P P P P
faciliry
45 5222 Pawnshop P P P P
98
81 812 Personal service P P P P P P P P
45 4539 Pet shop P P P A P P P
1
32 3241 Petroleum and coal P
1 products
manufacturing
54 5419 Photographic studio P P P A A P P P
2
32 3251 Piastic and rubber P
1 products
manufacturing
32 3261 Plastic injection P
99 molding, thermoset
32 3261 Plastic injection P P P P P P
99 molding,
themnoplastic
32 3261 Plastic injection P
99 solvent molding
49 491 Post office, postal P P P P P P P P P P F
center
22 221 Pawer plant P
(excluding public
utility facilities)
56 5614 Print shop P P P A P P P P P
3
32 323 Prirrting, P P
reprographics,
bookbinding
services,
commercial
48 4884 Public pay parking P P P P P P
9 garage/lot
P P P P P P 22 221 Public utilit�r P P P P P P P P P P P
disfibution fac�lity
S S S S S S 23 237 Public utility S S S S S S S S S S S SVMC
transmission facility 19.40.030
71 7139 Racecourse P P P P
9
71 7112 Racetrack P P
12
51 5151 Radio/TV P P P P P P
broadcasting studio
48 4821 Railroad yard, P
repair shop and
roundhouse
72 7212 Recreational C S SVMC
vehicle 19. . 0
paric/campground
44 4412 Recreational P P
1 vehicle sales and
seroice
P P P P P P 51 5151 Repeater facility P P P P P P P
1
72 7222 Restaurant, drive-in P P P P P P
72 7222 Restaurant, drive- P P A C P P P P
through
72 722 Restaurartt, full P P P A P P P P P P
S@NIC@
45 452 Retail sales P P P A P P P A A Limited to
_ items
453 manufact
ured on
the
premises.
71 7139 Riding stable P P
9
33 3312 Rolling miii P
2
31 3149 Rope P P
91 manufacturing
32 3252 Rubber P
12 reciamation,
manufacturinglfabri
cation
P P P P P P 61 6111 Schools, public and P P P P P P P
private, K through
12
P 61 6114 Schools, P P P P P P P P P P
professional,
vocational and
trade schoofs
Shawroom P P P P P P
45 4533 Secondhand store, P P P P P P
consignment sales
33 3399 Sign P P
5 manufacturing/repai
r
33 3399 Sign painting shop P P P P P
5
32 3256 Soap and cleaning P
1 compound
manufacturing
56 5629 Solid waste S S S SVMC
2 recycling/transfer 19.60.060
� site �B�
61 6116 Specialized P P P P S P P P Adaptive
training/leaming r+euse of
schools or studios e�usting
structur�s
only. No
expansion
allowed.
P P 49 4931 Storage, seff- P P P P
9 service facility
49 493 Storage, general — S S S S P See
outdoors zoning
districts
for
conditions
Tank storage, LPG S S S S S S S S S SVMC
above ground 21 •40.060
21 2131 Tank storage, S S SVMC
12 critical materia! 21.40.
above ground
21 2131 Tank storage, S S S S SVMC
12 critical material 21.40.060
below gruund
31 3161 Tanning, curing of P
hides and skins
72 7224 Tavem P P P P P P
Taxidermy P P
S S S S S S 51 5172 Telecommunication S S S C S S S C S S Chapter
wireless antenna 22.120
array SVMC
C C C C C C 51 5172 Telecommunication S S S C S S S C S S Chapter
wireless support �• � 20
tower SVMC
31 3141 Textile P P
1 manufacturing
71 711 Theater, indoor P P P P P P P
71 711 Theater, outdoor P P P
56 5629 Tire, recap and P
2 retread
manufacturing
S S S S S S 51 5179 Tower, ham S S S C S S C S S SVMC
operator 19.40.110
(A)
22 2211 Tower, wind turbine C S S S C S S SVMC
19 support 19.40.110
�B)
48 4851 Transit center P P P P P F P P P
C 72 7213 Transiaonal housing
44 4412 Truck sales, rental, P P
22 repair and
maintenance
44 445 Truck stop P P
447
81 8114 Upholstery shop P P P P P
2
( 49 4931 Warehousing A S � A P P Adaptive �� �_ ce�c��ed
� reuse of
existing
structures
. No
expansion
allowed.
32 321 Wood product P P
manufacturing
56 5629 W�ec�cing, recyciing, C S SVMC
2 junk and salvage 19.60. 0
yards �g�
P Permitted Use A Accessory
�nly
R Regional Siting T Temporary
Permit
S Conditions Apply C Conditlonal
Use Permit
(Ord. 08-026 § 1, 2008; Ord. 08-002 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
Tablc 17.80-1— Permit Type and Land Use Application
SVMC Cross
Type Land Use and Development Application Reference
Accessory dwelling units 19.40.100
Administrative determinations by community development director, Multiple
public works director, or building official
Administrative exception 19.140
Administrative interpretation 17.50.010
Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20.80
Building permits aot subject to SEPA 21.20.040
Floodplain development 21.30
Grading permits 24.50
T e I Home occupation pennit 19.40.140
YP
Record of Sun%ey to Establish Lots within a Binding Site Plan 20.60.040
Right-of-way permits 22.130.060
Shoreline permit exemption (dock permit) 21.50
Site pl�i review 19.130
Temporary use pernut 19. ] 60
Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short subdivision or 20.30.060
binding site plan
Alterations-Preliminary and final subdivisions, short subdivisions, 22.50
binding site plans
Binding site plan — Preliminary and final 24.�0
Binding site plan — Change of conditions 20.50
T y� SEPA threshold determination 21.2�.060
II
Shoreline substantia] development permit 21.50
Short subdivision-Preliminary and final 22.30, 22.40
Preliminary short subdivision, binding site plan-Change of conditions 22.30
Wireless communication facilities 22.120
Type Conditional use perrnits 19.150
IlI pl�ed Residential Developments 19.50
Table 22.50-7 — Loading Spaces Required
tlse/(:r�ss Square Teet Rcquired Loadin� Spaces
Industrial, manufacti�ring whvl�sale, ��rarehouse, similar uses
10,000 — 40,000 square feet l space
40,001 — 60,000 square feet 2 spaces
60,001 — 1 �0,000 square feet 3 spaces
Over IOQ,�OC► squar�e feet l space for eacll 50,000 square feet or part thcr�of
Restaurant$
2U,UUU — 60,000 square feet 1 space
60,001 — 100,000 square feet 2 spaces
Over 100,000 square fe�t 1 space for each 50,000 square feet or part thereof
Hospitals, �•UI1V aicscentlnursin� homes and similar institu�ions
10,000 — 40,OOU square feet 1 space
40,000 — 100,000 square feet 2 spaces
O��er 100,00� square feet 1 space fc�r each 50,000 square feet or part thereof
Departme stor�s, retail and other commc:rcial uses
10,000 — 20,000 squ�re feet 1 space
20,001 — 50,000 square feet 2 spaces
50,001 — 100,000 square feet 3 spaces
Over 100,000 square feet 1 space for each 50,000 squaze feet or part thereof
22.110.040 Number, general regulations for permitted permanent signs.
A. Permitted permanent signs shali comply with the requirements of Tabie
22.110-1. No more than the maximum numbers of either freestanding pole signs
or monument sign structures are allowed per parcel.
Table 22.110-1 — Location, Height and Copy Area Requirements
Maximum
Side
Zoning Copy Copy Yard Permit Additional
Land Use Number Copy Area Area
District pe � Hfte+ight Area (ftZ)lLot (ft2) /Lot �tback Required Provisions
Parcel � � (ft2) Frontage Frontage � �
< 100 ft. > 100 ft.
Attached Wall Signs
Institutional Residential * * * n/a n/a n/a Y *25% of
Zones wall area
Single Business Residential 1 n/a 60 n/a n/a n/a Y
Zones
All Mixed Use *25°r6 of
Nonresidential and * nla * n/a n/a n/a Y Wall area
Nonresidential per
Zones building
� Freestanding Signs
Subdivision/Area
NamelMuftifamily All Zones 1" 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y
Complex/lnstitutional
Single Business Neighborhood 1 20 100 n/a n/a 5 Y *Per
Multi-business Business * arterial
Complex (NC) Zones 1 20 n/a 100 n/a 5 Y street
Single Business Mixed Use 1' 30 n/a 100 200 5 Y frontage
and
Multi-business Nonresidential *
Complex Zones (except 1 40 250 n/a n/a 5 Y
NC)
Nonresidential N 1 50 250 n/a n/a 5 Y 'Adjacent
Freeway* Zones to I-90 only
Monument Signs
Subdivision/Area
Name/Multifamily All Zones 1 10 32 n/a n/a n/a Y 'Per
Complex/Institutional arterial
street
Single Business Neighborhood 1" 7 75 n/a n/a 5 Y frontage
Multi-business Business 2* 7 g0 n/a nla 5 Y
,iplex (NC} Zones I
Single Business All Mixed Use 2* 7 90 n/a n/a � 5 Y
and "Per street
Multi-business Nonresidential 2* 7 150 n/a n/a � y frontage
Complex Zones
Other Signs
Directiona� All Zones n/a Na 4�r'a n/aa n/a n/a N
Name Pla�es All Zones 1 n/a 4 n/ab n/a n/a
17.50.010 Interpretation of development code.
Any person may request a formal interpretation of a provision of the development
code, zoning map, arterial road map, prior conditions of approval, or prior administrative
interpretations. All requests for formal interpretations shall be made in writing. The
interpretation shall be made by the community development director (hereafter referred
to as "the director"). The community development department {hereafter referred to as
"ll�e department") shall maintain a file of all wTitten interpretations. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.150 Type IV applications — Text amendments to the uniform development
code.
A. Initiation. Text amendments to this code may be initiated by any of the following:
1. Property owner(s) or theu representatives;
2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or
3. The departrnent, planning commission, or city council.
B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the City.
C. Application Submittal.
1. After submittal of an applicant-initiated applicat�on, the application shall be
subject to a pre-application conference, counter-eomplete, and fully complete
deterrnination pursuant to SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100.
2. After subil�ittal. tile application shall be �l�ced c�n the ne�t a�ailabl�� plailllic�s�
commission agenda.
D. Notiee of Public Hearing. Amen�i.meats to tivs cude require a public heann�� b�ii�rc
the planning commission.
1. Contents of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall including tlle follc��t in`�:
a. The citation, if any, of the provision that «��uld be chan�cd b�� tllc
proposal along with a brief description of that provision;
b. A statement of how the proposal would chan�.� tli� af�f 'ectt 'l� (11't��'1�1
c. The date, time, and place of the public hearing;
d. A statement of the availability of the official file; and
e. A statement of the right of any person to submit written conunents to thc
planning cornmission and to appear at the 1�1�1�1i� I:t"� �}f� tI1L ��1� 111I1111�' CC�1111111'��li)T1 1�.�
give oral comments on the proposal.
2. Distribution of Notice. The department �Ilall c�i�tribut� tl�c noi«� tu 11
applicant, newspaper, city hall and the mai.n branch of the library.
E. Planning Commission Recommendation — Procedure. Following t�le public he��r►�
the planning commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forwar�i ��
recommendation to the city council. The planning commission shall take �ne o1'the
follo�ving actions:
1. If the plann.ing commission determines that the proposal should be adopted, it
may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The
planning cominission may mal:e modifications to any proposal prior to recommending
the proposal to city council for adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planning
commission must conduct a public hearing on the modified proposal;
2. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should not be adoptcd,
it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or
3. If the plaaning commission is unable to take eit�ler of the actions specified in
subsections (E)(1) or (2) of this section, the proposal �vill be sent tc� rit� c�,uncil <<. th�
notation that the planaing commission makes no recommendation.
F. Approval Criteria. The City may approve amendments to this cucl lI ll t111t�S tjl�lt:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to Public �lcaltli, �afet��.
welfare, and protection of the environment.
19.70.010 I-1, Light Industrial district.
A. The Light Industrial designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis
and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility.
1�ypical uses would include technology and other low-impact industries. Light industrial
areas may also include office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall
plan for industrial development.
B. Supplemental Regulations.
1. The otitdoor stc�rage pro�•isions contai►led in SVMC 19.60.060(B) s11�11 apply to
the I-1 district.
2. Mobile food vendurs shall be lucated on/w desi�nated areas ���hich do not
interfere with parking or internal circulation with permission of the property o�.vner,
health certificate and permit.
3. Setbacks.
a. Front and flanl:ing stre��t yard setbacks shall be 20 feet; and
b. Side and rear yard setbacks of 35 feet are required only adjacent to
residential zoning districts.
4. The following structures may be erected above the height limits of this code
provided: (A) the structure is accessory to or part of a building which is a permitted use
in the zone; (B) the structure complies with the height limits in the Airport Uverlay zon�;
and (C) no residential use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribed
in the zone.
a. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevators, stair�i�ays, tanks.
ventilating fans, or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building.
b. Fire or pazapet walls, skylights, f7agpoles, chimne��s, churcll stee�les,
belfries, wireless masts, and similar structures.
c. Structures such as silos, feed nulls, batch plants, and fixeci cranes �� '�11C:11
are used in a manufacttirin� process w�hich utilizes vertical processing and storage of
materials.
d. V�'at�r stand pipes c1I1Cl L�IIIICS (C)rd. 08-017 � 1, ?OU$; Ord. U7-Ul >� 4,
2007).
5. All parking, maneuverin� and outdoor storage areas shall be paved.
Exemptions:
a. Parking and storage areas routinely used by cleated and other hea«�
equipment as approved by the Planning Director.
b. The Planning Director may waive portions of these requirements up�n
recommendation by the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency or the
Spokane Valley Development Engineerin� Division when it can be
demonstrated that the proposed surfacing, such as grass pavers or othcr
technology will not adversely affect air qualit}�, water quality or the
integrity of the parking area.
1�9.7[�.���1 I-��, ��ea� Inr�ustr��1 d�s��ic�.
A,. ��a°�� �����t�ial ���ignated pr�vp��y i� �cha��et�ri��d �y inte��e indu�tri�.I ��ti�i�ies
r��hiel� i�.cl�d� rr�a�r►►��'�cturing, �rc��+es���tg, fa1b����itrn, assembly, fr�ig�t h�n�lin�, �d
�ir�ilax a►p���tion�. I��av�r in�Iustry rn��r l�ve si�nnif��nt n�is� a�.or c�r ���#he�i� impac.t�.
1�. ��g�al�m�nt� �e�u���c�n�.
1. I-� ,������s ��' us� p�rrr�i�ted i� th� I-1 �r�nir�� �li�tri�t, +e�c�pt �s �peci�i�c�ll�
prn�i�d�al in �pp�ndi�� l��A.
2. 111�1a�il� fa�a� vendt�rs �ha�l �ie l�ca�c� c�nl�rithin c��e�i�n�t�d are�.s whieh d� nat
i�terf�r�e with p��.in� +�r int�rr�al circulati�n �ith ��rmi�siar� +��" th.e� prc�p�:t�y ��v�e�,.
healt�x c�rti�icate �d permi�.
�. T`he f+�[��win� ��ctur�� n7a�r �� er��ted �ibav� the �ieig�t li�.i�� vf this �c�+d�
prc��i�eti: �A� th�e ��r'uctur� �� �c�es�sor�r ta or �art �a�`a l��alding� �w�ich is � p�r�nitte�d use
in tl�e �ane; (B�► �a+� s�ctur� cc�n�pli�s r�rith th�e height I�mits i.� the Airpo�. t�v�r���v ��n�;.
�ur►� {�� �c� r�sid�r�ti�l us� �f th� structur�e �h�Il ac���r �;have t��e �ei�h� limits prescribed
in t�� ��ne.
a. I�e�tha�us�.� ar rv�f struct�r�s f�r the haL�sin� c�f e�e�Tatc�r�, s�ir��rays, tank�,
v��tilati�� f�, or �i�i��r eq�i�arr�e�t t� c�p��ra1C� �nd �aint�in a�h�ii��ing,
b�. �ir� o� �a��p�t w�11�, �kyli�hts, fl��pa4��, +c�imr�ey}s, c�7urcl� �t���r��,
belfries v,�ireless �asts, �r�.� s�i�ni�ar �truct��re�.
�. �1��+ct��re� such �s �i��s� �'��d r�ills, b�t�h �lants, �nd fi��d cra�l�s �,v��i��7
ar� u��d in ���ufa�turin� prv��ss whi+�� uti�i��s ��ert���[ prc����sin� and �t�� c�f
��t�r��Is,
d. '�at�r st.�n� �ri��e� and t�. �[3rc�, �$_aI7' � 1, "�f��}�: �7rd. �7-�l � � �,
��1�7).
�. A�ll �arkin�, m�eu���-� �� �utiiuc�r �tar��e �rc�s sh�ll �e �a���eci,
���m�tiot�:
a. P�k�n� �r�c� st�rag� a.r�a� �t��t����F us�d b� �reate� ��d �tl��r �����-
e�uip�n�nt �s appravcd by t�e Plannin� T�ir�ecf�r.
�. T�c �lanni�►� I�ir��t�r �n��° ��aiv� pc�a���� of the�s� r��quic��n�nt� 4���.�'�
r�c�mmendati�n by ih� �pakane �e,�f�na1 +����n A�ir ���nc�� �r the
��r��ari� '�Ja�I�y �e�elc�pm��.t En��r���er�.g ]]i�Pis��ar� w�i�n it catL be
d�m�n�� that t�e p��rpt���c� ���'��i��„ such �� gras� pav�ers or atl��r
tecl�olo�,y �vi11 not �d��r�ely� af�'��ct ai�r �ualit}r, wat+�r ����lity oz� tl�e
�nt�eg;rit�� �f the p�r�i�� �r���.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: consent ❑ old business new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information admin. report X pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 09-006, Banking Authority
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: An ordinance was passed on April 14, 2009 indicating banks
and city personnel authorized to transact city banking business.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 14 the council passed an ordinance that
identified banks and City employees/councilors that were authorized to conduct city business
with financial institutions. That ordinance indicated a subsequent resolution would provide more
specific information. Attached is a more specific resolution.
BACKGROUND:
During 2003 two ordinances and a resolution were passed with conflicting authorizations for the
conduct of city business with our banks. Several staff positions and council positions have
turned over since 2003, which limits our ability to clearly indicate who is authorized to conduct
city business.
The authorization should be to conduct business with our financial institutions and the local
government investment pool rather than listing one bank.
OPTIONS: 1.) Clarify authorizations for members of the council and staff to conduct city
business with financial institutions; 2.} Leave in place remnants of authorizations passed in
2003.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve resolution 09-006.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: There are no out-of-pocket costs to the city in identifying
individuals who are authorized to conduct city business with financial institutions.
STAFF CONTACT: Finance Director Ken Thompson
����
�1�� �� ������ �����
�1'U�iAI"� �t�Ul�, �'V'A,�I�Il"�TT�TU�
���a�u�r���v r��a. o�-a�a�
.� �sv���o� �� �e� ���� +�� s�+��r� v�����r, s�c��� �c��r�rr�,
�VA�:�H�NNG'TQ�I, �lE�'LA�II'�1G �4��II�� �'il"�,�i�TCIAL I�STIT�TTI�N� 'T'�E CITY I�
Ai�TH+�}RL��� �'�Cl C(��3�.1CT' �I�`�tCI�"aiL '�`I�AN�A�TI�NS V4�i�"I�, I�E�L��
��1��� 4..� V11�� �1�1i]�Jall� �-l�1�-1 L.1 1 � �r ���1.� � 7' 1' �7��111t1LI
ALT'I�fl�`I"1�', �PF,AL�CY �tF�i�LU�I(]Ml� 03-U�tO� :4P�3 Cl'THER N'��TTFI��+
R�I�4,'�'�I) "�'��RE'T�l.
�r'�R��4�, th� �ity ��unc�[ �1�.s �r�t�tc�r�ty�, p�ur�uanc tc� �po�an� V�11��= ��utrticip�l C�de ��cti���
�.SS.f}1{l, t� d���re b�� r�e��alu��un �F �i1C:�3 �n�n�i�� e�titi�s. t�xe +�i� rt�a� in�r��t pub�ic �nds with,
i�clud�r�,� d�pr��iti�g �'unds �n�� acc�►unts, ���r�€in� +che�ks fr�� �u�� �c��unts, �nd �utf��ri�i�� Func�
transf�er� �c� ae�d �r�m ��ch ��c�aunt�; a�nd
��RE1�� the +�i� +C��ncil h�s �t�t�ac�ri�yF, p�trsu�� tc� �pa�Can�: ��ll�y �unECi��I +�c��i� se��i�r�
�.55,[I1�}, to dec��r� by r�s�lu�ir�n ti��n�� C�aun�il m�ernher� and +�ity c�f�i��r� ��r�c� n,a� si�,n ci�e�lcs �+i�
I�s�half' ��° the �it;y�; a��
��:��:A� it ts n�ce�s�ary fror� �im�-tc�-ti.�e �� u�da�� �����ck� �'���ci�� ir�stitutit�ns t�e �it� is
�!utl�ori�d t� d� bu�ir�e�� �►w{ith, �nd t�.� ]C��I�fl�� t�a�:,� �'c��n�il ��.�m���r� a���i �it�� ��fr��r� �����a �re
��th�ri��c� ta� sr�� �n �re��alf c�f the �`����.
1�C1�'�' `I'H��:E�"C��E, �ae it r�st�lv��l �i�- tlr� �it4� C'ot��i�.il af t4�e �'it�� c�f �pok��ne �r'�1Ce��, �pok�ne
!��u��y, W�s�i��v�, �s #�n�lc��v�:
S�c_t%on �.. Tl�� �:ity is ���t��riz�d �� us� B���t�cr 8���;, I��Io�unt��n �'es� Ban� an�1
c�fih�r pu�a�i� d�:��sitarkes as li�t�d a�n tl�e �+'ashi�g#�� �'�ab�ic I��p��i� Prc�tection �omn�is�ion 1i�t�i�� �f
ap�rc,����� l.��n��s, f�r ���alic dep�s��:�, c1��c��, a���d l���ki��� f�i�tc� �:r��sfer-s t� �nd �'��c��r� �c�c��an��.
5ect��n�_�. T��c +C:it�° is �3c�tl��ri��cl tc� i���l��t a�� ��u�lic mc�ni�.�� ��•��1� thc Lc��al
�rc�v�r�men� In�r��tnic�n� Pc��l �.nd n��l�� �il apprapri�t� �rt�ri�#��•ti r���te�l t1���°�:�c�.
�e��i�� 3. `�'he f�linv�in� �c�uncil n�em�ber� ar� a���hc�t;i��� t+� tr�ns��rt ��ysi���ss ���ith
Bann�r �anl� an� th� ���al �ic�v���rner�t Inv��t�m��t I'ca�l:
�,.ic��'d 1Viuns�n
�i��a Wil�ite
Rc�se L�e�arYps��.
Sec�in� �#. T�`he ��llc��vi�� City �f�ce�� �re �u�hc�ri�ecl t+� tt�at�s�et �us'sr��ss ���ith
B�nner B�nk �nc� t�� �c�c�l �r��vernm�r�t Invest�ie�t �'�c�l:
I�+�� ThQ�ps�n, F'inas�ee I3ir�e��c�r
�ik� Ja�ks�ri, ���uly �ity li��n���r
Sect��►n 5. R._��1. T� the ��.t�nt that prev�a�u� ��waci� ifi�ati�r��, r�:�c�luti�n� aa��d
ar�ii�a���� are �i�c�nsi�tent a�vi�h t��s� ��t f�rt�� l��rein, io�c�t�t��n� F�e��fu�i�n t�3-��1�, �}iey� �r� r����led.
R�solutior� ��RO�U6 Pa�c 1 ��' 2
DKA F7'
Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon
adoption.
Adopted this day of May, 2009.
ATI'EST: CIT1' OF SPOKANC VALLE�'
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Richard Munson, Mayor
Approved as to form:
Office of the Cit}� Attorne}�
12esolution 09-006 Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business � new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Bid Award — Sprague Avenue Resurfacing — University to
Evergreen Project (#0110)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2009-2014 Six Year TIP on June 24, 2008,
Resolution #08-014; Information Memos on Federal Stimulus Projects at December 16` Meeting
and SRTC prioritization list in January 13�' Council Packet; Public Hearing and adoption on January
27, 2009 of the Amended 2009 TIP; Info RCA in Council's April 8, 2009 packets regarding
Amendment #2 — 2009 TIP.
BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley received $2.89 million in federal transportation
grant funds from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) for the Sprague Ave
Resurfacing — University to Evergreen Project.
The contract documents were prepared under a design contract with Taylor Engineering. The
project was advertised for bids on April 17�'. The scheduled bid opening date is Friday, May 8'
Staff will provide tabulated results of the public bid opening at the May 12 Council meeting.
OPTIONS: 1) Award contract to lowest responsible bidder; 2) Provide additional d�rection to staff
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Sprague Ave Resurfacing —
University to Evergreen Project contract to the Iowest responsible bidder.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS Th CO(�St�UCtlO�l �IIaS� Ot tfl project is 100°!, fully ARRA arant
funded up to �2.89 million.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Neil Kersten, AIA — Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS� (Bid tabulation to be provided at Council meeting.)
�1T`Y �F �P��A�E VALL�Y
��qu��t #or �c��ancil �►cti�►n
I�l�etir�� ��t�e: ��yr �i2, ���� City Nl�n�g�r ���n�ff:
lter�: ��ne�k �If th�a# a��ply: � can�en� [] c�1d ��sin�ss ❑ r���v �usir���s ❑ p�ibli�c ���rin�g
� i��t��rrr��tion � adr�ain. �repc��t �] p�r�din� le�isl��ii�n
���N�A► IT�I�A TITL�: Pr���s�d �m�ndrrien#� t� T�win� Co�d�
�G�V'ERNING LE���LAT�If3h�1; �1IPU�� �.1�
PRE�11��lS C(��MN��L �CT�t7�l T�►K��f; A,c��pt�� �11AJfC Ch�pter J. `� � ir� �QO� ta ��t�blish
t�vu��� r�guf�ti�ns�.
BA�C1���.t��.1NDP �urr�ntly th� �p�k�ne 4l'��1�r� �llurr��cip�l �+��f� re��rires a�V v�hicl�s v�hi�h ��'�
tc�w�d p��su��r� t� p�rli�� ir�i#i�t�d ir�rp�ur�d� ir� th�e Cit� ta b� s��red ir� ��cilities Ic���t�d wi#hin #��
city iir�tits. Th� ���� d��� n�t �rv►�id� a� �exceptic��r f�r �c�l�ce ��������d ir�pound�s �f �unk v�l�ici�s
�r tr�il�r�lm�nuf�ct�r�� f�ame�. �'I�i� �� prQ�le�natt� �ince �c�rr�ntly th�re ,��� �c� ���r �camp�nie�
u�ri�h stora�e f�+�ili�i�� �t�+c�,t�� wi�hir� 5�ok�r�� V�lley'� ��#y �imifi� �r�%cl� are wifling to t�w �ith�:r
j�nk v�hi�1+�� c�r �r�il+�rslrrranuf�ct���� hames.
The Sp�ol��r�e �1a�l�y Pc�1ic� [��p�rtm�n� I��s ��qu�st�d th�t t�e ���nr��� c��d� �� am�rrd�� t�
�Ila+�vv �unk vehicl�s ar�d traiker�lrr��nufa�cture�i �r�rr��� �� b�e t�vv��d #� f��iliti�s vutsjd� the �ity
when tow�d purs��nt t�v � R�li�� in�ta���d im��ut�d. T�ris r�►�r�l� t�iv�; the ��li�� more �i�xik�ility ir�
de�ling w�t�r imp�un�1� �hil�e p�r���erving th� c�nven��r�c� to ��tiz�n� �f h�vinc� per��r��l u�e��c��s
tavv�d �rr� s�ore�d Ic���lly-
��T��hlS: NI,�
f���C)MI'�E�Ji���3 �►,C7��]!� �R 11�O�T���1� �e�uncil !�ons�nsus t� pl��� �r�ina��� orr fu�ur�
��uncil ag��nci� t� �r�er�s� ���akan� �lalfey �1lurricipal �c�d� refa�in� tc� �o�i�� i��itaa���i wmp�unds.
�UC��G�Tl�Ii�AG�+�IA� 1�1�'A�T�:
�TAF� CGNTA�T: lan �h�tr��:y, L,eg��l Irrterr�; Ca�y C��isk�Nl, ��puty �ity A�#�rn�y, PU1ike �QI���s
�pol��ane Va�ley� �`raffie S��`���nt
ATT►4C H �I��TS
1. Prc�pc��ed Arr��r�dnr��r��s t� Tvv�in� ��d+e
DR9 FT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 09-* * *
A1V ORDINANCE AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUIVZCIPAL CODE SECTIONS
9.10.020, 9.10.090, 9.10.100 AND 9.10.130 RELATING TO POLICE Il`ZTIATED
IIVIPOiJNDS.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley previously adopted regulations relating to police
initiated impounds; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valle}�'s Municipal Code currentiy does not distinguish
between police initiated impounds of junk vehicles, manufactured homes, park trailers, and normal
vehicles; and
WHEREAS, the City of Spol�ane Valley's Municipal Code currently requires all vehicles to���ed
subject to police initiated impounds to be stored in a facility located within the city limits; and
WHEREAS, there are currently no facilities withi.n the City of Spokane Valley's city limits that
are capable of accommodating mobile homes or park trailers, and no t�«�ing compan�� �vith � storage
facilin� ���ithin the cit�• limits is �villing to to«� ��ehicles; and
V�'�IEREAS, junk ��ehi�les, mobile homes, and park trailers tc����ed pursuant to a police initiated
impound are less likelv to be recovered immediateh� and so there is no stron;� rea���n tc� store them within
the city limits. r
NOW THEREFUR�, tlie Cit�• Council ot the Cin� of S�okane �'alle��. Spol:aile Cauntti�,
Washingtan, ardains as follo«�s:
Se�tion 1. Purpose. Tlle purpose of this Ordinance is to arnend the Spokane Valle}�
Municipal Code sections related to police initiated impounds to establish separate towing lists for junl:
vehicles, manufactured homes, and park trailers, and allow storage of such vehicles in facilities outside
the City of Spokane Valley's city limits.
Seetion 2. Amending Spokane Valle�� I�iunicipal Cocl� s�ction 9.1 t).020: S�' �'fC 9.10.020 is
amended as foll��t�s:
9.10.020 Definitious.
In construing the provisions of this chapter, except where otberwise plainly declared or clearly
apparent from the context, words used in this chapter shall be given their common and ordinar�� meanings
and, in addition, the following definitions shall apply:
A. "Chief of police" means the chief of police of the City of Spokane Valley, or his/her designee.
B. "City" means the City of Spokane Valley.
C. "City-authorized tower" means a towing service having a valid and current registration filed
tivith the City authorizing the furnishing of police-initiated impounds.
D. "Impound" means the taking of a vehicle into legal custody, pursuant to law.
E. "Police" means any authorized agent of the City of Spokane Valley police department or otller
law enforcement agency having jurisdiction.
F. "Police department" means the City of Spokane Valley police department.
Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 1 of 7
DRAFT
G. "Police-initiated impound" means the vehicle has been impounded at the direction of a police
officer of the City. Police-initiated impounds do not include impounds ordered for evideatiary purposes
bv the Spokane County sherif�s departrnent.
H. "Private i.mpound" means the vehicle has been impounded at the direction of a person having
control or possessioa of the private property upon which the vehicle was located. This chapter is not
intended to cover private impounds.
I. "Registered tow truck operator" means any person who engages in the impounding,
transporting, or storage of unauthorized vehicles or the disposal of abandoned vehicles. (RCW
� 46.55.010('7g))
J. "Tow truck" means a vehicle designed or intended to tow vehicles which are disabled by
mechanical failure or physical damage or are being impounded pursuant to law.
K. "Junk vehicle" rneans a iunk vehicle as set forth in SVMC 7.05.020.
L. "Mobile home" or "manufactured home" means a strvcture, desi and coastructed to be
transportable i� one or more sections, and is built on a permanent chassis, and desiQned to be used as a
dwelling with or without a permanent foundation whe� connected to the required utilities that include
plumbing, heating, and electrical svstems coatained therein. CRCW 46.04.302�
M"Park trailer" or "�ark model trailer" means a travel trailer desi�ned to be used with
temporary connections to utilities necessar�o�eration of installed fi�ctures and appliances. (RCW
46.04.622
Section 3. Amendin�.S�okane Valley Municipal Code section 9.10.090: SVMC 9.10.090 is
amended as follows:
9.10.090 Secure storage facility.
All City-authorized towers performing police-initiated 'unpounds shall maintain a building that
the business occupies, either continuously or at regular times, where tow business books a�d records are
kept and towing business is transacted.
All towing businesses performing police-initiated impounds shall maintain a secure storage
facility approved by the Washington State Pa�rol for the pwpose of securely storing towed vehicles. The
� storage facility for class A Citv-authorized towers must be located within the City limits of Spokane
Valley to ensure convenience to City residents in the retrieval of vehicles impounded at the direction of
the police department. Storage facilities for class B and C Citv-authorized towers need not be within the
City limits of Svokane Valley_ The place of business and storage facility shall comply with all applicable
state laws and regulations.
All vehicles impounded within the City as police-i.nitiated impounds shall be placed u�ithin the
storage facility of the towing business performing the impound, and shall remain within the storage
facility� until disposal or duly authorized order for release of the vehicle. (Ord. 04-001 § 9, 2004).
Section 4. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code section 9.10.100: SVMC 9.10.100 is
amended as follows:
9.10.100 Towers aut6orized for police impounds.
A. The police department is authorized to establish and mai.ntain a list of City-authorized towers
that qualify for police-initiated impounds. City-authorized towers �ti�ho meet all of the following criteria
shall qualify for police impounds and be put on the police tow list:
1. Meet all other requirements for registration under this chapter;
2. Possess a current letter of appointment from the Washington State Patrol for Zone 2;
3. Pay the annual registration fee. This fee shall be set by resolution of the city council. The
registration shall expire on December 31 st of the year for which the license was issued and there shall be
4rdinance 09- Amending Towing Page 2 of 7
DRAFT
no prorating of the license fee. The registration fee is a cost-recovery mechanism for contract
administration; and
The police tow list shall be reviewed at least annually to determine if each tower listed thereon
still possesses a current letter of appointment. City-authorized towers qualified for police impounds shall
be rated class A, B, or C registered tow operators according to the criteria sQecified in this chapter.
Not�nst in this section shall be construed to r p �verit_ a tow� cam�an�� from re isterine fis more than one
class of tow operator.
B. Class A List.
1. The list of qualified class A registered towing businesses kept pursuant to this cllapter shall be
used in connection with police-initiated impounds Qf vehicles which are not junk vehicles, manufactured
homes, or park trailers within the City.
2. When a person makes a request to the police department or police dispatcher for towin�,�
services when the vehicle is not subject to police-initiated impound, the request shall be treated as a
no�preference matter and the request shall be referred to a qualified class A registered tow operator in
the same manner as if the police were requesting the towing service pursuant to a police-initiated
impound.
C. Class B List
l. The list of e�ualified class B re�ister�d towin¢ buswesses kept pursuant to t� chapter shall be
used i� connection with aolice-initiated impounds of iunk vehicles within the Ci ,+.
2. U�on determinin� a police-initiated impound is necessary, the police officer shall specificallv
state if the vehicle to be towed is a junk vehicle The dispatcher will relav this information to the
�puropriate Class B Citv-Authorized tow�er in accordance �vith this chapter.
D. C1ass C List
1 The list of qualified class C reRistered towing business ke�t pursuant to this chapter shall be
�.:�,d in connection with Qolic.�initiated imnounds of manufactwed homes and park trailers within the
C�
2. Upon deteiminiug a police-initiated im.pound is necessary, the police o�cer shall saecificallv
state if the vehicle to be towed is a iunk vehicle The dispatcher will relav t.h�s information to the
e,p�ropriate Class B Citv-Authorized tower in eccordaace with this chanter.
E�. All referrals t�ef-s��isee�i �' ^� �`'_` ��''A�to class A Cit,y-authorized towers shall be
distributed on a rotation basis among qualified class A�-��e�ed-towers. All referrals to class B
Citv authorized towers shall be distributed on a rotstion basis amon�qualified class B towers. All
referrals to class C G�..,ty-Autborized towers shall be distributed on a ratation basis amone aualified class
C towers.
��. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to preclude any person from requesting the
services of a towing business of their choice, unless, in the opinion of the police department,
accommodatine such request ��•o�ild result in undu� delay or the maintenance of � hazardous sittiation or
condition.
I G�-.. Class A Cit��-aut�lorized towers sllall ob�e.�r��� tl�e follo«•ing practice� anci procc:dures �ti�hen
engaged in police-initiated impounds:
1. When called by the police department, ihe tu��� business «ill disp.�tch a to«� truck «�ithin five
minutes and be moving withi.n 10 minutes during norniaJ business hours;
2. Tow trucks dispatcbed at the request of the police department after norrnal business hours �� ill
be on the move within 20 minutes after receiving the call;
3. The tow truck that is dispatched �vill arrive at the stated location within 30 minutes;
4. If for any reason a City-authorized tower is unable to dispaicb a tow truck within the stated
time or if the dispatched truck will be delayed for any reason, the operator shall so advise the police
department stating tbe reason and estimated time of arrival. In the event the tow truck fails to arrive at the
scene within a reasonable time, the police department will contact another tow operator to respond to the
scene and �ti�ill cancel the original tow;
Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 3 of 7
DRA FT
5. A City-authorized tower on rotation who is unable to dispatch or arrive within the times stated
in subsections (Ex 1), (2), (3 ) and (4) of this section will forfeit his tum and be placed at the bottom of
the rotation list as if he had responded;
6. Consistent refusal or failure of the class A registered tow operator to respond to calls from the
police department for to«�ing services may result in the removal from the list of qualified class A City-
authorized towers;
7. The City-authorized tower shall advise the police department when the tow� company is
temporarily unavailable to respond to rotational calls with a class A, B or C tow trvck. Unavailability
may occur due to conditions sucb as, but not li.mited to, other tow truck commitments, tow truck disabled
and/or under repau, unforesee❑ driver shortage due to illness, etc. The period of unavailability may last
less than an hour or much longer. The tow operator will give the reason for unavailability and
approximately when the company will be available to respond to calls;
The tow company will be removed from the rotational list and will not be called until the
operator advises the police department that the company is once again able to respond to calls v�•ith an A,
B or C class truck. In all such cases, the tow company will resume its normal pasition on the rotational
list ���ithout regard to any missed calls or its position prior to being unavailable;
8. The tow operator will advise the police department whenever a private call is received for to«�
with circumstances that indicate that the tow is for a vehicle which has been involved in an accident on
the public roadway. The tow operator also will advise the police department of all private calls to motor
vehicle accidents on private property resulting in bodily injury or death;
9. The tow operator will notify the police department before moving any vehicle involved in an
accident on a public hi�hway or street under the jurisdiction of the police department or where it appears
that the driver of the vehicle to be moved is under the influence of intoxicants or drugs, or is other���ise
incapacitated;
10. When the police department is in charge of an accident sceae or other such incident, a to«�
operator shall not respond to the scene unless his services have been specifically requested by the police
departmeat, the driver/owner, or his ag�nt;
11. The tow operator shall be available, or will ensure that specific employees are available, 24
hours a day for the purpose of receiving calls or arranging for the release of vehicles. This does not
require the tow operator to maintain a staffed facilit}� 24 hours a day, only to have staff available to
receive calls 24 hours a day. Business hours will be posted conspicuouslti� at the aperator's place of
business so they can be seen during business hours and nonbusi�ess hours;
12. The operator shall post a current copy of tow and storage rates arising from police-initiated
impounds in the following locations:
a. At the entrance to the place of business, in a conspicuous location, plainly visible and readable
by members of the public, whether the business is open or closed. If, in order to meet this requirement,
the rate sheet must be placed in a location exposed to the elements, it shall be protected so as to remain
legible;
b. Inside the business location, where business is commonly transacted. The rate sheets shall be
posted in such manner as to be cleariy and plainly visible and readable at all times by customers of the
business;
c. A copy of the current rates will be sent to the police department. Notice of any change(s) in
service rates will be fonvarded to the police department at least 10 days before the effective date of the
change(s);
d. In the event that an operator has only a class B truck and utilize5 it for class A and B ty�pe
tows, the operator shall file a rate sheet that specifies the rates charged for the different types of tows.
Wheaever any operator utilizes a larger truck thari the towed vehicle warrants, the operator shall
charge fees based on the size of the towed vehicle, not the size of the truck used. Example: A class C
truck is used, at the operator's discretion, to tow a class B truck size vehicle. The fees charged shall be
those for a class B, not a class C;
Ordinance 09- Amending 'Iowing Page 4 of 7
DRAFT
13. Unless other arrangements are made with commissioned police personnel at the scene, all
vehicles impounded by order of the police department shall be taken to the tow operator's nearest
approved storage location within the City;
14. The tow operator will maintain, for three years, records on towed and released vehicles that
were towed at the request of the police departrnent. This record will include, but is nat to be limited to:
a. An itemized receipt of all charges for the services provided:
b. An inventory sheet or eopy thereof made out by the police oi�ficer at tile scen� of the to�ti� and
signed by the operator;
c. All other records required by the police department.
Such records will be available for inspection by the police department during normal business
hours at the operator's place of business;
l 5. The tow operator will sign an inventory sheet made out by the police of�icer at the scene. The
to«� operator shall obtain from the officer, ��cl thc o�tirer �l.�:ill �?rc���ide, a;i�ned authoriz�tion for thc
impound as required by RCW 46.55.080(�):
16 Tow operators shall perform t ��11111� la��� C�+III(1�'i�llt�� �i::�t�l'�lli1'� l�` �t 1 ,ti,;;ilil�:��� �+�
care within the towing industry;
17. No City-authorized tower, employee or age«t sliall it�isapprupriatc, �� ruci�t�ull}� c:��n�� : r� t� �
his/her own use, or abuse property belonging to another and entrusted to his/her care or storage;
18. Tow trucl: operaiors �vill use emergency lights to �varn other motorists only when at the sce����
of accidents, disabled vehicles and/or recoveries. Such lighting shall not be used when traveling to ��r
from the scene;
19. Tow truck c�;-�������,�:�� �!���1( h� r����;����.;h:� f�7r �l:,;f�ii ,�:;�;;ic��it'�r;�i;]::lt _;��I�:. i,� Ct�� �:�ll�l��
glass and debris;
2�. ►S�?EC1fIC OpCI'��illl� I �ill�l���t ll;�lil!!":;lll::llt�+, �i il�li�j� Cla�ti, iiC� '.:� �ullU�� �:
a. The standard air brake release tools (caging stud assemblies) required to be carri�:i in ���� cia�;
Band C trucks shall be used, whenever necessary, to preserve potenrial evidence involving bral:�
equipment or adjustment settings.
When a tow truck operator is attempting to move a vehicle equipped with locked spring parki���
brakes that cannot be released by external air suppty, the caging assemblies shall be used to release th :
brake tension. Under no circumstances shall the towed vehicle's brake assemblies or adjustments h�
moved or disturbed in any way that will ,�:�.����u 1:�._r �3�tcrl��i��;�Fi�.�>> ;:` t!�� ��r�-a��i..��ni ��: i�
settings.
b. Class B trucks in excess of 23,0(1U puuntia gr��„ ��l�i�.l< «ei�l�t ra illl4J' I1tC�I IlUI �;:���►-� J��lli��
when towing or recovering heavy vehicles.
c. Class D, E and S trucks shall not be used to respond to initial calls unless specificall��
authorized by police personnel at the scene or by local written policy approved by the chief of police.
d. Class E trucks shall:
i. When used for multiple vehicle towing/recovery (c�n� ��n hcd. �n� in to���l, �11 in��oice ch.�r`���
shall be eveoly divided between the vehicles so transported;
ii. Not be operated in excess of either �ro;� ��ehi::l�? «��i�_E11 racin�� or ����r�:h;�`�c� t,:�n�►.:`,� «<i`}lt
limits;
iii. Be required to carty its portable liglits onl}� «tien used in a to" in� �i��>de:;
21. Whenever a special event or overflow storage lot is approved by the police department, the
City-authorized tower shall maintain personnel at the lot 24 hows per day for security and vehicle and/or
personal property release. If necessary, reimbursement for such labor sha11 be part of the contract for tlie
special event, if appropriate, or by amended stora�e rates «�ith a���aiver of the 10-dati• rate change notice
requirement approved by the police department.
At the conclusion of a special event or o��erflow situation, all ��ehicles not reclaimed by tlie
otiti�ner shall be towed to the City-authorized tower's regular storage facility and processed in the nonnal
Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 5 of 7
DR9 FT
fashion. No additional fee shall be charged for to�ving the vehicle from the overflow lot to the regular
facility;
22. All work performed by the operator and/or employee shall be in the most professional and
expeditious manner. All invoices and other required forms sba11 be completed accurately and promptly.
H. Class B City-authorized towers shall observe the same practices and procedures as class A
tOwers wheo performin�police impounds with the followiri� exception:
1. Unless other arrangements are made with commissioned police personnel at the scene, all
vehicles impounded by order of the �olice department shall be taken to the tow operator's nearest
avproved storage location. That storage location need not be within the ci limits.
I. Class C City-authorized towers shall observe the same practices and procedures as class A
towers when performing.uolice-initiated impounds with the following exceptions:
1. Sections G�11 and G�1 of this chapter shall not apply to class C towers
2. The tow truck that is dispatched will arrive at the stated lacation within 24 hours;
3. Unless other arrang.ements are made with commi.ssioned police persoaael at �he scene, all
vehicles impounded by order of the police department shall be taken to the to�v operator's nearest
approved storage location. That storage location need not be within the ci limits.
J�. Records kept on City of Spokane Valley police-initiated impounds shall be available for
inspection by the police department dwing normal business hours. (Ord. 04-001 § 10, 2004).
Section 5. Amendin� Spokane Vallev Municipal Code 9 S�'1�'IC 9.1 G.130 is
nmended as follo�ti�s:
9.10.130 Fees c6arged b�- tow operator for police-iniNated impounds.
The schedule of maximum fees shall conform to, and nat be more than, the schedule of
maximum fees then in effect by the Washington State Patrol. The schedule of maximum fees may be
adjusted periodically by the police chief to conform to any adjustrnents made by the Washington State
Patrol to its schedule of maxi.mum fees.
� Any class B or C licensee shall not exceed the fees of such schedule for services rendered at
the request of the police department or its dispatcher. Gharging fees in excess of those specified in the fee
schedule, or charging for services not actually rendered, may result in suspension from the list of class A,
B. or C City-authorizec� towers. Private impound fees are set by the tow operator and r�ecorded v�•ith the
Department of Licensing in accordance with Washington State Patrol �uidelines, and are not intended to
be covered by this chapter. (Ord. 04-001 § 13, 200�).
Section 6. Severabilitv. If any sectior�, sentence, clause or phrase of this Urdinaiice should
be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of an�� other section, sentence, clause
or phrase of this Ordinance.
Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinanc�e shall become e�ective five days after
publication of the ordinance, or a summary thereof, in the official newspaper of the City.
Adopted this day of 2009.
City of Spokane Valley
Mayor, Richard Munson
Ordinance 09- Amending Towing Page 6 of ;
�� ��
A►'�'1'��T;
�ity �l�rk, +��r�s�ine Ba��br�d,g�
A�pr�u�ed ss #a Far�n:
C�f�c� �f th� �it,� Attc�rne��
C�r��anc� (?�-� �tn�n�i�� Ta��•in� F��� 7�f 7
. CITY OF SPC)KANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12. 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old �us�ness ❑ new busncss ❑ public hearing
❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending leg�slation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spl�shdown 2009 Contract Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Six-r��onth contract extensior� �pproved in 2008.
BACKGROUND The City has proposed to simplify the process by asking for an annual
lump sum lease payment generally based upon payments from the past five years,
rather than percentages based upon various revenue streams. Splashdown is in
agreement with the proposed contract.
Contract Hiqhlights:
-Contract term is a ten-year contract with two five-year renewal options.
-Contract provides parking for Splashdown in Valley Mission parking lor
-City assumes maintenance responsibility of the south parking Iot. E� ,� :� �:_> ��� ._� :- �� c� .,�:�� �
and Valley Mission park guests will use this lot as well for overflow parking.
-Lease payment will be an annual lump sum, beginning at $40,000, payable in 1f���e�
equal payments that increases every two years for the first six �,r�=.��� ��� t���= � Jf1T(�c3 ��:t.
topping out at $46,000 per year for the ten-year term
-Lessee continues to pay for all operating expenses anct r�::.�.
-Rema�ncier of �greem�nt is simil�r to nrevious agrnemert
OPTIDNS: Aciv��nce contr�ct to f��1ay 19, 200� ag�nda OR Pro�� icie �dditional direcfian
to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION Consensus to place the Splashdown cor�tract
on the May 19, 2009 aaenda for ap�roval.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Reverlue to City.
STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, Director of (�ar ks and Recreation
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Contract
�'A�'�R SL�D� A�+��;EIV���T
�'��� .�.��E�'IEN�, r��ad� ��d ��ter�d �tc� �s � day� vf 1'�'la�� �d��J�, bv �d
b�t�r��n +�ity c�f Spokar�� �r'�Il�y, � r��unicip�li�y �f the Sta�� of �a�kur�,�tr�n, havi.n�
af�ie�s f�r the t�a.��a��i�n c�f l��asin��s a� 11 �f�? ���t Spra��� �r�F�r�u��, Suite 10�, �pc�kar�e
`�r''alley, '�V��ir�gtan, '��2�3�, ��rein��r ref�rred to �s th� ""+���`"�'",�" �nd Spl�s�-�]��,�
�c�nc���a��ts, ��e. ��wtng �a�i�c�s f�or ��e tr�ns�c��+�r� c��` k�us��ss at ���� �c�ut� ��nito
��ulev�r�, �pc��C�r�e, '4���1��C7�t�an, �9�(��, ��e�einaf��r r�f�rr�ecl t� a� the "�J�S���,
�t�in�ly, her�in�ft+�r ref�rr���l �o �lo�.� ��th t�� �'I��'` �s ih� "P�-'��tTIES."
'W7T']'��55�7'�:
'V�V����'� pursu�� tc� tfa� p�r��r��ic�r�s �� F�+C�W 3��.1 I.�2+�, a��ty n�a�� ����� �r
��11 �n�r �ark pro�����, �uildin,�� c�r faei�itie� surpl�s t� its n��d�. �r nc� lc�r���� �u�t��ble ��r
�ar� p�urpv�+es; a�d
�I�l�:�►�, �ity ��� �pQ�ane V�l�y �� t�� c�����r of: �'al.l��� 1'�i�s��n Fark,
�ac���d �t 1142� ���t 1"w+Ii�sian, 5p�ka�� V�.11�y, �'�shingt�n which t��e �ity�. �equired
�al�e�� l��Iissi�r� Farl� �r��n ��c��an� �"au�t�� u��n �nc�rpc�r�tt�n �.�f t�ie �ii�� it� ?�1��: �n�l
'4'�����A�� d C�1°��.P�1 �C}Pf.l[?Tl �}� �'`�I1��' �1r'�1S51C111 �c�C�► �h dec:lz3:ret� s�uplu� tc� �h�
pre�ent ar�� �+���se��ik�l.� ��e�i +�� �p�+�l�ri� ��aun�y �r� �� Bc��rd c�� �`��flt� ��n��i��i�ner�
c�f Spo�k�.ne +�c��ir�t� p�ur�ua�� t� �.esc�lutit�n 1�1�. �?-����; ���
W.E3�E�l��i�, p��rs�.'�n� t+� ����aluti�an N�. ,���Q4��, ���� Bo�+d +�f �c�u���y
Cr��lrini��i�r��r� au�h�ri��� +��t��u�%+�t� t�f � 4�ater ��ide �i�r�ea�ent �ith ��l�sh-I�+a�n
�o����s��oz��, �nc:. �ur��r�.t tc� �,°hich �pP��h-'�a�rn Cc�n���sican leas�e� a p�r�i�❑ �f ��11���
�'ii�si+�n P'�rk ��r � p�riv�i �f t�ra �1(�� ����.� to �c�nst�uct a�d c�p�rat� a �.vater �lid�� ,and
�''���A�, purs�ant t� ��es�Iut��n �'+Ja. '��-� (�1$, �h� Ba�'d �f �oun�y
��n�n�is�ec�r��r� ��r1:��ri��c� e�e�c�t�an c�T a�afih�� 1�at�r �lide ��re�rne�t w�th S�Ia�I�-
Dc�wn Ccrnc�ss�t�ns. I��. pursu��t tc� ���hi�l� �������D�� +��n�cessi�ns lease�d ���art,i��t c�t
'��lley 1'vfiss�on F�:rk f�r � ��b��qu�ent ter� �ft�� �1�� y�ars �a v��rate � ��ate� slid� ���ch
��a�+� t�rr�in��ir�� c�n ,T��'�r � �, ?��?: �d
'Nr'I����►►,�, The �a�ki�� �:���u��r� � r�p�a���r�ent ��r�ern��t in ?{�(��, for � ;��r�a�
�+f �v� ��� �ear� �n� ��id ����em�r�� ��as c�n��y�d tv tI�� ��#� c�� ��c���� ��alte�r and
�ubs�qu+�r�tlya t��e 2��� A�r�ement te�rr�t��t�� by its t�rms on Jul�r �(l, 2��7..
I��O��', T�IEI��[[��� f�r �-t�i ir� c�nsider�tinn c�� th� nlu�ual }arc�rnt�e� set for
��r��� �the P�.��'I�S her�fic� d� rr�utu�I� a�r�� as ��lln����:
�ectic�� l, �_u'b�ect A�nd Purpo�e - Th� GI`�'°'�` le,�se to L���L��, su���ct tc� the t�rr��� a.nd
cc�ndit��n� l�erein c�rntair��c�, ���t.� r��1 prc+perz:r in �'�I�y 1'��s�ic�r� Parl� l�r�at�d �t
�
11=��� Ea�t h�iissi�rr�, �p+�k�� �Ja��ey �'ashin�tc�n, an� rr��r� p�i�cr�larly� desc:�ib�d ��
f�l lc���r�:
T��at ��r�ic��l o� �3����� 72, ��, 7� ��i�xg ��urt�� �� �l�t� �����f�y �n� Bl��l�� ��,
?9, � 1�nd S� a11 1� Pir��cr�� Fi�st ��dit��an accur+dii�� ta �1�t h�r�c�f r�e�arc��d � B��rk
�"�vi°" c�f �"��t�, I�a�e ��. '�pc��.ane �C��r�ty, �a:�hirt�tvr�. "T��et�er urith tl��t �ar�:�€�n c�f
�,s���ted Jc�h�s�rr Stre�et �dj�inin� sai�d �lnc�:s.
E�c+�pt t��►� '��'es�t 110� f��t c�#` ��i� �lr���€s ��� 7� 78 and ��; a.l��a, �xc�pt the �a�t
�=��.7 f��t �f ��i� �lc��k� ��6, '79� �nd ��� �,1�� ��c��t th�t pQ�ti�n c��" s�d Blc�+��. �� �nd
���c�ted Jc�hn�c�n S�re�t �ncl�ded rrv�thin t�� �:�istin� ter;��i� ��urts.
�.'��tai�in� �.�b ��re� mv�e +�r l�ss.
Her�ina�t�r r�f�rred tcr as t}�� "'Premis�s" f�r th� �ur�os� c�f c�nsti-�ctin� and
c�p�r�tin� c�n� v��vat+�r sli�de �r �li�,�s and r�l�t��d 1�d��a�i�� us�s. Th� I.��SS.��; is
�r�n�ec� � coa�cessian r��ht �c� se�.l fc�ad, s��it dr�nks, act��v�e w+ear �nd sc�u�r�nir� �on th�
pr�rnis�s ���1si�t�r�t u�ri�h +���ratio� af th� �Fat�� �li�i�.3.
ri ����� .��r��m�n.t #c�� F�r�i:rr� Lc�t, �:J��+�uted ����,�t 7, ?��1 ������en Sp4�.an�
��c�rit�� s�d L�:�SE�, Spak�n� �c�ur�t}� Resc�lutiar� n�ar��a�� C� 1-{}°� ��, e�pir+�c� r�n Ju��� ��,
?�(�?. �r�d r��as �r�� r�n�e�red.
LE��EE ar�d it:� c�ient� �ar� pe�n-�itt�� tc� usc� �ttle ���ved ��rl�.ir�,� l�i� ir�.�di�ttel�F
�t��a�:�t1� 1.D IVIlSSi[�� ��►r,"�, Ci �l�fl��7 �I7C�. SC]Ll��} fU� �3��5�� C�1r�C�I� r�la�ed �� t��e ��erati�r�
a�� �c�rr��a1 r�s�. c�f �hc: wat+�rparl�, �u����t tc� a1I tc�n�iti�n� s�t fc�rt�� in t�Y� ���k�� '�.�Il�y
���i��p�� ��t��. 7��� Cit� r���rtf�s th� ri�}��t �� de�i�nat� �pac�� �°or sp��c�fic us�s whi�h
r�,ay pl��� lir�itati�an� �n us� b� ��lash�c�v�n. LE�SEEE is nc�i p�r��itt��. t� �3ri�r� c�u���c��:
c�f t�e p�'�:i��, lat area, �u�� �s an th� �r�ss +ar sid���ta�k�, withc�ut ��e�ifi� �tt�n
�e���issic�T� frt�r� the l�ar�.s I]ir���or.
'�cctian �. 7���n - "�he in�tial term �t t�his �,�C'�+�111�T1'� �h�li l�� f�o� ��n (I�� y��e�rs
��mr��n�ing �r� 11rf �y 1. 2�1!�'�, �nd ��rr��inat�r�� or� .�gril ��, �� 1�. 7't�is A�re�.rt�ent sh�l�
l��v� tw� �d�i�i��n�� f v� year ��t`ron peri�+�s,. �ac�i r�f �v��li�� �ay �� r�r��we� �t the
�nutu�� +a�ti�n caf ti�� P��#:ies. F'r��ided, ��w��ver, tl�e ren�v�r�� sh��l �� sul�j�ct t� all
�rc�� ris��ns s�C �c�rih herei�. L����E �hall i.�dlicat� its i�t�nt t� re��ew t�i� � ��.
gi�is�� t�e �"I�"Y at ]���t :�ia� ��) rr�n�n��� �vri�ten r���ice pri�r� t� �be end �f th� uut��� t�rrn.
�ec#�c�n �. �on�tr�ct�a►n r�� 51ide.
�, �ES��E, �.t its s�le� expen��, s���a�j �p�r��� �d m�int�an ���� the Fr��i��� a
u�a��r slid� ar �li��s, t��eth�r ��fi�� ap�r�,�n��e fefi�ing, su���� st� l�nds�apin�,
spl��h �t�o�, ��d �1 related ���ciliti�� a�c� ��.�uipr��t��. I�1a chan�e �r m�a�i��at�or� c�f t�t�
�1�►►n� �nd s�a�ci�c�ti�a�s �u�mitte�i ��� �,����� t�a th� �ITY �� i���r�vrate� herein ��J
ref�����c� shal l be �na�c�� un1e�� �rst �.ppr��v��i �y t�e C�'�. If at �ny� time dur��� the lif�
�f �hi� �t�r��n�e��� tli� I�F�►�EF f��I� �� ��:�e th� Pr�m���� f�r th� �t�r����e �i` c�nstruc�ic��
`�
and operation of a water slide or slides, W1L�lOUt FIISt Obt�11IllII� petIl11�ti1t�I1 II1 �LI'illll 1T��II1
the CIT�', this Agreement ma�� �lt tl�� ('1�1'�''ti ����tic hc j�i'Illlll�t�l�.
B. If LESSEE desires to acid adciitional ilumes, apparatus or uthc:r re�.rc;ational
items or facilities other than those originally proposed, LESSEE shall first obtain writter �
permission for the CITY at least ninety (9�► cl:���� T�r�;{ t�� tl��� �r,trt ��f c,,r,�tr����t►�,��. <�r��i
obtai n al1 necessar` � �,�,-. � �� � , � �� ►. . . ..� _1 � � � � � : t � .
Section 4. Operatiun ��t >ii�l
A. During the term or� tivs Agreemeiit tl�e L�:S�L� shall initiate, coutrac;t tor and
obtain in its own n: . � � ! '_ : �' '. -� -� i' . . - > > , .. � _ . . _ � . . . � _ . _ . � � .
forth in Sectioa 11 �
B. Refuse, el��tric;ity, h�at, li�;tlt�, po���er, tc;l�}�ll�nc; �e:r�ic�, anei �li utii�r �ublic
utilities of every kind furnished to the Premises throughout the term hereof, and all other
costs and expenses af every kind �vhatsoever of ar in connection with the use, operation
and maintenance of the Premises and all activities conducted thereon and the CITY shall
have no responsibility of any kind whatsoever for any thereof.
C. LESSEE shall operate the slide for public use during such months and hours
as it deems proper; provided, however, that hours of operation shall comply v��ith all
provisions as set for in Section 28 (Land Use Action) of this Agreement, such hours of
operation which may be imposed in conjunction v��ith any subsequent land use action, if
any, or Spokane Valley Municipal Code provisions, which may be adopted, whichever is
most restrictive.
D. Any signage must comply with cunently adopted City Code provisions.
E. LESSEE shall not discriminate against a.ay employee or applicant fo1
employment, or patran on the grounds of race, color, sex, national origin, creed, marita i
status, age or presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap or the use of a traine�i
guide dog or ser�rice doe bv a disahled rers�n.
Section 5. F���.
A. The LESSE�: shall pay to the CITY for the initial and renewal terms of t i�
Agreement a lump sum lease payment as described: $40,000 annually for the first tu�� �
(2) years; $43,000 annually for the next two (2) years; and $46,000 annually for th�
remaining six (6) years of the first term. At the end of the first 10 year tertn, these
payments will be re��ie�ved and adjusted accordingly by consent of both parties.
B. The yearly lease payment shall be paid in three e��ual installments, with the
first due to the City on July 5, the second on August 5, and the third on September 5 of
each seaso�.
;
Section 6. Slidc U« - Il is understuod that the �vater slide is a proprietary pru�iuct
of the LESSEE. The CITY obtains no interest therein as a part of this Agreement and
may not use any of its specific plans, structures or components without the expres�
consent of I,F,SSEF. except as provided hereinafter.
Section 7. (����ner�hi� ��f Impro���ments - All impro`�ements and ecluipment placed on
the Premises by LESSEE shall be and remain the property of LESSEE, and the CITti'
shall have no interest therein except as provided hereinafter.
Section 8. Termination - In addition to all other rights and remedies, which the
PARTII;S ma�� hat�e herein or at la���, the PARTIES ma}� tern�inate this Agre�ment as
follows:
Bv I,L;SSCL-:
This Agreement may be terminated b}• ihe LESSEE upon thirty (30 j da} «�ritten
notice to the CIT'Y upon the happening of any one of the follo���ing events:
1. The default of Spokane Valley in the performance of any terms,
conditions or covenants herein required to be performed by the CITY and the failure of
the CITY to remedy such default within a period of thirty (30) days after the receipt from
the LESSEE of w7itten notice to remed}j the same; provided, however, tllat no notice of
termination as herein provided shall be of any force or e�ect if the CITY shall have
remedied the default prior to the expiration of such 30-day period, or if the nature of such
default is such that a period in excess of thirty (30) days is necessary in order for the
CITY to cure the default and shall diligently continue its efforts to correct such default.
In such e�rent, th� C'1TY shall have such time as is reasonably required to cure the default.
B�� CI�I�l':
"I�his Agreei�ient may b� terclli►lated b�' Spu�:aile �'alle} 11pOI1 t�lirt}' (�(1) d���s
«� notice to the LESSEE upon the happening of any of the following areas:
1. The failure of the LESSEE to make any payments of money as reyuirecl
l�ereunder after receivin� ten (1 Q) da��s ��-ritten tlotice of its failurc t� �a�� such m�ne��.
2. Abandoilment ot� the I'remises bti� the LESSEE �uid,�or the continuancc
of unauthorized conduct and operation of the business required hereunder for a period of
five (5) consecutive days. Failure to operate the business as authorizeti herein would be
considered abandonment. Provided, however, that the CITY understands and agrees that
LESSEE'S operation is seasonal and closing the Premises for tbe season or interruptions
in the operation of the ��vater slide due to weather conditions or repairs shall not constitute
an abandonment of the Premises.
�
3. "l'be default ot� L�SS�� in thc; perfonnanc:e of� any ternls, conclitic�i�, c�r
covenants herein required to be performed by the LESSEE and the failure of the LESSE�=
to remedy such default in a period of thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice t�_�
remedy the same. Provided, however, that no notice of termination as herein provided
shall be of any force ar effect if LESSEE shall have remedied the default to the sol�:
satisf'action of the CITY prior to the expiration of such thirty (30) days is necessary i�1
order for LESSEE to cure such default, and LESSEE shall have commenced to cure th��
default �nd shall diligently continue its efforts to correct such default. In stich event.
LESSEE shall have such time as is reasonabl�� rec�uired to cure the default.
�ct�ti��n �. P_�°n �,}� � � „��, ,•, ����- -
, , , . ,..
: 1!1 1:1L �'.��ll ��'! l�ililllit:ll��il \'! lji� il�:,� lllll�;ll . l�l .l.`� �'l\�� Ill`�} �IL1�111 Ilil�
PARTIES shall ha��e their remedies �cc�rciin� tn Ia��� and in �dditi�n sh;�ll ha��e th�
follow�ing remedie-
Ry� [,Il�S��: In the event of termination by LESSEE, and except as
protirided herein, LESSEE shall have the right to remove the water slide, removable
supporting structures, buildings and other improvements placed upon the Premises by
LESSEE at any time within 120 days after such termination. LESSEE shall restore the
Yremises to its original condition during the same time frame allowed for removal of the
structure.
By CITY: In the event of termination by Spokane Valley as provided
herein or at the end of the term of this Agreement, the CITY shall have the right for a
period of ninety (90) days after termination to purchase the water slide, suppor!
structures, buildings and other improvements from the LESSEE at a price to be mutuali�,
agreed upon. In the event the CITY shall not exercise its right to purchase the wat� �
slidz, support stzvctures, buildings and other improvements within the ninety (90) da}
period, the LESSEE shall remove the same within 120 days af�er the expiration of �<<ch
?l.�T•t��.� '�rt�j �"`�: (1��:� 1�,` �1't'T?1���`�: fil �1�. I11"li�l �"1.1 i�il i�lfli� �111��T " f��!,� ���11�i' �����C' 11',''jTl:`
�_ t t 1. . � t rl tl ;. L _
♦:. lll 1�i` `, t♦I1♦ �. i li ��L.11.11l�ll.�. .l l� . �Lll 1 IL�i_ .� l'1 .� lLl��.�. t�. ...�. �.1-. ��.t�1 �i �
l
L�SS�E does not remove the water slide, supporting structures, building and othc �
improvements placed upon the Premises by the LESSEE within the time frames set fortl �
herein, the CITY may at its option, (1) on the payment of one dallar ($1.00) take title t� �
said propzrty; or (2) dismantle, remove and store such property at a location convenie��:
to the CITY and char_._ �,, 1 I I���I��� .� `_��-- ' ��� ��'- ='.._.;`:. . ..���,�, , �, . �-���= � �����_ �,�_'
,�
storing said proper� �
Section 10. Wast� azl�l NuiSa�ice 1'roliibitc;ci - lluriii� th� tc;riii ul this A�Tc:4IIltlli.
LESSEE shall comply w all applicable laws affecting the Premises, the breach i� �
which might result in any penalty on the CITY or forfeiture of the CITY'S title to th��
Premises. LESSEE shall not commit. or suffer to be committed an� �� ::�1 <<>> �� fl�
Premise�. �r nliisanc�
;
Section 11. Se���ers.
�I Parties agree to the fallo«�in� allacation of cosis with regarc� t� se����r:
A. Sewer Capital Facilities Rate: LESSEE shall be responsible for paying all
Sewer Capital Facilities Rate charges (i.e. ERU's) allucable to LESSEE'S use of
the Premises.
B. L�SS�� s�iall pay� all constructiun costs incurrzd to connect new service,
increase service due to expansion of the w�ater slide facilities, and to maintaiil
sewer service. LESSEE shall, at their expense, install an additional water
meter(s) t�� measure the flo�v �f «�ater entering the se«�c�red portion of the
Premis�s.
C. LESSEE shall re-pa}� the City all anlounts previously owed for General
Facilities Charges (GFC), $5,818.75, prior to opening for business for the 2010
season.
D. LESSE� shall hook up to sewer when required by Spokane County, or when
the City, as the owner of the property, is notified by Spokane County that hookup
is required.
E. LESSEE shall pay all monthly sewer char�ts allocahle tv L�SSL-'�:'S us�° of'
the Premises.
Section 12. Notices.
A. All notices, demands, or other �ti� in this Agreement pro��ided to be given
or macie or sent or whicb may be given, or made or seat by either Party hereto to the
other, shall be deemed to have been fully given or made or seni when made in writin�
and deposited in the United Statement mail, certified, postage pre-paid and return receipt I
r�yuested, anc� adcire�se�j as fullo���s:
T�� �'I�I'l': C:it}� of Spukane �%all�ti�
11707 East Sprague Avenuc:, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, Washington 99260
To LESSEE: Splash-Down Concessions, lnc.
2922 South Manito Boulevard
Spokane, Washington 99203
B. "I'he address to which any notice, demand or any other writing may be gi�•en or
made ��r sent to any Party as above provided ma}• be changed by written notice given by
such Party as above provided.
Section 13. Insl�rance. The LESSEE shall prucure and maintain for the duration of the
Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which
6
may arise fron� or in connection w7th the LESSEE's operation and use of the leased
Premises.
No Limitation. LESSEE's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall
not be construed to limit the liability of the LESSEE to the coverage provided by such
insurance, or other��-ise limit the CITY's r�course to anv remedy a�-ailable at la«� or in
equity.
A. Minimum Scope of Insurance
Lessee shall obiai.n insurance ot� the types described belo���:
1. Commercial General Liabilitv insurance shall be �� oil Insuranc�.�
Services Office (ISO) occurrence form CG 00 O1 and shali cover
premises and contractual liability. The CITY shall be named as ac�
insured on LESSEE's Commercial General Liability insurance polic��
using ISO Additional Insured-Managers or Lessors of Premises Forn�
CG 20 11 or a substitute endorsement providi.ng equi��alent coverage.
2. Property insurance shall be written on an all risk basis.
B. Minimum Amuunts of Insura�ce
LESSEE shall maintain the following insurance limits:
1. Commercial General Liabilitv insur�ance shall be ���ritten �vith limits no
less than $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,�00 general aggregate.
2. Pro e� insurance shall be written covering the full value of
LESSEE's property and improvements for their fvll replacement value
« no coinsurance pro�•isions.
C. Other Insurance Provisions
The insurance policie5 are to contain, or bc c�ilc�c�rsed to ront th�� ii�llc����i�l` rr���i:�i���1�
li�r ( 'umm�rcial (ien�r��l I.iahilit�� insuran�t:
1. �l hc 1.l��SI�I�' lI1S111'ZI1C� co��era�� shall b� ��I"1I11�1I'�" llltilll'�111C� a
respect the Gity. Any Insurance, self-inswance, or insurance pool
coverage maintained by the CITY shall hc e�c�ss llf t�l� i.rssrr
insurancc.� and shall n�t cc.�ntri�utc ���ith it.
?. �l�ll� LES��:�'s ii�suralic� shall h� endi�r�ed t� stzte th�it co���rabc shall
not be cancelled by either party, except after thirty (30) days pri��r
«rritten notice by certiiied mail, return receipt recluc.tc�l, ha� heen
given to the CITY.
D. Acceptability of tnsurcrs
Insurance is to he Placed w�th insurers ��•ith a current A.M. I3e�t rutin� ol� nt�t lc`� than
A:V1I.
7
E. Verifics�tion of Co��eragc
L�SSEE shall funush the CITY �vith original certilicates and a copy of the
amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of
the LESSEE.
Sectiun 14. Indemnification and �Iold Harmless. LESSEE sha11 defend, indemnify,
and hold harmless the CtTY, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, suits, actions, or liabilities for inj ury or death of any person, or
for loss or damage to property, which arises out of LESSEE's use of Premises, or from
the conduct of' LESSEE's business, or from any activity, work or thing done, permitted,
or suffered by LESSEE in or about the Premises, except only such injury or damage as
shall have been occasioned by the sole negligence of the CITY.
Section 15. Attornev's Fees - If any action at law or in equity shall be brought to enforce
the provisions af this lease or to enforce or inierpret any of the covenants, terms, or
conditions of this lease, or for the recovery of the possession of the Premises, each Partv
shall pay all of their own attorney's fees.
Section 16. Re airs.
�1. LESSE� shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, at its own cost, and
�vithout any expense to the CITY, keep and maintain the Premises, including ALL
buildings and improvements of every kind which may be a part thereof, and all
appurtenances thereto, including sidewalks adjacent thereto, in good, sanitary� and neat
order, condition and repair. The CITY shall not be obligated to make any repairs,
replacements, or renewals of any kind, nature, or description, v�•hatsoever to the Premises,
or any buildings or improvements thereon.
B. The LESSEE shall control all rodents and other pests that may be on or in the
Premises during the term of this Agreement.
C. The LESS�;E shall provide trash and garbage r�ceptacles and have r�ii�se
removed from the Pr�mises on a regular basis.
D. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations promulgated or enforced
by Spokane Regional Health Department.
Section 17. Insolvencv or Bankruptcy - If LESSEE becomes insolvent, voluntarily or
involuntarity bankrupt, or if a recei��er, assignee or other liquidating officer is appointed
for the business oF the LESSEE, then the CIZ'�' may ternlinate t�lis Agr�ement.
Seetion 18. L�SSEE'S Employees - LESSEE shall conduct a backgroun�i check on all
employees working at the water slide or any concessions operated on the Premises.
LESSEE shall ensure that each employee presents a neat and clean appearance in persoi�
and in dress �vhile on duty on the Premises. The LESSEE shall take immediate remedial
8
action, which shall include terminati�n in the event an}� of LESSEF:'S employees condt�ct
themselves in an improper or inappropriate manner while on duty.
Section 19. Liens - LESSEE shall keep the Premises free and clear from all mechanics'
and materialmens' and other liens from work or labor done, services performed,
materials, applia�ces, teams or power contributed, used or furnished or to be used in or
about the Premises for or in connection with any operations of LESS�E, or any
alteration, improvement, repairs, ar additions which the LESSEE raay m�ke or permit or
cause to be made, or any work or construction by, for, or permitted by LESSEE c�n or
about the Premises.
Section 20. Comvliance with Leasehold Excise Ta�:.
�-1. LESSEE h�reb�r acknowledges that to the e�tent this Agreemznt is subject ta
the "leasehold excise tax" as set forth by RCW 82.29A as now or hereinafter amended,
the same shall promptly be }�ai�i rti� thc I.F:tiSI:F. in �i�jC�itl(�Tl tt� th�� f����s �ct f�rth in
Section 5 of'this Agreement.
B. LESSEF agrees to pr�nlptly pa}� ���hen �iue all tax��, rat��, �har�e� an�!
assessments, special or otherwise and public charges of every kind and nature which ma�
be lawfully imposed or assessed in any way on the LESSEE with reference to tl��
Premises. The LESSEE further agrees to pay promptly when due all taxes imposed c.���
LESSEE as a result of the services provided upon the Premises, includin`.� h<<t n��t li,�lic��j
to, all sales, busines�, occupancy and use taxes.
C. L�SSEE shall also comply with and abide by all iederal, st�te, count� .
municipal and other governmental statues, ordinances, laws and regulations affecting tl��
Premises, the construction, operarion and maintenance of the water 11id� th�r����n. th�
improvements thereon, or any activity conducted on or in such Premisc�.
Sectio� 21. Non Liability of CITY - Theft Bur�larv or Vandalism - The CIT'Y shall not
bz liable in any manner for any loss, injury or dama�e incurred by the LESSEE from any
acts of tbeft, burglary, or vandalism. The LESSEE shall be responsible for providing all
expenditures relating to any security precaution that LESSEE deems necessary for the
safety of the personnel, guests, employees, patrons, or users of the premises, or propert}�
of LESSEE located on the Premises. The LESSEE shall implement securitv measures
sufficient to �ecure the Pre►l�is�s after hours and prevent unauthorized t�s�.
Section 22. Relationship of thz PAR�I�IES.
A. The PARTIES intend that an independent LESSEE relationship w�ill b�
created by this Agreement. The CITY is interested in only the results to be achieved, and
the conduct and control of the services will lie solely with the LESSEE. The LESSEE
�,vill be solely and entirely responsible for its acts anci the acts of its agents, employees,
servants, suh-lesse� or otherwise during the performance of this Agreement.
9
B. in the performance of tbe serviczs herein contemplated, the LESSEE is an
independent Contractor with the authority to control and direct the performance of the
details of the work aad provisions of the services, the CITY being interested only in the
results obtained. Hawever, the services coniemplated herein must meet the approval of
the CITY and shall be subject to the CITY'S general right of inspection and supervision
for the purpose of determining whether the services are being performed in accordance
with the specificati�ns set for herein.
C. No agency, employment or partnership is created by this Agreement.
LESSEE'S business is separate and apart from that conducted by the CITY. Neither
Party will have authority to act for the other in any obligations or elpenses «�hatsoever oi�
the other Party.
Section 23. Venue Stipulation - This Agreement has been and shall be construed as
having been made and delivered within the State of V4'ashington and it is mutually
understo�d and agreed by each garty thereto that tliis Agreement shall be governed by the
laws of the State of Washington, both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at
law, suit in equity, or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement or an}�
provision hereof shall be instituted and maintained onlv in anv c�f thc Courts of com�etent
jurisdiction in Src�kane C'c�unt}'. ��'ashin�tvn.
Section 24. Assi Ilnit',III - E,aC�l Pc1I"ly' t0 1�11S A�ICC'IT1LIll �.11I1C�S LIlEI11S�IV their par��trs,
successors, executors, administrators, and assigns to the other Party of this Agreement
and to the Party's successors, executors, administrators and assigns of each other Part}�
t�•ith respect to all terms, cond.itions and covenants set forth herein. The LESSEE ma}•
not assign, transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the same
being first authorized by resolution or motion of the City Council. A decision by the Citti�
C'ouncil to provide consent or denial shall be communicated to the LESSEE within a
reasonable time frame not to exceed Uurly (30) calendar days of written request. The
City Council's decision shall be made considering, among other factors, the financial
stability, experience in operating/owning water slides and related recreational facilities,
and ability to meet conditions v�rithin this Agreement. In the event of an assignment, the
assignee shall assume all liability of the assignor. Any unauthorized voluntary
assi�nment c�r suh-lease �hall he ��oid, and shall terminate this lease at the CITY'S option.
Seetioa 25. �'ai��cr - No ofticet�, �I11��0}�c:t' ur a�c 'I11 l)f tl�e C`IfI�I' has the po���er, rigllt or
authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this Agreement. The �vaiver of
any breach of this Agreement shall not be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent
breach. All remedies affarded in this Agreement or at law shall be taken and construed
as cumulative, that is, in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. The
failure of the CITY to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this Agreement or to
require at any time performance by the LESSEE of any of the provisions hereof, shall be
in no way construed to be a waiver of such provisions, nor any way affect the validity of
this Agreement or an�• part hereof or the ri�ht of the GITY to thercaftcr enforce each and
even� such provision.
10
Sectiun 26. Nlodilic;ation - Therc; shall be au m�ciificati�n of this A�;r�cme erce}�t in
�ti7itin:.,�. exeruted �vith the same fornialities �f thi� }�resent instrument.
Sectiu� 27. S:��r��hilit�.
A. 11 is uncl�r5toud anil a�re:e by th� I'AIZTIES that if an}� ��art, teisn or pr����ision
of this Agreement is held by the Court to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions
or pro��sions shall not be affected, and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall
be construed and enforced a� if this .A�reeme did not cc�ntain a���rticl�lar ��trt. term or
�I'O�"i�lOIl I1tIl� ll� b�� iil� alid.
}3. If it should appear that any� part, temi or pru��ision hereol 1S 111 C:Ol1t�ICj ���ith
any statutory provisions of Washington, then the part, term, or provision hereof which
may conflict therewith shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may� be
in conflirt there«�ith, and be deemed to modifi� tu conform to surh statut�n� �ro��isions.
Seetion 28. Land Use Action -"I'he LESSE� shall c�mply with all provisions of the
Findings and Order in the Matter of Reviewing the Administrative Action of the Spokan�
County Zoning Adjuster Decision to Approve Conditional Use Person No. CUE-5-83:
Splash-Down, Inc., dated May 16, 1983, c�r �u�h l�tI1�1" ��117C� u�c COI1C�1�IclI1S CeC�llli't',Cj in
conjunction with the use of the Premises.
Seetion 29. Time of t11e Essence - Tirll� i� c�f tl�c �`�ec�ce c�f each �lil� c'1'�i'�' �I'(��'l�l��il
�lt'ft'1i1.
5ection 3U. �11 ��'riting �'ontaiiled I Ier�ir� -
A. This Agreement contains a11 the ternls and conditions agr�ed upon by thc
PARTIES. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of
this Agxeement shall be deemed to eaist or to bind any of the PARTIES. In the event any
language in an attachment which has been made part of this Agreement conflicts or
appears to conflict with this document, it is expressly agreed by the parties that this
�u� Agreement shall control in the resolution of any such disputes.
B. The LESSEE has read and �u�derstands the whole of the above Agreement and
now states that no presentation, promise or Agreement not e�pr�ssccl in ttlis Acre�mcnt
has been made to induce the LESSEE to enter it.
Section 31. Exhibits —
A. Insurance certificates.
B. Findings and Order in the Matter of Reviewing t�ie Administrative Action of
the Spokane County Zoning Adjuster Decision to Approve Conditional Use Person No.
CUE-5-83; Splash-Down, Inc., dated May 16, ] 983.
11
Ii�` WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES ha��c caused this Agreement to be
executed on the date and year set for above.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: SPI_.ASH-DOV�T1 CONCESSIONS, IIvC.:
Dave Mercier City Maaager Name Title:
Tax 1I) No.
A"I :�PPRUVI:U AS TO FURI�-1:
Christine Bainbridge. �'it�� Cl�rk (_)ffice c�f the C'it}� Attorne��
12
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Western Dance Association 2009 Contract Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN N/A
BACKGROUND The City has been working with the Western Dance Association on a
new contract. Their existing contract, which expires May 31, 2009, was originally
through Spokane County. The Association is not seeking any major changes from their
existing agreement. This agreement has allowed for a good working relationship
between the City and the Association. The Western Dance Association is in agreement
with the proposed contract.
Contract Hiqhliqhts:
-Contract term is a ten-year contract with two five-year renewal options.
-Lease payments to be $500.00 per month for the ten-year period.
-Lessee responsible for paying Leasehold Excise tax.
-Lessee continues to pay for all operating expenses and fees.
-City retains usage of dance hall for programs.
-Remainder of agreement is similar to previous agreement.
OPTIONS: Advance contract to May 26, 2009 consent agenda OR Provide additional
direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place the Western Dance
Association contract on the May 26, 2009 consent agenda for approval.
BUDGET/FINANClAL IMPACTS: Revenue to City.
STAFF CONTACT: Michael D . Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Contract
�� � . ! � J � . . � � . � � �\ 1 -� , '•�. ( i ' '�� i � � � . \ � , t � � � `' i 1 � . � \ I
i1i1.5 :�l�1tl:L�1�.:7 i, iila�l� �lii� c:►it�i��� tiil� i�i�} u1 .IIIII� �UU�i, t�y aii�'.
betvveen City of Spokane Valley, a political subd.ivision of The State of Washington.
having offices for the transaction of business at 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite I06_
Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and Westem
Dance Association of Spokane, a non-profit organizativn having ofFices for the
transaction of business at P.O. Box 3052, Spokane, Washington 99220, hereinafte;
refened to as "LESSEE," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "PARTIES."
WITNESSETI-I:
VVHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 35A.1 l.020, a city may lease or
sell any park property, buildings or facilities surplus to its aeeds, or no longer suitable for
park purposes; and
WHEREAS, a certa.in portion of Sullivan Park was previously declar�d surplus tu
the present and foreseeable need of Spokane County by the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County; and
V�rHEREAS, the recreational dance hall located at 1901 North Sullivan Road,
Spokane Valley, Washington was originally constructed by the Western Dance
Association of Spokane, pursuant to a Lease Agreement executed on the 30�' day of
September 1958, however such facility vested in the Spokane County upon ternlination
of said Agreement on the 29` day of September, ] 993; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 99-0454, the Board of County
Commissioners authorized execution of the Sullivan Park Dance Hall Lease Agreement
with the Westem Dance Association of Spokane pursuant to which the Western Dance
Association leased a portion of Sullivan Park for a period of ten (10) years for westem
d�nce activities and related purPoses; and
WHEREAS, ownership of Sullivan Park. incllldin� the recreati�nal dance ha>>
transferred to the Cit}� upon incorporation in 20�3.
tiOW THE�tEFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual prumises s�t turti
hereinafler and as provicl � � � � � - � � � . � T � , ; � , . , :
� - - , _
mutually agree as fol low �
�i��"1'I(1\ �'fl. l � �t�l�.l@ ( � ��i> I't i;E'i>��
I I ,, . : ,, � r � . � .,.. J ; : , l , �
� 11L �1 i� �L�1:�`1 1��� llll L,i_�._'1..1 ,. ���'I�l� ��� �i.L l.i..�� �..1�1 Ll!:1\lill`_�li_ ll`i"i. �1'r��.�i:�:`�_1.
�ertain real property� located in Sulli��an P�rk, ���kane Va11ev, VVashin�ton and le�all�
dc�crihec� a� fnlln«
:�.. � .
i
A portion of land, being approximately one and one-half (1 %2) acres,
located South and V�1est of a point approximately 175 feet South of the
North property line of the property hereinafter described and
appr�ximately 250 feet West of the center line of Sullivan Road, said
above portion located within the following described property:
�I'he following portions of Government Lots 8 and 9 in Section 11,
Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in the County of
Spokane and State of Washington, describcd as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast comer of Section 11, Township 25
North, Ran�e 44 East, V��.M., thence North 0 47' West 925.08
feet alon� the East line of Section 11; thence North 55 ° 50' West
36.60 feet to the Westerly right-of way line of Sullivan Road and
the True Point of Beginning; thence North 55 50' West 916.30
feet; thence North 89 13' East 751.04 feet to the Westerly right-
of-way line of Sullivan Road; thence South 0 47' East 524.91
feet along the Westerly right-of-way line af Sullivan Road to the
True Point of Beginning.
Hereinafler reicrred to as the "Premises" Cor the purpases oi' ���estern ciance activities pui
on by the LESSEE or sponsored by the LESSEE and related to western dance activities.
during daytime and evening hours on weekends and ONLY after 6:00 p.m. on weekdays.
Provided, it is understood that the continuance by tbe LESSEE of the support and
sponsorship of activities set forth in Attachment "A" by the various clubs that make up
the LESSEE, scheduling them for certain times and dates with them contribucing to the
expenses of maintenance and upkeep, heat, lights, etc., of the Premises, is a proper use of
the Premises. LESSEE needs city permission to use prior to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays.
"I�he LESSEE agrees t�lat ihe GITY may administer and conduct any activities on the
Premises during daytime hours of 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. CITY agrees that
such activities will be restricted to those that will assure maintenance, care, and
safeguarding of the dance floor. The Premises include the recreational dance hall, storage
building at the rear of the hall and the carport area on the south side of the hall. Tbe
LESSEE shall additionally be entitled to the non-exclusive use of the parking lot east of
tlle hall and the natural landscape arens around the perimeter of the structures, during the
term of this Agreement. The C1TY will ensure that the Premises are left in neat, clean and
orderly condition and that the recreational dance hall is secure at the conclusion of eacll
such activity session.
SECTIOI�' N0.2 TERMS ANll CONDITIUNS
The t�rn� of this Agreement shall commence on the 1 S ` day� of June 2009, a.nd shall run
for ten (10) years, this Agreement at the mutual option of the parties, may be rene���ed for
up to two (2) additional five (5) year ternis.
ragc 2 of9 I
I
�
F+�r �d i�Y c�r�ider�ti+�n v:� t�e u�� +�� �� Pr��ris�s � set f�r�h ��rein, #he LE��E� �hall
�a�P �h� �c�llt������ �� �n c�r �ef�r� the �'�' �f`�ach n�+�r�th fr�r th�� n�c�r�th.
�"ir,�t y��r t� en� €�f I.,�a�e ........................�......a.....$S�lD.�O� per n�c�nth
�'he p�a�.i�� agr�e tc�, reariew� �s �eas� t�mc�unt �fd�er �.en � � �1� y���rs. �I1 ���e p�y ment�
�h�ll b+� su�j�ct tc� a��5.��? l�t�e ��e� c�u� with th� f�al�c�v��ing n€���.� ��ym�ni. Payn��nt�
sl��.11 b� ��ns��d��e� l�te if tt��}► �r� n�t r�c�i�r�d by t��e City� c�� �pakar�� '��i��y ha�ing
�f�ic�s �t � � ��17 �a�t �"pr�gu�e Ave���, �uite 10�, ��ankane �`�,11���, ����i��tnr� ���O�i.
Pay �rrz�r�ts p��t ���r�e�l b�fc�r� �uc�i �i�t� sh�Il b� c+�n�id�r�� r�cei�r+��d tin���y.
�E�C'�'I�N ��. �; L111����..�►�1�E
I�wc�n,� �h� �e�i+�d c��' t�i� A,�r��:r��n�, �ie �.E�S�� shall �carr�• ar�� �:eep in �c�r�.�, dt its �al�
���r�e � CQI�lI1��I"Gl�� ��Il�d"81 I1��1I1t� ir�sa�r�c� �olic�� witt� t�e minirnu�r� lirr�its �f
�1,�}�{�����} p+�r c�cc�urr�nee with ��2,�D�C�,0��1 a�gt+��at� f�� �c�dity in�u.�yy and �I,f���,f1��}
p�c� c���u� �o� prt�pert�r d��,ge. '�a��cl pc��i�y ��,�.11 b�e �.�vr�tt�n }�y � r�li�b�� i�s�tr�c�
cn�-npar�y �r ��mp�ni�s and �h�ll ��n���e �l�at s�id �c�li�y sh�li nat b� c��eled, rr�a�eri�11��
+���n�;�d c�r nQt r�n����;d ��ithe►ut ���irty (�Cl� days Fr��� nvt��e ih���o�� ta the (�I��'. `t'��
�'IT'� r��e�r�� t�� �i�ht t� a��rc��� th� i������';� ��su.�anc� �arrier(s�. �e �i�Y sha�l �+�
nar��� as � adciit�c��.�i narx��c� ir►s��d i� �1 su�h p��i���� an� th� L���'�� �k��l� prvvic���1
th� �IT`� with ��rtifi�c� r���i�� �,�' ��i� �c�n���ra�� ��� t� c�n�����n�c�rtt�nt �f �z�� �f tl��
Pr�t�is��.
The L�S��E ���all �r�vic�e a�l� �ir� insurance �n p�rsc�n�l �►r�p���� t�iat t�� ���S�E
rnu�r�es ���� �he P�c�e�i��es �nd a �asu��y� �swr�c� d��ir�d �y �E�S�� bath �t �h� s�i�
e�p��.�� ��` �y����� and t�l� �'I�� �ha111���:r� n� r��pon�ibilifi�� ��'h�ts�����r therefor�.
`1'I�� �:1 I Y��surr�c�s re��r�n�i�il�ty� tar pr���;�t�• d����gc� t�r bui���n�, rc����, ���11� ��n�l
fc�und�tit�r� �f th� r�cr�ati�n�I �dar�c� h�l. In additi+�n, the �IT'� ��e�� tc� irademni�'y ar�d
����d ha�e�s t�e ,L�S�EE �c�t� any liabi�i�y far b�dily �ju� �ccL�rring tc� �n��
parti�i���t� in �vs� acti�riti�� �ir��tly ��minist�r�� b�� t)�� �'IT�' �r�ing ats weekd��
s�s�i��s,
�SE�TI[�1� NCI. _�: Ir�derY��ii��a���n and Hc�ld H�n��ss. LES�EE s�l�i �.�f��ad,
i�c���n.�fy, ar�d �c���t ���l�ss ��� �'i�"�� �t� c��'�c��rs c��:i�i�s, e�.p������ a�d �rc�le�nt����
�r�m and ag�ir��t �.n� and ail cl�irns, ��its, ��t�c�ns or lia�aili�ies f�r injury c�r �.��h �f a�y
p�r�t�r�, �r ��x i+��� u� dar���e to gr��ert�, w�ic}� �u•���� o�t +��' LE:��EE's use �f Pr��uis�s�,
�r f`rv�n th� ca�ndu�t v� L���E,E's b�ssin�ss, �r �r�►m �� a��ti�ri�, vv,�r� ar thin� �i�n�,
��r�m�tt�d, �r sui�����3 t�y L.E��EE �. �� �E�out �� �'ret�i�e�� �a�c+e�t �r�1y �u�h ina u�°y c�.�
d�rna�e as sh�11 h��r� b��n c�ccasi��ed ��� the sc�l� ne��i�enc� �a�'the �'IT'�'.
��CTI�I� 1�+I�. � , (]W�E�I-�I�'' �F Il"V�PIt+�"V'�11�E�[�I`�
���� � �����
�
r"�n�� �mprc�r� �er���n�s and p�t��ar��r�� ���ures i����i� c�� �la�:�c� �n the �'r��tais�s �} Ls��SE}�
�iur�n� th� �ern� crfthis 1'�gr�em�nt shall �e �nd ren�air� the p�°��erty �f`the �IT�'.
�E+�TI[]N� 1'�i�, b Z`��II�ATION
�n ���i�ion tc� all �ther r�g�t� a�� rem�rli�:s �vl�u�h ��e ���i�� ��agf 1��ve ���re�n c�r �t l��w�,
t,�e Partie� rn�!�� terrr�in�te this �i,�r�em�nt a,� foll�����:
�4. ��� L��SC�:
T�is A�reern�nt m��r be terrnin�t�c� 1��F t�� ������ u��� 1$U �d�y:� vvTiti�n nc�tice �� t��
+�;it�� �-ith�ut c�us�.
�. ��� ���rr��:
��) This ��r��r���t li�a�r b� t�rri�in�:t�c� 1��� th� ��t��� ot Sp�kti�t�c:� �f��ll�y upun un� �. �) y�e�tr
��rritten n���c�� t� t��� I_�ESS�E �►��itl�c��.�t ������.
�?� This ��r��ment m�� �� termin�tec� �.��� th� C'I��' up�on fi�T� ��} �a�� �vritt�n nc�ti�e to
th� L����E c�r� �h� h�p�p��in� of any �ne� af �h�� fc�llc�wi,r�� e�r��ts:
a. Th� ����ult ��' t�e LFS�EE in the ��r�orrnan�� a��' any ��rms, ��nditi+�ns
�� c�v�r��ts h�r�in ��equYxc��i tc� b� ��rf��r��d ��t �h� ������ an� �h�
f����r� c�f t�i� I.����E tn re�n�dy �uch c���`ault in a p�e�iv�l c��' thirty ����
c��}�� af�.er �r��ei�� fr�� �� ��T� �f wr��t�en �otic,+� t� �errzedy �h� sar��.
P'rc��id�e�d, ho�e�°er. th�t �c� �ZC�tic� af ��r�zinati�r� �� l�er�ir� prvvid�cd �ia�.11
b� c�� a�y f'+�r�e r�r �f�e�t i� �h� L�S��� s�all �a�v�e r��ediec� th� default
p.ri�r t� t�le +�x�it"�ti�r� �f su��� l�iri� per�od �r if �I�� n�.tG�rc �#` s����
cie�'�uit i� s�aclt th�t �a p�r;��d in ��cess �f t�i�ty �3�i�� days i� r�e��ss,ar�r iii
c�rde�r �'ar � L����� t� �ur� s�c�l ci�faul�, �n� tlie L�S�FF ��1a.11 h��•�.}
c�c�nen�e� t� curc: tt�i� cl��'�t�lt �nd sh�l� �ilig�.�tl}� +��niin�� its �f�or�s �c�
�Qrr��� suc� d�fault. It� �u�ch e�:��t, th� �,F.'��I:�` sl��ll 1���F�e �uc�� ti�n�e �.� i�
�e��a�naL�ly r��uir�� tc� +���r�.ti t�i� �ei`��tlt,
���T°IUN �Y(�� 7 : 1�V,�S"�� ,A►.�T:D 1�Ui��N�'� PR���I�ITED
I�uring th� terrn c�f this Agr��rt��nt, t��r� L����E �h�ll �c�m�l�� �vit� all app�i��ble l��vs
�f���ting th� prer��ise�, t�ie l���e��h of ����� n�i�ht r�esu�t in ar�yt pen�It}f on th� �I�s�' ��
kc��#eit��c� c�f �� C�I�'Y'� titl� t� tll�� par�rr�is�s. Th�e L����E ��ail n�t can�mit, �� suf�F�� t�
}�� ��rnmitt�d, �ny �v�te �n t�e pr�mis�s +�r ��ais�+��.
S�E�CT�CI��' �[t�. 8 1�T�'�'I��:�
�.I� ���tices, c�emaa�d�, c�r �th��r wTitiri�� in thi� .�►����e�����li p��a�f��ec� t+� �e �iv�er� �� ���a�e
�r ���t, �or �vhi��i m.�� �� �i���en, vr rr��de or ��r�� 1��� eith�� p�r�,r her�t� �� ��� r�ti�+��, shat�
�� d��m�d ta have �+��� f��II�F �i����, c�r rn�+de c�r ���t ►�her� rr�a�l� in �iti�� an+d de���ite�
r��3�� �� ���
i
in the United States Mail, certified, postage pre-paid and return receipt requested, and
addressed as follows:
To CITY:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Parks & Recreation Director
2426 North Discovery Plac�
Spokane Valley, VVashingt��n 99? 16
"I�c� I.F���(�..
�t�'�5I ll�i���� .a���_���l.a�i�lON ���I� �I�Oh,��NL:
PO Box 3052
���kan�. �'�'ashin�tc�n 99�?f►
1 �1c �l�i�I��» l�) ��'IIIC}1 �1111 11��11C�. �1�Illaila C)1' �.tllti' Ul�i�l' �1'1'lilli�� 111�1� �)c: <_'.1� CIL ��r Ill�l��� (lI'
- - � - �
sent to any party as provided far herein ahcive, ma�� be changed b}r «Titten notice gi��e�1
by such party as provided for herein aho��e.
��:('1'IC)� '.ti�f). 9 ili�:}':�IIZti
l h� I.I�;��f �! tliruu;�l�uut tli� t�rcu ul� clli� ��r��c:il1�►11, ��t it� u��n �u�t an�i ��i�huut
any expense to the CITY, keep and maintain the premises, including the recreational
dance hall, slorage building and carport, all improvements and fixtures of every kinci
which may be a part thereof, and all appurtenances thereto, including sidewalks adjaceni
thereto, in good, sanitary and neat order, condition and repair, except as provided for t��
the contrary herein. The CITY shall not be obligated to make any repairs, replacements.
or renewals of any kind, nature, �r de�crirti�n. «•h�t���e�•er t� the rremise�. �r an�
���iilclin�i� ��r ir.��rc l}l�'f���i1.
.�'�11� �i�1�l��llli�ll�-, 1'��1�.���lll�ili� ;�1� l��'ll�'��;1��. t�l:' [�>i:l� �'�_���i ti�i 1'.�ll�'�l �'�.��'��}� '� � .f !f �ll �Il,l�l
receive prior written ap�r������1 ��1� ci�e c'[ I 1�.
The LESSEE shall provide for snow removal tTOm th� w�alking areas K�hich the LESSLI:
}�as the right to use under the terms of this Agreement. The CITY shall additionall}�
remove snow accumulation from the roofs of the recreational hall, attached carport and
storage building as necessary to prevent structural dama�c: and ice d�uiis.
The CITY may inspect the Premises at any reasonable time for the pu� ot' re��ie«-in�T
compliance h`� the T.F,SSF_.F with the terms of this Agreement.
SECTIU�' NO. 10 LILN�
The LESSEE shall keep the Premises tree and clear fom� all mecha��ics' and
materialmens' and c�ther liens from work or labor done, ser performed, materials,
Pa�e > c�f 9
i
appliances, teams or power contributed, used or furnished or to be used in or about the
Premises for or in connection with any operations of the LESSEE, or any alteration,
improvement, repairs, or additions which the LESSEE ma}� make or permit or cause to be
made, or any work or construction by, for or permitted by the LESSEE on or about the
Premises.
SFCTI01�' NO. 11 UTILITIES
'I'he LESSEE shall initiate, co�tract for and obtain in its awn name and fully and
promptly pay for all electricity, beat, lights, power, telephone service, garbage and all
other public and private utilities of every kind fumished to the Premises throughout the
term hereof. LESSEE shall be responsible for the purchase of building supplies for
janitorial rest rooms, kitchen and similar uses.
SECTiON NO. 12 : CnMPLIANCF �'VIT��i I..FASF.:�-IOLD EXCISE TA,I'
The I.,I��SSI:I: hereby� acknc����ledaes that it is resPonsible for payin� the `'I,easehold
l;xcise Ta�c," as set forth by chapter 82.29A RC W, as now or hereinafter amended, which
is applicable to this Agreement. The LESSEE shall be not only be solely responsible for
paying such tax, but shall also be responsible for representing itself in any challenge to
the amount of such tax that the Washington State Department �f Re��enue determin�s i�
dti�� or ail�� p�nalt�� associated ���ith the tax.
'I'lie L�SS�,� a�;r�es to pr�mptly pay� �vhen due all taxes, rates, char�es and assessments.
special or otherwise and public charges of every kind and nature which may bc lawfiill}�
imposed �r �issessed in an}� wati� on the LESSEI� �vith reference to the Premises.
The L�SSE� s}lall also comply �vith and abide b}� all federal, state, couilt��, il�unicipal
and other govemmental statutes, ordinances, laws and regulations affecting the premises,
the improvements thereon, or any acti��iri� conducted on or in such Premises.
SEC�i'ION NO. 13 : NnN-LIABILITI' OF C'I�I'ti'
The CIT�C' shall not be liable in any manner for any loss, injury or damage incurred by the
I,ESSEE from acts of theft, burglary, or vandalism, committed by either identified or
unidentified parties. The LESSEE shall be responsible for providing, and all expenditure�
relating thereto, any security precaution that the LESSEE deems necessary to protect the
premises and all impr�vements thereon. The LESSEE shall be solely responsible for
providing, and all expenditures relating to, any safety and security precautions that the
LESSEE deems necessary for the safety of the personnel, guests, employees, patrons, or
users of the prenuses, or property of the LESSEE located on the premises. The LESSEE
shall implement securiri� measures sufficieni to secure the Premises after hours and
prevent unauthorized use.
SECTION NO. 14 INSPECTION
Pagc t� �f 9
�h� L.����;E s�i�ll n��e ����ilabl� ta� th�e �'IT�' c�r its du�y �uthc�rized r�pr�s��ta�i���: �t
��� tirn�e frorn Mc����i��= thr�au�l� �ri�a�r, d�r�ng narrn�l ����n��� ht��r�, �11 recc�r�ci�, b�c��:�
c�r perEir��n� in�+�rin�t�vn �f��icb the ��S'��E �h�ll ��v�e ��p� in �c�r��ur�ct�vn with �}�i�
A�,r��rr��nt �?nd �hi�t� t1�e C"I�"Y rr�a�r he requir�d Y�yr �a� �c� �nclud� c�� r��e part �C
��.�itin,� �r�c��iur�s c�r ��c�it trail�.
���TI(�l�t N(]. �.� �v'�P�1�1E �"1'Ilji.�LA�'I[71'�T
`l�s A�.r��rr�ent h�.,� 1���� �d �hall be ��nstru�c3 �� ����i�g beer� r��c�e �nd d�Ii�Fer�ed
��git��in tll� ��te o�' ���hi��tc�� and �� i� rt��xtiaally und�rs#c��d and a�r��d t�}�� �.�a.c� p�rf
th�er�t� t�a� �i� ,��re�r��n� �h�lI k�e ����e�ned i�y ��+� i��►�� of ��e State �f �J�'a.�l�ingtr�n�
ht�t� �s t� int+�r�ret.�tic�n and �e�fvr�n�c�. �un� �,��ic�n ar law, ��uit �n equifi�F. ,�udi�i�i
prv�eedin� f�r the c�t�r+c��e:�t t�f this Ag�re��.ent nr �n�F pr��i��vn �3e�ec�f shail be
i�.s�i�ut�+� and �n�i�t�in�d c�nl�t �n ��• +�f �he �c�u�� �f c�r,���t�nt �a�.r��di�tian xn �pok�ne
�'�our�t�r. �►�Vash�n��no
�E�'��'1[lN �[]�. ��G A�51�1'+������"
E��c� ��I;y t� t��� ��,re������t L t�x�����;elv��, th��� p���rs, suec.���c��� ���cu�c�rs..
�dr�unis�r�tnrs, an+3 a��ig�rs t� th� c�t��r party �of thi� zhgr��m�r�t a�d t� the p�t�F's
�uc��s�sc�rs, �xecui�r,s, at�nir�ist�ats�rs au� assig�s �f ���h �o��r p�� �th r���ect t� �a��
t�rrrr�, cvn�iiti�ns �nc� ec��er�ant� �et �c�r�h ����in. ��� �.E���� tn�y nc�t s�b��t t�e
Pr�mi��s: �1lc�w� i�5 �rs� �i�r �ny +�th�r p��r�+ar� �� �r��it�t, n�r` �s���,n, ir�sf�� in ��h��e �ar pa�
its int�re�t in this t����err��n� ��t�aut th� sa.r�� '�ein� �rs� ,�ut�ic��i���I in writiug �� th�
�IT�'". In �h� +���e�t af` � �s�i�e�t, tl�e �ssi��� shall ��t�ne aIl Ii�biitty� �f �e
���i�,n�r. An� 1lI721�1��7i7r1Z�� '�'O�ll�l�c'lt'�' c�� i��ac��untar�,� a��i�nr�tent c�� �u�-I���� �h�1� ��
vc�id, ar�d sh�11 �ermina#� ih.is L��s� �t tl�� �Ifi'4''''s r���icrn, I�r�vid�e�� th�t i� i� �nde�°�t�a�d
ih�� the �ant�r�u�n�� l�y t1�.e I�E���E ��' t��e �suppo�t an�l sp�nso���up �f ��ta��t�� p�r�u�n�
tn �.tt���m�nt "�i►" b�� �.h� �rari�u�s cl�bs th�� nz�ak� up �.he A�s�v���tic�n, �c�ie�ulin� t���
f�r ����in times �t� dat�s ��i� th�m �t�ntributi�,� t�o t�i� ��p���s c�f maint�n�r�c� a�d
c����ep, ��at, li��is, �t�., c�� the Fremi�e�. d�ae� n�� arn�ur�t t� c�r cc�n�i�t +�f sub���li�g ��
�r+�vid�d �r� t�is �ect�ic�r�.
��+CTI�N �V�.17: '�''�iV��
�'� c�ffc�r, ��rn,�lo�y+��, a,���� v�r �th+���i�+e of t}�� �I`��` �as tl�� p���er, ri���t or autl��rit�f tc�
ww�iv� an� �f t�a� cflnditions �r p�o�►i�zc�n.� c�f this ��r�er��ez�t. �� �vai�:er o#' �n� E�re�rch ��'
t�i� ��r��r��nt �h��l nc�� �e h�ld to be �a wa�ve� �f any c�t�er c�r su�ser�u��n� bsr��aa+�h. �►11
��m�cli�� ��#"�rd��i in this A►�reem�r�t c�r at la��T shall '�e t,a�.+��. �n+� c�nstru�ed a�
c�.tm�ul�ti�.r� tha� r�, in �c�di�i�n to �ve�� ��er reme€��r p�rovide� h�r�in �� �y #he la�v. T��
�°���r� �f t�� �CIT�' ta �nf�r�� zt �n�r �ime, �.r►y of tt�e �r��vi�ia��� �af this Agre�m�nt ar �v
r�q�ir�. �t a�� tin��� p�rf�rrn�.n�e i�y th� L���'�E �f �ny� ��th� prc��ris�o�s �e���f� �hall �e
�n �a �ay +cr�ns�ru�d t� b+� � v�v�.iver �+f su�h p�r�ov�s��n�, nc�r any �r�y aff��t th� �r�lidi��� t�f'
t�is aA�re�m��t +�r ��� p�k her�e+�f �r th� ri�ht af t��e CI'� �� th�r���k�er enf�r�� ���:�i �.�
Eo ��'.�+ SLl��'1 �r�G'1fi1�I1.
i�ag� 7 �f�+
�
�S��GT��� t"�(]. 1�; �Vi(��I�ICA�CI()�d
'I'���.r� s��l� b� no rnoclifica���n c�f tl�i� A�r�err�ent, �ex�e�� in �i�ir��, ����ut�d ���i�t� the
��ne f�rm�lities �F �his �re�e��t ��strwnet�t.
�5��F1 I�l'ri �(3. 1� 5����iA�ILIT lr'
It i� �an��r�t�o�i �nd ��r��c� by� th� �a�r�i�s t���t �iT ���� ���rt, t�rrx� �r pr���i�i�ar7 c�f` this
�.grr��me�t �� h�lc� by tl�� +�c�u�t tc� b� ill���l, the ��ali�iiiy ��' the r��n�ini�g pv�ti�ar� �r
�rc���is�c�ns �h�ll �o�t b�e ��'�c��d. �nd �e r'r�t� �nd abli�at�ans �� t�e ��i+�s s�all ��
c��ns�ru�d �d e�#'c�rc�c� �� i�' tl�i� :��►�,r �ii�� n�t c•c,t�tai� � ��a �a4�t. ������ �r
�rc��-x�ic�n 1�eid tc� l�� ���#a�i�.
If i� ����ul� a���:�u- t�lat ����k �ar�, t�ri�� c�� ,�ru��i�ic�r� ���r��� is i� �c�ntlic�t ������ �u��r st�tutc�r}°
����i�i�ns t�t V��hin�tan, then #.�e �a�rt, ier�, c�c p�r+�vi�ic�n her��of �+r�i�� m��� ct�nflict
tl�ere��ilh shail be c�e�n�e� inc�pc�r�tive, i�ull �d �•c��d ����f�r a� it n���� �e in c+�nt�ict
there���ith� �z��c� sl��lf h� +�e�xr4�d t€� rr��+�i��v t� c�nfc�r�a t� s�ic� s���utar�° �rovisic�r��.
��Gr�'I(�� �i�Q. 2{l: �C)�'-i]I��:�IM1�A'T���
°1Al L.��'��� spe�if c����F ��re�s ti��t �t s�a�l ��m�rl�r wit� �all �p�lic��b�� �+�d�ral �n� st�it�
law� relati�� t� �aa�-�.i�c�ri�rYin�ti�n f�r �n�� pr���ran� �ar act���ity- eon�luct�d t�o� t] �����F
�.�n t���.� �'r�rt�isc�
���Ti�l'ri iV�(l. 21� H�A�1�1G�
�A11� s�ctiar� ���a�i���,� G����ae�.rin�; in �his �1�r�+�m�nt ha��e ����� in�e�.�c� �c�l�l�� ��3r c�i�y
��rpc��e �f c���►�ai�n� �d r�aciy-r���rence. �n �� �va� dv th�yr �uur��rt tc�� an� s�'�a�l n�t b�
���med t�� ��ti�e, �invt c�r �xtend tl�� sc��e ar intent s�f th� s�ct3c�r�� t� ��hi�:�t t}�c;�+ �r�:
.
p�x�[�itun�.
��CTI(��I N+i�, ��. ��11�� (7�F T��� �����1�'E
�i�e t� +��` the ��ser�c� �i� �acY� and � v� r�� pr�ti� i�i�n I����i�.
SF�TI�i� ��. 23 . e��..'V'��'R�TIP�GS �`C)I�'I't�il�IEi� ;���x�+I
I`his ,�,,�;re��me�k �c�ntain� �11 th� term� �� �c�a�r.�itic�r�s ��,r��:�i u�c�� ��l t��L Fares��. �i"��
�th�r u��e;rstan�i�gs, c�ra1 �r cat���r�wis�, r�gardin� tI�� subj�ct n��tt�r n� t�.i� �1���r��r�t
sh�ll h� de�m�d t� �x�st r�r tc� bind an�F c�f th� T'arti�s.
`I'��c I��S��� ���s re��! anr� unc�erst,�n.�� �1�� ���hc���e �f tl�� �k�c�v� 11�re�en��nt and nc���F �t�t�s
tha.t n� r�prese�tt�tic�n, p�amis+e a�r a�gr�e�ent �,�t �e�gr����d ir� t.�i� ��;rc���Y�.�ilt h�� ��c��.
r����e tc� i�c����e the LE���� ta� �nt�� �i.
��iSa�C $ l�� `.)
i
SEC;'I'ION NU. 2�1 EXIiIBITS —
.�1. In�ur.ir��c c�i
IN ��'ITI�iCSS V1'HE�Z�;U�', thc 1':1I� I II�ti h�t��� ���u���i tlli� ,=� �I'Ct'II1�111 tu h�
etic.�cuttc� on the date .ind ti�ear �et f�r �h���z.
�'I I ti' c�T� �1�� �h.�til ��.1I_I I�:��: �t E=� 1 I�l:ti I�:�'vc'f�: :���c ��'!:� I Ic)\:
llave Mercier, City Manag�r Name
Title:
TaY IT) N�. __
A�l"1�L;51�: A�'�'KUV��ll A5 �I�U �-UK `� � .
Chris�ine �3ainbridge, Git�� Clerk Oftice �f the C'ity Att�rnc:�•
f';i'.;i `+ ul `�
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Councii Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Itenn: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information � admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Allocation of Space at Spokane Valley Precinct Building
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approved Precinct Building purchase on June 6,
2006: Approved revised Precinct Building lease agreement on August 28, 2007.
BACKGROUND: The City purchased the Precinct Building from Spokane County in 2006. In
2007, the City paid off the remaining balance on the building. The new lease and maintenance
agreements approved by both parties preserved the original occupancy rates of 56% for the City
and 44°� for the County.
In 2008, the County notified the City that it would cease to pay for the holding area, the rear
garage, and several other shared areas beginning in 2009.
The City is exploring other options for the use of these areas.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The decision of the County to discontinue payment on the jail
holding area and decrease its occupancy rate from 44% to 15°/a will cause a decrease in
revenue of approximately $102,000 for the fiscal year 2009.
STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst
ATTAC H MENTS
1
�..11���.t��� �� ���.�� �.�
�i ��' ���l�a�� �a.����
�
�'���ir��t ��i1�.i��
�9���an K.a��iellca, ��ni��r �A�r�inistrat��v� �nalyst
1�+1��r 1 �, ����
��.��[�1�' C)� ��C���I1� ��.����J'
�I ���1��� �1.�1�.�1�'1�
� �+DO1 - �'urc�a.ss�d �� ��+�kar�� �v. fc�r $1,2��1,{��Q,
o ���� -Remodel�ed f�r $1,�U4,� l7,
o �O�D� y �it}r a►f �pokar�� �`��ley (�U�V} be�,an le�sing �+�% �f
�uildiri�;,
�� �{�D� - Cit�� �urc��e�d huildin�. �c�unty b��,� l�sin� 44��`�,
c��' �ui�ciin�.
��(}�7 -�CityF pa�d a��'�" r�ma%nir�� amou�t +����c� t� �C�unty.
[� 2+D�� —��u.���� n�t�fi�d �i� �hat it u�a►�]d n� ��ng�ea� p�y �c�r
th� hc�ld�n� �r�e� �nd �t��� area� �rev�.nusly de�i�,n�.t�ed
C��unty a��ea�.
��C�(�9 � Cc��.nty� r��d�uc�d �o��c�p��� �rv� 44% t� 15�/Q.
�
�'ina.����1 I�pa��
o Le�s� �20+�� c�? $1�.�9 p�r square �vc��
� 4�°�0 � �1�1�, ��4
■ 1 �°,�� � ���,2�(�
� I�i�f�r�ence = L�ss c�f ��?,2+�4
� I"v���n��er��c� �4��� �,`�'a $121,�}��
■ 4���'� -� ��3.���?
■ � 5 ��'o � $1$,15 {�
■ �iffere�ce = �c�ss vf ���,C��{�
❑ �I'+at�� ��v��u� �.�ss f'c�r �'C��� = $10�,�'��
r _ . . . ' . _ __ _ ' . ._ - � �
�I�l�.i�� ���� � ��i�}� �o�t �u� T���
o �c�c��i�n�� �� te��ir�;� of �E.T�
�rre�tee�.
�a �rc���,ti�r� us�s ���11 ��`f ��e �n�e d�y pe;� ����
�c� rr���1: �it�i ��a���� Vr�il�� ��c�b�.������rs.
�
- - -- - - - - - - �
Future Use of Holding Area - Options
❑ Leased Office Space
o Records/Property Storage
o Court Related Services
o Future Law Enforcement Needs
Next Steps
o Identify best options for use of holding area.
o Acquire estimate of conversion for desired
use options.
o Select use and begin conversion
■ Identify conversion cost
■ Calculate expected revenue or cost savings
■ Begin use of vacant areas
3
�r� c�� ��c���� �r�►����r
R�+q��st fvr C+�ur��ci� l��ti+an
Meeti��g �]a#e: �+i�y 1�, �Ot�� +�i�y M�n��er S�ign-t�ff:
rt�e�n. �h+�ck a�l t�af app�ly: ,[� ��ns��t ❑ o��d �usir�ess ���u�r b�s�n��s� a pu�lic f���rin�
� infc�rmatrcan � adrinin. rep�r� ❑ p��n�ding le�i�l�tion
A�E�1qA IT�M "��T�.E. R��i�onal �'r�nspartati�on
��l/�RN�C�� L�4��SLAT�t��y
PF��111t�US C�UNC�L A�TIC]�i TA41�E1�:
�A+� �+G RUlJ � �:
I'��yv�' Mu�svr� v�rifl �iv� �n u�dat� on th�� i�,�u� �� r�:t�i�n�� t��s�nspvrt�t�on.
�PT��I��;
RE+�C�IVIMENI]E[� AGTI+�N +OR MQ�T1D1�:
E�L,1D+C��TII�INAr+ICIAL I�PA�T�`;
�TAF�I��N��L C�NTA+�fi: �'la�rar I'�ur�sc�n
ATTACF�M�[���:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 12, 2�09 City Manager Slgn-off:
Item Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business � public hearing
� information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legisiation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: ���linter Snow Remeval and De-icir.c� S aR�iCFS
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On March 24, 2009 Council approveci b,y c�nsens�,s
to move ahead with a two-step RFP for a private contract for winter services.
BACKGROUND: The City received clarification from Bob Brueggeman, County Eng -�_�� -� -:��
May 4, 2009 stating that it was not the County's intention to develop the RFP for winter servi� �� -.
for the City. Based on that understanding we are developing the 1 S� Step, Letter of Interest
(LOI), which may help us in determining if there are interested private contractors who want to
provide Winter Snow Removal and De-icing Services. The LOI is scheduled to be advertised ���
late May. We will also proceed with the selection of a consultant to assist us in developing the
2" Step, a formal RFP, for the procurement for a winter service operation. The RFP will take �-
6 months to develop and several additional months to advertise, select and approve :-:
contract. The contrac#or would then have to purchase the required equipment and gE �
everything operational. The possibility of having a private contractor on board and ready ��:_,
provide service by November is unlikely. As a result, we will contart the County Engin�Er to
pursue negotiations for winter services.
There may be a possibility as an emergency measure for this winter where we could obtain
surplus plow/sanders form WSDOT, buy or lease an existing faci�ty that would have adequate
shop and storage space for a winter operation and use a private contractor to provide operators
and mechanics. If we were able to secure the facilities and equipment it would require a
significant effort to purchase all the materials, supplies, and tools needed for the operation and
to train and organize the operators for a full winter operation. We currently do not have a clear
understanding of the procurement process required for this effort. We are discussing the details
of this process with our Legal Department. The time requirement for procurement may make
this option unachievable. We would need direction to move ahead on this plan immediately.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT� Neil Kerst�n
ATTACHMENTS Request for Letter of Interest
(�1�1' 1' t)F
o n�
ae
CITY OF SPOKANF, VALLF.�r'
Pubtic Worlis Dep artment
Letter of Interest (LOI)
Public Works Winter Snowplowiog and ne-icing Services
May 1 �, 2009
Publication dafes, 2009 and, 2009.
SU B MITTAL DEADLIN E
�:0O f':�1 ('lo�al timc), F�rida��. , �01)�)
SUBMIT
Original plus four (=�) duE�lirat� cc�pie5
UEL1VE�t TU:
City of Spokane Valley
Public Works Department
11707 E. Spra�ue Avenue, Suite lU6
�p��kan� Vallcv, �� �'�
-f-
TABLE OF CONTEN"I�S
SECTION DESCRIPTI4N PAG _F,
REQUEST QUALIFICATIONS .................................................................................................................................1
INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1
PROJECTDFSCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................................. I
PROJECTSCHEDULE ................................................................................................ .................... l
SCOPEOF SERVICES .....................................................................................................................................................1
CONFIDENTIALITY �
....................................................................................................................................................... :.
F4RMATAND BINDING ................................................................................................................................................?
DELIVERY ....................................................................................................................................................................._.._
�
�.
-II-
REQUEST' FUR LETTER OF IyTEREST
1NTRODUCTION: The City of Spokane Valley is s�liciting Letter5 ut Interest (LUI) ir�m c{ualified coniractors t��►
pro��ide snow plowing and de-icing services for Cin� streets. The Lf1T i� n�t to he c�nstn�ed as �3 rc �n th� C'iri�'ti
part to issue a subsequc�t Request f �r Prc� pos;�l f RFI' ).
PRO.TECT DESCRIP'TICI,ti: (f�� c_ it} i; �l�i�r�•ntl� un���r ��_�ntra�t «iifl Spokan: c_'��u�tt`� t,� pr�_�� i�l� �n�>�ti r�F1��. :�n�]
deicing services. Spokane Counry has terminated that contract effectivdJctober 15, 2009. The City is seeking a contract����
to provide cornplete snow and deicing services for all City streets. This service would require a 24 hour a day, 7 d�� �,,
�veek operation on an as�—needed basis to maintain Citv streets at the required level of,er� i� �.
PRO.TECT SCHEDULF:
By October 16, 2009, the City� i»ust ha�c a sriu��� pl���in�a�c� cie-iciilg pruara►n. I�hi ir:i?i.�i ��1� �,.. ���.:�� �,� in;;�',_���: n<<_��.i �;�
��*� �rt1�•rr•t�1��,' c�r' 1l't }�;l�I� �,�,it�i ;1 ��' f:Clii ����:ir�•t{i� �� 1?� ���C fi,iitir�� ��•����,
O1 �l 1.1\}�, ti(�OI'i�: Of�' �E�:lt� ICE:�:
Term of contract: It is anticipatcd that this contract would be a�� �!, � r�,i r� •��� ���I�-• _��.-' �
acceptable performanceby the contractor.
Bonding requirements: The contractor �i�ill b� required to maintain a ful l p�: � � � : � :: .. .� � . _ , . . � � � � � �� . i � ; � �
amount of the annual contract.
Insurance requirements: The contractor will be required to maintain, at a mini;r�:.�;� ,. �����r���_r�� �,.1 �-���,._�:,i i,,i>iiir�
co��era2eof $1 milli�n per occurance. $2 million a��re�afe: �2 milli�n �rehicle liabil;� ; . ' .. ' ,
��U:/1:111it'�' tll Uil(l1lC( f U�ItI'(1 1l'l \ lll': E iil ���iii(.t�� Itl�l� i���ll ;. . .. l.i ', ... _
guarantee to ensure that essential sen�ice will not be interrupted.
Equipment requirements: Nine tandem-axle trucks �vith sanJ��r �,��it, aj��l ��i����..;i���, c.����1���►-��.�i� t,����1,� �� iti,
2000 gallon (iquid de-icing units; six graders with wings; two front end loaders; other miscellmieous equipme���
necessary for a compl�te ��•inter sno�v plowing/deicing operation. Additionally, during extreme snow events, tli��
con� may be required to bring on up to six additional graders to provide service in residential area�.
Equipment , �;i� i,.• ��.,.,,� r;, ,h.�. ;�, :� i,�. ,;,:� `S .I ,;�,�,�-„ �f n ; ,t'�I�- : �,,: ; ,�,�-,-.,;;, n f,f� ;�.,� �,;t,,:_.
operations.
Communieations and A�"L tracking: The contractor will be required t� prv� : . . � � .
enabie the City to communicate with the contractor and monitor contractor activities. Additionally. all equiprnen
will have real time Automatic Vehicle Location (AVI:) trackin� svstemst� allowthe ('�� . � �
activities of contractor eqi, �,� ��.
Requirements for equipu►.�ut lll.ilil�l'ii:lilCt'. 1'l'ill'li.i� .itlt� I'E'1)I:il'l'I1il'111: I �i� ��;llif.i�i�%i �� l�l C�� i:�iiiil:�l i�
follow a maintenance and replacement schedule similarto the Statc nf �Vashin�t�n I�epartment �f Tr�n�p�rtati�n' :
maintenance and replacement program for comparable equipme� :
Staffing requirements: The contractorwill be required to ha�c ���ityu�t� �t:�tlin� t� l��n,�!. �;���r:�:��.:, t� r..;�:
above equipment on a 24 hour a day basis, 7 days a week as needed t�� maintain rit` �tre rt:.
Pto���inQ!deicin� route�: �ee the attach�d �n���- P1��«� Pri��ritt� '�1���,
���'( ) �'ll�)_I}f) — (�llf��i� `�1 ��r��•.� `l!'L�1 �\1;i!I}l�''.l,�lii�' ��f1.!��ti l��:i{� ��,�"`. � , —�r -,
Pei•f�rmance requiremcnt;.
Reyuirements for t�pE�s, yuantitiesanel stor���e uf c�c�irinh m��terials
Facility i•equirements: I�he contractor «�ill be required to ha�•e ad�quate facilities for storage ��f �C�UIpi1lE;ilt
materials� and for servicing and maintaining equipment. The facility �ti�ill be required to be located within the City
of Spokane Valley.
CONFInF.NTIALIT�r': Contra�t�rs respunding to thi� L�tt�r� ol� Intcrest (LO1) are hereby put on notice that Spokane
Valley ���ill re�ard submitta�s as public records which will be available for public inspection and/or copying, subject to the
public disclosure requirements of RCW Chapter 42.56. If these terms are not acceptable, r� contractor should not respond to
this LOI.
FURMAT: The LOI should contain the company's history and experience. It should brietly describe your ability to
provide this service including w�hether you have existing equipment and facilities or if you would intend to purchase ne��•
equipment and/ar facilities and any otl�er information that would assist the City in detennining if there are private
contractors that are interested in provi�ing this service for the City.
DELIVERY: LOI's must be received on tiie day,date, time and location stipulated on the cover sl�ect.
�
RF(� #09-00 — Public «'orks Street �laintena�ice Servic�s Plan �'age 2 of 2