CUE-22-95
♦
r ~
, •Y
Ell
~ p.~? :
Df-TARTNIENT OF BUILnING AND PLANNiNG • A l71VI51(~ti OFTf-IF I'U[3LIC WOP.ICS DEPARTMENT
JAMi " L. Nl:,NS,0':. U.B.C)., [)ENvis N1. ~~~Y-li-. P.[:., I)II:R-I-0I;
LTURN RECEIPT IZy_..~
harlotte 5tevenson 5usan Tiffany
13618 East 4th Avenue 4207 North Murray Road
Spokane, WA 99216 Otis Orchards, WA 99027
St1B.TECT: CUE-22-95
Stevenson/'Tif-tallv DaI1Ct' Studio
'I'he purpose of this letter is to report to you regarding the progress thus far with bringing the
property at 13618 East 4t11 Avenue into coi»pliance with the abvve conditional use permit.
NO E;N,'IDENCL OF CONIPLIANCE
1. "I'here is no evidence that the required permanent sign, condition of approval II.4.a, has been
illstalled. I have Evidence, in photographic form, of a very temporary and inadequate (in the
sense of a permanent sign) sign.
2. As of July 30, 1996 there has been no tinal inspection to veriiy that the change of use permit
iias been properly executed (condition of approval II.9). As pointed out in point number five
of my May 13, 1996 letter to you, this was to be accomplished on or before June 1, 1996.
To the extent the above two items are accurate representations of the current situation, your client
continues to remain in noncompliance, and in jeopardy of not achieving permanent status for the
conditional use permit. Consistent with the previous ma.nner in which this failure to comply with
the conditions of approval was handled, I invite you to submit reasons why the temporary
conditional use permit should not be voided.
EVIDENCE OF CO`1PLIANCr,
1. I now have an acceptable site plan prepared by Metro Engineering, dated July 20, 1996 and
received on July 22, 1996 in the Division of Building and Planning (Planning Section). The
Division of Engineering and Roads initially asked for a$500 bond in order to cover the cost
of improvements to be installed in the road right-of-way. I backed away from ,.tR5 ,
the existing temporary nature of the conditional use permit and the fact that ~t wil~'nop
.IUC 1996
1026 WEST Br:oADtti'AY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASf1INCTOU 9926U
Tivr[.Dttic PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
~4~itir~I COU~1lY ENGINEE~?
~~.r 50~) ~~~-2205 • F;~x ~o~~ .~~t~_~?~~:~ S ~
INc; Pt t; ti )
Pt :~N':
Tl)D: (309) 32•1-~,16n
,
Charlotte Stcvenson
Susan Tiffany
.1uly 31, 1996
T'<t c '
L)Ck~Ulllk: ajiCtlll~i11Ci1[ I)Cl-titll L1t1k.;55 lll~,: 1ll1j)1'v~Cll1C1]lS Zll'C 1115ldllCo. I1v~1c:V~i, 1 t11U agt'ee
with the Engineering & Roads Division that, if the improvements in the county right-of-way
cre not installed by October l, 1996 (after which weather usually makes paving impractical,
ilot impossible), I would then require a bond or other financial warranty or else would void
._le permit as fatling to complv.
2. 1 al'so I1.1vc a l'lnclscape plan prepared hy I-Iarold leutschc] l.anci~capii1g. 1 have modilied the
plan slightly to reflect the removal of the existing driveway and sidewalk, where the new
driveway crosses the existing walkway to the front door. This landscaping must also be
iristalled as part of the accomplishment of December 1, 1996. If all the landscaping stock is
not avaiiable for installation in 1996, it will be necessary for Tiffany/Stevenson to assure the
saIlle w1111 :1 hiIIId (ll' otl1c'I' f lllancial guarantee.
In light of the above, I recognize progress in some areas and underline the deficiencies in other
areas. In addition to working on the deadlines of October 1 and December l, 1996, you need to
take immediate steps to post the required permanent sign and to call for the.final inspection for
the purposes of converting the building to its use as a dance studio. At the present time, you
r in r r, isk of not~ing able to convert the tempor-ary conditional use permit into a permaclent
o tional use permit.,
^1 r P, 1 ~ I
i '
. j,
~
~ ,
THOMAS G O'SHET~, AICP
Senior Plaqher
c: Allan deLaub els, Zoning Code Enforcement (Enclosures )
V,Kott Engelhard, Land Deveiopment Coordinator, Division of Engineering & Roads
Tom Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator, Division of Building
Brian Ragen, Attorney at Law, Suite 680, 316 West Boone Avenue, Spokane, W'A 99201
Joel G. Lee, P.E., Metro Engineering, Inc., 9616 East Montgomery, Spokane, WA 99206
Opponents of record:
Farrel W. Summers
Pat Paullin
John V. Paullin
Roger E. Grenz
Enciosures
R'i i-('[ T-22-9 5 iz:1O►,ti' I_TR 7l ~ 1/96
{
ZONING ADJUS'i'OR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF A CONDITIONAL ) FINDINGS OF FA('T.
USE PERMIT FOR A HOME INDUSTRY ) CONCLUSIONS.
[dance studio in detached building] ) AND DECISION
APPLICANT:
FILE: CUE-22-9
COMPANION FILL: CV-10;-9'-
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: "I"tic applic ant pi-u~~~C"' tu a~l;~il,~~
existing detached structure on a lot. The lot also contains the applicant's residence. Authority tu
consider such a request exists pursuant to section 14.404.100 of the Zoning Code of Spokane
County and Spokane Countv Roard of Countv Commissioners resolution No. 89 0708, as mav he
amended.
PROJECT LUCArI'ION: Generally located in Spokane Valley, suutll ui aiiLi aLljacCilt to 4L11
Avenue, approximately 600 feet west of Evergreen Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 22, Township
25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington; 13618 East 4th Avenue.
Parcel No.: 45221.0101
OPPONENTS OF RECORD:
Farrel W. Summer John V. Paullin
Pat Paullin Roger E. Grenz
PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION: After consideration of all available information on
file, one or more site visits, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the
public hearing held on October 25, 1995, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on
December 28, 1995 to APPROVE an approximately three (3)-month temporary conditional use
pernut, pending review and approval of a detailed, professionally prepared parking and loop
driveway plan. At the end of three months, the temporary conditional use permit will be either
voided and no permit will exist or a renewal conditional use permit will be recognized by letter,
with a condition that certain improvements be installed within the next six months, possibly leading
to a renewal and optional semipermanent status.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Testimony was taken under oath.
2. The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained in the file; more
particularly:
a. The applicant, Charlotte Stevenson, owns the property and occupies the residence
located on the site. Ms. Stevenson is minimally engaged in the business; but, her activities
include making some appointments and answering some telephone calls regarding the dance
studio.
b. John Tiffany, grandson of Ms. Stevenson and son of the proprietress of the `studio business (who lives off site), lives at the subject property and does the bookkc,,
preparation of some promotional literature, and promotional aspects of the business.
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 2
c. Prior to the construction of the detached accessory building now containing the
dance studio business, the dance studio was operated within the dwelling unit.
d. The parcel of property is unique in that it includes the (west) one-half right-of-right
for Mamer Road, which was vacated some years ago. In June, July and August, 1995, the
applicant caused a 30-foot by 48-foot steel-sided building to be erected on the easterly portion
of the parcel (the former Mamer Road right-of-way), approximately 10 feet from the east
property line and 10 feet from the rear property line. The building is approximately 15 feet
tall. The building was clearly designed for studio purposes, insofar as it does not have a
garage door in it, which would be typical for this size of building.
e. The dance studio operation was carried on as an unauthorized use until a complaint
was filed and an invesdgation brought to light that the activity was illegal unless a conditional
use permit for home industry was obtained. The applicant applied for a conditional use
permit, as directed by zoning enforcement.
f. The existing house, breezeway and garage do not interfere with the potential for
parking cars north of the detached building and east of the existing attached garage.
However, a concrete slab next to the attached garage interferes with a smooth flow of parking
space, ingress, egress and turning around. The property layout also allows up to two
parking spaces for employees, or overflow client parking, to be located immediately west of
the accessory building and slightly behind and southeast of the existing garage. Additional
one or two parking spaces exist on the existing driveway.
g. The environmental checklist provided by the applicant, as well as testimony
provided by John Tiffany in the hearing, indicates the dance studio operation is being/will be
confined to Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays. The operation was identified in the public
hearing as operating from 3:00 to 9:00 p.m. on Mondays and Tuesdays and approximately I
5:45 to 8:00 p.m. on Wednesdays.
h. The building, which was constructed as a storage building, may not meet the
criteria for an assembly or occupancy building. Prior to continued lawful use of this building
for public assembly (the dance studio operation), the building may need to be upgraded to a
class of building other than the class to which it was originally approved and constructed.
i. The applicant proposed no signs to indicate the presence of a dance studio at tlle
property. Having proposed none does not necessary mean that it would not be better if there
were a small sign. Therefore, a modest sign will be allowed with a maximum size specified
below.
3. The adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the proposal
as Urban. The proposal is generally consistent with the Urban category of the Comprehensive
Plan. The detailed definition of the Urban category clearly describes a mixture of neighborhood
business combined with single-family residential uses. Objective l.l.i and Decision Guideline
1.1.7 clearly embrace the concept of home occupations, as long as existing residential amenities,
potential traffic congestion and mitigation of potentially negative impacts are addressed. Fourtll
Avenue, upon which the property fronts, is a collector arte►•ial. As an east-west collector arterial,
linking north-south McDonald and Evergreen Roads, and therefore providing indirect access to
Sprague Avenue and any future south Valley arterial, this property will be experiencing
,
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTUR PAGE 3
increasingly larger amounts of traffic on 4th Avenue. A low-impact business is not inappropriate
on such an arterial.
4. The site is zoned Urban Residential-3.5, which allows the proposed use upon approval
of this application. Other uses permitted outright in the zone are: a community hall, club or lodge;
community recreation facility; community swimming pool; commuaity transit center; daycare
center; family daycare home; golf course; hospital; library; mini-daycare center; nursery school;
park-and-ride faciliry; public park (including caretaker's residence); post office; public utility local
distribution facility; public utility transportation faciliry; and kindergarten, elementary, middle and
junior high school. The proposal will have comparatively less or equal impact than some uses
allowed outright in the zone.
5. Typically, uses listed as a conditional use are assumed as permitted in the underlying
zone, subject to the listed standards and any other conditions needed to assure compatibility in the
given instance. But, pursuant to 14. 404.101, the requested conditional use permit may be denied
if the Hearing Body cannot find that the requested use will be compatible with other permitted
uses. Section 14.616.240.4 lists certain standards to achieve compatibility, some of which the
Hearing Body may exercise nominal discretion over in order to achieve the overall intent of
compatibility with surrounding properties. Clearly, 14.404.102 allows the Hearing Body to
impose any and all manner of additional conditions and requirements in an effort to achieve
maximum compatibiliry.
In the instant situation, several circumstances need to be noted. The property to the east
has mature and dense trees located on its western property line, thus effectively screening, on the
adjacent property owner's land, the activity of the dance center and its traffic circulation and
parking. In the public hearing, there were no complaints of visual or audible impacts from adjacent
property owners. There were complaints of cars parking in the street; of cars making U-turns; of
children jay-walking across the street in the middle of the block (on a collector arterial); and of cars
backing into the street, thus threatening oncoming vehicular traffic as well as pedestrian traffic.
There was also some complaint regarding large numbers of cars associated with events or activities
which involved larger-than-average or normal numbers of student clients (likely recitals or class
picture taking). In order to maintain neighborhood appearance and character (Zoning Code
14.616.240.4.a), several conditions of approval may be necessary to mitigate actual problems at
the site associated with conducting the dance studio.
6. The following is true with regard to the proposal.
a. The Zoning Code, in Section 14.802.040.16, specifies one parking space per 100
gross square feet of building. This would result in 15 parking stalls required at the property.
However, testimony in the hearing was that much of the client business is "drop-off'
business after the younger students mature beyond the fairly young age.
b. Based on the above, and other testimony during the hearing, the Zoning Adjustor
believes that eight on-site parking stalls for clients and two parking stalls for employees (in
addition to that required for the residence) would more than likely accommodate the business.
If this became a condition of approval and it were nonetheless deternuned, through
evaluations and zoning complaints to not be sufficient, the number of parking stalls could be
administratively inereased or the size of the classes could be limited.
c. There also is apparently a problem with clients not wishing to park their cars in
the on-site parking lot and insisting on parking on the street. Although the applicant does not
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 4
have absolute control over people who would choose to park on the street and not in a
provided on-site parking lot, the applicant needs to be aware that continued and flagrant
abuse of on-street parking when there is off-street parking available may result in a hearing
for the purpose of rescinding or revoking the conditional use permit. When safety is at issue,
the County will not be part of authorizing a business which does not make every effort
possible to provide off-street parking and minimize instances in which children are running
back and forth across a collector arterial.
d. The Zoning Adjustor notes that the connection of existing family members
residing at the property to the business is a tenuous connection at best. Testimony indicated
that the instructors and actual owner of the dance studio business do not reside on the
property. Failure of at least one of the dwellings' residents to be engaged in the business will
automatically void the permit. Proof of involvement may be requested.
e. The detached structure located on the property is a lawfully located building. The
only issue before the Zoning Adjustor is the use which is occurring within the building.
f. As required by the Zoning Adjustor, the applicant submitted a site plan showing
parking and a circular driveway within the prescribed date of November 8, after the public
hearing had otherwise closed and ceased public input. The purpose of this additional site
plan was to try to clarify and lay out a plan, to be later executed, to provide for on-site
parking and a loop driveway, both aimed at keeping automobiles from backing into 4th
Avenue and to provide a convenient drop-off location for students, as opposed to dropping
students off in the street and having them be exposed to traffic on this collector arterial.
A review of this plan by the Zoning Adjustor deternunes that providing a loop
driveway, eight client parking spaces and up to two staff spaces, in addition to the parking
for the residence, is quite likely possible. However, the applicant's plan is lacking in quality
sufficient to provide guidance for someone installing these improvements. The applicant,
aided by John Tiffany, while making a good "citizen effort" to provide a technically accurate,
competent document., really needs to solicit involvement of one or more professionals.
A civil engineer with vehicle parking layout and travelway design skills is
suggested. A major flaw of the document is a misunderstanding of where the property line is
in the front yard. The Zoning Adjustor's estimate is that the front property line is probably
only 39 feet from the face of the residence (as opposed to the 50 feet suggested in the Tiffany
drawing). A five-foot future acquisition area would place the front property line at
approximately 34 feet from the front of the residence. The circular driveway shown on the
applicant's drawing does not reflect this kind of existing and probable future property line.
The applicant's drawing also has succeeded in making a large ingress-egress area
at the existing driveway, including nearly the entire area east of the existing driveway. This
is neither good practice nor safe. The loop driveway shown by the applicant also appears to
cause the removal of the attractive and mature blue spruce located in the west part of the front
yard, an amenity which adds to the residential appearance and character of the property. Its
removal should be avoided.
Part of the reason for issuing a temporary conditional use permit is for this plan,
or some version thereof, to be prepared professionally with accurate and surveyed
dimensions for the purposes of providing adequate guidance to a contractor to lay out a
parking lot, locate a loop driveway, save the existing blue spruce and provide an
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 5
ingress-egress point for both the parking lot and the easterly end of the loop driveway (as
well as access to the personal garage) which will concentrate an egress-ingress point at one
easterly curb cut. The concrete slab also must be removed in order to provide adequate
circulation space for the automobiles to be able to back up and maneuver. Finally, the
parking stalls need to have some control device installed to keep the cars from ramming into
the existing chain link fence, which fence more than likely belongs to the property owner to
the east and needs to be protected from abuse.
7. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, the environmental checklist and other
data have been reviewed and the project has been found to not have any probable significant
adverse impacts to the physical environment. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was
issued on September 20, 1995 and sent to five agencies. The agencies reviewing the checklist
neither indicated that a more detailed environmental review should be provided nor commented that
the DNS should be reconsidered. Comments regarding the environmental matters were made at the
public hearing. There was not sufficient evidence presented pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) to
withdraw the DNS.
8. The home industry conditional use permit is unique in that it is nonspecific with regard
to a use or function. Unlike most conditional use pennits, it leaves an enormous amount of
discretion to the hearing body with respect to the "residential appearance and character"
requirement of § 14.616.240.4.a of the Zoning Code. The conditional use permit, as a result of the
residential appearance and character requirement, is essentially a performance standard concept in
which, if the standards listed in the Zoning Code are met, various conditions of approval applied as
needed to mitigate most adverse impacts and a finding is made that the resulting proposed activity
would be compatible with uses permitted outright in the location and zone, home industry must be
approved. Without a doubt all of the standards, with the possible exception of 14.616.240.4.a are
met or can be met by the proposal. Subsection "a" is not a measurable, quantitative standard and
involves a considerable judgment as to whether it is achieved by a given proposal. Numerous
conditions of approval will be specified, all designed to mitigate, to the maximum extent possible,
the off-site impacts of this proposal; all based on the premise that the project can, in the final
analysis, retain "residential appearance and character" and that the use is not so deleterious to the
area that it fails the test of "will be compatible with other permitted uses in the zone involved."
(Zoning Code: Section 14.404.101)
9. Any listed conditional use permit, such as the one under consideration, carries with it a
legislative presumption of valid.ity. That is, the use is acceptable; but, the only issue is how to
make the use as compatible as possible with uses permitted outright in the zone and with nearby
uses. (Zoning Code: § 14.404.101.1) A conditional use pernut need not necessarily be fully
compatible with uses which happen to be in the immediate vicinity (residential, in this case); but, in
this case the test of compatibility with residential uses is a primary concern so that the residences in
the area are not adversely affected by noise, light, traffic congestion and children running across
the street, down the street and across front yards. All manner of conditions of approval and other
requirements are available to any hearing body, under the authority of Section 14.404.102 of the
Zoning Code.
10. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies 4th Avenue as a 70-foot collector arterial. The
existing right-of-way width of SO feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to
implement the Arterial Road Plan, it is recommended that a strip of property 5 feet in width alona
the 4th Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane
County at the time arterial improvements are made to 4th Avenue.
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOK;ANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 6
11. Minimally, the proposal must meet, be capable of ineeting andlor being conditioned to
meet, the standards of § 14.616.240.4 of the Zoning Code, the section pertaining to a conditional
use pernut for a home industry in the UR-3.5 zone. This section contains subparagraphs "a"
through "i." The standards "b" through "i" are very objective and measurable. The applicant either
meets these standards and/or is easily capable of ineeting them. However, subsection "a" is a
subjective standard. Discretionary judgment is placed by the Zoning Code with the Hearing Body
to make this judgment. In an effort to clarify the purpose and intent of the home industry comment
and to assist in determining whether " . . . property retain(s) its residential character;" the
definitions of key words from Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, lOth Edition, are:
Residential: Of or appropriate for residences.
Residence: A place in which one lives.
Appearance: Outward aspect.
Character. A distinct feature or aspect.
12. In order to maintain this residential appearance and character, as defined by Webster's
Dictionary, the project must minimize traffic congestion; keep parked or waiting automobiles off
the road to the maximum extent possible; prohibit cars from backing onto the arterial; provide room
for cars to turn around on the property, once having driven into the parking lot; and provide a loop
driveway for parents to drop children off without letting them out on the street.
13. Although the site plan presented by the applicant (John Tiffany) is not as polished as it
needs to be to ensure an adequate solution to the parking and off-street circulation, it nonetheless is
indicative that the parking and circulation issue can be resolved on the site, mitigating most of the
existing or potential problems.
14. This conditional use pernut may be denied only where it can be shown that the
requested use cannot be compatible with other pernutted uses in the zone. An examination of the
many uses allowed in the UR-3.5 zone clearly indicates that this use is far less deleterious than
many uses allowed outright in the zone with respect to the off-site impacts it will create. It does
not achieve a standard upon which denial becomes necessary.
15. Adequate conditions and restrictions have been described above which will be required
of the project. Issuing a temporary conditional use permit for a six-month period of time in order
to allow the adequate design of parking and circulation is a needed mitigating measure. Allowing
an additional six months for improvement to be financed and constructed, weather permitting, will
then allow this to be an acceptable conditional use permit.
16. Contrary to what was stated in the hearing by the Zoning Adjustor, it will not be
practically possible to dictate that every client use the off-street parking provided on the property.
In some rare instances, of course, there will be more clients attempting to park than there will be
parking spaces. If this happens on a routine basis, the Division of Building and Planning will
administratively require additional parking to be created or limit the size of the dance classes. If
someone chooses to legally park on the street, it is not possible to legally force them to park on the
property. On the other hand, if there is a substantial, continued abuse of on-street parking,
creating traffic and health hazards, specifically with regard to the clients or to the traveling public in
general, such may be a reason to hold a public hearing for the purpose of considering the
suspension or revocation of the permit. The applicant can and must assume a major role of getting
her clients to park on site or get rid of such clients.
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 7
17. The proper legal requirements for advertising the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of
Spokane County have been met.
18. The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as necessary and
appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public interest and general welfare.
19. Various performance standards and criteria are additionally needed to make the use
compatible with other permitted activides in the same vicinity and zone and to ensure against
imposing excessive demands upon public utilities, and these shall be addressed as conditions of
approval.
20. The proposal will not be detrimental to surrounding properties, once an adequate
parking and circulation design is approved and built.
21. The proposal does not impose excessive demands on public utilities.
22. The proposal, as conditioned, is compatible with uses permitted outright in the zone.
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor
APPROVES the proposal as a temporary conditional use permit for a home industry through
March 31, 1996. An approximately additional six-month period of time is established for the
construction of the parking lot and circulation improvements before this permit may be
administratively renewable or be designated as a permanent permit.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. GENERAL
1. The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in interest
but shall not run with the land. The business at the property may only be carried on by a blood
relative of the present applicant/owner, Charlotte Stevenson. The Division of Building and
Planning may from time to time review the relationship between the persons engaged in the
business and the residence existing on the site, including taking into account ownership of the
parcel. Any decision the Division of Building and Planning makes with regard to these matters is
appealable to the appropriate appeal body.
2. Failure to comply with any of the conditions of approval contained in this decision,
except as may be relieved by the Zoning Adjustor, shall constitute a violation of the Zonino, Code
for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropriate.
3. The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site plans or the
conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zoning Adjustor to be within the context of the
original decision.
CASE NO. CUE-222-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 8
II. DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING
1. The applicant shall contact the Building Section of the Division of Building and
Planning at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code
requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act.
Design/development concerns include: FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE
HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUII.DING ACCESSIBILITY;
CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL
PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS.
2. The applicant shall bring the accessory building into compliance with the appropriate
standards for assembly and the operation of such a business within one (1) year of the resolution
of this application or coincident with the installation of parking and circulation improvements,
whichever comes sooner.
3. The proposal shall comply with all applicable standards of section 14.616.240.4 of the
Zoning Code of Spokane County unless deviations, variances or exceptions have been lawfully
granted.
4. The applicant sha11 comply with the following.
a. By February 1, 1996, the applicant shall cause a permanent, weatherproof sign to
be placed on the outside door of the dance studio which shall read generally as follows.
This message shall also be given in writing to new and all renewal clients.
"NOTICE TO CLIENTS OF (NAME OF STUDIO):
ZONING REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT CLIENTS USE THE OFF-STREET
PARKING WE HAVE PROVIDED ON THIS PROPERTY TO THE MAXIMUM
EXTENT POSSIBLE. YOUR FAILURE TO COOPERATE BY PARKING ON
THIS PROPERTY MAY JEOPARDIZE OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE TO
PROVIDE DANCE STUDIO SERVICES ON THIS PROPERTY."
Evidence of compliance shall be provided to the Division of Building and Planning.
b. On or before March 31, 1996, the applicant shall provide the Planning Section of
the Division of Building and Planning with a site plan of the front yard north of the existing
residence, breezeway, garage and studio building. The site plan shall indicate the retention
of the spruce tree on the west end of the front yard and shall include a loop driveway, eight
(8) client parking stalls and two (2) employee parking stalls. It shall indicate the concrete
slab's removal and shall indicate appropriate signage to d.irect drop-off traffic into the more
westerly driveway entrance and allow for its exit from the more easterly driveway entrance.
The more easterly ingress-and-egress point shall provide an exit for loop traffic and
an entrance-exit point for the personal driveway of the applicant, the two (2) parking stalls
for employees and the eight (8) parking stalls for clients. It shall also provide for a safe,
no-vehicle zone eight (8) feet in front of the studio building, as a safeguard for pedestrians
entering and leaving the building. The parking plan shall also show curb stops adequate to
keep automobiles from damaging the east property line fence. The parking stalls and
backup/turnaround areas shall be generally consistent with standards of Chapter 14.802 of
the Zoning Code or some other, similarly acceptable standards. The Planninc, Sectiocl of
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKA.NE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 9
tlle Division of Building and Planiling, in consultation with the Division of Engineering and
Roads, will be the judge of adequacy of this plan.
The lot shall be ind.icated as graveled and shall not be indicated as being paved. The
loop driveway may be paved or graveled, at the applicant's option. Landscaping shall be
included in the front yard area around the easterly parking lot ingress and egress point in
order to clearly define it as an entrance and exit location. The design of the loop driveway
shall be respectful of the true property line with respect to the curb and a five (5)-foot-wide
reserve future acquisition area, to the extent that the loop driveway shall be able to function
entirely if property acquisition occurs up to a point approximately thirty-four (34) feet from
the front of the house; that is, the loop driveway needs to be completely functional in the
area of thirty-four (34) feet north of the house. This standard may deviate if the property
line is shown to be other than about thirty-nine (39) feet from the house.
The above drawing shall be prepared by a civil engineer licensed in the state of
Washington, using standard design features and practices for parking lots and vehicular
circulation areas. The drawing needs to be accurately engineered and drawn to scale. A
landscaping plan shall be prepared as a separate drawing or included on the engineered
plan. These professionals are encouraged to consult with the undersigned.
5. The improvements described above, upon approval by the Division of Building and
Planning, shall be constructed and in place within six (6) months after written approval of the
design by the Division of Building and Planning.
6. Failure to submit a professionally engineered design by March 31, 1996, to have it
approved by June 1, 1996 and have it constructed by December 1, 1996 shall automatically void
this permit. These dates may be extended, depending upon any appeals filed and subsequently
heard and any other approved extenuating circumstance.
7. If compliance is achieved in the process established above and this permit is to become
a full conditional use permit, as opposed to a temporary use permit, a letter of such certification
will ind.icate the achievement of full conditional use permit status. That letter will be mailed to
opponents of record in the Zoning Adjustor and/or Board of Adjustment hearings and is appealable
as an administrative decision under the provisions of the Zoning Code.
8. An expiration date for the conditional use permit will be established in the letter
described in Conditional of Approval 11.7 above. Renewal may occur under the following terms.
a. Renewal may be on a time frame of whole-number years, to a maximum of
three (3) years at a time.
b. Approximately thirty (30) days before an expiration date, the applicant shall
request renewal and pay any appropriate, established fees. The Division of Building
and Planning will attempt to send a notice approximately sixty (60) days prior to the
expiration date.
c. Periodic regraveling of parking and vehicle travel areas may be required.
9. The applicant shall seek and receive a certificate of occupancy or change of use permit
on or before June 1, 1995.
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 10
10. The applicant may continue to conduct dance studio business while complying with the
above.
11. At any time, the Division may require more parking or limit the number of client
students.
12. The days of the week and hours of operation shall be as set forth in Finding of Fact and
Conclusion 2.g.
13. If the Division of Building & Planning believes there are extenuating circumstznces
associated with the renewal of the permit, it may cause there to be a public hearing and
reconsideration of the permit; the notification expense shall be that of the county if sucli
reconsideration takes place.
14. The Division of Building & Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released,
in full or in part, by the Division of Building & Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide
as follows.
The parcel of property legally described as is the
subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative
Official on , imposing a variety of special development conditions.
File No. is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane
County Division of Building & Planning.
15. The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record wit11
the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way
and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part,
by the Division of B.uilding and Planning. The notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following.
a. At least five (5) feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way
and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along 4th
Avenue. NOTE: The County Engineer has required zero (0) feet of new dedication.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning
Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed sigils
should be located within tbe future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities.
If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at
the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may
be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping,
parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 11
III. DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Any new facilities shall connect to public sewer, and additional fees shall be paid.
IV. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
3. Water service shall be by a new/an existing public water supply when approved by
the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project, and individual service
will be provided. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized.
V. DIVISION OT ENGINEERING AND ROADS
1. A strip of property five (5) feet in width along the 4th Avenue frontage of the subject
property shall be set aside as a future right-of-way acquisition area. This property may be acquired
by Spokane County at any time that arterial improvements are made to 4th Avenue. A title notice
shall be filed in the Spokane County Auditor's office indicating this reservation.
NOTICE: PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED
TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERNIITS MAY BE RELEASED
PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD. HOWEVER, THE
COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY
THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON
APPEAL.
i
;
~
DATED this~„~ ay of December, 1995. ,I
THO%iq G. OSHER, AICP
djustor
Sp~kane Cou y, Washington
,
FILED: ~
1) Applicant (Certified/Return Receipt Mail)
2) Opponents of Record
3) Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads
4) Spokane Counry Health District
5) Spokane County Division of Utilities
6) Spokane County Division of Building & Planning, Permit Coordinator
7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
8. Spokane County Zoning Enforcement, Attn.: Allan deLaubenfels
9) Division of Building & Planning Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File
CASE NO. CUE-22-95 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PAGE 12
NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN
(10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY
$215.00 FEE APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY DNISION OF BUILDING &
PLANNING, PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING, 1026 W. BROADWAY AVENUE, SPOKANE, WA 99260
(SECTION 14.412.042 OF THE ZONING CODE FOR SPOKANE COUNTY). DEADLINE FOR APPEAL
IS 4:00 PM ON JANUARY 8, 1996.
HD/FCU-ZA DEC
Z s'`
7
u
S P O K A N E
U U N T Y
_9 'v.~ =t;; 3..t
DEPARTMEM OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOP.
June 26, 1996
Joel G. Lee, P.E.
Metro Engineering, Inc.
9616 East Montgomery
Spokane, WA 99206
SUBJECT: CUE-22-95
Stevenson/Tiffally Dance Studio
I recently received the comments from the Division of Engineering & Roads with respect to the
preliminary site plan submitted to us on May 31, 1996. The following are shortcomings which
need to be addressed in a resubmission. Recall a resubmission must be forthcoming within 14
days of your receipt of this letter.
1. County road standards allow only two driveway approaches per parcel. Therefore, one
of the three driveway approaches must be eliminated. In order to not restrict your
design, I would leave to you a solution of how to eliminate one of the three driveway
accesses.
2. Although traveled surface areas for a commercial development ordinarily need to be
paved and accompanied by stormwater disposal swales, the Zoning Adjustor's decision
recognized this as a hybrid of residential and commercial, consistent with the purpose
and intent of the zoning regulations to retain residential appearance and character.
Therefore, the Zoning Adjustor did not require paved surface areas. Additionally, a
stormwater "208" swale is not required, as normally related to a paved parking and
travelway area. However, you may wish to consider such stormwater disposal for
another reason, as suggested below.
3. The drywell, which is located in the proposed exit driveway, is a county drywell located
substantially in the public right-of-way. As such, it cannot be directly used as a
recipient of nonpublic drainage. Your site plan indicates a drainage flow from the
parking lot, and at least a portion of the driveway, to this drywell. Additionally, the
Division of Engineering & Roads staff informs me that such drywells suffer excessive
and premature problems or failures due to vehicle abuse and are frequently clogged
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
BvtLOttvG I'HONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703
PLANNiNG PHONE: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243
•rnn• «noNz1n _z1«
~
Joel G. Lee, P.E.
Metro Engineering, Inc.
June 26, 1996
Page 2
with gravel from the nearby graveled surface area. I will leave a solution to these two
problems up to you; but, note that it might be possible to locate the exit driveway east
of the existing drywell and rearrange the parking area. It may be possible to park one or
two cars on the inside or the outside of the drive-through loop.
4. Driveway aprons must be asphalt. Apparently, the entry approach apron is some
surface material other than gravel. I am sure you can address the design to
accommodate this comment from the Division.
As you draft a revision, please keep in mind the need to accomplish a timely response.
Thank you for your continued input. I look forward to receiving and reviewing a plan revision.
~
~Yenior ~MAS G. M SHER, CP ~
Planner
~
c: Charlotte Stevenson, 13618 East 4th Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Susan Tiffany, 4207 North Murray Road, Otis Orchards, WA 99027
Brian Ragen, Attorney at Law, 316 West Boone Avenue, Suite 680, Spokane, WA 99201
Scott Engelhard, Land Development Coordinator, Spokane County Division of
Engineering & Roads
~
FC[1-CUE-22-95 LEE LTR
. ,
.
ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET
VARIANCE FILE # CUE-022-95 _95
COIIIPANION FILF, #
• Related File }t t ~
Date to Review 10/25/95 Time 9:00 # 1
Date Received 9/20/95
Project Name CONTINUE USE DANCE STUDIO No. Lots No. Acres 13,7SI~
Range - Township - Sectioii
SITE ADDRESS 4TH E 13618/S 4TH/W EVERGREEN PARCEL # 45221,0101
Applicant's Name CHARLOTTE STEVENSON Phone # 924-04-`-
Address 13618 E 4TH AVE Phone 2.`~
SPOKANE WA 99216
FLOOD ZONE No W S School Dates Conditions mailed
01\71Ci SAME
Address
Phone ' Address
Phone / FAX FAX
Planning Contract Person Phone # 456-2205
Date Submitted Description Initials
~
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING I
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 13 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED
ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS -LOTS
BOND RELEASED - ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
HEARING EXAM APPROVED DENIED- APPEALED BBC / PROJECT APPROVED DENIED
BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED
STAMPEDMYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL/SUZANNE)
/ / STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY)
. •
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478
- qONDTTTON T, TS . .RMT'T' -
TO: Spokane County Planning Department, Zoning Adjustor
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard(::".
DATE: October 23, 1995
SUBJECT: VARIANCE #CUE-22-95 / STEVENSON, CHARLOTTE
.
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced
application. The following comments are offered for inclusion in the
Findings and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the request be
approved.
E19 The word "applicant" shall include the owner(s) of the property, his/her heirs,
assians and
~r1 Thr- Ccu?Zt-.,~,- ~r;~er al t > .oa:i ,1an ;ciez1'- Jf;a,. u.~- ~ a 'i0 ,-,ot C„~11 ~
. ~:c=-
Arterial. The existing right of way width of 50 feet is not consistent with that
specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is
recommended that strip of property 5 feet in width along the Fourth Avenue frontage
be aet aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the
time when Arterial Improvements are made to Fourth Avenue.
I
,
. •
~
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
V `
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAmEs L MnivsoN, C B O, DmFCroR De*ns M ScoTT, P E, DmEcroR
NOUIICIE fDIF 'L7.'F0XA1`]E Cr-IDUNUY 7L0NRI1' kDSi~ °U0IR? PUIBILEC
Iffi3A wHHG ANIID TnIR`IPIHI'GMIIMP L =-KON
DATE October 25,1995
TIME: 9:04 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE Spokane County Planrung Department
Comnussioners Assembly Room, Pubhc Works Bwlding
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM 1 FILE: CUE-22-95
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HOME INDUSTRY (dance studio)
LOCATION: Generally located in Spokaue Va11ey, south of and adjacent to 4th Avenue,
approximately 600 feet west of Evergreen Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 22, Townslup 25N,
Range 44EWM, 13618 E 4th Avenue
PROPOSAL: Apphcant proposes to contuiue a dance studio in an exist,mg detached structure on
a lot. The lot also contains the applicant's residence. Sections 14 401 101 and 14 616 240 4 of
the Zoiung Code of Spokane County allows trus use upon issuance of a conditional use penrut
The use is currently illegal and the apphcation, if approved, would allow the use with condihons
EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residentia13.5 (UR-3.5)
SITE SIZE: Approxunately 13,750 square feet
APPLICANT: Charlotte Stevenson
13618 E 4th Avenue
Spokane, WA 99216
WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
Environmental Checklist and other data was reviewed and the project was found to not have any
probable sigruficant adverse unpacts to the physical envuonment A Deternunation of Non-
sigruficance (DNS) was issued on September 24, 1995 on behalf of the Spokaae County Building
& Planning Director, the responsible official under SEPA. The Envuonmental Checkhst and DNS
were sent to 5 agencies of junsdzction or expemse and identif'ied pubhc interest orgaiuzations.
Comments regarduig environmental matters will be accepted at the heanrig Fornial appeal of the
DNS may be filed Contact the Division of Building & Plannmg for details
Physically Disabled Access: AU meetings and hearings will be conducted in facilities which
are sccessible to disabled individuels. For more information, please contact t6e Spokane
Couaty Division of Buflding Planning at (509) 456-2205.
NOrI'E: THE ZONIlNG ADNS'POR WILd, ISSUE A WRITTEN DECISION'PO APPROVE OR DENY THE ABOVE PROPOSAL.
ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY APPEAI. THE ZONING ADNS"POR'S DEQSION AND MUST
DO SO WITfUY TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF TfE DATE OF'THE DECISIONS SIGNING APPEAL MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A$215 00 FF.E F1LED AT'THE DMSION OF BUII.DING 8c PLANNING, PUBLIC WORKS BUII.DING,
1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Section 14 412 042 of the Zocung Code of Spokane Coun T[~ ABOV_E _
R~1CID F1LE MAY BE EXAIVIINED AT TI~ DMSION OF BUQ.DWG & PLANNING l~~~~
r. ~~~~1110"ED ~
1026 WESI' BROADWAY AVENUE • SFOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
Btn[.DIIVG 1'xotvE (509) 456-3675 Ffvc (509) 4564703 ~ SEP 20 1995 ;
P1.ANNING PHONE (509) 456-2205 • FAx (509) 456-2243
TDD (509) 324-3166 ~
SPOKAfiJE C6UC47Y ENGtMEER
~ d -
,SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-970) Section 11 10 230 (3) Deternunation of Nonsignificaace (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
FILE NO: CUE-22-95
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL. Apphcant proposes to contuiue a dance studlo in an
existuig detached structure on a lot. The lot also contains the apphcant's residence Sections
14.404.101 and 14.616.240.4 of the Zonuig Code of Spokane County allows this use upon
issuance of a condltional use pemut The use is curnently illegal and the apphcation, if
approved, would allow the use wrth conditions.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: October 25, 1995 at 9 00 a m
PROPONENT. Charlotte Stevenson, 13618 E 4th Avenue, Spokane, WA
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY•
Generally located in Spokane Valley, south of and adjacent to 4th Avenue, approximately 600
feet west of Evergreen Road, in the NE 1/4 of Sectron 22, Township 25N, Range 44EWM,
13618 E 4th Avenue
LEAD AGENCY• SPOK:ANE COUNTY
The lead agency for ttus proposal has detemuned that rt does not have a probable significant
adverse unpact on the environment if nutigated as stipulated below An Envuonmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is not reqtured under RCW 43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after
review of a completed envuonmental checkhst and other uifornaation on file with the lead
agency. This ulformahon is available to the pubhc on request
There is no comment penod for ttus DNS, pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (1).
(X) Tlus DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2), the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regardmg t.tus
DNS must be subnutted by agencies no later than 4•00 p m, October 20, 1995, if they
aze intended to alter the DNS. Citizen comments will be accepted at the pubLc heanng
Respoasible Official: JAMES L MANSON, Duector, c1o Doug Snuth, Planner I
Spokane County Division of Bwlding & Planning
1026 W Broadway (MS-P)
Spokane, WA 99260
(509) 456-2205
Date Issued: ~x.,=~ Signature `j CON~IIV~NTS REGARDING ENVIROr~V~NTAL CONCE ARE LCOME AT THE
HEARING
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
Spokane County Plantung Department, 1026 W Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260.
Ttus appeal must be wntten and make specific factual objections Contact the Planrung
Department for assistance with the specfflcs of a SEPA appeal
HD/CU&22-95 DNS
,
DNS, File No CUE-22-95 Page 2
A copy of the DNS was mailed to:
1. Charlotte Stevenson 2. Spokane County Health District
13618 E 4th Ave. Attn Steve Holderby
Spokane, WA. 99216
3. Spokane County_ Division of 4. Spokane County Fue Protection
Engineenng and,Roads Distnct #1
Attn. SEPA Review
5. WA State Department of Ecology 6. Spokane County Division of
SEPA Revie,w Building & Planrung
Olympia, WA 98504 Attn: Tom Davis
HD/CUIE-22-95 DNS
!
~
y-Ir _
-ci
SPOKANE O~.DIN..N'~ E
ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION 11.10.230 -1-
~
~
~
R
~
5POKANE ENYIROHMENTAL OROtHA1ILE
W4, 147-11 960} Section 11 10 230(1)
Envtronmental Checkllst
ftle Na
Purpose of Chectltst
The State fnviromental Po11cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43 21C RCH reQulres all qovermental agenctes to constder the enviromental tmpatts of a proposil
petorc aeicing decislons An Environmental Impact Statertent (EIS) must be prepared for a11 proposals vith propable signltlcant adverse lmpacts on
the quality of the envlroment Tbe purpose of this checklist is to provtde inforatiatlon to help yov and the agency ldentfty impacts tran yaur
proposai (and to reduce or evold lmpacts trom the proposal 1t 1t can be done) and to help the agency detlde rhether an EIS is requlred
Instructions for Applicants
Th1s enrtroneental checkllst asks you to descrlbe sone bastt lnfor+nation about your proposa) Governmental agencles use thls checklist to Aetermine
whether the envlronmental impacts of your proposel are stgrtlflcant Tequlring preparation of an EIS Ansxer the questlons brletly with the most
preclse lntormation kna+n or glve the best destrlption you csn
You avst answer each question accuratc fd C.. u a ly to the best of your knarledge In aqst cases yau should be able to answer tre questions
froe yeur own observatlons or project plans xithout the need to h1re ezperts lf you really do not knox the ansuer or if a questlen dces eot apply
to your proposal xrite do not know or does not apply Ganplete answers to the questions no+R may evo1Q uaneetssary delays later
Soae questions esk ebout qovernaental regulatlons such as zoning shoreline and landmark deslgnations Answer these questtons {4 yau Can if you
hsve problems the governnental agencles can asslst you
The checklist questtons apply to all partz of your proposal even tt you plan to do them orer a pertoA of ttme or on 41fferent parteis of land
Attaeh any addittonal leformation that will Eescribe your proposal or 1ts envlronoentel effects The agency to vhith you submit thls checklist may
ask you to explaln youc ansvers or provtde additlonal infonaation rensonably related to detenaining 1f there may be signtticent adverse 1mpaet
Use ot checklist for nonproject proposals
Complete thls checklist tor nonproject proposals even thougA questlens eaay be nnswered does nat apply
tN 11ODITION caAplete tbe SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NOKpQOJECT ACTIONS(Part D)
For nonproJeci actlons the retereeces ie the checklist to the wards pcoject appitcant end property or iSte should be read as proposal
proposer and affected geographlc area respectlvely
A BACKGROl1M0
1 'laam of proposed project if appltenble NV ~
1 Kaae ot Appllcant to-
3 / Address and phone nunber of appllcnnt or contact person ~L c-
I ._1
4 Da te eheck l i s t prepared eJ v/ ` vJ, I
t
S Aqency reQuesting checklist ~ . ~
6 Proposea tlming or scheEule (lncludinq phasing Zlk applicable)
~ u
7 a Oo y~u hare anr plaes tor [uture addlttons expansion or turtfier actirlty related to or connected Ytth thls Oroposal7 It yat expla/n
#
b Do you ewn or have optlons on land neerby or adyacent to tfiis proposait lf yes explain ! y y ~
• o
8 llst any envlronoeetal inforasatton you knox about that has ban prepared or will be prepared direttly relsted to thls proposal
Rer 2/1/88 l
~
t seos.ure etNYROMIEcrTiu. oF.ssixuNcE
(t7AC 197-L1 960) 5 crlo 11 Lo 270(1)
4 BAqCGBO4T'D ( t n t 1 ou d)
9 do Jou looov vAeth r pplic tlona p adi g for gov rnm ntal pprov 1 t othe prop sal dir etly alfecting the prop cty covered by yoar
propo al Tf 7 splalo
~/AI
~
I
10 Llsc any goveromeoc pprov ls or permits th c vill be n ded [or youe propo al iE Imovn
11 Cive a brle[ complete d reription of your proposal ineluding the proposed use• •nd the sise o[ the project ted •ite "here are •evetal
Qventioas Lcec ln chis cheekllsL tiuc ask rou io deseribe eertain aspects of your proposal You do noc aeed to cepeaC those atuvess on ehis
*
/We pn ~~-fICdlJC~ 1 G `
>
- ~ i
1- LoeaLion ot the pcoposal Cive su[[!ct nc inlormation fot a petson to urtderscand the yieelie lou tloe o[ rouc psoposed proseet ineludiag a
seraet addreoo if anr and sectton Cavs►ah1p aed rsnge it knovn IE psopoul vould oeeur ov c a range ot asea Provtde tl+e cange oT
boundariea oE the •ite(s) Provide a leg 1 descriptton aite plsn vleinity aap and copogtaphlc map if reaaoeubly avaiLple Vhile yw
ahould auDaic aay pLoA ceaulred b7 che ageney you ace eot reauis d to dvplicate aaps or detalled pLna su6mitced vith aap paesit appllracion
reLted to ehis cbeckilst
17 Coea the pcopoeed actlon 11e vithin the Aauifec Sensitlve AYea (ASA) -hc Ceneral Sevet Service Area! "he Pciosicy Sever Secvice Area• -he
City of Spolcane (See Spolcane Couoty o ASA Overlar 2oee Atlns Ioc boundar!
"~0 SL CQlPS.L"Cp bT APFLICAHL
I IISVI80R`QR".AL IIVSHiS
Evaluatioe Fo[
1 E11R'1i Agancr Use Oolr
a Ceoeral de criptioa of cl+e site (circle one)rolling hllly steep slopes aouacaiaous
(_ft"J~l
other
t '
b 11hat is the sceepcst slope on the aLce (appcasiaate petetnt slope)t
e What geaeral [ype• o[ soils ate found oo the oite (Eor exaaple claY sand gcavel peat syek)'
IE yot~ lmov the eLso}iluti of agricultural soils •peeitr thev •e►d oote anr prioe taeeLnd
d Ase there surface loditatioos or hiotorr of unsiable soils in the tmaediate vieini 7! It so
anseribe
z
K
r -
SPOKAME EHVIRONMENTAL ORDIHlINCE
(HAC 197 11 460) Sectton 11 10 230(1)
8 ENYIRO1QiEnTAL EIEMENTS(continued)
Eveluatlon For
e Describe the Agenty Use Only
purpose type anQ approximate quantities of any t1111ng or grading proposed
indlcate source ot till „ n
~
lt of clearing constfuction or use? If so generally destrlbe
f Could eroslon 77/;1 s a resu
g About what percent of the slte rrill be covered wlth lmpervious surfaces aiter project tonstruc
tion (for example asphalt or bu11d1ngs)7
v
h Proposed a+easures to ~ed e or control eros/on or other impatts to the earth 1f aey
,Gy~
~
2 AIR
a 11hat type of enissions to tAe atr vould result from the proposal (i e dust automobile odors qD1J7dYI,J1T7,,, C,-rL`I 1~SldtiV 12t1YV1
lndustrlal vood smoke) during constructlon and when the prosett is compieted? lf any
generally describe and give approximate quantltes 1f known ~•D0J,p'~
~•a LY/~
p'1►L" j
b Are there any off slte sources ot emlsstons or odor that may affect your proposel? If so
generally describe r,
/ v , - ~'►.~,r ' y ~ t i'~ ~ F
~
c Proposed measures o reduce or control emisslons or other lmpacts to a1r if any
~
_
3 KATER
a Surtate
(l) Is there any surface xater body on or 1n the Imraedlate vteinity of the slte lncludtnq year-
round and seasonal streams saltwater lakes ponds wet{ands)3 If yes describe type and
provtde names approprlate state what stream or rlver 1t tlows tnto
t jf . ~J 5
(2) w111 the project requtre any work over tn or adJacent to (wlthin 200 teet) the descrl0ed
vaters? If yes please descrtbe and attech avatlable plans
,
w
r
SP01GlNL LNVIROFlMTLAL OAOItiJ1HCE
(.tAC 197 11 960) 5eetion 11 10 230(1)
6 ClNIAON`MttiAL £LLMN'S (eontinued)
Evalwtioo For
Agencr u.e onlr
(3) Escimace the amount of Iill and dcedQe wterial tlut vould be pLe d in oc teooved from t}►e
urtace v tar oc vetlands and indleate the ares of tl+e aite that vould be ffected tndieate
tAe source of i111 msterial
~
I
I
1
i Yl11 the ro osal re uire suclue ~+ste[ vitldcavals ot diverslo~ut Cive a r
p p p general dencrip- ~
tion purpose and approslaa[e qvantities iE knovn
irl~~ ~
(S) Doe cfie proposal ile vithin • 100-yesr Ilaod pLia+ Ii ro aote locicion on the aite plaa ~
!l, ~
P
(6) Does the pcoposal involve aor discharge• of vute aaterials to sur(ace vacecet I( so
descsibe [fie type of vaste and •ntieipated volume o[ dlreharge
b Cround I
(1) Vill groundvates be vlthdravo or vill v&Lec be dirchatged to grouedvi cest Clve Qevesal
desccipcion purpoae and appcoxioats auaatities ii lmovn
~ . -
(2) Dscribe vasce macerial that vill be diseharged in[o ehn geouod trom septie eank• or othnt 1 ~ ~
saaitacy vasce treatxnt taeility Desetiba the geaeral •i:e of che syntm the e►vabes ot ACG~~~~~7 ~ ~AV ~ _
houses to be served (if appliuble) oc the number of peraons tha systea(s) are expeetad to
s
l~%r~e ~ 5 ~p t yq-ntJJ, w ~ t I-,"
s~.p n
.9 G ! 1'~ ►v 4 M AOC'44-
(3) Desctibe any mystesa other than those desi6ned tor the 41sry ~~r
po~al of unita va~te ~ ~~'~j'VYV +
installed tor the pu[pose o[ Qisehacging [luid• belov tAe Qround surtue (ineludea syateag sueh
as those tor t1u diaposal of stose vatne oe draiw6e fraa lloor draieu) Describe the type of systen tl+e asount of mstneial to be dieposed o[ tArough the srstea aad the trpe• of r+steriaL t i
likelr to se dteposed of (lneludina oatesisl• vhlch wy eater the •ystem loadvertently through
spills o[ as a resu1C of [lreilghting aetivities) q
(4) Vill aor chmieals (eipeeially orgaaie solveata or pntsoleus tuals) be scored La sbovn-
sround or underground scosa6n taoksT It so vhat cypes and quantttie• of matetials vill be
stored
1
v u~ ~
4
~
w
gp01CAHE Et1VT&OMSEN'LAL ORDItIANCE
(VAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
D CNP1ROttlMti41. ELLMf"S (concinued) Evaluatioe Por
Agepcy v.a onlr
(S) WI►at protecctve oeasucee vill be taken to inaure ttut leaks oc spille oE ae7 themieals
tored or u ed on aice vill not be alloved to pereolate to groundvacer (this ineludes eeasures ~
to keep chemieals w t oE dispos 1systev■ described in 3b(2) anA 3b(7)T
I
~C
e Vater Runoft (ineluding @tocv vater)
(1) Describe eAe sourte ot ruoolt (laeludiag atoen vater) and netlod oi eollection aeA disposal
iE aay (include quantities 1( lcaovn) Where vill thla ueter tLov V111 chir watet tlov inco
ether vaters tf so deseribe
~A 7LX .
y (2) Jill any chemicsls be stored handled or used on the slce !e a loution vhere a•plll or
leak vill draln to surEsee or groundvater or to a stotu vater dieposel syscm digeharging to
sucface o[ grounAvacer'
/ / /7
- 'r
(3) Could v scn materials encer g[ound ot suriaee water@t If •o aenecally deserlbe
1
d Ycoposed neasutea co r duee or eonsrol wstaee ground and runoff v ter topact$ tt aey (i[
t tha pcopos d•ction li vithia the Aduifec Sensitive Area be espeeisllY elear oa explana[ioos
r relating ta laeilities coneerning Se [ioa~ (4) ~(S) ad 3e( of this ehecklist) `
~S~
~,r~~,~~t
~ Y~~ ~ ~ L `''v► g E' ~ ~ ~
~ t'~E
,r511 4) , ;1`7 fl
l f+ ~
4 F[,lLNiS
a "heck or circle cype o[ vegecation tound on ebe site
deeiduous tree aldec oaple aspen othet
~
evergceen cre tir tedar pine other
i
hcubs
~ gcas•
puture
crop or scaia
vet soil plant• cattail putteteup bullrush sktmk casbage othar
vater plants wter lilly eelgrass ailfoil ochec
other type• ot veRetation
b Vhat lciad and asount oE vesetation vill be rmovad or altesed!
e Lisc tAreatened or endaagered specie lnova to be oa or aeas thn site
d Broposed landseaping use of native p Lncs or other seasure• co prese r►e or eahante vegetatioe
oa ehe .sea tf •ny ,
,
5
SPOKAttE ENYIRONMEftTAL OROINANCE
(VAC 197 11 960) Sect~on 11 l0 230(1)
B ENYIROtWENTAI EIEMENTS (contlnueQ)
Evaluatlon For
Agenty Use Onty
S ANIMALS
a Circle any blyds and animals whlch have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site
btrds hawk heron eagte songbirds other ~IC~YJ-~.c~~ , J~""~~''✓'~- ~
memraals deer bear elk beaver other
/
fish Dass salmon trout herriag shellfish other
other / t J'y-
b L1st any threatened or endangered spectes knwn to be on or near the stte
c Is the site part of a migration route" If so explatn
d Prvposed ceasures to preserve or enhance xiidlife tt any
5 EHERGY ANO RATURAL RETOURCES
a What k1nds ot energy (electrtc naturat gas wood store solar) wtll be used to meet the
the completed project s energy needs3 Oescribe whether tt wil) pe used for heating manufat
turing etc
. _ .
b would your projett affect the potential use ot sclnr energy by adJacent propertles? if so
generally describe
/ b
~
c uhat ktnds of energy conservation features are included in the plens ot thls propossl7 llst
other proposed measures to reduce or control energy tmpacts 1f any
/ %
/ , -
7 ENYIROttMENTl1L HEALTH t ~
a Are there aay environmental health hazards fncludtng ezposure to toxic chemicals risk ot tire
and exploslon spill or Aazardous waste that cou1Q oaur as a result ot this proposal? It so
describe
~P~
(1) Descrlbe specia) emergency rvtces tAat might be reQulred
* 'J( -v
6
~
ti
SPOKANC ENVIAOIMN'fAL 0&DINA.t7CE
(VAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10 230(1)
E L't7I ROHNBTtCAL L{,ZKE27'TS ( e on t 1 nu d)
Lvalu tion FoT
Ageoer u oray
EttViROTCffrrAL HEAL"R (concinu d)
(2) Proposed me •ures co reduee or cootrol tronm ot 1 h lth h z rds !t nr
f
i+ i in 1
l
b Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area vh14h may afEeet youc pro3eet (for euupiet ttatlie
Quipmeot operation och r
- t
(2) What trpee snd levels of noise vould de ereated by or •isoelaced vl[h che projeet on •
short-term or a loeg-tecm b ais (fos example craffie construction operation other)' Indicate
vhat urs nolse v uld eome Erom the site
~
r
< < / ~ _$7 7
(J) Propps~ed oeasure to reduee or eontrol noise lm ta 1[ a~y
t) +L </I t~C'. ~ ~/~i ~-~1 J i ✓ ~ c c
8 L►.ro AttO SktORELitle us6
a What is ehe eurtent use t the site &nd sdjacent proPerties'
. ~
b itas the site beea used for egrieulture Ii o deseribe „
e Describe any struetures on the oite .
d pill any •tcuctures be deoollshed! It •o vhith!
e What is the eunent soai n
ng elusiileation ot tf►e sitei
t What is the eurreot eaepsehensive pLe designatioo ot the site! ~~ll
g If applicable vhat in the turrert •horeline aastet progsam dcsignation ot the site!
~
b Ha• any part oi the site seeo elassifled a• ao enrironaeatally •snsitive aeeaT It •o
•peciiy
-r
i Apptozlaatnly hov oany people vould r ide ur vork in the eoapleted projeetf ~ I ~ v^
J J
7
I
~
SPOrAl7L 1MIa02MCN'fAL ORDINAHCE
(VAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11 10 230(1)
b CTNLRONlSLNTAl. LLL~MNTS (eontinued)
:valustLon For
Agenty Voc Onlp
S Approxlmatelr hov maar people vould the compleced projeet dispLce
k Pcopo d oesaus s to •void or reduc dleplacment lmpaccs it any
, f
1 Pcopo ed aea uce to aesuce the proposal i• eompatible vith c:iating aad prosected Lnd uses atd
~pians if aar n 1
i
~
9 HOUSLNG
AyyYOxim telr hov maay unit• vould be provided it anrf Indieace vhether high- aiddle- or I
lowincome houoiag r
b Appro:imately !wv maay ualto if iny% vould be elislm tedt Indiu tc vhethec kigA- oiddle- ot
lov--income housing
e Pcopeeed neasures co teduee or eontsol houaing iapaets !t any
"h
i i .
30 AES?IIETICS
s tthat is the tallest height of any propooad st=ueture(a) nos ieeluding antem►aet 1iltist it the
priaeipal e:cerior buildieg material(e) proposcd?
K ~
D wAat vieve in the immediate v!clnitr vould be altered oc obecruetedt
kl~y
e Propo d ee ure co r duee or eon[rol seothette imp ete !t anr
l?/ /;r
' Y
11 LICH' AND CI.ARH
e .That type ot ligfit or L re vill the proposal producei .fiat time ot dar vould !t mainly oceus!
b Could ligAc or g Lre Eron the iioialud psoseet be • oatety hasatd os lncectere vith viewt
c W!►at exietiag otf-site soureee oi light or g Lre aay aitatt rour proposall ~
k
d Proposed measure• to reduee or eonceol llght aad gL re impaets it aay ,
./l1 ~
w
~
sror.Axz ENvittoM(Et+ut. oanixAxce
(VAG 197-11-960) S ction 11 10 230(1)
S LNVIROtMLRiAL Ei.EME1ttS (eontinued)
Evaluation YoT
Ag ney n e oaty
12 RSCAEATIOtt
Hl+at d igM t d od in[ormal recreatio ml oppostunities atce in che lmmedist viciniCr
y
b Vould th ptopo ed proj tt dlspLee any existing ceeteatloaal usefT I( o de crlbe
~ .
e Propoeed measures to ceduce ot eontrol impacts on reeseatiea ineluding cecreational opportnai-
ties to be provided by the proJeet oc appllean[ if aar
13 HIS"OAIC AND CUL?URAL PAESERVA"IOH
a Are t1u re any plaee• or objects listed on os proposed Eos natiom 1 •tate or loeal praseeroa-
[ion regisCer• knovn co be on or aext to the sitet IE so 6enecally deseribe
J2 r)
,
b Cenecally deacribe •ny landmarks or evideeee o[ !►istoric arehaeologieal setencl[ie oc eulcural
ieportance fa+ovn to be on o[ neat to the sitc
e Pcoposed neasure• to cedue oc eontrol iopaec• ii sny
16 TT.At1SPOVATIOH
a Identify publie street• nd highvars setving tha site and desecibe pcoposed aceess to the A„ ~T
exietiag stt t@rec m Shov-on site plans it anr
l ~L. r C t ~L G A'+V ~ t riY4
~ ~G.~~~iGl ~l~1-[y~-,_.~--- ~~'ZL..~ f~ ~ ~~L _ _ ~ r~ /t ~ ~v~-t•y_.
J r ` ~ ~J t.~ I , l. t~ ~ W u VCt
~
-
b Is tite currentlq erv d by public traotitT It aot vhat 1s the apptoxim te distanee to tha ,4
nearest tranrit stopt
~iF- $ po6GR+f~ ~ G~ ~Y
c Rov sanr yarictag •paee• vould tAe eoupleted projeet luvet lbv aaap vould the prosect eliaiaate ~
i .J ,v:-1
~
te~j t~ uF
d Y111 -ap repuite aor aev roade or •eroet• or iuprovemeats to a:iscina roads os streets 0TXV-1"- ~~VGG
oot includiog dsireva7s• Ii •o ;eaetally deseriee (lodieate vbathee public or pcivate)
~
~
e Will the proJect vee (or oeeur in the imediata vieinlt7 ot) eater rail or air erassportatioat
it so Qennrally de cribe
.
L
9
~
SPOR/JiE LIMAOH!ffiNiAL ORDI2iATiCL
(tiAC 197-11-960) Secttoo 11 10 230(1)
D L2IVIAOtQQlf'.AL LLQMNTS ( oatiaued)
Bvaluation Pot
Ag aq Ose Onlr
j
( Aov manr vehieul trips per day vould Dc gen cet d by the ewpleted psojeett I( knovn G~L ~ N~~~ ro
Lndic te vfren pcak vould oecur 7. /S~ ru~sm rM-L;-e 4
~ -TI415 kQaAlag VML,Y
fy,{ PS V60- n6S ~0~~ ~v
g Proposed measure• to r uce oj conttol tc rtatioa Lmpaect }Eanyt
~ r / G✓~ ` ~ c.l Ed~G~S _~1~ ~ ~~.~.5
~
i
15 PUbLIC SERVICES
a Would the psojecc resulc in an ineressed nc d[or publie services (tor exaaple [ir proteetioa
po ca pre eccion health esre scl+ools ochet)! It so enetally descsibn
b Psoposed aeasuces to ceduce oT contsol direc impaec• on pu011e sarviees i anr
16 U'ILI•IES r
a Ci ut! eurrencl at the sice eleetrie ra tasal~gas ate sfn~
TRa
erv teleph e ~itatr sRVe sep[!e syseem o r
b Destrl0e the utilicins thst are proposed for the project thn utilitr providiag tlre serviee and
the general eonstevction activlties oe the site or La the lmmediate vicinity vhieh mlght be
reeded . A
f f 7 ,C f d~
~
C SIGNANRL
I
I the undersigeed svear under che penalty et perjury chat the asove respot+ses atn eaade ttuchtully aad to ehe Desc of sy kaovledga i also
unders[and that should [here be any villful ml@represents tion oc villtul Lek of Eull diselosure on ary pare the a en aar vithdrav aaY
detesainatioo of noeuignificaACe that it nl6At 1•ua !n rellance upon thi• CAeCklist
4
7
Oste Propooeot K?
a
pi~Y~ l~J~ t Ot pC)
"TY~/Nf -u. •~rr, . ~~-~_"_S ' ~ ~ 5~ f~ 7` ~
~
Fro
ponent
(Signature)
rl,one,,,:~~
Verson eoopletieg tosm: Oata
4`5
phone 0l4( '-7
+
t0A STAYT USE ONLT
Statf amles(s) seviaving eheeklisc t~dwb P, `~11'►,~1 I7 f PtAftspk _17-
3asad on thto statf teviev oi Che envicoaneotal chaekliet and otl+es p rtia nt lAfosmatLon t1►e staits
Contluder tl►at thece ace ao probable si6nifieant •dverse impact• aad reeommends a dntesnioation ot ooesiantfieaoce
n Cooelvdes thac probaele sisnilieaat advesse eaviroeaeaeal lapaeto do e:ise ter the eurraat propesal aad reeeamend• • deisaend dnceY-
sinatioa o[ oonoigoitieanee vith eooditions
C Coacludes thac cher r proEaDl ignlfic at adver e eoviroameotal impacto and retmmends a de[eraination of sl6niiluaee
TILINC YM - f75 00
/n .
~G 3 00 . G ~
-
J7
~ d
Ve
el;z,'
;2p
~
su I
~
.
,
.
G
WG~
l~'~-` L N~. ; s
e,9LL ~
~
LOG/
a-~-V, a / & s s
C~~-~--
~ ~
~ ~ .
_
_
~
3
~
~
~
Y V I
fe~,
~ ~ E ~
.
.v
, ~ ' fo!✓~ -Ti-~~~s~K / rcr~rcdso~- ~ Cu 6:
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PL.ANNING
Name of Apphcant It-VQ He Slfe.vPwso, Agent. Y
ev
Street Address /3 ~hzr T= &4MAr c-
7ap Phone - Home $7,oR 41-0f2,f-
City iv e State G!/1l' Code t1a//~ Work
Agent's No
Name of Praperty Owner(s) ~~r a~p 7~fP -S~7`eveV~'O 1v
Street Address 13 6/ k- a i~,a ~4v-c
ZIp Phone - Home g7Ay oy~ y
C1ty State UJ14- , Code Work.
REQUESTED ACTTON(S) (Clrcle appropnate action)
.
Vanance(s) Conditional Use Permit Expansion of a
OthezT Nonconfor~ming Use
r~du6 ~i4~'y a cwAtc el s" ta ,
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
1~ ViolaaoA/
t3ectioq Township Rangg ~-t Enforcement Q N
•F'ue DistncL *C:WWP sewer purveyor _ 4mKgytA- C-b ~
~
CWSP waLer purveyor CUP standards meC Y~ N~
•Eusting zone e&& ' 3 S •Cite apphcable secaon. 14 f0 1 Uj 240 kT/
Comp Plan designaaon, , ~
~/~++r ~M Artenal Road Plan designatton~A~l/Q.. '61l,eG~~'~ I~G
•Cnacal Areas WetlancU Habitat , Geologic Aquifea , and/or Floodmg
Lot, legal & add'1 ownership checked by __EZ~/ Person doing preapp conf
Oth~er/~previous Divis~on of Planning acaons involvuig this property _41 f:~V'Pr ~25 .
SEPA complete appLcation date,
~f
~
Certificate of Exempaon No IV A Apphcation No G"
Hearmg Date S Vanance site plan dimensions checked by, ' ►
ABOUT THE PROPERTY by appticant)
•Existing use of property jffZj L[JY A iQ.t/r t 5 Lritn /W
•Descnbe pro osed use of the property, ngtin,change from'exisang use' `
_ . -ft •If a vanance apphcation, state the Code standard and dgpnbtAe vanance sought in comnarle
ter,ms (i e, 50 feet from centerline verses requued 65 feet)
*If a condhtional use permit apphcation, dces proposal meet all standards? Y N
If not, has one or more vanances been requested? Y N
+ •If HOME IlvDUSTRY, has consultation occuned with Division of Buildings regarciing
construcnon of building for intended use? Y N
•What is the size of the subject property 4 o-Lj s ~/qo ~ skdk,. b i5 30 X}~g '
• Street address of property (if known) t3,telre E ti5AbLf:
•Legal descnption of property (include easement, if a phcable)
dga! r~~
.4
•Parcel No(s) !:ZS ZZ 1
•Source of legal a- cs ~ c f-,a ~ c~.t
•Total amount of adJouung land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent _ALo Nc
•What interest do you (apphcant) hold m the property? _fl? 4,/~
SfATE OF WASHMPON ) SS
QOLJIV'I'Y OF SPOKANE )
I S'WEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERNRY THAT (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR ALTI'HORIZED AGENT POR THE
PRnFOSF.U SIIF f2) IF NOrI"fHE OWNER, WRTI'IEN PERMISSION FROM OWNER AUI'HORTMG MY ACI'IONS ON
F iS/1FMBIIiAI.F YS ATTACHED- AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMFlM
AFt}: MMADE 'PkJI'tiPUL LY AND'PO'IHE BEST OF MY O
Signed aL~ J ~
Notary Pubb in and for the state of Was}ungton residmg at
_ My appointrnent expires _ fc) -KS _ !9 f_.7_
page 1 of 2
~lzn nW ,tt~ti a~s) c~_
~ L' o Ms ~c /~,o-4r ~ ~'o /z bsg f L~l s-~ ~ ~~,•c ~ k r 1~~. Ati ~ oCNq~Gc
\ ~
.
i
A BURDEN OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant)
It is necessary far the apphcant or his/her representative to estabhsh the reasons why the
REQUESTED AC.'I'ION should be approved and to hterally put forth the basic argument m favor
of approving the apphcatioa. Accondingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
acaon (vanance, conditi.onal use, etc ) designed to help you present your case in a way wluch
addr+esses the cntena wIuch the Zorung Adjustor must consider Please fill the form out and return
it with your apphcation
B SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
(applicant must visit each agency whose no is circled below)
~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
a) Proposed method of water supply UP,r o`
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal Se c~
A prelu7unary co ~ on has n held to discuss the proposal The apphcant has been mformed
of req ts s e request consultaaon wnth Division of Planning Y(ID
(Signature) (Datie) (Sign-off Waived by Plannuig)
v 2 OUNTY DIVISI ON OF BUILDINGS
TRY ONLY A prehminary consultation has been held to discuss the
proposal The apphcant has been uiformed of requuements and standards for the bwlding, based
upon the proposed use
Si a ' y ate Si -off Waived b Plannin
C~ C~ ~ ) C~ Y g)
3 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS
~ relunulary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal The apphcant has been mformed
of r ments , tandards We request consultation with Ihvision of Plannuig Y N
~ -
G6 ~ r 3a- ~s
~
(Signa (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
~
✓ 4 ~IPOKANE C4UNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (Division of Planrung may waive
if outside VIWMA)
A preliminary consultation has been held to dzscuss the proposal The apphcant has been mformed
of requuements and standards
~ 68- 30 - 9~-
(Signatu&e) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Plannuig)
The apphcant is reqinred to chscuss the proposal vvith
to become mformed of water system
requuements and standards (See #a below)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal wnth ~l.1-ir/,~S
to become informed of sewage disposal
requuements and standards (See #b below)
a WATER PURVEYOR \12FZ4
The proposal located wnthin the boundary of our future service area
2) The s located vvithin the boundary of our current chstnct
R;Ppo
3) W /arp abl
e to serve site v~nth adequate water
m
4) t~sfacto angerne xia e_not en e to e is proposal
(Signature) (Date)
SEWERAGE PURVEYOR vP &4rzO To .91isr~x4G _456,e*
cAll A preliminary consultauon has been held to discuss the proposal The apphcant has been
mformed of em
fi n an
d dards
(Signature) ~ (Date)
FID2A APP atBV 4195) page 2 of 2
~
.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FOR
,
Name ~e d ~s~ a
File
V CONDTITONAL USES State Law, Section 36 70 020 (7), clanfies that the County
regulations must specify the standards and cntena that shall be
apphed in the review by the Zolung Adjustor Additionally,
condiaon of approval may be added to asswre companbihty with
other uses in the same zone ~
A Assuming the proposal is hsted as a"permitted" condiaonal use, do you believe the
proposal meets all of the requu-ed, estabhshed and applicable standards?
r ~/1
B If you cannot meet the conditional uses required standards, are YQ-U seelang relief by
applyuig for an ad.nunist~rrative exception or a Vanance? Yes (!9 (C`u'~r~ccle One)
C What have you done or could you do to
1 Make the use compatible wnth other permitted activiaes ui the same vicimty or
r ~
G~ ~~Q~ C~ l h (1
' J
~
2 Ensure against imposing e cessive demands upon p bhc uahties?
,
y ~ s ~ l
~ G
D Explain how or why the proposal will not be detnmental to
1 The ComPrehensive Plan,ff"--I( rd~ ~4-&,e _
07- . li-, and
.
~
2 Scurounduig ProPertY
/ /W)AZ
U
E What reasonable restnctions, condiaons or safeguards will uphold the spuYt and intent
(health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Code AND nutigate any adverse
effect upon the neighbanng properties including but not luYUted to 1) time hmits, 2)
front, side or rear yard greater than nununum stated, 3) suitable landscaping, 4) signing,
5) off-street parlang, and 6) others?
G. /119,/C_,/Ct~ ~ ~ A 1[_!1 IA b-G° a 4~tll S A~7 e-
~
,I&e .~7 e -a, r:.l,,
17 14, a/z-i SS J-Xi,,9-7 eS ,
d
CUP BURDEN OF PROOF FORM
REY 1191
Na Pfe-e- Ps;J 9--36-0s 1
SFOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
Name of Apphcant 01 4-9f off e sf'"easo,,, Agent: Y
~
Street Address 4= 61'X,*r e_
' Z'ip Phone - Home Vy-oJQ
City N e State GlM' Code i122~~ Work.
Agent's No
Name of Property Owner(s) a,4Aly -1tP -fP veA.1610 Iv
Smeet Address 13(,,1 rr E y73 47 -c
7ap Phone - Home qyty oy~y
C'ity ~Ca-~v n State UJA- Code Work.
REQUESTED ACT'ION(S) ((Srcle appropnate a,ction)
Vanance(s) Conditional Use Perrmt Ecpansion of a
Otherf Nonconformmmg Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Violaaon/
Secaon Township Ranp Enfarr,ement: Y N
•Fue DistncG -CWWP sewer purveyor
•CWSP water purveyor •CUP standards met Y N NA
•Busang zone •Cue apphcable secaonT
•Comp Plan designaaon, •Arteaial Road Plan (lesignaaon
•Cnacal Areas Wetlands , Habitat Geologic Aquifea , and/or Flooding
•Lot legal & add'1 ownership checked by •Person domg preapp conf .
•Other/previous Division of Planrung acaons involving tlus property
SEPA complete apphcation date,
-Certificate of Exempaon No Apphcaaon No
•Heanng Date •Vanance site plan dimensions checked by,
ABOUT THE PROPERTY by appliCant)
•Fmstin use of ~ ~ ar
$ prpperty 0-ti" rvr a.v.• ~ s ~,a
•Descnbe pro osed use of the properCy, noang,cha_rTe from'eansang use' '
•If a vanance apphcaaon, state the Code standard and dclpmbe the vanance sought in comDarable
terms (i e, 50 feet from centerluie verses requued 65 feet)
•If a conditional use permit apphcation, dces proposal meet all standards7 Y N
If not, has one or more vanances been requested? Y N
+ •If HOME IINDUSTRY, has consultation occmred wnth Division of Builduigs regazcUng
construction of btulduig for intended use? Y N ,
•What is the sizre of the subject groperty 4 o-L s E"f/4ilo ! s ~ s 3d x~'g '
•Street address of propemy (ff laiown) t3 wsr iff ti*Ab~
•Legal descnption of property (include easement, if apphcable)
Z /
4-ff
•Parcel No(s) ~
•Source of legal zo- I c
•Total amount of adjouung land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent ~QQIc
•What interest do you (apphcant) hold in the property? m tvnJU
STATE OF WASHINGPON ) SS
COiJIV'IY OF SPOKANE )
I S'WEAR, UNDER PFNALTY OF PERJ[JRY, THAT (1) I AM THB OWNER OF RECORD OR AVI'HORIZED AGENT POR THE
PRPRr3SF,D SII i14) IF NOrI"IHE OWNER, WRTI'IEN PERMISSION FROM OWNER AUTHORMNO MY ACTIONS ON
Y'.~SM1t BEHALF 15 ATTACHEDAND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND'IHOSE ON SUPPORTlNG DOCUNENTS
A.M. MAI)E TRUr'tIFTJY.LY AND'PO'IHE BEST OF MY
- " ~ ~ Signed ~v
Notary PnbL m and for the state of Washmgton, residmg at
My appoinhnent eapms . !O -45-- !9 L;Z-
~ page 1 of 2
FrorrA nr4 adh 405)
-4c doMs'W 1.144roti ~2 ,bH fL~<.~ kr lof
~
A BURDEN OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant)
It is necessary far the apphcant or hWher representative to establish the reasons why the
REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to htierally put forth the basic argument in favor
of approving the apphcation AGCOrdingly, you should have been given a fonm far your requested
action (vanance, condinonal use, etc ) designed to help you present your case in a way which
addresses the cntena which the Zonuig Adiustor must consider Please fill the form out and return
it with your apphcation !
B SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
(applicant must visit each agency whose no is circled below)
1 SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
a) Proposed method of water supply
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal
A preliminary consultation has been held to dLscuss the proposal The apphcant has been uiformed
of requuements and standards We request consultation with Division of Plamung Y N
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Plannuig)
WORSHPO OKAN E COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
ME INDUSTRY ONLY A prelurunary consultation has been held to dmuss the
proposal The apphcant has been informed of requuements and standards for the buildmg, based
upon the proposed use
oC 6 [q,
~ ~ -
:J J (SignaturbY + (bate) (Sign-off Waived by Plannmg)
3 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS
~ relunuiary consultatlon has been held to discuss the proposal The apphcant has been uiformed
of r ments. tandar~ds We request consultanon with Division of Plarming Y N
e -.~o-~S
~G6 ~
(Signa a (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
4
✓ 4 POKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTIIrITIES (Division of Planrung may waive
if outside WWMA)
A prelummary consultanon has been held to dlscuss the proposal The apphcant has been uiformed
of requuements and standards
(Signat&) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Planrung)
The apphcant is required to dmuss the proposal with
to become informed of water system
requirements and standards (See #a below)
The apphcant is requued to dmuss the praposal anth
arwz~' to become informed of sewage disposal
requuements and standards (See #b below)
WATER PURVEYOR•
Q~
The pmposal not~ocated wnthin the boundary of our futm service area.
2) The proposal isfis not located withun the boundary of our cuaent distnct.
3) We able to serve this site with adequate water
4) Satisfactory anrangements have/have not been made to seive this proposal
(Signature) (Date)
SEWERAGE PURVEYOR vi° AU:)O -ro ~,I~isTi~rJG _5oerA /z! 2 t'
A prehmmary consultauon has been held to discuss the praposal The apphcant has been
uiformed of
G~M n and odards
000
(Signature) ~ (Date)
HD= nM UMv aAS) page 2 of 2
. .
► .
~ Date: PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT
Number:
Name ~ Phone Add ress
Comments:
~
CUSTOMER ROUTING
~
~ BUILDING Department > . : .
,IANNING Department . . . : JENGINEER "S Oepartment '
~ Addressing _ Admin. F.xception Approach Permit
C Building Permit ~ Arterial Rd Plan Info Ftood Plain Permit
E Code Information ! Binding Site Plan Info ! Public/Private Roads
F Commercial Review i Cert. of Exempiion ~ Res. Bldg Perrnit Rev.
! Conference ~ Comprehensive Plan . Site Drainage Info
E Enecgy Code Info ! Cond. Use Permit Subdivision Review
[ Fire Safety Review i Nonconforming Use i Utility Permit
~ Manufactured Home i Permit Review ~ Zone Change Review
EMechanical Permits _ Shorelines Info ~x~ L- sZ Z Q 1~ I
EOther Permits ! Short Plat Info NO FEE REQUIRED
` e ie "Iime out
~
[ Plumbing Permits i Subdivision Info
C Private Road Info i Tecnp. Use Permit ~ UTILITIES Oepaitment
E Residential Review i Variance Appl. APA Payment
E Sewer Permits _ Zone Check i Cert of Fxemption
F Zone Info ! Subdivision Review
F ! ULID/Sewer Info
F _ Zone Change Review
F
F NO FEE REQUIRED ! NO •-E- RX- QUIItE- D
Reviewer Time out Rviewer Time out Reviewer Time out
MAS'TERIPASSPaRI.CiR 2/1l4v3
~%..:r ~j
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
q . . , .
DJVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A Dtl!ISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARThtENT
William A. Johns, P.E., Caunty Engineer
!y. .)llJiili .l 1 lilifli
107 N. Murray Drive
Itis n~ch.lrt~s, A ~D920?
ItE': 13unt~ ~~'or Paving
Dear Susan:
Please finc[ enclosed your clieck that we were holding for the bond for the paving
that was done for the dance studio. We have inspected and accepted the job that
was done and we now consider tlie matter closed.
~
If you have any questions, please call Bill Hemmings at 456-3600.
Sincerely,
E3i11 Hemmings, PE
Development Services Engineer/Manager
cc: File
1026 W. Rroadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-017() •(5(ly) 477-3600 Ff1X: (5()9) 324-3478 TDU: (509) 324-3166
IV-' v `4-
I BRENDA S. TIFFANY-EICKERMAN 17 2 6 4207 N MURRAY RD 226-0147 98-574/1251 ,
OTIS ORCHARDS, WA 99027 ~ .
y ~ l
lum I Vv` ~~j~~.."~. S ~1 fl ~ I ~ SeS~curtr!~~iur.~
' . ~ 1l~
7'7~ '~i~ia c u~c~
Valley Office
~RNIERS & P.O. Box 14588
, Spokane, WA 99206 .
~ 1 : 12S L O S ? 4 Li: LO L00 50 3 LBn' L7 2 6
R- ' 9035
~
ECEIP T Date~`' ~ic~~-
Received From,
Address -42C' ?
Dollars $
For `E~
,E , F`,~,,~'i+✓ ~i~ ~~/u ~:'c,r ~T,-'~:~:7 ~ ~ ~ :
ACCOUNT HOW PAID
AMT.OF ~ I I CqSH
aCCOUNT
AMT. PAIO I ~ CHKK
BALPNCE I ~ MONEY BV
;,UE ORDER 7
~ ~ • 1 ~1
~ eKaos ~~o
1
Parcel: 55021.0138
Owner: TIFFANY, SUSAN J ~
CoOwner. ~
OwnerAddress ~
4207 N MURRAY DR OTIS ORCHARDS WA 99027-8712
~ ~ -
Site Address
4207 N MURRAY DR OTI
/ j
/ r
Legal Description
E FARMS IRR TR PL 1 S112 OF S112 TR 35
~
~ ~
;
- M '
/ , .
i
~
/
;
;
~
/
~
W-M
/
Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended for reference use only
Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency.
Parcel: 45221.0101
Owner: TIFFANY JR, JOHN & BRIDGETTE I(
CoOwner: I
Owner Address ~ - !
13618 E 4TH AVE SPOKq
NE WA 99216•0601 -
_ - C~ ~C► - _ ~
Site Address
13618 E 4TH AVE SPQ
Legal Description
MOORES SUBURBAN HOMES ~
LT 1, 8LK 1 TOGETHER WITH W 15FT pF VAC MqMER RQ S OF - I ~ _ -
FOURTH '
STEOF&ADJTQ
- -
, ~ I
_L C) y
L
EE777 _
~ _ ~-1--- T-
~ ~ i _ - ,
~ ~ _ ~ ,f j
,
Notice This is not a legal document. Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant
Legal documents shouid be obtained from the appropriate agency.
revision. It is intended for
reference use only
.
~
t ,
CuEm22m95
~
ru • .i Z
m ~
t V
w ~
~ A Llu
~
vaL
~
~ VALIrE`~ WAY ~
W
O m
T W MAtM
~tN ^ 2 . R~
< r. . r
• ? Z ~ A+vL
v ~ Z
a R aug~ v .
i1oE ~ v ' cf O
, , No 2312
t~ ~ # + ' i ~ • _ _ ' AV E,` , o. St M
Porach'
N 1~
L~ C*M
Q ~ ~'ti•J ~ ~
Z 4 T H AV E•
m
~ iu TN 7
i J
~ ( r 0 ~c t°T~ A.
rt
,
aa.Goue10 z'
ic6 o,yr Ty d6s~ .77r+r~ 7TN . ~
,V Ll
~ t 7 TM A t ~
7TNAVE N U '
w ti 3
~ 81N ,AVE ; s
22
J t ~
TM ~ ;
/►V C ( Q ~ !
T ~ T ~►~I Q - - 44 ~
O ~ ~ Gll~a GZFs '
• T F~
12TH
E2T "AV ►3rr
E . _ . . . . Z , ~ ' ~ '
N ~ : u~ HIFKM
N/► V T E
~i - 13TH ~
~ V
~F"i~N J-z.-
15 H A V
.
~ t* qf• ~T T.~''
J
tt. v x ~ ~ ui
wlc,4r _
~
7- o C~
~ Ao
d
.....--r-
: r ~~a t I~ ~ v~
~
~ • t
n ~
67 pA- h r~ ` 1
r M
1. ~ i
` reeze
.rc~
_ , ~
~
,
• _ ' f-,-„'..' J ~
04 k
~ -