VE-22-91
r
~
BLDG. PERNTIT # - or - FILE #
Date to Review~-~- 01 Time #
Date Received ~
Project Name 6,0,4~-~~ No. Lots No. Acres
%
~J ~
SITE ADDRESS ~ 3Q~, ~ . c ~ PARCEL
S - t - t
Sponsor's Name . , Pegfdr A 1
'`hone # - 7 Address ~7 Work #
Date conditions mailed
Contact person Phone #
FLOOD ZONE Yes _ No _
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Nam(~
Water Address
Sewe r
School
Planning Contact Person Phone #
D,itt Submitted Description Initials
~
1
v~ h f r }Ja~~t
jr .v ~1 tir/ €~Yi ~ " f ~~"~~)'..r S d , • _ i ~ K r'-~ t ~'^i'. " 1 C' 4 ' ~y rd' s. r- " ~1~~
t S ~i 3 4r
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
5 '
PHONE 456-2205 ' SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANE GOUMTY COURT HOUSE
No 1111C1E (DIF SPOKANE COUN11 ]1 lLe~~~~ AIEDXlLJsy Jl OIR 1FlVlIDlti11C
IHI IE A II8 II NG
DATE September 11, 1991
TIME: 11:00 a. m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE. Spokane County Planrung Department 15 391 (
2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Builduig
721 North Jefferson Street
Spokane, WA 99260
~
AGENDA ITEM 5
File: VE-22-91
VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM FLANKING STREET YARD SETBACK
REQUIREMENTS:
LOCATION: Located in the Spokane Valley, on the southwest corner of Sprague Avenue and
Best Road in the NW 1/4 of Secnon 23, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, 14306 E Sprague
Avenue
PROPOSAL: Apphcant is requesting pernussion to build a canopy covering for dnve up
banlang vcnth a 12 foot flanking street setback from the property luie, whereas, section
14 628.325 3 of the Zonuig Code of Spokane County reqwres flanking street setbacks to be a
minunum of 35 feet from the property luie
EXISTING ZONING: Regional Business (B-3)
SITE SIZE: Approximately 25,300 square feet
APPLICANT: Secunty Pacific Bank
AGENT: Jerry Ressa
815 W 7th Avenue
Spokane, WA 99204
NOTE ONLY TBE APPLICANT OR AN OPFONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL
VVITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF TI-E ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING APPEAL
MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$100 00 FEE APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT TBE
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIlVG DEPARTIVENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUII..DING,
NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOK:ANE, WA 99260 (Section 14 412 042 of the Zorung
Code of Spokane County)
RP-VE-22-91 Ressa-Agcnda Septemba 11.1991
. . ~ /:i: :1 ~ . . , ' . . . . .
. ' ''<<. • . . . .
SPC)K:ATIE COUN'TY: P:::. . G DEPAR'Z'MENT. .
APPLICATIQNS BEFO.R HE z,ONINC'Y AD 1',USTnR
' • ; ,';:i,~ . . , , • : . . , . • . . , ,
Certificate of Exemption No.: APP, lication No.:~~=-'1~~~~~
. . . . .
Name of Applicant: ~ Agen CY> . . - • . ~
S tr-eet A
1~ryq<1_'V ddress: W P3 / _ 4 . Zip Phone - Home: - City: ~ S tate: Code 'Work: -
. gent's No.:
Name of Propeirty'dwner(s):
Street Address: oA 4'?t~
~ Zip , hne - Home:
City: S tate: Code: Work: - -
. . ,
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropri ate action): Variance('O Conditional Use Pezmit Expansion of a .
, Nonconfornn.ing Use.
FOR STAFF USE ONLY , Violation/ Section Township ange'`~~-- Enforcement: YN
~
•Lot and egal checked by: •E ement Iegal checked by. .
•C'WSSA Water (puzv )r): •U.t,ID A e n N
-Existing zone: • J plicable Section• ~
•Arterial Roa.d Plan desi ation: •Comp. Plan designa ' OMMG-~l~+ -
•Fire District: •Personnel doing preapp conf.: . Ql;op
•Other/p vious IannSri_ artment a' s involving this pmperty: V: .
•1 iearing Date: •Maunt agreement checked. by:
ABOUT THE PROPERTY •Existing use of property: 6---Z 00F16e (571~WZC ~X l577/, ( 5^ k.
•Describe proposr.d use of the property: __AfeaN ~~2ZV17W . Q~_
•If a vari ce a g-atLqn4j~e th Code standard 'and describe th variance sought in comparable
terms : ~ • ~ 2 4 ~ a,-wt 3 -1='; S ~
. , a condiaonal use permit. application, does proposal meet all standards? Y' N. If not, has one or more variances been requested.? Y N.
•What is the ~ e of the origi.nal parcel i 's pro osal is a recent or proposed division?
• a ,
•Street address of property (if known):
•Legal descri don of ro crty (include easement, if applicable): Z3 25 y
~ NW : /b~l ~ P/~o ~ ~Y/tiIO 6-
~
•Parcel No(s).: 4 2 2 . qa?~
-Source of legal: ~Oc1ti1"~ ,e S
•Total an~ount of adjoining land controlled by thzs owner, sponsor and/or agent: /I0h45_
•What interest do you (a plicanj) hold in ZfeV; rty?
/ G/ ~ ~ZGC1~.°/T7 &=f(C. 5AV1C
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S .
COUrI'r1' QF SPOK:ANE
1 SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD QR
AUTHORIZED AGFNT FOR THE PROPOSED SI'TE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTF-N PERMISSION
FROIvi SAID OWNER AUTFiORIZING MY ACI'IONS ON HIS/HF.R BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3)
ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING A S AR.E MADE
TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDG .
-~~.e•~~~~` Signed: -
SUE syq'~~ Address:
oE ~►,ti, is Phone~.No.. Date. o
• ~
T~ ' 0/. 1 - - -
. C4Pu li in and for the state of ashin~on, resi g
din
i at
My appointment expires: J~ c1.5
s
. /
t SMARdW
Y Page 1 of 2 . . _ . ,
,
. •
~ ` ~ -~h ' • ' . ' , _ ' : ' .
.i , . . . ' . . ' ' - . , . , - -
. . . . , ' I^ . ' ' . , .
`
A. BURDEN OF PROOF It is necessary for thc applicant or hisJher representative to establish the reasons why the
REQUEST:E.D AG`ITON.should bc apprnved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor
of approving thc applicarion. Accordingly, you shou.ld have been given a form for your requested
action (variance, cond.itional usc, ctc.) dcsigned to help you present your case ui a way which
addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return
it with your apPlicatiorL . .
B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT . . Proposed mechod of water suppiy: ~e KA- (,A-r-e (z
D~s~e•~'
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: SEwE.-,O, rCojrvTr)
A preliminary'consultaaon has been held to d.iscuss the proposal. The applicant has been infonned
of req ' eme~ts ~ ~1 va ~i 4,ice.~ N6
b ^c~ C
io A71 . . / ~ v 'T e o ~ c~ e Y_ s e'~S
` (Signature) (Date) (S ign-off Waived) Ivo cawF`ICT,
Qj2. SPOKAh'E COUNTX ENGINEERING DEPART.MENT
. A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the.proposal. The applicant
has n inFormed of uuements and standards. . .
~--/v--9 (
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
•3:. SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waive
: ifouzSiae wwMA)
. A prelimina ry consultation has been held to d.iscuss the proposal. The a plic t has been infornied
of requirement!~and standards. °A, . . .
(Signature) (Date) . (Sign-of f Waived by Plarirling?)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
. to'beconie informe of waler system
requiremencs• and standards. (See #4 below) . : :
: .
The applicant is requued to discuss.che _p.ropos.~al with
• . ~ to.become, informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards. (See #S beIow)
WATER PURVEYOR: . .
a The proposal L/is noc located within the, boundary of our future service area.
b) The proposal is/is not located wi.thin the boundary of our current district.
c) We are/arc- noc able to serve this site with adequate'water.
d) Sacisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to..secve this proposal:
. (S ignature) (Date) . ,
. SEWERA.GE PURVEYOR: . A preliminary consultation has bf;en held co d.iscuss.t}ie pro posal. The applicant has been infonned
of requirements and stand.ards.
. .
(Signature) (Date) : . . . .
.
. .
~ . - _ . .
. , . . . . . . .
- . . _ . . - - : .
' ' • . . j. ' •f '''~►,y y~~~~ ' .
" - . . :i . - - i • • f,v~l~t_
. . ;;t • . ' s 1 ~s .
i • . • - . . , , ' . r
, . . . ' • ' , ' . '•r~ `1..
' . , . . - .
. . 1
- • • ♦
' • ` 1•
page2of2
zA: Ap? .
REv; ir9t
y. _.y_ .'7 _ _ . . .
~1 ^ •
. ~ •
• r ° ~ i
1
VAR:IANCE BURDEN of PROOF Form NAME:
- FII,E NUMBER ' .
. x. .
Lnrroduction to this forna: . A"variancc" is chc means' by which an adjusmncnt is madc in thc application of the specific
rcgularions of the zoning classification for a. particular (the subject) piccc of property. This
properry, bccause of special.circwmstanccs applicablc to it, is deprived of privileges com.monly
cnjoye,d by ocher propertics in thc vicinity and in a similar zonc classifcation. This adjustment
remedies the difference in privil.egcs. A vanance shall not authoriu a use atherwise prohibited in the zone classificarion in which the property is located..
Thc following questions will hclp to detcrmine the outcome of your rcquest. Your request
re,quires accurate and completc resgonscs. First circle cithcr thc "ycs" or thc "no" answer(s).
following che questions bclow as thcy apply to your situation and thcn cxplain as nccdcd (in thc
spacc provided) to malcc your uniquc situation clcar. Certain phrascs from thc Spokane_County
Zoning -Codc-scetion -ofl-,vananccs- arc-ineludcd in thcsc qucstions: Thcy am
If your rcqucst is a ROAD FRONTAGE VARIANCE pleasc answcr only questions A,B,C,D,
and E. .
A. Will chis variance permit a usc which is otherwisc prohibited.!in this zonc? Yes 0Explain : ( 57N& ~ ~ /ZCi
. : . ,
, . B. Are there ~peciaJ ci~umstang&s (lot size,-shape, topography, location, access, .
surroundings, etc.) which apply to thc subject property and which may,not
not apply to ocher propcrtics in the 'vlcinilv? Yes~No)
Explain : LIS
. ,
* . , .
: -
C. Is chc subjecc propcrty der'nvcd of vri~n'le_gcs commonly cnjoyed bv o her
~.s~&rties in the vicinitv and in a'mil Lzone classiflcation?:Yes
r
Explain
D. Will this variance bc harmful to thc public wclfarc or to other propcrtics in
chc vicinirv and asimilar zone claasificarion7 Ycs $~_No ~
Explain: E. Arc thcre ocher si.m.iiar situa~ ' s in thc vicinitv in a§imil. rone classifi .tion? es~
" uses? Y , No .
Are LheY Fermitted uscs ~(7 . No Are theY "noncunforming -
Explain: ~
F. Could the subject propcrty bc put to a reasonable and pennitted. use by you or
another person withaut the requested variance? (.YCls No
Explain: .
G. If this :equesc is granted, will thc sub}ect property be morc cnvironmentally sensitive,
energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic progerty? ' Yes
Explain: ~ .
Over please ~
, Rev: 5/22/90 Pagc 1 -
. ~
. i
H. If this variancc is granted, will the broader public need or interest be serve,d? No I
Explain: ~
1. Will this variance be inconsistcnt with thc purpose of the zoning which applies
co the subject property? Ye Nc
Explain: J. Will approval of Chis variance grant to the subjcct property the privileges of a different
zonc classification (in othcr words would this bc a"dc facto" zone change)? YeCNo ~
Explain:
K. Will this variance be inconsistent wi[h the general purpose and intent of the
Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
Expla.in
. . Y •
L. Is this variance requircd for a reasonable economic return from the subjecc prope ~
-or is the cxisting struccurt too sma.ll? Yes >o
Ex pl ain : awOWC~
77-~f
?vi Did the practiQal difficultv which cau'sed you to apply for this variancc exist
before you owned the subject property? Yes No
,
. .'A -
Expl ai n:~~ 1~ Ogl S7AI (o ISU16~,?IZJ6 /9 7 074q<.s
.
&oax-ll ~w~.s ~t~ Z1v6r ~ 1~6A*1T 117,e"
If approved, would this variancc affcct land use density rcgulations which exist
co prorect the Rathdnu mlSpokane Aquifer? Ye~ Nc,~~
. .
Explain:
. .
. . . :
. 'he following space is for furthcr explanation. Your application will get becter consideraaon if
-,hat, how, and why you proposc your application is clcar. Attach an addicional page(s) if needed.
r
1
. t.
t,
ti
~ .
• c.
' . •
. j
►u are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in suppart of
s appIication (we have the equipment to display video tapes). No such additional material
-equired and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be
isidered in relation to this requested variance. Zf you have questions about the procedure
7e followed feel free to contact the Spokane County Planning Department (456-220s).
. Page 2
. . - . , . .
SPOK:ANE COUN'rY PLG DEPARTMENT
APPL.IC'ATIQNS BEFORE'THE ZQKTNC AD.TUSTQ~ ;
Certificate of Exemption No.: ~w Application No.:., - Name of Applicant: Agen Y Street Address: - '
, . WZip Phone - Home:
CitY: f' S tate: Code Work: -
.
" . gent's No.:
7~~)n
Na.rr-e of Property'Owner(s):
Street Address: An6 ~ -
i Zip
h ne - Home: S taCode: DWork: -
c~ry. _
REQUESTED AC'ITON(S) (Circle appropriate action):
Variance(s~ Conditional Use Pennit Expansion of a
Nonconforming Use .
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
, ~ Viola.tion/
Section Twnship66 Range Enforcement: Y, N
~
•Lot and eg cheocked by: •Easement Iegal checked by:
•C'WSSA Water (p or): •ULID Agreement needed: Y N
•Existing zone: ~ plicable Section, a
•Arterial Road Plan desl ation: •Comp. Plan designa ' OMM /A_
•Fire District: ~ r •Personnel doing preapp conf.:
•Qthertp vio us lannirig 3FM as invo lving this property: -Hearing Date: •Malnt agreement checked by:
ABOUT THE PROPERTY
•Existing use of property: 6''2 r,S~tp^C
•Describe propo sed use of the property: __CDNM zt-
lvWK.1&6 •If a vari ce. a ' a' n-me the~ Code standard and desczibe the variance sought in comparable
terms: ~ • r~ l ,
• a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards? Y N.
If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y N.
f
•What is the size of the original parcel if this proposal is a recent or proposed d.ivision?
•Street address of property (if known). _.dor 14&_Oj~
•Legal des~cription of ro crty (include easement, if applicable : Z3-25"-~ ~
~ IVGJ r ~ : ` 1(o~ Ei- QF 0/60 r- Z-YING S 0~ az oie '
~ r~
~ r G~A-fsfh~o•Parcel No(s).: 4423-Z . !?Ly_(Q
•Source of legal: e~Oclrv~~'}.'
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: it10k~5'
•What interest do you (a plicant) hold in the property?
.~~~•ti ~ ~r 67 Mc- ,Lj -cf,
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S COUNTY 4F SPOKANE }
I-SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNF-R OF RECORD OR
AUTH4RIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTFN PERMISSION
FROM SAID OWNER AUrHORIZING MY ACTIONS 4N HIS/F-IER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: .AND (3)
ALL QF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPP(ORTING DOC'LnvENTS MADE
TRUTHFULI.,Y AND TO THE BEST OF MY KN4WLEDG .
Signed: ~ ~ .
Address:
Phone No.: Date: O
NOTARY SEAL:
Notary Public in and for the state of Washington, residing at
. My appointment expires:
page 1 of 2 ~ .
.
. , . .
A. BURDEN OF PROOF .
It is necessary for the applicant or his,/her representative to establish the reasons why the
REQUESTED ACTTON.should bc approved and to litcrally put forth the basic argument in favor
of approving thc application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
acdon (variancc, conditional usc, ctc.) dcsigned to help you present your case in a way which
addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and reruin
it with your application. • .
B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DYSTRI ~T . Proposed methai of water supply: E~ CA- 4J~r~2 ~ ~sz,e.cr
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: -S EWE4 (CQoNT Y~
A preliminary'consultation has been held to d.iscuss tlie proposal. The applicant has been inforrned
, of req ' mets ~ LWXQcis c(A,ce~~ y tvG
G'(, fo /~'a 4 ~ -~'o I ~ s ic
~ i"1 1 I✓L ~ C~e Y;~ et C
(Signature) (Da'te) (Sign-off Waived) •~o co.~,F`►c-~-,
, 2. . SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING 'DEPARTMENT
. A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the.proposal. The applicant
has b n informed of uirements and standards. (Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
•3:. SPOKANE COUNTY UTYLITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Departmenc m3y waive
. - . ' if outside WWMA)
A prelimina .ry consultation has been held to discuss the pro,posal. The applicant has been infom7ed
of requirements"and stand.ards. ~ : i:f - . . . . . . .
(Signature) (Date) . : . . - .-(Sign-off Waived by Pla.ciriing?)
The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to 'beconie in formed of wa ler syst cm
requirements and standards. (See #4 below)
. . .
. .
The applicant-is requu•ed to discussth:e~proposal with to.becoine informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards. (See #S below) : . - _ . . . _ . . . ~t., .
~i. WATER PURYEYOR: . . . . . ; .
a The proposal jsfis,notlocated within the-boundary. of our future service area.
b) Thc proposal isfi$ not located within the boundaryof our current district.
c) Wc are/are- noc able to'serve chis site with adequate'water. -
d) Sacisfactory arrangements have/have not been made;torserve this proposal:
(S ignature) . (Date)
:
. SEWERAGE PURyEYOR:
A preliminary consulcadon has bf;en held to d.iscuss.the.proposal. The applicant has been infonned
of re,quirements and standards.
(S ignature) (Date) : ~ . . r. .
. .
, .
. . f, . .
' . • . . . ~,ti'''r • ' ~ = .
. . . .
• , . , . . . - • • . . .
. ..::~+1'' • . • , . . . . .
. . ' ' . , _ f.•y~. . .
. . . . . , .
. . . .
. ' . ,j..'J•'.µ', .
: • . . . ,;~:.`.t~•,r-i•'• . • , . •
~ . ' /~.'4. • • ,
.
. • • ' _ r.c i::'•.. . . 1':. , _ . , . . . . , .
page 2 of 2 .
zA: APP . . - , _
~ . ~ . .
REv; iA1
f . ♦
' . •l
VAR:IANCE BURDEN of PROOF Form KAME: ' •
- FILENUMBER
Inn oduction to this fornl. r . A"variancc" is the mcans'-by which a.n adjustment is made in the application of the specific
rcgulations of the zoning classification for a, particular (thc subject) piecc of property. This
propcrry, bccause of special,circumstanccs applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly
cnjoye,d by othcr propertics in the vicinity and in a similar zonc classification. This adjustment
rcmedics the differencc in privilegcs. A varianct shall not authorize a usa othcrwise prohibite,d in
the zonc classification in which the propcrty is located..
Tbc following questions will hclp to detcrmine the outcome of your rcquest. Your request
requires accurate and complctc responscs. First circlc cithcr the "yes" or the "no" answer(s)
following the questions bclow as thcy apply to your situation and thcn cxplain as ncc.dcd (in the
spacc provided) to maJcc your uniquc situation clcar. Certain phrascs from the Spokane County
Zoaing Codc. scedofl-on-vari,ances arc-ineludcd in thesc qucstions: Thcy are undcrlinu~: - If your requcst is a ROA.D FRONTAGE V'ARIANCE pleasc answcr only questions A,B,C,D,
and E. . ~
3 A. Will this variance pcrm.it a usc which is othezwisc prohibited^in this zonc? Yes 04,0D .
Exp la.in: j~5Z(57N& 06~~,
. ,
,
B. Arc there amial circumstance~ (lot size, shape, topography; location, access,
surroundings, etc.) which apply to the subject propercy and which may not
not apply to other properties ul the •cinitv? Yes~No,
Explain : ,~15' ~
~ ~p r
.v
4'•; t - . ' - .
~
. , , . y
A
i
C. Is the subjcct propc,rty '
. . . other
TL,~.rtie, in the vicinity and in as?milar zonc classification?b Yesl~vo
Explain
. _ . .
,
D. Will chis vari,ance be harmful to the publie weLfare or to other, properties in
the vicini~y and asimilar zonc classific:atinn7 ~ Ycs ~-f0~
Expla.in: .
~
E. Arc thcrc other similar situa ' s in the viCinitv in asimilar zone cla"ssification?C?es ~ NQ
Are they permitted uses No Are they "noncunforming" uses? No
Expla.in: - ,
; .
F. Could the subject property be put to a reasonable and pennitted'use by you or
anocher person without the requested variance? ~ Ycs No
.
Explain:
• Y . ~
t
G. If chis requesc is grantcd, will the subject property be more en~.vironmentally sensiave,
energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic property? ~ Yes Qcv>
Explain: ~ .
' Over please ~ . '
Rev: 5/22/90 Page 1 : .
'
.
1
H. If this variance is*grantcd, will the broadcr public nced or interesc be served? No
Explain: ,
1. Will this variancc be inconsistent with the purposc of the zoning which applies
to the subject property? Ye~ N(~ ~
Explain: J. Will approval of this variancc grant to thc subjcct property the privileges of a differenc
zone classificadon (in othcr words would this bc a"dc facto" Zone change)? Ye Zo
Explain:
K. Will this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and incent of the
Comprehensive PIan? . YesQNo, ~
<
Explain -
L. Is this variancc rcquircd for a reasonable economic return from the subjecc prope
-or is the cxisung structum too small? Yes o
Explain: ~UtGt1 Co ~15;/Zl Ue L» G~~C7PX' GJlG& Z-1Zrfr1?7✓CN~
77' ~'~'?1~16 s ~~~1 ~160
~
M Did the praCrica1 difficultv which caused you to apply for this variancc exist
before you owncd thc, subject property? Yes No •
A-.•
E x 1 a.i n : 1 ~7Gti/o ~U1~~lw6 D~
p ~ ~'r 4A
.
&Odx-/y ' /;Vt,dil/T ~~t"l~~ O~
19d26~bXYl atvffy l b.~4GLlGoGy
1,4. If approved, would this variancc affect land usc dcnsity rcgula[ions which exist
to protect the Rathdrum/Spokanc`Aquifer? y~ ~,Tc~~,
.
Expla.in: s •
- .
'he following space is for furthcr,explanation. Your application will get becter consideraaon if
.-hac, how, and why you proposc your application is clcar. Attach an addidonal page(s) if needed.
' F
. • 7 ' Y
. ~
. . . . . . _ i ~ .
w
. . ' ~ .
. 'l
• 4
~
)u are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of
s application (we have the equipment to display video tapes). No svch additional material
-equired and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be
lsidered in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure
~)e followed feei free to coritact the Spokane County Pianning Department (456-2205).
Pagc 2 -
. . .
. . . 'k.
r
I j
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE (70IiNTY, WASHINGTON
September 9, 1991
T0: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Current Planning
Administrator)
FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER t=-:
SUBJ: VE 22-91 / Ressa
re: Variances
The County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referencQrl
application. The following comments are offered for inclusion i!
the Findings and Order as "Conditions of Approval" should the
request be approved.
E19 The word "applicant sha11 include the owner or owne~-_ ot the
oroperty, his hPir_s, assians and successor_s.
E66 THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE ADVISED THAT AN APPROACH PERMIT MUST
BE OBTAINED FROM THE COUNTY ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION
OF ANY NEW DRIVEWAY APPROACHES. THIS MUST BE DONE PRIOR TO
THE RELEASE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
E69 THE APPLICANT SHOULD BE ADVISED TO CONTACT THE LOCAL FI
DISTRICT TO ASSURE THAT FIRE DISTRICT ACCE77
, . ~ n T T t 0 rn} iT- T i> 7 11 T- r; ~ 7 P 1-' 7 r, j(~" Iv~ : T
.
,
Engineer drainaqe r-~1 1-4
n~-.. ' _ C 1!' C '~I] I l f.~; t'-l 2" t:o r 1a 1 P U~i d k' 1~ 1,;7 ,4s
Principal_ Arterial. The existing right of way of 110 feet i:-
not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to
implement the Arteria]. Road P].an, a strip of property 10 feet
in width along thP Spraque Avenue frontage shall be set asid,
in reser.ve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County
at the time when arteria]_ improvemPnts are madP tn Spr_aque
Av#-n11P.
~
V ==22=91
t
t
Z I N I
~ A
~ f
S 1.0 C A T A D U W
16
0 C,ATI►. i+.s.~ait.orv cr ~ W • ~ ~
i r~ A ~
th. c ~
m AV L.
' -
~+s . 14
k! D ~
O •
l~i • Z
sa V ~ ' ~ ~ '
. O ~ ~ , - C • '
, VAL LEYW`tz
v ALLEY WAY
• . : , ,~,,~x~- ,
~ • ~ F. : ~ -~;_'r._:' X1--- or z
Z 0 W - ~f _ . .-c~'.::t. . • .
Ly
„
R'
SIDE
Z _ R,vE
< cJ Q ~ /
. ~ ~ -m SPRAGUE
, _ , . .
~ ~ .
_ N o z
0
/ ^ 1 • ,
I.i ~ lL
F% id Li ~,o 1 ~ ~ ~ -
. ~ AvE,~ .
co, ~ St M r N rs
Pa rocfii ,
U I
4 T H Av E. W I-AJ
D: .
v -2„Ts, ~ '"TM . '
J
W~ ~r . ~ OUf} ~ ~ [ 6TH TN
AVE.Z Z , rti ' • ,
0 Go udl~' ~ ~ ~ t .
'A•~AM
T+l • T1-1
b}`~ AV E °'s TT dSS~ 7T 7
W 7TM 7TH A
t ~
~ 8 T N Av E N u
~ _ . • ~ - j 3 ,
, AVL' ' 7H W ~ee
v
Q O N ~ .r T..~.
~
IO TH ~ITI-
o a 0 - d -
Th- cr
' J
u A V E ~ 12 T H ' T F T H
,i~u..~.~ . 1 . ~ • . _ 4 ~
.1 3`-T'N Z`V `nl~ ~ «rr+ ~3
4/
~ ~