VE-7-92 A,B & C
tONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF VARIANCES FROM )
THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE STANDARD ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
FOR THREE DIFFERENT LOTS ) CONCLUSIONS,
FILE: VE-7-92 ) AND DECISION
APPLICANT: MILLIE RENNER )
COMPANION FILE(S): ZE-10-64 )
PARCEL NUMBERS: 45232.0206, 0208 )
AND .0210 ~
APPLICATION DESCRIPTION• The applicant proposes to build 1 duplex on each of 3
different 18,000 square foot lots, whereas, sections 14 616 310 of the Zornng Code of
Spokane County require a minimum 10,000 square feet for each residential unit per lot
The totai area needed for each duplex is 20,000 square feet Authority to consider such a
request exists pursuant to section 14 404 080 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County and
Spokane County Board of County Commfssioners resolution No 89 0708, as may be amended
PROJECT LOCATION: Central Spokane valley, south of and adjacent to 3rd Avenue
approximately 342 feet east of Evergreen Road, in the NW 1/4 of Section 23. Township
25N, Range 44 EWM, 14006, 14022 and 14120 E 3rd Avenue
OPPONENTS OF RECORD• NONE
PUBLIC HEARING AND DECISION After consideration of all available information on
file, exhibits submitted and testimony received during the course of the public hearing held
on April 29, 1992, the Zoning Adjustor rendered a written decision on May 5, 1992 to
APPROVE the appiication as set forth in the file documents and as conditioned below
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1 The proposal is described above and detailed in documents contained m the file
2 In compliance with RCW 36 70 450, the Planning Department determined that
this proposal is generalty consistent, as conditioned, with the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan
3 The site is zoned UR 3 5, which allows the proposed use upon approvai of this
application A large parcel of B-3- zoning exists north and northwest of these three lots
4 The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include dupiexes, single family
and commercial/business activi#ies, all o# which are compatible with the proposal
5 The proposal is exempt from the provisions of the Washington State
Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43 21C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 (6) (b)
6 No adverse testimony or written comments were recewed regarding the proposal
7 Histoncally the following is true
~
CASE NO VE-7-92 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING AQIUSTOR PAGE 2
a In 1954 the Zornng was Agricultural and the land was platted into its
present lot size configurations At that time the Agricultural Zone allowed
duplexes on lots at least 7800 square feet with 70 feet of frontage
b In 1964 the land was rezoned (ZE-10-64) to Agricultural Suburban from
Agricultural At the time of the zone reclassification, the Agricultural
Suburban zone allowed duplexes on 7800 square foot lots with 70 feet of
frontage
c At the time the crossover from the Zoning Ordinance to the Zoning Code
occurred, the Agricultural Suburban zoning changed to Urban Residential-
3 5 At that particular point in time, the Agricultural Suburban Zone
required a duplex to have 11,000 square feet and 90 feet of frontage
d Several duplexes have been constructed on the area as follows
i 14016 and 14018 east 3rd Avenue is a duplex constructed on a lot
approximately 17,900 square feet in size,
11 14201 and 14203 east 3rd Avenue is a duplex constructed on a parcel
of land approximately 14,000 square feet in size, and
111 14204 and 14206 east 3rd Avenue is a duplex constructed on a parcel
of land approximately 13,100 square feet in size
e The above duplexes were constructed lawfully and in compliance with
required setbacks and on lots which exceeded the minimum lot size standard
at the time The present lot proposals involve lots which are approximately
18,000 square feet in size The only single family dwelling unit on the
street is owned by the applicant and occupies two parcels
f The lots are somewhat disadvantaged from the standpoint that they are in
close proximity to a B-3 zoning and are aimost immediately south of the
former Milwaukee railroad right of way, which right of way is siated to
become a major east-west artenal As a result, it may be difficult to
construct and mainfain single family ownership housing, whereas, the
concept of dupiex rental housing may serve to affect a transition from the
more intensive uses to the north to the lesser intensive uses to the south
8 The appiicant has been made aware of the recommendations of various County
agenaes reviewing this project and has indicated those recommendations are acceptable
9 The proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning
Adjustor of Spokane County have been met
10 The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as necessary and
appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public interest and general
weifare
Rp-VE-7-92 Decision
fA
~
CASE NO VE-7-92 SPOKAIVE COUMYZONING AQ1lJSTOR PAGE 3
11 Various performance standar+ds and critena are adddionally needed to make the
use compatible with other permitted actrvities in the same vicmity and zone and to ensure
against imposing excessrye demands upon public utilities, and these shall be addressed as
conditions of approval
12 With the conditions of approvai set forth below, the variance will a) not
constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with limitations on other properties in
the vicinity and similar zone, b) ensure that the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code is
achieved with regard to location, site design, appearance, landscaping, etc, and c) protect
the environment, public mterest and generai welfare
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES
the proposal as generally set forth in the file documents, subject to compliance with the
following
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. GENERAL
1 The foilowing oonditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in
interest and shall run with the land
2 Failure to comply with any of the oonditions of approval contamed in this
decision, except as may be relieved by the Zoning AdJustor, shall constitute a violation of the
Zoning Code for Spokane County and be subject to such enforcement as is appropnate
3 The Zoning Adjustor may administratively make minor adjustments to site pians
or the conditions of approval as may be judged by the Zoning Adjustor to be within the
context of the originai decision
il PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 These parcels shall not be further subd.ivided unless consistent wlth RCW 58 17,
the vanous county subd.ivision regulations and the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan for
the area
2 The applicant shall develop subject property generaliy in accordance within the
concept presented to the Hearing Body Vanations, when approved by the Planning
Director/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to buiiding location,
landscape pians and general ailowable uses of the permitted zone Ali vanations must
conform to regulations set forth in the Zoning Code for Spokane County, and the onginal
intent of the development plans shall be maintained
Rp-VE-7-92 Decision
CASE NO VE-7-92 SPOKANE COUMY ZONING NDJUSTOR PAGE 4
111. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS
1 The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Buildings is required
2 Each dwelling shall be double plumbed for connection to a future area-wide
oollection system
IV. DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1 Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer disposai systems is hereby authorized This authorization is oonditioned on
compiiance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by
the Health District
2 The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW
36 94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the
signmg of a protest petition agamst the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant
to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the Owner(s) property PROVIDED, this condition
shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the
property as a resuit of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID
by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36 94
3 Any water service for this project shall be provided in ac:cordance with the
Coordinated Water System Pian for Spokane County, as amended
4 Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-wide
collection systems
V HEALTH DISTRICT
1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities,
Spokane County
2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County
3 Water service shall be by a new/an existing public water supply when approved
by the Regionai Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health
4 Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health
officer, the use of indryiduai on-site sewage disposal system(s) may be authorized
5 Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited
Rp-VE-7-92 Decision
:
CASE NO VE-7-92 SPOKANE COIJNTYZOVING AQlUSTOR PAGE 5
6 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities,
Spokane County
7 Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited
VI DIVISION OF EMGIIdEERING AND ROADS
1 An approach permit shall be obtained from the County Engineermg Department
pnor to the oonstruction of any new driveway approaches This shall be done prior to the
release of a buiiding permit, change of use permit or certificate of occupancy
2 Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No 6 which
specifies the following
The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree fo authorize the County to place their
name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the
petition method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s)
property, and further not to object, by the signing of a bailot, the formation of a RID by the
resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s)
property If an RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in
Chapter 36 88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree
(a) that the improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is
feasible,
(b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property
included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds
the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and
(c) that the property within the proposed RI D is sufficiently developed
Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized
under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the
improvements calied for in conjunctbn with the formation of the RID by either petition or
resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW
This requirement applies to 3rd Avenue, from which the subject parcel takes access
NOTICE PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE
COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE
LAPSE OF THE TEN (14)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABILITY
FOR DCPENSES AND INCQNVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPUCANT IF THE PROJECT
APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL
Rp-VE-7-92 Decision
CASE NO. VE-7-92 SPOKMIE COUNTYZONING AQIUSTOR PAGE 6
(c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed
Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized
under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the
improvements called for in oonjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition or
resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW
This requirement applies to 3rd Avenue, from which the subject parcel takes aocess
NOTICE PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE
COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS MAY BE RELEASED PRIOR TD THE
LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD HOWEVER, THE COUNTY HAS NO LIABIUTY
FOR DCPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPUCANT IF THE PRO,JECT
APPROVAL IS OVERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL
DATED this P)day of May, 1992
.
J~
THO S G HER, AICP
Zoning djustor
Spoka Coun , Washington
FILED
1 ) Applicani (Certified/Return Receipt Mail)
2) Opponents of Reoord
3) Spokane DNision of Engineering and Roads
4) Spokane County Health District
5) Spokane County Division of Utilities
6) Spokane County Department of Buildmgs
7) Spokane County Fire Protection District No 1
8) Planning Department Cross-reference File and/or Electronic File
NOTE ONLY THE APPUCANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN
TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING APPEAL MUST BE
ACCOMPANIED BY A$120 00 FEE APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY
PIANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET,
SPOKANE, WA 99260 (Section 14 412 042 of the Zoning Code for Spokane County)
Rp-VE-7-92 Decision
~
OF"FI!..F O►= THE CUUhI"f Y k IuG 1 hIEER
'S)POk AlNiE C;fJUNTYr WAS!-IIIJGr!]N
Apri1 -3v 1 39.:..
FfJ.- 1:1'Oh AldE CCL1Nl"y PLF,NhdTrlG DEI'ARTMENT (lltr r-ent Flanninci
1`5t ij {Ti ..L I 1 -1 ..7 t 1- L.~ IJ c- Ir )
FRoMo SP0F f`iNL COUNFY ENC TNIE- E r
`_-j U B J - v I:. At'' qet''
reo Varx.ances
The L.~~-Ltrit/ Enqinzerina Dep~.~r-ti~nent has reviewe-d tr~p- ~above referenced
app1 x c.--►►, xonn 1"he fol. l.owa.ng comments are -Jffered fi-_~r inc 1Lcsic-n in
tl-iE Findzncas and Order as "Gondztions ofi ARprc-val" shoulc( the
reqLtest be approvedo
E1D The word "apPlicant shail .7.nclftde thz ~:.-wn~r or ownzrs -=-f the
proper-tyg his heirsy assiqns and successorso
,
. '
E66 THE APPL_ I CANT SHOLJLD BE ADt1I SED THAT Ahl AF'PRDACH PERhI I T MUST
BE UBTA1NED FROM THE COUhII Y lENr x NEER PR I t7R TO THE CONSTRUCTI QN
OF AhIY NEW TJRTVEWAY APRRDACHES. TFiIS MUS'I" E~E DONE FR70R TQ
TF-(E RELEASE OF A BU I LD IIVG PLRMI l-
E6'3 TF-IE APPL ICAhlT SHOULD BE ADV I SED TO CQNTACT TI-IE LOCAL F t RE
DTSTRICT TO ASSURE THAT FIRE DISTRICT ACCESS STANDARDS AND THE
PROV ISI 0NS (]F THE F I RE COnE ARE BET IVU MET n
E60 Appl.icant shall siqn Sp,_4ane CoLinty 1Votice to the PLcblic No-.o E
which specifies the f-DZlowlngn
TI-,e ►_iwneri s ) or si_RCCeSsor (s ) in interest apree to
autl-<oriZe tfie County to pZace their name(~ ) on a petition for
the f-Drmation c-f a koad Tmprovement D15tYl Ct { RTD } by the
petitic-n method pLtrsuant to Chapter 36a 88 RCWq wFrzch petitaon
inc lltdes ti-ie owner- (s) propertya Tf a RID is for-meJ by either
ti'I E' pet1 t? c-n ~---1' 1'' e5 c-litti+wtfl fil t=.` th1 ody aS or- cF V 1 ded f,' r' 1. I"1 ChaR te1'
f~`~a F"C~/1~
y the roWf1eY (a ) ca1`' SuC Cec'rscoY'' ) T uY' tfter clCal''e-C'o (1)
thc.~ t thr? 1f141pY-DUelilel-lt iTiY Cc-nstYUCt.1cf1'1 c..ontcarnpl .-_Atec1 Wlthln ttIe
prop~_ -,-_secl Rx D 1=; f Q a aLI., [e9 ) t IiaL- the ber ief L t~, to be der 1 ved
f rc-in the fc-r mat a. c-n c-ftI-oo PID 1_, y F h~ ~rcz~ perty i. nc 1!-idec~
F, hF' Y r' 1 f i y to_iQ p-theY W.l, t f I t f i E' ~--fTi ou(1 t cii aI"1 y, r--I l nt`v p-_i I'' t 1c1pc"l t 1of'i y
e h i'il.. l= ciS t antJ e fpeni k= c-f foY' f Tl aL1r-II i of LhL: rID. cZ 11d
th► ► t f r , e r _ ~ ICIPerty lo,1L l - F 1 1 i i t I-, e F, rc~ por> Flcl Ft TD 1~, zuf fic.ien t 7 y
d t= , t- L ~~e p F' tJ P1` +ri 1, Ld(? rJ , f► 1!' l1 cI y r I! e clwr7 e1'' (..:r ti CiY --lil c Cet">sciY(
t
f
r
F nge
s{-ia1 1 r~ eta i n t he r.a. gi-it,aE:, t~ ut hcora. 4ec! i_ti-itier RC W
ob)ect tc, C-in y a=, s es-i ~,r~ e.~ i it n t h~ e p~r ~~..p e rts~ ~s r~ es ~_t 1 t C-f the
1 mptr -DV C mE' t°1 tS Lc.~ l1ed fc-Y l. l i L-Df 1p1 I l t:. t1oI i t>' 1th r f`iEfor mat.}..---i~ .::,f
the RID bv ei i ho r pct~. til_-ri or reC:cI 1ut icin ffiE?t'~~~Id i_tnder Ghapter
iG . t3t3 IRCW.
{ his 1' er 1 it 1 t`' emoI i t .=.i(_1 p I 1. e-~ co . '~`.i 1"{"i ~ ~1 I'"~ i ~ f? -tYi r~ I. C~'~ tfi~ s i ~_t J ~ ~
p ...:4 lr i_ e 1 ta ~ r? a,=t C C e Ri
~
BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# 92 VF-7=92
Related File # ( A-B-C-)
Date to Review 04-29-92 Time 10:15 # 3
Date to AA & DR Time
Date Received 04-01-92
I
Project Name 3 DUPLEX LOTS 18,000 EA (CODE 20,000) No. Lots 3 No.Acres
-Section - Township - Range
d,p
SITE ADDRESS 14006-022-120- E 3RD AVENUE /E OF EVERGREEN PARCEL # 23542-0206
Applicant's Name GREGORY ARGER Phone # 926-5311
Address 300 N MULLAN-SPO, WA 99206 Work
Date Conditions mailed
Contact person GREGORY ARGER Phone #
FLOOD ZONE Yes No ✓
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name
Water Address
Sewer
School
Planning Contact Person Phone # 456-2205
Date Submitted Description Initials
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED
/ / FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NOT NEEDED
NOTICE TO PUBLIC NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
i\p%review.tor
- -
.
~
-
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
_ ~~j~;~ BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFF,ERSON ST.REEI=,.._
~~4:11 PHONE 456-2205 'K L
uvi.;:A~
h
QQ~j `
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 ~ MAR `1 1~7~7L
: SPOKANE COUNTY COURTMOUSE ~
.~z- . , .
a0O4gCC OO F SpOO GUaC ~OM~I`~~l ~OO I~Of~C~ QDdM~~OO G~ G°~NJ o(~~C~ G;1C~GaG°~~~IC~
DATE: April 29, 1992
TI M E: 10:15 a. m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department
2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Building
721 North Jefferson Street
Spokane. WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM 3
File: VE-7-92 A, B and C
VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM LOT SIZE STANDARDS:
LOCATION: Central Spokane valley, south of and adjacent to 3rd Avenue approximately
342 feet east of Evergreen Road, in the NW 1/4 of Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44
EWM; 14006, 14022 and 14120 E. 3rd Avenue.
PROPOSAL: Build 1 duplex on each of 3 ai#feren; 18,000 square'- foci lotL--;
sections 14.616.310. (1) (3) of the Zoning Code of Spokane County require a minimum
10,000 square feet for each residential unit per lot. The total area needed for each duplex is
20,000 square feet.
EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential 3.5 (UR-3.5)
SITE SIZE: Approximately 18,000 square feet for each of 3 lots
APPLICANT: Millie Renner
300 N. Mullan
Spokane WA 99206
NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10)
CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF SIGNING OF A DECISION REGARDING THE ABOVE. APPEAL MUST
BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON
STREET, SPOKANE, WA 99260 APPEAL FEE IS $120.00 (Section 14.412.042 of the Zoning Code of
Spokane County). VE-7-92/Agenda - 4-29-92
~
. ~
VE m ~ (AmC) '
7 9
, a . ~ .
l " `r' r[ 1
~
vA L ~.e~ d
V A, L L E Y W AY ~ ~
~ a ki • ` ~ 4 ; Ei lyi (A C
W~''~ ~
0 W ~ a
X~ . D
~
. < { : x . R} r-j
l-- 'y, ~ • > 4
Z' V~ x. 1• Z i~ RLy~ ` ~ .
J`' Lff
a ~ e . r~` t . t~ . , . I,, ~ ~A~
; N° 2312 i;' ~
~
, .
4 °
nd ' "w • ••r ' ~4 ~ i~
r_~ . ~ : _ • _ '
J _ ` Av E4
St M r
z ~
PC rochi
~ K7 $O~ 'r1 f!
~ T H A VE. ; ~
• . . rt~. . ~ ,
i1C
.i • ~ ~ CIvsvrc
Il'N
► ~ ' -
L ~ J
~ ..r . +n 0 t~ L7 6
g Ql3Lt , Q} [ (jTI1 T!+ ~
J . . . , ~ RcJ.Goscdd~~ , , . ~ . ~ y~ ~ ,
~ 7'~ rt .A V E ~ 7't H q °.s TT ~ ~~ry r_ . 7 T~ + ADA ~ V'
HC] 0
8 T H A V E cr
~ H U 0.
-~ys. t
~ - ,'4 ~.-a';yc. • . ~ 3. -
• z n ul 90
' ~ a r a
•~nd r
do
f0 'r►f ~ I]TH
0 tir ' p AM, - ;
- . ~ . . . Li. ~ ~ ~
J ~
12T "AvE 12 TH ' ~ FY rc
. • . _ ' . . • . ~.-~i+~~~[.~ . . . .1.. . . M1_ . . ......J.,.
137t-i A V E Z t)
6 13 rV-+ t 3 r
~
a 3 . T H I
~
,
13i H -rr NrH
- . _ . . . ~ ~ ~ (r
12;H AV w
; Ex►:c,REEK . . ~
3 ~ Ja. Hac.H
T V I X E N
_ " ' . .
~ .
;r
'.IJ uj • Q ~y ~ .1 Os
? ~ Q [L ~ T -A 1T TF4~.. . %
CC , g' ~ r`>
1 ,a
OD
< ~
< ue) i
~ A
L
~ m
A?U,,,
, . r
20 T H • ~'r ~T1'i CT. Mr .a.•&
0 'T h
21 . . . ~t
,
p ~ _ sr ~e ? >-,i .
~ _ . _ - - - • - ~ ` ~ _
l~~ ~II. 1~ 7 II A I~~I ■ ~
a
. .
. ..s`~~~• . - ,
, . •'~`k~t; " . -
. SPOK:ANE COLTN'TY PL4NNlNG DEPAR'TMENT
APPL,ICATTONS ]BEFORE THE ZnNING AD.TTISTOR
~ Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.: IIE " 7 -
Name of Applicant: Agen~ ~YjiI
StreetAddress: /v ~j
Phonc - Homc:
ZiP
ty: State: Code: 1 1"'C, Work: `l 26~ -57 .2* 1
Ci
~ Agent's No.:
Name of Propeity Owner(s): 1"I'i/ llr e -./rf'I?1'1 e1"
S treet Address:
~ - Zip ~ Phonc - Homc:
City: 4,' State: =~r* Code: I~71 Work:
. ,
,:tEQUESTED ACITON(S) (Circle appropriate action):
Variance(s) X~ Conditional Use Pezmit - Expansion of a
. Nonconforming Use
C
FOR STAFF USE ONLY '
Violadonl
Section Z-3 Township Range_qq Enforceme . t: Y*
•Lot and legal checked by: •Easement legal checked by: ~
•CWSSA Water urveyor): :•ULIDA emcnt n L ed: ~ N
•Eacisting zone: Citc Applicablc Section; ~ 6l~ .310 + y. VD~~'D
•A.rterial Road Pla-n esignation: 1va- ~ •Corrip. Plan dcsi' ti o r o w
-Fire District: 1- •Personnel doing preapp conf.•
•Othcrfprevious Planning Departmcnt actions involving this pro rty: Re-~"iv
•:i . V.
•Hearing Dafe: •Maint agreement checked by: ~
ABOUT TkiE PROPERTY
•Existing use of properry: ✓a ca~.•. vac a.r•.f / ~ic~'re ~t ~ •Describe proposed use of the propert~: Dvr~~ K C~~,( d-fric-et.,
•If a varianco application, state the (;ode standard and describc thc variance saught in compara.ble
termS: I Z; t
' .
•If a conditional use pemnit application, does proposal mect all standards? Y -~tAIR~
If not, has one or more variances becn requested? -Y N.
•What is thc sizc of the original parcel if this proposal is a recent or proposed diviSi .
.
•Street address of property (if known): i4IL!; ' z
•Legal descrigdon of property clude easeme~nt, if applicable):
Y ~Ce~t L_-,C/r'1
•Parcel No(s).:~.,-LJ) - '9' S' 3 2. 0 d Q~ Ozt)tS t7j n
•Sowrce of legal: C'~t 11 &~!r ' !.--,A
•Total amount of joining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/o,r agen •
•What incerest do you (applicant) hold in the property? _s ~
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS '
COUN'I'Y OF SPOKANE ) I SWEA.R, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORTZED AGENI' FOR TfIE PROPOSED SITB; (2) IF NOT THE OWIIER, WRITTEN PERMISSION
FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORLZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3)
ALL OF THE ABOVE -RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOC'[3MENI'S 00 MADE
TRUTHFUII.Y AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
h~ Signed:
~E P: HAddress: 1 '~<< „
~C~'.~ W3►s~ to~ Pho No e>s=:~I Datc: ~/~?S7`~z-
i
.
/
o lic in anj~ r the state of,GVashin on, residin at
My appointm nt expires:
`
~
l, S'AP4L pago 1 of 2
%k,~~~~~~ r
0 ' , • .
A. BURDEI~I OF PROOF
s ncccss.ary foc the applicant or his/hcr repreuntaavc to establish the rcasons why che
= REQUES'IED ACTION.should bc approvcd and to liurally put forth thc basic argumcnt in favor
~ of approving nce applicadon. Accardingly; you shauld have been given.a form for your requested
acdon (variancc, condidonal usc, ctc,) dcsigned to hclp you prescnt your casc in a way which '
'~:addresscs the critcria which thc Zoning Adjustor must consider. Plcasc fill the fonn out and return
ic,wich your a.pplicadon. .
B. STGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
1. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DrSTRTCT a Proposed mechod of water supply:
b) Proposcd mechod of sewage disposal: `~tl~(
A preliminary consultadon has been held to discuss the praposal. The applicant has been inForrned
of requitemenLs and s Lo 74t, ~ 5- F-~
(Signa(Date) (Sign-off Waived)
~ SPOKAN COUNTY ENGINEERING 'DEPART.MENT
_ A preliminary nsult s held t discuss the.proposal. The applicanc
has becn inf ed r
md s dards.
u
ignacurc) (Date) (Sign-off Waivcd)
3C~. POKANE COUNTY UTILTTIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Departmenc may waive
' if outside WWMA)
A preliminary consultarion has heen held to d.iscuss the proposal. The applicant has been inl'ornied
! of requiremy,n ts d ' . ,
; ` W~ 2 .2~ . ^ iL
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Plantiing?)
( J 'Inc applicant is required to discuss the propasal with ' to become informed of walcr sYstem
requiremcncs and standards. (Sce #4 helow)
;
The applicant is required to discuss the praposal with.
i to become. inCoRned of sewage disposai
requirements and standazds. (See #5 below) .
~
WATER PURVEYOR: _ i/e
a) Thc proposal i,5(1*i~ei_located within the boundary. of our future service arca.
b) Thc proposal is['gmwm located wichin the boundary;of our.current district.
c) Wc,are[aaa!mpj ablc to scrvc this sitc with adequate watcr.
d) ~ tisfact ry arrangcments4imelhave not becn made_to serve this proposal:
.2 ~ S Z--
~ (S ignature) (Dace) .
5. SEWERAGE PURVEYOR:
A prcliminary consultadon has be:en held to discuss the proposal. The applicanc has been inConned
oC requirements d s.
(S ignacure) (Date)
; .
pagc2of2
REv; ~r9►
• BYTRDEN of PR04F Form NAME: ~(C; 1/1C
VARIANCE , •
' . FLLE U MB ER YE ~ - ~
I~i -
Incroducrion to Lhis form: , .
A"va.ziancc" is chc mcans-by which an. adjustmcnt is madc in thc applica[ion of the spccific
nguladons of thc zoning classification for a, particular (ttie subjcct) piccc of propcrty. This
grnpcrry, bccause of spccial,circumstanccs applicablc co it, is dcprivcd of privilcgcs commonly
cnjoycd by ochcr propcrtics in chc vicinity. and in a similar zonc classification. This adjustmcnt
rcmcdics thc diffcrencc in privilcgcs. A vanancc shall not authorizc a usc othcnvisc prohibitcd in .
the zonc clbssificaaon in wh.ich the propcny is locaccd.. ~ .r
i . '
. ,
7'hc following qucsdons will hclp to detcrmine the outeome of your request. Your request
requires accurate and complcte responses. First circle either the "yes" or the "no" answcr(s).
following thc qucsrions bclow as thcy apply to your situation and thcn cxplain as nr,cdcd (in the
spacc providcd) to ma.lcc your uniquc sitvadon clcar. Ctrtain phrascs from the Spokanc . County
Zoning Codc-scedon-on-varianccs arc-includcd in thcsc qucstions: Thcy arc uttd 'mud: - '
If your rcqucsc is a ROAD FRONTAGE VARIANCE plcasc answcr only qucstions A,B,C ,
and E.
A. Will chis variancc pcruiic a usc which is otherwise prohibited. in this zane? Yes No
Explain: _A d /c,xi7A _ -0_ ~ 4e<,,
~ • . .
t -
,
B. Arc therc 5~e~Cia:.l-cizGVmsianccs LGots*iz shape, topogzaphy; locarion, access,
surroundings, ctc.) which apply bjcct propcrty and which may not
not apply co oLhcr propcrrics in chc vicinitv7 Yes No
I
Expla.in : ~l'U=, ~"l?/I ~ I S ;z-~
C~,~-,~~~-~
C. Is Lhc subjccc propcrty dclrivcd of pIIy.i~,gcs commanly cnioYSd b,y Qthcr
nromrdgs in the vicinitv and in a,s-imilaz zonc c1,assl fication? Yes No
Explain :
D. Will chis variancc bc harmful co the public wcLfarc or to othcr propcrtics in
thc vicinitv and asjrgi1~zonc classifcation? Ycs No
Expla.in:
E. Arc chcrc ochcr similar sicuad ,,~s in the viGIn1CY in a,5imi]as zonc clas.sificarion? cs No
Arc chcy pcrmitted uscs ? cs, No Arc they "noncunforming" uscs7 Yes cnor .
~ -
Ex p 1 ain ::.~Gj2 s /6c// G~ s%0~7
F. Cfluld che subject property tx put to a rcasonable and permiteed use by you or
anochcr penon withouc che rcquested variance? ' Yes I~Io.
Explain:
r
G. If chis requcsc is granccd, will thc subject property be morc environmentally sensirive,
encrgy conserving, or will it promotc the use of an historic property? ~ Yes No
Explain: ~ .
Ovcr pleasc ~ . Rcv: 5l22I90 Pagc 1 .
Fi. Tf chis variancc is gxantcd, will thc broadcr public nccd or intcrest be scrvcd? Ycs No I
. . . I
Explain:
~
~I. Will this variancc bc inconsistcnt with thc purposc of thc zoning which applics
to thc subject prvpcrty? Yes No
Explain: . . .
J. Will approval of this variancc grant to chc subjcct propcrty the privileges of a diffcrcnc
zonc classificadon (in ochcr words would this bc a"dc facto" zonc changc)? Ycs No
Explain: K. Will this variance bc inconsistcnt with the gencral purposc and intent of thc
Comprehcnsivc Plan? - Ye ?~'o
Expla.in . . ~ •
L. Is this variance rcquircd for a reasonablc economic rcturn from thc Subject propcrty
or is chc cxiscing structurc too small? ~ Ycs Co~
--J
Explain:
rv1 Did thc nracrical ciiffcultv which causcd you to apply for this variancc cxist
beforc you owncd thc subjcct propcrty? Ycs Ivo
. , .
Explain: .
s' .
~
If approvcd, wouId this variancc affcct land usc density rcgUlations which cxist ~
co prorcct thc Rarhdrum/Spokanc,Aquifer? Ycs No
;
Expla.in: . ,-x . ; .
. . , . ;
-hc following spacc is for furthcr cxplariatian. Your applicadon will gct bcitcr consideraaon if
fha(, how, and why you proposc your applicarion is clcar. Attach an addiaonal pagc(s) if nccdcd.
' ' .
.
. , _ . • r, _r ' • . .z ,
. . . . : • •
. , , . . .
. •
- . ; . . . ~ 4
• ' . • . . ' . Y . . . •
~ .
)u are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of
s application (we have the equipment to display video tapes). No such additional material
-equired and in an~ case it must be BRTEF and descriptive of issues which need to be
isidere'd in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure
~e followed feel free.to contact the Spokane County Planning JJepartmenl (456-2205).
~ ,
Pag'c
. . 4 F. . • ,i~
• . • ;:~~~~f • . ' , L ' .
SPflK:A.NE C4UN'I'Y PAG DEPARTMENT
ArtLICATIQNS BFFO.~E:THF, ZONYNT ADJY1ST R -
Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.:'
Name of Applicant: AgenG
StreetAddress: /V ~ /~~1 c~( //9/V
.
~ ~oP ~hone - Home:
~ ` S 1
City: c in F- State: Cde: ~ o k 1
~ . Agent's 'No.:
,
Name of Propeity*Owner(s): E'- : Mr Il .,r) e r-
-7 r tcf ' S treet Address: 3 .
Zip ~ Phone - Homc: L
City:~ ~p0 t11;'"~ ~ S tate: U-It Code: ~ Z< & Work: 7-7G=
, .
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action): rv-2ance(s~ ~C ~ Conditional Us'e Pem~it Expansion of a
~
Nonconforn-i.ng Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Violation/
Section Z-3 Township Range_Y9 Enforcement: Y*
•Lot and legal checked by: .,•Easement legal checked by: ~A
•CWSSA Water (pw,r,v,eyor). r~ .:•ULID Agre ement needed: ~ N.
•Existin zone: Cite A licable Section;
•Arteria.~Road PI pP •Com . PIan desitio lesignatLon: p •Fire District: •Personnel doing P. reaPP conf. • .
•Otherfprev.ious Planning Depardment actions involving this pro rty: /Pe~.nQ✓ g&") v
, ' , • 's~.%s
•Hearing Dafe: •Maint agreement checked by:
ABOUT THE PROPERTY •Existing use of property: ✓a ca.w~ vaC~►~.~/~~ c~'r14~hr~_ . ~
•Describe ProPosed use of the Pr oPe : D()h[eX~,r d-e
. .
•If a variance application, state the . ode standard-'and describe thi variance sought in comparable
terms:
•If a condiaonal use germit. application, daes proposal meet all standards? YN. If not, has one or more variances been requested? -Y N.
•What is the size of the original parcel if this proposal is a recent or proposed divisl .
~,L//~>
•Street address of property (if known): _4}00h - /41
•Legal description of pro ,erty ' clude easem nt, if applicable):
~
1 4- ~ ~t°~l~'~"'
~
•Parcel No(s).: . . . ~ .
•Source of legal:
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and!o~r agen
•What interest do you (apPlicant) hold in the property?
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S S . . ' COUNTY OF SPOK:A.NE I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PER,SZJRY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORTZED AGEIVT FOR THE PROP05ED SIZ'E; (2) IF NOT THE OV+fNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION
FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACI'IONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHF~D: AND (3)
ALL OF THE ABOVE-RESFONSES, AND THOSE ON SLTPPORTING ~ S MA.DE
TRUTHFCTLLY AND TO THE BEST 4F MY KNOWLEDGE. i
Signed: ~
Address: 117~
O,, P'4~~ ASHy~~'F Pho No Date:
.
O
ilO lic in r the state ofWashington, residing at
' . My appoinmaent expu~es:
.
•tA~9ES'APa.~~'~~~i , .
~p • . . . . • page 1 of 2
~%~s y V~
~ .
. ' 1
. - • • ~
_ • ~ . '
. . ~ , .
~ A. BURDEN OF PROOF *s ncccssary fcx the applicant or hisJher represcncative to establish the reasons why the
; REQLTESTED AG'TION.should bc approvcd and to litcr,ally put forch the basic argumcnt in favor
` of approvi~ng thc application. Accorduigl}r; you should hiave been given.a.form for your requested
, acuon (variancc, corxUnonal usc, ctc.) dcsigncd to help you prescnt your casc ui a way which
~addresses thc critcria which tho Zoning Adjustor must'consider. Pleasc fill the form out and return
it _wich your applicadon. • . .
. ~BY COtJNTY DEPARTMENTS AND O'rHER AGENC7ES
7 1. SPOKANE CUUNTX HEALTH DISTRXCT . a Proposed meth od of water su p pl y: U--
b) Proposed mechod of sewage d isposal: s-y4i c-
A preliminaryconsulcation has been held to d.iscuss the proposal. "ne applicant has been infonned
of requitements and stan
" (Dat;e) (Sign-off Wa.ived)
(Signat~
2. SPOKAN COtJNTY ENGII~IEERII~G 'DEPART.MENT . A preliminar~y nsult held t discuss the. proposal. The applicanc
has been inf ed ueme and s dards.. , .
' i gnature) (Date), (Sign-off Waived)
3. POKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waivz
. . if outside WWMA)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The appl'icant has been infornied
of requirements: and standards. _ . _ . . ,
4
.I . .
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Plarzriing?)
f The applicant is required to discuss the proposal wich , to beconze informea of water system
! rcquiremcnts and standards. (See #4 below) : , . .
,
` . . . - . : 4
1
Thc applicant is requu~ed to discuss thc proposal~with,
~ to becomeAnformed of sewage disposoi
requirements and standards. (See #S below) . .
, WATER PURVEYOR• . ~l~t AAL ~ t
a} Thc proposal j;;[lttni,located within the- boundary. of our future service area.
b) Thc propos.al i;~ located within the t~oundary;of our-current district.
c) Wc arela=MM ablc to scrve this sitc with adequate water.
d) tisfac ry arrangcments-~ ave nQt becn made.co serve this proposal:
7
(S ignature) (Date) „ .
5. SEWERAGE PtJRVE'YOR: ~.v~ .
A preliminary consultation has bf:en held to discuss, the pro posal. fihe applicanc has been infonned
of requiremencs and standards. . .
(Signature) (Date) .
.
page 2 of 2 Z~: ~PP •
R.Ev: 1191
T., V
! ~ r ~
N U M 8 E R
R ~
_ ~ z EIPT ~
~
4 oATF Z
4 ~i'~S4
_ RECEIVED FROA b
. Add r s 2 ~ Zu5
~
7Z / ~.•I DO RS
• FOR
~
~
s
~ ACCOUNT I HOW PAID
~
BEGINNING I I ~CASH I I
~ BAIANCE
o An1nUNT /1 v~ CHECK, y!
'c PRID ~(l I U-i
~ M~oE sr+usA gAtANCE MONEY y I
w.wnme +9e9 UUE ` I I ORDfR $Y , ~
_ Mi rnrv'O"Ho
h'EO t eu 5l#lE2 h t 0 2 5,,lf t O: i 2 5 5 t Z 0 5 2E: i--
,
io9
►Luc Uftfuiq-m 'ww4ojs y ~ us►I -g •oa 'MY7A\I i119lJAS S= '3
+Uto A&IiM wV+Ods '
9Sli'lueg Pu 299
,
''~'ll°Q ~ ~ ~ ,.~i~'' -t- ~ ~ ~ ~ ; .
,
le
9 Z66 vM, lauv~ods
osac~ss~c-st 61 0609-6Z6 titi~~~llnti I szFzr 3;~ LL •
/ uo;suyoc •7 V)!,%L Jo •F auiW
sluug; sala)aa
~ C0 I a.irs;ual, :1 ya
'7
.
~i.
~ ~
. ~
~ ~ .
~ . ~
~ ~ z a
r
~ r. Y ~ cp ~J
, LL-EY
t o
T l~Jt ~t~~N ~ ~ ~ ~ ■
} f ,
u~ r Y L~
• ~A~.~ YI ' cttVC ~ y ~
. >
; ~ No~ 2312 ; ►
O ~ - ~ ~`Y " 2 ~ 1
. ~ ~ AN 00t M .
~01) 1 +
..-r+r'~-
jj, \l ' Ter+~' C' 7 tX
4 T x ' a! Ctosurc
O P bT~
4, purt d osed~t~~,, rt . 7TN
7-r 055, r,• ko S-
~ q .
. 7 -t M
. • . ~
7 T M AV E ~ •rY• ~ , v-t
~
cn <
~ ~ ► O
T O " ? IF Z t{
~
o ' l2 TH r3 r*+
~
' • y , ' t~ • t ~C N'~
►2T ZjAvE Z' ` ~ TE
~-r•~ .y,~~
N ,
TN
~ _ 1X N
] ~ ~ ¢ ~EEtt •''-;:r. <I
Q O R. MtC,N ~•.~A.. !.F• ; -
P• Qf-*
T v~ a;< ~ ~i cn o~
a m
cwo
Z 'J w t 9~` 4' f•
M .
W/CI( a . ~4 • ~ t ~J ~CT
E AVE
CID :
p pt N a
" .
sr - ro
\ ~