Loading...
VE-25-89 ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF FLANKING YARD ) SETBACK VARIANCE ) FINDINGS OF FACT, LEROY KUNZ [VE-25-89] ) CONCLUSIONS, ) DECISION AND ORDER PARCEL NUMBER: 27543-1303 APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to locate a garage with an appmximately 36-foot setback from the flanking street centerline of the roadway right-of-way, whereas Section 4.04A.090 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 45-foot setbacck from the flanking stroet centerluie of the roadway right of-way. Authority to consider such a request exists pursuant to Section 4.25 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. PROJECT LOCATION: Genemlly located approximately 1/4 mile east of Pines Road and at the SW corner of Lenora Drive and Vercler Street in the SW 1/4 of Sectian 27, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM. PARTIES OF RECORD: None PUBLIC HEARING: After examining all available iaformation on file with the application and visiting the subject property and surnounding area, the Zoning Adjustar conductod a public hearing on June 21, 1989 and rendered a written decision on July 7, 1989 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposal is described above. 2. The adopted Spokane County Futune Land Use Plan designates the ama of the proposal as Urban. The proposal uses are generally consistent with this category. 3. The site is zoned R-1, which allows the proposed use upon approval of tlus applicaaon. 4. The existing land uses in the ana of the proposal are predominandy smgle-family residences and vacant land, both of which ame compatible with the proposal. S The proposal is exempt from the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW pursuant to WAC 197-11-800(6)(b) r Q 7 1989 ~ w MMy ' _ • CASE N4. VE-25-89 SPOKANE COUA]TY ZONIlVG A►DNSTOR PAGE 2 6. The appucant has been made aware of the reconunendations of vanous countylstate agencies reviewnng this project and has indicated he can comply with those recommendations 7. No one appeared to oppose the progasal. No written comments adverse to the proposal have been received. 8. The proper legal requirements far advertising of the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met 9. The applicant present,ed numerous examples of other homes and garages which have less than the forty-five (45)-foot setback in this sanae area and zone. 10. The apphcant indicated the proposed oonstruction will not intrude into the clear view tnangle area which has been established for traff'ic safety. 11. The applicant agreed that no other visual obstructions, e.g., fencing or landscaping, would be placed in the front yard along the flanking street. DECISION AND ORDER From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the proposal, subject to compliance wnth the following. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. GENERAL The following conditions shall apply to the applicant, owner and successors in interest and shall run with the land. H. PLANAIING DEPARTMENT 1. The applicant develop the property in conformance with the site plan submitced to the file. 2. Only sce-through fencing be established along the front yard of the flanking sueet, Vercler Road. III. DEPARTMEN'1' OF BUILDING & SAFETY The nsuance of a bwilding pennit by the Departrnent of Building and Safety is required. VI. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT It is requu•ed that, prior to the release of a building pernut, the site plan be reviewed to assure that the clear view sight distance mangle will not be obstructed by the proposed swcture CASE NO. VE-25-89 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADNSTOR PAGE 3 NOTICE PENDING COMPLETION OF ALL CONDTTI4NS 4F APPROVAL WHICH NEED TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, PERMITS CAN BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE LAPSE OF THE TEN (10)-DAY APPEAL PERIOD HOWEVER, THE COUINTY HAS NO LLABILITY FOR EXPENSES AND INCONVENIENCE INCURRED BY THE APPLICANT IF THE PROJECT APPROVAL IS 4VERTURNED OR ALTERED UPON APPEAL. DATED this ?th day of July,1989. Do g as S. Adams ning Adjustor Spokane County, Washington FILED 1) Leroy Kunz, Apphcant (via CernfiedlReturn Receipi Mail),12622 East Lenora Dnve, Spokane, WA 99216 2) Planning Department Cr+oss-reference File and/or Electronic File 3)- - County En&eer's E)ff'ice 4) `-Spolt~ne C;ounty Health Distnct 5) Spokane County Ualities Department 6) Spokane County Department of Building 8z. Safety 7) Spokane County Fire Protection Dismct No. 8 NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPOrIENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL VVITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE ABOVE DATE OF SIGNING. APPEAL MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$lOQ.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE SPOKANE COU►NTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUII.DING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SP(3KANE, WA 99260 (Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordlnance). Revised 5-3-89:rp/fcu DFFTCE QF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOkANE CnUNTY WASHINvTON Jun e 13p 1981-9 TO: SPOKAIVE COUIVTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT. CCurrent Planninq Administratora FR(]M: SPOKAhIE COUNTY ENGINL-ER ~ W`& SUBJa VE 25-85 (kunz) re: Zonin4 We have reviewed the abave referenced variance application. It is recommended that prior to the release of a bui ldinq permit that the site plan be reviewed to assure that the c lear view siqFrt distance trianqle will nat be obstructed by the proposed structure. If the property alanq Vercler Raad is to be fenced, the fencing shall be constructed in such a manner so as to not obstruct siqht distance at the intersection of Vertler and Lenora Drive. OFF r CE 01- l"HE COUhIT 1' ENG T NEER SPt7k ANE COUNTY WASHINGTQN June 13 y 1989 TOo SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIhIG DEPARTMENTe CCurrent Planninq Administrator7 FR01"I: SPOk,APIE COUNTY EIVGIIVEER SUBJ: VE 25-89 (Kun.-) re: Zonin4 We have reviewed the above r-eferenced variance applicatione It is recommended tfiat prior to the release of a buildinq permit that the site plan be reviewed to assure that the clear view sight distance trianqle will not be obstrutted by the propnsed structure. Ifi the property along Vercler Road is to be fenced, the fencinq shall be constructed in such a manner s4 as to not obstruct siqht distance at the intersection o-nf Vercler and Lenora Driveo . t ~ J 3` 'A`t PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROAOWAY CENTRE BUIIDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PNONE 456-2205 SPOKANE. WASNiNGTON 99260 SPOKAN[ C01lNTY GOURT NOYSC 140TIICIB OlF SIPOKMZ COIIJfa~ ~ONIIfJQa ~JUSTOlR PUBII.IIC HZA1I8IIRTG DATE: June 21, 1989 TIME: 9:30 a.m. or ss soon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane Couaty Planning Department 2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Cenue Building North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane. WA 99260 AGENDA ITEM # Z Filg~ VE-25-89 VARIANCE FROM FLANgING YARD SETBACK REOUIREMENTS: L O C A T I O N: GeneraUy located appruaimately 1/4 mile east of Pines Road and at the S W corner of Lenora Drive and Vercler Street in the SW 1/4 of Section 27, Township 25N, - Renge 44EWM. P R O P O S A L: The applicant proposes to locate a garage with an approximate 36 foot setback from the tlanking street centerline of the roadway right-of-way, wbereas Section 4.04A.090 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 45 foot flanking street setback from the flanking street centerline of the roadway right-of-way. EXISTINC= Z011TINC=: R-1 CROSSOVER : Urban 3.5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban SITE SIZE: Approximately 10,335 square feet APPLICANT: Leroy Kunz 12622 E. Lenora Drive Spokane, WA 99216 ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS MAY BE HEARD FIRST, POSSIBLY CAUSING DII.AYS. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJEGT DETAII.S FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNIIVG DEPARTMF.NT FILES. APPEALS OF THE DECISION ON THE ABOVE LISTED CASE MAY ONLY BE FILED BY TI-E APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD ACCOMPANIED BY A$100 00 FEE. (Sections 4.25.090 and 4 25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.) - , ~ ~ t N pV ~ • 1 _ ~ i ' tN TM a ~ i ' ~ Gs^~~ ~LTAltSf . ~3~ Add ~ * ~o , t : 1 3 T ~ ~ N ~ G Ci . ' p~~ a ~4t++ e~ P • ~ ~ TM . r J► tJ~'~ N TM . . ~ . ~ ' • ~ ` . 1 tN - ~ ~ ~ ~ ► ~y s s . ~ . ~ ~ 32 ` ~36 •~T r3e ~ W ~ • • ► ~ .r • ~ ~ . 12g s ~ `T 12'~ ~ IZl ' 119 . to a 1 g ~`ia,~ ~ - ~ ~ . • 4 i ,,,1 ~ 41:1000 ~ ~ ' r ~ - - , AO TN /~►y~ ~ _ ~ r - ~ --11 ' A--0--t04::4 ~ V ~ tv ~ . SFOKANS COUNTY PLANNING DSP • . : 0 '~~2'~^~ Certificate of Facrmpuan No.. aPPlication No. Name of Applicant: ca~ Y CN Stroet AddressJ F'hoao . Home: ZIp iim., 2 Z City: Alt; 6/0 Stste: LQ.7 coda; work: . Agents No. Nama of Propcrty OvrnaKs): Streat Address: zip Phoiu - Hoaie: Cicy: State: Code: Work: REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circla spproprisu sctioa): ~ Variancot~s Coaditional Usa Potasit Noaconionaiag Lot/Use VYaivar oi Violatioa Temporary Uso/Structura Otbar: FO S7'am L1~E ONLY ~ ;MD • ORDINANC.B ~ ~la~a. Cite Reguletions Sactlon(s): ~ •~Ar oPropart iolation/ Scctioa: ~~Towaship: Z~ RsnBa: ~ size:/s orcaiaaot: Y N Existing Zoaiag: e' k Com.p. Plao Desigaatioa: oi,- 6e.-L I.B+C3AL PS SA: Y N UTA: Y N ASA: Y~N F1R8 DIS'r. t ~ CHBC~~BD' SY: ~ ~ , Heariag Datc: Igagg Personnol Taklag ia Appllcation: I i E xiscing Use of FroPenY: ~(4ek$~~ l) T l~/''l~t < Descrlbe !~ended Proposel ia Terms of RBQUESTBD ACTTONS abovo: 4N 6V jv& cA orrom mc 3¢ ~ ~ ~ ' l ~.•~Ei~ ' s ~ S~rc~~' dr~s4 o Property: ~ as &Ju trJR Le al oscsiptloa f Pro rty (tacluda e4s eatif applicablo): ~ ~ ~e6ti :E5* . ~E.~ Parce No s Sourca of Legal: , t . Total aaiount of sdjoining laad controlled by thia ownerisQonsor: What iaterest do you hold in the property? czac231gE,r . Please list previous Planning Department tctions iovolviag tbis property:.96-e t~ 7q' 70 1nv tlq . t SWEAR. UNDER PBNAI.'1"Y OF PEtiJLJRYo THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNB1i OF RECORD OR AUTHORLZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSBD SPl'E; (L) IIr NOrI' THS OWNER, WRiTIEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZINO MY AC1'IONS ON HISAM BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL OP THE ASOVE RBSPONSBS AND► THOSE ON SUPPORTINC3 DOCtJMENTS ARE MADE TR Y AND TO 8 OF KN0INLJME. Sigaed: kL1 Addtess:J5 ~ a E kv-v% o A A ~ R SPogiAwe 99p M • ~ i MOiie. •,O.• D te:J;w / ~ . NM.4R Y .SFAL:. Notar,X: Dste: Page_1 vf-R (Ovar) Revised 3-4-88 ~ A. BURDEN OF PR()~F It is oecessary for tbe appltcaat or hts/bcr representative to establisb the reasons way the REQUBSTSD ACTTON sbould bo approved aad to litarally put forth the basic casa. Accordingly, you should hava beaa glven a form for your requasted action (variance, condltiooal use, etc.) designed tv help you preseat your casa ia e way whicb sddnsses the crltarl4 wbicb tbo Zooiug Adjustor ioust coASider. Please fill tbe form out aad retum it wlth your appticattoa. If you dtd aot get a form, ask the Planoiog Departiuent personnel for advice. on bow to proceed. 8. SIGN.OFF BY CO[1NI'PY DEPARTMENT4 =ER A~ENCI Q , 1. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRIt`T . a) Proposed mathod of water supply: b) Proposed mathod of sewage disposal: A preliminary eoasultatioA has beea held to discuss C proposal. Tha applicant bas been infor:ned of tequiremeats stsndards. , (Sigaatura) ( a e) ` ($iga-off e Waived) 445~ 2. [`Ot1NTY ENCINEERIN(: DEP RTM .NT A pnliminary coasultatioa has beeo beld to discuss tha proposal. Tha applicant bas be informed ir mants and standards. s ~ e/- ~I ' figa ura) (Date) (Sign•off waived) ` OrwOJINTY UTIL.ITIES DEPARTMENT (Wgiya jt OutsidC WMAS ) Ew-r A pnlimtoiry coasultatioa has bmu hald to discuss the proposal. The licaat tias an iaformed of rcquinmeats ead steadards. (Sigaatu (Deta) (Siga-off Waived) The Pp cs~u is nquind to discuss the proposal witb ~ to becomo Informed of water system requirenieats aad staadards. a applic8nt is ujnd to discuss the pr+oposal wI ~ to becoaia infor:oed of ts&age disposal raquinwents a standarda. OAATER PLIRVEYORs (Weive if ou aide CWSSAI e) Tbe proposal oceted wlthln the boundary of our future servica area. b) Tha propossl locatod witbin tba boundary of our curroat district. c) We AMi able to serva thfs site wlth adequate wstcr. d) Satjsfsctory arraagaments bElhave not betA wade to serve thts prop9 1, l tsj8natu J/ (Date) (Sign-of Waived) io, SEWERA GF P 1RVFY0 o (It other tban Spokaae County) A prcliminary consultation has been be-ld to discuss the ptoposal. The applYcaat has been iofornaad of raquirements aad stendards. (Sigaature) (Date) (Siga•off Weived) Paga 2 of 4 ~ ~ APPLICANT'S FORM NAME. FiLE: ~ I. YARIANCES ' A. Wi 11 the vari ance authori xe a use otherwl se prohi bi ted i n thi s zone? Yes _ ; No Conment: LN - ~ ~ ~ ~2 OL C44.0-4& ~ 47 B. Wi 11 specl al ci rcumstances a 1 f cabl e to the ro ert (such a s si ze, shape, topography, surroun ngs when Gombine w t t e standards of the Zoning Ordinance, create practical difflculties for use of the property and/or deQrive the property of rights and privileges common to other prope i es i n the vi ci n1 ty and simi 1 i ar zone cl assi fi cation? Yes ; No ; Conmnt: • C. Wi 11 the granti ng of the vari ance be materi al ly detrimental to the publ i c wel fare or i njurious to pro erty or improvements i n:he, vi ci ni ty and zone? Yes ; No ; Coaments : (c c t-I.A I-Asi2 &CAW%L &AAA ' • (cc 'tT~' m 7 ~w 5 ~ D, Does stri ct appl i cati on of the zoni ng standard create an unreasonabl e burden in 1 ight of purpose to be served by the standard? , Yes JC ; No ; Comment: L)@c.t) g~ rr~ a~ i.. ~ p r d~14~ tljgUgLj~ r2nP ~t A,v v,Qvp r-r,rt.,cJ r3p6f' . I 4J2 r4.o fivv T' Dc9o Q E. Woul d rel axati an of the zoni ng standard make a more envi rofnental ly sensi ti ve or energy-conservi ng project or encourage conti nu.:d ~ n use of an historic property? Yes ; No ; Comnent: i F. Wi11 a broader, public need or interest be served by granting verse denying the variance? Yes ; No 4( ; Comnent: G. Is the case for a variance supported by other like or similar si tuati ons i n the vi ci ni ty and i n simi 1 ar zones? Yes jC ; No ; Conment: (continued on reverse side) H. Wi 11 granti ng the vari ance adversely affect the overal l zoni ng design, plan or concept for either the irtmediate area or the entire County? Yes ; No Comment: 1. Is the ease for a variance substantially based upon a lack of reasonable economic return or a claim that the existing structure is too sma11? yes ; No Comment: , : J. Wi11 granting the variance be inconsistent wlth the general purpose and intent of the Comprehenstve P1an? Yes ; No Comment: , K. Did the practical difficulty which gives rise to the variance request exist before the-property was acquired by the present owner? Yes ; No _~C ; Cannent: ....1wLe ~ L~e iDA rf r U iA g,'~IC„~) :A,,.. ~ _ t r L. Will the granttng of the variance result in defacto zone reclassifica- t1 on; that i s, the establ i shi ng of nearly a11 the pri vi 1 eges common to a different zone classification? Yes ; No Comnent: M. Does the requested variance result in the circumveption of density regulations designed to protect the Aqulfer? Yes ; No Comment: , . M 0046=/Arch. 0002z 2 2~ M z 4#11*01V ri Z5 26 < K 2/~ 4 ~SH~~ OME o ,v ~NUEO ON m J ~ ~ I Z~ ~ o CO W 800NE ~ y T ~ CATw-~ ' I~ H ~ ~ ~ > 0 j O Sppl A~ Q oE►w / M~+p" ` gi2pADWAY J AV. p N~,e i 1 K Av. vA► M Fl A11(i AV. , lV 2 NpC ~1 ~ NtX~ NIX N ~ . . O C~ Y NI%OM. ('1 ~'l t7~ c> 1lP/ER ~ h ~ z•~ ~ R W z V11.t~ C, ~ .i at~ mVtD~SPRAG E' A` ` rd 'R,. . RIVEA- C3 'f R 2n0 = ~ ~ rt !LM'A LXf ~ C9 Qfh ~w ~ jtd ~w ~ `t M J 2 ---~u' L ° T~` w s 0 0 ~ 2T xT s` ~ ~ ; M►Y. , 91% 9M . ~0 1h ~ LL ItM TIlt It ~ 9tM .i~ ~ J 1~~M t ~Zth A~. G M M f)U3th w la~' 10 M 4r N ~ t~ 0 --d w $ N~b - 1~~* ~ 1 NA' ~S } W t n~~ 1 N, ~a'~ ~ 0 1411A p~ r• ~ fh a ~ 1! " M s C5i ~ ~ W~ ~!SO T, y $4 Tes f~4v ~ 49 i~ 20 zo~ s~ 14p. 40* Ysioes °R• ~ 71 I,b $Ce ser d 1k Ch y 9M j'* Z, y 2p ~ F RO a Z_~t 1 .i ~t OLr ' Yt ' C'? I o ~'i +~~If N rd lts~ 2nA rah9~F L M ~ 2 O !4~* 1~ ~ Q " ~tM r ~ ~ t y O ~ 4~ Y5~* W Ik ~?q . X * .III► 2 111 ~ ~ t611~ 0 Ik p W s ^d 3~R. Av' 0 ~ ~ ~,~r o• z 0 ~ 30Q0 ,e 31% LOpc •,r !5 yoa se'" , S~"'otr' 4► lk TERR ♦ E AY. 3 41~« v .o,* Y ' F 401* ~ ' P v~ ~ ~ ,>n~-~~~ • ~ i,t~Ot Sa~~n t St ~ ~ ~be&►9 tor sp~~ ~ " towf► systert►• SP~a9ije d~ SOLO tert'. fnto ics ~ W~t howver, at sveets maY not be ~^1 caM.Wcw US•"VVJ~~"'"f'xEnNes r~sour~s ot4e~ 28 97 . ~ ~~enoRA oR. C~,•~Q_ , _ y0 . • - Req~~ee~ 8u,,~,o~Hs ~ ~ S~Tgqt~e 1.~n~ ~f I ~ dF Y R~~µ7 OF wA~ c r26 kenoR4 DQ - - I • - • ~ - i, A►.k ST2ee-Ts pae cvRb,e,-:o Ano Pqveu ; I . N►1-~U~BW QSTASes ~ ~ ~ , $ e cv @ R 1 S l tt, , ~OT 3 Q OC lt 11 ~ ~ , . Sec 2~-aS-yy i yS►- ' ~ ~ Ve2~u~.c2 Run'S ~ ~ ~ ~ 36~ ' ~ ~ o n ,e Qj, a crL I d RoPaie~ ~~~-t~ ~ Q , ~ i A n~ ► S p nT ~9 HoaSG GAR~AtC pU S H STReeT, r~ , ~ • I ~ ~ I 70 i Pno PCs e t~l I SCT6aCK ~ n71- y7 S L ~ (ra SC ~4~C ~ ~ I►M F~ r'~ 1 - • - - - - - - - J ~ . ~ . - . ~I • - . . . . , . ~I I ry ?Y.•:: 1 ~'~':.Y.(v ti') ~/h' ~ ~ ; • I ~~t i;`.•1~ N • ~ • \,t:::: • :~J~ ':lL~ ~ •~~:v :~:Lti•:.: /}:~::f / , ; . . , . ' ~ • . • ~ • ,I ~ ' I \ . ~ 1 :te' :I ::Nw I . ' r;':.:: .~i; : • :•;T ' N . j~~~ . . . ~ . . . . . • ~r ~~.."-•-e~i% ' • FRONT ELFVATION S CAL E-'/.+" = 1 FT. . _.r_.___.__._:.._...._..___.-... . ; : . . . . • . . • . , . . .w.:.: . 12 , \ ROOF J • . • - i • ~ . - • • . ! • ~ . . ' , . , . . ~ . . ~ , . ~ : . 1 ~ , ~ I ~ . ~ ~ . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SIDE ELEVAT(ON SCALE- Y.s" = 7 FT. r . ' ~ , . , ~ J . J i I - ~ h • ~ . . ' C) I . ~ I 1 . . , .~,~ii~. .l:•~•'~,. , • ~ , . . . ' . ~i ,1.'•,'. ~I.;.''.''.'~: ~ ~ . . . . . , , . , ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ REAR ELEVATION SCALE-Y~"=1Fr, I ~ ~ . ~ ~ * , ~ ~ , M ~ , ~ , , r , ~ • , . ~ N X I K N ♦ Z D r O ~ 4m m a r ~ m ~ cZi . l o ~ I I r~-- ~ ~ , : O c_ x pf ~ : T I rn y •Q : N Z M. • c~ ; . ( m : y+ I i .n 3) . I ~ D I ~ T --1 m m N , N X N f Z p D o t m N 1 ~ . - • - ~ ~ . ~ 6'_ _t 6'-~ 6~~ ~ 6~~ ~t 6 ~_t 6"._j ~.16'~ ~.t 6" 6':I_t 6'~ ,16: 16_ 16-- -tG_ _t6~~ I LOCATION OF RAFTERS r OOUBI.E 2 x 10 HEAOER ' ~ . . ' . v v j IA ~ ~ - ~ ~ N N 1 N x x 1 N ' ~ i ` x x • ~ 7O CA : ~ - cn cn -4 163 c = c. N v, 16" - 40.6cm 8' - 243.8cm > ' . ~ 221/2" - 57.2 12'53/4" - 380.4 ~ • T ' • ~ 4'61/4" -137.8 16'3" - 495.3 ~ ~ ~ • s ' . • 7' 15/0 - 217.5 20' - 609.6 , _ . . . . FL00 R . ' ~ . . ' . 1. . . . , _ ~~.'i~ti~.~~►~~•\i..~f.'~.•~w~• .r ~ :1~ ~ Distance be±ween curb and floor is fiqured as 4• ' at door opening. Top of Curb r ?x 2xt GABLE ~ sTUO A. 16•• LI • ~ ~ 3l --~C---''~"~- I ~ . . . , , 26' l ' • DR A•lY% - • • ~ ~ r ~ ~i i • ~ ~ ' , . - F-`ooR -co FROy-r ~ - . p[Y 24' SCAIE FY. ~ - . t ; • , . , ~ • - , auta~a~ ~oN Foo~ `CREP~ . . l' ~ l 11~ . ~ f. • . t~ ` , ( ~D~ . • ~ ~ ~ 1'. y ~ c~j A~i p,G . , • ~ / ~01~~ S , f , 3 ' , ~ • Gp`.~GRE.T~' 3 ~ . 7j4'ti` ~ ' • ~ s`• - .9 ~ r• ~ I 2p . ~ V . • - SFOKANE COUN1'Y PLANNING DEPART'MENT APpLICATIQNS BI?PQRF'I'HE 20NLNQ AD]LS'r'QRBQAIZD nF ADJUS7MENT Ccrtificatc of ExcmPtian No.: APPlication No.: 0 ~-2~ jr^&3 Nainc of Applicant: tA 641M 7- Agcnt: Y N Stroct Address:_J 4Z~ E (&1, a Zip / Phonc - Homc: 4 ~ Clty: State: Codo: Work: ~ Z~ ' Agcnts No. Namc of Propcrty Ownct(s): S trcct Address: Zip Phonc - Homa: City: Statc: Codc: Woric: REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circlc appropriatc acdon): ~ Variancc(s)_) Conditional Usc Pcrmit Nonconforming LotlUsc Waiver oi' Violation Tcmporary Usc/Structurc Othcr: FOR STAFF USE ONLY CODE:~ ORDINANCE Citc Rogulations Sectlon(s): 4-DqA, Oqd Property pNiolation/ Scction: ~ Townsbip: Z500" Raagc: 44 Sizc:/P;23JLWorccmcnt: Y N Existing Zoning: Comp. Plan Dcsignation: ~ IEGAL r4o( PSSA: Y N UTA: N ASA: Y~N FIItE DIST.; CHECKED BY: i cd Hearing Date: Personnel Taking in Application: Existing Usa of Propcrty: i ~ Describe In cndcd Proposal In Terms of REQUESTED ACI'IONS above: LhtC'<'4`lce +0l, Strcct Address of Propcrty: s<aP qS g~d V~ Legal escription f Pro rty (include casement, if applicablo): s. Parcel No(s): 2 a ~ Source of L,ogal: -a)~- ~'~'~►c'~o ni v ~ Total amount of adjoining land controllad by this owner/sponsor: yVhat intarest do you bold in thc propcrty? r'rz,)y►e::;,r Please list previous Planning Department actioas involving this property: I S WEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJ[JRY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECOR.D OR AUTHOFti7.ED AGENT FOR THE PROFOSED SITE; (2) IF NOT TBE OWNER, WRrrrEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORTLINO MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) ALL QF THE ABOVE RESPONSFS AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE NiADE TRUTHE=ULLY AND'PO THE BEST OF MY KNOyVL.EDGE. Signcd: , Address: Phonc No.: Datc: NOTARY SEAL: Notary: Date: , Page 1 of 4 (Over) Revised 3-4-88 r, 1 , s / A. BC1 DEN OF PROOF It is ncccssary for the applicant or his/hcr represcntativc to cstablish' the reasons why the REQUESTED AGTION should bc approvcd and to Zitcrally put fonh the basic casc. Accordingly, you should havc bccn given a form for your requcstcd action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you prescnt your casc in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return it with your applicatioa. If you did not get a form, ask the Planning Dcpartmcnt personnel for advice on how to procccd. B. SICN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS ANI) OTHER ACENCIES , 1. CQUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT . a) Proposcd mcthod of watcr supply: b) Proposcd mcthod of scwagc disposal: A prcliminary consultation has bccn hcld to discuss c proposal. Thc applicant has bccn informcd of rcquircmonAc) tandards. (Signaturc) ( ' (Si gn-off Waived) CQt1NTY ENCINEERINC DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been hcld to discuss the proposal. Thc applicant has be informed o r ir ments and standaids. -07 ' Sign ure) (Date) (Sign-off Waived) \ OCOUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (yVaiva if outsidc yVMAi [ ] A prcliminiry consultation has btcu hcld to discuss the proposal. Thc applicant has bccn informcd of rcquircmcnts and standards. (Signaturc) (Date) (Sign-off Waivcd) - " >licant is rcquircd to discuss the proposal with to bccome informcd of water system ~ .ncnts and standards. Thc applicant is rcquircd to discuss the proposal with to bccomo informed of sewaee dtsposat rcquiremcnts aAd standards. . 04. WATER PLIRVEYnR~ (W$ive if ouiside CWSSA) a) Tho proposal islis not locatcd within the boundary of our futurc scrvicc arca. b) Thc proposal ys/is noi locatcd within the boundary of our currcnt district. c) We arc/are not able to scrve this site with adcquatc watcr, d) Satisfactory arrangcments bavCfhave not been made to serve this proposal. (Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived) ~EWERAGE PURYEYOR: (If other than Spolcane County) A preliminary consultaiion has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of rcquircmcnts and standards, (Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived) Pagc 2 of 4 ,.`1 i . , - ~ rz,.n , CL i'it-iii•iiy n&ifc~~,~ ~.;r. 12622 LGNORl1 Cr.nsuSTricl (;;ly SPOKANE Counly SPOKANE Stalc WA Zip Code 99106 ( . - _ . _ I.Mi.11 0r.sr,iijiliun 1,OT 3, BLOCK 11, fiILLVIEW F.STATES (q (Iv;nr,ilQCCUpanl LEROY b t-10LLY KUNZ Map ficlcrente I . ( . .r 39' I, I ! f HOt1SL PROPOSEp. 36 ' G'ARAGE ~ I A ~ . a I ~ . ; ~ N ~ i ~ i A ! ~ w E 77' I ~ I PLOT P LAN S I . ..Y.-..--- - _ . 4 . S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ . ~ ~g 4~{ . . . . , ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ 1 ,~-►5 , ' ~ ~ ~ ~ R` ~ ~ . t ~ "'r i i!S i ~ i ~ ~ t ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y, ' " l ~ ' ; ~ ~ ~S j ~ y . . l , , t ~ 1 f ~ ~ ~ ~1 i C t, i ? ; I'► M , I ~ ~ , ~ lsl~ ~