2008, 06-06 Determination of Non-Significance COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
�„, �/ �� PLANNING DIVISION
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106;Spokane Valley WA 99206
✓✓ 509.921.1000 • Fax:509.921.1008 • citvhall(aspokanevallev.org
DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS)
FILE NUMBER: REZ-10-07
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Rezone request from Community Business (B-2) to Light Industrial (I-2) for a
towing impound lot.
PERSON COMPLETING FORM: William Szabrowicz; 12309East Portland Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA
99206
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Parcel 45036.0209; addressed as 12315 East Portland Avenue; located
approximately 130 feet east of the intersection of Portland Avenue and Cement Road; further located in the
NW 'A of the SW '/a of Section 3, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,
Washington
LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Planning Division
DETERMINATION: The City of Spokane Valley adopted Ordinance No. 48, effective March 31, 2003, that
implemented on an interim basis the Spokane Environmental Ordinance, effective November 19, 2002 and its
provisions. The lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse
impact on the environment, if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not
required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on
request.
This DNS is issued pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for fourteen
(14) calendar days from the date issued (below). Comments must be received by this department no later
than 5:00 p.m.,June 27,2008.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: STAFF CONTACT:
Kathy McClung, Community Development Director Karen E. Kendall, Assistant Planner
City of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Community Development
Department, Planning Division Department,Planning Division
Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue,
Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
PH: (509) 688-0240/FX: (509) 921-1008 PH: (509) 688-0172/FX: (509) 921-1008
kmcclung@spokanevalley.org kkendall@spokanevalley.org
DATE ISSUED: June 6, 2008 SIGNATURE: ' I
� Akii2kuko
APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the ommunity Development
Department within fourteen (14) calendar days of this decision. This appeal must be written and make
specific factual objections to the City's threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance
with Section 21.20.150 (Appeals) of the City's Environmental Ordinance, and the required fees pursuant to the
City's adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Pursuant to Section 21.20.150 of the
City's Interim Environmental Ordinance, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination.
Determination of Non-significance
REZ-10-07 •
June 6,2008
Copies of this DNS were mailed to:
1. William Szabrowicz; 12309East Portland Avenue; Spokane Valley, WA 99206
2. City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering Division
3. City of Spokane Valley Building Division
4. Spokane County Fire Department No. 1
5. Spokane County Division of Utilities
6. Spokane Regional Health District
7. Irvin Water District No. 6
8. Washington State Department of Ecology(Olympia)
9. Washington State Department of Ecology(Spokane)
10. Spokane Tribe of Indians
11. Qwest
12. Avista
End: Lead Agency Review
SEPA Checklist
Site Plan
Page 2 of 2
Spokane
jValley�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106;Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000•Fax:509.921.1008♦ cityhall@a,spokanevalley.org
LEAD AGENCY
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW
DATE: June 6,2008
A. BACKGROUND
Project Number: REZ-10-07
Application Description: Rezone request from Community Business (B-2)to Light
Industrial(I-2) for a towing impound lot.
Location: Parcel 45036.0209; addressed as 12315 East Portland Avenue;
located approximately 130 feet east of the intersection of
Portland Avenue and Cement Road; further located in the NW 1A
of the SW 1/4 of Section 3,Township 25 North,Range 44 East,
Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington
Owner/Applicant: William Szabrowicz; 12309East Portland Avenue; Spokane
Valley, WA 99206
Lead Agency: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department,
Planning Division
REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTAL QUESTIONS OF SECTION 14 OF PART A(BACKGROUND)FOR
CRITICAL AQUIFER RECHARGE AREA(CARA)/AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA(ASA)
The proposal lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area(ASA). The SEPA Checklist does not
identify any specific development proposals except use.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
Italics indicate potential mitigation measures, if any. Bold indicates unresolved issues or
additional information that must be addressed by the applicant prior to final approval, as
indicated.
City of Spokane Valley June 6,2008
Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 1 of 4
REZ-10-07
1. EARTH
The SEPA Checklist states the site's topography is flat. The Checklist states grading will
consist of scraping grass and topsoil to replace with crushed gravel on the driveway and
parking area. Staff notes all travel surfaces and parking shall be paved unless a waiver is
granted. Staff notes the Checklist does not address a specific quantity of filling or
grading. An amended SEPA checklist will be required to be submitted with an
engineered grading permit addressing specific questions relating to section B.1.a-h.
As an advisory, all activity must follow Section 24.50 (Excavation,Fill and Grading)
of the City of Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code(UDC).
2. AIR
The Checklist states there will be no air impacts to/from the site. Staff notes the site is
required to be paved unless a waiver is granted to minimize dust. Staff notes that the site
shall conform to Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency requirements to minimize air
impacts.
3. WATER
The SEPA Checklist states the site is not located within 200 feet of any water body. There are
no proposed plans to withdrawal or discharge to any surface water body. Staff notes the
property is not located within a 100-year floodplain pursuant to Community Panel No.530174
0300 C of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRM) [Federal Emergency Management Agency,
September 30, 1992]. No concerns noted.
Ground
The Checklist does not specify method(s) disposing of stormwater runoff. Staff notes that
stormwater will be addressed at the time a formal grading permit is applied for. No
concerns noted.
Water Runoff
The Checklist does not specify method(s) of collecting stormwater runoff Staff notes that
stormwater will be addressed at the time a formal grading permit is applied for. No
concerns noted.
4. PLANTS
The site's current vegetation is grass and weeds. Staff notes the site currently has a
perimeter fence. Additional landscaping may be proposed and/or required with necessary
permits to change use of property. No concerns noted.
5. ANIMALS
The Checklist states birds were observed on the site and that no endangered or threatened
species are known to exist on the site. No concerns noted.
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Electricity and natural gas are available throughout the site. No concerns noted.
City of Spokane Valley June 6,2008
Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 2 of 4
REZ-10-07
7A. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS
Not applicable.
7B. NOISE
The Checklist states there is no noise associated with proposal. Staff notes there may be
noise associated with unloading vehicles, which was not addressed in the checklist.All
noise on the project site shall be consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Municipal
Code(SVMC) Section 8.25.060 (Noise),which includes allowable hours of property
maintenance.
8. SHORELINE AND LAND USES
The request is for Light Industrial (I-2)zoning for a towing impound lot. The
Comprehensive Plan designation is Mixed Use Center(MUC). The site existing zoning is
Community Business (B-2). The site has an existing manufactured home which, is
intended to be used as an office or storage associated with towing impound lot. There are
residences to the south, east and west and commercial/industrial uses to the north and east.
No concerns noted.
9. HOUSING
Staff notes the existing manufactured home is intended to be used as an office following an
approval of a change of use. No concerns noted.
10. AESTHETICS
Staff notes all existing buildings shall remain. The site currently has a gravel driveway and
parking area surrounded by a six(6)foot vinyl fence. Landscaping and additional concerns
will be reviewed at the time a building permit is submitted. No concerns noted.
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
The checklist states no lighting is proposed. Staff notes if lighting is proposed a lighting
plan and photometric drawing will be required. No concerns noted.
12. RECREATION
The project site is located south west of Plante's Ferry Park and Centennial Trail and
northwest of Mirabeau Park. The project will not displace any of these recreational uses
and does not propose measures to reduce or increase recreational opportunities. No
concerns noted.
13. CULTURAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION
The Checklist specifies that there are no known historical and cultural resources at the
subject's property. Pursuant to RCW 27.53.060, on the private and public lands of this
state it shall be unlawful for any person,firm,corporation,or any agency or institution
of the state or a political subdivision thereof to knowingly remove, alter, dig into, or
excavate by use of any mechanical,hydraulic, or other means,or to damage, deface, or
destroy any historic or prehistoric archaeological resource or site, or remove any
archaeological object from such site,except for Indian graves or cairns,or any glyptic or
City of Spokane Valley June 6,2008
Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 3 of 4
REZ-10-07
painted record of any tribe or peoples, or historic graves as defined in chapter 68.05
RCW, disturbances of which shall be a class C felony punishable under chapter 9A.20
RCW, without having obtained a written permit from the Director of the Washington
State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation for such activities. Upon any
discovery of potential or known archaeological resources at the subject properties prior
to or during future on-site construction, the developer, contractor, and/or any other
parties involved in construction shall immediately cease all on-site construction,shall act
to protect the potential or known historical and cultural resources area from outside
intrusion, and shall notify,within a maximum period of twenty-fours from the time of
discovery, the City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department of said
discovery.
14. TRANSPORTATION
The site is located on the north side of Portland Avenue. The City's Development Engineering
Division did not have any comments and is deferring until review of the commercial building
permit for a change of use including determining transportation concurrency. No concerns
noted.
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
Spokane County Fire District No. 1 is the fire protection service provider for the City of
Spokane Valley,and the police service provider is the City of Spokane Valley. The Spokane
Transit Authority provides public transit service within the City of Spokane Valley. No
concerns noted.
16. UTILITIES
The subject's property is located within the service boundaries of Spokane County Division of
Utilities and Irvin Water District. Other utilities such as electricity,telephone and garbage are
to be provided by franchise utility providers in conformance with applicable City standards and
requirements. No concerns noted.
City of Spokane Valley June 6,2008
Determination of Non-Significance(DNS) Page 4 of 4
REZ-10-07
RECEIVED
MAY 2 9 2001
SPOKANE VALLEY
COMDEPARTMENTIEOPMENT
ENVI RONMENTAL
CHECKLIST
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL
ORDINANCE
SECTION 11 . 1O . 230 [ I ]
Updated November 19, 2002
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA 1E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Environmental Checklist
File No. 107--
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to
consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of
the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify
impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help
the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental
agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant,
requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or
give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you
should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire
experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write "do not
know"or"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations.
Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems,the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal,even if you plan to do them over a period of time or
on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its
environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals,even though questions may be answered"does not apply."
IN ADDITION,complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D).
For nonproject actions,the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"
should be read as"proposal,""proposer,"and"affected geographic area,"respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project,if applicable: 4/4
2. Name of applicant: 41 t-/1217 ,S 2 93 ai?v 1411C 7--
3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: 0- 3 0 g Lc- P�.97GetirJ
A116 P•va4.-4 S'Q9- 9RV- /5.4./3
4. Date checklist prepared: S " 3 " C)
5. Agency requesting checklist SPoi?'. vc L Le
PAGE 2 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA' t
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing,if applicable): s, P
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes,explain.- G110
b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes,explain. _
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared,or will be prepared,
directly related to his proposal. /7Q t'/1=E4 S '-4'7"- '4 RSA
•
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals
directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes,explain. —sy0
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal,if known.
lee Z t- .4 7 0 1-
11. Give brief,complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the
project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain
aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. Al.
s0</• ./A. -e e/711_,776—c: 44.0.c j'V Re ct C4•s 7
OSEi3 'Zit.9 i /--dog : A #709/0 .•01-,e- .4?&6 Q
70 ,..770,Q&" S7,2Z7 fr7P01> ✓9 (D/?. ciA.,
PAGE 3 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information to a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and
range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries
of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if
reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not
required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to
this checklist. J4 /)/ f7 IiV /1 77,1 c7/09 O4 T o9
13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer
Service Area? The Priority Sewer Servicd Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's
ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries.) YZ' • /0074 "77717e/ii:iO
14. The following questions supplement Part A.
a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area(CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area(ASA)
(1) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed
for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as
those for the disposal of stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of
system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of
material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system
inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities).
AWL/6
(2) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels)be stored in aboveground
or underground storage tanks? If so,what types and quantities of material will be stored?
•
(3) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored
or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater. This includes measures to
keep chemicals out of disposal systems.
� A/07 —
PAGE 4 OF 18
•
POKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAL
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
(4) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak
will drain to surface or groundwater or to a stormwater disposal system discharging to
surface or groundwater?
4.0fO -
b. Stormwater
(1) What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock(if known)?
/N0! %rovi) ✓'t-i
(2), Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so,describe any potential impacts?
0 _.
•
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for
Agency Use
1. Earth Only
a. General description of the site(circle one): flat,rolling,hilly,steep slopes,
mountains,other.. L4 7 /r?I24
b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)?
— C)
c. What general types of soils are found on the site(for example,clay,sand,
gravel,peat,muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify
them and note any prime farmland. 7%IP>CL, .5`.t�u�tniv�
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so,describe.— Ai 0
PAGE 5 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA. ,E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Evaluation for
Agency Use
e. Describe the purpose,type,and approximate quantities of any filling or grading
proposed. Indicate source of fill: c�i,�
SC/OA PC' ci)-. GR-os�' V-7013,50/2- ,- d�<�L nc cam- ce I
ui" c/?eS' '° C-,r' -6 G 12,26-* -OA/ 16.J O1/4)
,v-
5
Could erosion occur as a result of clearing,construction,or use? If so,generally 1-4,
describe.
44!0
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after
project construction(for example,asphalt or buildings)? 4bL--
ldh/r'L Gltid„ 4/2 6 ,i'1 c j l�,f- 5;:n.-CC /Q c 3 "
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth,if
any: — —
2. Air
a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal(i.e.,dust,
automobile,odors,industrial,wood smoke) during construction and when the
project is completed?If any,generally describe and give approximate quantities if
known. 1r✓04�6 s
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so,generally describe. --
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air,if
any: sr,/7
3. Water
a. SURFACE:
PAGE 6 OF 18
}POKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA'
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Evaluation for
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site Agency Use.
(including year-round and seasonal streams,saltwater,lakes,ponds,wetlands)? On
If yes,describe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or
river it flows into.
U
(2) Will the project require any work over,in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet) the
described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. _
—47/7 _.
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or '
removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site
that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give
general description,purpose,and approximate quantities if known.
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so,note
location on the site plan.
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface
waters? If so, describe the type of waste. and anticipated volume of
discharge.
----q/ b
b. GROUND:
(1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to
groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quantities if known.
PAGE 7 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAL.-E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Evaluation for
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic Agency Use
tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of Only
the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the number
of persons the system(s)are expected to serve.
c. WATER RUNOFF(INCLUDING STORMWATER):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of
collection and disposal if any(include quantities,if known). Where will this
water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so,describe.
01P4/i+." -" vol/Ott/ Sc3:211.5 /A/7 0
1/45-7'i so — v`o 40121 i>;riw i- 4c✓L•LLQ
/W 6 O'4- 7%) 13Z. 7
Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally
describe.
J
d. PROPOSED MEASURES to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff
water impacts,if any.
pp/4
4. Plants
a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site:
Deciduous tree: alder,maple,aspen,other.
Evergreen tree: fir,cedar,pine,other.
Shrubs
)< Grass ( !->G 4-
Pasture
Crop or grain
Wet soil plants,cattail, buttercup,bullrush,skunk cabbage, other.
Water plants:water lilly,eelgrass,milfoil,other. _ /
)( Other types of vegetation. S y
PAGE 8 OF 18
POKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA'
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Evaluation for
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Agency Use
G.4P,4 s S ivEZ4: Only
c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. _
—
d. Proposed landscaping,use of native plants,or other measures to preserve or
enhance vegetation on the site,if any: ' ye:zz i.-C_ '
•
5. Animals
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site are
known to be on or near the site: ���
birds: hawk,heron,eagle,songbirds,other. �✓7•7'74L " &Pi�:y O
mammals: deer,bear,elk, beaver,other: svpitrG --
fish: bass,salmon, trout, herring,shellfish,other. —NM —
other:
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
uvG
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so,explain.
—wt,
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any:
— ay —
6. Energy and natural resources
a. What kinds or energy(electric,natural gas,wood stove,solar)will be used to
meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used
for heating,manufacturing,etc. -- R/07 424CUL /Q d Z)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so,generally describe. -- 4'6 -
PAGE 9 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA 'E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Evaluation for
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this Agency Use
proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Only
impacts,if any:
p✓v 1P6 Qi,R60
7. Environmental health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so,describe. - aV 0
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Jt✓�D/t' i r'S I S744•/9)R)9 0-4.94-.3e s
P.1.4)66- Y Icnc E` e-
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards,if
any:
,2tru74/.2d r)
b. NOISE:
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for
example: traffic,equipment,operation,other)?
*.4/4 '
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the Q-1C-C\
project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic ��
construction, operation,other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from
the site.
Own. Oz:i2 14;A/ —• Iv'b ✓L 0 OJ D.9 / c.9? , ` Cc 10`.
e\NI\e-
(3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts,if any:
—.,v0 f ..ec ' 2 '/72 e
PAGE 10 OF 18
?OKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAP
•
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Evaluation for
8. Land and shoreline use Agency Use
Only
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
vil - 1=i6[ �J - )2.QL - A' J'L 5- v. /3v3in c'SS 4 s
1.4,gfit 5' I JIV Co.7/3.i✓Lci'5 Vi, i /3o:vnJ
i/re 7R6"4"
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so,describe. 42/0
O. /3 P/ i t-e? -
c. Describe any structures on the site. 170131.6 An)17e - 7-0 S747
/DS 0/-'/ )C6 ��7�? 7 V e'r3!'�;�'`l - `,- sane L
,c;i0.04 6 S/,(/0 6 - 117-4.46"
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,which?` /I/
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? /3_a
O
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? `��
kJ,
/`7 'L �l l/SF v
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the
site?
444 -.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area? If so,specify. _
.e.voil///
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
,,VOyL/e•
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: _.
•
PAGE 11 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA, 3
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Evaluation for
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and Agency Use
projected land uses and plans,if any: Only
44/41/4. L4 APl34 L //410 Pet' 4,,,f'2,f'A j P/ Circ,-)(,Pk►a.0
9. Housing."'" 4 ._._.
•
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high,middle or low-income housing. ��`�
/v4
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate � a
whether high-,middle-or low-income housing.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts,if any:
10. Aesthetics r �
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s),not including antennas;
what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed?
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? _
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts,if any:
- -40,;74
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur? --4V4/
PAGE 12 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAN^E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Evaluation for
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere Agency Use
with views? �� _ Only
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: _
12. Recreation Q6( 4–1
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediat- -e c
vicinity? o:n d ��L
_ m Qa
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant,if any:
13. Historic and cultural preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or
local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally
describe.
— A/4
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological,
scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts,if any:
PAGE 13 OF 18
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA, ..:E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10230(1) Evaluation for
14. Transportation Agency Use
Only
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed
access to the existing street system. Show on site plans,if any.
s>7e 4022.4-.1./ 77-4cwes—/0
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop? '` ./1/4
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate? /2/4' —
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air
transportation? If so,generally describe.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known,indicate when peak would occur.
,aeR )//' J�t�ih' /- fS 3 Y/2
ex y c -, /a.a/71•, t- p-o?,"
(Note:to assist in review and if known indicate vehicle trips during PM peak,
AM Peak and Weekday(24 hours).)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts,if any: _
v/1 7Q
15. Public services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example:
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,,generally
describe. -
,-.— 4/0 ---
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any:
PAGE 14 OF 18
IPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA' G
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Evaluation for
16. Utilities •
Agency Use
Only
a. Circleutilities currently availabl- - ' e: electriciti s zatural gas,ovate
servic telephone sanitary sewer septic syste o ter:
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the
service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate
vicinity which might be needed.-- ./:v-z v/,e-,0 J4/ "340,'6'7
\C. SIGNATURE
I,the undersigned,swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best
of my knowledge. I also understand that,should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full
disclosure on my part,the agency must withdraw any determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist.
Date: Signature:
Please Print or Type:
Proponent Address:
Phone:
•
Person completing
form(if different
from proponent): '`. Address:
Phone: \
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Staff member(s)reviewing checklist \
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other ertinent information,the staff
concludes that:
A. there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends Determination of
Nonsignificance.
B. probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current roposal and
recommends a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance with conditions.
there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a Determination of
/ Significance.
PAGE 15 OF 18
'SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDIN/ ?E
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(Do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general,it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of elements of the environment.
When answering these questions,be aware of the extent the proposal,or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general
terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;emissions to air;
production,storage or release of toxic or hazardous substances;or production of
noise?
(.,t,/O /', Ai°
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish or marine life?
4004'.5 A/0 APPI
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants,animals,fish or marine life are: p )1-q-
-4/44
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
% Cti/vr.Y2 r✓ 4/0
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
,VA'-
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas
designated(or eligible or under study)for governmental protection,such as parks,wilderness,
wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat,historic or cultural sites,wetlands,
flood plains or prime farmlands?
17/4
PAGE 16 OF 18 •
POKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINA'
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,including whether
it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
A/A
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services
and utilities?
(ir/OI/L/) /V 01
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are:
7. Identify,if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
C. SIGNATURE
I,the undersigned,swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best
of my knowledge. I also understand that,should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full
disclosure on my part,the agency may withdraw any Determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist.
Date: e 2 7` 0 7 Signature: y'�
Please Print or Type:
Proponent. G//4L-)4/7 67-4/3RQ14/ Z-- , Address: /2'30 7 c' Pa#2/.4 4)1.4) -D7,&
Phone: S'09- 6e,--/c4/3 SPJ>r/ .6. VAL
Person completing form(if different from proponent): 192 O C
Address:
Phone:
PAGE 17 OF 18
X:C'.
a
Cki
C. o,
-'-rte __;r; -.-h _.._ : .
V. ti
a ii o�! `I i
k 1
.i,; —r --1-- • -II
i ! I
/ r/ l 7 r
r // d/I2o'.)06.,c•Poiii. A.4- J i .r ':7 �,, i1 I ,. —r i, ;
V 0
ZS
iT6<Z • G/A/E, 1 _I ^co Eirfolo " /�o n '',fit P 1 ''„j. MRI Pt. [``. �:.; � y v
I i
/�' ! 1 It • 0 3/ 6 • Non . �y. �1 ccly I Q +o•,:.s. +_ 1 ! -4_� o
— B GGy , .' *y'f �
I ctc i Digi , ________,,,,I' I K
UgL'• 0/7/i/&- vi. ho/�,�j
•
I ' ' ;
611(17 s,"o
1---
-1
i I I
I
-1
T J
1
RECEIVED
V45,1007
�}1
E ART,
r NTF -I
COW/1U TYa - lOPMEIUT
I
_- ;•
!
I ; 1 L
I1 I—'r I r i 1- t --i