HomeMy WebLinkAbout24800 PE-1504B
, - .
. 1; IMEER'S ~VIEW SHE
Projeat. Staftis Active ' - •
,
_.AsBu~it ,~Ja~r~~ R~~~ived Plats Fi1e PE_ I;+Q`4~$- . . .
_RQad f Ians Approved Cpenpanion File.s:
New IZoad Standards 5-15-95 Mylar
. Related FlilES:
_H',earing: ~ 'Building Dept;
'l'eOhnical RevieNv:
Prelimina_ry Revie%v: 04/6611999 Type: Schedlilsd For ~ Large Lot. 0 Bldg. Squ_a_re rFeet
_ Dare Received: 4414611999 No. Lots: Na. Acres:
Project vame S~'.I~IVAN PARK CENTERTJAN~ON CENTER EM'C.' t . -
Sire Aaare-ss N. 1-90, E. sULLi,vnr,,
~ange-fiowns`hip-$ection: 44 -25 - 12
Applicamif, Cbridicions Mailed: ~ 45123. .
Susan _Kurph;y f lood Zqne
;1NT,A.mw 1'A0-mc EiarN,~~.ra1NG l-NC Water Sbucce _
_ 707 W. ~'(,hAv y Ste200 SGwer Sburce .
SPOIUt~ WA 99204 ~ . ~ .
School Dist j _
F ax Fire DiSt - , .
(509) 44`9-6$44 (509} 45$-6$44 : . .
}'hone'Dist •
-
- Rng 8 ill~iln~ Qivncr
. Y Y_ Z I4ANSV ~`'[TRISS, hIA~~~ONlNDUSTRIES • ,
1510 2:11! [nA-1 arwa, 15102 L. lndiana
~ S15O1KANE, ~'~WA 99216= SPOKAN"E, WA 99216-
phpne Fax f'hQne Fax
(509) 992=5252 (509) 922-5757 (509) 992-5252 (509) 922: s7s7,
~-igned Nmao: - .1.~413FRT J DO'1C~E Vt'
13u%ld i,n.~g,~?* , 675 f Nlanning Ph: 454-2245 Contact.:
Descri,ption- I
Eng ~Iee~l '1ech~nicalty Complete Eng IVeetI.~lar4a_r,d ~`Ztl Mitigation . .
F#ng Nsed Drainage 1'lans _ Bn,g'Naed `l'raffic Aaialiysis Eng Need Other •
Bng Pay rees Received - Eng Final :Pla,t Fees CompletEd . '
Copy f0 Accaunfing r. -
;-Mg ~Pri4rity fe~s Receiveti
- ~ ~ N4ttice to PubliG ~ Natice tb Pu6'lia # l 3 4 f Cqmpleted -or NFetls to be signed
_ L'?esigm DeZtii.afli"on Date$ (Jn,-04t)
,
. ~
l_/ l J l ! T~'a 4uanves, rfa .
drainage ite.r,n calculated
F1earing DaCe DeGision A,pp Den , CQndi AppJ.tl :BCC -
Appealett Co BGC Decision App 17en ~ Cbnd ApPld Couxr
A.ppEaled tb Cburt'.DeciSion App Dcn Cond Appld
f ~ Staniped !M~ylars to Secretary (Sandy) _
;
/ f Stamped 24$ Lot Plaus to Secretary (Sandy) cA . . x2l, -
~1 Xf
- , - -
WTA~~1
_
2, 3 ,
V&5 2 tlw_ oo w~ &tiatFrt 4Wei*' 'p p6VeA4vV*,- :
v A
1~~~~~('~ G~.~ ~c ~~cr~s►'~ - - - .~'4/
,
r ~ .
~ - ~ L_
~
1NLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
707 W. 7th Ave., Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 458-6840 Fax: (509) 458-6844
TO:
.DATE:
;r~•~ ~ i~~,; i . ~ • ~i~~' ~i~;~~~ , ^
l.~., ir;~:;~•, ; , 3
,P~orEcT
. . , ,
ATTENTION:
l jyI/7~ PR~?~CT ~N
;A':,~~~,,~~.~~'''':., ,
,W~.,~~
( f~~~_~~
~ ' ii i~ i ~ i i ~ ri li•~ ~ i' i' ~ ii~i~~~~~'~
Description
Xerox Prints Copy of Letter
Original Drawing N~ Contract Documents M~
r~ Work Authorization M~ Report
r~
No. Copies Descript *on
Purpose
~
M~ Information M~ Review & Comments M-fler Your Request
r~ Written Approval r~ Signature & Return
r~
Remarks
2
Signed:
cc:
D:\TRNSMT.PMS
• ~ y~ ' ~
BEFORE
THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PI.ANNING
I
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1504-85; ) CONCLUSIONS AND
SULLIVAN PARK CENTER AN ) DECISION
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT )
THIS MATTER, a request for an Extension of Time from Hanson Industries, Inc. has been
received and was decided upon, pursuant to the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Section
12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140, on the 5' day of May, 1998.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
this decision by the Spokane County Director of Building and Planning.
2. The proposal was to divide approximately 226 acres into 42 lots for a 79 acre regional
shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial use, a 22 acre business paxk, a 53 acre
industrial park, a 300 room hotel and 43 acres of roadway and open space.
3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by Board of County Commissioners on March
25, 1986.
4. The proposal is located north of I-90, on either side of Sullivan Road, south of the Spokane
R.iver in Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, ToNAmship 25N, Range 44 EWM Spokane County,
Washington.
5. The existing zoning of the property is Community Business (B-2), Regional Business (B-
3), Light Industrial (I-2) and General Agricultural (GA). Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the
proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing zones.
6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this are of the preliminary plat as Industrial and the
location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation
remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval.
7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the
expiration of preliminary plats, short plats, or binding site plans. These criteria are found in
Chapter 12.100.118 (Extension of Time) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and
have been used as a basis for this decision. The following is the relevant section of Chapter
12.100.118:
"The Director may administratively approve an extension provided there are no
significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat or binding site
plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further provided one
or more of the following circumstances is found to apply."
1) That some portion of the existing preliminary subdivision or binding site plan has
been finalized since the pi•oject was approved and the remaining lots would form a
unified development consistent with the original approval.
•
• f
~
• • ` J) ` ~
RESPONSE:
Of the 42 lots approved in the original preliminary plat, four (4) have been finalized and are
within the final plat of Sullivan Park Center, which was recorded on April 26, 1990.
2) That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan i°emains
generally consistent wilh original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the
sponsoY has taken substantial steps toward finalizing the plut or binding site plan,
which shall include one, but is not limited to the following.•
a. surveying the lots within the development;
b. arranging for publ ic services to !he site;
c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision,
short subdivision, or binding site plan;
d. the completion of studies or otheY requirements which were part of preliminary
subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval.
RESPONSE:
The remaining portions of the preliminary plat remain consistent with the preliminary plat of
record and the applicant has participated in construction of Indiana Avenue within the finalized
portion of the preliminary plat and extending westerly towards Pines Road. The applicant has
also improved the Sullivan Road/Indiana Avenue interchange. A portion of the original
preliminary plat was aggregated with adjacent properties to the south via Certificate of
Exemption (CE-122-98/H-E), and this property is no longer within the preliminary plat of record.
The applicant has participated in various studies to identify infrastructure needs associated with
the future Evergreen interchange with I-90. Phase II and subsequent phases of the original
preliminary plat cannot be finalized until construction of the new Evergreen/I-90 interchange
(and other infrastructure improvements), and the applicant has taken substantial steps towards
completing the final plat.
3) That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposul was
conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This
provision shall not apply to public utility extensions which the project sponsor would
nornially fund.
RESPONSE:
The original preliminary plat includes specific conditions which require extensive infrastructure
improvements to the adjoining transportation network and complete funding has not been
available to complete the required infrastructure.
4) That administration delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat
within the f ve (S) year time period.
RESPONSE:
The original preliminary plat approval period was for three years and the preliminary plat has
received three previous extensions of time. This is the fourth extension of time and the
preliminary plat has maintained approval status for approximately 13 years. Administrative
delays in design and funding of the future Evergreen/I-90 interchange have caused subsequent
delays in finalizing Phase II and Phase III of the original preliminary plat.
Extension of Time PE-1504-85 2
:
As specified by Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, the Director
may grant one three (3) year time extension that may include any additional or altered conditions
and requirements recommended by affected agencies. Additional one (1) year time extensions
inay be granted by the Director beyond the initial three (3) year extension. This Extension of
Time request is the first extension request processed under the Spokane County Subdivision
Ordinance adopted on December 17, 1996 and effective on January l, 1997. Therefore, a three
(3) year extension of time is provided for by the above-referenced section of the Subdivision
Ordinance. Subsequent extensions are limited to one (1) year as specified above.
8. Additional updated conditions have been recommended by the Spokane County Division of
Utilities - Stormwater Utility. No other agencies provided updated conditions.
DECISION
Based upon the above Findings of Fact an!rIo clusions, an extension of time request for
PE-1504-85 is hereby APPROVE 1 0'011~'
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1. All those conditions of approval attached to the original~ reliminary plat, as,approved by
the Board of County Commissioners on n~ 'r(including those conditions of
approval adopted by the Hearing Examiner Committee attached to the Board's decision as
E~hb.i~tA;-d~_ _ ~~ta~e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~l~ A together with the following updated conditions.
2. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Section
12.100.118 of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time.
~
3. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval to ~The applica.nt may
request an extension of time by submitting a written requ st (30) days prior to
the expiration date.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING (CTPDATED)
l. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial ~
compliance with Chapter 12.100.118 (Extensions of Time) of the Spokane County
Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the preliminary plat approval will become null and void.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED)
1. Site development shall comply with the current Spokane County standards for Road & Sewer
construction and the guidelines for stormwater management. -
DATED THIS 5`h DAY OF MAY, 1998.
~
W.PED kSON
enior Planner
Extension of Time PE-1504-85 3
Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the
Spokane County Hearing Examiner. If you desire to file an appeal, you must submit the
appropriate Appeal Application together with the required Fee, payable to the Spokane County
Division of Building and Plan.ning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision
is signed. Upon receipt of a complete appeal application, a public hearing will be scheduled.
If you have any questions, please call the Division of Building and Planning at 456-3675.
c: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads
Spokane County Division of Building & Planning
Spokane County Division of Utilities
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility
Spokane Regional Health District
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Hanson Industries, Inc.
John Konen, David Evans & Associates
Simpson Engineering
File
Extension of Time PE-1504-85 4
" _ _ - ~ ' . '
~E'~Q~UEST FOR DESIG~ ; ,~E~;~ (~N
.
s30.00
DATI E A-pri1 6; :ZOO.i
~ - _R(4.4D 1_~AME Indiana Avenue CRPI.,R)I?,. #
_ NA'NIE" 4~ ~LAT Hanson Center East ~ , . Plat # PE-1504-85
~ ADDRU~S~ Of ]BLDG ~ ~ ' .
N - ME fJf BLDG PROJEC'.C Bx.D(;# n9 s T R
FE]~ERAL./STAM PRUJECT # ~ •PROTEf.'T LIMM East o f Su1livan Road
. . _ _ .
EXISTIN'G COND ~'1~~~tS:. ~'ROP~S~I~ I'M:E?1tO~I~NTS:
• '.,,ti~a::~ ~y~ - . •
~.A~~:,~W~.~ • - 2" CLA, 2it ~C:GE
90'rA~ Over 9 "
C
Current TraMc Count lae,sign Year Traffic Cou,ut
D-;>~CRUM-ON
PROPMEO;~E-SIGN DMUT'.[ON Use native.m_a_.terial und.er ,Tvpe B curb and .gutter instOad- of
.
crus~h~e-_':dc~na top course as shown, on Snokane C'.duntv $tandard Plan A-1 and app,ro:ved_ Indiana
A venut-;'; i, cio_ss section. . _ _ . , . • .
; ~ . .
. . ~.J 4. : ~ .
V '
•z - ~ r:. r,
_ :.`r~,q,u,e~ted that native material ~be used under c~.rb in place of ro~ck t~`,'asis. o~ ~
. ~ , a ~ . - - ~ , • , ; , , : ; .
.~id~ 7 •1T , ' ' 1
atriaµl~ bei.ng, of eQua1 or ~~re~.ter structural stabili,ty. Geotechnica" ~evaluaNtI,on and_
. ~.reco~n.~.,~,e~-=`cl.,~:~t ~oii is at tache d .
- t _ . • - -
~ • - - ~ -
~ , ' • f t~~_ ,.1r . ~ : - " _ _
i... • ` . ~ _ . . _ ' -
_ ~ _ ~ .t, ~ ' _ . • . .
_ _'~I' . G ~ , " _ ' ~ . ~ r
, . - 77,"
_ _...~_~...±.31_n...~ . ___..1 _ _ . _ . • _ „ .f - - ~ • . . •
~ •R " ~ h _ ~~~.~~yS~` ' , . ~ . l'_ " ' • . . . . ' .
. • . . _ ' _ ° • ~ , • ~ • 4 .
~ ` ~ ~ ~ . ` ~ . , • , -
3UBIV,E f:i; ~E J)'-.Y - CLC Assaciates,, Tne.... . ~ D.ATE A°vr,i,2001. 'st
- - - - " - - ' ' _ '4 ' • ` - - - -
`2~04~
707' West 7th Ave~.1.~e,$~ui,t~3 WA - zI~' CO 99 .
?HONE F#~ ~ -1~ 5091~ 458-6$40 (5,09) 458.=6844 (FAX) ~ ~ ~ ~ _ • '
. ,
- , - *ApMH-N`ISTRATIVE VARIIS►NM FEE OF -$30,00 PAED TU SPOKANE COUNT"Y
-1026 VV` BROAD'WAY, SPOMNE WA 99260-0170 pHON (,509)456-3600 FA,X (509)324-347$
•`..~`~'s - -REQU~ST W,ILQN~ 'i' D~, Wl~-ICSUT FUNI)S- ~A- - ~CEI`V:~D ~'Y _ ;pA7E 404
1 1 S- ♦ ~ . ' ~ . J A
t ♦ ~ y~~' ~:.yryt ~af`,j,~ J,,~y L - . _ ' , , _ - . • - _ - ~fx .
..._'i ~
YL'•W~~~~J~~~'~fTi~.~•3.~SiiVa.~,n.{'-~~~~~iGr~L`~~`J~:iF.~:»'"'_._...:.~: _G.. --3ti~_.;_`.~!-__.r~.1 _ . ~ . _ . . .t-• ' ' .x. 'i ~
-xi
DESaGN DEVIATION
• r
;TAFF RECONMENDAT.IONS
4skti;r'1` ~~~W C&,Ase:sJ..~=~ 7-4 0 6Tt6-,F cZ"*-wt^ Qe-A'Pro fti?. Ls *0 i~"'-r~mrs+'*4 r~•r4~~~r~G~•~, _ ~
f'}~►`k f~'~»'J}-~C~~r.~~.~"Q"' ~ ' - .
►.pproved Approved w/coUditions Not Approved ~ ~ .
~ Project Manager , Date
. '
ipprbved ApPrbved w/conditjons Not 1Lpproved
, . .
- Plauuing & Traffic Engi,neer :Uat'e
~ , ~ ''f~!" !~'►'?'°~c ~~p!" - .
_ ~ .
ppxoved Approved w/con-ditions Not Approved
.
/ 0-1
Project, nagement Engiaeec _ :Date
~'~'f T _ :J~ f/"'F.w1 r ,+'~,~e'.v~^'.~ .+F ~'-7!'-' ;V/'''~'"~" / ~f +A', d .'1~..~` 'C''a'~ .7~ ~.r{ ,~''Z,P er"."".r.r~" c:'~,/~"'1" ~ 4e+T'' .6/" 7i+". •
~ ,~r~ 1 ~ ~ i ,~~r ~ j ~~+w~ T ai' -~i+' .d.~ A ..A' r -
- - t_ C..' m • ;p r ' '.✓`.'~~.~'~~~'"1 J~ ~ iG.✓~~'~ ~ ! rw J ~.My'.~^"T~' J:~~...lne+r' .rl~~ ~'r'A~t 147 iA' ~s~
~l''•y'`~'"n"~. ~I"~^ 'AQ~„~"~..i*w✓'..•w~ '~,~'"''~C+~y~ - - + ~Y,~• -
pprov~~i prov va w/~onaiaons Not Approved ~
. ~ ~
~ • Oper4f'ons Engineer Date
- - - - - - - - ,
POKANE C0'[N TY ENGM, ER'S • - - -
R,MWA-T
1- QN: ~
. - - • rYI ~'m n~-c~~a.c.? ~'i~•~.~ Anl
p 715t5715 2nV
4Wrr, 7*0
pproved w/aO r.antlitions ~ Approved as recommended above Not Approv
- . ' Spokane County Engiaae~ ~ Date
s .
~ fF
CL~ • on . ' - -
I -
Associates Inc. _ _
A. ,~„~~~wMo~~wMwa.Im
April 10, 2001
7071IV. ~ Aue., Ste. 20o CLC #98573
'Spokane, WA 99204 t A~~~
j(509) 458-6840 ! Spokane County Engineers
,(509) 458-6844 Fax ~Engineering Development Services
'Spokane, WA- Denuer CO 1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
, . .
Attn: Bill Hemmings, P.E.
Re: Hanson Center East - Request for Design Deviation.
i
I
Dear Bill:
! Enclosed please a Request for Design Deviation for the crushed *surfacing to be
, placed under the curb and gutter on Indiana Avenue. Also enclosed are the
following:
A letter from STI, stamped and signed by Paul Nelson, P.E. stating his
recommendation regarding the revised section. A sieve analysis is ' . ~ enclosed as well.
■ A revised cross section for Indiana Avenue.
~
■ A check in the amount of $30.
I received Your voice mail from YesterdaY, indicatin9 that Chad Coles needs to
give approval to the revised section before you would approve the Design
Deviation. Please let me know at your earliest convenience if we have provided all
the information Chad would need to make that determination. Thank you.
Sincerely,
CLC ASSOCIATES INC.
o I
~ Susan Murphy
Project Manager
sm
enc.
:~ryby s ~ ~ ' 2:-ae,• a
„'x~ n` .?c -
CV: file
S~ 1. 4~.Ovy~ •
: -
Planning '
Engineering f > : ~
:f Architecture ~V 'Landscape Architecturei~Lanci Surveying k ~
i~
jI ~ ~ ~i
. co
. 0
0
- ~
NORTHWEST
~
SOILS, TEST/NG & INSPECT/ON
Apri16, 2001
STI W.O. # C-70-S000194
CLC Associates, Inc.
707 W. 7' Ave.
Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
Attn: Ms. Susan Murphy
Re: Hanson Center East
Curb and Gutter Base Evaluation
Dear Ms. Murphy,
As you requested, we are submitting to you our soil analysis, opinions, and
recommendations regarding the proposed elamination of the planned crushed rock below the curb and gutter for the above-reference project. The current proposal is to eliminate
the crushed rock from below the curb and gutter. The curb and gutter would be poured
directly on the native soils.
w - Soil sampled from the Hanson,Center East site as part of the analysis is representative of
that found on the project. A sieve analysis was performed in accordance with ASTM C-
136 test method. The results indicate that the native material consists of fairly clean, well
graded gravel with silt and sand (GW-G1V) as shown on the attached laboratory report.
The gradation is fairly typical of the Garrison Gravel deposits. The attached laboratory
report also has the upper and lower limits for top course as defined in the Washington
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications Section 9-03.9(3) for crushed
surfacing. The data shows that the native soils have a similar grain size distribution as
the crushed surfacing.
Based on the data obtained, it is our opin.ion that the native soils will provide adequate
support for the curb and gutter and will exhibit performance characteristics similar to the
crushed rock. However, the native soils contain cobbles and boulders which could affect
the curb and gutter if present in the subgrade. We recommend that all particles in excess
of 3 inches be removed and replaced with a 1- to 2-inch bedding of on-site screened fines
over the native subgrade. The screening process will reduce the potential for the curb
machine to ` jump" during tritnming and placement.
Provided the planned curb and gutter is placed on material having the properties as tested
in this report, the planned curb and gutter should perform as expected for its intended
service life. This analysis only pertains to non-traffc bearing curb and gutter, with all
driveway approaches constructed on an appropriate crushed rock base.
3628 E. Ferry • Spokane, WA 99202 • Phone (509) 534-9711 • Fax (509) 534-9755
r _
. - '
,
s CLC Associates, Inc. STI W.O. #C-70-S000094
Hanson Center East April 6, 2001
STI Northwest Page 2
REMARKS
Services performed by the geotechnical engineers for this project have been conducted in
a manner consistent with that level of care ordinarily exercised by members of the
profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time restraints. No
warranty, expressed or implied, is made. The content of this report and supporting
documents are for the exclusive use of addressee.
Please give me a call at 534-9711 should you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
STI Northwest
w
. ° . o
. h
LuG~ ~
~
Bruce A. Howard
Vice President
EXPIRES:
4Ne .
Geote chnical Engineer
Attachment: Grain Size Analysis Curve
eUbah/ptn/ckb j:ldocuments\2000\s100-s1991s0001941c&gbase
. ~
1 L ~ :
U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN U.S. SIEVE NUN[BERS ~ HYDROMETER ~
~ 6 4 3 2 1.5 1 112 318 3 4 6 810 14 16 20 30 40 so 60 100 140 200
100
95 --T---- --T---- .
90
~
G
SJ - -
80
~
75 ~ -'-.~-L- -'1__,-
~
70 ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~
i
65 ' - ' - '
~ ~ -T--
~
-r -z- -r----
~ 60 ~ - ~ ~ - ~
~
-
55 -
m 1 I \ I I I
1 1 \ I I I
Z 50 ~ ~ - ~
~
LL
~F- 45 ~ -----j- --1----
Z
W
V
_t____
x 40 -
w
a
35 ' ~
~
30 ; - ~
~
25 ' - ' - '
~
I 20
~
~
15 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 1 1 I 1
1 I 1 ~ \ 1 1
I I 1 ~ 1 1
10 ~
5 --y---- ~ -----1 ~
~
0, ~ ~ ~ - ' ~
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
~
COBBLES GRAVEL ~ SAND SILT OR CLAY ~
coarse I fine I coarse I medium I fine
Specimen Identification ~ Description of Materiai ~ LL ~ PL I PI ~ Cc ~ Cu
1 583 1.0 ~ GP-GM - Poorly Graded Gravel with Silt and Sand 1 11.44 111.23
m ~ LOWER LIMIT 1.0 1 1 0.66 115.041
~ I UPPER LIMIT 1.0 1.59 138.22
1
1
Specimen Identification ~ D100 ~ D60 ~ D30 D10 ~%Gravel ~%Sand ~%Silt I %Clay
• 1 583 1.0 ~ 25.4 ~ 7.354 ~ 2.637 0.655 ~ 54.6 ~ 38.1 ~ 7.3
o m ~ LOWER LIMIT 1.0 ~ 19 ~ 7.172 ~ 1.507 ~ 0.477 ~ 50.0 ~ 50.0 ~ 0.0
UPPER LIMIT 1.0 ~ 19 ~ 2.867 I 0.584 ~ 0.075 ~ 30.5 I 59.5 ~ 10.0
I I I I I I I
~ I I I I I I I
~
~
a GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Q
~
~ Project: Hanson Center East
~ Location:
~ JWTff NORTHWEST Number: C-70-S000194 ~
~
. ~ ~f ~
~ ~ ; ( ' , ~ ~
3 3 C C ~ C
~ ' 37' 37' ' ~ 16 BOROER EASEMENT 16 BORDER EASEMEM
~ I
6 , 33' 33' , 6' SIDEWALK 10 SIDEWALK
PLANTING ~ PLANTING ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 10 UT1LfTY EIISEMENT , STRIP 2, 2 14 , 12 , 7 i 7' , 12 , 14 2, 2 S1RIP , ~ 10 UTIIl1Y EASEMENT
\ / '~I' P~'
~s ~ ~y~/
\ / 2.OX 2.OR 2.~ 2.OX
~ ~ ~P '~I' / \~s
1~ ~ / TYPE 'B' CURB & GUTTER ~ER ~
2' CLASS 'A' ASPHALT CONCREfE PAVEMENT, OVER 2° CL,ASS ~E' ASPHALT CONCRE~E PAVE~,IENT, OVER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD
9' CRUSHED SURFACING, COMPACTED DEPTH (COMPACTED DEPTH, W.S.D.O.T. SPEC.) PLAN A-3 ASPHALT COPfTENT 53'~ TO 6ti'~ (W.S.D.O.T. SPEC.) MATCH TO EXISTIN6 PAVEMENT SECTION.
TYPI A OSS SECTION CL
N~T TO SCALE
• / ~ j ~ "
~ ` JJ \ JI
~
'V~ • ' ~
. y • - ~ - • .
53 ~
Received From:_ CL P-, & Receipt No. 122323
Add ress: ~ , ~ - 4§~ N Date: 'tiZ" ~
' ,..f~~_~'- '•~x 6 _ - Amount Paid:
' Acct. No.:SL s
J ~ . r . , . . Sales-Tax:
' . .4:' It~ . i ~ ; s ':1~' - ' , ~O
, Amt. of Acct: -MqneyT rde~-~ Total Paid
~ : ~ _
~ Amt. Paid
;
~ Balance Due: j~,[ 6~ ~r ~ Ex ~ a •
j PUrpOS£:
1...?~O • ~ f - ~ - . . - . . . . '
~ . :.1 . . , ,~~'r '
Received by:
r
4/09/O1 1253 ~ 30.00 .00 30.00
~
CLC ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ 1253
FARMStS &MERCHANIS . ► .
707 W. 7th AVENUE, SUITE 200 ~ '
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 Sprague & Argonne Office
(509) 458-6840 ~ Spokane, WA 99212 :
,
98-574/1251 ,
April 9, 2001 $*********30.00 :
.
**~***~*~***~**********~******************~******Thirty dollars and no cents '
rHE Spokane County Engineers
)ER r .
~ ~ i .
AUTF4flRIZEO SIGNATURE ~
~
. . . . . . ~
,
ii•00 12 5 311' 1: L 2 5 L O S ? 4 Li: L 0 1 40 L 5 913 6II'
VV Vl ~JJV V.!•.J✓ CJ11JV`-r1.! VG1JV`-11`~YJGIJCJJI'~
~ • ,
• , - V01
4~C", y~~
,
~1, SPOKANE COUIiTY HEARiNG EXAMINE~ COt~r~ItTEE
FIMOINGS ~ OROCR
O1lTE: NovembQr 19, 19$5
:
RE: PE-1504-85. SUI.LIVAN PARK CENTER ;
ZE-180-78, Restricted InQustri.al to B-2', 8-3, I-1 & GA (Requested
zoni ng wi i 1 be i n ef fect on effecti ve da~te of revi sed Spokane County
Zoning Code). ;
,
1. That the proposal is d mixed-use development bn a?.26 acres site.
Inciuded are a 79 acre regional shopping cen~er, 19 acres of other
commercial use, 22 acres oF business park, 5 acrPs of industrial park, a
300 room hotei and a remai ni rtq 43 acres of rgadways and open space. The
devel opment wi 11 be aCCOmpI i shed through the lsubdi visi on of the property
as shown on the applicant's site deYeTopmentlplan of 42 lots, rezoning of
the property consistent with the adopted 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code.
~
1'he review of thi s project Ts further consi stent wi th the site development
plan review requirements estdblishecf with th~ Restricted Industrial zoning
of the property in 1981. The project sponso has indicated that the full
devei opment of the si te wi 11 take approximatejy 1$ years Lo accompl i sh.
1
2. That the proposal is located north of Interstate 90 on either side of the
Su11 i van Road i nterchange. The si te southea~st of the Spokane Ri ver
occupi es porti ons of Secti ons 10, 11, 12, 131 & 14, Townshi p 25rt, Range 44
E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. ~
~
3. That the i tem has been properly adverti sed s n accordance wi th state and
local re9ulations. The Committee first too~ testimony for a scheduled
hearing on Ottober 24, 1985 at khich time i I was brought to the
Commtttee's attention that approzimately thlee property owners had not
recei ved personal mai 1 noti fi cati on of the proposal. The Commi ttee •
continued the public hearing to November 151 1985 to allow the sponsor to
renoti fy al 1 property owners wi thi n400 ft, ! of the proposai and afforded
al l i nterested parti es an opportuni ty to te s' ti fy an~i express thei r
concerns vr objeCtions to Lhe proposal, a cbrrection to the iegal notice
for the November 15, 1985 hearing was made ~o.reflect that a Supplemental
Environmentai Impact Statement had been pre ared rather than the earTier
noti ce whi ch i ndi cated a- DtIS had been i ssue~ for thi s project.
1
4. That the Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee spent t~ro ddys tonsi deri ng publ i c
testimony on Sullivan Park Center. Publ1c estimony regarding the project
focused most attention upon the project's ;tential impact to existing
wi ! dl i fe i n the Spokane Ri ver Ecosystem adjp i ni n9 the property to the
north and the adverse impacts of the high traf Fic volumes which will be
generated from the project whert it is fully developed. ?hese impatts
include noise, high exhaust, and inconvenience for area residents.
Additional concerns considered by the Conmittee were that the proposed
development wds an unnecessary comercial development and could pose an
adverse impaCt upon existing busjnesses on!Sprague and elsewhere in the
County. ~
11UV-KJ7-1J7V C1J•JJ YJ11JC.!`-1J ►JG1JV`1'-CJG1✓CJJ1`~ ~,,,•~J
• ~ 1 `J- /
;
, F1 ndi ngs & Order f or PE-1504-85 (Cont' d)
~
The Committee did receive testimony favorab e tv the project which
indicdted that th15 deveiopment would estab zsh more jobs and credte an
enhanced economy for the Yaliey. That the ~vmittee heard from the Board
of Directors for The Walk In The Wild Zoo tlat they were generaily in
favvr of the proj ect i n that i t woul d enhanle thei r exposure-to the
general pub1iC. ,
;
5. That the Comprehensive Pyan designates thislarea as Industriai and the
proposal is consistent with the iand uses ibentified in this category.
b. That the Cnmmittee finds.the proposal is si6nificantly buffered from most
residential uses in the Yalley in that to tie south of the property iies
the Interstate freeway and a natural ridgeline elevated above the freeway
on the freeNay's southern border. To the north of the site lies the
Spokane River, the Kaiser Trerttwood Works ~d further to the east the
Spakane Industrial Park. I
Two areas which have some large lot residential development abutting the
property Nere considered by the CQmnittee. Qne area lies generally on the
east side of the project, ad,jacent and easierly of Flora., the other area -
lies to the southwest of the project gener lly parallel to Indiana Avenue
as it currently located. The Committee fi ds that these residential areas
are deserving of protection through s1te-b ffering and restrictions to the
development which the sponsor has agreed ti in his preSentations.
1. 1'hat the provi si ons of the State Envi ronme~tal Pol i cy Act. Chapter 43.21C
RCw, WAC 197-11 and the Spokane Environmen~al Ordi nance, Ti tl e 11 of the
Spokane COunty Code have been met and more~ parti cul arly : ;
a} By document issued January 8, 1985 by Wall is D. Hubbard-, Planning
Oi rector, the Su11 ivan Park Center PF~I S, Yol umes 1 and 1(9I80 ) and FEIS (2/81) are recognized as adoVted by reference pursuant to WAC
191-1 1-600 (4 ) and Sokane Environment41 Ordinance 11.20.230.
b) By document signed January 8, 1985 b Wallis D. Nubbard, Planning
Di rector, a Qetemi nati on of Si gni f i ance a»d'Request for Conments
and on scope af a Supplemental EIS w s issued for modification to the
original site plan,, a preliminary pl t and zone reciassifications.
C) Yhe dbove doCUments were circulated onsistent with HAC 191-11-408 .
and public notice given consistent Kjth WAC 197-11-510 and Spokane
Environmentat Ordinance 11.10.134.
d) The Oraft Supplemental EIS was scoped, drafted, issued, circuiated,
reviewed, revised and a final Supple~ntal EIS issued ursuant to WAC
191-11 and the Spokane County Envirohmental Ordinance.
e) The total ori gi fial E IS, the Suppl emental E Y S and publ i c comment gi ven
at the public hearing Nere noted and;evaluated during the dectsion.
making process, including particularily extensive information regarding habitat impacts and effectS upon flora and fauna, both
directly and indirectly. ~
. .
~ .
; .
~
1'1VV-YJ7- 1J~V v~• ,~o L'Jl1JYJti1J r/G1JKJ~il~ik'J~IJYJJI4 f,,. 04
. ~ ; ~f
. ~
~
. Findings & Order for PE-1504-85 (Cont'd)
8. That unavoidable adverse impacts to secondar~ habitat and certain fauna
are acknow)edged ds most iikely a consequenC of rhe ori9inally improved
R--I zoning and generalized site plan. Of pa tticular note the Committee
notes comment R18 on Page 172 of the Finai E vironmental Impact Statement
for Suliivan Park Center prepared in 1981 wh~ch indicates that "it is
unlikejy that this edge would be maintained by following the 1/8th mile
criteria. Otte reason is that tne site lies ` djacent to a major freeway
interchange within the Spokane Metropolitan ~Area and is readily accessible -
to a large number of people....A second and~ore important redson is that
the site is under private ownership. Unles some government agency or
citi2ens' group purchases the site, the prelent owner Currently has the
right to develop within the confines of theiexisting zoning, regardless of
the Ecosystem boundaries. ~
r
9. That the revi sed plaR has no greater advers' impacts than the exi sti ng
approved project and most likely iess in soTfar as:
a) 7he riparian buffer-area is larger than before and will become a part
of the County's Spokane River riparian'park system.
b) The present proposdl will be hooked to aredwide sewering, thus
eliminating the threat to the Aquifer from on-site sanitary waaste
disposal. !
C) The present proposal will have less carbon monoxide pollution than
projected by the origina] EIS. i
d) Slightly less traffic Wili be generateld by the present proposal when
compated to the exi sti ng approved propfosdl attd the projeCted traffiC
ldOd wiil be handled more efficiently and effectively.
e) 1he stormwaer runoff treatment by grass percolation areas has been
proven to be acceptabl e treatment for protecti on of the Aqut fer.
;
10. NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 191-11-680(5), Noti~e is hereDy given that in
conjunction with final approval vf the abole reference matter that: •
a). The time limit for commencing SEPA apoeal of the approval of the
above referenced matter, as provided tby county ordinance, is 30
calendar days.from final execution ofithe above Findings and Order.
b). The time frame for appeal ing any SE.PA'i ssues wi th respect to the
approvdl of the above referenced mat4r is 30 days after the
execution of the above Findings and Order.
s
c). The appeal of either the approval of the above referenced matter or
any SEPA issues may be filed in the 4okane County Superior Court or
a court of competent jurisdiction as;provided by law.
d). That decisions of the Spokane County;Nearing Examiner Committee
become pFi nal" unl ess appeal ed wi thi ri 10 days of the Comi ttee
written decision. ~
e). Detisions renCered by the Board of C~unty Commissioners are final when the Board S1gns its FindTngs an Order.
. .
; .
i
. ~ . .
.
irvv-~7-1770 u7•~O ~11J~ti1J ~G1J~tilti~G1~~J1ti
• 7'';
~
. ` ~ • i _
~
- Findings & Order for PE-1504-95 (Cont'd) ;
~
11. That the Committee notes that a project proposing similar uses as are
currently Under consideration was dpproved t~t March of 1981. ThaL aCtion
rezoned the property to Restricted Industrlai under the Zoning Ordinance
for Spokane County which is sttll in effect. Although the previous action
provided for a zone reclassification, the C ittee finds the current
proposai with its extensive ldndscapin9 prov'sions, road network
improvements and provisions for pubiic sewe ing to represent a substantial
improvernent over the project as prevlously qonsidered.
l
12. The Camni ttee notes the Spokane Ri ver Ecosy 'tem i s an important natural
feature which includes open fields, grassiards and some ponderosd pine and i s a wi 1 dl ife hdh i tat for various wi 1 dl i fe incl uding bi rd spec i es and
small mammals. The Committee believes the ripdrian park proposal wi11
bring•about a conttnued habitat for some ofEthese animals and will in all
likelihood prevent some of the existing manmade degradation to the
riveroank as was testified ta by the Spokane County Parks Director. This
degradation included substantial motorcyCjeland camping use along the
riverbank as Nell as large amounts of trashileft by persons using this
area of the ri ver. ~
;
The project has been designed consistent wi` the state and locai
rovisions of the Shorejines Mand ement Ac ontdined in RCw 90.58 and the
local Shorelines Management Plan for Spoka le County.
,
13. That the Committee f i nds the necessary uti ii ty and publ i c i mprovements
necessary to support this project have beer, provided for in County staff
recommendations and have been agreed to by.the sponsor. These .
improvements will cduse the project to ser4e the 9eneral public health,
safety and wel fare. ;
14. The Committee understands that certain env`ronmenLal changes will occur, but this was understood when the initial c ncept Nas approvnd in 1981.
The Committee believes the benefits from is project will outweight any
adverse impacts. '
i
15. The Comni ttee recei ved a peti ti on from ar a resi dents i ndi cati ng only that
they were opposed to Sullivan Park Center The petition did not indicate
why or how those who si gned i t fel t the ploj ect woul d have an a4Yerse
impact to them. ~
16. Testimony was proposed to the Committee regarding the project sponsor's
acti vi ties i n other juri sdicti on-Nhich tht Congni ttee decl i ned to hear.
The Conmi ttee fel t such testimony*was not,rel evant to the project
currently being heard and the Committee had the necessary powers to insure
that the project was property conditi onedl and carri ed out i n the publ i c
. interest. : . t
,
. j
;
~ . .
VV-~7~LJJV ~7•Ji ~jjJ~ylJ ~G1J~ti1~~G1J~J14
r . eb
'
- Fi ndi ngs & Order for P£-1 St?4-85 (Cont' d) ~
. i
CONGLUSIONS AND OROER '
~
The Nearing Examiner Com:nittee pursuant to the ove findings conCludes that
the application of preliminary plat PE-1504-85, SUII.IVAN PARK CENTER and. Zone
Change ZE-180-78 from Restricred Industrial to 8~2, B-39 I-1 & GA be 'APPROVEO
as conditioned in accorddnce with the Conditions of Approval attached hereto.
,
V OTE: Unanimously approved ;
~
THE NEARjNG EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY
An'ESTS To THE ABavE FiNDiNGS ANo
CONCLUSI~N AND VOTE.
. airper.'
C
f.~•i.,..t i • i~
, • ~
` • .
AT7E :
;
~ ,4.,4,4C -6. f q~ 5 .
. 5 ; DATE
Spokane County Subdivision Administrator ~
• ~
~
i
. ~
;
. ~
;
. ;
;
.r
i
t
t
V~ VJ ~ JJV VJ' JV11JV11/ VL~.lV1L1Vf~iJVJ1'~ rtei (
, ' \ I ( !s` \ ~
• • \ ` ^ . _ i
. PE41504-85, SULLIVAN PaRK CENTER IN REFERENCE 70 7NE ATTACHED FINOINGS & pRDER, THE HEARING EXaMINER COMMITTEE
PLA ONS I OF APP Rff7U- A :
l. That the below listed conditions of ali De artlnents and Agencies are
binding upon the applicant, owner(s) of th~ property, heirs, successors
or assigns, i
COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,
. ~
2. The preliminary plat of record approval isffor the property legaliy
described in the application for this pro+al. 3. Yhat the final plat(s) or phases be design~d substantially in conformance
with the preliminary plat of record as leghlly described and advertised.
Nowever, the Subdivision Administrator may grant adninistrative approvals
for divisions of land as provided-by State law or local ordinance
provided such divisions are consfstent witn the concept plan.
. ~
4. The Spokane County Subdivision Administrat~or shall review any proposed
Fi nal P` at to i nsure compl i ance wi Lh the F•indings and Condi ti ons of the
Spokane County Fieari n~ a ner ommi ttee.~ A11 fi nal pl ats shal 1
~a se~tbdck ~ rom the or~di nary hi gh water mark pursuant
to t he S hore l ilre-Mana emen t Ac t.
5. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3)
years to November 1, 1988. The applicant may request an Extensivn of
Time by submitting a written request forty-five (45) days prior to the
above expiration date.
,
6. Upon fi i i ng the Fi nal P1 at the zone chanqe of the Fi nal P1 at area shal1
be finalized and the ezisting Agricultura and Restrzcted Industrial zone
classifications shall be in accordance wi h the zoning concept plan. .
7. P~j~~~Rna~l:i~~~on~*►o~a~y~par~L~:o►f~tt►~, to" .
~tt~ern■r•a~j~i~r-oaidmi•iones• - hroushr.~t~r
b_ ' the ac.,q i agd aba~ndon d ~s- ~ocra _ d to t~h~e ~aor~ . o . di~
Ay-enue-a 1 o4n,g.t-ke-OLi p.a~i r~ pa k o. t h~► j~'".~i n~ P_ l a.
8. 7he a licant shall submit evidence that ~ny structures located within
the devel o~nt are compati bi ewi th ease~nt ri ghts of any yrantees of
record, i.e., transmission lines prior to building permit release.
9. Prior to the finalization of Phase I. thegeneral area shown as the
rlparian park shal't be owned and maintain d as a passive park by the
Property Owners Association to be formed y the purchasers of jots within
the project. Specific conditions, coven .ts and restrictions relating to
matlntenance and use of the park shall be ~eviewed and approved by the
Spokane County Zoning Administrator and led with the Spakane County "
Audi tor. Nothi ng wi thi n'thi s condi ti on s i 1 prohibi t the sponsor or .
. subseQuent owners from reaching agr.eemen s for the use or transfer of the
ri pari an park to Spokane County. I t i s t~,ttte i ntettti on of thi s condi ti on
to provide for regular malntenaace of thd passive park and retain it for
public use. ~
~
~
IVUV-~7-177~ ~7•JO b11Jb41J b~1J~414bC1~bJl4 N.~~
• ,
HEARING EXAMINEk COMMIYTEE CONDITIONS OF APPROY l., NOVEM6ER 15, 1985
P E- 504-85 , SULL IYAN PARK CENTER
YI. CONOITIONS OF Ai'PROVAL (Cont'd) t
Planning Oepartment (Cont'd) ~
,
10. Yhat the planting and maintendnce of the 1'mited acCess areas shown as
Open Space at the Sullivan Road/I-90 interthange and south of Indiana
shall be provided by applicant or successots consistent with road
1 andscapi ng requi reraents of Spokane County, and the State of Washi ngton.
~
11. The apen space plantings and maintenance a the proposed Evergreen
interchange shall be provided by the appli ant or successor at the time
the interchange is established.
~
12. The bou]evard treatrnent landscaping for Inldiana will be established or
provided for as part of Phase I finalizatian by the appliCdrlt or
suCGessors. ~
~
13. Yhat a Fi ndl t'l at name be i ndi cated before,t the f i nal pi at i 5 f i 1 ed; such
name to be approved by the County Assessoi and the Pianning staff.
14. That appropriate utility easements be ind4cated on copies of the approved
preliminary plat, for distribution to the County Planning Department,
Utt 1iti es pepartment, Engineeri ng Department, Heal th Di strict and
appl icabl e uti 1 i ty compani es. Wri tten apiroval of sai d uti 1 i ty easements
by sai d uti 1 i ty compani es must be received wi th the submi ttal of the
final plat.
15. That a current certi ficate of ti t1 e be fu~ni shed the County P1 anni ng
Department pri or to f i 1 i ng the fi nal pl at •
. 16. That the provisions ot SEPA'S NOTICE OF ATION pursuant to Chapter
43.21C.060 RCW be initiated by the projec applicant within thirty (30)
days of final dispositlon of this applica ion, and prior to any on-site
improvements unl ess the appl t cant( s)/spon or(s) c~oose to f i 1 e a
notarized waiver of Notice of Action Nith the Spokane County Planning
Oepartment. ; 17. A speci f i c 1 andscape pl an, pl anti ng schedt,l e and provi si ons for
maintenance acceptable to the Spokane Co ty Zoning Administrator sha11
be submitted with a performance bond for ots to be developed prior to
release of building permits. E
18. That a lan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire
protectlon be.approved by the Mater supp ier, fire protection district, ,
Spokane County 8ui ldi ng 8 Safety Departm nt and County heal th
authorities. 7he agencies will certify In the WATER PLAN, prior to the f i 1 i ng of the fi na1 pi at or any phase of !the prel imi nary pl at that the
plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The
WATER PLAN and certification r+ill be dratted on a transparency suitable
for reproduction.
~
~
..~...~.~~-..~~a..~..~.~ r,e17
• ( \
l
_ HEARING tXAMINER COMt-tITTEE CONDITIONS UF 09ROY NOYEMpER 15, 1985
AE-1'SO4-85, SULLIVAtJ PARK CENTER
~
VI. CONOITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont' d)
. ~
Planning Oepartment (Cont'd) `
The purveyor will also certify that approp iate contractual arrangements
and schedule of improvements have been mad with the plat sponsor for
consLruCtion of the water system in accord nCe with the approved wATER
PIAN. The time schedule wili provide for ompletion of the water system
anG inspection by the appropriate health a thorities prior to application
for building permits within the finai plat~ The arrangements or
agreements will include a provision holdin Spokane County and the
purveyor harmless from claims by any lot p rchaser refused a building
- permi t due to the fail ure of the pl at spon~sor to sati sfactori ly compl ete
the approYed water system. ~
i
The plat sponSOr Shall aj5o sign the WATER PLAN to confirm the
Contractual arrangements or agreements.
TEe f i nal pl at dedi cati 0n wi l l contai n th fol l owi ng statemenL: "the
P blic water system, pursuant the WATER P N approved by County and State
lepartment, a3 th authori ti es, the 1 ocal fi re di s tri t, County 6ui 1 di ng b Safety
and water purveyor, will be i stalled with3n this plat, and
e subdividerlsponsor will provide for i dividual domestic xater service
weli as fire protection to each iot pr or to sale of each lat and
t or to issudnce of a bui 1 di ng Perrni tfo each i ot."
•
19. That no occupancy permit will be issued for any lot within the Final Plat
unti 1 certi f i ed by aWashi ngton State i i c nsed engi neer "that the water
system has been installed pursuant the ap roved WATER PLAN for the Final •
P1at", signed and stdmped by said enginee . The certification may be in
the form of a 1 etter but i s pref erred to ~e certi f i ed on a copy of the
WATER PLAN ds a SChematic map showing the "As 8uilt" water system.
20. Approval by the Zonirtg Administrator of a(specific lighting and signing
plan for the described property prior to xhe release of any building
permits. .21. Yhe applitant shall develop subject prope ty generally in accordance
witflin the conCept preSented to the Heari g Examiner Cortmittee.
Yariations Nhen approved by the Zoning Ad inistrator will be permitted,
i ncl udi ng, but not 1 imi ted to the fol 1 owi g changes: Bui 1 di ng i ocati on ,
1andscdpe plans, and general allowable u s of the permitted zone. A1l
variations rnust conform to regulations s t forth in the 1986 Spokane
County Zonictg Code. 7he ori gi nal i ntent ;of the devei opment pl ans shal l .
be maintained. ~
; 22. Al l mi ti 9ati ng measures set forth i n the iF t nal EI S be Compl i ed wi th and
has been agreed fio by the applicant, i
,
23. That the projeCt is subject to the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of
the Spokane County Ordinance, which setsiforth various measures for
Aquifer protection; specificaily, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spiil protection measures and stormwater runoff.
c
N
• _ ~ ~ I ~ ~
. ~
l.
~
.
.N►+.o.., ' : ~ -
~ . )Wd Nvmmns ~
. ~
` ~C • ~ y ~
o,
of
.
r
/
1
~
~
I ~
~ , .
~ . .
`
~ , :
.
~
i ~1
,
~ ~ ~ i,:
~.b; ~ . • . , i:
. _ . • ~ , t t,
~1 J ~
~I V
. , ,
3 ~ ~..1 . ~ _
~ I 1 ~r
~d 1
,
a
ti,
~ ~
aror xrnrrTrrs
IN ~
1~3Nf 77f ~ , .
2 r fc"
. _
r • ti^ ~ ..ti. . - . . . . . .
~ r' '~.~..rf`r~-r _ 1•~ r ^ . . .
. , t' •
1~~ . III1 1~ '
Y._
• n• ` ~'uµ d~
,1 k i i ~rid~ ~ ~ J, •
r1i~ , , I
0-0
1'Z,• a~W,.
~.,,•,f'~ /
~ ! .
~ COIANIERCIAL CONCEPT INDUSTHIAL PARK CONCEPT
. BUSINESS PARK CONCEPT ~ ~ / / ~
~ ---~;~;a ~t~.,~ ~ ~
► ~ ' ~ ,r'' ' ,r , '
r+i ~..1!'~ . ~ ` ~~y►~+ _ `
--~IT~~• n~ ~ • 1 1 ~ , ~ ~ W
U~ , ~ ~ _ ~~•Q y : si„ . Y' 1 : i('
• .~r . ~ ~ : ~ r _ ,r ~ ~ ' y ' 1
s • ~ , t`=1,"~ ~
= ~ ' ~ r ~c•,;, ~ - _ ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ •
' ; , ~ . 1 ` , . • ~Q •~~~~•~:L'~~ 1
II , , N,~,.
• ' ' ~ M ' ' ' a.ti.. 1. I~
~ ' ` 1 ' , I r •i (i~~., ~
( . ~ t
~
. I
~ lLU1STRATIVE OEVELOPMENT PLAN ~
SULLNAN PARK - CMTER
Spok" Cmhr, Wfthgton ~ consultant: wisey ~ Ham
c ~
,
~
~~~v v~•v~ ~ii~~~i~ VG1J~~1ti~GiJ~JlH r.lb
' I
, NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONOITiUNS OF APPROV L. NOVEMBER 15, 1985 PE- 504-85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER
Y I. CONDI TI ONS OF A?N ROVAL (Cont' d)
!
~
County Engineer Department (Cont'd) ;
24. The applicant shall provide sight-obscuring cyclone fencing 6 ft. in .
height along the southerly borders of Lotsl through 9 of the prei imi nary
plat and along the westerly edge of Lots 10 and 11 which adjoin
. properties not within the development. Ad~itionally, Lhe applicant shall
provide a 6 ft. sight-obscuring fence alon Lot 27 in the area which has
been indicated by the applicant in a site lan amendment to be dedicated
as non-developable. This area is approxim.tely 500 ft. wide extending
westerly of F1 ora Road.
COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT ;
1. That condi ti onal approval of the pl at i s 9p ven sub j ect to dedi cati on of
Ri ght-of-Way and approval of the road syst.t~m as i ndti cated i n the
preliminary plat of record.
2. That pians, prafiles, and cross-section5 a~ designed to County standards
showing proposed street centerline and cu grades be submitted to the
County Engineer for approval prior to con ruction andlor the filing of
each final plat; road plans to be-prepare under the direction of a
licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
L~,~'prior That drainage plans and design calculati ns showing the alignment of
arai nage faci 1 i ti es be submi tted Lo the C~unty Engi neer for approval
to construction and/or the filing of each final plat. Orainage
plans to be prepared under the direction f a licensed Professional Civil .
Engi neer.- .
4. That the regulations of the Nativnaj Fiooa Insurance Program be observed
since the proposed plat is affected by aq1ood Hazard Zone.
5. That aPproPridte provisions be made that ihe following descrjbed property
be held in trust until the continuatton o~ the streets be dedicated or
deeded: a 1-ft. strip at the ends vr edges of all streets that terminate
or border the f i na1 pl at boundary. .(Temp rary cul de sacs are requ i red
r,hen streets termi nate at the plat bounda i es. ) _
4
. 6. 1,'building statement must appear in the dedicatory ianguage of the final plat:
hat,indiYidual driveway access pe~'+~its oe required prior to issuance of
permi t fvr dri veway approachesl to the County road system."
'
7. statement shal l be p1 aced i n pl at dedi c~ti on that no direct access be
~llowed from lots to Sullivan Road. ~ . ~
8. That all public roads within the plat be designed and constructed to
Spokane County standards. : . .
~
;
I
••v~ v- - r- v v~•.~~ V11✓V~1✓ VC1JV'71`HCJG1../CJ.l1"r.11
(
, • t`~ ; ~
. ' ~
HEARING EXAMiNER COhU4ITTEE CONOIYIONS OF APPROVAL, NqVEMBER 159 1985
PE-' SO4-85, SULLIYAN PaRK CENTER
VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROYAL (Cont`d)
~
County Engineer Department (Cont'd) ~ ~9. That the sponsor shall prepare and Submit o the County Engineer a design
' proposal acceptable to the State Nighway 0 partment of the proposed State
Nighway-County Road intersection. State N'ghway Oepartment approvai of
the proposed design must be received prio to the filing of the final
pl at. Icnprovements to the State Hi ghway e to be the responsi bi 1 i ty of
the sponsor and may either be constructed r a bond to cover the cost of
such improvements furnished to the County ngineer in the amount as
determined by the County Engineer and the tate Highway Department. This
shall include both Phase I and Phase II d signs.
xe That the appl i cant sha11 coordi natE wi th Ihe Spokdne County Parks and
Recreation Department and the County Engineer`s Departrnent to provide a
bicYcle Pathway throu9h the northern portionof the project paralleling
the Spokane River. This pdthway would be provided in lieu of bicycle
lanes aiong the proposed arterial streets .
11. That access to Evergreen Road from parcel x 12, 15, 16 and 17 i s
prohibtted.
12. That the applicant stiall submit to the Cobnty Engineer an intersection
pl an for the Evergreen-l ocal acc.ess road : ocated south of Indi ana. .
13. The proposed pldt shall be improved to thg standards set forth in Spokane
County Bodrd of County Commissioners Resolution Ho. 80-1592, as amended,
which established regulations for roads, ~pproaches, drainage and fees in .
new construction.
~
14. That pri or to f i ndl i zati on of the propos p1 at, the appl i cant shal 1
submit to the County Engineer for review nd approval "Typical" Roadway
Cross Sections for the following propose roadways:
~.a. Indiana Avenue Sullivan to the propqsed Evergreen intersection.
~ b. Indiana Avenve from the prvposed Ev rgreen intersection to the
connection with the existing Indian Avenue at the west end of the
proposal.
~
NC. Evergreen aoad south of Indiana Avenue, between Indiana and the
proposed Evergreen interchange.
,
Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road~ to the easterly terminus. r
15. The typical roadway cross section for th roadway which connects the
proposed Evergreen Road with the propose Indiana avenue in the westerly
porti on- o f the pl a t shal l be tYpical roa ay secti on No. 1 access
standard. !
;
16. That the typical roadway cross section or the cul-de-sac which is
llivan Road and exte~ds southeasterly from Indiana
proposed east of Su
Avenue shall be typical roddway seCtiort No. 1 aCGess standard.
.
vvv-~~ 1JJV ~~•~v ~11'~y1J ~G1J~tily~Gl~~~14 r.l~
.
. • . / _
-~i
HEARING tXaMtNER COMMiT'tEE CONOiTIONS OF APPROVaL, NONEM4ER 15, 1985 .
' PE--1504-85, SUILIYAN PARK CENYER
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd)
~
Cou ty Engineer Department (Cont'd) ~
I -
17. That prior to recording of the final plat, the Burlinyton Northern
Rai 1 road li ne which runs through porti ons Tf the proposal on both the
east and west sides of Sullivan Road, shali be abandoned or reiocated.
rior to release of a buildin9 permit for those portions of the proposal
identified as Phase I, the applfcant sha11:
18. Obtain permits for roadway construction fr~ the appropriate state and
county agencies (Spokane County Engineer).
19. Improve the Sullivan Road Intersection in manner consistent with the
approved pl ans and -as set forth f n the sup~l emental Envi ronmental Impact
Statement.
20. Construct those roadways rrhich are identi ied in the supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement as being n cessary in order to accanmodate traffic volumes which wi11 be generated bPhase I., Construction shall
be in conformance with Lhe dpproved roadw plans and typical roadway
cross-sections. -
Roadway construction must be completed prior to the release of buitding
perrnits or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Ensineer to-cover
the cost of construction improvements, co struction certiftcation, .
"as-built" Plans, and monumenting the str~et centerline shall be filed
wi th the County Engi neer. •
21. Construct a connection to the existing In iY ana Avenue which is located to
the south and wpst of the westerlY bounda~ of the proposed plat. It
sha11 be the apclicant's responsibility to obtain the necessary
right•of-Nay alignment for this connectio . This connection must provide
for a smooth transition between the exist'ng Indiana avenue and that
rvhi ch i s proposed ai thi n the Q1 at. The ansi tion al i gnment shal l be
reviewed and approved by the County Engin er. The County Engineer wi11
provide assistance during riyht-of-way n otiations should it be
necessary. ~
t
22. Construction within the proposed public treets and easements shall be
performed under the direct supervision o a licensed engineerlsurveyor,
who shall furnish the County Engineer wi "as-built" plans and a _
certificaLe in v+riting that all improvem nts were insta;led to the lines
and grades shown on the approved construltion plans and that all
disturbed monuments have been r.eplaced.
23. 7he applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer
and the Spokane County Health Wstrict aldetailed combined on-site sewage
system plan and surface water disposal plan for the proposed bullding
site prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property.
. `
~
,
~
i~UV-~7'1770 ~7•~~ ~11J~41J ~G1J~y14~G1~~J14 r.lJ
' • ' ` ~
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITYEE CONOIYIUNS OF AaPROV~L, NOVEMBEK 15, 1985
PE- 504-85, SUILIVAN aARK CENTER
Y1. CONOITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) c
~
~
County Engineer Qepartment (Cont'd) 24. A parking plan and traffiC circu3ation pla for proposed building sites
shall be submitted and appraved by the Spo ane County Engineer prior to
the issuance of a building permit on the p operty. The design, location,
and arrangement of parking stalis shall b in accordance with Standard
traffic engineering practices. Paving or as approved by the
County Ensineer, will be required for any ~urfacing,
ortion of the project which is
to be occupied or travelled by vehicles.
25. The construction of the road improvements stated herein sha11 be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane Caunty Engineer.
26. Al1 required improvements shall conform-t J the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Ro d and Bridge Construction, and
other appjicabie County standards and/or dopted resolutions pertaining
to Road Standards and Stormwater Manageme t in effect at the date of
construction, unless otnerwise approved b the County Engineer.
27. Roadway standards, typical roadway sectiols and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane 6oard o County Comnissioners
Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
28. Should the Pnase I development include th se portions of the property
iying east of Suljivan Road, the applican will be reQuired to construct
the Sullivan Road improvement and interch nge modifications which are
scheduled for construction in arder to ac ommodate Phase II of the •
proposal.
29. That Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road shail be constructed per the
approved p1 ans and typi cal roadway cross-ISecti on i f properti es east of
Sullivan Road are included in Phase I.
30. That the County Engineer may permit Indi na Avenue east of Sullivan Road
to function as a prtvate road providing hat the roadway is constructed
in accordance with Spokane County public road standards and in
conformance with the approved road plans and typical roadway
cross-section.
31. Thdt the applicant must obtain permits to perform wvrk in the County road
right-of-Nay from the County Fngineer, lo Hork will be performed within
the County road ri ght-of-way rn thout a p rmi t.
, . Yf Indiana Avenue edst of Sullivan Road }s to function as a private road, f then the applicant shal1 sign arid record Spokane County Noti ce to the
Public No. 4. This document provides th following:
I
~
;
I
~ .
~
f.
NUV-by-'17y~ by~~l b1150415 021Jb41402150514 P.14
, ' • ~ ~
' NEARING EXAMINER COAIMITTtE CONOITIONS Ot= MPROYAI., NOVEMBER 15, 1985
PE-1504-85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER
Y I. CONUIYIONS OF aPPROVat (Cont' d)
County Engineer Department (Cont`d)
That Spokane County has no resportsi bi 1 i ty to bui1 d, improve,
mdintdin or serviCe the private road, Should SpokaRe County be
petitioned to tonstruct or maintain a public road servin9 the .
property i n accordance wi th provi si ons RCW 36.81, the owners, thei r
heirs or assigns must agree to join an participate in the formation
of a County Road improvement project s nctioned by Spokane County.
PriYdLe roads must be Signed in accord nCe wi-th the provisions of
Spokdne COUnty. 8oard of CounLy Cornmis ioners Resolution No. 80-1592
1s amended. and constructed in conform nce with Section 3.07,
Sections A 6 8 af that title. '
33. The traffic generated by the proposed proje t wi11 have a significanL
impact upon Sullivan Road between Interstat 90 and Sprague Avenue. It
~ is antiCi ated that a two-wa left turn ldn will b de
P y e nee d to
accomodate turnirtg mavements alon9 the Spr gue to I-90 corridor. This
lef t turn ldne will be required prior to th construCtion of Phase II.
Prior to the comnencement of Phase III, it lill be necessary to improve
Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility.
. ~
The proposed Design Report for the Evergre Interchange shall also
include a review of traffic conditions alo g the Sullivan Road/I-90 corridor. The dbOve spedified roadway imp ovements shall be considei-ed
within that analysis. -
It sha11 be the applicant's responsibility to pay for the costs of '
right-of-Kay acquisition dnd roadKay impro~ements along Suliivan between
• I-90 and Sprague for PhaSe II. Should oth r land development occur along
the Sprague/I-90 Corridor which has measur bie traffic impacts (i.e.
1 arge camrnerc i ai or i ndus tri al uses ) tnen f ormul a for parti ci pa ti on i n
the sharing of costs for roadv+ay improveme ts will be deve7oped by the
County Engi neer.-- 'the formul a wi l1 cons i de the traf f i c vo1 umes generated
by Sullivan Park Center as wejl as other i entified traffic generators.
For the Phase II1 improvements, a formula or the assessment of costs
wil1 be devel oped by the County En9i neer i cooperotti on wi th Lhe
applicant. Of principal consideration in e development of the formula
will be the traffic volumes generated by is project, traffic generdted by other-prolects and other traffic utiii ing the roadway.
34. That prlor to the initiation of Phase II of the proposed deveiopment, the
applicant wi11 conduct an updated trafficfstudy. This study may be .
/ i ncl uded wi thi n the desi g» repurt whi ch wl11 -be prepared for the
~ Ever9reen Road Interchange. ;
Yhe Oesign Report shall ai5o consider the impacts upon the County Road
SyStem of the extension of a connection to Missivn Avenue from the
propose4 Evergreen Interchange. This analysis shall include potential
traffic lmpacts upon Ever9reen Road between Sprague Avenue an4 the
connection. i
~
i,
iv~v-~7-t »o ~7•til bilJ~41J ~G1J~414bG1~b'14 P.15
, • ~
HEARING EXAMiNER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF APaROYA , NOYEMBER 15, 1985 PE-1 04-85, SULI.IVAN PARK CENTER
YI. CQNOYTIONS OF APP ROVAL (Cont'd) ~
~
County Engineer Department (Cont`d)
~
PHASE II
Roadway construction and improvements for Phase 1I of the proposal shall be
consistent with the improvements which have been identified within the
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. Thase improvements are as
foi 1 oKS:
35. Construction and upgrading of the Sullivan qoad-Indiana intersection in a
manner consistent with the plans which have been improved by the Spokane
County Engineer and the State of Washingtvn Department of Transportation.
36. Construction of new freeway interchange at or near the alignment of Evergreen Road as identified frithin the Supblemental EiS.
E
37. Construction of Evergreen Road from Indian Avenue southward to the
proposed freeway interchange. Th1s roadwa shall be constructed per the
approved road plans and in conformance wit the approved typical roadway
cross-section.
38. Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed Ever9 een Road) sha11 be improved to
a fi ve-1 ane faci 1 i t f rom Evergreen Road w~steriy to the connecti on wi th
the existing Indiana Avenue. Yhis roadway shall be constructed per the
approved road p1 ans and i n conformance wi tt i the approved typi cal roadway
CrOSS-SeCt10n.
That Indiana Avenue (west of the proposed iat) must be widened to
provide additional traffic lanes in order o acComodate the trafflc
which wili be generated. A five lane faci ity is required to mitigate
the traffic impacts upon Indiana Avenue an ad3oining business properties.
A plan for the upgrade of the i ntersecti on at Pi nes and I ndi ana must be
submitted to the County Engineer as specified in condition #9.
It shall be the responsibility of the appl'cant to secure the additional
ri9ht-of•wdY for the improvement of India~ Avenue.
39. Indiana Avenue (east of Sullivan Road) sh 11 be constructed as a
five-Zane facllity from Sullivan Road to he easterly terminus of the
project. Indiana shall be constructed pe the approved road plans and in
conformance wi th the approved typi cal roa ay cross-secti on. .
. ,
40. Yhat the County Engi neer may permi t Ind1 a`a Avenue east vf Sul l i van Road to function as a private road, providin9 at the roadway is constructed
in accordnace with Spokane County Public oad Standards in conformance
with the approved road plans and typical oadway cross-section.
41. That the applicant must obtain permits to perform work in the County road
ri ght-of-way from the County Engi'neer. No work wiil be performed wi thi n
the coLnty road righi-of-way w3 thout a pekmM.
.
1 .
.vv v~ .~~v v~•~G V11JV~1J ~C1J~y14~G1J~JlH P.16
\
. NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF aPPROY , NOYEMpER 15, 1985
PE- I 04-85 , SULLIVAN PARK CEN7ER
i
YI. CONQITIONS OF APPROVAL (Cont'd) ~
,
County Engineer Department (Cont'd)
42, If Indiana Avenue east of Sullivan Road is to functian as a private road,
then the applicant shall siyn and record 5 okane County Notice to the_
Rublic No. 4. This document provides the olioxing:
That Spokane County has no responsibility to build. improve,
maintain or service the private road. Should Spokane County be
petiLioned to construct or maintain a public road serving the
property i n accordance wi th provi si on RCW 36.81 , the owners, thei r
heirs or assi9ns must agree to join a d particspate in the formation
of a County Road Improvement project anctioned Dy Spokane County.
Private roads must be signed In accor ance with the provfsions of
Spokane County 8oard of County Commis ioners Resolution No. 80-1592
as amended, and constructed in-confor ance with Section 3.07,
SeCtions A and 8 of that ti Ll e.
43. Should the Evergreen Interchange Design Re ort determine that the level
of improvements as specified within the Su lecrtental EIS are not necessary
for Phase II, then the County Engineer may approve a phased plan for
roadway construction or design deviations .or Phase II roadway
improvements.
44. That a public rodd Right-of-Wdy conneCtion sha11 be provided to •
properties which are located to the south ~nd east of Parcels #27 and #28
as depicted on the preliminary plat. This will require a redesign of the
pl at i n thi s area. -
( . .
. aHasE iii
45. The roadway improvements for Phase III id ntified within the Supplemental
EIS are the connection-from the new freew interchange at Evergreen Road
svuthward to Mission, Avenue and the possi le connections northward and
eastward of.the proposal. Yhe need for t ese improvernents will be
addressed in the development of the Everg een Interchange Design Report.
The 1eve1 of improvements, assignment of inancial responsibility for
improvements and tirning of construction 11 be determined on the basis
of traffi c vol umes , 1 ocati on of faci 1 i ti e and traffic safety rel ated
issues.
~ .
46. Phase III improvements as identified by e Desi9n Report shall be
enc.ement of~hase I II ConstruCti on.
constructed prior to the cortm
CouHTY HEALTx oi S?RICT I
1. Appropriate utility easements shall be in icated on copies of the
preliminary plat of record for distributi'n by the Planning Department to
the utility companies, SQokane County Engneer and the Spokane County
Nealth Di strict. Wri tten approral of th easements by the uti 1► ty
companies, must be received prior to the ~bmittal of Lhe final plat.
s
i
i~v-~~ 1JJV ~7•~c ~11J~~1~ ~G1J~~14~~1Jb~14 F.j7
.
, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONOITIONS OF At'PRQYA~, NOYEMBER 15, 1985
?E-1 04-85, SULLIYAN t'ARK CENTER
CONOITZONS OF APPROYAL (Cont'd)
County Heal th 0istri ct (COnt' d) 2. A tatement sha11 be pl aced i n the dedi cati ~ n to the effect that: "A
ublic sewer system will be maGe available or the plat and lndividual
rvice will be provided to each lot prior o sale. Use of individual
site e sewage system shall not be authoriz d."
•n-
3, water service sha11 be by an existing publi water supply when approved
by the Regi onal Eng i neer ( Spokane State D~parUnent of Social 8 Nedl th
Services.
4. Priar to filing the final plat, the sponso shall present evidence that
the plat lies within the reCOrded service ea. of the water system
proposed serve the Plat. The dedicator language on the plat shall
state: " e of private wells and water sy tems is prohibited."
J
5. T ~ 1at dedication will contain a stateme t to the effect that: "The
p ~ 1 i c Nater system as approved by County nd State heal th authoriti es
a d pthe local fire district and purveyor w 11 be installed within this
p t, and the subdivider wi11 provide for -ndividual domestic water
Service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot."
COUNTY UTLCITIES DEPARTMENT
1. The dedication shall state: "7he oaner(5) or successor(s) in interest
ag~ee to authori ze the County to pl ace the-'r name(s) on a peti ti on for
th~,e formation of ULID by peti tion method p rsuant to RCW 36.94 whi ch the
p~etition includes the Owner(s) property an further not to object by the
spning of a protest petition against the ormation o: a ULID by
resol uti on method pursuant to RCw Chapter 6.94 whi ch i ncludes the
ner(s) property. P ROYIOED, this conditi n shall not prohibit the
oMner(s) or successor(s) from objection t any assessment(s) on the the
A groperty as a result of improvements call for in conjunction with the
ormation of a ULID by ei ther peti ti on or esol utT on method under RCW Chapter 36.94.
2. Any water service for this project shail qe provided in accordance with the C.oordinated Water System Plan for Spoidane County, as amended.
3. Connection to the Yalley sewer system is to be made prior to reledse of
oCCUpancy permits for any struttures with n the site.
wASH I NGTON STATE DEP ARTMENT OF TRANSp ORTATI ON l. That the applicant obtain necessary appro~al from the Oepartment of
Transportation for each phase of the proj ct prior to finalization.
2. Yhat the dppliCant Submit proof to the Pi nning Oepartment file that
washinyton State Department vf Transporta ion conditions have been
sati s factori 1y handl ed pri or to fi nali za on of any portl ort of the preiiminary plat.
~vuv-r~~-1 »o y,~ k?1 TJ1~4l~ b~'1J1~414b~251~514
P. 18
, • --'r~
. • NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE CONDITIONS OF WROYA~, NOVEMBER 15, 1985
PE-1 04-t35, SULLIVAN PARK CEN7ER
YI. CONUITYONS 0F APPROYAI. (Cont`d)
County Engineer Department (Cont`d) .
That Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve,
maintain or service the private rpad. Should Spokane Caunty be
petttioned to construct or maintain a nublic road serving the
property in accordance with prov7sions RCW 36.81, the owners, their
heirs or assigns must agree to join a participdte in the formation
of a County Road improvement praject nctioned by Spokane County.
Private roads must be signed in accor ance r+ith the provisions of
Spokane County, Board af County Cammi sioners Resolution No. 80-1592
as amended, and constructed in confor ance with Section 3.07,
Sections A& B of that title.
33. The traffic generated by the proposed proj ct will have a significant
. impact upon SulliYan Road between Intersta e 90 and Sprague Avenue. It
is anti c i pated that a--two-way l ef.t turn 1 a e wi 11 be needed to .
accommodate turning movements aloRg the Sp ague to I-90 corridor. This
left turn lane will be required priar to t e construction of Phase II.
Prior to the commencement of Phase III, it will be necessary to improve
Sullivan Road to d seven lane facility.
The proposed Oesign Report for the Evergr en Interchange shall also
include a revieN of trdffic conditions al g the Sullivan RoadlI-90
corridor, The above specified roadMray im rovements sha31 be considered
within that analysis. ~
It shall be the applicant's responsibilit to pay fvr the costs of
right-of-way acquisition and roadway impr vements along Sullivan between '
- I-90 and Sprague for Phase 11. Shoul d a er 1 and development occur al ong
the Sprague/I-94 Corridor xhich has measu able traffic impacts (i.e.
large comnercial or industrial uses) then a formula for participation in
the sharing af costs for roadway improvem nts will be developed by the
County Engineer. The formul a v+i 11 consi d r the traffic vol umes generated
by Sullivan Park Center as weli as other 'dentified traffic generators.
For the Phase III improvements, a formula for the assessment of costs
wi 11 be devei oped by the County Engi neer i n cooperati on wi th the
applicant. Of principal consideration in the development of the formula
will be the traffic volumes generated by this proj ec t, traffic generated
by other projects and other traffic utilizing the roadway.
34. That pri or to the i ni ti ati on of Phase I I of the proposed devei opment, the
dpplicant wi 1] conduct an updaLed traf f i study. Thi s study -raay be
inciuded within the design report which lill be prepared for the .
Evergreen Road Interchange.
_ The Desi9n Report shalt also consider th impacts upon the County Road
System of the extension of a connection o Mission Avenue from the
proposed Evergreen Interchange. This a lysis shall include potential
traffic impacts upon Evergreen-Road be een Sprague Avenue and the
connection.
vv v~ iJJV ~7•yJ V11~~ti1J ~~1J~41ti~G1~~~1ti
P.19
. - -
•
NEARI NG EXAMI NER C OMMI TTEE COND I T I ONS Of APPROV A, NOY EMBER 15, 1985
PE-1~04-85, SULLIVAN PARK CENTER
Y I. CONOI7i0NS OF APP ROVAL (Cont' d)
WASHINGTON STATE OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLQGY 8 HISTORI~ PRESERVATIQN
1. In the event that archaeological or histor4 resources dre discovered
during project activities, the applicant or successor shall notify the
Office of Archaeojogy and Historic Preserv&tion in Olympia, Washington.
1/ ¢ l S' ~ .5" ' /son ~i~,.~~t;vOate ~ i rp~
~
. .
~ .
~
~ .
,
~
~
~
~
TOTAL P.19
i
~ ,
. .E ...,•,~:M•.! • r . . ~ : ~'0 : ' . 1. , t. .
. . .
. - - .
,
• . Y ~ r--~ ~ ;
, ' .
NO. 86-0265 ,
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMM{SSIONERS
OF SPOKAN E COU NTY, WASH I NGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRE- )
LIMINARY SUBDiV1SION PE-1504-85, ) FINDINGS OF FACT, ~
SULLIVAN PARK CENTER & ZE-180-78 ) AND DECt510N
)
SPONSOR : HANSON PROPERTI ES
THIS MATTER, being considered by the Board of County Commission-
ers of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board", of an appeal of
,
the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee unanimous decision dated No-
vember 19,- 1985, where in said Committee approved the above referenced pro-
posal subJect to certain conditions of approval.
The 6oard received an appeal application on November 27, 1985, by
Tom P. May for Estelle Miller, Evie Crossman, Richard Morgan and Tom Rogers.
The Board held a de novo public hearing on January 27 & 28, 198,56
and having fully considered all testimony presented . as weil as consjdered
Attorney Tom May's letter dated January 31, 1986, and the sponsor's response .
thereto and having individuaily acquainted themselves with the vicinity'and the
site in question, did reach a unanimous decision on February 18, 1986, to deny
the appeal and in doing so enter the following: FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the October 24, 1985, STAFF REPORT was considered as weli as the
staff presentatlon before the Board.
2. That the November 19, 1985, Hearing Examiner Committee Flndings and
Order were considered.
3. That the file of PE-1504-85 ZE-180-78 was considered by the Board.
4. That the proposal is a mixed-use development on a 226 acres site. In-
cluded are a 79 acre regionai shopping center, 19 acres of other commercial
use, 22 acres of buslness park, 53 acres of industrial park, a 300 room hotel
and a remaining 43 acres of roadways and open space. The development will be
accomplished through the subdivision of the property as shown on the
applicant's site development pian of 42 lots, re2oning of the property consistent
.A.I •~l~4:.. . . ~ ~ . . . ~".p• . ~ ~ •
• r
_ i
.
.
with the adopted 1986 Spokane County Zoning Code. It, is nbted that rezoning
at the property was not necessary, however, the sponsor desired to tie down
the proposal as much as possible, thus requiring the rezone under the ncw toning ordinance. The review of this project is further consistent wfth the site
development plan review requirements established with the restricted Industrial
ioning of the property In 1981. The proJect sponsor has indicated that the fult
development of the slte will take approximately 15 years to accompiish.
5. That the proposal is located north of Interstate 90 on elther side ot the
Sullivan Road interchange. The site southeast of the Spokane River occupies
portions of Sections 10, 11, 12, 13 dc 14, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.,
Spokane County, Washington.
6. That the proposal has been properly advertised In accordance with state
and IQcal regulations.
7. That public testimony regarding the project focused most attention upon
the proJect's potential impact to existing wiidlife In the Spokane River Ecosystem
adjoining the property Lo the north and the adverse impacts from addittonat
traffic volumes whlch will be generated from the proJect when it 1s tully de-
veloped. These impacts lnclude nolse, exhaust and inconvenience for area
residents. Additlonal conerns raised were that the proposed development was
an unnecessary commerical development and could pose an adverse impact upon
existing businesses.
8. That the proposa! is located In an area designated as I ndustrial on the
adopted Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and is withtn the Priority Sewer
Service Area (PSSA) where Spokane Valley sewers wilt be installed.
The Board f1nds the mixed commercial and industrial uses consistent with
the County Comprehensive Plan noting particularly that general guidelines and
goals anticipate mixed use development.
The proJect further is consistent with the general locatlonal guidelines of
the Comprehenslve Plan in that it is 1) located on relatively flat ground; 2)
near arteriai, freeway and rail access; 3) buffered from areas of general
resldential development; 4) the project will be served by public water and
sewer systems and will be served by a detailed traffic circulation system which
wil{ be developed In phases as traffic increases In the area.
9. That the Board finds the proposal is significantly buffered trom moat
resldentlal uses In the Valley In that to the south of the property lies the .
-2-
. - • I / ~ •
• \ 1 I1
.
Interstate freeway and a natural ridge line elevated above the freeway on the
freeway's southern border. To the north of the site lies the Spokane River,
the Kaiser Trentwood Works and further to the east the Spokane industrial
Park.
Two areas which have iarge lot residential development abutting the
property were consldered by the Board. One area lies generaily on the east
side of the project, adJacent and easterly of Flora, the other area lies to the
southwest of the project generaliy parallei to Indiana Avenuo as 1t is currently
located. The Board notes -that no building will be ailowed in the easterly 580
feet of Lot 27. This would provlde a substantial buffer to the residential
development along Flora. Additionally, the Board itnds the project currently
has no planned connection to Fiora and therefore a very limited impact on Flora
Road until other properties develop and establish an easterly connection of the
.
I ndiana road improvements. The Board finds that the southwest residentiai
area w111 be protected through site-buffering and restrictions to the develop-
ment which the sponsor has agreed to in his presentation.
10. That the provislons of the State Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 43. 21C
RCW, WAC 197-11 and the Spokane Environmental Ordinance, Title 11 of the
Spokane County Code have been met and more particularly:
a) By document jssued January 8, 1985, by Wa11is D. Hubbard,
Planning Dtrector, the Su{livan Park Center DEIS, Volumes 1 and 1
(9/80) and FEIS (2/81) are recognized as adopted by reference
pursuant to WAC 197•11-600 (4) and Spokane Environmental Ordinance
11.20.230.
b) By document signed January 8, 1985, by Waliis D. Hubbard,
Planning Director, a Determination of Significance and Request for
Comments and on scope of a Supplemental EIS was issued for
modification to the orlginal site p{an, a preliminary piat and zone
reclassifications.
c) The above documents were circulated conslstent with WAC
197-11-510 and Spokane Environmental Ordinance 11.10.130.
d) The Draft Supplemental EIS was scoped, drafted, issued, cir-
culated, reviewed, revised and a Final Supplemental EIS issued
pursuant to WAC 197-11 and the Spokane County Environmental Or-
dinance.
e) The totai original EIS, the Supplemental EIS and public comment
given at the public hearing were, noted and evaluated during the de-
cision-making process, lncluding particularly extensive information re-
garding habitat lmpacts and effects upon flora and fauna, both di- ,
rectly and lndirectly, the traffic issues, and economic analysis.
That'pursuant to RCW 43.21C.090, the Board finds that the environmental
documents prepared for the project are "adequate" especially in Itght of the
testimony at the public hearing.
.
_3_
1 ~
• , . r t
That the Board finds that the applicant has alloted approximately 17 acres of
ground adjacent the river for a riparlan park to minimiie development impacts
to the river. The riparian park will be passlve in nature, without any major
structure or playground facility.
Mr. Mosher indicated In accordance with Washington State Department of
Game guideltnes that a one eight-mile area on each side of the river was studied
In developing the Shorelines Management Classificatians given to the different
portions of the rlver.
Testimony was received that this area of the river is currently
experiencing substantfal degradation from littering, dumping and motarcycle
use. The development of a riparian park would lmprove the river area by
encouraging passive use and facilitating a tong range Park Department Plan for .
a bike trail along the river. The Board further finds that the river shcreland
is private{y owned property rather than publiciy held interest.
The Appeilants inicated that the proposal would have a significantly ad-
verse impact upon the wildlife In the area noting In particular that the area is a
bald eagie nesting area. However reports received by the Board including the
Environmenta! Impact Statement and letters from Jerry Hickman, Game Biotogist
for the Washington State Department of Game, do not support this contention.
While the Spokane River Ecosystem may be a feeding area of eagles, the site is
not indicated by Spokane County or the State of Washington as an eagte nesting
area. The Board was informed that the Board of Directors of the "Watk in the
Wiid Zoo" had passed a resolution supporting the proposal.
A It is recognized by the Board that the project wiil cause a reduction In
smali burrowing animals In the areas that are developed.
12. That the Board notes that a project proposing similar uses as are current-
ly under consideration was approved In March of 1981. That action reioned the
property to Restrlcted Industria{ under the Zoning Ordinance for Spakane
County which is still In effect. Although the previous action provided for a
zone reclassification, the Board finds the current proposat with its extensive
landscaping provistons, road network improvements and provisions for public
sewering represents a substantiai improvement over the project as previously
considered .
13. That the project has been designed consistent with the state and locai
provisions of the Shorelines Management Act contained in RCW 90.58 and the
.
-4-
~ ( • ( , ~ _ /
1 •
~local Shorelines Management Plan for Spokane County.
14. That the Board finds the necessary utility and pub{ic improvements
necessary to support this project have been recommended by County staff and
have been agreed to by the sponsor. These improvements wiil cause the
project to serve the general' public health, safety and welfare.
15. That the Board understands that certain environmentat changes wiil occur,
but this was understaod when the initial concept was approved in 1981. The
Board believes the benefits from this project will outweigh any adverse impacts.
Further, when an EIS is prepared for a project such as thts, the project may
be condittoned to mitigate specific identified adverse environmental lmpacts. The
Board finds that the conditions of approvai mittgate specific identified
environmental impacts. Additiona!!y, the Board finds pursuant to RCW
43.21C.060 that all reasonabte mitigation measures are sufficient to mitigate the
,
impacts
16. The Board received comments from the appeilants that the prior re2ontng
action for thls site, (County Planning File #ZE•180-78) was improper due to
alleged defects in the public notice. The 8oard finds that this is a legal issue
to be resolved by the court. Nowever, the Board has considered the present
proposai on its own merits, affording the sponsors as well as appellants the
ability to address all relevant issues, Including environmental.
17. The Board received comments that the commercial development of Sulfivan
Park Center will have an adverse impact on other business centers within
Spokane County. Economic considerations are one factor which may be
consldered outside of SEPA, and as such are afforded such weight as the Board
deems appropriate. The Board's policy, generaily speaking, has looked toward
approvals of maJor commerciai facilities when supported by the comprehensive
plan and public health, safety and welfare concerns and then let the free
enterprise system sort out the proposals.
18. That concern was expressed that the proposal would contribute significant
amounts of surface water discharge into the river or aquifer thereby reducing
water quaiity. 7he control of surface water disposal is carefully conditioned by
the Spokane County Engineer's Department under Board adopted 1208'
Wastewater Program guideilnes. The Board notes these regulations are em•
ployed with all development over the Aquifer Sensitive ARea and have been
found effective in preventing poilution of surface and ground waters.
-5-
' .
19. The appellants indicated that Lhe anticipated increase of traffic would
cause hlgher noise levels in the area and degrade the air quality. Evidence
presented to the Board indicated that traffic noise generated by the proJect wili
not adversely affect residentiai areas as they are signlficantly buffered by the
1-94 freeway and the ridge to the south and the Spokane River and other
lndustrlal developments to the north as well as the voluntary setback on Lot 27.
The air qua{ity concern was addressed in environmental documents and
subsequentiy reviewed by the Spokane County Air Poliution Control Authority.
The impacts currently anticipated are believed to be less than originally
contemplated with the 1981 toning approval because of mandatory air emission
controls tor automobiles in the County, the increased use of unleaded gas and
smaller automobile engines.
20. That after considering all agencies/departments' review and public
.
testimony, the Board concludes that the proposal as conditioned will not be
detrimental to the general pub{ic health, safety and weifare.
21. That at the public hearing, Attorney Tom May, at the conclusfon of all
testtmony questioned whether or not the Board should have sworn in atl Indl-
viduals providing testimony. The Board notes that in fact the locai Spokane
County Environmental 4rdinance in Section 11.10.170 does provide that testi-
mony be under oath. However, the Board finds that, although being aware ot
the manner in which the hearing would be held before the 6oard, the appellants
did not raise this issue until after the ciose of the public testimony.
_ Additiona{ly, the Board finds that in their judgment, all testimony appeared to
be truthfully given.
22. That the sponsors, as indicated in prior findings herein, did initiate a
zone change in conJunctlon with their proposal. This zone change was not
required in order to develop the property as proposed. However, the sponsors
desired to make the proposal consistent with the new County zoning ordinance.
Although this ls the case, the Board finds that the sponsor has demonstrated
changed conditions warranting the new zoning. These include, but are not
necessarl{y limited to the Spokane County new Zoning ordinance in and of itselt.
Additionaily, changed conditions include a change in the originafly contemplated
development pattern of the community.
23. That on February 18, 1986, the 8oard, at a regular meeting, did the ap-
ea1 based upon the testimonies submitted at the public hearing and other evi-
P
-6-
. . . •
.
dence available to the Board and thus make the foliowing decision:
DECISION ,
From the foregoing Findings, the Board hereby DENIES the appeai and
UPNOLDS the Hearing Examiner Committee Decision of Approvai, subJect to the
revisions presented for buffering presented at the Board hearing and those
conditions of approval adopted by the Hearing Examiner Committee, attached
hereto as Exhibit A, and lncorporated herein by reference. '
BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS e?,"XAY OF
.
, 1986.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSfONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNT , A INGTON
~
hairman
r
~ •
The above action taken by a una im s vote of the
Board of Spokane County Commiss ners as follows:
Commissioner Keith Shepard - Aye
Commissioner John McBride - Aye
Commissioner Grant Peterson - Alre
ATT EST :
WILLIAM.••E~. D NAHUE
CIRrk f th~oard
.
ey:
De uty Clerk
: i• ~ 11
-7-
r~cI ci v 1=u
~
f;. . ~ ' M'AY 0 4 2000
:S c~ ~c n ~~POB'~NE'COUNTY EN
GINEER
- O- ,
1~(V)StQN r,ENGfNCEit1NG AND R4nDS • A DiVIS10N OF'T'IiG I'UDl.ic WOri~: N7'joo, ~
YVi,lli'in A. Johns, I'.C., Cotinty Einginucr I)cimis M. :icl)
CC: Ltst Initiats -
U ~ i f 1~ r~ r ti y .
.r~.GIZ.I~LI~~ILIV I i O Z ~i.~Y 1~ ~LS . ,
~ ~
~ -
Ei NGIIVE, ER'S AGREtt MENT NUNIIiE[t : -
, . . • -
This a,g;reemeht betweeri SPokaiie County 7iic1 Robert J. Bovle •
whose-interest in the prnject is ag~en,~,L Vice_Presi,~.i~o.~ ,
, ~e
--Ct:~nwncr~p~nr
is entered inco this 30th day of ~lArt~ , 19 __29 This agreeinent is arplicable to the project
known as: Sanson Center East (Sullivan. Park Centeir. Pre.llminarv Plat.,~ PZ-1504-855 .
~srrrj~-ntmr~~'tsrttt~~rmn~'rlte~tim~~jc~ . - .
That the ►ndividuals and parties named herein as having an iiiteresl' in tlie'above described properey or project agree
to the following:
Reimburse Spokane County for projeat :review and Inspection, fees as specified in Cliapter 9.14 0f
the Spokane County Code. The fees-will be based.,on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane ' . County for project reviews ancl / or inspeclions-plus.'a ten percent administrltive charge, ancl will
b,e villed monthly as accrued. Any billing amounts d'u,e, incl,uding any expenses incurred in the
"-s..coll'ect,ion of ansoverdue account, mwst Ue paid prior fo llie,Colinty's accertance of (lie projeet f'or
':._:Ifi;ling. If a pr,oject is anproved andlor fil'ecl with a balance still owiiig, fIie unpaid balance shall he
n ad willlin.30 days of tlle i»voice clate.
- - i - . , . ,
. .l~
lie'~unclersigned agrees that these Fees are clue a»cl payable upori receipt of the billi»g as specifiecl
above. = . .
. r.. _ .
. . .
'A~nfy.invoices, not paid witliin 30 cl'ays a,f (lie invoice date will he considered delinqueilt. lf -any-
iid witltin 30 clnys oF (lie invoice clme, f
i1s0nc3ing, jbal'a`nce on (lie Aceount for tltis project is not p,
cio~ fiarther reviews of the, rroject cfocutnents will be condueted until (lie enlire accotint bal<itice is
pi4 idAn,y',balance on the account for this project nOt p11d within 65 clays of (lie invoice date may ult, in, legal action or tlie irlitiation of other collection procedures, including referrll to a
°collectionagency. The Sponsor will be 1iable for any ancl alt expenses incurred by the County For
o. : .
- ~th,e c~ollecrion of overclue accounts.
- „ ~ ~-w . • ,
, '4.. ~~~~lie=mon"thly billing sfiould be sent to the altention of: ,
NAME. Hanson Industries, Inc. .;.k , . - . . ,
_ . . ~ . _
b' . , . .,kDDRES5: 15102 East Indiana Avenue ,
• ~ .
CITY, S1'ATE: Spokane, Wash_ington _ , . '
. Z[P COnE: .99216 '
r . , r •
PHONE (0~.)922-ti 5 , .
f. ki. ` i
I -
. d'erstand ~that failure to pay these Fees may result in delay,in completion or approval of Ilie project or ~tl_ier '
nossible-sanctions. '
, . ,
0,="'.=a'C.'Chislee{ agreeir_ient is completed by someune utlier tha~ii the Spoclsor (i.c., tlie projc:ct owiir:r rjf<< '
pri;neipal in the fi'rm sponsoring the project), such -as tlie Engi»eer CICSIgIlllls (lie nrojecA, en-=:
~ - .
- ' written authorization from the Sponsor sPcccCcally,`~atiiliorizuig (lie Agent to execate lllis~ I±ee.
°Agreement isattacEled lo: iis ee Agr menc,„ • . _ _
" SIGNA.T RE By:
~ . . .
, (I'RINT NAME) ~
ANr COiJNT_KENC1~
~FT~11tN':YrI'I.OW c:QP~To EP.QK
k1slRagreefCC.doc Z/1196
1,026 W Broadway Avc Srolcnnc WA 99260•0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TUn., (509) 324 :;(G6 -
. ,
a
_ . _ _ . a,-..~','~3~~in'~~ f. ~~F ' ' . , • , • ' . . - . . , _ _ • , . .f ' • e. . • . ri, : , . ' s. ;,g
RECE VED
, MAY 0 4 2000
S ra o rc n t-4 r-_ Cc) N-V=E COUMY ENGINEER
DIVISION OF ENGINEERINC AND ROADS • ADIVISION OF T1•iE T'UEII.IC 1NUR E "I'P9 NT~~
n~. v y17fUi m A. Johns, f.G., County Enginrer l~e~inis M. Sco t ~air lor
CC: Ltst tnttiab
C ~~f' fQ
AGR 1 1 M / NT r r0 PAY 1' LL S
~
~ .
~
zl~~-
ENGINE, ~ , ER S AGR, ~EM~ ~NT NUMI3~R
This agreement between Spokane Cotinty aticl Robert J. Bovle ,
whose interest in the pmject is aA~n ent, Vice_President of Hanson Indu.~trie~ .
~t-c-t~v~mcr-:► , cc~:7
is entered into this 30th day of Avril , 19 99 This agreement is applicable to (lie project
knownas: Hanson Center East (Sullivan Park Center Preliminarw Plat? PE-1504_$5) .
, tanIe St-rtte-ntrmticl,
That the individuals and narties named lierein as liaving an interest in the* above described property or project agree
to the following:
1. Reimburse Spokane Cotinty for project review and insrection.fees as speciied in Cliapter 9.14 oF
tlie Spokane County Code. The fees will be baseci on actugl salary costs incurred by Spokane
County for project reviews and / or inspections plus a ten percent aclministrative cliarge, anci will
be billed monthly as accrued. Any billing amounts due, includilig any expenses incurred in tlie
collectron of an overdue account, must Ue paid prior to (lie County's acceptance of the Project for
filing. If a project is apProved anci/or filed witli a balance still owing, (lie unpaid balance sliail be
paid witllin 30 days of tlie invoice date.
2. The unciersigned agrees that tliese fees are due and payable uron receipt of tlle billing as specified
above.
3. Any invoices not paid within 30 days of the invoice date will he considered delinquent. If any
outstanding balance on the accaunt for this project is not paicl within 30 clays of the invoice clate,
no fUrther reviews of the project ciocuments will be conclucted u»til (lie eiitire account halance is
paid. Any balance on the account for tliis project not paid within 65 days of tlle iiivoice date may result in legal action or the initiation of otlier collection procedures, including referral to a
collection agency. The Sponsor will be liabie for any and ali expenses incurred by the County for
the coltection of overdue accounts.
4. The monthly billing should be sent to the altention of:
NAME: Hanson Industries, Inc. -
ADDRESS: 15102 East Indiana Avenue
C[TY, STATE: Spokane, Washington ,
ZIP CODE: 99216
PHONE (509)922-5252
I understand that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completion or approval of the project or otlier
possible sanctions.
❑ If this fee agreeiYient is completed by somec,ne uther than the Sponsor (i.c., tiir pcoject owner cr a
principal in tlie firm sponsoring the project), stich as tlie Engineer designing the project, tlien
written authorization from the SPonsor specifically atitliorizing the Agent to execute this I'ee
Agreement is attached to lis ree Agr ment. SIGNAT RE By:
Jr-
~
~ ~ .
~ ~ • ~ ~ •
(PRINT NAME)
RFTLIRN YrI,I,OW COI'Y-Tn SPnKANE 01JNTY-1'NGINE{
k\s\f\agreefee.doc 2/1/96
1026 W I3raadway Avc Spokanc WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 T'AX: (509) 324-3478 TUn: (509) 324=31 C6
• ~ . ~ . .
• ~ = . _ - . • : .
HANSON tNDUSTRIES, iNC. 21608
U. S. BANK
15102 E. Indiana Avenue Spokane Valiey Financial Ctr.
Spokane, WA 99216 920$ East Sprague Avenue
(509) 922-5252 Spokane, WA 99206
19-1011250116 ' -
ONE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS
TO THE
ORDEROF 04/27/00 $100.00*****
Spokane County Engineers ~
Spokane, WA 99260 ~
~
- . . . , . . a- . . .
11800 2 L 608li' 1: 12 5000 10 5I: L 5 3 50 2 6 7 L P. 3 6
- . . ~ • • ~ - ~ . ~ ~ ~ i-.~ . n~ 1 ..~r . i ~ti w Y`~ Y~ ~r. r s. .1 . . lw~ - 1 ♦ k ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ • .
Received From: %Ilelv-21~ r_ Receipt No. ~
1 22 312
Ad d ress:
Date: - Z1=- ;
Amount Pa tl i/Yi ~
Z Acct. No.:
0 `Cash~ - . '
❑ Sales Tax: ~
• _ ~ ,
~ " Y ~ .
V Amt. of Acct: ` ~ ' - ^ ~
Money Order. Total Paid
Z Amt. Paid
-Check: L~J Ctieck
O Balance Due: Credit'Q Date.•
E .~oh~:-_~ ~
a 7'
tA Purpose: ° .s-~~~
~
~ ~ ` ~~Y? ft. •f`~ i ,f+w„~r a' v '
~ ./S • a Ir t-~;?~.--~ ~ ~
Received by:
~ ,j''~~~ ~s ~ L->' ; .
, , , ~ , _ . • ~ -
~r< r.r r
- ~ ~ ._.:,f - - - . .
. , . ~ ,
rl)IVISION (7r. I;NGINEERING AN1) 120AD5 /4 D1VISIC)N 6WITII 1'UBI.1C-WOItKS DVAR'I`I'•wN'r
SNiUiam A. Johri5, 15XE, Coiinty k:ngincer ~Denni's Mt. scoll, 1' I3.. 1)ircclor
A_LYR' EMENT l, O Pt`l,Y F~u, ►J
. ~
-t 'i ~ ~ 1~5 0 4
ENCIE1~ S ACR~~I'~INT N~'[T3CR - . ,
. . ,
This agreement between .5pokaile Coiipty and RQbeact S. BopJe , .
virliose itl_tereM iii lthe project _ag~e,t, Vice.,. Pre,~„Went of Hanson ~ n uUies
is er,lered ii it.o. "Liiis ~34th da,y of Au _99 applEi~e"ab(d`,topr~jeo, - ,
' s l 1 . . • ' ~ ' • ' "r ! _
kpown, as.: .(MT1m ~a~~ n°re~~~~~,erEn ~ - (Suivam Park Center ~'r~,~minaiY. p~.~,~
- That theAnr3ivi.duals and ~arCi~s ~aam~~~ l~er~in ~s, havang fii~ i~nlerest iit,, tt~~e above iiescribed prt~~aerty dr prqjeet.fi~gree
to ihei f,.QllQwir►g:
I _Re~i~nabu~rse S-pokane Couiit,y for project, revievu~ acid _ iilspeci,ion fees as specified in Cl'nAptEr l4 ,of
the- SpQk'aiie C`Qunty Cbtl,e. The fees 'tivill be basecl ~ Qn, actu~at satary cosrs inc~tirr6tl- by~ Spo:kane'
~County fo ~r, ;pr~j~ect revier~vs and / or ifisPe~iiohs PI'~~Lis 4 tei~ ~Per~ceiit- az~niii~~istt•ltive ~liarg~,, at7d ~~il,l~ .
, be billed mbnihly as acciued+. :.Any .l~:illing am4un'ue,. incl,u~lit~g.:aii~y expenses iiic~`crred ~ithe
1-collectivn, of an Qverzlue accounGmu~st f,~e pai'd! pr-id(tQ' t1m,, Coui~ty's'a~~eo~~~~e o. f the proJectf6r ~
~l~~l.i~'~~~ .
~ _ - i,li~ng. rI~'~a prc~,ec~t°i-s ~a~pprovett ~~nd/o~r.fil6~~-wit~11 ~~balaricstill'~iwit~g, tl~e~ui~.~~~~icl~ li~ I-ince
~asic~ ~wFatin 3~~1 days of (lie invoice date.
. - . . ~ . .
. ~ 2. '''he untl'ersignecl' agrees lhat these fees are due and payable upo» rEceipt of (lie billi~iig as-isneciC'~ed -
aUove.,. , : -
. . _ . .
. . , .
y -invc~iees noC paie~ wittiin 3(~ tlays nf the invc~ice_ clatE wil ; 1~e cQns~i,tleret~ c[elin~ue~~t. ' t~".,.~i7~, - f
_~~~t~i~~-n~ling-t~alai7ce '4i~ the accoun~ f~~r tlii~ prQject is,not-p~~i~~~wiIhi~7, 3(~ 41~~ys of tlie ~inu~»cc ~I~~,~e~„`
_..~~ook furllyer -reviews of th~ ~prc~jecC 01o'cuinaentswill be _conducted- tunfi'I tI~ve eiiIire account b~~laiiceP t,,
_ .
~ ~ , • . .
,Ra,i~d: ' ~1ii~y~ ~l~~t'ance on ~t'he ~cc~~ur►t For, tliis ~~roject n4,~ pait~ withir► 65 il~ay5 ~f ~lle inv~i~~~ ~~i~,,~' :
. ~ . .
• ~ ~ ~ e u, I~t -in, 1'egalaction or (lie initioti~n ~4f ot~l~~e'~ -col,l~etion ~j~r'oceclu~r:es; ihcluding r~efer~ra~~ ~to-.~ ~ .
_,cy. The Sponsor wi.ll' be li~able .for a,ny,anci a11 expen~6.q hictirredhy tlie Cou.n1y for -
Ilecti-on ag.en
; - -the collectio n cif-~Qverdue accaunts. -
. . - ~ . - . . . - . .
- . .4: ~'fie'iner~ttily billi~~g- sl~oulO l~e sent to ~the attenrion
•s , - ~ -e
~ ' • NA,M E:' Hansgp. Indus,trie- s , • In.c.
AD]aRESS: 15102 Easlt Indi_4ia. Aveuue
~ CTTY, STATE: Spokane. Wash:Lngtou-
~ Z1P CODE: 99216 ~ - . ' .
+ .
. - , . . . . . ,
PliOlNE (02)922.-52.5,2 ~ - .
T unde~~~~ntl lhat ~~ilure t4 ~ay tli~s~~ f~~s rnay ~•~stilt in delay in coyvpleli~in or approval c~f Ille prajec~t ~c~~ c~tlie;r
. . . .
- possible-sanctions. ~ . ~ • ~ ,
. .
L~ , df:rl~~us, f6e agreerr~enf, is cc~~~ri~lcted by so«ie~rr~e t~tk7er t'har<<- t~~,~ Sp~~ti's«i- (i.~~., ii~~ ,or~6; . - - . - -
. prine-ipal in (lie firni,sp4nsoring, thc-,-Proj,ect),,, suchvas 'the' E:Skigitleer designing-. llie -prdjectt _t15~-ft.
written authoritaCioc7 froin ihe Sponsor, sPecificallk -ai~tho~i~i~g -the Ageiit to execiitoripdv;V~°~e~ ,
~ Agreemefit is abta6li.ed tQ i~i'gr-ee Agr rneni,.
' . • ~ , • _ - , . . _ : - . ~ .
5IGN Afi RE.By:
• 11 _ - . ~ • , , .
- eT' , / • , ~ ~ r, " : - .
~ . : (PR[N,`{' NAMF} . _ _ , . . . t.
LOW CnPY- '"(`l S M~f~A~I~.~~~1 ' 1,~,I[~~~~ .
.
k-s\tla~greefGe.clue 2l1~196 1026 W Byaac3wAy A'_vc SY7olcamc WA 99260-0 f 7Q (S09) 456-3600 FAX: `(S09) 324-347$ .'1`1)1): (501) 324-3166
. ~ • _ f J. ,
• ) ~ - , J i' ' ~ • -I S j ' . , ~ , , r ~ ~ ' 7
. . . r ~ ' . i7 - . . , " . _ . . - - • , t . _ • . ' f. . ' '
APR-30-1999` 14:36 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01i01
j;,.~~• ,'ilf.r rFUrFrc L.Q
"•,PM JOB* '
• - . . . _ . , 46
0M5*14 oF r~ra»taa~ws. n»•~ R~AM • l► (}IVfuNN !7► 1'i Wultf.'Si)Eta1tTlIWI CC: list Inicials
WAu., A. y.14,. t C. r.,. r.'i..., , .
b 3 ~►c.n•: «a, • 1I. r.;,
. ~
ac M - MLXr A) rA Y ne ts ' I
1 ,
KNCENfM'S ACiEl,lJMLNT NLMi42 _ p I
I
T111= setetRUnt ber*Wm
WtkiC IIItClCd Itl 1hK J+mjn0 Ull. PMO1Qlm Qtillinam ladmtriak•-•
i1 eQlencd Iate t►+is jQ&h- d,y of ~ .19 ~_,'~tis igroeliltnt i* u~lk~~le cQ ine pres~.tt
kb"n ss t,,.£ft ..Lista tEAMAU •
T+ts fse tfldlvdYntl;AQ pAnin nsmod trerlJnm ll41,41a» ia;errli in tliv 2bavc cie;:ritied prumrir or prq}at ag:cc
ta tha felte»nf►a;
l. Rclmburre Spotenr Cowncl ror pCVjme ravKv zib riupetI4m tees as qccttW 0% t'nspoer 9.14 of
1k $p0ka1it Caumy CudC. S1+e !m wiu bC bilalf On tetuil w4ary COS1i fmurrtd by gpukurit
Caueqr jow pfpjt'ct rtvitw3 mij I w inqlectiuto pltia I trn {+eKent aftlat11ro1rvc drttic, srd wtEl
Ds Oll4W mnrt%ty v aaavcd, Am► bAlW iTtann due, iarwding W17 CipeltjC= fpClliiOd (A TI?!
eoiiwsloo of an oranlwemsmm+l, ruum 14 Pskl pdnr m the CQUto's acccplsa=•c c11 t1vc prQ*t fior
R1#ttj. 1l t ytb)eCt Is orf rovM sAdler rMcf wltR a h4i1Qrtr.e t1lf2 ewing. che urt(+aid balaecca skefi he
psEd v+kttin 3+Q dty, o[ the tt++uiee daltc.
Z. Tbe bnJucign0 qrt= tl:n chrse fat ue din itg raysD!r uron recemt et clrc !►illing is tpstAeu
soorr.
• 1. Atry nt~Oka no[ N'd vima 30 Qay3 of Qie ta~'oke ctits w;I1 OC KManlrttci driinqtteRt, ff inY
otitgsnrlhg b=tmu m ft accimnt (or ibi-, pra)esz }s sNt p4f -iCh1n ICI dcoy; of !-hi otvnice doct,
no futthu icrks►s ul dse pmjttt OxumqntQ wij1 ix ct,aiv:w «Mil da e,ulrc uwaat siitancc 11
aaid. AnY aatwo a+ ibe &caour+t toc thb prejees noc paiJ vrNi:, 65 tkrg of t!k Invoice dste moy
mvh tft teist aaion or she Mitiaiiun of affier ce►tecelor. procedursa, ;Reloding :sfssn# tu s
o41sclio++ ipary. The Slinnsar wiit bt Ilahlt toe aey sncl :i) «rxmwe inturred by Nt CoatstY T•"
iho tQilectha af twerdni aecwnts.
4, 11um ,inn[hlr Otlttng stmttd b stnt to tfse wttentba oi:
NAMB: , -33it• Ti tE_ . . .
IIDDQesS' ~ ~Lai sw15
ttTY. .4tATB: . . ~gl~-.s..~Yh te - . _ •
iI'P ME. ~~w ~ •
F#iVNU i. t3D4?~~_s~ , . N•
1Wr,.ir.n1rd duc fiaure :e psy aic:e fm ,nay revJlt in ck1ty in «nple!ion in appruvas of Me projecti ar atite
pou(Ate anettvni.
U IE diis fr_ r37e01ent ee Cat►gteaeJ 16y sMPang ethtr ctian tt,e Spoasor ti c. tha pssslets tlwrer o: R
PriRCtpl in ttc tlm: spomring :hy pr*,;I}, stch so tnt Enft+teet d+csignm= i1x prvjecc. ~l'wg
wrlttM uth+atltition kom the Sfiemnc R+ieifiraRr iWWborttia ai• ACe11c to exWUt• cldl !a
t
AWMIeet 6 6114C iRt: Pde Aj ae'hr.
~
SlGN~~~fi B~: . • . . . . •
(PIiINT NAME)
BrnMN.I%&l.71dLCMPY-~StQ
►tphpsdo4s vtA0
g4ft1r eroe6+t"Awe 1q1ntWnw WA 9JIi0•Of" tlA'11s!L3i04 CAx: {lM 324-347PF TIft OM13I4 1144
TQ'wt'll. P. L
APR-30-1.$99 14 :34 INLAND PAC I F I C E140 P. 01"01
h 1
. 1
✓
INIAND PAGlF!(; ENGINEERINC
707 West ?th Avenue, Suite 200
spokane, VPA 99204
TelePhone: (509) 45"840 FAX:. (509) 458-4844
FilX TRANSMI'TTAL
DATE: NO.OF PAGE3: Z (DultidQv cover page)
TO- L7 l LC.. ~'.]EM~1 ~ ~i~ FAX -32-Qr' m,78
1
coMParnt: S~ GAn 0". , pgaNE d:
FROM: 45. r1 ~ Jub
PI20dECT NAME:
nRi(;TN4T., IN MAm 0 YES ❑ KO ~ v~•' ~f ~`'-~~'w"~~
NUTES:
~b4A&-,4 s U. P.
~
~
.
I ~ • r c~~.. ~I~ ~
RFV 4ro7 Q:\Fl,)RMSkFAYSHF.FT.WFU
mrm?jnw copy ra4p!Qmj$SQL'.^!7
►vo.e+•c..w y~rle
rWs w R,o.Aw A•O !l,mAa►nftWw sltfs-01?!1 uoUf 416-Sf00 CAK: (!M 321•34" Tl3a: UM):1Id 1166
v
a
ilurft, enplnwlnp Itectun. L.. ,/uud:ntuw WM SwMrO REcE►vEa
CLC ASSOCIATES, INC. FEB 0 9 2001
SPOKANE, WA • DENVER, CO
SPOKANE COUNT1' ENGINEER
~
TO:
f~;. 9 w C~ nr
-
a-F
at- ♦ i :Ar
A}
ATTENTION:
;g'r" ki: t"A"'• •..:x~n i• - ~ , ir,~A %".~~SFt' ~ ""~x
~ _iKj rxf'i"~' •ix.. ~ ~ t ~3~ hu, c?L ~~`"~'.i~`Ir,~~ sJy
Description .
~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~
M~ Original Drawing M ~ Contract Documents M~
M~ Work Authorization Report
No. Copies Description
~ vI ele-lc.J
U
PUIpOSe ~
~
M~ Information I~SI Review & Comments M~ Per Your Requ
M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~
~
Remarks
~"~i1n~~y~' ~iG`~~v~lK i`/~~:►~~`~,f~Cra ~~~~.~z~L ~~-2.~
eae-de-.5C-7V. __~CN/
Sig°ed:
cc:
707 W. 7th Ave., Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 458-6840 Fax: (509) 458-6844
1.~ -
f _
. . . , . , ,
. , . . .
. , , _ . • . • . .
; ' t\ ~ ~ ~y ~ • ` . • • ` • . . •
• ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ • • y ~ ~ ! • • •
. ~ ti. • /
. \ ` . . ~ ~ . . ~ ' • ~ . . . . . . . .
~ ~ • , ~ ` ~ . ° ♦ ~ • '
` , • ,y•` I• f•• v '
` ~ ` . . • ~ ~ i ~ •
~ ` ~ I• , ~ • ~ • • ti ` ~ 1 ~ ♦ ~ • • .
A C C E S S ROAD 2 . ~ ~ - . . _ • ` .r . . f ~ ` ~ ~ . ,
SEE DETAIL
• ti~ v ' ~ . ' ~ f . .
'•r.~ ; ~ . , . , ` , • • • •
Xti 'M~ry~,1 •~w~ ' 1 ' ~ w ~ . ,,;`?~i►/~ ~ ` • . ~ .
~ '~~tiw.~y 7 ~ • ~ ti ~ ~ ~ •
~ ~ \ . • L. • ' . ~ • . '
1,,.CZ 14
` \ ~ / , \ ti w •
1''~. ~ ~ .
~ :/A(-N~/ ` ~ ~A' ♦ ~ • • , •
f •ti ~ ` . c ~ . ~ . .
4 '~n ~ \ \ a •
~ • , ` „ , . . . • \ ` ' ~ , , .
C ~ • • ~~►~.r~~ • ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` .
~ - RY
E~PORA
DE SAC
''~•;~:j µ ; r;;: ' L ~ ~ ~ ` \ `y J
::;:lr~ E~ DETAIL ~
L~. , r~ry _ .s~.. \ . ` ` ♦ . f \ .
;1.: : i:'~ _ ~ ~ ij ti•' • • i✓ a
~ : ~ N `
~ •i: . . i: : : : : • • ' i:: ~i: ir:.. ~ ~
:~i ~ . r: ::•i -
:~i: i'r'r:i: :;i:$ :~ti :v: ; ~ '::{•i: f . . . .i ii ~ fi. ~ ' ~ : : :•i:: . .
~ ~ i..::. ~ .
~ .tnar.'~ ~.Cv.d'%e6e/%~L/.~f~f ~ i : .y : : : : . . ' y.
''ti. ~ ~ ti.
~,,r: ~ . , • ~
~ i\I\Ir^•MVI~I~~'N•~ILI~•II.IVI4I~~/MV~• ~ ~
, - • . • ~ ~/M~/~ ~ ` • . •
•I~~ ~ ~ • c 1'`0 ~
" \ _i
• • . i ir •I~ / • , • ~ ~ ' • ♦ L ~ ~
•I~ «~.i.I`i rI'....... 1.~.~V + oo 1•V/ ~Vr. ..•...ti......•.. •ti..... ~I.~. Ih.ti.... ~..r..~..~ i ~,hr~..•
•
~ ~ . ~ i ~ . - • ~884-00.
~ V; S ~ ~ + ~}..r~ `
N 7,4'27`29'"W ' . : ` ; , ;
~ \ ' ~ . (4•....... :.i = Y f ~ ~
~ / , .
. . : ' ~ ~ N DIANA . .A-VE:
.
. - . , .
' ~~~M.~~ • • . •
• ♦ 1 • ~ !
. • . ` • . .I
•
l: ~ • • .
.1'. :!i .Yi.%• 'J•
.••I • ~I~ . • ~1 'lI.I. ~ : ~ : • ' !I 'r': J: l: : II: J: : : /J': : . .
l::.~.
. 1:........-~
.f. .f: .J: •.•tt•.'l::l::.~I.'.~:.~:1::::.~::.~::.~f1:::1•:J~
f.. ' I.•I •!!r
. ..J.: ~ : ~ . . ~ ?l :'l: : : : ' l.•.:•: I .'.•.•J.' . . . I... l : l : ! IJ.•:.': I.Y : :•1..~ I.•.:.. : . . . . •.Y:. ' J: : .
• . . . . . . . . . . . f . . . . !.'r . . . . . • . . . I. • • . . . . . . ~ . J. . . . r . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . .i : i : J: : i : i . :•.ti'.': . : '.•l: : : . . .
. . . I.•. : : : l.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::'J. : ~ J.• . ~ : : . . . : : : : . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J,II. . . . . tJ: ! : . ~ . . . . . . . . ; '.~~'l.•
f . .'t.' . r: I!.• .'%l :`J..
~I. , •'~.r.. . ~ . . , .
• ~ ~ ~ ~ w~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Y~ ~ ~'Y~a~ • • ~ • ~ .
. . . 1q., . ~'v ` v .
. • ~ rr"
~ . .
.
• • • .
` ~ . • ` • ! 1
, 14
. ~-26~ - AJ TIuTY,. SioEwAI~K~. q.NO ~ . . .
SLOPE EASEMENT . . .
~ _ _ . .
• _ , • ~ ~ • ~ • ' _ i .
r
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:09 AM
To: Shaw, Francine
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg;
Hohman, John
Subject: RE: PE-1504-85 - Hanson Center East
The proposed plat is missing drainage easements for the grassy swales that are shown on the plans.
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:02 AM
To: Shaw, Francine
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg; Hohman, John
Subject: RE: PE-1504-85 - Hanson Center East
A temporary cul-de-sac is shown on the plans with the border easement covering the bulb so the previous
comment is withdrawn. Thanks
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 10:27 AM
To: Shaw, Francine
Cc: Engelhard, Scfltt; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg; Hohman, John
Subject: PE-1504-85 - Hanson Center East
8-14-00
I received the above referenced proposal on August 11, 2000. The site plan that was submitted does not
have a clu-de-sac at the east end of Indiana Ave. as required by the Spokane County Standards for Road
and Sewer Construction.
Bill Hemmings, PE
Page 1
r~
~
J _
Kimball, Sandy ~
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 11:02 AM
To: Shaw, Francine
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg;
Hohman, John
Subject: RE: PE-1504-85 - Hanson Center East
A temporary cul-de-sac is shown on the plans with the border easement covering the bulb so the previous
' comment is withdrawn. Thanks
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 10:27 AM
To: Shaw, Francine
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg; Hohman, John
Subject: PE-1504-85 - Hanson Center East
8-14-00
I received the above referenced proposal on August 11, 2000. The site plan that was submitted does not have a clu-de-sac at the east end of Indiana Ave. as required by the Spokane County Standards for Road and
Sewer Construction.
Bill Hemmings, PE
Page 1
~
.
✓ '
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 10:27 AM
To: Shaw, Francine
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg;
Hohman, John
Subject: PE-1504-85 - Hanson Center East
8-14-00
I received the above referenced proposal on August 11, 2000. The site plan that was submitted does not have a
clu-de-sac at the east end of Indiana Ave. as required by the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer
Construction.
Bill Hemmings, PE
Page 1
t
Hemmings, Bill .
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 1999 12:54 PM
To: 'Susan Murphy, EIT'
Subject: Sullivan Park Center
4-29-99
The section you sent over here on 4/28/99 appears to be the correct section that was adopted for Indiana Ave. I
do not recall getting a fax in February on this project.
How about May 6th for a predesign meeting? What time is good for you?
Bill Hemmings, PE
Page 1
T NI_AND PAC I F I C ENG P. 01
APR-2E-1999 16:27
` -
~ -
~
INLANJ3 FACIFIC ENGINEERING
707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 94204
,
Telephone: (549) 458-6840 FAX: (509) 458-6844
:F~4X ?'A'ANSII~ITT~iL
~ 1Z~ ~ . ~ .
DATE.. NO.OF PAGES: j
, (uicLrding cover page)
.
To: AtM rY► +M aA 32,1- 311-78
'
COMPANY: 4t;,~ ~ . PHONE 4-I -7 - 3lo ci0
FROM: AU JOB
~
PROJECT NAME: c~i ~ IYt~iYL- Pari-
OFJGINAL IN MAIL: O YES Q~ NO -m -xA S5
Q.~~GI ZE ~ l~j 78~
NOUS:
~
-
U
~ ~ ~k,4,0
1
bice, 4-o
.
U '
P)JEA4~
REv, 997 OAFORMsNFAXSfiEE'r.wPD
ppCIF1C ENG ~ ~
INLAND . _
~
•
,%f1 _~___r•
3
A >
~
n
~
.
Nf
rn ~
~
i; -
t
~
~
J
~
. Q
~ u
~ y
~
r
. M
r.
i
~
~ „
.v:
~
~
.
n
~
s ~{QTat' P ~
.
~ ♦
ti
. !
Pre-Design Meeting Notes
Spokane County Engineers Office
Project Name: d5u~4 vAait P*tv.- Cc%tTtg, Project Number:,Project Sponsor: 4P45-01-4 ~ ~~ST~~~S
Sponsor's Engineer:
Design
Firm: ZNLkvtp 9,Aci:F►c. 644wo4 EeCi." ~"o Engineer: :50504 Mu&Pr{ty
Meeting Date: A fit► tr (O ? laJ5°.) Meeting Time: (D $ 4 O P,► M.
County Staff Present at Meeting: ~~u~w! v~t+.~t~• ~
Other Meeting Attendees:
~v3R+4
nalne/representing nanie/representing
name/representing name/representing
The Following Items need to be Discussed w/ the Design Engineer
General Items
1 a. List certain special requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval, EIS, or MDNS. This is
not an a11-inclusive list. The Engineer and Sponsor is responsible for adhering to all Conditions and
design criteria.
description reference
description reference
description refcrence
description reference
1b. Does the Engineer have a copy of the Examiner's/Staff Conditions of Approval? YE5
2. Include Standard Plan notes in the Road and Drainage Plans. yc-z
~ r • ' i
Pre-Design ]'.vvlee#ing N4tes for k'roaect: Page: 2
Spokane County Public Works
Raad Plans
I . Road Classifications and Design Criteria.
# 1 42 #3 #4
. ,
. .
r................
~5treet I~Iarr~e
. ;
~
- ~
. .~.m.----~
~lasS1ficat1oI1 1M H ~ . ,,t. ~
. , .
. , . .
M Tez0 AL.
_ v .
. , ~
.
~
W ~
~.O~.C~1~V~.y Wldt~],
~ . ~ ~ .
•
Mitvmum right--of-way width
. . .
.
.
. . •
• • .
. .
see note (l) 174
.
.
• ~
.
............_.....................r...._.._.._.._.'_.................
• •
~ ~
...........s.._.._.........r~er.-e___.__._
.aaaa~• . ~
.
. . . . .
.
_ . . ~
11~n. Hor1z, Curve wl super ~ . .
~ .
.
---...~,ri..
. , _ i-------................-----
M'-
,
ln. Horiz. Curve w/o super
. .
,
A----- - ~ ~
.
W.~..~.~.u._...
,
. ~ .
. ~ ,
eneral Land Slopel'"erraln
.
.
r.
.
.
.
_..w. ~
- -
~
: ---.-=-m................
~
. ,
DeS! Speed, I71ph ~ ' •
•
`~17 p . 72
:
-----------...........'s:....................----.......................:.
.-V.. .
.y.,~...4 ........------.....................,-;----~3-_-~.--------.w.w._~v___
Gurb Ty~pe & Clear Zone ~'4 -p~„ ~
.
(see Sec. 3_ 15)
em .
4------------
Sidev,ral.k required? (yeslno)
YCS
-
1Vote (1_) Atlditional right-of=way may be given by the Sponsar. _
Discussion: 4:;40"a& _ D"W forL -5.~ ~&l "T'I;p 1*1T1R = h~ Off`i 94S
'aK] ~ ~ ~)Owk A-v&.
:5w ~-us.
~ K" 'tG 1 0*7e fk~~
2. Accarding to the Design Engineer, what 1C the I]1a7511'17L1TY1 17UIY1ber Qf LII'3.1t5 WhjCh w11l haVe
access from a single roaduFay? /(o lVhat is the rnax, allowed per Sec.1.03? {IN)A
3. A'xu'.mum intersection spa.cing is 300' far alang a Princxpal or Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04),
and ISO' for a Collectar or Loca.l Access street. What spaeing is provided for this project?
oq A4
J
- ~ ` 0
Pre-Design Meeting Notcs -for Froject: Page: 3
Spakane County Public Works
4. Are any off-site slape easernents needed, ar off-site righ#-of-way acquisitians needed? If so,
descnhe.
t,,,J
5. What type af turn-arounds are needed? (i.e. cul-de-sac, hammerhead, etc.)
Street Narne Turn-a,round Type Location
„
r~
~
, ,
~ - - ~D 0 {-~N~1
,~r ~
.~.~..~s...s.._.
------~,...~..RS.,_ .~.~..~4.. _ -
- - . . .
-
6. Road Surfacing Requirernents (Sec. 3 16)
a} What rnethod in determining road surfacing requirements dves -the Design Engineer propose
to use (i.e. AASHTC] Design Method, County thickness table, or other)?
~ ~ ~,ID
b) Provide the Design Engr. a cQpy of the Soil Sarnple Procedures, Design Repvrt Format &
Alternate Pavement 'Design Table.
7. Does the Engineer plan on applying for any Design Deviations? If so, briefly describe below.
Please note that approval of a11 'Y]esicyn Deviatton's must, be obtained prior ta consti-uction
plan su'bmittal.
{~ok r, - 12. o. SOPAVATE
baC4 mam-
Storrn Drainage
1 _ B asin Map
a) Did the Design Engineer bring to the meeting a basin map? . If so, does the basin
map show topagraphy arrd sufficient infarmation #o be useful? Yt-s .
b} Does the basin map depict any contributing off=site runofFf]owing onto the property? )AM
~
Does it appear to be correct? )LIL . If not, explain. .
c} Is a site visit needed to verify the basin limits? N 0 Schedule far:
{Note: Concurrence vvith County Engineer's on basin limits is rcquired prior to pim submittaM. )
2. Is the site located within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)`? lea . What type of water
quality treatment is proposed by the Design Engineer`~ ~5Wjp~,M t- teqUjE,.Z
♦ ' ~
[ w ~ •
\ I ♦ ~ ~ ~
Are-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 4
Spokane County Public Works ,
3. What subsurface investigations, if any, are needed with this project to make sure the
proposed disposal process will function as planned.
14 o r,LE .
4. A.re there downstream conditions which will affect the design of drainage facilities. If so
describe possible mitigative measures.
t4d
5. Is maintenance access provided to each GPA swale or drainage pond? If there is something
unusual, what requirements were given to the Design Engr.?
.
6. What does the Developer/Engr. propose for providing for perpetual maintenance of the
drainage facilities? Please briefly describe proposed mechanism, and what is needed to
accomplish this.
~ft 9MSA Qw N r.-*. 'tO rM M4t r't -rM► N S ua ~1. ss Q N ~rh%rH
7a. What Design Storm(s) should be used in the course of analysis (i.e. 10-yr, 50-yr, etc.).
10 Vs*C.. FGc OwS !'T6 - <4 (/IQ. ,FdC... C~~ iTe
7b. Is a Detention or Retention system proposed? Please describe.
8. Are Erosion Control Measures required with this project? If so, briefly describe applicable
requirements.
Vcc _ Oc.A-t-4 mN Fi u~
9. Is a second Pre-Design Meeting needed? N 0
.
. r~
,
Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: PagE: 5
Spokane County Public Works ,
List of Documents Provided to the Sponsor's Engineer:
a)
b}
c)
d)
e)
Any easement.s needed outside of the plat baundary, for• drainage or other, are to be acquired prior-
to road and drainage plan submittal. T'he Sponsor• or Sponsor•'s Engineer shall provide separately
a legal description and 1 itle Commitment (or similar- pr•oof of ownership) of the affected parcel(s)
f or proposed easements.
The Submittal. Checklist, completed and srgned by the Spansor's Engineer, ,shall be provided with
each plan suhmittal.
Note: Provide a copy of tlzis completed dacument to the Design Engineer at the end of the pre-
design meeting.
filename:PreDesign meeting
C1'1'1'
pQ i1e
VaHey '
al 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
October 171 2006
Attn: Yvonne Olmeda
American International Companies
Principal Bond Office
27th Floor
175 Water Street
New York, NY 10038
Re: Release of Mai.ntenance Bond #224564
Hanson Industrie,s, Inc.
Project: PE-1504B-Hanson Center East
Dear Ms. Olmeda,
Construction of the public works portion on the above referenced project has been
accepted by the City of Spokane Valley. Therefore you are authorized to release
im.mediately, Roadway Improvement Maintenance Bond No. 224564, in the amount of
$83,450.00, in full.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 688-0185.
Sincerely,
John V. Hohman, P.E.
Senior Engineer
cc: , ► ; ~ , ' e
Page 1 of 1
Allan Jackson
From: Allan Jackson
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:02 AM To: Sandra Raskell
Cc: John Hohman
Subject: AIC request for bond release Hanson Center East improvement Sandra,
Hanson Center East Plat improvement, P 1504B, consisted of constructing Indiana Avenue between
Sullivan Road and Flora Road. Other work in addition to grading, surfacing, and asphalt concrete
paving included curbs and gutters, sidewalks, drainage, and two `208' ponds. Construction was started
in June 2001 and substantially completed by Apri12002.
I reviewed the entire project for final acceptance today. All work appears to have been constructed in
accordance with the plans and Spokane County Standards. However there is one item that will need
correction. The concrete driveway for the Marriott Residence Inn has a large loagitudinal crack adjacent
to the sidewalk portion of the approach between the sidewalk and Indiana Avenue. This driveway was
constructed after substantial completion since approaches were not constructed during the
improvement. It will need correcting but I am uncertain if this correction should be connected with this
i.mprovement, the commercial building permit (assuming warranties are also required for building
projects), or is now the responsibility of the property owner.
Ross Kelley/John Hohman approved a reduction in the performance bond to a 10% ($83,450)
maintenance bond on August 14, 2002. American Intemational Compan.ies requested release of this
bond on January 26, 2006. Since the warranty period has expired, this bond (#224564) can be released
in full unless the concrete approach repair will be considered part of the improvement.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Allan Jackson .
2/3/2006
i
t ROADWAY INIPROVENIENT BOND Bond No. 22-45-64
KNOW ALL BY THES£ PRESENTS, thaE Hanson Industries, inc. (developer), as "Principat," and The tnsurance
Company of the State of Pennsylvania (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the taws of the
State of Massachusetts and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as "Surety" are held and
firmlv bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in ihe penal sLUn of
5834,500.00 (Eight Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Five Hundred and N4/I00 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Coostruction:
$8189700.00 Eight Hundred Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred and NOl100 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Indiana Avenue $666,700.00 (Six Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract A Drainage 5116,500.00 (One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Trart B Drainage S 35,500.00 (ThirtyFive Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Inspection: 515,800.00 (Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars) itemized as foIlows:
Indiana Avenue S 15,200.00 (Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars
Tract A Drainage S 300.00 (Three Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract B Drainage S 300.00 (Three Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
lawful money of the United States of Ainerica, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their
heirs, executors, adrninistrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. .
WHEREAS, said Principal is the developer of a tract of land in Spokane County known as Hanson Center East
(Spokane County Project No. P1504B) and besng located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M.,
in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a Performance Bond be furnished in an amount
sufficient to pay the construction cost of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, drainage control and/or
paving of roadways adjacent to said development, and such other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, as well as
all in accordance with the accepted plans on fiIe at the Spokane County Engineer's Office and Spokane County Road
Department specifications dated April 1999, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such impravements
to be comp2eted withln one (1) year or less from i6e date of plan acceptaace unless said tirne period be extended ai
the option and with the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer; and
WKERFAS said County has required that a Performance Bond be furnished in an amount suf~'icient to pay the
cost of construction inspection and testing for roadway and storm drainage oonstruction of said development, and such
other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with the accepted pians on file at the Spokane County
Engineer's office, and services to be completed within one (1) year or less from the date of plao acceptance unless
said time period be extended at the option and with the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer; and
THEREFORE, upon failure of Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized,
and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Qbligee to the
cxtent of this Bond; and
'fHEREF4RE, the obligation of this Bond shalI be kept in full force de =Ie' til, in the opinion of the
Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfed, in which event 'tten ase witl be given by the Obligee,
the Obligee having sole right Eo grant such release. Surety hereby waives, 1 rights to rele e from the obligation except
as stated herein. _
SIGrED AND SEAL.ED this 14"day of November, 2000.
BONDING COMPANY; ' THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF TNE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Address: P. 0. BOX 2151
City, State: SPOK.ANE . wA
Zip Code: 99210
.
Phone#: 509-358-3900
By:
Title: W. W. WELLER, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
PRINCYPAL (Devetoper): HANSON JNDUSTRIF.,S? INC.
Address: 15102 E. ZIdDIANA AVENUE
City, State: SPOKANE, WA "
Zip Code: 99216 Phone 509-922-5252
(To be notarized by PRINCIPAL(s) arrd SURE?'Y)
• (1) For acknowledgment in on irrdividuvl capacity
State of Washington )ss
County of Spokane )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (hisJher) free and
voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
Dated
Notary Public in and
for the State of Washington
My Appointrnent Expires:
(2) for arr acknowledgmenl in a represe»tative capacity:
State of Washington }
ks
County of Spakane )
I certi that I know or have satisfact W. W. WELLER
fy ory evidence that is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed ihis instrwaient, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized
to execute the instrument and acknowiedge.d it as the ATTORNEY-IN-FACT of
THE TNSiiRAHCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purpases
mentioned in the insinunent. PENNSYLVANIA
Dated NOVEMBER 14, 2000
Notary Public itt and JoANNE TONADII
for the State of Washington
My Appointment Expires: 7/ 15/ O 1
,
ti MANSON
H ANw7~.I N INDU71 RIE~7, IN~r. (a[~9) 822-52I52anFaxV(5a9) 22~5757. WA 99218
E-mail; admfnghansdnind.com
October 28, 2002 ~ECEI'V~D
0 C T 3 1 2002
SpOKANE COUNrr EnGiNEER
Mr. John I-l:ohrnan
Developmen# Services EngineerlManager
Spokane County
1026 West Broadway Avenue ,
Spokane, Washington 99260-0170
Re: Bond N0, 22-45-64
Hanson Center East (P 15 O4B)
Dear Mr. Hohman:
I am farwarding the, Qriginal, of the above referenced bond,. The anlount reflects
t1ne walranty suni.
P1ease execute and send, a copy of the fully executed band in the enctased self
addressed; stanped envelope #01Vlarsh Advantage (JaA,n.n 7`ana.niat, 509-3 5 8 -3900)-
'fhank you.
~
Sincerel~r•
!
Qiit/ Y +
Robert T. Boy1e
~~~e President
. , - . : . • ' " . r y .
. , • , , - .
~
f ,
,
S P O K A N E . C O U N T Y
DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISIOIV OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
August 14, 2002
Insurance Co. of The State of PA
POBox2151
Spokane, WA 99210
Re: Bond Number 22-45-64 - Hanson Center East (P 1504 B)
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please be advised the improvements in the Hanson Center East Plat are now substantially
completed. Hanson Industries, Inc. has made a request to reduce the performance bond
down to the 10% maintenance amount. Please reduce the bond amount from the
remaining bond amount of $166,400.00 to $83,450.00. .
If you have any questions, please call our office at (509) 477-3600. Sincerely,
Ross E. Kelly, P.E.
Spokane County Engineer
f'
John V. Hohman, P.E.
Development Services Engineer/Manager
Cc: Hanson Industries, Inc.
. File
1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133
iliisvrance Company Woridwide
fArlNome Assurance Company Boading
Granite State Insurance Company SEABURY & SMITH American International Companies
The Inst.tance Company of the State of Pennsyivania
Naoonal Union Fire fnsurance Company of Pittsburgh. Pa. oCT 19 20 Principai Bond Division
New Mampshire Insurance Company 70 Pirte Street, New York, N.Y. 10270
SPOKANE
SURETY RIDER
To be anached to and form a part of Bond No. 22-45'"64 dated Novemb _r 1 nn
eXecuted by Hanson Indusr_r; PS_ lnC - as Principat. and
The Insurance Company of the S-tate of Pennsylvania
as Surety, in favor of
Spokane County Engineers
as Obligee.
In cons+deration of the premwm charged. ic is understood and agreed that, effective on AuQuSt 14, 2002 ,
The amount of the bond is reduced
FROM: One Hundred Sixty Six Thousand Four Hundred and no/100ths---------($166,400.00)
T0: Eighty Three Thousand Four Hundred Fifty and no/100ths-----------($83,450.00)
Provided. however, thac the tiabiltty of the Surety under the anached bond and under the attached bond as changed by this rider shatl not be
cumulative Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary, waive, atter or extend any of the terms, conditions, agreements or warran;iP<<of the atov.~-
. _ ~ .
mencioned bond, other than as stated above.
. .
Signed. sealed and dated OCtOber 11, 2002. ,
, Hanson Industries, Inc.
(Princi al) (Seal) ,
l ~tc~
~
Accepced• By pgt
(
Spokane County Engineers The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Obhgee) (Surery)
.
. /
gy Y
(Title) . Ttio en . Attor ney- in- Fact
a B
33
{
t
. ,
/
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DNISION OF ENGIIVEERING AND ROADS A DIVISIOIV OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Augu,st 14, 2002
,
Insurance Co. of The State of PA
POBox2151
Spokane, WA 99210
Re: Bond Number 22-45-64 - Hanson Center East (P1504 B)
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please be advised the improvements in the Hanson Center East Plat aze now substantially
completed. Hanson Industries, Inc. has made a request to reduce the performance bond
down to the 10% maintenance amount. Please reduce the bond amount from the
remaining bond amount of $166,400.00 to $83,450.00.
If you have any questions, please call our office at (509) 477-3600. Sincerely,
Ross E. Kelly, P.E.
Spokane County Engineer
.
,
John V. Hohman, P.E.
Development Services Engineer/Manager
Cc: Hanson Industries, Inc.
. File
1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 o (509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (549) 477-7133
13I5CE1119=0l
L HANSON AU6 14 2002
15807 East Indiana Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
H A N S 0 N I N D U S T R I E S, I N C.(~) 922-5252 • Fax (509) 922-5757 ~o~. coLn ~.,vG,n,EFR
~ E-mail: adminQhansonind.com
August 13, 2002
Mr. John Holrnan
Spokane County Engineer
1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spoka:ne, Washington 99260-0179
I
Re: Hanson Center East
I inprovement Bond
Dear I✓Ir. Holman:
We are requesting the above referenced bond be reduced to the ten percent (10%)
maintenance amount.
The Bond was previously reduccd to $166,400 from $834,500 by the enclosed
Surety Rider dated January 10, 2002.
The work was recently finalized and accepted by your office.
Please review and advise.
Sincerely,
~
G I~
,
Robert J. Boyle Vice President ~
J /-/23
i
S P O K A N E ~ . C O U N T Y
DNISION OP ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OP THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEIVT
_ November 30, 2001
Insurance Co. of the State of PA
PO Box 2151
Spokane, WA 99210
Re: Hanson Center East (P 1504B)
Bond # 22-45-64 - Hanson Industries Inc.
Dear Sir or Madam:
We have received a request to reduce the above referenced bond to reflect the current
status of construction. Although Spokane County is under no obligation to reduce any
surety it holds, we have elected to allow a reduction from the original amount of
$834,500.00 to $166,400.00. Consideration of any fia.rther reductions will likely be based
on continuous construction progress toward completion and acceptance of the public
roads.
If you have any questions please contact our department.
Sincerely, .
kf~w
John Hohman, PE
Development Services Engineer/Manager
Cc: Hanson Industries Inc.
File
1026 W. Broadway Ave. 9 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) ~ TDD: (509) 477-7133
♦ / _
~P1504B - Hanson Center East
construction inspection
Indiana Avenue $135,100.00 $15,200.00
Tract A Drainage $111900.00 $300.00
Tract B Drainage $3,600.00 $300.00
construction inspection
subtotal $150,600.00 $15,800.00
tota I $1669400.00
Reduction 11 /30% I
^ \1
\1 ` ~
BOND ESTIiVWTE Retluction 11/30J01
PROJECT P1504B - Indiana Avenue % Retained by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 31-Jan-02
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 0.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 0.00
6) Backfill For DW CY 0.00
7) Drainage Structures, installed
164+70 RT 10% EA 145.00
164+69 LT 10% EA 145.00
166+45 LT 10% EA 133.00
186+88 RT 10% EA 145.00
186+88 LT 10% EA 145.00
186+60 LT 10% EA 145.00
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 0.00
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type 1 EA 0.00
7b) WSDOT Intet Box 8 Grate EA 0.00
8) PVC pipe 18" 10% LF 130.00 27.00 351.00
9) CMP pip8 24" 10°!o LF 29.00 30.00 87.00
10) PVC Pipe 24" 10°k LF 139.00 32.00 445.00
11) Corr. HOPE 24" 10% LF 72.00 28.00 202.00
12) Smooth HOPE 24" 1046 LF 190.00 34.00 646.00
12) Precast Manhole ~ EA 0.00
13) Solid lid EA 0.00
14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 0.00
15) Seed SF 0.00
16) Ripap outfall pad LS 0.00
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlei EA 0.00
2) Erosion Protection - silt fence 100% LS 1.00 3000.00 3000.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry 10% LS 1.00 2000.00 200.00
4) Pipe Outfall End wall 8 Grate EA 2.00 500.00 1000.00
5) 0.00
g) 0.00
DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 6789.00
16) Monuments 100% EA 5.00 185.00 925.00
17) Barricade LF 0.00
18) Street Signs EA 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 925.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK
19) Rough Grade 10% CY 9917.00 10.00 8817.00
20) Top Course CY 0.00
21) Base Course 10% CY 5573.33 25.00 13933.00
22) Asphalt Concrete 10% Tons 4904.53 46.00 22561.00
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B 10% LF 6130.00 7.00 4291.00
25) Curb Type R LF 0.00
26) Sidewalk 100% SQ YD 4086.67 16.00 65386.67
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
1) Cross gutter SQ YD 0.00 0.00
2) Type III Barricade 10% LF 66.00 12.00 79.00
g) 0.00
q) 0.00
GRADING AND SURFACING 115067.67
$122,781.67
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $135,059.83
use $135,100.00
Private inspection:
STI quote 4500.00
Inspedron $15, 200.00
use $15,200.00
~ BOND ESTIMATE Reduciion 11/30/01
Y PROJECT P1504B - Tract A Drainage % Retained by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 31-Jan-02
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B 10% EA 2.00 2000.00 400.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Gtate - Type 4 10% EA 2.00 275.00 55.00
6) Backfill For DW 10% CY 80.00 16.50 132.00
7) Drafnage Structures, installed
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA
7b) WSDOT Inlet Box 8 Grate EA 0.00
8) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00
9) ADS n-12 Pipe 24" Dia. LF 0.00
9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00
10) CMP 18" Dia. LF 0.00
11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00
12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00
13) Solid lid EA 0.00
14) Ditch arzd Pond Excavation 10% CY 7638.89 12.50 9549.00
15) Seed 10% SF 45900.00 0.07 321.00
16) Ripap ditch 100% CY 7.41 25.00 185.19
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 0.00
2) Erosion Protection LS 0.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 0.00
4) Pipe outlei erid grates EA 0.00
5) CY 0.00
g) 0.00
DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 10642.19
16) Monuments EA 15.00 0.00
17) garricade LF 0.00 0.00
18) Street Signs EA 2.00 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK
19) Rough Grade - Maintenance Access Road 10% CY 42.22 10.00 42.00
20) Top Caurse - Maintenance Access Road 10% CY 42.22 16.50 70.00
21) g~ ~urse CY 0.00
22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 0.00
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B LF 0.00
25) Curb Type R LF 0.00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD ~ 0.00
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
1) Cross-gutters SQ YD 0.00
2) Mass Earthworic CY
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRADING AND SURFACING 112.00
$10,754.19
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $11,829.60
use $11,900.00
rnspecna► $250.00
Private inspection: use $300.00
.
` BDIdD ESTIINATE Reduction 11130f01
PROJEC7 P1504B - Traet B orainage % Retained hy Ed ParTy. P.E. [?ATE 31-Jan-02
DRAINAGE ITEMS LJNITS QUAfVTIT1P' PRICE CC)Sfi
1} i]rywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Dryvudl - Type B 110% EA 1.00 2200.00 220.00
3} Cra#e - Type s EA 0.00
4} Griate Type 2 EA ' 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 109+6 . EA 1.00 250.00 25.00
6) BaCkfill FOt DW 10°/o CY 40.00 16.50 66.00
7} Drainage StructuFes, installed 7) COrtGrete Inle# BQbc, TYpe I EA 4.00
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA
7b} 11US DOT Inlet aoa 8 Gfate EA 0.00
CPEP Pipe 1U" ❑ia. LF 4.00
9) AC]S n-12 Pipe 12" aia. LF 0.00
9a) CM1P Pipe 12" Dia. LF 4.00 •
10) CMP 24" Dia. LF 4.40
11J CFEF Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00
12) Precas4 fUlanhole EA 0A0
13) Salid lid EA 0A0
,
14} Ditch and Rond Excavafion 10% CY 2232.87 12.50 2791,00
15) Seed 1o°l0 s F 13650.00 0.07 96.40
16} Ripap avtfall pad CY 8.50 0,00
16) R[pM di#Gh, 12" depth CY 0.00 0.00
16} Ripap ditch, 18" depth CY 0•00 0.00
NON STANoARO aRArNAGE IT'EMS
1} Wilbert Vault Curb lrtlet ~ 0•00
2} Erosion Pro#ection L5 0.00
3} ErosFQn PsAection -RoCk entry L5 0.00
4) 0.00
5) 0.00
6) 0.00
QRAIhIAGE SL1BT4TAL 3198.00
1$) ftiJfpnumentS EA ' 0.00
17) BarriCade LF 0.100
18) S#reet Signs E4 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.104
GRADING, SURFACfIdG, CLJRB,14ND S14JEWALK
19} Raugh Grade 10°la CY 11.11 70.00 11.00
20} Top Gaurse 10°!o Cl' 11.11 16.50 98.04
21) sase Course cY 0.00
22) ASphakt CancFete Tons 0_00
23} Curb Type A ~ LF 0.00
24} Curb Type B LF 0.00
25} Cvrb Type R LF 0.00
26} Sidewaik SQ Y❑ 0.00
NQhI-STANDARD ROAQ ITEMS
1} Cross-gutters Sfl YD 0.00
2) 0.00
3) 0.00
4) 0.0.0
'
GRADICVG ANa SURFAGIh1G 29.00
$3,227,04
CONS7RUCTIOPJ TOTAL, INCLLJDING MULTIPLIER OF 7.70 $3,549.70
use $3,600.0
noie: Sf! tatal quate =$7800 fbr projed Inspectr'nrt $250.00
USe $30D.00
_ j , . • ' • e
0
A"
AIU Insurance Company . •
American Home Assurance Company - American International Companies
Granite State Insurance Compeny Principal Bond Office
Illinois National Insurance Company
The Insurance Company of the Stete of Pennsylvania 175 Water Street, New York, N.Y. 10038
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA
New Hampshire Insurence Company .
Commerce and Industry Insurance Company - . '
Commerce and Industry Insurance Company of Caneda
.
SURETY RIDER
To be attached to and form a part of Bond No. 2245-64 dated November 14, 2000
executed by Hanson Industries. Inc. ~ as Priucipal, and
SiDokane Countv Engineers , as Obligee.
In consideration of the premium charged, it is understood and agreed that, effective on November 30, 2001 ,
Bond amount reduced from $834,500 to $166,400
Provided, however, that the liability of the Surety under the attached bond aod under the attached bond as changed by this
rider shall not be cumulative.
Nothing herein contained shall be held to vary, waive, alter or extend any of the terms, conditions, agreements or warranties of
the above-mentioned bond, other than as stated above.
Signed, sealed and dated Januarv 10, 2002 _
Hanson Industries, Inc. .
(Principal) (Seal). AccePted: BY V 1. d,
(Title) '
Spokane County EnQineers Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
(Obligee) (Surety)
By By
(Title) U Attomey-in-Fact - Lea
~
~ .
' The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania POWER OF ATTORNEY
Principal Bond Office: 70 Pine Street, h'ew York, N.Y. 10270
No. 13-E-515-23-3652
KiNOW ALL M_EN QY THESE YEtESENTS: That The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, a Fennsylvania corporation, does hereby appoint
---l.eah Cripe: of Seattle, 11'asliington---
its tiue and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact; with fiill authorit~y to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other contracts
of indemniry and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business, and to bind the company thereby.
Tv NNrITNrESS «'HEREOF, The insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania has executed these presents ,
this Sth day of July, 2000.
awrence W. Carlstrom, Vice President
STATE OF NEW YORK
COU`iTl' OF NEVV YORK}ss. On this 5tll day of July, 2000 before me came the above named
officer of The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania,
to me personally known to be the individual and ofCcer M Tarioq .
described tierein, and acknowledged that he executed the NOYPubk, Steto of New }ork
foregoing instniment and affixed the seal of said coiporation NQ 02TA60W886
thereto by autbority of his office. Ww"m 14tY
, 2002
CERTIFICAI'E
Excerpts of Resolution adopted by the Board of Direciors of I'he Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, on ivlay 18, 1976:
"RESOT.VF_.D, that the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President be, and hereby is, authorized to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact to
represent and act for and on behalf of the Company to e.r•ecute bonds; undertakings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and ~vritings
obiigatory in the nature thereof, and to attach thereto the corporate seal of the Company, in the transaction of its surety business;
"RESOLVED, that the signatures and attestations of such officers and the seal oFthe Company rnay be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any
certificate rPlating ;hercto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attomey or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimiie seal shall be valid
and binding upon the Company when so affixed with respect to any bond, undertaking, recognizance or other contract of indemnity or writing
obligatory in the nature thereof;
"RESOLVED, that any such Attorney-in-E'act delivering a secretarial certification that the foregoing resolutions still be in effect rnay insert in such
certification the date thereof, said date to be not later than the date of delivery thereof by such Attomey-in-Fact."
l, Elizabeth M. Tuck, Secretary of The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing excerpts of Resolution
adopted by the Board of Directors of this corporation, and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and correct, and that both the
Resolution and the Power of Attomey are in full force and effect.
I\' W(T`'ESS WHEREOF, I have hercunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of the corporation
this day ofLJfLifIMr~
Elizabeth M. Tuck, Secretary
23238 (4/99)
~
, i~
,
L
' ~ ✓ ` F~Ec. ,IVED /Ilitlkl,
Nov ' S lEg ROADVVAY IMPROVEMENT BOND No. 22-45-64
'l'OKtiNE U-OUNTY ENGINEER
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that Hanson Industries, Inc. (developer), as "Principal," and The Insurance
Company of the State of Pennsylvania (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Massachusetts and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as "Surety" are held and
firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of
58349500.00 (Eight Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Construction:
$8189700.00 Eight Hundred Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Indiana Avenue $666,700.00 (Six Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract A Drainage $116,500.00 (One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract B Drainage $ 35,500.00 (Thirty-Five Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Inspection:
$15,800.00 (Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Indiana Avenue $ 15,200.00 (Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars
Tract A Drainage $ 300.00 (Three Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract B Drainage $ 300.00 (Three Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, said Principal is the developer of a tract of land in Spokane County known as Hanson Ceoter East
(Spokane County Project No. P1504B) and being located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M.,
in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a Performance Bond be fumished in an amount
sufficient to pay the construction cost of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, drainage control and/or
paving of roadways adjacent to said development, and such other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, as well as
all in accordance with the accepted plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office and Spokane County Road
Department specifications dated April 1999, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such improvements
to be completed within one (1) year or less from the date of plan acceptance unless said time period be extended at
the option and with the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer; and
WHEREAS said County has required that a Performance Bond be fumished in an amount sufficient to pay the
cost of construction inspection and testing for roadway and storm drainage construction of said development, and such
other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with the accepted plans on file at the Spokane County
Engineer's office, and services to be completed within one (1) year or less from the date of plan acceptance unless
said time period be extended at the option and with the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer; and
THEREFORE, upon failure of Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized,
and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the
extent of this Bond; and
THEREFORE, the obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect, until, in the opinion of the
Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee,
the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. Surety hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except
as stated herein.
t
I
-
SIGNED AND SEALED this 14te of November, 2000.
BONDING C4MPANY: THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Address: P. 0. BOX 2151
City, State: SPOKANE, WA
Zip Code: 99210
•
Phone 509-358-39M
By:
v v
Title: W. W. WELLER, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
PRINCIPAL (Developer): HANSON INDUSTRIES. INC. /y '
r ~ .
15102 E. INDIANA AVENUE /
Address:
City, State: SPOKANE, WA
Zip Code: 99216 Phone 509-922--5252
(To be notarized by PRINCIPAL(s) and SUREM
(1) For acknowledgment i» an individual capaciry -
State of Washington )
)ss
County of Spokane )
I certify that I know or have satisfacto evidence that CA 50•1~ is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowle ed t~kis instrument and acknowledged it to be (his✓her) free and
voluntary act for the uses and pwposesI'~ ~rument. ,
• O,.•~;.~:~7 .r~,. I~
Dated
ta& Public in and
.
(P*. v•' . or-t$e State of Washington
~ G y J. ppointment Expires:
,
~
(2) for an acknowledgment in a rep~esenta~lSl~qc~Ao'~ ~
State of Washington )
)ss
County of Spokane )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that W. W. WELLER is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (helshe) was authorized
to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ATTORNEY-IN-FACT of
THF. TNSU ANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument. ~I,~;
a~N. : r . .N,9 _
Dated NOVEMBER 14, 2000
cl' ot~y Public in and JoANNE TONANI
for t& State of Washington
Iro ;A;•, ~ I~►~_Sppointment Expires: 7/ 15 / O 1
ii'y~;~G~ y l J ~DO.
. ~
~1111111
"I'he i>>; iiraiy~cc Conipany, of the `e of Pennsylvania POtiN'ER Or ATTOK\ CY
, I';incir.ti l3ond U;'licc: 70 I'iitc Strrct. Ncxv 1`, .4.Y. 10370
No. i 3-a-o7362
Ivti'OW ALL A-IE\ 131' 'I'EILSE PRESCN'1'S:
Thzt Thc: Insurance Conipan~~ of the State of Pennsylvania, a pennsylvania corporation, does hereby appoint
NVui Dinnccii, W W NN`cllcr, Lois Stewart, Joannc Tonani, Carla flolt, Gcorge C. Schrocdcr, Chris Larson,
Char•fa N-1. Buadlc: of Spokane, Washi»gton---
ies true and lawful Altorney(s)-in-Fact, with full authority to execute on its bEhalf bonds, undertakings, reco-gnizances and other
contracts of indemni(y aiui writings obligatory in the rlature thereof, issued in the course of its business, and to binci che company
thcrEby.
I\' NVITNrSS WHEREOF, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania has executed these presents
this 8th day of June, 2000
.i~ ~
j ~
~1~.'
C/ Lawrence W. Carlstrom, Vice President
S'CATE ON' NEW Y ORK }
CQU\'TY OF N-E1V YORK}ss.
%l
On this 8th day of Junc, 2000 before me came the above
named officer of The Insurance Company of the State of /
Peiliisylvania, to me pcrsonally known to be the individual and ~TqYLOA
orficer described herein, and acl:nowledged that he executed Notary~ ~U M. yoft
the foregoing instrument and affixed the seal of said Mm
corporation thereto by authority of his office. c~ ~~~t6otrr~
20%
CERTIFICATE
I:xcc:i•pts of IZesolulion adopted by the Board of Directors of The [nsurancc Company of the State of I'ennsyIvania, on Niay 13, 1976:
"RLSOLVED, that the Chairman of the 13oard, the I'residcnt; or any Vice President bc, and hereby is, authorized to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact tu
represent and act for ancl on behalf of the Company to execute bonds, undertal:ings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and writings
oblieatory in the nature thcreof, and to attach thercto the corporate seal of the Company, in the transaction of its surety business;
"RLSOLVFt), that the sianaturcs and attcstations of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to anv such Power of attorney or to any
certilica(e relatino thereto by facsimile, and any such Powcr oFAttorney or certificate bearing such faesimile sisnatures or facsimile seal shall be valid
ancf binding upon the Company whcn so af'tixed with respect tu any bond, undertaking, recognizance ur other contract of indernnitv ur uritin~
ohli~,ator) in the nature thereof; ~
"ItE50LVEU, that an), such Attarney-in-I"act delivering a secretarial eertification that the foregoing resolutions still be in cffect may IiISCf( Itl such
ccrtilicatian the date thereof, said datc to be not later than the date of delivery thereof by such Attorney-in-Fact."
I, F:liiabcth Ni. Tuck. Sccretar>> uf' The Insurance Cumpany of the State of Pennsylvania; do hercby certify that the foreQoine excerp[s of' Ittsolutiun
adoptcd by the 13oard of Directors of this corporation, anci the Power of Attorney issued pursuant therrto, are truc ancl correct. an(i that butli thc
Itc,uluiion anci the I'ower ofAttornty are in t'ull lorcc and cffect.
IN \VI'I'NL:SS Wi•fLR1:0F. I have hercunto sct rny hand and affixed the facsimile seal of the corporatian
chis 14thday oi November , 2000
i
- ~Ur.~~~~'(~ • l' f~',,,s;.
zabeth I~l. Tuck, Sccrctary
,jl (,1 ,
(11)~ j Eli
4' .
......v .~osv~..~u~~J. aia~.. WJ UUl
_.IMIW:r.e;........--~i.° .
~i~_ 7~ - - -,=++.i.
. . . a . -
. . . .
- ...:.:..~._.:t.:..: ~ ~
.
::~oka~~i?e;:1tiA:9~2vA=:- ~.~(~9j~~58=b~a4, fai~::~.~:~ ~ I I v G~C~ t j~ :~~.EA5~ Vo t D
~ . . . . . .
. .
. . .
. . . . . . . .
:
. . . . . . ~ . . . - FAX TRANS
M ITTA
L
.
i ~
.
:
.
.
:
DATE: P NCLUDINC COVER SHEET
-
.
. .
~ . ..A.. .
. . .
To: . . ...~l~.'r. Faac: ~7`7-7~55 -
.v. . .
..U .
COMPANY: PHONE: _
~a•~~:•w~~~'s••w.vu...v.Ynvns:~v~._.vi.:.v~vm~~tiM1•.i~~~/'-•,v.:r:nt.__ ..a_tiv+...r •...:.~Jn.n'h'~n~.t::•.~.~~ti:....c:•....~nv~~~~..V•.w~.......`..w....v.... • .~.v.~..v..n4.. v~ ~~w.~ww
- ~ ao ..,.............,,N,~.....
.a FROnn ~'~~-j . . Jvas.......................... < 73
PROJ ECT t-
ORIGINAL IN MAIL: OYES ONO ~
IVOTES:
~
. ~ ,
~
. :
:
,
~
~ ConTdentialitv Noliee ~
Tttis documEnt(s) axortVanying this fax transmission oortain(s) Entormatlm, which is canfrdentiat and pfin'leged. This information is +ntended to be for the
individual or entRy s►et fath ahove. tf you arE not tlie intended recipiert, please be aarare that atry dPsclOSwe, capying, disttibution ar use ot the canterts of this
iMomnation is prohibited. Thank yau.
NOU-10-2000 16:09 509 458 6844 94% P.01
- - _ . ~vv~.....
• ~ . n' .
~
•
t,JNfT
~ L Lps; SCJAZ t prroNJ ,
_ _ ...._y~._..-~,, _ ~ - - - -
_ .___.._1• ~ 77Y)°F ~3_' ___.~r~.~v.~~c.~s.... 3 _
,
.
};'-Tl--L$ ,
~t►
Ll~
V A -r1 (2 t---
,
:5 •
e. --.-•-~-~/a~ ~ ' / ~ /~~a~r`~/~.f~'~i'~_ ~~Y ' L.~._.._-__. ~ ~_r...r.'_"_~........--._., .._.~rli~
- . 'J ^ « ~ •
. ~
2, M
ff ig ~ y
;
39
L.....
,
. ,
~i4- P-
~ .
4'~i~l~
T •
~ • ....w.~_.___._._~...~_-..__.....~_
NOV-10--2000 16=09 509 458 6844 94% P.02
. .
"I
P1504B - Hanson Center East o oa
construction inspection
. m
Ir~diana Auenue $68&,704.0-0 $15,200.00 ~ ~
rn
ti
-u „
G~► a
3
Tract A Drainage $116,500.04 $300.00 ~ m
:z
0
0
~
~
~
Tract 8. Qrainage $35,500.00 $300.00 ~ ~ n T O
x
construction inspection
,
subtotal $818,700.00 $15,800.00 ~ -
-
~
:
totaa $834,500.00 P.
~
Note: quantities are based on CLC's 10 Nov 00 transmittal
and th8 25 Oct 00 plan submiftal.
BOND ESTIMATE
PROJECT P15046 - Indiana Avenue by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Nov-00
ORAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 0.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 0.00
6) Backfill For DW CY 0.00
7) Drainage Structures, installed
164+70 RT EA 1450.00
164+69 LT EA 1450.00
166+45 LT EA 330.0` ~l 6~~
186+88 RT EA T490.00
186+88 LT EA 1450.00
186+60 LT EA 1450_00
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 0.00
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA 0.00
7b) WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA 0.00
8) PVC pipe 18" LF 130.00 27.00 3510.00
9) CMP pipe 24" LF 29.00 30.00 870_00
10) PVC Pipe 24" LF 139.00 32.00 4448.00 3S ~
11) Corr. HDPE 24""' I LF 72.00 28.00 2016.00
12) Smooth HDPE 24" LF 190.00 34.00 6460.00 Y6'
12; Precast Manhole " EA 0.00'"
13 Solid lid EA 0.00
14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 0.00 '
15) Seed SF 0.00
16) Ripap outfall pad LS 0.00
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
- - - - - - -
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 0.00
2) Erosion Protection - silt fence LS 1.00 3000.00 3000.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00
4) Pipe Outfall End wall & Grate EA 2.00 500.00 1000.00
5) • 0.00
6) 0.00
ORAINAGE SUBTOTAL 31884.00
16) Monuments EA 5.00 185.00 925.00
17) Barricade LF 0.00
18) Street Signs . EA 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 925.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK
19) Rough Grade CY 9917.00 10.00 99170.00
20) Top Course CY 0.00
21) Base Course CY 5573.33 25.00 139333.33
22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 4904.53 46.00 225608.53
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B LF 6130.00 7.00 42910.00
25) Curb Type R LF 0 00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD 4086.67 16.00 65386 67
-
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
1) Cross gutter SQ YD 0 00 0.00
2} Type III Barricade LF 66 00 12.00 792.00
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRAOING AND SURFACING 573200.53
$606,009.53
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $666,610.49
use $666,700.00
Private inspection:
STI quote 4500.00
Inspection $15,200.00
use $15,200.00
Indiana Avenue Quantities
Grading top floor avg depth Volume 0.00 cubic ft
0.00 cubic yards sodlseed 0.00 sf
0.00 sy seed
L W1 W2 T qty
Riprap at pipe outfall 40+43 0.00
0.00
stop start width
Road 18800.00 15760.00 66.04
Indiana Avenue 3040.00 200640.00 sf
tangent inches feet
ex 1.08 217360,00 cf 8050.37 cy
base 9.00 0.75 150480.00 cf 5573.33 cy
acp 4.00 0.33 66880.00 cf 4904.53 tons
cul-de-sac radius area
0.00 0.00 sf ,
ex 1.08 1.00 0.00 cf 0.00 cy
base 0.50 0.00 cf 0.00 cy
acp 0.00 cf 0.00 tons
Rough Grading, CY raw qtys finished
cut 0.00
fill 0.00
9917.00 total per CLC estimate
curb length Type B # sides sum
tangent 6130.00 ex 8050.37
returns 0.00 base 5573.33
Cul-de-sac acp 4904.53
total 6130.00
sidewalk tangent 6130.00 ,
return 0.00
cul-de-sac 0.00
6,00 6130.00 36780.00 sf
4086.67 sy
inspection 30.40 stations 500.00 per station 15200.00
PVC pipe 18" 130.00
CMP pipe 24" 29.00
PVC Pipe 24" 139.00 Con. HDPE 24° 72.OO~Zitc
Smoorh HDPE 24" 190.00
Drainage Structures
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total •
164+70 RT WSDOT Type II 1,00 • 630.00 685.00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
164+69 LT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685.00 40.00 725,00 725.00 1450.00
4' base top slab frame & grate subtotal wltax delivery total installation total
166+45 LT 46"MH- 1.00 1.00 1.00 575,00 625.00 40.00 665.00 665.00 1330.00
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total 164+70 RT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685.00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
186+88 RT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685,00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
186+88 LT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685.00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
Cross gutter LF
0.00 SQ YD
~ "~!S i ~
~ [3 ~ ~~s~ ~
IL
~
BOND ESTIM.
PROJECT P1504B - Tract A Drainage by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Nov-00
-
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 2.00 2000.00 4000.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 2.00 275.00 550.00
6) Backfill For DW CY 80.00 16.50 1320.00
7) Drainage Structures, installed
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA
7a) Sidewaik Inlet, Type I E,q
7b) WSDOT Inlet Box 8 Grate EA 0.00
8) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00
9) ADS n-12 Pipe 24" Dia. LF 0.00
9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00
10) CMP 18" Dia. LF 0.00
11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00
12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00
13) Solid lid EA 0.00
14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 7638.89 12.50 95486.11
15) Seed SF 45900.00 0.07 3213.00
16) Ripap ditch CY 7.41 25.00 185.19
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 0.00
2) Erosion Protection LS 0.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 0.00
4) Pipe outlet end grates EA 0.00
5) CY 0.00
6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 104754.30
16) Monuments EA 15.00 0.00
17) Barricade LF 0.00 0.00 -
- 18) Street Signs EA 2.00 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK •
19) Rough Grade - Maintenance Access Road CY 42.22 10.00 422.22
20) Top Course - Maintenance Access Road CY 42.22 16.50 696.67
21) Base Course CY . 0.00
22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 0.00
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 0.00
25) Curb Type R LF 0.00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD 0.00
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
1) Cross-gutters SQ YD 0.00
2) Mass Earthworlc CY
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRADING AND SURFACING 1118.89
$105,873.19
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $116,460.50
use $116,500.00
Inspection $250.00
Private inspection: use $300.00
Tract A Drainage Quantities Grading •
top floor avg depth Volume 45900.00 9100.00 7.50 7638.89 CY
Seeding 45900.00 sf
5100.00 sy
L UV1 W2 T qty
(note outfalls are into riprapped ditch
Riprap at pipe outfall 20.00 6.00 14.00 1.00 7.41
7.41
Maintenance Access Roa L W T
190.00 12.00 0.50 42.22
BOND EST, E
PROJECT P1504B - Tract B Drainage by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Nov-00 Y
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 1.00 2200.00 2200.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 1.00 250.00 250 00
6) Backfill For DW CY 40.00 16.50 660.00
7) Drainage Stnuctures, installed
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 0.00
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA
7b) WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA , 0.00
8) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00
9) ADS n-12 Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00
9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00
10) CMP 24" Dia. LF 0.00
11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00
12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00
13) Solid lid EA 0.00
14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 2232.87 12.50 27910.88
15) Seed SF 13650.00 0.07 955.50
16) Ripap outfall pad CY 6.50 0.00
16) Ripap ditch, 12" depth CY 0.00 0.00
16) Ripap ditch, 18" depth CY 0.00 0.00
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
-
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 0.00
2) Erosion Protection LS 0.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 0.00
4) 0.00
5) 0.00
6) 0.00
DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 31976.38
16) Monuments EA 0.00
17) Barricade LF 0.00
18) Street Signs EA 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK :
19) Rough Grade CY 11.11 10.00 111.11
20) Top Course CY 11.11 16.50 183.33
21) Base Course CY 0.00
• 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons - 0.00
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B LF 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 0.00
26) Sidewalk , SQ YD 0.00
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
1) Cross-gutters SQ YD 0.00
2) 0.00
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRADING AND SURFACING 294.44
$32,270.82
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $35,497.91
use $35,500.00
note: STI total quote =$7800 for project Inspection $250.00
use $300.00
I
Tract B Drainage Quantities '
Grading
top floor avg depth Volume
13650.00 4900.00 6.50 2232.87 CY
Seeding 13650.00 sf
1516.67 sy
L W1 W2 T qty
Riprap at pipe outfall 18.00 6.00 13.50 1.00 6.50
6.50 cy
Maintenance Access Roac L W T
50.00 12.00 0.50 11,11
BOND ESTIMATE
PROJECT P1504B - Indiana Avenue by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Nov-00
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 0.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 0.00
6) Backfill For DW CY 0.00
7) Drainage Structures, instalied
164+70 RT EA 1450.00
164+69 LT EA 1450.00
166+45 LT EA 1330.00
186+88 RT EA 1450.00
186+88 LT EA 1450.00
. 186+60 LT EA 1450 00
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 0 00
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA ' 0.00
7b) WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA , 0.00
8) PVC pipe 18" LF 130.00 27 00 3510.00
9) CMP pipe 24" LF 29.00 30.00 870.00
10) PVC Pipe 24" LF 139.00 32.00 4448 00
11) Corr. HDPE 24" LF 72.00 28.00 2016.00
12) Smooth HDPE 24" LF 190 00 34.00 6460.00
12) Precast Manhole EA 0 00
13) Solid lid EA 0 00
14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 0.00
15) Seed ' SF 0.00 0.00
16) Ripap outfall pad LS 1.00 0.00
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 0.00 0.00
2) Erosion Protection - silt fence LS 1.00 3000.00 3000.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00
4) 0.00
5) 0.00
6) 0.00
, DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL . 30884.00
16) Monuments EA 5.00 185.00 925.00
17) Barricade LF 0.00
18) Street Signs EA 1.00 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 925.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK
19) Rough Grade CY 9917.00 10 00 99170.00 -
20) Top Course CY 0.00
21) Base Course CY 5573.33 16.50 91960.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 4904.53 46.00 225608.53
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B LF 6130.00 8 50 52105.00
25) Curb Type R LF - 0.00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD 4086 67 9 50 38823.33
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
1) Cross gutter SQ YD 0.00 0.00
2) Type III Barricade LF 66.00 0.00
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRADING AND SURFACING 507666.87
. S539,475.87
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 S593,423.45
use $593,500.00
Private inspection:
t
t
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
TO: CHAD COLES
FROM: DAVE BERTO
DATE: May 10, 2001
SUBJECT : BOND ITEMS HANSON CENTER EAST
The bond for the above-mentioned project is for the
following items:
1) Al1 the items on the approved road and drainage plans.
" 11l10/00 16.07 FAX 509 458 6844 CLC Assvcfates, Inc. ao81
~ • .`-al..~~~i.~.: - - ~
_ - .
^ . , . .
::f, " ' ' • SF:l~itirtF'.~:.:JiL3. -
'1" " ii1i.I~•..6ili+~d~i~.cca~~~ :
' ' • . • T^' ' ' '~...r r~~ . . . E ' .
-:~kwc-a-~'i,_sa:~~•~~°-_~~:~_~ : ~ "
- - _ - ~ _ . • ho
, 11~' D ' V~-~`A5~ 0 1 D
;..:m.E..:
ft
. , .
- .r - - - . .
FAac rRANSMETrAL
DATE: PAIGES- I NCLuDiNc COVER SHECT
. .
. . .
.k.,_................
.
. .
. . .
~
. . .
.
Ta: F~c. :
. .
. . .
. .
. - ' ~ 7
~ ~ ~
..,......,...._.....~-._.....,..,...R.---...~_~._.._..
COr►~~~ANY; P14ONE:
.
~
: -
FROM.
j~
:
.R..........~ . .
rP.Oj Wr
ORIGfNAL IN MAIL: CFYES EINO ; .
NDTES: j . ~
67 &.,,f . ad--3&
~
~
. : ~
n -
i
~
• ~ .
~
e
~
[
r ~
L
Co11~~ential}tv N0i1Ce ~
TivS dommertt(s) wmvnykrng tftis fai ftrwm'ts~m cmuin(~) mfomraton, whuh is cWidurffli~arw p&fieqw. 7h~s inforrrtatian ds hs#ended tio be fGe the
indMdual ar enft sei " *we. t# you aFe rtot ft 6rrkended tsoioK pesse be awara tlnat any dlo;*swe, copong, distrW►on vr uuc o! #he owberts cf ttxis
igorrnadm b pmhbW llwk you. . a~~~..~..~.,~
N€lU-iO-2000 16.09 5B9 459 6$44 94% P. Oi
i
- - - - - - - ~
l - • ~ - . f ~ ~ {a,,. ~v~
0.
t
7W A~a ~ . , . - . .
~
iv p LF r(,
4
72• tr
.
. . :7 • ~ ° ~ - • ~ -
~ ~ ~ no
r~
' . d~]A r •F
' ~d~G ~ ' ' , ' • , ` r',
, . . . - . _ . , • , ,
• ~ ' 2A f-~ ~ ~ ° . . . . . ~ . • . - ' • .
Jr~ ~ OP,
" • ~ - ~ ~ ' . , . ~ -
_
.
• ~ ~ • ~
i
~ ~
~Y."`..~~R ~,~~^'w w• ~:tt• l
, ~ • f ~ ; t~~ 1 1
s, ~4~•-5 ~l~ I "'S . ~ ~ Z
P1504B - Hanson Center East
VotFJli-iAVYiVYf' inspeclii/1'1 ~G~' ; ,r~ .`9'~1~ ~L yk ; ~•"a Y'~'~,~ TO C
T
Indiana. A~-eraue $666,744.00 $15,244.40 ~°~'y~ n
,~.~,;n,-s'v~~~~, • ` ~ ` _O~ ~
7ract A Drainage $116,544.00 $300.00.
0
J
Q1
~
; o,
Tr.act B. Dcainage $35,500.00 $3aQ.4Q , C"
I X ~ ~ p
O ~
construction inspection
subtoW $818,740.40- $45,800.00 ~ ~ • ~
N
total $834,500.00 i P. '
~
I
Note: quantities are based on CLC's 10 Nov 00 transmittal
and the 25 Oc# 00 plan- sUbmital. ~
.
.
.
. BOND ESTIMATE - - `
PROJECT P1504B - Indiana Avenue by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Nov-00
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 0.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 0.00
6) Backfill For DW CY 0.00
7) Drainage Structures, installed
164+70 RT EA 1450.00
164+69 LT EA 1450.00
166+45 LT EA 330. kv7D
186+88 RT EA 0.00
186+88 LT EA 1450.00
186+60 LT EA 1450.00
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 0.00
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA 0 00
7bj WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA 0.00
8) PVC pipe 18" LF 130.00 27.00 3510 00
9) CMP pipe 24" LF 29.00 30.00 870.00
10) PVC Pipe 24" LF 139.00 32.00 4448.00 3S .
11) Corr. HDPE 24"~ a LF 72.00 28.00 2016.00 g
12) Smooth HDPE 24" LF 190.00 34.00 6460 00
12} Precast Manhole ` EA 0.00'
13) Solid lid EA 0.00
14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 0.00 ~
15) Seed SF 0.00
16) Ripap outfall pad LS 0 00
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
- - - - - - -
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 0.00 ,
2) Erosion Protection - silt fence LS 1.00 3000.00 3000.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00
4) Pipe Outfall End wall & Grate EA 2.00 500.00 1000.00
5) 0.00
6) 0.00
- - - -
DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 31884.00
- - -
16) Monuments EA 5.00 185.00 925.00
17) Barricade LF 0.00
18) Street Signs EA 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 925 00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK
19) Rough Grade CY 9917.00 10.00 99170.00
20) Top Course CY 0.00
21) Base Course CY 5573.33 25.00 139333.33
22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 4904.53 46.00 225608.53
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B LF 6130.00 7.00 42910.00
25) Curb Type R LF 0.00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD 4086.67 16.00 65386.67
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
-
1) Cross gutter SQ YD 0.00 0.00
2) Type III Barricade LF 66.00 12.00 792.00
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRADING AND SURFACING 573200.53
$606,009.53
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $666,610 49
use $666,700.00
Private inspection.
STI quote 4500.00
Inspection $15,200.00
use $15,200.00
Indiana Avenue Quantities ~
Grading
top floor avg depth Volume
0.00 cubic ft
0.00 cubic yards
sodlseed 0.00 sf
0.00 sy seed
L W1 W2 T qty Riprap at pipe outfall 40+43 0.00
0.00
stop start width
Road 18800.00 15760.00 66.00
Indiana Avenue 3040.00 200640.00 sf ,
tangent inches feet ex 1.08 217360.00 cf 8050.37 cy
base 9.00 0.75 150480.00 cf 5573.33 cy
acp 4.00 0.33 66880.00 cf 4904.53 tons
cul-de•sac radius area
0.00 0.00 sf
ex 1.08 1.00 0.00 cf 0,00 cy
base 0.50 0.00 cf 0,00 cy
acp 0.00 cf 0,00 tons
Rough Grading, CY raw qtys finished
cut 0.04
fill 0.00
9917.00 total per CLC estimate ,
curb length Type B # sides sum
tangent 6130.00 ex 8050.37
returns 0.00 base 5573.33
Cul-de-sac acp 4904.53
tota► 6130.00
sidewalk tangent 6130.00
retum 0.00
cul-de-sac 0,00
6.00 6130.00 36780.00 sf
4086.67 sy
inspection 30.40 sta6ons 500.00 per station 15200.00
PVC pipe 18" 130.00
CMP pipe 24" 29.00
PVC Pipe 24" 139.00
Corr. HDPE 24" 72.00~2.1« ~ ~'GIq}{fits~
Smoorh HDPE 24" 190.00
Drainage Structures
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
164+70 RT WSOOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685,00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
164+69 LT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685,00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
4' base top slab frame & grate subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
166+45 LT 1.00 1.00 1.00 575.00 625.00 40.00 665.00 665.00 1330.00
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
164+70 RT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685.00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00 base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
186+88 RT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685.00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
base,H ring, grate J ring K ring subtotal w/tax delivery total installation total
186+88 LT WSDOT Type II 1.00 630.00 685.00 40.00 725.00 725.00 1450.00
Cross gutter LF
0,00 SQ YD
C r,~A~ w~QrFi
d 3 IN ~W~~ ~ ~~o~ ~P~ ~ R~, -~7c~S t5 N
BOND ESTIM?,, PROJECT P1504B - Tract A Drainage by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Nov-00
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 2.00 2000.00 4000.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 2.00 275.00 550.00
6) Backfill For DW CY 80.00 16.50 1320.00
7) Drainage Structures, installed
7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA
7b) WSDOT Inlet Box 8 Grate EA 0.00
8) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00
9) ADS n-12 Pipe 24" Dia. LF 0.00
9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00
10) CMP 18" Dia. LF 0.00
11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00
12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00
13) Solid lid EA 0.00
14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 7638.89 12.50 95486.11
15) Seed SF 45900.00 0.07 3213.00
16) Ripap ditch CY 7.41 25.00 185.19
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet EA 0.00
2) Erosion Protection LS 0.00
3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 0.00
4) Pipe outlet end grates EA 0.00
5) CY 0.00
6) 0.00
DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 104754.30
16) Monuments EA 15.00 0.00
17) Barricade LF 0.00 0.00
18) Street Signs EA 2.00 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK
19) Rough Grade - Maintenance Access Road CY 42.22 10.00 422.22
20) Top Course - Maintenance Access Road CY 42.22 16.50 696.67
21) Base Course CY 0.00
22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 0.00
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B LF 0.00
25) Curb Type R LF 0.00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD 0.00
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
-
1) Cross-gutters SQ YD 0.00
2) Mass Earthwork CY
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRADING AND SURFACING 1118.89
$105,873.19
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $116,460.50
use $116,500.00
lnspection $250.00
Private inspection: use $300.00
Tract A Drainage Quantities
Grading
top floor avg depth Volume
45900.00 9100.00 7.50 7638.89 CY
Seeding 45900.00 sf
5100.00 sy
L W 1 W2 T qty
(note outfalls are into riprapped ditch
Riprap at pipe outfall 20.00 6.00 14.00 1.00 7.41 7.41
Maintenance Access Roa L W T
190.00 12,00 0.50 42.22
;
f
• ;
+ BOND ESl~Ul-
• ._Y~~~-
PROJECT P1504B - Tract B orainage by Ec4 Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Nov-00
aRAINAGE ITEMS l1AiITS QUAN717Y PRlCE COST
1} ❑rywell - Type fi EA 4.00
2} Clrywell - Type 8 EA 1.00 2200.00 2200.00
3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00
4) Grate Type 2 F_A 0.00
5} Grate - Ti ype 4 EA 9.00 250.00 250.00
6} BaCkfill Far oW CY 40_00 1 fi_50 660_00
7} Drainage Structures, installed
T} Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 0.00
7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA
7b} WSOOT Inket Bax & Gra#e EA 0.00
8} CI'EP Pipe I0" Dia. LF 0.00
9} ADS n-12 Pipe 12° dia LF 0.00
9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00
10) CMP 24" Dia. LF 0,00
11} CPEP Pipe 18" Diae LF 0,00
12) PreC.aSt Manhole EA 0,00
13) 5olid lid EA 000
14) Ditch and Pond Excavafion CY 2232.87 12.50 27910,58
15) Seed SF 93650.00 0.07 S55,50
16) Ripap outfafl pad CY 6.50 0,00
16) Ripap ditch, 12" depth GY 100 0,00
16) Ripap ditch, 18" depth CY 0_00 0,00
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
9} 1NElbert Vaul# Curh Inlet EA Q,O[}
2} Erosion Prateckion LS 0,00
3} Erosion Protectian - Rock entry LS 0,00
4} 0_0Q
5} 0,00 -
.
6) 0.00
QRAfIdfiGE SIJBTOTAL 31976.38
16} Manuments EA 0,00
17} Barrir-ade LF 0,00
18} Street Signs EA 0.00
DTHER SIJBTQ7AL 0.00
GRADING, SURFAGIIV~",, CURB, AND SIDEVIlALlC
19) Rough Grade CY 11.11 10.00 111.11 -
20}TopCourse CY 99.11 96.50 18133
21) Base Course CY 0,00
22) Asphalt Conrxete Tons 0,00
23) Curb Type A LF 0.00
24) Curb Type B LF 0.40
25) Curb Type R LF 0.0I7
26) $idewalk SO YQ 0.40
NoN-sTArvaARa RaAD iTEMS
-
1) Crass-gutters SO YD 0.00
2) 0.00
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
GRApING AND SURFAC~ING 294.44
$32,270,82
CONSTRUGTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLfER OF 9,10 $35,497,91
use $35,500.00
note: 5T1 takal quate =$7800 for pro}eck lraspect;on $250,00
use $304.00
~
=:VED
,
NOV)5 gooo R OADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND . na No. 22-45-64
SP4KANE COUNTY ENGINEER
KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that Hanson Industries, Inc. (developer), as "Principal," and The Insurance
Company of the State of Pennsylvania (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Massachusetts and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as "Surety" are held and
firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of
58349500.00 (Eight Hundred Thirty-Four Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Construction:
$8189700.00 Eight Hundred Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Indiana Avenue $666,700.00 (Six Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract A Drainage $116,500.00 (One Hundred Sixteen Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract B Drainage $ 35,500.00 (Thirty-Five Thousand Five Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Inspection:
$15,800.00 (Fifteen Thousand Eight Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars) itemized as follows:
Indiana Avenue $ 15,200.00 (Fifteen Thousand Two Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars
Tract A Drainage $ 300.00 (Three Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
Tract B Drainage $ 300.00 (Three Hundred and NO/100 US Dollars)
lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.
WHEREAS, said Principal is the developer of a tract of land in Spokane County known as Hansoo Center East
(Spokane County Project No. P1504B) and being located in Sections 12 and 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M.,
. in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a Performance Bond be furnished in an amount
sufficient to pay the construction cost of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, drainage control and/or
paving of roadways adjacent to said development, and such other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, as well as
all in accordance with the accepted plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office and Spokane County Road
Department specifications dated April 1999, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such improvements
to be completed within one (1) year or less from the date of plan acceptaoce unless said time period be extended at
the option and with the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engir►eer; and
WHEREAS said County has required that a Performance Bond be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the
cost of construction inspection and testing for roadway and storm drainage construction of said development, and such
other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with the accepted plans on file at the Spokane County
Engineer's office, and services to be compteted within one (1) year or less from the date of plan acceptance unless
said time period be extended at the option and with the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer; and
THEREFORE, upon failure of Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized,
and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the
extent of this Bond; and
THEREFORE, the obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect, until, in the opinion of the
Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee,
the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. Surety hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except
as stated herein.
' ,v~ ~ _ ••l
SIGNED AND SEALED this 14"V'~. .:`of November, 2000.
BOND[NG COMPANY: THE INSUR.ANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Address: P. 0. BOX 2151
City, State: SPOKAAIE, WA
Zip Code: 99210
P6one 509-358-39,00
sy:
Title: W. W. WELLER, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
PRINCIPAL (DeveloPer): HANSON INDUSTRIES, INC
~
15102 E. INDIANA AVENU : • - "
Address: - - . , -
-
City, State: SPOKANE, WA
Zip Code: 99216 Phone 5-04=922--~5252 `
, . t~'` r, , ,
. , (To be notarized by PRIIVCIPAL(s) and SUREM
(1) For acknowledgment in an individual capacity
State of Washington )
)ss
County of Spokane )
is the person who appeared
I certify that I know or have satisfacto evidence that CA IA'Is'd411
before me, and said person acknowle ed ed tkis instrument and acknowledged it to be (hislher) free and
voluntary act for the uses and pwposes~~ ~rument.
~`'"O. • ',;s:on~
Dated
taly Public in and
~ ✓ ` or- ~e State of Washington
~~iy~:~G! 'ppointment Expires: ~-t 5 - 0/
i~~ • • aft(2) for an acknowledgment in a rep~ese nta~~Sl ~
of ~
State of Washington ) .
)ss
County of Spokane )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that w. w. WELLER is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (helshe) was authorized
to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ATTORNEY-IN-FACT of
THF. TNSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF to be the free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes
mentioned in the instrument. ~~~T~1;
/y,9 _
Dated NOVEMBER 14, 2000 ~ . . ~
~ ot Public in and JoANNE TONANI
~ .
for t~ State of Washington
7/15/O1
~
~ J;•, 11►~ippointment Expires:
.
AS
~/1111i1``
,
The Ijisuraiijee ConA,pany of the of Pennsylvania POWER OF ATTORi~jEY
!'rincipa`I`Qond Office: 70 1'inc Strcct. Ncw Y~, A'.Y, 10270
No. 13-B-07362
Kl'OW ALL MEN BY TI-iLSE PRESENTS:
`I'hat The Insurance Company of the State of E'ennsylvania, a Pennsylvania corporation, does hereby appoint
---Wm. Dinnecn, W. W. Weller, Lois Stewart, Joanne Tonani, Carla Holt, George C. Schroeder, Chris Larson,
Charla M. Boadle: of Spokane, Washington---
its true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full auchority to execute on its behalf bonds, undertakings, recognizances and other
contracts of indemniry and writings obligatory in the nature thereof, issued in the course of its business, and to bind the company
thereby.
LN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania has executed these presents
41) this 8th day of June, 2000
.
- ~
Lawrence W. Carlstrom, Vice President
r-.
STATE OF NEW YORK }
COUNTY OF NEW YORK}ss.
On this 8th day of June, 2000 before me came the above
named officer of The Insurance Company of the State of
Peculsylvania, to me personally known to be the individual and
1WAW TAYLOA
officer described herein, and acknowledged that he executed malrYPM* skft aW,~
the foregoing instrument and affixZd the seal of said audkd In &*W
corporation thereto by authority of his office. ~~~~M F*
CERTIFICATE
Excerpts of Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, on May 18, 1976:
"RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board, the President, or any Vice President be, and hereby is, authorized to appoint Attorneys-in-Fact to
represent and act for and on behalf of the Company to execute bonds, undertal:ings, recognizances and other contracts of indemnity and Nvritings
oblieatory in the nature thereoF, and to altach thereto the corporate seal of the Company, in the transaction of its surety business;
"RESOLVEU, that the signatures and attestations of such officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed to any such Power of Attorney or to any
ccrtilicate relating thereto by facsimile, and any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signatures or facsimile seal shall be valid
and binding upon the Company when so affixed with respect to any bond, undertaking, recognizance or other contract of indemnity or writing
obligatory in the nature thereof;
"RESOLVED, ihat any such Attorney-in-Fact delivering a secretaria) certification that the foregoing resolutions still be in effect may insert in such
certification the date thereof, said date to be not later than the date of delivery thereof by such Attorney-in-Fact."
1. Llizabeth M. Tuck; Secretary of The Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing excerpts of Resolution
aduptcd by the Board of Directors of this corporation, and the Power of Attorney issued pursuant thereto, are true and correct; and that both the
Resolution anci the Power of Attorney are in full force and efFect.
IiV W IT\'ESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the facsimile seal of the corporation
this 14thday of November , 2000
~y / ~r ~i`'r C,lS~~'„~/l:.:s•`~'-~''~i
Elizabeth M. Tuck, Secretary
23237 (4199)
-