Loading...
24835 PE-1414A lY % 1 f f f ~ ,~f }S~ r~.{r, l ~ l . R.EQUEST FOR D.ESIGN DEViATiON $3-0.0o DA'I'E (?CTORLR. 9, 1.995 ROAI3 NAME INDT,ANA AVENUE , CRPlRZD # N.A. N.aME or I'LxI' RYV.ERWII:LK 2ND AUDI'rT.ON 1'1a1: # PF-1414A Ar?C31tESS OF i3LDC'x N.A- NA.MC OF BLDG PRO,IFCI' M.A. DLDG# B9 S 8 T 25 ~4.5 CEDERAL/STAT'C P.ROd.FCT# N.A. PROJECT LIMITS N.A. CXIS'l'ING CONI7i'17.10NS: PROPOSFI] IMPROVEMENTS; rtt~A'D WYD'1TI 401' 401t ROAD SURFACE ASPHALT YAVEMLN`.L' ASPH.ALT PAVEMEMT AVG. nAILY TRAYrIC N.A. N.A. Curreixt Traffic Count Desi~n Year Traffic Caunt pROJECT C}E5C12II''T.IO1`J RIVLRWALK ZliTI3 ADDYTI:ON IS A 14 LOT P.U.D. WITH INDYANA. AVENllE: A PUBL.l'C STREE'L YROVID'TNG ACCESS. IMY'ROVEMENTS INCLUDT: FUBLIG SEWER} WATER, STR.EET ANI1 DRAI.NAGE '[rACILI'lTEa. PR~'JPC)SED L'1FSI~'iN D'EVlA'I7ON DESIGIV AI+Ill CONSTRUCT A NUN-TY.PICAI., TIIIPORARY (JFFSTsT CU.L-DE-SAC. J E.F STI F ICA'HON; SPUKANE CalTN1'Y TIRL? flISTRI'CT #1 HlLS APPROVF.D xais RaAn CaNFIcuRATtnN oN SEPTE![Ii'ER 7, 1995. 7'HTS DESTGN DFVIATT4N 'IS REQIIIRRll BY SPOKANE CqiJM 1tEVEIW CC?M14ENT DAT.ED OCTOBER b, 1995. (VZA FAX) 'iPL E SE SLr ATTACHMLNT "A„ FOR YI[:T[JRE. ~ SC![3MIT1'ED BY INTAND PACICFIC ENGINEERINC DArFE, (lCTQBER 9, 1995 A~DRESS 707 WFST IT.11 SUI'rE 200 SPOKAVE, WASHINGTDN ~ , ZIP CODE, 99204 PCIONE # (509 ~ 458-6840 ADMMlSTRATlVE VARIANCE FEE 4F J34.00 rt'AIQ TC} SPOKANE Ct][TN"I'Y 1026 W I3I~C~,~DWA~Y, SPflI~A1~lI ;}]VA 99260-0170 PHOI+FE (509)456-3600 FAC (509)324-3478 -EZLQur_s•r wiT-L Nur riE lksviEwC-D w[1T10qr s- CAs~ICItEcx # RrcLZwEn aY r~ATE ~ ti~~~~Jey &93 DES1C~N DEVIATIO.N ~ • ~ STAFF RE, COM1VIENDATIQNS . . . ~ ' i ~ir i ~ ~ _ , I • f •I' ~i ;i7' !I , a' 1`~ fl~ ~ ( l l~ ' r Approved Approvecl w/canditions NaI IS►pproved. S 1 i . A ( y • ~jf , / } } . ~ i~rl.~~ . . ~ 1 .,:f ~ - ~ . . . • r'f f.': ` 1 y : . I'rojc;ct.IVlanager Date 1. ~ Approved Approved w/canditions Nac Approued t ) ~ ~ ~ Planning Traffic F.,ngineer T}nte ~ ~~~fri~ . • ~i .f~;.: , r,.,- i f.:'. ~f! d':d'?.1'. %:f.•ir~ ~''~~!''.~i•!r.'~' .f'.. ~i~ . • ,f+1r . .:i • ! ~f.,,+,f ~f Apprn,4d Approved w/conditions Nor. Approved ~ ~ ~f 1 ~;s~'i~ ;r` ` 1,,, ~V1 , r;~ . ? , ~ , - ~•1 'r~r'; ~ ` t ,s , Ir ~f Vrnject Maiiagexnetir E7xgineex I3ate y :r J Y. r . .~1~ ~1:. ~ . . . n~'. ..~`f ' . , . ~ r:';~ , . S - : ~ ,y ~ i~ . ~f ~.r~• i'?.'~~,~:, . + 1 . . ~ r ~ . r".. ~ ` ~ ,a - _ , ~ :,r ~ ~ar ~ , ,r• 1 ;o •.s+'~ . ,,.-•~''~,r , _ . . .~S~~.r 1•,+~•n': . 1 '.~"'`.;:~5~ ? ~ , :'~1~~. .f~, :`~.r''ti~ . `.N<y..r, r. •r2: d. ,r•. ~ .~~I . • 1 N ~ 1 ~ .'~~,1~'I , -:4'~~ ~ . , e..~~ ~ yt~- ~~C •.r ~ A i' ' ~ ~ r... 1.Y'.. . . .r . . . . . . i:- . ~ ~ l~ . . r . . ~ ~.r'. ~ ~ . ~,~4 , . . . . ,n d".'~.. , f. P~' P~ ~ ~ p . f,.',' • , r4~°rti~ed' A "r~iv6fd"w cc~d~iaiysKlot ~A~~ ~'rc~~ret~ ~ ' ~ } • ~ , , r' ~ -r~ , . \ f :I'( ~ \ J '~.r`'`~±~,J , . . i•`„•~. ~ .r~'• !.r , Operations EnginGC:r~ ~ Date SF4KANE COi7NTY ENG:[NEER.'S - DETERMIi+TATTUNt e) C.) •e C. ~c.gr- ? S ~ Approved wlna concfitions Approved as rmf7nmendecl Eibove Nat Approved ~ Spokaike Cou.nty F,r~fineer T]ate Bi'91 r ►'~7~ ~ . `OSED TEMPORARY 66, ~ I AROUND ~ I l-.- iC,M- ~ , - ~~+~~E~: rA j 4S' R `,',NAKE RI1~EFR' N T TEMPORARY TURN-AROUND ~AN N ~ EASEMENT \ ~ ~,OMMON A,--%~,- t1 . ~ g, ~ ~ CD W , 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ~ (TYPICAL) ~ ~ :•t.,;~'~ ~~;€,J~3 ~A~%~, ~ J INLAND ~ ,-,TEMPORARY TURNAROUND PACiFic ~ R IVERWALK 2 N D AD D ITI 0 N ENaINEERINQ 707 weSt 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6W ` 9/26/95 Spokana, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844;f ~ ^ _ . . . s • ' ~r^' \ • ~ ~ , . • • _ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . . , , . , . _ _ , - . . . . . • : : - - ' _ " . ' • . _ - - . , . ' ' ' • , - ' ' - ' _ . . . • - • - . ~ ~ - -'-'•:f'=.=:~ . . , • . ' • • . h;• • . . • , , • ~ _ : . . . . ' . ~ ~ RECErPT 225 9 ~ Received From ~ ~ INLAND PACIF Add . ,~r SS _Ud ~Q 7W 1R REF. NO. ~ YOUR 10 ` 9561' For $~a ~ ACCOUNT Of ~ HOW PAID ACCOUN7 ~ C,ASH ~ AMT. PAIO ~ 3QJD U CHECK BALANCE MONEIr ~ OUE ORDER _ By I 81(608 IWDiFORM ~ . ~ Jendor:SPO008 SPOk:ANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Check:10617 ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , - - - . . . . , _ . _ . o . . , . . . . , _ . . _ . ti., . . . . , . - . ~ INLANMPAClF1C ENGINEERING. Ca:;ANC.. ~ . : . . . . . ` . . ~ . . - ~ - . . . . ~ I G,6 I.7- " - . 70? W 7TH. AVE . SUITE 200- ' ~ ' . ~ ~ _ WpgH(NGTOM:TRUSTB'IINK ' - • . SPOKANE. WA 99204• . . ' • - . ~ . . - sPauwE wA M10.2127. ' (509) 458,6g40' z"n251> . , . . : , , _ - . . - . - . , - . • ~ _ . . • _ , ~ . . ~ , . . _ . . _ . . , . - - : • ~ ' OATE- CONTROL NO ~ AMOUM- _1°o/09/95~ 10617- 30 ~,44 ~ . ~ ~ * ~-~~TH i R~TY' ~ . " _ ; " . . . , ' ~ • : ~ , , : ~ ~ - . - ~~At~IIt.. ttip:%~r`t7c~T~ f,EY~L L AR•S~ , PAY' - - - • • • . ~ . • ~ - - ~ ~ ' ~ . - t, ~ : TO •THE,' . . _ . , ^ , . _ ' . . . . , . ~ , . ; - ~ . - _ _ , ~ _ , - . . . • - . • • - t OROEEi' OF S POKANE: - C.UUNTY-' ENG-INEERS - ~ ' ' ' • . • ' • - . INLAND' PAEIFIC ENG{NEEEiINGCO-, INC . , . . ~ . , , • . _ - ~ ' . . . : ~ • _ • . . (3ENERA` ACCOUNT• : . , } ~ . ' . _ , , . _ , _ . ~ ~ . ` . . ~ . • - - - • - . - • t~ . . . . ~,0, ~ ~ ~ • auT►tOiUZED.sIGNATUAS: . . . 11~i-0 6.~~,~~~ ? L~ 2 5, L~0.Qff8:qs-:-, i-0 Q9: 7, 6 4- i~t.,3nP-. . . , . R . u - OFF1~E OfTFIE COUN'I1' FNGINFFR • A D1VISION OFTF IE PU13LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. I°Iormann, .['.E., Counly F-nginecr fJennis M. Scott, P.E., Director AGREEMENT' TO PAY F:CES - - LNGINEER'S, AGItEENIEI'~IT NiJ~VIBER. ip U' This agreement between Spokane County and , name o per an) wltose iaiterest in the project is, . ' (i.e. dwner, agenr, etc.) i$ entered into l'his 3t day Qf =~tto-r' , 19 Tllis agrcement is applicable to the project kiYawii as: ~~1'_ ~.l~~~ . p_rpject aTYress or t~ename'&-'file num cr - - That the iticiivicfuals and parties nained het-ein as having an interest i» the above described properly ar project agree to the follQwing: l. Reimburse Spokane Cou»ty for project review and inspection fees as specified in Chapter 9.14 of the Spokane Cburity Code. The fees will be based on actual salary costs incurred by Spokane County fQr projec( reviews and / or inspeclions rlus a ten percent aclmtnistrative charge, aiid will be billed nionthly as accrued. Any billing amounts due, including any expenses incurrecl in tlie collectiQn of an overdtie account, must be. ,paid prior to tlie GpunCy's accept.ance of tl-ie project for 'filing. ,[f a, projeit is approved aiidlor filed vviit'i abalance s[ill owing, the unpaicl balaiice shall he paict withiiz 30 days of the imvoice date. ' . ' 2., The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specifieci above. 3. Any'iiivoices not paid witllin 30 days af the invoice caate will''be cacisittered deliciquent. ~f-any-outst'anding balai7ce dn the acc«ujit, Fur thi's projec;t is not paid within 30 days of ' il_ie.invoice clafie, »o further reviews of the project cfocumc:nCs will 1~e onclucted un[il lhe entire account balaiice is paicl. Any balance on thGaccount for this projec[ not paid withi,nf 5days of the invbice da1e may.result in Iegal, act,iUn Qr the iniCiati4ii 4f otlier . cQ11ecCioil, pr«cedures, irleluding refetral te a collectiunagettcy. The Sponsor 'will be liable For any and all expenses incurred Uy ttie Coiinly for the collection aF overdue accounts. 4. The, inontlily billi»g shotild be sent to the attent,ion of'': NAME: r A DD!Z ESS : Li~r7". 1J CITY, STATE: ZIP CODE: . ~ PI-IQNE C.PCO jf> ~~ryG ; ~`(o - . . .Ma I understand' that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in compietion or approval of the Project or ocher possibJe saiiciions, ~ 0 If this fee agreenient is completed by someone dther lhan the Sponsor (i.e., the project owner or a pr,incipal in the firm sponsoring the project), such as llle Engineer designing . the project; tll,en written authorization from ttie Sponsor specifically authorizing the 11,gerit to execute.tbis Fee Agree,iicnt is - edto i-his Fee Agreement. . SIGNATU'RE 13y: - - - = - ' - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ EIVE c.. ~ ' - (PRINT NAME) . AUG 0 8 ItETtJ-RN ~FLL~~?Vk~yC?~Y TO SPOK4AN'E COiTNTY ENGINEERS ' k1p1f1agrecmen.fee 2/1%9-5"'-`_.- 4 • 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane,, WA 99260:0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 'l'l?D: (509) 324-3166 .7L!_-31-1995 14 s 4,'/ ~ I M_AND PAC I F I C ENG P. a3 $ K.~a N ~ C n Cl N'T' Y OFRCe OF 'nrE CouNTr ETAouMn • w DMSION 01; T*tF Puauc WoWJs DEPwxrMevr RanaLd C. Hormnr, i'.E. tovnty Engineer O"aus M. Scotl, r.E.. Dirertar AGREEMEN'T TU PA'Y FEES LtNGiINM'S AGREFMENT NEIMBgR This agreemcat bctwcart 8pokane County and . . o per whose inttrtst in tiie project u , . weer. ' cLs.1 Racal, ia entered lnto this 31 day of -MerT , t 9.17 j!5_~ . Tht6 agteemerx ts applicibie to the projecc knswn as: - tp6n2ml~•1!Eqwtzs~ '~?la•~.1. 1~~,ASE ~ . or o 'I'hac the indivtduais and partics named lnrcin as tiavrng an inierest in the above deacribod propecty cr pcojeu agree co tlu following: t. Rcimburse Spo{canc County for projeu rcvicw snd inspwion fees ss spxified in Chapur 9.14 of the S,pokane Couaty Codc. Tte fees arill be based on adnal salary costs iacntrcd by Spoksttt Cowtty for projcu reviews wd I or lttapecxtans psus a trn peltent administrative chargr, and will be btlted cnonthly as acctutd. Atry billing ainounts dut, including any eipensm inwrrtd in tlu cxollection of ait ovcrciue account, musc be paid preor co the County's ac.cTtQnce of the projctt for fiting. if a projocc is apgro•+ed andlor fclod widi a balance sa(I owiits. the uVaid balance sEWll be paid wuhin 30 days of (he invoice ciste. 2. The undersjgncd agrees that tlusc fees ete due and payable upan receipr of the billing as spexiFied abovc, 3. Any invoiees not patd wltbin 30 days of the invoice date will be cousiderod delinquesu. lf any attcstending batance on tfu acoatuu for lhes prejexc Is noe paid withln 30 days of tltr imoiu daic, no tlicliitc cev"KVVS of thz projea docurmits wl)1 bt eons3ucced uacil the entire accxiunt balanca is paid. Any bslaltcr QA the acwunt fbr tttia ptvjeu noi pald within 65 days of die invuice clate may resutt iu tegat acxinn oc the initi:tiaa of ather aoltection procadurts, intttading rrfaral to a colfatidn agency. The Spoasor will be tiablc for :ny and all expensea fRasned by the Counry for the eolleetion of overdue aacounts. 4. The moatttly billiag shauld bt 5ew to the aueatiton of: NAME: arvo- ADDRESS: W~ C[TY, SZ'ATE: RAVA&kap 1Lk Z1P CODB: PH4NE A~: C~l 10U6 I understand that fai]ure to pay these fees may resUlt in dciay in completiaa or approval of the project or athu possiblc sanctions. O if this foe agrocituait is compided by sameone othtr chan the Sponsor (i.e., the pr+oject owaer or a principal in ihe tian spoasoring the pmjoa). aucli as the Fugine" desigaing the projm. ~hen wricecn authorization from the Sp4nsor epedtcally enthasisiae the Agent to execute Wis Fee Agrament is acftched co this r-ft Agt+eatmc. SIGNATURE By: ' • c ~ ME) RETLIRN MLOW C"Y i'4 SF4KAhTS COUl1LIY LNGINEM tiVkflsVccrwrj.feo 211193 ~13 324-3~aTS 't'UO: (509},Z4~166 1QZ6 W. dtoadivav Ave. - S~1ie~e. wA 9926G'm70 '(509) ~'~x ( t ~ r~ < 1•' BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING IN THE MATTER OF GRANTING AN EXTENSION- ) OF-TIME REQUESTED FOR PE-1414-81 / PUDE-1-82 ZE-92-81, "RIVERWALK" (PREVIOUSLY "RIVERWAY VILLA") ~ AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT, PRELIMINARY ) FINDINGS OF FACT, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE CHANGE ) CONCLUSIONS AND AND ) DECISION GRANTING APPROVAL OF REVISED PRELIMINARY ) PLAT AND PRELIMINARY PUD SITE DEVELOPMENT ) PLAN FOR "RIVERWALK". ) THIS MATTER, a request for ar~ & Le o' 'from Michael A. Hunt pursuant to a letter dated August 16, 1994, has been receive an ecide upon (after an extensive review, redesign and coordination with the applicant's engineers and the various agencies), pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G), Spokane County Zoning Code and RCW 58.17.140. AND THIS MATTER, a request for approval of a"Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RNERWALK" (previously Riverway Villa) as submitted by Inland Pacific Engineering on May 19, 1995. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by Spokane County Planning. 2. The proposal for the time extension is located south of both the Spokane River and the Washington State Parks Department's Centennial Trail property, east of and adjacent to Barker Road, and north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue in Section S, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) plans were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on Apri12, 1982. The development then consisted of a manufactured home subdivision on 118 acres for 3651ots including open space and one commercial lot. The preliminary plat approval also included a rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with a(PUD) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the now expired, Spokane Counry Zoning Ordinance. Such zone reclassifications are accomplished as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor. No portion of the project has been recorded to date. 4. The Freliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change original approvals were, in part, based on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the proposed project. However, numerous changes have occurred since 1982, which require mitigating measures as new conditions of approval. 5. The Findings of the August 5, 1993, Time Extension decision are included by reference with this action to assure clarification of the below findings, decision and conditions. 6. At the time of the preliminary approvals, Apri12, 1982, the Comprehensive Plan designated this area as URBAIV Category. The location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. The Cornprehensive Plan was adopted late 1980 with an effective date of January l, 1981. The URBAN designation has remained the same since the 1982 preliminary approvals. The approved original plans and zone changes continue to conform to the adopted Comprehensive Plan, including the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Plans. 7. On February 24, 1983, the sponsor submitted a Final PUD Site Development Plan for the southern portion (SI/2) of the project and requested a change of condition to postpone the Final PUD hearing of the northern portion (N1/2) for three (3) years. The request was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) on April 14, 1983. The approved Final PUD Site Development Plan for the S 1/2 of the site consisted of a maximum of 178 - lots on approximately 50 acres, which excluded the proposed commercial property at the southwest corner. The approved Final S 1/2 PUD Site Development Plan was different from the Preliminary PUD Development Plan stamped "Received November 12, 1981. Larger residential lots, consolidated open space, elimination of recreational improvements and redesign of the roads were approved in 1983. The HEC approved a redesign of the PUD that clearly deviated from the original conceptual "preliminary PUD" map stamped "Received November 12, 1981." The remaining N 1/2 of the Preliminary PUD was conditioned to acquire Final PUD Site Development Plan approval no later than May 1, 1986. After the Planning Department sent a late Expiration Notice to the sponsor, a Time ~ • ~ • 1 ~ June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 2 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 7. continued Extension Application was accepted July 1986, processed, public notice given and the project was granted approval approximately October 1986. Therefore, this deadline was administratively (see Find.ing No. 8., 10. and 11. below) extended which followed with four additional administrative time extensions (see Finding No. 12. below). As a condition of the last Time Extension approved on August 5, 1993, a one (1) year deadline was imposed on this north Final PUD Site Development Plan approval with an expiration date of September 1, 1994. On March 24, 1994, before the above expiration date for the north Final PUD, the sponsor submitted an overall (N1/2 and S1/2) Fina1 PUD Site Development Plan for administrative review and approval along with this time extension application. Since that submittal the sponsor has proposed and received administrative approval to submit a revised overall "preliminary PUD," which improves the lot design, open space and road design. May 19, 1995, (over one year later) the revised "preliminary PUD" was submitted and will be made part of this time extension decision to create a clear record of the "revised preliminary plat" and the "revised preliminary PUD." 8. On October 22, 1985, with Resolution Number 85-0900 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the new Spokane County Zoning Code to be effective January 1, 1986. The new Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, established an administrative process to approve Final PUD site plans. The previous Zoning Ordinance had required public hearings before the Hearing Examiner Committee to approve Final PUD site plans. 9. The project area was zoned Agricultural (A) at the time of the Apri12, 1982, preliminary approvals. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is presently zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR.-3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE-286-57) and redesignated to UR-3.5 on January 1, 1991, consistent with the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING CODE. Note, as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor the existing UR- 3.5 zoning will be reclassified to comply with the original zone change approval on Apri12, 1982, pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. The project area with the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone will be substituted with the present Urban Residential-7 (LJR-7) and the present PUD overlay zone. The old approved Commercial (C) Zone will be substituted with the present Community Business (B-2). Any development of the proposed plat and planned unit development will need to conform with the current Zoning, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision standards. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the revised proposal as conditioned will conform to the requirements of the approved zone change to UR-7 Zone with PUD Overlay Zone and the B-2 Zone. 10. March 18, 1986, Spokane Counry adopted specific criteria for administratively considering the Extension of Time regarding the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. Extension of time decisions no longer require a public hearing before the HEC. The time extension criteria is found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Board of County Commissioner Resolution Number 86-0246). 11. October 1986, the Planning Department granted its first administrative (without public hearing) time extension for 2 years under the authority of Chapter III, Section G of the amended Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. This 1986 Extension of Time approval amended aad extended the previous conditions of approval regarding all specific deadlines of the April 14, 1986, Hearing Examiner Committee decision. This deadline extension included the NI/2 Final PUD deadline of May 1, 1986 (see Finding No. 7. above). 12. Th.is Time Extension application is the seventh (7th) request for a time extension. The total life of the Preliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change has been 13 years and 2 months: • April 1982 to April 1983 ...................Prelim.inary approvals - HEC • April 1983 to April 1986 . . . . . . . . . . . 3 years granted with change of conditions - HEC • Nov 1986 to Dec 1988 ......................2 years (see Finding No. 11. above) - Ping. Dept. • Dec 1988 to Jan 1990 2 years - Ping. Dept. • Jan 1990 to Jan 1992 ........................2 years - Ping. Dept. • Jan 1992 to Jan 1993 1 year - Ping. Dept. March 4, 1993 Time Extension Denied for lack of progress March 12, 1993 Appeal of Denial and additional information provided May 24, 1993 Time Extension administratively Approved with updated conditions June 3, 1993 Appeal of new and updated conditions-of-approval Aug 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee public hearing scheduled and advertised July 1993 additional information provided July 27, 1993 appeal withdrawn by Jim Reuter July 29, 1993 withdrawal confirmed by project legal council, F. J. Dullanry, Jr. Aug 5, 1993 administratively amended the May 24, 1993 Time Extension conditions • August 1993 to September 1994....... 1 year - Ping. Dept. August 23, 1993 HEC withdrawal of appeal ORDER (see Finding No. 13. below) ~ ' 0 June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 3 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 12. continued The above stated chronology does not include the processing time for which approval had lapsed during review or appeal of decisions for each time extension request. Complete and timely requests for any future time extensions shall be consistent with RCW 58.17.140 and Spokane County Planning Subdivision Ordinance. Timely requests for consideration of time extensions are the applicant/developer's responsibiliry as notices of expiration of approval by Spokane County Planning are not regularly provided. When said notices are provided they are done so only on a courtesy basis. 13. The appeal of the conditions of approval added to the administrative May 24, 1993, Time Extension approval was advertised and scheduled for the August 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) public hearing. Due to subsequent amendments made to these conditions in the administrative August 5, 1993, Time Extension approval, the appellant, Jim Reuter, withdrew his appeal by letter dated July 27, 1993, as did the project attorneys by letter dated July 29, 1993. This appeal agenda item was not presented at the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing. Later, on August 23, 1993, the Hearing Examiner Committee signed FIlVDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER which states: ORDER "The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, accepts the withdrawal by Jim Reuter, of the application of the Preliminary Plat of PE-1414-81 described in the application known a Riverway Villa. " MOTION "UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRELIMIIVARY PLAT OF RIVERWAY VILLA AND RENDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND APPEAL OF THE EXTENSION OF TIME NULL AND VOID. " This order and motion was based on Finding No. 2, which incorrectlv states: "2. On July 29, 1993, Spokane County Planning received a written request from the appellant, Jim Reuter, to withdraw the preliminary plat of Riverway Villa. The Hearing Examiner Committee, by accepting the withdrawal, renders the preliminary plat and appeal of the extension of time null and void. " The evidence within file PE-1414-81, including the withdrawal letters, indicates the Preliminary Plat and PUD sponsors clearly intended to keep the project alive and, in fact, only requested to WTTHDRAW THE APPEAL from the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing agenda, since the issues with the cond.itions of approval had been administratively resolved with the Counry Prosecutor's Office and Spokane County Planning administration. While the August 23, 1993, Hearing Examiner Committee FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER could have been written more clearly, all references to withdrawal applies onlv to the appeal and not the overall preliminary approvals. 14. This development and its approvals have exceeded its four (4) year grace period (the first 3 yeaz expiration period and 1 additional year) where additional conditions cannot be applied to the original approval, as provided in RCW 58.17.140, ExTENSIONS. All time extensions thereafter may have additional conditions of approval added or updated as each subsequent time extension is granted. The upgrading of conditions allows Spokane County to bring development approvals into compliance with present adopted policy and regulations while addressing current conditions and resolving current problems or impacts. 15. The application for this time extension has been evaluated using the below adopted criteria. These criteria are found in Chapter ffi, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this time extension decision. Section G states; Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for. " and follows with "Upon application for time extension, the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of the following circumstances is found to apply: - 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been f inalized since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval RESPONSE: No portion of the site has been finalized or recorded as a final plat. However, Phase 1(401ots in the southwest corner with a public sewer system and excluding the commercial site) is presently being reviewed for Final Plat approval to be recorded with the County Auditor. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density and other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: / ~ June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 4 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 15. continued 2. continued a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary plat approval. RESPONSE: Correspondence from North Idaho Engineering dated August 16, 1994, indicates that progress has been made towards finalizing the project. The progress is summarized as: a. Survey calculations of the entire first 37 (now 40) lot Final Plat Map have been performed. b. Public utilities to the site have been arranged. c. Construction financing has been secured and is in place pending release of construction permits by the Spokane County Engineering Department. d. Sanitary Sewer Improvement Plans including lift station design have been submitted to the Spokane County Utilities Department. f. The Final PUD Plan for the southerly 1/2 of Riverway Villa has been approved and the northerly 1/2 has been submitted for administrative review and approval as provided for in Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning Code. g. The mitigation agreement with the Central Valley School District has been executed. h. Landscaping plans for Indiana Avenue have been submitted. i. The draft declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions, articles of incorporation and bylaws have been submitted. j. Soils testing has been completed the results of which have been incorporated into the redesign of street and storm drain plans. Since the above August 16, 1994, letter, North Idaho Engineering and Inland Pacific Engineering indicates that additional progress has been made: 1. The water plan for the first phase has been approved. The water system with fire hydrants have been installed for the first phase. Consolidated Irrigation Water District has accepted the water system and the contractor is has completed the pressure tests and was in the process of flushing the system to pass health tests. 2. A dryline sewer system has been installed for the first phase. 3. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for boring under the freeway. WSDOT has approved a boring permit. 4. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for Barker & Freeway interchange right turn lane improvements. WSDOT has approved the I-90 eastbound right turn lane pernut. 5. Electric, cable and gas utilities have been installed for the first phase. 6. Street grading for the first phase is completed and "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 7. Curb forms have been partially installed along Indiana for the first phase. It was "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 8. A model home building permit was issued and was being constructed. 9. Redesign of the "preliminary plat" and "preliminary PUD" plans are complete. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would normally fund. ItESPONSE: This condition does not apply to the first 381ots however the developer has as indicated in the August 16, 1994, North Idaho Engineering letter that preparation of plans and documents to facilitate future phases have been expedited, including public sewer for the entire project. 16. Spokane County Planning does find that the applicant has taken significant steps to finalize all phases of the preliminary plat of record prior to the September 1, 1994, expiration of the preceding time extension (6th extension). During this present time extension review period additional progress has also been made as indicated in FIlVDING 15. above. The present owners have purchased the entire preliminary plat. The sewer system has been designed, sized and partially installed to serve the entire preliminary plat, considerable engineering has been accomplished and is currently underway for a major portion of the preliminary plat and a redesign of the preliminary plat/PUD has been completed. Therefore the applicant/owner has demonstrated sufficient progress to comply with the requirements of Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance for extending the expiration date of the preliminary approvals for three years. i / . • ~ ~ / June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 5 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 17. Additional conditions for this time extension have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including Spokane County Planning, the County Division of Engineering and Roads, the County Division of Utilities, the County Health District the County Division of Build.ings, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Central Valley School District, the County Parks Department and Fire District No. l. Said conditions shall be included in the appropriate sections of this decision and shall not preclude previous conditions of approval for time extensions unless specifically stated. If conditions conflict, the most current condition shall apply. 18. The Spokane County Parks Department has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 15, 1995. The Parks Department has requested a voluntary agreement be completed between the Parks Department and the property owner to mitigate impacts to the County Park system. A previous February 1, 1995, letter from Parks Director, Sam Angove, also indicates their desire to purchase 7.4 acres of the PUD open space adjacent the Centennial Trail at the north end of the project. Counry legal counsel has ind.icated such agreements may be required. Spokane County Planning recommends the property owner negotiate with the Spokane County Parks Department to provide for appropriate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording this Final Plat in the form of dedication of park land or a written agreement between the owner and the Spokane County Parks Department. Note, property from this project along the Spokane River was dedicated to Washington State Parks for the Centennial Trail. 19. The Central Valley School District No. 356 has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 21, 1995. The District has indicated that ex.isting school facilities are inadequate to serve the proposed Plat and PUD and wishes to negotiate with the owner to provide adequate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Review by County legal counsel indicates the condition requested by the School District can be required for developments. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording the Final Plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the school district. Note, the school district indicates there is an e3cisting signed agreement. However, the request to add the standard condition will assure that the existing and signed agreement will continue to be required and maintained throughout the finalization of this project. 20. The following facts and conclusions are also relevant. a. The applicantlowner should continue to show substantial progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time for the remaining phases of the approved Preliminary Plat / PUD which have not been filed. b. By reference FIlVDIlVGS of all previous approvals are specifically incorporated herein unless otherwise stated. An attempt to include all previous and applicable Spokane County Planning CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL within this time extension has been made by Spokane Counry Planning. Due to the complex nature of this file omissions may have occurred. If further clarification is necessary regarding previous conditions, the file record and documents continue to be the authority and shall be used to resolve such questions/determ.inations. c. A part of the northern portion of the approved preliminary plat of record fell under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173-19-400. Creation of the Washington State Centennial Trail along the Spokane River has removed portions of the original site from Shoreline jurisdiction. Review of the Revised PUD site plan for the northern portion of the preliminary plat shows the portions of the site that is still within the Shorelines area, designated "Conservancy." About 15 of the proposed lots are partly within this 200 foot shoreline boundary; however, each of these lots has a building site that is outside the 200 foot boundary. d. The site is located within an area of Spokane County which was removed from the sewer exemption area on July 1, 1994 by the Washington State Health Board pursuant to WAC 246-272-100. The site is also located within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). Any future time extension requests may be affected by the new exemption boundary; however, the project is to be served by public sewer. 21. The site is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA). Route # 18, Broadway Feeder, provides connecting service to the Valley Park and Ride lot located on Universiry Avenue and 4th Avenue. ti ) ~ . ~ ~ June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 6 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 22. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRIIVCIPLE Ax'rERIAL and Mission Avenue as a MINOR ARTERIAL. The existing roadway widths are inconsistent with that specified in the adopted Arterial Road Plan. In order to implement the Plan the County Engineer has requested a 5 foot reserve strip along Barker Road and a 10 foot reserve strip along Mission Avenue to be designated as a Future Acquisition Area. Preliminary plat approval also required dedication of an additional 15 feet of right-of-way on Barker Avenue and dedication of 10 feet on Mission Road. Sidewalks are required along these arterial roads fronting and within the plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has recommended conditions to mitigate impacts to the Barker Road and Interstate-90 interchange. Those recommendations have been incorporated into this decision. The Spokane County Engineering Department has met with the developers representative and reached an agreement/understanding with regards to phasing and development related improvements to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. That understanding and conditions thereof have been incorporated into the Engineer's conditions as set forth in this document. 23. The proposed plat will be served by a public water system. Waste water disposal will be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, wh.ich involves an approved public sewer system with pressurized lines to the sewer trunkline south of Interstate 90. 24. Recognizing the conditions of approval and Spokane County development standards, appropriate provisions have been made to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by plating the proposed subdivision as conditioned. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subd.ivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane Counry. Spokane County Planning has considered the provision of public facilities cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. open spaces b . drainage ways c. public andlor private rights-of-way d. transit e. potable water f. sanitary waste disposal g. parks and recreation facilities h . playgrounds i. schools and school grounds j . sidewalks 25. The delay in issuing this time extension is the result of (1) change of project sponsors, (2) change of project engineers, (3) resignation of Counry planner assigned to this project (4) an extensive review of the large thirteen year old file, (5) the physical reorganization of the file (6) two reorganizations of planners within Spokane County Planning and (7) sponsor proposed redesign of the preliminary p1atIPUD. The review revealed considerable confusion regarding the file organization and content of the file and a need to clarify the record, as indicated in the above findings. 26. The applicant has requested to call the development by the name "RNERWALK" and will record all subdivisions by variations of this new name. This was administratively approved. 27. May 19, 1995, the applicant submitted a"Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site develo pment"'-lT~n~(~PUai, feVthe entire pro ject. This su bmitt a l h a v e b e e n proposed by the applicant to improve the design of the site plan (ie, eliminate double fronting lots, consolidate open areas, other) and has been circulated for agency review and comments. The proposed Final Plat Phase 1 area of the 1983 (S 1/2) Final PUD site plan has not changed. NOTE: To clarify the original application (see 1982 Zone Change Map 1:400 Assessor Map stamped by L.S. Patrick Moore) and the present applicant's intent, Inland Pacific Engineering submitted a May 25, 1995, letter with documents requesting to: (1) eliminate the commercial lot from the "preliminary PUD" and (2) remove that portion of the original 1981 property from the "Preliminary Plat of Record" and the "Preliminary PUD" that was transferred to Washington State Parks Department for the Centennial Trail, Auditor No.9112090116 dated Dec. 9, 1991. } June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 7 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 28. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RNERWALK" was found to be in substantial conformance to the original approvals described in 3. and 7. above and this revised plan has been admirustratively approved. Because all but the Phase 1 of the Preliminary Plat, the Final S1/2 PUD and the Ni/2 Preliminary PUD has been revised, a"Final PUD Site Development Plan" will need to be submitted and must be approved for compliance with the 'a ~i'sed P,~rsel~~i~ r, fflinIar,=N1jft&,M, th s-:a of ~he propos~ ~ atlPla~t pri'or to Q~ac ~ i~ ~►a be.; ge o~de ANThis will allow for flexibility in determining the sPecific and etai e ed sign of each Final PUD of each final plat at that time, for that market and pursuant the then existing development standards. Each Final PUD site development plan will need to substantially conform with the "preliminary PUD" and specifically conform with the PUD Overlay Zone standards in affect at the time. 29. The May 19, 1995, "Revise Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RNERWALK" shows the applicants present development phases; however, these phase boundaries may need to be modified as the economy, market and other variables change. DECISION BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, a three year extension of time request for PE-1414-81 / PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81, "RNERWALK" (previously "R.iverway Villa) an approved Prelimin Plat Preliminary Planned Unit Development and zone reclassification is hereby A1l _ R° ~ • ' ` ' e~ e '"eS ' e 1~'m'lM Preliminary Site development Plan (PUD) of RTVERW-AL-K is also ereby PKOVED as the official preliminary plat of record and as the preliminary planned unit development plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All pervious conditions of approval shall continue to apply, as applicable, except as specifically amended. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee and all time extension conditions, as amended or updated, shall be binding on the "Applicant." The term "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. This time extension is approved for three (3) ~r Rlyy u ti~Jull8. The applicant may request another extension of time approximrty-five (45) days Pnor to the above expiration date. 3. Additional Extensions of Time shall not be granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance is demonstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary subdivision and the preliminary planned unit development approval will become null and void. 4. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3. and #4.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RNERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," has been administratively approved and shall be the official preliminary plat of record and shall be the preliminary planned unit development. This May 19, 1995 revised plan includes 9.11 acres for a proposed commercial lot and 107.3 acres for a proposed planned unit development (PUD), being a total of 116.41 acres (see said plan map). The PUD proposes 365 single family lots. At the time of each Final PUD site development plan and Final Plat is submitted for each phase they shall comply with all development standards for the approved zone classifications, including the Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone, all as amended. (see 9. below) Note, at this point in time, no part of the preliminary p1atIPUD have been finalized since the original 1982 approval. 5. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #34.) The above May 19, 1995 revised plan sbows development phases. These phases may be administratively amended if the various agencies find that each proposed phase will provide proper traffic circulation, provide adequate emergency vehicle access, meet necessary utilities design andlor utiliry circulation requirements, and provide for the public health and safety. • - . . June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 8 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 6. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RNERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," now replaces: (1) the "Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated November 12, 1981, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 2, 1982, which consisted of 365 manufactured home lots and 1 commercial parcel and (2) the "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated March 15, 1983, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, which was a redesign of the 50.2 acre South portion (S 1/2) with 1781ots, excluding the commercial parcel. This S 1/2 also being the Final PUD Site Development Plan approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, is now NULL and vOID and is replaced with the above May 19, 1995, preliminary p1atlPUD. Note, since the final plat for Phase 1 was submitted before the decision to approve the May 19, 1995, Revised Plan, Phase 1 mav be finalized under the provisions of the April 14, 1983, Final PUD, S 1/2. 7. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) OA "-Final PUD Site Developmerit Plan' must be submitted and approved for at least the area of each proposed final plat prior to recording any Final Plat, other than Phase 1. This includes the S i/2 of RivERwALK (previousl.y Riverway Villa). Each "Final PUD" must substantially conform to the above May 19, 1995, revised preliminary p1atIPUD and comply with the applicable development standards existing at the time of submittal. 8. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #4. and 6.) The approved zone change, ZE-92-81, shall be amended pursuant the PROGxAM To IMPLEMENT. The project area approved for the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone with the old PUD Overlay Zone shall be substituted with the present Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone and the present PUD Overlay Zone. The project area approved for old Commercial (C) Zone shall be substituted with the present Community Business (B-2) Zone. The existing UR-3.5 Zone shall be reclassified as each phase of the development is recorded as a Final Plat with the County Auditor. The reclassifications shall be consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record, as amended by the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. 9. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #7 and #11.) The final plat(s) shall be designed substantially in conformance with the above "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record date stamped May 19, 1995." No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. Each Final Plat shall comply with the current development standards of the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, as each may be amended. The proposed commercial parcel shall comply with the current development standards of the Community Business (B-2) Zone, as amended. The entire site shall also comply with the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. 10. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat and final Planned Unit Development Plan to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 11. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to recording a final plat which includes the commercial parcel, Spokane Counry shall: a. insure that the commercial site is in compliance with the development standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended, b. insure that the commercial site is in compliance with the development standards of the Spokane County Road Standards, as amended, and d. insure that commercial uses do not exceed those of "neighborhood" and "local serving" type retail or service(s). 12. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial parcel, a specif'ic site development plan (all or part) shall be submitted to Spokane County. The specific site development plan will be circulated for comments from appropriate agencies to deternune compliance with current regulations and for substantial compliance with the approved May 19, 1995, revised Plan and the conditions of approval. 13. A final plat name/number shall be proposed before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. 14. Prior to filing of the final plat, the appropriate street address(es) shall be indicated. 15. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 9 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 16. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all p~- ate, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: ,e yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are quested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this fnal plat. The setbacks icated on this plat may be varied from. if proper zoning approvals are obtained. 17. e final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or e ceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 18. 'tthte ppropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. ritten approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with submittal of the final plat. 19. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to Spokane County Planning prior to filing the final plat. 20. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 21. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the Counry Auditor aTITLE NOTICE specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice may be released, in full or in part, only by Spokane County Planning. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as the recording of the Final Plat and shall provide the following, if applicable: a. f At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road shall be designated as reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Mission Avenue and Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet of dedication along Barker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner sha11 be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 22. Spokane Counry Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a TI'TLE NO'I'ICE noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This TITLE NOTICE shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as the recording of the Final Plat and shall only be released, in full or in part, by Spokane County Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as j. ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ J, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ J is available for inspection and copying in Spokane County Planning. 23. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a temporary cul de sac/stub road: Lot(s) , Block(s) are located on a temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. 7'his temporary cul-de-sac/stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate. 24. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Departrnent and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. ~ June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 10 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 25. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building pennit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 26. final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fzre protection district, County Building & Safety Deparrinent and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall provide fo,rop individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. 27. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the, f inal plat, " including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system. 28. The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fue protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 29. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 30. Approval is required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building pernuts. 31. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 32. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of build.ing permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 33. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #29.) The Final PUD site development plan shall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and individuallot lines. 34. A copy of the homeowners/property owners' association articles of incorporation andlor bylaws andlor covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to Spokane County Planning prior to finalizing. 35. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recorded copy of the agreement making provisions for public schools and parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measure(s). The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that appropriate provisions for school facilities and public parks must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the applicantlsponsor, school district, and County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 36. The owner/applicant shall coordinate with the local Fire District and the Fire Marshall to insure that adequate access is provided for emergency services, prior to submitting each Final Plat phase. 37. Each final plat dedication shall make reference to the Home Owners Association agreements as a notice to potential lot purchaser of the responsibilities of lot ownership within the subdivision. • • f June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 11 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 38. The lots or common open space shown on the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Plat that are within the 200 foot Shoreline boundary are required to comply with the Spokane County Shoreline Program regulation. The Final Plat shall show the 200 foot shoreline boundary. Each lot which includes the 200 foot boundary must have a buildable site that meets all required setbacks (both zoning and shorelines) before it is recorded as a Final Plat. Notes (at least 2) shall be placed on the Final Plan drawing near the affected lots and common open space which state: The property with the 200 foot Shoreline boundary has legal limitations on the use of this land pursuant vegetation and building of structures, including fences. 39. If a Final Plat is recorded with any lot partially within the 200 foot boundary of the Shoreline, a TITLE NOTICE shall be recorded by Spokane Counry Planning immediately after recording the Final Plat with the County Auditor. The TrTLE NOTICE shall include a statement similar to: Any lot's property or common open space property within the 200 - foot shoreline boundary have limitations on building structures (including fences) and changing the natural vegetation pursuant the SPOKANE CO U1VTY SHORELINE PROGRAM regulations. 40. After the commercial parcel is granted B-2 Zoning with the recording of a Final Plat, the applicant/owner should make application for a Binding Side Plan to allow for timely , division and sale of portions of the commercial site after a Final Binding Site Plan is recorded. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A BuildinLy Permit Or Use Of The Propertv As ProDosed: 1. 1 m:xunow;.~po~~dsCOt~d~~~tonS~~r~~1►il~l~.~~lri~. 2. The Counry Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRIIVCIPLE Arterial and Mission Avenue as a MINOR Arterial. The existing right-of-way widths are not consistent with those "specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right-of-way dedication, a~~"~'•`'p o~ p.r~o ~ ~ , , e 1Oe-e-win►w~_~ t~h~o;n~g~M~i~~+ion Ammmohma,11111 et idERWR . ThiS,i.vu;=rFark a c ' ed by -ou~n 3 ta~t~t~h~t~usn ~n arter-i ' mpro ~~n , ~ ~e ~ ~ ad er 073. . a M , ' • • IT nue. 3. As per the original conditions of approval: ~ ~ ,a1~r.~i§afAe-.ach =1 M11 b ,c~ ~ u~i~r rper and reviewed by Q~k ~pokan ounty pnor to plat finalization. This analysis wil be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and imlion Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. ~ 5. Intersection and road improvements shall be constructed and phased as follows predicated on an agreement reached on or about Au ust 4, 1994, between North g Idaho Engineenng and the Spokane County Engineer. Barker Road: 4pnaA- ~r~ ~~s~1`~7'~~►. Phase I: (Barker Road to be a 5-lane section per the County's Special section for Barker Roa . Provide acceleration/deceleration lanes (sized per WSDOT Design manual), as well as inbound and outbound tapers. ~..~~~se II: 1G~onst~ - ~ ~t~B~a~kex~~oad.nor.th,ta~th-*r'" Rive'~''r, an"'d~sout, ±.vt,g 1!, ~ Sion ;A~en,ue-au.n1&wib.u~i1t au~t~s.o.on~~rwas,~~a~~,~ r I. Phase VI: Construc-t_Barikar north-t ne ivm ,aR&~o-at+l1i*a~XMon Mission Avenue: . Phase I: Construct Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. i, s-' mv,0 (per the Counry's Special Section for Mission Avenue) from ~ ar ork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Fork ~ (Harmony Lane) intersection. Phase III: z.~ ~ no c k o o., a anO ' m emmW ir~~~r•~~ ~ s. Construct north side= s'on A enue er the Count 's S ecial Section for Missi n v p y p o A enue) along the Mission Avenue frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission/Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary. ( . June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 12 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 6. Conditions of Approval require that Barker Road and Mission Avenue improvements adjacent to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance of a building pernut for any projects on that parcel. 7. • 0 2Lq-A1p~a.'~~g os i iim, LRimi. ye, Q~~' ir~ wt ib c , . ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ . , u. ,~lz~a~ • e a i, a ~ actr' - P~.... ir.m~~si►s or e.-ac 8. Engineers Condition #21 of Apri12, 1982AAeaning ' e u e F', ~mra-gd Order.r,~_qu~g• at,=a~t~i~p~o.f.prop.e.,r~ty LeiWn-width ong ar cer a 'cated ~a ~s~o. , e u t e n er. inc a~po ~ ion p~~mot~~~d 46W4he-tap,pl,ican ~I1~l1C8bjio. Right-of-way along Barker Road within the original approved plat shall be de&ated at the time of final plat f approval or vesting of any commercial rezone.lImp,,p.~er. nenA x_ke_rLRaa ~e „~ok~ne; : ~e br' dg o ker to ' ~ + , ' , , ~~i~~ ~ ~ ~~ht c f-~u -a,Y!~►ze.nra•phTa~~Y~ig p~~n~o•b~agr~eed t.~,b.,y ~ . e -v~ o~~.~ ~ . , , 9. Regard.ing the May 19, 1995, redesign Plan the following condition shall apply: (1) Temporary cul-de-sacs sha11 be constructed at the terminus of %c V Tippi Canoe Lane cannot be used as a public road turn-around and all other streets that provide access to more than one lot shall also provide an acceptable turn-around. (2) Improvements to proposed roadways shall be as outlined in the approved conditions of approval or as amended by the overall traffic analysis currently being completed. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated 14 ater System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. The dedication shall state: The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the Counry to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 365.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. Provided, this cbndition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the progerty as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the fb1nation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 3. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. ~ 4. Plans and specifications for the public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. 5. T~e dedication shall state: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 3694, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any a sessrrcent(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the rf~'rmation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 6. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 7. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection pernut is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will ~be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. " 2. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record andlor any attached sheets as noted. !i • • I June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 13 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 3. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the prelixninary plat of record for distribution by Spokane County Planning to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 4. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 6. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 8. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 9. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fue protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 10. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building pernuts within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building pernut due to failure of the plat sponsor to sysfactorily complete the approved water system. 11. Th~dedicatory language on the plat shall state: se of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 12. ~ e final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, purseiant to the water plan approved by county and state health 'authorities, the local frre protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and ter purveyvr, shall be instulled within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for t6lvidual domesric we-iter service as well as fire protection to each lot/tract prior to sale of each lot/tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Designldevelopment concerns include: ADDRESSING, FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION; EXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. (Note: The Division of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building pernut.) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT: 1. A traffic analysis shall be prepared for the Barker Road interchange and shall contain the following elements: a. Site Map (illustrating the complete circulation system) b. Viciruty Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution) c. Existing Transportation Conditions 1. Existing average daily traffic 2. Existing AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE- l 414-81 / Page 14 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 1. continued d. Projected Transportation Conditions with this Development 1. Projected Average Daily Traff'ic 2. Projected AM and PM peak hour level of service 3. Projected AM and PM peak hour turning movements e. Recommended mitigating measures 1 Mitigating measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D" 2. If the existing Level of Service "D" cannot be maintained a justification should be included NOTE: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (Sth Edition) shall be used as a basis to compute trip generation rates of the proposed developments. 2. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlined in the above traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Engineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property. 3. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require further review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely accommodated. COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT 1. To satisfy the requirements of RCW-58-17-110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recreation and playgrounds, the owner, at his/her option, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to mitigate the d.irect impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, open spaces and recreational facilities within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and recorded in conjunction therewith. the agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 an substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Department. Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligations within the voluntary agreement. Additionally, the owner shall submit a recorded copy of said voluntary agreement to Spokane County Planning prior to finalization. DATED THIS (0 DAY OF ~ , 19~75 ~ - ~ John Nunnery, Senior Planner ' ( Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane Counry Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate appeal fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date thiS decision is signed. . • i . June 14, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 15 and a Revised Preliminary Plat / PUD PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Planning at 456-2205. pc: County Division of Engineering and Roads Washington State Department of Transportation County Division of Utilities County Health District County Division of Buildings County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair Central Valley School District Fire District 1 Welco Group Inc, 1220 116th Ave, NE, Bellevue Wa 98004 North Idaho Engineering, W 4200 Seltice Way, Coeur D'Alene, ID, 83814 Consolidated Irrigation District Richard Mason, IPEC, 707 W. 7th, Ste 200, Spokane Wa 99204 BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN THE MATTER OF GRANTING AN ) EXTENSION OF TIME REQUESTED FOR ) PE-1414-81 / PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92•819 ) FINDINGS OF FACT "RIVERWAY VILLA" AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT, PRELIMINARY ) DECISION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND ) ZONE CHANGE. ) THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Michael A. Hunt pursuant letter dated August 16, 1994, has been r+eceived on August 23, 1994, and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G), Sgokane County Zoning Code and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision by or as the Spokane County Director of Planning. 2. The proposal for the time extension is located south of the Spokane River, east of and adjacent to Barker Road, and north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue in Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. 3. The Prelirninary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) plans were approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on Apri12, 1982. The development consisted of a manufactured home subdivision on 118 acres for 3651ots including open space and one commercial lot. The preliminary plat approval also included a rezone from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) with a(PUD) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. Such zone reclassifications are accomplished as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor. 4. The Preliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change original approvals were, in part, based on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the proposal. However, numerous changes have occurred since 1982, which require mitigating measures as new conditions of approval. 5. The Findings of the August 5, 1993, Time Extension decision are included by reference to assure clarification of the below findings, decision and conditions. 6. At the time of the preliminary approvals, Apri12, 1982, the Comprehensive Plan designated this area as URBAN Category. The location is within the Priority* Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted late 1980 with an effective date of January 1, 1981. The URBAN designation has remained the same since the 1982 preliminary approvals. The approved plans and zone changes continue to conform to the adopted Comprehensive Plan. 7. On February 24, 1983, the sponsor submitted a Final PUD Site Development Plan for the southern portion (S 1/2) of the project and requested a change of condirion to postpone the Final PUD hearing of the northern portion (Ni/2) for three (3) years. The request was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) on Apri114, 1983. The approved Final PUD Site Development Plan for the S 1/2 of the site consisted of a maximum of 178 lots on approximately 50 acres, which excluded the proposed commercial property at the southwest corner. The approved Final S 1/2 PUD Site Development Plan was different from the Preliminary PUD Development Plan stamped "Received November 12, 1981." Larger residential lots, consolidated open space, elimination of recreational improvements and redesign of the roads were approved. The HEC approved a redesign of the PUD that clearly deviated the original conceptual "preliminary" PUD map stamped "Received November 12, 1981." The remaining N1/2 of the Preliminary PUD was conditioned to acquire Fina1 PUD Site Development Plan approval no later than May 1, 1986. December 1988 this deadline was administratively (see Finding No. 8., 10. and 11. below) extended which followed with four additional administrarive time extensions (see Finding No. 12. below). As a condition of the last Time Extension approved on August 5, 1993, a one (1) year deadline was unposed on this north Final PUD Site Development Plan approval with an expiration date of September 1, 1994. i ~ ~Y~ ` S ~ April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 Page 2 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 Before the expiration date, on March 24, 1994, the sponsor submitted an overall (NI/Z and S 1/2) Final PUD Site Development Plan for administrative review and approval along with this time extension application. Since the submittal the sponsor has proposed and received administrative approval to submit a revised overall Final PUD, which improves the lot design, open space and road design. The Final PUD review is still underway and will be completed once this time extension decision is completed and the revised drawings are submitted. 8. On October 22, 1985, with Resolution Number 85-0900 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the new Spokane County Zoning Code to be effective January 1, 1986. The new Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, established an aciministrative process to approve Final PUD site plans. The previous Zoning Ordinance had required public hearings before the Hearing Examiner Committee to approve Final PUD site plans. 9. The project area was zoned Agricultural (A) at the time of the Apri12, 1982, preliminary approvals. The existing zoning of the property described in the- application is presently zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR.-3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE-286-57) and redesignated to UR-3.5 on January 1, 1991, consistent with the PROGRAM TO INPLEMENT TBIE SFOKANE COUNTY ZONING CODE. Note, as each phase of the preliminary plat is finalized and recorded with the County Auditor the existing UR- 3.5 zoning will be reclassified to comply with the original zone change approval on Apri12, 1982, pursuant the PROGRAM TO IWLEIvENT. The project area with the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone will be substituted with the present Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) and the present PUD overlay zone. The old approved Commercial (C) Zone will be substituted with the present Community Business (B-2). Any development of the proposed plat and planned unit development will need to conform with the current Zoning, Planned Unit Development, and Subdivision standards. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal will conform to the requirements of the approved zone reclassifications to UR-7 Zone with PUD Overlay Zone and the B-2 Zone. 10. March 18, 1986, Spokane County adopted specific criteria for administratively considering the Extension of Time regarding the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. Extension of time decisions no longer require a public hearing before the HEC. The time extension criteria is found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Board of County Commissioner Resolution Number 86-0246). 11. November 1986, the Planning Department granted its first administrative (without public hearing) time extension for 2 years under the authority of Chapter III, Secrion G of the amended Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. This 1986 Extension of Time approval amended and extended the previous conditions of approval regarding all specific deadlines of the April 14, 1986, Hearing Examiner Committee decision. This extension included the N1f2 Final PUD deadline of May 1, 1986. 12. This Time Extension application is the seventh (7th) request for a time extension. The total life of the Preliminary Plat, PUD and Zone Change has been thirteen (13) years: April 1982 to April 1983 Preliminary approvals - HEC April 1983 to April 1986 ..................3 years granted with change of cond.itions - HEC Nov 1986 to Dec 1988 2 years (see Finding No. 11. above) - Ping. Dept. Dec 1988 to Jan 1990 ......................2 years - Ping. Dept. Jan 1990 to Jan 1992 .......................,2 years - Ping. Dept. - Jan 1992 to Jan 1993 1 year - Ping. Dept. March 4, 1993 Time Extension Denied for lack of progress March 12, 1993 Appeal of Denial and additional information provided May 24, 1993 Time Extension administratively Approved with current condidons June 3, 1993 Appeal of new and updated conditions-of-approval Aug 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee public hearing scheduled and advertised July 1993 additional information provided July 27, 1993 appeal withdrawn by Jim Reuter July 29, 1993 withdrawal confirmed by project legal council, F. J. Dullanty, Jr. Aug 5, 1993 administratively amended the May 24, 1993 Time Extension conditions August 1993 to September 1994......1 year - Ping. Dept. August 23, 1993 HEC withdrawal of appeal ORDER (see Finding No. 13. below) The above stated chronology does not include the processing time for which approval had lapsed during review or appeal of decisions for each time extension request. Complete and timely requests for any future time extensions shall be consistent with RCW 58.17.140 and the Spokane County Planning Department Subdivision Ordinance. Timely requests for consideration of rime extensions are the applicant/developer's responsibility as notices of expiration of approval by the Spokane County Planning Department are not regularly provided. When said notices are provided they are done so only on a courtesy basis. April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 3 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 13. The appeal of conditions of approval added to the administrative May 24, 1993, Time Extension approval was advertised and scheduled for the August 19, 1993 Hearing Examiner Committee (HEC) public hearing. Due to amended conditions of the administrative August 5, 1993, Time Extension approval, the appellant, Jim Reuter, withdrew his appeal by letter dated July 27,1993, as did the project attorneys by letter dated July 29, 1993. The agenda item was not presented at the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing. The Hearing Examiner Committee signed FIlVDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER on August 23, 1993, which states: ORDER "The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, accepts the withdrawal by Jim Reuter, of the application of the Preliminary Plat of PE-1414-81 described in the application known a Riverway Villa." MOTION "UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RIVERWAY VILLA AND RENDER THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND APPEAL OF THE EXTENSION OF TIME NULL A1VD VOID. " This order and motion was based on Finding No. 2, which incorrectlv states: "2. On July 29,1993, the Spokane County Planning Department received a written request from the appellant, Jim Reuter, to withdraw the preliminary plat of Riverway Villa. The Hearing Examiner Committee, by accepting the withdrawal, renders the preliminary plat and appeal of the extension of time null and void." The evidence within file PE-141481 indicates the Preliminary Plat and PUD sponsors clearly intended to keep the project alive and, in fact, only requested to vVITMRAW TBE APPEAL from the August 19, 1993, HEC hearing agenda, since the issues with the conditions of approval had been administratively resolved with the County Prosecutor's Office and the Planning Department administration. While the August 23, 1993, Hearing Examiner Committee FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER could have been written more clearly, all references to withdrawal a.Rplies onlv to the appeal and not the overall preliminary approvals. 14. This development and its approvals have exceeded its four (4) year grace period (the first 3 year expiration period and 1 additional year) where additional conditions cannot be applied to the original approval, as provided in RCW 58.17.140, ExTENSIONS. All time extensions thereafter may have additional conditions of approval added or updated as each subsequent rime extension is granted. The upgrading of conditions allows Spokane County to bring development approvals into compliance with present adopted policy and regulations while addressing current conditions and resolving cun-ent problems or impacts. 15. The application for this time extension has been evaluated using the below adopted criteria. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this time extension decision. Section G states; Approvad of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and follows with "Upon application for time extension , the Planning Director or designee may administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided ar least one of the following circumstances is found to appdy: 1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been fcnaliaed since the last extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval RESPONSE: No portion of the site has been finalized or recorded as a final plat. However, Phase One (371ots in the southwest corner with a public sewer system excluding the commerciai site) is presently being reviewed for Final Plat approval to be recorded with the County Auditor. 2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as density and other development provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his plat, which shall include but not be limited to: a. surveying the lots within the development, b. arranging for public services to the site, c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat, d. the completion of studies or other requirements whfch were part of preliminary . plat approval. . RESPONSE: Correspondence from North Idaho Engineering dated August 16, 1994, received by the Spokane County Planning Department on August 23, 1994, indicates that progress has been made towards finalizing the project. That progress is summarized as follows: 1 f ~ \1 April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 4 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 a. Survey calculations of the entire first 371ot Final Plat Map have been performed. b. Public utilities to the site have been amanged. c. Construction financing has been secured and is in place pending release of construction permits by the Spokane county Engineering Department. d. Sanitary Sewer Improvement Plans including lift station design have been submitted to the Spokane County Utilities Deparnnent. f. The Final PUD Plan for the southerly 1/2 of Riverway Villa has been approved the northerly 1/2 has been submitted for administrative review and approval as provided for in Chapter 14.704, Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning Code. g. The mitigation agreement with the Central Valley School District has been executed. h. Landscaping plans for Indiana Avenue have been submitted. i. The draft declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions, articles of incorporarion and bylaws have been submitted. j.. Soils testing has been completed the results of which have been incorporated into the redesign of street and storm drain plans. Since the above August 16, 1994, North Idaho Engineering letter, Norch Idaho Engineering indicates that addidonal progress has been made as follows: 1. The water plan for the first phase has been approved. The water system with fire hydrants have been installed for the fust phase. Consolidated Irrigation Water District has accepted the water system and the contractor is has completed the pressure tests and is in the process of flushing the system to pass health tests. 2. A dryline sewer system has been installed for the first phase. 3. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for boring under the freeway. WSDOT has approved a boring permit. 4. Engineering design and plans have been prepared and submitted to WSDOT for Barker & Freeway interchange right turn lane improvements. WSDOT has approved the I-90 eastbound right turn lane permit. 5. Electric, cable and gas utilities have been installed for the first phase. 6. Street grading for the first phase is completed and "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 7. Curb forms have been pardally installed along Indiana for the first phase. It is "red top" surveyed and staked ready for asphalt. 8. A model home building pennit issued -and presently being constructed. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was condidoned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utiliry extension which the project sponsor would . normally fund. RESPONSE: This condition does not apply to the first 371ots however the developer has as indicated in the August 16, 1994, North Idaho Engineering letter that preparation of plans and documents to facilitate future phases have been expedited, including public sewer. 16. The Spokane County Planning department does find that the applicant has taken significant steps to finalize all phases of the preliminary plat of record prior to the September 1, 1994, expiration of the preceding time extension (6th extension). During this time extension review period additional progress has also been made as indicated in FIlVDIIVG 15. above. The present owners have purchased the entire preliminary plat. The sewer system has been designed, sized and partially installed for the entire preliminary plat, considerable engineering has been accomplished and is currently underway for a major portion of the preliminary plat and a redesign of the PUD is also c~ ently underway. 17. Additional conditions for this time extension have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and departments, including the County Planning Department, the County Division of Engineering and Roads, the County Division of Utilities, the County Health District the County I?ivision of Buildings, the Washington State Department of Transportation, Central Valley School District and the County Parks Department. Said conditions shall be included in the appropriate sections of this decision and shall not preclude previous conditions of approval for rime extensions unless specifically stated as so doing. 18. The Spokane County Parks Department has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 15, 1995. The Parks Department has requested a voluntary agreement be completed between the Pazks Department and the property owner to mitigate impacts to the County Park system. A previous February 1, 1995, letter from Parks Director, Sam Angove, also indicates their desire to purchase 7.4 acres of the PUD open space adjacent the Centennial Trail at the north end of the project. nna. r April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 5 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 County legal counsel has indicated such agreements may be required. The Spokane County Planning Department recommends the property owner negoriate with the Spokane County Parks Department to provide for appropriate capital faciliries as re.quired by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 58.17.110. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording this Final Plat in the form of dedication of park land or a written agreement between the owner and the Spokane County Parks Department. 19. The Central Valley School District No. 356 has commented on the proposed Preliminary Plat and PUD time extension pursuant a letter dated February 21, 1995. The District has indicated that existing school faciliries are inadequate to serve the proposed Plat and PUD and wishes to negotiate with the owner to provide adequate capital facilities as required by the Revised Code of Washington (RCV) 58.17.110. Review by County legal counsel indicates the condition requested by the School District can be required for developments. Approval of this time extension should include conditions requiring that provisions for appropriate facilities be in place prior to recording the Final Plat in the form of a written agreement between the owner and the school d.istrict. Note, the school district indicates there is an existing signed agreement. However, the request to add the standard condidon will assure that the existing and signed agreement will continue to be required and maintained throughout the finalization of this project. 20. The following facts and conclusions are also relevant. a. The applicantlowner should continue to show substantial progress toward complying with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of rime for the rema.ining phases of the approved Preliminary Plat / PUD which have not been filed. b. By reference F1NDIlVGS of all previous approvals are specifically incorporated herein unless otherwise stated. An attempt to include all previous and applicable Planning Department CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL within this time extension has been made by the Planning Departrnent. Due to the complex nature of this file omissions may have occurred. If further clarification is necessary regarding previous conditions, the file record and documents continue to be the authority and shall be used to resolve such questions/determinations. c. A part of the northern portion of the approved preliminary plat of record fell under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58, and the Spokane County Shoreline Program, WAC 173-19-400. Creation of the Washington State Centeruiial Trail along the Spokane River may have removed portions of the site from Shoreline jurisd.icrion. Review of a Final PUD site plan for the northern portions of the preliminary plat would determine if any portions of the site is still within the Shorelines area. d. The site is located within an area of Spokane County which was removed from the sewer exemption area on July 1, 1994 by the Washington State Health Board . pursuant to WAC 246-272-100. The site is also located within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). Any future time extension requests may be affected by the new exemption boundary; however, the project is to be served by public sewer. 21. The site is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (P'I'BA). Route # 18, Broadway Feeder, provides connecting service to the Valley Park and Ride lot located on University Avenue and 4th Avenue. 22. The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRIlVCiPLE A1tTERIAL and Mission Avenue as a MINOR ARTERIAL The exisring roadway widths are inconsistent with that specified in the adopted Arterial Road Plan. In order to implement the Plan the County Engineer has requested a 5 foot reserve strip along Barker Road and a 10 foot reserve strip along Mission Avenue to be designated as a Future Acquisiaon Area. Preliminary plat approval also required dedication of an additional 15 feet of right-of-way on Barker Avenue and dedication of 10 feet on Mission Road. Sidewalks are required along these arterial roads fronting and within the plat. The Washington State Department of Transportation has recommended conditions to mitigate impacts to the Barker Road and Interstate-90 interchange. Those recommendarions have been incorporated into this decision. The Spokane County Engineering Department has met with the developers representative and reached an agreement/understanding with regards to phasing and development related improvements to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. That understanding and conditions thereof have been incorporated into the Engineer's conditions as set forth in this document. 23. The proposed plat will be served by a public water system. Waste water disposal will be as authorized by the Director of Utiliries, which involves an approved public sewer system with pressurized lines to the sewer trunkline south of Interstate 90. ~ 1 l ~ _ - - . April 13, 1995, Ext,ension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 6 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 24. Recognizing the recommended conditions and Spokane County development standards, appropriate provisions should be made to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare and that the public use and interest will be served by plaring the proposed subdivision. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regularions, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. The Planning Department has considered the provision of public facilities cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. open spaces b. drainage ways c. public and/or private rights-of-way d. transit e. potable water f. sanitary waste disposal g. parks and recreation facilities h . playgrounds i. schools and school grounds j . sidewalks 25. The delay in issuing this time extension is the result of (1) change of project sponsors, (2) change of project engineers, (3) resignation of planner assigned to this project (4) an extensive review of the large thirteen yeaz old file, (5) the physical reorganization of the file (6) two reorganizations of planners within the Planning Department and (7) assignment of an emergency moratorium study. The review revealed considerable confusion regarding the file organization and content of the file and a need to clarify the ' record, as indicated in the above findings. This time extension has been written in an attempt to represent a current and complete status of this preliminary plat, PUD and zone change approval for the Planning Department Conditions (see Finding No. 20.b. above). 26. The applicantlowner has demonstrated sufficient progress to comply with the requirements of Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance for extending the expiration date of the preliminary approvals. 27. The applicant had submitted a Final PUD site plan for the North portion (N112) and a revised South portion (S 1/2) of the Preliminary PUD. Changes to this submittal have been proposed by the applicant to improve the design of the site plan (ie, eliminate double fronting lots, consolidate open areas, other) and will be resubmitted and circulated for agency review as soon as the drawings are completed by the project engineer. The proposed Final Plat Phase 1 area of the 1983 (S 1/2) Final PUD site plan has not changed. 28. The applicant has requested to call the development by the name "RIVERwALK" and will record all subdivisions by that name. DECISION BASED UPON TI-E ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, a three year extension of time request for PE-1414-81 / PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81, "RIVERWAY VII.LA" an approved Preliminary Plat, Prelinunary Planned Unit Development and zone reclassificarion is hereby APPROVED until May 1, 1998. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All pervious conditions of approval shall continue to apply, as applicable, except as specifically amended. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee and all time extension condirions, as amended or updated, shall be binding on the "Applicant." The term "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. This time extension is approved for three (3) years until May 1,1998. The applicant may request another extension of time approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. ~ April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 7 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 3. Additional Extensions of Time shall not be granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ord.inance is demonstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary subdivision and the preliminary planned unit development approval will become null and void. 4. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Cond.ition #3.) The conditions of approval shall apply to the "Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated November 12, 1981, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Find.ings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated Apri12, 1982, consisting of 365 residential lots and one commercial parcel. And the conditions of approval shall also apply to the "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated March 15, 1983, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, being the redesign of the 50.2 acre South portion (S 1/2) with 1781ots, excluding the commercial parcel. This S 1/2 is also the Final PUD Site Development Plan approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983. 5. The approved zone change, ZE-92-81, shall be amended pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. The project area approved for the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RNH) Zone with the old PUD Overlay Zone shall be substituted with the present Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone and the present PUD Overlay Zone. The project area approved for old Commercial (C) Zone shall be substituted with the present Community Business (B-2) Zone. The existing Uk-3.5 Zone shall be reclassified as each phase of the development is recorded as a Final Plat with the County Auditor. The reclassifications shall be consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record, except as amended by the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. 6. The proposal shall comply with the current development standards of the Urban Residential-7 (LJR-7) Zone and the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, as amended. The proposed commercial parcel shall comply with the current development standards of the Community Business (B-2) Zone, as amended. The entire site shall also comply with the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zone. 7. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #4.) . Except for Phase 1, the sponsor has proposed design changes to both the N1/2 and S1/2 of the project, excluding the commercial parcel. A revision to the approved 1983 S1r2 Final PUD Site Plan shall be subnutted to the Spokane County Planning Department for administrative review and approval prior to any submittal and review of any final plat in this S 1/2, except Final Plat Phase 1. A redesign of the proposed Final N1/2 PUD Site Plan shall be submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for administrative review and approval prior to any submittal and review of any final plat in this Ni/2. The overall Final PUD (N1/2 and S 1r2) shall comply with the current Zone Code, Engineering, Utilities, Health and other Spokane County development standards, and shall generally conform the "Preliminary Plat of Records" and the "S i/Z Final PUD Site Development Plan," see CONDITION No. 4, above. 8. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #7.) The final plat(s) shall be designed substantially in conformance with the "Preliminary Plat of Record dated November 12, 1981" approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on Apri12, 1982, and with the "revised Preliminary Plat of Record dated March 15, 1983" approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on April 14, 1983. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition applicarion submittal and approval. Note, if the proposed redesign of the overall Final PUD (N1/2 and S 1/2) Site Development Plan, described in 7. above, is found to be in general conformance with these "Preliminary Plats of Record" then the new project map will be stamped as the "Amended PRELIMIIVARY PLAT OF RECORD with date." If the revised PUD does not conform, then a public hearing must be scheduled to obtain the redesign approval. 9. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat and final Planned Unit Development Plan to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 10. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to submitting a final plat for review and approval which includes the commercial parcel, the owner/applicant shall have submitted a proposed PUD Site Development Plan for the commercial parcel and have been granted'approval for a Final PUD Site Development Plan for the commercial parcel. The proposed Site Development Plan shall be administratively reviewed and circulated to appropnate agencies by the Spokane Counry Planning Department Once approved it will be considered part of the Final PUD Site Development Plan. The approved commercial zoning shall be i.mplemented by changing the existing UR-3.5 Zone to B-2 Zone when the Final Plat is recorded which includes this commercial parcel. In addition, the Final PUD Site Development Plan and development of the commercial parcel shall comply with the following: April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 8 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 a. The Spokane County Planning Director has the authority to present the commercial proposed Final PUD Site Development Plan to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee at a public hearing if the proposed development is inconsistent with the below provisions. b. The Spokane County Planning Director/designee shall insure complianve with the development standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code. c. The Planning Director/designee shall insure that proper measures are made for compliance with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, which includes compatibility between existing or future adjacent land uses and with those commercial uses permitted by the B-2 Zone. Considerarion may be given to: building size, height, setbacks, paving, parking, drainage, landscaping, signage, lighting, buffering of delivery traffic from residential uses with sight and sound obscuring fencing (ie. five foot masonry wall), ingress/egress, and loading areas. d. The Planning Director/designee shall also insure that commercial uses do not exceed those of "neighborhood" and "local serving" type retail or services. e. The Planning I?irector/designee shall consider accommodation for "Park and Ride" space for public transit and/or transit shelters. 11. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) Prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial parcel, a specific site development plan (all or part) shall be submitted to the Counry Planning Director/designee. The specific site development plan will be circulated for comments from appropriate agencies to determine compliance with current regulations and for substantial compliance with the approved Final PUD Site Development Plan. 12. A final plat name/number shall be pnoposed before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. 13. Prior to filing of the final plat, the appropriate street address(es) shall be indicated. 14. Appropriate road name(s) shall be ind.icated. 15. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #11.) The "revised" Final PUD Site Development Plan must substantially conform with the "Preliminary Plat of Record dated November 12, 1981," approved by the Spokane County Hearing Exa.miner Committee (HEC) on Apri12, 1982, and with the "revised Preliminary Plat of Record dated March 15, 1983" approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on Apri114, 1983 as they relate to the number and general distriburion of lots. If not, then a"change of condition" hearing before the HEC must be scheduled. However, the "revised" Final PUD Site Development Plan must be designed pursuant the current PUD Overlay Zone development standards, which are substantially d.ifferent than the standards that existed when the "Preliminary PUD Site Development Plan " stamped Received November 12, 1981, was approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on Apri12, 1982, (see FYNDIIVG No. 7). Since the administrative approvals for time extensions are based on the current PUD Overlay Zone procedures, the administrative review and approval of the "revised" Final PUD Site Development Plan must also be based on the current PUD development standards, which renders much of the "Prelim.inary PUD Site Development Plan " stamped Received November 12, 1981, as not being applicable. Recognizing the "Preliminary PUD Site Development Plan" stamped Received November 12, 1981, as only a generalized PUD concept was first clarified when the S 1/2 Final PUD Site Development Plan was approved by the HEC on April 14, 1983. This approval allowed a change in the design and a change in the level of open space improvements from what was shown on the "Preliminary PUD Site Development Plan" stamped Received November 12, 1981. Once the "revised" Final PUD Site Development Plan is administratively approved, the Planning Director/designee shall ensure that final plats and the development of the project site: a. substantially confonn to the approved Pr+eliminary Plat of Record, and b. substantially conform to the approved Final PUD Site Development Plan, and c. meet current adopted development standards in affect when the Time Extension was granted, and d. comply with the condirions of approval (existing and updated), or e. if not, the applicant submit and receive approval for a"change of condidons/design," or f. if not in substantial compliance with the Prelirninary Plat of Record andlor the Final . PUD Site Development Plan, the compliance issue may be presented to the Hearing Body for review and approval April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 9 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 16. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be deternuned at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically dra~'ted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained. 17. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 18. Three (3) current certificates of tide shall be furnished to the Planning Deparnnent prior to filing the final plat. 19. Prior to filing of all or a porcion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. Ttie scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 20. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Tide Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Deparnnent. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road shall be designated as reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in addition to the existing andlor newly dedicated right-of-way along Mission Avenue and Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 10 feet of dedicarion along Mission Avenue and lS.feet of dedication along Barker Road. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measwred from the reserved future acquisirion area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, undl acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, dra.infield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway unprovements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 21. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a temporary cul de sac/stub road: Lot(s) , Block(s) are located on a tem,porary cul-de-sac/stub road. This temporary cul-de-sac/stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circularion needs dictate. 22. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 23. A plan for water facilities adequate for domesric service and fire protecdon shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Deparnnent and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproducrion and be signed by the plat sponsor. 24. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for complerion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plaL The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harniless fnom claims by any lot purchaser refused a building pernut due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. ~J ~ April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 10 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 25. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to the Wuter Plan approved by counry and state health authorities, the local fire protecaon district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be instadled within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the applicant shall provide for individual domesric water service as well as fire protecrion to each lot prior to sade of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. 26. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system. 27. The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domesdc and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 28. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 29. Approval is required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 30. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 31. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or unpaired. 32. The PUD binding site plan shall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadways and individual lot lines. 33. A copy of the homeowners/property owners' association articles of incorporation and/or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Department prior to finalizing. 34. The Owner shall negoriate with the Central Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks Department and submit a recortied copy of the agreement making provisions for public schools and parks prior to finalization and recording of this plat The agreement shall provide a written descriprion of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreeti to mitigating measure(s). The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that appropriate provisions for school facilities and public parks must be . made conditioned on a future agreement between the applicant/sponsor, school d.istrict, and County Parks Department. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District and Spokane County Parks Department shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Cale of Washington Chapter 82.02. 35. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use acrion. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Tide Norice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and sha11 only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice sha11 generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ J is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ J, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ J is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane Cou.nty Planning Department. 36. The owner/applicant shall coordinate with the local Fire District and the Fire Marshall to insur that adequate access is provided for emergency services. ' 37. Phasing shall be approved by all reviewing departments. Phasing may be modified by the Planning Department upon recommendations from county or state agencies/departments that proposed phasing creates impacts which can be reduced or eliminated by altering size of schedule. Mirigatuig impacts of traffic and schools shall be considered for approval of each phase of development. ~ . April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 11 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 38. Each final plat dedication shall make reference to the Home Owners Association agreements a a notice to potential lot purchaser of the responsibiliries of lot ownership within the subdivision. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A Building Pennit Or Use Of The Provertv As Pronosed: 1. All previously imposed condirions are still applicable. 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a P1tIIVCM.E Arterial and Mission Avenue as a MuvOR Arterial. The existing right-of-way widths are not consistent with those specified in the Plan. In order to unplement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right-of-way ded.ication, a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the rime when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. 3. As per the original cond.idons of approval: "A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportarion. A traff'ic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrad.ing, the developer will assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checlQng of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be completed. 5. Intersection and road improvements shall be constructed and phased as follows predicated on an agreement reached on or about August 4, 1994, between North Idaho Engineering and the Spokane County Engineer. Barker Road: Phase I: Construct Barker/Indiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5-lane section per the County's Special section for Bazker Road). Provide acceleration/deceleration lanes (sized per WSDOT Design manual), as well as inbound and outbound tapers. Phase II: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase VI. PhasgM- Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built out sooner as part of Phase II. Mission Avenue: Phase Is Construct Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Construct north sic of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Secrion for Mission Avenue) from Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Phase III: Construct Mission/Potomac and Mission/Yukon intersections. Construct north side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Avenue frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission/Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary. 6. Conditions of Approval require that Barker Road and Mission Avenue improvements adjacern to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance of a building permit for any projects on that parcel. 7. The aforementioned phasing is a minimum development program. Changes to this construction schedule may be implemented pending completion of the Traffic Impact Analysi(. for each phase of the development. . . 8 . rcno~~~ ~ ~ a 1 ~N~ ~ . -k:;)," cL w 6~ 15 ,A/K- - ` - ~e, a TA 0-TAeHA_Q afflk,-QJto ioatt- • ~ , ~ - April 13, 1995, Ext,ension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 12 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Watei System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. The dedication shall state: The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 365.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not tc object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. Provided, this condirion shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjuncrion with the fonnation of a ULID b either petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 3. Applicant will make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. 4. Plans and specifications for the public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by the Uriliti, Department, Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. . 5. The dedication shall state: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to auihorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which perition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest perition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to arry assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 6. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 7. Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities DepartmenL SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will bE made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. U: of individu.al on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 2. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. 3. Appropriate utiliry easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 4. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 6. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane Counry Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 8. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat 9. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protecrion district and the.appropriate health authorities. The health autliorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. ~ ~ r 7 April 13, 1995, Extension of Time File No. PE-1414-81 / Page 14 PUDE-1-82 / ZE-92-81 COUNTY PARKS DEPARTMENT 1. To sarisfy the requirements of RCW-58-17-110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recreation and playgrounds, the owner, at his/her option, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to nutigate the direct impacts that the subdivision has on public pazks, open spaces and recreational facilities within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and recorded in conjuncrion therewith. the agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 an substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Department. Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligarions within the voluntary agreement. Additionally, the owner shall submit a recorded copy of said voluntary agreement to the Spokane County Planning Deparnnent prior to finalizarion. DATED THIS DAY OF , 19_. Wally Hubbard, Planning Director For: John Nunnery, Senior Planner and Micheal E. Nicholson, Planner I Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate appeal fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is signed. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456-2205. pc: County Division of Engineering and Roads Washington State Department of Transportation County Division of Utilities County Health District County Division of Buildings County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair School I?istrict Fire District Purveyors Sponsor Surveyor/Engineer Parties of Record File ul. LJ/ tlo 11: !0 d'L4 O4/0 4;Ul114 L t 15110ialOtCKS to (JU'L i' . ' ' ► ~..i ° " ' ` . P O► K A N tz*~ •C.? LI N'1' Y . Oftff Af T11E C:Al1NTY CNC:INEFN ~ . A nlvislQN Of TItE'rtIA1.1C, WOItK9 DETAR1iNEPli " , ' Rnn,~Ll t'_ I loimann, Cuunly En§i'i%acr ~ ' D~nle tii'. 9co11, 1`.C., Qlrecfnr . , _~c ~ACRCCMCNT ''n rAY H,i'E-s A.~ =s' _ " rY r " , KRNCINEER'S AGRJEWNT NUl1dnER P )q I L"I A- h ~w `•,1, a a : ~4, .'I"ii1s,h6"reerricnt~ `~l~chvecn S knne Cu~~n~ and St ~ n~~" _ , , . l~ Y AU ~1, ~t n . ~ p• , . . ; , _ - wli~sc in~crcit, tn il~e prn)ect is O_W_ n e i!` --Il. . . « • ; , tftis ~ - Jhy of = e _ - , 19 '~tria aSrccme»t i`s applIcablc tu flte rrnject r , _ - . - ~'~t ~ ~Vi~~ra - _ - - - , - . , iY._ • t.rt~ - h[~ _ ~ . r.': -"T1ic i4vicluals anci rnrliea nAmeil Iierein as having ati intefesl fn tlor. sihnvit JeSCribed pioperly oi' thc 'fi,llr,witig. ~ , ~ 1: Reiml'mrar. :Srkane COUnty Evf rfii)r.Ct irevlew oiiJ inspectian Eccs us spcLti(i'ec3 in ' iC}iapicir 9.14' oE Ilie 5pnkii,fie County C04. 71ic fcce *lll' he h~~eJ oii actual a0lary cnsts inceirrcJ lty SlK~iknncCouniy for pmjcc! `rcvicws anc_l ! or inshecliona,rlus a teri ~ - ' hiCfC~itl eclininislratlve chargr, antl will •e fiilletl incinifify- as -AccirucJ. Any tiika l1ie.c ,e~ipcnscs' inctlrrei! in 1hG ' billing ettiaunfs, lo iricluJe eny tatc 'feca ok any.:n 'y,. , aitleetiun rcif an overduc accc~unt must bc paicl'0c~ot~!'ci Ific CotmtY'! 6cwplnncc of ilie rrojccl fOF Alini. y ~ ~ -'a~" - , • 2, Thc uitclei94ned agrces tliat ihcsc tcci erc disc iknd raynble upon receipt of tlie •billinB as s11-ec'IfieJ abova . _ . . . . 3,~ A,ny invoices nol raiJ within 39 c1Ays of lhe invoiee i"fate wilE be siihjectccl !o a late w~ ."fce chnrge fif 1'o per ritenlh (12% pCr ycat) uri Iti~; ~itipuiJ I,n1nitce oi thc accannt ~ I;nc! Any a"lecl lafe fce chargcs. In ,ailJiiian„ iE iny ou~stnneltn~ baMnr~ nn Pli~ ~iccounl f~c 'thfs rrajeet is na~ nAid wtl4~ie 30 clays.;af'~ll'ie fnvnice clntc. no fticlltec fcvitws ~f :t1ic~ pmjecl,daciirihcnts will be wnJuctiJ unt'il lllt ciilitc accc>unl bolance . i's paiJ., Any balancc on Ihc ac6ounf '(o't tlil't'rrnjcrt -ni)t paid wiihin 65 clajn, of the . , ii%voice dR'te mny result in legnl, ac1^loh,oie the int1a1,~,16h,of ollacr citllcction proccduree, . . . , • iiiclucling rcfc.rrai 1~~ a rxill~~~linsi nPct►r.y. '11i~ Sricincnr arill he liahlc fii~ any ancJ all ezrenscs incittrc(! hy thc Counly foi Iltc ccillccliori ot`c3vGiifne Acr:o+inlc. . ` . 4. Thc munthly billihs slinuli1 he ecnt in thc nitenilnti tii: . . IV/IMC: .Sf~n ~or~ .SpakGt4 _ ~ . • AbURCSS: ~p 72- Q /U e. I4 . , w,~ . . ~ . C►TY,.TrATE: Redmzw~ , . ' l'lll7Nls 19 . _ I lrn(Je:'t:slAnif tlinl faUure to pay,ihes6, Fee's may i~c_ault in c~clay In comrlelfnn nt aprmval of the project ar ~ otlur jioisilolc ianciions. - , ' • I~f Ifiis fee ngreeniatt Fs complcleil,bja 'sbmcone othcithan 111i Sronsor (i.e., tha . hrc~Jcci owncr et a prindrnl tn ~tlie. fiiiit s~i~rtsufi~g If~e jirdject). such as llie Engtneet • •4rai'gnin6 Ihe rtttjr.r,f. Iticn- .vtmrn eiii hntiimoih 1' 'intri' ihe SlHink.r speciCcallx eidhorizlnj 1!it Atenl lo 6eciile tlil~'-Fee Agreen*nt Ie 1HacheJ to lhis Fee , ' , • ' SIrNAT1'J11J? ;t?y:. (rRi rrr -rv,aME) "RETURN' YEGL'OW 011PY 7'Q SP~I*AN~Cs CO~U1V'rY~jHrINEER3 ~ ' : ~ ►1~W~r,een~ei ~fe• ~ROP1a , . . . . ~ w. 1026 ncci-Ow:.y avii. wa on260.ot70 tmn esR.it,nn ,=Ax (sW~ 456•015 • . ~ , . .v x ' . . . . . , ~ • ~ . . .y . . . r. , . ' +y. ' _ ' h. '.t 's_'. ~ ~ ~ - _ ' , • - , k~ ~ 01/23/95 11:13 9 3243478 COttNTY ENGINEERS Q 002 ~ . . • ~ _ ~ , S P O K A N 1: C U L~ N' 1' V QfiRCE Cf TtIE CAUNTY ENl:tNEtR • A ThVmQlV or T11E r(1e1K WORK3 DEI'AflIT.lENT Rnnwltl C. Itos mann, 1'.E., CuuMr Engineer Ornisiy Ivi. Scotl, 1'.C., DlrMar AGRCCMCNT 'Cn PAY H'L+'1?S ENCINEEA'S AGREEMENT NUMDER P Iq I'4 .A- . ~ 'I'his agreement Uelween Spoknne Cc»>nly and ~~r~~~Y -S~b k ct n e p• + j ~I'itc ol rs«~,~ whnse interest in tlie Jirnject is ~0 W r) ev- is entered into this d,y of ~e , 19 7his agrcc.ment is applicable tu 11ie prnject known as: R, I ►e r m ~[tOah . l e ~ d v, That thc individunls and rarties nametl lierein as having ari inierett (n NiP ahnve clescribed prope►ty ar jirnject agrce to the tull(jwiiig: ReirnUurse Si,nkanc Counly [or pnijrr_t ravlcw anc3 inspedion kcs as sprci(icd in Chaptcr 9.14 af tlie Spokane County Code. Zllc fccs aill he based aty actual salary aasts incurrcJ IYy Sp,kanc County for project rcvicws and ! or in9pecfinns phis a ten percent administrative charge, ancl will tie Iiilled montlily as ac:cnicd. Anr Cual billing amnunts, tci incluck any late teea or any nIlier eapcnscs incurred in Ilie ~ ufflcctlun uf an overJue account roust bc p1id prior ta Ihc Cuunty's at.-:ertancc of the rrojcct (or filing. + 2, Thc undccsigiuJ agrees that thcsc fccs are duc and payuble upon receipt of the billing as specifiecl abovc. 3.~ Any inwicrs not raid wiUiin 30 days of Ihe invoict clate will be stil)jcclccl to a lato fee c1►arge nf 1% per month (12% pcr year) un the unpaiJ I,:ilnnec of the accannt anJ any aw.nred late fee chnrgcs. Jn addition, if any outstancling balanr.r. nn tlir. necount for this praject ia not paid withia 30 etays af the invniee date, ao further reviews nf the rroject cloenments wi!l bti ctmJucteJ uniil tht eutice account balonce is paid. Any balancc on thc acaoiinf for 11ti1a pmject nnt paid witltin 65 days of tlre icivoice date may result in 1ega1 actinp or the initation of otticr cnllcclfnn pruccdures, including rcferral Icii a r.oIlr.c1inn agcn .ry. '11ir. Spnnsnr will he liahle for any and all • e:ptnses inentteJ by the Counry far the colleclion of overelue Ar.r.nomts. 4. Thc muntl►ly I-silllh$ shnillil {ie., `ent tn the rttentinn of! . NAMC: Sfl.~I'16o» ~5~, no 4• P, ADURESS: -L-6 72-0 V. e. I4 t~ crrY. srAT E: l2ed , Gvi4 Z1P coDF: 919015-2 1'11ON1, I ungIerstAnii tltAt Faiture tn pay [hecc fees may result in c{clay in uomplctinn or apProval of the prnjcct ar other rossiblc sanctions. ❑ (f tlus fee agrcemcnt is comnlcteet by sameone other tlian flte Sponsor (t.e.. the rroject awner er a prineiral tn the tirm srxlnsoring tilc rrnject), sucli as tlie Engineer ctcslgning Ilsc rrtijr.G, lhcn wrllicn authniizaiiun rratin the SlxmSo1' speciGeally enthorizin6 llrr Agent to esecnte thl9 Fee Agreament js attached to lhis Fee Agrccmcnt. ~ s SiGNA71JRL Dy: (PRINT NAME) .TV ENCENEERS ROURH Y TC) 5V1{ANJJ~ ►Vwpeeme..rea e/Ms , . W.1t126 fltruslwny Avp. Spekaiw, WA M60•0170 ('1ffT1) 45R•361111 FAX (549) 456•4715' e^ Addendum to ATTACHMENT "A" DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF WORK Riverwalk Phase 4 (30 Lots) (Now referred to as Riverwalk 2nd Addition Consisting of 14 lots) The following services are hereby added to the WORK AUTHORIZATION for Riverwalk 2nd Addition, Special Services Section B: 1. The minimum scope of these construction engineering services includes, but is not limited to: A) Periodic observation and reporting of construction activities on this project; B) Maintenance of all construction records related to this project, to include, but not be limited to daily inspection reports, manufacturer's certifications, material test reports, and correspondence; C) Assurance that the construction of the roads and appurtenant drainage facilities is according to the certified and approved plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual; D) Staking and Monumentation as outlined under Basic Services; E) Development of Record Drawings; and F) Coordination of the testing of construction materials for compliance to the plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the ~ WSDOT Construction Manual. Actual materials testing to be perforrned by others and billed separate from Inland Pacific Engineering billing. 2. Prior to acceptance of the roads and drainage facilities by Spokane County, the Engineer shall submit all construction records and the Record Drawing to the Spokane County Engineer. The services described herein will be performed as needed and billed on the basis of time and expense as outlined in Attachment "D". You should budget $4,200.00. Accepted: Inland Pacific Engineering Accepted: S to D lopment by: Title 46VS by: Title 9:< date: date: ~ ` . N ~r ~ . • 1 ' 1.2 ~ S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director October 24, 1995 Edward Dean Stanton Spokane L.P. 16720 NE 116th Street Redmond, WA 98052 SUBJECT: VP1414A - Riverwalk lst Addition Stop Work Order - Unauthorized Construction in County Right of Way Dear Mr. Dean: I have been informed that you are performing construction work in Spokane County Right of Way for Indiana Avenue without a permit, as well as without accepted road and drainage plans. I am notifying you that you are in violation of the provisions of Spokane County Code §9.14 and §9.40. Under the provisions of Spokane County Code §9.14 and §9.40 , I am hereby directing you to immediatelvi cease all construction-related activity within the public Right-of-Way on this project. If you continue with construction-related activity within the public Right-of-Way on this project after receipt of this letter, I will contact the Spokane County Sheriff's Department and notify them to enforce this stop work order. In addition to ceasing all construction-related activity within the public Right-of-Way on this project, you are directed to properly secure all excavations so as not to present a nuisance, attractive or otherwise, to the safety of the general public. In order to receive a permit for work in the public Right-of-Way on this project, road and drainage plans meeting the requirements of the Spokane County Road Standards must be submitted, and receive acceptance from the County Engineer, as noted in Section 5.01 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. To date (as of 11:00 a. m. October 241 1995) the plans for this project have not been accepted by the County Engineer's Office, nor has any permit been issued. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . . w ~ ~a Edward Dean P1414A - Riverwalk lst Terrace Addition Stop Work Order October 24, 1995 Page 2 of 2 In addition, my representatives observed (in the morning of October 24, 1995) several items which will have an impact on the acceptance of this road: a. There was apparently no construction inspector visible on the site, with road base course and concrete curb work in progress; b. The curb on the south side of Indiana appeared to have not been adequately protected from the weather, in that the pockmarked finish indicates exposure to rain; and c. The gutter portion of the Type "B" curb was found to be only S lh" thick, instead of the 6" thickness required in the standards. These observations indicate to me that the construction inspection effort by your agents on this project is sorely insufficient, and immediate corrective action is required to ensure that all work to be installed is constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications. Failure to ensure that the work is properly constructed will preclude the County from accepting the work. Any surety posted for the construction of this work will not released or reduced until all the work has been demonstrated to meet the specifications. I am also advising you that without a permit, the County will not be able to finalize the plat. Should you need any clarification on the content of this letter, please call me at 456-3600 to establish a mutually convenient time to meet and discuss your questions. I am also expecting that you will call to inform me of the corrective action you are taking. S incerely, . Lw William A. Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer cc: Project file Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Heminings Terry Lightfoot Dennis Scott Spokane County Prosecutor's Office: Jim Emacio, Mike Dempsey IPEC: Todd Whipple • FAX COVER SHEE _ 2a~ SFOKANE COUNTY FAX # (509) 324-3478 & PHONE # 324-3478 - ENGINEERS 3RD FLOO 1026 W BROADWAY SPOK:ANE, WA 99260 - PHONE #(509) 456-3600 DATE: FAX (a GZc) TO: ob Q,~,n1 COMPANY: 1&*N CaN3772 ~ CITY / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 FROM: &1:t -;~/v5 , ~.rl • /4r~ Cour~{'~f 6S/ MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: 4newdn►~ ~DU~5 1~u~J~~ ~ FAX COVER SHEE'"-,-, trwe4z* SPOKANE C4UNTY FAX #(509) 324-3478 & PHONE # 324-3478 - ENGINEERS 3RD FLOO 1026 W BROADWAY SPOKf1NE, WA 99260 - PHONE #(509) 456-3600 DATE: FAX 4J~6 - TO: COMPANY: CITY / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): ~ FRO M: 1~ a~rcS P-~. A~r+G ca~NT' f etd^cz-2- MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: r . CIFIC ENGINEERINC - TRANSMITTAL INLAND PA 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 - . :.::::r:;.::::•::; ? . : ~ O'•'v" ' _ ' f. _ , ~;,ti.-'':...'~''ti'~;~~.•~' : kane CountY En9ineering . : . TO: S o . r..:::::::- . . : P dwa ,.z.:: . a Bro W. 26 10 Y 170 -0 p •.r:~z-•-::-. : kane Wa. 99260 `;r S P . . . . ~ M•J. . J::: •.t::::.: • f.•}.~ •:1.. : . . i ~ • , i~~~alk . ...d:.:.: - -4 {ON: Paul Lennemann ATT . : . ENT . ~t. ~.t~.14. ~ < ~ .;r::::: . . . - . . ~ . . . . . . : . . . . r;•r::. . . ::v...:. ~ - :::::;.c:~:;~: ::;>;i:;:c~:::r::::it<.i ~ _ • - . -:,,•;:.:;-•~='-~~••'•i::;:~: ;t >i ±:t~.s: r::>:•>::::::.t•n•::: ~ • ::v ~ ,1. ` . •414A, P•14B . f• •~C;f:::=:;~>:;~:r: 6S•: 41 .L,.... . . .:r.: . ECT P J O PR ..i~.':•.•.r::•.'=.='.~::: !.1'~.; , . f y'{.'~ v::•: ~ . ~~~t<~:'.'~~.•~'.' ~ . " ~'{y . ti..... ' :'{:;,'v_ . . ~ - - ~ . Description: . ■ Prints ❑ Copy of Letter ❑ Copies of app. plans ❑ Original Drawing 0 Contract Documents D 0 Work Authorization D Drainage Report 0 No. Copies Description 1 Preliminary Plat Map Purpose ■ Information O Review & Comments ■ Per Your Request D Written Approval 0 Signature & Return 0 Remarks . Paul- Please review the Preliminary Plat provided. If you require any further information, or feel the pavement design is incorrect based on the traffic counts, please let me know as soon as possible. Piease feel free to call me with any further questions. si9ned: ~ RECEIVED . j Bruce A. Howard, E.I.T. cc• . file nCT a 4 1995 ~ . : SPOKf►idL I;UUNTY ENGiNEfR ~ AL ~ I a PL4NA i ,4' i:. r ~ S P O K A N E 4 s: , C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGIIEERING AND ROADS ~ A DIVISIO:v OF THE PLBLIC WORKS DEPARTNiENT WilIiam A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E„ Director Apri13, 1997 Todd Whipple, P.E. Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spukane, WA 99204 SL'BJECT: P1414G - Riverwaik 3th Addition Plan Submittal (IPE letter dated March 19, 1997) Gentlemen: We have considered your request, and have reviewed uur files for the various phases of the Riverwalk project. The primary access point is located at the easterly end uf Indiana in Riverwalk bth. It appears that access to Riverwalk 8th is, by any routing plan, availabie only by traveling some distance on Indiana Avenue. At our last site visit un April 1997, Indiana had not yet been paved from the east boundary of Riverwalk ?nd, through Riverwalk 6ch, to the access point for Riverwalk 8th. We would like to note that the plat approval for Riverwalk 7th was granted in spite of the lack of approved plans for the Barker Road improvements. Those improvements became necessary due to the lot threshold which IPE had indicated would require those improvements. The plan acceptance of Riverwalk 7th was noc affec:teci by the acceptance of Indiana, as che primary access to most of the Riverwalk 7th lots is expected [o uc;cur firom Mission Avenue. The Cuunty has been working with IPE since at least the Spring of 1996 on developing che construction cioc;umentation for those phases of Riverwalk wilich constructed Indiana, and the supponing drainage facilities, up to the westerly boundary of Riverwalk 6th (phases 1, 2, and 3). This was all so that following phases which access Indiana could have plans submitted and plats approved. The first submittal of the Record Drawings and supporting documents for phase 1 was received in November 1996, and comments were returned in December 1996. To date, the actions neces.sary to address the various comments noted in uur review of IPE's submittals for phases 1, 2, and 3 have not yet been completed. We acknowledge receipt oti the Phase 1 Rec:ord Drawings submitted at your meeting with Ed Parry on March 28, 1997. You also indicated in that meeting that the Record Drawings for phases 2 and 3 would be submitted by April 2, 1997. As you will recall, the plans for Riverwalk 4th and Sth also were not to be submitted until the Counry had accepted the wnsuuction and established Inciiana for maintenance. This position was taken so that the Sponsor did not get placed in the position of having to maintain and plow what would be the major access into and through this large subdivision until the roads were tinally established as Counry-maintained roads. This is similar to the situation in the Westwood Subdivision, with which you are familiar. It is unfortunate that this positiun had to be taken on those projects, but it was the only option available to the County to encourage some action wward the acceptance of Indiana. As the Sponsor demonstrated progress on the acceptance of Indiana, 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 0 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414G - Plan Submittal April 3, 1997 Page 2 of 3 the County relaxed that position to accepting the plans for review, and then construccion, with piat approval of those phases to be granted when Indiana had been established. At our February 1-4, 1997 meeting with the Sponsor of phases 1, 2, anci 3, we haci indicateci rhe Cuunry Engineer would be willing to consider granting Final Approval for Riverwalk 4th and Sth priur to acceptance of Indiana. 77ti.s, ltowever, was co►ttiitgent upon contittued progress toward the acceptance and establishment of Indiana. We are concerned that with the Record Drawings having been submitted, proLtress in prucessing the calculations to support the plan changes may stagnate. This will have an effect on the plat approvals for Riverwalk 4th and Sth. There are many items which can, and should be completed prior to the actual submiual of the Record Drawings aixi supporting doc:uments. Among these items are any plan changes which are contemplated. Pfan Change Requests should be treated in a fashion analogous to a Design Deviation Request in the project design proc;ess. If plan changes are necessary to account for field conditions, then the justiticadon for thuse changes, ro include a11 suppuning calculations, will need to be submitted, and then receive the Counry Engineer' s approval, priur to submiuing the Record Drawings. This is necessary so rhat (1) the processing of the Record Drawings is not delayed by the processing of the plan changes, and (2) so that Record Drawings are not returned due to plan changes which the County Engineer will not approve. This will also minimize the Potential to re-record any additional easements which may result from the proposed plan change. We are enclosing a list which summarizes generally the action.s necessary co address the ditterent categories of the comments provided. Please refer to the actual comments (previously provided) for the speciric items of concern. Our iile search indicates that calculations showing how the revised ponds meet GSM requirements ror water qualiry treatment and storage volume have not yet been submitted. Althuugh the County Engineer's Office is primarily concerned with the calculations for ponds receiving runoff from public rights-of-way, calculations for all pond revisions (including those which serve only the private roads) are needed as part ut the public record tior this project. We will allow the submittal of road and drainage plans for Riverwalk 8th and 9th Additions at this tune. In light of the above, we do not feel ihat it would be prudent to ac;cept for construccion plan submittals for those additional projects which can be expected to have their primary access from Indiana, until Incliana has been accepted, and estabtished by the County for maintenance to the point of primary access. This includes Riverwalk 9th, as well as Riverwatk 8th. Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414G - Plan Submittal April 3, 1997 Page 3 uf 3 Please let us know, in writing, when the other supporting documents for Riverwalk lst, and the Record Drawings and supporting documents for Riverwalk 2nd, 3rd, and 6th will be submitted; we would also like to lrnow when to expect any Plan Change Requests which may be needed. I would appreciate your response by Apri19, 1997. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry, either by letier, or by telephune a[ 456- 3600. Sincerely, William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer ~ r• Edwar~~J. Patry, Jr., P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Project file: P1414, P1414A, P1414B, P1414C, P1414D, P1414E, P1414F, P1414G, P1414H Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Johns. P.E.. Bill Hcuunings. P.E., Ed Parry, P.E., Dean Franz, P.E. Sponsors: Riverwallc lst. ?nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th: Ed Dean/Mark Hancock, Dean Housley Company, 16720 N.E. 116th Street. Redmond, WA 98052 Riverwalk 6th: Mike Hume, Tomlinson Black North. 8205 North Division, Spokane, WA 991-08 RiverwaUc 8th Riverwallc 8[h: Mike Miller, P.E./Doug Birch. Pacific Properties Incorporated, 14410 Bel-Rcd Road. Bellewe, WA 98007 I Riverwalk 9th: Mike Klicka, P.O. Boz 1455. Hayden L,ake, ID 83855 i P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases l, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports This list summarizes the Review Comments on the Const.ruction Documents and Record Drawings submitted to date. Refer to the actual Review Comments for specific items Riverwalk lst: ~.Asphalt depth: Credit rec'd from Inland Aspha7~ (per 3i11 Johns.,- No actioa necessary .Concrete gutter dep'~i:Cash payrr:en-_ rec' d ~r= Cameron - No action necessary ~.-:..,essi•.,p accelercltOr y: cross-ctut-_er at I^d-ar.a,'McMi' lan: str.zec.' m; - igation from Winkler (per 24 Feb 9% mtg w/ Dean Housiey C~). )Pending removal & replacement per IPE 28 Mar 97 Zetter Irrigation systems in swales serving Tndiana: sti~l need Ge ir.szalled, & Record Drawings submitted Need to establish vecetation in all swales ~ . Pcnd is sues : a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan ~:hange snowing intended :ept:11 Df topsoil & sod or ponds need to be construc-:ied per plans or topsoil ,::ests need zo be done & results submitted showi-nc compliance to GSM for ei~her organic carbon content or cationic exchange caoacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to be recor.structed, or IPEC needs provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w;calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM reqt's or ponds need t~D be =_r.structed per approved plans No t e : IPE's letter of 28 Mar 97 indicates -I:e actions necessary to acdress some of these issves. 2. Pond calcvlations need to address a11 affectad eiements of t-he pond design, including but not limited to: 208 volume, total scorm volume, 208 depth (floor to rim) , depth from normal curb flowline to drywell rim (minimtun of 0. 4') , etc.,. Fie1d corrective actions also need to consider these elements. 8. Mission/Harmony: Sidewalk was not located per approved plans. Plan Change approved by County Engineer did not indicate an existing utility riser whicn may interfere with the approved change. P'_an Char.ge r.eeds to be revised. IPE to resubmit PZan Change 9. Need to complete any remaining items on IPE's punchlist. When the contractor has corrected aIl IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchZist coiapletion to County Engineer's Office. J P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports Riverwalk 2nd: IVeed to compiete IPEC' s puncnlist When the contractor has corrected all IPE punchlist items, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to County Engineer's Office. Drywells at Indiana 11+54 (east end of Riverwalk lst) will be viewed as part oz Riverwal:< ?nd, synce they recey~.re runofF from swales in Ri-rer~.tiTa n d Grates at Indiana ~1+53: Constructed without required sump shown ~r. plans. Need calcs to show that new grate elevatior.s nr.--vide adequG*e capacity, or set grates to plan elevations 4. Need to construct souther-y interceptor swa--e, or adj ust irainage swalas acccrdincl•/ 5. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing 4ntended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per olans or topsoil tests need to ne done & results submitted showing compliance -z:o :~~M for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. U. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or IPEC needs pro,~,ride olan change requesting revisions, to inciude calcs c. Pond fcotprint not per plan: I?EC needs to provide plan chanQe wicalcs shcwing -:hat the new lavout meets GSM reqt's or oonds need to tie ~:znstructeci -er approved plans See note for this item under Zst Addition r. -rr4gat~on systems iz swales serving ?ndiar.a: st-.11 nee: '--e installed, & Record Drawinas submitted Need to estalc=isn 5regetation in swales Riverwalk 3rd: i. Need to complete IPEC's ounchlist. When the contractor has corrected a11 IPE punchlist ite.ms, IPE needs to provide written certification of punchlist completion to Couaty Engineer's Office. Ponds: a. Ponds too deep: IPEC needs to submit plan change showing 'ntended depth of topsoil & sod or ponds need to be constructed per plans or topsoil tests need to ce done & results submitted showing compliance to GSM for either organic carbon content or cationic exchange capacity. b. Ponds too shallow: Ponds need to re reconstructed, or =PEC needs -.o provide plan change requesting revisions, to include calcs . . P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., phases 1, 2, and 3 Construction Items - Record Drawings and Inspection Reports c. Pond footprint not per plan: IPEC needs to provide plan change w/calcs showing that the new layout meets GSM reqt's or ponds need to be constructed per approved plans See note for this item uader Zst Addi tion 3. Irrigation systems in swales serving indiana: still need to be installed, & Record Drawings submitted 4. Need to establish vecsetation in swales I . ~ ~ . 1 s- REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATI4N $30.00 5et a • ~c~E.. DATE OCTUBF.S 9 ~ 1995 ~ ROAD NAME IMIANA AQLNUB CRPJRID # N. A. NAME OF PLAT RjoMiAIJL 2ND ADDIT10N Plat # pE-1414A ADDRESS OF BLDG N•A- NAME OF BLDG PROJECT N•A- . BLDG# B9 S $ T 25 R 45 FEDF:RALJSTATE PROJECT # N.A. PROJECT LIMTTS N.A. EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 40" 40" ROAD SURFACE ASPHALT PAVEMM ASPHALT PAVLKENT AVG DAILY TRAH`FIC N.A. N.A. Current Traffic Count Design Year Tra.ffc Count PROJEGT DESCRIPTTON BIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION IS A 14 LOT P.U.D. WITH INDIANA AVENUE, A PIIBI.IC STREET PROVIDING ACCESS. IIMRiOVIIKENTS IFQ.IIDE PDBLIC SEWER, WATEB, STREET ApD DBAINAGE FACII.ITIES. PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATTON DESI(N AND CONSTRIICT A NOP-TYPICAL TEMPORARY OFFSET COL-DE-SAC. JUSI'IFICATION: SPOKANE COIIM FIRE DISTBICT #I HAS APPROVED TSIS RUAD CONFIGQRATION ON SFPTFMER 79 1995. THIS DESIGN DEVIATION IS BEQIIIBED BY SPOBANE COIIATY REVEIW COMMENT DATED OCTOBER b, 1995. (VIA FA%) PLEASB SEE A1TACffi~11T "A'• FOR PICTQRE. I SUBMTI'TED BY UqLAND PACIFIC EBGRING DATE 0(.'T'OBER 9, 1995 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TS SIIITE 200 SPOBANE, iTASSINGT0N , ZIP CODE 99204 ~ PH4NE # _L909 ~ 458-6840 ADMIlVISTRATNE VARIANCE FEE 4F 530.00 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY 1026 W BROA►DWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0174 PHONE (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 -REQUF,ST WILL NOT BE REVIEWF,D WTIHOUT FUNDS- C'ASH/CBECK # RECEIVED BY DATE ~ ~ . + DESIGN DEVIATION ~ STAFF R&,GOMMENDATIONS ~ j2r Approved ,4pproved w/conditions Not Approved ' Project Manager < Date / I r , Approved Approved wlconditions Not roved I ~ ) ~ ) t Planning & Traffic Engineer Date , ~ A.pp ed ApProved w/conditions Not Approved ( c) 23~1~ roject Mana~"gemen/ Engineer Date T~ ~ Z~N -d7d lJ72 ~ ri.+~91 . ~ ` =z 1 t r l~v 7~.~ „~',.,,<_~a~ 099 AD - ~ .Tr~c~✓7-s ~s~c.t ~s 4e~C'l._A e/ r Ap r~ /ccf&htlliiffns ot Ap ~0140 .,4 t ) (,X) ;Oe~ Operations Engineer Date SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEE 'S DETERMIlvATION: d ~J Gt./` GC~I r~'Z'• ~Q7`i ~ ~j ~ a ~ Z 1~ 2 wz- 1'4- Approved w/no conditions Approoved as reoommended above Not Approved AA Spokaae County En ' eer Date a~o / h / LJ.. / r ~ ~ - ~ - . /I f- t I 40' I I PROPOSED TEMPORARY ~ e6. TURNAROUND I f J t ~ . ~ . . , ~ . ~ " .i.': . . . ~ ~ / . , - R N ~ ~ . . TEMPORARY TURN-AROUND EASEMENT . . ~ ~ ~ . ,y , -7 .J I 10' UTILITY EASEMENT ~ I I (TYPICAL) = 1 ~ , . . . I NLAND ~ TEMPORARY TURNAROUND PACIFIC RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION ENQINEERINQ 707 We't 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-8840 ` 9 f 26/95 JN1.= n•, wA 99204 FAx: (509) 458-e8"Of 12/30/96 14:21 FAX 206 869 6620 DEAN/HOUSLEY LLC IZ 001 December 30, 1996 Mr. wiiiiam A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 DUAN RE; P 1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D., Phase 1- Indiana Cross-Gutter Work O)IMPANY Dear Mr. Johns: This letter ss in response to your letter of December 16, 1996 regarding the cross- guttec installation at R.iverwalk. We apotogize for the mistakes that were made in die completion of this work. In our eagerness to complete the lst Addition "Ioose ends" we made assumptions that were not correct. Since the cross•gutter was shown on the original North Idaho Engineering drawings approved by the County (with recent additional details for construction by IPE), we didn't focus on the fact that we were using a different concrete contractor for the work than the one used for the earlier 1 st Addition work. We have always tried to use reputable contractors that are knowledgeable and well versed in Spokane County standards and construction practices, as tllat makes life easier for both the County and for us. In this case I gather the contractor both didn't get a pennit, nor contact die County regarding the acceleraring agent prior to the work as they should have (and used 1/2% more dlan is nonnally approved). As for a ptan to avoid these mistakes in the future, we will certainly work more closely with contractors and the engineer both as regards the permits and the actual work itsetf. I am personally spending more time in Spokane as well while Nve work to complete the 1 st Addition items, and will work closer with Ed Parry and Terry Lightfoot who have been most helpful in helping me understand and work dirough the issues. Regarding a mitigating measure for the non-compliant concrete work, could you please sand ma a copy of the County rules that applied to that situation so I can iise it vi working with the contractor to make a proposal to you. Thank you very much for your help and continued undarstanding as we clean up the Riverwalk 1 st Addition work. Siiicerely, G~~~/,G~ `'"V • r Mark B. Hancock Land Development Manager cc: Bill Hemmings, Ed Parry, Terry Lightfoot, Todd Whipple, Verne Jacobsen 16720 N.E. 116th Street • Redmond, Washington • 98052 • 206.869.6618 • F'ax 206.869.6620 - - - - OEAR CUSTOMER: Date W WE ATTEMPTEO TO OELIVERlPICKUP A PARCEL(S) fROM: n ~ ❑ W YOUR ABSENCE THE PARCfL(S) WAS LEfT ' O ❑ WE WERE UNABLE TO LEAVE TFE PARCEL BECAUSE A G.O.D. IS DUE fOR S ~ ~ (Checks Must be Payable lo Shipper's Name) ❑ CoNec6ion Must be Cash Only. rn ~ ❑ WE WERE UNABLE TO LEAVE THE PARCEL(S) BfCAUSE WE MUST HAN@ A DEWERY SIGNATURE. ~ ~ ❑ SIGNATURE RELEASE Please sec reverse side ol this notice. ~ L WE WILL M.AI(E ANOTHER DEIIVERY/PICKUP ATT[IAPT TOhqHR04Y (Sat, Sun. and Holidays Excl)deC}. II no One is available, leave nute with nearby delivery inshuc6ons. ~ ~ ❑ WE HAVE MADE THREE DfUVEfiY ATTEMPTS AND ARE NOW RETURNIMG IT TD TME SHIPPfR ^ ~ UpS U n ited Pa rcel Service . ~ 012221 Rev 9190 (400M Pads 4193) or-VSV'lLl1L 4VLL1iL, Y~li.~tlll`fl71Vl'! TO: .TIld RAI}I{E I FRCK: DAVS BERTO DATE : ac tober 3, 1996 BUB.TECT : BOND P 1414A & P 1414C Ri VERWALK 2ND& 3 RD I The bond rur the above mentioned projects i-ai for the followi^g it?ms: 1) All the items cn the agFraved raad and drainage pl_:~s wi`.171 the excsptic-)n ~~t tize s(-,)d ror the "20811 swa1e3. 21~ A br7,?'iCi 1S: tlt~d b,J Nc'.r-,Lnrd TP.cLILaT!Ca' Gr''?L:p (_)ct(~'ber 14 `_f~ 13 tar botlz plats. $39, 726.14 For Riverwalk 2A1D 743 . 00 For Riverw3lk :3RD c : \wpdoc\dave\me_.►~no\iterns ~ aQ~ ~ 9 ~ F(Op~W(A V-k j r6 •oN iedd!US 113AWI A8 Aa1N3 GUO038 A83A1134 IlO3 oN eu!1 I sseippy anoA X aanleu6!S anoA Jenup agi aol uogeooi awns agl u! 3! 6u!neal pue aogou s!g}o6,ieud6!�noq asea!a sl! azuoglne asea!d 'ldwelle /Caan!!ap laxau ,aooeoollseys)low luenn no! y! pue xoq 3SV3133 3lil1VNeDIS gl p )i g p au; lI :U3WO1Sf1O E1V34 S P O K A N E ~ C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISiON OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director - - - ~ - r . ~ , . ~ ~ ~ i0 :1 t;. E. i_vr's't'. Z' C+t ~ ~ • • - 7 • N, r r-. ^ .4 . ..C~- - . - ~)r_• - - . ~ - . 71,rrr• ; r~- aar I J • A lw .r a ~ L./ • ~ J .~i • ;r rJ Y+►.r - ~ r.. r ~ ~ - ~ .-i ~ ~ r 7 ~ ~ • • v~ Y y~ A. fo V i ~4 v LA ~ u i .A r1~~~~~.r ~ ~ V ~ • ~ 1 l:i _sl._ 7J1 cl 1c3~r- v'_• f 1 1 ~ . v~.."...' r: . l'_ L: Ll ? ` ~ i-~!''*~ rr F ~ ` ~ r t 1 ~ ~ ~ h,~ i ' ` 1 C. M 1 1T . ~ ~l~,• f~' 4~~ -7777/~i-'-~i ~ ~ ~ ~ Y Ll •I ~ ~ ~ 'J ~l 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~..A ~ L 'a l '1 ♦ f ~ ! •1 f..1 ~ r ; Q ~ t•;..:~ i~z_; ~ f~~i j i` t-'r~Y!'~t1 P j'y'~ c i_~ r~+ { r 1:~ ~ r? i~?= r 1!^: Y1 QI r n 3r1 ~ ~lCt _s_ . ~ _ •i _ a - 1: !SC %~y'-J',r'? :(t fS rII~1~- ~2 ~n ~_ctt~fl, Gcit?+'4 ~~~~:L~a~• •1 z a- -a'~____.._~~ ~ . r;~ ~ ~ A. . u 3`-~ ~ '~'!e ^ ~ v ~ ~ . ~ i ~ ~ ~ v. v+ ~ r + ~ i ~ ~ m ~ . i ~ ~ r ~ •1 = ~ L :r T: ( ~'~.'h p / ~~i r '.i • ~J ~ Y u ~ • l i - ~ ~ ~ a t V ~ • ~ G _ • l_ _ J _ _ _ ,~r.~ _ . _ ' ~ v~.y.~. r- _ ~ " i~ _ [1 ° "`•+T ` 11 ~ ~ZJ o~~ = v ~ V I L • _ • . ?,T - r+ o • r - r F ; „ a . r+ . . ~ i• ✓ '~a ' ~ ~ ' ~ a _ r lY~~l • ~ ~ ~ ~ . Z' ~ ~ _ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 s AL Bond No. 5094288 . The Haartford Ynsurance Group Hartiord Plaza Hartford, Connecticut 06115 SUBDIVISI4N RUADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. (CONTR.ACTOR), as "Principal", and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, as "Surety", are held and fumly bound unto Spokane County, a political subd.ivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee", in the penal sum of FORTY-TWO TH4USAND, FOUR HLJNDRED SIXTY NINE & 14/100 DOLLARS ($42,469.14), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is a contractor to the Developer of a tract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into lots and known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS, and being located in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required that a bond be fiunished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs of grading and surfacing to the approved grades and typical section of the roadways of said Plat and the installation of drainage structures and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with the Contract Documents between Principal and Developer dated September 6, 19959 and those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications and plans dated October 31, 1995, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer. Such improvement reached substantial completion on or about October 1, 1996; however, such date may be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requuements stated herein within the time authorized, and upon delivery of the wrirten notice thereof of Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall be obliged to the Obligee up to the penal sum of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in ihe opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 2ND day of October, 1996. PRINCIPAL SURETY K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. HARTF4RD FIRE INSUR.ANCE COMPANY ~ By: . ` By: -t~ I t s Pres, deh ~ W.W. WELLER, Attorney-in-Fact K A 1 { I 7 ~ M[' S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERiNG AND ROAOS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director October 11, 1996 Ed Dean , Mark Hancock Dean Housley Company 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, W A 98052 SUBJECT: P14 iverwalk P.U.D. lst Addition 1 - Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition 1414B - Riverwalk P.U.D. 3rd Addition Submittal of Construction Documentation and Record Drawings Gentlemen: We have had several discussions with you and your engineer (Inland Pacific Engineering) over the past 6 mont,hs regarding the expected submittal of the Record Drawings and Construction Documentation for these projects. As you will recall, the County's original posirion was that the Plats of Znd and 3rd Additions would not receive Final Approval until all the work for Indiana Avenue was completed by your contractor, certified by your engineer, and accepted by the County Engineer's Otfice. This resulted from your failure to secure a permit for the work in the right of way for Indiana Avenue prior to starting construction. I am concerned that you will be submitting these documents at a point in time when the weather will not allow (a) a proper Final Inspection to take place, and/or (b) corrective acrion to be properly made on items of deficient woric. I need to see a submiual of all the construction documentarion, to include certified Record Drawings, no later tha.n 12:00 noon, October 31, 1996. This submittal will need to comply with the requirements of Section 9 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construcrion, as well as the guidance I have provided to your engineer in my eariier discussions and correspondence with them. If this does not occur, I will be forced to take ftuther actions as are necessary to ensure that this material is submitted in a timely fashion; these actions may include revocaaon of approach permits, restriction of lot building permits, et al.,. If you have any fiirther questions or comments, please contact me at 456-3600. Thank you. Sincerely, ~ ~ Willi . Jo E. Spokane County ngineer cc: projoa file Spoltane Couaty Public Works Dinctar: Deaais Scoa, F.E. Spolcane Counry Eagineer's oftice: Bill Hemmings. P. E., Ed Parry. P. E. SPokwaOmsfttoOf4mt''s QfU&A4VA'l@$,00-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (549) 324-3166 06/04/96 16:45 FAX 206 868 6620 DEAh/AOUSLEY LLC (ih001 ♦ ~ Dean-Housley Company ` 16720 Northeast 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 (206) 869-6618 Fax: 869-6620 Facsimile Cover Sheet Date: 6~& Fax Attention: ' Company: .(74bPOWIF C.Q. From: Martc Hancock # peges (including this sheet): ~ Camrnents: ~ ~ Z-L%T r o,v 4~07' Sp'zev. Gae" 6Qr ~'i~to" CAbB&!5~ ijohs • s ~ r t ~ 06/04/96 16 : 45 FAX 206 869 6620 DEA'V/HOtiSLEY LLC Z002 13U88910503 CASTLEWOOD GoH, ppi 1tiist 12120 Nurn Avcisiie ~ 1111011(s.1 `JV7 !~t['j (17p~]1 /tfl ~y ~ f~.7f15 Jui1v U ~ f+'s~x~ (Stly) Ayl • fi51}~ Sptrlume, NVA 99216 . . 't'O: ..~~~A~ ~'Ii~1M: ~ CAA HAM Ct)M1'J1NY; . . t`lii.)NRO NUt~~lls~:lt: 1'A(il:: ! f ~ ._....w............_. ,407- NA O,qL M rsqage.: • r. (1094 4,tc 4 A - t~w. ~ . _ . .r. w_ . , ....~~74 . _ _ . ~ / ~ _ ~~~,Z ~ A#.~ ~.~L~~_'_'• " , ~ . h ~ .~~~~~w ` I ` ♦ \ .....~Lr~.r..........~~~~, ~s c o !l_---.~..._ ~ . . ..r . . ..r_.--- . . . _ ~_/r.~ , . . . . v. . . . . . , r.~ . . _ _ . . . . . I _ . _ . . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ . , ~ . . . . . . . . ..f.. ' -+ww. . ~a ,~y ~ . _ . I I ~ . ~ . . - ~ . - • . w~. ti . . . • ~ 1FAXt:11s_._.. . _ . IIY:. _r ~ \ r o~ ~ o ~ ~ ; i ~ I I aad wde : de 966i be •Lmr izsz~6e : •uN 1111pu xd-4/ads. ~ luos "d : wm-i , SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS CALCULATION SHEET Description : _ ~ , P Project Na : Calc. by:. Date: Title: Checked by : Date : Sheet of Notes : r~`~f• _ i•~ . _ _ I - i - ` ~ ~ - . ~ i; . . , . ~ N~ ~ DE '~y 'Ro ~~GG _ I I f ; + -t _ ' . - - - - j--_ . ~ ► _ , _ ~ ! - - - , ! I - - ~ - ----i - i - - ' - - r---- _ - - ~ _ _.._.i Aj + ~ 1---- ~ ~ ~ * - - - ' ~ _ I . 1-- - T-; --i ~ . - - I : ; - - - , ~ . ~ - ~ - I - , I__ - - ' I.- - - . - - - ~ , - ~ r-.--j ~ ~ : - - ~--t-~- - - T-1 _ I - ~ - - - - ~ - ; - - ; ; ~ - ; -~--1 ' - - - _ _ _ ~ - _ - - ' - - ( I - - . 15098916503 CASTLEWOOD G,H, PO1 R ~ '...J / / l J `~~1/~f7tt r,l~~•I Misl 12720 Nurit Aveutio (509) R91 - 6505 Suitc G (509) 891 05(13 ~~tiolcn~~e, W,,~ 9921 f ' '1'U: ~nlN~ S S c ~ 1~1t{.fl~~t: e-44 e- A. M . (T)M f'A N Y: • .1,) A't`t~.: I1I10NE NUMBElt: l'A(:E.: f uf MeSSilgl'-; . . ' _ . . . . . . . ~ . ; • ~ , ~ . . . . ..._..~.._r.. . . . . - . . _ . - - - - . . . ....W . - 1s f ~ . ~ nn~ . irAXI:1)t _ A~~' ...__r...____. _ ~►~tt 1ZY• . 15098916503 CASTL.EWOOD G.H. P02 - , CATLEMOD HOMES Mr. Todd Whipple , lnltuid Pacific Lnguiccrin$ 707 w. 7th Suite 2-01) Spokanz, WA 99204 Scptcmber 28, 1996 Dear Todd, While this letter is addressed to you per,sonally, it is mesnt to find the ear of all that 1 havc dealt with over the last few months conceraing the ongoing difficulties in R.iverwalk. I am the builder tha►t has been caught in the middle of the Riverwalk debacle. I rcfcr to it as a debacJe because the,re are so many. peoplc and entities involved in the "approvai" process that it is very difficult to know wbere to go to or wtio to sce about any given problem. liiy campany has developod many picccs of propcny over the ycars; developtl►cnt% which at least an the surface, had many mare ohs[acie.s to overcome than any of those in Riverwalk. We have successfiully dcveloped property in naany cities aiid countic:s tbroughout the Statc of Washingtoa Wc havc dcvelopcd propcrty around wetlands, laruitills, lakes, streams (with fishcrics issues) and many othcr environment dly sensitiv c; issutz. W'e have been sua;essful working through the "No Growth" mentalk y of King ar ~ Snc~ho.m.~~L t: ounty.sunply by communicating with the people invalved. ! dn aot, cvcn fc, - a&=P? warr: yau tn helicve that t undcrstand the dynartiics of the prohlen- at hand.lR. i3 aFpzi : it ihESi; ha,s been a problem in the past and continues to be one to&ny. 1happer- to tic i~ct.s i,' inahe middlc ofwhat.on,thc;surface appc8rs io bc gavemment bureauti-avf an:.uai~•anununic$tiQn bctweeu;all involved. It is time thet a11 of us involved put aside what has taken place in the past and move forward in a constructive way to resotvc the issues at hand. lt is oac thing to have a Dcvcloper, an Engineering C;ompany and a County ctasing cach other around in circles, it is anather when we starr irnerfering wiih individuaYs that make all of our jobs possible, the public. I~NOUid U.- to t6aak Dcnnis Scott, who back in June played ari activc roll in helpinb to get itiverwaUc recorded. At ihc.time we we.re on the verge of a class actic.d isw suit by the cuizcaa who's livcs are very much effecteti by the "politics"of the approvi~ proccw. "nce :iacoTLd'Plmsc was cccordcd,, and.thox pcoplc who wcrc about to pay a: Wge penalty % rerc aIlower' t,) ciose on their loans and promd with building their homes. "I'he problcn is did na cmd ai that timc, . ' !t wa.sn't c:ntil Mter we had pickeci up the building Fermits, excavated, aud poksed foundatioa; ::A:y. 3ur next problem came up,-~;ontractors gcncraily will conncct to thrsewer s.ubs whil : th;, site is excavated in order to excavate once rather than doing ttis S8i71C w UTk- v YCr ;,ga1u, . . 12720 Usc Non Suitc G• Spokane, wA 99216 • F/►X (509) 891-6503 •(309) 991-6505 v 15058916503 CASTLEWOOD G, Ha P03 : We werlt for scwer perroits only to be told thai we could not hook up to the scwer u,iW Lhc: pumi) station W beea obscrvcd for 30 d8y3. Now kesp in rnind that the pump station reYerted to is an aGtivC systcm tbat had:siready had been through the inspection process and was actively sclvicing a mim'mum of 20 inhabited homcs, What we wamed to do was atr.a,ch to the sewcr stubs and bring th* into our houses wherc there would be nothing tlowing through the pipes for a tnuzimum Qf three monihs. We were du~icd beca,use of the "30 day observation period", in order to continue building we had to cover everyt:ning back u p that wa,s exposed, putting us bac.Ic into the position of doing the; ob twicc, ;vith thty 3 0 day deiay in the middle, : hirty da.Ys a$e,t the "3.7! day trial period" (60 days after our building permit,i viere issucd) we wei-eviuXy :xuck. In trder to install driveways, sidewatks, uadergotuld 1 rtwer, gas, and phonc Ave. l;ad co be able tu put in the sewcr liues. AZ the time I appcalod to Mark HancoL-k, of th4 L►c,:u, - Iiousley Company, for some belp in this mattes. A,ppuently Mark was eL.c to get an app; oval for out hooking to the sewers on a temporary basits. Our perrnit;, were approved with the stipulatioa thai, we could not move anyone into the krouses invoived. ln ;..aZity absilutely nothing had chswged from day one when we were not alloweci ta hauk.: up. W~ had been appro.Y.ed;to db now wtia someone couldn't approve us to do 60 daS•s ta lic;c, vil en the praptriy,was.~xcavated. Now we were allowed to pay :for the work the secc~nd ti,ane. This btiags us'~up to, vtirhGte we are today. ~ Ca.stlewood recernty had a c:ustom houac sold to Mr. John Cabillon planned on Lot g 81ock 2, uaaware t.hai therc were any problems revolvin,g around this lot. Luckily, %*fu:'S'iop/ because we afplied for our bzuldiug perrnit a week before John ciosed. One day priar to ~ John's c,iosin.g we were infocmed ftt ;his oQe lot would not be approved for building until the baiance of In+:,'aaa Street was improved.: It is,some wtat arrazing that our lot, in 8 t=rdrd_pha= c.:a.n wi. be built oa while the adjoirting lot (lacated on the unrecorded, un;mproved ;=}ioa )f tndiana St. tbax we are,waiting for), not aniy was able to obtaui aM A bwldir4; pcrr.ut t vt L. u nder construction...We cannot build until Bab Tomlinson dcvi lopstwrr. -yhis site, yet 8o~: k uuld ~11 a lat and $et a,-Rermit. ~We have autis, gutters, and paverr•.ent whilc thcy ha,.-e a pasti; ce. Mr. CabiUon w.as Qi,,ce,enough to select another lot which enablc4 us,.c► gu fci had another,custotn home for Ms. Nancy Creighton or. L.ot 1 Bloc): 4 ready to start Atter tho fiasCO,sucTq unding Mr. Cabbillon's lot we thought we would dc,uble che;,k with the County to make sure this lot hsd no "problems". We w.-re- asstu-W trnat it d.idn'i. We wcnt, fomard v.'th Qur sale ar►d submitted for our permit. AAftet' 4 days we were inforsned that we wuld not a"css our driveway to Indiana, until such time that the remainder of Indiaua St., tq ttlee East: is improved. Thc same lot is approved to access through the N orthera mast 24;.of lat:, :4ff Snake R.iver Lane, "lf we wanterl to wait unril Indiana is extended thcn we would bo'appcovcd for access", we werc told by Sylvia at Plarjning. Keep in mind that in the last 201 , where we can have access, ther-(: is a ~ meet G~,ht and a poc••er vault within the 20;: artid a.retcntion pond on the other sidc. K.cep in mind that with a two story hOuSe wc have tQ be 10' offthe property line. If we want to , build now we caa acws over and around ait of the above and swing a car around the swale to gct into Nanq'$ house.lf Naaq wu;ts to wait for au indefinite aruount of tirne, we c.an access her lot ttLe way the pl4t was #pproved snd act'oss a driveway approarb thatc mp.-I ~ I ts atreatly in placA.,, s.:.: • _ ~11,/ t~l. i: ~•J+.:,.. " ~ ~ ~ ~ ,f~' • f ~ .qJ:+.i ; . l4•y. ..:i;. , 15098916503 ' rCASTI.Ew00D G. H, P04 . , t ' ~ i`, ~ ' . J ' • 'k',j ' : , f LJ It is sirrular to the rttlergency turn,8rau~iAtthat had to be paved and curbed to get Lha plas rocprded evcn though it makes two lots unbuiidable until Indiana is icnprovcd. Keep in mind tha,t we are building in a pike*'hac in the first phase the emergency turnaround was simply driving off the last section of paved road whtrG you could turn s uuck around aaywhere in the pa,sturc. In ptiasc two that apparently wouldn`t work so put in concrctc curbing, paving, render 31ou wibuildablc, aad a fourth lot that can't have a drivcwsy on the An1y sids of it ttat makes sense, Nancy Creighton will get t4 live witb her ridiculous drivcway forever, long after the people-responsible for this fiasco have forgotten abuut it. I3ack to our .it ;er problem at hand. it. has been four months ssnce recording, it hns ~ been three montbs sincc the "30 day observation" period, it has bcen 45 days since tive hooked up to the sewer, and the houses ',are a-week to two weeks from completion. Keep ~ in mind that we are still working on the samer'ndividuals homes who back in May werc hesding into litigation because of the deZays lnc.urrcd to raord the plaz. Thcy have video tapes of Riverwalk compared to other "approved" ptas.s they have inore infotma.tion than ~ any of u$ rcading this bccause they haveib'eeir4nvestigating everythin8 that is going on out thcrc. Frach of us ha.s been involved in owc own::"acca" of concern, they have been i concmed with the everything. k, .4 7hese people all have mortgages an,.place;and house payments starting in two wgccs. '1'hey have all givea aotice where they:are:living and moving in twfl weeks. At onc tirae or another w-e have au been through this process and it is not an enjoyable time. This past week one of the attorncys involved caught wind of the ongoing problm a problein that hc thought was alleviatcd: with the rccording back in ]une. Wc now have all the iru3ividuals uack that were aligritd backin May. In a hugc unde,rsta,tement let me sey thai as a group we are not looking good here..,4. I may have mee a inistake, but I, presently have the flamrs cooled down to s flicker, wWi tht- isA a auce to the home buy,e~.s~44at aU the "problems" wilt be resolvrd in the next we.k. NQn4 ~f the individual bomeoyffidxs will ba affected by the "issues at ~Aand". To be hoaust with yoi, t can't even imagine:whavthe problems could be. l do know ,bat as the Bugder t bav( lite7&y paid the pric,e, for s.oineLhing over which I have no control, f ortunately, our reputation as a-.builder wili survive because the buyers of my homes do know the circumstancAs.lohn Csbillion, Nancy Creighton, and the balance of r,hc homc4wner3 involved are aware of the:,_el:,dollars that we hsvc paid for the sma, watcr, schools, and the various pernits foc~t~~"right to beuld and Uve in R.iverwalk". My fees were a11 paid long ago. All of the homeo,wners lives have been affected enough. it is time to get this problem rmlved aud to: puj: our. effons towards something that makes some sensc. Coliatircly, wc have a week to figure it out. Please don't view tlus as a threa[, it is noi racaux to be ane. We as the builder,; and our. home buyers have been on the sidc: tines while a:! involved havc struggled to go forward;aowing the individuals that arc being barmed by our inability to accomplish ourjobs ,and given the "Iogic" that surrounds t le entire kusuc, let it suff',ce to say that we neW-io~tmlvc this and resolvc it quickly. Lrt's get it done! I can be i-eached at (509) 891. 65,V5 ;and am more than anxious to do anytlung I can to hclp, Thank You, J I ♦ 'l+Tlri.~ ~f~ I T y .1,~~~~t y ~ ~f. ■ .1!4•w.ri.' ~ ~r~. ~ , , _ . ; ~ , 15098916503 CASTLEWOOD G,H, P05 . . . f • i" • ~ , ;I i.-• J,r i .ct.~.~' •X 5incereiy, t , ' , . . Bill Graham Castlewood Homes . ~ ,.;•.i = i ~ i , 14., CC: Mt. 17ex+lf l4 '~Jwtt; - $pOICa[1C COU11ly : , ~ • . Bill JQIUIS, SpwkuclC CUUniy't~:4'.: Mr. lirian Housley, llean - tiousley; Mr.L'd Deaa, Dean Housle . I Y Mr.Mark liancock - Dcan Housicy Mr. Cliff Running, Castlewood Homcs;- Corporate Purcbasers of Castlewood Homes: Mr, and N!1 s,KrAh MvAciur Mc, and MrsJohn Engebretson W. and Mrs. Wadc Cluttcr Mr. and Mrs. John Cabbillon Ms. Nac-izy Greighton . Mt. B111NVill1aIIIS . ` IY~.I. alld MCS. 1h`$ietbly Mr. I.cmau. W,udle ~,Y:,~'1°'.. ; i " ~ . . ' • i : . . ~ ' . t . ~ • . . R• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i e.97~ .6r e. ~ r ry •1 ' ~ ~ c22 ees.Qcr 4a,oe' ~.s4' 45 .os~ ~eroe 6 f~ TRACT E TRACT F (COMMON ARfa) (C0MM4N AREA) . ~a~w►~,c'~~saar~ E'cuueSm eY orw►wcE ~ a 1.526 S.F. 1.626 S.f. )qnma,,y ~~~;.'•5,sZ" ~ se7~~u4! oo~~ S8905015,Cw „ S5w8.w )5.00' . 4 u~i~ E~rr.7 6.16' 66.396 3 ~j~ z i IA ~ ~ ~ z ! ~-4 5 TRAC1' 9~~',=~ (C0141MON ARE11) o g~fo0.: l.1 1 S.F. ~ENCUU9ERED 6Y " ~ b 2 N A 9.720 5 F. N u e,sei ~,r •a~ ~ 7~~ m u + a a RA1ru~CE FASD+ENt ~ 2 9.1963 S. F. 7. b 1 2 S. i. ~ i 9125 ~ 19131 g A 10, ~ ~C~ e 8.667 S. r. . O W ti C E r ~ f 1912; 'o' w0E usuo~T ~ T k. E Su T.-n g~ a~o Z ~ >o• ea.+ Oh 19117 IL. ESIAT.. ti C ~ 1~ C 1 5' Z., m ~ 9 ~ m ~ J r ~p ~ ~ as........... . I ~ L~69.6~~ i 51.~Or~ ~ t • J N h N N ~~'~~~r ~s69~'6' r?~~~ , ,.~o- - ri•c aoo - ° ~-1Q' 'Mut •e J N ~ ~y~ ~ W UNPLATTED ,,71L. Ls@Ar. ios.za i,s.b' M~ HW4e~o~'E m 22i.4s c ~ o ,F h~ p~ 4 ,~A~ % _ r . . Si.S' R R, ~ c, {,,.,1~ , d4g ~Q'^' i► , ~67 ~a' ~ 67A0' Z . n SAlJrION RNEA LANE % " to• ~n > , w ~ ~ . ~ ..~A. ~ • 5~ . • , . :o' hr~'~.. ~ y (PRNATE.L~MIE) _ , . ~ ~64 , . 1Ek+POwiRr~~ I M u'~. ESUT. ~T ) , • , ' • • r.a a ~t,. . o' r 19128 ;ua~uaouv0 o ~ 1' WDE 0,,~~ •~;y:;%f e~' ~ Ui. Q f15EMEN" i ~ j A SnE'MAUc G~ n y~' E' o~ Z 6 z 7' m; U ka a o ~{~C.} un.~ sMi. o~, ~,A`~ SF e;,.~ s 3 4 ~ a „ o ea« S.F. N d 6 \ r ~ ♦ /'r\G/~ r ~ ~ 'r U 7.9 7 S.F. ~ 5.~l s d. ~ ~ a./{ L0Q S.F. - I gy ' ~ , y•~ 00 , 1.597 S.F. ~ 8.359 S • ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ' ~ .t • J ' b o 0 3 ~ g~ ~d; sIc u+ct ~ 19116 ~ U 19134 A u 19202 1 . ~ O'' ~ CC S f i EASE" ir N f 19122 Z o A iD• 2 3E til ~y 6.047 S.F. v ~ o 1 , 6 3.3 3' s . ~ 67.00' 67.00' 67.201 4 8.506 19110 63'~ ~ N89'48'OOr E 1.53' , 10' wnE 55- F . JnL :s~,r ''s 5N E 5~o ~ ~1 ~ 93~ •~ar C~~ s s~•' ~ q.p~~e ap'9~j• N7~6~.3°~ ,.G ~ ~6~ 6ti • ~ ' ,~'01~` ~ ~ s~ , , S29"59'51f E- ! .'s N - ~ `o y h ~9 g6 27.01 . ~ 16' w10E ► ~ ~ . / ~ • '.A w Cl~ & C, Afl4l'T ~ u T. ~OH RNER I.ANE l. tp e.507 s~r. (PR~T c E) )N AREA) 1fAED Br 0 ~~~r 1jj -E ~ UNPLATTED r~' o { s,r. CD ~ ~ . • 1 Spokane County Staff Review Checklist for Pre-Submittal Meeting , J Project Name: P"maz fkZ ~-3 Project Number: t~ g Project Sponsor: Sponsor's Engineer: Design Firm: Engineer: Wa Meeting Date: Meeting Time: Of3b County StaffPresent at Meeting: ~ M4~ Other Meeting Attendees: ~ Hr~~P~Eul~a~ ' name/representing tdP~Wg sTOI. name/representing ~e~~t'A~r►S nameJrepresenting name/represcnting The Following Items need to be Discussed w/ the Design Engineer General Items 1. List any special requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval, EIS, or MDNS. 1(7s7t,L 4wuwx TUK00C @PAq AN&!M$K lie - ft1qR 7b description reference 4" ~ uuso. e~ I~.O~D description ~T reference r~~ 1~~ - ~n5~ ~aor~ description reference K %-ct& S~Gt~1~S ~A~Ip~ .lt~P "t'o ~ deseription reference 'ft%kP Cut,• 1c -OAr4 dW«i*s o g descnption reference IJD )LW 4W4. wXTTt, T#- W, toPW 1VW 6MIL "4 43 Give Standard Notes to the Design Engineer. Identify which Special Notes will apply, if any. pw*W4&v~ cr. pJ~ 04*J ~5G - . . 1 Road Plans 1. Road Classifications and Design Criteria. #1 #2 #3 #4 - Street Name lt1~OAP* at Classification hW4% Roadway Width, W 4046 Minimum right-of-way width see note ( l ) . _ ~ Min. Horiz. Curve w/ super Min. Horiz. Curve w/o super y.~. . . _ . . . . . . I~..F General Land Slope/Terrain . . ~.e,.~..~ Design Speed, mph ~ . _ _ . _ . . . . Curb Type & Clear Zone (see Sec. 3.15) Sidewalk required? (yes/no) Z S.sb Note (1) Additional right-of-way may be given by the Sponsor. Discussion: ~~(414 WWWA *94k MIDO 10 "E 4L"Pk&1-7"7W4 &A k3iv Sew ow S ~ 2. According to the Design Engineer, what is the maximum number of units which will have access from a single ro adwaY?What is the max allowed per Sec. 1.03? ~3~U0' tor along a Priricipal or- Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04), 3. Minimum intersectio cingAis{ and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street. What spacing is provided for this project? 4. Are any off-site slope easements needed, or off-site right-of-way acquisition needed? If so, I desc ibe. &f .4,v1,uxo g;O-Of I . , \ 5. What type of turn-arounds are needed? (i.e. cul-de-sac, hammerhead, etc.) Street Name Turn-around Type Location C.AL- 6- 450iC Fe(t~ D~~ ~ 6. Road Surfacing Requirements (Sec. 3.16)A4>4iaq- OYt a) What method in determining road surfacing re u' esign Engineer propose to use (i.e. A.ASHTO Design Method, R-valu County thickness table r other)? I b) Provide the Design Engt. a copy of theO(oil Sample Proceduresr'Design Report Format & CAlternate Pavement Design TaRe- Nt~ 7. Does the Engineer plan on applying for any Design Deviations? If so, briefly describe below. lrt~ ~ulkc~ ~,~s F~t. '~uc D S~ SsZ•1tot~5 d~0~ #lOTS F~* A~Gl.t55 Storm Drainage 1. Basin Map a) Did the Design Engineer bring to the meeting a basin map? ~ . If so, does the basin map show topography and sufficient information to be useful? ~ . b) Does the basin map depict any contributing off-site runoff flowing onto the property? 46 Does it appear to be correct? If not, explain. k1~ l~ ~ s~~ ~~ZS e7F 4W-S&M &lscwJ'ro ~0►~►11'~ c} Is a site visit needed to verify the basin limits? ISOf A'r Schedule for: . VA 1=ow 2. Is the site located within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? . What type of water quality treatment is proposed by the Design Engineer? Z~ 3. What subsurface investigations, if any, are needed with this project to make sure the proposed disposal process will function as planned. 4R~,le~s N&K; ' 6AW40A 4. Are there downstream conditions which will affect the design of drainage facilities. If so describe possible mitigative measures. W. 5. Is maintenance access provided to each `208' swale or drainage pond? If there is something unusual, what requirements were given to the Design Engr.? wlu Nw1476- 14e-er 0* w hVic-f, !Oc ?'0 2ok-u lrJ/~ STpCw: 6. What does the Developer/Engr. propose for providing for perpetual maintenance of the drainage facilities? Please briefly describe proposed mechanism, and what is needed to accomplish this. -A-OA ' ipwLuA WuAq - 1A&A4 7. Are Erosion Control Measures required with this project. If so, briefly describe applicable requirements. 4E5 &mlNu iac e-49Pj"l'lST ~N ~c/l~tsL'i~-S Note: Provide a copy of this completed documenr to the Design Engineer at the end of the pre- design meeting. . $rCM Pts`AO4 674ef,-71- ' 5wAtzs 4 ~6t-i evwT ' 9>r Ay- A%* "*awp~ R~~~ ~ ~ ~OVr ' ~.'-i.G456 NXUAke aM~ Ce~cs7~cr~J r.~4t~rtn~f.wJ4 s~vtcc8-s ~-4 ~u.c d~ IIJt~ /tS ~T GF d o►+d l/!-[. ~ t.~tT1 •N . INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Awnue, Suits 200 Spokane, WA (309)45888,0 Fax: (509)458-8844 TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DATE: MEirch_'t4. 1996;,; ATTENTION: Dave Berto I. P.E.C. PROJECT 17 PROJECT PE-1414 PRaJECT NaME: $ V RWALK 2ND ~ ADD1 1 Description: ❑ Xerox Prints D Copy of Letter ❑ * Original Drawing 0 Contract Documents 0 ■ Title Report ■ Declaration of Cov. ❑ No. Copies Descri ption 1 - t Plat Certificate Purpose ■ Information O Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Written Approval 0 Signature & Return ❑ Remarks Dave - Enclosed please find an up-dated Plat Certificate for the above referenced project. I am getting ready to have the mylar made. If you have any additional comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Than k you. M . ~~~~~~Fr.) Signed: - "'A? 1 J SPOKAN~ COU~~ , ; tNWNEER . ~ TR.ANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NORTH 7 2 O ARGONNE SPOKANE, WASHZNGTON 99212 Prepared for: Order No.: MW-196132M DEAN BUILDING CORP. Charge: $125.00 16720 N.E. 116TH ST. Tax: 10.00 REDMOND, WA 98052 Total: $135.00 cc: Inland Pacific Sngineering FOIIRTH REPORT P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E Effective Date: February 27, 1996, at 8:04 a.m. Certificate for filing Plat of : RIVERWALK SECOND A.DDITION In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit: That portion of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6 of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 23 of Plats, Pages 37 through 40; thence South 29059158" East along the Easterly boundary of said RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, a distance of 159.08 feet; thence North 6000010211 East, a distance of 269.96 feet; thence South 291159 58" East, a distance of 27.01 feet (Rec. 27.00 feet) ; thence North 68000158" East, a distance of 61.93 feet; thence North 75040158" East, a distance of 63.00 feet (Rec. 63.30 feet) ; thence North 890481 00" East, a distance of 331.53 feet; thence North 00012'00" West, a distance of 119.41 f eet (Rec. 119 . 34 feet thence North 0204110311 East, a distance of 60.08 feet; thence North 00012100" West, a distance of 119.94 feet (Rec. 120.00 feet); thence South 89°50'54" West, a distance of 76.76 feet; thence South 89048104" West, a distance of 160.00 feet; thence South 81017' S2" West, a distance of 141.92 feet; thence North 71051' S8" West, a distance of 75 . 52 feet; thence South 1800810211 West, a distance of 95.67 feet; thence South 40030115" West, a distance of 130.05 feet; thence South 60000102" West, a distance of 249.12 feet to the Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington Page 1 o f 3 1 Order No. MW-196132M VESTED IN: STANTON-SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel No. 55083.9010 AND 55083.9052. Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. 2. Liability to future charges by Spokane County for Storm Water service. 3. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19. 4. Covenant imposed by instrument recorded on May 20, 1994, under Recording No. 9405200420. 5. DECLAR.ATION OF COVENANT AND EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: Stanton Development Company, a Washington General Partnership, on its own behalf and as nominee for Stanton-Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership AND: Wel Co Group, Inc., a Washington Corporation, their heirs, successors and assigns PURPOSE: Ingress and egress and utilities AREA AFFECTED : Portion of Govt. Lots 5 and 6 in Sec. 8, Twn. 25 N., R. 45 EWM RECORDED: May 15, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9505150112 This Declaration of Covenant & Easement ("Easement") shall terminate automatically, with respect to any portion of the easement area dedicated to the public, at the time of such dedication. I 6. VOLUNTARY MITIGATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: July 24, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9507240089 FOR MITIGATING SCHOOL IMPACT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIABILITY FOR SAID MITIGATZON IN THE AMOUNT OF $750.00 FOR EACH NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT. Page 2 of 3 Order No. MW-196132M 7. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for River Walk imposed by instrument recorded on July 25, 1995, under Recording No. 9507250312, including, but not limited to, liability for assessments levied by the community associatian, and rights or benefits which may be disclosed affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 8. TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DR.AINAGE EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND C4NDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Spokane County PURPOSE: Allowing natural drainage and/or runoff AREA AFFECTED: Portion af SW1/4 of Sec. 8, Twn. 25 N., R. 45 EWM RECORDED: July 28, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9507280291 This Easement will terminate at such time the described areas are platted. 9. DEED OF TRUST, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTIIRE FILING WITH ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Stanton-Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership TRUSTEE: Rainier Credit Company BENEFICIARY: Seattle-First National Bank, a National Banking Association ORIGINAL AMOLTNT: $2,047,040.00 DATED: September 29, 1995 RECORDED: October 10, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9510100081 AREA AFFECTS: Affects this and other property Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. 10. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458-2538. In order to make payment, account number is necessary. END OF EXCEPTIONS ENCLOSURE ( S ) : Sketch TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY . BY For ervice on this order call: (509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519 Maureen Wi1d, Title Off icer sac Page 3 of 3 - • • TRAN,^-,,'sMFniCA i-iTt.E fiNSURLINCE COMPAPlY 'fhi^ skercli is prr. :•i~pd. witho►t ch. r5s, fcr your ir.jnrma:iors. it is nnt ;mr.rdrd to shonr all mattnrs -pfnted to the prcL,^r!Y ir.cfud;n~, but Ro: l:ni:ed +n, 3rA.1, dimertn'.o^S, eas°mr:nE_ =nCro2Chmer,t3. or 3r,c^ric-n cf toLnd^r.is. t! +s nCt a=ri of, nor does ~-~';r~, trs cam:::itm ant cr p-;licy LQ v4l';ch it is ; r•~~tic~ Tl:p Carr:,.^ny Ll,^ 2VT! ior Z.1y "^t r^lvsd ta ihi; sScPtCh. FAfm@nCe ShOiIIQ bE? ~+^r~ to an ac^ljr,t- cur.rey for furt`;ar inform3tion. ~ r I PMM 2-e ►OACQ 2-A ~y . ~ ~ M11ClL S ~ vAwca • ~ ~ , ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ G ' ~ t rN+cn s rt1 ; - ~ rwectL 3 CA ~ , ~ ; { . , , , , . ► . I , , f ~ ~ ' ~ Al~ . 4.- S P O K A. N E ~ C O U N T Y DIVISIDN OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVI510N OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director December 13, 1995 Bruce Howard Inland Pacific Engineering Co. 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 SUBJECT: /p1414A - Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition Request for Final Inspection Gentlemen: I have reviewed your request for a Final Inspection, dated 11 Dec 95. In order to conduct this inspection, the Construction Engineer will need to provide the following: 1. Certification that the Construction Engineer has inspected the work, and that the improvements noted on the accepted plans were constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications; and 2. A red-lined plan set indicating the As-Constructed condition of the improvements, bearing the certification noted in Section 9.10 of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These requirements are in keeping with the process standards that you and your client requested to govern this project. I would like to remind you that all work on this project must meet the minimum requirements noted in the plans and specifications. In my letter of 24 Oct 95, I brought to your attention these items: a. The curb on the south side of Indiana appeared not to have been adequately protected from the weather, based on the pockmarked condition of the surface; and b. The gutter portion of the Type "B" curb was found to be only 51h inches thick, instead of the 6" thickness required in the Standards for design and construction governing this project (the 1981 edition of the Spokane County Road Standards). ~ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 4 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 0 (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-316b . P1414A - Riverwalk P.U.D. 211d Additioii Request for Final Inspection December 13, 1995 Page 2 of 2 Please provide evidence that these, and other items which the County has brought to your attention, are resolved prior to requesting a Final Inspection on this project. You should submit all records and reports, test results, etc., which verify that the proper inspections were performed as required in the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Constructlon. If you should have questions in this matter, please eontact Scott Egger, P. E., or Terry Lightfoot, either by letter, or by telephone at 456-3600. Sincerely, . i William A. Johns, P. E. Spokane County Engineer cc: Project file Spolcane County Engineer: Scott Egger, Terry Ligtitfoot ~ J SPOKANE VALLEY F1RE DEPARI'MElVT Spokane County FIre P'rotectlon Districf No. l ~ I0314 Mi SPS2AC'~11E AV£. •SPtJKAtsE, WA 992W3876 9 (504) 92$-1 T00 • FAX (509) 927 -2227 R. Pat Numtphctoi Chiet October 5, 1995 I,QUig Webster Department of Building and Planntnq 1026 West HroaflWay Aventie 3pokane, WA 99260 RE: RSvarwalk 2nd Addition Finai Plat PE-1414--81 Dear Mr. webster, OA 610v~ ThQ Spokane Yaiiey Fir Department will require that the road naaes of saimon ver Lane ar,d Snake Rivor Lane be changed to meet exist ng road namQC for thos hundred blocks. We havQ apprcived a water plan for this plat. ~ F c+~ss appeaFS ddequate. Sincer y, ~ n i 1 leY' ' Fire Inspector KHlad /Z- pOe-.lt" brsMtax transmiaaJ mg=7b-n . o1p.o.*► TM from `u to. '24 16 F~s• ~~/~jfU Ffai 47 7 ~ / Memorandum ~ Date: October 31, 1995 To: File From: Bill Johns, P.E., Acting Co nt Engineer Subject: P1414A - Rivervalk 2nd Additioa ~ 1. Ed Parry (Development Services Section) Met with Bruce Howard and Todd Whipple of IPEC on 30 Oct 95 to review IPEC' s responses to the County's 27 Oct.95 review comments. 2. Based on the brief level of evaluation of IPEC' s responses at this meeting, IPEC appears to have addressed the County's comments; a more in-depth review has not yet been conducted, but will be accomplished prior to the joint acceptance inspection for the facilities to be constructed under this project. Todd Whipple, the project engineer, suggested that the Developer and IPEC would ensure that any "fatal flaws" that the County discovers in the plans would be corrected in the f ield prior to the j oint acceptance inspection, in return for the accelerated acceptance of the project plans. 3. In the County's meeting on 25 Oct 95 with the Developer and IPEC, the Developer was informed that the final plat for this project would not be approved until the County accepts the construction of Indiana and establishes Indiana for maintenance. 4. Based on (1) Whipple' s of f er, (2) that I PEC appears to at least have the maj or drainage issues resolved, and (3) the assurance that the public roads, and drainage facilities receiving runoff from the public roads will be constructed prior to final plat approval, the plans for this phase may be accepted prior to the conduct of a "fatal flaw" review. ~ ♦ RECEiPT Dote 19 Q~ 2252 1 ' Received From ST~}N~~ S 0 hgd-- x- f Address /(02;20 AZC5 l~~ ~ P.41.4 C/~' Dollars For ~ Al ACCOUNT HOW PAID MAt.OF ~ C~ I ACCOUNT AMT, tAID C?1EOC ~ , Mo ~ o a By , . ~ - - - , . SKSO8 r1fiENR)W gTANTON SPOKANE L P. 001429 DATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION Y INVOICE AMOUNT Y DEDUCTION ~ BALANCE 9-6-95 Spokane County Engineer ( Plat Check Fee, Division 2 100.00 I CHECK 9-6-95 NUMBER 1429 100.00 PLFASE OETACH TMIS PORT►Oro JwD RETAIN fOR YOUR RECOfiUS \ STANTON SPOKANE L. P. KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON 19-57~1250 001429 16720 NE 116TH ST. (206) 869-6618 Bel{ewe on Fourth REDMOND, WA 98052 10655 NE. 4th S't. eeilewe, WA 98004 ' PAY: ****One Hundred Do llars and no/100"0%f%4% ~ ^ ^ pqTE CHECK NO. AMOUNT I 9-6-95 1429 $100.00 PAY TOTME Spokane County Engineer ORDER OF ~ / ii'00 L42 9ii' i: L 2 5000 5? 41: 226 5 3 5 5 5il' ✓ f . i . \ RECEIPT Date 9`-' /a 19 Q,~ 225~ Received From -S7/9Al7`O/1) SpQ h;9-6r- #4 - Pr Address Doilars $ For Iti L4" ACCOUNT HOW PAID ,,MT.Of 1 I ~ . ACCOUNI MAT. *AID C71EClC C' iAIAMa MONEY BY DUE OROER . " . ~ SKi08 IIMF~1 STANTQN SPOKANE L P. 001429 ~ DATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION Y INVOICE AMOUNT DEDUCTION ~ BALANCE 1 , 9-b-95 Spokane County Engineer Plat Check Fee, Division 2 100.00 I CHECK I 9-6-95 NUMBER 1429 ~ 100.00 PLEASE DET7►GM THIS PORTION ANO AEtiuN fOR rOUR RECORDS STANTON SPOKANE L. P. KEY BANK OF WASHINGTON 19-57~1250 001429 16720 NE 116TH ST. (206) 869-6618 Bellevue on Fourth REDMOND, WA 98052 10655 NE 4th Si. Bellewe, WA 98404 . „ „ „ . PAY: ****One Hundred Dollars and DATE CHECK NO. AMOUNT 9-6-95 1429 $100.00 PAY TOTME Spokane County Engineer OROER OF r 11800 L42 90 i: L 2 50O0 5 7 41: ' 2 6 5 3 5 5 5il• , . . , . , . - • . \ I RECEIPT Date 90-' la 19 Q~ 2252 Received From ~S~Ti9N7~?/t1 Sp0 h,&r- Address Aro 290 ~ ~~G 7A CY, rlsl~~Co Doilars $ For ~ Al ACCOUNT HOW PAID AAAT.OF ~ y ~H ACCOtJNT AAAT. PAlD CHEC!( ~ uuNCE MONEY gy , I DUE - ORDfR . iKS08 f53M;0W - . - - ~ ~ SfANTON SPOKANE L P. 001429 OATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION V INVOICE AMOUNT Y OEDUCTION ~ BALANCE , 9-6-95 Spokane County Engineer Plat Check Fee, Division 2 100.00 CHECK ' 9_6-95 NUMBER 1429 ~ 100•00 PLEASE DETACH TNIS POR'T10N AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECOROS \ STANTON SPOKANE L. P. KEr Bar,K oF wnsHINGTON 19-5711250 001429 16724 NE 116TH ST. (206) 869-6618 Bellewe on Fourth REDMOND, WA 98052 10655 NE. 4th St. Bellevue, WA 98004 „ . . . . . „ . PAY: ***~One Hundred Dollars and no/100 DATE CHECK NO. AMOUNT 9-6-95 1429 $100.00 PAY T°TME Spokane County Engineer ORDER ~ OF ~ ' - ~ / ii'00 L 4 2 911' 1: L 2 5000 5 7 4l: 2 2 6 5 3 5 5 5II' ~ . _ . ~ V TC) s ~ ?SG;7 it.4 s t~s W157 a%'`"~ vs „ ~t'~,~,~R- ~'~►s ~ ~ ' ~ & L"L" wE7 ~ tu/ ~c ~ ~ _ Th &4*y ~ ~ ~~o v-, ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. September 12, 1995 Mr. Dave Berto Spokane County Engineer's Office North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION PE-1414-81 Dear Dave: Enclosed please find two copies of the draft final plat referenced above. Please review for final approval. The enclosed check for $100 is the plat check fee. Enclosed also is a copy of the plat certif icate. A signed Fee Agreement was submitted when the Sewer and Street Plans were submitted. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. G~GZv Bi fe J. Sparli q BJS/bi s Enc. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509-458-6840 FAX: 509-458-6844 ~ S P O K A N E _ , , C O U N 'I' Y OFFlCE OF THE COUMY ENGINEER • A DIV[SION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ranald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director February 15, 1995 Edward Dean Stanton Spokane L. P. 16720 N. E. 116th Redmond, WA 98052 M ichael Hunt, P. E. North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 SUBJECT: ✓P1414A - Riverwalk, Second Addition 01414B - Riverwalk, Third Addition Traffic Impact Analysis I Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that plan review of these phases will not be started until (a) the portion of the project north of Indiana Avenue receives Final P. U. D. approval from the Spokane County Planning Department (Phase 2); and (b) the traffic impact analysis required for each phase is completed, i.e., existing conditions surveyed, impact due to this development projected, mitigating measures resolved, and any necessary construction by the Developer completed (or the necessary sureties posted with WSDOT). I note that you provided the lst submittal of road and drainage plans for Riverwalk Second Addition (P1414A) on 12 December 94, and for Riverwalk Third Addition (P1414B) on 8 Feb 95. I also note that you have not yet submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis for either of these phases. I would like to draw your attention to the following Conditions of Approval for this project: l. March 1982, Engineer Condition #24: A traffic analysis of each phase will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with the State of Washington Department of Transportation.. . " 2. August 5, 1993 Time Extension a. Division of Engineering & Roads (Updated), Conditions " 1. All previously impose conditions are still applicable. " "4. Prior to anv_ plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned analysis shall be com leted." Tb26 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, ~OA 99260-0170 •(50w456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 - J r P1414A - Riverwalk 211d Addition P1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Traffic Impact Analysis; Plat Checking February 15, 1995 Page 2 of 3 As you will recall, the review comments for the second submittal of Phase l of this project were completed in June 1994, but held pending completion of the traffic analysis and coordination of the same with VWSDOT. The review comments were not released until the County had received some assurances from your representative (at our meeting on 26 Ju1y 1994) that the traffic anatysis would be performed and mitigating measures resolved with WSDOT. As a result of that Ju1y 1994 meeting, we also understood that the required traffic impact analyses would be completed in a timely fashion for any future phases of this project. To date, the mitigating measures for Phase 1 have been resolved and designed; apparently either construction or payment to WSDOT by the Developer, or posting of adequate surety by the Developer, remains to be completed. Since the identification and resolution of traffic impacts is key to approval of any plat phasing on this project, 1 have no clloice but to inform you that there wiil be no plat checking of Phase 2, Phase 3, or any other future phase of this project, unless and until all relevant land use actions are campleted , and the required traffic analysis is completed. Mr. Jim Legat, P.E., the Acting Utilities Director, informs me that the County Utilities Department will continue to check plans submitted to them, but there will be no plan approvals issued until these matters are resolved. In addition, there will be no approach permits or utility construction permits issued for these future phases until the traffic analysis is completed and the road and drainage plans approved. This decision is based on the reasoning that because (1) there are pending land use actions which will likety affect the road layout, and (2) there are Conditions of Approval which must be completed prior to any plat cilecking (and which may also affect the facilities to be eonstructed as part of the phase in question), a review of any plans submitted prior to completion of these key activities in the plan approvai process would not be an effective use of our plan Ceviewers' time. The effective use of our staff time is particularly important in light of the number of submitted plans for projects which have completed land use actions and met other Conditions of Approval. When the pending land use actions for Phase 2, as well as the traffic irnpact analysis for Phase 2 and Phase 3 are completed, the respective plans submitted for these phases will be reviewed. If you so desire, we can return these recent submittals to you, pending any revisions which may be necessary following the completion of the pending land use actions and traffic impact anaIyses; please call to let us know if the plan submittals should be retur»ed to you. ~ I ~ P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition P1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition Traffic Impact Analysis; Plat Checking Feb ruary 15, 1995 Page 3 of 3 Please be advised also that the road and drainage plans for Phase 1 will not be approved until all actions required by WSDOT for the mitigating me,asures required under Phase 1 have been completed, e.g., Developer's Agreements, posting of surety, etc.,. If you have any questions about this decision, please contact me at (509)456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer EJP/EJP cc: Spokane County: Public Works Director - Dennis Scott, P.E. Engineer's Office - Gary Kennaly, P.E. Bill Hemmings, P.E. Utilities Department - Jim Legat, P.E. Planning Department - Wally Hubbard Jon Peterson John Nunnery Prosecutor's Office - Ron Arkills Washington State Department of Transportation, Region 6- Greg Figg project file reviewer 1 , a . • 1 40' ~ PROPOSED TEMPORARY tURNAROUND ~ i I ~ , : , . ~ , . ~ TEMPORARY ~ _ _ ~ TURN-AROUNO EASEMENT ~ E. ~ \ , ' , _ f - a- - ~ .j- - / , • _ I i . _ . ; ~ . . . ~ 1 1 A .7 I 10' UTILITY I ~ . , ~ EASEMENT ~ I (TYPiCAL) ' I I J ' ` ' . . . I . . . . ~ . -V~i,. . " ~ INLAND . TEMPORARY TURNAROUND PAcIFIc . RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION ENQINEERINQ 707 1Neet 1th - Sufte 200 (5W) 458-ee40 ~ 9,/26~95 J~SP°k0^o, MfA 00204 FAX: (309) 458-N44 . .1 FAX COVER SHEET Spokane County Cngineer's Office -1'hird Floor rax # 324-3478 1026 W 13ROADWAY SPOK/1Nr, WA 99260 - 1'IiONL #(SU9) 456-3600 DATE: FAX TO. COMPANY: C1TY / STA'I'E: NUMBER 4F PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEE`I): . FROM. G, / v MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: , • ..1 ~ ~ ~ S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Acting County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director October 31, 1995 Todd Whipple, P. E. IPEC SUBJECT: 11149' Riverwalk 2nd Addition mittal Accepted Gentlemen: We have conducted a general evaluation of your recent submittal for this project, and we find that this submittal appears to meet the minimum standards of the Spokane Countv Standardsfor Road and Sewer Construction ("SCRS We are, therefore, able to accept your approval of the plans and calculations for this project. I am enclosing a sepia print of your approved road and drainage plans for this project: the originals are on file at the Public Works Department. A copy of your approved drainage calculations is also enclose ~~ordance with Section 5.02.D of the SCRS, this acceptance valid until Uctober 30, . f~ie facilities are not constructed, You maY re9uest an extension of the acceptance for an additional two years; the plans shall be revised to reflect current standards prior to granting the extension. Please note: 1. The County's acceptance of this submittal does not relieve the sponsor or his agents from any liability related to portions of the design that are not in conformance with the SCRS, or which do not follow good engineering practice; 2. All permits and notifications necessary prior to construction are the responsibility of the project Sponsor and/or his assigned agents; and 3. The County will not accept the improvements to be constructed under this project until (a) all construction documentation and certified Record Drawings have been submitted and accepted; and (b) all construction deficiencies noted in the County's Acceptance Inspection have been conected. . 4. Per our meeting on October 25, 1995, surety for the construction of the improvements indicated on the project plans will not be accepted. The Final Plat will not be approved by the County Engineer's Office until -such time as these improvements have been accepted by the County Engineer's Office. Record Drawings and Construction Documents must be submitted to the County En ineer's Office, and accepted by the Countv ~7rior to the )oint Acceptance I11SPeCLQ6Il~~'"6i~v~.le •ti , 9 260ructio ~76n•(509) 456-3600 FAX: (~~9)324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3165 ~i~~crs~. P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Submittal Accepted October 31, 1995 Page 2 of 2 5. Per our October 30, 1995 meeting, a"fatal flaw" check of the plans and calculations has not yet been accomplished. The County will conduct a"fatal flaw" check and advise you of the results. As you agreed at this meeting, any "fatal flaws" uncovered by our check will be corrected prior to the County's acceptance of the improvements indicated on the project plans. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer ~&Zd Edward J. ~ie, r P.E. Plan Review Engineer encls: Plans (1 sheet) - sepia Drainage Calculations cc: project file Pat Harper Dave Berto Permit Technician - Sylvia Lightfoot reviewer Project Sponsor: Dean Housley Company (Veme Jacobsen) V J k- F~C .*.a~...p1~~.. , , ~~•ti . ~ . ' " 'iL.riu~~ YiiflJfi~v!~~ - l..r ~ . .r~.. rr... n~l«p ~ , • ~ • • . o~ . , ,r^y . . . .e . ~ . ' . FAX COVEX' SHEET ' Spokane County Engineer's Office - Third Flovr rax 11324-3478 1026 w 13ROnDwnY SPOKnivE, wn 99260 -PHON r#(509) 456-3600 DATE: rAX ~ -ro: COMPANY: ~►~.{~~-~V Co. ~ . CITY / STATL: ~ ~ . NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 ~ FROM: ED ti MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: ' _kg ?WnL4A#- uZwetw Ih.IG zd. '1[q4 mu 4,44 '~o ZPeL Q- ~l40 . , ~ ~u,~,~fa~c. ~2..S~I~.~-u►~~?~ 74 ('L7#vj-;'rr.~. ~ 1135 a,4,.- 0 ' F~~X COVER SHEET I ~ SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1026 W. Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 Phone: (509) 456-3600 . First Floor Fax # (509) 324-7655 DATE: 31 or.T~CS FAX TO: COMPANY: **J~ 170-0 ubf,c40 cZ CITY/STATE: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): ° FROM: ~ PAW MESSAGE: t9-= V►4-l+a Aic'knoy FilR- Pv-~ ( 1 ` FAX-COVER SHEET SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1026 W. Broadway Avenue; Spokane, WA 99260 Phone: (509) 456-3600 First Floor Fax # (509) 324-7655 DATE: 31 W---js FAX # 4% To: &2OW : coWarY: ~ CITY/STATE: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): 3 FROM: eD , . MESSAGE: ~ gj~~ 7 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. October 10, 1995 W.O. No. 95527, 95617 and 95618 Spokane County Department of Public Works . 1026 W. Broadway Avenue kn A Spo a e, W 99260 Attn: Pat Harper Re: - , , , ~ - , Dear Pat: As you,are aware Inland Pacific Engineering. Co.. is currently working on.three separate Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) all within the same general geographic vicinity. These three analyses are Morningside Heights, Turtle Creek and.Meadowview Tenace. As part of these EIS efforts, we have prepared a traffic analysis document titled the "Barker Road Corridor Study". This analysis attempts to not only quantify the impacts and mitigating measures from these developments but also includes the Riverwalk and other developments to the north. As of yet the EIS's being prepared have not been issued to the public or the reviewing agencies for review and comment. As you are also aware we submitted, in June of 1995, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) related directly to the Riverwalk PUD. This analysis was comprehensive in nature and only took into account the Turtle Creek development as background traffic. However, it should be reminded that Riverwalk is the ONLY approved plat (PUD) within this general geographic area. Therefore, for final platting purposes, and the release of plats, the Riverwalk TIA should suffice as a stand alone document when approving any final . plats for this development. At this time both the County and WSDOT have reviewed this document. The only outstanding comments which could impact the study delivered, is a WSDOT comment relating to the Turtle Creek traffic being used as background traffic. Without the Turtle Creek traffic, the: threshold for mitigation would move past the proposed 260th lot as identified in the document. At this -time, we have not revised the Riverwalk TIA due to the pending release of the Barker Road study, but there is no reason that the approval of approximately 35 to 40 lots should be held up by IPEC or Ramm Associates not issuing the draft copies of tbe Barker Road-stud*-when-tbe Riverwalk TIA study can be used as a stand alone document. R E C E ~t, n, 707 West 7th • Suite zoo OCT 1 11995 Spokane, Washington 99204 ~ i 509-458-6840 ~~3~~~ ~~v~iNsF l~ ' FAX: 509-458-6844 • Spokane County October 10, 1995 Page 2 Please call with any questions as we will need to get Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd approved when they are ready. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Inc. I Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW/tw attachments cc: WSDOT, Leonard Cash file T Fax 77AL)PPLE 4-73 auce ,f? Washington State Department of T1 ansportation Sid Morison Secretary of Transportation Mr. Louis Webster Spokane County Planning Department W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Dear Mr. Webster: October 4, 1995 Eastern Region 2714 N. Mayfair Street Spokane, WA gs207.2090 (509) 324-6000f'S' (y )I Re: Riverwalk Phase II OCT_ 61995 f, We have received the applicants request for approval of the final plat for Phase II of the project. In response to this we have requested a copy py of the traffic analysis, Barker Road TIA & Corridor Study, that was conducted for Phase II of this development as required by the conditions of approval for this development. We inquired with both Inland Pacific Engineering and Ramm and Associates for a copy of the above traffic analysis. Both Inland Pacific Engineering and Ramm and Associates declined to provide us a copy of this analysis at this time. Instead we were asked to obtain a copy of this draft report from the County. To date we have not received a copy of this analysis as required by the conditions of approval for our review and approval. Until we are assured that the traffic impacts of this development have been adequately addressed in the needed traffic study we cannot support the approval of Phase II of this development- We would ask that a copy of the applicants traffic analysis be provided to us for our review and approval. If you should have any questions on this matter please feel free to contact me or Greg Figg in our Planning department at 324-6199. Sincerely, LEONARD C. CASH, PE Regional Planning Engineer JCL LCC/gf cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Edward Dean, Stanton Spokane Limited Partnership Memorandum . Date: February 14, 1995 . To: Spokane County Utilities Department (Jim Legat, P.E.) -2 From: Development Engineering Services (Ed Parry, P.E. ~ Subj ect :/P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd AdditionA P1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition 1. This will conf irm the agreement reached at our meeting today. 2. Given the status of the Final P. U. D. approval f or the northerly portion of this project site (Phases 2 and 5), and that the requirement for completion of a traffic impact analysis for each phase of this proj ect prior to any plat checking, I understand that the Utilities Department will not issue any plan approvals for utilities under their jurisdiction until land use actions and traf f ic impact analyses af f ecting the various phases are completed. This suspension may be communicated to the Developer in the County Engineer's letter to the Developer on this subject. 3. If this does not reflect your understanding of the results of our meeting, please let me know immediately, so that we may modify our letter to the Developer accordingly. If this does reflect your understanding of the results of our meeting, please initial the right-hand margin along paragraph 2. , ~ ■ ~ - \ S'1'^ nlY • ' ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. May 7, 1996 I.P.E. W.O. #95617 ~ ~~~~~~~D MAY Q $ 1996 Dean-Housley Building Corporation 16720 N.E. 116th Street SpOKANE-COUNTti' ENG1NEER, y . , . Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mr. Verne Jacobsen, Superintendent SUBJECT: Construction Deficiency List Riverwalk 2nd Addition Spokane County, Washington Dear Verne: This letter transmits a list of constructed items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non-conformance with approved project plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to preparation of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and approval of the construction by the County Engineer's office. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on 6 May 1996, and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This letter is an addendum to our April 12, 1996 letter regarding deficiencies in Riverwalk 2nd Addition construction. DRAINAGE PONDS The five stormwater retention/disposal ponds (A,B,C,E,F3) have several non- conforming items in common: NOT TO PLAN DIMENSIONS Pond bottom dimensions generally measured less than plan dimensions, resulting in pond bottom areas less than design, and decreased pond stormwater storage volumes. Pond "E" appeared to extend outside the established drainage easement. NOT TO PLAN GRADES Pond bottoms were not flat, curb flow line to top-of-grate and bottom-of-pond to top- of-grate elevation differences were not per plan, downstream ends of curb inlets were not at bottom-of-pond elevations, pond sideslope inclinations not per plan. NO IRRIGATION OR VEGETATION Pond irrigation systems had not been installed, and pond sodding or topsoil application and hydroseeding had not been accomplished at the time of our visit. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 l Riverwalk 2nd Addition Deficiency List #2 Page 2 of 3 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES Drywells and catch basins generally need to be cleaned of all foreign material prior to final inspection by the County. Other specific comments include: ► Downstream end of curb inlets in Ponds "C" and "E" have been undermined. ► Pipe improperly'grouted (fist sized rocks pushed inio grout) into the dryweli adjacent to Pond "E". ► Drywells under the sidewalk adjacent to Pond "B" are not adequately grouted where the 12" CPE pipes enter the barrels. Rocks have been incorporated into the grout fillets, and gaps have been left in the grout, where filter fabric and sandy backfill soils are intruding into the drywell barrels. ► Drywells adjacent to Ponds "A" and "C" have not been grouted around the 12" CMP's carrying water from the inlet structures in the subject ponds. ADDITIONAL ITEMS ► Back edges of sidewalks should be backfilled to provide continuous subgrade support and preclude undermining. ► Temporary cutoff swales should be constructed as shown in the plans to keep sediment laden stormwater from running into the street. ► Concrete patches over spalled areas of concrete curbing and sidewalk along Indiana Avenue have crackPd, presenting a non-conforming finish, and likely a short-lived repair. . ► Areas along Indiana Avenue where curb drops were constructed subsequent to AC paving support smears of gutter concrete on the asphalt pavement, resulting in a non-conforming finish. ► Streets, curbs and sidewalks must be cleaned of soil and other debris. ► Raindrop impressions on concrete curbing along the south side of Indiana Avenue, east of Salmon River Lane, have not yet been corrected to County Standards. : . ~ Riverwalk 2nd Addition Deficiency List #2 Page 3 of 3 This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved/are approvable under current County Standards. Our preparation of this letter in no way releases the contractor from his responsibility for constructing the improvements per approved project plans and specifications, and applicable sections of the current Spokane County Standards. By a copy of this letter, we are notifying the Coun#y Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the above issues. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. Respectfully Submitted, INLAND PACIFIC NGINEERING e"E. J eterson, P. E. Project Engineer cc: Bill John P= Jim adke Terry Lightfoot Ed Dean a.1956171defclst2.wp1 ~ FAX COVER SHEET - ~ Spokane Counly I;ngiiieer's Office - 7'liirci l'loor rax H 324-3478 - ~ 1026 W I.1110AUWAY Sl'UKA.NI:, WA 99260 - 1'1 [ONL # (509) 456-3600 DATE: ~i 6 rAX -ro : COMPANY: TpEr, ~ Cl'I,Y / STArI'L: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEE'I): rRVM: MFSSf1,GE /SPECIAL INSrI,RUCTION: X! Zkve,(Lw&4(_ 7~cm) t2o. a5A~- AGk- - co P(.ZA5E ~~'VZ &sv r)4x D To FAX COVER SHEET 1%41 ;Spokane County Engiueer's OCf:ice -'Third rloor Fax # 324-3478 6 a 1026 W 13R0/\I)W/\Y S1'OKANI-, WA 99260 - PIIONL #(509) 456-3600 ~ DATE: 2 FA.x ~Z 1- 5S I~ 1 O: COMPANY: t GITY / STATC: . NUMI3ER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVLR SHEET): Z rRUM: -ch W~ . r MrSSAGE /SPECI/1.L INSTRUCTION: P~= ~t ?.et 72) JAY, I ; _ AAp ; S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director February 29, 1996 Todd Whipple, P.E. IPEC SUBJECT: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Record Drawings - Submittal Not Accepted at This Tune Gentlemen: . We have conducted a cursory review of your recent submittal for this project, and we have found items which do not appear to meet the minimum standards of the Sookane Countv Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. We are, therefore, unable to accept your submittal at this time. Of particular concern is the wording of the certification statement, which does meet that shown in section 9.10 of the Standards. The words "or my agent" and "periodically" are not included in certification statement shown in the Standards. We are in the process of reviewing the construction reports for this project, to ensure that the reports indicate that all the construction meets the specification requirements. We will be providing comments on the construction reports under separate cover. Please make the necessary revisions. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Ed Parry at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. . Acting Spokane County Engineer v4rd , P.C. William H. emmings, P. E. Development Services Manager encls: Record Drawings (1 set - Mylar) cc: project file Spokane County Engineer's Office: Bill Johns, P.E., Jim Radke, P.E. reviewer 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 0 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 0 (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL ~ 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 To: ~be'wc DATE: PROJECT ATTENTION: PROJECT NAME: ~ • ~ r • ~aw~~h• ~ ~ . , . Descriptioti ' _ . r FE6 N~ Blueline Prints N~ Copy of Letter M biriginal Drawing MI Contract Documents.:''- Ujjjj4'►~ E.'iGiN, EER M ~ Work Authorization M ~ Report . . , No.. Copies ~ Description , , PL1I'pOSe MI Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request ML-I'~Vritten Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks ~ '7T~T~ .-i-IC:7 t-.6cA e7'i9✓Z-577 A7,J Y Qm tf!=; i p1~~ cA-t.C" Signed: ~ . ( ! - . ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECEIVED March 8, 1996 MAR W.0. No. 95527, 95617 and 95618 1 1 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County - Department of Public Works 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Bill Hemmings, P. E. Re: Riverwalk 2nd and 3rd Additions p T 1 A'% A ~+1 L' -1414-01 Dear Bill: Per our phone conversation yesterday, enclosed are the two wordings that we intend to put on our street and storm record drawings. 1. Standard Spokane County Wording I have reviewed the construction and to my knowledge find it to be in substantial conformance with the approved certified plans and standard specifications except as noted. 2. Additional IPEC Wording Please note that the following wording will be highlighted with a bubble as shown. 1,- The wording "I have reviewed " for these record drawings is intended to imply that the construction was either reviewed/inspected directly by the.me engineer or was done under his direction by IPEC staff or it's agents. ~'~T'i F' N~ Bill, i realize that tius is splitting nairs, but aciaing inis wor ing wouid maicC mE ieei a ioi 'oettzr. Please review and share with Bill Johns if you need to. hanks for your time on this issue. Sincerely, gineering Co., Inc. Z&d Pacif ~ 311•Q~6 ~6 . Todd R. Whipple, E. A tM TRW/tw ' ' . ~(w ~'4/iS'e. Tn wa cc: file 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 , p4M-Ar ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, IE"C'E IV'E D May 22, 1996 ~ I. P. E. W.O. #95617 MN 28 1996 SPOKAiVE COUAITY ENGINEER . Dean-Housley Building Corporation 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mr. Verne Jacobsen, Superintendent SUBJECT: Construction Deficiency List #4 Riverwalk 2nd Addition Spokane County, liVashington Dear Verne: This letter transmits a list of constructed items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non-conformance with approved project plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to submission of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and approval of the construction by the County Engineer's office. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on May 21, 1996, and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This letter is an addendum to our April 12, May 7 and May 14, 1996 letters regarding deficiencies in Riverwalk 2nd Addition construction. DRAINAGE PONDS The five stormwater retention/disposal ponds (A,B,C,E,F3) have two non-conforming items in common: * Drainage structures need to be cleaned of all foreign material. ~ Some topsoil, no landscaping (sod or hydroseed) or irrigation installed. POND B * Pipe from inlet structure in pond to dryell under sidewa is not at design grade. This pipe as installed is flat. * d"', civol, . A" Pond bottom is not flat. /k A~~ x. P Aw ~ Z ~ 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 9 FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 t Rivenrvalk 2nd Addition Deficiency List #4 Page2of3 POND C * Slope from wheelchair ramp to pond bottom not to design grade (steeper than 3:1 shown on plans). POND E * Slope from wheelchair ramp to pond bottom too steep (3:1 shown on plans). POND F3 * Slope from wheelchair ramp to pond bottom too steep (3:1 shown on plans). ADDITIONAL ITEMS * Temporary cutoff swales should be constructed as shown in the plans to keep sediment laden stormwater from running into the street. * Areas along Indiana Avenue where curb drops were constructed subsequent to AC paving support smears of gutter concrete on the asphalt pavement, resulting in a non-conforming finish. * Backhoe tire marks on sidewalk and pavement must be removed. Riverwalk 2nd Addition Deficiency List #4 Page3of3 This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed - items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved/are approvable under current County Standards. Our preparation of this letter in no way releases the contractor from his responsibility for constructing the improvements per approved project plans and specifications, and applicable sections of the current Spokane County Standards. By a copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the above issues. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. Respectfully Submitted, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING Jer E. P terson, P. E. Pr ect Engineer cc: ill Johns, County Engineer, Spokane County Public Works ~ 7d P~~~ry, Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Jim Ra ke, Construction Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Terry Lightfoot, Chief Inspector, Spokane County Public Works Ed Dean, Dean Housley Company _ a:1956171de(c1st4.wpf S P O K~1 N E - C O U N T Y DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS ~ A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director June 3, 1996 Todd Whipple, P. E. IPEC (Vtk fp,c) SUBJECT: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Record Drawing Documentation Gentlemen: You recently posed some questions regarding documentation of the constructed project, and the finalization of the plat. We are providing these responses: Question #1: IPEC proposes to determine elevations at 100' center line station, curb returns, curb inlets, pipe inverts, and drywell grates. Are other locations needed ? Question #2: What is an acceptable difference frorrc the accepted plans before a "substantive" change occurs? Response: Elevations, locations, type of material, etc., should be verified for compliance to the accepted plans as construction proceeds. Elements which do not comply with the plans should be brought to the County Engineer's attention, accompanied by an analysis for impacts to such requirements as safety, drainage performance, maintainability, life-cycle performance, etc., for the County Engineer's concurrence. If there is no impact, then a"substantive" change probably does not occur, and re-approval of the plans is probably not needed. If there is an impact, then approval of a plan change is needed; the plans would then need to be re-approved by the Design Engineer, and re-accepted by the County Engineer. At this point in the project, a list of non-conforming elements should be tabulated, accompanied by an impact analysis. Where the County Engineer concurs that there is not an impact to the project, the as-constructed condition can be noted on the plans without processing a plan change. Where there are impacts to the project, then these could be addressed as a single plan change. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 9 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 0 (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324•3166 i' . . Todd Whipple, P.E. P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Record Drawing Documentation June 3, 1996 Page 2 of 2 Question #3: In order to finalize the plat, will the County Engineer accept a surety for the construction & repair of the landscaping/maintenance/irrigation system of the 208 swales ? This is proposed so that the Developer does not have to construct the swales once to get County acceptance for finalization, and then again to repair any damage from the home builders prior to actual establishment of the roads for maintenance by the County Question #4: In order to finalize the plat, will the County Engineer accept the construction of Indiana Avenue in this phase, prior to accepting the portion of Indiana constructed in phase 1, provided that the Developer posts a surety a bond for the maintenance & repair of this road until after the homebuilders are completed with the lots fronting on Indiana ? This is proposed so that any repairs necessary to allow the County to accept this portion of Indiana for maintenance could be assured. Response: As of today, there has been no change in the County Engineer's position that the public road and drainage facilities serving this project need to be constructed and inspected, and both the physical construction of the facilities, and the construction documentation of the facilities needs to be accepted by the County Engineer's Office prior to Final Plat Approval. There has been no determination as to what options, if any, would be acceptable to allow Final Plat Approval before the road and drainage facilities are completed. We trust this response answers your questions. If you have further questions in this matter, please contact Ed Parry at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, ~~`William A. n , P. E. Spokane County Engineer cc: project file reviewer Spokane County Public Works Director: Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane Counry Engineer's Office: Bill Hemmings, P.E.; Ed Parry, P.E. Jim Radke, P.E.; Terry Lightfoot Developer: Ed Dean, Dean Housely - Bellevue (via fax) Mark Hancock, Verne Jacobsen, Dean Housely - Spokane (via fax) ~l FAX COVER SHEE~ ~ ; Spokane County hL'~. FAX # (509) 324-3478 1026 W BROAbWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 - PHONE #(509) 456-3600 DATE: ~ JU0 q(p FAX q-~5g ~65W TO: ToDD vmt~~ COMPANY: CITY / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 FROM: YALC 7Tc"S45 ~~~t:~►.rc v MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: FAX COVER SHEEr---' ; ; Spokane County F~ # (509) 324-3478 ~ 1026 W BROAbWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 - PHONE #(509) 456-3600 DATE: FAX eE?f -L (a?.D TO: COMPANY: ~ B&'J4 C:v* CIT'Y / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEET): 3 FROM: yut Xvr~ MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCT'ION: ~T4_1+A 60H f-1w6o -rn fimo vAtc detf',~04~ ~~ct~r-.~r,► FAX COVER SHEE^ Spokane County Lj:,. FAX # (509) 324-3478 ' 1026'Vq BROAbWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 - PIIONE #(509) 456-3600 DATE: 4 `14i FA.X TO: (I~~ COMPANY: c'~ ~4~44 CITY / STATE: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEE'I): ~ FROM: YALk 1~romw-21 el V MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: f L 60 GC ~ - ~ Johns Bill ENG 9y r From: Parry Ed ENG To: Hemmi gs Bill ENG; Johns Bill ENG Subject: P1414~ - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Date: Thursday, May 30, 1996 3:38PM Todd Whipple noted that Indiana Avenue in this phase is nearly ready for our inspection. He had some questions about how the process should run from here. 1. When verifying the elevations, they propose to shoot: CL at even 100-foot stations, curb returns, curb drops, inverts of pipes, and drywell grates, in order to determine whether the project was built per plan. Is this adequate? They have ensured that the relative elevation differences between curb drop/drywell rim/pond floor are per plan? If they need more, where should the elevations be taken? 2. What is an acceptable difference from the plan elevation/location before a"substantive" change occurs? 3. In order to finalize the plat (and sell some lots), will the County Engineer accept a bond fpr pond landscaping/irrigation/maintenance/repair? They want to avoid doing this work twice (once when the County accepts it, and again after the homebuilders have been through things) ~ 4. Will the County accept the construction of Indiana (phase 2) prior to accepting Indiana (hase 1). Todd thought that _-6ounty w.ouEdn-'t-necessar\y have to establish the road for maintenance, f the Developer posted a(separate bond ror maintenance/re6ir-of the road until after the homebuilders are one with the O-j lots fronting-tndiaRa.-After-th'at-point-in time, any repairs--needed for the County to accept Jwnership of the ft,~r road would be made, and the warranty period would star,-, ~ Please let me know your thoughts on these items ~ ~C-k ~ c~ l ~ s' a,ve ~ ~ Gt~ e f ~ ~ S~cP c • ~ ~ . ~G~iL~.f - ~L re ~ C ~ J~ bol ~zk-?- ~1-6 'P ~ , ~ c Gv e G~~r ~ r te~ G~ Gsor.v E-' rJ G~✓7C~ ~ Y- . I Sd `ti' r ~~'P`~'`P ► ~~~y1 !~r►~ Pa e 1 I ~~,y~`~~ ~ GINEERING - TRANSMtTTAL INLAND t PAC t F I C E N 707 W. Tth Avenue, Suite 200 Spolcane, WA (509)458-6M Fax: (509)45S-68" . -ii:l••• • NTY ENGINEER . - T4: SPOKANE COU . . . ~ : ~ : ~~~g 56 i ry~~~~.~: ~9. . . ;.r•.~.~::.;~._~:.:..:::.' . EN N : Da . . TIO . . . rto . ve Be ~ k,'v:•.:; . . 11i~}: A .f. a`~(•/~ - '~~A •,•~•~~:~JNA~~~...•,~'•_'~~ 1 , ~:~RE. 4 -141 ECT PE PROJ =:~~it~1~~`.~~:- . .:~~xr Description: Prints C] Copy Qf Letter ■ Prooosec! Dedic.ation . CI Xerox D Original Drawing C] Contract Documents 0 p Report 0 Declaration of Cov. ❑ No. Copies Descri ption 1 Qoqy af Proposed Dpdication for final plat ~ Purpose Information ■ Review & Comments 0 Per Your Request 0 p Written Approvat 0 Signature & Return 0 Remarks Dave _ Enclosed please find a print out of the proposed dedication page for the above referenced final plat. Could you please review the wording and insure it meets with your approval. I will then put the dedication into my drawing. Thank you. Signed: _4 - DEC 0 51995 ~ • SpQs:vaE COUNTY ENGINE.ER ~ . DEDICATION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that STANTON - SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership, MORVEST GAPITAL CORPORATION, a . British Golumbia Corporation, TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, and SEP,TTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association, have caused to be platted into Lots, Blocks, Common Areas and Street the land shown hereon, to be known as RIVERWALK, SECOND ADDITION being a parcel of land in the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6, of Section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., in Spokane County, Washington described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plat recorded under Book 23 of Plats, Pages 37 thought 40; thence S.2905915811E. along the Easterly boundary of said RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION a distance of 159.08; thence N.6000010211E. a distance of 269.96 feet; thence S.29059'58"E. a distance of 27.01 feet (Rec. 27.00 feet); thence N.68000'58"E. a distance of 61.93 feet; thence N.75040158"E. a distance 63.00 feet (Rec. 60.30 feet); thence N.8904810011E. a distance of 331.53 feet; thence N.04012'00"W. a distance of , 119.41 feet (Rec. 119.34 feet); thence N.0204110311E. a distance of 60.08 feet; thence N.0001210011W. a distance of 119.94 feet (Rec. 120.00 feet); thence S.89050,15411W. a distance of 76.76 feet; thence S.89048'0411W. a distance of 160.00 feet; thence S.8101715211W. a distance of 141.92 feet; thence N.7105115811W. a distance of 75.52 feet; thence S.1800810211W. a distance of 95.67 feet; thence S.4003011511W. a distance of 130.05 feet; thence S.60000'0211W. a distance of 249.12 feet to the Point of Beginning; The owners hereby dedicate to the public use forever*the street and roads shown within this plat. Lot 2, 81ock 4, being a one- foot (11) strip as shown hereon are hereby dedicated to Spokane County as general county property, to be dedicated for road purposes at such time, as the road is continued as full width right of way, or until adjacent lands are platted. Tract "G" being private roads as shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION created by document recorded July 25, 1995 under State UBI Number 601-645-799. The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Plat having frontage thereon. A Temporary turnaround easement over Lots 6, 7, and 8, Block 2 is hereby granted to Spokane County until such time as Indiana Avenue is continued as a full width right of way and dedicated to Spokane County as a public road right of way, at which time the temporary turnaround easement will be vacated. Lot 8, Block 2 is hereby restricted from access onto Indiana Avenue until Indiana has been extended. Lot 1, Block 4 is he,reby restricted to access onto Snake River Lane unles-s an alternative access is approved by Spokane County Engineer. A twenty foot (201) access and utility easement for the benefit of Lot 1, Block 4 is hereby granted over the North 20.00 feet of Tra ~tv-~~ Siqht distance easement in Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2,~ as platted and shown hereon, are hereby granted to the public for the sole purpose of allowing a clear view sight distance triangle over and across the easements. The owners of said lots agree not to obstruct or in any manner allow any obstacle to block this clear view triangle between a height of three (3) feet and a heiqht of seven (7) feet above the road pavement elevation adjacent to said lots. Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right of inqress and egress to, over and from said easements for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of the sight distance area. Spokane County does not assume any responsibility to inspect or maintain the sight distance easements, nor does the County accept any liability for any failure by the lot owners to properly maintain such areas. If the property owner fails to maintain the sight distance area in reasonable conformance with the approved plans on file in the Off ice of the Spokane County Engineer, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If not corrected within the period indicated on the notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the sole expense of the property owner. The private roads, drainage easement and/or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. Drainage Easements are hereby granted over Tracts "A", "B", "C", "E" and "F" to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION. Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest. The private roads, drainage easements andjor common areas cannot be sold or transferred. The status of the areas designated as subservient estates for tax purposes cannot be changed without filing a replat. The owners of all lots within this subdivision shall be members of the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION and subject to the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws thereof. Subject to the DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTION AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENT, as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9507250312, which by reference is made a part thereof. Prli'vart'~e'mr'o'~a-d,s-at-re'~subj ect to separate DECMk4ffi IaN'~OtF-COV'~'A'~TTS . Covenant as recorded under Auditor's Document No. and which by reference is made a part thereof. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads, common areas andJor drainage easements. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maxntain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as provided herein. Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this f inal plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper 2oning approvals are obtained. A perpetual sewer line easement for the installation, operation and maintenance of sanitary sewer over the private roads as shown hereon is hereby granted to Spokane County, its successors and assigns for the sole purpose of construction, installing operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are or may be related to a sewer system. Spokane County, its successor and assigns at all time hereinafter at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops, brush, grass or trees that may interfere with the construction, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing and all other uses or purpose which are/may be related to a sewer system. The grantors reserve the right to use and enjoy that property which is subject to this easement for the purposes which will not interfere with the county full enjoyment of the rights hereby qranted; provided the grantors shall not erect or construct any building or other structure or drill on the easement or diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over the easement. The Easement described herein above is to and shall run with the land. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes . y B--'prptefkpmp~ t-`~YO'f "Wb -tro~p~r~•an~~~-oz the ownE^r(s)' property. PROVIDED this condition shall not prohibit: the owner ( s) or successor ( s) f rom obj ecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in c:onjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petitiori or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. A public: sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be author i:. ed . A temporary water line easement for the installation, operation and mairltenance of a public water system over the East ten feet (10') of Lot 8, Block 2, is hereby granted to Consolidated Irrigatiion District No. 19 for the sole purpose of construction, install`ing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replaciing, removing and all other uses or purposes which are or may be related to a public water system. Said easement maybe terminated at the discretion of Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19. . The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection districlt, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision; and the applicant shall ptrovide for individual domestic water service as well as fire pr+otection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot. Use of private wells and water system is prohibited. Utility and Water Main Easements are hereby granted over the private roads and over ten foot (101) and a sixteen foot (161) wide strips of land as shown hereon to the serving utility companies for the construction, reconstruction, mair►tenance and operation of the utilities. Together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim, and/or remove brush and trees that may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the sam.e. Sixteen.foot (161) Sidewalk Easement is hereby granted to the RIVERWA.LK OWNERS ASSOCIATION along Snake River Lane as shown hereon. A 16.5' Sidewalk Easement is hereby granted to the RIVERWA.LK OWNERS ASSOCIATION along Salmon River Lane as shown hereon. This Pl.at is subject to a Voluntary Mitigation Agreement as recorded under Auditor's Document No. 9507240089. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the aforesaid owners have hereunto set their hands this day of , 199 . STANTON-SPOKANE L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership BY: STANTON DEVELOPNiENT COMPA1dY, A Washington General Partnership IT5 General Partner 8Y: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation, . Partner BY: ITS 8Y: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation Partner BY: ITS MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation BY: ITS: TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation BY: ITS : SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a National Banking Association BY: r ITS: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss County of ~ On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the of DEAN BUILDING CORPOR.ATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON-SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrwnent and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss County of ) On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANT4N DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON-SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and off icial seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ~ )ss County of ) On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the of SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a Nations Banking Association, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of ) On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the President of TIMBERLAND SAVINGS BANK, a Washington Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the • corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for.the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ) ) ss Country of Canada ~ On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the Province of British Columbia, personally appeared , to me known to be the of MORVEST CAPITAL CORPORATION, a British Columbia Corporation, that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the Province of British Columbia, residing at My commission expires ~ ~r ~ • - . ' ' • ~~Q • .ti ~ , . _ ~ . : . . . • • . • r,~ . • . ; ' . • . . ~ . . OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County, Washington November 28, 1995 To: ~~~%G 61~' From: Development Engineering Services RE: Language for P.U.D. Plat Dedication & Coveaants Project #P1414A, Riverwalk 2nd Addition The private roads and/or common areas shown on this plat are hereby dedicated to the ~HOMC OwilerS ASSMULUM, created by document recorded under Auditor's document number . The private roads, as shown hereon, are easements which provide a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the Plat having frontage thereon. The private roads and/or common areas cannot be sold or transferred, regardless of any provisions in the covenants to the contrary, without express approval by Spokane County, and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein. Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of installing, operating, and maintaining drainage swales and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to the (HOME , or its successors in interest. This Plat is subject to the separate DECLARATION OF COVENANT as recorded under ~ ca~« Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a part hereof. {WARNING: The draft covenant must be approved by the County Engineer's Office PRIOR to recording the covenant!} e(nise I" Atc 5*46D &r&W&q5 7a ke6 &4P ft g45~ &4a*x4. t,. DECLARATION OF COVENANT In cousideration of the approval by Spokaue Couuty of P1414A, Riverwalk P.U.D., 2nd Addition, (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat"), the ulldersiguecl covenants and agrees that: 1. T'he subclivider/spoiisor will construct die private roads and associated drainage facilities in confornu«ce with the approvecl pla«s on file in the Couuty Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road froutage for the lot in the Plat is on the private road, or; b. a lot having frontage o❑ more than one road (public or private) constructs a.n approach to the private road. 3. The Riverwalk Howe Owners Association or its successors in interest shall mainta.in the private roads and . associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Eagineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for aiaintenauce of said private road, includ.ing associated drainage facilities, in conformance witls approved plaus on file with the County Engineer's office. 5. Maintenaiice fiumicing of the private ruads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a mawner deternuned by the Riverwalk Home Owners Association or their successors in interest. 6. Should the Riverwalk Home Owiiers Association be terniinated for any reason, the successors iu interest shall be the iadiviciual lot owiiers, or their successors iu interest, who are members of the Riverwalk Home Owners Association at die time of said termiuation. 7. ln the event such private road iucluding associated drainage facilities is uuproved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the Cowity is willing to accept the dedicatiou of such road aud drainage facilities, each lot owuer shall execute any conveyance documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owuers of lots withiu the Plat who are served by such road may sue and recover dauiages aud attorueys' fees from any owner of auy lot witiiin the Plat which is also served who refuses to participate in the road anci clrainage facilities cocistruction, financiug, and maiutenance. 9. WARNING: Spokaue County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintaiu or otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities coata.ined within or providing service to the property described iu the Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowiiig a building pemut to be issued for property on a private road, Spokaue County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge tUat the Couuty lias no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, exaniine, survey, construct, alter repair, iniprove, maintain, provide draiuage or saow removal on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the rigLt of iagress and egress to all private roads aud/or draiaage easeuients, for the purpose of iaspection and emergeucy maintenance of drainage swales, and any other clrainage facilities, if uot properly niaiutaiued by the Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to iiispect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the Riverwalk Homeowner's Associaqou, or their sueeessors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held respoasible for keeping open and mviutaining the surface path of naturaJ or man-niade draiiiage flow over and across tlieir respective properties. 12. The lot owner or uis representative shall inform each succeeding purcUaser of all clraiiiage easements on the property aud of his respotisibility for maiutaining surface draivage paths aud swales within said easements. 13. TUe Riverwalk Homeowner's Association, or their successors iu iiiterest, sliall niaiutain all water quality treatnieut swales ("208 swales") and drainage d.itcVes situated widvu tliis Plat, aud any portiou of a 208 swale situated in die public right-of-way adjacent to this Plat, widi a pernianeut growid cover as specihed on the cunent approved plaiis oa file with the County Engiueer's Office. Tue Riverwalk Howeowuer's Associatiou, or their successors in iiiterest, way install approvecl sluubbery aud/or trees which do uot obstruct the tlow and percolatiai of storm draivage water in the 208 swales aud draiuage ditc:hes, as iudicated by the curreiit approved plaiis oa file wiih the Couuty Eugineer's Office. 14. Spokaue Couuty does uot accept the respoiisibility of waintaiiung the cirainage course ou private lots witluu drainage easerueuts or tloodplain areas, nor die respausibility for any daiuage, whatsoever, iucluding but uot liuiited to iuverse couclemiiatiou to any properties sue to deficient construction and/or niaiiiteuance of drainage courses iu drainage easenients on private property. i-,-, ~ 15. Wheuever the Riverwalk Homeowner's Associatiou, or their successors in interest, fail to mainta.in the drainage facilities iu confonuance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be giveu to the Riverwalk Homeowuer's Associatiou, or their successors in interest, by the County. If uot corrected witluu the period indicated oo said notice, the County has the right to correct the maiutena.nce failure, or to have it corrected, at the expeiise of the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is coiistructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive draiuage away froni auy draiuage entry point to the building (includ.ing but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Sa.id positive drainage shall consist of a miiiinium slope of 3% away from the building for a d.istance of at least 10 feet from the builciing. Tlie lots shall be graded so that either a) all ruuoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage iutercepted ou the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. Tlie approveci draiuage facility shall be constructed in accorclance widi die approved plaiis oti file at the Cowity Engineer's Office. Any revisious to dhe approved draiiiage plaiis niust be approved by die County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. Tlus covevaut and agreenlent shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigiis, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. {INDIVIDUAL OR CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT} {INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT} (siQnature) _ (name) (siQnature) (iiame) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss Coi,wty of Spokane ) I certify diat I know or that I have satisfactory evideuce that (and ) is(are ) the persou(s) who appeared before nie , and said persons acknowledged that he(she)(they) signed ttvs instrument, on oath stated that he(she)(they) was(were) authorized to exec:ute the instruiuent aud acknowledged it as lvs(her)(their) free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes stated in the instrunieut. DATED diis day of , 199_. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Waslungton, residing at . My appointnient expires . ► ~ . . , . . , . . ~ . ~ • • `r ` ' ' ~ . , ' . . . - • ' . ' V. . , . ~ • , • , . . . , . . . ' • • . • . , ' ~ ~ . . • . ` , ' . ' , ' ' , ` ` • . • . • . ' ' • . ! ~ ~ ; ; • ' . . . , ' . . ' . . , , , • ' . , ' ' , ' _ . • ' • ' , . . . ; , • . - " ~ • . ' • • . . ' • . . . . ~ {CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT} (CORPORATION NAME) A{name of State of Incorporation} {Type of Corporate Entity} {e. g. , A Washiagtou Linuted Partnership} By: (Title) ~ STATE OF WASHIHGTON ) ) ss Couuty of Spokane ) I certify that I lcnow or that I have satisfactory evideace that is the person who appeared before me , and said person acknowledged that he(she) signed tlus instrument, on oath stated that he(slie) was authorized to execute tUe instrument and acknowledged it as the (Title) of (Corporation name) to be the free aud voluntary act of such corporation, for the uses and purposes stated in the instrument. DATED this day of , 199. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, resicling at . My appointmevt expires . \ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)45843840 Fax: (509)458-6844 . :.~:;;,r,.•.: . - : ,:{r :~.::x TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ~>::~=~:~=~v:~:: . .•.Y:.~.f:.~.~ ~ . . . • ' ti ~ ..{v: .;•~~:r:::.~...:::::::: ti ~ ~ . . • • ~ - . ATTENTION. Dave Berto ~~.t~~~fi~~~~~:: 1::.~;.:::: ~ ~ ' , , ' r • ~ . . :sin. x~ i: r . . }:~Y?b'•:}~titi~'r'~'r~ : ti~.3.+f.,; , , '>s:h•: r ~ . ~ . _ PROJECT PE•1414 T"NARil~~: ~~D~~:~ ~ . . , . . , . . . - - ~ . ~~.y~ ~ Description: ~ ■ Xerox Prints O Copy of Letter 0 0 Original Drawing 0 Contract Documents 0 ■ Titte Report ■ Declaration of Cov. ❑ No. Copies Description 1 Oriqinal Sipned and Norarized Dec:laration of Covenants ~ 2 Revised Final Plat 1 Up-dated Plat Certificate Purpose ■ Information 0 Review & Comments 0 Per Your Request * Written Approval 11 Signature & Return ■ File Remarks Dave - Enclosed please find the original Declaration of Covenants which ~ need to be filed. When you have the Auditor's Document Number please advise and I will put said number on the mylar. Also Enclosed is an up-dated Plat Certificate with title holder changes. Also enclosed is the revised Final Plat per your requested changes. If you have any additional comments, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Thank you. R~C, F'~ Signed: ' DEC 2 8 1995 ; ~ ' SPO`~Aii~ ~olv4ffl ENGiNEER - ' 7 .....E~.:,... . . . . _ , . _ L17 ~ t~-~~r~ 1Y ~~,ED ~ ~i ~+.-0 t~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMP NSTP 26'1996 ~ 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509 58-6844 ~ SPCKAriE C0RTY ENGfNEER . . . ~ TO: SPO ll DATE: ~ I.P.E. PROJECT G ~q 60 (7 ATTENTION: PROJECT NAME: Description LX Xerox Prints N~ Copy of Letter M~ Original Drawing I ~ Contract Documents M ~ M~ M~ Work Authorization M~ Report No. Copies Descriptiyn f f_:c'~~ C~IC~ ~ 5 Purpose rI Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request MI Written Approval I~ Signature & Return Remarks , QLA DL cS . Signed: D:\TRNSMT.PMS ; ' 16' WIDE SIDEWALK ' & UTILITY EASEMENT TYPE CURB 7 5. 00 ' ~-a w • Z ; ~ ; . ; LUJL„i % r I J 2 c 3 ~ <<~~ Y I~►~. w ~ t'j ~ FEXPIR-ES 9/24, ~ Q w o ;n ;o I~ Q r- SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD o TYPE "A" DRYWELL WITH ci ' TYPE 4 M ETAL FRAM E& LI D ~ 4 W I T H S O L I D L I D ~ m STA. 10+66 28' LT. LID EL. = 2025.69 ; I ; I , - 5' ~ 22' ~ ~.._..21,.. ~..~n~ 23 LF OF 12" CMP 5,(TYP ) @ 0.0321 FT./FT. IE W)=2022.37 ~ : . ~ IE~E)=2021.69 15'/20' BUILDING SETBACK ~ ~ ~ I o BOUNDARY OF LEVEL • cD • R ~ CURB INLET TYPE 1& 2 FLAT BOTTOM AREA STA. 10+56.55 LT. DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~61..• ~ TC=2025.60 .00 10' WIDE UTILITY "Z ~ l s;, ~ EASEMENT 51.20' ~ y'-. Z 5, SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD 6';,'~ID,EWgLfC ~ CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 ~ ` - ~ , . . , . • ` ~ WITH TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE \---TYPE P 0 N D GRATE STA=10+47(SNAKE ER LN.) 41.5' LT. B CURB - 2024.87 & GUTTER INDIANA AVENUE POND BOTTOM ELEV=2024.37 ` BERM ELEV=2425.80 SCALE: 1" =20' / 1 /00 I NLAND LOT 4, BLOCK 3 PACiFic . R IVE RWALK 2 N D AD D ITI 0 N ENGINEERING ~ 707 Weat 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 ` 10/30/95 J~ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ~ CURB INLET TYPE 1& 2 1 STA=12+50 RT. TC=2026.37 TYPE "R" CURB » PON D Cl, ,V,,zo ~~O l i l ~ • ~ TYPE "B" CURB & GUTTER CONCRETE INLET TYPE I WITH . ~p~`~'~ ~ Op,~~ p ~P•~~.•~,a~~ ~ j i TYPE 2 METAL FRAME & GRATE , ~5~~ ~0 , ~ i \v ~ ~ iL, 36.5' RT. % ~ 2,~ ~s, (n STA-12+00 ~ ~ GRATE ELEV=2025.47 ; ~`i~'/ 6ai ~ ~ ~ ~ P~~ \.,p~ i/~~i• ~~PG,~ i 6 O~P\C~ ~'G~ ~ i' 47 LF OF 12" CMP ~ ~~1~•' ~ ~ F / @ 0.0100 FT./FT. ~ ' i ~ ~ ~~~0 i'~ ~ ~ / IE E)=2022.27 G~ ~ 15z \~s~.•~ iE~w)=2o21.so 1~,1. ~ \ . % . EXIST. SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH ~ . TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & LID WITH SOLID LID STA=11+54 28' RT. 16' WIDE SIDEWALK & ADJUST LID TO 2027.11 ~ UTILITY EASEMENT . ` ~ . . ~ ~ POND BOTTOM ELEV=2024.97 t62 ~ BERM ELEV=2026.57 ~ , . ~ scALE: 1" =20' I NLAND S, LOT 1, BLOCK 1 PACIFIC • RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION ENGINEERING 10 30 95 707 waat 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 \ ~ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844*f • 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT ~ 76.76' I IYPE " R" CURB ti I W w I ~ R• Z L ~ tio g Q i - 6.5'1 ' ~ ~ r 11 50' ~ I ' ~ z5462 5, w I Y s' I--~- I ~ Z EIEPfRES 9/24/ • ~ ~ 4, I I I ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD zo TYPE "B" DRYWELL WITH - co lYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE 1 I y STA. 10+66 33' RT. GRATE EL. = 2024.87 CURB INLET TYPE 1 I0 STA. 10+56.55 RT. TC=2025.60 •u . 15'/20' BUILDING SETBACK . •5, ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - 10' WIDE UTILITY 15.7 , , ~EASEMENT 1 , 61.76 ~ ; ; • : ; • ; . ` 6,',•'S1DEW¢tK , ; r r • ' r ; ' i.__ , . , . . . _ . . . . . , . • I ~N' • ' P 0 N D" F3" \-TYPE cuRB ~ & GUTTER ~ i INDIANA AVENUE ° ~ ~ POND BOTTOM ELEV=2024.37 ` BERM ELEV=2025.80 SCALE: 1" =20' ~ 40 ~ I NLAND ` LOT 1, B LO C K 4 PaciFic RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION ENGINEERING 707 West 7th ~ Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 ~ 10/30/95,/ `Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-684400 ~ ~ R/W DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN ~ . TOP OF BERM ELEV.= ,9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER TOP OF CURB ELEV. l1NE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST +.20' CURB DROP TO THE POND Allj NORMAL TMPE "g3 MAX. GUTTER UNE CURB tr• ; . • GRATE ELEVATION " ~n..`,:'''`' " . \ , 3 MAX. 3:1 (11'P) 1 ,50' DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS CONCRETE APRON •4" THICK P.C.C. w ~ GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE . NOTES: . TYPICAL '208' POND PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN ` YWEO D BETWEEN S ECTI 0 NAL VI EW THE WASHED DIRA NN ROCK ND THE DRA LL BARR (NOT TO SCALE) 2546 NAI. i EXPIRES 9/24/ ~ ` J ~ 208 CROSS SECTION SCALE; 1p=20' INLAND \ R IVERWALK 2 N D AD D ITI O N PACIFIC ENGINEERING . 10 30 95 707 West 7th • Sufte 200 (549) 458-6840 ` Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (508) 458-6844~ \ / R/W ` DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN ~ TOP OF BERM ELEV.= ,5' BELOW THE NORMAL GUITER TOP OF CURB ELEV. LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST +.24' CURB OROP TO THE POND NORMAL n'PE " B" 3 MAX. GUTTER UNE CURB ~ J! GRATE ELEVATION 3:1 (lYP) 3 MAX. ~ ~ .50' Ii- CONCREfE APRON 4" THICK P.C.C. ~ GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE 0 F '~s A NOTES: PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN NP CAL ~ZO~' POND ~ THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASMED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. S ECTI 0 NAL VI EW 2~~ (NOT TO SCALE) ~NAI, EXPIRES 9/24/ ~ ~ 208 CROSS SECTION scALE: 1" =20' i~=~ i NLAND~ * \ I I im PACIFIC .RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION ENGINEERING 10 30 95 707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 -.0/ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844OOF \ R/W ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PIAN ~ TOP OF BERM ELEV.= ,5' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER TOP OF CURB ELEV. UNE EIEVATION OF THE LOWEST +,2a' CURB DROP TO THE POND NORMAL ROLLED 3 MAX. GUTfER LINE --\CURB 1 GRATE ELEVATION . ; ; ~ 3 MAX. 4:1 (TYP) ; .50' H 4 THICK P.C.C. CONCRETE APRON - GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE ~r? ~ o w d~f A TYPICAL '208' POND ~ , S ECTI 0 NAL VI EW (NOT TO SCALE) NOTES: 2546 PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN ~ THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN IONqI, THE WASHED ORAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. IEXPIRES 9/24/ ~ /00 sc&E: 1"=209 I NLAND ~ 208 CROSS SECTION PACIFIC -RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION tior. ENGINEERING 10 30 95 707 we8t 7tn • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844' R/W R/W DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN . TOP OF BERM ELEV.= .9' BELOW THE NORMAL GUTTER TOP OF CURB ELEV. LINE ELEVATION OF THE LOWEST +,20' CURB DROP TO THE POND NORMAL ROLLED 3 MAX. 1 GUTTER LINE _\CURB ~ ..w . GRATE ELEVATION ~ 3 MAX. ~ 4:1 (TYP) 17 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE ~ 1 .50' WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS CON 4 THICK P.C.C. ~ GRASS TURF INSTALLED CONCURRENT ~R ~IItA WITH OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE TYPICAL '208' POND ~.4 . ; 25 ~ NOTES: S ECTI O NAL VI EW PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN (NOT TO SCALE) ~ THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN ~J THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. EXPIRES 9/24/ ~ ~ 208 CROSS SECTION SCALE: 1" =20' I NLAND \ -RIVERW PACIFIC , ALK 2 N D AD D ITI O N ENGINEERING 10 30 95 707 west 7th • suRe 200 (509) 458-6840 \ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844OOIF 1 , 6 ~ Pi 4 ~ Rjjft-P_ STA'CISTICS DATC , Plat Check Fee Number of I.ots O Road Miles (New) Total Area 4r. • x.,~ MAP ' Norih Arrow Scale ri LeRend Procedures & Equipment Basis of BearinRs Plat Location Bv Title - i Official SiRnature Blocks ~ Survevors Ceriificate Road Names Road Widlhs Adiacent Area C~ Lot & Block Numbers ~j►~ R/W Dedication desiRnated ~ 1 Foot Strips 3 RPS on GLO Corners Tract X Lot Areas . Bench Mark Closure ~ ,-5 -D4e.2 9 aqbUA 16UDJU4 Description (To Map) ~ Descriation (To Cert) CJ~~ Owners Certificate to Plat r Y ► 1 Foot Strius RID - CPR Statement /V Access Prohibited AJ. 4 R/W Dedication . ~ DrainaRe Language S~ Y. • Q~ . Drainage Covenant /t Flood Insurance . "74, , Stormwater Management • ~ 208 Bonds - $1,000.00 ea •208 PLANS APPROVED Private Road Doc. #'s IV6~19 ~ . Private Road Warning ~ , . Road Plans /Vz%~~ f . Bonci Road Imuro *14-3z R.1 qg . ~i Signed By Engineer 6 , 1V - q (o S u 1 N , ~ ~~jr Q) G0'ZI P. G2. ~ , . c c Ir 5 C~ ((5-h fUs -~-~~re ~s O 7-IFa Xq n~ ~ k1d\hp1atlist.ck /A coP y 9601030054 ORIGINA!. FILF^ 01; RECORDED JAN 0, 3 1996 Wu1v 11 Kuu:l OR SPOKANE COUNTY, VUN. DECLARATION OF CnVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of P1414A, RIVERWALK P.U.D., 2nd ADDITION (hereinafter refened to as the "Plat"), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider/sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by the private road when: (a) the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road; or (b) a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and assoaated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteradon thereof and served by a private road shall be respons~le for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conromance with approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest. 6. Should RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION be terminated for any reasons, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drai.nage facilities is improved to 8pokane County standards for public streets, and t6e County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and draiaage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such road, may sue and recover da.mages and attomeys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is similarly served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. WARNING: Spokane Cownty has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in this Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construd, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its associated drainage facilities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted tbe right of ingress and egress to all private roads and/or drainage easement, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilides, if not property maintained by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any Gability for failure by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest to properly maintain such areas. 11. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all draiaage easement on the property and of his responsibility for maintaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. 1 AO\ ~ l 13. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or the"v successors in interest, shall maintain all water quality treatment swales ("208" swales") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in the public right-of-way adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approval plans on file with the County Engi.neer's Office. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and/or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 14. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage cowses in drai.nage easements on private progerty. 15. Whenever the RNERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to the RNERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest, by the County. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, the County has the right to conect the maiatenance failure or to have it conected at the expense of the Homeowner's Association, or their successors in interest. 16. Any buildiag that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away &om the building, and , conveyed over the lot to a natural drai.nage swales or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lots is disposes of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage facility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engioeer's Office. Any rev,sions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, theu heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. Dated this day of , 19_. STAIV'TON-SPOKANE L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership BY: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A Washington General Partnership TTS General Partner BY: HOUSLEY DEVELQPMENT CORPOR.ATION, A Washington Corporation, Partner BY: ►J ITS C S• dt ~ BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation Partner BY: rrs 2 4pk. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of xime, ) . On this i 9 TN day of D:E c g,r, Bt,e , 19 9s► before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared mw~b ,*6f*^-, , to me known to be the AAFs,A f ti, of DEAN BUII..DING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, aad partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoin.g instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the, free and voluntary acx and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oat6 stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. ~•~~~t~~~ ~ R~ ~ 1~;,, ~ NOT P .IC in and for the State of g 10 N F0 9 w Was h i n g ton, resi d i ng at Spe kane G y v.~• w o o p ~ : 0 N 0 T q Ry My commission expires i ~ V • . y • ~ :(o pV8L1G 47 ~ ~►'••,C-15-95 ,`4~•° fell►0` , STATE OF WASHINGTON )ss County of ,&,.v4 ) , On this iS -11 day of 19 ~ before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared N /54 vsi- E &a , to me known to be the Axts,,o f ti r'of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, aad partner of STANTON DEVEI.OPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnersbip that executed the within and foregoing instrument, a.nd acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary ad and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that be is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given wnder my hand and offcial seal the day and 7yelast, above written. R o - w~ F~;yp9 •w NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of . .4 N 0 TA q y-~ ;r, ~ Washington, residing at Spokanc- LY^IArAJOo6 . m ~ A My commission expues s-S~ : RV8L1G ~ 5•96 ~ NIA 3 DCCLARATION OF COVCNANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of (hereinaCter referred to as the "Development"), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. Ttie subdivider/sponsor will construct the private raads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 2. A lot is setved by a private road when: a. the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road, or; b. a lot having frontage an more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. The Home Owners Association or their successors in interest shall maintain thc private roads and associated drainagc facilities in canformance a7th the approved plans vn file in the County Engineer's OfGce. 4. The owncr(s) of any lot crcated by the Devcloprnent or altematian thereof and served b}' a prn•ate road shall be respxsrisible feT maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities. 5. Maintenance Gnancing of the private rnads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determine-d ty the Ifome Ch;,ners Association or their sucresvors in 'rnterev. 6. Should the . Ilome 0wners Association be tetminated for am• reas-^n. the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are mernbers of the Home Owners Association at the time of said termination. 7. In the event sueh private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets. and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary -to accomplisli sucli dedication. 8. Owners of lots witliin the Development who are served by such road, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees froro any owner of any lot within the Development which is similarly served who refUSes to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance. 9. VVARNING: Spokane County fiais no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in the Development. By accepting this development or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assurnes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow rerooval on a private road or its' associated drainage facilities. 10. Whgnever the Home Owners Association or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a natice will be given to the ITome Owners Association or their successors in interest by the County. If not corrected after 10 days, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense of the fIome Owners nssociation, their successors in interest, or lots in the development. 11. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, no tlie responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage ea.Sements on private property. 12. This cavenant and agreement shall nin with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in tlie rnaintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. OIVN FR OWNER Dated this day of , 19 . STATE OF VVASHINGTON ) County of Spokanc ) On this day personally appeared before me known to me to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and dced for the uses and purPoscs therein stated. G(VEN UNDCR MY IIAND AND Or1+1C[AL SEAL lhis dny of ,19_ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane ~ k~Weclnrn.pud l l93 l I~ r~ FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO P1414A RIVERWALK SECOND ADDITION PLAT BOUNDRY 10-12-95 D.B. AUTO INVERSE START 3314. 00141 3050. 32491 1 1 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 159.0800 3176.23332 3129.86357 2 2 SNV N 60 00 02.0 E 269.9600 3311.21106 3363.65710 3 3 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 27.0100 3287.81958 3377.16187 4 4 INV N 68 00 58.0 E 61.9300 3311.00282 3434.58889 5 5 INV N 75 40 58.0 E 63.0000 3326.58210 3495.63220 6 6 INV Ai 89 48 00.0 E 331.5300 3327.73936 3827.16018 7 7 INV N 0 12 00.0 W 119.4100 3447.14863 3826.74336 8 8 INV N 2 41 03.0 E 60.0800 3507.16272 3829.55693 9 9 INV N 0 12 00.0 W 119.9400 3627.10199 3829.13826 10 10 INV S 89 50 54.0 W 76.7600 3626.89880 3752.37853 11 11 INV S 89 48 04.0 W 160.0000 3626.34339 3592.37949 12 12 I N V S 81 17 52.0 W 141. 9200 3604 . 87102 3452. 09328 13 13 INV N 71 51 58.0 W 75.5200 3628.37576 3380.32422 14 14 INV S 18 08 02.0 W 95.6700 3537.45751 3350.54802 15 15 INV S 40 30 15.0 W 130.0500 3438.57286 3266.08011 16 16 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 249.1200 3314.01495 3050.33466 17 LAT & DEP -0.01353 -0.00975 17 HCLOSE S 35 46 04.4 W 0.0167 3314.00141 3050.32491 1 PREC = 1 TO 128348 Area = 192185.45 sq ft 4.41197 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO CENTERLINE INDIANA AVENUE AUTO IMVERSE START 3314. 00141 3050. 32491 1 1 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 43.0000 3276.76211 3071.82454 18 18 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 134.3100 3343.91599 3188.14107 19 19 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 73.3700 3380.60037 3251.68171 20 RADIAL N 29 59 58.0 W DELTA 29 48 02.0 RT RADI US 715. 0000 TAN 190. 2505 L-ARC 371. 8842 RADIAL N 0 11 56.0 W RP 2761.38874 3609.17570 21 20 CHORD N 74 54 03.0 E 367.7066 3476.38443 3606.69375 22 TAN@PT N 89 48 04.0 E 12 INV N 89 48 04.0 E 106.2000 3476.75308 3712.89311 23 23 INV N 89 48 04.0 E 115.2500 3477.15314 3828.14242 24 24 INV N 2 41 03.0 E 30.0400 3507.16018 3829.54920 25 LAT & DEP 0.00253 0.00773 25 HCLOSE N 71 51 15.5 E 0.0081 3507.16272 3829.55693 9 PREC = 1 TO 107501 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO CEMTERLINE SNAKE RIVER LANE AUTO INVERSE START 3476. 75308 3712. 89311 23 23 IN1V N 0 11 56.0 W 150.0000 3626.75218 3712.37242 26 26 INV N 89 48 04.0 E 40.0000 3626.89103 3752.37218 27 LAT & DEP 0.00777 0.00635 27 HCLOSE N 39 14 55.8 E 0.0100 3626. 89880 3752. 37853 11 PREC = 1 TO 18938 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO CENMTERLINE SALMON RIVER LANE SOUTH OF INDIANA AVE AUTO INVERSE START 3343.91599 3188.14107 19 19 INV S 29 59 43.0 E 116.0800 3243.38297 3246.17278 29 29 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 134.3000 3176.23410 3129.86492 30 LAT & DEP -0.00078 -0.00135 30 HCLOSE S 59 59 21.4 W 0.0016 3176.23332 3129.86357 2 PREC = 1 TO 160662 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO START 3343. 91599 3188. 14107 19 29*19 BEARING 19 TRAV N 29 59 43.0 W 43.0000 3381.15685 3166.64414 31 104.03+30.29 DISTANCE 31 TRAV S 60 00 02.0 W 134.3200 3313.99798 3050.31895 32 FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO CENTERLIHE SALMOM RIVER LANE MORTH OF INDIAAIA AVE AUTO IMVERSE START 3343. 91599 3188. 14107 19 19 I N V N 29 59 43.0 W 43 . 0000 3381. 15685 3166 . 64414 31 31 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 134.3200 3313.99798 3050.31895 32 LAT b DEP 0.00344 0.00595 32 HCLOSE N 59 59 58.6 E 0.0069 3314.00141 3050.32491 1 PREC = 1 TO 25800 No Area FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO BLOCK 1 CLOSURE AUTO INVERSE START 3176. 23332 3129. 86357 2 2 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 116.8000 3234.63234 3231.01590 33 33 INV N 29 59 43.0 W 56.0800 3283.20136 3202.97991 34 RADIAL N 60 00 17.0 E DELTA 90 00 15.0 LT RADIUS 30.0000 TAN 30.0022 L- ARC 47.1261 RADIAL N 29 59 58.0 W RP 3268.20350 3176.99791 35 34 CHORD N 74 59 50.5 W 42.4279 3294.18441 3161.99816 36 TAN@PT S 60 00 02.0 W 36 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 86.8000 3250.78513 3086.82673 37 37 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 86.0800 3176.23725 3129.86601 38 LAT 8. DEP -0.00393 -0.00244 38 HCLOSE S 31 51 29.1 W 0.0046 3176.23332 3129.86357 2 PREC = 1 TO 84946 Area = 9861.14 sq f t 0.22638 ac F'ROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO BLOCK 2 SIDELIMES AUTO INVERSE START 3311. 21106 3363. 65710 3 3 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 27.0100 3287.81958 3377.16187 4 4 I NV N 68 00 58.0 E 61.9300 3311. 00282 3434. 58889 5 5 INV N 75 40 58.0 E 63.0000 3326.58210 3495.63220 6 6 INV N 89 48 00.0 E 331.5300 3327.73936 3827.16018 7 7 INV N 0 12 00.0 W 119.4100 3447.14863 3826.74336 8 8 INV S 89 48 04.0 W 219.9400 3446.38516 3606.80468 39 RADIAL N 0 11 56.0 W UELTA 29 48 02.0 LT RADIUS 6851"'00 ~ TAN 182~_ ~80 L-ARC 356.2807 RADIAL N 29 59 58.0 W RP ~ 2761.38929 3609.18250 40 39 CHORD S 74 54 03 ) W 352. 2783 3354. ~''01 3266. 68825 41 TAN@PT S 60 00 02.0 W ~41 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 25.8700 3341.68523 3244.28405 42 RADIAL N 29 59 58.0 W DELTA 89 59 45.0 LT RADIUS 30.0000 TAN 29.9978 L-ARC 47.1217 RADIAL S 60 00 17.0 W RP 3315.70432 3259.28379 43 42 CHORD S 15 00 09.5 W 42.4249 3300.70646 3233.30180 44 TAN@PT S 29 59 43.0 E 44 INV S 29 59 43.0 E 56.0800 3252.13745 3261.33779 45 45 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 118.1600 3311.21646 3363.66793 46 LAT & DEP -0.00540 -0.01083 46 HCLOSE S 63 29 40.3 W 0.0121 3311.21106 3363.65710 3 PREC = 1 TO 117843 Area = 65919.85 sq ft 1.51331 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO BLOCK 4 SIDELINES AUTO IMVERSE START 3507. 16272 3829. 55693 9 9 INV N 0 12 00.0 W 119.9400 3627.10199 3829.13826 10 10 INV S 89 50 54.0 W 76.7600 3626.89880 3752.37853 11 il INV S 89 48 04.0 W 15.0000 3626.84673 3737.37862 47 47 INV S 0 11 56.0 E 90.0000 3536.84727 3737.69103 48 RADIAL S 89 48 04.0 W DELTA 90 00 00.0 LT RADIUS 30.0000 TAN 30.0000 L-ARC 47.1239 RADIAL S 0 11 56.0 E Rp 3536.95141 3767.69085 49 48 CHORD S 45 11 56.0 E 42.4264 3506. 95159 3767. 79499 50 TAN@PT N 89 48 04.0 E 50 INV N 89 48 04.0 E 61.7600 3507.16597 3829.55462 51 LAT & DEP -0.00326 0.00231 51 HCLOSE S 35 21 56.8 E 0.0040 3507.16272 3829.55693 9 PREC = 1 TO 102823 Area = 10815.77 sq ft 0.24830 ac E'ROM AMGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO BLOCK 3 SIDELIMES AUTO INVERSE START 3626. 34339 3592. 37949 12 12 INV S 81 17 52.0 W 141.9200 3604.87102 3452.09328 13 13 INV N 71 51 58.0 W 75.5200 3628.37576 3380.32422 14 14 INV S 18 08 02.0 W 95.6700 3537.45751 3350.54802 15 15 INV S 40 30 15.0 W 130.0500 3438.57286 3266.08011 16 16 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 84.5200 3396.31357 3192.88324 52 RADIAL S 25 28 57.0 W DELTA 55 28 55.0 LT RADIUS 30.0000 TAN 15.7777 L-ARC 29.0503 RADIAL S 29 59 58.0 E Rp 3423.39507 3205.79030 53 52 CHORD N 87 44 29.5 E 27.9285 3397.41416 3220.79005 54 TAN@PT N 60 00 02.0 E 54 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 18.3700 3406.59901 3236.69902 55 RADIAL N 29 59 58.0 W DELTA 29 48 02.0 RT RADI US 745.0000 7"AN 1 yt3. 1:j:3(Q L-ARC 387. 4878 RADI AL N 0 11 56.0 W RP 2761.40647 3609.19276 56 55 CHORD N 74 54 03.0 E 383.1348 3506.40198 3606.60668 57 TAN@PT N 89 48 04.0 E 57 INV N 89 48 04.0 E 51.2000 3506.57971 3657.80637 58 RADIAL S 0 11 56.0 E DELTA 90 00 00.0 LT RADIUS 30.0000 TAN 30.0000 L-ARC 47.1239 RADIAL N 89 48 04.0 E RP 3536.57953 3657.70223 59 58 CHORD N 44 48 04.0 E 42.4264 3536.68367 3687.70205 60 TAN@PT N 0 11 56.0 W 60 INV N 0 11 56.0 W 90.0000 3626.68312 3687.38964 61 61 INV S 89 48 04.0 W 95.0000 3626.35336 3592.39021 62 LAT & DEP -0.00996 -0.01071 62 HCLOSE S 47 05 13.6 W 0.0146 3626.34339 3592.37949 12 PREC = 1 TO 85166, Area = 45498.21 sq ft 1.04450 ac FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO AREA TRACT A AUTO IHVERSE START 3314 . 00141 3050. 32491 1 1 INV S 29 59 58.0 E 13.0000 3302.74302 3056.82480 63 63 INV N 60 00 02.0 E 79.3100 3342.39736 3125.50966 64 RADIAL S 29 59 58.0 E DELTA 55 28 55.0 LT kADI US 30.0000 TAN 15.7777 L-ARC 29.0503 RADI AL S 85 28 53.0 E Rp 3368.37826 3110.50991 65 64 CHaRD N 32 15 34.5 E 27.9285 3366.01478 3140.41666 66 TAN@PT N 4 31 07.0 E 66 INV S 60 00 02.0 W 104.0300 3314.00065 3050.32353 67 LAT b DEP 0.00077 0.00137 67 HCLOSE N 60 49 24.7 E 0.0016 3314.00141 3050.32491 1 PREC = 1 TO 143519 Area = 1256.68 sq ft 0.02885 ac ~ a . • S P O YC A N E C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGWEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer August 28, 2000 Hartford Financial Service Group, Inc. Hartford Plaza, 690 Asvlum Ave. ' Hartford, CT 06115 RE: Maintenance Bond Number 52BCSAB5483 for Residential Construction of Riverwalk 2°d & 31d Addition. (P 1414A & 1414B) / Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised tire Maintenance Bond Number 52BCSAB5483 dated Mav 18 1999 issued by vour companv as surety for a maintenance bond for tre above-mentioned plat in tire remaining cunent amount of $2,123.00 mav now be released in full effective immediatelv. Riverwalk 2nd & 3`d Addition Roads irave been establisired and tike warrantv period iras expired. TiLas final release sil:ould close out tire above referenced maintenance bond. If vou irave anv questions, please call me. Sincerelv, C-!~Xd G ) - Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: Sandv Kimball Randy Stronks File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 ' ' - ; . . The Hartford Insurance Group . ' • Hartford Plaza Hartford, Connecticut 06115 RIDER . • To be attached to and form part of Bond Numb~er 52B,5AB54$3 execut2d by K. C. CONSTRUCTI0N; I2JC. . a s P r in c ip a 1, and I3ARTFORD. CASUALTY INSUR.ANCE CQMPArdY in f av or ' of., SPOK.ANE COUNTY, jJASHINGTON and dated A.PRIL 20' , 1999 . , In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is , hereby agreed that:' : . ' • r' . . . . . . ' , ' BOND NUMEER IS CHANGID FROM : 5233CSAP 5483 • T0: 52BSBAB5523 . T:Ze attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements., limitations . and conditions except as herein expressly modified. • This rider shall become effective as of the 20r1Hday of APRIL • 1999. : Signed, sealed and dated this 26TH day of MAY .1999. K . C . CONSTRU TION,;~I1C . Principal . By: ~ . . . ' MIKE KLIKA, PRESIDENT . . . . • - HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURAI? CE' C0II1-PA1\.' . . . . ' ; By ' • . - . OANNE ~Tbl!ANI Attorney":.n--Fact MAINTENANCE BOND Bond No. 52BCSAB5483 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we K. C. CONSTRUCTiOA1, INC. as Principai, and i3ARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COiIPANY corporation, as Surety, are held firmiy bound unto SPOKAidE COUN1 `I , WASiiIIJGTON as Obligee, in the full and just sum of TWO THOUSAND ONE 'ffUNDRED TWEtJiY '1'iiREE AND td0/ I OOT'riS Dollars 2 , 123 . 00 for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administra- tors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principal entered into a contract with SPOKAPiE COUNTY, WASHIIIGTON dated OCTOBER 7, 1996 for RIJERWALK SUBDIVISIOIl, 2ND & 3RD ADDITIONS P- I 4 14A At1D P-14 14 B WHEREAS, said contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of ONE year(s) after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period, and WHEREAS, the said coniract has been completed, and was approved on APRIL 20, 1999 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDiTION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within OrTE year(s) from the date of approval of the said contract, the work done under the terms of said contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said contract, or' it sh311 appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. Signed and sealed this 18TH day of MAY i5 99 - Witness: K. C. CONSTRUCTIOtd, IIdC. ~ . B Y J ~ . Mike Klik~, PresidPnr Principal !1ART ORD CASUALTY IP1S RAil1Cr", COI•f?AidY ~ . By: Attomey-in-Fact oaNNE ToiTANz BOP-2308 4194 0 K. C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. • ' 2025 West Dakota Avenue Post Office Box 1455 Hayden Lake, Idaho 83835-1455 Phone (208) 765-3949 Fax (208) 772-2517 , RECEIVED MAY 2 s 1999 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER May 25, 1999 Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Attention: Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager Subject: Bond Release for Riverwalk 2"d & 3" Addition and Warranty Bond Dear Bill: Please find enclosed our Maintenance Bond No. 52BCSAB5483 for the above referenced project as per your request of May 7, 1999. As per same request, we'd appreciate you faxing Hartford Insurance Group with a bond release authorization. Thank you. f~~ V 1 J fer LYda ice Manager . ' i S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Counry Engineer May 27, 1999 NIs. JoAnne Tonani Sedwick James of Washington, Inc. P.O. Box 2151 Spokane, WA 99210-2151 RE: Release of Bond #341266 - The Hartford Insurance Group Riverwalk 2°d & 3~d Additions - P-1414A & P-1414B Dear JoAnne: We received the maintenance/warranty bond for the above project on May 26, 1999 in the required amount of $ 2,123.00. . - You are hereby authorized to release bond number 341266 in full, from the Hartford Insurance Group, effective immediately. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, . . ~ , . . ` . ~ . Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: File, KC Construction 1026 W. Broadway Ave. ~ Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 3243166 ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DNIS[ON OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISIOII OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. johns, P.E., County Engineer May 7, 1999 Mr. Mike Klika KC Construction Company P.O. Box 1455 . Hayden Lake, Idaho 83837-1455 RE: Bond Release for Riverwalk 2°d & 3rd Addition and Warranty Bond - P-1414A & P-1414B Dear Mike: Spokane County accepted Indiana Avenue for maintenance and inclusion in its road system as a public road on April 20, 1999. We need to release your performance bond number 341266 from Hartford Insurance Group that is currently in force on this project and replace it with a Warranty Bond. The Warranty Bond should run from April 20, 1999 for a one year period in the amount of $ 2,123.00. I am enclosing a copy of a bond form we have accepted for a warranty bond. As soon as we receive the wai•ranty boiid, I witl fax Hartford Insurance group with a bond release authorization. If you have any questions, please contact me at 509-456-3600. Thanks Sincereiy, 6IL- ~ 0 . . > Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: Bond File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 9 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 ~ , ~ . ~ K-c C.o , Pr AS . DATE: MARCH 10 1998 0, ~~1y55 ' 6 3837-- TO: ROB BINGER, PROSECUTERS ~ ~ ~ FROM: JIlVI RADKE, ENGINEERS RE: RIVERWALK 2ND ADDITION: ACTION ON ROAD IlVIPROVEMENT BOND Dear Rob, I need help......... Question: Can the County legally take action against Hartford Insurance Group Roadway Improvement Bond #341266. I am transmitting you a copy of the letter I sent to the developer of Riverwalk 2nd Addition regarding taking action on the referenced bond. I am not entirely sure that the language in the bond allows the County to do this at this time. It is a bit funky. The project plans were approved on October 31, 1995. The project was originally bonded by the developer via a cash set aside letter dated June 7, 1996. The project was substantially constructed during the 1996 construction season. Then the developer was able to somehow persuade the contractor that he had hired (KC Construction) to put up a bond to replace his cash set aside. KC Construction put up a bond that combined $39,726.14 worth of bond amount on this project and $2,743.00 on Riverwalk 3`d Addition that KC Construction was also building for this developer. The Hartford Insurance Group issued a bond to KC Construction (Principal) signed October 2, 1996 referencing a substantial completion date of October 1, 1996. There is also another signed bond form that is in our standard format. This one references a completion date of 2 years....... but it neglects to say 2 years from when. So, the bottom line on this project is that everyone wants it done, and not to drag out for another year or two. Can the County take the bond? ; ~ i ~ ~ 1 - S ~i ' P)q)qA Sedgwick Sedgwick of Washington, Inc. A 601 West Main, Suite 1400, PO Box 2151, Spokane, Washington 99210-2151 Telephone 509 358-3900. Facsimile 509 358-3937 RECEIVED JUN 2 g 1999 SP. ~vUNTY ENGINEER June 25, 1999 Bill Hemmings Spokane County 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Bond #52BCSAB5483 - K.C. Construction, Inc. Dear Mr. Hemmings: Please find enclosed a rider changing the bond number from 52BCSAB5483 to 52BSBAB5523 for your files. If you have any questions, please contact either JoAnne Tonani or myself. Sincerely, Dana Durall Bond Department Encl. ouA4DUq4~r ~Q ISO N ISO ~ 9091 Tt V9092 v\SGS SOB EQcr EQCI for Insuranca Broking Risk Services Employee Benefits Personal insurance ~ . / _ 'T`he Hartford Insurance Group . ' • Hartford Plaza . Hartford, Connectlcu t 06115 , . ' RIDER . To be attached to and form part of Bond Number 52BCSAB5483 executzd by K. C. COIVSTPUCTION; INC. a s P r inc i p a 1, and HARTFORD CASUALTY IRTSURANrE CQMPAr~_' y, . i n f av o r' o f_ S POKAIJE CO=, [JASIfINGTON _ and dated APRIL 20' , 1999 . In consideration of the premium charged for the attached'bond, it is . hereby agreed that: BOND NUMEER IS CHANGED FROM : 5233CSAfi5483 zo: 52BSBAB5523 - T►ze attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements., limitations . and conditions except as herei.n expressly modified. . This rider shall become effective as of the 20THday of A.PRIL 1999. . Signed, sealed and dated this 26'1'H day of rAY .1999. K. C . CONSTItU TION.,,-;INC . , j Principal . By: ~ . . , ' . . . , . MIKE KLIKA, PRESIDENT . , . H~.~2 TFORD CASUA.LTY INSUR:AN,~F"COt IMN : . - By . . . . . pA.l~NE TONANI Attorney =in,-Fact ; _ . . . , . . S P O K A. N E C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGINEERING AIVD ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer May 27, 1999 Ms. JoAnne Tonani Sedwick James of Washington, Inc. P.O. Box 2151 Spokane, WA 99210-2151 RE: Release of Bond #341266 - The Hartford Insurance Group Riverwalk 2°d & 3rd Additions - P-1414A & P-1414B Dear JoAnne: We received the maintenance/warranty bond for the above project on May 26, 1999 in the required amount of $ 2,123.00. . You are hereby authorized to release bond number 341266 in full, from the Hartford Insurance Group, effective immediately. If you have any questions, please call me. . Sincerely, . . . . ~ . Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: File, KC Construction 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(5d9) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 _ ~ rr `i ! ;\t`fs; NS K. C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2025 West Dakota Avenue Post Office Box 1455 Hayden Lake, Idaho 83835-1455 Phone (208) 765-3989 Fuc (208) 772-2517 ~ RECEIVED MAY 2 6 1999 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER May 25, 1999 Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Attention: Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager Subject: Bond Release for Riverwalk 2"d & Y' Addition and Warranty Bond Dear Bill: Please find enclosed our Maintenance Bond No. 52BCSAB5483 for the above referenced proj ect as per your request of May 7, 1999. As per same request, we' d appreciate you faxing Hartford lnsurance Group with a bond release authorization. Thank you. ~ ~ ~ r fer I.yda ice Manager c~ • ~ MAINTENANCE BOND Bond No. 52BCSAB5483 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we K. C. CONSTRUCTI0N, INC. as Principai, and iiARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE C014PAiVY corporation, as Surety, are held firmly bound unto SPOKAidE COUI1tY, WASHII1GT011 as Obligee, in the fuli and just sum of TWO THOUSAND ONE 'r'iUNDRLD TWEIdiY '1'iiREE Ar1D NO/ lO0TtiS Dollars 2, l 23 . 00 for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administra- tors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmiy by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principal entered into a contract with SPOKAPTE COUNTY, WASHITdGTON dated OC'rOBER 7, 1996 for RIVERWALK SUnDIV'LIS IOI1, 2ND & 3RD ADDITIONS P-14 14A AP1D P-14 I4B WHEREAS, said contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of OY1E year(s) after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the owner, against atl defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period, and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was approved on APRIL 20, 1999 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within ONE year(s) from the date of approval of the said contract, the work done under the terms of said contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said contract oi, it sha)l appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remai.;~ vin full force • and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. Signed and sealed this 18Tx day of 14AY . . i5 99 • Witness: K. C. COIISTRUCTIOid, INC. ~ . _ BY r • Mike Klika, PrPSidPnr Principal iiART ORD CASUALTY IP1S RAidCE i.0I1PA1:Y • r By. • ' OANidE TOi;Al1I Attomey-in-Fact BOP•2308 4/94 . ~ ORD CASUAL~TY INSURANC~E C~►NY , ' . - _ _ ~ . . - : , - EXECUTIVE OFFICE:'Hartford, Connecticut,-' . - - = . . ' _ _ . + . . POVII,ER OF ATTORNEI( . , ~ ' _ Know all men by these Presents, That the, HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE, , COMRANY, a corporation .duly organized under the laws of the -State of Indiana, and liaving its Ececutive Office in theCiTy of Hartford, County of Hartford, State ot •Connecticut, does hereby make, constitute and appoint ! W. W. WEZLL*, D11VNEEN, GEORGE C. SCHROEVEOR, LOtSS, TF[-ijART fO.ANNETONANI a,rid C,HRIS I,ARSON of SPOKANE, WASH'INGT0IV' its.-true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact, with full! power and authority, to each of said Attomey(s)-in=Fact, in,their separate capacity if more ` thjan; one, is named above, to sign, execute and acknowledge any amd all bonds and undertakings-a°nd other.writings o6hgatory irn the . . naturethereof on ~behalf oi the Company sin:its business of guaranteeing the,fidelity of persons tiolding'places of public or privaie trusf; , . guaranfeeing the performance or contraets otlier than insurance policies; -guaranteeing the perFormance of` insurance coniracts where' - surety,bonds are aocepted by states and-municipalities, and executing o~ gaaranteeing ponds and ,und'ertakings required o,r perm'itted in , _ all actions or proceetlings or by 'IauV allowed, and ,to bindi THE,IMARTFQRD, CASUAL7Y INSWRANC6 0OMP~A.NY-thereby as fully and to ~ the same eztent as if such bonds and undertakings and other'vuntings",obligatory.in the nature thereof weria signed by an Ececutive Officer'-oP the HARTFORD CASUA_LTY jINSURANCE COMPANY and sealed andi attested by one other of such Officers, and hereby ~ _ ~atifies and confrms all that its said Attomey(s)-in-Facf may do in Ipursuancehereof. This_ power of attomey is granted under and by authorit~r_of the, following Resolutioms ado~pted' by the Board of Directors of the HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting d`uly called and held on the 15th day, of June„ 1988, ~ RE50L,V,EO, that ; the~'P,resident or any_ Vice-Pr 'ent; actirig~ with any ~See?eta "ry -or Assistant Secretary; shall ~ia'v_e power and authority to ' .,,appolnt,; for ~ u, ses o~l," oF executin and~ attestin bonds,~and undettakin Tantl other~writin-s obii-ato imthe inature+;fheieof, one or more'Resident s~',~~ P _ Y 9 ~ 9 - - _ 9 R 9 9 ~Y ~ ,,~Vice-Presudents, Resident'Assistant Secretaries and Atlorne'ys-in-fact and at ime to, remove any such, Resident Vice-President; Residenf Assistant= • ' Secretary, or Att ome,y-in-Fact, and re'voke the powet and authontygNen to him: - ' • . . . . _ , . . . . , . An6rneys-io-~Fact~ sFiall 'have ;power and aDthority, gubje_'ct~t'otthe'le~ms~ and, limita`tions of' the power o,f atto_rney ~ssued to them, to execute and - ~ deliver on,behalf of the ~Company'and to attach the seal of~'the Company thereto any and a9l~bonos, arid undertakings, and other`writings obligatoryimthe nature thereo~; and '_a_ny f"uch. instt~iment executed by an,y `such Attorney-in-Fad shall'be as'bincPi~'g`upon -the Corr►pany as if signed'by an Exec~itive Ofiicer and sealed and attestecb,y one_other of such Offi'cers. _ -i_ . • . ~ • , , : , : . - ` - RESOLVED, fhat, whereas~ the President or anyVioe-,PresiAni,„acting .with,a~y Secretary or As§isCant Secretary, has the power and aulhori~y,ito ju appoint by a powe~r,of~ atiomeyy, for purposes only oP executfpgi a~id itEesting,bon&&, an'dl~undertakings, and ofher wrifings obligatory in the ~nature ther`eot, one oP more Reisde-nt Vice-Presidents, Assistant Secretaries and Attomeys-in-Fact~•. . ' ' Now,thereforea, dhe^signatures of such Officers aqd the seaVoi'the C_omp~ny_maybe affixed to any such power of attomey or lo any certificate . y . relating thereto by facsGmile, and _a.ny such power of attorney or'certifcate beanng,sueh.tacsfmle signatures or fac`si'mile seal shall be valld and7tiinding ' upon the Company and any s'uch powers0ezec,uted~ a0eerllfred by facsimile s`ignatuPes and facsimile seal shalU be'valid and b'indingi upon the, Cornpany ` in the future with respect to any bond,or undertaking to which it. [s at`tacheii;. . _ . : . ' - ' InWitness YHhereof~, the H'ARTFORD CASUAL'TY'4N~URANCCs;FA~iYiha's'caused these presents to be signed' by'~ts.Vice-. P~esident, and' its corpofate seal to-be hereto affixed', duly attesied by':its ~ ~CONI S'gcreta`ry, this;lst day of May, 1895. . ~ Aftest: - - - :~HARTFORD CASUALIY INSURANCE• CaMPANY . . _ . , _ _ • . - , l' . - - - - • • ?~*ro U , - • . - - ''s iR1Gflard R. Fbrrninson. - _ , r _ , . , SBC/g1wy STATE OF CONNECTiCUT .•Sr~:«'.~ N•''.. _ - _ • . . ~ _ ' ' ' , • . _ ' ' - . Paul L. Marabella - ' ~ COUNTY OF HARTFORD . . ` ` Vrce-President , . . On this ist day of May, A.D. 1995, before• me; personally, came,Raul L.`Ma~abella,~to.me,known, who being by me duly sworn,:did,depose - .-,and say:_thai he,resides in the County of Hartfard. Sfaie of Conne_,cticut~that he is•the V1ce-Rlesident of the'HARTFQRD CASUAL'fY _ . INS,URANC~'COMt?ANY, the corporation described.in and,which execut.ed..~lhe'above~instrument; that he knows the seal of thie'said corporationy that the• seal' affixed~ to the, said instnime'iit is 'such,,corporate,'sealAhJt itf was; so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of _ , •,~f, ~ said corporation .and that he signed his name thereto by like ord'er. - ~ : - • , ' , +HM~oj, ~ ; . , , • , , _ , r ="'~+.4y : y'" ~ t - • ~ - _ _ ~L - , fi,, -ddw -STATE OF• CONNECTICUT ss. ° pUBl:w Jean M_ Wo2niak - ' .COUN?Y OF HARTFORD - . ' _q~`-~~` • ' ` - 'NataryPublic - . • ' _ ' My, Cominission" Expires Juna 30. 1999 _ ~ , _ . _ • CERTIFICATE.-= 4--C . x: 'r. ~ ; „ • • - - _ ' ~ - I, ihe und'ersigned, 8ecretary of the HARTFORDPCA~SU,AL~TY'iINSUR'ANCE"COMPA NYn, Indiena Corporation,'00 HERE~BY-~ ~ fwll forceNand,has, not been revoked; ,and furthermore, that g d aNached P01NtR OF'ATTORNEY_ remains in' - - CERTII~Y tFiat-the"foreoing an ~-a - _ , the Resolutions of the. Board of Qirectors, set forth in the Power~jof HAttomeysiare, now•in~~'orce. • _ ' ~ - 1 ,,~!=i.' 3h~.N Signed "and sealed at the City of Hartford. ed~tf%-- l,$` H~ ` day of 14AY 19 99 . • . : , . '~-`s` : , , ' ' -}!e~ P-0 " A . - ~ . • . =:t . - - i' • , i - ' - Robe`r,f1L. Pbst . , . . • 'Secretsiy • _ . ` - - . , , ' . e , .Forrn $-3507-9 (HC) Printed in U.S.A. - " _ , ' _ A~@l•rI" .xC '`e » _ ~ < . _ - s_ . . t. r~.n.`!~tl~`K': y - f' ' "s . y_ • ~ ..n.i ~ ^ ' . " _ _ - . :l • " ' ' ~ . s. -a ' . . 'D ~ S P O K A N O U N T Y DNIS[ON OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBL.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer May 7, 1999 Mr. Mike Klika . • KC Construction Company P.O. Box 1455 . Hayden Lake, Idaho 83837-1455 RE: Bond Release for Riverwalk 2"`' & 3rd Addition and Warranty Bond - P-1414A & P-1414B Dear Mike: Spokane County accepted Indiana Avenue for maintenance and inclusion in its road system as a pubtic road on April 20, 1999. We need to release your performance bond number 341266 from Hartford Insurance Group that is currently in force on this project and r•eplace it with a Warranty Bond. The Warranty Bond should run from Aprii 20, 1999 for a one year period in the amount of $ 2,123.00, i am enclosing a copy of a-bond form we have accepted for a warranty bond. As soon as we receive the warranty boud, I will fax Hartford Insut•ance group with a hond release authoi'I27t1011. If you have any questions, please contact me at 509-456-3600. Thanks Sincerely, . . Bill Hemmicigs, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: Bond File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(5d9) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 Q. ~3v r~14~v5 DATE: MARCH 10, 1998 31 TO: ROB BINGER, PROSECUTERS FR . ~ OM. JIlVI RADKE, ENGINEERS RE: RIVERWALK 2r1D ADDITION: ACTION ON ROAD IlVIPROVEMENT BOND Dear Rob, I need help Question: Can the County legally take action against Hartford Insurance Group Roadway Improvement Bond #341266. I am transmitting you a copy of the letter I sent to the developer of Riverwalk 2nd Addition regarding taking action on the referenced bond. I am not entirely sure that the language in the bond allows the County to do this at this time. It is a bit funky. The project plans were approved on October 31, 1995. The project was originally bonded by the developer via a cash set aside letter dated June 7, 1996. The project was substantially constructed during the 1996 construction season. Then the developer was able to somehow persuade the contractor that he had hired (KC Construction) to put up a bond to replace his cash set aside. KC Construction put up a bond that combined $39,726.14 worth of bond amount on this project and $2,743.00 on Riverwalk 3`dAddition that KC Construction was also building for this developer. The Hartford Insurance Group issued a bond to KC Construction (Principal) signed October 2, 1996 referencing a substantial completion date of October 1, 1996. There is also another signed bond form that is in our standard format. This one references a completion date of 2 years....... but it neglects to say 2 years from when. So, the bottom line on this project is that everyone wants it done, and not to drag out for another year or two. Can the County take the bond? ~ ~ . . II . . S P O K A N E DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF T William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer ~ I April 14, 1997 - Mark Hancock Stanton DevelopmentJDean Housely Company ~ 16720 N.E. 116th Street ~ - - Bellevue, WA 98052 SUBJECT: P1414 - Riverwalk P.U.D. lst Addition Bond Reduction ~ Gen mea: As you recall, our lett.er of December 9, 1996 indicated that the County would agree to consider the drywells and associated piping at the east end of Indiana as par[ of the work for Riverwalk 2nd Addition. This was conditioned on revising the Riverwalk 2nd surety accordingly. As we discussed on April l lth, we have reviewed the surery for both Riverwalk lst and Riverwalk 2nd for any overlap. It appears tYiat some of the items in Ponds "A" and "C" of Riverwalk 2nd are essentially the same as were bonded for on Riverwalk lst. We are therefore revising the surety amount that needs to be added to the surety for Riverwalk 2nd. I.nstead of increasing the Riverwalk 2nd surery by $15,700, it appeaxs that the surety should be increased by $8,850. This will provide surety for the drywell work, to include lids, gravel backf'ill, and filter fabric, as well as the installation and Record Drawings for the irrigation systems in these ponds As we discussed on 5 Dec 96, there are irrigation systems required for the swales along Indiana and Mission Avenues; surety was not provided for these items, as there were no irrigation system plans available at the time the road and drainage plans were approved. . Please let us lrnow, in writing, when the surety for Riverwalk 2nd has been adjusted to include the drywells from Riverwalk lst and the irrigation systems. Proof of the surety adjustment will be needed prior to the County's acceptance -of the roads and drainage facilities in Riverwalk 1 st. Very truly yours, , W illiam A. Johns, P. E. . Spokane County Engineer - . ~lGt. , . _ . . . . Edward . P , r., P.E. . ~ , Plan Review Engineer . . • - cc: project file, reviewer • . ' . ' . . • , • • ~ . , , , . _ . . c 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 • (509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 , _ , . . . , _ ' ' y' . _ . - ' ' r ' . . • ' . - , - , , - ` _ , -e n ; ; - . , - , , . , , , . _ ' • _ _ . . . . , . . • . ' . • _ ' , ' ' A - . t• , : . ~ . , ` ~ .1 ~FJ~ Sedgwick Sedgwick James of Washington, Inc. ' 601 West Main, Suite 1400, PO Box 2151, Spokane, Washingion 99210-2151 Telephone 509 358-3900. Facsimile 509' 358-3937 R~~~~IVED October 14, 1996 0 C T Ed Parry SPOKANE CUUNTY EPJGlPJEER r Dave Bertow~ , Spokane C unty Publ,i~~'F~~orks Engineering Ro-ad-Division 1026 W. Broadway , Spokane, WA 99260 . Re: K. C. Construction, Inc. Subdivision Bond for Riverwalk 2nd & 3rd Additions Gentlemen: Enclosed please find in duplicate a rider we have issued changing the bond number for the subdivision bond we issued for K. C. Construction, Inc. Please sign the duplicate copy of this rider and return it in the enclosed self addressed stamped envelope. The original is for your f ile . If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thank you. Sincerely, ^ C ~ 71.. ~,•L '~i~ ~~2•-rt.-rt..< /J ~nne Tonani . ond Department Encl. Insurance Broking Risk Services Employee Beneiits r . 40 The Hartford Insurance Group Hartfo: d Plaza Hartford, Conneccicut 06115 RIDER To be attached to and form part o~ Bond Number509428$ executed by K. C. CONSTRLJCTION, INC. - a s P r i n c i p a 1, a n d HARTF'ORD F I RE I NSUrRANCE C0MPANY a s S u r e t y, • i n f a v o r*o f SPOKANE COUNI'Y and d a t e d OCMBER ? , 19 96 . In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is hereby agreed that: " THE BOND NUMBER BE CHANGED FROM: 5094288 . T'ne attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements, limitations and conditions except as herein exprzssly modified. This rider shall become effective as of the 7TH day of 0CTOBER 1996, Signed, sealed and dated this 14TH day of OC."MBER 1996. THIS RIDER ACCEPTED ON JQ5C 19~ SPOKANE COtJNrY, WA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC Wl')RKS ENGINEERING/ROADS DIVISIDN HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE OOA'1PANY BY BY ~ ~-/n s~ < C~~A / ' Attorney-in-Fact liJoANNE TONANI r ~ 1 ~ Bond No. 5094288 ROADwAY IIb[[PROVEIME1vT.BOND I4'vOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. (developer), as "Principal," and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of che Scace of Connecticut ~ and authorized to transact a surety business in t6e State oE Washington, as "Surety," are held and firmly bound unto Spokane Counry, a poliacal subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum oE . FORTY-'I'WO :rHOUSAND FOUR HUIVDRED SIXTY-NINE AND 14/00-- ~t Dollars 42,469.14 fawful money of the Uaited State of American, for the payment of which the Principal aad Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointty and severally, firuily by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is the developer of a tract of land in Spokane Counry known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS • and being located in Section 08 , Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., in Spokane Counry, Washington, and said County has required that a boad be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the construction cost of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, drainage control and/or paving of roadaays adjacent to said development, and such other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, all ia accordance with Spokane County Road Department speci6cations, aad to the satisEaction of the Spokane County Engineer; such improvements to be completed two (2): years or less time unless said time period be extended at the optioa of the Spokane County Engineer. . Upon failure of Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the tune authorized, and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surery, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the extent of this Bond 13e obligatioa oE this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. Surety bereby waives all rights to release from the obligatioo except as herein stated. SIGNED AND SEALED tlus 7th dav of October ~ 19 96 , K.C. Construction, Inc. 7inciPrpal B Y: , . Hartford Fire Insurance Company • Sure B Y: . Lois Stewart, Attorney-in-Fact (Ticte) ~'~~~P 1_""_~-,TFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMP' , Hartfonl, Connecticut POWER OF ATTORNEY Know all men by theae Preaents, That the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a oorporation duy organized under the laws of the State of Connedicut, and hav(ng Rs principal offtce in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford, State of Connedicut, does hereby make, oonstitute artd appoiryt W. W. WELLA RICHIIRD W. t1MRRILIh WM. DIlVNEEN, CHARLESH. STZILEN, GEORGE C. SCHROEDA LOIS STEWART, LINDA 77CHE}; CARLA HOLT, fOANNE TONANI and RNONDA A. NELSON of SPOKANB, WASHINGTON its true and lawful Attomey(sHn-Fad, with fuli power and authoriiy to each of said Attomey(s)4n-Fad, in their separate capaaty if more than one is named above, to sign, execute and adcnowledge any and all bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof on behaff of tfie Campany in its business of guarerneeing the fldelity of persons holding places of public or private trust; guaranteeing the perfarmance of contrads other than insurance poliaes; guaranteeing the perfortnance of insurance contrads where surety bonds are aooepted by states and muniapatities, and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in all adians or prooeedngs or by law allowed, and to bind the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as futly and to the same eactent as if such bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof were signed by an Enewtive Officer of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and sealed and attested by one other of such Officers, and hereby ratifies and confirms aIl that its said Attomey(s)-in-Fed may do In pursuance hereof. This power of attomey is granted by and under authority of the following provisions: (1) By-Laws adopted by the Stockholders of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meetirtg dufy called and held an the 9th day of March,1971. ARTICLE IV SECTION S. The Prosident or any Vloo-PresideM, ading with arry Secretary or Asststant Secretary, shell have power and auttmrfy to appofnt, (or purposes only of executing end attesting bonds and undenakings and ather wriUngs obligatory In the nature thereof, one or rtwre Resident Vioe Presiderrts, Residerrt Assistant Secrotaries and Attomeys-in-Fad and at any dme to remove any such Resident vice-PresideM, Resident assistarrt Seaetary, or Attomey-in-Fad, and revoke the power and suthorfty given to him. SECTION 11. AKcmeya-in-Fad ahatl have power and authority, subjed to the tertns and limitations of the power of attomey issued to them, to enearte and def'nrer on behaM of the Company and to attach the seal of the Company thereto arry and all bonds and undeAakinga, and oMer writfngs obligatory in the naturo thereot, and any such instrumerrt executed by eny such Attomey-in-Fett ahall be es binding upon the Company es N algned by en ExecuWe Offioer and seafed and attested by one other of such OfBars. This power of attomey is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the fo0awing Resofution adopted by the Diredors of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly called and held on the 12th day of February, 1993. aeaoMea, tAac ft aipnarim d auch ortfcera ana ft aeal a tl,e Cornpany may ee amzed co any aud, power & aecaney a co er►y certincate reWnp axrelo ey fxskmile, and any wch powe► d attomey a certificate bearfV aucfi tapimile slgnaWres or tacaimib seal atW be vatid and Oind'np upon the Company wd mry auch povrer so exsearted and aerdlfed by tee,ttmib aigraturos arW facalmfb aeai atiap be valid and b3ndrp upon the CampanY In the tuhae wMh respect Eo arW bond ar undertakinp Eo wNcA Et b ettacl~ed. In Witneas Whereot, the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its voo- President, and its corporate seal to be hereto affaed, duly attested by its Secretary, this 1 st day of May, 1995. Atbst HARTFORD F1RE INSURANCE COMPANY fikherd R. Henttarmon ~ . . ~ SoaohrY STATE OF CONNECTICUT Paul L. Marabella COUMY QF NARTFORO Vce-Pmsjdent On this 1st day of May, A.D. 1995, before me personally came Pau1 L. Marabella, to me knovm, who being by me duty swam, did depose and say: that he resides in the County of Hartford, State of Connec6cut; that he is the voe-President of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporatPon described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seal of fhe said corporation; that the ssai affixed to the said inshument is such corporate seal; that it was so affuced by order of the Board of Diredors of said corporation and that he signed his name thereto by like order. otW'4 STATE OF CONNECTICUT COUNTY OF HARTFORD Jem AWtary H. Wm~t Wy c.ommissio~~va~.xum so. t ~e CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, SQCretary of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connedicut Corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in full farce and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the Resolutions of the Board of Diredors, set forth in the Pawer of Attomey, are now in force. SigRed and sealed at the Gty of Hartford. Dated the 7th day of OCtO}J2Y' 1996 " • I ` . ~ ~ go. . ~•s Robot L Poe SeCraESfy Form 5-3507-9 (HF) Ptinud 'm U.SA. ~ r , . : ~ r~,~ ~ a A~}k. ,±,itViv~ ~p'^ ?rr'~~ r`''~I M.'~'~*44~+'~1' Z+'~ '~9P~'i+~.: • ii fle- a;"` ~ • N• , ~ ~ . ~A ~ . ~ ,~'r •K _ ~e .~~,J , ~ . " t ~ . _ 'i 1'. . ..~Sa..si. ~c, ~ ' ' ~.'~Y~.i+. ° t. 1'~ ~ ^.1V,'~~ '~Sxtr~;"-~ ' 4 .a~ ~'~"9.i~ ` r! ~ ~ , . r } ~ y ,r ~ j~ _ ` .'yY►.J• _A 3 ' ~ ¢ rf~--'' • _ K r _ " ' . < ~J ' -f. •r ~ r~ ~ ~i:` ~1.~~.~ . ~a~ AC' c '-4~ t4*, .r ~6 _ ~ t. t ~ W ~ ..~~~T°•~ ~ ~•R •ln~~ `M.•~ ~"f^ ~"d~r:~ ' Mti` •~,X•! ~~~~y+_~R~.';'. ;4 ..a-~~ G ~I ' i~~ _ c. ~ . r~. ~ ,y• ~l~" ~ y ' e r t ~ ~-y Y. , j ~ ~ • : ~ x , , j `r s ,G '~~C~~ -y~{~ i-~ ~ . 4" 4~ . . j~ i t ~F' f ~ . ' ~~`y~ . ♦ , '~4 . .c. •JS~~q ~ - .r ,~i ~Y'„t~+ ~ t'S' ~~i~...y~ ' - Y~.'~.~'~~:'~'~` ~'yt~~~ 7'JCKi, y . : . - 1 • _ ,~e ~ ' ~ . ~ . ' . r. ~.~~~M~ k ~ y ~y*, h. ,~,-'Td ~r. . . - ~~M r , . f,~~ t ' - 1f- ~ r ~ ~ ~ { ' _ ~t~~'~,~ •1^~.' » ' - . .;~~y.. ;,t. ~t - _ • = - ' ~ - Bond No. ~ 5094288 s ~ - - ~ , . . , - - ~ ~ - The ~ H a~rtf o~~ ~r c~±liis ra ce G'roup •-t - - Harcford PIaza • ~ - ^ - . ; . . Hartford, Connectlcut 06115 ~ SUBDIVISION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND , ~ . ~ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. (CONTR.ACTOR), as "Principal", and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, as "Surety", are held and fum~ly bound unto Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of . Washington, as "Obligee", in the penal sum of FORTY-TWO THOUSAND, FOUR HLTNDRED ~ SJXTY NINE & 14/100 DOLLARS ($42,469.14), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally fumly by these presents. WTEREAS, said Principal is a contractor to the Developer of a bract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into lots and known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS, and being' located in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required ' ~ that a bond be fiunished in. an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs of grading and surfacing to the approved grades and typical section of the roadways of said Plat and the instailation of drainage structures and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with the Contract Documents between Principal and Developer dated September 6, ~ 1995, and those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications and plans dated October 31, 1995, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer. Such improvement reached substantial completian on or about October 1, 1996; however, such date may be extended at the option of the ~ Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time . authorized, arid upon delivery of the written notice thereof of Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall be obliged to the Obligee up to the'penal sum of this Bond. . . The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the _ Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be . given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. . SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 2ND day of October, 1996. PRINCIPAL ~ SURETY ~ K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. HARTFORD FIRE 1NSURANCE COMPANY ~ ~ . By: . By: . ` , , . ~ Its Pres,~ deh W.W. WELLER, Attorney-in-Fact ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . G I kA' C~ ~ • - , OFFIC.E OE THE COUNfiY ELYCIHEER SFd~ ~OUNTY, WmINGTON . . TO: JIlyi AADRE F'RCM: DAVE BERTO DATE: October 3, 1996 BUBJECT: BOND P1414P. & P1414C RIVEF.WALK 2r1D & 3P.D Th~ bor.d tor the above mefltioned proj er t~ is fur the following If.PmJ : 1) All the itPm3 on the approved road and drair.age plan: with the eYCepti,,n ot the sod tc,L• tllp- 11208`► Swales. 2} A bond 133t1t'd b1/ H2.rtford Insuranc? Croup October 2,1996 13 fur bc.tll plats. $39, 726.14 -For RivPr-walk 2:!1D 743 . 00 Eor Riverwalk 3Pwn c : \wpdoc\dave`ra6_r~a\itpms • . ~ l i S P O K A N E ` .C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBI.IC WORKS DEPARTMFNT William A. johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director i i f~. L L''~'.~.•!•~ 11JtjC, ttr. , F'•~11 a', ~ta:':. EJ kr tr ; r,o,1a' -aa B. __;./1.? _1_\r r • ~L. I ~ N 1 ~ CL • r ~ ~ _ u ~ _ ~ ~ • ~ ~ P 14 14 A 11- :i 'j;.~s~ii_ =~i's-J~~~~ t:~'.ii•= L• . r , .C.~' 1. : :Z~ u i~il•~ r L' r~r Fu. ni-i !•tjc1~ i_ - i~ r+:~ r ~ r~11_~ t'• 't{, jti r'~ _ i s r=. ; ~ t~ L' i t,•:~ - ~ r. i ; ` _ ~ i. rp 0 i? t~ .n a ~ y+ • L_'L~~ lr ~~l LlL T1~.l~QL~ e 1al. 5. 1 l~%Z. l+ l.e dL'~,J 1'•L :~r4.r . n:.~=_.~:~ n;~- ^ f ~ -9 ~ n ~ 'n '"I rv ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~i T. l j ~ ti r~ ' = ~ +r}~ - r . ~ • = ~ ~ r. ~ • L i f•~f . . ~ .'•7 r ~i • C ~ ~.F~ -r ~ ~ • ~ ~~..~,~r` ~P.7 ~ ' 1 v.~1 T ~^,1 1 ~ ~ •,1 r,`.1; _ •s v .r•.._:~~~ i • ~a : ~ ~i••~ ~ ! : T i ~ r~ r - ' ~c ' ' • ~ ' ~ ' ' L• _4 J ~ ~ IL~~.~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ V ~~•r l ~ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3165 09/09/96 12 : 47 FAX 206 869 6620 DEAN/HOUSI.EY LLC [a001 FAX MElVIO September 9, 1996 TO: Dave Berto, Spokane County Engineering . FROM: Mark Hancock, Dean Housley RE: Bonds, Riverwalk Development Dave - We have received a copy of the bond that KC Construction proposes to use for the roads/storm work at Riverwalk (2nd & 3rd Additions), and a copy is "attached" for your review. Unfortunately, the bonding company has changed the wording (partly I thirilc because the work is complete), but at least it is an excellent company in Hartford Insurance and hopefully language can be found that is acceptable to the County and to them. While the dollar figures match, I have pointed out to Mike Klika at KC Construction that he would need to put roads on a separate bond from sewer, that it vvould be for 2 years, and that we would want him to prepare separate bonds for the various projects to make it easier to process them as each one expires. You had mentioned that the County Attorney's office will need to review this, so we would appreciate it very much if you could have them proceed with their review ASAP. If they have any questions, I can be reached at 206/869-6618, ext. 234, and Mike Klika of KC Construction can be reached at 208/765-3909 (and Sedgwick Iames in Spokane will handle the bond for him with Hartford). ~ Thanks a lot for your help, 2 . ~t r, . a ~ PS: We have also asked Jim Legat to have them review this forin for sewer bonds 09/09/96 12:47 FAX 206 869 6620 DEAN/HO[JSLEY_ LLC @002 ~ • 14A.INTIIHANCII a0po . ~ON~Q N,,,o• S094288 . . - ~+w.~.. ~a~roM1, At~. MEN ey ?t Mse PR93eMM IAas v* X. ~y o Ind .~u iv~~ w h~~d ar►a nrn~ Ooun4 unao t ..i i.~ .~..r r ~ a~Q~. ~fl ~ ~1 ~ ~ . ..~~r VHS HUM= TEN XV 14/10 mo mu.ow ~ ~r~~l r~•~. ~ ~1 ~ _~1~~ ~ ir .I COtLARS~ t N1 ~rton~ d 1h~ U~t~d ~aea d Art~~t~ 1o b~ psld ~ th@ 90 001199v, iR 6vM668wo or sUVW !of whkh prYMO14 well and uuty 0e +e+aWe, We and Soh ol ull do lytft bina owsakaa. ev► aAd suh of our hein. unuter% aQm~ldra~. w0o~r~ore anA wtorA 1plntty artd &rv.ridilr. AnNY Oy :lsoN pruqMs; . aEALEn w1tA W serts ina d"d o+4 ~ SIII " 1 .....~d+4► oL 96 e . W KEROAS. tN saTd 'dt+dRd ha offtrod 10 a corwM with i.ZMrm,._ CM4*M~GMtM TAnTNPR, SX OW BU1T+DZM D0~ltZ~O~I~'Mo . WAAP D~P'.AN.- Z'D!w RIVFPtAL1c W AND 3O • S~It AND JOilDS/WZCM wOtlC . ~ ~ an ~}~ALi7~~ ENM ~wr • NCW►'TVMOALO T'HE MNOM0N OF Tttts 43Ltt1ATi0N iS iutHe tha! M the Ud ROnela,u shd WMNy Vfd bob hanifts uw Wo deftpt• trorn ana asaMn a1 101L oo" damapt and txpome wt+abonm xhkh K enty suitsr & b* com o1led b msaon oi lsi1L o of tho aaid Adnttpal to *p iiid work {n ripalt lot •YSr Orba p"lntoftg Z916 aQatnat 4 rb d,~ti=[o of fau~y weuhtp a bderw rMti~l. ~.n rh'r obnoIlton shati ~ vo1a: oshatwts~ to nn~etn In t~lt iom ~l sn , ~AO ~liitl. . ~ ' . . R- ,C. ior ~t . . ~.r.... , il~1l~L~RD ~'I~ I OC~+~~ItrK . a... . . ~ ~ as w~ , .r► OFFICE 4F Z'AE COIIDiTY ZNGIbiEER SPaSOM covNrY , WMxIN(;Tam To : J114 RxnHE MCK:DAvE E=vD' IIATE : J'Une 211 l 9 9 6 9UBJECT :?OND ITEMS Pl-4143 RIVEFWP.LK ?rID JU-D Tha bond ~or the above mentiuiied project i3 for tha tul~ uwiiiy . i) A11 t.he item3 on t.he apprnved road and drainage plan~, wpdo~ ~ ddve~ mPmo- ~ i t Auqm. , . . 1 . ~ SEAF/RST • Douglas B. Sollitt Vice President Builder Banking ' June 7, 1996 Mr. Bill Johns Spokane County Engineer _ 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Ref: Developer/Borrower: Stanton-Spokane. L.P. Our Loan No.: 8467777703-26 Funds in the amount of $39,726.14 are being set-aside in a construction loan in the name of Stanton-Spokane, L.P. (developer/borrower), et ux, in lieu of a bond, for ihe purpose of assuring completion and installation of roadway surfacing, including clearing and gravel, storm drainage and monuments in Riverwalk 2nd Addition {development} in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's Office on October 31, 1995. No funds will be disbursed from this set-aside withoui the prior written authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of funds will not be revoked without the consent of the County Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above-named improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not accomplished wiihin a period of one year from the date of this agreement. All funds remaining in the set-aside will be forfeited to the County of Spokane upon written request by the Spokane County Engineer's Office to BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, successor by name change to SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association. It is understood and agreed that upon the forfeiture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve (12) months from ihe date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood and agreed that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against Stanton-Spokane. L.P. (developer/borrower) named above. Seafirst Bank shalt be under no liability for non- completion of the work, its obligations being expressly limited to holding and disbursing the set-aside funds as agreed in the agreement. It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, successor by name change to SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance of the above-named improvements. Seafirst Bank Builder Bankmg/Real Estate Cenler/10500 N.E. Eighth Street, Suite 400/6ellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone (206) 585-6462 FAX (206) 585-6475 SEAf'r?ST ACCEPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of June. 1996. STANTON-SPOKANE L. P., a Washington limited partnership By: DEAN-HOUSLEY, L.L.C. a Washington limited liability company General Partner By : DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington corporation Member By: P. Edward Dean, President J Brian Housley Member SEAFIRST BANK ~ , ~ By: Douglas ~ Soilitt Vice President OFFlCE OF THE SPbKMIE COUNTY ENGINEER B G • ' . y: v ItS: • > > . . , . 1ST BOND REDUC IUN n.i:.avr-r_. . . _ ' . ' ~-w• . _ rrra:rerve-r~vns•-.-nc-wo..nr.sr.rr.n.rrc-rr.• . . srrir+..w._'. PRQJEGT P1414A RIVEFtWALK-4R"pp NA.ME 9AVEBERTO DATE o5-Jun-96 . DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE CUST 1} C3rywell- Type A0 25% E A 0.~5 1250_(}0 31 2.50 2) Dryvvefl - Type B@ 25% _A 0.75 1M.00 1237.50 3) Grate - Type 1(D d5% EA t 315.00 315.00 4) QtWe Type 2Q 25% EA 05 340,OA 170,00 5) C3rate - Type 4 EA 300.00 0.00 6) Rackfil) Fvr OW @. 2596 CV 35 16,00 5w,00 7) Camm4e inkt (D 25% EA 15 750.00 1125.00 8) C.M. Pipa 10" Dfa. LF 27.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. (D 25% LF 40 27.00 1080.00 10) C.M_ Plpe 15" Dta. LF 27.80 0.00 11} C.M. Pipe 1$" DIa. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Preeast Mantxole EA 15UU.00 0.00 13) ao►~~d lia ~ 25% F, A 310.00 0,00 14) Ditchr208 Excsvattan q 1009f, GY 550 10.00 550A,00 15} Scsd @ 100% SF 6250 0,70 4375.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1)SIdewalk !nM (W!lben Vautt) @2250% EA 0.75 700.00 52) 5.0 0 2} Curb Inl~t & Apr4n (D ?.596 FA 0,25 200.00 50,0() 3) CPE Pipe i 2" @ 2596 SF 15 15.40 225.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0_00 DRA1NAGE SUBTOTAL 15475.00 16) Manuments Q i O(,}9F, EA 5 185.00 925.00 17) BarRCACie LF 33,00 0,00 16} Stteet Signs C 100'N, EA 2 85,00 170,00 C)TMF-R SUaTOTAL 1095.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDE1lVALK 19) Rough Qracle 0 259F, GY 307,65 10.00 3076.50 Top Cvume CY 16,00 0,00 21) sase Gautse Q 25% CY 205.1 16.00 3281.6A 22) Asphatt Concrete C 25% Tons 210.225 44.40 9333.89 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24j t:urb Type 8(D 25% LF 390.1 8.00 3120.80 25) ~urb Type R L r 8.00 0.00 26) SitlewoIk (D 259f, SQYD 2f0.075 16.70 4343.25 N4N-STANDIIRQ RCJAQ ITEMS . 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 al 0.00 _ C3RARING ANp SURFACINC3 23156,14 VSE $-39,~.OU !-nl~t;It•! TnT~11 r'lq 7~.~~ ~ . . ~ BOND ESTIMATE . PRQJECT P1414A RIVERWALK 2ND ADD NAME DAVE BERTa DATE 05-Jun-86 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNiTS QUANITY PRICE COST , 1) drywg _Tyl* A F-A 1 1~50.00 1250.00 2) Dry" _ Type g EA 3 1650.00 4960.00 3) C-inft _T~pe I EA 4 315.00 1260.00 4) c3nste Type 2 EA 2 340.00 680.00 Sj C3rete - Type 3 EA . 300.00 0.00 6) BackU For OW CY 16.00 0.00 _ 7) Concrete Inkl EA 6 750.00 4500.00 zd 8) C.M. Plpe 10" Dia. LF 23.00 0-00 9) C.M. Ripe 12" Dia. LF 160 27.00 4320.00 10) C.M. Pipa 15- Dia. LF 27.80 0.00 . 11) C.M. Pfpe 180 Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Rtecest tVwthole EA 1500,00 0.00 13) SoW fid EA 4 310.00 1240.00, 14) Qkfi/ZO'8 E=av$tiort CY 560 10.00 5600.00 ' 15) sw S F 6250 0.70 4375.00 JNON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1)Sidmatk IMet (Wltbeit Vaul) EA 3 700.00 2100.00 a~ Zj Curb Irdet & Apron E A 1 2 0 0. 0 0 2 0 0. 0 0 L~ 3) CPE Pipe 12" SF w 15.00 900.00 Z 5-. 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUB70TAL 31275.00 16? Monumerb EA 5 185,00 825.00 17) gBRicade LF 33.00 0.00 18) Street Sig~ EA 2 85.00 170.00 t,~v OTHER SUBTOTAL 1095.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK r 19) Rouytt Orade CY 1230.6 10.00 12306.00 Z6 Zp) Tap Oam CY 16.00 0.00 21) 6a9e Course CY 820.4 18.00 13126.40 2,) 22) psomk Corffft ToM 840.9 44,40 37335.96 z a 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Typs B LF 1580.4 8.00 12483.20 c-' c)~. 25) Ctub TVpo R LF 8.00 0.00 _Zg) gkkvmk SQ YD 1040.3 16.70 17373.01 Z 3 , NON-STANDARQ ROAO iTEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) . 0.00 4) 0.00 , C3RADINt3 AND SURFACtNO 82624.57 . 1 ICC !4"1C Af1A M • • ' ~ ~ , BONQ ESTIMATE .-rrr ~-.-..r.sr~.n.r.-..a..r. :.-.-.~.n'+_ ~n1.rr. ~vr*rrr.'..-..~mn--.... nM+NT~+lawl~+1APROJECT P1414/ti RIVERINALK 2NA ApD N./1ME A/1VEHERTQ A/1TE 015-.1un-9G DRAINAGE ITEMS UNtTS CtUANITY PRICE CUST 1) Dtyvvell - Tjrpe A EA 1 1250.00 1250.00 2) Drywel! - Type B EA 3 1650.00 4950.00 3) Grata - Type 1 EA 4 315.00 1264.00 4) Qtafe Type 2 F, A 2 340,00 W.00 5) Qrate - Type 3 F- A 300,00 0,00 6) Bwkfill For [)W eY 16,00 Q.W 7) ConcMe InM EA 6 750.00 4500.00 8) C.M. Pipe 1D" Dla. LF 23.00 0.00 9) C.M. Plpe 12" Dla. LF 160 27.00 4320.00 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. Lf 27_80 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Preca9t Manhofe EM 150U,00 0,00 13} Satid lid F, A 4 310.00 1240.00 14) Ditch/20$ Excewtion CY 550 10,00 5500.00 15) Sod SF 6250 0.70 4375.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1)Skkvvalk Inlet (lNilbert Vauft) EA 3 700.00 2100.00 2) Curb inlet & Aprvn FA i 200.0N0 200,00 3) CPE Pipe 12" , SF 60 15.00 900.00 4) . 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAiNAGE SUBTOTAL 31275.00 . 16) Manuments E A 5 165,00 925.00 17) Qarricade LF 33,00 Q,t)o 18) strcef signs EA 2 85.00 170.00 OT=t-1Ei: %SU6T'OT'AL 1095.00 GRADING, SURFACtNG, CURB, ANn SIDEWALK 19j Rough Qradg GY 12W.6 10.00 123M,D0 20j Top Courge CY 16,00 A,txJ 21) 6ase Caurse CY 820,4 16,00 13126.40 22) Asphalt Concfete T'ons 840.9 44.40 37335.96 23) Gurb TyRA A LF 7.00 0.00 24} Curb Type 8 LF 1560.4 8.00 12483.20 zs) curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 10403 16.70 17373.01 NaNaSTANDARQ ROAp ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) • 0.00 4) 0.00 4RADINC3 ANp SURFAClNt3 92624,57 USE $125,400,IX0 r,RawD TCaTAL 124,994.57 ~ BOND ESTiMATE PROJECT P1414A RNERWALK 2ND ADD NAME DAUE BERTU DATE 31 44sy-M DRAINAGE ITEMS . UNtTS QUANtTY PRICE COST 1) Dry+MeN - Type A ! EJe1 1250.00 0.00 I 250-vv 2) DryweY -'Type B 3 EA 1650.00 0.00 4c, y.~" 3) Grate - Typa 1 - 4 EA 315.00 0.00 ! Z~° 4) Qnste Type Z z EA 340.00 0.00 5) Grste - Type 3 EA 300.00 0.00 6} 68dO For OW CY 16.00 0,00 '7) Corxxeie Inlet ;~;EA 750.00 . 0.00 8} C_M. Pipe 1(" Dla . LF 23.00 0.00 - 9) C.M. P" 12" Qia. f(p° LF 27.00 0.00 4'320 1 d}-G.M. Pipe 15" Dia. . . LF 27.80 - 0.00 - . 11) C.M. P" 180 Dia. LF .31.50 0.00 - 12) Preca9i Manhole _ EA 1500.00 0.00 - 13) Sotid C~d 4- EA 310,00 0.001246 14} Dddhf108 Excetetiort 550 CY 10.00 0.00 Ssoo 15? Svd &ygo SF 0,70 0.00 a37s - Z ~-5 NON STANOARD DRAINAGE tTEMS 1) „vte7 (hi,~oe.c, IMut-1) 3ffi 0.00 2/ C,ttQB trlQ%t( ~ Ai~~~'~rl 1 tyi 0.~ 3) C'e F'ioE (RDS n- iz ~Z'` 4 &o t,F 0.00 4) 0.00 5} 0.00 6} 0.00 ORAINAGE SUBTdTAL 0.00 16} Manumeft EA 5 185,00 W5,00 17} Barticade LF 33.00 0.00 16) St~eet Siyra EA 2 85.00 170.00 dTHER SUBTOTAL t09.5.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rvuyh C3rade CY 1230.6 10,00 12306.00 20) TcQ Cww CY 16.40 0.00 21) Bm Cww CY 820.4 16,00 131 26.40 22) Asohur Concrete ToM 840.9 44.40 37335.96 23) Ctub Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24} +Curb Type B LF 1560.4 8.00 12483.20 25) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 25} Skkxwvk SQ YD 1040.3 16.70 17373.01 NON-.STANQARD RQAQ ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 a) 0.00 ~ ORADIND ANO SURFACINO 92524,57 GRAND TOTAL 93,719.57 . STREET 9UANTITIES PROJECT NO.- P1414A DESIGNER- DAVE BERTO DATE- 5/31/96 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- RIVERWALK 2ND ADD STREET # 1 NAME- INDIANA AVE LENGTN- 810.19 FT. WIDTH- 37.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 1157.02 ENDING STATZON = 1967.21 INTER # 1 FULL INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 42.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 . INTER # 2 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 50.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM MEASUREMENT OUANTITY SURFACE AREA- 33225. 76 S. F. ROADWAY ExCAVATION 1.00 FT. 1230.6 C. Y. ' CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.00 FT. 0.0 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.67 FT. 820.4 C. Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.33 FT. 840.9 TONS CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0.00 FT. PROPOSED 1560.4 FT. SIDEWALI{ ExISTING 0.00 S. Y. PROPCISED 1040.3 S. Y. TOTALS ROADWAY ExCAVATION 1230.6 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFAC I NG TOP COURSE 0.0 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE GOURSE 820.4 C. Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE . 840.9 TONS CURB TYPE 8 1560.4 FT. SIDEWALK 1040.3 S. Y. ~ SPOKANE COUNTY , CALCULATION SHEET 7FFtCE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS ~ Description: ~C C(~~'~,~.~~Z•k 24 ' ~-y,j} Pro1ect No.: Calc. by: Dote: Title: Checked by : Date : Sheet of Notes : ~ 7tit,--T fE~ flvof ~flk) 71?lot-4) ~ l~ 1/k q k~P4j -~dru , Y' I ✓ IJ ~QfeJl.r ~ iuflb 6) Wr,4. s(z3.~.~-u►. ef) 7ge, 1 ~3 z,,,q, vl ✓ F~(I 12"OV ~ 7 ~~c ~ - 2.e~.. ~ Z2l.J~ ✓ aE , . ~v E, 582 ~i. 2j 910~ Z3 L N, (1, / 1 y ~ PJAt s / .~c¢ , ~..1.✓ ~6 Gr . , . , , - . , ~ j . . ~ . : . . ; . . . . , . . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ • 1 ~ . ' ' ~ . SPOKANE COUNTY ~ ~1FFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS , . ~ ~ C CALCULATION SHEET J . Description: Project No.: Colc. by: Date: Title: Checked by: Date: Sheet of Notes : ~70 ~r4) ld;v 0. 4) Of,55 (3• k,) (G2~$ 73) 3 1063 14717 1030 Zv)- S >a 2 ft'4- ~ ~g 7'~ I - 6~- ✓ I ~pc ~ ~ra~ 4- r~ z /D-0 P~PF, !Z" Cw,P 22- t2-5-f ~-4-7 ~ 23 ISI =y r~~ ✓ ~Z" f4 DSp~Z Z2-t 3g ~a ✓ ~w a~ / ✓ ~-d~d C~~'a 4 e~ f ~w IlfiU~T,% INulf 3 . ✓ 1-~~x, ( (Atk ►nn45~ I . After Recording Return to: Spoka cnunty Engineer Attn: _Engineering Administration . . RESOLUTION NO. 99 0317 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF ESTABLISHMENT ) OF INDIANA AVENUE ) R E S O L U T I O N- RIVERWALK 1'~T, 2ND AND 6TM ADDITIONS ) E S T A B L I S H M E N T COUNTY ENGINEER' S ROAD FILE NO. 2659 ) No Assessor's Tax Pancel Number Assigned - Public Roadways This being the day set for the hearing on Spokane County Engineer's Report on the proposed establishment of INDIANA AVENUE, proceedings for which were initiated by PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION NO. 99-0229, and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that Notice of Hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the report and maps of the Spokane County Engineer and all claims and papers on file and after hearing aIl other evidence adduced at the hearing; and IT FURTHER APPEARING that the rights of way have been dedicated as public road 60 feet wide, and that said road is a public necessiry and the same should be opened and established as Counry road. . THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane Counry, Washington, ihat the hereinafter described road as reponed by the Spokane Counry Engineer on the 20th day of April, 1999, being more particularly described as follows: INDIANA A`'ENUE - 60* foot wide rigbt of way, from the east right of way line of Barker Road easterly to the westerly line in RivenwaIk 5' Addition. Located in the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M. and as shown by the records and maps on file in the Office of the Spokane County Engineer be and the same hereby is established as Counry road and the same shall be known as INDIANA AVENUE, Road File No. 2659. The road supervisor of the road district in which the said road is located is hereby directed to open and maintai.a the same for public use and travel. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the one foot strips described as follows are hereby dedicated for public road purposes: Tract "J" in Riverwalk 1" Addition No. 1414 Lot 2 Block 4 in Riverwalk 2nd Addition Na. 1414A Pa€e 2 Fstablish Indiana Ave. - RF 263V . Apri120, 1999 99 0317 APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 20th day of April, 1999. • o~ CoM1►uss BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS co~~ ~oy, p= SPP"tAN CPUNTY, WASHINGTON C.~ • h • N ~ r O ' ;T' • ~ / ~~ly', M. KATE c AS , CHAIR :'~'•.,s;~:.•'~♦ ATTEST: VICKY M. DALTO CLERK OF THE BO . JO OSKELLEY, VICE-C AI DANIELA ERICKSON, DEPUTY p P . S 1\v\res\est\rf2659.indiana ~ . ~ OFFIC,E OF THE CODNfiY ENQIM '.ER SFOKM COMM, ~EINGTON T4: JIlyi RADKP FROM: BAVE BERTO DAfiE : october 3, 1996 BUBsTECT: BOtVD P1414n & P1414C RIVEFTATRLK 2ND & 3kD Th~ bond for the above mefltioned projects is for the following iFem3: 1) A11 the item c1r the approved road and drainage plans with the es:ception vt ttlp- svd tor tho- 11208" Swales. Abond 133ued by Hartfard Insuranc? Crnup October 1996 - 13 toL' botli pla'Ls. $39, 7~6.I4 For R3vpr-walk 2ND $2, 74;3. 00 For RiverwaZk 3RD c : \wpdoc\dave\ra~~ca%items ^ ~11~ . . . , L ~II~ ' - Sedgwick Sedgwick James of Washington, Inc. 601 West Main, Suite 1400, PO Box 2151, Spokane, Washington 99210-2151 Telephone 509 358-3900, Facsimile 509 358-3937 RECEOVED october 14, 1996 OCT 15 1996 Ed Parry r Dave Bertow SPO~NE COUNTY EPJGINEER Spokane C unty Publ orks Engineering Division 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Re: K. C. Construction, Inc. Subdivision Bond for Riverwalk 2nd & 3rd Additions Gentlemen: Enclosed please find in duplicate a rider we have issued changing the bond number for the subdivision bond we issued for K. C. Construction, Inc. `Please sign the duplicate copy of this rider and return it in the enclosed self addressed stamped envelope. The original is for your f ile . If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thank you. Sincerely, J ne Tonani ond Department Enc 1 . Insurance Broking Risk Services Employee Benefits i / J • l_ , - ~ w1k, u The Hartford Insurance Group Hartfo: d Plaza Hartford, Conneccicut 06115 RIDER To be attached to and form part of Bond Number5094288 e:cecuted by K. C. CONSTRLlCTION, INC. - a s P r i n c i p a 1, a n d HAR'I'FORD FIRE INSURANCE L'ONPANY a s S u r e t y, in f avo r*o f SPOKANE COLTNrY and d a t e d OC,"POBER 7 , 19 96 . In consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is . hereby agreed that: THE BOND NUN43ER BE CHANGED FROI`R: 5094288 . T0: 341.266 T'he attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements., limitations and conditions except as herein expr2ssly moda,fied. This ri-der shall become effective as of the 7TH day of OC-"I'OBER 1996, 5igned, sealed and dated this 14TH day of OC'I'OBER 1996. THIS RIDER ACCEPTED ON , 19_ft SPOKANE COUNTY, WA DEpARZ'MENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING/ROADS DIVISION HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CONiE'ANY BY gy: . " Attorney"in-Fact oANNE TONANI . Bond No. 5094288 ROADwAY IlWPROVEi1CENT BOND KNOW AL.L BY 'IHESE PRESENTS, that K. C. OONSTRUCTION, INC. (developer), as "Principal," and HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE OOMPANY (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State oE ConnectYcut ~ and authorized to transact a surety business in the State of Washington, as "Surety," are heId and firmly bound unto Spokane Counry, a political subdivisioa of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of . FoRTt-Two TxousANn FoUt xuNIDRED srxrY-tvltvE AND 14/00-- DoUars 42,469.14 lawful money of the Uaited State of American, for the payment of which the Principal and Surery bind themselves, tbeir heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severallv, firmly by these presents. WBEREAS, said Principal is the developer of a tract of land in Spokane County known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS • an3 being located in Section 08 , Township 25 Nortb, Range 45 E.W.M., in Spokane Counry, Washington, and said County has required that a boad be furnished in an amount sufficient to pay the constructioa cost of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, drainage control and/or paving of roadways adjacent to said developwent, and such other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with Spokane County Road Department specifications, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer, such improvements to be completed two (2):years or less time unless said time period be extended at the option of the Spokane Counry Engineer. Upoa failure of Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surery, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the extent of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opin.ion of the Obligee, the requiremeats herein stated have beea satis6ed, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. Surety hereby waives all rights to release from the obligation except as herein stated. SIGNED A~W SEALED this 7th day oE October 19 96 K.C. Construction, Inc. ap a l B Y: Hartford Fire Insurance Company ' Sure ~ BY: Lois Stewart, Attorney-in-Fact ('Tide) ~1►~~~v C Y RTFORLI FIRE INSURA.NCE COM Harttord, Gonnecticut, - , - : ROWER OF ATTURNEY . . • , Krrow_ alt men by these Presents, That the WARTFORD FIRE-INSURANCE COMPANY, a oorporation duty organized under 1#ie+ laws of the'State of Connecticut, and having its principat office iri the City'afi_Hariford, Couniy of Hartford, State of Cannecticut, . - - daes hereby riiakew constitute andi appoint ' - W W. NU4K XI~'.C~4Rll W. MEIWLL, W 'M_ . D._INN1a CUM& S"1EIL.L"N, , . , . • , G',~CaR~E C. ,SCHROEL7ER, LOIS S7EWAR?; LI11VA TICf~.~il'; CARL4 HOLr . . ,74ANNE TON_ANI and RHONDA .r#.1YELSON of ~ SPO1X.41VE, WASH1117GT1?N ' its tnue, $nd lawful Attorney(s)•irrFad, wKh Fu11 power.and authoft to qa 6°of safd, Attorney(s)-in-Fact, in their separate capacity if more , ' - •fhan one; is narned, abbve, to sign, execute and acknowledga any and $Ill,~ands'arid und6r'takings an.d efher w~itings obligatory in the . ' n~tur+~ thereoF dn tiehalf of the Company in Its busihess ot ~gua"rant~eirig the fidelity ofi pe`rsons halding p'laces of public or private trust; guaranteeing the performance oi' contracts vlher than insurance poliaes; gU~.ranteeingl the performanoe of insurance coniracts where- 'surety Ibonds are acce,pted by states and municipaliGes, andl execuinq or guaraofe`eing bonds and undartakings req",uired or perrnitted in . a11 acfions orproceedings or by law allowed, and to binii the'LFIARTF9(?Q F,IRErIN$Uf2ANCE COMPANY inereby as fitily and to the same extent as iftucti bonds and undertakings and otheicwrit#ng"s obliptory_in tlie nature, thereaf wene signecl~ by an Executive pff`rcer af , . the HARTFORD FIFtE INSURANCe COMPANY, erd sealed,andl attested, by one"other of such, Officera, and hereby retifies and confirtns all ihat its said Attomey(s)-in-Fact may do in pursudnoe ihereof. . This power ot attomey is grented by and under authority af 1he fol{owiri j pfovisionsa (1i) By-Laws adopted by the Stodcholders of the HARTFORD; FIAL INSURANCE GOMPANY et a meeting duty call'ed and held on the 91h day of M'arch,1971. - , . . ARTIC _LtV - ' _ . - gCTION 8. The PreskWt or any Vioe-President, aciingl[ _with eny Sectetaryor Ass+stanl Secretary, shaN' have power and authority to eppoiM, tor purposes onty of executing and attesting, bonds and underlakings aM othei wr~ti~gs~,~ibligatory~ in the nature thereCf, one or more Resident Nic:e PresWents, ~iesident Assulant 5ecretarias and Attorne~s=in-Fact and;' af any,,tme to ~ remove. eny auch Residant vca-'Prasldent, Reaident Aasistanl Seuetary, of Attbrney-in-Fad, and Pevoke the power atid suthorfty.aiyen io him, SF,CTION 11. Attomeys-in=Fad shall have power end authoiity, subjecito ihe beffift andl Iimitatlons of the power oi attomey iaaued to them, to . • • execxite ai>d deliver qn behalt ot the Gompany and fo attach the a_e.al of the Compa,mi`~hare4o any,and all bonda and undertakings, a~nd other writinfls . - obligatory.fn the natureiheMof, and any such Instrument ozecuted by any,auch AI~o~Tney=in-Fad, shall be as bindinp upon the Company as iT319ned by an - - ' EXecutivv OfficeP an.d, aealed and atte.sted OY oneother of suchOfficets. This pQwer,oi-attomey is signed and sealed by facsiinile under and by,,tlie authority of the following Resolution adopted by the ' Directgre, ~of the HA'RT7 O~iO~~~'IRE INSURANCE COMPANY at,a,~m~ti~ig'cluly calledrand held on the '~2th day ot February, 1893. - Reaclvad; Mat t!a iipnol4na cf wah•Offioer6 and the seal ol the ComPan-Y ~?Y pe ~a!'~iec~ to, a~ny auch power d albomey cr to p-ny periflcme reWng teretfl by fpcabnile, w►d any such ppwer of aitorW aw cerlMcat$ beadno such,lscsimiie *naW7e3 or'faeslinile aeal ehal!_be valid arid Wndinp upon the Comparry and amy sud► pawer so - - 4zecuted and cxr~fl4d' ty fsca~mib ~1pnatwes and Iac~fmlb seal eheN be valid ar~ b~nd~y uPon~ ti,e car+aeny in4ne n,a,re whn, reaped so eny pom, a undenaft to wnkh n is - - ettacned, . ~ , , - ' In .Witnais, fteraof, the ,HARTOORD FIRE INSURANC~ COMPANY has'c~sec! these preseMs to be signed by its Yce- . ~ atte`_stgd '~jr its 5ecretO, this 1 st day of May,1995. - PresYdent, aridIts corpo~te seal io be hereto aff xed, duly ry ' . . ptiest H'ARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CAMRANY - - - - . , ` ~ tS//t - - '1~A~"~. ~ _ . • : R . _ . ` FtIchard~ 000 . . . , • ~ . - ~ r . - SfiATE,- 4F CONNECTiCUT = - ' Paul L. Marabetta - - - . _ . , # . , . , - , , - - COUNTY HIIEiTF4R0 _ Vke=,Preside,nt ° •.1;"Q11, this 1sf day.of May, A.D. 1995, befoie me personWly came Paui L_'Marabella, to me known, wha being by me duty swomt diii deposa , , . , - ' . ~nd sy fat~ !I~ fegid es in the ~ounty of Hartford, State o~ Gorit~eeticut;` tha- i~ is the Yce-Pres_'ident of the Hl4_RTFQRD' FIIkE, - ' . . INSURAN61! COMPANY, 1fie, corporation describedl in and.which ex0cutedihe abovd instniment; that he knows the saal of the said . - ' .6orpo(akion; that,the seal affixed to the said insaument i_s such coF,porafe seal; that it was so affixed by ~order of the Boend' ot Directars ofj • - .-Wd cvrpotation and that he signed his name thereto by like o,rder„ ' , - - - - . MQ'~'~!^- ~ ' _ - Y ~ ~ ' • . STA'~e ~O~' ~t~NNECTIGUT ..a ~ _ ' . " • aa. '4 ~'tisL~C ~ _ ' Jsan' . W4ozniek , - , • Ct7UNTY' OF HARTFQRD - Notdr PubHa ' - , - _ . MY Corhmission Expkee June 30. 1898 " cEimFIcaT,E = r . • _ • " I„ the undersigned, S#cmtary oithe HAR'TFORD_FIR9 INSlJRA1VC_ E COMPANY,, a Connecticut CorpareNon, 04 HEREBY CERTIFI'thatthe f9reg4ing,and ilttarhed P01NEFt OF A'TTORNEY rpmarris iriLVl1force and,has not heen revoked; and' furthertnore, that -the Resofutans,of the Board of Directors, set forth in thePower Qf Aaornay, ere rioinr in foroe. - " Signed •and sealed at-the Gity Qf Harttord. Deted ttie . 7th day of 4ctober 1996, . < r,,,; , , • , - 1•,,ti;n i ~ • . / ~ Robe+t L. Post ' . SeCmtilry , ` ~ . FornS-35Q7-9 (flf) Prinud in U.S.A. ` - _ . ~ , , , _ . . ' . . • . . . .s ~ - , i S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director r- ~ J L VPa~ ~ F. Ba~ T ,r ~ ~ 105011 N. E. i iQhrYi =t~' 400 s~U.l v~ . 98004 . At tri: D ouql~s ? = ~ ----rT _ - r= ;1- ~~:r I - i ~ ' ~ ...i ..i. aJ... LL l ♦ ~.~`u~ i ~ P~~t r~ - w~v ~►-:Pl . ~ ~ ~•~11~•:Jii f.~ L. . .:J?' r: C i t' i ; " ~7 "'t r r' ! _ e CIc ~ ,_1 ` ! I~l ~J . ? d q 7 i~ t s s tl l~ t` i'~'~ D r- r r ~ t T Y` ;~'r'~_, r~ r .1 ~ cs_ I~ j~ i~ J' ~i.l~ r ~ rv~ ~ r ~ v+~ d i i y~ l~u i- ~r ? i } a ~ ~ ~ ~ , (D y~ iII F I: ` i ~.rtr~~ LiL ~ ~ ~ -~Ji L ~ ~t'-1~ir~~a ~ 1o~t jr?i~t~t a~i ~ ~ i a a~.. - = ~ j r , ~ ~ rS a:++-t ~ ~ 1 • ~ ~ . t S f . ~ } 1 Ln ~ e 1 1 r~ ~47 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ L L i - • 7 F f+ G T' SD U } } 1 z~ Q r'~T , L _",J `I '~u r u , L° LJ ~c- ~r. r=.._ ~ r~ _ . . ~ i • :i _ • L r+: ,i+r• Y4Q f- 1n r~T aa..t .rA .1. t _ ~ ~ ~l '1 ~.1.t ~ ~ • ,.J'~ ~ _ ~ ~ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 -OEFICP. aF `?'I3E COIIBrTY ENGINamR i sFon= co---t, W&sHINGToN ~ . , . ~ To : snK RAnER t"ROM: DaVE ElEltTO DATE : inne 21 , 1996 9UBUECT: BO1VD ITZM.S P14143 RIVEP.WP.LK ?DJU ALD The bond for the above mantivned projec;t i~ for the rullowing . ~ . P1tl~ . 1) Al1 the items an the approvea Load and drainage plans. ~;~~~n ~ ~ c~L~1 rr? \ IQa1I1{".: ~ 1, fi P:tl~ ~ ~ ~ - - ,1, SEAF/RST Douglas B. Sollitt Vice President Builder Banking June 7, 1996 Mr. Bill Johns Spokane Counry Engineer 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane. WA 99260 Ref: Developer/Borrower: Stanton-Spokane, L.P. Our Loan No.: 8467777703-26 Funds in the amount of $39,726.14 are being set-aside in a construction loan in the name of Stanton-Spokane, L.P. (developer/borrower), et ux, in lieu of a bond, for the purpose of assuring completion and installation of roadway surfacing, including clearing and gravel, storm drainage and monuments in Riverwalk 2nd Addition (development) in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's Office on October 31, 1995. No funds will be disbursed from this set-aside without the prior written authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of funds will not be revoked without the consent of the County Engineer. In the event that the completion and acceptance of the above-named improvements for maintenance by the County of Spokane are not acoomplished within a period of one year from the date of this agreement. All funds remaining in the set-aside will be forfeited to the County of Spokane upon written request by the Spokane County Engineer's Office to BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, sucoessor by name change to SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association. It is understood and agreed that upon the forfeiture of the funds to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will then undertake completion of the subdivision to be accomplished within twelve (12) months from the date of the forfeiture of funds. It is further understood and agreed that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete improvements, the County of Spokane may have recourse against Stanton-Spokane, L.P. (developer/borrower) named above. Seafirst Bank shall be under no liability for non- completion of the work, its obligations being expressly limited to holding and disbursing the set-aside funds as agreed in the agreement. It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development BANK OF AMERICA NW, N.A., doing business as SEAFIRST BANK, successor by name change to SEATTLE-FIRST NATIONAL BANK, a national banking association is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance of the above-named improvements. Seafirst Bank Builder Banking/Real Estate Center/10500 N.E. Eighth Street, Suite 400/Bellevue, Washington 98004 Telephone (206) 585-6462 FAX (206) 585-6475 5E4FJRST ; - _ . ' - • . ACCEPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of June,1996. STANTON-SPOKANE L P., a Washington limited partnership By: DEAN-HOUSLEY, L.L.C. a Washington limited liability company General Partner By: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION a Washington corporation Member B . v~ Y: P. Edward Dean, President Brian Housley Member ':~p I SEAFIRST BANK ~ ~ ~ . . By: Douglas EK Sollitt Vice President OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER By: . its: . . 1 ST BOND REQUCTION PROJECT P1414A RIVERWAL144R8 ADD NAME DAVE BERTa DATE 05-Jun-06 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) prywal _ Type q ~ 26q6 EA 025 1250.00 312.50 2) pfyweq _Type g~25% EA 0.75 1650.00 1237_50 3) Grata -'i'yae 1Q 2596 EA 1 315.00 315.00 4) Otate Type 20 25% EA 0,5 340.00 170.00 5) Qrate - Type 4 EA 300.00 0.00 6) Beckf'~I For DW 0 2596 CY 35 16.00 560.00 7) Cartude trdd C 25% EA 1.5 750.00 1125.00 8) C.M. Pte 1(r Dia. LF 27.00 0.00 9) C_M_ Rlpe 12" Dia. Q 2596 LF 40 27.00 1 b80.00 10) C.M_ PIpe 15' Dta. LF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. P4pe 18" Dla_ LF 31.50 0.00 12) Ptecast Mantwle EA 1500.00 0.00 13) sola r~a Q 25% EA 310.00 0.00 14) DktV2Q8 Excevetian C 10096 CY 560 10.00 5500.00 15) Sod 0 100% SF 6254 0.70 4375.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE iTEttitS 1}SkiwalC lnlei ~ Vauft) ~ 25% EA 0.75 700.00 525.00 2) Curb inid & Apron C 259b EA 0.25 200.00 50.00 3) CPE Pipe 12" C 2596 SF 15 15.00 225.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 g) 0.00 ORAINAGE SUBTOTAL 15475.00 16) N4onuments @ 100% EA 5 185.00 5Z.00 17) Bwrimde LF 33.00 0.00 18} Street Sigm Q 100% EA 2 85,00 170.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 1095.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEVIlALK 18) Rough Orsde C 2596 CY 307.66 10.00 3076.50 ZOy Top Course CY 16.00 0.00 21) One Gourse C 2596 CY 205.1 16.00 3281.60 22) Asphak Cortcrete 0 2596 Tons 210.225 44.40 9M.99 23} Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Gurb Type BQ 2596 LF 390.1 8.00 3120.80 25) Gurb 'Type R LF 8.00 0.00 26) Sidem* C 2596 , SQ YD 260.075 16.70 4343.25 NQN-STANQARD RQAD ITENlS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 oRA[?iNQ AtVD SURFAClNQ 23155.14 ~ USE $39,80Q,00 r3i,726.14 ~ GRAND TOTAL ' . . y - BOND EST[MATE PROJECT P1414A R1VERINALK 2ND ADD NAME DAVE BERTa QATE 06-Jun-86 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1}Dtyw~! - Type A EA 1 1~0.00 1250.00 2) pryway _ Type g EA 3 1660.00 4960.00 Z~ 3) Grate _ Zype 1 EA 4 315.00 1260.00 Z~ 4) Grete Type 2 EA 2 340.00 680.00 z> 5) Grate - Type 3 EA 300.00 0.00 6) BadMA For OW CY 16.00 0.00 _ 7) Cancrde Inld EA 6 750.00 4500.00 Z~ $j C.M_ Pips 1(r DkL LF 23.00 0.00 ~ 9) C.M. P" 12" D#a. LF 160 27.00 4320.00 z~ 10} C.M. P" 15' Dia. lF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. Plpe 1ir Qia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Pmcasi Manhde EA 1500.00 0.00 13) SoW fid EA 4 310.00 1240.00 2>~ 14) DbhV208 E=svabon CY 560 10.00 5500.00 /DO 15} Sod SF a250 0.70 4375.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE lTEMS 1)SWewatic lMel (W&M Vauk) EA 3 700.00 2100.00 Z~ 2) Curb IMet & Apron EA i 200.00 200.00 Z~ 3) CPE Pipe 17 SF $0 15.00 900.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 g) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 31275.00 16} Monmne.rft EA 5 185.00 925.00 /o 0 17} Beriicade LF 33.00 0.00 18) StrEet Sigm EA 2 85.00 170.00 /aG OTHER SU6TOTAL 1095.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK ~ 19) Rouo Gracie CY 1230.8 10.00 1zjQ6,00 2.6- 20) Top Cou9e CY 16.00 0.00 ~ 2116we Cowse CY 820.4 16.00 1312&40 Z a 22) Asphalt Cancrds ToM 840.9 "40 37335.96 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) curb T~" g LF 15so.4 8.00 124as.2o za'25) Cutb Typs R LF 8.00 0.00 r~ 26) Sidewelk SQ YD 1040.3 16.70 17373.01 2a IYON-STANDARD RQAD iTEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 C3RADINt3 AND SURFACINt3 8252457 USE $t Z5,000,00 . • ~ I-~ BONQ ESTtMATE PRQJEC7 P1414A RIVERyVALl4 2ND ADD NAME DAVE BERTQ DATE 05-Jun-06 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE GOST 1}DrywM -'type A EA 1 1250.00 1250.00 2} DrywaN - Type B EA 3 1650.00 4950.00 3) Gtate - Type 1 EA 4 315.00 1260.00 4} Grafi.e Type 2 EA 2 340.00 680.00 5} 4We - Type 3 EA 300.00 0.00 . 6} BaclcfiN Foc DW CY 16.00 0.00 7) Goncrete IrM EA 6 750.00 4500.00 8) C.M. Pipe 1(r Dia_ LF 23.00 0.00 9) C.M. Ripe 17 D#a. LF 160 27.00 4320.00 10} C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. P" ii" Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 12) PrecM tVtarrhoie EA 1500.00 0.00 13) SoM fid EA 4 310.00 1240,00 14) ~kctLF" E=avation cv 550 10.00 55oo.00 15) sw sF 6= 0.70 4375.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE IfiEtVlS 1 ySdeMratk lrtW (VNftat Vauky EA 3 700.00 2100.00 2) Curb IrM & Apron EA 1 200.00 200.00 3) CPE Pipe 1 Z" SF 60 15.00 800.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 31275.00 16) Nbrmnerds EA 5 185.00 925.00 17) Befficede LF 33,00 0100 18) Stted Siyns EA 2 85.00 170.00 OTHF-R SUBTOTAL 1096.00 GRADING, SURFACtNG, CURB, AND SIDEINALK 19) Rotgh Qtade CY 1230.6 10.00 12306.00 zo} Top coume cv 16.00 0.00 21) Bm Cottrse CY 820.4 16.00 13126.40 22} Asphak Concrote Tons 840.9 44.40 37335.96 23) Cum6 Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 15W.4 8.00 12483.20 25) Gufb lype R LF 8.00 0.00 26} SideweNc SQ YD 1040.3 16.70 17373.01 NQN-STANQARD RQAQ iTEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 C3RADINC3 AND SURFACINC3 82fi24.57 U5E $125,000.00 GRAND TOTAL 124,994.57 . BONO ESTtNlATE PROJECT P1414A RNEfiWALK 2ND ADD NAME DAVE BERTa DATE 314fty-N DRAINAGE ITEMS UNtTS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) prywoR _ lype A ! EA 1250.00 0.00 t 25a vv 2) prymy -Type g 3 EA 1690.00 0.00 4''ty-> 3) C-xge _7~" 1 4 E4 315.00 0.00 lZ(a° 4) C3rde Type 2 Z EA 340.00 0.00 Ggo 5) C3rate - Type 3 EA 300.00 0.00 6) 68dO Fvr OVN CY 16.00 0.00 7) Conade fniet ,--'i~pc t (oEA 750.00 0.00 Oan 8) C.M_ Pipe 1 DIa. LF 23.00 0.00 - 9) C.M. P4pe 12" D#a. lLF 27.00 0.00 q-3zo 1 %-6:M_ Pipe 15" Dia. LF • 27.80- 0.00 - 11) C.M. P4pe 1 g' Dia. LF 31.50 0.00 - t 2} Precast Merthole - EA 1500.00 0.00 - 13) Sohd t'id 4- EA 310.00 0.00 124 14) Qitc.tV108 Excavation 159° CY 10.00 0.00 Ss~ IS) Sod &y5v SF 0,70 0.00 a-37s NON STANDARD DRAINAGE 1TEMS 1} 5 (&VAzc[ inxT (+mt-B ,r !/rtg,~?) 3EA 0•00 , 0.00 2) cu*-8 trxU ~ 3) QE PioE (qgs h- t2 ) - IZ`` 4 co t;~ 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 g) 0.00 DRAtNAGE SUBTOTAL 0.00 16) Monimrenb EA 5 185.00 92'S.00 - 17} BBnicede LF 33.00 0.00 16) Shec# Siyns EA 2 85.00 170.00 OTHER SUBTdTAL 1095.00 GRADiNG, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) RouQh t3rade CV 1230.6 10.00 12306.00 20) Top Coucse CY 16.00 0.00 21) 6ase Cowse CY 820.4 16.00 13126.40 22) Asphait Conffe% Tons 840.9 44.40 37335.96 23) Curb ?yps A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Gurb Typs B LF 1560.4 8.00 12483.20 25) Curb Typa R LF 8.00 0.00 26? Sidcmaik SQ YD 1040.3 16.70 17373.01 NON-STANDARD RDAD ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 ORADINO AND SURFACENC3 92624.57 GRAND TOTAL 4719.57 STREET BUANTITIES , PROJECT IdO.- P1414A DESIGNER- DAVE BERTO DATE- 5/31/96 PROJECT DESCRIPTION- RIVERWALK 2ND ADD STREET # 1 NAME- INDIANA AVE LENGTH- 810.19 FT. WIDTH- 37.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 1157.02 ENDING STATION = 1967.21 INTER 1 FULL INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 42.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 IHTER 2 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 50.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 TERM * 1 : CNOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM MEASUREMENT QUANTITY SURFACE AREA- 33226. 76 S. F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 1.00 FT. 1230.6 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.00 FT. 0.0 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACING HASE COURSE 0.67 FT. 820.4 C. Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.33 FT. 840.9 TONS CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0.00 FT. PROPOSED 1560.4 FT. SIDEWALK ExISTING 0.00 S. Y. PROPOSED 1040.3 S. Y. TOTALS ROADWAY EXCAVATION 1230.6 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.0 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 820.4 C. Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE 840.9 TOHS CURB TYPE B 1560.4 FT. SIDEWALK 1040.3 S. Y. Of ON SHEET OKANE , o~ ~P Sheet ~ pate ~ - ~ ~ . . ~ , : k~~ • _ ~ , ~ - ~ _ corc. by . - Gher I4oig ~ D j'_~'-~-!' . ~ ~3 ti°• ~ ~ ~ a ~ t 1 , ~ ~ - ~ .~^"T 4 • I , ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ' 1~"'"'r---- 4 fIV ~ v. ' 1 \ ! y ~ 1 ^ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , ~ • ~ ! ~ : _h~-.-- q •i M t ' ,k { 4 T ~ - M 1 a ~ ~ - ~ , ~ ~ r.` Ya ~~ICE oF ` ~ TIQN SNEET ~ ~ . NT~ CAL~uLA Prolect~ o~ _ , GpV ,poKANE , - _ sheet . - ~ w ~ by k~~ Col~, ' ~ Che ck b~- Not65 , Q <<~.~ ~ ; ~ , j~►'~ t , ~ ~ ~ lJ~`~ 4---- ~ ~~3• ~ ° ~ 1°` ~ _ °V r + ~ ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ ...s----~ _.---'t- ~ , • ~ k S ,r,,. ~ ~k t ~ w ~ 1. q ~'~i..t~ ° 1 i~_1r}~Y . . ~ 1 . ~...At•°y' ' i / t N 3 ~ ~ , ~ n ` t t ~ 1T b ~ ~ ~ t i c• rI ~ , ~ TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSI:TRANCE COMPANY NoRTx 72 0 ARCOrrrrE S POKANE , WASHINGTON 99212 Prepared f or : Order No.: CD-196132M DEAN BUILDING CORP. Charge: $125.00 16720 N.E. 116TH ST. Tax: 10.00 REDMOND, WA 98052 Total: $135.00 cc: Inland Pacific Engineering SEVENTH REPORT P L A T C E R T I F I C-A T E Effective Date: May 31, 1996, at 8:00 a.m. Certificate for fil'ing Plat of : RIVERWALK SECOND A.DDITION In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the_records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amaunt, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit: That portion of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter and Government Lots 5 and 6 of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45 E.W.M., more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the most Northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 23 of Plats, Pages 37 through 40; thence South 29059158" East along the Easterly boundary of said RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION, a distance of 159.08 feet; thence North 6000010211 East, a distance of 269.96 feet; thence South 290591581, East, a distance of 27.01 feet (Rec. 27.00 feet) ; thence North 68000158" East, a distance of 61.93 feet; thence North 7504015811 East, a distance of 63.00 feet (Rec. 63.30 feet) ; thence North 89048100" East, a distance of 331.53 feet; thence North 00012' 00" West, a distance of 119.41 feet lRec. 119.34 feetl ; thence North 0204110311 East, a distance of 60.08 feet; thence North 00012100" West, a distance of 119.94 feet (Rec. 120.00 feet) ; thence South 89050154" West; a distance of 76.76 feet; thence South 89048104" West, a distance of 160.00 feet; thence South 81 ° 17' S2 " West, a distance of 141.92 f eet ; thence North 710511581, West, a distance of 75.52 feet; thence South 180081021' West, a distance of 95.67 feet; thence South 40030' 15" West, a distance of 130.05 feet; thence South 60000102" West, a distance of 249.12 feet to the Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington Page 1 of 4 . / ! I ~Order No. CD-196132M VESTED IN: ' ANTON-S~ POKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership. : . . E PTIONS: 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel 1Vo. 55083.9010 AND 55083.9052. Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. 21. Liability to future charges by Spokane County for Storm Water service. 3. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19. 4. Covenant imposed by instrument recorded on May 20, 1994, under Recording No. 9405200420. 5. DECLARATION OF COVENANT.AND EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BETWEEN: Stanton Development Company, a Washington General Partnership, on its own behalf and as nominee for Stanton-Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership AND: Wel Co Group, Inc., a Washington Corporation, their heirs, successors and assigns PURPOSE: Ingress.and egress and utilities AREA AFFECTED: Portion of Govt. Lots 5 and 6 in Sec. 8, Twn. 25 N., R. 45 EWM RECORDED: May 15, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9505150112 This Declaration of Covenant & Easement ("Easement") shall terminate automatically; with respect to any portion of the easement area dedicated to-the public, at the time of such dedication. 6. VOLUNTARY MITIGATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: July 24, 1995 . RECORDING NO.: 9507240089 FOR MITIGATING SCHOOL IMPACT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO LIABILITY FOR SAID MITIGATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $750.00 FOR EACH NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT. Page 2 of 4 Page 3 of 4 • • Order No. CD-196132M 7. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for River Walk imposed by instrument recorded on July 25, 1995, under Recording No. 9507250312, including, but not limited to, liability for assessments levied by the community association, and rights or benefits which maybe disclosed affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 8. TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: PURPOSE: AREA AFFECTED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: Spokane County Allowing natural drainage and/or runoff Portion of SW1/4 of Sec. 8, Twn. 25 N., R. 45 EWM July 28, 1995 9507280291 This Easement will terminate at such time the described areas are platted. 9. Covenants, conditions and restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on January 3, 1996, under Recording No. 9601030054, including but not limited to rights or benefits which may be disclosed affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 10. Covenants, conditions and restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on April 2, 1996, under Recording No. 9604020267, including but not limited to rights or benefits which may be disclosed affecting land outside the boundary described in Schedule A. 11. DEED OF TRUST, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING WITH ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: TRUSTEE: BENEFICIARY: ORIGINAL AMOUNT: DATED: RECORDED: RECORDING NO.: AREA AFFECTS: Stanton -Spokane L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership $ainier-CLedit-Company Seattle -First National Bank, Banking Association $ 2 , O 4 /TOTTr:t-0--,_- .-- September 29, 1995 October 10, 1995 9510100081 Affects this and other property Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. SAID DEED OF TRUST IS A RE-RECORD OF THE DEED OF TRUST RECORDED ON March 29, 1996, UNDER RECORDING NO. 9603290131. Page 3 of 4 ;.., . i i Order No. CD-196132M 13. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458-2538. In order to make payment, account number is necessary. ENCLOSURE(S): Sketch sac END OF EXCEPTIONS TR.ANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY BY For s- ice on this order (509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1 9 Connie Dodge, Title Officer Page 4 of 4 i_ BOND ESTIMATE PROJECT P1414A RNERWALK 2HD ADD NAME DAVE BERTD DATE 314ft-66 DRAINAGE ITEMS UN1TS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) prpWi _Type q EA 1250.00 0.00 2) prywg _Type g EA 16W.00 0.00 3) Grate -'Type i EA 315.00 0.00 4} C3rate Type 2 EA 340.00 0.00 5) Gtate - Type 3 EA 300.00 0.00 6) 6odO For OW CY 16.00 O.OD 7) Concrete Inlet EA 750.00 0.00 8) C.M. Po 1(r Dla_ LF 23.00 0.00 9) C.M. RlIe 12` Dia. LF 27.00 0.00 10) C.M_ Pipa 15" Dia. LF 27.80 0.00 11) C.M. Ptpe 1 g' Dla. LF 31.50 0.00 12) Precest Menhole F.A 1500.00 0.00 13) SoN f~d EA 310.00 0,00 14) pkh= E=vation CY 10.00 0.00 15) sw SF 0.70 0.00 NON STANDARQ DRAINAGE lTEMS 0.00 Z) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 g) 0.00 ORAtNAGE SUBTOTAL 0.00 16) Monuments EA 5 185.00 925.00 17} 138ft4ide LF 33.00 0.00 18) Stret SOs EA 2 85.00 170.00 OTHER SUBTdTAL 100.00 GRADlNG, SURFACiNG, CURB, AND SIDEWALiC 19) Rough C3tade CY 1230.6 10.00 12306.00 20j Top Coutse CY 16.00 0.00 21) gm Cww CY 820.4 16.00 13126.40 22) Asphak Concrete ToM 8d0.9 44.40 37335.96 23) Ctxb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24j curb Type B LF I5so.4 8.00 12483.20 25) Curb lypa R LF 8.00 0.00 26} Sidewolt SQ YD 1440.3 16.70 17373.01 NaN-STANDARD ROAQ ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 d) 0.00 QRJo1D11dC3 AND SURFACItdC3 9M4.57 GRAND TOTAL 931719.57 STREET QUANTITIES PROJECT NO.- P1414A DESIGNER- DAVE BERTO PROJECT DESCRIPTION- RIVERWALK 2ND ADD DATE- 5/31/96 STREET # 1 NAME- INDIANA AVE LENGTH- 810.19 FT. WIDTH- 37.00 FT. BEGINNING STATION = 1157.02 ENDING STATION = 1967.21 INTER # 1 FULL INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 42.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 INTER # 2 T INCLUDED ISWIDTH = 50.00 SK = 0.00 RAD = 20.00 TERM # 1 : CHOPPED TERM # 2 : CHOPPED ITEM MEASUREMENT QUANTITY SURFACE AREA- 33226. 76 S.F. ROADWAY EXCAVATION 1.00 FT. 1230.6 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0.00 FT. 0.0 C.Y. CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0. 67 FT. 820. 4 C. Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.33 FT. 840.9 TONS CURB TYPE B EXISTING 0.00 FT. PROPOSED 1560.4 FT. SIDEWALK EXISTING 0.00 S.Y. PROPOSED 1040.3 S.Y. TOTALS ROADWAY EXCAVATION CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE ASPHALT CONCRETE CURB TYPE B SIDEWALK 1230.6 C.Y. 0.0 C.Y. 820.4 C.Y. 840.9 TONS 1560.4 FT. 1040.3 S.Y. I n INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. May 16, 1996 I.P.E. W.O. #95617 Dean-Housley Building Corporation 16720 N.E. 116th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: SUBJECT: Dear Verne: Mr. Verne Jacobsen, Superintendent Construction Deficiency List Riverwalk 2nd Addition ? (4- Spokane County, Washington This letter transmits a list of constructed items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non-conformance with approved project plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to preparation of project record drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and approval of the construction by the County Engineer's office. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on 10 May 1996, and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This letter is an addendum to our April 12 and May 7, 1996 letters regarding deficiencies in Riverwalk 2nd Addition construction. DRAINAGE PONDS The five stormwater retention/disposal ponds (A,B,C,E,F3) have three non -conforming items in common: Pond bottoms not flat. /64 cwvier Latiegp4,7 Some topsoil, no landscaping (sod or hydroseed) or irrigation installed. Irregular pond bottoms and 3:1 sideslopes not met. POND A * Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk must be completed. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 ,CF WED MAY 1 7 1996 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER POND E 07 /0- (11444,iv ipoto 41,4,e POND F3 Riverwalk 2nd Addition Deficiency List #3 Page 2 of 3 POND B Pipe from inlet structure in pond to drywell under sidewalk is not at design grade. This pipe as installed is flat. Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk must be completed. POND C Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk must be completed. ,{M-,t-1 —cw cSa ptat sfw Pond not to plan dimensions (65ft x 11ft, no 10ft radius corner in south end, Tess than 5ft horizontal sideslope distance). Inadequate elevation difference between gutter line at inlet and drywell grate (0.18 vs. 0.50 ft). tx..2, 41,1 AWid i4eAy.. --0,64 �-z� �� (Lw� ?- ADDITIONAL ITEMS V �"� Temporary cutoff swales should be constructed as shown in the plans to keep sediment laden stormwater from running into the street. Areas along indiana Avenue where curb drops were constructed subsequent to AC paving support smears of gutter concrete on the asphalt pavement, resulting in a non -conforming finish. All roadway sections on the plans indicate a 5' flat area directly adjacent to and behind the curb or sidewalk. Additionally, this area should be vibratory compacted to insure adequate compaction for these same soils and to minimize any voids created during the utility installation process. Riverwalk 2nd Addition Deficiency List #3 Page 3 of 3 This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved/are approvable under current County Standards. Our preparation of this letter in no way releases the contractor from his responsibility for constructing the improvements per approved project plans and specifications, and applicable sections of the current Spokane County Standards. By a copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the above issues. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. Respectfully Submitted, INLAND PACIF C ENGINEERING 1 Jert)i E. P'eterson, P.E. Project Engineer 49 cc: Bill Johns,,Czour1 y Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Ed Par , Plan Review Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Jim R6dke, Construction Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Terry Lightfoot, Chief Inspector, Spokane County Public Works Ed Dean, Dean Housley Company xcirtffr a:\95617\defclst3. wpf ire INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: KA e C.sa 10J axS ATTENTION: et ': RKLAE Description DATE. (0-240-'is I.P.E. PROJECT #: 5-Cl/Mt,a PROJECT NAME: Q'L-V--' 2."°.+Zr tc5 El Xerox Prints El Copy of Letter 0 EJ Original Drawing 0 Contract Documents 0 0 Work Authorization 0 Report No. Copies 5 ) 5\ Description /) 6 oU 1701STtC-r 4 C LA't F'(CATte1J 'R su.i...75 TAM trKA Purpose EJ Information EJ Review & Comments ©Per Your Request EJ Written Approval 0 Signature & Return Remarks RECEIVED tr."' 26 1995 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER • Signed: ih.dthis k OPAP-5 1?) kikadO Itte- V44502. Fw•ag- 4 Pru= derYW x . JCS RAS 144041- �Z Is i2C�G�G W � �� ice- Va� F�I� ��� � �� GaM,p- tArf (Sc tiq n ha-1S skiojiA, ~ ~ • ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ . . i ' . • • . •i'.y:.t: ~ . 3512140151 , . r r., . . ~~Q 44 Parcel No's. 55083.9010 & 55083.9052 ~AE, li;~~A~11)E Indiana Avenue No. 1689 "D" r11fURP 1414 5r,~~'4`~~i~p,~p~TYY WA5N. ~ SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERINf3 DEPARTMENT ' Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT YO~. 18 O 5 POGE V V The Grantor(e) STANTON-SPOKANE LP, a Washington Limited Partnership of tha County of King State of Waehington, for and in coneideration of Mutual . Benefite, the receipt of which ie hereby acknowledged, grante to Riverwalk Owners Association of the County of Spokane, State of Washincrton and to the County of Spokane, 3tate of Waehington „ an Laeement over, under, and acrose ' the following deecribed real property eituated in the County of Spokane, State of Waehington: . That portioii of the South Half of the Souttiwest Quarter and . Government Lot 51 of section 8, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington, more particularly described as f ol lows : Beginrifng at tlie most northerly corner of Tract "H" of RIVERWALK FIRST ADDITION according to the plat recorded in • - Book 23 of Plats, Paqes 37 though 40; thence N.60000102"E. 'along the easterly prolongatfon of the north line of safd Tract "H" a distance of 7.65 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing N.60000102"E. a distance of 82.50 feet; thence N.29058'58"W. a distance of 6.50 feet; thence S.6000010211W. a distance of 82.50 feet; thence S.29059'58"E. a distance of 6.50 feet 'to the True Point of Beginning. The Grantor•* . will conetruct the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plane on file in the County Engineere office. Thie EASEMENT grante to Riverwalk Owners Association the right of ingreee and egrese to, over, and from eaid EASEMENT for the purpose of ' conetructing, inepecting, and maintainir~ the drainage ways and facilitiee in conformance with the approved plan. ~ The Riverwalk Owners Association • , or their eucceseore in interest ehall maintain the drainage facilitiee in conformance with the approved plane on file in the Engirieere office. Maintenance financinq of the drainage facilities ehall be in a manner determined bY Riverwalk Owners Association , or their eucceeaore in intereet. Should Riverwalk Owners Association , . be terminated for any reaeon, the eucceeeore in interest ehall be the individual lot ownere, or their eucceseore in interest, who are membere of .t},A Riverwalk Owners Association at the time of eaid termination. In -the -event euch private drainage facilitiee are improved to Spokane County etandarde, and the County ie willing to accept the dedication of euch drainage facilitiee, each lot owner ehall execute any documente neceseary to accomplieh such dedication. 3gokane County ie'hereby granted the right of ingrees and egreee to, over, and from the above deecribed property. J`" - ' Fi.E. Ex~ise 7 Lt Spo ne 45y; - ~ 0 y Voi.1805P4GE 91 Whenever The Riverwalk Owners Association or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved Drainage Plan, a notice will be give to _ The Riverwalk Owners Association or their successors in interest by the County. If not corrected after ten (10) days, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense of The Riverwalk Owners Association or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage whatsoever, including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this 9 "' day of D E c eM s F 19 STANTON-SPOKANE L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership BY: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A Washington General Partnership ITS General Partner. BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation, Partner BY: 'IbJ/•\/ ITS Pr-f S e.1— BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation Partner BY: RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR OBLI ATION MAINTAIN BY c► ITS rP%Z i .f• • • • fr~ , . , ~ ✓Val.1S05P~GF 92 CKND'~'EDGME~S A . ~T~N ~8S me► the ~TE OF 'WASxIN ~ 9 9 S , bef °re ~ 1 t~ o f W ashin~n o~ to be . 'untY of '~l~ ~nd f r th'~ Sta t°~ ~ ash inqt°n ton Ttt daY o f Pp~ T 101 ► a W a s h i n 9 a t h N otarY I N G GaR C O M~''~Y r E L• i r,e d , e~ ~ ~ g U I L E~ppM E N` r STp,N T p N~- S F O~ goi n 9 n d e r 8 g a p p e a~ o of S'rOT ON D EVon~lly ~ al partne r e W ith in a ri d f~,~e an d er8 , futrier ~e~ner tYi the es ;he on ~ and p~`r Who is the that eXecu ~~ent to ~ses and purp° ~u ,orporati tnershig tnership said ins for the iyed to exe tion °~r th~ c°rpora . ~en'~r~`1 t°ri Li~'~'t~ ~kno ledqed a p~►rtnersh at` he Is au nh , i$ Waghing ent t and a deed of g~~~ $tated aff iXed a Y $~al ioiuntarY ac io ~d, and °th~t the ast v ereir ~o'ent ~ent and nd Year 1 wy p"''••.. ~e said i ia carporation • seal the d~`Y a ~ • ~r i sa ~.w ti'' a r $eal of and of f icu ial ~ ~ - nder my hand S Giwen ~ r t wr it,~en pUBLIC ln an at 1♦~~+: : NoTp~gY residing .,sr-9 ~ M~~ Wa$hing isn i re S ~ . ~ ~ s 3.ori eXp . j s►. MY c ~ . ` , 3►_ J ; 'r. ~ WASKINGTO ss be f e . me ~ , gTp,TE ~'F ) 19 w~shinqt to~ a f k/~ 4 f~ r the State ~'f to me k~ Wn.on CountY ~i~c in and to . daY of ub ~C I~1T CpgpO R~ T 014 ' Wash~n~ L° p~ a On tri8 g a N°tar~ p~~^' ~~KsEY D~E~pMNiENT CO~~TON'SpOK"EO3.nq g3.gtZed r ed HoUSL EL4P STAN ore9 under ear of f ST~+~ON D~ partner 0f and f~ee and • p,~r8ona11£s 1 a~ app~✓ ~ tner a Gener~` ted the W lt ~en the ur ose~ the ~ion. and par who ig the that ~XeCUtr~erit to uses and P p ~ute Co~°ra p~rtner$h~'ppaYtnergr`~'the $~`id lni , for t~`ethar1Zed toc rP°ration General Li~it ed edged tnersh P is au , the wash~,rqto ~ and ackn of said s~~,~ed that Xea t i f anY) lg inst~ sar act and d and on °atthe seal ~`f t i ve v~lun in ~enti°ne et an~ that d Year last ab~ , there ~nst~ orPoratior► • the daY an id } • . °g said c the and off iclal se a seal mY hand . under Yie S Given In and ° ' itten. pu$~,Ic , ding ~t wr N~Tplg,y res~ ~v!►~~~~:~: washinqt°n , eXp lres ~ ~ N iSgiOn f. '~~r MY co~ • ~i 4) ~ .r ~7 ~ i' t~t~• ' ~ , ' STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of X/4v4j vat. 1805Pw 93 .( • On this $r7,'" day of .be cer, .re,c , 19 S(-, before 'me";.:the'.,;' undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington personally appeared /i i e.0 45. "M.- / Oct , to me known to be the Authorized Agent of RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said Association, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC n and or t e Sta 4 ' p : ••.'ram_ Washir ;ton, residing at S�aa�i�• ' My commission expires G _, S E o ' 0) 1��:� M C.. ;t -, ,.s '. • • _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ - . J ~ ~ {°1•,~ ~ 1 l ~-~y~ 8 . , _ • - ' ' wr~----- =T--~"""t--- % 2 • 3 ~ ~ 5 1'r-'~%," ~ t5'. ~o~.J., , _ _ .r-- ~ Q ~ ~ 1 ~ . 3' . : r,~ ~ 2 .3 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ r3 12~ l 4 . , ~ ~ . . 6 a " ~ ~ ~ 9 Q~ " j~jp 'iE. r Av ~ ~C ~ ~ ' ~ 13 12 1~~ i .~t . ~J C~ ' 2 13 T'z_ ~ . N'~.t- ~ T . O , ,~J M - 3' ~ 11 A _ ~~A ~E 5 ~ 2 ~ . ra 6 ~ s ' ' • ` • ~ s . . q ~q g ~ 2 3 ~ , 9 . ~ I 1 ~N , , ~ o- r---,-~^ Z~o ►Z ~o ~ ~~i 3~ ~ t ~ 10 g 9 7~g g 9 _`3 ir ~ ~ ~ ` - 2 5 -6 0 0 ~,a " ZA g 4 ,s g ~ ~ ~ 4~n . 3 c~. F 4 9 1 1 1?~ 3~~~ 5 ` `6 ` 1°r ~ ~j¢ G~ ~ 7 v `O j~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~O V`~ U - 1 .r-$ ~ ! a „ ~ z b ot~ 4 ~bq p1 r ~t , . ~ c? , i ~ ? ►9 3 t1 . ~ ~ ~ ~ i~1 ~S i9 Z oo . Z Z - j4 ~ . l a',~~~ ~ , _ 0 ~ ♦ ih ~ ~ - 3q'~~"' rI t4 ` ~ ~J Q-~~ ~ ' ~ ~ 4 j K~^f ~ /5 't2 ~ ~3 ~ z2 ~<Pg~ ~ ~2 . 8 ~ a~ " zazi ~ ~ tG ~ S C n ~ 9~~ rf ~ ~ y ~ , ~ b ~ i ~ J7 tR ~ ~A• 16 ~ - ~ ~ t~ ,S . t ,3 ~ ~vo~ rZ ~ ~ ~ 4 `O , ~ - ~ . . ' ~ ~A' ~ ~ y 6 ~rw. qc6- ~ ww A~M* 1~+~'w"'r ~ .0 G' ' % ~ ~ .:~c . ~ $R.I+Zo.55o3 r~~ ~ ~,;~t/ jt~ f~'c . . _.-R ~i 6 ~5`4 a ~ r ~ . ~ ~ ~F . ~ , , +~o ~ ~ ~ ~ ,9 ~3.,.3 f~ . . r~ i ~ ~ : N A 'oe ~ ~ N B ~ ~ i ~ ~ . _ ` ~ ~ _ r ~i ~ ~ VJ t,r ~ ~ . ~ L 7 C 3 . a ' , ~ ,A~, T`~ P A s , ti~~ - 1 ~J . ~r;~ ~ ~ '',4 ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ _ . , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . r ,.t ~ , . . ~ qn~~ ~ ~ ' *Y ` t z .,~.r e ~ 1~~ 3 1 4 ~ ( . ~~r ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ E a , Y ~ ~t .~j• 8 r ~-j- ' o Ot 1~ L ~ ' ~ _ ,`to•_ ~ " ~ C ~ o b ~,o~ 1; } ~ - /~,.r j 5$ / 4/~' 7 ~ ~ . , j-~ ~2,~~,/ 1~E..~- Q C~ ~ C R t ~ 1 ~ r . . ~ aArE pu~ED FRo~ rNtS SE~T'~N R~PRD - 6- 13•72 . r ~ S P O K A N E ,r C• O U N T Y DIVISIOU OF ENGINEERIIVG AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director March 9, 1998 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116' Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Att: Ed Dean Re: Riverwalk 2nd9` Addition: Punch list Completion Dear Ed, I am transmitting a copy of Inland Pacific Engineering Company's January 5, 1998 punch list for the above project. It is critical that all items on this list, including record drawings, be completed sb that the public roadways located within the plat can be established for County Maintenance. Sincerely, 00 L Jim Radke, P.E. Development Engineering Services cc: Bruce Howard 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 , y- ~ ;iA-1 - S P O K N E ' . C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVIS10N OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Caunty Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director 7671 DateL~/~ pa°ges~ ~ March 10, 1998 post-ito Fax Notg q From ~ To ~~r~ ~ Dean-Deily Company ColDept - , , c°. 16720 N.E. 116' Street Phone# Phone # Redmond, Washington 98052 Fax # 8,~3 Fax # _ Att: Ed Dean Re: Riverwalk 2nd8` Addition: Notification Of Intent To Take Action Against Hartford Insurance Crroup Roadway Improvement Bond #341266 (Note: The original bond number of 5094288 was revised to 341266 via rider accepted 12/20/96) „ . Dear Ed, Please be notified that all items on the above project' punch list must be completed by May 30, 1998. In the event that all items are not completed by that date, the Division of Engineering and Roads will initiate legal action against the above described instrument of surety. I am providing this notice so that you may arrange for the completion of all items prior to May 30, 1998. I have enclosed a copy of the above referenced bond for your review. . Sincerely . ~ _ ~ Jim Radke, P.E. Development Engineering Services cc: JoAnrie Tonani, Sedgwick James Of Washington~ Rob Binger, Spokane County Prosecutor's Office Bill Hemmings, Development Engineering Services Bill Johns, County Engineer Mike Klika, K.C. Construction ~ 1026 W. Broadcvay Ave. 0 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509)456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD. (509) 324-3166 cil®ry Sedgwick Sedgwick James oi Washington, Inc. 601 West Main, Suite 1400, PO Box 2151, Spokane, Washington 99210-2151 Telephone 509 358-3900. Facsimile 509 358-3937 . ~ - , , D R. oc tober 14, 1996 C T i 5 1u,46 Ed Parry SPOKANE CUIIlqTy E,JGlFlEER r Dave Bertow . Spokane C unty Publ.ic---Works Engineering Road-Division 1026 W. Broadway . Spokane, WA 99260 . Re: K. C. Construction, Inc. Subdivision Bond for Riverwalk 2nd & 3rd Additions , Gentlemen: e Enclosed please find in duplicate a rider we have issued changing the bond number for the subdivision bond we issued for K. C. Construction, Inc. Please sign the duplicate copy of this rider and return it in the enclosed self addressed stamped envelope. The original is for your file. If you have any questions, please give me a call.' Thank you. Sincerely, r . i- ~ .,1. -,l ~ : t~ ~1t :L-- ►Cc ~J Anne Tonani .ond Department , Encl. , Insurance &oking FZisk SCtviCes Employee Benelits . • . ' ` ~ . . ~ ~ . The Hartford Insuran.ce Group Hartfo: d Plaza Hartford, Conneccieut 06115 RIDER To be attached to and form part of: Bond Numoer 5094288 executed by K. C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. a s P r i n c i p a 1, a n d HAR'PFORD FZRE INSURANCE COMPANY a s S u r e t y, i n f a v o r*o f SPOKANE COUNI'Y ' and d a t e d OC,`I'OBER 7 , 19 96 . Zn consideration of the premium charged for the attached bond, it is • hereby agreed that:THE BOND NUMBER BE Cf-iANGED FROM: 5094288 T0: 341266 T;ze attached bond shall be subject to all its agreements, limitations and conditions excepC as herein expressly madified. This rider shali become effective as of the 7TH day of OCT'OBER 1996. Signed, sealed and dared this 14TH day of OC,'POBER 1996. THIS RIDER ACCEPTED ON AC VCI , 19-hG SPOKANE COUNTY, WA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERZNG/ROADS DIVISION HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY BY ' / • BY ~rL " Attorney-in-Fa::t / ~oANNE TONANI . ~ . Boad vo. 5094288 ROADwAY IlWPROvEME1vT BOND ICNOw ALL BY 'iHIF-SE PR.ESENTS, that K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. (developer), as "Principal," and UUTFORn FIRE INSURANCE COI"iPANY (bonding company), a corporation organ'rzed and existing under the laws of the Stace of Connecticut ~ and autharized to transact a surety busine:ss in the State of Washi.ngton, as "Surety," are held and firuily bound unto Spokane County, a poliacal subdivision of the State of Washington, as "Obligee," in the penal sum of . FORTY-TWo :CHOUSAND FOUR, HUNDFtED SIXTY-NINE AND 14/00-- Dollars (S 42,469.14 lawful money oE the United State of American, for the payment oE which the Principal and Surety bind thetnsetves, their heirs, ezecutors, adnninistrators, successors and assigns, jointty and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is the developer oE a tract of land in Spokane County known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS • and being located in Se+ction 08 , Township 25 Nort6, Range 45 E.W.M., in Spokane Counry, Washington, and said Couaty has required that a boad be furaished in an amount suff'icient to pay the construction cost of installing to the approved grades, curbs, sidewalks, drainage control and/or paving of roadways adjacent to said development, and such other work as in incidental and necessary thereto, all in accordance with Spokane Counry Road Department sperifications, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane Counry Engineer; such unprovements to be completed two (2):years or less time ualess said time period be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of Principal to oomply with the requirements stated herein within the time authorized, - and upon delivery of written notice thereof by Obligee to Surery, the Surety shall make satisfaction to Obligee to the excent of this Bond. Tbe obligacion of this Bond shall be kept in full force aud effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be given by the Obligee, the Obligee havi,ng sole right to gtant such release. Surery hereby waives aU rights to release from the obligatioo ezcept as herein stated. SIGNED AND SEALED this 7th dav of October , 19 96 , K.C. Construction, Inc. Principal BY: Hartford Fire Insurance Company Sure ~ BY: Lois Stewart, Attorney-in-Fact (Title) t~~rwa..Timp • WARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMP' ' IY • • Hartiord, Connectlcut . . POWER OF ATTORNEY Know all men by these Presents, That the NARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation duy organized under tfie laws of the State of Connecticut, and having its prinapal offce in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford, State of Connedicut, does hereby make, oonstitute and appant W. W. WELLLN, RICHARD W.11VRRILI, WM. DINNEEN, CHA?L£S H. STEILEN, GEORGE C. SCFIROLDE4 LOIS STEWART, LINDA TICNE}; C,ARLA HOLT, ,JOANNE TONANI snd RNONUA A. NELSON of SPOKANE, WASHINGTON its true and lawful Attomey(s)-in-Fact, with full power and eutfiority to each of said Attomey(s)-in-Fad, in their separate capaaty H more . than one is named above, to sign, execute end acknowledge any and all bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereot on behalf of the Company in fts business of guaranteeing the fidelity o1 persons holding places of puDlic or private trust; guarantee+ng the perfomnance of oontracts olfier than insurance poliaes; guaranteeing the performance of insurance conVacts where surety bands are accepted by state:s and municipalities, and exeauting or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permftted in all adions or proceed'ings or by law allowed, and to bind the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such bonds and undertakings end other writings obligatory in the nature ihereof were signed by en Executive Offrcer of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPAIJY and sealed and ettested by one other of such Officers, end hereby ratifies and corrfirms all that its saEd Attomey(s)-in-Fact may do in pursuance hereoi. This power of attomey is grented by and under authority of the following provisions: (1) By-Laws adopted, by the Stodcholders of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duty qlled and held on the 9th day of March, 1971. - • ARTICLE IV SECTION 8. The President or any Vioe-President, ading with amr Seuetary or Assistant Secretary, ahall have power and authority to aapoint for purposes ony of execu6ng end attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, one or more Residertt Vm Preaidents, Residerrt Asaistartt Secrotaries and Atlomeys-in-Fact and at any time to remova any such Resident We-PresldeM, ReaideM Assistant Seaetary, or Attomey-in-Fed, and rovoke the power and authority given tc him. SECTION 11. Attomeys-In-Fad shall have power and authority, subject to the terms and limitations of the pcswer of attomey isaued to them, to exeaute end deliver on behaM of Uhe Company and to ettach the seal of the Gomparry tharoto any and all bonds artd undeRakings, and other writings obligatory in the natute ttxrool, and arry auch instrumant executed by any auch Attomey-in-Fact ahall be as binding upon tAe Cortiparry as H aigned by an_ Ezecutive Offsoer and seakd and attested by one oiher of auch Officers. This power of attomey is signed and sealed by facsirMle under and by tfie authority of the follawing Resolution adopted by the Directors of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY at a meeting duly plled and held on the 12th day of February, 1993. aesarea. Mn,e sronanra a eua, offmra eno a,e aW a an company mar ee etfaea ro sM wa, pow a attome.y a ro any aereincaee rel~p u,e.m ey faaim'k, and arry wdi power d etiomey a oertilfcafe Dearirq sudh bcskrile signahms ot tacskNle seal aliaEl De va6d and binQ'a~p upon ft Compnny an0 eny weA power so exearted and aeAMed Oy isnJmib 94na0m end EaealmHe seel ahae De vaUd and Clndin0 upon the Company fn the fuhae wfe► reapect to any bond a undertakinp Io whid~ il Es tCacl~e4. - In Witmeaa Whereof, the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be signed by its Vioe- Pr+esident, and its corperate seal te be hereM affuced, duty attested by its Secretary, this 1st day of May, 1995. Atbast HARTFORD FlRE INSURANCE COMPANY , • AI0fef'd A. f'bfR1wSOf1 /4 w rr . ~ STATE OF CONNECTICUT Sopotwy ,s, Paul L. Marabelta COUNTY OF HARTFOAO Vice-Pmsldettf On this 1st day of May, A.D. 1995, before me personafiy came Paul L. Marabella, to me known, who being by me dufy swom, did depose and say: that he resides in the County of Hartford, State of Connecticut; that he is the Yoe-Presidern of ihe HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, the Cotporat'tan descxibed in and which executed the above instntment; that he knows Me seat of the said corporation; that the seal aifixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affuced by order of the Board of Diredors of said corporation end that he signed his name thereto by like order. (nZ3,"o, STATE OF CONNECTICUT 69&4,%- COUNTY OF HARTFORD Mr ComxrtiasioEeseft.luns 30. 1M GERTIFI CATE ' I, the undersigned, Secretary of the HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connedicut Corporetion, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached POWER OF ATTORNEY remains in fup torce and has not been revoked; and furttiertnore, that the Resolutions of the Boanf of Directors, set forth in the Power of Attomey, are naw in foroe. Sigrted and sealed at the City of Hartford. Dated the 7th day of OCtOb2r 1996 RobeR L Pbst Seerttaly Form 5-3507•9 (HF) Printed in U.S.A. r + • - ' , • + r . . . . ~ , • 'e~_ - 5 ' ' ' , ' 4• . • . . , e. - 'y D,... - , . . , • ' I , + ' i' . - . ' ' , . . - : . Bond No. 5094288 The Hartford Insurance Group . " . Hartford Plaza - ^ Hactford, Connectlcut 06115 SUBDTVISION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY -THESE PRESENTS that K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. (CONTRA.CTOR), as "Principal", and HA.RTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY (bonding company), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut, as "Surety", are held and firmly bound unto Spokane County, a political subd.ivision of the State of . Washington, as "Obligee", in the penal sum of FORTY-TWO THOUSAND, FOUR HRJNDRED SLXTY NINE & 14/100 DOLLARS ($42,469.14), lawful money of the United States of America, for the payment of which the Principal and Surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly.and severally firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, said Principal is a contractor to the Developer of a tract of land in Spokane County divided and platted into Iots and known as RIVERWALK SUBDIVISION, 2ND AND 3RD ADDITIONS, and being'located in Spokane County, Washington, and said County has required ' that a bond be furnished in. an amount sufficient to pay the construction costs of grading and surfacing to the approved grades and typical section of the roadways of said P1at and the installation of drainage structures and such other work as is incidental and necessary thereto, aIl in accordance with the Contract Documents between Principal and Developer dated September 6, 1995, and those Plat Roadway Improvement Specifications and plans dated October 31, 1995, and to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Engineer. Such improvement reached substantial completion on or about October 1, 1996; however, such date may be extended at the option of the Spokane County Engineer. Upon failure of the Principal to comply with the requirements stated herein within the time . authorized, and upon delivery of the written notice thereof of Obligee to Surety, the Surety shall be obliged to the Obligee up to the penal sum of this Bond. The obligation of this Bond shall be kept in full force and effect until, in the opinion of the Obligee, the requirements herein stated have been satisfied, in which event written release will be . given by the Obligee, the Obligee having sole right to grant such release. SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED this 2ND day of October, 1996. . PRINCIPAL SURETY K.C. CONSTRUCTION, INC. EkRTFORD FIRE INSURANCE CrJMPANY B Y. By. Its Pres,- den W.W. WELLER, Attorney-in-Fact i CONSTRUCTION STATUS PROJECT NAME At'rl 4 20 bId PROJECT SITE ADDRBSS #LOTS , #ACRES PARCEL # ROAD NAMES SPONSOR CONSTR. ]3NGR. NAME NAME C4MPANY COMPANY ADDRESS ADDRFSS CITY CITY STATE/ZIP STATE/ZIP PHONE / f ax PHpNE / f ax eMAIL eMAIL PERMITS ISSUED PERMIT # DATE DATE TO SCOPE ~ ~ ~ . . DATE ITEM INTITALS ' Insp Bond qtv: Posted: Construction Started: Completed: Certification Documents Submitted: Accepted: Final Inspection (all Punchlist items complete) Inspection Bond Released: Construction Bond Released: fdr X(J( o Co. 694- A;"PT-15 "*jUrjW e spi I NfN 1b U r I ~Mqtj X kc 2) ~i- i,51~'j 44 f( Z Cti,,T ~ I ~ S P O K A N E ~ C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. 5cott, P.E., Director October 18, 1996 K. C. Construction P.O.Box 1455 Hayden Lake, ID 83 83 5 Att: Mike Klicka Re: Riverwalk PUD 2nd Addition Dear Mike, Please be advised that the Construction Division accepts the yuality of construction of the following system components: All mainline sewer pipe, manholes, and side-service stub-outs located beneath paved roadways within the platted boundaries of R.iverwalk PUD 2rd Addition. The above acceptance will allow the Conty Utilities Department to establish a one year warranty period. Utilities will begin this period when all as-built drawings, O& M manuals, easements, and other related system components have been satisfactorily provided. Any additional defects observed in the system during the warranty period will be brought to your attention by the Spokane County Utilities Department. ~ Very Truly Yours v . ~ Z7James Radke, P.E. Construction Engineer ~ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, VVA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD {509} 324-3166 , ~ U ~ . INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEEE November 18, 1998 IPE W.O. #95617 . Spokane County Engineering Department 1026 W. Broadway S ' Spokane, Wa. 99260-0170 Sa-rr . ~ Ln n.~, . i Re: R.iverwalk 2nd Addition Punch list Completion and Surety Bond Dear Bill, I am enclosing copies of four letters for your review. The first letter dated March 10, 1998 is . from your office to K.C. Construction concerning the punchlist items and surety bond. As you can see the punchlist items included in the package were supposed to be done by March 30, 1998, or Spokane County would take action against the bond securing the completion of the project. Because of the problems with the plat sponsor, K.C. Construction Company posted the bonds for this project. 'To date no action by K.C. Construction to complete this project has occurred. Some punchlist items have been taken care of at the expense of Iriland Pacific Engineering in good faith that we would be reimburse for our actions. No punchlist items or other activities have been recorded or inspected by IPE to date. As you are aware this project is the stumbling block for a11 other projects that come after the 2nd Addition. Until Riverwalk 2"d Addition is accepted by Spokane County, Riverwalk 6Ih can not be accepted, and Riverwalk 8`hcan not move forward. The completion of the punchlist items on Riverwalk 2nd Addition has stopped progress on other developers and landowners. Is Spokane County going to take action against the bond for Riverwalk 2°d Addition? I have clients who have large financial investments hinging on the actions of Spoka.ne County concerning this issue. Our suggestion would be to claim the bond, perform the work, and move on so other projects do not pay the price for non action of a irresponsible developer and contractor. I would like to discuss this issue at greater length at your convenience. Please call with any question, or to set up a meeting time for closure of this issue. ~ r ~ ~ - Riverwalk 2"d Addition page 2 Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Bruce A. Howard Principal enc. cc: Mike Hume, Tomlinson Black Doug Birch, Pacific Properties Tom Anderl, Shorewood Homes Mike.Klika, K.C. Construction Ed Dean, Dean Housley Brett Sullivan, Sullivan Homes Todd Whipple, Inland Pacific Engineering Mark Albin, A.M. Irrigation ~ . ~a S~ P O K A N E C O U N T Y _ , . DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME\iT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director m+~ PM JON March 10, 1998 'A dJJ5(-A -4" CC: Ust Inftiats K. C. Construction Co. ~ P.O. Box 1455 Hayden Lake, ID 83 83 5 ~ ~ Att: Mike Klika Re: Riverwalk Z"d Addition: Punch List Completion & Surety Bond Dear Mike, . . I am enclosing copies of three letters for your review. The first letter is a copy of Inland . Pacific Engineering Company's punch list letter to Ed Dean dated January 5, 1998. The . second letter is my letter to Ed Dean dated March 9, 1998 referring to this punch list. The third is a copy of a letter dated March 10, 1998 indicating that all punch list items must be completed by May 30, 1998 or the County will take action against the bond securing the completion of the project. Since the bond names K.C. Construction Company as Principal, I am transmitting the letters as formal notification of the Engineering Department's intention in this matter. Please understand that the intent of this action is to get this project 100% completed, the roads established, and ultimately to get this project finalized for everyone that has had the experience of being involved with it. . Sincerely, ~ . ) Jim Radke, P.E. Development engineering Services c Bruce Howar , Inland Pacific Engineering 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 0 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAY: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 Iq -7-, A INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, • • ~ 1 • ~ lf; 9 . • % January 5, 1998 ' + W.O. 95617 • , ,r~"✓~ ~v/ ~F fR Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. i 16th Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Attn: Ed Dean Re: Riverwalk P.U.D. 2nd Addition, Walk Through and Punchlist Dear Ed, - At your request we met Monday morning November 24, 1997 on site to participate in a inspection walk through. Present at the meeting were; Jim Radke - Spokane County Engineers Office, . Allen Arnold - Artistic Landscape, Todd Whipple - Inland Pacific Engineering, Bruce Howard - Inland Pacific Engineering, Ed Dean - Dean- Deily Company The following deficient items were noted for correction prior to final acceptance by Spokane County. This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved or are approvable under current County Standards. By copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the issues listed below. Please contact as the deficiencies zre being co:rected, so that •yve can proceed 'With the p:cject certification and acceptance 'uy Spokane County in a timely manner. * As-built pond volume calculations need to represent actual depth of constructed ponds, not the assumed .5' depth noted in original submittal calculations. (IPE) * Remove filter fabric from all frame and grates in ponds with established grass. * The cracks between the sidewalk and the back of curb wili have to be cleaned, sprayed with herbicide, and injected with epoxy or grout mortar to stop the effects of freeze/ thaw cycles. (Typical throughout 2°d Addition.) * One cracked panel of sidewalk on the south side of Indiana at the ls` and 2nd Addition boundary will have to be removed and replaced 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Onve • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, lD 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 Walk Through Punchlist . ~ page 2 * Sweep and clean all streets and sidewalks. * Remove and re-install the mailbox cluster per the U. S. Postal Service requirements. * Install street and stop sign per the plan set and M.U.T.C.D.. (Typical all intersections.) * Finish grade, install irrigation, adjust rim elevations to match the plan set, and seed or sod ponds B, E. and F3: Provide as-built drawings, and O& M manuals for the irrigation system suitable for Spokane County acceptance. * Remove all curb, sidewalk, and pavement associated with the temporary turn-around and replace with a standard street cross section. (Indiana Avenue sta. 17+90 to 19+08, south) *.Remove and replace the driveway panels at E. 19122 Indiana, install driveway drop per Spokane County detail A-7. * Remove and replace one panel of sidewalk at the same address. Should you have any questions regarding this information please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering . . ~ Bruce A. Howard . Frinc:pal cc: Jim Radke, Spokane County - ■ - - - S P O K A N E ~ e C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERIIVG AND ROADS ~ A DIVISION OF THE PUBL[C WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director March 10, 1998 Dean-Deily Company - 16720 N.E. 116' Street ~ . Redmond, Washington 98052 ~ Att: Ed Dean Re: Riverwalk 2nds` Addition: Notification af ln'ient To Take Action Against tIartforci Insurance Group Roadway Improvement Bond #341266 (Note: The original bond number of 5094288 was revised to 341266 via rider accepted 12/20/96) ' Dear Ed, ~ Please be notified that all items on the above project' punch list must be completed by May 30, 1998. In the event that all items are not completed by that date, the Division of ° Engineering and Roads will initiate legal action against the above described instrument of surety. I am providing this notice so that you may arrange for the completion of all items prior to May 30, 1998. I have enclosed a copy of the above referenced bond for your review. Sincerely ~ . , ~ . Jim Radke, P.E. Development Engineering Services cc: JoAnne Tonani, Sedgwick James Of Washington Rob Binger, Spokane County Prosecutor's Office Bill Hemmings, Development Engineering Services Bill Johns, County Engineer Mike Klika, K. C. Construction . 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(5a9) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 ~ - - . . ~ i S P O K A N E ~ C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AI`TD ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director March 9, 1998 Dean-Deily Company 16720 N.E. 116' Street Redmond, Washington 98052 Att: Ed Dean Re: Riverwalk 2nd°' Acidition: Punch list Compietion Dear Ed, . I am transmitting a copy of Inland Pacific Engineering Company's January 5, 1998 punch list for the above project. It is critical that all items on this list, including record drawings, - be completed so that the public roadways located within the plat can be established for County Maintenance. Sincerely, . - ~ ~ ~ Jim Radke, P.E. Development Engineering Services cc: Bruce Howard 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane,lNA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 4 ' • r , ~ i 1 1 V ~ n S P O K A N E O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER • A DMSIOfV OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ' Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director March 3, 1995 Michael Hunt North Idaho Engineering 4200 Seltice Way, Suite 2 Coeur d' Alene, ID 83814 ~ N SUBJECT: rP1414A - Riverway Villa P.U.D., phase 2 P1414B - Riverway Villa P.U.D., phase 3 Completion of Preliminary Artions Prior to Plan Submittal Gentlemen: We have recently received several submittals of plans and calculations for these projects, and I note that as of March 1, 1995, the Traffic Impact Analyses for these phases of the project have not yet been initiated, much less completed. I would like to draw your attention to the Conditions of Approval for this Plat. The Conditions of Approval from the Division of Engineering and Roads from the most recent time extension reads: "1. All previously imposed conditions are still applicable. "3. As per the original conditions of approval: "A traffic analysis will be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County prior to plat finalization. This analysis will be coordinated with t6e Washington State Department of Transportation. A traffic analysis for each phase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Should the analysis determine a need for intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for the required improvements. "4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for phased finalization of the plat the aforementioned aualysis shall be completed. "(emphasis ours) 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (~09) 324-3166 . ~ . P1414A - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 2 P1414B - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 3 Completion of Preliminary Actions Prior to Plan Submittal March 2, 1995 Page 2 of 3 It is quite clear that the Conditions of Approval require the Traffic Impact Analysis to be coordinated with WSDOT; further reading of the original conditions indicates that WSDOT will have the final say as to the adequacy of the analysis and any required mitigation on the part of the developer. This affects both Phase 2 and Phase 3 of this plat. As you have been informed by Mr. Parry of our office, the term "completed" means that the submitted work meets the requirements of the agencies having jurisdiction, and that no further revisions to the submitted work are necessary; "completed" does not mean that the required work has been merely submitted to the reviewing agency (or agencies). If that were the case, then any submittal to our offce could be considered "complete" . As a result of our meeting in July 1994, in which we discussed the Traffic Impact Analysis requirements for phase 1, we understood that NIE would ensure that the proper sequence of Traffic Impact Analysis and plan submittal would be followed; that is, the Traffic Impact Analysis for a particular phase would be completed to the satisfaction of the WSDOT prior to the submittal of any road and drainage plans for that phase. I would also draw your attention to the fact that the P.U.D. Approval for the portion of this plat located north of Indiana has not yet occurred; this affects Phase 2. Given the status of both the required P.U.D. Approval and the required Traffic Impact Analyses, we will not review these submittals until all the required preliminary actions are completed. It is a misuse of the time of the County plan review staff, and the Developer's money, to review plans which are very likely to change due to land use requirements, or due to traffic impacts before the land use requirements and traffic impacts have been finalized. We will not assign these projects a location in the plan review priority list, as that would unfairly penalize those Developers who have completed all the necessary preliminary requirements prior to submittal of their road and drainage plans. ^ A u - , P1414A - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 2 P1414B - Riverway Villa P.U.D., Phase 3 Completion of Preliminary Actions Prior to Plan Submittal March 2, 1995 Page 3 of 3 So that these submittals do not become misplaced while the Traffic Impact Analysis and the P.U.D. Approval are being completed, we request that you retrieve these submittals until all the applicable preliminary actions are completed. The plans and calculations for these submittals are available for your pickup at the Engineer's Reception counter in the Public Works Building. If you have any other questions in these matters, please contact us at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, . ~ ~ William H. Hemmings, P. E. Development Services Administrator cci/roject file reviewer Spokane County Public Works Director - Dennis Scott, P.E. Spokane County Engineer - Ron Hormann, P.E. Spokane County Engineer's Office - Gary Kennaly, P.E. Spokane County Planning Deparcment - Wally Hubbard Jon Peterson Spokane County Prosecutor's Office - Ron Arkills Developer: Scanton Spokane Limited Partnership, ATTN: Edward Dean, 16720 NE 116th, Redmond WA 98052 FAX COVER SHEET. `Spokane County Engineer's Office - Third Floor Fax # 324-3478 1026 W BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 - PHONE #(509) 456-3600 DATE: - I Atf.-I q6 FAX ZDa1664' 75~07 . To: AW. Kk5t. RUt-Jt . coMPANY NoLOR xnAvO CITY / STATE: CoQ49 Q` AC.t-LJ6 ~ . NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER SHEE'I): FR,OM: Eb 'PAL61 MESSAGE /SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: 3 . INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TR.ANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: 45~b. cc> DATE: a.7r ~S . M45-00 PROJECT ` ATTENTION: PROJECT NAME: w- / Description FleoBlueline Pnnts M Copy of Letter Original Drawing <Contract Documents ef/ft2E!S M~ M~ Work Authorization M"~'I~Zeport , No. Copies Description Pl1TpOSe r"~ I ormation I" ~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request ritten Approval M~ Signature 8z Return M~ Remarks . . Tr> 74`47- efT' AL1 a+w-' ! a~- pCT 2 51995 ; ° - • ' Signed: d5 1,041 d5-~~ SppKpii NEED BY: / Y j�.S , FILE: RED FILE () FLAT FILE ( ) OTHER • MAIL: REGULAR () UPS () - FAX: TO: DELIVER: TO: COPY: ORIGINALS TO: !!.. .; : :, ::;>==;<:..:: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: / '" `:.:::-y fi:�:::: • • `f:. ► ~ J ERING - TRANSMITT~►L ~ ND PACIFIC ENGINE : ~ ~ ~ kane, WA (509)458-~a F~(~)4~ 707 W. Tth Avenue, Suite 200 Spo _ • ~ • . • . ; : . ~ ; • • • • . : _ . . :;:•:t'•v'' •'•;v - _•:i~~'~~,~~ , 'v~i,• , • . vS. ir> :-:;tt•:$$: , c'~r.... .:r.... SPOKA } :v• r,::: • ENGINEER - . NTY .:.:.....rrr:.::::;::.:: - OU - . C NE T0. . }ti~ ti N .•:J . 1. . T . •f; I~~~:•.~:.:~::..._;.:::"~.::ti:~. •'~..~~~~~~~T: , . r:%'.~,' ry 1j'~ ..lC1y::.i:.:• : '~•J: •l.Y: ~ ~r.'J~ti•: . Per . Ed N: 10 T '~i:.: •.fi: • E TT A . k•.._....,.,~:.,-::.~ N51 - . ~'•`..'[~'-'~t'~,• . `.I; . ~ rn•:<-::<~ ' PROJEC , -::::.:r,.::. ~ :~~k-:<:~::=~:::~::~ ` :;-r.~•.• ::fi.::: ~ . ; : 1414A T P ~ ~'f: . . . Description: p Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter ~ C] Original Drawing t] Contract Dacumevts ~ p Report ■ Declaration of Co No. Copies Description 1 proposed Dpclaratipn of Covemint ~ Purpose p lnformation ■ Review & Comments ❑ Per Your R6quest , p Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return 0 Remarks Ed - Enclosed please find the combine Declaration of Covenants for above referenced project. the roads and drainage easement o he roval. if ou have review and advise if this m ets with your app Y Please any questions, please do not he itate to contact this office. Signed: , . ~ d. _ . _ RF c ~ti v r~ . DEC 0 41995 ~ SPOKANE GOU.N"ti' EtNGtNEER ' . • i/ / ''~~~~~I ~ DECLARATION nF COVENANT In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of RIVERWALK SECOND ADDITION (hereinafter refened to as the "Plat"), the undersigned covenants and agrees that: 1. The subdivider/sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the CountyEngineer's Office. 2. A lot is served by the private road when: (a) the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the private road; or (b) a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the private road. 3. THE RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or its successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office. 4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Plat or alteration thereof and served by a private road shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities, in conromance with approved plans on file with the Counry Engineer's Office. 5. Maintenance finanang of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner determined by RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest. 6. Should RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION be terminated for any reasons, the successors in interest shall be the ind.ividual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION at the time of said termination. 7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilides is improved to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication. 8. Owners of lots within the Plat who are served by such road, may sue and recover damages and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Plat which is similarly served who refuses to participate in the road and drainage facalities construction, 6nancing, and maintenance. 9. WARNIlVG: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise service the private roads and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property described in this Plat. By accepting this Plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal on a private road or its associated drainage facxlities. 10. Spokane County is hereby granted the right of ingress and egress to all private roads and/or drainage easement, for the purpose of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, and any other drainage facilities, if not property maintained by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does the County accept any liability for failure by the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest to progerly maintain such areas. il. The lot owners within this Plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across the'u respective properties. 12. The lot owner or his representative shall inform each succeeding purchaser of all drainage easement on the property and of his responsibility for mai.ntaining surface drainage paths and swales within said easements. 1 I ` • I 13. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIAT'ION, or their successors in interest, shall mai.ntain all water quality treatment swales ("ZOg" swales") and drainage ditches situated within this Plat, and any portion of a 208 swale situated in the public right-of-way adjacent to this Plat, with a permanent ground cover as specified on the current approval plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. The RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, or their successors in interest, may install approved shrubbery and/or trees which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the 208 swales and drainage ditches, as indicated by the current approved plans on file with the County Engineer's Office. 14. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, includi.ng but not limited to inverse +condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. 15. Whenever the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIA'I'ION or their successors in interes( fail to maintaia the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice of such failure may be given to the RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest, by the County. If not conected within the period ind.icated on said notice, the County has the right to conect the maiatenance failure or to have it corrected at the expense of the Homeowner's Assoeiation, or their successors in interest. 16. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this Plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a windovc► well, a window unproteded by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a dastance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swales or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lots is di.sposes of on the Iot in an approved drainage facility. The approved drainage fac:ility shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the County Engineer's Office. Any revisions to the approved drainage plans must be approved by the County Engi.neer's Office prior to construction of said revisions. 17. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding ugon the owner, their heirs, successors or assigns, including the obligation to partiapate in the maintenance of the private road and drainage facilities as provided herein. Dated this day of STAIVTON-SPOKANE L.P., A Washington Limited Partnership BY: STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A Washington General Partnership ITS General Partner BY: HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORpORATION, A Washington Corporation, Partner BY: ITS BY: DEAN BUILDING CORPORATION, A Washington Corporation Partner BY: I'I'S 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of ) On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the of DF?AN BUII..DING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss County of ) On this day of , 19 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, personally appeared , to me known to be the of HOUSLEY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation, and partner of STANTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a Washington General Partnership who is the General Partner of STANTON- SPOKANE L.P., a Washington Limited Partnersbip that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said partnership, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authori'zed to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation. Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane My commission expires 3 t . S P O K A N E O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENG1NEfiR • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director November 13, 1995 Inland Pacific Engineering Inc. 707 W. 7th Suite 200 Spokane WA 99204 Riverwalk 2nd Addition Bruce: The Spokane County Engineering Department has completed the "Fatal Flaw" of the submittal as per the letter dated Nov 8th. The County did not observe any major discrepancy from the standards which would affect the construction/acceptance process of the roads and drainage. If you have any questions, please . call. . William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer D.~• Edward J. , .E. Plan Review Engineer cc: file 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 Post-it° Fax Note 7671 Date '2,~ 9 a°ges~ ~ To From Co./Dept: T ~/Gc Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # GE L ~ I Fax # ~ November 8, 1995 Todd Whipple, P. E. IPEC SUBJECT: P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Submittal Accepted Gentlemen: We have conducted a general evaluation of your recent submittal for this project, and we find that this submittal appears to meet the minimum standards of the Svokane Countv Standards or Road and Sewer Construction ("SCRS We are, therefore, able to accept your approval of the plans and calculations for this project. I am enclosing a sepia print of your approved road and drainage plans for this project: the originals are on file at the Public Works Department. A copy of your approved drainage calculations is also enclosed. In accordance with Section 5.02.D of tbe SCRS, this acceptance valid until October 30, 1995. If the facilities are not constructed, you may request an extension of the acceptance for an additional two years; the plans shall be revised to reflect current standards prior to granting the extension. Please note: 1. The County's acceptance of this submittal does not relieve the sponsor or his agents ftom any liability related to portions of the design that are not in conformance with the SCRS, or which do not follow good engineering practice; 2. All permits and notifications necessary prior to construction are the responsibility of the project Sponsor and/or his assigned agents; and 3. The County will not accept the improvements to be constructed under this project until (a) all construction documentation and certified Record Drawings have been submitted and accepted; and (b) all construction deficiencies noted in the County's Acceptance Inspection have been corrected. 4. Per our meeting on October 25, 1995, surety for the construction of the improvements indicated on the project plans will not be accepted. The Final Plat will not be approved by the County Engineer's Office until such time as these improvements have been accepted by the County Engineer's Office. Record Drawings and Construction Documents must be submitted to the County Engineer's Office, and accepted by the County, prior to the joint Acceptance Inspection upon completion of construction. P1414A - Riverwalk 2nd Addition Submittal Accepted November 8, 1995 Page 2 of 2 5. Per our October 30, 1995 meeting, a"fatal flaw" check of the plans and calculations has not yet been accomplished. The County will conduct a"fatal flaw" check and advise you of the results. As you agreed at this meeting, any "fatal flaws" uncovered by our check will be corrected prior to the County's acceptance of the improvements indicated on the project plans. If you have any questions, please contact Ed Parry at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, William A. Johns, P. E. Acting Spokane County Engineer Edward J. Parry, Jr., P. E. Plan Review Engineer encls: Plans (1 sheet) - sepia Drainage Calculations cc: project file Pat Harper Dave Berto Permit Technician - Sylvia Lightfoot reviewer Project Sponsor: Dean Housley Company (Verne Jacobsen) ~,c~,°~'-,g ~e, ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. May 16, 1996 I.P.E. W.O. #95617 Dean-Housley Building Corporation 16720 N.E. 116th Street . Redmond, Washington 98052 ATTN: Mr. Verne Jacobsen, Superintendent SUeJECT: Constsuction Deficiency List Riverwalk 2nd Addition ? (4- 4.4" Spokane County, Washington Dear Verne: This letter transmits a list of constructed items for the above referenced residential development that are currently in non-conformance with approved project plans and specifications and applicable Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. These items must be corrected prior to preparation of project record -drawings, and prior to calling for final inspection and approval of the construction by the County Engineer's office. This letter is based on items observed during a site visit on 10 May 1996, and is limited to areas of the improvements whose adequacy could be visually determined at the time of our visit. This letter is an addendum to our Apri{ 12 and May 7, 1996 letters regarding deficiencies in Riverwalk 2nd Addition construction. DRAINAGE PONDS The five stormwater retentionldisposal ponds (A,B,C,E,F3) have three non-conforming itenis in comrnon: * ~ Pond bottoms not flat. 0,1 * Some topsoil, no landscaping (sod or hydroseed) or irrigation installed. * Irregular pond bottoms and 3:1 sideslopes not met. POND A * Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk must be completed. b+JkA ; ~ f 1,.,A. ( &W,~.- ~ . .rAY 1 7 1996 707 West 7th • suice 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • suice 205 , SPOKANE ~OUNIY 001NEER Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 • 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 Riverwalk 2nd Addition . Deficiency List #3 Page 2 of 3 - POND B * Pipe from inlet structure in pond to drywell under sidewalk is not at design grade. This pipe as installed is flat. * Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk must be completed. POND C * Grouting of pipe into drywell under sidewalk must be completed. ~O POND E S~ ~ POND F3 r`J/ ~ u~ rr * Pond not to plan dimensions (65ft x 11ft, no 10ft radius corner in south end, less than 5ft horizontal sideslope distance). * Inadequate elevation difference between gutter line at inlet and drywell grate (0.18 vs. 0.50 ft). ~G ADDITIONAL ITEMS * Temporary cutoff swales should be constructed as shown in the plans to keep sediment laden stormwater from running into the street. " Areas aiong indiana Avenue where curb drops were constructed subsequent to AC paving support smears of gutter concrete on the asphalt pavement, resulting in a non-conforming finish. * All roadway sections on the plans indicate a 5' flat area directly adjacent to and behind the curb or sidewalk. Additionally, this area should be vibratory compacted to insure adequate compaction for these same soils and to minimize any voids created during the utility installation process. , • Riverwalk 2nd Addition Deficiency List #3 Page 3 of 3 This list of observed deficiencies in project construction is intended to serve as input to help you achieve project acceptance by Spokane County. The absence of constructed items from this list in no way implies that any unlisted item(s) have been approved/are approvable under current County Standards. Our preparation of this letter in no way releases the contractor from his responsibility for constructing the improvements per approved project plans and specifications, and applicable sections of the current Spokane County Standards. By a copy of this letter, we are notifying the County Engineer's staff that we have requested compliance on the above issues. Please contact us when the above deficiencies have been corrected, so that we can proceed with the project certification and acceptance by Spokane County in a timely manner. Respectfully Submitted, _ INLAND PACIF C ENGINEERING ~ Jer E. Weterson, P. E. Project Engineer ~ cc: Bill Johns, ou ' y Engineer, Spokane County Public Works Ed Par Plan Review Engineer, Spoka County Public Work•s Jim R dke, Construction En9ineer, SP6kane CountY Public Works Terry Lightfoot, Chief Inspector, Spokane County Public Works Ed Dean, Dean Housley Company a:1956171defc1st3 wpf pppppp, 7 ~ INL.AND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 To: '54bKMJF, DATE: IO I.P.E. PROJECT ~ ~CO I~ ~CO ~ - PROJECT NAME: ATTENTION : KL~ ~ • ~ - A0 t>05 Description M~Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing Contract Documents M~ M ~ Work Authorization M~ Regort M~ No.' opie Description C ~ADAtoL? f Cc.Aj595cF-t~Ane0J 1Re',LT5 Purpose Mi Information l-J Review & Comments f~Per Your Request M~ Written Approval L-J Signature & Return Remarks RECE1VEO , r T! 2 ~ l445 SpOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER Signed: ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~tAr'~~ s ~ ~ . t(4 `r ~G~