24873 PE-1414J
: -
ProJcct Status Act;ve ENGINEER'S REVIE'VV SHEET
As Built Ylaits Reccived Piats File PE-1414J -81
Road Plans Approved Companion Files: ZE-0092-51 PUDE-0001-82
New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar
Related Files:
Hearing: Building Dept:
Technical Review:
Harvard Rd Plan
Preliminaiy Keview: Type: i ~
Large Lot Dldg. Square Feet
Date Received: 06/26/2001
No. Lots: 20 No. Acres: 4.97
Project Name RIVERWALK 11TH ADD
Site Address E. HARMONY, N. MICHIL'LLI, S. MONTGOMERY, W. RIO GRANDE,
Range-Township-Section: 45 - 25 - 08 PARCEL(S): (first 20)
Conditions Mailed: 55083.9073
Floud Zone
Water Source
Sewer Source
School Dist
Firc Dist
Phone Dist
Eng Billing Owncr
Craig C& Linda Condron T'om Andrel
SHOItEW00D HOMES
7205 W. Kendick Rd 3901 Schreiber Wy Surveyor
Patrick J Moore
NINE MILC EALLS, WA 99026- COEUR D ALENF, ID 83814- CLC ASSOCIATES [NC Ahone (509) 467-8096 (509) 325-4865 Phone (208) 665-9400 707 W. 7th Av, 200
Fax (509) 467-8089 SPOKANL, WA 99204
lindacondron@hotmail.com Phone (509) 458-6840
Signed Name: CRAIG C CONDRON Fax (509) 458-6844
Building 477-3675 lPlanning 477-7200 /Engineer 477-3640 Contact B/P .IASON LANG8E1-IN Contact En~ SCO'I"T ENGELHARD
Date Submitted Description Initials
Eng Need Techmcally Complete Eng Need Harvard Rd MitigAtion
Eng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Traffic Analysis Eng Need Other
06/19/2001 Eng Agree Pay Fees Received 06/21/2001 Eng Final Plat Fees Completed
Copy to Accountmg
Eng Agree Priority fees Reccived Eng Prelim Plat Fees Completed
Notice to Public / Notice to Public # 1 3 4 6 Completed - or Needs to be signed
Design Deviation Dates (In-Out)
73ond quantieT
drAinage item calculated
Hearing Uate Decision App Den Cond Appld BCC
Appealed to BCC Decision App Den Cond Appld Court
Appealed to Court Decision App Den Cond Appld
Stamped Mylars to Secretary (Sandy)
Stamped 208 Lot Plans to Secretary (Sandy)
~ - - - - _
--C,-a -7
G nG
'i i~--~.A01---- pre• desv1 rr-hr1a w+th Muunph4(G l..G")
Re.ce(qec~ _ 5rntnw, ~ ~ . - - - - - GQG
.
a, Oa. _ ~~r_1~~s~► ~~W ~c~!''--~ ~ . _ - GbG
4 Ac, - ~ -
a-~-~-- - ~
t~j18 ~Rreceivcd SUbmox*o-~ GAC.
(a~-'tS
~ Q.5 0 Sent'_ rev tew letter *c%. - - - - G ~G
5 i o~. ReCC'~~ec~ cc~~2s ~~aCCQ i~ r0~'~_dr.a►~l~ IC~c.r~S coC.~
- ~ ~ ~
~ %J ^
~ -
~
. i
+ • D k i/
'S ~ _
0~.~ (l
C)
BrC'ORE TIIE SPOKANE COUN'I'Y DIVI ION OF PLANNING
lN THE MATTER OF AN El XTENSIQN OF ) - ~
TI11'IE REQUEST TOR PE-1414-81/
PUAE-1-82 / ZE-92-819 ) FINDINGS OI' FACT, ' f
12iVERWALK, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND ,
PRELIMINARY PLAT, PLANNED UNIT ) DECISION
Dr'VrLOPMTNT AND ZONE
RECLASSIFICATION ) l
~d. ~,u 1
TI-((S MATTCR, a request for an extensioli of time from C& L Development, LLC has been received ancl
decicled upon, pursuant to the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Section 12.100.1 18) and RCW
58.17.140.
I'INDINGS OT FACT
l. The individuai signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for re»derinb this
decision by the Snokaiie County Director of Building and Pianning. '
2. 1'lie original develop►»ent proposal was to subdivide approximately 118 acres into 364 lots for
i»anufactured homes, sinsle family residences and a single commercia) lot. The originll proposal
aIso inc(ucied a zone reclassification frot» Agricultural (A) to Residential Ivlaiiufactured Home
(RMH) witli a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay zone and to Commercial (C) under the
now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
3. The subject preliminary nlat, zone reclassification and Planned Unit Development (AUD) were
approved by the Hearing Examiner Conunittee on Apri12, 1982. The revised prelirninary plat and
PUD were approved on June 16, 1995.
4. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-
3.5) previously establislled as Agricultura! (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE-286-57) and redesignated to
Urbaii Resiciential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January l, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the
Spokane County Zoniiig Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to ihe
requirernents of tlie pronosed Urban Resiciential-7 (UR-7) zone.
5. Snakane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the
expiration af preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Sectiori 12.100.118 af the
Spokane Couiity Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decisioii.
Section 12.100.116 states, "Approval of a preliminlry subdivision, large lot subdivisions, sliort
, subciivisions, atid binding site plans shall automatically expire five years after preliminary
. approval is granted unless a time extension is approved for tlie project." and Section 12.100.1 18
follows with "The Director may admiiiistrative(y approve an extension provided there are i1o
significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat or binding site p(an contrary
to tlie nublic healtli, safety or general welfare, aiid furthei• provided one or more oF the FolloNving
circumstances is fourid to apply:"
Tlie followind are the relevaiit sections af Section 12.100.1 18 and lhe Division of Plaiiniiib
responses.
Pl:inning responsc:
1. That some portion of the existing preliminary subdivision or binding site plan 1ias been finalized
since the project was approved and the remainins lots would form a unified development
consistent witli the origiiial approval;
RTSP4NSE: The Iast exteilsian of time was approved May 19, 1999 and ten pliases of the preliminary
plat have been finalized since the preliminary plat was origina(ly approved.
Riverwalk Pirst Addition
Riverwalk Second Addition '
Riverwall< T(iird Acidition
Riverwalh Fourth Addition ~
Riverwalk Fifth Addition
Riverwzlk Sixtli Additioii
Riverwalk Seveiith Addition
;
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 2
Riverwalk Eighth Addition
Riverwalk Ninth Addition
Riverwalk Tenth Addition
2. That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally
consistent with original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has taken
substantial steps toward finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include o»e, but is not
limited to, the following:
RESPONSC: Tlie proposed preliminary plat reniains consistent witli tlle originll preliminary plat that
was approved. Riverwalk First through Riverwalk Tenth Additions are constructed an(i
comprise approximately 347 of the original 365 lots approved.
2. a) surveying the lots within the development; b) arranging for public services to the site; c)
obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of tlie preliminary subdivision, short
subdivision, or binding site plan; d) the completion of stuclies or other requirements Nvhich were
part of prelimiiinry subdivision, short subdivision, or bindins site p(an approval;
RESPONSE: The completion of 10 of the 13 phases/divisions of the original preliminary p(at have
provided aIl of the infrastructure necessary to complete the development.
3. That at the time preliminlry approval was granted, develapment of the proposal wCas conditioned
upon the exteiision of ptiblic services which are iiot yet available. This provision shal) not apply
to public utiliry extensions which the project sponsor would nori»aIly fiind.
RESPONSE: NA
4. That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the plat witliin the
five (5) year time period.
RESPONSE: The applicant identifies no administrative delays having delayed the finalization of the plat.
6. The Comprehensive Plan designates the area of the prelimiiiary plat as Urban. The
Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since the original preliminary plat flpproval.
7. NeNv conditions imposed through the review of this request for an extension of time begiii on
page #9. No additiona( conditions have been recoinmeildecl by the Spokane Regiontal I-lealth
District, the Spokane County Division of Utilities, or the Spokane County Division of [3uildiiig.
8. This is the tetith (lOth) request for a time extension. Tlie total Iile oFthe preliminary plat has been
approximately nineteen (19) years. . 9. Tlle applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying witli Sectioii 12.100.118,
of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional exteiision of time.
DEi CISION
}3ASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date
for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, an_e ~ '~an,.~fr~iquest for applicatioii PF-
1414-81, RivErwalk, is hereby APPROVCD for three (3esnins.ui,~i43lCL,(,v-l
ORIGIANAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
.
Tliose previous conditions of approval snecified in the Spokane County Planning Division's Finciiilss of
Fact, Conclusion and Order dated June 16, 1995, are recited here 1s follows: (moclifrcalions to 1Jre
origitlal co»ditions are ttalicizec)
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING DIVISION
1. All conditioiis imposed by the F(earing Cxaminer Comi»iltee ancl all time extension coiiditio»s, as
.►mended or updatecl, shnll be binding oii the "Applicant." The lerm "applicant" shall iiiclude the owner
or owners"of the property, heirs, assibns and successors. ,
v
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 3
Aciditional Extensions of Time shall not be granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III,
Sectioil G, of the Subdivision Ordinance is deilionstrated by the applicant; otherwise the preliminary
subdivision ancl the preliminary planned unit development approval will become null and void.
4. (Amend 8/5/93 Plannins Condition #3. and #4.)
The "Revised Preliminary I'Iat and Preliminary Site Development P(an (PUD) oF "RIVCRWALK"
stamped "Received May 19, 1995," has been administratively approved shall be the official
preliminary pIat of record and shall be the Preliminary Planned Unit Development. This May 19, 1995
revised plan includes 9.11 acres for a proposed commercial lot and 107.3 acres for a proposed planned
unit development (PUD), being a totai of 116.41 acres (see said plan map). Tlie PUD proposes 365
single family lots. At the time of each Final PUD site development plan and Final Plat is submitted for
each phase they shall coiiiply with all development standards for the approved zone classificatioiis,
including the f'lanned Unit Development Overlay Zone, all as amended. (see 9. Uelow) Note, at this
poiiit in time, no part of the preliminary plat/PUD have been finalized since the original 1982 approval.
5. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #34.)
The above May 19, 1995 revised plan allows development phcises. These phases 1111y be
administratively amended if the various agencies find that each proposed phase will provide proper
traffic circulation, provide adequate emerbency veliicle access, meet necessary ulilities ciesibn and/or
utility circulation requirements, and provide for fihe public health and safety. •
6. (Amend 8/5/93 Plannins Condition #3.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Development ['lan (PUD) of RIVCRWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," now replaces: (1) the
"Preliminary Plat of •Record" map dated November 12,1981, as approved by the Spokane County
Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 2, 1982,
which consisted of 365 r»anufactured home lots and 1 commercia) parcel and (2) the "Revised
Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated March 15, 1983, as approved by the Spokane County Helring
Examiner Committee in the findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, which
was a redesign of the 50.2 acre South portion (S It2) with 178 lots, excluding the commercial parcel.
This S I/2 also being the Final PUD Site Development Plan approved by the Hearing Examiner
Committee in the Findings of ract, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, is now NULL and
VOID and is replaced witli tlie above May 19, 1995, preliminary plat/PUD. Note, since tlie final plat
for Pliase 1 was submitted before tlle decision to approve tlie May 19, 1995, Revised Plan, Pliase 1 may
be finalized under tlle provisions of the April 14, 1983, Final PUD, S 1/2.
7. (Ainend 8/5/93 Planning Condition 43.) A"rin11 PUD Site Development Plan" must be submitted and
approved for at least the area of each proposed final plat prior to recording any rinal Plat, other than
['hase 1. Tliis includes the S 1/2 of RIVERWAi..K (previously Riverway Villa). Each "Final 1'UD"
must substantially conform to the above May 19, 1995, revised preliminacy plat/I'UD and comply witli
the applicable development standards existing at the time of submittal.
8. (Ameiid 8/5/93 Planiling Condition #4. and 6.)
The approved zone change, ZE-92-8 l, shall be amended pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT.
The project area approved for the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone witli tlie old
PUD Overlay Zone shall be substittrted with the preseclt Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone and the
pc•esent PUD Overlay Zone. The project aren approved fur old Commeccia) (C) Zane shall be
substituted Nvith the present Community Business (B-2) Zone. The existing UR-3.5 Zone shall be
recllssified as each phase of the development is recorded as a Final Plat with the Couilty Auditor. The
reclassiticatioii shall be consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of
- record, as amended by tlle PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT.
9. (Amend 8/5/93 P1lnning Condition #7 and # 11.)
The final plat(s) shall be designed substantially in conforiliance with the above "Revised Preliminary
P11t of Record date stamped May 19, 1995." No increase of density or number of lots sliall occur
without a change of condition application submittal and approval. Each Fi»al Plat shall comply with
the current development standards of the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone and the Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, as each may be amended. The nroposed commercial parcel shall
n l with tile t develo ment standards of the Communit Business B-2) Zone, as amended.
;
,
10. 'i'he Plaiining Director/desibnee shall review any proposed final plat and final f'Ianned Unit
Development Plan to ensure complilnce with these Findings and Conditions of Approval.
1 1. (/lmend 8/5/93 I'lanniiig Con(lition #5.)
~ c✓ )
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 4
T'rior to recording a final plat which includes the commercial parcel, Spokane County shall:
a. insure that the commercial site is in compliance with the development standarcls of the Spokane
County Zoning Code, as amended,
b. insure that the commercia) site is in compliance with the development standards of the Spokane
County Road Standards, as amended, and
c. insure that commercial uses do not exceed those of "neighborliood" and "local serving" type retail or
service(s).
12. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #S.) . ,
Prior to issuing any building permits on the commercial parcel, a specific site development plan (all or
part) sliall be submitted to Spokane County. The specific site development plan will be circulated for
comments from appropriate agencies to determine compliance with current regulations and for
substantial compliance with the approved May 19,1995, revised Plan and the conditioiis of approval.
13. A final plat name/number shall be proposed before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be
approved by the Planning Director/desisnee.
14. Prior to filing of tlie final plat, tlie appropriate street adci►•ess(es) sliall be indicated. 15. Appropriate road name(s) sliall be i,idicated.
16. Tlie final plat map sliall indicate by a clear, das{ied line the required yard setbacks from aII private,
"Trct X" or piiblic roads. The dedication sliall contain tlie following statement:
~,e yard and rear ynrd setbacks sliall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless
ese setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be
aried from if proper zoning approvals are obtained."
17. ITlie fina) plat sliall indicate yard setback arc lengtlis on cul-de-sac lots whicll meet or exceed the
minimum frontage of the underlying zone or the final plat.
18. Appropriate utility easements sliall be indicated on copies of tlie proposed final plat. Written approval
of utility easements by appropriate utility companies sliall be received witli the submittal of tlie final
plat.
19. Four (4) current certificates of title sliall be fiirnished to Spokane Couiity Planning prior to filing the
final plat.
,
20. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor sliall submit one or more
maps outlined in red of tlie area beins finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map
sca le.
21. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE
specifying a fiiture Iaiid acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. '1'he reservecl t'uturc
acquisition area Title Notice may be released, in fii(1 or in part, only by. Spokane County Plaiiiiing. The
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame fls the recording of the Final Plat and sliall
provide tlie following, if applicable:
a. At least 10 feet along Mission Avenue and 5 feet along Barker Road sliall be clesignated as reserved
future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in addition to tlie existing and/or newly
dedicated right-of-way along Mission Avenue and E3arker Road. NOTC: Tlle County Engineer Iias
required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet of dedication alonb I3arker Road.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code sliall be measured
from tlie reserved future acquisition area. •
c. No required landscapiiig, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within
the fiiture acquisition area for road right-or-way and utilities. If aiiy of the above iinprovements are
i„acic wirhii, rhis area, they sliall be reloclted at the applicant's expense when roaclwly improvements
are made.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 5
d. The firture acquisition area, until acquired, sliall be private property and may be used as allowed in
the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield,
signs or others) sliall be considered interim uses.
e. The property owner sliall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time
Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said fiiture acquisition area.
22. Spokane County Planning sliall prepare and record witli the Spokane County Auditor a TITLE
NOTI CE noting tllat tlle property in question is subject to a variety of specia) conditions imposed as a
result of approval of a land use action. Tliis TITLE NOTICE sliall serve as public notice of the
conditions of approval affecting the property in question. Tlle notice should be recorded witliin the
same time frame as the recording of the final Plat and sliall only be released, in full or in part, by
Spokane County Planning. The Title Notice sliall generally provide as follows:
Tlie parcel of property legally described as [ ] is tlle subject of a land use lction by a
Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in
Spokane County Planning.
23. The plat dedication sliall contain the following statement for those lots located on a cul-de-sac/stub
road: Lot(s) . Block(s) are located on a temporary cul-de-sac/stub
road. This cul-de-sac/stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect
to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate.
24. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection sliall be approved by tlie
water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department aild County
Health District. The asencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the
plail is in conformance with tlieir respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification
sliall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by tlie plat spoiisor.
25. Tlle water purveyor sliall certify tliat appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of
improvements liave been made witli the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in
accordance with tlie approved Water ('Ian. The time schedule sliall provide for completion of the water
system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits
within the final plat. The arranbements or agreements sliall include a provision holding Spokflne
County ai_the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to
tl~e failUre of the sLibdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
~
26. T, ' fnal plat dedication sliall contain the following statemeiit: The public water system, pursuant to
Iie~Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fre protection district, County
a
'uilding & Safety Departinent and water purveyor, sliall be installed within this subdivision; 1nd the
~applicant sliall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior
to sale of each lot aild prior to issuaiice of a building permit for each lot.
27. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the fiiial plat until certified by a Washington state-
licensed engineer that "the water systeill has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the
f1111I }7I1t, " includins a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is
preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built" water
system.
28 . The Water Plan and the above conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the
Plannins Director/designee upon receipt of letters from tlle appropriate water pttrveyor and fire
protection district stating that simple connections to fln existins, approved wclter system will provide
lciequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare.
29. A survey is required prior to tlie filing of a final plat.
30. Approval is required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific lightiiig and signing plaii for the
ciescribed property prior to the relezse of any buildins permits.
3 I. Direct liglit from any exterior area lighting fixture sliall not extend over the property boundary.
32. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to tlle Planning
Director/desisnee sliall be submitted witli a performance boild for tlie project prior to release of
i
0 ~.J
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 6
building permits. Landscapins shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points
is not obscured or impaired.
33. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #29.)
The Final PUD site development pla►i sliall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well
as setbacks from roadways and individual lot lines.
34. A copy of the horneowners/property owners' association articles of incorporation ancl/or by-laws and/or
covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and
facilities, sliall be submitted for review and approval to Spokane County Planninb prior to finalizing.
35. The owner/applicant sliall coordinate witli tlie local Fire District and tlle Fire Marsliall to
insure that adequate access is provided for emerbency services, prior to submitting each
Final Plat phase.
36. Each final plat dedication shall make reference to the Home Owners Associatioii agreements as a
notice to potential lot purchaser of the responsibilities of lot ownership within the subdivisioii.
37. Th n s ace shown on the May 19, 1995, Revised Prelimiiiary Plat that are withi»
tli re required to comply with the Spokane County Shoreline Program
regulation. The Final Plat shall show the 200 foot shoreliiie bo«iidary. E1c11 lot wliicli illcliides tlie 200
foot boundary must have a buildable site that meets all required setbacks (both zoninb aiid shoreliiies)
before it is recorded as a Fina) Plat. Notes (at least 2) shall be placed on the Final Plan drawiii6 iiear the
affected lots and common open space which state:
"The property witli the 200 foot Shoreline boundary has lega) limitations on the use of this land
pursuant vegetation and building of structures, including fences."
38. If a Final Plat is'recorded with any lot partially within the 200 foot boundary of the Shoreline, a TITLE
NOTICE sliall be recorded by Spokane County Planning immediately after recording the Final Plat
with the County Auditor. The TITLE NOTICE shall include a staternent similar to:
"Any;`lot's property or common open space property within the 200 foot shoreline boundary have
limitations on building structures (including fences) and changing the natural vegetation pursuant the
Spokane County Shoreline Program Regulations."
.
39. After the commercial parcel is granted B-2 Zoning with the recording of a Final Plat, the
applicant/owner shoulcl make application for a Binding Site P11n to allow for timely division and sale
of portions of the commercial site after a Final I3inding Site Plan is recorded. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND RQAAS Prior To Issuance of a Building Permit Or Use Of The Propertv As Proposed:
1. All previously imposed conditions are still anplicable. '
2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRINCIPLE Arterial and Mission Avenue
as a MiNOR Arterial. The existinb riglit-of way widths are not consisteiit witli those spcciliecl in llic
I'lan. In order to iniplemeiit the Arteria) Road Plan, in additioil to the required right-of-xvay dedicatioii,
a strip of property 5 feet in width along Barker Road and 10 feet in width along Mission Avenue sliall
be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Snokane County at the time when ac-terial
improvements are made to Barker Road and Missiori Avenue.
3. As per the original conditions of approval:
' ' nd reviewed by Spokane County
prior to pra ina ization. fiis W11 tate of Washington Department of
Transportation. A traffic analysis for each pliase will serve as a basis for the evaluation of the need for
traffic contro) devices at Barker Road and Mission Ave»ue. Should the analysis determine a need for
intersection upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate share for• the required
improvements.
4. Prior to any pIat checkins of Riverway Villa for phased (inalization of the plat thc aforementioned
analysis sliall be completed.
. ~ ~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 7
5. Intersection and road improvements shall be constructed and phased as follows predicated on an
agreement reached on or about August 4, 1994, between North [daho Engineering and the Spokane
County Engineer.
Barlcer Road: Phase I: Construct Barker/Iiidiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5-lane section per
tlie County's Special section for.Barker Road). Provide acceleration/deceleration lanes (sized per
WSDOT Design manual), as well as inbourid and outbound tapers.
i'hase li: Construct IIarker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless built
out sooner as part of Phase VI.
Phase VI: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, unless
built out sooner as part of Phase 11.
Mission Avenue: Phase I: Construct Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Construct north
side of Mission Avenue (per the Couiity's Speciai Section for Mission Avenue) from Clark rork
(Harmony Lane) to IIarker. Provide iiibound taper to Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) iiitersectioil.
Phase ifl: Coiistruct Mission/['otomac i111CI MlSSIOIlIYUkOII intersections. Construct iiorth side of
Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Avenue
froiitage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Pravide inbound
taper to the widened Mission/Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary.
6. Conditioils of Approval require that I3arker Road and Mission Avenue improvements adjaceiit to Phase
V1 are to be completed prior to issuance of a builciing permit for any projects on tllat parcel.
7. The aforementioned phasing is a minimum development program. Ctianges to this coiistruction
schedule may be implemented pending completion of the Traffic Iinpact Analysis for each phase of the
development.
8. Engineers Condition #21 of April 2, 1982 Hearing Exarniner Committee Findings and Order required
that a strin of property 15 feet in width along Barker Road be dedicated from Mission Avenue to the
Spokane River. Since a portion of tliis strip is not controlled by tlie applicant this requirement for
dedication is not applicable. Riglit-of-way along E3arker Road witliin the original approved plat sliall be
dedicated 1t the time of final plat approval or vesting of any commercial rezone. lmprovements to
[3arker Road from the Spokane River bridge on Barker to Mission Ave. shall still be required with the
existing right-of-way per a phasing plan to be agreed to by the developer and approved by the County
Engi»eer.
9. Regarding the May 19, 1995, redesign I'lan the following condition shall apply:
(I) Temporary cul-de-sacs shall be constructed at the terminus of Indiana Avenue, Tippi Canoe Lane
cannot be used as a public rozd turn-around and all other streets that provide access to more than one
lot shall also provide an acceptable turn-around.
(2) liliprovements to proposed roadways shall be as outlined in tlie approved conclicioiis af approval or
as amended by the overall traffic analysis currently being completed.
SPOI{ANE COUNTY DIVISION OT UTILITIES
1. Any water/;ervice for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
2. The dedication sliall state: Tlie Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to autliorize tlie County to
. place their iiame(s) on a petition for the formltion of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW
365.94 WI11CI1 tlle petition includes the Owner(s) property and furtlter not to object by signing of a
protest petition against the formation'of a ULiD by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which
inCludes the Owner(s) property. Provided, this condition sliall , not prohibit tlie Owner(s) or
Seiccessor(s) from objection to any assessmeiit(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for
tconjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution tmder RCW 36.94.
3. Applicant wil) mal:e connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required.
4. Plans and specifications for tlie public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by tlle Utilities
Department. Spokane Cotinty plan subnlittal requirements apply.
5. Tlie dedication sliall state:
0
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 8
"Thewo~ner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the CountY to Place their
,
namon a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which
er'~tion includes tlie owner(s)' ProPertY; and fiirtlier not to obJect bY the signing of a protest petition
P
inst the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chlpter 36.94 Nvhich includes
owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition sliall not prollibit tlle owner(s) or siiccessor(s) from
bjecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a restilt of improvements called for in conjunction
ith the formation of a ULID by eitlier petition or resolution metliod under RCW Cliapter 36.94.
6. Any water service for this project sliall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
Plan for Spoklne County, as amended.
7. Applicant sliall make connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans
and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department.
. SPOKANE COUTY IIEALTH DISTRICT
1. A st ; ement sliall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system Nvil) be made
ava~able for the plat and individual service will be provided to eacli lot prior to sale. Use ot' iiiclivicltial '
i~-site sewage disposal systems sliall not be autllorized. "
2. The final plat sliall be designed as indicated on the prelii»inary p11t of recorci and/or any attached
sheets as noted.
3. Appropriate utility easements sliall be indicated oii copies of the preliminary plat of record for
distribution by Spokane County Planning to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the
Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be
received prior to the siibmittal of tlie final plat.
4. Sewase disposa) method sliall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service sliall be coordinated tlirougli the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
6. Water service sliall be by an existing public water supply when anproved by the Regioiial Engineer
(Snokane), State Department of I4ealth.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor sliall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spoklne County
Health District that an adequlte and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat.
8. Prior to filing the fl nal plat, the sponsor sliall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded
service area of the water system proposed to serve tlie plat.
9. A plan for water faci(ities ldequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use 1nd fire protection use
sliall be approved by tlie water purveyor. Said water plan must Iiave beeii approved by tlle fl re
protection district and the appropriate liealtli authorities. Tlie healtli autliorities, water supplier
(purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filittg of the final plat, oii tlie face of
said water plan thzt the plaii is in conformance with their requirements aiid will adequately satisfy their
respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for
reproductioii.
10. Tlie purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan tliat appropriate
contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in
accordance witli the approved plan znd time scliedule. Tlie time scliedule will provicie, in any case, for
completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application
for building perrnits within the plat. The contractua) arrangements will include a provisioii holding
Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from
claignrs by any lot/tract purchaser refiised a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to
salisfactorily complete tlie approved water system.
11. ~Iie diedicatory language oil the plat sliall state: "Use of private wells and water sYstems is prohibited."
12. Th~ flnal plat dedication sliall contain the following statement: The public water system, pursuant to
tli water plan approved by county and state llealth authorities, tlle local fre protection district, County
B ilding and Safety Department, and water purveyor, sliall be installed wifihin this subdivision and the
~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 9
applicant shall provide for indiviclual domestic water service as well as fire protection to eacli lot/ti•act
prior to sale of eacli lodtract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract.
Sl'OI{ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILnINGS 1. Tlie applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be
inforrned of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act.
Design/development concerns include: ADDRESSING, FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIRE
t-iYDRANT/FLOW; A['PROVCD VVATER SYSTEMS; I3UILDING . ACCESSII3ILITY;
CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONEXiTING; EXTERIOR WALL
PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. (Note: Tlie Division of Buildiligs reserves
tlie ribht to conFrm the lctual address at the time of building permit.)
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOYtTATION
PRIOR TO~APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT:
1. ~ jraffic analysis sliall be prepared for tile Barker Road interchange and sliall contain the followiiig
(le,pents:
Site Map (illustrating tlie complete circulation system) . Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distribution)
c. Existing Transportation Coilditions
1. Existing average daily h•affic
2. Existiiig AM and PM peak liour leve( of service
. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements
d. I'rojecteJTransportation Conditions with this Development
1 P,•ojected Average Daily Traffic
. Projected AM and PM peak liour level of service
. Projected AM and PM peak hour turning movements
e. ecommended mitigating measures
i 1. Mitigating measures sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D"
2.oIf the existing Level of Service lD cannot be maintained a justification should be included
NOTE: The ITE (Institute of Transportation Cngineers) Trip Generation Manual (Sth Edition) shall be
used as a basis to compute trip geiieration rates of the proposed developments.
D2. That the applicant agree to funci and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outlineci in the
aUove traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane
County Enbineers prior to the issuance of any building permits for this property.
3. Due to the trip generation potential, any further development other than what is proposed will require
fiirther review by WSDOT to assure additional trips are safely lccommodated.
NEW CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
Wlierever the "New Conditions of Approval" replicate or conflict witli the prior existiilg
conditions of approvAl recited above, tlie "New Conditions of Approval" shall be controlling
and shnll amend and/or replace the terms and intent of the original conditions.
Sl'OKANT COUNTY DIVISION OF PY..ANNING
l. The final plat sliall be designed substantially in conformance with tlie preliminary plat of record.
No iiicrease of density or iiumber of lots, or substantial modifications to tlie preliminary plat sliall
occur without a change of condition application submittal aiid approval. Phased approval of the
fin11 plat is allowed but must be approved by the Division of Planning and other agencies who
Slbll thC f1111I pI1t.
2. ('rior to recording of any final plat, the sponsor shall provide written approval of the final plzt
design from the Northwestern Pipeline Corporation.
~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 10
.
3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance acceptable to the
Director of the Division of Planning/designee sliall be submitted with a performance bond or
other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any buildiiig permits. Landscaping sliall
be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired.
4.
he ap ' on a east thirty (30) days prior to
the above expiration date but no later than May 31, 2003. Application(s) for extension of time
sliall be processed under the provisions of Chapter 12.100.118 (Extension of Time) of tlle
Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, as amended. 1f the applicant complies with the criteria
of Chapter 12.100.1 18, the preliminary approval and conditions will be changed to reflect the
' adopted policy and development regulations at the time of the extension application.
5. Subsequent extensions of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliaiice
with Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance as amended. Otherwise
the preliminary plat will become null and void.
6. Prior to filing all or a portion of the final plat the applicant's surveyor sh111 submit one or i»ore
maps outlined in red of the area beiiig fiilalized aiid those portionslphases that have received tinal
plat approval. Tlie scale shall match tlie appropriate assessor's map scale.
7. The Spokane County Critical Acea maps indicates the preliminary p{at is located within a seo-
hazardous area. The Spokane County Soil Survey identifies Uhlig Varia»t Silt Loam soils on sire
whicli are identified by the Spokane County Critical Areas Ordinance as havins the potential for
severe erosion. Prior to any final plat review or approval, tlie applicant sliall subrnit a preliminary
geo-hazard evaluation for review and possible approval by the Divisioils of Planning, Engineering
and Utilities. It may be foucld, upon review of the prelimitiary geo-hazard evaluation, that ainore
in depth study is required to assure the potential for erosion is addressed aiid m itigated
appropriately.
8. The dedication for the final plat sliall state, "The land encompassed within the boundaries of the
final plat contain geo-hazardous areas, specifically Uhlig variant si{t loam. soils. This soil type is
identified as having t{le potential for severe erosion. Those t111tlgat111g measures ideiitified iii
[name of the author of the approved preliminary geo-hazard evaluation and date of said renort]
sliall be met prior to the issuance of any building permit. Land use activity within the geo-
hazardous areas sliall be as regulated by the Spoklne County critical areas ordinance, as
amended".
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OT ENGINCERING
Pr•ior to release of 1 builcling pcrmit or usc of propcrty as pronosed:
1. fessional En ineer ticensed to sliall submi`
inal roa
also comply wiT11 a app ica e s ate an e era aws ia n ay be applicable to this project. Final
road and drainage plans, rellted calculations and a drainage report sliall receive the County
Engineer's acceptailce prior to release of a construction or building permit or approva) of lhe final
plat. Following plan acceptance by the Spokane County Engineer, drainage language will be
drafted by Spokane County atld provided to tlle Sponsor's Engineer or Stirveyor for it}clusion
with the final plat document.
2. 1f the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access 1nd/or drainage
- treatment and disposal, the prior phase sliall be completed and certified 'prior to the subinittal of
plaiis for the depende»t phase of the develapmeilt. One foot no access strips oil public roads will
not be relelsed until the subject phase is coi»pleted, certified and accepted by Spokane County
for maintenance. No access through a non certifiecl and non-accepfied phase of the development
may be allowed and no plans wi11 be accepted by Spolcane County for construction uiiless the
prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Ensineer.
3. As per Section 9.14,080 of tlle Spokane County Code, no person shall co»struct a road or otlier
facilities withi►i lhe existing proposed, or fiiture pubiic right-of-way, or the private road e;asement
in connection with the actions enumerated in Section 9.14.020 without out first having received a
permit as specified in Section 9.14.070(1) for such facilities from the County Engineer. Said
permit will not be granted until tlle plans for the developt»ent have beeii accepted by the County
Engineer. If this provisioii is violated, the County Engineer may decide to not accept a bancl for
~
s • -
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 11
tlie improveinents ancJ may require the project sponsor to build and certify the facilities prior to f nal plat.
4. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin that has
beeii identified by the Spokane County Engiiieer's and Utilities offices as having stormwater
runoff problems. Since_this-proposed subdivision or developiilent proposal is affected by or is a
contributor to stormwater flows, property owners -should participate in the planning and
implei fentation of a future basinwide stormwater management system. The following statement
shal,l~be placed in the nlat dedication:
"The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County-approved stormw~ er`
~management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fxed throush public 11 ~mrings
~for service or benefit obtained by tl~e planning, design, constructing, maintaining orooper,ation of
~y , ater control facilities."
5. The ' oe~i~~Coz~ extension of time and will require that the
proposed plat shall be ininroved to tlie standards set forth in Spokane County Bonrd of
Commissioners Resolution No. 99-0265, as ainended, wliicli establislies regulations for roads,
approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
6. All previous imposed Cou»ty Eiigineering Conditions of Approval are still applicable.
S1'OKANE COUNTY UTILITE, S nEPARTMENT
l. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin that lias
beeii identified by the Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as having stormNvater
runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a
contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and
implementation of a future basinwide stormwater management system:-7 Ilowing statement
lei:
shall be
1e p at dedication:
"The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County-approved stormwater
management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fxed through public hearings
for service or benefit obtair~ed by the planning, design, coiistructing, maintaining or operation of
stormwater control facilities."
NOTT: No otlicr ncw conclitions of approval were rcryuested by the reviewing agencies listecl below.
Under state law aiid county ordinlnce, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane County
Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To file such an appeal,
you niust sub,nit a letter aloiib with the arpropriate procc;ssinb fee payablc to the Spokanc Counly
Division of Planning, within 14 (fourteen) calendar days from the date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, plezse call the Spokane County Division of Plaiining at 477-7200.
DATED THIS 20"' DAY OT JUNE, 2000
~
Jailies Richardson, Associate Planner
C: Spokane County Division of Ciigineerinb and Roads, Scott Cilgelhard
Spokane County Division of Engineering, Developer Services, Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities, Water Resources, Jim Red
Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Iirendl Sims
Spokane Regional Jiealth District, Steve Iiolderby
Spokane County Division of l3uildinb and Code Cnforcement, Jeff f orry
Files (6 copies)
Stanton-Spokane L.P., 16720 N. C. I 16'h Sh•eet, Redmoncl, WA 98052
Riverwalk 50 L. L. C., 16720 N. E. 1 l6'h Street, Redmoncl, WA 98052
Shor•ewood I-(omes, 3901 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815
Wel Co. GrouP, c/o 1-1&F1 Property, 827- ] O8'h Ave., NE, Bellevue, WA 98004
Pacific Properties, 14410 I3el Recl Road, Bellevue, WA 98007
K.C. Constructioti, I' O l3ox 111455, 1-Iayden Lake, ID 83835
CLC, 707 West 7th, Suite 200, Spokaile, WA 99204
■ ~
r ~ •
'
~ , • .
(z) 1< 0
. , , ' , 4~ ' w,,.,• ( , PP,4 • , ~ .1{?n#
UlV15lQN ON k:NCINII13IifNG AN(} SIOAt35 J1 UIVIStUN Oll TJ•iL PUIfL1C 1. -0111'AIr7'M~;N'1' a ~
Wilti.tiin A. Jaltiitis, i',G,, Coutis ~iti liiq«~
Y !j CC: l.isi !:iitials
~
~ AGRLI+, MLN'' T0 PAX FEES
LNGiNLEXt'S AGIUMMI.N'l' NUMBL1~ ~~/Z/
't'liis -,tbruLoicttc I)t;lwecn Spok.uie County auic1 C&L Developments, L-.L.C. , . .
whuse hlte rest in ilze prajecc is. 4wner . , . , ~ . rn. v , nc .tc; cn7);; - •
is eluci-etJ into tilis 19 th duy of June , 2001 ."i"lils' agt•enmetzr is applicable to elie proJecc
k»uwji as; Riverwalk 11 th , .
'1'hI1t the IIlCIIVIdUal5 ►1ud p,irties »-anyeci hcrc;ili as 1t3YS11gnn 1mC1eSt.lii Cll£ 'abU11C (JCScI'iVt'.CI praperty or pcojCct-Rbcec:
Lo Elie l'ollowing; ~ .
l, lZeimbursc~ 5pokiuie Couuey ivr pr«jcct rc;VietiY atlcl iilSpeCttotl 1*6CS itS SpCC1fiCd 11l CI111pIey 9.14 ot
the Spok-n«e Cotiiity Cade, 'l'he fces wilf be Wisecl usi -acttiial sctil a ry, costs',iileii'ri•ed by%SjaokKtEie
Couiity fur project rcvicws tiiid ! or iiispectious plus a tc:h perceat aiiniiaistra[ivc: chargc,--a11c1 tivill .
Ue billecl iiianchly as 2iccrutd. }1i1y Uilji»g <<iltiUUlzls duc, includi,ig Eiuy, expctises incurrc;d in
culleciiu» o3' an uvcrclue accuun~, must Uc paid prior co rIIC Cuuilty's .ICcepta11c:C or the prvjecl. 1'ur
riliilg, V a prajecc is approvecl aiidlor filed Nvitri a Ua1ancc; still ow}clg, llte tinpaid bWR»ace .sliall bc: .
paic] witlii<< 30 cltiys of tlie fiivoice d:llc:. ~
2, '1"lse undes•sigsied ftigrees th<<t these Nes fii'c due and payaUie upoii receipt ot' tEie bilfliib as spcci!`ioct
abave. ~ . . .
3. Any ttlV0ice5 la0t paid wlchitZ 30 days of the ilivoice tlate will be considored deiincluent. ~Ifr atsy, .
ou[stfandinb balaiice on the accoui3t i'ar iJiis project is iiot paid wichin 30 clays of the invoice-t~pte,. no lurtliet• reviews af tiie projecc documeuts will be conducted until tiie- eai(jre account balan:ce is .
paid, Ai1y balunc:e on the iiccount f'or this pcojeo 1101 p<<icl witl3il3 65 days of tho invoice, ,dtile iiiay.
result ~cz lebai actian or the init~ation ot' ocl~er colleetioiz procedures,' Inclutfijig-, tefer*., tv a
collectton abency, The Spaiisor will be 1iablG far arty ond al1 expenses iocurred:by the Codmy fo~
the collcctiUii of avercSue nCCC}Ulll'S, 4, '1'lie lilwllhly WIl111g S1lUt1ld bE: SCi)t lU the actentiou ol'; . .
. . .
NAML: Linda Condron ADDReSS; 7205 W. Kendick Rd C1'l'1', S"i'A'l'L: Nine Mile Falls, wA 99426 LlI? CQDL: 9'9026 , . ' . . 111-[ONE. 509/467-8096 Pt-10NE # 2; 509/325-4865 1 509/467-8089 ~ ~AX ll: '
L_M,~j~ lindacondron@hotmail.com
I w3cferswnd ihuc fai.ure to pay dzese ['ee-s iiZay ce:sult in clelfty Il1 C0i1'1iiI41']4i1 Ol• a~pz-oval of tlic projecc or ollzer
possible sanccioils.
❑ If ttiis fee Agreetnent is cuizai)letecJ by so»zeozie ochci' (J)n11 l'ElC 5p01l50r (i,e,, tlie prqjecC OW1lLi, 0 r it
principal in elie (irni spoiisoring e11e projeec}, suc1i as tlae Etlginc:er tlesigiting the projecc, thcit
writiest authorizw-ion froiis the Spo:lsor 5pec1Xlenlly uuihoriz1iig tlx'c Age:it tu exccute, (Ixis Fcc; .
. AgrcertlLilt is littacliec] to cl}is Tee A6i•eciiieiit. . ,
Sl G NA" 1 U RL i3~. &aq
~
v
Graig G. Condron tPRIN•r NAML7
1tL'1'URN YI?LLUW dot'y'ro Sl''oa,ANU Ct)UN'1'1' I,NGINIs'ERS
kll\a~rcefr~~,tlac 212000
' .
1020 V4' lircractw:iy M-t~ Spolc.me 11'A')9Z({)-{t170 (509) 477-3000 , F11~1; (501) 477-2243 '1'D I): (509) 324-3,160
_ ,
~ f
SPOKANE COUN"I"Y Lx r ISION OF BUILDING AND %.vDE ENFORCEMENTN
1026 WF.ST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050
(509) 477-3675 /
\
C STTE INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMAT'ION )
Site Address: 0 N ADDRESS UNKNOWN AVE Project Number: 01004893 Inv: l Issue Date:
SPOKANE, WA 00(}00 Permit Usel~~~iaf~j,~"1' ~
Parcel Number: 55083.9043
Subdivision: UTIKNOWN Applicant: MISSION MEAUOWS LLC
Black: Lot: 15918 E CAMERON CT
Zoning: UNK Unknown SPOKANE, WA 99037 Phone: (509) 458-4850
(hvncr: MISSION MEADOWS LLC Contact: Mark Duffner, CLC Assoc.
707 W 7th, Suite 200
Address: 15918 E CAMERON CT
SPOKANE, WA 99037 Spokane, WA 99204 Phane: (509) 458-6840
Setbacks - Front: Left: Right: Rear:
Inspector: NONE
Water Dist: iJNKNOWN
Group Name: PU1414-81 ~
Project Name:
~ p'ERMIT(S) ~
I
LonP Pla1 Contractor: License
FINAL 20 $1,029.00 ) $104.00 ~
ermit Fee: $1,129.00
~ PAYMENT SLTMMARY Paoe 1 of 1 NOTES )
PAYMENT Processed By: WRIGHT, RAE
Printed By: WENDEL, GLORIA
Tran Date Recei t~# Pavment Amt
6/21 /O 1 4600 $1,129.00
Total Fees AmoantPaid AmoantOwing
$1,129.00 $1,129.00 $0.00
y '
( .w •
a
. Spvkane County
Public Works Department
Divison of Buildrng & C'ode Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Number: 4600 Customer Number
Projects
Fu11
Proiect lYbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt Owirtg PAID Pmt
01004893 1 $1,129.00 $1,129.00 $1,129.00 $1,129.00 nt,
Total: $1,129.00 $1,129.00 $1,129.00 $1,129.00
Miscellaneous Items . •
. Total PAID: $1,129.00
.
Tender
Type Check Acct - Balance CC Nbr Ep Date TENDERED
Check1 0983 1,029.00
Check2 0984 100.00
Total TENDERED: 1,129.00
Over / (Short) $0.00
Cl:ange $0.00
Notes:
Tron Datt / Ttme: 6121 /01 3:59:50 PM
By: GWendel
Logon User: gwendel
Station: GWENDEL
Override By:
Printed: 61211013: S9: SI PM Page 1 oj 1
a
. ~ ~SE .
^ . . ~
. . rO~vG A,~,Q j,pd~A,~„jolv
~
- ~,~,,f I -
' y ~'Y~ ~ ~ ~ i. ~ ~ V~~O• - `
. f ~ r ~ ~ x ~r~ ~ , ' K~ ' ~I F . f S p a~ r
~ .+t~ , • P~~'~
' . . r ~,~1~ NumbeT ~ c .N~mber.
t~J• ~ . ' • ' . * . . - a„ "J:~^,.
:
. . . f 5'~tt~~p' • ti ' '
I~~►m~~ ~ . ~ • ~ _ ~ ~~ity
'ij~ ~qv►aLs~ a
~ompan~' ~a _ - ~ . ioN by
P'1^~~~~t~ ' ~ M1~ f • ~E A , ~ .ty• ~
~
• , d~. # S
, .d
, ' ~ : , ~ . ,;x••:, _ ~
~,ry 'S , rq~- ' y`~•~'`` A t!
~ i ~ . ~ . ~ , ` . . ~Rl'}~ • / 1
~.~,1'A'
. 1 w:... ~ ^ ; .k, ~1 ~ • d , V
'~1~~. , 'a~.s/~ i~ ~ ~ ~s L
1;. - ~ , ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ a
• . ,
e ~ ~t
o v ~T
~
i ~ ' ~ ~ , ; ~ ~1 '
, •t,,
' ~ . .YM•~ ~ ~ ' ~J• ~ 1 , .A ~ ` 1j ~
. ~ .T j ~ t '~l. ~ -r.~ / ~ ~ . ■ y
J~
~ ~ y ; _ x~ r `"~'~-~'',~~Y~' ° . • , py T00 .
T0T X.
on
,i•ransacti
, ~ . i.'t•1 ~ i r ':~r.T~~~. ~ . R~Ceip~#~ '
• " p Y . s +~t , .
~ ' ' . - . . . . i-, •.,.'~Si . !t~' . , t't''; . >t~ . ~ . ,w t . • , - - - -
• , , I
Transmittal
~
A
~~CMU
Deveiopment seMces Deparlment
Divisian of Engineering and Roads
(509) 477-3600
Fax (509) 477-7655
•
Date: May 6, 2002 From: Cindy Caltan
To: John Saywers; Susan Murphy Project: P1414J
Company: CLC A.ssociates Subject: Bond estimate
cc: Craig and Linda Condron
Copies: Description:
1 Bond estimate
XI For Your Use For Your Records As Requested
Comments:
~
Callan, Cindy
From: Callan, Cindy
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:16 AM
To: John Saywers (E-mail)
Cc: Susan Murphy (E-mail); Hohman, John
Subject: P1414J Riverwalk 11 th Addition - drainage language
Hi John.
Attached is the drainage language for this project that needs to be placed on the face of the final plat.
rwr
P14143 Drainage
Language.doc .
Thanks,
Cindy
Cindy D. Callan, E.I.T.
Plan Review Engineer
Development Services
Division of Engineering and Roads
ccallan@spokanecounty.org
(509) 477-3600
1
Transmittal sPoMKcOUIUY
;Pulrk
Development Services Department
Division of Engineering and Roads
(509) 477-3600
Fax (509) 477-7655
Date: May 2, 2002 From: Cindy Callan
To: Susan Murphy Project: P1414J
Company: CLC Associates Subject: Copy of mylars
Copies: Description:
1 Copy of the mylars for P 1414J Riverwalk 11 Addition
For Your Use XI For Your Records As Requested
Comments:
707 W. 7TH AVE. T R A N S M I TTA L
SUITE 200
SPOKANE DENVER
103 WASHINGTON 99204
P sog ass 6840 S PO KAN E
F 509 456 6844
CLC A550CIATES SALT LAKE cIn
TO~:f DATE: ~l I If~~i
tJ2 ` PRO ~r~1/~el'~'L(J?l
~ ~ j• ~`JECT
NAME:
3 )PO}{WE COUNTY EP IG1;~E° P R O J E CT
ATTN: NUMBER: S'0~l-1-7
U
WE ARE SENDING:
X ENCLOSED UNDER SEPARATE DOCUMENTS COMPUTER DISCS
PRINTS ~ REPROOUCiBLES REPORTS OTHER
COPIES DESCRIPTION
ebr~~k 54orm *aJvy)
~ a~~ ~
1 C ~-~s
FOR YDUR USE FOR YOUR REVIEW FOR YOUR APPROVAL , SENTPERYOUR REQUEST
EXPRESS MESSENGER PICKUP U.S. MAIL R E M A R K S: vv~O, bg-7-)d, ~~~CJ~~C.J mUe
~
C O PY TO: BY:
- - -
- RIVERWALK 11 TH
QUANTITY ESTIMATE Project Name: Riverwalk 11 th Addition
Project Number: C-20-S000177
Date: 05/01 /02
Quantities Prepared by: SMM
Itern D.esc~~pt~o,n UiffMU.nit 151e ltotalm
Drainage Items
1 Not used
2 Pipe 10" PVC 11 LF
3 Drywell, type B solid cover 2 EA
4 Curb inlet Type 2 4 EA
5 Concrete inlet Type 1 2 EA
6 Drywell B metal grate Type 4 2 EA
7 Pipe 12" PVC 56 LF
8 Pond Excavation 119 CY
Roadway Items
9 Asphalt concrete - Class B 63 TN
10 Base Course 405 CY
11 Curb, Type R 1,213 LF
12 6' Sidewalk 662 LF
13 Rough Grade 694 CY
Temporary Erosion Control Items
14 Silt Fence 523 LF
15 Rock Construction Entries -2 148 SY
16 Pond Excavation 119 CY
Miscellaneous
17 Inspections 6,540
Subtotal:
Subtotal, Including 3% inflation from year 2001 to 200?
TOTAL, INCLUDING 1.1 MULTIPLIER
5/1 /2002
Bond Estimate.xls 1:19 PM
S P O K A N E a~ C O U N T Y
DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMINT
Apri125, 2002
John Saywers, P.E.
CLC Associates, Inc.
707 W. 7`hAvenue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
Subject: P1414J Riverwalk 11`h Addition Road and Drainage Submittal #2
Dear John,
Thank you for addressing our previous review comments in your April 18, 2002 submittal of the design
documents for this proj ect. The only remaining issue is in regards to the Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). Our department now requires that the CC&Rs reference the
Operation and Maintenance Manual as prepared by the engineer for each project. Please verify that the
drainage section in the CC&Rs for this project refers to the Operation and Maintenance Manual. Since
this is a minor issue, you are authorized to submit mylars. A revised copy of the CC&Rs needs to be
submitted with the mylars. If you have any questions, please contact Cindy Callan at 477-3600.
Sincerely,
John V. Hohman, P.E. -
Development Services Engineer/Manager
Cindy D. Ca lan, E.I.T.
Plan Review Engineer
cc: Craig and Linda Condron, project applicants
Susan Murphy, CLC Associates, Inc., project manager
Jason Langbehn, Spokane County Planning, project coordinator
~
1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133
r~ ~
707 W. 7TH AVE. R~ A N S M I TTA L
SUITE 200 ~
SPOKANE til V eo
Aen DENVER
WASHINGTON 99204 ~'1 ~
P 509 458 6840 S~JO`-- 2 2oo2 S PO KAN E
CLC A550CIATE5 F 509 458 6644 N91~Ec0(lNn,aNa/ SALT LAKE cIrY
N~R
T O: D AT E: 41l-! / O Z-
1
P R O J E C T 114h
U NAME:
PROJECT
ATTN: aal
NUMBER: ('1-7
WE ARE SENDING:
~ ENCLOSED UNDER SEPARATE X DOCUMENTS COMPUTER DISCS
PRINTS REPRODUCIBLES REPORTS OTHER
COPIES DESCRIPTION
DG?~ SeQSP,1'1r1Ch+$
FOR YOUR USE FOR YDUR REVIEW FOR YOUR APPROVAL ~ SENTPERYOUR REQUEST
EXPRESS MESSENGER , PICKUP U.S. MAIL
REMARKS:
~
n
C \
C O PY TO: BY: '
-e ♦
CLC A550CIATES
OFFlCIAL Pt16L1C DOCUh1EPlT
Aprii 16, 2002 SPOKA1vE COUMY ENGINEER'S OFFlCE
CLC No. c-2o-S000177 OR G NAL
PROJECT # Q%4_ 14_S
Spokane County SUBMfTZAL # a.
Development Engineering Services RETURN TO C,OUN1Y ENGlNEER
1026 W. Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
Attn: Cindy Callan, E.I.T. RECEIVED
Re: Riverwalk 11 th Addition~ 2nd Street and Storm DraiAa ~gbMpal
~ 9
SPOXAIVE C0t1n7y EyGINEER
Dear Cindy:
Enclosed please find a bond copy of the street and storm drainage submittal for your
review. The comments received in your letter dated April 2, 2002 have been addressed
as follows:
1. The operation of Pond E has been discussed between us, and my understanding
is that no alteration to the pond or outlet needs to be made.
2. Notes have been added to Detail 6, Sheet 4 for the "heavy-duty sidewalkU as
requested.
3. Detail 1, Sheet 2 specifies that the length of the curb opening is 4 feet unless
otherwise noted. The detail is based on Standard Plan B-8.
4. The note on Sheet 4 regarding soils tests has been modified to specify tests for
all the ponds.
5. Standard Plan note number 7 from Appendix B has been added to the general
notes.
6. The attachments in the Operations and Maintenance Manual have been updated
to correspond to this project. The text matches the elevations and volumes on
the plan set.
7. A reciprocal agreement is being prepared by Jerry Trunkenbolz, our client's
attorney, granting all the necessary parties access from and through Riverwalk
and Shannon Lanes to the public roadway system. The Homeowners
707 WEST 7TH AVENUE • SUITE 200 • SPOKANE • WA 99204 • P 509 45B 6640 • F 509 458 6844
DENVER • SPOKANE • SALT LAKE CITY
s 1
Spokane County Engir;t-_ 1~1'ng Development Services -Riverwalk 11th Addition 2"d Submittal
Aprill 16, 2002
Page 2
Associations for 3rd, 5t' and 9th Additions will grant reciprocal agreements with
the 11 Addition Homeowners Association. See the attached map.
8. The CC&Rs are being prepared by Mr. Trunkenbolz as well.
Please give me a call if you need anything further to complete your review. We will
prepare two sets of mylars for acceptance once we are notified that it is appropriate to
do so. Thank you.
Sincerely,
CL sociates
usan Murphy, E.I. .
Project Manager
SKM/skm
cc: file
~ ;,j~ ~.D
~J u
_ " ~ ►
. ~ ,
,
r ►
r--- 1 1
►
4
. ~'qCT ° ~1 i
'f~`
l
~
9r
; !
1 j r Z
r
_ ` 2 ~ 4 ~ ~ / 4 . •
► ~
_ - ' - - ~ , ^j' ~
~=~~s„~~►'u~aw.W`w;
~ ` ¢ I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ : . • 1'~ ~ a
, E~ % 9 ~ ` ~ ` ~ ~ R/iir•,._~ ~ ' ~C'~ ~
A
C
+
`1 ` 2 ~ ♦ a. ~ r 1
~
. • ~
~
~ % ~ ~ ~ t ► - '~-a
.
. ♦
i ~
i
V_ _ f f 1 ► ~j \ 1 1
/ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ► y ~~''~r i;
~
L
I •
Conversation Record
~
s~~cmm _
Development services nepartment
Division of Engin,eering and Roads
(509) 477-3600
Fax (509) 477-7655
Date: Apri19, 2002 Time: 10:00 a.m.
With: Susan Murphy Company: CLC Associates
Recorded by: Cindy Callan P6one:
Subject: P1414J Riverwalk 11th Addition
Telephone Call: X Conference Cali: Meeting:
Disregard comment #1 on the review letter dated Apri12, 2002 that pertains to the Pond E
design. Upon further review, the pond design is acceptable in this specific situation where Pond
E is just being considereti for `208' treatment and not for storage volume. It appea.rs that once
the pond is full the flow will bypass to Pond A.
w ~
Callan, Cindy
From: Susan Murphy [smurphy@clc-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 6:41 PM
To: . 'Callan, Cindy'
Subject: RE: Riverwalk 11 th
Cindy:
Thanks for the reply. I don't agree that this was the situation on either
Vista Place or Windsor Ridge, as Vista Place had offsite runoff entering a
piped system, then being brought to the surface on another plat, which we
eventually kept in a pipe system. At windsor Ridge, the swales are sloped,
and the system was originally proposed to accept runoff from the roadway and
then the downstream inlets allowed it to re-enter the roadway. I don't see
the proposed curb inlet as a discharge mechanism in this instance - once the
pond is full, isn't the runoff bypassing the curb inlet and moving down to
the next pond? I'm not sure where the additional runoff would come into
play, as the curb inlet is designed to only take a certain amount of flow. I
don't see that volume re-entering the roadway, but rather the volume being
infiltrated in the Pond over the required 72 hour period in that specific
drainage facility, with the rest being bypass. Also to be noted is that the
storm volume for the combined basin does not include this pond volume, as it
is assumed that it is already full, so the flow calculated in the roadway is
already for the total storm volume. I would be interested to know if there
are problems the County has seen in relation to these types of ponds, for my
own education. Having said that, I have called the client and recommended a
Type A drywell in this pond, as Pond A already encroaches into the lot a
fair amount, so I do not want to enlarge the pond, and this isn't enough of
a problem to warrant any big discussion. We design very few lot ponds
anymore, but will pass on to the rest of the staff that this situation is no
longer acceptable. I did want to make note that I did not deem it the same
circumstance as either Windsor Ridge or Vista Place.
Condron's attorney is researching the HOA situation, and is prepared to
write the reciprocal agreement if the aggregate of the various Riverwalks is
not in place. I also spoke with Greg Figg today about the westbound signal
and the bonding requirement. He told me he would have an answer this week,
so Condrons can take care of that. I expect to have the plans back in to you
on Wednesday, as the contractor is moving forward with sewer and water
construction, so curbs won't be far behind.
Thanks,
Susan
-----Original Message-----
From: Callan, Cindy [mailto:CCallanQspokanecounty.org]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:28 PM
To: 'smurphy@clc-inc.com'
Cc: Hohman, John
Subject: RE: Riverwalk llth
Hi Susan.
Regarding the Pond E design; the roadway can be used as the emergency
overflow, however, it cannot be used as the only discharge mechanism for a
pond. The roadway curb/gutter system is intended to collect runoff from the
roadway and route it to the drainage facility. Stormwater cannot be
collected
and redirected back onto the roadway. We are aware that this has been
allowed
in the past; however, it is an ineffective design with numerous drawbacks.
1
f/ , / 4 \
l I
The
additional flow on the roadway creates a safety hazard during freezing
conditions, and the runoff that receives 1208' treatment in Pond E will be
recontaminated when it re-enters the roadway. This is consistent with
review
comments from our department on recent projects submitted by your office
such
as Vista Place and Windsor Ridge. Please call me or John if you would like
to
discuss this matter further.
Thank you,
Cindy
Cindy D. Callan, E.I.T.
Plan Review Engineer
Development Services
Division of Engineering and Roads
ccallan@spokanecounty.org
(509) 477-3600
-----Original Message-----
From: Susan Murphy [mailto:smurphy@clc-inc.comJ '
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 7:19 PM
To: CCallan@spokanecounty.org
Subject: Riverwalk llth
Cindy.
Received your comments on Riverwalk llth and have addressed all but a
couple. The DOT requirement was not on your list, but I spoke with Greg Figg
on Monday and asked him to send me a letter about the per lot cost the DOT
will require the developer to bond in order to satisfy that condition. Also,
Craig Condron, the sponsor, has brought most of Riverwalk - everything
except 7th, which is south of Indiana Avenue, into one HOA. Jerry
Trunkenbolz, a local attorney, called me today to get info from me to do the
CC&Rs, so that is in the works as well. I would propose that a letter from
the attorney indicating the language proposed for the HOA and accompanying
CC&Rs would suffice until the actual CC&Rs are ready, to indicate that a
reciprocal agreement would not be necessary for the use of Riverwalk and
Shannon Lanes by neighboring plats. What do you think?
The only other item I have any concern about is your first comment, which
deals with Basins A and E. Pond E is a pond without an outlet structure, but
the curb inlet proposed is obviously placed to allow a certain volume to be
captured and diverted to Pond E. It was sized to satisfy the 1208'
requirement for upstream impervious areas - driveways and street area, and
once full, runoff will then bypass this area and continue down to Pond A,
which is the terminus of the drainage basin. The bowstring calculation of
the Basin A+E is for the storm event, and incorporates the drywell discharge
in the analysis. We have many ponds like this in plats, but don't use them
as much anymore as most developers prefer to put storm drainage facilities
in a tract (or have to if the facility is more than 1200 SF, as you know).
If you have any questions or comments about this, please give me a call. We
are ready to resubmit once this item and the HOA and DOT issues are
resolved.
Thank you,
Susan
2
.
S P O K A N E O U N T Y
DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Apri12, 2002
John Saywers, P.E.
CLC Associates, Inc.
707 W. 7~' Avenue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
Subject: P1414J Riverwalk 11th Addition
Road and Drainage Submittal #1
Dear John,
We reviewed your March 22, 2002 submittal of the design documents for this project. The following
items need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans:
1. According to the Bowstring spreadsheet calculations in the Drainage Report, it appears that Ponds
A and E should be connected. The plans do not show a connection between Ponds A and E, and
Pond E is shown with no outlet. Please revise the plans to correct this discrepancy.
2. Please provide a detail for the "heavy-duty sidewalk" specified in Detail6 on Sheet 4.
3. The length "L" needs to be specified for all type 1 curb inlets (Standard Plan B-8).
4. The note on the bottom, right side of Sheet 4 needs to specify that soil tests are required for all of
the ponds.
5. Standard note number 7 from Appendix B of the Guidelines for StormwaterManagement needs
to be added to the plaas.
6. Please verify that the text and the attachments in the Operation & Maintenance Manual have been
updated to correspond to this project. The submitted attachments are for the Summerwood
Second Addition project.
7. Please provide documentation that a reciprocal agreement has been established that gives lot
owners permission to access the private roads adjacent to this plat and other plats, as necessary, in
order to access the public roadway system. 8. A draft of the homeowners association CC&Rs needs to be submitted to our department for
review.
1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd iloor) s i~-7428 (3rd Fioor) ~`'r:r ''Q77-7133
,
- -
Thank you for your attention to these issues. If you have any questions about this review, please contact
Cindy Callan at 477-3600.
Sincerely,
John V. Hohman, P.E.
Development Services Engineer/Manager
~
Cindy D. Ca an, E.I.T.
Plan Review Engineer
cc: Craig and Linda Condron, project applicants
Susan Murphy, CLC Associates, Inc., project manager
Jason Langbehn, Spokane County Planning, project coordinator
~
J { t
.
March 22, 2002 C L C A 5 5 0 C I AT E 5
CLC #S000177 RECEIVED
Spokane County Public Works MAR 2 2 2002
Engineering Developmerrt Servioes
1026 W. Broadway Avenue gpOKANE GOUNTY ENIGIM
Spokane, Washington 99260-0170
Attn: Cindy Callan, E.I.T.
RE: Riverwalk 11"' Addition - Street and Storm Drainage Submittal #1 pFFICiAL pU8L1C DOCUMENT
BPOKANE CDUMtY ENGINFERis aMcE .
Dear Cindy: ORIGINAL ;
P 1 y I,l,~
Enctosed please find the following, submitted for your review: pMC1'#
SUBMf'fTAL
■ A completed, signed submittal checklist. RMRN T4 COUNTY ENGINEfR
■ One copy of the street and storm drainage plans, stamped, signed our client, then
stamped, signed and dated by John F. Saywers, P.E..
■ One copy of the drainage report, basin map and calculations, stamped, signed and
dated by John F. Saywers, P.E..
■ A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Pian, as required by the latest Extension of
Time.
■ An inspection agreemerYt signed by our client and our principal in charge.
■ An Operations and Mairrtenance Manual for the drainage facilities.
■ Lot plans for all ponds located on residential lots. They are stamped, signed and dated
by John F. Saywers, P.E.
We are requesting on our clierrt's behalf that the pavement section for the proposed Riverwalk
and Shannon Lanes match the existing sections for both Riverwalk Lane and Shannon Lane as
they were designed for Riverwalk Vh and Riverwalk 9th. Our firm has designed all of the previous
roads at Riverwalk, and have found the soils to be uniform across the site. In addition, the
length of proposed road is very short, less than 250 feet on Riverwalk Lane and less than 400
feet on Shannon Lane.
We are also requesting that the developer be allowed to move forward with sewer consVuction.
The plans have been submitted to County Utilities, reviewed and re-submitted on mylar, and are
awaiting release. With very little roadway to design and existing roadway elevations to be
matched, there is not much that can be modified from our design prior to approval and what is
707 WEST 7TH AVENUE • SUITE 200 • SPOKANE • WA 99204 • P 509 458 6840 • F 509 456 6844
DENVER • SPOKANE • SALT LAKE CITY
r
ti f► - . -
normally the subsequent refease of the sewer plans.
Please give me a call if you have any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
CLC ASSOCIATES
Susan Murphy
Project Manager
skm
cc: file
Catlan, Cindy _
From: Callan, Cindy
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:26 AM
To: Susan Murphy (E-maii)
Cc: Hohman, John
Subject: P1414J Riverwalk 11th Addition - design deviation
Hi Susan.
Jol1n and I agree that a design deviation is not necessary for thc proposed roadway section for this project, since it provides
more than the Sta.ndards require for a private road. 1 Nvill :eave the design deviatien and the fee at thc f.ont desk for you to
pick up.
Thank you,
Cindy Cindy D. Callan, E.I.T.
Pl~.n Review Enguleer
Development Services
Division of Engineering and Roads
ccullanQspokanecounty.org
(509) 477-3600
1
;
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hohman, John
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 8:24 AM
To: Langbehn, Jason
Cc: Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott; Baldwin, Greg; Little, Colleen; Sims, Brenda; Peterschmidt,
Lucy
Subject: PE-1414-81 Riverwalk 11 th Addition
7-5-01
The project is not ready for final plat due to the following:
• Road or drainage plans have -not been received for this project.
• Drainage language and bond amounts have not been worked out with the developer.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
John V. Hohman, P.E.
1
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE
AND
DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
MANUAL
PiECE~VE--t)
APR 1 ~ yofi)
Riverwalk SPAI ~(E COUf~~' tF~gI~Y~
I1 th Addition
CLC #S000177 OFRCIAl. PUBLlC DOCUMENT
April, 2002 G SPOKANE COUMY ENGINEER'S OFFlCE
OR G NAL
PROJECT # P 1 ti 14 S
SU6M(TTAL # oL
RETURN TG COUtiTY ENG!"oEER
By
C.L.C. Associates, Inc.
707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
(509) 458-6840
I
"
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
1.00 PURPOSE
This document is intended to provide general operations and maintenance guidelines for the drainage
conveyance systems, ponds and other drainage facilities located within the Riverwalk 11th Addition plat.
Implementation of these guidelines will insure that the drainage facilities installed will function as intended
in the design.
2.00 INTRODUCTION
Generally, the drainage system is intended to collect upgradient stormwater runoff and convey it through
the development to one of seven of the storage ponds. The drainage facilities consist primarily of a series
of onsite drainage structures, storm pipes, treatment/storage ponds, and infiltration structures. It is of the
utmost importance to provide adequate operations and maintenance activities to insure that the drainage
facilities remain silt or dirt free, as this silt or dirt loading will affect the performance of the storm pipes,
ponds and infiltration structures. If these facilities were to become completely clogged, the only remedy
would be complete reconstruction the drainage facilities. Therefore, periodic maintenance is a must. A full
set of engineering drawings is available for review at Spokane County Public Works. A site layout exhibit
is provided in the Appendix of this document.
3.00 GENERAL OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
The drainage facilities for Riverwalk 11th Addition are very simple, functional, and have low maintenance
requirements. A periodic visual inspection of the facilities will identify any required maintenance. Most
maintenance will consist of keeping the pipes, structures and ponds free of debris and sediment. A
specific inspection schedule should be followed. See Section 4.0 for recommended maintenance
schedules.
3.10 Drainaae Structures and Storm Pipes
The onsite drainage conveyance system includes concrete gutters, curb inlets, concrete inlets
and 12" PVC storm pipe. Concrete gutters convey the onsite runoff, collected in the streets, to the
treatmenUstorage swales, located on 7 of the 20 residential lots.
CLC Associates Page 1 of 5 Riverwalk 1 1th Addition
' ' \I
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
3.20 Drainaqe Ponds
Stormwater storage ponds were used in the design of the Riverwalk 11th Addition plat to provide
storage for the runoff created by the development. The storage volume for each pond was
designed to adequately contain the runoff created 50-year storm event within the drainage basin
it serves.
Each pond is enclosed within earthen berms. The pond volume includes the level portion of the
floor of the swale and the sideslopes up to the outlet or overflow elevation. The soil located in the
floor of the swale shall be a medium to well draining material, with a minimum infiltration rate of
0.5 inches per hour.
Pond specifications are provided in Table 3.20A. Additional information is provided in the
engineering drawings on file at Spokane County Public Works, file PN-1656-92.
Table 3.20A - Pond Specifications
Pond Pond Btm. Pond Btm. Treatment Outlet Berm
Label Elev. Area(SF) Volume(CF) Eleu. Elev.
A 2019.69 312 261 2020.36 2021.36
B 2019.46 775 595 2020.13 2021.23
C 2018.90 540 429 2019.57 2021.23
D 2020.18 400 335 2020.85 2021.95
E 2021.44 220 189 2022.51 2023.21
3.30 Infiltration Structures
Pond B has one double-depth (Spokane County Standard Type B) drywell, and is used to infiltrate
stormwater runoff beyond the required treatment volume. Swale C has two double-depth (Spokane
County Standard Type B) drywells, all are used to infiltrate stormwater runoff beyond the required
treatment volume. A copy of the Spokane County Standard Plan B-1 a Precast Drywells Placed in
Swales is provided in the Appendix for reference. These structures consist of a grated inlet,
perforated concrete barrel sections, and buried washed drain rock, wrapped in porous filter fabric.
The grate inlet elevation is set six inches above the swale bottom to provide a stilling basin below
the overflow elevation of the drywell grate. The barrel sections and washed drain rock provide
additional storage during infiltration.
4.00 MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULES
Below is a maintenance description for each of the drainage system elements contained within the
Riverwalk 11`h Addition plat, including the drainage structures, pipes, grate inlets, ditches and ponds. All
drainage facilities located outside of the County road right-of-way, are expected to be maintained by the
CLC Associates Page 2 of 5 Riverwalk 1 1`h Addition
- - \
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
homeowner's association; any drainage facilities located on individual residential lots are to be maintained
by the respective homeowners. Should the homeowner's association be terminated for any reason, the
maintenance responsibilities will become that of the individual homeowners, located within the Riverwalk
11th Addition plat.
The homeowner's association shall provide to the Spokane County Parks Department and the Spokane
County Engineer the name, address, and 24-hour telephone number for the entity responsible for
performing routine and emergency maintenance inspections and repairs. This information shall be
confirmed on a yearly basis. The homeowner's association shall provide notice of any changes to the
Spokane County Parks Department and the Spokane County Engineer within 15 days of said changes.
General
Proper maintenance procedures are necessary for the continued functioning of the drainage facilities.
Improper maintenance, or lack of attentive maintenance measures, may result in negative drainage
impacts. It is strongly recommended that the homeowner's association designate an individual who will be
responsible for making sure the maintenance measures are implemented.
Generally, maintenance personnel are to conduct a visual inspection of the drainage facilities immediately
following a substantial rainfall event or snowmelt event. Substantial events include:
► Noticeably hard rain for a short period (30 minutes or more),
► Steady rain for a long period (6 hours or more), or
► Significant rainfall and/or snowmelt when the ground is frozen.
For long duration storms, longer than 24 hours, maintenance personnel are to inspect the drainage
facilities during the storm event to identify any developing problems and correct them before they become
major problems.
1. Inspect all roadside ditches and drainage structures (catch basins and drywells) to ensure
they are clear of debris and obstructions.
2. Inspect all pond berms and retaining walls for breaches. Immediately repair any berm
breaches with native sandy soil, compacted in place, and wall breaks with new concrete
blocks.
The above noted storm related visual inspections are in addition to the maintenance schedules noted
below for each item.
4.10 Drainaae Structures and Storm Pipes
Catch basins and pipes should be inspected every 3 months, or after every significant storm event
('/z") and/or snowmelt event, whichever is more frequent. Visually inspect the pipes, inlets and
outlets, making sure they are clear of debris and checking that the pipe is in good condition, without
breaks or cracks. If there is any obstruction present it should be removed immediately.
A flow test in the pipe can be used to readily detect major obstructions or breaks in the pipe. This
CLC Associates Page 3 of 5 Riverwalk 19th Addition
•
~
. /
~ ~ I • ~
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
test requires a water source (hydrant or water truck) and a person at the downstream end of the
pipe observing the flow exiting out of the pipe section.
All catch basins should be cleaned (vacuumed) every 3 months.
4.20 Drainaqe Ponds
The drainage ponds should be inspected every 3 months, or after every significant rainfall and/or
snowmelt event, whichever is more frequent. The ponds consist of earthen depressions constructed
from native soils, enclosed within soil berms and/or block retaining walls. Each pond should be
sodded and/or hydro-seeded with a dryland grass mixture, at a minimum. A lawn sod can be used if
regular irrigating is implemented.
Routine maintenance and inspections of the pond will include removal of any accumulated debris,
such as leaves, weeds and trash. Any obstructions that would not allow water to flow freely from the
ponds via the outlet structures or overflow berms should be removed or repaired. Additionafly, the
berms and block walls of the ponds should be inspected to insure that they are in good repair and
structurally competent and that no outflow has occurred other than through the outlet structure or
overFlow berm.
The homeowner's association shall be responsible for replacement of any grass turf and underlying
1-foot depth of soil in ponds whenever the vegetation appears to indicate a problem due to
contamination. The turf and underlying soil shall meet Spokane County requirements for
permeability and cation exchange capacity/organic content in effect at the time of replacement.
4.30 Infiltration Structures
The infiltration structures should be inspected every 3 months, or after every significant rainfall
and/or snowmelt event, whichever is more frequent. These structures consist of a grated inlet,
perforated concrete barrel sections, and buried washed drain rock, wrapped in porous filter fabric.
During routine inspection, if standing water is found 72 hours or more after the last significant
rainfall event, the infiltration structure is most likely clogged due to silt and sediment. The structure
shall be vacuumed of standing water and sediment.
5.00 Recommended Set-Aside Funds
for Maintenance & Future Replacement Costs
There will be annual maintenance costs, major renovation costs and future replacement costs of the
drainage facilities. These costs are the responsibility of the homeowner's association or successors in
interest. Major renovation and future replacement costs have been converted to annual costs, in the form
of recommended set-aside funds. It is assumed that 1/2 of the pipe and two drywells will need to be
replaced within 20 years.
CLC Associates Page 4 of 5 Riverwalk 11rh Addition
. -
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Table S.OOA - Pipe Replacement
Pipe %2 Total Present Value Future
Size Length Per L.F. Total Value
10" PVC 6 $ 2.80 $ 16.80 $ 29.00
12" PVC 28 $ 3.30 $ 92•40 $ 162.00
TOTAL $ 191.00
The estimated annual maintenance costs and recommended annual set-aside costs are listed below in
Table 5.0013. It is recommended the homeowner's association set-aside these amount of funds annually,
to ensure that adequate maintenance and replacement measures of the drainage facilities will be
implemented.
Table 5.0013 - Maintenance and Future Replacement Costs
Drainage Facility Annual Maintenance Annual Set-Aside Funds for
Costs Future Replacement or
Major Renovation
Onsite Pipes & Drainage Structures $ 200 $128.00'
Drywells - Spokane County Type B $ 200 $ 128.00
Sub-total Annual Costs
$400 $256.00
Note: (1) Assume replacement in 20 yrs, with 4% inflation and a 6% rate of return on investments
for set-aside account.
Grand TotaUyear = $ 447.00 .
Cost per IoUyear = $ 22.35 (20 lots)
CLC Associates Page 5 of 5 Riverwalk 1 1 t'' Addition
,
. , .
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
TECHNICAL APPENDIX
SITE MAP
ONSITE SWALE DETAILS
PRECAST DRYWELL
CLC Associafes Page 6 of 5 Riverwalk 11th Addition
'
PLAT
60UNDARY
•~'~~-~~~,,.pw . . _ _
. ~A.1~li e Y✓3~q~.~~
.":.....:~._........_.«.....";~y_~•~-%"":;...~~y_,,....--' I
~ ^~\~,i p Vy111V1♦ .
"ar~r~. _n... r . " , ~ '
~ p . r.. •~:y...a:..'-.,~«r.....,........4... ,i.
~ ~ . . •^:ti~~•`. '
. - : -w-1 f ' ~ ~ __r~+t--~-""-' • j~- ^ ~ j ,p
~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7....~' ~ I ~ .
i 4
SOC re~Waj(R n~
or= r +n
O ' ~ _ ''~'r^ j^ ~ j j y..,`t-.~.l.-~...yi ~i-~,y;`~' ~ v.
CL -0i
n.4- jI' 1~„~'Ci - .'Y] ~ ~
W i ~ ~ +.,,~J• ~ w~~ '"A~~,}...A?''. , ,~...,...•;~i:~ + ~l
r ~,~Q 1 ~ ~ ~zt•• ~ ~ . ~
~ , ~ ~ , ~[~,~R~+~ , ,t µ ~ ~ Jl•• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~1„ ^ ..~.r+.r- r .
Q' ' ~ -M • i ~ l ^ ~ i ~ ~ ,r °.:r+'w' ' " ' " r+ ~ ~ ~ > ~ 4 ~ j ~ j
~ J ~ ",1.....•... . ~ ~i.~~..
z Q ~ i ~ ~ ~ ..a0^~«~n°'~~,... "~1,,..~.-^• ^ ..r-"~,a~,..~;~' 1 1....i....+,~'-4 ~ ! ~
L)li IfA
_ ~ I\IY flrrni.` r 1 ,,,ild9~ ,....?i T •.,,.',,,,~-1'wN.%~~{'~.~...5 Z, ~ ~ : '1 jV;,
Q .u•ri~ ~iA ~ t'~ ~M ^.~~~°M ~:N✓'"" ~ ~ '1 ~ , ~ \~/i~ ~ 1 ~
~ Q A n~~r~n~i ~ „ l„~~r.l.~. ~►i,, ~ , ti ~~„~-~~.x~ j ~ I ~ i f F' {
Q~~ UVII V~~ 3B
r---
, ~rw ,r / 1 ~ I;J~ y 1 ~ ( J~fl ~ j~ i ( ~
. W ~ K S1 u/ ~ ~ ~~~W ~e 1 ~ ~ :~`~.....~...20t9+ • J ~ 1,1ni.~A~r) , ~ ~ ~ ~ 4
Q „ . ~ , , ~ ~ ~ 1•~- •i~,uuiv~r ~ tz ~ ~ ~
`
Z
Q Q * ~ i i ~'~r ; ~ ~ ~ I i i
~ 1'' ~ ~ ~ ""~M t % "f
~ ~
f. i p~
~ ? I~•'~~ !r~ j 1 r '~'N,-' 1~~~ ~r~ ' ' f ~ ~ f 1
~
a • f ~ ~ ~'~~s 80UN
DAR
~ ~ .
W
rL
,
L I Q>
Z
p TRACT "
0 ~ Y ~ ~ A
~ lx
~ W , ~
=
W a , x• , ; , ~ ~ i
p
~ 1 << ,'`•,~l ~ \ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~1 ;~i • ~
3 ` , 1 ♦
C ~ • . er , , , - 'h'~ _ _ _ - _ , , = i
~ Y._..}
51
;pC f
r•i
PC ; I
46
~ t r ~ T q ' . :~~..Y;.. '✓A ~ r , ; (SQ ~
~ ~ ' ~ us. y. ~L Ir ~ , 1 Y• ~ 4
' ` - - - ~ - - 4-q
..r w.•~ , S.1 , 1 , '~t•• ~M,,' ~ ~ ; ' 1
j .,.,_...t. ~n ~ ~ 1 'v ~ ~ ; , ~ ~j
~ ~ 1~"~ OV~ < fa Y ~
a
. I 'I FI i ~ , ~ „ ~ /'C ~ \ ~ ~U
, _ ` ~ ` ; ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' M~n,r ` 0
filiri.
Ap ~y ~~,.•^'~1 ~nni.
t rrn~.r(1 ~ e
M*{~
\ n +
VYI,D~VSY
f'
~
~
' ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ` \~rauuiii~~~ /~jij
- I I I I ~ •-_1-~ ~ f \ ~ ~
U
- - - - - - - !i ~i ~ f I I ,.'~~'S , ti ~V+'~ .00'~`
' ~ .
.1 ~ 1~ ~ i~ ~
' ~ ~
~
~
t
R VER WALK :%.,LA
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦ .T,IPE 'R'
~ i ~cy ,N • ~ ~
~ ~
5* INA GE ~ p~~ U1ILIT
3 i
• RA
E4E1EN
i EAS
.
~ ~ ~ ~ z . P a t~
f~ / / ~ . i
\ T r~ I~ / iTroN ~
, ~ , ` i
f-\LJ
`of
n T 1 ~h
~
~
,
R VER WALK '
,
11TH 3 `
ADD T ON 2 ~
,
~ ~
e
• , ~
. •
.PO D
. ,
.
10' UTILITIL . ~ 5' DRAINAGE ~
EASEMENT EASEMENT TYP.
• ~ - 1
.
~ A~ _ ..~p TYp
.
p CUR
.
.
SH AN N ON
„ .o 18
LANE
- - ~ ~ - -
- ,
~
5
~ I ~I V I ~
TYP
I -E~~ I 6 CUR
- -
. .
I I
.
11124,10' UTILITY QN6 7' DRAINAGE
I /C I EASEMENT
E~SEMENT
.
~ . .
.
. I
,
4
,
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
%
~ p~,~1 pN
AD ,
,
,
,
,~-r ~ ~ c 1 1
,r
P p ~ 1 5~ pR ArN A~ ASEMENT V, ~
~ _-10' U~LITY
` E ASEMENT
1 ,
, ~
~ .
R VER WALK LAN E
,
N
i ~ ~ 31 v ~ CURB
/ ' m
r
♦ '
!
I
~ I
NE
LP ~
3 ~E ,R, u y
CURB
~ ~
8 1
► ~ ~ 5' DRAINAGE ` -
. 1
1 EASEMENT C~'
UTILITY
EASWENT \ c
,
- \0 2
.
3
2
-
N
,
.
,
1
\ `
, . .,;•r
.
. ORYWELL BARREL OR
GENERAL NOTES . caTCH easiN wnu
WATERPROOf ~ ~ PIPE (TYP.)
t, GRAVEL BAdtFiLL OUANIITY FOR ORTY~ELLS : NON-SHRINK NO~:
TVPE 'A' - JO CUBiC YARDS MINI~IUAI /42 TONS, CROUT
il?E '8' - 40 CUBIC YARDS MINIMUM / 58 TdNS, PVC PIPE AOAP?ERS ANO CAS!(ET MAY VART
IN SHAPE IIND SIZE AS IU.U51RA1E0 IN
OR AS SPEdREO ON ROAO PtANS. OETAIL 8Y ACCEPIABLE ALTERNATE tN
2 SPEpAI BAd(fill MATERIAL FOR ORYWELIS SHAII CONSIST Qf ACCOROANCE W1TH A.S.?.AI.-C-128.
WASHED GRAVEL GRAOED fR0M 1' TO 3' N1TH A NAXIMUII Of SX ~ASSINC TNE U.S. No, 200 SCREEN, AS AIEASUREO 81r WEICHI, ASKET
A MAXIMUM OF 10x OF THE ACCRECATE, AS NEASUREO BY WEIf~11, VC ADAPTER
SHALL BER ATU~RALLY OCCU RRNC UN~FRACN ED REMAINING Ox PVC ADAPTER
3. fABRIC SHALL 8E MOOERAIE SURV1VA81UTY AS OUiUNED (SAND COLLAR)
IN STANDARO SPEpRCA110NS 9-33
' 4. SEE STaN0aRO PLANS SHEEn 8-2 ANO B-3 fOR
PRECASt CONCREIE DETAILS. METa FRAAIE TYPE 4
5. AOJUSTMENT BLOCKS SHALL BE CEMENT CONCRE?E. PAY LIMITS GRA~ T1'PE 4~ MOR AR IN PUC
E 6. PRECAST RISER MAY BE USED IN COMBINATION METAI fRAME
WI1H OR IN UEU OF AOJUSIINC BLO(~(S. d~ CRAIE~ loillil
7. WIIEN PVC PIPE IS U~0 A PVC ADAPIER SHAII 8E INS?ALLED. '•",.t
8. PIPES SHALI 8E CROUTEO IN10 DRYWELLS. ~ TOP SOIL 0~,~IORTAREO ADJUSiAIENT
R(NCS
-i .
:
M gT~l pM
2'_0• .
f~ATE 1RYPE 4ME 4 ~ BEL COBAFILL
MPLETELY
~ I~DATAR IN PIACE TO
c CO ED WITH fABRIC ;
N ai
NLET PIPE
~ tOP SOIL i
fi•=~ ;'~'y''MORTAREO
,•`•,1 AOJUSTI~IENT RINCS •'~I . ~
~ GRAVEL BACKF1l1
:
, TO BE COMPLEiELT ..1 ~ m
wA TM z'-o' s~ No~ 7 o
o cov~R~o
' N FABRIC
~
ONSEiECINk i .~i
~
INLET PIPE GRAVEL ;I SEEPAfE POA1S. ~
j ~
a~ BACKFlLI, SEE OETAIL, SHT. NQ
~ FABRIC UNER
~~`IN~ z a
BAp(E~LL,
<
~ s~E 7 W
~ 4 SEE DET~UL,~SHEET 8-2 FABRIC UNER a
`
MM IN:
• ,,:'1.: t .t,;';1; t k~,
S~LSNRBEO QISNR9E0
DRYWELL - TYPE 'A' SWALE D YWELL - TYPE 'B' SWALE
i i SPOKANE COUNTY APPROVED: stte~
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ~ Na STANDARO
A. ~f~ ~cuNc, wA. 99200 4x-3e00 oAtt?~ m,;f PRECAST DRYINELLS PLACED 1N SWALES e-to
,
y . F ' , • '
RECE VED -
MAR 2 2 Z0oz - Submittal Checklist
for Road & Draina ge ProJ'ects in SPokane CountY - Plats/Sho~~~~~~ - Y~
.This Submittal Checklist is to be completed and signed by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included with each plan
submittal into the Spokane County Engineers Office. If this form is not fully completed and signed, do not
submit plarrs and calculations to Spokane County for review and acceptance. Incomplete submittols will be
- returned and will cause unnecessary delays for your client. . .
. .
~l Av=0
Project Name: ~
SPokane CountY ProJ'ect No. *PG - 1414 -3 r Date:
. .
ectEngineer. ~►~1~1'' ..~D~~1 ~ Phone. 4 Sg
Project Sponsor: Phone: _C~~ 1:~, t I .0-40--t A lot A. 'Preliminary Process , Prior to Submittal of Road and Drainage Plans, the following events are to have already occurred: (By checking each item offshown below, you are stnting that you have verifred these events/items have been completed_)V i
Adoption of a Hearing Examiaer's Report for this long plat, or a Planning Report for this short plat. '
At least one Pre-Design Meeting has been held with County staff at the En&eers Office_
~ An "Agreement to Pay Fees" has been signed by the project sponsor, and submitted to the County .
• Engineers Office. - - 0 A Charmelization Plan (e.g. signing and striping plan) of public ro dway improvements, has been .
coordinated and discussed with the County Enoeers Office. AfI .
B. Road and Drainage Plan Submittal - 'The items listed below are to be provided as a minimum with a road and drainage plan submittal. Add.itional
information may be required to demonstrate that the plans meet all applicable standards.
(By checking "yes"jor each item shown below, you are verifying thvt these items have been completed and are included
in this submittal. For crny box checked `rr/a'; cr written justification of any omissions at the end oj this section is. required) , ' -
Item Description pnte, •
9' yes ~ Road and drainage plans, prd'print sets. (Certification statement on cover of plans)
O yes Vo'n/a One set of plans on 24" x 36" mylar media, or CAD electronic file .DWG or.DXF format
. B000yes Each Plan Sheet of record is signed and dated by the project sponsor.
Vyes ; The road and drainage design meets the requirements of State law, WAC 196-27 regarding -
-"conformity with accepted standards"; that is, the design reflects. the "state of the practice" .
for the proposed concept. R`"yes The 'plans, Drainage Report, basin map(s), and any other calculations are stamped, signed
~ and dated by an engineer licens~ in the State of Washington. (~Yyes 0 n/a Drainage Report, ' s ts. To iticlude: basin map(s), time of concentration routes in basin
. ma and Certificatement on cover of re rt and basin ma
~ ~ ~ r- Q~~PUBUC DQGUMEff_
0 yes ~n~a Geotechnical Report, one set. (Include all soil test pit/boring ldg"E CQ(JNTY Q1iONEEA'$ QFACE ~
~ .
0 yes V Structural Pavement, Calculations, one set ORIGINAL
'0 yes fflro'orida Cross-slope grade calculations for road widening projects. ppp,,)ECT # t PAN,~' SUBMITTAI. # 1 - :
. . RETURN TO COUNTY ENGINEER .
S 1. _ - • ' `
~ , .
, . ,
Item Description -
Vyes 0 n/a Maintenance Manual and Sinking Fund calculations for drainage facilities located outside of
. 110 County road right-of-way.
Vyes •O n/a Written explanation of who/what entity will be responsible for maintaining drainage €acilities
which are located outside of public road right-of,-way, and that the plan is acceptable to the
~ County Engineers Office. 0 yes "a Channelization Plan, or signing and striping information provided in the road plans. To be
. / incIuded in road and drainage plan set. .
'*0*y*`es D n/a I have read the Hearing Examiner's Report (long plat), or Planning Dept. Findings and Conditions (short plat), for this project. The design meets the conditions in the report_
Q yi~-. "a Copy of Approved Design Deviations. L - ye,s D n/a Fire District Approval, for private roads.
W'ey'es O n/a Lot Plans. Required for any lots with drainage easemenis and which front a public road, or for lots which receive and treat runoff from a public right-of-way. ~
0 yes Bon/a Any applicable State and Federal permits have been obtained_ (i.e. HPA, 1ARPA, etc.). For
Permits with conditions, a copy of tbe permit and conditions are included in the plan
submittal. . es 0 n/a Inspection Agreement between the sponsor and its engineer. O yes POIi/a For off-site easements to be granted to. Spokane County, the following items shall be included: legal description, exhibit, and proof of ownership.
WoOey'es O n/a Erosion Control Plan, required for "Major Land-Disturbing Activity." To be included in the
road and drainage plan set. _
Explanation for any items listed above which are n t included in ihis submittat: ire" TDt-9~,r~
, . V10C ire~vj .
(Note: an insufficient justifi 'on of why an item was not included in the submitted, or incomplete documents, may result
in the submittal being returned without review or without acceptance. Provide attachments if necessary.)
By signing below, the engineer is stating that the information provided in the submittal is complete, that the
- infocmation provided in the Submittal Checklist is accurate, and the plans and calculations are in accordance with -
. the Spokane County Standard for Road & Sewer Construction, and the Guidelines for Stormwater -
Management, except where al p oved esign Deviation allows otherwise. Engine-Ir's Signature: Date: ~j Z 1 OZ
Engineer's Name:. ~
' (please print) . If there are any questions about this form or appropriate proeedures, please call Development Services,
S,pokane County Public N'orks, at (509) 456-3600.
' For Spokane County Use Only . ~
. Submittal No: ~ County Plan Reviewer: Gtrtidy
t
~ Accepted in for Review or Construction
.0. Returned-to the engineer,without review and/or acceptance, See attached letter of explanation.
Processing Date: 3 i a,a, ~oo~ ' . .
Submittal Checklist 2
Spokane County Public Works; Apri129, 1998
a . _
RECEIVEp
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE
AN D MaR 2 2 2001
DRAINAGE PONDS SP0KMEG0U~~OMM
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
MANUAL
Riverwalk 11th Addition
CLC #S000177
March, 2002
By
C.L.C. Associates, Inc.
707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200
Spokane, WA 99204
(509) 458-6840
OfFlClAL PUBUC DOCUMENr
r BPOKANE GOUIIiTY ENGINEER'S OFFtCE
~ OR GINAL
PROJECT * P ty i4S
SUBMtTTAI # I
RETURN TO COUNTY ENGlNEER
' - -
.
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
1.00 PURPOSE
This document is intended to provide general operations and maintenance guidelines for the drainage
conveyance systems, ponds and other drainage facilities located within the Riverwalk 11`h Addition plat.
Implementation of these guidelines will insure that the drainage facilities installed will function as intended
in the design.
2.00 INTRODUCTION
Generally, the drai s stem is intended to coll t u gradient stormwater runoff and convey it through
the development t he drainage facilities consist primarily of a series
of onsite drainage structures, storm pipes, trea men orage ponds, and infiltration structures. It is of the
utmost importance to provide adequate operations and maintenance activities to insure that the drainage
facilities remain silt or dirt free, as this silt or dirt loading will affect the performance of the storm pipes,
ponds and infiltration structures. If these facilities were to become completely clogged, the only remedy
would be complete reconstruction the drainage facilities. Therefore, periodic maintenance is a must. A full
set of engineering drawings is available for review at Spokane County Public Works. A site layout exhibit
is provided in the Appendix of this document.
3.00 GENERAL OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
The drainage facilities for Riverwalk 11th Addition are very simple, functional, and have low maintenance
requirements. A periodic visual inspection of the facilities will identify any required maintenance. Most
maintenance will consist of keeping the pipes, structures and ponds free of debris and sediment. A
specific inspection schedule should be followed. See Section 4.0 for recommended maintenance
schedules.
3.10 Drainaqe Structures and Storm Piqes
The onsite drainage conveyance system includes concrete gutters, curb inlets, concrete inlets
and 12" PVC storm pipe. Concrete gutters convey the onsite runoff, collected in the streets, to the
treatmenVstorage swales, located on 7 of the 20 residential lots.
CLC Associates Page 1 of 5 Rivervva/k 11 rh Addition
, , • ,
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
3.20 Drainaqe Ponds
Stormwater storage ponds were used in the design of the Riverwalk 11 th Addition plat to provide
storage for the runoff created by the development. The storage volume for each pond was
designed to adequately contain the runoff created 50-year storm event within the drainage basin
it serves.
Each pond is enclosed within earthen berms. The pond volume includes the level portion of the
floor of the swale and the sideslopes up to the outlet or overflow elevation. The soil located in the
floor of the swale shall be •a medium to well draining material, with a minimum infiltration rate of
0.5 inches per hour.
Pond specifications are provided in Table 3.20A. Additional information is provided in the
engineering drawings on file at Spokane County Public Works, file PN-1656-92.
Table 3.20A - Pond Specifications
Pond ON B Out~let rev. Area(SF) Volume(CF) Elev. Elev.
A 2019.69 312 261 2020.36 2021.36
B 2019.46 775 595 2020.13 2021.23
C 2018.90 540 429 2019.57 2021.23
D 2020.18 400 335 2020.85 2021.95
E 2021.44 220 189 2022.51 2023.21
3.30 Infiltration Structures
Pond B has one double-depth (Spokane County Standard Type B) drywell, and is used to infiltrate
stormwater runoff beyond the required treatment volume. Swale C has two double-depth (Spokane
County Standard Type B) drywells, all are used to infiltrate stormwater runoff beyond the required
treatment volume. A copy of the Spokane County Standard Plan B-1 a Precast Drywells Placed in
Swales is provided in the Appendix for reference. These structures consist of a grated inlet,
perforated concrete barrel sections, and buried washed drain rock, wrapped in porous filter fabric.
The grate inlet elevation is set six inches above the swale bottom to provide a stilling basin below
the overflow elevation of the drywell grate. The barrel sections and washed drain rock provide
additional storage during infiltration.
4.00 MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULES
Below is a maintenance description for each of the drainage system elements contained within the
Riverwalk 11th Addition plat, including the drainage structures, pipes, grate inlets, ditches and ponds. All
drainage facilities located outside of the County road right-of-way, are expected to be maintained by the
CLC Associates Page 2 of 5 Riverwalk 11th Addition
- -
. , .
, ~ .
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
homeowner's association; any drainage facilities located on individual residential lots are to be maintained
by the respective homeowners. Should the homeowner's association be terminated for any reason, the
maintenance responsibilities will become that of the individual homeowners, located within the Riverwalk
11'h Addition plat.
The homeowner's association shall provide to the Spokane County Parks Department and the Spokane
County Engineer the name, address, and 24-hour telephone number for the entity responsible for
performing routine and emergency maintenance inspections and repairs. This information shall be
confirmed on a yearly basis. The homeowner's association shall provide notice of any changes to the
Spokane County Parks Department and the Spokane County Engineer within 15 days of said changes.
General
Proper maintenance procedures are necessary for the continued functioning of the drainage facilities.
Improper maintenance, or lack of attentive maintenance measures, may result in negative drainage
impacts. It is strongly recommended that the homeowner's association designate an individual who will be
responsible for making sure the maintenance measures are implemented.
Generally, maintenance personnel are to conduct a visual inspection of the drainage facilities immediately
following a substantial rainfall event or snowmelt event. Substantial events include:
► Noticeably hard rain for a short period (30 minutes or more),
► Steady rain for a long period (6 hours or more), or
► Significant rainfall and/or snowmelt when the ground is frozen.
For long duration storms, longer than 24 hours, maintenance personnel are to inspect the drainage
facilities during the storm event to identify any developing problems and correct them before they become
major problems.
1. Inspect all roadside ditches and drainage structures (catch basins and drywells) to ensure
they are clear of debris and obstructions.
2. Inspect all pond berms and retaining walls for breaches. Immediately repair any berm
breaches with native sandy soil, compacted in place, and wall breaks with new concrete
blocks.
The above noted storm related visual inspections are in addition to the maintenance schedules noted
below for each item.
4.10 DrainaQe Structures and Storm Pipes
Catch basins and pipes should be inspected every 3 months, or after every significant storm event
('/2') and/or snowmelt event, whichever is more frequent. Visually inspect the pipes, inlets and
outlets, making sure they are clear of debris and checking that the pipe is in good condition, without
breaks or cracks. If there is any obstruction present it should be removed immediately.
A flow test in the pipe can be used to readily detect major obstructions or breaks in the pipe. This
CLC Associates Page 3 of 5 Riverwalk 91`h Addition
. -
. .
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
test requires a water source (hydrant or water truck) and a person at the downstream end of the
pipe observing the flow exiting out of the pipe section.
All catch basins should be cleaned (vacuumed) every 3 months.
4.20 Drainaqe Ponds
The drainage ponds should be inspected every 3 months, or after every significant rainfall and/or
snowmelt event, whichever is more frequent. The ponds consist of earthen depressions constructed
from native soils, enclosed within soil berms and/or block retaining walls. Each pond should be
sodded and/or hydro-seeded with a dryland grass mixture, at a minimum. A lawn sod can be used if
regular irrigating is implemented.
Routine maintenance and inspections of the pond will include removal of any accumulated debris,
such as leaves, weeds and trash. Any obstructions that woufd not allow water to flow freely from the
ponds via the outlet structures or overflow berms should be removed or repaired. Additionally, the
berms and block walls of the ponds should be inspected to insure that they are in good repair and
structurally competent and that no outflow has occurred other than through the outlet structure or
overflow berm.
The homeowner's association shall be responsible for replacement of any grass turf and underlying
1-foot depth of soil in ponds whenever the vegetation appears to indicate a problem due to
contamination. The turf and underlying soil shall meet Spokane County requirements for
permeability and cation exchange capacity/organic content in effect at the time of replacement.
4.30 Infiltration Structures
The infiltration structures should be inspected every 3 months, or after every significant rainfall
and/or snowmelt event, whichever is more frequent. These structures consist of a grated inlet,
perforated concrete barrel sections, and buried washed drain rock, wrapped in porous filter fabric.
During routine inspection, if standing water is found 72 hours or more after the last significant
rainfall event, the infiltration structure is most likely clogged due to silt and sediment. The structure
shall be vacuumed of standing water and sediment.
5.00 Recommended Set-Aside Funds
for Maintenance & Future Replacement Costs
There will be annual maintenance costs, major renovation costs and future replacement costs of the
drainage facilities. These costs are the responsibility of the homeowner's association or successors in
interest. Major renovation and future replacement costs have been converted to annual costs, in the form
of recommended set-aside funds. It is assumed that 1/2 of the pipe and two drywells will need to be
replaced within 20 years.
CLC Associafes Page 4 of 5 Riverwalk 11 t`' Addition
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
Table S.OOA - Pipe Replacement
Pipe '/2 Total Present Value Future
Size Length Per L.F. Total Value
10" PVC 6 $ 2.80 $ 16.80 $ 29.00
12" PVC 28 $ 3.30 $ 92•40 $ 162.00
TOTAL $ 191.00
The estimated annual maintenance costs and recommended annual set-aside costs are listed below in
Table 5.0013. It is recommended the homeowner's association set-aside these amount of funds annually,
to ensure that adequate maintenance and replacement measures of the drainage facilities will be
implemented.
Table 5.0013 - Maintenance and Future Replacement Costs
Drainage Facility Annual Maintenance Annual Set-Aside Funds for
Costs Future Replacement or
Major Renovation
Onsite Pipes & Drainage Structures $ 200 $128.00
Drywells - Spokane County Type B $ 200 $ 128.00
Sub-total Annual Costs
$400 $256.00
Note: (1) Assume replacement in 20 yrs, with 4% inflation and a 6% rate of return on investments
for set-aside account.
Grand Total/year = $ 447.00
Cost per lot/year = $ 22.35 (20 lots)
CLC Associates Page 5 of 5 Riverwalk 1 1th Addition
, .
1I ~
STORMWATER CONVEYANCE AND DRAINAGE PONDS
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL
TECHNICAL APPENDIX
SITE MAP
ONSITE SWALE DETAILS
PRECAST DRYWELL
CLC Associates Riverwalk 11th Addition
. . . . .I . , .1 • 1 ' !
. . .--..r.....e ....~n..~....... ....~....e~ . . . .r.~.....• • I " .~r 'r. . r.........r. . . .
wRACw ' 'B' '
5 6 ,
1 ^~I ,
1827
. 54' ~
~ ' POND "A'
`'~23"-BTM= TYPE "B" DRYWELL W/TYPE 4
- - - ~ 1826.42' METAL TR-~~C"-&', GRATE, PER
~ I o 0c)SP4K'ANE COUNT'Y, STANDARD ;
,,..~~~-PLANS B-1a & 131-,15. .
STA 10+64.40, 38"\LT.
.
RIM EL.=1826.57
TYPE I CURB INLET, PER
SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD
PLAN B-8 THIS SHEET. ~ C'7
STA 10+30.80, 59.94' LT.
TC EL. =1827. 82' ~ o 11
FL EL.=1827.32'. NOTE 2" EVAN LANE\
DEPRESSION PER SPOKANE I tK . . COUNTY STANDARDS.
4I
1
PO\:) B DE'A~ 5
1 20'
POND BOTTOM EL.=1826.07' ~
POND BOTTOM AREA=2243 S.F.
PREIMETER=231 L.F.
PROVIDED STORM VOLUME=2820 C.F. MIN. BERM EL.=1829'
SEE GRADING . DETAIL AT LEFT. TYPE I CURB INLET, PER , ~.1, ~ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD;::
PLAN 8-8 THIS SHEET. , . ,
STA 18+42.75, LT. . .
,
TC EL._ -1823.54,
Lc) Y~ ' r...~~• ` FL EL.=1823,04' NOTE 2"
.1826---/ ~ ti~ , DEPRESSION PER SPOKANE R A~~- 7j.. ' $2;....._ ' / ~'bN'r'% COUNTY STANDARDS.
`1$24.___ / i - ~b
..'~'823
~ ~ ~ , ' . _ ~ i ~
~ 1 ~ N ; . ~-ra2~
2~ - SEE PIPE PROFILE #2,,: . . . _ , .
SHEET 3
POND
~.~13TM= SEE PIPE PROFILE,"
j8zo.oo' SHEET 3
W ~
j
O
, n . ~ _ / 2 R , i,.,. •
NOTES c.>.
35 L.F. OF 12'PVC
y i ~~~%l~~r+i~~ ` ~
r l , r!r!, ! I.E.(N)=1818.0 ,
CONCRETE INLET TYPE I TYPE "8" DRYWELL TYPE "B" DRYWELL I,E,(S)=1817.65 W/TYPE 1 METAL FRAME AND W/TYPE 4 METAL W/TYPE 4 METAL - S=-0.0100 TYPE 2 GRATE, PER SPOKANE FRAME AND GRATE, FRAME AND GRATE, ..COUNTY STANDARD PLANS PER SPOKANE COUNTY PER SPOKANE ~ 30 L.F. OF 12" PVk.B-5, 8-10, & B-13. STANDARD PLANS COUNTY STANDARD I.E.(W)=1817.15
STA 17+32.03, 57.5' LT. B-1 a& 8-15. PLANS 8-1 a& B-15 I.E.(E)=1817.15
RIM EL.=1820,5 STA 17+309 23' LT. STA 17+60, 23' LT. S=0.0000 RIM EL.=1824.3 RIM EL.=1823,9 ~
POND C DETA L
:
, 20'
:POND 80TTOM EL.=1820.0
. POND BOTTOM AREA=2831 S.F.
. , PERIMETER = 313 L.F.
PROVIDED STORM VOLUME=3613 C.F. ~
MIN. BERM EL.=1823.0 r.
IIa140~~Y1• L..Y
~f' ~~~I fl~~Ql~'
UNPLATiEO ~jt~t
v. AA ' ~6 +q~
~ im BM
~
.oio ~umn ,
~
11 i`~
~
1 ~ ~
tib ~
~ . Ae ue Ac p' 2.H w `~p.mr uf Ac
n~e ~~ic w m[~ KIP
TfJO M tiRN Q ICD
m
II ~ wfl~ ~
IOG~ ON IqAl~i14100L
I~IK M MS
O 1 1S 1 IID YOtmdlt Q R AT ~ I AN~[ IOIM1
V-J 1 1 ~
1-
~ -1~AC? A
°^ea ~e i ~ ~i i ~ i~ %
La rc
u~ 4 i 4 ~ i i i
I I I 1 ' ` ~ ` ~
---z ~ ,,u,r tim,w ` :
~ . aae rl'~ ~ 1 ~ ~ % 1
~ II
. ~ ~ imLir
i i i i ~ `.`e i 3
SUMMERY~OOD FlRST AODIIII N i ia~e ec
~ ~ Ac
i
~ 2 3 :
u
'
1 1 1 1 I m ~ ~ omiOrAlFm
I i3,= Lr.
0 u 10 ~e0 dt A In~ I i
~me
~ ~ ,
e 'w~o ~l~er,oq,a. w= ar
~ . Mqt fMl N MT m7sM1'
r - unemu ~ ; \ `:•(°fr~r +e;~ : '
• - (OfIRK YOmIOfI 4
p 011M ~.'l17 ~
%
i t . ~ ssqq~ i
• . OON01 IRA MO OIUNAQ LIlCOR ~ w ~ ~e , 1 ` ` ♦ ~
1 ~ ~ ♦ \ ~ ♦ \ ~ 9 ~
1 7 i
Um o r~Awm ra w PLu e Marm Ir cm OWaiat v n[ Maawt 11 ~ ~1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~1 i
d47f ~T MOq M Gf~ t1~ v ~MO[t~ AT M M~T~I O E06 AfL ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ` \ 1 : ~~1 /
11 N
711M IOE7017 10 1!t MT Tw01 1
IfDOEm N Mtl ND Yml[ NL IIG16
0M q d MTf 141Ot Td 16401 Q lOtM[ po4m,m
oounr. ~ 3 • ,,N,~jl' ; %
(D~ ~m 1 ~ ~ • ~ ` ~ ` 1~~ ~
AOWAVOf
110 DJtWN W IOiOIm W A SO'001 R1 701 247 IL ONVAX
~fAdO EDAdI ~7 ~ ~~11~ 101 Me
gffmrim~
1. f[ wiu o ne ll~i e we ean ~1 G • ~
L ns ru o tuer'e' rimn ~ e u,m v,
1
~ ~ ~ i ♦
L - --_____-•t_-__ C~~f--. ~ ~
. 1~
i ~
~ BROOKSIDEiNLLA • ~ i
~ „ 8~~ AO~D ~
, Loc~ at m
9 OF 3 a 1/4 ~t~~c,~oa~t~'t, s~ ty.
, RYWEU. BARREL OR
GENERAL NOTES , cArcw eAsiN wau .
WATERPROOf PIPE (1YP.)
~
1. CRAVEL AAdffILL OUAN111Y COR ORY1VElLS NON-SHRINK
NOTE.
?'fPE *A' - JO CUBIC YAROS AIINIMUM / 42 ?ONS, , CROUT ~
Tl'PE 'A' - 40 CU91C YARDS AIINIMUN / 56 TONS. PYC PIPE ADAPIERS ANO CASKEi ~IA1' VAR1'
OR AS SPEqilEO ON ROAD PLANS. - •----•~--r-• IN SMAPE ANO SIZE AS ILLUSiRA1E0 IN
OETAIL BY ACCEPTABLE ALTEANATE IN
2, SPECIAL BACKFILL MATERUI FOR ORl'riEllS SMAIL CONSIST Oi ACCOROANCE N1TH A,S,i,M,-C-428.
WASMED CRAVEL CRAOEO FROM 1' TO 3' YATH A MAXIMUM OF 57i PASSINC THE U.S. No, 200 SCREEN, AS MEASURED 8Y WEICMi, ASKET
A MAxIUUM OF tOX OF THE ACCRECATE, AS NEASUREO BY wEICHT, ' VC AOAPTER
5 ALL 8E NAN AI,IY OCCURRiNC UNFRACTUREOEMATERIAL90% PVC ADAPTER
3. fABA1C SHALL AE AIOCERAIE SUANYABIUTY AS OUIUNEO • (SAND COLLAR)
IN SIANOARO SPEdFICATIONS 0-33
4. SEE StANDARD PUNS SHEETS 8-2 ANO B-J FOR • i PRECAST CONCREIE OEIAILS, M tA FRAIAE TYPE 1 •
5. AOJUSII,IENT AIOCKS SHALL BE CEMENT C4NCAE?E, PAY UNI15 C~~ TYPE 4~ M~ AR IN PUCE
S. PRECAST RISER MAV BE USED IN COMBINA110N METAL FRAME
M1iH OR IN UEU OF AOJUSIINC BLOCKS, dc GRATE-\-.
• ,
7, M11EN PVC PIPE IS USEO A PVC AQAPTER SMAII BE INSTALLCD. x
I- I'•;.,';
,,.'.:.)y-1.IORTAAEO AO,NSTMENT
• s TOP SOIL !
0, PIPES SMAU, BE CROUTEO INTO QRYWELlS, RINCS
.
' • s.
CAATE TYPE 4T19E 4 i CRAVEL BACKf1ll 2'-0•
~ MORIAR IN PLACE TO 8E COAIPIETEIY
o CovE Eo N11H fAeRlc
INIET PIPE '
10P Shc ~ORTAREO ' ~
C:p Q .
i;~~":rAQJUS111ENT RINCS
CRAVEL eAcKnu
TO BE COMPLETELY
ABAICO N1M ' 2'-0' `r W ~ ';,I jr; SEE N01E 7,
0 COVER
~~C~"e~
INLET PIPE K CRAVEL ;I SEEPACE PORTS,
BACK LL„ SEE OETAII, SMT. 9-2.?
S CEN, '',•I F. ~ <a ~ ~ fAAAIC UNER ;
o~ l 2
, a ACKF ILL.
Q ' N.-SEE OATE 1 ,r
S E D E TACE PpRTT5 z ,ti' i O O O lr:
LSEEPti
II, SM E E B- 2, F A B R I C U N E R
~ ?,I MI , MI . .•if 1~1 I~t
• , .
. ;l;4:., t ;
Sa0IS1UR8E0 QIQISIURBEO
~
, DRYWELL - TYPE 'A' SWALE D YWELL - TYPE '6' SWALE SPOKANE COUNTY APPROVE: 9HEET
STANOARD
DEPARTMENT OF PUBUC WORKS c~~lPdtAqG *A. 1920e 45e•3600 0A PRECAST ORYWELIS PLACEO IN SWALES B'~a
1 r~ ~v i
03l26/02 12:22 FAX CLC Associates. Inc. ~4001/001
~ o a z 41 Y b S POBANE VAI.L,EX P I Rr~- '7in
Q002
l"'\
03/25/02 18:24 FA7[ CLC Aasociates, Inc. Q002
Fire District Approval -
~
Post-it° Fax Note 7671 Date ~Z(p pa9es~ R E C E I VE IJ
To Fram
CaJDeptI~P_ L.. MAR 2 8 2002
Pr'°~ 0 ~O p~'o~ # SPOKANE GOUNTY ENGINEER
FBx ~
F~ # 4-7 7 1
Dat¢: March 25, 2002
To: SPOKANE C'ALJN'tY
Devcaopment Englne+ering Ser+ices Pltoae No, 477-3600
ADivision ofE*ncering 8W Rog& Fax Na. 477-7655
~ro~ao: SPOKANF COtiJNTY
Furc DisfiiCC No, l
10319 E. Sprape Avenue ftone No. 928-2462
Spokane, WA 99206 Fax No. 892-4I25
SpokAne Couaty P_1414-J
Prvject No:
Prnject Name: . Riverwalk 1 I& Addiiion <
5ubject: Fue Disti'ict Appmval
I have re~viewed the majoc road elezuents on the ebave nated project with resgect to geometry
(such as uavel widths and turaing radii)' S'taclas, Uvnn,round9 aud overaH emctgeaty vehicle
, acc.ess, and itad tbern to be aooGptable.
Siacer+ely,
Slgrxmae: ,
O~FflCIAI PUBIlC OOCUMENT
7itle: • SpOKANE COUN'f Y ENGINEERS OFf1CE
~
.
' ORIGINAL
RWEc~ # Wiar
suBMM # ~
RETURN TO COUNTY ENGINEER
03/26/02 T[JB 10:20 [TX/Ri KO 5982l
♦ ' ' , . ' • ' . • . : . , . , . . ` , ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ` ' . ~ • : •Q • , • : ~ 1 ~ , , .
ork".
` • ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ? ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ` • . . ~ • . ~ ♦ ~ ' ~ ♦
~ • ~ N0•~T~~~ES'~. _ • • ~ ~ . • . •
• . • • , • • - ~ - • • _ ~ - I ` ' ~ • , ` ' ~ ~ • '
_ , ut~ or.izatlon. _
. . . . . . . . . . .
70 :A -
. . ~ . .
' ~2214,East~Riyerside , - ~ , . - • ~ ~ • : ~ • _ , : - ' . . -
- . : . , M~R 2-2: •~0~2
Spokane,~Washington 99202.
•(509)"534-9711 • . , , • - - - ' . . . " • . . . - ~ - . ~ . .
' . , . . : . SPOKANE CO1JA~iYEJ~IGl1V~;.
: . _ ~ - .
Please. review'.this, information carefully verify _.the' ~mutual ~understanding, ~and ~~ter.ms of~~ this ,V11ork_ Authorization. '
~ Attachments'applica_61e to this-1lVork Authorization are:checked.. - Provisions of applicable attachments are hereby made a_
part' of this Work Authorization.: Please.retu~n~a signed:original-Wo~k'Authorization to ,ST.I~Northwest:to authoriie the, work
.to begin.
. ~ • ` _ 1 ♦ . , . • • • i ' • • . • • . • ' ~ . .
`1 PROJECT INFORMATION ~ . • ~ ~ ~ . - , ~ . . - ~ ~ : ~ , ' ~ . _ . " ~ : ; ' ~ : • ~ _ . ~ . .
- ~ . - ~ - - . . . . • ~ ~ . - _
'Client Name:.. C&L Development . . - ' - - . ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ - - . • . _Phon~e:. _ (509) 325=4865 , .
. . - , . . ~ . ~ ~ .
Billing ~Address: ' 802'1Nest-Rosewood; Spokane. WashinQton-.99208 ^ ~ . _ • ; ' . : ~ ~ . . . ' : ~ .
, Client's Representative: ' C~aiQ Condron. Phone: (509),325-4865 . .
Representative's Address: - ~ . Same -as above.
_Work Description; ~ . ~ Constr~uction inspection. and -matetials. testinq:
. . : - . - . : ~ ~ _~ti . .
~ . . . ~ . , ~ - . - ~ _ . . ; . - . . - - . .
. ~ . ~ • - ~ . . . - . ~ ~
~Location of Work: Riverwalk 11 Addition ~ : ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ - ~ - . - ~ - . ~ . ~ ~ • .
- Client Will. Provide: Approved plans, permits-and processinQ,.fees.
. . .
~ 2. " ~APPLICABL-E -ATTACHMENT,
:Attachments.which apply to this`V11ork Authorization;-must be~checked~: . ~ ~ - : - : _ ~ . . • ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ - : - ~ .
~ . - . . _ s . . .
DETAIL' ED!DES.CRIPTtON OF*WORK:- SEE ATTAGH~IIIENT."A"N: See.praposal I~tter~dated 02-26-02-1~.
. . • .
~ ~ ~ : . ' I. ~ ~ ~ . . SEE•ATTACHMENT u6"_ ■ _ ~ ~ _ . . , . _ . .
- NOTICE .TO'OWNER:
. ~ • - , . • . _ , _ - . . ; _J . - ~ . ~ : - y : . - , . ~ ~ ~ .
. , . .3. . PROPOSED FEE
. . , . - . - : . . . . . . - - ~ . - . - ~ ~ ~ - - . • . ,
. , ; BASIC SERVI.CES ~FEE: ~$6:540`00-.:
~ 4: EXECUTION OF- WORK ~AUTHORIZATION
_
~ : - The .CLIENT confrms- that h'e :fias:received ~copies-of ~all= applicable: attactiments as:indicated:above ~ind, .all fivepages. ~ - ~
. ~ .
of.this Work Authorization"forrin~_~ndlthat all:~infbrmation~.included;i~_the;Wor-kAuthorFZation.is'tru,e.and'co~rect.~- ~ . • ~ ,
• ; . ; . . ' . . . . , . Y'. `r, . ' • - . : ~.i ' . . . ; ' : . - - ; . ; : • ' ' -
CLIEN ~C&L ~D~eloament ~ ~ _ ~ . . - _ • ' . ~ _ ~ ~ ~ . ~ A . ~ ~ , . ~ ; . _ , -
. , ~ . _ . . . , . . . : . . - , ~ . ~ . . - • . . . . _
. , • - ~ : - . .46
, • - . - ~ ' ~ ENGINEER: STI NO . ST. ~ ~Y' • • l. ' . . ~ • ~ ' : . . - - : . ~ ~ - . - . • ~ ; - " = _ .
Title:. `Assbciate. • . ' ~ -,Da#e:~~
. . . ~By<.~ ; ~ • ~ . - • . ~ ~
Date W:A.'Received~ from CLI ENI : Date W:A. ~ Proposed:: .02-26=02 ~ . ~ : .
- ~ Job Name: - Riverwatk~.1.1'n:Additiorr ' . . - . - . . . . . ~ ~ ~ -J'ob
' . . t • . ' ; , _ , " • . . ' - , , ' 1 . ~ . ~ 'S• , , ' . . . . . , ^ ' , , ~
O~CUtE. PUBUC. DOCUMEhti'
S~POKAi~tE 'C4~JNTY, ENE3lI~ERS'.E?FFlCE'-
• - - ' • ~ ' . • " ~ • • • • _ ` ^ • ` ` , Y • _ S. F : ' mORIG
INA'L~ ~ ~ • ' • ' . .
. , . . . . : : . : ~ ~ . - . ~ - ~ . - _ . P~OJECT - - ~'•144.
' . . , ~ • ~ - ' . . • . - . ' . ` ~ STI. WORK 'AUTHORIZAT[ON - 'SUBMrrrAI. ~ , • I' . . ' • _ . • . ~ . - -
- • ~ . . . . _ • .i ' . ° • . . . < : :.PaGE'1 OF 5~' _ . RG I.uRN T4 COu1V7Y REV. 09/01-
. . . . • ' ' • ' -
E{IlGINEER . . . ~ • '
_ • : - , ; . . ` , . • . - - . . - • - _ . • . • • - • - . • - ' - _ : . .
, ; . , . . . . : , _ , , , . . .
. . ~ ' 1 . ~ • ~ i - ' . . " . . . ' .
` ~ ' • 1 • ' ' ' • ` f • ' f • • , - , ' - • ' ' ' - ' - ' ' r • ' , . _ r . ' • _ . ~ , . . . . ~ . • • ' .
9.: MONTNLY-BILLING PRO.CED1V+ ~'\AND.FORMAT
~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ - l.' ~ - ' • • ' • . , • . ' ~ ~ ~ - _ ' _ ~ . . . .
Th~e.= ENGINEER- will: present the ~CL"IEN7 with ~an~ invoice °each month with. BASIC FEES. atemized- separately from
SPECIAL -SERVICES, FEES-~ and, EXPENSES., Cha~ges',will be itemized ~ by - category of work performed by 'all
employees collectively; -but wiII.NOT. be ~itemiied. showing each employee's billing"rate. and- number of hours worked on.
tfie. project.:-. Information-, detailing. employee.billing_ rates• and ttie. exact number_ of.-hours worked on the CLIENT'S
projeet.will be made avaiJable to the-CLIENT if-requested.'. Charges-for EXPENSES will be-itemized monthly on each
, ' , : :invoice. - : . . : ' - : t . - : ; . ~ . ~ ~ • - ~ - ~ . ~ ~ ; - - . ~ , . ~ .
Monthly,invoices.are-due.,and.payable upon ptesentation-and are-past due 30-_days'following:the invoice-date.- Interest~
~:at- the, rate-of,:1'/.4°a ,per month* will_ be cliarged'on all past due accounts ~with 'interest being calculated -from,the invoice
d~ate.' Inteeest °will be 'compounded' monttily: ' The -CLIENT agrees to -pay all reasonable. attorney's fees and/or•
'collection, costs incur'red :to' collect: past: due amounts:: WORK MAY BE. SIiSPENDED--OtV -,ANY PROJECT THAT
BECOMES 60 DAYS. PAST~DUE.: :WORK WILL NOT RESUME UNTIL THE ACCOUNT IS PAID .TO A CURR~NT
~ . - %'STATUS..
Wiihin. 30 days-after the invoic&date of any invoice sent by the-ENGINEER to the CLIENT pursuant- to this project, the .
CLIENT shall:give wfitten:notice for.any."claimed defciencies, defects; -or lack of-performance with''respect to services .
covered by said invoice;.otherw'ise; -said services shall ~be due according~ to its:terms as an ~account stated. Tiie.
~ purpose ofthis.provision is_to:prOvide-a_ means of~prompt notice'so ttiat the- ENGINEER will not be prejudiced and can
; . act expeditiousfy.to resolve any.claimed'defects, deficiencies,:or tack of performance. . . , . . _ . ~
~ _10: .AUTHORITY° ~ . ~ . - ~ , ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ : - ~ . . : . : • - . - - . . . ' ~ -
~ , . ~ . - ~ - ~ • ~ " ~ . .
In. tlie :case.of conflicts between. the-.WORK AUTHORIZATION-form and.its ATTACHMENTS_ or AMENDMENTS, the
following-.order shall-prevail- with the.higher.docurrient taking precedence over-a document listed underneath. ~ .
. ~ . . . : . - , . ~ ~ ~ .
.A.. AMENQMENT.to-the 1NORK-AUTHORIZATION
.B.. SPECIAL PROVISIONS ~to.tfie WORK'AUTHORIZATION (Attachment "6")
: C. DETAILED DESCR(PTION OF WORK (Atfachment uA")-
ExecutedWORKAUTHORI7ATION form.
11. GENERAL PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS
. . _ . • . . . . . ,
A. . STI NORTI-IWEST, ',her-e'in - referred;to: as.ENGI NEER, agrees to •perform professional~ senrices'as described in this
WORK,-AUTHORIZATION . 1~ncluding applicable attachments for-,the.CLIENT; and,the CLIENT agrees to em`ploy: -
and coriipensate-the~ENGINEER in_accordance witti the terms of the-1'11%ORK AUTHORIZATION.
~ - - B. .During.the:- perfotmanceof°ser.vices; covered *by-_this- WORK. AUTHORIZATION, .the-scope of the._ENGINEER'S
~seniices_ and comPensation, thereon- may be:adjusted -by= mutually agreed; upon-.amendments.. . . : . ~ . - ~ . . ~ . ~ ~
~ ~ -.C~•. ..-T.•h is.WORK AUT.i-IORIZATfON's4all be~ 9-overned, bY, . rtfie~lavirs.of-the 1'arisdiction~.,oflhe, P.. ~oJ'ect:forwhicti•the work-is-..
. . . .
being performed or.when the`re-is=no~project~site;~tfieri~tlie~jutisdiction whereltie work~is•per.formed..
. • - t . , ` ~ , , • . ; : , . . _ . ~ ' . ~ : . ~ i T ~ _ . ' . ~ . A . - . ~ 0 t : , : . • . • ~ . . . ~ ~ • . ,
~D'If, .through ~ no_~'fault "of,,~ ttie: ENGINEER, 'work~ conte'r~'platedundet thef WORK~AUTHORIZATION, ,:extends -longer
~ - tlian~ te:~~months; f~oFri~~ttie -date=of-execution of said.-WORK AUTHORIZATION; the~ un=billed: BASIC: FEE (if
r.
'applicable);, SPECIALr:SERVI,CES-.billing rates; -andlor. expense, -items ~may be,increased, as~~mutually -agreed -for -
:each~year tii~e VNORK AUTHQRIZATION.remains-in.effect*,pasttithe fi~st•:year,-to.:reflect the increased.-cost of doing.-~-
_ business. and/or.changed conditior~s. . ~ . . . _ ~ . ~ . - . . . , _ _ ~ . . . , . . .
. . j: _ . - . . . . . . - ~ . . . - . , • - • 1 - . : • - - - - - . ~ ' • . . . . , • , , ~ ' , . . - . . . . . • : .
~ - . ~:E. ~ Ttiis: WORK•-AUTHOR]ZATION-..imay--be~~ter.minated :bX-th.e,* CLIENT- 'oi.'the;- ENGINEER by giving~; written notice
. ~ ~ . . ~ , seven--daysin .advance-.of 16e- termination-: date; , by-rinutual agreement;. ~or, ~as~.a~ r~esult'.of substaritial failure to ~
perform` in accordanEe~ with the terms ~of .the...WORK .AUTHORIZA~TION` by-the otherY party ~through. no fault :of the- -
, . _ - - . . .
erminatin a ~Ififor. any reason this- WORK'AUTHORIZATI ON is*te~minated,'the ENGINEER shall. be aid foe - ~
. ~ ~ . . . 9 P . , . . . _ . . . . . . . P . . .
the e~ctent of services.performed by him to-the~termir~atior,-date~including reimbufsable-expenses then;due:, : . : ~ •
. . . ~ ~ ~
. ~ F: 'TFie drawing o~iginals;;electronic files,- specificatibris,' reorts;;~and--gerieral. project:files produced in, pursuit :of the .
work'-contemplated: undet this WORK AUTHORIZATIOtV--: stiall. ,remain in: the property. -of the• ENGINEER. The
~CLIENT..shall- be,*erititled ~to -one set.of 'approve& Vueline- prints*; specifications,' repoits, etc:; °applicable to tiis~
particular~ WORK~AUTHORIZATION;. as part of'the- BASIC FEE: Tlie- CLIENT shall be-entitled~ta additional- copies. ~
~and/or second originals of'dravirings; specifications, reports. and:project:fles for- the cosYof handling and
. ' 3 . . ' _ , ~ ; ~ ~ . . , ° . • - ~ . : ~ STI •WORK AUTHORIZATION: ` . . . . ~ : • . - - • ~ '
. ' PAGE *3 OE 5 , ~ , , ' - : ~ : ~ .
: . . . , - . . . - - - . ; . . . ' , ' ' . ~ - . REV. 09/01 ~
, . ~ . - . • • . _ ' . . - . . . • . , - " ~ ~ . .
. . . . - ~ : . . . ~ . . , . , , • - , . - . . . . . . , ~ _ , .
. , . . . . . _ • , . . - - - • • ;
• ' , . . . . . _ . ' : - \ . • • ' _ - . ' ; .
The CLIENT will be respon.-,,ito make-provisions for the ENGINEER',—-. -,kal access to private lands as 'may~be•. required,to perform required services.urider.this WORKAUTHORIZATION. . _ . . . , .
E. Ttie"CLIENT will be responsible for the-preparation and/or legal review of;any contracts or other legaldocurrients :
which may be required.in pursuit of work contemplated by this WORK AUTHORIZATION: -
.F: ,The C.LIENT will'advise :his contractor'of the contractor's responsibility to protect alt suniey. stakes; monuments, markers, and reference points. -The CLIENT orhis contractor shall be responsible to notify the ENGINEER three wor.king days in advance of the requirement. for the placement of construction stakes, as-built-surveys and/or inspections. While it is understood by the ENGINEER and' the CLIENT tfiat situations may arise-where three workirig "days advance notice..may not be practical, the notice provision is established=to aidin the determination of .
whetFier oyertime charges are justified by. the ENGINEER. It is further understood that in ttie cases where proper
_,-notice-is not pr.actical,, the ENGI NEER will make every reasonable effort; iricluding. -over=time hours; - to -
. accommodatethe CLIENT'S sctiedule. 'G: - The CL-IENT virill execute on a timely basis all appropriate documents required pursuant'to. the fulfillment of the -
. , ENGINEER'S and CLIENT'S responsibilities under this WORK AUTHOR1Z4T10N. : . : . H. The'_CLIENT will*provide further information or fees on a timely basis, as required. This information and/or fee •may include, but is-not limited to, the-following: 1. Sewer T.V. fees; . . - _ • 2. - Applicatiori and processing- fees . - • - . . - , • _ - _ , 3.. Agency design review fees 4. -Cost of printing and' mailing documents and reports
-5.. Other fees not specifically discussed elsewhere in this WORK AUTHORIZATION. . -
, I. It shall.be the CLIENT'S'resporisibility to make ar.rangement with appropriate utility companies for the design and
installation of.utilities which'may be.'required to be installed concurrent with street, storm- drainage; sewer, water.or. _-other'facility being designed and/or_inspected by the ENGINEER. Said utilities may include, but are: not, limited. , to,-electrical power service,.telephone.service, cable TV service, or streetlighting:
. J: It is, specifcally vriderstood._that the CLIENT has- not retained - the. ENGINEER as a, construction. manager '
responsible for directing the CLIENT'S contractor and/or scheduling. constructiorr activities.. The CLIENT shalt be' _
. - - ' , responsible to provide his.contractors with current approved plans and specifications. - . . . - . - . , . . . . ' - . - - . . .
' 13_, WORKING'HOURS. -AND OVERTIME
. . • . : - - - . - . - . .
It is understood .that the ENGINEER'S regular working- Fiours for all of~, his.employees.is eight hours, per day and forty-
hours- per•week, 'less paid, holiday-hours which may occur in a particular week., Regular work days are _Monday through ~ Friday;~ : The ENGINEER'S:'es,tablished paid holidays are as.,follows: '.New Year's Day, Memorial Day,. the, Fourth, of.' . . - . . . . ~ • -
, -~July,1abor Day, Thanksgiving, and: Ctiristmas: " . • . - , . . : . , , . ,
When, -at the-discretion. of the. ENGINEER,the~ENGINEER'S office-wide work'load reaches-a level.where more than ~
: . regularworking hours are required:to-accomplish the work on-a timely basis;, and.when-the CLIENT.has.givenprbper_ riotice. of work- to be performed;.-,the-.ENGINEER. may elect to: require•his erriployees to work in'excess;o.f the-regular, . _ , :-working hours and charge for all;work'atthe regular working hour billing rate. - . : r . . : ~ . . , •
, . . : . . . - . - - : . . . • : . . . . - .
-If, however,.the CLI.ENT fails:to give. proper'notice:ofwork to-be performed.or the volume,of work to-be performed is -obviously in ezcess of what',can. be performed during-the regular working hours- available given~.the ENGINEER'S
norrrmal rrrmanpower: level,: thenAhe-.ENGINEER. mayIrequire,.his employees to.work_ in excess of-'th~`.:regular working:
- : . hours and charge~the' CLIENT fot..the 'ezcess hours at an overtime'rate of 1,.5 times the regular-billing rate: _ - _ ' . _ .
It is understood that ttie ENGINEER'S FEE:.forBASIC- SERVICES- an`d the :hourly rates for. SPECIAL SERVICES'is -
~._based on-being able,-to~perform:nearly-all:work proposed in full shifts of eight hours°or, more. Ifi-for reasons- beyond the .
control*of the.ENGINEER-, tii's'employees cannot'perform the"propnsed work substantially.in:eigfit hour shifts•then'.the ENGINEER'S FEE may,be.renegotiated to allow• for oveitime 'pay rates:
" : - . . - , . - : " . . . _ . _ - . , t - . . . . . .
' , : . ' ' - . . STI WORK AUTHORIZATION . • ' - - . . -
' . . • : . _ - ' - _ ' • . . - PAGE 5 OF 5 _ , . • ` - . . : . .
: . . . • . . . . . • . . . . . ' - REV. 49/01- . .
' . ' . . . - - : , . • .
. , • -
~ NORTHV1/EST .
SOILS, TESTING & INSPECTION
February 26, 2002
Mr. Craig Condron
C&L Development, L.L.C.
802 W Rosewood
Spokarie, WA 99208
Re: Proposal for Construction Inspection
Riverwalk 11`h Addition
Spokane County, Washington
Dear Mr. Condron:
As requested, we have prepared this proposal to provide construction inspection services for the
proposed Riverwalk 11 `h Addition in Section 8, T. 25 N., R 45 E., W.M., Spokane County,
Washington. We estimate this project to involve the installation of roughly 375 feet of sewer
line, and the construction of 600 feet of roads along with sidewalks, curbs & gutters and storm
drainage facilities. This proposal summarizes our estimated scope of work and associated costs.
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Our proposed scope of work was developed based on review of plans prepared by CLC
Associates, Inc. dated February 25, 2002. The following sections detail our proposed scope to
address each inspection item.
We will provide construction observation and material testing services as outlined below and
charge for said services on the basis of time and expense.
A. Construction Observation Services:
1. Earthwork and subgrade preparation.
2. Placement and compaction of all base material and pavement.
3. Placement and compaction of sewer and water backfill.
4. Verification of side services and marker posts.
5. Installation of sewer system including observation of air and mandrel testing.
6. Installation of storm drainage items.
7. Erosion control.
8. Coordination with Spokane County.
9. Preparation and submittal of street and drainage record drawings, prepare and
submit sewer record drawings including service cards.
10. Soil and material testing for compaction and backfill for items 1 through 5.
2214 East Riverside Avenue • Spokane, WA 99202 • Phone (509) 534-9711 • Fax (509) 534-9755
A Divtsioo of CLC Associates Inc.
\ \
' I
, Craig Condron
, Rivenvalk 11'b Addition Construction lnspection February 26, 2002
S77 Northwest Page 2
,
B. Direct Expense
Mileage at $0.40 per mile.
Reproduction.
2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK
Construction observation by STI Northwest personnel or other agency personnel shall not relieve
the contractor of his responsibility to construct the facilities covered by this agreement to the line
and grade shown on the approved plans or as staked by the engineer. This contract agreement
does not include construction management or scheduling activities.
1. The scope of these construction engineering services includes:
A) Periodic observation and reporting of specific construction activities on this
project which include sewer installation, storm drainage installation, subgrade,
bases, pavement, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, and material testing;
B) Maintenance of all construction records related to construction activities outlined
in paragraph "A" above, which may include daily inspection reports,
manufacturers' certifications, material test reports, and correspondence;
C) Assurance that the construction of the roads is according to the approved plans
accepted by the Spokane County Engineers, Spokane County General Provisions,
the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction
Manual;
D) Development of post construction Record Drawings for sewer and street facilities;
it is understood the facilities inspected by firms other than STI Northwest will be
certified by those firms in a form acceptable to Spokane County;
E) Coordination of the testing of construction materials for compliance to the plans
accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions,
. Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction
Manual.
2. Prior to acceptance of the road and drainage facilities by Spokane County, we will submit
all construction records and the record drawings to the Spokane County Engineer.
s
, Craig Condron
, Riverwalk 11 `h Addition Construction lnspection February 26, 2002
STl Norchwest Page 3
3. The effort to complete the construction observation and certifications in accordance with
Spokane County requirements varies widely and is closely related to how well your
contractor plans his activities, communicates with our inspection staff, and the quality of
his work. A pre-construction meeting with the contractor, project sponsor, and STI staff
is strongly recommended prior to commencement of any construction activity. This
meeting will be held to determine the schedule, client contact, owners' representative,
and payment responsibility for re-inspection charges for incomplete or inadequate work.
4. Any re-testing required by inadequate work or requests for inspection when the
contractor is not ready will be billed separately as a special service. It is your
responsibility to arrange for any back-billing to the contractor or material supplier.
5. We will coordinate our inspections through you or your general contractor. Any requests
for inspection on work performed by sub-contractors must be forwarded through you or
your general contractor. Unless we are notified otherwise, we will assume that your
general contractor has been given authority to act as the owners' representative and all
field or general communications concerning the construction activities will be directed
through him.
The construction observation and material testing services are billed on a time and expense basis.
A monthly invoice will be prepared and sent to you for these services. The invoice is due within
30 days of the invoice date. The amount of testing necessary is difficult to anticipate, and will
require your contractor and construction manager to coordinate with our inspection department.
We require a 24-hour notice for scheduling construction observation services.
We anticipate our scope of work and approximate costs to be as follows:
~ Sewer installation .....................................................................$1,060.00
~
Storm drainage $370.00
Subgrade ......................................................................................$350.00
Curbs, gutters & sidewalks ..........................................................$640.00
Roadway surfacing ...................................................................$1,200.00
Sewer Record Drawings & service cards .................................$1,120.00
Project certification, street Record Drawings and close-out ....$1.800.00
Total: $6,540.00
The services described herein will be performed as needed and billed on the basis of time and
expense as outlined in the maximum hourly billing rates by job classification included in the
Work Authorization. Our estimated fee of $6,540 will not be exceeded without your
authorization. This cost does not include costs associated with bond reduction requests, drywell
testing or other work not outlined above. If requested, these services will be performed and
billed as a special service.
1 , I
. Craig Condron '
Riverwalk 11 'b Addition Construction Inspection February 26, 2002
ST! Northwest Page 4
It is also understood that no work shall commence within any portion of the proposed Spokane
County Right of Way without first obtaining a written permit and approved plans from the
County Engineer. It is also understood that any project facilities constructed without adequate
construction observation and documentation by STI Northwest will be removed and
reconstructed in accordance with approved project plans and Spokane County Specifications, or
STI will not be responsible for project certification or submission of Record Drawings to the
County Engineer.
REMARKS
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal, and we look forward to serving your
inspection needs. For your convenience, we have submitted two copies of this proposal letter.
Our services can be authorized by having an appropriate representative sign and return one copy
to us. Please understand that the authorizing organization assumes ultimate responsibility for
payment of our services. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not
hesitate to call.
Sincerely, Accepted by,
STI Northwest
/
C-'ti
Bob Graham / (Signature and Date)
Civil Projects Manager
rr
~
F
/
Paul T. Nelsi'~.E. \ (Name and Title)
Associate
j\proposalsVtivenvalk 1 l th inspecNon proposal.doc
, . -
, . ,
WORK AUTHORIZATION
ATTACHMENT "B"
NOTICE TO OWNER OF RIGHT TO CLAIM A LIEN
IMPORTANT: READ BOTH PAGES OF THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY
TO: C&L Development TO: rrai n
Owner AgenUContractor
FROM: STI NORTHWEST
DATE: 02-26-02
PROJECT: Riverwalk 11 th Addition PROJECT
THIS IS NOT A LIEN: This notice is sent to you to tell you who is providing professional
services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of your property and to advise you
of the rights of these persons and your responsibilities. Also take note that laborers on
your project may claim a lien without sending you a notice.
OWNER/OCCUPIER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: Under Washington
law, those who furnish labor, professional services, materials or equipment for the repair,
remodel, or alteration of your owner-occupied principal residence and who are not paid,
have a right to enforce their claim for payment against your property. This claim is known
as a construction lien.
The law limits the amount that a lien claimant can claim against your property. Claims
may only be made against that portion of the contract price you have not yet paid to your
prime contractor as of the time this notice was given to you or three days after this notice
was mailed to you. Review the second page of this notice for more information and ways
to avoid lien claims.
COMMERCIAL AND/OR NEW RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: We have or will be
providing professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of your
commercial or new residential project. I n the event you or your contractor fail to pay us,
we may file a lien against your property. A lien may be claimed for all professional services, materials or equipment furnished after a date that is sixty days before this notice
was given to you or mailed to you, unless the improvement to your property is the
construction of a new single-family residence, then ten days before this notice was given
to you or mailed to you.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON NEXT PAGE
STI ATTACHMENT B
PAGE 1 OF 2
. ' .
• " •
SENDER: STI NORTHWEST
ADDRESS: 2214 East Riverside
SPOKANE, WA 99202
TELEPHONE: (509) 534-9711
Brief description of professional services, materials, or equipment provided or to be
provided: Professional engineering and related services.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR YOUR PROTECTION: This notice is sent to inform
you that we have or will provide professional services, materials or equipment for the
improvement of your property. We expect to be paid by the person who ordered our
services, but if we are not paid, we have the right to enforce our claim by filing a
construction lien against your property.
LEARN more about the lien laws and the meaning of this notice by discussing them with
your contractor, suppliers, Department of Labor and Industries, the firm sending you this
notice, your lender, or your attorney.
COMMON METHODS TO AVOID CONSTRUCTION LIENS: There are several methods
available to protect your property from construction liens. The following are finro of the
more commonly used methods.
DUAL PAYCHECK (Joint Checks): When paying your contractor for services or
_ materials, you may make checks payable to the contractor and the firms furnishing you
this notice.
LIEN RELEASES: You may require your contractor to provide lien releases signed by all
the suppliers and subcontractors from whom you have received this notice. If they cannot
obtain lien releases because you have not paid them, you may use the dual payee check
method to protect yourself.
YOU SHOULD TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY FROM
LIENS.
YOUR PRIME CONTRACTOR AND YOUR CONSTRUCTION LENDER ARE
REQUIRED BY LAW TO GIVE YOU WRITTEN INFORMATION ABOUT LIEN CLAIMS.
IF YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED IT, ASK THEM FOR IT.
STI ATTACHMENT B
PAGE 2 OF 2
' „ ~ ~ , ~ ' ~ ~ • . , ' . . ~ • • • .
~ ~ , • ~ • ~ . ~~ii'~ . ' ~ ' ' ' ,
, I ~ ' ' ' • ' , ' ~
• ' . . . ~ , ' ~ '7~~j
' . ' ' ~ . . . . . ~ . . . • ' ' ' Li~
ROkD , ROAD ,
:y
EASEMENT ~ EASEMENT ~
uMITS 35' ROAD EASENiENT LIMITS ~
rF ~
SIDEWALK & U'i ILIT1' ~ C/L ' UTILITY
EASEMENT 17,5 ~ i i 17,5 ' EASEMENT
; 16' ~ 10'
. . .
i a' 15.5' PAVED WIDTH ~ 15.5' PAVED WIDTH 2
j.. t
,50 5~ . .
M-IN. MIN.
I - 0.0200 F7./FT. . ~ 0.0200 Fr,/Fr.
N44
~ ~,'1
~ sioEwALK
. ~ (ONE SIDE ONLY) .
SPCXANE COUNTY
2" -COMPACTED CLASS "B" ASP'HALr CONCRETE C0NTA!NING n'P~ "R" CURB
' S 3/417o Tt0 6 1/4%, ASPHALT ON y' COMPACTEa CRUSh-EO ,
SUR-FACtNG BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. ~
1.YPICAL CROSS00 -SECT10N
MICHIELU 1.ANE (NOT To ScALE)
RIVERWALK IANE ~ . ~
SHANNON IANE RECEIVED ~ voaJw
~
~ oMcK PUSuG DoCUmtt ~5 .
. sPoKuuE couNnr ~INEEFtg oM ~ MAR 2 22002
ORIGINAL ~ sPOKwE couhmENGINEER . .
PAOJECT # P 1414.T ,
SUBMInAI # 1 ~
~ ~ RETI!hN TO COUMY ENGINEER
, , , i ~ , , , r• ~ ~
. . . ' , , . , .7'
, 1 ' • ' , . ~ ~ ' .
. . . , . . S~ . . . .
. . , .
~ ~ . . . _ . . ~ - . . _ . _ . .
35' PRIVATE RpAD EASEMENT
17.5' 17,5
Y ~ .
21 15.5' PAVED WI4TH 1565' PAVED WIDTH ' 6►
a...i a, •,a .
SPO. C0. Sl'a.
TYPE "R" CUR6 ~
~ j (ROLL,ED CURB)
2% 2% 2% , . . ~ ~
2" CLAS5 "B" ASAHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING RECEIVED
5, 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPtiALT ON 7" CRUSHEO 6' W1DE SIDEWALK LOCATED ON
ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE NTH WSOOT MAR 2 2?~o~ ONE SIDE OF STREET. SEE
SPECIFICATIONS. STREET PLANS FaR LOCATION.
OFFIClAL PUB1dC I~~ SPOKANE GOUNiY ENGINEER '
TYP CAL PR VATE ROAD SECTr*AKANE
NOT TQ SCALE
PRWECt # e 1414J
SUsM(TTAI.
RETURN TO,,CQIf MY ENGENEER '
. _ . , . . . . .«~:a;
.~..~.:.~~ca~.,. ~,.~...r.....e,~.,v~.~ . , . . 4'• ~:~ic4k:~.V~a>>,,.
. 9 ~J~ • \ , .
. ;
. .
.
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DIVISION OF fiNGINEERING AND ROADS • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
r
Apri12, 2002 John Saywers, P.E. COP,
CLC Associates, Inc. .
707 W. 7`h Avenue, Suite 200 .
Spokane, WA 99204
Subject: P1414J Riverwalk 11 Addition • ~
Road and Drainage Submittal #1 Su~ ~11~~ ~
Dear John, We reviewed your March 22, 2002 submittal of the design dacumeats for this project. The following
items need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: ~ . -
e. e p a tio-
. Plemete OK... .
e~a~ l,
. Please provide a detail for the "heavy-duty sidewallc" specified in Detail6 on Sheet 4.
~ The length "L" needs to be specified for all type 1 curb inlets (Standard Plan B-8).
~ The note on the bottom, right side of Sheet 4 needs to specify that soil tests are required for aIl of
the ponds. ~ Standard note number 7 from Appendix B of the Guidelines for Stormwater Management needs
to be added to the plans.
~ Please verify that the text and the attachments i.n the Operation & Maintenance Manual have been
updated to correspond to this project. The submitted attachments are for the Swnmerwood
Second Addition project.
villo, Please provide documentation that a reciprocal agreement has been established that gives lot
owners permission to access the private roads adjacent to this plat and other plats, as necessary, in
order to access the public roadway system. ~ ~ A draft of the homeowners association CC&Rs needs to be submitted to our department for
review. • Nee,d io rePer. 1-tV~ o~ M rnar uaL, .
i
1026 W, Broadway Ave. o Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600=' FAX:,(509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) s%i-7478 (3rd Floor), ;,";r:% 4"7-7133
. • -
r
~
PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST
PROJECT REVIEW ~ DATE: 3 f a1.? /.U0 3.,.
.
PROJECT NAME: ~V e N' 1~~ tlth A C~ C~ 1 t l0 C1r-
PROJECT ENGINEER: 316If1 fy S a~ vy e r s 4 S uS w'L Mur ?hy
PROJECT APPLICANT: C YO4,. Go nd ro n.
COUNTY REVIEWER: Gin
~ ~XwN"
COUNTY STANDARDS (circle one): 1981 1995 (=9 9) 2001
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
YesSCON/A❑ 1. A signed fee agreement is in the file.
YeslifNo❑ in❑ 2. A completed Submittal Checklist has been included with the road and drainage plan submittal.
Ycs❑NoLLN/A❑ 3.
~
vCsivo0wn❑ 4. The plat lies outside designated 100-year Flood Plain Area. CSetb&a~-eoen. h~gh watAr mar k:)
veSIOr,ZIrun❑ 5. The project is located outside of an identified Storinwater Management Problem Area.
ves[]rro❑N/Ag 6. Any design deviations are approved.
YeSrro❑rr/n❑ 7. Locate the Findings and Order for the project and read the Conditions.
veS❑rro11N/n52( 8. A signed Project Agreement was submitted with the plans and report (for 2001 Road Standards).
YesdNoON/A❑ 9. Copy road design element table from Pre-design Meeting Notes and attach.
ves0NoON/A❑ 10. A site visit was performed. Date:
PLAN REQUIREMENTS
vesivo❑N/A❑ 1. First plan sheet has a project title, a vicinity map, an index of plan sheets and the engineer's certification statement.
ves o❑N/A❑ 2. The plans are signed by the developer.
vesNo❑ra/n❑ 3. The plans are stfunped, signed and dated by a Washington P.E.
vANo❑N/A❑ 4. Road alignment includes 100 ft stationing; stations increase west to east and south to north; station equations shown.
vesRrvo❑N/n❑ 5. Section, Township and Range are provided.
YesdnoON/A❑ 6. Bearings on the road centerline are provided.
YesdNo❑N/A❑ 7. Curve data (radius, delta, arc length and semi-tangent) is shown for all road centerlines and curb retums.
Yes❑xo❑N/A[Sd 8. Existing utilities are shown on the plans.
YeANoON/n❑ 9. Proposed utilities are shown on the plans.
YeggNo❑N/A❑ 10. Intersecting and adjacent roads are identified and shown, as are any adjacent subdivisions.
ves[Yrro❑N/A❑ 11. North an-ow and scale (min linch = 50 ft; = 100 ft OK for large lots; = 20 ft for cluttered plan) are shown.
vestoNoll/a❑ 12. A benchmark is called out on the plans.
ves9No❑N/A❑ 13. Title Block to include: project name, sheet number, road name and road limits (by station).
ves9No❑N/A❑ 14. Section and lot lines are shown on the plans.
YesRfivo[1vra❑ 15. The Standard Plan Notes are included on the plans. e ~~1 tiX
YesdNoON/n❑ 16. Existing and finish contours are shown on road pl .
ENG All Fornvs & ProgramslPlan Review Checklist.doc Page 1 of 8
Revised: 02/28/02
• • -
. ~
'
YesANoON/A❑ NEW STREETS
ves[YrroON/A❑ 1. The plans show a typical road cross-section. (MoOmh exis-t'itl9 - 5e+e SubmiE{M CI^OLS• j~ect'10Y15D
ves5fNo❑rrIA11 a. If yes, cross-section shows: Existing R/W, proposed R/W, proposed width, futwe setaside, edge of new pavement,
curbs, sidewalks, and any other required improvements.
veANoON/A❑ b. If yes, cross-section on the plans shows the cross slope between 2% to 4.5%.
vC3divo❑N/A❑ c. If yes, the cross-slope is correct when checked on the profile drawings.
v~~ o~N/A❑ 2. The proposed street width malches the Findings and Order. Cp►or6 ~hq* ~i~ ~r prtY~'2 ~'ond ba.tat,t5~~
v~LrJNo❑N/A❑ 3. Centerline slopes are within minimum and maximum.
vCSivo❑N/A❑ 4. Vertical curve lengths are adequate (use spreadsheet). ~
vesrroOrrIA❑ 5. Horizontal curve radius values are adequate. -
ves3dNoON/A❑ 6. The curb type is TyPe B for public roads and Type R for private. ~
ve8gxo0N/A❑ 7. The curb grades are z 0.5%.
Yes❑rro❑wad a. If no, there is an approved design deviation in the file.
Yfs❑no❑wnCY 8. Soil borings have been taken and soil has been classified as per USC system. rlla1'Ck1 ~x~s'h nq
vCs❑No❑N/A a. County matrix in Road Standards was utilized for pavement section design.
Yes❑NoaN/AY b. Pavement design method and proposed section(s) are adequate.
Ycs❑NoON/A CUR.B RETURNS
Yes❑xo11N./a❑ 1. BCR, MCR, and ECR stations/elevations on curb returns are shown in the plan view.
vea ❑ No ❑N/A ❑ 2. Curb return radius values are adequate.
vGg❑rrollinfli INTERSECTIONS
vCS❑r►o❑v/n❑ 1. Intersection separation is z 150' on local access streets and 300' on arterials.
vesONo❑Nva❑ 2. The intersections meet the landing rEquirements (2% 1995 Stds; 2% downgrade/4% upgrade 1999/2001 Stds).
Yes❑No❑N/n❑ 3. Wheelchair ramps are provided at intersections with sidewalks.
ves❑No❑N/n❑ 4. Sight distance is addressed for each intersection; analysis (plan and profile) is provided where appropriate.
Ycs❑No❑N/A52( CULrDE-SACS
vcs[]r,o❑NJA❑ 1. The center of cul-de-sac station is shown.
ve30NoOruA❑ 2. The cul-de-sac curb is shown in profile.
veS❑rrXIrrrA❑ 3. The cul-de-sac radius is 45'/50' diameter.
YeSOrrol]N,n❑ 4. The cul-de-sac grades (top of curb) are 1% mini.mum.
Yes❑rro❑N/AL14 TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE PLAN
vesOrroON/A❑ 1. Street name signs are shown at all intersections.
ves❑No❑N/A❑ 2. Stop signs are shown for all streets that intersect an arterial.
vesOrro❑N/A❑ 3. Bamers are shown at the end of dead end streets (when necessary).
,res❑No[]NiA❑ 4. Special signing issues are addressed. (Check with the County Traffc Engineer).
vesoNo❑N/M CHANNELIZATION PLAN
ENG All Forms & Progams/Plan Rcview Checklist.doc Page 2 of 8
Revised: 02/28/02
• cl,' ~ J
veSor,oON/n❑ 1. A striping and/or channelization plan has been submitted.
YesONoOrrin❑ 2. Channelization Plan has been reviewed and OK'd by Bob Brueggeman in Traffic Engineering.
Yes❑NoONlA STREET WIDENING
vesOrro❑ruA❑ 1. A street cross-section is shown for widening existing streets.
ve:ONoOrrrn❑ 2. Cross-section shows: existing R/W, proposed R/W, future set-aside, and edge of existing and proposed pavement.
Yes❑No❑N/A❑ 3. The proposed new width matches the width required in the Conditions.
Ves❑xoOn/n❑ 4. The curb type is Type B for public roads and Type R for private.
Yes❑YoON/A❑ 5. Cwb section cross slope is between 2% and 4.5%.
veSONo❑N/A❑ 6. Curb grades are z 0.5%.
vesONaOr,/A❑ 7. Length of pavement taper out of project = WS2=60 for 40 mph; WS for > 45 mph.
Yes❑NXIwn❑ 8. Transition from end of cwb to elcisting paving is shown (curb should nose down in 12").
veSOr,a❑rrin❑ 9. 100' (min.) pavement taper into project is shown. (consider R/W)
veS❑rro0rr/n❑ 10. Widening spreadsheet has been provided; new cross-slopes and gutter grade are appropriate.
Ycs❑No❑YlAd DITCHES
ves0rro❑h,in0 1. llitches are identified in plans, details provided, and have a minimum grade of 0.5%.
ves❑No❑rrrn❑ 2. Profiles and cross-sections are shown on the plans for all proposed channels and ditches.
YesONo❑Nrn❑ 3. Ditches with eroding velocities have lining for erosion protection.
vesLlOxo❑NrA❑ CULVERTS AND PIPE SYSTEMS
vesiorro❑N/A❑ 1. All culverts and pipes are shown in profile (types, stations, offsets, lengths, and inverts).
vesLgNo❑N/n❑ 2. All pipes are _ 12"; 10" is allowed between catch basins or drywells, if the length S 44 LF and velocity 4 fps.
Yesrro0wa❑ 3. The minimum culvert and pipe slope shown is 0.5%.
Yes~~vo❑n+in❑ 4. There is >12" of cover for all culverts / storm sewer pipes. {2.5' (PVC), 1.5 (CMP), I'(RCP) (HDPE/ADS)}
vANo❑Nin❑ 5. The culverts aze stationed from centerline stationing.
ves❑No❑N/A&f 6. Pipe anchors are shown for pipe grades >20%.
vesONoON/AlSf 7. Energy dissipation is provided (i.e. riprap around culvert oudet).
ves❑ro11N/Ad 8. All angle points in the pipe system have suitable access such as a catchbasin, cleanout or manhole for cleaning.
Y,,ONo[]N/A%r 9. All pipes fu-e located a minimum of 5 feet from a rear or side property Line.
YcsLLINo❑N/A❑ INLETS
ves0Na❑N/A❑ 1. The centerline road stations, offsets, and invert elevations for all inlets are shown in the plan views.
vesdNo❑N/A19 2. Inlet grate type is shown.
vAL0ww❑ 3. Catch basin, inlet, or special manhole details are shown or a standard drawing is referenced.
vesdNo❑N/A❑ 208 SWALE & DRYWELL SYSTEMS
vesdrro❑wA❑ I. The swale is located outside a future set aside area.
vesmrro❑N/A❑ 2. Swale floor elevation is shown on the drawing.
YesUivo❑N/A❑ 3. Dimensions are shown for bottom of swale.
Yesrro❑N/A❑ 4. Swale floor is 6" below drywell grate elevation (8" if soil mixture is specified or CEC testing requirement is noted).
veS9xo❑N/A❑ 5. Sod/turf/hydroseed and sprinkler system is specified for publicly maintained ponds.
ENG All Forms & ProgAms/Plan Review Checklisl.doc Page 3 of 8
Revised: 02/28/02
vesoNo❑rvARf 7. Dryland grasses specified far ponds maintained by homeowner's associations.
YesL70NoON/A❑ 8. Swale side slopes do not exceed a 3:1 side slope. (2:1 side slope is allowed if swale depth is <12")
vesivo❑rr/n❑ 9. Swale floor > 6" below nonnal gutter flowline at curb inlet without drywell; > 10" with drywell.
YeaEgNo❑N/A❑ 10. Swale must have 3" freeboard above the max. water surface elevation for the design storm.
veS19ivo❑NfA❑ 11. A cross-section of the pond is shown.
Yeadivo❑N/A❑ 12. A grading plan has been provided for the pond; at a minunum, finisb contours have been provided.
ves[]No❑NlAg 13. A 6 ft visible through fence is provided if the swale is > 1' deep, sideslopes exceed 5:1 and cannot drain in 72 hrs.
vesgNo❑x/n❑ 14. Overflow from a swale at a low point is directed away from structures.
vMNfNa❑nin❑ 15. Drywell type is speeified.
vCS[9No❑N/A❑ 16. Drywell grate type is specified.
vesgNo❑rr/n❑ 17. Dmvell should be offset from the curb inlet.
Yca❑xo❑N/A1Rf 18. Muldple drywells are located more than 30' apart, center to center.
YAivoOwA❑ 19. Drywell is located within 8' of the curb line, or a maintenance access route and easement are provided.
ve8❑NoONin5d20. A 12' maintenance access drive to the bottom of pond is provided, if necessary.
Yes❑No❑N/a►~ a. If yes, an all-weather surface (6 in gravel), min 12 ft. wide, min 20 ft. easement or tract, with < 20% slope.
vesLlOro❑NIn❑ 21. Bottom of drywell has a 4 ft rninunum clearance from any limiting layer (ie, bedrock, clay, or high groundwater).
vC:0No0rr/n9 DETENTION POND
Yes❑NoOrrIn❑ 1. The pond bottom bottom elevation is shown on the drawing.
veS❑rro❑rr/n❑ 2. Dimensions are shown for the pond bottom.
Yes❑rro❑K/a❑ 3. Sod/turf/hydroseed and sprinkler system is specified for publicly maintained ponds.
vesorroll,'/n❑ 4. Dryland grasses specified for ponds maintained by homeowner's associations.
YeSOrrXINiA❑ 5. Pond side slopes do not exceed a 3:1.
YeS❑rro❑Ma❑ 6. A cross-section of the pond is shown.
vesONo❑Nrn❑ 7. A grading plan has been provided for the pond; at a minimum, finish contours have been provided.
vesCINoON,n❑ 8. A 12' maintenance access drive to the bottom of pond is provided, if necessary.
ve:ONo❑NJA❑ a. If yes, an all-weather surface (6 in gravel), min 12 ft. wide, min 20 ft. easement or tract, with < 20% slope.
vesONo❑N/A❑ 9. A 6 ft visible through fence is provided if the swale is > 1' deep and sideslopes exceed 5:1 and cannot drain in 72 hours.
ves[]No❑N/A❑ 10. Berm height is greater than 4 ft in height.
YesOr,o❑N!A❑ If yes, design includes a keyway, clay or geotextile liner and is in accordance with Fig 47 of SW Guidelines.
v.ONo❑rr/n❑ 11. Berm height is greater than 12 ft in height.
ves[]No❑N/A❑ a. If yes, geotechnical report and subsurface investigation has been prepared and submitted for review.
v«otvo❑ruaN( EVAPORATIVE POND
ves❑No❑N/n❑ l. A cross-section of the evaporative pond is shown.
ves❑rro❑wA❑ 2. A grading plan has been provided for the pond; at a minimum, finish contours have been provided.
ves[]rro❑rr/A❑ 3. Sod/tw-f/hydroseed and sprinl:ler system is spccified for publicly maintained ponds.
veS❑r,o❑N/A❑ 4. Impermeable liner of compacted clay, bentonite soil mix, or plastic, with seepage rate < 1 x10-1 cm/s.
Yes❑r,o❑N/a❑ 5. Dryland grasses specified for ponds maintained by homeowner's associations.
veS❑xo0N/A❑ 6. Berm heigtit is greater than 4 ft in height.
Yes❑rvo❑N/A❑ If yes, design includes a keyway, clay or geotextile liner and is in accordance with Fig 47 of SW Guidelines.
ves[]xo❑N/n❑ 7. Berm height is greater than 12 ft in height-
Yes❑No❑N/n❑ a. If yes, geotechnical report and subsurface investigation has been prepared and submitted for review.
ENG All Fonns & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 4 of 8
Revised: 02/28/02
Yes❑Na❑N!A❑ 8. A 12' maintenance Access drive to the bottom of ponds is provided, if necessary.
ves❑NoON/A❑ a. If yes, an all-weather surface (6 in gravel), min 12 ft. wide, min 20 ft. easement or tract, with < 20% slope.
ves❑NoON/A❑ 9. A 6 ft visible through fence is provided if the swale is > l' deep and sideslopes exceed 5:1.
vesivo❑N/A❑ EASEMENTS
YesOrro❑N/A01 1. All drainage ditches have adequale drainage easements for maintenance.
Ye:[]rro❑Ninm 2. All slorm sewer pipes have adequate easements for maintenance.
veS❑tioONin9 3. There are existing or proposed easements for natural channels.
Yes❑roON/Alif 4. Easements for natural channels are adequate to pass the 50-year storm plus a 30%.
Ves❑No❑N/Ag 5. A public drainage easement is provided where public street drainage is divertecl onto private property.
YeaONo❑NiAA 6. OverIIow easements are provided from swales/ponds locatcd in low points, where necessary and possible.
YesOrro❑N/Afi~ 7. Sight distance easements are identified.
ve:dNo❑N/A❑ 8. Easements for 208 swales are shown on the drainage plans.
YesffNo❑rria❑ EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
ve&P o❑•r~a❑ 1. The basic elements are on the plan (silt fence, rock construction entry, checkdams, etc.).
vasll~rro❑wA❑ 2. Standard Notes have been included
REPORT REQUIREMENTS
vesLlONo❑N1A❑ 1. The calculations are stamped, signed and dated by a Washington P.E.
Yes5fM❑r,/a❑ 2. A SCS soils map is included.
veslYNo❑N/A❑ 3. The perpetual maintenance of drainage systems is provided for.
veS❑No❑wng 4. The pre-developed CN value matches the recent land use (pasture/range = grazed by livestock; agriculture = farmed).
YG.dNoON,,,❑ Roans
veSRivo❑rrin❑ 1. Gutter flow depth and non-flooded road width evaluated for compliance (see GSM Figure 37).
YeS❑rro❑NlAA 2. A site distance analysis has been provided for each intersection.
ves❑rro❑NInCY a. A sight distance easement has been provided for eneroachment >2 ft.
YesKINo❑N/A❑ BASEq MAPS
ves0No0NinNf 1. A pre-developed basin map is provided.
Yes~ oON/A❑ 2. A post-developed basin map is provided.
YesLlOn~o❑N/A❑ 3. North arrow and scale are shown.
YesVNo❑N/A❑ 4. Sub-basins are labeled and correlate with calculations.
veARNoON/A❑ 5. Contours/spot elevations are shown.
YesLnNo❑N/A❑ 6. Tc routes are shown.
veSOrro❑HiA&r 7. Existing drainage courses are shown.
veS❑ ❑r,raN 8. Proposed drainage courses are shown.
v~.~DONo❑Nla❑ 9. The drainage design maintains eacisting sheet flow patterns without concentrating Qows.
ENG All Fortns 8c ProgramslPlan Review Checklist.doc Page 5 of 8
f2evised: 02/28/02
C~f
YesfidNo❑N/A❑ BA►S'IN►S
YesffNo❑N/A❑ 1. I-Iydrologic calculations are provided for each basin. (Rational Formula if 10 acres, SCS TR-55 if area> 10 acres).
vC:RfNa0N/n❑ 2. On-site = 10 year design storm and off site = 50 year design storm.
veAL❑Nin❑ 3. Runoff rate is compared between entue basin and road area;.larger rate controls.
vCSOrro❑NIn00 DITCHES
ves0No0N/n❑ l. Ditch calculations have been provided (50 year storm, plus 30% freeboard).
YesPIxo❑zvA❑ CULVERTS AND PIPE SYSTEMS
YesYNo❑N/A❑ 1. Backwater analysis for any pipe and/or ditch is included.
vesRfNo11rrrn0 2. Headwater calculations for culverts are provided.
vesdNo❑N/A❑ 3. The headwater for culvert entrances is under 2~ for <18" in ~ and 1.5 ~ for culverts greater than 18" in
vesRfrro0rvin❑ 4. The minunum velocity within each pipe of the pipe system is 4 fps.
vcAgNo❑N/A❑ 5. There is a minimum freeboard of 0.75 feet in each catchbasin and manhole.
ves13No❑N/AV( 6. Riprap design calculations are provided.
YesNfNoON/A❑ INLETS
ves~ o❑wA❑ 1. Curb inlet capacity calculations are included.
v~~o0 rrra❑ 2. Perimeter calculation does not include the side of the grate against the curb face.
YesLrJ~voONlA❑ 3. Perimeter of grate is = 2 for calculations where there is no curb opening.
YesRIlvo❑N/A❑ 208 SWALE & DRYWELL SYSTEMS
vCS1ffNo❑run❑ 1. Soils type is "pre-approved" for drywells without percolation tests (see page 4-15, GSK.
Yes❑No❑N/Asf a. If no, a geotechnical report is included and recommendations are accounted for.
ve s~rroOKin❑ 2. Swale area is z required area from `208' calculations for impervious areas.
Yes~xo11~riA❑ 3. 208 swale floor area, volume requirements sized properly to treat impenrious surface areas.
ves0No❑wnMe DETENTION POND
ves❑r,oON/a❑ 1. Contains 50-yr developed.
vesOrvoON/n❑ 2. Releases at 50-yr pre-developed.
vesONaOr„n❑ 3. Control structure is designed to release rates specified in the Conditions.
ves❑No❑r„n❑ 4. Downstream channel or pipe system can handle proposed flows.
YesONoON/n❑ 5. Emergency overflow weir for 100-year post-developed flow rate.
veS0,va❑N/A❑ 6. Sump prior to outlet to control structure.
veS❑No❑rua►❑ 7. 1' min. freeboard at 50-year design storm is provided.
veSONo❑N/A❑ 8. SCS method used in routing analysis for detention pond sizing.
veSOr,XIrr/n❑ a. If yes, basins with CN values that differ by 20 points or more have been evaluated separately, and then added.
veSOr,o❑N!A❑ 9. Qpost < Qpre
ves❑No❑N/A❑ 10. Vpost Vpre, if in Conditioas or deemed necessary due decision of County Engineer.
Yes❑No❑N/Ad EVAPORATIVE POND
ENG AU Forms & Prograin4/Plan Review Checklisl.doc Page 6 of 8
Revised: 02/28/02
~ •
-
vesONo❑NIn❑ 1. "Condition A" - no surface discharge: hold all post-developed volume; begin 2 yr cycle with 100 yr storm in pond.
Yes❑rroON/n❑ 2. "Condition - existing surface discharge: post minus pre-development volume, witti 1.2 safety factor; 2 yr cycle.
ves❑rvo❑wn❑ a. If yes, in addition, a separate detention storage system is provided to attenuate peak flows during desigu events.
YesOr,o❑NvA❑ 3. ]aetention system is designed in accordance with SW Guidelines (see checklist above).
ves❑NoON,n❑ 4. Water budget cycle iterations have been provided: starting at several different months (typically Oct through Feb).
ves❑Noc]N/A❑ a. If yes, the month that nets the greatest overall (total at end of cycle) storage volume is used for final design.
YeSONoOrr/A❑ 5. Average annual precipitation rate has been adjusted for location (Fig 29).
vesEIrro❑rrIn❑ 6. Runoffvolumes are determined by the SCS hycirograph method.
Yes❑No❑N/A❑ a. If yes, runoffvolumes have calculated sepazately for permeable and impervious area, and then added together.
VesEIrro0rr/n0 b. If yes, antecedent moisture conditions have been taken into account for frozen and saturated ground conditions.
Yes❑no❑wn❑ 7. Investigation and discussion has been included that addresses the potential for mounding, downstream impacts, etc.
VesL10No❑N/A❑ 208 LOT PLANS CHECKLIST
vesLbNo❑N/A❑ 1. Lot plans are on 8'/2" x 11 " paper size. 04:)
vesYxo❑wA❑ 2. The lot number, block number, subdivision name, date drawn, scale, north arrow and street name.
ves❑ oOruA❑ 3. Easement dunensions are in relation to property lines or comers.
Y~~o11nIA❑ 4. Location of curb and sidewalk (or edge of asphalt) are shown.
vesLrJro❑N/A❑ 5. Setback requirements indicated.
YeR(•o❑N/A❑ 6. Swale floor elevation shown.
YeslJNo❑N/A❑ 7. Swale floor dimensions are in relation to property lines or corners.
veS❑rvXIn/A❑ 8. Rim elevation drywell type, frame and grate type, centerline offset and station fu-e shown.
vC:❑No❑N/Afi~ 9. Any drainage ditches, or other related easements are shown.
veslyr o0x/A❑ 10. Depth from the nomnal flowline to bottom of swale is indicated.
vesLrJrroOn/n❑ 11. Existing easements, buildings, future set asides, and required building setback lines are shown.
Yes NoO./n❑ 12. A cross section of the drainage facilities (ie, swale, drywell, catch basin, ditch) is on a second sheet.
Yes No❑N/n❑ 13. The cross section shows the concrete apron, R.O.W. line, and specifies sod or seed mix.
veSNfNo❑N/n❑ 14. A P.E. stamped all pages of the Lot Plans
UNIQUE DESIGN ELEMENTS
Yes❑NoOwad UNDERGROUND GRAVEL GALLERIES
ves❑r,o❑N/A❑ 1. The site is suitable for underground gravel galleries based on the site screening criteria in the standards.
ves❑xXN/A❑ 2. .3 void ratio for gravel free space voltune is used or test infonnation is provided to justify ratio used.
veS❑r,o❑N/A❑ 3. Perc rate from field test is used to develop outflow rate
ves[]rro❑N/A❑ 4. 10-yr event volume is contained entirely underground
ves❑No❑N/A❑ S. 100-yr event volume is contained by a combination of underground storage and above ground storage up to 8" depth
vesONo❑N/A❑ 6. Soil mixtw-e is specified for water depth in pond exceeding 8".
ve.s❑rro❑N/A❑ 7. Entire gallery is wrapped in filter fabric.
Yes❑rro❑N/A❑ 8. Adequate freeboard is provided in any aboveground storage pond.
ENG All Forms & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 7 of 8
Revised: 02/28/02
o •
• l/ ~,1
~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
EG4V3 Traf~fic anaj~ at Q4c_ha (olci cohdt•hons~ cheu< w Ls-tcve
New GoMi-6orlS
~
NOTES
/Oachnnen 'tri, ~ "anua~ am Fror a dtfferp.r►"royct
• ~ Tam2d tc Su~- ~
oor't need"C'ecord dr~rt qprftL' ovA ia►na-kur't block.. C.~ 4L-u%m hAmavt •
Vtleed a de'tvi%L * i-he he4vv dufv StdPWAIk. Shat y, deottl. 6~
v L11eeA~~e s~c,t,~teow curb intet
✓ Note. on 4►~e~ t4 n+eeds -h sVca% jAil &t S0tL-jes1nL-arQ rtattre.d--ar aiLfonck,
V'No drv wetl 'in lPond e. .
on p~aanz ~
~ Y
.
~ etd 3`` above max. 4va~X ~r~ FaCe el eY A.i1o n~ jn 5w aLe w I o dr y vYeil ~~eety~deyall
. ~
~o.k. -to use a►,d~►aCent Secttion citstaW o~ over -7"
v
' tAurb tnlGts o K.
-IT ENG All Fotms & Progams/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 8 of 8
Revised: 02/28/02
, . . • • .
, • ~y--~ • , '
Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 2
Spokane County Pub]ic Works . •
Road Plans
1. Road Classifications and Desipn Criteria. ,
~ #1 #2 #3#4 ~
~
Street Name gi Vef h/Rlk Ltl 5hPuNDILAi .
Classification i~21 VA TIE~
- -
Roadway Width, W ZIf ~ .
' 129vU bsNt%r. -pP_LU, G&Wr .
Minimum right-of-way , .
wldth
see note'(1) , N/pr
- - ,
~ Min. Horiz. Curve w/ super . ,
~ Min. Horiz. Ctiirvew/o super
,
~
~j General Land S1ope/Terrain F] o,
Design Speed, mph o2 L~ ;10. ,
Curb Type & Clear Zone
Nofi rta-clired,.
(see Sec. 3.15) Type I /'J2 ;/p2 'IR
} Sidewalk required? (yes/no) N°'t rQi 1~~` .
~
Note (1) Additional right-of-way may be given by the Sponsor.
' .
Discussion: .
2. According to the Design Engineer, what is the maximum number of units which will have
access from a single roadway? . What is the max. allowed per Sec.1.03?
3. Minimum intersection spacing is 300' for along a Principal or Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04),
and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street. What spacing is provided for this project?
~
~ -
PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PROJECT P ty 14 S PROJECT NAME: 2l V eyWatIt- I 1V! REVIEW ~ DATE:3 =1 0 2-
COUNTY REVIEWER: C1r1GIy CA4ftl PROJECT ENGINEER: 5%1SaI'1. Iv,UY?r1 REViEW STDS:
~
Review the Pre-Design Meeting Notes and check for unique design criteria; copy notes if applicable.
ROAD AND DRAINAGE PLAN - BASIC ELEMENTS
vesv"a0ruA❑ 1. The first sheet of the plans has the project title, vicinity map, STR, standard notes, index, and certification statement.
ves UKo❑wn❑ 2. North airow, scale, benchmarh, and station equations are shown.
YesdNo❑N/A❑ 3. Existing and proposed utilities are shown.
Yes❑No❑wnV 4. Curb retum elevations (BCR, MCR, ECR) are shown.
YcaYNoONlA❑ 5. Curb grades are 0.5
YesOrroF-IwAEf 6. Cul-de-sac curb is shown in profile.
YesivoONiA❑ 7. A typical cross section is identified for each individual road, public or private.
YesOr►o❑x/nRf 8. A.11 ditches are shown in profile and cross-section, and have a minimum grade of 0.5%.
YCsEfNo❑N/A❑ 9. Pipes and culverts are shown in profile (types, stations, offsets, lengths and inverts).
YesIRNoON/A❑ 10. Locations of curb inlets, grates, drywells (hard structures) are refercnced by stations and offsets.
vesgNo❑wn❑ 11. Swale floor is dimensioned, with floor elevation, sideslopes and depth indicated in the plan view and cross section.
vesno❑Nin❑ 12. Dryland grass seed mix is proposed where applicable, or hydroseed, sod or turf is specified.
Y~s~ ❑NiA❑ 13. Maintenance access is provided to all ponds, s~vales and structures.
v~sUrvo❑wn❑ 14. Random check indicates that pipe profile information correlates with general notes and plan view information.
vM❑r,o❑N/ANf 15. Project Agreement is completed and submitted with plans/report.
veANo❑N/n❑ 16. Erosion and Sedimentation Control plans are provided as part of the submittal package.
DRAINAGE REPORT - BASIC REQUIREMENTS
vesrrXIrun❑ 1. Separate pre-developed €ind post-developed basin maps, with contows, are provided.
veSrroON/A❑ 2. Existing natural drainage courses, floodplains and wetlands are shown on ttie basin maps (and plans, where necessary).
Ye5R1r,o13NIA0 3. Existing sheet flow patterns are maintained; no drainage is concentrated into a point discharge.
YeslYNoONin❑ 4. Hydrologic calculations utilize the appropriate method: Rational Method for 5 10 acres and SCS Method for _ 10 acres.
Yes❑xo❑NlAf 5. Post-developed basins with CN values that differ by 20 Pt have separate hydrographs for permeable & impervious areas.
vCsRfNo❑Kin❑ G. Hydrologic calcs: onsite 10 yr, offsite 50 yr runoffevent for swales; 50-yr dev volume for deten. ponds, or meet conditions.
vurro❑N/A❑ 7. 208 calculations include driveways and sidewalks directly adjacent to roads.
ves[]rvo❑N/ANr 8. Evaporative pond design utilizes a water balance cycle, 100-year storm in pond (Condition A).
YesONo❑x/aNf 9. Freeboard in detention, retention and evaporative ponds is a minimum of 1 ft.
vesONo❑N/nd 10. Berm design is provided for detention ponds in fill areas, particularly if adjacent to developed properly.
vANXIN/A❑ 11. Calculations for clear passing width are included 12 ft for local access, 16 ft for collector arterials and 24 ftforminor arteiials.
YesgNo❑N/A❑ 12. Runoffrates, for each separate basin, are compared; looking at entire basin versus road area only.
Yes0rro0rrinNr 13. Ditch calculations are provided and are designed for the 50 year storm plus 30% freeboard.
veg[]xo0wnfid 14. Pipe network analysis indicates pipe velocities of 4 ft/s (min) and a freeboard of 0.75 ft (min) in catchbasins and manholes.
Yesdxo❑N/A❑ 15. Curb and grate inlet capacities are calculAted and included.
Yes❑xo0rrInW 16. Sight distance analyses are included.
Updated: 02-11-02 Page l of 1
• ~ , ` i .
,
. Pre-Design Meeting Notes . .
Spokane County Engineers Office
-~h f=1yIy J
Project Name: RI < hddi*401 Project Number: 4Hf-e ~ _
Project Sponsor: CZ DEVELoPME~JT L. L. C. ' .
Sponsor's En ~neer:
~ Firm: C~C A SSUC r A T ES Design Engineer: SU SR N Mt.t R DpiY_
Meeting Date: JU I U 2 ~ 20~ i Meeting Time: ( 0~?j 0Q!1'i.
J .
County Staff Present at Meeting: G i nd Ca(tarl- '
Other. Meeting Attendees:
name/representing naine/representing '
name/representing name/representing
The Following Items need to be Discussed w% the Design Engineer
General Items
1 a. List certain' special requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval, EIS, or MDNS. This
is not an all-inclusive list. The Engineer and Sponsor is responsibie for adhering to all Conditions .
and design criteria_
I qqq '90AI) DESjGN s4undards . PuD .
descriphon reference
~ T~a~~'L A~~ 1tis~s l~ z~~lr~d ;~a-r ear_h hase .CCmnd 3) description
reference
~iUfa ~Qn ro~ 1 ~ d~s /`a ~ ~Qw /~l~/ P'iae 1 ~'6e C'o,~P. (rDrj
~P - ° ~
description reference .
Reliml,no( Cmeohworc~ Evalvohon (CbrAd
escription U reference
Fof ow R ec(roca 1~- r~menf W/
onolin
~ x0, lb . Does the En ineer have PY o~f the Examiner's/Staff Conditions of APProval? y~-5
. .2. Include Standard Plan notes in the Road and Drainage Plans. y E5
\ J Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 2
Spokane County Public Works ' , .
Road Plans
1. Road Classifications and Design Criteria. ~ #1 #2 #3 #4
Street Name
Classification 'PR1VA 16 ~21V~-7E
Roadway Width, W 24 t 24 1
~ ~~2vU ~SiYrr. ~V , - -
Minimum right-of-way ~tL ~t
width
see note (1) 4 /pf J,~
Min. Horiz. Curve w/ super _
Min. Horiz. Curve w/o super
General Land Slope/Terrain
Design Speed, mph r,2 d ,d2 D
y - - - -
Curb Type & Clear Zone
!pe '/R~
(see Sec. 3.15) )ype ~R y
Sidewalk required? (yes/no)
~
Note (1) Additional right-of-way may be given by the Sponsor.
~
Discussion:
, 2. According to the Design Engineer, what is the maximum number of units which will have
access from a single roadway? What is the max. allowed per Sec.1.03? 50
3. Minimum intersection spacing is 300' for along a Principal or Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04),
and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street. What spacing is provided for this project?
J
Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 3
Spokane County Public Works `
4. Are any off-site slope easements needed, or off-site right-of-way acquisitions needed? If so,
describe.
Nn n/E .
. 5. What type of tum-arounds are needed? (i.e. cul-de-sac, hammerhead, etc.)
. ~
~ Street Name Turn-around Type Location
- - - - - , - - - A. o m ~
6. Road Surfacing Requirements (Sec. 3.16)
a) What method in determining road surfacing requirements does the Design Engineer propose
to use (i.e. AASHTO Design Method, County thickness table, or other)? •
.
b) Provide the Design Engr. a copy of the Soil Sample Procedures, Design Report Format &
Alternate Pavement 'Design Table.
7. Does the Engineer plan on applying for any Design Deviations? If so, briefly describe
below.
Please note that approval of all Design Deviation's must be obtained prior to construction
plan submittal.
~nclud s(dewalk next -
.
t-0 Gutv ►~a.ar ~ ~
Storm Drainage
1. Basin Map
a) Did the Design Engineer bring to the meeting a basin map? yss If so, does the basin
map show topography and sufficient information to be useful? `l E-0 .
b) Does the basin map depict any contributing off-site runoff flowing onto the property? NO.
_ Does it appear to be correct? `i E$. If not, explain. c) Is a site visit needed to verify the basin limits? tA0 • Schedule for: .
.{Note: Concurrence with County Engineer's on basin limits is required prior to plan submittal. }
2. Is the site located within the Aguifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? YE 5 . What type of water
quality treatment is proposed by the Design Engineer?_ 'U)j) ' ponds 4Watec, .
Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 4Spokane County Public Works `
3. What subsurface investigations, if any, are needed with this project to make swe the
proposed disposal process will function as planned.
~ Q .
4. Are there downstream conditions which will affect the design of drainage facilities. If so
describe possible mitigative measures. No 5. Is maintenance access provided to each GPA swale or drainage pond? If there is something
unusual, what requirements were given to the Design Eng.?
~E5 . .
6. What does the Developer/Engr. propose for providing for perpetual maintenance of the
drainage facilities? Please briefly describe proposed mechanism, and what is needed to
accomplish this.
HomeownQrls A5SOC/',q&1'Or1 7a. What Design Storm(s) should be used in the course of analysis (i.e. 10-yr, 50-yr, etc.).
10- . 7b. Is a Detention or Retention system proposed? Please descnbe.
Nc)
8. Are Erosion Control Measures required with this project? If so, briefly describe applicable
requirements.
.
`l~ . t'4 ntcal re ire,rnehm
9. Is a second Pre-Design Meeting needed? .
. ,
Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 5
Spokane County Public Works
List of Documents Provided to the Sponsor's Engineer:
a) PV~,',-G=90 YYy ~°;t'(.flq 11o~es. -
b) . ; -
c) . .
d) -
e)
Any easements needed outside of the plat bourrdary, for drainage or other, are to be acquired prior -
to road and drairrage plan submittal. The Sponsor or Sponsor's Engineer shall provide separately
a legal description and Title Commitment (or similar proof of ownership) of the affected parcel(s)
for proposed easemenis.
.The Submittal Checklist, completed and signed by the Sponsor's E, ngineer, shall be provided with
each plan submittal. .
Note: Provide a copy of this completed documefrt to the Design Engineer at the end of the pre-
design nreeting. filename: PreDesign meeting -
!
BOND ESTIMATE *
Project Name: Riverwalk 11th Addition .
~r
Project Nwnber: P1414J
Date: May 3, 2002
Pr+epared by: Cindy Callan SrMAIST {~CUSUy
ftem Description Qty Unit Unit Price Totai
Drainage Items
1 DryweU, Type B(incl. backfll, filter fabric, frame & grate) 4 EA $ 2,700.00 $ 10,800
2 Concrete Inlet, Type 1 2 EA $ 600.00 $ 1,200
3 Curb Inlet, Type 2 4 EA $ 600.00 $ 20400
4 Pipe, 10-inch PVC 11 LF $ 15.00 $ 198
5 Pipe, 12-inch PVC 56 LF $ 20.00 $ 11120
6 Pond Excavation lncl. Haul 119 CY $ 8.00 $ 952
7 Topsoil 15 CY $ 6.00 $ 90
8 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000
Drainage ltems Sub-Total $ 19,760
Roadway items
9 Rough Grade (sub-grade preparafion) 694 CY $ 10.00 $ 6,940
10 Base Course 405 CY $ 24.00 $ 91720
11 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 63 TN $ 45.00 $ 2,835
12 Curb and Gutter, Type R 1,213 LF $ 10.00 $ 12,130
13 Sidewatk 445 SY $ 23.00 $ 10,235
Roadway ltems Sub-Total $ 41,860
Erosion Corrtrol ftems
14 Silt Fence 523 LF $ 4.00 $ 2,092
15 Rock Construction Entry 148 SY $ 16.00 $ 2,368
Erosion Control Items Sub-Total $ 4,460
Inspection
16 Inspection of Drainage Facilities 1 LS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500
17 Inspecfion of Roads . 6 STA $ 500.00 $ 3,000
Inspection Items Sub-Total $ 6,500
SUBTOTAL of ALL /TEMS $ 72,580
3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 4,420
Sub-Total including inflation $ 77,000
" GRAND TOTAL (includes multiptier of 1.10) $ 84,700
Y . ` _ -
' 4738061
002!2042 o 112
:23A CQNbRQN (;(INSTRIi(;TiON CQV 49.(H) Snnkane Co. WA
Spokane County Engineers
1026 W. Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA 99260-0170
(509) 477-3600
PUD
Document Title: DECLARATION OF COVEIVANT
Reference Numbers: PE-1414-81
Legal Description: Located in GVM'T Lot 5, SEC. 8, T.25N., R.45E., W.M.
Parcel Numbers: 55083.9043
Grantor and Grantee: C& L Developments, L.L.C., a Limited Liability Company
SPOKANE COUNTY and RIVERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of RIVERWALK ELEVENTH ADDITION
(hereinafter referred to as the "Development"), the undersigned covenants and agrees that:
~
1. The subdivider/sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in
conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office.
2. A lot is served by the private road when: a. the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on
the private road; or b. a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an
approach to the private road.
3. The RNERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest
shall maintain the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with the approved
plans on file in the County Engineer's Office.
4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Development or alteration thereof and served by a private road
shall be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities.
5. Maintenance fmancing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner .
determined by the RNERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in
interest. - 6. Should the RNERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION be terminated for any
reasons, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot owners, or their successors in interest, who
are members of the RNERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION at the time of said
termination.
7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County
standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage
facilities, each lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication.
8. Owners of lots within the Development who are served by such road may sue and recover damages
and attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Development which is similarly served who
refuses to participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance.
9. WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or otherwise
service the private roads and associated drainage f'acilities contained within or providing service to the
property described in this Development. By accepting this development or subsequently by allowing a
building permit to be issued for property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for
said private road and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or
nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide
drainage or snow removal on a private. road or its associated drainage facilities.
- -
~r
h Y\~ ~ ; _
4738061
' Q6~12 t2042 o 112
:23A
CONDRON CONSTRUCTION toV Mb0 Snekane Ce. Mfb
10. Whenever the RNERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in
interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice
will be given to the RIVERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION or their successors in
interest by the County. If not corrected after 10 days, the County has the right to correct the maintenance
failure or have it corrected at the expense of the RNERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION or their successors in interest or lots in the development.
11. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots
within drainage easements or floodplain areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage whatsoever,
including but not limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or
maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property.
12. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs,
successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and
drainage facilities as provided herein.
IN V'J'TTNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this instrument to be executed on this ~ day of
2009,
~ -
C&L DEVELOPMENTS, L.L.C.,
a Limited Liability Company
BY: ~ Ci
ITS: . TANYA L. NODDINGS
STA7E OF WASHI N6TON
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) NOTARY PUBI(C
)ss MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 12-18-04
County of4::-7~~~~`-Q
~
On this day of 20 02,-before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
the State of Washington, personally &~pearedt-e:r-q (~.,.C,,r,.,,G..e►-,,to me lalown to be the w~~~of
C&L DEVELOPMENTS, L.L.C., a Limited LiabiliPy Company, that he executed the within and
foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of
said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to
execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed (if any) is the corporation seal of said corporation.
Given under my hand and official seal the day and year last above written.
~ ~
NOi~~R~'UBLIC in~d for the State of Washington,
residing
My commission expires ~ ~~,C~~{
\
- 2 -
~
. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
105 W. THI1tD
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
Prepared for:
Order No.: DS-235858
C& L DEVELOPMENT, LLC. Charge: $175.00
ATTN: CRAIG CONDRON Tax: $14.18
802 W. ROSEWOOD Total: $189.18
cc: CLC Ass./Mark Duggner
S E C O N D R E P O R T
P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E
Certificate for filing Plat of :
RIVERWALK ELEVENTH ADDITION
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's
and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for.
the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit:
That portion of Government Lot 5 in Section 8, Township 25 North,
Range 45 East, W.M., described as follows:
BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Tract C, RIVERWALK FIFTH
A.DDITION, according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 24 of ~
Plats, pages 72 and 73, thence along the boundary of said plat the
following 12 courses: 1) South 12°19'll" East, a distance of 110.59 feet; 2) South 84018'44" West, a distance of 22.15 feet;
3) South 12°19'll" East, a distance of 117;84 feet;
4) South•77140'49" West, a distance of 40.57 feet;
5) South 12°19'll" East, a distance of 145.00 feet;
6) North 77040'49" East, a distance of 10.00 feet;
7) South 12°19'll" East, a distance of 66.34 feet;
8) North 65009'55" East, a distance of 262.49 feet;
9) North 78023'35" East, a distance of 82.49 feet;
10) South 09004' 40" East, a distance of 100.25 feet to a non-
tangent curve concave southerly with a radial bearing of
South 13023126" East, and a radius of 267.50 feet;
legal cont. t'
Page 1 of 5
, _ -
~Order No. MW-235858
legal cont.
11) Westerly along said curve through a central anale of
703414011, an arc distance of 35.38 faPERIWALK 1~~
12} South 09°04'40" East, a distance of eet to the
northwest. corner of Lot 4, Block THIRD
ADDITION, according to.the Vlat thereof recorded in Book
23 of Plats, page 96;
thence South 09004140" East, along the west line of said lot,
a distance of 49.14 f eet to the northeast corner of Trace A of said
plat of RIVERWALK FIFTH ADDITION; thence South 65009'S5" West,
along the north line of said tract, a distance of 100.56 feet to
the southeast corner of Lot 10, Block 4, RIVERWAL- K 9TH ADDITION,
according to the plat thereof recorded in Book 25 of Plats, pages
40 and 41; thence along the boundary of said plat the following 12
courses:
1) North 2405011911 West, a distance of 10-9.96 feet;
2) North 28014147" West, a distance of 35.06 feet;
3) North 24050' 19" West, a distance of 110."00 feet;
4) South 65009'41" West, a distance of 130.'00 feet;
5) South 60036' 02" West, a distance of 45.T1 feet;
6) South 89025156" West, a distance of 95.09 feet to a non-
tangent curve concave westerly with a radial lpearing of
South 69040'47" West, and a radius of 342.50 feet;
7) Northerly~-along said curve through a central angle of
5025s 58" , an arc distance of 32.48 feet;
8) North 89025'56" East, a d'istance of 109.88 feet;
9) North 01012' 48" East, a distance of 71.,97 feet;
10) North 5002012211 West, a distance of 132,50 feet;
- 11) North 12020103" East, a distance of 58.39 feet;
12) North 32018110" West, a distance of 181.41 feet to the
most northerly corner of Lot 1, Block lrof said plat; thence North 66024124" East, a distance of 345.58 feet; thence
North 80041138" East, a distance of 39.08 feet to the Point of
Beginning; . '
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
(To be known as RIVERWALK ELEVENTH ADDITION)
VESTED IN: ,
C& L DEVELOPMENTS, L.L.C., a Limited Liability Company.
Page 2 of 5
. . . .
Order No. MW-235858
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as
to Parcel No. 55083.9073.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to
the Company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record
therefor, the Company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy
relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No.
19.
3. Covenants, conditions and restrictions imposed by instrument recorded on
July 24, 1996, under Recording No. 4018241, including but not limited to
rights or benefits which may be disclosed affecting land outside the
boundary described in Schedule A. (Affects Westerly portion and other
properties)
4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County, a political subdivision
PURPOSE: Constructing, operating and maintaining
sewer
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: October 31, 1996
RECORDING NO.: 4050305
This easement shall run with the land and will be terminated at such
time the described area is platted
Page 3 of 5 "
. . . .
Order No. MW-235858
5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GR.ANTEE: Riverwalk Owner Association, a Homeowners
Association
PURPOSE: Temporary turnaround easement
AREA AFFECTED: Over a portion of Government Lots 5 and 6
of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 45
East, W.M., more particularly described as
follows: Beginning at the most Northerly
corner of Tract "H" of Riverwalk First
Addition as per plat thereof recorded in
Book 23 of Plats, Page 37 through 40;
thence North 22056159" West, a distance of
689.05 feet to the True Point of Beginning
of this easement description; thence South
77040149" West, a distance of 150.00 feet;
thence North 1201911111 West, a di stance of
150.00 feet; thence North 77040149" East,
a distance of 190757 feet; thence South
12°19'17" East, a distance of 57.50 feet;
thence South 7704014911 West, a distance of
40.57 f eet ; thence South 1201911111 East, a
distance of 92.50 feet to the True Point
of Beginning; Said Temporary Easement is
hereby granted to Riverwalk Owner's
Association, until such time as Riverwalk
Lane continues and the areas of the
easement has been platted, at which time
the Temporary Turnaround Easement will be
terminated
RECORDED: March 12, 1997
RECORDING NO.: 4083784
6. SHORT FORM DEED OF TRUST, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND FIXTURE FILING AND THE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GR.ANTOR: C& L Developments, L.L.C., a Limited
Liability Company
TRUSTEE: Pacific Northwest Title Company of
Spokane, a Washington Corporation
BENEFICIARY: Continental Savings Bank, a Washington
state chartered savings bank
ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $182,000.00
DATED: January 15., 1999
RECORDED: January 19, 1999
RECORDING NO.: 4319424 and 4319425
Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by
contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual.
Page 4 of 5
~ • 1
1 I
`I 7 . • , ' '
- Order No. MW-235858
7. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer
construction, referred to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This
charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer services. Please
contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for information (509)
477-3604.
DATED AS OF March 28, 2002 at 8:00 a.m. TR.ANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BY
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Donnalee Sullivan, Title Officer
dsullivanQlandam.com
dg Page 5 of 5
%I 5
Office of the County Engineer Spokane County, Washington
Date: May 6, 2002
To: John Saywers, P.E.
CLC Associates, Inc.
From: Cindy Callan
Development Engineering Services .
RE: P1414J - Riverwalk llth Addition
Please note that the following information must be placed on the face of
the final plat.
DRAINAGE LANGUAGE:
Drainage easements as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purpose of conveying and storing
stormwater runoff, and for installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities
which dispose of and treat stormwater runoff, are hereby granted to the Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners
Association and Spokane County. Tracts B and C are hereby dedicated to the Riverwalk Eleventh Home
Owners Association for the purpose of conveying and storing stormwater runoff, and for installing,
operating and maintaining drainage facilities which dispose of and treat stormwater runoff. A d.rainage
easement is granted to Spokane County over Tracts B and C for inspection and emergency maintenance of
stormwater facilities.
Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right to ingress and egress to, over and
from all public drainage easements for the purposes of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage
swales, ponds, culverts and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the property owner(s) or
the Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to
inspect or mainta.in drainage facilities located outside of public rights-of-way, except in cases where
Spokane County specifically assumes that responsibility in writing. Neither does Spokane County accept
any liability for any failure by the property owner(s) to properly maintain such areas.
The property owner(s) within this plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the
surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. If the
property owner(s) fail to maintain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or drainage
facilities on private properties, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner(s). If not
corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the
maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the property owner(s).
Any building that is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive
drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a
window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said pvsitive drainage shall consist of a minimum
slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be
graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural
drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in
an approved drainage facility. All drainage facilities for this plat, including any `208' swales, shall be
constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Any
proposed changes to the approved road and drainage plans must be approved by the Spokane County
Engineer's Office prior to construction of said changes.
There may exist properties located uphill and adjacent to this subdivision that periodically discharge
stormwater runoff onto individual lots within this plat. Stormwater runoff from nearby uphill properties
should be expected, and during snow melt periods or wet seasons the lots may be subjected to higher
amounts of stormwater runoff than what is normally observed or anticipated. Because stormwater runoff
from adjacent properties have discharged onto this plat prior to development, stormwater runoff will likely
continue to do so after development.
The property owner(s) within this plat shall maintain all water quality swales or ponds (`208' swales)
situated on their resUective properties, and any portion of a`208' swale situated in a public right-of-way
adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified in the currently approved
and accepted plans on file at Spokane County Engineer's Office. No structures, including fences, shall be
constructed directly over or within a`208' swale without the expressed written consent of the Spokane
County Engineer. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and/or maintain the
drainage easements or `208' swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the lot
owner(s) to properly maintain such areas.
The Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association or its successors in interest shall maintain any
drainage facilities, located in Tracts B and C, in conformance with the approved plans on file at the
Spokane County Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not limited to,
keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage
facilities as needed, and maintaining live native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales
located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and
percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The
Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association shall be responsible for payment of all claims and other
liabilities which may become due for said maintenance responsibilities.
If the Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association, or their successors in interest, fails to maintain the
drainage facilities in conformance with the accepted drainage plan on file at the Spokane County Engineer's
Office, a notice of such failure may be given to the Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association, or their
successors in interest, by the County Engineer. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice,
Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the
Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association, or their successors in interest.
Should the Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in
interest shall be the individual lot owner(s), or their successors in interest, who are members of the
Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association at the time of said termination. The successors in interest
shall share equally in the responsibility and cost of maintaining said drainage facilities.
The developer, property owners, and the Riverwalk Eleventh Home Owners Association waive any and all
claims for damages against any governmental authority arising from the construction, ownership or
maintenance of public facilities. This waiver includes claims of any nature, including but not limited to
person and real property damages as well as any inverse condemnation claims.
. •
. ,
~ . . ~
After Record.ing Retum to: .
Jerry Trun.kenbolz
TRUNKENBOLZ I ROHR PLLC
12704 E. Nora Avenue
Spokane, WA 99216
RECIPROCAL ACCESS INGRESS AND EGRESS .
EASEMENTS (Riverwalk 3~a, Scn, 9ch and Eleventh Additions
Riverwalk Subdivisions, Spokane County, Washington)
Known all men by these presents that:
a) the undersigned Grantor, who is the Owner of the real property legally
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto (To be known as Riverwalk Eleventh Addition)
and who is also the party in voting control of the Homeowners Association for the real
property consisting Riverwalk Eleventh Addition, does hereby grant perpetual, non-
exclusive easements for access, ingress and egress, over all streets or roadways, shown on
the plats of R.iverwalk Eleventh Addition (a Plat to be filed), to the lots/owners of lots in
Riverwalk 3`d1Sch and 9`" Additions;
Page 1
a
• \b) tbe undersigned Riverwalk Owners Association, a Washington non-profit
corporation, is the owner and entity in control of all streets and roadways in Riverwalk
3rd~ Scn and 9thAdditions (which abut and have common boundary's with Riverwalk
Eleventh Addition and/or contain private roadways linking the private roadways within
Riverwalk Eleventh to County roads) pursuant to paragraph 1.1.5 and Article 3 of the
DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR
RNERWALK, recorded under Spokane County Auditor's File Number [??]9507250312,
in Volume 1752, Page 0310 et. seq., Records of Spokane County, Washington. Said Plats
are recorded with the Spokane County Auditor's Office in Volume/Book 23, Page 96, (3ra
Addition), VolumeBook 24, Pages 72 and 73, (Sth Addition), and VolumeBook 25,
Pages 40 and 41, (9th Addition), records of Spokane County, Washington. Riverwalk
Owners Association does hereby grant perpetual, non-exclusive easements for access,
ingress and egress, over all streets or roadways, shown on the plats of Riverwalk 3rd
Addition, 5`h Addition and Riverwalk 9`h Addition, to the lots/owners of lots in Riverwalk
Eleventh Addition.
Page 2
1 ' ' ' • _ '
This grant of reciprocal easements shall perpetually bind and inure to the heirs,
assigns and transferees of the respective Associations and lots/lot owners for all lots
shown on the plats for Riverwalk 3~a, Scn, 9ch and Eleventh Additions.
In Witness whereof, the undersigned Grantor and Owners Associations have
executed this agreement on this day of April, 2002.
GRANTOR: CONDRON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BY: CRAIG CONDRON, President
ASSOCIATIONS:
RIVERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION
By: CONDRON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BY: CRAIG CONDRON, President
RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
By:
It's
By:
Iti s
Page 3
\
, • ~ STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss.
COUNTY OF SPOK:ANE )
. On this day personally appeared before me CR.AIG CONDRON
to me known to be the President of CONDRON CONSTRUCTION, INC., the corporation
who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrurnnent
to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes
therein mentioned and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the said instrument.
GNEN under my hand and official seal this day of APRII,, 2002.
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing in My Commission Expires:
STATE OF WASHINGT4N )
. ) ss.
COUNTY OF SPOK:ANE )
On this day personally appeared before me CRAIG CONDRON
to me known to be the President of RIVERWALK ELEVENTH HOMEOWNERS'
ASSOCIATION, the non-profit corporation who executed the within and foregoing
instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed
of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned and on oath stated that he
was authorized to execute the said instrument.
GIVEN under my hand and official seal this day of April, 2002.
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing in
My Commission Expires:
C/WPF/JLT/REAUCONDRON CONSTlRECE? EASE 3,5,9&11-003
Page 4
EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION
• (Riverwalk Eleventh Addition)
. ' ,
• -
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
TRLINI{ENBOLZ ( ROHR PLLC
12704 EAST NORA AVENUE
SPOK:ANE, WA 99216
RECIPROCAL ACCESS
INGRESS AND EGRESS
EASEMENTS
(Riverwalk 3a, 5~', 9th and Eleventh Additions
Riverwallc Subdivisions, Spokane County, Washington)
GRANTOR: CONDRON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
LEGAL: A portion of Government Lot 5, Section 8, Township 25 North, Range
45 East, W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington. (For full legal
description see Exhibit "A" of this document)
TAX PARCEL NO. 55083.9073
ADDITIONAL GRANTORS:
RIVERWALK OWNERS ASSOCIATION
LEGAL: All streets and roadways located in the Plats of Riverwalk 3`a, 5`h and 9`n
Additions, as per Plats recorded with the Auditor for Spokane County, under
VolumeBook 23, Page 96, (3rd Addition) and VolumeBook 24, Pages 72 and 73
(Sth Addition) and VolumeBook 25, Pages 40 and 41 (9'" Addition), respectively,
records of Spokane County, Washington. No tax numbers known.
,J w Mt ]DRAFT COPY
~ SL'IBJECT TO REVISION
EXFiIBIT "rA"
. RI VERWALK ELEVENTH ADDI TION
(Spokane County Tax Parcel 55083.9073)
(Legal Description)
LEGAL DESCR1PTI0N '
That portion of Gavern=ni Lvt 5 in Scstion 6, lovinship 75 North, Rortge 45 EoSt, W.kt., Spdcvne Cvunty, 4Vashirrglon more particulorti dcscribed os
follaws - -
OEGINNING ot ihc nvrihvresl cvrner of Tracl C, RNERWALK FIFTri AQDITION, oaording ta Ihc plat thereof recarded in Baok 24 of Plois, Pogc~s 77 oRd 73,
. ihence alonq the ixiundory of soi6 piat the follawinq twelve (12) courses .
t) S.1 r 19' 11 ° E., a dislonce o( 110.59 fee1;
2) 5.$4'18'44` IV., o distanoe of 22.15 fcet; .
3) S. I 2'17' 11 r E., o d'&-tance of 111.84 (eet;
4) 5.77'40'49' W., o disinnee a( 4-057 feet; .
. 5~) 5,12'19'11" E., o d"istanee of 145.00 feet;
6) N.77'40'4g" C., o distorrce of 10.00 feel;
7) S.12'19'l l° E.. o dristance of G6.14 feef; .
- 8) N.8509'55" E., a distonce of 262.49 fest;
g) N.78723'35" E., a diskonce of 82.49 feet; 10) 5.09'04`40° E, o d;siance af t0U.25 feel tQ a non-iQngent curve concave souiher~ wi'th a rad'iaI henr;ng of S.13'23`26` E., and ❑ rad;us of 20.50
feet;
11) wesierl~ obng saed curve through a ccntrul onglc of 7'14'40", on orc dislanee of 35.3$ fec#-I '
12) c,09'04`40° E, o d;stance of lOQBg feet tn the northwest tomer of Ld 4, filock 4, PoVERVdALK THIRD ADORIQN, accordng ta the plat ihereof
recorded in floak 23 af Rlots. Poge 96; ihence S_09'G4'40" E., olong ihe wesf line of soid IQt, o d~stonee of 49.14•feet to the northeost eernar of
Trad A ot soid ploi af RiVERWAIK FIF'fH A(IDITIQN; thence S.6S09'55' Vl,, along ihe narih line of said lracl, a dis#once o-i 34O.56 feet la the southeosl
corner of LQi 10, 8bc1c 4, RIVERN/ALK 9TH ADDIlION, accord;ng in the Not therenf recarded ;n Book 25 of Rlois, Pnges 40 nrrd 41; therrte along the
boundary of said plai the fdlowhg tweive (12) eourses:
1) N.74 50'19' IY., o distonce of 109.96 fcet;
2) N.21T14'41' W, o disi(nce of 3506 feet;
3) N_24'50'19" W., a distanee nf I1Q_00 fmi; •
4) S.65'09'41 ' M. o disiance of 130.0D ieet; '
5) 5.6Q'302' 1V., o distonee af 45.11 feef;
fi) S.H9'25'S6' 1V., o (ristance of 55.09 (eet to o non-tonqenf curve concuve westerfy wilh o rodial beoring af S_69'40`41° W_, ond a rodius of 342.50
feet; ' . .
7) nqrtherlyr Qlong so~pd curve throuqfi o centrvl angle of 575an orc disto= af 32.46 feet
8) N19'25`56tt E_. o d;stonce of 109.88 feet;
g) N.D1'12'4$" E., a distance a( 71.97 feet; ' 10) N.50'20'220 W., o dstance of 132.90 (eetc-
11) N.12'20'03 C, n distonoe af 58.39 ieets ' . 12) N.3718"10" W., o d'stanee af 161.41 (eet to the mast norlherly corrter af Lat 1, Block 1 aF said Pol;
thence 'N.W24'24' E., a cFistonee of 345.58 feet; iheRce N.8(]'4138` E•., odistonee af 390 feel to thg Paint al Eleginning;
COf1I01R5 4,91 oeres, mare ar less.
I • ' '
DRAFT COPY
SvBJECT'Ir0 REVISION
. EXHIBIT "g"
RI VERWAIK EI.EVENTH ADDI TION COl►MON AREA
(Portion of Spokane County Tax Parcel 55083.9073)
(Common Area Legal Description)
Tract"A" (common park area) and Tracts "B" and "C" (private roads to be known as Riverwalk Lane and Shannon Lane) as
shown on the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat of RIVERWALK
ELEVENTH ADDITION, records of Spokane County, Washington,
being a part of the following described real property:
.,-,GA'=_ ~~SCR?"HOr,E - -
Tha; -=rtion of ~ovvrmv~ Let 5 in Sccliun U. ivvrnsh;r 75 ?kzth. (;F;oqc 45 Eask, WA., Spdcune Lwrdy, Wvshingion maru piGrJCi~I.-ir:~.-j7rixd o,-,
follavtG'-
K51UhIhG cit the nwthvrus: c~--rtPr c# 7r*rt i., 19WEf;`iv'AJ<. rIFif-i AMITPuN, ,r,.c;vciing t Eh.- -3rq ttti:-.Toi reccrd,,,# in Br,~;k 74 c~ Plats, Fbg,-,s -2 cnd 7~,
then--a cloN tnre bourc;ary o.` so:c ~ici- 'tse (ollvrinc t-wpJve f 12; caurw.s
1) S.1 2" 9' 11° "E., e di!AaRee of i 1teg";
5.8Z'18'414" 'fl, c disipn;z a,- 77.15 icrE;
3) S. 121 4'' 1' f., c &turce cf 11734 (eel;
4) 5.l''4L1j`4J' W.. o dis-Ioncs ell 40.57 ~ga;,
U:istg nee of 145.`J-0 feet; .
l..7 d;hvKrx (',f 1 0.VV 1;
S.1 -4* 19' :1 ° E. a.`'i;s',amle ot ao.34 Ied: -
~ ti.a5'99`5" E., ndistanceoi 262.49 fraff;; .
N.:i0723 cL a ;iisU Pc:.- a;1 52.49 feeii .
10) S.C?'i4E40` E, cd-stcnce af M_2.:s fea! ia c- nan-innpnt curve'mnmve :,outhuly t~~ith s rcdui lawr~ny ;.a S.1323`28'r d~i-d a re+;us af 760.50
feet; .
tT) wcsterty ahriq "-id c:+vc ;;;;o~rh a -.C*vl wigl-- Vi 7'34'4C, On arc distan;c- ~3f 35.38 ~.wr
12) S_0?'04`40` E, a dis'tance af li;CM !e& #a the re;tIuvesi carrer 6f L,:`. 4, Slodc 4, Ri'dERtiALK TF,rD ,;DdfflON, sctbrd'ra lb the plai rrven`
reeosdedj in HeDk ?3 Df Piats, Rap (-Ic•; thence S.N04'4Q" E_, elorg tha wes't. line af rj'd °aj, a Ers-wnce cf 49_1+ fee1 'ta the nQrtfreesl ccrr,?r ai
TraEi A af soid plnt ed, RTF2YlAIK FlfTH F.CCI`IvIN; iheREe S.55'-N.-z5' W, alanq the narth 'r'ne af said troc, u disionce 300.5a feat .e ta;e sautheasi
ca;rvar uf Lat 10, Bla--i: RKERlIlAlK STE-I AZU'lI"N; actarairrg tC tne p4ci thh-ito6 re~--ded ir xok ?5 tif Rtats, Feges 40 and 41; t~reene cieng lhQ
hour:t-ory of scid p!af the fdlcv;ing iwehva_ Z; ea:r~s_ .
t) h.Z4'-5,1`19' h'., odistonce T; 109.936 (Mt=
1) N.?8' :4'4; `\y., o~i-jonce of 4S.0E fee~j
_24'50'19" 1Y_ a di5#ones Df 110-69 tmt;
I) N
41 3.65!C1?`41 ' V., o ciis'toReg of i 3L,00 fe't: , .
53 S.c,0'.,Lf,'0/'-F C, v dis' arrcz ar !~`.11 ~cR; .
a} 5B..0'25s6' W a d'fftnte a~` 95.Q9 feet to a r,~n-fanqeenl -urve co;rave ive;erEy w;tf; bearirxq e( S.60 '40`.L7° Vf., vrrd a ro&:s a,` 3M%
feet;
7) ncw-th:rh; abng said cur.e thre* o centryi crg*-- e~ 5'255Ei". er o;;, distame af 37.4E fc~
8) t:_W25`56~ IL'_ R&s:ance oi 1109.88 fee4= .
o} N.€11' i2W E, a disLance o; 71N feet;
10) N,wG'ZCs*2Z' Vr., o drsta~u~u V 132.50 F°ct~ .
t I) KUL 20'03 CF a 65tonte cz}` ~B-34 iek; -
14"j N-32'18'10' Vr, a distanee ai' 1 B: .r1 feet to the r^os: nerft►erly eDrre; cf Lat i, Bloe:: 1Gl' sa~d
Ltrerve N,W24'24' E., o dstanee V, 345-118 faet; thP.ReE "J.8941 38' E.. a dsstancz on0 39,013 feeL Fa the Fcint wif Eleginning;
i,ontoins 4.97 oerES, mQr-E or feii:.
. ,
~
Spokane County Engineers .
1026 W Broadway
Spokane WA 99260-0170
509)477-3600 PL1D
Document Title DECLARATION OF COVENANT
Reference Numbers
Legal Aescription
Parcel Number '
Grantors and Grantees
In consideration of the approval by Spokane Counry of
(hereinafter refened to as the "Development"), the undersigned covenants and agrees that:
1. The subdivider/sponsor will construct the private roads and associated drainage facilities in conformance with
the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office.
2. A lot is served by a private road when: a. the only road frontage for the lot in the Development is on the
private road, or; b. a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to
the private road.
3. The
Home ONmers Association or their successors in interest shall maintain the private roads and associated
drainage facilities in conformance with the approved plans on file in the County Engineer's Office.
4. The owner(s) of any lot created by the Development or altemation thereof and served by a private road shall
be responsible for maintenance of said private road, including associated drainage facilities.
5. Maintenance financing of the private roads and associated drainage facilities shall be in a manner deterrruned
by the
Home ONvners Associatioo or their successors in interest.
6. Should the
Home Owners Association be terminated for any reason, the successors in interest shall be the individual lot
owners, or their successors in interest, who are members of the
Home Owners Association at the time of said termination.
7. In the event such private road including associated drainage facilities is improved to Spokane County standards
for public streets, and the County is willing to accept the dedication of such road and drainage facilities, each
lot owner shall execute any documents necessary to accomplish such dedication.
8. Owners of lots within the Development who ae served by such road, may sue and recover damages and
attorneys' fees from any owner of any lot within the Development which is similarly served who refuses to '
participate in the road and drainage facilities construction, financing, and maintenance.
9. WAItiNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, or maintain or othenvise service the
private roads, and associated drainage facilities contained within or providing service to the property
described in the Development. By accepting this deielopment or subsequently by allowing a building pennit to '
be issued for properly on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road atid the
owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind of natacre whatsoever to establish,
ezamine, survey, construct, alter repair, ifnprove, maintain, provide drainage or snow removal ofi a private
i•oad or its' associated drainage facilities.
1
V%
~
~ • ~ t~
10. Whenever the
Home Owners Association or their successors in interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in
conformance with the approved drainage plan, a notice will be given to the
Home Owners Association or their successors in interest by the County. If not corrected after 10 days, the
County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense of the
Home Owners Association, their sacceSSOrs in interest, or lots in the development.
11. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within
drainage easements or floodplain areas, no the responsibility for any drainage, whatsoever, including but not
limited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maincenance of drainage
courses in drainage easements on private property.
12. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs,
successors or assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road and
drainage facilities as provided herein.
OWNER
OWNER
Dated this day of , 20
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
:ss
Corcnty of Spokane )
On this day personally appeared before me
known to me to be the individual(s) described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument and
acknowledged thai he/she/they signed the same as his/her/their free and voluntary act and deed for the uses and
purposes therein stated.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this day of , 20 .
Notary Public in and for the State
of Washington, residing at Spokane
k\f\declapud 1/200
2
PLAT 'NAMr, N° • .
. S'l'e1'1'1S'1'1CS 1)~~'1'1~,
Lql 4-,'~> R~ < < tA W i~i:,t cltieck r~~e-6,00?
C) Numbc:r al'Lots , o.r,
i20.1c1 1•f iles (Nc;w)
Tot11 r\rcii ~ ~ 9 ~ ~4c= A
L
. ► -
MAP
Norilt nrrow
Sc<<Ic:
i_c~;crtcl
I'roccclures & Cquipment
B;isis ol' 13ctirings
l'lat Loc;ltian l3y "1'itlc ~'t ► L~t
Oi'licial Signature I31ocks C ~
Survevors Cc:rtilicate
i'.nncl Nanus
Roacl Wiclths
r\ct,jlcen1 Arctt
1_ot & 131oc4; Ntimbc:rs
f:/\V Dc(lic:111011 (IeSIgllil(t:(I ~
I rooc Sirip,
3 12l'5 0il GI_O Corners
Tract X
I_ot Arca5 ' ~ -
13erlc;ll 1v(;Ifk /V
CIoSIICc:
`E~~~~2 1)I~nrcf~'i'rorv
Ocscri~~linn (10 lvit
i)escripiioii (To Cerc) . ~
Owners
C~
. .
Cirtilic;ilc: tn 1'1a1
J v
1 Foot Strips
l:ln - CI'1: Sm~cmcnt
Acc:css I'roltihi►ec1
{:/W Dec1it',111011
• ~
~
Drlinasc L,1nguaSe
Ur1inase Cnvenant ll ~ ,
f=1L}o(i lwmur,>»cc
209 13oncls - $1,000.00 ea 208 ('LANS Ai'PROVED
~ ~
i3rivi►c r,oad noe. #'s (n f~2 C1 ~ ~T~~SC1~
. ~ . -
1'riv;itc ito.ul
R0aci Plans ~C
A-
Ro,icl (lond
12oacl 13oilcl inspcction
V
Sisnccl 13y iinbinerr
7
451, ~ (4
~ . ~
-p
~
SN,
_""~L - •
1,\il\I~~~1:~11ii1.Ck•1it1U
,
BON D ESTI MATE ~
Project Name: Riverwaik 11th Addidon ~
Project Number: P1414J ~
Date: May 3, 2002
Prepared by: Cindy Capan . &"Wf {~OLIMY
_ ftem Description Qty Unit Unrt Price Totat
Drainage ttems 1 Dryweli, Type B(incl. backflll, fifter fabric, frame & grate) 4 EA $ 2,700.00 $ 10,800
2 Concrete Intet, Type 1 2 EA $ 600.00 $ 1,200
3 Curb Inlet, Type 2 4 EA $ 600.00 $ 2,400
4 Pipe, 104nch PVC 1'I LF $ 18.00 $ 198
5 Pipe, 124nch PVC 56 LF $ 20.00 $ 1,120
6 Pond Excavation Ind. Hau1 119 CY $ 8.00 $ 952
7 Topsoil 15 CY $ 6.00 $ 90
8 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000
Drainage ftems Sub-Total $ 19,760
Roadway ttems
9 Rough Grade (sub-grade preparation) - 694 CY $ 10.00 $ 6,940
10 Base Course : 405 CY $ 24.00 $ 9,720
11 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 63 TN $ 45.00 $ 21835
12 Curb and Gutter, Type R 1,213 LF $ 10.00 12,130
13 Sidewalk 445 SY $ 23.00 $ 10,235
Roadway ltems Sub-Total . $ 41,860
Erosion Control items
14 Sitt Fence • 523 LF $ 4.00 $ 2,092
15 Rock Construction Erytry 148 SY $ 16.00 2,368
Erosion Control Items Sub-Total 4,460
tnspection -
- 16 inspection of Drainage Facilities 1 LS $ 3,300.00 $ 3,500
17 6_ STA $ 500.00 $ 3,000
Inspection Items Sub-Total $ 6,500
SUBTOTAL ofALL ITFMS $ 72,580
3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 4,420
(P _ /1 I
v, ~ ~ vv
Sub-Total mcluding mflation $ 77,000
Ok 3RAND TOTAL (includes muitiplier of 1.10) $ 84,700
J
I
BOND ESTIMATE
Rraject Name: Ri►►erwalk 11#r Addition
Project Nurnber: P1414J )AL
Date: May 3, 2002
Prrepared by: Cindjr Callan
Ilern Descriipfioan . 1Jntt Unit Price Tota!
Draimge ftems . .
1 Drywell, Type B(incl. bacltfil1, fitter fabric, frame & grarte) 4 EA $ 2,700.00 $ 74,804
2 Cancre#s Infet, Type 1 2 E.A $ 600.00 $ 1,200
3Curb Inletr 1'ype 2 4 EA $ 600.00 $ 2,400
4 Pipe, i 0-inch PVC 11 LF $ 1$.00 $ 198
5 Pipe, 12-inch PIIC 56 LF $ 20.00 $ 1,120
6 Pond Excavatian !nd_ Haul lig cy $ 8 .00 $ 952
7 Tapsoil 15 CY $ 6.00 $ 90
8 Clearing and Grubbirtg 1 LS $3,0DD.0D $ 3,000
Drar'n$ge Items Sub-Total $ 19,760
Raadway ftems -
$ Raugh Grade (sub~rade prepa~tion) 59~4 Cl~ ~ 1 Q.~~ ~ ~~~~40
10 Base Course 405 CY $ 24,04 $ 9,720
i 1 Asphalt Concrete Pavement - 63 7N $ 45.04 $ 2,835
12 Curb and Gufter, Type R - 1,213 LF $ 10.00 $ 12,130
13 Sidewralk 445 Sll $ 23.00 $ 10,235
Roadwayltems Sub-Tota! _ $ 41,860
Erosivn Gvintral Item~ ~
14 Si1# Fence - 523 LF $ 4.00 $ 21492
15 Rock Cans#uction Entry " 148 SY $ WOO $ 2,366
Erosr'on Con#ro1 ltetrrs Sub-Total $ 4,460
Inspection
ifi Inspet;tion of Drainage Fac,ilifies 1 LS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500
17 B STA $ 500.00 $ 3,000
lnspectron ftems Sub-Total $ 6,500
- SUBrvTAL ~~ALL rTEMs $ 72,580
3% inflation frorn year 2002 to 2004 $ 41420
r~ vi Sub-Total including tnflafiorr $ 77,000
a
;RAND TOTAL (includes multipl'er ot` 1.10) _ $ 843700
i.r~ 4 P\
~
- - ,
=Rom ANui..E DrST NOR rH EaS r Tu
P1414J R I VERWAl...li 1 1 Ti-i PLAT BOUNnRY 6-27--2001 D. BER1"U
AUTO INIVEF?SE
57AFtT 1 500. 0000 1 500. 0000 1
1 IiVV S 12 19 11.00 E 1 10. 5900 1:s91. g56E 1523.5962 2
2 I NV S 84 18 44.00 W k. 2.1500 1389.7614 i~,01. 5bb3 3
3 iiVV S 12 19 1 3.. ~c~O E 117. 84kYO 12t4. 6;50 15`6. 6984 4
4 INV S 77 40 49.00 W 40.5700 12,6b. 9IEs7 14Es1. 0€+26 5
5 I N V S 12 19 1 1. 00 E 145. 0000 1124. s 17*8 1IS 18. ~.~008 6
c INV N 77 40 49.00 E 10. IZiOCAO 1 i26. 4t;14 15`?. 7705 7
7 INV S 12 19 11.00 E 66.3400 1061.6391 1541. y2-5::; 8
6 INV N 65 09 55.00 E 262.4900 1171.8855 1760. 141CA y
9 INV tV 78 23 35.00 E 82.4900 1188.4822 18E0. 9442 1o
10 I IVV S 904 40.00 E 100. 2500 1089 .487ES 1876.7611 11
RAD I AL N 13 23 26.00 W
UkL"I"A 7 34 40. OOLl"
RAD I US 267. 5tZi00
TflN 17.7152
L-taRC 35.3788
kHll I AL N 20 56 06.00 W
RP 8►;'9 . 2601Zi 1938.7108 12
11 CHORD S 72 49 14.00 int 35.3530 1079. k~14i7 1 t342. 9t3b4 13
TANC~PT S E9 0-1 54.00 W
13 IiVV S 904 40.00 E 149. 9900 930. 9343 18E6. 6:;01 14
11} INV S GJ 09 55.00 W 300. ::J60~ ~04. 698J 1:J93. 88'49 15
15 ! NV N 24 50 19.00 W 109. 9600 904. 4866 1 5,4'7. 694 % 16
16 I hJV N 28 14 47.00 W 35.0600 935.3717 1531.1021 17
17 I NV hl 2z► 50 19.00 W 1 10. 0000 1035.1961 1484. 8951 18
18 IIVV S 65 09 41.00 W 130.0000 980. 5878 13E6. 9208 19
19 I IVV S 60 36 02.00 W 45. 1 100 958. 4435 1327.6201 20
20 I h!V S 89 25 56.00 W 95.0900 957. 5012 1232.t5348 k"1
RAD I AL N 69 40 47.00 E:
DELTA 5 25 58. OOL'1'
RAll 1 US 342. 5000
TA1V 16. ~ 5 fil 1
L--AF2C 32.4758
RAD I AL N 64 14 49.00 E
RP 838.5621 911.3499 "
21 CHORD 1V 2; 02 12.00 W 32.4636 987.3760 1219.8311 i:~s
TAiV(tlFIT N 25 45 1 1. 00 W
23 I NV N 89 25 56.00 E 109. 8800 988.4649 1329.7057 2*4
24 I NV hl 1 12 48.00 E 71.971410 1060.4188 1331.2297 L'`_"b
,,25 I h!V hl 50 20 22.00 W 132.5000 1144.9853 1229. 2`6~.~ 26
2E► F IVV fV 12 20 03.00 E 58.3900 1►~'0`. 0`7E+ 1241.6989 c?
27 IIVV N 32 18 10.00 W 181. 41 00 1355.3618 1144.7546 28
28 I IVV N 66 24 24.00 E 345. :,81c10 1493. 67"l6 1461.4473 2 9
29 INV N 8O 41 38.00 E 39.0800 1499. 997:.' i;00. 0129 30
LAT & UEF, 0.0026 -0. 0i `9
30 HCL05E iV 77 38 37.78 W 0.0133 1500.0000 1500. 0000 1
PREC = 1 TQ 221820 Area 216333.39 sq ft 4.96633 ac
FROh1 ANGLE llTST IVC1F2T1-l EAST 10
BLOLK 2 S I DEL INES
AUTO INVERSE
S"E'ART 1500.0000 1;:.,00. 0000 1
L:
1 INV S 12 19 11.00 E 110.5900 1391. 95E6 15213.5962
` T N V S 84 18 44.00 W 1 ci tZ10 1389.% E+ f 4 I`r 01. 5553 3
3 INV S 1~=~ 19 11.00 E 1 17. 8400 1~74. C~3bO l5e6. 69A4 4
4 I hIV S 77 40 49.00 W 40.5700 12'65. ~787 1467. O6`6
J J 14 Y uJ ! I 'T V-- '7 J. W.- V., W d✓ V• •`4.• e.- Y..w• s t..iz„ --T • a v~ a.... . • E..r ~
RAD I AL N 12 19 11.00 W
DELTA 20 01 18. OOLT
RAll I US 167. 5000
`TAIV 29.5674
L.-Af2C 58.5319
RAD I AL 1V 32 20 29.00 W
RF' 1060.5117 1331.2955 32
31 CHGRD S 67 40 1 0. 00 W 58.2345 1202. 0284 1241. 689~ 33
TAN@F'1' S 57 39 31.00 LJ
33 I N V N 32 18 10.00 W 181. 41 00 1355.3627 1144.7449 34
34 IIVV iV 66 24 24.00 E 345. 58tc`)0 1493. 6;'&4 1461. 43`l6 35
35 I NV N 80 41 38.00 E 39.0800 i4'99. 9980 15010.0033 36
w .r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ° .d ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
L~T & r1E.P' 0.0020 -0. 00J.'.i
36 HCL(]SE N 58 56 59. tj8 W 0.0038 1500.0000 1500. 1Z10+zlo 1
PREC = 1 TCi 2E39830 Ar,ea =67621.47 sc; ft 1.55238 ac
FRC]M ANGLE UIS"I NORTH EASI' Tu
PLt]GK 2 R 3 SIDELI Ni~S
AUTG IIVVERSE -
5rAaT i i 24. ,--;i 7a itils. 0006 6
6 T hJV N 77 40 49.00 E 10.0000 1 126. 4514 1527.7705
i'
7 TiVV S 12 19 11.00 E 66.3400 1061. 6391 1541. 9:'t,3 8
$ IhlV N 65 09 55. Q10 E `62. 4900 1171.8855 1780.1410 9
9 T IVV N 78 23 35.00 E 82.4900 1188.4822 1 860. 9442 10
10 I iVV S 904 40.00 E 100.2500 1089. 4878 1876.7611 11
RADIAL N 13 23 26.00 W
DEI_Ta 11 26 39. OOLT
HpD T US 2E+7. 5000
TAN 26.8042
L--F1RC 53.4300
RAD I AL N 24 51D 05.00 W
RF=, 8`9. 2600 1938.7108 12
11 CNORD S '70 53 14.50 W 53. 341 2 10-72. 0225 1826.3602 37
TAEV@PT S 65 09 55.00 W
37 I EVV 5 65 09 55.00 W 325.3500 935.3748 1531.0976 ;L
38 I1dV N 24 50 19.00 W 1 10. 0000 1035.1992 1484.8906 39
39 I NV a 65 09 41.00 W 130. 0tl~00 980. 59Qt9 i a66. 91 b' 40
40 I hIV 8 E0 36 02.00 W 45.1100 958.4466 1327.61b6 41
41 I R!V S 89 25 56.00 W 95.0900 957.5043 12v2. 5,_;0::; 42
RAD I AL N 69 40 47.00 F
DELrI'A 5 25 58. OOLT
RAD T US 342'. 5000
'I"f4N 16.2501
L-ARC 32.4758
'
RADIAL IV E4 14 49.00 E
RP 838. 565L 911.3454 43
~ 42 CHORD iV 23 02 12.00 W 32.4636 987.3791 1219. 8266 44
"!"AN@P7 N 25 45 1 1. 00 W 44 I IVV hl 89 25 56.00 E 109. 8800 988. 46E30 1.=;29. 1012 45
45 I 1VV iV 112 48.00 E '71. 9700 1060. 4218 1331.2252 4E+
4E+ I IVV N 50 20 22.00 W 132.5000 1 144. 9884 1229.2215 47
RAD I AL iV 50 23 26.00 W
DEL.7A 38 04 1 5. 00Rl"
~ RAD I US 1 32. 5viOV.,
' TAh! 45.7150
= L-ARC 88. 041 1
~ RAD IAL hl 12 19 1 1. 00 W
'r RP 1060. 5129 1331.3006 48
~ 4? CHORD iV 58 33 41.50 E 86.4304 1 189. 9617 l303o 02y5 49
TAN@P'T N 77 40 49.00 E
49 I NV N 77 40 49.00 E 196. 0200 1►`'31. 7858 1494. 535€+ 50
50 INV a 12 19 1 1. 00 E 110. 0000 11 ~ 18 9 1`:, i8a otZr"~9 ;1
LAT ~,JOE1=' -0. 001 1 ' -0. 005i
v.. r...+..v v.~ v • r v.i vv r s~. v r... a a r r• v.r v + v+~z. z. L,. . ,
PREC: = 1'f r:1 ._,6761~ I%-lrea /4 sq i=t ~0 1~9y ;ac
FRt3M ANC7LE D IS"1' IVUFt`' 1 EASi 10
BLCJC:K 4 S T DEL 1 IVES
AU'TO TNVERSE
S°I AR'T' 930. 9343 1866.6501 14
14 I h{V '~''J E+5 09 .c.rJ. 00 I'J .300. JG00 B04. 69£35 1:J93. 8a49 15
15 I NV h! 24 50 19.00 4J 109.9600 ' 904. 4866 154`i'. 6947 16
lh IiVV iV 65 09 55. 00 E 323. 2E00 1040. 2,.'.,65 1841. 0607 b2
RAD I AL N 24 50 05.00 W
DELT'A 2 02 37. OOR'r
RFaU I U a 232.5000
TAN 4.1468
L-ARC 8.2928
RAD I AL iV 22 47 28.00 W
RP 8:'9. 2574 1938.7112 53
52 CMOhZD iV 66 11 1 3. 50 E 8.2923 1043. 6045 1848.6470 54
TAN@PT N 67 12 32.00 E -
54 I hiV S 904 40.00 E 114.1000 930.9336 1866.6492 55
LA"t R DE~' 0. 0007 0.0009
55 1ACLOSC N 52 04 40.26 E 0.0012 9130. 934s 1866. 6501` 14
FIREC = 1 TCl 733655 Area 34755.29 sc{ ft 0.79787 ac
FROM ANGLE D IST NURT H EAST 'TO
CEIV`!"ERL Ih1F R I VERWALK LANE
AUTO INVERSE
57ART 1265.9787 1487.0626 5
5 I iVV S 12 19 1 1. 00 E 17.5000 124t3. t3817 1490. 79E~ 56
56 I NV S 77 40 49.00 W 196. 0;w'00 1207.0576 1299. ~905 57
RAD T AL N 12 19 11.00 W
DELTA 27 04 41. OOLT
HA1D I US 150.0000
TAN 36.1199
L--ARC 70. 890`
RpDI AL N 39 23 52.00 W
FtP 1060.5117 1331.2955 58
57 CHORD S 64 08 28.50 W 70.2323 1176. 425v:, 1236.0904 59
TAN@PT S 50 36 08.00 W
59 I NV S 12 20 03.00 W 32.1800 1144.9882 1229.2163 E0
____________.~__--•---____.~____.._..._~------_...__________-------____w____.~___.._._______.._w_...__
LAT R DEF' 0.0001 0.0052
60 HCLOSE N 88 36 57.61 E 0.0052 1144.9884 1229.2215 4 l
FIREC = 1 TU 61346 iVo Ar°ea
1= ROM ANGLE D I ST iVORTH E.AST 'I"L'1
CEiVTERLINE SHAiVN01V LAh1E
AUTa INVERSE
5"CART 904. 486E+ 1 547. 6947 16
lE INV iV 28 14 47.00 W 17.5311 919. 9301 1539. 39'19 61
61 INV N 65 09 55.00 E 324. 3100 i+21`;60 14i0 1633. "%i67 62
RAD I AL N 24 50 05.00 W •
DLL7A 3 01 1 3. OOFcT
RAY7 I US 250. 0vJi~iO
T AN 6.5908
L--ARC 13.1784
kAD I AL IV 21 48 52.00 W
RP 829.2602 19:~8.717;-; 63
62 CHORD IV GH 40 31.50 E 13.1769 1061.3582 I845. 616t3 64
TAN@PT IV 68 11 08.00 E
64 INV S 904 40.00 E 17.9800 1043.6034 1848. 6536 6;
LAT & DEF, 0.0011 --0. 0066
65 I-ICLOSE iV 80 34 04.75 W 0.0066 1043.6045 1848.6470 54
PREC = 1 TU 56156 No Area
~
t ` lS '
FROh1 AhJGLE D I ST NOR i N EAS T 'T U
P141 j+.7 R I VERWAL...K 1 1'('H ARkA R I UERWALK l.,.WhJE .
AUTD INVERSE •
S'fART 1144.9884 1229.2215 47
RAD t AL iV i:23 26.00 W
DELTA 38 04 1 5. OORT
RAD i US 132.5000
TNN 45.7150
L--ARC 88.0411
KAD I AL hl 12 19 1 1. 00 W
RF=' . 10E0. 51`9 1 a3; 1. . 40 0 6 48
47 CHORD iV 58 38 41. vO E 66.4304 1169.9617 1 303. 01a'9~ 49
TARI@P7' N 77 40 49.00 E
49 I NV N 77 40 49.00 E 196..0200 1 231. 7858 1494.5356 50
50 I iVV IV 12 19 41.73 W 35.0000 1`6S. 9787 1467.0626 5
5 T NV S 77 40 49.00 W 196. 0200 1224. 1 546 1295.5566 31
RAD I AL N 12 19 1 1. 00 W
I7ELTA 20 01 18. OOLT _
Rfin I US 167. :~000
l'AiV 29.5674
L--ARC 58.5319
. RAI7 I AL IV 32 :0 29.00 W
RP 1060.5117 1331.2955 32
31 CHORD S 67 40 1 0. 00 W 58.2345 120w. 0~84 1241.6892 33
TAN@F,T S 57 39 31.00 W
33 I NV S 12 19 46.92 W 58.3867 1144.9884 1 L29.`2-1 5 47
l144.9684 12w9. :2i5 47
NO CLOSUhk ERROR Area = 9368.30 sq ft 0.21507 ac
FkOhi ANGLE D T ST NOFcTH EAST TO
qREA SHA1ViVOlV I_taNE
RUI'O I NVERSE
57RFt'f ' 9. Q1'72. 2+225 16`E. 3602 37
37 I tVV S 65 09 55.00 W 325. 35~`~0 935. 3148 1531. 09'76 38
38 T NV S 28 15 01.84 E 35.0648 • 904. 48E6 1547.6947 16
16 IhlV N 65 09 55.00 E 32s. `600, 1040.2565 1841. ~~07 .52
FcAU IAL tJ 24 50 05.00 W
DEL7A 2 02 37. OOf2T
F2AU I US L32. 50Qi0
l` AlV 4.1468
L--ARC 8.2926
RAD I AL N 22 47 28.00 W
RP 829. 25?4 1936.7112 5;
52 CHORD N 66 11 13.50 E 8.2923 1043.6045 184l3. 6470 b4
TA{V@F'l N 67 12 32.00 E
54 I iVV N 904 34. 1 3 W 35.8906 i079. 045`l 1842.9854 13
RAD I AL iV 20 58 06.00 W
DELTA a 51 59. OQ►LT - RAD T US ► 67. `,000 - "
YAN 9.0290
L-ARC 18. 0.51 2
KAD I AL N 24 50 05.00 W
RP 82y. `600 1938.7108 66
13 CHORD S 67 05 54.50 W 18.0478 10°72. 0225 1826.3602 6%
TAN@PT S 65 09 55.00 W 1072. 0225 1826.3602 37
iV0 GLOSURE EIRR(JR Area = 11812.72 sq ft 0.27118 ac