Loading...
24916 PE-1414K Page 3_of 3 Page 1 of 1 Rodney Pegram From: Rodney Pegram Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 9:59 AM To: 'Schoolcraft, Kerri' Subject: Riverwalk Commercial, PE-1414K Attachments: _0415094943_001.pdf Dear Kerri, Attached you will find a PDF of my acceptance letter for this project. The original will go out in today's mail. Thank you for your patience, Sincerely, Rodney D. Pegram Development Engineering Inspector 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 688-0025 Meg ram0-)sqokanevallev.orq 5/11/2009 Page 1 of 2 , I ' JZ Rodney Pegram From: Rodney Pegram Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 3:44 PM To: 'Todd Whipple' Subject: RE: Riverwalk Commercial, PE-1414K Todd, I need the record drawings and certification package on the commercial portion. Thanks, Rodney D. Pegram Development Engineering Inspector 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 688-0025 rpegram@spokanevalley.org From: Todd Whipple [mailto:twhipple@whipplece.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 2:54 PM To: Rodney Pegram Cc: 'Ben Goodmansen' Subject: FW: Riverwalk Commercial, PE-1414K Rod, Depends on which portion your interested in, the duplexes were CLC the commercial piece on the corner was WCE. Please advise. Todd R. Whipple, PE President Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc 2528 N. Sullivan Road Spokane Valley, WA 99216 p. 509.893.2617 f. 509.926.0227 c. 509.995.2939 email twhipple@whippleCE.com From: Ben Goodmansen [mailto:bgoodmansen@whipplece.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:07 AM To: Todd Whipple' 5/11/2009 Page 2 of 2 % - . Subject: FW: Riverwalk Commercial, PE-1414K Todd I wasn't involved in this project. Any ideas for Rod? Ben Goodmansen, E.I.T. Whipple Consulting Engineers (WCE) From: Rodney Pegram [mailto:rpegram@spokanevalley.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:00 AM To: Ben Goodmansen Subject: Riverwalk Commercial, PE-1414K Hi Ben, This project appears to have been designed in 2002 or earlier with Spokane County.l have a letter dated June 13, 2006 to Cliff I'Vlort, Neighborhood Inc., from John Hohman requesting a Certification Package and Record Drawings so that the project could be closed. I have not been able to locate these items as being submitted and I still have a surety in place. Whipple Consulting Engineers and CLC Associates both appear to have been involved with the project and I do not know who was going to submit the information noted. Could you help me with this as I would like closure. Thanks a lot-- Sincerely, Rodney D. Pegram Development Engineering Inspector 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 688-0025 rpegram@spokanevalley.org 5/11/2009 Page 1 of 1 Rodney Pegram From: Rodney Pegram Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 10:00 AM To: 'Ben Goodmansen' Subject: Riverwalk Commercial, PE-1414K Hi Ben, This project appears to have been designed in 2002 or earlier with Spokane County.l have a letter dated June 13, 2006 to Cliff Mort, Neighborhood Inc., from John Hohman requesting a Certification Package and Record Drawings so that the project could be closed. I have not been able to locate these items as being submitted and I still have a surety in place. Whipple Consulting Engineers and CLC Associates both appear to have been involved with the project and I do not know who was going to submit the information noted. Could you help me with this as I would like closure. Thanks a lot-- Sincerely, Rodney D. Pegram Development Engineering Inspector 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 688-0025 rpegram@spokanevalley.org 5/11/2009 . Page 1 of 2 Wayne McGavran From: Wayne McGavran Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:10 AM To: Alysa Wiyrick Cc: Henry Allen; John Hohman . Subject: Recommendations for PE 1414K, PE 1751 B, & PE 1206E Alysa, We reviewed the following three projects and listed below are our recommendations. ~ li - ~ 1 Allan and I visited this site on 3/22/06 and have the following list of concerns: 1. The driveway off Mission Avenue was not conshucted according to plan. 2. No pipe placed under driveway as shown on plan. 3. Drywell in swale along Mission Avenue not located according to plan. 4. Frame and grate for drywell not according to County Standards. 5. Fabric still in place at drywell frame and grate. There were no `Record Drawings' in the file and so can not confirm whether these changes were approved in advance. The file'contains a Letter of Credit in the amount of $61,000.00 which is held by Washington Trust Bank and was dated 3/12/03. No release was found in the files. WTB was contacted and the Letter of Credit is still in force. Recommendation: Request `Record Drawings' and project Certification be submitted. Have developer remove fabric and replace frame and grate on drywell with one meeting County Standards. Upon completion of these items, release bond and close project with no further action needed. PE-1751-B Midilome East 2"d Addition Allan and I visited tlus site on 3/22/06 and checked to see if corrections, as per John Hohman's letter dated 12/17/03 had been made. We noted that each item listed on the letter had indeed been done. We further field reviewed the project and found no other obvious areas of concern. A Letter of Credit, in the amount of $23,000.00 dated 1/21/03 with Washington Trust Bank was in the file. No release was found in the files. WTB was contacted and their records show that the Letter of Credit was no longer in force. . Recommendation: Consider this project closed. 3/23/2006 1 CLC A550CIATES November 26, 2002 RECEIVED W.O. No. S020317 NOV 27 20 Spokane County SPOKANE COUNIY ENGINEER Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Attn: Gary Nyberg, Development Services Re: Mission Avenue Improvement Plans Riverwalk Commercial P-1414K Dear Gary, In response to your fax dated 11-19-02 I've enclosed the following to help on the Mission Avenue issues. • Letter highlighting to the Sponsor that the latest conditions are good through July 1 St, 2003. • Current Set of Conditions with the July 1 St, 2003 date highlighted. • A detail for the revised sidewalk location at Harmony and Mission. As a sidelight this was changed because the homebuilder built the house in the wrong location and we/they had to get a variance which resulted in the sidewalk being moved. • A copy of the Mission Avenue plans from Riverwalk 7th Addition, which matched the plans from Riverwalk - Phase 1. • A copy of the Barker Road Improvements, which were also completed as a part of the Riverwalk 7th Addition. Hopefully these items will assist you in your evaluation of this project. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call at 458-6840. Sincer ly, CLC ssociat s - , d R. Whipple, P.E. Principal Enclosures as noted Cc: File 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE • SUITE 200 • SPOKANE • WA 99204 • P 509 458 6840 • F 509 458 6844 DENVER 9 SPOKANE 9 SALT LAKE CITY ea/eb/11Jb2 14:21 2084578043 CRESCENT MONOGRAM HM PAGE 02 - r. ~ ; ` ~•1, . i . , . . ~ . July 26,2002 CLC ASSOC{ATES Cliff MOrt a;d,l .I ~1.II ~~~''j• 565 Greenferry Road Post Falls. ldaho 83854 RE: Proposal for Professionai Services R(verwalk Commercial Slte at NE comer of Batlcer Road and Mission Avenus, Spokane County, Washington Dear Cliff: CLC Associates appreciate -the opportunity to provide you with this propasal for professional services for the proJect reterenced above. 3cope of Work: Site englneering, final p}atting and construction staking for the project based upan our understanding of the required soope and processing requirements for Spokane County, Washington. Slta Location: 7he project is located north and east of the intersection of Barker Road and Mission Avenue in Spokane, Washington. Project Descrlptiott: This project is a portion of the approved preliminary plat that explres on Juty 1, 2003. The site Is approximately 9.11 acres. The remainder of the preliminary plat has been finalized or is in the final stages of being oompleted as a final plat of residential lois. The site is currently zoned a Conditional Use B-2. Speclal Conditions and LlmltaUons: The services proposed are based upon the existing conditfons of the surrounding roadways and utilities, and as associated with the required roadway improvements as stated in th Co 'tions of ~ oval dated June 1, 2000 (Attached). The Conditions apply until the expiration i " y The worlc shall be divided into the following generaf parts: PART A - SURVEYINC SERVICES 707 wE9T 7Th1 AVENUE • sUtTE 200 • 9POKANE • wA 91PZ04 • P 509 456 69340 . F 509 456 6844 O oENVER - dPOKANE • sqLT LAKE CITY 08/06/02 TUE 14:15 [TX/RX NO 74071 . - , . ~ ` . • • ~ ~ s . ` N bvl ~ . . : . ~ ~ ~ . ~ : w , . . ~ ~o W : : z . 1 ` . I . ~ ~ . , I ' : 12' 1 . • I . 12' ~ ' : V' S~ t o~ TRAFFIC TRA . ~ TRAFFIC ' ' • Z . 7 ~ : ( ; ~ 1 ~ O ' ~ . , I . ~ . ' I ~ . ~ ....~.~~....~~..t - - , ' I ' . : I ~ ` ~ ; I : SOUTH SIDE OF EXIST. HOUSE} . _ ~ ~ ; ( . I p STALL 5 COh ~ 5" COMPACTED CLK (SIDEWALK, SLOPE, FACE OF CURB . I EELCHAIR _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONTAININ~ . X ~ ~ CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO DRAINAGE . TO FENCE . , ( ) P COMPACTED i UTILITY ESMT.) ~ . + )MPACTED CRUSHED SUF ~ ACC01 . ~ ~ ~ P ACCORDANCE WITH x ~ ~ ~ ~ tD ~ ~ . . ~ . :y,,,,.- . ~ y..~ ~ , ~ . N N - - I "r " - . . I IN SETBACK ~y/ • BU LD G / ~ ~ » EXIST. 4 Ca AR FUTURE ACQUISITION EA) CIST. 4" COMPACTED CLA ~ .s . . CONTAININ( ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ,r ' r i ~ CONTAlNING 5 3/4% TO rL A nA nrrr% • nr% 5 A r~I I e-n nA 'M`r `If -j .A M 11 ~ g R~ V , / / ~ COI~PACTED ~ ~ ~ACCC •r 1 l~.~'~ tt F~ ` t ir~ ~~iti- _ - ' - • . -ACCORDANCE WITH ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ' ~ NEW RIGHT OF WAY . 0 OLD RIGHT OF wAY) N . ~ C . . . . ~ ~ TO STA. 1511 ~ N r _ - - T AD D ITI 0 N_ ~ ~ ~ r1T ~ Z Dt r1r`t~ 1 CIr1C1AlAI I! DC111 ((`I~II►A~I~IT -w IT . , ^ s ' ^ D ' BEFOI2E THE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING ~(v ZN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION OF ) ) 1~'J TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1414-81/ ` PUDE-1-82 / ZE_92-81, ) FINDINGS OT FACT, RI'VERWALK, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND PItE LIMINARY PLAT, PL,ANNED UNIT ) bECYSION v DEVELOPMENT AND ZONE ) RECLASSIFICATION ) THIS MAT7'ER, a request for an extension of time from C& L Development, LLC Iias been received and decided upon, pursuant to the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (Section 12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140. FINDINGS 4F FACT 1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated tlie responsibility for rendering this decision by tlie Spokane Cotinty Director of Building and Planning, 2. The original development proposal was to sttbdivide approximately 118 acres into 364 lol~g for manufactured homes, single family residences anci a siqle commercial lot. The original proposal also included a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Residential Manufactured Home (RMH) witli a Planned Unit Developmeiit (PUD) Overlay zone and to Coanmercial (C) tinder tlle now expired, Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. ' 3. The subject preliminary plat, 2one reciassification and Plaiined Unit Development (PUD) were approved by tlie Hearing Examiner Committee on Apri12, 198,2. The revised preliminary plat and PUD were approved on JLine 16, 1995. 4. The existing zoning of t(ie property described in tlle application is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR- 3.5) previously establislled as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1957 (ZE-286-57) and redesignated to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to lmplement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the proposed Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone. 5. Spokane County has establislied specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the . expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordi►iance and have been used as a basis for this decision. Section 12.100.116 states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision, (arge lot subdivisions, shoi-t subdivisions, and bindins site plans shall automatically expire five years after preiiminary approval is granted unless z time exreiisioii is approved for the project." and Section I2..100.1 18 follows with "The Director may administratively approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditioiis which wouid reiider filins of the plat or bindiiig site p!a» contrary to the public health, safety a• general welfare, and fiirlher provided oiie or moi•e of the tollowing circumstances is found to apply:" The following are the relevailt sections of Section 12.100.1 18 and the Division of Plaiiiiing responses. Planneng response: I. That some portion of tlie existing preliminary siibdivision or biilding site plan lias been finalized since the project was approved and the remainiiig lots would form a unified development consistent witll the original approval; RESPONSE: The Iast extension of tiiite was approved May 19, 1999 and ten phases of tlle prelii»iiiary plat Iiave been .finalized since the preliminary plat was originally approved. Riverwalk First Addition Riverwalk Second Addition Riverwalk Tliird Adcfition RiverwAlk Fourth Additioii Riverwalk Fiftll Addition Riverwalk Sixth Addition Riverwalk Seventh Additioii - , , Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 2 Riverwalk Eiglitli Addition Ttiverwalk Ninth Addition Riverwalk Tenth Addition 2. That the preliminary silbdivision, short subdivision, or binditlg site plan remains generaily consistent witli original plat or binding site plaii that was approved, and tlle sponsor lias taken substantial steps toward fina(izing the piat or binding site plan, wliicli sliall include one, bllt IS 110t limited to, tlie following: RESPONSE: The proposed preliminary plat remains consistent witli the original preliminary plat tllat was approved. Riverwalk First tlirougll Riverwalk Tentli Additions are coiistructed and cornprise approxinlately 347 of the original 365 (ots approved. ~ 2. a) surveying the lots within the development; b) arranging for public services to the site; c) obtaining necessary financing for all or a portiori of the preliminary subdivision, sliort subdivision, or binding site plan; d) the completion of studies or other requiremejits whicli were part of preliminary subdivision, sliort subdivision, or binding site plan approval; RESPONSE: The completioiZ of 10 of the 13 phases/divisioiis of the original preliminary plat have provided all of the iilfrasiructtcre necessary to complete the development. 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned tipon the extension of public services whicll are not yet available. Tllis provision sliall not apply to public utility extensions wliicli the project sponsor would iioi'I11AII)/ fUI1CI. RESPONSE: NA 4. That admiiiistrative delays liave caused tlie inability of the applicant to finalize the plat witliiri the five (5) year time period. RESPONSE: Tlie applicant identifies no administrative delays Iiaving delayed tlie finalization of tlie plat. 6. The Comprehensive PIc111 designates the area of the preliminary plat as Urban. The . Comprehensive P11n designation remains the same since the origiiial preliminary plat approval. 7. New conditions imposed through the review of this request for an extension of time begin on page #9. No additional conditions liave been recommended by the Spokane Regional Healtfl District, the Spoklne County Divisiorl of Utilities, or the Spokane County Division of [3uildinb. 8. This is the teiith (lOth) request for a time exteilsion. The total life of the preliminary plat lias been approximately nineteen (19) years. 9. The applicant/owner should sliow contiiiued progress toward complyiiig with Section 12.100.118, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time. [iASED UPON A REV]EW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Fin iz. - c, an extension of time re uest for application PE- 1414-8 1, Riverwalk, is herebyAPPROVED t.or ORIGIANAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Those previous conditions of approva) specified in the Spokane County Planning Division's Findings of Fact, Conclusion and 4rder dated June 16, 1995, are recited liere as fo!lows: (modrfications to the original conditiorrs nre ilalicizea) SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DIVJSION l. All conditions imposed by the F-fearing Examiiier Comrnittee and all time extension conditions, as amended or upolted, shall be binding on the "Apnlicant." The term "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of tlie property, lieirs, assisns and successors. f . Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 3 Additional Extensions of Time shall not be granted unless substantial compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of tlle Subdivision Ordinance is deinonstrated by tlle applicant; otlierwise tlie preliminary subdivision and the preliminary planned unit development approval will become iiull and void. 4. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3. and #4.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Site Developrnent Plaii (PUD) of "RIVERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," has been administratively approved sliall be the official preliminary plat of record and shall be the Preliminary Planned Unit Developmeiit. This May 19, 1995 revised plan includes 9.11 acres for a proposed commercial lot and 107.3 acres for a proposed planned unit development (FM), being a total of 116.41 acres (see said plan map). The PUD proposes 365 ~ single family lots. At the time of each Final PUD site developinetit plaii and Final Plat is submitted for eacli phase they sliall comply witli all developinent standards for tlle approved zone classifications, including the Planned Unit Development Overlay Zone, all as ameiided. (see 9. below) Note, at this point in ticne, no part of the preliminary plat/PUD have been finalized since the original 1982 approval. 5. (Amend 8!5/93 Planning Condition #34.) The above May 19, 1995 revised plan allows developmeiit phases. These phases may be administratively amended if tlle variotis agencies find that eacli proposed pliase will provide proper traffic circulation, provide adequnte emergency vehicle access, meet iiecessary utilities design and/or utility circulation requirements, and provide for the public Iiealth and safety. 6. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) The "Revised Preliminary Plat and Prelii»inary Site Development Plan (PUD) of RiVERWALK" stamped "Received May 19, 1995," now replaces: (1) the "Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated November 12,1981, as approved by tlle Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 2, 1982, which consisted of 365 manufactured home lots and I commercial parcel and (2) the "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record" map dated March 15, 1983, as approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee in tlle Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, wllicli was a redesign of the 50.2 acre Soutli portion (S It2) witli 178 lots, excluding tlle commercial parcel. This S 1/2 also being the Fina) PUD Site Development Plaii approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee in the Findings of Fact, Conclusions, and Decision dated April 14, 1983, is now NULL and VOID and is replaced witli tlie above May 19, 1995, preliminary platJPUD. Note, since tlle final plat for Phase 1 was submitted before tlie decision to approve tlle May 19, 1995, Revised Plan, Pliase 1 may be fittalized under the provisions of tlie April 14, 1983, Fin11 PUD, S I/2. 7. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #3.) A"Final PUD Site Development Plan" must be submitted ailci ~ approved for at least tlie area of eac11 proposed final plat prior to recording any Final Plat, otlier tlian Phase 1. This includes the S 1/2 of RIVERWALK (previously Riverway Villa). Each "C'iiial PUD" must substantially conform to the above May 19, 1995, revised preliminary plat/PUD and coi»ply with the applicable developmeilt standards existing at the time of submittal. 8. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #4, and 6.) The apprvved zone change, ZE-92-8 l, shall be ainended pursuant the PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. Tlie project area approved for the old approved Residential Mobil Home (RMH) Zone witll tile old PUD Overlay Zone shall be substituted with the present Urbail Residential-7 (UR-7) Zone and the present PUD Overlly Zone. The nroiect area aqproved for old Commercial (C) Zoile shall be substitpt,~~ ,+^rPCP~If rnmn~nitv Business (B-2) Zone. The existing UR-3.5 Zone shall be reclassified as eacli pliase of the development is recorded1s a Final Plat with tlie County Auditor. Tlle ' ' reclassification sliall be consistent witli tlie proposed zoning approved witli the preliminary plat of record, as amended by tlie PROGRAM TO IMPLEMENT. 9. (Amend 8/5/93 Plnnning Condition #7 aild # 1 l.) The final plat(s) sliall be designed substantially in conformance witli the above "Revised Preliminary Plat of Record date stamped May 1-9, 1995." No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a cliange of condition application submittal and approval. Eacli Final Plat sliall comply witfl the current development standards of tlie Urban Resideiitial-7 (UR-7) Zone and tlie Planiied Unit Development (PUD) Overlay Zone, as each may be ameiided. The nm~~?d cnmmercial narce sia comnlv witl, tl,e c«rrent develonment standards of the rt,ommLi,nity RLSiness (8-2) Zone as amended. Tlie entire site sliall also comply witli the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) overlay zoiie. 10. The Planning Director/designee sliall review any proposed final plat and final Planiied Unit Development Plan to ensure coi»pliance willi these findings and Conditions of Approval. 11. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #5.) , • Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 4 Prior to recordins a final plat which includes the commercial parcel, Spokane County shal(: a. insure that the commercial site is in compliance witli the development standards of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended, b. insure tliat the commercial site is i« compliance with the developinent standards of the Spokane N_..;County Road Standards, as amended, and c. insure tllat cornmercial uses do not exceed tliose of "neigliborfiood" and "local serving" type retail or service(s). 12. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition 45.) Prior to issuiq any building permits on the commercial parcel, a specific site devefopment plan (all or part) shall be submitted to Spokane County. The specitic site development plan wil( be circulated for comments from appropriate agencies to determine compliance with current regulations and for substantiai compliance with tlie- approved M1y 19,1995, revised Plan and the coiiditioiis of approval. 13. A final plat name/number shall be proposed before the final plat is filed, such ilame/number to be approved by the Planning Director/desisiiee. 14. Prior to filitig of the final plat, the appropriate street address(es) sliall be indicated. 15. Appropriate road name(s) sliall be indicated. 16. Tlie final piat map sliall indicate by a clear, daslied liiie the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication sliall coiitain the following staternelit: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks sliall be determined at tlie tiine building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied frorn if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 1 17. The final plat sliall indicate yard setback arc lengtlis on cu(-de-sac lots whicli meet or exceed tlie minimtim frontase of the underlying zone or the final plat. 18. Appropriate utility easerneilts sliall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Wr;tten approval of utility easements by approprilte utility compa»ies siiall be received witli tlie scibrnittal of the fi«al plat. 19. Four (4) current certificates of title shal) be fiirnished to Spokane County Planning prior to filins the final p(at. 20. Prior to filing of a11 or a portioji of tlle final plat, tlie applicant's surveyor sliall subinit oile or more maps oiitlined in red of the area being finalized. Tlie scale slial) matcli tlle appropriate assessor's map scale. . 21. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE specifying a fiiture lcind acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice may be released, in full or in part, only by Spokane County Planning. The Notice should be recorded within tlie same titne frame as tlie recordiiig of the Final Plat and sliall provide the following, if applicable: a. At least 10 feet alone Mission Avenue aiid 5 feet along Barker Road sliall be designated as reserved fztire acauisition ~r,, f9r road riaht•of-wav and utilities. in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated riglit-of-way along Mission Avenue and Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer lias required 10 feet of dedication along Mission Avenue and 15 feet of dedication along Barker Road. . b. Future building and otlier setbacks required by the Spokane Couilty Zoning Code sliall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required (andscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs sliould be located within the future acRuisition area for road right-or-way~and utilities. If any of the above iinprovements a're made within this area, tlley s ial1'tie relocated at the anplicaiit's expense when roadway improvements are made. , . . • • , • , • . , Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 5 d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as ai(owed in the zone, except that any improvements (sucli as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or otiiers) sliall be considered interim uses. e. Tlie property owner sliall be responsib(e for re(ocating sucll "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 22. Spokane County Planning shall prepare and record witli the Spokane County Auditor a TITLE NOTICE noting that tlie property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This TITLE NOTICE sliall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting tlle property in question. Tlle notice sliouid be recorded witliin the same time frame as the recording of the final Plat and shall only be released, in full or in part, by Spokane County Planning. The Title Notice sliall geiierally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ J, imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in Spokane County Planning. . 23. Tlle plat dedication sliall contain tfle following statement for tllose Iots located oi1 a cul-de-sac/stub road: • Lot(s) . Block(s) are located on 1 temporary cul-de-saclstub road. Tllis cul-de-sac/stub road may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or coiinect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circtilatioii needs dictate. 24. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service aiid fire protection sliall be approved by tlle water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, tllat the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certifccatioii sliall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat spollsor. 25. The .water purveyor siiall certify that appropriate contractua) arrangements and scliedule of improvements liave been made with tlle p(at sponsor for construction of the water system ir1 -iccordlnce witli the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate Iiealtli autliorities prior to application for building permits within tlie frnal plat. The arrangements or agreements sliall include a provision Iiolding Spokane County and tlle purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a buildiiig permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactority compiete tlie approved water system. 26. The final plat dedication sliall contain tlie following statement: Tlle public water system, pLirsuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state liealth authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, siiall be installed witliin tllis subdivision; aiid the applicant shatl provide for individual domestic water service as we(I as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for eacll lot. 27. No buildins permit will be issued for any fot witliin the final plat unti) certified by a Washi»gton state- licensed engineer thlt "the water syscem has beeii instalied pursuaiit to the approved Water Plati ior the final plat, " including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the fon-n of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of tlle Water Plan as a scllematic i-nap sllowins tlle "as-built" water system. 28 . Tlle Water Plan and tlle above conditions of approval resarding tlie Water Plan rnay be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and f re protection district stating tliat simple connections to an existing, approved water system wif I provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to etisure the public Iiealtli, safety and general welfare. 29. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 30. Approval is required by the Planniiig Director/designee of a specific Iigliting aiid signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 31. Direct ligllt from any exterior area lighting fixture sliall not extend over tlie property boundary. 32. A specific landscape p1an, pfanting sclledule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to t(le Planning Director/desisnee shzll be submitted with a performance boiid for the project prior to release of . . , • . Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 6 building permits. Landscaping sliall be installed and maintained so that sig(lt distance at access points is not obsctlred or impaired. 33. (Amend 8/5/93 Planning Condition #29.) The Final PUD site development plan sliall indicate all exterior boundary setbacks, as well as setbacks from roadtivays and individual lot lines. 34. A copy of tlie homeowners/property owners' association articles of incorporation and/or by-laws and/or covenants and restrictions, together witli any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to Spokane County Pfannins prior to finalizing. 35. Tlle owner/applicant siiall coordinate witli the local Fire District and the Fire Marsliall to insure that adequate access is provided for emergcncy services, prior to submitting each . Final Plat pliase. 36. Eac1i final plat dedication sliall make reference to the Home Owners Association agreemeiits as a notice to potential lot purcliaser of tlie responsibilities of lot owiiersliip witliin the subdivision. 37. The lots or common open space shown oii the May 19, 1995, Revised Preliminary Pfat that are within the 200 foot Shoreline boundary are required to comply witli the Spokane County Shoreline Prosram regufation. The Final Plat shall show the 200 foot shoreline boundary. Each lot which includes the 200 foot boundary must have a buiidable site that meets al1 reqtiired setbacks (botli zoiiing and shoreli»es) before it is recorded as a Fina( Plat. Notes (at least 2) sliall be placed on the Final Plan drawing near tlie affected lots and common open space which state; "The property witli the 200 foot Shoreline boundary has legal liinitations on tlie use of this land pursuant vegetation and building of structures, including fences." 38. If a Final Plat is recorded witli any (ot partially witliin the 200 foot boundary of the Shoreliiie, a TITLE NOTICE shall be recorded by Spokane County Planning immediately after recording tlle Final Plat witll the County Auditor. The TITLE NOTICE shall include a statement similar to: "Any lot's property or common open space property witliin tlie 200 foot slioreline boLindary Iiave • limitations on building structures (including fences) and clianging the natural vegetation pursuant tlie Spokane County Shoreline Program Regulations." 39. After the commercial parcel is granted B-2 Zoning with the recording of a Final Plat, the applicant/owner should make application for a Binding Site Plan to allow for timely division aiid sale of portions of the commerciai site after a Final Biilding Site Plan is recorded. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISIC?N OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance of a Buildine Permit Or Use Of Tlie Propertv As Prooosed: 1. All previotisly imposed conditions are still applicable. 2. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a PRiNCIPLE Arterial and i'~ i,a, i~ ^s"'I, i he existing riglit-of-way widths are not consistent with t~hose speciFie 'i ~'i~e t. implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the rec~uired right-of-wly dedication, _WW a strip 5 feet in width along Barker Road a ~ vic I~ ~1,~•~. • ,~ion u~ 'l b_~a i. This property may be acquired o ane County aie tiiiie wheii ai eria improvements are m~~ to Barker Road and Mission Avenue. 3. As per the original conditions of approval: ~"A traffic analysis of eacli phase wilf be required of the developer and reviewed by Spokane County ~ prior to plat finalization. Tllis anal ysis will be coordinated witli tlle S ta te o f Was liinston Departmetit o f Transportation. A traffic analysis for eacll pllase will serve as a basis for tlie evaluation of t(1e need for traffic control devices at Barker Road and Mission Avenue. Sllould the analysis determine a need for tRterSeCtiOR upgrading, the developer will be assessed a proportionate sliare for (Ile required improvements. 4. Prior to any plat checking of Riverway Villa for pliased finalization of tlle p(at t(le aforementioned analysis sliall be co►npleted. . . • ~ Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414•81 Page 7 5. 1rltersection and road improvemeiits slial) be constructed and pliased as follows predicated on an . agreement reaclied on or about August 4, 1994, between Nortli Idalio Engineering and the Spokane County Engineer. Barker Road: Pliase I: Construct Barkerllndiana intersection (Barker Road to be a 5-lane section per the County's Specia) section for Barker Road). Provide acceleration/deceleration lanes (sized per WSDOT Design manua!), as well as inbound and outbound tapers. Pilase II: Construct Barker Road north to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, uriless built out sooner as part of Phase VI. Phase VI: Construct Backer Road nortli to the Spokane River, and south to Mission Avenue, Linless built out sooner as part of Phase II. ' I: Construct Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Construct »ortlt 'o ~Id"~ enue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) from Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) to Barker. Provide inbound taper to Clark Fork (Harmony Lane) intersection. Phase III: Construct Mission/Potomac and Mission/Yukon intersections. Construct nortll side of Mission Avenue (per the County's Special Section for Mission Avenue) along the Mission Avenue frontage from the easterly plat boundary to Mission/Clark Fork (Harmony Lane). Provide inbound taper to the widened Mission/Yukon intersection from east of the easterly plat boundary. 6. Conditions of Approvat require that Barker Road and Mission Avenue improvements adjacent to Phase VI are to be completed prior to issuance of a building permit for any projects on tliat parcel. 7. The aforementioned phasing is a minimum development program. Changes to this constructioil scliedule may be itnplemented pending completion of the Traffic Impact Analysis for eacli pliase of the development. 8. E»gineers Condition #21 of April 2, 1982 Hearing Exarniner Committee Findings and Order required that a strip of property 15 feet in widtll along Barker Road be dedicated from Mission Avenue to the Spokane River. Since a portion of this strip is not controlled by the applicailt this requirement for dedication is not applicable. Riglit-of-way along Barker Road witllin the original approved plat s(iall be dedicated at the time of final plat approval or vesting of any cominercial rezone. Improveiretits to Barker Road from the Spokane River bridge on Barker to Mission Ave. shall still be required with the existiiig riglit-of-way per a pliasing plan to be agreed to by tlie developer and approved by the County Engineer. 9. Regarding the May 19, 1995, redesigii Plan the following condition shall apply; (1) Temporary cul-de-sacs shall be constructed at the terminus of Indianl Avenue, Tippi ,Canoe Lane cannot be used as a public road turn-around and all other streets that provide access to more than one lot shall also provide an acceptable turn-around. (2) Improvements to proposed roadwzys sha!l be as outlined in the approvecf conditions of approval or as amended by the overali traffic analysis currently being completed. SP4KANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance witli the Coordiiiated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. The dedication sliall state: The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to autliorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 365.94 which tlie petition inciudes t(le Owner(s) property and furtller not to object by signing of a protest petition against tlle formation' of a UL1D by resolution metliod Pursuant to RCW 36.94 wliicll includes tlle Owner(s) property. Provided, this condition s(iall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of iinprovements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by eitlier petition or resolution under RCW 36.94. 3. Applicant will make connection to Aub(ic Sewer System. Sewer Con-nection Permit is reqtiired. 4. Plans and specifcations for the public facilities are to be reviewed and approved by tlle Utifities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. 5. Tlie dedication sliall state: , : • • Extension of Time Findings Fife No. PE-1414-81 Page 8 "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for tlle forrnation of ULID by petition metllod pursuant to RCW 36.94, wliicli petition includes the owner(s)' property; and fiirtlier liot to object by tlie signing of a protest petition against tlle formation of a ULID by resolution metllod pursuant to RCW Cliapter 36.94 wliicli incltides the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition sliall not proliibit the owner(s) or successor(s) fro►n objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjuilction witli the formation of a ULID by eitlier petition or resolution metliod under RCW Cllapter 36.94. 6. Aiiy water service for this project shall be provided in accordance witlt tlle Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amendecl. 7. Applicant sliall mlke connection to public sewer system. Sewer connection permit is required. Plans and specifications are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Departmeiit. SPOICANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to tlie effect that: "A public sewer systern will be made available for the plat and individtial service will be provided to eacli lot prior to sa[e. Use of iildividual on-site sewage disposal systems sliatl not be autliorized. " 2. The final plat shall be designed As indicated on tlie prelirninary plat of record aiid/or any attaclied slieets as noted. 3. Appropriate utility easements sliall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by Spokane County P(anning to the utiiity companies, Spokane Courity Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easecnents by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of tlie final plat. 4. Sewage disposal metliod sliall be as authorized by tlie Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service sliall be coordinated tlirougli tlle Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 6. Water service sliall be by an existing public water supply wllen approved by tlle Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of f-Iealth. .7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to tlie satisfaction of the Spolcane County Healtli Disirict that an adequate and potable water supply is available to eacli lot of tlle plat. 8. Prior to filing tlie flnal plat, the sponsor sliall present evideiice that tlle plat lies witliin the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 9. A plan foc water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use sliall be approved by tlle water purveyor. Said water plan must liave been approved by the fl re protection district and the appropriate healtli authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, oii the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requiremeiits and will adequate(y satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 10. The pucveyor will also certify prior to filing tlte fina( plat on a copy of said water plan tliat appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of tlle water systen,, in accordance witli the approved plan and time sclledule. The time scliedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate liealtli authorities prior to application for building perrnits within the piat.-The contractual arrangements wil) include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health District and tlle purveyor harmless from claims by any lodtract pucchaser refiised a biiilding permit due to failure of the plat spoilsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. , 11. The dedicatory language on tlle plat shaf I state: "Use of private wells and water syste►ns is proliibited." 12. The flnal plat dedication shall contain tlle following statement: The public water system, pursuant to tlie water plan approved by county and state liealtli autliorities, tlie local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, sliall be installed witliin tliis subdivision and the ~ . 1 . . ♦ s , ' r'~ • ~1, Extension of Time Findings . File No. PE-1414-81 Page 9 applicant sliall provide for individual domestic water service as weil as fire protection to eacli (ot/tract prior to sale of each lot/tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements adm in i stered/en forced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: ADDRESSING, FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS; FIR.E HYDRANT/FLOW; APPROVED WATER SYSTEMS; BUILDING ACCESSIBILITY; CONSTRUCTION TYPE; OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATI0NEXITING; EXTERIOR WALL PROTECTION; AND ENERGY CODE REGULATIONS. (Note: TI1e Division of Buildings reserves t1le right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PRiOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY FINAL PLAT: . . 1. A traffic analysis slial( be prepared for tlie Barker Road interchznge and sliall contain the followiiig elements: a. Site Map (illustratins the complete circulation system) b. Vicinity Map(s) (illustrating traffic distributio») c. Existing Transportation Conditions 1. Existing average daily traffic 2. Existing AM and PM peak liour level of service 3. Existing AM and PM peak hour turning movements d. Projected Transportation Conditions wifh this Development _ 1. Projected Average Daily Traffic 2. Projected AM and PM peak hoiir level of service 3. Projected AM and PM peak Iiour turning movements e. Recommended mitigating ineasures . 1. tvlitigating measzires sufficient to maintain existing Level of Service "D" 2. If the existing Level of Service "D" cannot be rnaintai►ied a justification sliould be included NOTE: Tlie ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual (Stii .Edition) sliall be used as a basis to compute trip generation rates of tlle proposed developments. 2. That the applicant agree to fund and construct the necessary mitigating measures as outliiied in the -ibove traffic study. These mitigating measures must be approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County Cngineers prior to tlle issuance of aily buildiilg permits for this property. 3. Due to the trip generation potential, any firrther development oiher than what is proposed wil) require fiirtller review by WSDOT to assure ldditional trips are safely accoiilmodated. Wh rever t ie "New Conditions of Approval" replicate or conflict wit 1(ie prior existing conditions of Approval recited above, the "New Conditions of Approval" shall be controlling and shall amend and/or replace the terms and intent of the original conditions. SPOI{ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING l. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots, or stibstantial modifications to the preliminary plat slia(1 occur without a change of conditiori application stibmittal and approval. Pliased approv.al of tlie final plat is allowed but must be approved by the Division of Planning and otlier agencies who sign the final plat. 2. Prior.to recording of any fiiial plat, the sponsor sliall provide written approval of tlle final piat design from the Nortiiwestern Pipeline Corporation. . Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 10 3. A specific landscape plan, planting scliediile and provisions for the maintenance acceptable to tlle Director of the Division of Planning/designee sliall be submitted with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee for tile project prior to release of aiiy building permits. Lajidscaping sliall be installed and maintained so that siglit distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 4. The preliminary plat is given caiditional approval for tliree (3) years,~ t~l~i~q■ho~d ~Of~, The applicant may submit an 11 extension of time application at least tllirty (30) days prior to tlle above expiration date but no later than M%311MWOM. Application(s) for extensioii of time sliall be processed under tlie provisions of Cliapter 12.100.118 (Extension of Time) of tlle Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, as amended. lf the applicant complies with the criteria of Chapter 12.100.118, the preliminary approval and conditions wili be clianged to reflect tlle adopted policy and development regulations at the time of the extension application. 5. Subsequent extensions of time will only be considered upon a finding of substaiitial compliance with Section 12.100.118 of the Spokatie County Subdivision Ordinance as amended. Otherwise tlie preliminary plat will become null aiid void. 6. Prior to filing al[ or a portion of the finai plat the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or i1ioi-e maps outlined in red of tlle area being fi»alized atld those portions/phases tliat liave received firtal plat approval. The scale sliall rnatcli tlle appropriate assessor's map scale. 7. The Spokane County Critical Area maps indicates the preliminary plat is located witliin a seo- hazardous area. The Spo(cane County Soil Survey identifies Ulilig Variant Silt Loarn soils oii site which are identified by tlle Spokane Couilty Critical Areas Ordinance as liaving the potential for severe erosion. Prior to any final plat review or approval, tlle applicant sliall submit apreliirinary =o-hazard evaluatioi - i for review aiid possible approva) by t>>`'e tivisions of Planning, Engineering and Utilities. tt may be found, upon review of the preliminary geo-liazard evaluation, that a more in deptli study is required to assure the potential for erosion is addressed and mitigated appropriately. 8. The dedication for the final plat shall state, "The land encompassed within the boundaries of the final plat contain geo•liazardous areas, specifically Ulllig variant silt loam. soils. Tliis soil type is identified as having the potential for severe erosion. Thase mitigating measures identified in [name of the author of tlie approved preliminary geo-Iiazard evaluation and date of said report] shall be met prior to ihe issuarice of any building permit. Land use activity within the geo- liazardous areas sliall be as regulated by the Spokane County critical areas ordinance, as amended". SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING Prior to retease of u buitding permit or use of nroperty as proposecl: 1. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Wasllington, sliall stibmit final road and draiiiage plans, a drainage report aiid road and drainage calculatioiis that coiiform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for Road aiid Sewer Constriiction aiid the currejit edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Manageiileiit. Final road and drainabe pJans slilll also comply witli all applicable state aiid federa( (aws that may be applicable to tllis project. Final road and drainage plans, related calculations aiid a drainase report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a conshruction or building peri»it or approval of fllC flllil) plat. Foflowing plan acceptance by tlie Spoka»e Couilty Engineer, drainage language will be drafted by Spokane Couilty aiid provided to tlie Sponsor's Eiigineer or Scirveyor foc• i»cl«sioii witli the fina( plat document. 2. If the project is phased aiid one phase depends on another phase for access and/or drainage treatment and disposal, the prior pliase sliall be completed and certified prior to the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads will not be released uiitil the subject phase is completed, certified aiid accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a iion certified and non-accepted pliase of the development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for construction uilless tlle prior pliase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer. 3. As per Section 9.14.080 of the Spokane County Code, no person s(iall construct a road or otller , . facilities witliin the existins proposed, or future public riglit-of-way, or the private road easement in connection with the actions enuinerated in Section 9.14.020 witliout out first llaving received a permit as speeifred in Section 9.14.070(1) for sucli facilities from the County Engineer. Said permit will not be granted until tlle plans for the development hzve been accepted by the County Ciibineer. 1 f lhis provision is violatecl, the County Cnbineer m1y decide lo nol accepl a bond t-or . ' ' • . ' , . ♦ `~Y . Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1414-81 Page 11 tlie improvements and may require tlie project sponsor to build aiid certify the facilities prior to final plat. 4. Tllis proposed subdivision or development proposal is located witllin a drainage basin tllat Ilas been identified by tlle Spokane County Engineer's and Utilities offices as liaving storm.water runoff problems. Since this proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners sllotild participate in tlle planning and implementation of a future basinwide stormwater management system. The following statement shall be placed in tlie plat dedication: "Tlie owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County-approved stormwater ' manasement prosram and to pay sucli rates and cliarges as may be fixed tlirougli public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructiiig, maintainiiig or operation of stormwater control facilities." 5. The Spokane County Engineer lias revieNved the extension of time and will require tllat tlle proposed plat shall be improved to tlie standards set fortli in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 99-0265, as anleiided, wliich establishes rebulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 6. All previous imposed County Engineeriiig Conditions of Approval are stil) applicable. SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITES DEPARTMENT 1. This proposed subdivision or development proposal is located witllin a draiiiage basin tllat lias been identified by tlle Spokane County Engineei•'s and Utilities offices as Ilaving stormwater runoff problems. Since tllis proposed subdivision or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners sliould participate in the planning and implementation of a future basinwide stormwater management systein. Tlle following stateinent sliall be placed in the plat dedication: . "Tlie owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County-approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities." NOTE: No otlier new conclitions of apProval ivere requestecl by the reviewing agencies listed below. Under state law and county ordinance, you liave lhe right to appeal this decision to the Spokane Couiity Hearins Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public Iiearing will be scliedtiled. To file sucli ail appeal, you must submit a letter along with the approprinte processinb fee plyable to the Spokaiie Cou»ty Division of Planning, witllin 14 (fotirteen) calendar days from the date tliis decision is signed. If you liave any questions, please call the Spokaiie Couiily Division of ['laiinins at 477-7200. DATED THIS 20"' DAY OF JUNE, 2000 ~ James Richardson, Associate Planner . , . C: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, Scott Enge(liard Spokane County Division of Engineering, Developer Services, Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities, Water Resources, Jim Red Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Healtli District, Steve Fiolderby Spokane County Division of Building-aiid Code Lnforcement, Jeff Forry Files (6 copies) Stanton-Spokane L.P., 16720 N. E. 116'Ii Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Riverwalk 50 L. L. C., 16720 N. E. 116'11 Street, Redmond, WA 98052 Sliorewood liomes, 3901 Sclireiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83815 Wel Co. Group, c/o H&H Property, 827-108'li Ave., NE, I3ellevue, WA 98004 Pacific Properties, 14410 Bel Red Road, Bellevue, WA 98007 K.C. Constniction, P O Box 1] 1455, Hayden Lake, ID 83835 CLC, 707 West 7t1i, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 ~ : • ~ ~ . ~3 a._.__._..___ __.~__w.____ . . . ~ , _..._._._---..._._._..____._._~_..._~~._.__..__.___..U~''~ ,/'~~w"~v ~%~2~/°J.fG_ __l~•/~ ::~:Jf ~ _.~!~'~~~i~?_____~.w_..-----._~._~_.._~_..._ :~C~~.~-~. • ~ ✓i`• > • ~ . _ ~ :%r'.~lt~`-~ -----__.___.~~`_t` ?G.•'.%<~(` .~v?;~~v~.---._~'~•:!'~'~ .~'_.r ..//_i~.~ ~V / ~LJ(~ ~-C~ s~ /4r~` C.•`w'_..',"'~ _..r~__. ~ .~0~~ ~ , r:,1._: _/_------_i~.`'^'~ f,~", ~-~1-~'~~-~~~:?.-~' ~ ____.tl....__~.__.... ~~.✓_-c ~ . / U ~'t.~G<,.~.•' ~ ' _ jlc~--~ _ _ _ • . . . v , ~ ~ ~ <„r ~ • ~ / . ~.l.~ / < ~r:•'i f:~ . F < - (f'^ jr rJ t-' / ~1 j~ ' L; ~ `t' ,~f t'' ` • _ _.__~~sT` ~i;,-.___.-___.._. _ ` _T~-----•-~-~- --Y - ~...y' „ , ~ C.~ ~ r • r Pv!L.e 7 L'_ - - - ~jj ~ V ~ J ~ ____W...... _ .W_ -...L.._ _ ~ %'CS /2-. • /Q _ . _ . . i. . _ . ~ . , ~ 114