The URL can be used to link to this page

25503 INTERIOR STREETS & MISSION ROAD IMPROVEMENTS . ~ ro ~ ~ ~ ~ %700 f4 ~ IZ r~BLrC ~OCUMEr~T ~ ~~~t+~fA~►~- ~~~~INAL ~r ~ LT S ~tAS . WIN+C ~ _ ~ ~ nATS ACCEPTED. , . r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGIIVEERING A►UD ROADS ~ A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTVIENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis Vi. Scott, P.E., Director March 4, 1998 Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West 7ffi Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Att: Bruce Howard Re: Riverwalk 7h Addition (Mission Road): Project Certification Package Dear Bruce, Please be advised that the Project Certification Package submitted by Inland Pacific Engineering for Riverwalk 7"` Addition - Mission Road Improvements is accepted. In addition, be advised that the improvements along Mission Avenue as shown, detailed, and certified in the record drawings and construction documentation package are accepted by the Division of Engineering and Roads. Please note that the warranty period for this project will extend through March 4, 1999. A final warranty inspection will need to be made at that time. Sincerely , I . = Jim Radke, P.E. GOUNN ENGINFFRS O Development Engineering Services ~Q OFFICIAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT . pRIGINAL "AS_BUILTS" CERTIFIED RE RD DRAWIId.GS P'IIOJECT DATE ACCEPTED: , 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . . . ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. November 21, 1997 g~%GOVNTM E~GINEI~iqS IPE W.O. # 96070-1 ffice OFFICIAL PUBLlC DOCUMENT Spokane County Engineer's O ORIGINAL - W.1026 Broadway . Spokane, Wa. - 99260 ~'AS - B U I LTS 11 CERTIFIED REC RD DRAWIN - Attn: Jim Radke, P.E. Pi73OJECT - DATE ACCEPTED: RE: Riverwalk 7' Addition, PE-1414 Dear Jim: ' The construction of this project is substantially complete and conforms to the plans specifications approved by Spokane County except as noted on the "Record Drawings". At the request of our client, Pacific Properties; we would like to request the reduction of any bonds associated with the construction of this project. All punchlist items associated with the public portion of this project have been completed. Please find the following information which is intended to be reviewed by you and used in the certification and acceptance process for Riverwalk 7' Addition. 1. A three ring bound set of inspection and testing reports for the constructed work. Included within the binder are the following sections which document the scope and nature 'of the inspected work. A. Correspondence B. Test Reports C. Field Reports . . 2. One set of sepia mylar and two sets of bond copies have been included for review and comment. It should be understood that this submittal provides certification for the initially constructed and . approved construction items associated with this project. This certification only irriplies that the items shown were substantially built as designed, and only valid the day the as-built survey and visual inspection were performed by this engineer. This certification makes no guarantee that other construction activities associated with overall plat build out such as home builders or new home owners have not in fact dislodged, destroyed, filled in or in any manner affected any of the items certified. It should also be noted that this letter does not relieve the contractor or the developer from warranties implied within their bond documents. - 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 . • 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 r Riverwalk 70' page 2 If you have any questions concerning this certification package, please call. Sincerely, . Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. , ~ _ - . Todd R. Whipple, P.E. President bh/TRW - cc: Doug Birch GOuNN ENGIN Dick Materne ,~p~N S O ~ OFFICIAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT kO ORIGINAL . "AS-BU ILTS" CERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS PROJECT DATE ACCEPTED: Todd Whipple ~ - - - From: Admin Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 1997 11:10 AM To: Todd Whipple Subject: Mail Call From: Franz, Dean Subject: RE: Riverwalk 7th Addition - Barker Road Taper To: 'Inland Pacific Engineering' Cc: Date: Todd, Jim Radke and I talked. We at the County Engineer's Office understand the problem of constructing a taper on private property in this case an easement cannot be readily obtained. For a diverging taper in this area, the County agrees with you that it isn't warranted to acquire easement/or right-of-way for this diverging taper. Please revise the plans of record to reflect the elimination of this taper. You can check out the plans or submit a revised plan. Thanks, Dean Page 1 Riverwalk 7th Addition - Constniction Punchlist J 16 April, 1997 The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading 8. Install Type III barricades as specified. (East end of Salmon River Lane) Schedule III: Storm Drainage - 2. Filtration swales B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' Ponds B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. ~ C.iv) The inlet in Pond "Y3" requires cleaning. C.v} T'he inlet in pond "Y2" requires cleaning. C.vi) The inlet in Pond "Y1" requires cleaning. C.viu) The inlets for Pond "RT" require cleaning. 6. Concrete inlet Type 1 C) Inlets must be cleaned and protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all inlets) Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: A) All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. ~ Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement 2. Interior Roads; B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. Schedule VII: Utility Trenching B} Coordinate with W. W.P. for street light placement. Miscellaneous Items: , C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Canstructian Punchlist December 30, 1996 / 19 Mar 97 The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a guideline, it may not include all aspects of the construction as many items are not identifiable due to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction and backfill of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compaction and backfill. 8. Install Type III barricades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) Schedule III: Storm Drainage 2. Filtration swales B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' Ponds A) All `208' ponds need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. Pond H requires eacpansion once acljacent basnzent is backfilleiL B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond "RT". E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate. C.iv} The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires cleaning. C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. C.vi) The inlet and drywell combination in Pond "Y1" requires the same items mentioned above. C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. 5. Spakane County Standard Curb Inlet Type 2: A} One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. (71 6. Concrete inlet Type 1 C) Inlets must be cleaned and protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all inlets) , Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk -1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: A) All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. B) Install all wheelchair ramps per Spokane County Standard Detail A-4. Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement 2. Interior Roads; A) IVi'inimum density and depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets. 0 o The penalty and resolution to this item may be negotiated between the contractor and sponsor. (See Petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 18, 1996. Copy attached) B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. Schedule VII: Utility Trenching 1. Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. A) Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. B) Coordinate with W.W.P. for street light placement. C) Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. D) Coordinate with U. S. West for pedestal installation. Miscellaneous Items: . B) Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. ~ ~ . May 21, 1996 ~N~ND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. W.O. No. #96070 . Spokane County Engineers West 1026 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99260 ATTN: Mr. Ed Parry, P.E. RE: Results of Soil Ciassification Testing Riverwalk 7th Addition . Liberty Lake, Washington M r. Pa rry: - Please find enclosed the results of soils classification testing by our subcontractor, Gifford Consultants, Inc. on a soil sample obtained from the above referenced residential development. , The soil sample was obtained from McMillan Lane, Sta.44 + 05 at centerline, 2 feet ~ below existing adjacent grades by members of our staff. We certify herein that the ° sample tested was obtained from the.location stated above, and that based on the data enclosed, the USCS soil* classification of GC is correct for the sample tested. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions regarding this letter or other aspects of the project.' . Respectfully, I N LAN D PAC I F I C E G I wASkl•t~~'~~ ~ ~ o Jer E. Peterson, `w P. E. Project Engineer ~`ss~oNALE~'~' JEP/ell EXPIRES 11/ 27/?7 ~ Enc. ~ . a:1960761soi1tes Lwpf 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. June 10, 1996 . W.O. No. 96070 - Spokane County Public Works Development Services W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. Re: Riverwalk 7th Addition - Proposed Mission Avenue"Section 2nd Letter Ed: This is a clarification regarding the Mission Avenue section that we are proposing to use. ~ At this time, and consistent with our previous correspondence (enclosed), we are intending to use and have designed Mission Avenue in accordance with the special section provided by Spokane County (enclosed). If this is the same section that North Idaho Engineering used for their design and had to receive a Design Deviation for we would like to have the design deviation extended further east to include this project. If the approved section enclosed does not need a design deviation, then disregard this letter. Copies of the previous submittal are attached. Should you have any questions concerning this project please call at 458-6840. Sincerely, InlInd Pacific Engineering Co. . Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW/tw enclosures- ~ cc: file - 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 ' 1 , ~ ~ ~ . . ~ r ' AiISMY AYENUE ~ ~CX~ , . NEN NllJBE ' . ~ R~W 1Q' ACWJSK{0N , IMO1N AS REQUrttEO tet~aawf . ' DRAINAGE AND 90E7fAlK WsDw FASfMEN1 KAsto ' 12' 14' 4' ' iRAFF.'C iRAC7C/ u;C~£~~~~~, ~ zoa ~eATMat sioEw~uK~ • ' AND I ` SN019 STORACE ' ~ bt ANN s7x I+lN „r oasna a~a~o i I I ACP Cl. "A' 4" 1--?/C ± 0.2' j A C P C l. ' ' i O T A I A C A O E P i H ~ ' TYPE,g. ~8 I6' N7N'MUN M~ATLR OEPiH !QR 2C6 0.9' MIIJIYUfA XPTN f0A STORM 401UNE ,aTC MAXaduM NATER SURPACE EIEVAIIGV i~ PfA R-YALUF TZSIAJC 1 OOES N01 EHCROhCN ON FUIUR£ ACQUISIt10N MEA ~ . . I ' I ' AJGlr0045.0T'iV I Dr°wn 8Y ' 894 SCALE 'OrFCE Of ' ASS ON AVENUE . SHEET I Oesigned 8r rMitoNrAL: SFOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER eouNn ~D:NEER ~ c p ~ E.J.P. 08/94 ' NONE W. 1028 BROaQWAY AVE. C1aST QF 7,qRKER ROAD checkea ar ~vERncAc: SPORANE4SE~3600 o-0170 TYPiCA,-. P,OADWAY ScCTION ~ NONE Oale: fl gy O~ . i I ! j w • . . . . . ~ "1 ~ re~ ~ •-i. ! INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERIN-G, INC. , May 29, 1996 W.O. Na. 96070 Spokane County Public Works Development Services W. 1026 Broadway . Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. . Re: Riverwalk 7th Addition - Proposed Mission Avenue Section Ed: Enclosed is a copy of the cross-section for Mission Avenue that we are proposing along our Plat frontage. Please review and comment on this section. It generally, conforms to - the section constructed by North Idaho and is consistent with the 1995 SCRS and the ' special section that you forwarded. Your prompt attention to this project would be greatly appreciated. Should you have any questions concerning this project please call at 458-6840. Sincerely, Inl and Pacific Engineering Co. . ~ 1 • . ~ • V-~ Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW/tw enclosures , cc: file 707 West 7th • Suite 200 . 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, lD 83814 509-458-6840 0 FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • fAX: 208-769-7277 ~ ~ - • - - ° - - - - ~ e~ r S / • , ' • 1 65' ~ EXIST. PAVEMENT 12' 25' SIDEWALK, DRAINAGE .ANQ SLOPE EASEMENT EXIST. , . : R~W 20' PROP. 4' , 61 15' 10' R/W 30' ~ - - - SIDEWALK . '208' TREATMENT FUTURE ACQUISITION . AND ' SNOW STORAGE 2' , 4' , 12' , 12' BIKE TRAFFIC TRAFFIC .XISTIN( . , . . LANE ~ ~ROUNC . 3.51 ~ 8' ~ 3.5' Z% MlN 29~ MIN - 5 . ~ ,0200 FT/FT MIN 0 ~ ~ ~1Vc ~114 ~11tc ~tc ~ltc ~►Vi 13,5 ~i1►~ ' - _ = _ _ _ = _ -t 29 M1N 1 SWALE DEPTH TC TYPE nB'' tURB EXIST. 4" COMPACTED CIASS "A" ASPHALT CONCRETEJ = 1 CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/47, ASPHALT ON 6" COMPACTED CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH W.S.D.O.T. SPECIFICATIONS. , (NOT TO SCALE) J I NLAND MISSION AVENUE SPECIAL SECTION . . PACIFIC R IVERWAL 7TM AD D ITI O N EfVQINEERINQ ~ 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 ^ ' , V r DATE: / Ze ~ ~ TO: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. COMPANY: 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 41v- j~~- zl 71 S Spokane, WA 99204 - - - - - - - A FAX NUMBER: Telephone - (509) 458-6840 Aa (7. / .F 1 c.- FAX - (509) 458-6844 FROM: ~ roT ~ ~ u4 / i NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER . INCL. COVER PAGE ~ NOTES: ~ 7f~ l "5 /''.5 AL /~"~c,~ /'"1n4a /6 7"",'c- cv d C~ 4! T ~ AC~ ~/P ~ ✓ ~ vd~t.~_ S ~ ~9'r~',,t ~;6' ep./ ~Q~.'~ ~/''Ct C~/ C~ ~`'S' ✓ of~' 07~ / i . J~Ico fi"" vd C. ~ . d " A,~~'t~ . ~ i~ ~ FAX TRANSMISSION ~ . ~ v. 7 INLAND PACIFIC WORK OR MATERIALS ENGINEERING Z , DEFICIENCY REPORT NO. Oate 36) Tol{/ ,1~~ Project Name I~/f'✓~ ~r,1 Ile , ~ ProJ'ect No. ~~O AU' l NATURE OF DEFICIENCY Q C"s /'r .'r - / J / SP 7~il3ii► D ~ ~ /J~~i r' ~go jr-; 7eex / ~~J / .~L ~ f~ . .s.J tP Rp //T 7(1 .0om f ~ 1 r ~ 7 -Y ~I ~ ~L 1!~'/^ ~ i1~ ~'r~` . ~•r / S~P try 7e ~ ~ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'G~J~ l 7 r ,r ;r .~3~ .1' f P n ~ . ; G~1~f 't,-~•t ~ lW i fG~ 7`~~ 1., ; r.~'f~ ~,~r~ j ~t ~~r1~ ~ (I~ /~4 ~C~ ~/1 /11.~ !'.J~ s I~CJ C° / ,Z't /c,•Ya .~r~ - ~r~~ Ps SlAi( &fP~ 1f ' l. ~ ~ l! G 1 ' ~ ~.~r.' Cd l! i,~1 ) ~ ~ C~ ~ ( 'p~ .r ~ ' h~ /~'c`~ v'- ~ .4~~ ~r" ~ C--% ~rC 1 ~ C" • ~ Oelivered To Contractor's Representative at 6y ~ 1 ~r~ ~y a-, ~,v~'~ ~ ~s ; - . ~ ~ A '/:~i~",. .•"~,~"~Y~ i ~ DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ACTION ~ ~)eficiency Report Released By at , Date Reviewed By Date , - : • ~ • ~ ' October28,1996 ~~LAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, 1NC. r pacific Properties, Inc. 14410 Be1-Red Road Bellevue, WA 98007 . ATTN: Mr. Doug Bit+ch RE: Rivervvalk 7th - Mission Avtnuo Paving neficient Bue Conrse Thickness Dear poug: . We are taking this opportunity to infortn you of construc,tion within the Spokane County right- of-way that is not in confanmance with the approved project plans and specificalions. As noted by oux unspector, pavement base coufrse roclc at approximately sta. 22 + 70 had a measured thickn,ess of 5 inches, raxher tban the 7 inches specified. The paving subcontractor was notified of this point of non-confonaancx, bui chose to precede with asphalt placement without conecting ~ the non-conforming work. A coPY of DailY Field Report No. 53, dated 10l22l96, documenti ng . the-sequence of events is enclosed. Please feei free to caff if you. have any qu.estions regarding this letter or othw aspects of the proj ect, . . . . Respectfidly Submitted, rnland Pacific Engine,ering, Ync. . . •r~`,~~ . ~ Bruce A. Howard . Principal Enclosures: Daily Fieid Report No. 53 cc: Spokane County Engineers, Mr. J'im Radke - Inland Asphalt, Mr. Steve Meyers . . Gary & Sons, Mr. * Dave Goss ~ BAH:cf . : - . . . . . . . . . . J:1DOC11hEMS196071-11PAV~t('~,WPP OCY 3 0 19% . ~ . - 707 wrst nn . suite zoo Zozo Lakew+ooe oTive • suite zos Spokane, WA 99204 Caeur d'I►Jent, ID 83814 509-4S8V6840 • fAX: 509-458-6844 208-765.7784 • FAK: 208-769-7277 Pa? • ? T OG T fa ^nkl : rafa _ _1 A a I I nr~~ I • -.1i r . i u n r. . r-.- r-- ~ ..f , INLAND PACIF1C ENGINEER,ING, 'IPJC. ~ November 1, 1996 ~ Gamy and Sons General Contractors 24 N. Sycfamore St, . . Spokane, WA 99202 ATTN: Mr. Ilave Gass RE: Riverwalk 7th 1Vlissivn Avenue Paving Deficient Base Course Thickness (Ame,nded Deficiency Repurt) Dear i3ave; I have reviewed all of our base course depth testing data and found 30 tests over apgraximately 1,300 lineal feet of raadway, which exceeds the 5pakane Caunty Standards. The extra tests were perforrned due to previvus substandard test results. 'Fhe average depth of crushed rock vvas g" nver the entire 1,3041ine.al feet ofraadvvay. The m.irrimum required depth is 711. The average depth of crushed rock was faund to be in excess of the rninirnum required. We did find insuffi+cient depths at tvvo locations, one at the intersection ofHarTnony Lane and Mission A.venue which was carrected prior to paving, anci the other at approximate station 22+70. The area of station 22+70 was re-tested in eight places and found to have depths ranging frorn 5" ~ to S".Only one test aut of the e1ght was found to be lacking the rrunirnum 7„ of crashed rack. We feel the insufficient depth measurement was an isolated area. It is also our opinion that since the subgrade rnaterial has less than 5% variation of rnaximurri density compared to the crushed rock used for base course, the structural integrity of the roadway is not campromised as the base caurse adds only aslighkly higher in place density than the subgrade material-. Therefore, it is our opinivn the subgrade and base +course were prepared in substantiat conformance with the plans and specifications. Please feel free to cat11 if you have any questions regarding this letter ar ather aspects of the project. Respectfbily Subrm'tted, Inland Pacific Engineeringy Inc. Bruce A,. Haward . Principal ~ cc: Pacific Properties, Mr. Doug Birch Spokane Count,y Engineers, Mr. Jim Radke Inland Asphalt, Mr. Steve Meyers 1•1I]OCL1MENi'S"71-IIPAYING2.WYF 707 Vlfest lth • 5uite 200 2020 Lakewoad Drive * 5uite 205 Spokane,WA 49244 C4eur d'Alene, IQ $3814 504-458-6840 - FAD(- 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7271 c3o3~?~ ~rt~~a~`sw;Sav.+ r ~ ' -OGT. -30' 96 (WED) 15:08 WTB RELOA~ YARD TEL :509 51~ 6205 - P. 001 ~ ~ . < < . ~ rnn JoS t$ . ~ E . . . ~ ~ ~ 24N. Sycalnore ~ - - - . Spokane, WA. 99202 DWe: October 30,1996 ~ . To: ENLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING Atta.: Bcuce Howatd Fax Numbet: [509] 458-684 ~ Ftom. Dave Goss Our Fac Number: [509] 534-6205 Number of Pages Including This Page: [ 4~ Comanents: ~ - . . FOR YOUR FII..E. ~ PI.EASE eA.LL (509) 534.9363 IF THERE IS A FROBLEM WI'ICH T.EESE PAGrES. ~ 7'haak You . 6205 P. 002 oft ~EU ~ 509 5 ~ O~T. -30' 96 (1~EQ) 15: 49 WTB ROAQ YARD k.. _ j ~ ~s3 :9~36 11 . 13 c,0•;~~:.►= Ir.L~;~~~L ;;SP►;ALT P~:GE 'J Sent Dy: BUDiNGER&AS54C. 5095359569 10130196 10:5DAM joD 190 page 215 9828 E. lirotdwAy $pokane. Washlnpton 99202 bbUding@r & aSSOCiateS gsotechnicai & r~aterial engineers Mr. Dm CarpentGS Uctober 23, (996 lnlind Asphah P.V. Bmc 3366 Sgokule, WA 99220-3366 Ptoiect Numbtr l,96361 • Submittai !t1 pROJEcr- wverw8,k spaans, wA . SU8lECT: Aspheh Caacrete Pavammt - ' Laboratory TastLng Beqt Mr. Csryemer, At yvur request, we bave proviW laboratory raiting an /lsphah Conuda Pavcmenc sampied by you, :esneved by ts vn sete, mOctobor 22. 1496. Lsbormry snelyeis was lttnited to tho totlawuig ~ . test, cebeded at your dsscaatian: 1) Tlttarvitical muimum (rice density) 11STM O-2041 Sum,rrriry. . . Test t+esults am peose+ated a+ the xtcached l.aboratnry. tt is s pieasune to bo of ctrvice to you m this pragecx. Shoutd you have any questians regard,ng tbus report ar the swuk9 cohtavtod herem, please catf. - RetpecxWy SubcnQtad. BUDIAiQrER & ASSOC[ATES ~...J~1 , -...•Z.t.V~- 9 Terri 1. Perry I.abotatory Maaager . T1PIcr Addressee - Z Anadur►ent ~ F.C. Budin9er PF Stophen 0. 8urcheK PE (509) 535-8B41 JoAn E. Finntgen EfT FAX (509) 535-9589 i ~ OVT. R30} 95(11ED) 15' V9 WT+/ LlEL4D lALLLf TEL`50J 531-6205 L. 00L . ~ . - • 1 0f 35.' 1996 1 1: 13 5095~149 ,,o7 INL4hIL~ ~SPHALT PAGE 64 E~Y: S1.1OINMA&A55QC. SogS35g5a9 Job i9Q page 315 AJ vFK wALY, . ' SPOKANE, 1akIA ~kcu~•~~l~hl~k-~c L~bj#1 i 7 U LILORA7Y~~~ i.lJD6RATURY NI1MBER SAMPLIE N[#NMER 596-672 SAMPLED By 2 - SI11~PLE TY'pE . B ~ A. c4itrA DA►TE R.PCS"j) Batk TMORE"ICAJL ~ 0/22/4b ~ MAXWM liFNSM Pcf 154_2 3312 . ~ ~ - bLJda~~eir & 8SSOCIateS ~ geDteGhniCal & materiat engrneer5 ♦ o s ,I~ ~ Memorandum . ~ . Date: November 5, 1996 . To: Kent Henderson, Petroleum Sciences, Inc. From: Bruce Howard Sub j ect: Riverwalk 7th (IPE # 96070-1) Pavement compaction Please find attached a copy of the map we had discussed. The map indicates the areas of asphalt that do not reach the required minimum density of 92%. I have also included a copy of density test results taken by us and Crifford Consultants. The asphalt was placed on October 8th, 1996. The tests were performed at approximate 200 foot intervals. The core samples should be the same type of patterning. The samples should be taken from Augusta, Sandusky, Potomac, Rio . Grande, and McMillan Lanes. You should get approximately 12 to 15 samples. The asphalt supplier was Inland Asphalt, and the general contractor is Garry and Sons. (Dave Goss) Project Manager) The request for core samples came from Dave Goss so please bill them directly. Their address is, Garry & Sons General Contractors, 24 N. Sycamore Street, Spokane J Washington 99202. When the samples are taken, please note the depth of asphalt as well, it would be nice to know this information. The contractor and developer would like to bring this issue to a conclusion as soon as possible, so please keep me informed of the progress. If you have any questions concerning this issue, please feel free to conta.ct me. ._~t~~~ • . / ~flrr~ , , • ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ IP6 4 G~. ~ ~ C~-s~ . • i~' - _ _ . ' r__ _ . _ ~~~g . ~ + 200" 07 ~ - - - . . ~ ) T ~ . . - - - - - - ~ ~ ~j~~ ~ S35 ~ ~ - - - ~ _ _ _ . 1 a' . ~ ~ ~ \rJ M AM c l ~ 4 \ . r • s . / 2 3 i . , . . ~c SCA-E z°° 1 9 GRAPH ~Ao0 1 9 1~ I to0 . \ZOO, 100 ti tn 1 ~ 16 A5 i4 13 6~ 6 .,,_43' 46 5 12 X x 1 10,0 4 • 6 ~ 0 11 2 q A~ is A9 ,z} ~8A .J ~Q1 qv r 5 A6 20 i flt ~ 1Q `''3 2 4 ~ ~ 5 ~ ° ~ 21 + 12 X~ r 1 ~ A-1 ~ 14 2 rM+ 12~ 19 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ •"r' ♦ r^ r 'I 4 ~ ' K ~ 0 1 4 ~r r- - NO1t..-'04•96 (MON) 15:35 WTB RE1-*-) YARD TEl,-5Q9 6205 ~ P. 001 A (31 - E x1mC. PM ~ JOB t~ . 24 N. Syc~ore ~ Spokane, WA- 99202 FcgC: List Initials . ~ ' . ~ , Date: Novetnber 4!b, 1996 ~ NGINEEYtING To: INLAND PACIFIC F Attn.: Bruce Howard Fax Number: [509] 458-6844 , a ~ - • ~ FrOm : Dave Goss Qur Fax Nwnber: [509] 534-6205 Number of Pages IncludirtgThis Page: [ one] _ Comments: '`Please uutiate a core test on the aress of aspkgt in Riverwalk Addi.tioa that did not pass the compaction test.. - *Questions-don't hesitate to cait me aa my mohile number 981-1 ?89 PLEASE CALL (509) 534-9363 LF THM IS A PRQBLEM WI'I'H THESE PAGES. Thank You t w . • , INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL ~ 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax: (549)458-6844 , . . . . ; ::•:z~ r':~::.. - - ~ i:;f ti;::::;: _•_;;:_•";r:::>~:'~ - r;:; u~;; - : ~•~xr;: : . = ~:r.~::•:- - ::C?AT r~: TO: Garry & Sons General Contractors , . :v~~.. E: N ove m -b- . :~yy:: ~~`~rti•:.: . , :.::•:::•i: =:i f t ~ • • ti•4. ,•.S'. tiJ._.._': 24 N. Sycamore St. ~ SPokane, Wa. 99202 ::sC . r •:.c:.::~- - . ::t.;::;::::. • - : '•x-:~~~~ . '''i':> ''.;.:•;::ii::`.`: .•.YJ."J.. ~ ' ' :::~'i..: e ::-.~:l:~. . ~ - . ~ :~'.tiV.YJ::::::.'•.. . : ~tiM{: ~l ATTENTION: Dave Goss :w .-.r •._::•_ti:~. . ~ ....y.i • ~ ..1i.:. h :}.ti^::y ~dd t~~:~ ~ ~'r:~:~ _}S}::-?:~:';:i qi j"' ' `4 ~4•. . . ti:h:t:-.'-:~:: :v.•: :w" '"~".ir':}< }f< i'..- ' 'r ~ . . ~ : i{i:}:::i . G%+.•: ,'ri:~'~_','+~'•,'~:?::'. • , . . . . . v?{:ii::,::.: ~ _ •.v ECT PROJ . : ::xr: :r~.: .~v :-t>:~:. ;.y,}:; • }M : • ~ • - • . ..:}:i::L.:~:::??: ' . .tir... . . _.....:ik}:•}''~: - 1:~.....""'". . J Description: - ❑ Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter ■ Preliminary Punchlist ❑ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents 11 . 0 Work AutMorization 0 Report 11 No. Copies Description 1 Preliminary Punchlist ~ Purpose ■ Information ❑ Review & Comments 0 Per Your Request * Written Approval 11 Signature & Return Remarks - - Dave - Please find enclosed the above referenced information. Doug Birch asked me to prepare this preliminary punchlist for your use. If you have any questions, please give me a call. , ~ Signe . e- cc: Doug Birch, Pacific Properties ~ ~ ~ ~ . . • . i . ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Preliminary Punchlist Ci November 6, 1996 The items listed below a.re preliminary in nature due to the status of construction, and the amount of remaining work to be performed. This list should be used as a guideline, and is not intended to be a complete or final punchlist. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. 1. All Spokane County Type 1 curb drops need the apron poured. 2. All `208' ponds require fine grading and the drywells need to have the grates adjusted to proper elevations and grouted properly. 3. All sidewalk needs to be installed. 4. 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond "RT". 5. Asphalt apron around inlet at station 24+73 Lt., Salmon River Lane is required. 6. All roadside swales need to be completed. 7. Salmon River Lane: approximate station 19+80 Rt., edge of asphalt is broken due to truck traffic. 8. All street and stop signs need to be installed. 9. Type 3 barricades need to be installed at 19+06, Salmon River Lane. 10. All drywells require the metal frame and grate to be grouted. 11. Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate, and to be cleaned out due to excess material falling into the opening. 12. Ponds "K" and "L" need to be lowered. The concrete cap is not low enough to allow the percolation of storm water into the ground. (Note: The metal frame and grates appear to be higher-than the adjacent roadway. 13. The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires grouting around inlet and outlet pipe. The drywell needs to be cleaned out and a metal frame and grate installed. Each grate needs filter fabric. 14. The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. 15. The inlet and drywell combination in Pond "Y 1" requires the same items mentioned above , and to be exposed. The drywell is buried under a stockpile of spoil material. 16. The drywell in Pond "B" needs to be exposed and adj.usted. Drywell is buried. 17. Sandusky Lane - The asphalt adjacent to lot 5 is broken at the edge. _ 18. The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. 19. Asphalt patch on Augusta Lane needs to be completed. 20. One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. 21. McMillan Lane, approximate station 45+75 Rt., the asphalt is broken due to truck traffic. 22. Pond "T" drywell requires a metal frame and grate. 23. Pond "I" drywell needs to be exposed and adjusted. 24. Potomac Lane, approximate station 15+00 Rt., the edge of asphalt is broken due to traffic. 25. The edge of asphalt and curbing needs to be backfilled to prevent truck traffic damage. _ 26. Piles of garbage, concrete, and asphalt need to be removed. . . , ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL ~ 707 W. 7th Avenue, Sufte 200 Spokane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 ..L•.•.':.'. ~ •i!.•.•::: !.'..':.:.V..: l~J ~•~!•{.~Y:}?~:•:~:~::•}?v}?:~:::~ •:t{? .:i;{: w: TO: Garry & Sons General Contractors ti•.t.:. rr:::t-.. : •:i i ~'ro$>:$`•.•`•;i;:;i;: ;i; ; . ~ .:::~:;=.;i . . r. .i : •:::::::i:>: i•: i :'i ' : r::: ~ .y.:. 24 N. SYcamore St. f .ti1•~ A f . . ~~R• Spokane, Wa. 99202 .<:~96C~7~~ - ~ . OJ~C~' ~~lAl~E::rwalk::7#h ATTENTION: Dave Goss ~ • • ,x~~ . •r:t:•:.:.:: :~i~i:•::2 ~:>r::•>::>:~:r~::.:: r :::i:::::::•:::: ~ . :.1vl~ •X: J •:•:•f:•J: lll: f: ~ . . • • . ~ • . t..~ . . . .•.ti:•••.~' '•J...J.•:i~:.:•~lf}~.:::.~ ~1~:•:::.~.•..~ '`Ad __I ~t~::;.::::;:::~~,~~~::::r . ~ ~ : . ~.~}\~l.j; : yrf ~•'t . .....:~:.~:.~.'..y 'v,r:•:...::: i::?~: T?:~ . , ~ _'l,.;Y,.~: i:v r :ti~?i i:i . . . :'ti::.:•: : ~ ~ r'~~ ~.~}.{v ~ r y ' .~y{ } : i:}:•' . , , ~~r:: ;~:•,::{rtiir'~:;:~'r'~ . . titi•YS::•::. ~ :•G:::: . • :•:titi ~ . . :•:~~}:~::ti{i{.}y;'.}: : PROJECT . . ' . . . . . . . . ..........f....... .~1'~ ~~.~..f:~: . . ' l Description: 0 Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter . ■ Core Sample Results ~ Cl Original Drawing [:3 Contract Documents O 13 Work Authorization 0 Report 0 No. Copies Description 1 Core comp,action test results with attached map. ~ Purpose ~ ■ Information O Review & Comments 0 Per Your Request O Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return - Remarks . Dave - Please find enclosed the above referenced information. Nine out of fifteen tests do not reach the minimum 92% compaction requirement. Please discuss with Inland Asphalt and get back to me with any questions. Si9ned: t-~ cc: Doug Birch, Pacific Properties ~ ~ w ~ . ,-~jETOLEUM SC I ENCES 4• _ 240 1 ry_ p 1 ~ ~ • Inc A ~isplialt Tcchnology • AsPhalt Eanulsivcts ~Polymer Asphalt • Rheology 4817 N. Frcya St., #3 • I'.O. Box 6304 • Spvkane, WA 99207 (509) 489-1758 • Fax (509) 489-2401 ' 1 n 1 and pac i f i c Eng i neer i n9 'Co . . 7Q7 W. ?th Ave. Spokane, WA 99204 November 7, 1996 Pro jecf: 03170 . At;tn: E3ruce Howard - Fto : Core compact ion va 1 ues f rom R i verwa 1 k 7th Add i t i on .Ttie cores 1 isted below were taScen 11-6--96 by our f irm and testod f or bu 1 k spec i f i c grav i ty . Th i s va 1 ue i s changed to pcf us i ng 62.4 as the convers i on f actor . Naw max imum .spec if i c grav i ty tests wero rLin on Lwa cores nnd found to be 155.4 pcf wh i ch f a 1ls between data raportod earlier by our lab based on two separate cfays af produ cti on . We f ee 1 th i s new number, based on the actua 1 cores, i s the best one to use' i n ana 1 yz i ng the % compact i on of th e cor os . . . ~ i g.g AS Cqmp a cti o n Augusta, East end 91 . 4 -ett-,T z~ AuguSf:e + 100 92. 7 ~T-?-tZ-~-tS~' ►~t. n,ta,usta +200 9().6 s~ .,i+ 4Vd c.t. L4) Sandusky, East end 89.2 r-AsT emD o;::' s~ Sand(isky + 100 93.1 6rA • 11 *-,5"~ &L-. Sanciusky 4•200 90.8 5n4-. ior-4S Z6. McM i 1 1 an, East end 91.4 Jtg, iX'~- oo Lt-. g~ McMi 1 1 an +200 91.6 5rA, IlYt-Is eL-. c-1) McMi l1 an +400 92.3 snq, c./Z+G~o L4--. McM i 1 1 an +600 88.4 Sra.. VU-_ f2 io Urantio, South End 92.6 sr4- ~iZ 12 i o Grande +200 88.4 SM i I R i o Cir ande +300 88.4 SM , ~ Z~- to l..t, IU Potomac +400 92.0 gn4. lo+ lo i5 I."otomac +500 93.7 Sr'A. ~Zr Zo t2~: Aver age- 91.1 (Z4spectfully submitted, Kvnt Hondersori, VP Techn i ca 1 Serv i ces ♦ ~ ~ ~ ' ` ~ ~ 3 / ~ ~ • / 0 4 . ~ •q• ~ 5- 6 . S~C 1 7 \ ~`.'r: 4 5 ~ . GRAPHIC SCALE ~ too , 50 100 zoo 6 7 8 (IN FEET 1 lnch - 100 it. 9 ~ or" 20 10 11 / 19 12 1 9 0 oL o ~ , 18 6. 1 ~ ~ 7 OS 13 77 16 14 ~ 2 15 14 13 7 ~ ~~z 7 , 11 20 8 6 - 6 9~ 45 A- G1 u 8 9 10 19 ~ r 5 ~ 17 5 , Q n ~ ~8 Z" - 1A A 18 ~ ' ~ O 6 ' J 4 11 ~`~16 ~ a 7 5 ~ 17 3 .20 3 ~ . 11 ~ ~ 12+0 19 12 15~ 0 21 i 2 i 16 2 0 i 5 ~ o 1.t q. , - 2 3 15 7 1 13 14 22 ^i 1 I ~ O ~ ~ I M TRACT C" \,TRACT Er f ..w _ _ _ ~ ~,.1... _ _ _ _ .....w _ . . . ~ '94 g~ o,~ .i J ~ DATE: ~ To: - ~ COMPANY: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., S u ite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 - ~ FAX NUMBER: ~ Telephone - (509) 458-6840 FAX - (509) 458-6844 i FROM: --gz7a6-r eNUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER INCL. COVER PAGE ~ M NOTES: f~'!`i►/~ -la~~'r 14- (f-D~ 11.1 % ~ Y4"1~ Irs r ~ i J FAX TRANSMISSION ~ . • ' 1 F w4~ ~ November 15, 1996 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ~Garry and Sons General Contractors 24 N. Sycamore St. Spokane, WA 99202 ATTN: Mr. Dave Goss RE: Riverwalk 7th, Private road compaction results Dear Dave: At your request we have completed asphalt cores for the interior private streets at the above mentioned project. Petroleum Sciences, Inc. performed the core sampling and the density testing at your request. Samples were taken only on the asphalt pavement placed on November 8th. The pavement placed on the 7th passed compaction testing of 92% or better. Fifteen core samples were taken. The test results (copy attached) indicate the average density to be 91.1%. The minimum required density of the pavement is 92%. We will accept the asphalt placed on the 8th of November located on the interior private streets at a reduced price. The ~ reduced price pay factor follows the Spokane County procedure, 5-04.3(10)B CONTROL. o (Copy attached) The chart indicates for the average Rice density of 91.1 /o, the pat factor to be ' '95%. Therefore, our calculations indicate pavement placed on November 8th to be 6,337.2 square yards. From schedule 6, road base and pavement, item #2 interior roads, the unit price of $7.70 will be used to calculate the amount to be withheld. Amount to be withheld: (6,337.2 Sq. Yd.) x($7.70) x(0.05) _$2,439.82 If you have any questions concerning this lssue, please feel free to give me a ca11. Respectfully Submitted, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. , ~ Bruce A. Howard Principal - - cc: Pacific Properties, Mr. Doug Birch 1:1DOCUMEN'fS196071-I\PAVING3.WPF 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 . Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'nlene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 . . r~ PETOLEUM SCIENCES i,)4892401 P_01 . ' j Pebukum Scfim-4-M a Inc Asphalt Tcchno2ogy • AsQhalt Eanulsions I L'olyater Asphait •Rheology 4817 N. Frcya St., #3 • I'.O. Box 6304 • Spvkane, WA 99207 (509) 489-1758 o Fax (504) 489-2401 Inland pacif ic Enginearing Co. 707 W. ?th Ave. . Sppkane, WA 99204 November 7, 1996 Project #3170 Attn: Bruce Howard - Fto : Core contpact i on va 1 ues f rom k i verwa 1 k ?th Add i t i on . Ttie cores i i sted be 1 ow were talcen 11--6-96 by our f-i rm and tested 2~- for bu 1 k spec i f i c grav i ty . Th is va 1 ue i s chariged to pcf us i ng 62.4 as the convers i on f actor. Naw max imum .spec ifi c grav i ty tests wero run on two cores ar►d found to be 155.4 pcf which falls between data reportad earlier by our lab based on two separate days of producti on . We f ee 1 th i s new number, based an the actua 1 cores, i s the best one to use i n ana 1 yz i ng the % compact i on of the coros. ~ , . % CQLnp acti Qn, . Augusta, East end 91 . 4 ieA-:A- 1~7NR> cyr z~ A u g u sta+ 10 0 92.7 -sr-A- •12-r1S v-~-~ . -3~ Atagusta +200 90.6 sr~. i/+ 4b L4--. Sandusky, East end 89.2 ErtsT ta.tD oF c+4L-• sj Sandusky ♦/00 93.1 6rA . il+~M L-L-- Sandusky +200 . 90.8 sn4. A:, t-I~r 04=. McMi 1 1an, East end 91.4 rg. `<t~ L t-' Mcf1 i 1 i an +200 91.6 Sr4. P~. McMi 1 1 an +400 92.3 5rA. 417- o L~ McM i 1 1 an f 600 88.4 4n4. qot-8o iZ io C3rancie, South End 92.6 Sr4. +o+o(> ~Z Rio Orancle +200 88.4 , ~ : , 7 ' A i I *'00'' R i o Grande +300 88.4 Sn4. iZt- to L-t'• I~ Potontac +400 92.0 Sr4 fot 10 Notomac +500 93.7 Sr;4. IZ.r2.o V~~. Average- 91.1 - Raspoctfully submitted, Kont Honderson, VP Technical Services , + .7 ' 11/13/96 16:18 `19 3243478 COtINTY ENGIh1F' (6002 . ~ ~ The cracks shall be compSetely fi!!ed flush with pavement suriace using eguipment specified. Tratfic shall not be permitted on the sealed cradcs until suth time that the sealant has cured and wih not track ~ or pick up on vehicle Gres. Matertat used shall require no taping, sand'mg, or covering with any matecial during curing pedod. ~ 5.04.3(8)A ACCEpTANCE SAMPLING AND TE3YING DENSE GRADED MIXTURE . Oelete Section 5-04.3(8)A in its entirety. . . ; 5-04.3(10)S CONTRt3L ` Delete Section 5-04.3(10)5, Controf, end replace it with tfie following: ~ For asphait ooncrete classes A, 8, E, Fand G, where paving is in the Vaffic tanes, including lanes for ramps, truck cVimbing, weaving, speed changes, and !eft tum channei+zation, and ihe specified compacted course thickness is greater then 0.10 toot, ttte acceptable level of compaction shall be a minimum of 92 percent ~of the maximum density as detemntned by VYSD07 Test Metfiod 705. The Eevet of compsction attained wal.be determ;ned as the average ot not less than S nuclear denshy gauge tests takert on the day the mix is ptaced ~ (after completion of the finlsh rolling) at randamly setected Eocations within each !oL The quantlry represented by each {ot witl be no greater than a singte day's productian or approximately 400 tons, whlchever is less. ~ Control Iots net meeting, the mintmum density standard shalt be rerrtoved and replaced wit,h satlsfactory ~ material. At the option of the Fngirreyer, non-complying material may be accepted at a reduced price, based upan the following table: ~ . % RICQ ' °lo P~y , 92.0♦ Above .100 . . 91.091.9 95 . 90.090.9 90 ~ 89.0 88.9 80 befow 89.0 50 a _ ~ The pay adjustmertt shall be computed based upvn the b!d item price for the combined mix of dsphalt ' conctete less the cost of the paving asphatt computed using the invoice price. ~ Crack;ng, checking or tearing ot the asphalt shall be sealed with an approved materiai or removed and repfaced as required by the Engineer. There shall be no extra payment for this work. ~ Cores may be-used as an altemate to the riuclear dens+fy gauge tests. Wt1en Cores are t2ken by the Engineer at the request of the Contractor, the request shalf be made by noon of the first working day fo(lawing placement of thQ mix. The Engineer shall be reimbursed for the coring expenses at the rdte of $75 . per core when the core indicates the acceptable level of cornpaction within a iot has not been achieved. . At the start of paving, if requested by the Contractor, a campact;on test section shall be constructed as directed by me Engineer to determine the compactibiiiry of the miac design. Gompactibiiity shall be based on ~ the ability of the.mi3c to attain the sperAed minimum density (92 percent of the maximum density determined by WSDOT Test Method 705). Fo1lawing determination of compatibiGty, the Contractor is responsible iot the controi of the compactiQn effort, ff the Conttactflr does not request a test seetion, the mix wiil be considered ' compadible. Asphalt Cortcrete Classes A, 8, E, F and G consVucted undet Conditions other than lisied above shall t)e compacted on the basis of a test point evaluation of the compaction train. The test point evaluat;on shall be performed in accordance with instruct;vns from ihe Engineer. The number of passes witfi an approved U969 - Piper Gten !I • 21 Project 96-120 ~ ~o~ . . . ' DATE: ~ TO: ~ COMPANY: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. _ 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 . ~ Fqx NunnBER: Telephone (509) 458-6840 _ FAX - (509)~ 458-6844 ~ FROM: ywo MBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER - INCL. COVER PAGE ~ NOTES: .J- Ea 0" ~"e, ~ z. i f~c.l~S ~ - FAX TRANSMISSION ~ . . ~ . QNovember 1821996 If1LAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. IPE W.O.# 96070-1 , Garry and Sons General Contractors 24 N. Sycamore St. Spokane, WA 99202 - ATTN: Nir. Dave Goss ~ RE: Riverwalk 7th, Private road paving Dear Dave: Due to the appearance of the material and the low compaction test results, we have decided to have a third party look at the material to determine if corrective measures should be taken. At the request of our client, Pacific Properties, we have decided to have Petroleum Sciences Inc. look at the pavement placed on November 8th, 1996, and give recommendations concerning the corrective measures to be taken. At this time we are concerned about the open gradation visible and the lateral cracking that we ~ observed on McMillan and Augusta Lanes. Pacific Properties has decided to withhold payrnent of ~ the asphalt until resolution to this matter has been reached. If you have any questions concerning this issue, please feel free to give me or poug Birch a call. Respectfully Submitted, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. ~ Bruce A. Howard Principal ~ cc: Pacific Properties, Mr. Doug Birch L~DOCUMENI'5146071-11PAVING4. WPF 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Orive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 - • 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 Memorandum ~ Date: November 19, 1996 To: Dave Goss, Steve B. ('11,4 1 kL' From: Bruce Howard Subject: Riverwalk 7th Addition, IPE W.O. 96070-1 We have completed the field data collection for the sewer as-builts at Riverwalk 7th Addition with the exception of two lots. - There is one lot within the plat that does not have a marker post. Lot 1) block 3 on Salmon River Lane has no marker post and has not been found, please locate and mark with a post. Lot 1, block 7 on Sandusky Lane has two sets of foot markers. The original set indicates the service to be approximately one foot below the sewer main. Please locate the service and verify the depth with a new marker post. Please call me when the above mentioned work has been completed. We will need to add this inforrnation to our as-built drawing set. If you have any questions concerning this issue, please call myself or John McKervey. ZG~ly-~~ - ~ cc: Doug Birch C\/i A- vN John McKervey ~ ti . j . s ~ DATE: ~ TO: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. ~ COMPANY: 707 West 7th Ave.. Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX NUMBER: Telephone - (509) 458-6840 zqo i _ FAX - (509) 458-6844 i FROM: l i NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER INCL. COVER PAGE ~ NOTES: . _~l`~L:itL~ i t~ ~p_. ~4 ~n.I t~~'"~'Ij (~..h..i L✓t~s'r? ~ CJ3~a I c-~-r~~ ~S z:<C._ ~"~:l~'.r i~._..►-~ `~7~trc I~-=: ,~.1 ~r- ~~..i~~~~~ r ~ FAX TRANSMISSION ~ . , 03 . m Is% 4 \ .fRACT ~A~ 5 • r~ <S',~ 1 s ~ 2 3 GRAPHIC SCALE 4 5 100 , 50 100 zoo 6 7. . ( iN FM ) 1 ; 1 inch - 140 ft. 9 or - ' 20 10 11 1 / K , 19 ~ 12 i 9 18 nL 13 7 s 17 ~ ~ ~ i 12 2 ` e 16 14 ~ 15 14 ~3 ~ ,l2+ov. 7 a ~ ----~t«~s~ >cg1 .X 04 11 20 ~ 8 4 9~ ~ 6 9 ..~'(~.67 u 8 9 10 ~ 19 5 17 1 Q oa 18 19 ~ 18 4 O : 7 6 ~crJ 4 .11 r~16 ~ J to~ 3 r ~ ~ 3 5 17 20 19 12 X ~ 15 21 16 ~ 2 ~ O i 2 j s~~ltt 4 ~q. 3 15 ~ . 13 14 22 I Mcr "c" \,lPACT "Er _--____---_--___,...~...~.._~..________,...~...~,.w~...~~......~.....w.._.~....~..~.,~,~..~..~~....~_~~w_~__~..~.._.._..m._..~._.....~..._........... . ~ ~ e . . ~ a 70 ~ ~ . ~ 11(e /`S .::l- M I'e 1`1-01~ cf o4 5 c ; c 4 ces~ - L~ : ~ l~t~ ~ ~ ~s-1 a / ~ 7 ~ p~ I L ~ ► ~l~ ~ ~~~Ge-T ~ ~ ' li.' ~C_.. : f-ro VtA ! c ~ 0/ ,A rc e /I.W "loo" (0 7 a ~`,_O e,?'o .6 e,-,-. ,rpf w o ,s e- r.- .5;. a ' ' ~ ~ -e°` ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~.e ~ ~ ~ -e' krz ~ r ~ . a t :'~f' ~ r? c? I~ ~ ~ G,~ ~ . / ° ~^f . 4. . ~ Ce ~.00 l o!'` G~,! it~- . ~ Post-itm Fax Note 7671 Dat~~ pages 11 To file,f'?~re~' From~v Co./Dept,~ t ~ Co. • / •~y%G' ,~.ti.t _~,s C` e f r , Vr Phone # Phone # ~ t Fy Fax # Fax # 2066433475 MURRAY FRANKLYN INC. F-891 T-925 P-001i001 DEC 16 '96 13:43 , I4410 8eI-'Rtd Rd, Saicc 200,- Belle~ae, WA 98007 •~P'hone: (206)644-1323 • Fax: (206)643-3475 . T,?ate. . Fax to: ~,V~a~Homc~ • ....,.r„~~ , . . Com.pa3ny. . ~ Fax # ~ of pages sen.t. . . ~ Faz~ fram. / ~ . ~ . ~u . ~ . coTPany. ~ . - Regarding. . ~ - . . . . ,~i~ Memo. , ~ . . . ~ Z01 / . . oof • -~i• . 4 . . . ~Z 0 (4b ~tc~~ - ~,~ttr~- ~r . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ P JOB # . - ~ ~ CC: Llst Initiais _ , . . ~ Sendez's ;nitials: e c~ DATE: , i7 TO: ~ ~ COMPANY: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. 707 West 7th Ave., Suite 200 `~W'10L Spokane, WA 99204 ~ FAX NUMBER: Telephone - (509) 458-6840 FAX - (509) 458-6844 i FROM: NUMBE OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER INCL. COVER PAGE 2 , ~ NOTES: 12hr j,c/t"S VAJL'."' ~o• ~ . 4-t-7 o ~ .rt/lr- A- ~ ~ ~ FAX TRANSMISSION ~ JVD JLYJYIO .!1U111 ~►vi~i%1%1~° , 1G/ lAI .7J 1V . !V ~ . ` . . ~ ~ AX COVER 5HEET . Spokane Cauiaty Ptiblic Wozks - BiZgineezing Dzvisiol-i . - 1026 West 73roadtivay, Spolcane, WA 99260-0170 . . Third Toor FAX No. = 324-347~ Phone.N'o. (509) 456-3600 Datc: F.~ -No. To: ? Company: City, State LW - ' . . . ~ : . ' Number of'pages (including cover sheet) . J~ ~ . From: ssage ~ • _ _ . . . l . : Nnn I.:t~a CC: List ~ . . . ~ . Novernber 26,1996 . Gury 8c Sons Att: Steve Re: Riverwalk ?`b Addition Enclosed is a copy of the 11-I 5-96 fault summary print-out for the sewer lines - passingthrough the above project. I viewed tne TV" tapes, tne fautt print ouis,. and made visit to the job site. . re , . • IlG lvaavYrltlb ll%rlA&J V%.tv wAlluJ1. v%r %.vl l aiv~ru ~!t av• tv ►7.Y Vvu• vvub uvvbj,/LV+. ` ♦ Item #1: Ail sewer lines are to be recleaned from rocks ~_.d debris. ♦ Item #2: Adjustment rings, inlets end outlets on manholes must.be gouted. ♦ Item #3: ManhoIes must be cleaned of aU rocks and debris. Thank you for your help in $etting the above iterns resolved. Please give me a call at 456-3606 or Fax at 324-3478 when all the items have been completed. I will then request that the sewer lines be re-tv'd and reinspect the manholes. . Sincerely, , Penrry S. Flowers ' - Field Inspector ; r . . - ~ P~t~leurn In~ ~ .~C:L;StIn:t!aI~ J _ Asphalt Technology • Asphalt Emulsions • Polymer Asphalt • Rheology 4817 N. Freya St., #3 • P.O. Box 6304 • Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 489-1758 • Fax (509) 489_2401 ,`~cember 18, 1996 ~NN~ Pacific Properties 14410 Bel-Red Road 231 Bellevue, WA 98007 wt ~ , Project: #3181 Attn: Douglas Birch Subject: Inspection of Pavement a the Riverwalk #7 Addition An inspection of the pavement at the above mentioned site was made on December 12,1996. The following discussion will incorporate the informationavailable on cores as reported to Garry and Sons, Inc. in our project #3170 and construction notes taken by Inland Pacific Engineering. . • . , Paving Conditions ~ Based upon the notes taken by Inland Pacific Engineering, the weather was 50-75° F and reported to be windy. As the thickness of the pavement was about 2", the environmental- conditions were such that the time available to compact the mix may have been less than that within which compaction can be accomplished. Thus part of the reason for the low compaction data may have been the lateness of the year and the cool, windy weather. Sandusky Segregation. There is some areas that are segregated. This is a cul-d-sac, which will have very little traffic. The segregation may have been caused from operator practice, such as not having the auger running while paving, or from the raking. If compaction is adequate, the coarse areas should have the strength necessary, however some ravelling could occur if compaction is low. The core identified as "Sandusky, East end" was under compacted, which is close to the area that shows segregation, thus ravelling could be a concern. Edge Cracking. There was evidenoe of cracking along the edges of the pavement. These - are the result of lack of support as there is no curbs: I do not consider this as a problem for the paving contractor. Pavement Thickness. One core was only 1 5/8" thick. The contractor should remove and patch, or repave the cul-d-sac with a 1" Class G mix, placed in hot weather. If it is placed ~ in cold weather, or windy weather, compaction would be very difficult to obtain. The thin T j - • , - ; _ , ~ ► overlay would take care of any concern for about the segregation, also. Paving should not be done until the curbs are in place. Augusta Augusta appeared to be in good shape. Compaction was good, and there was only minor segregation. We witnessed a concrete truck running over the edge of the pavement to get to a lot. This of course caused some edge cracking, which is not the fault of the paving contractor. There was one area on the pavement with a standing puddle of water. This implies good compaction. - McMillan , Most of McMillan appeared to be in good shape, except for an area near lots 18 & 19. In this area the pavement had fine lateral cracks, which were probably from compacting too cold, although they also can be from mixes in which the gradation is over-sanded. The _ density in the area the fne cracks was also quite low. Based upon the weather conditions, I would suggest that the cracking and lack of density are a result of the pavement cooling faster than the contractor was able to get it compacted. Low density greatly reduces strength and will increase the tendency to ravel, especially in the presence of water. Low density also increases the chance of lateral thermal cracking. There was also some edge ~ cracking associated with lack of lateral support (no curbs). This section should be removed and replaced. A nuclear gage, calibrated to the cores that were taken, should be used to establish the size of the area to be repaired. . An alternative option would be to overlay with a 1" Class G mix, placed in hot weather. Rio Grande - - - This section had two of.the three cores that were under compacted, and one core that was too thin. The best remedy of this would be to overlay with a 1" Class G mix laid in very hot weather. This would take care of not only the above mentioned problems, but would cover up the coarse areas that could ravel. Potomac . This section was well compacted according to the data, and did not appear to have any problem areas. , i ~ ~ Robert L. Dunning Chemist - ~,l rr- 2066433475 MURRAY FRANKLYN ING F-054 T-116 P-001i088 DEC 24 '96 10:04 , . . ON ~ nt: (I06)64+=13Z3 • Fax: ( 206)643-3475 • 14410 StI-Red Rd, Suicc 2d0. Bcttevuc, VA 98007 • Pf►o ~ ate: /02 c , Fax to.. . C~O S'S Company. . . ~ 6-3 265 . r . ~ # of pages sent. . Fax fron~. . ~ . Company. ~ . - Regarding• . . . ' PAA JOB # Mem.o: yjW& , CC: Ust Initial s 'r fX ell~ d T 7, V Sencler`s Initials: ~ . ~ ; - 2066433475 MURRAY FRANKLYN INC. F-054 T-116 P-002/00$ DEC 24 '96 10:04 Pacific I'roperties Incorporated peoember 24,1996 Pltrpprty DtvtlOjymr►tf CQnstruCtivn Manapment ('j8rty dt $OlLS GtQeral COIItxgdOfS 24 N. Sy+cemore St. Spokanc, W,A, 99202 - ,A,ttn: Dave Goss • RE: Riverwalk '1*` ,Additiai Dear I?ave; We have boen un£ostned bY SPakme Comty sad Imland Pacific Engineering that thcrc are sme dt8ciaicies with rcgard to the sanitary srww system. These nood to bc mroctcd privx to the oounty ~oo~Rin,g tlie sysiem and issuing side sewer pamits to the buildcxs. . . Thece are 4 sid+e sewas whids aood to be extendsd. Thc sewer lines aad manholes need to be cleaued. : The tnanhole ciags meod to be grouted aAd thc sawa lines meed co be re-I'V'd by the oounh'. ,Also there are saae md,e sewet stubs, Per Ym 2"yt4" Anarkers, w6itch were iastnlled with tevearsz fall and sosne which may nvt serve a hause wiith a basantmt. We are sure the.se arejust enwrs in the markas, hvwava. , the side sewas aeod to be cxposvd and verif ed by IPE. Wa hav+e been 'oa District ~Io.19 that tb~ey are cuaoe~ned that ~e service iun~acmed bY Consol~dated ~rrtgatz - liunGS and hydzant nms not backfilled in the ateas vf the utilia trmch~ ~~7/9Per 6. ~ have~d~ • the ulility aaa~es in ma~ areas can be back£ilicd and sb~oul with Frank Mebnd of WWP aad they have sanded the utility lines, how+evet, he, cautioncd me that some o£ the backfill mntcdg on the sides of the trenche9 is fivzau and needs to ba braken up into small pioces befare usintB as bckfiu mBarW in the treaches. This wagk shauld be vomdinatod with IPE and WWP sa as noi Lo buM areag 1NWP wamts le$ open or is not propetly sand bodded.. VI/e and TYE bave fazod Yat this infvnnatiaD earliet. Hfowever X am enclosing the doaumaits again fog' . . ym infamatiasn. These deficieacies are causim6 us nvw aud we requGSt thCy be oomplcted by 0197. If You are uttaDle to corroct these dcficiaacies prasapdy, we will have them corroetod and dodud &om manies due Gam 8t Soas. Ptease tespoad to this request prOMPtlY, if you have aW qutstions please call me. Siuioarel~y; bnc. ~ Pca~Z4L ~ di, CWsauction Mana$er . Doug Bir AgEUt fa' Parkland Hmts, loc. _ cx: Niike Atiller, Patific Properties 14 410 B c 1- Re d R o a d T'Cld Stilesv L4*'W & AnnS'p' set i er p e. wA 98007 Tudd Whipple, Inland Pacific Eagnaoermig ptiore (206) 614-2323 ( ; pAX (206) 643-3475 , Waa95/wdlas1u01 r ' 2066433475 MURRAY FRANKLYN INC.F-054 T-116 P-003i00B DEC 24 '9b 10:05 ~ . • ,.""°a ~ ~NLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, 1NC. ~ Decesnber 13, 1 IPE Job #96070-1 , s Pacific Properties {nc. 14410 6ef-Red Road Beilevue, WA 98007 Attn: Doug 6irch RE: Rjverwalk 7th Addition (PE-1414-81 ) Sewer As-8uifts - Dear poug, At your request I have compteted the foltowing list with the msnicnum design etevation listeri in the last column. We calculated the design elevation from the standard detail shown on the pian set. (Copy attached) V11e assumed that all conneciions were made with the side sewer entering into the main line at the top of pipe as shown with the - middle option on the detaii. LOT # BLOCK # Oepth trom back of curb or E.O.A. Qesign Depth 2 3 5.4' 5.44 19 1 7_6' 9.28 15 8.9 9.86 9 5 6.8' ' 9.74 6 2 6.9' 9.06 8 7 5.9 5.21 9 7 4.9 5.24 10 7 4.3' 4.93 11 7 5.8' 4.64 1*2 7- 7.0' (neverse flow). . 4.76 ~ 3 7 8.1' (reverse flawj 3.93 14 7 5.51Eeeve.`u -t4") 4.61 't 5 7 8.0' GReyzfse -P~w ~ 7.32 . 17 7 T.2' 8.07 2 6 6.8' ~ 8.26 1 5 7.4ae~4e"«-7.37 4 5 7.61 7.66 1 7 6.1U~'•'~~ ~law5_36 . 2 7 6.01~!evcnc Pow 5.54 3 ? 4.'1' 5.17 a 7 4.2' 5.54 5 7 5.1 ` 5.56 6 7 4.5' - 4.93 7 7 4.4` 5.01 . ( ! . - . 7071Mest 7th • Suit't 200 2020 l.akewood Driv'e • Suite 20S SDOkarre, WA 99284 Coevr d'Alenc. Ip 8381o 509-458-68a0 • FA7C: 509-456-6844 208-765-7784 • F/1X: 206-769-7X77 ~ 2H66433475 MURRAY FRANKLYN INC. F-054 T-116 P-004i008 DEC 24 '96 10:05 ~ , ` d . . ' AS-bUllt _ ~page 2 We have received cvmments from Spokane County conoerning the as-built drawings. We are wortcing on our corrections now_ There are four lots with servives the County wilf not accepi until the senrices have been extended to 10' behEnd the righi of way line. i will forward a defiaency list to Garry and Sons for correction. The four lois are; Lot 6, 6iock 4 Loi 9, Block 2 , lot 7, 6lock 1 Lot S, 81ock 4 ff you have any questions conoeming this matter, please feel free to call me ai our office. . ~ Sincerely, . ~ inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. . 6ruoe a. Haward Pcaject Engineer file - ~ c 'to.w u~ COUNT`f RQAD RIGHT OF WAY ~ 4R PRIVATE ROAD EASEMENT PRNAIE PROPER'i`f 1 g$,g~17~.4 :N~ m ~ ~ . PR4PERIY LINE ~ 4 x4 W000 MARKER POST INSTALLED 1NSTALL SEWER SERVICE TO A MINIMUI~ ~ PLUMB, LENGT}i AS REQUIRE0. MARK ~ - OF 1 0' BEHIND THE PROPERTY LINE 4R N L~f~GTH WRN BIACK CRAYON AT ONE THE EDGE OF 51DEWALK, WNICNEVER 1 r u F001' INTERVAi.S MEA5URED FROMI D(TENDS FAR'fHE5T INTO THE LOT, w 80TTOM, (PAINT EXPOSED PORTlON ~J A OF OPROSITE SIOE WiTH FlUORESCEHT ~ GREEN PAINl'.) ATTACH 6 GAUGE W1RE ~ 2' M1N. ~ m WITH No. 16 COMMON NAILS. ~ 188,9/1 S.7 )N., EXIST. MH 7 - - - . .Y SIDE1~lALK WFlERE (RNERWAUC 1 ST A4DN.) ~ PR4POSED 5TREET ANQ CURB ; APPLOCABIE 9' QESIRED MIN. DEPTH. DEP'fH ~ MAY BE ADJUSTEQ UP OR pOWN un 22 1/2' BENDS BY ENCINEER TO ALLOW FOR r--"- m AS REQUIRED 'fOPOGRAPHIC CONOItiONS OF PRiVATE PROPER'TY, TYPE OF ri gl S1'RUCI'URE 70 6E SERviCED aN0 CAP NNN. THE SEt-BACK OF' THE STRUCTURE - 6" X4" 'fEE TO BE 5ERVlCED. . ~ , r5 J Z _ " - ~ ~ Z a! avc sEwER sERvicE . , PIP£ MlNIMUM SLOPE 4"x8"x2" CONCRETE BRICK Z 0,420 FT./FT. ¢ ~ ~ 4" PVC 5EWER SERVICE PIPE TO BE USEO WHEN DESIR~D MINfMUM DEPTH OF 9' At PROPERTY I,INE IS NOl' AVAIIASLE ~ OR WHERE hWXIMUM POSSIBLE QEPTH 0F SERVICE !S . ~ REQUIRED. MINIMUM SLOPE OF ,010 FT,/FT. MUS7 8£ INSIAtLED USiNG A SURVEYOR'S LEVEL FOR THlS CONNECTION. ~ ~ . TYPICAL SEME13 SER"y" CE M M ' ~ a ~o m N ` , . . • ~ : , f.. F-054 T-116 P~g~e~ ~L YM iNC' P.01 MU►1K~Y FRANK e,6''b4.5s475 ~ pWiFiC ~ . : I tyi.f~ ` PFC--1995 o9tAO . ~ °A`-M . ~ . ~ . ~co, ~pa~'~200 ~Tt.l-h Avs-• 707 V49A SOM $p"*' ~ ~ . 70 --j 45"~ e F~, LO Pa~ rZe ~ . ~ ~-u~ ~ . . - C Ar ~ ~ . . ~ - ~c . . , . er ` ~ . o,,,,,~~.j~~~~• ~ ~ 76T'~ ~ ~ ♦ . • ~ , siat4 ~ , • FAA ~ ~f - ~ ~ I January 7, 1997 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ~ IPE W.O. 96070-1 Dave Goss - Garry & Sons General Contractors 24 N. Sycamore Street Spokane, Wa. 99202 . RE: Riverwalk 7th Addition, Construction Punchlist Dear Dave: At the request of our client Pacific Properties, I have compiled a construction punchlist for the above referenced project. The punchlist corresponds with the bid proposal schedules as close as possible. Please let us know the status and schedule for any corrective measures that will occur. We will need to maintain our inspection duties on all work being performed at this "site. - If you have any questions or comments concerning this punchlist, please feel free to give me a call. If you require any construction staking to complete any of the punchlist items you can reach me at our office. ~ ~ Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. ~ - Bruce A. Howard Principal cc: Doug Birch, Pacific Properties enc. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 r ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist December 30, 1996 The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a guideline, it may not include a11 aspects of the construction as many items are not identifiable due to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. . Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction and backfill of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compaction and backfill. 8. Install Type III barricades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) Schedule II: Sanitary Sewer (See Spoka ne County letter dated 11/26/96) 1. 8" P.V.C. Sewer Pipe; A) All sewer lines are to be recleaned from rocks and debris. B) All sewer lines must be re-T.V.'d. 2. '48" Manhole Type 1-485; A) Adjustment rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. B) Manholes must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. 3. 48" Manhole Type 1-48D (over 10') A) Adjustment rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. B) Manholes must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. 4. P.V.C. Side Sewer Services - A) The lots listed, per Pacific Properties letter dated 12/24/96, require the side service to be verified for actual depth, Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block 7; Lot 1, Block 5; Lots 1& 2, Block 7. B) The lots listed require extensions to 10' behind the right of way and marked in - accordance with the plan set, Lot 9, Block 2, Lot 7, Block 1, and Lot 6, Block 4. C) The tee or wye location for Lot 19, Block 1 needs to be located for the as-built drawings. Schedule III: Storm Drainage 2. Filtration swales A) All swales need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' Ponds ~ A) All `208' ponds need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. ~ ♦ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist ~ page 2 - 13) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. C) All drywells and outlet structures within ponds or swales require adjustment to the . proper elevation. D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond "RT". . E) All 1.208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; A) All drywell adjustment rings require grout. B) All drywell metal frame and grates require grout. C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by - adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: C.i) The Type -B drywell in Pond "K" needs to be removed and replaced due to the barrel sections being placed too high, and the concrete cap conflicting with the design pond bottom elevation.. C.ii) The Type B drywell in Pond "L" needs to be removed and replaced due to the same reasons listed above.. - - C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate, and to be cleaned out due to excess material falling into the opening. C.iv) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires grouting around inlet and outlet pipe. The drywell needs to be cleaned out and a metal frame and grate installed. C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. C.vi) The inlet and drywell combination in Pond "Y1" requires the same items mentioned above , and to be exposed. The drywell is buried under a stockpile of spoil material. C.vii) The drywell in Pond "B" needs to be exposed and adjusted. Drywell is buried. C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. C.ix) Pond "J" drywell requires a metal frame and grate. C.x) Pond "I" drywell needs to be exposed and adjusted. 5. Spokane County Standard Curb Inlet Type 2: A) One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. 6. Concrete inlet Type 1 A) All inlet and outlet pipes need to be grouted, as well as adjustment rings and grates. B) Adjustment to final grade must be completed after final grading of pond or swale. (a11) C) Inlets must be protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all inlets) ~ D) Asphalt apron around inlet at station 24+73 Lt., Salmon River Lane is required. v I . Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist . . ~ page 3 Schedule IV: Water System - 5. Fire Hydrant Assembly; all require backfilling and compaction. 6. 1" Water Services require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) 8. 1" Irrigation Taps require backfill and markers for future locates. (a11) Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; . A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill. C) Broken or fejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: A) All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. B) Install all wheelchair ramps per Spokane County Standard Detail A-4. Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement 2. Interior Roads; A) Minimum density and depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets. The penalty and resolution to this item may be negotiated between the contractor and sponsor. (See Petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 18, 1996. Copy attached) B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. - Schedule VII:-Utility Trenching 1. Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. A) Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. B) Coordinate with W.W.P. for street light placement. C} Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. D) Coordinate with U. S. West for pedestal installation. Miscellaneous Items: A) Piles of garbage, concrete, and asphalt need to be removed from interior plat locations and tracts. . B} Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. ~ . i . 1~ INLAND PACIFiC ENGINEERING, INC. ~ January 8,'1997 IPE W.O. #96070-1 Pacific Properties, Incorporated 14410 Bel-Red Road Bellevue, Wa. 98007 Attn: Doug Birch RE: Riverwalk 7th Addition Paving Dear poug: . We have received and reviewed the report from Petroleum Sciences, Inc. regarding the pavement - at Riverwalk 7th Addition. We agree with the analysis provided by them, and propose the . following recommendations; Sandusky Lane: Two of the three cores failed to reach the required compaction rate of 92%, and one of the core samples was below the required 2" minimum thickness. The attached information and map indicates where the cores were taken. It is our opinion that the entire paving - area should be overlaid with a 1" Class "G" overlay in the spring or early summer. The total overlay area on Sandusky Lane is approximately 1,084 square yards. Augusta -Lane: Two of the three cores failed to reach the required compaction rate of 92%, and one of the core samples was below the required 2" minimum thickness. The attached information and map indicates where the cores were taken. It is our opinion that the entire paving area should be overlaid with a 1" Class "G" overlay_in the spring or early summer. The total overlay area on Augusta Lane is approximately 1,028 square yards. McMillan Lane: We feel the area in the vicinity of lots 18 and 19, block 1, approximate station 41+25 to 42+50, should have a 1" Class "G" overlay to protect the pavement from the visible lateral cracking pointed out in the P.S.I. report. The total square yardage for this section of overlay is approximately 389 square yards. The attached information and map indicates that three out of four cores did not reach the minimum 92%. These areas did have more than the required 2" asphalt section, therefore we feel these areas can be rerolled and retested with a calibrated nuclear densometer on a hot summer day to try to obtain the required 92%. The alternative would be to overlay with a 1" Class "G" mix if the compaction does not reach the required 92%. If the overlay option is chosen the total square yardage of Class "G" would be approximately 778 square yards. The area affected are stations 40+00 to 41+25, and 45+25 to.46+50. Rio Grande Lane: Two of the three cores did not obtain the required 92% compaction, and one of the three was under the required minimum 2" pavement section. We feel the test results ~ indicate the cul-de-sac is acceptable, but from station 10+50 to 12+59 we feel needs to be 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakcwood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 • 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 r - ~ . Riverwalk 7th page 2 overlaid with a 1" Class "G" mix to obtain the required 2" minimum pavement thickness. The total square yardage required for this section is approximately 650 square yards. - If you have any questions concerning any of these issues; please feel free--to give me a call. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. • Bruce A. Howard . . Principal cc: Garry and Sons, General Contractors Inland Asphalt, Mr. Mike Murphy ~J J ~ i 4 , ' iNOP, ? ~ , ~ 5r~r~'~r ~ f~C.~ 2 3 . • c r~ G o C A 6 j6~, :;,~r,~.~. o- 1 a i a ~''~'~'~~'~;':~a, P~ 200 G~K~c 1 9 1 ~ . - ,o0 12 ; u 20 S151 i ~ . ~ 100 ft 19 0a ~ 16 14 13 , $ _ js / , ;ia•'t~ 5 ~ 14 ~ %r►~~~~~~?~o ~ ~ 20 ti p ~1.16 :X. ~ 20 2A ~ 12 ti 15 5 ~ ti~ 22 2 ~q, ~ ► ,~p,~ r , 1 . ~p,C~ , ~ 0 1 ~ 7~ ~ 15 Z 3 . ~ ~ •w ~'M ` ° g ~ r„ r r h I r.►'~ ~I< N 4\ ,i r ~ ~N s 1 ~ ~ ' • . : . INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. RECORD QF C4r(VERSATION ProJ'ect # Name: Date: ~ Phone ~`Meeting Page I of ~ Person Galling/Called: Meeting at: Phone No.: Attendees: Subject: i~~rl-r7 1-4 ihtz i -7h c~~•i-~ ~ ; S ::tU7- A-p-t Ttt~ S • L,~t~I N`',~ ~~j~?~~ .~t~Z-~ :.~r?--~ _ ,~'~;.,..i~~~ •"?yT • ~~.l.~'~~T C~~ GtYh~ ,'fit i`'~'1"~r - ~~"'fr u~i~ .r4-- ~~?7~--~~i . C~o Cmf'F&JTW' . ~ --1'A~t~i1s.J~1 ~P~•~T . .~1(~,'T7.'v't'~ 3~T '1 ~D~I-~T C: t•c~f i 5f~ c=a...% ~ %~i?i~ s•s~c G.~i'~ . . c~ i Go t ~~:rt ~Y • - l~✓~t c~~K~izr..i ~-iLui?.~ ' CAII~/ c3r if%: •7-h7s i S<UZ- 1 S ~_r c~~-£> <Htwt ~ • - I~..~1' ~ ~~9ZT ~L.1~ (s~~~ ,4- s~~-r ~~vt2 r5/ bV5.~-~'Gt'17 • i.Z.% ~7~- ~'~t'l~%~ • PIOQ,4A T?-~c'l'L-l (Za'(r L htE pt;;'J4DD Wlh~ ~ , - ~'~~-t,~ ~~r•~~~~ Tn~ ezu~ u~~rlZ ~ c~Cr~ _ ; m> ( rqlv-vh_ (~.P % ' ~.Cla . Attested By: . 7',F`p ' Y~ ~'.;711•,~ I . , _ ; -t , ' ~i ~R~ r jll' --Y~.~ M~+.s P ~ N ~~~.~'~',~~~,~tl~ . _ :fi ~Ci~`•~ •1.~+ .ar', . r,,.~ ~ `g . ~ . _ ~ ~ y , f~~S',•~ t .T . ~ ~ i ` . rW'~3.va ~i.•i~l~.~ a~ w~,k:,~+v_', . , . • • y • ~ 3-.. ~i~..~ ~~i.L ~ 7f~` ~ . + . L. , ~ w~!,,•~ ~ ' ~ _ . ^ . y,, r.✓~j'k„ ' ~ 1' ~ ` • i;. p ~ ' ~ - . ' f.,~~^ 'i~~ . ~ - > iJ,"' ~ ~ , r - . . •f . . •r. , ~ , f ~,;.t.' . . `f~~ ~ . A-1~Tn PACC ~~SENGINEE i~ r~~ ~ r • N' a k . .F„~ _ 1 . . . ~ f~fi, y_ r~T~ Y't~sV%+k'1++-►.~.MJ''1{~r, '~.f~. F •~f~- S~ ~ ~,,i; „ •jTa; ~ ~ _'~r'1k '1~' • , ..,a . l. ~ •~Y' _;`,~,~*1~, y .iWCO~ ` OJ\ ♦ =~•~,~:.1~1~~~L"~~ +a.'~4~+~ 'y`~ r, ~ J~ ' . . Iy" r A~L~~0.1~ •r~c r~.. ` r • ;~'^f`~~ ~M.~L' ' _ 'L'./•'. ~ ~N~ ~ =T ~ ~ ~~l .,.:'X ~ ` . :r~r~fl+3~il.`: , ' ' - af~ . , y~r~}>~, ,--.-_-1~,a~.~ ~,~,pp• ^1 ; ~ _ .f,4~~, yM .~Y ' J ~N~7~. , . y r • t ' • 3 .k~ - • _~.1 . ~ , ~ ~ ~s.~.I` '~R~ . . - ~ ~ ~ `-z'="~~ awti . ' '•~y: i . ~ ' 9~r ~ ' i~ji , ' ' ' • `i , r~.!.~v.~+"rG.;~.K. _'!r~i~ . - ;~11. , ~ ~ - . ~ , -.ti , • ~ .i s 'r~ i ~ / 5~~~. • Pro ,'ect # Name:" ~ •4 ~ ~ lii~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~4? 4~ , . ' . ~ 'f , . _ . _ _ ' 1:.. Yap •i::'T~r! - . _ . . , r ~ A • • . . .,,>"r'' ,:~~i . 'Phone 1.000000100.0Meeting I~r'' y-~w~~*~~,~1. f _ 2e- ' l _ • ~iM~~~S~,N `~~•r S~'~ y . . .at• : Person Calling/Galled:~ Meet'u~g ~,~,~~':'~},114-"L~.: " ' + _ . ~ . , . ~ ~ , . ~ ~ y. ~,+k•~~f`' . - . " % Attendees• =k. . . . Phone No.- ~ . _ . • _ ~ . ~t. ~ - = - ~ - 'Subject: ~ f ~ ~rr~~~ .q •'y,~,S'.V~~. ' ~ 'C ~ ~ • - ~ ~ ^ _ ~ . . ~ '*•'i~ . .~~k4! _ , . t _ ~ .•i.~ - 4 t , ' . WC~-7- akJlgn" . c->,D S1TE 1'71SG.t.-I SS' . . ~ ~A dii -~S~G~ 7'a?.,4~ ti~,~}-r,~s ~ Pu.`.l~5 ' ~~.:~~~~i = A, • . ~ ~T{` ► ~t-E ' Z!7_C:~, -,j-o • . .~~~1!~~:;''~, . S TT7.,~mc-4-1 L,L._' - . . ~ ~ i~r:Y~ ` ~ i.• yl~ ' _ .,,~I T. > ~ . . . ~ ~ r.'~~F ' •V , ~ _ ~ Y ~ D ' . : _ . f~,;,;~ • - . ' ' «':a-~~'"' ~ • z x4L A~~ ~1~~~ ~ .~-~,c.~E~. _ . •o-+ ~ ~r d,~ ~ . . ' ~ !1 - ~ ~ G~ ~I~u~~ - ~ 1•y9~Jl~c..l+~-~ -rh~ , LA=:>l C_L .4 ~ ' - • h~: 1~1c /-f-~sa ~►~c~,~S~ ~ ~c~T-ir.~~-~ ~ H ~-r~sr.yr ~e-t- . ~ ~ ~ ~ 7?O~L~ ~ ' . ~ I%~~- ~ r,~lC_L'f"S. ~ - q,.~~,. ~ : , . , , : . . ,.f►: ~.t,-- _ . . -01 yr : ~ E.r ,~v ' ~1Gi.1 ~ -'=1 , ~ f~ di ~ a~~~=~ ~~~if' _ . 'b~ ' • , i C-~i` ~r; , , ,~c~~,•~ • -s; ~ ^ - , • ' } ~ Q ~ . . '7~::r='. • ,;-n ' ` rl•'4~ ~il G,~ :Y'?~ , ~`i ~~~Y`~," . - ~O ~ 4',~`.~'' ~r• t~ y. ~ ~ 7~'• y . ` ' . i . ~ ~ ~ _ ♦1~{~~" ~ • - 'h.( ~~t.-~•i ~ i• rr . '!''r~'• F..~Y1~ ~ ~ i •f ~ • ~~.~}t.lt.r ' . - ~ '±~~R'' J .'Y.`y,_ ~i, .~~.:1' ~ ,~y~'. . . . . . 1.~ • : , ' ' C.,,,C,~1.f,.i y' 'h'- . V ~ • , ` rJ i ~."~t"~`f~r~i~' - . ~_~r . . . ' ~ - • F}, ' - , =;4~ , ' . . , • . . , . . . - - . ~r~.: - y.. , . . ' , , . i " . . . . ' . Y~ . T ` ~ ~ v . ~ • . . . . ~If_ ~j ~ • ~ - , , ~ r _ . . ~ ~ 1 • . i . ~ ` Y~ • • : ~fy~.. ~ t~ M1y ' c ~ Attested By: ~ • w-• - . . ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. March 24, 1997 -IPE W.O. 96070-1 Denny Burton Mountain Crest Construction - 4204 E. Peone Rd. - , Spokane, Wa. 99021 , RE: Riverwalk 7th Addition, Construction Punchlist Dear Denny: In accordance with the recent work you have completed, I have updated the punchlist and attached a copy. In addition to the punchlist items, the sidewalk area along Mission avenue . requires further compactive efforts. Please let us know when corrrective measures are complete and we will schedule a reinspection. If you have any questions or comments concerning this punchlist, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, ~ i Inland Paci_fic Engineering, Inc. _ John McKerveiE.I.T. cc: Doug Birch, Pacific Properties Bruce Howard, IPEC 7 enc. ~J 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 • 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 ~ r ' . ; . . ° ' Riverwa.lk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist December 30, 1996 / 19 Mar 97 The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a' guideline, it may not include all aspects of the construction as many items are not identifiable due to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading . 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction and backfill of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compaction and backfill. 8. Install Type III barricades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) Schedule III: Storm Drainage. 2. Filtration swales B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' Ponds ~ A) All `208' ponds need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or ~ Jsod placement. Pond H requires expansion once adjacent basment is backfilled. B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, - and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate. C.iv) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires cleaning. C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. C.vi) The inlet and drywell combination in Pond "Y1" requires the same items mentioned above. C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. 5. Spokane County Standard Curb In1et Type 2: A) One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. ~ . • t ~ 6. Concrete inlet Type 1 C) Inlets must be cleaned and Protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter,fabric between the metal firame and grate. (Typical to all inlets) ~ Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: A) All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. B) Install all wheelchair ramps per Spokane County Standard Detail A-4. Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement 2. Interior Roads; ~ A) Minimum density and depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets. The penalty and resolution to this item may be negotiated between the contractor and sponsor. (See petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 18, 1996. Copy attached) B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. Schedule VII: Utility Trenching 1. Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. A) Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. B) Coordinate with W.W.P. for street light placement. _ C) Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. D) Coordinate with U.S. West for pedestal installation. Miscellaneous Items: . B) Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. . ~ , . ~ ~ . ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. . April 11, 1997 W.O. No. 96070 Spokane County Public Works Building and Planning Division W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: John Pederson. Re: Riverwalk 7th Addition - Open Space Park, Change of Planned Improvements from Baseball to Soccer Usage John: - . Per our conversation yesterday, I am following up with the submittal information that you requested regarding our request for a change in use of the open space tract within the Riverwalk 7th Plat. At this time we would like to request a change from the original baseball field that was proposed during the preliminary platting stage to a soccer field. Enclosed are three exhibits ~ which demonstrate the following. ~ Exhibit No. 1 This exhibit shows the open- space as-was originally shown on the approved preliminary plat of record, only enlarged. Exhibit No. 2 This exhibit shows the open space with the planned baseball field as final platted. Exhibit No. 3 This exhibit shows the open space from the RW 7th. final plat as proposed and . . configured with the soccer field. - As you are aware we are quickly approaching landscaping weather, and the Sponsor would like to finish this park this summer but needs a response in change of use from your office to do so. As usual, your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Inla Pacific ' eering Co . Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TRW/tw enclosures - Exhibits 1, 2 and 3 cc: Doug Birch, Pacific Properties .S ~ ifile 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 - 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 , • : ~ • ` ~ 4N L . ~90 ~ . . . . . G ~ \ . 00 4 00 z ~ 60 ~ Ln O -0 XL 6 ~ z 0 Lo c~l E ~ ~ • cO e/ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ w (V ~ .c~ 4,r) 00 X cr) j 0 zl 4~0 o o l _Q 00 ~ ~ \ ¢ ~ O ~ Q0 ~ ~ ~ l , N (_0 ~ . cD ~ ~O ~ 4-loo, SCALE: 1„ - 60, 0/ f, d ` ~ - EXHIBIT N0.1 ~ ~ RIVERWALK SEVENTH ADDITION \ 1 NLAND PACIFIc E NGINEERING P R ELI M I NARY P LAT 707 West 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 J~ PROJECT N0. 96070 oo/ \ \ Spokcne, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-684 4 Cs .57- BALDWIN~ LANE (PRivATE RoAD) 217' 12,464 S,F. ~ 5 j~3fi.44` 39.98' - -70.01'_ _ 36,72' 19221 MT, aAr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' D J ~ 10' WIDE . 4 N72• 47'? h . o~ O UTIL. ESMT.- ZO 19132 0 113,66, ~R) 1 N _ 19110 ~ o• 19124 ~ ° i ° z ~ ~ ' 13 N~ 12 0~ 8,051 S.F. o~ ' N02• ~ ~~2r' E~R) 1 . ~ n D q ~ ~ + ~ 32.88' ~ 13,699 S.F. ,p, 9,419 *S.F. ~ 7,874 S.F, g ~ Oo m ~ p ~os~ . , 19218 N m 14'~s,~c~, 2 N19'35'45W Q ~ 60.89' 70.01' 31,96' "Z ~ o A g6 N89'48' 15" E 130,90' N83' i0'3~ ~ w 15 V 1.71' y 6 ~ Of TRACT o o , (COMMON AREA) v ~ X 2.32 AC, , O Z = g` rD- ~ ~X~ rn ~ Z ~<1`~~ s~ 0.,o ENCUMBERED BY DRAINA E EASEMENT BAS E BA L L F I E LD J ~ O ~ ~p °CA°~ N y ~ , ~W g~~ v 7,693 S.F: SSAI , 25 ~u~~ W~s~r. 7 - J . ~ ~"5h oa S ~ ` s' N~ p o, 5. "17 ; ,853 S.F. 52.32 c- W 10 ~ o ~ ~ S2 3~69~ N89'56'36"W 145.33' 7' - 65.53' - 79.80' : -~i 3 Z O 7,847 S.F. O ~ z ° ~ ~r . •h 4 W : N ~ : ro ~ ~ ~ ~ 7.834 S.F. V. ~ W ~ 7 ~ :N D ~ \ScS ~ ~ ~ry ^ ~ ~ ~ N ~ v N 7,816 S.F. 0 6 ~ p 9,744 S.F. N • a p . r- . ~ ~ 2~~ ••~BJ ^ 1808 N ~ 8,283 S.F. 0 ~ 1802 ~ O ' •.2 ` z Z o 1806 Z ` ~ \ c3 ~ Z ' ~ ~ r1~ • ` ~ / cn %J mm~• /10 BALDWIN1 PRNATE~'RUr~D) 217.57' • . l IANE ( a • ~ 12,464 S.F. ~ S0~ ~ ~ l R 19221 ,36.44Z 39.98_ - - 70.01 ' _ 36.72' ~ ~ , aFj ~,a~ ~8 ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . *6:....... . . . . . . . . 4 4>>22Nw . 10' WIDE ~R) ~ Z urn, F-sMT. - Z Z l~~ 113.66, 0 19132 a s9 6hox °n , ~?>>>•-k~~~~ j ° 19124 ~ ° N 19110 Wo N~ 10 - o Z D~ ~ 3 o N 12 o N 8,051 S.F. o~ ~ N02' 11'27 E(R~ • 13,699 S.F. . . 2 ~ 0 Z 9,419 S.F. 7,874 S.F. 32.88' 00 ~ 19218 , N . N rn n~ ~0 N 19'35'45" W ~y L ~ N~ 14 60.89' 70.01' 31.96' ~ , . ~ 96 N89'48'15"E 130.90' ' N83'10*38- w ,o 151.71S. g'l I ~ ~ L . A ~ g6 . TRACT "A" o , 600 (COMMON AREA) SOCCKR FIELD J 2.32 AC. . S~ ' Da O D D nr r ~ ~ C~ S ~1 0 Et~CUM~D BY RAINA E fASEMENT BqSEBALL FIEI_D bo , m y 7,693 S. F. R. .7 ,1 S S ~1o' wioE 7 ~ \/(,,UTIL. ESMT. , > , . ti~ s j •,~p~ .'~j ~~Q , S~ ~~5. / ;o , q(~ so ~ ~~~o ,~ti 2 ~.1 •.~6, N7,5 . 7,853 S.F. ,w 52 3 ?'1 2~w 104 . . n \ ~'•.,,s IP ? g2 J 69~ N89'56'3G'W 145.33' ~ ' ~ ~ A ~ ( ~'~?o ,\ryv`- ~ 65.53' 79,80': -ni cn .s 3 Z 7,847 S.F. ,hry O~ ~ 0 Z II. ~ ~8 h N 4 ~0) ~ ~ , . ~ ~ 7 ~ 5 W ' . ~ ~ ~ T • ~ • ~ ' ry ~ 7,834 S.F. ~ oU-) q 9,744 S.F. p N 7,816 S.F. 6 g ' . V. o rn ~ o 1802 . w . ° ~ 1808 (~~J r 8,283 S.F. oN o 1806 aZ z ~ c3 z \ ~ • ' ' `_1-- i Q "'r~ • 'y,•~~ ( ! fr r / V ,C• _ + . . r~'e ~ a~~~ ~ , • . - 1 f ~ A ~ . , . i t l t PI-op(?rtl<'4 0 o L(1~:c.11 {_~U:'l:t`t~ April 14, 997 Artistic Landscape ' E. 11225 36`h Ave. Spokane, WA 99206 Attn: Allen Arnold Re: Riverwalk 7`h Addition Dear Allen; Attached for your signature are three (3) copies of our contract for the landscaping on the referenced project. Please sign and return all three (3) copies for Parkland Homes signature and we will return an original signed copy for your records. We will need you to send an insurance certificate, naming Parkland Homes as additional insured. We also request you provide us with a construction schedule. ~ Inland Pacific Engineering has informed us that the baseball field can be change to a soccer field which .you indicat e d wi l l b e less money. Onwe In lan d Paci fic Engineertng has con fi r m e d t his wi t h Spo kane County we will request your design and price adjustment. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at our office or my digital pager # (206)541-9271. Sincerely - Pacific Properties, Inc. / • Doug Birch, Conshvction Manager Agent for Parkland Homes encl. cc: George Reece; Parkland Homes Mike Miller; Pacific Properties Todd Whipple; Inland Pacific Engineering R+►~-~~i` ~~,_J410 Be!-Red Road Bellevue, WA 98007 Phone (206) 644-2323 EAX (206) 643-3475 W in95/wd/ArtLltr01 kg~ . r . M-1 ' . M ~ .K~ ~ r cY a_ . i:S. ~'ftr. ji'. . . •r... i i~A~ n W..:'~. . k . E.F.%'K.. « .w ~1^:~~~T'~l<~ • i w•5'F5: t . 4V_ . 1. . .i. . w.C 41 PM `TEW 1 1g9~ " C: L:V,: ~ ~ _ . _ . . ` S P O K A N E ~ C O U N T - BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DutECrox DENNIs M. SCO'rr, P.E., DtttEcl'oR emo To: John Pederson From: Louis Webster, AICP Associate Planner - CC: Todd Whipple, IPEC Date: April 29, 1997 - Re: Rivennralk 7' Addition In response to the April 11, 1997 letter from Todd Whipple of IPEC. I approve the change of use of the open space tract within Riverwalk 7`h from a basketball court to a ~ soccer field as this change is fundamentally in keeping with the spirit of the original approval. r , I remind the applicant that the cost estimate to be submitted in conjunction with the Landscape Plan should itemize the costs associated with improvement of the soccer field in addition to the other costs associated with the landscape and site development plans. ~J • Page 1 1026 WFST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPoKANE, WasHrrvcTOrv 99260 PxorrE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4903 TDD: (509) 324-3166 1A ~ ~ PHONE (509) 534-2657 CONTiiACTOR REGISTRATION pIN-LA-NA-'304K5 FAX (509) 534-9787 Inland As"6phalt Company SINCE 1934 . 5111 E. BROADWAY • P.O. BOX 3368 • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220-3366 ...ti` 0 May 20, 1997 VPAI 2~ 19 N~ ~ • ~r' ~ Mr. Dou9 Birch ~ - ~ Pacific Properties, Inc . ~ 14410 Bel-Red Road = - Bellevue, WA 98007 ~ _ . Re: Parkland Homes Riverwalk - 7th Addition . Gentlemen: On Friday, May 16, all corrective action as listed in our February 27, 1997 correspondence was completed and the work was accepted by Bruce Howard of Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. We were glad the weather cooperated and the work could be accomplished prior to your June 15, 1997 suggested deadline. ~ We request that the $10,750.18 (plus interest) being held in a trust account by Lukins & Annis be released to us at your earliest convenience. Sincerely submitted, INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY - ~ - ~ R E Wild, P E Vice President REW/su c: H E Stiles, II Lukins & Annis - ~ Bruce Howard Inland Pacific Engineering ~ Michael K Murphy, President ~ Inland Asphalt Co An Equal Opportunity Employer 1 _ - ~1~~ ~i~ ►~LS , ~F~ - r ~ - ~.~s~~ o~.~ ~v~~ C~. . hA~cmotAC- &i. ILVC 1- ~~~to~ C~. . ~Z~~ / C►~. l~-( e~•l c..vf,.~~ 1~-b~ 1~v~-~►~cr~-C, L44yv t- t~.~t~6~►c.~.~.~ c~,~ C~. 1~~ ~~+b ~ 1.,A~u~. ~ 1.~. ~~.o~~ I- I..~~E1.{ t~-c_.~,.i C-.~.1~ • f~o~~ ~~u~~ l.rt~..~~ ~ tii , t~~) AcxtoA'0-r L.+,.r -v- 14, -1-4c4>) / ~iAc.mw Avat. I.,~ ~ ~F- ietx>) O.,rz- L-,;.~~~ er. I&DO) r~~ t SLr 19 vDc>) ~ 0-4t4z6a>~,j <'qvvuLAa ~0. 2qLv{'z>) 6j- "Isstco-i A;ov u~ ( Ls. 0-ka'17--r taa7.►~ ~m• 15CX=) MLA."Itf Cti, r4 t..ox.fc ( 97. 7-<4 7cr->) t- l-~vozz-c- 1t,,jc~ Z`-Zc'! ~~~,,-Je Ho~rroz- Gr~.r6: C X1. lt4t>0) ~-~►~rc> LA-xjz L~. ZqLvcr->) t "Lotze~ cyt7jar C~J. 1) E - ~m~,J,-P~d-r Vi~~ ~jQE (IJ. Vz,=C~) L0,itr- Zq3c>c> 1..*..co L,j . t2~) [-e,,ja:7 97. Zq -i~) / W,NeGR0srrV_ t..~+J C C IJ • i 2-r>t-s. , - Post-it° Fax Note 7671 Date 1,,, pages , To From . ~O. .ColDept. %00b'-- Phone# ~l~ Phone # c.~-~j ~v n&Yc-f (-N - , Fax # 53 ;,i~ ?„(„t I G-'> Fax # J ~ . inland MEMO ❑ PROJECT.~~~ P a C I f I C CALC. ❑ JOB N0. SHEET OF ~ En ineerin g g M E E T I N G ❑ B Y D A T E West 707 7ih, suite 200 spokane, Washington 99204 OTHER ❑ CHK'D BY DATE \ 509 458-6840 Fax No. 509 458-6844 ~ ` . , ~ ~ . - ' ^ - . . , ~ . . . ~ ~ . , _ ~ , r. . • . ~ ~ ~ 1 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: M-1 K-i 0+.- ` V%t"A C*1;~Ir t.r(1~oZ- Lr. #-I A, ►-1. DATE: I.P.E. PROJECT 4)LeD 4-o r ATTENTION: PROJECT NAME: Description ~ , M"~Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ - M~ M~ Work Authorization M ~ Report No. Copies Description 31>.r- 3 PUI"pOSe . ~ Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval M I Signature & Return Remarks .,j -r~► 'enrlc.#7 ~ ~~i~S ~ 0.44. . , I ~ ~C/~ ~ ~o ~ ~E:~!°~ ~=~tt,r.~-. - ~ Signed: cc: . D:ITRNSMi.PMS PM JOB # ,,r,, ~.,~s:s a~~ ~ r CC: l.ist Initials Project No. 1736-01 Memo/Report No. 1 ~ GIFFORD C,O:NSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical En_ZAne.ers_• ~ N, ,E.2020 Springfieid ~t~~ •Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99 09) 534-36'Ta~ - ~ MEMORANDUM . INSPECT~W~'~RT ❑ ~ • To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Friday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 9, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Initial Site Visit I arrived on site at approximately 4:00 at the request of Mr. Jerry Peterson of Inland Pacific Engineering. The purpose of the visit was to get soil proctor samples for _ compaction testing of the area and initial site investigation. The soil contractor for this project is Garry & Sons Contractors. Upon arrival on site, I spoke with Mike who gave me an initial tour of the area. Mike reported to me that the sewer line had already been laid and approximately 10-14 ft. of compacted fill and been placed over it in a series of lifts. They were currently placing the water pipe on the right hand side of the road on top of the compacted fill. They were also in the process of placing manholes and thought that they would be completed on Monday or Tuesday. One manhole (192.0/17.1 N) was missing the concrete floor and appeared to have had the pipe cut out of the center of the manhole, see previous note sent of 8/9/96. Mike said that the pipe had not fit correctly and that corrections on the area were underway. I then met with Mr. Dave Goss, the superintendent of the project. He told me that they planned to add natural fill up to the water pipe, place the water pipe, add sand fill around the water pipe and add a lift of natural fill even with the sand fill. From there they would continue with natural fill in even lifts until they reached grade. I explained to him that I would be there testing compacted approximately every 200 ft. of every lift per county standards. I made arrangements to return on Monday and begin testing then. Off site at approximately 5:00. . ~ ~ ~ By....... ►'~.......C:.~?:~~-~-.,. Reviewed By: Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) . i Project No. 1736-01 _ Memo/Report No. 2 ~ ~•..3' - i,~~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, tNC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 * INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM _ To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Monday 707 W. 7t" Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 12, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Site Visit On site at 4:30. Note attached map for reference to this memo. The shaded area notes all locations where the water line has been laid and the sand backfill is placed over.it. . _ ~ 1. Fill varied in this area from approximately -2 1/2 ft. up to grade level around manhole194.2/17.0 N. 2. Fill all along this area was up to the top of the water line. The fill appeared to be new and did not appear to be compacted yet. 3. Same as 2. 4. Placement of the water line had stopped here. . Off site at 5:00. AV....~.......................... Reviewed By: 4 Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) ~ . / . ~ ~ ` _E ~1 ~ --r-'~ - I ~ ~ ~ . `N x~s20,/ 4 1.1 H 19 5 EX S7. 192.2~ 20.~ N ~ 191.6/21.3 • / 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 000, • ~ , ~ ~ ~4~ ~ 3 1 4 3 ~ ExiSf. (21 ~ : 2 (193.3/: -11 , 3 X ~ - - - - • • ~T. ~ i ' . ~EJ - T`♦~- ~ ` 1 ~ ~ 1 , ~ 3' / ~ l`~ o • z~~3) i - ~ ~ ,,~----L,~ I I ~r ~ 2 3 1 192.2/ ~ 20.4 N ADDtf6N, 2 (21 - ► ~ r81 ~ 1; 19 1. 6/1 a.5 N 7 C189,61'20.3 N>~. 3 4 S Q O a 192.5 19.6 j,.:~ F-~~ t7l ~ 1 _ 9 190. 7,/ 1. 7 1.1 N 71 101.1 ~ N 7H ~ 2 r 13 12 11 ~ ~ 21 H 7 10 ~ 14 ~ \,(21 ~ 3 ' 191., /1 Q .3 N I ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ / ~ ~ , 91.6/18.5 N) ~ ~ . / ~ ~ ~ ~ vv 4 • o ~ ~ Ir 1. ^ 45 5 . 1 192.0 18.0 ~ '1 ` Yv gg(z~ O 92.4 18.0 N _~-i i c•~ g ~ - 2 ` t90.8 /17.9 N ~N 7J 4 . - ~ ~ \ ~ ; 7 y ~ H 7 K 'S Q 7 192.9 ~v EX151• 18.3 N . MH 12 . I I ~ /•T ~7~ ~ ~ ~ 39 51 i.(H 7 11 20/1p ~ ~ tio MH ?~l _ I ~ ~ , ~ - - = 1 1 H 7 ; 5 189.8/17.3 N E 90.8/17.9 N) 12 ~ 6 1 ~ e ~ : 5 ,7 j 14 12 2 1 g ' g(181 , H ~ 191.6 17.3 N 7 0/ { 7 13 : g. 11 6 , ~ t M~6 182.4/17. _ _ ~ r, ~ MH 7P 191.1 17.6 N . , . , -5 a ~ 1 S0. 6/16. 9 17 . i 10 MH 7~ 5 ~ - 10 192.0/17.1 N 4 7 4 Ot> » 19 \ H 57N n717 3 20 3 ; 12 iS 21 2 192.4 16. ~ ~ MH 7D MH 7B 2 189.6/16.7 N ~ 1 13 1fl1/1 u 8.5 N H i F4 190.6 16.3 N .S ~ : ~ - - - - - ----~F~us7.-._.~.~.r------------------------------------------- MH 14 . ~ . . y ' OCT- 4-96 FRI 7:30 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS INC.~ 5095342925 P 02 :j~;~~.:•~•r. . , s~ . :~N .~fL.,:';•~* ~ ^ .;..T►w IM\~V~~'~ ~ i • •.r• _ - , • . . ,P. . ~ ' . ~ ' - ;~t'=:;t ~ f ' - • ~ ~ ~ . . . , .':_i:'~:.` _ ' . ' . ' ' , ` ; ,.'f;:i:.; • , . • . • - , . ' , • . ~ - - • ; ~.~g - n+~i , Jo . NO:~: 17 1 . . ~ . G • - 1,!AX1MUM, DRY . ~ oAYE OENStTY;' PCF SAIV~PLE N0. r~" ' = - ' , • ' 0?T. Yr.C.; 96 . ~ ASethod A-A 4 in. (302 mm) t ~ ~ ~ • . . . ~ ' 'rno)d: soil r.~2tcrial p2ssir.8 a • " ; ~ ~ ~ M5 mm (Na 4) sicvc o AASNTO r-99 . . ~ ~ O Nicthod e-A 6 in. (152 mm) AASHTO T-180 ~ r~ • ~ y . . no1d: soil mztcrial passir.g z ~x_ - ~,r- ~ ~ ~ 4.75 mm (T'a Q) sicti•c ~ ~ i=-• w r - ~ C~ ~ ~ , . . ~ ~ D Mcthod C---A 4 in. (102 n.:~) n ~ ~-i • _ ^ , o)d: - ~ :t-..',::~•:t' ~ - Soil m:tcrial passir,g t _`w ~•~h 3~ ~ corrPc ~h . 19.0 mrn in.) sicN•e ~ ' 1.""" ; • Mchod D---A 6 in. (152 mr) _ - ~ ` ~ ~t=- - _ . rr,old: Soi1 matcrial ptssir,g: . 1 9.0 mm in.) sicvc ~ It~t~....~.~'•~ ~ iioYE: TKF FoLtowsNG two tTESAS uvsY sE fI«EO OuT. _ S}~. M r ~.1.~~~ i t~~PLE O~,SCRlPTION 2~g•~° p~ ~ yr~+S.~~ = ~--r _ z;~ ~cown s 115h; l~iM".fa~r t31~ ~ g l 0 32 -~M~:«..: ...~..~iZ: re4~~71 ~ ~ + f ` _ •.i~i~t~ •(i'~' • Z S6URCE/LOCA710N . . . '1~~~^r~1:.~~ r~..~~ ~ 1. i~ 'j ~S~'. ♦ fT~ ^ rr.• _ , ~ . ' .......,J..,-.•~• . f- r-- ~S' `'-s~=~• '•~s:'. i_ ~ a=.:...~ i " : , ~ . 1~..+~-i-~Fi,. ~w._~l -T" S \ { ~ ~ 1 . • . • / • l ~1 , ~ 1f' 4' i~ - ' r~ ~ REMARKS :_~DaF~E~ ~ d G A . ~ ~ z-~ ,:,_•I f . . ' 4_ . t~~~ ~ ' . . ~'ttE~I L'v~it~T •~1ft.titi°1~ • ~ . TESr no. 2 s a s s 7 e WEt WT.4MOLo ~,53 2.70. 70 hSOLD YARE WT. WET %Vr. soIL wra 0 ~3 ~ ~ CONSYANT (V01.) UHtT WET WT.. (3711 . : ~ . PAN N4. Tj F i;/,T WEY WT. • TARE 1 ! 9-0 ORY WT. ♦ YARE ~ 5.5 t S ~ C~s~ Z 3 9~'~~ ' .1'!T. OF 1'dATER 2-5 ,3 ~ ~ ~.3 2~ : ( . - : . . rARE wr. oaY vrr. soIL - 3~3• ~ . ~ - - ~ . . 3(~6,10 N'YATER CONTENT 96 / C '~j ~ r~. v • ~ , ~ ' ~ . l'~ ~ 1 t t . . _ ~1.~ - . _ , , , . . / h ' UNlT DRY,WT. ~ 3 6 ~l~ -1~ 7r.-'0 3.~1~1:~, ' ; ~ , • ' - . t~ c• 'i . . _ . . . . ~i . . •r ~°>a r r% a I J 1 v i r r w m a.0 ~.viYOVL 1M fY I 5 11v1. j10y7D 6 4"Lyt~ 03 .►'1'i,~• ~.~'y"C~ ~ , • ~ . • • . ' , . . . ~ / ~w, •t• 'i.~, P. . , •-~'.1', : • . . . • ~~r:.~' ' - . . , • • ; . ~r~~,•, r _ , : 'S , ' , • , ' ` ^ ' . • . . Yn f lr~ r;.. . . . Q 1I✓0 - O JO ~z ~r ~ • - AXlh,vht oRY QATE ti DENSITY, PCF .',SAMPIE N0. 0; O? T. W. C., 96 = ' O 1►;cthod A-A d in. (tOZ nm) f - . J 3_0' mold: soil matcsial p:ssir.g z ; :.73 mm (A'Q. 4) sicvc O AAS ' NTO T-99 . pX;cthod B---A 6 in. (152 nm.) AASHTO T-180 ;ao1d: soil maicrial passir.g a ' ~ V 4.75 mrn (Nb. 4) sie.•e r ~ A'e1hod C--A 4 in. (102 nn) mold: Soi1 mitcrial passiq : - 19.0 m. rn (Mg in.) sicve : O 14cihod D-A 6 in. (152 , ~r,.) ~ ~ - s 1:j . moJd: Soil tnatctial p-ssi;,g a ~ w_ _ ~ 14.0 m;ri in.) s;cvc ~ ~ - =s: 1207E: TKE FOLlOK2NG TWO ITE1•t5 {AUST EE FIClEO OUT. ;c ~ =.y:~:=-'~~«:"'~•=:~: L'~~ ~ i"'_, - • AMPLE OESCRIPTlO slt'$hlry g1*1s~ ~11~Q AND ~ ._....~..a. . . :j• . o ,~ai ' s ~ • ~ ~ = ~ ~i^-i i : ~r • . [ . • ~ ~r~t ~~i• w~ S• • =~.~.i 1 ~ ~ ~ r •~~~•~~w • r,` - - : SOURCE/ CAT! N - T { •~..~~J . ~r i.~~..i:. =1 ; " - ~2 :~.~~I.~~~w.~~ ~ . f IS F • • Y .r~~ ~~~~..r. itiy ~~`.S. i~ Y , `J~ • ' I ~ ' • . . • • ~ . M ~ • ~r • 1 ~ .y •~r~~~• ~~%Y r ~ •-.~t~~ ~ -r+4 ..~1' t~~:r•~1~ • ~ 4. . ~ - i, ' • , ' . . ~s} ' ~~'---•~~,r'--r _s_-tL•-. ~ REMARKS ~0~~~~~ ~A/f ~~i~~r . • i~~r: • .~T~~ ,~,.~r 4="^•~'~^T~ . ~ . J - : . . . - - - , ' _ • _ 1 ~ ~..a3~ ~ ~y~ ' ~;-~~r. • • • r ~ . ~t i :i ti rt1t~ tL*it►? -~il►llh7~ . ' . I TEST NO. •1 2 3 4 S 6 7 S . WEY 1'1T, a MOlO 60 3/Fr3 ' -1~ ~ ~ it-ho1 . t.SpLO TARE W7. q,34 14 l134 ' If iLt WEr WT. s oIt tf ~ ui g q1q04•67. CONSTANT (VOl) 0333 fd3 3 s t0 333 14 3 33 : UNiT VI ET YIT: -Z7 4 9 3! i 4 1 l f 'T 2, . . ' PAN NO. kX GG E~ WET VfT.+TARE Z.q1i9 70V 300.3 32y"2 . ORY WY. ♦ YARE 2"+0' Z, ~0 ( WT. OF WATER ~ .l'ARE WT. '651 t Fl61 q K 3 9-57,2 cr- ~ oRY WT. SoIL ~ 1~6~ Z~3► 3 ~l(~►~ 216,5 - ~ . NYA7ER CON7IENY 96 q-. 5 ~ ' ~ • ~ . I ~ ~ . ~ ~ . uNiT oaY WT. _ ~Z, 1Z S,'-, , Project No. 1736-01 / A Memo/ Report No. 3 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 [~INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Tuesday 707 W. 7t" Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 13, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing On site at 7:50. Note attached map for reference to this memo. The contractor had brought on a 4000 and 8000 gallon water trucks for this project. A 48" and a 60" front drum vibratory roller are also on site. The lifts vary from -6' to -4' below grade. Dave Goss of Gary & Sons, said that they were attempting to level the ~ trenches out and by the next lift they hope it would be smoother. The contractor was continuing to lay water pipe along Baldwin Lane. Compaction was in process on McMillan Lane between Holiday Lane and Rio Grande Lane and was unavailable for testing. Two soil proctors. were conducted on the fill materials. The* natural fill has a maximum density of 139.5 pcf with a+3/4 rock correction and an optimum moisture of 7%. The sand fill has a maximum density of 129 pcf with a optimum moisture of 9%. I conducted 11 nuclear in-place density test at approximately 200 ft. intervals throughout the subdivision, (see map 8-13). The compaction varied from 94% to 100% with an average compaction of 97% based on modified proctor. One test was below 95% and was re-tested at 100%. Moisture varied from 2.5% to 6.6% with an'average moisture of 4.3%. I showed my results to Dave Goss and made arrangements to return the following day. Off site at 9:30. - s By........~.~:~'-~.?u..~........V.~-m~.~.,...~:..~,.1 Reviewed By: . Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) .;i i ~ ~ si• Y ~ ~ ~ +E20 .."T.~ r~ E)C $7. 19 2 . Z 40 ~ 191.6/21.3 ~ 20.~ N~ ~ - \ ~ ~ ~ ~ - y { 1 ; ~ , ~ • ~ , 1 : (41 / 3 JL (4 3 EXIST. WH 7 , ~(21 2 (193.3/: 2N ~ 3 ~j ~ X _ 6 - ~ E , ~ ~ 1.~ 1. t3 1 2 ~ r •~1 > 2 ~ (11.- ADDI 1 1V 1 192.2f20.4 N 3~ 2 ~ ; \ ~ . (2~ (gl v / ~ , 191 6/1 8.5 N 7• , 184;6/'20:3 N) ti, 1 \ 1 3 5 Q O a 192.5/1 fl.6 - ~ ~ • ~ - ~ / fd[ / _ 9 . _ ~ _ t • ~ J / ~ 6 2 t~H 71 (190.7/1 .7 N ~ - ~ H 7 H 2 13 12 11 }p . ~ v~ 1 . ~21te ~ - ~ " ' 14 O2 ~cr , 191. 19.3 N 3 . 19 1. 6/1a.5 a fV~v 1 ` ~ vv <2~. ~S~y o , 92.o/,e.o~ ~ 1 \ 5 t , ~ " 3 92.4 18.0 N ~ , 1 ~ lYt: - ~ 6 2 - ~ - ~ µ 3 140.8; 17.9 N - 7J ~!H 7K 4 ~ . - , s 6 7 192.9 JV 18.3 N r' \ I . ~ 1 191 .9/ 1 2 ~ 1 . • I .l~T v ~ . H 7 t ~ ~l t e Q 1 o m 7M H 7 1847.3 N E 90.8/17.9 N) 12 : 5 3; 0 113 ~ p 4 . 14 12 2 g „g181 . H '191.6/17.3 N 7 • t ~ ~ ~ . J 7 14 13 ~ Ma 9 t 182.4/17. MH 7P 191.i 7.6 N 6 ~ - • ~ ~v / a ~ 190. 6/16.9 5 fO _ \ 17 ~1 H 7~ I! H 7 192.0/17.1 N 7 4 5 18 1~ ~ 4 11 . ---I ' • H 57N n17 3 ~ O 20 3 . . :I~T, 12 15 1 z 192.416. ~ M~ T i J 16 ti1H27B 1 MH 7D 21 2 189.6/16.7 N ~b 1 H 7F 13 191. S/16.5 N ~ 190. 8 16. 3 N 1 O MH 14 . ~ . : . . ~c~ rJ . • ~ eli Project No. 1736-01 Memo/Report No. 4 ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ' INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Wednesday 707 W. 7ih Avenue,. Suite 200 Date: August 14, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: . Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane _ SUBJECT : Compaction Testing On site at 3:00. Note attached map for reference to this memo. 1. The manhole at the intersection of Holiday Lane and McMillan Lane was being worked on and the area was unable for testing. 2. No new lifts had been added at Baldwin Lane, Salmon River Lane north of Baldwin, or at the end of Potomac River Lane. 3. New lifts had just been placed at the beginning of Potomac River Lane and Salmon River Lane and were not ready for testing. A series of lifts or an approximate 2'/2' - 3' lift had been added throughout Holiday Lane, McMillan Lane and Salmon River Lane. I talked to Dave Goss about the depth of the lift at Salmon River Lane which was still un-compacted. He told me that the material was being spread out to the end of the lane and the final lift would not be that thick. I conducted 8 nuclear in-place density tests (see attached map for locations). The density varied from 92% to 98% with an average density of 95% based on modified proctor. Moisture varied from 3.69% to 7.95% with an average moisture of 5.87%, (optimum is 7%). I reported my findings to the contractor and told him which area had tested low. He said they were planning to roll the area some more and it should be above 95% when they were done. I made plans to return tomorrow and retest the sections. Off site at 4:30. , . - By...... ~.......C?. 1:....~..1 Reviewed By: `'~v... Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) ♦ . ' ••ti~_ I f ~ -E ~ ~ ~ `Q'~-r-' . .~r~"1 • ~ (41 I 90.5~/2. 5 f9.2. EXS T. 20. 191.6 ~ /21.3 / ~ 4 r ly 3 exIsT. 3 1~ ( • g,. , , ~ ~ ~ (21 2 3 ' . ~ ~ ~ r I . _ . ~ ~ y :t'C;•~ - ~ _ _ ~xkST_ e ~ • E ~ . ~ t- : . , ~ , . T-~ _ a 1 I ~ 2 1 3 ~ 3) ADD ~ 1 1 (21 1 s2.2 2 /20.4 ~ ~ r=, • (21 .618.5 N T g.6; 20;3 N)", ~ 3 4 _ 192.5 19.8 ~ r ~ C~ ~ 1 I. ~ ~ _ ~ - • ~ 9 2 ' H 71 (190. ' 1 . 7 w- ~ . . H . . . ~ Y3- `-12 11 10 2 l ~ ~ • • , ; ~ H 7 14 2 TmicT *e O . (Z1O ~ s• . ~ 191.19.3 N 3 f~ / ~ T[~ • /~T \ ~ ~ ~ D I . V18.5 ~ ! IMv~ ♦ /~/1 ~ \ •VV t 5 ~ / ~ T TR~dG7 '/l' (20 A ►s-~9 192.0 1S.o~r ~ 42.4 18.0 N 2 42 ~ ~ 3 . ` 190.8; 17.9 N 7J MH 4 5 192.9. -IV ~EX{Sf~` N . MH t 2 141.9/18.3 C~ 5 . ` , . ~ 20/ 9 MH 7 `r~ 12 _ , 10 1 1 H 7 i 7~1 _ 189.8 17.3 N N) ~ i17.9 \ 12 9 E• 190 .8~ : 5 3/ O7 13 . r , _ 17 te 4 ; - 14 12 2 I w tQ1.s/t7.3 N 7 ~ , ;s 61 ` r ' l 14 13 ~ EfT• 11 20i, . ~ -Q .6~;~U 192.417. : g ~ - - - i (17 MH 7P ~9ti.t ti7.Q N~ ~ , ~ ; y ~5 a ~ - ~ 19 0.6/16.9 17 ~ _r 5 ~ . 10 WH ~o ~IH 7 192.0/17.1 N : ~v 7 1e 4 H 7N ~17 20 3 _c1 T~ S -~:1 12 15 2 192.4 16. 18 21 ~H276 t ~tH 7D ~ . , 2 189.6/1 6.7 N} H 7F 4 S16.5 N J~19~ i v ~ 5 13 191. ~ i . ~ 190.6 16.3 N - - ~ ~ / ' ~ - - - - - ~ -----~-~T---------------------~~._-.-._------------- MH 14 _ r~~ . . . , ' ~ Locdtit eS,Jel l/ . P M . .l 0B ,3 13 rroject No. 1736-01 . ~cc: List initial, Memo/Report No. 4.5 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. - Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 sprin9fieid Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ~ INSPECTION REPORT Cl MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Thursday 707 W. 7t" Avenue, Suite 200 ;vv Date: August 15, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: ~ Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson ~1 • Holiday Lane ~ SUBJECT : Compaction Testing I made 1 site visit today at the request of Mr. Jerry Peterson of Inland Pacific Engineering. The lifts were at approximately 2'-3' below grade level. The material appeared to be well compacted, probing less than 1" using my full body weight on a'/2 " steel soils probe. A small amount of large cobbles (1 + ft. in diameter) were visible in the material. The area around the cobbles did not appear to be as compacted as the other material. I talked to Jim of Garry and Sons, Inc. and asked him if there were minimum specifications about cobble size. He told me that there were no restrictions on cobble size in the fill and it was natural for the area around the cobble to become more compacted with additional lifts. . I conducted 15 nuclear in-place density tests (see attached map for locations). The density varied from 90% to 100% with an average density of 95% based on modified proctor. Moisture varied from 3.57% to 8.2% with an average moisture of 5.38%, (optimum is 7%). One location was noted for receiving another lift without a retest for proper compaction. (Holiday Lane, + 100' from Mission.) I reported my findings to the contractor and told him one area had tested low. He said they would add some water to the area and roll it some more. By... V.:~~`.^:- r...L..T Reviewed By: uo Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) ; C• \~j ~a. ~ 1 ~ 5 ~4EX a 20, . , . ~ • ~ , ~v 4 0. 5j~2~ E x ~ ~ 5 . i ~ St 1 192. 0 ~ I 2 2.j---tq) ~191.6/2 ti .3 ! ~3_~ 3 ~ a ~T- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I { I I ~ .001 3 ~ ExiST. 4 , ( , I , I 2 1 93.3/- UH ~ 2 2N X T. ~ . E , ~ ~ -1~~~' - , \ ~ 1 i / a ~ • ` ~ ~ ` / I ~ ' ~r ` r~ ~ ,L 2 I~TQN ' 2 ~ (21 192.2/20.4 N) 1 3 • , ` ~ ~ ~ ~ (21 191.6/18.5 N " 189,6,~~^0.3 N),. 192.5 19.1 . ••-r ~ ~ ~ ' i 1 ~'3~ ' j:,; . ~1 90.7/1 .7 . ` ' ' ~ ~~5~~~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ r , . /j ~ 21 l ~ . 1~ / I T~T ; , • ~ ~ . / (20 / 191. 19.3 N ~ ~ . ...T ~ ~ ~ 191.618.S H ` . ~.K . ~ t21.,, v ~51`.;° 192.0 18.0 \ \ t Si ~ y~ ~ 'T \ ' vR(21 92.4 18.0 N : . • ~ , l . ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ s ` 19 0 . 8 j 17.9 N . . 192. µ . ~ ~ EXIST. 191.8 18.3 N ~.(N 12 / I I ~..y `~~j l /~T ••~V \ ^ ~ I ~ Y ' a v.+ 1lV1~,r I,i•('~ \ J ; / 18 l ti a9.s/i 7.3 N E' . 190.8,'17.4 u) , ~ 31, 17.3 N 5~t 81 191.6 ~ . ~ • ' 192.4/1 ~ - - i ~7 ' 191.1 17.6 N y i :5 • 1 S0. 6/16.8 N ~ _ 1 19 2. 0/17 .1 N " . 2 Y ~ ~ ~ i -3 / ~ • ~ , EX i ~D-~` . l~ f - 19 2.4 ~ l 189.6/16.7 N . % 1q1.5 16.5 N ~ J _~rr I ; j 190. 6/1 6.3 N ~ . -IF ML ~ r ~ - - - -----tiFauSJ-_._...._----------------------------------- MH 14 . . ~ . . . ' ~1 /J . , • ~ 1 • ~ V r~ ~/f:U/~L~ Project No. 1736-01 Memo/Report No. 5 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ❑ INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Monday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 19, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7''' Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Haliday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing Upon the request of Mr. Jerry Peterson of Inland Pacific Engineering, I made one site visit today between 2:30 PM and 4:30 PM. I performed 6 nuclear in-place density tests (ASTM D2922) on the lift that is approximately 6- 8 inches below grade. - These tests were performed on the roads within ~ the project site. Using a modified proctor value of 139.5 pcf, the test results were as follows: Test Site % Comp. % Moisture 23 95.0 6.34 `Approximate locations of the tests 24 100 4.66 are shown on the attached map. 25 95.0 ~ 5.59 26 100 + 4.42 27 98.0 5.90 28 92.0 4.45 Jim of Garry and Sons Excavation was notified of the results and he plans to re-compact the failing area. f~ ` ~ ~ Reviewed By: # Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) _ •t• ~ - ~ / 4 ~ ~ r ~ 7 ( I / 1~ E~0 / . ^ . " ~ 9 i;. ~ N (41 ST. 20.d N) 40 191.6/21.3 1~ / ~y - s~% - --.,i ~=T.. • , ~ ~ . (3~~ /I) 3 1 4 ~ . ~ • ~ ~ 31 ~ Ex15T. N „ ~ u~N 7 (22 ~4 2 (193-3/: ~ ~ . ! . ~ < ~ Y ~ . ~ . . ~ y _ XlST_ ~ - ~ ~ _ _ _ _ V E ~ • ' • `LA . . ~ B 1 2 ~ . 2 . - ~ . ~ AD~1 (21 192.2J20.4 N3 . • . ~ ` ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ i ' ~ (8~ (2) ' I . _ _ - ~v / ~ 191.6 18.5 N ~ / . ~ j ~ ;C18_Q,6it0.3 92.5 fi9.6 • 1 ~ ~ 1' / ~ 1 • ~ • ; ~ ~ • ~ , ~ (190.7/1 ~.7 N) Q~.ds es~~d ► . . ~ - ~ • v~/ ~ 21 ~ • ~ . ~ S~ j ~ (21 ~ • i ~ . ~ . ; : 191. 18.3 N Z ~ ~,'::T '.P"' .C~ X ~1.6ta.5 N) / ~21... -9 sOb TnAa •e 192.0 18.0 ? j ~ l 92.4 18.0 N ~ „ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2- 1 Q~ ~ 90.8 /17.9 N •0v 192.9 r ~EXIST. 1918.3 N. , - ~ µH 12 5 ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ • ` ~ _ . . . 18Q.8 17.3 N E r. - , ~ ~ - 190.81'17.9 N ~•4N , • j, ~ : 5 • ~ . n ;;5 lis~ ~ - 191.6ti7.3 N • ~ , . ~ a~ ~ : ►Ei.s s~ 7 on` 82.4 17. ~ ~ ~ • ti91.1 17.6 N • ~ ~ 190.6/16.9 N 19 2. 0/17.1 N i ` . V i 24 . ~ • ~ , ' ~X,I~T1 . . ~ 192.416. . i , 189. 6/ 16.7 N 1fl16.D-5N ~ ~ r19 ~ 1 SO. 6/16.3 N I - ~ ~ _ - - - ----~T------ MH 14 ~ , . % S ~i ,u%i' .z: ~i//ill/r 'i1.' ; i,r. • .'sf%/f ;c• ; Project No. 1736-01 ' ~ Memo/Report No. 6 i ,l'✓/F ~,~iii,~.~,.U~~ aai' ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ~ INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering DaY: Tuesday 707 W. 7t" Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 20, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane . SUBJECT : Compaction Testing I made 1 site visit today to finish testing compaction from yesterdays visit. The fill appeared to be slightly below grade throughout the subdivision. The water line is still exposed in places and no lifts have been placed above the sand fill. A series of lifts ~ were placed at the end of Potomac River Lane without compaction testing, last . -compaction tests were taken at approximately 5 ft. below grade. I re-tested the failing location from yesterday and conducted density tests on 3 other sections that were not tested yesterday, (see map for Iocations) The results were as follows: - - Test # % Moisture % Compaction 41 4.81 101 42 2.93 97 43 4.38 102 44 5.65 . 96 45 5.63 102 I checked on the progress of Augusta Lane and Sandusky River Lane but neither were ready for testing. I talked to Mike from Garry and Sons, Inc. about when they planned on placing fill around the water line. Mike thought they would spend the next day and a half testing the water lines and making all necessary corrections. He thought they would beginning filling the area about Thursday afternoon. I made arrangements to return T sday or Friday to begin testing the water line fill. ~ . , By.... .1 ~ rT Reviewed B ~ Y : . . Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) -~r `1 .~4`__y I ~ ~h % ~~20~~ 41 0.5,. a,5 N < r 5 ~~J EXST. w.. 40 ~ 192.~ 20.~ N ti 91.6/21.3 i~ ~ / / . r3~ ~ ~ r•- ~ ~~t f 1 \ ~ / ~ I I ~1 ` ~ I ~ ~ ExrST. 4 1 (193.3 7 ~ (2) 2 1 ` ' . 2NP3 ~ r y ~ C ~ ~ ~ 3 Y ~ ~ . AT. ~ 6 ~ ; ~ , t ~ --T_' ~ E ' \ u l•~•'%' ~ 2 yrr- ~ \ ~ 3 2`~~1~ ~(21 192.2/20.4 N) (Sl (2 ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 19 2.519 . C189,6/20.3 N)~, 1907~1 .7 N/ ~ ~ - ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~S" / . - , I . ; I ~ ; ~ ` • i'~/5 ~L~ ~v~ / 21 . • ~ , ~ ~ . ~ - Y~ 141. 1fl.3 N • ~ /i ~ . ~a JV1 ~T F« 1~\ I tJ t/ 1 45 192.0 18.0 ~ ~20 ~ 98 ~2) ~ N •t (~921.418.0 ~ ~ • ~ ~ 190.8/17.9 N . ~ 192 ~ / ~ ~v ;~~►r.~~1 _ ~I ST. 191.9 18.3 N MH 12 ♦ ~ / ' . - ..,T CS1 5 41 18 . - ~ ~ L J18fl.8/17.3 N E 190.$~-17.9 N) l : 5 t J~ . . ~ ,-l v6 ( 8 " 191.6 17.3 N ~ J 182.4/1 I~S fd 9 ' - (17 • ' 191.17.6 N -11 180.6/16.9 N ^ ' e)5 19 2. 0/17.1 N . 4 . ~ Y . w_~- . : 1_1 f ~ • 192.4/1 E~,T ~ ~ 89 . 6/16.7 N 1 91 .5/16-5 N ~ J~19 ~ ~ i 90.6/18.3 N 1 ~ ~ - T3vcT-wllr V7 \,P~ -TAL ~~EX1ST-------------------------_~...____.-._~------ kl H 14 ✓ ^ •~~r V i ~ ~J ~ . • . . . ' ' ~ ~ . r., r•.c 't . • 4 f' ~ / .cW' /iY ♦ ~ ~ . ~'~~Nroject No. 1736-01 , Memo/Report No. 7 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 0- INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Friday 707 W. 7``' Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 23, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 ~ Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing - On site at approximately 9:20 am. No additional compaction work had occurred along the water lines. I talked to Mike of Garry and Sons, Inc. and he said that they were still working on the water lines layout. He estimated by Monday afternoon they would have their initial lift in over the water pipes. Off 9:30 am. ` , . _ By..... .~.l~c.~?-U:,~ ....A......~.~'.~~^:~..,..,~...~..l Reviewed By: Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) ~ . . PM JOB #t j . I V V 76~-l • Project No. 1736-01 ~ CC: List Initials Memo/Report No. 8 ~ 9 i rr `fGIFFCQ CO ULTANTS, IIVC. : Geotechnical n~n ~ E.2020 Springfiel ' Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 14 INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Monday 707 W. 7t'' Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 26, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7t'' Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing , On site 3:20 pm. Weather was clear, sunny and in the 90's. I returned on site to begin testing compaction of the fill over the water line pipes. Upon arrival on site no new work had began around the water line area. There were several large excavations on Rio Grande Lane and McMillan Lane, (see map). The excavations were approximately 10-12 ft. below grade to the sewer line. I talked to Jim of Garry and Sons, Inc. and he said that they were having trouble passing*the sewer lines with the County. They were currently trying to get the lines passed and then would need to re- compact the excavated area. After the sewer line passed they would place an initiaf lift over the water lines, test the lines through the County, and than continue to fill the water line trench. I made arrangements to return on Wednesday to check on the progress. Off site 3:30 pm. . . ~ . By.....1 Y4...... GJ•'r.v~rti.;. Reviewed By: . . Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) EXIST H 20•/C r~~~ ~ ~ . .--1 . ~ ~ 1 ' 7 ~ 0.5- ,---4 :I ~ EXST. ! • . ~ ~ i , ~ ; ~ 0 I 191.6/21.3 ~ 192. z 20.~ N~ ; r~ - ~ 1 ~ 3 3 3 ~ Exis~ ~ (21 / 4 1 193. , , ~ . 2N 2 I ~ 3 ~ ~ I • " . y ; --1- ~ ,~;~•r,,=~- + X T. E - - - ^ - LA 1-•'~.' 00 a 1 2 ~ ( l~-•;= ~ ` , 3~3)1:. • . ~ ~ ' ~ ADt16 M (21 192.2/20.4 N) ~ ` ~ //i• ~2~ , - - - _ ` ~ \ (81 C189,6; 2Q,3 N),. , - - , 00 - ~ ~(190.7;1 N) c~ , r21~E3 21 •As _ ~ ~ T ♦ /~T ^J.• ~ / ~ , 191.6/i 8.5 H - . / . • ~21~~ 4g\~Y6 I57`~y 192.0 18.0 ~ ~ ~ ~L(1 . - ~ 92.4 18.0 N . Y,: ` ` 1 19 0. 8/~ 17 . 9 N .,EX1ST.' ~.cN t2 ~ 191.9 /18.3 N . • ~ ♦T ~ ~ 50/ , . 18 189.8 17.3 N E • 190.8//17.9 N ) Ji ` ~ . -%5 (18> - 191.6 17.3 N r v ~ ~ ~ t~R 9 ~r . , • ' ~ ~ ~ , _ - 192.4/ ( T5-~ 191.1/ 7.6 N , . ~ 5 ~ ~ • 190.616. 9 N ~ ~ • - ~ E192.017.1 :N) . .V ~ • 1 . ~ . 192.4/ ~ , ~ 189.6/16.7 N r ~ 1Q1.5/16.5 19~0. 6/16.3 N ~ ~ - - - - - _'_'----~FX1ST--------------------------------._._._._...--~._~_.--- MH 14 . . ~ ~ , ~.dC, ~ • •jf ! ~ . Project No. 1736-01 ~Memo/Report No. 9 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ' ~INSPECTION REPORT EIMEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Wednesday 707 W. 7`h Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 28, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr.'Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing On site at 1 1:50. I went on site to check the progress of water line testing and re-compaction of the sewer lines. Upon arrival on site, no additional work had began on the water lines. I talked to ~ Mike of Garry and Son, Inc. and he said they were currently filling the pipes with water and were planning on testing them in the afternoon. Backfill was planned to begin tomorrow. The five location where the sewer line had be exposed were all filled in. No tests had been conducted on the 12-15 ft. of backfill except for the final layer. The results were as follows. Test* % Moisture % Compaction 44 4.01 100 - 45 4.65 93 46 5.4 97 47 9.27 94 48 5.36 84 *See map for locations. I notified Mike that 3 of the test were below 95% compaction. He said that he would keep rolling the area. Arrangements were made to return later on in the week to check on the water pipe. ~ j By..T~.~~,...t~.....~?.~.~.,..~rv.n.~..4..I..l Reviewed By: Q.1................................ Im. Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) - . • k P M . • , . 1 _ • ~ ii ,~i ,~i~ j / ~676 - P cc: List Et;,-_ . Project No. 1736-01 , , . 2 ,y - • _ J~ Memo/Report No. 10 ~~o p•~~ ~ ~q ~ GIFFORD 6OIV~ T~►~1TTS, INC. Geotechnica/ Engi E.2020 Springfield 1~. ` Page 1 Of 1 ' Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 5A,3 70o 0 INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering DaY: Friday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: August 30, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 , Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing - On site at 7:30 am. On arrival on site no work had been started on the water line. I talked to Mike of Garry and Sons, Inc. and he reported that the water lines had passed at 150 psi and they a planned to start filling the trenches in on Tuesday. I re-tested three sections that had not attained 95% compaction on Wednesday. The results are as follows: Test Re-test of % Moisture % Compaction 49 45 3.24 96 - 50 47 4.91 99 51 48 3.84 . 95 (See 8-28 map for locations). I reported to Mike that the 3 re-tests were all passing and made arrangements to return Tuesday afternoon. Off site at 8:05. a * r B.....4~:~~r. ~ Reviewed By: Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) I - - - _ - ~ , EX 5 ~ ~ - EY~2~ E~'.3 ~ ~ 1 +~K a 20•~ 192 ~ v`::::-i-~c--• (44~ N (41 ' ' ~t`.= 2 1. g 3 2 ~ 1J ''r ~ ~ f ~ ' ► _ ~ 02 • - EX►5I • 2 r >1 / i2 g 2 .2 l24 4 ~ . ~ ~'1`~ ` • ~ S.5 K 192.5 1 S 2'~ 2 ~ q ti.6~1 _ _ _ _ " 189•6i 2Q"3 N~` ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ '7 : . : _ - , _ - - ~ . ~ / 21 µ A81,6/ta.5 b/~ . , ~ / 't' 192.0 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ :CV • ~ ` 18•0 N ~.~~~j / ~ i 92•4~ ooo~'~/ ~9 .00e i - - ~ 19. s ~ ~/1..vI~ • ^ ~ `1 \ t'q \ /,''•v ` f / ' y.l 7.9 N t90.81 . ~ ~-r.. ~ > ~ ~ , '~i N _ _ • ~.3 . ~ ~ + ~ ~ fy ~ ~ ~191 •9~ • ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ Mµ 12 ~ L-= ~-ol 81 17 •g _ 39 ti90. ,~C~ N E , •3 5 -7.3 ---t ' ` 191 * _ 192.4 5 : _ j_, . ~ . N ~ `~5 ~ ' ~p.fi/ti 6-9 ~ 192•0 17'A N ~ 1~x 1 / - - - ~17.6 vu. ~ - ~ ~ i - . . , • • ~ N 191.5 1 g ~5 • µ • K~i~ t ti 63 N ~ 908 •3 1$9 •fi ~ ~ : vr19 ~ ~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ _ - • t•. • _ , _ ~ • . ~~..E~ . , • ~ , . ~ , . , ~ • t PrA cc: ~is; i~~:~ Project No. 1736-01 ."AL Memo/Report No. 11 l ii,Gi' ! i • E:• C3 bf ` ~ ' ~ r`"fl J ;•v. ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield ~a&61 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ~ E') , y INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM'- To: Inland Pacific Engineering DaY: Tuesday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: September 3, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7t'' Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane ~ SUBJECT : Compaction Testing Backfilling of the water line had began. Upon arrival on site the initial lift had been placed everywhere and a second lift had been placed on the beginning of Holiday Lane. I conducted 12 nuclear in-place density test throughout the development. (See map 9/3 ~ for locations) Compaction varied from 93% to 100% with an average compaction of 97% based on modified proctor. Moisture varied from 2.1 % to 7.9% with an average ~ moisture of 5.2%. I notified the contractor of the failing areas, #52 and #56 and made arrangements to return tomorrow to re-test and continue testing the trench. ~ ' . . : ~ : : . ~ _ . - _ - _ . ; . ' . • • . • i . . .I : ' • . ~ . . . . By.....................:....!.......C..c........c!.•.-: .I..e.r.~............ Reviewed By: Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) \ • , i 1 1 \ - . _ • •_iY l / • . . 1~ ~ 4- 10 . ~ ~16AII ~0 '1.5 IdN 1 9~. 2 , 5 l Ex sz. ' N) 40 192.2 20.~ 191.6/2 t .3 ~ Y ~ •,r' ~ Jr ~ ~ ' • r .00r 3 ~ 3 Ex157. ~ ~ / - ~ • 1 - : ~ ; ►.tt~ ~ ~ . 2 1 2 ~ (ItN.193. 3 ; . ~ ~ = • :1:.~:_.. ~ X bT_ E ~ . . . ~ ~,t 3- - ~ ` ~ f3 ' . - . ' i~ ~ _ /~i~ ' yr.~~.L\ I r3) i ~ . . 2 ADDI ~ 6NI (2*) ti 92.2/ZO.4 N) ~ 3 I ~ 41, , 721 cg. 61 d.s H _ _ r- ~189,6; 20.3 192.5 1 . ~ _ ~ _ • /~'~,'i~~~ ~ 1 6 .7 N~ • ~ , . .•~ti~~ ~ ~,\S ~ ~ ~ 1 Iv.. / 21 (21 "ol . ~ T44c'T /~,-.'~~,~-~j~ 191.19.3 N ~ \ ~ ~ C~.a`ia.s k TR:.;;T Fr. ; 6- 1. 4545 142.0 18.0 v ` L ~21 gg ~ 92.4 18.0 N ~ ~ . , ~ Y~ ` ~ \ j'- c.' - 4•~ 190.8,117.9 N ' . ly-•~,---~- ' u3 19 ,ExI~ST- 191.8 18.3 N MH 12 ~ ~ L~ . ♦ I l /~T ~ ! ~ ' - ,9 1' \ • ! ~ .,18 189.8/17.3 N E 190.81/17 .9 N) 5 5 > , ~ 191.6 /17.3 N 9 ' ~ ► ~ r E~sT. ~ - - - - 192.4/ v , r 191 Y 7 .6 N , `5 _ 190.616.9 ~ L 192.01 7.1 N ' 'V E-X - r~ . I T 192.4/ , 189.6/16.7 N / 191.5 f 16.5 N 190. g1, 6.3 N s.~ L-- - - - - ~ MN 14 • I _ . ' • " ' ~ r~, . • • . q-3 , • , Project No. 1736-01 , Memo/Report No. 12 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnica/ Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 "EI INSPECTION REPORT DMEMORANDUM . To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Wednesday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: September 3, 1996 Spokane, -WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7t" Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing On site at 2:10. The water line had been backfilled to grade throughout the development and I was not able to re-test at location #56. Location #52 had not been re-compacted for testing. ~ Only one section was compacted and ready for testing. I conducted 2 nuclear in-place density test on the prepared section. (See map 9/4 for locations) Compaction results were 97% and 98% with moistures of 8.4% and 7.9%. I made arrangements to return tomorrow to continue testing after compaction was completed. Off site at 2:40. ~ By....... Tff-,A:ar.:-....!~......~~'::^:~.~...L...:~ Reviewed By: ..4a....................................... Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) : : ' - • = ~ ~ ~ ( / ~ 4: - ' - - - ~ ~p% ; N H I ~ ~ Ex , ~ ~ . ~ , ~ 5 ST. I ~ ~ ' 191.6 21.3 192.Z 20.~ N ~ ) r~ ~ ` / , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 31 loolli 31 ~ Exisr. ~ 4 . ~ ~ . ~ 7 ~ / . _ 2NP 2 I (193- (2 3 =1 ' a Y - . ~ ~ ~,r xST. , . . . . . ~ u 2 2 AD DI T 16N, ~ 21 ~192.2/20.4 N)l 3 1,:; • • - -,l _ ~ (g~ ~ 1 ; ~ 2) - : ` 'l--~ vi ~ - ; C189,6'2 0.3 N)~, / ~ "~~i ~ F-•~'~~ 1 ,o`I ~.5 192.5 ti 6 C190.71 1 .7 N~ - ' . • ~ ~ ~ ~~5~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ( ~19.3 N ~ . ~ 191. 6/18.5 N ~ ~ ' T~'] \ . 1 V V _ ` • / 1~„ i57:'g • 192.018.0 \ " \ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (2) 98 ~ T-) 92.4 18.0 N ~ ` - r/ v % ~ `~t i 1 ` ~ 1•' ~ ~ ~ 19 0.8/17. 9 N 5v ' 19 V E~C I 5~..,T\ l/'~ • \ MH 12 ~ 191.9 18.3 N . ~ : .,•T ` / 'R,,., . - ~c- ~181 189.8/17.3 N E . 90.8//17.9 N~ + 5 x I J' ~ 181 191.6 17.3 k . . ~ ~ APU$TA ~ • EXIST. ~ ~ ~ u.Q 9 192.4/ _ _ i • 191.1 7.6 N , 2 5 - ' 190.6/16.9 ~ 192.0 /17.1 N : 11~~ ~ • • E_x , T ~ 192.4 : M~~ ~9.616.7 N / 19i.5 16.5 N , 19 190.816.3 N ~ - - - - - -~--~~1~14 n; . Cr... • . ~ c/ . , 7 ~ { , i• l. ~ . ~ r • 1 ~ '~~a I - Project No. 1736-01 Memo/Report No. 13 ~^f GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ~ INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering DaY: Thursday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: September 5, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing On site at 3:50. I returned on site to continue testing of the final layer of the water line trench. Upon arrival the contractor told me that they only had one roller working today and although all ~ the material had been rolled, it might not have been rolled enough. I took a series of test A - to se-e which section needed more compaction. I conducted 10 nuclear in-place density test on the prepared sections. (See map 9/5 for locations) Compaction varied from 87% to 97% with an average compaction of 93%. Moisture varied from 3.6% to 6.7% with an average moisture of 5.1 Six of the 10 tests were below 95% compaction. I made a copy of the map and circled all the sections that were below 95% compaction for the contractor. I will return tomorrow to retest the failing areas. Off site at 4:50. ~ ~ ~ By.....T ....~...T.......... Reviewed By: Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) .r•a~1 ` f • •,t • ~ . _ ~ 5 E 20 4r+ ~ ~ ~ • , t- ~ ( 1 . ~ ~ 1.~ N 4 ~ ~ ~ ' WH t U.~, 2 ( J ~ ~ Ex ST. 5 19 2.(~ 20 N ~ 191. 6 j 21. 3 ~ ' / / ~ - - 1~~ I (31 (4) 3 ~ LrT_ e ~ 1, ~ _ I I=, I 1.`~ I- ~✓l ` ~ • / ~ 3 EXIST. ~ ; ~ • u~ ~ 2 19 3.. .1. ( . I Y ~ ~ • 3 X T. , - ~ • . ~ ~ ~ 6 - - - .l ! ~ i~ ` E ; , I~ 3•~. ~ t.-~,: ~ ;0.0 ~ 2 . yr-_..j` I 3)1 I:i 2 ~~~1~~► ~ ~~1`~l ~ iY ~ (21 192.2/20.4 N)~ 3 . , . i.• ~ ~ • • ~ ' ` ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~c • g ~(21 .S/t C189,6; 20,3 N~~. 192 / p (190.7/1 .7 N~ . ~ 15 41 2 1 • ~ w . (1a na~cr K ~ . - 20 ~ : ; \`191. 1 fl.3 N Y \ ~ " "I 191.a.s k "F" . ~ 45 1 ~ ~ ` g 142.0/18.0 ~ 20 -t'J r2 92.4 18. 0 N ~ ~ 9$1 / \ ` 1 1 ~ ~3~ ~ / t90.8j17.9 N ~ •c~'~ ~ ^ - 5" • ~ .'~i ST. 101.9 t 8.3 N MH ti2 ~ ~ . L6W , ~ 5~~ s 1 _ I ' ~ _ 1 IN^ ; 5 _ 189.8 17.3 N E 190.8 /17.9 N) _ - - ~ sH ~ yC (j fi) 191.6 17.3 N ~ , ~ r Ex)sr. ; 2.4f ( :'~s 9 . • _ ~ ' 191. ~17.6 N . t 80.6/16.9 92. /17.1 N tv~ 01 ~ . . T v .192.4 ~ ~ . ~ 189.616.7 N 1fl1.5f16.5 N `:L - ` • ~t ~ - 190.8 16.3 N ~ ~ •r 9 ~ _ i ~ ~ - MH 14 n~.- • • : a ' _ . ~ ~ i . Pm B CC: Lfst tnitieis ~f Project No. 1736-01 Memo/Report No. 14 . , P ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnica! Engineers E.2020 Springfield P8g@ 1 Of ~ Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ~.INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Friday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200,:-,,,i:~~ Date: September 6, 1996 J~~~~, ~v° P r o j e c t: R i v e r w a l k 7th A d d n. , WA 99204 ~j ~ ~ Ixr Spokane ~ `~n' ~ CitylCounty Permit No.: b 1gg~ Project Address: Mission Ave. and ~~P 1,..~ y Lane Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holida SUBJECT : Compaction Testing On site at 3:10. i returned on site to retest sites 70-75 along the water line, (see 9/5 map for locations) and to test the water line along Potomac River Lane. I conducted 8 nuclear in place ~ density test with the fo{lowing resuits. Test Retest of No. Moisture °!o Compaction % 76 70 4.0 ~ 92 77 71 4.2 92 78 74 2.9 96 79 . . 6.1 92 See map 9i6 for 80 75 3.4 96 locations , 81 73 4.6 91 82 6.1 95 ~ 83 4.6 95 I notified the contractor of the failing areas and made arrangements to return the following day to continue retesting. Off site at 4:20. By.......4,t.t:am-...... . A....... G~-►~c~.~ .I..E.Z.7......... Reviewed By: . 1~.......... Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) ~ . • ~ r ~ ~ ~ v-' ' ~ 5 E~ry~ 20,;~ - - ~ . • N ~ ' : uT` 90.,.-',~'~ 1.5 5 -c _ Ex ST. _I ~ 191.6 21.3 192.Z 20.~ N~ 40 / ~ ' ~ G`• (31 3 3 exIsT. ~ - - WH 7 ~ (21 ~ • ~ t 193.. 2NP3 2 ~ t I I I ~ _ E 2 "3)) 3 ti~ 2 .2/20.4 3 . r~ ` , 1 \ / 2) v ~ ~ ~ ! r r 191.6/1 8.5 N ~t fi4,.6; 20.3 N~~. 192.5 1 . ~190.7,/1 .7 N~ . . . . ~~5~/T ~ ~i \ 2 ~ / 1*cT • : '`i'~ ~ / \21 / ~ , . / ~ ' \ iQ1. 14.3 N 000, i 91.6/1 S.5 N r • i•T I ~v I • 7. 13 5 192.0 18 ~ L r~ ~21.„ \45 r2 ~ 9fl ~ , 92.4 18.0 N ~ ~9 0.8/17.9 N . 19 ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~IST• 191.9 18.3 N ~ NH 12 ~ ~ . . • v:1 &/~T 5~ r T 1 ~ 1 V 1 ~ ~ / ~ 18~ 184.8/17.3 N E . 190.8/17.9 N) 14H , , r . . ~ _ 191.6 17.3 N ~ EXIST. - ' ' " 192.4/ 191.17.6~i ~ : ~ i ••-f 180.6/16.9 N - 2. 0 17.1 N • . i ,v~ i ~ E-X~ 192.4 kf tv 3 \ i 189.6/16.7 N 191.6.SN 7,♦. ` (19 I I I 180.8 16.3 N 5/1 c._. ~ ...L ' _ + - - - • ' - - -----~7-----------------------• MN 14 . ~ n~i. . • ~ ' . • _ . • ~ - ' ' ~ ~ , , 'i~'.:•.t LiwiL Project No. 1736-01 Memo/Report No. 15 GIFFORD COIVSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnica/ Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 lp INSPECTION REPORT DMEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Monday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: September 9, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing , I returned on site to retest sites 70-73 and 79 along the water line - trench, (see 9/5 map for locations). I conducted 5 nuclear in place density test with the following results. Test Retest of No. Moisture % Compaction % 84 70/76 5.4 99 85 71 /77 4.4 102 86 72 4.0 98 87 73/81 3.0 97 See map 9/6 for gg 79 96 locations I notified the contractor that the areas around the water pipe boxes and sewer heads . needs to be compacted down with a hand tamper. The contractor said that they needed to lower the pipes down and would probably compact it then. I also asked about the progress on Augusta Lane and Sandusky River Lane. He replied that they were still working on the sewer line and it would be a couple of days. I made arrangements to return later in the week. By..... ~e~z~....!A...... . ~ Reviewed By: . Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) .s _ OCT 4-96 FRI 7'28 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS INC 5095342925 P.~01 - :;<i e , ~.`VMfrHV f IVN'`z t t5 t4`nnoistuw-uensity!~netaYionsr~~~ • h.,' •;~t ~ t~ . • l.%„~ ~`'~`^~i • w' . ~ ~ v• •t.• ~t ~.~w • . 'l'• ~R , S :i. ~s~'~ . 3' D' ~i ^t~4U'. 44' •~;~J' i' J,h.~ , t:7i~''.C. . ~ • • . r .~.b, :k ~tr ~ . ..r •~4'~.11(ii~.'~ir: ,t~13~ ~'••r r' , , , ~ • ~~!SI~,~ . ' . . . . . ~ ~ • i: • • , 1. ~ •.ti„~'~' .f;~~~. ~ ~ ~ ~a.an 6 • • ~ . . ~ . a d . ~ ~ . • • • ~o &Li~Q~r.~~~,~"~::::-~:~~~i~~/~4(;T.C~~I; . . . ~ ~ . l . '••.f~~'~~S'•O ~ I ,3, • t. 17~T~:'+ :.7',~~'f~ ~ i'• j ' '~+~`''V.1' ~ ~ t ~ ~ } `+'~~t~~i+' • ~ . r • ' • • . s~ ~ ~ ~ ~JOB'~NO. . MiixrMuM oRY. ~ ~ ' ' , • • OEN8ITY. PCF ~ ~ : DATE SAMPLE. NO. • . . , - . . OPT. W.C.. 9i , O Met6od A A 4 in. (102~mm) M OB # rtiold: soil materiafpassing a 4.75 mm (Na 4) sicve o AASHTO T-99 4 o ~ a ~ p Method B-A 6 in."(152 mm) AASHTO T-180 CC: USt Initials mold: soil maLcrial passitig a Ax 4.75 mm (Na 4) sicve . . . . 0 Metliod C-A 4 in. (102 mm) . . RWl& $Oll 1n8ICT11l p85SIQ$ 8 r-+-~•+-~• r..*. 19.0 mm (3G ia) sieve ' O Method D-A 6 in. (152 mm) ~ - ; : ' • anold: Soil matcrial passiog a ~ 19.0 mm (i/~ in) sicvc . ~ • - ~T~: ~ : , ' ' F4s _ , _ _ . i NOYE: TIiF fOIIOMIING T11M0 REIIs MUS'[ 59 FiL1.ED OUF. ~L~` t,i 4 ~l:.::'~~-' ~1 ~~,•r ~ SAMPIE DESCRIPTiONf ~ ~ ' ' ~ =~=`~r ~ ' •f a r tt `Ql1~' ~ n~ _,~='7^~.._ _ ~ ~ ~ _ • ~;,;,,t , ~ r F ~ • t / f • • ~ : ~ + ~ • ~ i.n.~i~.... . ,i.~Y~i . ' Y- ~~r• a~. .a~ , nj . • . ~..':i . . - - ' LOCATIOINL , • ioe . ~ . . . , ~ f~~~ {l~ • ~r ~y ~ • • . . • ~ - j .l *i..i , ~ ' . . REMARKS - " 4 = 4 ~ ~ . . , • . ~ • . , . ' . . . • • • ' • ' . ~+.rfn~• . . . ~ . . . . ~ . • ~ ' , ' p .ATta coN:crt _ naaNf . . , • ~ , . . :a, ; • . . ~ . ' . ~ . • ~ . . . • - ~ , . : • ' . ~ ' 4 V > . ~•.:~,~°':t' ' . • . . . i. r~.. ! .t ° .i ~.t • : ,~Y'•~•' ' ' . • , ~ l :..r : . t'.d:^j~~'~ ' . .r' . • . ~w ~ • ~ i . ' .~.d: ~ .1.~•. ~ . ~ w , ~ ` • ~ TEBT ~NO. . : ~ . . . ~ ' ~ 2 3 ' ~ • 4 6 a . • T 8 ' • ~ :~s~A~ ~ . . , . . . . . ~ . . . . ' ' ~ WET WT.*+ MOf.O' ~,~03 2~{;`yg~;. ,Z3;01 Post-ie Fax Note 7671 Dale /p_u.q6~ ay ~ es~ . • ~ ~ MOLD TARE WT. ~y/~' TO ; 9/'1 ~~CLtrvey From C . CoJOept Ca. WET WT. SOtI Photie 0 Phone ~i / _ CONSTANT (VOL) Fox # Fa"# uHiT wFT wT: 13y ~ 5♦ l3°~~ t . ~ . _ . , ; . . . PAN NO. ~ ~ WET WT.•7ARE ' DRY WT.• TARE 147" •0 ~~,p~ ' • . , • . 2 ~ye~~~~~ ~ . • . ~ . WT. 4F WATER Z~, , yI. 7 ~ TARE WT. . 10$,Q • ~~~t~~f . Z 1-~ F_ . ' . • ~ ' • ~ • . . . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~1 , ~ DRY WT: 8011-.-~ ~ ~'y?j G~~,~j/ J~7~ ' • ~ti...it . : . ~ ' ~ ~ ` . . : • .L ' 3•' • . _ .;~`.~:stt , . . . . ~ ' WATER CONTENT% ,°~O'i;~~'u ~ t.~ _ ~ ' . . • ' ~ ~ . . f~ ~ ' I , ~ . • • - :`,•r• f. . . ^ ~ _ ' - UNIT DRY WT. ~ . ~;Y%~-.~ . , ` i , . ; : • J~.. ~ ti, pt . e . :ti:l~-{~~`~.5~;~'.~' ~'r, . . ~ . 't^~}, ~ A. ! `i. . • ' . t . . ~ . .y.: ~ • ~ . . • • T ~.4•r t`~ • . ~ fl~l L . . . . r . ~ 1' . ~ . . ~ • • ,t•.~ ~ . . . . . ~ • . .I~. ~w~ . .1~ ' ' ~Z.~'~.G: . :,W. , ' ' ~ - PM .1 n ~t rs ~ ~&o7o . -Project No. E-1709-01 cc: ~ist tRiiiais Memo/Report No. 16-20 ✓ ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS' lNC. ' Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield _ PBg@ 1 Of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (5 4-3670 ■ II~ CTIO EPORT 13MEM4RANDUM 4 To: Inla~ Pac' i nineerin DaY. ' FridaY 9. 9 707 W. Yt YA e. Date: 9-27-96 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7`h Addition City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Liberty Lake Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson - WA SUBJECT : Compaction Testing - Upon request from Mr. Bruce Howard and Mr. John McKervey (Inland Pacific - Engineering), I made site visits at the following dates and times: Tuesday, 9-17-96, between 3:30 PM and 4:30 PM. Wednesday, 9-18-96, between 8:15 AM and 8:45 AM. Thursday, 9-19-96, between 9:00 AM and 10:30 AM between 12:30 PM and 1:00 PM between 3:00 PM and 4:00 PM Saturday, 9-21-96, between 1:00 PM and 3:00 PM Monday, 9-23-96, between 9:30 AM and 5:30 PM Tuesday, 9=24-96, between 7:00 AM and 2:00 PM between 5:30 PM and 6:00 PM Wednesday, 9-25-96, between 7:30 AM and 9:30 AM between 1 1:00 AM and 1:00 PM Thursday, 9-26-96, between 1:00 PM and 1:30 PM Friday, 9-27-96, between 8:30 AM and 9:30 AM between 3:00 PM and 4:00 PM During my site visits I tested the compaction of the road subgrade. All of the final compaction tests exceeded the minimum specified compaction of 95%. Areas which had initial compaction tests below the specified compaction were re-compacted until the minimum specified compaction was achieved. Compaction tests were based on a 139.5 PCF inaximum density with exception to compaction tests #144 and #146, which were based on a 131.0 PCF inaximum density. The 139.5 modified proctor represents on-site native, brown, slightly silty, very sandy, GRAVEL. The 131.0 modified proctor represents brown, slightly silty, gravely, SAND, originating from base course material below existing roads. - Page 2 of 4 Memo #16-#20 E 170q-01 Compaction test results are as follows: Date Test # Retest of # % ComPaction 9-17 89 95% 9-17 90 95% 9-17 91 96% 9-18 92 95% 9-18 93 95% - 9-18 94 95% 9-18 95 97% ' 9-18 96 96% 9-18 97 - 97% 9-18 98 95% 9-18 99 95% 9-18 100 9 2 % 9-18 101 89% 9-18 102 93% ) 9-18 103 92% 9-21 110 100 93% - ' 9-21 111 96% 9-21 112 101, 102, 103 98% 9-21 113 98% 9-21 114 94% 9-21 115 96% 9-21 116 95% 9-21 117 97 % . 9-21 118 93% 9-23 119 100, 110 95% 9-23 120 113 95% 9-23 121 118 97 % 9-24 135 97% 9-24 136 90% -9-24 137 136 94% 9-24 " 138 136,137 96% 9-24 139 98 % 9-24 140 97 % 9-24 141 97% 9-24 142 94% ~ 9-24 143 142 96% " • ' ` ~ j~ Page 3 of 4 Memo #16420 E 17 oq -01 Date Test # Retest of # % Compaction 9-24 144 97% 9-24 145 95% 9-24 146 98% 9-25 147 96% 9-25 148 91 % 9-25 149 91 % 9-25 150 149 95% 9-26 151 96% 9-26 152 148 98% 9-27 153 90% 9-27 154 153 93% 9-27 155 153, 154 94% - 9-27 156 153, 154, 155 95% 9-27 157 94% 9-27 158 157 97% 9-27 159 95% 9-27 160 96% Compaction tests # 104-# 109 and tests # 122-# 134, representing curb basecourse, is documented in memos #19, and #21. Please refer to the following page for test locations. ~ , BY , iewed By Copies to: Pacific perties ( . oug Birch) L 1~ ; F '~pt~ -01 - ~ 16 , ~ ~ ~ 5 ~19 ` . 6 / 2 2'~1 v , ~''~y v j ~ ^ r ' . ► - r'~ti ^ 'Y ~ ~ .,i ' , ~ ~,J ~ ! ~ i . ✓ .~t' ~ ~ '1 ► - ` - ~ " ~ X~51 • t 2 j • . . . . ~ ' / ~ ' ~ ti ~ ~ • ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ' _ 1000' ~j .-Ol 't• ~ - ~ ~ ~ , N 1 , g 2 .2120.4 ~ ~ • ~ ~ , ~ ~2 / 1 ~ / ' .~j ~ f j 4 ~ Qnl ~ .C ~ ` ~ ~ ..r• ` ~ 2 (~f,l ~ 19 ti ~ , _ • ~ ~ ~ •t'y 1 .7~ ~ ' • ~ • ` ~ • ~ ~ ~ r~ - ~0,~ ~ :7 ` : . ~ / ~ _1 ' , , • ~ ` l ~ , ol' ~i . . ~ • / i~`~~~ ~ . h ~ ~ ~ K ~ 0' y ' ~ ~ 1 A. 1Q.3 9 1 1 192.0 ~ r~ ;V . ~ 5.0 92•4 ~ , ! ,r~ • 5 - tS-;y~ ~ / _ 0001' 192= .h tt~ ` ♦r i:. -IV y``~ ~ ~ ~ 17 •s ~ \ ~ ` • - 0.8~ = ~ ' ~ ~~15~• ` . ~ £ f I ~ ,g117 •g ~ _ . , 18q_a7•3 1 ' 19 }'6 1-7 3 192.4 ~ 1 6•4 S ~ 92 ' 17•1 Kj ~ ~g~,1 17•6 x ~.6~ ~.0 ~ : g. ~17 192 : = ►i . . . 3 ~ ~ . , -A , ~K • ~ , , _ ,1 5 N ~91.5/ig• g9.5/16•7 ~ ~ ~ - ; 369 i - = - . • ~ ~,QK GA a,y~ . . . 't rQSt µK , 4 b Gr'~ T~ ~ t,~~'0~r o SS o~ G f~~ S%b X • F r1 n~ GCI r . ` Job No. E 1736-01 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ Memo/Re ort No. 19 Geotechnical Engineers p E.2020 Springfield _ ~c , Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3~7.0 f~~ w Page 1 of 1 w )5slNSPECTION REP Q8TI5 ~g~6 U ~ MEMORANDUM Day: Friday Date: September 20, 1996 s To: Inland Pacific Engineering Project: Riverwalk 7th Addition 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 City/County Permit No.: Spokane, Washington 99204 Project Address: Mission Ave. & Holiday Attn: Mr. Jerry Pererson Lane, Spokane, WA SUBJECT :Compaction Testing . . On site 9:45 a.m at Contractor's request (Mr. Steve Kobzeff with Gary and Sons Construstion) to test in-place density of crushed concrete base course. The Contractor . had placed and compacted approximately 2 to 8inches of this material for curb support along both sides of.Baldwin Lane and both sides of Salmon River Lane north of Baldwin Lane. Six density tests were made at the approximate locations, shown on the attached site ~ plan. In-place moisture was checked in the field, however reported density values are those obtained directly from the nucular densometer. Values ranged from 93 to 100 percent and averaged 97 percent of a Modified Proctor maximum dry density of 123 pcf. ~ Off site 12 p.m. s . '00"O"'a ..........................6_*0 By.. Reviewed By. Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) ' . ' / _ ~ EX 0'/ Z } ~ • N a ~ A 192.4 20 - ,~~1' S ~ 21. 3 i ~ 4 ~ ~~ti 5., N ✓ 9 ~ •6 p.. 10, ~ ~X~ST 7 3 . ~ zx~ ti ~ = 2 - • • , . .y ~ ~ ~ ~ y . 3 i ~ y ~ 0. 4 N~ ~ c • ' ~ 1 (21 192.2I2 ~i~ 2~ . • ` , ` ► 2 1 q 1.6/1 ~ I r~ ` ~ ' ~ 1 ♦ f . . ' ~ / ..r" ' ~ p~ S~" ~ .i ; f ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 . ' • ~ ► g . ~ ~~-a . ~ , . . ~ ~ A ~•7~ 1 .7 ~l ~ ~ t r i / ~ "'ti... / 2 > > a S N . ' ~ /~E3 ` ` f 19 ti .6 . ~ h//~ ( pl ~ ~ ~ 191 • ~ 9 ' 3 ~ 18 .0 . ~ 2 ~ ~ . .0 ~,V• 92•4 ~ a'~ N / 000 ' • 5 ti ~ ~2ti 192•. rt~ .~,•y~~ ~ % .0, 117.9 N 90.8 5'3 , 190.8/i7.9~ ~ : ~ ~ , ~9 ,g 17 •3 µ ` ~ 1 fi 17 .3 µ 92 4 ~ 5 - - • " , - . . 5 = - ,5 18.9 92,0/17 ,1 .117 Agp.6 1 ~ r A91 - - ~ ~ VI 4' 192 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ - . ~ ~q1• 5 .ti. t . : ~ ` ~ ~ -,_"r ~ X~~,; ` • g 18.3 ~ - •~~T 6 ~ N ~ 90 $9.6 } • - ~ - ~ - r 1? ~t19 T4 1 , / - ~ _ . • " 1 ~tr~ gH , 4 _ - • ' . . S~'%i" ~ r / . ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ e-li r\ f , . Project No. E-1709-01 Memo/Report No. 21 C") GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 2 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 N INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Monday 707 W. 7th Ave. Date: 9-23-96 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addition City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Atfin: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Ln. SUBJECT : Curb Basecourse Compaction Tests Upon the request of Mr. John McKervey (Inland Pacific Engineering), I made a site visit on Monday, 9-23-96, between 9:30 AM and 5:30 PM. During my site visit I took compaction tesfis representing the curb basecourse. , ~ The basecourse material used was 5/8- crushed concrete. I took a total of 12 compaction tests which all exceeded the minimum specified compaction of 95%, based on a 123 PCF inaximum density. The maximum density was obtained from a modified proctor of basecourse material sampled at STA 28 + 00, left curb. Test results are as follows: Test # % Compaction 122 99% 123 96% 124 99% 125 100% 126 97 % 127 95% 128 96% 129 100% 130 96% 131 100% ' 132 97 % 133 98% . ~ 134 9 ° By Reviewed By , /V ~ ~ Copies to: Pa~i~ic Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) ^Y ~ , 1 M ~ ` 000of ~ x 1 ~1/~ ~ ✓ ~ ~ 1 , ~ M ~ . , 6~ ^ /.t r ~ ~ • , ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ • . ~ 192 .2 2t ' ( / / ~ . ~ / i f~~' ~ ~ ~ , t~ ~ 2 ~ l 2 6 1~•5 ~ 19 ~ • , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 , / / ' ~ / ~ • / 1 ~y,3 / ~i - ro / qo? ~ ~ ♦ , '4~" ~ ~ ~ ~8.5 IV i l%Id X ~ ~ 1~~•6 , ~ ~ f ~9 •3 ~ ~2~ / . ~ ~ • g~,,0 ~ ~s L 92, , ; . •~y' ' ' ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ti • ` ~ op . ~ 2 .000, . ~ r • 00, ` •J , ~rt t~ 1 / ~ r . ~ ~ ~ Project No. E-1709-01 Memo/Report No. 22B ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Ceotechnica/ Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ti INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Tuesday 707 W. 7th Ave. Date: 9-24-96 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addition City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Ln. SUBJECT : Concrete Tests (Curb) " Upon the request of Mr. John McKervey (Inland Pacific Engineering), I made a site visit on Tuesday, 9-24-96. The weather was clear and 57 degrees. During my site visit concrete was placed into curbs along Baldwin Ln. and the south entrance of Salmon River Ln. Tests were taken of the mix #31 14, 5.5 SK, 3000 PSI concrete placed into the described locations. I took a total of one set of four, compressive strength, test cylinders representing the left curb of Salmon River Ln., at STA 28 + 50. Test results are as follows: Slump = 0.5 in Air=3.5°/a Concrete Temp = 61 deg. / BY ' eviewed By /6//r ' Copies to: Pa fi Properties r. Doug Birch) , , - y. . Project No. E-1709-01 Memo/Report No. 22 / ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 19 INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Monday 707 W. 7t" Ave. Date: 9-30-96 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addition City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Ln. SUBJECT : Basecourse Compaction Tests , Upon the request of Mr. John McKervey (Inland Pacific Engineering), I made a site visit on Monday, 9-30-96, between 12:00 PM and 2:30 PM. The purpose was to test the ~ compaction of the roadway, 5/8 - basecourse. During my site visit I took a total of 11 compaction tests which all exceeded the minimum specified compaction Of 95 based on a 137.3 PCF inaximum density. Test results and locations are as follows: Test # % Comoaction Location 161 95% STA 28 + 25 Salmon R., 5 ft. L of CL 162 96% STA. 26 + 50 Salmon R., 5 ft. R of CL 163 100% STA 24 + 52 Salmon R., 2. ft. R of CL 164 97 % STA 22 + 50 Salmon R., 10 ft. L of CL 165 98% STA 20 + 50 Salmon R., 8 ft. L of CL 166 97% STA 19 + 60 Salmon R., 3 ft. L of CL 167 96% STA 16 + 25 Holiday, 4 ft. L of CL 168 97% STA 14+25 Holiday, CL 169 98% STA 12 + 50 Holiday, 11 ft. L of CL 170 95 % STA 1 1+ 25 Holiday, 5 ft. R. of CL 171 98% STA 41 +00 Baldwin, CL 172 95% STA 43+00 Baldwin, CL - C . ~ By _ Reviewed By. Copies to: P' ic Properties r. Doug Birch) . . , . , „ " , ' PM JOB 4 _ M $ ~ ~l''f17J~~ i i CC: Lis , t tnitiats Project No. 1736-01 Memo/Report No. 23/24 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers ~ - E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 P4 1NSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Tuesday & Wednesday 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Date: October 1& 2, 1996 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addn. City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Lane SUBJECT : Compaction Testing , Three site visits were made between Monday 10/1 and Tuesday 10/2 at the request of John McKervey of Inland Pacific' Engineering. John McKervey was also on site for these visits. The purpose of the visits was to test sub-base along Mission and to test base - course from Mission to McMillan and Holiday to Harmony. 8 Nine nuclear in-place density tests were conducted on -the sub-base along Mi-ssion from Holiday to Harmony, -(see map 10/1 for locations). Compaction varied from 86% to 100% with an average compaction of 93% based on a 130 pcf m,odified proctor. Three areas tested below 95%, John McKervey and the contractor for Garry and Sons were notified and the material was re-compacted. No additional work was approved until 95°l0 compaction was achieved. Moisture varied from 3.6% to 9.1 % with an average moisture of 6.7%. Twelve nuclear in-place density tests were conducted on the base course for areas between Mission, McMillan, Holiday and Harmony, (see map 10/1 for locations). Compaction varied from 93°!o to 100% with an average compaction of 97% based on a 136 pcf modified proctor. Moisture varied from 3.7% to 6% with an average moisture of 4.8%. Sections testing under 95% were re-compacted and re-tested. The intersection at Mission and Harmony was re-excavated to correct a pipe problem and was not ready to be tested. I made arrangements with John McKervey to have someone return tomorrow to test the areas that were not ready. ~ . . 1 By..~~,.~o~..!~ .:..~~.~►r.~~r.:.i... C~..l Reviewed By: Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) . -r • r I Project No. E-1709-01 / f Memo/Report No. 25 ~ GIFFORD COIVSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 E INSPECTION REPORT EIMEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering Day: Thursday 707 W. 7`h Ave. Date: 10-3-96 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addition City/County Permit No.: Project Address: Mission Ave. and Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Holiday Ln. SUBJECT : Concrete Tests (Curb) - Upon the request of Mr. John McKervey (Inland Pacific Engineering), I made a site visit on Thursday, 10-3-96, between 3:00 PM and 4:00 PM. The purpose was to test the ~ subgrade located at the NE shoulder of Mission and Harmony LN., and to test the basecourse along tract C(Extension along the north side of Mission). The subgrade compaction test, at the NE shoulder of Mission and Harmony, resulted in 96% compaction based on a 131 PCF modified proctor. The compacted material of the described test location is representative of the basecourse material below the existing roadways. I took a total of three compaction tests of the basecf,°urse material along tract C which exceeded the minimum specified compaction of 950/o, based on a 137 PCF modified proctor. Tesrt results are as follows: Location % Compaction STA 22 + 50 100% STA 24 + 5 5 9 9% STA 26 + 60 95% . BY eviewed BY czd~'~ < Copies to: Pacific o erties (Mr. oug Birch) ~ OCT-17-96 THU 9:47 G7 ORD COt•~SULTAh-ITS*INC. 5095342925 P.02 • ^ ~ ~ect No. . ~ - . , ~ E-1736-01 MemoJReport No. 26 G(FFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ Ceotechnica! Engineers E.2020 Sprinptield Page 1 OF 2 Spoka7 WA 99202 (509) 534•3670 O'INSPECTION REPORI' ❑ MEMORANDUM To: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING DaY: SEE REPORT 707 W. 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200 Date: SPOKANE, WASHiNGTON 99204 Project: RIVERWALK 7TH ADDiTION CitylCounty Permit No.: Praject Address: Attn: MR. JERRY PETERSON SUB.IECT : ASPH.ALT CONCRETE PAVING THE FOLLOWING REPORT iS A SUMMARY OF ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING INSPEC- TION AND TESTING-PR4VIDED BY GIFFOP.D COPJSULTANTS,,INC. AT THE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION PROJECT:. THIS WORK WAS ACCOMPLISHED ON OCTOBER 7 AND 8, 1996. GCI INSPECTION PERFORMED DENSITY TESTING BY NUCLEAR GAUGE; AND JOHN MCKERVEY OF ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING MONITORED ACP TEMPERATURES AND THiCKNESS. ~ DENSITY TESTS ON OCTOBER 7 ME'I THE PROJECT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT OF 9296, USING A RICE VALUE OF 154.7 PCF(PROVIDED BY PETROLEUM SCIENCES, INC., FROM A SAMPLE TAKEN AT THE START OF WORK THIS DATE). THE MAJORITY OF DENSITY.TESTS ON OCTOBER 8 FAILED TO ME£T THE 92% MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, USING A RICE VALUE OF 156.3 PCF(ALSO PROVIDED BY PETROLEUM SCIENCES, INC., FROM A SAMPLE TAKEN AT THE START OF WORK THIS DATE). TEST RESULTS RANGED FROM APPROXIMATELY 889G TO 91%. NUCLEAR DENSITY TESTS BY INLAND ASPHALT QUALITY CONTROL, ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF AUGUSTA LANE, RESULTED IN SIMILAR READINGS. PLEASE SEE PAGE 2 FOR GCI INSPECTION TEST LOCATIONS AND RES(3LTS. ~ P v• ~ UCT-17-96 THU 9'48 GIFFORD CONSULTAMTS INC. 5095342925 P.03 - UIFFUKu Lulvb ui.-1 I tvk;. • . Geotechnlcal Engineers • :~0• E-1736-01 E.2020 Springlield MemolReport No. 26 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 _ Page 2 oF 2 a o . LOCATIdH RESULTS BAI,DWTN LANE EAST END, CUL-DE-SAC (10/07/96) NORTH SECTION 92.6% SOUTH SEC'I'ION 92.4% + 200' 92.67o + 900' 92.5% + 500' 92.2/ SALMON RIVER LANE NORTH FIVD 91.8% (10/07/96) + 200' , 92.8% + 400' 92.0% + 600' 92.79b + 800' 93.09b + 950' 92.49b HOLIDAY LANE NORTH Etr'D . 93.0% (10/07/96) + 200' 91.79b + 400' 94.2% + 600' 93.896 POTOMAC RIVER LANE NORTH END . 92.1% (10/07/96) + zoo' 93.5% + 900' , 92.6% (10/08/96) + 400' 89.8% - + 550' - ' 91.296 RIO GRANDE LANE SOUTH END, CUL-DE-SAC 89.1% (10/08/96) + 200' 88.79b + 300' 89.9% MCMILLAN LANE EAST END 89.6% (10/08/96) + 200' 89.9ib + 400' 88.8~ +600' . 90.296 AUGUSTA LANE EAST END► CUL-DE-SAC 90.8% (10/08/96) + 100' . 92.296 + 200' 90.396 SAIVDUSKY LANE EAST END, CUL-DE-SAC 89.29b (10/08/96) + 100' 91.0% -s- 200, 91 .09G , r- BY REVIEWED BY PG. COPIES T0: PACIFIC 0 ERTIES(MR. DOUG BIRCH) OCT-15-96 -TUE 8:49 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS INC. 5095342925 P.01 ~ ^ ' vvv ~tv. ~ / PM .IOB 10-1 C: List Initials . ~ GiFFORD CONSULTANTS, lNC. . • 2020 E.Springfieid Ave, Spokane, WA 99202 0 Tetephone: (509) 534•3670 Fax (509) 534-2925 ~ FACSIMILE COVER SHEET ~ 7"iansmitta! Date I4 6, %'b PLEasE Fax ro: Firm c fAx nro. Name FROM: G/FFORD CONSUL TANTS, INC. Name C Yqr ~Total No. of pages transmitted, including cover sheet:-,Z NO TES: ~ . ,r,, . ~v v~ ~•'r~ ulrr VKLJ I.VfYJV4 1 H(V I J 1Nli. OU7Z)642925 P. 02 ' ' . . PE tOLEUt1 SC I ENCgS 48924d 1 P. 01 Peboteum Sden~ Ina ~ A9pllalt xcchnotogy • AsFhalt Eanulsivns 9 Polymer Asphalt • Rheolo6Y 4817 N. Preya St., 03 ~ P.O. Box 6304 • Spokane, W,A, 99207 (504) 989-2758 • Fa,x (504) 489•2401 Qifford Consuita+lts 2020 E. Sprin9fietd Spokano, WA 99202 octohor 70 1996 PrOjeGt #F3161-A, C 6 Q Attn : Cra i g Knapp/Gr ent Currmi ng-s Ra: Spokane County Insp6ctior► Testing. The following cores were received as dated below during tho week of 10-7 to 10-11-96. The tests required were % asphalt (by axtract i on gradet i on and R i ce dens i ty (ASTM D 2041). Riverwalk Riverwelk aardons Tth Add. 7tih Add. 2nd add. WsDOz J Q ~ 1..--91 io- (L• jO ~ a -n - % AS phalt , on mix 5.21 4.67 5.31 Rice pensity 154.7 156.3 154.1 ~ ar ad at i on , pass i ng 3/4" • 100.0 100,0 140.0 100 1/2 98.6 97.0 ~ 9T.2 90-100 3/8 8T.3 79.1 88.8 754-90 1/4 71.2 58.3 72.9 55-75 #10 39.8 38.4 31.6 30-42 40 15.7 12.0 . 10.9 * 11-24 200 7.2 * 5.5 5.2 3.0-7.0 ~ Dafi a markod with an asterisk are out of range but close enough to be csus ed by v ari at ions due to samp 1 i ng and test i ng . t f f urther data is heeded we su9gest it be based on an extracted aggregato gradQtion obtained from a minimum of three 4" diemeter f ield coros. Respsctf u 1 1 y submi tted, . Kcnt Nendorson. VP Technicsl ServiCes h • OCT-17-96 THU 9:46 GIFFORD CONSULTANTS INC. 5095342925 P.01 ~ r--.~ vvv ~~v. yriv7 •v~ PM Jc3B -It .S: .~~i~' r ~ 9lv s~v • . ~ . • CC: List Initiai: y~ . ~ . .:tILwAa~ • `ry.r Rti 1 ~ l GfFFORD CONSULYANTS, 1NC. I O 2020 E.Springfieid Ave, Spokane, WA 99202 O Tetephone: (509) 534-3670 Fax (509) 534-2925 ~FA csINrIc E c o vER sHFEr~ . Transmittal Date -PLEASE FAX TO: Fr'rm ..L. ( Ec. . FAX No. Name ~''/'y. ~ ~ . ~ FROM: GIFFORD CONSUL TANTS, INC. . Name V - Total No. of pages transmitted, inc/udr'ng cover sheet: 7 qt NO TES: 1 x z` 7- ' ,6 ~ a ~ C -~-r Q _ - C~ f • / ~-m ~a'`~ Ct~ ~ ~ ~ `fjr~ _ ~'y~ " • ~ P M . ! O a ff ' ' :1 Sr J? 64 ~loo~v -l ~ y pGT 2 9 1996 CC: LiSt Initials ; G/FFORD CONSUL TANTS, /NC.I, P. project ieference no. 17 - Geotechnica/ Engineers ; 2020 E. Springfield A ve., Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 FAX (509) 534-2925 LETTER OF TRANS1171TTAL date: October 25, 1996 to: /n/and Pacific Engineering 707 W. 7th A venue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 attendom-Mr. Peterson We are sending the fol% wing items: ✓ a ttached . under separa te co ver no./copies 2 Compressi ve Streng th Tes t Rep ort, 912419 6- 10/5/9 6 Ri.verwalk 7th Addition these are transmitted: _as requested _ for your use ✓ for your retention _ for review _with corrections _for action specified . please return b y: remarks: b y: ~1.,.p4.,. 1 4- A.4 .Q-l►~ copies to: Central Pre-Mix; Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) . • l~ ~')/FFORD CONSUL TANTS, :~~C. ~ , . GEOTECHN/CAL ENGINEERS E. 2020 Spring/ield Ave. Spokene, WA 99202 f5091534-3670 SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT PROJECT: Riverwalk 7th Addition BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-01 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Garry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: SUBCONTRACTOR: - CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Clear DATE OF REPORT: 9-24-96 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 57° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) MATERIAL SAMPLED: 's Concrete DATE SAMPLED: : 9-24-96 . .................................................................s.......................................................... SAMPLED BY: : C. Knapp TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: ; 11 .................................................................1. .f.................. LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: : Curbs c Salmon River Ln. YDS.3, BATCH / CUMULATIVE: : 11 ~ 11 . .................................................................a.......................................................... SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: : Sta. 28+50, left DELIVERY TICKET NO.: : 68867 SPECIMEN TYPE: : 6" x 12" cylinder BATCH TIME / END TIME / AGE 20 • - - . • :r:+o-: ~::~::•::t<:~:::•.ti•.ti•:::. . •.Y•:. t•::;~::'t"t::: ~S:t~:::~:~: ' •:r~... • ::•:~eoo-:•.t............ ..k~ .r.......~ ALLOWABLE . 4 : : . ~ r: : : . ..............J..1::...:?~..~•:}:•:~:: hL.. . . . SUPPLIER: ~ Central Premix WATER BEFORE/AFTER SLUMP: : 0 : 5. . MIX NO.: : 3114 SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: ~ Truck discharge , • SACK CONTENT: 5.5 FIELD TESTS : SPEC. : ACTUAL . TYPE CEMENT: II SLUMP, in. (ASTM C 143): fl.s. 0.5 . MAX. AGG. SIZE: 314" CONC. TEMP., °F (ASTM C 1064): 55-90 61 ° - DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: : 3000 AIR CONTENT, %(ASTM C 231): ~ n.s. : 3.5 . ADMIXTURES ADDED AT PLANT: : AEA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (ASTM C 138): : n.s. : n.t. . ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: - W/C RATIO: : n.s. : n.t. Abbreviations: AEA=Air Entraining Admixture WRA=Water Reducer HRWR=High Range Water Reducer (Superplasticizer) FR=Fber Reinforcement CA=Calcium Chloride Acczlerator NCA=Non-Chloride Accelerator FA=FIy Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=not recorded n.ti=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) TOTAL SPECIMEN DATE DATE AGE, TESTED ~ LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LAB N0. FIELD N0. RECEIVED TESTED DAYS BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI 96-0829 17360924A 9-25 10-1 7 JM 111,960 28.50 3,930 96-0830 B 10-22 28 JM 140,520 " 4,930 .........................i. .......................J. ....................1. .t. ...................t. .......................J. .1. 96-0831 C 10-22 28 JM 133,300 " 4,680 . 96-0832 D - Hold . t . REQUIRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: unk. - 0 MEETS SPECIFICATION ACTUAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,805 O FAILS SPECIFICATION Notes: Technician Signature . IYV Y- zJ- 70 1 VG 1`T . t~ .a 1 r r VRL/ 4..VIY.?VL 1!'71• 1:J 11\.r JCJ 7JJ'TG 7GJ r• CI 1 P~fivleum Sciences, ine ~ Asphalt Technology o Asphalt Emulaions • Potylner Asphalt • Rheology . 4817 N. Freya St., #3 • P.O. Dox 6304 • Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 489-1758 9 Fax (509) 489-2401 ~ °t ► I Post-ir Fax Note 7671 oate 46 pages GiFford Consultants Fram Cr iG H 2020 E. Spr i ngf i e 1 d T~ JQ''ey ~~er~' ~ ,d Co Spokane, WA 99202 CO~~~ ~ ~ Pt►one # 14 Phone 4 _ 36 70 October 31, 1996 Fax # Fac: Project #3168 • Attn: Craig Knapp/Grant Cummin9s "PM JoB # Re: SPokane County Inspection Testing. : '.ist initials . : P R i verwa 1 k E- - . 7th Add. WSDOT ` - s omp 10 t Q 1R-- - 99 ._.12.2rc _ a _ % Asphatt, on mix 5.44 o~ Rice Density 154.9 ' - • Graciat i on, - - % passing . 3/4 " 100.0 100 1/2 94.4 90-100 3/8 82.5 75-90 1/4 67.4 55-75 #10 37.3 30-42 40 14.3 1/-24 200 6.6 3.0-7.4 ' Respectfully submitted', t...P~~~ . Kent Nenderson, VP Technical Services ~ - RECEIVED NOV Q41996 , • 6lTlrORO CONBULtANT8. iNC. OPOKANE - Yi i • ' YJ' l u.v. ~ / _1IJL I~ GIFFORD CONSUL TANTS, /NC. project reference no. 1736-0 1 Geo technical Engineers 2020 E. Springfield Ave., Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 FAX (509) 534-2925 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL } : PM ' JOB ~ t date: November 7, 1996 Cr: List initiais to: /n/and Pacific Engineering ~P 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 . Spokane, WA 99204 attention: n 0 We are sending the fol% wing items: ✓ a ttached under separa te co ver no./copies ~ Compressive Strength Test Report, 1015196 Riverwa/k 7th Addition , these are transmitted: as requested _ for your use ✓ for your retention for review with corrections _for action specified please re turn b y: remarks: b y; Tp-~. va _ r„ ~ copies to: Central Pre-Mix, Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) . , / w."'~ A~ IG/FFORD CONSUL TAN7 ; /NC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS E. 2020 Springreld Ave. Spokane, wA 99202 l5091 534-3670 ~ SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT , PROJECT: Riverwalk 7th Addition BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-01 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: PROJECT ADDRESS: E. Mission Ave. SUBCONTRACTOR: - CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: DATE OF REPORT: 10-5-96 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: ° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) MATERIAL SAMPLED: : Concrete DATE SAMPLED: : 10-5-96 . SAMPLED BY .R. Schuitr ..TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR:..... 60 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: : Curbs - Mission Ave. YDS.3, BATCH / CUMULATIVE: : 10 : 40 SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: : West of Holiday Lane DELIVERY TICKET NO.: : 69924 : c SPECIMEN TYPE: : 6" x 12" cylinder BATCH TIME / END TIME / AGE 50 ~ ..:.:r..:.~:: . . . ~ ~ - . ~ .....v.ti~..:.:.:--~ . :;::r;•::.:::.>~.:• ...r . '•r"'-4.~•5:-:~ . WATER: n.r. ALLOWABLE . : : . . : :''r':•t:: . ::::.::..1 V.!!~''i tl~.'::. r r . • . . ~ ' • :'.l'.'~'}L:'::•~ . . . . 1. . • f ' i . •'1.'.':::.'.' . :.~f. . :•.Yr.L.• .ti1': _ J . . . • • . ~ SUPPLIER: : Central Premix WATER BEFORE/AFTER SLUMP: : 0 : 0 MIX NO.: : 3112 SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: : Truck discharge . . . SACK CONTENT: : 5.75 FIELD TESTS c SPEC. : ACTUAL . .............................................................i..................................... TYPE CEMENT: II SLUMP, in. IASTM C 143): I'T18X. 4 0.75 , : ~ MAX: AGG: SIZE 314" .CONC: TEMP::.~F (ASTM C1osa):.......55: 55-90 ::56- ~ DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: 3000 AIR CONTENT, %(ASTM C 231): : 5.3 . ADMIXTURES ADDED AT PLANT: : AEA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (ASTM C 138I: : n.r. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: W/C RATIO: : n.r. Abbrevlatlons: AEA=Air Entraining Admixture WRA=Water Reducer HRWR=Nigh Range Water Reducer (Superplasticizer) FR=Fiber Reinforcement CA=Calcium Chloride Accelerator NCA=Non-Chloride Aocelerator FA=FIy Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=not recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) TOTAL SPECIMEN - DATE DATE AGE, TESTED : LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LAB NO. FIELD NO. RECEIVED TESTED • DAYS BY LBS. SQ. (N. PSI 96-0864 17361005A 10-8 10-12 7 DT 130-,040 28.50 4,560 96-0865 B " 11-2 28 137,540 28.50 4,830 . 96-0866 C 11-2 28 138,920 28.50 4,870 . 96-0867 D " - Hold . . REQUIRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3,000 M MEETS SPECIFICATION ~ ACTUAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,850 O FAILS SPECIFICATION ~ Notes: Cylinders made by the contractor. Sampling was not observed by GCI. Technician Signature . ~ PETOLEUM SCIENCES 4592401 P.01 . P etiva vsosrn Sdences, Inc Asphalf Technolagy • AspltsIt Emulsions • Paiymer Asphalt • Rheolvgy ~ 9817 N. Freya St., M3 • P.O. Box 6304 • Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 489-1758 • Fax (509) 489-2401 ~ PfVi JOA # ; 4 - FAX t'.OV@1' Sh86t List'InitiBfs D at e : A t t rr :%rwC.e Y-04~t't - From: Ye4,< Peges: 6'p 41(&tj . Message: &"'r ~ 5D~s . ` ~ ~ ~ c~Y CAJ a AC7. wv . < 46-,olv~ vI•i crvl.t P ~ ►t37'L4l~ 1 1-' .!~L . • « • i i ~ Sciences, ~mt Inc Aspbalt Z'echnology • Asphalt E{nulaions • I'olymcr A,ephAlt • Rheology 4817 N. Freya St., #3 - P.O. Box 6304 • Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 489-1758 • Fax (509) 489-2401 Garry & Sons, Inc. 24 N. Sycamore Spokane, WA 99202 , Novomber 7, 1996 Project #3170 Attn: Dave Goss Rv: Core compaction values from Riverwalk Tth Addition. , 1'tie cores 1 isted below were taken 1 1--6--96 by our f irm and testeci f or bu 1 k spec i fi i c grav i ty . Th i s va 1 tie i s changed to pef us i ng 62.4 as the convers i on f acto:r . New max imum spec i f i c grav ity tests were rAun ori two cores and found to bo 155.4 pcf which fai 15 uetween data r•aportod ear•lier by our lab based on two separate days of praduct i on . We f ee i th i s new number, , based on the actua 1 coros,is t;he best one to use tn ana 1 yz ing tho A6 compact ion of the cores. ~-cj~r~ ~Q2Mpact i on e i sht Atigust-a, East end 91.4 • 2 7/16 Auyusta +100 92 . 7 1 3/8 Augusi:a +200 90.6 2 3/8 Saridusky, East ehd 8912 2 1/2 SArtdusky +100 93.1 2 1/4 Sandusky +200 90.8 1 5/8 McMillan, Eest end 91•4 2 1/8 McMillan +200 91.6 2 1/2 McM i 1 i ati +400 92.3 2 1/8 McMillan +600 88.4 2 1/4 Rio Orande, 5outh End 92.6 27/8 Rio Grande +200 88.4 1 3/8 itio Grando +300 88•4 2 Poi.omac +400 . 92.0 2 1/4 Potomac +500 93•7 Z 1/2 Avvra9e- 91.1 2 • 117 0 Respectfu 1 1 y submitted, . ~ Q"q-. ~-R"'L _ Karit lienderson, VP 7echnica l Serv i ces , ' fef i t ~S'.!~Y - ~ Project No. E-1736-01 Memo/Report No. 27 REV~~ ~ eLi ° GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ Geotechnical Engineers E.2020 pringfield NOV 2 2 1996 Page 1 OF 3 Spoka , WA 99202 (509) 534•3670 1.P.E. 12~ INSPECTION REPORT D MEMORANDUM To: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING Day: SEE REPORT 707 W. 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200 Date: SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 Project: RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION CitylCounty Permit No.: Project Address: • ~ `l (°(rj~l~ Attn: . MR. JERRY PETERSON r7 1 ~ SUBJECT : CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION AND TESTING • ; . _ . , THE FOLLOtaING REPORT IS A SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION_A~D-"' i TESTING PROVIDED BY GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC., AT THE RIVERWALK 7TH ADDITION PROJECT: OCTOBER 51 1996 ~ TRAVELED TO PROJECT SITE THIS DATE TO SAMPLE AND TEST CONCRETE BEING PLACED FOR'CURB AT THE NORTH LANE OF MISSION AVENUE. CONCRETE WAS DELIVERED WITH A VERY LOW SLUMP, AND PLACED, FORMED AND VIBRAT- .ED MECHANICALLY. . . CAST ONE SET OF FOUR TEST*SAMPLES FROM 5.75 SK., 3/4" AGGREGATE, AIR-ENTRAINED MIX N0. 3112 CONCRETE, REPRESENTING A TOTAL OF 70 CUBIC YARDS DELIVERED. MEASURED SLUMP WAS 0.75 INCH, ENTRAINED-AIR CONTENT 5.3%. TEST SAMPLE WAS TAKEN FROM CONCRETE BEING PLACED AT THE CURB AREA IMMEDIATELY WEST OF HOLIDAY LANE. OCTOBER 11, 1996 TRAVELED TO PROJECT SITE THIS DATE TO TEST COMPACTION,•BY NUCLEAR GAUGE, OF 5/8" MINUS GRAVEL BASE COURSE AT THE NORTH LANE OF MISSION AVENUE. GCI DENSITY TESTING jaAS IN PROGRESS WHEN IT WAS NOTED, BY OTHERS, THAT THE ELEVATION OF THE GRAVEL BASE COURSE WAS INCORRECT, AND WORK WAS TERMINATED, - TESTING OF GRAVEL BASE COURSE WAS SCHEDULED FOR 10:00 A.M. THIS DATE; COMPACTION W0RK WAS NOT COMPLETE UNTIL 12 : 30 P. M. . - GIFFORD CONSULT _ TS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers '~Job No. E-1736-01 E.2020 Springfield Memo/Report No. 27 Spokane, 1NA 99202 (509) 534-3670 Page 2 OF 3 g~ . OCTOBER 15, 1996 ARRIVED AT PROJECT SITE 9:25 A.M. FOR SCHEDULED DENSITY TESTING OF NATIVE BACKFIL'L AT AUGUSTA LANE UTILITY TRENCH. UPON ARRIVAL, GCI INSPECTION jIAS 1TOTIFIED BY CONTRACTOR THAT W0RK WAS NOT READY FOR TESmING AND jtiTOULD BY RESCHEDULED FOR A LATER DATr.. OCTOBER 17, 1996 .RETURNED TO PROJECT SITE THIS DATE FOR DENSITY TESTING OF NATIVE BACKFILL AT AUGUSTA LANE UTILITY TRENCH(SEE REPORT ABOVE). GCI INSPECTION MONITORED THE INITIAL ONE-FOOT LIFT OF BACKFILL ONLY, USING A MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY OF 139.5 PCF. jaAiER WAS PROVIDED TO ACHIEVE APPROXIMATE OPTIMUM MOISTURE; DENSITY TEST RESULTS WERE AS FOLLOWS: 97.3/ AT NORTH END OF TRENCH(DRY DENSITY OF 135.7 PCF), AND 95.8/ AT SOUTH END QF TRENCH(DRY DENSITY OF 133.7). TRENCH IS APPROXIMATELY 30 FEET LONG. CONTRACTOR PLANS TO BACYFILL THE REMAINING ONE FOOT(APPROXIMATE) IN ELEVATION WITH THE 5/8" MINUS GRAVEL REQUIRED FOR ACP SUBGRADE. OCTOBER 21, 1996 FOLLOWING REGRADING AND COMPACTION, TESTED DENSITY, BY NUCLEAR GAUGE, OF 5/3" MINUS GRAVEL BASE COURSE(ACP SUBGRADE)AT THE NORTH LAPJE OF MISSION AVENUE. NO PROBLEMS WERE ENCOUNTERED. A MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY*OF 138.0 PCF WAS USED FOR TESTING; PROJECT PLANS SPECIFY A MINIMUM OF 95%. TEST RESULTS WERE AS FOLL0WS, LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE: STATION / MOISTURE DRY DENSITY / COMPACTION 19+00 4.7 131.5 PCF 95.3 21+00 5.1 130.6 94.6 23+00 5.0 134.4 97•4 25+00 4.4 132.8 96.2 27+00 4.4 130.8 94.8 29+00 5.0 134.0 97•1 AVERAGE OF ALL TESTS: 95.9/ - THIS WORK WAS SCHEDULED FOR 2:30 P.M. BUT COMPACTION WORK WAS N0T CONiPLET£D UNTIL 4:30 P.M. Q t • . GIFFORD CONSULTA~`fS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers Job No. E-1736-01 E.2020 Springtield Memo/Report No. 27 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 Page 3 OF 3 ~ OCTOBER 22, 1996 MONITORED ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING THIS DATE AT THE NORTH LANE OF MISSION AVENUE. WORK WAS ACCOMPLISHED 14ITH TWO LIFTS TWO AND ONE- HALF INCHES THICK, NO PROBLEMS WERE ENCOUNTERED. GCI INSPECTION PROVIDED DENSITY TESTING BY NUCLEAR GAUGE; AND JOHN MCKERVY OF INLAND PACIFICENGINEERING MONITORED ACP TEMPERATURES AND THICK- PJESS. DENSITY TESTS WERE BASED ON A RICE VALUE OF 154.9 PCF, PROVIDED •BY PETROLEUM SCIENCES, INC., FROM A SAMPLE TAKEN AT THE START OF WORK THIS DATE. PROJECT PLANS SPECIFY A MINIMUM OF 92%. TEST RE- SULTS WERE AS FOLLOWS, LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE: STATION °o COMPACTION 19+00 FIRST LIFT 92.0 21+00 91•8 . 23+00 93.0 25+00 93.2 27+00 92.3 29+00 92.0 • 19+00 SECOND LIFT 94.3 21+00 93.4 23+00 91.8 25+00 92.3 27+00 92.6 29+00 91.8 THE START OF THIS WORK WAS SCHEDULED FOR 8:00 A.M. BUT WAS DELAYED TO 10:30 A.M. . 0 By REV I EWED BY • COPIES T0: PAC IC ROPERTIES(MR- DOUG BIRCH) tAol~ . ~ 1.•~~~ ~ t~d t^ SWPUE N i .r s•~,TE.ST DA~- SIZE ~ ~r76 1 'S:: d N VAOLD _ 5 ! cT~~Vn.o?%F %S \ "r 2 3 4 03 ~ CpMNDAR~ ~~Jj STA ~ ~ST N°' ~ pN~~►ON } MplS~JRE C & MO~, ~r.7co ~~O• ~ ; OF Spil. N►Ot-ID b z. 10.14 t0 t ~ NdE~GN_--" T ~l.. rjQ~ z ~IGH ~ q r - ~ ~ t NET WET . ~E~G= SOtL f pRY ~ > _ = a NET OLp VQF M ~ ENS~N pcf _ ~ ~p9'7 ~ ~ P~ # T~E ~ ~ q t~ y ; s = aF SoiL •1 ~ i o;LA , qT. DF spll.=~ pRY E o Z,t~ 2 ~ ` ,t~ ° ~EtGH~ • 5~ ~a~ ,q~ 12 •~'t ~A~~~~ 'l E ~ ~ ~ , r SO1L , ; WEIGHT ` ~ ~s RE % OF , ~ ''t MpISTU CLPSS . ~ ~tL 3 ~ s cwS1NG 3~ pcf Pp ~ ~1 ~ #4 --..pc{ % ~MV~,~, OENS~TY ' oRY pEN . .S.-~3 - - % !CD ~i = ~ s : s R• J~ ► ; j Rp cOR CK .~URE g. ` • M01S ' ppTl M ~ ~z ~ b lo ~ ; ~ t Fs 1 i 9 i ~ 3 S S , { • 1 , ~i ~ ~ ~ } . • + `t ~ ~ . ENC3►~N~ 45 40 35 t `•s 30 25 zo pF RE (°1o DR`( , pM %o10 - Project No. 1736-03 Memo/Report No. 3 ~ . GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnica/ Engineers E.2020 Springfield Page 1 Of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 EL INSPECTION REPORT ❑ MEMORANDUM f,,Way: Thursday To: Inland Pacific Engineering 707 W. 7 tn Ave. Date: 3/27/97 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7"' Addition City/County Permit No.. Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Project Address: Mission Ave/Holiday Ln. SUBJECT : Concrete Testing _ On site 10:30 a.m. at request of John McKervey of IPE. Weather cloudy, windy, 42°F. Wm. Winkler Co. workers were preparing forms and placing concrete for sidewalks at various locations. I sampled the concrete and made one set of test cylinders to ` g represent the pour. Sampling results as follows: Slump = 6.25" Entr. Air = 1.9% Concrete Temp. = 64° The air content was out of specification. I reported the results to John McKervey. Air entrainment admixture was then added to the remainder of the load (approximately 6 cubic yards). John informed me that the air entrainment was omitted from the load due to computer problems at the batch plant. - Off site 12:00 p.m. ~ . . ....1 . . By . Reviewed By: ~ ` Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) e • . + PM r~roject No. 1736-03 ~ cc: List Initiats Memo/Report No. 4 ~ GIFFORD GONSULTANTS, lNC. Geotechnical Engineeis E.2020 Springfield Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 ~ Page 1- of 1 t~ INSPECTION REPORT a MEMORANDUM ~ To: Inland Pacific Engineering DaY: Monday 707 W. 7t'' Ave., Suite 200 Date: March 31, 1997 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7th Addition 91 City/County Permit No.• . ~ 15 ~9 Project Address: Mission and Holiday. Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson, P.E. A~R Spokane, WA Project Manager SUBJECT : Concrete Inspection On site at 8:00 AM at the request of Mr. John McKervey of Inland Pacific. Weather was partly ~ cloudy and in the 50's. The contractor, VViliiam Winkler Concrete was lacin concrete alon P 9 9 the west curb of Holiday Lane. ~ Approximately 30 cubic yards of mix #3132, 5-3/4 SK, 3000 PSI concrete with 0.5% calcium was placed. I took a total of one set of four compressive strength test cylinders from the first load of concrete along with slump and air content tests. Results were as follows: Specifications ~ Slump 6.5 in. 4- 7 in. Air 9.5% 4.5%-7.5% 5.5% (retest) ~ Concrete Temp 57 deg. 60-90 deg. Concrete cylinders were placed in an insulated storage container and left to cure overnight. Results were reported to John McKervey. Off site at 10:30. d . " ~ ' ~ . . • . . 7 . . . " ~ ~ • • . . . • . . . . . ' - ~ • ~ ~ • ~ . , . . . • - ~ . • , . . _ . By A.- 6'4_'P f.~ =.J.... Reviewed B y Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) _ • ~ • rfoject No. 1736-03 Memo/Report No. 5 ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. ~ Geotechnical En9ineers E.2020 Springfield Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 Page 1 of 1 t~ INSPECTION REPORT o MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering DaY: Tuesday 707 W. 7th Ave., Suite 200 Date: March 31, 1997 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7t'' Addition City/County Permit No.: *Project Address: Mission and Holiday. Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson, P.E. Spokane, WA Project Manager SUBJECT : Concrete Testing (sidewalk) On site at 7:00 AM at the request of Mr. John McKervey of Inland Pacific. Weather was sunny and in the 40's. The contractor, William Winkler Concrete was placing concrete along the north curbing of Mission. Approximately 50 cubic yards of mix #3132, 5-3/4 SK, 3000 PSI concrete with 0.5% calcium was placed. I took a total of one set of four compressive strength test cylinders from the first load of concrete along with slump and air content tests. Results were as follows: _ Specifications Slump 5.5 in. 4- 7 in. Air 6.0% 4.5%-7.5% . Concrete Temp 56 deg. 60-90 deg. Concrete cylinders were placed in an insulated storage container and left to cure overnight. Results were reported to John McKervey. Off site at about 8:30. ~ C.i.T . Reviewed By Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) , ~ , S } r'•y~ ' . . ~ :e ~ ; ~ J %n6 .1 Project No. 1736-03 Memo/Report No. 6 ~ ~ : , GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineers . ' ` E.2020 Springfield Page 1 Of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 • El INSPECTION REPORT 0MEMORANDUM To: inland Pacific Engineering Day: Thursday - 707 W. 7th Ave. Date: 4/3/97 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7'j' Addition City/County Permit No.: Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Project Address: Mission Ave/Holiday'Ln. . SUBJECT : Concrete Testing . On site 10:15 a.m. at request of John McKervey of IPE. Weather cloudy, windy, occ. rain showers, 40°F. Wm. Winkler Co. workers were preparing forms and placing concrete for sidewalks at ~ various locations. At the time of mY arrival, no concrete truck was on site. The nest load arrived at 11:35. I sampled the concrete and made one set of test cylinders to . represent the pour. Sampling results as follows: Slump = 6" Entr. Air = 6.1 % Concrete Temp. = 56° No problems noted. I reported the results to John McKervey. Off site 12:35 p.m. ! 1 I 1 \ ! . . . Reviewed By . . By ~r Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) . ~ ~ . ~ rroject No. 1736-03 Memo/Report No. 7 ~ GIFFORD CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineeis E.2020 Springfield Page 1 Of 1 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 [Z INSPECTION REPORT 0 MEMORANDUM To: Inland Pacific Engineering . Day: Monday 707 W.. 7t" Ave. Date: 4/7/97 Spokane, WA 99204 Project: Riverwalk 7~" Addition City/County Permit No.: Attn: Mr. Jerry Peterson Project Address: Mission Ave/Holiday Ln. SUBJECT : Concrete Testing On site 10:30 a.m. at request of John McKervey of IPE. Weather clear, 50°F. ~ Wm. Winkler Co. workers were preparing forms and placing concrete for sidewalks at various locations along Salmon River Ln. I sampled the concrete and made one set of test cylinders to represent the pour. Sampling results as follows: ~ Slump = 7.25" ~ Entr. Air = 6.2% Concrete Temp. = 58° I reported the results to John McKervey. Off site 2:15 p.m. _ ~ ~ . By......... .v! ...........:....1......~.N.`.~............. Reviewed By: Copies to: Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) - • ~ . ~ G/FFORD CONSUL TANTS, /NC. project reference no. 1736-03 Geotechnical Engineeis 2020 E. Spiingfield A ve., Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 FAX (509) 534-2925 960-7tl . ~ OF TRA NS ~~IIT TA L LETTER . . , date: Ma y 1, 1997 elAi ~ to: /n/and Pacific Engineering Y Z~ggl 707 West 7th A venue Spokane, WA 99204 ~ .p.~ • , attention: Mr. Jerry Peterson ~ We are sending the follo wing items: ✓ a ttached . -under separa te co ver - no./copies 3 Compressive Strength Test Reports, -3125197-3127197 Riverwalk 7t`' Addition these are transmitted: as requested _ for your use ✓ for your retention for review with corrections _for action specified please return b y: .remarks: b y: A. Gj:22,,_ ~ - - . . . . , ~ copies to: Central Pre-Mix, Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) C ~ ,.-FORD CONSUL TANTS, f'7C. ~ GEUTECHNICAL ENGINEERS E. 2020 Springlief0 Ave. Spokane, WA 99202 I509/ 534-3670 ~ SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT PROJECT: Riverwalk 7`h Addn. BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-01 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Garry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: Barker and Mission SUBCONTRACTOR: Winkler Construction CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Sunny DATE OF REPORT: 3-25-97 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 45° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) MATERIAL SAMPLED: : Concrete DATE SAMPLED: ; 3-25-97 . SAMPLED BY: : C. Knapp TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: ' 20 LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: ; Holiday Lane Sidewalk YDS.3, BATCH / CUMULATIVE: : 10 : 10 SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: ; STA 11+90 Rt. DELNERY TICKET NO.: ~ 7918 . ............................................................•....I. .......................................................................................................................A........... SPECIMEN TYPE: 6" x 12" cylinder BATCH TIME / END TIME / AGE : 7:30 ; 8:20 : 50 . . • : ...........................................................A............A............I.......•... : 4: ~ }i::: : i: :'r: : }}i: : : ~ SS}i?}:.; v::: . ~ •'.:::::•i L : . ~r ti,ti:~:.:' i:v. ~ :•:•:•:•}:{•ti: . •v•..:~::::.. • t.. ~ :.;':v,{•}::.:ti::.:.. : . . hvr........... ::....::.v: WABL W E A'TER: ALLO 37 . . . . . . : SUPPLIER: ~ Central Pre-Mix WATER BEFORE/AFTER ; 10 c 0 , . . . .................................................................I.........................:................................. .....•......................................................../..................A...•..............- MIX NO.: ::3132 SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: : Truck Chute . - SACK CONTENT: c 5-3/4 SK FIELD TESTS : SPEC. : ACTUAL , . . ...........................................................I......•.................................................... .....r....................... ......•...•.I..•...............A................. TYPE CEMENT: IA SLUMP, in. (ASTM C 143): 7" max 6" ..................~~~...........................J. .~~~~~....~~~.~.~....~~...............~...~...~..............I. .~..~~~~~~~..~~.A.~..~~~~.~.~..... ~ MAX: AGG: SIZE : 3/4............. . .CONC: ''EMP:'.~F..~ASTMCtosa►:....... ~ 60.~...... : 60........... DFSIGN STRENGTH, psi: : 3000 AIR CONTENT, %(ASTM C 2311: : 4.5-7.0 : 6.0 , . . . ADMIXTURES ADDED AT : AEA, CA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (ASTM C 1381: i. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: W/C RATIO: . . . , , Abbreviations: AEA=Air Enaaining Admiztwe WRA=Water Reducer HRIVR=High Range Water Reducer (Superplasticizer) FR=Fiber Reinforcanent CA=Calcium Chloride Accelerator NCA=Non-Chloride Accelerator. FA=Fly Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.-not recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) , • - TOTAL SPECIMEN ~ DATE DATE AGE, TESTED ~ LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LABNO. FIELD NO. RECEIVED TESTED DAYS ' BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI 97-0196 17360325A 3-26 4-1 7 TB 74,520 28.44 2,620 .....................i...................... .......................i..........................:.........................._ 0197 B " 422 28 CK 124,340 28.56 4,355 . . 0198 C " 4-22 28 CK 124,180 28.56 4,350 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .....................1...........................I......................... ~.....................i..................... ~.........................i........................... 0199 D ° - - ' - ~ ~ ~ REQUIRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3,000 iD MEETS SPECIFICATION - ~ ACTUAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,350 ; O FAILS SPECIFICATION , Notes ~ : TDH Pro'ect Cylinder #65,66,67 Technician Signature _ • : TORD CONSUL TANTS, C. GEUTECHN/CAL ENGINEERS E. 2020 Springlield Ave. Spokane, WA 99202 /5091 534-3670 MPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT ~ SAMPLING AND CO . PROJECT: Riverwalk 7' Addn. BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-03 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Gerry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: Mission and Holiday SUBCONTRACTOR: Wm. Winkler Concrete CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Sunny DATE OF REPORT: 3-26-97 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 50° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) MATERIAL SAMPLED: : Concrete DATE SAMPLED: ~ 3-26-97 .......................................................................................................................a...................................... SAMPLED BY: ; T. Gilman TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: :10 , LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: : Salmon River Blvd. YDS.3, BATCH / CUMULATIVE: : 20 30 , . .................................................................I. .......................................................................................................................I. ................d...........•....... SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: i Rt. Sidewalk DELIVERY TICKET NO.: ~ 79298 . . SPECIMEN TYPE: : 6" x 12" cylinder BATCH TIME / END TIME / c 8:50 ::9:40 ; 50 , . . . ...........................................................A............A............ . . : '•""r'::::::.. •..~.•::::.y.•::•:'y•:}::}::~ .:;;~:::.f::•.'..: " . ' ' ~ • ~ } 15•:•:.:Y:: • ~ ~':'J: f.Yl:::.: : : . ..1: •i: i ~ . . ...i. ~ : .::?]:}iit:: - ti ~ •.ti•.•.:•.•: . • .•._r•:::' : .....•::.:L1•}:::: •.'.•::r'::.~: •:::::l.l.•J.•::::.:. . • ........1.. . . . .....ry - . . . ALLOWABLE WATER• 35 gal SUPPLIER: i CPM WATER BEFORE/AFTER c 10 i 0 , MIX NO.: i 3132 SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: : End of Hose ~ , SACK CONTENT: ::5 3/4 FIELD TESTS : SPEC. : ACTUAL .i . . TYPE CEMENT: IA SLUMP, in. (ASTM C 143): 7 max 7.5" . MAX. AGG. SIZE: ' 3/4 CONC. TEMP., °F IasTM c1osa): : 64-90 : 58° ~ ..................................................................I.......................................................... _ .............................................................J................... DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: ? 3000 AIR CONTENT, %(ASTM C 231k c 4.0-7.0 : 6.0 . ADMIXTURES ADDED AT : AEA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (ASTM C 138): i n/a .............................................................i. ................o................. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: W/C RATIO: . : n/a . , Abbreviations: AEA=Air Entraining Admixturc WRA=Water Reducer HIZVVR=High Range Water Reducer (Superplasticizer) FR=Fiber Reinforcement CA=Calcium Chloride Accelera[or NCA=Non-Chloride Accelerator FA=FIy Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=not recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) , ~ TOTAL SPECIMEN DATE DATE AGE, TESTED : LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LABNO. FIELD NO. RECEIVED TESTED DAYS BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI 97-0220 17360326A 3-27 42 7 TDB 95,840 28.56 3,360 . 0221 B 423 28 - CK 126,660 28.56 4,440 0222 C 423 28 CK 121,420 28.56 4,250 . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . 0223 D H ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ REQUIRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3000 i] MEETS SPECIFICATION ACTLJAL A'VERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,345 0 FAILS SPECIFICATION ~ Notes: Technician Signature C '--")-FORD CONSUL TANTS, [``C, GEO TECHN/CA L ENGINEERS E. 2020 Sprtnglield Ave. Spokane, WA 99202 1509J 534-3670 ~ SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT PROJECT: Riverwalk 70'Addn. BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-03 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Gerry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: Mission and Holiday SUBCONTRACTOR: Wm. Winkler Concrete CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Partly Cloudy DATE OF REPORT: 3-27-97 AMBIENT TEMPER.ATURE: 50° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) ' MATERIAL SAMPLED: : Concrete DATE SAMPI;ED: : 3-27-97 SAMPLCD BY: ; T. Barber TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: ; 50 ...........................................................t. .......................................................................................................................a................... LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: : Sidewalks YDS.3, BATCH / Ci7MULATIVE: : 10 30 ..................................................................J........................................................... ..............................................................J..................A................... SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: ~ DELIVERY TICKET NO.: ~ n.s. , . SPECIMEN TYPE: ~ 6" x 12" cylinder BATCH TIME / END TIME ~ 10:40 ; 11:45 ; 65 . r':ti:; ; ~ r : • : _ - - . , r:: : ~:x:::::<:::::::::>::::::::::_: - r:ti::;r.::::::;.>:: . • ~::t•::•>:: r:•::~::•r~`~:::.'...:.:2:::.: ~•`•:t~ ~ ~ ' n•: . ...::•:,•:.:...ti . : :~~;:.,t . • ti•:: . .:.ti}.::•:: t;~ar.ti;. ~ . . . . ALLOWABL WATER: 31 al g . . . SUPPLIER: : CPM WATER BEFORE/AFTER ? 6 :0 • .....................................................J................................................ ...............................••..•....................•.............J. ................A............•...•.. ~ MIX NO.: : 3132 SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: ; End of Hose • SACK CONTENT: : 5 3/4 FIELD TESTS c SPEC. ; ACTUAL TYPE CEMENT: II SLUMP, in. (ASTM C 143): 7 M3X 6.25" , . . , . . MAX. AGG. SIZE: 3/4 CONC. TEMP., °F IASTM C 1064l: 60-90 64° ~ ' DESIGN STRENGTH, psi. ~ 3000 AIR CONTENT, % IASTM C 2311: : 4.0-7.0 : 1.9 , . . - . ADMIXTURES ADDED AT ~ CA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (ASTM C 138): : n/a . .................................................................s........................................................... .............................................................4..................d................. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: ; AEA* W/C RATIO: . : n/a , Abbreviatioas: AEA= Air Entraining Admixture VN'RA=Water Reducer HRWR=High Range Water Reducer (Superplasticizer) FRaFiber Reinforcemcnt CA=Calcium Chloride Accelerator T`CA=Non-Chloride Accelerator FA=Fly Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=not recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) ~ TOTAL SPECIMEN DATE DATE AGE, TESTED : LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LABNO. FIELD NO. RECEIVED TESTED DAYS BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI , • ~ 97-0224 17360327A 3-28 43 7 1102524 28.50 3,880 . 0225 B 424 28 TG 149,480 28.50 5,245 0226 C 4-24 28 TG 1302200 28.50 4,570 . ; . . . . . . . . 0227 D H . . . . . . . . . . . . • _ ~ REQUIRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3000 iD MEETS SPECIFICATION ~ ACTUAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,905 , 0 FAILS SPECIFICATION Notes: * Load batched without AEA, added to last 6 cy. on site. No. Number, computer was down. Technician Signature . ~ , • e'D Y ' ~ggl ~ ~ ~ /FFORD CONSULTANTS, /NC, project reference no. 1736-03 Geotechnical Engineers 2020 E. Springfield A ve., Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 FAX (509) 534-2925 8 ~ . LETTER OF TRANS[41TTAL . . da te: Ma y 2, 1997 . to: /n/and Pacific Fngineering 707 West 7t'' A venue Spokane, WA 99204 . a tten tion: Mr. Jerry Pe terson We are sending the fol%wing items:,.. ✓ attached ° under separa te co ver _ no./copies 3 Compressive Strength Test Reports, 313 1/97-.4/3/97 Riverwa/k 7t`' Addition these are transmitted: as requested _ for your use ✓ for your retention for review with corrections _for action specified please re turn b y: remarks: -by: 4.1 6J'7~'-r. . . . copies to: Central Pre-Mix, Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) . . . C--gzFORD CONSUL TANTS, Gc • ~ECHN/CA L ENGINEERS . E. 2020 Springfield Ave. Spokane, WA 99202 15091 534-3670 ~ SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT PROJECT: Riverwalk 7`h Addn. BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-03 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Gerry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: Mission and Holiday SUBCONTRACTOR: Wm. Wink]er Concrete CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Partly Cloudy DATE OF REPORT: 3-31-97 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 50° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) ~ MATERIAL SAMPLED: ; Concrete DATE SAMPLED: ~ 3-31-97 , SAMPLLD BY: : T. Gilman TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: ; 50 . LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: : Sidewalks YDS.', BATCH / CUMULATIVE: ~ 10 30 • J. ..............................................................I. A................... SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: : Mission past Holiday DELIVERY TICKET NO.: : 79602 ................................................................I. .........................................•....•......•.....•..A....................................... SPECIMEN TYPE: : 6" x 12" cyfinder BATCH TIME / END TIME 8:40 : 10:00 : 30 ~ .............................................................A............A............I........... ; f~ ' _ ' ' ' ~:ti1:. ~ l:•:':::': f: ~ .M1 ~ ~ . ~ . ' ' ~ • • ~ • • . f... • :ti\ }Y~1~•lJJ.{•.:•. V.1tiY•Y.~.~:.:' . ATER: WABLE W .:vv 35 ALLO .l.{kV.:'.......••.~~. r • L . ga ::fi::: : . 'h..•::::t~:: •.v~:r'o::: • ::v::~:.. ::;h~:fr:::~::• ••:r~:• r.......: ~x•:......v.. r...ti . i. _ SUPPLIER: - c CPM WATER BEFOREIAFTER ? 10-12 c 0 . MIX NO.: : 3132 SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: : End of Hose . ~ SACK CONTENT: : 5 3/4 FIELD TESTS : SPEC. : ACTUAL , . . ...............................................................J........................................................... .............................................................I..................A....... TYPE CEMENT: IA SLUMP, in. (asTM c1as1: 7 max 6.5" . MAX. AGG. SIZE: : 3/4 CONC. TEMP., °F IasrM c tosal: : 60-90 : 57° ~ . . . ~ 4.0-7.0 : 9.5/5.5 DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: : 3000 AIR CONTENT, % IASTM C 2311: ~ . :...........i........................................................... j. ................w................. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT : CA, AEA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (ASTM C 138): n/a , d................. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: , W/C RATIO: . : n/a Abbreviations: AEA=Air Emraining Admixture WRA=Water Reducer HRWR=High Range VVater Reducer (Superplasticiur) FR=Fiber Reinforcement CA=Calcium Chloride Accelerator NCA=Non-Chloride Accelerator FAsfly Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=not recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) , TOTAL SPECIMEN DATE DATE AGE, TESTED : LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LABNO. FIELD N0. RECEIVED TFSTED DAYS BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI . ~ 97-0240 17360331A 49 9 CK 120,580 28.5 4;230 ~ 0241 B 4-28 28 CK 136,440 28.56 4,780 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0242 C 4-28 28 CK 136,080 28.56 4,765 .....................i...........................i. .......................i.....................i.....................i. ...................i. .......................a..........................i.......................... 0243 D H .........................i..................... . . . . . ; . REQUIRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: ~ 3000 k] MEETS SPECIFICATION ACTUAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,770 0 FAILS SPECIFICATION a Notes: First air test at 9.5%, retested at 5.5%. Technician Signature . . ~ GKFORD CONSUL TANTS, GE, ~ ECHN/CAL ENGINEERS E. 2020 Spring!!e/d Ave. Spokene, WA 99202 1509) 534-3670 SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT ~ PROJECT: Riverwalk 7`hAddn. BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-03 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Gerry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: Mission and Holiday, SUBCONTRACTOR: Wm. Winkler Concrete CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Clear DATE OF REPORT: 4-1-97 . AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 40° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) MATERIAL SAMPLED: ~ Concrete DATE SAMPLED: ; 4-1-97 , SAMPLFn BY: T. Gilman TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: : 50 - LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: ; Sidewalks YDS.3, BATCH / CUMULATIVE: ~ 10 ' 10 , . SPECIFTC SAMPLE LOCATION: : Mission DELIVERY TICKET NO.: : 79656 . .................................................................I.................................................... A..................................... SPECLViEN TYPE: : 6" x 12" cylinder . BATCH TIIvfE / END TIME / : 6:50 ; 8:00 : 70 -:1,. ~ - .............................................................w............w............ - - - ~ ~ ~ rr::::: . tiv., ;.1{. ti::.: ~ : • - - . . }r.• . ?t r~'r}.?;::::::..; }•,::ti• fi$f.•ttiv;.•.•;:: {:::•:yi{i::.:: , . . ~ ?i:•i: ii: :v:. ..2:_.}..; . :}:4i}}ri•. +ti} : ..-0t•~ .~}.~\'~~'.~i ~:'v}}Y.•:.•:•r::~$$::: WABLE WATER: 33 al ~ L AL O g :~•;.........r..~.. . . . . . . . . _ SUPPLIER: CPM WATER BEFORE/AFTER ; 10 : 0 , MIX NO.: ; 3132 , SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: : End of Hose SACK CONTENT: : 5 3/4 FIELD TESTS ~ SPEC. : ACTUAL . TYPE CEMENT: IA SLUMP, in. {ASTM C 1431: ~ 7 max 5.5" . MAX. AGG. SIZE: •3/4 CONC. TEMP., °F (asTni c1osa): 60-90 56° ~ . . , ; . DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: : 3000 AIR CONTENT, oJ IASTM C 231): ?4.0-7.0 :6.0 _ . ADMIXTURES ADDED AT ? CA, AEA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (ASTM C 136): : n/a . . . . . . . ; ; ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: W/C RATIO: • : n/a . , Abbrevtat[ons: AEA=Air Entraining Admixture WRA=Water Reducer tiRWR=High Range Watcr Reducer (Superpfasticizer) FR=Fiber Reinforcement CA=Calcium Chloride Accelerator NCA=Non-Chloride Accelerator FA=Fly Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=noc recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) ~ . TOTAL SPECIMEN DATE DATE AGE, TESTED : LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LABNO. FIELD NO. RECEIVED TESTED DAYS BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI 97-0251 17360401A 42 - 4-8 7 TDB 91,420 28.48 3,210 .....................4...........................1. .......................J.....................J.....................~. .......................i..........................i..........................- 0252 B 4-29 28 CK 114,160 28.56 4,000 . .......................i........................................... 0253 C 429 28 CK 122,100 28.56 4,280 . . . . . . . . . 0254 D H , , . . . . . . ~.....................a..................... .........................a..........................a........................... ~...........................i. i.....................i.....................i. ...................i. .......................i..........................i.........................._ REQUIRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3000 iC7 MEETS' SPECIFICATION ACTLJAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH^ PSI: 4,140 D FAILS SPECIFICATION Notes: Technician Signature . V. G:.. FORD CONSUL TANTS, /PC. Gi: ECHN/CAL ENGINEERS ' ~ ~ E. 2020 Springlield Ave. Spokane, WA 99202 15091534-3670 ' SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT ~ PROJECT: Riverwalk 7' Addn. BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-03 GENER.AL CONTRACTOR: Gerry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: Mission and Holiday SUBCONTRACTOR: Wm. Winkler Concrete CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Cloudy, Windy DATE OF REPORT: 4-3-97 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 40° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) , MATERIAL SAMPLED: : Concrete DATE SAMPLED: ; 43-97 . SAMPLCU BY: ; T. Barber TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: ; 10 . LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: ; Sidewalks YDS.3, BATCH / CtJMULATIVE: ; IO 10 SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: : Mission and Salmon DELIVERY TICKET NO.: ? 79959 ..................................................................1.......................................................... . ..............................................................A..................................... SPECIMEN TYPE: :6" x 12" cytinder BATC,H,TIME / END TIME / ? 11:21 : 12:20 ~ 60 . . . ...................................•..A............A...........•~.•........_ ......::{~:+:.._...::""rr- . ..:y~::}::;:'}i }:4:5:.:•.:::::::iii}:'•.:::::i.~ v.: • . i:'v:•:v:vii • ~ • ~ . . . . ~ ~ : • • ••ti•: ' . :titi:. : :y::i::S{:.'•:;si;}~ ~ _ . ~:2':;':: . ;1 . • . h.!': '.t: ~ • ~ lJJ:::::•:::::•:.'::.'}}:•.A ~ . . . : . .•i }i i } {yi i 1:.:: .r:::::•:::> . ~ ALLOWABLE . . WATER: 38 al • l.•: . . : ~...•.•t: • . Jf•.{.rM1'.•.•.'.• ~ . ' ~ . ~ . • . . . . . g . SUPPLIER: CPM WATER BEFORE/AFTER 8 • 2 MIX NO.: ::3132 . SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: : End of Hose ~ . ~ ~ SACK CONTENT: ; 5 314 FIELD TESTS ; SPEC. ; ACTUAL TYPE CEMENT: I-II _ SLiJMP, in. (ASTM C 143): 7 max 6" . MAX. AGG. SIZE: : 3/4 CONC. TEMP., °F (ASTM C 1064): : 60-90 : 56° ~ DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: ; 3004 AIR CONTENT, %(ASTM C 231): c 4.0-7.0 : 6.1 ADMIXTURES ADDED AT ' CA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf IASTM'C 138l: ? n/a j. ................o................. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITfi: , W/C RATIO: . 1: n/a Abbreviadons: AEA=Air Entraining Admixture VVRA=Water Reducer HRWR=High Range Water Reducer (Superplasticizer) FR=Fiber Reinforcement CA=Calcium Chloride Accelerator NCA=Nen-Chloride Acceterator FA=Fly Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=not recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) TOTAL SPECIMEN DATE DATE AGE, TESTED : LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LABNO. FIELD N0. RECEIVED TESTED DAYS BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI 97-0279 17360403A 44 4-10 7 CK 75,240 28.42 2,650 0280 B 5-1 28 CK 133,240 28.56 4,670 . 0281 C 5-1 28 CK 137,160 28.56 4,800 .....................s...........................i.........................i.....................i.....................i.....................i.........................i..........................a.......................... . 0282 D H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1......................... ~.....................J...................../. ...................1. .......................4..........................1........................... REQL7IRED AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3000 0 MEETS SPECIFICATION ACTIJAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, FSI: 4,735 ❑ FAILS SPECIFICATION ~ Notes: Technician Signature - • ~ - / i,~,~%-~ ~ i..~. C.iM ~'R aR.~A~ • I ~ f _~p ~ GIFFORD CONSUL TANTS, /NC. ~ project reference no. 1736-03 Geotechnica/ Engineers 2020 E. SpringfieJd A ve., Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 534-3670 FAX (509) 534-2925 LETTER OF TRANS111ITTAL i~k'~'~~~ ~~~~i`~ r~.~'~~'~ ~ date: May 16, 1997 L 19to: /n/and Pacific Engineering MAY 1991 707 W. 7rh A venue, Suite 200 IRE Spokane, WA 99204 . attention: . . ~We are sending the fol%wing items: ✓ attached under separa te co ver no./copies 1 Compressive Strength Test Report, 417197 Riverwalk 7th Addition these are transmitted: _as requested _ for your use ✓ for your retention for review with corrections for action specified . please ie turn b y: remarks: . : . b y: 4 C~Jrnz~ ~ copies to: Central Pre-Mix, Pacific Properties (Mr. Doug Birch) P ~ ~ GTFORD CONSUL TANTS, . GEOTECHNICAL ENCINEERS E. 2020 Springfield Ave. Spokene, WA 99202 1509/ 534-3670 0 SAMPLING AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST REPORT , PROJECT: River«►alk 7'h Addn. BUILDING PERMIT NO.: GCI JOB NO.: 1736-03 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Gerry and Sons PROJECT ADDRESS: Mission and Holiday SUBCONTRACTOR: Wm. Winkler Concrete CITY, STATE: Spokane, WA WEATHER AT TIME OF SAMPLING: Clear DATE OF REPORT: 4-7-97 AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 50° SAMPLING DATA (ASTM C 31) MATERIAL SAMPLED: : Concrete DATE SAMPLED: ~ 4-7-97 . SAMPLEll BY: ; T. Barber TOTAL YDS. THIS POUR: : 7.5 . LOCATION OF PLACEMENT: ; Sidewalks YDS.3, BATCH / CUMUI.ATNE: :7.5 ? 7.5 . ~.................................................................J........................................................... ..............................................................I..................A................... SPECIFIC SAMPLE LOCATION: Yndiana and Salmon DELIVERY TICKET NO.: : 60216 SPECIMEN TYPE: . : 6" x 12" cylinder BATCH TIME / END TIME / ; I2:53 : 2:00 : 67 . . . - - - - :.r:: - - - . . : . : : ;.:ti:::::::•::<:::.; ~ . . . : . ..:~::~.~::~::•::~~:::::::::::::::::::..:::.:::....~.:~:::::r:.::.;. ..~::f},~::: . .:.v . . .....::ti:. ALLOWABLE WATER• 20 ga1 . . : SUPPLIER: : CPM WATER BEFORElAFTER ; 10 c 0 ..................................................................I. ...............•..........•...................................I. .•..............A................... MIX NO.: : 3132 SAMPLE OBTAINED FROM: ; End of Hose . SACK CONTENT: c 5 3/4 ~ FIELD TESTS : SPEC. ; ACTi1AL .......................•........................................•.I• ................A....•.•.......... , . . TYPE CEMENT: I-II SLLJMP, in. lasTM c 143►: 7 max 7.25" , . . . MAX. AGG. SIZE: 3/4 CONC. T"EMP., °F (ASTM C 1064): 60-90 58° CD . ~ • DESIGN STRENGTH, psi: ~ 3000 AIR CONTENT, %(ASTM C 231): • L 4.0-7.0 ; 6.2 ..................................................................I. • •...............A................. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT ? CA, AEA UNIT WEIGHT, pcf (AST,M C 138): c n/a ..................................................................i........................................................... .............................................................i..................d................. ADMIXTURES ADDED AT SITE: , W/C RATIO: n/a , Abbreviations: AEA=Air Entraining Admixture WRA=Water Reducer HRWR=High Range Waur Reducer (Superplasticizer) FR=Fiber Reinforcement CA=Calcium Chloride Accelerator NCA=Non-Chloride Acceterator FA=FIy Ash n.s.=not supplied n.r.=not recorded n.t.=not tested COMPRESSION TEST DATA (ASTM C 39) ~ TOTAL • ~ SPECIlviEN DATE DATE AGE, TESTED : LOAD, AREA, STRENGTH, LABNO. FIELD NO. RECEIVED TESTED DAYS BY LBS. SQ. IN. PSI 97-0271 17360407A 48 ~ 414 7 100,140 28.50 31510 . 0272 g 5-5 28 CK 132,400 28.56 4,640 ~ 0273 C 5-5 28 CK 130,220 28.56 4,560 0274 D H . REQUI1tED AvERAGE zs-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 3000 k] MEETS SPECIFICATION ' ACTLJAL AVERAGE 28-DAY STRENGTH, PSI: 4,600 O FAILS SPECIFICATION Notes: Technician Signature o ~ o .~c . INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: SPOKANE COIIN'i'Y ENGINEERS , . 10*26 West Broadway Avenue DATE: Sevtember -20, 1996 Spokane,.WA 99260 ' - I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th Description M~ Xerox Prints Lxj Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing fI Contract Documents Work Authorization LILI Report r~ No. Copies Description 1 Daily Inspection Reports #1 through #13 covering the period 7-17-96 throuQh 8-15-96. 1 Letter to Bill Johns, Suokane Countv Eneineers dated 7-31-96. PUIpOSe r xI Information - Review & Comments MI Per Your Request MI Written Approval I~ Signature & Return Remarks . J ..T • ~ y . Signe ~ - CC: Doug irch, Pacific Properties - v D:iTRNSMT.PMS .i - • • • . M1 . "VE INLAND PACIFIC DAlLY FIELD REPO ENGINEERltVG . . . . . . Date fnspectors Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.: Arcival Time ~60?0 r r . ea er . . , _ Jags ~vo.. oY ~ : . K' s - , ~ . Loaal Representat~vel phone nurnber Client & ff Z,3Z3 ' ;~•r ~S . . ~ J r l Contractor e e sen v p one number Genera Subcontractor • . IPE ProJect Mana erl phone ny mber /N ~ I / '~.5 r . . . tPE Field Representattve rJ(> ~ i? ru C. eAwo vW ~/l,c.,,~,~ ~ , Manpower & Equipment Used X ~ A?epi - / Fa r-e e -rle, uJ X4e,l ~ ~~a ✓ Se ~ c~ P_ r~- ~ ~ a.~-r ~ T ~~C! Comments: a:14G~~ ' ~j~S 7r'l~ ~Je (Work Completed Apparently y . . perSpecifications Problems and their Sotutlons) ° r - w Q..~ a 1604 WJ 1 / . . , a ~ l~P.~ ~oue.- Q~ ~o f'o~ cc Q v~ P. 7~~-r l * S14`! ~ S~' • C•~ r/ l cn ~t ,la ~ F' /1 t/ ~ ~ i ✓ ~ K t . . . . d ~ 7~r'tt ~ f P~vr A,~ ~CJ~C t~c ~P. x Gc~ e t Su c O s~J - - . . ~ ~`v . /1 . ~ . :1PEE FiELD REPRESEN'i'AT{VE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE s document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until revelwed and slgned by the tPE Thl construction engineer andlor-iPE project manager. ' . Date Date 1 ~ • 7j c' • IP CONftRUCTlON ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT MANAGER Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: ' .:J:I^.. . . . ................ro_.:r-'~„~...............-:r.v<+~_. . . . . . v w . INLn'N° oAILY FtELa REP~ PACIFIC . - ` ewENGINEERIN.G% - ' T. oate Inspector's Daity Report No.: ~ . ~ . . ~ . ~ _ ~ . . : . 7 IPE Project No. Oage No. ~ ~ . ~ - - Comments. ~f- ~ ~t,~ a~,< ~ . ~ (VYoric Compteted Appamndy , '~'1 n perSpecfflcations,Pno6lems artd theirSolutlcns) ~~/e G o w t~,..L` A 1' e~c. ed S~ G~ Wv4:1r1jLZ9 ~ l~f./ _ c.J ' Qr/ f..~~ d•T r~~ t' ~r~ i r- F~t •~t ! a-r ~ r) ~ ~ _,~O 71 L P e lP~'l 4o ~ ~ v/r ~ r / 4 d 14 9 P ff 1'~ c(a Y a . . . 1~ ~ C•{. ~ I^ 1 K '~"Lc,C- ~~C~(> S~ YA~ 5X o Gl t`Q 7"'! ~D n Aw 4 t4~,1~ p lA-.-'t , ~ '_f~ SGlf / ~i ,.u ~ vr &Jr-le S , ~1~1 a_ a . ~ ~ - a K 1-vt r* r J 0 ~ V o ce tc~ a c ^0'7"- ~ 1~1~ t .~P n c.~e.. L r r~ n c~r . J ! f/ f/G E~a~ : l~ n U ~~P7 U OL 4NOXo . ro J~~r.~~ . . . ~ . . . IPE Fie(d Rep IPE CE {PE PM Contractor's Rep 1 / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~I ~ i r i ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ y~,.. - ~ , ~ ~`~v, . _ ~ ~ ~ 190.7/19.7 N ' i y 2 192,5/19.6 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~ ~ 1 i/ ~ ~ 4 5 6 7 8 ~ / ~ , , 3 _ . - ~i ~ r 1 i ` ~ I~ \ \ MH, 7H ' ~ ~ 9 , i 1 , ~ 2 , ' ~~1 191,1/19.3 N ~ ~ _ ?J /i ~ \ MH 7 . ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~;~J~ ~ ~ 13 12 ~ ~ . 2 ~ 10 \ r ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MH 7G ` ~ ~ 4 2 TRACT A, \ \ ~I\ ~ r1 1 IL/ I \ ~ \ , ~ 3 ~ ' , ~ ` r ~ \ 191.6/i9.6 N ~ , ` \ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ TRACT "A" ' r'~ 4 ~ , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~9~.a/~a.~ N ~ ~ , u~ \ . : Ah , / ` 1 , . . /i ~ 5 ~f / ' / \ ' ~ 1 / ,Y,, ~ ~ - . ~ \ . ~ , ~ / / " ~ . ~ 1. ~ , s 2 ~ u 3 i ~~18~ ~ r ~/'rv ~ 190.5/18.2 N MH 7J ~ , t ~ ~ ~i ~ 3 s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 4 5 6 7 ~ . ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~r21~ ~ ; ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ 192.4/18.0 N 192, ~ 8 ~ EXI~T, MH 12' r \ 2 ~ MH _ _ _ (RIVE~RWAt~( 1,~T~ ADDN.~~ ~ ~ 191,9/18.3 N ~ ~'i \ ~ --M \ / ~ 2Q - MH 7R ~ ;i / ' ~ ~ MH 7b ~ . - ~ . „R~, 9~► 10 ~ ~ - - - i: ~ EXIST. MH t ~ ~ 9 192,4/18.1 N ~ i~ ~ (RIVERWAL A ~ ~ ~ 9 . ~ ~ ~ 190.8/ 17.9' ~ . ~ 2 ~ ~ ; ~ 16 ~ ~ ~ 1 , ~ ~ 8 ~ 6 7S 191.6/17.3 N , I 4 2 ' 14. ~ ~ ~a9.s/».3 N ~ 15 . ~ 3 ~ , . ~ 7 ~ ` 192.0/ 17,1 N ~ ~ , ~ 11 ~ ~ ► 20 ,s,.or,~.s N ~ I ~ ` 6 fi 8 g ~ / ~ MH 7E j 1 ~ 9 ~v~3 / , ~ 5 r I~H 7A j 5~~► l 17 192.4/17.1 N 10 ' ' . ~b a ~ ~ 18 , ~ 190.6/16.9 N ~ 19 ~ ~ ~ 18 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~:1 a.o o.o N 1 fi . ` ~ t I ~ 17 3 ~ ~ 2p 3 , I ~ ~ ; • i ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ i ~ ~ 6 190.6/16.3 ~N ~ M 7p ~ 5 / 2 ~ 192.4/16.3 N ~ L~. ~ MH 78 . a , ~ I r ~I . ( ~ , .3 _ ~ MH 7F > N ~ 15 1 14 22 ~ , , , ' ~ TRACT "C' . TRACT "B" ~ 1 ~ ` ~ ` ~ ~ ~ MISSION AVENUE ~ . 1J►- Rive~ w~ 7 . r:<<d~~~a~~t ~ ~ . ! ~sk~r 1~ ~~~~6~~ . , . . . tNLAND . PACIFIC OA1LY FIELD REPO ENGINEERING . , . . . . . . ilh°/'' l~ ' . Date InspectoYs Daily Report No.s Twry Arrival Time ~ lPE ProJect No.: Wealher . ~page No.. • ot ne number Client f L al Represe;,,kve, ~ntractor ,~.~'I ~5 r.(a 6~ Z 323 Genera Site resen v e numner contractor . •iPE Project Manager/ phone numbe Sub ( •-i--.~r t'~ /'Z . ~ ' Af ~ / / l'_ P ~e~u.! OY ~'l ~ , IPE Field RepresentatJve~ a, - ~(3 ~ In _ Man ower & Equ ment Used , ~ Comments: ~(Wock Completed Apparently -LzG1"- at_~ elZd~ e-?63&et.,60-C)perSpecifications Problems and thelr S6lutions) ~ 1~t i t ~ 6~ ~ f ~ Gt r Gr ~T rr ~~i 1.~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~~r ~f "i 1~. e'~ ~t r. C3 l~ .0 5S I v i ~ ~ -,,a *0"t iz ('0:7.eA--r~/, d~- S~o ~s'. ~CJ e °i. . ~ . . d lC'_'~4 M W &4-A.,1 7`"_~~~•-~._ ~ ~l•~ ,9 ` ~~~4.•~, ~ - _ - IPE FlEl.O REPRESE IVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . , . This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untll revelwed and signed by the tPE construction engjneer a dlo~-'IPE project manager. • : • Date Date . . ~i . ~ ~r• z,~ , ~ tP COOtTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT lVIANAGER ~ • . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ - _ . . . , . . o . 1! INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REP - :ENGINEERIN.G • Ilei! ~ lnspector's Oaity Report No.: T Oate . / . . ~ ~ ! ~ ~ . . IPE Project No. ~'age tvo. . ot- ~ , Comments: L°,C AA, ~J d,1brtg (Work Completed ApparentJy ~ ~ ~ . . perSpeclfications,Probtems and their Solutlons) a u . ~ ~ ~ . 0 e. t *44-~ 1 ~ . 400 ~ - ~ Non-Conforming Items: ~ ~ ~ . . (Projector Standani Speciflcatton . . . ~ , ~ Observed Construction ts in Non-Compllance wtth) - . ~ 1PE Fiald Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 0 - INLAND . . PACiFiC : DAILY FIELD REPO r ENGINEERING _ . v Oate . tnspectors Daily Report No.: Arrivai Time - IPE Project No.: Weatner . j page Ro.. or _ ~C~ 5 ~ . . Cllent Lo al Representat~vel phone number ~ r rC,e~ ~ (a 6 O~- Z 3 Z3 General Contractor . e sen v p one number Subcontractor . IPE P Ject Manag r/ phone n mber Q Y1 ~ J~~ r' ~ ~ tPE Field Representattve Manpower & Equ ment Used Comments: ~ ' (Worit Completed Apparently 4V-J:f. l % (,A.P^r C~f perSpecificatlons Problems and thelr Solutlons) y . 4sl _P ~ ~ ~ At lg:~ ~ P` Ja M. t~ , ec; • A~l ~Y`~ .I,~ ~ S ~ /r.. Nl~ ' L/ ~ ~ . ~ ~Q (~Z~ ~ / ,~/i !'~t°~ c~ ~ r'~. ~c....°~/t G~. • ~i~G'- ct ~ ~ ~2 ~ ~ ~~F ~ ~~~1• r~ C ~ ' A /44 WA: e /Au tow 4~ 7'~k-111~e r . . r . . . . IPE FIELO REPRESENT E • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . , - This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer a!or'IPE proJect manager. ~ Date Date IP ~CON~tRUCTiON ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER . , Corresponding Deficiency Report No: • . ~ , ,.:1: r.•: f^ - - . .~c, . _ . ..._...'-'...'--..~cvn.~.....~......,.c.ra.: . . . {NLAND ~ DAtLY FIELD REP~~~C PACIFIC 1r4:ENGINEER.IN0* ~ . T. . , . inspector"s Oally Report No.: ~ Date . / . ~ 10L a e f~o. ot_ ; . IPE ProJect No. ~ . P*^ Comments. . . . . ~ (Work Completed Apparently perSpectficattons roblems .~'G~' ~ ~~F'-- . and their Soluttans) G<- X ~ j`,~,~~~ ?r ir 17 a,~. . .,~'~ls~~` ~ . . • . J • t ` ~ T ~ ~ • y _ F~ „e~ e~ /I ' ~'R/~•;~ Q;~.4~~- 1~`. ~V ~r ~ z~ ,7Zr) ~10 _ ~ . . . . ~ .S~'Q..°_ /~:111 ~•~.~~~dc f ~ ~ ee / US' ~t-'~• - ~ Lr..~ ~'..~t...t ~ ~ . 74-- . ~ . . Non-Conforming Items: (ProJector Standarc! Specfflcat]cn Observed ConsUuctton Is [n ~ . Non-Compltance with) ~ . . ~ , . ~ ~ lPE . IPE F,a{d Rep IPE CE PM Contractor s Rep t~r ~ 1 V ` . ~ ~ 6 ~ , 4 ? " 5 9 ~ ~gp.7~~ . ~ ~ ` ~ , i . I ~,f`,`~ H ~ MK ~ / ii~ ~ ~ a~~ ~ . ~ ~ r. , ~ ~ ~ p ► \ ~l,~cj ~ . t 1 i 2,' 1 ~ . ~ ~ , . 12 Rp,~S A ~ , 13 . ~ ~ w 1~~ ~1 ~~g•~ ~ ~ / . I./ / ~ . . / ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1,6'tig•6 N ' ~ z ~ 19 . ~ ~i ~G ~ . , ~ ~ ~ M~ ~ 3 \ ~ ~ " A g1 ~~18,5 N ' G'~ ~,'V~ , , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ov~ ~ \ 4 \ ~ ~ ~ 'Y~ . . 1 . ~ti ` . . ~ ` , ^ 5 . 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ` 6 ~ ~~z. ~1~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ , , 6 ,~2.~1 ~ ~ / r~~ ~ / M~ ~ ~ ' i~ \ ~ ~i ~'i ~ ` , ~ . 7 ~ ` ~ M , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9~.5~~8.2 N ~ , ~ / , ~ ~ µ r 1 \ / h - 18~t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~~8•~ N µH ~R ' ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~~ ~g ~ ~ / ~ r r 21 " 92•a1'a'~ N~~ I ~ , ~ ~ 9 ► ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 1. . ~ ~ , a ~ ~ ~ MH 17 ~ ~paN ~ ~ \ ~ 1 EXN~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tR ~ ~ ~g ~g ~ \ ~ y 16 I ~ 7 ~ ~ H ~ `p ~ 1.~01~~'3 " 1 ~ ~ 3 ~ . „ . ~ ~ 151 ~ ~ A~ . 19 . j ~ R ~ R~RWA~ ~ .9 N 5 ? ti ~ ~gp.8~~~ ~ ~~g2.0~~ ~ ~ 7S ~ ~ \ 1 ~ I. , ,,C I ~ ~ ~H ~'1?,1 N . 6 ~ ~1 ~ " ,E 5 ~ ~ ~7•6 N ~ ~ 1 17~3 N ~9~'~~ ~ ~g9.~~ ~ ~ ' _ . ► 8 J ( ~5 ~ , q. f~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ p~ 1 . ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~.9 ~ ~ ~ ~ , 3 a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i Z - 16 ~ 20 ~ ~ 5 ~ 2 ~ ~ . .0 1~°•° N . , 6~ N ~ ~ . 10 ~ ~gQ,6~~ ~ / ~ ~92,4 j16,3 ~ ~ ~H 7~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ _ 1 1 . R ~ M ~v ~ _ . ~ 2. . ~ l , 2 , 5 1 ~ ~ . 1 . 19~,~~ ti 6 ~ ~ Q~ . 13 - f ~ ~ 6 . ~ r ' MN ~g - ,~RA~'~ . , 1 . , ~ . . _ . . ~5 , 6g N ~ , , , ~ . . - v~ . . ~ ~ / ~ M~55~~~ ~ - ; ~ o ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~a~.~ ~ . , u . y 5 t INLAND , - PACIFIC : . DAILY FIELD REPO, , ENGIjVEERI(NG Oate o/ . Inspeatoes Oaily Report No.: Q- 47 _ ~ Arrival Time tPE ProJect No.: Xd"70 9oeaTher i-age No.. _ or ~ . . Cllent Lo I =Represe~;atlve!pho e number ea,c . : ~G ~ a h't ( Yd Y~-f Z ~ Genecal Contractor ~ ep en v p e number Subcontractor IPE P ect Manager/ hone nuryaper (17~/' s ,~i¢-,~t ~ y~i IPE Field Representat(ver~ Ma ower & E ui mentUsed ~ ~ c .~,►A~,:,~'Y e:~~ r~..,U-r} ~ ' ~ A4 ; 0a Comments: - / ;\(Woric Completed Apparently r.L (T1CJ O ~_JperSpecifications Problems and their Soluttons) /l~j S~ G,~ a tT,~.,,,. <,~i ~:1~/ j~i y J lLJc~~ l' --°,,P~ ~ I1. o 1,4-.j q.3 1) t f c= l. ~ • O 409tZcd ~ ~ ~ //d;~~,~ . --Z~.~~~ ~ - / ~...T &I j~J Or 0A., tA_ wj ~~!•..CA ,i~G~!i'~ ~ ~ l:i ~ . ' r ~ 04, r~ C P ~ . . ~ _.w- IPE F1EL0 REPRESENT • CO, NTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . . , This document and referenced eddenda are to be consfdered preliminary untll reveiwed and signed by the IPE constxvction engineer andlor*IPE project manager. • ~ Date , Oate ~ ' .lL ~ - •~ti-~~~ ~ - I CO T UCTION ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT (VIANAGER 0 - Corresponding Defictency Report No: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , . ...............v.~vr r.-r-r---.........a..:.r~,ve+c_. . . . . ~ -.-•-'-•r_'-'... 7 INLAND ~ DAILY FIELD RERR"~~C PACIFIC ~ t'"eM:ENG1NEERIN0-- lnspectoes Daily Report No.: Oate 6 iPE ProJect.No. Page nro. . ot ~~L . . . , Comments: . ~ ~ ~~'I~ ~ ~t,/~• ~ ~ _ ~ (Worfc Completed Apparentty ~ / _ ~ • ~ erSpecffcaUons robiems ~~'.r"'t and thelr Solutton ~ la Vt.-.< r lC,~ w4 i..~! . K2 el or) '7~ W C) L4,,, ~ / L/ r-o "kj, ~ rl - .j . . ~ Non•Conforming IEems: (Project or Standarci Specificadon . . . , Observed Constrvctlon is In Non-Comptiance with) ~ - IPE F,atd Rep , IPE CE IPE PM - Contractor's Rep • -~'r e._ , _ tNLAND _ PACtFIC : 7 ZE DAtLY FIELD REPOI ENGiNEERING : ` . . . . . . . Date L - //7 - Inspectoi's Oalty Report No. ~ ~ . f~ ArNval Time A~ IPE ProJect No.: - 70 , Wea1her . page i Io.. ot . Client Lo I Representatlvel hone number ~ dl r'G~ ZO (t ~ 4-4' Z3Z3 . General Contractor u • Zite ep sen v ~ one numaer : - . Subcontcactor ~ IPE Prot Manager! one numbe1 / 1PE F1eld Re resentative p ' i e! ~ ~ r~ Man ower & Equipment*Used ~~C~"- ~ . ' / ' _ . : 5"~./'~. ~ Comments: (WoritCompletedAppar+ently f--erSpecfftcatJons; roblems ~id their SolutJons .~..~.~/s ~ f-~ sc_~ P~ S. ~ Avole- el' ols . re- . ~ ~L✓Ae ZX 0 IA YGc.~' .p,o^ ,CI 4 Cr S 4e ~ <l ~ ?rje,1-4- /f .r . A+✓~~~I /~~,~'9 _ ~ • • '0000 ■ !PE FIELD REPRESENT IVE • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . , . This document and referenced addenda are to be constdered preliminary unt11 reveiwed and signed by the IPE construcUon engineer andlor*lPE proJect r.nanager. - , / Date Oate ~ . . . !I f/~ . ~ IP COI~,&RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVfANAGER 6~ - - - Corresponding Deficiency Report No: - ' . . _....vt..~ .._.~.....~....:..:.r_: - _ . ..K'. . . . - INLAND : PACIFIC DAfLY FIELD REP~" Tri., ENGINEE.IN.G.- . , tnspector's Oaily Report No.: Tn Date ~ . IPE Project No. : i'age tYo. _ -ot---~- ~ 0- Comments: . ~ - ~ ork Compteted Appar+entiy ~ ~ . (W perSpecfticatlons,Problems ~/~,r . and thelr Solutlons) ~ Z ` . Q ~ - ~ 7~ ~ ~ ~S' ~ ~ ic ;011~a A . , _ . . - • ~ ~ Q c ro 14.~~~ ' ~S ~ ~ 00 . Non-Conforming Items: (Project or Standani Speciflcatton _ . . ' , Observed Constructlon is In Ncn-Compliance with) ~ . . ' . ~ ^ . . t. iPE Fie{d Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep i. / ~ r` \ / ~ T I ^ ~ 1 (2o) ~ 000 ~ ~ ~ t ` ^ ` \ .i ~ G~ ~ ~ / ~1 ~ ~ \ ~19C (.19),, . ' 1-11 / i ~ t 4 V..~ . lool 1000'' EXI°5T • MH 12' / t / ~ TRACT ~EX1ST • MH~~ ~ 1 r~ r -r - ~ (RIVERWAI" 13 7 6 fJ~ ~ 41 _ ~ ~ 1 ~ f.~ 1 20 ~ EXIsT • µy-`3- - - I 1 ST ADDN • ..F ~ l (RMERWAI.K ~ - 1 MH 7A - ~ ~ ► ► ~ ~ g 9 ~ , , r ~ 18g.9 j17.4 ~D(t 16.9 N r- r 190.6/ 1 (17 r~ u I A 7 ~t I • ~ 1~ / a ~ 7 1 8 8.9/16.7 N ` fi ~ M K N . 4 .MH 7B ' . - EX1 ST' MH ,r - . ~ . .R. ; RwALK 1 ST A~aN hZ ~ ~ • _ ~ 15 ~ I ~ . ~ ; . . ~ _ _ . r19N . ~ f ' • ~ . ~ ` V ~ • r- _ ~ ~ ' MtSSION ..~~.i~ ".n'r . • . r H 14 ~ • _ EX1ST• M RIVERWAI-K ~ ST ADDN.) ~ . , Y . ~ y. t~.... ~ • " _ - ~lIII ~--~ta+~r••r~._ 7 INLAND _ . ~ PACIFIC DAlLY FIELD REPOi ~ , . h ENGl~1EERING • ~ ~ , . . . . . . . - . - . . Oate inspectoc's Oaily Report No.:',5 Atrlval Ttme ~ IPE Project No.: . ~ ~~~-~~-r ~ . ~ WeaUner . ~ ~ i-oage ivo.. or 3 . Client W)"~' Local Repres ntativel hone number I } ~ r ~ ~ rr General Contract~or S~~:ptbsen v ~ one num~ . Subcontractor . ~ I-PE Project Manager/ phone num er IPE Fleld Representative Man wer & Equip nt Used ,~r ztf-' D i / ~~~w6~ r ~ ( ( - C'xO ` I ~ ~ '~0 L. Vf f r ~T I ~t - ~~1,t;~fl ~ • ~ ~.E~'p~,. (.~f~ Comments. ~ 76 t3 irOoV (Work Completed Apparently oe ° -1rSpecittcations Probiems I,IV /N AIP ~ld theJr Solutions ~ ; ~ ~ ) I ~ ^~G~Ae-p 1,~.,i~P ~ ~ ~i' ♦.,P~ ~"~e . ~",x ~ ~ v ~i' ~ ~d~i ~ ~ ~ .~`,~~t_. : ~F~~G'~' - ~r~ f ~-1 _ ~3 l~~ 1 1'~ ~ Gt~-J ~ - . ~ ~ ~ ~ i~ 1 l~t~! ~ / C~/ ~ ~L~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ✓':~t~.1. / I~ ~ ~ ~ /,Lp h 67 ~ .S • ' +""t~'~~' • ?~4'..~ ~ .f'~ .1t`'f y a !/l 5 6 0 ~ ~ ~ 7",44, je"1 ? j2,e G~ 1!5 . h ~.flc~Aa.// d!^ 47 f.' lo a ~r~ . .i • . . . ~ IPE FIELO REPRESENT • ~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . , , . Thts document and referenced addenda are to be considered prellminary until reveiwed and signed by the iPE constructto engineer andlor-lPE project manager. Oate ~ Date ~1V'(/ ~ ~ ~ i~~ ~f- ~ • IP tON6TRUCTION ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT 11AANAGER Corresponding Defciency Report No: ~ • ~ . ..-.~..'r.:r-~-. _ , . •h!~. . . ~-tr""' ' INLAND PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REP~t~' ~ r14:ENGINEERIN.G ~ ~ Date , - ~ ~ ~ Inspectot's Daily Report No.: ~ IPE ProJect No. 1'age Ro. ~ ot. ~ - bC/~~ ~ ~ - Comments: (Work Completed Apparently L~ per Spectficatlons,Problems ~Gt (J?. T~ k P dr-, and thelrSolutlons) 40- o 14 5 fa-~~1~ ~ ~ i-c / C /'-e uJ /v r 4~A,_r {ZI o 6.c,-/~ ~..c., • . ` ~ . c~- .5~, e~~ e' so c~ G~ (~lfN41. ke- 1'I eCeJird US. 4 %lv-p- L^J1C_J_r_ ~ a "90 . Non-Conforming items: ~ ~ • ~ ~ (PmJect or StandaM Specfficatlon Observed Constructton ts in Non-Compltance with) {PE F,ald Rep . IPE CE IPE PM • Contractor's Rep 1g1 6j18~5 N \(N; C e~ 0e\ ~i ' ~ r 30 F ~ ~ 0 . ~ ~ . ~ 1 - - . 1 - ~ 6 N ~t . ~ ~ ~ ~ 192•~~ ~ $.0 , MN 73 IN. ~ . N f ~g~ .9/ N►H ~ ~ g z~ tA 20 . 12 1 19 . . . lc3A.ro/A7 -1 .N N S 15 92 0~i-7.1 ~ j 7 / 1. . ~ . ` ~ . _ j ~ .7 ~ MH ~E 5 04 7 192.4I17,1 N 10 ~ ~ro Za 0.0 /1O.0 15 192•,,j16•3 -7 f 3 2 , - ~ 2*2 14 . ~ .,r . 1 ~ " • R,A~~ , . _ . ~ . • . - ~vE ~ - ~ INLAND PACIFIC - - ,-A; OAtLY FtELD REPOF : ENGINEERlNG . . . ~ " up a - ~ . Oate inspectoYs Daity Report No.: ~ t- Arrival Time IPE Project No... ~ . 'Weatner - page iqo.. o vel hone number Client ! Lo i Repres ntatt p _ ~ t i~,~. ~ ~e~ psen "five/ pr one number General Contractor 4 Subcontractor . • . !PE roJect Manag rl phone num er CR, ay &A~1 iPE Fietd Representative -JEi 4,,u Ilo~~ . Manp wer & Equipment'Used ~ /~,lf- 1'Z A (fe,re U Comments: ~ O (WorlcCompleted ApparenUy _ jd~' e perSpecificatlons Probiems 'aad theic Solutlons) `.9 /1'~•~-c. ~7 a ~ r~e _ -i,~~ e~~l ~I/a~► ~ ~ . f 7/ Ad A ~ ~ / ~ ~/T /f ''~~f I~~i • . ~ .~".t .~fi ~ ~ /1•~C ~ / T'G~- ~ -~~n~~%+~ . , co,1'L. ~ - ' ~►~4 ~-r., ~ . - . ~ • IPE FIELD REPRESENT VE - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . . - - This iiflcument and"refenenced addenda are to be considered pretiminary until reveiwed and signed by the fPE construction engineer andlor,IPE project manager. • ~ ; Date Oate ' ~ . )PC ONR CTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER . . i - . t-,-~ --spondin9 DefciencY Report No: . . ...."""'...r.•1..~ ( 'r INLANo Ile.: PACIFtC DAI LY FI ELD REP.01' ~ ENGINEERtN.G- Inspector's Oaily Report No.: Oate ~ iPE Project No. ~.~d . (:72 - , . Comments: (Woric Compteted Appareatiy zejo per SpectfiaaUons,Probtems tooti - 1%-Isz4kl and thetr Solutlons) CO eo &,4~ v • ~ ~ ~ rs_ . . C-t A s 1~ . 4P cc10 ~k: or~r ~ ~ Non-Conforming items: (ProJect or Standard Speciiicattcn . . , ~ Observed Constructlon is [n ~ Non-Compliance with) J ~ IPE Fieid Rep IPE CE IPE PM ~ Contractor's Rep ?0 ` 5 , 6 r . . . :~n 6 3 4 g24~~$.0 ► 7 3 / ~I 5 18,2 N ' - ~194• ~ M~ - MK ~ ? / 19i .9/ MN 1 . 9 N 21 ~ - .\.\N - ~41,1 ~ , 8 l MH 1 ApD • ` 1 .3 N' 1g1.6~1~ 13 ~ 19~.8 j 1? .9 N 15 _ ~ 1 ~ ~g2.o1 f~ 6 I 7E ~j - . 19~,Of ~-7•6 N j*4 - . 192•~'~~~~ g 1 _ g ~ 17 t - 1 7A ~ Zo - ;O,p ; ~ . 3 192•4l-16,3 _N i 190.6 f 16.3 N . 14 . - _ ' ! ~ ~ ~ ~ AN E~vE ~ - INLAND . . rem PACIFIC DAILY FlELO REPOF ENGINEE RlNG ~ P ' ~ C,. . . . . . . Date ~ - Inspectoes Daity Report No.i IPE ProJect No.. Arrival Time . ~~a70 ~ / S~ ~ . ~ . . Q9 ather . . page i~o.. . ot 1 Cltent Loaal Reprreseritativet phone number . . , General Contractor Mre-Represen vf~V p one number Subcontractor . = . tPE Project Manager/ phone numbe B IPE Field Representattve Man ower & Equl ment'Used 7 4 ~Q Comments: r 4 Lfxj (WoricCompletedAppanenUy OI'? /t perSpecificatlonsProbtems • thelr Solutlons) q ~''LL cl 1,1 Pr , l,c~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ,P U ) / r.~~ ~ . . . ~ ' 410 ~ A~C- ~ ~ . ~ Za,,A-1 . . IPE FIELO REPRESENTATIV CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . . --Uts-document and ceferenaed addenda are to be constdered pneliminary untii reveiwed and slgned by the IPE construction engineer andlor-IPE project manager. • _ ~ Date j ' Date \ {P CON RUCTION ENGlNEER lPE PROJECT t1AANAGE . a \ . rresponding Deficlency Report No: . ~-"W INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REMO7' ~ - ENG{NEEftIN.G - ~ ~ . . . ~ . . . . Date Inspector's Oaily Report No.: ipage tio. . ~ o%'-- IPE ProJect No. Z r;0- Comments: (Woric Completed ApparenU ~ peFSpecfficaUons,Problems ,~j,e ~.r~. and theirSoluttons) - ~ 9 10,'a.lv a~ . . . ~ ~~~I 1 ~'L 9 ~ • rz*z-/-e. PX I zf/l~• ~1. Q,-1~~•~ •J - . S e e.id /0 1-b i~ r-A- PlP ~ ~ l~ ~ Ve a er.ll7`~'/~ ~ ~ ~_f` K. .~5•/ / "C.~aL~/~ !~I + ~~V ~ C~,~.~~~~.~ ~ ~ • ~ . a i~~ f . _ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,e'~ ~ ~ ~ 3 1,4 i/f ~ ~s • ~ ~ l~~L~ ~ ~ ~.~~c~~~.~ ~i.Cc.~r~ 4,o ~r~t ,CV t :0e, W ~ • ~ Non•Conforming Iterrts: ~ ~ • ~ ~ • (ProJector StandardSpecFiiaation ~ ' Observed Construction is in Non-Compltancewith) ~ ~ • ~ . . , ~ ~ . ' IPE Field Rep~ IPE CE iPE PM Contractor's Rep ti9~ g~~$.5 N • ~ \ ~ • 3 ~ . - Ag2 _ \ t2, j Ag1.9/18.3 MH 7~ ~ ~ 192•oiAa•' ~ yr" ~ . . ~ ~ 1 MN 1~, A9ID • ~ 7 6 N 1-7.3 ~,,~K~~~ , 9 ti • 14 . ~ N A7.g ~ , - ~ 1~•1 N ` 1 co 7E ~J . , 17,6 N ~ . 1 19 ~ 14 5 . Zp tV N ~ ~u~ ~ ~ 0•0 c 2 ~ 15 192,4/1 g.3 7 70 . N . .~l ~ t 190•6/A6'3 ~ 14 13 ' . . 1 : ~ - . . . + 1 ~ ~ Y • ~ ~ ~~ss~~ ~ INLAND - - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPOF ~ , . ENGtNEERING . . ~ AU. 6- 7 - - Oate ~ Inspectoes Oaily Report No.: Arrtvai Time . . IPE ProJect No.: _ ' y6C) - . WeaUher ~age iyo.. • or ~ - . Cltent Loaal Represer► tlve! hone number Ov~. ~ G ~Ya ~?.-GS • . g 1 rG~ 2Q~o Z3?~3 Generaf Contractor - ~ e e s e n v ~ one number U P ~ _ _ . . Subcontractor . IPE ProJe t Managerl phone number . (!5~A IPE Field Representative ~ • ~ • • . Ma wer & Equi ment'Used e Fi/wft -7 L~ ~D~ Comments: (WoritCompfetedApparently perSpecffications Pnobtems • ~ , and thelr Sotutions) / id16-1 •lrC• ~ . ; ~ C,r,~" ,~',►~r. ~ ~ r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .S" ~ . ~ f~~ t~ ~i~.::~? ~,,~~l s-t. ~f,cJ ~ ~r. ,f~ ~~vr C o✓'~`~.s [ / ~ ~ ~f J ~ iy? l~! t°rl- /rl,1 ! / 1F7 IY ! ~ / Al ..$+7'4. ! /a. . r ~ 10~4. t=t /W"Fll11~ ~la p,. 44V.4-x a . 3. e.) 4..J i t,';'x rot, 4-1.//~ 9-"/ Vz, ~ ~ goLoJ SQ~ 7% ~ MEN IPE FI ELD TAT E - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . , . 4-bis-document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary unt11 reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructlon engin~er and! r*IPE proJect manager. • Date ~ oate , , . p r tu~_ c STRUCTION ENGINEER , IPE PROJECT 11AANAGER . . ~n ~ . . vvrresponding Oeficiency Report No: ~ ' r1C:tNG1NEERIN.G-- Date tNLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD RER~- Inspectors Oaily Report No.: IPE ProJect No. ` Page No. ~ 0%3 - ~~07a Comments: . ~~f~ ~ -~t.~ C,Q (Work ComPleted areL~~~~ APP nUY ~ perSpecfflcatlons,Problems ` ~ l~L,, A. • • and theic SolutJons) • ~ i~2~ W4 e:c e,,; -1► 0,1A S , . . ~..l~ ~ ~ . AAa C.e-h.. w/4k A9Ko VCT, re6/9^.54~ n z ; , U -u u ' . / ~ t -f-A t4r. -o n t° le L41"ou jclE? o- i _olc.°,-,- - ohGt.-~ ~ ~ . , 60~1 6 174-44 1'~~ ~ ~ . 7 . 14 & .~.~.~d . -;x- Non-Conforming Items: - ~ • ~ (ProJecior Standani Specfflcatlon Obserired Construction ts tn Non-Comptlanca with) . ~ _ . • . . IPE 174Id Rep IPE CE ~ IPE PM ~ Contracto"r's Rep . t I tv-7 g g 1. 6 j 1 S• 5~ v:~jr' { 'oc F; gt~ 3of 3 ~ A\ ",IY9v ~ 30 1 . 2 . .7 3 q. ~ . N1H 7J 6 ~ 1924/ 18' •0 N 192. - ~ - 7 $ MH M~ M,H 7 M ~ 19~.9118.3 N ~N 7R i . ~ 10 8., N ~ 192-011 ~ - 1 1 . 12 ~ r 19 18 ~ 16 . ~ 17 - ~ .191•6/17.3 N 14 7 ~ . 192.1~~•~ ~ . `C . 1. ~7.6N ~C 5 . 192.4/17,~ N S 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ fio 17php 19 ~ Ita cl . , i t.18 i ~to► ~ 10 - zo /,o.o ~ r„ _ 2 _ . . . . . . i - 1c-'J 192.4/16.3_0 . , . `NIH 70 . ~ IiVLAND - ' PACIFIC WORK OR MATERIALS ENGINEERING DEFICIENCY*REPORT NO. Date 36 ~ 1~' Project Name 77-.4 Pro1'ect No. ~~O 70'/ - P~'r.,~YC~ pi~-IG~ Fi~r•p I~~P'l, l~o. ~ NATURE OF OEFICIENCY - !~1 S~ t'° ~ ;'°✓r JP /~.S ~rr i ,1~~~J1-~ c~ ~ d.. t le, le !'-t°IOC-7.d~d L.~i SQ_~ ~/l~{i► 74, ~r ZVY Zf 71- -1 a'- ~ (c'C,7' >.r~/ r1 ` i. ~ - ~ . j, ~ / ~ - • • 47 r a.- r ~ .J~~ 7'C ~ C1 L-t - .C? ! ~h ~ v (~C./ ~1 ~Z~I ~'1 t'~i'') ~1 .•'-V / Ci_ ~ f..~ ,,,`9 ! ,~c'' ~':r ~ 7~ .~l~ mp S o! GI ~''r WP s ~~7'~'~~ • L~t r,c.vt,~► ~ ~L. / / ✓ ~ r- 1 . ~ s'~1 ~ ~ c.~~• ~ ~ 401 / J~, i L Deliverec0 To Contractor's Representative ,~l~f~.~~• .•t=~ r..~ .~~~,,~i'~ I ~'~b . ~ ~ at B y ' DESCRIPTION OF REMEOIAL ACTION r'Qficiency Report Released 6y . at . Date Reviewed By Date " -VOINLAND . PACIFIC OAILY FIELD REPtJF ENGttVEERJNG ~ , . . . . . . . . . ^ Date Inspectoles Oatty Report No.s Arcival Time j I P E P roj e c t N o.: 7~670 r/ . PPealher i-age ivo., ot . Client - ( - - L t Repnesentativel hone number G~C ~ G Y~d~G ~`t GS . ~ i~ ► rt•G~- 2 D(o 44- Z 3 2-3 - ~ . . Genecal Contractar 'SIWRe gtesen v N one num er Subcontractor • IPE Pro ect Managerl phone nu ber/ IPE FIeld Representatlve • - t~ la~~~ ~ ~cl~~ ' , Manpower & Equipment'Used ~P ' ~ ~~r~~~J' PI°t , GR J I y~vT • p ~ IG.. ~ ~ L~,~"~ Ae e ? ~d C' 61~" '•a~ ~ o~ ,D y/"1 r>~b / Gr ~ , . Comments: (WocicCcmpleted A,pparentfy perSpecificatlons Probiems • and thelr Solutions) ~ \ • r ~ ~ 1 ~ • n. . ) (i /C L°~~ &-ZV70 "A . . ~ , ~ ~ ~ r~ut- ,vt.~.,.~' a- ~ ,.,000/1, %A^ P ♦ ~ -t ! ~ ~ ~p : rd T' / f~ LP li1 G I/✓o ~ .r . IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIV"~E:~ • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . , . This document and referenced addenda are to be constdered preliminary untll reveiwed and signed by the fPE construction engineer apd~or,IPE project manager. • f Date Oate ♦ ~ . ' IP ON ~ Rl~CT10N ENGtNEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER . b .&;,.~asPondin9 OefciencY Report No: ~ INLAND PACtFiC ~ DAILY FIELD RENTUT ENGINEERIN.G - . . Oate Inspector's Oatly Report No.: IPE Project No. ~ 2 J ~ '~'age ilo. - o~-- ~ ~ - ~ ~ Comments: . ✓-,g e e/'~n '.1 ~ ~ ~ . . (Work Completed Apparently perSpecff(cattons,Problems and thetrSoluttons) C~ t/ ~t ~ . ~r/~~~•~ - ,~r~ ~I " ~ . ~ Non•Conforming Iterns: (Projector Standard Specfficatlon Observed Construction is in ~ ~ • , Non-Compltance with) • • • . • . . IPE Field Rep IPE CE IPE PM " Contractor's Rep r ~d,, r ( dfzzP~ ~ J~► ~{~,,e'~o- ~ ~ ~ ~3 1 ~ ~ ; ~ . ~ z 3 7 1 ~ 6 3 4 5. 4~ ~ a.o N ~ 92' MH 7 ~ - M~, MK 7 M ~ - - 191.91 1g,3 MN *7 R t g ~ ~ ~g2.o/~e•' N ~ ~ , . ` 2~ ~ 12 , ~ . $ 1 Nl i r N14 13 W 7 A5 a,t~ ~ ~S e 1 ~ ? ~ 5 ~ / 7 N 17.1 .0~1-7'6 N 04 i92'4/ 191 i 6 4 ! i 17 r r 5 )10 5 3 ' ~ . l~°• ~ 2 _ : 10.0 ~ . . . 70 15 192,4j0•3 7f ~ M . 1 90.6 /16•3 . 14 -~Rp~CT _ 13 ' - - - , ~ ~ r uE July 31, 1996 ~ Spokane County Engineers Office 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260-0170 Attn: Bili Johns, P.E. - Re: Sanitary Sewer Inspection - Dear Bill, After several conversations with Bruce Rawls and Terry Lightfoot, I have been informed the County Inspection Department will be inspecting sanitary sewer installation within plats approved under the newly adopted County Standards. On any new projects, the inspection will be decided oR a case by case basis by Jim Legat. Therefore, at this time we will stop all sanitary sewer inspections at Riverwalk 7th Addition, as well as Blackhawk Northwest. Riverwalk 4th and 5th Additions are scheduled to begin sanitary sewer installation tomorrow August 1, 1996. At this time we will schedule an inspector to review the work . -being performed,-as Jim Legat is out of town until Tuesday August 6, 1996. ~ As you can see this has become a scheduling and billing problem for us. We have tried to gear up and have staff on hand to perform inspections in a timely manner. When will there be consistency in the inspection policy? If a project is reviewed and accepted under the new standards, shouldn't it be inspected by the private industry as well? It is very difficult for us to plan ahead and-have staff available for inspections if the decision of responsibility for inspection is decided on a case by case basis. Your prompt attention to this issue would be greatly appreciated. I look forward to hearing from you. If you have any questions or comments concerning.this issue, please feel free to call me any time. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Bruce A. Howard Project Engineer cc: Bruce Rawls, Jim Legat, Terry Lightfoot ~ e • INLAND PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ENG I N EER I N G_ --7._ a . • . • Oate g/ Inspector's Daily Report Na : 1 r . Arrival Time IPE Project No.: Weather rage No. oir Client ' Loc rMt Representative/ phone number et Zo 6 f a ~1~3Z3 General Contractor • ~e 2ep9senta v p one number Subcontractor IPE Pro'ect Man~~ er/ phone number IPE Field Representative 4-4?0-r,a Manpower & Equipment Used • Comments: (Woric Completed Apparently OA/ 4t?;5 74D 2,006kJ ~ ~~~r Qy~n/% 170S . perSpecifications Problems eir Solutions) 120 / ; 9t~ ) , 0-647,c_! a,c/ 4>~LX.! Zr[~ 1PE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer r d/or IPE project manager. ~ Date Date ~ C06ST UCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: ~ 7 INLAND - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date ~ Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No. . Page No. ot Comments: &aTVCX~Al &MR6 P,7 V D ?a /S GW TI/A/15p 1ti/ (Wortc Ccmpleted Apparently - per Specifications,Problems yj,5u,p~~ ~ A-,-r#+Z4k1M and their Solutions) ~rv~ G~S ~~o /2~L?/~l ~~D ✓r~il l~lc~r~U~. ~ D~ ~'VIQ'n oA-/ . ~ za. l Tlte . . rf7- VY97 GA-W W__ TKlC-7 <AIV71~ ik/r)164-7-0 / 13 pezp f =PW64__L 0 1zvft~7)L, 9:?1s r TZ> VJJ4?77- oxl Non-Conforming Items: . (Project or Standarcl Specification - Observed Construction is ln ' Non-Compifance with) IPE FiQId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 15 / ~~TE ~ 4 7 . , 0 07 ~ 13 Jl SPOk ~ ol . 20 8 x I~I I The Sp 6 having 6 6" GATE 8" GATE VALVE . 9 9 \ i T , r / IRE HYDRAN 5 AkANT ASSEM6LY FIRE HYDRANT IE 5 O T A SEMBLI( )10 17 18 ~ ASSEMBLY ~ ~ 19 4 t4 wl ~ ~ 11 0/ 16 i !3 ~ 5 20 3 Q U N P LATT m ~ 12 0 2 10~ 2" FLUSHING } P01NT ,~5 21 2 0'~ 1YPICAL WATER SERVICE 4 SEE DETAIL, SHT, 2 8" END CAP ~ / ~ 13 7 Nc ~ ~ . 14 22 Tut"N" 1 TRACT ~ C` I oi[TRACT„ B ~ GATE V -c- - - _ GATE VALYE_ 21WM - - P_ CAUT 0 NI! ! ! D „ „ TAP BY RIG. CONDUIT C.M.P. IRRIG. CoNDU~ 2 1 x 8CON50LIDATED IRRIGATION DIST., 21 x 8° TAP BY TO SE PAID FOR BY DEVELOPER CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DIST., . g I TO BE PAID FOR BY DE/ELOPER 1Az),c%1rGT Ja kivT &PKA/Ce-rio,k/ IVa r" CCv~►►'~ ~ A,~"~ &vwt pu~~ ~Q~ VER.uJ~ ~K- 1~I~N~ V~1►~S~VIc~ rKl~,~t,Lc.~ T~ ~I t+k~SN~.~~D o>J rs,~rc~`'~►ti.l C QC> 7 INLAND - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING. ~ . . . Date Inspector's Daily Report No:: ~ v~ ~ l Arrival Time ' IPE Project No.: 2 ~ 3 - ~~a?a - t Weather ' rage No. oir 3 Client Local Represenf.ative/ phone number ~iA-Gt F, G p~Lo P~rZ~( G~ C Q/2'C'.f~ ZDCo ~~4 Z3~3 - General Contractor ' i e epresen ve p ne umber o S. g ~ Subcontractor IPE Project Managerl pfione numbef ~i?•~c ~v~-r2-0 ¢5g 6 54~3 IPE Field Representative ' a Manpower & Equipment Used 1110-r lN~l~l70 ~~~0 - Comments: (Woric Completed Apparently W4!~ ~(L(L~ ~G~ Q'7~f s ►-~-E ~ 0 g S~~G 'f"df~ ~~-Tt~s ~ ~"~E perSpecifications Problems • ' " and thelr Solutions) 6k1q17A-je-y/ 5;(-5P/6-1a ~O 86 ~~ylG~~i~IT L9 y ~464~ ilf P6v 14A2 rvAc- ~ we ltt6--r wl7tf J im (pie r- I As TO -r74-6 //V Ov6-~5T~,a)xl. JItil G,45T r-AOAY 0! D Nb-r OAVS -f~g C' ~A6t-T Q oTTd'w T R~-~ /melqK a.c-~&Ip Srrvl P1,t~ B 26uC~ #-r /N AN67H6-4- FA'~~.-C-C se-5GrtoW ~'IV0 sT~t Q B~-~ SC-G-T 67/s 6-r- W-6 rsu-r o-r- 1T A-r -rpfe Tmc- ar- csult i1s1T w~5-- \ , / J~~r" ]J • \ ~I E u sL0 REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE Th1s do ment and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. ' Date . Oate irl~/'~ 1' y ~ , ~-ut~ !i ~ I.Ot COOTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT (IAANAGER ~P sponding Deficiency Report No: ' 7 INLAND I . ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ■ ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Oaily Report No.: IPE Proj.ect No. Page No. of ~ Comments: (Woiit Completed Apparentty per Specifications,Problems ~x Gr4=~yv ~j/G ,/~I~6 -s 6 G~f6iqS TaptrNA-rnl & and their Sotutions) • . ll! /f~ ~'rI-G(G7rtf/LE 406) r~►ieaur6-0 / N 46014!5--p JM ~~A-i~tlG-D ?u4-r 1 l-fi~ w6-c-tto /ytAt.G ~dw1v(nr-.,-r6w llYS ioE -rhiig w1T4 Xz- 56 G~l b~'Js pt ~P~ E~Lf B~Dt?~0 -riM6 C1~ (~ue- Vi 517 . -rM5 , ~~N pL~-~0 - ~o-~ Tbf~ ~ST,~-~! 0 Tbf~- ~ ~-~,~-0 ►3 ~~v ~c.~t~~r.~ ,~'(~l•~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 v~ ro -5 C) li~6- P1 &S ff-/4- VI/1l G 796- p6vvAly g,4o ga5ev ie Y ,4Na gleis:/v ~t sT w_ ~ 6C6'nl S721tG~'._ ot! sk-Ce., &r-r) or- CM s a y~ lffu e-). /)isT A-e- so sTi mrw a YAAvv /Yo kj12k( C ows-wcc~r4c>! or- A1A-r,5rR- 0(5T2tguT~ : ation ,4/V~ ~~S -51 70Le--, . lk~ : C6WTM--t~50 m. , B~ f~-~' nv(s • 1 3 A-s G ~ T" D C~Q' 6 v ~R-wiw --rw-r --rO oE rerm tYl 5 A)A!"r Ur 6644~6 AA7C C'~OW-rpfC;- 07:~' SPa C O 147064-ri 6s DGa'r dY ~a.(-1111I~6W6 1064 arl, ~ IPE FiQId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep HUV- V-96 FR1 lf:ll GIFFURli CONSULTANTS ING. 5095342925 P.01 Post-it° Fax Note 7671 ~Daw q ~pa~► 1 ~ - To J¢c~ ~~CS Q-.ti ~FromT2t~cSV- G~Irnu~n _ Q~ ~o~re • y5Fl - G~ 4~o vtio,~ r 53~i ~ 3(.70 ° Fax 1 YJ~ R"~d ySI Fax t 5arla5 . . ~ g/o47/sC. ~ . rosS S~.G~ i csn - of 19~. 0 1~ .(~3 . o~ 61 i dAY [ a.ne csn. jf\c+M i t 10,-,,. _ . ~ _ s~h'te~ 1Q~~. f : • . : . ,muwko~L ~ . . . 15 aPPrpc ,o•w' . ' . , . . ' ~ ~'n- . v ~ ' • The~`~ sav.wv bo+V\ 5idcS of- +Ae " . ~ ,mc~.r1na1 e ~D u.~ bbK 5 i de- haA bee r~~.~. 1tYi ~ 1c~ . e.xplc~~raa -1-0 ~rne. ~}-ha~- -E-1~.~ had,n' f be~.,,. ab le ~ ~ ~ - So *i4eY tA.-> eY C 9 0~ n~ ~ b~ ~ n5 i.,r\ ~ o. V\Ua vlece . "Q- Sa~% d jrb~\( wete.. r~+neJ . ~ Ct'c~ ~ . . . . A-),nQ- baek; scNme c.cme~ce~~~. 1CC c q: . ~ : piz. o.w)- a!U-w.e crn swmQ. vKOre- c_wtc,0,te doeS hot Se¢m c-oC ¢ c-i . . ' ' , ~ 91 &U7o`~ . ~ ~ . ~ , . AI o , 6- . . . 71NLAND PACIFIC . /f DAILY FIELD REPORT _ ENGINEERING. Date Inspectoes Datly Report No.: ! 5~ Arcival Time iPE Project No.: Weatner i-age ivo. or ~ . Cijent Local Represenfativel phone number General Contractor , STie-7epresen v p one number Subcontractor IPE Project ManageN phone number IPE Field Representative • Manpower & Equipment Used V~ ~ ►Jv ~~-~T"~?.+~~- . Comments: (Worlc Compteted Apparently . 1 .riAr-S"eciflcattons Problems ' leirSolutions) c~^ 4zi &Z/ 77-~7z, 0L.~ • G~L~~/St~ ~~toAD 609-e Zt/ ,>z, ~ e~/Sf- ~l g%.; - iPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construct~~n engineer a? lor E project manager. ~ Date ~ Date IP CON#TRU&ION ENGtNEER IPE PROJECT IVfANAGER . Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: 71NLAND PACIFIC OAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: IK ht 19 . . IPE Project No. Page No. oir ~ Comments: ,4 (Worlc Completed Apparently perSpecificatlons,Problems '5 . Lt--~ j,pA1q and their SoluUons) • Nlc> ~ . . !-~'~~.~~'r~~ ~r~ ~~~x. ~c~' ~ r.~~. ~►~..ma,~ 12n;~~ - " 000$ ~ G~i~ ~tv~l.L~~ci~, ~ ~;~t%G~i c~L C_r'1`~"✓ts ~i c.c7~~ ~ ~T . - i Ty tek,\ AS X Ttiy1"" 1 LAJ> (FE. A?_dJAJk11f::$.r1- ~.~tr r-f'r:r?, + 13C-X~.t77+z_ 45:::~~9r-~x4~-~x Non-Conforming Items: 1 . (Project or Standard Specificatlon Observed Construction is in . Non-Compliance with) • l~iq✓~ ~~5~ ~vi ~~~t- T~ ~ i~~; ~5~~ i~'"~ ~L~~1 ~x t4r~~~D ~ ~ ) ^ A ~•~J . IPE Field Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep . ~l ~ TNLA►ND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: sPOxAxE courrrY ENGnrEExs 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: nctober 4, 1996 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ M~ Work Authorization L&j Report M~ No. Copies Description -1 Dailv Inspection Reports #14 through'#38 ~ covering the neriod 8-21-96 throueh 9-28-96. PUIpOSe M XI Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval Signature & Return M~ Remarks Signed: . ~ CC: LUR Birch. Pacific Pronerties D:ITRNSM7'.PM5 - tin i N LAN D . ~ . ~ PACtFtC DAILY FtELD REPOF t ENGtNEER~NG _ • - ~ . ~ . _ . . . . - . . ~r/ ~ D$ts lnspectoYs Oatty Report No.: ~ t Time tPE ProJect No.: Arriva . . SO~~~/ ~ • VPea~her ~ ~ . . . page IRo.. ~ . oT zt Cttent j- Lai Repc~esentatIve! hne number L ~r4(j~-~~1 ,~cr~ ZD6 ~ Z3Z3 ~ General Contractoc ° Sftd~Represen v ~ one num er ~ GZL4v4_s Z Q r , Subcontractor/~ . ~ . IP'E Pro ect Managerl hone number ~ IPE Field Representa0ve . ~ . - Manpower & Equipment~Used 41~~--. c.e~' C vt srr ev =1. -~~ts ~ . ~u Comments: (Work Completed Apparenkty l~ 'e Q i 'v'~~ ~ ~~'t fS ~ f"~ ~ _/~1U <2/~.ex''61Q_ perSpecifications Problems ) anclthetrSolutlons) ~y r'~r ~ GG~'e'.~~ . e-Vl_11~l4 Gt-P r % ` j ~ t~ ~s' tr~✓~~ ! ~i..•~ , 1 l'C ~..I ~ : ~ / !'l ~s/'~....[ ~ hr~~ r ~ ~ ~''l~/ x ,'7 ~ ~ ° r.~ ,r r•' . + _ . . ~ - • ~ ' ~ '11Z ti'.''adk'~J 47 ° JGLt t(/t ~9•~ i ,P ) ,f~ /~i7 t / i Gt'~Pr'~ ~ • • _ , ~ . zo /~eil ~'/'d p2 c .1~ G ~'I ~ Jeefi 'vkq . / . ..-~.r ~~ti.i.!'.r~ ~~..~~J..sl' - ~ . .i • • ~ . ~ tPE FIELD REPRESENTAT-IfE ~ • ~ CONTRACT4R'S REPRESENTATIVE Thts document and referenced addenda are.to. be-considered preliminary untlt reveiwed and stgned by the IPE construction engin~e andlor~IPE proJect manager. • - Oate ~ . Oate 1 ~ . ' E CV STRUCTION ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT IVtANAGER t~sponding Deficlency Report No: - ' . 'M INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FtELQ RE ~ ENGINEER ifV.G = ~ ~ _ - . ~ . ' ~ ~ oate inspectoes Oa11y Report No.: 141- IPE ProJect No. wage uo. ~ ~ • r A-rj?o ( Comments: L.A te (WorkCompleted Apparentiy pBrSpectflcaUons,Probiems P.&,- and thelrSoluUons) !~'z9 ~ ~ ~ l'~~,5 !',~Sc ~ J~~~ ~t►^~P ~ .s.~ ~~L.-~- ~ ~-~'c1' ~ ~ ~ • ~ . Ai e, :l- d 0 rj' 4 H /.S ~r /,04 r, e? 4P0,4a,,,00q 9G) r Ule- re4,u 2 s-~°.~ ~ 4-f~a,--- ~.e.. C~,r4c,e 4:~,p ~ ~ r . ~v~ 0/~/ 6-61~3 o( t / 9 ~t'~R_ P~' ~ C~ JR~~ Z• Jh. S 0(rt~~ .~yY~'.:lS [;%~~~~~~f/` ~~~7 kAe rLe~Cve- O e -YGc('~-:7. , ~ ~ L ~ , <jG l~ • . _ ' , fp Non•Conforming items: (ProjectorStandardSpecfflcatlon Observed Constructlon is in ~ Non-Compilance wtth) - . . ~ ~ - , . . . j IPE FieId Rep IPE CE IPE PM - Contractor's Rep ~ INt_AND ~ ~ . . PACIFIC DAILY F ENGItVEERJNG. . ~ ~ IELD RE~OF . . . • - . . . . . . . . , c~'e~ ~ + 4f ~ Date ~ ~ ~ ~ tnspectot's Oaily Report No.: : Atrtvat Time ~ IPE Prnject No.. . ea er rage No.. ~ • or ~ . Cltent L,oo _ Repc~esen tlvel phone umber ~ . / V- ~ ~ ~v ~ Z3Z3 General Contractor site epres n~ v 13c, * onernumaer ~ - Subcontractor ~ , IPE ProJect Manager/ phone n m er ~ r ~ IPE Fteld Represe e&e Man ~ wer & Equi ment*Used f_.'~..d A.cA. r~ r• - r''~ t-t ~P.~ ~'~Y=~ Comments: •~rir~.~' • lY ! r i (Wor}c Completed Apparently ~ lY ~ ^ . " , r~' e;:I.,•;~ ::i ..~.i ~ , ...~_.r - perSpeciricatJonsProblems ~ , .f.~,,,~, and their SoluUons) L1 z6lz o , r_ / ' ~ . ~ / ✓ - ~ X -.p, I,:;::, e 'Oo► Q 16e, e4 ~'r ,/'`~q (ol /1"~i , . ...G . ~ c) 74 ci ~ .(j ? o;. Z loe-lo f-- ~ ~ `Y ~ ~ -t ~ ,0~• rP~~ g4v C°~L `t c n. ~ .j~sS . / ~~~~~f • - ' - . ..--J/~:-• ~ - . _I'~ . ~ ~r"~ _ ~ IPE FlELO REPRESENTATtGE - • ~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . , ~ This document and t-eferenced addenda are-to be consldered pre{iminary unttl reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructlon engin er andlor-IPE proJect manager. • . t L - Date Date . - ~ (jIPE~PONIISTRUCTION ENGINEER ~ tPE PROJECT (VIANAGER . , . e - k •sponding Oeficiency Report No: ~ ~ . - ~ INLANO ~ . . DAILY FIELD REP."-'~' PACIFIC ~ ~ rm:ENGINEEIRIN.G, ~ ' ~ - . - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . T oate Inspectofs Oaity Report No.: IPE ProJect No. 'Page ffo. ot-~: Comments: (WarkComptetsdAppanenUy r pecSpecfftcaUons)Problems pd , ~ Q ~q~ , N.~ ~~=fi~ andthelrSotutions) ~,S a Gc~c~- ~«~f ~'`a c,~~ . ~ f• ~ . ~ c , r a`v,~ , /~~c n r~~ ~ T DG. r T~ ~e a~-~r~'^- SG • , ~ . . Non-Conforming Items: (ProJector. Standard Specfflcatlon - ~ - , ~ Obssrved ConstrucUon Is in ~ . Non-Compttancewith) ~ . . ~ , . ~ ~ - . . . ~ r _ • !PE Fie1d Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~~i~_ . , ~ ~ , ~ , + s t~ ~ ` 1 ^ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ r" ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ • 1 j, ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ` ' ~ ` ~ ` I~~ ' ~ n~.jl~ l~. _ . ~ ~ , Bt', , . ~ ~ , W , _ / ` ~ ' _~..r - ` 1~l ' r? ~ -,t" - _ ~ ± / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - r., ~ / / ~ _ ~ ~ } ^ 4 ~+f ~I;'••,~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ -r ~ , r " • ~ ~ ~ r • ~ / iy~,v~ ~ n ; ,r' \ / ~ ~ 4 _ ~ ~ / ~ A(~~ A ~ / ~ ~ 1 ~ M1 / ~ ,1~R --~o--- ( 1 i l~ ~ , 21 ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ nn ~ . \ / ~t ~ ~ 'v4 ~ ~ . Y , I'r' ~^'.~i , / , . . \ ~ , , ~ ~ s`~ V. a ~ , ~ ~ ~ gA ~ ♦1 , ~•r ~ ~ ~ , v ~ / ~ ~ ' A ~~j ~ (20~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ \ ~ fii ~ ~ ~ . / ~ ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ \ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1v / \ ~ ~ \~L ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ` Y / ~ `r y . ! ~ ` ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r 3 i{ ~r"J 1 ` ~i ~ , ~ ~ ♦ 1 ~ / / / F^ ~ •r~ ` ti~~ ` I e.~~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ c, _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ V , ~ C / ~ \ ~ ~~l t j' ~ ~ 1 ` / / ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ - _ BAS~ , _ . + ~ J ` ~ ~ ~ y _ r ~ i~ / r / / ~ ~ u ` / „r r I ` l ~ ` ~ y ~p~J ~ , . /'r`' ,1 J 5 ^~~~~Ug ~ , ~1/, r ~ ~ , f2~~ ~ = ~ ~ / / / \ ~ ~ ~ . ~ !r• ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ v ~ p ' ~ ~ V/ ~ ~ ! ;ti,~ ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ ; ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ r1 } ~ ~j ~ ~ / ~ ~ Bp,S - ~ , I ` ~ r , ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ gp~ ~ ~ ~ . 1g ~ ~ ` ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' '1~~y, 1`1f~ , ..ij i~ . ` f ~ 17' ~ ~ !f ~ ~Rp11~~ ~ ~ r-, \ \ ~ ~ • ~ ~ L~ ~ ~ ' ` ~~~`~~l G ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ . . ~ ~c i \ 1 ~ ~ ~ t.~ I , ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` . ' ~ •~i f , ('1 r~"' ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ' ~ / ' ~ ~ ~ ; ti~~ ~ - _ 1_ _ , ,~~A i~ ~i ' , _ ~ ~ ~ {i~,f} ~ ~ A ' ~ ~J S j~ ~ . ~ y ` j} ` ~ ~ I > t~ i 1 ~ ~ ~~~t~ ~ ~ r, ~1 I. , l /^~1 ~ ~4 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ,F`~~ r ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 7 ry ' ' ~ I ~ l .r / J ~ / ~ / ' r ' ~ 5 ~ • , ~ . ~ ~ r .t;.}~- f ~J ~ ` ~ ~ ' _ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ n • ` ~ ~ ~ € i_ ~ ' J ~`,r - ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ r ~P~~ ~ ~ ~ ; BA ~ , ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~,~._1 A~~ , ~ ~ ,3 , ` I~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A \ ~ r,~ R` , . ~'O/~~ ~ ~ _ ti1 ~ ~ / ~ ~ I ~I~ ' ` ~f ~ 1 ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N ~C ~ .i ? " ~ ~ BA 1 ; - ~ ,f~ ~ ,,,r ~ ~ / i/ ~ ' . . r~'~ I _ ~ ` / I ri~}D ~ " ~ `r' p~^' I f ~ -w- .,.,..r-~r" +I ~ 'a-.• 'j 1 ` . SI~ . ~ , ~ BA " , ~ ~ ~ , . ; IN G; _ _ _ ~ ~ S 1 t : ~ 4 r [ ' ~ i _ r . . - - ; ~ ' . ~ ; - ~J ? ' ~ .1- ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ - A~ ~ ~ ' _ . ~ ` - ' y~ ' fi _ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ -o , . ~ ^ ' ~~Y , ~ U'~ 1 . `~1 . ~ W 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' I i . - M/ tN LAN D ~ . PACIFtC QAtLY FIEL~ O ENGINEERJNGR .EP ~ ~ ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ (1 vate Irispectors Daity Report No.: - 2 e4 ~ . ~ ~1 . Arrival Time - tPE ProJect No,: A 0:~~ ~ . • ~~0 ~ / ~ . . ea er . ~ ` page No.. • o ~ . . . Citent - ~ . Lo I Representatlvel phone number Vi- - G~~ ~ G ~l?~ • ~t ~S• ~ . - ~vt rC~•- 7~0~ ~ Generai Contract~or p . ek epr~esen v ~ ona numper ~ Subcontractor . • , IPE Pro c.t Manager/ hone n~n b r ~ iPE Fte!d RepresentatIv ~ e ~ . . l~ ~ ► .J'~i Man ower & E ulpment-Used ~~~Lrne15r , / Wl ; /0~9 / .llii oQ'w ci ,0 leuz- Comments: / . . (WorkCompletedApparentty if 0 /E) S-Pf~t1 (f perSpecfficatlons Problems / • ° and their Solutlons) 17.,~' /2 ~ ~ ~~e ♦'r ~~I LTI/17 ~ • ~ ~ i- r ~ ~ l, ~ ` + r i'~l ` ~ S ~ J• t /,0 . v /0" T ~ o n va `a - / • . ,z~ . C~~~ ~ - . . . C7 ~~.ileAx- a ~fc ~ ~ . . ~ . e. Gt ~ . ~ . !PE FIELD ftEPRESENTA E. ~ - ~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATiVE • ~ . This document and referenced addenda are to be-considered prellminary untJi reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructlon "engin~er an or'IPE project manager. • . Date ~ Date / ~PE ¢;ONSTRUCTtON ENGlNEER tPE PROJECT fVIANAGER ~ G' . , . . ~o ~ onding Defciency Report No: no - ~ 'k INLAND PACiFIC OAlLY FIELD REP~~~" 4012.-ENGINEERIN.G% ~ ~ • ~ _ . ~ ~ . . Oate Inspector's Oaily Report No.: IPE ProJect No: ~ Page rvo. ~ ot--- _ ~ ico ~O . ~ Comments: XA, v/ (WorkCompletedApparently perSpecHicaUons)Problems 11/~ . and thelrSolutlons ~ • ) Ag. . ~ / 117/,c.~a Id ~ . , . Non-Conform Items: (ProJector dard SpecffTcatlon Observ onstructlon is in No mpliance with) - - • _ . ~ • ' ~ ✓ rt ~ • , IPE Fia-Id Rep IPE CE IPE PM ~ Contractor's Rep w~-"- ~ , ~ , , , ~ . L7 ` .i 1 ' 'Y 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J 4 ~ ~AS ~ ' ~ ~i ~ r' ~ _ I ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ / 1 ~AS - - \ ~ ' ~ > ~ / r~~ ~ ~ ~ / , ~ ~ , r, / ~ t " , , ~ , / ~ V '~'r ~ ~ / ~ , ~ l. _ _ ~ ~ ~ ` n ~ r l ~ ~ / ~ v.. , \ / , y ~ J ~ _ ~ / i- / . ° ~ r~ ~ 1 , (211 ~ ; 1L , ; ~ ~ ; i ~ •.1 , ~ ` ' ~ B ' ~ r-~, . ~ ~ T RAC,T ' A 1 ~ ~ ~ . ~ / ~ / I t,J L' ~ / ~ ~ r~ / n ~ r w~ P , , , , , . ` / ~1/ ' / r~~~ ~r/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . \ (2~~ ~r / / ~ ~ ~ n / ~ j ~ \ ~ f• ~ 'U1 / ~ \ \ V ~ ~ C1 ~ ' » n" S . ~ gp,~ \i r; ~ ` / \ ~C~ i'` --_T_.___.._~_ , ~ ~ ~ ~ A . ~ . If / \ ~ / ~ , . ~ / ~ ~ tVV / ~ , ~ ~ \y ~ ~ ~ M_ , ~ , . ~ y ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . . \ ' ^ ' i ~ , uu ' ~ ~ni I / ~ ~ r~'J ~ ~ r'1L.~ ` 1 r~,r.-.~, ~ \ ty' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,n~-rtn* i ~ ~ ~ ~V~ 1VIV ` ~ 1 ~ / ~ ~ 2 . ~ r ~ y ~ n ~ - ~ , i G~JJ ~ , , ` ; I , ~ \ ` y~' 4 a ~ ` ` / ~ ~ \ ~ ~ } \ r ' 1 , 7 ~ t i~ ~18~ 4~ ' ` ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ . ` ~r~ \ ~ _•P-~ ~~S ~ ` ~ _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ \ y5 p,S~N R ~ ' ~ ~ . ` ~2~~ ~ S~B ~ ~ P~,~~ ~ y!~ ~ ~ ~ y~-.- ~ r ' P~i , ~ ~ , ~1 i ~ , ! . ~ ~ . ~ i ~ ~ ~ \ ~ / M ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ , r ` , 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~J ` ~ . y'' , ~ p, N P ` ~Ac ? ~ ~ ` ~ X ` o ~ „ , ~ J ` , ` 1 ~ , ~ TRACT ~ ~ ~,f ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ , ~ ` f ~ I 1 4M ' \ { lA,~ 1 ' ~ { ~ w ~ ~ . , ; ~ . J/ BA~ c, ~ . ~a~ ~1 ~'rw ` ~ ! I ~ 1 ~ ' J / • 1 ti' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;A ~ . ; F~ ~ , ~ ~ , , b~ ~ N,~ ~ - - . ~ ~ • ` ~ ~ ~ts~ G ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ 1 I r 1 ~ - ~ ir ~ ; ~ / f ~ 1 i ~ ,r''~ri ~ / ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~L , ~ ~ L/~~►~r ~ if,` l~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ` . J ~ ~ / i' ` w~~ r~ ~rr ~rJ~ i r I - ~ ~ ~ , ~ 7 ~ ` _ ~ ` ' ~ ~ ~'j ~ ~ fi I y.~;-~~ 1 ` - ° 1 ~ ~ - h ~ , I , ~ ~ s ` ~ ~ ,r i ~ ~ '1'~ ~ ~ '~~.i (~5 ~r• ~ I~ ' ' ~ ~ , H • ~ 1 1 ~ V~'~ '1(1 r _ .~.~S.l~ , i : ~A~IN BAS ~ , , a ~ r A~ B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ / ~ if ~ ~ r~~~°r ~"~'~...~...~...~f' ~ r, I I ~ ` ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ r , ~ ~ / I 1 ~ 1`~~„~~~ ~ I 1 ~ r. ~ n~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ , B~ . ~ , I , ~ . , ' f~-"`4^ „ ~ 7 I ~ ) ~ , 1 ';3 ' ~ . , ' • ~ . ~ I -....,..r..'""' ~ , ~ - . ' 4 ~ ~AS _ _ ~ ~ r ~ , j ~ ~ ar ~w~ / _ _ r~ ' ~ f ' ~ I ~ t~ . h w~ T 1 ~~T a 'S~N 7 - _ ~~y~ i ~ ~ ~.,,fr'i~~ ~ 1 ~r" L . ~ _ •~1O ) . ~ . ~ ~ ~ , , . ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . ~•A . , , ~ ^ ~ • ~ 7~ , , . , . w ~ ~ . ; ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , . , . , . , w, ~ • • . , ' . . , ~ r, - v , \ A A ` V/ \V y n A ~ ( 1 ~ \ 8 t ?i) v ~ ~ SU6 ^ASI _ ( ~ . . 54 ; I A x _ B N P TRACT R', 0 ~ ~49. ~ 19 18 ~ ~ ► ~ ~ P2 E t~4 : t18) \ \ --tAN~ 8. ~ 9 i ` ~ , - ` 1„J 0 I dAS B .B~~5f q--F-I ~ 1) A ! 18ASI N H . ~ i : I ~`r ~ 1 I 1 I ~ f LAN ~ ~t VG' i~ l , ~ AS"~ N r~ - Ei-BA5 N G. ~ BAS . ~ - - . - - - - r - Y ~ II ) • ~ .r~ l 7~- ~ ~ Fie IW ~A3 l6 ~ - °2 rX4 /,7 ~ INLAND . PACIFtC : DAlLY FIELD REPOf I ENGI(VEERJ~VG . . . . . lC~f.. ~ Date . lnspect6Ys Datly Report No.: ~~i ~ Atrival Time IPE Project No.: /7 Vveather . . . . page No.. • o Cifent ~ . Lo% Representatlvel phon umber ~~2 Z b f ~ 3 General Contractor ~ site epsen v phone number - . ~ Subcontractor . ~ : IPE P Ject Managphone y S~~ IPE Field Representatl e Man wer & Equipment'Used ~ 411 i ,1.l~ -a_s' ; ` L ~ -r l~'~ ~ ~ ~~~P Comments~ ~ (Woric Completed Apparently aZ61614*1~;, o-L/7, 5 ).-Y /"P perSpecificatJons Probiems and thelr Solutions) rJ7^ 1A cy ~ . jr,U _ /~i'~~~ ~.f~' C''S r f" !•G' ~ ~D~U/.~.lf~../, 7_4 . . . , 10,00, ~ _~-~-.t lPE FtELD REPRESENTi~AFi~ • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . Thls document and referenced addenda.are.tabe-consldered preliminary unUi revetwed and slgned by the IPE constructionengtn er andlor*lPE proJecE manager. • . °Date Date , PE C,.ONSTRUCTION ENGtNEER . IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER U . , . esponding Deficiency Report No: ' . L 71NLAND RACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD RE. ~~o = ENGINEERlN.G- - • ~ . ~ . . . Oate . • - ~ ~ Inspectoes Oaily Report No.: t/1176c6j6/ 1-7 ~ IPE Project No. I)age Ro. ot~--- . . Comments: ?-Z / (WotkCompieted Apparentl ~ ~ - perSpecHicaUons)Probtems ~-,,V, CG 0~ l l~1.~5 ~`l ~-91~5 • and thelr Sofudons • . ~ ~ ) Y16,~" C G~.l'it.OYG~~c2, (,vG~ /~d ~2 / 'nl~ V - 17 , Utz"~ A,.:) Ir /14-- lo ei ec ~ ~ `r P s 6 /1-41C. 44--- ~ C.,/ ~t i-ve. ~ ~01_ 16i ~,~x•4e.~.~' ~~ra GcJ~ P ul~ r~a~ CA,i;47 v U • ' . , ~ . Non-Conforming Items: (ProjectorStandard Specfflcatton Observed Cortstructioa ts tn - Non-Compliance with) • ~ ~ - , - - ~ . ~ . IPE FieId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep % . , ' , - 0 4 = ~ . pS, ~ 00000, ~ / ~ ~ ~ _ . ' / r j ~ , 4 r%; r ~ / / / 4r0 4 ~ x/ / NS/ A 4 ~ I~ ~d~ rz ~ 100, (2Q) ~ / ` 100, ~ ~,,,•~.L .»d'~ A ' 6r 1 / .ooo 4 14, / ~ r~ _ - ~ ~ r.. - V ~ ~ ~7 ~r r ~ i ~ ~ . ~ ' ~ r ~ / ~ G ° ~ ~ _ ~ AMWO / . Ff ~,j.~~ ? ' ~ [ ~ ~ j1 A ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~~I~+~~'~~~ ~ • % _ - ' Qy ~ "'a r * ~ , . , ~I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . A A 13AS V A A-• ~ C' ~d)( e) / \ •r~ / - / `2 i . ` ♦I loll ~ ~ " 4100 f , ~ ♦ 8 ra ~ ~ G i , - `21 ~~U B A` ~ ~0 I . ~ ~ - ?1 ~ . -C . loe ~ ~ ~ ~ ' / .i ( ~ / ` . „ , BA - N P . T RACT R' ~ASI x ~ ~ ; 19 Q 18 - - - - , r ~ ~ , Q2 I k'~ ' / r .1 ~ ~ ~ (18) Li AUGW . ~-tAN~ t~7 ~ f ~ ~ ~ t• ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~l r ~_~P•^~~~'--_ / L. ~ BASiN -•C_ ~ - % ~ 5 ~fJl o , - F AS B EjA F-1 - L--.-------, . A I~ %f - r---- . 113ASI N H . ~•r :~t . . 11 1 s ~ r_ . ' z"'__~-• ` 1 ° ~ ~ - -r ~ ~----~f c , 12 9 4^4 ~ss s n<~ q E ' BA~ N G' ~ ~ BAS . ~ ~ ~ ~f s - . II Q 'Q y ~ IE wafK 75- Ol/ 17 ~ JU4 7C - '71 ~o~ ~ iNLAND . ~ ~ - . PACIFlC DAlLY FIELD REPOF a ENGI(VEERJNG Oate lnspectAi's Daity Report No.: . ~ ~ Arrlval Time ~ . IPE Project No.: 110, 94 ~ • a~ ~ - A 07a~ ~ ~ . Wea-fher rage No. or • •1 , ~ ' ~ ♦ ~ ' • . Client . ~ . ~ Loaal RepresentatJve! hone numb r M~r~~.s ~ . - .D . .6~ z3z ~ 3 General Contractor U ~lepresen v p~ one um er ~ _ , . Subcontractor : • . n IPE P ect Managerl, hone nu~g be a«S/ ~ ~ IPE Fietd Representativ~ ~ - - ~ . Man er & E uipment*Used Z7 ' -t P eZ , : . ~ - • / . 1 Comments: ~Xf (Worit Completed Appar~ently perSpecificatlons Problems . ~ ~ andthelr Sofutlons) ~~j ~L~ d'•-~ G! ~/'~G/~ ~_,1~'~C.c.u eo a ~./00,,~4 -7 . /.~n c-I e r 'r.•v. c s A00e, ~ . .~r r ~ ,i dI w~L~z. j^2G~~'~~ . . ~t~ u~~ C~'~?~ S~ 8 2~.. ~~P % v► P~ f-t~. . r. ~ . i!~l:•t A ~ - . 45 _ : • . .r ~ . ...A~ _ IPE FIELO REPRESENTATIV • ~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE ~ . , , . . Thls document and referenced addenda.are.to.be. constdered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructlon engineer atadfor'tPE proJect manager. • ~ Oate Date ;1 ~ ~/I r 1' ' f%~.,., • • , . • • Y , r 11 ~ . , E CrSTRUCTION ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT t1AANAGER ~ , . , - L~.sponding Defctency Report No . . - ~ lNLAND DAi LY Fl ELD REMM~' PACIFIC . r , ~ 54:ENGlNEERIN.G~ Inspectoes Oal{y Report No.: / T Oate 7O 4616 94, . . - , - - IPE Project No. • : - ~ ~'age r~o. " ~ ot-- - - - • . ~ . _ : • C_'O ~l_~1'lJ ~~-~~:1 ~ ~'~of'? G3 ~ ~C°~1 F Comments. . ~ . , (Work Completed Apparentty / . perSpectflcationslProblems t'') tIz ar►dthetrSolutlons) ~ • / - Li A~ rJ ~ ~l ~ /'rJ Al -e P' f~ . .ir . _a .S ~ - O t.~ ~ vc e. rp" /lie- I^ , . / -7 . • / 7~ ~xi.-~ ~i ~ X~, ' • ~ . . , . • - ; . Non•Conforming Items: (ProJectorS#andarciSpecEttcation • - r " ' , Observed Constructlon Is ln . Non-Compitancewith) • . _ ' IPE Fiaid Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ INLAND ~ " . PACIFIC - . ; . DA1LY FI ~ . ELD RE O , ENGtNEERjNG ~ Oate ' . ' . . fnspectoYs Daity Report No.: . s ~ ~ Arrtval Time ~ - ~ fPE ProJect No.: We-afher _ page N0.. • _ ✓ or ~ . . . . Cltent . , . . Laoat Representattvel-phone numbef ' General Contractor ' M{e 7kepresen &veT~rp ~~one numoer , • Subcontractor IP E ProJect Manager! phone n, b r ~S~~i~:~ . ~ . iPE Field Representative • . ~4 ~i~ r~',~,-{t•t~'+a/ , Manpower & Equtpment*Used ~ ~r , ~ • . ~ ~i~~~.~' ~i~Ps. t~ . I' ~ ~ • a , ~ t tJ ko P/ l( yI ~T^ ~d f ~f•y.fl.iaf /~fn,~'~'. - . Commenfs: (WorlcCompletedApparently 7t~ ~rSpeclfications Problems o -dthelrSolutlons) i 4.r.~ 5'1 I--e 0"(.44 4 0)'.P.15 a/i1 ~ l~Ii'!_r. Gr.if. ~ ~ l.s..Ll~-• ~~~~'~~i/ Y I~~~~ ~ ~ l l . / ~ Z il S ~ / 4' ~ ~ 1 T c~ 65• •r' ~--•i / ~ L.~/~-~~/f r.~ ~ ~ / /~G ~CL t , //J' • ~ ~ xr- A ~~ir.~ ~.*~..c.x..~tr Wor ~ - . IPE FIELD REPRESE~T{VE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . , . . This document and refetenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untll reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer ndlor'IPE pnoject manager. • . Date ~ Date • ~ ~ , . E C NSTRUCTtON ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER ~ - Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: < . . ~~tNLAND a~ ~ PACtFIC DRILY FtELD REPMft ~ . . ~ :ENGtNEER1N.G,, • . . . ~ - ~ ~ - oatB tnspector's Da1{y Report No.: IPE Project No. ~ . t'age No. . . ~j'~ Comments, . (YVoric Completed Apparentty perSpecfflcations,Probtems and theirSotutions) ~ ► " f W ~ ~ . ~ 4o 0W07 P &1e. . . . . ~ Non•Confornning Items: (PmJectocStandani SpecHToatton • • " " ' ~ , Observed Constructlon Is In , Ncct-Compliancewith) ~ . ' ' . • - ~ . . , • • . ~ IPE Field Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep - -VOINLAND - ~ PACIF{C DAiLY FlELD REPOF . ` ~ ENG1NEERJNG 77 . . . . . Date yl ~ ~ InspectoYs Oaily Report No.s Arrtval Time ~ . IPE ProJect No.: ~ . . Weatner ~ page Ao:. o - ~ . Cilent Loofq Repcesentative/ hone number ~C°~ ~L l'd~'-P~/~-~-5 • - ~ 26~ ~ ~ 2~~?. General Contractor eRepr~sen v p~ one numper Subcontractor IPE ProJect Managerl phone number ( ✓~~11~ Sz-dw ~ IPE Field Representative.,~ ~ Ma er & Equipment'Used /vw et "OW eit /Ot4p 1-;ai..~ ovt.,e e:~, C~, ~ ) (~(J~-t / 1 ~ ~ G ~ ~-L. /~UG.-/-~r • C~ r.i•~`"t~~~:.5 ~ 1,L~? ~.l~s, r"" ~Y' r- 1 ~ . r~ ~ . ~r•y~ r 6 Comments: (Worft Completed Apparently perSpectficatlons Problems / fX-1 ana their solutlons) ~ / / ''j._',' ~t. . . , , / I I P. '~/f ' • ~ ~ " ~ l ' ~ / C~~ { ! j, V~ " ~ ~ a-L ~'i~ ' ~ ~ • yt,s`[ /4:~ ~ ~ ~ IPE FIELD R PRESENTATIVE. ~ • GC~NTRACTOR,S REPRESENTATIVE . , . This document and.teferenc.ed.addenda are to be considered preliminary untll reveiwed and signed by the IPE construcUon engtneer andlor,iPE project manage. • ~ . = Date ~ Date ~ , )~PE f NStRUCTtON ENGlNEER . IPE PROJECT fV1ANAGER Ir . . L,t'.~zsponding Defciency Report No. - 1 ~ PACIFIC OAILY FIELD REP~~~' 1z:ENGINEERIN.G-- Inspectoes INLAND Oate Oa11y Report No.: fPE ProJect No. 1 ~ Page No. ~ - . • . ~.D . . . ~ Comments: (Work Completsd Appamntiy • • - perSpectiicaUons,Probiems 1~~~`~~~'p and thelrSolutlons ) s • L ~ / / / F~ ~i'~'L~ .f~i/ ~it / ~,~t<• ^ IJL~ Z. :.~Gt ~ f " .~~"f..~/~`~ . ~ ~ . , . . . , Non•Confocming ltems: (ProjectorStandaniSpecfftcation Obssrved Construction Is In ~ ~ ' ' • ~ Non-Compllance with) ~ - - . . ~ ~ . • - / ~~~✓7 IPE Fiald Rep IPE CE lPE PM - _ Contractor's Rep ~ tNLA-ND 0PACIFIC ~ . DAILY FIELO . ENGI(VEER~NG . . . REPO . . . . . . . . . Oate , / • lnspectors Daily Report No.~ ~ ~ . Arrtval Tirne 1PE Project No.: ea er • _ . ~ i-jage ivo.. . • . . Cltent Laoa! Re cesentatlvel phone n be~ ~ Generar Con~actor • ~e~tepres v pionenuiWW - •Subcontractor~ IPE Pro ect Managerl phone nu be . / . . ~ /~.S - . IPE Fietd RepresentaUve y``~ ~ , Man o er & Equipment'Used ~ 000, &/'d . ~ . ~ Comments: / (WotfcCompletedApparentlY ~ ~ ' //'3 ~Ix/ fP ~n~C3 / ~ Q,.~jS~d~lJP ~rSpeciflcatlons Probierns ~ id thelr Sotuttons) /ze? / yj zoz ewz ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,4~1 C A /e a ZL a o ~ '00~ r/, • ' to/l !ol I a • . Q J Q qLeel -to eI ZWeY ls r ~ ~ a •r:r `J :r~I~Y~r t I~~Wrr~ - .f•~~ ••~rA ~ • • • . • • ~ ~ IPE FIElO .R`EPRESENTATiVE • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructton engineer a~dlor,tPE proJect manager. • . Date Date , ' , ~ IP +CO~'STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT 11AANAGER ~ - . Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: . - ~ -W INLA-ND ~ . PACIFIC ~.Z DAtLY FIELD REP~I~' ~ ° • ENGINEERiN.G• - - ~ - - - Date tnspector's Oaily Report No.: c;2 IPE Project No. Page tro. Comments: (Wcrk Completsd Apparec►Uy • • perSpeciftcattons,Probiems ~ Ite7Xoo . and their Solutlons) ~ ~ G S Ad u ~ . . u 14.. O/'I ~I~1 ~~7~` r t ~ ~ ~~i / l.I C~7 ~ ♦ ~ l~ !-c.~ Ar' r' J7 4ol • ~ . s~ 6 ~ ' ~ ~C~/~.'t ~t ~r ~ t.~.~i~ ~ .1,4~ r'/ 04 PO ~ / i f" r e 1 . G . ~ . ~p ~l~e.P / r Z ~m ~ /J e, 0002- ~S GJJ 1rh-C. izo . ea, e C) n 4^a r A r'' Gt- 9/^ eer'.f. ' ✓ ! ~~/I a t~ ~ ~ ~Z~ ~ r' .t..' ~ ~~.e. ~ !_..r / o~'~ ~t. /..5. ~ - ( r~ • Gt,C~• •r~~a ~.e.,.. l„i l ~ . r:q'~ . J--,7 IPE Field Rep fPE CE 1PE PM ~ Contractor's Rep INLAND . . ~ ' PACiFIC : . DAIL.Y FlEL D REPO1 ENG _ , _ INEERI(VG . . . ~c~P . Date ~ - InspectoYs Oatly Report No.: ~ ~ . _ ~o.~,~-~.~- ~z Artival Time IPE Project No.: We-alher _ , - ~page Ro.. • -or. _ . . S - ' . Ctlent . . Loaal Representattveit fio e number ~ o ~ Co~~ L~ General Contrac r e eesen t v p" one number Subcontractor ~ . IPE ProJect Manager/ phone nu er .:JTv~ tPE Fteld Representative Man wer & Equlpment'Used ~f ~ ~ C• l.eJ ~ ,~F~ ~9 G~/ /.J i~~lLP~% / /CJIn J~ Deei''C.v- AP40 n o ~U P _ /lr~ , ~O ~ ~ ~ ~/~b ~ ot Comments: . . /-r (Worfc Completed Apparently _1~ S/ Z0. c/ T7 ~ :,~---rSpecifcatfons Problems . ~-d their SofuUons) / l~h ~l~I l.rJ ~ . i. ii F r/ l9 vI . 1 To C~Ct t/ JC- ~ J ' f 1 ,-T_~i ~'l YtC/~ /n c_°~ ~ C ~(,°C~('r'r t i - , ~~1 %~d d //(X 70~)' a'e,.T~ 1t -C / "`e c,-- /,ei P /~C G{ 11"4 Ao- 1, i.° J ~7 l-~ r P ~h _G ~ U1• ~ r'' f,c d1 -ic'c`'. i , . • - , ~ . ~ _ . rA ` ~ . ~ . . IPE FIELD REPRESENTA • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . This document and referenced addenda are to be considered prellminary untll reveiwed and signed by #he IPE construction engineer andlor-IPE proJect manager. Date ~ . Oate .~-t-- 1E CQ~WS~RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER ~ ~ - - Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ' . • 7 tNLANO PACIFIC DAlLY FIELD REP''' ~ ENGINEERtN.G• - • - - . ~ ~ - ' . Oate Inspectors Datly Rgport No.: IPE ProJect-No. . ` - Page uo. _ : ~ o~--- - - - . ,;2 / - Comments: Pf~' ~ (VYotkCompleted Apparentiy ~ perSpecfficatlons,Problems p ~ L '00 ~~►~v and 1rSolutlons) .00 ~~t A-IGt ~ h0 /1 GL 7,_fi. D s (z c.~r C-,/ ~,A~ep /Xz ~ - ~ C.~ ) 0 t~ d ~P CA- /W 1--e e Q ~l ♦ . Non•Conformfng ttems: ~ • ' (ProJectorStandard Specffication Observed ConstrucUon Is in ~ ~ • ~ Non-Compi(ancewith) • - ~ • ~ - , . IPE Fiald Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep - - rim tNLAND PAC1FIC ~ DAtLY FtELO REPO ~ . . ve~ ~ o ENGINEERjNG,. . . Oate ~ Inspectoes Oaiiy. Report No.: . Acctval Time IPE ProJect No.: . ~a~~-~ _ ~ . Weatner page iqo.. Cllent Lo 1 Representattvei pho e number ~ . ~ one nu~n er Generat Contrac ' r epresen v p . , . Subcontractor ~ . ~ !PE ProJect Manage ! phone n mb r ~ / ~ -e,.. •~'r~ C.P tp~ ~ r~~s.,~R'- 68'y~ IPE Ffeld Represen tlve . p Man ower & Equi ment'Used 14 - ~ n.. ~ Comments: (Work Completed Apparentiy e~~-•-= '-erSpeclficatlonsProblems d theic Solutlons) z- l.! ~ ~ t~ i'1 . _ C.c. ..S ~ f~ ~ !i ~'1 C~ Gt" ~s U ✓'t~ . , , .f l' n ~n G ~a ~ .~a p.rc~e~ ~ ~a y ~,~,~.~i .00, ~ c.r P~ %!!I G 6r~, ~ d1 f~ l~tJ i T .S/~C~, ' . 5,-00J ~ ~.~~Q / . T~ ~ ~r_ ~ , ~ , . 1~ ~7 . , C,. a , e o .,o,- 0;14 ~ . IPE FIELD REPRESENTATt~~~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE ~ . . . This document and referenced addenda are to be considered prelimtnary unt11 reveiwed and slgned by the IPE construction engineer andlor,IPE project manager. • ~ ~ f' Date Date l~COOSTRUCTfON ENGtNEER lPE PROJECT NIANAGER ~ ' - - - Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ ~ lNLAND - PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD RE. ; . . • . . ' • _ ~ ENGINEER1N.G ~ ~ . Date Inspector's Oatly Report No.: IPE Project No. 13age Ro. ~ - ot_----~7 Comments: . -Q s ~ ~ ~ C~► ~~z. ~ ~ ~ ~r~ . . (WorkComAleted a~nt1 aPP Y r perSpectftcatlons,Probiems , ~ ~L f ~a/,~~. andtheTrSoiutions) eY CJ ~ -2 % rh s7~~ e-,! (.v A6 e. `7. w~•~ //(,o 01/t, ~ dg-l t-.* % Ao ~ ~a n ` 7~,-n 8ovv,d /P le/ • . . ~ • . ~ • . Non•Conforming ttems: ~ • ' (ProJectorStandard Specffication ~ _ . • ~ Obsarved Constructlon ts In Non-Compifancewlth) • • ~ . - y . • . ' . ' (D . . ~ ► . IPE Ftald Rep 1PE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ INLAND U PACIFtC : . . ENGI(VEERj~IG OAIL.Y FlELD REPO f C~ e`'Gt) ~ . Oate - tnspectoYs Daily Report No.: Atrival Time lPE Project No.: 7#1150 - . . . _ . / We-a- her _ page no. . / S GC/~~t-~ - _ ° ' . . Cllent Loaal RepresentaUvel phone nu er ~o 1' C ~ Lo zl _ ~3~ Generaf Contractor Site eprese f v phone n m er . Subcontractor 1PE Projec Manager/ ph/one numb ~C- IPE Fleld Representatlvd ~ ~ . . Man wer & Equlpment'Used t6 0 r_~ ) !1l~cQ.~, ' ~ " - ► ~ r . o ~n e~ / ~ ~'1 r~ 7 90 - ~/C elp / ? . Comments: (WarkCampfeted ApparenUy T~ C? rSpectficatlons Problems i d their Sotuttons) r/ ~j ~ /~J S~G ~~Ct Ti D:~1 c-/ l- ~ ~ _.GCl.~► O ~.,,~e' ~.~P~'~ :~..P • fi ra X-a. Ie~./,~c / . , y~e/ 7-A-s- Zo le G ./47 ri ~ /.2 ft , . . . .,i.~ ~X@ , &~Lf . , r;~e ~a /0 /.e * IPE FIELO REPRESENTAT~VE • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . This document and referenced addenda are to be constdered preliminary untIl reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructlon engineer andlor-IPE proJect manager. • ^ ~ . - Date . ~ Date IC ST UCTION ENGfNEER IPE PROJECT fV1ANAGER Corresponding Defciency Report No: ^ . l 'M INLAND ~ . PACIFIC ~ . DAILY FIELD RER..~~' ~ r■- ~ ENGINEERiN.G = ~ ~ • - - . ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ . - ~ . Oate . ~ ~ - ~ • ~ ~ ~ tnspector's Daily Report No.: lPE ProJect No. : - ~ Page N*o. ~ ot---~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ ~ . . ~ . Comments: . ~ (WorkCompletedAppanenUy • . • perSpecffieatlans,Pcoblems Li ~ y~ . and theirSoluttons) - cot~i l~1 J~ o ,0 e di 's ~ ~ c~ e o/, 7b /`I c. ✓'e-f f'M P*J 4e. : %j 0 i`r //a L'!G 6fe) . ~ Non-Conformtng Items: " • ~ (Pt+ojectorStaitdard SpecFficatlon Observed ConstrucUon is In Non-Compitance with) • ~ ~ IPE Fia-ld Rep IPE CE IPE PM ~ Contractor's Rep . INSPECTOR'S . . REPORT. SPECTOR: . PROJECT NO.: PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: WORK PERI00: A: . M. ~ P.M. WEATHER A.M.,,~. 010 0 . P.M.: ° ~/~r~ ~'o ~l Qr VISITORS: . , MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: _ FOREMAN: OPERATORS: S LABORERS: ~ -SURVEYORS: - FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQU I PM ENT US ED : 2~~s ? r~2v,t" ~ ~~•r - ' ~ ~:a~~ C~~ . ~ . . , . . ACCOUNT OF. WORK AND DtSCUSSIONS ?RAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: , T_I ME : WORK*: ~ ~G ''_r,r~,P_ ~ /,'~i1 % ~n.~,~~~~,~-~ ~r /~O C~'~e t ~ xc~ r~C~ ~~t~ ,rL ~y N~ • ,-~r~~~~ 7`/!ti ~ ~ ~ / / / ~~~Q ~d i ~~ee_ zLe M4 /"f'l ~"Jre (/conti nued on back) TESTS: WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: • UTIIILTY/PROPERTY DAMAGE: . REVIEWED 6Y - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: y l? ~6 ~ v PAGE / OF DATE : q Y - ~ ~ ACCOUNT OF WORK (CONT'D) IME : ~WORK : ~ , . - . . . ` ~ .J7`"~'✓~ rlr~/.Of t.r~ rt'I~' ~7'-'Ji~ ct`f 4-c~'D~~~ d~~ .r - . c d. ~ C~. ~Q i l~ ~ c.0 l~ 1'l~ a- i~~C1~~7C,'• . ~ 34 ~ r~~~i ~ ,t7~~r _ ller~ n~/~d~~rl~l , H~► 170/ .~f~/ ~,n.i~/J`~ ~l./~v~~~l~~r_~ ~'e~a~ L~~L.t' -~~12T • '~r~t~NE/`j~c~e'~~/~= ~ • ~ -Z- / f ( ' o./~~' t %~~,.d"~ ~l .r~~s~/~ f1c1,,,f/~ ~'1 ~►p~G~rG ~r/~r~l~ ~ :t~ G_!OF :V,..~' ~f`Lr F Gr /.o ~ ~f i91, ~ ~ ~ ~ d- ~ ~ ~ ~ . / at/~ L GG.~ ~(!7 G1i"~Tf.l r ! ~T ~i ~ .G. ` ~j T/J.✓' Cr (~~i/Y~ C! j~//9~ ,p~ . '7`~~Qr' e --rs /X, r1rl c~"!~Q '~'j ~ ,~~i4,nr~ ~~i~ii f _-~>~i ~-~,~1~ G~~l mi~ . • - " ~ ~ cGr Cf~ /!'ltM r ~ h.' %Fi Z~ ;'P'-'~"74 7~ •~l_~ ,(.i~ rri ~ ~ - , vc1 / • ~ ~,~r~P~7"~ ~ ~'~•t' ~ c' ~ : . ~i~~i~9~~/ T Cef'.~'~ - i' , i ~1`'Y ~~'~`'`~~/l7Cl~'? C.7 ~!%~,~7~.c~ • QQP~bX~~►+~~ , , / ~O ~ ~ ~ rb , E 20S . rhiG~/Q 01` i~ l/S'~ lc'~rg~,, Z . . ~ . ~ , _......,~..c fj , : ~ , . . . _ _ . . . : _ - ~ - - T~ . . ' J n . ~.5.. . w.1.~...~..~iar..... . . . • . . . . : . r. : : - . . ~ . J: :••l~ ~............~./.iY::.Y/'.l'.~! . + . . . . . T . ~ I` ~`J . . • . 15 L.F: OF 2" CLASS 6 ASPHALT CONCRETE ON ~ ~ ~ , . ~ . j ON 4 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE - ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ CONCREfE INLET TYPE 1 ; SET GRATE AT POND BOTTOM ELEVATION . DEPRESS 5' ASPHALT PAD .1' ~ ~ ~ ~ BELOW GRATE ELEVATION ~ ` - . , • ~ TOP OF 6ERf~ ELEV. ~ ~ ^ _ - - - EDGE OF PVt~T. EL 3ERM ELEV. = PVMT. EL _ ~ ~ + .20 . . ~ : ~ NDARY ' ' i ;ia i 's ~ : c: ':s•+ ~ ~`u . ::3 ;s " :~:;~j' ~ •y! , ~ ' , . . s • i;:: f;• ~ ~ , . _ ~ .-,r. ~s : ~ ~ ~ i,"i Et:?~~ i'= ,i . :t ~.i , ~ . . i' }~23 1. ;t:t:, ~ '~4 ~ ' l i; ~ 1 . =''rr ~f ' ~~i~ %if ~ i;~ ' .c:. E ` ~ i? ::i: • ~ it~~. , a. . ;:r .tr.f(~ i _ . , i f'~ r. ' i: t i {'~z~ ~ - rn..~ . ,1YI~ .IR . « ` ~O ~ ~ NC ETE INLET TYPE 1 PER 1 PER ;ANE COUNTY STANDARD . ~ SPOKANE C0. STD. B-5 " 8" DRYWELL WITH . ' STA. 25+87.96 LT. WITH TYPE -5 (ITH TYPE 4 L FRAME & GRATE SALMc~N RIVER lA 5~~ra~ Fwu~ NE ~ ~ c~r E (STD. .rr ' , , . 28 28 LT. CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 PER _ GRATE ELEV.=2029,75 ~ ELEV,=2027.49 T , _ ~ - ` SPOKANE C0. S D B 5 SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARO WITH TYPE 1 METAL FRAME B-10 WITH ' ~ T'(°E "B" DRYWELL W H - 40 L.F. OF 12" OIA. CMP ~ IT ~ IYPE 2 GR~TE 8-~ 3) rrPE a~ETaL FRA~E & GR~TE S=0.0063 ~MP ( . STA. 24+73 16.5' LT. STA. 25+50 25' RT. ~ . IE W~=2027.62 ~ GRATE ELEV.=2030.54 ~ CRATE ELEV.=2027.87 IE E)=2027.37 2 , , . ~ . ~ i ~ „ ~ 115 L.F. OF 12 DIA. CMP / Ij ~ ,~r ~ S=0.0063 . / r- r , IE(S)~=2028.44 . - . . - _L__----- . r' . ~ . IE(N)=2027.72 ( . ~ - PROVI ' . D 4 I ~ ~ ~ E W DTH CONCRETE . . . ~ . , ..:r-.: APR ~ - ~ ON FROM CURB INLET 1YPE SICRETE , _ f .r. - -J . • , . . ~ _ ~ . TO P ~ OND BOTfOM ~ . w,,,,.. _y-' I LET TYP E 1 ~ ' ~ . ' . • ~ . ~ . , , , ' • ' . . I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . . ' _ Y ~ . 1 - . ~ _ • - - • - . ~ ~ . n , ~ ~ = 1 =20 • . ~ ~y--- ~~j . ELEV 2026.99 . . , ~ ~ AREA = 256 SF f - . . - . I ~ • . _ ~ ~ . - ~ ----•I 63.5 LF , , ~ ~ ' _ - . ~ ~ ~ J , • _ , . . 1 I' ~ ` 'i' • ' • ' ' , - , , 4 - 2028.42 ~ - . _ , _ . _ ~ . .D - 118 CF • , ~ . ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ TOP - • ~ ,D = 128 ~CF - . • . . OF 6ERM EIEV.- . . ~ ~ ~ " " tOP ~ . . ~6 , ...~r~W OF CUR6 ELEV. =LEV. L.._..~,._ .J , ti ♦ . 2~ ~ =LEV. J1Y DARD ~ovo ~ IELL 1NITH ~ .i. FRAMiE & GRATE 0/' ~ . ?t' RT. 027.49 ~ ~ „ , ~ ~ ~ D M ~ C POND BOTTOM ELEV = 2027,37 ~~20 DRAINAGE _ . ~ POND BOITOM AREA = 180Q SF WHERE SHC )RAINAGE STRUCTURE - PERIMETER = 172 ~F NHERE SHOWN ON PL INSPECTOR.'S . REPORT INSPECTOR: PROJECT N0. PROJECT: CONTRACTOR: WORK PERIOD: `7 A.M. ~ P.M. WEATHER A.M..: . ,S"o° P.M.: e5;;o° ~ . VISITORS: - MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENOENT: FOREMAN: ~rl ✓el OPERATORS: LABORERS: a SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: . EQU I PMENT USED : 7//j: /I~ ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. • STREETS CIOSED: T.IME : WORK : Q~ ~ t~..',c~ ~fl/ 22;.o- X4 e • .~i ~ ~vL• L.L.L~ ~r ~N. ~Lf ~ , /.J i~/l ~ ' i Lr/ Z14 / / 1~ Aaor. ~T e i ~ ~057 ~ ♦ P. ~ -~.~~J' i/~'/ =r`~c'~ T / . (cont i nued on back) -TESTS : WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: , LILTY/ PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED 6Y - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: )A ; . 17 PAG E~ 0 F~ A / ~ DAT E: - - c AC~ oNrt'o) ~ V1IORK ( ~ OUNT ~F - ~ . ~ f 4e T IME : WORK : : ~ c.' . /o~ • I • / Zd~~~ • ~~~'e~;i-- r s ~~'~J~ • r ~ G ~ ~ .~,o • ~ ~ &`lP' - / ~ ' ,t~ ~ . , o sa!" ~ ~ • . ~ ~ . . • . S'• . ~ • . , ~ • . ' • ' , • . . _ . - ' • "-'.•"-.--"""'.-.~,rv__-r_'-' • -r•. . - . ti ~ • • I . 5 ~ 4 - - . TOP OF BERM ELE/. _ EOGE OF PVMT. EL + .20' i Y .a. . _.:j.. T:,....;. i .i.' 1 ~;:i Y' i' :3',' ' t ~t:~:~ a~y: # .:~1*c. it: i~ ~ : .;:1! ~ `j~ 3 ii::ti~ ~iis :~p~:. '2' 1 y~ w~ i 41' ~ { ~,t•~• • , 1 ~i~ 6f2` ` t.~ F'. :yi ;'X it: •?t ~ ~ .r'~,:. i. j_'"... . , - CONCRETE INLET TYPE 1 PER SPOKANE C0. STD. B-5 STA. 25+87.96 LT. WITH TYPE ~ )N RIVER -LANE ~ . s METaL FRAME & cRATE (sro. a- 16) ~ GRATE ELE1/.=2029.75 COUNTY STANDARD PE~DRYWELL WITH - - 40 L.F. =0F 12" OIA. CMP PE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE ~ . 5=0.006_3 A. 25+50 25' RT. IE~W)=2027.62 ;ATE ELEV.=2027.87 IE E)=2027.37 - T oo r _ ~ . . , . . . i - ~ . . C~• r•_ PROVIOE 4' WIDTH CONCRETE . . _ , , r- APRON FROM CURB INLET TYPE 1 C - - " _ ~ - •r- , / , • TO POND 80TTOM t. ' M . y ~ " ~ ' ~ . J,a ~ ~ ! ~ `(1 -"~?.a ~ ! f+' ~F~r ""(~_'q:-'. • . ~ - . • ' ` _ • . ~ ; 14 . - . . - ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . _ . ~ - ~~l ~ 2 ~ ♦ ;ACT A TOP _OF BERM ELEV.= TOP OF CURB ELEV. . L••~..~r..~. s~ ..r..~..J + .20' . . ~ ~ 10 ~ P 0 N D" RT" 4 4• ~~I1rz POND BOTTOM ELEV - 2027.37 l~-20' DRAINAGE STRUCTURI POND BOTTOM AREA = 1800 SF WHERE SHOWN ON f PFRItu1FTFR = 172 I_F ' ~ . INSPECTOR'S -DAILY REPORT SPECTOR: PROJECT NO.: qcge,70_1 PROJECT: CONTRACTOR 9! •fdos' . WORK P ER I OD : A. M. P. M. . WEATHER A.M. : P.M. : VISITORS: MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT SUPERINTENDENT: FOREMAN: OPERATORS: LABORERS: -SURVEYORS: FLAGMEN: OTHERS: EQU I PMENT USED : r ACCOUNT OF WORK AND DISCUSSIONS TRAFFIC SIGNS AND 6ARRICADES CHECKED: A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: T.I M E : WO RK : . ` Z .t•~ e2~ 7 •.70 %`ie, 41 - ~ 7'7 g/ ~/jar~~.~,n.~►r~ .t~.rc.~~// i,:,7 -1Z t . . ' C9 ~ /rt, O/'o~•_ `i r~ /6 D ~ CQ Th E ~ ~B % 7'C • ~dl~4 e ~rl Q' 4r'~ 4~?1 Gl.red/ ~ ~r~cP fd/~ NoOn -~n ~o 1~~~ ~i'~rll fp , ' LU~ /."DU ,~g af."f i ~ 749 WORK DELAYS: , AS BUILT NOTES: , CITIZENS CONCERNS: . , UTILILTY/PROPERTY DAMAGE: REVIEWED 6Y - PROJECT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: ~ PAGE ~ OF DATE: / 7 INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT R . ENGINEERING ~ Oate Inspector"s Daily Report No.: Z~ ~~'I"'ILe• , . Arrivai Time IPE Project No.: - wveatner rage ivo. _ at Client Locai Represe tivel phone number ~ 1A. G Genera Contractor _ 5ite Hepresentauvei pnone number Subcontractor IPE Project anagef/ phone numbeF -l2 OcW0 {PE Field R resentativ ~2tec~`.~ ~!~/~Q7?~P Manpower & Equipment Used 1~ ~c~r ~ r.1v~To ~ Y~r"' ~ ~ - Comments: (Worlc Completed Apparently ~ ~~~r~-~~ j perSpecifications Problems • ' f~ ~ -'eirSolutions) Ai-c, 1 A1 fl>2~,~c..~ DxrAlc, OV60Z ETIJ304r, 7-6 "-j,%AQD lle-> \.t.l_OL-L~ A'S r:5rjd4a R.r&,cb 00"...- t . NA-rt-v 9 s6 1 &s . J--~ ~rP, vs~~. a, Y-. rz~ Po,.AP- n~0&7.F-- _ _ . ~ ~ . , IPE FtEID REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE Thls document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor IPE project rnanager. - Date Date i~ COPSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT NAANAGER , Corresponding Deficiency Report No: 1NLAND ~ : . PACIFIC : DAILY FIEL ► 0 ENGI(VEERlNG * . ~ D REPO . . . . Ic~e~'r~~/ ~ . . Oate - lnspector"s Oajly Report No.: A a ~ - Acrivat Time IPE Project No.: 4~G o We-a-ffier . . . rage iio._ . _oit.._ . _ t`~•~~ _ ~ ~ Ciient , . Loaat epreseM~j ~ione number Geneca Contrac Site ep~Sen one number - Subcontractor . . IPE Ject Mana e phone u ber 1ta ~~d+ ~'v~ IPE Fieid Representati~e'~?Y . . . Man wer & Equtpment~Used ~ ~~o~ ~ 7'`' Za, .0 • r ~ , ~ A r'`k-t ~r^ Gler ~0/m m e n ts: .R_(WorkCompletedApparently f / -S ~ L-J, rSpecificaUons Pnoblems . d thelr Solutlons) ~ ,eo~ 0/ Zi.c 0 - i f ~ ` / T--Z4 , . ~ f~..~. t~c r~ ~ P il~' ~ lJ ~r S' r ' ~ ' ~o.~ 4/ G~ s 1~10 ~~i ~ ~ /t~ G . / ✓ . ~ . o A ~ 1-1 e-I ~ CA C/ A le [~c ~t ..y ~ . . ~;~o i,~ ~:~1~5 Gr 1~►. ~ ~ . . ~ . ~~..c....~ ~1 ~ . . . 7, l .O REPRESENTATIV • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be consfdered pteliminary unt11 reveiwed and signed by the IPE constrvc on engineer ndlor*lPE project manager. Date ~ - Date - Aq. r ~ f Al- L i COOTRUCTION ENGINEER {PE PROJECT (VfANAGER _ ~ . . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ` ' " i • ~ r ~ pAIL1C FIELD . , . • . . - • +'•T. ` , . C • • ~ 7s Da11y Repo~ No.. ~ q. ,~~~tN~ • - ~ tnsPeCto page Ro. ` ~ • • 1. ~ ~ • - . . - ~ . . . ~P~rentlY ls 40 Probtems ~ ~~:1)e . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ j 4fj " 1 t"p I~ .s~~ . . . r ~ Ali ~~-r . . . ~ . ei U)e rl-~' r~~°0~( . • ♦ ~ ` . , M' ~5 ~ ~4•' •4`iy. •'•'X•^,j : . T ~ ca ~ ~ . . . . . • r~ ~ . S. . . . -4o ~ ~ . , . . , . , , . ( vt S 40%-Ot~ ntractor'S Rep Co . IPE PM IPE CE . Zep ~ ~ r = INLAND a PACIFlC QAtLY FIELD REPO Z~.. ` ENGINEERjNG.. . ' - - . . . . - • - . InspectoYs Oai1y Report No.: ~ oate ~ ~ . ect No.. . ~IPE Pro] Arctval Time . ~ 1070.-l , W e fio. . ea er ~ pag . a-- . oa e resentativel phone number Ctient Lo p . ~ - . . ~~s'~~~ General Con c~or t1WRepresentatlivel phone number ctor • - . IPE z ject Managerl p one numb r ` Subcontra d~..~ ~ . IPE Fie1d Represen tiva ~ Manpower & Equlpment' Used (~i~~Q~✓~ _'~,Q 44 ~ ~ G ym~ .ALd~.~~ P r ~,~1 1 ~ 'F~~•'' r.~ . ~ ~ ~ b ommen : - ' r (Work Completed Apparentiy "'trSpecificat(ons Prcbtems y~ ~ ~G ~ ~d theirSolutlons) D/4 nsP ,/Ci~ /C" ~ _/-ZP ~ . . ~t~ LV 41 ~ lis~ . ~ c i~A".( C,-,L/. - - Qs Ct 14 te ~.e G ~rr~i 7io f Q _ - iPE FtELD REPRESENTATtVE ' CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATtVE . . _ ocument and referenced addend.a are to be considered preliminary untlt reveiwed and signed by the iPE This d construction englneer andlor IPE proJect manager. ' . Date ~ Date ~ ICONbT'RUCTION ENGINEER lPE PROJECT MANAGER . , - ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: . ~ INLA►ND~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REP~~1 ~ = ENGINEERIN.G ~ - • ~ - - . ~ . . _ - - ~ . pats . ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ Inspector's Oaity Report No.: - ~ ~ - - IPE ProJect No. _ - Oage tvo. ~ ot-- ~ • . 0 " , . . . . Comments: (WorkCompletedApparently -~~2~ . ~ erS ecfflcaUons robiems ~ ~r P P ~,L,7 ~ ~ ~ P C and theirSolutions) i (afJ ~t ~ c.t. ~r` ~e~ ~ - ICJ d-VO t 2PZ 7le 5,,/ s ~'`"c v r,,-. ,l - . . w~`•~ ~ tj GL -0'G~ -/0k W,P~A • YN 1 h I YN Gc tti• 51?-0 tre kn$t►tA GZf 4itt 4'P~S 1/ di!t-'~'Td3t-, ( ( ~ ~ . ~ _ d C' ,-t.), f ; 6 u a Ooto pt vf r ~ 7-ke,.. IC)IO"It~ • . A .q~ . / A c c) e- C--n.~-e, ev 4,. --s' ~ Zetl ~ ~t ~ ~~e 1%0 l' - ' ~ Z~1.~° a(~ ~ ~ s J 1 i Z ~ ~ ~ wl~eO-Iu- 4zt, 4r.E~ , G /'cr L/e UJ Q _C . W on ~1 • ~ f . j r ' ,!:~MgO. ~ A*M, an . . . - ~1 IPE Fieid Rep IPE CE 1PE PM ~ Contractor's Rep - iNLANO ~ ~ . . ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD RE ~ O . ENGI(VEER~NG ' eltve Date 020 ~ . ~ ~ • tnspectoYs Qaity Report No.: ~ . . ~ ~ _ Atrival Time fPE Pro]ect No.: WVeatner ~age ivo.. . _oY... . ~ . ~ . Cltent t Lo I Represe tattv .p~ione number ~ . C'~ , . ~ ~ % Generai Contractor ~ Site eq sen v p~ one numper ~ Subcontractor ' • , IPE ro~ect Managy~r phone nymb r _ ~~''~--~v Gy ~'G/ ly~~'--7~ y tPE Ftetd Representative''~~ Man ower & Equtpment*Used ` ~ . . ~ t~~l~ ~ ~ r,7AA ~S ~d tY1 , f~. ~t ! ..i ~ 1 ' ~'t+~~.~~ ~ I'~/~ ~,y.c ~~v~f~ ~r~f ' . ~ ~.~(s~.~'LO~,« A • ~ 4 pi y- . : " !R Comments: ' ~ J . • ~ ' oric Ccm leted ~ f Mr p APPar+entJy ~a ~ ~ ..~r-~~'.-.~►P rSpecificatJons Problems `dthelrSoJutJons a ) ~ ~ / .~'7 I• L~'t Q d L~~~~ / i e~f++' ~°e'•` . ~ ~ eol s'~ ~'~1" ~"e+~ad ~ ,lf~ / 1Ld' ~I~J i ~ ~~-r'~ ~ i'• ' _ 4; 1''.A n o Al zzz? ~ ,,+0 ~~-I ~s ~ r?/7 ~.G~;I~ . w wf ~a r."~:.~'~...~.._ e~ 3,~ s``' O lil. L. ~lao~v /Cr. ~r ,1, • ` ' ' . . , / ~ - ~G~I. t', ~~.52~ , ? ~ • U ' ~~C~ ~.'.!o~'`~ G~~i'' / l ~3' C~ ~ - ~ . ; " i... " • ~ ~ - . .100' lPE FlELO REPRESENTA-iVE • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . • . . This document and referenced addenda are to be constdered preliminary until reveiwed end signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor,tPE proJect manager. ~ ~ ~ Date Oate I C0,ASTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER (I . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: • - i N LAN D PACiFIC . . DA! LY FI ELD RER~~~~" 4Miw:ENGINEERIN.G-- Inspector"s Daliy Report No.: Date tPE Project No. page [vo. ot--- - • . . ~ Comments: 77A LI-A e s z. &v, ~ . (WotkCompleted ApparenUy perSpectflaatiocls,Probtems C~PA "l" ~ - ~f ~u ~i~d}•~ q 1,7 r and theirSotutlcns) • / ' 7'& . 4- jr~ ~T~,~►rGri,lCY ~G 7 ~ ~ , . . x-7 /7..'. ,Oe-(~- - ~ ~ ~h.,r . + • ~ r ~ ~i( ~ /;~rl~ 17144000 ~~•r.".e ~ w r ~ • ~ I~Il1~'~~1~~+~, / / , . . ~ . . o' ` ~ .r~ . ~P ,Gr ~ i~~ /j1/ vr ~jt~tr~` ~i~/;~.-r~~..~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ' y•~/~ ' /''j~~ ~ ~ c ~ ~iV - , .`1i~~~~~~ , y► G r~tat. ..c~ W ~ ~ s''`~ ~'~'r~e ~"OL- . ' " . ~z . , IPE Freld Rep !PE CE iPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ INLAND ~ PACIFIC QAILY FIELD REPO, , ENGI(VEERING. . _ . • . : T . ~ . - . . . . ~/`e . . ~ . . . . . Oate ~ - tnspectoYs Qatly Report No.s _ S~ T ~ Arrtval Time IPE ProJect No.: ~ we--aTher ~ ~ . _ . . j. ~ . . 1 - rage ivo., A ~ Cllent . ~ . Lwt Repres ntatlv~ phone number ~t ~~^C • ' ~r-1~. General Contmctor mro-Repnesenia-uvel phone numper Subcontractor tPE ProJect Manager/ phonJ nu er ~ ~ a(q r~• IPE Ffefd Representative .7, C~~1•'At.f" ' w ~/'~t~ ~~~"t.~ I ~ _!""P . Man ower & Equipment Used I-A .~►i -e~~"..~ . r ~.,,.3 t c~ ~ r~~' ,r ~ ~ ~:J~ ~ . , Comments: ~9 ~ ~ ~ .5~~ 1..~ V .l \..r ,~•V ' ~✓l (WorkCompleted Apparently Q t Gm <'I ~,r- rSpeclficatJons Pr+oblems • , ~ ~ thelr Solutions) ' d ~ ' • C~ r.--r ~ ~ .a1~ ~ . t kA ~ . . . ` ✓ ~ . . ~ ~ ~f ~,c .h° G' r.` ' t~ r ~ . t~P.~~"-~`. j, << Ze4gA'to • _ ~ ~ . / .r . / • ~ ,~.e~ ` A` t fJ rh r~~`~•t.''''~ ~G~ L1 `V~~. ~ ~I vn / _ 't~ ;f~ ~-J r -~q l. ~ e' r . • , - J • - ~ j c l / r ~I~ "'7 ~~l ~ ~ / .~7 • 7~ +f ~r , %K.~ I , ~ ~ B. ' ~ ~f f IC ✓ !3 ~ ~ ~ i/~. ♦ ~ • . ~ i _ CZ~ ~.i ~Y ~ ~ ~ {~.n • ~ . ~ j~ c , ~ • , , ' = . - IPE FIELD REPRES IVE- • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . This document and referenced addenda are to be consldered prellminary untll reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructton engineer andlor,iPE proJect manager. • ~ Date , . ~ Date ~ I E C~~ISTRUCTION ENGINEER lPE PROJECT MANAGER V` . , Corresponding Defictency Report No: • ~ ~ CiFIC ~ . . DA1LY FIELD REP~~~' PA - . im:ENGINEERIN.G* INLAND t ~ ~ • ~ . - . _ ~ . •M~t ~ ~ - inspectoes Oaity Report No.: r Oate IPE PnoJect No. Page Ko. r i ~a/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Comments. . 0 ~ . . ~,VlioritCompleted ApparenUy r. • pecSpecfilcatlons,Problems ~~t ~ "'~~~'~-lcA and thelrSoluttons) ~ • . ~ . ~ Z/O Ae kle,-t ee ~s ~ JCi ,l1 e • f. ~ 4'ace -iA - ~ I ►~r ~ . ~ ~p a,~ ~ t x ~ ~ . SD j 7-- r~' ►~.-•l TD oo"l~ _IA~ r' a loI- n r - ✓ ~'~G' ~~o . . , ~t.~ ~ ~ - ~ . r . .A' ' ~..t .C~ { ica~.+.~ ~ ~ • ~~'T/ 4.f~ t~ r~~.'~ ~ rV rV/~ ~a • r ~ ~ , f JY`: • - { ~ . . 14 r - ~r' L~L.~ `~4'-~~-3L~' L.Z.~ ~i+ .1,~ . f a/'`rt`~.s~. ~ 1 on ~ ~ ~r~-U~~ _ 'E~~ . sin ~ ~ . . ~ J~l ~ • ~ • ~ • ~7/ /.F~~l ~ ~ h i. ~i ~ ~~i/ iN r--./ . ~ . ~C~1 tivt ~.~4! C~ : ~S'''` ~ ~ ~ li~. Ui.G~ Gt S ~'~°9'~.t ~ r r ~rl ~t R~G ~t.•~vt.~ ~'-uv~t ~ ~C~ ~ . ~ ° IPE Fieid Rep IPE CE IPE PM ~ Contractor's Rep ~ INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD 8 ENGI(VEERJ(VG REPO . . . . . . j ' IIZ.. . Oate lnspectoes Oaity Report No.: '?0 a Z/O i ~Av Arriva['fime ~ / IPE Project No.: q - , e?" 0_0 -oy.--*- ea1her . . ~ iage ~io.. ~ ~ c;2.. . . . Ctient ,oe~, l.oaa! Representative! p one number ~ R " o c.t y . ~ . Generai Contractor y ep en v p~ one number ~ Subcontractor i• . IPE ProJect Managerl- ~~p hone n~ be ~ OA''~ IPE ftetd Representatlve Ma ower & Equtpment*Used {,i -29rP~-.~tn_~. .,~.Alc~ke 146 - - ~ ~ ~ o47 ~0$14 Comments: _ LWorfc Completed Appar+ently . ~~1Z~ 6,~ ~ erSpecificatlons Problems , • _ id thelr Solutlons) nn Cr.~ o ~ J`.~iC ~ /~G.%a' L°._ l-G/'-~ y~ ~ d ti~ f` ~a f.}° ~i~ .fC t" t:•,I~'~'I ~G~l. ~ • ~~y~-~f~' ^ ~r{..t'' .~.5..1~'L,.-~' ' ~,p f 40 'oe V • ~ ~ , 1747- /7. Gl" ,GJ ~ ~17~j' /'~~fi' y•l'/"~° ~ ~P. 4~j //0 ! _ . ' . ✓-'"f.~.... ~ tPE FlELD REPRESEN~'~ATIVE • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATlVE . . , . . This document and referenced addenda are to be considered prellminary unt11 reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer ancUor,tPE proJect manager. • . , ~ f f Date Date I~ CO STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT (VIANAGER U , _ . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ • - . i INLANO : ~ . .t PA~IFIC DAILY FIELD RER~~~' . . - ENGINEERIN.G• • ~ ~ . " ~ . - ~ . . Oate Inspector's Oaily Report No.: ~ IPE ProJect No. ~'age rYo. - o~--- - - . . Comments: (VltorkCompletedApparentiy • / ~ • perSpectficatlons)Problems and thelrSoluttons) • 41illIe'A - /l4,~r 1 ~i ~ ' . ta r- ~l.~, t~~'~ . . ~ AS-0 X 6.,) ~ f . . . , U/" ' . ~ ~ (dw- Pc" - ~ - ~r 1 c'~.~ t.( J / ✓i ~-1/li ~ c /~ic~ -;~.r /~i ~ 6~" v , ..,r,~ - G~ ~ ~ ~i? f _ S.~ G~~,~a F~ r~' ' ~d `2 cf~ c~~y`'~ / ~ d~ ~ / LV . , Non•Conforming Items: ~ ~ • . ~ ' (PmJectorStandardSpecfficatlon Observed Constructton Is In Non-Compllancewith) - ~ - • . A . IPE Field Rep !PE CE IPE PM • Contractor's Rep t N LAND . PACiFtC ~ DAILY FIELD RFTOI 0 ~ . ENGiNEERlNG. ~ ~ - . . . . Oate . ~ . • _ tnspectoYs Daiiy Report No.: ~3~ 1 f~ r- rr . . Arrivai Time ~ - IPE ProJect No.: _ _ ea er Page ~o.. . ot Cltent Looat Representativel p~ione num er Ge nera Contrac r ;are s v p~ orte umber Subcontractor . ~ IPZP,?eManage / phone nu ber tPE Fteld Representa ve . ~ - - - . Ma ower & EquipmentUsed ~f , r~~~fn ~ Comments: (Wocft Completed Apparently ;rSpec[ficattons Pc+obiems . ~ ~:d their Solutlans) ~ n • it j~~l'~ Q~ ~ - . ~~~Ale4-e . ~ * /Zr . ` e • ' ' C~ ~ ~ f ~ • r ' . , !PE FIELD REPRESENTATl17E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE - . , . - . . Thts document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminaty unUt revetwed and signed by the iPE construction engineer an or~IPE proSect manager. • r Date Oate q;PVC O T R CTfON ENGINEER . lPE PROJECT tV1ANAGER . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ; - = L~ "IM INLAND ~ PACIFtC DAILY FIELD REP~?-*T ra EN,GINEERtN.G ~ . - . ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ pats InspectAes Daily Fteport No.: IPE Project No. . ~ Oage ko. ot--- _ , . _ . . , . Comments: . 14-1~ orkCo leted ac+enU ~ • ~ ~ - pe SpeccaUoris~ro6lems and theirSoluttons? . . . , ~ ~ •r~- - :f_ - ~ ~ ,r G_~ . . . . ~ . 6i ~ ~ r~ e - , Z/u.-~,,~ ~ , ~ ~~r~c. ~ r r~s ~ ~~i, . , _24 ~ r . . d • . . CA, cx- . . ~ Z2V,li p~~ Gl F~` . . ` ;00^ , - - ~ .o i. _ , 00,,sse~u.r.S._ . ~ .!':c.~~ L~.~f~ ~ ~ ,y►: s'-P G~ . A 0. 6 OOOP~ . . ~~--oz (7>' /o- Zot~7/c-,e • ~ ~ _ p ~ " - ~ ~q~~ b•c / /2~~ ~ 6 f..! 6e-fI-A-4t. /0 4 0~, IPE Fiald Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ ~ INLANo PACIFIC - DAILY FIELD REP. ~ - ew ENGINEEf21N.G • ~ ~ • . . ~ . . _ . . . Oate . ~ • ' ~ ~ tnspectoc"s Oaity Report No.: V ~ ~ IPE ProJect No. ` - ~ ~ • - page tto. 1. , . ~ ~ . Comments: d (VYorfcCompletsdApparenti - : - pecSpecfficaUons)Probiems *109 andtheirSoiutlons) e- ' 'l ..•~9~~° O ~ _ c~ ~ 7~~~r " ~ ~ ' . ~ ~`ze 0 • s 07 n e, ~1 ~ _ /.~'P'.i f~,~ r.,~ ~ ~ f'~''~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f e- Or ~ . Non-Conforming Items: ~ • ' ~ (ProJectorStandaniSpecfflcatlon ~ _ . ~ Observed Construcdon is In ~ ~ • ~ Non-Campltance with) ~ • ~ • , . . . 5..11~-~ . " ~ ' r • ~ IPE Frald Rep IPE CE IPE PM ~ Contractor's Rep . ~ t~ - ''UNtNL.AND " . ~ . PACIFtC DAILY FlELD REPE ~ ENGI(VEERlNG. . . ~ ~ - . . . . . - • - - InspectoYs Oatly Report No.s oate a.:. W`7 • . Arrtvai Time IPE Project No.: ~ ra9e ~vo.. ~ • . -o~r.. . , . ea er - • • . ~ . Client Looat R presentativel P ho e numbO . . Genera Contrac 9.1 e epres t v p~ one number Subcontractor • lPE Project Mana erl phone n mbfe % , ~f 1PE Fle{d Representative , ~ O G~ ,.~~~~~~~.~4~..J ~ ~ . ~ ~ Man ower & Equlpment~Used ~~',~-a - ~ P - _2 ~ 4 Z;~-44o~,~ . Comments: MlockCompletedApparentty,~(4~-j 1 ~ ecSpeeificatlons Probtems ",nd thelrSoiutlons) t ~ ~ ~ /t l`~+ , ~ .^1 ~ ~ Ar - ~ia ?l~!L~ ~ ~ . - . . ✓ c~c~ ~-o ~ . ~ . ~ a~ ~ . "oolt-7 Q ±52 ~d. Yt 'T1VE IPE FtELO REPRESENTA'~' E - CONTRACTOR S REPRESENTA This docurnent and referenced addenda are to be consldered prellmtnary unt11 reveiwed and sjgned by the iPE . . constructlon engine r anctfor-tPE proJect manager. Date Oate ~ J IPE r NSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PRfJJECT MANAGER ~ Corresponding- Deficiency Report No: ~ ~ ~ , ~ '"MlINLANO ~aa PACiFIC DAtLY FIELD REP:'~' . . . . ~ ENGINEEftIN.G : - • . . . - . ~ _ _ Oate ~ ~i ~ • ~ ~ ~ Inspectoes Oally Report No.: r- ~S IPE Project No. ~ • . ~ . Page 't-io. of-- - . . ~ Comments: ~ - (VYotkComp(eted Apparentfy . perSpecfticatJons,Problems andtheirSotutlons) i cLT~ ,r L:ZW- Q,;pc ki rv . • ~'SLS ~5~1 • 65 0 S G, ! .f l,•t,,r~' ~ ~ L~ t~'.. ~ ~rj~~ Q ~i /f ~~'S / d~-•', f / /'~P..t~~~~.~~_C~ . , . ~ . , . ,Q ,~i~l._ ~ Pr..~! c° P` .G~1 ~ l V t ~~~~"~t Z-3 j ~ ~dYL.•':"~t-C%~0~~~ ~ f~'P~. Q ~ ~G~ r ~ ' ~ o 1~s (e-- 10 Yb .f` Ile- Non-Confonnlng ~ r1 or~ Items: ' • ' ~ (ProJectorStandarciSpecfflcatlon ~ • ~ Observed Construction is in ~ ~ _ • NorrComp{iance with) • ~ • . _ • ~ ~ ' • . IPE Fra-id Rep IPE CE IP~ PM Contractor's Rep ? 77-` - . ePa~ ` . . . _ . ✓L _ . . _ _ or~. y S..Gy ~ _ . •1/I; s s. o ~it ~ • 4 ~ d/ n - • ~ - _ r}'~-°r,~ ..3 ~ ~ -T-O ~ o- ~ i~ i 1~~ f-e~ G ~ ~ o?, ~ O ~ ~ .'3. ~ ~L~ 6~'• G ~ - ~ . . ~ o,oo' ~ . - c►~ t I~~~J~'E'~'~ . ~ d►.C ~~r o-t~. . s ~ ~ ' , . . a • . . 8 . ~ . ~ r►~~ C~ EL• 3• !~'f' l~ p c~ ►°i 6'-e T~ P;~ , . 7~ E tz 7ar402 ~P-ee ~ CC ) ~ L~ 7• ~ f'1/f i rS~o ~ , 1 a I ♦ ~ ~ eS~•' Tb~a Thl' ~ ~ - ; ``im INLAND PACIFIC oAtLY FIELo REPE . ENGINEER~~G , . ~ ~ ~ pa~ - ~ - tnspectoYs Daily Report No.: . . . . `Z,~ Arrival Time IPE Project No.: ~ ~age hio. ea er - ` ~ , _ " 70S - ~ . . . Client ~ . - - Lo 1 RepresentatIvel phone number ,74 ~ A none number General Go~rac;~r e ep sen p Subcontractor . • . `iPE P ect ManagJ phone n b r -'o,4 . . 1 IPE Fteld Representative_ Man ower & E uipment"Used - , ~ ~/n • ~P~.a.. • ~ .d~fd a~.. r~ ~ ~ /`?~..~:.1~~ ~ ~ r -~i ~ y~~ ~i?~~- ~6~-~ I/i,a f'i ~ ~y ~~~;.~-a►~~'~ - , Comments: ~ 4hfotkCcmptetedApparentty ~~e 4 O o, ~ erSpeoificattons Problems . ~q nd thelr Solutlonsj J, itis &I"d l.~G./~ ai!~L-zm/f • ' _ ~ Cv /14r G. 0-10Li. 17A- s .Se , , J7 tPE FIELD REPRESENTATI,E • ~ CONTRACTOR`S REPRESENTATIVE ' ~ • This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untit reveiwed and signed by the tPE constrvcUon engtneer a, or*IPE proJect manager. Date Oate ~ . . , ~ • V~ , ' ,~o~,• ~ ~ - ~ f ~i' , " t ~C066TRUCTtON ENGINEER ~ d lPE PROJECT IVIANAGER ~ , . Corresponding Defictency Report No: ~ , _9M INLAND • PACiFIC DAILY FIELD REP~.~~ ENGlNEERfN.G• , ' • ~ ~ tnspeotor"s Oatty Report No.: oate . 0-7~,' tPE ProJect No. page nta \~-~r■ ; • • ~•y Comments: r- erl~ T~~t... ~aKIEIA.: (WotkCompleted 14pparently • / perSpectttcatlons)Probtems .~1`~.r,~.,. D~ °4'~g4'~y a. L2./~' /1,~ ~✓~?'r,~~L and thelrSolutlons) ~ . ~ l4e. o:4.~ . - j . V-- . ~ ~ . Non•Conforming ttems: ~ - , _ . ~ . (PmjectorStandarYlSpecffication . . . ~ , Observed Constructton Is in . Nart-Compliancewith) - . ' . • , ~ - • : ~ • . r . IPE FiaId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep t'~ lNLAND . ~ PACIFIC : . DAtLY FtELO R. E ~ . . E~ ENGtNEERJNG : • ~ . . . . . . . Oate InspectoYs Oaily Report No.: ~ - Arrival 'Time IPE Project No:: ea er t,. rage ivo.. -or. . ~'-C~~_ . ~~s _ ' - hone number . Cllent Looat epr~esentatlve! p GTC~ 1' . . ~ -~enerai Contrac~o~- ~ ~ep en t v p one numaer Subcontractor IPE roJect Mber ~A /~►j ~-r1A.~ ~hk iPE Fteld Re resentatlve - - p o oe- Mnanp wer & Equlpment'Used ~ a Gb ,,t / . r ~ ~itd`C ~ " Lf /~o ~/'!~!d rGl ~/~*p' f , ~LcJ'6~ 1Y~ 7r K! . c~ ~ ~ ' . omments: (Wotit Completed Apparently 'PlIa D-,b .s ~ ~ C erSpeclfcaUons Problems thelr Sotutlons) ~a ~~7 -P a ~ ~ . .C ZZ &Ve I• K.-4 r• t Y',! M VC hL \J/ Y1 ~K~~. M~ J~~LYI./SIV • 1 • . ~ ~ ( 6 O-r,. e! ~ . - N . *4 ~ u acr. ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . , . Thts document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untll revetwed and signed by the IPE constructton engineer ndlor*IPE project manager. - Date ; Date Y.... - - , _ r I E CeSTRUCTION ENGINEER lPE PROJECT MANAGER 0 Corresponding Oeficiency Report No; ~ , - ~ -"W 1NLAND : • PACjFIc - oAILY. FtEl.o REP~~'~ % ~ I ENGINEERtN.Gs - ~ - . . _ ~ Oate . • ~ ~ Inspectoes Oaify Report No.: S 7 tPE Project No. t'age Ho. ~ ot--- ~ ~ ~ Comments: (WockCompietedAppacantty ~ pecSpecMcatlons,Problems Lt andthelrSotuttons) ~ e ~6 - " ~ . . ~e_. cvoue r- . . ~ - - - . ; . ~ - . . . Pro ec o Eaifloatlon . . . AmAGQnstru.cL(s Tn' . NeroGcsmpli$ttce"ttfi) " r". . . . _ ~ • ~ • ' . . ~ ' ~ ~ d~-'t~'~ ' 'r~~ 3 • IPE Fieid Rep (PE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep - "UNtNLAND PACIFIC DA1LY FIELD REPO ENGt~IEERJNG, r . . ~ ~ DaEe tnspectoYs Datty Report No.: - <:;2 ~ Arrival 'fime IPE Project No.: ~ ~ \„J`JY _ _ . . . • . ea er rage ito.. _ -or- . Client Loaa! RepmsentaUvel phohe numbef General Contrac r e epnese h 6WP/f~one number -ri Subcontractor . • . IPE~ ,roJect Managerl phone num er IPE Fleld Representattve i~~ ~H1~~'S► Manpower & Equipment'Used j ~ ` 'l.v.l. L a, / ~ r;2 4AZ6:14-~1 ~ ..1 CA-1'.. &Fbl A Comments: '4Yorlc Completsd Apparently _,a.2Q. Cld cSpectfcatlons Problems thelrSolutlons) ~ ~L~ l~ h ~ ~ ~~,o j'' P1,c.~ ~ a!~t ~ f rd ~ Lu ~ ' rr- S c~•~ ~1'~ t~ //!~1~ J1~ ~ ;y~!,~-~ ~ ~1'~ • _ ~^'j _ . ~ ~l. . . . . xl~ ~ E FIELD REPRESENTielVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . . Thfs document and referenced addenda are to be consldered preliminary untll reveiwed and signed by the tPE construction engineer ndlor'IPE project manager. ~ • ~ Date Date ~ t I I~~E CaS RUCTION ENGiNEER lPE PROJECT NIANAGER t • _ _ ~ ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ ' ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 0-- 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: October 11, 1996 Spokane, WA 99260 • - I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th Description - r~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents Work Authorization M X~ Report M ~ No. Copies Description , 1 Dailv Inspection Reports #39 dated 10-5-96. PUI-pOSe . M XI Information M~ Review & Comments MI Per Your Request Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks . ~ ~ . signed: - D~ouQ irch, Pacific Proaerties . D:NTRNSMr PMS - i 'NO itvLANO PACIFIC . . oA{ LY Ff ELa REK I ENGINEERJ(VG. , . . . . . . ~ . . . j~jl~i/~' Oate . • tnspecEoYs Oatty Report No.: - Arrlvai T1me IPE ProJect No.: - . : ~•r - . ~ " . , - . • ` VQea[her pa90 NO.. . 3 . . Cllent . , . Looal epresentattvet pfione number . • • . U- G ' General contrac~,or~, ~ s e ep n v pf one number ~Sd~t Subcontractoc • iPE P%Wect jVlanager~l one num er IPE Field Representattve .~---Ta /4 i(a Manpower & Equlpmerd'Used . v~ ~ ~2v ~.r~. • , • Comments. (Wock Completed Appar+enUy perSpecificatlons Problems . ' ~ and thelr Sotutlons) ,.V/) t,* f ' ~-A. dP r v . • ~ Ll S / tc . i~~Ll.-r lZ -J4/ ~ ~•CF//~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i~i° ~/S7/~ ~O L~ i~~:-r~' _ ~ • ' ~ ~ J • 1,4 . ~ - . ✓ • i!s~/' ~ f/!1 ~'/./r_ `J ~ G~/~iI" ~ ~ / CA /~-t / 1 ~ ~ G~Ta~ . . , ~ ..3 . - . . ' ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVd' • -CONTRACTOR`S REPRESENTATIVE . . , • This document and referenced addenda are to be considered pretiminary untll reveiwed end signed by the IPE constructton enginoer.. ndlor'{PE proJect manager. • , : Date ~ Oate w 1PE C'4NS RUCTiON ENGfNEER IPE PROJECT IiAANAGER V , . ~ CorresPonding DeficlencY Report No: ~ INLAND PaCIFIC ~ DAILY FIELO REP~3~v ~ ENGINEERIN.G• ~ - Date Inspector's Oaity Report No.: ~ - ~ X. IPE Project No. . ~ Page No. ~ ~ o~--- . . Comments: /tz . (YYoric Compietsd Apparentty • pgrSpectficat(ons,Prob(ems t• j ~p: . aadthetrSolutJons) - . ✓1 Q Ow Y 17 . a 0 "1 , ~ . / ' -,r' c .s•P, , ~ • ~ .`s~.. ' D U'e. Gr uJ e e" d yo" Cj Gc.► ~1 A Aa / v- Q? S A0 A ' ,L,, , • ~Z_ t . ~ . ~ . ~ , eoo;~x X4 ~ e,; I?~I 'f' . Al t~':'? t C~' ~ i✓" P ~t 5 /l 1 ~ . •-l=,... a ~/O 4a lee /.3e5 /t:;? 5-~- fa C~,,°~Z. -c , v - G~ , ~ • Non•Conforming Items: " • ' ~ (ProJectorStandacdSpecfflcatlon Observed Constructton Is tn Non-Compitancewith) ~ ~ - . . ~ . , ~ . ° !PE FieId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ 1.~~ . A . . . . - . _ , r ~C.(~~~ ~ ~'eU~S . . ~ ~ rvj o 6,Are~~ ~ _ . .t~ ~ . . ~ . ~ - . . - ~ . . i s C ~cci ~ .r- . - ' ~ / - . ~ . Y~- ~ . ~ ~ . . 4 ~,~/l d ~ Csf t~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y~• ~ ~ Lt,-~~j" - i . j ~ ~ ( KJ ~ r~ .-r ' ev . 7 ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY ~ 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: October 18, 1996 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th Description , - . . _ ~ N~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter Original Drawing MI Contract Documents Work Authorization M XI Report M~ No. Copies Description . 1 Daily Inspection Reports #40 through #42 _ coverinQ the veriod 9-30-96 throuQh 10-2-96:1 LA PLIIpOSe M XI Information M~ Review & Comments . M ~ Per Your Request MI Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~Remarks ~ • ,igned CC: Dou ' q D.\TRNSMT.PMS r,~. . tim I N LAN D PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPC ~ ENGI(VEERINC . . . . . . . . . - • C-' Date inspectoYs Daity Report No.: ~ Arrtvat Time ~ 1PE Project No.: o ea er ra8e tvo.. 01r. ~ Ya 22~ . Client . . . . l.oaal pregentativeJ phone number ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~'e -C General Contractor e epre n ve! phone number Subcontractor . • . IPE ProJect Manage phone nu~bgr IPE Fte1d Representative c ?o Ma wer & Equipment*Used zz_ f4 r~ - 7✓; ~ ~-~f-,; ~ l~-:✓~,~:~ , /~:i~c~ ~-r ~r,.~~~~~ . ~•!J( sr' ~~j~ /~'t. ~ f1 x2, r Comments: _'''YorSc Completed Apparently erSpecificat(ons Probtems ~ 1000 ~ ~nd thelr Solutlons) ~4 tlr .~~~t~ y' .a.• ~.~y~..~ r'"r,.~_. ~ ,,S Gr . r.s ~i.~t~t.r.~°~ ~ • . / . . s' ~ 1 r i ~ -0. ~t.•c.,- ♦ i~1 7 ' • / ~ _ _ , ~ wf~~. ?0, X' . -011f ~ . . , ` ~ a. . ~ ti C~ ' CJ~ r~.► f ` ~ ~`1 ; t, ~ . _>.~'~-'v~,- f~ ~ ~ ~ C~ .+'~f ' a n g . . e1.. .t...e ' . . ~ ~ . .t . - IPE FIELD REPRESENTA VE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . . . This document and referenced addenda are to be consldered preiiminary untll reveiwed and signed by the fPE construction engjnee andlor*IPE project manager, • ~ - , f~ y_~-... ~ Oate ~ Date 'r~ 10E C,~NSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT (VfANAGER 1 ~ ' - - Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ tNLANO PAOIFIC DAILY FtELD REP.~.-T ~ ENGINEM1N.G • Inspectot's Oaily Report No.: Oate . e.d , ot-- - 1PE'Project No. j . : . ~ page Ko. D a , Comments• . (WorkCompietedApparently / ~ • • ~ arSpecfficatlons,Probiems and their Saiutions) ~ ~r' ,~r ~ /~~.3 ~~1 d~~,~ . ~1 T~.. ,~'w•,Fi q /'~:c _r~ a •1-r . . , ~ - . .,r 5 ~/P~ ~ s~~ ~ -~j►~- ~ . - ~ 1,~ . / /.-e_. ~i~ ' ~ ~r ~ r:~ ~ r~/! ~L~ I, !r . r..* ~r.'. ~ I o i~ tr~Q - r _ i ✓ ~ . -or ~ f, //t/ ~ /.i G/ ~t~ 1 P t..~ r* i•~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~..r .b el, ~ 7 Zl'lo, ~ . . ' ~ Non•Conforrning Items: ~ ~ , • . . (ProJectorStandardSpecffication ~ . . . , Observed ConsttuctJon is in Non-Ccmpltancewlth) - . " . , ~ ' • ~ • ' . ~ . , t .7 . tPE F,a-ld Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep . itz 1NLAND PACIFic . DAILY FIELo REPc 11 ENGINEER~NG, . . . . . y~ Oate ~ ~ - tnspect,oYs Daity Report No.: ~ ~ Arrival Time tPE Project No.: Awe _ ea page flo.. / . o . l~°C~ P~ • ~!3 _ ~ - . Client Loaal Representatlvel phone umbee General ntr•ac r ~ e eprese M v p one number ~ ~~~~c✓ . Subcontractor . r• IPE ProJect Managerl phone umber IPE Fleld Representattve ~ Manp wer & Equipment'Used / ? ~'1 ` ~~'~~..~•~xl~ ~ X .~1.~ r~"~'.• ~ 4, t.1..0 ~ .i 1• ~ / ~0 ` ~ ~ Ct (.i-F./l~ r ~ ~Q .C_• . ~ ~ /J /~'4`~. l1 ~f' c.,rl.I',~ ~ t,/i'7 r: f~/9 L!~ I~ S . Comments: / / (Work Completed Appar+entiy f..~ ~'..,a S ~'_'.✓f_~`~ pecSpecificatlons Problems Xr and t heIr Solutlons ) r l ( l G, ~-~P_ ~ ~ ~`U^~ d- ~ , ~~7t~. ~ ~~'~t~.✓ t.r J ~ E''X. ~d 1v . ~ ' ~ x e,.~ e•! ~ r4- 5 - ~ ~ sW , ~ ~~c~- rr~ .5roga 0-,df x~ ~ 4 X6 r 7Z,( 06w Pa!'.r-6 oA 4,-skinei /J ~ • da ~i? A+t ~~1 _t-/ 11~"' ~ ~ ~ ~ a .i' , ~r ~ ~ C / . /G~ ~ _ f J , f♦ . ~ C; ~l'~ . r! 'Qr~ ~i ~ r_,..~` ~'"~.s ~„~.r.~ ~ _J/ G~ ~ ~1.. / ~ P"/ v !PE FlELD REPRESENTATWE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTAT(VE . . , . Thls document and referenced addenda are to be cons(dered preliminary untll reveiwed and signed by the IPE construcUon engineer ati o-IPE project manager. • - ~ ~ ' Oate ~ ~ - Date 23.-.~ f0,P~00i$TRUCTION ENGINEER lPE PROJECT IVfANAGER m , (f Corresponding Defic(ency Report No: r INLANo pAILY FtELD REP ~ PACtFiC : . . ~ j %L- . - . ENGINEERiN.G•. . ~ ~ . em: ~~r~ 1 . . T'. ~ . . . • ~ " oate tnspector's Oa11y Report No.: ~ ~ C • ' . ' page Ko. ~ ot-- !PE ProJect No. , 10, Comments: (VYorkCompletedApparently psrSpecitiaatlons,Probtems and thelrSolutlons) n n C, -•1- • t ' ' ~S"'7i! ( ~/,I ~2x ~ ~~c',y''~ I" ~ t _;7" 0 ' ~ ~ • ~ - ~ . / ) ~~3- ~~r C~'l...c,r'~~ -•'`.~,1 • 1 . t /j~~ t• ` j ~ 7v . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ G 0& ~ z>~~►~ -9 1 ~ • / ~ ~ / • ~ ~C ~ ~ F ~ ' . V ~~/I~~ ~ ~ / ~ .4-6o~ b~ ~ r ~ ? f .t"r .~~,t ~ ~ t~ ~.~t ~ ~ p, ~ • / E ~ , /-t4 ~1, . ~ . f~ ' ~ ~ - . ~ ,~c~ ~~..s-~-~,~t.._ r ` - on L~L"11 ~ - . !m / ~ e) ~ ~ ~ l 4.• ~'~~`',r? s~''~ f.-~2,1 ~%t~~ . ~ , ~ - . ~ Y ~ . I . 6~ ' • . • o ` • ~ ) • IPE F,ald Rep IPE CE iPE PM Contractor's Rep . . _ . ~ - ~ . . . . . _ _ . . . . . . ~ • - _ . _ --_.---~~y~~~; . ' ' • - • - ' _ . . ~ ~ L ~ t ~ y 1-----'___-__._ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ - . - . , ~ ~ . .~-i------. i ~S-~/~ l . . _ . G~ ' ~ _ _ ~ . . _ - ~ - _ ' L -a-„ g ~ 7_~; - ~ ~ r~- . ~ S 31 ~ AeJ • C r~~ ~S''~ ll I~i:` 1i1.- ~ . _ _ , nof ~ ~ p9 w N 1'~ ~ d~~ ~n - ~ ~ o ~ . ~r epoo' INLAND PACIFlC DAILY FtELD REPC ~ ENGINEER~NG, . • / . . . . , f . i . •S . . ~ • • / ~ L • _ • Oate tnspectoYs Daily Report No.: _ Arrlval Ttme - !r IPE Project No.: ~ . . . - ea er page I~o.. ~ - . Client . , . l.oaalRepresentat1ve! pho e number Genecal Contrac ~ Mro-Ttepresen v p.one numaer Subcontractor " lPE P ject Manager hone number / /drT r{r,t.,~ - le.~.~'~~ •.~~t' _ IPE Fleld Representatlve Manpower & Equipment'Used A7 ~ -~u~CY,!?.~.d..~ ~~,rizsa~ /S /"r-.~t-~~~► ~ - d~ q ^ ` 7 f r~_.~~,~~~~ r , Comments: Work Campfeted AAparently _,~~~Q ~S/~G_° ?0 ~ .S !0"tJ`Cf ~ erSpecificatlons Problems . nd their Sotutions) ,~~.~~p ~~1 L~ / ~'~c'~? c_.-°.t,~" ~~,,Y ~ rs ,✓'r ~ ~ ~~1~2.,/~'" /D ~~,1 E~.✓~~E_'.,.~fC'_ .~if/'i ~l ~ ~ _!Y ' e Z4 -F e 3 f'o Z 8 ~ e ~ . f4. jt44 r . , . . . ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . - . . . . _ . IPE FIELO REPRESENTATIV~E~ • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE ' • . This document and ceferenced addend.a are to be consldered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructlon engineer l dlor,tPE proJect manager. • _ Date Date • ` E{~ ~ ~ " • . 1P`E COIUSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT tNANAGER V • ~ ~ - Corresponding Deficiency Report No: I Y ' ~ , . , . A~LY F~ELp RG D , ' • ) . ~ , T• ND - t~ r{ o+rt InsP ~o.' . Q~rs patty ~ep ~ ~ - e ~ p~,~;1FIG : - _ • ~ , . - at--- - . . agel'`` p• • EN . ~ ~ ~l . . . ~ u S: ~ ~ eCt tAo. , . - A w P~ pr'0'I . 4=j4 en'ts, • cOmm tYNcckCOM,VjletadApP 'Uonsyc'°btems SPecUt er tutlons~ ~ 465 r•~'-- ~ ~ - r-tG+ Xk~ . . ~ ~ c- ~ . l ~,f ~1~ ~ ~2~ , . • sot . ~ r.44J . . ~ ~ ~ . 0.~ . . ~ n . ~ ~ • , ~ ;~t ~ ~l3~,v~ . . r , • - ,~a'' • . • ' ' _i " ~ . -t-~ . . S Rep Contmotor IPE PM • . 1PE CE . . iPF F~~rld Rep . 4 ~ ♦ ' 1 0 ~ ~-A 41f~ I , • . ~4 . cA ~ • . ~ ~ ~ ' O . .r VE j~LE oE~.sa CuR ~ YANGENT ~ CNO~a .56' 29 47,~ LENG'fN gg.52 9 b~ 9tYO~ 3~,, t pptUS ~ 134.03' - 20,00' 2a~8 56' 250, 31 's1~ ' 20.24' 33 20.w 35 . ~ ~ 3~ AY gACK OF CURB • ` ' S v M ~R 6 Pbt~a I . t~, -6,, ~ . , ~ ~ . ~ j : ~ ~ ~ ~9 ``S 1.ie.•. c \ ~1 70.00' ~ 1' 00 ' ~ , 70. 2 4+Lp,NE ~ z +72.e0 ' ~ 43 BAI.DWIN R-50 . / ~ i , ~ F f$Q+1ENT 70,01' , f ~ , 1Q~ ~ aw C.1i %..56.44~ -E ~lll.tn ' F• ' j~ - + ~,SE~.,.. oe~~ 12 11 i ► ~ ~ ' ~x » \ , 4,. 1 3 ~ POND U TRACT A 2 c i . ~Aqp i ~ ' \ • I ~'f,~~ ^ //~i / i 04 ~ ~ . 4 , ~cTioN No1ES . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~NSTR IN PER SPOKPNE ~ SIGN ~ l~.l- , S~ ~►,r N. ~ . f~ ~ . • , . ~ . ~ ~ • ' ' ~ . 50 SEE IWERSECTION DETAIL • Z ' ' . I ~ II ~ W z 5 POND Q , W ~ SEE TRANSmON DETAI ~ , , ; 11 , C ~ ~ ) I II > 10 UTIl11Y EASEMENT- • . ~i~, ~ Y I Q I ~ ~ nl Z 1 ~F ~ II Q ~ -f----- I cJ ~ I ~ z s~ ~ 37.~- 7,.~'-, 7,.~ 71. 7,.~ »,o~ r ~ 25 V 9 26. ~ p~ , O Z------- , 26 ; 0 N29'S9'43'W N ~~R (.~lE~ Q 2e+83.94 I 90.16' ~ m ~ 49.84" • 70.14 ~'r'7 V g / ~ • L~:'~ _ ~ ~ ~ Z~ - 14 - ~ 3 Z 2 1 . r ~ l1J' lL . : ) < POND W, ~~J ~ ~ I Q Z L L Icz ~ I I.. ~ ~F-I II : 10 i~. 4 P ND RT 27+16.45(SALA~ION RNER LANE)- • , ~ ~ 40+00(eALowiN tMe) ~ PLAT BOUNDARY • r~ ! ~ , , TRACT A SEE SHEET 4 CONSTRUCTION NOTES "rAZ 1 ~1 INSTALL SPOKANE C0. S' p 2 INSTALL SPOKANE C0. S1 . ~ d A k ~ INSTALL SPOKANE C0. S1 ~ ~ r n iNCTei ~ cp~ve~ir nn e-+ • _ ` ' n' . ,2 . . ~ lj2n . ~ 1000 %~iyd~s'~ , 80" „7 4- , _ . _ . - - ~n4c4C s / - 1 ~ S / T~~ ~ . _ . _ _ . . . ~ ~ ~ L/S~_~~ . _ ' . ~ y74a Q .7 . Ito ~ O INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: October 25, 1996 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070,-1 . ) ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th Description M ~ Xerox Prints Lxj Copy of Letter N~ Original Drawing MI Contract Documents M~ M ~ Work Authorization LxJ Report No. Copies Description 1 Daily Inspection Reports #43 throuQh '1153 covering the period 10-3-96 throueh 10-22-96. - Letter dated 10-24-96 to Doue Birch. ' - - PLIIpOSe M x I Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks Signed: ~ cc: (Doug irch, racific rroperties D:%TRNSMT.PMS , ~ , • ' ~ ~ ~ . . , • , . - ' ~ , "WM tNLAND ~ ~ ~ PACiFtC ~ . ~ ~ . DAILY FtELO RE~'( . . . - ~ , ' EN.Cl~VEER~NG : . . _ ; • ~ ~ . ~ . , , , . : . . ~ . . tns ector''s Datty Report No.: Oate • p . . ~ . IPE PrOJect No.: / . Arcival Time _ _ . _ _ • - _ ~ _ . ' 0,!T. . , - . l " paQs NC._ ~ • "o _ • - V~T~er - F . . . ~ . . Z `S i Rept~esentaUvet pho e nu Cltent mber • ~ ~ - ~ ~ • • • - • bu ` ~ , Gener~al Eon c r• en_ v p~ one num~er dz,g,av IPE ProJect Manager phone numbe Subaontractor yPi/~ 1PE F1eld Representattve Man ower & Equi ment'Used ► , : a~ . . . . x - . ► y • . Comments: • ~ _ ~ P~ ~ (WoricComptetedAppamntty .r•~ ~ perSpectfcatJons Problems and thelr Sotutlons) ,g6Q .N=P dantep/rap 4eL~:~ aj~ C~.~~..C . • ~ . ~ . . . - - . ~ ~ . 4A.~ . . . _ ~ P ~ . . / ~ ~ ~ . ".00 . ~ ~ ~ . IPE FIELO REPRESENTATIVE • COi~1TRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . . ' . Thls document and referenced addenda are to be constdered pretlminary untll reveiwed and stgned by the IPE constructlon sn-gtneer andlor,{PE proJect manager. ' ~ . . Oate 1 r _ ~ Date ~ IR`~~C(JNSfRUCT10N ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER Corresponding Oefictency Report No: ~ ~ . INLAND ~ PACIFlC DAILY FIELD REP - rM:ENGINEERIN.G-- . ~E itri A IAO Oats . ~ • ' ' tnspectot's Oaily Report No.: ~ ' - - ~ f-4 ; . ~ . . ~ y _ IPE Pc~oJeot No. '~age ~'o. • o~.-- . • -y Comments: (Wo*CompletsdApparently perSpecfftaatlons,Problems andthelrsotuttons) . ~ ~ • - i'` Ll 4-,.S .02 .~1 • ~ ~..~t~..~ . . - Ato . ~tA G ~ » a~, - YLT = ~ 0 C ' , r~- r ~ I~• f ' - ~ G/ "1 ~ . ~ 'Oe sg _ ~c~" . ~ / /'cc a~`~,,,.~ (t,•^ ~ . r . lo, ~ A~- . ~ . loe-11-- ,,0~ . . ~ . ~ on ; ; - ~ . / ~ ~ d~p LZ• ~ ~t~ " R 14-- ~ 000 ~ ~ ~ u~ . . . . ~ . . , . ~ ~ • 'P y~! {j`~. i~f"/ ~s s ~'a- d. i'7"~~°„~~.~r A -~~~~T ~ .~t.C~.,, l:G i~~~~~ ~Q~ ~r w~• r . ~ . S /~i~.'L~42~N ~ - ~ 40,1 e : r,. . . . . ~ ~ • • ~ . 1PE Fr.eid Rep {PE CE IpE PM Contractor's Rep ~ r1c.-ENGINEERIN.G, INLAND PACIFtC DAILY FIELD REP.:- . f i _1•. • ` . Oate . ~ • ' ~ ~ tnspeat~or's Oalty Report No.: . ~ me0 • ~ . ~ _ . ~ ~ IPE ProJect No. - . . - . i'age o. ~ • , o - • . comcnents: (WorkCompletad ApparenUy are pacSpecfflcatlons)Problems ,00;1 ~ ,~.p ~ ~ and thelrSotuttons). • r . ~ , 2z~ - a . SPr.r -o eq~ . . e ~ - - . .y ; . . 4 Non-Conforming Items: ' - ~ (ProJectorStandani Speeff(catton ~ ~ . , ' • ' Obsarved Constructlon ts ln Ncrt-Comptlancewlth) ~ - • • . , ~ . . . . , ~ . ~1 • ~ . . t 1PE Fieid Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep . ~ . • i ~ ; ~~/~/laffuw~ ~ ij~ • - _ . . ~ . - . 7L . : 142aZ;; 6 t*T _/D~.7.5 /ZT - ~.f. ~ f 7,~ ~ > 4- ~ J _ ~ ~ l-c~' 2 J_~-_► _ ~ - ~ . . ~ - ✓l S u , ! ' _ ..r.. , .c . ~ - _ - - ~ t L . • i'~ , ' . _ ~ - • . - r_ _ . - L • - • - . ~F uir~ ~ _ _ . - ~ - ~ - - - - - ~ ~ ~ . • 1..~'ite. _ E _ • 1 T''` ~~~7p- _ I ; Aj E~ • ~ ~ . _..m. _ _ . _ ; _ . . . . e: - . . ; . _ _ . ; : , ~ , . ' S ~ tA F~ P ~ ' ~ "D c ~ ct ~ry%~ rca.l, ~ Irovr - A ~ . . . . , ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ • S ,J . . ~ . . . ~ J i 7 INLAND ~ b C PACIFIC .T~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING, - . ` . . . . ~ Oate AP' Inspector's Daily Report No.: . c~~ SO" . . . ~ . IPE Project No.• Arrivai Time . . - _ . ~ . Weatner , . _ page No. ofzv Ctient . Loc Repres n tive! phon number ~ - ~ ~ l Contractor i e ep en tivel phone number Genera Subcontractor IPE P'ect Manager/ phone ~umbe 4 . IPE Field Representat~ve Ma er & Equipment Used i ~ - - ~~~,~cv~ Comments: - ~ l _ ~ (Woric Completed Apparently y G ~ ~ r~■' . per Specffications Probtpms ---''~eir Solutioes) g::?e-v0z1& ~ . Z4 ~.V.~ ~ A.~,~~.~'~ - ¢AIM v00/- - ll, .S .~.~„j er~i~'`~~~~z e ~ ~ . ~?r` ~ . . . ~ , ..•~•G . IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIV~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preiiminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andior IPE project manager. Date Date . I~PE CO~`1STf~UCTlON ENG{NEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER ~ ~ corresponding Deficiency Report No: 7 INLAND -PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT = ENGINEERING~~ ~ Oate Inspector's Daily Report No.: On- PE Project No. Page No. ot ~ I -00'0 , Comments: (Work Completed Apparently per Spectflcatlons,Problems WOX and their Solutions) 4 . ~ , ~ ~ ~ e lp S ` ~ ~ S.~L~ S O&Z I z I & , i ''OVI- ~ ~ ~ ~,o,R Q'I~U , . - ~ . . • Non-Conforming items: , (ProJector Standarcl Specification . Observed Constn,ction is in ' Non-Compltance with) IPE FiQId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ I ~P c- j6Q * ~070- ( . . ~1 o g~ A~ryrE I~ ~~1 e r c~v ~,Ik 7~ . ~ . ~ ~TG~ST ~ o C~t ~N N 8~~ t~v~-r O~rsr~v ~to~s~N~ pR~ ~rslry M~x. ~,r~~ Pur.c~vr 1~s a,, ~t a.. . _ sU, C PC~ C ~►~c cc~ ~ C. C t~~~) - c~~~- ~ ~A-~ ~ M;ssror 16 }4o Lr 9,7 13 8. 0 9y ~ r~~~ss~~ah ► ~,C, - 13Y,a q7~ ~ ~ ~ f~ocr18' l3y.o / 13 S,o y E P 3 ~~'-~9ocr is - 136.0 ~ S ~ . . y3tlor. ti3+-~o 5 - ~ 3,0' 47, 1 ~ ~ . y,o . - .134,o 7 2 r - ~ 130,6 d @ ~SG, ~ , ~ . ~9.5 m-o . ~ j . ~f INLAND ~ • • " - , . PACtFlC ' . . , . E . . DAtLY FtELO RW k ~ . . . hs s O.ate fnspectot~s Oatty Report No.: • ~ - . ~ ~ Arrivat Time : , . • . 1PE ProJect 140. QPe~fher- ~ . Page Rot • ~ , oY. . . . C • . l _ ' . Cltent , . . T , • Looa1 RepresentaUver phone number - Generai Con a r epre v phone number Subcontractor • . IPE P ect ManageN one number ~ y -0 - lPE Fleld Representative ~ m ~ , Manpower & Equipment'Used -20`a " ' 4t _ ~ - ~ - • ' . * ~ l~c~-y 2 /L4~~ ;/fiCeC -/Z-ks&AS'/L .'W it7 e P Ietsd ~ APParenUY...~~ '!`C" ~C!' 4 d~~~~ or fc Com ~ l 0~ si ~ Iw perSpecifcatlons Problems . ' . and theTr Solutlonsj e0loo' ~ -7~ - , r.. . ~ hqd ,evr .7~ ,~ir=7 e4to ItfdZI A /'r' . . - ~ v4 . . ~of.r s~-/~~~.~ T~~/~~ "O'ss exe e Kj'eel • ~V~~• ,Oope f: ' r . ~ ` • ~ • ~ ~ • . ~ • ~ f . . . ~ IPE FiEI.D REPRESENTATIVE ~ • CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATfVE . . . . This document and referenced addenda are to be constdered prelimfnary unUt revetwed and signed by the IPE constructton engineer, dlorJPE proJect manager. • r . _ Date Date • . ~C ~ ' . ~E C'NS RUCTION ENGINEER 1PE PROJECT MANAGER ~ ~ . Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: - tNLAND i ~ . . DAILY FIELD REF PACiFIc ~ 1rCw:ENGINEERIRG-- Date . • - . . ' ' ' inspectot's Oatly Re ort No.: . . ~o.~~,~-~~ . . , ~ . . . _ . . _ _ ~ f PE Projeot No . ~ . _Q~ ' • . ~ . . a2 . ~ ~ - Comments. . . . . (WotkCotnpletedAppamt(y ' ~ ~ . perSpecHicatlons)Probtems 'elCl-w.0 e-o . andtheTrSoiuttonsj 0`14P.1 00 -e ~ . ~ ei P"O • ~ ~ r' ~ ~ ~-,t~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ' ~ . . ~ . ~ L!6-,oe ep Al . ' /41.4101.0 t¢' ~ vl,~' L-7`tJ c O~r ed- . . . ori:dr~ O . e /G Z2 o A,00~4 '00If /YJ u - . ~ ~°c~ ~ ~t:~~~~ • - ~ - ~~Cr ~ ~ . . . , ~ IPE F,eId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 'M INLAND = ~ PACIFIC ~ DAtLY FIELD REM - i ~ ENGINEEftIN.Gs • ~ ~ey' Gc1~ ~ ~ - . . . Date . . • ' ~ Inspector~s Oaily Report No.: . ~ - - - tPE PtoJeot No. Page No. ~ - - oi~- . . _ . ~ . • ' Comments: • ~ . C~ ~e . ' 4 . : ~ . . (YYorkCompletedApparentl ~ ~ • pecSpecJftcattons,Problems _1s01, e and thelrSolutions) • ~ 5,~41 4wra . . 0001av/~ 1,00 ~e, % . ~ ~ 740 lz2 d. t s. ~ ~ ~ • Non-Conforming Items: ~ . ~ ~ • ~ ' . (ProjectorStandaM Spectficatlon ~ . • ~ Observed Constructlon is in Non-Compliance with) • - • . . . ~ ~ , ~ ~ , . . ~ . l.~ • . . IPE Field Rep !PE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ ~!f P1^ ~C '/~2 ~ . . . r c~ . . . . ~ 17 . 7~ . ~ ~ ~_i ? • , ; ,i.•t.~~.• • ~ ~ v . ~ ' ! C~,~ " ~ 4-~ ~ 1. . ~ : %03 ' , % 7 ,!t • , . ~C,,,. ~ ~ . . . . ~'r.~~✓ ` ~ ? ' . . t 7 ~ ~ r ~ • . ~ ) ~ U' ` ' . • f ~ ~ ' tJ . 4• - ' ' a l r ' ' • ~ • ~ ' • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.J; ! : ~ . . • • • ~ ~ LJ ".J•; ~Y ~ : 5 14 1 m h ~ R e ~ +yv,t ~ : . v? ~63. , - ~ ~ ✓~.~~:.'1 ; . _ . I~ ~ . ~ ~ ~j1I . , Z . . ~ 54, T - . . . . a . _ , . . ~ d~~ 97~~ ~ i ~ ~o . . ~ . . . . . ~ - ~ . ~ _ . ~ ~'~j! ~ . . _ . . s a ~ . . . . , oc~ . . . 7 . . . . . . . . . . _ . ; . . . . . . . . . . _ . .1 ~I'►~1 ~ - ~ . P . . . r ~ ' R t `g ~ ` -yi ! , 1 if.iaF~+ • ~ • ~ ' c_.. . . . ~ S . ~ ~ . . . ,~.✓~~~oti /~%~.~1 r' ; ol , - - - ~G ~ ~ . ~ ' . . . . . ~ ~y LT- / r- ~ • ~6 io 1 7- . . . . . . . r,; ~ ~ • . f - - . . ~ - . yb . . ~ ~ /S~;2S . ~ ~ 7 uJ ~ . . . ~~;7 -7oc,~ . , l \ t ~ ~ I ~ ~ _ ~ lo'~ ~ 1„ . .w.... ~ ~ f~ ~1~ . . ~ , 5'.j~ 10 ~i~/ ~ ~ ~ / ~ • . , t V / ~ w~ • • 1• ~ / • ~ `,^y 'i • ~ 13 c e!ti ~ 1 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ce) 14 / • ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 .01 3 iVV / • ` ` --•-.ti_-~`,, ii .00 5 ooo'~ ~ .,a ~ .8_ • - 7 .0o, • ~ ~ lool le , . ~//~1 ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .+'r9 / ~ )A4 ~ \ ~ V J► \ ~ ~ ~ 1` ~ ! "ol . , io 9 . ; ~ " 12 , r h ~~ti ~ ~ ~ ~ • 1 , ! • ~ 1 ~ ~ ` ~ ~ . r ; 1 14 13 . ~ ; 15 i ~ 2 12 ~ r, ~-••'~""L~ ~ 5~~ 20 • ~ , ~ ~ , i I ' 17 4 10 16 3 20, C41, ~ . ~ J~_r~+ ' ~ ~'y`~'~ ~d I' • 3 ~ ~r J 12 ~ ~ 17 i,~' 2 1~4~ - _ ~ _ J ~ <A6 13 S ► ~ ~ ~ r7) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PETOLEUM SGIENCES 4892401 ' P.02 : . . . , 4,rL) e r~ ar l~ 9~~-i 704 7 7 d CrTe ~ Poa- 5tatallltie , Beck Rd. Pit 3/4"~4 Bese/Mi ll h1 .potroloum Sci.ences #3079 Sample 02 May 299 1 ~ . ;x. . Siovoo x Passing Spac ' . 3/4" 100.0 100 5/8 ~ . 100.0 100 ~ 1/2 92.7 90-104 ' 3/8 72.3 . - 1/4 ~ 55.8 55-'76 }#4 49.8 40-65 ~ 8 ~ 32.0 ~ 35w55 ~ . 10 28.9 - . ~ . 16 • 2 E3 . 9 - 30 15 :0 - 40 12.7 8-24 . , 50 ~ 11 200 - ~ 7.0 3-9 An ast,or isk l.dentifies out o~-apmc data. ~ ~ : ~ , , • • . . . ~ , • . . • _ . • , . . . ~ lNUAND ~ . . i«. - : ~ . PAOlFtC ~ - . . ~ OAtLY FtELD RE~' - . ~ • K Oate ~ ' ' ~ • ° InspeatoYs Da1Iy Repart No Projea ~ Arcival Time - . - _ . . . , IPE t No.: . . • - • . ; . . 7.r`1'ZJ5 Wealhec ~ ~ • page Ro.. ztauvei Client l.+ooal Re res phone mber_ ~ General Con t c r ~ lgitti epnesen v phone num er . Subcontractor ;h-AlL.JJ ~ iPE Pro ct Manager/ phone nu be ~ IPE Fle1d Reprdsentatlve JIP4 Man ower & Equipment*Used - ~ A.~ CommenEs: ~ • 1~ (WorkCompietedAppanentiy _Azo - j perSpectficatJons Problems and thelr Solutions) e,&,v4 . . , _77,o eo-r' ,r,~ " t-9 a " rz. 14-- toL. . ~ . ~ 7741'.5 - • . . .~5.~'::.3 ~ ~ ~ ~ G~ r/ ~ ~z ~ ~ - . . . ~ . 46000, /ctey`- - !PE FIELO REPRESENTAT{VE • ~ ~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . , . This document and referenced addenda are to be-constdered preliminary untif reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructfott engineer ndlor*IPE proJect manager. . Date • Oate ~ C', ~ ~ E CVNSTRUCTION ENGlNEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER ~ ~ - . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: . ~ ~ "9 tNLAND DAI LY FI ELO REPOAV , PACtFIC - torn: ENGINEEf2tN.Gt ~r • ' ~ ~ ~ , . _ ~ Oats . ~ ~ . • ' ~ ~ inspeotor's Oatty Report No.: tPE Project No. Oage rio. ~ . o~-- : . . . . . . . . . . , Comments.. (VtifotkCompletsdAppamntly perSpeciflcations)Problems / zee'/_'~7l . . o Gx~ ~ ~►ndtholrSoiutlons) • ~ 000 A-1 ~~..e.. 4 ,m , . 04~~~~~ . . e-;. t, . ooo -4 OP- . a 00~~' ' ~ . ~~1~~~- s u~ ~ - ~ O Os ~7>~ ~ , r ' _ ~ ~r „ c~, i~ ~ 014 ! . C• S ~_/o ~FJ ~ ~ ' . ~ iOO. :5 vei,'P ~ r - . ~ • . / • : ~~~_P . r'.Gc,.~ l~1. Gt1P~' ~ ~ SCC~ yaoe~~O /,.-f ~ ~ ~ " w ~ a-~. ~ . - J254 lPE Fieid Rep IPE CE ~ lPE PM Contractor's Rep r 1 NLAN D PACtFtC - DAtLY FIELD REP~~V . 1C:ENGINEERIN.G- lnspeotoes Oate Oaily Report No.: ~ ,Cp • • , - - - . - ~ ~ - ~~5~ . ~ . . ~ O ~ ~ ' 0~-- • - !PE Project No. . :6~d` ~ • . , ~ Comments. ~ . (Ylfotk Compteted ApparentJy . a.LP ,at Le petSpectftaat]ons)Probtems ~'yf ♦ # Q -S snd thelrSo1utJons) ~Ga o ~ /U ~ ~o i ~ s ~r/, r ; m 0 oa P f A? 19 CAW ~ A! &.&ft 4 e ee-&Ae` . ~ ~ . • i ` Non-Conforming Items: (ProJectorStandan3SpecfitaatJon • • . ~ , Observed Constructlon is In ~ . Non-Compltancewtth) . - . ~ . ~ - y . ' . . ' . ~ ~ . . . IPE Fiald Rep " IPE CE lPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ I ~ . . . , . . . ~ ~ . .10 - ~f ~ ` ~ t ~ • OO ; . . . ' . ° . . . • . . . . . . . { ~ . . " - . . ' ' ' . , M_ . , . . . . . . . ' ~ • . ' ' ' - . . ' . . . _ . _ . . . J - ~j 6 . . loO T O Il/[ G ~ - / ` o~ . . ` ad _ . . . T _ . ,n -lood . . ~ . _ ~ ~~/r~ •".~,':°~l , t~ ~l ~ ~A c . . ~ . ~ . / . . . , _ , . . ~ ,3a6° ~ s. . . . . ^ ~ d-7 Ve.. • . . a/7 ?006 . . ~ ~ ~0 Z--~ ~ •r. , ~ ~ 4-~{~ / f ;?75 ~o ~ . . . s . . . _ ~ . . e241 . . _ ' . . . 62?7.0 ~ . . . L,- p~~. . . . y . . . . , ~J i ~`~~_v ~ . . . ~ . . . . _ . - f . _ . . - . , ~ l~ ~ ~ . . . . . . . - . - -~~1~~~-..~.~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ a~"~°. . _ n..~ ~ 8` a . Z:,7--' o~ . . . . . _ . . . ~ ~ ~ . - . ~ ~ G ~dc 5~~~ . . . ~ ~7a . . . . . _ _~:__o~_. W_ . . . . . . . . _ . . ~ . - - - . . : . . ~ . ~ 'r.."' , . • Y c 1FL "I• INLAND . PACIFIC ~ DA,ILY FIELD REPORT s - , ENGINEERING 7Oate Inspector's Oaily Report No.: Arriva! Time I P E Proje c t N o.: - - ~~~ZO - . . ~ age of c/ - ea er . (07 Cllent - Loc t Representatlve/ phone number /Floiz/11 4ee~'~'~'-S Genera~ontractor Site RLspresentat v p one ~um~er ~Aw,gy 4",.O-S Subcontractor ' IPE Project Man ger/ pho e nu ber Z~? 4=441~~4A/l ~~1 IPE Field Representative ~ Z);4it Manpower & Equipment Used ~ _1~'2,~ - ~D ~t~~r~Lr • C~^~.I t~s~.t~.a ' /C'~~ 1r~'~ 4J~~:e~~ ~r-Q~~►~C~ia-~ ~t~. , ~ TA'~~r ~ - ~ ~ ~/~S'~ ~ t~.•-~~ ~G ~'~6~~~,~~ n.~~ . Comments: (Worfc Gampleted Apparently ar- ecifications Problems u elr Solutions) p~ .1 ~ 9,,~,-- . ~ . Lxti~ O~i~1(/U9~t~f dlJ1Glµ~ ~~/vl , c~~ ~ . a r~, ~ T~ " a.- ~ . _L~ ir s C~~ .l~i~ 42~~ ~ ~ Q .if~ t~ ,oe,,C'.~ /.~n ~ ~ .~o ~~,.t ..Sr.•~ cC~~,,l.~ct ~ rr=~p 7e C0( IPE FIELD REPRESENTAT E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the tPE construction engineelrdlor IPE project manager. Date Date ~ •/jf',~ 7i. IPt COIiSTRUCTION ENGINEER tPE PROJECT !V{ANAGER t,004 . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: \ O REPpRT . ~Dp►~~-Y F~EL ~ - . . Da~~y epQirt No: N~ . . R tnspectoes ~ . ~ p►C~F~C Q~ r . P Ft14G , o. NGtN~E : a9a ~ , . E Lg ' te . prolecti r1o• Q G~ ~omrr,ent~~ d APP~'~n~y , f ~rr►p~g~ aterts ~Ncrk ' lonsprO ~;Q~,t Ps~ Solutiohg1 snd . ~ / . - ~ ~ ~ , 14 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r+' ~ ~ f{ - _ / r ")/~•//J~(~~• ~ ~ . ~ .5 ~ • ~ ~ . ~ ~ 40 y j ~ • I ~ . r ~ k~ ~ . ~ - - ~ - e e Gt- .42 1--~ U • ~ ~ ~o a f 1~ ~ c ~ ► . O L ,✓J~~-'C- ~ - , S Rep ~t• Con~,~ctor ,■i . IPE Feild ReP r.."~ D REP~~T . . Dp►~~.-Y F~E'L . / ND ~ InsPe'~~ °eS paiiy Rep°rt ( ppCIF#C EERING ENG~N ~age0• - to 6100 ►O tAo. : - _ ~ vOt~1h'►Bn~ ~d APPa~nt1y orkC°n'p probtems 6 ~s~ ~;l~ ~ ~G~ ' lw &PQ~tflcawn$ p►nd ~ ~ - _ f_ ~ . . . . . 500~trC- .a-• , _ . . ~ , ~ ~ ► ~ ~ - ' . - . ► ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ . . . . _ ' ,r,. . . lternS* . - ccnf~ryrin9 speayfjcauo~" Prolgdtorflistructlcn ig obsOM'd wtthl ' . . i ~ , ~ . . _ ' • . . ConCtor'S ReP . ` p•~ . , d~ ,PE p~ J p~ CE iPE Feild Rep . ~ • - • . ~ . y7 : . . . . . . _ _......._.._._.__..r_ . . ---i6 -r-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , g .:~~L.T' S a~ ~ ~ - , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . _ . . . . _ . ~9._.__._._ . . . . . . 0 o~-~ . . . . . . . . S L~_/_ ~ ~ . . . . . _ _ . . ~ . ~?S_~ ~.T__.~~~ ~ . _ $ - . . o ~.T . ~ _ . . . . - . y"_.--•-----~ ~a~~~' / , ~ . o _ , . _ . . ~ . . . . . . "ol~..., ~ ~ - _ . . . . _ . _ . . . .a-. ~ i. . . ~ . . 71g _ ~ _ . . . . . . . _ . . _ - . . o~ ~I~ _ g_~`_..._.. . . . . . - ~ 7S . . .o~._ . ~ . , . . . _ _ ~ . ~ ~ - - . . ~-I~ 7S ~ t LJ ~ . . a 1NLAND PACIFIC DA1LY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING - • w`'`-K'~~ . Oate Inspector's Daily Report.No.: Arrival Time ~ IPE Project No.: a9e tvo. of: , ~ . . . ir ~►eatner ~ so~ C Client. -Loc Representative/ phone number ~ . G General Contract~or . Site prese~ ve phone number Subcontractor . ~ IPE ProJect Manag r/ phone nu ber u ~ a-~Y , ~ IPE Field Representative . r:~ Man ower & Equipment Used ecJ e cleeZ4e- Comments: (Worfc Completed Apparently ~ per Specifications Problems a- °'hetr Solutions) b"!" '~'t. (~c.. • . * r,~/ l~~S* l~tJ~ ~ t- rA,. /tr 1 T tJ C ~ r ~ ~ x 1<pe- We ~ ~SS,~ ~ - A";; i e L~afl d ~ _ C c JZ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIV CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered prellminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. Date Date 1 ✓ ~G~ ~ . IPeCOtf,TRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER ~ - - Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ ~ 1, Li 71NLAND ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT . ENGINEERING ~ Date ~ Inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No. . i'age iqo. ot . W-0--7 , /o oo4eel Comments. (Woric Completed ApparenUy- perSpecifiaavons Problems ei e-we- and their Soluttons) ~ IJ~G / Ce lit. oC r i ~ AwZF~► Ci 4./_ O /4L-N IZ-1'~o s2 a m . .a .s~ s/]-e,aYr_-41 6t~~/A ~ . ~ T l~ G . ,CL,~~'~► ,~y~C~ % ~t~ ~ -C GcJ d GI_ ~ L°.~C ~ • ~ . ~ ~ ro ss': la_,~e ~ ~-Cl~ ' , . Zo ~ q .00, Non-Conforming Items: (Project or Standard Speciflcatton Observed Construction is in . Non-Compllance wlth) • IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep . • ~.J ' J: < \ a... . . . ♦ . . N. . • - . ' . . • - • . ' • 7 INLAND PACIFIC ~ DAILYFIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date . 1"7600 inspector's Oaily Report No.: - ~ Arrival ime IPE Project No.: S~'v0 . . &vi-e7d . WeaUher page No. ot - ~ C;~ Client - Local Represen tive/ phone number ~ G~L4 ~ General Contractor ~ e eprtesen ve phone number Subcontractor IPE P ct Manager/ hone nu er ~ IPE Fieid Repre entative S 1- Manpower & Equipment Used - ,Comments: ~ M►orlc Completed Apparently -14,' r a pelol 4a Qj'el xa/~ . )pecffications Problems . . . thetr Solutfons) a 4,7 L1~G~~ a-j~ eA- ~ .99u 174 f,^/. /r ~ur~~ ~r~ /~.e. %~c ~ i,s ~ a~e~ a.~` a- d~ ~ ~ f•~x:,~. /J~- ~ r. CA/ IA-J Lh^ 000, IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVc E:~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and -signed by the IPE construc 'on engineeyr /or IPE project manager. ! - Date Date 7~r E C RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT f1AANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELO REPORT .-.z ENGINEERING , Date ~ Inspector's Daily Report No.: Der& i IPE Project No. iiage No. o1r Comments: 1,7,0 4 ' (Woric Completed ApparenUy per Specffications Problems ~ ,7~T~-~ Q ~ and thelr Solutions) _ 46 a C_ . - . ~ Non-Conforming Items: ' (Project or Standarc! SpecificaUon Observed ConstrucUon Is (n Non-Compllance with) • IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep I N LAN D . ~ PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Oate / Inspectoc's Oaily Report No.: Arrival Time IPE Project No.: _ . - - - ~ ' 'w'eather page ~o. / o ~ - - ~jL~cX~ ~~OS / . Client J Local R presentativel pho e number . General Contractor ~ e epres v p one numper 6A9 -91- . Subcontractor - IPE P ject Manag r/ phone nu er 4°~'c~,~e IPE Fietd Representative ~ c. . . Manp er & Equipment Used Comments: . (Wortc Completed Apparently mar-qnecfficaUons Problems ~ - etr Solutlons) zwa se'?tlA ~ - le ~ kfzl ~ &7 . ~ ~ZA001P-CL.-S a46ej A6- 4o-lcl gi,.md 17L4.,I- 7-L IPE FtELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the fPE construction enginee"nd/or {PE project manager. . t-.,Jk Da te Date IP COdkTaUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER u ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ` ' ~ INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT _V~z ENGINEERING 7r Date inspector~s Daily Report No.: S IPE Project No. -l'age No. ot Comments: xg (Woric Compieted Apparently ~ perSpecifications Problems ' and their Solutlons) ,r . • ~ Non-Conforming Items: (Project or Standarc! SpecificaUon - Observed Constructlon Is in Non-Compllance with) . IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~7 wm-- 1NLAND - PACIFIC . DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date q Inspector's Daily Report No.: _ ~ L~/ /~✓`~~al.~ % ~ Arrival Time IPE Project No.: w"eather , page Ro. -'O of Client ~ Loca Representative/ phone number er GeneraiCon c o~ e resen vel phone number Subcontractor . IPE ProJect Manager/ phone number /0, IPE Field Representative Man ower & Equipment Used -looo~7 ,f Comments: , (Woric Camplete-d Apparently _ZZ,2P • ~ ~ -J~j Q ',~jr~ P ,►,,P , per Specifications Problems a ''etr Solutions) C ~'/'P.G►_ ~ G ~O ~ z f ► A y /toD c2.a /XL0 e .3 le Ser tJ`i e- P 7/4-o- 14- /,J e e- ~ ~ e ~o ~ c~ s ~ •v ~ G S~o ~ a / IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE ~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. - ! Date Date IPE G TF~ CTION ENGINEER _ IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ S 71NLAND ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Oete Inspector's Oaily Report No.: IPE Project No. - ~'age No. o~ ~ Comments: ~ r 1'~i ~'l~ C~ 1~~~► ~ ,~,~'`"r .,~r . . • _ ~ (Wor{c Completed ApparenUy perSpeciflcationsProblems ~ ~ GC.I~~d•~ ez,~ ~~SP..~~~~.!,✓' and their Solutions) / • ,,,~-P f' c /r~~ a~ ~ ~i~P ~ 0 !tt T > , . - - ~ . ~ Non-Conforming Items: ' (Project or Standard Specification Observed Construction is tn Non-Compliance with) • 0 IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 4100olP td a //---o 71 ~e al / (e ~ ~ 6 (C~ - . ~ . ~ ~ . . . . _ . , J . r__.~..._~..._. . ........_......~'-1.~ . . ,~-:.(,.~.~~6. ~ t~► --1~.~'` - - _ ~ .00, . -i -.W . ~ ~ - - - _ . _ . _ ~ /Yklo~~ • +Yf-~ 5 ~ . , . , . . , . i t _ . .--;-t---- _ . _ . . _ ^ _ . _ . _ . . . . . . . _ 'i - - i - ~ _ . - • - - - - • . _ _ . ; - - . . _ . . - ~ ~ ~ - - - . - - - - - . . , r~-- ~ Fi'tGr -tlkb/'jG ' ' •---~r~~.{.~F.~,~?'-' - ~ , . _ . . . . . " . . . ~ . ~ " " ' ' ' ' . . . _ _ . . . _ . S' . . ' ' . ~ . . . _ . . ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT L ~ Date -Inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Tlme IPE Project No.: Weather ~ - - - . . . , ~ : . iiage No. oi.. . . . Cllent . ° Loca Representative! hone number ' beneral Contractor MWRep en v p one number Subcontractor ' IPE P ect Manager phone n ber L%~ IPE Field RepresentaUve e, j;941;:2 , . Man wer & Equipment Used "O~ 7''r44. C'l . - - - ° Comments: (Worfc Completed Apparently ~'4i ,d SP n~ perSpecffications Problems eirSolutlons) 44G Siesy't,C. f~a~i~~t9A..~/l3-►- 9 G? t.,~~ T?7 ~ j ~ - w c r se Yu /c.c r 744-14-s Z;4 .Yf ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ 6-axi Ate,, u" ~0 io too Q e.qQs ~ OOF . . _ ~ . ' i~~• ^:s' ~lJ~ . . . • 'OL ~ ~ 1PE FIELD REPRESENTATIV CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This do~urrrent and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed -by the IPE cons tion engine "r and/or IPE project manager. ~ Oate Da'te IPE NSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: " ~ 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT oi: ENGINEERING ~ Oate / Inspectoes Oaily Report No.: IPE Project No. Page No. ~ ot/' _ . . V . . _r Comments: ell X (Worlt Completed ApparenUy i ' " • 1 per SpeciflaaUons Problems and their Solutions) . J /2YI .~;P~ .~C. L~l.t, Y'5~.. ~ ~.'O ~'r'G~ ~lb ..a/tJ s ec0~9 2-.6 ~La A-e... davtk~ P4'4td ~d ti L -7z- ~ ~ /6 ~ e t s o 9 t ~.1e . L ~-T 9' ~ L i Non-Conforming Items: (ProJect or Standard Specification Observed Constructlon is in Non-Compl[ance with) • , VC IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep DEVELOPER'S APPROVAL THE UNDERSIGNED DEVELOPER OR HIS ASSIGNS AGREES TO CONSTRUCT IMPROVEhfENTS IN /VCCORDANCE WITH THIS PWd, MID UPON COMPLET'ION. THE OEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE ' FOR SUBMITTING REPRODUCIBLE RECORO DRAWINGS TO 8E COMPLETED 8Y A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AND/OR PROFESSIONAI. WVD SURVEYOR FOR REIAEW M1D APf'ROVAl. 8'Y SPOKANE GOUNTY IIfIUTIES DEPARTMENT AT THE COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTiON. 0 ~ eo!o 7 DEVELOPER'S APPRO+VAL DATE . THIS CONSRUCTION PLAN. EXPIRES . ONE.. (1) YEAR FROM DATE OF APPROVAL. . AS-BUILT APPROVAL(ENGINEER/SUR'VEYOR) DATE COUNTY ROAD RIGHT OF WAY OR PRNATE ROAD EASEMENT PRIVATE PROPERTY .x4„ 4 W00D MARKER POST INSTALLED PROPER?Y LINE INSTALL SEWER SERVICE T4 A MINIMUM PLUMB, LENGTH AS REQUIRED. MARK aF 10' BEHIND THE PROPERTY UNE 0 LENGTH WITH BIACK CRAYON AT ONE . THE EDGE OF SIOEWALK, WHICHEVER FOOT INTERVALS MEASURED FROM . EXTENDS FARTHEST INTO THE LOT. BOTTOM. (PAINT EXPOSED PORTION r . . OF OPPOSITE SIDE WITH FLUORESCENT ~ GREEN PAINT.) ATTACH 6 GAUGE, WIRE , 2' MIN. , -~1TH No. 16 COMMON NAILS. , 7 ' PROPOSED STREET SIDEWALK WHERE AND CURB APPUCABLE . 9' DESIRED MIN. DEPTH. DEPT MAY BE ADJUSTED UP OR DOw 22 1/7 BENOS BY ENGINEER TO ALLOW FOR \AS REQUIRED 70POGRAPHIC CONDtT10NS OF PRNATE PROPERIY, TYPE OF STRUCTURE To 8E SERVICED A ~ - CAP ~ THE SET-BACK OF *THE STRUC' ~ g" x4" TEE TO BE SERVICED. . ~ "~1►-~ ~ ~ 3 4" PVC SEWER SERVICE 4"xg'xCONCRETE BRICK . PIPE MINIMUM SLOPE 0.020 Fr./Fr. 4" P'VC SEYYER SERVICE PIPE TO BE USED WHEN DESiREO M(NIMUM DEPTH OF 9' AT PROPERN UNE !S N4T AYAILAQLE OR WHERE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE DEPTH OF SERVICE IS REQUIRED. MINIMUM SLOPE OF .010 FT./FT. MUST BE . INSTALLED USING A SURVEYOR'S LEVEL FOR THIS CONNECTION. ~ TYPIQAL SEW 5ERY-CE To~ ~S . ...g . . . . ~ - - ; Bro►tch cr T'h•d ~~a1`rb/► $ / ~q ~Gv~-~i~?n ~1 e X ~ . -J . t/ . . ~ . ~ . • v /l . . . L'OOIIO' - . ~1 - - ~ . - P00001, ~ _ . 1.0ello, . tooooe , . . voo, ~ . ~ . Jr tol tIo, ~ ~ . . pooooe . . . . . . . . . ~ *,0" - ~ ~ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . ; , , . - " ' ~ . _ S~. . . _ ~ ~ ~d - s ~vtd - ~•o~ d~ s~~ ~~~3~~} 1.*4000 ~ . 400* ~ . _ . . . - ~ . ~ . - ~ ~ . ~ . . _ ~ -1--Oeooooo 9 i ~ ~ . - , ~ ' . toooooe ~ _ _ • - , --r 1*04001le - ; • ~ 1 P - • ~ . ~ ' ~ • , • ' " " ~ ' _ . . ~ - - . _ : ' ' . . - ' 1 . [ ~ ~ • i ~ ~ f ~ t ' ' -0. ~Y~ . . - . . . . . . . . I-- ' ' . . . s....~ . -~..a~~~~__'.._.. . ~j-- . - -C._..... . i - - - • - _ _ . _ - • f - . ~ ~ . " " ' . . _ . . ' ~~~~.~~1"..-~.~-.s~~~..~~.___ . . - . . ' t ~i • I . V . . . . . • ' ' . . . . _ ~ - • " • _ i~ CD . . ~ . . : : i ' . . . ~ ~ ~ . . i ~ , ~ . . . . : _ . - , , ~ , , kev I ~ ~ V , ~ ~ . . ~ ~ E . . , , ~ ~-•~,,,.,~.:r3 1 ~ ~ : ~ E• ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , , ; . i . . . ~ , ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ . x. ~ ~ i ~ : " ~ • . ~ , ~ i • , . ' ' ~ • ' , 7 f ~ - - ~ . ~ I . ~ . /0000 1/000, i • ~ N I ~ _ ___~W____~._.~___-_-•._.._.-_..----••- ...--------r . T. _ . _ _ ~ ~ • 1 ~ . ( - - -.}_~4-.--~~__ . , . . _ . . . . . - . . _ . . . . ~ • ~ ' . . . . C - - . - - • - • • • , • . _ . ~t . i • r ~ - _ . _ ' ~ , ...e. ' - - - . . . _ . . . . . _ . . . ' . . . . • i ~ ' - - - ! - ~ ~ , _ . .v._•---~---~'-----°- - . . • . _ . . _ t~ Y~ e ' - • - . i - ~ . . _ . ° - • ' - - - . . . . _ _ . . . . i~ . I' . . . . . _ 'i' ' ~ ' • '--'.V.._._... ..~..~d,-~_. _ . . . . _ . . _ . _ . . . ' - - . . . . i • i . . . . ' _ ' ' ' ' . . . . ._~r~____ . . . . ' ~ ~ ; I ' • _ ' " ' . ~ . . _ . . - . _ . _ . " •'r . . . ' . -'-'-.___~._,..r. . . . l ~ , . . . - - • - ° . . . . . . . - • ' ' INSPECTOR'S. ~ 5aA REPORT ~NSPECTOR: PROJECT NO. - - PROJ ECT : CONTRACTOR: __(<;i~,loi?1 ~ WORK PERI00: ~ A . M . 6 P . M . WEATHER A.M.: P.M.: V I S I TORS : MANPOWER AND EQUIPMENT co, 6 z. e A2, SUPERINTENDENT: FOREMAN: OPERATORS: ,3 LABORERS: -SURVEYORS: FLAGM N: OTHERS: - E Q U I PM E NT U S E D:_~',~qo/ , . . : . ACCOUNT OF 1NORK AND DtSCUSSIONS a . TRAFFIC SIGNS AND BARRICADES CHECKED: . A.M. P.M. STREETS CLOSED: T.I M E : WO RK : /o~ ~ . L aa~ ~ rcb1 P I~~.~ lae-o n lrus-eZ m e ~ria►~ ( c o n t i n u e d o n b a c k) .TESTS: - . T-. WORK DELAYS: AS BUILT NOTES: CITIZENS CONCERNS: . UTILILTY/PROPERTY DAMAGE: ~EVIEWED BY - PROJECT ENGINEER`~~.4 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER: ~ r. PAGE ~ 0 F DATE : /v /z ~ / 9~ ((;ot4T"D) ACCOVN-- 0F VypRK .r K . ~s~'2cLl~ .~Q-~1 ~ • TIME: W4R 7" ,p~ , ~ ~ • oll ~4 ~~ra~~ • ~ ~ t , eat, . . r s~'s ' e-- Gi ~ • ' ?7aGU-r L-=-D / Q ,~Pl , , ~ . f . , ~ s . . . . . ~ . 7 INLAND - PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Oate Inspector's Daily Report No.: An-ival Time ~ IPE Project No.: - . U •I ~s ~~~a'J""~ Weather - • - i-age No. . . oi _ _ . C • ~l~,~r eo ~ ~ . ~ . Clfent :Nep;4.e-nf epresentative! pliane number ~ ~t ~ beneral Contractor ZWP611 v phone number ~i4~~~/ Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number az p Aa 00~ .~4'.S8'r~~`4ol.B IPE Field Representatlve Man ower & E uipment Used 5e,~~ - _ _ ► d ru. Comments: (Work Completed Apparently ,~~4~ ~ ~f,O ~b perSpecfficatlons Problems ; . : tieirSolutions) ~ ~ • ~icJG ~~'t"~ • - /~-~~"a..~ ~LL el I%e- • ~ . / 74 t7 O TXa./ P►^cv c ~,c.S Gc~ a/ hAss (Vra . ~d A490 r~ ~ &.dlel~af 4A Se- dictLv. /'21A a ca-r Pk!~ 1~s /c s s %XP...,A 77--e- u. AC~ ~ Aft • . - IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIV CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction enginee and/or IPE project manager. ' t a Date Oate c , ~ ' I CQt~S RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER (I f Corresponding Deficiency Report No: - . D R~p~RT . ~ ~ DAii-y FIE~" Y pN0 pa~ly Rep°~' ~0.*. ~ IN1.. ~ InsPect'0~s ~ ppCiF1C 'NG - ' Qt c ENGINEER 00 ~`'age~~l°' . ' o a 'j te - ~ a....~ ~ 7tim ' . E ptojec . e G ents. ~,,rents~t ~ u O'~,n,~ et,ed APP $ i Wo* ~a►mPons P'~'°b~sm Psr Spee ~,Otu~olls) ~ l and ~►e`r ~ ~ S acj4 . ~ ~ r~~~' • i ~ • ~ .3. - ~rft _ /0yrf ~ .09?S 1s ~ ~ . cL keol-~ ~-G~~-- / X f-W ~torIs Rep ~ Cont.ra► IPE PM IPE CE 1PE Feitd Rep - jZ A ~ . . . . . . ~ . . 6.74S A2-d CT'riG LINCa~ ._r.._ . • . . - ~ p . - ~ 1Y. r~_..._ . _ . . i 4 r3/ y . ~ - ; i _ r vo J;2 'l . . . ..3 . . . ; ~ . . . L ~ j . ~ ~~-s~ ~~t . . . - . . . . ~ . . . i. ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ . ~ ~~.y , . ~ ~ ~ . . _ _ . . . . ~ 2Yfw . . . . . , . 4 i ° 3 . . . 3/ _y_.. ° . . . . . . . . . - r 05 . . . . 1- . . . . . ~ 1 7$ LT. .7, • f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - •'.f ' . . :el5tM~.r ~ ~ . . . - . .4L. . . _ 1 ~9r7 Ty' . ~~G . . . / , 2 ~ 2q6 a ~ ~ 16 t -6 d Z" 7 ~ . . ~ . (~,~e~P~-~~► - _ ~ . . ~ 7~~'~~._.Li . .a~ 8'°. . . .~..._y... . _ _ . ~ 3/- ~ ..a__~... _ a ~ ~ ~ ~ cA f` ' ~ . _ _ . . . ~ ~ : ~ ~ . , . . ~ ~ . . _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~s. . . . . . . . ..~~~?_.t~::~_.__ ~ . . ~ . , . . ► ~~f ~ - ~..._r. _ . . . , ` .i ...._.._...._l.~,..__ . . , i ' 1 lf..._...._..... _ ~ . ~1 ~ ~ . . ~~~s ~1C_-• . _ '_i.~.,_..._._. . 3~ ~ . ~t3 ~.da__-__._..~._ --..--.-~.7.~. . . . . - . . . , ~ :,r If .F~ T" ~ ~ ~ ~~Z ~ _ 1.._' . . ~ . - . . ~ ~ . _ . . ~ . . . _ . . - - ~ ' . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . . . . . ~a~!_. _ _ . . . . _ . , „ . l~t-1~~ __.7~~ . . . . . . . . . . ~ ,r ~ c~i a.~. o cl, ~ O ' • • ~r~t:_r• ~ T~ y . ~ : tj~ 1~ ~'''/~,'f_ , • ~t ~ . . . ' • ~ _ . ~ ~ , • . . ~ t ~f.~ . . . . • . • , ^ ~ 'Y~~ ! t i~~~g, • ' V • ~ • . . : ~9~.:~~,; - . . , , - . ' . : , ~ - • . , . ~ ' ' ' ' ~a a . ,S 4 . { - - _ • • . • • ` ' • . . ' . . • • • • , • . . ~ . _ . . • - • - ~ . ' ~ 1 . _ ~~y'- ~ a . : . . . • I . ~ ~fj ~r • y7,,, ~S - . ' ~ - . • L..:~+'.: ~ O ~i/~C • ~ ~ ~ . J) L ~ w• • ~ ~ ~ • • • ` • - • Zs ~ - ~ . ~ ~ ~ • • a .~l ~ . ' ' _ • ~ . Ic ` - ~ . ~ . . _ . . . . . . . , ~ , . ~ o . . ~ ~ . . ~ Inla'nd ~ . MEMO ❑ PR4JECT 7P a C I f 1 C CALC. ❑ JOB N0. ' r SHEET,-5 OF.~ ~ En ine rin ~ g e g MEETING ❑ ~BY DATE ~U~a West 707 7th, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 OTHER CHK'D BY DATE S4- 509_458-6840 Fax No. 509 458-6844 - J ~ • ~ 7 ~ . ° INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ~ October 24, 1996 Pacific Properties . 14410 Bel-Red Road - - - - Bellevue, Washington 98007 Attn: Doug Birch . Re: Riverwalk 7th Addition - IPE Job #96070-1 Inadequate Sewer Stub Location Markers Dear poug: - - We checked the locations of sewer stub location markers during.our site visit Monday morning (See Field Report No. 52, dated 10/21/96, attached), to obtain information for the required project record drawing set. Our inspector noted that none of the sewer service location markers L had been constructed in accordance with.fhe details shown in the approved project plan set (copy - attached). In addition, the marked location of some of the services does not appear to meet the minimum setback from the property line ("requires extension" column) shown on the.detail. " ~ i . . . ' It will be necessary for the deficient work to be corrected prior to acceptance of the construction by Spokane County. We are available to provide any survey or engineering services necessary to help in correcting the deficient construction as. a Special Service to our existing contract. Please feel free to call if you have any questions or comments regarding this letter or other aspects of the project. . Respectfully Submitted, ' INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING . n c~~✓~-h Bruce A. Howard Principal Enclosures: Typical Sewer Service Detail Field Report No. 52 cc: Garry & Sons Construction/ Mr. Dave Goss Spokane County Engineers/ Mr. Ed Parry jAdocum«nts\96070-iwe;nn. wpc 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Caeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 ' 7 - ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers . 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: November 27. 1996 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parrv PROJECT NAME: Ri-verwalk 7 th Description M ~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents Work Authorization M X~ Report No. Copies Desc.ription - 1 Daily Ir.svection RPports #54 throuRh #SS coverinQ the veriod 10-30-96 throueh 11-18-96. ' PUrpOSe M XI Information MI Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks - - ~ . Il Signed • ~ CC: Doug~$irch, Pacif~c Proverties ` D:\TRNSMT.PMS L~7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Rio ~ ,4 &rA- Date ~ Inspector's Oaily Report No.: l '`i' Arrival Time IPE Project Na.: ~ . . VSTeather ~ i~,age ivo. > or , Client Local epre§entaUve/pph ne number ~I~ite Rep Vsen&Tvei hone number + Genera~ Contracto/r v~- Subcontractor ' IPE Project Mana er phone umb ~ ~ U ~ IPE Field Representative Man,pf? wer & Equipment Used , ~ r^ f ~'i~ ~ /Il6 I'YI Pyt l ,r- . t V v Comments: ,z orit ComPleted ApParentl e ct D ~ (W ~ / ~ ~ ~ S ±~t-f-~- j r~ 5./G`' • ;:1 Y per Spectficatlons Pr+oblems ~r • eir Solutions) / k ' ~ % /I Q G T`O` n TC J~Y P ~r r'"' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1' ' / ) f ^ ~ ' / - ~ A ~.i l-f' i.// 0 1-7 e ~.-s/ Lt.~ e-- / A,17 G S e. 7L~ 14- - %.,,G. ~ 1-r, ~ . , VI ~ ~ e•'~,.('i~S. 12,)P A 7 , r f~`~..C~ •'idy ~ ~~C.~,:'! G~.'~ 1.J~ ~ ~ „ ' • t) i~ ~rp ~ / i ff ~f ~~e'" .d' ."'r~ ::a :~r r t . . ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. Date Date IPit CONSTRUCTION ENGiNEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: - - - - - - , ~ ~ , ~ ~ + - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ , ~ {~k . ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ` " . ~ h . ~ ' ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~'~y ~ ~ ; ~ e~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ti~? ~ • ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~f, ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ " ~ ~ 4~ , ~ ~ ~ ~au~~~~ ~ u~ ~ . ~ ~ • ~ ~~v ~ ~ ; , , ~ . s ~ ~ ~ ` , , , f ti ~ . • ' i , t . . F ,y • . P'Iy - ~ ~ ' , - . . . 'i ~r 4 ~ , ' ` .~r` A' " ' . r . . 1 ' , i ~ ' 4•J ' ,i.~, • ~ .il~' r ' i F . ' , . ~ , j r~ . ' . ' , r{'~ , ' . ~ ' r ~ ~ . • ' ' d t+ • ~ ~ ~ Fx;1 ' . , . ~ " ~i ' , ~ , - ' 3 ~ ~ ' ~ . ~~l_ i _ F . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ' n . . ~ ~ ~ f~ C ~ 1 . < ~ ~ ~r ~ x ~ s i . ~ ~ ' f r ~ 1 , „ , ~r " • w4 . . _ , _ , , , ~ . , ~ s i i ; ~ ~ r ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ L ,R „ ~ i yS ~f , ' 3 ~ . ~ ~ ;,1; , ~ 7 ~ f ~ ~ - ' s~ 4 ~ ~ ~ , ; , { 1 ~ ~1 ~ s ~ : ~ , . ~ ~ ~ 1 a ~ ~ c ~ r + ~ ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ; f ~ 2 ~ { 'i ; ~ ~ 1 l f G Vw ~-'1 " ~ ~ ~ ~ r~~l ~ 1~~ , ~k ~ ~ - f - . ~ ~ ~,ti~ r~ sk~ ~ ~ ~J ~ ^ ~4 ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ' An~ . ~ ' 1~ 1 ~ . 10 ` , - , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rp , ~~~v,~ ~ f ~ rS~ ~ 1 ,1 s ~ - ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ .'r . ' I ~ ~ f, ~/~~I ~ ~~5,~ ~rta ~ , rf' ~x~~~~~~~' ~ / ~ ~ ~~y I U 1 ~ ~ ~ l ~~X} %~t ~ ~ ■rr rf : / ~ ti r / / , w rr A ~ / , 1 ~r~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 'p ~p~S p . f TL~hI~T ~,~.r ~ ~ ~l 'I f5l5 ~ ;.n1 ~j^ . ~ k k F~l'V4.►~ y ~'1„ ~ 1nw ~ ~ . J 1 i kJL1 ~ . ~ 'r f ~ ~ _ ~ _ v • ~ 1~ ~ - 1 ~ ' - ~ ~~w~-.- ,_,~f ~~YI 1f= µL,15A~ h k~r / y ' . ~ IMIVL_I\1Yn1.S~ 4 ~ e ~ / ~ ~ . l `hw ~ 4y ~ ,'r r 4~ y f'6^Iww~ A IZrt T1/lA I ~ ~ ~ ! } ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ I~F~ I 1"1 Ll U I I ti.11 4 ~ 4 ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ r frf ' ' ~ ~ +r`p ~ ~ / y ~ ~ L+S~ J ~ ~ M1~ _ _~,r^..-~„rr~„~_,I, a ~ ~ I ~ ~ `ftir ~ ~.~~y ~ ~ ~ 'Fc.. ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ir ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~ a, 4~ ~ r~ P~~~ . ~ r ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ k ~ , ' 4 ~ / ~ ~ ry ~ 1 ~1 ~ rr~ 4~ f~ V' ~ f~ ~ '~4 ~ a ~~~~.r.`d~~f ~ ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~~r~L~fr ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ' - . ~ f 1 44 4 ~ , F ' ~ ~ kl~ f~~~ 1~l~ ~ k. rr. i J + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ s.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ' r, ; e V 1 - ~ ; ~ _ '1~-~_' ~ ~ ; ~ } ~ y~ 1 " _ ~ , M1! V ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ f~ , ~Q ~ . . W--- : T ~ !I ~ f ` ~~L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' T ' ' ~RACY ~ 1 / ~ ~ . ~ ,1 ~ ;Si ~ v~' ~ ~ • ~+'~rr ~ ~ ' 4f\a I ~ i ~ ~ L I~ 1 I s 1 , f ~ ~ ~ ` - - - ~ ~~~Y,,,~ ~ 1' 1 ~ ~ ~ ti x I , ~ ~13 E 17 . ti g ~ - ~ I ~ J_~' _ A' Y 1~ V y_ F - ~ ;M 4~ ~ ' _ - -f r ^ I + ~ ~ ~ ,l ~ ~ ' i .~"•.-v ~ ~ . r , ' r ~ 4F ~ , 14 ~ 3 W , ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ ~~"~k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ d ~ f ~ 1 • ~ { ~ ~ ~ f ~ r , ~ f ~ , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` , S ` I ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; . - ~ ~2~D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 1 ~ S ~ ~ ~~E r,~.r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; r ~ , ~ ~ - ~ ~"[~vl,9f~1'"~ ' f r: ~ r ]:A ~ ' ~ ' ~ - ~ f ~ • y ' ~ ~ 4 ~ , ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ . + ~1~4~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , i~ L~.`~ ~ - J ~ LI ~ i ~ . } r ~ ~ ~ 1 n 4`~~I , r Fp ~ ~ 1 D , ~ r 18 ' ~ ~ ' ;f ' ~l~ ~ ~9..~ f .{I fA 4 ~ 'I I~ f _~_ti-.~1~ s..~~'' M r~ 7 t . ' ~ ° : ~ ~ ~ ~r ^~1 r~~ ~ r' ~ ~ - - ~ 1 ~ ' 1~, ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ - , r , t r i , 7 G~ 3 SANDU r 2 ~ J ~ ~ I~I i LAN E 2 7~ • `ti ~ ~ . ~ 2 . ,3 14 . 22 ~ ~L-_ - - - - - - - . - - - .,r L~pAl'T t~ rV TRACT " V ' I R1CT nG . , ' _ ~ 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING ^ 7`1 Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Time . ~ IPE Project No.: • Vveatner pa9e No. o~ Client Local Representative/ phone number "si General Contractor . e e esen ffV6 phon number Subcontractor r ' I E Project Manager/ 0ho e ~n ber IPE Field Representative . . Man ower & Equipment Used e-" ~ ~1/0/1/4 ok?.~ ' r t - ` Comments: (Work Completed Apparently Gil/ e per Speclficattons Problems their Solutions) i ; A' ¢ 0,7 t ~ . .,Irerr' e-% 7 , . ' ~ , / i~ 4 af'.~ /~r` f' D ! ..d `2 0007 ~,,,,,,•t~`~,.rr~~ ~ ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIYt CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. ~1 • . w. Date , Date j ,IPE C?NSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: 1 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: ~ IPE Project No. 1'age No. ot Comments: ~ (WoricCompletedApparently 400-40,0-~ per Specifications Pr+oblems ~ J' r/"-P ~ /t/ ~ ` and their Solutlons) f / /6 ,o a /,00 /o f ~4'... G~,--a / . / / 1 ! f Q .4g . ~ / ~ ~~.r► ~o ~ ~ ~ , i Ar ~ - ~ % `i J~-~~ -f e~e c c /v Ae; . 14- a ~ . / . ~ ' - ' t . //00-'/..~~' ~Ze.~~'-!.~ ~C,.2_. ` / r~r C, r' /~~~i'' Gtjo-~r~1 J ~ . i > ~dy1 / ~ • ~'ir l~ f'..{-' C1 ~ ~ : ~ z'.l ~ 1 r l,.l ~ ' ~ ~7 e ~C~!/l / /'~'r C' / G~.~ Lt1~40 r,c /W ~'-a ~4d 1` . . - ~ ~on ~ ~___il~-• . IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep r~ Y +.J •r ~ n. ~ ~ : ~ ` / / / ~ , . ~ ~ ~ 4 n„vVr r r ~ /101, '6- " . %lool~ ~ ~ •r.. ( \ \ f ~ _ , ~21)., ~ v,~,~~ ,1~'/ •.r , ,,.g" ~ ~ ,f ~ ~ p~►''~~ ; ; ~ 2~ , . ( . g 20 ~ 51o) IN~ 19 17 - lL. 14 13 u, ~ ~ ~ Cj ~ r- -r " . / , ` y' ! , - 1 ► Zp g ► ~ ` r ' ~ r 17 ~ r ~GOS1A 1~'NE , 10 1.11 1 16 ' 20 4 11 ~y 1 ~ ' ~r ' ~r i~' /'~/'....~~y-~ ~ ~ ~ yy ~ ~ I _`y_~~.,~~_ / ~ „J ' ~ - ~ ► _-3r' ~ 2 ► ~ ~ s-' ~ ~ ~e~ '~4I b r j ` y~~ ' ~ r~o ~ y • .,w 2.2 K, 14~ A6 13 , ~ t u' ~ ~ ~1 ~ q ~ .-4~ ~ n+> , TPAGj • ' ' r~ f 115 L ~ l - ' ~ `i' ^ t - ' wo„ woo--o ' . 1- , , " ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Eax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane-County Engineers - 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: January 10* 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: RiverwaZk 7th Description . . Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ M~ Work Authorization M X~ Report No. Copies . Description . 1 DailY InSpP_CtiO^ Revort #56 dated 12-31-96 . 0 PUI'pOSe . M XI Information r~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request NI Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks ~ , Signed : ~ - ' CC: DouF~Birch, Pzcific Proverties D'\TRNSMT.PMS INLANO PACIfiC DA1LY F1ELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Time ~ IPE Project No.: ODeafher page No. r ~ Client Loc I Repre entative/ phone number ~ ` General Con~ctor ` i e resen ve/ phone number Subcontractor IPE Project Mana erl phon nu ber .e``~-~S.~" IPE Field Representative~ ~e2 Manpow r Equipment Used } U~''i'~!rr ~ ~ . . Comments: (Wortc Completed Apparently rl / f/' i ~'a~ f+':"~~`~~ . ,~"'Z7 ~ C'~/~li^~• . ~)er Specificatfons Problems ' . ~ y> ind their Solutions) e.W 'Ja . r' l. s / C ; G? 7 ~ L5 a6 v 6f A 4 A,- e- A Xa Y 0 ~~a ~ ~i•/~!'i ~e. S ~.c~ K ~d`s.J~-•~ ~pxe-s f~at/ e a" _ IPE FIELD REPRESENT IVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructio~ engineer aqdlo'r IPE project manager. ;..L~•Date Date . . - • t~'r j f` f . IP/E CO rIlT R UCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MIANAGER G ~rponding Oeficiency Report No: • ~ 7 INLAND PACIFIC OAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERiNG Date J/ Inspector's Daily Report No.:S~~ IPE Project No. ' - Page No. ot c;2- Comments: ~~,~i'~D/'I /~'{~/`C /~~1•L - ~~~~~'9 ~c~ Ge~P (Work Completed Apparently l - Per SPeciflcaUons Problems D~ ~ ~l~ / ~ T'~ ~~r ~C1 ~~~t• / ~~%t7,~'" . and their Solutions) .~~r' l_' 0 i°~',~_-f ~~'a .:c ,~C'- -,S ~~•~~i~P~'' a~/94 .~G C'~~ 1~ c° . / d ~C /G ~ 6P/- x e ~ . /Xsl ~ . . ~~i~.•~ ~,~~'.sy! ~6T :''~~jJ~P~ . i /f/l'.~ /r/ ! ~ l~;~~' f . ~ ' / IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ ~ 0 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway- Avenue - DATE: February 7, 1997 "Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7th Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Dopments✓ M ~ Work Authorization LXJ Report No. Copies Descriptio,n _ 1 Daily Inspection Report"#S'7 dated 1=22-97.- a° . 1 Construction Punchli,s't,.dated 12-30-96. , - r . . , PLIIpOSe ' . . M XI Information MI Review & Comments MI Per Your Request M I Written Approval M I Signature & Return Remarks Signed: CC: (Dou\Dirch, Pacific Properties , D.ITRNSWi'.PMS ~ INLAND PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Ile ~ j . / ~ / J t ~ ~ . f f inspector's Daily Report No.: -rival Time ~ r IPE Project No.: _ c:~ eatner „ Nage ivo. . ot . Jent Local Representative/ phone number ~N 1' f ~ ~/~~J , ! 's -.,5► ,~~i .'..t ~ eneral Contractor ' Site Reffresentative/ phone number r ibcontractor IPE Project Mana er/ phoe nu,lnber . 13 ~ ' " a'% ~~"J E Field Representative . Lf lA * ~ • • ~'t ~ . w. E' anpower & Equipment Used ~ ,/~Y'~•~ //~rC It-t Cr r,_.~ C~ t~" r...: fr~f ~ t-~ ,t~ t~...-~.,r.r ~ ~ / /S y2~r r 7' ..+''°L! cr'~J . , • ,L omments• 1~,~ E' /oric Completed Appar.enUy r'~ ~ t f 0 ; f• -~:.r.~ ~r.*~C.~°t,/ • 720 :9 X~ ir Specifications Problems id their Solutions) /"D i 1,3 1"7 Q. X , ~ (a , ~ ;~e~) ~ f ~ • - • ~~c ~ 1 ; r ,~c'::~ ' ~U - 1 ~ , ! . t r::a ~ i ~ . ~ Ji ~A •'i' ~ . fG+ ~ F'~ J .J r'~ ~ • A• ~J~ ~e ~i"'~ • ~ .i i~ ~rI ~...j. f • :r . , _.1 _ ~Z . . . ~ i1, . e ✓ J..~ r J'C ~ e &~e t 14 - ~ ~ j - - Di-I eve IZ.~5 y`- ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ f ~ ~ o A,-~ G/" IeJli S /•1 Ai S./ ~ 7'c'~ /.•9~% l'i ti I G! ~'i 7- 4 /)h l° e T/ IPE FIELD REPRESE TIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the 1PE consbwtton. engineer.. nd/.or IPE project manager. . , Oate _ Date A _ I E C.S; ~UCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT M NAGER 'o • onding Defciency Report No: ~ ~ } 71NLAND ' PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ~ J ENGINEERING lat / Inspector's Daily Report No.: 3E Project No. / - Page No. ~ of ~ ~Cd 70 - ~ :omments: Nork Completed ApparenUy er SpecificaUons Problems ~r',~` ,#7 ~ .~i%'='/.~/,~ ~ C-~.~' ~ ~~~)l. ~ C~.,!: ~ nd their Solutions) ~ ~ rA )~~T ~ ~ t~~ ~ 1~`~cV ,rj ! .T l.••"' ~r y ~ ~ . ` ~ ~ t.s: ~ . _ ~ • ! c.~ ~ri ~ /~a1 6r o4. t,~ - L-/ L;2 ~~.+y 00 .~i~ leo- ~4~f~ ~ y'! . ~ .f'f r '~S.i?_~ / '"i J~ !f """z ~ ,~t :r+l~ ,Y~"rt fr! ''i~~ ` I I A* 4)P !/e ✓ ~o ~.1 ~ } . . , ~ ~ ~ . _ . G~~ ~j~ 4' /~l L{ '+r ~ •f 1 ~•+11 i . :'~j r~ .,d t^°A (J/ ~.e ~ ~ ~ : y ~ 1. C-S o ♦ i f'~ f'~ fj~~ {~.~..J~ +j'' 1`'9 ~ ~ ~ .,..3 +~r~ f~iP./,~~ ~1 ~C~ ,LJ C~ ~J ~j ..2, ' :•1 f 7 ,.t;.~.~ 1J ~ Joeks. /e,fS 1-,,2 ~'s' /Ur'1' i Z?101"l1 - , . . ~ „ ~a s= ~'s a.6~ve A ~~d ~ ~ 3 lo - . • t ~ ~ ~a . ~v ~ T J' c e- ~ (~°•~C ~i~ ;%t J r ~:~i•+ 'i iC :;~s: Cl~,~ ~"~f ' j3 t" G~ ~ " S. e/"/ --7 6 - a.-Z-s-o ~ -e--z, ~e0oog/ _F ~ ~~c e r4~;~ s / ~ w . ~ >/s~` 741 ~ ` . . ~ C,41 o .76-0' Z-A tv ~ ..~.¢t- , SC~~~'.DG/x '411 /1/; '-4~ r a h A000/ / A ~ ~ /zo J J • • - . 43 xe. XV-6~~. ! XA- ✓ ~ ~ IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 7 INLAND ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ~ ENGINEERING a Date Inspector's. Daily Report No.: - IPE Project No. wage No. ? ot S Comments: 14 ~ii P .5 l.~,1 el~ ,f ` (Work Compieted Apparently per Specificatfons Problems and their Solutions) Ca Q,i e C/ /7cf kJ fll /GJ Gt..J x • I c',' ~ - r • - Pt/ lc d . . 9. S T /7, l-7 Cc 0 7,0 1- a t...r ix 1-7 ~ u r, ~ f--G~~t c~ /C4 -1'/. / C~ S ~d ~a v~ h0 T - • ,DC~'I-~ ~t~u ~ ~ ~..T^ T/,~yt~ ~ . /•(/`C / ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ f,[>~' I'~ ~ . c ~ `,,f ~ 't-! 4d O X.//~ n ~ &c,J~% La... 640 ri e ~ ~~r`- :-d ~ I ` } , . _ / f"C niCJ / C".i ~f~. ~ t ! C~/C.1 ~ i~'. ~ ~ / / ~ B ~ ~ ~.S J'~O Non-Conforming Items: - ~ , / (Project or Standarcl Spec~cation ~ _ C7 f./~!d S lrc(7 Observed Construction is in ~Non-Compiiance with) I-r ~ / , '1 ¢9F' ~ !r E••! ~ t~► 9.. ?~t 0 7'_ ~ • ✓ ~ to r rh Pef lzS . , op i s /~L~~ ~ ~LLL.f' ~S~.S! • " ejCP ' c ' ~/~U /e~u ~3 f'l S Alleul~ IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 7 INLAND ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERMG. Oate _ p~ Inspector's Daily *Report No.: ! IPE Project No. - _ ' Page No. ~j of ~ / V Comments: "01,4~n /1 -114 ,%t^ ~ j~~► ~~c = d ~r '~i (Work Completed Apparently perSpecificaUonsProblems 0 _1Le-)~~ Ar'~~ .t f~• ~L---c.. ~ ¢~e.~t 1f~~P,•r,'•'~, and thefr Solutions) . T~Q tl ~ P/# ~ ~ ' !Y!~"i J~l~ t=r_•' ~ S ~ r .l~,.~ G() ~ ~ 1-~ , . ' ~ ^ / / ~ ~ / .''',y f•i'•') C/.:•! ~'t') iT ~i-7 ~l ~ ,6'tl~ -.000 i . . ~ s ~ c:, I ~ tr•^. % ~ _ ;i :'r t = ..~L 0 ~ ~~.~..a:.. ~ ,r► ~i'~'. r G✓ -5c7 1 / i~ Gc ~ i7r' ?V i'? /•/"i,, f'.:~- ~ /~,~Q ~.'lr t' ~ r i ~ ~ ~ t,f : C' ♦ 6•7 144 11 0,1 1 rO" t-2-t .CJ L.C. -4001, /r • r . ~ ~ o u . 74 cor _J:,~ /~I 1/Y~ / 1'? I t%% !~1 ~ r:~-` ; 7 ~ ~,C.. ~ a'~ ~l= • ~ ~>eoe <i yt 7~~' elt e a ,-to ~ r A,,► 7Zi 61-e ZIO'v 4-1 , u. ,aAo /~09 . . . + - • ~ ,~1G 1~~~~s l~ r ~~~G~,~=~. • - ~ . IVe114;~Ps 6v i IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 71NLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date 7 Inspector's Daily Report No.: d ~ IPE Project No. ~ Page No. ~ ot ~ . Comments: AV A4_ 41~J L_ (Work Completed Apparently / Z , per Specifications Problems G"~-y~ e. and their Solutions) v z . c4tle Ivol 1400) ~ Z9 #4 ~ ~~~s ~~b~ ~'~C-! /ir: ,~D' c~ : C3 v? .~~.~;1 ,1~ /d . / , . _ . _ ~ . Non-Conforming Items: (Project or Standard Specification - Observed Construction ts In Non-Compliance with) . r~ IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep w . Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist December 30, 1996 ~ . The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a guideline, it may not include all aspects of the construction as many items are not identifiable due to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction and backfill of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compaction and backfill. 8. Install Type III barricades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) Schedule II: Sanitary Sewer (See Spokane County letter dated 11/26/96) 1. 8" P.V.C. Sewer Pipe; . A) All sewer lines are to be recleaned from rocks and debris. B) All sewer lines must be-re-T.V.'d. _ 2. 48" Manhole Type 1-485; A) Adjustment rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. „ B) Manholes must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. 3. 48" Manhole Type 1-48D (over 10') - A) Adjustment rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. B) Manholes must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. 4. P.V.C. Side Sewer Services A) The lots listed, per Pacific Properties letter dated 12/24/96, require the side service to be verified for actual depth, Lots 12, 13, 14, and- 15, Block 7; L-ot 1, Block 5; Lots 1& . 2, Block 7. B) The lots listed require extensions-to 10' behind the right of way and marked in accordance with the plan set, Lot 9, Block 2, Lot 7, Block 1, and Lot 6, Block 4. C) The tee or wye location for Lot 19, Block 1 needs to be located for the as-built drawings. Schedule III: Storm Drainage 2. Filtration swales A) All swales need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' Ponds A) All `208' ponds need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist page 2 ~ B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or _ sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. C) All drywells and outlet structures within ponds or swales require adjustrnent to the proper elevation. D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond "RT". - E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; A) All drywell adjustment rings require grout. . B) All drywell metal frame and grates require grout. C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: - C.i) The Type B drywell in Pond "K" needs to be removed and replaced due to the barrel sections being placed too high, and the concrete cap conflicting with the design pond bottom elevation.. . C.ii) The Type B drywell in Pond "L" needs to be removed and replaced due to the same reasons listed above.. C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate, and to be cleaned out due to excess material falling into the opening. C.iv) The -inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires grouting around inlet and outlet pipe. The drywell needs to be cleaned out and a metal frame and grate-installed. C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. C.vi). The inlet and drywell. combination im Pond "Y 1" requires-the same items, mentioned" - above, and to be exposed. The drywell is buried under a stockpile of spoil material. C.vii) The drywell in Pond "B" needs to be exposed and adjusted. Drywell is buried. C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. C.ix) Pond "J" drywell requires a metal frame and grate. C.x) Pond "I" drywell needs to be exposed and adjusted. 5. Spokane County Standard Curb Inlet Type 2: A) One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb . inlet needs to be installed. 6. Concrete inlet Type 1 A) All inlet and outlet pipes need to be grouted, as well as adjustment rings and grates. B) Adjustment to final grade must be completed after final grading of pond or swale. (all) C) Inlets must be protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all inlets) ~ J D) Asphalt apron around inlet at station 24+73 Lt., Salmon River Lane is required. a Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist page 3 Schedule IV: Water System .5. Fire Hydrant Assembly; all require backfilling and compaction. 6. 1" Water Services require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) 8. 1" Irrigation Taps require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A - final wallc through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; , A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfi)1.' C) Broken or rejected curb must be repiaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. . 3. Sidewalk: - - A) All sidewalk is. required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. - B) Install all wheelchair-ramps Per SPokane County Standard Detail A-4. Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement 2. Interior Roads; A) Minimum density and. depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets. The penalty and resoiution to this item may be negotiated between the contractor and sponsor. (See Petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 18, 1996. Copy attached) B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. Schedule VII: Utility Trenching 1. Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. A) Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. B) Coordinate with W:W-:P: for street light placement. C) Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. D) Coordinate with U.S. West for pedestal installation. Miscellaneous Items: A) Piles of garbage, concrete, and asphalt need to be removed from interior plat locations and tracts. ~ u • , • , V• . B) Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County... ~ 4 . . 0 ~ 7 ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: March 14, 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7th Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing. Contract Documents I~ M~ M~ Work Authorization M g ~ Report No. Copies Description 1 Dailv Inspection Renorts #58 throuRh #63 covPrinQ the veriod 3-4-97 throuszh 3-13-97. PLIIpOSe M gI Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks ~ . Signed: ~ CC: ~ou~ irch,, Pacif ic Proverties D:ITRNSMT.PMS "4111111111 INLAND PACIFIC D AILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING ;71`r_ Date g Inspector's Daily Report No.: . ~ •~.s " A Arrivai Time IPE Project No.: 19co070 / ea er . , ~ Nage ivo. ot . - • ~~c / ~ Client Local Representative/ phone number 4::: ~I,g- "fC~.~ 7 Sit Fte e~t+ve/ fio number 6 ~ 7G~ ~ 2,66 6~ General Contrac r l ~ ~ ~ p~/~`._~~ pG/ e,/`e -s 1.4' ~ Subcontractor I{~E P ~ect Mana erl phone- ber tA. Ct , ~ iPE Field Representative =QLA y Man ower & Lquipment Used ~ L4 1411 cr r4,1A-- ~ eW T oQ S/Y Pt t r ~Pv~ Comments: /,1 f (Wortc Completed Apparently perSpeciflcatlons Problems and theirSolutions) ~ y r~ ~ r'T f'14 et- Xe if ,i''P° 1.) GwJ e-i 5 ,r,-i ~ l60 j " / , / sr / /v,~ J 5~~ Ac /~•t 14 C.I. (~W l~Cd l'~°r'~ T~ l~ t~P ,l~B .►A. ~ ' / / ~ ~`~J !~-tl ~ ~ __UJ G~[S - ~ ,if IWR tlt 0-f, ~ • l • ~~L • " ' I 77~r T r ~ . . •e~" IPE FIELD REPRESEN Z VE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE const ruction engine r and/or IPE project manager. , Date % Date ~ j 'PE ~NSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER 1 . Co. _ .,sponding Deficiency Report No: 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date inspector's Daily Report No.: IPE Project No.' ' page No. ot l rZG :S 7~.~1~~ ~ Comments: 7`'4 (Wortc Completed Apparently per Specificataons Problems `,0 S / ~A. !-t- /'M q 5 0~,7 ~ Xo- ~~~%t~. r and their Solutions) - `y'~`•/_ T - . ~ P' ~.l r~ ~I ` c? ~ ~ ~~I ~ //v 4,24 1,41 1~&3,t~ ~ 1`/.I i' vi el D ~ 1 ~ (41/1 ~r~~ ~ i H ~ ~ ~S" U_~ a l.I` ~ ~ O ♦ ✓ lnl '!40ia~•!° /t af~L•fsiFt ,~i! : ~ ~ ~ ~ /r' ~ ~t. -t~-/~ ~ ~'I. Ct'.~tJ C ` '~,6r► A Y~l=- ~ ~ rca ~►~t ra / l.t / / ~ l A .5 = ,D /~f S/ LC.. 4. ~ ~~.S~l~~d~ yc. a ve g / ~ ~ 17l /S7 Y G /t ~c .100 100'4 eO S Ae e 6l C/~,' Prl! /PJ1'N,4,A J/r^ "&s 7. ..~J % '~i. ~ ~G► q ~ r2 ~ ~ ~ 'j;7 ~ - 4k` IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep r. _ ~~C.' V ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist December 30, 1996 The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a guideline, it may not include all aspects of the construction as many -items are not identifiable-due- -to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction and backfill of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compaction and backfill. 8. Install Type III barricades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) Schedule II: Sanitary Sewer (See Spokane County letter dated 11/26/96) (o 8" P.V.C. Sewer Pipe; 1 sewer lines are to be recleaned from rocks and debris. All *sewer lines must be re-T.V.'d. e 2. 48" Manhole Type 1-48S; A) Adjustment.rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. &Manholes must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. - • 3. 48" Manhole Type 1-48D (over 10') A Adjustment rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. anholes must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. - 4. P.V.C. Side Sewer Services . The lots listed, per Pacific Properties letter dated 12/24/96, require the side service to be verified for actual depth, Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block 7; Lot 1, Block 5; Lots 1& 2, Block 7. ~The lots listed require extensions to 10' behind the right of way and marked in accordance with the plan set, Lot 9, Block 2, Lot 7, Block 1, and Lot 6, Block 4. C) The tee or wye location for Lot 19, Block 1 needs to be located for the as-built drawings. Schedule III: Storm Drainage CE)Filtration swales ~O"o-A) All swales need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. - - B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded_ per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. ~ `208' Ponds A) All `208' ponds need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. . : ~ R.iverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist . ~ page 2 B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or - sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. C) All dr.ywells and outlet structures within ponds or swales require adjustment to the proper elevatiun.. . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond "RT". E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; A) All drywell adjustment rings require grout. B) All drywell metal frame and grates require grout. C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric ~between the metal frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: C.i The Type B drywell in Pond "K" needs to be removed,and replaced due to the barrel sections being placed too high, and the concrete cap conflicting with the design pond bottom elevation.. - r C. ' The Type B drywell in Pond "L" needs to be removed and replaced due to the same - C~o reasons listed above.. C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate, and to be cleaned out due to . excess material falling into the opening. . " C.iv) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires grouting around inlet and outlet pipe. The drywell needs to be cleaned out and a metal frame and grate installed. , C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. - C.vi) The inlet and drywell combination'in Pond "Y1" requires•the same items mentioned above, and to be exposed. The drywell is buried under a stockpile of spoil material. C.vii) The drywell in Pond "B" rieeds to be exposed and adjusted. Drywell is buried. . C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the .grate. C.ix) Pond "T' drywell requires a metal frame and grate. C.x) Pond "I" drywell needs to be exposed and adjusted. 5. Spokane County Standard Curb Inlet Type 2: A) One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to-be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. 6. Concrete inlet- Type 1 A) All inlet and outlet pipes need to be grouted, as well as adjustment rings and grates. B) Adjustment to final grade must be completed after final grading of pond or swale. (all) C) Inlets must be protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all ~ inlets) D) Asphalt apron around inlet at station 24+73 Lt., Salmon River Lane is required. i~k 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist ;hedule N: Water System _ -Fire Hydrant Assembly; all require backfilling and compaction. I" Water Services require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) - 1" Imgation Taps require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) ,hedule V: Curb and Gutter;- Sidewalk VertiGal curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; , A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. :_-B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is-completed. . Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the. apron •poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage dunng backfill. ~ ; C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A - final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. Sidewalk: All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick; include mailbox wraps. Install all wheelchair ramps per Spokane County Standard Detail A-4. n , hedule VI: RoadBase and Pavement : Interior Roads; A) Minimum density and depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets. - . The penalty and resolution to this item may be negotiated between the'contractor and- f~:::I-,•~::3: sponsor. (See Petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 18, 1996. Copy attached) , B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing , under heavy loads of traffic. i ' hedule VII:-Utility Trenching - Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. A) Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. . B) Coordinate with W. W.P, for street light placement. . C) Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. D) Coordinate with U.S. West for pedestal installation. - . s. . scellaneous Items: A) Piles of garbage, concrete, and asphalt need to be removed from interior plat locations _...and tracts. ~ . ~ Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. iCoordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. , - ~ a : . s 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING ~ elke~ a - ~ Date Inspector's Oaily Report No.: Arrival Time ~ IPE Project No.: lrveatner Page i9o. o~ Client Local RepresentaUve/ one number , ~ Q~3~ 3 General Contractor Site epresen tive! phof~ e number t'_,~ e.--no s~`' n c~ r~.,~ Subcontractor IPE P oject Managerlphone number IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used / I"'~'. f`Oi.:~7 Gl Comments: (Work Completed Apparently ~ ~'c/~P < ♦ ry~Y T.'3 ~ . J`C~ ~l S ~.1"': ,/~P per Specifications Problems and their Solutions) /~,0 ' f " • > ~/hy S . ~p~it rt Gl 10 D t~l ~ /j / T -A el p /1.c t~ ~6 v\ 5 -P,-,74' /Z> 1• ^-e- rY AM ia- ltrJ400f ,i n ~ :r C~ ~ ~ l~ ,r~ ~ ~a 7"1- o A a c,rP. ~ ' D ~.e ~ e.-2- ;,1 ~f - IPE FIELD REPRESENTATt E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE. This document and referenced addenda are to be_considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor IPE project manager. - Date Date IP~'COVSTRUCTION ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER / fesponding Deficiency Report No: 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING . Date Inspector's Daily Report No.:~ IPE Project No. 70^ Page No. of ~ , Comments: 6, e U . n,n Ivo t~ah o- (Woric Completed ApparenUy ~ per Speciflcations Problems D I/~ ~ ~d_1~s.C~' ~ r'!✓~ C/ c-Lbe. and their Solutions) " ' • / x) o . n de, 14 - ~ ~ Q u ~/70 tn i ~~e,~ tA14n .1- . ~ X f GcJ e r ~ r { / e J o t.~ C~t~. c~C I'~~ si O. r.; Gv-e!l r /l ,1'i-c. ~ i ~ eJt' s l-'.t~ ~ . •Y.~, ~ ~ f ' ' _ . . , , . . • Y , . . - 1 • Non-Conforming items: (ProJect or Standard Speciflcatlon Observed Constructton is in NorrComplfance with) - ~~C~► ~-C.~ . IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep . ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist December 30, 1996 The items listed below are prelirninary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a guideline, it may not include all aspects of the construction as many- items- are not identifiable due to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction and backfill of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compaction and backfill. 8. Install Type III bamcades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) . , . ~.chedule II: Sanitary Sewer (See Spokane County lettertdated 11/26/96) P.V.C. Sewer Pipe; All sewer lines are tb be recleaned from rocks and debris: , . _ All sewer lines must be re-T.V.'d. " - ' - . 2. 48" Manhole Type 1-48S; , . - - A) Adjustment rings, iniets_and outlets on manholes must be grouted. _ ~ Manholes must be cleaned of a11 rocks and debris. ~ 3. 48" Manhole Type 1-48D (over 10') ' A) Adjustment rings, inlets arid outlets on manholes must be grouted. ~ Manholes must be cleaned of all , rocks and debris. ' . 4: P.V.C. Side Sewer Services ~j The lots listed, per Pacific Properties letter dated 12/24/96, require the side service to be verified for actual depth, Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block 7; Lot 1, Block 5; Lots 1& 2, Block 7. V The lots listed require extensions to 10' behind the right of way and marked in accordance with the plan set, Lot 9, Block 2, Lot 7, Block 1, and Lot 6, Block 4. C) sThe tee or wye location for Lot 19, Block 1 needs to be located for the as-built drawings. Schedule III: Storm Drainage q iltration swales - 6%)q--A) All swales need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. - - - B) All swales needto fine graded, compacted and seeded. per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3 208' Ponds Pd ~,~s A) All `208' ponds need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. (A (4, ~ ~ ~ - ~ Q Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist . page 2 B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 1.1 of 13. Cj- All dr.ywells and~ outlet"stn.ictures within ponds:or swales-require adjustment to the: - proper elevation.~ . . . . . . _ _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . : _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . : D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond «R'r) E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; - A) All drywell adjustment rings require grout. . B) All drywell metal frame and grates require grout. C) All drywelis need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: _ C.i The Type B drywell in Pond "K" needs to be removed and replaced due to the barrel sections being Placed too high, and the concrete cap conflicting with the design pond bottom elevation.. . vo ~ii) The Type B drywell in Pond "L" needs to be removed and replaced due to the same : lp~ ,~~:...~,..J . ~a reasons listed above.. C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate, and to.-be cleaned out due to excess material falling.into the opening. _ C. iv) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires grouting around inlet and outlet pipe. The drywell needs to be cleaned out and a metal frame and grate installed. C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. C.vi) The inlet and drywell combinatiori in Pond "Y1" requires the same items mentioned above, and to be exposed. The drywell is buried under a stockpile of spoil material. C.vii) The drywell in Pond "B" rieeds to be exposed and adjusted. Drywell is buried. C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. ) Pond "J" drywell requires a metal frame and grate. Pond "I" drywell needs to be exposed and adjusted. . . 5: Spokane County Standard Curb Inlet Type 2: A) One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. _ 6. Concrete inlet- Type 1 _ A) All inlet and outlet pipes need to be grouted, as well as adjustment rings and grates. . B) Adjustment to final grade must be completed after final grading of pond or swale. (all) C) Inlets must be protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all inlets) D) Asphalt apron around inlet at station 24+73 Lt., Salmon River Lane is required. Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist ~ page 3 ~ Schedule IV: Water System 5. FireHydrant Assembly;. all require backfilling and compaction._._____ 6. 1" Water Services require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) 8. 1" Irrigation Taps require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. . B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; - A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the.apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill: C) Broken or rejected curb+ must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: A) All sidewalk is required -to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. . . B) Install all wheelchair ramps per Spokane County Standard Detail A-4: Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement 2. Interior Roads; A) Minimum density and depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets. The penalty and resolution to this item may be negotiated between the contractor and sponsor. (See Petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 18, 1996. Copy - attached) B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. Schedule VII:-Utility Trenching C9 Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. - A)-Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. M55- B) Coordinate with W.W.P. for street light placement. C) Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. D) Coordinate with U. S. West for pedestal installation. - c e) P - - Miscellaneous Items: - - A) Piles of garbage, concrete, and asphalt need to be removed from interior plat locations and tracts. . B} Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. 7 INLAND - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT 1 ENGINEERING 7/k ~ ~ Date Inspector's Daily Report No.:~~ - ~V Arrival Time i 30 IPE Project No.: ~6d ~ Weather Page No. ~ oT Z/~ ( oS,.rJ Client Local Representative/ phone number 'o"~i o-"~pt~ . General Contractor ~ i~e Re ~ es t've/ ho L ne p umber +tJP ~ eux6 6 - 5 79i1 Subcontractor ` IPE Project Man r/ phon num er ~ IPE Field Representative Man ower & Equipment Used ~ L1~~ ~ /~'v Comments: " . ~ 1 (Work Completed Apparently perSpeciflcations Problems aridthefrSolutions) ~/~p C, u.lGtn 1o~r S~ t p ~ . Cl-to/~ At ^-v w fitJ P e-i ~ S c-r (Jr r!/ 5-r a Gt Cc. / ~ ' 0~- ~i <S I`r) L, 4ti e ot, tA-Cl CY I /e, 16 11 i& e/m//a 4. fi' 'o-7 e lw S Pw t/J' A.,C~ 1,40 ~O Ze e 4 . . ► ~ ~ ~ C.) r-e S--t-4 /ASO- Y'O -1A OP ajVA09e0gree-4:~~ Ao lae-., IPE FIELD REPRES, ATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor IPE project manager. ; Date Date , . -3 IP CO,!~&RUCTION ENGINEER , IPE PROJECT tVIANAGER 0~,~5ponding Deficiency Report No: ~ irvLatvo . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT I ENGINEERING Date za A Inspector's Daily Rep rt No.: a~e~ IPE Project No. ' Page No. of _ C2 40 Comments: Q~ rt,%z 70 ~2L z; A o,r^~'~` D t~ i~),k- r ~ (Woric Completed Apparently perSpecificationsProblems ~'/`n Co ~ ~~t° C~~ r i T-G~,~ and their Solutions) w e G~ ,N~,~~ bo- #0-01 i/J ~ 6~ ' &(ZLZl a- LI ) 7 f/~+Lc / / ~~e 1174- / 4. . ~ , . Non-Conforming Items: - (Project or Standard Specification ' Observed Constructton is in Non-Compliance with) IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep RIVERWALK 7TH FIELD REPORT #60 0 ' PAGE 3 OF $r(p 10 MARCH 97 VOLUME VOLUME POND REQUIRED PROVIDED o C 177.0 224.8 D 209.0 279.0 F 335.0 385.0 I 451.0 594.6 J 479.0 561.1 K 206.0 322.0 L 307.0 450.0 M 222.0 373.6 N 242.5 247.0 O 320.0 413.3 , RT 895.0 1010.0 S 194.0 269.5 U 542.0 472.5 V 540.0 551.3 0 0 - . . 8 Y ~ - IC) . ~ Riverwalk 7th Addrtion - Construction Punchlist December 30, 1996 The items listed below are preliminarY in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a guideline, it may not include all'aspects ofthe construction as many items are not identifiable due to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction and backfill of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compaction and backfill. 8. Install Type III bamcades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) , , . . Schedule II: Sanitary Sewer (See Spokane County letter dated 11/26/96) - - 1. 8" P.V.C. Sewer Pipe; All sewer lines are to be recleaned from rocks.and debris. . All sewer lines must be re-T.V.'d. . 2. 48" Manhole Type 1-48S; ' A) Adjustment rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. Manholes must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. - 3. 48" Manhole Type 1-48D (over 10) A) Adjustment rings, inlets and outlets on manholes must be grouted. ~daol6s must be cleaned of all rocks and debris. 4. P. e Sewer Services ,(SbThe lots listed, per Pacific Properties letter dated 12/24/96, require the side service to be verified for actual depth, Lots 12, 13, 14, and 15, Block 7; Lot l, Block 5; Lots 1& 2, Block 7. The lots listed require extensions to 10' behind the right of way and marked in accordance with the plan set, Lot 9, Block 2, Lot 7, Block 1, and Lot 6, Block 4. C) The tee or wye location for Lot 19, Block 1 needs to be located for the as-built drawings. Schedule III: Storm Drainage 2. Filtration swales -r~4 P~-•%~' c%~A) All swales need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. . B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' onds ~ (VAII `208' ponds need to be rough graded to allow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or sod placement. r'~~ • ~ 7 ~ ' . y - . . • : ~ r . . , ~ ~ ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist page 2 B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. All drywells and outlet.structures within ponds or swales require adjustment to the ~ proper elevation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . : 3 D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond "RT". E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; A) All drywell adjustment rings require grout. B) All drywell metal frame and grates require grout. . C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal -frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: ~j The Type B drywell in Pond "K" needs to be removed and replaced due to the barrel sections being placed too high, and the concrete,cap conflict'ing with the design pond bottom elevation.. The Type B drywell in Pond "L" needs to be removed and replaced.. due to the same reasons listed above.. ~ C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate, and to be cleaned out due to excess material falling into the opening: C.iv) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires grouting around inlet and outlet pipe. The drywell needs to be cleaned out and a metal frame and grate installed. C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. , . , . - C.vi) The inlet and drywell combination* in Pond "Y1" requires the same items mentioned above, and to be exposed. The drywell is buried under a stockpile of spoil material. C.vii) The drywell in Pond "B" needs to be exposed and adjusted. Drywell is buried. C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. ) Pond "T" drywell requires a metal frame and grate. Pond "I" drywell needs to be exposed and adjusted. 5. Spokane County Standard Curb Inlet Type 2: A) One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. 6. Concrete inlet Type 1 - A) All inlet and outlet pipes need to be grouted, as well as adjustment rings and grates. B) Adjustment to final grade must be completed after final grading of pond or swale. (all) _ C) Inlets must be protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all . inlets) i ~ D) AsPhalt aPron around inlet at station 24+73 Lt., Salmon River Lane is renuired. f, / , ~ Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist -page 3 Schedule-IV: Water System 5. Fire Hydrant Assembly; all require backfilling and compaction. b. 1" Water Services require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) 8. 1" Imgation Taps require backfill and markers for future locates. (all) Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be'protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curbiinlets -need1fie apron poured. . - B) Curb needs to be protected from'damage.during backfill. ' C) Broken or fejected curb must.be replaced prior to acceptanceby Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: A) All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. r °i- t B) Install all wheelchair ramps per Spokane County Standard Detail A-4. ' ~ - . . - • J Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement 2. Interior Roads; . A) Minimum density and depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets. The penalty and resolution to this item may be negotiated between the, contractor and sponsor. (See Petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 182 1996. Copy attached) B) Edge of asphalt need to be pr.otected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. Schedule VII:-Utility Trenching 1. Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. b A) Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. B) Coordinate with W.W.P. for street light placement. C) Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. -D) Coordinate with U.S. West for pedestal installation. _ ~ - Miscellaneous Items: N - A) Piles of garbage, concrete, and asphalt need to be removed from interior plat locations and tracts. . B) Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. C) Coordinate with inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD-REPORT ENGINEERING . . . Oate : Inspectoc's Daily Report No.: ~ /hz1CwVe /9 710 Arrival Time ~ IPE Project No.. . ea er _ -r - ,k rage ivo. or . ~ Ciient Loca! Representative/ phone number cA Zz4vae/%pone ite e esenumtier General Contractor p r.~, - ~T?q Subcontractor iP Project Mana erl phone nu E IPE Field Representative ~ri ~11'I+, 1 / ! 1 Man ower & E uipment Used ~ ~ ~ . , . 2-511e,^- Comments: ~ Q b S 1~P (Woric Completed Apparently 42e perSpecificationsProblems 'theirSolutions) 'AYl -S 3 /..J ~ !I-n ,r ~ ~_;r~ 4'..~ ,~r ~ r!~ ~ 4 ~ T47A d rk1%4y d ~ ~ -~a eA e-P ~ rA cf' ~ i' s 7'L~.~ .I . l~` ~ ~ . ~1 e,.p C 7V.,e LIA Zltl~ ~r C) n- ° /740 iPE FIELD REPRESE IVE CONTRACTOR'S RE?RESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary unUl reveiwed and signed by the lPE construction engineer and IPE project manager. Oa e ' Date IP ON RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT INANAGER 171 Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING • ~ , ~(i ~,1~ Date ~ Inspector's Daily Report No. IPE Project No. ~ Page No. 11-2 of / Comments: (Work Compieted Apparentiy _ / per Specificatlons Probiems •7lA l`'~ ~L.c-~ ~0 and their Solutions) NO ('u f' /VtiPi,m- 4 ~ (~iG! ~ r rt ~~LC'r ~l t S 1~ ~ f'* ~ - - ~ Non-Conforming Items: . (Project or Standard Specification . Observed Construction is in Non-Compliance with) 41L IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELO REPORT ENGINEER:ING. ~ 7 - . . . . . tJ . Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Time ~ ` / IPE Project No.: . . ~ 70 ea er ~ rage ivo. oT ' Client Loolc Representative/ phone number - Generai Cohtractor ~ i epr en v p o e number ~i~ s?# 5'~~' - ~79 y Subcontractor PE Project Manager/ phone number _ ~ cx ~ IPE Field Representative / I:~ . ~~G~ti► ~`1~"/ Wr Man o er & Equipment Used -r00~__ ~~.~'l j /a -~J~ ,l~~ r_..-• ~C' '0051;". ` - ' ...,•r~. ; _ . ~ ~7 41) ~ ~ ~;;s~ c ~ y► ~ ~i,.,-•.~ ~/f d 7r . Comments: (Wor1c Completed Apparently lop? 57.i /Q ft7 • C.~'~.ti . .-~S • .5.~~1J"~ "peciflcatlons Problems heir SoluUons) _L&7 ~ T- ` 1.~... • / ~ .G~Lew~L~/ . ~l~.e f ~.~L.l.CJ /1 J~C3l I _ . . ~ _ , ~ . , . S 64,1ale,s- eor~x iW / ss i-d 4 % XL . _ . 1,AJ 94-- 0 8 IPE FIELO REPRESEN~IVE - CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construc '0n engineer and/or IPE project manager. Date . Date r , IPt CON TRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER / ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: INLAND PACIFIC []AILY F[ELD REPORT . ENGINEERING . - - ` ~ Date Inspector's Daily Repor# No::~ ~ Anritral Tim ~ IPE Project No.: ~-20P~ ea ffier . . _ _ , 'Page ila. of--. 444 Client 2 ~ Lacal Representa#ivef phone nurnber General Coniractar i e pr" en v p one numper -579 -el Subcantractar [PE Project Nlanag 1 phone num~ - . tPE Fiead Represeratative ~ - 14`lanpower & Equipment'Used ' ~ - +~I PJA." /tF 1~1.. ~~~1.~.~,~~' j~7 ~ ~ • _ ~ ~ - Camments. . (V11ark Cortrpleted Apparent(y 'Oe' s ~ . ~ ' , ~ perSpecificativrrs Problems ~ry f 4tIGLr So114tioY1s) ~}y ~ ~ ~ ~1..f•~ ~ ~ - • '1' ~ k Z e C.7 "4 ~ . . , . 7Z.71 xr. ~ ~ , . . 1 . ~ IPE FfELD REPRESEN__•.; ` - - CONTRA►C70R'S REPRESEN7►4T1VE This dacument and referericed addenda are ta be considered preliminary un#il reveiraved and signed [ay the IPE constru ction engineer, dtar. IPE Project rnanager. Date Date ~ 40,'E c ~STRuCTIOr~ ENGtNE6R ~ tPE PRaJECr i~ANAGER , ~ . . ~ Correspanding aeficiency Report Na: 7 INLAND , - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORI ENGINEERING 71 . ite inspector's Daily Report No.: •rival Time IPE Project No.: ` aatner rage ivo. / or , . ,ent Loca! Representativel phone number : [~rc. :neral ContraCtor n e Repsentativone mber 'be ~h~~u p ~ ~-S 7?~ - ~~L. ~ bcontractor IPE Proje t Manager/ phone n mber : Fieid Representative Xp ~rr/e~e wer & Equipment Used ' ~ . 1 /G/ . :TU~ ~O'~~ ~T ✓ C~ / C~IZP/I` ♦ /t /T'/ Q~/ / ~D ~ e r (nments: rk Completed Apparently el- O'/? ~b Gt,4o, SpecificaUons Problems _ ~lutions) CJ• ~~~,hr ~ ~Gh c~-t ~~T ~~7`'Pp~ ~~~.30/ ~ ~ ~ • . ope ~'L4J(1l'Gt- /4~ ~ ,ibGt-~ . s r l ~o `tyi i ~ ho i~ ~-C. S ~Gz~ ~~e.. ~i o.c 2""4 ~Gl h /t.o 14. l.cJ /P X(' e SS7 A/Y O: r' tnI~ j-, 0 t~ r! l~i.J ~G~ l Q' K. Q`7L ' . _ , ~ , . d/ ~ i lL'a,~~~ /~~G•-~'~ i~~~~~~te~' ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ v~ ~ . , . . p - 'f' ~ !PE FIELD REPRESEN AT TIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE ; . 'his document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE : onstructio,n.engineer a dlor IPE project manager. Date Oate ~ ~r~ 4 t;~1"'~+' ~/~~+J ~ J`C' ~ ~ ~ ~t> ~~~L[! ' ~~f~ ' Lnf ' IP CON~STRUCTION ENGINErER IPE PROJECT fUTANAGER r/ . ~ -esponding Deficiency Report No: ' ~ . ~1 INLAND _ : . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORI _ ENGINEERING. : ~ . • . Gt/C~ 44~ Oate " Inspector's Daily Report No.: /~"~1~~ i`~~~~ - ~-s - Arrival Time . . ~ . IPE Project No... ea er i-age ivo. oir Cllent f` Local Representat3ve/ phone number Generai Contractor i e e sentativel phone n ber . 414r~i.~r;~ -LO-to", n.y Ce --5z6x Subcontractor~ IPE Proj~ ~t Mana er/ hor nu beE ~u1 o.r-~Y. P ~ . IPE Field Representative c 000 - Man wer & Equipment Used , - V.- - -e , /.X Comments: • r (Worit Completed Apparentiy 1'J/' I c/Lej~ .v - Q~SP ~/`e s~i''~~~P: •Specifcations Problems , r: ~ their Solutions) ~ (PU v1 G 3 ~ ~~t 4o. ~ /;S/Sd ef 4.4 T . P ~ t6c c np u. G4 ~ /'~.c~ 6 r ~s ~ i7~ c~G s u 7-.0 Cc t--t_c.P (I c,- le.c. /arAr-P 7~Xe- 1,o1c)/w 7-4 G~ ~ ~'GAA ° eG! ~a ( c.c..vY~~ > i '~4 7'~~... .~tf ~ X _ C~ r~L~~~ ~ /~O ~G~I ~ . Pd ~ ~ ~~~LC~ P v~•~~ ~L i*,~ . ~'~s f/'~ Cl;~~ ~i. ~~rt / ~?Gi S~. ~'lii.Q H ~ x t+~ i/Q ~l d r, ~ CP ~ r'c° ~ . . c., ~AS ✓ r~ ~ . ~ IPE FIELD REPRESEN TIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATII/E This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor IPE project manager. ~ Date Date r ) U~ ~i. } ~ ,v / ' __Y ~~~G - i`PE ONSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: FjeLD IREPO~T : ~ NO s laily Repoa-E No. /2 izl`~ f InsPe~~'°r . PAC~~~~ °f ' . , ENGINE~R~ aage o ~ ,,e -9~"~ rr ~ ~ • ' ~ . t ~o• ~ p ro~e'~ ~ r~- . a 'Omm ornP eted ApP b ecr►s 6L- ~f * W°~C ctfica'~o~s,PrO • h~- 1►-~ per C. Soluttcns~ ~ . y4.4e,, j . ~ 100`-d and 10 ` ~ . l ' , t in- ~1 '~f ~ • ' ~i~ . C • ~ ~ ~ , lq ~ ~'~-~i~ 1A~ r n t e Ct, L ~ A 1~ 1 a / ~~G~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ _ • ~ ~ Y • ~ . ' ~ G ; ~ - . ~ . . - ~ , . r • ' . • - . ~ ' . - - • , ~ i ~ . • ~ ~ ~ . - ' i , tor' S peP . C . . ~ _ 1pE pM r 1PE F,ald Rep . ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC NUCLEAR GAUGETEST RESUI 1 ENGINEERING,~. PcLq~c,3 o: Job Name (~cJa/e I PE Job No. W.O. # Q J 3° A~ Field Reaort No.. Date 171:WG~rC S Tech. DS= 3 8(,, qq CG M S = / 7GJfO , Test Ft Below Wet Moisture Dry Max Percent Pass A GE No. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density Density. Compaction or (PCF) (PCF) ~ F~il C Su IPf -pQ /39-5 UIocO Ma _ _ . ~ 3 rLs4 c. ` 13d. J5- Co. . . . . (H►a ~ , per • ana . ' _ ' - • • f 1 . (.I ' r ' • ~ . s i . e7 . • ~ t . . ~ T C v ~ • CQ{ h ♦ ai ~ 79111110 INLAND - PACIFIC - ~ DAILY FIELD REPOR' e r. ENGINEERING, Date • Inspector's Daily Report No.: . Arrival Time IPE Project No.. QQea~her page No. or Ciient Local Representative! pho number ~ C one mber General Contractor. ~,~e~ese Uv p U~t~l tS ~`S..-~-7~ ~ Subcontractor 1PE roct Mana ! phone ~umb ~.~a . r . IPE Fieid Representative f/)JA s` ~ O ~/MI / 7 / • = / ' ~ Man ower & Equipment Used ~ l . ~ .•~,,5 ~i ~ /~d~.~~~ ~ ~ ~w.~ D r.~1 ~ ~ ~~~'SU~/'~ . r Comments: (Work Completed Apparently a/ C- Specifications Problems 1 / / their Solutions) "3~/~ ac ~ y o . r -Z/f /P 1 s /Z~. )6 G C/ l'erua,'r~.j / A ~,uJ ~ /L1 G{-vc G<.~G~. t~ ~/.cP ~Gi I-Ae Il ~-a . . 7 Ze x. ! l f. o f--i l4 ~ ~L° ~ 4C;o-,4v2) L . I ~~ii~~:'r. ir .,?.~►"'r ' ~IPE FIEI.D REPRESENTA VE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATiVE This document and referenced addenda are to be cons'idered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project rnanager. Date " Oate C Ic; . ; . - t~L~ f ' . 1f''E COiVSTRUCTION ENGlNEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER ~ . ~ U ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ' 71NLAND . PACIFIC DAlLY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date tnspector's Oaily Report No.:~ 19'MaI2 9 T . IPE Project No. page No. ot ~ . , Comments• . 11 L~ - (Woiric Ccmpteted Apparently per Specffications,.Probiems and their Sofutions) • , . , ~ ; s - i `,f--: ~r,-~ ~`H ,~~.a-,r~ s ~ i~~~ ~i"~.c/ ~ . ~ a S t> I'O -c,e_ I'r`~A e, ~ s 7d ~ - i Non-Conforming Items: (Projector Standard Specification ' _ . Observed Constnaction is in Non-Compliance with) . . IPE Fiald Rep 1PE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep = INLAND . PACIFtC NUCLEAR GAUGE TEST RESULTS In ENGINEERING J o b N a m e IPE Job No, W.O. # ~ Field Report No. Date /CVr'C / ~ Tech. - ~ „ . os= 3Fs~~l MS= /75 YO Test Ft Below Wet Moisture Dry Max Percent Pass Retest No. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density Oensity Compaction or of (PCF) (PCF) Fail DT No. r/O) 3a. 73 ~p 410 14~- T- ~ o . 13 X. Li /30. 6 137-7 . ~ c•lrwclear.pm! . . im _ C INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: Mav 2. 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 PRQJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th ATTENTION: Ed Parry . Description M ~ Xerox Prints Copy of Letter M~ I ~ Original Drawing Contract Documents M~ Work Authorization M x~ Report IVo. Copies Description ' . Dailv Inspection Revorts #67 throueh. #80 coverinQ ~ the veriod 3-19-97 throueh 4-7-97. PUIpOSe M XI Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks d~ C\ . ~ - Signed: CC: u~ B~rch„ Pacif ic Pioverties . D:\TRNSMT PMS ^I ~ INLAND l~ . PACiFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ~ . ENGINEERING. ~pew 7- Date Inspector's Oaity. Report Na.: o, . . ~ 7 . I ime ~ . IPE Project No.: Arriva ea t er - rage ivo. oY ~ Ciient ~ - Local Representative/ p one number ~,4,~lP. e-Li r $ - Ce General Contractor i a epr'esen v on number ~r~ . ~c~ t Mana eN hone u~ es Subcontractor IPE roj~c~ ~~l ,/'li1 CP ~ IPE Fietd Representative ~0 A44 IW e~'?/yl~ Manpower & Equipment Used Comments: /w 1 1 j (Woric Gompleted Apparently 14 ~ l'~ `3 P r ~ 'Ps S perSpecifications Problems . -lelrSolutions) ~~-30 - 96 c~N ' le ~ 0.&. G rlPl,~ fiT vti t.'.•l c7 {dJ n ~ v d tzj,cJ P. I-A Z;~) 14 c-;~c ~ r C~ T S ~4, ~ 1,, T P ✓ 'e.. 0 /P. ~ - • ~r-~ f P ~ ~L~ 1 ~-e fDf- ' j ` T: -S Vi- ~ Si d ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTAT{VE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor IPE project manager. Oate _ • Oate ~E CQNSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: .7 INLANo PACIFIC . DAILY FIELD REPORT CUZ ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: , ' ~ 7 IPE ProJect No. ~ . Page No. ~ ot ~ ~d . ~ . Comments: ~ ~ P ~f ~r Ae!W - &.74- (Work Completed ApparentJy perSpecifications,Problems S ~ r~~ andthelrSoluUons) ~ /~'..~~t✓ ~,.5' G~ ~ fi • ~ ' . r- . . . _ . . . ~ ~ . ~ • . . r . ~ Non-Conforming items: . (Projector Standarcl Specificatlon • , Observed Construction is in ~ Non-Compliance with) - ~ . - IPE FiQId Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist ~ Decemher 30 1996 / 19 Mar 97 ~6, 67 , 3~C9~q' 14 a ~ 3oC-~ - The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. This list should be used as a guideline, it may not include all aspects.of the construction as many items are not identifiable due to the weather and status of construction at this stage. Many of the items listed below can not be completed until the utility trench is backfilled or weather is more conducive. Items remaining to be completed: Schedule I: Street Grading , . . r ~ . 1, 1 2. Fine grade curbs, including compaction.,and backfill.of curbs and edge of asphalt. 4. Fine grade sidewalks and wheelchair ramps including compactiori and backfill. 8. Install Type III barricades as specified. 9. Install centerline monuments. (IPE) ' . , Schedule III: Storm Drainage 2. Filtration swales jo B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' Ponds A) All `208' ponds need to be rough graded to a11ow for 4" of topsoil prior to seeding or ° sod placement. Pond H requires expansion once adjacent basment is backfilled. B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. D) 4' wide concrete apron from curb inlet to pond bottom needs to be completed at Pond . «R-I-„ E) All `208' 'ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan. . 4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; . C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. More specific cases are listed below: C.iii) Drywell in Pond "M" needs filter fabric under the grate. C.iv) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y3" requires cleaning. C.v) The inlet and drywell combination in pond "Y2" requires the same items mentioned above. C.vi)1'he inlet and drywell combination in Pond "Y1" requires the same items mentioned above. C.viii) The drywell in Pond "C" requires filter fabric under the grate. 5. Spokane County Standard Curb Inlet Type 2: A) One section of sidewalk adjacent to Pond "P" needs to be removed and a Type 2 curb inlet needs to be installed. 6. Concrete inlet TYPe 1 . C) Inlets must be cleaned and protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. (Typical to all inlets) Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured. B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill and compaction operations. C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and.backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; . A) All Spokane County Type 1 curb inlets need the apron poured: B) Curb needs to be protected from damage during backfill. - C) Broken or rej ected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: ~ A) All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. . . B) Install all wheelchair ramps per Spokane County Standard Detail A-4. ..Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement > 2. Interior Roads; - A) Minimum density and depth requirements not met on some of the interior streets: ~ The penalty and resolution to this item may be negotiated between the contractor and sponsor. (See Petroleum Science Inc. report dated December 18, 1996. Copy attached) B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. . Schedule VII: Utility Trenching . 1. Utility trench and utility boxes require backfilling after boxes have been placed. A) Coordinate with W.W.P. for final utility box and transformer placement. - B) Coordinate with W.W.P. for street light placement. C) Coordinate with Cox Cable for pedestal installation. D) Coordinate with U.S. West for pedestal installation. Miscellaneous Items: . B) Approval from Consolidated Irrigation District for final approval. C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. INLAND PACIFIC ` DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING 7y"' Date Inspectors Oaily Repo'rt No.: W01pe ~ 7,172,.(,,4d . ~K' , . ~ . Arrival Time IPE Project No.: C-10 ~w ea er . ~,age No. of . Client , Local Representative/ p one number ,%-C~'t I i . • General Contractor e,e;_ 'sen ve one mber 14 ~ - 'S Z~~-/ . Subcontractor IP Proje Manager/ phone nu er Z-~P IPE Field Representative / r~ ~G'/ r~• C'y~,J~t~ - , Man ower & Equipment Used ~ - . r - , • , , Comments: (work Completed Apparently ;pecifcations Problems . cheirSolutions) Ov1 ~Gtnr~~'~ f % ,~A~r,a. ~~Gar~;~;J'~~~t..+'`~~Y ~~~.,~'v,/'.~'4" l ~ /P C.'•9 .r~ t ~ ~ _ . ~ Lt G;r~r a j / l' ' - . /i'rp,4 6e-e- P _ rGs 4elky-c7ec.i r ~ . . ~~ck/ / H-~[r_e~ `erf ; ~ / ~f h s r r~,/'' L [ ~ 0' i7 / ( 'y~~ ~ ~ ~ ' . / " • • . s- .O. z, 6 d u .s y6" u1 e Go 9 . IPE FIELD REPRESE IVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE *00 This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer d/or IPE project manager. . , 1 • Oate Date _ IP CO~STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: . • _ _1.^'r'.. .~.~._r_..r._." " ' - INLANO ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT I^I ENGI,NEERING Date D ~ Inspector's Daily Report No.: v~ 9 7 ~h ~,c ✓sr.~'~ _ IPE Project No. ~ page No. ot ~ - /`S Comments: d V (Woric Completed ApparenUy • " / per Specfficatlons Problems -a S and their SoluUons) . Aoom ~ ~ tae.4-1 s. ~ . 1 , i . t. . . . I Non-Conforming Items: (Project or Standard Specification Observed Constructlon is in Non-Compliance with) r &7 ~ IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep 1 i-■ "IN I N LAN D PACIFIC NUCLEAR GAUGE TEST RESULTS ~ UT ENGINEERING PMCV a.~ Job Name 1-, IPE Job No. ~1~07o-l W.O. # Field Report No.. c~ - _ . . . - Date X-,!!n Ai~. 9 7-=- Tech. n-t /3'I- os= nns= ~ ~ y~ ~ Test Ft Below Wet Moisture Dry Max Percent Pass Retest No. . Location 8G. Elev Oensity (Percent) Density Density Compaction or of ' ` - (PCF) (PCF) Fail DT No. a! 1~ S ~~..ez /af7s' CT' . , 3 G F . . b. wo,~~ /y~as ~s;~vai1< : 7 75 ~ ~a~. ~ ~3y,s 9a p ~ Ahby 1000 t . ' y ~ . ~ ~ c:InuGear.pm5 ~ ~ . . . • . ~ 4 ~ TRACT "A» . u u . - - \ b-p - .~--~r t,v o ~ F r ~I , 5 ~ ~ ~ ~~►~n 5 ~ . . . ~ 2 / / / ``~`~~tir~ti~ 1~- ~ . . ~ 3 r- / i~ , ~ \ ` ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ (21)~~ ~ 21 ~ \ -J ~ ~ ` . 20 . ~ ~ _ •1 ~ . 10 ~ \ ~ ` . . - _ r . 19 9Ga ~ r~ 18 12 . , ~ . ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6~ ► , ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 17 2 1.4 15 , .13 w • , , ~ 4 . 611 , 1 ~ ~ tt_ ~ i . , - 17 )10 ~ - 18 ~ ► L~~.-r~----'ti ' ~ `1 ' I ~ 4 f , f~ 4 / ~1 _rl' ' ~ , ► . ~ ~ 16 j r - . . - r j _ . ~ _ ~ ~ . _ . . _ . _ _ . ~ . 20 3 12 I L I 2 1~~- I 2 13 22 1~. W ~ ~ ~ - W. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.r-~~~rv~ ~ . , TRACT "C' ~ TRACT » B" - l j~"''~~•~' - L ~ INLAND PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT r~- ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: ~ Arrival Time IPE Project No.: - Y11,60) , ~Op& -o Weather e~;U4 ~ page ~o. of a ~7~~, ~ ~ Local Representative/ ph ne number - Client Genera 6ontractor i e esen ve p one umber Subcontractor iPE Project Manager/ pho e nu ber aneLlt IPE Field Representative :~Qt-14 Man ower & Equipment Used ddL11 nr ~~C( t d //Lc.~ 7'L'- ( ,c1'2-~~ t'Q) f4 S + - Comments: (Worfc Completed Apparentiy 0.4,C-6 0 , - ecifications Problems • ~ eir Solutions) ` QY- S tA m o° . ~ c,c1ck. p o . ~ r ~'~i'{/'~ ` + D ~ ~ ~VyC~ ? Q'~'~• r J ,l -.f j„,, 1 ~~~~•~~s"~!~~! IPE FIELD REPRESEN TIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engine/an ~ r IPE project manager. Date Date IP CO TN ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER . Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: - ~ . ~ ~ . ` i --T-----T---i- 8 ~ ( ~ s i s i ~ i ~ o i ~ 2~ 3 ~ 4 ~ i i i v~~ ~ 2 ~ ~ \ ~ t ~ L + , i~~ ~ ~ ' ' . - /7 ~ ~ - . j~' ~ ~ ~~~qb;` . 4 5 B ~ 7~ 8- ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ~~i~'i~/ \ ` 1 3 . r'1 ~~i . ` 2 ~ ~ ; 9 . . 2 K ~ ; = . - ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ , • , . ~ ~ ~ 13 ~ ~2 ~1 i ~ ~ ~ , , - i i~/ ' ;Z~'~ ` O ~ ~ , 2 i ~ ~i ' • ~ ' ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ` ,f 1,~4j,.. .i ~ ~ , ti ~3 R , - • ~i~ r . - sa ~ ,4 } ~ ~ . 5 , ' ' w • \ ~ ~ . t TFiAICT ~Aw . ~ ' t`' , . , 5 .1 oa~ , ~ ' ,J • r a~. , ~ . 4VFjR~'ALK 7TH ADDITION ~t ~'?0 ~ " 6 ~ ~ 3 ~r ~ , / r-~-- ~ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~ ~ i e 1~ l~ e~ ~ ~o ,oo zoo ~ 7 ~ 3~ 4 5 ~7 ~i' g~ ol i ✓h ►4~Q' G 7 ~a e~ : C~ 1 ' 8 ~ ,.,o► ~ ( N ~ FE~T ) ( ~ ) , / _ 1 lnch , ~ 100 R `J , ~ • 9 ' G _ ~ - h s ~ ~ ~-e 20 - . ~ Qe .10 ~ ' ~ LoCh r~a ~t l~/i~iG~l 19 18 ~ 12 ~ 9 0 . s , ~ os _ ~:n ~7 t~ .~`~J 12 2 ~ ~ g 15 14 c~ . ~ , 4 ~ 7 ' 7 ~ r~ 11 20 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ 9 ~ s- ~ ; g 8 8 10 19 ~ 5 5 ~ 1,~ - ~ t 5 0 , 18 19 r 18 4 4 ~ 7 6 ~,p 11 ~g ~ ~ g _ 3 . r 4 20 3 ~ _ 12 1 S 5 21 i 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 16 7 , 2 - O . o . _ ~ ~ 4 ~ 2 3 15 1 14 22 i 1 `'J ~ , ~ i ~ - . ~c:~__.._.._.._...~._.~»_»_..~.~ . - ___~__.-_r_w~-_______ - _ 7 INLAND PACIFIC ~ I NUCLEAR GAUGETEST RESULTS EN'GINEERING 3o~#~y v Job Name ~o eQ,f)A Iv -7~ - IPEJob No. W.O.# Field Report No. Date o211~,/~,~9 ~ Tech. os= Ms= / 7514 L ~~l Test ' Ft Below Wet Moisture Dry Max Percent Pass Retest No. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density Density Compaction or of (PCF) (PCF) . Fail DT No. _ 7 -6 rh`aC L~,4-- , ~ ~ . s, 44k yo, y 9, I d ~ 715 ? S 9 l/~~S ~ l ~ ~ a ~s a L ~ ~;~~eG~ /~/y. ~ 6- 7 l3.SS /~q S ~ ~ ~ . ~ pa ro l ` L7-- 5` ~ r~ l~~I ~ 5 - l 31 • S. 13~. S 9 ; ~ . ~ . po~~ a-c, L-~aKc St6w4l< ~ . q,5 P ;2- f /ll~y 7~~ - ' r . ~ 130 o r 3 s ~3 l j K 13~, 0. ~ /=:7 . L't )o ~9,s 7, . ~ ~ . .~WRW~ ,40P` o;2. 13 f 1. s 17 P oJ5 ~o~ L.T- s~ sd9 We vr 2N t r Ga~rt,C - " . I ~ f,!0 7-' s~~~•+ ,~,~erL~kc. ~ Z- r-- 3 S•~`i"lar il, v' G~a S;~Qe,wa~~lc ~ L ~ ~ l ~ /~k ?SZT sU 13~3- 7 13~~s /I/je/YI /c(avt I, a Nc- ~ t ,Cr s;d 7 C,05 1~3a.7 137,s 5~' o o . //0 1. Gal.~t- ~ CA - ~ ~~~so ~ 7- <t~f~ ~ Cllq jj6, a s q . ~ i ~~~i~~Gy► Z-a ~ . /.3FO6 L. i s : /0 /I?, l(Cj v► /-q4Ak_ sG ~ ~c~~l 6.5y/ t so L ~ jr~ L( • c:lnuclear.prts - .7 INLAND PACIFIC NUCLEAR GAUGETEST RESULTS 1 ENGINEERING Job Name A~1 I eYo'l ,va IPE Job No. *a"() 2C,9-1 W.O. # _ Field Report No. ~g Date o?1M 41Z g 7 Tech. J~'/Aj ~ DS=,7 9 7oZ ~ MS= I ~,f 1 ~o Test Ft Below Wet Moisture Dry Max Percent Pass Retest No. LocaGon SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density Density Compaction or of - (PCF) (PCF) Fail DT No. .Sr~~K q ~ ~a~ ~ L T ~ I . . . ~ c:lnuGear.pm5 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Oate Inspector's Daily Report No.: ~ 7v* . Arrival Time ~ IPE Project No.: o ?a ileaUher ~ i-age No. or Client , ^ Local Representabvg/ phone, number . L~ C ~ AroAe /'~I 1 ~ cG~ ~ ~ ; enera ontrac r e sentativel phone umaer G P v e7'?rA Subcontractor IPE ProVtZ tMana erl phone n ber ,44 v s~~'S!t1 ~ IPE Field Representative . ~-Q k, Man ower & Equipment Used IJGl-ea..~ /G►~~,~ ~ . . . , - Comments: j / (Worfc Completed Apparently r,2)P per Specffications Problems r MeirSolutlcns) %,%I g f~ v ~ a.. le-r-14 'r, /~Z(,) /I a.v lan Oa- ~P 717, ' 5~f9 /0 YsO ~ S!/6 ~c ~ ~ . ^ ~ 1~-~-- ro ,rvr s Q ,r -e 44 P Aa ~ c r--C ~ r Li ~d 7 koL-t- 114 4.41 ~ ~a S 1C,*1- f" el r~ . ~ r~ G~"L' -y~~ ~ d•r`~rtc,~ 1 e / . ~ J . 1~ /~t - - Agog- ign - /t/ i W _ XREPRES~ENTE IPE FIELCONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer an r IPE project manager. W Date O ate I CO ON ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER r Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ` ~ 7 INLAND PACIFIC OAILY FIELD REPORT i ENGINEERING Date - Inspector's Daity Report No.• ~ LI ma r q7 ~0. . IPE Project No. v ' Oage No. ot ~ Comments: 6- ~ ~ - (Wortc Completed Apparently perSpec~aations Problems p i S!.. ~ ' and their Solutions) ~ 'or 4 ~JL' ~-c . - ~ o • n i e P e c on . . e n o p n . 0 ' Ael IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep INLAND r PACIFIC OAILY FIELD REPORT `ENGINEERING Date . Inspectors Daily Report No.: . "'c";;. Arrival Time IPE Project No.:~~Y~~ . 7:30 ~ . . ea er 6-0 ~ i-age No. / oY / , . Client Local Representat1ve/ phone number . General Contract,or ~ i e en ~v _ p one nugber . / ~ Subcontractor IPE Proj t Mana erl phone um r n,1~ IPE Field Representative I Manpower & Equipment Used ~ ~ ~ ~ tf G~u ~ c~ - _(,cJ r EL renn ~A-se 59000 /o ~ , _ . ~ 1~ - . ~ Tf • , Comments: . •-L ! • / L ~ c~f' ~ ~i~2J-C._ ~ G~-- • (Worc Completed ApparenUy s-I ecificaUons Problems teir Solutlons) A ~.t • . . , ~ a~r.l,itn_ ~ ~-td.L~1~ _5 r J p? G I~ i f S?'a hvvA /d fso fa s a Qtr6 kk-l3 f.~~(,~ a, se- e- oa~,e- 3 ,r1 o '-W-eAA) o k a ~ ,r, ~t ~ , UQ4~ ao a ~ ~ ~ , 1/70" ~p , ~ - l,e.. _ , ~ ~ ~ . IPE FIELD REP ESEN~TE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construct~ engineer a/ r IPE project manager. Oate Date . IP COI~T CTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT MANAGER U Corresponding Deficiency Report No: W' a 7 INLAND PACiFIC.- DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Oaily Report No.: ~ 9 7 ,ee~ IPE Project No. N070 / Page No. oi ~ Comments: faa/ a Cr &/22~ 3 s .b &P * ~P tA, (Work Completed ApparenUy ~ per SpeclficaUons Problems CLje`r? n n p_ ass~ nd their Sotutions) • ' 6 ,L,P /o-u') cle ' c &A ~~f ~ L°/ *440 , j t 'Oo/ o~; P_ Gt _ &c-w tn - lr--~a - ~-,j!ne . . 1/~ ~ P__ S'e , . ~ . . . Non-Conforming Items: ' (Project or Standard Specification • _ Observed ConsUvctlon is fn Ncn-Compliance wtth) IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep . ; . ~ ~ - I I I I 8 I I ~ 3 4 i 5 i 6 ~ 7 ~ iO~ ~2 \ool . ~00, ~ . , i i'\ , ~~•'x 1 • 4 5 6 k 3 ~ ~ ~ i ~2 9 ~ ~ •2 13 12 11 •O / 14 2 3 , ' ~ . . d ` ~ . ' 4., TRAM ~Ar - 5- , - • 1 . ~ . ~ iVEttWALK 7TH ADDITION 6 2 ,3 . ~ GRAPHIC SCALE r~7/ 1. 50 100 200 3 7 4 ` 5 7 p~ cr ~ 6 N ~ ~ . 8 1 inch R ~ . g - 20 1 .1o 1.1 _ • ~ 19 12 i ~ 9 18 = 1 17 12 , 6 17 4 ~ i 14 2 16 15 . . ~ f 7 14 7 20 8 v LAW ( . tMO. 8 g 10 19 5 l oco-t 0 ~ 17 18 18 19 . . 7 6 - ~ 4 ~4.C 11 16 ~ I . 5 17 ~ 3 - n 12 ~ 1g O i 2 15 O21 i . 2. 4 • 7 2 3 15 1~ 14 22 - . 1. lrRAa ~ . ~ ~c:~~_..~.~.~.~....~.~__..~' - ~ X ~ - ~ . n.o~a=._. _ - - - - - a • i . . f i ~ INLAND - - - PACIFIC NUCLEAR GAUGETEST RESULTS `r• ENGINEERING _ . Job Name AxAe--,A.,tdV IPE Job No. W.O. X Fjeld Report No. . _ . . _ . . _ . . ~ ~ l - - Date -2517W 7 7 Tech., os= 3 r4G0 MS= 17W`f - Test Ft Below Wet Moisture Dry Max Percent Pass Retest No. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Oensity Density Compaction or of (PCF) (PCF) . Fail OT No. ,~l/'e ~y L 9, ~ ~ %9~r-s Uh 1~416 - - -16,,-e-75 L7- 135,7 7(a IX, D 7 . _ . . _ _ , . , - , _ . - ~ - ~ . ~ . ~ . . , - c:lnuclear.pm5 _ . - / • 'M INLAND - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING . ; Date 6 Inspees Daily* Report No.: ~ - . . Arrivai Time IPE Project No.: - 9~a o ~ ~ . ea er page 0 Ro. . o~aCc r ~ ~ a-C4 Client Loca RepresentaUve! phone~ ~ umber ^G Genera-Contractor site ep en v p o e numb r Subcontractor . IPE Projec ana er/ phone nu ber . IPE Field Representative 3-0 .c/~ . . . Nv/\ Man ower & Eq ipment Used - 14e*-F/.~-~ - Comments: (Work Completed ApparenUy -04P 01 ~ perSpecfficaUons Problems a eir Solutions) P/~L_ S Q.~~ is e AZ A. L~. . 'a:4 /do .4-- . ~ , ~ . . .e ~o , ~ . o s,do- Ur` Pd' cff o< ~y~s'~ / f-.,.Q /Jrr ~ ~S ~~cX~..uIY~,~~~~ ti ✓`~c~ ~cx a~ ~A 3 ~ / L/ 74f-h, z- A . e-- o-•~.~ ~t,s~ - - ~ / .7 O , IPE FIELD REPRESEN;E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction enginee and/or IPE project manager. • Oat e Oate 2PE2NEE TRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER r Corresponding Deficiency Report No: - 7 INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date ~ Inspector's Daily Report No.: Z r . (9 ~ IPE Project No. wage No. ~ ot l ~ g Comments: (Work Completed Apparently . ~ ) • , . per Speclficattons Problems and their Soluttons) r ~o -~L,~ c~ .i~► ~-~.~s ~ d ~ ~/m;c~..~~ . . v ~ ~C 7`' Z:y t. . Non-Conforming Items: (ProjectorStandatd Specification . Observed ConsUvctlon is in • Non-Compl[ance with) IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ • ~--T_""~.__--T---T----t----r--- ~~~'~~~'C~~~ I I I I 8 lOl 6~7~2~1 ~2 2~ \ . .:oe'~; 5 8 ~ 7- 8- • 2 - 9 r 2 4«XA*4 i .0,~ ~ i ~ • ' ~ ~ ~ . i .01 13 1 12 11 2 ~ @10 . , ~ • oe • \:J3 . ~ . / c,~c.w~e~,{t~ 4 ( TWICf •A• 3 7TH ADDI''ION :2 . . . ~ GRAPHiC SCALE 3 100 ao 1 zoo 7 ~ 4 5 7 g ~ 0 17 IN FM) t' hch ~ 100 R 20 . .10 1.1 - . . 19 12 18 ~ 9 0 , . 1, , ~ 17 4 14 12 2 6 ~ 16 15 I ~ j 7 ~ 20 g ~ 9 ~ ; -~~►~5~0 8 9 10 19 ~ 5 O ! 0 17 1 5 1 18 F - 18 4 . ~ s ~ 4 ~ i 16 19 4 , 5 ' 3 1r ~ 20 3 12 15 C5) 21 ~ i 2 . 16o 7 , 2 . ~ 4 ~ O 2 3 15 , , ~ .C. , 4 22 ~ ~ C..~.. i►~•~ ..~»~..~5..• ■ 71NLAN ~ PACI IC ~ NUCLEAR GAUCETEST RESULTS ■ ENGINEERING t-I ~ . . . - , . - Job Name 21\de ,t )a I-k) IPE Job No. W.O. # Field Report No. ._Date 9 ~ - Tech. . Ds_ - 7 8~6 ~ ~MS: g`I Test Ft Below Wet Moisture Dry~ Max Percent - Pass Retest No. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density- Oensity Compaction or . of (PCF) (PCF) Fail DT No. /I (/'e / 7 • . ~ ~ ~ s~ f S, ~ /U ~ ~ • - ~ J~,~ ~ ~ ~ 07 03-~, ~ br ~ . ~ ~ ~ . 5 ~ 7 0,~,- AuC ~ - ~ 1c)7cL, 15 p 3 y v a y . ,X - ~ - , •M ' ~ . ~ • ~ • C:V1UC102f.pPi15 ` ' - 7 INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING RRI~p rtA J 61 ~ML T~ Date Inspector's Daify Report No.: ~ . ~ CP7 Arrival Time ~ IPE Project No.: - / 4070 Weatner A ~age ~vo. / or 11*-0/ Client . . Lo al Representative/ phone number General Contrac r i e e sen af~`ive p one num er .~-n- Subcontractor IPE Proje Manage 1 phone umber / ' / - ~~,o ' As IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used Comments: (Wor1c Completed ApparenUy ~i~-~ ' Q' /'s ✓T S" /Zo ('9- E~ SP. ✓Z~ ~G~ •~Q per Specifications Problems ~ eir Solutions) T P /I?oid' IPE FIELD REPRESENTATI E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constructio engineer an or IPE project manager. Date - ' Date . ~ E- • et CO~tTR CTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT 11AANAGER ~ Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: p REpp~tT pp►11.~ F~E~" e o ~Np r's ~aity R P tt ■ ~N ~G Insl?p-et'0 . N~~~EERIN~ - a9e E - - ' _ • , _ _ GI prolect No. otnments~ a're"tty Vork ComPlstons pr'°blems 47-4 01 e+r SP~~ ,,d U'eir solutlcnsl _ ~ ~ ~,j/-► . _ ~ !o - • I ! ~ ~ J . ~ t~~~ , A ~ f . , ~ r ' ~ . , ~ e P • , ~ ~ . . ' ~ _ ~ ~ - - L ~ - ~ • , -r-~' ~J r ~ . --i"" °n . rs `n ~ f ~ ~ - _ 1 ° • ' ~ `r' L- / _ , - • ~ . j ~ Q~ / ' • ~ Go tmctor• s ReP i IPE PM . ~ ~ t` ' ► IPE CE . woo IPE V:eild Rep q 9 ~ I • I ~ 1o1 O,, i 2 ~ 2 1 1 ~ I i I I I L ~ %~~~X ~s~ ~ • 4 5 8 - 7 8. r -i . . ~ 2 ,41„~ 9 ~ . . . . ' J~ - - • ~ 12 11 2 ~ 2 O 10 ~ \ . L5e wE'_ C rlJ'i ~eS -e x?`e-, ri A ec.f f zkQc~ 67`y P _ ~ . TRIbCf •A• ~ 5 . a , ~Vzm(ALK 7fiH ADDIfiION ~ 6 $ , 2 3 1~ Z,P,Q y~pa~~4~,~ ~oo GRAPHI~Co S~ ~ 3 4 \ 5 7 IQ-~ ~ . ~ s 97 ~7 N FET 8 1 bcfi ~ 100 R ~ S 20 ~c-' ~ct 9 .10 ~ ~ r . . ~ L- • 9 ~ ~P~~~ . 1 18 O 12 13O 6 ~ ~ 17 ~4 8 12 ~ 16 i v 14 2 ~ 15 . ~ , 14 7 20 8 ~ ~ ~ Lmo. 6 = 9 --r . 8 9 10 19 ~ 5 O ~ 0 17 5 6 . 18 1 4 ~ 16 18 19 r 4 C 7 11 i 5 17 3- ~ 20 ' 3 owrov w ^ 12 ~ 16O , 2 15 O 21 i 2 ~ 5 ~ T . O 2 3 4 1 14 22 1 • . ~ ~ c:.=»=:.=.:_._.:=..=•-- _»_.._::~:~~•-~-»_.~.~._~::~j "M INLAND PACIFIC NUCLEAR GAUGE TEST RESULTS ENGINEERING L ~ Job Name 21 ~ t.A.Jo~.l e ~ IPE Job No. W.O. # Field ReoortNo. Date ~ 7i41? 7 7 Tech. :J~ os= 3 qs~ nns= Test Ft. Below Wet Moisture Dry Max Percent Pass Retest ~ No.. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density Density Compaction or of (PCF) (PCF) Fail DT No. ✓yl,`ss~~ov~ a - 3:2, ;2cl4-,10 F6 F l-•~/1 7 rS S /`e- ~ ~ 3 L ► lU1►'s s ~o v~ d~ - 5,0 ~1~•~J~,a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . -7 ov. - ~ ~ 3 5 ~..~►re_. . . ~ ~ . 8 -Vso t---~ 135, C r o~: ~J'( Y . . ~ , ' P • ~ ~ ~ - ~ . . • . cAnuGear.pm5 7 INLAND PACIFIC - DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING ~r - Date inspector's Oaily Report No.: ~ 2- 41 ~ 7Y Arrival Time /'c~ IPE Project No.: Weatner - ~ ~ page No. / o 4V CfLa~ ~ Client J Local Representativel phone number P Cc _ Ql~'rY,~ ..t,4 Vv~ephone ~General Contractor i ep~sen v~Gu ber Subcontractor ' IPE Proje Mana er/ pho e n mber l,v 4~.Q~-- II,.~ IPE Field Repres'entative . e /0 ..C) tLAA -Manpower & Equipment Used ~ . „ . Comments: (Woric Completed Apparently / P TyA o per Specifications Problems ~ ' *heir Solutions) ~ u ~ . . , 71r,TlI' Q " / . . _ ~ D,r~r. :S G!.•v2.,F~' ~..-P~ J' P ~n f~~~ Cc-: G Lc5 (2 ( " ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENT IVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer dlor IPE project manager. _ ~ . Date - Date /fE C STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: e B,. g _ . i ~ ~ 3 I 1 1 I( z~ 1 ~ 12 . le.oopX` \s~ ~ - 4 5 8 ~ 77 8. z . 3 i 2 ~ 2 ..e / / ol/ ' ~ - 1... i i / 13 12 11 ~ - ~ 2 ~ O10 14 O ~ oe . ~ ~ 3 . lo - ~ s . 4 . \ . TRIICT 09 I . 5 , . , NJjK 7TH ADDITION *-7o / i 6 2' 3 ~ - GRAPHIC SCALE 3 4 5 G~ 7 100 ~o 1 zoo 7 g 7 ~ , ` a Rtvt N nMr 8 1 ktch ~ 100 R • . . 20 s - .1o ~ 19 12 1 9 _ ,s o ~ ,7 oe ~ 14 12 2 16 15. 14 7 7 8 ~ 20 ~ 9 8 9 10 19 5 I 5 5 0 17 18 ~ 18 19 4 C ~ 6 ~ 4 11 ! 16 i 5 17 ~ 3 1. / 20 3 12 Q 16~ ~ 2 15 ~21 i 2 r ~ 4 O7 2 3 15 T~~ •C•.~.~14 22 ~ 1 , ~ «~7 ~~:~:L ~~.~•~'_Z.',~..•.swst:_,a..~.=r:a ~LSe.s~t~ly/~ ~ r r~ ~ ~ ~ - - ww - - - - .«w - - - - w - - - wwr - aI - r w - ww w r - - - - ww - w - - - - - Yw - - wM w - w r rr ' ,L 0 Q A /~Y! 0 INLAND PACIFIC - DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.:X5- Arrival Time IPE Project No.: ~ 7'~3o ~ 46 Weatiner ~ page ~30. of . CHent Local Representat~ve/ phone number _q A ZieneraiZontractor ~ i e p n ve p one num r Subcontractor IPE Projec ana er! phone num er IPE Field Reofesentative 14A A ~~y~~..~~. . . . Manpower & Equipment Used ~ r7S [.a ~.~~ti~t,.,~t?`. • } , .,tA )d r7 Comments: (Wor{c Compieted Apparently eQ~---- &--e- ecfficatfons Problems , Ir Solutions) n--•t~.~`.~~` 1~,~ ( ~~.c_.rY~s~, /~.C~.~ A.L&4=~ _ 1 ~ C• S 1-4"), a. s ~ ~ ~ ~J,!''~'. e ~~,~~Y~i l,t~gS' ~ ~ ,1' i~~ 1~t T l~ Q-,,~' ~ 1%"e-eit7A_. a % ~ - . IPE FIELD REPRESENT IVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. Date Date . . . . ff~~EE C S RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT (VIANAGER 0 . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ' A 71NLAND ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING ~C . A/ Oate - LN Inspector's Daily Report No.: , IPE Project No. ~ Page No. ~ ot • 1 Comments: (Woric Completed Apparently per SpeciflcaUons Problems Gt, 11144 20r"A. ;;2 Acvj and tlheir Solutions) . ~ D ~ . ~ T,~ j'e.r Ar IC_ ~ - ~ lec..4 zru L,,, ~ ~':.C~ , . . , . . . . . n • IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep . - ~~~-r--r-----T----~----{----r- ~ I I I I$ I I 5 i 6 i 7 .~i-~ ~ 3 I 1 1 lO 1 1 I 2 ii'\ ~~~~~~~~X ~ • 4 5 8 • 7- 8 i 2 A ~ i ~ / 2 9 i~ _ . . ' ~ / • _ ~ . ' ~ / / . 13 12 11 n 10 .:~~~2 • , . 1,4 O . ~ v O3 . i . ~ . , . ` , 4 ` . ~ . . TRIiuCT •A• - 5 VERWALK 7TH ADDITION 2 3 • 1 . $ . S GRAPHIC SCALF p14'~ 100 ao 1 zoo 7 ° 3 ' 4 5 7 75 ~ IN FM., , 8 - JOCS&AM ~ ~ , trc, - ,oo ft. ~ . 20 . • .10 11 ~ ~ 19 •12 ~ 9 . 18 O 2t 13Q s 17 ~4 8 12 ~ 16 i v 14 2 ~ 15 • ~ f 14 ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ 20 ~ 8 6 u.o. ~ 9 • « 6 8 9 10 19 ~ 5 O ~ 17 5 18 18 4 19 jo 4 C~ 11 !16 i ~ 5 17 3 ~ 20 3 12 15 21 ~ 16 7O i 2 ~5 ~ 2 O7 2 3 15 1 T~~ 14 22 1 3 c: ~ _ s~~-'~aC7Z %~o-yt Fe~'-----___=-~r_~-.~.:~. . de ~ ►'t-Y 1--~s -».1~ /-n,a,} _ ► 1 , . i_•.. n ,-0--7 INLAND ~ PACIFIC NUCLEAR--GAUGETEST RESULTS 111F ENGINEERING . ' o~_ Job Name 1~ .1k IPE J o b No. AzaaV W.O. # . _ Field Report No. 75._._. Date Tech. O~~AV DS= ~j 8 ~I 1 C~ nns= l-?"l 1y = . . Test Ft 6elow Wet Moisture Ory Max Percent Pass Retest No. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density Density Compaction or of - (PCF) (PCF) Fail DT No. ss/4 7/1 I)Z 3 ~ e) L F ~ ~ o o . . . _ . . , . - . , - . _ ~~~ear.pm5 INLAND PACiFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING - . 1il Date ~ Inspector's Daily Report No.: lyw Arrival Ti e IPE Project No.: 76 ea er irage No. / oi ~ c~ Client ` Local Representative/ p one number General Contractor . 4MLOZp en La ve p one n ber ~ . 5►lG ~s7~ - E Pro ec Mana er/ hone m er Subcontractor IP j g p i n~l~~r IPE Field Representat~ve Man wer & Equipment Used - ~O rd~t~t ~f/' L~~i~►'~'~ . ~ I`vl K..I.,U/ o•/'G ~'l~t.~v..~ J C! /~P~ ~'1'°~,r^ r !/~',ra ,~C/l~ -S~ ~C~~~ - Comments: (Wor~ Completed ApparenUy --f , ~ - /'o d- ~ ~ perSpeciflcations Problems ar Neir Solutions) LT ~}y~ //LJ.~ ~ ~ ~ /~l le'l, `7 B7 Q //1 / ee~ /V It/ V_ ~ ~ / / / 1 Q' « + VI~! " Y " I ~ . / , • &rQ u lone( . . . K,6e, =YiY ved JM R",OoC 5;4*f,~.o . ~s 70 IPE FIELO REPf2ESENT E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction enginee nd/or IPE project manager. Date Date PE NSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER r 1 . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ . ~ ~T--T---T--T -~"--T I I 1 I 8 I i ~3 4 t 5~ 6~ 7 ~ 2 1~ ~ f i I I ~ I %W ~ i ~ i ioe ~ / . . ~ X~ . 4 5 ~ * 7 8 . 3 2 ~ 9 .01 . ' 2 i ~i~/ 1 ♦ 2 • ~ / i~ ~ • ~ / oe .00 ' 13 12 11 14 2 Qio ; O3 . 4, . . - ~ . TRIVCf 'A' - 5 '?'TH ADDITION 9&1~70~ ` 6 2 3 ~ -r~ - GRAPHlC SCALE $ 7~ ,oo 50 100 2W , . 3 4 5 SP g 7 , a~,~ -~100 ' fL 8 9 zo .10 . 1s ~ 12 1 ~ s - 18 1 ~ 6 17 - , 14 ~J 12 2 ' 16 15 i 4 ~ 7- . ~a f 7 14 7 - ~ ZD 8 g 9 8 9 10 19 ~ 5 O 10 ~ 17 5 1 5 ra r.w~, l fc 18 i8 &N~'e.d }Zrc1 Cr~ 7 6 19 ~ 4 C 11 • -16 5 . t 12 17 3 20 . 3 , gO , 2 , 5 , p 21 i Z , ~ 17 2 3 4 15 13 . 14 ~ ~ TTiIVCT C'~ 22 ~ 1 ,aw.~oss~ wo . . . • - - - - - - - 71NLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING I'l T--e, v, &J-a) Date , Inspector's Oaily Report No.: 77 : 2,7 Arrival Time iPE Project No.: ~ . ~ Vveatner • ^ . ~ page R0. o9 Client Local Repretentabve/ phone number 0~ General Con ctor i e ep sen vefphone numb r A,21-(00 Subcontractor e IPE Projec ana er! phone mb , h.~C~r a~.~ c IPE Field Representative Man wer-& Equipment Used ~ . , . -ti &Z'Zoo, 1/i1 //'rJ ~2'?JQ-~✓L.(±-~ G ~,~i ~,t.s~r:.6~ y . v . ~Spc'J Comments: (Woiic Completed Apparently 4vo t.+ per Specificatlons Pr+oblems arl"leir Solutlons) ~ fa ~ ~.r',r.~f' ~ ~ 1/0, . ;:7e5l, r r r . i''T . . . 42 . ~ IPE FIEI.D REPRESENT#MVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. ' Date Date r~' xw, E C S RUCTION- ENGINEER • IPE PROJECT fNANAGER ir . . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: I ~ I I 1 1 8 1 1 ~ 3 4 t 5 i 6 ~ 7 ~ iOt 'O i ~ 12 i~•' ~ 2~ / 0- . : - 4 5 6 ~ 7 , 8 - . .elolol 3 r 2 • ' 2 00 / %'oo 2 13 12 11 ~ 14 . O , 010~ O ~ s ~?~t.t.vC~. ~ CO`tn G ~ i k- r ~Y ° ~•►-kc~c.~~ ~~~f • - . , 5 . TRACf 'A' ~ A f ~ 1 i . , ~ ~ • ~ ~ V~mfrbvv-ALK 7TH ADDITION ` •6: ~ 2 3 L 17 -3 - .fi47 GWH~C SCAE loo ~o ~oo 7 ` . 4 5 7 I kW; 1-~00 ~ tt 1~- • 8 ` ` ~ ; . 20 .10 19 12 9 • O 18. 1 7 1 6 17 ~ , V- 14 2 . 1e 15 ~ . f 14.~~. . ~ ~ 20 s a . = 6 . 9 8 9 10 19 ~ 5 O g ~ 10 . , 17 . 7 6 18 4 16 18 19 4 C 5 .+sa~woer u~ ' a 17 20 3 - - - 12 f 16O , 2 15 _ O 21 i Z 1 4 , ' O 7 2 3 15 T~~ 14 22 ~ i - - - t'° ~ 71NLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date :inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Time IPE Project No.: 7 - Vveather page No. / ot Client Local Representative/ phone number Generar Contractor i e e esentiative/ phon number /~%~'(JGII-1 ~%/'t -`S~ . Subcontractor I E'Proje t Man ger/ pho numbe~ A 6 A IA. 17-e 5 rr ! 1 IPE Field Representative ~ n ower & E ui men . . Ma q p t Used . . C'- it'/o ~,Le-~,~ s ~'a~~ ;s.~,.~,~-- Y • - L eT L:r Comments: (Worlc Completed Apparently per Speclficatlons Problems . ' ' } ieirSolutions) ~ ~ s;?~0A►~~L~, T~ * 7~s ~0 c_ U.,) 4 ~e t lil. -e . . t.C.~.~ ~i'~L- , ,d ,/G `i - G~(~'~ ~~Q ~ ~ ♦ ~ / s /3 /-r Gt. / -S G. P e, e-~ C,~ l.ti-e) . . a , T` ~ . IPE FIELD REPRESENTATI~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constru ' n engineer an Wor IPE project manager. ~ . Date Date , . ' I CON RUbTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT AAANAGER corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ . ~~~-r--~----T----1-~----~----T--- I I I I$ I i ~ I I I I I 3 1 ~ 3 4 i 5 i s i 7 2 2~ ► I I I I.O ~ ~ ~ .00,.e \ 1 p . : • 4 5 8 k 2 9 ~ ~ 2 i ~ i ~ 2 13 12 11 . 10 ol~ ~ 3 - \ o , , , , 4 . . , ~ TRIbCT 'A' ~ 5 . r~ =V=-v.►ALK 7TH ADDI'!'ION ~ ~DZa 2 . 3 7 ~r GRAPHIC SCALE .3r. .20 100 ao izoo 7 \ 4 5 7 ( H FM ) , 8 -1 inch • 100 R ~ • ~ ~ 9 ~ - 20 ~ . ~ .1o . » r . ~ - ~ 19 12 9 ,8 . o *t , . 17 17 (j)8 ~ 12 ~ 16 i _ 14 2 15 ~ .a. r . 14 7 7 20 8 ~ - g 9 8 9 10 19 ~ 5 5 ~ 17 . 18 0 18 19 4 C 6 4 - ~ . ~ 11 ! 16 ~ i 5 17 ` 3 20 3 p - - a, w 12 ~ ~ 160 ~ 2 15 ~ 21 i 2 O7 2 3 4 15 T~~ 14 22 1 ~ i / , ~ ~c:._..~.,_... - » » - - - - - - 7 INLAND ~ PACIFIC ENGINEERING DAILY FIELD REPORT Date Inspector's Oaily Report No.: Arrival Time IPE Project No.: 77 . Weatner 9'0-0 - &"o o - f . page flo. O~ ~Cr ~ ~~r ~ ~ Client . Loc I Representative/ phone nurnber Ae . ~ General Contractor ~ e e esen v phone n ber LUo~~ 447 Subcontractor ` . 107 IPE roje Mana er/ phonenuber fPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used ~ . - - / i~:/ ~?'•~e~ d~` ~ ~ar i~ra ~ P., me. % - Comments: , • ` ~,,c_ / (WorfcCompleted Apparently eW perSpecifications Problems ai ~Solutions) ' ~ ~ j~ ~.~p--~_ ~•.~.•r^`~:.l~E. - . ~I _ ~ - / ~ ) G~ a ~ ~ / l~id+~ ~ ~ ~ `i l P~ o ~ ~j~' i~ 7`4 pe aro-c4,~ h ~ ~ s~o-~ ~ a ~ C'~r ~ ~a/ % ~e. . ~~r~_ ~'~~.,t.e. p ~ ~ . C~ ~ • . Gt1 D /A.~~~ ~ f•~ 74 Xo I /ta _7 ~~G? ~ov C~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATI;;~;~ CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construc ' n engineer a!or IPE project manager. . Date Date ~ E C STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER : ~ :orresponding Deficiency Report No: . ~ P ~ ~ ~~,~T--T---~----T----~---~-~• I$ 1 I 7 i i O i 2 ~ 00%~ '.01~r~ 4 5 8 . ~ ' ~ g . . . 3 2 to ~9 / 2 j i ~ 13 12 11 ' 2 ~ O10 ' O2 , . : .0e•- 14 . - O3 , . ~ . . ~ 4. TPACT -r-\/Pe a CLtri Lat Lo c- a~f' ~ . • ~t J''~ a;~ ,.V=vWALK 7TH ADDITION s ~ 2 3 ~ #7G~ GRAPHIC SG11.E ~ 3 6 r ,oo ao 100 4 7 ~ A-e rt1 f'q3 c- F ~ ( N ~ ) ~ 8 ~ ,Mch -,00 n ~ • - . 20 . ' .100 ~ 19 18 12 9 0 7 6 17 - ~ - ~ (4)8 14 12 2 - ~ ~ 16 15 14 7 7 &L..._..~.~LUMOM. ~ 1~ ~ 20 8 6 8 9 10 19 ~ 5 5 i 17 5 0 18 19 18 4 4 C 7 6 i 11 ! 16 ~ 5 17. 3. ~ r 20 3 o _ ~EJ ~ 12 ,5 C 2, i Z 16 7~ ~ 2 ~ 4 O 2 3 15 ~ 1 T ~ 14 22 ~ ~C:.~w~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~w~H~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~w~w~~~~~~i~~~~e~M ~ ~ ` ~~~M~M~~N• -::...._..r............»_..................._.._.._.._.._.._.._..~ 1 _I - ___m___- - - - I NLAN D - r - PACIFlC DAlLlf FIELD REPORT ,CM-EIVGINEEF~ING L, - . DH#e fnspectar's Daily Report Nos• :u/ -o Y . . ~o Arrival rme iPE Project No.: V~#ea her ~ Page Ro. ~ of /JC~ Clfent _ Looa Representativel phane number . 2r- ~'~f-'~@fiBf'al '~~~1 C'rAr~ e B e5eLn r11~01'te fl bBr , C.~,~-- r _ ~..~s0~~".~'~'~ , Subcnntractor [PE Proj ct Manager/ ph~ne etu ber Zo-v IPE Field Representative~~ ~ Manpawer & Equiprrrent Used ~ - . k9 ILq-$ ~omm~nts: • (Work Complete d Appa ren Uy,116116 C'c ~"1''~`c~`~~ er,-LA-a perSpec[fications Prob?ems - ' /xr ieir SoRutlons} Ze- A", ~ . sr ~ /c. zm-,p s Pe- /C~z ~ •C~ ~ r, 46 , 7 ~ • jf r ■ . ~ IPnE 'Fn 11 Em LID R EPRES EiVT11 i CONTRACfiDR'S REPRESEIVTATIVE This document and re#erenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed arrd signed by #he IPE cons#ructiarn engineer andJor IPE praject manager. Date Date r . . , a I CO TF~IJCTION ~EfVGIIVEEi~ IPE PRO~1ECT MANACER ~ Carresponding Deficiency Repart Na: ' ik `r. . ~ ~ ~ . ~r,r-t---T---~----~-----~----~-- ~f 1 I ~ I l ( I $ ~o; ,2 . ~ . lolo7 ~ ~ . 4 5 6 ~ 7 g- y~ 3 , • 2 ' g \ a 2 - e ~ . / i~i ~ .ol .ol2 ` 13 12 11 010 . 14 ~ . ~ . . ~ . n3 . ♦ 4 - . ` • T'RI1~CT •A• 5 rype ~ r LQ•T 1.o COy' r . . C J iYER~ALK 7TH ADDITION 9~°rto-~ ~ 6 . 2 3 - ~d Pef~~ 100 cw~H~ SCALE ~oo zoo 7 ` 3 4 ~ 7 .0 6 7"~ t7 . p~ ~ ~ ~ = 8 c ~ > , t tinch - 100 ft • . 9 , a- . ~ 20 .10 ~ ~ . ~ '19 18 12 ~ - 9 O . 1 7 6 17 ~ v" 12 i 14 2 15 ~.l . ~ .W.~ • _ 7 ~ 7 - - - ~ ~ 20 8 s g 8 9 10 19 5 5 5 17 , 10 18 18 4 16 19 . 4 C 7 6- ~ l 11 ~ ~i 5 17 3 20 3 12 15 O 21 1 2 160 , 2 ~ 4 ~ .0 7 2 3 15 1 T~~•~ 14 22 ~ ~~~w~..~~•~.~~~~•.~~~~s•~~w~«~.• ~.r~... ~wiwr~ AM \C:.~..~»~i._..i:.i~i ....«..«.....~.....~~..~.~.~wr«r.~~~~~•.~~.s~..~~ ~ `Ci•~i~ w~ 1 !l+VAO~SSOI R 4. ~--...w-_~... ~~------r----- -....~r----..--~....~w..~--w-r+r--.~---wr-w.~.r~~.~r ~ ~ o s` f INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)158-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers- - 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE; Mav 23. 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 97070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ r~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~. M~ M~ Work Authorization M x~ Report No. Copies Description 1 Dailv Insvection Revorts #81 thr-oueh #82 covering - s the period 5-14-97 throuRh 5-16-97. . . . • ¢ p . PUIpOSe M XI Information Rev'iew & Comments . M.~ Per Your Request . M ~ Written Approval * M ~ Signature & Return . M~ . - . ` Remarks . ~ - - ~ Signed: ~ oue irch, Pacif ic Properties D:ITRNSMT.PMS 1 '111111111 INLAND - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING ~ ~ , ~ . . ~ . . . Date 7A Inspector's Daily Report No.: 41ML/" ~'ArrivaIPE Project No.:. - &7o Vvealher page Ro. / o Client ~ Local Repr`esentative/ phone number Genera ontrac r Site ep sen ve p one mber . ~4 . Subcontractor ~IPE Proj~Ma gerl pho e mber - IPE Field Representative .r~ . . , Man ower & Equipment Used 1/~2~ Comments: (Work Completed ApparenUy ~c.~ ~'`1~G.~~ ~ • ~C~ Sp ~'v~- ' Cn' nA "'-ecifications Probiems . ~ • eir Solutions) A ~a . - / ~~/,►~-r~ ;!<~~j~-2 ~/~'r P _ /,Cl L~- ✓Y „ ~Gi--~ir lil..~i l.~J T ~ d Q'~_ ~ / _ ♦ / ~ ~ ~'i~ ~i~' iG / ~ i G~ ~~'~'~Y LCl'GtS •J~ ~~7G/s~ / ~~~11 ''4- a ~Ct'~K ~~,1G,.~''f G~ GYP ~ . 0 ~ /,~f~ / . c/(J ~Gc...~ ~Q ~ t~`~ ~ ~Q~/ LS/ ~ S ~ _S' ♦ ~ ~ IPE FIELD REPRE ATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. • Date , Date L~ -4 ~ IPE CPNS UCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT 11AANAGER 1 Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ . . ~ ~ . . _ i ~ . . . . . . ' ..•f:. • . • . '.1'~ . .'.....~.l..~~~~~.~.. ~ 1~. • . . _ . . ' . . ~ 7 INLAND . ~ PACIFIC , . . NUCLEAR GAUGETEST RESULTS _ ENGINEERING Job Name /~~~~1~'iJ~ W.O. # r~ IPE Job N•. ~070 Field Report No. , Date Tech. DS=- ~ 7'P9 / . . nns= Test FL Below Wet Moisture Ory ~ Max Percent ~ Pass Retest No. Location SG. Elev Density (Percent) Density Oensity Compaction or of ~ ~ - (PCF) (PCF) Fail DT No. ad `.vo F~aT /o g/ clC . . ~ c 1S cnlr r',a Irql I . 0 ~ . . ; - ~ ~ . , . : . . ~ ~ . . - ~ • alnudear.pm5 7~ ~ 9~.b?a 1 ~ - ~ r-~ - . • / r ~G~Ja t' - - e ( ry ~j ~ . , , , ° ' - • ~i~/ Lt--..___ - j-- • - ~j 10 13 12. J ~ ~ - ~ . i~ / ~ ~ - • , / ~ ~ t ~ ' 3. TRA,-{ 1 ' ~ ~ . ~ ~ _ - - . / .01* ~ ~t / ~ ~ '~b(a~" ~ ~/'f , •t CA~ / 5 1 , . _ ' y/ ^-t . ~ . : 7 ~ 7 N.`~\ t'~. _ 2~ ` ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ♦ _ - . - ~ . 5; 20 10 9 , ~ •'~n ~ ► ~ 19 1.2 t ~ y ► 8 ` 18 ACT \ . ~ ~ ~ 17 16 + 14 . 13 7 1 ~ 15 12 61 •J . ` _ _1~-~--- ~ 9 . . L I J r~`> . 1i ! ~ ~ ~ ; 17 18 5 ~j 10 16 r 3 !4 20 A8- C411 2 _~o-~; - 17 12 ~ r~ I / ~ ~ r~• 13 14 ~r + , r ` 7 INLAND - - PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING . . 7_1 Date . Inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival' e T' IPE Project No.: - ~ - aV'afher page Ro. o Client ~ Local Repres ntativ phone number • General Contractor e e sen v p on number ~ A?m s~ ~q~ Subcontractor I E P ect Managerl phone nu~p er C~t c~ ~ Y ~~'S~'~~~`~ IPE Field Representative ~ v • Manp~ wer & Equipment Used oc- ~i%/ - / c ' .~T - ~~'eda r /~►4P,7Y~ G l pc ~ . ,.2 n6,ap a~`r.e A4,1 Comments: ' (Woric Completed AAparenUy G ~"1~ /?J! S~!!'-' ~ ~ ppr Specifications Problems . 'ietr Solutions) !'AI^0,2.,s' ~ ~ a~ d' 4 41!!~) , ~ . /z. ~f _ ~ , ~ ~ JJ • Y•~/ib~ 1 , ~ O• • ~ / ~ ~ • _ _ • ~ • ' . IPE FIELD REPRESENT CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor IPE proJect manager. Date " Date IRtICO14STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT fVIANAGER Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT F ENGINEERING - 717 . Oate inspector's Daily Report No.: , IPE Project No. . ' Page No. ~ ot Pt-loo-7- - ~ Comments: "11 4 (Woric Completed Apparently per Specfficatlons Problems /7 and their Solutions) . ` . ~ a . . . . ' , i . . Non-Conforming Items: - (Project or Standani Speciflcation Observed ConstxucUon is ln Non-Compliance with) . IPE Feild Rep . IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ , - MH ~7H - 2 r ` 9 191.1/19.3 N ~ ~i ~ . MH 7 . . ,vd- .01 2 13 12 11 10 . MH 7G 1 4 2 TRACT WA" \ . -1 v43 . i V IVV 4 ~ TRACT -"A" ~ ~ . 5 ~ 5 . . ~ J . - .d ` y~ . . 6 2 ~ ' ` ~ ~ ' / ~ . ~190.5/18.2 N MH 7J ~ . 7 3 ~ 4. 5 7 6 r21~ ~ . . 192.4/18.0 N 192 ~ EX15T. MH 12-"' \ Z 1 8 MH (RIYk~,RC1NAi.1C 1~5 T AODN.) 191.9/18.3 N / MH 7R ~ ZO ' I . 9 MH 7 ~p . r------ R'~ EXIST. MH 1 19 192.0/18.1 N,' ~ ~ (RNERWA ADD N. 18 190.8/ 17.s' N ~ -11 12 i i 17 16 --k 8 'J 2 6 / 7S ' 3~ 191.6/17.3 N 4 18 .9 8/17.3 N 14 2 13 % - 1,5 i 7 ~ 7, 192.0/17.1 24 ,9,.0/i7.s N / • ~ A~d 7 ~ ` . _ s .6 8 g J / • ~MM 7E 19 ~5. MH 7A / 7 910 192.4/17.1 N i' 1so.s/1s.s 19 ~ 4 . 18 ~ 10.0 /10.0 N 16 17 3 20 --~3 12 16 190.6/16.3 N M 70 ~,bSApo 192.4/16.3 N r~ 24 ~ MH 6.ryp f~c., ~F ~ ~~3~~ , B~~S \ ~ r \ r0-) l 1 ~ . ~8rv ~ V 1000, 1000' -Ol 7 --05 . ~ ~ . (21) ~ ~ SUB A: 21 000, ~ \ ~ , „ TRACT R" ~ X N\BA -N P ;n 19 . 18 '71 ' (18) . f ~ f 7 Lf . -_tAN€ ~ o , I f.X~ _ I ! / ve/ I OVY ~~---~~10 - dAS B F--1 BASNS - _ e) PASIN H ~ i~ '17 ~ ~ - 1? Ei~ ' 6A~ N G AS N . BAS ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - Q ' Q ~ II ~ . " • ~1 lE : 7zh- ,y ~ ~~y r 7 O ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: June 6, 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7th Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ M ~ M Work Authorization LI-J Report No. Copies . Description 1 " Daily Znspection Report #83 dated 5-28-97. ~ PUrpOSe M XI Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ . Remarks " . . , ~ Signed: CC: (DOUR Birch, Pacific Prooerties D•1TRNSMT.PM5 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date l , . Inspectors Daily Report No.: ,0~f2~ ArNval Time . IPE Project No.: ea er rage No. oY Client~ Local Representative/ p26 hone number , resen~~ve one numbergl~t Generai ~Cctor k 6eP P L44-, d9&---5T- SubcIPE Project M=,.,, ger/ phone number ~SG-,4-+~r. l~'~,~•uG~.. lv_5~ - C~`$Lla IPE Fieid Rerese tative ~ftiH-~it1 Manpower & Equipment Used _ Comments: (Work Completed Apparentiy Wig: r4V_e_1va>. aK/ SiT~ -iz~:sPZ,a64-e6S digr T7iC ner_Scectfications Problems • . ' {eir Solutions) I047- / C-M-f /UA / SYST~,( - A u h ~~1Y~fi~ ~ X hcm G.,vD Tlhv- vopRZa~4't-~ aY rN-~s~rL .L~s~.kvC~ 'Di ca vrcia ~ ~u-tl u P A .r_;r..UTVAG ~ '64+13c 1~' , LVNJC , k .1 /,z,,rC~ )444~:~ .•4r.so . /fir < 9004-IC -Y+ pf r4#4x l . r->,k / ~1r~S!a,~_/ ~ tc~i,c.) j~ ,~rts A1a; t F~ICD ~4' Pf-fanl z~'.. ~ I M-J:_5 t~TZ.,__14 LA=~,ITLI4 rtzsa H_i4~ !7Li T 141C ET I,LI TZ-i4~ ~ ~ r?0c7%4 if -n~ A,DTLc S Tmt,::-2,_ 1 i 12~fA1G.- I . ~ . . IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE , CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager; • ~ Date Date t . . : i'~.~ ' . • - • , I~E Cgt~VSTRUCTION•ENGINEER IPE PROJECT fNANAGER V ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: , ~ - 7 . ' ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY ~ ° 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: SPORANE COIIN'1'Y ENGINELRS . 1026 W BROADWAY ADE DATE: JIILY 11. 1997 - SPORANE WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: ID PARRY PROJECT NAME: RTVFRVAT_K ]TA AlliITTTON Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents Work Authorization LXJ Report M ~ No. Copies Descriprion 1 . . DAILY INSPECTION REPORT #A1~~'I" - COVERING THE PERIOD 7/9/97. , . PUIpOSe . IB_I Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ - Remarks ~ - Signed: KATHGRYN EVMTT CC: DOIIG BIRCH, PACIFIC PROPERTIES , D:\TRNShfT.PMS ' INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspectoi's Daily Report No.: -5~~ 5~-- Arrival Time IPE Project No.: - I C) C'w0~ . ~►eatner page No. o 0, 1 1 . Cllent Local Representative/ phone number I C- Doo eq U t ec-4 Generai Contractor 5ite Representativer phone number vo-r- . c e~-~- 'D ov.,.~ ~ ~3 J Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number c Lc~ko aSe.PrPC-: IPE Field R presentative ~--~~-I c~ . - Manpower & Equipment Used Comments: (WoricCompleted ApparenUy • . ~ ( -~s~ -ca-o- - ?ecifications Problems • r eir Solutions) . ~ O F=- Tf-f-~ L-7 A'CLn ~ ~ * oigN-c:gs vF== SP~~ C.._a A no f-~-,~ 4G-C*J Tb S ~ . S? 2~ ~ ~ ~ ~SJ~ ~A~ ~ Q ' ~ ~ ~ At) c7 . S o4L« I n A ~v - - /~ID1~•ilov-, 4740 ~2~LV~.eSt~-f TDL-0 ' ST7 L[.;t~.1D~S~.+H~.s gemv►vxl -7t41r-S^J,r> slk)MA ,~.t~SS ~ ✓tst4-~r' ~,..1 ~i~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construc~on engineer andlor IPE project manager. . / ~ Date Date . IP C TISTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IIAANAGER ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ ' - 7 - . ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers - 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: Julv 23, 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7th DeSCrlpt1011 M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ M~ M~ Work Authorization M x~ Report No. Copies Description _ ~ 1 Dailv Inspection Revorts ~ throueh tlW"'coverinQ the oeriod 7-10-97 throueh 7-21-97.' ~ - ~ ~ PUTOSe . . ;t M Xi Information r~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request,. N ~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ 'Remarks . . ~ , . Signed: CC: Doug Birch, Pacif ic Properties , • D:\TRNSMT.PMS . i INLAND . . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING - ~ LK, . T"- . . Oate Inspector's Oaily Report No.: -7- Io -9-7 Arrival Time IPE Project No.: - l 1 a,~ , ~3~a~o _ i►~eat~'ier - page Ro. o~ Client Local Representative/ phone number ep ~~F--, sa - at-+ sen ~ one numder Genera Contrac r e epe21eiffpch6a /f'~o ,~-r-►~„~! Ct~~ , - ~ ~ v~~-~t Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number IPE Field RepresentaUve ' . Q a ar~ Manpower & Equlpment Used Comments: • (Woric Ccmpleted Apparently 7T4 4/aI7 1-r- vti1 i:~,~ ArS fIxog--,» i dp~o beclflcattons Problems eir Solutions) . {=r, O ~p~C ~ vc~• b ~F-~ r c+_ ~ ~ !~i ~ • ~ s-~ 0,0,i LH16 ~ /62 ~'o e- Coao-Pc..-no,`.t, MoE&-7- of= TN~ &r~ 14pc n bLL)T- ~3r~i•t Ca ,o Pc-CEZr-x,-> ~-T "aadLu- oF= Ttf-c 5 i rc- Vos a-. 1dSPE0-77o wJ Qr-- Tt-F~ SL-rc- L) a o vr~P n 'Llrzrv) -S AlCza:~0,1 t% /67 . . -F>L)me ta ' a.F= 1l0 Amu, , IPE FIELD RiPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer nd/or IPE project manager. Oate Date ZLL-7, 7TION C S UCENGINEER IPE PROJECT (NANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: Riverwalk 7th Addition - Construction Punchlist 16 April, 1997 The items listed below are preliminary in nature due to the status of construction. The items are listed in categories corresponding to the Bid proposal schedules. , Items remaining to be completed: Schedule 1: Street Grading 8. Install Type III bamcades as specified. (East end of Salmon River Lane) Schedule III: Storm Drainage 2. Filtration swales B) All swales need to fine graded, compacted and seeded per the typical cross section . . sheet 10 of 13. 3. `208' Ponds B) All `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted, topsoil installed, and seeded or sodded per the standard details, see sheet 11 of 13. E) All `208' ponds and Tract areas require landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the P.U.D. Site Plan and Landscape Plan.4. Spokane County Standard Drywells; . . . C) All drywells need to be protected from contamination during fine grading of ponds by p adding or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate. Yq.o e C.iv) The inlet in pond "Y3" requires cleaning. . . C.v) The inlet in pond "Y2" requires cleaning. C.vi) The inlet in Pond "Y1" requires cleaning. C.viii) The uilets for Pond "RT" require cleaning. .6. Concrete inlet Type.l C) Inlets must be cleaned and protected from contamination during final grading and seeding by placing or replacing the filter fabric between the metal frame and grate.- (Typical to all inlets) - Schedule V: Curb and Gutter; Sidewalk 1. Vertical curb and gutter, Spokane County Type "B"; C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 2. Rolled Curb, Spokane County Type "R"; C) Broken or rejected curb must be replaced prior to acceptance by Spokane County. A final walk through will be done after all fine grading and backfilling is completed. 3. Sidewalk: A) All sidewalk is required to be 6'x4" thick, include mailbox wraps. _ ji~~,-• ; _ I ~2 Schedule VI: Road Base and Pavement " 2. Interior Roads; B) Edge of asphalt need to be protected during backfilling. Edge of asphalt is failing under heavy loads of traffic. Schedule VII: Utility Trenching B) Coordinate with W.W.P. for street light placement. ' Miscellaneous Items: C) Coordinate with Inland Pacific Engineering for final acceptance by Spokane County. r - - - - Riverwalk 7' Addition - Construction Punchlist Observed Deficiencies - July 10, 1997 0 Genearal ' - No street signs - Pieces of asphalt have been broken away from street shoulders in numerous locations - Sidewalks and curbs need to be swept and cleaned of construction waste (concrete, tar) and debris - Misc. construction waste and trash requiring disposal - All swales and `208' ponds need to be fine graded, compacted and seeded or sodded Mission Avenue - Piles of landscaping sand on the left side of the street - Curbs will need to be inspected when the sand piles are removed - The grate and top 2 rings for the catch basin in pond Y3 had been dislodged and will need to be replaced and grouted - Writing observed in concrete s/w near Sta 27+50 Lt - Chips in s/w observed near stations 16+70 Lt and 21+10 Lt - Inlets for ponds Y 1, Y2 and Y3 require cleaning tl Potomac Lane - - Writing observed in concrete s/w near Sta 11+00 Lt - Chips in concrete wheelchair ramp at McMillan - Four cracked s/w panels near Sta 13+75 Lt , McMillan Lane - Pond P needs to be graded to the required bottom area (14'x 15') ° Three cracked s/w panels near Sta 40+40 Lt and one near Sta 41+20 Lt - - Trash requiring removal under modified wheelchair ramp at Sta 40+00 Lt Rio Grande Lane - Water Valve near Sta 12+10 Lt inset 2" into asphalt Holidav Lane - Drywell in pond K requiring filter fabric ~ l:U)OCUMENT96070-1lpanch71097.wpd ' ~ Salmon River Lane - - Type III barricades not install at the east end as specified - Rubble pile near Sta 21+00 Rt requiring removal - Wheelchair ramp, design B, not install at 27+00 Lt - Drywell in pond Q requiring filter fabric Type 1 inlet at Sta 24+73 Lt covered with plastic and dirt - Inlet grate at Sta 25+88 Lt smeared with concrete, requiring cleaning - Type 2 inlet cracked at Sta 28+75 Lt - Writing observed in concrete s/w near Sta 28+80 Lt - Cracks in Type R gutter observed near stations 25+00 Lt, 26+20 Lt and 28+40 RT Baldwin Lane - Cracks in Type R gutter observed near Sta 2+20 . . . . . A ~ - J ' • w , ~ ' -71NLAND . . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: - -7- lffi-v~ Arrival Time IPE Project No.: - 8~. G,~ - 9~ ot c- -1 ea er ~age ivo. Client Locai Representativel phone number , t~A~►T I c "ba01a ~ General Contractor ~tepresen~vei-p-hone numper Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number iPE Field Representative Kl el-,so'i QU e~.l Manpower & Equipment Used !-AZ.~~~~ w dE L[Lr- C) $j-- ~ ~ 7~j ~ 5z, , Comments: i " - r; 1 (1Nor{c Compieted Apparently • . }laj~ ` n d QSp►~UE ectficatlons Problems eir Solutions) ~ ~ ~~4~•~~ L ~ ~ ~ , / - 1 •t ~ _E?20/vt ~.'..i~..~~c t.A,.JJ 1..,.c..- ~ G~ 11 • - , T`o z5 c- ~ ► ~ , CPr-7,f /n1 . . Ci-Ll,p-N APPerew-, T-o . ~4-✓~- ~T-.t-~~ ~ _111I 'J~~LdO QoCK-S f-fA-ti c-, ,-o . r [_G' , T~ /d~~ ft=~ ron~ Q~ i H-~ t~Fl-~ ~ e~ ~v~ F~ /Y1 A-K..1 - - (,Jo.c 1;=-i L, L- /R-P- I C.-r Fl'7 D x--( BpI.D to ~ ti11Wg IPE FIELD REP ESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer ndlor IPE project manager. Date Date 1 14S RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ 7 INLAND . ~-S . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING 7-+ Q pv a,`j Date Inspector's Oaily Report No.: 19`~ 7 Arrival Time IPE Project No.: - Q ' " ~Cfl 0-70 ~ V~ea~her - iiage No. I ot ( C , ►-4-OT Client ' Local Representatlve/ phone number . ~~~1 F:, ic._._ ~,o0~ t~~ ~t-~ oocv Co4~f -Z~z General Contractor ~ e epresen a~ive~hone number Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number A-2T7'c:~tr c-- #o„~ AV==!D -qe12> IPE Field Representative N Et..Soi Manpower & Equipment Used 1L> C4.1 T/*tp, Z~F i~ 1/ S-`i I Comments: . ` . (Work Completed Apparently -T7 Vi S I T'''~, ~ S~ I T~'~Q Cf~ ~ ~'r= - iecifications Problems • ' ' elr Solutlons) n7 C C7PYT~g~,~ +.l/~ST14 ~.~.-y9-7-~d . . , A-° - ~~A-~ f "T7d►~lf-~! t-~~ - - - _z-P'c-.J MaT- too,,) i 7-,* ~ ~tS tc-= A r-, t,JPts, ST-Arr--i o.l G Uocnw-77QpLsy ~Fc--r-rZ, r A--rtoOJ S vs T-C-171 - Ki trr LQ oN-T - f~ P--r--r~-n IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer a dlor IPE project manager. Date Date / ~-f Z3 4~! IP CO TR&TION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IIAANAGER Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: . 4 . ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers ' 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: AuQust 1, 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk -7th Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter .•M ~ r~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ Work Authorization LXJ Report,- No. Copies Description I' Dailv Insnectiog Re through iLk< cover,i n; . the periocl.'7-22-97 throuQh 7-25-97.• : , . PUIpOSe Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request Written Approval M I Signature & Return M~ Remarks Q - - Signed: - CC: DouR Birch, Pacific Proverties . D•1TRNSMi.PM5 7 INLAND . PACIFIC . DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING -7T1+ p r Date L)Ly ?Z, I9'1 ? Inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Time IPE Project No.: • I I.;'? p 9(, O-7 O.--~ Weatner . rage No. oY - Client . Local Representative/ phone number . ?A-Cl V=l C, D o 06? }!7>( 2Ca+ - General Contractor SlEe-kepresen ve p one numner Subcontractor IPE Project ManageN phone number I~P~cE~- t4o LJ 76,zP~ IPE Fiel R presentative ~ - Manpower & Equipment sed ~ n o P~►~2~ ~.r+v v~..~ , ` - Comments: • - °(''-*CompletedApparently . . AT -rTf -c- T( rv~ E OF VtS IT ~_~'LJO ~~~vVl~ , pectflcations Problems - • • a,... their Solutions) . F~,p M )+j?,-T-75 11...1 ~o►~! 4~ ~ Z , ~'~S~ r3~. C~~~ ~i C.,~~--rl~5 . ~ o . Bc~ v 1 Pm -piT E7e-r,- eD11 S iT'~ . i~:• -PPAr~r- 11~1 A-91~ K:s LAD c-el-c- ~se~e Le-p'° ' 7r,._k U ~IC- IPE FIELD RtPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary unUl reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction enginee and/or IPE project manager. Date Date rI&T E COSTRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IIAANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ' . 7 INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: 7- 23 ~ Le Arrival Time IPE Project No.: - 2- P,,,~ . . 7 c,Po-ro --I Weatner . rage No. 1 or - C~c~-,~ Client ' . Local Representative/ phone number c.+4- General Contractor 3ite eNresen ve p one number Mr, pE~l ti! ? Subcontractor IPE Project Manageri phone number f!~e-Oc_C- 14CXZA-e.a IPE Fietd Representative . . O&Te.6:72 . Manpower & Equipment Used cA.) l't!%~t C,E--04-Ql.L.SW A:~~) Comments: ' • )rk Completed Apparently . 1 fy"~ aL~ Tn :=I rSpeciflcations Problems , < < and their Solutions) . nj= &-7 Iof-Tl OA-2~ )f~157-25-c-~.&T7nAJ ~ G Pt-,( t OtiI ~ ~/,4l4 7TfC 5~e--/^J ~LA<a C-7 05~ /AI 1~~~.1 D Y ~ . -F>i L ES o ~ A PS 67Vr.L Z) F-t.i ✓aaf5o ro Tt+C- 5 rrV F-- F::b^c,0 Yz. C'~,,v c,J ~-s t1~.q-L1 Ls To Ca,.! f~-'r e-v» ~4- S~.rtc-~uc.~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. _ Date Date ~ IP CO TRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ INLANO PACIFtC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING - 7-W . Date inspector's Daily Report No.: Arrival Time IPE Project No.: - 9 c-o o-? .o ~veatner ' . rage ivo. or - Client . Local Representativel phone number Genera Contractor ~~tepresen ve p one numner, ' y Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number A~1ST-r, L&vj 1PE Ffeld Representative~ -~so ~ . Manpower & Equipment Used . - - - V . • . o ~ I i E ~ 1 r w~ F b'F ✓!5 1T _ ~ . ' , . .r • • . . • . . Comments: • ~ - - rk Completed Apparently V 5 1 T'En •_~~T~- To Co£2-- 7't-' Spectfications Problems ` ' and their Solutions) I-p 1 ~ t'orL r~o Cu-r A,.rn THi~ t!5;Po4"Kc..F;e- F~,~-, &7EtD 1 i.l ~oxip Fz> P-- P- L~ A- TIQ~ -F,,-~ i-TYl ~ ~ ~ ti1ST19-t,[_ ~n c::) ►1 -r-tfz-: &J Co ~.O ~►~l C~ es~ f'YI iy;~ S'~ rvt r9G - - - - IPE FIEL REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer an or IPE proJect manager. Date Date ` ` IP ONVTRUCTION ENGiNEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ` _ 7LINLAND . PACIFIC . DAILY FIELD REPORT - ENGINEERING ~ ul~ -7 T ~ Oate tnspector's Daily Report No • 7 - 225, - 9 7 Arrivai Time ~ IPE Project No.: - Ll ; 5o vwh, 9 Co 070 -_I ea er - i'age No. t oY . ~ - ~ - Ciient . Local RepresentaUve/ phone number N::>A~~~,c- 7>-~T7 izf~, lovcq 'E (eo-H- ~C~ f ~ ~'Z3;?- 3 General ontractor ekepresen vefhone ~umber &vm ~ R--rO~/ ~ 41 q iO - 627¢ 191 9L44V-(A-1 Al C~~S7 Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number Af,:rrs rc C. ~•f I~~A-PE ~ P~C~ ~ -C~ -lo `~U IPE Field Representative 11( r'So..l rC.-, eej- Manpower & Equipment Used ow-- ale-#'OToP- C;7 , . . . ~p S-CA,4~rO. . ; t Comments: ^"'-%ricCompletedApparently 8~ ipecificationsProblems r'. • . , • y`~ /f u...A their Solutions) _ L P=iz.i ca p- r r o J ~ C~i,-J &7 v~ f/ G~-~ • t~~ tAl r-o ~01►.1 E~ ~ 2 ~ S PU K- c- 7t6 71445 G./~l D ~STo~Q 71C- Ta ~3~ t7-/~ Dq-~ t'o ~ . . IPE FIELD R ~RESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer and/or IPE project manager. , Date Date . ~ L i C 4TRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT tVtANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: 7 . INL- AND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)158-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: Spokane County Engineers - 1026 West Broadway Avenue DATE: Auizust 8•, 1997 Spokane, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: Ed Parry PROJECT NAME: Riverwalk 7 th , Description - M~ Xerox Prints I~ Copy of Letter M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ Work Authorization M x~ Report M~ : . y. . No. Copies Descriptiorik 1 Dailv Inspection Reports tkft-r &481 covering- , the veriod 7/28/97 throuQh 8/4/97. ' PUIpOSe . . , M xI Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M I Written Approval M ~ Signature & Return M ~ - - Remarks - - ~ - Signed: Kathryn Everett CC: Doug Birch, Pacif ic Properties . - D:\TRNSMT PMS 7 INLAND - PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING v ~7 T'+ Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: - '7 -7 Arrival Tirne . IPE Project No.: /2 . ~(.ldt:~ , _ / ~Ob2 ~ r ~ • ~veather . rage ivo. 1 oir Client , Loca1 Representative/ phone number ~?cvPE~~~ ~ bovea 131 ect+ -0.0 Co General Contractor ZHe FiepresenafiveFp-hone numper Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number~ ka~s-rre_ L a- PG IPE Field Representative . . o►•~T u,~° ~,I ~ ~P~"~ . , . Manpower & Equipment Used l~0►.1 ~ ~L ~ ~T : ~it~2~ pG Vts c?', . . Comments: 'l vic Completed Apparently SpecificaUons Problems ' and thelr SoluUons) /o Ei c..-~ A-r-t o ~.T~ L-~. A-,r "aJ' A*0 OQ -r- P<i A--rc.=n . L' -50m E/~tJ57~-0 ~P~+ AQS , i1V T~E F~ ~ !7'F1-p dO i oe. P, Lo 96WIA-,,:~ 4 -r-o /,KJ ¢0 1 ABwnLg- . IPE FIELO R PRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR,S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE const.ru ' n engineer nd/or IPE project manager. . r .1 Date Date . /~.4^ ~ c. IP COIt UCTION ENGINEER IPE . PROJECT IVIANAGER r- Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ 7 INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING i n+ Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: • - ~93 Arrival Time IPE Project No.: • C7"'&C»o --I ea er . i-age ivo. ' otr . ( Client Local Representativel phone number ~o.~ c~ e~N- ~ Ca44 - Z3Z~ e one num~ General Contractor Me kepresen~av 1 ph M ov N T-P, ~ ~•1 ~~~cS , ~~1 r.t k~ F-Nv e-iro 4 19C~ - C~ 2 74 Subcontractor IPE Project Manager i p hone number ' 1,57-1 IPE Ffeld Representative - 4011~ - Manpower & Equipment Used P'T(S-t'ic UNv.t c~5ert PF;;~ Comments: ' • 'Work Compieted ApparentJy • . ~r S l 'i"'-Cf~ ~ ~ 6 0 ~~~-h~ ~ ~ ~SS •Specifications Problems ._.,d theirSolutlons) . Le:,e-l Cz? A-T-r o +J o ~A-~ ~ ► r~ ~.i . p~o~ ~ ~ . r v ~ La wj&e"-- IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construcUon eng/TRUCTION and/or IPE project manager. . Oate - Date E C ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: . 7 ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY ~ ~ . 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Faac: (509)458-6844 TO:SPOKANE COIINTY ENGINEERS 1026 W BROADWAY AVE DATE: P/ 15 /97 SPORANE WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: DEAN FRANZ PROJECT NAME: RTm$jiATZ 7TFI Description M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ Original Drawing M ~ Contract Documents M ~ M~ Work Authorization (gI Report No. Copies Description ~rj ' . 1 DAILY INSPECTION REPORTS # & COVERING 84/11/97 THROIIGH 8/13/97 . " . `~.J . . PUI-pOSe , , . I-xl Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request M ~ Written Approval M~Signature & Return Remarks Signed: CC: DOIIG BTR('H, PAG7FT . RO .RTIES D:ITRNSMT.PMS INLAND . PACIFIC . DAI LY FI ELD REPORT ENGINEERING u e-e-wrt+ Date Inspector's Daily Report No.: g~yQ ~ 4 _ Atrival Time IPE Project No.: - 96070-1 rNeather . rage ivo. or - Client . Local RepresentativeJ phone number General Contractor Mg'tepresentatlvei-phone number Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number A L.i c 15,T-7 &PE- .~~-•~c_~ tJfc~ IPE Field Representative ,►4 Manpower & Equipment Used - 140tit-f-= o~1 S ~ T'~ Q ~t- i r" c- c~r-= ViS iT" Comments: Mlock Completed ApparentJy 1~ ~~s i T~C~ t 'T'C- 'T-n C t-f-G -r- r-- ,Specfficatlons Problems . . . , .dtheirSoluUons) A-Ti~~ = 4=:r . A-r- T*fiE 414=0 ~*-Ll ' 6i e-r-D E!:) iUes-c~ L c-( r„c TP-r+e.-C t3 j7,- G eo VT---,o • 'A ~ til F.9ff-C:> Ft Ni A- c.._ To . , ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed and signed by the IPE engi neer a/or IPE project manager. Date Date cons7,1 I C STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER ~ Corresponding Deficiency Report No: INLAND . PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING ~i ~ T#+ Date Inspectors Daily Report No.: a,~q ~A0&7 -7 Arrival Time ` IPE Project No.: . C)7 0 . Vveatner ~ . rage Wo. oY ~Client . Lo al Representat~veJ phone number ~ ~O C-~ ~ G2~F4~ ~~P~r -"I S J Generaf Contractor ~Zepresen ve p one numeer ~ l y • l~ l a„f^7~- D~ ~r~-~ . Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number IPE Fjeld Representative Manpower & Equipment Used . , , . ~ - Q PE~~--7-nP : _ f-, , . . . Comments: -^Nork Completed Apparently VrS (Te:'o S±'r;r-- I a 7 CF- Speciflcations Probtems ~ .d their Sotutions) 19-~P- I C~ f:~--Tr vyQf l I~Si~►°t-c_~- ~`1~7ar`I S.' ~-~I.l~ S C' _~4-pi l eA-~.'`~ t3 ~R- L~ `~615~ -J G &7E=fA-t~,~ Ul~ IT ~ C'~ P Cc ~ • ~ L ~,~7F~ S~ 2G 7~ e~G C, E~ f4e-741~)r,- I/\./ , ,o C-7P~ v7~~ t tf~-- V, aL,'►- ~ & Ce=Ea,141 0? - s^` r' A-f-l "m CH-YC--ta c,J 'cf-S p0-029-n. ^-(G~ ~5Y~ 1-0 e-r;-, LDAs r)/L a r/F.Le I rf-c- E;&t,c._ -Fi t5r-D ~.i i~C`~ f4 • _ - - . (A j. ~ . . lPE FIELD RE RESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer ndlor IPE project manager. . Date Date ~ i I It~ e IP CO STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT fMANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: 7 ~ o ' INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY B B . 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: SPORANE COIINTY ENGZNEERS - 1026'W BROADWAY AVE DATE: $LZDLU - SPOKANE WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION : DEAx FnNz PROJECT NAME: RTVFRWAI.K 7TR Description . M~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M~ M~ Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M~ M~ Work Authorization (7) Report No. Copies Description DAII.Y INSPECTION REPORT ~ COVERING 8/21/97. - , ~o 'PLIIpOSe \ . (~1 Information_ M~ Review & Comments MI Per Your Request M ~ Written Approval Signature & Return ' M~ Remarks Signed: KATnYN EVERTT CC: DOIIG BIRCH, PACIFIC PROPERTIES D.\TRNSMT_PMS ~ ' ~ 4,L . 7 INLAND . PACIFtC . DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING - ~t --7`~- Date ~ "7 Inspectoc`s Daily Report,No.: - 2 - (p 0 1 ~ Atrivai Time IPE Project No.: • Weatner . page t3o. Client Local Representatlvel phone number L) 6= t~ General Contractor . MFekepresen ve p one numner ~ Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number A-e--ns-nc-' o~.~~ k> IPE Fjel Representative ~Ct,so~( ~ Manpower & Equipment Used . ~7 - ~ cto ~ ~ ~rnments: irk Completed Apparently • . - V t S ~-rC-1U S I TE7- o e-t-Fc:-eg- ?`H-~ perSpectflcations Problems . ~ and thetrSotutlons) (n>F -T-N-C- e-1 r' Trt-~ Vi! PeT A f~ ,~T 'T-(~-~ T~m~ ~c~~ T ~ Fi,..1 ~ &e-ft-r->E~ O-P-ez,-) A4 ~-P-S - c,J sa~ PL-e-;1J -71,01J L-7 vsTi t.I En PP.~ &f C!Z-:~ . , . ~ A4~ IPE FIELD REPRErSENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction enginee and/or IPE project manager. . Date Date 0 1 CO STRUCTION ENGINEER _ IPE PROJECT f1AANAGER Corresponding Oeficiency Report No: . » h ' ~ ~ r INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: SPORANE COIINTY ENGINEERS 1026 W BROADWAY AVE DATE: 9-5-97 SPOKANE j,TA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT ATTENTION: JnK xAnKE PROJECT NAME: eTVFRT.T~T Tt 7TQ , Description MI Xerox Prints M ~ Copy of Letter N~ M I Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents M ~ MI Work Authorization LK-J Report No. Copies Description ~ DATTY TNSPFCTTON RRPnRT _ - - y ~ FOR 8-25-91 . . . , PUIpOSe j _ Lx.I Information r~ Review & Comments Per You`r Request M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return M~ Remarks , Signed: CC: DOIIG BIRCH - PACIFIC PROPERTIES ~ • D \TRNSMT.PMS '4W INLAND PACIFIC . DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING _ T*'- Date Inspector"s Oaily Report No.: 7 . sr- 97 . / ~ Arrival Time IPE Project No.: -4 - ~C90'7~ ea er - rage ~vo. oY I I Client . Local Representatlvel phone number rf'~.-1 ~rCr 'Q~-D . S ~oc~ ~ i P± Oeneral Contractor ~teNresen v N one n u m b e r Subcontractor IPE Project Manager/ phone number ~ T-tC- L^-r(co=~' vt-pe-7 f--6 cz IPE Ffeld RepresentaUve Manpower & Equipment Used ~ - ESnF~0 r-t---r* . 3 - Lo~$oP_~~~ ' ' Comments: - ,9 --•ir4cCompletedApparenUy . c S 1-r~-t~ To C~t-~e.~ 'Ttt-~ t~o~ Spectflcations Problems ~T o ~ Ul id theirSolutlons) . pF Tj-4--~ L-C nSC ►~/r-~ L~ T{~1 '-1-L1C' i _ Vl o r-= T-2 Pr-e_"r 1---) ~ V l~ o s-r ~ i ~ . l ~-►4C"F'. (i ~ _ o oF T~~-cT ~ s ~~-e_T ~ • . I ~ C~~~( C~ ► rJ c...~ IPE FIELD 110PRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer andlor IPE project manager. . Date Date ; An. ~OE STRUCTION ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: 7 ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: SPORANE COIINTY ENGINEERS 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENIIE DATE: oCTOSEx 24* 1997 SPOKANE, WA 99260 I.P.E. PROJECT 96070-1 ATTENTION: JIM RADKE PROJECT NAME: RIVERWALK 7TH , Description M ~ Xerox Prints M~ Copy of Letter M i M~ Original Drawing Contract Documents Work Authorization M g~ Report M~ ,r • i No. Copies -Description c)av cFj too ~ol 1 DAILY INSPECTION REPORTS #A'T, #A~ #.W iAT FOR PERIOD DATID 10-/9/97 THROIIGH 10/15/97. , • • PUIpOSe ' . • I MXi Information M~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request , . M~ Written Approval M~ Signature & Return - Remarks - ~ . Signed: KATMYN EVERETT cc; DOIIG BIRCH - PACIFIC PROPERTIES;, INC. • D:\TRNSMI'.?MS 7 INLAND - PACIFIC OAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING 7 Date Inspector's Daily Report No.9~ Q~ A9el Y 7 ~ Arrival Time ~ IPE Project No.: 4D70-1 ea er iiage ivo. / oY 5-OS Client / Local Representative/ phone number ~ L1~ General Contractor resen rve p o e number 'r17~ Subcontractor IPE Proj ct Ma Zg er! pho e n mber i~~ y - ~ ~ IPE Field Representa ve ~ Man ower & Equipment-Used T~~..ln,4 /7 Comments: ~ >~-~r'/ ...5~ u'•~~ ~ ~ ~ ..3~',/'tl~ (Wor1c ComPleted APparentlY /I per Specifications Problems - ~ : heir Solutions) j~~ a,/~o e-!) ~'f ~',4 //Y.j 4,7 ='1 ' ~ Zie / . . ~ r ? I=' J~~' C.~ ~ T ~ti.C . f Sf C`,, J _(°_..54 ~ ~P r,/r/;~ M -x'v~ ~ o ~ 14 li /Je~ A 1o,~,4&7Zo,2:%o,, ~t.Id lf~ ~~-~i s da- 4 /i 6e, / k Q ( : C_... a ~ ~~`7 • l._-e 1A! 1 ~GLL1.... / ' T ~l--~ ~ IPE FIELD EPRESENT~/"~A(E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE • This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction enginee and/or IPE project manager. . Date Date . I~ . , Ined CO S RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: - 3 4 , GRAPHIC SCAI.E 2~ AVENUE . ~ 8 Q 1 00 ~ lN 1~ 4' ~ I ttwCh " 3 k q667O`I t' ca Pr! I< v ~ , `~=J 5 6 7 ~ c.t.-,c,~'J , ' 03 ~ 1 ~ ''a•" ~ ~ 1 ~ 12 kcT ' n. ~ ~ ; 2 Ror cl.~ ' tn~ .~s ee ~ ~ 6 404 ~ ~ ~ .0o, ~ b ~ i oo, 47 ~ ~ ♦ ~ ~y.~\ , l/ t►+A,~//` ` M1'~ ~ , ` r' ~ ; " - R~`,; LR'~r ~ • •5 C~ cy ;;~+~`~t'"'' y/ y~~~,~~/ ~ ~ ~ ~ : i r t \ ' ` 7 ` ~ t S~ o . ~ , ♦ ~ ' _ _ - - `o. ` ti~~~ ~ ~ ~5 - a, ~ . o',~ ♦ i 00 ,,v ~ %?'1 ~ " ~ . ~ ~ . " 1 C 1 j \ ' 1`~ ' ~ 1 8 ~a RAcT 5y %N ~ - - ~ T 6 ID ~ ► 7 38 ,r~ 14 7,.~ _ ; 3E 7 14 c, (1,8~ J ~t 1 ~0 . ~ j lA~+IE I 7 s ! -~f - - - - ^ ~ ~ GUSTA 7 , ~ ^ , 11 t3 ~ 10 16 M 8 ~ ~ ! 1 25 ~ t ) ♦ ~ ~ ,p ~ ~l 7 ~ - Gj ~ 22 i E 1,. ~ 14 - - - ' ~ 4 ~y `j r.- r-+ ~ • 7 INLAND ~ PACIFIC ~ DAILY FIELD REPORT ~ ` ENGINEERING Date inspector's Daily Report No.~~`~ 1 Arrival Time IPE Project No.: n/ 1 a 70 - Weather ~ iiage No. of 3 Client / Lo al Representative/ phone number G"i ~ I" ~ C'. / P~'/'i'' ~ ` . General Contr:7acd-e,; iR resen v p o e number ~ ~ ~ f P S7 9 ' . Subcontractor IPE P' ct Ma er/ ho 749/- ~ p IPE m~ -..Field Representative Man o er & Equip ent Used ~ . Comments: J A -.yL.._,. ~ / , .J • ~ ~ (Woric Completed Apparently { -vo 12S ~ .°~r'''~.~ • D y/f' S S. er_Snecifcations Problems • ` ~ ' l ° J ~ V %eir Salutions) 7~ ` ~ ~ _ C / (/l ! . ~r : 67 ~A-, /V/ • / r'~ ~ !v .~t:~ri ra A/ T z~ c' r . f ; . ~ ~~.•C~ 6P,~ ~ 1 14, ;4 , a A,O,a.1-4 A. A . ~'rl v, C--e 14c fZ IA J .1 .4 u' . 1,0 /i v r i P i /r ~ ~ Al-l / (5 e eo~ ~ . _ -00 IPE FIELD REPRESENT E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary* until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constru ;on enginee andlor IPE project manager. Date Date C) IP CO S RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IUTANAGER C) , Corresponding Deficiency Report No: 7 INLAND PACIFIC ' DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date . Inspector's Daily Report No` ~,7 Z&l a(, IPE Project No. Page No. ~ ot r~ / Comments: la.,e 1..?-~ v~a4Z~ .l'i (Wor{c Completed Apparently je P perSpecificatlons Problems ~~~(~j2a/ and eir So uttons) ~J !''K . . - ~ ~N n o r' g e ( t ta p o e d o s n • on- om I nc wi ~ IPE Feild Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep • ~ " '7t 4 ' GRqpNiC SCALE 200 too so 1~ INDIANA A~UE . - ~ ~ . ~ ~iN~~ ~ ~ 1 t~n 4 q~o~U-I 1 2 i-q r w ~ t~ .8 rie( 6 ~ ` oF 3 ~ ~~r' ~ • 4 ~ ~ ta~c ~ ~ y ~ 3 s 4 - i EAl.D1M~`U~'~E " ~ . ~ i , ~ i / v J i 10 ~i~ ~ ' 13 1 \I.,_/ n . / - Rr;CT Q e 14 ~ oool ~ \ (ZON lool' ; V ; ~ ~ ~ \ ~ i ~ 010i ~ ~ ` TR~'`~.:` A` "~~f'~``•~~1~~P ~ . ~ ' ; TRnC~ y~`~, \ \ Rtv~Rttn ~ A 1'1f1 Tt~1061 ` K5 ~ y ~ r 98~ ~ ool ~ :*j ~ 3 Q ~ ~ ~ 4 /.-1 a - ~ ~2/~~~ 5; lo - TRACT 5 y/ 38 1 16 4130 _ ~ 7 , 12 2 14 13 ' t 14 6 :5 ~~8~ _ ~ , ~ $ ~ sy " - /f ► (;tJ'TA LANE I 20 t ~ 6 Q ~ ks ` ~ 1 fD 7 --..`N 1 ~ ~ 10 10 ! c i `8 19 1 {iJ Ln-5 r '8 16 4. 6 . ; ~ j ~ 1 ) o ` ~ • . 0.5 20 7 3 5 17 12 7 aUSKY ~E~ 2 14 ~ ~ ~ ' - - - ~ 3 7 INLAND PACIFIC DAILY FIELD REPORT ENGINEERING Date , Inspector's Daily Report No.: ~ Arrivai Time IPE Project No.: ea er page lvo. ot Client ~ Lo al Representative/ phone number General Contractor ~ite presen ve p one number n~..t.,-, l~t , ri~.~ S~ d~vZ~t c~,~l.~_.~a-h s,~.9!~,• . Subcontractor/~ IPE Projec=Mnagerl ho~e number a i`~,/'i:s / ~ IPE F1eld Representative . ~ . Man ower & Equipment U d le) ZZ?.x~ / Comments: l • ~ y . (WoricCompletedApparently._1~/ P ~'/'~'il~/'.!~ ~9:✓I _S/ /~2 ~ ~~.3_'~%~./~~2. -/~,1/'r per Specifications Problems : -`heir Solutions) l~rY.FS ~i`•; " ~ ~6~t ~~'1`~~" Vl ~'d'LtG~' ~~Q - ee GP S ~ 0~ / J ~ 1 C~ S ~ f,~t ~-e ~l~ . ~ i~ ~ / . . c-~c ~l s .f~~~-~ ~a . ~ ~S'1~s~. ~u~' ~~s.~' r/' l'1'~~ ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENT E CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered preliminary untii reveiwed and signed by the IPE construc 'engineer 7,~ lor IPE project manager. - Date Date ,.1-0vl IP O RUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER . Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ J INI.aNo PACIFIC . . . . DAILY FIELD REPOt ENGItVEERtNG TW A."„p Date tnspector's Daiiy Report No.: OI . Art'ivai 1"!me IPE Project No.: - 4 rz.a.w. , 9&0-70--( . Weatner • rage No. I of ~ . - 1 • Cltent . Locai RepresentaUveJ phone number `]!>t 2-r-N- . General Contractor ~Zepresen ve p one numoer - Subcontractor , tPE Project Managerl phone number e_~ 90 - IPE Field Representative-- f . ~Gc.Sv~ • ' Manpower & Equipment Used ~o~c-r-~ P►-~,l - b4 ~c _ ~ - ` , ~ - . ;Comments: : • ork CompleEed Apparently A-C. L~ C•1 np- &TST'tC- perSpeciflcatlons Pcoblems - and thelr Solutlons) E~, L 8- J 0 Sc~ C#C--E'- .t - L~ 1~I c,~~r n► ~ S,~-~.mO~S 12-~ t J~ C,~.~(~ 6ST t~ 04+ -7 3LT t -r~ ~a~ . C o v;~ So i u ~ 0-~.E-A-e-4FF~ . ,4 LL~c,.L ~ s oOVI o -*T- rt-►Os~ ---r,~ I tj L, c -rs i n1 7-H-U- i'--b,..i c~s ,6LoA1(= gj~.! 59--C) T1 E2.D PE,,,0-. 4t~r! C',Jf T! . ~o Dr~ ~ v ~ . ~c. S~ ~ A- ~ n TH-~--r TN-~ ! 2~ ► &,A--rro, r Q Es (~oc:A-r~ ~4--r- ~4P P2c~~ i~~-r~c~~! ~T►~ 19-3 t So "~r 1PE FIEL6REPRESENTATIVE CONTRACTOR`S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be consldered preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engin r andlor 1-PE project manager. . . Oate Date • ! ~ ~ E NSTRUCTION ENGINEER . IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER ~ - Corresponding Deficiency Report No: . 7 INLAND . ~ PACIFIC DAILY FIELO REPORT -5 ~ ENGINE,ERING.-. tO -7T* -P-.~-- Oate ~ o 9 7 Inspectors Oaily Report No.: . IPE Project No. ~ Page No. oY Comments: c- nj-- --~t~ c1 _&S (Woric Campleted Apparentty per Specificatlons~problems tA3pv~- and thelr Solutions) A P_&c46ET- .s2F E-0 [P_Q J 6-7 1A.--r7 oiL U1~ t~'~sL, r~ To ~eY1 A~r'r o~.~, v ~ • i . ~ , ► ♦ - ~ a Non-Conforming I ms: (P c o~ d cff icatlon se C ZS is tn Non-C mpli nce with) . Aln ~ ~ IPE Fiald Rep IPE CE IPE PM Contractor's Rep ~ . - . . • ' . - ~ INLAND PACIFIC . _ , DAILY FIELD REPOR' ENGINEERING 7A- Date - Inspector's Oaily Report No.: ~ 0(1 ~ ~ - I oZ Arrival Tirne IPE Project No.: ' ~O.'Or") . , . _ y~o7o~"/ . Vveauner / ~ rage fvo. / ot~ d~ . Client Locai Representative! hone number General Contractor • i e epr en 6v~4ephone number ~ . .&-t- eA~70'L- { ~.~oc -jr2fy Subcontractor . IPE Projec Manager/ phone number , . . . , ~i'r~~. /;~4~~t.e.~,~►,~-,~~~~~' . IPE Field Representative ) • Man ower & Equipment Used V-01 . . i`/<~ i~..~..~ P'.~r' ~ ~.l..i :c.~-~.~~.v~~ • . omments: %Woric Completed Apparently perSpecifications Problems f l ~?K~., eirSolutlons) G/~ ls / ~'1 ~7 I? G~' f'~ and th . Or _ . ~ . . ~ e e; L/ - v . • , ~ . - - ,h.~Z T~ , Mn I&A c 001tri~-~..~..r~~ . - ,5 S'~l~l~ ~ IPE FIELD REPRESENTATI CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered 'preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construction engineer a dlor IPE project manager. - ' i~ Date Date l ~ I E CO STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~r- ~ << ? ~ _ ~ . 200 pvENUE GRAPHlC SCALE L • ~ 50 100 100 f( ch ~pp ft.. 1 ~n ! q6oZ0-1 i6t 1!e f W A Gj ? q ~ , ~ ~e,~rT-a 9 rie1c ~C 6 F3„ •00"7 LIIIE ~ Oi ~10 ~ i uj / ~ / cp ~i 1 r.. , tx S~ f r ; ~ \ /~v y ~ / /O / • / 4 n + oo~ f •s ~'J ~ `~i ~ <1 .0e 100, i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~►4~ ~ ~ c~~ TFt~,~ a ~ 00, ~ ~ ♦ ~ A/ nr cy i ; 5 •"rJ ~.1 loe - ~r ) ~ ~ r~ 1. ~ ~ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i r ~ ~ ~ ~ S z~__y 4 ~ - c~ . v • / ~l~'/ ~ ~ F,• ~ ;q / ` ~ ~ ,y~ ~ y • s ~ ~ ~ 4 I ~ R Ja I T~CT ~ 17 4 38 t ~ ~ f ~ ` 16 I ~ 14 1,3' 1 / _ H 3 14 l / •F ,tC p, 1 ' n ~ ~ ~ ~ l'~ ~ S ' % 1 ~ tANE 1 r t 3 , r 19 i T' . at ~ `y P3 ~ ► ~'~5 '1 1 ~ j ? ~ < < - ~a ~ C) 6 3 q + a ~ ~ r - A~, ~ • ~ 7 ~ ~ 47 I 0~ ~ t ~ y4 r ` ~ , `1~ ` J~ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ / + - • i 1yisKy ~ ~ q 14 --J, %w~ , ~ • ~ l 1, ' , ~ _ - -r - - i~s•,~.~-•..~~.,~--'.2`sf'"`~ I G ~ ~ _ "I' ~'r"" ~~~,.~•n _ „f;e~..~ t • . ' , . f , INLAND - PACIFIC . DAILY FIELD REPOR i ENGINEERING Oate Inspector's Oaily Report No.: ~ ~~~4<1 ~17 . to3 An-ival Time ' IPE Project No.: Weatner page No. / o . Client ~J Loc I Representative pho e number Generai7bontractor ~~7 ~ Site e esen ve p ono number Subcontractor 21PE roct Magerl pho e mber .,~~~.c~~ ~i S~-~" IPE Field Representative Manpower & Equipment Used ~ - . . ' • 'r ° ' )mments: , . Ioric Completed Apparently --4 ,P perSpecifications Probiems and their Solutions) ~ ~v p.~-- ~ ,,t Sir~e ~i .7`7 _.1- ~ . . . ~ ,~-C.r~ A ~ r .S ~~.P ,/`i~) . . , ' ~ . e-•-~VE IPE FIELD REPRESENT_A T. CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE This document and referenced addenda are to be considered 'preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE construct~Qn engineer nd/or IPE project manager. " ! Date Date w / i~ • _ / f 1 ~ I C STRUCTION ENGINEER IPE PROJECT IVIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: ~ , . ~ • • • - . • - 7 INLAND PACIFIC : . DAILY FIELD REPOR ENGINEERING ~Oate , inspector's Oaily Report No.: 4 /X~Od 3? -2 1o4 . Arrival Time ' IPE Project No.: ' RTe`affi er loo .i iiage l~o. or tj ~GJ,.S Client Loc Representativel phon number . General Contractor ~ i,~ ~ sen ve/ ptio e number il'/-~ tw " - 7,W Subcontractor IPE Project M n ger ph ne umber + - - . IPE Field Representative A~~~ el 1~~ Manpowe~r_~ Equipment Used ;omments: ' L ` (Worit Completed Apparently _LP_ G/'-/' ~#~-~'i/ lY/9 1-5 . f~c.~" ,4, S.eti'ZJ perSpecffcatlons Problems • . . A ; and thelr Solutlons) S / ~ t / 1 1 ~C7P A_ /X e'~. . i - . - . . IPE FlELD REPRESENT IVE . CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE . Thls document and referenced addenda are to be considered 'preliminary until reveiwed and signed by the IPE constr;PE tion engine ~ndlor IPE project manager. Date Date CO STRUCTION ENGINEER !PE PROJECT NIANAGER Corresponding Deficiency Report No: - • _ e- ' 1 i. C4' ^ ~ _03, ~ 4 ~ . ? . . _ - i , . , p~p,; `AVENVE . ~ GRAPHIC SCPLE 200 54 loo 10t1 ~ i " 100 Q ~ 0-70 L....) A ~ K -7 ~ ve r ~ ~b ~ ~ I' ~ ~ , - ~ ~ r r f e. ( c~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ t CA / `f ' v~ / / ~ / t ~ \ \ ~ r / / ~ • ~ c~'~ ~ z ~ 1~. ' '~►~~t~` { ~ / ~ ~ . , y,,s ~ , ~ ~ , ; • ~o ~ 5 r~~ 00X 04 100, , \ .01 ~ ~ r 4 ~ 4 v 1-1 Ile i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~F 1 ti ^ I`,~, y ~ ~ Qa , ~ • ~ ~ Ij ~ ~ . . --r- A \ / y ~ T5 ~ 'r " ♦ `~s'`~,, ~ ~ ' t~. f a Cj - ~ \ ~i,~ry ,-.v ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~Yy ~ ~ ~ T . ~ 7 ~ ` ' _ ,00- ~ r ~ ~v < N! / 50 LC Eg , loe~ ~ / h~ ` - r~ ~ i 1 ~ 1 ' J' ~ n , i? i TRACT ` '1 '6 , ► i 1 ID . ~ ~~4 13 _ Q 1 • / ~ ~ - J % ~ " f S y ' "--r----~--- ` ► 14 _ J t1,8 _J UGVSXA A 19 1 ~ ry ~ r, R 1 jQ O ; ~ ~I* i 14 ~ ~ s t - - 1(^'~y ~ ~S ~ ♦f t~T1►^ ~ ~.J ~ ~i. ' «Mrf s'~~ . _ _ - ..~.<<.