Loading...
1992, 03-19 VE-5-92 Zoning Adjustor HearingDEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR • TO: 710N tN (c,•/...1..S-toe, Planning Department FROM: Tom Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator DATE: 3 - L"l — 4=1 �. RE: File Number: v e- 5 " `1 Address: C. 18 5O 5 SIAM AtrE A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked box(es) below: The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department; e.g., State Building Code Act regulations such as requirements for fire hydrant/flow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment, barrier -free regulations, energy code regulations, and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation. Ve issuance of a building permit by the Department of Buildings is required. tvi Requirements of Fire District No. j— need to be satisfied during the building permit process. The applicant is advised that the private road shall be named and signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event that the Department of Buildings determines addressing on the private road is not acceptable. However, at such time the Department of Buildings feels the need for the road to become a private, named road, the applicant/owner shall participate and cooperate in this process. The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction and proximity of exposures. Based on information presented to this office regarding this subdivision, the minimum fire flow established by code of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required. Hydrant distribution will be as follows: Residential Development(s). Fire hydrants shall be located at roadway intersections wherever possible and the maximum average distance between them shall be no furhter than 900 feet and these hydrants shall be placed so no portion of the structures are in excess of 450 feet from a hydrant. This department has not received verification that the required water plan has been submitted and approved. Before any building permits are issued, the water system shall be installed in accordance with the approved water plan. Certification that the installation complies with the requirements of the plan shall be submitted to the Department of Buildings. We have no requirements for this proposal - existing conditions. No additional comments. Specific comments are as follows: CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION WEST 1303 BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0550 • (509) 456-3675 FAX (509) 456-4703 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY, CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 NOOTO©C OF SPOMMIE COUNTY ZOONONO QDJMSTOGI PUBLM Iri1IEMOf`t�G DATE: April 15, 1992 TIME: 9:45 a. m. or as soon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department 2nd Floor Hearing Room, Broadway Centre Building 721 North Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 AGENDA ITEM #: 3 File: VE -5-92 VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK STANDARDS: LOCATION: East central Spokane Valley, north of and adjacent to Sinto Avenue and approximately 500 feet west of Barker Road, in the NE 1/4 of Section 18, Township 25N, Range 45 EWM; 18505 E. Sinto Avenue. PROPOSAL: Build an addition onto the front of the existing residence, creating an approximate 40 foot front yard setback from the centerline of Sinto Avenue right of way; whereas, section 14.616.325.A.1. of the Zoning Code of Spokane County requires a minimum front yard setback of 55 feet from the centerline of the roadway right of way. EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential 3.5 (UR -3.5) SITE SIZE: Approximately 13,320 square feet APPLICANT: Susan Anderson 18505 E. Sinto Avenue Greenacres WA 99016 NOTE: ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF SIGNING OF A DECISION REGARDING THE ABOVE. APPEAL MUST BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING, NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WA 99260 APPEAL FEE IS $120.00 (Section 14.412.042 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County). VE-5-92/Agenda 4-15-92 VE - 5 - 92 ,01 �v Ctoce- _ _ ---- _ pcoponecl odd;tion I 2t a R HT (D \,13 ? _ ,tV T- proposed ?t' add i+Ion old G at Ns �.. 7 v 0 r 'r° oc i on J I I J- .1bo SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING AD.TUSTOR Certificate of Exemption No.: / ��- Application No.: V6 -O' Name of Applicant: 61..1,--).1 Rnd e (S() Y1 Agent: Sheet Address: 1 `65C5 5; to Ave Zip Phone - Home: 9).(,&- 1R7L, City: Greer0C C r e S State: b A Code: CPU/ b Work: Agent's 'No.: Name of Property •Owner(s): trl c' bU C, Street Address: Zip Phone - Home: City: State: Code: Work: REQUES 1ED AC 110N(S) (Circle appropriate action): Variances Conditional Use Permit er: Expansion of a Nonconforming Use FOR STAFF USE ONLY Enforcement: Section f Township + Range 1-15 Enforceforce ment: Y' ation/ •Lot and legal checked by: L2 •Easement legal checked by: •CWSSA Water (purveyor): -iso )tle / •ULID Agreement needed: Y N -Existing zone: (,! /e-'3 , �ite Applicable Section; /'{ , (o /gip, 5..2.5- -Arterial Road P1designation: of cJ ' -Comp. Plan designation et1-6),_ -Fire District: b 1 *Personnel doing preapp conf.: ) ( -Other/previous Planning Department actions involving this property: -Hearing Date: '4- 16 -9 •Mainz. agreement checked by: ABOUT THE PROPERTY fr.e ' # 3 y 4 30_ CZ) -Existing use of property: DC i` J 214-e_ ri \ ; (,9 -Describe proposed use of the property: I, •If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance sought in comparable terms: �,�� , _c u 'l kin c' % c c c j e vc\ce e Tke Cr te. reiLtIr s SS' cit b2C\C tz. ro ces, Co asl V5LA.; lent"\ . c! PtoPOsc d t or1-y. C-06-1" Sa+. Sacic„ -cam✓ �k e •If a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards? Y N. If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y N. •What is the size of the original parcel if this proposal is a recent or proposed division? -Street address of property (if known): 2 . 1 g . o s S; n -y- o Fav e •Legal description of property (include easement, if applicable).; E . •7 S 4 e t 6 f' s0 L< `�' h r 4.04- S f ' h 1 `( �, _ tot (-)n 441 e t .k)e-Vi" S t, LA- h � <% �{ ' L � �) c k /6 Ve 4 Vivi,' A cod . �' B fl •Parcel No(s).: ,S 5 / / • ,-4 3 r C, % -Source of. legal: •Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: , -What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? STA 1hOFWASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: AUTHORI7FD AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SI 1.b.; FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLE (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: AND (3) SUPPORTING DOCUMENT'S ARE MADE DGE. Signed: ,A ) QnyoLc�,a-M -, ((Address: z, . i 2eiS O S r n +.0 A-0 e - Ph e,No.: 92.6-tfr7 Co Date: —i y -9 c___: . in d for �, ar page 1 of 2 tate of Washington, residin . My appointment expires: BURDEN OF PROOF necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return it with your application. B. SIGN -OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES •SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT a) Proposed method of water supply: b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Th - applicant has been infonned of requirements and standards. (Signature) (Date) i• (Sign -of SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT tion has b n helto discuss the. proposal. The applicant requir a is an ./standards. l� Litz / —/Z c7z-- (Signal ) A preli has b (Date) (Sign -off Waived) SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waive preliminary if outside WWMA) A p ary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been inFomled of require rpe,'z�cjsd ds. / ? -9Z-- (Signature) gam(Signature) (Date) (Sign -off Waived by Planning?) The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with C-bv»4d c7 to become informed of water system requirements and standards. (See #4 below) The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with 4-4-. to become informed of sewage disposal requirements and standards. (See #5 below) WATER PUR VOR:,, es /Is/ /t/7 The propo located within the boundary of our future service area. The .roposaI s not located within the boundary of our current district. W r e i • able to serve • •s site with adequate water. ,` ang- - en .11.1_ - . - s • been made,to serve this proposal. .0041/' 2,//179? (Date) b) c) d (S ignaere) S. SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. ZA; APP REV; 1,91 (Signature) (Date) page 2 of 2 VARIANCE BURDEN of PROOF Form Introduction to this fornix.. A "variance" is the mean' by which an, adjustment is merle in the application of the specific regulations of the zoning classification for a particular (the subject) piece of property. This property, because of special.circurnstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity 'and in a similar zone classification. This adjustment remedies the difference in privileges. A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in the zone classification in which the property is located.. The following questions will help to determine the outcome of your request. Your request requires accurate and complete responses. First circle either the, "yes" or thc "no" answer(s). following the questions below as they apply to your situation and then explain as needed (in the space provided) to make your unique situation clear. Certain phrases from the Spokane County Zoning-Codc•scetion-on-variances arc included in these questions: They arc underlined. If your request is a ROAD I-RONTAGE VARIANCE please answer only questions A,B,C,D, and E. NAME: S L ? d e ('Son MLLE NUMBER A. Will this variance permit a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? Yes No Explain: B. Are there special cixcumstances (lot size, shape, topography, location, access, surroundings, etc.) which apply to thc subject property and which may not not apply to other properties in the vicinity? Yes CTI? Explain C. Is the subject property dcprjvcd of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the Vicinity and in a Similar zone classification? ( Yes No Explain: 7here -6-c2 \K:Mej •ulna ?.“e roikch C1,o3e.r c )(2_ co6d -LheN n Lx)h�-t. to e 0CrP e . D. Will this variance be harmful to thc public welfare or to other properties in the viciniand a similar zone classification? Yes Explain: E. Arc there other similar sirua ' s in thc vicinity in a similar zone classification? No Are they permitted uses ? (Yes No Are they "nonconforming” uses? Yes No Explain: See a eeEfin n F. Could We subject property be put to a reasonable and permitted use by you or another person without the requested variance? Explain: G. If this request is granted, will the subject property be more environmentally sensitive, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic property? Explant: he cvA rye e eD(1 W t (( -1 (N, n-� e c- i � � S Over please Rev: 5/22/90 Page 1 No H. If this variance is granted, will the broader public need or interest be served? No Explain: Will this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies to the subject property?. Yes Explain: J Will approval of this variance grant to the subject property the privileges of a different zone classification (in other words would this be a "dc facto" zone change)? Yes Explain: K. Will this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Explain Prn e( 1- ) (, l n U[ her [Ace. L. Is this variance required for a reasonable economic return from the subject propert or is the existing structure too small? Explain: Did the practical diffi nl which caused you to apply for this variance exist before you owned the subject property? Explain: \I. If approved, would this variance affect land use density regulations which exist to protect the Rathdrurn/Spokane:Aquifer? Explain: Yes Yes -he following space is for further'explanation. Your application will get better consideration if ghat, how, and why you propose your application is clear. Attach an additional page(s) if needed. U,%e u.)0(,( (d 1.16 e �-cJ e_ x-pand hoe e )D/ o h e h (er:on t) Side . e r e L 5 noLuov ,ho hL3 could' hi nderonc 6,6 one Ln O u r aced.. e' e6±, c 1 home- S On OLS block o re0dv ‘&he_ cl- nee u0h is eu�t P ro p o5`e . )u are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in su ort s application (we have the equipment to display video to PP of e -equired and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of ss needescwhidch11 lto beerial lsidered in relation ;to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure be followed feel free to contact the Spokane County Planning Department (456-2205). Page 2