HomeMy WebLinkAbout26137 PE-1504 SULLIVAN PARK CTR
06P23157 14:15 FAX 50946$8454 HANSQN INnUSTRTE ig 001
~
F A C
Ta: C]aVe Berto, L.S.
gf; 5pokane County Public: Norks
Faac: 324-3478 ,
Pages: 2, including this coveiP si ieet.
Date: June 23, 1997
Dear Dave•
I caNed you about 2.470 this afternaon ap again I need your signature on the enclosed Caunty Fund
Escraw Account {erter. Pfease let me R~now when it would be convenient far yQU ta have me rome
'sn for yos.,r signature
Sincerely,
Hansarr fndustries, lnc.
5ally M:Lan
Rea4 Estate 5ecretary
From the d$sk of
5alfv Mc Gaw•an
Rea} FsTate 5ecretary
PtJ Bux 73 10
5pokane.lNA 99L07-03 10
, 509-468 ?iflZ
Fax 509-468-$,454
06109/97 10:04 FAX 5094888454 gAA15QN TNAU57'RTE 0001
F A C S M L E
To: Dave Berto, L.S.
QF: 5polcane County Public Worics
Fax: 324-347$
Pages. 6, induding this cover sheet.
Date: June 9, 1997
Please firrd 5 signed off capies of the Nansos/Phce Cousty Fund Escrow Accvunt. Deara Franz said
that you needed the signed around eopies for your i1es.
Srncerely
HanSon lndustries, lnc.
Saliy Mc Gavran
Frcrm tYse desk of
5agy Mc Gavr3n
Real Estate Secrerary
PO Box 73 10
~pokane, wA 99207-03 10
509-468-71~~
Fax- 504-$68-$454
RESaLUTIoN No. :98 O1OIL
BEFORE THE Bi]ARD UF CUUNTY COMNITSSIf}NERS C1F SPOKANE COL]NTY, VVASHIN+GTDN IN 'PHE MA ESTABI..TSHMENT
'`T~~2 7
(7F IiYDIAMA AVEN[JE ) R E SOL CI T I ON-
CL]UNTY ENGTNEER'S RaAD FILE Na. 2624 } ES T ABLY S N MEN T
Aio AsseSSar's Tax Parcel iVumber Flssigned -Public Raadways
This being the day set for the hearmg on Sprakane County Engineer's Reporc on the prognsed
establishment of [NDIANA AVENUE, praceeduigs for which were initiated by PRELTINIINARY
P-E$OLUTIQN NU. 984)043, and it appearing ta the Board on proaf duly rnade that Notice Qf Hearing was
published and posted in the maruier and for rthe time requtred by law. and the Board after examrning che rcport and
maps of the Spokane Gvun(y Engineer and a➢l CtaIC!'!5 dfld PapeI'5 on file and after heaEmg all other evidence
adduced at the hearing; and ,
IT FURTHER APPEARTNG that the rlgtits of way have teen dedtcated as publQC road, variable widEh,
and that said road is a public necessity and the same should be opened and established as Counry road-
THEREFC]RE BE IT RESQLVED by the Board af County Cornmissioners of 5pokane Caiunty,
Washingtan, that the hereinafter ciescribed road as reparted by the Sgakane County Engoneer on the 3rd day af
Februairy, 1998, being more partxcuiarly described as follnws:
INI)IANA AVEN[TE - r+ariable width righc of way, from ihe existing fndiana Avenue at the east
line aC the Sauthevest Quarier vf SecEion 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. easterly t❑
the west line of Sullivan Road at the east iine ❑f Section 14, Tawnship 25 North, Range 44
E, W M. as shawii on glans on fale in the Office 6F the Caunty Engineer fae Sullivan Park Center
and Binding Site Plan 4$-95 anti rxght Qf way plan for Indsana Avenue dated NaVemUer 24, 1997
and appraved by thc County Engincer an i3ecember 15, 1997,
and as shown by Che records and maps on fi1e in the Offce af the Spakane Counry Engineer be and the same
herehy is esta9alished as Coun[y rvad and the same shall be kriown as INT)IANA AVENLTE, Road Fi3e Ncv. 2624.
Th,e raad supervisor of Zhe rcaad districc in which the said raad is loeated is hereby directed to open and rnaintain
the same for public use and trawel.
of February, i}38.
APPROVED BY OHEdayl
ICDNERS
$pARD OF CCJGNTY G~C?MiN[SS
OF SP{3ffANE CQUI~'!"Y, WASHSNGTON
i` !d'. lt~LJ' 4F1C'►}R
A'"I'EST: W t LLIAIVI E
CLERK OF THE SQAR❑
~ M. KATE MCtA5t.IN, vlCE-CH141R
I3y
LDEPUTY
?JRSKE~.LEY
.
r,
~
FA',
~ •,r-~~•- ~ ~ ~ ~ -
~ . ~ s= ~ 6 I - ~ ~ o • `
'~=y~l~ W- I~~s~ ~ g ~ • ~ .
rlPl _ars fE~r-~ ~ n G4r ~
1 _ , ` L.,@ .6'~,f • ~y~ ~g 2 ~ ~ I ~ ~„T.. ° ~ _ r~ ~ -'S~ I - - ~ ~ ~ ! r~,~ „ L
^+r ~ ~ ' l~ ~as~~~'• v.~.....o. ~ T - ~ e~~~~ ~ m ~ ~4LI
~ ' , .~-r ' - - ~
r
~ ~'r ~I~~ ~ + _ ~ n _ ~ ~ i . . _ y~~ _ ' . . l ~
t .
a9^66 -.F 11 y=~'~
g~ • ,o ~ ~
- 9 l. Y I • ~r ' 'ti li ~ _ ~ ~ r ~ J~_ ' _
_ ~ _ _y.~~r _ _ r. ~ h ~.il~ ~ i ~ '4_ . • . a
• ~~I~s-~~~;,,~~ - ~ { ~~~i ; ~ o •
.
~5-r/.~ MP L, SPH M a WT
JWOJAW& IiVE.
.
tZ F= 4
3RD BQND IREEM CT1C)N
PRC]JECT INDIRNA AVE NAME DAVE BERT0 pA'fE 01-Ju1-97
L]RAiNAGE ETEMS UN67S QIJA'NTITY PFiICE G05T
1) Dryweil - Type A @ 1(}°/0 EA 16 125000 3250.00
2} Orywe11- Typ$ B EA 1550 00 00[}
3} Grate - Type I @ ia% FA 1.5 1510.00 225.00
4) Grate Type 2@ 10% EA 06 150.00 90.00 ,
5) iGrate -Type 3@ 10°An EA 03 15a.00 4500
BJ Grate - Type 4@ 10"/a EA 2.2 2[3000 440.00
7) Backfiil For Dryweu @ 10% cY 78 , 16.00 1248.00
8} Metal FramB Type 1@ 10°/0 EA 1.9 150 00 2$5.00
9} fUfetal Frame Type 2@ 10% EA 0.3 15[1.00 45.[1[3
10) Metal Frarrae Type 4 si 117°r5 Ep 26 150.00 39000
11) Light Lovse Riprap @ 1(]% CY 0.72 22.(10 15 84
12) PVC Pipe 12°' C7ia @ 10% tF 239'6 1600 383360
13] PVC Pipe 15" t}ia. @ 10% LF 717 18.00 129060
14} PVC Pipe 18" Dia @ 10% LF 21 21.04 441.00
15]PVC F'ipe 24" Dia @ 10g6 LF 156 26.00 40560
16] Spokane County Cetch Basin Type 1 @ 20% EA 46 800A0 368000
17] Solid fid @ 1 Q°h EA 0.4 310 flC1 12400
18) 208 Swa(e ExacaVabon @ 60% CY 532.32 600 425$.56
99) Fme Grading Far 209 5wale @ 100°r6 CY 20007 8 1.10 22008.58
24} Hydroseeding @ 1 Da°Jo SF 178806 007 1251642
fVC]N S7AN❑ARD ORAINAGE ITEMS
1] Filter Fabric Lining Fvr 26 D W. c"t1 10% LS 260.00
2) ❑.0(3 • , ,
3} 000
4) 0,00
pRAIhfAGE 5UB7c]TAL 54852.20
21) Monuments EA 18500 0 00
22) 8amcade @ 100% LF 204 33 00 660000
23] 5treet Sfgns F-A 8500 0 04
QTHER SllBTOTAL 6600 (td
GRApING, SURFACING, Gi1RB, AND SlOEWALkC
24] Rough Grade § 10% e4 ` ' e ' • • CY ' 354013 • 5.00 17744.65 • •F
25] Top Course @ 1I7°r6 CY 508.88 1600 8110.08
26) Base Course @ ip"A CY 886 24 1600 14179.84
27J Anphalt Gancrete C 20% Tans 4958.38 4+4.40 784643.27
28} Curh Type A LF 7.00 0.00
29) Curb Type B @ 15°r6 LP 336252 800 26900.16
30) Curb Type R LF &.00 004
31] 5idewalk @ 35% 5Q YD 3298 915 1670 54924 88
NON-STRIVDARC] ROAC] fTEMS
1) Canstructan Of Vadosrs 7um Island & Planfing Strip °ib 27200 0t7
2) 5aw Gut Ansl Remor►al L76 Asphalt & Cnnc Cur6 tQ A2$ LS 1000.00
3} Lane Siriping @ 20°lo LS 1904.00
GRADING AND SURFa4GING 33650288
C9NSTRRJCTlOR1 T❑TAL 397.95508
3RD BQNQ REPLJCTIOIV
~
PRQJECT INDIANA RVE NAME DAVE 6ERT0 DATE 01-Ju1-97
QRAINAGE ITEMS UAfITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1} Drywell -Type A@ 10°I6 F~4 2.8 1250.00 325000
2) DrywelY - Type 8 EA 1560.00 0.00
3) Grate - Type 1@ 1{1°r5 EA 1.5 150.00 22500
4) Grate Type 3@ 10°k EA 06 15000 9000
5] Grate -`Cype 3@ 10% EA 03 950,00 4500
fij Grate - Type 4@ 14°r5 EA 7.2 20000 440.00
7) Backfill For Dryweli @ tfl% CY 78 16U0 1248.00
8) Medal Frame Type 1 c,D 10°/0 €A 19 150 00 285.00
9) Metal Frame Type 2@ 10% E4 03 150 00 4500
10} Metal Frarne Type 4@ 1[}% EA 26 150 00 39[}.00
11) Light Loase Riprap @ 10°fa CY 0 72 2200 15.84
12} P1AC Pipe 12" Dia d7 10% LF 2396 1600 383160
13} PVC Pipe 15" Dia [~,i 10°14 LF 71.7 98 00 128160
14} PVC Ptlpe 18" Dia @ 113% LF 21 21 00 441 00
15}PVC Pipe 24" []ia @ 10°1o LF 156 26.00 4[}5.80
16) Spakane County Catch Basin T+ype 1@ 20% EA 46 80000 3680 Oa
17) S41id lid @ 1 0°!o- EA 04 31000 124 00
1$} 208 Swale Exacavation @ 60°lu CY 53Z32 80{] 4258.56
99) Fine Grading For 208 Swale @ 100% CY 20007 8 110 22008.58
20} Hydrvseedmg @ 900% SF 978806 4 07 12515 42
IVDN STAND,ARD QFiA1hRG'E ITEMS
1) Filter Fabric Lirnng Fvr 26 ❑ W. @ 10°rb LS 260.00
2) 000
s, 0.00
ay 0.00
[3RAINAGE SUBTaTAL 54852 20
21} Morauments EA 18500 000
22) Bamcade @ 100% LF 240 3300 660000
23} Street Signs EA 8500 000
- - -
aTHER SUBTO7AL 6800.00
GRAC]ING, SURFACING, CURB, RND SIREWALK
24} Rough Grsde @ 10% CY 3540 13 500 17740.65
25) Tvp Cvurse @ 10% CY 50688 1600 8110.08
26} Base Course @ 10QA CY 886 24 16.00 14179.$4
27} Asphaft Concrete @ 20% Tons 4156 38 44 40 184543.27
2$) Curh Type A LF 7.00 000
29) Curb Type B@ 15% tF 336252 8.00 25900 16
30] Curb Type R LF 800 000
31} 5idewalk @ 35% SQ Yp 3288 915 16 70 5492488
NON-STANDARD RvAC] ITEMS
1) Constr-ucban df Vanous Tum Island &Planbng Sfip %-k'C 27200.00
2} 5awr Cut And RemaVal C77f Asphalt & C4nC Curb @ J~y CI(ILS 1000.00
3} Lane ftping @ 20% L5 19{}4.00
GRAOING ANp SURFACING 335502 8$
GOIVSTRUCTION TOTAL 397,95508
t' s -.~a~' OFFIGE OF
SPQkANE CO[7NTY ElVGINEER
` :t AVOIDVERBaLORDERS
T[1~ QATE
~,f
FR0~1 5~18 ~T
~
~ ~
2NC] B(7NQ REG}L9CTIQN
PROJEC7 INQIANf1 AVE fUAME DAVE BER7`O DA7E 22-May97
t]FtAIN.JiGE lTEMS UIVlTS QLFANTiTY FftiCE COST
1} C?ryweR -TyR7e A @ 10% EA 26 125000 3250 00
2} aryweR - Type 6 ER 156000 000
3) Grate - Type 1@ 10% EA 15 154.04 225.00
4} Grate Type 2@ 10°,b EA 06 150,00 9000
5} !GratE - jype 3@ 10°/o EA 0.3 15000 4500
6) Gvafe - Type 4@ 10°r5 EA 22 zoa ao 44000
7) BaclsTii6 Far Drywen @ id% CY 78 1600 1248.00
8] Metal Frame Type 9@ 10% EA 1 9 150.00 28500
9} MetaC Frame Type Z@ 10% EA 03 150.00 45.0[]
10] Metal Frame Type 4 @ 10°1n EA 26 15000 39000
11} Light Loose RiQrap @ 10°,6 CY 072 2200 15 84
12] PVC Pipe 17°t.l'ra. @ 10% LF 2396 16.00 383164
13) PVC Pipe 15" C3ia. @ 00° LF 71 7 1800 1290.E0
14) P1/G Pipe 1 B" Dia @ 1 d°fQ LF 21 21 00 441 [}47
15}PVC Pipe 24" Di2r. @ 1i1°/a ~ LF 15 fi 2600 405 66
16J Spakane Caunty Catch 8asin 7ype 1@ 20% E4 46 80000 3680.00
17) Salid lid @ 10°la EA 0.4 310.00 12400
18) 208 5wafe Exacavadvn @ 100°Ia &Q 1 CY 8872 800 ' 1097.60
19) Fine Grading For 248 Swaie ,d1 100% CY 200078 1,10 2200858
2fl) Hydeoseedirsg @ 100% SF 478906 0.07 12516.42
NDN STAAlCPARD QRAINAGE 1TEMS
i) Fifter Fabcic Lining For 26 D W. @ ta% LS 26000
a) , . . 000 3) 0.00
qy 0.00
pRAINAGE 54JBTOTAL. 57691 24
243 Manurnents Ef4 18500 0010
221 Barricade @ 1(]0% LF 200 3300 5640,00
23) Street 5igns EA 8500 000
DTHER SUB7OTAL 660000
GRADING, SURFACING, CLJRB, RNIJ SIDEWALK
.
za) Rougr, GTa~e (g za9/6 jb X, cv 7096.26 5.00 35481.30
25) Tap Course @ 50% '0% CY 2534.4 18 00 4055040
26] Base Cnurse C 50°fa 1070 CY 4431.2 1600 70899 24
27) Asphalt Concrete @ 50°~ ~70 Tans 10390.95 44.40 46135818
28) Curb Type A LF 700 0 40
29) Curb 7ype 9 @ 30% 157'o LF 5725.04 8.00 5380032
30) Curb Type R LF 800 0y00
31) Sidewa[k @74°r6 j5'~'~ SQ lD 6:577.83 1610 109849.78
iVON-STANDARD R{)AD ITEMS
1) Constructiarr Df Various Turn fsfand & Planbng Strip 4b70%LSfW%, 43604.00
2) Saw Cut And Removal OiAsphaft & Cana Cueb @ 5b%LS ,tOyo 500000
3) Lane 5triping @ 70% Z.,p y, LS . 666400
GRAI7ING WVa SURF'ACING 831243.16
CONS1fRUCT10N TC]TAL 895,49440
.,JNT3 REDUCTION
PRf7JECT I(VL7IANA AVE NAME DAVE 8ER3O OATE 01-Jul-97
QRAINAGE ETEMS L11VIT5 ❑UANTITY PRICE C057
1) prywell - Type A@ 10% EA 2.8 125[}.00 325000
2) Drrywell - Type B EA 156000 0,00
3) Grake - Type 4@ 14°/0 Ea°+ 1 5 150 00 22500
4} Gra#e Type 2 ED a 0° EA 06 15000 90.(]4 , .
5) Iarate - Type 3@ 10°Io EA 03 15000 45.00
6] Grate - Type d @ 1 0°,6 EA 22 20000 440.00
7] 8ackf:ll Fcar Qrywelt @ 10°h CY 78 16flQ 7248 00
8) Metal Frame Type a cGD iQ°lq E,A 1,9 15000 285.0[]
9) Metal Frarne T}+pe 2@ 10°1~ EA 03 154.00 45 00
10) Metal Fcame Type 4 @ 10% EA 26 150.00 39000
11) Light Loase Riprap rLD 7 0% CY 0 72 22.00 16.84
72) PVG Pape 12" Dia. @ 'VU% LF 239.6 16.00 3833.50
13) F'VC Pipe 15" Dia. c~,L 1(7°v'o LF 717 18.00 1290 60
14) PVC F'ipe 18" Dia Q 14% LF 21 21.00 44100
15)PVC Pipe 24" dia. G SO% LF 15.8 26,130 40560
16] Spakane Caunty Catch 6asin Type 1 ~,-2&A I076 EA 46 80000 3684 00
17) Safid lid @ f G°/o F.A 04 31000 124 40
18} 2G8 Swaie Exacavation @fi63'a 10% CY 532.32 8.00 4258.58
19} Fine Grading Far 2U8 5wafe @ "936 197o CY 20007 8 1 10 2200858
20} Hydraseeding @ 490% JCJYa SF 1788[}6 007 72516.42
NON STANOARD C]RAlNNGE ITEMS
1) Filter Fabric Lining FQr 25 D.W. @ 10% LS 260.00
2} 0.00
3) Q.Oa
qy 000
DRAIiVAGE SU9TOTAL 54852.20
21) Monumerrts EA 18500 0 00
22) Barrscade @-4BB°i6 107 LF 200 33A0 6600.00
23} Street Signs EA 85,00 0.04
UTHER SUBTOZAL 6600.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CLiRB, AN❑ SIpE1AlALK
24) Raugh Grade @ 14% CY 3540.13 500 17740 85
25) Top Covrse @ 1(3°r5 C'c' 50688 16.00 8110,08
26} Base Course @ 10°Jo CY 88624 1600 14179.84
27} Asphaft Cancrete @ -28% 1070 1'sans 4156.38 44.40 i 84543 27
28) Cur6 Type A LF 7.00 0,00
29] Curb Type 6Q 46+}6 E d7. LF 336252 800 26900.16
30} Gurb Type i4 LF 800 0.00
39} Sidewalk @ 3" 10`4 SQ Y❑ 3288.915 96 74 54524.88
IVOiV-5TANDARC] RDA[] ITEMS
1) Canstruc3iAn Qi Varivus Tum Island ~ Planbng Stnp °i5~ 7c, 27200.00
2} Saw Cut And Remaval C]f Asphalt & Conc Cur6 @ gvLs 1000.04 ,
3} Lane Striping @ ,2Q4fr fc7I7: LS 1904.00
GRADING AND SURFACIIYG 336502.88
G[3NSTRUC71C]N TOTAL 397,955.08
4TH BOND REDUCTION
PROJECT INDIANA AVE NAME DAVE BERTO DATE 16-Ju1-97
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A cLD 10% EA 2.6 1250.00 3250.00
2) Drywell - Type B EA 1560.00 0.00
3) Grate - Type 1@ 10% EA 1.5 150.00 225.00
4) Grate Type 2@ 10% EA 0.6 150.00 90.00
5) Grate - Type 3@ 10% EA 03 150.00 45.00
6) Grate - Type 4@ 10% EA 22 200 00 440.00
7) Backfill For Drywell @ 10% CY 78 16.00 1248.00
8) Metal Frame Type 1@ 10°r6 EA 1.9 150 00 285.00
9) Metal Frame Type 2@ 10% EA 03 150.00 45.00
10) Metal Frame Type 4@ 10°rG EA 2.6 150.00 390.00
11) Light Loose Riprap @ 10°r6 CY 0.72 22.00 15 84
12) PVC Pipe 12" Dia. @ 10% LF 2396 16.00 3833.60
13) PVC Pipe 15" Dia. @ 10% LF 71.7 18.00 1290.60
14) PVC Pipe 18" Dia @ 10% LF 21 21.00 441.00
15)PVC Pipe 24" Dia @ 10% LF 15.6 26 00 405.60
16) Spokane County Catch Basin Type 1~ 10% EA 2.3 800.00 1840.00
17) Solid lid @ 10% EA 0.4 310.00 124.00
18) 208 Swale ExacavaUon @ 10% CY 88.72 8.00 709.76
19) Fine Grading For 208 Swale @ 10% CY 2000.78 1 10 2200.86
20) Hydroseeding @ 10% SF 178806 0.07 1251 64
NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
1) Filter Fabric Lining For 26 D W@ 10% LS 260.00
2) 0.00
3) 0.00
4) 0.00
DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 18390.90
21) Monuments EA 185.00 0 00
22) Bamcade @ 10% LF 20 33 00 660.00
23) Street Signs EA 85 00 0.00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 660.00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK
24) Rough Grade @ 10% CY 3548 13 5.00 17740.65
25) Top Course @ 10% CY 506 88 16.00 8110.08
26) Base Course @ 10% CY 886 24 16.00 14179.84
27) Asphalt Concrete @ 10% Tons 2078 19 44.40 92271 64
28) Curb Type A LF 7 00 0 00
29) Curb Type B@ 10% LF 2241.68 8 00 17933.44
30) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0 00
31) Sidewalk @ 10% SQ YD 939.69 16.70 15692 82 I
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS I
1) Construction Of Various Tum Island & Planting Strip % L 6800 00
2) Saw Cut And Removal Of Asphalt & Conc Curb @ LS 1000 00
3) Lane Stripmg @ 10% LS 952 00
GRADING AND SURFACING 174680 47
CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 193,731.37
RESULUTIQN NO. S„'
BEFDRE THE BDARD OF CC]UNTY CONFINI551ONERS OF SPOKAIVE COllN'FY, VdA5H1NGTON
IN THE MATTER DF ESTABE.ISHMEN7'
C]F iNDIANA AVEi+f []E ) R E 5 U L U ' ' T Q N -
C C ] [ ] N T Y ENGIN'EEk'S RdAd7 FILE N0. 2624 ) E S T A B L I S H M E N T
No Assessor'S Tax Parcel 1<iumber Asstgned - Public Raadways
This being the day set far the hearing on Spokane Counry Engineer's Report on the propased
estabizshanent og M1AryA AVEN[]E, proceedings foe which were initiated by PRELIMINARY
R'E$ULUTIUN NU. 98-0043, and it agpearing to the Baard on proof duly made that Natice of Hearing was
puhlished and posted m the manner atd for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the reporc and
maps af the Spokane Caunty Engineer and all claims and papers an file and aftee heanng all other evidence
adduced at the hearing; and
1T FURTHER APPEARING that the righEs ❑f way have been dedicated as gublic rnad, variable evidih,
and that said road is a public necessity and the same should bc opened and established as County road.
THEREFDRE BE IT FLES{7LVED my the Baard of Caunty Commissianers ❑f Spokane Cvunty,
Washington, that the hereinafter described road as eepor[ed by [he 5pakane County Engineer vn the 3rd day o[
February. 1998, being more particularly described as follvws.
IIVDTANA, AVEMLIE - Variatale width rEght of ratay, fram the existing Indiana AVCnue at the easc
fine ❑F the Souttrwest Quarler of Secttan Ifl, Townstiip 25 North, Rangc 44 E W.M easterly to
the west line oF Sullivan Raad at the east line af Sechon 14, Township 25 North, Range 44
E VN.M. as shown vn plans on fife in the CJffice af the Gflunry Engineer ForSuZlivan Park Center
and F3inding Site Plan 48-96 and rdglit of way plan for Indiana ANenue dated Nor+ember 24, 1997
and approved by the Couney Engineer an 17ecember 15, 1997
and as shown by the recvrds and maps on file in the Offce of the 5pokane Caunry Engineer be and the same
hereby is esiahlished as Counry road and the sarr:e shall be known as JNllIANA AVENLTE, Itoad Fi[e No. 26~4
The raad supervisot' af the road descrfiet rn which the said road ts located is hereby direc[ed ta open and maintain
the same far public use and travel "
APFROVED BY TN~ r`n, 1 da,af February, 1998.
c• ~
~ `'f~, S(~A~tD C7F COUNTY COMM15SfQNERS
p4 , DP SPDKANE COUNTY, WASHIN~aTC}N
0
n
~ :s~ •
~c~~~'r'~• ~ p. ~~Rrs, cMnru AT"fES`~': WILLiAM E. d0~l~i ,d
CLE1~K pF ~HE BC]ARD
M KATE Mc~,ASLIIV, VICE-CHAIR
By~
~ o~gu~rv ~
~
?JROSKELLEY
.
s
oFFIcE oF
5P4KANE COUIYTY EIVGiNEER
AVOTaVERBALORDERS
TO Y DATE
~
FRDMq SiJBJ ~T~e~
~ _
s. 3 , r,► : • s0050$0255 vat. 1109racE ~ 409
SApKAtdi CQUNTY SEb1EitA{°iE
~ pEVpLOPER CONtvECTION AGREEMEI+(7 ,3,' -
` CoP71C7fJ t1T
TNlS AGREEMEAlT, rnade and entered InCO this 4day af Alorji
1990' by and beeween Spakane Cauntyr a poltttcai sudivlilon af the State of
wasi ngtan„ having vfflce5 far the trensaetl+an of 6usfnass at Waat 1176 9road-
way Avenue, Spakane, Washfrtgsnnp 99260, hareinaf[er raterrr3d ta a3 the
"County", enG R.A_ H?nsaa CamflanV._[nr , haVing Offiees ar
• reSPdlnq at P.C. gqx 1400 i , kashin4tnn e~
hereina(ter referred lo as ttte '"DCVeit~peY"a J~v! tly referred to as [tae 'Par[les°e -
SNt'T'NE SSEr3"H:
NVNEREAS, pursuant to the pravlsPona of the Aevlaed Cada cf SYashinglan,
5ecti4n 36.32.120(6), the 8oard of Cns+nty Cmmmiss(aners af Spakans Covnty
has the care ❑I Gounty praperty and ttts mena$emenC of County funids anH
6u3lne3s; and
1Y}lEREAS, pursuant to the pravfslons at Chapter 36.54 RGW, 5pakane
County has the ab111ty tp cnnstruCt, nperate and malntatn a system of"sewerage
wethtn Spokane Caunty constatent wlth the adopFed Comprehensive Wasiawater
hfanagement Adaa; ahd '
WNEREdIS, the Develapar herefna6a+ve fs the owner ❑f that partel af prop-
erty more par[lcularly descrtbed In Attaehment "A°, attacfied hetato and Intpr-
porated herefn by reference, haretnalter referred as "Property", and deslres to
connect the use(s) an svch Prapariy Co the County's sewargge systemi and
IYHEREAS, the Caunty is agrceeble ta allowing the Developer te cannect
the use(s) qn the Property ta the Courtty's seweraee spstem, subjecC to certaln
conditlons, dncluding 1n part the Devaloper paytng all casts a5sacdated wlth such
cannectian, aa weli as the 4eveloper agreeing that the "spectal 6anefl[s" acrrv-
ing to the properiies as a resuli of the connet[!an 4a the Cc7unty'S sewerage
system at the present time will estabitah Chs. "speclal heneflts" aecruing to the
Property if a Ut{lily Laca! lmprovement ❑Istrtct, pursuant tn Chap[er 35,94
RCsV, Is tarmed and includes such Praperty; ~
NOtV, TMEREFaRE, for and In con5tderatfon af the mutvat prortilyes set
forth hereinaiter, the Partfes heretc drs rnutually agree as (oliows: . ir ~
SECTIC7N 1. 7he Oeveloper Is des(raus ot connecting the Rrapcr[y to the County's •
sawerage system tnrauqh a sanltary sawar system, harelnafter referred ta as ' -
the "Faefllty".
- ft Is the Intent ef thla Agreement Fa reduce ta writing the Parties agree-
- ment with respect ta the deslgn, conS4Yuet(oR, ownershlp and Cullfrot a[ the Faeiil[yo as welf as rgfaied matters. '.•4~ i
sEcriaM z. . ~
The Partdes agree the[ the faflowtng preulsfnns ahaif contrat the daslgn,
censtructlan and ownershlp af the Fecffity descrtbed in 5eC[lan 7 of thfs Agree-
ment. The Gaunty wilt nn[ own the Faeility whlch !s deslgned and canstruc[ed by
, the Develaper under the terrtts ❑t thps Agreemeni. 9ecause the County wltl nat
be the owner of the Facfiity, the Caunty may not par¢lclpatc Irr the cost of the
rlesrgn and/or cvnstruct+vn al the FacfIICy irom It nP i% lacad sales tax moneys
under Spokxna Ceunty Resolution Nn. 84-1070, as amended. Additianatly, as
the Gounty ds nat the owner af the Faclffty, the Gaunky wlll nat lnclude svsh
Faaflty in any (uture t1L9O or allnw any ather praperty uwner ar user tn tap •
rntn or ta use the Fac[li[y as deslgned artd canstructed by the pevelaper here-
In Likewlse, the Deveioper may not aV3ow ur permit any cther ¢roperty awner
ior vser to tap lnco ar use the FactlEty refer°_ncEd t7BPBIt10170V2 under any eor ~
cu(mstancas wha[sorver,
- 1
~ i
r
t
, ,
.
.I ~ • _ ' "
. . . . _ ~ . r.. . . -
- 4 ` Y4l 1109nGE~4ll
YDI. 1109PbGf t4lo
SECTIUN 7. Prinr ta the rSeslgn or the canstrurtion of the Faclllty, the Davelvper sMafl
hla modlficatfon o~ er amendment to thls Agreement shafl be t~alld untll the su6mlt ta the Spakane Cvunty UtllFties Olrector detalled plana and spedfI[aLkons
prepared by a]Icertaed englneer. Such pGans and specllEeatians must 6e in the
same Is reduced to writing and executed wlih the same Tarmaf[[9es as th!s ' torm and con[eni as prescrihed Gy the Spokane County lftlll[ies plreetor priar
Rgreement. . ' , rr'. Ln the commeneement af any cons[ruc[Inn 7he Spakane Cnunty Ut1SI[les 41ree-
tor may, at his sole csiscretivn, waide the requirement for plans and speclflca-
5ECTlQH 8. [ions The design and construetfan af such Facllity shall be lr§ aecardance wlth
7his Agreemerst has and shall be construed es hav[ng been made and a11 ap¢IEeable federal, 5taie, la[al and Cnunty regulat4ons,
delivered ln the Stete vf Washingtonf and the Qaws of the State oT Weshington 6juring the [onstruetian of the FaciIICy, the Caun[y Llkflltics Dlrectnr or hl3
slnull he appllca6le to Its cnnstructlon and enlorcement. Any aztien e[ 6aw, sult duly authorized represen4atlve shall have the rlght tv make reasana6le Inspec-
rn equlty, or Judiclal prfleeeding far the enTorcemen[ o[ Yhls Agreement or any tions of avch Facility ta determine that It Is cvnssructed In accQrdance wl[h the
pravlsian herebf shsll be Instltuted vnly yn the Gpuris of competent Jvrtsdlcilan approved plans end spaclilcsYlons, as we11 as all apPllemble federel, st&te and
within Spokane County~ washingaon. • . , , ~-µar-;.' iocal laws, ordinances and regula4lons. 7he ❑evelaper agrees ta stop all cen-
' :~i- , ssructien IS the Cnunty Lltllltles DIreeCar ar h!s puly sutharized representative,
SECT1pN 9. , at tnefr soie dlscreGon, determlne that the Facfllxy Is not heing constructed in
aecordanca wfth the approded plans and speclflcaTinns. The County shall not
A41 3erdice5 ta be rendered or performed under Lhls Agreement by the • bp liable in such lnstance far AkY }nereased ensts pr damages dae [o the stop-
Developer wtlS 6e rendered Dr perfnrmed entlreiy a4 the 1]eveloper'x own rlsEc pege SuCh insgec[inn, hpweveP, shaEl net rellRVe the Deveiaper from Fnsuring
and te DeVC1nper expressly aprees to Irsdernnify and hold hermless Spokane hiniselt thsat [hu Fnclllty Is ❑eing CnnsiruetQd canslgtent wSth the eppllssbin laws
Caunty and alt or iSs offlcers, aqents, cmplnyeas 9r othcrwlsn from any and all nnd upprovcd plans and spccEflcaYlons. Tlw f]oveloper ahall bc reaponsSGlc rvr
liabfllty, loss vr damage tha[ Spokane Covnty end any af Ita offlcers, agen4s, reimbursing Spo'kane County far a11 pests Incurred 6y the Ccunty In making
empkoyees or otherwlse may surfer as a result af claims, demansfs, 8C[IGl14, such inspecttons. 5vch expenses shall Include, but nat be EImILed Lo, wages
damages er In]uries nf every klnd vr nature whaisoever 6y vr to arsy and a!I and iravel. Such esspenses shall 6e blfled 4y the Gaunty and pald 6y the
persorss or groperty vr judgment agalnst the Cvunty, and any of ]ts officers, Dc+eeloper prlor to the County'S acceptance cf the Feelllty for usaQe pf the . '
agents, employees or otherwlse which resWt irom, arlse out of, or are 1n any County's sewerage system, ' i
svay cannec4ed with the v6llgatlons [o be rendered or perTormad Isy the Devel-
aper under the terms af thls Agreement. - _ = SECTIOFf 3,
SECTI{]N 10, , upon completlon of the construeffen af the Faclllty and accep[ance nf the
Facllity 6y the Spokane Caun[y lJtilftles 61rec[pr, sueh Fatilfty shall be alfvwed
ail nntlces cafled for ar provided fnr ]n this Agreement shaIl bc fn wrlting • to use the Counxy's sewerage faGll#ties. The ❑evelaper aeknnwledges that he
and must 6e served un any ot the Par[tes clihar personally or by eertlfle8 mall, will have ta pay the General Fa[Illty Charge (G1FC) as adnp[ed by the Cuunty,
return recelpt requesSed, seni to the Partles at their respeetlve addresses fvr the uses (included change in use) an the praperLies descrl6ed herelnabove,
herelnaAove glven. Not1c8 5ent by eer[lfled mall shall be deemed served when ~ wiihln that llme Irame provlded by the GFC adapting ordlnance, as well ss the
depwf;ed In the Unlted Sta[es mall, postage prepald. : es[abllshed monthly malntenanre and aperatlon charge In sueh amoun4 and wlthln
' that time frame requ]red wfthlrv the adaptfng ordlnance, - '
SECTIflN 11 ~
. .'i
. '
7his Agrecment con[ains a[I the terms and col5ditlans agreed upon 6y the sEcrioN a
'
Partles. No other understandings, aral ar otharwfse, regarding the subJe=[ No peraorr, Tlrm or corpuration, exce,pt the peveloper and [hose persons
matter a► thls Agreemenl sha11 be deemed to exlst or to trind any ❑r the Farsles wha may hereufter acquEre the AroperEy or thelr helrs, sueeessors vr asslgns,,
hereEa. The 4]evefoper has read and vnrSerstands fAls hgreemeni, and now shall be permlCied pr- eu4harfted [o fap Inta ar ta use the Facllity wi[Fanut the
sta[es [hat no representa[Son, promise, ur agreetnent not expressed In thla _ express wrltten runsent of the Cvunty.
A$reemant has 6een made to Induce the Developar ta execuse the same.
5EC710N 12. • _ SECTIDN 5.
7he ParSics recogniae [hat the Aroperty wiSl 6e "speclafly benefited" ay
Ril prowslans oF this pgreement shal3 run wlth the Property deserPbed ln the CoUnYy alVowing such Rraperty to connee[ to the Gdun[y sewerage sysiem
Attachmen4 "A". Thls Agreement shall 6e recorded by the Ceunty uppn estacu- under the terms af this A reemeni. The Aartles accordlrpgky agree Lhat 4n
[Ion by eEl Partles, ln the Spnkane Caunty Auditor'S Oiftee, , determining °spacial benefit s aecruing ta the Property, when and if a Utillty
- Local Improvement ❑lstrict is formed pvrsuant to elther the pe[Ition or resolu-
SEC710N 13. llan methnds su[horixed In Chapter 36.99 FtCW ar any o[her lawful meshed
presencly exlsting nr hereaf[er proVided }or 4y the Washingten 5[ate leglsla-
7he Qevelnper agress ihat En the event a ilL1O ls fprmed, as prpvlded For Zure, whl[h ULIC3 Includex alf nr a portfon of sald Araperty, that the "special
In Chapter 36 44 RCt+r, hy the peIIitlan method, and such LILID includes all or a beneflts" accruEng to such proAertdes at the [Ime nr the formatlorr of the ULID
pprtlpn af the Praperty, the Coun[y shall have the rlghi to add the slgrsature will 6e based uppn the baneSlis a[cruing Sa such Arpperty a[ the tlme the
af the pevelaper or hls sueeessors ln la[erest to such Property ta wch petltion Covniy allows the Develaper lo vse the County's sewerage facdlltles as provlded
in auppor[ of the crea[lon af the lltlp, Eis 6aundaries and proposed ImpraVe• for in Sec[Von 3 af t1i15 Agreement, as a resutt al allewing the Praperty ie
meni for that portlon of the Prapeeiy Included wlxYrln the boundaries ot the cennect to the Coun[y's sewerage sysxem.
Lat10, The Develnper shall retaln ths rlght ta pm;est the assessment on the
~ aroperty as prpvlded for in FtCW 36.94.250 ef seq. $EC710N fi.
The Devaloper further agreas that ln the event a ULIf7 Is formed, as E3oth Partles agrec to specitYcally ohserve all federal, sta[e and Voeal laws,
prvvided far In Chapter 36 94 RCW, 6y the resvlutlan methnd, and such ULiti ordinances and regulatians t❑ the ex[ent that they may have any bearing upon
inc9udes a11 ar a pprti9n of the Property, the bevelnper and hls successgrs in elther party in parformlrsg thelr respecilve obligations under the Lerms af thls
~ interest ta the Praperty shall forfeEt ihelr rlght in flte a protesC wI[h the Clerk Agreement, THe Daveloper w914 haVe Co ohtaln a permlt irom the Caunty Engi-
of the Bbard of Caunty Commissioners as pmvided for In RCW 36.94.240, ah- neer'S D{fEce to Construc[ the Facltlt In the Cflunt 's rl hts-of-wa A sewar
Jecting to the formatibn nt the L7Lfb nr fts praposed boundarles or pr~posed 1' Y 9 Y•
Imp~o~emen[s H(awe~eri the De~elaper shal! retaln the rlg~t to pratest the , canneeioon permit is also requtred when tvnnecting homes ar pulfdings to any
assessmen[ en the Property a5 prpvlded fnr in kCW 36.94,254 et seq. Caun[y serrer Ilne. ThFs iisting af permlts ls nat Intended tv t~e all Incluslve,
, . vaL. 1109Pes€1913 y • . , - ,
' • _ _ ' _ - _:,f ~'a_ ~ , ' . - ; YOI.~~.~.~~~',hGE~4~~:~~: '
ATTACHMEld7 "A" _ . . . . , ~ _ , .
, , • ' . Ji~ SECTRORI 14, .
' • , The Caunty agrees that ence the Faelflty deserlbed hereSn Is Evnstructed
• , ' and accepted ❑y the Couniy L1tFfltles 4lrectori the County wlll malnEaln the
- . r °Gencral Facflltles" that exlst wlt#sln the Caunty rlgh4s-af•way and easements
urrder the soretrvl af the Caunty, "Ceniral Faellltles", for the purpose ar 4hls
LEGAl. (fESCR1PT4DH; settivn, shall mean coHcetvr, ma}n and Trvnk lines elght Inehes (8") ln dlame4er
anrr larger, Tha Ceveioper shalF inalntaln aI{ ~Fac►Ils€es regardlass o1 whether
~QjS~ and 2¢ Rtnr~r~T_ ~~~~q~„ga,pyk 7. Sii7y~uan~acSr . they are withirr the Cvunty rlghts-oF-way ar not, whleh tonnect the pra,pert3es
Cen aC[cirding tg p7at re[orded in Vulume 19 qf P1atS.., deserlhed herelrs ❑r bvildings ihareon wlth the [SR[PaI Fae[Iltlea.
Pages 25 and 26. in Spokane Cnuntp, 11as9s1ngtnn
, • ' • ' ' . . ~ x~`:.' iR! WITFlESS 4VhtEREC3F, the Partlas haue uSed lhls Agreement ta he ° • ~ execueed an the dey and year herelnabobg set [prt
PARCEE NO: 9vriipn of Parcel IioS. 4511~9.9031; 45113.9026; and 45141.9170 - BCsqRQ D CCIUH~FY GDMMrSSI@NERS
Plat iS in pnogress and n~ parcel numhers t+ill De assigned. - - AF""/~POKA E Cf,3l~y~' WASHIAlGTpN
i i ~'4 ••~1FiT ~f~ Jt
USE •
.,•Shopping cenier end/nr other mlxed-use eonmercial develapment' t
ApQRf55. - - '
ndt yet knCwn
, . ' aT7E5T:
• . 5 WIILI E. QM~41iUE,
CEIICRAC FAC1L]71E5 CHARGE: ' Clerk af e Hoard
7he sctual General F'acilities CTrarge peyable shall he that ' ~yp ~
amqunt wh9eh is applitahle as esta6155hed by CounCy Brdfnen[e l~eguly Cierk
or ReSS1uC1pn, es amended ar reviSed.
~~VEL,OPER: R.~aasnn Co~atn~y. Snc.
_6 iFiC td,fZ4t
, R.A. 41anson
, _ - ` - - ~ ?rPeib^r " ~i'ICfe) - - . . •7 _ . _ , i • _ • .
' - . . _ - ~ ,r , . , ;'G• . .
• . . - ,
. fiTql F. [!F WA5Ii1NC7 ON 5TA9'f; pF WA511[H6YOIt ]i
GOl1N7Y CL]VNgY QF..._ _$Aa1t8nC_
(5n ihia sln}° lxrrsnnaliy .ppe.rrcl helnra mr
❑n thla dnr nf ..a __A9r 1.].._e.. . l4..~.Q _
6`fnre mv. lhe unJerOynrA, .►dRIwyr [•vWyc In a~Ml for elw Sfol. oi
mvr[NED , . _ .
n,i y~m„ Inyinn Culy roinmlrsiannl
P4LC~ 01 t end aaorn. qc~mrs~llr nnneircvl
n k0 6r ilir Indiriduai de, t.drd in and
a1~ r•rrusrel sl,e wii>un rnA ferrFn3nF ir~~rumrnt, -
end ncknuwlydrrd ihns . a3~n~~y lhr ~-r en rnr kna.n ia ha lhr Pre~ise~i~ [cfsf[.k,ic,r3exfixtg6e~e~,g,cX
Irrr and rslvnGnrr or; end derd. xeer[qet7tis~xx91 R. P. lIdflio[A ~.Gfq~ifllaS". 11t~.._m
inr Iti, uyra ond purifosc, l}~rrrln mei~l4oned. ili~ snrIq-rnlf-ul [6at rxri uled i!v 1nrrJ4=•ina inslnunetit, onsl ecknovlyd~rd
'9r•li~~ f 1~ Il+a eaiE Imlrcinirnt ln Ik lhe Irre onrl wluniary .el ond dred ni Esid ereipon
y~'' ~ lw !ur lhW usee .nd piirpnir1 IIsEilIn riPM1IlphFd. ond OA noZR clateJ Liul
~L. f 5 nuthoe-aed lo s.cevle llw eaSd 1naEr~unrnl snd lhst Ihe ke.l
r~F~Kl~,:. C{7UI!'[T.1Yk5i , .
GINEN under mr hend .nd offiriel cel 11,1i aff~i:rd ii ~I.~ cnrvarair. 1 of raw mrpr•ruEfnn.
r SM1MPSC3N d.y uf 19.. 1lylnr.s my h nd rid I rlo If9aed 11-, dey ie~d yrs• liiot
• , , a4ar~ writisn
" ' ~+¢Q' ~ Nriar+ I'x~4f~~ En and f~r tP~e 5~r1. af FNoe1. 6.s ~
^Nasnrr !'uldit In aaal foa ihe 5ia1n of lYsst~ln=~c~
Q3 ~~nciun rr~~d.nc nt.._.,.. rri IJincal-- . 5RA~R£.._.r....,w.._.-.«..,.»._.~
a ~
r `1
!
!
4 • ~rwl l+•il ~1feh~n Ipe ttEOro1~5 V5C
i°r;vyl fus JI.,.wd -i l!^'iuwt al . TICQLI jt' f_E
111LiY" ~ • '
3~7 r . ? l'I.RR
Sf•Crr}~ ~ ~1~~T+*":M. -
t '
S y
n:_ Qo f17 ~1~ l~ Y_
f
t . ~ ~ ~ rw. isa•
Quil C1aim Deod
teonra.Ara rawK'
Ti[Z GRA-N7t7ft 4ir,:.SO:I i+RpPtSTS£5. TS:L". . a Washington Cocposatfvn. ,
One L7ollar and rathet qca3 and valuatalg avnsldero tien,
cca.fvi arl, ;r o4:. mi 1e th/V A. klANSU:! COMPRNY. fNC.. a kfaehingtan
_ : ' ~i : : : r.
cS¢ la 7:..ni 2sxn~ fral riu~r, uGwie+! L+ ~hr Csuniv ol 5gs,akane ,
' Si+ke aS Na.t lnttan lnslvsLsf any lnt.ra.1 1l+.4reLn .hlch <rsntor may hoPeaf{or +cqulrsi
1
SR =:cnLhit "A' attached hercto.
S_-, .:G [cr c3sC1enC8, CCSEY1Ctiona, tesa[WatiOns ]nd coVeni7ntffi Ct
rv
;.r:.s,: ia:c ; r,!vlausiy :azd: I_nt~r,pmnsnv rlnsf r-0- exr, sr 'rar,
F•.- Ti-::k-'RDtti tT:e 13raperty yraait,~d undcr a Stipulated •7udyment
, .',t ~;;,rro;,rlotdorv ..a. 84-7-02146-7 nnd 84-2-42145-9, in
' • ' ehc a"tatc oL wssh3nqtan v. I;a,kaan Prapertlee. Inc. eta1.
6:0Ci[]43517
. . F-~
Sc_.:~~ Ca: :r S r
/ f•
o° CT' l6i7SESS '441LERE,Of. uxd tarya'auan Laa canxd ihir infsnsEnmS ta Pst raecuiad br iLL ,preM ef1'i[sn
ar+S+U sevpnr414 es+l [r La 6si~sio aMsrd sLu 19L.%LY al 17CGCSRbC C, 1985 ,
, 53 %7k, Uf k~~S111±.GSb~I, ~
rs
C~velp ~I $f'!1'i~.rL
rr+~ ~h~. I. d.y e# f..,.;nrnl~~•~. 1:IiIC Ma.lhr underptoal,
s',n~~rr ['.Lfr m+nd lar shc Ses~r sl ~•.h~n;snn, .1uy i•unr.. u neA .nd a...rn r.srtn-lly sy"aeed
P '{li,:;,()rr a1. wt1J:7llH
tu r~ 4•• .n w f,r 4ha iYnul*nl urA t+Y.rts+r ~ry,ccsfvel+. ol
;Ip~rSrSf! PI"iPl"i+q'ft 1:. frlt'.
11.e ~•.r,• r~i~m+ th.3 rx.oii.d. 1ka Iorryo-K 4nairun.cnt. an4 sc1.-ln4tn! the W.i LnfruTtM 10 4n 111e frrM .nd
r.1.,nisrp vt .s+.4 a»d ul ~.d S..r rhK urr .n.l Jrue1-+++ Il,r..in . .ni-.ni, -l on aalh ehal
tI.F-f lrn aylhyrjud Ea r,esvis ihr wd uuiru+nem anS tihsL ihs xzl .Ifiahl h1ht eoavaltsr w1 n! xid
ec..~eai✓,e .
R.~arw ory hehd ud W'fKi.l rr! MrHe •11i.ni 1Sr A~y smi T•wr n al..r. 1
~
~ ' 7-
a`(/. i ~ ~ ~ _
; ~wri.fr ~ ~dlr. is. J"•e. ej
• , . . . . , , y ~Y+"u"~'7'^'3
!
• ~ ~
_ / •
~ •
•
~ ~ 4 ~ ~ y
_ . . ~ , . . ' • - hufJ3~~ ri'° ~ s.r«.._ ~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ . . • . r . " . , ~ I,' ~ _ ,
$55 mct l / - • ~i. 555 r~tt 1~~~
• / ~ / • . • ~ ~ . , ^ A ' l
,
U ,
• All that c^rtain real p:cperty Situated in Seeticns 10, 11
. Pa:ce: ~e=:ie=1/ ot Frcovay Ea~t o: Sullivan Road: anc] In,Spol:ane Cour.ey. wesFiii7:Gi:"bei^;
A11 that ee=tain real F:zpe: :y sitLa:ed in Section 13,,_T25N.._R4 morc particularly described as follows:
h.>f.. SroY,ane Coua:y, Wasn-nc:on, being more particulazly desei gEG':i:7It~G ac the incersection o° the ne='`e:l~ _i~e e.` ~~e
as 'o2lows: , 9Lrlingtcn `or:hern (=orrcrly t`e S=;:anc Cce:::':.!ena an_
PaloLSe) Railroad Rioht-o:-uay w:tn a line pE:LZ:e! Mi:h
9c:,~~~I:13 at tLe iatersec:ion o: =ne South line of the 9urlingt alad di,tan: weste:lv 30 feec aeasU:e3 ai
, l:o::=e:n (!O--e:1y tne Sgoicene Coeur d'Alene and Palouse) Raili anglca to tho eaacerl}• line o' sai3 aectioa anj `re:-; t':e
50 feet wi4s and •.+i:h e line parallcl vith and ves;erly l ine of Sull:van Road 80 :ee- wide: ;`:e-=e
: tis:an_ wes:erly 30 `eec measu=ed ai ric,ht anyles to iha East ' N 7e°43'09"1: rlong said nor:herlp line 53E9.96 °ee: eo the
li.^.- O_ said Seciion 13 anC bcinq tne Nest line o[ Flora Road . ~ Eas' l-ne o_ said Seetion 10: then=e T: 0•07'02":: _`:ereon
50 :ee: vi:e: t:eace alonq tho lines ot said Railrotd right- 440.39 feet :o a 1/2" i_on pige tr.azki-ic L4e 1;Z c==.-.t: p`_
_ E°•:c"':o'~:
o:-We.i :1 7814:'09"t: 771"77 fee;, and 5 0'39'15'E 20.13 feet SE 1/4 o_° :1o SE 1/4 0: said See`:on :0: =hencc c
a-? 72'43'09":•: 13f2.95 feet end :1 0124•08'w 20.12 feet and ~ alcng thc :7o:th lize o` sti3 5= 1;: adis~zn.es o`
' -:1 7E'43•C9"N 172.29 °eet to e East li:+e of Sullivan Road 70 fec` to the line o' ;::e ~:ahone~• ~a= z::tc~sio~ =I=ci;'::^.aaco '
~ i `ee_ t`~en:s 5 0•09'O1th"E L`1ereon 112.e9 feet :o the north ; :ollo~+inc che lines of saiZ roaa N 21110'5:"= _].'S `es': '
liae o' _atecstate High•.+ey I- 90: thence followinq tho lines of ~ N 76°43'09":4 467.70 .eat and ` 0101'46":: 112.:4 :eet -
se:= h:#we~ :I 69°50'59`r 160.00 :eet to the begi:utiing of a tan , the sou:herSy line o: the Spdcanc in:e=na::ona1 Fa:l:oa=
c_=•re eitea-ie so::tT.•.+esterly and havinq a zadius of 632.96 feet; i zight-of-way 100 feet wice; ehenee followin; the 3:aes c:
, `^e::ce sou=`ees=erly alo.^.; said cLrve thru a centzel anqle o! saiZ :iyht-of-way N 88•48'43'r 7702.2.; `e-c to L':e bec:n-'_^c
5:•r0'CC» an e_c dfs:ar.=e o: 596.55 `eet: thencn tangent S 3610 af a tangene curve concave nor:hesl}- a::d h3vin5 a=a~`__s o`_
j 270.50 °es: to t=e be=tr.n_nq o: a canqent curve eoneave nor:h.a 5779.65 :cet; thencs aas'c_ly alo^g sa:d c:::~•e ti:=:::'
a~t i:ari:.; e:a3'__s oi 512.96 _'se:: thenee southeasterly along ~ I ,v cen t:al nngle o: 13•5:'39" an a:c d:s:a-ce cf 1403.::. °ee_•
cs^re t=:j a cen=_al an31e o.. 31•42'30" an arc distance of 283. thenco tangen: N 7:°S~'Oa"E ob4.22 feet co the scu_`~es:c:l}•
~ =ae_: t':en=e 5 22•08'29"w 28.93 :eet; thence 5 73•33*30^E 270
!e line of thc inlar.o °_rpi:e Paper Gonnar.~• rail=cad ri:::t-e=-wa}• • -
I et to ~~e ?as= line o= the land dascribed in tha Real Escate i ILI~ k1 20 _eet wiCe thenee along said z:eh:-e:-a}• be:-= a c::::•e
Cznt_act Dated July 27, 1978 an3 filed in the O:fice of the Aud ' o concave no:;hensterly and havinq a racius of 965.3: :ee_
• o: said Cour.ty u.~9er Aucito_'s File 2i0. 7807190367: LAence NO• (::cn a tangent bearing 5 3]•78'li"E) ty:u a cent=a: a::=1e
alon^ sai3 =as: 1 L1e 509.06 :eet to the North line of the South ~
~ of 9123' 17" an are tistanee o= 158.18 feet; t:~e:~ce ;ar.ce
::or_`.east 1/4 of said section; tnence 5 89°55'50'E tAereon . 5 43•01'34"£ 912.09 feet 4o the bes:nning o= a:an=er.t c_~•e
`ee: :o :tie hest line of said Flora Road; thence N 0'111301H t~ r1/ concave nortieasterly and h5ving a radius o= 26::.9: :ee_:
, 56.64 :eet :o the point of beginning. '
t'hence soutleaste_lq alonc said c:::ve th:s a een:=~3 a:~c=e
of 11148' ]Q' an nrc distancc o° 592.51 f:et: t::c^:e
O S 35•09'36"w 10.00 =eet: thence S 5»°50'0:"= 5E6.15 `ee: -
i co the beginaiac c° a tan3ent curve eoncave no:t`+ees:esly
and having a radius of 5749.65 feee: ehencc sou_:.caaterlv
Pa:eel oL land n'zrt"erly of 9uzlinaton Norther Riqhewf-v:l alon; said cu:ve ehru a central angle of 6112'00" an ase .
a:t; EES: o: Sullivan P-aad; ' distance of 622.28 feet; ther.ee tanoent S 61•02'0:"E
Y • 10.09 :eet to the vest line of sai3 Su113~•an Road: t'le~ea
~ hll t`:a: cer:ain :eal prope:cy situaeec in Seetions 12 and! 5 0147'C:"E thereon 150.17 Eoet and S 0•09'01'_ 156.50
=i T=. •'•44;~ w.M.. ScoY.anc County, Heshington, neing more I `_eet to thc poine•of beginninq.
~ oar=l:::lerly Cesc:ibed aa :ollovs: parcel of land nor:herly o_ I-90 and i:est of Sullivan Road:
~ 3:SI:~:I;2~' et the intersee:ion of a line parallel vith and ? ' ~
dia:e.
t eesta=ly 50 ~eet r..eesured at zigh: angles to the ; . Those portions o_ Sections 11~ nd_14 in T25:i, RG-:5, W,M „
N°s= li~a o' saii Sc:Lions 13 bcing the Easc linc of in unin_ozzorated te_rito:y o_ the County of'SpoicaZe-1:ael:in5:on,
~ Sulli•:an Rea2 00 feet vi:e vi=h the northarly linc of the ~+hich lic vithin thc follo4ing descri5ed `a~undaties:
8:=1i';:e•~ ':O=cnesn (:o=-ezly the Sooicane Cocur d';,lene anc* BEGI`'i:INC it the interseccion of the Sou:h l:ne o` :-le gu:2'_n=::n
Palo•:") ?xil_oad Aig}:t-o:-vay: t`tenee following ehe lincr: horehezn (for:ncrl}, chc Spol:onc Cocur d'Alc~e ~~d ?alousc) nail=aa_
o: Sullivan Road h 0•09'01"w 172,49 °eet, and S 89°44'22^=
10.02 =ygn:ro'-~+ay 60 'eet ~•ide ~.•it:~ the ves: 1_ne o° Su'::~•an R;ad 70
~
1 e` c=•e Ien~ldan:~d G' E<rr.%'04"t~ 99.93 feet to the southvescerfeet wide; thenee S 0•09'01"E alonc said L:ezt l.:fa 18;.C] :eet
.ep_z: pE~e_ Conpany Railroad Riyhtrof-to ehe Northeasterl}' line of Inte:state Hiahva~• 1-90; t?ien;e
40 _..cn=c 5 5'•02•C4'L alonq sa:d south- I
alony t:ic linrs o: soid HiShva~• 5 09•50'S9^s; 1018.00 tcee to
weste=:y^:^:ne 75<,gg fe:c t~ :he northerly line of said.
B•J:lin-,::,n ::o:c.*.crn Pallroa! Rlqht-of-waf; thence followir., the ceginning of a tangen: curve concave northerly and having a
the lia:s o: said kailroad P.Syht-ol-way N 78 °63'09"N 568.15 radaus of 758,51 feet; thence u•este:ly olonq said curve tt:ru
:e'~: an9 21•1G'51"V: 40.00 and 17 78•47'09"w 98.87 fuet to ; a central anglo of 16°]5')1" an arc distaneo of 219.65 Lece:
t:e eoint of begizning, thenco 5 16•26'30"w 10.00 fcet: thence ir' 73•33'30"w 4221.:1
fcet to the East line of Section 10 in T25N, RC:E, W. ~ SUBJECT TO EILSEMFIiT'S, AF.STRiCTTONS AtID 14LST:RVATI0e75 OI' fiCt'OAD!I theneo :7 0•07`0:'W thuraon 27.83 foot [o [he Souih line o' soii
L:tz:ttTinC TIIEHkFHUM che proparty qranced under a S[ipulated Reilroad riqht-of-way: thonce S 78 03' 09"E: ehercon 5390.00 I
Judgnent and Decree of Appropriation No. 84-2-02146-7 and 84-;I feet to the point o: beginning. ~
ln Gho ceec of the btato of Washinqtpn v, lianoon Droportioe, 1
ct ol.
•
• . r-
~
, Y-• .
. ~
. ~
~
~
kVk.l YUI. 1157IAGE :]:]5
F1GL 1: ~I~r :{i L'~..I.I [Y
9011290307 eFy1s97
l;~U 29 lV ~11 Pil '9l1 2 N)
~ Parcel Hos, 45933.91J40, 151 I7.31)2(;
lllltkl..l[ Ils~:^11IlF~ 45ll1.9031 , i',idf 91 i4
r.uui r•jn
'SPOKR1iF~. 4QuMT. Y751~
, SPQ1tA1iE CDt1HTY El7CfF1EERiHC I)EPAR'{'1SE1i"P
yLv c". .,Inrt 5prkans County, 4Ynsh[ngtOn
CAy,L[I'~'f&A'-u ARAIHlICE P1VSEH4I1T
TIiu Cr3n[or[si A. h. Ilanacn Camgany, Fnc„ of tlia County ❑F Spokbnn, Srni p „i
H4111iIngEftrl, fo [ 8rfd lfl coriaidecation of M11[N81 Ber1CP1tS, tlie ccCelpt of rlilch is
h~reby acknnwledqHd, granta Co SpEokane Ceunry, nppllClea] s-:Ih1fM{4fnn nf tls.. nrarc
of HwslilnJ[on, .Srl gS4@mriAt oVdCj UfldBCi PpOn esld 047f99A thd 3iefe ln a[kCi ds•nC711i3•4
la~~iu Sliunted ln ths Cautity O! gp6kan0. 5[a[e of kieSliins3EOn;
~A atrip ok land 90 fert ln +rld[h Ad]oining the nar[hecly al I af +rny 1driu
of 1itiillana Avenue uceoaa Got 1 er`~as ruanrJod
3n ilo.ik l4 ❑f pla[s. pu,3 25 4nd 26, and
\'~A strf{l ni lancl 11] Cput lrt yldth adjof[sing thc goiithecly rig9it'af Nay 11rir, ^
iif l41,11.1na Avenue aCrQaT~.t,at-7.~1nck 1. 5u11fva~PnXgt Centea9 recor~lwl
Sn isour~ 19 a[ Plaes, Pngea 25 and xb. ¢ ~1
AIS Incaltd In Secelone II, 1] asld 11. Tnvnship 25. Range 94 ea:se, H.N. In :rG-nhanc Caincy, usatsl«qtbn.
IlFin1rIACP F.nNMiertTS, nn ehn++n IsereSnaEare ara FoY tho purpoae of lhsCallin-i,
o;perutliiq niisl walistalnfng dralnage awa7ea and deelnaga Facllitles en dicpoae o1
. rLinoFi, sre lierchy granEcd. `Pha ecunty a[ SpaRanQ Io Iierehy gcant-d [ttc rfq4k •-P
fiigruea aii-I Cgie54 [o a11 dra9nage easements ad}acenG tn ena punlic eiqliC of ++dy.
7fie pF9l-uItY D4nRI slsall malntaYn tha dcainage s+ra Sa w ltii e germanenk l lve cnue r u f
I~t+il Surl, ulCh e;p[i9nak shfuh4ffcy +and/uC [c[sau, ++1s[cti dn no! Olrztiuc[ [ht flrsu n4nl
I- eccslbLlriii a( atorm drntnage vater in elia drnlnag$ euale ae inillcate.l by cli-,
i-Iip7RV(;d plafi9.
7'!Fr Eiaiwen[ dnacalhed hvC1Clnshade !e to and afiA$6 ciin wiCN kliv lnnsl, riii
mui3dilcRtlaii of the 4Wndaedem Q! Bald eaeemenC can 6e wadr wi[haut Che prl•ir
b{Nraval of 5pokene Caufity.
Ilt 111TUESS HIiEAEr]F, sadd cnrpQret[on haB Cauaed this ina[rumenE to be easciitr-l i)y
leu p[npct niflcv[a aod lS.e cacpatatp eeak eo ha harasinea a8[3avd thln 1.~; 4 day
of 1990.
R. A. 11AfIS01I CoHI'AIIY, IIIC.
P[uay~3nnt
",'d'ATI& nY HASII11x:7i1r1 }
Zi1lIIITY UY SV~OSAll6 b S8
nn t1i1s IT~`~`tday aC Hnvq.1nL1gr i 1990, beiace me, the unde[stgrie-l, a Ir-itaty
Ciilk, flc lii anJ for Efia Statg of Washingtcn, Quly cammlaslanad and 3wnfii purannally
aIIIIiap[Lr1 H. A. iisnscn [6 m4 kryGVry kn h0 th! pRE91DE11'C OF R. A. f1or194n 6'+AwE,iiiy'
24io ,i CisN CoPpn[at1031 Eh3t pxeCUted thB COClyOIRg EH9LCumQnt, alid ucknriN11•41-Jad Ili•.
u.ifu iiiuEieimsiie cu Ln L3iv Pree an.i voluititary aet and t1atA ❑f saScf Cnrpnratinpi, for
th=: usia and ,purpases tliecein mentionad, and on qaEh eta[ed that I=e uu[hu[itn-l ro
uaLcuLe tliq said IRSL[umenC. ~
, • [t1 Hl'i'IIY.s5 M1lileilEOP, I'hnVO haeeunEO oat mp han4 and a[flaed my afESc[a9 r3CA1, t0iu
aay and ycar Cirst apove ucitten.
ti i aineary rulk llc
, [n and Fnr the Slate n{ ifazii iuqi 1 -n,
[ee;dlng at fEi.nkinn.
J4 ui elg4rl fE rlen sajd iIAi 61 *a) rnd ie►p i6e wa3me 1liYi a~ 144~y 119[=e}. 4Wf~:
••~~~~~r JaR4 elAI dire Mr.rds orliaJl wu[ br Inlir6werd m irsikdr i.ey t.ewS., rmps elhrr Cha+ Z ~ r~ r A
~y~,~ewci•aedlhKr~ +1$61 fo mp. [lss4 m lell a!1 pro:iea A-d desd sirfs rr6 vangs ( rollead•r1y jlanr~, ~
los+erA nr Ird o•aEd b7 il.a Cwaewr .dprrai rs i6r +be.~rdr~stlb~.l rfltRi v! .ar. +ide1R 7rari %o '
~.1~dds'u ~j ••'!we r1 d. sr*ewrlive w eF% rrrl1nre af ihr rlteerie mraara101e0 fwellilkI kens-6skrie ~ i
TRAHSMi$tiZITX Lf4E k
. . le !o k.~re~r/ ~aa c~{moaikw i. i.r•lludid r LLr re..:d`r.~iQw +~ird aFwre iir ererw • .lISEME@~T ,a.
~i ~yy.~ OZ' l~ ! q ✓ lH[ iR fidib p[i ~ Z1d4~ /Zditar r .
,-~*NLsfy"b*tmm go,iliT StaL16w 12+50 end 17+$0 mm1 botxe*n Sms-rvr StalSDn! 33+[[9 uid ?Lr GI1AN7'UR, bnei. w 7s) ~.d rhteh- ~.A~ , jrLAM 't!' r. • ,
~•~,qp; , ; ` "'I~.r TAT~ 1I ~ - .
~a~ ~ • ~
.1+~ . v • ~ • ;;"'~}~i~L~ ~l r ,
~a- .1:, i ~ i '
f ~ . . . . i . - : F r ~ 1 ~ r •--ti
,~d cnu3pna+s. w1 rie6 er r.r -n.we [l e..R.. 0- ~ ■pril 15. 1756
f° t• ~r + ° f 6srrin.llcr called "rrs.ens 4an@.* err.^ ) w(6) l+rrqnr da~trr mea rLercalEn
baeiWur eallsd "(vmrt d.~n~n nee1" 1 T'~6r o.,~hs w C.P. I.m6 ar Irll d+nprr vG~f oue.xSr al abd sc.pa ( heFr- kr +ad y cen6ileruiaa nf shr aum a! - SS'f~Fi
[nr
kwhtr c+lled "ad&ticus+l darpn 46el*' ) mry on}f 6e eareciud siih.n 2 gra. rfisr .ll prr.ect daq$rr area -
Ywe 6len Ynt. rd dor QI:lTPQ STATES OF AmFHWo, .h,13 p,} rhr "e.u.r .tsv as sLr v.nsr desso! ai Eisc dats vt ' _ _ ° r - - - ' " - ' ` ' - - - • - - ~ - - w.: ! f
.ddfala~aa! dnw~ee frrs.+ eLr r.ss►sr ..lur h.e.a11Lny .i st~r ~d.er el cueeuit ie~4re aat9wr.tt uP 16e ifhl7Eb ? -0}~11 7 •0~•~ 1•
r~srx'' $'fATES OF l1fiER1Ce1. iurh ~yvw+ br m.de vii6en a ~r.we~Wr Te=~ed of dt~s .far rhry harr here aa rr, ~i P"~d ~*d7'~o StA7t5 ~F S~il PIr 'k,~r~r~~~ ~e .h:rh I~e~ah:.iZn.~s6rd~ed, 6r~r6~ ~nne., ~sepa~n.,
. • . • conrc fo ~
FEAVE Att"d TO ItS3LP +~Sd eaira.rn~ -d w.+v tdr L"S1TF[] CTITES UF AS(ERIGA ae8+ts ..aiRe., •ell• rsd 'be [1FI`dE[] 5TA7F ti lPF 5Hi HIP 5 ar.9 ~eti a
r •~~1A1. ~ ~"e~`~fY+~ Ca~enpnl aa4 eij'~; la fntef
_ aed erssc, eaie4.:a, r~qrir. rr6u,1~ u~.e~.ar _d
lonrqzknf rM1rrtrie pa.r~ trsn~..e.,A .rrur•
Ths ianatv Ar"entr ia and aiiA she lW13FA ST+iTFS OF dISER1CA r d n• ..lipn. 461 Lhe t4tls -s .ll
ymL; Yio.bt~~~or seattvrm relaLuYS uron t1+s rajl6t of a.' rn 1ps11 d?. 1956 ~■ad'SaFe Ims" amod pp+vr,awj higna! l~nre, Inr8ud-nF rhr rig6i te crrrt s-h Pylrs, ~ran.~r..~nn rrcusw~r.. . a, rw6lr.
uc
x~•y t1i{r te fo[1 prerea ieier eres. +h+19 temi in 'hr LA"ITER StATFS OF AMERICA oa aacd dEm. sad i'ku Raikr tv +nv ,YPe
oddj~ia~( dai,~r'r veev rLall atie ee che L'h'TTE6 STATES UF A►S£RS[A r=vo L6aor 6srn,~ sw pw0 waE m e6r irr.• ~ ~~~es~ w~ wre Arrs~rrrp ~hrrr~o. ~n. n,~r. n~.n wn.s .rn~.. ~l~r k.1lnw.n"rs1rehrd pycsl of la.n{ in EIr
►Erortff a" CkM riilr'W ►11 }wLir danitrr tt.eS eve pvBwns 10 xh+ u*.0 hrreaf .b.91 ermuv in Ne o~st t6errof +i z
dn 8ep e} cwrtms; wd 6.wr %bs sen•idrraelon ,.e.isd heerin, i+ .aecpera 6~ i6e C:r"ior an full tapsn.wan !or a11 yC°~s7' ~ OP110=00 ' fa t6r 5i.er of WeShi"ton
S daaijrz iintidsweal m~e°etrrc~~s of e.rd saa~t .nd dwngre urt ~ifikea, rsrcia p.)mans1rr any ,r$df,k+wai d.eexee ~ 7'10 • ,
rJr"a'u &iu.fd be*ct`6"s rblrh lmr.y Ee rut undrr .vtMrn1 aI chr U.LITFP S7ATFS UF eWER[CA es hrm rs ~~t,~.~ ~~i ~t ~ ~oz
P^'*~~~ . _ : , ` ,.:y ?S ~erf~,'~i~ ~ ~e.t, 1►f7]~rrEt.~ l.~ Lat F r~i env~fon-Zt, ?o~ahiP
1i.rid
. ~ • .~3k~ 11~rae E~ ai a y Evrf,h of tinr tv11at~
, T~kw G~roe iiw rvr:naa 0 4a ~ed -llb iP~r L'l~4TEl7 STATES OF dlIEIL1U1 it F.strllr sisrd y~'~ - . ~qldt ,~d~t 'fy,~~~ 1'I ; d~ U ~ ~ af O&9.d `~i71 lI
d •msiard o! ~e l.~ds aPorea+ld. 6.~a~ saad aftd la.l4 ri~shi .nd gsuvn 5a .rl! .nd re~rrti ~t~.; rh.t ..ee .re ~ s ` ~./r ~i.'D4 feRE 1'[[~ MeT~li+lai
sa
'
Y;•. . ►r~ia~di taid ~
rF free prtd clrr o! EPC~~"Sli, ascs~ +.s aLrv indi ureiL +••d Wc.i ,~rao" .i U fars.o r wr~ .we r~ J rlrad e6r eisl. c 1 tb-O V. $5 56t W.
• dL _
1,• e to a~s1d wrreel rd ehr quire Feorrs:.len rhe.rol Ritinu ihe i...fr1 slu.va rad ds..od. af .ll F.rera+er •9ww.neen. ~~F• ~~.D4 ~Y~~ U. ■ dlsP~p~ 'C I]~ l~ai~ t~oae Z-~] ' W. S~~rtaaE~l
r~ • r s~. N. 'rt•i~ W. . ai.s.mo ar 330 t..c, ri-acs 11. 76• i
IX It11'CM ViSRHr$r. f.l~e TxT~I@ II{PdRE A4PY•Fi i~IffA.]Q7, hia crvon.l Lhl.r inrir~wmnt 1`diat~naa of t13.Di1 I`a!~ fhs~p W. $3*3~rr Y. a diata~on of 230 ifietj
trs h• siv/d,~j^f.t,jh praper orf'l~'ere tberrcnts d~iy autherSaed wad lta oarparaR+i roal C'•i W. a dlatamo ef 11t] Toc.] f3eanr M. d' f
~ r': U0 i~'~t th~or I. ~'1&1 W. a d.istar~oe of 1iLd.2D Soet;
io ~ trar+aaSo afiS~rad this 3 7 t#srao6 pTrh7l 4,anac ~af
1~ d~ of fS~4. a
~c~~ d~. + ~ ~ ~ of~ ¢t+a~ = oe of ~ N' 81~'$dr V, a dlatss oe af 3D0 iNt, th~ra~
" zt, ` ~ ■ 1~7 fretl thsaese Y, 53-391 W. t d1ot+ame» OS l02
f+4 tl Shaat+ R. 65 5be N. ■ dSita.moe of 2~ S*it to a
,3i • '~~1 ~ 4
- fftl rsa~h qxe~~ s~eRLaa 7.ias nf ro~7.A Seat,f.va 71 rraid t?r aar~ md
T~'idh~ ~xA.e F,4PER aOru+Oi ~ dlst~s,te , gas.at m.3rag E. [r371 Z.
~ r
rr !]9~1.~i isot ~ i~ qntr~r naLloa oax-aer oa F~r ~e~ ]~.ia~ of
f~ Raid ~rri<rt 11 { , ~ ~ ttb* kr ~E i*a i ai Oor~rsrnt ~t, b ~
~
~ ~ j a ~r+~T nf i3~ gELLLBwtbarn i~
Frwrl4aak ssaL tNfi of T'~rr ~i of ` Seotlan ~
g . ~r 'iwraeldp s 1err1lty 8s~[-
~ 1TlE3Ss i~rL
. F., ~ 11f].3~e~ta I~rrSd;aA tSaorYiber1T odg* nt t*fts ooea*fttO
~k ~ t,~sr 4*k-- Ta31 ~7 O
O,f r/! '~7 i~4ltiOn ~lEFSO~L ■
8~r ' Ca~CT, Y~state Hiryrv 1ta. 2, all. of t.he ~boia ~JzL ~
~ir 1f~h1Eh 11f/ Y'1~tRSA !L ri,'~R 0f l.mad 1~ fl~T 1ii '4"ZQth, •
" lAft Yj0 iNt d1JCL4t t7YSs 4II ~ f1~4 OS
• ~ }w'~.~ YL~ uM
fQ7!]' ]i1ls ~ T'T7 2+A fA Pl.Lt •
' ' ' " • _ ~ - - ^ - -7 YW Y
s'.e.. " _ •'Yi'r ` SMfbt 'jO /~i'bfd. 4 dd T1iH gPGZIIi 6'7~i, tbo L~OS8r ~'Ip13 «..yCp ~
~Ie di ~
.+,R=: dq~r9,b~d ry~s~larrt F~~7, ■+i+3 rvn~ 11a~ b~eiryt PQLiz-nlrrl,
T
30d.Fodft [t yi~ .
,e's:: , ' *q' I1~ OS kho IIa~,~ T~a~r ~d.nlatr~ poiati Sa tbe eaaF,br17 _ight ~f
wv ta+Dswsda0'4a Tiar rlght nr Rp !.R Govwrvmmrat t.ot~ '~+U+7
s
~ '.htP E~j '~rfhy Is~ ~ Tauft, ~llWrlLe Mr Olaill r Ra~.At Ti+~ 1
■~e~ af 1634.0 fat; ta~ar~ t~ qa~trr~~~ 3. 66'~5
~ ~ ~S' • : li" a1 zttd S"tton 11d ti_ a, t'3"1T+60■ i. ~ o~
-
~`~'•9 iac • i40ooaG Rnf s1-e. a. 3'3.21 L9■ s~S.S~l~
~:w: µt• !a d~►v~ ~ p~~ r~asiun 2T 3t.q a paaat 3a 14y ~ ~a
■sa P,ana ~ a. a~a~~,~ ~ '~.s. ~~cti. ~
ta &.aaw 1~73.~ r..e r~,
~ a~, !^],l at 1~ ar kC■ ~a~'~~~f P~ (s4.SCa°rth,C~ !J~ 1.Fi.
~ ' ~ n- ~ r • ~_~.r ~ ~ 51E. ~ ra~to
~ 5a~z~.v ~~l57'10* t. ei.~.~ ~ ~ 1 ~ r ..r,s.~ Sx4`~ .
1~ A. r` 1an~rs of 1DCx. T fa,t 4a
67~'F'~.7 r~ralr~t ~i 'kba v~t and r.at ~rsas3';.~r n-r4ir-. et~.., .,r e.~.~tsLirse.
fl. 1he Cnntractor ma KI thin tero `YO~. ~ t] r~ pAGF ~~i ~ i~
, y, years g( the date-hereaP, suhJect
IIo thr terms and cnndltlons of th45 agreement, and xithout cost Co the UH[TEO STATE5
IlniCerl StaCes or the 111sir1zt, relo[atP [hnt sr.ctlnn pf [hr 4a[1Y4ty 4 pEPARFHEHi DF TdET 1kiE11epR
lntatrvl ncrpss Lhr f.untric[vr',; prnprrty wSthln Cho South tlel f v! Sec[fan RIIREIIII pF RECLN'VITf9H
I1, lown shlip 2 5 7lurlli, Neiign qA Cas[, kSl lnruetie Ficridl,in, kashlns~ton, as j Spakane Vdlley ProJeet, Flashington
shaxn on the plaE a[tachrFs hcretv us Exhlhit A. arlilch 1s by tliis re[erence '
made a Nari hcrenf,
9. The Cantractnr shall 6e respanslble For praviding all p4ats and RELOCATIUFi AGREEMEHi
data that are necessary fiDr ohta9ning apprpra] from Spakane Caunty for the
tonstrucCinn of the new waterl}ne fac113ty xithin the LvunYy road .~L.,,,
right-af-reay and for Yhr perTormance af any requlrenen[s mandated by the TiI1S AGREENENi, made this ~ day of 19
County in their approva1 of the ennstruetion af sadd ++aterl4ne fatility pursuant Cv the Aet af .iune 17, 3902, (32 Stat. 388) and acts amendatory
under the terms of saSd Cantract Hp, 14-06_190-254II, Lhereaf ansi supp7cmentarp theretu, all uf xhich ncts are errem6nly rc}errcd
, to as The Federal Reclamatlnn La+vs, 6y and betwean THE llN17Ed STA3E5 QF
10. For and 1n sansldeMatian af [he amovnC nf Txn }Arndred Qo11arF AHERICR, herelnar[er celled the ifnited States, represented 6y the n9ficer
(S20il), recelpt af whfch is hereby aCknerrledged, the ltnlted 5tates daes execuCing [his ayrednent, hereinafter called the Cantrect.ing pfClcer, the
hereby re+a45e, release, and Torerer qulYClalm ta the Contractor, 1ts COPlSOLIOATEa IRRIGATION V153RILti, an 1rrlgatton A45triit prganized and
successars, and asslgns a41 oi its rlgh[. C1tle, and jnteres[ In and to Pxtsting under the larrs af the 5tate nf 51ASFilHGTOH, hereinefter cdlled the
tha[ yortlvn af the lacfll4y right-af-xay Tha[ x11i 6e abandoneci aS a distrlct, and the R.R. FIAHSOH and COItpAHY, herrlnafLer called the
eesult af the relocatSen, pravlded, hoarerer, that such qultcleim shail nnt Conrractib►.
hecane eflectlve uni11: '
N] TNESSEdFi, T11AY:
a. Formal ~ppraval frvm Spakyne County fvr thecanstructlvn af _
the xaterline facillt xithin the Launt reed rtght-of-war has heen 2. SiNERERS, the Contrattor is the mmer of certaSn real propadty
receired hy the Unitesl 5[a[ss and the road rlght-of-xay has heen reytared wnich they conCemplate develupSnq for a Shopping certEer; and
to the satlsfac[ion of the Launty, Sn accardaner xi[h the terms af sald
Contract Ho. 14-06-300-2548. 3. kNEREAS, in cnnnestton rrlth the Spakane Vallcy ProyecC,
bashington, hereinafter cal3ed the ProjecY, the Un1Yed Siates has atqulred
b. The ilr3ited SCates glres rrritten natlce ta the Gontractor thaC certaln land rights 4n the Carder Area, Gnunty vf 5pakane, NashSngtan, and
the new rpl4tated set[i0n oF sa4d laYer&1 has bean constructed [o the has evnstruCted certatn irrigaEfon xorks Chereon identlfierP a5 Line 6,
sat35gatL9an af the Unlted States and the DisirSet, herelnafter called the fac114ty, xhSch 1s lacated atross the real prpperty
oxned by the Contraetor; and,
The pre+nises eovered hy sa9d qultclaim 6y the United States is more
partitularly destrihed as follows: 4, kHEREAS, the 171str1ct is respvnsf6ie fQr aperating anci
malntatning Sald facflity under a repayment coniract x9th the [lnfted
' A strYp ef land 20 feet xide being that partian oP Sta[es, and, •
Guverrenent Lo[5 4, 5, 5, 10, 11 and the 5outh half of the
Seuthr+est quarter 151125}!114) nf_$ectlon 11. Toxriship 25 T • 5. uHEREAS, the Cantractor desires tn renove sald faciliiy from his
North, Range_44_East_•_S#111amette F~erShcan, 1y1ng ori either prflparty end ta canstrvet a neH Materline €ac4lity ►rlfhin a dedicated
s~i~of a centerline as 5ubsequenily descrfbed and included rounty rvad rlght-of-xay; and
betueen YKD lSnes parallel to the cen[erllne, Safd para11e1
lines hefng )o feet dlstnnt measured at rlght angles to the 6. WHEREAS, the UntCed States has prev3ovsly entered inta an
follnwfng dercr3bed centerline: bgreement wlth 5pakane Caunty, ilashington, identlffed as Contraet tks.
' 14-06-][30-254$, dated SeptemGer 1D, 1962, uhSEh pror9des fvr the Gnited
Beginning at a poSnt xhlch is the south ane slxteenYh States Ca construct waierxay Tacllities x9thln covrsty raad rlght-nf-+eay;
(51115) carner betxeen 5ectlons 10 and 11, Toknship 25 and
Nih. Range 44 Eatt, kiylametie Heridlan; Crence nnrth
89 47' east aiang the souih one siscteenth (51116) llne of 7. 1IHEREAS, fL is in the hest interes[5 af the United Siates, the
sald SecCion 11, a distance aF 3,064 Teet; Lhrnce south " Dlstrict aad the Contrattnr, tv effeci a relocatlan of a partSon oT said
66030'3t?" east a distance af 1,913 feet; ihence sau[h taclllty,
49046' east a dtstance nf 132 feet: thence south 62°02'
eest a distance af 625 feet ta a palnt in sald f:arerrnnen[ HOw, T'HEREFORE, 9n cansideratlon af the muCual eprenants hereln
LoC 10, E$CFPTSHG Cherefrpm the weyt 20 feeC thereoF, se[ forth, the yarC3e5 hereCo agree as tollaws:
z
s
Ytit. PiGE
1 . YOI~ ~.U PD rh
G£~,~~~
~ ~I~~~~~~Ir ; ` i i - ~
(Sald strSp of laad 1s ldentlfled as Parcel 6-1 in Ehat
i~ ~I certa7n Cun[r'ecC and Gwant nf Slatrr Mpc1 lne Righ[-Qf-4lay
and Eesr.ment retor~ieef as cyacwnrnt Ha. 11820SC rernrAad 1n
Irol. 854 of Deeds, page 33, Spnkane Cuunty, kashing[vn, on
- ~ ~ - dune 22, 1965,}
• ~ ~ 6
! 11. The Can[raetcr sha1l perfQrm a11 work in cnnneet4nrr xith the
relocatlan af sa}d fas111ty at Sts SQIe C05C arsd expense.
' ~ 'I I F H r
12, The Gontractor sha11 construet the celocated Settlan pf the
; faclii[y 1n accarrienee M1th plans apprpved 1n advan[e 6y the Unlted States
ana the Otstr3ct ane Sn a manncr and cnndltlon SatlStetYVry t0 the Unt4.ed
~e ~ • States and the p45trfct. The Unfted 5tetes and the Q1strlci shall hare xhe
rSght Co Inspect the constructian and maYerlals inrolved xith the relocatien
• • ~ ~ [N vf the p4pe11ne. The relocated sec[ipn sha11 Ge evnstrtrcted 1n a eondiCSan P
, . I ~-'~'•-'~~'y ~ i that xi11 cause nu reducRion tn the fivk vf water through the facflSty at
• ~ ~ 11 -._._w ~ tts present deslgned rapatity. Upon campletRon, the sectinn af fac111ty
shell bQ lnspecied 4y the Lantrazting Offlcer and the plstr9rk or 6p Ehe1r
..-r. representatlres and the CanCractor xS11 6e noifFisd' in xri[ing af the
approval ar dlsappraral thereoF. ]n tase of dlsapproral, the LontracCac
shail 6e adr6sed af the eorrecCive artlon requfred befare the nex fac111t9es
: ~ ' - ' ~ • •I ~ ~ ~__,A~ •i , x911 he approverS, llpon approral ot the completivn fa[S11ty, the o~ershlp r
oF sa3d relacsCed fac9114y sha11 rest Sn the Un1ted States, f
r x
9 • ]
Li' 13. The constructinn of the relocated iac11 fity shall be +accanpllshed
' • ~ ~ ` at such C1mc and 1na manner Yha4 r11i nat et any time stap or impede the ~
` Y I f• ~ V T~ Plovr bf xater Sn the fac11ity. Timin4 of work shall he 5ubjecf to EZle
- , ` ~ y ~ ~~i " J~ approral af the Cva[rac4in g Officer and the 6fsLr3ct ar their
represenLatlve.
i • • J Y . ~1~ ~ 1 ~ . . .
14. The pfpellrse, hacklill, and ++Qrkmanship sha11 Tunform 4o standards
equaY to or e:ecedlag those 4n~cluded 1n the arlgSnal speclficailans CasrerinQ i
• 71
O ~i j` r"•' ~ the arig9na1 constructfpn of the facSlSCy, A crrpy nf the speclfleatlons is
~ - .,L~ ~ ~~1' ~t ~ ~ i; ~ • ' an 1°1le aY the Bureasr of ReclamaElon PaCtPic Horth+rest Regional Offite fn
_•',f ~ ~ golse, ldahn, or the 9lstrict offlce.
~ '{TI i~ ~ 15. Prinr ta ccKr+meniing any ►mrk hereunder, the ConLraetnr shai'1
ensure that approaal to consCru[[ the nex waEerllne 4at911tp xlthln the
Cnunty raad rlght-o1'-Nay has 6een givsn 6y 3pokane Covnty 1n eczQrdance xith
the terms and condfYtons at Gontract Na. 4446-100-2548,
lfi. The Cvntrectac releases and agrees ta irtdemnlfy and hald hararless
E ~ the 11nited States artd the p4stritt, Lhefr aff9cc5, agersts and aaployees, on ,
i ~ accnvnt vf all daznaget or cla4ms far damagest 6y xhomsnever made and vF any x
~ nature wfiats4erer ar151ng out of or in any manner tannected stlth the ~
• T J~' ~ eAercSse by the CQntractar, Sts a4P1cer5, agen[S and employces, of the r
privtleges granted by thfs agreeEaent,
17. Np mem6er of or dglegate to Cangress or resldenC tarmisslon sha11
be admltted t❑ any share ar part oT this eontract or ta an,y benefit Chat may ~
arise herefrrnnr but thls restr}etfon sha11 not 6e cvnstrued to extend ta ~
thls contrac[ 9f made rrlth a cflrporatiQn flr cwnpeny for its general benrfit.
x
• ; . _ ~ ~ ~ I I , '1 ' 4 3
rl • . • j ~ . o . .
• -
' ,
~ ,
• tri. nu rntt 22
• S60.5300102 $20 rct ZL
7. That eo long su1d h16hver ie usad for limltad oete0- publle [oad
~',rpo*a• br ••iUsntity of chn St°n[a. ot nny c+f Its pollClul wbJlvleloll+, tAe , trac[ Nos. VT-1006, VT-101
Gov.rnaeat vlll wbtalo •ac'~. t <<" «°^~1°~~~~on ltne righC-ofW-y aLavher• ~ OS 00 86004T3 ' 2
tAao [ron raid hlghvar right-ot-VAy itl lntersettion v![h rall tcartemiown
line righC-o(^-s71• ~ ' A C R C E H9 N i
loager be ACREEMENT, muda and entered inco on cAi• 30 -rA- der o:
i 'This
4, Should •ay righte •cQuired br the S[ace by Chis egceement no ~
used oc nteded tor yublic hlgAvey oc roed yu[posen, snch riEfit• grnnted sAall , 1966, by nnd betveen the UNIiCD S7A7E5 OF A14E&1CA, acting through tbe
~
i
tecmioace and tevetC to •nd reves[ in ihe Governmen[. Bonn¢ville Yower Admioistrator, •e euthoriced by 16 U.S.C. 932, e[ +eq.,
~ hereinaf[er called che Covernmen[, and the S7AiE OF NASHIRCZOn, Depettmeoc of
g. That any and all dawge or injury to the CovernmeoC'~ proper[y oeuaed 2ranrportatioa, eeting by aod through the Direntor oE Highveyi, hereiea[ter
by or cesul[ing Erom the consCroction or repair o( [Ae State's crossing or ~ ulled the S ute,
taciliu es mar be repalred Dy tbe Govern+ae^c •od cha •c wal coau of •uch ~ repair De eharged a;aimt eod paid by CAa Stste.
4ITtiE& SETH:
6. Tba 5 u[e covenan u•nd sgree• chat iC vill compl7 vlth the termi •nd ~
pcovisions of Title VI of chc Civil RighCs Acc of 1904, 78 Ste[. 241, co che pHEREAS, Cha State hae ecqvired the ovnenhip oE •ddiCional ri6hcro(-vap
ascenc th~C the pruvi~ion~ o[ •sid Aet •pplr to the BCate. ln [he even[ oE fo[ e limiced aecees (fullr tontrolled) higAvay rigAt-o(-vey [oc SR90, Spokane
violatioo, the Government resecvas the righc co invoke the provLsioo@ of to Crennncree pceviouoly Primerr State•Hlghwp 1, es show on that eaccain map .
Sectioo 17.4 oE 2icle 43 C.F.R. of definLce locacion for eeid highvay, Sheet 14 oE 2S Sheets, wrpcored
~ . SeptemEoc 22, 1953, revised April 23, 1986, nnd on file in che Oftiee ot tl.e
7. Ho Member o[ or Delegate to Congr nu , er Reaideo[ Commi~~~aner, shsll Dixector of Nighvaye, ovec and acrost thn follwing deaevibed traet oE lend:
be admit[ed to oc •hare aey patc of this sgceemeoG, or to sny ~enefit [he[ m~) , .
i atiae theretrw, but this provisin shall not be cons[rved to'extend to this the t75i}NEE of Sec~~o 25 North. Range 44 6asc, Millamette
sgcacmeo[ iE mad• vicA • eorpa[&[ion Eor it• gnneral benefit. Meridien, Spoknne County, MaaltingCOn,
' TH VITNESS WfiSBPOP, the pattie• fiereto have executed this •greement ou [he 8al vhich highvey rightrot-vpy cronsea the prior CestmCn[ and r{ght-ot-vay o[ the
•nd rut iicst abova vtitten. ' Governmen[ for the Bonne+ille Pover Admininccation's Vera U p to VAlley 4ay
, Tap eleecric powcr troesmission line; as •hovn on a segaent o[ SbteC 14 ot
llHLSED STATES dP AMERIG ~ SCeCe•s mey of defin►te loca[ion ntuched hereto ns EahiDit A and at •how
• Departmea[ of Energy croeehetched on e segmen[ o! Bonaeville Pover Administrn[ion'• Draving
Donneville Povar Administretion No. 106200 •t[nehed heroto es Exhibit B snd by thie reterence made parts
. hereof; end
• , n ` ftt1EREA5, tha[ portion of the old Tighvay righ[roC-vey vi[htio che BPA Ver•
; Byi.,~ rr.wy~ Sep to Valley Woy Tap elee[rie povar trensmission line i• covered undec 5[ate
Chief, Land Breneh of NaehingCOn Permit tor Pover Sraneoiseion inr[allatione Upoo HighviJ
Aight-of-Woy Ho. 8Q-58-11 (BPA Con[rect No. 14-03-14278), dated
Novembcr 17, 1458; and
NHER5A5, i[ ia the desire oE eaid parties to 4djvet aod modifr the
STATE OF VASHINGSON zeepeetive righ[• of seid perCies to permit the ccossing of [he Governoent'•
' DspaRme of 2ronapott4tion easement end righcrof-ver vitb • mininum o[ con[liet;
. ii IS SIiEREFOAE ACREED:
gr 1. Thet the CovernmenC relinquiehes any righ[ it mey rave to put aoy
atrueture vithin eaid highvny rightrof-vay •s iC is nov proposed co be locaced
iitlec«vr•~c~*w~•'"•~'rt end used rithout pcioc appcoval of [he Sute.
2. Thet the Covecaueent reserves the right to erect, constrott, opecate, ,
and mein[ein Ute conductoz• (vicee) of tAe ezis[ing end future elec[cia yorer
traoamistnn liwe oz line• over said Aighvey fighc-of-vay iu •uch manner •s
vill no[ interfete vith or ondanger che use of Saie righ[-o[-va7 [oc Aighvay
• purposes, •aid AigAvay is ow proposed to be loutnd •ad wed.
Trett Hoa. YT-1008. YT-101
. _ . . . . ~O. . . .
. . . . . . .
~ ~ .
- ~ . -
rrr ix~ n kit i,r. s•'. !J.'~~~ f~wC
04.nrlR ~y~'•.[t; ~1NMi . Ll ti aELS II B 14
~ ~ ~i/' ' i • ~ • Sw..r.i Cw.er, as. r. ~r • i , , ~I . L7~1~ G.`k
■.r ■ - ~ ~ . • YLI. F~hGE
~ ~ ? ,t`~•~;S+i~, 1 ~ %L~`~~ ~ y s ~ / ~7'
~,s * rl• : ✓ ~ ' ' ~ ~ C
1. r~" i ~If I . d• / 'i , ' 1 • ~ : ,
't~ a ~ ~ ~rµ+j ` d~i'" ^ y ~I ~~e ~r*,~' - ~ • ~ ~ ~ 1 0 -
- ~ ~ ~ $ ' • .I~y ~ fa'i ~ ~ ' Ir • %
~w • ~ ~..~1 ~ ~,,r¢tF~'Yf f/q;%f~,-~~" cs % . ~ , ~ • VS
r J u. - . •p+
r y~~i wei~~~o-i~ ~ ~l~;~[, : ✓~i"fti /„r~F •t, ~ ~ F/ ~ ~y ~i ti ~ ' • FO
p
~ : s+~~ + ! ~ , 3 ` ~ ~.r ~ • 1 : F
•y n r
~ ~ ~ - C'~A ; J ~ ~ C - ` , y~M1~~ ~ - ~ T
,o~~~
e • ~ ~ ~
1~~ ~ ~ f~~:r.f"1~a~.-. ~•s' '~~a/ JI ~ jr, - i ~ 1 ' ` ~ _ T 0 iT
! , ~~r~•~~;F.✓~ ~ . C :~+;6~ z~ l ~ m
/ / ' b : . ~ ~ ~ ~;'I - I 1 ` ~ -'rr ~ 5
~ r wrr Aeac R~ .~sYCkep. r ° C ~ ~i, r \~p • 14 ~ ~ p N ' ~
ra! Tar.sC s~eu ~1~. ~ ti[3. M y ~ d
♦ .._s~e f e~,~~ 1 ~ a~~Q(R~:~Gr2!.~~'a i F • « -~F V'1 N r
~ .ss s~+n~ r+~ srrr j~
• - r ~ ,r ~ ~..a ~ rv u p +P+
H
sxHxarr e
`n `v vr ~
x a
. , ir
.rv~.~ t • , s fp ' ~ , ~d c x .a
! ~ • fc1~ N In N
"w{
4 i,y~, ~ ~ .,r3 ~ c.•e~ C'
f.jD1 • ~ ' _ - . -
l •
faLfC; uli +i^:{".~[rl r "a y ' ~ • '
i;Ea9:5r N M. ERrCA, IM ' • ~ ~ -
MAr 30 9 35 4N
~ - " • .a
WEILsAH C. D:sxnhaE
+~uoinR • - ~ ~ '
etf'dXAkC 0404TY. KAS!►.: ~ ' Y-
~Ei'If~Y
Y. 4•CIU~I'~I~.1 VERA 7~AP Ttl iALLET 11AY T.7P
Sn[Jtnpht Af Oraxing @w A*i a•~A~r gi' « ~ 7 3 ~ . ~ }
- _ ' ' ` _ ' ~f ^ T~ f .f.re 1 ~ ~ { y y~
._.v--- • _.n:r--_..•-•~- V asti~c~~':--• - ~l~' • i { ' Y_~ ~
~ ~ - -
✓ '
' Bocak 575 ❑f Deeds, page 462
" 84 7007A
TRANSNIISSION LINE EASEMENT
The GRANTOR, herein so styled whether one or more, INiAND EMPTRE PAPER
COMPANY, a corporatian, fox an in cansiderata.an of the sum of $1, 000. 00,
in hand paid by the UNITED ST.ATES OF A~`~fERICA, receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, and canveys to the
llNITED STATES OF AMERICA and its assigns, a perpetual easement and ri.ght
to enter and erect, operate, maintai.n, repair, rebuild, and patra1 one
or mare eTectric power transmissa.an lznes and appurtenant signal lines,
poles, tpwers, wires, cabl.es,and appliances necessary in connection
therewith, in, upon, nver, under, and across the follaxaing desGribed
parcel of land in the County of Spokane, in the State of Washinlgton,
ta wiC:
That gartzon of that part of S~2 of Section 1I, Tawnship 25 North, Range
44 E. W. M., SpQkane County, Washingtvn, 1ying ~outherly and Wes Cerly
of atraverse line descra.bed as follows :
Beginning at a paint on the E~.st l~.ne af said Section ~.1. fror~ whic'~
point the Southeast ~cozner of said Sectinn 11 bears South 0°47'
East, 925.08 feet distant; thence North 55°54' West, 952.90 feet;
therace Narth, 77°39' West, 135 feet; thence Narth 3'°35 t West, 205
feet; thence North 72°1[7' WesC, 330 feet; thence North 76°57'
tdest, 215 feet; thence Narth 53°34' West, 230 feet; thence Narth
44004' West, 143 feet; thenee North 46°55' [dest, 120 feet; thence
North 32°18' West, 446.20 feet; thence Narth ?7°47' East, 200 feet;
thence Naxth 84°58t West, 30(] feet; thence Nvrth. 58°41` West, 147
feet; thence North 53°39' West, iG2 ieet; thence North 65°56'
West, 275 feet, to a point an the longitudinal 1f4 section 1ine in
5ection 11 £xQm which the North 1/4 section corne-r bears North
0°37' West, 2,390.85 feet distant; except the 100--foat right of
way of the 5pokane International Railraay Company as recarded in
Baak 167 0f needs, page 523, and the 60-£aat right of way granteri to
the Coeur d'Alerae and 5pokane Railway Ccampany, LimiCed, by Deed
recoxded i.n Bo❑k 143 of DeedS y page 251 and 272, which lies within
a strip of land 150 feet in width, the houndari@s of said strip
lying 100 feet distant Nrrtherly frosn, 50 feet distant SQUthexly J'rom,
and paralIel to the survey Iine of the Spokane-Colfax transmission
line No. I as naw located and staked on the grvund, ❑ver, acrass,
upQn, and/or adj acent to the above described property, said survey
line being particular].y described as fo11ows:
Beginning at survey station 1419 + 54.4 a paint on the West line of
Sectiora 11, Townshap 25 North, RanQe 44 E. W. M., said point being
North 0°22' West, a distance of 678.3 feet from the Sauthwest corner
of said Secti.on 11; thence North 70°40' East, a distance of 3853.6
feet tn survey statian 1458 +08.0 a point on the abave described
traverse line, said point being 632.1 feet Sauth and 1649a6 feet
- West of the quarter sectaon carner on the East line of said Sectian
1.1.
(cantinued)
Page 2 (#847007A)
" The Grantor agrees that the grantee may, at any time in the future,
permit a caopezative corpcaration,quasi-municipal corporation, or a
° munici.pal cargoration in canjunction wzth or separately fram the granCee,
" to v.se and enjoy said easemerat far the eonstruction, ❑peratian, and
maintenance vf one eIectric power distrihution line and necessary appurter.
. ancea, tagether with the ri.ght to clear said parcel af Iand and keep the
same clear of all brush, timber, structures, and fire hazards, pravided
hawever, Che raords ' fire hazards' shall not he interpreted to incZude
, grawing crops; and also the present and fzture right to tap, limb, fell,
and remove aIl grcawing trees, dead trees or snags (collectively caiiea
'dangex- trees' ) located +on Grantor's land adjacent to said pa,rcel of
Iane3, which could fal'l upon Qr against said transmission and signal
' Ii.ne facilities.
Tp HAVE AND TO HOLD saz.d easement and rights unta the UNITED STATES
QF .AMERICA and i.ts a.ss i.gns , £ore►rer.
The Grantar cavenants to and with the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
its assigns that the title to all brush and timber cut and removed from
sa.id parcel of Iand and alsa alI grawing trees, dead traes ❑r snags
. (col.lectively called 'danger trees') cut and zernoved fram Grantor's
land adjacent t❑ said parcel of land, is and shail be vested in the
UNITED STATES ❑F AMERICA and its assigns and that the consideration
paid for conveying said easement and rights herein describe+d zs accepted
as fu11 compensatian for all damages incidental to the exercise af any
of said rights.
The Grantar als❑ covenants to and wzth the UNrTED STATES OF AMERICA
that Grantor is lawfully seized and possesseri of the lands aforesaid;
has a govd and lawful right and power to sell and convey same; that same
are free and cl.ear of encv.mbrances, except as above indicated; and that
i Grantar will forever warrant and defend the title to said easement and
the quiet pvssessxon thereof agai.nst the lawful claims and demands of
all persons wh.omsaever,
IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, INLANLl EMPIRE P.A]PER COMPANY, pursuant t❑ a resv-
Iutian of its Board of Uirectnrs, duly and legally advgted, has caused
thes e presents to be s igned by Pres ident , and
5ecretaxy, and its corparate seal to be hereunto affixed.
Dated this 5th day of August, 1948
IN"LAND EMPIRE PAl'ER CDMPANY
(Sxgned by President and Secretary)
, - - . _ ' ` - - ' e1; n_'- , ~ ~~,-~%f " t~1i~.~!t~l~ L tl ~ 4.1it5 Vt❑
~.;ti . ~4~ ~ F!'~,,~I~~t}~3k~ ;J4Sl1.:L~, tl~•. PL"415i1f1~ ~
Tj'iliF1~
F.nIQA s~
• } I1,7
Dsratrx`-T o? 7ua ~rxor~ , , , `t,,,..•_,
tti~:~ ~ .r
3c~Fau Q?
i'ztidooL" kaelsusgS,on . ~.~i~~~• ^4 ~ -
F e , ti}~ v- Vello"J 1~ -
lrT AN9 f.11~F : l s',
. , ~ ~ , ~^j ~ , ~ • .
r ts ~COR~~iS ~.lr
1oLh~ dc7 • ; .
i4 I3 CON-M=r A!M OIUl:'t 4'F Y~S~ ~ •
6{ ur¢u~s+ce af tho nn4 of dw;o ~9~
19~f ~ x~~sLa~rY thnmto►
. a, • thoraai vY auPP
. t32 StaL. 368}s a~ ¢ata e.~en~aticr7 Lho Unlti~ ' .
, . ~~pEg l~1iF3lICAp horo inattnr at]'1O`~
' bacx~a~a 13T3 fft7l'i`~ ~ ecutSnB ~ia aontssa~~
~ SC~La~r FaPrasented !77 ~e ~•flcor ex
a[r~ornLian.
: i.
. . i q
11e,tiTO-j7 refarrod to ~aa ❑4narf
h .
, . •
art~es ercta dD hareb9 nutua119
~ ~~;y~,Ster ao •
u~l-eSS~, Th~t iSr• 7 •
i ' aGreo aa te13a++n: .;.,.A:-tY
X-1
grant nstd c0n"5'
;IV
a r,y" ' fna Donar dwa ~a~~ .
pop8atual
g ars~6~ r
L .~d-L ~ ~ ~Statea~ itn aucceasora ~ ' t6~
.
S.he U'It~ rBcCnatirucE, ~oPa~
ncnntruc -P
v-Tt'-
G eea~aat ty e+~°+67r sux? jPA
~ . 6reqg~ s.d ~f _ie
gcY ru1atA:-n1 Y~ r~•s.r~ ~ 'r ;j ~~l~ ncroZ] tr'° • ~
!.'.:F r . - •:c~.i~ ~ .
`
-2- . ±.har:~= er '
tr.rsrut4 ° , wTf w Co~-7 of?Sr°.'~R°~ 9tt;,v
aa ~
" deseri~ad lar.d ~:tcatDd ~II t.•o
fal,lewing . . d c~r~sa thereto~
~ , - - ~geg~r xit~s the ra~ht af i~Fp3S an , . .
d0sCS1bed S]Ii page9 la~ l~~-Ie, kdf
. _ • ' ' •
{ty5hlas$~n1
deacriPtio° ae - ' `
~ro ~ t7
~ r• ~ 3 ' . ~ _ . .l ~ ~ ' '
. 1^'~0 ~7 c Esc]ts Trr Erer.tit . ' . I 9
_ w . ~y ~ . ~~d9~'~'' ' • , •
' ;?gmj CAUnty iw7uiar
;1~ •S •n, s.:R ~ .e~P~'S, i . . r' ~i ~ I•'}L •~J_'E ' ~ ~
+ ~"T'' ~ , r~" ~i~~ r. i'7`. , ` ' . k 0 ' i, ~ ~ . P
_ • ~ • ~ • ' w' T,« y . ' S ' , ~ ~ • ~ ~
: .
• r ti~ ~ ~ ~r r • ..C. ~a~ r + ' ~ ~ i
'1~ : ' y;C'r_7•• ...:..~~~F.-s : : , • •i ,Y ~
. s~ ~Y ` ' _ _ , ' t•- " . ~ ' . ' '
' r 't~ ,~i~e, ~r . ' a • n~~ . `tf , ~
.w - . T.*'•?.. F~ •i.t...^ 'r ° •
~ ' ~r~~' ~ i;~' ' ~r .y• , , ; . . • ~
„{r~f.~ ' ~ • _ ~ ' e . _ . ~ ~ ` ' i
F'
. l:ox~3f .
. ~ Z:`S~1~:3~~, r _ ' , i
c:d,~lrh A'rF.A aasemanv Cc*: a pnrS.tiS .~f ~1tii~~e •,~:•:i r:.,:°s Llia ilrif,~ i .
u. wi:.ti sr.s:t Sqr kL) :l,lru; ;+y: I cu ~:tii:•l.q; , ..iatryL~LL:Et ~nA cl ! • ;
;.:,~O1'fn nn :a3loxing dn;crkb:d j~aivcl n_` ks..,1 Lrr !;~akanu Gountyr ' ~ ~I[ • !
• ~wj~ ~±~1 ,7 A ~
%a s: srY 20 :cet of. tho n,: ►.h 30 scvv.•,r Lr.c :,nrLh h~1L' aS tho tAtr Brn+Liivoot c,I; a rt.~r ~ F
S..r~ha.•,sL 311a:tcr (N55sl) Scc',1r.] !:l '~c«:z:.hi' ' :;arL:~ ii.~ie ~L ~ . ' • ' Lrerfl_ f rt]a:5 ~f 11~0 ~au 5 Hc^Yh I~-",'a
io ~a~.;3ti!c ~:~o.
a~:~st~ W•J.l..na:t,a 1~4ridtnn. ' ~ _ T7w uaai r~1 f~y~t ?~7 for't of 9e_Ll7n }l0
EXCF. :,h~,
~ i}1a.z l' xna ac,utr1 a~~• r + E0-4Sen . ~
' ] ~I'~~`•~ ',y y l~iy ~as6' +i},ll aJtLOO:^s-,fiio daLa cA iho u:P1~L uay 4Srygtcn.
~Y r5 ~~st ef titny, ' rwnt7 3
i' ::e ►cst 2r~ ;Qe: af t.t3o aorth 1,017 fact or . Lnc har'Ch ha1.C ot ttse , c
:,ho oi'.3co o." tY~a Cctinu e..-~~incer~ :~pok:..'us
T~~ r 3a4t-~east qunr<xr (PJST;) LJ°CGEYI' tho norin ]C~ fcot ❑S Soetio:l 10 ~ tha da~~: o~
r r eara fr~
Yovcs:.'~tp 25 t:orEh, Rartbe 4!~ Fs~t, F7illa,~c Lta tic: idi,kn. l A1so a Lex ra.'7 easabe:sL ."~r a peno9 uf Lh= acilnn ~ar sald PSr.ty -
~ t7: ~ar.h4.r~'An~
~ , ' ~ • thlslnstrv.pr,t Tn^ ~.nrkinr, =paea durfn~ +~a~=~~~Co~
partal vi ]a~ ~n
Alsa, a Mn:.,pa:a:- sgsrscr~sL Sor u porind cif Y~LO❑ yo:ers fmm Llio ~lala k
q;y tho follau::~6' dc~erltod
cbnva Cascri6ed
-~I\ af :b~s 1rs;.~ont for `v~or3;ir,~; ~c°~':~el S lend con3Vruction
Spaokanea of nns]
County~ af lan3 27 fact. sddn l~is~; eaat ~,}QSrir', txn
w aala-~s cn ka tn}3oxL oaacsgl~ed
, ~ lisst'..i.C.:;.a~: • _ i • . v~ A at1-kp 'D Lr
"a:~I • ~ ~:i eacraaent
11`s~:~ c~f 20 ~cet erl,cL ]y4r.g eaav ❑f aid ad,Dinitzg thQ lart ~ I Parco1 l-]A v: t ~!~e~L 50+1 G'~r3s*rT'i..hce;s:;e Aeae?i~~.t-xe}•
7
~e cescr=b33 easeaer.`. s.,ua. °
id'~f~ ::cat ~'3 fcet _ tha. ~ parLien of c~t the yon Sov.t'~ i: hh:nalthc GT
U
:heraS"s'GZ thaL P ~e ~1js East! i~i13~.'L:.e
V ~ ?'s:^el ?F„1 _ ' • f / . , v ~ (S~.i;1s~r , ~ . " unshi5 c~i Kor`ho S^ vaF~ ~
f r ' e:aYin f narth~~ma'r~ Statn Hiry~sra8 :io. 23 rivh~ o.r
.es;. [D nes eI soutli ti05 fect af the east 1,031 Tnet r,i' T c:idivh, 17
~ o :,Y.s Sov~. h:1i p: t»'ua Horthsaz: quartea• (S~^,r4), ~{~:r~'iTPG S.here:rom
m q' :~c sn.:L 10 SeeL= oS 32ctton 10l iouir~a:,? 25 Nortd~, a L1i £ase • , shoTm Lhi~ date on ;Zsr, c~fi P]a ~ Ns~~ lnptncLLon 13 in :he o_*iee of , i
[3 c7 t:.Lea~:L.a :'xr~,di~.E: - - -'Y; ~ q tha Cbun'iy En;^~n~ar unok~noicGx~lo'~tYr
y ALo a ter^a_ax-~ r; rem^nv Tar ner?r.d a" thrc'a :aa~ ' ~ate o~
A..eo :,er eascrasnt ior a - ' ~r - vQrk i~ sp a sc c~r,nf d c~ in ~=IUMtaen 0. a=~ ~'ash
a i'~ .An=
r ~a p=rind oS thrap yc1.'s rrna. tY~u 'wz'.e i
Sr~k:~a
T, ~
ci t.z:s ~:ruxnt fa: vark#r.~ space curin~ enratnzs'~_oa rf ~azd nthe~£ol7osring ncscrxbed pa~el af lan
t.'~~.~3onn tka iol_esrss-.g eez:er_becS pa: csl ❑f Is ,d 3--1 :'-p~ka:.a r. aaati of ard adths las: ~O:e ,
~ h aLrip of ]and 20 Sect ~.'idc lyi
dc3cri.h^d eaaac^.nt arca.
1
a s-:'ap of lana Zp .oeL xida 13anr,ca~3: af :.hc IcSL s:+e•t:.• ,
:ese:~ad ca.sacrnnt arsa. . ° . Parco7 ]-L9 Seet oP uavc°~~.e Za: L, "~.~1,~.
. , 'Yho ue~t '~D fcaG or tir.~ r~.,us
Pa~cl 1-7 ~'~a~o
Tc,w-i~hzp ~~i NBr',h , 1?ar~e lw East, Walamntta A;arid z:~,
aY •
Tne scuth 1~J feoC of LoLa L_aad S1 Aa-es:o:'Ps P1at I3o. 5,lnccordfi.n'~+ tS►ut por~.lots w±thin tho Spcsano Snw:..ana7, =.~i~aap --C
:a th9 reenttSed ,pJ.at ~ Va1tr..s '+P'1'Ot P~l.a4.9, 'p'aa ~,f1r..Spoka~azotsnty'-' '
Teizshingtan, . , :,c:nr~ura"Y . caccme~rL ~ar a pcr~ ad a: tnrce yeur~ irc~m the ua :o of
, f. tbxs irtstre;aent :'ar woP,cinv, space durins, eor.SLl_:etio~ ai s~a3hi=$~.na=£ an .
Fa;Y51 6-1 • ~ ' ~ , ° i,he fvllowic~; ~escrSbed parcel nf la:xi ~.ri SpoYans Gou.nL9,
Tae smL'.w 24 *acL af the aa3t 1,693 Seot ai tne i.o~h h.a}.P o: t1~o ' n cast uf a~d ad~io3~ixSE tte last ::brre
Scn'..~s:e;t Guar`„er (~i~S~x)r aS Sectivn 1i7, Tounship 2$ Y7orLh, F~ir~e al~ A aLri❑ o!' 70 Eect xido ~3~ ~
East, bli].lame'.ta Herldian, cscribed c:+~=crst nrc1•
1.1aa, a tmpa-a-y exse.°snk :ar n per~od af ;.}eryee ysars :ro:a thc, data oi' ' Parccl ti-1:, tiarter I Sa;~t f
;hi3 9rrs~ r,:.~nt for vpraLzg spn~c du-i,z~; cor.stmct±on oT aa3.d aipclii.n9 as :ha 10 Scet c" the South ha1T of !ha NarY.kseast C oL .
:Ite :nllc~~ Oc3=:'ibed pareel oP la:xi ~n 5pakare County, }lashlnrtor.: l ' ' h t ti rrit~oTHorSd:.as~. • ~
t3~e north 10 fceC af the ,~ort,h Rs; Xe L~Bast~u TILat i°csa, te-
~ectlon ;.ay '~u-a~1a?~_p Z5 ~
A strip ar zand za xeer W-1ds lying north oT cn3 adaoinirkg thn }ast abovss ` • .
dsle°Sbed easemen: etna. . ' . - "
, 1b
C-4`
• ' ' , Il,~ ' ` ~ ! • ' , • i [ , 1 r`' ,'8 ' " .~Y 4 ~ v.`' , .}w
j , . . . , ` _ ' ' w. ~ ?n . • Y M1 a 1 .
+ :.r~ ' J , ! o . - - • ' ' L ' , ^ r t . . ` ` - a. „ • 1 T . 5 .
r • ~ J. ' . ~1 ' , ' . . , . ~ ~R•~ S • ~
~ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ H. _ .y,.. .~r.~ ,~...a..~.z.._
~ k
~
. ~
• e ~~`7~ ~ ' ' ' ~ ~ ~-i.'_'13; ; ~
. . , F
r.n, iir.<< n-N n
~Y4?"•,~~A}}•y , 4 ~ a~ / { . 4__---.--_._• • C~,~ ~'1+ ~
• ~~s"'~t 7-15 - ~I 1~;oLz ~Fe ol l-lirl 20 fuut uLd-i boSnt! Lhat riurtlon u= Gcacrn:scnL Ia.a la m
P v'ri~ oi }~nit :0 ~ue L i o:i i l 1 ~.u:is}iS
fe+et +,Scie 6eSi,p tlsiit x~rL.on ~.t ttin hartJi hslf (HA)• r P si PIur4h, Ilaorgu bh FaoLi WSllamet:n YoaYdi3.)i
. at ~,,.:Son 14, ~ onlil a
3'ouri.•.'~ip 2~ i~~-°.h fia aSt•ytiLi•d s+vrth of osJ aF;jaSsilry; tliu Siqkann InLer_
i'
s.do of q can:~: ~~:sc ,~s e`1ut,.^, ~.u~La;°e~,]yldca~rlhudran[lun, ua! },o:Ial :Iz17u,~: : ir•nt, of x:~, and naJd atrSp af lar.3 }yin3 oa ex:her
.=ra:;:iiai L•Qicern twn ]L:es pirallal ;v tha Lbmcrli:~n axSd p,ar~~1.1 alda of a ccn;r_rian-a a: uuDSOqwnL]1 dn:s:r9F,ad .~d snclneicd ~,Q}.uoen
t
cr 1:°r* `e:r,fi ie) Seet dSstaaL raassurod at C asirlas ~a
::ro li:ica r~~la~. uo tho ccn:•:rlL.a, raivs ;aral.:el iir.ss bc:.ar 10 :c:t
thn :o1ox1r~
` desc~"Iba.i rca:erline: diotant r,ca3um3 a. ryght ariYles to ❑r rpdfa3l7 faaz ttu: fo?1wSr.g
duacrxhed cnntnrl3ha: • t rf aF at the' P4ar:h .sarter . [ . • .
~.k . ac~SS ~Y3' C,~ :57'r q~ {~S} ea:~cr nC uaisi Sectian ]li• trwnr,p Bc~;lnning a~. a noint an thn H@nt Zinu pi caid Seetion 31, -aid paint
eass, a dis t,s,nce a<<LD.{~ feet td t.l1e {~nint carracr
of be i
po;~+t L~eic,g lo.;ay~3 on tha Sauth 11ne x;,R pnma ~ bQf~ 967 taet, more ar J.caa, eonth of the aest qr.artar (W}] ~
S3• ~~rn- ef w y tate H5h u~naniqn~~ f of nai.l S e ct f o:i 21, aad a n S d ~ a i,z t bc i nR 10 fcs L rorl7s vi Lin Trortb
F,~ L"e "~titr a: the Coun ].I
n~ ~ Y, aa r.h ou n an t he o;'1cia1 pZY~t oT ~ald SecLian ~,Iy linc rS iha 3potsv.a la:ematxonal '~aL1wa7 rSghL oi uay; ~thence I
Z'30 1!s' 33" sest a dis'.anFn ❑fJ1S.~0~i ect~~thencoa outht62s 26cnceaoutt~ S nflc-t,h 810 }19' co..t a d!s'~nnco of 970.60 SrrL; thr.nes on ~.hs arc
a dSaLa^.ca tif 21~.5 tees; then~a s~ut& 129 30" ea5t of a 019 rurve I,ri t3in lofL s d:al~ce ot 1,D6r3 fecL ta a pa5nt
:-3.: irst, ~ore ar Aesst ta a 30" aest a disz~~eeof lacn.esi irr soil Caiornaant I.ot 5, r'XCeP7Tt~5 thcreftnm th~ HesC 20 fc_t ~
a Fa?1e i__y p°i~'t On Me fiarth lrse aT ttre S ok~ of the 1~10r3 da=crib,d atrap of l,~nd. I
F-^ gacioa • DSsc:3ec No. 14 Cana1 rlght of wa-
1
x-s
6 ,}1GO, a temra-a:y ci:erc:at for z pari6d of tlyrea 7ear3 fraa The date ~
a'tc~s3• cascr4ent Sor a perzod aF threa ❑f s.hi9 irL:tna:nent ~'or ua~:A
_,•i , sS thia iz:L:vment tvr rrsrkin dcass fros~ th~ dat~a n~ aparn dursng con.~Lrvetion o: saTd
' ~ 'i w~acc ciur9~xi~ tonstrucLaan af said gipgliree r~ F1oeZSncs tan the faklouing daecrlbcd pa;cel oT ian3 in 5foY. -
` ❑a tze Sa~lnving dasc:ihca pa::ol vi land yn Spc3k:u~e ~:ovn~r, Wash~tea~: e ~o•.nt~,
' • :u Fias h1 rgtorl:
~ A straP as' i,srod 23 Leef. vide ? ~ c~sc ~brxi eas~,:;~, araa, ~'r, Heste:]}• ta :,nd ad~oirslrti the abovn ; f A strSt~ a£ l~d 2t] !'cet.ride lgin; no:th oP sx~d adio;r_s~g thc last
abQ+o described eaaezent srWa,
z ~ paF,^! ,'~7 a . }
~ W-~ / ca g °a~~r.3 5-~
D A s:~A oS .i 2~]-CeoL uids bciag that ;5artioti ❑t the Sauf,h ha}.f {$~3 f
Se~•;Qn 11, Tovn:.hio 25 Na:th~ ~an~a i,s ?~st, ~ill~~o,~~ta He~fa~~n, ~trip of ~.aad ?f] .'eet F~de bein~; ~.haC Foz*S.an of Gars:n.w~n: Lo:s '
side QF a csatc€r •
6, 10, 11 and th,e Sos'_'i t<xli ot he Sou.f:xe~t qu.j~~r ~ 5~~I
' ] 3:~r
l~r~e as tl
;n^1•.:i,.y3 ~etv~en Guo suhscr~i;eny ~escr.iG^d :ad
li ac~i^~ ~ rahl 2 *'or
nes p 5 Lh, ~znge 'Se'idia.~"
p3rr~lel to thr -entcr?in~s, aai~l parallcl 'l; r.~, on';,i=h~e:' ai.".c of ,i ceri',e-l!ii~ 13 r,s^-eq,:^n;,lu 7eMera~ej a.d
tics bcW:~g 10 fcot ciisL:rit mvastiared at ri ,hL a ~
~ez•.e::~ne:
csc~~~sd ~ +~Sleh ta tho SaZ,'nving . ~ ir:~lcdrd bc;,w~ecn >erv l.nca pz:allel tv t,h~_ cant.e:•1irs~f ~~i~ ?~,:aI~~1
. ~ . ~ line : bnLng 1G £ceL di;tan t :a:asvrc:1 ek a-?3:~ ;,}s SolYa,r .
t1:R ha. dsscrihod renter?in~:
a o "t.'~ qua;ter {A.) :oxt+sr o!' qa?d ection 1,1~;
~
nv::h 1'.'.~' :5" east a dis:axe a. 3~1. 7 fent to the thenrQ - • .
aa'_~ a~,n` b~ir.~ 34:at~3 an `hc '~v:^ih ].ine tnQ :'r~~anint a: 6eninnang, ' 9c~ xnn;np at n pain:, Oiacy is tr.o a~.`h an_ sl,at-?n j:;1,~ii] c,••7~r
' rar.yt u~~ =fle~ce riarth 030 e TY' ~tatn Fi~hsray ' bc'.iteen ;ectSano 1C3 +:r± ':own"hxp 25 1s~`{.y, 'ri w•',~ ;~si, rii1_a.1!:.•d ~
. 1630" ract a di;r.3ncn of 20 fee±, ~ i• Marid.Lan; thence no::h 59•1 f]7' eayt alon;; 'he souLh an- s_xxo*::'_h
M1ls~. a :a
ease.-aen+ t'ss: ara:j nc af :Fsee lire of eaici S:ction ].3, a dis'~p:rce o~ 3,~FO !'~et; v,y~rre so~~th 06 3~~ 17"
oT :hfs xr_stt for xar'tang Za-cs ^iu aa cv~st~a rs from the ~,ite • easL a ai.v`anee ot 1,013 "e.v; Lh~noa s~sii: 1i9~ I:6" •R-s: a d+_~taece r°
~a -~e ~olivwi:~b des~ribed nareel cf pa.~d ~n ~pc!:an~MCacninLf ~ slatlhors~;tonee ; 132 ~'eata therce vovth 62° 021 cast a d"aaui:~ce of 62$re,•: ts a~a;~t ~ ~~e l1
' svd Goves:ssa~:~t T.ot 17, ""1CEP'iltx] tharefrc:1 LE;n vest 2Q tee: t~ermS.
A st:iR or 7and 20 Ceet uxdo Iying rresLOr}y tu aed adjoining the abvrre ,
~0`~=~~'~ ~~s~.~oe:~: aea. dlso, a E,ex~paraw casement for a perio,g o~' three ;{ears frors ',hn dste o*
t.'iis fnstnuaen3, i'or uorki,ng spaco durin5 corstaucttan of saS.d pype3,knn .
- • ~ en Lhn folla,nng ric3crzbed parcrl ❑f AarA zrt Spakane "eLxs'.y, ka;yez,;'aa;
.l atrip of 1wnc1 10 f..t t:iflo Zyinr; narL7 of ar.d :dyoining the laa. aho'rg '
dn~c;ibecl eases.ent area,
zc
, L i• 4~ . , • - . r , . .Yr ;i . . ' • , • ~ • • "
~ . . ' , • . M1 ` ~4x ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ . • i ' , - . , , ' - . , z '
~ - - ' F , ~ ' + i ' " . , ~ ! ~e . ' ; : , • • ' s~~ ^ . , 9 ' . " ' ' ~"f~ , , yi.' ~ . .
. . = , y i M1 ' ~ ' J~ ~ ` • V~ i ' , , . r . .
^ . . • , ' ~ ' . Y •
, - - ~
~ : • , • y , , . '
• - : , .
• ` 1 1 ~'~'i ~:St' ' CY ~ `'r~
' ~ ~;~f • , ' ] 1 H'•'~)~i(: ~ r~, ~ ~ '
r• E` c r:. . _ CfU'FJ~n'if1TiS V~~a ,
' T'".o x~st :J.Ta~t vP Lho enst ?G rr,,t ~f :.~~e anut}i lUy fcuU ❑C Ti rs,s
ty.a xdti: : 0 Seret of thr rz* t 3.3 ^i t .X 9I ac s-s l a.l~l 1w1 Z°i~ a!'1 1'•~r~rT A~ ' ~r .
;:i wur~L Fn:ra crSFaLad Trsi•t~, F']n! -No. L, aCr:+TiSs4: tn R1)n rec•ast[.n1 ju~ 12 P urL o T : 1, 97D La i i t ~,f 4.i~D raf 4.3rs &r~r9
~ L`~o xi:
-a'_ - 3j r T o 11~_'`• n3''I3::'r- n-e-3',-; , t, ~:f~`h+~~ :~sn~;tfln. .iths north 14 Svo: n." :ho wa:,t 1~U f t '
e9~ oa oS the 5~ fl[ tha e:.~, u11
Y . . - - • f i ° ~in 3actlnn 17, To.:nan]p 25 N6rth, linn;,e 1j7 -`~o,.f di11a.Teto =•:ar;j:an. r • ~
r
~ •_'~~°C~4'~2 ' " V r._ -._F r i./
71-FFssti ?0 Se+et of the ues: 35.5 ier: ,f s`ra aou:}arls LZG TcrsL of S- A1no, a Lcnrora:-I ci~;¢:cnt lor npnr]od ❑f thser_ yra.,°n f:ar tha datE
: oai :l:c east 20 Scet aT thc src.L 33.5 :eet aS 7racLa 1] '+zd od' th},a jrzntruFa~at :vr 4rnrklra oince dprlr~; edratr~:cZ7an of &aiC • ~
f-e ke5t F:i~ni~.rri~4ed T~g: ts°1.14 Ao. 7i.rncr,o:r1ing tothr R~pipalino on fhc So11uxL~~ dcge:^Ibed land siCuv'tr~ 2as 3po~eana Co•an~t-
~•~e .`ri:'~~rp at 9a vo~tuae_"~A" af e'laa, i~.a6e 3l';°~~okanc County,'~'ashinZtnn. lfa:hi.nALoa:
~ v . . • ;a ' ..d' _ 1 '
Atisa, a t4n~vra.ry aasezent for a, e:-xcd of 4hrac years 'rom tho dato Thv norwh ZO feet of t~c 3~vu, 20 reot a° th~ :rosL 5,530 toct of ft~- .
ai tma 2r.3tsv:or.t for Vrrk:ruz ap:rca dii-in:: cc+n~d ru:-tian of snid ' uiy',} 27~ oi thfl tM1 a^.d tha -avth 1rD frseL af Lh,~ no: ;h 20 fa~L of tbn KenC ~
o r.o cn the fo7losrfng deacrSbed land situnted i1 5}rokar+4 younty, , ~ 1,170 fcei. of :ho Sl of th+~ }Jti}, a11 5n SecLlan 17, Toun~aip 2$ Nort3~o
R I
e • ~ K8.5'G~~:ieR:
~ ` ;F , • • anRu 4$ Fastr eal3n~aetto t*er4dlars.
' • r'~J
4,'y5 ThC bCSt 1Br5 ifBt of tbL' southcrly L26 fect S7'C i' aCL 6 4rtd "k}iP klCSS. P3TC+: ~ T J~~ ~ .
.5.~ aeet cf i~cts 1~..,4s:~: ;.7., pli i:r ~~dt Fa:rs Irrira'cn ~'racts F3at iiso co~:Lh'~'30 fo=t vS tt:c s:es: r...-~i5
l,,a[.:nxdS;r,G W~t:sn raco:dos~ ;~11L ~:i of ~IsLs, r.na9e.37, ~ f • 4ti L 2t7 gcflt o' Lhc :1rS !he LesL
~assn:,y, Was.=A'~.'~;f.aa. •2fl Se^,t of :.he .~:,~v£z, FZ',~~ the awth 20 fac+L, 1ri SectSo~
a` \ •.e _ ~ •L`~ ~ ~ JT~nshi[s 25 ilorth' Parz,o i~~ Eaat, Nill~netto Nntldian;'_~..
u ~ ~cr~c~. _-3 \ - - i • •
' { ' - + ° Alsa, d temFor:~ry easeamzt for a parlocl ❑S t':roe snara fsnm Lhe
- ct la.-.a"20 feat rrldn he,r~r~that co~tic~ of Traets_55}_[ _b_an~_5,7 p
a_„ :date of thil in:t:zment #`nr unrk4ng. apaea during ed:atru.ti.c7 of ,
6 ' yrs_ Fa._s Ir:-irated °r;,ets rlaltIr. s;raYar, ta Lhe raca:ded p7:.t' . ~"J . , u-
~ ~r i~ +~~•..;e-",~"°-.:~'''la.r'3 ~i e 5 S~o~-~.e Knshin•Lan l,~i an ~ ^a i ~aid pipCZina on'2-c Tallrr,nnZ de3cr3bcd lanc situate3 ln a~aa9car:o
r r~ ~ ~C R o ; CounMy, fr?aa}sfngtqa:
ei`~Ler sfnR o' a cc.itsrl.:.no as s~,: aec~cr•LJ„ dazts°ibcd nnd anclnded
be_vicea ava iiacs oa: alia1 :c sha rentc: irr•e, pv nilel 1Snec oc.irig I ~ 0Tha wnuth 30 feet of Lh-2 east 20 SneL af tho veat h4 feel~oTythn_
U a ~ , 17 fect d_s.ant m~,.s•.U ed at right t„ .hT f:l:o ~ru• desLrS.b~+3 } ~J ~71d.5r. F a*ld Ehr eas;. 2CY fcot of the uest 1t~J feet of S.yv 5+~~5y1 a~$?P ' P crnterZ>.ne: t,`le south 20 fect, sn Sceticn 35 To:•nOhxa 25 '+ort.'ij Ra:xgc 1454
Ea3t,
s ~ i3S112?ctro !^er'idl~s. - _ _ _
, f °r;ir= at a ra_nt 325 !'ert :a3 rS :.":u ';o°S.k •ecst coi~er nf s~;.d
t 7-ac: rn the 6sst A~r~ of 3a2ic 57; 'ht-n-ii ❑zst a dio:an.e ('f ! +~:ST F.Ir:?5 k 3'r, -
1i266 ;en: ta 3DaR:1! '20 S'er ' r„ent a ^_'~S:t^. 'r,z:;t ?s..~e v:' Ra?d iract 55y
~ ~C'.•iik.T.'i :hcr°S+rcm th^ L3nf; Raai r±,~:5! t-f f'nrc[+1 3-1 ~
'ihcr ea:t 1{3 :c::. a^ :ho enath 105 Tce;, c" :a='+. 2 ~:d _tse cast lp Seet
j kl.v, a e;9^^tnC fe,- ~ i ir~-: ,i: .r "r:~ tt~^ ~ ek nf 91v-ka 7, 1{l
r F _ a::r3 15, she xsat 19 fvrt oa ~.Yee ~av:h 105 f~ce: of
•
ihxs aastr~...:t cr rrc:•,irh sr, •r: :I :Yr.- ..:m-t_:x~';a:i r, f 3-t xcl ;,a- el_:,e~ ~ 'TracC 33 :.n3 th5 -,~6,i'10 faet crf TC;,-,ts 3 arclj, ali -n desL-Fa s
' J e7 I.h~ {~1F..~iT dencribr} r: iia;,:sL~;t~:~: Irrigat,~ Trac.•s f?~4'70. 2r~~o:win; to' ;~e reco:cSci
Volu*:e nu - n aF -'ia,:.~'gi V,` t ^ : 'f 3 y-~`37`: &Lak ~ne ~aan=:, ~!a_hi~; tca. "
~ 1C rc~' F=dL a .,af la-~ 1s a: z r -n: : 9~a : a 10 •.-o'.
- 1, w_ce stno of 1and .;y2.n; snuLh a ana tsjair.:^;; 'vhe la:::, xeore devcszbea ~ • 4isaj a;~-aDrar`f eO'sc:e.t fn- Z^e: i:i tir~e ?^zra fr.-l t'!s da'e
L, ez;seM::aL area. k~ , o£ :his iastr.a-,ent Too sr^k-j~~ agzre cusinC; ransttuct=cn o: sazd
giPolsne an thr, fal}.osnng doserYbed land aitv.ated 3n Spoka.7e +:ounV,
• ' , idashinf;tan: -
' ' y . • ' ~4 ,
. • ,.~'-o-,, - . li Is
J _ • •~n:^; 5 + , . ` If ~ g . ~ - ,
Y ,F •Y _ r ; • 1 ` ' y' ~`r _ • e ' . , v f-' 'i~, , r-i. ; ~Y ' ' i . 4y ' 'i , 4 . ~ I - . • ' , ' .
. tiT' ' _ r ` , . % ~ ^ , ` . ' Y e i . , _ ' ~r~r' - • f. e ' •1 . n .
_ ~ ` ~f` ' I ` + • ' r' , . ' ' . • , e T y t. ~ ' ' . S " `f '
. . • , _ ~ ' i' ' , ! : i ' . ' , P ' ' ~ ; • S' • '
. . . : ~ , , , ~f , • • I; ' , . , ~ '
I
~ _~s , . . . _ • - - , , ~ -
,.t~.
.12
• ? ~ - p' , i , , ~ g . ~ I Eir.i i~ l~SE ~ pt, ' I'C"i '}Iq ~IR~~. -
:o liml,iurn, m ! 1•~.r~r:in; •,rin 13irSffl• :3I~•1 1 ~l.ri r.+}' aat•1 pSPfllai.h ~
~ , r • an Lliv :uI lo-lfif, q¢•ar r1' r,1 ptrcola v: lrGnd Tri
AfG.n
, _ ~ ~ ~ P, • _ • "
I'.~ra•nl L- 1 4,f j Y r~ _
. ~ '~ihe v..~t ~~i rni•k ❑f 11i. al rl- :,lnn 11, Tr+nrfLSp 2' ~%Fstlii P.:..-NFo
lii E.a=! 4~:lln.ro.lln 4nrS~litn~ ~r:.:YC~'.f.ra rn• Qs 20 tooL, kS.:£PS the
und tlia Cpor:lun u: L?il n lxsc .:a'cst Narl,hnm f
- . ~ e - _ a1l:+.i~ ri,•h! ~sf s•,,y. ' ~ ; r ` .
~ °3"•r ol 3-lls ~'T~ • , ~
~ + .
- . . _ ~ 1~1u~auf..yesr]y 17 :,:c•°, of T_ar.~ ].11, rer'L _`cQt, r~ kho .
eauLherly 10 ScoL aY' ;rrje}. 11
~ FJ[.":'T Zho onit I~] :ao.' i].at'f1o. lo. Ig "
ii::•)L Fn.raa Srr-if'itrr,l i+:iCrn, necordlnp ta tho rr.CarslocS Plat
J~S "f1n v.. T'lnts~ hI rn• 37; 33mkun:~'Coiiiityri:a:;rt7~ni;tnn.
.+°ha I}aaor, h!a aucceeso:a, or caslEna, ar leQaoao, Sf prg, Kr:T FA7iM:3 M[r1
are to be psid fv: rll damagos to feaca9s eroPar troee, drelrm8c as. • PA'rol T-S ~Ta
'Jh9 north 10 teet af ".'ra^Y, 23, 7h -ind 2$, P].at.17a, ~~•~?gat_Fpra~
lqatlon sgaLaaA, Arid SmprqcCaamnts rrithlai the eald rlght.-of-wig, Irt"If atcd 'Proct3, tc^crdln.~ ta 'E.hc rncol[led p7,at :n-te7.L-wip "6° o: i
•3 , t,~•,~ Plata; papa "313,- 5;nlc-ma County, Wa~hinpton. "
ca n r°Qaul:. of +b.nd clsrinF; canstrue:io:r ot the pipallno. Taa ereo=t f ~~1,~En I
_ , L+`~,,: s371 F::'c^7 1-6 (7] '
~"f ~.•'r 'Pne e~!-_ L IG 1 r.3t cf Trne! 25, F.XCEtr:" Chfi :1a-th 10 Soet, °3af.
ef daissp,ee ia to he deS.arminr,3 bp nn appraSsal apgrovsd 17 the
~ 4
kc,A Fnr.na Srrz,,mled 7~nctr, accvs:➢irq ta the recorde3 p1~t 3n=~'alr,~~^'
, Sncretnry of the InterTor or hla duly authorlaecS T'CpSe9G71t.IILi9E dcodo ' Fif ~•"~e'\' J 3Q"' bT°PSaf.S~_'~ye'~3z S;~okas:v ~aun:y~ Nashington. . '
_ oa o- nbeut the dat4 iho dwnnga orcura. !r`j" T Par^rl 1-lXA f11
~ " hd vc',3tS 10 Seet o£ Traet 39 _ a._ • •i ~
o ' , FZat `:a. 2~:~t F r-a..I,y ~:IFdL•,_'f_~C7S • 3. Yt~f abave de~cribed a~eal eaCate i~ Dcing ac~uSrss7 try the U ' reco:~"i~ ~'LhA ;ecor3~1"plat iu Vol~e °D" pt Plats, p-~ge 3~ Spn~~.ne`-'°'
~ Cauntyl M7ash}n2tun, '
, IIrsit.a3 SLmLe3 tor VIn 8nreau of Raclamatfon, pepnrclaent o{ the
•
InLO:3or. , - ~ o .b ~Pareol 6-15 (T) _ - ;
!he L.;~st 10 So_L o: Tract 59, Flat ]:a. 3, '+'ent Fara9 I:'ragated
4. The aroor~~~; to the racardcd p1aL ;ss-Vrluze °T"' o" P~~fs, p2ba 6,-5~`san:- o
grant of anscmeaC harolrr co,-ataltted Sa mub,]ecL tn 00=t,, t,a~;~is~; ton. ~
pr'ea6yY . R i
ly wed rlgnte-of-orV far camnle~ dii.ehen, S°limeop plpelinva, C4Itk7;Y AIiE4 r'
r 1 1 j f ~ ~o
railrvads, :highseaya, :ocda, !o?ephoaa, LeZegraPh ard }owor trana-
Parr.ci _ 9_11 ~Ty
- 2no ticyt 2c7 lect of tF:o aoutb 79 Teet af :he tund the xest
y r..Ssalcn ikr.ee ar puhlkc utilitlas, e.r.d to euch o~.har rlp~ta=of-va e ~ jJ ~
~ ~~y`5%-~' f ry
g, 20 .cet 4±' Lhat pa~+_un of the :^:{'triqSE,xy ~-anq n.rL• ~t of the kpalau~
~L i~.L~ r,~ %es9rvat!rnae~,, r Sn!srests s~.•~r-i`~f-bv~3't~i~a~maixaz~r=~aa-~rrc'~~ 'tiraad rlf;~t uF uav , E°~E~!Ih'G Lherefro~a the nr9ecae°es 1 r:3gatian Canal ,
Fr rht aS Lay, all 57 S=cLxrn 17, Tasrnship 25 Narih, Ranve 45 Zas'
. ~ . a
. i]lametfC i•lc- :clFnr. V'
L
, ' ' • I
• P ' ' OTTS 0_uCfihFMa ARF4
_r :
' ~ - 1\Pnrrcl, .1-2SR (i)
% 1Yh~ roriti 10 =ct o" the =oLL'~ 25 :ect o" ihe ~fC?a'T the 'F:' ca:L 25 fae-t, af Sec•xs:n Tcsrn:h~--! 25 No:-k1hs ?t:,~-,~e East, Hlllaratte
"rldi.^_n. , _ . 'r.r r
' r. ' S
. . t
~ - e' • , , . . i
~ ;;~s ,5. ' • , ry ' , , . . , . , ' + r~- . ' , ' , ' • .f~ - . ' . _ ' ' • -
. _ , , • F' , , ~
r • _ . ' ' i _ " i e' ,r' , 4 1, ' • ~p 5 ' ' ` ' ' ' . , . ' . ' ~ ' , , r, ~ . ~
. ~ 5,ii , ti . ti~ . , . P f~~,' r s T e~ ~
• . 1 . .
a
~ f `S`
.j
: b nnsi l'I.it ?io. 'l!f t
~ . V:irm% 1:Y1},.1 LCd 1'i.itL•e, o L1 iii k)ccti•~q
SbiI) ~$,NOi'L3I, R+iia9e -"'P f'ei:-t Yii.sL wlll1du U'sC ~tc•~ QVncd Uy SonOc niic4 nver whic.1
IJ,TI. •
Trarsa 28 24, 3U, 31 n>t,4 3' tjE N.,, uniivr lina l~r.z•rfi~ ;~a~rst~•~J enI-caieioLa l_ci Lhc Urtitusl ;tatcD, thrs
,~f~• rar;n.v I"rrfjn[c^J :rn~[.~.. h11,1 [I:~• 5~~:j tEz~ f ul Lltic µ = -
, w;~si ~ of Cai•e:•srmcnit LoL I, :Il iis SC c L l.iri 7, j,l„tLvd, inLruslin}; tu 10e:xr0 utirJ ctnSi:uGt an r,iLZzGa,
• ~!.•"19kR3Stl~~1,.i~] Noith, ftAnge 0 Laat,[J."S~_~-"--°_~~-•~~_~.~' a cannl, tinil has KronCecl tertoin tigkits in sald canal nnd the
i ! to npoir.: oii Che^Spakassc &ivcr in tlae 5outiy oE GoVerrZnent ` land iaPoJY wiIiCki it is p].ntl&cl. Lu thirc] pcrsons. gZo:tr satd
Lot SetCian 9, Tesmahip 25 h'orl-11, :ange 45 t; M.
caftrli 3.•, oiPnrui1-inuLcly 300 Fect wieJe, mn:G Vr lesS, 4110rsg ita
Tttiat upecs construcCf,on o£ saici catiial tftia ca.erocnts , cavernFl lengCli and r_xtends iGZ a generally easteriy di,rqctipn
. , .
hc.cia firsnted wi11 traversp or fntcrsecC caid canal aL variaus froa a poirat pn :;};e Cpokane ItiVer iai the iiti"t pf Lhe N4i%., See-
places along its caurse And znterfere with its utila.ty. Thc . tiors 3, i'awnship 25 Ncrch, Hange 44 East, 1diZlamettc Mer£dian,
rep:•esentative:s p£ the Fiureau of RtLl7matian, F7epartm,~nC of tile SPoFcana Ceunty, 14a811in^t0n Chraugh f
. e, , parts a_ the Danor's 2end
Inte:3or of the ifnfted States Wha arc aald hOVe 60ei1 instrumental deocribcd as jE❑11bw5;
isr secLring the hercin gxanted easemenLs iI-a faWOr of the UnxCed
' L€st 10, SOutli ~ rsE the Yntt?-i ~ oF t?:e ,ic-t, all
States are infor.ned of said plocted canal ans9 its locatxon anr3 in SccCicn 3, Tus-r.shfp 25 .`:arttt, ltazge 46 cast, , f'•-
_
pessxble constructiQn upon Danor's Paar3.
Tv protect said eana1, its vse, ALId the ra.ghts and 13~ A& a,~d L,- {~~1 ~~n•_ `s 3~,~?f,,-~ sr ;r ;a a,~;
an,f tlia Y~ r tiic ~ILx ~,n! 1 azSe~r i,p ~ ~ , ; n ,:1-
i^terests o° the I3onar tharezn, and ochers ;.ho night claim sI),-o 25 21DrtFz, 1?a~lv~ 'Co4 °a,^,t, H.?l.~ .
~
arzp rign: or ir.terest therein thrqugh the Donor, the United ThL ~ouzll -'i r f t:1-' Sc.iiLls i; op *_I:;~! v` r• , Sectzon 1, Townyhip 'y I:~rtsti, i~C'Ipe 4%
Sta!es, upon notice given t❑ iC through the 3ureau oE Reclama- • T' TrCCL: 57> 58~ 4r
> - ~*-r 62) 53, 1~76 1:1J 3
x ' Si~st Fat-as Irri~at2c~,"?'- - e~.c .
CS 7~rc] t!: y:.: k p~`_'Ui~-
tiest, IsePartmeat oP the In;.ezxor, bY ponor, ar !~y anq person a
1 . 5E-, alZ in SeCL10R b, Townsnip 425 iroi Flirt, jan4e
cle iming thrcugh I?ono= , a: antsnttcr, to Ioca [e , cr*Is crvG': cr usv . 45- East•, W.FI.-
said canal for canal purpvses, agrees fvrthwiCh, at xts sole ~.TraGts 5, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 1$ op P3at Y rti~l
. , . No. -1•West Farrss Irrigated Tracts, all in iec- '
ca5t and expense, ta selqcate a1l waLer pipe Iines, conduits ond Tp-ShiP 25 NorCh, Range 45 East, 6T.;E,
appux~rtnances fihereto, vr anp pa:[ thereaf erccced pr then , r
3
4 _
e . ^ ' r'. • ' ` ti a ° , . ~ a . - ' , ~ . ' . .
y •ri . r, ' ^ • ; , ~ ^ _ . , . , . , • ' 4!' . . _ , • .
• _ - ; j r' • - r, ; • • ~ ' . - . • ^ Y -
. , . _ , r • - , _ • t r , . - .118205[' - ,
. - ~ " . . • , _ ' • , - . - • ' Trac*'t's 23 , 2~+, 23, 26 and 27 of • -
PZat Na. 2, 14est
• Firms lrrx ~r ~_d Sracts, zll isi Scctioa S, Towa- '
Ship 2 ; _?orth, ~:ast, ,;,M.
. ~ -
'
~ c.il,;t {nL is•tr:. •.n~;. 1o lltlt, Lt>>il .4 c:;l.^.amtni, lltrIt Lrriv~ r.^.e,
i 3 ; ~;'t {:it ' • _ ~ ` 111LCI :•Cf'L, 0111_1.0701 u116n, ur uthr[wisp lnccrferU wllh ca!d c.in•il ,
~ 'i :uch rcluc~Ciunn .^.Ii.~J i t,~c
, t:v i•.utlic:ly t:\t:L'YI' thu c:I•;L lU Lcrl , Lt~ c~,uc~us,ct l~,n, innln~~^noncc ur u0c.
t:~c_tiuuthcrly 10
t;;uesL Fare:s lir~~•.acr.l it•J:t',n e~J7•,,4~Swk~neLCuuticyo ~ ' madc a:, cea::unably dr.Lurmincd nnd dirccted by tf,c Donar, ar bp
[ ih •Vnlumo U" uC S1:iCS. I C
p la . .
;:asl~in~eua. ; • chose claimin,~ through the Donor.
. • • : .
~ j,~~.ccl L-l, ll all in t•)egt Tha: ch= fol lowing purt±ons of t`:e herein granted
,ect oi Tr,c~ ~
i.' ' ~h~ ess. 20 :eec"of the Mest ~o.sl F,,•scc~,:ding co the r`dashind ,
. 'i r q I; ric,ated 'TrT c~• ~1~`- ~ -37 , Spolcolle County, &ton. . , enaements are within the area ploc[ed as a canal:
a = .
,a: :,n Volwc'.~., o- placs, P Se . +
P' ' . ' ' ~ Parcel 1-6 (T) ~
,~f ;V SE:.'TIJN 5, TO'r1:'5Y.ZP -5 +`~x'};' P'~~~~E 1~5 ~5~~ Tho eas[ 10 ieet ui Tract 25, F::tCEPT the north 10 feet, P12t
. • I70. 2, [Jes:. For:ns Trrlgated Tracts, according to the recozded
~?3:cc1 6-15 3,-w'cst-Farms.zrri<e ~Llt,.in Volume "G" of Plaes, page 38, 5pokane Counti, Washington. j.
• i;;~e ucst IO fec: o£ Troct 59, 13t lsti Volumc of Plats, :rbets, nccording to the recotdecl p Perccl i.-b t
. ~age 6, Spokaoe County. Wpshington. T_ne nurth aG fcet of tiie casc 20 fect of TraqC.25, P14C
4)est Facci3 lrri;;ated 'fracts, uccording to the record¢ii pln~in...... ,
,3.cel b-1S, • JJ. . Volwne "O" of PLaLS, pagc 38, Spoknne CounCy, Hashington.
~.ne r.or~h '-0 icet,.~&.,th`= s,~uth 25 €cet c+f thc wcs[ 20 feet of
~ i~~cst p~r.ns Trrigated Tra. ES, accorJing to Pnrccl 1-7
, lat,f~o--' ~ 6, Spaicanc Cuuncy, . 1
Trac ~ _9 p
P>' Ttic iiorLli 20 fcet ot the ucst 20 fcet of T,z~q;,.2Plat 'No. 2,7
ti~ rec.:rded plat,.it~ Volu~= "r uf 4'l::ts, Pa
•1 ' ~ • wesC I'3Z'fls Irrigateci Tracts, according to :.he recorded prac=;n----
::vs4:ngzon. . . t
Vo .
~ i ?ume "0" af P1acs, page 38, Spokane C4unty, Washington.
4T_L I\ SrCTI013 6,' TU'rr*351111' 35 :;Ut'.711, l2:\i7G:45 F1\ST. . ~.F^, •
• • _ , • . ' - a' ~ Parccl 1-5 (T) • , . , .
'-'i~';:; ' •~nto~' i*• j
h311 reva,_t to Lh Tfie north 10 fect of T.ncCS 23, 24.and 25, Plat No..2,~Wes: Farms
p. r1L1 T1$IltS herein 7ranced c
atirn ~'.()J'='•'~ Ir.=i-ace3 T:act:., iccerdi.:~g ;o the recorded plaf in'~'oL~e J
u7cn ~a~ aDzndo::: sn[ or JL.c~r.r.iruznc•~ °t~ r~untcclr-~ ~ of Pla;.s, na;c ;3, :pokai:c U~~~~i~v, i~~•,:~i•~;c~n. -
h M•nicn such r,b;iLS r.ro ~ - 3
1,1 c:nnection
i °arce2 1-S
_^ct...'at, - ' .
'r.e r.c~_h 70 :;r.r ~ :ii,~ ^si. y~l €c^-sF
IJesL F'arng ;.r x ,-a,^...i T,-,i::••,. :crdi~~ ~•.;,Yr- ..,.dcd a.a: :
.,VOlUI[18 ~~Q~~-D~Lr:1LS, 33,`~'~j~!:1~IC i:C:l..C.;,
ALL I:d Sr,CF1CN Ci, Tt7irTr":0?I?' 35 ~~0;:...
.i!, 24.`:Gk. =43 _'A.S1.
PIIICCl 1-4
J ThC south 20 fcet o£ the easG 10 feet of TracG_17-_ai7d the sauth 20 .
' . \ .-''r'- 1' '•,feet of the %jest LO ieet of Block,16, P1aG No.. 1, West Farms .
IrriSoted Tracts, according to the recorded`piaC~YtY-voium`e "b"
• - ~ ; of Plat3, page 37, 5pokone Cornty, Washington. • ~j
• \ . ~ . ~ -
_ •
_ • , ' ; 5
_ ' • , }
`
6 - . , .
' • . • • i\ . . t.
~ . . . : . . , . +`,v.; , ' , , . ' • f • , . + 1 ~I. ' • •l. 1 i.
• • -,a~ . .',Y . ~'i,1; e 1 . • ' • . • ~ ' ~ ////JJ~• ~ . rr • , 4~.. r J~
' . ` rr ; 1 . . . + . • . , •
e .+Y ' • t, ''jt, • ,,..~"1 • • • l• . • • • .l! , ' • . , ! •
, - . . ' . ' ' . . , • ; . ' .
f
. . . . . . , . . .
-4744NA xIc~r oF a~x sas~r2 - - - - - - -
I • • ~ Ir 7nlaad gapirb Fopar ComPany, • aor asatlon
~ .~~Lld'~4.$7r19bi0 F perty Qi the rirsE
If~Q ~~1 PxxE,l,n a~aidara4lon vf C3~e da33sr ($1.+JOS ' in kun4 paiQ,,aan_
vQrye and ntr ta ?AE '~ASHitlO'~(1K RU,''*rIiPO~t C(JllPA}TY, a a r.
I
. ~~'A dptA~~rar0 lnrL . aticn,gas ci thv s eaond grrt,iCe auoos saara +xnd ■ $,,the
ft ~o ~ rl.ght to racarratruaC assd maintaln alaetrLa dig trttn,tiaq
~Dog 31nen ns nnx xacate4 and in p],ace nver,aicag and acraa■ tLe
fa12o.7n dsavrlbad proprrtr in S^okens CouriLy,etate cf Btrati. ~
'++r.farw i~ ~ l j 1 ingta4, a-Wit:
,r:
T,r~tt aix (b) n~ evvan (7) ta Seatic~rs taa {30}, topasf~,p
(95) karta.R.ngo iort7-sive (45) °W.
NOZOMIsi q►t; rtar of tbe Kvrtter~vt q~xartar (H~t~3f}] exaapt tt~at p.~rt Zging anrt)~eetarl~• u
a
Lta ~tght of ~ p# tbe S S P.a. Ratlroad Caarpaar,rs~d r.t.~t paata~ tha Sassthaast quartfr pC
f~-
~at qta~sr (8!r} iff ) 17lbg narth ot the ~l FYg~y,ail sais~g !a alctiaa sixt+~A (1S)
~i ~ ~ . ¢ ..;p t~i7ft1-VITi.(8~i} North 8~sge forty►fira (dB~ S~3d.
(51) sad ttxl.ry~ ~-tro IS8) of 6re~narve Frrtgat_r:t I7IatrSOt.Pl;t "A"~:aa t15e
~~l ~~1~ 9S Slctl,cn t.w.~rs {lg},T~rr'nal3ip trqaLy-rsr■ (25) 4orth,Rta~r* fat'iY-ro~' (44)
I, ~t ~h"rttfirit [w]r th.="ty+fOR3r (U) if3d ttdFt}*-t3vi (.'.6) Qf :~i90P11'l~ .kdditlGfl EO ~p~ ~
r':M4~:Wt 'p*Z`t 6r 4M0' ~;[rty-ai2c (36) af Haaa~'e ~4ddition tio GTeaaeprie deiaribsd aa
woit 17$6 rOeL a' Tract t'h1rC1-iU (3$) 8I1G d164 6L2'3p Di' 17i31d tAri (10) f 0/L ZA
sattA eid* nt aa~d t.mat ■nQ axtepQiag oaet to th8 e cmjnt:r raad.
Lo1~~w.13F v,a fovr (4) tn r,hs aorthrreet qtrirtar (Iwl,) Qr ssctto: thlrtaerl t1air L01~Iihi
~~~Y+~iR$) MartL~x" 'rrCg-Sour (44) M., excapt tharel'ron tha r^iliroad rishk ot ?I ! -.obd 44 tfJAC ,md ai iven (az ) ir che soalbeaat quartar (sEI) er sauttoa ■ls.sn (11 vwy
}
' :.i~ X~'~ ,~Icrs~, rarega • ro~ty-rpur ~~44 ).a4$s.
r s; ~ {J'~~y~° •~i " •s ~•i. • y •
; ~~j. ,`~'9 ~7~~•tii4 elit►eza (Ll) ia t,te Swt.heast quartar (SEJ) ❑f jection E,haae {3)~ : ~ae~• . Ol~yxaAgs forty-farar I~i~4f ~RU, , Tc+'uahip
1i .
~ i ; .n , . . ~'a;~f ~ • $
, - ti~ 3+; • rea ~
'larotl 411j R.f Saanrvay af Smalita 5ubdxqialon,axvapt3syg tharaf: cs tbut
~4vI osravrrYeBd to 4ha NerGhexm PaaiSla Rsilrsp Ccmpan7
, .e
r-~-' E t0 1r~spaaS eaid 11pas tmd to x+~mora and zroas t.~t mny int,~rt~r~
~ar' Mint.eouao omd oparetlnn ot tbo: sna.
~
, ' i ? a~ - ~ •
MY r y;~, ~}t} ~S$ ~rtY qf k~e fi-rn E parc ncnsra7s ~nc4 g ramta tatho par bY of" thi a~odc~d~ ~orjj"
' a'dCa ap,rigsis to ereot ,cU:ietrict,rgoona►~~euOL ~snd mai~tn3n en p19a~Mq;-~~ >~„r~:
At~w p~0yaa9d b'-y Lha yrr[y of tbvnaormd
Nit ~8 rL,rn eeah ~t CbW !'oI1 • '
'~r prvAaxET~Aa. i~ 3~v~eR1~ CAUnty,9tn ta ar 61aa:sln Cssa 5a- - b ':o ~~L, "~-."~'--'r
~ s t
7:at ~rAlij ln ~th6 3cuthaest oup-tor ~tx'. Y.~ ,-~t~_ _
~ {38}} of SBatiab thrat (3),tG~7ahlp.~~;~~~ql,:~~~~; °~ry
- tt4r~r,~Aifl -L'Rrti10!ol' 4«.3~0d,
1a-eOfi aiqYpp (11) 70+mah±p txeaty-xt'rv (25)-Mc3th t6a a fU Fi rs ` _
L~ . $ rty-#4au' •-[46 ) -m11.'~
LaC t9mr,'~Q'in a4i4tcn thirtaaa (I3),toarah1p'Lvanty-fi'* [~5;• north,'~s~e P~C4~+gout"~#,~~ =s.~.-• ~ ~
~3. ~ ' , s . • _ • • . r 3 i 5 -
Tk-at ;4rC of gi aat thlrtj*-ai.x (36) c: E uaoa s a l.dditiov to QracTacraa dissrcrLDsd~as ~ b3.lvsrsi Ltsa
ro a~, faat s+t ssid TrsoC erd aluo a atrip a! Zasad ten {10; fe6 in_wLrEth aa,the frd th i4e
F ot~ a~ aSt Os3s1,axteradiag aee C La t*o acrauntT rcad, • Y ` • -
t~•~-r^~• c:.'"'=` '
~Ujgatbo+r' wLEh'~tba rPght to inspec= aald 3lsna and tc remuva bn ah Qad traca t1est'm~r +j,Dk9ri
Zpra wiLh thn qauatruatSm,zwintenanca ■rA onorotian of tivssaau,.
In r!laaad shvrsaP,t.hr eei.d. It+land rYp3re Pspar Canpar►g b;as cai:zvd ita'aarparithr r~~t~b+~dias3
to hs b4reus;v "baei-ibed and afYixetF and t~eae pres6n9A tu'his exme,nCed hJ- lta afftmirs' ~tl'i- ' -
+mto +~nlr authorIsad"thta 4th day at ~ecemHar,1444.
! ~ ~ ~ ~ ,a ~ ` Sqiassd J%plre P+oper Ce4rp;ay - c
d ~+Irn ~ Ca $Y A.W.Wikiarapoan ~'rvetdept
IknI.axi '
~3~ pag7'Saal i _ dttba: AI.'f. Uitnisrapc+ao 3a4M}ery
.
SSpaidalsarl~fieh. ~
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
~ 13,3C.Ralph 3t4bsar6 Rng.Aapt. A.f!.50.Ic.rith cenat,Uapt.9.*T.Lind#n,• Btghn af T.prr Sav.xrAd by C~
8t4La aS If"t_iacGon) aa
0006ty gC $ppkane j ~ Cu !#sl.@'!~*h dey ~ot F}4v~ar,2940,t+efrrs a~a pareosrclly agpeorecl A.ffi.~fitkuara~+aob aad '~.+~.~'iLtur-
apa*~u to m* kxsvrra to bs Etza Praatdani and .1acratsry 7roaydatfvalq of t~re aCr arr4tfCn fi~flt lxRaa-
tad the ~.tbt3~ ~d roragaing iaits9.aaoat,aad eaknoelodgad tha ¢%td IaaErument to be !he ix+►o ead
~ r8j=taty a c ti aod 4oed of a Ri3 aarporation,for the usen aad pi,irpoeee x}uerviY rWO t iCaeQ sM en
^7 Qath a tated tbaC titaT rsra unttwrised to axeuute a ai4 lnaCreameat.aaQ Eh.i tha g
va7 a~"~~ 1M
"T RYfg osryoraCO aeal oiraaid oarporaCl,an.
-2 Q In ir!lnaer rl--araof 1 have boreun to a rC my harid aa4 afifxatt my nfficiaI ea2 : tha d ay a nsd Isar
~ ?irst abot'e ■rittsa.
oq ~ . - - - - - Wiuiam G.En7'lia KOtiPf Nt?ZS4 IA ■M rQr tpYL
t~ll].i+~ t~.l~n3a Notaxy Pubilo I 9to t■ ar I aahingtaa,rrt; Fding at 3poypze.
13t.ata ct 4aShingt0a t
zUnraiaxiaa tr~llcoa Deo. 7,1941 r
- - - - ' '
RIORTOF14dY IiA SEM 7
un 7otm 3.131ltanapn aAd wifa, 1a lr ~tllisiaaan far ■ reIna3l~
93~d I~s4.g"J,lPt~ ovnaidu~tiQa ❑vnvsy and rarr~an~ aa 7'he 173tsiagtcai lratwr Perar
9 Pw Ccmpany, e+¢Dryorstion, tts rtuonesaora an-l aoalgue,Yhe rigbt
~r Ra4 Grantee ' to aroat,aonstruot.rwavantnus't usd maineitln iia eleatrtaa3 dis-
Joe Ast"art Lcsd , kritruilQrs liae aualsting af xlrna, pcloa axsd aasaalated tiai-
r Faiar Dep turen, to be looaEsd o.ver, i,1ong and aoruia Che fella.inF dra-
3cd tsy R Ldann f7ep crilied proparGy laSpakane ~nuii7ASCaCe as"WevhAngtunit0-liIt
t-;r'1A"1.RF1
lroaL eixtesn (xE) of Old Haav 9mb-diviaton,lt to wa3erataod
•:3kn ~,~:~L+~ and Agrlad that ■o1$ eaeoraar~ r a0~rlrm tho rigki,ti to pkkei on4
~ • - . _ _ r ll ,Rat,ar on aaid vrcpart7'.
r rJiP.~,~ g: : c~ /i „ai;T+~.~YR.p ~/'Fir-:i~: d7. ) .e1al~ 4.~a J^^. • E r'A. AS~r'tik-•i. ~s`,~yl
; •1,• ti'i'['3' -'+~+f~? Y('~~; " ~ ~ ,i~'~~.~ 'r.'''- ~ y, " . . <<:- .~3'.".'~` _ '~N ' - L ~~.='L'-~ '
'•s+"t.;+f~. ~ v .3-u~•_ ..ln _;nr~.•, -'~.~z~,.~.~~.qf5~;~.{~s.~~t.~_-~: t-'?-.~.w:s._ :.J~s,? ,_.~ni`.., k , ,
, - e. ~~'~i,~SZ~,^~~v;iT:~:~~.,•,s:~, ~
~
~ .
5}..
~
S ~ ~yi v
~i+ 1
~
1
1
■ ~
• ~ •
° Y.
r
!
r
~
_ f
. Y
~
. 1
~
~
1
~
~ t. ■
~ .
~
1
~a `
a,
,
.
~
4
I
!
■ ~ ~ .
~ -
~ ' i
!
~
. _
,
,
,
~
~ • ~ r• • x ►
, . ~~f ~
.
,
.
s!►
.
,
.
.
;
_.~...r'
5 1
/
y~ _ ~ y .
s11 ~
]
t
- 3 i• . , .
J .J
~
. _ i .
, d++..~s ry
.
c~~,^~~'~• /r.1' l9.Y.~ T[l I i4 p'.CE 180
li l[:I[T UF Y~! PltY
tir~+'f'f~;. ~P~7YA11Y, Iii~U:'t{'F1~G ~+RPY.~ IP1CO!![~!]flil`I`Fd• ~ nio[»d~llacy vE 1'lIF
WOS!![::.^.;'3 t! YfAT1:R FQWER CnfiS'AtIY, wfslirn, up6re appsava1 hy tlie
wSahinj:o n 5¢ntc OLPartmrnt oC TrarticdaarkatSnn, ta install Ses {nteclm
se•,.-~r destrlbution line in the vicinzty af 5R 90, 5pokane La
r,reenarrea, and Gounty Rnal, Sul.l:van Rnad aRd alsa tsecause thc
cpn5t[uCGiclfi sea^.on 15 shart in this area nnrl Cime dDes nck Pcrmlt ar+
nase^ent aqreement to be consummated in the narmai roannez for the
reauired tnstaFlaExon of said seu=r distribution lint due to onyoang ,
reconstruct(an nE khe SR 90r Spokans ko CcEenatres -Sullivun Road
Intc:crian7e, thB ovnerG hesPby eiCant unEn TNC WASFiTfIC7D#i F7ATER pOWER
C4KPA;IY and/o: iCS suhsidfaCies and assigns and 3n paetfCUlac t❑
SPflCn:rC Y:IpUS'PRTAL PARK Si1CORPC3RhTED, Ehe riqht entty artd privilege
and pernis of ingress and egCess over, acraas arrd upon the herelnaEter
describsd Ianda and furtheC, p@Ym15610n ka Connect into the manhole
_ .+hScn had Leeh insta4led by Prrmitter and ts LocaGed on Suilivan Road .
Sbu!h thc 3R 90lSullivnn ;neerchan7c at the intczsr.ctfon o£ r9Yssion
• pvenue +snd 5uil[van Road; frbm ciate hecea# until completian of
cnns:ructso++ fnr the purpnae of inskallatlon of soar] seWes
d:stxfbutsan lirre uSthsn the rfqhG of uay as nau staked upon tha
qruund. Sald lnrt.Is beGn,) situatpd in the Csxunty of Spakana, State n[
nashsng[nn anr3 describecl aa Fallous:
Thc rAvethwast qvarttr at the Nurthuest quarter e,f '
_c^rtfan_.lI ard ttre 5ouEhycsi quarter of the
SnothacsE quxctce o£ 5er[io12. nLl ln rny~n5tel,p~5 _
Tiezth. Rangc 44 ~EasC W.N-' i
ihis perMik and any acts done 4C vittue nf iE ghaY1 hnve no bAaring r
upan Cutnre nrljotiaktpr+s ar ieqal prorr.edingj [ar thc acryulsation oF ~
kRr: riqht-of-wa7 anr]/or arsy suhsaqucr+t agreementa uhirh mny be renched '
f+rr future installatian and cannection of a sewet trunk Pine, as
apRrojed las Spvkane C4unty, Fcam said manhole to thr Va11ey
Intecccptar. DUe care shall be exerclsed 6y the c'leeiring end '
cpns;cuc.[eora C[evs to th~r end that damage 5F7ALI be held ta A minimum.
Ary dhrag=. sha1L be repafted immediaCeIly and shall meet the standdrd9
and 3atisEaCtlon D£ the iiashirtgton 5ta[e Depd[tment oE Transpareatian.
. !n t`+0 9vent tt1e Naehington 9tate piEse,L[mCRt Ag TtaIISeOYtdtdo[l de[IlfiB
a ut11i[j permaE, the Permitter hete[n has the raght ta revak8 this
' pexmxt tmnodiBteYy. Sa'td natice shalT be suF[icient ahen served by
maiF denossted In a{lniked SCaEes PqsC OfE3ce and addrQSSed [a the
' n.lSkil`,GTQN WA7ER PONCR GDMFAHY, EaSt 1411 H13510n F1Wetlue, Spokane, Y7A
99202.
I ' ir! NirlPES wHEPEt7F, the PermitCet executed Chis permIt as vf the
~ aay of~~ , 1985.
iIAN$6N PROPERTT ES, TNC.
L+:p+rSII:-ini
a•-~ " ~:c:. a1 i v: r ftrwor {Ym+l7anS
~
~0~r. .,1.n.. 6'r.n TrJ::"2 R.A. >1AN~uUH. I'RE5I~ UE~
~
~ tr5:. c ~r e0ar, r,wr. rsrra.:arra ~ Jncrrrs Of WAA(
/
~ .
• j
~
❑edacatian af the Plat
SULLIVAN PARK CENTEft
Restractive cavenants and easementlsl referred to in Palicy No.
of the Transamerica Title Insurance CQmpany, whzch are impased bv the
gedicatian of the Plat of SULLIVAN PARK CENmER, as per plat thereof recarded
in Valume 19 of Plats, page{s} 25 and 26, as follows:
The Public Water 5ystem, pursuant the WATER PLAN approved bv Cvunty and
5tate Health Authariwzes, the laca2 fire dzstrict, Caunty Buzlding and
5afety Department, and the water purveyvr will be installed within this
plat, and the subdividerlsponsor will pravzde fer indivzduaT domestic water
service as weIl as fire protection to each lQt priar to sale ❑f each 1ot and
grivr to issuance Qr a buildang perm3t far each lnt.
Indzvidual drivewa4 access permzts shail be required prior to issuance of
a buiidxng perriit for driveway approaches to the County road sksten.
No direct access sha?1 be allawed from lots to Sulli.van Road.
A public sewer sYSteM will be made available for the plat and inds.vidual
service will be pravzded to each lat prior to sale. Use afi individual on-
sx.te sewaqe system shali not be authorized.
Use af private wells and water svstems is prohihited.
The awner4sf ar successvr(s~ sn znterest agree to authorize the County t❑
place thear namg(s) an a petition far the formatzon of ❑LI~ bv petitian
method pursuant to FZCW 36.94 which the petzti-an iracJudes the owner(s)
pzoperty and further not ~o object hy the signing of aprotest petitzon
agaznst the formation of aULID by resalutzon methad to RCW Chaiazer 36.94
which inclu.des the ownerf s f prope-rtv. PAOVIi]ED, this condition shall not
prohibit the owner f s l or successar (s) from objection to an4 d55eS$Ii1eI1t(S)
on the praperty as a result of irnpravements calied for in can;unczian with
the farmati.nn of a L3LI❑ by ezther petztzon ar resolutifln methon under RC6V
Chapter 36.94.
Utilitv easements as shown are herebv granted.
Lot 3. Block 1 as shown herean is dedicated to Spokane Countv to he deeded
far road purposes forever at such time as acijacent prapearty as platted. The
plattar d9es herebv dedzcate fax-ever the streets shown hereon iar public
zoad purposes. f
(continued )
. ,
Dedacation of the Pla'u
SULLIVAN PARK CENTER
Page 2
Draznage easements, as platted and shvwn hereon, which are L'or the purpose
of i-nstalling, Qperatang and maintazning drainage swales and drainage
facilities tv daspose of runotf, are hereby granted. The Cflunuy af Spokane
as herebv granted the right of ingress and egress to aIl drainage easements
adjacent to the public right-of-wav. The property awnex shall maintain the
drainage swale wztz a permanent 1ive caver of lawn turf, wzth ❑ptzanal
shrubberv andJor trees, which da not abstruct the flcsY and percolatian of
storm drainage water in the draanage swale as indicated bi- the approved
plans.
The awners of Lots I and Block 1 and Lat Block 2 ar vheir successors
in interest shall be responszble far the opezation and naxntznance of the
drainage swales, landscaped median, sprinkler systems anc street 1ights
within the public rxght af wav adjacent to said lats ir acccrdance cYzth the
approved glans an fsle xn theFCounty Engineers office. Mainzenance wnrk to
be perfarned snali include but nat be 1imited to fertilizatiQn, pruning,
mowing and maintenance and ❑peratzon of the sprznkler systeris and street
lights.
Whenever the owners of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Laz 0-1ack ? ar their
successors in interest shall fail tQ mazntain the dYal-nage swales,
iandseamed median, sprinkler $ystems and street Izghts within the puhlic
right oi way adjacent to said lots in accozdance with tne app_oved plans on
fzle in the Countv Engineers Officei a nvtice will be given to the awners
Qf Lots 1and 2. Block 1 and Lat 2, Block 2 or thezr successors in znterest
bv Spokane Caunttir. If not corrected after 14 davs, the Cour zy has the raght
tca correct the mazntenance failuz-e or have it corrected. all costs znvalved
w11 l be charged to the owners af L4ts I and 2, Block I anc Lot. Block 2
or their successors in interest.
Approprzate pernits shall be abtained prior to any wor!c belng done within
the Countv right of way.
Lcat 1, Block ? is 'nereby dedicated t❑ Spakane Cvran~v f-or pa- { purposes.
dmn
~ r
Yu~. 4'~ P~GE t 5 1 0
' DECL,ARATION OF CDVENANTS, CQNDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
F{J R
SULLIVAN PARK CENTER
THZ5 DECLARATIQN is made art thi.s 26tn day of .3une, 1990, by
R.A. HANSQN C❑d"IPANY, INC., a Washi.ngton corporation, hereinafter
re£erred tQ as "Hansvn", and PRICE DEVELUPMENT CQMPANY, a t]tah
corparatican, hpreinafter referred tra as "Price", and Co1lectively
referred to hereinafter as "awners".
F' R E A M S L E '
A. Owners are the vwners in fee of that certain real
praperty in the Caunty of Snokane, State of Washingtan, samptimes
herei.nafter areferred to as "Su].livan Park Center" or "the
Property", and mare particularly described as fal2ows:
Lpts I and Z of B].ack 1, and Lot 2 of B3ock 2, SuIlivan
Park Center, according to pTat recorded in Volunp 19 of
Plats, Pages 25 and 26. in Spokane County, Washington.
Harzson is alsa the awner in fee of that certain property
described in Exh3bit "A", sametimes hereinafter referreci to as
the "Remai.ning Property,,, and attached hereto and made apart
nereocL by this reference, which adjains the Su],livan Par's Center
property, was a vart of the Master Plan far Develapment of
Su1livan Parlc Center and was also a part of the Prelimznary Plat
for SuliiVan Park Center.
S. Hansan has obtained a Final Plat £ar Sullivan Park
Center, of whicn the prapezty is a part. awners intend to
improve portions oLc the Property to al.law constructiort therean of
a shopping certter ar other mixed--use bui].ding impravements.
C. Hanson conveyed Lot I of BZack 1 of the Proaerty to
Przce subsequent ta obtai.nzng the Final Plat, and Qwners may
hereafter, se1l, dispose of, canvey, lAC:Sej or hypothecatO all ar
a part of the Property.
D. DwnPrs desire to subject each and every partian of the
Property to the cavenants, conditi,ons, restrictions,
reservati.ans, Iiens, and charges hereinafter set forth oursuant
to a general plan a£ i,mprovement of the Progerty. Hanson agrees
Lo subject each and every pvrtian of the Remazning Frnnprty ta
substantiall,y the same £orm of cavenants, cflrtditians,
restrictions, reservations, liens and charges as are set forth
herein so that the Remaining Property wzll be develoaed in a
cvordinated, eompatib].e manner with the Praperty, and so IC-hat the
general character and substance of the development standards of
the fleclaratzan will be contznued.
_1y
THIS DOCiJMENT Z5 BETNG RE-RECORI}fD TO EViDENCE EXHIQId'S °A" and "8"
ARTICLE Z ~ 4
COMMON PLAN
awners r3ecl.are and dv hereby fix the covenants and
reservati,ons upon, and subject ta which, a1.3 Iots, parcels, and
portzons of said 5ullivan Park Center ( except that property
legalJ.y described as Lot 1, Blvck 2, Sull.ivan Park Center, whfch
has been dedicated tv Spokane County far rigarian par'k purpases
and which is not a part of tlzis Declaration} shall be used, held.
J.eased, or sold, oc conveyed by the C]wnezs, whether by aperatian
of law ar otherwise, and each and all of which is and are for the
benefit of said property, and of each awner of Iand therein,
whethec present or futtirP, and whi.ch sha].1 inure ta and pass wzth
sazd praperty, and each and every parcel of land therein, and
shall apply to anc3 bind 4he C]wners, their heirs, executors,
administrators, and successors in interest.
ARTICLE II
THE PRQPERTY
The Praperty wtiich is IegalXy described above %s I.].keW15e
shown upon a map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and by thi,s
reEerence made a part hezeof. The Property zs divided into thrae
main parcels as Lots 1 and 2 of Blaclc 1, and Lot 2 of Block 2,
and they are likewzse generally identzfied on Exhzbit "B"
attached hereto. Lot 1 of Black is irrtended tp be used by
Frice for a regionaJ shopning center or fvr mixed-use buiIdings
and the building areas, common areas, and parking areas thereori
sha1l be constructed pursuant to a pTan of development conszstent
wzth the Design Standards Soard Architectural GuideJ.anes as set
fnrth in Article III, hezeinafter. Lvt I of Blflcic 2 has been
dedicated to 5pokane County as a riparian pazk and is thQreEor°
not subject to this Declaratian. In addition, portions of It-he
prvpPrty shown ❑n Exhibi.t "S" have been dedicated ta Spokane
County far road purpases (Inuiana Avenue)► Portivns have been
deeded to the S ta te of Wasiiingtan for Sta te highway pu rpvses , and
they are not a part of thxs Declarati.an except i.nsofar as the
maintenance of these areas is concerned, as is morA ful3y set
farth in Article VI, h°reznafter.
ARTxcLE IxI F7ESTGN STANI]ARDS BOARU
ARCHITECT[7RAL GTIIDELINES
3.1 ADesign Standards Board 4the "Baard"l shall be
czeated and shal.J, have the zight to review and thQreby eitner
apprave ar reject any building, structure or improvement to be
-2-
f ~ 5
constructed or madified within the pzapert~e~ ~ia.~h ~o not
canfqrm to this Declaration and the Architectural Guadelines of
Sullivan Parlc Center.
3.2 Na improvements as herei.n defined shall be erected
placed ar altered on any building site in said development until
the buildirrg, landscape, as vther impravement p3,ans showing the
location of such improvements on the particu].ar building site
have been submitted to and approved in writzng by t1ie Scrard as to
canformity and harmony af external design with axisting
structures in the development, and as to Iocati4n of the
imQrovements an the bui.Iding sitP. Due regard shall be given to
the antzcigated use thereaf as same may affect adjvining
structures, uses and operataons, and as to location of the
improvements with respect to tagography, grade and finished
gzaund elevation. Landscape plans shall include dPsign layQut,
gradirag plans shvwinq twoYfoot cnntaur inL-ervals and spot
elevations and pl,anting plan. Buzldzng plans must a.nclude a site
glan, builc3ing elevation and ma'terial sample board. Any appravqd
plans may be expressiy assigned and then such right will pass to
the assignew.
It shall be the obligatian ❑f each owner to familzarize
himself with the restri.ctive covenants and the rules,
regulations, and pracedures of the Design Standards Board. AII
casts zncurred by the besign 5tandards $oard fvr inspections,
plan review and cansultants shall be paid fvr by the appl.icant.
3.3 The Soard shall consist of fiUe (5) members, of which
one shal,l be a registered landscape architect, ane memher shalI
be a regi,stered architect, anp member shall be a zepreseratative
af Hansan, one member shall be arepresentative of Price, and vne
Tnember shalI be mutually chasen by Hanson and Price. In
adc3ition. Price shall choose the registered architect and Hansan
shall choose the registered landscape architect. In the event
that the rega.stared archstect shauld resign, then Price or a.ts
successar in interest shall have the right to choase its
sucGessor. In the sarne mannez, Hanson or its successor in
interest shall choase any replacements for the registered
landscape archztect Qn the Saard.
AuTzCLE rv -
APPROVAI, pRaCEI3CIRES
4,1 Any appraval requested aE the Board shall be requested
in wr i ting and sha].1 be submi tted to R. A. Hansan Company, InC.
headquarters unless the Board records an instrument establishing
a different place to submit such plans.
-3-
YaL. It 24PAGE 554
4.2 Agproval shall be based, ammng ather things, an
adequacy of site dimensions, storm draz.nage consaderations,
conformi ty and harmany a£ ex te rna t c3es ign wi. th ne ighboring
structures, imprvvements, aneratians and uses; relatiosns of
top4gracny, grade and finished gzaund elevation of the site being
smproved tv that ❑f nei.ghbaring sztes; proper faczng af main
elevatian with respect ta nearby streets; and conformity tv the
purpase and general plan and i.ntent of these covenants. The
8oard sha11 not arbatrarily ar unreasonably withhold or delay its
approval of such praposed buildzngs, structures or imprvvements.
The 8oard sha11 have the right to app~ove reasonable variances
from the standards and guidelzraes prvv%ded herein to meet speczal
needs and circumstances which may arise in cannectzan wit,h the
applicatian for a particular built3ing, structure or impravement.
4.3 In the event the BQard fails to apprvve oz diSdppr47Ve,
in wrztTng, any 3ppraval request wztha.n thirty (30) days after
saic3 plans and sneczfzcations have been subm.itted tv zt, these
guidelinas wzl.l be deemed t❑ have been fully campiied with. if
the construction oz alteratian of improvements is begun in
violataon of the terms and condi'tions of Paragraph 3.2 or withaut
the written approval required in vther sections hereQf and nn
suit tv enjoin the erec'tivn, estabTishment vr alteratian of such
imgravements has been cammenced prior ta the completion thereof,
these gvidelines will be deemed ta have been ful].y cvmplied with:
The r3ecisivn a£ a majority of the members of the Board snall be
the decisian of the Board.
4.4 The Board, in the discharge of its Ot]IigcitlOi15
hereunder arad in its deliberatians, shall act cabjeetively and
fairly in making decisivns concerr►ing various plans and landscape
pTans subma.tted ta a.t by ❑arious owners for considera'tion.
Further, the deterrni,nations of the Board, as to non-campliance,
shall be in writing signed by the Saard and sha13 set torth in
reasonable detail the reason for nan-compliance.
4.5 The 8oard and/or its successors car c1SS3gil5 shall nat be
li.ahle in damages ta anyone so submitting plans for appro❑al ❑r
to any owner ar awrrers of iand cavered by this instrument by
reasan caE mistake in judgement, neglzgence or nonfpasance of
itself, its agents oz emplvyees, arisi,ng aut of ar in cannectian
with the apnraval_Qr disappr❑val, vr failure to apprave any such
plans. vikewise, anyone so submitting plans to the Baard, for
approval, by the submitting of such plans and any awner by so
acquiring title to any of the property covered hereby, agrees
that he or st will not bxing any activn ar suit to recaver far
any such damages against the Board.
4.6 Any designated agent or vfficer of the Baard may, at
any reasonable pre-determined hour crr hvurs, upvn twenty-four
(24) haurs natice during construction ar exteriar remodeJ.zng,
ent?r anc3 inspect any of said praperty as to its mazntenance ar
-4-
C' , ~ , ' b • ~Y.,,;-~; ~ ' ~ _ .
- a '
~`;F~~'~E;~, ~~.,~s=~~~~'Z`~ ~ .
r'~r . ;-S~PC~tCi~IVE COl1NTY,,Wi~RINGT~N~
~i x . " ' " - Y ~fk i ~ - ~f'~"~a, • ~ ~
s. • _ ~ I~'i ;s~-~, ~,rrfp~~-~~ , jq
Int~r-vf#~i~e~~Cv;ei~~murrisa~iori
r~ f . , , °~Sdr.,~•°~ ' . „ ' _
Frant R ~ ~ ~~.~~~~c~ , _ ~ v • - , _ - , ~ . - - ~ ' ~ - .
. • - ~ r ` - . ~ j ~ ..-r
Sub jeet ` ~ ~ r~ r ~ ~ r .
L :•c..~,,~.~~, ~ ; r
_ ~C•- ~ z'~ ~ ~ i1=V~ ~ T"-t4-~ ra„~~-"_ ~~~~~~r • =~r'~
At1.-~-
a_--•F-• } r j ~ I 7
_ i ~ ~ ~.i, ' • : - • ~ ,
'YM iLiqa:' ..'~~i?~L'_ ~r= • f~- +~a r
_ ' . : ~ y~. • [ j r' j _ r~ '*~Y
r
~ • ~ ;s~ ~ 3''~~. :.r~ :'~.y~t i ~7Yr~~-;+~, ~'f' ~ , ~`i,_ F~T~ s = a~"~; n.
_ s : iR~ T,~~~~.1.~' ~ ' •~g I s~.S~~
~•f Y ~ ,r~~ ~
~y ~-Yr ;r_
~ t a ~ ' •f r' ~ ~ -j ' , • x:.^ ~ _
~ A
S,y ~ f •~_~~r ' 4 f~ . : ~ • ~y'e, ~ ~ . ~ i-- ~ ~ U4J a~/v f'+i
7' 'S • _ ~ ~ ia•~
•i~ L ~ A
" ~ i' F ~r °'~'7 v~/~~.~13~3`'t~~~. S'~~~i• ~ui =~v k~' j, f ~r• Yr~ . _ ~ v _ . ~^r~ S j I l ~ j .!'°/fti ~~~~~"L~~ _
, ~ a*r.,~N ~-.:.iSii , i ~r r- •
f y r ~ a.~~5R? ~'"r~ 1 ~ ij~ r ~y~`J ~ ~ _
~
Form 327-C R ~i ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ • i,_ f ~;~'Y--'~
, _ ` + i ` ~ . -=c::
' - - - - . - , - . ~ ~ - l~~
~~o~.
improvements ta dRtermine i.f there has been camplzance with the
prvvisions hereof. The Bvard and any agent vr officer thereof
sha1.l nat thereby be deemed guilty of any manner of trespass far
such entry or znspectian, •
4.7 Records of the Bvard with respect to compliance with
the provisivns of the GuTdelines shall be conclusive evidence as
to all matters shawn by such recocds. After the expiratzon ❑f
szx (6) manths follawing the completion of any cranstruction,
additian, a3,terati.on vr change ta any building an a bui.lding
site, in the absence of any natice to comply or in the absence of
any suzt ta en7aira such wvrk ar ta force campliance by change or
remvaal of such wvrk withira said period, then and in that event
said structure, wark, i.mprvvemPnt or alteration shalI be deemed
to be in complfance with the groEJ'15J,4t75 of these guidelines.
ARTYCLE V
GEATERAL ARC$iTECTLTRAL hESTRICTIO1dS
5.1 Minimun set back lznes and lat caveraqe shall cvmQly
with 5pokane County 7vning and Building Codes, and the applicable
zoning requirements far each parcel.
5.2 Completicn of Cvnstruction. After commencement oi
cflnstruction of any i.mprovements, the awner v£ the property upon
which tlie improvements are being CC5C75tr11Cted sha7,1 dil,igently
prvsecute the work thereon, ta the end that the impravements
shall nvt remain in a partly finished canditzon any ].anger than
reasonaialy necessary far campZetion thereof. In any event, khe
construction shal1 raot extend beyond a periad of two {2} yeats
fram commencement withQUt appraaals far extensian by the Soard.
The vwner of any site ar lot vn which improvements a•re being
cvnstructed sha}.l at all ti.mes keelo public and grivate streets
contiguous ta said site vr IQt, free frvm any d%rt, murl, garbage,
trash or other debris which might be oecasioned by canstruction
of the i,Fnprovemants.
5.3 Excavatian. No clearing or excavation or substantial
site alterativras aha1.1 be made except in connectivn witz
construc'tivn o€ an improvement, and upan campIetion thereo'L
expased Qpena.ngs shall be backfil].ed and disturbed grvund sha1l
be graded and leVeled.
5.4 Landscapi. ng ,
A. Every sita an which abuildirsg shall have beecz
placed shall be landscaped accrrding to p).ans approved as
sgecifa,ed herein and maintained thereafter in a siglztly arrd weI1-
kept condition. Such landscaping shall canform to Sullivan Par;
Center landscapa.ng master plan and guidelines.
-5-
• ~01. 1_ 12 11 nn 5 5 6
B. The front yards of all lots shal.l be larsdscaped
from the edge of the street an+3 highway curbs. Each lot shall #~e
landscaped except for bu%ldings and similar structures, walks,
gavec3 parking areas, driveways anc3 storage areas. AlI of such
lats 513aIlr as a mini,mum requirement, be cavered wzth graund
cover seeding, lawn, bark, river rock or p3antings, such as trees
and shrubs, which will prevent wind or water ervsican of earth and
weed growth. This requirement shall apply as each lot is
developed.
C. The vwner, ].essee ❑r vccu.pant o£ angr si.te or lot
sha3.l at all ti.mes keeg the lanc3scaping in good arder and
canditivn. Should the ❑wner, Iessee or occupant of any site fail
t❑ remedy any deficiency i.n the maintenance of the landscaping
within thxrty (30) days aftar praper nvti.fication, the Braard
hereby expressly is given the right, privi.legeA and iicense ta
make arzy and all corrections ar improvements in landscape
maintenance at the expense of the site owrter, lessee, or
occupant, as the case may be.
5.5 Signs. All signs must be in confarmance with Spo#cane
County regulata.ons and aze, in addi.ti.on, subject to the Soard's
revi.ew anc3 approval.
5.6 Farfcing Areas.
A. No parking of anx vehicles is permissible on
Inc3aana Avenue or ather public streets.
B. A1l parkinq arQas shall be paved with asphalt or
concrete.
C. AI1 parking areas shall be landscaped irs accordance
with the 5ullzvan Park Center landscaping master pian and
guidelines, or as athezwise approved by the Soard.
D. F7etazAs for parking Iayout and landscaping fQr such
areas shal1 be prvvided with the submittal tca the Board for
apgraval.
E. Parking areas shall be maintained in a neat and
arderly manner.
F. A1l parking areas shall 1nave adequate illumination
ta be effective £or night use and general security.
5.7 5torage, Loading Areas, and Fencing, .
A. Materials, supplies ar any fi.nished praducts or
semi-finished graducts stored on the progerty outside of said
bui3dings shall be confined to permanently sczeened areas within
-6-
4t~L~
building setback li.nes. The sait3 materials shall be stored in
vrderly piles nvt exceedi,rzg a heaght af twelve (12) feet and
shall be completely sGreened by azchitecturally designed and
canstructed screens sv as to conceal the view of the prflducts
frvm a11 sides af the prvperty. The storage area shall tae a
drained and gravel surface, car better.
B. No loading dacks may be laeated on any stceet
frvntage unless architecturaJ, screenirag approved in wra.ting by
tna Board is grovided. Loading dock areas sha].1 ae screened wzth
evergreen plantzngs and/or aktzactzvely designed architectural
screens, so as to reasonably conceal the dock from view fram the
street and £rom raeighbazing pranerties. The screening shaT1,
receive approval in writing by the Bvard. Exceptions to tYtis
provision must be appraved in writing by the Saard. These
crnditions c3o nat appiX to i.ndustrial uses ar a,pply to £zeeway
frontage.
C. No fence, masonry caali, hedge, or mass planting
shal1 be permitted to extend beyand the bui].ding lines
established herein excPpt upon approval in writirsg tay the Baard.
Chain-7,ink fenci.ng shall haVe waod strips or other natura1
material to provide a screening effect. In any event, all
fencxng, walls or similac structur°s are su}aject to the approval
by the Baard.
D. A11 trash cvntaznezs shall be screened fram view by
adequate means.
5.8 Buildzng Regulati,ons.
A. Any buildings in Sullivan Park Center shall be
canstructed of architectural concrete, masonry, architectural
aluminum and glass, caarad frame, or any combination of same that
is accentable to the Board. AIl types of such constructivn
above, or any types nat sa covered must be first submitted and
abtain written apprvval of the Baard.
No preEabricated metal buildings, sheds, or metal
covered structures ace permitted. Thi.s praaisivn is raot intended
to exclur3e the use vf aluminum die cast curtain walls or similar
archztecturally compatible features.
B. Finish building materials shall be apglxed to all
sides vf a building which are visible ta the general public as
well as fram neighboring pzoperty and streets. Calars shall be
harmvnivus and campatible with calors vf the natural surroundings
and vther adjacent buildings. The Board sha11 have the sv1.e
zight to apprave ar disapprave materials and calvrs sa
controlled.
C. No building or other imp,tovements shall be
-7-
permitted ta fall inta disrepazr and each i.mproaement shall at
a11 times be kept in gaad conditzon and repaiz and adequately
gaa,nted or ottserwise fini.shed in accarc3anee wi.th specifi,cations
established by the Board. The Qwnez hereby grants to the Boarc3
the right ta make any necessary al.terations► repairs or
maintenance approved by the Baard ta cazry out the intent of th3s
provision and the awner further agrees to reimbuzse the Board far
any expenses actual.].y i,ncurred in carrying vut the foregaYng.
5.9 Specifics.
A. Tempvrary buildings, ather than a cantractar's
field office or canstructi.on shelter, shall nat be nermitted.
Furthermore, these shelters may rema%n for the period a£
constructian only, after which time they must be removed.
Temporary improvemerrts used solely in cvnnectiQn with the
cvnstrucbiors or sales af pezmanent appxvved impravenents may be
perma,tted pravided they are laGated in inconspfcuously as
possible and are remaved immedi,atelX after campletian of such
canstruction.
S. Nv antenna far transmission or reception or
televisian signals or any vther fvrm of electra-magnetic
radiatzon shall be erected, used or maa,ntained vn the praperty
autside any buil.da.ng whetYter attached to an imorovement or
otFaerwise, withvut the priQr approval o£ the Board.
C. Nv lines, wires, or ather deviees £vr the
communiCation or transmission af electxic current or power,
includi.ng telephvne ► televisian and radia signals, shaJ.l be
constructed, placed or maintained anywhere i.n or upvn the
property unIess the same stzall be cvntaa.ned in canduits or cables
constructed, placed and maa.ntained underground or concealed in,
under or an bualdzngs or other appraved impravements, provided
electrzcal transformers anc3 ather distributive facilities may be
placed on grade, but shall be attractively landscapea. Nothing
herein shall be deemed to forbid the erecti.on and use vf
temgorary pcrwer or telephone services inci.dent tv the
canstruction of approved impravements. Primary electrical
transmission lines are excluded feam the above.
D. Garbage and refuse containers shall be concealed
and cantained within buildings, or shall be caracealed by means of
a screena.ng wall of material similar to and campatible with that
of the bui7.ding. These Elements shalT be irategral with the
concept of the building plan, be designed sv as not ta attract
attenkian, and shall be lacated in the most incon5picuous manner
possihle. Unless speci£ical],y apprvved by the Saard irt writing,
no materiaJ,s, supplies ❑z equzpment sha1l be stored on thp
property exceQt inside aclvsec3 buil.ding, or behind a vasual
barrier screening such areas so that theX are not visibl.e £rom
neighboring streets or pragerty.
_g~
. ya. 112 4 PAGE ~.-~'b 9
E. Private streets, dcives, curbs and walks shall be
canstructed or alterec3 in accvrdance witn pJ.ans and
specificati.ons submitted to and agproved in writing by the Board.
A1l public stceets aze ta be c❑rzstructed to county standards.
F. No starage tanks, including but nat lzmited tv
thase used fvr storage of water ar prapane gas, shall }ae
permitted on the pragerty unless approved by the Soard in
writing.
G. Fdo mailbvxes shall be permitted on the groperty
except as approved by the Bvard in writing.
H. No air canrJitioning eguipment which is visible vn
tfne extera.or of any improvement shall be permitted an the
prape r ty unless approved by the Board in wr iting . Apprvval shall
be based upon adequacy of screening and Xandscapi,ng of such
equipment.
5.10 Curb Cuts. In order to properly and efficierrtTy
regulate the flaw of motor vehi.cular traffic, all curb cuts a.nta '
streets must be apprvved prior ta the construction by the Board
and shall be constructed in accordance witYt the approved plans
and speczfications therefor.
ARTICLE VT
MATNTENANCE
6.1 Each vwner shaJ,l maintain i,ts properties and any and
all xmpravements thereta in a raanner that will not depreciate tYae
value of ather prrrperties in SuIlivan Park Center. Exposed,
gainted surfaces of buil.dings, structures, or other improvements
oc signs wzl1 be kegt in gvad canditian, and landscaping wi11, be
kept watered, weer3ed, and free of dead materi.al. Yard 1ights
wi.1l be kept prvperly lamped. Parkxng areas and l.andscapzng shal.I
be kept free of trash ar waste. The Soard may, after written
raotice ta such of the awners who ace delanquent in this respect,
perform any work necessarcy to bring the praperty i,nto canformanco
with the pravisions of this paragraph and charge such del inqszent
owner urith the cost and expense thereaf.
6.2 Maintenance and upkeep of street 3ightzng, swale areas,
and street boulevard 1anr3scaping ora Indiana A❑enue, and
landscaped garcels at Sull%van Raad which have been dedicated tcr
5pokane County or deeded t❑ the State of Washzngton, will be
accomplished under the supervision of the Board as fvllaws:
The Bvard will contract fnr such wark by accepting, i.n its
zeasanable judgment, the lowest responsible bid therefor. The
-9-
• YoL. 1_.12 4 5 C) 0
e3ectrical and water usage costs, and the costs arad expenses of
maintenance work shall be charged and prorated tv the owners upon
the basis of the square footage of land in Sullivan Park Center
as the same relates ta the square foatage ❑f any such J.and awraed
by each of the owners. The 3oard shal.l have the right to rnake
any necessary aiteratians, repairs, vr maintenance apgroUed by
the Soard tv carry nut the intent of this pravzsian and each
awner of tlhe Prvperty agrees to reimburse the Baard far any
expenses actually a,ncurred zn carrying aut the fvregaing. In the
event that 5pakane Caunty ar the State of Washiragtvn desires ta
mai.ntai,n these areas, then this vbligation shal1 cease.
6.3 awners, for each Iofi owned within thse PrQperty, , hereby
cvvenant, and each awner of any lat by acceptance of a deed or
real estate cantract therefor, whether ar not it shaJ,l be so
exgresser3 in such deed vr cvntract, is deemed to caveraant and
agree to pay monthly maintenarsce assessments for the maintenance
and upkeep of those ztems listed in Faragraph 6. 2, above, and
such assessments are to be establi.shed anc3 caTlected as set forth
abave. 5uch dSSeSsIii4ntSr together w%th interest at the highest
rate allowed by law, cvsts and reasonable attorneys fees far
callectian thereof, shall be a lien on the lat and sha11 }ae a
continuing Iien fram the due date of the assessment. Each such
assessment, together with such interest, costs and reasonable
a ttorneys fees. shall alsv be the pe rsanal obl iga tion of the
owner of the lat at tYte time when the assessment fell due. The
personal obligativn of the Owners shaJ,J, not pass to their
successors zn title unI.ess expressly assumed by them; pravided,
however, tttat in the case of a sale vr a contract fvr the sale of
(oz an assignment of a contract purchaser's interest in) any lot
whach is charged wi,th the payment of an assessment or assessments
payable in insta7.Trnents, the owner immedi,ately pcior to the date
of any such sale, cvntract ar aasi.gnment shall be ;aersoraaTly
1iable only for the amount of the assessment vr installments due
prior ta said sale, and the new owner shaIl he personally Iiable
f4r the assessment or i,nstallments which become due on ar after
sazd date,
ARTICLE VII
REVIEW FEE AND COMPENSATIOUi OF MEMSERS
7.1 An architectural review fee shall be paid by the
applicant to the Soard at such time as plans are submitted for
approvaT based upon the actual cvsts fvr each submattal. Actual
costs shaJ.l include any fees charged by any professianal mpmbers
of the Board €ar the3.r praEessi.onal services rendered in
reviewing the praposeci plans fac any building, structure or
imptovement. These fees wvuld include the fees charged by the
registered landscage architect Bvard member, the regi.stered
a~chitect Bvarci member, and any other prvfessianaJ, Board mesnber,
such as an engineer.
-10-
• ~ YOL. 1124PAGE 561
7.2 Except as ta any fees charged by pr+afessianaZ Board
raembers as set farth i,ra Pacagraph 7.1, abave, the members of the
8aard sha].I receive no comgensation fvr services rendered, ather
than reimbursement far expenses zncurred by them in- the
perfarmance of thei,r draties hereunder.
ARTICLE VT I I
GENERP,I,
8.1 Al1 structures and activi°ties within Sullivan Park
Center sha3.1 canform to the follvwing dacuments:
A. All applicabZe federal, state, and lacai
regulations and codes.
B. Conditians, Cvvenants and Restrictivns set focth
herein.
C. November 19, 1985 Spakane County Hearing Examiner
Cammittee Findings and Drder, with attached Plannzng Report
Canditions o£ ApprQVal.
D. Su1lzvan Par1c Cenker Iandscaping master paan and
guidelines. -
8.2 Effect ❑f Municipal Ordi.nances. Police, fire and other
putalic safety Qrdinances of any munzca.pal corporation having
jurisdr.ction over any gortion of the praperties sha].1 govern
where more restzictxve than these guidelines.
8.3 Interprefiatian of Guic3elines. The Baard shall have the
right tv determa.ne al1 questions arising in cannection wzth the
guide7.ines and to canstrue and interpret the praviszvns of the
guidelines, and its gvvd faith determinatzon, canstructian or
interpretation sha11 tae final and binding,
8.4 Natice. Any notice sent by the Board vr by any Owner
guxsuant ta the provisions of thi.s Declaration shall either be
personally served or shall be sent certified maiJ., returrs receipt
requested. Natzces sha],1 be deemed given when served or mailed.
$.5 Enfvrcement Provi,szans.
A. The Board or any owner shall have the right to
enforce by any proceedzng at law or in equity aIl restricta,ons,
conditivnsr cavenants and reseru*ations imposed by the provisions
of these gu%del.ines and a similar right shall exist with respect
to recovery of damages faz any such uivlata.on. Fai.lure of the
8oard or of any owner to enfvrce any guideli.nes herein contained
shall in na event be deemed a waiver of the rights to do sa
thereunder.
-11-
• - vo~. 2 4~~~~
B. Any assessment vr installment thereof nat pai,d
withfn thirty (30) days after the due date shall bear interest
from the due date at 18% pez annum. If such assessment vr
installment of an asses5ment is nat paid within {30} days after
it is due, the vwner respansibl$ therePor may lae requzred further
by the Bvard to pay each month a].ate charge of Fifty Dollars
($50.00) ac one-third of the amaunt of the delinquent assessment
or installment, whichever is greater. The Board may bring an
acrion at law against the vwner gezsonally obligated ta pay the
same, tagether with casts of cvlTection, including reasonable
attarney's fees, and/or foreclose the Iien against tlne Iot. Nv
owner may waive or otherwise escape liabzlfty for the assessments
pravided far herein by abandonment v£ his lvt.
If any assessment eharge is not pazd within thfrty (30) days
after its due date, the Board may mai,l an acce],eration notzee to
the owner and tv each farst martgagee of a Zot whi,ch has
requested a copy of the natice. The notice shalI specify (I,) the
fact that the instalJ.ment is delinquent, {2} the ac'tian required
to cure the default, which actican shall xnclude payi,ng all
installments coming due during the period alIowed to cure the
defauit, (3) a date, nvt less than thirty (30) days from the date
the natice is mailed to the owner, by whieh such default must be
eured, (4) that failure to cure the default on ar before the date
specified zn the notice will result in acceleratian of the
balanGe of the installments of the assessment for the then
current fisGal year and sale of the 7,ot and (S) the 1egal
d$scri.ptivn of khe ldt. If the delinquent instal].ments of
assessments and any charges thereon are not paid i.n full vn or
be£ore the date speci.fied zn the naticer the Board may, at zts
option sai.fi.hout further demand, enforce the callectian o,£ the
balance of the ir~~taIlments of the assessment Eor the then
current fiscal year and a11 charges thereon in any manner
autharized 3ay law and this Declaratzon.
C. Natice of Assessment. Pdo action shall be braught
to enforce any assessment lien, unless at Ieast tha,rty (30) days
has expired fo].lowa.ng the dat~ a Natice of Assessment is
deposited in the United ,States mailr CertYfled, return receagt
zequest, postage prepai.d, to the owner of the lvt, and acopY
thereof has been recarcied in the affiee of the Spokane County
Auditor. The Natice of Assessment must recite a goad and
sufficient legal descriptian of any such lat, the record Owner or
reguted owner therevf, the amaunt claimed {which may at the
Board's optian include interest an the unpaid assessment at the
highest rate allcawes3 by law, plus reasvnakale attorneys' fee5 and
expenses of collection in cvnnectian with the debt secured by
said lien}, and the name and address of the c1aimant. 5uch
Notice of Assessmerat shall be signed and acknowledged by at least
one aaa,rd member. Far the purgases of this paragraph, an
Paccel.erativn Natice given under Paragraph B, aboVe, shall be
-12-
. ' . VOl, I 1 ~ ~ P~IGE ~
deemed to be a Natice of Assessment if recocded in the affice of
the Spokane County Auditor.
D. Farec].asure Sale. Any such sale prsvided for abave
may be conducted by tlhe Board, its attorneys cac vkher persans
authvr3zea by the Eoazd in accordance with the pravisians of the
laws of khe State of Washingtan foc judicialTy fvreclasing
mortgages. The Saard, through duly autharized agents, sha31 have
the power to bid an ttte lot at foreclvsure sale, and to acquxre
and hold, Iease, martgage and convey the same.
E. Curing of Ue£ault. Upon the timely curing of any
de£ault fcrc which a Nvtice of Assessment or Accelerati,on Notiee
was filed by the Baard, khe members thereof shall record an
appragriate Release of Lzen, upors payment by the c3efaulting owner
of a fee, ta tae detezmined by the Soardr but not to exeeed one
Hundred Fifky Dv11ars {$ISQ.[]a} ,tv covpr the cost of preparing
and recordi.ng such celease. Acerti£icate executed an+3
acknowledge~ by any twa (2) raembers of the Board stating the
i,ndebtedness secnred by the lien upvn any lot created hereunder
shall, be evnclusive upan the owners as to the amvunt of such
irac3ebtedness as of the date of the eerti,£icatA, in favar of all
pezsans whv rely therean in goad faith. 5uch certifi.cate sha11
be furnished ta any owner upon request at a reasanable £Aa► tv be
dete rmined by the Board.
F. CumuIative Remedies. The assessment laens and the
rights to fareclosure and sale thereunder sha3.1 be a.n addition t❑
and nat in substitution for all ather rights and remedies which
the Baard and its assigns may have hereunder and by law,
including a suit tca recover a money judgment for unpaid
assessmersts, as above provided.
G. Martqage Protection, Notwithstanding all vther
provisaons hereof, na lien created under this ❑ec2arata.vnr nvr
any breach of this Declarata.on, nvr the enfvrcement of any
prvvi,sivn herevf shall defeat or render invalxd the zights ❑f the
beneficiary rander any recorded first Deed of Trust unon alot
made in goad faith and for value; proyided that after sucYr
beneficiary ar some okher person obtains title to such Pcat by
judicial foreclosure or by means of the powers set fozth in such
❑eed of Trus t, such lot °shall remain subject ta the Declacation
and to the payment ❑E all assessrnents accruing subsequent tv the
date such beneficiary vr other person obtains title, anc3 subject
tv cJ.aims for a share of unpaid assessments reallacated ta a1l
lots, i.ncludxng each I,ot fvreclased.
-13-
Y~l. ~C~~'AGI a'~ ~
ARTICLE zx
AMENDMENT
The cvvenants anc3 restrictioras vf this DecZaratian shall rura
with and bind the Iand for a term of fifteen (15) yeazs £ram the
date this ❑eclarativn is recorded, aftec which time they shall be
automatzcaJ.3.y extended for successive periods of ten [10) years.
This i]eclaratian may be amended during the first fifteen (15)
year period by an instrument sxgned by Hanson and Price or their
resgective successars in interest, or, in the alternative, by the
owners of nat less than a full ninety (90%) percent af the tvta1
acreage cantaaned in Lot 1, Black 1, L,ot 2, B1ack 1, and Lat 2,
Block 2, 5ullivan Park Center, and thereafter by an instrument
signed by Hanson and Price Qr thezr respective succ@ssars in
intecest, or, in the alternativer by not less than seventy-five
(75%) percent of the awners, by acreage, af the three
afgrementianed lvts. The acreage cantained in the afarementioned
lots is as fallows: Lot i, Black 1: 82.56 acres; Lot 2, Block 1:
10.86 acres; Lot 2, Slock 2: 12.76 acres. £ar a total of I06.I8
acres. Na such modification vr amendment wzll, be effective
unless awritten i,nstrument setting farth its terms shall be
executed, acknowledged, and recvrded in the office of the Auditar
for the County of Spokane, 5tate of Washington.
No lessee, licensee, vr ather pezsors having a passessary
interes t, ather t'han an owner of a parcel or a por'tian thereof,
wiJ.l be reguired to joan in the execution vf or cgnsent to any
act taken in accordance with this ArtieZe Ix.
AxTzcLE x
ANNEXATICJrT OF AADITIDNAL PROPERTY
Addita.onal real grvperty may be annexed to the Progerty and
such additi.onal real property may become subject tv thi.s
Declarata.vn by the fallowing methvd:
10.1 Addi,ti,ans by Fiansan. if, within fifteen {15} years
from the recocding of this Declaration, Hansan, its successars or
assigns, shall r3eve1ap, ar cause ta be developed, all ar a
portson af the Remaining Fraperty described on Exhibit "A", or
other praper'ty awned by Hansan' which ].ies adjacent to the
Remaa.ning Property, then Hanson or rts successozs or assigns
sha7,l have the right frvm tame to time to add such Rcmaining
Property or property awned by Hanson which adjoins said Remainzng
Property, or any portian ar partions thereof, to the Fraperty and
to bring such "Pennexed PropErty" within the general glan and
scheme ❑f this DecJ.arativn without the appraval of the vther lot
vwners. As each phase of development is developed, Hanson may,
with respect theretv, recvrd a 5upplemental Declaratzon which may
-14-
• YOl. 1.1 2d "r PAGE 565
supplernent this DecIaration with such further and different
cavenants, condz'tions, restrictions, reservatTVns arad easements
as F3ansort magr deem appropriate for that ghase of develvpment,
provided, however, that the general character and substance of
the develapment standards of this Declarakion shal.I be cantinued
i,n order ta ensure caordinaked, compata.ble phased development of
aIi of the Proper'ty, subject ta specific develapment standards
fnr certain types of uses.
10.2 Natice of Addztion of Terri.tory. The addi,tion
autharized under 5ection 10.1 of this Artic1e X shall be made by
fili.ng of recard a Notice of Addi'tion of Terrztory, or similar
instrument (which Notice ar Imstrument may contain the
SupplementaJ. Declaration, if any, affectzng such Annexed
Prop~rty) with respeGt to tne additi.ona1 property, which shall he
exeeuted by Hanson. Recordation of such Notice of Additivn of
Territvey shaTl extend the gerteraI p],an and scheme ❑f tha.s
DecZaratian tv such Annexed Property. The fxlxng of recacd o£
said Notice of Additzon shall constitute and effectuate the
annexation of the Annexed Property desctibed therezn and
thereupon said Annexed Prvraerty shal2 hecame and constitute a
part of the Prvperty and beeome sub7ect ta this Declaratian and
any Supplemental Declaration. Such Notice of Additivn may
cantain such additions and madifications of the cavenants,
canditians, restrictions, and equitalale servitudes contazned in
this Declarakian as may be necessary tv reflect the different
character, if any, of the Arcnexer3 Propertyr or as Hansvn may deem
apprvpriate in the develaprnent of the Annexed Froperty. xn no
event, howevez', shaJ,l such tdotice of Addition revvke, nnodify ar
add tv the cvvenants, conditions, restrictions, ar equitable
servztude establisher3 by this Deelarata.on as the sarne shali
pertain to the real property ariginally ccavered by this
Declarativra. Na additirn of territory shal] substantia].ly
increase assessments.
TN WITNESS WSEREOF, the ❑wners have executed this
DecJ,acatian as of the date first abave-written.
PRICE DEVELC3FMENT CQMPANY R.A. f3AN5C}N COMPAiVYx INC.
By ~y
R.A. Hanson - Presider~t
As~
I-15-
. 1 6
14
ExxIBzT na,fl
To
L}ECLARATION LF COUENANTS, CONUITIONS AND RESTFtICTIONS
FOR S[]LLIVAN PAAK CENTER
EA5T8RN PPnRCEL 0F REMATNING PRt7PER.TY LYXNG NORTHERLY QF
INTERSTATE 90 FREEWAY. ANL3 EAST C3F S[7LLIVAN ROAI?, LEGALLY
oEScRzsED As FOLLaws ;
Bcain at the Northwest eorner of 5ection 13, Township 25 North. Range
~East w.m. in SMokane County, Washingeen; thence Sauth 89° 44' 2~"E
alr~nc~ t~e 1~arth I'ne of sai~c section 75 fest to the poine vf '~eca.r~ning
on thz East rzght-af-way of Sullivan Road; thence So►~th 0' 09 1 0 1 '"E
alanct tie Easr lirce of 5u'_Iivan Road 232.59 feet; thence 5outh
13°4Z'18"E alang the East iine of Sullivan Rv$d 170.66 feet tO °the
-.rth richt-of-wa~ line af Interst$te 90, thence North 89°50'59"E 85
~~er- t❑ the heginni,ng of a tangene cur*ve +concaue 5authwester'_v and
havine, a radius ot 632_96 faev; thence Southeasterly a3.ong sazi curve
throurh a central anvl e af 54°00' 00" an arc distance of 556.5:► feet,
t mence tanqent S4ut.h 36°091p1"Z 270.5 feet; thence 5outh 60° 46' 33"E
312.84 feet; thence Sout:-i 59° 5,11' I f3"E 951.89 feet; thence 5outlh
72°33"30"E alang the Narth Tine of I-90 I708.88 feet tv i;he Easc lirte
of the land descr;bed in tl;e Real Estate Cantract dated ~uiy 17, 1978
a~~ ~1led in the Qf!ice oE the Auditar of sa.id County under Auditar's
Fi? etlo. 78071903167; t1aencn North b° 25101"E aZang said yast ? ine
r-07. 05 feet tv the NvzGh lir,e o= t:-e South 1J2 of the Nartheast 1/4 of
sazd Sectifln; thence Soutn 89° S5' S2"E alana t::e Narth llne a~ ~he
Sauth 1/2 of the said Nartheast 1J4 I582.14 feet tra the We5[ l.ine of
r`icrm- Road; thence ,Far4h 0033.' 3G "W plone the West 1 ine ac F10ra Raac
128.05 feet to the Narth zight-of-way 11ne of the Burli.ngtan Ncrthern
Ra zlrcad; thence Nort:-i 78' 42`09"117 alanig the Narth linc aL t~e
Bur_`incton Northern RaziLaad 2734.77 feet tv thL. West 11re 0E the
llo~theasc I/4 of SeCtion 13, Tounship 25.4, Ranqe 44 EWM; thence Nv~~~
0` 39 " 1Ef„W a? on;r t:ie said Wesc ~.f ne 20.44 ieet; tine~c~ NvrLh 7fi' 43' 05
alcnc the NvrLh line of Buz' ingtan Northern Razlroad z.g~.r-af-;aay
i °.a6 feet to the East Iine of the Nortihwest 1/4 0f thL ilort°-west
1.'; o: SLction 13. :'cunst;iz 25 ATorth, Range 44 EWM; thericc :4nrth
0-Z4"06"W along rhe said r.ast iirse 20 .42 feet; thence Nvr,~h 78y 42 '04"W
alc:a~ t'Lo North l;ne of Sur' invtan Narthfarn Railraad r:q;ta1ar-waY
590.69 feeF; thence North 61' 62'04"'d 737.78 feec to tkiL!
s_e,.z:-oE-way of 5~lliwan Road; Chence Svut'.: 0°"7'0,"r 41.°-~ F=tO
t^e caint vE laeginni^q. ~
Page 2 r f Exhibi t° A"
~ BASfS aF 8EAR1NE ,
~ SURYETDAS CER'flilME ,.yM curre dafa
i;,~ g „ E.. '
~ wT,~ ~.w~~ ...=.M - : : : 3: : • ' ' . -
~ C ;l_
~ ~ w... ~ . ~ _ Y` _ ~ 1 . i.... 1......
i ~ A~ " _ ,y n• ' ~1i~~ .r. e~ ..r ri n e.nn ~c1 • _
~ ~ _ - ~ F' ,~::.~.^.-.,,a-~" I~' `r,p S: '
1 - - - - - - - - _ -~.ti._s~~=~ ,.e...._..~~:~: ~ .
~ t-----------
f ; ~ _ ~ ~;~;:;~~`~~.p z
~
' - 1l IOl areas
- - - - - - - ' - - - - :
~ ~ s ~ ~ -{e\•, , ~ ~~.r
~ i~• _ ~4+~c.. ~ i f i~r
+1~ ~ ~ ~ j . ...~o
I~ L i`~v~.°yL ~ , I
e, f g . ,~I~;~• '~2 ' 1 . .
e~ .rf. ~ l.l•~-i~~ ~ Ia
~ {~•~~Pr ~4 ' t { . . ~ .~.~~..e,
~ l - - _ jr~~6 4+~;~• ~~•s: 2 J`Y} ~'e ~ ~r M1 ~...e ...R......
I ~ ~~^.!i!a. • ~ ' 9 .
_ ~ f[~~~h~ A!i a fi ~ ~Zt~ ~"f ~.~f °1 ~v plr;YltiI ~ ~ iµ ~ ~
Li t ~ • ' _ ~ ~ti •~F~+Y:^~ ':'1:l'n ~ ~i~
!~!`l ~ •~i 1~~4~J:~~n ti' ''y_
~~_~_~_.~-a~- - arr~. ~ • _ ~~L7.Ua b - ~~~ef ~ ;rK~... ,~~-•"rs s ~
f''r,-
I ~.rr'vr '~a°pa ~ a i ~./g $y k~
e• ~ q~ry'~ L F~ ~
!r_5.~ts.._'_~s ' ^ pr
w.~..• 3 ? • r
~~r A-!x>~ v,•.~~:_~~ ~ ~
- `~ia stcr.r.~ri~~i4 y ,
w-fs1 E 1~r
F►NnL PLAr
i I
SUL.L1VAN PARFi CENTER
a pcn r rN A MMOnr vF
. T11E S 112 Qr SEG 11, NI'Y 114 SEC I,', NE 114 SEG 14
, Tt71i711SFi1F' 25 NO!$7}!, Rd1V(E d 4L-A5 7 4i'M
SFO14AIVE- CIXJN7Y, YS',4SNIh'GTflN
CLAIiE17CE E SiMPSQft Er+GileEEPS IrIC
~ i$tfEEr foF zi H 908 AAGpNNE RQA6 P}i 976" 372
!iPOKAl7E, WA5{417FrF0N 94712
i
m....a.a.u.a..~. ~_..~L.~.~ LL-,~,.~w , _ . - _ w.___~-A_ .
Ni
~
e • p
l
i
i
e
4108688
Fige: x of 1
~ntca 061C411941 11•.5U
rEC uj m a.,}~ r, xi
iar[EREAS, Csantor ws.shes to develpp reCail shoFPin3 .
facilitses on Lpt 2, Black I of SU].Z.ivar1 Park Center, and
AFTER RECOADxHG RETQRH I'U:
WF3&REAS, Spakane Caunty requfres, aS a e[sndition to
deveScapmenC of [.nt 2, Tlr_cck k of ths subject prnperCy, thaC Drev M. Badker
Grantox provide an eassment Eor connrruceion and maintenance of Atrgrney at Ln.+ 44p8686
a SCOCm water dra3nage pi-peline from Che prapoSed develqpment 4n k401 S. CrAad 'B4vd. 1026334 Iayr: S 41 i
L.sst 2, E31aek 1, Co the vtarm watec detenti6n pvnd fnciiity [a Sgokane, wA 49203 0610411991 11`%l
Iocated on S.ne i, Sloek 2, abave-sieecrihed, a1S of which wi11 vm9 sie iss m GA.- r91
'daeneftt Lnt 2, F31ock 1, SulZivan Park, an9 ahich wi11 enable
eranear and crantor•s eurceasorc An incergat ro enjoy ehe
bene[i.ts s+C said storm water drainage pipeline and dees,ntion pand
facility,
pocument Ti,tle; DECLkRJ1TIflH OF DAAT1a1tGE PIPELINE 8A5Eh18
I Craator: Nansosa Industries, Ine., a washingtors t
N048, THEREF45cE, isy coaasidsratSon of Che premises and tHe Ccrrpuratian '
mutual benekiCS to be deriVed hereCo, it zs agreed as #pllvws:
Crantee: iianson IrduBtries. Ync., a Washa.ngCen
1 Grantvr hereby declares, grants and conveys a eagement Corparation
twenty feec {20°} xn uidth aver, under, an and across the abovee AblsrevabtCd
described Loc 2, II1vek 2 and Lat 1, Rloctc 2❑f SuZlivan Park IL i.egal [7escriprion: Loc 2, Slack l, and L.ots 1 And 2, S1oek 2 ~
Center, substantially as showra ssn Exhilait "A• aCkached hereto and Sullivan Psrk Center
3tiCqrp6rdC@d herein by thxa reference, ar se ulri,mately cvnstt`ucted, with the center line nL said ZQ' wide eaaemerlC beirsg Parcel N4R. 45116.4102; 45115,0202; 45115.0201
the actual locaticaa of Che drainage pipeline, as censCructed.
2, The &COrn1 water draanaqe p5peline 5ha11 De ConsCruCted I7ECLA'RILTION QF LIRAIHACE PIPBLIN£ FhSZMEXT
and maintained at the sole cosc and expense aE Grantar and/or
Grantor•s succeascsrs xrs anterest. t3y akAowing develppment basesi
upon thI s easemerte, 5pokane CotanCy iQ not aecepcing
ryqpos»ibflx[y far maintai»xrag tlic drar:iage ptpeline dcscribed Ttsis Tieclarstion of tirainage nipelxne Easbment (the
herein, nor is Spakane Cnunty aceepting any respansihili.ty for -sasemene^) , is made and encered into thrs 29th day at wsay, 1497,
arry damage wfiatcoever, f.ncluding, bue noc limited to. tnverse by It1N50N aNrivS'rRP6S, TxC. . a Washingcan corporaeion, hereirsa[ter
cpnderrnation to any properk3es due tsx dePS.eienL conatrsse[ion or referred eo ar5 •Crantor",
maintenance of the stbrin water drainage pipeline.
W I T N S S E'I' N:
3, Use ❑C that portion of E.v[ 2, BSock Z. Sulaivan Park WIlriiRnS, Gr.-Intor zEl tlie owner aC certnin real prvperr-y
Cencer, as sbave-described, shall :ipe be issconsiatent uith r-he locaLed in Spcrkane Coun[y, Washangton, iegally [lenc[ibecl as:
Conditieans of Appraual fvr the 3ullivan Park Center P1ae on tile
with 5,pokane Caunty under Cile PE°1504-85.
I,ot 2. 8ibtk 1, and I,ots Z arld 7, Block 2, SLfLLIVAN PARK
CENTEIt, ag per plat thereoY recarded in Volume 19 ❑f Plata,
4 All of the promises, covenants, teisns and canelitioas of pages 25 ansi 35, Spokanc Cbunty, weahingcvrs, nnd
• this Easement shali survive any conaeyance, and thfs Easemcnt
I]8CL/lR7iTIaN 6F I]RFhIPFAGE PXPELINE EASEMENT ~ f7ECLAR7ITTOTI f7F DI~AINAG£ PIPELTN& E115SM8NT P. E. F~tCiSB7~[FJCpftt~ f~
~ Spokane Caunty FrOject ¢ao II97449 ~ Sp4kane County Prvject No. E97649 0~9~J"~L ~J79~ /
Page F j~., ~+age 1 5~2na C[x2rrtyT~
~ ~k
l
,
.
. ~
' • s
. ~
$100666
Itg:• 3 ef 1 I
410$688 06104I1991 11:30.1
.~v~o + - ' I_ ~Igt: 3 Q~ + ~R C1[ t11 M ~sti ~A 6 !
CiC ~ [sl !ri 991 ii•sm E%H1~IT ~A" ` ~r~`• shali extend to and txind the successors and aaaSgns OC the
Grantar. ThSs EasemenC sha31 rurs witts the Yand in perpetuity.
~ $ x
x n~ Zry WgT11E5$ WfiERSOF, the undersigned hss exeeuced this
° 7. t* instrumenL aa o€ the day ansS year firsC aDave-mriCten.
~
ri
~
z }SRN50N INDiJS`!'RTE3, TNG.
gY
R.A. Hanaon Preai.den[ ~
'M.~. rr: ~ •
r
STATfi C]F WASiIING'S`pN ~
~ ;r~ ~ l Caunty ❑f Spokane 1 1
pij t}~is .y day of ~~GAd 1997, befoxe me, the
undcrsigned. a Hotary FuErlia xr~ anc3 Cvr the Staee of ~lashi~gton.
duly commissioned and swvrn, personally appeaxed R.A. fianson, tn
me known tv be the President oE ltanaon Induatries, InC., the
, r: ;,°r 1 w cvrporatron thac executed the foregoing 4nstsument, and
~ f;:• • acknowledged the said 'a.nsetuMent [0 be the free and vpluntax'y aee
and deed of snid corparatSvn, for the ueea snd pur'Pasea Cherein
J ~ I menti.oned, and nn oath stated tha[ Sie is authorixed to exccute
J~ ft+~~i s ` fthc Aaid inoCrumettt.
n ,f
r.'[ ~ f r • w1tnt-3rs sny Iinncl Rrtd olficial aenl E eta aCCixe :the day and
w• IV ~ year €irsc abave urxtten.
/rl:'f QfsEVJ 1", 6L'DKCR "
taatary Pu4i'.xc i:i and tor rhe SCate
r~iti r {r 5i&1{ U' 4V,1`,'l41FlGi0N ❑f Washingtvn, Fieniding at.~
kQSi% r;I::IC r"fY APPoinemenr Expireea rr2xv
r
~ _ . .
~
. ~
DRArNAGE PxPELINE En~~ENT
~ $pG+kane County Praject ~7a. E47049
Page 3
~k-
4108689
i ~ ftgt: 1 at 5
%re411997 11;0 `
err~u ta tn m e,A .a1 rA n
AFTEFi ItECORDINC RE?URN TD: ~
Y]reu M. Sodkex
Attornoy et Law
1401 S. Crand 81vd. 9203N
Spokane, s+TA 99203
_ `-'_"__i
Dncument Tiele~--- "QECLARIr'PZt]N ~OF ~515pRM~wA'!'ER 17HTSNTTON Pf3trO
FACIL7TY 11NA h1AStJ'i'8NANCB ACC85S 811$fiMFNI
Grantor• ltamsesn Induatries, Inc., a Washington
CnrporaCion
;
Crancee• lianaan Industzies, Sne., a Washington
CCrrporation -
AYik7reviated
Lega]. Deserigtion, Lot 2, f31as9c 1, and Lata I snd 3. EiJ.ark Y
Sulli~an 1'ark Certter
(Eu11 lrgal an paqe z o[ document)
Parcel hias. 45116.0102; 45116.CY202; 45115.0201
AECI.AfL#TIs]H ON ;TOY3M tiRTER I?ETY,NTSt3H PCiND PACILITY AIYD
MASNTEHAriCE ACCESS EASM4E7'!'
Tni.s Dec7.aration at 5torm water fletention 8ond Paeilaty and 4
Maincen~%nce 7tccess Fasement {r1ie 'Naecment") . is made and entered
into this 29th day o# May, 1997, Ay ?PJYNSf3N IN4USSRIGS, XNC., a
Washington cerporatian, heseinaPlter reCerred ea as "Grantar', `
f7 T T H 9 S S E T 1I : WIiERCAS, Csancrar fa Che awner pC eertain real pro,perty
2acated irn Spakatse CQUnCy, Ftashingtan, 3egally descrihad so:
Lcst Z, 81ack T, and T,ocs 1 artd 3. B1vck 2, SU4LIVAbt PARK
FL E. Fatr3sa Tux aemP►
MATAPI'EMAIVCE 11CCES5 EA5EMPNT Qaie7zl1Z- Yt 19 4~~
3pokarte Cs]UnCy Prc,ject T7as. F347049
~ i gpokans Ccun►r7re
Page as.
d
;
,
-;a s.~~ • vx"' '`~'k
~ , wv~-.
s}+
+={x~' tu,` 1'R4-~~'~~~"~•'~'..p .atC`~^~' a- n~R',r~••"a'~C~'
t.' ~r ~Y
~ '~j.E'~,s<[ti~^~~~s.•. . f"4'• "kia~y~' i]
~ .
i
4108689
Pjye; 7 of 5 ' 9108689
051Q1~1%I i1:5(14 ii¢a: t of 3
Fl[ 459 M s,~.~. r. n WWq 0510411991 II.#
a. Use of tt~at prrtion of Loc 1. glvck Z. ahave-descrihed, +e su m tns,~. r. n
sha1,l nac Ae tnennsas[ent w1Ch the Canditiong 4L AppLoYAI for the ' CENI'rft, as per plat tliereof recorded in Yolume 19 oi Placa,
SuPllvan Park Center Plai on Ei.1e with Spokane County under file ~ gage& 25 and 26, Spokane Cflunty, 67ashington, anc9
PE-xs0n-8s.
~
~
S All the promises, covenants, terma and cQnditiAns o[ ~ Wt3EREA5, Grantor wishes C❑ deVelop reCail shvpping
this Eaaement sha15, survive any ❑vnveyance, and thia Basemene facilities on Lat 2, Block l of 5ullivan Pazk Center, and
shall extend to arsd bind the aucaeesasa and assigna oP the Grantar. This Easement shalY rvn with the land in parpetuity. WxeREAS, Spakane County requires, aa a cdndition t❑
develapment of LQt Z, Block 3 0f the ssab?eet prnperty, thnt
Grantor provide an easement gar eonstruccian and maintenanee of
TRI WT3TIESS W1IERSOF, the uneleraigned hae executed Chia a storm water tleCen[S,on pond tacilit}r on tot 2. AJ.ock 2o!
inetrument aa of the day and year tirat above-wriCterx. SulliWan Park iCersCer and also that GranLOr provide an access
eaaement for access maantenanee` putposes tp aaid starm vaater
detencivn pond, whfch easements wili benefit Lat 2, Slock 1,
r Sukli.+ran Park, and vhich srSll enable Grantac and Gsantnr•s
. suCCessara in interest to en7oy the benefxts oC said sCOrm waCer
11ANSDHI ITri7t13'I'RIHS, INC. detentxon panc9 and the access rights for maintenance Chereof, '
NOW, T1fCf~CFpRF., in cmnsideratzan af the Faxemisen and the
rr~ r.t mutual henefits to ~aa decivec3 1iereto, it fu agrecd an L~ollrnaa:
1t.A. lianndii - Yr~u c~enC ~
1, Crantar herehy declares, grants and coaveys a easement ~
, for the psarpase ❑f cvnatructing, improving, repairing, cleaning
and maintaining a storm water detentiQn ppnd arross, over and
STATE OF WASI[INGTON ) upvn that pprtiors of Lpt Bl.oek 2, Su113van Fark Center, ae
1 as, legally described pn exhibfe •A^ atCached heseta and as showxs ❑n
County of Spokano ) ExhiDft "8" attaehed hereto, whiCh Exhibits are incarporated
berex» hy tli3c rePercrsce as t}iough fv31y set Pnrth.
On tihis p''A day of 7c~nQ 1997, before me, the
undersxgned, a taatary gublic in and far the Staee af Flashingtr+n, 2, GrantQr Eutther decAares, gsants at5s] crxrsveys an aecess dud.y commrnissiorsed and aworn, personally appeared R.A. }ianson, ta easemeiit fac in9resa ana egresn, oa, aver. and scrvss s pnrt£rars
nse knoaan tn be the l're5ident p[ Hanspn Tndustries,' Snc., the pC Lot 1, Block 2 7ncS LoC 2, 03rsck 2, S+,illivan Park Center, which
corpox'ation Ch3t executed the f e~rego~ng in9erutnene, and `~`L1=3B e`LU~='II~=lir 1°= al`~o legally elescribed pri LxFaihxC "R" and is
acknowledged the eazd S.nstrument eo be the free and voluntary sct shown ❑n Exhxbit ^E3^,
and deed ❑f ea3d corparation, Cor the usea snd pL4Tpc79e9 thsrein 3, The ~rorm u~ter detentxan
meat~.oned, and ❑n Rath stated chat he zs autharixed Cp execute pond facilxties anr3 the
the sazd insCrumenC, access easemenc sha13 Yae ears::[ruceed and tnainCazned ar the sole
' cost and expense aP Crantor and/or Grarstor's successors in
Witrsess my hand and o[tSc3a1 aeaS 1ee [s~ at~~,x the tSay anA ~ 1nterest 6y allowing der+elopment hased tspprs these easementa,
year farst ahoWe wri~tren_,_ I Spokane Cosanty as not accepting resppnsibility !or maintaining
` the actess easemenC br Ctie storniHater detention pond taeilitses
DP,Ew M. PGpK[R descrabed rierein, nor ia Spakane Councy accepting any
SfkTC D~ l1A"~iiS~CipH ~ reaponaibility fvr any damege wRuemeever, SncludSng, but nr~C
~ Naeafry PLhlic in and for~the Staee I 1S,mited to, fnverse condemriatxan ta any propertiea slus Co
10PAfi i[: I p= paaEin;ngton, [teoiging ee .+~c+sx~ defieient eonstruetian or maintenance of the s[orm waeer
L5 C' 1 My Appointmenc Expires; r•r'+•w deCention pvnd.
~ : , . i
~
I
P4AItd'd'ENANCE hCCE55 EASEMEHT ~
Spflkane Cvvntp Prvjsct Na. 897049 MATN7'CNANCE ACCESS EASEMENT
•
rr Page 3 Sgekang County Fcoject No. 847049
Page 2
. i ' .
1
- I ~
II
~ • " 4108689 ' - - 4108684
ged ~
96fit941P 11:5~1 ~ 05 ~1i99T~~11:59d
~ ymA q7 M wJw fw 11 QIfry6A FiG 117 m fnnS.an Pe R
E%HIRIT "R" E]tI{ID17 "A"
4' ~ €
IHLFACSS-CpRLSS PASF!h1Chf[i.CR I. [SlDC'K-1:
An [nZ1t1s-P=ren ewmctii orei i6ir rmfFw oiT+r 1 Tllnek 1 of olu I'fal 0[`51)1 [lNAF! TARK CNNIL[i', as
rccwdrJ ua Ikark l9 of Clsli, A+tsa 25 IrtJ 16, In W.pt cointlr. w..ai.jiom, dexsTrd tt [all&m:
Hrtln AI il" Praihr+esl ir.esf of xabl inl 1. Wnt Ihe L*aglnnlaR ol a rnrve cvnssre ie dxe S+ulh"u s716 I JOiClns
01 13i7 D] kci a ad a r.41.1 1"o 4n=af N]7'7iS'yS"W; drancz Snulli ra unly. [hrdrah z rcniral iatlc of Sw 13 0 hmg iNe ikrih I ibl,e ni r+1{flll&y line of {nJttar Arswve. P a o it diraere rJ l]ld.l; lecr in alte rns of nnrr;
.
tlscnLY 5 3'07171 "L', +fun; pf+F ItRY I s, 374 15 krt ha a tnrasr Wwcrn [a[e fomd 1 of SaL1 Iltxk P; ehence 1
- - - . .
- ' p '
NJS'St'SSr1, aSme a ltne 4sneeen m6J i.eis iseJ 1, 79 0 kce fo in aa~k rrdnt In miid 1?nr, lmncx
5 i8'I2'Q3`C, sionl, Ihe cua~nun linr Ixlwetn s~IJ Lms Cand 7, Y]5.49 frel lo ihs Tive ~'dnl dI tlel{selny~
m
r-p---'-'--.-_i~' iheaee N SD`]IP]]"H [1.11 kn ie tlre brdinnlna uf 1 cuire mnn+e la ihr 5nnlh wiih s i4cliuf d I10 W[zet;
f~ ~SsepceHa+Flu~sl~tt~,[h3m~~4►renl~ilanelsutil`Id"%'~>dncdlun~cenlli'U4fltclh,thtln3vutlGsewill) a
line 6tsvTal H]]'y8'11"1: truu olwint ~ Iht rmim~i Ilne lslmea uPd [dt 1 ae~i i, 199.51 {rel haa thr7rsm
~
` Y~ 1"u4al of IkltinnfnF; tlianr¢ S 7]'311'1rw ao oa r:n &.+1.1A1ao ~„r. eo n~. Swth wiHe a ej&uSvf ~
4U.Si4 f.tf wrd s++Jiat 1-68 c1 i1 33'71'3]"1', thewee Sehi[hr.[fletfr, dsrn.;h a tepleil ~nt1e oP?S'7i'1¢`. aw
`
.fe4.unrs of 775 30 fsel in liw esd uP r•-; qla..re S}p']0'9]° W 6[i0 Fec( La aSae eannnm 26e1*1-sw nld
II • ~ ' j' ~5. ~r luu 1 snJ 2; lhswcr H 18'21'07^ W 70 74 7eei ta nW1 rer ['dnf nll3rQfnn4n~, '
~ • M
iHCRrss-raterss EAseAtrwr LOT 1, rEe.OcK.i
~ f i. ~a An InC.ss: rtiesa ra~rn.rx~ e.er rLar r"slw ni 1.4 S lUurk 7 of ehn Mil oI "SUIa.IYAH CARK C7'H7TR°, ~s
~ ~'!t• •,~.`5' fr iecvrdsJfnik;iA[1J9f1'IatLS"drs]Saed 76.1. 31r44neCounir.Wuh6tian,defexil+rda+1441vws`
]ltyin al tlrr Nnitawcsf mrnle n! sa4f daf 2; ILtnct S 49'11'03°Q itani ilce Ntxdh pne nt file file 5, 731r9 rcci
i++ d.e'lrue Nkhl nf IYlrlnriLlg: I}t[peC $30'30'31-LY 44AR (tFl If, II,a S.~,iH fln. nt 0.1d p.A t in,l rr4.i .w Q -
f •nrrc .mC~+e i~~ ilyc 5~..1hwe•i whh p eedlar of 9Y] ix! d<es nd aisilF.C Ixa~ln~ ++i N~94"1S'7R"1~; Wrnee
i Swtl~eax1nlr. Iluaugf, 1 rsmeaR . nitie nf l`29'L4". ,alrenR saL! S.HA4 tlne, aa Fre dLae.nr¢ rd ]u[U 1erh, Ihenrr
T
H iU'3~}'73'r, M+ avn I.nSral [Ine, 4761 drn NlLa Nwrll ile. ota.ld [iW 7, Il.+sn H 411 '2Z'15~'W 7~J Ii ferl
7111}1[ ,)IM[ r61n1 eI Iktinn1n8
t ff
uiuiHncE r.AS11.2.1errr tl r
n d-.Enae= 11,31 Fn.ikn ui 1na I 111~Y sW i1,c tW.r of -sui_Uvnrr rnnK cr•.:iRcia-,.~ teowildsa
14 Iltuk Nu( 19~ts, ~a;cs ZS InJ YkIry SlitAurto C-Lnti, LY:d-inatun, JctariWd 31f41[n"• .
Ikpin aI fl~c A!n t6wrsl eaner ot mi1J LU I, &Ini ehe LsginnlnE ot a nrrrs mrtn+e la 01e $o.nfiwut wifi a tulius
h ~ ~;j,~'~ u! Ifd7.~lfel anJ ~ ar41~s1 crculnt of H 13'20'30-W: iLran SnN2111:..irrlp, ikrwt'h N cenu.l .nx1Q ef 50'17 W.
~
e ■Iw{ tles HnE4 rilLt o[ war [it7vi] linr af 9ndlan. Arenur, .a orr dlsi.nss n1 1156 14 frrI ia the <ad o! ne"e;
S 33`03'eL'E, lmn& 1+14 RRV q.e, 371.75 kri ia. sinq.a 4owsen lrn 1..d 2 ai s.ld 111c..k 2, ihe.rs
N34`57'77'11.21~1; . linc b-ea IaW dsAa 1.nJ T, 7609 fres la .e sntla Mr.lni In S.W Gac: Uu.ce
s ee•irarr., i,wnz M. rinctima., nR. W"t. f.iJ iwr i..J s. a+s.no rin Io she n-: rant 6r Vemsaiai„w
ihtnr,c eunsfanlwy 5 48'7I'133'E 4 Id [cri !o I. sniiit rnlnf Ix ui11 eommen tine: elreAte S 37'413'14'F- $lo.t 114
~ j ! I mmman li+: k..l.nca fal3 Ixis E u+d 7, 09 OO lsrt, eLewct H]]'7S'a7'C 127 73 [rrl w Wa Norfh llne dIWIW Im
di' rr l:6hsaCa [f 37'16'08^W, Oaailha Hwah Ilns o(aeIJ Lw J. TIO.W f;CI Ip IM1a IxEIppIMrL pI / N[,i [OnRK 19 FI-i
tea+ehucl +rith . r.diu+ of 7671 10 trGr, Ihr:n NaiLrrWnly, ehewah e eeMcil eazle rd 11'2719'. .SOnt IAr
'N.rth li^s cl 1.41 tarl V. im aiC dI3IlqCq 4t 424.74 t[[t 4Q Ws IIIQjSttj6Ml Mllb l IIA! LLiIIng rI j3'5E'11"1! Jim
Ilta'J jva Pulat ig fktlaaln6; Vhta[e 3 ]}'S8' irW l]I33 te4 la ika Taup FdAI o1 Ik=1nf.Fn='
~ y---•
FAX CDVER SHEFa
SPaKAPIE CCJUNT]C - ENGIN$EFZS 3rd FLOaFt
FAX # (509) 324 -3478
PHONE # (509) 324-3478
1026 W. SR4A17WAY SPOICANE, WA 44260
PHQNE # (544) 455-360[}
DA'Y'E: 1 May 95 FAX 926-1323
TQ : ChiaCk Sinapsan r P. E.
CQMPfiNY: SimpSnn Engineers
CYTY/ST'A'Y'E :
NUMaER QF PAGES (INCLUDING C[?VER SHEET): 1
FROM; _Yd Parrv. P_ EW [Plans Review, x257]
SIIBJECT. P1504 - Sullivan Park Center
Fee AgrQeanent
MESSAGE/SPECIAL INSTR[ICTI(7NS :
Per our telephone conversations on 3 Mar 95 and 19 Apr 95, a Fee
Agreement (signed by the Developer, ax a duly authorized agent vf
the Developer) must be received by the Cvunty gngineer' s Office
{I]evelopment Engineering Services Section) before the start vf Any
review af the plans and calculations for the Indiana Avenue
improvements. A Fee Agreement has not been received as of 28 Apr 95
,
z
i,A• .
F
C]FF S CE OF THE COLJNTY ENG I hIEER
5P[JKANE CQUNT'f, WASHII'+IGTC]I`1
. February 13, 1995
30: SFOKAIVE GOUNTY F'LANNING DEf'ARTMENT (Current Planna.ng
Administr~tor)
. ' . y
FRI~M: SPdk.AiVE Ct7LJIVTY E1VG Ti~1EER ` ~~1 •
~iJ~i.7: _
re; Skibdzvzsa.-ryns
The C"c-onty Engineer has reviewed the a!ten~-Lon of tzrne and has no
add-Lta.onal e_omments ba add c-sther than thc-sp- deonda.txons ,-if rerrord -as
as ~.~mmendedM When detailed drair,age and riDad plans are Sl_►bmitted
they st'ia1 Z Lrmply w.iGth thre Guidel-Lnes for Stormwater Mar,aQement and
SpoN ane i:,ounty ~ad St-zindards as amended.
~ .
~
S I- L7 IC r<~ 1V L i._,1 i-4 ' 1' l°
1'C.AtaPNIIVG L7EPARTMENT . 4VIYLF.1Sl] @-IUiill,rl,ftiJ, []fM.C:T`OId
• mEMORANpUM
`Tir3: Spokane Caunty DivisiQn of EngrneeTing a.nd Rvads
Spokane County i7ivision of Utilaties
Spokane County Healtta Distriet
Spokane County iDivisian of Buildirigs
Fire P'rvtection T]'astrict x ; Consolidated TrrigadQn I]istaict " L
FRt]M: ]ohn Tvdd, Planner u
D1`YTE: DeS'.embeT ily 1994 ,
SV'BJELT:
T#re Spokane Caunty Planning I]epartrnent has received the attached request for an
Extensian of Time to finaliae rhe plat of ,PE-1504-85 SUI,.LIVAN PARK CEN'TER.
If yvu have cvmnnents vn the pro,pvsed extension vr believe additional cvndidons shvuld be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, piease forward cami-nenzs to JOIIN'I'O@D
by December 20, 1994.
Tharak you.
c: R. A. H`dF15QZ7' +Go., P. CJ. &vx 7400, Spokane Wa 39207
I7revv Bodiker, 1401 S. Grand B1Vd, Suite 203 Norrh, Spokane Wa 99203
Encpasure ,
~
WEs'r 1026 I3RoA[awAx AvEtavE •'SrOKnNE, tqnsIirraGTaN99260-02,10 •(,509)456-2205
SPQKANE CC)UNTY 1'LANNINC: 13EP'ARTMENT RECEIVE~
PRE LiMirvAR~ PLAT OCT 03 1994
~XTENSxvN vr 7 IME FORM
s+'v+canee cou,~Ty
PtAnru~Nr "PAR 'nvervz
Plat Nuinber: PE 1504 -85 Plat Naxnc: Sul I iXAn_FjjLk i;enj&r
# vF i.vts: 42 # of Acres: 226
-Spozisvr: _A,R. Hans~n Camgapv. Inc. Qwner.
Address; P_Q.8Qx 7400 Address: P.O. Box 7400
ciiy, 5tace, z;p:$L1QICaCie. Washi ncitvn 99207 City, statc, Zip: Saokarre. Was}hi naton 9920`
Phone: f5091__4fiZ-_QL70 Plione: (5Q9)-j,70
EngineerlSurveyor: _LLgrg,~nce E. SiJ~ps_ot1.En9jnppT:5. I,nc-
Address: N. 909 Argonne Road
City, 5tate, Zip: Spokane, Washi ngton 99212
Ptzvne: 9 25-13 22
Z'IIASCD PRUJECT
('ZO BE CUMPLEIE❑ QL[LY IF"i'1IE PI..AT 1S BEING DEVEL[JPED AND FINALIZED fN P11ASH5)
# of lats orTginally approaed: 42
# vf phases fiiialized tv date: Phase I has received f i na1 p] at apprvva]
#of Ivts remaining ta be f nalixed: 38
#Uf aCreS remainil7g: aPproximately 93
PLEASE COMPLETE '1'IiE FOLLOW'ING iNF43RMA`i`IC]N:
° Briefly summarizc tlie prvgress made, ta date, %n preparing tlie plat to ve fiiializcd (i.e., pllysical
canstruclian, bonding fQr improrrennents, survcying and dratting work, acc[rniplishing various
departmentttl requiremen[s, obtaini:ig or granting easeiiie:i[s, ctc.}
5EE ATTACHED LETTER
~
v ,
DA TE E4['PLICANT1S[7RVEYOR
Drew M. 6odker, Attorney far Rvpl icar t •
PLEASE RETURN 7`IIIS FORM ALCJNC WfT)l $170 EXTENSIUN o~' "TIME FEE.
~,.PI' P , (~-l- *k- `~e 1'~ 1
[
09/18197 14:12 FAX 5094688454 HANSON INDUSTRZE ~001
. ~
F A C 5 I M
To: ,t.~~~~ ~erto, L.S.
Of: 5pokane Caunty Public VVor[ss
Fau: 324-3475
Pages: 2, induding this caver sYteet.
QaGe: September 18. 1997
Here is your copy of the signed around authvrizataan fetter,
-yyl
~
From the tlesk ef,,
' Salfy Mc Gavran
Real Estate 5ecretLrp
PD Box 73 10
5pafcane, WA 99207-03 I(l
509-468-7 I (}2
Fax• 509-468=8454
08/04/97 14:26 PAX 50946$8454 HANSON INDUSTRIE zOQ1
. ~
F A C S M I L E
TO: DaVe BeI'ta, L S.
OF, Spokane Caunty Pukalic Works
Fax. 324-3478
FageS: 10, incfuding °this caver sheet.
Date: August 4, 1997
These are the signed around copies fve your files. Pfease ncrte that on ane caF the documents they
agafn charrged the amourrt tca a lesser number. I have also 5ent th,e letter of explanatiQn that we
receiVed.
~J
Sa9ly Mc uran
From t?re desk o{ . ,
Sally Mc Gavran
Real Estate 5ecremry
Pp $ox 73 10
Spvkane, WA 992[]7-03 10
5()9-468-7 I [32
Faa.509-488-8454
❑7125/97 10:51 FAX 5094688454 HANSON INDUSTRIE z001
. ~
F A C S ` M ~ L E
I
To; C7aue Berto, L.S.
a. 5pakane Caunty Pssblic Warks
Fax 324-3478
Pages: 10, induding this taver sheet.
pate: July 25, 1997
4need to come in and get yvur signature on the enclnsed documerrts. Please r_all me at 468-7102 ta
set up a tirne.
Hanson Industries, lnr.
C~-
5aily Mc Gayran
FrQm the desk of..
5ay Mc Gavran
RQal Estats 5ecretiry+
pC7 8ax 73 10
5pokane, Vv'A 99207fi310
509-468-71 a2
Fax- 549-46$-8454
06/30J97 10:49 FAX 5094688454 HANSON I"U5`I'RIE RODY
F A C S + M L E
Ta: aave Berta, L.S.
Of: Spo{cane County Public Works
Fasc; 324-3478
Fages; 3, inciuding this cover si ieet,
Date: June 30, 1997
Dear Dave:
Iarr-i enc9osing twa more County Fund ~ =scraw Rccaunt ietters over to you for your review. Please
calf when yQU are ready far me #o comr : in and get your signature on these letters
We wrll not be here rn the affice July 3`d (Thursday) or July 4~'' (Friday) sa 6 hope we can get this done
before then. If you have any questions 1,fease feei free to call me.
Sincerely,
Hanson irrdustries, Inc.
~
avran
Real Estate Secretary
From ihe desk ot „
5ally Mc Gayran
Rea! Estate 5ecretary
PC? 6asc 73 10
: pokane, WA 99207-0310
509-468-7102
Fax 549-458-8454
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINLSTRATION
WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMEN'T OF TRANSPORTATION
Interstate (SR) 90
Evergreen Road Interchange
Concept Design Report
March 1989
~
~
.
4
~
•S
N
~ONA1. ~
,~~s87
TABL$ QF C0NT$NTS
PAGE
DESCRIPTIDN ~ 1
EXISTTNG SITUATION AND PROP05AL 4
DESCRIPTTON OF PR4POSED DESIGN ELEMENTS 8
TRAPFIG VpLUMES 11
LEVEL DF SERVICE ANALYSTS 13
AccEss cauTAav za
, sAFETY zo
RFGHT-OR-WAY 21
ILLUMINATIaN 21
FUNDING 21
APPENDICIBS
A xNTERCHANGB ALTERNAxZVES
B WSDOT CflRRESPONDENCE
C SULLIVAN ROAD INTERCHANGE RAMP MODTFICATI0N5
APPRVVED PLANS
D LEVEL DF SERPTCE CALGULATIDNS
,
d
- JEC~ ~CaTtUN
~ PRp 1
o i
u. ~
~EN
. 290
~,O• .
GULW 1
o Z ~ -...~=1 . ~
< IP
90 A~•
~ Spqp,GUE
. ••-,,v:
~ o
~ Z
pcc cr.
1
. y2F z > Z °
~
, a J = C
3
• 27 ~ l
~ W
Y
~
~ t
.
MtCA ~
A ERSOTATE ERCHAj4GE
INIT 046T
R+GREEN ED E~E P RpPQ~ V~C~Nr TY M.P..290.98
AP
~
1T
. j i
. _r- .o.....
~ e ol . ' e
EMPiRE.a',',. ~..~NO~THERN ~ Water Tank
7- f ~ • r ~
. 1993 Grev T I.
`•240. ~~~,i'~ ~ WI _ ~
Well t '
' . _ ~ t~, ' ~rr~a'~w .
7 . i9B~ Trent : yo $uC teliOn ; • -
~ . • . 3eh ~~s
~ I, O
. ~ 1994 mm"017
~ .
010
°2"a~ - . - . :
~1I ooZ
.~...-:.„......=1
•t~ : ' I p~ 1(p r~?+ ~ r~ ~ ~ X Borrow
y D P IA Q P Pit
N,t~J4 N
ZOOIJ~ , 9-W2``~ i•~ ~ ~ J
(n • . l ~~~r,__..r ~ ~,-.--Z ~ '
C wT . t~ ~,~,f`~~... \ v ~ ' ' ~ y
~ rn 3 i o
- . • - r-=~ _ PROPOSED EVERGREEN INTERCHANGE 'PROPOSED INDIANA AVENUE 12
Trniler rIr l '•.a1. ~ ~
BOfIOw~
m • ~ Park
ICT L e0n- SPdKANE- lNTFRNA710 ~PitY~ I 1~l,•.'rij
Z IIUI UL - r~~ Rt~N~TO~~~ ~~a I ~ _ = ~ ~ \ ot• ~ _j v::.~~ t ~/~~'~.i?'{~ ~
~ r ~ -4 LANE~ - ~ ~ - • s°luy ~ ~i' ~
~ , • ■ ~ ~ II - ~ T . - - _ `:A~~~e~~~ c, ~~~.•J~~/~•j ~
iSStun ° • o • • -I , ~ - tl~ fr:.
Park ~
1 ~ • - • °°c. ~`'~url~J I
~ • I f f~'~1 .~-toco n--=~ _ T\
v
~ ~ .,tG?► - M~ssron r---~-- ~-.u-' • :f _ ° ~~ll~ ~ (AgAk~ • ~ ar • ~ _ ` :
, ~Spoka eVall - ave ~NEpJ'
~ ~ ~ '^~1~__~ y~'~• Ho~ ~ o•~Ir °eeo ~ _ •
~
> rn rn • - OONE~? o.' ZAvE _20SB r • ~ ~ / - ,
7 '20<7 y y ~ . I t ' I I ' \ Q . ` ~ . ~ `\~I ~ . . ~ ` ~ .
~
`
,
t A .
. . .
.
- ~
- ~ ~ •WT . ~ S7 P z:~CU_!.~-
W,
~
Z ~ • , .
~ ~ j ' ~~~o;'~ . . ~ 4lake~ > ` ~
j
~ 1-__ ~ ~f ~ R ~ Sth ~7JI ~ ~ • 2052 • J 7~ ~
j'
O ~ ~ 1 6 Norlh PROnOWnv 2076 13
0 Jr IhQh S h . W la • ' . ~ ~Nl ~ a :1:. . . : .
tieh
~ O soL♦ ♦ vWAYI
t-j* ~
IQtb Su 5 • •?029 •I.~ ~ e ° ' 11 . ~ , ~OPPOR~UNIT ~ ~ ; ..w , • .,•.vALLEY • o . e . • : o WA
1
Z 000° 6 O. _ . . ~,._i;~ o• • .a N:° Adal
SPRA
I a AVE 'r~i, 020 • '~is~ ~;,e" q ~ . n~ . •
OUE ~
P ` 7 f~ .-t - BIANE.~ _1 . j~~:P7•~ . I o
~
~ . • 7~• ,2 ~ .I1 ~•oe o20/6 a ...:'~.r,l.O . ;'G '.•~c~~:'•~• _Trrl
~ . ir■. ~ ' - ABANDONfD ■ I ~ _ • ~ •
8,
•2000 ' r' ° +oo . - , . ~ 119
f-~I . , r•'ll .r , -
i:~r ~ 1
4TH / . . • 'wVeN ~ ' ; r.^;r-~,, ~°•i: N - ~M~rve
'~i • 1~._. . Gr8v
9Ch~
~ r UE.' • I.7(X)6 ~ . i ~ ~ , .I ~ . ` JJ • " ~ ~
r .l~ it .~i~~•~ :Y~j: ~~~:j..•.s~~l.~ .NII ~.t.•}iT~'~I:e I .1., AVE
~ E'~i •'r• . o~ Q~ 20/s f1 , . - ~
_ ~ ' - . !7f..' _.i_ I ~.CKe7eboe'._.•_.~'. ~ ~e et~~ ' •~i ~Y O.Y~ 0 1~• • _i,
U.S. DBPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION '
PEDBRAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
(region 10)
AND
WASHINGTON STATE DBPARTMENT OP TRANSPORTATION
INTERSTATB (SR) 90
PROPOSBD EVBRGRBEN INTERCHANGE
(@ APPROX. SR 90 M.P. 291)
Description:
This project would provide for the construction of a full diamond
interchange on Interstate 90 approximately five miles east of
Spokane, Washington and nine miles west of the Idaho State line.
Spokane is a community of 172,000 which serves a population of
355,000 within the greater Spokane County area. This interchange
will provide a direct connection to a proposed extension of
Evergreen Road between existing Mission Avenue and the proposed
Indiana Avenue extension. See Pigure 1. This proposed
interchange is intended to relieve traffic pressure and
congestion at both the Pines Road Interchange (SR 90 M.P. 289.86)
directly to the west and also the Sullivan Road Interchange (SR
90 M.P. 291.92) directly to the east. The congestion at these
existing interchanges will be created due to projected
development in the vicinity. Development of the proposed land
uses north of I-90 on either or both sides of the proposed
Evergreen Road extension, see Figure 3, are included in the
proposed Sullivan Park Center. Sullivan Park Center is a mixed '
use retail/commercial and office/light industrial development
including a projected 1,135,000 square feet of retail space and
900,000 square feet of office/light industrial space. In
addition to the the preceeding uses approximately 750,000 square
feet will be retained as open spaces and parks.
The construction elements of this proposed interchange will be as
follows:
Diamond Tvoe InterchanRe:
o Signal controlled ramp terminals.
o A 175 foot long structure crossing over I-90 carrying
the proposed Evergreen Road extension.
o four ramp connections to existing I-90.
o Weave lane between the Evergreen EB on-ramp and the Sullivan
EB off-ramp.
o Weave lane between the Sullivan WB on ramp and the Evergreen
WB off ramp.
o Addition of appropriate Signing and Channelization along
Interstate 90 as required.
PAGE 1
z
~-'-~1~---~ ist-- ~Im ~ r~~i _ _ •
~P,~p•r~ R _ I ; , ~ ~ fr~lf,~ ' r ~ ~ ~ : ~j' ' i ~ _ • .
p
~ i ~ 3~ ~ ~ ,~jl~~f ~ ~ ~ . i r ~ ,
_ ~-f','~ ~ " ~ 1•-~ ..'.r ~ i - .y'-_` ~_r--. ~ - _ 6 _ ~ _
~ C3l
i a~?~~,3 a, J~ ~ i
~ C 'rU ~ ~ J • ~fiY~jir f I'f ~ + J ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ R . 1
~u ~ '(i f~' _ ._.r.. ~ I . - ~ , a~ ~
! fr r f1
Eveftc~t IF
_ `i ~ ~ , ' "'~~~~~11 • ~ ~ ~ ~ n~i
~i~j ~ - ~
ll~,~lfll!~,}
!r1r;ry
A
1 ~
~ i~ i ,Z10
~ r~ `•'J i r r ;
~ ~ '0 ~ +~~j ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ r . I `~i~ ~ ! W ~ • . _ '
~
~
~ 2 T x! N m
~ `I l~f; i I f 1 I,~~~' • 7'i~ m m ~ q~ f^
~ ~ i~l'f~~l r~P 1~ ~ r~I C • 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9~~c
h7/
o -i
•r' I~~~r` j~l ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~ ~et ~ , s s
~ ` s~ . ' ~~r 1 ? ~ ~ •
i ~1 ■
x
i ri
2060 ~ - _ _ - - - - - EVERGREEN INTERGHANGE
PROPQSED • -
EVER+'aREEN R[]AD
, - 2e5n _ - ` t - RROFILE
~ 450' V.G.
- f ~ _
Y ` .
2040 T O_`' f
9
4
z
300' V.C.
2030 - - LU ~ EXISTING 1-30
xi 1
LU
a 4
x ~
aozo ° ~
~ ►
. ~
Z - L,
x
' 2(~bfl 0 a ~
~
~ E7CISTlNC ~ cc 300' Y.C. a
~ GI~OUND PRDF3LE 1 w ~
2000 J~ ~
z
~ 'c
~ W
~ . VJ
t~ CL qr
- 1990 - - - - . m CL SCALE:
•~ORiz s°=ia•
' MINiAAl1All CLEARAlYCE H
ALLOWEO = 16'-6" ~ 3: Qow % VERT 1^=aoo1
7980
WILSEY$tHA1VI
PACI1 lC
1984412th Avenue N E
1970 L r~ P,i). eaz C-973114
Helfevue. ►vA 9S6U9-7130
8+40 9 1o 17 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
STATIQNIIVG FIGURE ,S
Surface Streets:
o Extension of Indiana Avenue between Pines Road and Sullivan
Road.
o Extension of Evergreen Road between Mission Avenue and the
proposed Indiana Avenue.
o Signalization of the intersection of Evergreen Road and
Indiana Avenue.
o Channelization and signing of Evergreen Road, Mission and
Indiana Avenues.
Egistine Situation and Proposal:
Backgrouad
Interstate 90 is an east-west freeway facility consisting of four
basic lanes within the proposed project area. At the present
time a DEIS "Spokane, Interstate 90: Four Lakes to Idaho State
Line" prepared by the Washington State Department of
Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, issued in March 1988 proposes expanding
Interstate 90 in this area from four to six lanes, three lanes in
each direction.
The proposed Evergreen Interchange will be located approximately
5000-feet east of the existing Sullivan Road Interchange and
approximately 6200-feet west of the existing Pines Road (SR 27)
Interchange. Each of thes,e existing interchanges are of the
Diamond type with signalized ramp terminals. Both existing
interchanges have been either modified or reconstructed within
the last few years to provide additional capacity and improved
Levels of Service.
The issue of access to the site shown in Pigures 2,3 &4, has been
addressed in the DEIS "Sullivan Park Center", issued in June 1985
by Spokane County. The DEIS contains a letter from the WSDOT
Headquarters Location-Design Engineer S.A. Moon to Mr. H.R.
Hammond, dated June 21, 1984 which requires various construction
efforts to provide access points along Interstate 90. These
access points are to correspond with various phases of
development of the land uses shown in Pigures 3& 4.
Part of the required access point construction is to provide for
additional modifications to the Sullivan Road Interchange
northern entrance and exit ramps. The Design Report for these
modifications to the Sullivan Road Interchange has been
previously approved by the Washington State Department of
Transportation. As outlined in Mr. Moons letter full development
of an additional access point must be provided or the "other
interchanges in the area will breakdown and, thus not be able to
provide the appropriate level of service to the traveler."
I
PAGE 4 ~
I ~ I r ~
LEWQ~
l11P19'aKr! , ~ ~ )
4b~r Nmn wm Ve
• P~ T-
~r~.. EmV vppya~
~ -~Qa F4C1
~ss f - - - . _ . ~ - l-~- _ .4
ZEE
, - ~ ~ _ _ 1 - ~^,Sj ~ J'~
:L L ~ ~ ~.s
o ~ ~ l ~ - ~
E]CiSTiNG CQNDrriQNS MAP
SULUVAN PARK cENTER
~e County, Washn" corsuftan- t: ►►'dse, & Ha„
Figure 2
` T v
~ ~
r" ► ,
~m
~ Q° ~
df FI
1 ~ I Ni
~z l
i
y~.~
j ~
il i31:~'11 14`~,
' f 1i~1`
~ r4~''~~~'
a i t ~
. Th
•r'
~ 4j" r Fr, ~
i
~ ~ ~~w -
~ - • . ~R~ ~ . ♦ t , - ' . y ~
LEGEMD~
~mP lt[6~bNnr~ Ms~{My~F~~~~illrm~5wx'~~
6b[&!'h Awyf ~aw~ urmltll ..°e6 ,y~py~
1 Y 0 1zs~llAmes L! Caw~uh'haWn Fi
d A A A[tbtlarsl C~vslAy~[~1 W
4 f 7 !f 0 Cammern.l { Q~fy~~~n a-1
~ ~ E 110 Ay{y1aes4 A C~~IAy~y~pa,~ CA
a C i 11 0 4ew1 Euurs S6 Ca-wry biifbea B-3
G 37.(( kssoxan Lc}Kk4E RI biajmla3 pAq
~ ionl I•~
y~ I1[ G:
-r` ko- ~~r~~~ '~~3} -A" - ` -
` ZaNING
S1LUi~'►4N PARK CENTER
~
Spokane countv, wkrniXjtDn cons,ltarrt: wlsey & Ham-
Figure 4
. 5 " . r
In addition to this letter the DSIS prepared by the WSDOT and
FWHA not only planned for the expansion of Interstate 90 from
four to six lanes but made provisions for the construction of
this interchange at Evergreen Road. This step was taken by the
WSDOT so that all anticipated improvements a'long Interstate 90
within this corridor would not be subject to duplication of
environmental approvals on a per case basis. It is expected that
supplemental environmental documentation may be required for the
Evergreen Interchange.
Description of Proposed Design Elements:
All design elements for this project will be designed in
accordance with all applicable Spokane County, WSDOT and AASHTO
standards for highway and roadway construction.
Diamond Tvne Interchange:
o Signal controlled ramp terminals:
These ramp terminal signals will be fully actuated eight
phase traffic signals designed and installed using the WSDOT
Design Standards and Standard Specifications. They will be
interconnected, not only between the two ramp terminals but
with the signal at Evergreen and Indiana if required. They
will have Opticom Emergency Vehicle detec[ors installed as
well as detector loops cut into the ramp asphalt and cast
into the bridge structure as required.
o Evergreen Road Structure:
This structure will be designed in accordance with AASHTO
regulations for bridges and structures and will be designed •
for a HS-20 type of loading. Structure width will be in
accordance with WSDOT and AASHTO design standards and will
accomodate bicycle and pedestrian use.
o Pour ramp connections to I-90:
These entrance and exit ramps will connect to an existing
facility with a design speed of 70 MPH and an operating
speed of 55 MPH. These ramps are expected to be single lane
entrance/exit ramps with a 24-foot cross section including a
minimum 14-foot driving surface with paved shoulders of
8-feet and 4-feet. Additional lane width will be provided
as necessary to accomodate WB-63 design vehicles. The
divergence length of the ramp terminal is expected to be at
a minimum 115-feet long measured from a the edge of the ramp
which is at a minimum 6-feet from the outside travel lane.
The ramps will be in a• vertical curve due to the grade
separated design which will shorten the required stopping
sight distance. The ramp terminals will intersect the
proposed Evergreen Road at approximate right angles to
maximize turning sight distances. All ramp curve radii and
superelevation rates will be designed for a ramp design
PAGE 8
speed of 35 MPH. Ramp connections at Evergreen Road will
be designed to match traffic volumes and WSDOT and AASHTO
design standards.
o Weaving lanes: Weaving lanes will need to be added between the proposed
Evergreen Interchange ramps and the Sullivan Interchange
ramps to the east. These weaving lanes will be 12-foot wide
and maintain the existing superelevation configuration of
the existing freeway, as well as ~the existing roadway
cross-section to minimize future maintenance costs. The
existing paved shoulder will be relocated at the same width
to outside of the added weaving lane.
o Additional Signing and Channelization:
Signing and channelization on mainline I-90 will be
installed at adequate advance points as required per WSDOT
standards and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). The signs will be designed per the WSDOT Sign
Fabrication manual and installed per the WSDOT Standard
Plans. Channelization will be provide in the ramp gore-
area, along ramps and in the weaving section in accordance
with the WSDOT Standard Plans.
o Location:
The location of the interchange, approximately 5000-feet
from the Sullivan Road Interchange was considered the best
alternative to minimiZe impacts exisitng homes and major
well sites within the immediate area. It is desirable for
the intersection of Evergreen Road and the proposed Indiana
Avenue to be as far west as practical in order that the
seperation of that intersection from the interchange can be
maximized. Indiana Avenue will be located as fare north of •
the interstate as possible, but is constrained by an
existing active railroad line.
Surface Streets:
o Extension of Indiana Avenue:
Indiana Avenue will become a dedicated county arterial and
will be designed in accordance with the applicable Spokane
County design and specification standards.
o Extension of Evergreen Road:
Evergreen Road will also be a dedicated county arterial
which crosses I-90 via the proposed above grade crossing.
Within the limited access area of this interchange Evergreen
Road will be constructed in accordance with WSDOT design and
specification standards. Outside the limited access area
this arterial will be designed in accordance with the
applicable Spokane County design and specification
standards. Evergreen Road is currently a mostly rural
PAGE 9
2-lane facility. However, Spokane County has planned to
expanand this existing roadway to create a major north/south
transportation corridor. Their intentions are to provide
relief to Sullivan Road corridor which currently is
operating at it's capacity.
o Signalization at Evergreen and Indiana:
This signal will be a fuily actuated eight phase traffic
signal-interconnected if required to the ramp terminal
signals. This signal will also be provided with Opticom
Emergency Vehicle detectors.
o Channelization of surface streets:
The surface streets will be signed as required by Spokane
County and the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
o Other traffic control:
Traffic control devices will be installed at other affected
intersections and streets as warranted in accordance with
the MUTCD, Spokane County and WSDOT standards.
~
PAGE 10
Traffic Volumes:
Tra€fic forecasts were prepared fa~ the future year 1990 and 2000
' as gart of the DEIS "Sullivan Park Center°". These forecasts
cvnszdesed the cumulative i,mpacts of traffic growth on both a
daily and peak-hour basis. pue ta the Caming for this project in
_ cvnjunctivn with the graposed land use deVelopmerxt vnly the year
2000 traffic fvrecasts wil1' be applicable. The foZlowing tab1e
sutnmarizes Che histari,cal traffic data and the year 20(]0 traffic .
forecasts ifl the vicinity of the grogosed inCerchange.
T11BLE T
TRAPgTC YOLUME SUMMARY
, INTERSTATE 90
ADT v d PM Peak ►r h
- 1483 2004 1983 2000
I-90 east of Pines Rd 29520 12550
I=90 east of Pines Rd EB 1640 3$95
I-90 east of Pines RD WB 1270 3360
1-40 west of 5ullivan Rd 29520 52300
1-90 krest of Suilivan Rd EB 1540 2875
I-90 iaest of aullivan Rci WB 1270 2355
Existing EB an ramg @ Pines Rd 2050 4$64 400 440
Prvpased EB aff ramp @ Evergreen Rd 4700 425
Proposed E$ on ramg @Evergreen Rd 4435 538
_Exxsting EB off raiup @ Sullivan Rd 5100 147$0 550 909
$xiseing WB vn ramp @ Sullivan Rd 5100 12195 554 . 1025
Proposed WB vff ramp @ Evergreen Rr3 5300 477
Propvsed WB ❑n ramp @ Evergreett Rd 4304 522
Existi,ng WH off ramp @ Pines Rd 2050 4$60 410 450
Traffic frvm the devQlvpment of the propased land uses on the
site shvwn in Pigurea 3&4, w,ithvut the constructian of the
~ prvpcased Evergreen In,terchange, wnuld be distritauted eo the
existing transpartatian network approximately as follows:
PA~E 11
0 67% of the generated trips would utilize the existing
Sullivan Road Interchange and proposed Indiana Avenue.
o The remaining 339~of the generated trips would utilize the
existing Pines Road (SR 27) Interchange and proposed
Indiana Avenue.
The DEIS for this project and the WSDOT traffic projections have
identified that the existing Pines Road (SR 27) Interchange and
the existing Indiana Avenue intersection are currently being
underutilized and would be capable of handling the additional
traffic that this development would create. However, the
existing Sullivan Road Interchange would not be able to absorb
this additional traffic without the transportation system
surrounding this interchange breaking down. The turning
movements for these intersections with and without the proposed
Evergreen Interchange can be seen in Figures 5 through 9. I
ii
PAGE 12
Level of Service Analvsis:
Interstate 90 Mainline and ramAS:
The following Level ofService calculations for the year 2000
assume that I-90 has been expanded to the proposed six lane
configuration, and also that the proposed land development has
been completed.
TABLE 2
LEVELS OP SBRVICE
INTERSTATB 90
(pm peak hour)
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LOCATION Present 2000 w/0 2000 w/
Evergrn Evergrn
EB I-90 Pines to Sullivan B C
WB I-90 Sullivan to Pines B C
EB I-90 Pines to Evergreen c
EB I-90 Evergreen to Sullivan C
WB I-90 Sullivan to Evergreen g
WB I-90 Evergreen to Pines C
EB on Ramp @ Pines B/C B/B B/B
EB off Ramp @ Evergreen D/D EB Weave Evergreen to Sullivan C/D
EB off Ramp @ Sullivan B/C C/D
WB on Ramp @ Sullivan B/C A/D
WB Weave Sullivan to Evergreen C/C
WB on Ramp @ Evergreen C/g
WB off Ramp @ Pines B/B C/C C/C
~
PAGE 13
~ o
'o N
~ ~ .
219 we Ex~T R
qMp
(Y 97
o ~
~ M CO
Q T
O/~
4L~
Z
>
J
J
~
Fe v~ N co
EX/r r ~
qqMp
v
. s92 ~ .
593
~ I
A
LO co
CO N
~ N
T
Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
At Sullivan Road Interchange
WILSEy&HAM w/o Evergreen Interchange
I PACIFIC with Proposed Land Uses
,
1980-112th Avenue N.E.
P.O. Box C-97304
Bellevue, WA98009•7730 Figure 5
-
co o
!O r
~
~
6~e Fx~r R
~ 8 qMp
G~ 82
o ^
N
e., N M
~
Q
0
cc
Z
>
J
J co
~ N
RqMp
n b 409 ~
S~0
~ I
4
CO ~
r O>
N ~
T
Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
At Sullivan Road Interchange
WILSEY&HANI with Evergreen Interchange
I PACIFIC with Proposed Land Uses
.
1980-112th Avenue N E.
P.O. Box C-97304 '
Bellevue, WA 98009-7730
Figure 6
h ~
a0
v
4sa ~e Fx~T R
~ qMp
- G~ 23
L~
a °D
G t°
Q
O
oc
z
W
W
cr
C~
~
W
~e FXir A
qMp w M ~
v
42S ~ .
1QO
CO N
a ,n
M
Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
At Evergreen Interchange
WILSEY&HANI with Proposed Land Uses
I PACIFIC
1980-1 12th Avenue N E. F19Ure 7
P.O. Boz C-97304
Bellevue, WA 98U09-7730
C
Q
. O
oc
za
J N Lo ~
J
~
N b INDIANA AVENUE
v
~ 8s
a ^1s
~ aas
394 ~ •
Zs D
855
~ I
~oLo
~ N 4e
r- Cp
PHF = 0.90
Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
w/o Evergreen Interchange
WILSEY&HAM . with Proposed Land Uses
.
I PACIFIC
1980-II2thAvenueN.E. F19Ur@ 8
PO Box C•97304
Bel levue, WA 98009-7730
C
Q
O
m
Z
co
> M° ~
N ~ -e
J
J
~
N ~ b INDIANA AVENUE
s1
Q 140
~ 373
394-'V 26 a
360 ---,,A I
, Q
0 o u~
tD N et
PHF = 0.90
Year 2000 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
~ with Evergreen Interchange
WILSEY&HAM with Proposed Land Uses
I PACIFIC
` Fi ure 9
1980-112th Avenue N.E. 9
P.O. Box C-97304
Bellevue, WA 98009-7730
As can be seen from Tab1e 2 the develapment of the proposed Iand
uses withaut the eonstructivn of the 8dergreen Interchange will
sesult in lower Levels of Service to bath the E$ exit and the WS
- entsanee ramps at Sullivan Interchange, The resuiting Leve1 of
SerVice as C/D and AfD respectively. Far the EB exit ramp the
through traffic would haVe aLevel ❑f Service C and an exzting
LeYeI of 5ervice D. At the WB entrance ramp the thrQUgh traffic
wouZd operate with a LeveX of 5ervice of A while the entering
traffia wauid aperate with Level of Service U.
- The addition ❑f this interchangs would imgrvve the eRit and
- entrance weave tn Level of Service G, and stabilize the through
traffic Level of Serwice tv C between Evergreen and Sullivan.
- Due Ca the anticipated higher distrihution of traffic ta the
5ullivan Intezchange the Levels ❑f 5ervice surrvunding the pines
Tnterchange are basical3y una£fected, this can be seen in
Table 2.
5urface Streets: The Levels of S'eruice calculatians far the ramp terminals at
Evergreen and Sullxvan, and the Indiana and 5ulliuan InCersectivn
can be faund in the appendix.
The intersection and ramp terminal Levels of Servzce have been
summarixed in the table be1vw.
Far the fvllvwing table it has been assumed that all of the
prvgased land use develvpment has been completed.
TAHLE 3
, L$VELS dF SERVICE
SURFACE STREET INTERSEGTI9NS
AND RAMP TBRMXNALS
(pm geak haur)
Level of Service
Intersectias yr 2000 w/4 qr 2000 w/
Evergreen Evergreeai
EB aff Ramp and Sullivan Rvad F (61.1 s) B(14.I s)
WB vff Ramp $nd SuXlivan Rvad E(42,8 s) $(I2.2 s)
Tndiana ana Sullivan F(95.1 s) D (39.5 s)
EB aff Ramp and Evergreen ----y---- C (21.6 s)
WB off Ramp and EvergreQn $(?4.9 s)
PAGE 19
~ 'As can be seen from Table 3 above, the development of the
~ proposed land uses shown in Pigure 3, will have a very serious
impact to the operation of the ramp terminals and Indiana
intersection along Sullivan Road. The most serious problem would
occur at the Indiana Avenue and Sullivan Road intersection.
Without the construction of the Evergreen Interchange this
intersection will operate with a Level of Service F with an
average stopped delay of 95.1 seconds per vehicle.
This poor Level of Service is reached due to two specific
causes. The first cause is the through traffic volume of 1505
vehicles per hour heading southbound, this traffic is
non-development related traffic. Additionally there are 1100
vehicles per hour attempting to make a left turn from northbound
to westbound at Indiana Avenue. This traffic volume is
development related traffic. It is the high volume of Ieft turns
which the construction of the Evergreen Interchange will have a
direct impact upon, as a predominate share of these vehicles will
then access the site development via the new Interchange.
The improvement in Level of Service to the Indiana Avenue and
Sullivan Road intersection from LOS F to LOS D with an average
stopped delay of 39.5 seconds represents greater than a
50-percent reduction in delay. This is directly attributable to
the construction of the Evergreen Interchange.
Access Control:
In the vicinity of the proposed interchange, it will be
necessary to provide for limited access in order to protect the
capacity and integrity of the ramps, ramp terminals and the above
grade crossing itself. No driveway access will be designed or '
permitted within the boundary of the limited access area. The
limited access control limits will parallel the ramp terminals
from 100 to 150-feet and extend north and south from the ramp
terminals along proposed Evergreen Avenue at a minimum 100-feet
beyond the ramp terminals or as required by the WSDOT. Even
though this project will be constructed with private developer
funds access controlhearings are anticipated.
Safetv:
Without construction of the Evergreen Interchange, Sullivan Road
and Indiana Avenue will develop safety problems related to the
over capacity of the existing transportation system.
Construction of the Evergreen Interchange will redirect a
significant amount of the overflow capacity and thereby reduce
these congestion safety problems. At this time there are no
significant accident problems on I-90 in the vicinity of the
proposed Evergreen Interchange as no access exists. However, the
construction of the interchange will create weaving movements
PAGE 20
I
which do not now exist. The impact of these movements has been
mitigated by proposing a weaving lane between the new Evergreen
Road Interchange and the exisiting Sullivan Road Interchange.
This weaving lane will create an additional lane for weaves and
acceleration which should provide added safety to through
motorists on I-90.
Rieht-of-Wav:
It is anticipated that the right-of-way lines will be located in
the same location as the limited access lines. Most of the
right-of-way within this area will be dedicated to the WSDOT by
the owner of the proposed Sullivan Park Center property. Smaller
segments of right-of-way will be acquired by the State or by the
developer with assistance, if necessary, from the State. The
right-of-way area is intended only to deviate from the limited
access line in those area of cut and or fill where modifications
need to be made to catch all of the slopes and drainage. The
area within the right-of-way will be fenced in accordance with
the WSDOT requirements.
The right-of-way for all surface streets will be dedicated to
Spokane, County bq the property owner. However during final
design for the development certain portions of right-of-ways may
require easements be written for slopes,drainage,sewer pump
station, illumination, detention, landscaping, etc.
Illumination:
Illumination of the ramp terminals and signs along I-90 will be
illuminated as required by the WSDOT. All other project
illumination will be per Spokane, County standards as applicable. '
Punding_
Funding of the proposed Evergreen Interchange and the
accompanying surface streets will be per the developer of the
Sullivan Park Center with a possible sharing of costs by others.
PAGE 21
ALTERNATFVE Nfl. 1
Thia alternative allqwed fcar adirect cannection to the existing
' Missivn Avenue and Bvergreen Road intersectfos. Hvwever, thi,s
ogtion requi,res Very steep grades and exCessive fi11s on
Eaergreen Road ta the new interchange. Thia alternative alsca
wzli affect the existing water tvwer ar►d we2l field due to the
excessive falls.
I
- - - - - - - -
AqE. _ . . .
53;~5Ad~
L231N,Ra4E , IYAI = -
`-TF[SANA RYH. • . - • - - -
- ~ • ~r ~ ~ r ~ {
I
. cl
dd
~?~x.e v - I • ~ ~ = t
SR9[1 " , ~ _ ~ ~s.
w .._•NOR4 6VE ~~.wm vm,~.
, ~ y ~~S':.~ , ~ , _ '~1~__ , _ " ° ~ .
•r,'.' -
135an D7_r~ i • ' ~ _ ~Ri ' - - f
~ ~ ~ f~~~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' 1_ ~ _ A R~ r ' - _ . _ 1 -
i ~~~~r~~ - ~ ~ ' ~ _ _ - - T.
:~~1^~ -'~c , •..r„~a~ ' w 1t`~ ~
_.o • ~"a ~~-s. Cz ° • - „ - ' '
- ~ ~ ~ ,~y - _ ~ _ _
i ~t . ~ ir~~ , - m, ~ ~ ` -
..r . , r M1 -P ' ~ ~ ` ^ ~
- r-y- ~ ' `r~~. ~ ~ - '_r~ _ :
~ . - ~ ~ ' `~s - ' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ k ~ ...~~~'Q' ~ ` - ;~y - - .'1~':ti
~ ~7 ~j o ~ ~ • ~ r ~ = ~
` . , 1. -'-^~~i=.._~ ~ _ - • _ 4 - V~`'~ _ ~ R,w -
a
G-
~r ~ ~ .r L J ~ ~ ~ ~-~~'4~ •
~ - ~~~~~i• _
r„ • -
cz~l ~
i • ~ , --~.~-r-ma:._~y.
~
, _ [ E - • ! : ~ ~ t 1 t ~j~~`,,~ ❑ 3 a~~ ~ y
WId,SEY&HAM { ~ .,.a Y - . W ~ sn sa ssaxawE! cOUw~i-r
FJC EVERCREF7+1 9~7£F~CHA~iGE
' PAa
_ mao-4izce~~e g ,
?a aM e-vrW . . _ . „ _ yAL7'Ef?M11VE ND. 1
~~.~m- - . _.:v.__~_~ -
ALTBRNATIVE NQ. 2
This alternative allvwed for a direat conneetioa to the existang
Missian Avenue and Evergreen Rvad intersectivn and dves not
affect the water tvwer or the we11 field. However, this
alternative places the new interchange to far to the esst and
much claser to Che SulIiuan Road interchange than necessary.
Also this aYignmsnt wiii cause site problema far the prvpased
, Su11iVan Park Center deVelopment.
~
- , , ~ ~ 1 ~T: ~i ,
rR"~~~
,~~3~
~ ~ ~)1, ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ : , ❑ '
~11 ~~~f
~;;t1~i } ` ~ ` ' • , ~ ~
~
QF~
o;
r ~'~tllll t - ~A • ~ ' ~ ,
~ i~~` ~H~,~_ ~ ~~','~k I1~'►~ _ ' ~ ~ .
► e ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~
s ~
n i ~ ~ ~ ~'~~~'f~ ~ ~ 1• .
`~g~`' ~~~i~1t~, ~ - r•t ' - , -
~ (dl'i~ ' ! f I
o
b
~,~~,;~Nt
!r ~ •~1 ~ ~ ,1 , ~ _ ; ~ ~ ~
q~
~',t(a O
~ ~~:ai t ~ E~~ " . I ~ ~
~ ~ • ~ j ~ t ~
'i+ l T ~.d ~il~.tl3~'~, I•,' ~ ~ ~ ~ tl ' j : f+ ' ! F9L4n
~ 5~~(+~~~~ ~ r ; h'• i ~ , , ~ ; ~ 1 .
~ ~ t 1 tt ~ . . S . -
1! (1'~~ ~ ;1 ~8 ,i
~ ~ .
ALTERNATIVE NU. 3
This alternative dves not alIaw far any connectivn ta Mission
Avenue frvm the praposed interchange. As in alternate no. 2this
alignment and configurativn wvuld place the interchange to far to
Che east and create sxte deveivpment probFems also the ramp
canfigurations shown are more costXy and require additianal
right-af-way tv be constructed.
. " i ti - • . ' _ ' t
' fNQ1PKP
'i29N.H44E,tY.K ° ~ .
_ - -
~ • T•..~ r-- ~ ~ ~ v '
~ .
- -
sR '30
~ . _
. . s _ " Ye:` ~ -
-Fd9RA RVE
_ • ~ ti rl' y,' " ` ~ ; ^
. ~ ~ ; i , ;i ~ ~ - : , ~ ` ~y • . _ - ry'"^-.~- - _ _ •
~ ~-^w-~ ~ • `
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - • " - _
. y,~;-~ti~ r'^c'==~ ~ ~ ' " ' a. -u:~--••=-_ _~1
_ . ~ ~ • ~ " ' = ~ - ~ • ~ - - -
_ ; _:t~ 1 c'-• _ _ - _ . -
. - • ti--~•~~~`~=' °`--"~~~~f~ ' - • _
- ~ • - - s~-'
N
• +7 ~ - ~w'~~~ '
9.
r ~ ~ ~ 5 V `~`~y~- ~T _ •`x:_=="_- : - „ - .
c~1
[
: ` 1 ^ ~~_~i-~ ` _ - E7 q~~
LF rj~ ~ [.t~`~.- ' jF "'`~.d~•~ "~-'~"'-'"'L.M1, ' ~°-.w -ti. -
Q
y~, ~r ~4
~i{~ ~
C9
~
~ • - ~ r` ~~d~
CJ
"JVIISEURM[ Y~ ~ , ~uK.~ • ~._.~--L7 ~ 1~ ~ sa so sMKArvF cOLWn
~M NTMCR"GE
EVER
P~4CIFI~C
is o-~i3~nR~,~•n e ~ AL7'ERMA7NE IVC}.. 3.
ALTBRNATIVE NO. 4
, This alternative allawed far a direct eonnection to the exxsting
Missian Avenue and Evergreen Rvad intersection. Hvwever, Chas
option requires very steep grades and exesssive fiil$ vn
, Evergreen Rvad to the new interchange. Thzs alternatiVe also
will affect the existing water tnwer and weXl field due to the
escessive fills and alignment. As in alternate nv. 2this
alignment and configuration would place the interchange to far to
the east and creaee site development probTems also the ramp
configurations shawn are more casCly and requixe additional
- right-of-way to be constructed.
0
~ t$
~~aF(7~ • I ~ r~~ p ~ ~ _ ! ,
. . 1 ~Ij {ktAk?° Rx
;l' ~ • p ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~Irt.•;~~~ ' A 4~ ' ~ ;
yr 1.
•~r.f.+7~,J~~~ .~_r ~ ~ ~ ? ~
,
~ ~ u ~~;~'"I fif~l' ~ 'r";I • ~ i '
E+rEpraEEe,no,_`-
LJ1 ry+'ll~,~ tI kl} Ft J J ~ i
I!1 f ~ P
k+'~lj f~ L4
AE
~r + ,~.I ~~f,~•J~~ -~J ~ . ~
~
~ P
•
14
. ?~N~ ~ • ; f
{.,'i 1+~ _ In ~
sa
Z + I~ ' 1•~ r i ~ c ; ' ,
E.>
~ ;~u.~f~
~ ~ - ,~il+,
-
• ~ri f1; t f]~~ ~r 9,
~ FR ~J
~ I I ~ ! ~
ALTERNATIVE NQ. 5
This aTternative allowed for a dixect cvnnectivn to the existing
Mission Avenue anc3 Evergreen Road intersection. HaweVes, this
aptian requxres ❑ery s~eep grades and excessive fi11s on
Evargreen Road to Che ~ew interchange. This alternatiVe also
wi11 affect the existiag water tnwer and well fieZd due to the
sxcessswe fi11s and alzgnment. As in aiternate no. 2 this
aligr►raent and eonfiguratian wDUld place the interchange to far tv
the east and create site development prablems. The ramp
cvnfiguratipns shown are more costly and require additivnal
Ti$ht-of-way ta be Constrsacted.
' I~pSANM1
' . . ~
Z251i,R.44€,SYM - • •
__'r---- "--"1NOSAHA AYE
~ a• a. r.:
. r-
Qr
SR9Q_
. u• A~ ° ~ _~`~x'"~~_~ 5 ° 1
' `FDAA AVE ~ ~'~~'w . ~4 - ."`r~ r ' -
= : ° v f ~ =1' _~e~ ' ~~~u~• _
. . ' ~'``1_ e_~ c~ `r` .
13 j~~~-7 ~ ~ ` _=~~L •~w -•_•»-::rt~:~_~--- - ' •••_`-~s~. ~ ~
~ zZ::' ~,~1 r~i..~~~,.~-~• 4 ,r~' 1 ~ \ ~rr.~. . v•-- ° _ ._w r
=
~ ex+~.~,.., ~ . ~ ' ° ~ - ~
~
~ ~ F ~b .t_ ~y`_~ y~(~ ~ ^ ~ ~ r. _
v
v~ • _ ~L "~-1 ~'~,~1 P.~~
~
~ `~~d~g,•`--~11~~.~._-+~, , _ ' r_ - - 1
~ :,a--~}~' _ ' _ ` ~ Q
4~t
j nenE~ ~
~,f~ ^~~-x„L ~==_~`y~ --`y'~- ~'~,`r~'~
_ ~ ~ s u~ - _ Q~ ' - ~ _ y~~Y~ •Y ~ ~c ` -=e-=-=----'
i ~ ~ l~~~-~~~' ~ • _ ~-L_ _ ~cr q' y - -
~ • r~ s ~`t
L~ -:Z ~ ~~`4 ~ •~,~L~`-''
D-.7Q~
czlc~Z3~~s~~ ~
W11SEY&HAM :n
sR aa saa>uw~ counmr
~ PALIFTC EJJERGRM WMCH4P1GE -
, ' 198~i17lRA.cnoa N 8 ~ cdr.. ALTEPmTNE NO. 6, , .
[ D. B=C 9174s----~--_
@allerw WA984~77711
ALTERNATIVE NO. 6
- -5
, This ❑ption would be to canstruet an urban anterchange. Dae to
the number ❑f inerges and lane crv$sings morremenes required in an
urban interc'hange the eorrfigurativn rvorks best when the two
xntersecting alignments crvss at right angIes (90-degrees). This
alignment will cause Energreen Road to be at verp steep grades
with excessive fiils. This wauTd cause the existing water tvwer
and wel1 site to be last.
~
~
E
~ . ~ ~ff~l~~~ !•'ti ~ ~~1',d~~~' ~ p .
~A~►~ _ _ ~fI1~ ~ I4~, ! ~ . rA
- zo ~1
`y'~f
~ ~ Il ~r'jl ~ ~`i4~;d,~q ,1~ 'J ~ ,
. A;,~~R
1 ai;
~ I ci ~iJ~ ~~~j ~ ~ ~ ~ i
~ , ~ ~ ~ i ,~I1 j~ ~r r ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ : ! • -
1
l ~ r ~~~~l~~ ~ ! •
evEnGREENrm
I $~3. • . ' ~ 3'~7~~f • ~ iF: r s ~
4E
1 r ~ ~ ' r~• ~ b
~ ~ ~;~~j,~l !f~ ~ . • f~ ~ ,
. iJ~l
rE! ~ f
l,
. z
t ryryyy `1~I f
rir~,,; ~ ; ~ , , ,
I 1 ~ 1 ~ 1.
f •0 0!,"~I1~ ~II 1 3
~ 7,' ~~~r~~7 1 ~p ` x
~ J~ ~j ~ ~l ~I i p •
p
Ffl
e F
h~$ 5YA r~ ~
• JdHI4 5PELJN4AN 4 gr ❑UANE BFRENTSC7N
Gavetnor Seaetaay
5`rATE QF WASHIVG70N
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPQRTATION
Transporranvn &r1ldng • Qfympia. Wasf'rrr+grdrr 98504 . (206) 753-"5
June Zl, 1984
_k E~Cilf
JUN 271984
Mr. , F? . R. Hammnnd
~ Transgartation Engineer WILSEY & HAM, 4NC,
WilstY and Hanr
P. C]. Bvx C-97304
;SeIlevue, wasnin5tan 98009
Re: SR 90
- 5u13.ivan Park Center
Txaffic impact Analysis
and Design 5tudy
. Dear Mr. Hammand:
Thank you fve yvur ietter of March 9, 1984, which prvvided
acopy of the "Traffic Impact Anaiysis and Design Study°
repart cancerning the abvve-referenced prvject. It has been
a pleasure wvrking with yau thraugh the numeraus meetina:s
and ather discussions which haVe resulted in this repvrE.
The repart includes cvnsiderable detailed infarmation relative
ta traffic pra3ecti.ans and resultant 1evels of servace frvm
both backgraund traffic and traffic anticipated as a result
of develapment af the propvsed shapping center. We have revz.ewed
this material and in general concur with your traffic prvjections
and analysis.
The reoart i.ncludes generaI design details fvr several features
which are necessary tv maintain the minimum desired Level
of Service "D" for traffic vperatians. The c3esign features
and Levels af Service calculations are genera].Ty considered
acceptable as presented in the report.
The report cvnc].udes that traffic generated by the inatial
pnase af developraent of the shopping center can adeguately
be aecvmmodated with the ctirrent W5DOT design for an upgraded
diamond interchange at Sullivan Raad. Ta maintain satisfactvey
traffic operations wouZd however requare the canstruction
af access ramps between Indiana Avenue and the westbvund
off- and an-ramps af I-90. These access connections woczld
paraZl.e1 Su3livan Rvad both ❑n the east and the west, These
- Mr. H. R. Hammvnd
June 23, 19$4
Page 2
cannections are not a gart of the WSDaT updated plan. Therefore.
canstructivn funding wi11 nat }ae pravided by W5~OT and is
the responsi.bility of vthers.
The acceptability of this plan is based an the initial phase
af development of the shapping center being li.mi.ted to apgrax-
imately 650,090 square feet af grass leasib3.e area. Any expan-
sion beyvnd that l.e~el of develapment for the firs" ohase
wvuld nat be acceatable to the Department without acditianal
access and capaciCy pravisians.
, The report also draws conclusians relative to access needs
f vr the ultimate development af the shopping center and
perigheral area. We concur with the fi.nding that ta ac3equately
serve the full development will require an addi,tianal access
to the area frvm Interstate 90. withaut suGh an acc4ss, Sulli.van
Road and passibiy Qther interchanges in the area will breakdvwn
and, thus nvt be able tv provide the appxapriate level of
service to the traVeler. WSDaT cvncurrence with develnpment
beyond the firs` stage wvuld require cvmmitment ta oraviding
an additignai access poirrt to service the area.
We have apgreci.ated the cvaperative attitude v€ you and ~ourt
staff, We apprecaate the oppvrtunfty tQ review the rinal
report and have na comments or recommendations fvr madxficativns
in i.t. we will be pleased to cvntinue worlcing with yvu on
glans to adequataly serve the public as the development can-
tinues through additivnal stages.
If you have any questians vr wish tv discuss any af this
materaal further, please feel free to cvntact me or Ron Hart
in vur District 6 offace in Sgakane.
= Sincerely.
- S. A. MOON. P.E.
Lgcatian-Design Engineer
SAM : tw
cc: A. D. Andreas
Ron Hart
~ Gary F[ennali, SpoEcane Cty.
Raymond Hanson
J . • °
/
` VIC~/ ~~.~~tm~~~~` 1i/~ li~ KR~/~~►V'~ lrlf~r ~ - . ' ~ _ °
!r Transpprtativn 8wlding KF-Qf _
° p;ympia, WastlfngtOn 98504•5201 - ~ -
1 . (c^46) 753•60[]5' - - - - ' _ ~ r--
• copy
, - - FROM FHWp WRSF;MGTflN ~fN~S~c
~ - February 26, 1988
Mr. Paul C. Gregsan
~ - L1ivx-sian Admiaistrator
Federal Highway Adm3nistratian r
, 711 Svuth Capitol Way, 5uite 501 ~i 1, ; _T
' ❑Iympia, WA 98501 -
~ M5 FJ-51
REs GS 3203 SR 90
~ Sullivaxt Rnad Interehange
Ra-mp MadXfications
MI' 291.92 ,
650665 -
Dear Mr. Gregsvn: ,
! This letter canstitutes a design report supplement farth.is project.
Yarar December 16, 1987, desiga report approval for this project wa.s sub,ject
to: 1) The turning radii must be madified to accoaamodate a WB-63 nehicl.e
~ 2} Access to the sewage pump stati,an must he frvm Tndiana Avenue
vnly.
~ We cvri.ctnz w-ith both apprvval conditions. We have mndif#,ed the i,ntarehsage
plana ta accommodate WB-63 vehicle movemeitits at the ramp term.inals and at
the SulTivan FtoadlIadiaaa Avenue intersection. We have further msd3fied
the NS-W` ramp entrance ta enhance the right 't,sm. Tliese modificatioAS are
~ noted on the attaehed iaterchange gZans_ ~
Yaur appraval vf this design repvrt supplement is requested. a
Sincerely,
t~m~
s Menb nah34k
.
*W Eagmoj~ . ,
S. A. MOCIN, P. E. ,
~ - - ' LvcaCian-IYesign Engineer
' sAM:rrlF179 .
' csrs (DR)
. ;
- ALtachments - " -
cc: R. Q. Andersarc, 1]ist. b
T. . McLain, Prag. Dev . . P. C CSQ~l, i3~l.sIa~r fdr~~~€srrta~rr~~ ~
_ R. W. wade, Paans E~~FrAlJ: /F.'/4='•.~
_ • ' ~ ' ~'rJ
T 25 N , fi 44 E., W M _pFSica rLn a ,Nawa
s aw ~
2fIC' PJ 27Q'19S' ~+?BS- S'a.~y f'.7'~~J
~ ~ m!P;N'+ [iiTf
'~+F wl fl[a ~ ~'LS4 ~ IFli, ~OeY r Ksri ~ -
[~'v ufm1+"~ ^av w. ~ Wa~ Sn.m.vRwu P ~w , ~ IS ]~!'p 1i 30fnQi 't'7 ' l~!"S
ssi~r~~•'~~~r"~ i~.Easa
~ '
1r.s, ~c, , ~ zR er 1 z~~
~t~-^~ase •"a ~ .~~+!3c'
f1i+Qi e ~ 4caai ;
~
S7~p~ ~ Ilr~l ~ .mm ~ ~xr ~ rP' ~ ~ . ns.w• C_-Pt ~avm . i . '~fp~I'
~ `{d ~ F pR5[L'fEV Ruf rw vl6r+~ TvM 1'aJO ! i • ~ • f'rtri~r ~
_ t~ N~ W 0~/ K~}AM ~'C~kk 4~4 AC'~'lF.~4~ nMITFF
}51 gm N i~, .[r~etv n+asys rarr ra.v ~
[a13i1 25~ RIRNBIlSi ~ ftihC ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~~P~'^'1 ww..~. 'fAwa tl ww
V~ B~Pe E- ra •RAreP
I51'~ PT 9 IN15-RRS•58E6 Pp L'i14VfR~RVf.I~IXSOd 6POC E•MFfM RYE ipSNOTf F~9 ~La ~un ~r nw~~~a
d~ Ta FQT IMOIANI5 aYE y~ ~ j~,' •wMU R.:. &4QK l IHF
y ay7 ~ ~1 03•9llg. i!l ~ r = p~0.
r~ t~ ~ ~ rxs.anrr • - r ~G " . ? _ i m m
~ t
tT1doNA AVEI :d
- ccnN usnfn. . •,ffi~7°• ,f I ~y ~ ...~'.ii _ ~ k~a
Li9P N}"b aoi e...;. - '
.
' iooaI 2on'i[mnvlr ~~m.ng^w~~~.~-'f•.~,..iiw
~ ~'.r'. 9 • y , TO ~ ~ `5 ~ ~ PC E~ies Hsvw
~ P~lSM11~~9T6 CEGC~*E K~ ~~i awwd~ I~ .a. ~
CEG ~
~y ~x~~ Ty ~ ,l ~ ~~~~,r,rrrr+rrrrFr ~r -'l~, k
B ~
4~ f ~ PI E-ItS.d1AYp g q
vc __-7 ~ ~v~ e-xv ro,a169 ~
u. ~ .Y7 Y 5 ,y . ~y ' _'~,1,_`~ ~ • •'`~i ~ Ewn E-eG~Rr1fP ~
1 ~ S Cs IeP
I
1 ~ ~~4- 14=pf
¢-MTi~.~K. '
ws— 9•79.F5. SI ISLT xr r.r
1 ~ Nn
~ ~ ~ / ~ pxer~e.wxi~~' ;;i•'~`~ V
a~ r~~r+w[a i0.61_ p'LL
a~p u} enmwa~u
-
esw ~ a i, ~,r* t~ W~PNg I POiE nF ~•~ee u ` ~ r P. r-.a ~~.~b
S1s' +l f l`~11•~ rc e•
ir•43f.
mm.nm+xrmen .e•nnrrn _„~.~wiQ~ a~ as-~n aarPa~ae ^3 ti, 9''~~-~ _ k--
~r~~gr~sn
,
'_'___"'__'ti~ _
~1
~
- - - - • - - - , - ~ -`~"c ~ :g~ ~y ~ S
• ~"Y~' ~ 1 y ~
~ ~ _ ------------------------____------------°--------__y~
~=~`:-~-=_-~~,.aV'~--_ k'N•e3ea./ ~151" \Yy6`~ -ry
- _
~.e,..qsnx
aui:uaaso" 'zsz~
y
~ U° ..,.~..,.,..r ~ ~ W'40
4
~ty 1~ ~s
4~`~WWSC~u.cia~~f✓~~1
~
YuL[ iM /FCS E iy i~~~~•
~ ~ ~ e 11F a
na o ~w zuo tl .~:tygq
~ ~ FIIGHSNAY DEVlSiOH 51190
s Washtngton State SULLIVAW RO+40 1N7ERCHANGE
~
W7,f pepgMomt o! Tran&porlation RAMP Nk3DIFICATI[1tiS
~a.,~..t. , ~ g -
..w ~ 6171 I I:L~t cs 3zo307 vra,wsr M P zai sz i
o~ .a. ,••••m• ~ ~ IHTERCHANGE PL~7N ?
, r
~C ~a •
[IOT u°nra.an 3
lu+~+vtl ,APPp~G SETclw':
~ T.25N, R 44 E, YV 9a1
END Ns-.~P .40
r-ctjRo Pp L INp1iNA AVE ~r$~~. ~ qa
Ri~E7 TIG1F►~ ~W1A !T 16JN" 15-16.PS
~ - / }7bS39 F.q~u~06i
cn0 tulu
~ ~ ~ y . as•a ! ° ~ .
KK14~g : +1.n, wwa~u ave s1il+Wiov ~ ~
4~ ~ ~ ' ~r I• ftYa~ S MF WT' RN t5LLl_"a" RD i ]I+Ea'J9
~ ~ ~~t
3A! $ecwPLR
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~T ~a. ' ~kM= Tk%FM aAM)
~ \ ry ~ PG W~~'AI{
S S ~ '
s~nw,c im5s ~p ~ ~ fHr+ayq
t iWR BEGa E•NS RaMP
~ ~ ~ ~ pnc Fww~+a ¢rE ~oe.d7 ar
CN4SSV&LK
~ ~ r n a , x+•a - ~ .,~,W r
~ r - rkstgn rnaMc Marm
BE a~U.m~,,~~ ~ s ~ ~ ~
~ [E AIdT-~-~ r 1 G~ .
-SIIkiYLLk
a I y,
10
BC OEOICflTEC ''r•••,fi ~ ~
Q( ~
w
Becrr~ rs.+ n~.~p p¢ sev Tn+src vaAum
Tw9-rr 4B.sa.~ ~•sr.rr , b x
wr■ s~aa-rn, aus ca r * '2~/ ~ R $ .,w
~ ~ ~ ~ , rrt►~rr~%T+%n~,23rxt~isid~` _ ~ - 'sn , ~ ~ , ~
rn.nrrr~TVnrntrnlnh"" ' _r:ae . S° ` t /~~ssn
~ ~ .n E~c Hs~w R"*"~ _ ~ - _ ~ t~ r - _ ~.tiw.u~+c r~rn. ° iD a~u~ ~son~ I
I ~ ! , • ~ 6
~ a~ e ra*a ~r w...nrw m na-. iw.a n Far ~ ~ ra s9 si. u ~ ti , i ~ ~
s.r~ rc .or ~ i~ I I I rarcN ex vav~ wimH
cvsn~ mu v.a.. r~. 1-1
m..o.rm n a. . eo ~ rasen ~ y~'~a~1° 't~~ap1~ ~ SF~~\. ~ ~ ` ~~~v~ -~.~•-i:4
7 a~ ra~ y1 i tl j~I~
+ y ~ ~ 1
R4xP
PI E•w9' ~.b189
T ~
~~L~~~ ~6 ` ` ~ / ~ En0 d-M9' ~sxP
POT 4-n5 II.Sd.l4 a,
E•MS' !ly~M,24'LL
~ ~ ~ _ •TM~•~^ F11[iHWAT DIYI&IOH sR ~
o.... ~ sutt~iVntr RaAo irr~tcHAr~GE
~ m raporteum RahnP MOoiFscariaHs
9 ~
V4'~[ N!L'li r e saascs7 Lmunrv a~ a z~sz
Qen
GHANNELaATION 8 5lGHWG PLAN c'
sP fn-!
DOT rrwr aw+,
14M a'lb .11,70
~a~
1985 HCM= BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENT
FACILITY SECTION..... I-90 EB PINES TO SULLIVAN
ANALYST 7RW
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 1983
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 2/7/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... EXISTING LOS CALCULATION EASTBOUND
A) AD3USTMENT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES.. 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) 70
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9
DRIVER POPULATION FACTOR 1 (WEEKDAY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIDTH (FT) 12
OBSTRUCTIONS NO SIDES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE....., 6
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV w P-
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.00 1.00
C) OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
N0. OF LANES........ 2
INPUT VOLUME........ 1640
V/C RA7I0........... .47
LEVEL OF SERVICE.... B
SPEED (mph)......... 57
DENSITY (pcpmpl).... 16
1985 HCM: BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENT
FACZLITY SECTION..... I-90 WB SULLZVAN TO PINES
ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 1983 PM PK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 2/7/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... EXITING LOS CALCULATIONS
A) ADJUSTMEyT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES.. 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) 70
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9
DRIVER POPULATION FACTOR 1 (WEEKDAY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIDTH (FT) 12
OBSTRUCTIONS NO SIDES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE...... 6
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
• TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV w p
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.00 1.00
C) OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
***~~****~~****~~~****~c~~~~*
N0. OF LANES........ 2
INPUT VOLUME........ 1270
V/C RATIO........... .37
LEVEL OF SERVICE.... B
SPEED ( mph ) . . . . . . . . 57
DENSITY (pcpmpl).... 13
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 1
FACILITY LOCATION.... I-90 EB PINES TO SULLIVAN
ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... PRESENT
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... EB ON RAMP @ PINES W/0 EVERGREEN
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ,
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(Typical - 200 #/HP)
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEED (mph)........... 70
(BUSES AND RV'S ARE CONSIDERED AS TRUCKS)
LEVEL TERRAIN
B) INPUT INFORMATION
N0. OF LANES ON FREEWAY : 2(per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERISTICS=
( 1 ) RIGHT-HAND RAMP.
(2) ONE LANE RAMP.
UPSTREAM ANALYSIS DOWNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
VOLUME 550 1640 400 N.A.
% TRUCKS 5 5 5 N.A.
RAMP TYPE OFF N.A. ON N.A.
DISTANCE 2200 N.A. N.A. N.A.
- 1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 2
C) RAMP ANALYSZS RESULTS
TRUCK PRESENCE IN LANE 1= 75 o OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
RAMP ANALYZED WITH UPSTREAM RAMP USING FIGURE 1.5- 1
V1 Vr Vf
VPH 466 400 1090
Ei 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.94 0.97 . 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPH 551 458 1249
CHECKPOINT VOLUME LOS
FREEWAY= 1707 B •
MERGE= 1009 C
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
FACILITY LOCATION.... I-90 EB PINES TO SULLIVAN
TIME AND DATE........ PRESENT ; 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... EB ON RAMP C PINES W/0 EVERGREEN
1985 HCM=RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 1
FACILITY LOCATION.... I-90 EB PINES TO SULLIVAN
ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... PRESENT
DATE OF ANALYSIS...:. 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... EB OFF RAMP @ SULLIVAN
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(Typical - 200 #/HP)
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEED (mph)........... 70
(BUSES AND RV'S ARE CONSIDERED AS TRUCKS)
LEVEL TERRAIN
B) INPUT INFORMATION '
N0. OF LANES ON FREEWAY : 2(per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERISTICS=
(1) RIGHT-HAND RAMP.
(2) ONE LANE RAMP.
UPSTREAM ANALYSIS DOWNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
VOLUME N.A. 1640 550 220
e TRUCKS N. A. 5 5 5
RAMP TYPE N.A. N.A. OFF ON
DISTANCE N.A. N.A. N.A. 2400
~ .
i ( 1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS . PAGE 2
****~~~*~*~*****~~c*~*~~***~*****~~~~*~~~*~c***~~~*~*~~*~~~*~*****
~ C) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS
I
~
TRUCK PRESENCE IN LANE 1: 67 v OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
, RAMP ANALYZED WITH DOWNSTREAM RAMP USING FIGURE 1.5- 2
' V1 Vr Vf
, VPH 1017 550 1640
~ ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.97 0.97 0.97
i PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
i PCPH 1165 630 1879
CHECKPOINT VOLUME LOS
FREEWAY: 1879 B
DIVERGE= 1165 C
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
FACILITY LOCATION.... I-90 EB PINES TO SULLIVAN
TIME AND DATE........ PRESENT ; 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... EB OFF RAMP @ SULLIVAN
1985 HCMsRAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 1
- FACILITY LQCATION,.., 1-90 WB SULLIVRN TO PINES
ANALYST 7ODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... PRESENT
_ DATE QF ANALYSxS...., 2/8J89
dTHER INFORMATIdN.... WB QN RAMP @ SULLIVAN
A) AD3USTMENT FACTORS
PERGENTAGE OF 7RUCKS................. 5 {TYPical - 200 #/Hp}
PEAK HGUR FACTQR .9
- HxGHwAY DESaGN sPEEa (mph)........... 70
(suSEs aND Rv's ARE CvNszDEREa As TRucKs)
LEVEL rERRazN
B) INPUT INFORMATIdN
-__r-_____-_______-----__-_-__-__A--_______d____-__---___--__
NO. OF LANES ON FREEWRY : 2 (per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERISTICS:
(1) RIGHT-HANQ RAMP,
(2) ONE L.ANE RAMP.
UP57REAM ANALYSTS D(7WhlSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
VOLUME 130 1270 554 N .A .
% TRUC1t5 5 5 5 N .A .
RAMP TYPE DFF IV .fir . ❑N N.A.
DISTANCE 2400 N .A . N .A . N.A.
~
~ 1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 2
;
C) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS
TRUCK PRESENCE IN LANE 1: 74 % OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
~ RAMP ANALYZED WITH UPSTREAM RAMP USING FZGURE 1.5- 1
~ V1 Vr Vf
VPH 466 550 1140
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.94 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPH 551 630 1306
' CHECKPOINT VOLUME LOS
FREEWAY: 1936 B
MERGE: 1181 C
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
FACILZTY LOCATION.,., I-90 WB SULLIVAN TO PINES
TIME AND DATE........ PRESENT ; 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... WB ON RAMP @ SULLIVAN
I
I
i
~
~
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 1
FACILITY LOCATION.... I-90 WB SULLIVAN TO PINES
ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS.... . PRESENT
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... WB OFF RAMP AT PINES
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(Typical - 200 #/HP)
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEED (mph)........... 70
(BUSES AND RV'S ARE CONSIDERED AS TRUCKS)
LEVEL TERRAIN
B) INPUT INFORMATION
N0. OF LANES ON FREEWAY : 2(per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERISTICS=
( 1 )-RIGNT-HAND RAMP.
(2) ONE LANE RAMP.
UPSTREAM ANALYSIS DOWNSTREAM
f2AMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
VOLUME N.A. 1270 410 550
% TRUCKS N.A. 5 5 5
RAMP TYPE N.A. N.A. OFF ON
DISTANCE N.A. N.A. N.A. 2200
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 2
- C) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS
_ TRUCK PRESENCE IN LANE 1: 72 % OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
RAMP ANALYZED WITH DOWNSTREAM RAMP USING FIGURE 1.5- 2
~ vl vr vf
VPH 816 410 1270
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.96 0.97 • 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPH 944 470 1455
CHECKPOINT VOLUME LOS
FREEWAY: 1455 B
DIVERGE= 944 B
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
FACILITY LOCATION.... I-90 WB SULLIVAN TO PINES
TIME AND DATE........ PRESENT ; 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... W8 OFF RAMP AT PINES
1985 HCM= BASZC FREEWAY SEGMENT
FACILITY SECTION..... EB I-90 PINES TO SULLIVAN
ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 2000 PM PK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 2/8/89 -
OTHER INFORMATION.... WITH DEVELOPMENT W/0 EVERGREEN I/C
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
PERCENTAGc OF TRUCKS 5(TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERCENTAGE OF BUScS 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES.. 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) 70
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9
DRIVER POPULATION FACTOR 1 (WEEKDAY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIDTH (FT) 12
OBSTRUCTIONS NO SIDES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE...... 6
B) CORRECTZON FACTORS
,
TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV w p
LEVEL 2.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.00 1.00
C) OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
N0. OF LANES........ 3
INPUT VOLUME........ 3895
V/C RATIO........... .75
LEVEL OF SERVICE.... C
SPEED (mph)......... 53
DENSITY (pcpmpl).... 28
G
~
1985 HCM= BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENT
FACILITY SECTION..... WB I-90 SULLIVAN TO PINES
ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
, TIME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 2000 PM PK HR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 2/8/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... WITH DEVELOPMENT W/0 EVERGREEN I/C
A) ADJUSTMEVT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES 0
PERCENTAGE 0F RECREATIONAL VEHICLES.. 0
DESIGN SPEED (MPH) 70
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .9
DRIVER POPULATION FACTOR 1 (WEEKDAY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIDTH (FT) 12
OBSTRUCTIONS NO SIDES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE...... 6
B) CORRECTION FACTORS
TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV w p
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.00 1.00
C) OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
N0. OF LANES........ 3
INPUT VOLUME........ 3360
V/C RATIO........... .64
LEVEL OF SERVICE.... C
SPEED ( mph ) . . . . . . . . 56
DENSITY (pCpmpl).... 22
1985 HCM;RAMp ANALYSIS PRGE 1
FACILI7Y LOCA7IOM---• 1-90 EB ON RAMP @ PINES I/C
ANALYST T4D❑ R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSZS..... YR 2000 PM PEAK HOUR
❑ATE OF ANALYSIS...:. 1f27/89
❑THER INF❑RMATTQN.... W/0 EVERGREEN WITH 1/3 EVER. RAMP VOLUM
, ES pODED
A3 AoJusrMENT FAcTORs
PERcEN3AGE aF rRUcKs..,.............. s (Typicai - zov #iHp)
PEAK HaUR FACTOR .9
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEEa (mPh) .........o. 70
, (BU5E5 AND RV°S ARE CoMSIDERED AS TRUCKS)
LEVEL TERRAIN
B) INPUT INFORMATION
---w--_-___--------------------------------------------------
NO. OF LANES DN FREEWAY : 3 (per diYection)
ANALYSIS RAMR GHARACTERISTICS:
(1) RIGHT-HAND RAMP.
(2) Oh4E LANE RAMP.
1JPSTREAM ANALYSIS Dd]WNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMR
Vf]LUME 1261 3455 619 N.A.
% TRUCKS 5 5 5 N ,A .
RAMp 7YPE OFF N.A o DtV N.A,
❑ISTANCE 2200 N.A. N.A. N.A.
1995 NCM:RAMP ANALYSIS pAGE 2
C) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS
TRvCK PRESENCE IN LaNE 1: 51 % OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
RAMP ANALYZED WITH UP5TREAM RAMP USING FIGURE 1.5- 6
WARINING! IN USING THIS NOMOGRAPH=
Maxmal range for Vf is 2400 to 6200 vph
Normal ran9e far Vu is 50 to 1200 vph
U1 Vr Vf
- VPH 312 519 2194
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
F'hv 0.89 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPM 390 704 2513
CHECiCPOINT VOLIJME LO5
FREEWAY: 3222 8
MERGE. 1499 C
RWMP ANALYZEC] WITH UP57REAM RAMP L]SIiVG APRRO?CIMATION METHOD
V1 Vr Vf
VPH 132 614 2194
E7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhu 0.77 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.94
PCPH 240 749 2513
CHECKPQINT VDLUME LDS '
FREEWAY= 3222 s
MERGE : 899 8
IQENTIF`t?WG XNFORMA7ION
FACILITY LaCATIDN.... I-94 EB ❑N RpMP i PINES I!C
TIME AND DATE......,. YR 2000 PM PEAK HOUR ;1/27/89
DTHER INFoRMATIc]N W/a E►lERGREEN WITH 1/3 EVER. RAMP tilaLUM
ES ApDED
1985 HCM:RAMP AMALYSIS PAGE 1
FACILI7Y L❑CATzQN.... I-94 ES OFF RAMP 0 SULLIVAN I/C
ANALYST.............. TODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 2040 PM PEAK HR
DATE OF ANALYSTS..... 1l27/89
OTHER INFORMATION...-. W/Q EVER AND WITH 2/3 0F EVER TRAFFIC V
OLUMES AODED Ta RAMPS
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTDRS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5 (Typical - 200 #/HP)
PEAK HOUR FRCTaR .9
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEED (mph)........... 70
(BUSES AN❑ Rv's aRE coNSrQEREo as TRUCKs)
LEVEL YERRAIN
8] IMPUT TNFQRMA7IOM
s Ng. OF LANES ON FREEWAY : 3(per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERISTICS:
(1) RIGHT-HAND RAMP,
(2) ONE LANE RAh1P.
UPSTREAM AIVALYSIS daWNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
VQLUME N .A . 3158 1286 846
% TRkJCKS N. A, 5 5 5
RAMP TYPE N.A. N.A. QFF QN
aISTRNCE N.A. N.A. N.A. 2800
1
1485 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 2
C) RAMF ANALYSIS RESULTS
TRUCK PRESENCE IN LANE 1= 44 % OF FREEWAY tRUCKS
RAMP ANALYZED WI7H DaWNSTREAM RAMP USING FIGURE 1.5- 7
V1 Vr Vf
VPH 1434 1286 3158
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
FhW 0.97 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.94 4.90 0.90
PCPH 1843 1473 3617
CHECKPOINT VOLI]ME LaS
FREEWAY: 3617 C
DIVERGE; 1643 Q
IDENTIFYING INFnRMATTON
FAGILTTY LOC,4TION.... 1-40 E8 oF'F RAi"iP 0 SLILLIVAN I/C
`a'TME AND DATE YR 2400 PM PEAiC HR : 1/27/89 ❑THER INFORMA7ION WID EVER AidD WITH 2/3 OF EVER TRAFFIG V
OLllMES ALDED 7Q RAMPS
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 1
FACILITY LQCATIQN.... I-90 WB 0N RAMP @ SuLLIVAN
, ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALY5I5..... YR 2000 PM PEAK HOUR
DarE oF ANpLYSZS...:. 1/27/$9
flTHER INFORMATIDN.... W/d EVER I/C AND WITH 2/3 OF EVER VaLUM
ES ADDED
A} AaJUSTMENT FACTQRS
PERCENTAGE 0F TRUCKS 5 (TYpical - 204 #/HR)
PEAK HOUR FaCBaR..................... .4
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEED(mph)........... 70
(BuSEs AMa Rv's ARE caNsIoERED aS TRucKS)
LEVEL TERRazN
- 8) INPUT TNFORMATION
NO. OF LANES ❑N FREEWAY = 3 CPer directionJ
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERI57IC5:
(1) RIGHT-HAND RAMP.
(2) QhJE LANE RAMP.
~
UPSTftEAM ANALYSIS DDWNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RRMF RAMP
VOLl1ME 612 €375 1373 N .A .
% TRt}CKS 5 5 5 N.A.
RpMP 7YPE flFF N.A. 0N N.A.
DISTAI+iCE 2800 N.A. N.A. N.A.
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 2
C) RAMP ANALYSIS RE5ULT5
TRVCK PRESENCE IN LANE 1= 50 % OF FREEWAY TRUGKS
WARNIMG; x trucks an lane 1, Volume is autside Fxg 5.6
RAMP ANALYZED WITH UPSTREAM RAMP uSING FIGURE 1,5- b
WRRINING! YN USING TNrS NaMOGRAPH: .
Normal ranee fpr Vf is 2400 to 5200 Vph
Narmal range for 4u is 900 to 2604 ft
Vi Vr Vf
VPh 0 1373 263 ,
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhu 1.00 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.9v 0.94 0_90
PCPH 0 1573 301
CHECKFOI1+i7 VOLUNlE LOS
FREEWAY= 1874 A
MERCE= 1573 Q
RAMP ANALYZED WITH IJPaTREAM R,4MP vSING APPRO?CIM,4TFON METHOa
V1 Vr Vf
VPH 16 1373 263
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.74 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 4.40
PCPH 24 1573 341
CHECKPL72NT V4LlJME LOS
FREEWaY: 1874 A
MERGE= 2597 l7
IDENI'IFYING INFORMA7ZON
- ---_---_-ti _ _
FACLLITY LOCA7IQN I-90 WB E3N RAMP @ 5C91L1 IVAN
T FME AND DATE YR 2040 PM PEAIS HOl1R : 1/27C89
OTHER INFQRMATi IC]N W/v EVER I/C ANQ WITH 2/3 DF EVER VQLLIM
ES ADDE4
- . i
1985 HCM:RAMF Ah[ALYSIS PAGE 1
FACILTTY LoCA7IL7N.... 1-90 W8 0FF RAMP 0 PINES I!C
ANALYST . , . . . . . , . . . . . . TOQD R. WFiIPPLE
TTME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 2000 PM PEAK HOL]R
OpTE tJF ANALYSIa. . . . . 1i27/89
07HER INFORMA`fION...-. W/O EVER I/C WITH 1/3 OF EVER RAMP VOLU
ME5 ADaED
A) AD3USTMEIVT FACTORS
PERCEN7AGE OF 7"RUCKS . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 (Typical - 204 #AHP )
PERIC HaUFt FAC7OR _ . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . .9
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEED (mPh . . . . . . . . 0 70
( 9USE5 k1Nf.7 RV'S ARE Ct3NSTDE'RED AS TRl,]C}CS)
LEVEL TERRAIN
B) F MPUT INFORMAT I ON
NQ . DF LANES QN FREEWAY : 3 (per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERISTICS:
(1) R I GHT-HANQ RAMP.
(2) t7NE LANE RAMP.
UP5YREAM A[VALYSFS DOWNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
' VB7L.l,1P'IE N,A. 3360 604 1494
% TRUCKS ik! .d4 . 5 5 5
RAMP TYPE N. A. N, A o OFF C1N
D I57ANCE N. A. N. A. N. A s 2200
i
!
1985 HGM;RAMP aNALYSIS PABE 2
C ) RAMP ANALY5IS RESULTS
TRLiGK PR'ESENCE IN LANE 1: 49 % QF FREEWAY TRUGKS
RAMp ANALYZED WITH GOWNSTREAM RAMP USINia FIGURE Y.S- 7
V1 Vr Vf
VPH 1160 604 3360
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhu 0,95 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 4.90 0.90
- PCPli 13S7 648 3849
- CNECKPQINT 1AOLUME LO5
FREEWAY: 3849 C
DIVERGE: 1357 C
IDENTIFYINC INFORMA3IC3M
FACILITY LC3CATIDN . . . . I--90 &dB OFF RpMP 0 PINES ItC
TIME AND i]ATE YR 2000 PM PEAK HClUR :1/27/89
4THER iNFnRMA7I[3N.... W/43 EVER E/C WITH 1/3 0F EVER RAMP VOLU
MES ADQEQ
~
1985 HGM- BASIC FREEWpY SEGMENT
FACILITY SECTION..... 1-90 pINES TO EVERGREEN EB
ANALYST TQDD R. WHIPPLE
TIME ❑F ANALYSIS..... YR 2040 RM PEAK HOUR
DATE OF ANALY5I5..... 1/26/89
DTHER INFORMATION.... APPRflx STA 306t50 TO 341+00
A) AaJUSTMENT FACFpRS
PERCENTAGE aF TRUCKS 5(TYPICAL - 200 #lHP)
' PERCENTAGE OF BUSES O
PERCENFAGE QF RECREATIONAL VENIELES.. Q
QEsIGN sPEEo (MPH) 70
-
PEAK HOuR FACTDR .9
DRIVER PtlPULATIQN FAGTOR 1 (WEEKDAY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIaTH (FT) 12
OH57RUCTI0N5 NQ 5IDE5
DISTANCE (FT) FRQM ROADWAY EDGE...... 6
8) CvRRECTION FACTORS
TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV w p
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.40 1.00
C } f3PERATIpNpL AhfAL,YSIS RESULTS
NO. OF LANES........ 3
INPV7" VOLUME....,... 3895
VJC RATIO,.,........ .75
LEVEL QF SERVICE C
SP'EED ( mph ) . . . . . . . . . 53
❑ENS I TY (pcpmp 1 ) . . . . 28
~
1985 HCM= BASrC FREEWAY SEGMENT
FACILXTY SECTIaN,.,:. I-90 EVERGREEN TQ SuLLIVAN E8
ANALYST TODD R. WHYPPLE
TTME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 2000 PM PEAK HOvR
DATE OF ANALYSTS...., 1126/89
OTHER INFORMATIDN.... APPROX. S7A 371t04 TO 388t48.85
A) AaJUS7MENT FAC7OR5
PERCENTAGE ❑F TRUCKS,..........,.,... 5 (TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERCENTAGE OF BUSES 0
PERCENTAGE aF RECREATXQNAL VEHIGLES.. 0
QESIGN SPEED (MPH) ...a 70
PEAK M4uR FACTOR .9
❑RIVER POPULATIDN FAC70R 1 {WEEKARY/CQMMUTER}
LANE WIDTM (FY) 12
OBSTRUCTIONS......................... ND SIDES
azSzANcE (Fr) FRaM RvAowAY EnGE 6
B) CORREC7IDN FACTORS
TERRAIN TYPE T 8 R HV w p
L.EVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.00 1.40
C } C]PERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
Na. OF LANES........ 3
INPVT VdLUME 2875
V/C RA7Ia........... .55
, LEVEL C9F SERVICE . , . . C
` SPEED (mPh).....,... 57 '
i3EN5 T TY (PcPmP l),,.. 19
~
1965 NCM= BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENT
FACILITY SECTION...... 1-40 SULLIVAN TO EVERGREEN WS
ANALYS7 TDDD R. WNIPPLE •
7IME QF ANALY5I5..... YR 2440 PM PEAK HOUR
DA7E ❑F ANALYSI5..... 1l26/89
OTHER INFQRMATION.... APPROX. STA 339t00 T4 303+45
A) ADJUSTMENT FAC7aR5
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5 tTYPiCAL - 200 #/HP]
- PERCENTAGE OF 6USE5 0
` PERCENTAGE 0F RECREATIQNAL VEHICLES.. 0
DESIGN SPEEp (MPH) 74
PEAK HQUR FACTOR..................... .9
aRIVER PQPULaTIaN FACTOR 1 (WEEKflAY/COMMU7ER)
LAME WIDTH (FT)...................... 12
D85TRUCTxdNS Na SIDES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE 6
B) CaRRECTIaN FACTORS
TERRAIN TYPE T 8 R HV w p
LEVEL 1.7 1.S 1.6 0.97 1.40 1.04
G} OPERATIQNAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
NO. OF LANES..,..,.. 3
xMPUT VULUME........ 2355
V/G F2A7IQ.........-- -45
LEVEL QF SERVZCE.,,. 5
SPEEU ( mph) . . . . . . . . 58
DENSITY (PcPmPl) . . . . 15
1985 HCM: BASIC FREEWAY SEGMENT
FACILI7Y SECTiON..,.. I-40 EVERGREEN TO PIMES WB
ANALY57............... TODD R. WHIQPLE
TIME OF ANALYSZS...,. YR 2000 pM PEAK HOUR
QATE OF pNALYSIS.---- 1/26/89
OTHER INFaRMATIdN.... APPROX. STA 339t00 TQ 303+45
A) ADJU57MENT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE aF TRUCKS 5 (TYPICAL - 204 #fHP)
PERCENTAGE DF BUSES 0
PERCENTAGE OF RECREATI❑NAL VEHICLES.. Q
DEszGN sPEEa (MPH)..........o...,,.... 70
PEAK MOUR FACTOR q9
DRIVER POPULATIDN FACTOR...,,........ 1 (WEEKDRY/COMMUTER)
LANE WIdTH (FT) 12
OQ57RUCTZONS NO SIaES
DISTANCE (FT) FROM ROADWAY EDGE.....o 6
B) CORREC7ION FACTORS
TERRAIN TYPE T B R HV w Q
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.00 1.00
C) C7RERATIONAL ANALYS$5 RESUi T5
NQ. OF LANES........ 3
INPU3 VOLI.JME . . . . . . . . 3360
iIIC RATIO . . . . . . . . . . . .fa4
L.EVEL OF SERVICE F . . . C
~ SFEED ( mph ) . . . . . . . . . 56
~ DEiVSITY (pcPmpl ) . . . . 22
I
I
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 1
FACILI7Y LnCRTIDN.... I-90 ES PINES Ta EVERGREEN
ANALYST.............. TODD R. WHIPPLE
' TIME OF ANALYSIS..... YR 2000 PM PEAK HQUR
DATE OF ANALYSIS..... 1/30/89
OTNER INFORMATIDN.... WITH EVERGEEEN T/C
(6,'
A) Ap7lJ5TMENT FACTORS
PERcENrAGE aE fRUCKS . , . . . . . , . . . . , . . 5 (Typical - 200 #/wR )
PEAfC HOUR FACTOR .9
HIGHWAY DESIGN SPEED ([nph].......,... 74
' ( BusEs AND Rv 's ARE caNsIoEREa AS TRUCres )
LEVEL TERRAIN
B ) TNPUT IM1EFORMATiQM
NO. OF LANES (3N FREEWAY : 3 (per directivn )
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARAGTERISTICS:
(1) RIGHT-HAiVD RAMP.
(2) ❑NE LANE RAMP.
UPSTREAM ANALY5I5 [7DWNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMR FtAMP
VQLUME 1120 3455 444 425
% TRUCKS S 5 5 5
FtAMP TYPE OFF N.A. aN QFF
D I STANCE 2200 iV . A. No A, 3500
i
1485 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 2
G) RAMP ANALYSIS RESUL7S
TRUCK PRESENCE IN LANE 1= 51 % OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
RAMP ANALYZED WI3H UPSTREAM RAMP US3NG FIGURE 1.5- b
WARINING! IN USZNG THI5 NOMQGRAPH:
' Narmal ran9e for Vf is 2400 to 6200 vph
Normal range fvr Vu is 50 tv 1100 vph
V1 Vr Vf
VPW 43$ 440 2335
, E7 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhu 4.91 0.97 0.97
- PHF 0.90 0.90 0,90
PCPH 526 504 2675
CHECKPOINT VOLUME LOS
FREEWAY: 3179 B
MERGE. 1030 C
RAMP ANALYZED WTTH UPSTREAM RAMP USING APPROXIMATION METHOD
vi vr vf
VPH 183 440 2335
, ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.81 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PcnH 251 504 2675
CHECK'POFNT ►JDLL]ME LAS
F'REE&!AY : 3179 8
MERGE: 755 B
IDENTIFYING INFORMATIQN
FACIL~ITY LOCATIaN..a, 1-90 EB PINES TO EVERCREEN
' TIME ANQ DATE YR 2004 PM PEAK HOUR ; 1/34/89
OTHER INFORMATION.... WITN EVERGEEEN I/C
~
1985 HcM:RAMP aNALYsrs PAGE 3
C ) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS ( COIVTIIVl,1ED )
RAMP AIdALYZED WITH DaWNSTREAM RAhIP LtaING FIGURE 1.5- 6
WARINING! IN USING THIS NQMaGRAl='h{:
Narrnal range for Vf 35 2400 to 6240 vph
NarmaY range far Vu is 5o to 1104 Wph
V 1 ►Ir Vf ,
VPH 431 440 2335
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhu 0.91 4.97 0,97
- RHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
, PCPH 526 5474 2675
CHECKP+DINT VOLl1ME L(JS
FREEWAY: 3179 B '
MERGE : 1430 C
RAMP ANALYZED WITH ID4WN5rR'ERM RAMP USZNG APRRO}(IMATION ME7HAE3
V1 Vr Vf
VFH 183 440 2335
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhu 0.81 0.97 0.97
-
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPH 251 504 2675
CHECISPOINT WOLUME LO5
FREEWAY : 3179 6
MERGE= 755 B
IOENTIFYING INFORMATION
FACILITY LOCATIqN.... I-94 ES PItVES TO EVERGREEN
7IME ANQ DATE-.,...... YR 2004 PM PEAK HDUR ; 1/30l89
OTHER INFORMATION WITH EVERGEEEN I/C
~
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 4
C) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS (CONTINUED)
RAMP ANALYZED ALONE USING FIGURE 1.5- 6
WARINING! IN USING THIS NOMOGRAPH:
Normal range for Vf is 2400 to 6200 vph
Normal range for Vu is 50 to 1100 vph
V1 Vr Vf .
*~c**~
VPH 431 440 2335
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.91 0.97 0.97 PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPH 526 504 2675
CHECKPOINT VOLUME LOS
FREEWAY: 3179 B
MERGE: 1030 C
i RAMP ANALYZED ALONE USING APPROXIMATION METHOD
~ V1 Vr Vf
' VPH 183 440 2335
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
; Fhv 0.81 0.97 0.97
; PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPH 251 504 2675
I CHECKPOINT VOLUME LOS
' FREEWAY= 3179 8
~ MERGE= 755 B
I
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
FACILITY LOCATION.... I-90 EB PINES TO EVERGREEN
TIME AND DATE........ YR 2000 PM PEAK HOUR ; 1/30/89
, OTHER INFORMATION.... WZTH EVERGEEEN I/C
i
i
~
~
I
;
i
~ '
r f
1985 HCM:RAMP AMALYSIS PAGE I
FAGILiTY LOCATI4N.... I-40 EB PINES Ta EaERGREEN I/G
ANALYST TDdD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANpLYSIS..... YR 2400 PM PEAK HOUR
DATE OF ANALYSIS 1/30/89
OTHER TNFORMATION.... EH OFF RpMP A7 EVERGRE€N IIC
A) ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(FyPical W 200 #/HP)
PEAK HOUR FAC7OR.......o..=..,....... .9
HIGHWaY DESIGN SPEED (mPh) 70
(BVSE5 AND RV'S ARE CDNSIbERED A5 TRUCKS)
LEUEL TERRAIN
6) INPUT INFQRMATION
• NO. QF LANES ON FREEWAY :3 (per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CNARACTERISTICS:
(1) RTGHT-HAND RAMP.
(2) QPIE LAhJE RAMP.
UPSTREAM AfVALYSIS DO&1N5TREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
UOL:.UME 440 3895 425 538
% TRUCKS 5 S 5 5
RF1MP TYpE 4N N.A, OFF (]N
DIS7AhICE 3500 N.A. N.A. 2440
i
i
~
1985 HCM : RAMP AMALYSIS PAGE 2
C ) RAMP ANRLYSI5 RESIJLTS
TRUCK PREaENCE IN LANE 1: 55 % OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
RAMP ANALYZED WTTH UPSTREAM RAMP USING FTGURE 1.5- 7
ui Vr Vf
VPH 1323 425 4335
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 4.94 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.40
PePH 15+64 487 4965
CHECKPOINT VaLESME LDS
FREEWAY = 4966 D
❑IVERGE: 1564 D
TDENTIFYINC TNFORFIATION
FACILx7Y LaCATIaN..., 1-90 EB PINES Ta EVERGREEiV I/C
7IME AND DATE......., YR 2000 PM PEqK HaIJR ; 1/30l89
aTHEFt INFORMATION.... EB OFF RAMP AT EVEFdGREE1V I/C
1985 HCM=RAMP ANALY5I5 RAGE 3
C) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS (GONTINUED)
RAMP ANALYZE❑ WITH aOWNSTREAM RAMP USING FIGURE 1.5- 7
VI Vr Vf
VPH 1323 425 4335
ET 1.7 1.7 1_7
~ Fhv 0.94 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PGPH l S84 487 4966
CHEC14PaIN7 VQLUME LOS
FREEWAY: 4966 D
4IVERGE= 1564 D
IDEN7IFYING INFORMATI4N
FACILYTY LOCATi ION . . . . 1-90 EB PINES 7❑ EVERGREEN IIC
TIME AND aA7E........ YR 2000 PM PEAK Ht]UR ; 1/30/89
OTMER INFORMATION'.... E8 OFF RAMP AT EVERGREEN I!C
1965 HeM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 4
C } RAC'!P ANALYSTS RES1JLTS ( CONTINL]ED )
RAMP ANALYZED ALflNE USING FIGURE I.5- 7
Vi Vr Vf
VPH 1323 425 4335
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
FhV 0.94 0.97 0.97
•
PHF 0.90 0.90 4.94
PePH 1S64 487 4966
CHECi4P4TNT VOLUME L05
FREEWAY: 4966 D
DYVERGE: 1564 a
I QEN7I FY TNG IIdFORMAT I[}N
FACIC,ZTY L#3CAYIDN.... I-40 EB PTNES T8 E►JERGREEIV E/C
TgME AiVD DATE YR 2004 PM PEAK HOIJR : 1/30/89
OTHER INFi?RMATiC1N EB QFF RAMP AT EVERGREEN T/G
1985 HCM: WEAVIMG AREAS PAGE 1
FACILITY SECTIQN..... I-90 EVERGREEN TO SULLIVAN EB
ANALYS7 fODD R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF ANALYSIS YR 2004 PM REAK HDUR
DATE OF ANALYSIS...,. 1/26/89
OTHER TNFORMATIOM..., APPROX. STA 371+00 TO 388t45 W/ WEAVING
LANE ADDED
A) AD7USTMENT FACTORS
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(TYPICAL - 200 #/HP)
PERGEN7AGE OF BV5E5 0
PERCEN7AGE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES... O
PEAK HDUR FACTOR...................... .9
DRIVER POPULATIQM FACTflR.............. Z (WEEKDAY/C4MMUTER)
LANE WI❑TH (FT) 12
OBSTRUCTIaNS ❑N BOTM STDES
DISTANCE FROM RdADWAY EDGE (FT)....... 6
• B) CORRECTIQN FACfDRS
E E E f f f
TERRAIN TYPE T B R H'J w p
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.04 1.00
C } INPUT WDLUMES •
VaL (vph) (pcph) DESCRIPTIDN
V I 2,875 3,293 is the nonweaving vehiGles an the freewsy
V 2 909 1,041 is the down weavine vehicles
u3 538 616 is the up weaving vehicles
V4 0 0 is the ramp-to-ramR nonweaving Wehicles
0) ANALYSIS RESULTS
WEAVE TYPE A
N0. OF LAMES 4
L.ENGTH ❑F SECYIOI+# . . . . . , . . 1750 -
1N4 , OF MAINLINE E.ANES . . . . . . 3
(Upstream of WeaWe Section )
LDa SPEED
WEAVING VEHICLES D 43 mPh
NOIVWEAVING VEHICLES C 51 mph _
OPERA7ION 0F WEAVING AREA IS CC7NSTRAINED
ANALYZED MAXIMUM
WEAVING VQLUME ( VW 1,664 11504
VOLUME RAtAO ( VR ) . . . . 0.33 0.35
WEAVIM1IG RATIO (R ) . . . . 0.37 0.50
WEAV I NG LENGTH ( L)--- 1,750 2,000
1985 HCM: WEAVING pRERS PAGE 1
FACILTTY 5ECTIQN..... 1-90 SULLYUAN TQ EVERGREEN WB
ANALY57 TaDD R. WHIPPLE
TIME QF ANALYSIS ..a.. YR 2040 PM PEAK HdUR
OATE 0F ANALYSIS..... 1127/89 .
07HER INFORMATTON APFROx. STA 390+96 TO 364+04 W/ WEAVING
LANE ADDED
A) AD3USTMENT FACTORS
---=__Y----_-----------------------------------------------_-_
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS...,.,............ 5(TYPICAL - 204 #/HP)
~ PERGENTAGE 0F 8USES................... 0
PERCENTAGE nF RECREATIONAL VEHIGLES... a
PERK HDUR FACTOR .9
DRIVER PORULATION FACTDR 1 (WEEKDAYICOMMUTER)
LANE WIDTH (FT) 12
aHSTRUCTIONS 0N 8OTH SIDES
DISTANCE'FR❑M ROADWAY EDGE (FT).,..,.. g
B] GORRECTION FACTORS
-----------wti------------------------__-_---------------------
E E E f f f
TERRAIN TYPE T B R NV w Q
LEVEL 1.7 1.5 1.6 0.97 1.00 1.00
C ) INPCIT VOLUMES
VOL ( vph ) (PcPh ) DEscRIPTI(3N
V 1 2,355 2,697 is tha nonweavins Vehicles on the freeway
V 2 477 546 is the dvwn weaving Vehiel,es
V 3 1,025 1,174 is thg up weaWing vehicles
V 4 O 0 is the ramp-tv°ramp nonweaVing vehicles
D ) ANALYSIS RESLJLTS
WEAVE YYPE A
NO. ❑F LANE5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
L,ENGTH 4F SECT$QN 2190
N0. DF MAINLINE LANES.,.,.. 3
( UPstrea.m of Weave Section) .
LOS SPEED
WEAVING VEHICLES C 46 mQh
NC1NWEAVING VEHICLES C 52 mph
aPERR7TQN OF WEAVING AREA IS CnNSTRAINE❑
ANALYZED MRXIMUM
WEAVING voLUME ( vw ) . . 1,727 i 1ao0
WoLuME RaT r❑ ( vR ) . . . . 0.39 0.35 Exc~EDs MAx
WEAVING RATYO ( R ) . . . . 0.32 0.50
WEAVING LENGTH (L) . . , 2,194 2,000 EX~~ED5 MA34
F
' 1985 HcM:RAMP atiaLYSZS PAGE 1
FACILITY LACATION,... I-90 WB EVERGREEN TO PTNES
ANALYST TODD R. WHIPPLE
TTME OF ANALYSIS...., YR 2000 PM PEAK HOUR
DA3E OF ANALYSIS..... 1/30/89
O7HER INFORMATION..:. AT EUERGREEN W8 ON RAMP
A) ADJUSTMENT FAC70R5
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS 5(TYPical - 200 #/HP)
PEAK HaUR FACTDR .9
HIGHWAY DESTGN SPEEQ (mph)...a....... 74
(BU5E5 ANd RV'S ARE CQNSIDEREQ AS TRUCKS)
LEVEL TERRAIN
B7 INPUT INFaRMATTON
-----------------------------------w_-_--y____-_-------------
NO. OF LANES 0N FREEWAY = 3(per direction)
ANALYSIS RAMP CHARACTERISTICS=
(1) RIGHT-HAND RAMp.
(2) ONE LANE RAMP.
uPSTREAM ANALYSIS ac]WNS7REAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RAMP
VflLUME 477 2838 522 450
% TRUCKS 5 5 5 5
RAMP TYPE OFF N . A . ON OFF
DISTANCE 2400 N. A. N.R. 3500
~ 3985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 2
C) RAMP ANALYSIS RE5ULT5
7RUCK PRESEMCE IN LANE 1: 51 % OF FREEWAY TRUCKS
RAMP ANALYZED WITH UPSTREAM RAMR USING FIGURE 1.5- 6
WARINING! IM USING THFS N❑MaGRAPH=
Normal range far Vf is 2404 ta 6200 Vph
v1 Vr Vf
vPH 497 522 2361
ET 1.7 1,7 1.7
Fhv 0.92 0.97 4.97
PHF 4.90 0.90 0.90
PGQH 600 598 2704
GHECKPt]INT VDLtJME LQa
FREEWAY: 3302 C
MERGE= 1198 C
RAMP ANALYZEL WITH UPSTREAM RAMP LISING APPROXIMATION METHDD
Vi Vr Vf
VPN 187 522 2361
E3 1.7 1.7 1.7
FhV 0.82 0.47 4,97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
RCPH 253 598 2744
CHECKIF'Q INT 11OLUME LOS
FREEWAY : 3342 C
a`1ERGE: 851 8
IDENTIFYING ENFORMATION
FACILTTY LQC;aI"SON I-94 WB E1IERGREEIV TO PINES
TIME AND aATE,....... YR 2000 PM PEAK FIDUR : 1/30/89
Oi'i°3ER INFORMATION AT EVERGREEIY WB ON RAMP
1985 HCM.RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 3
C) RAMP ANALYSIS RESULTS (CONTIMUED)
RAMp ANALY2ED WI*H ODWNSTREAM RAMP USING FIGURE 1.5- 6
WARINING'. IN USING THIS NdMOGRAPH=
Narmal range for Vf is 2400 to 6200 Wph
Vi Vr Uf
VRH 497 522 2361
ET 1_7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.92 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 90
PCPH 600 598 2704
CHECiSPDINT VOLUME Lo5
FREEWAY= 3302 C
MERGE: 1198 C
RAMP ANAL.YZED WITH DOWNSTR'ERM RAMP USIMG APPROXIMATION METNtiD
V7 Vr Vf
VPH 187 522 2361
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.82 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPFf 253 598 2704
CHECKPOINZ Vt]LUME LOS
FREEWAY: 3342 C
MERGE= 851 g
zDENTIF'YT[dG INFORMATInN
FACILT7Y LOCATION, I-40 WB EVERGREEN Tc7 PIMES
TIME AND pATE YR 2000 PM PEAK HC]UR ; 1/30/89
qTHER INFDRMATION AY EVERGREEN WB aN RAMP
. ~
i
1985 HCM.RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE 4
C] RAMP AMALYSIS f;ESULT5 ( GONTINUEp )
RAMP ANALY2ED ALC]NE fJSING FIGURE 1.5°- 6
WARIhIIdVG°. IN! UsING THIS NaMt]CRAPN:
M1larmal rarrge for Vf a.s 2400 ta 6200 vph
Vi Vr uf
V'AH 497 522 2361
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.92 0.97 0.97
PNF 0.40 0.94 4.94
P"CPH 600 548 2704
~
CHECKPaINT VQLUME L4S
' FREEWAY : 3302 C
MERGE= 1198 C
RAMP ANALYZED ALOPIE USING A'PpRQ}CIMATIQN METHOD
V1 Vr Vf
VPH 187 522 2363
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fnv 0.e2 0.97 0.97
PHF a.90 0.90 0.90
pCPH 253 598 2704
CHECKP+DINT VOLLIME La5
FREEWAY= 3302 C
MERGE: 851 B
IDENTIFYING :Ct+IFORMATIf]N
FACILITY LOCATION 1-90 WB EVERGREEN Ta PINES
TIME Al4D C7ATE YR 2400 PM PEAK HOUR : 1/30/89
QTHER INFORMATI[7N.,.. AT EVERGREEN W13 aN RAMP
{
r
A
7 1985 HCM:RAMP ANALY5I5 PAGE 1
FACILITY LOCATIVN.... I-9e W8 EVERGREEN TO PINES I!C
ANALY53 TDD❑ R. WHIPPLE
TIME OF RAIAl.YSIS..... YR 2000 PM pEAK HOUR
QA7E OF ANALYSIS,.... 1/30/89
OTHER I iVFORMA7' I aN WB O'FF RAMP AT PINES
A ) ADJUSTMENY FACTQR5
PERCENTAGE OF TRUCKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 ( TYPical 240 #/HP )
pEAK HOVR FACTOR .9
HIGHWAY C]ESIGN SPEED (mph) . . . . . . . . . . . 70
(euSEs aNo Rv 's ARE cONsIDEREa As TRucKS)
LEVEL TERRAIN
B) INPUT INFORMATION
NO. OF LAidES C]N FREEWAY = 3 (per direction )
ANALY5IS RAMF' CHRRRCTERIa7IC5-
(1) RIGH3-HAND RAMP.
(2) ONE !.AlVE RAMP.
llPSTREAM ANALYSIS []DWNSTREAM
RAMP FREEWAY RAMP RRMP
VQLVME 522 3360 450 920
% TRlJGKS 5 5 5 5
hAMP TYPE aN N. A. f3FF ON
DISTANCE 3500 N. A. N. A. 2200
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALYSIS PAGE Z
C} RAMP AMALYSIS RESULTS
TRUGK PRESENCE IN LANE 1. 51 % OF FREEWAY 7RUCK5
RAMR ANALYZED WTTH UPSTREAM RAMP VSING FIGURE 1.5- 7
V1 Vr Vf
VPH 1236 450 3882
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fr,v o _45 0.97 0.97
pHF 0.90 0.90 0.90
PCPH 1446 515 4447
CFiECKPaTNT VOLUME E.aS
a1c~c~C~c~c~C~C]Kak~ ~K~K~Ic~C~C* ~~C~c
FR'EEWAY : 4447 C
DIUERGE= 1446 C
IDEIVTIFYYNG INFORMRTTC3N
FACILITY LflCATZON.... I--94 W@ EVERGREEN TO PINES I/C
TIME ANL} DAYE YR 2040 PM PEAK HOIJR : 1/30/$9
DTHER :CiVFORMATION WB OFF RAMP AT PTNE5
1985 HCM=RAMF ANALYSIS RAGE 3
C} RAMP ANALYSIS RESUL7S (CONTINUED )
RAh1P ANALYZED WITH DOWNSTREAM RRMP EJSYidG FxGURE 1.5- 7
Vi Vr Vf
vPH 1236 450 3882
ET 1.7 1.7 1,7
Fhv 0,95 0.97 0.47
RHF 0.90 4.94 0.90
PCPH 1446 515 4447
CHEGKPDIdVT V[3LL7ME L,DS
FREEWAY = 4447 C
DIVERGE= 1446 C
IGEMTIFYING INFDRMATION
FACZLZTY L.OCATIDN.... I-90 WS EVERGREEN TC7 PINES I!C
TI[`1E ANC7 DATE . . . . . . . . YR 2000 PM PEAK HOLJR : 1/30/$9
Cll'HER IfdFORMATIQN WE OFF RAMP -AT PINES
d
1
e
1985 HCM:RAMP ANALY5I5 PAGE 4
C) RAMR FIMALYSIS RESUE.TS ( GON7INl]Eb )
RAMP ANALYZED ALQNE USTNC FIGEJRE 1.5- 7
►11 Vr Vf
V'PH 1236 450 3882
ET 1.7 1.7 1.7
Fhv 0.9s 0.97 0.97
PHF 0.90 0_ 90 0.90
PCPH 1446 515 4447
CHECECPaIddT VOLUME LOS
FREEWAY: 4447 C
DFVERGE: 1 446 G
IDENTIFYING INFdRMF1TI[3N '
FAGILITY LOCATIQN..., I-90 WB EVERGREEN TO PINES IiC
TIME AND QATE YR 2400 PM PERFC I-1O47R ; 1/30/$9
• OTHER INFORMATIQN.... Gi6 Of=F RAMP AT PIME5
i
1985 qCM= SIGNALIZED IN7ERSECTIdNS
SUMMARY REPOR7
IMTERSECTION..I-90 WB OFF RAMPlSULLIVAN ROAa
AREA ~YPE_.,,.QTHER
ANALYST .......7aDD R. WHIPPLE
DATE.~........ 1/31/89
TZmE.~,.......YR 2000 PM PEAK HOUR
COMMEN,T....... W/O THE EVERGREEN I/C BUT WTTH THE PROPQSED LAMD USES
VOLUMES . GEDMETRY
EB WB N8 SB : EQ WB NB SB
LT 0 97 320 0 : 12.0 L 22.0 L 12.0 T 12.0
TH 0 0 1857 2110 : 12.0 LR 12.4 L 12.0 T 12.0
RT O 214 a 698 ~ 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0
RR 0 100 4 104 : 12.0 12.4 T 12.0 12,0
. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
12.4 12.0 12.0 12.0
AOJUSTMENT FACT4R5
GRpdE HV AD.7 PKG 8U5E5 PHF PEDS PEC7. 8L1T . ARR. 3YPE
YfN IVm Nb YrN min T
EB 0.00 5.00 N D 0.90 54 N 28.8 3
W8 0.40 5.04 M 0 4 0.90 50 N 28.8 3
NB 0.40 5.40 IV 4 0 0.90 50 N 11.3 3
SB 0.00 5.00 N 0 ❑ 0.90 50 M1l 11.3 3
SFGNAL SETTINGS GYCLE LEidGTH = 120.4
PH---1 PHw2 PH-3 PH-4 F'H-1 Pl-k-2 PH-3 PH--4
EB LT NB LT X
TH TH X X
RTI RT
P'C3 , PQ X
WB LT X SB LT
TH TH 7{
RT 3{ RT X X
Pa Pa x
GREENI 16.0 0.4 0.0 4. O GREEN 12 .O 55.0 21.0 0.0
YELLaW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLUW 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
I
r.
LEVEL QF SERVICE
E.ANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LO5
WB L 0.474 0.133 38.0 D 39.5 D
LR 0.747 0.133 40,5 E
NB L 1.156 0.100 143.9 F 55,0 E
T 1.043 0.592 39.7 D
SB 7 1.052 0.667 39.1 D 33.1 D
R 4.704 0.633 14,4 B
_
XN7ER51EC'TIDM: DeZaY ~ 42.8 ( seo/veh ) 'V/C = 1.045 LQS = E
i
1985 H9CM: 5IGNALiZE❑ INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REpORT
INTERSECTION I-44 EB OFF OW RAMP/SULL.IVAN ROAa
AREA 7YPE . . . . . DTF°iER
ANALYST . . . . .Tc]DD R. WffIPPLE
DATE........... 1/31/89
TIME ..,,......YR 2000 PM PEAK HDU'R
GaMME~T .......W/t7 7HE EVERCREEI~ T/C BVT I~ITH 7FlE PROP05Eti La4iWD 4lSE5
VOLUMES . CEQMETRY
EB WE3 NS 58 = E@ WB NB SB
LT 692 0 0 618 = L 32,0 12.0 T 12.4 L 12.0
TH 1 0 4 1485 1574 : LR 12.0 12.4 T 12.4 L 12.0
. R T 593 D 228 0: R 12.0 1 12.0 T R 12.0 ` i' 12.0
RR 130 4 44 0= 12.0 12.4 12.0 T 12.0
- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.(]
Aa.ICJSTMENI' FACTOR~
GRAdE HV AD 7 Pk4G BIJSES PHF PELlS PE❑. BUT. ARR. TYPE
Y/N Mm Nb YIN mi n T
EB 0.00 5,04 N 0 Q 0.90 54 1V 28.8 3
w8 0.00 5.00 Ed 4 O 0.90 50 N 28.8 3
NB 0.00 5.00 {V O 0 0.90 54 N 11.3 3
SB' 0.00 5. DO M a 0 0.90 54 N 11.3 3
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCt,E LENGTH = 120.0
PH~1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PM-1 PH-2 PiR9-3 PH-4
EB LT X NS LT
TH TH ht
R7 X Ri' x
Pp PO }d
W8 LT 5B LT x
TH TH X 7{
RT RT
P'D PD x x
GREEN 43.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 23.0 42.O 0.0 0.0
YELLOG1 4.0 0.0 0.0 L?.D YELLOW 4.4 4.0 {}.O 4.0
I
I OF SERVICE
L I NE GRP. V/C G/C E3ELAY LO5 APP. bELAY APP, Lt]5
E'8 L 1.114 0.358 100.4 F 57.9 E
LR 4.619 0.358 21.8 C
R 0.874 0.358 32.5 D
NB TR 1.116 0.350 76.0 F 76.0 F
ss L 1.165 0.192 133.3 F 51.1 E
' T 0.910 0.575 18.8 C
INTERSECTIdN= QelaY = 61.1 (sec/veh) V!C = 1.124 iL.,05 ~ F
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSEGTI0N5
SUMMARY REPORT
INTERSECTIflM..I-90 EB a~F 40 RAMPPSULLIVAN ROAD
AREA TIYpE .....OTHER
ANALYST....... Taa❑ R. WHIFPLE
DATE 2/1/89 TIME........... YR 2000 PM PEAK HDUR
CaMMENT....... WITH THE EVERGREEN I/C IN PLACE - 60 SECOND CYCLE LENGTH
_~_~-i------~_-y----_____-y----__-------------------------_---------_-__-,
VQLUMES • GEOMETRY °
,EB W8 NB S8 = EB W6 N6 SIB
LT 409 0 Q 294 : L 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0
TH Q 4 1218 1328 = LR 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0
RT 500 a 194 4; R 12.0 12.4 TR 12.0 T 12.0
RR '30 0 60 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.4 T 12.0
= 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
, 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
AD7USTMENT FACTOR5
GRADE HV AD.7 PKG BllSES PHF PED5 PED. 8l1T . ARR. 3YPE
Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T
EB 0.40 5.00 N 0 4 0.90 50 N 28.8 3
We 0.00 5.00 N 4 4 0.90 5o N 28.8 3
N8 0.00 5.00 N 4 0 0.90 54 N 11.3 3
SB ~ 0.00 5.00 N q 0 4.90 50 N 11.3 3
_-_--_____------------___-_w-______..._r-.......--------------------y_-__--------
SIGNAI SETTINGS CYGLE LENGTH = 64.0
PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH°-2 PH-3 PH--4
EB LT, }C N8 L3
- 7H TH x
R7 X RT X
PD PD - x
WB L7 SS LT }C
7H TH }t x
RT RT _
PD PD X k
GREEN - 18.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 GREEN 8.0 22.{} 0-0 O.Q
YELLCJW 4.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 YELLUW 4,0 4.0 0.0 0.0
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY 1,.OS APP.{]ELAY APP. LOS
EB L 0.784 0.300 20.8 C 19.6 C
LR 0.521 0.300 12.0 a
R 0.875 0.300 23.2 c
- hiB TR 0.871 0.367 14.3 a 14.3 8
SB L 0.797 0.133 26.1 D 11.1 ~
T 0.779 0.567 7.7 B
IMTERSECTION__-__-_C7elay-_--14 xr( seclveh )---VlC = 0 812-----~05r-rB
i,
1985 HCM. SIGNALIZEa INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPQRT
INTERSECTI4N..I-90 WB OFF RAMP/SULLIVAN ROAD
AREA TYPE .....ti7HER _
ANALYST....... TDDd R. WHIPPLE
DATE . .......2/2/89
TIME...! . . . . . . . .YR 2000 PM PEF1K HQUR
uC01'1MENT .,.....WI7H EIAERGREEdV I!C Iid PLACE - 65 SE+COidD CYCLE LENGTH
~ Vi7LUME5 • GEOMETRY
EB WB NS SB = EB WB NB SB
LT 0 BZ 270 O: 12.0 L 12.0 L 32.0 T 12.4
TH i 0 Q 1357 1540 : 12.0 LR 12.0 L 12.4 7 12.0
RT U 68 0 698 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.6 R 12.0
RR 0 34 Q 104 ~ 12.4 12.0 T 12.0 12.0
• 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0
• 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
v _ _ _ --_--4 rt _ _ -__-w___---_ _ _ _
AD3U5TMENT FACTORS
CRADE HV AD.7 PfCG B1J5E5 PHF PEQS PED.@UT . ARR. TYPE
Y/N Nm hlb YJN min T
Eg 0.00 5.00 N o 0 0.90 50 N 28.8 3
we 0.00 5.00 N a o 0.90 so N 28.8 3
NB 0.00 5.00 N o o 0.90 50 N 11.3 3
sB 0.00 5,00 N 4 0 4,90 54 IV 11.3 3
_____--___-____________________s-_---------______________---________--__-_
I SIGNAL SETTiNGS CYCLE LENGTH ° 65.0
PH°1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-T3 PH-4
E8 LT NB LT 7C
TH TH x 7C
RT Rr
PD Pa x
we LT x sa Lr
YH TH x x
Rx x RT x x
Po PD x
CREEN 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 22.4 12.0 0,0
YELLOW 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 Y'ELLDW 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.0
LEVEL DF SERVICE
LANE GrRP. VI'C G/C DELRY. LUS APP. DELAY APP. Lc35
WB L 0.511 0.092 24.0 c 21.8 C
IL.,Ft 0_ 44C3 0.092 19.3 C ,
iVB L 0.705 4.138 23.7 C 12.5 8
T 0.838 4.538 10.3 8
B
5E T 0.876 4.585 10.2 8 11.4
R 0.860 0.523 14.5 8
~ ----------------------_-_--___-____________s.__-__,____.r,_-_---_---
INTERSECITION: DelaY = 12.2 ( sec/ueh ) V'/C = 0.805 LC]S = B
!
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED TNTERSECTIQNS
SUMMARY REPORZ
INrERSECTION..EB aFF RAMP/EVERGREEN ROpD
AREA tYPE .....aTHER
ANALYST....... TOQD R. WHIQPLE
DATE.1 .......,2/8/$9
TIME.I»....,..YR 2000 PM PK HR-
C4MMENT....... WITH THE PRflPOSEa LAND USES
VOLUMES . GEOMETRY
Eg Wg N8 Se ; ES WE NB 58
LT 425 4 4 486 : L 12.4 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0
TH 0 dJ 348 370 : LR 12.4 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0
RT 1144 4 52 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
R R 70 C} 26 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0
. 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
,.7 ______--_s____--_________--____-----_---_-__-------_--______----__-__-__
j AqJuSYMENr FAcroRs
i RAI]E '-~V AD.7 P1CG BUSES PHF AEDS PE~3 . 6EJ7 , ARR.TY~'~
(n) Y/N Nm Nh Y/N mi n T
~S 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 b 14 19.8 3
WS 0.00 5.00 N 47 0 0.90 0 IV 19.8 3
NH 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 0 €4 11.3 3
58 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 11.3 3
SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0
PH-3 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 FH-4
Ee LT X N@ LT
TH TH X
RT X RT x
PD Pt7
WB LT 56 LT X
TH 78-! }C k
~T Rr
pn Pa x x
GREEN 37,4 0.4 C].GJ 0.0 GREEiV 14.0 20.0 0.0 0.0
YELLDW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0
I
I LEVEL OF SERV7CE
LANE GRP. IAJC G/C DELAY LOS APP. bELAY APP. Lo5
EB L 0.559 0.283 15,2 c 15.9 C
LR 0.738 0.283 16.5 C
N8 T 0.930 0.233 31.3 D 29.4 D
R 0.037 0,517 4.6 A .
se 0.957 0.333 35.0 f] 21.5 C
r 0.374 0.617 3.8 ~
~ ----W~.-__-----_-----__.~___.~________.~___~._.~-___-----__~.___-___-----
IfVTERSECTTON: ❑elay ~ 21.6 ( sec/veh ) VEC = 0.877 LC]S = C
i
1985 HCM: 5IGNALIZE4 INTERSECTIOWS
SLIMMARY REpOR7
INTERSECTION..WB ❑FF RAMP/EVERGREEN ROAD
AREA TiYPE . . . . .OTHER
ANAI._YSl' , . . . . . . TAbD R , WFfTPPLE
DRi'E . . . . . . . _ . .2/8/F39
YTME - - - - - . . . . .YR 20(]0 PM PEo4K F°lR
CQMMENI T....... WITH PF2QPSED LAND LJSES ANQ EVERGREEN Y/C
UOLUMES . GE4NiE TRY
EB WB N8 SB : ES WS NB 5S
LT 0 23 75 4: 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.4 T 12.0
TFi 0 0 698 856 a 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0
R7 O 454 0 447 : 12.0 12.4 12.0 12.0
RR 0 225 0 220 : 12.0 12.4 12.0 12.0
- 12.0 12.4 12.(} 12.0
I • 12.0 12.4 12.0 12,0
_i ~.__~.-,___-__-----------------.~.~_-_--__-______.~_____w----------____~._
AD TUSTMENT FAC7C]RS
GRADE HV A[?3 PkCG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. 8iJ7 . ARR. TYPE
• ( ( % ) Y/iV Nm Nb Y/IV mi n T
EI3 0.00 5.00 N 4 0 0.90 0 N 19.8 3
W@ 0.00 5.00 N 0 Q 0.90 0 N 19.8 3
NS 0.00 2.00 N 0 a 4.90 50 iV 11.3 3
S8 ia.00 2.00 iV 0 4 0.90 0 N 11a3 3
_-____--------__-_-_-__v_--____-______________--_--------_----
S IGNAL SETT INGS CYCLE LENG1'H ~ 61. 4
pH--1 PH-2 PhE-3 P'H-4 PH-11 PH-2 PH-3 PH--4
- Es Lr NS Lz x
TN TH x
RT RT
P[7 PD x
WB LT X S8 LT
7H TFi x
RT }S RT X
P❑ Pp
GREEiJ 13.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 GREEN 5.0 34.0 0.0 0.0
YELLOW 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 3.0 3.4 0.4 0.0
----___-__-_--___r--____-y__---_ -
I LEVEL 4F SERVTCE
LANE GRP, V/C G/C DELAY LO5 AQP. DELAY AF'P. L45
WE3 L 0.080 0.213 14.6 8 21.8 C
R 0.840 0.213 22.6 G
rrE L 0.601 0.082 25.5 D 10.8
~
T 0.781 0.557 9.3 8
S8 ~ 3 0.958 0.557 20.3 C 16.3 c
R 0.216 0,770 1.3 A
---------------.a___..,..__y-__----------_________----------______-_
ThITERSECTIOEV : De1aY = 14.9 ( sec/Ueh) 11lC = 0.884 L(15 = B
i
I
1985 Ic~: sz-NALrZEO INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY REPDRT
TNTERSECTIQN..INDIANA AVENUE/SULLIVAN ROAn
~
AREA TIYPE. . . . .~3T'HER
~1NAL~'S~T . . . . . . .`~0'~a R. WMIF'RLE
~?ATE.......... 2/1/89
TIME. .I . , , . . , . . YR 2000 PM PEAK
CDMMENT .....,.W/0 EUERGREEN I/C BUT WI1'H THE PRC7POSED L.AND USES
-
VQLLJMES • GE(7METRY
EB we NB 5B E8 WB NB SB
LT 394 448 1111 40 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L. 32.4 L 12.0
TH ~6 216 820 1585 = L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0
RT 855 8l 145 238 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12 .0
RR 100 aa 75 154 = R 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 Y 12.0
; R 32.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0
. 12.4 12.0 12.0 12.4
- r__--_~,----------_~._--_------_
~ -------___.~~.~..._.~_o---- ~B.~U5~'MENT FAG~~RS
CaRADE HV A❑,7 P}CG BUSES F'HF P'EDS F'ED. RUT. ARF2. TYPE
Y/N Nm Nb Y/N mirt T
EB 0.40 5.04 N 4 O 0.90 54 N 31. B 3
W8 0.00 5.04 N 0 0 0.90 5D N 31.8 3
NB 0.00 5.04 N 0 O 0.94 50 N 34.8 3
aB 4.40 5.00 N 0 4 0.90 so N 34.8 3
SIGNAL SET7INGS CYCLE LE3VGTH = 164.0
P!°i°1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PMyl P'hI-2 PH-3 PH-4
E$ LT X NS LT X
- TH }C TH
RT ?C RT 3{
Pa x PD x
ws LT x ss LT x
TH x TH X
RT RT X
P[3 X PD X
GREE€V 21.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 C.-,REEN 55.0 49.0 0.0 0.0
YELLOW 4.0 4,0 0.0 4.0 YELLOW 4,0 4.4 0.0 0.0
LEVEL OF 5ERVICE
LACIE GEtP. 11lC G/C DELAY LO5 APQ. DELAY APP.LO5
EB L 1.112 0.128 129.5 F 58.7 E
T 0.129 4.128 41.0 E
' R 0.642 0.463 22.3 c
WE 'L 1.154 0.140 149.0 F 110.4 F
T 0.512 0.140 42o$ E
R 0.452 0,439 17.1 G
Ng 1.197 4.335 153.7 F 100.3 F
T 0.813 4.335 34.8 D '
R 0.112 0.476 15.4 C
SB L 0.089 0.294 31.5 D 108.0 F
T 1.164 0.299 114.6 F
R 0.156 0.427 18.7 c
~ ------r..-r____---_-------..-_-_._....-___.,_,_-_-,.y..,.-_-_.r----------...__--
IN7ERSECTION- aelay =95.1 (sec/veh) v/C = 1.341 LvS = F
i
2985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
SUMMARY RERORT
INTERSECTZQN,.INDTANA AVENUE/SULLIVAN ROAD
AREA TYPE..,..vTHER
ANALYST....... TOQD R. WHIPPLE
DATE.,........ 2/2/89
TIME YR 2400 PM PEAK
COMMENT....... WITH EVERGREEN T/C IN PLAGE - 120 SECOND CYCLE LENGTH
G❑LUME5 . GEOMETRY
EB WH N6 Se = EB WB NS 5B
L7 394 373 460 40 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12,0 L 12.0
7H 26 140 820 1505 : L 12.0 L 12.4 L 12.0 T 12.0
RT 3'60 81 345 238 : fi 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0
RR 100 50 75 150 = R 12.0 T 12.0• T 12.0 7 12.0
: R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12,0 R 12.0
- 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
,
' Ab7USTMENT FACTOR5
GRADE H►l PsDJ PKG 61J5E5 PHF PEDS PED.BU"F . ARR. TYPE
C%3 YIiV iVm Nb Y/3V m i, n T
EB 0.04 5. C7fJ N 0 4 0.90 s0 N 32.5 3
W6 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 IV 32.5 3
N8 0.00 5.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 N 32.5 3
58 ~ d.QL 5.00 N 0 t? 0.90 50 N 32.5 3
--___..-_--------------__--____.,__------__o_____--W
' SZGNAL 5ETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.(7
PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PFi-2 PH-3 PH-4
EB LT X NB LT 7C
7H TH 5C X
RT x R T X X
PD x Po x x
W8 LT x 5$ LT X
T H 7( T H 7C
RT 7{ RT X
PD x PD x
GREEN 16.4 16.47 4.0 4.0 GREEN 21.0 43.0 4.0 0.0
YELLOW 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 YELLCIW 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.Q
LEVEL aF SERVICE
LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LaS ARP. IDELAY APP. Lc35
- EB L 1.068 0.133 94.7 F 64.0 F
T 0.123 0.133 29.6 U
Ft 0.334 0.308 20.7 C
W8 ~ L 1.011 0.133 75.8 F 60.6 F
~ T 0.349 0.133 30.7 D
R 0.047 0.492 10.3 a
NS L, 0.950 0.175 56.1 E 25.5 D
T 0.481 0.567 10.1 e
R 0.077 0.700 3.7 A
58 L 0.800 0.033 79.1 F 34.1 D
T 0.975 0.358 34.2 D
R 0_136 0.492 ' 10.7 B
----...,__s...-----------------~--_-y-_..._______------------__-----_-___--------
IIVTERSECTZaN : Delar = 39.5 ( secIveh ) VIC = 0.665 LOS = D
i
SIT[ TRAffiC ANAIYSIS
SgliiVAN PARK CENUR
Spukane.0 Washington
SPD"R MAII ASSOCIATfS
GHfiNfR fN ViRUNNfN TA I
II I
St If TRA FFIC A NA I YSIS
tor
SlillUN PA RK CfN TIR
Spokang, Washingtnn
prepared fnp
SPDKANf MAII ASSOCIATIS
by
GRfiNfR fN VIRONNfN TAI
SHfiNfO ENGINEfRING MOCK INC.
SfP T 1979
,
TABLE aF CDNTEIUTS
Page
I. INTROi7T,]CTION AN,t] 5i]MMARY 1
TI. SITE ACGESSIBILITY g
T I x. PRIMARY TRADE AREA 12
IV. PQPULATION D$S'I'RIS[]TION WITHI1V THE TRADE AREA 16
' V. DIRECTZ0N5 OF APPROACH 1$
FII. ESTIMATED SI'I'E ARFt-'~ TRAFFIC 20
~ I
V- I, ACCESS AND RQADWAY REQLIZREMENTS 24
i
~
i
~
LIST OF TABLES
3UMBER TITLE PAGE
1. Summary of 5ullivan Fark Center 4
Approach Patterns
2 Comparatzue Populata.an Trends 15
Sulliuan Park Center Trade Area -
Spvkane County
3 Populatian Trends: SuTlivan Park lT
Center Trade 5ub-Areas
4 I]irections vf Appraach 19
5 Weeltday Regiorcal MaI,1. Traffi c 21
19$3 and 1985
6 W'eekday Peripheral ❑evelopment Traffic 23
for 1983 and 1985
~
r
i
14i ,
F
. ~
LIST OF EX-IIBITS
NUMBER FQI,I,OTnTING FAGE
~ 1 Location Map - 1
2 Total Develvpment Plan 1
3 Adjacent Roadway Netwvrk 8
; 4 Aerial View of Site • 8
' S View Looking Sauth on 5ul.livan Road 8
at Inter state 90 Overpa s s
6 View Looking North on SuIlivan Road ' 8
at the Bridg+e Qver the SpQkane River
7 Aerial Vie►a vf Sullivan Rcrad Interchange g
With Ynterstate 90
S Vaew Looking East an Interstate 90 8
Frvm 5ullivan Road
9 View Looking North on Pines Raad 8
From Indiana F venue
~
~ 10 Aerial View af Pi,nes Raad Interchange S
With Interstate 90
11 View Looking East on Tndiana Avenue at $
Pines Rvad IntexseCtian
~ 12 View Looking Southwest at the Intersection 8
vf Pi.nes Road and Indiana Arrenue
13 View Looking West on Sprague AVenue at g
5ul].ivan 12aad,
14 View Looking East on Sprague Avenue at 8
_ Su11.i,van Road Intersectiora
15 View Looking South vn Sullivan Road at 8
, spraque Avenue Intersectivn
~View Looking Narth vn SuTlivan Road at B
I Trent Rmad Dvergass
17 Travel Times 12
i 18 priinary Trade Area 13
1
119 Populati.an ❑istribution I6
I
i, i i,
i
LIST pF EXHIBITS (contin.ued)
i
~I NUMBER FC}LLdWING PAGE
20 ai,rectians of Aggrvach 18
21 Average Daily Traffzc 20
' 22 1983 P. M. Peak Hvur Traffzc 23
I
23 1985 P. M. Peak Hour Traffic 23
24 Recnmmended Roadway Improvements■ 1983 26
25 Reeommended Roadway Improvements, 1985 27
I
I
~
~
V
i
; , .
i
MMA[}
1~
~j
V
Au I7D J'1
i I. INTROD[7CTIC3N AND 5[]MMARY
The Spdkane Mall Assaci,ates, a jai.nt venture comprised of the
, Edward J. I]eBartvlo Corparation and the R.A. Hansan Company, pxop4ses
to construct a regional shapping center to be known as SuI.I.ivan Park
Center in Spakane Cvunty, Washingtvn. The mall will accupy a 110-
acre traGt lqcated appxoximately in the northwest quadrant of the
Sullivan RQad and Interstate 90 i.nterchange. The development szte I-s
apprvximately si.x miles east of the 5pokane city limits. Exhib3t 1
shaws the regianal location of the proposed development.
The Sullivan Park Center is planned to contain four major
department stores linked by smaller specialty shops alvng an
enclosed central mall. The develvpment, scheduled t❑ apen in
1983, will have an estirnated initial gross leasable area (GLA) of
about 888,000 square feet an3 a surrounding parking lat ta accoma
modate 4,444 vehicles.
The site is of sufficient size to perrnit expansion and one
adc3itional store may be added in 1385 if market conditions are
favarable. ❑ltimate GLA would then be approximately 1,438.400
square feet, with parking for 5,190 veha.cles.
In additian ta the regional mall development, the sxte conta%ns
120 acres ❑f perzpheral develnpment which is directly adaacent to
the east and west partions of the mall site. The ultimate develog-
ment of 16 parcels of peripheral developmerat wil.l incIude, by 1990,
appraximately 330,000 squaxe feet of industrial/warehouse, 294,000
square feet of office and a 300-rovm hotel. The first phase of
aevelrapment in 1983 inc3udes 94,040 square feet of affice and a
300--room hotel, incated between the Mall and Sullivan Road. For
analysis purpases, it was assumed that the remaining peripheral
development would accur in 1985. Exhzbit_ 2 provides the total
develapment plan far Sullivan Park Center. ,
The follawing site traffic analysis, therefore, cansiders the
potenta.al traffic imgact of all develapment con~tiguous to the
5u11ivan Park Center site. The purpose ai thzs analysis zs t❑
evaluate the fal.lowing:
* The capahility of the road network serving the site
area to accvmmodate anticipated mall-generated, peri-
pheral and pro3ected through-traffic volumes.
* The efficiency of the site access system to accvmmodate
rna11 and peripheral vol.umes with minimal impact on thraugh-
traffa.c.
* The feasibility of impr4vements or mrdifications ta arteries
bordering the s ite whi ch would enhance e f f ic ient movement
of estimated traffic volumes.
l~ 1
1~
1 ;
e
BOUNDRY
PEND
r OREJ LLE ~
~ .
Co1Y11le LINCOLN
co ~ :
1~pERRY ~ a flRINER
~ -
~ Sandpoin
395 L
1 I STEVENS 1`- L
~ ~~i5•7 f ~~i 1 i ~y"M ~.r~~ ~
~ r
Spflk~ ne Coeur d' ~lene sANDERs
' LI RICOLN
I 9n
~ KsaTENA~
-~.-4
SPQKANE ~ SHQSH(7NE 10
eENEwAH
115 • I 0
ADAMS P WHITMAN ~ • _ _ _ _ v
L14TAH r
►
~ ~ ,9~ ~ CLEARWATER
~ T-
.
L GARfIELD
f
Le'wisIDn y /r
i 2 ~ `
wALLA Glar~csdtin IVEI
f WALLA~ COLUMBIA # ~►45OTIN PEFiCE j AS LEW15 L~^'~
1
~
Walla'walla 'wAsw~ 3 ~ r 0
, ,~,I.
, oREG 0 MrLES
~ SULLIIApN P►4FtK CENTER
~ $P(}k{ANE, WA5HIf1EG7()N
~ REVIVNAL LO1.ATIVN MAP
i SPOKANE MAL,L A55QClATES
` E7CHIBZT 1
~
The anaTysis includes consideratian of all relevant rvadway
imprvvements within the market area:which are detailed in the
Spokane Caunty 1979-1984 Six Year Construction Proqram, the 5pokane
Regional Planning Conference Tranpvrtatian Improvement Prvqram
(1979-I984) and the 5pokane RegianaT Planning ConferenGe Adogted
Transportation PZan. Long-range impravements indicated in the
Adapted Transportation PZan (beyand the first five years) are nat
cvnsidered in the anaTysis since the actual lvcation, configuratian
and timing of these projects has nvt been established in sufficient
detail to a1Zow their inclusion at this time.
❑ata Input and Svurces
Afield survey and data search were conducted ta determine
existing traffic conditi❑ns an the rQadways servzng the proposed
mall sxte. RecvnnaissanGe included observatian of peak hour and
average traffic COnd1tiDn5. A study was made to determine relative
travel times within the delineated area to the proposed site.
Current thxvugh-traffzc voYumes for site access arterials
were flbtained from the Washingtan Department of Transportation.
Prajected through-traffic vvlumes were based ❑n data abtained from
both the State Department of Transportation and the Caunty Trans-
portatian Engineer's office.
Data to project and distribute site-generated traf£ic were
based on figures derived fram the field surveys and recannaissance
conducted by Greiner Environmental, data provided by the Spvkane
Regional Planning Conference and infarmation supplied by the
Edward J. DeBartolo Carpvration. These pxovided an indieation of
the relative gevgraphic Iacation of gotential• mall patrans and
associated traffic impacts.
The 5ullivan Park Center's primary trade area was determined
by the lacativn ❑f competitive centers,highway efficiency, relative
travel times and distances ta and fram the malI site.
Pogulation figures for the Center's patential market area were
taken from the Spokane Regional Planning Conference's Year 2000
Comprehensive Plan, the Kaotenai County Pianninq Cornmission, U. S.
Census figures for Spokane and Kootenai counties and data supplied
by the Edward J. DeHartalo Gorparatian.
A site plan provided by the Edward J. DeBartolv Corporatian
establashed the sizer compvsitivn, entrance-exit locations and
internal circulation p1an far the proposed development. Estimates
of deveZopment-generated peak hour and daily traffic volumes were
based an on-site surveys of inbound and vutbound vehicle mavements
at comparable regiona1 shopping malls and trip qenerati❑n rates of
regivnal malls and the variflus land uses obtained frvm the Institute
of Transportation Engineers' report. Trip Generation. 1976.
~ 2
_ . ~
Highway and public transpartatian pragrams, fsve-year improve-
ment pragrams and canstruction schedules were taken fzvm dvcurnents
published by the Spokane Regional Planning CQnference and Spakane
County Government. ,
Method4lagy
Based an the above data, the faliawing analyses and procedures
were undertaken:
* A directivn of approach model was utilized in the mall's
potential primary trade area. This retail trip assignment
procedure was utilized to assign the automvbile trips from
each of the population zones (supplied by tne Spokane
Regzonal Planning Conference) within the trade area to
the proposed regional center. Distribution of the patron
papulation within the trade axea zones was determined on
the basis ❑f populatian conGentrations, geographic canstraints,
U. S. Census data and local planning reports.
*it was assumed for this report that the oapulation 1iving
approximately within the 0-40 minute isochrons t❑ the narth
and south, 50-minute isochrons to the east and a-lfl minute
isochrons to the west fr4m the sate wauld provide 75 percent
of the potential maZl sales,
* Futuxe traffic valumes and moVements were assigned to site
entrance-exits and bordering roadways. Assignments were
based on percentages derived frvm the direction of approach
analysis, tota3 mall-generated traffic estamates and
estimated and prvjected through-traffic mvvements.
* Capacity analyses were perfarmed to test the capability
❑f bvrdering arterials and the site's.zngress-egress
design to accommadate the projected P.M. peak hour
traffic mavements.
* Roadway and site access improvemenzs were proposed for
potential poznts of congestion indicated in the capacity
analysss.
Summary of Findings and Recommendations
The Su1livan Park Center`s area vf in'Lluence encampasses mast
of the expanding suburban growth occurring on the eastern frznge
• of the Spnkane urbanized area. The development centers vn Sgokane
and Kootenai Cpunties, two of the fastest qrowing areas in the states
of Washington and Idaho. Spokane and its surrounding urban areas
papulatian increase for 1970 to 1978 was appraximately 11.4 per-
cent. The total hausehold papulation wzthin the development's
area af influence is projected to increase from 131,000 persons
in 1978 t0 150,300 Ln 1985, an increase of 22.3 percent.
;
~ 3
Region-wide appraach corxidors for regiona3 develvpment-
related traffic are primarily Tnterstate 90. SulZivan Road,
Sprague Avenue and Trent Road {S.R. 290). The grinczpal airection
af approach zs expected ta be from the east. Table 1 summarizes
_ informatian on apprvach patterns on roadways adjacent to the site
for 1953 (1n3tZal operating year) and 1985 fvr the total development.
TAIlLE T
SUMMARY QF BULLIVAN PARI: CENT£R
APPRQACH PATTE'VS
- De31l;1 VBh1C1e iri`]S
Direction af r?pprdacn 1983 1985
Trom the north on Su31ivan Rnad 3,005 3,397
From the no~ -ch on a ines Rvad 1,073 1,334
~-om 1-he sautiz on 5ullivan Road 1,395 2,304
- F;om 't-hY soLth on Pines Roac - 1,335 ? , 3J.9
-~cra t-he east on Interstate 90 1'0, 857 2I,300
4 rom t.ha west on Interstate 90 8,2197 10,064
32,665 40,418
^he transportat-ion analysis based on the ob3ectives, dGLa
and r xocedures previously surunari, zed i_^.dicated Lhe fallowir.g:
May1 Develanrnen`
- * The zniti-al 1953 mail vperatian (appraxima`aly 383,000
square-feet of gross Ieasable L'lpor area) has a natentza1,
annual a;re rage weekday total vehicle attYaction Q f 23,416
da? ly . it is estir.lated that t'ie 1985 exaanded mai1 w"Ll1
generate a•tatal ❑ c 32,178 da 2.11 (annual averace wee {day]
or an Lncrease oi 3,762 venicle trips daily.
,
4
*T►av weekday mall traffic geaks are anticipated. These wiZI
oceur frvm 12:00 nvvn to I:00 p.m., sepresentinq the inbound
peak vf the day, and 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., representing the
~ autbaund peak of the day. Weekend peaks wil1 occur from
2:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. and 4:40 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Weekend peaks are nat critical due to lower through traffic voI.umes
on adjacent arterials.
Peripheral Development
* Deveivpment activities in the parcels adjacent t❑ the mall
comprise the peripheral development. The land uses fQr these
parcels are office, coramercial (hatel) anci industrial/waxe-
' hvuse. The level ❑f development assumed to be cvmpleted by
1985 i.ncl,udes 294,000 square-feet of vffice, 330,000 square-
feet of wasehouse/industrial an+d a 300-rcaatn hatel. The
combined peripheral development wiTl generate approximately
8-.240 vehicle trips by 1985.
* Traffie peaks assvciated with the develvpment dv nat generally
correspand to the peaks associated with the mall traffic.
Hor,vever, in order to present a worst ease assessrnent, the per-
ipheral peaks are assumed to oCCUr during the p.m. peak haur.
rnternal Circulation
* 8y 1983 Indi ana Avenue shaul.d Ue extended frDm its current
terminus at the western end vf the propased szte east t❑
SulZivan Rvad. (lndiana Avenue's geametry will'be-dictated
by c,hanges zn annual traffic vvluumes and tratfic demands .
at specific intersecta.ans. )
*A series ❑f four mal1 access drives (A. 3, G and D) wi11
be requzred to gravide ingress and egress for Sullivan
Park Center, Ma11 Access Drzve D will cannect on Sul.liwan
Ftoad as a grade-separated lQVp ramp prQviding the majority
of access to the ma11 site. The rerrcaining three access
drives will cannect to the Indiana Avenue extensia.n. Mall
Access Dri.ves B and C should provide a minimum af • twv lanes
inbvund anci two lanes outbvuxad to be separated by a raised
median. Access Dri*re A snouid be cvnstructed- as one-lane
- f inbvund and ane lane autbound. Access arive C shauld -
be signalized in 1983.
* Peri,pheral Driwe E should be evnstructed as a twa lane
seetion in 1983 fram Indi.ana Avenue south to MaJ l Access
Drive D to prvvide access to geripheral, properties located
between the mall and 5ul1.ivan Raad. Signalizativn is nat
required.
5
~ By 1985 Indiana Avenue shauld he extended to the east ta
~ a cul-de-sac at approximate1y F3ora Road azid a series vf
ten peripheral access drives (A-J) wil1 be reguired t❑
pravade ingress and egress fvr Sullivan Park Center. All
peripheral access drives should pravide a minimum ❑f Qne
'1,ane inbound and ❑ne land outbound (30-foot sections) .
5ignala.zation far perigheral access dri,ves is rsat required.
Externai Raadway Circul,ativn - 1983
~Su1livan Rvad/Interstate 90 Interchange, - p,n "Urban xnterchange"
is sequired tv prQVide an acceptable level af service at this
intersection. It should be canstructed as a six-Iane divided
section with dua3-left turning lanes in aTl quadrants of the
intersectian. ,
The "Urban Interchange" cancept has substantia3,ly greater
traffic carrying capacity than a cvnvsntivnal, diamond inter-
change and requzres substantially Iess rzght-caf-way. Bpt.n af
these features are erucial in the development of Su]. Livan park
Center. It shauld be noted that withvut the "Urban Interchange"
this intersection cou3d not accammodate the mall and pegipherai
densities proposed.
* Su1livan Road - This rcaadway shoul.d be carried as three lanes
nrarthbvund from the "i]rban Interchange" tv Mall Access Drive D
at which pvint it wiil drap a 1.ane and become atwo lane sec-
tian northbound acrvss the Spckane River. Frara the Su1livan
Road bsidge structure south t❑ Indzana Avenue. Sullzvan Road
sh❑u3d be two ] anes southbound. At the Indiana Avenue inter-
sectian with Sullivan Road it wil1 pick up a third lane south-
bound thrvugh the "[3rban Interchange."
* Sull.ivan Road/Inaiana Avenue - At the intarsecti.an of
Indiana Avenue, Sull,ivan Road shvul.d prvvide a left-turn
storage lane ( 30D-fvvt mininum) for narthbound-to-westbaund .
traffic. A right-turn stvrage 1.ane for SulIivan Rcad's
narth appraach road shvuld also be provided.
Indiana Avenue, at its intersecta.an witri SulTivan Raad,
shvuld be constructed as a four lane undivided sec4t"ion with
grvvisivn for separate left and ric3ht-turn ].anes for north
and svuthbound traffic, respectively. The right-turn larre
should he constructed as a cvntinuvus flow lane carried t❑
the "[]rban Intercharrge. " Signalization is required.
* Iradiana P,venue - At its intersection wi,th Peripheral Rccess
drive E, Indiana Avenue should be canstructed as twa ].anes
eastbaund and one lane wastbound with provisi,on fQr a lefty
• turn starage lane fvr westbvund-to-svuthbound traffic. Ac-
celeration and deceleratian tapers should be provided fvr
Peripheral Access Drive D. Signalization is not required.
Ati.ts intersection with Ma11 Access Drive C, Indiana
Avenue shauiri pravide a left-turn stvraqe lane far west5vund-
, to-southbound traffic. An additi.vnal eastbvund lane frvm Ma],1
Aecess Drive C shauld be carried ta Sullivan Rvad. Signalizatian
is required.
6
The zntersectians of Indiana Avenue with Mall Access
DriVes A and 3 shouid pravide left-turn storage lanes and
acceleratiQn and deceleration tapers. Signalizatian is naL
required.
External Raadwav Circulaticn - 1985
*S°allivan Rvad-shauZd be expanded by an additional lane in
eacn airectzon fram the Spakane Ri=rer bricge soutn
, ta the "F]rban In.teschange. " At its intersectian wath Indiana
Avenue, separate right-turn ianes are needed on al3, apprnaches
with the west-tv-south turn being a free-flaw faczlity.
- Separate Zeft-turn bays and approprzatz tapers are needed in
all directions, except the west--Ca-svuthbaund move*.nent frcm
Ind=ana Avenue ant❑ S u1 liva.n Roac,
* Indiana Avenue - s:~odlc be 9-,stendec as a Lwv-1ane yaeil.itv
i-rgfi! $Lllix'v8A Road ec"iS ~t tt] F1C?ra Road wlZEze z_ t?rm'_i.r1t°5+
in a cul-de-sac. west of Su].livan Raad, I^dian.a Avenue sheau? d
be expandeci 4v afaur-Iane divided faeT 1? t,y to Ppripnera?
Dy ive E. ciere 7.mdaana Avenue :Yi z1 taper _rom two ianes to
one I.ane in a aes Lbounri dirac 4ion. T'.:e -eerr.etrv of Injiana
Avenue r4mainsccnstant untsl it reaches Ma11 Access
Drive C where 4-t tapers fzam IC-ad la.nes to one Lane in
an eastbaund diwac`ion. Fndiana Avenue cont-inues as
atwo-iane 'faci1z t.,y t:irough zts ;ntersectiQn =.airn ?i-nes
Rc ad . ~ Peripheral Aecess Orives - Le=_-Lurn storace lanes wit-h
apgzcpria me r-aoers a=e neeaed on 7::d'_zna Aver.ue ar
P9ripheral Dr_ves A, 13, G a..nd 0.
5 umsn arv .
Th e imn lemen tation vz the recommenced acces s a~~it-ion s and
roadway imnrove:nen t's , toger:ex ai th the compi.etion c f pracramm.eu
CJF1strLICt1on r^+rv]aCts pf t.IIe lQCa2 3I`rd 5t3t
e aCeF'iCi 2s n73.ll DroV1ti.e
excell.ent access ta the 5ullivan Fark Center in 19-83 ai~d 19$5.
The addit-i.onal traf~.ic generated by the ? 385 expansion oy the
:nall will necessitate adc:i,tianaa raadway impraveznents '--,evond thQSe
recuiwYd by the 1983 deve].4pment. ~
7 -
:i
,J
r`i •
~ SIIE ACCESSIBILITY
II. SITE ACGESSIBZLITY
The accessibility of the prvpased development is deterznined
by bordering arterials, principal approach routes, pTanned or
proposed transportativn netwvrk irnprvvements, existing and planned
public transit aperatians and other existing ar p❑tential traffic
generators in the praximity t❑ the site.
Tharauqhfare System
The propased Sullivan Park Center is located on and adjacent
to principal arteries serving the site. Interstate 90, 5ullivan
Road and Pines Road wi11 be ianmediate approach rautes far potential
development traffic. Interstate 90, the majar east-west roadway,
affoxds-access for both Iocal and regianal vehicular traffic.
North-south access near the site is prvvided by Su1livan Road and
Pines Road. ❑irect east-west access t❑ the site is prauided by
Interstate 90 and the prpposed extension of Inaiana Avenue.
Exhibits 3 and 4 display the roadway network surrounding the
proposed development and an aerial view of the site, respectively.
' A brief descriptian flf key access raads is pravided in the follawing
paragraphs.
* Sullivan Road - zs a north-sauth, twv-Iane, two-way roadway
adjacent t❑ and sauth ❑f the site. Nvrth af the site it
becomes a faur-1ane, divided sectivn crvssing tMe 5pokane
River (as two segarate structures) until Trent Rvad. Exhibits
5 and 6 provide sauth and north views vf this roadway,
respectively. Exhibit 7 provides an aeriaT view vf its
interchange with Interstate 9.0.
* Interstate 90 - is afaur-lane, divided, east-west inter-
regivnal highway with fu1l access control. This facility
provides access across the entire trade area. Exhibit S
provides a view of the interstate laoking east.
* Pines Road - is a narth-south, faur-Tane divided section
which grovides secohdary access to the site. Exhibit 9_
provides a view of Pines Road 3aoking nvrth from its inter-
sectivn with Interstate 90. Exhibit 10 provides an aerial
view of the rvadway's interchange with Interstate 90.
* Indiana Avenue - is an eastrwest, twa-way arterial currently
terminating approximateZy at the western terminus Qf the
site. Exhibits lI and 12 provide views at this arterial
looking east and southwest at its intersectian with Fines
Raad, respectively.
* 5prague Avenue - is a major east-west arterial affarding
limited regional access to the site. At its intersection
with Sullivan ftoad, it is a six-lane, divided section.
Exhibits 13, 14 and 15 pravide views ❑f this arterial's
intersectgvn with 5ullivan Road. -
8 •
, ~
i
WELLESLEY o AVENUE RppO
a ~
0
a: &
0
. ~
0
a
0
o ~
a
g GOMERY
M ~
INDIANA
= SIT E
MtissIoN ,
Q o~ q~ AVENU
0
INTER-STATE 904
BROADWAY AVENUE
~ ~ SPRAGUE AYENUE ~
~ o
a > L` Y
w o ~
z o a ~ m
~ m SULLIVAN PARK CENTER
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON
- 0 ~ 2 ADJACENT ROADWAY NEIWORK
SCALE IN MII.ES
SPOKANE MALL ASSOCIATES
EXHIBIT 3
~
- -
HEWtETT-PACKARO
< , ki5
HaMCSTE~1D
Arx' .,yl' a5i ~ rR v 9~dy _
- _
SARkiR RD,
~I
~
SPDKANE VALLEY 911
6NDl15iRIAL PARk
Red Cisu,
Malw Mn
~ - suillvanf RQ
• ~~'~y` ' ~w_.
Fropdsetf K-AM1drt F~.,,>p
•
~ ~
T
4
KaISER ALt1AhINUM r ~
1
. /
.
YALLEY GE-NUAI
" H05PIiaL
4
FINE
~
SULLIVAN PARK GENTER -
SPUKAWE, WASHFNGT{]ry
BaSe Photo By Nort h AERIAL YIEVV OF SITE "
GEVSGE E. BQRDNER NO SCALE SPDKAIVE MALL ASSOCIATES
LAND RESEARCH
SUIiE 331-L1AVfNPORi MOTEL
SPO K A N f. LYASFEINGTOFA 99704
L,►~vIi~nIT 4
i£iEAHOhE Area Lode i5a4~ 6?4-~351 r,nia
* Trent Road (S.R. 290) - is a four-lane divided section
whieh pravides regianal aceess to the site. Exhibit 16
grovides a view of the Sullivan Road averpass at Trent
_ Ra ad . _
Futuxe Highway Zmprvvements
The degree ❑f patron accessibility is an important eZement in
the sueGessful operatian af a regional mall develapment such as
5ullivan Park Center. This accessibility eZemerYt zs influenced by
several factors inCluding l.ocation of populatian, traveZ time, site
location and vperativnal conditivns vf the roadraay facilities serving
the prop❑sed si,te. The follawing sections briefly detail the expected
rvadway improvements already identified by the local and state gvvern-
men ts .
' Shart-Range Praqrams
The Spokane County 1979-1984 5ix-Year Canstructian Proqram
and the Spokane Regional Planna.ng Conference Transpartation Imprave-
- ment Proqram 1979-1984 were consulted £or prvgrammed rvadway modifi-
cations in the site area. The fv3.lowing listing surnunarizes the most
significant highway projects insofar as they relate to vehicular
access t0 5ull.zvan Park Center.
* Sullivan Road/Intearstate 90 Tnterchange - The Washingtvn
Department vf Transportation has funds programmed to widen
Sullivan Road and the existing undercrossing to four-].anes,
constructing ].e£t-turn Channeli.zation and actuated traffic
signals at the ramp terminals ❑n Sul,livan Road. Estirnated
- cost is $1,918,041d.
It shauld be nvted that the Washingtvn Degar°tment of
_ Transportatian is currently considering construction af
a six-lane, divided "Llrban Interchange" at Sul.livan Road
a.n lieu of the abvve canstructivn. This prvpvsal will be
submitted to the Federal Highway Admina.stration (FHWfi) for
funding later this year. Da.scussivns with representatives
of the Depa.rtment af Transportation indzcate this is a
favored prapasal.
~ Sullivan Road - Spokane County is currently wid.ening
` 5ullivan Road to a faur-lasae divided section from Inter-
Istate 90 south to Faurth Avenue. Estimated cast is approxi-
mately $715,000. In 1982, t'rie cvunty plans to extend this
section_south to Twenth-faurth Avenue. This is estimated to
cnst an additional $600,400.
* Pines Raad - The Washingtrrn Department vf Transpvrtati.on
, prapases canstruction of secondary ramps extending fram
- the Interstate westbound on- and ❑ff-ramps to Indiana ~
Avenue to imprave the efficiency of the Pines Road i.nter-
change. Although there are no funds committed far this
project, discussiQn with representatives of the I]QT indicate
this graject will be submitted to the FHWA fvr approval.
9
Far the purposes ❑f this analysis, this construction is
assumed to be campleted by the opening af the mall.
Long-Ranqe Programs _
, The Spokane Regiflnal. PT.anning Canference, thraugh its document ' the Adapted Transportatian ]Plan, pr❑Vides needs evaluation and es-
tablishes przorities far future long-range transpoactatian prajects
in 5pokane County. Though no eompletion dates of design details
are avai.lable, the plan daes delineate possible future carridars
far expressway and arterial eonstructian. In addition to the abave,
state and county long-range transportation plans were cvnsulted
for raadway impravements which would affect site access. The
impravements are as follows : ~
* Interstate 90 - The Washingtan ❑epartinent af Transpartation
has tentative plans to upgrade Interstate 90 to a six-lane
di,vided sectaon at Sullivan Road. To date, no funds have
been committed far this pra3ect.
* Narthside Artera.al - CQnstructican of a principal east-west
arterial in nvrth Spokane extenciing in a southward directian
at 5toneman Rvad to Trent RDad.
* Havana Arterial - Construction af a principal north-sauth
arterial frnm Interstate 90 to Market 5treet.
~ F1ara Raad - Sprskane County Tong-range plans call for
cpnstructian af a bridge at the 5pokane Rzver, thus
allowing untnterrupted nortta-south access froan Trent
° Road south to Sprague Avenue.
Public Txansportation 5ystem
The Sul.livan Park Center site lzes within the Spakane Transzt
~ System's aperational transit area. East-west bus Iine routes
currently terminate at approximately Sarker Road providing oublic
- transpartatian fox the site.
Tne raroposed mall could act as a line-haul transfer paint and
majar transit tzip attractor for extended service to the area. The
deveioper fully supp❑rts mass transit as an alternatiVe to the
pri.vate automvbile in Washingtvn and has in vther local areas
cooperated successfuily with Zocal publie and franchised transit
operators to facilita.te extended transprotation service in mali
areas.
Majar Traffic Generators
There are a few minor cvmmerczal traffic generatars in the
general sate azea at present. The site, howeVer, is generally
surrounded by residential development Zocated pramarzly to the
south of the site. Residential development wiil tend to generate
vehicular traffic in prQportion to density.
10
The majar employnent center in the immediate site area is
Kaiser Aluminum, with a total employment of 4,259. The Kaiser
Aluminum plant is located north of the site an Sullivan Road.
A propDSed cQmmercial eenter located in the southeast qezadrant
of the Sullivan Raad/Interstate 9[] interchange wz.11 be a majvr
traffic generatar. Although this site zs planned for regional mall-
type deveTopment, far the purposes flf this analysis it is assumed
that only the Sullivan Park site wi1l be developed as a regi.onal
shopping center facility and that the nther site wi1l be develvped
as high density eammerci.al or residential activity.
Summary
In summary, the site is lacated in the northwest and northeast
quadrants af the Intarstate 90 and Suilivan Road interchange.
Superiar rega.vnal access is pravided by Ynterstate 90, ❑.S .H1gYtWay5
195, 395, 95 and State Rvads 290. 206 and 27. Imgravements to the
highway network in the Vicinity of the site will improve fl.ow and
capacity prior ta the opening of the prajeet in 1983.
Puh3.ic transpvrtation to the site area is currently provided.
Finally, existing and future major crammercial traffic generato~ics
. in the Interstate 90 Gorridor will l.argely be Gonfined ta resadential
developments with industrial and commercial develapments representing
immedia.te traffic generators.
,
].1
xzz . PRIMARY T~~ AREA
A market study was undertaken in 1979 as part of a general
site anal,ysis far the propased mall. It is weZl understvad that
the trade area is a prime influence ❑n the traffic patterns asso-
eiated with regional malls. A series of indicatoss, such as
population grvwth pattern, anticipated transportatian netraork,
access to the site, trave3 times tv the site, campetztive retail
centers and simmi].ar influences are determining elements in antici-
pating the mall.'s trade area li.mits. Thus, the pvtentiaZ trade
area fvr the prapased Suilzvan Park Center has been delineated vn
the baszs of accessibility gatterns, travel time and estl.mated
strength and appeal of the propvsed develvpment.
Physical Sarriers
There are na natural gevgraphic restraints or barriers to the
trade area.
Travel Time „ -
A field survvey was condueted t❑ determine relative accessi,Iaility
patterns wzthin the trade regivn of the graposed ma11. The relative
trave3 times ta the site, as derived from that survey, are shawn zn
five-minute isochrvn intervals an Exhibit 17.
Cvmpetitive Centers _
The rel.ative groximity and strength of cvrnpetitive scale
facila.tiss influenCe the bvundaries of the Sullivan Park Center
trade area. There is gresezatly ane rnajor campetitiue retail
cammercia2 Genter and twa minor centers within the Sullivan Park
Center trade area, as we31 as a prapvsed mall that would influence
the delineation ❑t the Sullivan Park Center's primary trade area.
The major cvmpetitive retail center is the Cera.tra3 $L153I1e5S
D%stz'iCt (CBI]) ❑f Spokane, Thie Wvrld r s Fair {EXPQ ' 74 } was held
in 5pokane and its stimulus, alang with the develapment of the fair
site into an urhan park after the cTvse of EXPO '74, has promoted
rapid development of Spakane's downtvcan area. There are presently
fvur majar department store tenants ira the CBD: the Crescent (Mar-
sha3,1 Field) with 425.000 square-faet, Bon M,arch (lallzed) with
213,000 square-feet, J. C. Penney with 120,000 square-teet and
Nordstrvms with 100.004 squareifeet. Late in 1979, Montgomery Ward
zs moving into a 150,040 squareTfvot plat lvcated in the narth side
of the CBD. A unique feature of the CBD is the utzlizatian of a sky-
walk system which connects all majvr department stores and several
of the large ❑ffice buildings.
12
~ i ~
L"ACA
PWr~
GYdIIe ~
PAiYO t~4EI E CE?LINTY ~ l.aRr
r S~K.CNF GAMGEM ~L'NTY ~
41
1TT • 6DrYNER
~
f ILkN KQaTEN ~ S IT
I
~ 01 I
~
CV&rsr ~
pENI ~yA lf Z C5 COIfINTY
~ l ~ CQL~sMtT 3
I I
Ga 1
30
~
N 15 ~5-\
~
9 Mi 1~ Rlr~r C R Ke
~ SiP AN ~4rsot I
~ sn~aa 9$ ~ .
~ 10~ ~
9(I 15 • K 0
20 95 Alard` L] ~
LaXa
- 25 ~ ~ 95 ~ 3
RRI~
30
C07iW~T 1' ~ ~
PARBLE ► G1pUNTY
35
[l+D~ I ~ ~ ~
RF" D HEIY'R ~ ~ 5
A 40 PWYMHR 3T MARIEB
45 u k4 Iku
~
SPACAl1E - RO~LIA C Y ~
N7YItlISMAI CD!!NT?' 0 Jr I0 YA8N~URN
AAiles r
• r
LiEGEN~ . SULLIVAN PAR~S ~CENTER
SPOICANIE, WASHINGTON
y15'-' RVINUTES E
lN M TRAT `L TIMES
$PUKANE MALL AS5DC4ATES
E)tH[BIT 17
~
The above center represents the ma3ar competitor of the area,
but there are two minor retail facilities that need to be mentioned.
Northtown is the largest of the two shopping centers and is situated
in the northeast carner of the Division StreetfWellesley Street in-
tersection. The center vccupies a 37-acre tract with 640,000 square
feet of comunercial area. Its majar tenants are the Crescent [92,000
square feet) and Sears {216,000 square feet) and is located apprax-
imately 10 miles nvrthwest of the site.
, The second facility is University 5hopping Center approximately
three miIes southwest af the site. This regional center is located
at 5prague and University Avenues. The current 354,000 square feet
af commercial area house J.C. Penney (56,000 square feet) and a free-
standing Crescent St4re {96,000 square feet) with plans underway ta
extend the mall shops to the Crescent Stare and to expand the Penney's
facility intQ two flaars.
It should be noted tnat a regianal mall (Valley Ma11) zs pra-
posed for the southeast quadrant af the 5ullivan Road/Interstate 90
interchange. The prvpased site is ta be 830,000 square feet ❑f
shogping area enclvsed under one roQf. For the purpases of this
repvrt and given retail market cvnditions, it is assumed that anly
Su11ivan PaLrk Center wil1 be developed on a regional scale and that
the competztive center will constitute local high denszty, coritmer-
cial or residential activity.
Delineation of Market Area
The primary trade area (the crucia3, ciose-in area from where
75 percent of the mall's sales va3uzne wi3l be realized) extends
north appraximately 33 miles to the Spokane and Kootenai northern
caunty lines, south appraximateIy 29 miles ta the southern Spokane
and Kaotenai county lines, east approximately 43 miles to F^~~~~a-' cvunty
linee and west approximately 8 males ta U.S. Highways 39-5' wnc 19~;.
As related to accessibility, the przmary trade area is .r,eneraii;r
within a10 to 50 minute drive af the Sullivan Park Cen-_ar
ment lacation. Exh ibit 18 shows the primary trade area for the
develvpment.
Tne Sullivan Park Center trade area encompasses partions of a
population growth regian in eastern Washingtan. ❑ata suppl-Led by
the DeBartolo Corpnration and Ioca1 and regional plannzng agencies
indicate the entire regian is vne of the fastest growing areas in -
the State of Washinatan.
Between 1970 and 1978, Spokane County experienced a population
gain of over 12.1 percent 4rea3 increase of 32,813 nersons7 to a
total of 320,300 persons, 1980 estimates far the area place the pcp_
ulation at 322,200, a 0.6 percent gain in twa years.
In 1985 and 1990, the orojected 5pakane area population total
will be 350,700 and 378,500, respectively. These fzgures represent
a 22.0 and 31.7 percent increase aver the 1970 census population.
13
~
F
~ 8 r l JLIH117A*i7 y
3
S31t11D0SS►d ,IVW 3NtlXOdS •
VMV 3OVd1 JIdVWIad
No~E)NiHsdM `3N►d?14d5 d38d WVai AlV1418d
U31N33 }lbdd N'dlAl-iif15
C7N3~3 -7
1~~1~115"V~ 0' ~ v NYN1IHif
.f 1 MliO~
N • ~vra~ds
~
~
~ ' saiarw :~s a~~wmd rrvld
d 5 Hra+3N~~ ~ C
AJknoa
N 9
4
06
3
6 tlr b a 11 A ~-LIS ~ V4 qJ ~
s q
N
■
~A
y
1
Mp8ENM
I ~1MIlP.? ,
961 I
f
d3NNoe ~ FfQ1AYlD
~ M1t
' (1LY A10is
~ n M RNryods J
0107 A lW700 ~ ze~a~o an~~d
arn~o ~
v++~ ~
n f V103~1 ~ ~ "~'I
~
~ L
~ ~
The Sullivan Park Center's priznary trade area has and is fare-
cast to experience a grawth trend similar to that of the Spokane area
with a populatian increase estimated at 34r489 between 1970 and 1978.
Table 2 cvmgares population grvwth in the development's primary
trade area ta the tvtal pvpulation farecast for 5pokane Cvunty. As
illustrated by the Tab1er the mall"s primary trade area is anticipated
to be vne af the majvr growth regions Qf the area.
Surnmary .
In summary, the SuTlivan Fark Center's prima.ry trade area is
_ delineated hy 5pokane County to the narth and sauth, Kootenai Caunty
t❑ the east and US 195 and U5 2to the west. There are no natural
features restx°icting the trad~ area. The trade area eI1C4I[1paSSE5 the
cvmmunities within parta.vns of Spokane and Kvotenai Couraties, including
Spakane and Newman Lake; and Post Falls and Coeur D'Alene in Idaho.
~
14
~
TABLE 2
C[]MPARATIVE POPULATION TRENDS
SULLIVAN PAkK CENTER TRADE AR-EA-SPQKANE COllNTY
1970 1978 1983 1985 1378-1983 1983-1985
AREA POPULATION POPULATION POPULATION POPULATION PERCENT GHANGE FERCENT CHANGE
Spokane Ceruntya 287,487 320,300 339,300 350,700 5.9 3.4
Trade Area b 96,538 131,027 151,888 160,300 15.9 5.5
N
Ln
Source: aU.S. Bureau of ths Census, Washington State i7ffice of Program Planning
and F'iscal Management and Spokane Area Gevelopment Council.
b Greiner Enviranmentall Edward J. DeBartoZa Corporation and Urban Data
PrQCess ing.
. '
IV. Pt]PL3LATi47N DISTFtIBUTZ{]N WITHZN THE TRADE AREA
Tn order to relate consumer distributa.on to traffic impact,
it is necessary to locate the trade area papulativn within gea-
graphic units. These geagraphic units deternine the appraximate
directions of appr❑ach to the mall development. The potential
population €vr the trade area vf thc development was da stri3auted
into faur specific spatia1 units that carrespond to access bound-
ara.es. Popuiation figures for I970 thrvugh 1990 supplied by the
Spokane Metro Area Year 2000 Comprehensive PTan, the Kvatenai
Caunty Planning Commissian, U.S. Census figures fvr Spokane and
Kootenai cvranties, and the Edward J. DeBartalo Cvrpvrativn were
uti.lized to predict pmpulation distributivn within the trade area
during the time perivd 1983-1985. The gevgraphic location and per-
centage at populatian distributian fvr each trade sub-area is shown
on Exhibit 19.
The locati❑n, poQulation and feasible access routes of each
trade sub-area are briefly described hel.ow.
.
* Sub-Area I - lies nvrthwest vf the mall site and is bordered
by the northern Sgvkane County line to the north, Interstate 90
on the south. 5ullivan Road on the east, and U.S. Highway 395
to the west. This sub-area has a 1978 pcapuZatian af 22,026
persvns. The major access routes to the development are Inter-
state 90, U.S. 395, and Sullivan Road.
* Sub-Area II - is situated northeast of the site. This sub-
axea's baundaraes are raughly delianeated by-the narthern Kavtenai
County line to the north, Interstate 90 to t.he south, the east-
ern Kvatenai Cvwnty line to the east, and Sullivan Road to the
west. Sub-area II has a1978 population of 43,470 persvns.
Major access rautas for potential develapment trips are Inter-
state 90, Sullivan Road, arrd U.S. Highway 95.
* 5ub-Area IFI - Zies sautheast of the development site. The
sub-area is general3y bounded to the nvrth by Interstate 90,
to the south and east by Kmotenai County lines, and to the
west by Sulli.van Road, Sub-area III has a 1978 pvpulativn
of 18,224 persons, Major access routes for the area are
prvvided by Interstate 90, U.S. 95,and 5ullivan Rvad.
* Suh°Area TV - is 1Qcated to the scauthwest of the site and is generally bounded by Interstate 30 to the narth, the
Spokane County line to the sauth, Su1livan Road to the east,
and U.S. Highway 195 to the west. The sub-area has a 1978
population of 47,395 persvns. Major access rautes to the
development site are Interstate 94, U.S. Highway 195, and
5ullivan Raad.
16
1
I R . P ,
COCOLA
~
- Drsllee
PEND DIPEI E L'dlIMTY CaMs I-`1
r SPOKANE p ~
~ BLAH ARG
41 ~
aAYTO~f BONHFRi
~ 395 ~
I couNrr I
DENISCIIi
T
4~i I ■7 3■
y I 34■ ~ •
34■
/
a
p S F
¢
4~n ~ f~ ~ 0 D' L
° 5PO ~ 7
i
Tp A 0
/1~ o
f
~ 3S ~ o '~4.'1 ` 1~
f •r 14,D
3 5.3 F ~ .
1 3'S.0
° couHrr
F 6EiVEWAH
~ A
5 . ~ .
A
PLAIA R P4UM[M S1: MARIES ~
~
L ~
SPRA'AAtE ~
JYHdTAOAN COUMTY o Jr ID
MASHBURN
Mi les ~
q
PRrMaRY YRanE aREa
5ElLl.IVRN PARK CENTER
(30r00/O aF TRADE QREA 1978 SPOKAfNE, WASFIIlVGTON
C) 0.00Io (3F TRRDE AREA 1983 PdPUIAT10N DISTRIBUTION
sPoKatiE MaLL assacI►arEs
C)0,00/o QF TRA QE AREA 1985
EXHlg1T 19
TABLE 3
POPL3LATI{JN TRENI]S : 5LTIaLIVAN PARK GENTER TRADE 5T.7B-AREAS
% Increase % Increase
Sub-Area 1978 1983 1985 1978-1983 1983-1985
I 22,626 24■914 27,251 13.1 9,4
11 43,470 51 r 948 54.502 19.5 4.9
111 18,224 21,396 Z2■442 17.4 4,9
TV 47,395 53,724 56,105 13.4 4.4
TOTAL 131,115 151.982 150,300 15,9 5.5
17
~
~
~j V. i7IRECTIONS OF APPRQACH
Directivns of approach were determined on the basis of the
follawing parameters:
* Populativn dist.ributivn within the delineated trade
area.
* Primary nvrth-south and east-west access alternatives
~ within the trade area,
E]istance and re].ative driving tirnes an alternative
i'
~ routes.
* Traffic canditions. arad service levels ❑n rQadways
serving the site area.
The nuanerical papulation and percent ❑f growth for each sub-
area within the mall's primary trade area were indicated previDUSly
in Section IV, Tab1.e 3 and Exhibit 19.
As previously nated, east-west and narth-sauth a1ternatives
exist to agpraach the site, [7se ❑f particular routes wilI general].y
depend an the geagraphic origzn of the trip. Howeve,r, aIl develop-
ment traffic must eventually approac3a the site via either Sull.ivan
Road, Indiana Avenue. gines Aoad or Interstate 90.
Directians of apprvach are presentZy samewhat constrained by •
existing li.mi.tatians in regivnal narth-south direct access routes.
The majvrity of the trade area's populatian reside east of the
development site and the existing east-west 1inks in the netwvrk
systern will tend t❑ direct thi.s grvup ontv Interstate 90.
The populations of the trade sub-areas are not statie. There-
fare, a change in the pzoportivnal distribution among the sub°-areas
will result in a redistributi.on of ma1.l-ariented traffic thraugh
~ the years. Additivnally, rvadway network changes can intensify
' these trade area populativn shifts.
Thereforer the traffic analysis for the Sullivan Park Center's
fixst phase [3983] assumes that any identafied network i.mprovements
currently scheduled wiZl be assumed to exist by 1463.
Apprvach directi.vns t❑ the site are swnmarized in Table 9 and
illustrated ❑n Exhibit 20. As can be seen on Exhibit 20, the ahsa-
lute percentages ❑f patran approach wi11 change from year ta year;
however., the dominant pattern wz11 remaa.n rel.atively cmnstant,
I
18
M
WELLESLEY ~ AVENUE ROAO
¢
D ~
~ Q
D
a ~
a
a ,
a
G4MERY
INDIANA ~
V" : 51TE
MIsst
q~,eN AvLrMtlE
~
. ~ ~ ~ `►L~ .6 INTER-STATE SO
~ 4
BROAaWAY AYENUE
~
a
o~
a
'a SPRAGLlE AVENLiE
c~
LL Y
[/7
b +y~c y N
~
LEGEND SL1LLIVAN PARK CENTER
SPOKAIICE, WASHINGTON
D-PERCENT QF 1883 TRIPS 0 M z P.M. PEAK
(0) PERCENT OF 1985 TRIPS
scaLE iN MsLES DIRECTIDNS 4F APPROACH
SPaKi4NE MALL ,4SS[]ICIATES
E%HIBCT 29
~
TABLE 4
DIREGTIONS OF AFPRQACH '
Direction of Percent af Trigs
Approach Via 1983 1985
North SulZivan Road 9.2 8.9
North Pines Road 3.3 3.3
South Sullivan Road 5.8 5,7
- South Pines Road 4.7 4.5
East Interstate 90 51,6 52.7
West Interstate 90 25.4 24.9
Total 100 100
summary
As can be seen frarn the figures .in Table 4, the shitt in
popu].atian in the trade arsa avear the twv year periad has resulted
in a slightl.y different development appraach canfiguration. The
CLA ❑f the regional mall wiZl be increased hy abrut 350,004 square
feet in 1985, thus, the ma1l will attract appzoximately 3,762
additional daily trips. The peripheral develapment adjacent to the
Mall is assumed to be total],y completed hy 1985. Th15 peripheral
development will generate an additivnal. 399I daily trips in 1985.
Far the purpase of a.nalyzing the traffic generated by the peripheral
develvpment, it was assumed that the general directions af approach
,were similar to thase calculated for the rna).1 traffic.
19
~
VI. ESTIMATED STTE AREP, TRAFFIC
Future traffic va3.umes in the Su].Iivan Park Center site
area will be compased of through, regianal mall and peripheral
development traffic Uolunes. -
Throuqh-Traffic
Thraugh-traffic valumes were projected to 1983 and 1985, the
initial ❑perati.vns yaar and the tltimate deve].opment year. Current
(1978) through-traffic data weresupp].ied by documents provided by
the Washington ❑epart~nent of Transportativn and the Spakane Caunty
Transpvrtatian Engineer's office. ,
Prvjected traffi.c vDlumes for 1983 anci 1985 were derived fr❑m
histvric trends and exa,sting flow patterns on the roadway netwvrk.
Anntzal growth rates were projected fcar individual rvadways based
on characteristics 5peC3fiC tv each {as coordinated with the Wash-
' ingtvn Degartment of Transpvrtation and Spakane County Transportatian
Engineer}., Consi,deration was als9 given to the passibJ.e gerterated
traffic prvduced by prvposed corrsimmercial activities located in the
. southeast guadrant of the Su1livan Road/'I-90 interchange. Exhibit
21 shows the average daily thrvughrtraffi,c in the vicinity ❑f the
site fflr the years 1978, 1983 and 1985.
f Mall-Generated Traffic
MalT-generated traffic was estimated on the }aasis of the
deveIapment's size and aptimum retail mix. This was presumed to
inclesde fvur major department strares in 1983, multiple specialty
shops and cartvenience gaads vutl.ets, withvut camparable Gompetition
within the ma11's prvpvsed trade area. The 1985 mall traffic
estimates were based upvn the same mix of flriginal majar departzrzent
stores plus the addI tiDll of ane maj ar department store.
For the purpvse of assessing the traffic impact of the deveI.ap-
ment, traffic volwnes were estimated based solely ❑n the grvss leasable
area (GLA) of the shrpping center. Estimates of mall-qenerated
daily and peak haur traftic vvlzunes were based ❑n vn-site surveys
of inbvund and outhaund movements at cvmparabIe regiranal shapping
malis and tri.p generation rates of regional maZls oBtained from
the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Report, Trip Generation,
1976.
Therefore, during any period of time when the grvss leasable
area of the anall remains cvnstant, the number of vehicle trips
generated by the mall wi11 alsv remain canstant. Since the rates
used far generating site traffiC are based on shopping centers
with estabZished trade areas, it is possi.ble that the actual traffic
at the new shapping center may not reach the estimated volurr►es during
the initial years of operation. HoweVer, it is standard traffic
pZanning grocedure ta assess the development at its greatest trip
grenerativn patential even in the initial years of operativn■ thus,
2Q
,
~
2800 3200 8430 2880
2660 2830 49T0 2640
la~ 460 4170 2210
WELLESLEY 13540 06640 AVENUE ROAD
12400 Q 6080
10400 o SI00 0
a
0
o ~
630 12330 10550 ~
15230 11290 9660
12770 1950
' ig 1790
1693 ~1500
1920 12010 ~4110
1720 10995 0
1390 922 0 14930
a 2480 ~ 13640 6T0` 300
0 ~ I 30 300 000
50310 3T760 760 GOMERY
46090 34380 p 21980 w+ ~
33600 25 ?4230 00 000 1430
I~` NA ~ .
1310
SITE 00 iioo
MISSION 24450
7gg 39 27860
2760 260 Q 308~ 0 503~ Q 3680 0 2g400
3780 4180 cr 21420 6T20 & 5850 10608 2710AV~NUF 25~ AVENUE
3390
2T40 3750 19620 ~g 5350 / 2480 22080 INTER-STATE 9~
t'
T240 9620 9010 5480 iV
~ o0p 4970 2zsbu
7 1 0 BROADWAY AVENUE
6500 86'~5020 6260 980 12980 2270
8480 7620 22180 332Q 17460 14420 19970
3320
615~ ~20030 2~~p 16000 111070
IT610 a SPRAGUE AVENUE
1194 0 ~ 30490 I p600 28680 0 18880 4790 18430 16120 0
9!f30 2626~ ~ 17290 4380 168T0 z 13520 ~ I6660 ~ ~z2110~ 7690 2202 a ~g50 ~ 3680 14150 > 19220 " w > 3 w o W J T730 Q '
z z
o ~ W
m a N m
SULLIVAN PARK CENTER
LEGEND SPOKANE, WASHINGTON
000-1985
000-1983 0 ~ 2 AVERAGE DAIIY
~000 - 1979 TNROUGH TRAFFIC
SCALE IN MILES
SPOKANE MALL ASSOCIATES
EXHIBIT 21
ir+.~~
ensuring arealistic examination of the traffic impact canditions.
In order to analyze the impact of mall-generated traffic,
it is necessaxy to examine the hourly peaking vharacteristics vf
a regional-scale shopping mall. `
Peak hour maZl traffic estiaaates were made to determine
pvssible roadway vr access design improvements if neeessary.
Traffic counts at comgarable regional centers indicate the
existence of three mall-oriented peaks.
The first peak takes place between 12:60 noon and 1:00 p.m.,
and represents the majvr daily inbound peak. The second peak
- ❑ccurs 6etween 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., and is partially attribut-
ab1e to the ter_mination af a mall work shift and the return of Iate
afternoon patrvns to their residences. The 9:00 p.m. to 10:00 p,m.
perivd corresponds to the end of the shapger day and is the vut-
bvund peak of the day. Qne af the major daily outbaund peaks
❑cGUxs duxzng this houx.
Weekend peak traffic vccurs in the later afternvon between
3:00 p.m. and 4:00 p,m. ❑r 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. However, week-
end peaks are usually less critical than weekday evening peaks,
" due to the reiatively lower valumes of thraugh-traffic on bordexing
arterials.
Table S pr❑vides estimates v€ inbound and vutbaund site traffic
based on an average weekday ma11 traffic generation rate and estirnated
peak haur percentaqes vf the tatal daiZy trips. Informatian is pro-
❑ided fvr the initial phase of develapment in 19$3 and for the ultimate
mall GLA in 1985.
TABLE 5
WEEKDAY REGIONAL MALL TRPIFFIC
- 1983 AND 19$5
1983 GLA OF 1985 GLA aF
888,000 sQ. FT. 1,038,000 sQ. FT.
TIME INBO[]ND OiJTBOUNI] INBO[JND C3[ITBDUND
12-1 F.FII. l,3br3 1,237 1r ~~4 1r 2g7
5-6 p.m. $,137 1,421 1,2$7 1,609
9-10 P.M. 426 1,563 483 1.768
❑aiiy 14,208 14,208 16,089 16,089
2l
• ~
The 5-5 p.m. generativn periad is the m❑st critical because
it corresponds tv the through-traf €ic peak ❑n the major roads
near the mall site. Inbaund and outbaund traffic fvr t.his periad
was assigned to the access systetn far the purpose of eapacity
analysis. Assignment of peak haur shapping trips was based an
the mal1 user arrival/depatture distributiQn, the location and
usage of access pvints, the capacity restraints of the surraunding
rvad network and access traffic surveillance cvnducted by Greiner
Enviranmental at comparable regianal centers.
It is impartant to nate that a 15 percent capture rate ❑f the
new mall traffic fvr alI years was deducted from the prajected
thrQUgh-traffic. The capture rate is that percentage of mall
traffic which is already using the transpvrtatign netwQrk in
praximity to the site for some purpnse. xt is those patrvns who
st4p in the mail ta shap enraute ta or coming home from their
plaCe of work or thase residents who stap in the mall enroute ta
ather destinativns in the vicinity. These trips do not represent
the intrvduction of new traffic, but rather the capture of existing
traffic zn the area. Sullivan Park Genter captured txaffic was
deducted from local thraugh-traffic for calcuiatian purpases ta
prevent dauble-cvuntYng of these mall-oriented trips. The source
of the capture rate methodvlogy used is Carl H. Buttke's repart,
"An Apprflximation of Regional Shvpping Center Traffic," published
in the April, 1972 ITE magazine. Traffic Engineering.
In addition ta captured trips, there are two ather c].assifications
of shopping trips, both of which add new trips to the roadway ad3aeent
ta the maZl site. The first (and mast important in terms of numbers
of txzps)t are the "diverted trzps." These are trips which would
be made to other shopping opportunities in arder to secure needed
goods and services. With the opening ❑f a new regiQnal-scale
£acility praviding a full spectrum of shapping 0ppOTt11I11ti25 , shopping
trips are diverted-fram-existing shopping areas to the new facility.
This diversion makes the new mall the focal point of numeraus one or
multipTe-stvg shvpping trips, which wauld have been made in the
zegivn had the new mall not been constructed. Such trips are new
trips an the approaches tv the regivnal center, but are nvt new
trips wa.thin the regian.
The ather type of shopping mall trip is the "induced trip."
This is a trip that is mas3e for the sale purpose of gaing tv the
shopping ma1l because of the c1QSe praxirnity of the patron' s trip
ori.gin and/or the multi.plicity, ❑f goQds and services kaeing affered
at a convenient location. These are txips (similar to a trip ta
a spnrts event) which wau].d nat have been made had the shapping
- mall nvt been there.
Peripheral Deveivpment Traffic
Daily trips associated with the varivus peripheral land uses
were estiznated on the basis of rates for camparable land use, as
published in the Institute of Transpartatian Engineer's informatianal
repart entitled. Trip Generatian, 1976. Peak hour trip volumes for
22
the peripheral land uses were deterntined fr❑rn the above referenCed
source.
Table 6 provides estimates af inbound and outbound peripheral
develvpment-reZated traffic based an average day traffic generatian
~ rates and estimated peak hour percentages of the total dai1y trips.
For the purpose vf analysis, it is assumed that the genera3 p.m,
peak hour is 5-6 p.m., where in actual vperation the "peak haur"
❑f these peripheral parcels may occur at a different time.
' °I"ASLE 6
WEEFCI3AY PERIFkiERAL DEVELOFMENT TRAFFIG
FQR 1983 AND 1985
1983 1985
QEVELC]PMENT ELEMEPdTS 5-6 P.M. 5-6 FJ4.
DAILY DAILY
' IN fli]T TQTAL Tt]TAL IN QUT TC3TAL TOTAL
flffice 18 139 157 1,099 56 434 490 3.437
Gommercial (hotel.) 132 129 261 3,150 132 129 251 3.150
Industxial,IWarehouse 0 0 0 0 163 V376 539 3,653
Tatal 150 268 418 4,249 351 939 1.29D 8,240
Composite Traff iG
Hy combining the assigned peak hour shapping mali and perigheral
develapment trigs with the prvjected peak hour thrpugh-traffic, the
impact of tQtal composite development traffic cara be assessed.
Exhibits 22 and 23 i1l,ustrate the 5-5 p.m. weekday peak hour traffic
fDx 1983 and 1985. The Exhibits shaw thrvugh-traffic, peripheral
development and znall traffic separately.
23
VxI, ACCESS AND RQADWAY REQL]TREMENTS
- The Sullavan Pask Genter aceess drive requirements and re-
quired external roadway modificatiQns necessxtated by the apening
and expansian Qf the rnall in 1983 and 1985; respectively. and t.he
perigheral develvpment through 1985 are dascussed below and sChema-
ticalYy illustrated on Exhibi,ts 24 ared 25.
Internal Circulation
The Sullivan Fark Center's inteznal access system must proi
vide for the safe, efficient, and canvenient interchange of traffic
between the sate and pulalic rvadraay systems. In ❑rder tv fulfili
these objectives, the znternal circuZation system should include
the fallawing design features :
* The internal vehicular circulata.an pattern must gravzde
sufficient ingress/egress locativns fvr efficient distri-
butian of an-site traffic.
* External raadway access pvints should be placed at Zggical
intervals t❑ minzmize the impact vE traffac ❑n thrvugh
traffi.c movements along public rQadways.
* Entrance-exits must aZlora adequate vehicle storage capaeity
an-site, and expedite the safe fIow of vehicles znto and
out o f the develapment.
* The site access systems should be co4rdinated with the
external raadway system.
Llsang these design criter3a as a guide and the cQnclu,sions of
this tratfic analysis, the fvliowing cQnclusions are made about the
internal circulativn system;
* By 1983 Indiana Avenue should be extended frvm its current
terzninus at the western end af the praposed site east ta
Sul,livan Raad. { Tndiana Avenue' s gevmetry wi11 be dictated
hy changes in annual traffi,c Vala,rnmes and traffzc demands
at specifi,c intersect.ions. )
* A series of fvur ma11, access drives (A, B. C a.nd D) wi].1
be required tv pravide ingress and egress fvr Sullivan
Park Center. Mall Access Drive D wiZl connect an SulZivan
Road as a grade-separated lvap r~.m.mp pgvviding the majarity
af access t❑ the mall site. 'rhe remaining three access
drives wzl1 cQnnect to the Indiana Avenue extensivn. Mall
Access arives B and C should provide a minisnum of twa lanes
inbound artd two la.nes outbound t❑ be sepaxated by a raised
median. Access Drive A, should be constxucted as one lane
24
inbound and one lane outbaund. Access Drive G should
be signalized in 1983.
* Peripheral Dxive E should be constructed as a tw0 lane
sectivn in 2983 fram Indiana Avenue sauth to Mall AGCess
Drive D to prvvide access t❑ peripheral properties lracated
between the mall and Sullivan Road. Signal%zation is not
regu:ired.
* gy 1985 Tndiana Avenue should be extended to the east to
a cctl-de-sae at approasimately Flara Road 'and a series ❑f
ten geripheral access drives (A-,7) will be required to
provide ingress and egress for Sullivan Park Center. Al1
' peripheral access drives shvuld provide a minimum of one
lane inhounci and one lane autbQund (30-foot sectatrns) .
Signalizata.vn far peri,pheral access drives is not required.
, This access system will grovide a system meeting the desagn
, features p]CeVlOl151y d15CuSSBCI. Exhibit 24 provides the i.nternal
access scheme and internal-external r,oadway interface fvr 1983.
External Roadway Circulation - 1983
Analysis fcar the 1983 prajected combined peak hour traffic
indicated that certain roadway imp.rovements ra~ll ,be necessary priar
to op~ning the Sullivan Park Center (see Exhibit 25). The fol.iowing
is a lzst of the recomrnended mQdifications far 1983,
* SulIivan Roadflnterstate 90 Interchange - An °'Urban Interchange"
is required to provade an acceptable level of service at this
interseGta.an. It should he constructed as a six-iane divided
sectian with dual-left turning 1a,nes in all qua.drants ❑f the
intersectian.
The "T7rban Interchange" concept has substantially greater
traffic carryzreg capacity than a cvnventianaY diaanond inter-
change and requires substantially Zess right-of-way. Brsth of
these features are crucial in the developmerct of Sullivan Park
Center. It should be noted that without the "Urban Interchange"
this intersectian cauld not aceommodate the mall and peripheral
densities proposed.
• Su1livan Road - This rvadway should be carried as three lanes
nvrthbaund from the °'Urban Interchange" to Mall Access Drive D
, at which pvint it will drop a Zane and became atwo Tanc secw
tion northbound acrvss the Spgkane River. From the Sullivan
Raad bridge stxucture svuth to Indiana Avenue. Sullivan Rvad
shaul.d be twv 3.anes southbourid. At the Indiana Avenue inter-
section with Su~livan Road it wi.ll pxck up a third lane svuth-
bourrd through the "Llrban Interchange. "
25
J
* Sullivan Rvad/Tndiana Avenue - At the intersect.ion af
Indiana Pivenue, Sullivan Road shvuld provide a I.eft-turn
stQrage lane (3 t30-fvat minimum) for northbound-to-westbourmd
` traffic. A right-turn stvrage .Iane for Sullivan Road's '
nvrth apprvach rvad should also he prvvided.
Tndiana Avenue, at i.ts 1I1ter5ECti0T1 with Sull.ivan Rvad,
should be cvnstructed as a fQUr lane undsvaded section with
grovisian for separate left and right-turn lanes for nmrth
and sautYihvund traffic, respectively, The rzght-turn I.ane
should be constructed as a cantinuvus fIow Iane carrsed ta
the "Urban Interchange. " Signalizatian is requzreci.
* Indi,ana Avenue - At its intersectivn with Peripheral Access
Drive E, Ind%ana A,venue shvuld be canstructed as two lanes
eastbound and one lane westhaund with pravision for aleft-
turn storage lane for westbv►and-to-sputhbound traffic. Ac-
ceJ.esatian arrd deceleratian tapers sYavul.d be prvvided for
Peripheral Access Drs.ae D. 5ignalization is not required.
At its intersectian with MaZl Access Drive C, Indiana
AVenue should pravi,de aleft-turn starage lane for westbaund-
tv-southbvund traffic. Ari additional easthvund lans fram
Mall Access Drive C shauld be carried to Su].Xivan Road. Sig_
nalization is required.
The intersections vf Indiana Avenue wzth Mall Access
Drives A and S should pzov?de left-turn stvrage Zanes and
accelerati,on and decelerativn tapers. 5i,gna3.ization is nQt
requi.red.
External Rvadway* CircuTatiarr - 1985
Ana3ysis for tae 1985 prajected combined peak haur traffic
indicated that certain rvadway imprvvements wi].l be necessary prior
ta ths ultimate develvpment af Sullivan Park Center. (See Exhibit 25)
The follawi,ng is a list of the reCVmmendex3 mvdifieatians for 1985.
* S~llivan Rvad- should be expanded by an add%tional l.ane in
eacn darectivn frvm t,he 3paka.ne River bridge south
to the "Urban Interchange." At its intersection with Tndiana
AVenue, separate right-turn lanes are needed on all apprvaChes
with the west-to-svuth turn being afree-flaw faci3ity.
Separate left-turn bays and agprapriate taQers are needed in
al1 directians, except the west-to-southbound mvvement fram
Indiana Avenue onta Su11.ivan Rvad.
*Indiana Avenue shoiild be extended as a twa-lane facility
frvm Sullivan Raad east to Flara Road where it terminates
in a cral-de-sac. inlest o£ Sul3ivan Rvad, Indiana Avenue should
be expanded to a faur-lane di,aided facility t❑ Peripheral
DriVe E. Here Indiana Avenue wiTl taper fram two lanes tv
one lane in a westbeund direction. The geometry rf Tndiana
26
* Avenue remains canstant until it reaches Mall Access
Drive C where it tapers from twv Tanes to ❑ne lane in
an eastbound directifln. zndiana Avenue cantinues as a
twa-Tane facility through its intersectivn with Pines
RDad.
* Feripheral Access Drives - Left-turn storage lanes with
agpropriate tapers are needed on Indiana Avenue at
geripheral Drives A, B, C and D.
Summary -
The implementation ❑f the xecommens3ed access additians and
roadway imprvvements, tagether with the coanpletion of programmed
cvnstruction projects of the local and state agencies will provide
excellent access to the Suilivan Park Center in, 1983 and 1985.
The additiQnal traffic generated by the 1985 eacpansiDn af the
mall will necessitate add%tional roadway imgrovements beyand those
required bx the 1983 develapment.
27
M [ `'t- ! 1``"'2.. ~ ►L.,.k tJ? ~~.i< ~cC
SPOKANE
~
~~~~~~EN~~
~~PACT ,sTATEMENm
September, 1991
Lead Agency;
Spakane County Planning I]epaartn~ent
f
~~OKANE VAiJJLJEi PLAZi i
;
- FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC T
~-a S'TATEMENT
september, 1991
~
Prepared fvr;
~ Spoksne County P ing Departinent
a
Prepared by;
~ InsHtute for Urban & Lveal Stuclies
; Easfem Washingtoa Un~versity
W. 421 R.ivex°side, Suite 421
, Spokane, WA 392(]1
i , 458-62I9
x~ ~ w~„ ~~s• , ,yy1G~ ~ ~
PA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROAOWAY CEFITAE 9lllLplNG N 721 JEFFERSON STREE7
PHOHE 456-2205
i~
`~'~;~±~~~k~`~•`.._;''~fE'7.h'ar„a~RE-,"• ~^"'P."r~ SPdf(A7dE, WA5HINGTf}N 98260
" srqnnwe crunrv couRrnouse
a.
1
S_ {Y I
I V I
_ September 9, 1991
-I
SUB7ECT: T.E-34-91
_ Tv Whorn Tt May Concem:
Enclvsed is the final environrnental impact statement for the VaUey Plaza projecc. We re.ceived
four cvnunents on the dxaft enviranrnentaT impa4:tt statement, which are addressed in this final
i,document.
- 'ihe prublic hearing far a change of cvnditians ta advpt a new site plan is set for September 19
, bef6re the Spakane Count}+ Hearsnng Examiner. At that ame the information presented in bvth
the draft and finial erivironmental impact staterraents will be utilized by the hearing vff"icers to
- reach a decision.
Eather Tim Lawhead or 5teve Hvavbiawski af the Cvunry Planaiing Department can be
contacced at the abcsve phone number for azore information.
Sincerely,
~ WAIIS D. 13- RT3
- Directar
SEP 1 1
~
. U" ~
FCY1-TE-34-91 E[5 TRAN51VCTITAT.r9/9191 _
- I
~
R TABIE GF C+DNTIIV'TS
" Cover Letter, Wa11is Hubbard, Spnkane Cvunty Flanning Directvr........ 1
Updated Fact 5heet 3
; Identificatian af "Mall" Froperties 5
Dr$f3E EIS Errata Sheet 6
IlEI5 Review Cvmmemt Letters & Spokane County Respvases:
- VVashingtan State Department of Ecalag;y Comment 7
' Respvnse 8
~ Washingtan State DeFartment af Transpartation Cammermt........ 9
' Respvnse IQ
Spvkane CitylCvunty Historic Preservatinn Off`ice Gomment....... 13
~
Response 14
Foster Pepper & SbefelmanlPrice Develapment Comxnent........., 15
Respvnse 19
. Distribution List 22
,
Appendices:
Appendix A: W&H Pacific Responses to WSDC]T and Foster 25
' Pepper & 5hefelman
_ ApPendix B: CH2M-Hill Rev'rew of I]EIS Transporrtatian Data.,........ 33
_ aad FEIS Respanses
Appendix C: W&H Pacific I7ata Sheets on I-90 Nnrth and South-...... 37
bound Sullivan R,oad Tnterchange
South Ramp SIS18
Narth Ramp Nl-IV18
~
~
' Fact 8heet
Site Locatian: Northeast corner of the intersection at
Sroadway and Sullivan in the NW 1f4 of Sectian 13, Township
25N, Range 44E, Spokane County, Washington.
Site Area: 34.84 Acres
8ite Plan: A community center shapping plaza with a maximum
- of 346,452 square feet of building area coVering 22.83% ❑f
the site, including large and small retail shops, and other
, cammunity retail services. Some of the smaller retail shaps
' would be freestanding structures.
~Buildisg Area: (3m Square Feet)
Retail A 107,325 Commtpnity Retail 1 50,300
Y Retail B 107,927 Cammunity RetaxT 2 32,000
Shdps 10~500 Cammunity Retail 3 20,000
Pad 1 10,000
- Pad 2 4,200
Pad 3 4,200 Tatal: 346,452
pff Street Paskiag Providedr 1,794 spaces wilZ be pravided
wfth the current site design, 1732 are required by the
- Zoninq Code
- Bicycle Racks Provided: 59
Landscaped Area + 208 Areas: 263,752 square feet cavering
17.3$ of the site
, Propanent: Metrvgvlitan Martgage and SecuritYes Co., Inc.
Tentative Implementatiun Date: 1992
~ Lead Agenvy: Spokane Caunty through the Planning Department
721 N. Jefferson St,
Spvkane, WA 99260
Respansihle officiaZ. wallis D. Huhbard, Planning Director
Contact Person: Tim Lawhead. Plarnner II
- Required L3censes: Zoning Change af Canditic,ns Approval,
BuiZding Pernits, Apprvval for 9ff-site Infrastructure
, Improwements, Appraval for ❑n-site InfrastruGture
Impravements, arnd Site Plan Appraval.
, 3
AuthQrs and Major Contributors: „
Dr. Anthony Anderson, Director, and Wende Walf, Institute
far Urban and LaGal StudiesA body of the DEIS;
3aseph Glawxtz, W& H Pacific. Traffac zmpact Assessment; `
,
l
Greg Eastvn, Pr❑perty C4unselars. Market and Economic -
Analysis.
~
FEIs, Date o€ zssuance: 10 septemUer 1991
7Day Expiratian Date: 17 September 1991 '
Public Hearinq Date: 19'Septennber 1991
Date of Finai AGtfon: 19 September 1991
Cast to Pub1ic Per FEIS. $7.00 per copy. Capies are _
available for review at the Spakane Pu3alic Library and the
Spokane County Planning Department
i _
i
~
I
~
~
I !N(]TE: A detailed rseview of the 1985 draft and final supplemental environmental impact
statements for the Sulliaan Park Center was conducted far the transpcsrtation element of rhe Valley •-Plaxa I7EIS. A backgrvund traffic growth of 3 percent per year has taken into accvunt the effect of ~
the SulIivan Park Center devekagment crn tra.ffic vaiumes m tYie area. The SuiliVan Park Genter is ~
located nvrt.h of I-90; taffic vaiumes generated by the tvvo individual projects shauid nvt cvnflict -
wirh one anQther on existing loeal roadways. Far a detailed explanation of the ua~ffic analysis and
rriethod+alogy see Appendix A of the I]raft EIS and rhe Appendices of this Final EIS.
. -
; 4
~ -
,
- IDENTFFIGATI4?N OF "MALL" PROPERTIES
Since 1977 there haVe been numeraus proposals with name association
and invalvement, and subsequent chang+es thereto, for majvr shapping
centers in Spokane Va11ey. This may haVe caused some canfusion
toward referencing the differeflt proposed projects. Therefare, the
fallowing autline and histarical data are included to assist
, alarifying the project identities.
SPOI{ANE VALLEY PLAZA
- .
The prqposal addressed in this ExS. The land area is apprQximately
34 acres and is situated an the svutheast side of the I-90/Sullivan
Rvad iazterchange and wraps around the Red Lion Inn property. It
. is alsv bounded by Sullivan Road an the west and Br❑adway Avenue
- the soutri. Metropalitan M❑ztgage & Securities Gv., Inc. is the
, owner-developer.
a
This prajeGt is on land which was a portion of the total property
- ❑f the farmer Valleu Mall proposal which is described in the next
sectivn.
, VALLEY MALL
- E`ar rnany years this prvpasal was referred to as the James S. Black
shopping center project. References alsv associated with this
, proposal include Valley Mall AssoGiates (VMA) and Newman-Brettin
_ Properties of Newgort Beach, Ca3ifarnia.
It included the 34 acres of the 5Dokane Vallev PZaza site p1us an
" additivnal 33 acres ta the east which is alsv referred t❑ as the
"Pring parcel. "
~
- SULLIV'AN PARK CENTER
; This project is camprised of 226 acres located ❑n the narth side
_ of I-90 and on bath the east and west sides of 5ui1ivan Road. R.A.
Hanson Company is the QrArner-deuelaper of this pr€sject.
Snokane Vallev Mal2 is a proposed regional shopping center by Price
Development Camparty from Salt Lake City, Utah. Price previously
had named the proj ect as the Snokane Galleria. The garcel for
Snakane Vallev MaZl takes up 80 acres on the western side of the
Sullivan Fark Center develvpment.
; Farmer assvciates of thxs prvject include the Edward aiBartola
; Corporatian of Youngstown, Ohio.
„ LIBERTY LAKE MALL
, The site far this praposed regional shapping center is laGated on
the sauthwest side of the 1-90/HarVard Road Interchange. Entities
• assoeiated with this proposal incl+ude the Liberty Lake InWestment
Group and the Cafarv Company of Yaungstown, Ohia.
5
spakaae valley Plaza -
Draft Envirvruaental 2mpact Statemeat
Errata
This section identifies errors that have been Pvund in the
araft EIS. EaGh errar is listed by page nutnber and the cvrrection is given. m_
Page 2 The correct Date of Issuance
I is 29 July 1991. '
i ~
Page 5. Paragraph 2 5gvkane Valley Mall shauld .
simply be Valley Mall
page 14. Paragraph 4 The Tapagraghy Map is not on
page 14, it is on page 15 ,
Page 18, Faragraph 1 5pokane Valley mall should
simply be Valley Mall. Page 18, Paragraph 3 The Land FJse Mag is not an
page 19, it is vn page 20.
Page 19, Paragraph 2 The Zoning Map is not vrr gage i 20, it is an page 21. "
Page 22, Paragraph 2 The CeI75U5 Tract Map is not art page 22, it is ❑n page 23.
Fage 24, Paragraph 3 The Landscaping Plan is not an ~
page 24, it is ❑n page 25.
Page 28, Graphic ° Floxa Road counts were
vbscured during printi.nq. The :
ccarrect graphic appears an page 6 of Appendix A in the s
DEIS.
Page 35 Table 3, and LC]S frrr I-90 sauth ramps, 1995
Appendix A Page 12 Table 4 with develvpment shvuld be L3S ,
~ E not TOS F
Page 37, Graphic, and ~ LOS far 1-90 south ramps
Appendix A Page 15 Graphic should be E/S not F/B.
Pages 49-52 , Delete these pages. They are
; located in Appendix C, pages ,
; 1-4. They were not intended
as part of the body ❑f the
dvcument. -
Appendax B, Between Fages The proposed Valley Mall is
25 and 26 noted incarrectly as the Pace Mall.
.
6
- DEI.S REVEEV C[)AIlIMENT TETIERS
` AND
_ SPUKANE ICOi711T'i'Y RESPONSES
,
~
~
' P
{ PnrI
yTA°fE OF WASHINC rUN
DEPARrMENr oF EcOLOcY
XIjil 5top PV-11 • Olympid, WashLVtoo 98S04-87 17 r(205) 4 59-6IXJl1
I_~•I E~ e ~ '1;~ lj 11 1,S ~
l j ~ i.1'ZI1.l~ r
A5.1gust 27 s 17'.41 { ;r : .~,5~i~ ,n
~
- 1661 4~ J(IV
~
F - a c. i r r 3.
~
' Hr. . Wallis Hubbard
~ 5pakane C4urtty
721 Nvrth Je$fersvn Street
Sgokane, WA 99260
ilear Mz. ,}iu6bard:
Thazik you for the appartunity to comment on the drafC environmentsl impact
statement far the Spakane Va1ley P1aza. Wa zewiswad eha DEIS and hava the
, follawing cvmment.
Constrxcrfan of the sewer canneat3_ort to the caunty line along Sullivan will
~ raquire review and agproval by the Deparcment af Ecal,ogy.
If yau have any questi.ons, plea3e call ,Ir. Andy Tom Qf the Water Quality
~ Program at (509) 45602875.
S irtce re ly ,
~=~~.~L ~ ~s~,~a..•G.~
. BArbara J. 3tchfe
Enviranmantal Raview Section
BJR:
91-4733 •
j,
cc : Anr3y Tam, ERt7
Ted Ha.mlin, ER[}
7
,
N=-57R'dd SciSH ~l~t? : al ONINNd7d ~.sNn= 3NaX0dS. W0~W
Wnn~~ashin,et.on 81&tP Depgrtrnent nf EUJQgv Letter - >
a
R,eview and appr4val nf the sewer connecti6n by the Taepartment is so nated and is
part oF the narmal operating pr'ocedures of Spakane County. ,
V
~
~
1
i.
. r
I I ^
I
~ 8
'
~ Washington State Duane eerentson
Department of Transportation Secretary ot Transportation
~ Districc s
North 2714 Mayfau Street
Spokane. Washington 99207-2090
(509) 4563000 RECEIVCD
Fax (509) 456-3089
August 29, 1991 AUG 29 1991
SPOKANE COUNTY
Mr. WaUis D. Hubbard PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Planning Director
Spokane County Pianning Department
Broadway Centre Building
N. 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Draft EIS for Spokane Valley Plaza
Dear Mr. Hubbard:
After reviewing the above subject the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOI) makes the
following comments concerning this DEIS:
~ 1. When reviewing a development of this nature WSDOT's primary goal is to ensure traffic
safety and maintain an acceptable Levet of Service (LOS). WSDOT believes the proposed
_ mitigating measures in Table 5 on Page 21 of the DEIS wifl not yield an acceptable LOS at
the intersections of the Interstate 90 ramps and Sullivan Road. To ensure an acceptable
' LOS, WSDOT in conjunction with the Spokane County Engineer's office will require
. roadway improvements be constructed by ihe developer. 7hese required improvements
shall consist of re-timing the signals in addition to one or more of the following:
~ • Installation ot an additional right tum lane ihat extends to Mission Street from the East Bound
Off Ramp
• The widening of Sullivan Road in the interchange areas and vicinity to accommodate 7lanes.
• The installation of "Slip Ramps".
~ 2. WSDOT requests that a more detailed traffic analysis be performed for the intersection of
Sullivan Road and Mission Street as ident'rfied in Table 5 Page 21 of the DEIS.
3. WSDOT in conjunction with Spokane County Engineer's Office resenres the right to
require additional roadway improvements from the developer based on a binding final site
plan.
~
9
Mr. Hubbard -2- August 29, 7991
If yflu have any questions regarding these comments please feel free ta cantact Mark Rohwer in our
District Planning Off ice at (509) 456-39%. ~
. , Slncerely,
J.C. LENZI
District Administrat6r
I
~ -
By: MARK ROHWER
❑istr9ct Pfann9ng Engineer
MER:gf
cc: 5pvkane County Engineer's Office I v'
I
r
_I
,
~
~ l
1 I_
10
&,panse to WgshinLytnn Sl&f.p Dppart;ment of Transmo-rtation Letter
- The fvllawing comments are o$'ered in respanse ta3 the WSDnT letter dated
August 29, 1991 in review of the DEIS far the 5pakane Valley Plaza groject.
-T. Please nate the specific camments attached in Appendices A, B and Ctci
this FEIS document frvm W&H Pscific and CI32M-Hill specifically
~ eddressing the points autlaned in the xeview letter.
2. The "mare detaiTed traffic analysis" referred to in this camment is included
~ in the wvrk sheets attached to the W&H Pacif c letter in Appendix C and the
_ resultant reviaw of this information by bvth W&H Pacific and C~2M-Hill in
their respvnse letters.
~ 3. CvmmenL sa noted.
~
,
a
1~
p
HISTC)RIC PRESERIAA`TIC7N OFFICE
(509) 625-6370
• ~ RECE1VED
ca AlJG 0 ? 7991
Sr'o
PLANRqIMGN,pEPAR7MENr
MF.a MQ R A NDUM
TD : TIM LAWHEAI], COC]NTY FLANNTPiG DEPARTMENTf PLANNER II
. ` ERC3M: KIT GARRETT, HPO ~
I3ATE: AUGUST 5, 1991
RE; SPOEiANE VALLEY PT1AZA, DRAFT EIS
Thank yaU for the oggvrtunity to review the draft Environmental
Impact Statement fvr the above-referenced project. As noted in
the text, there are na known sites of archaevlogxcal and,Jor
historsc signa.ficance within the proposed project tavundaries. We
` wou1d request, hawevex, that this office be contacted immediately
shaulc3 any artifaets be dzscovered during the construction
process.
Tim, please let me knaw if yow have additional questions or
-cvncerns.
, 13 sPOKaNE REGIoNaL COUrvciL
W808 Spokane Falls Baulevard, Roor°n 627
5pakane. v+JA 99201-3333
~J
I
BgMonsa t~ Histnrxc P"rpqprvation Oi'f'ice Letter, ,
Respvnse is so noted.
~
-
I ~
M ~
, 14
FC7STER PE'F'PE'R +9e SFiEFEL3vIAN
A LAw pARTwER4N1P IMCLLl04N4
PFil9i'ESSIOMAL S6RVIC@ C6gPORATIqN5
~ 1 f 11 TtdERa AVEM1/1.fE " SUI7E 3400
SELLEVUE WASNIAi[`.713N QFFlCE SEATTt,E WAShEIh1C,TON 98101 ¢pRTLAMl3 ORECC)N OFFICE
i, 12061 431-0500 S2061 447-4400 (7031 2%1 0807
~ TELECGPiER 1aD6) 455 Sa87 TELECQPIER I5011 221 1510
~ TELECOPlER
12061 447-9700 • [2061 447-928 3
TELEX (2061 32 002+1
,J ANSB1f FOS7'ER L+cw' SEet
. i f1Ugue.~t GOI 1971
l ~
wallis D. Hubbard, P1anning I]i.xectvr
• ' Spcakane Ccaunty Plannang Department
~ S 721 fi]t7. Jefferson Street
Spvkane. wA 99250
~ Fze: Gnrnments gn Spokane Va1,Tey Plaza
,
- Dra£t Envirvnmental Impact Statement and
_ ATlocatkan of Cost far Cvnstxuctinn
af Evergreen Raad I-90 Interchange
1
Deax Mr. Hubbard:
We are writing on hehalf af Pari,ce Develvpment Crampany and
R. A. Hansvn Company, Inc. tv comrnent on the County' sDrraf t
--i Environmental Impact Statemerst ("DEIS" ) issued a.n July, 1991 for
the Spokane ValXey plaza propased by MetropvJ.itan Mortgage
{"Proposal'"} . Erice DeVelapment Cnmpany and R. A. Hansfln
Company, Inc. have been the princxpal develvpers for the
~ prvpQSed Sullivan Paxk Center, also known in gart as t'he Spokane
Va13,ey Mail, which as situated to the arnmediate nnrth of
Interstate 94 and appro$imately one ma.I+e €rom the site of the
PrapasaT.
The Sullivan Park Center will be generati.ng its awn traffic ,
~ impacts an many af the saane rvads and freeway interchanges impaeted by the Prvpvsal. The Caunty has earlier cancluded to
thss effect by attaching as ane vf the condi.tieans of i,ts 1985
, approval af the Su1J.ivan Fark Center a arequirement far
~ canstructitan of a new freeway interGhange (the "Evergreen Road
interchange" ) and calling on the Ctaunty Engineer to prepare a
,'formul.a for participativn i.n the sharing of casts for roadway
• imprvvements in the vicinaty. " Price ~evelopment Company and
. the R.A. Hanson Company. Inc. riave implemented this condativn by
sponsvring a Final Design Repozt fvr the Evexgreen FnterGhange.
This involv+ed working on a covgerati.ve hasis with County, state,
~ and €ederal offcials tv deszgn an interchange which will meet
IqECEIVEI) .
,
zv
...,v,..~....,..+~~
,Ny,tiidG oEf
~
1
Spakane County Pl.anning I]epi artment
August 28, 199I I `
Page 2 .
~ -
agency critsria and accomodate the substantial increase in
demarnd antscipated frrom overall grawth in this area aver the
next twenty years. As the:DETS fcar the Proposal cvnstztutes an
important part of the County' s cantznuing analysi,s of this
area-wide road irnpravement, the followi,ng comments are offeredr
for cansideratian.
The purpose of preparing the I7EI5 is to identify the
probable significant impacts rgsulting frvm the Prvposal and to ~
set farth reasonable mzta.gata.on measures that would
significantly mi.tigate these impacts. WAC 197-111-440{6} (a) • 3
Based upvn the review of ~he DEIS by the traffic consultants of
Barton-Aschman Associates. Xnc., we believe the Final
Environmental Impact Statement {"FEIS"} should addzess in
somewhat greater detail bvth the direct and cumulatzv°e impacts
of the PragosaJ. Qn the surrounding rvadway system and khe two
nearby freeway interchanges, namely the existing Sullivan Road ,
interchange and the propvsed Evezgreen Road interchange.
There is no questian but that the traffic generated by the-- ,
Proposal wi11 create sigraif icant impacts an the adj acent roads ~ .
and nearby I-90 i.nterchanges. In light of th%s, aur traffic
consultants have the fallowing speca.fic observatians on the DEIS:
1, ane LeCDitliltiE:I7,dE..'d mitigati,on which requires further-I ~
discussian i.s how "updated signal timing" at the
two 5ullivan Road ramp interseetions results in
such a substantially i.mpzoved level of service ,
("LOS" The QEIS estimates the LOS to be "D„ and
"F" foz the; north and south raing intersections,
respectively, in 1995 wi,th +development of bath the ~
Prapasai and Fhase Iof the Su],la,van Park Center,
assuming the I-90 Evergreen Roaa interchange is
not campleted. The vnl.y mitigatican prapQSed - ta
„update signal timing Eor bdth off-ramps" - is
said to resu3t in bath 1I7.ter5@Ct1Qi'1S vperating at
L05 "B," As both intersectivns are naw ~
functzoni,ng as fuliy-actuated aperations, a3.thaugh
racat i.nterconnected to the County signa7.s to the
south, mare detail. %s needed as to hvw such a ,
great improvement in 1evel ❑f sexva.ce wi].1 lbe ;
accomplishejd. -
2. The statement that traffic Volumes generated by- `
the Progosal wiil camplement, and not cvnflict
wzth, traffic generated by the Sullivan Park (e `
Center, alsv requires further el.arification. The
addition of 526 northbound PM peak haur trips ~
generated by the Proposal thraugh the south ramp-
; ;
; 16
Spokane Caunty Planning ❑epartment
August 28. 1991 -
Page 3
- ~
~
intersectiran may complement 5ullivan Paik Center,
but the 456 trips that turn left at the n❑rth ramp ~
' intersection xs a conflict, and a major impact to
- ' the operation of the i,ntersection. ~
3. The use ❑f a 3°n background growth rate from 1991`
ta 1995 may account far .regaonal grawth; however,
this will under-estimate certain cxitical
requi rements wi thin the interchange. The
, eastbound left-turn volume at the south ramp
intersectian, far instance, was sai,d to be 225
vehicles in the 199I PM peak hour. Increasing
Y~ this vvlume by 12.5% to aceount for compounding 3%
grawth Duer faux years, results zn approximately ~
~ 255 vehiGles turning left, :Eor an assumed inczease
; of 30 Vehic3.es. Withaut the Evergreen Road
interchange far Phase I develapment of the
Suliivari Park Center, thi,s left turn moaement wilJ.
be si,gni.ficantly higher. The Sullivan Park Center
~ EIS in 1985 prcajected an additiara af approxi.mately
' 255 trips to this left tuzn mvvement, a differrence
af 230 trips over the background grarath rate
assumgtian, a signi.ficant difference. However,
the completivn vf the Evergreen Road interchange
will di.vert the majQrity of the projected 265
trips. ],eaving addztional capacity for the ~
PrapQSal and ather development.
"i 4. Page 27 of th+e DEIS states that "Spokane Caunty~
; has existi,ng plans to wzden 5u1livan to 5 lanes ~
" sauth of BzQadway." We are unaware flf any
exi5tzng plans which aa:e gending at this time.
! 'i"he FEIS shvuld identzfy Specafically the plans
referred to and their present 5tatus. J
' The County's 1990 comprehensive plan reflects its desire to--
~
substantially increase the density of develespment an Sullivan
Rflad by praviding far a major north/south cvrnmmezciaz zone on I
Sullivarx Road south of I-49. This County commitment, cambined
~ with the prvjected traffic impacts of the prvprasal and the
Sullivan Paxk Center, reguires bpth imprvvements ta the Sullzvan C~
. Road inte~'change and the cQnstructzon af the Evergreer~ Rc~ad ~
- intcrcnange in the irnmediate vicina,ty. The 4E15 does not
' reflect the County's analysis of how these twv freeway
interchanges shrruld be funded, or pcoVide a factual basis for
allacating cvsts between Sullivan Park Genter, the Propasal, and
the su}astangial use of these two interchanges }ay vehicles which
are nvt coming ar gaing to either of these centers. It shauld
a
- 17
I
5pakane Coexnty Plaanning Departrnent
August 28, 1991
.
Page 4 ' .
~ als❑ dzscrass the prajectea use of the Evergreen Raad inrerchange ~
by traffic generated by the Proposal and development in the -
vieinzty.
A£tez addaressing the extent tv which the Prapasal and T
adjacent land develapment are la.ke3y to generate future use of
the Sullivan and Evergreen Road interchanges, the County shauld -
address, ezther in the FEIS ❑r ❑therwise, the critical issue of 1p''
€unding the cvnstruction vf the EVergreen Road knterchange and °
the necessary 5ullivan Road interchange improvements. in doing
so, it is important t❑ keiep in mind that the future improvemezats
at these twn interchanges will he qenerated only in part by the
` traffic imgacts ❑f the Proposal and the Sullivan park Centsr;
the larger dernan.d for Lhese raa+d improvements will be as a
resu].t af the County's dlecision to create a major cnmmercial
zone along Sulliuan Rvad in future decades.
As we a11 know, the Caunty's authority to innpvse exactions .
on developers may be i.mprased only to the extent attributable to -
the i,dentified[ adverse impacts af a deve}.vpmetat proposal. This
mandate i.s ref lected in the Washington' s Grawth Management Act,
Chapter 36.70A RCW, which requires that any impact fee be .
limited ta impacts xeascanably related to the new develapment. -
Thus, in carrying out its analysis of the traffic impact vf
the Proposal vn the nearby exa.sting and propased freeway ramps. .
the Coun,ty shvuld careful.ly anaiyze th¢ precise impacts, -identify the apgropxiate mitigatian requi.red, and recognize that '
Metrapali.tan Martgage, R. A. Hanson Comparsy, Inc. and Price
Develapment Campany can be held responsa.ble nn],y for subsxdizing
a la.rnited portian of the impravements requfred ta improve one ;
freeway interGhange and cvnstruet anather; they cannat be held
acCOUntable fvr what i.s essentially the public cammi,tment tv
fun+r3 those improvements, as reflected in the County's
camprehensxve plan £Qr this area. Given the extent ta which the
new interchange casts in particular are bezng driven by state
and federal design criteria, zt wou].d be highly inapprvpriate to
saddle either Sullivan Park Center or the Fraposal with the
rnajar share of these casts.
We appreci,ate the oppoztunity to participate in thi.s cammenting proCess and trust that the FEIS will include the
necessary addita.onal tra:Efic analysi.s relating tr the new 1-90
interchange and will i.dentify the additional mitigation measures ,
requi red . '
Sxncerely yvurs, ,
FOSTE ~'EPPE~~ ELNiAN
~ .
.
J. Tayloe Washburn
JTW : C r
~ ~r
wVnnse to Price IJevelanment/Foster PeWpr & She£elman Iaetter
~ i
1&2. The following respanses are genexal to the Faster Pepper Shefelman letter
and are agglicahle to a number of references thraughout the Ietter. As
indicated in the analysis provided in the DEIS and as fiarther clarified in
r_~• the respanses frana W&H Pacific and CH2M-Hill as appended to this FEIS
dvcument, the use of the propased Evergreen Interchange hy traffic coming
either to or from the Spokane Valley Flaza project wiTI be negligihle ta zerv.
jj Based on these studaes, the mitigatian under SEPA that the Valley Plaza is
required to perform as vff-site improvements is adequate. It is impossible to
quantify the public benefit that will accaue if the Evergreen Interchange is
construct.ed and particularly since it is not prnjected ta cross the Spakane
Raver, With #,he abave referenced studies and the lack of any quantifiab1e
public benefit, neather the Spakane Valley Plaza nar the public entities carr
be required ta participate in funding far the Evergreen Interchgnge.
Additianally, it is important to revisit abrief histciry of the Evergreen
Interchange itselF It is an interchange that is recognized by Washington
- State DOT to be "developer dependant° and nat on t,heir pr-iority ranking for
t,his segment (I-90: Faur Lakes t,v Idaho State Line). It was initiated at the
, j request of the developers of the prapased 5uRivarr Park Center, also laiown
- in part at the present time as the Spokane Valley PVia].l, The Evergreen
_ Int,erchange is identified as tl~e majar mitigativn factar far tra#'fic concerns
vF the propased Su1liVan Fark Center far Phases Id and III of that project,
per the I)raft and Final SupplementaT Environmenta], Impact Staternent of
19$5. The zane changes vvhich aZtow the development of the Sullivan Park
Center are conditivned on the implementation of the interchange, in
canjunctian with vther traff'~c and environmental measures. Without thc
. Sullivan Park f;enter dewelogment (including the 5pokane Vaney Mall),
bvth Spakane Gvurit;y and the WSAQT fee1 it highly cinlikely that an
_ interchange at this lveation would be needed ar required in the foreseeable
future of 20 ta 30 years.
J In an attempt to support develnpment and the economy of the 5pakane area,
the cniznnty responds to the issue o£ a"fmrrnula for participatian in the
sharing of casts for raa+dvvay improvemertts in the vacini$y" and the caunty
, is mvving farward in an,alyzing and hapefully implementing a
~ Transportativn Improvement Baard ftmded prpject in conjunetion with the
~ Su1livan Paxk Center develagment which wauld gotentially assist in the
connection of Evergrreen Road ta the praposed interchange as well as heip
provide assistance in the impravements to Evergreen Road ta the svuth of
- the interchange. WSIIf]T alsa recognizes that cerrtain design requirements
which they may xequest quite passibly wiU exceed those needed far the
- Phase IIIIII praposed interchange. It is probabTe that they will, through
_ whatever source of fundinng may be avai]able at the time of amplementatian,
assist an the funding of the interchange tv meet tihase additianal design
requirements.
,
19
~
4
~
3. Flease see Append.=ces A, B and C to this FEIS which present more detailed -
informatian and aiialysis From W&H Pacific and CH2M-Hill, traffic
consult,anta t4 the EIS process concerning the Spokane VaT1ey Plaza project.
Caneerning the E aergreen Tnterchange, glease refer to camment response
1, abave.
4. For a poirat of clarification, both the traffic infnrmation in the DEIS and the
additional inf'ornatinn in this FEIS document prvvide signaficant tra..ffic _
detail an the Sullivan R.oad Interchange at I=90, the no-impact vn the
proposed Evergreen Interchange, and significant detail vn the affected or _
potentially a'f"ected county arterial intersections and streets, where
applicable. These traftic studies identify impact$ an the existing county
roads serving tha site and on the 1-90 and Sullivan Raad Tnterchange,
None of these studies identified any impacts as far west as the proposed I-90
and Evergreen Interchange.
5. Flease see response camment 1 from the W&H Pacific letter, appended to
this document, and camrnents fram the CH21VI-Hill review analysis, a1sD
appended to this dxument.
6. Please note in the appended W&H Paeific respanse comments, traffic
vvlalmes for this intersection have been corrected, with a resultant change
in service level (1995-With I]evelopment) at ths souf.h aff and an ramps. For
details, please refer to the appended W&H Pacific and GH2;M-Hill
documents. 7. F'lease refer to comment 3 in the Appendix A W&H Pacific 1etter to this ,
FEIS. 'I`he information provided should clarify tfiis concern. ,
8. Please see response comment 4 in the W&H Pacifie letter in Appendix A af
this document. As nated 'therein, the imprnvement of Sullivan Raad °between 1-90 and Sprague Avenue has been included in Sgokane County"s
Six Year R.aad Cvnstruction Program for a numberr of years. to date, this
prapvsed facility project has nnt rated high enough in priority to receive
autside funding assistance from the state urban arterial funding agency. ~
3. The cambined traTic from Fhase 1of the Sullivan Fark Cent.er (Spakane ~
Valley Mall and motel) aTong with the 5pakane Valley Plaza traffic and ~
background traffic have heen incZuded in al1 nf the EIS analysis. The
analysis detaiTs the impacts to tfie 5ullivan Raad Interchange and .
surrounding intersectians and streets. Ta reiterate, it identifies no impact
to or frvm the proposed Evergreen Iaterchange relative to the prapased ~
Valley Plaza pgojeet which requires nv aff-site mitigatian. Niajor traffic impscts identified with t.h:e Spokane Val1ey Plaza prvject (delineated on
pages 3$ and 39 af the DEZS) wi11 be mitigated as identified and cnnsequently
imglemented thrvugh sgreement and funding by and between the project
prapanent and Spmkane County, accortling to the mitigation Frocedures under SEPA, the anly currently availalale methad For the county to
„ailocate" costs fnr irmpact mitigativn.
9 .
20
~i
. To date, there has been na traffic analysis vr other study that suggests the
development along 5u1Tivan Road South of 1-3(] wauld require
inc►provements to both the Sullivan Road Interchange and the construction
_ of the EVergreen Raad-I-90 Interchange. It appears unlikely that the type of
development either existing or prnpnsed alang Sullivan Road wvuld have
any measurab1e or sign.ificant impact a1ong Evergreen Road, located 1 mile
to the vvest.
i~ 16. Please see the respvnse to Comment 1. There is no traffic engineering
analysis or basis t,o came to this conclusion.
,
11. This is not applicable as Spokane caunty is not part of the Washingtan
Growth 1Vianagement ACt and has neither presented to its' citizenry for
~ consideratian far the impQSition v£ impact fees nar eampleted the necessary
tJ . capital planmng required under the set to a11ow this measure to proceed
~ forward.
12. Please see the respanse tv caxnments 1 and 2. A4fl required amproaernents to
~ date have been based an the appropriate required rnitigatian for the
, particulsr propvsed develapment.
13. Thank yau for the respnnse.
~
{
,
_J
~
I
~ .
21
i
,
I Distribution List -
Fedexal
FHWA, I7istrict 10, F'ortland, Olympia -
*Environrrr.ental Pratection Agencyf Seattle
*Postal 5erviee, Spokane I
*Sail Canservatian Service, 5pakane Sist+e -
*Department of Cnmmerce and Ecanomic Develagment _
*L?epartment af Cvmmunity Develvpment
Department vfEcology (2 copies)
*I]epartment of Wildlife
*I]epartment of Natural Resources (2 copies)
*Department af S'ocial and Health Services (2 copies)
Departrnent af Transpartation (2 copies)
*Boundary Review Boaxd f4r Spokane Cnunty
*Energ~ Office
*C]ffice oF Archaeology and Histpric PreserWation
*C)ffice af Financia] Management
Qffice vf the GaVernor - -
*LTtilities gnd Transpar}stion Commission ,
Regianai !
Spakane County Regional Planning Conference (2 copies)
*Spcakane Transit Autharity
*Air Pollutian control Authority
CitylCounty Historic F'reserv$tion Qffice
Spokme C4unty -
Boa_rd af Caunty Cvmmissioners (3 copies)
.
*Central Va11ey Schvoi I3istrict #356 .
Chief Civil I)eputy (2 copies)
,
*Prosecutar's C)ffice *Ganservation District
County '20$' atudy -
Engineering IJepartment (3 copies) ~
*Fire District #1
*Health Distriet {2 copies)
Hearing Ex$miner cam.mittee (4 copies)
*Parks and Recreation Ilepartment :
Planning Department (20 copies)
V
*sheri€f s office -
Utility I)epartment ,
City af Spokme -
Gity Manager ;
*C3ffice of the Nfayor ~
*Planning T)epartment '
-
~ Z2
N
- *Planning Manager
*Public Warks Department
r *Zoning Office
Neighbaring Gomznunitic-s
~ *City of Caeur d'Alene, Office af the Mayor
*Caty of Pvst Fa:lls, C3ffice af the Mayor
*Kootenai County, Baard of Caunty Cvmmissianers
' *Town af Millwoad
Y
r Utll1tles
, *Bonneville Pawer Administratinn
. *Vera Water and Pawer
*Tnland Power and Light
*U. S. We st
~ *Va11ey Garbage 5ervice
*Wash.ington Water Fvwer
Llbraries
Spakane County Puhlic Library (2 copies)
Spokane Public Library
Medi~
*KHQ ~
~ *ETBX TV
*ICREM TV
*RYILY 'I"LT
*Spakane Business Journal
< . *Sp❑kane Daily Chranicle
_ *The 5pvkesman Review
*T~~ Val1ey Herald
, Uthers
*Council far Land Care and Plsxuinng
Metropvlitan Martgage and Securities Co., Inc.
j *Spokane Area I]eveinpment cauncil
~ *Spokane Audubnn Society
*Spokane Area Chsrnber of Gommerce
*'L7alley Chamber of Cn-mmerce
Pri~e Developmemt Co.
- Poster Pepper & Shefelmsn
- - R. A. Hansan Go.
,
*Flease Note: A11 above vrganizatians lisfed with an asterisk have received a
letter frorn Spvkane County indicating that the Final EIS for the
Spvk$ne Valley F'Iaza is availgble. All others receiaed fiall capies
of the FEIS.
.
' 23
~
rf
- ~ A►ppeI1dixA
-7
t
i t
W&H PACIFIC ResponRes to
~
- ~ Waaiirlgton State Department af Transportatcvn
and
~
~
Foster Pep~ ~ ~~elman
r
i~
~
~
~
~
~
t~
r
: I PACIFIC
3025-112th Avenue N.E.
P.O. Box C-97304
Bellevue, WA 98009-9304
File 3-0283-0301
September 5, 1991
- Eastern Washington University
. Institute for Urban and Local Studies
West 421 Riverside, Suite 421
°J Spokane, Washington 99201
Attn: Dr. Anthony Anderson, Director
Dear Dr. Anderson,
~ RE: RESPONSE TO PRICE DEVELOPMENTS COMMENTS - EIS FOR SPOKANE VALLEY PLAZA
:This is a response to the points raised by J. Tayloe Washburn of Foster, Pepper & Shefelman
on behalf of Price Developments and the Hanson Company, in their letter of August 28, 1991.
' The scope of the traffic analysis was agreed to by ourselves and Spokane County to include
intersections within 1 mile of the development, including the access roads to the site, or 6
intersections. Further analysis included the Sullivan Road/I-90 freeway interchange. It was
specifically stated a direct analysis of the proposed Evergreen interchange would not need to
be undertaken. This is, in fact, the worst case scenario since all currently loaded traffic on
the Sullivan Road interchange remains using the interchange in our analysis.
' A discussion of the points raised in the letter follow. Page numbers refer to the draft EIS
issued on July 29, 1991.
Point 1
The existing signal timing for the Interstate 90 ramps was provided by the WSDOT. The east
and westbound ramps have been built with three lanes each direction and Sullivan Road has
two through lanes and a double left turn lane in both the northbound and southbound
directions.
The existing and proposed signal timing was reviewed using the planning method of the NCAP
capacity software, version 2, 1988 by Professional Solutions, Inc. This method of analysis
was used for all intersection capacity analysis including all the three I-90 ramp cases, those
being: 1. The existing situation, 2. The 1995 case with action and 3. The 1995 case with
action and mitigation. When final design is undertaken, an operational method for signal
timing should be used to determine the exact signal timing parameters.
The analysis showed that the existing signal timing did not allow for sufficient time for the
additional volumes in the northbound and southbound directions on Sullivan Road, due to the
, increased trips to and from the Spokane Valley Plaza site. In fact, it was these specific legs
of the intersection that gave a lower level of service.
25
' (206) 827-0220 Fax (206) 822-5341 Planning • Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Design 9 Environmental Services ~
f'
A change in signal timing allowed the actuated system to "max aut" ar giVe the maximum -
a9iQwabCe xime to the specific mavements noted above. Thus, the demand was better
satisfied arid a higher level ofi service was vbtained nn that speci#ic intersectian 9eg, which
resulted in an improved level af service for the ent+re irrtersectian. By increasing the cycle length and adding 7 0- 26 secands additional time to the svufihbaund
and eastbound rnovernent for the Sutlivan RaadlNortherrr ramp, the LaS hecame "B".
°
Thus, these signal timirag adjustmen4s ►ry! ere ahie to significantly imprave the leveI vf service,
withvut infrastructure smpravements. Gvpies of the intersection capacity wvrksheets are -
attached.
Point 2
The tra#fic rraovernents ge nerated by bvth the 5pakane Ualley Plaza and tFre Price Development
projects are shawn on page 27 in Figure B. Additional6y, on page 25, paragraph 5stated that _
while most of the new trips from both the Spaisane Valley PEaTa and the Price Davelapment
will have a camplementary effect (that is, the traffic movements ar$ not cvmman) there would
be a cumulati^ve eff$ct vn the Sullivan Road free►Nay bridge over Intsrstate 90.
Point 3
The hackground grovuth rate of 3 peTCent per yeac was ab#ained by analyzing WSdOT and Spakane Caunty traffic data. Yhis percentage rate was discussed and approved by Spokane Y
Couraty Engineers in our preiiminary mee#ing with thern. The backgrourtd rate of 3 percent 3✓
per year wa5 used in the analysisr 85 ffllI(3WS:
(Base year trips x 3 pereentlyear] + Projeci trips ~
~
In vrtier to address the eomparisan of the 3 percent background growth rate with actual traffrc ~
grawth generated by the Price Develvpment, Chapter 9 of xhe E15 was included.
Figure A in the draft EIS shawed the', trips generated tay the Spokane llalley Plaaa and
compareti therra to the Base yearlPhase IIPhase II1Phase Ikl of the Price Develvpments in ordsr -
to adequafieiy address the issue o# the cumulsti►►e traffic gcovvth. In aIC turning movement
cases, except two, the method using the (3 percent) backgrflund growth plus project traffic '
produced traffic vv1uPS`ies GREATER 7HAN the Phase 1 af the Price ❑eve6opment trips. In
other words, the 3 percent per year background growth methvd mvre than adsquately
addresses the cumulatiVe impact ❑f otMer traffic growth (including Price) in the area. fihe ~
other phases nf the Price development wi91 have use vf the Evergreen interchange, with -reduced volumes at Sulfivan Road interchange. F-,
However, in order to address this pvint specifieally, the analysis fer the 1-90 ramps was _
perfarmed again, specifically including the Phase 1 f'rice Develapment trips with the 5pokans
Valley Plaza trips. ThesQ additiaraal trips vrrere included at the sauthern ramps in the feft turn '
eastbound Dff ramp to narthbaund Su[li►'ran, sauthbaund 5ulliuan to eastbaund 1-90 on ramp.
the southbaund 5ullivara mavemen# at the northern ramp and th8 nvrthbound 5ulliVan
moVement at the northern ramp. ,
~
' 26
~ ~ ,
i
~
; It was faund that the inc+rease in these trips did not affect the level of sarvice fvr the tvvo
~ intQrsections. Again, the effect af reVising signaE tfming to meet demand adequately
~ addressed the increased traffic vvlumes due to Price.
i;
J-- PoinL4
,
; Page 18 of the EIS d15CU5Sed the plans to widen Sullivan Road to five lanes svuth of
f-- ~ Brvadway, 7he 1991-1 996 5ix Year Transportatonrr Irnprovement Pragram discusses
- ~ improvement plans fvr SuIliuan Rgads betw►een I-90 and Sprague Avenue. These are budget
' arrivunts and no specific "engineered plans" were re►►iewed by W&H Pacific.
Everareen lnterchanqLq
,
Yrdp assignrnenfis to and from the site was based on the rr9ost direct route ta and from arigins
and destinations northe SoCItI1, east and west af the project site. Trips fr+arn 4he freeway will
use the Sullivan Fiaad interchange for access tv the site. Trips from the narth will use 5ulli►ran
Raad to access the site. It is anticipated that na traffic will use the Evergreen Interchange for
access tv ths sixe. The Evergreen intercnange will be one mile west of the 5ullivan Rvad
-interchange and will not be cor►venient far access to the site.
:
~ The analysis used 1995 as the project analysis year far Spokane VaIley Plaza. The Euergreen
mterchange will not be vperational by that time, therefare, it is nnt reasonahle ta includs it in
the analysis. This is, in fact, thB WOfSe CaSe 5C8narli1 51nCe 8II tflp5 presently using the
- Suilivan Road interchange wi91 stay assigned to 5u11i►ran Road irr the 1995 analysis,
I
- ' Truly,
{ &H P CIIFIC
~
r , sep GlawMt~, P,
' Sania~r Transportatia Engineer
_ cc: Metro,politan Mvrtgage. poug Adarxis
3
. J OpfICe.Wp
~
- -
, 27
.
PACIFIC
3025-112thAvenue N E
P.D. Bvx C-97304
Bellewc, WA 9$069-4304
File 3-0283-0307
I 5eptember 5, 1991
Eastern Washington UniVersoty
Institute far Urban and Locai Studies
,
WeSt 421 RiverSida, 5uite 421
_ Spakane. Washingtan 99201
` - pttn: Dr. Tar►y pndersan, [3irectar
' pear ❑r. Andersvn,
~i
RE: 'AESPDNSE TO WSDOT COMMENTS -EpS FOR SPOKANE VALLEI' PLAZA
-
;
This is a response tv the pvints raised by Mark Rahwer af the Washingtvn State mepartrrient
of Transportation.
►4s praposed, vae recvmmended sigrral re-timing af the Sullivan RvadlZntersxate 90 ramps to
allaw for the increased traffic volumes through the interchange. WS[]OT concurs with this.
We have attached the capacity analysis wnrksheets for the interchange. Ncrte that there is
` a change in #he IeVeI of ser►rice reparted far the southerrr I-90 ram,p and Sullivan Road for the
- 1995 case with daveioprro-ent frvm L05 "F" to L45 "E°. This is reparted in Tab1e 3 an page
35 and in Figure 7 on page 37 of the draft EIS. The WSaOT alsa recornmended the foilawing
- rraitigation rneasures. C?ur cvmments fallow.
~ Point 1.
, A. An additFonal right turn lane eutending from Mission strset fram the eastbvund vff
ramp be canstructed.
The insta9Cat+vn of a right turn onEy fane from southbound Sullivan tv westbound
Massian will not be of direct benefit tv this project as there are no new tr'sps assigned
from sauihbvund Sullivan to westhaund Missian. Indirect benefit wauld be the freeing
_ o# some capacity to the sauthbaund through moVernent at xhe Sulii►ranJMission
~ intersection, There wiEl be na accsss allovved intv the site off af southbound Sullivan
.v,
Road, except at the Brvadway intersection. The distance ficom the southsrn vff ramp
to Missian Avenue is approximately 1,600 feet. Thus, the "weave" moVement witl be
~ accomplished in that distance.
i
i
B. Widening ❑f Sullivan Road in the interchange area ta 7 lanes.
, It is our understanding that this paint refers to Sullivan Raad svuth af the southern 1-90
ramps (eastbaund offlan ramps) to Broadway AVenue.
- 29
(206) 827-0220 Fax (206) 822-5341 Planning ►Engineering o Suraeying 9 Landscape Design •Envirtrnmental 5ervices ~
i
r ~
The current ADT (average d'aily traffic) on 5ullivan Road is 23.912. Based vn the
SulliWan Park Center EES (Price develcapment), dated September 1985, the 1995 ADT
is projected to be 26,200 withaut the Priee develapment and 38.467 with the Price
Deveavprnent. Typical ApT ranges are 2 5,000 - 40.000 ADT far 5 lans cross section
roadways and 30,000 to 45,000 ADT fvr 7 6ane cross section roadways.
Therefore, from acapacity szandpoint, the 7 lane car+figuration for'Sullivan Road is felt
to be unnecessary fram the southbound I-90 ramps to Broadway based on the traffic
vafumes generated by this proposal. Th6s ap plies to the 19 95 with development case.
c . Installatlnn of slip ramps.
ft is our understanding that the issue of sli,p ramps pertains to the consttuction of a slip
ramp from the eastbaund off ramp firorn I-90 with cannection to Missivn Avenue. The
construction of a slip ramp to Missivn Avenue wvuld be of limited value in that Misssvn
Street dcres not have sceess to the praject. Thus, there wauld be na eliminativrr vf
patent+al "weaving" fram vehicles making a right turn from the eastbound aff ramp to
southbaund 5u[livan and then a left xurn to Broadway. In fact, any pntential weave
wvuld be made worse by shnrtening the distance (Off ramp to Broadway versus
Missivn to Broadway). Therefo►e, it is my canclusivn tha4 the installation of a slip
ramp woufd be of no value to the praject.
F'aint 2
We hava eva6uated in more detail the intersectian at 5ullivarr and Missian. This
analysis specifically Iooks at a crDss sectivn vf 7 lanes on Sullivan Raad (Three lanes ~
sauthbound, three lanes nvrthbound and a dedicated ieft turn lane) rather than 5 lanes.
7he anafysis has shown that with 7 lanes the level of seruice for the intersection is
Ln5 "B" 4ar the 1995 with activn and rraitigation whiCe the LOS #nr 5 lanes is LO S "B"'. -
Thus, the level af service, at the irrtersection, daes nat impraVe with a 7 lans crass ~
section on SulEivan Road.
~
' i
Poirat 3 I have no comment on this point. 5
Truly,
&H PACI lC '
sep Glawi#x, P.
Senior Tcansportati Engineer ,
cc: Nletrvpvlitan NVortgage, Doug Adams
pttachments I ~
4dot.wp _i
30 ~
i
PACIFIC
302S.11 3ih Avenuc N.E.
: P.O. 8ux C-97304
•
Be i [ewue. wa 98009-y104
~ File 3-02$3-0341
SePternber E, 1991
,
Eastern YYashington Univarsity
Institute for LErban and Locai Studies
WesZ 421 Riverside, Suite 421
Spakane, Washingtan 99201
' Attn: Dr. Tony Anderson, Directar
; .
❑ear D►. AnderSVn,
RE: 13ESPQNSE TQ !IV'SC]OT C4MMEtJTS_- a!S FQR SPC]KAIVF
,-1 In reference to Point 2 rsised by Mark Rahwer ot the WSDOT, we have C81culated the
z W~. fallowing segment artertal capacity informatiorr for tfis Sutlivan Raad corridor fram tha 1-90
ramps tv 5prague Avenue.
Bvth the narthhvund and southbaund leveis of sarviCe were CBEculated for three cases, those
being: 11 1995 with action t5 IaneSf, 2) 1995 with action and mitigstian (5 lan9S) Snd 31
1995 with activn and mixigatian (7 aanes). Mitigat;on rneasures incEude ravised signal timing
at the apprQpriete intarsactions, as discussed in thB ElS,
, The vverali leva1 of service gor the 199 5 with action case waS LO S "C" for bdth directions,
, Mitiga[ion measures impravad the isvel pf sgrvice faam "C" to "S" in the 3vuthbCUnd CaSe
while the northhound case ramsined at LQ5 "C".
With a 7 Iane cross section on Suleivan (frvm tho sauth 1-90 ramps to Braadvvay) the averall
' leve1 nf servir:a rArrsAdnFiri Ar i nS "R- southbgvnd aiid LOS "C" rinrthbvund, Thl; ovarall iaval
of service is the average speed vver the entire arterial frnm tna sotath I-90 ramps ta 5pragua
AVenue. Theref4re, lncrPasina frnm ab fan9 to a 7 lane ccanfigtiratiQn viaill nat sigrtifigantly
chatzge tftts IoNo9 of sorvicC Qt this ao ltsriul. Siryce LhC inter5eCIi0f4s 8re rel8riv9ly Glpsa
tvgether, it is ttzs fntersection leVal vt service which limits iha vveral6 arterial Isvsl af servica,
- lt yau have any questicsns, please contaCt me.
Truly,
W&H PACIFiC
Joseph Glowitr. P.E.
SBnior 7ranspor[ation Engine9f
5~ J
11dor3.wp 31
r`1
J
{206} $27-0220 FSDi (206) $22•534I Planning • E:nsinECriqg • Survtyin~ ~ L.tiYdtiCa€?E' Dt"i1gll • EnVirU:ltticilEa1 5ceviceN
~
.A`ppen~li~ B'
r
~
Iteview af DEIS Ij,%~rtation Da#.a
and
~
J FEIS pxsponses
~
,
~
_J
' l
.
i ,
,
. _VIr
i i
~ r
~ i
I ~
j
r
Engineers
- . ~ Plcrnraers
Economisfs
Screntists
,
- - September 5, 1991
SEA32I17,AA
` "Dr. Anthnny H. Anderson
Birector, Institute for Urban and I.acal 5tudies
' Eastem Washington UniVersity
~ West 421 Riuerside, Suite 421
-Spokane, Washington 39201
Dear Dr. Anderson:
r
y Sub]ect: Traffic Impacts of 5pokane Vailey F1aza
~
We have been aequested to rewiew the DEIS traffic study and to review seVeral cam-
ments offered by Price DeVelopment Co. and R.A. Hansan Co., Tnc. cmncerning the
alaave referenced prQject. These camments, summarized in a 1etter dated August 28,
1991, by J. T. Washburn of Fraster, Pepper & Shefelman, concern the status and fund-
ing af the propased Evergreen interchange and impravements to the Su1livan Raad
interchange nn I-90. The Evergreen interchange was attached as a condition nf de-
velopment for future phases af the Sullivan Park Center, located narth of I-90.
The thrust of the August 28 comment letter is that cumulative development in the
' Spnkane Vailey vvili create a need far an additivnal I-90 interchange, improaernents
to an eac7isting interchange, and that traffic assQCiated tivith the Spokane Va11ey Plaza
will cantribute to thase needs. $ased on a review of the approach and depart-ure
rcautes to and fratn the project site, we concux that the praject ufiill contrihute to the
- need for improvements at the Sullivan interchange. The conclusian that prvject
~ traftic contributes to the need for the Evergreen interchange, heawever, is unsup_
- ported. Frvject trips to and fram the west on I-30 wauld be exaected to use the Sul-
lidan Road interchange because it offers the quicYcest, most canvenient access fvr
Spokane Valley Plaza patrQns. There wvuid be no benefit far these trips to use a fu- ,
- ture Evergreen Roacl interchange one mile to the west, since it would involve a more
circuitous raute along Missian A►renue, thus prvducing longer travel times far patrans.
~ EVen far trips ariginating narth of I-90 near Pines Road, the 1-90 freeway route to
~ 5uilivan Road offers better travel times than any route using a future Ewergreen Raad
interchange.
J
_ CH2M NlLL Seattla C7fflce 777 908th Avenua. N.E,. Bellewue. Washington 206.453 5000
' P.Q. Bt]x 99500, 9ellevue, Washington 98004-205I7
- 33
FI
~
~ -
I L
Dr. Anthony H. Anderscan .
Page 2 I -
5eptemher S, 1931 , SEA:32117.AA _
As nated in the Washingt❑n SEPA rules, mitigation measures must be "related to
specific, adverse envirranrnentar impacts" associated with the propasaL The Spokane
Valley P'laza DETS demonstrates that mitigatian can be adequately accamplished with
imprvvements in the Sullivan Road corridor, including signal timing revisions at the
1-90 interchange. L3nder these circurnstances, cvnsideration of an interehange at
Evergreen Road as additional mitigation wrauld lae redundant.
It shcauld be further emphasized that the E►rergreen Road interchange would pravide
direct and primary access to the SuiIiVan Park Center. By virtue of its possible can-
T1eCt1C1ri 5d11ih tD M1S51OI1 AVe]71de, traffic to and from the residential and comrnercial ~
district along Evergreen Road also will use this corridor. Tn the 1Qng term, the :
EVergt't,en interchange may divert traffic from both the Pines Road and Sullivan Road
interchanges. Hawever, in the 1995 planning horizon addressed in the DETS, these
diversion eftects wauld be minirnal, since traFf°ic operations will remain satisfactory Qn
the existing system.
The August 28 camments also propase the development o£ a formula for sharing af j
casts of the future EVergreen interchange, based vn the specific identified imRacts af
individual projects. Such a formula far impact fees wouId require Spakane County to a-'
adapt the pravisions of the Growth Nlanagement Act. 'I`his fiinding mechanism would require a traffic study ta determine the benefits that might accrue to various parties,
which study has not yet been autharized ar initiated. Tf the use af the proposed Ever-
green interchange by Spokane V~lley Plaza trafFic is minimal, as describer3 above, the
funding participatian by the project would he negligible.
VVe have also rediewed the traffic valume prajectians, signal timing, and capacity -
analyses along Sullivan Road at the rwa I-90 ramp terminals and at the Missian Inter-
section. Based an this review, we haVe suggested seaeral revisions to be incorpQrated
rn the FEIS traffic analysis. 'I'hese revisions explicitly account for the farecasted
volumes assaciated with the Sullivan Park Center.
With these revisians, and with cha~ nges in signal timing at the I-90 ramps, traffic ~
operations at the narth ramp terrhinals wi11 imprave the LO5 B, and ta L.OS C at the
sauth rarinp terminals. These imprQuements rnaterialize because the existing signal
timing would be unresponsive to tYte changes in traffic pattems that taccur with the
Spakane Valley Plaza and Sullivan Park Genter. With the revised signnal #iming as a -
mitigation measure, the signals will respond to the nevv traffic patterns. In this way,
LDS C can be maintained in the corridor withvut arequiring geometric improvements '
at the intersections, and without widening of Sullivan Raad. ;
34 l
'
~
Dx. Antnony H. Ander5on
Page 3
september s, 7991
'-1 SEA32117.A,A
SY Similar signa➢ timing revisions at the. Sultiaan/Mission intersectian will restare traffic
operations ta LO5 Bat this locatian. Under these candixions, an additionai south-
bound approach lane wauld not be required for mitigatian.
' Please cflntact us if you require additiona1 inf4rmatian concerning ❑ur review.
Sincereiy,
r
' ~-CHZM HTLL
~c~•..,~.-
. I]vn Tranum, P.E.
5enior Transpartatian Manager
4 ~
C3l5ea8110~052.51
r` !
.
i
I
~
,
~ 3J
~ '
i ~
I
~
Appendix C
W&FI FAICIFIC Data Sheets vn
1-90 Northh &Southlhouv►d SuZlivao Road Iaterchange
The following infarmativn includes aIl af the wvrk sheets for the
' i intersection tra£fic anadysis fvr the I-90 Interchange with Sullivan Road,
hoth 11Torth and Sauthbound on ana aff ramps. In each instance data is
presented for 1995 Base i raffic, with backgraund increases, but without
development af the project. Second, data is presented with the SpDkane
Valley Pdaza in place as weld as the Pbase I af the 5ullivan Park Center,
_ withaut any traffie mitigation. 'I'hird, data is presented fvr the secand case,
' but this tinae witFr the proposed Draft EIS traffic mitigation measures in
place.
- The pages are Tisted for each trn-off raznp segment area. The sauth ranp
includes pages S-1 thrvugh S-1$. The north r8mp includes pages N-1
through N-17.
i;
L
' i
i
37
i i
SOT.TTHRA11+P
{
69m6on PM
1995 Base Traffic Withaut Develapment S1-S6
1995 with F'rapnsed SpQkane Valley P1azaIPrice S7-SI2
Ilevelagment Traff'ic
1995 with Proposed Spokane Valley P1aaaIF'3°ice S13-SI$
Devel opmentlMi ti gativ n
,
~
-1
,
~ I~ c7~ ~
INPU'I' WORKSHEET
Intersection:Sullivan & South (EB) Ramp Date:Sept 5,1991
Analyst: LAJ TimePeriod Anlyzd: PM FEAK Area Type: CBD Xather
Project No.1995 SASE CYtyJ'State.5gokane, WA
, 1VOY,tTME AN'L3 GEQMETRICS SULLIVAN NI5 ST,
[1480] fl "
" 5B TDTA,L 2 2 ~
12.0 I 0 [ 0]
[ v ] ~ 12.0 -W$ 'I'OTP,L
(N) 0 1395 65 TH LT ❑ v
III I > --------w--------
. NDRTH v
1 2-12.01-LT---"
- IDENTIFY IN DZAGRAM 1-12.01-RT--- v ^
I.uolume5 ~ >
2. Lanes, lane widths TH RT RAMPS
,3.Movements by lane ^ 255 12.0 I E/W STREET
14.Parking locations - ~ 12.0 960
S.Ea~ storge ingths [ 710] 0 2 1 t] 165
5 . Islands E f B 'T'flTAL - (1125]
- 7. sus st❑ps v 455 rre8 ToTu
' TRAFFIC A13❑ ROADWAY Cfl1dDITTONS
`Ap Grd. % IiV Adj.Pkg,Lane Suses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Button P,rr.
lpr Y/N 1dm (Nb) (pd1hr) Y/N Mn.Time Type
-
EB +0.0 2.0 ld 4 0 0.90 20 N 27 3
IWB + C1. C3 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 27 3
NB +0. ❑ 2.0 N 0 0 0.9I7 20 N 16 3
SB +d.❑ 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 16 3
Grade:+up,-dawn Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.green for
HV:veh, > 4 whls PHF:peak-hvur Eactar pedestrian crossing
~Nm_pkg_maneuVers/hr-==CnflPecis;Cnflctngrpeds/hrArx_Type:_Types1^5====~-_-_
FHASING
D
I
A V V
G "
s R
pi
I m
. * v
ITim- G= 5.0 G= 25.0 G= 15.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G- 0.0 G= 0.0
, ing Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+Ft= 4
-IPtmd/Actl A A A
~ Protected turns: avao^ I Permitted turns. ICycle Length fid Sec
c.,-_---------__
J WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WA< ~ using NCPiP by PS3
l _sz
--------e--r-----------------rr-- I-------------------------------------------- -
xntersectian:SulliWan & 5outh (EB) Ramp Date:Sept 5,1491 ,
Analyst.LAJ TimePeriod Aniyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CSD XQther -
Project No.1995 BASE City/State:Spokane, WA
VDLUME ADJUSTMENT Wf3RKSHEET
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Apgr. . Mvt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flra rt Nurn,ber Lane Adj. Prop.
Volume Hour Rate +Graup in Ln of Utiliz Flow of
(vph) Factvr Vp Grp Vg Lanes FGtr.[J V,vph LT or RT
PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9Plt , Prt
LT 255 0.90 283 0.36 IyT
EB TH 0 0.90 0 J 789 3 1.10 868 *
RT 455 0.90 506 0.64 RT
LT Q 0.90 0 0.00 LT
WB TH 0 0.90 0 *
RT d 0.90 Q 0.00 RT
-----R
LT 0 0.90 Q 0.00 LT
NB TH 96[] 0.90 1067 Q 1250 3 1.10 1375 *
RT 165 0.90 183 0.15 RT
-
LT 85 0.90 94 0.06 LT
SB TH 1395 0.90 1550 C 1644 4 1.10 1808 * -
RT 0 Q.g[} ❑ 0.00 RT
I,AN£ GRC3T]P DIAGRAMS- [ * * * = PRC]TCTD. = QERMTTD, PROTCTD & PERMTTD ]
J'[
►'1 A 1 A
Lr
v v
------s------r.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---si----i........~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------------------..
WILSEY & HAM , Be11evue. WAr , using NCAP by P5I
I
tl 1
~ 52
I
• t
--o----------------_-s--.r--_--s-----------s----------s------------------..------
Intersection;Srallivan & 5outh (EB) Ramp Date:Sept 5,1991
- Arlalyst: LAJ TimePeriod An3yzd. PM ,PEAK P,rea Type: CHD Xather
Prvject No.1995 BP,SE City/State:5pokane, WA
' SATLTRPiTION FLCDW ADJUS'I'MEN'I' WORKSHEET
-7,ANE 3 4 5 5 7 8 3 10 11 12 13
'ROUP,rdeal No. Ln.W. HVyVeh Grade Pkg. ~ Bus81k AreaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat
Sat. of Fw Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt F1wRt
1 2 F1ow Lns s
'kp Mv Fcphgp N T.9-5 °I'.9-6 T.9-7 T.9-8 T.9-9 T.9-10 T.9-11 T.9-12 (vphg)
~-EB J 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.400 1.000 0.904 0.946 4572
fB
48 fJ 2800 3 1.000 ' 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 (].978 1.000 5229
~
3B C 1800 4 1.000 0. 99{3 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.997 7108
, I LANE GRI7VP DIAGRAMS- [ = FRaTC'i'D, = PERA+ITTD, = PROTCTD & PERMTTQ)
~-------------_-__-----_-_-_o-o--__----------------------------_---------------
C " J " fl
' V V
~ WILSEY &HAM , Bellevue, WA< , using NCAP by PSI
S3
----`------'~~~~~~~------'-----io-~.-..--`--s--------------------e-.r-------------
I . S
Intersectican:Sullivan & Sauth (E8i) Ramg ❑ate:Sept 5,1991
Analyst: LA..T TimePeri~d Anlg~zd: PM PF~ ~ea ~"yps; C~3❑ XOther
Praject No.1995 BASE City/State:Spakane. WA
SIIPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TLTRN ADJUSTMENT FACT❑R, fLT
TNPUT VAI3IABLES r CDMP[]TATI4NS EB WB NB SB -
CyCl e LeI7gth, C[ SeC ]
Effective Green, g (sec)
Number af Lanes, N ~
Total Apprgach F'1ow Rate, Va{vph}f
Mainline Flaw Rate, Vm (vph) '
Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph)
Proporti+an of LT, F1t
appvsing Lanes, Na
; Opposing Flow Rate, Va ('vAh)
Prop. of LT in app. Vvl. Plta
sop = 180vNv/(l+Plt❑( (4o0+Vm) etc.
Yo ~ Vo/Sap ~
Gu = (g-CYv)I(liYo)
Fs (875-0.525Vo)/1400 ~
P1 = Plt[l+(Nrl)91 (FsGu+4.5)]
Gq q - Gu
Pt = 1 - P1
Gf = 2Pt[1-Pt^(.5Gq)]/P1 E1 = 1800/(1400-Vo) ~ -
Fm = Gf/g + Gulg * [1I[l+PY etc. _
- -
Flt = (Fm + N - 1) /N ~ WILSEY &HAM .Be1levue, WA< , using NCAP by FSI
________________-------------i---___-____--_---------s----------------___---=T--
~
,
+ S4
1
Tntersectian:Sulkivan & South (EB) Ramg Date:Sept 5.1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriad Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther
Praject No.1995 BASE City/State:SpQkane, wA
____.__._....._..._.~,~_~.-----------------------------~s~----------------___.___.~__~a___
CAPACIT►l ANALYSIS WdRFtSF3EET
-.LANE GROCIP 3 4 5 5 7 a 9
~
Adjusted Ad.Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp vSC Crit.
- I 2 Fla►a Rate Fl►a. Rt Ratio Capac. Ratio ?
Appr. Mvznt. v s Vj s g j C c,vph X Lane
{vph} (vphg) 3 j4 4x5 3/7 Group
, - EB J 868 - 4572 0.190 - 0.250 1143 0.759
___oi ------i
WB
-c---
NB Q 1375 - 5229 ❑.263 T 0.417 2179 0.631
~
,
5B C 1808 - 7108 ❑.2'S4 - 0.567 4028 0.449 -
Cycle Length= 60.Osec, LoSt TimelCycle.L= 8.flsec, 5(v1s)ci° 0.453, Xc=0.523
LP,NE GRQUP DIAGRAMS- [ * * * = PRD'I'+CTI7 , = PERMTTD, = FRO'I`GTD & PERMT'I'I] ]
y'e A li T A a
L.
V V
_ WILSEY & HAM , $e1levue, WA< , using N'CAP by PSI
G------------------------------------------------------------------------------
55
I ~
___-_c-----------------_-___--__---------_-_
Intersection:SulZiVan & South (E~~) Ramp Qate:sept 5,1991
Analyst:LA.T TimePeriod An1yzd:PNi PEAK Area TyFe: GBD xother -
Proj ect Na. 1995 BASE City/ S I tate r Spokane, WPr
LEVEL-OF-S'ERVICE WBRKSHEE'I' ~
First Term Qelay SecQnd Term Del.ay Tat.Delay_&TLOs
LANE 3 4 5 s , 7 8 9 io 11 12 13 ~
GROUP v/c Green Cycle Delay Lane De:lay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln F,pprch Apr
---i- Ratio Ratia Length dl G1roup d2 Faetor Delay Gp aelay LOS
1 2 x g/C C sec/veh Cap,c seclVeh PF sec/veh LOS sec/veh Tbl
Ap Mv {5eC} (vph) T.9l13 (6+$)*9 9-1 9-1
EH J 0,759 0.250 60.0 15.83 1143 2.11 0.85 15.25 +C 15.25 C -
*
WB ° 0.00
N$ 0 0.631 0.417 60.0 10.53 2179 0.43 0.85 9.31 B 9.31 B
----rrr
~
4
SB C 0.449 0.567 60.0 5.74 4028 0.05 0.85 4.93 A 4.93 A -
_-__e______cr_=--=__---------------_--___-------------------_----_s------------ ,
Intersection Delay 8.63 sec/veh, Intersection L[]S B Table 9.1 ~
----------------------------------_-T---------_-_----------_--------_____-r--
LANE GROUP DTAGRAMS- [ * * * = PRC3TCTII], = PERMTTD, M = PROTCTD & PERMTTD]
C ^ J ^ f]
* ~ -
V V _
-
WILSEY & H1y,M , Hellevue, WAC , using NGAP by PSI ~
--------------------------_-_____--r_-----------------------------------_______
I
;
55 ~ .
~I
~
------------~~____--~-~--------------.~~~~~.-----~---___w-------------------------
iNPUT WORICSHEET
Intersectian.Sull.ivan & 5outh (EB) Ramp Date:Sept 5 1991
Analyst:LAJ TbmePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CHD XOther
Project Na.1995 w/prvj City/State: rao mitig, w/Price
VOLCTME AN❑ GEOMETRICS SULLIVAN N,15 ST.
, [1$75] 0 ^
" SB TOTAL 2 2 -
_ I 1 1 12.0 1 0 ~ p]
_ e v a 1 12.0 -WB TaTAL
(N} 0 1605 269 TH LT 0 V
` >
NaRTH v
- 2-12.01-LT ---R
IDENTIFY Tld DIAGRANI 1-12. Q'-RT---v ^
l.volumes --------------r-r I > -__-_-sr-----_s--
- 2. Lanes, 1ane widths TH RT RAfiPS
3.MoVements by lane " 501 12.0 1 E/"W STREET
, 4.Parking lacations - 1 12.0 1486
S.Bay storge ingths [1349] D 2 1 a<°`> 235
6.Islands ErB TDTAL - [1721]
7. Bus stvp5 V 848 N/ BTDTAI,
TRAFFIC AND ROADWAY CONDITIpNS
Ap Grd. ~ I-IV Adj.Pkg . Lane Euses PHF Cn€. Ped Pedstrn Button Arr.
pr (t) YIN Nm (Nb) cparhr3 YIN Mn.Time Type
EB +o.o 2.0 rr 4 a 0.90 20 H 23 3
, - W8 +0 . 0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 23 3
NB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 12 5
S'B +0.0 2.{} Ai D 0 0.90 20 N 12 5
Grade : tup, -down Nb :buses stopp ing/hr Min. Timing : min, green f or
'HV:veh. a 4 whls PHF:peak-hvur factos pedestrian crossing
Nm:pkg.maneuVers/hr Cnf.Feds:Cnflctng peds/hr Arr.Type: fiype 1-5
__.~--------------~~~~.__~.~_____----~_a__~a_~_------------
PHp,S I NG
I p
_ A v v
G ^
R
I A
, m * *
* V
Z" im- G= 15.0 G= 20.0 G- 20.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0
ing Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+Ft= 0 Y+R= 0][#R= 0
-__-w_ !
IPtmd/Actl P~ ~r A =~__cR~
Protected turns: oooo" I Permitted turns: ++++A I Cycle Length 60 Sec
I--------------------------__----------------i--------_-_-----------_---e___s-
WILSEY & YiAM , Bellewe, WAc ~ using NCAg by PSI
57
• I I
-s--~---ir----"---r-r-----------`I-----------'---------------------------r~~~--
~Intersection:Sullivarr & South (E~) Ramp Date:Sept 5 1991
Analyst:I~AJ TimePeri[od Anlyzd: PM PEAK Area Type: CHD 7{Other
Froject No.1995 w,lpraj City/State:no mitig,w/Price
VDLUMiE ADJUSTP+IENT WflRKSHEET
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Appr, MVt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flw rt Numkaer Lane Adj. Prop.
Vcalurme Hour Rate Group in Ln of Utiliz Flaw of
(vph) Factor Vp Grp Vg Lanes F'GtrrU V,vph LT or RT
PHF 3A4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 P1t , Prt
LFi" 501 0.90 557 0.37 L'I'
EB TH 0 4.9(} Q J 1499 3 1.10 1549 ~
RT 848 0.9{} 942 0.63 R'I` ~
LT 0 0.90 0 0.00 LT -
WB TH 0 0.90 ❑ *
R'I' U 0.90 0 0.00 RT
---s_--___
LT 0 0.90 0 0.00 LT
NB TH 1486 0.90 1651 D 1912 3 1.10 2103 *
RT 235 0.90 261 0.14 RT
LT 269 0.90 299 0.14 LT ,
SH TH 1606 0.90 1784 G 2083 4 1.10 2241
RT D 0.90 (3 I 0.00 RT
i,ANE GR[7T7P DIAGRAMS- [ * * * = P~OTGTDr = PER14T"1'D, PRD'I'C:TD $c FERMT"1"A ]
C " J " Q ~
* ~ -
v ~ ~
~
WILSEY & HAM , BeJ,levue, WAr , using NCAP by PSI
_-_-----------------------ee-----------___-___-------_--------------------------
~ I
i ;
,
I
~
~ S$
~I ~
9 .
IIntersection:Sullivan & South (EB) Ramp Qate;Sept 5 1991
Analyst:LAa TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther
Project No.1995 w~prflj City/State:no mitig,w/Price
- : ATURAJTIdN FLaW ADJUSTMENT W❑RKSHEET
LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
3ROUP Idea1 No. Ln.W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. HusBlk AreaTp Rt Trrt Lt Trn AdjSat
Sat.of F'w FhV Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt F'lt F1wRt
1 2 Flow Lns e----- --s--- S
kp Mv pcphgp N 'I'.9-5 T. 93C T. 9-7 "I'. 9-8 'I', 9-9 T, 9-10 T. 9-11 T. 9-12 (uPh4)
EB J 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.906 0.944 4572
9^B ,
--__i_
!iB +D 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.980 1.000 5237
aB C 1800 4 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 3.000 47.993 7077
' LA+1E GFi[}UP DIAGRAMS- * * = PROTCTD, = PERMTTL]. = FROTCTD & P'ERMTTD]
. c ^ J A YJ
* *
V Y
WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WA[ . using AiCAP by FSI
- 59
-intersection:Sullivan & south (EBi) Ramp-----_--l-=-Date:Sept 5 1991---_--___`_
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XDther
Praject No.1995 w,proj CitY1State.no mitig,w/Price
SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TTJFtN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, fLT
-------------------------------------------------------------~w_----~----__~_
INPUT VARIABLES/COMPUTATIONS EH WB NB 5S
Cycle Length, C (sec)
Effective Green, g (sec)
Number ❑f Lanes, N
Total Apprvach Flow Rate. Va{vph}
Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vit (vph)
Prvpartion of LT, Plt '
Oppasinq Lanes, Na
apposing Flaw Rate, Vo (vph)
,
Prop. of LT in Dpp. VoI. Plto
Sop = 180oN❑r(l+Fito((400+vm)etc. '
Yo = Vo/S❑p
Gu ~ (4-CYo)A(1-Ya)
Fs = (575-0.625Vo)/1000
P1 = Plt[1+(N-1)gI(FsGu+4.5)] 'J
Gq - g - Giu
Pt = i - F'1 Gf = 2Pt[1-Pt^(.5GQ)],1P1 :
E1 = 18001 (1440-Vo)
-
Fm s Gf f g + Gu/g *[1/ {1+Pl etc. I
Flt = (Fn + N - I)IN
WILSEY &HM , Bellevue, WA< , using NCAF by PSI
---_--__--------------------------rr--------------------------i_---------------
~ -
i ;
; i
s1o
~
Intersection : SuZlivat1 & South { ES ) Ramp i3ate: Sept 51991
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriod An1yzd:PM PEAK Frea Type: CSD Xt3ther
Project N4.1995 w/proj City/State:no mitig,wJPrice
CAPACITY ANAiaYSIS WQRKSHEET
- L,ANE GROUF 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9
Adjusted Ad.Sat Flow Ratio Greera Ln,Grp vJC Crit.
~ 1 2 Flaw Rate F1w.Rt Ratio C'apac. Ratio ?
_ Appr. Mvmt. v s V/s g / C c,vph }C Lane
' (vph) (vPhg) 3O4 4x6 3/7 crDUp
° EB J 1649 - 4572 0.361 - 0.333 1524 1.082
' wH
NB D 2103 - 5237 0.402 - 0.333 1746 1.205
SB C 2291 - 7077 0.324 ~ 0.650 4600 0.498 ~
'----s---i-----------------------------------------------___------------------
Cycle Length= 60.0sec, Lgst TimefCycle,L= 8.0seC, S(v/S)Ci= 0.762, xC=0.880
LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS- * * = 1PRgTCTI3, = PERMTTQ. #if = PRflTCTD & PERMTTD ]
c - J ~ o
* *
v v
-------------_-___-----___---------------------------=r~--s_s______------__--
inTILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WA< , using NCAP by PSI
S i1
L _
Intersect'on: -------------------------i---------
~Sull~~an & ~outh ~
(EI) Ramp ❑ate:5apt 5 1991 Analyst:LAJ TimePeri,~d AnZyzd:PM PFAK Area Type: CHD XOther 'Project No.1995 w1prQj Gxty/5tate:no mitig,w/Price
LEVEL-dF-SERVZCE WORKSHEET
First Term Delay Second Term aelay Tot.pelay_&-LOS
L.ANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
GRC+UP V/c Green Cycle pelay Lane Delay Prqrsn Lane Gp Ln Appreh Apr
--a~- Ratia Ratio LengtYa di Group d2 Fact❑r Delay Gp Delay L❑S
1 2 X g/C c sec/veh Cap,c sec{deh PF sec/veh La5 sec/veh Tbl
Ap Mv (see) (vph) T.9-13 (6+8)*9 9-1 9-1
EB J 1.082 0. 333 60.0 15.85 1524 43.83 0.85 50.73 E 50.73 E
*
WB 0.00
NB C] 1.205 0.333 50.0 16.93 1746 109.24 0.61 76.96 F 76.96 F'
-
SB C 0.498 0.554 60.0 4.13 4600 0.07 0.40 1.68 A 1.68 AIntersection belay 41.26 sec/veh, Intersection LDS E ~able 9.1 _
LANE GRVCTP DIAGRAMS- [ * * * = PRC]TCTL1. = PERMTTD, = PRL3TGTD & PERMTTD]
C " J " O
~t *
v v
WILSEY &HAP't , Bellewe, WA< , using NCAP by PSI
~ -
~
I
-
u 512
f ~..r~aJ`
~---------.=--.t----.r--------- e--
INPU'I' WQRKSHEET
Intersectian:Sullivan & 5outh (EH) Ramp Qate:Sept 5 1991
Analyst;LAJ TimePeriad An1yzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CSG XOther
Pxaject Na. 19 9 5A test City f State : f ourth test
VQLCTME ANO GE4METRICS SULLIi7AN N j 5 53'.
(1sa5) a ^
- ~ s g TaTAL z 2 -
I I I 12.0 0 E- ~ a]
- < v > 1 12.0 -ws momAL
(ld) 0 1546 269 TH LT Q a
' I'll -----s-er-------- I > -------------=-'t
NORTH v
, 2 -1Z , a' -LT
IDENTIFY IN DYAGRAM 1=12. Q'-RT ---v "
. 1.Volumes I > ,--_--------_-w_-
2.Lanes,lane widths TH RT RAMpS
'3.Movements by lane ^ 501 12.0 ~ E/W STREET
4.Parking Yoeatians - I 12.0 1456
S.Bay storge ingths [1349] 0 z 1 0 e~> 235
6.1slancis E1B TaTAL - [1723]
7. Bus staps v 84$ NrB TO'I'A3,
TRAFE'IC AND ROADWAY CONDITIC?NS
' Ap Grd. % HV Adj. Pkg. Lane Suses PHF Cnf. Ped Pedstrn Buttan Arr.
.
pr Y/N Nm (Nb) [pdehr) Y/N Mn.Time Type
EB +0.0 2.0 N , Q 0 0.90 ZO N 23 3
WB+0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 23 3
- NB +a. 0' 2.0 Id 0 I] 0.90 20 N 12 5
~SB +0.0 2.0 N fl 0 0.90 20 N 12 5
-'_--e___-_i----r-------_-Y----------------------~._---------------------------
~Grade:+uP.-down Nb•buses stogping]hr Min.Timing• min.green for
,I-IV: veh 4 whls PHF. peak-hour factor pedestrian ❑rossing
~Nm_pkg_maneuVersfhrCnf_Peds_Cnflctng_peds/hrs--Arr_Type-~Type=1=5==T}_'~_~
PHASING
I * __------*----------------,~~_-------_~______.,..._.___--------------~,a__.o
p
I
~ A v v
- G ^
R
- A
I m
* V
IT im- G= 8.0 G= 27.0 G= 23.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0
ing Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= a
- 'I Ptnnd/Act l A A A
Pratected turns: opoo^ I Permitted turns: I Cyc1e Length 66 ~Sec
-------------l-------_---__c__--____--__-----------------_-----------_-_-_4__
I WgLSEY & TiAM .Bellevue, WA< , using NCAP by P5I
513
f
I '
------------------------------------------------------------------s...o---------r
Intersection:Sullivan & South (EBIJ) Ramp Date.Sept 5 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePQriod Anlyzd:FM PEAK Area Type: CBD Xflther
Project No. 1995A test City/State: faurth test
VDLUME AD►TLISTNIENT WORKSHEET
1 2 3 a 5 s a s 9 io 11
Appr. MVt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flw rt Number Lane Adj. Prap.
VaTume Hour Rate Group in Ln af Utiliz Flaw of
(vph) Factor Vp Grp Vg Lanes Fctr,U V,vph LT ar RT
PHF 3j4 ~ (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Plt , Prt
s---- ---s__
LT 501 0.90 557 4.37 LT
EB TH a 0.90 0 J 1499 3 l.l❑ 1649
RT 848 0.90 942 0.53 RT
LT 4 0.90 D 0.00 LT
WB TH Q 0.90 f] *
RT 0 0.90 0.00 RT
' IaT D 0.90 0 0.00 LT
NB TIi 1486 0.90 1651 0 1912 3 1.10 2103 *
RT 235 0.90 261 0.14 RT
LT 269 0.90 299 0.14 LT
SB TH 1506 0.90 1784 C 2083 4 1.10 2291
*
RT 0 0.90 0 0.00 RT
---------r-_----=o-------------..____--_-----___---_-_-_-----------_____-___er
I.ANE GROUg DIAGRAMS- [ = PRO'I'+CTD, = PERMTTD, = PRDTCTD & PERMTTD] ~ u
-------------------------rerr__!!_--------------a---____-------_____-:-----__
C " ~.T " [3 ~ .
v v ~
~
WILSEY & HAM ,Be1levue,,WAc ~ using NCAP by FSI
~
~ ,
' S14
I
y n
zntersection,Sullivan & South (EH) Ramp IDate:Sept 5 1991
AnaYyst : LAJ Ts.meperiod Anlyzd: PM, PEAK Area Type : G8D }CVther
Praject Na.1995A test City/state:fourth test
SATL1RATION FLDW A3]JUSTMENT W[3RKSHEET
7ANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12__~~...13_
,;RO[JP Idea1 No.Lri . W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk AreaTp Ftt Trn, Lt Trn Acla Sat
Sat. of F'w Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt F'lt F1wRt
2 F1ow Lns --=a-- s
kp Mv pcphgp N T.9-5 T.9-5 T.9-7 m.9-8 T.9-9 T.5-10 T.9-11 T.9-12 (vPhg)
`"B
J 1$00 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.9[}6 0.944 4572
IS 0 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.980 1.000 5237
iB C 1800 4 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.993 7077
LANE GRc3[]P I3IAGRAMS- [ = PRC}''CT;D, = PERMI''D, = PROZ"C''D & PERM`'TI]] -
~-------------------o-____----e----------------------i--------__-___----------
C ^ J ^ ❑
F ****a
* ~r
v v
-----___------_----------e------------s-----------------------__T------------
~ WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WA< ,using NCAF by PSI
;i
' S15
Intersection:Sul2ivan-&--South (EBI)Ramp------------Date:Sept 5 1991-----------
Analyst:LAJ TimePeri"od Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther
Praject Na.1995A test City/State:fourth test
SUPPLEMENTAL WQR.KSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTflR, fLT
INPUT VARIAaLES/COMPUTATIONS EB WB NB SS
Cycie Length, C (sec)
Effective Green, 9 (sec)
Number of Lanes, N
Tvta 1 Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph)'
Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vgh) , -
Left-Turn Fkow Rate, Vlt (vph) '
Prvpvrtion af LT, glt
Oppos ing Lanes, Na
opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vPh)
Frop. caf LT in Opp. Vol. Plto s❑p = 1800Ne/(1+Plto((400+Vm)etc.
Ya = Vv15ap
Gu = (g-CYa)1(1-Y0)
Fs = ($75-0.625Vo)/1000 Pi = Pltfi+(rt-i) g/(Fscu+4. 5)] _
Gq=g -Gu
Pt = 1 - P1
cf = zPt(i-Pt^{.5Gq)]1P1 ;
El _ 1800O(1400-Uo)
Fm = Gf/g + Gutg * [1/{l+pl etc.
F1t _ (F'm + N - 1)IN
-------~~--__----------------------------.:_---r-_-----------------_-----__i-- 1
WILSEY &HAM , Bellevue, WA[ , Ltsirig NCAP hy PSI -4
~
I J
' s1€
~
~ Intersection:Sullivan & South (EB) Ramp Date:Sept 51991
.~na1~s~;LAJ' TimePeriod An1yzd;PM FEAK Area Type: CBD XOther
Project No.1995A test City/5tate:fourth test
' CAPAGITY ANALYSIS WaRKSHEET
LANE GROUP 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9
Adjusted Ad.Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln,Grp, v1C Crit.
i 2 Flaw Rate F1w.Rt Ratio Gapac. Ratio ?
Appr. Mvmt. v s V/s g/ G c,vph }C Lane
, (vph) (vghg) 314 4x6 3/7 GrQUp
EB J 1649 - 4572 0.361 ~ 0.348 1593 1.035
; WB
NB 0 2103 - 5237 ❑.402 - 0.409 2142 0.982
-
Sa C 2291 - 7077 0.324 ~ 0.591 4182 0.548
-
_ cYcle Length= 66.osec, Lost fiime/cYclerr,= 8.0sec, s(v/s)ci= 0.762, xc=0.$67
~_____--__--------_---_-`------------------------------__-_-----_--i----------
' LANE GRaUP DIAGRAMS- = PRC3TG'I'D, ++-h R PERMTTI3, = PROTCTb & PERMTTD]
----------_---_-------------e____---__-------------------___-------T_-s--_-----
I c A J 0
I v V
inFILSEY &HAM , Bellevue, WAr , using NCAP by PST
S27
~I
-
Intersection.Sullivan & 5rt~uth (E~) Ramp Date Sept 5 1991
Analyst : LAJ TimePeriNOd Anlyzd; PM PEAK Area Type : CBD Xather
Project Na.1995A test CityeState:fourth test
LEVEL-QF-SIERVICE WORKSHEET
First Term Delay Second 3°errn ❑elay Tat- Delay_&TLOS
LANE 3 4 5 fi 7 8 3 10 il 12 13 -
GROUP v/c Green Cycle pelay Lane oelay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apprch Apr
Ratio Ratio Length d1 Group d2 Factvr Delay Gp aelay LDS
l. 2 X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/ Veh PF sec/veh LO5 sec/veh T}al
Ap Mv (sec) (vph) T.9-13 (6+8)*9 s-i 9-1
E8 J 1.035 0.348 66.0 16.65 1593 2+6.44 0.85 36.63 D 36.53 D
~
-o---- s-- a--
ws 0.00
*
NS 0 0.982 0.409 66.0 14.53 2142 11.55 0.51 15.97 G 15.97 C~
I
SB C 0.54$ 0.591 66.0 6.21 41$2 0.12 0.40 2.53 A 2.53 ,A
Intersection Delay 16.51 sec/veh, Intersectiarr LDS c fiaYale 9.1
LANE GRC7LFP T]IAGRANfiS- [ = PROTCTD, = PERMTTD, _ PROTCTD & PERMTTD]
c ~ J A o
~
~
w v
__---_-------___--_____-----------------_ww..---------------------..____
WILSEY & HAM , Belletrue. WA< ~ using NCAF by PST
~
~
' S1$
~
- NORTH RAMP
i
1995 Base Traffic Without De►aelogment N1-1V6
1995 with Froposed SgQkane Valley P1aza/Price' N7-NT2
Development Traffic
1995 with Prvpnsed 5pokane Valley P]aza/F'rice IV13-N18
D evelopmentfMitigation
I • • ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ fr~+:~fr~ ~_rJ '
INPCF'I" W❑RKSI-IEE'I`
-~Intersection:Sullivan & North (WB) Rarnps Date:Sept 5, 1991
Analyst:LA.T TimePeriad Anlyzd:PM FEAI{ Area Tyge: CHd XOther
- Project No.1995 SASE CityPState:resignaii2ed
'L»LLME AND GEDMETRTCS , SULI,IVAN N/S ST.
- [1830] 85 ^
5H' TOTAI+ 1 2 -
12.0 ~ a[- [21[])
_ [ v > 1 12.0 -WB TOTAL
N 475 1355 0 RT TH 125 v
[ ~
NORTH v " ---FtT-12 . 0' -1
" v ---I,T-l2. U' -2
IDENTIF'Y IN DIAGRAM ^
1.Volumes < ~
2.Lanes, lane widths LT TH RAMPS
3.Movements by lane ^ 0 12.0 ~ E/W STREET
4. Par]ting locations 12.0 980
5,Bay staxge lngths [ 01 0 2 2 235 c^> 0
6, Fslanr3s E/B To°rAL - (1215]
- 7. Bus stops v 0 NIB TOTAL
TRAFFYC AND RDADWAY +CaNDTTIUNS
_ Ap Grd. ~ HV Adj,Pkg.Lane Buses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn 8uttan Arr,
;pr YIN Nm {Nb) (pd/hr) Y]N Mn.Time Type
JEB +0, Q 2.0 N fl 0 ❑.90 20 N 27 3
' WF3 +0. 0 2.0 N 4 0 0.90 20 ld 27 3
~ NB +0.0 2.0 N p O 0.90 20 N 12 3
- SH +I7.d 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 20 Ai 12 3
~--GY---r---es__-=----------------___-__----____-o-___-____--_o-_--_----------
' Grade:+up,-dawn Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Timing: min.grreen far
HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-houx factar pedestrian crrssing
1Nm:pkg.maneuvers Jhr Cnf. Peds: Cnflctng peds/hr Arr. Type: Type 1-5
--------~_~.~_~_.~.~~__---------@_~----------~---------__~_i---------------------~
----.~ss_---------__--_______------------------------------------------~_~-~------
PHASING
~ =------...-,-,-~-_~,r.-,--_.-,~~_-.~~-_-_--~__-____-__-___~_~~-_.~
~ A
~ D
II ~ ~ ]f ii !f ]f if A '~f
A V
j G v
R ~
~ A ~ ~t * x
i m
---o---- ------=e -------s
Tim- G- 8.0 G= 25.0 G= 10.0 G= 0.4 G= 0.0 G= 0,0 G- 0.0 G= 0,0
. ing Y+R= 4Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 0 1t+R= 0
- -i------ T----
Ptmd~'Act ~ A A A ~
~Pratected turns: ❑vao^ I Permitted turns: I G'ycle Length 60 Sec
~ ---------------_-=---i-----------------------.._--------------_c=_-----------
~ WYLSEY & HAM , Be1levue, WA< using NCAP by P5I
Nl
Intersection:5ullivan & North (W~~) Ramps Date:Sept 5. 1991
Ana1yst:L,A~' TimePeri,od An1yzd:FM PEATC Area Type: CBD XOther
Prvject Nv.1995 BASE CityJState:resignaZized
VOL[IME ADJiJSTMENT WDRKSHEET
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -
Appr. IHvt. Mirt. Peak Flaw Lane Flw rt Number Lane Adj. Prop.
Volume Hour Rate ~Group in Ln af Utiliz Flow of
{vph} Factar Vp Grp Vg Lanes Fctr,i7 V,vph LT or RT
PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Plt , Prt
LT Q 0.90 C] 0 0 LT
EB TH 0 0.9❑ D *
RT Q 0.90 D 0.00 RT
LT 125 0.90 139 0.60 LT
WB TH 0 0.90 0 1 233 3 1.10 255 *
RT 85 [}.90 94 0.40 RT
L'I' 235 0.90 261 0.19 LT
Ns TH 980 0.90 1089 C 1354 4 1.10 1485 *
RT 0 0.90 U 0.00 RT
LT D 0.90 ❑ 0.00 LT SB TH 1355 0.90 1506 0 2434 3 1.10 2237 *
RT 475 0.90 528 0.26 RT
------------------------------------------------__.,_-:_------------i_-------- LANE GR[3'{JP DIAGRAMS- [ * * * = PRaTCTD, = FE~'!' TTO. = PROTCTD & PERMTTI? ] ~
------------------------------------------..--o-----_____----------__--__-----
C " J " Q
~ ~ -
V V
wILSEY & HAM , aellevue, WA< , usinq NeAP by PsI
-------------------------------i-i_---__-__-----------------___sr------------__I
, N2
~
I~ '
Intersection:Sullivan & NQrth (WB) Ramps Date:Sept 5, 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimeFeriod Anlyzd:PM FEAK Area Type: CBD XOther
PrQject No.1995 BASE City/State.resignalized
SATUR.A,TION FLOW ADJ[]STMENT WflRKSHEET
- LANE 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9 10 11 12 13
' GROIIP Ideal No. Ln.W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk ArsaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat
Sat. of Fw Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt F1wRt
1 2 Flaw Lns S
-'Ap MW pcph+gp N T.9-5 T.9-6 T.9-7 T.9-8 T.9-9 Z°.9-10 T.9-11 T.9-12 (aPhg)
- ES
`RB J 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.939 0.911 4573
NB C 1800 4 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.990 7060
SB D 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.961 1.000 5138
T.ANE GFtDUP DIACRAMS-[ = PRaTCTD, = PERMTTD, = FROTCTD & PERMTTD]
------------------------------------r-----------------------_----___--_______
; C " J 0
~~*~r~
- ~ *
v v
WILSEY & HAM , Se]..levue, WA[ , using NCAP by P5I
i
N3
1
Intersection:Sullivan & Narth (W8) Ramps Date:Sept 5, 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type, GBD XOther
Praject N4.1995 SASE CityfState:resignalized
SUPPLEMENTAL WORI{SHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJ[]STMENT F'P,CTC]R, fLT
-------_~v.4------------------------------------------
INPUT VARIABLES/CQMPUTATIQNS EB WB NB SB ~
Cyele Length, C (sec)
Effective Green, g (5ec)
Number af Lanes, N
Total Approach Flow Rate, Va{vph}
Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph)
Left-Turn Flcaw Rate, Vlt (vFh)
Praportion of T,T, Flt ~
Opposinq Lanes, Nv
Oppas3ng Flow Rate. Va (vph)
Prop. ❑f LT in Dgp. Vol. Plta
5ap = 180DNa/(1+Plto[ {40D+Vm}etc.
YE's = Vv/avp
cu = (g-cYa) 1 (1-Yo)
Fs = (875-0.625vo)t1000
~
P1 = P1t[1+(N-1)gf(FsGu+4.5)]
Gq=g - Gu
Pt = 1 - P1 -
Gf = 2Pt[1-Pt^(.5Gq)]/P1
El = 1800/ (1400--Vo)
Fm = Gf/g + Gu/g * [I/ (1+P1 etc.
Flt = (Fm + N - 1) /N ~
WILSEY & HAM , Sel].evue, WA< , using NCAP by PSI
----------------------------__--.,._-__---------------------------__--__-r-------
, I
d ~
N4
,
I--,
Intersectinn. Su1liVan & North ('WB) Ramps ❑ate: Sept 5, 1991
- Analyst:LAJ TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther
Praject No.1995 BASE City/State:resignalized
; CAPACITY ANALYSIS WC3RIKSHEET
LANE GRDUP 3 4 5 G 7 8 9
' Adjusted Ad.Sat F'low Ratio Green Ln.Grg v/C Crit.
1 2 Flaw Rate F1w.Rt Rativ Capac. Ratio ?
Agpr. Mvmt. v s Vts q/ C c,vph 7{ Lane
(vgh) (vpt'yg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Group
i-- EB
I ---r---
WB J 256 - 4573 0.056 - ❑.157 762 0.336
~ NB C 1485 - 7060 0.210 - 0.517 4354 0.341 -
S8 0 2237 r 5138 0.435 - 0.417 2141 1.045
-----------------------------------------i-__----_---------_--_-_______------
Cycle Length= 60.4sec, Lost Time/Cycle,L= B.Osec, 5[v/S]ci= 0.491, Xc=0.557
LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS- [ * = PRC]TCTD, = PERMTTD, = PROTCT'❑ & PERMTTQ]
c A a ~ o
* *
V V
' WILSEY &HAM , Bellevue. WAc , using NCAP by PsI
---------------------------_-_-w---------_!_---------------------__------------
; N5
InterseGtivn:Sullivan &Narth (WB'f) Ramps Date:Sept 5. 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePerivd Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther -
Prvject No.1995 BASE City/State:resignalized
LEVEL-vF-SERVICE W❑RKSHEET
First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tot.Delay_&^LOS
LANE 3 4 5 6 7 $ 9 10 11 12 13
GROUP V/c Green Cyc1e Delay Lane De1ay Prgrsn Lane Gg Ln Apprch Apr
Rativ Ratia Length d1 Group d2 Factor Delay Gp Delay LDS -
1 2 x g/C c sec]veh Cap,c sec/ueh PF sec/ueh LO8 sec]veh Tbl
Ap Mv (seG) (vph) T.9-13 (6+8)*9 9-1 9-1
E8 4.00 *
W$ 0.336 0.157 60.0 16.77~'~ 762 0.10 0.85 14.34 B 14.34 8
Na C 0.341 0.617 60.0 4.24 4354 0.02 0.85 3.62 A 3.62 A_
SB O 1.045 0.43.7 60.0 13.74 2141 27.22 0.85 34.82 D 34.82 U~
-----__-c-----------------------------------------------------_--_-------------
Intersection Delay 21,86 sec/veh, Intersection LdS C Table 9.1
LANE G1z0UP DIAGRp,MS- [ * = PROTCTD, = PERMTTD, = PR4TCTD & PERMTTD]
------r---------____--_---------------------------_--------------------------
C " J " 0
* *
v v ~
WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WAr ~using NCAP by PSI ~
~
,
1
j Nfi
~ -
. r ` r~ ~ ~ 1~~ a`-r ~r r;~ , 34:
f
irrPUr waRKSHEET
intersection, Sullivan & North (WB) Ramps Date: Sept. 5. 1991
Ana lyst: LAJ TimePer iod Anlyzd. PM PEAK Area Type : C$p Xc]ther
Project Nv.1995 ACTION City/5tate:3-phase, w/Price
VOLUME AND GEdMETRICS SULI~IVAN ~+TIS ST.
I- [~~05] 85 ^
" SB TOTAL 1 2 -
I 1 1 12.0 1 [ 270]
. t v > 1 12.0 -WB TDTAL
(N) 535 1670 E7 RT TH 185 v
III [ I ----__=_a--------
1dQRTH V "---RT-12 . 0' -1
v ---LT-12.0'-2
- IDENTIFY IN I3IACRAM "
1.VraYumes C ~ ---------------:r
- 2. Lanes, lane widths LT TH - S
_ 3. M❑Vements by lane ^ 0 12.0 1 E f W STREET
4.Farking lacations 1 12.0 1296
S.Bay starge lngths [ 0] 0 z Z 691 0
6 . Islands E1B TQTAL - [1987]
- 7.Bus stops v 0 N f B TOTAL
TR.P,FFIC AND Rt3ADWAY CONDITIONS
, Ap Grd. ~ HV Adj. Pkg. Lane 8uses PHF Cnf. Ped Pedstrn Hutton Arr.
pr (t) Y/N Nm (Nb) (Pd/hr) YIN Mn.Time Type
EB +O.Q 2.4 N 0 0 8.90 20 N 23 3
WS +0.0 2.0 N Q A 0.90 20 N 23 3
NB +0.0 2.0 N a o 0.90 20 N 11 3
SB +0.0 2.0 N 0 0 0.90 20 N 11 3
Grade .+up, -doran Nb: buses stopping/hr Min. Timing : min. green for
HV:veh. > 4 whls PHF:peak-hour factar pedestrian crossing
Nm : pkg .maneuvers/hr Cnf. Peds . Cnf lctng peds jhr Arr. Type : Type 1-5 .
PHAS Y NG
t ^
D * *
A v ~
, G v
, R
A
m
- T im- G= 8.0 G= 28.0 G= 10.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G- 0.0
irsg Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 0 Y+R= 9 Y+R= 0 Y+R= D Y+R= 0
Ptmd/Acti A A A
Prvtected turns: ooQa" I Permitted turns: I Cycle Length 60 Sec
WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WA< , tasing NCAP by PSI
IN7
I-ES:-es-~---~-^-r~~~~~~~~~~--~.-a.- ~ -o~~-a-er--~.---a~~~~~~~~~~~~~-.t~~~- -------r~
Inte~Section:Sulii~an & North ~W'~) Ram~s Qate:Sspt. 5, 1991 -
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriad An1yzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD Xather -
Project NQ.1995 ACTIaN City/State:3-phase, wlPrice
VOLLIME ADJUSTMENT Wf3RKSHEET
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 -
Appr. Mvt. Mvt. Peak Flow Lane Flw rt Number Lane Adj. Prop.
Valume Hour Rate Group in Ln of Utiliz Flow of
{Vpn) Factar Vp Grp Vg Lanes FctY,U V.vph LT or RT
PHF 3/4 (vph) N Tb 9-4 7 x 9 Pit , Prt
LT Q 0.90 0 0.00 LT
EB Tx 0 0.90 a *
RT 0 0.90 a 0.00 RT ,
L'F 185 0.90 206 0.69 IrT
WB TH 0 0.90 0 1 300 3 1.14 330 *
RT $5 41.94 94 0.31 RT
LT 691 0.90 768 0.35 LT
NB TH 1296 0.90 1440 C 2208 4 1.10 2429 *
RT 0 0.90 0 0.00 RT
LT 0 0.90 0.00 LT
SB TH 1570 (].90 1855 C] 2450 3 1.10 2695 *
R'I' 535 0.90 594 0.24 RT
LANE GRC7UP DIAGRAMS-[*** = F'FtCJTCTd, = PERMTTD, = PRDTCTD & PERMTTO]
------------------------------____-------_---------_ow-_------_r_-------------
c ~ i.a A ►d
if if ii i¢ ~ 7f '!C R if if lf Zf , '
~ E
v v
--WILSEY'&=~~--He],levue, WAC __`_~~~_using N~CAPlhy_PSI~---
---___~-_-___T------
I'
, N8
Intersection r Sullivan &Narth {WB} Ramps Date: 5ept. 5, 1991
- Analyst: LA.7 TimePerivd Anlyzd: PM PEAK Area Type: CQD 7C[]ther
Prvject Na.1995 ACTIOA1 City/State:3-phase; wjPrice
; SATURATION FLOW ,ApJL1STMENT WORKSHEET
LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
iGRQiJP Idea 1 Na. Lra. W. HvyVeh Grade Pkg. Bus81k AreaTp Rt Trn Lt Trn Adj Sat
Sat. ❑f Fa Fhv Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt F1t FlwRt
1 2, Flow Lns ---G-- S
;Ap Mv pcphgp N T. 9-5 T. 9-5 T. 9-7 T.9-8 T. 9-9 T. 9-10 T. 9l11 T. 9-12:(vph9)
, EB
,RB J 1800 3 1.000 99D 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.953 0.897 4570
-AB C 1800 4 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.983 7006
i
'3B Q 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.964 1.000 5152
_ LANE GRQUF DIpGFTAlyfS- * * _ PROTC'I'If, = PEP1ITTDr _ PR{7TC'.L'D & FERMTTD ]
C " J ^ 0
v v
W3LSEY & IiAM ,Bellevue, WAr , using NC1AP by PSI
' , N9
, ir-i----ar---rs----'------ri-----:-'rs-'----- I
Interseation:Sullivan & North (WB) Ramps Date:Sept. 5, 1991
Analyst: LAJ TimePeri I od An1yzd: PM pEAIC Area Type. CED XOther -
Project No.1995 ACTION City/State:3-phase, w/F'rice
Si7PPLEME1+1TAL WOR,KSHEET FflH ]C+EFT-TVRI+i ADJUSTMENT FAGTC7R, fLT
INPUT VARIABLESJ~OMPUTATIONS ES Tn'fB NB SB
Cycle Length, C (sec)
Effective Green, g (sec)
Number of Lanes, N
Total Approach Flow Rate, Va(vph)
Mainline Flaw Rate, Vm (Vph)
Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph)
Prapartion of LT, Plt
apposing Lanes, N❑
vpposing F1❑w Rate, Vo (vph)
Frmp. af LT in flpp. Val. Flta -
Sop = 180ONo/{1+Plto[ (4D❑+Vm) etc.
Yo = Vo/Sop i
~
Gu = (g-CYfl)I(l-Yo)
Fs = (875=0, fi25Vo)/10Ck0
Pl = Plt[l+(N=l)gI (FsGu+4.5)]
Gq -g - Gu
Pt = 1 - P1
Gf = 2Pt [ 1-Ft" ( . 5Gq)] /P1
E1 ~ 1$00A (1400-Vo) ~
Fm = Gf/g + Gu/g 1/ (1.+PT etc. !
Flt = (Fm + N - I)IN
WILSEY & HAM , BE:lleVUe, WAC , L151T1g NCAP by PSI
~
,i
' N1o
I~~
, i
---------------o ------------------------e ----------r--e------------------------
~ Antersection:Sullivan & Narth (WB) Ramps Uate;Sept. 5. 1991
Analyst:iA.7 TimePerind Anlyzd:FM PEAIC Area Type: CBD XOther
Prvject Na.1995 ACTION Gity/State:3-phase, w/Price
GAPACITY ANALYSIS WC]RY{SHEET
- LANE GROT,JP 3 4 5 5 7 S 9
Adjusted Ad.Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Gxp v/C Crit.'
1 2 Flaw Rate Flw, Rt. Ratio Capac. Ratio ?
_ Appr. Mvmt. v s v1s g / C'e,vph X Lane
(vph) (vFM9 ) 3 /4 4x 6 3/7 Gr aup
~
EB
~ WB J 330 - 4570 0.072 - 0.167 7+62 0.433
, NB C 2429 - , 70[]6 0.347 - 0.667 4671 0.520 -
SB 0 2595 - 5152 0,523 - 0.467 2404 1.121
; ------__----------_--------------------------------------------r_-----=-rr___
GyCle Length= 60,OSeC, LDSt 'd'lIDe/CyCle?rI-- 8.05eG, S(VfS)C1= 0.595, XC=0.687
_------------------------------..-__-i--___--_---______------_----------------
LANE GRDL]P DIAGRAMS- [ = PROTC'Y'D, = y'ERMTTD, = PFtC3TGTD & PERMTTD ]
-----------------__--w---o------------------------»--__-___-__--------------
C " J ^ 0
* *
~
v v
;------------,_-_r--------------------------_------_--____------------_-_-____
I WIT,SEY & HAM , BelleVUe. WI1C , using NCAF hy F'SI
i
N1 I
---------i_-___--..-o_____..o------ i A__s,------------y------------^-------_- -
Intersectian:Sullivan & Nflrth {wB} Ramps Date.Sept. 5. 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePerilod Anlyzd:PM PFAK Area Type: CBD XOther
Praject Nca. 1'995 ACmIC3,N City/Statt? : 3-phase , w f Prlce
LEVEL-QF-SEFtVICE WOFtKSHEET
First 'I"erlm Delay Second Term ❑elay Tot. Delay &TLOS
LAN E 3 4 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13
GRVVP v/ c Green Cycle Delay Lane ❑elay Prgrsn Larte Gp Ln Apprch Agr
Ratia Rativ Length dl Group d2 Factor Iielay Gp Delay LDS
1 Z X g/C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh FF sec/veh LOS secfVeh Tbl
Ap Mv (sec) ~(Vph) T.9-13 {6+$} *9 9-1 9-1
*
EH 0.00
WB J 0.433 0.157 60.0 17. 071 •762 0.26 0.85 14.73 B 14.73 B
NS C 0.520 0.667 60.0 3.88 4671 0.09 0.85 3.37 A 3.37 A
Sg ❑1.121 0.467 60.0 13.60. 2404 58.53 0.85 61.40 F 51.40 F
IntersectivraDelay 32.73 sec/Veh. Intersectian LO5 D Table 9.1
-----------------------_-__-__----------------_-_-------____--a-----------____
LANE GROUP DIAGRAMS- [ = PROTCTO, = PERNITTQ, = PRg'I"CTD & PERMTTD]
c A J A O
v v I
WILSEY & HAM .Bellevue, WA< ~ using NCAP by PS3 _
~
~
N12
~
r
.
~ ~ " • .
~ a°~ ~ ,~c,~,.~►~ ~ ~r~ ~~1~~ N~ P~_!'~
INPUT
INPUT WaRKSHEET
intersection : Su11 ivan & North (inTB) Ramps Date : Sept. 5, 1991
Analyst : LAJ TimePeriod Anlyzd: PM PEAK Area 'I'ype : GBD Xather
Project Nv, 1995 ACTIC]N City/State:3-phase, w,IPriee
VOLUME AND GEOMETRICS SCi"LLIVAN NIS ST.
- [2245] 85 ^
" 5B TQTAL 1 2 ~
~ 1 1 12.0 1 0 [ 270]
_ [ v > 1 12.0 -WS TOTAL
' (N) 535 1670 0 RTH TH 185 v
~
i,
' III < I
NoRTx v v A---RT- i z. o f- i
v---LT-12 . 43' -2
- IDENTIFY IN pIAGRAM "
i 1.V0111111e5 C I ----------lT----=
' Z. Lanes ,lane widths L'Y` Tfi RAMP5
3.Movements by lane " D 12.0 1 E/W STREET
; 4.Parking 1ocations - ~ 12.0 1296
5.say storge ingths [ o] 4 2 2 591 o
b. Islands E/B °I'OTAL - [1987]
7.Bus staps v 0 N/S TQTAL
TRAFFIG AND ROAaWAY CflNpITIQHS
_ Ap Grr3. -t HV Adj.Pkg.Lane Huses PHF Cnf.Ped Pedstrn Buttvn Arr.
pr (t) Y/N Nm [Nb] (gd/hr) YfN Mn.Time Type
EB +Q.Q 2.0 N a ❑ 0.90 20 N 20 3
WS +Q.Q 2.0 N D 4 0.90 20 N 26 3
' NB +D. 2.0 N a 0 0.90 20 N 11 3
SB +0.0 2.0 AI 0 D 0.90 20 N ~ 11 3
..v__---__-----------------------------------------------------_l=----.._------
Grade:+up,-dawn Nb:buses stopping/hr Min.Txming: min.green for
HV:veh. 5 4 whls PHF:peak-hour facterr pedestrian crossing
Nm:pkg.maneuvers/hr Cnf.P+eds:Cnflctng pedsfhr Arr.Type: Type 1-5
PHABYNG
~ ~ r~.t----------_._._....---_-------
,
D * *
~ Y
A V *
G v
R ^ ^
A *
m
~ at
Tim- G= 10.0 G= 60. 0 G= 8.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0
ing Y+R= 4Y+R= 4 Y+R= 4 Y+R= 0 Y+R= O Y+R= a Y+R= UY+R= 0
Ptmd]Acti A A A
PrateGted turns: ooaa^ I Permitted turns. I Cycle Length 86 sec
WILSEY & HAfi+I , Be118V11Br WAC ~ us1ng NCAP by PSY
NI3
------------------_-_-a_-------------------------------------------------------
IntersectiQn.Sullivan & North (WBq,) Ramps ❑ate:5ept. 5, 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePeri~pd Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: GSD XOther
Pzvject No.1995 ACTIDN CityJSitate:3-phase, w/Price
VOLUME AD'JUSTNIENT WQRKSHEE'i'
- ~
1 2 3 4 5 i 6 7 s 9 so 11
Appr. Mut. Mvt. Peak Flow ;Lane Flw rt Num}aer Lane Adj. Prgp.
Valuime Hour Rate droup in Ln vf Utiliz Flow af
(vph) Factar Up ~ Grp Vg Lanes Fctr, U V, vph LT or RT
PHF 3/4 ~ (vph) N Tb 9-4 7x 9 Plt , Prt
LT 0 0.90 0 ~ 0.00 LT
EH TH 0 0.90 D *
RT 0 0.90 0 ~ 0.00 RT
LT 185 0.90 206 ~ 0.59 LT
WS TH 4 0.90 0; J 300 3 1.10 330 *
RT 85 0.90 94 ; 4.31 R'I'
LT 691 0.30 768 ~ 0.35 LT
NS TH 1295 0.90 1440 j{C 2208 4 1.10 2429 *
RT D (}.90 D; 0.00 RT
LT ❑ 0.90 0 i 0.00 LT
SB TH 1670 0.90 1856 i 0 2450 3 1.10 2595 *
RT 535 0.90 594 ; 0.24 RT
I
LANE GRC)CIP DiAGFAMS- = PROTCTD. = PERMTTI], M = PRaTCTd & PERM'I'TD ]
C " J ^ 0 i
* *
****y
v v ;
_------------------------T___---_ '
WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, ~ WA< ~ using NCAP lay PSI
i _
i ~
I ~
I
i
i
I
I
I -
I i
I '
I Nl4
-
Ili
~ 7ntersection:5ullivan & North (WB)`Ramps`-`--`-----Date:Sept. 5, 1991
-Analyst : IA4T TimePeriod Artlyzd : PM, PEAK Area Type: CBD XOther
Project No.1995 ACTION City,IState:3-phase; w/Price SATURATZDild FLOW ADJUSTMENT FTQFtKSHEET
LANE 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
GROilP Idea7. No. Ln.W. HVyVeh Grade Pkg. BusBlk AreaTg Rt Trn Lt Trn AdjSat
Sat. ❑f Fw FhV Fg Fp Fbb Fa Frt Flt F1wRt
1 2 F1aw Lns S
,Ap Mv pcphgp N T.9-5 T.9-6 T.9r7 m.9-8 'Y'.9-9 T.9-10 'I'.9-11 T.9-12 (vPhg)
- E8
RB J 1800 3 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.400 1.000 0.953 0.897 4570
u's c1aoo 4 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.9$3 7006
'SS Q 1800 3' 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.964 1.000 5152
--------------------------------------_-_-_-----__..-_------_-_---------_i------
'LANE GR{3UP DIAGRAMS- [ = PROTCTI], = FERP4TT0, = PROTCTQ & PERMT'3'A]
C „ J A Q
v v
WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WA< , using NCAP by PSI
N15
Intersectian~Sullivani&TNvrth (WB~) ~amps-----i-----Date:Sept.-5, 1991----___-_
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriod An1yzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CBD xflther -
Praject No.1995 ACTION City/State:3-phaser w/Price
SUPPLEMENTAL WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR, fLT
INPUT VARIASLES/COMPUTATIONS ; ES WB NB SB
Cycle Length, C (sec)
Effeetive Green, g (sec) Number ❑f Lanes, N
Tvtal Approach Flaw Rate. Va(Vph)
I
Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph)
Left-Turn Flaw Rate, Vlt (vph)
,
Prapartifln of LT, Plt
Opposing Lanes, N❑
Opposing Flow Rate, VQ (vph)
Prop. of LT in app. Vol. Plt❑
Sop = 180ONn/tl+plto{(400+Vm)etG.
Yo = Vo/Sap
Gu = (g-CY0)I(1-ya)
Fs = (875-0.625Vo)/1000
Pl = plt(l+(N-l)g/(FsGu+4.5)]
Gq~g - Gu ~
Pt = 1 - Pi
Gf = 2Pt[1-Pt^{.SGq}]/P1
E1 = 18001(1400-Vo)
, Fm = Gf,g + Gutq * (11(1+P1 etC. ~
Flt = (Fq + N - 1) IN
WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue. 'WA< ,using NGAP by P5Y
I
I
I
~I
~
~
I
~
I
I
i
i
' N16 -
~
---r-----------------------_----------------------------------------------_-___
TntersectiQn:Sullivan & Narth (WB) Ramps Date:5ept, 5, 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriad Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: GB❑ XDther
Praject Nv.1995 ACTION CityfState:3-phase, wrPrice
;
__W~-~-------------------------~_~______-_____-___---------------------------
, ' CAPAGITY ANALYSIS WC]RKSHEE'I`
LANE GRC3UP 3 4 5 G 7 8 9
~-----Y----- Adjusted Ad.Sat Flow Ratio Green Ln.Grp y/C Crit.
- 1 2 Flow Rate F1w.Rt Ratio Capac. Ratia ?
_ Appr. Mvmt. v s VJs g/ C c,vph x Lane
' (vph) 4vPhg) 3/4 4x6 3/7 Grvup
E8
W8 J 330 - 4570 0.072 ~ {}.093 425 0.776
~
, NB C 2429 - 7006 0.347 - 0.860 6029 0.403 -
SB fl 2695 = 5152 0.523 - 0,698 3594 0.750
------------------------------------------------------__-------------__r------
~ Cycle Length= 85.Osec, Lost Time/Cyc1e,L= B.Dsec, S(v/s)ci= 0.595, Xc=0.656
T.ANE GRDUP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTa. = PERP+iTTD, = PRaTCTD & PERMTTI?]
c ^ J " O
V V
-----------------^_-...r---.a_.,------------,e-------e_-_.,s-sse-_a~--.,-f-.r-------
WILSEY & HAM , Be1leVUe, WAC , using NCAP hy PSI
N1T
I ~
I',w
Intersection:Sullivan & North (W'B) Ramps Date:Sept. 5, 1991
Analyst:LAJ TimePeriod Anlyzd:PM PEAK Area Type: CSD XOther
Project Na.1995 ACTION CitYlState:3-phase, w/Frice
LEVEL--OF-SERVICE WOFtKSHEET
First Term Delay Second Term Delay Tat.I3elay_&YLDS
LANE 3 4 5 fi 7 $ 9 1[} 11 12 13
GRa[]P vrc Greera Cycle Delay Lane Delay Prgrsn Lane Gp Ln Apgrch Apr
Rativ Ratio Length d1 Group d2 Factvr Ue],ay Gg Aelay LaS
1 2 X g{C C sec/veh Cap,c sec/veh PF sec/veh IAS sec/veh Tbl
Ap Mv {sec} (vph) T.9-13 (5+8)*9 9-1 9--1
*
EB 0.00
I----_
WB J 0.775 0.093 86.0 28.98 425 6.03 0.85 29.75 D 29.75 ❑
N8 C ❑.403 0.860 86.0 [].97 6029 0.43 0.85 $5 A 0.85 A
SS ❑ 0.750 0.698 85.0 6.25, 3594 0.64 0.85 5.87 S 5.87 a
I
---------------------------------__-_--------------------_----T-------------------
Intersection Delay 5.08 sec/veh, Xntersectivrr LOS B Table 9.1
LAuE GRDLTP DIAGRAMS-[*** = PROTCTp, = FERMTTD, ##I = PROTCTD & F"ERMTTD]
-----_---_------------------------;---------=--T-------------__--------_-l------
c " J ~ d
* * -
7k * *ik> * 'k ] i
v v
WILSEY & HAM , Bellevue, WA< , using NCAP ay PSI
=---------__R-----------------T--Y-------------
-
~
~
,
~
p
~
~
N18 -
-r a . 4 a,,.~ , •
. ~ } i, f~ • , x e ~
r_} ~ • . I-^' ~q' ~~'n'- _ ` y f • - ' ' _FN} r . ~
; n . ' a'y'.Sr~~-' ~ ' . ~ - , ' ' _ -j ~
A ' r?§Y ~q v aN i
~ ~ ~ _ . . ' ~k A'' v
~ ~ I~ - ~ - • -
. .
_ s l ' _ p ' 1~~ ` ~ ' y• ' _ ~ ~i _ -r
~T ' • - : i ~ r i '
~ • - " - ~ . r_ `y ~r.' ` ~ - ,
' ~ , , ` ~ ~s~' :~3' rti.. -f~~
~~t " M`
im
' . - - f ,ad ff ' i , . . v -Y ~ ~ ~ F~~ _ xt; •
=y ,y;i . . , _~;,~.k ~r,,~'•~ ' n.i?~
. 3~ ~u ti ,~I~ ~ . • Y~
. ~ i'~ M1i ' ~ ~ . ~ _ ~yn ~ --'~i•
~ ~I ~ . ~ f ~ h sy7 ~y _ 3~ ~i1.~~
_t. - f " F ' ` . 1 4 d'~'r ~ifi aa4i?,J+
. ` n . ky • - f - . . ~~~y~ 11ht • ` ~ L L 4 a 'r• k ~ , y
. _ ' 77 -
- i ' 'r =J'- ~ ~ _ ~ •r e€.lYiTerL
, i • ~ i ~ r'~1~~~. • I~ ~ . ~ ~ ' ' 1~" yK . _ -
y Fff ~ ~r~~ . . ~ • _ i • 1' el~.SN~~vi: • i
I 4~ ' _ _sYy'vf'' '
`~~u
e,3r. + r~~' zr.~ - - ' ~ ' , ' ~ ~ E~. "s,r7' . •1Ji+
. s..,Cr
^ , ' J rF'~.' L I~ _ -2 ~ - - ~ ~ S _ a _ n~~iy' ¢
~F~~~ •'~"l• ex~ ~=:y: t• ~
: ~ [ ~ ~ ~ ~ - • v - _ s# -Y F'~~ i.-~`i -
-=x-L « " x . . . ~ . . • - ` ' . . -i'..~<< 1 _ Y i
Sr fi - -r:stZV~.
14
• ' • - • . . - ~,~i1Y_1' ~r.1.• y?`4a e
~ r • ~o _
O
~ i _ va i . . ' S la1..•y~~ryF~ ~ti t f~
_ ~ _ y „ ~ r _ ~ ~ Y 3~' ~ ~ff'`~t5~ a~7~
~ ~S,i~"~F f r~; i
~ • q`~,Y. ,l 5 ~ . , ' ' . 1: 1~3.
; F . . % +1 • r ~ - _ ~ ~ i•F'n 7 ' .
T T~'" ~ - _ _ jr' . '
_ .ni '~,Vl"6 ~ ~ i • -1. ` .Si^r'~~lii ' YA~.
• - y j TA' ~r • ' J■J~ ~Ily I~~I,r • - • 1y4ef~
~
_ , "~Y' - , • _ ' ` ~3:,r+c'a'.
- - • .Th ~ • _ . ' - - . . ,y~ ,'~~d`~
' ~ 3 , _ ' • - - '~n • _fr~
'
r: ~ •-r~•' s ' - ~ . ~i
~ JF z J x ' S'rt'A'xv Fli
' ' i= n:g~.~~' ~i ~ - , . • - • _ , i~,',~'F', , '`~y~•`~{-~
FrY! , ~ L ' ~ ' . • . ri t ' ' ;t 3+ A
. • 1~ `~_~~Y~~ ~i~~~F.~ - . r , i _ y.. 4. ~.r;~
: .y~.
j I Ry, ~ ~ b~`~m a.~ 1
7 . ' ^ ~ ~ _ _ • _F .t~k'Tr .~ix:'n~
a ' 1'° .o-u ' • ' n - L
`
. • . v ` 't~ ' . ~ iµ.
, 1,~•~-d~ ~"C'i'
ti~. • , _ , - .
- :~•r~ . . - - ' "v rr. ''.t~
_ _ ~i y~la _ ~ ~ • . - y ' ' a
, - , _,l~~ ? _ - e , r " ..r sr , y • y'L~~ ~~a.V ~ _ - -
. r _ ` ~ - ~ - _ - , _ ~ - y~ . _ • . _ ~
AdaENDUM
FINAL
ENVIR4NMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT
A PROPdSED SHOPPING GENTER
. "VALLEY NfALL"
JAMES S. BLACK & COMPANY
July 1978
Lead Agency:
Spokane Caunty
Prepared by
HAWURTH AND ANDERSON, INC.
West 621 Mai lon Rvenue
5pokane, 4Jashingtvn
99201
vaLLEY rIALL
Fact Sheet
1. 5ite Lacation: Nmrtheast cvrner of the 7ntersectivn of Broadway and
Sullivan, in the Spokane Valley.
2. Site Area: 70 acrds.
3. Site Dwnership. James S. Black and Company+ {under option}
4. FacaTitaes to be con5tructed: aregionai shopping center with a maximurrc
of 830,000 square feet of building area, if and when fuZTy deveZoped.
The mall complex is planned tv cantain 5pace far three to fiVe FI'1d,]fll^
department stores with apotential of 525,000 square feet of floar space,
plus adaitional space for mall shops contaaning an area of 235,000
square feet. In additaan, there wouid be ten free standing structures
on the periphery of the site for addition of cvmmercial and vffice space.
These structures will contain fram 110,[]00 tv 747,000 square feet of
buiTding area.
5. Gross Leasabl e Shapping Area: A maximum of 760,000 square feet. Initial
- develppment to be appraximateiy 500,(]00 square teet.
6. Dff-street Parking Provided: 4,570 spaces.
7. Parking Ratia: 5,5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross 6uiiding area.
8, Building Area: 830,000 square feet.
9. Landscaped Rrea: 487,200 square feet _
30. Area cavereci by paving arad/or structures: 2,504,750 square feet.
11. Gonstruction Phasing: Initial deve]opments are prajected to begin in
1982 vr 1983 with compZetion of the inatial phase in 1985 or 1986.
12. Estimated PopuZativn Serviced:
(a) Valiey: 8$,900
(b) Primary: 312:800
{c} 5econdary: 224,300
13. P9ajor arteriai servicing the area and existing traffac volumes:
Interstate 90 west of Sullivan 23,300; east of Sul l i van 17,600,
Suliivan Road 11,300
8raadway west of Sullivan 3,200; east of 5ullivan 1,800
Sprague west of Su1 livan 12, 550; east of Sut 1 ivarr 11,85(]
Mfssion, 1,700
Estimated `fraffic Generated:
Average Weekday trips - 27,100
Peak Weekda,y hour flvw - 2,710
Average Saturday trips - 33,900
e
74. Available income to 4e spent within primary, secondary and tertiary
trade areas;
(a) Vailey: $4,644
(b) Primary: $4,704
(c) 5econdary: $4,789
15. Utilities serued by:
(a) Water: Vera Water and Pawer District
(b) Electricity: Vera 4Jater and Pawer District
(c) P#atural Gas: The Washingtan Water Pawer Company
{d} Telephone: Pacific Narthwest Beil Telephone Campany ~
(e) 5o]id Waste: Valley Garbage 5eruice
(f) 5etivage: On-5ite via county approved treatment piant.
16. Capies of the Final EI5 are avaie1a61e fnr the cvst af reprvduction.
17. Date of i ssue of the Fi nal E TS i sJu7 y 31, 1978.
INTRODUCTFON
This document presents the completed fanal environmental impact state-
ment for the proposed Valley Mall Sh❑pping Center. It includes the totality
of the previvusTy publashed Draft Environmental Impact 5tatement, a]ong
wzth responses and comments received during the draft review process.
The purpose of a Draft €nvironmental Impact Statement, as set fvrth
in the 5tate Environmenta7 Policy Act (SEPA) Guidelines {WAC 197i10-405},
was ta transmit infarmativn cvncerning a proposed governmenta7 actian and
the aTternatives to that activn, to public officials, project spvnsars and
interested citizens. A principle function ta be served by the draft review
, is to fac7litate the transmittal tv the lead agency, frvm other governmental
agencfes and interested citzzens, of substantive information cvncernzng
the prvbable adverse enviranmentai impacts whlch may have been discussed
inadequately or erroneously in the Draft EIS. The review process aZso
pravidei an oppartumzty for reviewers t❑ bring ta the attention of the
iead agency any iSSue of pvtential environmental cvncern whfch should be
explored by that agency privr ta the issuance of this Final Environmental
Impact 5tatement.
The materials presented in this daCUment represent the products of
the Draft Environmental Impact Stat2ment review pracess. Additions con-
tained herein are additiona] comments by the Zead agency, comnents by the
reviewers of the Draft EIS, responses to those comnents by the Zead agency
(see Addendurn, Fina1 EIS Comment5 and Respanses), and a summary of the
contents of the Final EIS. 7he format of this dvcument follmws that
prescri6ed in the SEPA Guidelines (WAC 191-10-580).
This Final Enviranmentai Impact Statement was prepared by Hawvrth and
Andersan under the supervisian of the Caunty of Spokane as the lead agency.
Mr. Fred aayharsh is the responsible afficial. C❑mment5, informativn, and
questivns were addressed to Mr. Tom Masher at the Spakane County Planning
Department, Narth 811 Jeffersvn, Spvkane, WA 99201 ar (509) 456-2274. 5pokane
County had the assastance of the consulting firm of Haworth and Anderson, Tnc.,
West 621 Mallvn Avenue, Spakane, Washington, Backgrvund data in support of
this document may be found at both ❑ffices of the Tead ageney and with
Haworth and Anderson, Inc. The offiGial date of issue of the Fina7 Envaron-
menta] Impact Statement is July 31, 1978.
The circuiativn of this decument is prescribed in the SEPA Guidelines
(WAC 197-10-600) which d7rects that the Final EI5 must go to "the depart-
ment of ecolagy, Office of the Governor ar the Governor'S designee, the
EColQgZCal Cof[A131551Un, the Iead agency's SEPA Puhlic Infa rnatian Center,
agencies with jurisdictian, and federal agencies with jurisdictian, which
received the Draft ETS. The Fina1 EI5 shail be made available to the pub-
lic in the same manner and cost as the Draft EIS".
~
TABLE 4F CONTEFJTS
I NTRODUCT TON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . i
LIST OF TABLES AND CNARTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
LI 5T 0 F MAP5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . , v
QIS7RTBUTYQhI LIST . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi
5l!14P9ARY OF TNE COhITENT'S UF THE FI'NAI. EI'S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i
IMPACT SUAiMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Description af the Propasal. , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Existing Environmental Cvnditivns. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Zhe impact of the Prvposai orr the Envi ronment. . . . . . . , . . 71
The Relatianship Between Local Shart-term U5e5 of Man's
Environment and Maintenance and Enhancement ❑f Long-
term Productavityo . . , . . . . . . . . 14
Irreversib7e and/ar Irretrievable'Commitm~ntsoi ~esources . . . . 16
Adverse Envirorrmenta7 Impacts ldhich P9ay Be Mitigated 17
AT ternatives to the Propasal o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 ~
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 20
Qther Issues . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Citatians. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
AWPENDIX A: CATEGORICAL IMPACT AFdALYSIS. . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . 32
A. Elenents of tFre Physical Environment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
1. Ea rth . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2. Rir . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3, Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4. Flara . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
5. Fauna . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
6. Noise. . . . . . o , , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
7. Light andGlare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 ~
8. La nd Use . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
9. Natvrai Resvurces.. . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 64
10. Risk vf ExpZ nsian ar Hazardnus F~i ssior~s 64
8. Eiements of the Human Envar•onment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
1. Pvpul ation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
2. Housi ng. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
3. Transpartatian1Circulatian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4. Puhi ic Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
5, Energy , . . . q e . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 91
6. fJtilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
7. Huma n Hea] th . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
8. Aesthetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . 98
9. Recreation . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . 39
ia. RrchaevTogical/Histari cal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .100
Citatiflns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , .101
zi
APPENDIX 8 - SHOPPING CENTER STATISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .104
APPENDIX C - RIR QUALITY MQNITORINC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1i3
' .APPENDIx a - CARBaN MaNDxItiE IPfiRACT - ROLLBACK ANALYSIS . . . . . . . .141
APPENDIX E - VALLEY M4LL IMPACT 0N CBD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Z49
APPENDIX F - VALLEY MALL IMPRCT DN VALLEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .166
APPENDIX G - TRRFFTC ANALY5T5 AND RECQMMENDA7IDNS . . . . . . . . . . .Z74
APPENDIX H - ExPANDED GROUND WRTER REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .196
ADDENDUM FINRL EI5 COMMENTS AND RESPQNSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .241
ADDENDUM FINRL Ei5 ARDFTIONAL COP9MENT5 FROM THE LEAD AGEHCY . . . . . .27Z
~
.
~i~
LIST DF TABLES AtdO CNARTS
InZand Empire Ecan❑mic Charactertstics . , . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . 23
5polcane County SMSA Ecanomie Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5pvkane Cvunty Ma,jor Retail Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
City of Spokane EcDnamic Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . 26
SeasvnaT 1lariations in Carbon rlnnaxide Violatians. . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Carbon Mvnoxide <<lonitoring Result5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . 38
Projected CO Concentrat7 vns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Chemical Ana1ysis of Water . . . . . , . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . , 49
Exi sti ng Na i se LeveZ s dBA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
General Characteristics af the PopuTatavn - Spakane Cvunty 5E15R 1914 66
Nistvrical, Current, and Projected Papulation Leveis - Spokane County. . 70
Cnaracteristics of Housing - 5e7ected Census Tracts. . . . . . . . . . . 73
€tegional Shapping Center hourTy Traffic F]ow Rates . . . . . . . . . . . 81
iv
LIsr aF. MAPs
v; c; n; ty Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s
area Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Site Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Inland Empire Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Area 5happina Cerrters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Topography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
~ Land lJse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 •
Land CJse Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Area Zoni ng . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Geographi ca] Sectvrs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
Census Tracts in the Spokane SMSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
Cerisus Tracts in the Proj ect Vi ci nity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
Area Transpvrtation Network and Average Daily Traffic Caunts 76
Average@aily 7raffic Prajected and Percentage Change 80
v
DISTRTBUTION LIST - FTNAL EI5
State Department of Ecotogy, Eastern Regional Dfface, Spokane
State flepartment of Ecology, Qlympia C217
5tate Department vf NaturaT Resources
Department 4f Social ana Health Services
Spokane County Health District
Spokane County Azr Pollutian Contral Rutharity
Spokane County Lfbrary District (3)
-
Central Ualley Schov7 tiistrict
Vera bJater and Power
. Va7 7 ey Chamber af Comrnerce
5pokane Chamher of Corrmerce
Fire District No. 1
Spokane County 6oard af Cummissivners (3)
Spokane County Planning Carnmis5ion (7)
Spokane Couraty Park Departmerrt
Spokane Caunty Engineers Office
Spokane County 6uiTding Department .
Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney
Department vf Cvmrnerce and Ecanomic Development
Wash3ngtvn kfater Power Company
Pacific Narthwest Be71
Spokane Regi onal Rl anning Conference
Was hi ngtvn State department uf Game Spokane Area Develvpment CounciT
Spokane Caun~y 5heriff's Department
~]ame5 5, Black and Campany(5)
Spokane County P1 anning Department (15)
Vaiiey Garhage ServiGe
City Cvuncil, City of Spokane (fo)
Kootenai County PTanning Department
Eastern Washington Neal th Systems Rgenc,y
Di ck Gentry, Spokane Dai 1y Chran i cle
John Kaferatzis, 5pnkesman-Rev3ew Chuck Potter, Spokane Corrmunity Press
Jini Waveda, Valley Herald
Statian Super7rttendent, U. S. Posta7 Service, Opportunity 5tation
State Department of Transportation, Spokane Office
5tate Department af Trarisportation, Olympia
vi
' SUMMARY OF TNE CDNTENTS aF THE FINAL EIS
Propased Action
The propased action is for approval by Spakane Cnunty of a zone change
_ fram Agricultural ta Comunercial and the subsequent development of a regional
shappirig center. The action as propased by James S. BTack and Company of
Spokane, Washington. The praposed shopping center wili be lacated vn a 70-
acre parcei at the nartheast cflrner of 5uilivan and Broadway in the Spakane
Va1ley. The develvpment wiTl eonsist of a eentral mall area wxth major
departrnent stores and malT shops cantaining appraximately 750,000 square feet
of grvss leasable flaor area. In additian to the mall area, ten free 5tanding
' structures with 110,000 to 147,000 square feet of grvss 7easable flovr area
are prQpased for the eastern and sauthwestern peripheries of the site.
Probahie Impacts
Earth
-Disruption, displacement, compactivn and avercouering of approxTmately
2.5 mTT]ion square feet of sail
-Paae fl r❑vertiui]d 80 perGent of site
-Minar alteration of topvgraphical contour
Air
-Temporary dust and particuTates during construction phase
-S7ight increase in emissivns from heating and air canditivning
systems
-Tncrease in traffie related emi5sians including car6on monoxide and
suspended particulates
Water
-Apprmxi m~tel,y °two mi1 Z a on square feet of impervi ous surfaces wi 11 be
created on-site
-Prvject water cansumpti an of approximate7y 18 mi 11 i nn ga7lvns annually
-Potential injectian of effluent frorn storm water and sewage treatment
plant into aquifer
Flvra
-Camplete removal of existing flora
-Appraximately 500,000 feet of newly landscaped area
Fauna
-Decrease i n number and da versity of speci es
-Disruptiorr and remova7 of wildiife habitat
1
~
Na;se
-Temporary increase in ambient leveis during construction
-Increase in traffic notse vn area streets
-Increase in noi se 7 evel s from an-s~ te
Light and Gi are
-h1ew Z i ght saurces created
Land fJse
-Z4ne change from Agricullture to Commercial
-Interface of carrmerci al and resi denti al uses
-Patentaal inducement for rnore antensive Tand uses an adjacent properties
NaturaT ReSOurces
-N/A
R15k of Explosion vr Ffazardaus Emissions
-HfPI
Papulatian
-Increase in empToyment 6ase
-Potential increase in papu3ation in s;te vicinity
Flvusi nq
-Potentia7 growth i n housing demand and canstruction near propased
project
TranSaortationlCirculatian -Generativn af approximateTy 27,000 vehicuTar trips per peak weekday
~ -Cvntribute to need for widening of SuTlivan, Broadway and the Sullivan
I-90 averpass
-Provide parking for 4,57,0 vehicles
-Increase in traffic cangestion and accident potential
publi c Servi ces
s I ncrease i n demand fiar fi re and police protectz vn SeT'V1 Ce5
-Patential increase in schov7 district enra7lment as indirect resuit
of pro,ject
-Increase raadway system maintenance costs
Enerq,y
-Cnnsumpti vn vf estimated 54 mi lTian kwh annua 1ly
-Direct and indirect consvmpti on of energy for space heating, air
condf ti aning , a i ghti ng and trans pvrtati on
i
1
. 2
I~
EJti1 i ti es
-Increase in utality service requirements
-l7n-si te water consumption estimated at appraximately 18 mi T l ian
gai Ivns annually
-Generatian of abaut 13 mi 17ion gal lons of waste water anrrual Ty -
-Generation vf snlid waste
Numan }fealth
-Increase in vehicular and pedestrian accident patential
Resthetics -
-Ghange frnm open field to landscaped shopping and affice ma7l complex
Recreation
-Cvmrrerci al recreati nnaT faci Z i ti es provi ded
- Archaeological/Historica1
_N/A
Ai ternati ves
No Acti vn
-Site would remain temporariZy undisturbed
-AlZows subsequent use wath pvtentially differen.t enrrironmentai impacts
-AZ 1 a►vs subsequent pi ecemeal dev~~ opment
-Ai1aws subsequent comprehensive development by a different property
owner or developer
Aiternative 5ite Lvcativns
-No appli cant ownership vr contral of ather viable si tes whi ch meet
deveTaper's needs at thas time
-Pose different enviranmental impacts if the physical characteristics
of an alternative site are different or zf the surrvunding neighborhood
candit7ons are dzfferent
Alterna ti ve Fac ili t.y ties igns
-F1exibility in design allows incorporatian of environmentally sensitive
aesign features including mitigating measures nat presently part vf
the project design
SmaaTer 5cale Development on Same 5ite
-Decrease in environmental impacts on adjacent lana uses
-May not attract tenants necessary fvr i ts support 3
.
Ma t~ qat~ rrq Measures
Ea rth ~
-Adequate site planning and deveivpmental programnang
-Landscaping of area not C4V@}"E~ by s tructures vr pavi ng
Ai r -
#
-Measures ta reduce dust'generated by constructivn activities
-Implementation of raadway system impravements to reduce trafffc con;
gesti on areas '
-Potential implementation and enforcement of stricter Federal automo-
bile emi551i7n standards
~
4dater
-Starm water dispvsal system
-tlse of semi -pervi ous pa+ri ng materi a 1
-Use of ❑i1 and grease separators ~
-Fallowirtg guideianes prvmuTgAted by "20$" study fvr minimizing paten-
tia7 far graund water degradatian
Noise
I
-Lamiting construction activity ta narrnal warking h4urs ,
-Designi ng use 1 acati ons and ci rcuZ ati on so °that evening traff i c i s
directed away from ad,jacent residential land uses
-flse of earth berming and Tandscaping along commerciaT-residential
interface
Liqht and G1 are 4
-Design to minimaze emissians of light and glare off-site
Land Use
-Implementation of mrttigating measures to reduce patential conflict of 4
cammerciaT-resadential interface
-Estab7ishment of guidelines tv cantrol growth-inducing impacts of the
proposed proj ect, espec3 ally adj acent 1 and uses
Lop ul ati an / Huusi nq
-Planning and land use contrvls fn areas of induced growth 4
Transpvrtati anlCi rcu] ati on
-Improve and expand existing 5treet system
-Encourage use of mass transit ~
~
4
II
Public 5ervices
-Yncrea5ed tax revenues
-8uiTding design features that reduce potentiaT need for polfce and
fire pratectian services
_ Enerqy
-Lltilizatinn of energy ef'f'icient design features
UtllZti25
-Early arrd cZose cvordinatiorr between project spvnsvr5 and affected
utilitie5
-Recyc] ing nf wastes
Resthetics
-5ite design and la,yout to screen residentTal uses fram vehicular
parking and circulation
Unavaidable Rduerse Impacts
Ea rth
-Disruptivns of sQil vn praject site
-Constructiorr af impervious surface aver 80 percent of prvject site
Air
-LfncontrolTa4le dust from construction activities
- Increased emi ssi ons fram veh i cu7 ar traffi c
Water "
-A1 terati on ef surface water absorpti on eharacteri stics
-Patential for percalation of cvntaminants anta ground water
F3ora
-C1 earing of +exi5ti ng f1 ora from site
Fa una
-Permanent disrupt3 on of wi1dli fe habi tat
Noise
-Increase in amhient noise Teve7S during canstruction phase
-increase in traff» generated noise Zeve7s during aperatiana7 phase
l.and fJse
-Potential intensive land use on adjacent praperties
-Interface between cammercial and residential land uses
`
5
I ~
Transpvrtati onlCircu1 atinn
-Generation af additional traffic aver existing roadway system ~
-Contribute to need for raadway sy5tem improvements
Publ-i c Servi ces
-Increase police arad frtre protection service needs ~
-IncreaSed ti€ne and resaurce demands on lacal governmentaZ and planning
agencies i
-Indirect demands on recreational and schoal facilities resu7tfng frvm
patentia7 growth inducing aspects vf proposal
Enerqy ~
-Di rect and a ndi rect increase i n energy cansumptian for space heati ng a
air coraditioning, lighting, and transpvrtation
llti3itles
-Increased demand for uti li ty servi ce requi rements . i
I
!
1
~
,
~
6
1
a
i ApPENarx E
VRLLEY MALL IMPRCT
L1N C6p
Prepared by
Research Econamics
245 Spakane Falls Blvd.
Spvkane, Washi ngton
99201
149
. i
f--~
y
c
reSear+Ch
e{:~~~mi(.'I ~
I
June 14, 197$
'Ir. Harry Newman, ,Tr.
President
Newman Properti-es
'a;l? LQng Beach Bculevard ~
~ Lang Beach, Califarnia 9{]80e'
Dear !Ir. Vewman:
'''he ateacher3 analysis reveaIs (1) 5hopper; Goods sales trends 4-n SAOicar,e's
Central Business Distri.ct between 1962-1976, anri (21) "he farecast ir.Dact a` ~
Vallev Mall on such rierwxatowrz sa, es jLn the 1980-I990 periaci. E:pa
sparked a dramatic reverrsal, in the heretafare dez}.Jniag sharz vf E'iSA
Shopaers Gaods sa? es taxzng place ira d,au-ntaGrn Snvkane. Tedav -;ajvr C3n
rztailers are enliaysng healthy'sales valumes. aur sales projections snow
t'~a= ~'a-le; :~(al3's annual real sales imvact nn downto~ar~ deA3[t=E:lt st::res ~
wouid rar.ge fr~am $23 to $~iO rt' 1icn ~.;c v:ae I980-1990 perzvd: overall reaZ
sa? es ;:aDae4s cn al'. CSD 5h¢3ppe1^5 Gnods sales woulc range =rcm 523 tc S39
mi.? i lon AEY <<93r.
Despite these sales penetratian =agn-[-ades, ':aZley ,Fall's ac[«al econvrnie '
iWraet Taill not be extensice. PrpjeCte1 grt7G,'Lh 4 n unsatisfied sales poten-ial ~
thrvughout Spoka:ae C^unty heavily vuersnadows the above coaapetitive =_-range-
rienys especisiiy in rhe srea Qf nvr.-devartr-ent szore sales o_.~ SClCT]nErS
r-oads. `•IQrec=ier, papulation growth in Kovtena:~ County (near?-r 50,000), a
~ ve.,~: 4w~orCart sr~u:ce o~ p~;trDnage for the Mall, is _"orecasL 7a iaerease 2--
3 ti~!es faste, tnan that pra;ected far Spokane vouaxt•• in tne 1?70-198= per-
~od, Also, dowmtown 5oo€cane departmer.t, stores -whwch establish new vranch ~
steres in tne suburbs will essentiaZZy neutralize the ecanomic .Lra~act af
:'allev Ma1l on their CBD aperativns.
5zncerely,
~ .
r--
David T. Eacret
Ca -m
~ 150
~
dr, dovid t, eaeret. presfdrant - 245 spakariv folfr blVd. spokcsne. woshington 99,201 - 509 • 747 9123
. ~
Impact on Downtown Retailers
af Valley `iall
~
~
}
}
t
~
~
f -
nrep3r2d ft7r:
:cEL+lMA-N F'F.OpE&TIaS
LONG BP-AC14, CAT-IF4~NTIA
Revision
june, 1978
~
~
6
Y
~
i
i
~
~ 151
research scortomicr
~
~
; I
~ I
~
4 TAtLE OF CONI`iE,:TS
1
}
?age Nu:rber
. ~
Introduction
~
s - Historical Trends 3 ~
' ►'ailey `a11 Imaact 10
i
~
~
g
; . 1
~
~
;
t _
9 ~
~
9
F ~
F
9
1
l
f ~
1
~
E ~
~
r
r ~
~ I
k
i
a
' 152 `
teSeafCh eCortcr i'',icI
i
]i
E
aNTRaDUCTIaN
_f
~
~ Newman °roperties has requested that Research Ecanomics estinate the sales
i:aDact on dQwntewrn 5ookane retai?ers af deveZapinn a re;iona}, shoDowng
i center in the Spakane Valley. '"his oraposed Cenfier, hereafter referred
, to as Valley Ma11, wauld contain apprfl:ciaaately 875,040 square £eet af ;ross
buildin~; area and ae locates~ in tEze 5pokane Va11ey at the intersection of
I-90 and 5ullivan Rcaad about nine miles east at the Centra3. 8usiness
District (CBD). The cenLer would contain three to five anchar departm.ent
; s[ares and roughly 235,000 square feet of mall shops.
~
This study is li miCed in scope. Only the econamic impaCC af Va? lev Ma? l
on Cn;7 retail Shoppers Goads sa1es is etraluated.lf Cnnvenience gaods sales
~ (ycod, drug, hardware, and Variety stares} are eYClesded because ti°!ey are
; heacrily r3ependent uacn the nearness oi poteaef.al customers t❑ this tyae o`
retaii cutl.et, i?tlner dvwntown econar±ic impacts cuch as emplovmer.t, nersonal
income and future growth also wi11 not be consicered 4-za this analvsis.
~
The analytical wethedolagy is straiGhtfarward. The ecanamic imract o^ CBJ
I retai3.ers ~f Vaiiey Mals will 6e shocan b•r ca-mparing normal, ruture CBn sales
~ trends with thase impacted 6y a aew regiortal sh~gaing center. The dirferer.ce
f ia retail saZes valuraes is an approximation of Valley MaII's impact an dcw-,i-
i town retazl sales.
~ ?u:chasing pvwer within a retai.l erade area is nat ereated by ne•a vr exist-
~ ing xetail outlets. Rather, it is created thrQugh: (1) incone of the -
~ existing population, and (2) income accam~an~ing new populatian grawth.
~ That is, Valley :.al~. will no[ create new pu~rchasfng pawer; it Eaill, however,
~ cause a redistribution af area retail ex;oenditures. The speci.~ic issue to
' be addressad here is the magnitude of tPais sales redistribution away =rom
J ~ the 5nokane CBD,
= Estimating the impact ❑f Valley Mall on dawntown comoariscn ;cads sales has
~ been a dif:icult prncess because af data limitations. Secondary retaii
; I-rade data is limieed, ir.eonsisteat and aften nars-comgarable; nrzmar❑ data
• ,n retail sales are prvprietar3, therafare, clcrsely he1.d. Neverthe? ess, we
s
haue been ab1.e to piece eageeher enough information to make reaZist#.c impac:
estinates. These estimates take into account the secuZar decline in down-
~ towrr 5pcalcane's share ai €netropolisan area sales befare the 1974 World's xair:
~ as well as post-Expa 34 tren.ds. .
~ -
#
~ 11 Snnpoers Goods are definer3 as General Merchdndise (includes dapartL.ent
stare doods), APPara3, Furniture/nppliances.
~
' -
~
~
~
i 153
re5eCZfCh G'C~~omiC!
' Table I
I
ToT~~ ~AXABT E RETAI-L SaLLS
Spakane, Washingtvn •
(Mi11ionS Of LolIars)
1'973 1974 1575 I976 '
Gurrent I7aliars:
Swkane SMSA S1,084.5 51,358.4 $1,348.2 S? 522.7
City Qf Sgvk4ne 821.3 992.6 9-03.2 1,09' .8
Car.stant i975 TDallars:
SpQkane uiv1SA 1,311.4 1,4$3.6 1,348.2 1,453.0
Ci:y of Spokane a93.1 ~,083.6 993.2 1,041.8
C itv Share 75.7% 73.1~'/ 73. r% i 1 7 . ~
Source: Reseu:Gh Economics and 5-ZZ Gompilatzons
~
~
i
; I
a
r
e
I
~ 154 re$eafch econQmiaJ
~ -
HISTORICAL TRENDS
;
` Past sa3es trenas of Shoppers Goods orovidz the basis far ~easuri~g the
natential econoric impact ❑f Valley :•Ia11 an dau-ntoxm Spakane retaalers.
ihese trends will be analyzed in this sectivn.2l
A modesc shrinkage vecurred in the share of total cauntv retail sales actu-
, aily takina place within the CzCy of 5pokane between 1973 and 1976. Table
1 shaws Chat 75.7 percent of alI retail sales in the Spakane SMSA cater-
minous with Spokane County took place within the city in 1971 compared
Ca 71.7 percent in 1976. Na post=1972 data exist which break out GBD reCail
sales Lrvm thmsz in the remaindex of the City o'L Spokane.
A heaithy growth in toCal retail sales occurred throughaut the S~okane c~TCA .
in the 1973 -1976 ceriQd (Table 1). Currznt da11ar saIes increased a[ a
11.9 cercent aE=erage annualyrate in the 1973-76 period campared to a 10.0
perceat rate in the Cxty; in terms nf CbnStant vurchasing oower, the averace
rate per vear,o'r such sales inereases was 6.8 percent in the Caunty and 4.$
percent in the Cicy. Retail sales in the City af 5pokane exceeded ane
, b±l'_zon dollars for the first time ir. 1976.
Tatal setail salas actzvi`y, hcwever, is a cer5_,crude indicator af 5hoopers
Goods saZes. 5happezs Goods sales comarise on3y about ZE percent of totai
retaii valume in the 5nokane SMSA. Since Vallel Ma31 wilI imvacC Shoppers
Goods sales, this analysis wiTl focus an [his Cype of retaiT activitv.
Dowatown Spokate's market share of countv-wide ShcnUers Goods sa3es eroded
between 1963 and 1972.11 Tye data greserted in Table 2 result fram, censuses
' oi husiness taken at five-vear fnterva3s bv the G.S. Ceasus Bureau. Between
1-963 and 1972, rea1 custnmer espenditures °or Spckaae area Shcopers Goods
~nrcreased at average annual rates pi 4.7 perCent throughcut the SMSA anQ
3.5 percent in the C4ty; they decline-d at a0.? percen[ rate in the CED.
ReaI sales at generaI mercnandise stores (raairely degartment stores) and
apnarel stores zn 5pakane's CED decLzned between 1953 and I972; vnl•: real
sa?es =n dawnta-cn furriturelaPpliance stores ir.creased dur4mg th?s per4cd.
Average annual rates of decline in real sales durzng these niae vears sar
z
s
21 ylast daea trends in this study are expressed i.n 1975 da3lars. See Apben-
r dix Afor infor-mativn re,gardina, Converting 1915 doIlars sales into csrrent
dallars.
3 ?j Shovpers Goods are essentially eauivalent to Corsparison Goods a gen-
; ~ cra'L categorv ean-ar,only denating the type ❑f zraads sald in shopniag
# centers. iiae diYfere*tce is that SiC cade 591- (!tiscellanevus 5noppirto
; Goads) are not included in 5nappers Graods sales. 'he Shoppers Goods
tC7C2? S ShC`n;Y1 IIl T3brt e 2 COiT,lpI"iSE 2bOur 91 pe2'Callt Df rdwal CpC:DG: Z5a:; GLioG35.
-3-
k
~ 155
i
1
1 ~
F re5earci i ec'q
VnDI 1 iicf
•rRi.ND:ry 114 sii0iri1HIS 0.0003 isY Aj;Ln
, Spo}:aiir, Wasliincatsaei
~I`hnu5,nscls nf Dollar5]
~7n4_f,[~i~ SA~I,i'1_.,-.__..• l~_~f :,jMZl:~~na? ----_____~~'i~1:~snc: C:151?-
t972 1967 1963 1972 19117 1`)fi3 1972 1967 I9fi:i
CLdCY'i?lll lf[il,.ik:;; -
$123,628 $ 93,2c,~ ~64,547 $ iaz,2G6 w 74,e16 $ ai, 129 543,071 $ 39 ,ri0 $ss,s>>
Iit f3t.:tlori:s 114.553 78,941 48,f13G 92,9f,7 64,24 1 43,227" 38.7Fi4g 3C" 8I10 31,722 ~
~
~ ApI•-rir-i 28,17I 11,131 1 li,€136 23,1192 15,931 19,772 10,E05 0,5116 10,955
1 isin/etsli~ ikc.ca~, 38,051 ~24 a735 _1'_!, 189 ~30,481 _1I,837 _ l~1.`3;3 ]~l4b5 _a,8 dq G,$Io
~ 'I'«t.il:, ~ Slf7g , [150 $135,7 171 5!17,7G7 S155.i339 S1A8,584 $ 85,299 $67,581 557,115 553,60lD
'f
~ ipt1:;[ ini 1'TIb 1?r~ll,irr;•
f;s•n'4 N1i n-t I.ti radis o SI49,670 $1S•1,:1i9 S100,228 $123,809 $ i[]7,R0•9 $ t`ski,717 552,l.44 551,219 S55,G75
C1t:pC.:~rniCS 133,841 113,7;~G 75,832 112,551 92,5GEi 67,123 46,93[} i3,1+11 49~25B
,~.~,~~,i►a:! 34,105 251 I'J 29,90i] 27,956 22,955 22,938 12,234 13,1112 17,011
i'i~rty/A~~~~li.~~irr•s _4G,067 _35,f4 1 _2f,ifi9 3 36,902 _15,7111 _7i1,_734 17.439 il,12/ _1qlGC5Ei
M229,$92 $lJS,E;ry9 $i.`-1 I ,811 $lfia,Gfi7 ;.IriFi, 4fz() $132 .389 $81 ,$]7 V12 ~298 $83,354
.,,~ni. . II . ~ ~•i,~,u•: .si~~l 4i~•:,~±.frc•!a ~.i [1l3f1i1111;:.
dh AL
general merchandise, denartment, anQ aCnarel stares were 0.7, 0.5, snd 3.6
percent, respectiveZy; downtowct iurniturelanpliance stores real sales,
however, increased at a very strong 5.6 percenC rate. -
The share of total SMSA 5happers Goods sales (1915 dollars) taki~- ;)lac2
outside the Sookane city Iimits and in Spvkane County increased slightlv
oetiaeeTi 1963 and 1972 (Table Z). This is reflected in tye higher 4.7 ver-
eent ar.nual rate ef growth in these salescampared t❑ a4.I gerce^t ;^crease
, within the City ❑f 5pokane. The relatively slvwer Cit-i growth raLE mastis
the fact that downtown sales deciines (1975 dollars) had tv be ofrset by
a rapid growth in sales in suburban areas af the City autside the CBD.
Real sales of decantowm Spakane`s five department stores strongly increased
in the 1972-I975 periad, whiIe these in the sever department stares
autside the C3D have acruaLly deciined raderately Rerzrrira"Co iable 3
and Chart 1, the increase in real sales in downtv«n Spakane increased at a
6.4 gercent averane a:.rual rate bet*Heen 1972 and 1976. In cantrast, or.ce
CBD department sales are subtractea fro-m those ❑ccurring in the total 5ac-
kane 5MA, it can be seen that sales autside the CBD aetualiv decIinsd at
a 2.4 percent in 1912 ta 46.0 percent ia 1976. r
A sur.ma.rizatian cr 196y-I976 retail sales trends involving the Spokaze CBD
fol3ows: -
-Between 1973 and 1976, tatal retail sales grawth ia the Spckane
suburban areas outside the Ciey increased slightly Faster than
corresponding sales withzn [he City. Na aggregate data are
available ehat break aut total retail sales aceivitv for the C5D
since ehe 1972 census was taken, ~
FoCusing dow-n to ShoApers Goods sales, downtown Spakaae's szare
of such County-wide sales erode4 aa the I963-1972 period; in
fact, real sales of aIw classes ❑f CBD Slioppers Goods e::ceot
furnmture/agpliances actually deClined-between 1963 and I91,.
M4reovera'the share ❑f totaI 5M5A 5hopners Goaaa sales taking
place in suourQaa Ccuntv areas zncreased sligntly during this
perimc; this -was at the exaense of City salzs.
, Downtawa departmenC store sales, a wa-jor componen[ af ShQpaers
_ Gaods sales, rebaunded sharply between 1972 and 1976. ih=_s
taok place at the expense of 5pakane suburban department sto_res.
r'• -
. 41 Apparently the U.S. Census sup?le=ented tnzs 12-stare caunt Dy adding
~ tne J.J. Newberr-r in the CBD aad tne J.J. Newnerrv ;n Sitadle Cpncer
- t.rariet;:-[ype stares t❑ arr4ve at a tatal I976 eau::t af I4 ceo3rtmE.-s=
~ stares in the SAakane 5IM5ri. See Ypoendi rB ior a locationaZ _nver_rvr--
oir Spokane-area dapartment stores.
,
- S-
; 157
rLSG'L?fCh uCQRcm!c.
:N
,
Table 3 !
SPOKKANL SMSA AINTE) DC7%Vi\''~OIA'N D;FAM-4EVT S.TUPE SALW~ 71RE-~77-%~Z
(1972-1976)
1972 I973 1974 1975 . = ~
Dept. Stare Sa3es ($400)--
Spokane SMSA
Gurent Dvllars 8I02,946 $110.736 $124,II3 $126,585 S ? :5 , 0~ ~
Canstant 1375 Dallars 124.632 129,667 132,741 125.585 130 , W;-;O ~
No. vf Dent. S'Lores I5 15 15 14 J. i
Dapi. °toI'e ua1eS (SOaO)
Spokane CHD
Current Dollars 38, 7F4-1/ 62,
;r~Q ~
Gcnstant 1975 Dvllars 46,930 - - - 6 C 8
Na. of Dept. S tore s 5
ESti;T1atBC a: 7pEPCeil$ 1F1Ci Ea52 C7V8r 1975
21 Esti.rnated i
,
Saurce: U.S. Census and Rasearch Ecvnamics
/
158
M
, researcti ecnremi: i
cr_art i
SFiAR--- OF SPOKANE SNISA
DEPARTMEV?' STORE SaLES BY LCCATION
1972
//0,*
CBD
Outsidz 7~~
C8D ~
02.3%
1976 •
CBD
' OutsiCe 46.00/= .
CBD
54.0%
Source: 'Researc': Ecor_omic_
159 resenrch e-cO(1CTctC:
i ~
t
C
5e=reral pos tulat es can be set f crth 'oased uDon these tren,;s. '£-ney a rc:
~
The share of ather ~otal S:fSA ShQpper Goods sales ta'-;zng place 1
in downCawn Spakane~(other thar_ thQSe at departnent stores)
aisa prebablu increised stran-Ir betwee^ 1972-1975. Tais 4-s
hich3.y li:{ely be+aLSa thes-a "other" SnonDers Goods arz ver-:
similar in t*rpe to those fcund i.n depart^ert stores.
ihe prine reason fo'r this drauatic reversal taas alrost cer- ~
tainYy the catalytic zzipact Expp 1174 in pushin; tc relLl"-
enate the Spak.ane central business district.
Fram a1.1 ❑utaard aupearances, this resurgence ;n down[okxn
ecnnomic aetivity and accc*.avanying reversal in the share Q* ~
total Shoppers Goods sales slippin.- to t?ie suburbs 4--s --an-
tinuing. '
i
I
I ~
I~ -
~
I
I
i
i
~ .
I
,
~
~
~
i
~
i
i ~
~
' 160
~
fc-Serryt~'►h 9tit4..s~..,";ofiIvi
.'I.~E,~~• i~
TIAl'AC°E' [SPI C1Si) 5110111TICy i;(lilD5 SACJF5[1F VAI.l.1:Y P}AI.T.
SEs[+kinc, VashingCnn
(Thoiisuiicl y nC 1975 f]u [ I.irs)
1980 1985 1990
S11uTipr:tra-fln~~t. SlECi1) i~rsr:, ----f]e~st. Stiaa}i~•r:aI7r:pr.
G.00ct:, tis_ore [:,rrsdl;, St ure i;oclds 5i oi e
6.oc.it io«ul--Saies %iiLl'SSdtL'^1 tifale:, ;;riles Sa les saLes
C 1AD t4i I tzo<<s. rl., i i $121,1,00 ~ 73,2 n(i $1481 600 $ 84,600 ~175, 800 $106,000
Rc:nuaie-idei' oF :it'i5A wiChaut Mall 119,890 _b'3,3rf2 102_895 54.302 85.799 4 5,3 0'
TOW.Sr,qA $241,290 $136,502 $251.495 $143,902 $261,599 $151,302
I.i-vL 11rorc•rrtil 1+a11 Sale;s 41.309 29,661 119_?31 _35,308 ll,9 ~`al , 769
E:r• , idii.i I Sa1 eS fai- CB'U/Subutbazi
~;r iarus--, $199,981 $105,841 $201,264 $10$, 594 $203,450 $109,531
Glil) :;Izarc Prnjee[cd PeneCrrati_ua7 99,990 52,92(1 119,336 64,070 136, 31 1 73.387
j3, I t~~,:; ' [51n.) (S[171) (591) (593:) (671) (671.)
R, m,k iiizli - i nf %8 A (c-xcupi Ma ]1] .ii. 99,990 52,92n 8 2,9:?R liA ,5Z4 67,10 36,146
d'~~~~.6•i ocl i'Gitc:tration H:itius (501) [5W4) [41 (41l) (33!
)
t,lil) wittinue t4aly $121,490 $ 73,200 5148,600 $ 89,600 $175,800 $105,000
1w:,, C1sb wi0i Pia'12 _99,990 52,920 119. 336 _64_070 136,311 73,387
f-[,l l Cmp.icr mi t'HD $ 21,41[] $ 20,28[) = $ 29,264 $ 25,530 $ 39,489 ~32,613
'I'r:adc• Ai-e:t klii_,ai i tifi ecl Pof enE i,i1 I'iir
'.;hosspor:; Guoik ' $ 65,381 $ 14,075 $L41 ,277 $ 29.669 $240,0I i $ 1ifi,999
I+iJiu•. t..i l cx i'lIF1CllrL`CI kly V,i I I ry Ki i l
!~~ii~i ~ II , l:4•u~i9~i nreil kv:.va 1 i•li f', •iir1 -iFil4 •1
ro,eorch ecanamici
.
i
d
V?,LL11EY YiALI, LX'ACT
i ~
The estimated i.:+pact of 'lailei'°:ali on Shoppers Goods sales in do~,-ntc-~-:
Snakane for the 1980-90 periad is rsaw presented. ihe estzmated ar_^ua=
sales inDact ranges from about,520 to $33 millian for department staras
an4 aoout $'"I ta $ 35 raill,ion i,or alI Shappers Gaads betaeen 1980 a:~~
190.0, respec°tively (iable 4). ,
~ti'hen tnzs impact is cQmDared ['a the projected growth in unsatisfied sale=
pttential for ShOppers Goods, 'hawever, it is clear that Valley ::all's
campetitive impact ❑n downtown;retailers Gri,ll nQt be extenszve. In ract,
anly 3.n 1980 wi],1 the MalI's fppact on CBD department stare retai.Iers
exceed the natural orowth in u'nsatisfied sa].es potentia3,; thae is, t`= `s-m1_
wi;1 iapac[ aowntawn departmen;t stares by about $20 niilion in 1980 c-=a- '
pa.ed Lv ao-rawth i,n unsatisfied potential esf approximateltr $13 m=11=,
, an the sarne year. Cliart 2 caTn pares [he iaagnzCude of Vallev Mall' S SGlL3G
imoact tv that resulting rram Igrorath in unsatisfied denanti for 5hoppe-s
C-Qods. • ~
~
These findings snould be quali-fi.ed as in].laws: 1
5uuporting data is 1;im_ted. T':e iinear ragressiczr.s use~!
farecast 1980-90 Shaippers Goads are based unrsn twa sets of
point-in-time data 3972 and 1976. Lse of earlier data -=s
a oasis for farecastis is dTStarting because: (1) the secu;ar
decline of SpoKane's~ CBD in the 1960's and early 1970's was ~
stiil anderway, axtd the rejuueaating impact at ExDa
on ciowntawr. Snokane rs not £elt prior to at ].east 1972.
The actuaZ do?lar salIes imgacts on dawntau-n 5hbppino gaods
retailers, rangi.ng fjram abouC $21 -$39 millzon per annum
(Taale 4), are indeed real. The of-Lrsettir.v c~.rcumstancz i_ ~
tne patenCial growth oz ur.satisfiea demand for Sh4OI7e3'3 Ga^--'s
~~t-waen 1980 and 194P in the 5poicane area.
c7eYartme::t stores wijth bvth dawritou°rs and sczourban location=
wilZ essentially he ;able ta neutralize the impact ai t'a11e- ~
Y.all oa their downtdwn operati4ns. Iiawever, Chase do~wu t0 T.-::
degarFaent st❑res withaut tttis dual Iocational representat:.z~n
will experienc+e a st'rang comgetitive-impact an their CED
ogerations.
~
~
~
I
I
I
I
i
162
research c-conamicr
~
P
'Yh~rt ? TOTAL SHDPPERS GOODS SALES FORECAST
IMPACT oF `LALL 4N CBD V5. Sti4.5A u?+SATIeFIED POTE??TI-.L
Sa? e~ (SODD)
300! ImAact
7io- ,
ti••~::~:' UL75r3tISr~et~
Patential
i 3 Q ~ ~~r:•r::'
4.L'Sti •.Y. 4•
L 1 0- : :ti•.
100- ,
'r• rv}•~ti~fr .
~ •:ti;:};.;,i .
}
1]0- }.4.{ a:
' : ti•rr ~ ~:;C;t:
y gl~'}V Y .y •.y .~Pr ~
: tti' :tiv:titi
- . i:ti.;.ti:}~{:
90 - ~ y. •'~•Sr1.'~ J.•.•'.•'~ .'t :1 y
j 1l.~•'f.• :•:ti•.°r:•
60
~"~r:~ }r,: ~:r • r: r.. .
,t}ti;:,{:;~ : : }'r:} s-.•:'r:v}::
f r.:.
rf:~;~. , ~ j;;;x. ~ , ~ • • .y.; ~ .
3 : ; ••r ~ • t.;~;:;:.,ti. • f. ; ~ ~ : k ~ ,ti?~::•y~•=::
~r~;f:~`: Jr? ~ + v.v.ti•s:.:: ~ i ' I ! ~;::;:;{ti:::
~ ~ r. ffr:: E ~ r ti•. :•.v ti•
~•'•'ri: r ~ • I ' ~ I ~ ' f I~•.;.;N:: ,r,
I ~ i~:•: e. E f: ~ I ~ I~'fir:~ :;:.fr,.".
I e ~ i .ti :.ti"{ ~ ' ! ` ~ k ' {`•:.ti':~'•:''
1 i! I ,•.ti':?r:':?•.{~i ~ I~ ~ f. ..iY I1 I ,[`.•.L..~..{'}a
•1~
1980 1985 1990 '
,
uEPAR'I`MEVT STQRE SALE5 FORECA5T
LiPACT ❑F :~'lALL 0N' CBdl V S. 5`iSA UNSATTSF IEI3 POTENT LAL
5ales ($dJ0i7 }
Inpact
60 - tinsatis~ {°ed
PotenWial
45 -
~.r~ •r~
}^.~a~ww
r f
~
30 ii~liii}{}:~v.C~y
y::•:..
~ I~~~ f.~:_ii.titi' i~ I 1 ~ I• a;}?~r~r~~yti:
I 1;{{`
~ i , r C};'r {v:ti•:,
''~~~li1 E;~f''~:.;., iE~~!I, i v;~:;.•:.:::
; ~ ; , ~ ~ 4 ~ i ' ` ~ ~ :•~:r.; r;~: f= , ~ ~ ! ; ; :r::•-r:~:,~:
: j ~ ' ' ~ E ~ ' i E I I ~ 'r ;:~:}}i:v~ ~ , ~ ' i ~ ~ }ti•:?3'{:{{titi
[ •.Y: . . f.
15 I[ i I-t;:~{r: :i
~'~1 E ,'v.•ti7-.. .~A}:}}f~ ~~i~~~~~~r:..:rrv:}:
iti}•::::v::%: :-:ti%: f~}.{•r
: i ~ i i ~ i . r~ti~::v: ~ ~ ~ i ` ~ . ~ i: i~.. ~ • I : ! I i ~ ~ ~:v}:ti~:
~ ~ E I i ~Y,.~::':::' I~ I i' '-:•:v:::•
' ~ ~ I ►.r.} r:. ~ ~ ' f r::; }'.ti•: ti ~ i : ~ i :•r} ~
kk
` If ! ~l~• ~ 4•..+..~•
• ~ I i I I ! t1 7+:': , ~ ~ ~ ~ I i f`{%:~ ; . ; I I ~:;7~:~} :y.,.:':^
~ '-M~#YBiV~~. ; ~ i ~ ~ i . ~ . .
. 1980 19$5
Soarce: Research Econar.lics rC'Sea'CCh t3Caflomlc!
~
~
'U?ENDiX A
~n~iation must he taKEn into accQunC in projecting retaiI sales levels. - ~
Mast financial data in this study nas been exgressed in constant 197,55
dni lars of purclzasing pawer. T:iis was aone so that calid dollar com-
parisons cauld be made. `Fhus, only grawth in "real" pu-rchasing po=aer
was accounted far.
,The resder may wish to eflnvert canstant 1975 dallar income or sales aata ~
into eurrent-year equivalents: The mechanics Qf calculating thzs are nct
difficult. Siaaply multiply real retail sales figures bv respectirre in-
flatar caefficzer.ts according 'to the future fvrecast year desired. For
example, given the constant 19175 dollar Ma3.l inpact at $22.7 mi11ian on
tatal 19$0 CSD denartment stare sales, the Ig$D rurrent dallar ecuivalent r
is S29.7 -miIIiQn that is, 522.7 m%llion t,mes the correspandzag zn-
ilaLC7r coefficient af 1.3070. Coeificients to inflate into current dolla:-=
'_975 cQnstant dollar retai3, sa'Zas enuzvalents follows: `
Year ±nslator Coefficierat ~
1975 -0.040D
1980 1.30?Q
1985 11.1o8i
- 1990 2.2325
!
~
. ,
1
. !
i
~
!
164 rLzsearch eGoncm3c!
~
1#PPENI}LY 8
Spakane Area I3etaartmenC SCcares ks❑ Lacation
CBD Nnrth Suburban East 5uburhan Sauth Suburban
' Bon Marche ATarthtawn: University Cityt IHanito:
' Crescent Crescent Lamants
- Sears Penneq's
Crescent
'PlIontgomery Wards 5hadle Center:
Lamnnts
Penney's
J.J. Newberxq*
Nordstroms -
P ercney' s
J.J. Newberry*
~*Apparently included in the U.S. Ceasus counts
-i3--
1 fi5
research ecnnQmicf
1
I ~
;
I
APPENDIX F
VALLEY NIALL IMPACT
' dlV VALLEY
f ~
~
~
I
I
I
i
i
~
i
i #
-
I
1
~ w
' I
P,repared by
I !
. Research Ecanamacs -
245 Spokane Falls B7vd.
5pokanE, Washingtvn
99201
i -
'I
! 166
+
f4 rC'SeC1rCh
- eCC3t`1Qf1'lIC!
June 13, 1978
Afr. Harry Neraman, Jr.
President
Newm,an Pragerties 3711 i.ang Beach BouTevard
_ Long Beach, Califoraia 90$01
Dear Mz, Newman:
`Ihe purpose vf this Zetter is La presexat caur estimates ❑f the ecanomfc
impact on 5pok.ane Vallep retailers of a prcpased 360,000 square £aat
' shapping eentar Valley Mall ta be Iercated along I--90 ,j ust east
Qf Sa1.livan Raad anr3 north af Broadway Arremue. 5pecifically:
Ta what extant wiZZ YaZtey MaZZ capture existirag
cmd fuYure $aZes at Uraiversity City and at eam-
uetiti.ve retaz:t autlets atrlrtg Erzst Sprague Aven,ce?
`Fhe scope of our aaalpsis is limited, since anly sales imgaets on
University Gity and EasL Sgrague retaflers are assessed. Basic data
came from secvndary saurces, part3cu1arly a 1976 "market feasibil3tp
ana3ysis" of the prvposed 5pokane Va1ley MaT2. AI.T monetary figures
are preseated as cvnstant 1975 dollars so that reaI sales impact•com-,
parisoas caa be czearly assessed.
PresenClyy UnivQrsitp City and East Sprague retailers capturce the
majarity of sal.es in Che Va1.lev Axea.* Valley Ma1Z's market penetra-
tioa wauld Tse highest in this primarg Trade .Area; therefnre, such ,
sales penetrati,ons are viewed as essentislly impactisg thQ reta3lers
ixs Universitp C:t-~ an3 a1ong East Sprague.
The fo71].cwing "•auesriea and answer" aaaZytical techaique wi.IT be used
to estJ.mate,f:.e degree to which th3.s market.penetration wiZl take, place.
*The VaiIeY Area ia defined to iaeltfrie the "East Area" ❑f the SpDk.ane
Metrrapolitaa Area, as d2tiner3 by the Spokane Countp Pianning Co=issicn,
and the Pcrst FaI;.s - Rathdi:um Census 17ivisiva in Idaho.
167
dr, david L eccreL predd+Bnt - 245 spakane talli blvd spof[ane. wrashtngtan 99201 - 509 • 74 7 9123
I~
~
Can cz naw shopping cerater create purchasing pcwer?
I
A'new shapping ceatez does not create gurchasing
pawer. Rather, the sales gotential of a center 1
• is,dependent upon its competitive effectiveness
in~the Trade Area. Basica3ly, TC wi1l draw
volume from trav sources:
~I
--The purchasiag power af the pxesent
~ populativn now paCroaizing existing r
~ 5tore8.
The gurchasing power accaQCpanying new
~
~ popu].ation grewth-.
Va l~ley Mal2 wilI not create anew purchasing pawer; ~
~ itlwill, however, cause a redistrihvtian ❑f area
retail, expend3tures. The specific isseae to be
addresseci here is tlte magnitude af this sales
red:~.stribut3on away fram University City and
Eas~it Sgrague retailers. ~
I
~
I
dow rmaeh purchasing power fo:r "campcrrtisan gonds" daes the val2ey Area
generate?* I . ~
i
Tvta1 compazisan goads sales ariginating fram
Valiep Area residents were $4$.6 mfllion in
197~. This tozal was derived by multiplying
per' capita camparisort gaods expenditures by
the 'Valley Area populaticrre fax that year, as ~
shown below:
~
VALLEY AR.EA COMPA,RIS(3N GOflDS WENDITURES
(1915 Canstaat Dollars)
' 1976
~I
Populatina ~ 72,900
Per Cap#.ta 4xpenditures $666
Tvta2 Expen~itures 4
(M.illions $48. 6
~
I
*Camparfsan Gaods are deFi,nedlas General Merchandzse (includes Department
Stores), Apparol, Furniture/Appliances, and MisceZlaaeous Shapping Gavds ~
the types of merchandise sold ia shupping ceaters.
1 68 ~
t'a~e TwQ research ecanamicr
h'aw much of this Yatley Area pacr►chasing power is actualZy snent z:n
S~p01:a+.e Ya2 Zey stores?
Pare of the $48.5 m3lI.ion ia purchasiag pawer
generated by Valley Area residents is spent out-
. side the Va3l.ey. The magaituda af this leatcage
depends heavily upon the I4catiou, quantiey and
quality af comparisoa gaads Offerec3 by Valley
Area stores.
Aa estf.mated 544,900 square feet of retail seTT- ing space for comparison gaods exists in the
Valley Area. tlniversity City camprfses approx-
imately 45 percent af this totaZ. S'hopping -
center campaxison goods stores typica3ly average
e sales in the range af from $60 -$80 ger square
faot. Based vn ar► average perfarmaace for Valley
Area stares of $iO per square faot, a tvtal o£
$38.1 milZioa in sales would be captuxed. Thus,
ia 1975 the Valley Area performed as a"net
exparrer" of over $10 mil3ion ($48.6 milZi.aa
~ minus $38.1 miT13on) ia comparisvn goods pur--
chasing power.
Major Valley stores (particularly those at
Uaiversfty City) are attracting patranage fram
a wider trade area than tt►e Valley Area; how-
ever, the $I0+ millina net export Ievel reflects
bath the coraget3tive imgact n€ 5pakane's dorRm-
town reCail coacentratioa as tiaelI as Che lacis of
a simiIar selectian of campar3san goads r.rFthin
the Spvkane VaI].ey.
What shuzre af existina Yalley Area comparison goods sales rvauld Vczllcy
MctN. capture?
The distiactiaa ttas now been made between Valley
Area purch~sing pawar aud setual Valley sales;
the difference is over $30 millian per year in
camparison ,goads expendituse leakages ta retailers
autside the Valley. Valley Mall raould help stem
this Ieakage; Che Ceatex rvauld a2,so tend to
attract sales that are now eaking place e3sewhere
in the averall Spokane Trade Area. *"The focus
*The total Txade Area far Valley MaI1 is defined as the Valley Area, the
remainder, af Spokane County, and. the I4:=surrounding ccaun'ties, Iess that;'
small portion of Knotenai County, Idaho contained in the Valley Area.
169
?3ge Threa fe5ealGh 'l.ConOITfK:!
!
here, however, is only crn the degree a£ competi-
ti,~e infringement that the Center will have un
existing Valley retailers.
I ~
We,estimate that Va11ey MaII would cagture $13.3
million af existing (1976) sales from Valley drea
re~aflers essenCialIy Uaiversity City and
East 8prague merchants. Geaeral merchandise
sales, such as those fnund at dapartmsnt stores,
are estimated to be 52 percent ($19, $ mil.lion) ~
af;the $38.1 milliQa af comparisan gnods sald in
I976 by Vallep retai3.ers. Estiraated capture
ra~es arcd sales genetratiores fal3.ow:
i
EST MTEII PENETRAT I4N SY VALLEY MALL 4
DF E7C I5T Il?G VALLEY AREA SALE 5
(;tillions of 1975 Canstant Dollars)
~ 1976
I~
Tata1. Valley Area Comparison Gaods 5ales $3$.3 ~
1
Share to BepartmenL Stores $19.$
Valley MslI's Sales Fenetrati.Qn @ 40% $ 7.9
i
5hare to Qther Camparisvn Gaods Stores 18.3
Valley MaII's Sa1es Penetratiaa @ 18% 3.4 ~
TOTAL 3MPACT aN qAIyLEY O.EA STORES $11, 3
~
Haw rapid2y wi l l Va ZZey Arerz purchrxsing power far carmnarzs4n goads rrrow ~
irt the ficture? (
- i
i
- Val].ey Area purchasing pawer accnmganying new
papulativn growth is fvrecast to strongly in-
crease during the 1980's. Total comparisna 4
goods sales are forecast to expand at a strong
10.7 percent average asin►saI rate in the 1976-
1990 perriDa. Sy 1990, the additivnaY paarly
purchasing power for comparison gaods generated
by Val3ey Area resideats is forecast to tvtal
$40.7 milli.on rAOre than that existing in 1976. ~
Demaind projections for the I9$0's follow:
,
~
~
,
i
i
~
Page Faur 170 feSC--afGh ecvnomicr
~
VALLEY ARU COMP9RISON Ga(7DS PidRCHAS'LiNG PQWER POT=IALS
(1975 Constant Dollars)
' Actua1 , Proiectiorts
1976 1980 1985 I990
Population 72,900 83,600 92,600 1[]I,600
Fer Capital Expenditures $666 $721 $796 $879
Total Expenditures (m331.lians) $48.6 $60.3 $73.7 $89.3
Yacxeases oner 1916 demand (millions) $11.7 $25.1 $40.7
' How mueh nf this yrFovth in Yalley A.recz purchasing pawer wauld TlqUey
Mall capture?
Valley Mall 3s forecast to capture 40 percent
ofr zhe increase in purchasing gower far depart-
ment stare goads and 18 perceut of the growth iu purchasing pawer for other camparison $vods
withia the Valley Area.
Whcrt is tFre dotT,crr ua Zzvne o f Y'a Zl ey Area purchasing pawer that Ycc lLey
M:LZ wcncld capture in the I980-1990 perzad?
As noted, the twa baaic saurces af potent3.al
" sales at Valley NIall are: (I) The purchasing
pvwer af the preseat gopu].ation now patraaizing
P-xisting Trade Area stvres, and (2) The pesrchas-
ing power accampanpiag neur papulatian grnwth.
The failowing Cable shows ValIey MaI3's putential
campetitive effectiveness #aa attracting future
Valley Asea patronage frvca these two eources.
Note, these data seflect tIze extent Ca wh3ch
Valley Mall wvulc3 capture purchasing pawer
generated in the Va1ley Area, nat the future.
sales Qf existing Spakane Va].ley stares.
173
Page Fzve research ecanamicf
!V
,
PROJECTED PENETRATION SY VAI.LEY MALL DF ALL
COMPARISDN GOOD PURCHA5E5 BY VALLFY AREA RESIDIINTS
(Millions af,1915 Canstant Dallars)
. _ 1980 1985 1990 Tatal Purchases by Va1lev Area Residents*
Degartment 5 tore Expenditures $37.. 4 $ 38 .3 $46.4
Dther Compar%son Goods Expenditures 2$.9 35.4 42.9 ~
- Totals $60.3 $13.7 $83.3
Valley Mail's PQtential Market 5hare
Mail Department Steres C 40% $I2.6 $15.3 $I$.6 ~
Ma13 Other Comparisan Gaads Stores
@ 1$x 5.2 6.4 7.7
Tatals $I7.$ $21.7 $26.3 ,
What wau Zd ne tke to ta Z sa l e s impact on aa l Zey Arerz ret,ai Lers o f va l l ey
MrzLZ irt the 1984'3?
. ~
Valley Mall's saies impact on T3nfversity City
and East 5prague retailers would be less Chan
t'haC depicted in the previaus tatxle. The
reasvn: Without a new Valley retail comple-N to
capture leak.ages, rauch af the future parchasing ~
power geaerated by 5pakane Valley residertts
wauld cnntinue ta he spent outside the Valley
mainIy in downeorRm Spakase.
Past e3cperienee reveals that the Valley Area
purchasing power leaIcage fcr comparison goods ~
sales is abaut 22 percent. LFaing this share aad
extragal,atiag reveals that the poteneial ecanumic
impacC af Valley PSa1.l vt Valley Ar+ea retailers
essentiaZly LTniversity and East 5prague taerchaats
would range from $13. $ mil],ion ia 19$43 to S20.8
million in 1990. This is iilustrated on the ~
fallcvwing page:
*Anywhere in the "total" Trade Area. ~
R
#
Page si. 172 research ecvnomfar
~
PRQJECTED SALE5 CAPTLTRED SY VALLEY MAI.L
- IiNSIDE TFiE VAZI.EY AREA
(Millions af 1975 Constaat Dollars)
Camp$r3svn Goods Sales
Inside the Valley Area 13$0 19$5 I990
Depastment 5tores:
Tozal. $24.5 $29.9 $36.2
Va11ey Aiall' s Share 9.8 12.0 14.8
flther CQmparis+oa Gaods Stvres:
' Tvta1. 22.5 27.5 33.5
Valley Mall' s Sf3are 4.0 S. p 6.0
TOTAL 5ALE5 IPACT OF MATL
ON VALZEY AREA RETAII.ERS $13.8 $17.0 S20.8
~ ' • 5iacereaY,
~ -
DilV'ia T. ESCIet
DTE.effi
age Seven 173 feSLarCh ecOnCmk ,t
i
~
' - i
,
4PpENDIX G
,
TRAFFIG ANRLYSIS AND,RECQMNiENQATIONS
I ~
~
i
-I
~
~ r
i
~
; -
i
~ -
i ~
~
~
f
~
~ Frepared by #
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Inc,
`
l ~
II
i
i '
i
i
I
~
3 74
N~ALLE~.' MALL
5PDkAN,E, WASH Ii1'GTON
Prepared f'vr
Nekrman Propert i es
By
. LIl1SCDTT, L.kkr & GREE~'SPAN, INC. -
. June, 19?8
175
i
E
- ~
I`ABUE UF CONTENT5
i ~
I
~
~
Title ~ Page
Introduction....... . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I
Lacatinn........ I
Pi'vposed Project.,.~ 2
~
Street and Freek•ay SyTstem 3
~
P].anned Roadway It3ipra`-cments......................... 6
~
i
T.rai`fic Generation _arid'Distributifln . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 6
i
~
Reeommended Zmpravements - 1985 - Withaut Va11Ey Ma1l 9 ~
~
I
Recommended Imprvvemeiiis - 1985 - With lrall ey Ma1I....... 10
i
Cmnclusions .............................................12
Tables ~
~
1. Recent Area Traff'ic Caunts 5
' 2. Traffic Generation 8 ~
~ -
I
~
~ Follvtvin~
~ Page
Exhibits j
. 1. Vicinity Atap....~-----•• 1
2. Site Plan ! 2
5. 1985 PAi Peak Haur Distrihutivn 9
4. Irnprvvements.... 11
I
~
i
~
i76
-
VALL~ iLALL
SPOKANE7 ~1F'~1SI'~r~GTDN
I?`lt.rpdl1Ct1C1I1
This renort detai3s the traf fic irnpact trom tI-ie proposed
1°Valle`° A1a11" Regiotial ShonPing Center and peripliery uses in
Spokane County, k'asliiizgton. The site bas been Tield checked with
trai'fic caunt and other pertizient data ohtained fram the kFashing-
toii State Higlikay Department, Tlie Spokane Cvunty Road and Planning
Departments, and, tlirough several PM peak periad turning movement
counts conducted by Linscott, La►v & Greenspan, Inc.
Traffic generatian projectians have been estimated for the
development with traftic da.sf.ributed ta tlie lacal street and f'reewati-
syctem. An ar~alysis has been condtacted to determ~.ne areas of prfl- `
jected raadivay and intersectivn deficiencies ►,rith measures recom-
mended t❑ mi#,igate these 1'uture prob.Iems. Conclusions summarize
Uoth project related imnacts and recommended zmprovements.
Setting
Lvcation
mhe 70 acre prDject site zs centrally lacated in Spokane
Cnunty, Washangtvn, appraximately 10 miles easteTly of dDu'i3tawn
Spokane (see Ea:hibit 1). The property is situated on the north--
east carner of the Broadwayf5ullivan Road in-tersection and is
bounded to the nvrth by Interstate Highway 90, tv the south hv
Broadway,' to the east by undeveToned and residential praperty, and
ta the krest by Sul].ivan Road and by botli an existing Red Lian Motor
inn and by a Standard Gas Station. T'he prvject site is undeveZaFed
and relatively 1'lat.
177
n .t ~ n ,
~
Q
~
I e~R RD.
• p~~ vv ~ t
~'`'r T ~ ~ ~ T Fl.
5P N~ o ~ ~ IL
/flfRA^PWAY
1 sP1tA~•,1]E V~. f -
~
AfiIF
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - ~ - d
- - - - - - - 3ywv AVri
W
y '~y
~
in ~ .
~C
~
1
~
a 1
V C N TY MAF
SZ~+4~. bf M+L~~
1~6 LIw5Ct7TY, Ld.w ~ C~~E~1-15PAN , INC,, ENG1t~~ ~F~`~ ! i~1;767KA~ ~ V~►LlEY M ~hL.L
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Inc., Engin??;s
The erea currounding the site is agricultural and residential
in naturre, with new subdivisitrns gradually replacing agricultural
uses. The nearest r etail--commercial develapment tn the site is
aJ.vng 5prague 5treet, an east-west roadway lacated one-hali' miie
sautherly of Broadway. A McDonaJ,ds Restaurant, lacated across
Su3livan Road from the prv ject, i.s the an],y other cammercial
establishment lacated in close proximity ta the site.
A Iarge industrial area is located vne mi3e northerly of the
sitc along Sullivan Road. This area contains the Kaiser Aluminium
Trentwood Works and the Spokane Industrial Park. This industrial
area is naw the largest tratfic generator in the area, Within
the next ten years most of the undevelaped ar agricultural property
wzthirn a two mile radius of the Valley Mall si,te slaould be developed
y anto residential, cammercial, or industrial uses.
Pranvsed Prvject
The "Vall.ey Mall" project wi11 consist of a 650,000 square f'oot
gross leasable area (GLA) shopping maTl containing riepartment stores
and retaiL shops. The mall wili be centraIly located on the prv-
'perty (see Exhibit 2). A 113,000 square f oat GLA Convenience Center
wil.l be lacated at the westerly end of the praperty with 67,000
square feet GLA` of restaurants and garden affices lacated at the
easterZy end of the property. The total project wil1 cvntain
830,000 square feet GLA of development.
A loap roadway will encircle the rnall stores t❑ provide easy
access ta a1l parking areas. The mvst recent prvject site pian
(5/11/78 by McCle.llan, Cruz, Gaylard) shaws three project drave-
ways to Sroadway and vrae pro j ect driueway to Sull ivan Rnad. All
driveways wil1 connect directly tv the lovp road.
~
- 2 -
179
/12%
TQ
i4-IP06'rRIA1- A.REA
Ta `
SPoK.~~y~
'
~ • ~ . ►r~.~,~
~
Lf CJ~-1 • `
- - - - - - - - - - -
- A}►►5,
~ SrA,rjvr~s~ . ~ ~ 5F'O I[ANe
v ' ~ • , V'~►►1.1~ ~ - OF F1GE 5 ~
L- 6- V '
RESTAr.,~t+T '
~l c ~7aW►4~ir`s ~ {J ~ ~ G~HT~►t ~
~:..r
! Jj~ ~ .
~ J . • . , ~ .
• Si~4v W~Y ~
A L ~
5-rA,-rtOi4 ~
`a
x
x
0
~
AOO
~ E
1,;F1, =~1 iLo77j ~~A iG dh Ab ! Si~~ICAN E 11~I~L~Y M~ I~
Lir+ccott, Law $ Greenspan, Inc., Engineer5
Street and Freeway Svstetn
The rraadways in the vicinity of the praject site prvvide
gvvd local and regi,onal acce-ss. However, many are nat built to
their ultimate standards.tYrus eausing capacity problerns with
exista.ng peak Ferivd traffic valumes.
Interstate 90, (I-JD) running east-west, pravides exccllent
regionai access £rvm the si.te to the City of 5pokane, the west
partaion of the Spokane ValJ.ey, the ncrrthern Idaho panhandle (and
such cities as Coeur d'AIene) and western A4ontana. rt carra.es ~
four travel lanes adjacent ta the site, expanding to six in th~
qiLtv of-S.p.okane. The 5ul].ivan Road intercliange with I-90 is a-
diamQnd interchange, prnvxding 14 faot wide sangZe lanes fcar each
vn and ofr-ramp. The paved shaulciers an each off-ramp,i althcaugh
not marked, someti.mes permit right and Teft turaaing drivers ta
separate and i'vrm two turning ianes at 5ullivan Roady Neither on-
off ramp intersectian with Sullivan Road is signalized. The
closest other I=90 interchanges to 5ullivan Road are located twa
miles easterly and two miTes westerJly of 5u31ivan Road at Barker
Road and Pines Itoad respeetiveiy.
Suliivan Road is a major nerth-south arteraal running along
the western project boundary. It pravides access to Interstate 90
frvm the residential areas sautherly of the site and from the
industr3al areas northerly of the site. Suilivan Road connects
Trent Road (State Route 20) and Sprague Avenue, both major east-
►~est arterials-transi.ting the north and south sades respectively
of the 5pokane Valley. Sulla.van Rvaci has twv Janes southerly of
Sroadway and ranr ianes nartherly of the I-90 %nterchange to Trent
Rvad. ; Ttae Sullivan Road vverpass at 1-90 is anly two lanes wide.
BetWeen the I-99 over•pass and Brvadway (adjacent ta the site),
Su1livan Road carries two northbound lanes, vne southbound Zane,
and Ieft-turn packets in #.he southbound directicrn at Braadway and
at the main entrance to the Red Liaan Inn. A narthb+ound left-turn
lane is also provided at Mission Road, Mission forming a four-
4 • .
way intersectican,,wi.th the main ent,rance to the Red-.Lion Znn.
~ 3
181
~
LinscQtt, LaG~ & Greenspan, Enc., Engineers
P "
Braadway is a narrow -':wo lane raadway with dirt shoulders ~
adjacent to and easter],y of the project site. Westerly of
SF.ill1V€1T1 Ro$d, at cvntinues as a two lane roadway althougb wide
gravel shoulders allow vn,-street parki.ng in mvst Iocatians. The
posted speed on both Braaai'aay and Sullivan Road adjacent ta the /
, i
project site is 35 miles per haur. The Sroad►aay/Sulla.van Road
irttersection is signalized: Afire house an the sdutheast corner
vf this intersection has atcess to the Iocal streets via a drive-
way i'eeding directly into the intersectian. ~
Mission Road is two lanes wide running parallel to and just
sou#herly Qf Interstate 90, west of Sul3ivan Raad. It traverses
primariTy reszdential neighbarhaods although it also provades ,
access to a hospital approximately 1.5-miles westerly c+f 5u1J.ivan
i
Road. ~
Sprague Avenue carries s%x lanes vt traffic westerly of
Sullivan Road transitioning trr faur lanes just easterl.y o#° Sullivan ~
Road. The Sullivan/Sprague intersectivn is signalized with Ieft-
turn pockets and left turniphasing prvvided on Sprague Avenue. The
makeup of Sprague Avenue would be described as strip commerciai ,
with several small to medium size retaiT shopping areas, lacated ~
one to fa.ve miles westerly ~ of Sullivan Road_ There are several narrow tw❑ lane rural roads praviding access
hetween Broadway and Sprague Avenue which might be used by project
traffic (Conklin Rvad, Flara Road). These raads experience signi- ~
f'icant bi.cycle, fvot, and hvrse traffic. Sight distances at the
intersections af these minvr roadways is svmetimes limited by the
abundant tree and brvsh grvw€h.
I 4
Recent area traffic counts are presented in Table 1. Counts
were obtained Trom the Spokane Cvunty Road Department and the
Washington State Highway Ilepartment. Accident recvrds were also
tabulated by the abave Caunty and State agencies far various ~
intersections zn the vicinity oT the pro ject, Nvne af the inter- -
sections within a hal#` mile radi.us o£ the si.te experience signifi-
cant acci.dent problems. !
~
j _ 4
; 182
Linscatt, Law & Grep-nspan, Inc., Engineers
TABLE 1
RECEiVT AREA TRAFFTC COUNTS
DAILY
5 TREET LaCA~' ION DAY ~3ATE V f3LU►'IE t 2)
Sullivan Rd. 5/v Sprague Friday 5/27/77 7,340
N/0 5prague " 5/27/77 9,657
. S/v Hro adway " 5/20/77 91707
N/o Sroadway 5J20177 11,402
N/a Missivn " 9/16/77 16,242
11i/o 1-90 W. B. rr 9/23/77 13y 472
on-vff ramp -
S/❑ Euclid Ave. " 9/23/77 13,309
S/v Trent Rcl. " 9/23/77 11,352
Broadway E/a Adams Rd. Friday 5/13/77 31062
W/v Sullivan Rd. " 5/20/77 3,460
E/o Sullivan Rd. " 5/20/77 1,905
, WJo Flara Rd. " 5/20j77 1,385
E/o Flora Rd. " 5/20I77 397
- Mission Rd, W/+n Sullivan Rd. Friday 9J16/77 2,367
Sprague Ave. E/o Sullivan Rd. Friday 5/27/77 12,705
W/o Sullivan Rd. " 5/27/77 13,465
, E/o F1ara Rd. " 5I27I77 10,232
W/a Flora Rd. T' 5/27/77 11,292
Flora Rd. S/o Braadway Friday 5/20/77 1,342
Nf v Brvadway " 5/20/77 1,110
N/o 5prague " 5/27/77 11335
Icaterstate 30 W/v Sullivan Rd. 1976 23,300
1977 25,900
E/o Sullivan Rd. 1975 17,500
3977 18,800
Saurce: WashingtQn S#.ate Department of Highways, Spukane
Caunty Road Department.
(1)Al1 counts nan--directiDnal, i. e. , total volume for hoth
dzrectivns vf traffic. Peak liour vvlumes nat available.
423Approx3mate 50-50 directianal spla-t during 24-hour periad.
~
_ g _
183 -
~
Linscati, E.a w$r Greenspan, Inc., Engineers
I
Planned RQadwa.y Tmpz•ovements
Spakane Coiinty has submitted app].icativns fvr federal fundzng
to improve Suliivan Road to a ful1 five Iane section between
5prague Avenue and the I-90 interchange. However, past applica-
tions i'vr i'unding lzave been turtied down. The County 1ias recagnized ~
the exista.ng traffi.c problems vn this section of Sulli.van Raad f or
severa3 years but has been unable to fund the needed improvements.
Mr. Jack Finney,, Spokane Cvunty Traf fic Engaineer, belieVes that w]xen
the State I3zghway Department is ready to recvnstruct and improve ~
the existirag Sulla.uan Road interchange with 1-901) federal fundi.ng
wvuld be available for the improvements needed alvng Sullivan Road.
The Washingtvn 5tate Highway I]epartment's current scheduling ~
shokrs design work to begin in 1979 for reconstruction af the 1-90
Sullivan Rvad interchange. Cvnstructiota is scl7eduled to begin in
early I982, taking approximately from one-ha1f to ane year to complete.
The mvst prv'bable recvnstructivn plan, accvrding to Mr. Jon Manton, ~
ktashingtvn State Highway I]epartment, would have a secvnti overpass '
cvnstructed, thereby providing a two-lane bridge far each directivn
of traffic. Both the east and ►aestbound on-off ramp intersecta.ons
with 5ullivan Rvad wauld he signalized. It is assumed that the
ramps would be widened to provi,de for twe traffic 3anes at their
intersectians with Sullivan° Road, and left--turn 3anes would be
provided ❑n 5ullivan Road at the approach to each on ramp.
~
Traffic Generation and Distributian
"The Valley MaIl Regianal 5happing Center and its periphery uses are projected to generate 31,240 daily trip ends (15,620
entering trips and 15,620 departing trips) with 1,180 1T"1bflUC1d FM ~
peak hour tr3ps and 3,275 outhaund PM peak hour trips (see Table 2).
The peak hour for analysis purpases has been se].ected as 4:00 to
5:00 PM an a weekday where the combined shopping, xndustrial and,
off'ice cammuter traff'3ic is expected to produce the most severe ~
aperational tra.ff'ic problems. , -
' 6
~ 184
Linscott, La~•= & Greenspan, 4r,c., Engcneers
It is estimated that 5 percent of the gross traftic generated
by the center wauld be dual purpase trips (z. e. 5 percent of the -
trips wvuld remain internal to the grvaect site; a shopping trip
where the driver alsv stvps at one of the restaus•an#s ar a persvn
shapping at bvth the cvnvenience center and the shopping mall).
It is #'urther estimated that at Zeast 15 percent of the projected
` mali trafFic kfould he trips already part of the existing an-street
traffic. These estimates result in ~an~y°8D percen~of trie pro--
jected Valley MaII trafric being considered as new to the rfladway
system surrounding thc site. '
, I3istribution of traff"ic between indivadual drivetiqays and
through the intersectian of Sullivan Raad and Broadway is dependent
on the access design an 5u11ivan Road. The Iatest sate plan shakrs
access from 5ezllivan Road south of the existing gas station and
south of Nlission Raad. At tha.s loeation, abaut 250 feet southerly of
the Mi,ssion Road zntersecti.vn,. it would not be passible ta i.nstall
$n adequste left-turn lanQ vr lanes for left turns into the mall.
A ma13 entrance apposxte Missian Raad would traverse the Red Lion
F Inn parka.ng area, require replacement parking tacilities, and ad-
versely af fect access to the front porti,an of the Red Lion Tnn.
The follawing distribution and the statements ❑f needed street
improvements at°e thereforre based vta the assumption that the pre-
p]~~ r
sently planned dr~.vew~y ~wYll be restra,cted ta right turns only.
_ A discussian of passible di£ferences, shauld tha.s matter be
resolved ta provxde left turn angress and egress,is alsD included
hereinaTter.
. Prv ject traffic was distrihuted to the Iaca1 street and free-
way system vn a lagac basi.s taking into account exa.sting traffic
patterras, existing and prvjected resadential develvpment, and
projected rvadway constructivn. Turnxng mvvement restrictions
were placed on vehicies at certain driveway intersectians with the
Iacal street system. T7istribution patterns diff'ered slightly far
- 7 -
185
' Linscott, Latv & Greenspan, Inc., Enginreers ~
I
each af th+e three major uses within the Valley Mall Prajeet (i_e. ~
The Department 5tores and 'Speciality Shops surrflunding the Mall; the
~Canuenience ~Center; and t~z~ Garden Qffice/Restaurant CvmpZex).
~ - - - '
/
I TABLE 2
TRAFFIC GEhERATION
~
~
~ i
~ DAILY ~ PM PEAK HOllR
IN ~ OUT
U5E SIZE i RATE 2 VOL ~TE YO~, RATE VaL
~ TE/f t
Ma1l Buildings 550,000 ft2 34.5 22,425 1.23 840 1.29 840
i
Convenience 113,004 ft2 50.4 6,825 2.6 295 2.9 330
Genter i
i
Gard en Off i ce 40,000 ft 2 11.7 470 .19 10 1.48 fiQ ,
~
Restaurants 27,00[3 f~2 56.3 1,52~D 2.'~7 75 2.69 45
i2
TOTAL 830,00[] ft 31,240 1,180 1,275
I
Source fvr Trip Rates:; "Trzp Generatian" -An Informatianal
~ Report by The Institute of Transpor-- ~
~ tation Engineers, 1976_
I
I
-ApproximateIy 40 perG~nt af the tvtal project traffic is pro--
jected ta arra.ve and depart via lnterstate 90, 27 percent t❑ and !
f'rom the west (Sp❑kane) and 13 percent to and from the east (Goeur
d'Alene). QveralZ, 62 pere;ent of development tra#'fie is prvjected
to arrive flr depart westerly af the site, S percent southerly af
the site, fi percent norther~ly of the site and 24 perceizt easterly
of the sxte. The shopping mall ►,riJ.l attract a'l'arger percentage of
i
_ g _
~
186
Li+iscati, ~aw & Greenspdn, Inc., Engrneers
tra#°fic tv 'the site by 1-90 than wil1 the Cvn`Fenience -
Center, which will attract patranage frvm a clientele living- clocer
to and more unifvrmly distril}uted around the saite. Exhibzt 3 shvws
PM peak hour project traffic distributed to the locai strest system.
The previously mentioned 5 percent reducti.an in vvlume due to
internal trips has been applied to the traffic shvwn in Exhihit 3.
Trai'fic from Valley Malt will have a signifa.cant impact on ~
SuTlivan Road betk+een the I-90 interchange and Brsaadway, with a
lesser imgact extending sautherly to Sprague Avenue. Sroadway will
al.so experience s significant trai"fac impaGt from development
traffic adjacent to the project site.
_ Street widths an the vicinity of the Valley Mall will havE to
be widened to prvvide adequate capa+city for future traffic, with
or withvut Ma11 deVeZnpment. 'I'he year 1985 was used for traffic
analysis as it was assumed ali praject development woeald be cQmplete
with traffic patterns estabiishe+d by that time. Exist3ng an-street
traffic was assumed to k-raw 5 percent per ,yeo to 1985 exc3usa.ve of 16VO
the neur traffic frvm the Va1l.ey Mali. This growth rate appears
apprnpriate due to the rapidly expanding residential and industrial
grvwth in the area.
Recvmmended Improvements - 1985 - W3thout VaIleY Mall
It is important to recagnize that even without develapment vf
Valley ~IaZ1, varipus street imprvvements wi11 be needed. The
fal,lawing street sect3ans wil,l be required by 1985 to accommodate
area traffie erren without project derreivpment. :
. - . ,
Sulli:van Raad,- twv thraugh traffic lanes in eaeh direction
will be needed frvm Sprague Avenue to Trent Rva+d. Left-turn lanes
wauld he needed at 5prague Avenue, Sroadway, Missi,an Road and
the I-90 eastbound and westbaund on ramps. Signalizatian will be
x-arranted at Sprague Avenue, Braadway, Mission Rvad, and bvth the
1-90 eastbaund and westbound ramp intersections:, _
. y t "1 ~ J
- 9 -
187
~
4
Z 7 ~
~ +~dJ ' ~ ~d! ~5 • ~3` ~ tr,
~
r•
ci
f +~llCn
~~~aLi~ W H~ r +~j~
_ S~~
°/Q
°1 ~
~
piz Ac-~~~ 5--~`
~ 3 s 7-6 -a'
_
I~ti45VAt~S h~z- • ,
~ ~ iss
lN7~RST-4T~
~ - - - ~ ~
' .
=
l Z ol
~
_ S
~
.
~ 11 Z D ~ ►a ~
~ •
IZ I 5 ouT `
a G ~H ~
-rM
3A0 o
~r o
~
4-0 ~ I
25
. ~ .
~
7
~
Y
~
O
v
qlt 1,3
~o
~ E-- -4 o G 8
! 5
E1.,-4 D -
- ON-STR~~T M. PEAK NOUK
VOLUME'~• -
~-1oUR YO~UM~S •
R~G~ONAL PEF~L~N'f DIS'fR1~1~110N
(A),
~
. ~
~ HouK vl~-~TKIgu-~iaN
~,pGKA N E:-~- \/Q lLCY MA L~
ion
Linscott, Lar: ur Greenspan, inc.. Enyineers ~
,I .
Braar3way - two t}zrouLHlh trai'fic lanes in each direction will •
- ,
be needed westerly of Sullivan Road.
1-90 Tnterclzange - a second oVerpass sliould Ue canstructed,
or the existing bridge widened, to provide twa travel lanes in
each direction vn Si1l131'an Road. Each overpass should be widened
4
to prodide J.eft-turn ianes at the an ramps, a3id the eastbound off
ramp should be widened to pravide f,wa lanes on the apgroach to Sullivan Road. ~
fiecommended Improvements - 2985 - With ValZev rtal]. ~
The foilowing traffic related improvements krould be required
by 1985 assuming Valley Mall develapment. This ana].ysis assumes:
(1) the improvements Iiste+d above have been implemented and; (2) na
southbaund 1 ef't turn entr wv~.l d be ~
y permitted to the mall driveway
an Sullxvan Rvad. These impravememts wauId provide adequate geak
hour capacity (Service Level C) for a13 roadways and intersectians
i.mpacted by project traffic.
i
Sullivan Raad
-Widen from faur to six travel Ianes fronn the I-50 sastbound
on-off ramp intersectian southerly througta the Sroadway intersection. ~
- Provide a second left-turn lane an the southlaound apprrach
to Broadway. 4ne of the through I anes could became the second
le#'t-turra Iane.
. ~
- Pravide a nvrthbcrund deceleration lane at the MalI driveway-
Broadway.
-Widen from twa ta four thrvugh trarrel lanes adjacent to the ~
praject site and provide left--turn Ianes at each MaIl driveway.
- Provide Ieft-turn lanes an both approaches to Sullivan Road.
10 _
~
190
' Linsrott, Law & Greenspan, 1nc., EngsnE~;_-rs
_ • I-90 Intercltange '
Pravide an extended leFt-turn lane on the nart}ibound
~
Sullivan Road appraach to the westbaund on raznp. Since this turn
_ Iane wvuld probably extend acrass the new averpass, the averpass
'slivuld be designed to allow enough width far twv through Ianes and
~
, the extended 1eft--turn lane, or alternately, sa lvcated that a
doiable Ieft turn to the on ramp cauld' be permitted.
- ,
Cankli.n,Road an F1~Qra _ Road '
~
- Widen to astaridard'twv 3ane roadway and provide adequate
shaul.ders between Sroadway and Sprague Avenue.
- FrvWide lei't-turn 3anes on the northbound apprvach to
Broadway and the southbvund approach ta Sprague Avenue.
Lxnibit 4 shvws imprvvements required ta mitigatQ operativnal
problems caused by Valley MaZI, traffic.
An alternate design has been proposed to allaw Teft-turn eiitrti-
to the project site frvm svuthbound Sullivan Raad. The existing
mazn entryway tv the Red Li.vn Inn (oppasite Mission Rvad) raauld
be changed t❑ a major driveway leading to the Va11ey Mall. Red
Livn Inn traffic wvuld then feed to and from this driveway. A
section af the Red Lion parking area sflutherly vf the main buiiding
wouTd have to be relocated in order to gravide roQm far the new
driveway. 5hould the design prove aceeptahle, a double left turn
would be needed on the svuthbound Suilivan Road apprvach ta the
Mission Raad/'Mall driveway intersection. 'I~wo lef't-turn lanes .
would then not be needed on the 'sauthbound Sull3van Road approach
to Broadway. This improvement,woul,d remove'a significant amount
vf project traffic f'ram the Sul,iivan Raad/Broadway intersectifln arid
frvm Broadway, though the xmprvvements recommended vn Brvadway -
, wauld still he needed.
,
- 1a -
191
~
~
~
. ~1r ~ ~ . `-,.~.~"~r"^~" ~
~
r ~
.q
/
. ~ '
_
- I
~ -
64A U~
~
192
.
Y~" ~ ~r:4+~-i~ ~ i ~i" i ~•41w - .rv' v-r' ~ R Y
~ ' . . ~ , P' 'T ~w~~`~"~'?';i,",Y~" . 3 ~ ~ 5 " ir F-= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y.., ~ ~ ~
{ SZ . ~f•°~i~ ~ "..~~t'PS~iF"t~`L6~'h , f3.~~ p~ t~7,'~.:'. r~ri0!°S"~ ~ :1.:~a ~ o ~ .y .s. ~ ~ ~
~ 6--~} ~
aw ~
f' ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~~e rC]
I• . bi t~ V i
' , r.~ "r' , : s~o,;;}r~~~Lri;•"~ ; .,k•:~,. ~ i ~ ~ •'R ~ ' ~ 4'
~ , h"` ~~I~''-~`.{;~N 4}'~,;Fd"~l:'ki.~~; ~:.'n' ~bo',¢~z,!'~°•.'ren~. w~_.,~i': ° ~ ~1 ~ ' .t. ~ ~ ` ; ; ` ~ ~
~ ~ ~f ~ F ~`r l1► i ~ ~ ~ - ~ 1.],~
~,.,a..~,_~ ,a ~ e,~s~ ~ I .r ~ ~ ' ~ . , , • 7►r '
1 r - r: .s~~~„t~ {1 r~s , 1~ l `
' • ~1k~."~- . ` ~'l.=f. ~ "~~i ~ ~ ~v~,~~y .+r ._i~'.•~ ~ _ M
~ • ~~j, ` t ~ ~`3 ; : ~ ~ fC"'~ ~ ~
• ~ ' S»" r< < ia4]' ' , ~ : '1 ' ~r• ~Y ' - ~ , ~ 1,~ ~I ~ ~ { ~
• '`l "~F~ f i ~ .~+5 ~ ^•e t~
~d ~,r , r' ~ j w:. ~ S~'~ ~S~'•• ~ ~
, l~ ~ ~p-^1~ y• _ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' " ~ `-K,r,. ~
T ~ ' ~ A~ . ~ ~ '~Pf~~~!' •
y•' p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F+ ~ ^:h F M +"'~r,
~'r ' ~ a,+` ~ ~ ~ ~a . ~ .a ; % ~
, . ~ :~'~s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r'~ ~~'.a~,•~~ ~ - { • -
~
A.
~ ~ ? E ' • ~ `4 ~
a I
~ 'ap ~
1
L>n;roit, ('retnspan, fnc., Encmr-er5
P
The traffic actialysis in this report provides ageneralizEd
improvement program tor the rvadways surrounda.ng the prp ject site. '
When all cvmponents af the prvject have been finala.zeti with regard
to type af establisliment and aperating hours, and definite driEre-
way locatians established, a more detazZed design can be done on
!
an intersection by iiztersectian basi.s. Hawever, irnprovements .
rEcvmniended in this report are adequate to provide agood Aevel of
traffic service vn the stz-eets surrounding the propoced E'alZey
Mall. ~
.
Canc].usions ,
1. The follawzng impravements will be needed an Sullivan Road
and Sroadway within the next four years even witliout Nfall I
development. These xmprovements wi.ll provide sui`ficiEnt
capaci.ty for the growth of existing on-street traffic.
a. Sullivan Rvad will have to he widened to faur traveT
lanes plus left-turn Zanes between Sprague Avenue and ~
the I-90 interchange.
b. The exi.stzng I-90 interchange will have ta be imprvx-ed
tfl prouide eather a secvnd overpass or a wider s3ngZe ~
averpass al.lawing Tvur travel lanes alang Sullivan Paad.
c. Signa].xzatian will be required at the 5u1].ivan Road
intersecti.ons with the I-90 eastbound and westbaui7d
on-afT ramps. 4
d. _ Broadway will probably Yiave to be widened .from two to
fvur lanes westerly vf Sul.livan Raad.
e. Signalizatzan wi1l probably be needed at the Mission r
Road/Sullivan Road intersection,
Each ai' the abvve improvements on Sullivan Road shauld be
completed by 1982 assuming federal funding is pravided for the
projects. 4
- 12 -
~ 4
, 194
~
Gir:c'I,Spnf7, lflC , rn
Ttie i'ollow•irzg arnpa,overnenf:s will he needcd wit}z LralZey Mali
detiTel-opment ta Pravide adequate roadway caPacaty on Sullivan
Rvad, Flora Road,, Corrklin Road, and Braadkay,
a. Sulliz-an Road will lyave tv be widet7ed from four to six
tlirnugh travel lanes betw•een the I-90 interchaiige and
Ba° oa dway .
b. A double left turn ] arie will be zieetled an soutlihauiid
Sullivan Road at the access point to Vallea. Aiall. 'n-tis
' paint will ea.tlier be at Broadk•ay or some desigiiated
location near ;'Iissivrt Road.
c. flrvadway will }iave to be widened fram two to .fviar
travel Tanes adjacent tv tlie site with left-turn lanes
pravzded at each drzvez,,ay entz-ance and ati cach anproach
t❑ SL11l1Vc1f7 RQad■
d. IIvth Flora Road and Coiiklin Road will have to he imProi-ed
, to adequate t►+Fo lane roadways titii'th wide shca~ilders ar
curb and gutter.
,
- 13 -
195
~
I
/
APPENQiX H
ExPANDED GROUND WATER REPDI4T
#
~
,
,
. ~1
1
~
1
#
1
,
196
~
EXPANDED GROUND WRTER REPOR7
Graund 4Jater Movement
Tne Spakane-Rathdrum aquffer extends frvm near 5pirit Lake and Pend
QreiIle Lake in Bonner and Kootenai Counties, Idaho, southwest across the
Rathdrum Prairie and dawn the Spokane ValTey thraugh the City of Spokane,
termi nati ng at the confl uence ❑f the Spokane River and the Li tt7 e Spokane
River. The aquifer is the primary source of drinking water for approximateTy
- 350,000 peQpi e i n an area whi ch i nc7 ude5 the citi es af 5pi ri t Lake, Athol,
- RatFrdrum, Flayden Lake, Coeur d'Alene and Pvst FalIs, Idaha and Spakane,
Washf ngton. The recharge zone i s that area through whi ch water enters or
cauld enter into the aquifer. Far- the Spakane-Rathdr^um aquifer the recharge
zone is the land area directly overlyfng and adjacent ta the aquifer a5
shawn on the following figure. There is an upstream headwaters area drainirrg
into the aquifer 'recharge zane which cantributes appraximately 90 percent of
the recharge f14w to the Spokane-Rathdrum aquifer. This streamfrtvw area
whi ch feeds the aqui fer covers an area af about 350 square mi les and is
shown in tlhe fal 7gwing figure. .
Geoloqyl
The Spokane Val l ey-Rathdrum Prai rie aqui fer as composed predvminantiy
of Quaternary gl aciafl uvi ai deposi ts whi ch extertd from Pend prei 1 i e Lake,
Idaho ta north of Sp4I{dnp, Washington. T'he depasi ts cons# st primari iy of
sand and gravel, fine tv caarse, and are pvoriy ta mvderately sorted, having
scattered cvbbles and baulders. The sand and gravel is reIatively free Qf
fine sand and silt, except in the uppennvst three tv five feet, where firre
grained material fill mast voids in the sand and gravel. Fn the Hiiiyard
trvugh, near the dawnstream end of the aqu7fer, the sediments 6ecome pro-
gressively finer toward the narth, where the aquifer is composed predominantly
of stratified sand but incZudes 5ame gravei and sflt arrd a few boulders.
In most ar=eas, the aquifer vverlies the semiconsolidated, fine grained
Latah formatinn af Mzvicene age. Tn some areas the aquifer has abrupt lateral
cantacts with sloping bedrack 5L11"faC2Ss but in other areas, it grades laterally
into less permeahle, Uncansvlidated materials which are not readily distin-
gufshable from the aquifer materfal. Tn such plaees, the selected boundaries
of the aquifer recharge area are svmewhat arbitrary.
The thicicness of the aquifer is not well estahlished. The best data
exist where two pismic Surve,ys have supp7emented availa6le drilling data. ~
The seismic data indicate a totai thickness of abput 400 feet of vncan-
sa2idated materiai near the idahv-Washington state line. 8ecause tne water
table is at a depth of ahvut 120 feet, the saturated thickness of the aquifer
is about 280 feet. In th~ Fliilyard trough, a test hole showed 78[~ feet of
uncor~solidated materials. R seismic interpretation °For tfae same area desig-
nated abvut 350 feet of these material as the saturated part of the aquifer
with aboUt 150 feet of unsaturated materiaTs abave the aquafer. A diagram
af the sei smi c pra'Fa d es f 5 shown in the foI 1 owi ng fi gure.
197
]95 i
1 AWiJ
4! ~ I frP A111C hr81l1L' r ~
Plcasant Prairir ~
A !
~ ~ ~ I ~ • f~ ~
~ unl Pia~ia k0
D
A
Pkg
w , ~S ai~
Bp k e' Ve l .
P ~ N~aJewlva~~ t •
I SIT'E I
~ ~ ~ ~ppw[un~[y
SPG1CAhf.1N7ERNA71i]dRL Gic•f1IO5i LWerty lake
I mK~~x
• ~ ~
Murun d'ralrsr
~ xv
e ~ o- 17
A[}[11i l,li HI.iIIARCI_ 11tt A
~F~,EV
L.n,ii~f+,~~rrr
r[1M1! 6111-1- l SOURCE U $ G$
i ~
dh Ab IMI ~ _ Ab
11MTfO STATFS OEPARTMgRyT OF TNE tNTERV(yR Prepere0 in Cappereuon wnh tne pGFJV-F7LE REPORT 77_$32
CiEQLapICAL SIJRVEF" ilJ$ ENVtRpNMENTAt PIiD7ECTiON At}E4+[CY pLp,TE I
aP171SN
LOLLMeIA nL.OERiA LL
I
Araa al map
WASMIpGTpN MONTAHS
. ~ d - n i
1
IQBNp ~
cas~o. . 9 u~ •
- ss
' -isr[a
a,
~ n ! T ~ \
Pr~c • ~ ,
Su.locr.ore. s,rs. Orr.~+~ ~ ~
~ a•rra o,. R~rE.
~ snol~~ o aio~s rp . °
p IS
V , °L a •
is r+.r . .L p;
~ J~l3 i
~
~ Fleflr►pd
o Lva~ ~i ~
: E ^
rw~
e° ~ ~
~SPOf(ANE Cos~. x~~ ~
d airne 20 "23 15 14
25
~ rYtl ,~r.n• 22 _
_ e 12
21 ~
.'.ia 27 26 13
' 75 s. !
_ a
~ 5 •
• M1556LILA 6 ~~ec'`•
' 4
3 .
ExPraTraTTOLI
, araYziage divide oi SpakBae River-
Ceeur d'Alerte I.ake easan. .`~2 i
e t
I3raxnaqe 3ivide ryf Che Pend preille
Lake Sss,n.
9UTTE
A 22 5urface-nrater data rollection site
aad nuraber.
.
I f Sl,akane Va13ey-fiathdnsm Prairse L!_j
'
aquifer. ~a •~a ao 3p ao So 6RUILES
9
wn~i~a•
'
[ei.ne
'n.~..,
I +,faa.9oPLA3'E 1.-- Map shvwing the pAr[s n[ it►e Spnkane River basin and
ihe Pend Oreille ftiver basin, `vash;ngtan. Idahv, and Ainntana,
sti'hfeh are recharge areas for the Spokane Vailey-Rathdrum
F'rairfe aquifer.
199
i
~
THIGKNESS `
AND SEISi'VTIC PRDF[LE QF : •
THE SPOKANE-RATHDRUM PRAi1tIE s
■ .
~
.
r~
s
~ ,~~5pirit'1,ake.
B3N-tiie~a•::.:::::-
a
:~.::i:::.;:::::~::•.:::
~ . . .
WASHINGT{}N i IDAHO AthoI
~
.~i
t
■
w
i
i
.
. E
aiico ~
•
. ■
~ Hauser =
, Newman Lake No L.ake
' • Rathdiurn ~
Navden Lakz
Rillyatd Ptafile P45t
- ~•~r: 4 FaIiS
t:. ~N: _ ,
-:;:.5palcane Cneur d Alene ~
~ •Val~ey; ■
~ pokane sc~te L;ne Projme
r • ■
■ ► a ~
t..., .w~'~`~ Liberty ~
~Nlaran Frairxe . Lake =
* Coeur ene ~
~ Lal:e
.
SI'ATE LIFYE 5EI5MIC PAUFILE c i HiLLYARD TRQUGii
a+ - rI a 5L•'IS,'vLiC PROFlLE #
~ 2000
Q _ i r Water Tabee z'O
~ I$01
= - '~x~•~r-• , . r"° ~ I ' ~ t r .
, ` • ~ ' , ::i :-~•:''4, '-1'` t i ~:^ey. : ~ ' ~ ~ '
m , , Glacf
~ Y' . ~ ~.~r. • L. s. al & ,
G!ac)a1
m IS~D ~ ~~~:r C ~:#..~sM-~-: ; lvaterTable`
Fl
uvial Deqo&1tS tr• .y ~n • - ~
1400 F ~ ~ ~ 4 :«:,"'~y • rnr•
~ Latat1 Formatlol
12001
~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
fODU • Grastfto Rock Granife Rock v - - ~
$00.
~ r~ 1 1 I I
~v a ,p Q v o ° ~ co 0
qo a
N p 8
~
❑fSYance in teet from indica;ed referente
~ SOURCE; Esvett & 5auron, Coasuleing E,e,,ra
~ HiErY)k1F1(- it'ItlH.}flt f1~,
i..uzr3i~ft~ii[s i r a ie u~~r7e~i~fst .fiildV~r. Nrii.ie.iiv'
s ru .„.nr.c ,
200
~
Hydraulic Characteristfcs4
The transmissivity of the aquifer (the rate at which water wi11 flaw
thraugh a unit width af the aquifer under aunit hydraulic gradient) is gen-
erally high. Values calculated by the U.S. GeolQgical Survey fur designated
parts of the aquifer are shown an the folrtawing figure. Transmi5sivitzes
caicu7ated hy the U.S.G.S. range frvm .73 Tillion ft~ per day in the western
end of the aquifer ta about 3.4 million ft per day near the Washington-Idahn
state Zane.
Calculated vaTues of ground water velocities are relatively high. U.S.G.S.
calculations fvr the aquifer at the state line indicated a veiocaty af about
64 feet per day. In an earlier study conducted by the U.S. Arrry Carps af
Engineers a different set af estimated aquifer characteri5tics vsulted in a
calcuZated velvcity of abaut 90 feet per day at the state line. Far the
Hillyard trough the U.S.G.S. caicu7ated average velocity is about 47 feet per
day. Fn the Corps af Engineers study, the velacity was calculated to be 41
feet per day. These vaiues are relative]y high fnr a graund water system and
indicate that the aquifer is a very dynamic system and ntit a reiatively stable
povl af water, The U.S.G.S. has calculated the rate of ground water flow Yn tne aquifer
tn be 960 and 350 cu4c feet per secvnd at the state iine and in the Hillyard
trough, respectively. Similar rates calcu7ated in the U.S. Rrmy Corp~ of
Engineers Study were I,000 and 200 evbic feet per second, respectiveiy. .
Water Levels .
The water tah1e in the aquifer slapes fram the Noodav Va11ey and Lake
Pend Drei]le, Fdaho to the DartfQrd area narth of-5pvkane, Wasnington. The
aquifer is at a maximum elevation af about 2,780 feet in narthern Idaho and
decZines to abaut 1,540 feet in the area narth of Spakane. The water tab7e
in the narthernmost part of the aquifer sZopes about 20 feet per mile af length,
while the,majar partian of the aquifer from narthern-idaha tv the southern
edge of the Hillyard trough sZapes relattve]y gently, from two to 10 feet per
miTe. The average annuaZ elevation af the water tab1e is shown in the figure '
that follaws. '
The water table contaurs shown an the above referenced figure refiect
the estimated annual average elevation. The water table at a particular Iuca-
tivn wiil vary seasonally with surface water runvff, precipitation and ather
climat7c factors. Water level fluctuations are generaily less than 15 feet
during a year in most areas. Generally the greatest annuai fluctuativns occur
' fn thvse we17s nearest ta the 5pokane River or near the margin of the aqulfer.
Water levelfluctuations from a wel] lvcated in the, vicinity of the project
site are shawn ❑n the fallowing hydrograph.
The depth ta the water ta6Ze is the greatest zn narthern Tdaha, abvut
300 tq 400 f2et belaw the land surface, and hecomes gradualiy shallawer down-
stream, reaching depths ❑f about 120 feet at the Washington-Idaho state Tine
and abvut 40 feet near Spvkane. Cantinuing dawnstream the depth to the water
tab7e increases to abvut 154 feet in the Hillyard tr❑ugh.$ In the vicinity
❑f the project site the dept~ t❑ the water tahle ranges from about 100 tv 120
feet below the 3and surface.
201
- ~V~ i~ y •~I~C:ELt ~ Peona ~ee ~ ~
toB
4Ecenrn
US 375
Ha..ino e eo Trammimiruy (fttiAay)
CnuiH1'y llcs ,Areru
SCven hl~le ~ Se ralue lurdryiguafcsl pa, nf
Nve ►file Yrairie ~ !Ae tquifcr Cekulslcd 6y rnmpulcr
~ 't* 2 S; III6 -ilk- °md'4 desiPed hy J.V. 1r2cy, IJS
C~lopca7 $urxey, hased on tuIculalni
16 fluw rales unJ waiePtaLk gndianes.
ax I
A/~ ~ ~SnP . ,
V '~intlf Aw
C~
i ~
a a ° E
4~' g
WsN. az.. f-r • viuu
m _ " ° - -
~ S~JK N ¢a~+~
FQL1 ~'w~y y~r~V s+o ,S°
AhllwooJ
- re, ti l
['~irkw~i[er c~ Y<<~ I--
~ T,a.C A.V . 2.07:
I ~ 8, o.,r a Sfn + 70
jg ~ ! .
a I
s~.~o,~e a f LL ~ a❑isliiir.i~{ f s~ a~~~ H.~ ~;.•r.~Jrl~
iqn • - . ~ ~
x
c' x
C
s
Piih %\F lN f! RY.ti f1pNAR j •
~IHF(3kT m f'~y~ [l~i~i~ FSl~lil}• ~ :f
O S9cn R.r
~~~sll[[riG J ~qArs
~f i~ • I~ ~ i3lfn A-
N
~'a n Are ~ I
~o\F. tSILF ~
111.1,K;Y..r~ A¢UIFER TRAN5All5S1ViTY flfSTNli3lfTltliY
Ak ~i t aL i gh Ab a ~ r r
llater Levei Fluctuations in lleli 25/44-2301. 1931-11
$0
. $5
go
95 -
100
1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1931 1938 1939
75 , 80 , .
,
~ 85
~ 30 - •~.f--
a
95 '
° 100
d 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
-1y 75 rY 1 ~ i , I S
~ so _ ~ -
m 85',~'
~ y 5.~ 4J
~ 90
-
~
z 95 ' -
~ 1oo
~ 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 195+6 1457,1958
~ 75
p d
° 80 - "
r ~ -
r 85 A
a
Q 91~ - ~ ~
v -
~
95 - -
100 . , . . i 1 .
1959 1957 1951'1962 1963 1954 1955 1966 1957 1468
715 1 • 1 • Y 1 R 80 -1
85 -
1 ~
~
90
95 - 100 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
Well number: 25J44-23QT;
Depth 97 ft ; Water use• lrrigation.
203
4
e
The praject site is located near the mainstream of the aquifer where
the transmissivity and fiow of the aquifer are highest. While it is not
anticipated that the prapased project will have any perceptibZe zmpact an the
geoTogy or trydralvgy of the aquifer, the exysting hydrology of the aquifer near
the pr4ject site wial haae a bearing ❑n the patentaaZ for water qua.lity degrada- 4
tion fram project related effi'uent5.
Water fiiow
The !J . 5. G. 5. has cai cui ated the rate of ground water fl ow i n the aqui - #
fer ta be 960 ar~d 350 cubic feet per secvnd at the state line and in the
HilZyard trvugh, respectively. Similar rates calculated in the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers Study were I,000 and 200 cubic feet per second, respective-
ly.
Recharge ta and Di scharqe fram the Aqui fedo ~
The aquifer is recharged 6y percolation of surface water runnff and
underflaw from adjacent highlands, by percolation of precipitatian, by
seepage from the Spokane River, 6y seepage from lakes whicn lie adjacent
ta the aquifer, and ay perca'[atifln of irrigativn water diverted from sur-
face water sources. The fvllawing ffgure and tabie snaw the lacativns and '
rate of recharge to and dfscharge frvm the aquzfer as estimated by the
U. 5. G. 5. usi ng the resui ts frorn a ncamber of pri ar studi+es.
In the hi ghlands and Ill llS Wh1 CFi llE adjacent ta the aqui fer, preci pi -
tation praduces small streams which Zase mast of their water to infiZtration
as they flaw only short distances across tne land area above the aquifer. ~
Some surface recharge probably occurs in the area south of the project site
at the sink area where Piouf Creek disappears. Coeur d'Aiene, Pend Oreille,
SpZrit, Twin, Hayden, Hauser, Newrnan and Liberty Lakes are ail ad,jacent ta
the aquifer. Part of the water that flaws 7ntn these lakes is evapor-
trartspired, daverted, increases storage vr becomes 5u1^fdCe oUtflOW' and part
percoiates into the ground and recharges the aquifcr. The average inflaw to ~
the aqui fer from tf~ese ad joi nz ng areas totai s abawt 1,010 cubi c~Feet per
second, with about 800 cubic #'eet per second an Idaha and abaut 210 cuhic
feet per second in WaShington. [Yirect recharg from precipitatior~ has been
calculated tv he 130 ft31s far ldaha and 50 #'t~Is far Washington. These
amounts represent that part of the precipitation wnich is not last as surface
runoff or as evapotranspiratian and is therefore avaiiable for recharge to ~
the aqudfer. Ttte aquifer receives an average of about 80 ft31s fram the
SRokane R3ver betweerr Post Fa11s, Idahv and Greenacres, Washingtan. Addi-
tional recharge came5 frvm the Spakane Rzver near Post Fa17s, Idaha where
a6vut 1oQ ft3/s is diverted frvm the river and used far irrigation. Zt as
estimated that abvut one-ha1f of this amount rlcharges the aquifer. The
abave estimates giwe a tvtal of about 1,320 ft Is. ;
The aquifer lvses +water tv the 5pokane and Little 5pokane Rivers at arr
average rat~ of abou°t 1,090 ft3Is, An additi onal ground water 4Gt'Flf1W of
about 55 ft Is occtars at the dawnstream end of the aquifer near Nine Mile
F'alls, Washington. Water use accvunts for most of the remainder of grvurrd
water dTSCharge. Approximate7y 62 cfs of water in Washington and 2 cfs of ~
water a fl Idaho are pumped fram the aqui fer and eventually di schargea to the
Spokane Rfver through municipal sewer systems. In addltion, large quantities
~
204
4nn~ud+r.urr \ ~
4 Uis~flnw ~
py ' y~ - auu LEGENn ,
Rtl OumEeRk v4k fsal pv mpaoA
- 3 i0 f~ f Fl~+.~ €~w aQUU~r f~ma.aydd~y ua '
tl
M~ 3oea.n. ra~. w ~ t ~aqrap w me.g.dhr
+ 5 - 0Iecrcuy[a Gwn Ehc.ywru ~ .
cxx w~F ~
HSC *111e
L+18 won. Re Yw+9weo 1Aiuuph ihe&patans aad
Fkrc hlilr i'r3rrce ■
Ylxas~nt Proirie uiw s~w w.,~.
,F- W-Iharm Pe i ~
irn Afik~ Totnf Puniqing Lnsn
a in tiVashin tun +dS
~ -120 -1~4 _ I
~ I ~ .5
~ ~ ~
S. ~ ~ I
Alarpn P
~ ~ .ww.~ ~wr aa ~ ~
~ f..~z,~a.. \~la~,._~~-•~'`~_._m -
d ~
~ ~ ~ ! ~ +11 x A
+ 9 - 330
ia P 6 t Ttentwood I H
O 5~'k n~~ ~r~. q { + a 0
+go QEis Orc9ards
t 2
q~ } 5 I
230 ep V 1
•
~ e.d~.~. . ao + ia
_ 5a.~. A.. ~i. nt„mn ~
_ + I s>„w 51T
+ r '
° Uppor[unuy
I~
~ o § Veradaln d 2A ,i
a ~
26tn~ R ~ ~[CCI~11i7119R a (jb
' ~y 1SkE
1t.ipnr
SI`6►AAk 9\TlR1~Al90\AG ~ ~'~Ril6 ifi • ~1 + ~ ►
~ wiRPuRT~ ~ ~°~,ro L•rapa[rumpir9[ion o ~
~ - I + sn ~
~
~ y' ~ Muran Yrairie .
~ 4e
J$'~ . AQUIFi:R 131Sf:11ARCr/RECIIARCE RATC$
Nl
~ HiliY~kl7d h :r"r.'kn[lA', 7.l[. .wic~niirr
L~~iESi~lr~irrs n~iraf a~r~iyFis, plJi~ui~~k ~ ~ Itt~k Rfl4L' SDURCC' l1 5 G S
~
EssIMATED avERa~E RArES oF
RECHARGE TO AiVD DISCHARGE FRaM
THE AQUIFER
4
Cubic Feet Per Second
Subtvtal TotaT
RECNARGE
F7ow into aquifer from adjaining areas +1,010 4
Idah❑ +g0p
Washington f210
Precipitatian minus evapotranspiratian
an the land surface above the aquifer + 180
Idaho +130 ,
Washi ngton + 50
Seepage from 5pokane River hetween Post Falls,
Tdaha, and Greenacres, Washington + 80
Infiow from surface-water diversion
(recharge hy water diverted frorn Spvkane River
east af Post Falls, Idaha, and applied ta land 4
surface above aquifer) + 50
TO7AL RECNARGE +1,320
DISCHARGE 4
Seepage ta Spakane River _ 780
Greenacres ta Trent, Washington -330
Trent to Spvkane, Washingtorru _230
Spokane tv Seven 'N# 1 e Bridge, Washi ngton -i 2q
5everr-Mi 1 e Sri dge to Ni ne-Mi le Sri dge, 4
Washington -100
Seepage tv Litt]e Spokane River between Dartford
and abaut 3 mi 1 es above its mout'h - 310
Total pumping ]ass in Washington - 127
Ground water pumped from aquifer and
discharged to Spofcarte RiVer and Peone' Creek - 52 4
Corrsumptive use of ground water {water
pumped from aquifer and removed by
evapatranspiratian - 65
Tvtal pumping lass in Idahv _ 48 ,
Ground water pumped from aquifer and discharged tn Spakane R#ver _ z ~
Cvnsumptive use af graund wat@r (water pumped
fram aquifer and removed byevapatranspirat#on) - 46
Ground wa'ter outfl ow 6e1 aw Ni ne-Mi Z e Fal1 s - 55
TOTAL QISCNARGE -1,320
CNANGE TN STORAGE p i
Source: Unated States Geotvgical Svrvey (1978).
!
, 206
of water are pumped fram the aquifer and applied as irrigation water ❑n the
iand surface or are discharged to cesspools or drain fieTds, after domestic
vr industrial use, where patentiaily part of the water returns, by infzltra-
t7on' tU the aquifer.
irrigation Use of ground water averages about 37 ft3ls in Washington and
51 ft Is in Idaho. Assumfng a consumptive-use factQr of 0.67, a tatal of 21
ft3/5 in Washingtvn and 41 ft3/s in Idaho are lvst from the aquifer. Ulater
, pumped frnm the aquifer and discharged tn ces~Roa3s or drain fields, or used
for domestic irrigation, averages about 74 ft Is Tn Washington and 9ft31s in
IdahQ. Using a consumptive use factor of 0.59, as calculated by Todd {U.5.
Army CorpS of Engineer~, 1976}, total lass fram the aquifer is about 44 ft3ls
an 3 Washington and 5ft Is an ~daha. These various pumping 1osses tatal 127
ft Is in Washingtvn and 4$ ft /s in Idaho, fvr atotal pumping Zass of 175 ft31s.
The ahnve e5timate5 give an average rate of discharge of about 1,320 cf5.
This is equal ta the estimated average recharge rate. 6ecause nv lQng-term
change in storage within the aquifer has been abserved within the past 50 year5,
based an water table flucuations; it is assumed that a state of near equilibrium
ex7sts in the aquifer. Patentiai Recharqe fram 5ewage aisposal 5.ystem Drainfields
As discussed ahvve, based an U.S.G.S. estimates 74 cfs in l-dashington and
9 cfs in Idaho is pumped fr-om the aquifer and vsed for sewage disposal in
drainfields ar far damestic irrigation. Using a cgnsumptive use factar of .59 •
as caicuiated by Tvdd in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers study, a tvtal of 30
cfs in Washington and 4cfs in Tdaha wvuld he ava7lable for recharge to the
aquifer. Of the 30 cfs in Washington, about two-thirds ar 20 cfs is the refplt
of dvmest#c irrigatian, ]eaving abaut 30 cfs the result of sewage dispasal.
If ail of tne abvve where t❑ in fact recharge the aquifer it wauld cvnstitute
approximately three percent of the totai valume of water which recharges the
aquifer. The ]iterature to date continues to show a cvnflict over the probahiTity
of drainf#elds a5 an aquifer recharge source. Rtest dridlzng program was
conducted by J. 14. Crosby of Washingtan State vniversity from 7967 through
1970, to evaluate g^gund water and pollutant mvvement from various sources in
the Spokane Va11ey. He faund the soil tv have a low natural moisture con-
tent coup2ed with apparent high mvisture tensions. These results Ied him to
suggest that 5ai3 maisture was not movfng downward to the graund water table.
In the finaZ report ❑f th~ results of the drilling program, Crosby states as a
conclusion of the study: Further study of the maisture coriditions in the 5pvkane autwash
graveTs has strengthened the earlier concius7an (Crvsby, et ai
1968) that these depasits are generaZly 3n ahighly stressed ,
_ moisture cQnditfon. Grvund water recharge cannvt he aemonstrated
as ❑ccurring an r-esponse tv precipitat7on. Instead, it is sug-
gested that recharge zs associated,primariiy with marginal streams
that discharge vnta the autwash plain mafntaining saturated condi-
tions'in the gravels for extenaed periads of time. Precipitatfan
is stored zn the upper strata and apparently remvved during the
growing 5ed50RS. Qominant moisture movement fs probabIy'in response
to capillary and thermal gradients.
207
i
,
Fur^ther vn i n hi s concl usians„ Crosby states :
These writers pastuTate that drainfield waters may in the early 4
stages of fie1d use percalate tv depth. Hnwever, as ar anic
matters are formed a5 described by McMichaei arid McKee ~1956),
Buter, et. al. (1954) and Calwell (1938) further deep percv-
lation is arrested and moisture mavement is predominantly
Iateral Tn respanse to capillar,y forces. The initial moisture 41
at depth is rapidly dissipated as equiiibrium is reestablished -
with the surrounding media.
The investigations of Cros6y,et, al., have been criticized on the basis
that the samples fram the dr7lling program were only taken during the summer
months when the rate of moisture remaval by evapotranspiration wauld be the 4
highest. In additivn the Cr^asby studies reported na 5ignificant salt huild-
up in the soi7 beneath drainfieids, which cvuld sugget"4t that at some time of
the year any salt accumuiatioros are flu5hed dpwnward. Crasby attributes
the low soil nitrate levels to denitrification at depth. The maisture
deficit in the saii with a lack of salt huildup appears to he contradactory
regarding the ultimate fate of the drainfieid effluent. 4
In 1976, a repart on the water resources of the metr° o2itan Spokane
region was comp7eted by the U.S. Rrm,y Cvrps of Engineers This study fn-
cluded an analyt7 cal investi gati vn by Todd of the drai nfi eld percalatf an
mechanism to determine if this efflGEnt cvuld be reach7ng the graund water.
The purpase of the iravestigatian was tn determine from calculatinns of the ~
evapotranspiratian mechanism whether moisture is available for percnlatiank
under subur6an develvpment cvnditions after evapatranspiratian needs are
satisfied. 1'add came ta the fo17owing canclusian 6ased on the results of
the study:
An analysis of the evapotransgi rataon mechani sm for urban and r
suburhan land use conditivns in the Spakane Uaile.y indicates
that a szgnificant proportion of the leachate from septic tank
drainfieids, is avazlable for percolatTOn to the water table of
the ground water. Tne analy5is of soil maisture behavior is
hased vn a cvnservatave interpretation ❑f data and a Conserva-
tive applfcation of svi1 moisture transport technalugy. Not- y
wi thstandi ng the conservati ve appraach, the anaiyti cal results
indicate anet 5urplus of Zeachate availahie for percoiation ta
graundwater.
A monthly water balance for the Spokane Valley under generalized suhurban
cQnditfans (assuming an averall grass dens7ty of three residential units #
per acre) develaped far the ahave study is included in the faiivwing table.
Th7s water balance indicates that surpius water vver and ahave potential
evapotranspiration is available fram November thraugh Apr^ii. 1'he tQtal
average annuai surp3us was @5t7R18t@d t0 be 14.22 inches, and coRStitutes
41 percent of the totaZ precipitation plus draznfield effluent.
1
The prel iminary results of the ongoi Rg "208°" Vlater Qual i ty Management
program for the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer, being conducted by Spokane Cvunty
i
I
208
MaNTHLY WATER SALANCE OATA FOR 5P41CANE VALLEY UNaER GENERALIZED SUBURBAN CONnITIDNS
i F m R m i J R S +D N D YR.
PrecipitatiQn 3.15 2.44 1.70 1.10 1.83 1.44 .52 .65 .91 1.74 2.40 2.52 20.00
5eptic Tank
Effluent, in. 7.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 14.28
Pntential -
Evapotrarispi ra-
tinn, in. 0 Q 0.61 J,71 3.14 4.38 5,61 4.78 3.15 1.67 0.46 - 0 25.51
Actual Evapo- trarrspi rati on,
irr. 0 0 0.61 1.71 3.14 4.10 3.55 2.85 2.26 1.67 0.46 0 20.35
Moi sture
CD Qeficit, in. U ~0 0 D 0 Q 0.28 2.06 1.93 0.89 fl 0 5.16
~
So11 Mai sture
5torage, an. 5.04 5.00 5.00 5.00 4,88 3.41 1.55 0.85 0.69 3.95 5.00 5.00 -
Snvw Pack
Mai sture
Starage, in. 3.15 0 0 0 0 D Q D€} 0 0 Q 3.15
Total .
Percalatian,
in. 4.34 3.23 2.28 0.58 Q 0 0 U 0 0 0.08 3.71 14.22
5ource: - U.S. Arrmy Cvrps of Engineers Study .
~
~
i n caoperati on wi th the !1. S.G , S. , Ll . 5. Envi ranmental Protecti an Agency and
the tdashingtvn 5tate aepartment of Ecviogy, have not provided any defini- ~
tive conel usi ans to date r^egarding patent# al recharge of the aquifer by drain-
field effluents. Preliminary ground water quality data from the 5pvkane
County "208" Study and the U.S.G.S. are conflicting as to the passibility of
sewage treatment systems effIuent as a source of ground water reeharge, and
are d-iscussed in more detaia in the section an ground water quality beTow.
6ecause of the ►rery sma77 quantit,y of tatai sewage system effluent compared 4
ta the total aquifer flow rate it is lfkely that effects on the chemical
qraality of the graund water would be difficult to identify. Todd used data
indicating an increase in tvtai dissalved 5alids as the ground water fZows
westward under the areas served by septic tanEcs as confirmatiara of his cai-
cu7ations shawfng recharge as probable. The preliminary data from the Spokane
Covnty "208" Study and the U.S.G.S. dQes show a slight increase in salt con- !
tent of the ground water as it passes under the Spokane Valiey. However, a
much iarger increase in salt content appears to occur as the aquifer passes
under the City of Spvkane and the area to the north. Crasb.y has suggested
that the increase fn nztrate and chioride ieuels as the aqu#fer flows westerly
is due 19 "natura7 hydrageological prvicesses and nvt to seepage from septic
tanks". !
Prel i minary d,ata a1 so i ndi cates that some areas near the margi n of the
aquifer have hfgher salt concentrations than dves the main body of the aquifer.
Because of the iflwer fZow rates and lack ❑f mixing near the margin the effect
of surface recharge on graund water quality may be more easTiy identiffed.
The higher saTt concentratians near the margin may be the resuit of surface ~
runOff frvm the adjoining hiiis or surface recharge from the area a6ove the
aquf fer.
Water f]se
Estimated valumes of water pumped frvm the aquifer in 1916 hy public ~
water suppTy for domestic, irrigation and indu5tr#al purposes are shown on
the following ffgure. These eWmates are derived from the U.S.G.S. surrmary
of data from prevfous 5tudies.
Public water supply systems pumped a tatai of about 30 billzon gallons
(128 ft3ts) ❑f water from the aquifer in 1976 far domestic use. The major ~
part of the water (a6out 27.5 h7I 1 i an ga1l ans ) was ptamped i nWashington, AI i
pubiicly 5upplied water used for^ domestic purposes by the popu7ation over-
lying the aquifer +was abtaaned from the aqv7fer, except fvr a very smalZ por-
tian (less than ane percent of the totaZ damestTC use) which was obtained
from Hayden Lake, Idaha, WeZ 1 s are presently bei ng constructed whi ch wi 1l ~
replace thi ssurface water suppiy wi th additi anai wi ttrdrawa] s from the aqui fer.
i`he majar public water supply systems are listed in the attached table.
An addi t1 QCldl 22 bi 1 iian ga31 ans (92 ft3/s ) of water was pumped fram
the aquifer in 1975 far irrigation'and almost five billivn gallons (19
ft3/2) for industrial uses. Div~rted from the Spakar~e River in 1976 were ~
about 24 bi1iivn gallar~s (I00 ft Is) far irriyation (near post Falis, Idahv)
and IQ 6fiZivn galians (42 ft3']5) for industria7 use (Kaiser-Trentwaod
caaiing prvicesses). Virtually all the water diverted by Kaiser-Trentwood
fs returned directly to the river.
210
1
Sua¢aazy o! Fublic waiar-gsippiy aysiema ohGaining rratar lrpm [hr aquaEer
Wetct yusSity
Lrca[lpn Approx- Apprex- Num- = Preaent
of lmatc iicaea her Chemacal atandarda rater
H~me ol waear systeml ~el~s pnpu• vatEr uae o! Stanrlard■ NumCer treee-
latlvn in 1976 eemplae excepdcd af inent
•erred ;millipn■ teaCad2 R1ma■
1n 1975 of excrsded
gallpnal
Ci[y nf Sgokene 2S/41-3 186,000 13,800 35 Iraa 1 Chlbsx-
25/43-4.8,11 aaCiaa
15/43-31
ucaern elecsric olater Campnny 75/84-0,15,16, 15,700 1,760 51 Iron 5
17,21,21, 27 danqsnece 1 Nane
Osaaalved salld■ 1
C7Ly oE Coeur d' Aleno 51/4-1,3,12 21,1000 1,400 Ghiern-
MtidSl
srnit+rorch lPaeer Uiecrict nZ 16/41-7,19,70, 16,090 979 1: Eron L None
30
Fairchi3d A,ar ?occe Haaa i5/43-11 14,D0G 727 51 It6n 1 Chlflri-
Vets trrigetion Oxairice 4l15 25/44-13,15,72, 12,000 593 37 ;rpn 1 naelcn
73,36 Mitrate 7 BDna
xaahsaqton 'Nater Pawer 02 25/44-70,77.28, 7,496 590 ZD Iran ]
, 29 Coppos 1 Chlpri-
Lead 1 naeipn
s,uiah►Aqton vn[er puwar al 25J43+13,73 41800 363 50 Iran 5 Chlorn-
25043-7,1B pRenpls i natloa
Fbdel Irsfqacioa Dastrnce w!8 25/44-21, 28 4,609 82 S tran k None
City ot A.pc Falla 50/5-1 4,500 631 None
Waahsngtw. 53etor Psswer R3A Z6/43-19, 20, 7d 4.500 273 9 Ttosl 1 Chlory- -
areltard Arannuu ;rrzgatcon 6satract :5f43-12 4,560 la2 74 'Nanqaaaae natian
1
#5 2',144-7 Phcnal• 1 8ona
Carnhnpa Israqassan Listrxct 97 25i43-2; 4.200 706 1 HQn9 0 None
ZsenCwaSd ErrsgaGaon D1eCr:c;c 03 25/44-2,3 3,600 427 9 Iron 1 None
7b/4a-3S
alereh Spckane YrriqasSon Dlateicc 25/43-17,70 2,800 194 5 None a None
"b
East Spot,ane rra[er DLetrlck 161 25/43-24 2,900 151 72 Tron 5 None
CansuliSataA Trrsgatlpn psa[riee 75/44-17 2,700 134 a tlpne ❑ gpna
1l19 SCieenacreay
Waahirfqtan Itrepr 8ovvr s39 26/43-6,10 2.400 203 6 droa 1
wngan+sse 1 None
nosa Aa3nt 7leaaciac,nn 51/5-35,36 2,200 I56
[wtch>qeon Trrsgacion Dzstaaci nI5 25/44-18 2,000 181 3 Hona 0 gp~
Consolidatea Irr:gatioa IIaa[rxci 75/65-3,B ZsOQFA 1GD 19 Irwf 1 gpna
00 (Carban]
Saardnns Park Irrigatioa DioErie; 25/44-5,6 3,000 32 7 fipne p None
017
ixwln raeor 13satriei pb 25/44-4,9 1,e00 406 5 Nnne n None
Toem oe eullwood 25/46+5,7,8 1,000 36 6 None D None
Conaalida[ed Irr:gatiaa G3¢szSci 26/66-31 1,500 72 19 Iron 2
MSY (Eaat Faiata) markqanog. I
Caasalidated I[iiya[yGn 177e.sset 25/45-2 1,700 65 T Npna 0 #pIyQ
M19 (6sxs OraFurds)
Cicy vE arehdrua 52/4-31 k,CDa 161 Yiirace 2 Llane
Aasm Villa Bstsiea 50/4-6 1,000 GO " None
Daahmaa wricer CamEany 75]44.-19 1,000 36 3 !lprtg p Rone
Con¢wiidseed zrriyacinn ofacracc ' 25/45-7 Biu 43 3 iroa 1 geae
tlly Iwaa[ 8armn]
Cssy af. Sparac La1c 53/4-6 700 56 " ganQ
Fasc Craenscret 51[5-2H 606 38 gp"
Hauyar Lake 51l3-19 BQO 40 r N~*
CoauulidaCa3 It[igOiYph uSsLSlss 25I44=11 5I0 73 2 O brane
+115 lCardesy
City of A¢hot 53/3+9 330 SQ None
xaEfmass water 50/4-1 300 'IU efana
lia;•9an Ptnes 51j4-I3 x= • 13 ~ Ma[ur
Lil~rty Lek" T]txliciea Cp. 2Sl43t14,15 - 34U 13 17 Iron _ tipne
Psna [+iew 6atak+aa 51/6-1Z 200 13 " None
lferma Treilar [xurt 51/4-91 Lsa 10 .s yQne
reo,+h xrriqatiom aiserict 410 26/45-25 140 7 4 ;fton L None
Fanhsndle Mab1Pe Fsiet4e 5=/4-2$ 17$ @ mCne
Mwntain Vlew 51/4r14 125 B Haae
Sun llir 14bile g114-11 lUV 7 Hana
CounGry LSnt[a4 52/4-27 100 T Haae
Heueeer 50/4-4 10R 7 Hane
Rivilla xater Carpesaeion 76/43-6 97 5 6 None 0 8ane
14oLrasd 'KatrX 52/8-5 50 2 " [ianr
Bunco P48d 1laker 43/3-17 40 2 " " None
Pleasent Prairie xeteY Company 26J44-37 34 S 1 N!lrate S None
PinecrvFt nabile eocc Park 25/44r4 " " Chlari-
nativn
HfdCan Vf11age Eatates 52/4-22 Hone
upper 'lti+in LaRea 5I/5-36 Pnns
Cj":ald Hsutea 31A'4-12 SvbCi+fieiQn noe yet campletad Hans
Carmvelle Cvtpvtailan 5I/4-21 Svbdiviafan yet somple[ed Ncn~
1 R!er adA1C[vnel amll aya[mea pcabebly exye- tRat sre nwt inclvded in th+r 6aaic da[s.
xilau net evailshle Eer Tdaho,
3 Cha'mIc4I atand3cda are erpSained an plete 10.
` 211
.
Praject Water Consumptivn ~
The proposed project wi2l resu7t in the withdrawal of abaut 18
milli4n gaiZons (2.3 million cubic feet) of water annualiy #'rnm the aquifer
for damestie, sewage disposaI and irrigativn purposes. Of this tvtal, ap-
praximately 12.3 million ga7ians {1.6 million cubic feet} per year wauld ~
be used for sewage dispvsad and ultimateTy discharged to a drainfield abave
the aquifer.
The anticipated water cnrnsumptior+ by this praject repr^esents a very
small percentage of the tatai flvw frnm the aquifer and pvses na threat to
existing supplies. The presernt grQUnd water fivw i5 capahle of serving ~
more than dauble the papulatian naw being served.
A portion of the above water consumption may be aaai7able for recharge
ta the graund water system. llsing a consumptive use factor of .59, as
devel4ped by Tadd, 41 percent of the tatal water consumed wauZd be avaiTab3e
for percvlatian inta the ground water system. 7h7s wau7d represent a tatal ~
of .9 million cubic feet per year, of which .7 mfllion cubic feet per year
would he from sewage dzsposaT systems. If this entare atnaunt of water
were ta perco]ate inta the ground water it would represent less than ane-
tertth of one percent of the totaT flow of the aquifer.
. It is nvt anticipated, hased vn the above, that the prvposed prajeet 4
will have any perceptible effect on the quantity of ground water. The
pvssibility of grourrd water quaiit,y degradation as the result ❑f percola-
ti an of sewage treatment system effl uent i s CII5CUS5Ed i n the secti 4ns vn
grvund wa'ter quality and sewage treatment.
Ground Water Quality ~
Pursuant to section 1424(e) of the 5afe Drinking water ActI$ the
Federa] EnviranmentaT Protection Rgency (EPA) has designated the Spokane-
Rathdrum aquffer as the sole vr principaT saurce of drinking water for
appraximately 338,000 people i n a Portivrr of northern idaha and eastern
Washington. The designated "sale source" area inciudes the aquifer recharge ~
and str^eamfZnw areas shvwn above. The sole source des3gnation r the
aquifer was based upvn the follvwing determinatians by the EPA:
1. The 5pakane Val l ey-Rathdrvm Prairi e Aqui fer is the
"sole svurce" of high quality drinking water for over
338,000 people 3nc7uding cities and towns and people ~
using individuai weZls, Current water supply treatment
praetice is limited to minimal disinfection ftir some
5ystems and no treatment for other systems far drinking
pl1rpD5e5, and there is no aTternatzve source of drinking
water 5uppZy which couid economicaily repZace the Spakane
Va1ley-Rathdrum Prairie Aqvifer. ~
2. The Aqu i fer i s vul rrerabi e tv coratamf nati on through
its recharge zone primarily becaUSe the glaciated sai7s
which are hYghly per4neah1e. There 7s evidence of ]o-
caiized contamination from industrial saurces and septic
. I
212
tanks. 5ince contaminativn ❑f a ground water aquifer
can he daff7cult ❑r impossibTe to reverse, contamination
of the 5pakane Vatley-Rathdrum Prairie Aqu#fer cvuid pose
a significant hazard to those peopie dependent on the
aqGifer for drinking purposes.
The so]e source designativn wilt requfre projects which receive FederaI
financaal ass#stance and have a potential for pallutzng the aquifer be
SubJeCt tQ a speciai EPA pre-con5tructivn review. The basis far the review
is whether or not the risk of contamination of the aquifer created by the
propvsed~rvject is sufficfent to create a°significant hazard ta public
hea7 th .2Water Quality Standards •
FederaT 5tandards far drirrkirrg water qua7 i ty have been estab7 i shed
by the EPA. The fallowing table shaws the max7mum allowable contaminant
Ievei {primary 5tqndard} and the praposed secandary standard for each po-
tential water quality cantaminant. The primary standard establishes the
maximun allawabTe contaminant level far chemical cvnstituents of drinking
water which may affect the health of cansumers. The secondary standards
are only guidelines and dea] with the aesthetic qualities of drinking water.
' The inorganic canstituent of pr#mary cvncern in the aquifer is nitrateS.
Excessive concentrations of nitrate in dr7nking water prvduce a bitter
ta5te dnd Tiiay cdll5@ ph,y5Zol0g7Cdl d15tT'eSS. ThE n~trdt@ lAn ha5 alSd bEElZ
impl i cated in the vccurrence of inethelagdabmena (i, e. ,"81u e Baby" syndrome) .
Heavy metai such as lead, copper, mercury and cadmium can be taxic in
excessive eancentrativns.
Phvsfcal and Inarqanic Chemicai Characteristics
The avai lable water quai 7 ty data i nd3 cate that the aqui fer general1y
yie1ds water of excelierrt quaTity. R surunary of the chemical quality of
the water from the aquifer i-s inclUded in the follawznq table. On7y thase
canstituents for^ which a federaT primary or secandary standard have heen
established are included in the table. This tahl e r+epresents a surnmary ❑f
ahaut 9,600 analyses frvm 400 graund water sites located throughout the aquifer.
(Z) Contaminant i.euels in E7CCe55 of Drinking Water Standards
The maximum contaminant Ievel of five of the elEVen characteristics fvr
which aprinary water qua7ity standard has been e5$dbl'15hed (those that may
affect the health of cvnsumers) have been exceeaed in a smai7 number ❑f
samples frnm the aquifer. The maxfmum contaminant ievel of barium, cadmfum,
mercury, SeTen7un' ckrr^omium and silver were never exceeded. Flvuride,
nitrate, turbidity, arsenic and lead maximum contaminant ]eveTs were exeeeded
in a total of 16 analyses, which cnnstitutes less than ane-ha]f of orte
percent of the analyses far these constituents.
The recommended Ievels of S of the,TO characteristics included in the
prapased secvndary levcls, which dea7 with those characteristics that may
affect the aesthetic quality of water, have been exceeded in a smali numher
of samples from the aquifer. The recomnended leve15 of sulfate and foaming
213
WATER QUAi.ITY STANDAR05 ~
Chemical Standards
~~[axi mum Proposed
~onstituent I~ Cvntaminint Secondary
LEVEI+ LEW@l2
TY'on 0.3 mg/L
Mdllgdtle5e 0.05 Tfigf L
SUlfdt@ 250 mg/L
Ch101"i dE 250 mQ/L
Fluoride 2.0 mg/L
~
Nitrate 10. mg/L rotal aissol ved sai; ds 500 mg/L
PH <G.S ar >8.5
Color 15 p7atinum ~
cabalt
unit5
Turhid#ty 1 to 5 JTU
Fnaming Agents (detergent5) 0.5 mg/L ~
RrSenic 0.05 mg/L
Barium 1. mg/L
Gadmium 0.010 mg/L
Chromium 0.05 mg/L
~
Copper I mg/L
Lead 0.05 mg/L
Mercut^y 0.002 mg/L
5elenium 0.01 mg/L
~
Silver 0.05 mg/L
Zinc
5 mg/L
Endrin 0.0002 mg/L
Lindane 0.004 mg/L
~
Toxaphene 0.[}05 mg/L
PhenoZs3 0.001 mg/L
I Natiana] Interi m Primary arink~ r~g ~~ater Regu2 ati ans (~1. S. Er~vf ronmen~tal Pra- ~
tection Agency, 1975). Primary regu7atians are those which deal with constituent5
that may affect the health vf consumers.
2 Nataanal Proposed 5econdary Glater Reguiations (f3.5. Enviranmenta2 Protectiara
Agency, 1977), Secandary regulations are thase which deal with the esthetic
qualitfes of drinking water. These are guideTines ❑nly.
~ChemicaZ standards far phenals are nQt included fn the primary or secondary ,
reguiativns. Becavse vf the frequent use of phenal by indu5tries situated abave
the aquifer, the avaiiabTe phenol data is included and refererrced t❑ the Public
Nea I th 5errrice (1962) recammended i i mi t❑ f 0.001 mglL.
Source: fJnited 5tates Gealvgical 5urve,y. ~
214
J
5ummary of graund-water-quality data
Chemxcal standazds
Number Numbe.r 1Maxamum Proposed Numher Number Maxamum
of ❑f cantam- secondas}r vf sites of value
Constituent~ srtes sample•3 inant level exceedrng sampkes abaer►~ed
tested testerl levelZ [EPA ehemical exceeding
(EPA 1977) $tandard chemical
1975) staacla rrY
Iron 212 958 0.3 mg/L 40 5B 78 mg/L
Ataaganeas 200 700 0.05 mg/L 12 12 1.6 mg/L
Sulfate 168 596 250_ mg/L U fl 210 mg/L
Chloride 364 11115 254 mg/L 1 4 ]1.000 mg/L
Pluorir3e4 210 706 2.0 mg/l. Z 2 3.2 mg/L
Hitrste 247 940 10. mg/L b 11 28 mg/L
Tetal dissolaed
sotids 364 1.087 500 mg/L 3 3 539 mq/I.
AH 329 918 C6.5 ❑r 78.5 3 3 kange
6.2 ta 4.4
Co1vr 128 484 15 platinum 5 5 21 unlts
cobaYt
units
Turbidity5 139 462 1t0 5JTii -a ~ 1 10 ,7T4t
Foaming Agents
(deter9cnts) 25 77 s- 0.5 rngJI. 0 0 0.1 mg/I.
Ar9eaic 89 185 0.05 mg/L L 1 (]fi4 mg/L
Sa rium 3 3 i. mg'/r, 0 b 0.070 mg/L
Cadmi+tm 112 335 O.Q] d mg//I. 0 0 0.006 mg/L
Chrvs¢ium 93 I85 0.05 rag/L 0 t] 0.03 mg/I+
Capper 97 210, k mg/L 1 1 5.2 mg/i;
Lead 110 235 0.05 mg/L l 1 0.43 mg/I.
DSercury► 95 196 0.002 mg/L fl 0 0.0002 mg/L
Selenium 3 3 0.01 mg/L Q U C0.010 mg/L
silves 3 3 0.05 m9/.T~ 0 D <U .(][}5 nsg/I.
Ziac 97 395 5 mg/I, 1 1 7.5 mgjI.
Endrin6 17 17 0.4002 mg/T, 0 d [6.002 mg/L
Lindane 17 17 0.004 mg/L 4 0 s6.001 mg/L
TDxaghene6 17 17 0.005 m4/L 1 1 0.060 mg/L
~ Pheriols7 24 77 0.80 rro4/L lfi 18 15 mI/T.
SAUT'Ce: U.S.G.S.
215
~
,
~
agents (detergents) were never exceeded. The recQmmended ZeveZs of manganese,
cktivride, total dissalved salids, pFE, co7vr, Copper, and zinc were exceeded
in less than twa Percent of the samples. Iron exceeded the recorrmended ~
]evel in almast eight percent of the sampZes tested. Proposed secondary
Zeve3s were exceeded a totai of 87 tirnes (1.4 percent), from a tatal of more
than 6,300 tests.
(2) }ii stori cal Water Qual ity Trends
!
A tabulation of data fram 5 ground water sites lvcated in the generai
- vicinity of the prqject site are included in tne tables on the folIawing
pages. This tahuiation includes a11 avaiZable aata ❑n the chemical quality
o#' the water fram these sites. Sample results from the on-gofng USGS
sampling program are inc3uded through Decem6er 1977. metailed camparison
of this data frvm ❑ne time ta another may he ffiiSIedCIing beCdUS@ of charsges ~
in sampling and analytzcai methads aver the years have generaZiy improved
. the accuracy of the resuit. Data reported priar ta 1970 is of less value
than that reparted subsequent. The data cansidered most re]iable are the
resuZts of the on-going USGS mvnitoring prvgram.
1'he availa6le water quality data show that while the cancentration of
~
any ane chemical cnnstituent may vary from sample to sample at a particular
site, na lvr+g term trends of changing water quality are apparent. A siWar
conciusion was reached by the USGS in its recent report vn the aquifer.
(3) Water Quality Variations Within the Aquifer ~
In generai there is little change in the qua7ity of the grvund water
from sampling points near the Washington-Idaho SVe line ta the ❑utlet
springs narth Spokane except fvr sait cantent. The available data
indicates that there is a maderate increase in sa7ts cvntent in the aquifer
as Tt pa55eS f ram the state line thraugh the 5pokane area. The foiZowing ~
tab1e shaws a general7y increasing concentrativn of salts at selected crass-
secti ans of the aqui fer pragre5 s i ng frtsm east to we5t. Condueti vi ty , ni trate
and chloride concentrations for the various crass-sections of tne aquifer
based vn data from the on-gaing USGS study are shown on the foTZowing figure.
This data shaws a very sZight increase #n salt carrtent as the aquifer ~
passes under the Spokane Va]iey from state line ta about Opportunity. Over
this section nitrate ievels imcreased from .9 mg/1 ta 7.2 mgll while can-
ductivity (a generai indicator of dissolved solids) irrcreased from 281 to
292 micrvmhas. FrQm the area near Qpportunity to the east city limits of
Spokane the quality of the grvund water, in terms of sa]t cantent, imprnves
samewhat. Over this sectiorr canductivity, chiorade and sulfate Zevels all #
decreased slightly while nitrate leveis remained ahaut constant. 7he 7nterim
report of the °208" Water Quality Management Pragram indicates that this
impravement in ground water quality near the east city 7imits of 5pokane
may be due to influence from the Spakane Ri H r which discharges to the ground
water alang the Lipriver aam backwater area. The most substantial increase
i n sa1 t cflntent flccur5 between the Cl"DS5 -58Ct1 on at Parlcrvater and the one ~
at the north city Zimits of 5pakane. Over this sectivn cvrrductivity, nitrate
chTori'de and sulfate cancentrativns a11 shvw an increase. Nitrate cancen-
trations increase from 1.2 to 2.6 mg/1 and chlaride ]eve]s ga ta 4.4 frvm 2.1
mgll.
216
1
. '
CiIFrtICAL QunLt?r aF GRpuNoWAt[R
snMPLE srr€ NuMneR 25/44-15Jl
•SITF LOCATIOP7: !Ije a O. I y Qata patc L1epth 14ater 5pecific pii Turbidity TlSreshald Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Ftirdness Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved iotal Total 7o:al `ote'
Source 5ampled (ft.) Temp- Cunduet- (units) (.1TU) (]dor 5i]ata ]ran 14anganese (Ca,mg) Chloride FTuoride Sulfate tlitrate fiatritc Phcs C,ssa`ved
eraLUre aace tJumber (S i)p } {Fe} (1~n) (ng/l~ (LL) {F) {SOam (N) (f'~ (F„} So1iCs
~[°Ly . (units) (;iiry(L} (nxilL} 4+ix~It} (mqlL) (n~glL) (ti1p)L} (aiigli.~ Imglll i~u9il'.) ;m~31_1
StanAtrd 0
S
. 2-0 ,p
I'o'irn~~r.vi "'f ` .
F,.a or 3.f1 0 3 .~1.~ 25(5.U 2~.~{l
}g.5
.
GS6R 6-57 190 114 2.70 w--
DSHS 8,09-77 _~16 7.2 2.5 .024 .009 144 7.0 17.0 1.4 .14 150
DSHS 9-30-74 283 7,8 12.0 ri-- 180 5.7 .1 ZO.tI 1.8 .04 179
V
. r:~
Clii rtI Lni. QUnt i i r nI r,HnuNnuna cR
5AMf'LE 5IT£ PII1Mf3ER; 21V4LA..3L'11____.
SITE LOCAT[Dt{ _V-"a_A~ ~I-SuU;uan & Val iey Way}
Gata Date Uepth 1-later 5pecifqc pH TurSidity Thresftold Dissolved 615salved Dissolved Hyrdne55 Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Tatal Total Ta`al `;tz'
5flurce 5ampled {ft.3 7emp- Conduct- (untts) (.1TU) Odor 511ita lron '•iangariese {Ca,my} Chlaride Ftuoride Sulfate Nxtrate Nitrite Ph~.s ZIsso:ved
erature ance tsumber fS~0 l (FE) Nn1 In~Ili} (CI.) (F) {50 } [N] 0~ 4~011ds
{°C) ~urlrts) (1101A l {,uylLa {wqA) {wqfly tmq/L} {ru)pl.) (iiiq1L} 4mqIL1 'q,ql.}
anil,tr d
lmaryj r~ 2.0 f❑ 0
',uL ul ida IY' (f.S or 3.f1 II ! ~i', trtl 0 250 Q 5f1j, )B.5
DSHS i- 7 5-70 8.9 224 8.4 6.0 .44 .003 2.5 15.0 1.1 .04 125
,
DSHS )-30-74 320 8.0 13.0 .03 .010 8.2 ,1 21.4 2.0 .02 .04 148
USGS -3-17-I7 -o- 210 2.0 1.0
N3 USGS 10-13-7' 370 3.7
J
co
■
~ ~ ~ ~
ciu Ma [.M. QclnLt t v nr rROUrrostAILR
shMrLE sITE NuMBeR• Z5L4 '-.1_U2 ~
serE LocnyIar+.
flata Uate pepth 4later SpeGific pft Turbidtty Threshold Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Hlrdrress Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Tolal lata] To:al %te:
5ource Sampied {ft.} Temp- Cnnduct- (units) (JTU) Orior Si]ica Iran 4anganese (Ca,mg) Chloride Fluoride 5ulfate ri,crate R,trice Fh.s Lisscsived
erature ance Numher (51 0 ) (Fe) 9140 ('ngl`l.l (Cl.] (F) [50 ) (H) 01 [rs_.] SolaCs
{ °0 (un i t5 ) (11194) {ni411 } (aiurll. ) (viqll ) (i:H1115 (inglk } (aiiq l l } (mq/L 3 [n~ ~L ~ ' ~~~1 _ }
SLdqdard-
i`t--- 5 2.0 1{] ❑
~u,.c~ncf,3 ry 2 ❑r 3.11 • li 3 {j5 - - • 250 Q - • - 250 b • ~ ~ _ _ . _ grFri +
M5
L1SBR 1-3-55 242 7.9 .7 9.1
DSNS 2-7-71 300 7,9 6.e .26 8.5 .1 24.0 .82 .25 190
E]SH5 4-7-71 424 7.6 5.5 .10 .006 50.0 .1 25.4 1.8 257
ro DSHS 5-18-7 840 8.0 5.0 >24 .OUb 21,10 .1 152.0 4.0 .18 403
A
D5HS 6-07-7 14.0 1,8 _m_
QSNS 8-3-71 200 7.4 12.0 ,14 .003 7.5 .1 22.0 1.8 .26 227
DSHS 2-7-72 8.5
DSHS 9-8-72 -_a 270 7.8 8.7 .12 .006 1.5 .2 29.0 .64 173
C++r.MIcnL OunLi r v nr GsnurapWnT rR
snMPLE StT€ NuMBea. 25/44-1201 - ~
-StrE LoCATian: Indusl^jA.l Park Nca. 3 .
6ata Date Deptlr Water 5pecifac pH Turb)dity Tlireshold Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Htrdness Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Total Iotal 7o_ai -ote'
Souree Samp4ed (ft.) Temp- Londyct- (units) {JTU) Odor Si]rca lron tiaagancse [Ca,ms'j Chloride F1uvride 5ulfate tritrate fiitrite Prics 'Zissoived
erature anee r~~iiiber t51 a 3 Ve3 (wn) t•ngllY (CL) {F) 4so ] (N) (r) ]017C"4
(qG) (unit5) (111971) (Eli(11L) {n+rpIL1 (~~rqlL1 t~~~/~7 ~m9~tl (mg/L) [rnqAl) (m IL) :~~II_)
$La ITd.lf'Q ~ ' 2.[~ i(1 Q
i'innor•y~ ~ t~ 250 ~ 25f1 U a~~~~ '
:~e:cui) d,i r•g'~' C{~,'a or 3.[i fl 3 I~
M3
DSNS 11-23_ 10 280 7.9 5.0 .]U 3.5 11.0 1.7 .01 167
70
DSNS 5--1-75 293 8.1 ~s- 19.0 .32 .005 1.0 .1 21.0 1.0 .01 .01 ~185
DSH5 " 11-5=75 .01 .010
~ ~
° IJSGS 5-19-77 295 1.2 1.2
IJ5G5 10-12- 320 1.2
77
i i r
~ ~ ~
Ni rtiCnt Qlllll I I Y [7i- GR0111ai}b1A7ER
sAMrLr siTe rtuMB-
•S[7t LQCATIOPl: Modern No• I
.[]aca pate Dept9i 4later 5peeifac pH Tur6idity Tfireshold Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Ilirdne5s Dissolved Dissolved Dissolved Total Tatal Ta_al `ate'
Sourte 5amp]ed (ft.) Temp- Conduet- (units) (JT13) Odor 5ilita Iron '4anrpancse (Ca,ing) Chlnride fauaride 5utfate ttitrate Pditrite Rh.; ",4ssa:vetl
erature ance t;umtser j5~0? ~ (Fe) [Mnj ('ny]L} [CL] (F) (5fl ) (N) (r:) (r;. } ]0l1e5
t °cf {uni t5 } {iEiqli. ) (nq/L } (irq11. ) (iuqll ) (itigiL } (rriqN J (nqll ) (inqlL ~ (+n41L
Standard
I'f Sltld) Y~ 2.0 10 0
'.~..und,iiy~ (~f.h or 3.U fi 7 n5 250 U 25f} p - - - ;rr>8.5
asws 5-12-70 249 8.3 a 14.0 1.1 .03 108 .1 12 .99 .001 ,04 138
DSHS 9-14- 77 360 7.6 1 4.5 .12 136 14.0 13 2. 5.[l13. 08 168
D5H5 10-14- 240 7.5 Q 6.3 .07 .006 142 4.2 .1 17 1.2 169
71
pSHS 11-16- 268 7.8 0 3.(] .006 148 4.o .i i$ 1.6 .04 .15 748
71
D5Fi5 12-14- 256 7.7 0~ 1.0 .32 .~109 124 7.5 .1 17 1,1 .027 .02 1 44
~ 71
~ OSNS 1-17-72 240 7.0 2 2.5 .18 .018 172 3.5 .4 24 7.5 .11 .04 lOG
DSHS 3-25-72 260 7.8 1 12.0 ,24 156 .2 28 ,b r~- .02 767
" D5H5 1-19-72 240 7.8 0 2,0 .20 .019 168 4.0 .1 22 .16 ,026 184
DSHS 5-71-72 280 7.9 0 10,0 14 .006 156 4.0 17 1.2 .024 .02 158
pSHS 6-19-72 A_- 300 7,4 1 2.9 .28 .603 160 4.5 .1 25 1.3 .]D .03 177
DSHS 7-17-72 28$ 7.5 4 .020 .006 116 7.5 . 1 15 .9 .060 .08 135
DSHS 8-23-72 232 7.9 1 5.6 ,20 .003 156 2.5 .4 21 .71 ,011 ,01 165
DSHS 9-14-72 260 7.6 i 4.2 .008 140 3.5 .1 24 .52 .005 .07 151
EAA 9-14-72 260 7.5 p ,140 .002 135 6.0 15 .75 , ,01 146
OSHS 3-11-75 270 7.4 0 6.3 .140 .005 152 3.5 .1 16 3.8 .02 151
Variation in Graund Water Quality at Various Aquif er Cross Sectians
Contaniinant 5tate Line Otis Orchards Qppartunity Parkwater North City Limit
Conductivity, micramhas 281 255 292 257 360
Hdrdne55,
mgl2 as CaC03 148 143 155 141 204
Chloride,
m911 .92 .99 2.1 1.6 4.4
Ni trate,
- - _ ` mgll - .93 1.04 1.2 1.2 2.6
~ 5ulfatc,
m911 11.8 12.2 12.5 12.4 20.9
Rpproximate distance
fram State line,
in mile5 0 4.0 8.0 11.0 17.0
Saurce: U.S.G.S. manitaring data, 5/77 thrvugh 12/71.
,
r
r
395 ~
( YJ
~ . M~ Snnxu~~ Pa+w [Si ~ I
I RNewry ■
Nine N1de 281~
h1c.~d a,,,,. n, ~ 93
Firr 11i1e Pralrir ~ 43 •
Plrsaam Prairic ~
~ wWino~~. ae !fi4
Srven MLlr 44
5 ~ 26 Zg-'
; I ?SS ~
1.2 •
- ~ !~IurFan Acrrs y~ c.. I ii4 ~
4~ 13
YST I A
1 2 I'aslsSc, a I',iek ~T.HIW4,nJj H
F,• ~VyGCL
Uias ~ hcLards y ~h.f• ~
~J
! J ! FLIS I ILLp P k ~ YS" •
ra + 9m. e,., q,~ 9P ■
r..m ~
. sO,e„ a uI511111 , I za,..~. A..1 SIT~
bPPerlumly
~ L_J • ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ a ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'cradofr ~
LL6erip Lakr
seulCAhl 1R11 RNnTlaPiql • ~ [iled~r~ 31nea,i
rA ~ ~ 1 1
YnetAtlnfV IN rRLluNt: WATCH qunLi'er AF
slnrasi firnnr ' VARIflUS AQU1FL'fi CN[15S-SLCT1f7MS
E}1.1 Ni}
145 i.ywwinly
B u ~ L7 ['GI.wWs
~i 7.1 N~Inlf
` ' ApmInCR6r.aclYm
~ fi ih'nklFl t'
lrJUrs n'ry~r7 B`[~1', 1\r
r,1r1! an,v.rr. }~fmr~m,A, 1ro-Irv0-1
. ~nticanLh~ Si1URCC U.S.CS ilola.3j77-i2J77
0 4 . ~
]95 ~
LfLFNP
q } I.Sqikanr Rinr al Ni.ee Slye i Jls I,
x ~ f L RirrrvJe S r~ik
n Mx Sp~w4m Pra o. ~ 3 f adfilp 4pnnya
7 i~ I
~ i %'1kh..uik 9
~ 1 1! ~ E riAnxvxlh SM1
"pM ~ L•/ 6 W9Npvifl~ ~ 9l ~
N~ne Mde W.A.
& 5pnug. ~
R1cad ~ n~~. ao wwV3 3 ~
F'ivr Afile Prafrtr
~•••r 5 ~'n . Cleasaril Prairie 4 wan5ermr<e sprinp I
I 1 a taa w.a, n-i
wn~ Rq /
- - - I1,
Seren Mife Hna6 W p
I
!7 2i181ilsd. peik ~
$ 4 1).i{dln n
f L~ ~yT ~ ~1+.~.~ . 1 WWhi~ lUm ~Y
Y5 r ~ IS [Ill~l
Afaty;anAcrcs we
i4Riuv 12 ~
- Lt~
Q4
Ta.sadcna Pyk ~Tlejjtwood - 5
vl H
Q
Ui*{lrchasds ;
J . •-Allwo ~
r ~
"dP m B iV a I f 16 I
r►usirGar 11
a.~_,.A..
17a1Iman sor.w..a..~ srr
L s I r' a Opportuntsy I
W.adale ,
4 ~..Ihifly L• ~
i
SMiACAN[fN[ERlVA7lONAl. (a~L'R[u5C ]tne Y-
~ OURMaIF~
A1ur¢n Rrn1rte
N si
c 6 I "208" F1LLil S1.ITr1
~ ~ .
u ~ y AYCkAGL CUTAL NITKAi 1, mgJl
$ ~
~ 195
Ilune 1971 - Ilccemltrr 19771
~ 7HNk1k1H ' ur?unee ~ +i` _ ' '
.~,lr.,~~ri ~ m! ~ ~alysi., pla~uimg rar~mnnrt
~ OYE ASILk. ~
i ~
a ~ r Ab da AL
11
The saurce of the increase in salt cancentrations as the aquifer pa5ses
thraugh the Spakane area is undetermined at this time. Crasby has noted that
some increase in dissolaed soZids concentrations couid be expected due to
natural geologic and hydrylogic mechanisms. This would include the possi-
bi7ity that some saits may he dissaived from the sail materials that the
aquifer passes through. This explanatian is supported by the lack of any
long term trends in water quality noted above. Surface recharge fram the
hiZ1s adjaining the aqu#fer ar from the area above the aquifer fs anotner
possi63e explanation. _
The uSGS and the Spakane County "208" Waste Water Management Program
in their on-gaing monitoring pragram have cvllected and anaiyzed a Zarge
number of graund water samples from depth selective weiis. These weils
a71ow the collection of grvund water samples at variaus 1evels be1ow the
surface and pravide data on the variability of graund water quality with
depth. Resuits of the 5pokane County "208" depth selective data are in-
cluded in its Interim report and are not reported here. The "208" field
data covers the same ground water s3tes and time period as the U5G5
sampling but is cvnsidered less relia67e as it is the result of Zess
accurate and reliable anaiytical techniques. The lvcativn of the depth
selective ground water monitaring sites are shown vn the failvwing figure.
The resuits of the depth selective sampling over this time periad
indicate that the ground water generalTy 7s of uniform quality over depth.
Of the 13 monitaring sites oniy tw❑ shawed any indication of stratifica-
tion of contaminants. The mast ciear cut exception nccurred at site 25/44-
17R1 (6a3faur Park), At this site depth se7ective samp1fngs were made 6y
the USGS ❑n four separate vccasians. The results are shvwn vn the fallawing
table. The sampies col7ected vn dctober 10, 1977 indTCated definite strati-
fication of salt cantent. Chloride C4RGentrdtion5 were found ta vary from
6.4 mg/i near the tap to 1.7 mg/l at depth. Three prior samplings at this
site, hvwever, failed to give any indication ❑f stratification. This cauid
indicate that stratification is a seasona7 phenomena but substantialiy mare
i nfarrration isnecessary before any defi ni tive cancl usions can be drawn.
Sampies from site 26/43-7G1 {Whitworth Test well} indicate a smali chTaride
concentration grad7ent with depth. On1y ane sampling hy U5G5 has been made
at this s7te, with chlaride concentrations varying from 3.6 mgll near the
surface to 3.2 mgll at dep°th. The data from this site is insufficient to
draw an,y canclusians regarding stratificataon. Nane of the other monitoring
sites gave any andication of 5tratification.
Coiifvrm Bacteria
R large number of bacteriologzcal tests have been run an ground water
sannp 1es from the aquz fer and the resu7 ts are T ncl uded in the fi 1 es of the
Washington State Department of 5ocia1 and Heaith Services and the Spvkane
County Hea]th District. Na surrmary of these data is presently avai]able.
Nv attempt was made to tabulate these data as part of this report because
the vast majarTty ❑f analyses reflect the sanitary conditions ❑f the weils
and distribution systems and general7y are nvt indicative of the bacteriv-
lagicaT quality of the aquTfer.
225
~ ~ in,siFii esrrr ~
~ b wnpai[ i~i
M~ Spnwa~ P~ex Q. ~"y E AHi'P! I 1 I lil ~ fls ~
51=1'Al 1 Y 411S%FIiV
Px. waY YRI I FY NlNtil[IN N.IkA ~
f Ilhl I IIIiN PAkK ~
Nine Mac Atcad non. nn ~ g iNwN
Five Rlilr PraieK .1 Rui wnuwir Nsr1 ~
Plc iiant Prauic c i y ik.ti rHi wx
StY
Sevcn Mdr - ~ I ~ aaIiv~.iuv
~ ~ wiunukiuwsr ~
l ~ ~ ~
~SOfF~iR ACf,S
- 0 ~
Pasadrna!'.ui. ~T.rwwul H
~N IB O ~ 1'1 ~IY c[ ~ ~ Utisflrchards 4 ~
~ ~ ~ i Ps~iklwruid 29
JJiisdiiin ~g SP k ~ Ve1 c ~
' ~a ~ ~ BroW.~v Hr~ 9p ~
m
Se d
. ,aw. Ti g II1J11 ~I Sww.. Are
I ~]L 1E
Dppur[unily
Ycradalc i
LilMrly U►c , -
~ f~li•nrase ~
Sfd%AN61NiC3lNRTi11VAL
~ Ri"Osr
r•^.~'hlnran Praine LOCrITCOM1E OF DE I'TIl Sl Ll.['TIVL
~ ■ ~i GRClE1MUriATCIt TE5T SiT[S
■Y ,
$ e q^~
Gmundweler Sampluiy Suc
19i
~ HxaI r 1~ ,
. ~ E laLLE~ SOCIRC@ l! S G.S
l~.mr: ~ f~f,~g, U,t
i in mh ddlkL r ~ ~ a ~ a AN
I4ATER QUALITY FRaM DFPTH 5ELECTIV£ GROUND WATER SITES
Ground Water ldentifzer 5amp]ang 5ampling Conductivity Dissolved DisSo7ved
Sate Number Date Depth {mzcromhas} Chloride Nitrate
(mqIL) 4mq1L)
208 Badfvur 25144-17RI 77-05-18 77 - 1.6 1.2
Park 76 - 1.6 1.2
79 - 2.6 1.4
83 - 2.4 1.4
9$ - 4.7 1.5
118 - ].5 1.3
77-08-03 70 309 1.7 .67
74 312 3.6 .94
88 310 1.7 1.1
114 360 1.8 1.2
• 77-05-05 . 70 258 ' 2.2 1.2
14 249 1.8 1.2
' $8 254 1.8 1.3
' 114 256 1.6 1.3
17-10-13 77 315 6.4 -
82 354 5.8 -
- 87 300 3.1 -
.92 275 1.9 „
1]3 250 1.7 -
227 -
~
Coliform bacteria have been identified in water samples from the aquifer
at a number of 51te5. In the past at least four cases of caliform bacteria
probiems have repvrtedIy occurred. In ane ca5e Madel Irrigation District tVa, ~
18 reportedTy ahandoned a well due to colifo'rm bacteria cantamination. In
these above cases it is not knawn if the abserved caliform bacteria were pre-
sent because of cQntaminatian of the ground water or because of pvar well
constructian.
A large number of cvlifarm bacteria anaiyses have been run as part of
~
the 5pvkane Caunty "208" Waste Water Management Pragram. The results of these
colifarm bacteria analy,ses have been consistently negative from alI sampling
si tes.
The deveiopment of the proposed shoPpfng center may impact ground ,
water quaTity fram the following sources: (1) waste water cvllection, treat-
ment and di5posal faciiities; (2) storm water drainagey (3) solid waste dis-
pasai methads; and {4} chemfcai transport storage and use.
Percolate DiZutian
As noted abave the Spvkane-Rathdrum aquifer is a very dynamfc graund ~
water system. It has an e5timated average flaw rate of 1,320 cfs and moves
at an average velacity of about 100 feet per da,y. The pvtential recharge
of the aquifer that wauld flccur from waste water^ di spasal draa n#'i eZ ds and
precipitat7on over the aquifer is a very small percentage of the total
aquifer flow as noted in the previvus section. Any contaminants that are ~
carried to the graund water by percviation of these waters wouZd he subject
ta substantia] di7utian. First, drainfield effluent waters wau1d he diiuted
by the relatively pure water applied to the surface area above the aquifer
hy precipztatian and domestic irrigatiQn. 7odd in his study of the aqu7fer
has esti mated that draf nf i el d effl uents cnnstitute approximately 12 percent
of the tatal water applieWa the surface area ahave the aquifer in ful1y '
deveIoped suburban areas. Taken aver the entire 5pokane Va7ley th~ per-
centage would be much less. The fallowing table, acfopted from Todd,5 prv-
vides a summary of annual water balance and percolate water quality ►raZues
for the Spvkane Vailey under suburban development canditivns far the year
1975 and far the year 2020, assuming a population increase of 54 percent
during that periad. This analysis indicates the su6stantial dillution ~
of drainfi el d effluerat that takes pi ace, as the esti mated total di ssol ved
soiids cvntent of the percolate is 302 mg/l, a vaiue substantially below
the spring water standard of 5'00 mg/1. A similar analysis fvr the year
2020, assuming a 54 percent increase in popuiation (and drainfield effluent)
indicated that the quality of the percolate water wi1Z remafn almost un-
changed. Todd, in his anaiysis of the aquifer comes to the foiivwing ~
conclusion:
The analytical results of the forecast impacts at year
2020 when campared witFr the present impact, 6oth measured
in terms of volume of Ieachate and dissoZved sa7ids cun-
centratzon, indicate that the present impact an ground 4
water quality is already a significant proportian of the
uZtimate levea.
~
228
Sur3mary of Annual Water Balance and Perca1atian Qual7ty Vaiues
for 5pokane Val Z ey 5u bvrban Condi ta ons
1975 2020
Mean AnnUal Prec i pitati on, i n. 19.5 19.5
- Septic Tanfc Effluent, in. 3.95 6,24
Lawn Irrigatian, in. 8.05 10.09
Agricultural 3rrigatfvn, in. 0.72 0,21
Total F4pp1 ied Water, Zn. 32.22 26.14
Percoiation, in.lYr. 11.11 15.39
TDS of Percvlation, mgli 302 304
5vurce. Todd, U.S. Rrmy Corps af Engineers.
229
~
,
Zn addftion to this di]lutian that occurs as the result of percoZation
of preeTpitation and irrigation water, the entire percalate wiil be diiuted
as it reaches the graund water and is m7xed with the main flow of the aquif er.
Tne amount of mixing that accars in the body ❑f the aquifer #s unknown. ~
As nvted in the previvus section, this•percvlate represent5 a very 5maii
purtian ❑f the total fZow of the aquifer. The svmewhat higher cantaminant
leveis repvrt in areas near the aquifer margzn indicate that iess mixing
may accur in these areas than in the main bady of the aquifer.
Waste lJater Coilectian, Treatrnent and afsAnsal 1
The fallowing sect#an vn Sewage Treatment discusses the prabable en-
viranmental impacts fram project reiated waste water cailection, treatment
and dispvsal facilities. This inclrades a discussion of the prvbable impact
on grvund water quality.
!
5torm Water Drainaqe
As diSCIl55ed in vther parts of the EIS the surface water runoff fram
the project site will be disposed of on-5i$e t'hraugh the use of asy~tein
of catch basi ns and dry wells. No provi sians are made far the treatment
of 5urface water drainage. It can he expected that surface water runoff 1
from the praject site witl cvntain minor amvunts of same grnund water
contaminants. These wauldinclude suspended sa1 ids, petral eum based hy+dro-
carbans, and dissolved invrganic salts. The majarity of the cantaminant
are subject to substantial removai as the storm water percolates thraugh
the soii column a6ave the ground water. SQil systems do not generaZly ~
retain anian5 inc7udirrg nitrate, chloride, sulfate and bicarhanate. These
dissa]ved inarganic material wili mave with the percoZate waters and may
pose patential far graund water contamination.
Chemica1 Storaqe, Transport and llse
As zndicated elsewhere in the EIS space heating withan the prapvsed ~
praject site wi17 6e exciusively by naturai gas or electricity. It is not
anticipated that any an-sTte storage of fuel vi7 or petroieum praducts wi7l occur an the prroject site. Thus a threat to graund water quality fram
the accidenta7 spillage or Teakage of these materiais daes not exist.
Tt is anticipated that by its very nature the proposed prvject would ~
not result in any significant use of fertz3izers, pesticides and herbicides
fvr iandscaping ar garden use. These materiais while potential graund water
pollutants, would not 6e used intensively enuugh to pase a threat tv ground
water quali ty,
Prvximity tn Water Suppiy Wells ~
The 1 ocatiara of water suppiy we71 sin the Vi C1fiiTt,71 of the prvject si te
are 5hawn on the following map. The water tahle gradaent in this area
resuZts in a graund water flow ta the narthwest as shown 3n this map. The
c3osest we1l down the flowline fram the propased drainfield 7ocatian is ~
approximately one mzie away. There is a weZT located within about 1J4 mile
of the prvpQSed drainfieid szte but it is nat in the projected ground water
flowiine frvm t'he drainfieid. ' 230
~
1 SllkliU l iil I ~~II.. ~~j1•~r ~
~ .µi~~"~,ul~~ 11•wlLlNlegiiY L\ 11'CIUp) ~ .
~$j kMn
12 D~I
~`s-70
I i 10 s.. ■ ~ _
♦1 a ~i z
, I ~,~ie.~ Arr y~ . 4544
000
IPI~[IN I Qµ 7
2~J j43 Q •
e._. ~ ill:t ~ ■ - _ iJ
I N I 11 ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~
L55, ~
• % ~,~~~~1 • 5T['E
i
SP4 AN~ I S/44EI _ `25/" . 2.5 44
,~-It,t.L, „ i.i ! ill is rl ~ r
~ _A RI'k 1
hPN lf.l I
[fl'iYJkTl9N l'I5' _ ~..'S !4J
~ - _31)l VkRAUALE
P
I ,
1 11~ 1+. ~ _ ~
- I~ - C
t~
M I
1 F[.I i.lY
rir nme.~nrABinudeofeafm ~ftl1S~ "i~
wak
k.ish.~eei arak+e{II~~oUwr . _~~.1 t
<nl.rval~. r~~ iar 1`. ~
`"p`•'~"'1d11"~"`°~~rv..w.»~, ~ WELL LO At10NS DU1YFiST1tEA11
~M
ERU31 PHJ]I CT SI7E
~~`ti _
I f1~1 liili L•.
~ SYalivSupply Ueu I ~ ~ ~ ~
sou ier, i. u s c, s
EL II.iItHlRI!} 4.\'I1! H\~1N, !tiL ui~wr~r.a
i.J-, 41"IF Yem --na"'A .urary.., PIW~~add,4R. [e
Sewage CQliection, 7reatment, and DisposaT Facilities ~
In 1976 water was pumped from the aquifer at a rate of abou~ 145 ft315
far domestic and industrial uses. After being used, about 64 ft Is [44 per-
cent] of this water was treated in municipai or Tndustriai sewage treatrnent
p1 nts and then discharged to surface water bodies. 4f the remaining 83
ft~Is, about 49 ft3/s (33 percent of the pumpage) was lo5t to evapotranspira-
tion. (See sectivn an recharge to and discharge from the aquifer.) This
ieaves about 34 ft3/s (23 percent of the pumpage) which returns tv the aquifer
thraugh an assortment of waste water disposal facilities,
. Interam sewage treatment facilities prvicessed abvut five of the 34 ft3]s
of waSte water. These interim faciTities are generaTly 5md1l 5ystem5 which
coZTect, treat, and disppse of waste water generated at apartment campiexes,
shopp#ng areas, mobiae home parks, housing deuelopments, educatianal institu-
taons, recreativnai areas, miditary instal7dtians, mote7s, and hotels. These
5y5tem5 are nvt c❑nsidered to be permanent and may be rep7aced in the future
by extensivns of existing sewer Sy5tem5 or by more elaborate sma11 systems. •
7he treatment proces5es utiiized at these interim faciiities are activated
sludge, bath extended aeratian and canventional, and 5tabi]ization 7agoons,
some of which are provided with supplemental mechanical aeration (U.5. Arrry
Carps of Engzne2rs, 1976). The eff7uent from these systems is uitimately
discharged to drainfie]ds, lagoans, or seepage ditches.
Individual househvld systerns dispvsed of the remaining 29 ft3ls of waste
water. The thr@e basic methods of individual trea'tment and dzsposa] emplvyed
in the area averiying the aquifer incZude cesspoals, sept?c tanks with drain-
fields, and aerobic treatment units with drainfields. The vast majvraty of
individual systems consist of septic tanks with drainfields (U.5. Army Corps
. of Engineers, ]976), The faliovaing figure shaws the distribut7on of the
varivus types of waste water treatment systems ?ocated above the aquifer in
the V1C7nity 4f the prBjECt S3t@.
As discussed in the section vn graund water ahove, no definitive con-
c3usions can be reaehed regarding the pvssibility of waste water percoiation
ta the graund water. The avai7able data does gave svme indication of per-
caZation reaching the graund water thus in assessing the prabable impact of
the prapvsed waste water dispQsal system the canservative d55UmptiOh that
waste water percolate daQS reach the aquifer waZl be made.
EffZuent Quallty
The prvpased project wi11 re5ult in the disposa1 of a treated waste
water effluent ta a subsurface drainfield iocated above the aquifer. When
the project is ful7y deve7oped it wi77 resu7t in the generativn of appraxi-
mate3y 1.6 million cubic feet of waste water per year. Using a cansumptive
use factor as deveToped by Todd, 41 percent of this uoTume wauTd be avail-
ab7e for percolatian intv the graund water system. Thus, it is possible
that .7 mTllion cubic feet per year of waste water percalates inta the aquifer.
7he chemical canstituents of the treated waste water are potential cantaminants
' 232
-
or
WFLLkStEVAVE ~ vaukr A
_ 1 ,
. ~
vFa oaive ~ TREN
-
h11LLW0 0
i
>
♦ N
UFRIVfp Oa
, W
W TN! Ift AVF ~ i~V~~~S / ~ ~
SITE
u u
SPOKAN ~ p
N i ~ orNU
SFNAf.11F AY / l 1 f
.
(,J U.wwuy 'Aam rrveJ by re~n ry~trm ALE7
■ V 1D
a
/ nW a~ea +ar.cd br u.t+rWuil rpua ~1
/
~ ftrwJc wrywA.. u~ uemh~c ~m~mra~ uniu ~ / ~
oG ~ ~
~ 1~.aluN nvJenlW area ~nm1 6y mJinJual rp~w Z / y /
IJIIV. ~C~fP~~ul~. ~II YIU1~Il Il~al~ltpl W41~
nppln-iey SO u m1re pa.ryk ~n
s
• 1-MurJ mJwuW om, -ml by tiplc laaLs. O Yr -
~~upawd~. act~A~~ l~e~lmcsl YmG r
` .
In 1O .
~ -.Y area aened by r•pla tan4.. m+pu6.
~ u I'~ ~
.uDia 4n1nua1 unw ~
P+.n1.4 .f-i„. p~I" wn-.a~~~~a.m~o~e..a~ ~ GLGNROSE •
waym uoiaam I.Nny 1\./ 1111 wve
O I.luew J'Alnc
I'.ei DISTRIUUTION OF WASTI:WATCR
e
! IJiM. 1.pMloJuabu+ ' o TRCATMCNTFACILITILS
~ t
S. ]pN~rc IW Wnal P ~Y ]
E Aaw~•ImamuW I u
P.pe,t~ N ~
tl NJI.'W Iilh A. ^
H.Spo\ine Q 1N~M NiPAve
10. A-ffrad Ida6+qn tewqo podaund
l rte\ Ni Ul1le Sp.Iane N,K,1 ~ ~L ALk
HiIPURTH b AA'UhNSQN, IYt
SOUKCC. U.S.G.S. -.il)n,. pl,+....i.. V.
~
of th+e ground water. A surruna -y of the effl uent quai ity of the proposed
extended aerati an-acti vated sludge system campared to the typf caZ effZ uerat
quality from indTVidual septic tanks is shrnvn on the follvwing table. In ~
gerrerai the effluent quality frvm the activated slUdge systems is imprvved
over the septic tanlc system. While rreither system is effective in removing
nutrients (nitrates, phosphates, and other dissalved salts) the activated
sludge system is much mm re effective than septic Ganks in removing totaT
suspended sa7ids, 6io7ogical axygen demand and eoliform bacteria. Even
without disinfecting the effluent, actiaated sludge systems are more effec- !
tive in colifarm bacteria remvval because of the 6etter contro7 of organic
s cali ds .
Effiuent Treatment in Soil Biosystems
The qual#ty of the potential effluent reachirrg the aquifer fram a sub- ~
surface drainfie2d will be impraved over the quaiity of the effluent dzs-
charged ta the drainfield hecause of biochemieal treatment mechanisms that
occur as the effluent passes thraugh the svii column abvve the graund water
level.
The mechani sms by whi ch pollutants are removed from effl uents appl iypd6 '
to soil systems are numeraus and interdependent. As 5pyridak7s and Welcl,
nate: -
...the averall process,..is very complex because of the Zarge
number ❑f var^iables involved. ...The fate of wastewater materiais
in saids is determined hy a large number of processes, inc]uding ~
physical retentTan, ahsvrbtian on soiid surfaces, plant and
microhial uptake, microbial degradation, volatilization, ieaching,
chemical hreakdQwn, and precip3tation.
Mast suspended solids are removed fram treated effluents before they
are applied to su6surface drainfieids. This is ReCe55d]^]1 to reduce vr ~
eliminate claggzrrg ❑f the sail. Suspended solids which are passed tv drain-
ffelds are primarily fine, arganic 50l7d5 which are remvved in the tap -
several inches of sail by physicaT filtratian or absorption. Af'ter remaval
they are degraded by soi7 micro-organisms in much the same manner as soluable
vrganaCs.
~
Under conditions of praper hydraulic and organie loading, snTuable
organics (Bf3D) are taken up hy soil Micro-arganisms and converted to carbvn
dioxide, water, new cell material and a compiex, relati►rel,y stable array of
vrganic campaunds known as sail humus.
SQiI systems are alsa ver,y effectiue in removing trace metal catians. ~
Trace metals whi ch are of concern i ncl ude zi nc, copper, nf ckei , calp~i um and
lead. Mechanisms which have been p3^opQsed far the rerrroval include.
(1) Absorption by silicates at soil particle surfaces thraugh surface
absorpti an, surface compl ex i on formatian, 1 atti ce penetration,
and ian exchange. ~
(2) Metal fi xati an and a65arpti arr by organi c matter.
(3) Surface absorptinn vr surface preczpitatian on carbvnates and/or
siZicates.
w
234
_ ESTIMATED EFFLUENT QUALITY1
Incoming Effluent fram Treatment Pracess, mg/L
Waste Water Activated Sludge- 5eptzc Tanks
Constituent (mqlL) Extended Aeration "
7otaZ 225 20 50
Suspended
5olids
BOD 5 220 15 i0o
NH 3 as N 25 2 25
Nitrate as N - 2$ _
Drganic H 15 _ 5
Total Pditrogen 40 30 30
Phosphate 10 8 g
Feca7 Cel i farm (#1ML) 1500-5500 210~ 1500-5500
I Adapted from references 5, l, 8 and dfi; under idea3 canditiohs.
2 Rssumes effluent-is disinfected.
235
~
(4) Precipitatian as a d'screte axide or hydroxide.
{5) 6iolagical uptake anJ immobilTZatian.
In general, remaval efficiency af trace metais may range fram 95 percent ta ~
99 percent depending on the nature and depth af the soil cnlumn.
As previausly rroted, tradit7ana] secondary treatment systems da nvt
efficiently remoae the primary nutrients: phosphorvus arid nitrvgen. Drain-
field disposai nf treated effluents may provide partial removad of these
nutrients and therefare decrease the patentiai for grovnd water contamination,
❑r if the perca7ate eventua]iy reacnes surface waters, elltY`OpF1iCdtZ01i.
Phasphate remavai is accamplished by physica]/chemica] retention by
soil cvnstituent5; as well as uptake by cover crops, and remaval from the
site by crap harvest. As orgaraic materials are degraded, complex QhoSphdt25
are uitimately changed to simple (ortho-) phosphates. Orthophosphates react
with the zrvn, aluminum, and calcivm present in nearly ail sQils tn form
very insaluable phasphate sa7ts. These reactians may involve eations free
tn the soil water which resuits in precipitatian or the reaction may nccur at
the surface of soil particles which is termed adsoprtion. PhysTCal-chemical
remro va7 vf phasphates increases as the depth of the 5aii co]umn increases
and as the clay cantent of the soil zncreases. Clays are very fine m3neral
soil particles with very hzgh surface arcalvaiume ratias. They are th+a~g very
reactive. Expected phosphate remvval will range fram 85 to 99 percent.
Nitragen remava3 is snmewhat more evmplex than phasphorous remQva1 and
the ieast understoad. Mast of the nitragen in the traditional septic tanK
effiuents is present as ammonium. Activated sludge-extend aerat7on system
effluents, on the other hand, carrtai n primari1y nitrate. Nitrate (an
anian) is very mvbile in percolativn waters, whiie ammvnaum (a cat#an) is
retained strangly hy soil particles. The ammanium #on (NHt~ may be held
ter~pvrari ly i~y physi cal/chemi cal r~echani sms si mi 1 ar to thvSe whf ch retai n
vrthaphasphate, in aikalzne sails a smali portion vf the ammanium ivn wi]7
be canverted tv ammonza (NH3) which may, in turn, escape as a gas. The re-
maaning a[rmonium is readily oxidizea ta nitrfte (NO.,-) and nitrate (Nd,=)
ians by a group vf aerobic soil bacterfa. These anians, as well as the
n#trite and nitrate originalTy present in the irrigated ef°Fluent, are nnt
weZl retained 4y the soil and mave, in svlutian, with the irrigation waters.
3hey may, however, he remuved, in transit, by several mechanisms. Nitrite
may be chemi cai Zy denitri fied ta gaseous ni trogen {N2} and axi des of n~ trv-
gen (NO ~ which subseguently escape to the atmosphere. 5econdly, nitrate
and nitNte anions may be aiologically converted tv gasevus nitrog~pn (H2)
by der+itrifying bacter7a. These bacteria are anaerabzc.
A7thvugh lattle informatian appears to be available vn the efficiency
vf these mecharrisms, it is prohable that they are oniy margfnally effective
in reducing drainfielcf nitrogen. Thzs is apparent far acDUple of reasons.
First, draanfieid effluents are injected 14" to 36" belaw the soil surface.
This places them aut af the mnst biolagically active soil horizan, the tap
soiZ. Secandly, and prabably most impartantiy, drainfield applications are
nvt carefull,y controlled and aptimai conditions for denitriffcation a-re nvt
mai ntai ned.
236
5oii systems da nat generaTly retain anivns including, in addition to
nitrate, chlorides, su7fates and bicarbonates. These dissoZved innrganic
materiais move with the drainage water and may pase a patential for ground -
uiater contaminataon. '
8acteria and viruses are removed from the treated effluent as it per-
colates thraugh the soii. Naturai f3ltratian is the primary mechanfsm of
remoaal. Crosby, €n his studies of the aquifer also cancludes that the low
moisture content of the outwash alluvium provides an environment which is
nat canducive to the surviva7 of bacterial organisms. Crvsby repQrts that
the deepest levei ~ bacterTal organism ahserved was at the 11 fQVt leve3
6elaw the surface. Because of their S7Ze' viruses are generai]y trans-
ported to a greater depth than bacterza. 8ecause the depth tv the water
table is greater than 100 feet in must of the aquifer, and in excess of 60
feet in the area of the project site, penetratian of bacteria and viruses
_ ta the water table is unlikeiy.
In 5umary, effiuent dispvsal in a subsurface drainfieTd can be viewed
as a methad of tertiary treatment {i.e. padishzng of secondary effiuents
by decreasing the cancentratian of organic contamfnants, nutrients, patHvgens
r and heavy metals}. Anions, such as nitrate, chiorzdes, sulfates and
_ bicarbanates are generaily not removed in secandary treated effluents and
are only partialiy removed as the waste water passes through the soii column
above the ground water ta6le. As such they pase the most szgnificant poten-
tial for ground water contamanation fram the prvposed waste water treatment
5ystem.
~ Siudqe Disposai
5ludge fram the prapvsed wasie water treatment system must be pumped
and disposed of vn a daiiy basis. This sludge is raw and if not properly
handled could pose a public heatth pra6lem. It is proposed that the waste
water sludge be disposed of at the Czty 4f Spokane municipa] sevrage treat-
ment faciiity. This wauld preclude any patential graund water contaminatian
ar pub7ic health prabZem that cnuTd result from dispvsal at a iandfill.
fldor
An acti vated $T cadge-extendecf aerat7 an sys tem may res ult i n obnoxi ou5
adors when nat proper]y operated and maintained. HOWeV2Y`a vrhen such systems
are designed praperly and attention given tv impvrtant vperating and maznte-
nanee charaeteristics such systems will vperate vdar free. Any sewage treat-
ment $ystem can experience ❑dor prabiems during upset canditions, fldQrs
from pacEcage treatment sys tems are not an unava i dabl e adverse impact.
Nitrates are the ptiilutant of greatest cvncern from the disposai of
waste water effluent in subsurface drainfields iocated aver the aquifer.
tJhile ather anions wouid be carried with drainfield percalate and may reach
the aquffer they effect primariiy the aesthetic quality of drinlcing water
and do nat pnse a pubiic health problem.' Other pailutants are very effective-
Ty removed by 5oii biv5ystem5. 7he potential impact of nitrate cantaminatfan
- of the ground water could be mitiga#.ed by the addit3an of nitrificativn and
denitrification unit vperatiQns ta the prvposed waste ti,rater treatment facilitu.
These vperataans are extremely expensive when applied ta smal1 treatment
237
r
facflities. in addatTOn they add significantly tQ the eomplexity of opera-
tion ❑f the piant, increasing the passibility of system malfunctian and up-
set. At the present ti me ni tra ficati on-deni tri fi cati orr Una t operati ons are 4
,nvt emplvyed nn any sewage treatment facility in Spakane County, inc7uding .
the Ci ty af Spvkane treatmerrt pl arot.
The se7ectiora vf an interim gackage treatment facility for the prvposed
pra,ject i5 a factar tHat will mitigate the iong-term impact that the prvject
may 1"iave. Such interim faciliities are nat designed to be permanent insta]]a- 4
tians hut have the fiexibilitp to be madified to pravide a greater leveT of
control ar be repiaced in the future by centra2 treatrnent facidities or 6y
mare eiaborate smal1 systems. The coliection and distributian system is aI-
ready pravided and the cost vf cvnnectiort to a certtra] treatment faci 1 i°ty
woui d be mi ni rni zed if i tis determi ned tttat srsch a facili ty i s necessa ry.
Proper drainfield site se°Zectinn wii2 a2so mitigate the potentiai for 4
graund water cantamination from percolation vf drainfield effluent. The
drainficld should he located to avoid areas where the water tabie is shal3aw,
slopes are steep or saii perrneability is excessiveiy high ar 2at'j.
~
The passibility that some waste vaater treatment system ef£luent wiZl
perco]ate to the water tab1e and carry cantaminants ta the ground water
cannvt be precluded. The prvposed tivaste water treatment system, however,
provides the flexibility to meet future waste water treatment needs as they
arise. 1
1
~
1
4
. ~
,
- ' 238
CTTRTIdNS
1. Drost, D.W., Spnkane Vailey-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, Washinqtnn and
Idaho, U.S. Departrrtent af the Interior, GeoTogical 5urvey, Dpen Fi1e
Repart Number 77-829, 1978.
2. Newcornh, R.C., 1953, 5eismic Grass Sections Aervss the Sqokane River
, Vailev and the tiiZl.vard Trvuqh, Idaho and Washinqtvn: U.S. GevlegicaY
Survey, Open File Repart, 16 pages.
3. Ibid.
4. Drvst, D.W., op. cit.
5. Ibi d.
6. Ibid.
- 7. U.S. Rrmy Corps of Engi neers, Metrapol i tan Spokane Reql+on tidater Resaurces
Stud.y; Surrmary Report, 1976. . . .
8. Drvst, D.W., pp. cit.
9. T6id.
10. Tbid.
11. U.S. ArPy CarpS nf Engineers, v'~f. ctt., 1976.
12. Crosby, J.W. ITI, Johnstone, D.L., and Fenton, R.L., Migration of Pvllutants
in G1acial Outwash Environment, Parts I-III; Water Resnurces Research
VolUiR2 VII, 1970.
13. Grosby, J.W. 111, Johnstone, D,t., and Fentvn, R.L., Migrativn af Pnllutants
#n Glacial' Outwash Enviranment, Part III, Water Resaurces Research
Valume VII, IVo. 1, pages 204-208, 1970.
14. Crasby, J.W. TII, Johnstone, 0.L., and Fentnn, R. L. , op. cit., Parts
1~-ITI.
15. f!. S. Army Corps of Engi neers, 22. ci t. , 1976.
,
16. Crasb,y, J.W. III, Johnstone, D.L., and Fenton, R.L., op. cit., Part I
pages 204w20$..
17. drost, D. W. , vp~, ci t. '
18. 5afe Drinking Water Act, Public Law 93-523.
19. 43 FederaZ Register 28, pages 55-56, Fehruary 9, 1978.
20.' 40 Code ❑f Federal Regulations 149, 5eptem6er 29, 1977.
; .
239
~
21. Drost, D.W., op. cit.
22. Esvelt, L.R., Interim Water QualitY Manitarinq Report, 5pokane CQUnty
208 Program, Spakane County Engineers Office, February 1978.
#
23. Ibid.
24. U.S. ArFy Corps of Engi neers , o. ci t.
25. Ibid. ~
26. Sp,yri dakis, F'. E. and Wel ch, E. B. ,"Treatment Processes and Envi ron-
mentai Impacts af Waste EffZuent Dispasal an Land", Land Treatment and
Disposal of Municipai and industrial wastewater, R.L. 5anics and T. Asana,
editars. Arrn Arbor 5cience, Ann Ar6or, Michigan, 1976; pages 45-$3.
~
27. Ibid.
28. 5opper, W.E., 1976 "Use flf the 5vil Vegetative Biosystem for Waste Water
Rec,ycling", pages 17-43 in Land Treatment and Dispasai of Municipal and
Industrial Wastewater, R.L. Sanks and T. Rsana, editors. Ann Arhor Science,
Ann Arbor, Mi chi gan.
29. Crasby, J.W. III, oa. cit.
~
1
~
~
~
240 ~
ADOENDUM
' FINAL EI5
' CaMMENTS ANa RE5PON5ES
The folivwing pages contain the comnents received an the Va31ey Ma11
" Draft Enuironmental Impact Statement. 7he written camrnents are reprvduGed
in their actuaZ torm in which they were received, an the left 5ide of the
page, and the Spakane County responses, on the right side of the page.
241
~ STATE °d' i]EPARTF1FNf L]F COMMERCE & ECL7NL7MlL' C)EVELaPhSENI
~ WASFUNG4LSF+
- n,sr~ rs.re~. w.r~ vcw aa. ru u.,
C • ~ :iDCi ~a L -
Anril 13, 076
~
F3r Thomas C. kigghrY
Spo►nne County Flann4ng Ikpuriment
Nortk 811 .IeC3crsaa -
Spokanea #A 99ZG1 "
Ucnr Nr Nnshcr
He Itiave reviexed the, prAlr F.fS for the Vnlley Nall Np reg~~nse ireqUjrcd.
. SAnppang Ccnr.ar anJ [ovnd thc cnveragc ors cneh suC}sci
ta Itie complete nns[ [hprouglf.
~ 4NG teel the Vp9lr:p Muhi ShQppine Cantar wlli conerihufe
-P. to the overul] area ecanemy and pravide n necdeJ service
to Valdey resiJenrs, Thc tux revenues gt¢aruted bnsl
empluyment opportunitics pYOVided hy tltiis pYaject rill make
uh Iafpoctnl=c cantribution to Che con[inuing e[onumiz
- deuclopment oF thc Sliskane Va13ey.
Sinccrcly,
E'etee P Arinas
Ru3e&rtti Anolyst
~ ~ ~ $
° 5Tw'['fe OF
WASHING7C7N 6EPARTM£PIT QF ECpLOGY
C •
pnr1} A, 1979 +
ISi . "fimFms yvsher
Spokane County Plannin9
DepartmenC
HorCh $11 .leFierson ,
Sookane. WA 94201 ~
Su6fect' Prtpased Valley Hall SFwpp9nq Lenter ,
6rafC Envlronmentel [mpact Statecent ,
Pear nr. Hosher
Thenk ypu fDl' pn,rlJlny a[upy ay y6ur 11ApatL SEetCOr,yii 9R ti11S pra{oSec
shappfng renter for nunnv9en
W_ ylsh !u offer thn following smmpnts for yaur cpnslderaSlon.
~ uiscuss4an in tl,e Et5 of the poLenCfal for iaipact on growid waeer Prom
~ surface runoff ansl dralnf1e14 discharge 1s quiie ihprnugh, 7Ne Spnkane / ~ ► Please, ,g~e thg gX ded SeCt}Ori OIl WBtC; t~►at h~ ~cn included as arl
CuunCy 208 Study (I,iaund p{,W3a1] ls frepuen[ly aentloned The Ef5
reCaqnS2e5 th5t thi5 S[uJy w111 Set pu11C1es that r111 af}eSC wS3te AdiJ0T1$ufCi thlg ("1Rc~ EIS,
wa!er dispvsap practtees orer the avuifer for aF7 @eveleoven:. ,
R'. !his Lsffle, cnc xne ssunY nus noc prpgressed ta ene ppint Where a3m The fallowing items (14) arc.,rcxv ed us future aruas-in wh°rch s eel#ic
rnn[liislans can da drnpn kl~ixevar, serreral 1t~s ahou}d he ccnstAeree' ~ ~
Sv all develupers as measures rilh high prro6ahfliLy for 1nclusion 1n ~ ~ L J pil11C]FmS. ppTlp03 &11d/Qtze(iL1TCf1iCflt3 IilAy bL' IIIBde. Ttle dC►!e]UpeIISYV1fllI1g
t9e Ffnal pal9cles anQ guiilellries t6 =ake wnatever reasonabie measures t7iat are recnmmended hy the "248"
1] The possipie use af seml-pervlaµs pavfng IR 45) to minlm9ie surlyk:e study in ardea 'LO Filltl t0 kfSO St13dICS 1dCCRtj(~IC(~ otenhal im
~ ~ pacts ta ~round
runaff is an fuqmrtanL a}te~atfve cunsi~raifon This meesur-
could W a viahde alternatlve tu cAe use of dry uells. WaiBiLlllafity.
,2f A possSh>e iuture reqijironent 1s the use of ufl s~Arators
par45ng lot draina9e prior [a dry rre1T dSscAarge,
3} 5[waye treatment ptan[ dii[h3rges Ya suhsurfaee dlsp[•3a3 (dralnfSe'[l
mav )ove mnre slrinqeot 11m1ta[ipns. Passihle 11a9taLfons maY requf*a
r'eJucLlons 1n sitspanded soZ1d5, 6acterlt ~i e,[h1aMnatieq orfoP
!p d'Srharye] and nitrate reoqrpl
° Ury welfs nay have Iim9ta[fPu3 6n deyth 6Llna surFa- an4 n-r*e-
renl'iFeJ 06 lzaPA.ing iot a-ee
. . _ 7
p1r ihpui5 lk75her
Aprii 7, 1918
Paye 2
ihc Departmen[ ❑f EstiiugY must he Includrd as an agentr reviewfnq plans . y
far en on-s4[e sewaqe trea[mcnt plan[ (P. 97), rnis 15 a req4lrggxm[. a! rl All wafar and servage disposal plans will be re►newed by the approprlate
RC4 4f1 48 tln ihis rpriew requireaient i3 aiso va14d fvr the alternat4ve L s~ I +
oF exnandi nq tlie Rgd LiQiI Fnctlt[r agencies as preuri6ed h]' t10 e]LlStlfl$ gl1ldEl11iC$ SRd pOl1C1E3.
Should yon deS1Ye further taidrnlafion, p3ea5r Cun[att Hr Cezas flernandex
1n our Spokane Reqioioa] OtFtce f456-29261.
Very ~rul~yaw
Qe
r R kaskYn
Envlrbnmenial flevl[w Section
PRFI h1y
cc Cesar Hernandex. 5paAane REqion
N
,A
4th
AL da :
~ srnre nF fSEf~nRTfWEiNY aF GAh1E
WA8311I+~;7GN .wn,.,nr.wsw..,~~y„~,Sww.w.~m ma~uemu
r
q f IA.v Le. Fa
~
Mneeh 23, 1978 1~
P'1r I7f6i1td5 hfasher
Spokane Caunty Plnnning Degartment
NarLh 811 .]eEt'erson
5prkane, 47g 95201
DieAFT EI5 Propvsed Valley Ya;-
, Shapping Center ,
Mr M4sher, +
Yasir docwaenL 114~ 6een revieved hy nu1' etaf€ ag requeyted, nuY '
coauneneo- relate t❑ tvp areue FLora/Fauna sn8 ~:rQUi~dWBt(dr
N Plo-rn anil Paunn klkhaugh the laca'CLan aFFere minimal hahLtat
~ [a wITc~T1Se, we abaiq utsh L6 atress Che Eolloving gpipCs
. Anlmsle nri nuL "displneed," 6uC ellminaCecl rorhen huhitnt ig
devqlnped ALthrugh [hase anima]s pcesent {in ChSa caee, GiYCn thax ad,'aCEnt h8b1tSt5 &FC St mFI]i1R11l111 CSI!']Ijlig CgF13C13y, af1,lI"y1E1l5
small rraaents, sang GLeda, and posaib7y rap[ors) mny accraF_ which use the proposed ~te wnll be d.isplwed and cwentual~y el~minxted sinr~
Cc~ r~-locate, n~sL of thnse dlgpksced" are loak, ususlly n_t^r
Etie C'lrst win[er Adjacent huLitata are uaualYy fll3ed eo there is insuffipent habitat to setwe the displaced ammais in addiiian tb ti►ose
enp¢clty ❑nd, therefpte, cannut furnlah sdequute Food, cpver,
or 6reedxng roem fvr mfgranCS The f1naZ E;S ahould reF!acr arumals presently existing in those ha6itats.
vi'uatLe-i (pugee 1 und li)
2 Rlthaugh to ehe ca«xuul obaervei a vacnnt Tot okly loak
"uaprnrlkictlve, same une Ls usuully made Ly amoli mammpls and
6irds a Uncn awl eoostLtig 6y dey Ln u realdehilal
nelghharhoud will hunC for rodenea by night, n fsn¢fiy of
snnghxrdb muy Focage for seeds, etc Thua, while economicallV
unpradur[fve aueh areua do conC[ihuta tu [ha vveran qua" [y- _
oE IIFe ve now en_loy Recagnltinn of [lfls could 60 msde
the finAl E19 bg deleting such phasses na, "The stra oE thc It fs recQgnized ihat thz scte dvea prpridc an on-going ecatogical funetion
praposed p~~~re~[ 'in presen[1y vacan[ end fs noC pxnuiCln~ ~r_.- ~ ~y ~ ~ ~MI 1 ~d ~t althvu~,Gh tlus function is not economically prodncrive it is prc~duott►re
eanLrit~u~ian to ~he prndutyfvi[y nf the e^vLrormene'" fnna^- ~(.l
from t,he senw of prcrviding npen space uad arumal habitat.
3 All rhe ahnve points shauid 6e dlacusaeJ uRder 4°lota rrE 5 ~
Falm3 (page SG), Lhua eliminating Che "HIA' 'En [he-draPC
Aocorrling to tlie SEPA Guidelincs (lanuary 1978) WAC 197-10444 tte
6 2ead agency shali place "NJ'A" (nan upplicuhle) nexi to an iiem when the
praposal, mcluding its indirect impasts will not signi6cantly uffact the area (or
subarea) of the cnvironment in questivn. Tt waa felf by the lead agency that
this was nat a cnfica] irnpact of the proposnl in terrns of overali enviranmentai
quahty. Furfhermore, the abvve points referred to are responded tn and
included in this dvcument as the finat EIS.
page 2
Mx Thorms Hoahee
March 23, 1778
Groundwater Lt ++ppeara Chete existe a very ceal poCentiul fpX
aGVerse impncta on grnundwatex qualLty• _
"Water frem on-sLCa runnFf and Sn the Form aF waare vater
fiom [he 3ewage rreatmenC plant w111 6e Lnjected into the gleue refer to the iesPSfflSi:$ addIC$Sli[g thc letter of comment Frorn the
ground IC is pasaiEle Chac same oE ehLe, etther From [4a ■ ~ 1 Spakane CounYy Health Ilisinct.
eewa,ge trentment nr t4e etocm dYainage syatem, msy reaeh the
grousid +aaCer ac aquiFes " (Yage 48)
"In normal precipicuxian ycara aubourfaceJlsposal oE seuage
tteatment eE'~LueaC duea ceach and recharge the gxoundvator,"
(Page 97)
"The analyticel resulCe pf [he fo1'ecest impact at year 2020
when eompered uith the preaent Lmpaet LndSeaCe xhaY Che
preaeni. lmpac[ on grounduarer qua11[y Lg aI[eady a suhatenliul
proportion aF cha ultimaCa Level "(Page 97)
4ie aLso hav4 Che foltaatng queerfons
Thises would ~ an unavoidahle impact, unttl such date that eff+cctive
Eccausa af tka "248" cCUdy. is lt nac premacure co decAare
I--_
roundwater concamination nn "unnvoLduhle udverse Ivp$et"' measus can tre taken on an aiea►►+ade basis ta mitigate such contaminauvn,
Aage 20. 47)
11]
4~% Caukd not aewugs Creatment alterpn[ives (page 96) be thorougli_• Thm filt8'tnatj►re3 are 3ddICS50d 1R the mspdnses to ihe Spokatte County
(3) examine[I and decetmined 6eLare the Fina1 E!S is ndeptedZ Hgal{h Dy$tt'iCiL ,
Shouid noe Amuan fiealch (^li~A" reaponae, ❑age 98) 6e a fzc:o= - 10
`csr consideranit de[erier$t?an of [he equiFei eontinuea:
s in
Because groundwater ie p n6tursl cea+JUCCe, 1a noC y6uX "H/4 11 Patcntial degradatian of the aquifer is a health haaard which will te
response innppropriate7 fW'thCt d1SCLlSSd in response tIJ the Spolcane Cauntp Healtli Distlict raview
5pakane CaUnLy rebiaenta s4auld be guarantead no adv¢rsa impac=s l8 ner.
2n ground wn[er quality will reault frum this pro ect We ~u!dA-aL_-r'
rr,. ~~2oa~• eC~tdy may proviae reeomraenaaci4as ra ai evinra cn~9c
potential grohlema Conaequen[Iy, 'i+e agree wit4 [he dacument Ground water is a naturai respurve, however section 2 of the ]7h}1sical
' tx Ls recommended thut any coaciusirne reached in [he f7,na= j E elements 6f thC EIs F1ddIESwS 1ss11e5 TeIAtCd tfJ WBtCI. Further epmment
;"208') =epaec he used C❑ guiAe pnlicy Ln re,~erda co [he p[aper
._~:_durca ta 6c cacen not anly in [hia case, bu[ far a_1 r'4 i e~ ~ ICg.td1I1g W3tei r91td pOt2ritW impaCfs i9 inoilided lIl khB responses tD tt1.C
~eve? opment " 5'p0kaIIE CUtlflty HBaltYI D1S1TlCk ICYICW jEttCl.
m-unrt you Far [ftii cruuYtunLC,y t-o canoncnt un [he crnL:
;•~e.~~r. i~ Hapcfu[ly the "208" sfiudy wifl proride answers aud guidehnes thatwill
":YRRr4av'r ne carr_ 1 serve to remcdy potenfial pmblems created 6y sawuge and waste water
ee. ~Irr[lrei d13p653].
Lhcid lfrivdahl, Rpp11eJ Ccalagisc - Tenm Leader
5r.virorsnmnt-51 Managiment Divlsian
. j
a ~ ~ i ~ a aft Ask r del r
. r
SfnrE csF
WA$311NCi I CiN d3 EF'AR I MENT C]F TRAI+lSi;CsRTATIOIM
11..v I[w Nm ~ n r71. Pac,..
Cxaa~iv 1~. fen Nsu.i.aw.e w -
` April 17, 1970
nr Fred payMsesd, Rlreccne
Spuknue ~¢uR[g P1RUn9ng Cumfaglvn
Nurch Bll Jelfaravn licrnue
Jpokoar, unaningcnn 95201 r
Dcor 5[r.
ay crsnaml[tnl omDo Anted ALpall 4, 1918, a Dsufc EuriroemeatAl Impac[
SEa[emeu[ ao pcupoecA "Valley 1Se11" Shuyping Csake.Y vas rgesiyed aC Chle
p(flte on RpCl1 d, I978.
Recounsa vna r ryueacud hy April 19, 1978, vlth Xx. 'Noafwr pulncing ut
chot [he 5[a[n O~pBr[menr nf "CrunupureoEluo rAe oaylcted lroo Che dl nscr!- ~p The omissic~n was an aversight, Any furkMex infarmution of interest to the
hutiou llsc lnas~sla ea ;nceratasa 40 1a tha main raute F+c1#ie ~
g fo ~ partment uf Trr.nspvrtatian w~i~i be gmr~}ded as it ~omes uvuiiahle.
the 8pohana Yulls~f ond oum m~]or a~pect o( [he lucallCy 1"ur cho propnses
daveivpiaen[ uaa sra ]aenLed as co provida r~dy eeceea to [d1e Bre~eay,
!L wuld e~~08[ ppprny,le[e C136t ChlB r~ncy na cmtaGLa1 40 earYy ee
peeaf6le Becauan of u _cusk casssra eegarding Chs Epact oP efia
f~] genernced eroPflc uaing ehe um fecllfty ea4 the eapnLilicq aA eha preswe
~S highvsy sya[em co eccept aur'S genaro[ed craffic,
V
ua i'ccI r.hoc [r. ePwuld ha the ;eapanaipil![y af the davelapzr cu edArcae
kn eush o atacomeac draFe, chn ranp ccyus![g of at~a adJbca~at 8u111van and The develaper is wiriing to ►Wark with the L7epurimeni of Trahspnitatinn
Surker eoaY ]n[crcliaa~gso, Lli a pcuk rulu.ua, Lke e6equney u! lAu prcacnt 4 t~
' tncareriangie to sscnru~futa cha a~rdc~s~,ai aosieo naur voivsca, the 3~1d SpC1~CSilB C6i1~1Ly ifl $8~lop1i1,~ A&Cf,~Utli~fl t0 t~18 tP3~1C IJI7~7~t OR the
eFfecsa of esgnn6a un pollut,lun nad cnngsa[fan 1i r cA sigoola would 6c piflject yicinjty raad netwQrk. It is agparent that Future expsinsian and/ar
neceesasy ea pruuote sncaraection eaFaty e[ [1aramp tarslaal oud 11 the
eevelaper eonc u1ed poreFcipnLioo in any ui cbc war. knc..rred as a impravement of the earisting Tnterchan~ complex at SuWvsin arzd 1-90 wi~i ~
resulc oF c~e ne+rlr generoc~d zra!'f[c. Ieqi3i.1ed eYCII ►vith4ut the proposed project (see s►ttached fraffic sfudy). Th0
41Aa orTSCe %s roaporulin8 dsreetlq tu sdle Ynvicarsmental Imvacs Staszwent dEVClifgCT WUitId 1?C LYIIIFIIg YU PaitIC1paY6 L[I RecesSaI+yI IllipfaVEIR0Rf8 Qn i# b&SIS
Euc r.o chn almc[ [lm+t durur.lau 6oeruen uvxicn und fimi aceepeonee dace
r~e cn rbc Fusurc deaec c~g~an at~1d aieo ba ~ransnseced ~o relnted t~s the drafSc ineseases attributable to the ~i~lo,~mient af the projeet.
Aae1n[nnt Dlreeenr Plnnning Givielan, Gepar[menc uf Sraneunrintton,
Olympin -
Yarp [ruly youra,
~ f .
TPR & H4EHIPtC. P 6.
Alatric[ F.n¢ineor
6iRli, h p
sc. R. Al6urc
E. N. F¢r$uyon ~
B. R $grnus,$
- . ~
AIR POLWTMN COaTROI AU1HDRlTY
1arch 27, 1978
ovn
~
MY iiwMs 6iusher _
Spoi,ane C6Ln[y Planning pepartraenL
Rur[h 811 .]effersan -
Spukd119, 4d5hdRgCOn 99201
Fkar M' ihsher
We have revdcaed the ert's!t enviranwenlal fmpas[ slateutn[ i'or the prnp~yeC -
'Valley Flall' shopping cenier at 6roadway Arenue and Su1lFvan Road. IEe ccncur w+
:tle rryul u oF the alr qua6lty analys9s slvMng coWliance y}th caroan m~noxxdii •
standards by 1985 us1n9 published emisslan fac[urs, The uie of future-year emtssfwr jg ~~p
faC[or5 plpylpp5 M1py(QyCP LpWk Federa1 auto11uC1Y@ Pragra6as ai'e qoek3ng Mlien 1n idCt gnzxed tltiat the federaZ uutvmata►re prograrna are presenTly not
-
ancy are nns I t ia ant9clpated houre+rer tAan an inspettlonloa9ntenanEe prvgramw111 eff'eciiYe to the degree prvjecfed and that to actually be reattzed an
eecoae part oi' keyhin9ton State lofplerMntetiun Plan revFsfans realixing tlat only
t+i[h State nr lacal veh9cle emission thetky ean the [arbon m'inaxlde sWndnrd pe inspeGtianJmainienanc.e prugram would reguire implementation and en[arce-
acaiesea Taerelorr the rtna3 e„v9raraeneal 4cpacs saaeermene shuuld riecogni=e !.hae
coMl9ance xi[h stgndarrfs rfll 6e haxed vn Ehe realfey af an inspectlai/malntenence msnt,
omgraaf
[!J
4('A The tollorfng commenes aedress snm poss161e minnr aypograoiice3 errors nr
~ om,as9ans. 16 Clmission uF page numher is noted. M6ri1t61Y11$ IA~II]~ ~R~ '~OCBiC$ iDII '~IIge
Pa~ 79 -'fhP m4rllYOPiny 1~¢SUlt5 fnr ¢dCh day Lrp SYp~rU3rliCd p~1 pdnB IF 3$•
Page 39 -(The h9fJiest efght-haur aveivge during thlz t9Qe ras a 4l p9^+
t,nscn {s helm+ the Sfete seandara or 9 c" ) 17 17 Nated: chunge 8.77 ppm tr 8,91 ppm.
~ Pa9e 90 - ihe r-ieadSngs far enna. prt7cuear? ryvllutents sM+weC no
rete•tve ia ambte~z ar~ 1-c+sions 1$ 1(~ ~+futed: cttange•'particulate ~iiutants" tv "paaticulur gntlui~tts".
~
°a~ 0.6 - $uspen~d parelrulnms s9na3st 6f . . • . 0
Pa9e 146. leaie 5- 6 hr Cureentratlon :-e~, Cancentra[ians 19 19 Noted: chanEr suspended paztfculnnts to suspended paetieulates.
dP there are sny questions, p1ease feeE Free W cnneect thds uffice. Ge
appresiste the opp4rtm9ty or being anie m comnenc an enis draft envfmnuen_al Noted: change haading of seaond colurrin frvm 8-hr Cpnventration ta
s,uect scace,wnx 20 1-tsrCanoentratiQn.
Do~gias K. PaCtratx, Air quaisty Engfiee•
Saukane CounCy Rir °olluklan 4antrof Pu!Na-
aovas" warE r .v spaxA ne caueaTr w1 w weEtiuria« evr.rnaE wurHaruar
" i
I,yria 18, 1978
4"sgsSotg
Tar Spo66ua County F1snning G.xnaSseina
Fa~: f1Rr~ Y. Qnnssalg, Ptauniag wd Trr[lic Dl+t~pnea .
Raad aaya*Tamaat
suLjsa►: uBFPr EIS "valay ha11° •
49se re.iar af tha aborn drnlS RIS kee 6eeq p,qmp]ated andwa psea the fa]lnxlng
cooaaeLe frsr 'nw cuaeideratian•
B. 3,1 s - ft1oCLnn Cassdi[iona
Shnuld nlm addrean prenanT c.paciRy ds[3cleacy oIswll;sin'$usd LeLwien
Om-d-ay ma z-SO +nd that prreaa6 dizrd C}ma lraTlia msma ~t 5~13lryi Alihrsugh this POint ►ras Rot specIFically mentianed irr the Bratt EIS ttus
sud 8rnaa-aCY re$ss1Sa !a arrrr sayacft7 eltsssLioae undar azketing lral[ic -
.oiume8. 1 ~ secYarsn vf Sulljrtn does 87cpeliencse peak fratfiC hCSUr Cvnye9ti0n aS dceS the
B. 3.1 c- keenuraa ka Flit[rate Ad•ersa Inv~c<a P. 81 ~~vanfSPraBue intea^xslion and the Sulliran/1-90 intarchange.
st.tem.ae swggv,se peesibae raur zme Impro.emnas rm. ape.an• ►.a,w,. mrsn 22 P1CSSe see the Traf$c Stud
to 1-90. ProsecLsd tmdli¢ ral~zso indtuEt ehae WRvaea Braadrry Ar.cue ~ Yi'11CZ[[ded lR Apj}Ei1dIR la flf thIS docP[i1eIit. .
aed I_9A. fo¢r i.n. a,acsov wonie ti. C+ir-Cagacity aad .i. Xa,s rmtiue' Recvmmended imprnvernents fvr 1985 ►vith the Vafley hiaff inctude ttie
wuld La yuetiCiad. id3SCional r1gbS nf w~y wuld ~ srquir~. 4n or"r Eo Z 9
~ wweroc c ense aeaAad iapaar~une.
23
TClI10~1f1Ag: (1) W'j(~eII SilI~1NL1 R~ Ip fiiffi CF7VeI ~1~5 ~iti][11 T~~D ~6 $I03rIWSY~
P_ ea sr.ade,,,ac utl&smte pomiml4 s■vm.ramc nr aNiara7 .aceaasd .aat cu (2) pro►nde e secand left-tum lane vn the southbound aPProach to IiraudwaY,
l~
gerker Roed. Slgaldiceat pnrc6aase vP r3ghis of Wq aed eouCly laprnvmeni 24 Qne fJf tj18 T}uough Lanes eovld hecrsmc the secand left-turn ltiT1S; s1tEd (3)
af tha raM W vtrrfRl ef.unCards roulA be rryqvLraA Yo rralisa thia proppael„ pecavide a nort)zbound deceleratian lane at the !4[al! dri►rewsy.
P. 89 ntsSmanL ragwrding the needad lA,pro.ment v! fhwsdrq dld mS
indicase the existing aub-eiendard 40 fcwt s1ghL a; wmoy Oo @readvwy 8vemuo
cuid LhaC addlkiwwl rlgnt or .q mula b..e t„ be osc.sR.a so r"lsw fue Additionai right-of-way will [e giVen by the propetty dereloper as
Prop-Na. necessary.
dUU3L CCHP02EI' RMdHRId9 PR0.1WPM lUPFIC iAIB IKPH]VHKMIl'S
Based oa the vxieslag r3ghte ar rs7 snd prssnat phpa►ca} farysoremeaCe almg the 't?►e deer+ekQper WoRId bE willing tv prvride additional rig}it-of-vay far
FreewV com.erce,x ea„e ar suiyi.em Ro.d, xbe yossLaii:ay at Ms"n►ng e,ais..a ~C Ers~adwa ad arxnt iv the m ases~ ~te.
Road ta hauelv the projeclsd traf!!c aoeeoeing the yroppe~d elti, *pyraere wer~ I~~~ ]f ] g ~1
d1![lsult end ss,1 ~ynS 6s prpcLicnl ta acL4evi. Ip uM are¢i lt vculd GLy
caEal reupoae7111ytjr pf the darelaper Ca ryroa4de µ9 Sa,p.aseppnta to EAa szieilag
snd Vuwpms4 oyetm ia ardar to prarlde, ndsqvaLo sM eats asoua in ehA proyve+ad s3ta ~r See Te"ilse NO. Z4^
Serel~~eat,. ~y
The dereiaper would he willing to prnrride whatever tmprovements that
aire necossary ta pronde safe snd adequate aceess to the sitc.
. ~
Fage 2 ar ~
SubjacC- fYF►F'P E[8 "Yp]la7 Nall" ~
Bassuae lLare fa aa ,sune~tea af Cayntr funda and dw Sr She praecnt unsaYie[Sed It is apparent, basetf on existing [xonditions and on past cnunty requests
naeda Lor ssiseiag Covaty ,Tnnda, ehs CnuntT „rilk ca4 nbltEn►s I116A8 I6L' I ~ f4Y g~Mvan Raad impravamenis, that the neer1 for imprnvemenfs to 5ulli►raa
ireyrvrgnsaca oC eha i,igv reryuired to eervv w4r yrSvaia devaloinienYe.
Wiehnut tke ia~ 2mcntac[un af Sha recn ill'E TCC0g7HZed. ~I15 existing YlCea CQitl[L ~ coordinated Wlttl t~103E AOedS
p ginitod paaded Lmpmrwata to oltlga.ta
ndreTea impacYa, sAequaie =4 nnra acceaa to !La 83to nll ncE M srai;aLla q~ - projected to 1e creuted by the proposed prvject and cauld be answGred by a
aud thio fleyarLoart wvld hrre ►o racomeend danSat oL SYus mune change r1[h
aveh Siae M ad9quRCA ind aRle s4caa6 pmrldod v3s an iiprorr~ rui~ryr e~et~n, ~ foint eff~ of the county and develaper. F.,ach party wnald he erapectef to pay
its share of the cas t.
It iS the daveIopers intcnt to work witli the cdunty to pl,an and pravfde
ade9uate access to the site so that thase idenh5ed udtrerse impacYs can Ye
miiigated.
~
tri
a
~
- ,
~ - - -
s~wraru ro~Tr FiEnt rM nIs,ruc,
ib
~nce~-arrt~e c~scactan
r
Gdt! Aoril iO_ 1978
T[F :Imkme Caun1.1 YSennlna Cmmtsntort-.
FROk. LL+Y.e- C. YraLhea, h 6 SMAST 13ran L3:3 far bmrosed Snuc,Qlnr cantae - YJU.P.es' wil,s.
1. BcCcreacn suGJecY dreft datnd YnLruorg, 1976. •
2. In general, Lhe stuQy adaquatelr eete fssetb ihe OSLSSIpqLCd dRVSC9ASGRLCI
healt4 lmpncte uf 4fxe pro]act anS spysropr3su altignt3aig eeaourca
3. Ths rear 19a,~ 6r 1983 !a indFcaisd m Laglarsing nata iar e enree-yerr
dcrela,p:mot ~ri~ aeoa~wee" avae ta R be th cv~pllnfefcd stsl a~ ~pseaga ocprrcltlszl a s a pa na vlect. rt nueped" th fusudates. ra
d e velay~ ~i})BCICd WaLCI ilS.~e filr t~f0 FII6j~t S~16111d ~ T8V15Cd iijliiaIf,~ T["1
at oi
Beceuae of xha untnosm natuse o3 e6e eoaplailae pdseing af tne pradecS, tha appmximutely 18 TR'lHl¢ii pll0114 ifI111118v]I. It ,18 e%peCtCd tf1At 'd1io5t UfthIS -
HSS prvreens CoLe nddreaa tneln ear'Fseeneanninl Lasues of !As 'eoeepletre"ir pmlcce WatC,C eyypLld aC CGIIV81"[~.fl fU W~I.StC W71tCL W~11Ct1 WOllld Ye d1s~iQ9ed DP }Fy1 3t1
jrroS art ragssc einec lhero ure Ta knwn apeelf
Bveu ehe eompl~ 9
nccupnnta osa rhlen La eompute vaLer vasge end eeraga [iova Pnr exa~le, spprcaved dtsposai system. 7 his ''WOiIl~. b@ t~1Je Cp'~{gilf[1tion 1a3e Of thS flYR~n~d acsr ~aa4 or 5~,~a no 7w.~o cunic rzec 110.266 ce 15,370 6e11nne P Y
per eay] !e projertea. ae ifie eaam LSm, cawsse flavs nrn prNeeted aC QPC1'FIt1C1Ili1l PrOJeCt. NO phc1.SiIIg 11ifpI111atjO,i1 is ayaiia6ie giar.e it wili depend
5.M ta 6,000 qallnno {rrr dr+y. 9hv eevaga C3ara rre rrpacend xo bc ~$~ntYfi]] ~CCf (~ECI~1871~
ralntlve1y aonsiea6 throu~ the yerr aad lrrdgntim af laedncaped erens y p]~'m3I
Ylll De 1lmiied Ya aWiuY eia mopWa prr y4pr. 'Phla rc6u7Lil fP SAe SF~
La ib,~l grill~e per day reter usap,a ~.nanaeu~ege) wr ee ~naal baala 1.9ag '
~ ccnccncr6Ced lncn ps.k ~su~er flava af 10,~ to 20,009 gs]lena pes d~. I]Lvlnusla lo ~
y tLi o t' g roscer l mgac 11i~;tlceace nn the ~li.eryr ca~1pllisy
oc the va[er purvapar'a eyatem "n athar usera. bosp,parLum3fy ia effarSvd ,
co cralusce Smp$ct as 1s ia phaaed into aperntfan
4_ Srnerel rafarancea are madsr [a t~ un8awm aopecta af pallutfaµ f.ha Spokane
nqulrcr and cWe 208 Wantevaser Han.sersat Stuai ww ln proareae. As Flease see the expanded ►vater sectiuh. Appcndix H. inCliIIICd 111 f$15 FiASI
lnd;es¢eA in yhe &IG, cpe reeulta oC chSa atwb (24d) qY11 mt he asnllnDla ~j E~~
aniit tte Fa~i n[ 1$78 nr per4spQ eron 1.,S..rr 'i'n da6a +rn be.n seea 1w
cr€dence of algn5flcent graunavater yaliuiloo ia tav r.11np srca. Nz~arar,
cansdrsued hlqh Intcnal[y land uaa !n casrm of aurfscad areu aad aevage pro-
a.~~aon
-y sn recs ne ro-n ca lsaa ea aned poilusson I. cas n,s.ure.
5. ln rdev af thr axtsnt ai' the unknmrna srd 148? bv[Innlna dete Cor prv9est 'j'~e resui~ of the ek20$" Stua gnd Sl1bSUBAt gil1dei1R0$ I~ENCl4 E!~ .'13 a
neia thc unknovnv nnaacia[ed eurren[ly vieh the ?OB Btudy, it nrema manda- ~
tary Lhai 6hc ouequacy of mtelgaCin~y ~rauraa propona4 La eerleved agein a ~g{il~, p[ tkC study shauld bc enmpleted prior t5 aetusl constructivn oF the
fn teroz~ of npeckf3c pneae plma end :aB Gtunp ri"ca - groJecf, Thll$, any guidelines prnmulgaie$ by titie stpdy should be available ta
ECr/ak incvrpvruie, into the actual developtnent vF [ltc project.
' cc tluvonh and Anderoan, lnc
i
~
, r~ugasynpo~
'P'oi 1Ywnss G. loobar, Spolcans C4uuSy Plaoning Deparlmmt Prma Yf111am d Hei31y, qwrlfY
844 Va17oy Flall 3lw=rping Gacter, DrndL of Pi8 .
nose i tpr11 12, I978
13rring revLeired tLA F7irinonmanY4 ,iapacL BtnLuaut of the proprssad ahaypiag
5astexs Va11ay 1Sa11, I im unnyle sl Lpp praeamS tiai ia ldogLio the arar-
a11 e,Tw¢1r1a lnpmt un ovsr Eapaxtmeat. pf ppliYVa. Ydasa eiri meny rsrlaLlin
T
sh.t coula coAs:sc„ce w i...o„s„g sn. L,pms bpou the s,.,crri. n.oartouxis. 32 gq The prvject whcn operational wlll have a security force on afull-cime
4akaesl4 ~taditt~+l ~Sn1pl~nutlcenter rLe p4111 Owntbaft ~~p`rtal,~ ihand a ~sis to patroi arid mnrutvr the total de►+elopment, especially the retad are~,
1mDeuY un ue oossld he rinSa3xrtd soma+haR, 8uxarer, sraldanSid' gi.u+.fA tLa6 Design Featuires wili aIsv be incorgorated intra the pro}ect to pr6ride additional
slvayi Pol'lo+.e auvh s ptoliot m the aoa its qysFEloA !o slsuya grf.t. I
asn aee F3ouesndn uL add.tilaaal pecp2e 11sLog 9a the, ust and aI tha rallry nQnopesating hnurs security and lam3t the num&cr af potential entry paznts.
wiRhfo the oart rev ye4s~e. ms pmyaaW projeaSa DeSvaaa ESLaxL~t Eake rad
9prsVa Araaun la s gapd ow eyla af vha! I oa tlalking nLouS 14R~'t.~1C(f ~7I0SI$IT15 will most likely b0 lilCo[~3QIiiYed XRfi7 the O~Se[iltlIlg
.
Ia addiLian, epeolLio typae of L"tuowoa enuld areata diflsrent lmpaaLr aa prncedurc oF individusil merclirnts, pn page 84 section C iC was recrsmmended
rhls dayarSmeail hnmrer. the a'Ludy desm aot ,idaiiM 'idr iypu ol 6asiwaan t~lat cvnsultation t3ELC pi1CE with loca~l law enfarcement b'~t]C18j5 YCl deTll~@
- r~s ~reix n. ~ sncd eeYesoy~ae, potettf.ial anti-crime measuies 'Ihis should take place in the giunning stages
Wshapr the ¢nly {wettlre rtaLamaci thai aw ba rsdv Sa 4bs; aqy dtiveIIn,}teenL hefween the pmject arcFiifec#s and ciime prevenfion affeers. -
N ar wis wcura .ac of Ehia ~kinde vavld hsvr as~ dVwE on the 6yakaar
~ ~unty l~arii!'■ lsspufmaas alma t~M r111 tra a gnaR lmrsqe. lo SrafTlv
~ now and a srasanmun popu1a41ca growra iu a e.sa.r maii VwgrLpnio am,.. `i'h~ g~wlli pressnfly r~ccu~ing ln the Val2ey is lik~iy to accur whether
_ CarEeinly, !t y111 naaaaplCske sase~ s+e-iealna;l~ ou tkg par1 aI Shla dspaxt- ►J
aant la ragpid W uur praaeaC prlru1 44sYrlota. Tha dfmLrSaE ELli dqrelop- Of not the progased project WCre b11Ht, Certainly tliis pro,eck will 5timulate
atens r.ai6 faSa fbf,ha lar8aag Sea8~D~9 ai~srsan or sae r~ .~i.F~~ ~rrowth sn the unmediate arca, especially of a higher density nature. ~In►vever
d1eLrloY. that we P nseuCl nYmh. ri aaI pare cw %ZLVil oar t3aE aw
sa d lnsa¢ s-$-rhia en.a, woiud7,^.aa nom Lsb.rty .aa a,,.,a 14.. ►s ym residential grawth in t,tus area, hut perliaps df ncrt a significant a density, wiU
mn aeb, thia rathiC lugo patxvlling dlatrlOS ha8 mang bUYF,-!o pxnblms,
- the oain vna W1ag mt eaaugh oanpawr !n gLra tha " of prataatloa ShaC w GVERt71all]r 4[;Clli. 1he cansiruetion of the prvject ►vill accelerute the process.
s6ould 6a giriug.
Ibaim W. vl;l sseloL yaa emedhai !c ro+u' plaap4ig ymaiaa. IlL' to17I pIGJCCt 81[C Wlll COl1S1$'C pF A CDAVEtiIBRCC CBfI'[eZ aE t$0 We+St efICIs
agarden ❑ffee]restaurant complex alvng the east end and the mall complex in
uaaIYiy the center. The mall complex wnq cansist oF scveral major department stoaes,
jwiivr departrnent siores, restaurrnis and cuFes, gift shops, jeweicrs, househrsld
goods, mens and womens apparely and vurioas general and specialty shaps. Tha
exact mLx of these shaps is far frvm be(ng detemuned, 6ut they wiR genexally
foh6W ttlCSC j1fleS.
This pro}ecT ►vill he a major kraf'Cc generator in this area. Brvadway,
SuWvan, Sprague and ta a lesser de,grec Fiara, ConkUn, Musion and Barker will
expetience siguFicanF trnf8c grmwth and a subsequent increase in accident
pvtential.
~ It is hc+geful tiiat tlus EI5 as a cliscloswm document will prn►nde sufFicient
iead time and infarma#san so ihat the prncess of expanding or readjusting
putrol tnrees can he made more eFTective.
_ •
~ r a a i i a aL Ak ~ i
CIT Y ClN SI'OK AfJE WASWII~',TpN ~
c~rr ~ r coru.E€s~o~
]5a C.o w
ry Nlz~~nrd ~I, der~a[L.pfec
~ •y rsuCpp ~ Ca« •
+ ~wa~w ~ i~wyyl
tl~eYl4~[~fi e T C~.ao •
I ~ Rpn il 4, 1978
Ma . F'red f]ayhersh
5Pnkana Lgunty Planniny Coounias;on -
Harth Bll .7eEferapn
Spokbne, wachFnyton 49201
ALt4nCinn HY. Thomas Mnsh~r
']yu= A7r DilyhuLeh-
Ra: Valley Makl u'alt 6!5
9'he L'ity 1'Lanninst Wpyrtwenk etaPF hqa cs3Vi6wed the Sub1ect pcbft
F.15 and eubmtt the ioldOwing conaenta:
tiA[4N6T ANALYSIS
The LiLY 15 cancvrnc•d uWut the renlaRUi ehonnin+t coneoY'S econo-
'^lz• imrsact un CTa Cup, - -
.N]
~ uey[nnLng on gage 21 of the pYaFk EIS q disCUSt31urv of euonamlCa ls
~ piY)y(dEd Th[u diacussion ia generalky a tesilaxsnlal Ca the £ee6x6L11ty
7_ such y shoppiay Cen[er anJ an andic5tian a[ tha kax an$ ecannm3C qen-P::
to Spokan~- Launly Sxiscu E1xle regional shCpping cBnta[ w11L approach !-^.C Th8 pmpased pmject 1S 8.fitlRpe7t$d ti0 hIIVC lll the ISIige Of 760,000
_ si xe vY :.ha cuCC7nt Central Bualness 6iatrict oF the CiE.y oF Spa&ane,
st waU!d a_ mor¢ appra,prlate tn dlscusg 6n eanu dutaLl the impact o_° the SLjIlBIe Feet nf grnsa leasable [loor area when st os completed svme time s!'ter -
provaee: Faz.yFity on the can4~nued VanLillYy of the Cun. The CAey thrcN gh- 19$5. /~{~ay~Rg t0 the °iqRalysis ~of Develugment Pvtcnlials fQr Spo~ne'a
aut its p~anning ~etpseys has nne to conaldprahie len kha ta maintnln the
C9Q as the majoc shogpiny cnntor f n Jp4kart8, Spokarl0 Cpunty, snd the In- CeRt1'W BllS1I4BSS D1$tI1Gt" prepared by the Econdmie Researcli Assaciates Fvr
land E,n6irR. (see accacnLn goitcxes szom ctcy'a aaoptiea L8na use siant. 5pakane Llnlimited (5eptember 1975)• "There is currently 3.4$ mil2ian square
7'hu sputce af the daka concniaad on the tahle q. ._ppgns 26 la incor- COCf DF tO~l Ie~lil S~la1CC$ lt{ the CB,i}. Assurning 83 percenT e~ciency, tt►CR
i..yr-ly '3s^ed as, `u.s cpnaua ot 9us1na8a ansY Retaa 2rapa,• TneZeY
'a
is!~ coincidea mL 1;~ that puplisp~ ln the puLlicdtlcn "Salos y liotket- t]7CIe 18 .1boilt 2.96 IAillIOI] Sq118IL feEt 9S grOSS I£a53U]C 1'eL311 SpACe 111 t}i0
1_19 Hesnay.mani. 1976 Syrvey aF Uuyinq Aasaet " xhich te the appacent prf- CBD'r. Since tlat tfII10 add1t16R3l IloNi ,Tfftad S]lace, ]1FLC teen added an the
ma=y saurc" oI the data on paye 26 as irell ag the unceFprppced kah1a cr
00«5 23 ana xa. se cand flcsar of the Bennet I314ck, the sccand lcvci of the 5herwovd lNall und
Fri thc-, ❑e.at"t E[S iti "I" la ineuCflckent eYu]ua[iun oP the iwpace uwn ~ 8dfI1'ElOI18I SpdC+E IS }eSpg CAI1St[RCLSd lIi tIl@ f!@W R1VCT Ya[I[ SfiUtiiO (f6Ia tOEii]
v.1] ]ey [Ctax~c~3ntor[i an.l dT6YrlcCa cau6qd py tne prnpospd supeY [2-
c ianal shapping eenter Ia La apparent [cam the F9arkek Analysie tk!at of apprctiximsrteiy ?0,00 0 square TeeB af net leasahle flvor atea).
7a~.~c propQrLiana af tiLe exyem-liturea nav Yaaiiy ruade ln ❑x[gLing gteres
n tlle va11ey, ~.he CsLy, an3 ulssawherc in the counry, pnd fuCUre expen-
l:t.iey that iutylik Lu anticlEl,ated by iheue eatab21ahmeata upuld lnsteasi Tbc t]ITCCt SpLLppe aj'tIb d.Rta ySth8Swfvy (~dB~►~~pu1~j,~~'~,~'~
4v captierlcl by stores wlthin the p:oi.ased center TneYa la a dufin:te
laL t nC aluarxpn pk yconomic impac! upan eacablashed relail lund usP (1975) pRbliStiC[I Z1y 5ales 311f1 Hfstrketing Ma.ruigemmt M3gIZlIi@. The
"•°.n-• fundamentul hase, liawever, oripnated ai the U.S. 17epartment afCnmrnerce-
mainly the Bureau af Ccrtsus and the 33ureau of Ecurivniic Analysis.
Piease sec ilre inrJuded letter fanrq Research Ecanamics whioh sum-
marizes the projected ampacts an the exlsting Valley area cornparison goods,
sales. (See APpendix F.)
. y
Mr Frud Uayhar9h - 3- April 1, 1978
niso, tnece fs no aata taeia and littte dsecusalnn at=out the avail- 19751NCOMES
c~tilv dollar znaom~x an the propoaed shapping centes's prlwary, seconaary, ~t1 A1! and tartiary tsade areas. Thls eWa1'~ahke dqllax irsaQmp aht7uld pe tom-
parnd to the require3 dollac voluune tr~ suppack the au6javt enntat's qtoaa ]~,gp~jl Z,nC55IIlCS
iea'a67e Floor aeaa au wall se the required dollor va]umst need~+d Cn Y p
euppprt the extatiny shopping centPra and Spra9ua AVUnuB bua3ruiaaea. 1t Tp(¢l $15.000- .pZry,[]Q0 NCa]] PcrCapita
appears~Lltiat thls SuGject xa eaqeustlvely taWeted ►n the tsEerencad market
analysis and should be suwmwrlzed in the D8I5 , 1975 24,999 PlILC Incomc Mean Incorne
7'IiiY aame (oiYuro ta mske An eatlmaYe aF reaiatrttucion oE pxpon- ,
,f)t~iics res.i]ka nrose axazweration o~ne estscaere o neE-L~at V8]]ByAriBB 1$,992 7,103 2,284 $15,910 $4,644
wqtiya acccuo Inthe farm oF addltional tax revenuee antl emvlowenx.
shue 100.0% 37.4% 11.5%
1., the last narar ~ra~~h an pa~ o- -2B of the DraFC EI5a[sCVSa "1'ha nc:w Rernaznder af
yyneratod Ysy khe propn5et~rrayecL r~ousiY amount to a5 mrllinn---
^oaecd on $55 ma111on per year when [ully nppratienal, ths eeratl tax Primary Zone 59,616 15,421 7s7$0 1$,726 4,720
revenues, yapvld total $2.8 millian For Stata~ CLty and CnunLy som6►nel.
l'hu C~Ey and Counry siiara uf tlie tr~tal revenuen wculd tatal B275.000 ^sr ~h3ie 100.U%'o 3D.9°a 13.~9'~
y,dc ' q'PieCe mould not, ❑f coursai 6e 55 mElllnn ln "new eaYrsa,'" nar
rdJlt.woal Lax rnvenuea in the amoun[a elated. Some ax7pen4ftq[ee which
Wowl~I otherwise be made in stnrss in sucrounuling caunties wnuld indaed prjn7a1'y ZOn£ 7$,60$ 2$s4b9 4,983 k5y767 4,704
I_e alLraCted L❑ Lha new centar, fwC the pulk of the $55 mLll+oR in ax- Sh?ii0 ~Qa~o ~2,0
i~~iidiLutu~ ~o-tluiated to 6e cap[ured by the wew zrantet wou3d Itn tnn
~absenca nf thc new cranturJ hrs ratalned hy cxiating shQpging centurs anis -
>>ytricts R'hy only new lacal sales tax raversuea wauld Gg genarated
by sales mad~. in tiie new ce«tkr xnat wautd otherwzse nave Waen mkde tn Secondary Zane 56,$75 15,189 Se15P 13,942 4,1$9
PV y_-i:aundsng cGLintLus. Tlie dca[t EFS ahpuld XeF1ecC thia point.
C37 Sylaie I00.0% 26.$% %1%
n nrmilar av4r~-etamntL nF -w cmn3-._°Yn[ ia madn 1n the Yaee ara-
-at+'ti On n~7e 29. Tha Praft EIS estimaLea f~t~ peapYa V~1~~ ■A
et+p!oyed Ly the nux csntee when Ev1Ey eperetlannl. The Draft E1S eEat~s Tz~e Area 135,283 4[~,585 15,016 14,$42 4,487
xri .'iv fcrsc sencen.e chu tast paragragh nn pngu 7g. "An c~atlma_ad l,7en n~rr gnirs Wo.ld he prnvidcd as a direci reeule oE the fu11y, opera- S]1ue 100.0% 30.0% 11.1%
SLOnal pro~ecC " The draft lhen caYcuYates the t4tA1 uALuS Pf thi $ "riCw"
amyloymenL at 514,217.000 - AR amprusalva aum, liowever, s£nco the ne•r
~~n~~c•s syleb would cuk~sta.,tially regrnsent a reaistrinution oF exye^- wSS~1lfk~oR 9~0~~1~ 3~1~5~] l~rj~l~l ~~~rj2$ Se~}7Q
iii~•y Lha! Wou1d oLherwiye ya tG eaiating StoYie LE Can170t t+o asnumad nn /7~
.hlL exLSLinJ sLoC, s rpu]d mJjntA1❑ the &R~i ZCVel 9f CmplOYm[1nC. NI_`'at ~'h~r 1VV.v/O 34.6% 13.C~y
i/p
-•l1d Ue the
emi.loyol,nt loss ut exL sting etoras7 The DrAfC BI5 makeB
1t is ncri reasvnable La asauma chat there xould ba 1,700
ca .~dd ~ eaonal ]aba nOr e nOsr, ailcl[ tLanal payr[ 11 ot' $4,213,000. Sp►{rCe' L]tban j}eagi6R S]+SteRiB, Yl1C .
toKi•iei Ht;J~,iVc Pc.nN AN[1 eONtn,;
11 ; p,.krsiiv Heyiokzal Pianniny Coiifurunca Geiteralisetl LDmprefie+is!Ve
I !an
Valley Mall wsauld maix~y impaet two Spvknne reta~ trrdc distriets: (1)
, L zs 1~1~r~cI [ hat rltis. i,._nct a] i ses3 Cewi~rtl~Ln3 iVa rl ~n ma, a}~~.roved ~e gpAkane CBD, and (2) the 5pokane Valley area (essentlally Unive~ity Cyty
1
~~~5 N~Sin-
: _J L11z S[iukn nL• We2'tol~ Fl~iIl~ L nq CpntpKeflCO 0Ctd66C 1L,
-~k nrece~i as i'c appl aes ea ttia sk11j4ct arQB and PrQ}ect. Tnc nratt !~sL- und ret;ulcrs along East $pragae Avenue). The Mall's cambtned saies impaci on
sc.al_s ;n ti- lact para~~raph on page 571 'Tlie Gen-rplizud ComprQhensivc
'an M.ip zlf cELe ~I~okaniv wctropolitan nrea ;+fevela1xxd 7y the Regional thGSC tWO trade districts is compared tp the grawth in Ttade Arcsunsaiisfied
ii xLy CoraF-l yenarally reflecte the actual land use and zoning clemand Far comparison gvods in the 1984'5.83 Ei7llOW3'
i r = d► s Ab S aL i i ,r
~
. SP[]KANE VtU.LEY AN[] C8l] SAI,E3CAPTi]REf] SY VALLEY MALL COMPARLD T{)
GRC)Wf"!i IN UNSATlSFIEA DEMAND
K~. FYea ❑ayharsh - 3- AgrLl 4. 1970 (lylillioas of 1975 [1aIlars)
Fyi- ehu viclniLy oE the pLoErnsed prpjnpC. Avcording ta Chio I11Ap u 9kYd C~padSon GQodS
alanrs Sull[van hetmeen lni4rstala 90 and Soaoue 1a desionated aar
tural undovrlauo,l cr 'us3 unver seudy--. , 1$98 151$$ 1990
The ]aat stpteloene aluve Ls a mi6interprptation of the map 'The
e3 Nuthoes nsv¢ apgarentiy Sn[erpr,etetl the braak !n 'RuaLdentlal Haiqh- ~],j~~Ct an wB~~Y
F. ~
matfioad° ahadinq alortg Sullivan Ru masn that the acQa alsng Sullivan Ia ~t
r]usiynaLed as 'nyricultural, undevelaped oc llse Wednr Study' sfncr3 there Are I a Retaflers $13.$ $17.0 $20.8
is a mup leqend title vlth that drz$iynntlan kdexrklf[ed 6y a 6ox withaut sha<3inq. Tn fact, howevnr, tpe 6reak Ln ahading along dulitWan merely Ma]] ]TppgCt pp C$j] 23,5 32,2 43.4 "
id~ntafley a neiyhboshaud 6ounaary 6eevean the nBlghhtlrhooda tD the eaet ~n l weUc of Suylivan. 7'ho map was capatcucted using Ch& graphic rechnigue
❑f a 9reak in shadlng ta idenkxfy neiyh1=11[w8 houndariee snd that tec'l- Tptal Sa]eSImfyaCt $37.3 $e49.2 $64.2
n=yue ts aa us[ni thrauqAauk the map for thaE purposa. Yhis smme mis-
intcrpeuta[lon aF tha map •s [eRerred Lp Sfl the faurth garagragh.e€ -
p~yx• a,ne. .
TotaF Trada Area
7'hu 3rraft 1,'1;, states at tfie P1rsL psragraph oA fege 61: "The texk ~~~~sfiea
pci-tion n F the Lowpruhcaaivs: P1an For Spakann CwsnSy (Har¢h 1470) dneig- AA
r+utes thE Reyionat Cammecciat y4narally [n terms of purtatmnnce cclteclA." Saleg PA{eIIt1al 155.2 i(3,']
'ih. PraEt LIS in tlic lmmecilately Pal1awing eenEenca quotsa the eopiplata '
vexi dF a paragraph 1raWlad 'Geneeel' ln f1i8 '1°axt Portkon pf khe'Cnm-
preh'ifsiue p1an vhich para9raph Sa slearly aeparale i.n the Farmat Craa Aesidual `[`rade Area
tlac Eiaragraph SescrSLing '&eqlonal Comme[r1aL.' The quoted paragraph
Cascrihcs CtLtrria rulat►ng tn ail c<unmercial aroae, [jnRtl9fietj5aleg
Ttire tb= hnwUver in ttie uAYas ranh d..•acri6tn "Re Lc nai cnmmercaal•' Pbtentm1 v~th Mall $4.$ A(~i,0 199,$
N ur5~ verY xmanrkdnt «er~'orn~anca stn eCd xhicn a not ment bne n the LTI ilr~Ft siS "Tha-rpyiculAl tnmme[c1a1 araa roquY[os apgtoalmate~y 601007
Ln to 250,000 peopln PLV►ny w[Lhln a reasnnahle drlvinq R1me fat ita sap- ]']iiWeyC;, futllTE 5Wu3 patenUs AT8 $tro11Py A3 ShOWi1y fZle poiential~
oqrt " Ii uquld r'eem agpropriate for tho EIS ip evaluaie the eu63cet
patpnsal fn tcrms pf chle crlkerla wncnincrA lp the tert of tAe Comnre- gm'Wth lYl tUtal T[aa6 AFC,1 SS]eS of C6ItI;3a=Il gpC1dS g[CaL]y E7CCCL'dS T.hp5BE
'ie isiae ~']axi, 'Phcre is a ctiscuasLnn rn pag9 28 aisd !n a roFeFanes~d estimatcd future sales ca fured &am 'S akane CBD and Va11e SY'eS iCt3II0TSf
Ya rkeC Analys.$ p# kfia Poke~ykisl ealea and drawing pPi+ac a£ the pYOposeC ~ p Y
^uyimnnl dhuppting cantnr. IL as rstdmaSed Chak the Cenear epvld capture (See Cbalt),
s5 Lo 451 oF valley area resiSents de~~artm..nt skare expens9ituras and 15 j1~g~y g~ cen~ters do not create k711IC}iR ' L]IC)1 (~O~ ]1pWCyLre
20Y oF valley ar.~a ruui~luiita exheildlEUCpa !ar other cc~ngqrfspn 4ePC~s. 4'~7F?~Flig Sii}g ~1G LVECf
'C'Ic. braFt exs e[mkea it pngc 29 that 'mhep cnmylotr~, the progoaed redYStriLute futura BtIbILa atkerns and t~l8ICf0IC where S~CS tS7CES 8de
xnnal cent.:r will Jcrwlnate tl uailey markat orea.' Hhae ujlY hs ~ ~ P
Lh~• lrsnd uae linnlicatiQna oF thi~ ia7 Can ohhor Luaines~ dritr1cC8 in the calleeted. TheoreEical sales tax redist~bu~ans creaZed by VaIley A+tall can be
vlcv ❑Iforin2 comuarl'snn~6 cuntinue Co tnrfVe3 Yt some car~not„
1.~hat Six.]ocutloFir Cn landJuse ara lTkcly eo reau]~rzaapr aut very r.alculated by refeiencing the al~crye ta61e. Taxes on retaii sales cQnmst af the
.~gnificant marxot spacea af i.te totaL County ana eecandary Yrede area Wgghjng[qn State 4.6 percent tax pius the 5Pa9cane L'ityJCounty CLi[]lbl[1P.d
L prnjLCtud pnr the sup..r rvgional centur. tpsat [reylanel land use
impacts oiion ~xantinq shoppinq .listricta and canLeea wlll ifto prcy~osed S~£S ~K CYf 0.5 pescent, Eskimated shiFts in tntal sales tax eallectinrls to Valiey
'Lnler crca!Tlieoe aYe iu~paYtanC yueSRiQnb fwt anarrerad in the rarnFt
Is Mall and away Fmm Spakane. Valley area and CHI] mercbarrts are shawn
[n the coiicluciaii~~ 1-an•lYat+h of n.Acriutinn of the Pragaeal at ?3ye belbw'
ri_ Lhe "raEp. Fi5 eLatee `Conyiderzng the loca[ion of Ch3s-sato in
rllniion to Ot4iaY cotm,yrcial actlvitiee anJ tl7u pYaaLnlty ta a propoand
~!ne c.rnuncrei~ i c~niur oc Lha 59oka-e. COUnt} Cnmprehenalaes Plan Ya~ ~E(]R~~(,'1~,, S~.a~ TA]{ ~VMr]~'
]ncat ed at Sgrayue and S4f livanl Lt uaulr! nnC appeae [har [hia usa rF ' ~~•i•U~~~BY „~QI~
rh~ siSe wrtul~l be ue,•ea.enul~le ° The InFeience that the laCaklan 4` L`4
lSPOK.ANE VAA.LEY ItND CBU R@TATLERS
(T'hausands oP Cottstanf 1975 I]olIrus]
, Rsdistrihuted Tax Revenucs
I980 1985 1990
From ValYeey Area ftetaileis $704 $867 $1,061
From CBA Retaitefa 1,198 1,542 2,213
~
However, it is YrigYuly unltkety that such tax re►renue redisiributinns wiU
ever aetually mcur. The reasnn: aUnv+e tax data dv not reflect the esMmated
gmwth potentials in Trade Arca sailes tax teyenues. 13ased upon the earlser
Ma. Filtil Gaphdish - q- Apri 1 a, 197b Projected growth in Tradc Area unsatisfied sales potcntial, ft is esfinnated ihat
thc ccrrrespnndlng grrswth in sa1es tax revenuss (constant 1975 dakiars) will be
ss+tj~et pro7ecc ie rudnnifaLlu 4ecyuse oF ita pruxlmlty xo the Plan msp $3.7 $a.]y 3[1Q $13.4 miftion in 1980, 1985 and 1490, ICSpeCl1V0ly.
desiynaliOn at Speagu~ aiid &ulllvun 1a cUmlctuly unwarrantad, She
SEirayue-SulLivan sSku fe ciearly sicuinnated on Lhe plan m¢p aL ChaC
loeatLOn and rioncral "LUum~escial" znEZing has keen asCahlidhed ak tfiaa The «lEOiCtICAl [edisfribution lSf rCtall QITipIO]+i't1E11t dUB tO Spakane
sneersecLion in conformance wLeli tho Plan. Ttie canclucliny etatqwent xt Aq
pag. s, yL VaUey 14la11 can alsa he estimated. Using U.S. Census• data, real sules per
"'_n a(lditaun th)a aixe ~s crtnsietenc wiLh rhe locational e!!'1~110]~C8 11i SpO'~SI18 ~.`DWIt]~ ~IlEi'8] merchundise Sfo[CS Ap~7IA7L.11S13iC[i
~I~.=Formance s[andur~ls as sE•t Pprkh In tha WxL ot thu 1961 $41,500 ln 1975, D1Vldlilg pID]@Ct0(] eomparfson gaods sales hy tFus figure
Lq%n.ehenslve 1'lan "
pravides emptuyment estrmates as Folkuws:
1a a c.ei,~•ari.ca1 as3urtlnn th.*t du not SiJrCRRCCCI by the anaYy6is con-
1P Lht flraf r I.I'• l'hL 'E..xt k~arLSan Of thc• ComNrehensiva Plan _
u~~nE~l i~ -lya firsi ya , .~y~-„Nli ~~n p.~ye 61 ziicluJes eeuerai auh7ecl5 which Tl-EEQRE~~CALF,RlPIAYMCNI'IMI'ACI'
-^'~x. aay& bhvul.i be analyivd in avaluaikgo ❑P akl camue~'ctal uteaa.
:'~ivae xncludu analysib oF the impacL upon [ho surrnunding clrcviaelnn OF VAT.LEY MAI.:L
~ntier.n, analysia af gccasg pelntx tD surcounding aereate, relationahiy -
n~ t'Se si[e design tp rhe builcltnAa 1n the at'ea, pokentSa] nubsanta -
`~crars auclv us naise, lzyn[, odors, acc. !hn Cae[qarical Imyact 19$0 1985 1990
AnalySLs saccions aI the E[5 inCludc seterunce to many of those auh7ac:.e
°rt whicli eE[es.tyve 'mLL , q~L incJ nLca5uteff' are not assured und/ac xNich
n•usi. 6v reyardo3 :as having "unavoidav]¢ adverse 4mpacr." Ie is adroft[ed,
- - - -0V -aapie, enat thd Sureunndlnq scr.re &yscem and cnu trnnsray irwr- - TZStai Mall ErltglOyFt].0nt '~•zn~e are rucsently lnadeyuuic ta hanJln acldltdonal traEPlC anLLClprlted CreajEd 1,094 1,304 1,540
.js cx [esult ut Lhe pro)uc.~L Siic3 LfkaL mudns of curcecting tbese dafielencies
aru not nssureci, It la arS~uaLte3 Lhai the aolueinn Fcvr EIrqVIdSP~J AlXe ,
~_ve.s.~ and iLnprnving xrrafFir mpv.:m.:nt alony Sulilvan 'Ya nue raadL:y ES1!10
Ly'1 a3t5z--vr• t and wi]! ieyui rc FtirLher stOcly pp the Cauaty Engl,nee[ing f7eptirt- p ymentImpacts:
C1 - ren_.- 1t, 1a admiLced sn Lhe diacussioq oF nnia5, llylik and oisie Lhe!t ValtcyArea 333 41[} 501
t~+e'~• wau1G ha signiPkc.,ant 1mpaC1.B. l'Ke EIS authors suggeeC aevera'
n+sti•~~i•nn ~easures thttt khey say spuuld be deslgned and incocpora•_ec SpakaneCSU $66 776 ],(}4(
n!o ehR plan Gf the {iro7ucG to reluce Chaae Smpacrs. The mlnR here •s
:hat whAla ehe sitr ia,.v cleei ly canEorm to 8ame lvcati6neTcrYCaria can-
tai ned in the text nort ion nF t ip an [e.y. Lt l~saa+~
maior LRrouyh atr4E proxzmaty ~ AS Wag ~lC Ci15C ►5'It~l l8J[ reYEilIlB (I17k15~C't3, 1{ 3S VeT}~ unl~kely that
ty~h~re a[e man m- acha roe~
•ti,st xarrant the r.ateqarical cnncluaion-thaE-the o ta cana ntanY u1[S anything othcr than minvr emplaymcn# dislucatians in the near-ternn woWd
h~ 1_cattanal nertoemance seandarrls ❑F tne Camnrr:hene ne P an
makenalixe. 5trang growth in comp$naan gvois sales (iherefore retail workers)
2~] CU1u0LirVL4I aebtynrtlrsns wt tlris locat.ion wopjd prrc]ude t]11S from happening. Lfslng earlier projecti4ns of unsatisfied -
^h._ iass nar.i,Jrazh on L.3,_i.. 57 statGs "'ihe area adiacent to 1-4C sales patenhais, rouglily 6,350 new warkers will be reguircd hy 1990 in the
In actu al a us a Freewaycnnurtircial at~ri The use oE kne tarn
"sLrt~~" uiCh lta normel connoLataon oE unp al nned ..ommcrcEat devalap[ner.= .5,}Sp~Call& ~'I~S Area ta mcet the increased demand for comparison gc►ads.
struny out along an arterial scema pdrticulasly inapproprSata Eo agply
to the u" t) ng Red flnn -se<vSce stavlrsn caap9ee on the eaat sSde c° Mareaver, SCCClI1CIaY}I' CR3pIa}+!'F1Ct1t11I1C0131e illipacts have nat been cansidared.
s
L'ullivan ExaminetLUn aF Rhc shte developutent and the xoning aCt3on ❑f
tlie blie (=niLially appr0v.11 }n Apr11 7f 9969, 8E-94-6B) reveal tha; thF
.SUVUlof~:nrent ls actr.ually a!ul ly pla.ti iu.l d6Velafxpent in acc4zdance wLCh This p[+int ks well taken.
:he r.1e'hce uxaitxnu umciftcaiiun oC •_he ?reewsy Comncraial zpne t~
~ Since Reoonai Gommerraal is a subcategary oC Comrnercial the General
cnmments should apply to Regur►ai Commercial as well as all categories of
cnmmerraal includad in the text.
According to 5po&ane County Planning DeparCment esumates based un
+~5 buiiding permits, the 1976 papuladnn for tlte East Suburhan area amnunted
to approxuna'teIy 75,000. This arsa consists predaniinantiy of the 5polwne
Valley. Tlie Rath,drurn-Post Falis area of Idaho had a 1376 estimated
populatiun oF approxmately 14,000. Thus approaimately 90,004 persple lived
wtthin the "Va11ey-arca" 01' the propnsed project market area.nc populativn
a
S i t ~ ! ~ i Alk r a ~
~
projechons for this "Vallcy area" fnr the year 14$0 are in axcess of 100,000
, gevple. FurthermQre, the populatian fpr the City o[ Spnkane is prajccted to
be in exccss eF 1$0,000 far 19$0L Assuming thai 25 minutes is a remonable
M, k«a uay,h8rssh - S' April a. 4979 drivtng time far u regional center, a significsnt partion af the City's papulatian
Wsv falis within the propased projects suppvrt area.
As nated in the iird[L L1:. n lAnd area on the weei slde oF Sullivan
.,uyL. of Hiasion is aleG xUned A1eewryy CGnumrcial. Examina t lOri of the soning Fi le 8E-qf1-70 uir kl~,at pr.ajott r,dpn]a thac at a19o ie conaicto,.ak `I'he abilyty of the remainder of the ather retail disfncts af the V~fep and
unon e nef■iliLv duvelopmanr piao uhSCh snGiuaea tcanaitLonak muici- ~ty a~ ~F~ne fio thrive will depend on fiheir abt7ity to campetc in a Frce
taniily uso si~d sereaniny 1~eeasc~.n tha proposed tree.wry caomarcfal Epcilittaz
- 5nd the siny]e Famlly [e.ldehtlnl udas to the west market environment. It is pmba'trle that shart-term lnnd use s}►i€ts vs+ill aoeur
9`he [~re.exay C~mmr3rc►al cvncept vr~s inenr,~oraea.~ Anto the text poction zetated to the suceess anri faikure u£ indipiduai husiness, tl9WCYEf, the niajor
aI th~- C~unty Comgrehunsave PFan Ly aravndmene in 1964. The Yreaxuy Cam-
vur:icial Zonrx was incoc-porre"[ into the Cqunky Ordinaace late that Ba~ ~ ~ ~~~g as thCy ICIlIe.n COIf1pEht=vCs should adjus[ and CAfltIIiUC tU
yuar (.7unr: t964) . Th[+ text partion pp the Comprehrrnslva Plan Maa furthsc remain riaUle. PYe= see Appendix E for further inFflrmatsun re 1'f21It '~tlC
a'neni'e~i x.n 1470 rofinlny the languar~~t pf tYte Preeway Cwwaertlal 8ealgna- = ~L
t=on. several xrceuay Cc*Mnetcial Yariua havo 6ean aakd4ltahed at inte-- . p4tElitial R13IICBt 1Iilj18CfS QFtY1L' g.iOpoSed pI[]jOCt.
~-l, Ony_e wr3s}, of Spokanu ancl in Lha vayloy. 1lven [hnuyh Soqq pf khape
r-e_tYe the 196H Guneralizud catnprchensive P$an HRp, they arq pot ahoaR thcmnn pecauso t1tuy wern rc~nrded (as vare naiyhEiarhood buainasa disfirac_s)
as Ue1=1y 6ulux th¢ kcvul nf regianal alghiFlcspce` xhkch the GennXUlAaer~ p~p~ "
A 6~ a I3raft ET5 is tp pxbride inFurmatinn and discl6se the
Crnnuru4iensive 6'lan depicte paaba6le impacts O{ a proposed proJect. In doing so mitigating measures are
'llia text pcrrtiun oF thL Caunty ComprehCnelre Flren alao eantaSna, Sl1 *}~C~eL~ WfllCti a'~YE IATC[li'~8d t6 'Fef~ACe t~18 lill'~15iCtS 6f 'ltiC ~][O]@Cl 50 (fi8t 'lt
-~n.! zlid lirior tu 1969, a dusinyatlon n4' "Reqi~snal CamwarciaS" ar Wa~2 4Q ~ ~rite~ia W~31..C]i ATC 3{1 plan text or applica6le federal~
"s "ConrLunfty Cc~mmurclul" arn1 NeighDorh4pd Cpmme[cid3'. lfbny lffcatPunu ~e
d ~Csted 1n the
tLLLiiiy the texc descrepcicsn ❑f 'Cpmmunity Cammarctal" Bnd/or "Aeginnal gtatg gn(] GQUiIty tgW$, goficws tu►d/oa,gu.{derines. It ts the responsibility of the
Coauncrcinl" :sre 9ISOWry ran Lh3 1968 CnnrralL88d Cau,prnhanelVO Plan Hap
as 'wa jor Comilarcial Areaa' hut no such desianncian !e aho+ns aE the rCSpoi1S(blC agencies uad tlte deveivper tn insure that these conefitions +ue met.
N ereQwaY - su l]Lvan inRurchanae nnr in ea at anv of the val av ~r- ~f the fdentifiea ~e consldBFSd r7Iid the S11gge5YCd T►{3lbgAtirig
L-1 cha~i,ea.
~
In ssumnaity, Nhatvvapr the m.asits of ihls g[yppsat may Le, ~!t ro re- rneusures (as well as furttisr measures wtuch rriay 1e develaped) urc made a
senza A dePinito d-arture frm the 1460 mC reheneivr Plna map vhich GUA(~'~1ot1 O'~ '~71a'il ~7i6j@Ct AppTpy3~, these l~atianal perFormance St3TIt,~[d9
c_early aoeB nat conYamjt]at8 .7 awyoc regxnn~aT911cpping eentBr or majer m~~
•e:ieral comroarciat araa ac thia lacatSOn. inscaad, lt ls apparent that
Lha Cauiity fsas dnliLerakely desiqnatnd b7CA Sldsa oC SulllYan Smawdiately
o4_h of I-90 ns beinq apprrprSato foc F[eeway Commprclsl uee 1n araprd-
_<<ce uittti criteria Sn trie texC nP ehe CampSeheneV[e 81an and aOnlhg Th8 CO313EE7(t lIi Wb1C]1 ~sft1p3" was tigpd fn thjS CasC W7g ROt d11CaI1t SI11t$
r.r,llnance ana has tnken paana an eho appraval af crtaea altea ta batfer a
thun from ad7oanang axlsk=n=I anr3 pkanned rasldenYlal use. The prnPt ~ormal cflnnotauan" but as meaning a lang, narrow piece, as oF1und.In the
e[5 at pago dY an1 62 ca17s atcancian tq the lSkely preaaure thet wi11 SCILSey howeyer, th3t }Iff5 bee[1 lnTe;C'~, t}ys5 dgyg] itleIit 4rSl9n 5`LL~IVA[i,
3evFloy fLf any Airo7ec.k ;y aE~ptareAb Far pddktiGnal commarcis~l dBVelon- ~ ~ $
rns:nt in the viefnaky and urges ehat "Lancf Ilas polaciqs npw be devaloped bCtWBC13 I-90 an$ Braadway) IS RDt StTfp commercial devetapment lll 1ts
tq retard the prnliFe[wtaan ai caamercaal usea....' Therp han Been 4•~f° ~~~y~ ~~~~ti~an.
~~ressUra fn[ avme tiinr_, u( Cnurba, fmr gener5l caaaeraipl davelopmant nomj $aa[ lhe Mnllvy inteXChaiiqcs. Hhon the FXee+Iay CouunerclA1 xoneS at th►e
anLuacliangu were appenved 4.n 1969 aru9 1971 an EIS mlght vell hava Lean
wi-dtten urqing thUk Sund uecs yuLdak►nea and polSaYea 6a deyelapeq to ~ As nuted in the araft EIS (gage 57' L$ild USE, paragraph 4 and pagc
Assesr~t Lhat t1}e Frccway Cramm,rclal 8asiea nat p[ovlde the atLmu]us.zo
E
, ruii fe rak.sun nf Cnmmurcial uses in the vicinlCy. Ik miqht va1l tsa 59, LSIIa USB Pl1h Map) no OoI11171@rc1d] IDC$ti6R 1$ dOSlgflaW M1t t}10
arqu_d tf3. r..Y.xnt olan and znnkn nllpws Fo~r.--a. ro r~iati conmect.ai I-9a/Sullivan interchangc. 'I7te co~nmer►tiel 1~atiQn t]133 1S dESI$(1~tCd ].S
- es- at this 1¢cnk[on a[sd~~ect~~y prov Qia B?'6fP1te Cantalnment an@
,IFerlnn fYrnn ~i
aTaininn L~xx'sitn _g and. p an e-d~3enetai~Zo~ncr - 1ocatgsl st the 1litel9eCtlarl pFSullivan Itoad aild 5prigue Aventle,
^ sh~:':. ~~c'~n•s=- 7Ere tiiao tn elaahern dasr la naw.
~ 'I'f►e CFeneralixed Comprehensiye Pian Mup (1968) is a sencraiixed plun.
~Q According fa "Pnriciplrs and Prnctives ai Ushan Planning„ pulskished by the
3ntemational City Managers' Association (196 •`Ccnoral mcans tlzat the pian
summarixes ga3icies and prnpasals and d¢es nvt andicate speciric IncatiaMS ar
detailed regulalions". Furthermore, `•[t]he gencra1 pLzn is the officW
statement vF a municigal legisZuti►Fe hody which sets farih its major policies ooncerning desxab).c future physival derelopment°'. The plan is nat a rigid,
inflexihPe dvcumeni and it is meant tv refle.ct the pohcies nf the camrnuruty
dluough the iegWative bridy. TTius, as these pol3cies change, sn msy the plan.
TheteFore, the dccisinn at' wtietlier tQ depari from the exisGng plan in the
Farm of changing policies ar not t❑ depart frum the plan is a decision that
wC.' L'Lea ❑aylka3-e1s - 6- nyt LI a, 1976 must be made by tha Bv:ud oF County Commissi oners, lf sUrh is the case, khen
a change in the cvmprehe"ve ptun may be aeqnired an arder ta allow the
w•HnP eic proposed aQne cliange and develepmen#.
7'Ite authars oF the UraPS. i:iS have adequately diacrus6ed the pot,antaal
ti°nifi[. sncreases and impacte. IG is agreed that puhlxc atEdtudeu tu-
warJs hu F tlw aut(xnouilu yrznecdlly excludes major cnnaldpraridn G~ 5olutians rv the traffic carculation probIems in the site nicinity will be a=t use u ~J
af alternntive mr.xies for miklynkAny tralL►c Lmpacte. The mielyatiny I113tCE,C Of 1e(~ES1,~Iilqg .~il[1 cxpanding the 87ClStlllg network along 5ufliw.~r1
nicueurea the Oraix EFS propased arp nOk aHSUTnd dup ip FWiding unCer-
ta:at ies ax.r1 y~e~l~nvly wall na! ua all that eFfective in graaGly rud~cLna i~etween I-90 and S prn g ue and tl~en rocei►na g fundin g for the neeessar y work,
~niicne am~oagiSniabliue re I[tGfuPfl[hac} E+t AJ~oLla.r,mae On ImpacespayS". 95 of the aLhouthorare sF atta[oEIS• , uAde Tharrp Sppte 6'F []ug fUil(I.ittg Iriay come fresm federal r9lld StYte SOl1.[CCS, Wlth S6II1C
nkny bE an unavaidah2e impuct on the residents Uf the area, in that any fL11d5 flQiil tt1C CQii11L]1. ThE dE►felpper must be SllbS't8lltlaUy 1ttVO1V0d 'lIl
LraCFa❑ dncreas~i m,,ic~ht be caissxdered us adverse' (emphasls added)
G1uun t}iu maon[l.iirra oF >ace[c1 traFFic incrcasc thia ia an incrediLle f1111ding SOllltlpfLS t0 tti£ tiaffiC AIf1Q3Ct& d1Tectl]t CIE3te(] bjl t]i@ plClppSg[]
un[tCCyL:fL•~if~~}t ' pmject. it is tughly doubtful that the project wauld be approred unless
^"C t't}At ITY impcssvcments are made 1o this e7asting circulatian netw6rk.
^hn CnrLun Mociox=Lle ❑raFt EIS 43scuesion in eeve[al Iacee tkirough-
uut t3l~ EiS, {~a~J~es 1. 3y ]Y. 90-A3]refeience ie ma ¢ Yo rrte carbon
mc~~nxide onYluti~an impaGta, A greet tleaof 1cAta Yeiaelve ta th H~pro-
Mem I7-presented;howoVor, therp ia the hasic 5864mptLon tuade that Fut're
feuerrvt emaseion atandarJa will mYCiyaY4 the rvySanel allgpping CaqCor's
imO~ac.ts rusulClily an luwer than pcesent OD luvels. Thia 8s9umption ie
=u]uLively wcak caincu tNeru is yood r5a8oR Co bel7eve thak fedeYal emtsaenn
6m,-ta6lys may not Ge meC. 'Chc> reactione a[ rhe amarjcan aµeo lnduatry
alorig bI1Lf1 ampending cunflaits wlth erssrgy and econamic conaidatotarns ry~] P]B83Q9CC ICS~74115£ N4. 15. ~
r~clucc thr 1Lkv13hQOaS uf nttviising tlie eChpd4lwd emSsslQn atFUWasdB, VL L
'ikia Final BIS blis~iild incticate Eda ytronq posel6illty of hiqher Co 1evels ,
~ P f1__OjECtef7 in thie nracc.
is si~keJ Llyuk suaypenIJeJ paYtlculete prohlemB in tha araa sre
~ riuL n.feqvaLCly orJdreaaed. 6ata sugypsra YhaY the suapepded pa[titul,ate
svvLls curren[ly are aC or vcry near the etate and national stanaaraa. Tlicie will be a shght increase in sespmded pancculates as a result aF the
=_ncrnasecl runvemene activity, ev..n vn paved eltreeta and garking aseas wi2'
leiid io a L Lqhtly lncseASe pas►1tuLAte cancenkratlOna. HoYe attentian pzaposed praject during lts operatsanal phase. T}1C gni11ai]r CDritlibE1tOTS tU tIEe
5!10u1L! be -iivon La Lhis matt..~r Ln Lhu LrefY eis. suspended parbiculate pm6iem in Spokane Coesnty is traffic an unpared rvads
• 40110. PUI i.u•rrnn, (50 pezcent of tvtal emissions and 75 percent during the falt montris) and
'flzu Sisswn:x,irn oF noizo LmPact, pages 50-56, adoyoaLply praeone.a the agneWtural acuvitY. Thnre is information available from twn mQnitnring
~iLuation causud Ly che ilroposcd seginnal ahopping cr:ntar, iimwaver, cho ~A 5t1t10n$ ![I the stte nciruty: Flara RQad, 8p]iifl7(lIl'l1LP,.j]+ one mile nartheasts
-
1•oitie imp,>ck nn rhe nearLy YesldantlAl at'ea appeata ta be qulta B1gnlPlczn[ T
.,rul Prvpvbid miLlgatinq meuaurea da nqt asem ku ac9eguately reduoa ihls ansi Esst Valley High Schovl, agproximat~y two miles nirtri. The readings far
iinN,.cL L'veil CEiaso aiva"avs that ara praposed ueem only to ba recamnendztl^-•: ~~V,~.~, ~'QI Sfl
ot ~~•c nraEt Eis auchors sact~er Ehan eleueats uf the proposal ttaele. 3 1976 alid 1977 3fC Jr8 g/m and 53 m$/It] . fTTte state standarc3
~,l , n11e nn,u ~.H~,ur,u HAI'LI+ is 60 mglm .J The site is vutside of the `L'' non-attainment area wliich
extende easf onl%r as far as Fines Road.
i+tivEf/A1isofyr-icn .en.i L-und HaCer Qualaty •ss iao: adeourGefy ar:dses=_e"_
~ The development oF the prapnsed praject wauld r,reate tliree generdl
noise impacts: (1) cvnstructian activrty which is cxempt under WAC 173-60 as
long as it docs nat occur betwcen 10:00 p.m, und 7:00 a.m.; (2) traffic naise
an ,puhlic sfrects (Broadway, SuWvan, Conklin, Flora etc.) which are also
excmpt under WAC 173-60 when under complianee with WAC 173-62 (Motor
Vehicle Naise Fedormanc.e Standards); and {3} vetucuLu and other sounds
generated un the prolect site dunng its agerationai phase. "f`he maximum
allvwahle noise le►rel received hy un off-site residential gmperty from the site
is set at 57 dBA. The noise levels hy mi site traffic woutd normally be less than
64 dBA {fvr a sgced under 20 mph}, The prnvision of an earth herm along
Broadway would prande ai least a three dBr1 r►oise reductivn vs+htoh wouid
'result in cvrnphamce with WAC 173d0.
~ ~ r► ~ ~ a i i t i
qc KG-d bayhnrsh -9- Aprll 4, 1570
in CIlte dl'aFt EI`.i.. Sinuu Lhn Ci Ly Gf Spokaiju u6pplnB d[9 crikSrG VaCur ~i 55 ~~toper will plan and p~ride a syst~n fnr dis~~a.l af sanit;~ry ~nd
siiptily from Lha V,a]luy aquaPur, tlia clty in Loncarned uioout anp pouslblu Y
po7lutian oP chSo irutar ayakcm. Te 5n nater3 that tha 1206 Waeer Study•
ds n4t yQt cdmg7eter cranse:qusnt9y the Csraft eig leL'4 oAny quaeEloae un- stonn sewage tha# wiU pompty wlth a1i af the graidelines o8 the apprcipriate
4nuxureA. Tho City cakos the poaitian lhat unt17 bduqusta ertdence p[avvs apnr3es gQVerrung thew aysiems. Thase agenCies would inciude DSHS, IADEr
thtis RenEmsaIl xill noi Pc`i11utO [hn aguiFer, khn derelaper shauld prr+vfde
;sclcqtintr: advan '~SpQ~fte Caunty Hea1tR District S!!d tt1C S~TCt~CepB Caunty Engneenng
cCro atawni ~F hoYh.nanAeury eerl eEarm earnge.
1'O^.Tt1'("lAl. L[ABI[.lq'y D?p7[ZR16FLt.
,
Whon spuaific adVursc eayirnnaevncal lmpy.&.a aaa identiPsad whfch
-Luzat or may ifot. 6k5 miCiyatod isuch an ai[ quallty db§tud'atloni watar
cjuiillCy duyradatlon, tioLae polluCi9n, traLfic cang7akAan, qr public
saFyGy Iiazardsl , the Crsunky may decnmu 11oGln Foc damayEie rhLch rosult ~~p,p ~~~rhvriiy.
1ry permiccl~~g thO FsroFsoa~al eo prc~ceed, shse rccent a~ndmunta ta SePA
L']v5rly gyves agsnc[ee Lha euhstaniive bnthOr1Cy to reduce ur aVOLd '
patential l"cta srliitts haya hesss ldnntLFied. Some ulsa leQl thle
CaY6' 6{38 w i th i t nn 4qua ] r.:a3anns1hi l i ry crkaCLng an exgasu'rc tn 11 ahi l i My I]1C1c 8-TC I1p CQII[4 L1eC1SlOIfS at '~i1S t'lttiE f.j1$ti CIG3~}~ 9O St3tE,
:or 1 a) iiura to adazqua [,a1y red~sce or svoid advursa Smg~iets.
[ wfsli ca roci7mm=nd btruiiyYy tliat the Snfarm5tlon taSsxelva Lo tho
~•.~3~ticsn vf rhis ¢Itioppif~q cantcr ln c]tn hiorarchy at 6I361]@Sn9 cnntnro giease sce tl~c ~vnom[c analysis incIuded in Ap~nJZ.x E.
unsS ~~.~~wu:rsinl dmvolc~pff.:n[s nE ihu Cley/Couney rngfon. needa co 6e
aJ.3ruuacd camFsruh3nslveiiy. s}wciPlcolYy, tlia c:f[es.Y ❑I the stsrsgglng
z.:nLar an klie c1oVnrown la ccltLCxt amppcC oF ih18 Ccmprehenalvo x4wLew. -
I U~lluve the Valley eatll proEwsii1 rrnuld be lncowpLnea vLeh[soi a
economic a«alysLs cf the uzeuatlan.
y} -L mmtuld a=Spu.ar thri a e-ster o[ Lhis scula wzll [ndsed unfavarah:y
[S'1 0^pj4t :hrE nYea And cermuwe..sal duvelayrmant nav prlseln9 La t'ha mcsteQpc~`-[;,-+
l(] .sytu, iri F-rklcular, the dika9 G6n oP thn CiCy and CuunCy, qfa 6ollevp
the -'cnter {a dn cnnik[rt, x[th tommerclal pi7lnning khraughnut the FKtro-
pn3iCan Area . E elio County, includiA,} RhR CAty. Xu laali4va tlis arSAskeuatia^
rc a Laprr Rugianal ShoFsping Centar at thls lacaikaw xould hnve BignlPitbr~
ditranwneal imj...cta tliac ncecl tv be meio fully vvaluutuA.
Vury ~Nly paura, . 'rqrry cluy9 ~fJ '
planning Rirecta[
f, I•~; V9Il .Idm
A: t ..ch~rw:,U
IlOv~ 1'I G4L }t Fn. SI iL }14 1 li lli 1 I 4 1u1 [ 00
V P. Call
' GlLn A. Y,ik.z
■
A[Luiluuuot. FXed Pdpharell -
City ❑F sEiuk~iiu I,and IlSC plan P~lxe.lea dnd MytropotEtun 6°]rn
- 7'izg Ca[y's Laetid lfsi Plan pclizdGS setatu the Pollasrln9 Qn paga 90
+ !-Eding Cnmmerc¢E1 [,.nd I]se-
"Seron-i CenLrdl Rbisinesy 6iu[YiCt. 7yse Cen1ra1 8ueinrsu F7Ia[Y1Ci
:n :,yjxa§ane ehcu]v aanaygt ❑f st4ra.>u. ryff6CE•S, 9uYVlCs cu[eh;i5hwonLpo
fIGLQ3~, goVr.ihm~nta l, culLUra1 and ~ruayuV~Iiil, ~dnturn ik the cont ral
io:.+il goin[ QC tho CiLy'a ncturiul and trancportgtion ayskem whecn lY
.~n ~•nr~veniunkly ssuive [he HnpulUCion of khe a~Crg~ditan area and thn -
[i~l.~nd gmptize ulth a varied and apucl$liaZd sxiectinn qF goada and
' cvlcua It an =n[unded t3iat the Crxntrsl gusiness fSiatYlCt 95e Btrcr]g
a iid nnt dec.enl.ralixud amanq larqp Csutlying cammslRity and reqianal -
sliOl.piriy centcr¢. Th~ C.B 0. 8hoald 6e moderniZed, low fee ppcking
ccuapa..tit¢ac g1[h cueH parksng provid-d, and an ntteactive landscape
d.vc 1 ape d.,
'Lim7teL1 Ja:y~innuk s~i.~~ {;viitlra. The Ccntral Businesa fllacrict
.incl shoulcl i'Qm~ n t id I~ rogiGin,~I B[IGPPiILy center rP tha Inlpnd Empi[e.
f4-Niisc: th, mutropa] 4tJn .3rea bxtunds darth~r nprth and eant qF khe
_.riiLe'al Busancus Divttic.t ifinn it doan to [he sauah anA trest, a ma4afit
u°li6na1 sholzWinq Center comp4duwn[inq thu C.6,Ls, and &e1'Ving a major
:eymene pf the motropeli[an areU id Cpncecvahda ta Cha north and nne
tu r.)ie s.asi. FJrsrthtnun te~ the nart3~ and univv=rsdey CS[y to the east
-n the sentc•r u~' [9~u Spuk,~n~ vollcy ure canAit}cred ta be aeasQn51 ehop-
cLnters '
~ '1110 nruft EiS clLDUld inqlsi-lu and cecognfZp [he a6pve pplltxea
~ wnLGh apipact tfiu S~.c~kdna vallay ag well aa the inlajid tmpits RraBa
At ea
'r7~L !1t'1L HGF'L3LITAN Pd.nn IPaq- 65!
°LOwmerclal aruae, 'Plw s:entLdi lsusln- f7LseclCt of Spokane 1s
l'i.~ h ..~rR o£ CsrmRerCiil ~leve]opmonL aa [II~- mcirnpnllkan area. The
'-71r shnppircg NrZan at Naxtfiiaen aixcS at tiniveraity CiCy pravida a
"I4' Ji0Iiu1° SeL VICV tp Lili. nf5[ Lh Hfld thy e3yt [Oi Y lOhb OE Ch6 motr{)pol3 p(ir
~ TI~4 plin shawa 'Gummunlty' bustnpas dl7trict locistiana xhicA
NrovaS~ shopµing fJcilitius for a ssubaeantial purtian of the metrrpa!itan
4Cher major ~:oiicuntx.~[iario ❑f Luslncse or de5vy enm~erCial actfvSC.y
,i-e~.ilsa shosrn an t]su Plaii Hfnar nafqh6othoa4 husineea distrle[a
.Eric3 vLn r minoe• pustness 3rc.b3 ary not ahwn Qs ih1a Cen~vralizmd Xetrp-
f,ultcan f'la-1."
°1'Is, Pl-.niW; fuc 61i:,+1<....a i-M,wicu:. tl-L thc tradg areae which
:"W110Et cs~omerclal ,~d.t,iv4tnr.s aara ~s0k liwLted hy palltfcal iurlg-
~:csk on•
~
AL
l
sP:sr ii, 1910
Mr, 7h- xloshcr
Spokanu Councy Plsnnfng ltepattmene
Horth B11 ]uPfersun
Sgukane, Vash[ng,or< 49201
SLa• Fnvdcormenasl Iepscc s¢atcmen[
]amea 6 6lre1, a.d i'a.'a =
Faoonaad Ve11ev Ne,il
~aar F~ Haahar• The ioiln,Lng yuescltns nrsd cramcn6a fur addi[!an aud/or c6gngc eoocnsning [ha
418 on ~hn prn,pucad :hopptng cenr.QS ac BraoAwy aA 9.~11Svan haro 6ean cvmpiles
and~ox revSedeS by c cn rned cirsxens a[ ¢he araa. lha arcumpany isg algnature■
ecteac co approval o![he can[ent nf chese e~enE..
Page l, 4th psragraph. ].aodu¢ea ia che t{.clnS,ty aro IieCed Lur I
Pleasse sefer tv page 57 section a., 2nd pgragisph, linc 9.
~:s~icvr.i z. o~sea, rn~ ►otn is.e
+l:o ececas Chac Cheaere4ge yarsel• ue
!n a acac~. ut tranattion. ~ec (cek chls 1
slwuid eaq chat scme ecreaga garcol. aas Cha.nge ta reazl :Ecnntain s~reage parceFs (ane to ten ucres), SqIlEB 6f
9s~ a ataea of cran$Iti~i, '1VWCh 9n 1I1 [i StatC Of tI'1. ILSltiCk11 t0 fi1ghCr a0'ASltj7 pla1tS". .
Page i, Slh persgrayh, 7ch 11rse, va qurs4lan Wheeher xhe fcdcral aucwanhile
emiaafon ~a-dard, shwid miei~ea chn
lmgacca of lnereace.d Auc~mohila traf[te., i{J
Page 2, lae Full peragraph; Tc a~c~w an sdrq~ata enr fra~atal tmpacr ~e fe~~ e~~oy s~,~dartls havc naF Ztecn ef£ct[ive. Please ~fer to thc
rcesppnse to the Spokanc CQUnty rLir FpIIutivn Control Authori4y, respunse
'
~
ealatemena c d e ~hou}d erq[sle Cha 4senilad design NO, 15,
Qj S.kdy ea~alop en FAGquqye ttaw pacism d
~ fur [ra[FLc, ralhor thun c¢aciag ic vill he
requ4red. Th£ purpose oF a draft enrir[snmental impuct statcment is to snlicit
Page 3, 4ch paragraph, Sth linn; "Cosc. uT rvad malnceaansa MI incraaas..." eamment, e~eca.a11y in the planning stugeg of a psr~jcct. At I~1iS ~191i1'L t.IIE'j]I3[{S -
]
tY~rr vnrdg'Fuy" hweld he ccreagchened Lc for the prvj$ct ~ eariveptual. As the pr~ss continues mnra rernement will
eama[kin likn `~u11N",
take ,plasae, such as detailsd design studieL E"urthermore an udequate soluttun
Page p, 41.1, paragraph Thla spoaka ei xhe ayulfer running apgrmt-on
tp the trnfCc ffow circntntivn ~FSittCrR ~lVtl~ bE 3 IE(i
aly SO' Leaeat9~ eha aiee surfaeo, .ehiln
mnt
Li.l~ll1C/!t FOX [IiC 3~7~1IQVA ~Cff
paga G6 it atuLSa ihe 4epth to ka ~a~ - eu~_ the p~jectr
5da rak Pax cunaiatency and xef~ing co da[crmg~
che deyKh mnre paecisalg.
Page p, 7ch poragrayh Ae9 agricuT[ural co khn avmd ehnc ahurt cha TlEw COSr$ Will II1CSCaSCe t!L( im,pmvemene of the raad netwnrk in the
@ @ sife ►•icinity with impraved circulation and raad surfaces muy n4t increase
Page lG, ~!nd pnrugrnph, Scp line• "Suma Gangeatlno occurs c cha,,," Sama ahould jCI)gi5 iIS ~~I$GV£ teI1IiS,
bo dals[ed--eangaatiw xcura,
' Page f6, 3sd pnsngraph Ye ehoull keQV de[LniteLp if tRz [ira hqdranta The elevatian wacer Icve1 af the ~uiFer aFong a garticulas csrrss sectiun is
aldng BTa~cd+.Ay sm1 neaa [hs f[ad Lian a[e '
asfnyunto ur ooc Iac the gerpaaal Alaa, *ae ~T 6~ +reiatively cnnstant but depth to the aquifer ►iaries luc.ally ►vifh variatsons in
8tizseio, rns ,ppaYene ceset eaet.9 eL.1-L tnpageaPhY, thus ~rxsunting for sn apprordmafe range. Additionall ihe
Eour. eh. na€ perke fn ehe rielniey. ]I
ap ~a sptcLFp uhethcr ~nsY are a~re.~w 68 depth to fhe aquifer (water level) ovea ¢ gven point will`vary relative to
mvisturc conditions (for example a drvught wnli aft'ect its leve!).
Plewe sm page 57, 3rd paragraph, 2nd tine.
Change to rcad . . . "and congcstian oscuss . .
c~ P'laase ~fer tra ps~ 88, sectszsn b. Fim hydrants will ~ prmiided in
o ar.cardancg with apphc.ab1e Fire 17epartment czitesoa.
~
c~ `~'he parks in the site vicinity snslude Sullivan Park (lU acres), Central
tir Valley Lians Club Area (twv acres), AFl$ M1Tdbe$ll P,t[If (CiVE aC[CS}.
Mr 97~wnam Moshar , , •
Aprdl 33, 1970
Pagn 3
pago 11, 2nd paragraph, ]asc if na flhe pro]ect pro6aLly shaald cwc pradaco Tlie sgecitic means nf treatment hare nvt been deterrnined at this time. A
nny ramarkahla odars, but carcainiy wny I~g ~g L~rjcugglOTi oF plfcmatives is iilClUtje(~ lIl ~[0 TCg,~pRSC t0 the evmment tetter
dn sn rlr.n !ie eewage r.reatmsnc and 2hat
ahould he :o at.«a. from the Spukane County Health L7fstrict. lnterim or package treatment piants
Pa8$ 12, S[h ppregrapM te ghwld pa knoua vich cortaincp rhntpsr d¢ CIe3tC Offi.T{S1yG fldI][S lr 1RIprOpedy dCSIg[1Cd! COTIStr11C(Cd BIId/OP IrialR-
revlaion o[ propaaed eu6etacian 1veaFlun ~~e(L
u1[hin [he SmmeEiaee ylcinicy Qf [hv eica
ta nesnasary.
Pegs 13, [op at psge wo quee[Ion the amunt af oevegu gen.rei5ou If 1$ lugtily prabable that this substation wOUId be requiaed. If so the
zac4matsd. Pe nlao a.k inr eonxSvtmcy in deVelopeI WtJfild either b6 f I13fEd tp a for ~le CpilStFIICtlU11 t~1C SI'iFiI~
ur~`ySlna~ au4 cv61c Froac far eane oF
c- ~ $ttryYiUt3Ule t4 YIIS i158gC} pi canstruct tt on site as a part of itis prnj t.
. Psge 20 7ei1a uhale page, lFtdecd the Ninls lmpact
atat~"l;. `h° "°rdg my °'d mi--"` Ta be in ccrnFormance witli the estimated water cansumptinn pruvided
eacceely cua oFten vhan may q[ clia auLyvcca
haYe -re c-:.Anty era ra wa.aa na eetter Uy the Vera Water I)istriot (500,000 tv 750A00 cubic Feet per year-3.8 to 5,6
- .b.,a,
rruWan gnllons) thc sewage Ziavc been an this sarne range (W1SiLli 70 ta $0
page 20, 5x1 parngriph TIlSa pnragraph feile co [eks noctce oF cha ~(p1~1]t). F(pWCVCI, further study (compariaan unth actual watcr use by athCr
ecetasolagy avafladle in cl~m una u£ a ffvoluJ
lagaon ta roSd contaminaxsan uS ground woGer. a=a slioppmg ccnters) indtcates that ft usage would be closer ta 18 millian
~ Pbge 13, lei parsgaeyh lWre decp an che si[e liselS, ra=har chan ~gaH4ns annually (2.4 miWon cubic feet). Most aFthis water wifl be (lisprssed og -
~ srstn the thic4seas irs the cenernl pnrc of ~ W1Ste WAtBE, while the remaunder ~vlll '~6c used fnr landsea~ irriga[ion. (1'his
the Va11ey,
°is eqwaalenf ta approximately 100 homes).
Fage 33, lnsc paragrogh 'I'he SCS daco alsa a¢ates chn[ the Carrlmon
dery mtany lo- hsa pncencinl grounduatae ~rj ]~y jp¢st ~gg5 Ptla1}I SI]{~ llll,~lf appl7r tn Future impacts ~i33Cd U~79R -
c Qncara,~fi~, mas chould pe lnclvded, ~a~
L
Pagc 42, lnc paragrnph• 74a assumgcian La r¢a4e thac Smprnved auc4 conditiors wliis}► may or may not riccur ar are anquantiriable. As ehese
ctaiaslon Paccore w111 reeuc~ shn ca san- c:onditions beCCtTiIC f[1oTe ClEFIi]]+' dBf{1@d, a f[1Q,Ie deFiruto atatement C$R be centrasiona fo cRe sice vSclnicy, 1Ia qunsCinn !h3de. It 18 tl'I]E' hOWCVCT, that in same cases ►vill ls more appraprfate,
cnsa naaumi.clua.
Page 43, 3rd peCBgYeph, 1RhO -aumo. the tmpreveversC aP Cho eXiSciag
ea~e sce ~ommenl 1i1o, b9.
a~LeTsAia, rn~ ~ncy 6Y the derclopcrY ue I ~3 Fi
olao queaciw ~ae creal6llstp ne a.eumina
[he pacS'6dicy ot leFt [arn lsr~as on Su111van
cansidarSng LLa prasens congea[lon end 1engch This inP4rma[ian 13 C~ei7V£d IAdliEly fIDIYY peologic lntergratafion it(li~ 3
oP spa~ce aradlaDle beCvern [he Hroadvag-y.11S..avt [nr.eraeecloa aad the 1-90 acceae araaa seismic crosa sectran cvmple teri just east Qf the state line. The aquifer base in
vage 4a, s:n ~~sg~e~ wr,~~ a~e ~~si~ a~~ a,,,,aar,ie ~a ~e.ta~~,ca [he midslle ,F [he aquYfer has nc~t ~n actualiy re~li$d. One well dri~led wesf
, in the e."c CU cqnc4liLCaLIart6 .rz e cnYese af this cross ~cuc+n ~ached a depth oi 300 fecc, hut did not rcach the
to puLltc healrh La the erenC smiosl~ can[ro]
Sevicee ere nnx effecelvz as chc ne~elaper uqiufer's h:ue. Tt~e Hillyurrl trough (wes't QF the site) sh4ws a deplh af 300 feet
~r. ~'~~F't m its seismic section. iVv spcciCc infasm$tion is avmkablc. However, it appears
hat the [7epth o►er the, sitc wauld'be between 300 ta 400 feet and grabahlp
clascz to qpD Feet-
"Garrisrsn ►^ery siony loam has potenfial grmund uater cuntanunation" is
ngr stuted iti 7he Sgnkam Cowty Srd Swu7 (196$). Aiso ptease see the
expanded ►vaier secttan that is incl'uded as an addcndum to the Final ETS.
Piease reFer tv respanse Ha 15. -
~
f r ~ r r a AL i i d1k
i
~ ,
This will he a joint respon::ihil9ty. The deVelaper will be $vked to share in
those impraVements directly attribatable to the shopping center iraflic (access
Hr rn-s rosh- pwnts, tum lanes, additional lane capacity at entry paints, etc.). The
nN, ii i92e
raJ~- s develaper wil! most likety be required to proYide additional right-of-vvay
acljacenf to the site along both Broadway and SuWvaa.
Page 44, lei parayrnph Pluccuacfons ceuse ehuck loadingc [n e gackage
~ ',~'}~j$ P
crcafinenx planc and FivciuaCsMs cen pc exyezied YakflOlTl 1S discus~d zn greater detsi3 on pupea 83 AIIL~ ~ (vOttDI1{
rre„ s shopp;ng ~•un.er aa rr~ a~rei iw„ r.~, 7~ und top of pa~s). This is a signiCennt pra~slem and wtll requzre cxtensive
wa 6e rssured aF ai]erLailon rf odnr prahiema7
iunot doma8c clntwa ara availahle c~ ces[denae in C$p8I151oI1 Of [}1E traffic capacity on Sulhran and rixnntiguration of existing
che evenx th. odar pro6lem fs rsor alLarfniW; y lC[fi tupn C]tSli[1EfiyatlOi1, {1 5¢lUt1QA &a'rl$f3CtS3i]I to the County Engtnccring _
page L&, last paragraph Tl- aigniFYeant shangce in Che r.nalF -bar.Geer- Dej13tt,i110,i1t ►Vjff b6 S COI1d1tiOR of pgpZCCt 8ppI4yaI,
iaCCCS appCaC to Lc ronealfdating larga uoluaesa
in smnll araaa uith . h. pnas,lDla resu7c uE
lnJee[1an Sa[o groond vacer and [hia shauld 6c `j'hiD Fpderal Clean Air Act uiaCS that ar[ihient air cQn[fipnns for C[} ~
sinted clourly, ~ ~
met by ]u!y 19$3, E'anre to do sa could result in additional federally
Poge 45, iot guragreph Thc runoFS vfil 6e dlspoa;d of an etee 6y nne _
re marss acsording ro Lhe evxr, sRiut are (j~y 1Ti~7fldF1tC{I '~.TH1iSp6[LS'hLl1t CD]ltip]S fQL the area and that Ci{12e113 Wflilli~ ~TCe
thu~ ~snc7 Ase r,relle in ths area used in ~3~} le~ ~~pn agi[inSt ths 8tate arld 1~aR1 ►rern[iteqt uuthorifies
•~xaa~~ gmay3 ia xeeting he[ng aane of -r ti~eI, gn , if ~pr~ipriate
i^ 4re6? 1I18A311[eg EU COSIIply WILh rhe St.7ttd3IdS Afe Rat t7F[Ef1.
Page 45, 2nd paragra,pn Vhac arn sami-peryi,ous psvFng sorfacea7 Alau*
- !F [he projece La apprnred aspl If inioruacfan
traw the H268" study sAovo tdar. mur5 stringene g The sysfem design aied sp0Clf1CSY1D11 Wlll W Lpproved by DSj']S, j}(]E $IId
guide;[nss shanid havn hcen lapnaed, do sK havc the Gounty Heaith Districi. The plant wiA be operated Uy a quaiiFiad ared
nsaur~nce chac Khaee mdiFLcalEnns vill Lr made
(C 85 'li~~d Q~~tor. m~m~ Of~Gr }7I0~.1]eIIIS ~(}101i,1 potential
ased av thc ~eck 6epur [ recoiouenJa[i-a [or
j~ !n[e!]igenE smA.ficacloa). Illal(If[]CLIQRS C3I1 GAL1se Bd4Ti F1FIT}71$117$,
~
Page 45, 3rd paragraph. 7here fa no data to varify t1st expeccaxlnri xAnt
an-$ice dSslwan[ and su6zur£.ce recharge rlll noc f]~agC gC~ t(;~R1lS£& t0 ttlC lCttEI f(UIII ttie t,.'1t]1 Af Sj10~C~7110 11I1(~E(
eauee sny unavoLdahls advaxse L
~.~cta, e~
Page 46, [ap aP pagn; Cnnsla[ercy of Eeprh of aquLfer wae apakea to gotentiai liah3liity.
6efore fn eanyvnctluu vieh gage 9, •
rs8e 49. Charc: prcllmioary daaa Egom "20e" and [rm Vcra raporca Plme 45. ~~t P~~Ph. [t is possible Thut ihis storm vsrater wiit
slu~id be sncluded, S) reach ihe ground water. This will be relaterl to annuai ground WAteP and
Pege 52, 2nd paragraph IF Broadray [a apeasd khxuugh [a Harker ue ic preppitation condttions.
mcniluned ln [he E15, tAe 6% fncreaae ls pro6n6ip
uall Lclov accueece rsclaece,. •
Please xe page 45, sechon e. Trifrnmatiun is available vn area welJs. T'his
woge 52. Srd paragraplt qofae snould be eanaidcrod Fur Canklinaand Plorw
aTMl Hro$dv$p eaet oE Cank l3 n as uell a Lq IIECluL~C[~ lIl '~HC 1~yy~I SeCt1QR lflCllt(YBLI' ,'~S &Il ap~3CtLd1$ to '~IigSC 1"CgppflyeS.
,Q
[1g~.red dere h,r- se cnEar sxreeca ara sth~nae ni7ere4 +I~ • See pppendix H. °
in che [reEE[c eecc[on,
eagn 55 Ve queatino chn 1SLnre1 uge of che vurda ehnu]E `m i_~leryj¢RS paving 5i1Tf80ES arC thOSe t~{at aLI4►p ~1aI118] SCCIIa$e p[
and can s~n thie page Ye Feal a[ranper verha
.eea to aa .e. a, surYace water rather than tntally stopping sueh actian.
V.S. 56, c same c~~ as Lor page 55.
p The infatmatinn fsom the "20$" study saRd suhsequent guidelines wifl
p~ prabably ~ developed befc~re constructtpn on the praject begins. Thus ttis~
gutdelines wLll be used by the apprnprlate agencies (DQE, 1]SHS nnd the
County EYeaith Disirict) arriving at iheis appravals and/ar recommendatians.
[]nce the praject is construcied, unless there are spectGc sections related to
existing structures, and guide6ncs are devetuped it is ds+uhtful that these
snadifications wfluld be made unlesa they are readiiy avaable.
86 Please :efer to Appencux H.
~ ~,enUS
AP~c1 li, 1 9 _'a $7 Plcase refer tn camment IVo. 64,
Pege 4
Piease refer to Appendix H.
Y=ge 61, Yst [ull }rnragraph 7'hc Lest ]fne sha++ld elav inslude [lic lnfnr- -
r.hat ttlase reslJens~.esdere thare lnng g~ `I'his esi~mate was madc ~assuming the existing conflgurahun of $roadway.
macLon r.he ahoppLng cen[ers sM hrd 1 itele or 89
If $raadway were 1mpmved through tp aarker, the VQI{1rt105 W013I[i bC $1'C1(C1'
cans ]e ta [o fipln v}iere tn the arca ❑f
«eV~~.=~a.L tn~T~ fa .1g«•ac s.a i Qr ~ua„c than tEvs. Please reker ia thc'1'raFtic 5tudy which has been included.
Ser,d and thn preeaurus for samtrhing ocber [Urn
" uble rc¢9dcnCial ne1gh6urhon4 ufli ka aa dtgeerent they reolly cannoc he (airiy euoqsased Tie naisc readings summartxed on page 50 (along l3rvadway) were takcn
vage 64, a egaLn, the Use of the vnrd may enes iwt realiy YY at [he 1ntorseetion of 13rqadway and Canklin and at the southeast cv rner(east
refitcx the [stae aituatfnn 77sc pragoeal Aaa Q~ af Cn~n) of the site. The main concern during t'his manitaring was ta assess •
nlroady prorided a s[im.~lus [vr chan nd land V
~
„cs ~,d d~elapm~ncql paccerna. ft10 nsrise cnvironment of the site and Qf thUSC adjacent prnperties WhICh _
rase 77, r,., 2ru3 paray,Taph e new atR4 ,nouln be sn,iueza sn rhe isat af ~ would 6e affected by noise generated Fromfln-site.'I'raf8c noiscs generated by
reese Fa.. « ar =he ipa ;randaf the progcee
cc od traftc on public highways (pmvnded tt~at the ►~ehicles meet ttis mntor ►ei►icle
on trnEEic, Suggu
z4e saFety a£ acl,ool ehlldren(5] Sn the D11
[~A~pL rngreaa Af3158 performance standards, Chaptcr 173-62 1VAG') ara exampt from WAC
Ekemerscery a[[endance aree aA vf otf~vr i73~(~046 (m.aximum envirvnmentaI 11~50 leV019),I(ICPe1SCI~ t.IM1f~1C LYl]l,
pedeaxriana and d3ke rldecs."
page 79, lop of prge. L!e ognln qucacfon cRo fcaa16fi5ty af lef[ [~rna iQ~ however, C311$e aII 1Y1C1'f.',7SPy iR OYCii1fl I1.01$e 1$YC]S, but khis increase is in the
slang Sulli..asi w r.unge vF three dhR far each dnubLing of traf5c valume. As mentFaned on
~ page 79, lsc Sall paraKraph, 171c~ congeacinn pntenzial Ie. m.re rhan '~ay Le ~1~'CS 54 and 55, ttiE frequeiicy af nr~ise intrusians is hicety fo he the mest
~ ieaz to 1s~fa ni~irzn„c N aaain, «.axa cn~ ene Qe eha significanf naise pioblem, not the 3nc[e3sC in ovetatl levels,
e e paragrapt st aeacea •'7'hsc sseuselun ,my
ba campounded Ly eha 4,633 additlonal veiilc]es "
ke Feci that ahauld he changed to 'h.llk De I ne (]LIpaSE Uf tt1$ IYlltl$3tilIlg 1IIGa411IC5 SECt141[ (G) 1S tp 5u$g25f I1'10351iiC3
compnuxded". J 1
~ wlitch wyll mitiga#e anticipatcd irnpaats. Thus, the words shveild and can are
Pdgc 80, Chart Iiocivde Figurea far Conkltn and Flara aoeda end
neue anathar FSgpre Ear Broadway if it ie es~cended ~ WOL(L5 OI IBCOt]i{]IEII[~i1E1o11 ~113i~ St[9rigCI ►V4[[I5 SIiCI'i 34 SYIU ►V11I $C pIOY3(ICd 3S
~=keQ. thcse measures are requiterl by the caunty or monxporated into the design by
page $2 Ic appcura the yocentl$4 lncreases on Conklln and ~ the de►elvpcr. These measures wtU be weighed hy both the caunty and the
P3ora heva not heen created vlth as w~ch eigulSicanun
as they chould, capvctally in the ltgt~= chut tl~ere dvvelaper BRL~' lf appropriaEe, LVl]] bC fCBtllIBS incorpoiaicd tnta the '~1138l
Ss a planned nlca acaaea painr oppoaice conxlin projeet design.
Pttgen 75-85 We dld noc Flrid reCerence [o the uu-slta circu-
laiiau roae even chough Hr aluk gava qu lte a Ple= refer to cermment 3Yv. Jl,
61[ nf at~iHeanee eo r.hfa facxor !n relievfng ~
craff3c and nofea ta nclghLQrhood etroate in
_ publLc coa=en[a a[ n recen[ nelghborhund meeslnµ. This was nvt infended as a compa:ison As mentianed on pages 6 2 and 6 3
rose 87, a., u,and Z. rrogrtaa schooi ana the nezeree to sch-I chfidren, there is a sigu5eant amount o1'vacant land in the siie vicinity and #hat there
per[icularly Ln afearnoQn crsffic ne
, eda a greuc
ae$l „~r~ a[[en[ion ana Cph„as6 wil] te strong develQpmentai pressures placed on ttus land bath residentially
and commerciaily. Tius impties tarr►ely and gpsitive aeiion on the part oF the
County Pianning Department, Flannzng Commissian and Hoard nf County
CommissEOners in urder ta establish apprapriate and enforceabie guidetines to
mitigaie adverse impaets. Furthetrnare it impLes avtinn an the part of the
iacal residenis to prvvide input ta these bodies and fa beevme snro]wed in the
planiung pracess as demanstrated by these commenfs.
~ Will is a morc apprapriate ward in this case. This statement is changed to
~Q read "The denelapmcnt of the prapased shapping center urill prvvide a
sitmuius
A&
~
p~ Thig sup,gesttQn is nnied and is included in the Fznal EIS. Aisa please refer
a W Pagc 87, TrafGc Haa.ards, section b.
Mr. 5homas aYuahrr ~
AH:11 1978 Please [efer ta response No. 78.
Pnge $
I'hesa statements shauld 6e changed tv ihus cangestiun potential
q
rase es, a, iost izn~: I: 4e reic ch,c tc should 6g kno~,., ana a.4tea 1pL u.d~ Ue sigitificant . 1..sa nnd "1'his sltuaiiua tul71 be campaunded
herc whexher the exLs[!ng hydrants nrv adcduate ~~J o= np[.
p.$-a 8e-e9, 4.2. u~ ~.e~~„ .a,e~~ cnc rs Na traffic counts are kepl fvr +~onkfin Raari. Tr~c caunts For Flora
au surea w=e ancnined
[aL aay reepoasu [imu ta Che proSect eite a a
h ltoad are: Sout~► pQF Bp68d►j7S1~J 3,12Q]77, 1,342 datly volume; narth af
19-i5 alnuces r aoorser frn~ 9heriff's pacr![ro[om
urtlcs ead re By~d~yaY 5r20''~ -1,llp dnily valume; and narth ofSprague 5/27/77, 1,335
spnnse
ehe Staee pyrrol fortrLmera5 FFi n[cnueea ar laes problems. d.31]]f VDllIR7C.
Fege 90, 4 5, c.• 1Ta oparstar wat be qualifded end ]Sconsnd, 104 -~y.- - s
6y tlie stace t,creY tnm shovld 6s. n It 1S C]tjeC'L£II ~'I18t SIlWV1I1 WlR be Y~lE IT!$JOT tCdfI1C CdTy72[ ti0 tI1Q 51(0 3Rd
Page 91, a 6, a, IficEFk, hntaucc or EeY soae BwTee azacVa.zan, a~ that project Wnerate3 ira!'fic using Flora und especially Cunklin ►would be low.
the aaz ana DSIiS ,noula nisa ~ na~aea xa FeB,ra if1P~ Fxguzc 3 ln the included TrIIFFic SeudY, AgFendix G, shvws prajecteci trAffic
co thelr reaponaibllftiea [a gruund vater, aeuer..
IU
aLr paltuttvA, ece 6 rulea and rag.lacCona. V[llllri'1CS (j1C31C $Ollf) fOI 4I1.B ViClttal SLIOet t1C3WOL2C. TFLB Pe71k hOAI VQIl1Ii1C fOY
p48es 92-97, c.: It appesre anythirEg of thie mxgaieude requfres Conklin is grrsjected ta be 100 Vehicles. `Fhis would amount ta agpraaumately
see. irzr .oamicmnr a [a= Rnergg rcauccsan rarher $00 tu L,f1pU ►ehickes Dri a daily basis.
= chan bhat might ba ur uay bc,
Page 44, -[ap oE pago; Yhs[ is Yess'e cupeeLty navt Row mucH grrn.ch ThC OII-sIte GlI'CWatAilil 5YW111 WO111d C9IfSlSL DC a pei1meIeI i[Fad WiTIISA
is alloved hefare che 28 ~gavacce cnmmftmcnt {
rv ie reechsd3 f~Q the confines af thc site. Y'his raad would carry taaFfic #'ram the majar entrance
c~si r,8e s,, a: (i„ eonJuncclaa vFSd 6,1 b, Me 93) ic pwnts along 5ulliran snd Broalway inta on-site parking iats. As shawn vn
eppeare a 6tnakduYn oi needa in expansloa~ 1 a Fi~,~urc 3 rsf the Txs►ffic 5tndy mosi af the traf~tc ►vould enter or ex5t st pvints
costs, and tiho psya 8s nscdcd,
A, B, and C irom Snlliran ar Broad►vay. I'hese painis wili direct most vT the
page 95, 6,3, Sma[ !a the holding cspacltyt f[hui do pr€ssvrc ~
~ee~s an~ ~~e ~e ~«~apeteaa s+txi traf8c away fsam adjaccnt reslderrtial ~uses. Aiso busincsses such as restaurants
r~ae.~.o:sa be neeaear ,ma ,iii paya and ttreatexs shoWd be plaaed so that the txaf~c tliey gcnerate will enter fram
Vago 95, 6,4; Ve vuu1d regea[ the cwaeen[s aa9 questlnna fraen ~ SLIIIVdR. FAIFIIBITI161C the Rri-sitC cI19C11t8L1Of1 S}I8IE1i1 W1U bC SC[EeRCd Fi6ltl the
, psges 44s 45. and 46. In addltSyn. ve aak dor
the f[gure o[ ~~dential uses by earth ~ms and landscaping,
5,~ ~ 6,~ gallona u i aevagn
par day uam arrivs9 a4, lllll laundro-mate La
consiaered aa tenaatef V1lk [he araSnfleld
hav~ ~~s~ ~er i=t aa~~ =~a~a hcen aa~er The pvten[ial hazaxds related to Progress 5ehnol and pedestrian traffic
zr a~e, ,~n, ~e4 ~e t. cne .esetG vara~ i" aI have been intad out and miti tin measures have heen recornmended.
xR iw,z ,xitsr vnae ie .ne a~y~n or cne ~L1 P¢
on cnf sicef TraFfic will inciease ulong Broredw¢y nnd Sudlivan. Mnm pedcstrian and bicycle
pagr 97. G, 7n4 P.raKagh; A packaga eregtmeot pi.nc naurd aiso ae t,scneica trafflC will be attracted ta the project s'lts and they wili be crassing Yhese
by ocantxacCnr viCh x permft. All plans snd ad
11 efia]gthpg $cc]dent o~nt11ll WlU 135~. ~115 L&~l ~ TT11ti tEd t3]~ ClC$I 7Il[~
npecificseLffne fas ~r prvpuaed planC chould 60 ~ 11 ,
p ~
approvze ad wi i ne sevlerred by b5135, noe, epn, adequaW signage, traffic s'eparation arid Wed contzaLs. 5i[ie►valks, crass►valks,
Cnunry Engineer, ana Spukane Fkalth uistriet,
and signaLtxaii4n wlU assist in providing traffic sepuxutian. On-site pedestrian
, walkways wrill m.duae accident patenlha1 on site.
10~ Pkease see page 88, seetian b. The nutpbes aF'hydrants amd wator capacity
will be expanded as necessary ta meet the requsrements af the local fire
protection ctisfric#. At ,present those exisfiing are not adequatc to serve the
patcatial requizements far the proaect.
'fhese resgnnse times were ehtainad frnm of[icezs ❑f the respecti►re
organizations and are avcrage respnnse times.
1oA The °perator must be quaiiGed and be Gcensed by t}ie 5ts►te Dapariment ,
`k aF Ecolo,gy.
Mr. 'fivmas ?soaher Rvr11 il, , g1a 1'lia EPA would nor be invalved unIess federal Funcltng was invalved.
Page S DpE, d75H5 and thc County Heallh Distnc[ are tnvalved to varying dcgrees
with the review ancl appraval aC se►vuge dispdsal systems. Tha wuanee of
Yage 97, d, C6nenminsnta gercola[ed .nxo r.he graundwaeer a.iSC}IRT~'@ 11CrItI1tE ~]Y 'aQE f(7[ SOIl dISC~IlfIbC5 has nvt been reavlved ~3t t~li5
.an be evosa~a ny a sealod lagoun tima, [75H5 is respvnsible Tor appraval vT waier systems plans along wnth tue
Psge 98, L, unas la tha lmpecr aF the proyecc oa xlte xcea appmpnate water disfrict.
Pispusal SiCe7 FWw aaan vill La filled I
end hov iwch taacer d[[h cueh a prajsc[Y
'rhe developer wiil ui11ize teehnntogy and design to reduce encrgy
Vary trulY evngWmptiAn ta the geatest extent pracrical.
i Appraximately 14 mogaw+atts nf average power u prescnYly eommitked
r~ ~ Aaareas 1~~ by Vera which would essentiaRy mean anpther 14 megawatts is available to
.~~r~_ supplY growth. This of course u dependent on Future Banneviqe Power
_oy Admuustration pvbcies and un the uverall energy situation For tiie Northwest.
r--;
l .l. v~,, i= ti=, d__ ti. Tlie sui;statinn would be grovided eithet by tlie develoger aa a part Qf the .
~n,..:r, ~r.. _ e' [i~ sTc+ AV*rryli..•,a~ f
development vr by Vera Power at the develapars expcnse (far anly ihat
Oll psution atfnhutcd to the developmant Ff built at a lasger eagacifiy than
rcquired by the prnyect in ordez tn scrvc Qttier areas not relsted to the •
L _ /i PS~~c 3 ~ ~ project).
J", I1~~.~GA~ ~r7 .'22,.s.. 1'lease sec guge 48, 3.9 a. 7he pressure and capaciCy af !he exishng line
~a"``~~, ~ a . 109 are inadequate fa serve the prnject. The water demands af the project ara nat
antirapated to require a new reservoir. The dcveloper wiH pay for any
expansjon m C3pACity orer and abpre thst cumcnily included in the ►unter
MEin ~ AP di•
la~s.
~~4~.Ct'.\.3~ $Ln~it,S~]■
~.Ny~, Please sce cumrnent No. 71.
~ f~~ 114 'I`iie tenants have nat been determined at thYS iime, Uu[ it is possible that
ey a Faundro-mat will be a tenan t.
Ato, soii conditions do not appear ta pravide any constramts to
percolation as e►ndenced 4y surrannding sepGe tank uses and the Red Lion
dramfield. Final aPproval ❑f sewabe sYstems bY lhe CountY Health I3istttct
r ~j.f_.d~..: would conseder thi
j ~ ~ _ .~i rf . ~~~n 3 4 B flC......" "
~ ~ PEease see Appcndix H nf this document.
4~ The depth to il►e aquifer is estimated to rangc fram 60 to 80 fee t and the
depth to bedrack is estimated ta be 300 to 400 Feet.
A packagc tre$ttncnt plant ar any disposal system ►viA 6e installed hy a
con[ractor with x permit. All plans and specifications will be approred hy
DSHS, DOE, wiih the County [-Iealth District tssuing permits. The County
_ Engineeas becamc involved zf ehe systern will be tumed vver to them fvr
vpcration. If such a possipility does exist at same future daie the ptans and
specificatLons must also meet their approvai.
AL r ~ Ak Ask ~ r 'Ma a ` i.
- . r
@ 'Fhere is not suF&cient space on site for this type of system.
1
iTnsaivagahle s+olid vaste gonerated by (he prvjeel wiil utiliae the Mir.a
,rAiT~ CA P'I`I-IX II~aNAGEMEN'' CCDFiI'O1~.ATIDN
r chsposal site. `The site is projected to l:~t enather ltl to 15 yexrs based on
co~Mene~,ai rravea.v uaH.eerer~r [1y'(1]eCtCd giOWt]1 IBteS. Additianal space adjasent to the existirag site is 6eing
anon. c~) 489_4332 .2eT nonntown otfis. aaI; • apoh.n. w..Rinoeon Sg2fy, cansidered. "I'he pmposed pr6ject will hare relatinly littie impact on the life
of the Mica site.
Apr11 24, 197tl ,
County of Spotane
Nnrih 8$1 .IefFce9on ,
Spnkene, 4A 99201
Ai[en[3np gprkonc Councp p]anning PepartmenC
Cent]emcn
ln respontie co che "ornf[ Fasrironmcnral lmpnct 5latesent" of rhe proposed
°VUllcy Nnll° daced rebrnary 1978, [ am vricfng uc the requeat of oy ell~nc "
Unlrareiry C1[y, ]nc , oF vhlcl. xcCIIr[4y qanaganea[ Carp~e~rluo ia chv ~n-
agtng &geRt, ~
rw= a~~eraI pors'raon vicn regsrd tn the projecC fa eene sl=hough lt ia ,.ei)
lncered fnr che fature, c'fusr. chc c~cepc te yrems[ure, ~+euea 04r musor 114 Tt is the develapers opinian that the prvpnsal is a feasj'~le proje~Y, ~1$C[~
_ omplaine lnvalvee upua wu 6ulsuvn r.o 6c a grose errur 1n [lw ee[imoced aokee
requlrrd ta maxe chu pru,~ucr. econnmicnily fesetAle t'~sccchy reauicing I. e upan the exgcrience af oiher reginnat shogping oenters nr~ iliecoast, ~`CS-T8C
tbcaiiY r.ibQ ustcmate or cnr i@peet or ttu, ten«Y. Mal1 in Federal 1Vay and Vancauver MaIZ, i[hc dcvelaper Feels ihai the msuket
~ OnPase 28,1 In, IeRolr, ene wrL.cr ciasms «t ~ u~e $an,na ~r s$„are potential in the zeynn will be supparti►~e of the praject and that sales ~volumes
~ Foac at anlee Fo r tl~r drpacauenc etnres and satLan[cd $55,W6,600 W per
yerr Nhen Puiiy nper-;-»wl nf the uncir~• 760,006 squsra feee oY retnll spnco Wlu bC SI1ffEC1CI1t tO WaIIaTttt f]1C ngpBss3I]+ reY1t3 tp amvrliae r}iC CIIpiW -
Far an erersg.,• yerfurmance of $72, ]7 per aquare fnat. 1i1V85iR1G'11t3, meet vperating expcn,ses and providc aR $deqi1a1te retUrR GR
on pnge 29, che vrtcur aC I'- Imp$ct Stntement indleexea chnr che eosc af iL1VC$tmCRt.
chc etaucturc utll he nhsut $50 00 per agyara foa[ Fas the "cn~itial ennacrur-
ttr.a rnae" AasssminK iai,a ~alv~ss a~ ~~d~sx $ l W n~r aqUare fmt, Chla TTAFf7C gCRBi&'~lpll lS ~75£d (}R fl~r 3I@fi n0t Sa]C3 VpIk111105,'['hc rate nf 35
xouia res~.is ]n un av.rall groas inveecment oF uLaut $57 3] per aqunre fonc ~end& ,~C~ 1.00(} [eEf pj' giSl@fl3~IC flppi ,3TER ►V75 113@(~ '~p C4![i
rCivr cuking lnr.o nr..n..nr ]an3 r..qulrcm~.ncn Yor parksng end lendarnping. T'~ pUtC
huzv,.,I"g e-tnrr rn„1 i "r: .i-•1o-r un" ia t- ~ to sRt ad" s x tax ysridnuL arerage d.3ily kraffic r~alumes. Thls is the mte used 6y the 5pokane Re~anal
nn the r». Sra Inrestmersc ac prrsKnt day lnenrnei ratus, rhFch afcce $ddinq Pta7IlI11I1g t..'fltlfClCtlpO , Transpnrtativn Stlid]7 F1kV151Qf1 ln j1ICpSTj.fl$ YI8fF1C
ab-uc' $.6a par syuaru i~wi ior rznl cetatc taxea (ehe ueudy clnimed onc ros1- ~11Crd't1a13 ~S~IFtIRt~S ~O[ (tl~ prpppSCL~ j1I~f0G~.
llun .lallaru in r.ns r or aGnus 63 20 per equure €ouc) , $ na for inaur-
auCe, 5.10 for mnln[enance nn[ H.ase~sn6lu m tFe [enante. arsd $ 25 for '
nnqement, nn. ~...nld have co e act a reni oi n6uur. $fi 42 per equare Foor
on [!'c averygY j~l 4~.u enllii• ~en[ea,
Averngc pircn01_1Egc runcu In S,pntcane vn"pd 1nSicatc tfwr 748 af vulume voutA
6c o gond pcrFnrmnn.~ Fos enn[emplal ~"Vall~y MsSI". N4CLllicnm Shapping
Lc+n[i•i, toc in3[~ncv. QoLL yvui yleld~^3 [rn[a of R~1GP9L E%Ri'[lY 3% aF Lo[a]
nslee The reivireJ gre~xs a¢5ex [hen Sn pny a renC aE Sfi 42 [$d 42 -.03$1
auu'a 6e 5185 6,3 pcr aquarrs fnnc, no~ $72 ]7
_ ~
. ,
k'.ige 2
S«U~..1»e L-nLy PZaiknTl]g 11t[s.~Yimin[
npril 24, 1978
~i~Jlcute t~~~~ I am nn1 ae[i~alnR Jaoxn 81scr oF no[ kpuWing thu
I hyyi", 11
Eaz[x aB~p~ chi r¢nl esrare lo.iyinGi3 ] a nure ha ln aell a e r5f [liu
p, rfnrm.tn'c rhn[ lhnn ca 6e reallzed co L.reac~ [hn salssx n cnsary co pay
en[a ~hn[ vou13 u raye in [h, $fi 42 rursge R le qufteF R~r
pen[ [i~sx
h~N tRVlro~~~u~ia1 lmpuc[ S~a[Cm,31[ u[I[ce Cl[hcY dnca nu[ a ~Sbh tn a~ggluec
ih~ Impacr. of rh, cenr~r, 3oes nor unaerstand che arlkhw4ilc of ~he p.al-
, ~ndjar 19 Y~adlns refer;~~~,~- YCroY[a [}Wf L'i•pfuesn[ the ~5as[ 1jIf~ l
She~pr.rx.nl ~n tnr ¢n rnq,yCY-tfoa ros[e und wlumes requlred fpY rLn[sn[~ are
r,ontcrned
Ih" esIlmaLl• uf eni~u vulumc app11r1 tn lok uhnnt 39S of uhat 1,t11lly -ulY
hsv. lu he AI[nlncd [m m~ke rhp invrslmanL Faoni6le le[ slonr. [~uly a[Crac- -
~ L9~e s$246,00(9,UnU 06 aqjiu~; aal~s noC $55,0INl.O00 110 ae 1polC3[ed lil
thc e.•~u~r~
I meu[ W~~ al NorSiitnwn a6ove i w oylJ rnl l yuuY ¢uen[ lan m[hn f&,c LtiaL
uh~'n 1lorehinvn u~i3 6u111 Sn 1Y62,~[hr [uLal liiVea[men[ r me[hing l¢ge
than $12 Op ~.er bquare Ioot ur.~rall iar gronv leuxeable area nhvirwoly
an=[clpaS..d r,nca -A s pcr equa- lnar. 1n 0 $12.d6 per sq,.ee Fnne cen- ~
l~Y cauld he ~~h lLxa thnn Sn g rruLeY ~o9Cing aL'ound $53 W per equa~c
fnn~!
Mp paini s4eo lu cW.c [.hn.EnvSranrgacri Fnpnee Ssae-r, all dk8 pagrs ot -
i[, 1s 6ae~d ..p„~~ ~ cept r,t lmpnrt ShnC daes nac 1-1 uith thr Fartn
Lh-1= muaL 6e an1f~•i~>>[4~I fn 197$ and heyo~,
(v SS~~sr [he a rag, u~~I, le o£ eacL .us~owr (And [h[ieFa[e [he nua6er oF
B1 ~ cifNa dmolv~l] ~g~lns[ +,h~1eh [hc [rafflc fupec[e nnd ~hiCh Sl] n[hcr
~ Imp~cls a rp1CYl~icid wlll no[ 6e murh R~r~ 5F on ln [hn "Vall¢y Mpll"
Ctlnn I[ Sx~u[ Hnr4l~inw~, l[ !s. qufle ohvloua ,LhAC Irf,[he ro:.ll 1~ to produce
[hc 9~scz,nna,nnn no ~f u~lOue ~ir•~~63aCy Lu ~[u.~[v a pCO£1t. 3[ muaS d~aw Yuughly 25 GJMGy - urh IrpfFlc u~3 lndF,neud 1, [he e[udy. Cotncld¢RlRlly
1l uv~~id alao hnv.c~ pr~-duce ahaut ty s [he 1978 rulume uf Nnrr.hcornl
Alxu, IF 1[ mue[ Arnu tY~1y ~ii1;i [o s rvl~e, f[ .ould k~suk [e dCdw L[ua a
vas[iy wldcr sr~.H t lum IaJ-ced, -s ehcr~Faru, lupacc such ar, Cn c -
rrnel~na 6paKe 62), i„~idi• Iwel fpugc 52, 57 oM 54)1 snd craffic I Page~en
74-84] unu;d havu iv 6e r~c;illy recnirularid ln accordnnce u1cl1 rhe enrta
Th4 r4irv[Y" o[ [hia wun~.~ hc [ha[ 11 the Cence[' Ceslly d1d only develop
uud $72 77 per vqu..rp fuul plue lnflatipn to th2 du[e aF opcning, cer-
talnly t h e knvr3lmLnl would he Y ia[uC[[ophe, and [hcreCore, o ero, d
e[he mriln[Gn~nrv of the prnJ.r.t nnd other undlscloeed eiemen[a oF
eha r.i]culuced impirrc W~~nld 6u au6}ece 0.o auyar qu, atla
eetlmaLea nf poC~n[1n1 8[a63l1aed ~olumc oC
$1G1,a0n,~1W ~70 Sn 177tJ du]jAr9 !9 required for Che BuGr~_vsFu~ p~~rp[ft~n
of kllfl Cc'R[CP, urtd n ~mfng 2I3 .+E xhin uolume wuid de se11cA "slwpper'n
ganda", [hz pnrr,,c 1.]a{- ahopper'y go~" ln [hla a cen[er vuuld hnve
co Le a"«nd 594,000,000 611 m Mike it c nomic 7histe a "ehopper'a
guuds" vulume u~an 1r~ pru:.rnrly neing enjnyed Sn rhn core n :h~
^cne.ru] ~ualne=_a •!i4~rL^c uf Spotere and 1FnAveralcp Ciev -Uln..dl
r
i
i i Aft Ank r Alk r ML AL ~ t
$W4kAn~ Cuun[y 1`1411OWU 11tpuC[men[
98/24178
f[ is appns-c 111i,11 chai SF Lhe AgCRCICM af [hu o a are guing m roly nn _
[hv QSnvlroipyen[ol impucG 5t46Cla:nC ee b creSlh{e eati-te oi lmpaCt, [han -
c~realnly [hly y<<dy muur 6n r.xirk24 fa prnduCe a qore ruullutlc vs[[mte
uC rka[ [hu nr[uul lmpgt4 nF [hle een[ar r4lE 6b
very r.ruly yuyra,
fIC i'JIATHY MAtiACEMEN% CURY9tUT[JAi
Earl a K.C«hy. CSM - CCIx
Clwirtaan OP rna &ued
r.unldgd , .
cc 13urry Xagnuean -
Tcrry C]¢gg
5umnle a 7uny Fiean
Dure P.t.YSOn
N
S71
L0
710 Sbelwad8uDp T_ 498-O3B0 Spup,q.{YbfA4p1m 89201
Spcph, l1rgbNidd bC. .
Rryr31 h, 3973
1'lnrin]N: Ccrmisslm
County of `0019IF18
sp41c11ls C.CUnty COUrLfsAiee
."eeinr, Nasftilr5(;ECn
11Cn1' 311'9
Z tnvc Iu= I'cca-lvr,d " Y]tv3rnrn7n[-il YWnet ".tatmxs~t !'ur the €5rqija'ed
supf•r M,Ic.,al sroppi.u~ cencer, "vaizey ,laaa^. rasirr uari issclig mv 11G yiG Aithough the propased ,praject Evill stimuiate residential gruwth in the
,rY•mcnis rerWn3l.u; um aetusi3 or t2w pxxr~wcff devrloromoe., usv tpnnclana I I~i
4ea1 ~ rrkth the totnl 1i~patt ey~Mn M;10rk71 oievclr.rrw+nt. CLt` aeCol] 1 J immerliate vicinify cst' the site t[ is unfikely thai it wilk be the primary grrswth
N mrics4 F7'nNS qcel[e slaaly, tuxi 4his emta' m1i1 rrente very 71tt1e Sn the lIN$41CCI ln tl0 V5ll0Y• ThC ValleY 15 eurnenfly undePgoing stgIlftcant gIi]►yZf{
!.I 4ay oe new R:3je$, rh,t rr,rrmr wsii be aicti,g, ama trR ec~le nmacn ar
ezSsc3ry ccxmftrclal ~asj b4Ch IarY•e Fuxl mnn11. 111s Ss espnln'ily L'nic and fhis trcnd is expected to cantinue regnrdless oC whether the project 15
or Em~~ersicy escv ic wsii :,iso ss.fmias.e t`Fpkl rr~th res~r+nCl:llly in
aren rR~ere that wwl~l Ae Pron;~ture arcl whc~ m[uqr vf tlec h11C faC111t1es
c{rs c4mpi~tad ar not. Please see the ~ncluded ~vnamic siudy in Appendlx F.
[mn9t nota6ly SCMer] nre nQL nperyugte. 7Tpe CenYer eraiul Srs3n rruva4wea
aIL1Y2uril the Yvk; rlAnnlrg; luxl Canstn1Ct14n (er1cx3 inc3lrnLe1 in the pc;5r
1q85, nav nemilCe that ail7ert[nt saerd72C. 1C also neece tMt fE ~i1d 6e
xIS?r fOr spcAcarw C2.u`Ly Fwk the mtropolltail 9fe~a to en]arFt nral a1i13nce
exSatlW, shoppPru; arens sAU~er pOaaFblc, rutPrr thvi dsiln Cntnll,v
ncw or188 fit nEw 7OSC'lCldZrs.
Y have na R>eclClc obJecLluse [o the n,{yallty a!' Llr ile;rclrxrrvnt Its0f,
but Vgtler, cam[aT7s rwer the t3pprqvlntane35 OP LhSs dewelr4ro.Inl ns ii
relqS,e;7 Lp thc hnAC lnkr_re,y[^ qi' the tyciym fsm of the 9nolcuvr c~SCy,
d hnllffvr this CenCer ~ld Cqster ]nef'I`lClrnt epraw] rehSCP7 ln not ln the
Fxs:, ryublic vr privaLp Sntercat of the crrnusltv.
SLsCL'Cly,
QaVid 11. I'eterscp
_ A AGIICi'1[' UL[`E`CLW
r*m mc
,
a a ~ a + ~ a a r AEL
a
ADDENDUM
FINRL EIS
AaDITIONAL CDMMENTS FRQM THE LEAD AGENCY
The foZ1Qwing sectian contains additiona1 comments from the Lead
Agency regarding the Draft Envirflnmental Impact Statement. 7he eamnents
are included aiong with the additions andlor changes suggested by the
Lead Agency. The pages af originaa text have been included with the
additipns andlor changed underlined. •
271
r
this document is based on the total project and is designed to shaw tne
maximum impacts af the develaprnent.
The site 4f the proposed project is iacated within Spokane County ~
and consequently falis under the jurisdict7an of the Caunty for compre-
hensive planning and zoning controls. The site is currently vacant and
zaned Agricultura7 wtth a pianned Zand use c]assification of Residentia7.
Adjacent uses include Freeway Comme rciai, Agricultura3, and Residential.
C(]n51 dErTrig tF12 location af this si te i n relatian to other corrmercial ~
acti vi ties and the prvximi ty ta a Propased major commercial center on the
5pokane County Comprehensive Plan Map (lvcated at 5prague and SulZivan),
it wouid nat appear that this use of the site wou7d he unreasona4le. In
additicn, this site is consistent with the Zocationa3 performance stan-
dards a5 set farth in the text of the 1951 Cvmprehensive Plan.1
Tv the extent that County ieqaT counsel fee7s the propased major com- i
mercia] center an the Comprehensive Plan map at the Spraque and 5u]livan
is not close enouqh ta the provQSed site to be interpreted as sUAFartive
vf th i s prOpo5d 1, a formaT resoT uti on Chariqi nq the Comprehens ive Pl an
map location of that major cvmmercial center maY be necessarY. The Com-
prehensi ve P1 an maA 3 wher+ drafted i n 1968, dpRai^eC1tl.y d1 d nat anti ci pate ~
a location af any ather reqivna7 centers Tn the 5pakane Va1Tey than existed
at the time. If the propu5a7 addressed in this document is apqroved, f'he
resultinq effect ma.y amaunt to a transfer of a prvDvsed majar commercaaT
center desiqnation from the existinq location vn the mao tv this location at
Broadway and 5uilivan Roads.
1
1
1
!
1
1
5 ~
272
ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAGTS WHICH MAY BE MITIGATEa
Potential adverse impacts on'Tandfarins and soits may be mitigated by
adequate site planning, landscaping and architectural detail.
Impacts on air quaiity may be mitigated by impraving the 5u7livan
Road corridur s❑ that traffic is ab7e tv mave quickly and efficiently either
to the°site or beyvnd the site ta other destinatians. Broadway shouid aTso
he improved, with possibTy a Tink ta Barker Road and its interchange with
1-90. The shopping center deveiapment might be phased so that the impact
of the Federai automabiie emission standard5 wouid ba3ance out the increase
in traffic voTumes in the site vicinity. These measures shau]d reduee the
anticipated increase in carbon manoxzde levels resulting from traffic gen-
erated by the operational project.
Assumiraq that a decline in air quality may be matiqatea bv impravin~
tihe rpad s.ystem i r~ the v# ci ni tyo of the prflject, it can be arqued that the
devel aper of the proposal shouid bear a qorti an of the fi rranciai respan-
sibility far these imqrovements. The praject w5la be the direct cause of
additional traffic generated and consequentT.v cause the conqestion result7nq
in air pvilutzon. On the Qther hand, if this fs deemed ta be a praposal
of mEri t to the comnuni ty i t may be equal l.y arqued that the comnuni t.y at
larqe should bear the cn5t of improvinq the rvads in this area.
7he changes ira runoff characteristics resu1ting from the impervious
surfaces may be mitigated by the construction of a dryweTl system. Any recom-
mendata orw5 andsar pa7 i cies reached by the Cvunty Water QuaZ ity Management 11208"
study that relate to the prpblem of waste water dispvsal 5hculd 6e c❑nsidered
in any evaTuation of impacts ar rrieasures tv mitigate adverse impacts. •
NaTSe impacts can he mitigated samewhat by fallowing accepted procedures
for noise aGatement during the construction phase. During the operationa7
phase, na3 se generated by increased traffi c YDl111F1@5 can be mi tigated by
p3acerrerrt of aCCesS pvints and careful planning of 4f1-51te traffic circula-
ti on . In addi tion, buffgring, in the fflrrn of ea rth herms and landscapi ng ,
can be prvvided ta deerease the naise intrusion dir•ected toward sensitive
nai se receptors.Light and gl are impacts can also 6e mi ti gated by carefui
placement of Tights on the site and architectura3 and land5cape screeriing.
Early and close coardi nati orr wi th i ocal p1 anning agencies shou7 d mi ti-
gate same of the growth-inducing impacts of the praposed project. Careful
attenti on shoerld be di rected toward tfte transi ti onal areas adj acent t❑ the
site, especially the residential ne%ghhorhoads.
Traffic prghlems can be mitigated by improving the capacities of the
existing arterials in the site vicinity. The provasion of adequate lane
charanelazattion sa that congestion at access points and intersections is
aTleviated is a major faCtvr in the mitigation of traffi~ problems in this
particula r praject. Sullrtvan should 6e expanded ta at lea5t four lanes
between Sprague ancf to apoint north of the I-90 interchange.
Increased energy demands may be.mTtigated-by appl,ying energy cQnserva-
tivn measures in the design of the project rvhi ch might inci ude earth bermang
arad Tandscaping against the exterior walTs, additional insulation materials,
maximizatian of solar efficiency, etc. Alternataae energy svurce5 might
also be cansidered. The same is true of transportation energy cansumption--
alternative modes of Gransportation or patterns ❑f usage may reduce tatal
energy eonsumptian. 17 -
273
~
1
The capital construction!cvst of the prvjeet, based an median values for regional shopping centers, wauld be an estimated $50 per square fovt of gross
leasa6le area. This wauld praduce a total cost of $41.5 million f or the
fu7ly completed praject. These construction costs wauld c4nvert to income
fvr the 5u}3p11er5 of goods, material s, services and 7 ahar. A majority of 4
these suppTzers wouTd be lacated in the loca1 area, and corrsequently, °their
incames wnu7d additaona]Zy cDntribute to the lacal economy.
County revenues generated frvm prvperty taxes wi77 ancrease significantTy
as the propased project becames fully operatiana]. The vacant land presently
generates a tax irrcame of $2,987 per year. This figure is derived by
multiplying the as5essed valuat7vn (true and fair market value) of the
property by the present tax rate for the Central YaTley District of $24.$40
per each $1,000 of assessed valuation. AsSuming that the market vaiue of the
campleted praject would apprQximate that of the construction costs, the
tax revenues generated should amount to apprvximately $1 militan per year. '
Thus, a significant source of rewenues tv the 7oca1 area would be provided
by thc campietion of this praject.
An estzmated 1,700 new jvbs wauld be pravided as a direct result of the
ful ly operatianal project. In 1975 the whvl esal elre'tail trades generated
a total payrnlt of $233,559,000. The tatal empioyment in these trades for i
the same perivd totaied 21,900 ernployees. This would yield an approxi€nate
medium income of $8,360 for these trades. Tlhus, it fal7nws that the tatal
estimated value of the new emp7Qyment in the area wauZd amvunt t❑ $14,233,000.
5ecvndary johs generated by the Tocai spendTng of this r+ew #ncvme, would also
contribute tv the strerrgth of the 3acaZ area economy as we1T as produce
new additiana7 tax reaenues. ~
AZthvuqh Count.y leqa1 counse7 shvuld be cnnsulted, it is qeneralYy
acceqted that Planninq Commis5iori recammendations are not 511pC7(JSed to be
made with regard to contral ❑r maniaulatian of the tree market system or
with any intent to minimiie campetition tv existinq established businesses, -
the questi or~ of over zor~y nq for busi ness and commerci al r~ar,etheless ari ses #
i n~ases such as the ane whi ch i s the 5 ubject of thi s envi ranmentaT impact
statetnent. _
The repflrt prepared 6y Edward M. Schaffni t, Market Artal.ys3 s: 5pokane
Ua1ley Mai TReqiuna] Shoppinq Center, 5qakane CvuntY, Washinqtan, was a mar-
ket s~tudy desi qned primar-~ 7~ to estab3 i sh a r~arket in the e.~es of potential ~
~tenants of the shoppirrq center. As such, it is n4t, and was nvt intended to
he, a dacument that adequately addresses the economic imoact on other #'ac71i-
ties in the surraundinq reqion. Sucfa a review can he Droduced fram the data
cantained in the above referenced rrarket anaZ.ysis, but wou1d require the
expertise of a prafess iorral ly econvmi st to do sa. I f such i n formati on i s
deemed advi sabie, it raa,y be necessary for the Planni n4 Cvmumi ss ian arad/vr the ~
8oard of Gounty Gomnissioners to direct preqaration of such an econamic
imAact review.
~
29
!
274
the majar impacts of this intrusion should be mitigated by carefuZ pTanning
and architectwral treatment.
8. Land Use '
a. Existing Condztfans
Tibe exa sti ng 1 and u5L5 i n the area of the prapased project as sfiown on
page 58 are varied and range from aqricu7tural tv residentiai, to industria3
and Gorrumercial. Interstate• 90 runs a7ang the north baundary of the vacant
site. The T and 6etween the freeway and the 5pnkane River i s presently vacant
and is transited by a rail rvad I i ne. Between tne Spokane River a nd Trent the
land use is maning and industrial with the exception of the cvunty's Suliivan
Park. The ]and uses west of the projec't site consist of freeway comrnercial,
residential (sing7e- and muTtz-fami7y), an elenentary schao1, a church,
agricuTtura7 and vacant Tand. To the 5auth of 8roadwa,y the predominant -
uses are residential (single- and muZti-famaly, mabile hvme courts) and
agricul tural . A7 ong Sprague the u5es are residential, agricultural, com-
mercial, and of#ice. The land uses ta the east of the praject site are
residentiaT {sing7e- and multi-family}, agricuZtural, vacant land, and
churches.
The i and u ses imned iately adjacent to the si te cans# st of the folT awing :
ta the north lies Interstate 90. The narthwest of the corner of the site
barders tne Red l.TOn rlotor Inn and a service statian, with another service
statinn on the west side of 5u11ivan Rvad. The remainder of the land aTong
Su71 ivan, north of 8roadway i s vacant, 6ut i 5 haclced by single- arrd triui ti-
family residences. A fire5tataon occupies the southeast cvrner of Br oadway
and Sul livan. The remairring larfd u5e a7ong Broadway acrass fron the prapased
project site is vacant, residentiai (5ingle-family residences and duplexes)
and agricultural (pasture and hay). Several of the awnerships aivng this
section of Brva.dway are acreage parcels {2 t❑ 5 acres}. A church is located
irrmediately east of tFie prvpased praject site.
The zorring imuned5ate3y adjacent to the site corrsists geraerally of freeway
cammercial (FG), agricuituraT (A), sing7e-fami7y residential (R-T twa
. famiiy f"e51de17t'Idl (R-2), while the site itseTf is zoned agricultural. The
1 and to the narth and east of the s i te is al so zoned agri cultu rai . The 1 and
on w€iich tlte Red Lion Motvr Inn and the adjacent service station are located
is znned Freeway Cvrmmercial. On the west s ide of Su7 ]ivarr between f9i ssion
and Broacfway, the land is zaned Freeway Camomerc7a1. The predominant zane
opposite the 5ite, a7vng 8roadwa,y, zs AgricuTtural with some single-family
and twta-famiZy residential zaning,
The Generalized Camprehensive Plan Nfap of the 5pokane Metrvpviitan Area
{developed by the Regiona] Planning Conference) generally reflects the actual
iancf use and zvning for the vicinity of the prvposed project. The area adja-
cent to I-90 an Sullivan Road i5 zoned as Freewa.y Carnmercial. The Freewav
Comtterci al aorti nq was apormved oni y uDon the development of a wei 1planned
and detai]ed praject Drvpvsal. Sprague is desfgnated for commercial use withr
a proposed maj or comrnercial area at the i ntersectiorv of 5prague and SulZ i van.
A local eenter has deve7oped an the northeast corner of this lveation con-
sisting of a gracery store, variety stvre and restaurant. The proposed pro-
ject site fs designated a5 residential as are the surrounding properties
located between I-90 and 5prague (no density is designated, hawever).
.
57
275
i
The text portion uf the Gamprehensive Plan text for Spvkane County
(March 1970) designates the Reqional Carramercial qenerall_y in terms of per-
formanc2 crateria. It states:
1
The Reqianal Commercial provides a varietv and deDth of "shvooinq
qvods" cvmparable to the centraT business district of the City af
5pvkane, inciudinq in generai merchandise, apparel, and home ?ur-
nishinqs as well as a variety af services and recreational uses.
The Regiona 1 Gorrmerc3 a1 maY eantairr 50-100 stvres oriented araund
ane or more major deqartment stares an a site af 35 ar mnre acres. ~
A Regional Commercial area requires approximatel.y 100,000p250,400
;oersons livinQ within a reasanable drivinq time fvr its support.
The text of the Comprehensive Plan further states under a section af qeneral corrr~nnents abvut cammrcial areas that:
1
al1 camercial areas shvuld be anaiyzed wi th respect to thea r
praximitv to majar throuqh streets, sua^rvundinq carculativn patterns,
interior carculation and access Points to surrvunding streets,
adequacx of aff-5treet parkinq faciiities, relation5hip af site
desiqn to the buiidinqs in the area, nuisance factars-such as
nvise, liqht, odars, etc., buildinq setback from adjacent zanes, 1
number and type of stores and the square faataqe of retaz 1 sales
areas, off-street loadinq and service space, and exterior and
intera or pedestriara tf-affi c flow.
b. The Prababie Impact of tFae Praposed Actiorr +
The most vi sa ble impact wi t 1 be the change of thi s sfte from vaGant
land to a regivnal shapping center. Althaugh a change in the GeneralTZed
Camprehensive Plan Map may nvt be necessary, at shouTd be recognixed that
the Cvmprehensive PTan Text detai7s locatipnaZ Griteria which are ess€ntialZy
hased on perfvrmarace. These T ocativrral criteri a stress prvx-imity to fa5t ~
and efficient arteraal routes and suggest Zocatians at the junction5 of
arteriaT streets bnrdering neighborhoods. These aspects shouTd be analyzed
with respect to relationships to the circulation systern and adjacent zones
and neighborhovds.
The most signfficartt 7ndirect impact of the proposed praject most 1 ikely ~
wi 1 i be the pressure to devel op the adjacen°t nan-proj ect prvperties inta can-
mercial uses. Rccording to Commmercial Land Needs: Part TI--Prnb1 ems and
Fo1 icies, the "most crucial 1iand us@ prahlgn accaszoneci 6y shappTng center
develvpment is the tendeng for vther cvmmerciai development to cluster
araund shvpping centers." It is not unreasonabTe to assume that land use
patterns that have fai lowed sFrogping center de►rei arnents in the past may ~
als❑ prevaii here. Fast food restaurants, cnnvenience stares, office build-
ings, auta service centers, etG., are exampTes. 3hus, the burden may 1ie
wTth the Caunty planning mecManism to control such pressures and pravide for
an arderly gattern of deaelopment which will not be a detrament to the
community at Targe. This project may pra►ride astimuTus to an increase in
land values in the area, if past trends reTating to this type vf deveioprrrent ~
prevail. This passibiTity, however, is dependent-,.on various factors in-
c]udtng prospects for future developnent zoning poTTcies, changes in econnmic
activit,y brought about by the project, accessibility, avaiiability of ameni-
ties, arrd type of land use change. A narrawing of the hvme-buying market
may resuit fnr thase hame owners in neighbgrhoods already pTatted Tntv single-
family lvts which front the arterials, SLfCI1 as the subdivisiQn on the south- ~
67
276
i
or office type develo prnent are ❑n Sulivan, hetween Braadway and 5prague,
and ❑n Brvadway, ppposite the praposed project site.
The 7and use and zvnzng pattern5 of the Tand adjacent ta the narth and
west boundaries of the site seern t❑ he firml,y estab] ished. Howeuer, the awners
af the vacant property zaned freeway commerciaT a3ong the west side af Sullivan
may attempt ta more intehsively utiZ ize their prvpert,y than originaliy intended.
The "suburban-agraculturaT" tYpe uses to the snuth and east af the site wilT
be under pressure (proaided that the existing growth trends contfnue) for
more irttensive residentia3 use and density. The present deveiagment tt-end
is a"hodgepvdge° af 5mai1 clusters of houses as some property awners su6-
divide their five to ten acre parcels, while athers, whv want ta mai,ntain the
existing atmv5pher+e, resist such change. This may create a potentia7 cora-
flict amang cvuntervailing use demands in the area. This has been the
typicai pattern far the Va17@y deveiopment in the past and wi11 like7y
cantinue, until a more comprehensive approach to subdivision approva7 is
implemented. Such appraacYres are now under study by the Cvunty.
It is ❑ossibZe that the rezonirrg of this multi-acre site tv a corrmer-
cial zane to provfde fb r this shvpqinq -center cvuld result in the loss of
control ❑f 5pecific uses of,the sfte. That is to say, if the zorainq were
° accomplished and the provosal to buiad a reqiana1 shaopinq center failed,
the i and woul d remai ned zoned and couldbe conceivabl_y develvped i ntv any
ather use or uses as provided by the zaninq ordirrance for that zone. This
coUid result Tn arr adverse imRaCt due to Tvss af site deveZvpment cnntro].
c. Pleasures to P4itigate Adverse ImpactS
The potential adverse impacts on the traffic systen arad resTdenees
in the fmmediate vicirtity of the proposed project site will be discussed
irr the appropraate SLCtlOfl'S af thi5 document. The adverse impacts relate
ta the stinulus this project shnuZd pravide for rez❑ne and deveiopment artd
cvuld be mitigated by an improved planning prvgramn The exasting land use
plan for the area is nvw being anal,yzed and updated ta reflect nat anly
the actual uses, but aTso such trends. Once these guide7ines, based on firm
pTanning principles, are deve7oped they wiTl 4e enforced urttil such tTme
as changfng community vaZues or gaals may dictate a needed change. By
establishing and maintaaning rativnal guidelines, an orderly pattern of
development can take place.
Land use guide7ines shQU7d be estaaZished as soan as possible, in an-
ticipatian af expected pressures for land use change. The strip alflng
SulZivan between Sprague and aroadway, and the area aZong Broadway acrvss
fram the propased pro,j ect si te are• the cry tical areas of concern. These
areas will undergo the greatest pressure for commercial aaning and develap-
ment. It is reasvnable to assume that deaeTo pnentaT trends that have ❑ccurred
alang similar type streets such as Pines and Argonne Rvads, in the Ualley
and Divisian vPposite Narthtown fn Spakane, will tend to develvp along
Sullivan. Land use pnlicies should now be aeveZaped to retard the prvlifer-
atian ❑f cammerciai uses, yet allaw a more intense usage than presentTy
exists, sQ ttrat Zand values Gan increase somewhat to allaw prroperty ❑wners
some compen5ation for anticipated degradation af 1ow density residential
quality. Cornmercial and retaii uses alvng this strip shauld be strongly
discouraged. Possi6le tases that couTd be ai7owed include multi-family andlar
residenttal office. These uses cauZd act as a buff er tv prvtect the residen-
tial neighbarhoods in the area of the project site.
62
977
i
i
a nc7 uded in the Freeway Commerc ia1 zvne that might aZ s❑ have same val idity
in relationship ta the propas'ed Commercial zone arad its particuTar re7ation-
ship tn I-90, An acceptabl e tlevelapment and traffic pi an shauld demanstrate
that such prvposed deve7oprnent wauld not ancrea5e traffic congestion so as ,
ta break down the design af the 1 imited access highway Tnterchange raearest
to the proposed aane. The impartant criteria tv Co[l51'der, reZative to the
locatian of an appropriate site for a regivnal shopping center, are the
impacts vn the traffic systen, as weTl as on the adjacent residentiaT ne7gh-
6arhaads. The incatian ❑f this particular site in relatian ta major traffic
arteriaTs appears to be ideal, pravided that the interchange and arterTa] ~
access ta hoth the f reeway and shapping center can 6e improved. The impact
an adjacent neighbnrhoods wal l reTate specifical l,y tv the resrdences across
from the prvpvsed praject site alvng 6roadway. These impacts on bath the
traffic system and the adjacent neighborhood wi17 be discussed in detail in
the apprvQriate sections af this doc wment.
1
The ioss of specific site pZan contrrol as described under su6section
b above, can be mi tiqated throuqh the +ase of "contract zoninq". A] tFtouqh
there may be many variations an this theme, the formai intent beinq suq- .
_qested here is that the zoninq be apnroved continqent upan development of
a praject prvpQ5a1 as described in a performance cantraet associated with
a specific site plan. 1
d. llnaaoidabTe Adverse Impacts
The deveZapment vf the prvpased shopping cerrter may prvvide a stimuZus
_ for a changed land use and deveZvpmentai patterns fn the prvjected area. r
These patentiai ehanges da not necessarily need ta be adverse, ta the at
1 arge communi ty, and af gi ven praper guidance through the pl anning process,
they shvuld not be. it may well he, however, the case that thase existing
residentiai uses facinq upon the site and nearby arteriais experiencing
increases in traffic vo7umes, wauld, case-by-case, exper3ence aduerse impacts
to the point of forced relocatian. A propvsal ❑f this saae wzZZ invariably 1
sa affect same residecrts. The possibl e advantage vf thf s si te i s that the
numbers of persons so affected are not as 1 arge as thi5 might be, cansider-
ing the favorabTe locatianal characteristics af the szte,
9. Natura] Resources
4
N/A
10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardnus Emissions
IV/A
. '
!
64
278
~
It is appropriate ta add at thTs point in the diSCuSS10n of "Measures
tv Mitiqate Adverse Impacts" that rrost of the measures mentlaned above re-
quire cvnstructivn ❑f phvsical amDrvvements to handle increased amvunts of
traffac. Discussed abvve have been imRrvVements tv the arterials surroundin4
the site and improvement ❑f the freewa.y interchanqe, inc7uding aff-ramps
and an additionai SulZivan Road bridqe. 5uch imprvvements t❑ the road net-
work wiZ7 nat vn7y ease traffic eanqestion, 6ut wili helq alleviate air pal-
lutian prab]ems by the mmre effective handlinq of traffic. Certatnly of
majnr concern, with reqards to imAroVQniEn$5, is who finances them. It is
quite common fvr the deveTapers wha receive permission to develop to make
road and arterial improvements. It would be therefore, lvqica7 ta assume
the same in the situation. abviousl,y, the entire market area wvuld benefit
from the installativn of this faciTit,y; however, the sponsvrs of thzs praject
max be expected ta partiall.y suaDort the financial r85ROnS1b117tY ❑f tH@Se
3Tlajor 7mprOVement5.
d. Urtavvi dabTe Adverse Impacts
Theincrease of traffic in the site vicinzty, w771 have a major zmpact
❑n the 7oca7 street system, however, if appropriate mitigating measures are
taken, the impact may be 5oftened vnce the insta]]ed measures are accepted.
There may be an unavai dable impact on the resi dents of the area, in that
- any traffi c i n crease might be cohs i dered as adverse.
3.2 Parking Faciiities
a. Existing Conditions
The remrrants of a gravel parking lot is situated in the sauthwest cor-
ner of the propased praject site. Thas lot was used during Expv '74 as
satellite garking for 5pakane Tran~it System express buses intv Spokane. The
parking lat far the Red Liun Motor Inn hvunds the northwest corner of the
site. The County of Spakane Zoning Oydinance require5 that retail stores
and persunal service establtshmVs furnish one space for each two hundrea
square feet of gross floor area (5 spaces per 1,000 Sq. ft. ) and that
offices furnish one space per four hundred square feet of grvss flvar area
(2.5 spaces per I,000 sq. ft.
b. The Prabable Impact of the Prapased Action
The proposed project wiI] inciude on-site parking for the aehicles
expected ta use the shopp3rrg and affice facilities. Parking space far 4,570
automabiies•wall be provided. This parking wiTT 6e at arativ of 5.5 SpdCeS
per 1,000 square feet of gross Zeasabie f1oar area, whach is the standard
recommmended by the Urban E.and Institute bul]etin, Parkinq Requirements for
5hoppinq Centers. This ratio should be adequate f❑r the retaii and affice
mix p]anned for the center.
c. Measures to P3itigate Adverse Impacts
IVane.
d, llnavvidabl e Adverse Impacts
PJone. 85
279