HomeMy WebLinkAbout26205 PE-1651 HITCHCOCK 1ST ADD . ~
•
~ ~
~ 1/2B,1DGPERMIT # -or -FI1E# fz
► -
~
Related File # ( )
Date to Review Date to AA & DR
Date Received 02-19-92
Project Name HITCHCOCK 4M ADD No. Lots 29 No.Acres 8.82
-Section - Township - Range
SITE ADDRESS SE/C OF LONG & 4TH PARCE' I # 19551-0612
Applicant's Name THERON HITCHCOCK Phone # 924-3327
Address 13310 t 13TH-SPO, WA 99216 Work #
Date Conditions mailed --C/ ~
Contact person ART NOLL 13423 f 32ND-SPO, WA 99216 Phone # 926-1561
FLOOD ZONE Yes No J
Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name EUGENE WELBORN
Water 4 Address 7011 EAST 2ND AVENLJE
Sewer a 99212 926-5959
School 356-
Planning Contact Person TIM LAWHEAD Phone # 456-2205
~ Date Submitted Description Initials
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETED
FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED
NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NOT NEEDED
NOTICE TO PUBLIC NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
~
~
1
c\p%review.for ~
~
,
. .
. i
93 1.397
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COIINTY CONIlMISSIONERS
OF SPORANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSED
- ) FINDINGS OF FACT ) AND D$CISION
~
)
THIS MATTER, being the reconsideration by the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County ("Board" ) of the proposed
preliminary plat of Hitchcock's First Addition, Spokane County
Planning Department File No. PN-1651-92 (the "proposal"), pursuant
to remand by Spokane County Superior Court in Cause No. 92 - 2- 03449 -
7; and the Board holding a further public hearing on the proposal
on August 10, 1993, and rendering a memorandum decision on
September 7, 1993 denying the proposal, hereby enters the following
Findings of Fact and Decision:
FINDINGS OF FACT
l. The proposal is located at the southeast corner of Long
Road and Fourth Avenue, in section 19, Township 25 North, Range 44
E.W.M.
2. The proposal consists of a request to preliminary plat
8.82 acres of land into twenty-nine (29) lots for single family
dwellings.
3. The Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, a hearing
body comprised of three members of the Spokane County Planning
Commission, held a public hearing on the proposal on April 23,
1992. Pursuant to Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision
adopted on April 27, 1992, the Committee approved the proposal.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 1
4. On April 23, 1992, Linda Tasca and the Micaview
Homeowner's Association filed an appeal with the Board regarding
. the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision and the Declaration of
Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the proposal by the County
Planning Department.
5. On May 19, 1992 the Board held a de novo public hearing on
the proposal. Commissioner Hasson and former Commissioner McBride
presided at the May 19, 1992 hearing. Commissioner Mummey was
absent due to illness.
6. The Board, by the majority vote of Commissioners Hasson
and Mummey, approved the proposal by memorandum decision on June 9,
1992, and entered written Findings of Fact, Decision and Conditions
on July 7, 1992. Prior to taking such actions, Commissioner Mummey
reviewed the electronic recording of the May 19, 1992 hearing, and
the public record f iles for PE -1651- 92 . This was necessary because
Commissioner Hasson and former Commissioner McBride could not reach
agreement on a decision for the proposal.
7. On August 6, 1992, Linda Tasca and the Micaview
Homeowner's Association appealed the Board's approval of the
preliminary plat to Spokane County Superior Court, in Cause No. 92-
2-03449-7, by writ of certiorari.
e. On June 8, 1993, the Honorable James M. Murphy entered a
Judgement on Writ of Certiorari in Superior Court Cause No. 92-2-
03449-7, remanding the preliminary plat back to the Board for
further proceedings consistent with RCW 58.17.110 and with the
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 2
9. By memorandum dated June 29, 1993, the Board requested the
Spokane County Planning Director to reconsider the DNS issued
previously by the Planning Department, based on information
regarding on-site sewage disposal contained in a letter dated April
21, 1992 from Patrick Brown to the Board/Planning Department. This
was done in furtherance of implementing Judge Murphy's decision.
10. By memorandum dated July 19, 1993, the County Planning
Director advised the Board that after further reviewing Patrick
Brown's letter and other materials, the DNS should be retained.
11. On July 20, 1993, the Board adopted a Notice of Public
Hearing for PE-1651-92. The notice indicated that the Board would
conduct a public hearing on August 10, 1993 for the limited purpose
of receiving additional public testimony on the Planning
Department's response to the concerns raised in Patrick Brown's
letter regarding on-site sewage disposal.
12. Prior to the August 10, 1993 hearing, Commissioners
Chilberg, Mummey and Hasson individually reviewed copies of the
transcripts of the Board's proceedings conducted in 1992 on PE-
1651- 92 , as cert i f ied to Spokane County Superior Court in Cause No.
92-2-03449-7.
13. On August 10, 1993, the Board held a public hearing on
the proposal, limiting comment as indicated in the notice of public
hearing. At the end of the hearing, the Board extended the time
for decision to allow the parties to submit additional written
documentation on the issue of sanitary waste disposal, and to
receive written comments on such issue from Stan Miller of the
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 3
.
Spokane County Water Quality Management Program.
14. On September 7, 1993, the Board issued a memorandum
decision denying the preliminary plat proposal.
15. The record for the Board's September 7, 1993 decision
includes the proceedings conducted by the Board for PE-1651-92 in
1992 and 1993, as well as the public record files for both the
Planning Department and the Board for PE-1651-92. This includes
without limitation the documents submitted by the parties through
August 24, 1992, and the September 3, 1993 memorandum submitted by
Stan Miller regarding the proposal.
16. The Board expressly adopts as part of the record the
transcripts of the Board's proceedings conducted in 1992 regarding
PE-1651-92, as certified to the court in Superior Court Cause No.
92-2-03449-7.
17. The Hearing Examiner Committee's decision comprised only
a recommendation to the Board regarding the approval sought by the
applicant. The oral testimony submitted to the Hearing Examiner
Committee on the proposal was not part of the record before the
Board and was not considered by the Board.
18. The Board takes notice of the provisions of the Spokane
County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, the Spokane County Zoning
Code and the Spokane County Code.
19. The legal requirements for public notice have been met.
20. The original zoning of the property under the County
Zoning Ordinance was Agriculture, which was redesignated to Urban
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DFCISION - 4
Residential - 3. 5 (UR- 3. 5) effective January 1, 1991, pursuant to the
Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code.
21. The property is located in the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan.
22. The gross density of the proposal is 3.28 units per acre,
which complies with the recommended density of the Urban category
and the maximum density allowed in the UR-3.5 zone.
23. The surrounding land uses in the area are generally
single family residences on lots ranging in size from 1-5 acres,
with large animal keeping and agricultural uses still being common
in the area. The area is best described as semi-rural in
character.
24. The single family uses on small, urban sized lots are
generally inconsistent with the surrounding land uses. Land use
conflicts between the proposal and the agricultural
activities/large animal keeping on surrounding properties,
particularly to the south and east, will be unavoidable.
25. While a few plats with urban densities have been approved
by Spokane County in the area of the proposal (i.e. Moen Addition
and Meadowview Ranch Estates), the Board takes notice that more
recently the Board has denied similar proposals. The proposed
preliminary plat Pheasant Park Estates, PE-1701-93, located near
the proposal on the north side of Eighth Avenue west of Barker
Road, was denied by memorandum decision of the Board on September
71 1993. The proposed preliminary plat of Irish Estates, PE-1674-
92, located in the north Greenacres area south of Interstate 90,
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 5
.
was denied by the Board in December, 1992 (the Board's decision was
recently affirmed on appeal in Spokane County Superior Court Cause
No. 93-200363-8).
26. Greenacres Elementary School is located at the northeast
corner of Long Road and Fourth Avenue, directly across Fourth
Avenue from the proposal. The school is currently overcrowded and
children are currently being bussed out of the area to other
schools.
27. The applicant estimated in the SEPA checklist that the
proposal would provide 27 new homes for approximately 100 people.
The proposal would further negatively impact the District's ability
to provide adequate student housing when developed.
28. There are no County parks in the vicinity of the
proposal, and the proposal would increase the need for park and
recreational facilities when it is developed.
29. The roads that would access the proposal are narrow, and
would be inadequate to serve the proposal, particularly Fourth
Avenue and Long Road. Such roads are also used by school children
who walk to Greenacres Elementary School, and sidewalks are needed
along Fourth Avenue and Long Road to ensure the students' safe
passage to school.
30. The proposal is located over the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum
Aquifer. The proposal is also located within the Aquifer Sensitive
Area and the Priority Sewer Service Area designated by the County.
However, public sewer is not expected to be extended to the site of
the proposal by Spokane County for at least 15-20 years.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 6
31. Effective January l, 1994, the Washington State Board of
Health in June, 1993 reimposed density restrictions of one unit per
acre on properties located east of Sullivan Road in the Spokane
Valley and relying upon on-site sewage disposal.
32. While the proposal itself is not subject to the one acre
density restrictions imposed by the State Board of Health, based on
the application date of the proposal, any new development proposals
in the area submitted af ter January 1, 1994 will be subj ect to such
restrictions. This will have the effect of preserving the semi-
rural character and large parcel sizes of the properties
surrounding the proposal, as well as maintaining the lack of
infrastructure needed to support the proposal or similar urban
development in the area, until public sewer becomes available.
33. The proposal as conditioned by the various public
agencies provides for the widening of Long Road and Fourth Avenue,
and for the installation of sidewalks, along the borders of the
proposal. However, outside the limits of the proposal, such roads
would be inadequate to accommodate the additional traffic that
would be generated by the proposal upon development.
34. While the Aquifer Sensitive Overlay Zone currently
authorizes on-site sewage disposal in the Priority Sewer Service
Area, such allowance was premised on public sewer being extended to
the area within a short range of time. The anticipated time frame
for the extension of public sewer to the site of the proposal has
passed and several more years will expire before public sewer will
be extended to the site.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 7
35. The State Board of Health's recent action indicates that
on-site sewage disposal at urban densities in the area of the
proposal poses water quality concerns for the Spokane Aquifer.
36. The Declaration of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the
proposal by the Planning Department on June 2, 1993 did not take
into account the proceedings conducted by the State Board of Health
in June, 1993, which led to the reimposition of density
restrictions in the area of the proposal effective January 1, 1994.
The State Board of Health's action represents significant new
information on the proposal's potential adverse impacts on water
quality that was not available to or considered by the responsible
official at the time the DNS was issued or during the DNS comment
period.
37. The concerns raised by Patrick Brown in his April 21,
1992 letter regarding the impact of on-site sewage disposal from
the proposal on the Spokane Aquifer were amplified in the August
16, 1993 letter from Daryl Way of the County Health District to
Linda Tasca, and in Stan Miller's memorandum to the Board of
September 3, 1993. Miller's memorandum in particular suggests the
likelihood of significant adverse impacts on the water quality of
the Spokane Aquifer from nitrate pollution, if on-site sewage
disposal is allowed in the area of the proposal.
38. Daryl Way's letter and Stan Miller's memorandum,
referenced above, constitute significant new inform,ation on adverse
environmental impacts that was not considered by the responsible
official at the time the DNS was issued or when later reconsidered
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 8
; , .
by the responsible official. Such information was not rebutted by
the letter from Pam Heeter of the Health District of July 15, 1993,
or by the inter-office communication from Michael Antee of the
County Health District to Tim Lawhead of April 8, 1992.
39. The proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan
in several respects. The proposal is inconsistent with the intent
of the Urban category to provide for residential development in a
"city-like" environment, with a full range of public services.
40. The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan anticipates
the presence of public sewer, or at a minimum interim sewage
disposal systems that protect water quality. The water Quality
element of the Comprehensive Plan encourages "fill-in development"
that will have the effect of increasing the cost effectiveness of
extending public sewer while maximizing protection to the county's
sole source aquifer. Due to the effect of the State Board of
Health's action on adjacent development, the density of the
surrounding properties, and considering the length of time before
public sewer will be extended to the area, the proposal does not
constitute "fill-in development".
41. The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan encourages
buffering between proposed residential development and existing
development where land use conflicts exist. While the Hearing
Examiner Committee recommended the installation of a six foot fence
along the south and east borders of the proposal, this would not
provide a sufficient buffer to prevent land use conflicts with the
larger acreages lying adjacent to the proposal.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 9
42. The proposal is inconsistent with the purpose and intent
of the UR-3.5 zone, which contemplates that single family
development will take place in an urbanized setting, with a high
level of urban services. The record indicates that significant
elements of the infrastructure needed to serve such urban density
do not exist in the area of the proposal, nor is it likely to be in
place when the proposal is finally developed, even with the
conditions recommended by the various agencies.
43. There is substantial public opposition to the proposal
from the surrounding area.
44. The proposal does not make appropriate provision for the
public health, safety and welfare, or for schools, parks and
recreation and roads, or for sidewalks that assure safe walking
conditions for students who only walk to and from school, within
the meaning of RCW 58.17.110. The public use and interest will not
be served by the proposed preliminary subdivision, within the
meaning of RCW 58.17.110.
45. Since the Board has decided to deny the proposal, it is
unnecessary for the Board to make a decision on withdrawal or
reconsideration of the Declaration of Nonsignificance issued for
the proposal.
DECISION
The Board hereby denies approval of the proposal and thereby
approves the appeal filed by Linda Tasca and the Micaview
Landowners Association.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 10
.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 9th day of November, 1993
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUN'I'Y, WASHINGTON
~Q~'•• ~ C'i/ r ~ : //i'~PlV)
Patricia A. Mummd
y
L ~
S en Hasson
D. E. Chil 6 g
Vote of the Board of Spokane County Commissioners& s follows :
Commissioner Mummey-Aye to deny the proposal
Commissioner Hasson-Aye to deny the proposal _
Commissioner Chilberg-Aye to deny the proposal
ATTEST: WILLIAM E DONAHUE,
Clerk o the Board .
r
i,
BY=
Ros nne Montague, Deputy C e c
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION - 11
92 0747
No.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF PE-1651-92, )
.HITCHCOCK ADDITION-PRELIMINARY )
PLAT IN EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL ) D E C I S I 0 N
-3.5 ZONE AND ASA ZONE; )
APPLICANT: THERON HITCHCOCK )
Mr. Chairman:
This evening is the date which the Board of County
Commissioners has set to render its decision on PE-1651-92, a
request to preliminary plat and subdivide 8.82 acres into twenty-
nine (29) lots for single family residences.
The Board previously met to decide this item at its June 2,
1992 regular meeting, but the decision was delayed until tonight
because the two Commissioners who originally heard the matter,
Commissioners McBride and Hasson, did not agree on approval of the
preliminary plat.
While I was not present at the public hearing held in this
matter on May 19, 1992, I have now reviewed the file and listened
to the tape recording of the testimony presented at the June 2
hearing. The file reflects that on April 27, 1992, the Spokane
Hearing Examiner Committee approved the preliminary plat, with the
,
inclusion of a fence requirement along the south and east boundary
of the proposal. Linda Tasca, for an adjacent homeowners'
association, appealed the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision to
the Board of County Commissioners.
In the appeal form, the appellants cited as reasons for the
appeal:
PAGE - 1
f7 t
(1) The proposed derisity' was inconsistent with the
surrounding area and endangers the quality of life;
(2) The DNS was questioned due to the environmental
impact of twenty-nine (29) septic tanks; and
(3) That the proposal would be inconsistent with the
homeowner association's request for one-acre parcels.
After considering all public testimony at the public hearing,
I hereby move to deny the appeal of the homeowner's association.
In denying the appeal, I am in effect agreeing with the Hearing
Examiner Committee and approving the preliminary plat.
In making this motion, I am specifically finding that the
density of the proposal, approximately 3.28 dwelling units per
acre, is consistent with the density of the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category provides that properties
within such category should be primarily residential and are
• intended to provide an opportunity for the development of a city-
like environment. The Urban category allows density ranging from
1 to 17 housing units per acre. .
Additionally, I would note that the Board of County
Commissioners recently refused to approve an area-wide rezone in
the vicinity which would have changed the zoning from UR-3.5 to SR-
l. In denying that requested rezone, the Board took into account
the fact that the area was within the Priority Sewer Service Area,
and as such, would be sewered some time in the near future.
Properties of a higher density, generally speaking, can support the
costs of sewering. .
PAGE - 2
It also should be noted th&t •Lh.e applicant in this case is
required to double-plumb all units within the development, as well
as install dry-line sewers to accommodate future public sewers.
This requirement will address SEPA concerns of the appellants.
Finally, I observe that although most of the surrounding
properties range in size from 1 to 5 acres, Moen Addition, located
northeast of the site, consists of residential lots approximately
10,000 square feet in area.
I would ask that Planning Department staff prepare Findings of
Fact and Decision reflecting this motion, to be presented to the
Board at a subsequent public meeting. The Findings should include
a statement of concurrence in the DNS issued by the responsible
official.
DATED this ~ day of , 1992.
BOARD OF COUNrI'Y COMMISSIONERS
. . OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
~L~ • ~
John cBri
~
Patricia A. Mummey . ~
J(/O '
Steven Hasson
ATTEST:
WILLIAM . DONAHUE,
Cle k f he Board
By:
eputy Clerk
PAGE - 3
Pat Harpei
County Engineers Office
No. :33 (3877
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIQNERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER GONCERNING PRELIMINARY )
PLAT PE-1651-92 HITCHCOCK 1 ST ADDITIOti ) NOTICE
WITHIN THE ASA OVERLAY ZONE ) OF
APPLICANT: THER4N HITCHCOCK ) PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN*that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
Washington, wiil conduct a public hearing on
TUESDAY, AUGUST 10, 1993, AT 5:30 P.M.
(or as soon as possible thereafter)
COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY RODM
SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
1026 W BROADWAY AVE
SP4KANE, WA 99260
to reconsider this proposal to preliminarily subdivide 8.82 Acres into 29 lots for singie
family residences within the aquifer sensitive area overiay ione and
Generally located east of and adjacent to Long Road and
south of and adjacent to Fourth Avenue in Section 19,
Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington
NOTICE lS FURTHER GIVEN that, pursuant to remand of the proposal by Spokane
County Superior court, pubic testimony wil{ be limited to comment on the Planning
Department's response, including all supporting documentation, to the environmental
concerns regarding on-site sewage disposal expressed in the Apri! 21, 1992 letter from
Mr. Patrick Brown to the Board of County Commissioners.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person may appear at the time, place and date set
forth hereinabove and present testimony, verbally or in writing, as limited above. The
Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as they deem necessary.
Any person desiring information regarding the planning department's response, as
referenced herein, may contact Wally Hubbard, Spokane County Planning Department -
456 2205
BY ORDER OF THE 60ARD THIS 20 DAY OF JULY, 1993.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON
- •
PATRICIA A. MUMMEY, CHAIR
An z ~ 1993
DISTRIBUTION • OATE:
DEPT. ✓ STATE EXAM V PUBUSH 7/23 y~ FILE 71~~ )e,j
PElaWMED
JuL 2 7 1M
1
) , f ^ .
~ ~
. PEm"-16-5lmw92--
A.LKI. ,,,,,1 '..1 ~ ' . ' i • 1~' .
F '
~z J) • ' f ' . ip
~t-1E
0 P
. . m 'i . • • ~P
I. ,
~ . L.205
-
~ - • --lY Z ; ~ , ` ;
~ . ~
r ' ' M ,
~ ST OFFI
~ r . i.
~ • • • ..~o~
O1(n .J ~ . . . . , aL~Y'
Ni U . ~ . L
E ' CJ ~
.4
~'r n. e5 ~~..r.• o~ , xo
. ~ • ~c oo l ~,r p,~! ~ ~ . _
~ ~ ~ iv ,
~
, ~ .
EL .2 44 9, ~ . . ~ , o .
i s-r
. C . ° • ~ ~ ~ ZNo
SE O►-4 O A
~ z ndAv . .
.
X
.3 a o, ~ ' . ti • ~ r cv .
: • t ~fia N• ~ ~
' . ~ URT u
•
4 V FOuRTN 1
• ~ P r""
~•r~ + a ' _ y
T it Y
{A';'.'~+i,~~
V • ~ ~ r/ . ~ ~q~~ ~~C~Z~ (C•« ,
•<"`J \ ~'~rY'C~;S•\:l`~~yy,~`T~.~~r
• `~~A~`r`}~,~;2•.{Yt.,n ~
t • iA•`{••l.j.V~~~~Nti~l~ Y / •
~ . •
~ ' .
~ e7►~ : ~ IGHTI-t tivE
~ . . . _ . . . . . . _
. co
So , ~
. 0,
~
~ _ < o
• O
. pC
. . . ~
l . "J .
I ~ X C1 ~
, LY .
. < --N
Q4
. ~
v
1
' O
•
~ ~
• -L
~ • ~ti
i . '
f~ ^
cn
` J ~ •
. ~ . w _ . '
~ k
.k
. i
1
♦
♦
~
. ~ .
. * ~ • ~ .
~ r
. j ~
, .
, .
i
.
~
I
~
~A
No. 92 0960 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF T'HE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ) FINDINGS OF
HITCHCOCKS 1 ST ADDITION, FILE NO. PE-1651-92 ) FACT,
WITH EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 ) DECISION AND
(UR-3.5) ZONE ) CONDITIONS
SPONSOR: THERON HITCHCOCK
THIS MATTER, being the consideration by the Board of County Commissioners
of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board", of an appeal of the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner Committee decision of Apri127, 1992 approving the Preliminary
Plat File No. PE-1651-92, known as Hitchcocks 1 st Addition for the purpose of
developing 291ots for single family residences on approximately 8.82 acres of land,
hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal"; and the Board of County Commissioners having
held a de novo public hearing on May 19, 1992 and having fully considered all testimony
presented thereat; and further having individually visited or being familiar with the site and
vicinity in quesdon and having rendered a decision on the 9th day of June, 1992 approving
said proposal does hereby enter the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposal is generally located east of and adjacent to Long Road and south of
and adjacent to 4th Avenue in Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
2. The Hearing Examiner Committee held a public hearing on Apri123, 1992
subsequent to which by the Find.ings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated April
27, 1992 they approved the proposal. 3. The applicant filed an appeal on Apri123, 1992 and listed the following as a basis
for the appeal of the Heanng Exarruner Committee decision. 1. The proposed
density is higher than the surrounding area. 2. The Determinadon of Non-
Significance (DNS) was quesdoned due to the impact of 29 septic systems. 3. The
proposal is inconsistent with area residents proposal to rezone the area to Suburban
Residential-1 (SR-1).
4. At the public hearing owners of adjacent properties expressed concerns regarding
the proposal including higher density than adjacent property, increased traffic, school crowding, pollution of aquifer by septic systems and deterioration of rural
lifestyle.
5. The adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land Use plan
designates the area encompassed by the proposal as Urban. The Urban category is
intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"city-like" environment
and indicates that property within such category should be primarily residential.
The density range of the Urban category is 1 to 17 dwelling units per acre. At 3.28
dwelling units per acre, the proposal is consistent with the density recommended
for the Urban category. The proposal also implements the intent and purpose of the
Urban category.
6. The existing land uses in this area include single family residences, large animal
keeping, agriculture and an elementary school. _
7. The Planning Department's report indicates that the surrounding properaes are
occupied by single family residences. While most of the adjacent properties range
in size from 1 to S acres, Moen Addition, located northeast of the site, consists of
'residential lots approximately 10,000 square feet in area. The Planning
Department's report also indicates that Meadowview Ranch Estates is of similar
density to the proposal and is located less than one-half (1/2) mile southeast of the
proposal.
;r
f-
I .
~ ~~INGS PE-1 651-92 Page 2
' , .
8. The proposal is evnsistent with surounciing land uses and recent suhdivision
activity within the area.
9. The propasai is lvcated within the Pziority Sewer Servzce Area (FSSA) designated
by Spokane County, and will be sevwrered at svme point in the near future.
Froperties grvuped in higher densities, generally speaking, can better support the
costs of gublic sewering. As a condition of approval, the applicant ufill be required
to dvuble plumb all units Vrithin the proposal and ta install d.ry line sewers in the
streets of the develaprnent ta accommadate future sewering.
_ "Ibe Baard of Caunty Cornr,rissioners recently denied approval of an area vvide
rezone in the vicinity fram [Jrban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban
Residential=1 (S R-1), which vvould have required lower densities of developrnent.
In that case, the Board cgnsidered the designadon of the area under the LTrban
category of the Camgrehensive Plan, aund the fact that the area fell insicie the Friority
Sewer Service Area (PSSA) arrd vvould be sewered at some point in zhe near future,
10. The proposal is consistent with the current zoring of the subject pmperty of Urban
Residential-3.5 (L7R-3.5) established on January 1, 1991.
11. T'he prapasal is located within rhe necoxded water service area of the Cansolidated
, Lrrigatian District which has indicate.d it can supply the site vvith adequate water for
dornesic, fire and irnigativn purposes.
12. The prcrgosal is situated with the recQrded f~re service area of Fire Protection
District No. I and the Fire District indicated it can provide adequate serviee to the
site.
13. The proposal will not have asignificant adverse impac[ upon tlhe public healt.h,
safety, and ge~eral urelfau`e especially in light of the candiaons advpted in
eonjunction with the approval.
14. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled.
15. 'i'he pi-ovisions of RCW 43.21 C (The State Environmental Pnlicy Act) have been
complied with and a Deterraination of N'onsignificance was issued. The Baard
concurs with the Determination of Nonsignificance.
16. The Board adopts the PlarLning Departrnent Report and f~ie of PE-1b51-92, as part
of this record, as may be rrivdified by this actian.
DECISION
The Board does hereby apprvve t.he prelfi-ninary plat requ+est subject ta the fvllowing
additional conditions.
I, Achain-link #`ence, 6 feet in height, is required along the site's south and east
boundaries.
' IN REFERENCE TO 'IHE ATTACHED FTNDWGS AND ORZ7ER. 'I'HE BOARD OF
~ C'01 TNTI'Y COMM.ZSSIOIV~~S ADOPTS THE FQLLOWIINCY C[~NDMONS OF
APFRC}VAL AT'TACHED HE.RETO:
SPO~ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. 7`he final pla[ shafl be designed substantially in confornia.~ce vvith the prelianinary
plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall accur without a
change of condition application subrrittal and approval.
2, The Planning DirectorJdesignee shalI re view any praposed final plat to ensure
compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approual.
J ' .
BOCC FINDINGS PE-1651-92 Page 3
,
3. A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number
to be approved by the Planning Director/designee.
4. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
5. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as
amended.
6. The preliminary plat is given condibonal approval for three (3) years, specifically to
July 1, 1995. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a
wntten request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration
date.
7. Appropriate utility easements shall be ind.icated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be
received with the submittal of the final plat.
8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks
from all pnvate, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the
following statement:
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits
are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The
- setbacks ind.icated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are
obtained"
9. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Deparnnent
prior to filing the final plat.
10. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement:
"Lot 7, Block 1, Lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 2 and Lot 6, Block 3 are located on a
temporary cul-de-sac. This temporary cul-de-sac may be extendeti to provide
access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as
development and/or circuladon needs dictate."
11. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet
or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final p1aG
12. A plan for water facilities adequate for domesric service and fire protection shall be
approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County
Building & Safety Department and County Health DistricL The agencies will
certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and
certificarion shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproducdon and be
signed by the plat sponsor.
13. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and
schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of
the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule
shall provide for compledon of the water system and inspection by the appropriate
health authorities prior to application for building perniits within the final plat. The
airangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane Counry and
the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit
due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved
water system.
14. The final plat dedication shall contain- the following statement:
"The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state
health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety
Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the
applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire
protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building
permit for each lot."
15. No build.ing'permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a
Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed
pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat " including a signed license
stamp. The cerdfication may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be
BOCC FINDINGS PE-1651-92 Page 4
' certif'ied on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built"
water system.
16. The Water Plan and the above four (4) condidons of approval regard.ing the Water
Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from
the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple
connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic
and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare.
17. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
18. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with
the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail
delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of
three or more homes.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior To Issuance nf A Buildin Pernut Or u,g,e C1f The Pmq&M As Provosed,-
1,. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to
dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the
preliminary plat of record.
2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing
proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County
Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road
plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities
shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or
the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a
licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed
under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the
County Engineer with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all
improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on th~e approved
construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced.
5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public
right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be
completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount esrimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction
certification, "as-built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed
with the County Engineer.
7. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following-described property be held
in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1)-foot
strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the subd.ivision
boundary. (Temporary cul-de-sacs are required when streets terrninate at the
subdivision boundanes.)
8. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building
pernut for driveway approaches to the county road system.
9. Dedication of 5 feet of additional right-of-way along Fourth Avenue is required.
10. Dedication of 5 feet of additional right-of-way along Long Road is required.
11. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or
curbed to Spokane County standards.
12. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards.
. : ^ .
BOCC FINDINGS PE-1651-92 Page 5
,
.
13. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs,
assigns and successors.
14. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of all internal streets , which is to be
constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installadon of
36 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing is also required.
15. The Counry Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the add.idon of approximately 9-11 feet of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. The constuction of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
16. The Counry Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of Fourth Avenue, which is adjacent to
the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 18 feet
from centerline of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction
of curbing and sidewalk is also required.
17. The proposed subd.ivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane
County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which
resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new
construction.
18. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal azld has determined
that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the
ded.ication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein
specified.
19. There may exist utiliries, either underground or overhead, affecang the subject
property, including property to be ded.icated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocarion
regarding these udlities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to detemiine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocarion costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work.
Special CondLtion ti
20. Both Sth and 6th Avenue shall continue to the eastern edge of the proposed plat, with a
1 foot dedicadon at the eastern ternunus. Cul-de-sac design and dedication should
reflect this continuation of Sth and 6th Avenue.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer d.isposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is
conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County
Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific applicadon
approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
2. The dedication shall state: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant
to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)'
property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit [he owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formarion of a ULID by either
petiaon or resolurion method under RCW Chapter 36.94."
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for
connection to future areawide collection systems."
BOCC FINDINGS PE-1651-92 Page 6
5. A dry sewer connecdon to the future areawide sewerage system shall be
constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection shall be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or
any attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of
record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies,
Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written
approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the
submittal of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utiliries, Spokane
County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies
within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
7. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domesric irrigation use and
fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must
have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health
authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protecdon
district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy
their respecave needs. Said water plan and certif'ication will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
. 8. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water
plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor
for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time
schedule. The dme schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water
system and inspecrion by the appropriate health authorities prior to applicadon for
building permits within the p1aG The contractual arrangements will include a
provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health
District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a
building pernut due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the
approved water system.
9. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane County Health District that a suitable sites for on-site sewage disgosal
systems are available on all lots.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfacrion of the
Spokane County Health District that the existing on-site sewage disposal system
serving the residence located on Lot 4, Block 1 is wholly located within the
boundaries of the lot.
11. Subject to specific applicarion approval and issuance of pennits by the health
officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site
sewage systems may be authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water
systems is prohibited."
14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water
system, as approved by county and state health authoriries, the local fire district and
~
BOCC FINDINGS PE-1651-92 Page 7
purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for
individual domesdc water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale
of each lot."
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met. This includes but is not limited to the
following:
2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction
and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads
should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be
controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction-related acriviries.
3. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved
surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces,
measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
4. All debris that results from this project must be disposed of by means other than open
burning.
5. For health and air quality reasons all travelled surfaces should be paved.
6. Solid fuel heating device(s) shall meet provisions of SCAPCA Regulation I, Article
VIII.
7. Failure to comply with federal, state, and local air quality regulations may result in the
issuance of penalties.
SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1
1. This plat requires the installation of two fire hydrants. One shall be installed at Sth and
Long, and the second hydrant installed at 6th and Long.
2. Prior to installation of hydrants an approved water plan shall be submitted to the Valley
Fire Department, Consolidated Water District No. 19, and D.S.H.S.
BY TF-E ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS 7 DAY OF JULY, 1992.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
.
~~Jo R. cB Chairman
'I .
Patricia ~ mmey
;,7
.
S tev Has ,6n `
ti
Vote of the Board of Spokane Counry Conunissioners as follows:
Commissioner John McBride - Aye
Commissioner Patricia A. Mummey - Aye
Commissioner Steven Hasson - Nay
. ~ . . ~ -
BOCC FINDINGS PE-1651-92 Page 8
ATTEST:
E. DON
1 of the Board
By:
Rbsanne Montague, Deputy Clerl
OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR DATE AND PLAC'E FnR CnMMENCING AN APPEAL
NOTE: Pursuant to WAC 197-11-680(5), notice is hereby given by the Board of
County Commissioners in conjunction with the approval of the above- referenced matter that:
(1) That time limit for commencing an appeal of the approval of the above-
referenced matter, as provided by County ordinance, is thirty (30)
calendar days from the Board of County Commissioner's execution of
the above Find.ings of Fact, Decision and Conditions.
(2) The ame frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the
approval of the above-referenced matter is thirty (30) days after the
execution of the above Findings of Fact, Decision and Condidons.
(3) The appeal of either the approval of the above-referenced matter or any
SEPA issues must be filed in the Spokane County Superior Court or a
court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law.
SPOKANE COUNTY AP~ ~ 7 1992
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS nF FA('T_ CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER~
_ ~ . ~ . . _ ~ ...._.....s
INTRODUCTION
This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on Apri123, 1992.
. The members of the Committee present are Frank Yuse, Chairperson, Lunell Haught
and Harry Gibbons.
PROPOSAL The sponsor, Theron Hitchcock, requests approval of Hitchcock 1 st Addition,
PE-1651-92, Preliminary plat in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone
and Aquifer Sensitive Overlay (ASA) Zone.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The property is generally located east of and adj acent to Long Road and south of and
adjacent to 4th Avenue in Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWNi, Spokane
County, Washington.
2. The committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record.
3. The existing land use(s) in the area are single fa,mily residences on parcels ranging
from 1 to 5 acres in area, large aniinal keeping, agriculture and an elementary school.
4. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban. The Urban category is for the
purpose of creating a"city-like" environxnent, including residential densities of 1 to
17 units per acre, or 3.28 units for this proposal.
5. The Arterial Road Plan designates Long Road and 4th Avenue adjacent to the site as
local access streets. Exisdng right of way width for both streets is 40 feet. A S foot
dedication for roads is required by the Spokane County Engineer along the site's
Long Road and 4th Avenue.
6. The existing zoning of the property described in the applicarion is Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5), previously established in 1991. The proposal meets the standards of the
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone.
7. The provisions of RCW 43.21C ('The State Environmental Policy Act) have been
complied with and a Determination of Nonsignificance was issued.
8. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled.
9. The owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposal. Concerns
expressed included impacts on the aquifer from septic systems, school overcrowding,
lot sizes incomparible with adjacent properties and traffic hazards.
10. The proposed use is comparible with existing uses in the area.
~
HEC Order for PE-1651-92 Page 2.. ,
11. The existing zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan.
12. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or
welfare. '
13. The subd.ivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County
subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in
accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County.
CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL
1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the
"Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs,
assigns, and successors-in-interest.
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
1. A fence, six feet in height, is required along the south and east boundary of
the proposal subject to a licensing agreement from Spokane County Engineering
regard.ing right of ways on Sth and 6th Avenue.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary
plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a
change of condition application submittal and approval.
2. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure
compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval.
3. A final plat/name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number
to be approved by the Planning Director/designee.
4. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
_ 5. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as
amended.
6. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to
May 1, 1995. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a
written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration
date.
7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be
received with the submittal of the final plat.
8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks
from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the
1
HEC Order for PE-1651-92 Page 3
following statement:
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits
are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The
setbacks indicated on this plat may be vaned from if proper zoning approvals are
obtained." •
9. Three (3) current certificates of tide shall be furnished to the Planning Deparnnent
prior to filing the fmal plat. 10. The plat dedicarion shall contain the following statement:
"Lot 7, Block 1, Lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 2 and Lot 6, Block 3 are located on a
temporary cul-de-sac. This temporary cul-de-sac may be extended to provide
access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as
development andJor circulation needs dictate."
11. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet
or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plaL
12. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be
approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County
Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will
certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in
conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and
certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be
signed by the plat sponsor.
13. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual amangements and
schedule-of unprovements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of
the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule
shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate
health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The
arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and
the purveyor hannless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit
due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to sarisfactorily complete the approved
water system.
14. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement:
"The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state
health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety
Department and water purveyor, shall be installed withi.n this subdivision and the
applicant shall provide for inclividual domestic water service as well as fiure
protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building
permit for each lot."
15. No building perrnit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a
Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed
•
pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat ulcluding a signed license
stamp. The certif'ication may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be
certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built"
water system.
~
HEC Order for PE-1651-92 , Page 4, ~
16. The Water Plan and the above four (4) cond.itions of approval regarding the Water
Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from
the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple
connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic
and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safery and general welfare.
17. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat
18. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with
the United States Postal Service to detemune type and location of central mail
delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of
three or more homes.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior To Issuance Of A BuildinLy Permit Or Use Of The Provertv As Pronosed:
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to
dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the
preliminary plat of record.
2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing
proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County
Engzneer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road
plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities
shall be subnutted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or
the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a
licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easemerits shall be performed
under the d.irect supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the
County Engineer with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all
' improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved
construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced.
5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be
. completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction
certification, "as-built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed
with the County Engineer.
7. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following-described property be held
in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1)-foot
strip at the ends or edges of all streets that ternunate or border the subdivision
~
HEC Order for PE-1651-92 • Page 5
boundary. (Temporary cul-de-sacs are required when streets temunate at the
subdivision boundaries.)
8. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building
pernut for driveway approaches to the county road system.
9. Dedication of 5 feet of additional right-of-way along Fourth Avenue is required.
10. Ded.ication of 5 feet of additional right-of-way along Long Road is required.
11. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or
curbed to Spokane County standards.
12. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane
County standards.
13. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs,
assigns and successors.
14. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of all internal streets , which is to be
constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of
. 36 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing is also required.
15. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the add.ition of approximately 9-11 feet of
asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
16. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of Fourth Avenue, which is adj acent to
the proposed development. This will require the addirion of approxi.mately 18 feet
from centerline of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction
of curbing and sidewallc is also required.
17. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane
County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which
resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new
construction.
18. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has deternuned
that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the
dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway iriaprovements herein
specified.
19. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be ded.icated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocarion regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make
arrangements for any necessary work.
HEC Order for PE-1651-92 Page 6. .
Special Condition:
20. Both Sth and 6th Avenue shall continue to the eastern edge of the proposed plat, with a
1~foot ded.ication at the eastern terminus. Cul-de-sac design and dedication should
reflect this continuation of Sth and 6th Avenue.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer d.isposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is
conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County
Health District and is further condirioned and subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health District
2. The dedication sha11 state:
"The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant
, to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)'
property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
unprovements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either
petition or resolurion method under RCW Chapter 36.94."
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the - Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
4. The dedication shall state: "Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for
connection to future areawide collection systems."
5. A dry sewer connection to the future areawide sewerage system shall be
constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection shall be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Deparnnent.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or
any attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preluninary plat of
record for distriburion by the Planning Department to the utility companies,
Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written
approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the
submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal methai shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
~ HEC Order for PE-1651-92' Page 7
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies
within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
7. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and
fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must
have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health
authorities. T'he health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection
district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy
their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a
transparency suitable for reproduction.
8. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water
plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor
for construction of the water system, in accordance wi.th the approved plan and time
schedule. The rime schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water
system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for
building penmits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a
provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health
District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a
building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the
approved water system.
9. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane County Health District that a suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal
systems are available on all lots.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfacrion of the
Spokane County Health District that the existing on-site sewage disposal system
serving the residence located on Lot 4, Block 1 is wholly located within the
boundaries of the lot.
11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health
officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
12. T'he dedicatory language of the plat will state: Subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site
sewage systems may be authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water
systems is prohibited."
14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water
system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and
purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for
individual domesric water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale
of each lot."
HEC Order for PE-1651-92 Page 8. _
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met. This includes but is not limited to the
following: '
2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction
and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads
should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be
controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction-related activities.
3. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved
surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces,
measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
4. All debris that results from this project must be disposed of by means other than open
burning.
5. For health and air quality reasons all travelled surfaces should be paved.
6. Solid fuel heating device(s) shall meet provisions of SCAPCA Regulation I, Article
VIZI.
7. Failure to comply with federal, state, and local air quality regulations may result in the
issuance of penalties.
SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1
1. This plat requires the installation of two fire hydrants. One shall be installed at Sth and
Long, and the second hydrant installed at 6th and Long.
2. Prior to installation of hydrants an approved water plan shall be submitted to the Valley
Fire Department, Consolidated Water District No. 19, and D.S.H.S.
. ~ HEC Order for PE-1651-92 Page 9
QRUyj$
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and
Conclusion, APPROVES the application of Theron Hitchcock for the Preliminary
Plat as described in the application PE-1651-92 known as Hitchcock lst Addition.
Motion by: Harry Gibbons Seconded by: Frank Yuse
Vote: (2-0) TO APPROVE TBE PRELIlVIINARY PLAT WITHIN TBE EXISTING
URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) ZONE AND AQUIFER
SENSITNE AREA (ASA) OVERLAY ZONE
HEARING E R CO E
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE
Frank Yu se, Ch ' an Aye
Harry Gibbons Aye
~tl k QQR,
Lunell Haught ~ ~ Abstained
ATTEST.
For WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
,
By PAUL F. JENSEI~~
Senior Planner ~
V-27- ~F ? .
Date
Pursuant to County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written
decision to the Spokane County Board of County Connmissioners within ten (10) calendar
days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be
scheduled. If-you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal,
preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners,
W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$120 processing fee payable to the
Spokane County Treasurer.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456-2205.
.
~
. ~
. .
17
^
`
,
~
. ~ ~
~
~
~ • ' ' , ,
. , ~~u,r
.
1 q8~ u
, .
~ . 1 ,
~
. ,
~ ~
t
r ~
• ~ j Q.~-e
~ ~ ~ ~ •
.
i, 3 , 5
,
- ~ .
, . ~
~ .
~ ~ A/I ~
- ~g,..~-►~' a'~ ~i+~~%"~~~l~ ~
YO THE 80ARD OF COUNTY CQMPII SS IONERS
Appea 1 Fee - $4.00,: 00-
. ,
Today' s Ua te /V -,40S
Name : ~
Address Zi p Code: 4&0/
-Nome Phone:_ 2V-54l4 8usiness Phone:
Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee ACtion Being Appeal ed
~ Title:
preliminary SubdiviSion Numb
Zone Reclassification Number:
Da te of Nearin9 Examjner Committee Action: 2.-/)
.
: Signature: ~
. Signature of Authorized Representative: .
Address: ; YOUR REASONS'FOR APPEAL ~
. • , s / ~ S
; . ~ ~ '_1 ' c.,~~~.
;
~
7
~•7 Q ~y - ~ j.L` ~ ,
Tr~
-
_
~
-----'r'----
: OFf ICE USE ONI.Y t
,
: ,
~
< Co es to : Pl anning- ~ngineers_ Environmental Nealth
~ p1 ~
~ Fe e Received: Check r'Cash- ,Receipt tiumber
k '
~ Hearing Oate:
,
. . ~
Z0 ' d Wd6b : Z E66t `EZ ddd OdS .ll I -iI lfl : Ol SNWWOD J,1ND ~Nd710dS : WONJ
. 5-.-a.... ,g
• .
P ~ w=1651m9l.
r mmmmmm~ ~~r . .
k L K 1 ~ W..s' t .,d .3 ..1 ..X .,7 ' ..1 a
' -r- T JI E.
s. , m ` Z P~
ST OFFi
~ Q1~ O •i.`"'•' ~ ~rne~r ~ .
~ . M U AL
' d
`J t4
~1' e
C $ ~ ° ,
oO ( Y,~ 1~~( • 'i , ' .
0
~ ~ ^ N Q ~ Z ~ ~y 1 ST . ,
, -
zNp a -
t. ~ SEcOND A
. 2 nd A•.
J R p, • . . . N•. ; r ~ N ' .
i • ; Q .
~ URT ~ v m M
FOUR7H /
' r il YE. •:c•: , ~:::•::~r: ' l~~'2} - r'~
1 . . . . . . . :i f;::r t~::' ~ii~
. . ~--T-~5
~ ~ M N !.ti~~~C•~ ' ~?~•~l~'lJ/~1 ~
y f' `•.rk: , ~
I. l, a ~,:5:: s.;.+ _
Q ~ fµ:.
L '.•~:4: ~~,t.L,'~ t.v
1
. , , .
^ i 8rN
. . 9~E►GH7H AvE ti
. ►
~
, . ~
. . . ~ .
~ • X
<
. ~ .
~
~ ~ I . •
O~ '
. ~ • cp ~ `
_ . Z .
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92
-Page 29
~ •
PE=1651792
i v I 1 , 'r.~ J J
K '
. ~ , ' • ' ~ 3.~ ~
N
~ W ' f~ . • • . ~ . • . p
. m
~ , r - - • _ - Z ~ .
. ~ 'f~• ~ ~Z • i~ c
. ~ T o
~ B.2 ilcn ~ ~ w ~ c~ , ~
° URU3*
3
1-2
• Y04! ~ ~ ° • ► -
:ri - ~ • . ~ _
'1 ST . .
f~ t 20 Ss-ONo A\
, ~ • Z n~ A~ . ~ r
~ ~ ~ ' • r . N ~
1 RD.~~ ~
U T V M FOURTH
~ , ~•;:r~.»,~i:#<•`•~`::;
.
VX3*5 U-1305
~ i~~ ~ N :.t4..t•':~ ..._?2~•
1l1
( . _
v:::'`'•~~:r:;'r:;: .
%~:.:.:;:;:i'.'t';
.141
. ~ .
~ . 1
1 .
e-rH .^vc. E.I GHT H AV E -
,
. ,
.
URw3e5 " co .
• s4 ~ ' o~ ,
< O-
' O -
.
. . ~ ~ Wm15 W C, ~ URVSI~
~ Y • 'C~
SRml 04 ~ `
. ~ ~
. . _ ~
_ ~ ~ r ~ 1
0
..b - - ' - - 1 f 1 ►..~.r t
' W
~ ' ~
I
~ • • . ~ ,
y ( ti
, . .
V ' . (0 .
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 . Page 30
~ PitELinurrAxY i~~ATor
~ . ~
N ~
H---r---'CHCOCK'S IST .C1 ~J ~lJ I1 IO N ,
m
C-)
R N4e~~-r NE.I/4, SLC.19-25-45
h rr
• zo tiu ru<Ir~Cwcc iob ioh tOd. io4 io4 ,
~ I F L[OAL 011C►IITIDM .
t.t~~1~~ tw 0~~~
L ~tel• Adalt~~ t* Orru
IA 0 7? I.at. 1.wd 1•i C
~ F'} ! r . •i~ .1 ♦t.e.. lo ie ~P.~.~. r..Aie~e. ,
O Co
-5 a'- - - I ' 2 3 9• . • .
r} - +~foy•.. Gc1tf,Ol • .
SLir%L
O FjtOGK ~0 L•'r
'
f .~oroico uiu tinvl. h.ltr
~ l NUnI[Il 0/ lOtl~ 71
m ' -•i r-'==-1 r,;t tr.. Lor 1100 ia. tt. '
Gm~tit~ ~ ~ 111T [OM[1 UR 7.
~~i[Il~. rrllc
t . rt,xMl V[~1a.
_ I Z I ~ ~ O 1 •,s L. ~ COMO
WXSrC. ~.ouc
, • -
~ , ~ - - .
N N ~t~ AvE. 'N ~STEr~V,CuI,-OE•S/.c. ~AC~IK~Jf
Pi
ti0 . Fwct WaV--HwY 90
. •;i ~ ~ I
. .1~
O 55' 8~v4 Se~GtiCx~ ~ ~e l Y .
f
- f1 0
7
(3Lo(,sc [ ~ d'`.-4 y
o ~
J F4l M(
I Sc~~c I'-5o VICiN17Y MAo
Q ~ Q y / (1~0 SGhIC~
o t I l4 SS ~IIDk. JE7 ~cK L! ~ ~ ' Y ho ' .
. TEMO.Cut,-Dc.-SA.c
p ~i6 Av E. o •
~ N
I ' Tnl~ ..p r.i ►~~►•~~d Dr ' ,
•t tAr c~d~~~t ~1 T~~IOn Nlt[hCOtI
ry5' eL0(, SCT 8 ~CK
0 ~ 2 ~ t} 5 (o '`.•:d /so¢3{~~M~
. ~ gL oc.K
2 tto 104 ioa 104 104 104 •,~~~y~n .
1
0 i i ~ i~ ~ •
1Jo t E: OuLK ruC µ0u) E AT E i9o0'L To Rcµ~% ~l, •
pL. L OYNE4 STRUCTuQr, S fo $EQEMOVCD, ~u~~up~Ny RESIOENSE ~S ~.1'190f. . VRf.BOFlN~:
'p ix asco►+o ^vs. ,
(L ~~09f 926-~959
lD ! ~ ^
Joa.1 c.zsvt ' .
W . .
~
'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: April 23, 1992
SUBJECT: Hitchcock lst Addition, PE-1651-92, Preliminary plat in
the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone and
Aquifer Sensitive Overlay (ASA) Zone.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Theron Hitchcock
E. 13310 13th Avenue
Spokane, WA 99216
Agent: Art Noll
E. 13423 32nd Avenue
Spokane, WA 99216
Surveyor: Eugene Welborn
E. 7011 Second Avenue
Spokane, WA 99212
Contact Planner: Tim Lawhead
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to Long Road and south of and
adjacent to 4th Avenue in Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
Proposal: The proposal is to subdivide 8.82 acres into 29 lots for single family
residences.
II. SITE INFORMATION A. Site Size: 8.82 acres
Gross Density: 3.28 units per acre
B. Comprehensive Plan
1. Land Use Plan: The property is locat~ed within the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is primarily a residenual
category and is intended to provide the opportunity for the development of a
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 32
"city like" environment. The Urban category allows for a density range of
between 1 and 17 housing units per acre.
' The proposed density of 3.28 dwelling units per acre is within the
Comprehensive Plan guidelines.
2. Arterial Road Plan: The proposal is bounded on the west by Long
Road and on the north by 4th Avenue. Both of these streets are designated
as local access streets.
C. Site Characteristics: The site is essentially flat. Most of the site has been
cultivated for many years. Two residences, a cotta.ge, a barn and 3 sheds are
located on the property. All of the buildings on the site will be removed except
for the residence located on lot 4 of the proposal.
D. Neighborhood Characteristics: The subject property consists of 2 parcels approximately 4.5 acres each. Surrounding properties are occupied by single
family residences. Most of the surrounding properties range in size from 1 to 5
acres. However, the Moen Add.ition located northeast of the site, consists of
residenrial lots approximately 10,000 square feet in area.
E. Zoning Analysis: No rezone is proposed since the proposal meets the
standards of the existing Urban Residential-3.5 Zone. The Urban Residential-3.5
Zone was established on the site on January 1, 1991 when the new Zoning Code
was fully. implemented. Prior to that date, the site and surrounding area was
z,oned Agriculture under the old Zoning Ordinance.
North: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established on January 1, 1991.
South: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established on January 1, 1991.
East: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established on January 1, 1991.
West: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established on January 1, 1991.
F. Land Use Analysis:
Site: The northern portion of the site is currently occupied by 2 residences,
a cottage, a barn and 3 storage buildings. The southern portion of the
site is under culrivation.
The proposal involves dividing 8.82 acres into 291ots for single
family residences. All existing buildings on the site will be removed
prior to development of the proposal except for the residence located at
E. 18002 4th Avenue (Lot 4, Block 1 of preliminary plat).
, North: Greenacres Elementary.
South: Single family residences on 2 to 5 acres.
East: Single family residences on 2 to 3 acres.
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 33
West: Single family residences on 1 to 5 acres.
G. Circulation: Most of the traffic generated by the proposal will access the site
by way of Long Road to and from Sprague Avenue or 4th Avenue to and from
Barker Road. Fifth and 6th Avenues will be extended across the site to provide
access to the interior lots. Fifth and 6th Avenues will terminate at the east
boundary of the site in temporary cul-de-sacs which may be extended east in the
future to provide access to adjacent property. .
The proposal's internal street system will be paved to a width of 36 feet. Curbs
. are required. Long Road and 4th Avenue will also be improved with paving 18
feet wide from the center line of the streets to the curb. Sbreet widening and curb
are only required on the sides of Long Road and 4th Avenue adjacent to the
proposal.
H. Design: The preliminary plat proposes 291ots on 8.82 acres. The average lot
size is 10,400 square feet. The average street frontage is approximately 100 feet.
I. Density: The net density, excluding roads, is approximately 4.2 dwelling units
per acre.
J. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and
approved by the Counry Engineer's Department prior to development.
K. Water Supply: The proposal is within the Consolidated Irrigation Water
District.
L. Sewage Disposal: On-site sepric tanks and drainfields will be utilized for
sewage disposal. All units will be double plumbed and dry line sewers will be
installed in order to facilitate connection to the public sewer when it becomes
available.
M. School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 356. The
school d.istrict has been norified of the proposal but has not commented.
N. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. The Fire District
and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve
fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat.
0. Cultural Resources: None have been identif'ied.
P. Parks and Recreation: There are no County parks in the vicinity of the
proposal. The closest park is Terrace Park located on 24th Avenue approximately
2.5 nailes west of the site. Terrace Park has playground equipment, ball field and
swimming pool. _
III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental. Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the
County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal,
4/92 HEC S taff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 34
other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible
standard Cond.irions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other
County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has determined that "No
probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed
and has issued aDg1emuna~ian of Nondgnificance ("DNS").
The "DNS" was circulated to 9 other agencies of jurisdiction and other
agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment.
The "DNS" comment period ends Apri121, 1992 and was advertised 15 calendar
days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within
400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The
Hearing Examiner may consider addirional environmental related testimony at the
public hearing.
I V. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The proposal is in conformance with the guidelines of the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The Project meets the standards of the Urban Residential-3.5
Zone.
The typical size of adjacent properties is much larger (1 to 5 acres) than the 10,000
square foot lots being proposed. Another project known as Meadovwiew Ranch
Estates was recently approved by the Hearing Exanuner Committee and the Board of
County Commissioners. Meadovwiew Ranch Estates is of similar density to the
proposal and is also surrounded by larger parcels. Meadovwiew Ranch Estates is
located less than 1%2 mile southeast of the proposal at the intersection of Barker Road
and 8th Avenue.
Conditions are attached which have been recorrunended by the Planning Dept. and other
County Agencies. The Planning Dept. recommends that the proposal be approved
subject to these conditions.
V . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall
be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the
owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
i i. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision
of record.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the
"Applicant", which terrn shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs,
assigns and successors.
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 35
2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat
of r.ecord. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of
condition application submittal and approval. 3. The Planning I?irector/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure
compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval.
4. Af'inal plat/ name/number shall be indicated before the ~'inal plat is filed, such
name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee.
5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
6. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as
amended.
7. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to
May 1, 1995. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written
request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date.
8. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approval of uti.lity easements by appropriate utility companies shall be
received with the submittal of the final plaL
9. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks
from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the
following statement:
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time builcling permits are
requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The
setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are
obtained."
10. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department
prior to filing the final plat.
11. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement:
"Lot 7, Block 1, Lots 5, 6 and 7, Block 2 and Lot 6, Block 3 are located on a
temporary cul-de-sac. This temporary cul-de-sac may be extended to provide access
to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development
and/or circulation needs dictate."
12. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or
exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
13. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protecrion shall be
approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building
& Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the
Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in confonnance with their
respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certificarion shall be drafted on
a transparency suitable for reproducrion and be signed by the plat sponsor.
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 36
.
14. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contiactual a.mangements and
schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of
the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule
shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate
health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat The
arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and
the purveyor harmless fromclaims by any lot purchaser refused a building perinit
due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved
water system.
15. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: '
"The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state
health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety
Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the
applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire
protecdon to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a build.ing
pernut for each lot."
16. No building pernut will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a
Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed
pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat " including a signed license
stamp. The certif'ication may be in the fonn of a letter, but is preferred to be
certif'ied on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built"
, water system. 1
17. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water
Plan may be waived by the Plannin,g Director/designee upon receipt of letters from
the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple
connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic
and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare.
18. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
19. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with
the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail
delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of _
three or more homes.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance C)f A Building Pernut Or Use (Jf The Pronerty As Proposed:
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to
dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the
prelinunary plat of record.
2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as desi•gned to County standards showing
proposed street centerline and-curb grades shall be submitted to the County .
Engineer for approval prior to construcrion and/or the filing of each final plat; road
plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 37
3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities
shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construcrion and/or
the filing of the final plat. Drairiage plans to be prepared under the direction of a
licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
4. Constniction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed
under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the
County Engineer with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all
improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved
. construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced.
5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public
right-of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the Counry Engineer.
6. All construction within the e3cisting or proposed public right-of-way is to be
completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the
County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, constTUCtion
- certification, "as-built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed
with the County Engineer.
7. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following-described properry be held
in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1)-foot
strip at the ends or edges of all streets that tenninate or border the subdivision
boundary. (Temporary cul-de-sacs are required when streets terminate at the subdivision boundaries.)
8. Individual driveway access pernuts are required prior to issuance of a building
permit for driveway approaches to the county road system.
9. Dedication of 5 feet of addirional right-of-way along Fourth Avenue is required.
10. Dedication of 5 feet of additional right-of-way along Long Road is required.
11. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or
curbed to Spokane County standards.
12. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane
County standards.
13. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs,
assigns and successors.
14. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of all internal streets , which is to be
constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of
36 feet of asphalG The construcdon of curbing is also required.
15. The County Engineer has designated Typtcal Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is adjacent to the
proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 9-11 feet-of
asphalt along the frontage of the.development. The construction of curbing and
sidewalk is also required.
4/92 HEC S taff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 38
16. The Counry Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two,
Local Access standard for the improvement of Fourth Avenue, which is adjacent to -
- the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 18 feet
from centerline of asphalt along the frontage of the development The construction
of curbing and sidewalk is also required.
17. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane
County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which
resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new
construcrion.
18. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined
that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the
dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein .
specified.
19. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject
property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition.
Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility
purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or
the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make
anrangements for any necessary work.
Special. Condition:
20. Both Sth and 6th Avenue shall continue to the eastern edge of the proposed plat, with a
1 foot ded.ication at the eastern tenminus. Cul-de-sac design and dedication should
reflect this continuation of Sth and 6th Avenue.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is
conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County
Health District and is further cond.irioned and subject to specific application
approval and issuance of pernuts by the Health District.
2. [The ded.ication shall state: ]
"The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place
their name(s) on a petition for the formation of IJLID by petition methal pursuant
to RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the fonnation of a ULID by
resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)'
property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or
successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of
improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either
petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94."
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1.651-92 Page 39
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
4. [The dedication shall state: ]"Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for
connection to future areawide collection systems." 5. A dry sewer connection to the fucure areawide sewerage system shall be
constructed. Plans and speci~'ications for the dry sewer connection shall be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department,
.SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or
any attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of
record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies,
Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the
submittal of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the
Regional En•gineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies
within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
7. A plan for water facilities adequate for domesric use, domestic irrigation use and
fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must
have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health
authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection
district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy
their respective needs. Said water plan and certi'fication will be drafted on a
transparency suitable for reproduction.
8. The purveyor will also certify prior to ~'iling the final plat on a copy of said water
plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor
for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time
schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water
system and inspecrion by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for
building pernuts within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a
provision holding 'Spokane County/City of Spokane, Spokane County Health
District and the purveyor hamiless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a
building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the
approved water system.
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 40
•
9. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane County Health District that a suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal
- systems are available on all lots.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane County Health District that the existing on-site sewage disposal system
serving the residence located on Lot 4, Block 1 is wholly located within the
boundaries of the lot.
11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of pernuts by the health
officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site
. sewage systems may be authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water
systems is prohibited."
14. The plat ded.ication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water
system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and
purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for
individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale
of each lot."
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
NO COMMENTS
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All air pollution regulations must be met. This includes but is not limited to the
following:
2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction
and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps,
sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads
should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be
controlled, as well as emissions from all other construcrion-related activities.
3. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved
surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces,
measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces.
4. All debris that results from this project must be disposed of by means other than open
burning.
5. For health and air quality reasons all travelled surfaces should be paved.
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 41
r ,
6. Solid fuel heating device(s) shall meet provisions of SCAPCA Regulation I, Article
VIII.
7. Failure to comply with federal, state, and local air quality regulations may result in the
issuance of penalties. SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 1
1. This plat requires the installation of two fue hydrants. One shall be installed at Sth and
Long, and the second hydrant installed at 6th and Long.
2. Prior to installation of hydrants an approved water plan shall be submitted to the Valley
fire department, Consolidated Water District No. 19, and D.S.H.S.
4/92 HEC Staff Report for PE-1651-92 Page 42
- t ,
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Secrion 11.10.230(3)
SPOK:A.NE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDIlVANCE
FILE NUMBER(S): PE-1651-92
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:. Preliminary Plat of Hitchcock lst Addition within
. the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone.
APPLICANT: Theron Hitchcock
E. 13310 13th Avenue .
Spokane, WA. 99216 ,
(509) 924-3327
LOCATION OF PR4POSAL, Generaily located east of and adjacent to Long Road and
south of and adjacent to Fourth Avenue in Section 19, Township 25 N., Range 45 EWM, •
Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has detennined that it does not
have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) is nDi required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made
after review of a completed enviranmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this
DNS must. be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., April 21, 1992, if they are
intended to alter the DNS. v
RESP(JNSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR
By: 'r'im Lawhead, AICP, Planner II Phone: (509) 456-2205 .
Addreu: Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99260
)ATE ISSUED. 1992 SIGNATURE: g,
. , . _
COVS4ENTS RMARIINGEN'VIEZCNNIENI'ALCJONCERNS VAIJOCNE ATTHE
HEARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA
99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten
(10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project.
This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual
objecrions. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA
appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA Sta.te Department of Ecology (Olympia) -
2. WA State Dept. of Health
3. Spokane County Health District
4. Spakane County Division Engineering
5. Central Valley School District No. 356
6. Fire District No. 1
7. Consolidated Irrigation District ,
8. Spokane County Air Pollurion Control Authoriry
9. Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department
• i r ,
i ~ ~
r ~
i
, 1 • ,.r PLANNING DEPARTMENT '
. : _
)aO+Aw( COV+r, COVa1 -OV3C
P12ELYMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATYQN
PART I
JvFR AY, YNrnR ,M~TTnN
A . aF
NAME OF A.PPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: ThP r on H i t chrn_C_}r / Ar t;hu r NQ 11
MAILING ADDRES S: F_
CITY: Spokane STATE: Wash. Zjp: 99216
. PHONE: 9 2 6-15 61 (work) 9 2 6-15 61 (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPR1CSENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Theron hitchcock pHpNE: 924-3327
MAILING ADDRESS: _ E. 13310 13th. Ave, • ,
CITY: Spokane STATE: Wa sh . ZIP: 99216 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 8. 8 2~saS- r e s ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) n o n e
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S 0F PROTECT/PROPOSAL S 51 91 .06 1 *2 & 9„5J 9I . 061 1
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED None STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL ~ _ I_g4Q2 4-tb _ ~xfo •
EXJ.STIlNG ZONE CLASSIFXCATION(S) (DATE ESTA3LISHED) T1R 1.C; EXISTING USE OFPROPERTY t,wn -z tngLP fami 1Y_ homes, and vacant
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY . URBAN
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley School District N0. 356
FIRE DISTRICT SPokane County Dist.#1 WATER PURVEYOR C•I.D. No,. 19
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
S ingle family dwellings (X) Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
Njori,n . t ha.#' w P 3x-l- a w a r p n-f . .
B. LECrAL 7NFORMATInN: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: cn»t.heast: corner of 4_tb aX.d Lonct 1
SECTION 19 TOWNSHrP 2 5- RANGE 45 ,
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: 44;7n Aya,
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRON"I'ING ON PUI3LIC ROAD:6~,1 I on 4tr u, & 6101 on Lonci
- DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN A.RTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL O YES .(x) NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS R-C.t arr 1;•- ah, a
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPEi2TY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE
LfiGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMLNARY SUBDIVISION
MAP.
► .
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
V
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? Real Estate
Sales Agreement ( Copy Attached )
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS QF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Urban designation under the Spokane Cotmty Comprehensive
Land Use Plan; ZoninR Designation as'UR 3.5
WHAT IMPACT WIL.L- THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE AD~ACENT PRQPERTIES?
All of the adjacent properties are also Zoned UR 3.5 see EnviramentcU Checklist)
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? ProPosal is within the P. S. S.A.
consistant with bath current Zoning and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAI,'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? As the adj acent Zones are also UR 3. 5, there are
no un iclue measures proposed to mit igate conf lict ing land uses.
C. PRELIMINARY SCJBDY'VISInN C'rENERAL INFnRMATInN:
NUMBER OF LOTS: - 2 g GROSS AREA: 8.82 acres TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 102400 sq. feet PROPOSED NET DENSITY*: 4.0 unitsl acre
SMALLEST LOT SIZE: 10,400 sq. feet MMMUM FRpNTAGE: 100 feet PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: -
Individual wells Public system ~ Private Community System
Other ( ) - Describe:
PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: .
Public sewcr O Community system O Y Septic tank and drainfield ~ Double Plumbing (XK Dry Sewer rl Other Dcscribe:
UTILITY COMPANIES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PR4VIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL:
ElecLric;cy: Washington Water Pawer n Sewer: Spokane County Utilities Degt.
Gas: Washing-ton Water Powgqter: C.I.D. #19 Phone: P•N.W.B. DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY-
PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDTTIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THZS
PROPOSAL? Yes No ~X) IF YES, EXPLAIN: -
D. PREL7IVZZNA.RY SIJBDZVISZnN Z1v11'RnVEMENT TNFnRMATZnN:
LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PRQPOSED: Private roads
Public roads (XK Arterial raads Tract X roads
DESCRIBE ANY COMB3NATION OF ABOVfi:
~
ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EX.PECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: ,
Spring of 1993 ~
IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDTVISION PROPOSED? Yes No ~j
IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP.
IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Yes O No*J
IF YES, DESCRIBE:
* NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MJNUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA.
1 SUBDIVISION APPLICATION , Page 3 of 4
PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVTDE THE PLANNIlNG DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRZTTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELTMINARY CONSULTA'IION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSUT.TATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO TEE PLANNIING DEPA.RTMENT.
FZRE MARSHALL/FZRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FTRE PROTECTIO NO. ~
B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) HAVE NOT BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
TN PROVIDTNG FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER STEM AND FACII.ITIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW : ; OR UNA.BLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINTTNE; ANll WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUII.DING PERMTT
APPLICATION TIME.
/P~'b~ t♦
D. REQUIREMENTS II~(CLUDE: ~.l7~`~ 7'r Z
yl~•~ ~~J/r'3 i~
y ~
~
FIRE llIgTRICT ~ SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE
WATEYt PURVEYOI2
A. S ATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS F F.SDC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUTREMENTS (HAVE) HAVE NOT BEEN MADE.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: AAOU~6~4 '
WATER DISTRTCT SI6NATURE/h'ITLE r DATE
COUNTX ENGINEER -
A PRELTMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
,
,
74 ~ .
, SIGNATURE I E DATE
COUN1'Y U'1'ILX'I'TES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMI7TAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (NA-VZ (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNA'I'E-D
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS
A. COMMENTS: l)rn,,))4 h t- ~ Sew''e Az c; Z
SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE
HEAL1'H DXSTRIC"I' '
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION PIAS TAKEN PLACE GENERAL REQUII2EMENTS FOR .
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (ff,kVE NO BEEN SATISFIED.
A. COMMENTS:
. /7
S.
v SIGNATUREII"ITLE
SE'4VER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEtiVER AItE UNDERS'COOD IIY TFIE APPLiCANT. .
A. COMMENTS: '
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
(
. ,
SUBDIVISION APPLZCATION Page 4 of 4
PART 1111
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
HE LEGAL DESCRIl'TION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR
VISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOK:A.NE COUNTY
~ ON REG TIONS AND WS STATE OF WASHINGTON.
.
z,: Q r• I: ~D DATE:
. •
150 D PHONE:
ZIP:
~9•:~FC~s1E~ , .
LANU .
p ART zv
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UND.CR PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF-RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE
PREVTOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS
WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. SIGNED: TherOn Hitchcock DATE: February 10 , 1992
ADDRESS: E. 13310 13th. Ave. PHONE: 924-3327 Spokane, Washington 99216 ZIp: 99216
,
'v-
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) . ) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN TO/AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
Febxvarv , 1992, BY Theron Hitchcock . NOTARY SEAL
Notary Public in and for the Stat ashi gton
Residing at: Spokane, Washingt n . ,
My appoinlmcnt cxpires: June 18, 1992 ~
.
PART v
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTNIENT)
DATE SUBMITTED:
DATE ACCEPTED: BY: '
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
~ ~ .
. ~
\
~,t~
~
~
_
~
~ _
1. ~
SEcrrio
.
- ~ _
SPOKAHE E;{YIR01fF1EHTAL OROIH1UlCE •
~ • .
(11AC iJ1-11-96J) Section 11.10.Z30(1) ' • .
Envirorxnental Checkllst '
. file Ko. '
' Purpose of Chcckllst: ,
The Statt Enrirorxnental Dplicy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RC11, requires all 9overnnental agenCles to Consider tht envlronmental tiapacts of a proposal
before sneking Aecisions. An Environirental Impact Statement (E(5) musc be prepared fo'r all proposals wlth probable significant adverse tnpatts on
the quality of che environment. The purpose of this checklist 1s to provide information to help yov and Che aqency ldcntify impatts frora your
proposal (and to reduce or avoid impaccs from the propozal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether in ElS iz required.
tnstructions for Applicantz: -
This environTOental checklist asks you to destrlbe sone besic informatlon ab at your proposal. Governmental agencits use this checklist to determine
whether the environmental impactz of your proposal are significant, rcqutrln9 preperation of an EIS. Answer [he questions briefly, xith the most
precise infornation knawn, or glve the Dest descrlptlon you can.
Tou must answer each question acturatc:j :,,L ,:L:,.'i'.ly, to the best of your knowled9e. In most cases, you should be able to answer the Questions
. fron your own observations or project planz without the need to hire cxperti. if you really do no[ knox the answer, or if a question does not aPPlY to your proposal, write 'Eo not knou' or 'Coes not epply.' Cornplete ans++ers to the questtons naK may avoid unnecessary delayz later.
So ne questions azk about governn+ental-reoulations, suth as zoning, shoreline, and landmark desfgnations. Ansuer these questSons if you can. If you
have problems, the 9overrvnental agencics can assSst you.
The checklist questions apply Lo all parts of your proposal, even 1( you plan t0 do the+n over a period of time or on 6lfferent parcelz of land.
1lttach any additional lnforn+acion that v111 dezcrlbe your proposal or 1ts envfronrnental cffects. The dgency to v1►{ch you submit this checklist may
ask you to ezplain your anzvers or provide additional tnfo nnation reasonably related to deternining 1f there may be sfgnificant adverse impact. .
~ . _
tlse of checklist for nonproject proposals: "
Complete this checklist for nonproject propozals, even though questlons may be ansxered 'dx s not aOplY'•
' IN ADOITIOH, caapletc the SUPPLET4ENTAL SNEET FUR HO!tP$OJELT ACTIOKS(Part 0).
For nonprosect a~tions, ihe references in the checklist to the ~.~ords 'prpjett,' 'appllCant,' and 'yroperty or zite' shauld be read as 'propozal,'
'proposcr,' and affecCed geographlc are:,' respectirely.
A. BACKGROUKD
l. 'tarne of proposed project, If appltcabte: __Ji1tChCOCk'S Second_ Addition ,
z. 4ame or AQPlicant: Theron Hitchcock 3. A6dress ana phone nLnb« of appllcan: or con:zcc person: E. 13310 13th. Ave. ; Spokane, Washington 99216
( Art Noll; E. 13423 32nd. Ave.; Spokane, Washington 99216) '
4. Date checfclist preparea: F e b r u a r y 10, 1992
5. Aqency requesting checklisc: Spokane County Planning Department 6. Proposed tining or scheduie (inCluEing phas{ng, if appltcable):PY'211I11111aY'y plat ap.plication 2-14-92;
Preliminary Plat Hearing April 1992; Final Plat approval and recording
August/September 1992; Build out and sales complete 6pring 1ti~. ,
7. a. Oo you have any plans !or future addStlons, expansSon, or (urther activlty related to or connectcd with thls proposal? If yes', ezplaln.
The sponsor has no present plans for any expansions or future
activity in this area. .
b. Oo you own or have options on land nearbr or adjacent to Chis proposal? !f yes, expliin. Z'h2 SpOT1SOr does I10t OWI1 I10r
have any options on any property adjacent to'or near this porposal.
8. list any envSronu+ental fnfonr+ation you knox about that has been prepared, or Kfll'be prcpared, directly related to th(s proposal.
No special enviromental_information- has been prepared with respect
to this proposal. '
Rcr.2/1/88 • 1
spor-un LNVIAON?MH'LAL ORDINA2ICE
-'(VAC 197-L1-960) Scccioc 11.10.210(1) ~ •
L. b.ACCCYOIIiTU (coo[lcued) • '
9• Do 7w lmov v?ucrer appllcaciooA ►re peodin; ior aovernocncal •pprov•ls o( ocher propouls dlrectly atfeccing the propercy covared by your
pcopoaal' I[ yca, erplain. •
The sponsor is not aware of anv other nr.oposals that -are Dendincr '
that relate to this project. v 10. Li&c any goveromenr approvals or pcrmita [hac viLl be needed [or youc proposal, 1f k,o K,. P r P 1 i m i n a ry P 1 a t- a n n r ov a 1
Final Plat approval, approval of the water plan, approval of the
r
Spokane oad plan's and drainage plans by Spokane County; building permits;'approvai ot ary-line sewer pians; septic tank permits rrom y i;Y a',---A-i--s-t, - - . _ -
11. Glvc a bc'le[, cacnplctc dcscription of-your proposal, lncluding che propoaed usci and the alze o[ CTu p[oJecC and siCC. -he[e are' aeveral
queatlons L tcr in Chla checkllec ttut e3k,you co dcetClbe cer[ain sapecca of your proposal. You do not need co ceput thoie ansvera on Chls
P°8t• T-b-A Prnnn.-,a 1 i C C f
and-L.o n g
Road. It is a portion of the NE 4 o f S e c t i o n. l 9; T o w n s h i p 2 5; R a n a e 45.
The proposal is to divide 8.82 acres into,29 lots for single family homes. ,rypical lot size is I0,400 sq. feet. There is an existing home anci mobile '
--irorm-- c.)=V uatbuitdiii h-omr~- 17a
-bp- !.;em.ov-ed € ra m t-lie s ite_ 'T'-h-e as rP~ ~ 11ncle.-Ir +hom
. Comprehensive land use Plan and is currPntly zoned Urban residential 3.5.
The site is directly south of an existing elementary school, and is surrounded
by simular UR 3.5 zonedroerties......
l:. Loca loo o( chc propoeil. Glve suf(icienc info clon or a pcr.on to undcrstand the prcciic locacion o( your propoaed p•o}cct, lncludlnr, a
sccecc addcesa, iC any, and ,cetton, covnahip .ad range, 1( knovn. It propo ul vovid oeeur over a range.o: erea, prav(de ehe range or
Douodicica of Ehe alCe(a). Provtdt a lcgal deser(ptLon, tlze plin, vtelelt7 MA p, xnd topog[aphie m.ap, L( [c:sonably ava:!a b`le. kTilc you
should subalc anr pLana rcquJ.red bp c agc~ ex~ you are not requltcd co dup lei q! ps oc de ai d L ni bmlCt~cd vlch ern ~eatlon
rclaLcd co chls checkltac. ~OL1I1 ea$t eorner o~ 4~Il. ancf tohgICoaQ ZTl ~ c+~ I1~ gpa lc~cane
Valley( Greenacres). A portion of the NE 4 of Section 19; Township 25; Range
4-') r;.W.M. .
_._Legally dPscribed as Lots 7& $ n_f (`Qrbi n Addi tio„n to r;reenacxes a~ pe_r
plat thereof recorded in Book "S" of Plats, page 30; situate in the
County of Spokane, State of washington. Commonly known as E. 18002
4iGti. tive..
l]. Doea chc propoaed aeelon 11e v![hln the AQu.i(er Sens[Cive Acu (ASd)? :tx Ge c.1 $ever.Secvtee A,ree? 7Tq r oL1[y S ver ec e£ Arca? 'he
City of Spokanc? (See: Spo~Caae Covncy'e ASA Overlay Zonc AClaa (or boundir/ee). e S 1 t e 1 1 e S W 1 1 n t~~lle
A.S.A. and the P.S.S.A..
10 6L COtMlZD bT APYLIC1.Ni
B. QfVIROR`SL2P".AL LLLTQNLS '
Evaluaclon For
Agency Use On1y
1. EAR''TI •
A. Geacral deserlption of Che alte (eircle one): fLac, rollirtg, hllly, 3Ceep slopeS, aovn[ainovs,
o c Ae r: TI),o s3.-~ bav a jO 21:gZpA Y i n d
of time and is verv flat. b. !!ha[ ta [he aCeepest !ilope on [hc iltc (approzlaace percent alope)?_j p S9 t h a n
e• 'TaC gencral C7yea oC soile aLe found on the alte (for example, tlny, aend, gcavel, peaC, muek)?
I! you knov the claaslfleaclon of a;clcultucal ioi L,speel(y [hco snd noee any prio.e' (aevland. ,
The soils are characterized as GgA (Garrison gravelly loam)by the soil survey from the U.S. ' D .
d. Ire thcYe surCaee indleatlonA or TiscorJr o[ utuCable •olls !n S1u immtdlate vleinl:r? If ao,
ac.cri~. There are no surface in dications of any
unstable soils in the area.
SPOKAKE EkY]RONMEHTAL ORDIHAHCE
(uAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENYIROtWEH7AL ELEMEHTS(continved) .
Evaluation For .
' Rgency Use Only
e. Oescribe the purpose, type, and approximate quantlties of any fi111ng or 9reding proposed. '
indicate source ot f ill. T~,o n --fill}ng pro , sp,d ft-h e '
the site. There will be some qradina of the road
to provide for dr-ainage and also for 11208" swales. "
t, Cov{d eroslon o aur as a result of clearin9, const~uction, or use? If so, qenerally describe.
The site is very flat and does not•lend itself to
erosion problems. The soils have moderate to very
rapi(l NeYIueai~iiiicy .
q, ADaut whiat percent of the stte x111 be covered xith Impervlous surfaces ter proj ct cQnstruc- .
tion l(or example, asphalt or buSldings)? A pp r o x i m a t e 1 y ~ V°o O t 11 2
site will be covered with impervious surfaces and/or
homes.
. .
h, Proposed measures to reduce or control eroslon, or other lmpacts to the earth, 1f any:
As t.h.e~ site does not lend itseld to erosion, no
special measures should be required. The site will
utilize 11208" swales for surface water drainage.
.
2. AIR
a. uhat type of esnissions to the air wouid result fraa the proposal (i.e., dust, autanobile, odors
industrial, xoo6 smoke) durtng canstruction and when the Qtoje[t is completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantices If knawn. _I e r e W 1 1 1. b e
an increase in dust during construction. There will be
an increased levels of automobile emissions consistant .
with an increase ot juu auto trips per aay. • t'me ci-no
J
w1 1 1--trC Cl-n
b_ Are there any off-st[e sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? lf so,
generaily describe. N=P know~ nr identified-.
e. Proposed measures to reduee or control emisslons or other Smpacts to ai tf ny:
As the overall area developes to urban e)
densi-tT~-_a &h~= fnass tv-,~~~t fz-,e; , ; t; es
W 1~ i be !Y Y 0~~" I~ a-ad G' r Pc[,~ ~~y1iL._ of W oVd
stoves will result in decreases in the levels of wood'
smoke.'During construction*, road will be watered to
reduce dust creation and also to prevent ort-sI-ce -
trak:nL,Lty
3. uATfR
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface xater body on or in the lmmedtate viclnity of the site includinq year-
round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, destrlbe type and
- provide names. lf appropriate, statc xhat stream or rlver 1t tlows in[o.
None known or indentifiable on the site. ,
(2) u111 the projeet requtre any xork over, in, or adjaeent tu (NICM n 200 f a t) the destrSbed
waters? If yes, please descrtbe and ittaeh aviSlable plans. '
Not applicable, see above.
SPL`IGUfE LXVIRONMPLI,L ORDIWICL
' (WAC '_97-11-950) Secclon 11.10.230(1)
D. LNVIRON?MN7AL ELEHZN'5 (contlnucd) •
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
Escimatc the amount of flll and dredge materlal chat vould be p Lced 1n oc rcmoved froo che
surtace va,cc or vetland• and indiu ce che arca of [ht sice t M c vould be •fEccted. Indlca[c
che eourcc of [ill meCerlal. TT~} anr~ (G) V111 the proposal requirc surtaee wuter vSthdrAvalr or diverslona? Cive •-ene[al deaerip-
clon, purpose, and approxlmaCe quantltiea, lE knrn+n. rPb,ip pr-n.n-S-a 1 wlll nnt
result in the withdrawal of any surface waters.
(S) Does che proposal lie vl[hln a 100-year (lood pLln? It io,.note loeicion on•che iite plart.
The site is not within any 100 year flood plain. (b) Uoes the proposal involvc any dlsthargee o( vaste materltla co surfste we[ers? i[ so,
dencrlbe the type of weo[e and aneleipated volume of dlaeharge.
The proposal does not involve the discharge of any
materials inLO surrace wdLerS. -
b. Cround:
(1) uill groundvacer be vithdravn, or vlll vaccr be diaeharged to groundvaeer? (;[ve general deceripclon, purpoae, and approxlnace qu.anciclcs, Lf leiovn.-T-b p nrnposal Wi-ll ]Je '
served bv Consolidated Irriqation District #19. TYieir
primary source of water is from wells. They indicate that
they can serve the site. Any water aiscnargea Lo
g r a d .
O I7 °'t°''7 scr r
,tc m c• Rntil-.a.n.21 rl-P.C` t 1.C111 t..CL_S.e •.I.'_.°~'' z-
(2) Dceeribe vaste o.acerial [hat vi.Ll bc disthargcd ln[o the gtound Crom sep[it tanks or o[her
eaai[ary vaace cru taen[ fae111c7. Dcaecibe chc gen<ral rize o[ che system, ehe nuabeC ol
houses to ac set`ved (lf applitAble) or the number o( yerson. [he sysCeo(e) are expfetcd eo
.,.r-cEfflurant. frnm on ~~t-.P ~~stems will be consistant witfi approved svstems. S.C.H.D. regulations for installation
and operation will be followed. There will be 27 new
, on-slte systems. ATI-homes wY`Z"I-'be a
1.. L.
a v ,..a-r~ .{-r, r. ;
n d-~tr- r ~-izrc a 2~re~. :1.. =~~--E-~ 1 i t a t e f u t u r e c o nn e c t i o n.
0) Dercribc any syaccsa, other chan thoae designed Cor [hc Alspo u 1 oC saRlt & ry vascc, lnetallcd !or ehe purpo.e o[ dl,ehsrging tlulda bclov [he ground .urt•ee (lnelvdei ,yieens eueh .
aa thoae for che di3po.•1 ot scorm vatet or dralnaae froo iloor dralni). Deseribe chc trpe of
sysecm, thc aoounC o( materlal to bc dlaposed o( [hrough Che •yaCcm and thc Cypes oE natcrials
ltkcly co bt dliposcd of (lncludirtg matcCial• vhlch naY e ter [he ~ s[ea Lfu dvc 5ccncly Chcou h
syllla or aa a ccs+tlt of (ircfl=hting ttcivltlcs). 11 20611 swales LD I_~e used for
the disposition of storm water. As the pr,oposal is
for residential uses, there wili not be bu1K storage of any crizical--M-a-icefta-r5, o-r-tYrc
fac11,1.,~~~.
(4) Will anr ehealu 1s (eapeeially or=anlt oolvcnca or pe[TOleum Cue L) be aeoted ln abovc-
~~o<id., o` 1~or
storcd? go '1Uui1e'o9Fo `r'Age I6f ' a"nhAyt
4
SPOKA?fL LTI9IRONTZN'fAL ORDIIIANCE -
(vAC.197-11-960) Secclon 11.10.230(1) ~ .
E. LNVIROhTL1rfAL Ll.LTSLtf:S (continued) ' •
Evaluacion Fot
Agency Uae On1y
(S) Nrat protec[lvc oeagu[et will be taScen to inaurc Cha[ lu ks oc spill• of anr cheoltals .
stored or uaed on s1te vill noc bc aLloved to percolatc to groundvater (this includcs aeu urca
to keep thtaltals out ol disposal syatcae descrlbed irt 3D(2) anA 3b(3)'
c. Vater P.uno(t (lncludins sCOtn vaccc): (1) Deacribc the •ource of runo[f (lncluding .corm vater) and oeelod of collection and dl.posal
it any (includc Quantitica, if knovn). urere vlll chis vetcr (lov? ulll cRis uowcer ,`lov into '
othcr watere' If so, describt. Th4on}srdeTrti= }a!c►y~le
8 0 u r-s P#.
=
ruaoff wi11 be from imn rvinus su farPs.
swales will be used to pre-treat runoff.
(2) :I111 any chemicala De rtored, hendlcd or used on chc elce ln a locaclon vhere asplll or •
leak vl11 drain to sur(ace oc groundveter or to a storn vatcY dleposal yyetem diacRarglng to ~
3urtace oc groundvacer?TlhArP --{-~o .
~r.rc.~n~~
ti~.~~~~
. chemicals, but there will be very sliaht chance of•
discharge into-surface or groundwater.
(3) Could vsecc oateclaL encc[ g[ound or sucfacc ~.wtcrv? IL eo, genecally dcscclbc.
There is alwaavs tlle cba~nce of waste materials
being,.introduced into ground and surface waters. .
However, such occurances would be rare and strictly '
ac:c:idenica.L. -1-neYr scope wouia De siignz as a .
d. Fcoposcd acaeurea to Teduce or tontrol sucfsce, ground, anG cvnof( vatcr 1mpacc I , lE aay (1(
t thc proposcd acclon ltes vlchin che .lqul(cr Scnaicive Ares bc e.pcclally clear on exp?anacloo•
r rclscing Lo feeilicic• eonecrnins Seecionr 3b(4), 3b(5), .nd 3e(2) oC ch1s eheekli.c}:
The proposal will utilize measures as required by
the Office of the Spokane County Engineers
to reauce impacts to grouna anct surtace waters.
. PIAYTS .
a. r:hetk or tlrele t7Dc of vegecA ilon found on Che ei[e:
dcttduout crce: alder, naple, aspen, oChcr. .
cvergreen Ccec: Ili, tedar, plne, other. 3hruDt.
grese
paa[uie.
crop oc graln.
vec aoll plente, eaetall, bu « ereup, bullrush, .kunk c■bA&ge, ocher, ,
we[er plancs; w cer lilly, eelgraea, alllotl, othe[.
• ochcr [rpea o( veSeCatlon.
b. uhac klnd and amovnC of veSetaClon ylll be rmoved or •Ltered' Q2f-l„e r i.t e =rccr, Gavn •
t
cu1 ti vat-~Pd fnr manst vea~ .~t ~aresent it bas been
plo~~ed, in part; and~the remainder has the stubble
~frm Rrior crops. '~he top few inches of soilwill be removed.
e. l. sc t reA c ed or endangered speelea ovn to be on or near the iice. '
None -
d. Proposcd landecaping, u.e o[ natlve plancs,.or ocher mea.ures to reserve or enhante ve eCaCloo
on the .i<<, Ir any: Landscaninc~ consistantwith resic~ential
do s r o l n pm o prt ~ ?ca-W t-rcP S-cv . ~ .
. 5 '
SPOY.AnE £NYIROHNENTAL ORDIHAI(CE
(WAC 197-11-960)' Section 11.10:230(1) ' • _
B. EHYIROfAiENTAL EIEHEHTS (conttnueG) .
Evaluatlon For
" Aqency Use Only •
5. ANIHALS
a. Lircle any airds and animals xhich have been observed on or near the site or are knarn to be on
or near the site:
blyds: hawk, heron, eagle, songDlyds, other:
mamnals: deer, bear,, elk, beaver, other: ~Ypa 1 1 Y[")(~P1'li-.R '
fish: bazs, salrtan, trout, herring, shellfish, other: ,
other: • b. lSst any threateneC or endangered spectes kno++n to be on or near the site.
NLn.n,.p k n.c~w n o r ah c r~ r v P ri .
c. ls the site part of a migration route? If zo, explatn, n
rni~ t- P _ '
7
d. Propozed aeasures to preserve or enhance wildllfe, if any: * (Z pz_r_~ cz cyf h i rdc
and rodents that utilize the present habitat
are adaptable to the habitat created by residential
development and the concurrent lanciscaping.
'I'here qtTT-b e d--mtn-m
6. EI►ERCI AND HATURAI RESOURCES } P }.~aa} ~e dpcreas iPdiversity of species.
a. 41hat kinds of energy (leL~fr, rt~CuPbb~; `Sr6od s v s ar) w 1 be use o mee the
the completed project's energy needs? Oescrlbe xhether it uill be used for heating, manufac-
turing, etc. -T-h,o ~~~~~~l xill ttt ilize P1 Prt ric0 natii
ral gas
enerav Drimarilv. Wood and solar eneray will probably
have minor applications. Energy will be for residential
uses only.
b. Would your project a(fect the poten[ial vse of solar energy by adjacent propertSes? if so,
generally describe. .
Tlip t..np.cugr apYy.af-thp czzi_t.P ;q -quc'h t r a t
there will be no affect upon adjacent properties
that would preclude the use of solar - ener-gy.
. c. 11hat kinds of energy conservation (eatures are inclu6ed in the plans of this proposal? list
other proposed measures to rduee or control energy tmpects, if any:
Th.P pr~~J rlrLp_.q not presJl,de the use of a
broad ranqe of energy conservation_measures by
individual home owners. The fact that it is consistant
wi £h f"ne comprenens ive pian ( 1TFft'tl develup=nt
~GJ prUiLlUbe . . . . .
7. ENYIRONHEMTAL NEAI.Tlf
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, tncivding exposure ta coxlc ehemieals, risk of (tre .
and ezplosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that eould oceur as a result o( this proposal? If so, '
descriDe.
?~j.p.~ 1r:_n_ g.~,~} h 1 r~
~l) Dezeribe special emergency servlees ihat might be required.
ThP a.ep-r~q af thp P-ronosal are within the .
ca.p. ' G a-f nT_r?sPnt- eme gencv services.'
il'd 5 j aZ~ ~E'Ed2t~ .
b
S:'.I'I.~:.t LltVY'~OtML~'T:.I. 07CDI1Ul;+C'~ • ° (uAG 197-11-960) : S.ccion 11.10.230(I) .
S, •L!fVIxONf~121L LI.DfLNTS (eoncinued) . Lvaluatloo For
LUV1R0?iTQ11:AL 1iL1lL:N (continucd) Ageocr u.e ortlr
(2) Tropoted eeasurcs co Tcduce or control ::'.lronnental he&lch hazaTds, 1f anr:
7a,T r. i rl e.n tif iab~ lZe ent r i r ement-. 1 b. e-, 1 a- h haz-+ r~
amP assori atPd wi th th'P nrnj~al for rsi d_n - i al housina.
b. Noi oc:
(l) uhac crpcs o[ noise exiot lo the arca vhlch ur a[tect your project ((or cxaoplet [raflfc,
equipment, operation, o[herT rUl., Ci-t,, ic Gparse_lT V Topula i.. p8 '
t
at present, however the adjacent elementary school
does have higher,levels of noise due to buses, and traffic.
There are no other sources ot noise at present. (t) t7hat typei and levels of nolse vould bc creaEed by or associated vlth thc project an a
sAort-tero or ■ lona-terea Lasio (tor cxaeplc: [taU ic, constructlon, opcration, other)? Indl u te
vhat hour# noloe vould coae (rou the •1[e. Tp {-'h P -qhL)rt. term R there W111
be increased levels of noise consistant with construction. •
In the long term, there.will be an increase innoise
- levels associatea wizn zrs new singie ramliy iLurties. dn7d-ttri= I ome s .
(3) Proposed eeasure to reduee or eontrol notre Sepaets, i( any: '
No special measures proposed.
8. U:1D AND SIl0AEL111L USE
i. Vf+&c ir thc current uie of the jite ind iQj.cent pro ercies2
° --ThA T i-t-R -3 cu.r-rjen t 1 y
izsed for two rQSadepces and some crop production.
D. „~e tAd,~~Q'?Ata W9,%P1cAAQ,1109, 4kA01001 , res idences and some agr iculture .
'CY-P cz i t-P ha cz bi-tz-n u sed f r) r q4r;_r, LLt,n r P. LJ-, ts- c a p a b 1 e
of limited production of crops such as corn.
Its size precludes viable utilization for
exclusively agric}~~tural usts. c. Descrlbe .n7 •cruccurce on the +tce. ere are WO residenees OI1 the
. site, one a mobile home to be removed. There are also
three small she,ds, a barn, a large shed, ana an .
uld .Ati ~ co 0th-~ ~ha-rr-tlr~= r~-~d e n c e
3t--3r - 1-94-92 44-h- TTZ-i-~--IQ@-reamm$w$'_a - d. Will anT •tructures De deoolfshedt If ro, vhicfi? A 11 s t r u e t u r e s
. other than the residence at E. 18002 4th. will
be demolished. The mobile home at E. 1/yUb 4tn
wlii ute tC1Vl:dt,CU.
e. Nhat 1s the curtertt sonin; elassifleatton of the s1[ei [J • R. 3.5
4h,t 1s the eucrent eooprehenilve p L n deoignAtion ot the site! URBAN .
9. If applltable, vhat 1s the cutcent shoTCline *as[er proarAn dtslgnation o( [ht eiteT
. , .
L
His .nr part of the sitc eceo clastified u an "eoriroaaen[ally nenslt~ve' areaf If so, 'Pe1f 71• Not agnlicable, no sensitive Sltes. '
L. Approxinately hov m.ar people vould reside or vork in [he eoopletad pTOjeeti
PYS,a.-1 W-t^.-1,1Ld r na+- o2: Rew .
Ev-i at---r ox . 100 p e o p 1 e.,
i
SPOK)SL II7VTR011MN2AL ORDIKlIHGF-
(uAG 137-11-46C, Seccion 11.10.230(1)
D. ENYIROK?iL1fiAL LL7?(LttIS (conclnucd)• ,
• . .vAluetlon For
- ' Agency Uie Only
Approxiu.tely how many pcople vould the complcted project dlmplece'. • _Throe
k. Propoecd oeiaures co evoid or ceduce dieplicement lZpacts, 1! anr: Th e r e s i d e n t s
of the existing mobile home would be displaced, however
that residence will be replaced witn a conventionally-
but-Lt g-i-t7-i d-i S-o---b-C o-i~ c r e a t e d. _ T a-r-e q Cri.1110.r displacement. 1. Ptoposcd neaeures to cnou[e the propoeal it compatible vlth cxistiag and pTO ec[ed Lnd wcs +nd
P1nns, if =nr: ThP Drp,posal is con.sistant wit~ the' Coint)rehensive Land Use Plan, and the existing zoning, thus it
is compatable with projected land uses. This area is in ta-ansif`'iun pezweeri rurdf-m5e5 d aTIsan uses. --Th.c : 3 jected
i n t. h P rrJ,mD.,re hP nc 1 V P P1 a p.
9. NOUSITtG
a. Approximately hov nan7 uniCa vould De ptovided, it any? Indicxte vAecheY h4gh-, aiddle-, or ,
' lov-incom-c howing. ?'J nAZ.r mi d, d ian i t c ~7i.1 1 hP crPated . '
b. Approxim.atcly hov many unica, lE any, vould be e11n1natcdi Indf utc vhe[her high-, alddle-, or '
lov-incoae houning. oT1P t111 cIdLP 7 T1C`OTi1P rCtobi 1 P
home will be replaced by one home of conventional
Po 0~1 ~t r u ~ t i~ n o
C Qro r concrol houiing Smpac[., 1t any:
Nnnp
10. AESTIIE7ICS
A. Nhnc 1s the Cellcet height o( •ny proposed itzuc[urc(j), uoC 1o41uding ance es? w'hec 1,z [he
principal excerior buLlding ~eterlal(e) proposcd? 1 ~ s t o r i e s t o ~L s t o r 1 e s•
consistant with the existing zone. Exterior
material will be primarily wood.
b. (rhac vleve in the lmmcdiace vlcinity vould b-e •itaccd or obstcut[edT
None.
c. Proposed ociaure. Eo raducc or eoncrol .cschecle 1mp.cc., tf .nr:
• TTnnA
11. LIGiIT AND CW.E
A. '.Ihac c7pc of lighc or g L re w111 che propo■al prodvice' :71uc cimc oC dOL7 voJld ic mainly occur?
T4e proposal T.t t r r-eat-P 'L.,i ght- C O risl.s1- a n i-. wi t-
28 new bomes, durina hours consistant with residential development.
D. Could llghc or ; Lre fron the fini.he8 projcct De . ulcty hasard or lotcrfere v1Ch vie w 7
rT„ ; mractQ s,ff Aa czafPtv hazard.
C. V+.r QtT.cinglalt-QGfiOc6 ogT11tk oNg,J@eWoSy•,ifcet rour proposxl? ,
There may be some l.ight from the elementar-y school
north of the site. •
d. Proposcd me..vres to reduee*or eoocrol lisht and gl•re f.npaets, 1[ anr: ' -
N e pee4al m e-, ur o c pr[l Y1 l'1 G p(~ -
. /
SPOf.Ah'L nN'LRONTiEIiTAL ORDINti?ICL '
(vAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.10.230(1) ,
B. LHVIAO?KXXIAL LLLIQKI'S (continucd) Evalua[lon FoT
12. RZCREATIOtI Ilacnty Use Only
tiJh,c deslEnated and infocsul recr u cional opporcunitice are in che immcdlace vicinLcr, .
-4-TC S4'S..-l ~ t-e
sPVPra 1 1 akPC , and a 1so wa 1 lc i n thP Wi 1 c3 7nn.
D. vould the propoeed projccc d1.p L ce aoy cxlscing recrm tional unea? I( ao, deacribe.
AT n iS~1 ~-^~EL-@ nt 9 ~~~-^c ~ 2 ~"~-v-i~'''z c~ ~ • ,
facilities. C. Propoaed ecaeures co reduee or eontrol lmpaeta on reereaeion, ineluding reereaCional oppoCtuni-
tSes to be provided bp the pcojeeC or applltanc, if any:
Nnn A - • .
11. }iIS:OF.IC AtrD CtTLTURAL PRESERVA:ION '
a. Are chere any plaees or'ob]eecs lisced on or propo,ed (or naclonel, a[ate or loeal presecva- '
c!on regiacers knovn co be on or next co the site? II io, generally deserlbe.
Not applicable
b. Gencca117 de■esibe •ny landcurks or cvidenee ot hl,etorie arehneologle a1, .eientl(ie or eulLural
[nportanee 1aiown to be on or nexe to the .iee.
C. Propoeed oeeeurc. co reducc or eontrol impeeca, if any:
not applicable .
14. TTtAIISPOR-ATION
a. idencd[y publit rttee u and rlghvays serving the slte an6 deae[!be propoaed eeCees to the
exiscing ecree[ syscem. Shov--on a1[e plans, Lf an7. T-hP p h as f r o n t acie,_O n '
both 4th. Ave. and LOng Road. There will be extensions
of both 5th. and 6th. aves. eastward from Long roaa. Six lots will taxe access rrom 4Ln ave.
Th%-_ 2 m-i-}-e-s-on aeeP ss-t o
Tnfprci-~~-c Qfl _
b. Is alte currently sct'ved bY publle trinsit' Yf noc, vhac la the appeoxSmate diicanec to the
ourc.c [rsrulc stop'i --iNtc 3-i-t-c y
riSlt.
' ThP u2,aXPCt t- ransi t stop is wi hin %_mi 1 P,
c. flov many parking mpaeao vould the eompleted projeet tuve' }iov matrT vou1Q the project eliatrute'
The proposal would not eliminate any parking spaces; eacn nome wouia nave provYSYOns ror -
3f"{ o i y .
d, uill :eQuirc any nev r wds or atreeCs, or lnprovemenCs to ezisting twdo or screecs
noL Sncluding driveva-y■? IE_so, Lenerally de.ecSbe (lodlcaCc vhether public or prlvste).
Two n_w s r s would be constructed to provide
access to interior lot.s. An added 5 feet would be
dedicated.to both 4th and Long, and those roacis pavec3--tu tffz"e-`c e . • •
e. 51i11 the projeec u.e (or oeeur in the imedl,ee vieiolc7 of) waeer, rall, or air eraoaporeation?
I[ •o, genera117 deseribe. U¢t annl i ~+a}-►1 A . .
9
, .
SPOT.11tY. YTtYZR01111(ZhTAL ORDINJINCL
(uAC 19)-I1-960) Scccion 11.10.230(1) •
' b. Et1YIP.OHKEtt'AL LLEM'NtS (coatioued)
Lvalua[lon For
, . Agencr Uae Only
f. Rov nany vchicula: [rlps per day vould be genetaccd by Cfic cooplctcd proJcct' If kno%,-n,
indlucc vhen puk vou16 occur. The pr'QZpsal WO ] ld g~erate
10 trips per day per residence, for a total ,
, of 270 added trips: Peak hours would be
i n m ofYi"i-TrTs amd e v e n Y'n-gs, y ui
fr-r^v-m-and-v-v w0-r-}~ -
S. Propoeed mcasures to reEuce or concrol tr•nepor[acion Loepect■, i( anr: NA~i r, rsc~i ~ 1 mca cii ro~ prnpnsAra
15. PUBLiC SERVICES
A. Would the project result !n an increaced need for pu511t scYVicce (!or exaaplc, firc protectlon,
pa'_:cc prc:eccion, health carc, schools, ocher)' If'so, gnnecally describn. •
T},~P Y p c 1 j. ~h t j p 1- ~^1 P Yt1 P P d f n r .
Dublic services. However as this proposal is '
consistant with the Comprehensive plan
provisions for those increases in service
!'TTVe JJ C C I • pi:-&n • ,
E. Propoeed meeeuzea to rcduce or control direcc :mpetts on public s.rvicei, eny: pTo sxLeci&l measures to miticrate the minor impacts
. . invol-ved.
lb. U'ILI:IES
s. Ctrclc u[111[!es turcenclY avalla Dle •C the sltc: clactrlciCy, ne[ural gaa, vacer, refuse
scc'vice, Celephone, eaoStery ievcr, sepCit nystca, o[hei.
b. Deecrlbc the uEilitlea thnt arc propoacd Cor thc pro}ec[, the utllity providing the scrvice end •
the oencral conscrvcclon atcivtcles on Lhc altc or 1n the loDediAtc Yiclnl[y vh.[ch c.isht bc
nc e d ed . W-, i 'rr~i . i-s-D . _ f ~m W^. T .p ' ~ Iz fx-0 TIl
TAUAp., tP1pDY1P from PNWB: drv lines sewers will .
be coonstructed., on-site systems used on an interim basis.
C. SIGMATlJRL
. ,
I, che undcr,igned, w u r undcr the perulty ot perjury cheC the above response. are made truth:ully •nd to cTu beac o( ay knovJ,edge. I a130
, undecsund Chat, should there De any vlllful mlarepresent.tlon or vlllful L ek of (ull dlselo.utc on my paee, the ±Aeney aay vl[hdrav any
deteroln.eion o[ non.ignltieanee chat !t niaht i.aue !n reli.nee upon ehli eheekliae.
o=«: Fehruary 1-1, 1992 propooeot Theron Hitchcock .
t l ' (Please Prin[ or 'Cypc) - '
/
Proponenc : Add ree, 0 4"3lrJ,1 ~
(Slgnature) Phone: - ~9 2 4 ? 3 7'7 Washinaton 99216
Pcrion eomplctinE (orm: Dete: ~l13 / ~{Z
Phonc: 926 1 F) 61 t ~
TOR STAPP OSL ONLT
Sta(f mcmber(s) revleving cheekllsc:
b.icd on chis ataff rcvlcv of the envl[onmcn[al eheekllec anE othet pc[tlncnC in[ormatlon, tTu iC&[L:
A. ~ Concludc, tluc Chcre ace no pzoDable'slaoifieant adverae 1.ap•eca and reeomueodi a determinAtion of nonsi;oifleanee.
b. ~ Coacludcs thac p[oDaDlc slSni(icant adverse enrlronmental lapacts do ezleC (oT Cl+e cuttcnt propoaal and reeoamends a altisa[ed deCer-
nlaacton of nonsl6atfleaeee Yich eondl[iona.
C. Goncludee thac cherc arc proD+Dle s1Snlfie.oc Adverec eevironmenc,1 Lepaecs aed reeommends a dcCCn.iua[ioe of alenl(lunee.
TILT1iC P= - 175.00
r
f .
. PE ml651=gz
Wl- , .
• ~ ti~~ •
~
K ! .
~.J ! ~ ..3 1. fi " j
m 0
. ~ ,
_ • ~PO''~
!z ~ -~.J~' - • ~ `
TST OFFI ~ ' . .
M *I N = V) ~ CJ . ~ , ~ ~ ~ C • AL Y ~ d
. i • . ~ ~ `ILON
. ~~C Y'r,~! . `
ool
` '
~ • EL.pD49. Q ~ .
. ~ . ~ . . o ' . .
C N Q Z ~ ~ 1ST .
< ~J
~ ' f+ L ZNO . Q~ SE;ON p ~
~ L Z ndAv - Q .
t 3 4 D • ~ F`'• ~ r , (Y N
.rURT 1 V v ~ M FOURTH /
a rd .4 YE. ;.::`•?~::•:~:r • 1~!~1. _ f!~rw
z. • ; -
^t , • '
1 ~ ~ . . . . . , . - s •
' • 1 '(f:r•l~}.~'J.~::l~... . .
v~ r }y,r >;ti•i ~
± J. F1 ~ N N .4v,{:~.; .rv: i}i{ rt}~
~ ' y . >}rr ...~.,y~:;:::.: , r . ■
• ~ t : Q ?:~;~?6~•'.~.;~, r: Y:~~.ti;.
1 , i Ln . .
( : S.•...... ' ~
~ • • • ' •
~ I tD .
eT14 a:vE. IGHTH ~ • ~ .
Av E
. . ~ ~
~ . co
cn -
~ . ~ . o 0
t
X
,
. . to
. .
. a
otL
r . ~ \
• - lD ~
. -L .
~
. . .
i ~
rKLLIhuNAxY VLA,r or
Hl"CHCOCK'S IST ADDITION . ~
A NE1/4, SCC.19-25-45
4'b Av E. , . .
o ~ ~ •
f„c
~H10/AIT ~ •
zo tiu ru., ucc iob to¢ 104 io4 i04
o~ 81-0~ 5C7 13t1.w l.fiiE ~ Ru% oco« uo~~ oCfcAIrtiaw ,
1 le 0)2 Lst~ 1~n0 1•1 GotEln aE01to^ ta Ofr•n+Crr. i•[~~d~C In Goo1
' l ` _ ~ ' ~ . '1• .I Pl.,., p.p~ 10 1• JO~~.n~ v..hIn1t...
Q
_ _'~J~ _ ~ C 3 9•, ~ ~J •
i ,
~ Iso4e.. Gcttvro1_ t
Sur~c j.wK~ ` ~
.._ts I oa,,,Nr c~o g~oGK . ~ .
l,5..~ •
. reo►ailo urt~ r~nt1. t••lir
, rv"ue or Lori> ,
r~~.•~ f-~A`~1 I'.1 tir. wr iti[t ~o.aao la. /t.
1 c[iir. tOrci u~ 1.3
~ j U_ C+_ ~ ~ a .AttR; vve1:r
~ 12 I I 1 O~ 9 j fj 7 conv. vu30 w►..
rA1Tt# I.ptIt .n0 Ct.ln IIi11
N 5k~ AVE. STErnP,Cu1.-OE•SA f~ Tb to•KwE
Fxcc Wev Nv+Y 90
O
55' B~o4 5cf ~AcK~ • ,
~ p i
f1 ao
0 BLOGK C < ~ d'.`
I 1 i
J I (y J_J%~4A~fl
o 5CL E i'•5o' vicIuITY Mav
q 8 7
0 1 I 10 55 ct,. ivT 91k cK
Y
• TEMP. Cut,-Dc•Sk C.
o L!~ AvE. ° ~r "
Dr ' .
~t tA~ f~pe<~l 01 iA•~On MllfAeect
in IeE. I!)1
gg~gL cyScrBuK J P
~ I 2 3 7SO¢3
BLoCK
104 104 104 10¢
Z O ' I l 1 O 104
QorE: OuLY TuE HoufG AT E 1 8o0z To RcMKI N,
AL► OTNCR 5T4uCYuREt To $EREMOVto, • . ' •
1OGLupIUy RESIDENSE AT E.V190(o . ,vR~7,_H[]RN a rNC_ • a.7 ox x asCOr+o nvrc• . .
sssiz ' •
~309f 936-5 939
Joe'~b25o1 ' .
y "t N
` i -•.1 ~ * ~ ~ -d ~ Y
~Pr'~'~.+.'U'. ~ ~;~r -r `d:^ ':k „ ) •r~ s'w!~4f, .f` ~.5~ ~~wa~r~;~y~ ' •
~ T]L.~~~~MI~: ,1 ~ S ,1 ~~V•J• -T~;~ ; . ~v-- l~. • L
•'l • ~ir i • ~ ~ ^ ~ r. ' ~:.~1~ • ♦ ~~:i 7 ~ ~ ~ ' ~
I~
. r~ ~ ot• '~°i :'£'l: Y~.~ r ~ ..f, ~ ~ "<'ii ~ ' ' ~r, . . ~'y~ + ' ~ o ' c g,
~ q t~~fr • 's: ♦ ~t a ~Nt.. "s • ~ . ' ' f/'•. ' , ~ ' i
'~''.FL}~,~~ ,..t,~ ;.~4~~~, ~ } ,J '
•-i: • • %a::~''~v.. , . . ~iiy' ~ ~r~7t .C,~S '~.~.K- ! / i ' L/r• ~ ~~.Y . 1` j~~~ i • •
~ . r . ~f^ • , . h ~ 7 . ~ . r t{, .L , t" S.j' P~Y f„ .d .i' . • i .L . ' '
~ : ~ : ~Yi ,4 \~w ' ,'C.;~ ~ pN . , ,s ~~~~r~• ' ~ r . j . y F, -.:5~ . ~ , . ~ ,
t ~ ,i,.. ! ti•~k S \ tir `L'^ ' 6., 't "t;' ~ ,~w:
~ i ~1--3 : ~ ~ ~,`~0 2 i< < ~ .f~,,..~r~. t ' ~ .
~ ~\'tG~ ~ 4, ';i -".i 't f ^T;3';,~'gd ~si~ ~ e- J • ~'~"f i i } 'V~'
~`j ~Wl':A:~O~~~ y~ ' •''S-'~ w'~r.~ }~:~rT~~/ .at`;~°i~{'"•~-';/.►.~ O~y/,~'~~• . :J,.~- ~ ,i :
~t i~ ~1 ~ ~ r,F. , ~ , ~ t+-. 1~.~- .c . ' • ~ ~ ~ ' ` -'S; . or .
V ; .(L:~. G-~ 7`~~ ..+.1, ~ ;'~l~.,i ~ ~ ~ ,y~A :i~'~':° 'i''}d;,•~i~`~° " ! .~J.it '1~•• , . - ~ , •:s .
1 p J ~ 2' ~ ~ Y~ ' • • ,j i • I • ~ tl w : i : - . ,7 .t' i•• . . .
~ '~i r,L::aG 1,~3 \ 0(~~ - 9 ~1: ~ D-- p~` 1 •.Y'.~':t. . ~v: ;w 4d._••:`.. 4 .
~ • ~ v ~ f ~ , ~A ` V ~t: ~ " y ~ ~ . tiV . ~ ~i}: ~l V ~ r ~~t ~~•i'•~wq . .1: + . .
~ r) ~ ~ ~ " \ ~ • ' . • A _ ~1 ' ~ • ~¢i~.. ~ ~ ' c',! ~ ' ~ • , ' i ~
~{,i~.f~ ~ 1 ' ~ 11 •~~1• . . . .4 . , •:i; ~.:~~,Q . .-t .R..~~ I ~~~•':i. . ~ •r~ 1 .
~ • . . ' • ~.I~~• T• ' F . e 1 • • ,{;`.'..r,cti•,l`. . ~ :?:la • ,l~ / - .
: ;R1~ ; ` b ~~47'-~b f5PF,
~.r''~f 1- ~ ~•t 4
1 ~ ~~~,t . _;~"-r-: ~L _ a ' . L M_r. ' L, ' ' ~ • . . T • .
~ Z' ~ . f 7`j,a}/~' j, _ • : ' - . • ~ • ~ . t ~ • ~
. . /~t~ , ~ , ' ',•1.L.. y ~ • 'y'~I: ,i6 • " :
t 0~ y" ~~w- G. F J~ A 1 ~ .S.' r ~~O ~,~1i~ ' {w ! ~ •i " L ,•M 13r~ ~
a 7Z•O- t ~ i'3' . tr' - 4; •'-~r 2 ~ ~~Q ~If.~~~ : ..g' :t ~ _ ~ t'; . ~
- r''~4 . ' ; 3 _ • , r . t' / ~f l} . , , z ' ' i' 3, ~T •
i ' ~~k ~ ` r , : .v ..~A • 1' • ~ . .a~ ' ~ • • ~ ~ y~ •r'~. i.r~~ ' _ v Z'
~ ~ N'1 ~ •~~~'.1: • ~ ~'t ~ ` • . n: ~ ~ •~,.t 1 . . fy~a~~ ~t. : 1
• ' r ' ~ -4): • ~ ~ ac~"' 4* b.::~ ,z~t2,; , { . ~ . • , i ~S . . ' . ~
IL i .
~ • ' i ' • a~ . . , ~Q , ~ ~ Q j 4~%'~. ° ' • ,
, , - . ~ S ~ t ' ~i';.~., ;:3't ~ ► . ` . • • : t':= i. t , ~1 2 ` • ()D i • Z.
• . C ~ ~ ' . Z' ~ F"_~',s:~ ``6 ,''~1 ` 1{'Oi~- • ~v ~y, t'• v • , ' •:r y y ~ ~ .
I - f ' ' ; ::t~ _ ~..1 ~ • ~ a : . . .1 _r 1± 3' ~ . .
- ~ . D~ t ' • ' . .~y?':~',;' . G°`~~ia~ _ • ~ . ~ . . 3 ~--z
~ ~r ( . `1 ,t~ ~ r :it~:r ` ' ~ i •,j10• ' . • C~tS `7 ~ W '
.L ~ . 1 ✓ ~r .f u `f t , ~ , .t ~ ~ t 2 : s ' ♦ . JL .
_ ~ ` . ; : . 7 . '~h. . . : ~ , . r ,r: ~ ~r o. ~ i h
1~.. • ~ . { . s ~ ' . ~t,~~21 t1' '5~" . . . _ ~ . I~..~ ~ ~ ~ ,R' ~ ~ ~ .
r ~ , ~ ' ~ $ • ~ , . • ' -.L.afi~
C
y
y} '~~.R. ~ I..~c~ ' . . . ' G' lrc:qpti~~QT~+c~ ~ ~ . _ 7~~ • 4 'a IQ t i _
__~1~ - . - ~ , • . . f t
Z x , i:. . Z-. `"r I , . . ~ z ~
Av
` ~ N , • : . :nc.•, E
9 ~ • • . ; , ~ ~ ~ iry: ~ f: ' ' .I• : ) ~ •L'•~ i 1 iA~
i ~ a • • ~ ACF~ tS ELETW. - ~ :'t•. ^ _
GREEN
~ . I ' , . . f:~'! ~ . . . . . , ~ , ~ .
~ !4 1•3• -1,2 II ~ z , t , •~;.1;;, s .,.•.t,•;. . ~ ' ~ ~ . . ~ ~r~ 3 . •a i~~ 1 : ~E~ ~::-~'fi•
~ i ~ i , , . < ~ J=,; . . • ~ ~EF
j zo ~ • ( . , , ~ ..r• . . . , . : .'t ~ ~ ' ~ "ti~ r'Y` ; r. ~ .
y • r • a i . ~ : ~ to ~ . . . ' ' ! . • ~ , . . ~ ~ .
~ . : , c~" ~.;~z h, ;
_ ~ _ ~ Q j. ..ti r~ • i : • : •i' i• : • .6 i• ~ , f;, ~ lr:
,0 . ' ~ : : . i • . • ~ 2~. ~ i... . . ~•4"'~ . .
. ~ " 1 ( . N • . . i.... • , . . . • , . ~h , i ~
G.
- • . ' ' . ' ~ •FUURTFt ~ ' ~ t - -
ro ~ " ~ ~ . . ~ . . ~ • ~ ~ ~
-3 - 4 0
3 2
L/
/yV . • ~ f ~ ( . .
~r~ ~ ~ 7 ' 1
1.1- • • . i • (
4 '3 2 I ~ . . e ; • f . 7 . , ~ i 5 ' j
~ ~ ~ . ' • . ~q . . ' _ ' ~ . .
11 12/ ~ L , • ;A' . . , ~ .Z , , ~ . ~ ~ .
10~~ ~r13 i u . " . . ~ 0
%
X1' C%
_ P . . - - r- C-'$
18
19 S I X+.' t-{ v' E:; e 21 I- 5,01 ZO ZI ; 3o
~S~` 63 ' ' • ~
~~r~ R r - ' ~ . . ~ p . ~ . ~ , .
. ' ~ j ~ ' ; d ~ ~ : d ~ . I ~ , ~ ~ - ~ - °
'~"``"'4r-a~ : ~'~J E P.. ' }r ' ~f • . • ; o0 9f . . ~',e ~ • 10 . ~ ~ . • ~ 2 ' ~ 3
~ . ' _ { ~ --C f , ' . 4 2 g~~ , ` • ~ t' - -
' i s ~ ` ; = : ~'1•--~; t~ 1, • - a : . • ' .
~ " ~Gr 1. O D , ~ ~ • t - t 'Nry . ~l~ w 20~~ ~`~f+,2OS8,~' 90•..__~_..
GG7.1S~ ~ ~ ~Lo7• ~_~~.-ar.~~.y..~^..~~__'_ . . _ .rsr -
.-13 3,4.3U - -
• • • ~z~~ . .
r , I •.i . , . . ~ ' , , ` - • . . . ` , •
• ~ 1 , • ♦i~ j . • _ ~ •
• ~ . i~~ ' .
, ~ . ~ ~ ~I ` . ' • ,T • , ' ' ~ • • ` • , '
. . • . a . " - C~ . . ' • • . `V ~ , • ~ •
' ~ r 'f:~ • . ~ • i ~ . ~ • , . . Y ' , • ~ r, ~ • , •
" -jY • . ` ~ ,K . ' .•f . • . , r ~ . . . '
, , i• : ; . • , ` .t : . ' , .Z , • . _ . . . • .rk•. • : _ f '
• , J ' ,y.• ` , . - " • ~ • ' I • . • ~ • • • ` f• ~ . , • ` . .
~ • • , • . .f ,t. ~ i 4w . ~ ' • ' • ~ ~ • .
• ~ ♦ . . ~ ~ ~i~1j' • il r- : . • + O ~ ~
. . . . . . . . , . . . . . ~ : a.~.~ ~ . . .
. , :t.. ~q . . . .
. • - .1. : . E,;_ • F,, • ~ , ~ ~ , . , . . • y .
• ,C'+i ~i~• ~t . .i:p~ . . ~ . i . . . . ,
- • . . ' _ ~ ~ ; ' ~ .
.
v OFFI CE oF TNE CDl.Jh1TY r-_NGi iuEER
SI'Ok::ANF COUhI"I"Y y WASHT NGTQN
,
Apr i l I,
"I"Q„ SpoE,ane C-Dunty Planninq Departmer7t (Ci_irrent Planniilq
Administrator)
FIRC]Ma SPok2ne CountY -
Enqineers Department Q~ ~SUBJu Subdivision Conditic-i-ia, NamL Hitct~~c~~cs_~nd_P►ddo ~Ii_~mber PE^1651 -92~ ~ rea Subciivisions
Tfie fo1 lawinq~"ConrJitions rif Appraval " for the above referenced
si_ibdivision are submitted t-D the Sp-::-E;ane C-Di_tnty Hearinq Examiner
Committee for inclLtsion in the "Planninq Report" and "Findinqs
and f7rder" for the hearinq 5cheduled Rpril 23, 199::e
E 1 TI-ie conditional approval of the plat is qiven by the County
Engineer sub.jnct to dedicatic-n of riqht-of-way and approval
of the r-DCzci system as indi cated in ttie prel iminary plat of
record n
EThat plans, prt--jfiiles and cross sections as clesiqned t-_)
C-^-unty stai7dards showinq proposed street centerl. ine and cLtrb
qrades be slibmitted t---l the C-Dunty Enqineef- f-Dr approval
prior to constructic--n and/or ttie fi 1 inq of a fii-ia1 pl.at;
rc-lad plans tc- be prepared under ttie direction ofi a licerisPd
Professional Civil Enqii-ieer.
F23 That drainaqe plans arad desiqn cal ci_Rlati-Dns Sr►c,Winq tr~e
a1 ignmenf: of drainaqe faci I ities be si_tbmitted to ti-ie Cc-l_tnty
Einqi.neer f-Dr apprc-oval pr-ior tc- coristiri_tctic-n and/or the
filinq of the fir-ia1 pl.at. DrainaAe pl.ans to be prep~.~red
lAncler thE direr_ti.r-In ._.fi a licenseci F'rc-fessional Ci.vil
Lnqineer..
F 5 Lr--onstruction within th•ie pr-Dposed publ.ic streets and
easements shai i be performed i_ti-ider ttie direct supervision -_--f
a licensed engineer/surveyor, wh-D si-,all fijrnish the C-Dunty
Enqineer with "As Buil.t" plans and a certificate in writing
that all improvementa were install.ed to the lines anr.l qrades
sh-.-jwn ---In ti-te approvcd cc-nstri_ictic-n plans and tI-iat al l
rJisti_trbed m-DriLtments t•iave been replacecJ.
~
«
p a C:I e
E NCI cri11 st Y' i_l C t: .TL ofi W oY k 1. s 1:, r-I t] e pCw' 1'' f o'r' m ( ' c~ w F~ .i ri l'1 G~ C~-' : .1. ~i 1; :1. I-i
~..j rpr c~ ~:icy eci F' t~ 1 i c Ri q fi: r.~-f- W . y~_t r-~ i: a. a F..~ e~" fT11.t I-1~~ s bFs ca n
i~suGd by the Gounty Eng:ineera Al.l worl:: is ai_tb.ject tc-,
insFaection Gind appr cnval by the Cc-unty Encineer.
E 7 A 1l cons t ruc t ion w i t hin i; I-ie exi-sti n q c-r propcise d f' i_tb 1 i c
F Z i ght-of- Way is t,,- b E com p 1 e t ed pr a. or t r z - fi]. i. n q t hefi na 1
plat c-r a bc-nd in the amount estimated by thP Coi_tnty
Enqirieer to cover the cc-st of constr•ucticin c-f improvements. .
C-Dfl StYuCt1c-i"l c e r t i fi i cat ion 9 "AS 1_t 1 1 t" (Jla11 S afl Cj fTl ofl i_tm e nti n a
the street centerlines shall be filed withi the Gounty
Eriqineer. •
E 1'1 That apprc-pr iate prc-v isic-n be macie t hat t he fo1 1owi nq
described property be held in trust until the contiiiLiation
c-f -the streets be dedicaterJ or deeded: A 1 ft. strip at tfie
encis or edqes of al 1 streets that terminate or border tfie
plat boi_tndaryo (Tempc-rary cul de sacs are reqi_iired when
streets termin2te at tl°,e plat bc-i_tndariesn )
E122 The applicant sr~~~,uld be acivised tf-iat iridividLtal driveway
access permits ar e req+_tired prior to iss+_ianc_e of a bi_ti ldinq
permit for driveway appriDache5 to i:rie C.-Junty r-Dacl systemo
C]. ^ Ded i cat ionof;_ fe: e t of a dci i t ic~ nal. R:i q F~it-c-f- W a y ~.=k1--_-nU
Four th AvenLte„ r T
F 1 a' L)edicata.on c-f i eet -Df aidciiticinal Rigt-~t -z-If Way alonq L.2-2g
Roac:i.
E:16 E.xisting Cc-i_tnty r~~.acls pr,_'IvirJinq direct. F:xc_c~.~ss to the plat
shal.l be paved andl---.r cl_trbed to_, SpOk:ane Ci--,+_lnty atand~.~rdso
E17 Th-it a:L 1pl_tb1i~ roads witl-ia.n the plat be ciesiqnecl anc1
constructed to Spcokane C~~-unty standards.
E19 The word "aPpY i c ant" sriai l inc 1 i_ide tr~e clwrier or owners cof
tf'Ie F]1''ii(>(?Ytyy, h1.5 1'iL-31Ysy c._~ssl.gfl.~"-~ at1Cj Si..lCCe55oY5.
E:~3 The Gounty =nciif-ieer has desiqriated Typical R-Dadway Secti.on
Number Tw-:,,,_L-DGal`ACCE'S5 si:andard f-Dr tFie imprc-vement ofi al 1
iiitLrnal.~streets which is to--- be c.-nnstruci;ed within the
pr-Dposed^develc-pment. 7'rtis wil l rEyui.re ti-ie inatal latic-n
36 f t a of a spha 1 t. T he r_ -Dn s t ruc t ion~~~ ~cLtr b i n g i s a J. so
reqijiredo
~
~
Pr.~gL-- aa
F
E,12A. Ti-,e Cot.Anty Enqin~~r has desa.gnateci Typical Ro~.~dway Sectioi-I
hlumher Tw3D,_Lo-Dca]._Accez~ staiidard foY~ the impttovement of
~1:,9g_R~~ad wr~~.c:ti is ar~.~acert~t t~_. t~~e pif~~~-p~:-~~~c~ ci~~r~~.~~prr~~nt~
This wil l requi.r~~ the ~tdd7i.tion ~~f appr=v1:f.imate7.y 2=11 ft. oDf -
~~phalt alonQ the frc-ntagp- P_ff the deve].wW{pment 4 T~~~~
cor~struction ot ci_krb~~ig ancJ sidewaXk x~ al5{W; tireqi-tiredo
E:24 Ti~~~ County Engineer- has degiqnated T}rpicaZ R#Wfadway Becti{M-n . ,
hlumber 7w-:).L_Lq.~~al,_Ace~~~ ~~~ndar+d f~~~r the i,mpr-OV2ment c-f _
Fc-l_tr-th Avenu« which is ad,~acen~ to the proposed
~evelopmenta~ This wi.ll require tYte Addita.on of
appriD;r,a.mate~~ ID~feet_from centerline of aspI-ialt along the
fyc-ntaqe of the deve3.opmente TI-je~construction iDf curbing
an~ sidewall.. Y s a]. so ~ ~ quired.
E32 Th:e proposed plat shalI be improved tu the standards set
fc-rth ir~ ~pokane Count}r ~~oard cif Cosnmissioners Res~.~lLttYon
Noe 80-1592Y as amendedp which establishes reg+_4lation5 for
rcia1s, aPi~roar-hesg dra.i_nas~e and fees ir~ ~~ew ~o.-instru~tion~
~3 I'D Th~ County Enqir~~~r has examined tr,.i..s development pt~~~~pc~sal
and has cietermined tti~.~t ~~~e J-mpact of tYiis pr-r~posal a.ip~n the
e:r;istina Cc-i_tnty R-Dad Systetr~ wz-Arrants the dedicati~~~n of
addY.ticinal Rigl~t of Way -artd tt~~~ roadw~ty impr civements her~ein
5pecifiedn
E90 The appli.cant shoulcR be ac€vised that there may ef.ist
ijti lit ai, e 5 eith ~ r und erQr ound +ma r overhead affect in g t he
applicants propertyt including prope~ty t~~ bt-_ decli'cat~~
~~~t aside fc-r future t~~qu~sition~ ~pok:ane County will
U(5€5 }_l fTl t_-2 I-1 c. f inafl C it. l obl:d. gat:L on for adjustff1 eI"1 ~ s o1" lt el+:.~ ~ at1 oI"1
~,eq~~rdir~~ these The applicant shou1d c!-pecl.:: wit1-,
the z).pp~~cable #.Atilities arici Spf~kane Co{anty Enqicieer tc.
cf~~~erm.zne whether tY~~ ~7~ppli~_Ant --}r U~Il~ty iS res~DOi~sible
fi--rr^ adjuGitfTl@nt cii`' Y"~locs:ltiof1 Crists afl~ tc+ f}1ak.e a1A1'af`1qe#netlfi,~
fc-1`' dny necessa1'y Wolr kw
~ ec.1. e.?. ~ Cond'~ tioR 5 0 . ,
Bot~~ 5th and Gth Avenfae sha:I. 1 continue tc, the e~tcftern ed~e ofi
the 13rc,~~os-er.i plai,, with a 1, focit dedicatic-in at the e~.~stern
ter rrii ni_c5.. CiAl-de-sac d~~~~~~ ~nd ~~dication sh-nuld reflect this
r ontz. n+_q at; i on ci~~th and Gth Av e ni_s e
! •
1 `
~
- ~S"~` .r. •.~r " , .
~
. . ~ ~ Y
~
SE4 ^ ~j j , l'~" E7N ■ + ~
\ J ~
ION
V CT
i ~
.
r
SPOKAtiF ENYIROHTiEKTAL ORDIHANCE
(1tNC 1)7-11,96J) Section 11.10.230(1) . .
Envlronmentel Chetkltst
Ftle No. '
' Purpose of Checkllzt:
The Stett Enviro rnr►ental Po11cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RC11, requires ell goverrmentel aqenctes to consl6er che environmental iiapatcs of a proposal
before n►akinq deCisions. An Environae-ntal lmpatL StatemenL (ElS) must be prepared for all proposals .rt[h proDable signtficant adverse inpactz on
the quallty of the envlrorxntnc. The purpose ot :his checklist is to provlde info nnatton to help you and the agency identi(y impacts (ron your
proposal (and to reduce or avoid impat:s from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help Che,a9ency deetde vhether an E(S 1s required.
Instructions for Applicants: .
This envirorn.ental eheckllst asks you to describe sone basic informa[1on eCou: your propozal. Gorernmental agencies use this chetklist to Getern+lne
whether the environmentel impacts of your proposal are siqnifitant, rcqulrlnS preperation of an E15. Ansuer ihe questions Driefly, with the most
preeise Snforroation kn arn, or qlve the b-:t Gtscription you tan.
Tou muzt answer eaeh question eccuratc:, ;,.G to Lhe best o( your kno•+le6ge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions
froa your own observations or project plans uitl►wt the need to hfre expertz. (f you really do not know the answer, or 1i a question does not apDlY
to your proposal, write 'do not kn rn+' or 'does not apply.' Complete nnsweri co the questlons now may avotG unnecessary delays later.
Sor.-- questions ask about governmental-requlations, such as zoning, shoreiinc, and landmark des(qnations. Ans-.r these Questlons If you tan. If you
have probleros, the 9overrmtneel ayencies can assist you.
The checklist questions appl) Co all parts of your proposal, even if you p1ar. to do thein over a period of time or on different parcels of land.
Attaeh any additiona) In(ormation that vlll Cescribe yovr proposal or 1ts en•:ironmrnta) effects. ihe egency eo vnlth you submit thls checkllsi rr-ay
ask you to explain your answtrs or providt edditional infonnaiton reosonably r:lated Co dete m ining {f there nay bt s1yn1(itent adverse impatt.
Use of eheckllst for nonproject proposals: .
Cpnplete thfs checklist for nonproject proposals, even thou9h qucstians may Ce answered 'does not avply'.
IN AOOiTIOH, eaaplett the SUPPIEMEKTAL SKEET FOR KO!IPROJECT ACTIO4S(Part D).
For nonpro}eet a~tions, the re(erentes in the CheCk,list ;o the wrds 'prOjec:,' '~pplltanC,' enC 'pro~erty or Site" snould be read as 'proposal,'
'proposer,' and a(fected 9eographic are=,' respetctvely.
A. BACKGP,OUND
1. :laroe of proposed projecc, if apolictDte: H1tCY1COCk ~ S Seeond Addition
z. 4ame or Appltcant: Theron Hitchcock •
3. Addre.s and phone nvnbe- ,r appl,c"., o: co„tacc p:rson: E. 13310 13th. Ave. ; Spokane, Washington 992
( Art,Noll; E. 13423 32nd. Ave.; Spokane, Washington 99216) 4. Date checklist prepared: F e b.r U a r y 10, 1992
5. Agency requestinej chec};li.;; Spokane County Planning Department
6. Proposed timinQ or scheduie (inCluEing phasing, 1f dpplicable): P r e 1 i m i n a r y p 1 a t a p p 1 i e a t i o n 2- 1 4- 9 2;
Preliminary Plat Hearing April 1992; Final Plat approval and recording
August/September 1992; Build out and sales complete Spring 19-93.
7. a. Oo you have any plans for (uturc addittons, expenston, or (urther eCtfvity related to or corxnected v1tA this proposal? If yes, explaln.
The sponsor has no present plans for any expansions or future
activity in this area.
b. Oo you own or have optlons on lend nesrby or ad}acent to thls proposal? tf yes, eXQli,n. The SpOI1SOr CIOeS I10t 0w11 T10I
have any options on any property adjacent to or near this porposal.
8. list any enrironar_ntal in(ormatlon you knov aDout that has been prepared, ar xill be prepared, dlrectly reiated to this proposal.
No special enviromental.information-has been prepared with respect
to this proposal. Rev.z/1/88 ' 1
spozAlrr. LNVI20hTtENLAL ORDINAttCZ
(vAC 19)-L1-960) Seccion ll.10.210(1) • . '
A. hAC7CGY0V:iDf(cootloued) •
9. Do rou imov vhccrcr appllu tloaa .ce pending (o[ govcrnmcntal appcovals of ochcr propo u 1. dlreccly atfeccloa the propcrcr covered by rour
propo.al.' I[ res, cxpl.lo. •
The sDonsor is not aware of anv other nronosals that are Dendinq that relate to this project.
10. 1.1sc any govtrnmenc •pprovals oc pecmlta chac will be needcd foi rov: pCOposal, lf limo.n. PrP 1 i m i n a ry p lat' approva ~Final Plat approval, approval of the water plan, approval of the
road plans and drainage plans by Spokane County; building permits;
approval ot ary-line sewer pians; septic tanx permits rrom
rI-~~th-H-z-s-t .
1l. Clve a Dcie[, eooplete Jeeertptlon of-yw r proposnl, ineludlns the p:3yoeed usee and the sl:c oC the projeet end sice. :Tere are eeveral
qLU!ncloes L eer ln ehls eheekllsc chac a3k 7ou co deaerlbe ecrtein si;~eece of your propo.al. Yov do not oeed co reput chose anxvers on thla
PaBe• T-h„P pYCIp(1sa 1 LC
f axLd-_J.,o n g
Road. It is a portion of the NEa of Section 19; Townshio 25; Ranae 45.
The proposal is to divide 8.82 acres into 29 lots for single family homes.
Typical Yot size is 10,40U sq. feet. There is an existing home and mobile
a'iO71tJ--wTt!zoevei:cit ~ , dtt--bMt--t-h-~_- hOTYT_- t-0
--bj 2'-r-t,$ _ T-h-e ° it@ iS do i r. ra a o r7 ~ S v1 v-1-Nn- n-Ll~ r fh-'°
Comprehensive land use Plan and is currently zoned Urban residential 3.5.
The site is directly south of an existing elementary-school, and is surro.undE
by simular UR 3.5 zoned roerties. .
t.oeitloa of [he propoeal. Glve w!(ltlent tn(o:z tlon or a pet.on :o underec.nd the pretl.c loce;ton of your propvecc ;;oJcec, lnclud.nr a
serce: .ddree., 1f any, and acetlor., ;o-nehtp AnC range, Lt Y.nev:. i( a propo u2 vould oe.ur over a tan6e of arei, ~r~v,de :he cange or
:+oun"a:lea af the a1[e(a). PCOv1Ae • lcgal deserlpCton, stCC plan, vtclnlcj aaa, atiC :opograp::it map, :f ceuonabtr eva::.sble w'h'.:e you
aho.,le 3ubult any plane :cqu.lced br c JO~~X_ yea`s`tno:corner dOupiieaj~et~ep. °aric#A5h~~1CJ. • 1~~aQu ZlI1 ~I1~ccIDj,~pVK
~~_lan`e n
relaLcd co this checkllat. Il 4 ll J
Valley( Greenacres). A portion of the NE*4 of Section 19; Township 25; Range
4-') E .W.M..
_T,ega~ Iv dP_,qcribe_d__a-, Loty7 &__8_pf rn~hin kdditdon_t_o r,_r_e_enacres__as ner
plat thereof recorded in Book "S" of Plats, page 30; situate in the ~
County of Spokane, State of Washington. Commonly known as E. 18002
lJ. Doef the p[opo+ed at[lon ilc w:thin [he Apu_Sfef $tralClvt At'te (.k5.\): 'he Gene al Scve:, Syc.cvlec !.Fee.' :fiS P~io;,!C/ ~~c, y"~erv e{,, A[ea` -iie
CLCy of Spo~oc? (Scc: Spolcutc CounCy'• ASA Ovtrley Zonn ACLee for bound~clca~. T~e SZ l.e l les ~'Jlt~ln S.J0tll ~lle
A.S.A. and the P.S.S.A..
:'0 S C C01CP=LD b T APPL I CANL
S. Y1fVIROR`LrN".JIL CI.IIiKN'i5 .
EvAluatton fo[
Agencr Usc Only
l. £AR-11 •
a. Gcncral deoerlpeion of Che slte (eirelc one): (LA[, rolling, htlly, steep slopes, oountelnous,
ocner:--T-hp- h-ag. ~ l.-on ri r, A r; n d
of time and is verv flat.
b. 'IhaC ts [he nceeput elope on [ht slcc (app-oxlnetc pereenC slope)1 ~p -q 'q {'han ~0/
c. '/ha[ geoc u 1 C)pes oC solle arc Cound on the sice ((or examylc, clay, saad, g[avel, ,x aC, MuCL)?
' I( you lcnov the claul(luClon oI sgcleul.Cu[al solls, speU(r thca •nd noCe •ny p[la' Caztilend.
The soils are characterized as GgA (Garrison gravelly loam)by the soil survey from the U.S.
D ~ u-f A gr-i-Ccz'1 tur-e .
d. Are Lhere sur(aee SodleacSoeu or h1sto ry of una Cable sol~s io Q%e teimrdlace vttlnS.y? I: ao,
de .«1b~ . There are no surface indications of any
unstable soils in the area.
~
IuAC 191-f1-960) Section 11.10.230(1) SPOKANE EHYIROKMENTAL ORDINAKCE
B. EHYIRO`MEMTAL ELEHENTS(continued) ;valuation For
Agency Use Only
e. Describe the purpose, typc, and approximate quantities ot any fillinq or grading proposed.
! n d i c a t e s ou r c e o f f i l t. ~e i n r-N 0 Spd f ar ~ e
the site. There will be some qradina of the road
to provide for drainage and also for 11208" swales.
f. Could erozton o a ur as a resulc of clearin9, constFuttion. or use? If so, generally descrlbe. -
The site is very flat and does not lend itself to
erosion problems. The soils have moaerate to very
rapid petmeapiliLy.
.
9. About what pertent o( the sfte x111 be covered with impervlous surfaces f er proj,g ct cQnstruc-
tton (for exanple, asphalt or buSldings)? A p p r o x i m a t e 1 y O t t I1 2
site will be covered with impervious surfaces and/or
homes.
h. ProposeC measures Co reduce or control eroston, or other lmpatts to the earth, 1f eny:
As the s-ite does not lend itseld to erosion, no
special measures should be required. The site will
utilize 11208" swales for surface water arainage.
2. AIR
a. What type of emissions to the a1r would result fran ihe proposal (1.e., dust, auconobiie, odors
industrial, Nood smke) during conztruc[lon and r+hen the project 1s compleced? If any,
9enerally describe and give approxlmate qvantftes tr known. T h e r e W 1 1 1 b e
an increase in dust during construction. There will be
an increased levels of automobile emissions consistaiit
with an increase or juu auto trips per day. .'i-liere-al-so
wI I 1---brC GlTl .7 ~111. 1 i n wo-Q'Q ::5ntok-z~ °?ir-I s s I-_-1i-v
b. Are [here any of!-siie sources of emtsstons or odor thai may affeCC your propozal? if ;o,
generally describe. pionP known Or identified.
C. Proposed mea wres to re6vice or control emisstons or oeher tmpacts [o ei tf ny:
As the overall area developes to urban ~3 un-ri,5/d=e )
densi-t-'r~_-,-, t-l~ 1 Fu,v^; , o~
v
W11r b2 gr-oat-ezr. a-l~ -trictet' t'Pctt) 1 at lnilys, n_f WOoC3
stoves will result in decreases in the levels of wood'
smoke.*During construction, road will be watered to -
reduce dust creation and also to prevent ort-site
traLitiiiy vi uil i.. .
3. uATER
a. $urface:
(1) Is there any surfece water boAy on or in che trrrnedtate victnity of the site (ncluCinq year-
round and seasonei streams, saltxater, lakes, ponds, vetlands)? if yes, deserlbe type and
provi6e names. If approprtate, state xhat strcam or river it flows into.
None known or indentifiable on the site.
(2) utll the projeet requtre any wrk over, tn, or adjaeent to (wichtn 200 fcet) tne descrlbed
waters? If yes, plcase dcserlbc and att uh aviilable plans.
Not applicable, see above.
3
' SPO1Vv'M LliVIR01QMT72AL ORDItiA!tCE
(`.tAt :97-11-400) Seccion 11.10.230(1) ,
. ~
b. LNVLR0H14'_NTAL ELY2tEh"S (contlnued)
' EvaluaClon,for
Agency Uae Only
(J) Eetlraetc Che soount oC (I11 end dredgc oatetial that vould be placed in or temoved from tha
aurfacc va,er or veclands enE ind! u tc cAc sree of the elce Ch.t vould De afCected. Indicatc
the 30urce of f111 meterinl.
(4) Vlll che gropo.al rcquicc •urficc w tc[ Wtichdra.+al* ot diveroiona? Clvc •;cneral deacrlp-
Cion, purpoee, and approxlma[c quantitles, it knwn. Tlhp pr~ TnnoSG'~1 W111nnt
"
result in the withdrawal of any surface waters.
(5) Doee the propoeal lle w(thin a 100-year llood piilnt If so, notc locicion on-che sttc plen.
The site is not within any 100 year flood plain.
(b) Doca the p[oposel involvc any dlseharaei of v u[e oaCerlela to aurfete vnccrs? 1[ •o,
deaeClbe the Cypc of veote and enclelpated volua of dlstharge.
The proposal does not involve the-discharge of any
materials inLO surrace waters.
Cround :
. (1) G'lll gcoundveter bt withd[svn, or vdl! va[er bt dletlurFcd co groundva:ec' Glvc gcnetal
dascription, pvrposc, an4 appraxirwtc yuanCltlcs, i( 1mown.-Th P j W-i11 be
served by Consolidated Irrigation District #19. Their
primary source of water is from wells. They indicate that
they can serve the site. tiny water aiscnargen co
gruuiidwdtui ' I-b-~=
o n -s.J.-f- rl-4 c---pe~ --Q W?._r S1
(2} Deeerlbe w sce matcYlal ;ha[ vill Ec dl.eharged lnto Che gCOUnA frum sepGie tanks oT oCht.r
a.nl u ry v,ece cru enenc l.el1!sp. Dcsertbe che gencr.l .ice ot the .yat o, Ehe nur.bcr o(
hov3t3 CO bt etY`+td (1: applltable) Of [he oum ber of peCsOtv Cht ayaCto(s) atc cxpcCCCd io
3 C rV~Effl»Pnt trnm ~n site s,ystems wi12 be consistant with
approved svstems. S.C.H.D. regulations for installation
and operation will be followed. There will be 27 new , on-site systems • ATI-homes wY-IT-be
Y^^4- r ~~^;1itate future connection.
a n d--d-ry--3-'rr~ ~ ~re-r-s-i-rrsL _ a-, _ ea _ ,n ,~r ~
(3) Deeeclbe aay sy&Cems, otner t1u n those deslgned (or the dispoaal of sanltary vAste,
lnet&lled Io[ tht pucpo.e o( dl.ch.rging (lu(ds Dclov the Sround •ur(•ec (inCludca mystea• eueh
as thoae (or the dlapo.a l of stora va tet or dralnage [roo tloor d n ln# Dcicrlbe che tYpc o! _
iyscem, the amounC o( meccr:il co be dlsposed ol [h[ough Che system and [hc ry pt0 o( ma[erl&le
t(kcly Co bt dlsposed of (Lnelu6ing auCC[lal, vhftA mAy e Cer Che ~~[en L•dve Cently thCOU h
,rt~~, o~ .a ~ or (lteltahting .<<iy<<t~.>. ~I 20" swa~es ~o e usec~ for
the disposition of storm water. As the proposal is
for residential uses, there will not be bU1K storage
of any crifYeeil mazeftal-s, o-r-ttre i
fac~~~
(G) Vill ,n7 ehenleals (c#yeelally oC;anle solvenCs or pe[TOleuo (uels) be scored !n •bove-
Scor~a. or gOrgfJUlk.coS~~Or`jge t6~' avl~ ec
,
~
3POKANL Ct(PZROtR(EKiAL ORDItiANCE
(VAC 1g7-11-760) Secclon 11.10.230(1) " •
b' LTNIROlME1rtAL Cl.l.?SL1T:5 (conCinued)
Evaluaclon f'or
Ageoc7 Usc OrLly
(S) Vhat proCecCive eeasure• vtll De Caken co lnaure Clut leaks or •pill• of any chcalcjls .
stored or uscd on vlce vill not Dc alloved to pcreolaCe Co aroundwa[er (Chi■ iacludcs acasvrcs
Co kcep themitals ouC of dispota) mya[cos descClbed Ln 3D(2) anA 3b(3)?
c. ua[er P.uno![ (tocludloS e[orn watcr):
(1) Describe the source of runo(! (including sCOrm vater) snd me[`iod of colleccion aad dlsposal
!t any (lncludc Quencltlcs, lf knovn). Nhere vlll [hl• %.eccr flov? tl111 ch1s %,+.ce: `low lnto
other vatera'. If ao, dcscriDe. T- o nYNl~_~~ n~ -h, ~
-e-s-e-u~-c-~o--.n~
runoff w}11 be from impervi oLs surfas,e~,~ ~1120811
swales will be used to pre-treat runoff.
(2) J111 iny thcmicals bc rtored, handlcd or u.ed on the •ltc Ln a lou Glon whe[e i$plll or
leiw vlll drein co 3urface or groundvater oc to •sto r_ vstcr dieposel oyeten dt►cAerging co
sur(ace or grovnAwacer?'I'hp--~ cz
chemicals, but there will be very sliaht chance of
discharge into-surface or groundwater.
(3) Could weatc maccrl.ls cnter ground or .urtete ..ttcr.? i[ so, genct.lly destrlb--.
There is alwav$ the cb.~ince of waste materials
being introduced into ground and surface waters. :
However, such occurances would be rare and strictly
ducidenzal. 'l-neir scope woulu Ae slignz as a
eensequenee - ?e-sidei`2-tia--_1----u-4.,- s. prop@-ged.,
G. Proposcd oeAeurca to reducc oc con(rol sur(acc, ground, a^2 -unoC( veter tmpac:a,
C :hc propOeed eCCion lles wLCh1n (ht AGu1ftC Stne ltlve Acee be espeelally C1ea C on cc~:er.aCion•
. tcleting co tec:lSclcs conccrntng Scction. 1b(4), 3b(5), .nd 3c(2) oC chis chccY,ll.Li:
The proposal will utilize measures as reQuired by
the Office of the Spokane County Engineers
to reauce impacts to grouna ana surtace waters.
- P 1.A:7 i S
a. rheek or eirelc rype o( veget&[ton found on che ettc:
dceSd uous crce: ..lder, e.plc, .ipen, othei. .
eyetgtccn Cree: flz, eedar , ylne, oCher . s hruDa .
gr a 8 e.
pastuce.
X_ crop oc araln. "
vet 3oll plenta, e+Ctall, buCE cCtup, bullrush, skunk tabbaRe, othec. ,
votei plinCa : watcr lllly, eelgraas , vll(oll, other.
other typr.s o[ vcScc.tion.
b. Vhnt kind snd ♦mount of ve6etatlon v:ll bc [evoved or a1Ce[ed? m L.,-, r. ltr~ ^l.~~ y ~n
~f-Ft
~-u1 t i vatPd for many vears. gt p.resent i-t has been
plowed, in part; and the remainder has the stubble
frm ~rior crops. '~he top few inches of soilwill be removed.
C. Llet C reic ed o[ eodangeCCd . peelcs o-n to De on or near the sSee.
None
C. Proposed landeeapLng, uoe o( natlve p L nCs, or oChei ne u ures Co teeetYC or enhanCe ve eCaCloo
on the .i_c, ir .nr: Landscani.ncr consistant with resic~ential
dovol npmont / l ac.rrac tr-eel- `}o • ~
i
S
• SPOY.AtiE 'LHYIROHHEKTAL ORDiMA11CE
(WAt 197-11-960) Section 11.10:230(1)
B. ENYIROTMENTAL ELEHEHTS (continued)
• Evaluation For
' - Agency Usc Only
5. ANINAL$
a. Ctrcle any birdz and animals xhich have been observed on or near the sitc or are kn arn to be on
or near the s1te:
birdt: haxk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: 17r
V a v
mamnals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: 9T11a1 1 1"QC1P1']t q
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: ' other:
G. Lizc any threatencd or endangered species kno,+n to be on or near the site.
N p n P k{.nl,w n..._.nlr C1 h-cZ P 1' V Pd .
c. Is the site part of a nigration route? [f sa, explain. i e n
rni~ t P _
, d. Proposed neasures to preserve or enhence xildllfe, 1( any: Cp-e~ c! Clf hlr r3,c:
and rodents that utilize the -present habitat
are adaptable to the habitat created by residential
• development and the concurrent landscaping.
Tr i e t e %VtTliiu e d-Cti-n o'e' a-f-
5. :NERGIf AttD NATURAL RESOURC:s p ha}-~ a+ }-~l7pe dp rea ip diversity of species.
a. Vhat k1nEs of encrgy (le~~TZ, ~tdCOP~3~; `G~d 4'fd"v~, solarl v(Tpbe useo neei- the
the compleced project's energy needs? Oescribe ohether St will be useG for heating, nanufac-
turing, etc. ~~~~sa-1 wi 1..1 ttitilizP elE',l`trir, natural gas
enerav urimarilv. Wood and solar enerqy will probably
have minor applications. Energy will be for residential
uses only.
b. would your projecc affect che potential vse of solar ener,y by ecjacen: properties? i•` se,
generally describe.
ThP i-.-, sur-h--tha-t
there will be no affect upon adjacent properties
that would preclude the use of solar energy.
c. uhat kinds of ener4Y conservation (eatures are included ir, the plans of this prooosal? L1s:
other proposed :neesures to reduee or eontrol energy Impacts, 1f any:
'Ch.P oropnsa 1 does not preclude the use of a
broad ranqe of energy conservation measures by
individual home owners. The fact that it is consistant
wi £h t-he c:omprenens ive pian ( tffft1--1 d t)
d-ot o p-rom-o~.t= e-f -
7. £NYIRONMENTAL H£AITH
Art there any envirorunental heaich hatarGs, tnclvding exposure [o tox.lc Chernicals, risk of (ire
and explosion, spill, or nazardous vns:e, that eould ocev•- as e rezvlt of chls proposni' If so,
describe.
(1} Deseribe special ert+ergeocy servtces thac might be required.
`Chp n.e.er1-, nf thP px4 n o s a 1 a r e w i t h i n t h e
' ~q n,f nrPsent emercrency services.
~7gCT"drl e-rV7 Ce,, dTt i2eed'2'Q .
6
(vAC 197-11-960)= Sectlon 11.10.270(1) r'_ ' Y VW v.W
. i
'i. •MI ItOTRMNI.IL Lt.a¢T7T5 ( c o n t i nu e d) '
. + • Lvalustlon Por
~o~r u.~ o~r
Ag
L►IVIRONH¢Ir:AL HLALZN (continved)
(2) Tropomed ecasutcs co rcduce or control '._'.lronmen ul healch hazarda', 1[ anr:
/a c~
r7 '~QG~'rY~crl7.
1~1Q identifiable no r i r om o T'LT~rtC'RTbZT
~'ccr
a-r-P assoc•i a. d wi th . P t2-~ropnsal for r,esi c3ential
housinq.
e. Not.c:
(1) 1Jhae cypes of nolse exlrt /n Che area vhlth say a!(ett yOUC project (let etAspltt tt&((Ie,
equipeent, operatton, ochert T-hp cU-P 1 C czzparsel.y pnp.llla t Pd
at present, however theadjacent elementary school
does have higher levels of noise due to buses, and traffic.
There are no otner sources ot noise at present.
(2) Vf+it types and ltyela of nolse would be ereated b7 or •ssotlaced vlth the projeet on •
short-eetu or a ]on;-terv Das1s (fot cxaople: tra((!t, eorvcruttlon, operatlon, other)' lndi u te
vhat houcs nolse would cose (row the slte. T p f h P -,h o r t t- P r m, t h e r e w1 1 1
be increased levels of noise consistant with construction.
In the long term, there will be an increase in noise
levels associatea witn zo new singie iamiiy riuraes.
gen-e-ra-t-etl--by-t-hes-c home s .
(7) Proposed ■easure co reduec or control nolsc tepaets, il .ny:
No special measures proposed.
9. lA'ID ANn SIIORtl.lilE USE
i. vf+st f• the eurrent use o[ the iite and idJ.eent propertles'-T-hQ ci-t-e ' t 1 y
used for two re.ajdences and some crop production.
b. „ke t ACW1 Q'?At~d1A.s,~,s1cAA9,lV9, .4.,A&hoo1 , residences and some agriculture.
Ta.p GU,- ki.a q he e n tl S e L~f nT" a n r; rn i t mx-p.T-t ts- c a p a b 1 e
of limited production of crops such as corn.
Its size precludes viable utilization for ,
exclusively agric~~tural usFs.
C. DcscrlDc .nr .cruceurce on tne .i<<. ere are WO residenees Ori the _
site, one a mobile home to be removed. There are also
t
old hree small sheds, a barn, a ather large shed, ana an .Al-I z cz, ha-n--tirt: resi d e n c e
at--E_ 1-9-9-92 _ b2 ~ ~~o-vo-,- .
d. Nl11 any structurei be deeollsfied! Il so, vhlth! A 1 1 s t r u e t u r e s
other than the residence at E. 18002 4th. will
be demolished. The mobile home at E. 1/yUb 4tn
W111 lJC LClUl:dl.CU•
e. 1/h.t 1s the eurrent eonina el.•e ifiu tlon of the 9 ieet [J • R• 3.5
'
Vhst 1o the eutrent cooprcheculve pLn designAtlon o( the sltet IJRBA
t. i( rpplltaDle, vrat 1s tl+e cu[rent shorellne u ster pro6[ao AtsSgTICSOfl o( cl,c siceT
.
}l.■ •nr part of tha •1tc eecn cl•ssLfled •o an 'eariro mfteotnlly ■en,ltkve" are•1 I( $o,
, . .v«ic,• Not apn1 i cable, no sensitive sites. - -
J • '
1. Appro:imatel7 hov *uny people vovld realde oL vock lo [1+e coapleted projeecl -
Th.P n-r~ r^.s a-1 wo.tia 1.d,-r r~ ~~-e--Q :7 n_., e 5, fvi dgp r ox . 100 p e o p 1 e.-
7
S PO x.l.`TL LNVI ROMaN7AL 0 RA I NANCE
(VAC 197-11-96C, Seccion 11.10.230(1) '
5. ETlV1RONKLTTf4L CLL'ft?rf5 (conclo"d)
:valuecion FoC
' Agency Use On,ly
J. Approxi"Lely ho- miny pcoplc would the compleced projec[ dimp L ce'.
k. Proposed ocaeuce3 Co avoLd or teduce displicanent impecC., iC any: T h e r e s i d e n t s
of the existing mobile home would be displaced, however
that residence will be replaced with a conventionally
built . d-tsv-tr~-_ c r e a t e d.
-A~~-m e a s u r°_ a-r-e ; c r.rLl.r1,CL,r . . .
displacement.
1. Proposed oeasurce to cnruCe the propoeal 1• compaCiDle vlth cxisting &nd pro ected Lnd usce and
plans, ic .ny: ~'he t~ropo,,,l is consistant wit~ the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan, and the existing zoning, thus.it
is compatable with projected land uses. This area is
in zransif-ion neLween rura.i--Tise5 d n uses.
2 4
--qlltc _ 1A__ L.'- j e c t e d
i n t h P C.nm.D.re.he.nsimP P_]_an.
4. NOUSING
Approxisoately how nanr unlts vould De provtded, L[ sny'. Indl u ce vhetrer high-, mlddlc-, or
Io,.- incamee hou. t ng . 7 1.A-COnLta ,,inif~.cz u;l1 r A r r P a t e d.
b. l.pproximatcly hov many unlcs, '1( any, vould be e11o.IruteCl Indlute v►.ethec high-, mlddle-, or •
lov-lneome houetng. _Onp rpl dd-LP 1 Y1C`nmP T11nhl 1 P
home will be replaced by one home of conventional
c. Propo~cr-~.tru~tiPn or conzrol hou.ing lmpact., .ny:
T~jn n A
:o. ,XsTiiETIcs
A. 1!'neC 1i the CallceC hclght oI •n7 pTOpomc1 scruCrur1c(i), not 1n41uding •nCc ai? a1uC 1~e the
princlp•1 excerior builditig mAceri.l(a) propo.ed' 1 ~ s t o r i e s t o ~L s t o r i e s•
consistant with the existing zone. Exterior
material will be primarily wood.
D. lfiac vlcve ln the lanedlace vie(nicy vovld be .ltercd or oD+crueeeAt
1Vone.
C. Propo.ed me,sure. to reAuec or eontrol .c.chetle lmp.et•, lf .ny:
~no
ll. LIGH' 4;10 GU➢.F.
Whee type o( llghe or gLsrc vlll the propo•al produec? :rh.t elme of d.7 would lt m.lnly oeeur?
The -prope-s-a_l za i__1 r_-r-.e.a-t.P I_i.riY~t_ rr)n s_i.s_t.a.nJ-- wi t h
28 new homes, durina hours consistant with residential development.
b. Could llghe or 6 Lre (ron the (lnlshed pcojceC be • ulety hazard or lnEtC(tre v1Ch vlevsl
f qjt~- tr) rreat a cafPf-v ha .ard,__
c. 1rh.t O~,t.cing1nt-@rfjerce 0W11t-'h oNg1ecWaSny•aitcct rour proposalt .
There may be some light from the elementary school north of the s i te .
d. Propo.cd a usurce co ceducc or cootrol liaht and gl.rc Lap.ecs, i( anr: •
We r+ peei a7 m easurCp s Y14/'1 Y1/'1C 0~
6
SPOCAh? LNVIROh^tZYI.Il. ORDINANCE
(VAC 19)-11-960) Seccion 11.10.230(1) •
b.. t7iVIAO1ML'iZAL LLI?QNTS (coaCloucd) .
EvaluaCion for
Agency Use Onlr
12. RLCAEA?lOtl
A. tilha[ dcslgnaCed and lntocmal cecreaclooal oppor w nlclcs •re Sn the immedlate viclnicp?
TITc s-i-t-c i T?g i:'GTI-1."n'easy dr- 1 v 1 n g d i s-r}'-i r'_'~_ ~c t-e
9,.evera1 1a s, and al so Wa11r in thP Wi 1 c3 7 Qp.
,
D. Would the propoacd project dimpLce eny existing recru clonal uece? Lf eo, deecrlbc
1~T n bF is1~la nto m onv-~ F ~---cs--e
r~'CS-'~ tilGTl CG '
facilities.
c. Proposed mcesures co reduce or control lmpacca on recrcacion, including rccreacional opporcunt-
tles co be provtded by the pcoject or appli u nt, 1t •ny:
Nnna - '
11. H1570P.IC AND NLTURAL PRESERVA:'IOh
A. Are chere any pl.ces or objccts li.ced on or propo,ed for natlorutl, a tatc or local preaecv•-
t!on regiscers knovn Eo De on or ncxc to the sICC? If .o, gencrally deacrlbe.
Not applicable
b. Gencratiy dc■criDe .ny lando.ckm or evidence o( h.eLoric ucheeologlcal, .clcncl!ic or culcuc,l
loportsnce 1~ own to be on or ncxt to the site.
. . .
c. ProponeA aeeaurci Lo fetuce or coni:ol topetca, ;f any:
not applicable
IG. Ti1Att5P'OP.7ATION
A. [dcnclfy publle screec• .nd hlbhweys serving the alte and deeerlbe proposcd ececsa .o the
txiat:ng eCt'ee[ systea. Show-on si:c plana, 1f nny. T-b-p S-ij'_p baS front-a-g P Q]Z both 4th. Ave. and LOng Road. There will be extensions
of both Sth. and 6th. aves. eastward from Long
road. 5ix lots will taxe access rrom 4tn ave.
Ttn= w-i t-h-i-n--~ '2, mi-1-c!U af-aeeP-q-s-t o
TT1+'GYCfn+'G] can
b. Is site eutree[ly served by publle traosl[? IC noC, vpu: 1• [he •pyrozlma« Giscanee [o the
otAteac Cretu lt oeop? ;
t-r-a-n s i t .
T,hP nParPRt. t-ransi .s_on is within 'k mij e.
e. flov a.ny p.ckiog .peees vould the coopleced project heve' Fiov man7 vould the projaet eliatn.cc?
The proposal would not eliminate any parking .
spaces; eacn nome woula nave provisions ror -
a-f-f .
d. vlll :eQulre •nr oev [wd@ or sC[ee[s, o[ impcovimenCe [o cx:sting roeds or strce[@
noc lneludlrg driveva7o' If so, 6coeriily deie[ibe (lndlu te vhecher puD11e or prtvi[e).
Two new streets wou1d he constructed to provide
access to interior lots. An added 5 feet would be
dedicated.to both 4th and Long, and those roads
p a v e d-t u tY[ZSert extbttiiy .
e. Vill Lhe projeec u.e (or oeeur lu the inmedl.ee vteioley ot) %aeeer, rall, or •i: tr+aupore.tion?
Tt .o, generally de.eribe. -N-ot_ a n n 1 i r- a h 1 0
9
SPOK.INY ENVIRON:tP.T.'fAL ORDIYANCL
(uru 197-11 ;960) Seccion 11.10.230(1)
B. LtR'IP,OK~_AL LLi?Cf.'NTS (coaclnucd)
Lvaluatlon for
. . Agcncy u.e orLlr
t. flov nany vehlculi: crlp• per day vwld Ee generaced by the c w plcCcd project' IC kr:avn,
tndlcaie vhen puk would accur. ThP proposal WOllld gQ.Jlerate
10 trips per day per residence, for a total
of 270 added trips. Peak hours would be
-i n m o r nit'RTs d n a e v e n Ms, g o1 uu1rriZrg
~r- 9 m a ha t e Trv`1f .
g. Propos<d measurce co reducc or conceol transporcaClon lmpecc., if .ny:
N-o Tp@Gial p-r-o ose-d
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. '.lould the proJect result In en incrc•red need tor puiltc .ervtcea (tor exeaplc, Clrc frotectlon,
po1:CC preLC,:tlon, healCh cacc, schools, othe[)' If so, Ecnerally de.cribe.
T._h er~ wJ-1-1--a G L.i~h~- . i...n-t-h.P tte P d for
public services. However as this proposal is
consistant with the Compreherisive plan
provisions for those increases ln service
~i.~ e e r i pruVT ,.wit!111n-t~hne- p-1-&n .
b. PropoecC oe•surta to rcducc or eont[ol dlieet :epaeCs on publle ..rv!ees, nny: •
No s e ial mPa,si1rPs to mitiaate the minor impacts
involved.
16. U"ILI'IES
' a. Clrele ut!lltlea eu'ren:'_! evef"ble st che atte: eleeCrlelty, ftACUCAl ess, vater, :e!uae
se:v:te, celeyhooe, enn!:n;/ aever, sc',itie ayEtce, ochc:.
D. Deaerlbc the ueilltlee chic ere proposed for che pro}ce[, the uC411ty provtdln6 CTu ,ec-vlec end
Che atneral eonattvt;lon .etlvitles on .he sltt or !n the 1mo.:Jlstc Y1CSntty -hleh =~:;hc bc
n c c d e E. i%Pt~' %.,e'r L"i-rltt t-'L *-i- Q~f--p(lwt;;~-r-E_r_Qm--XW_P' gaC Lx oIn
TAUP. tPl PT7Y1nT'1P_ frQm PNWB; drv lines sewers will
be coonstructed, on-site systems used on an interim
basis.
C. SICNANRL
~
the undcrelgned, ov u r undtr the penalCy o( perJury C1ul che •bove reeponscs arc mAde trvt::ully and to ;he besc ol or knovledge. I•lao
.undetscand chat, •tiould there be •ny vlllful nit rcpresen[& tlon or v[llful Lek o[ full distloiure on ary pari, Che a en eiey v1ChdCav eny
determlnaeion of norulgnlfiunce tlue it mtaht i..ue in rellanee upon chSs eheekli.t.
Theron Hitchcock
oa«: FP r,Lar=Y 1g92 Propooent
(Pleja.e Prine or Type) _
Proponcnc: "A(,: l.6 [`G rcl•f A4dre..: L3_3J_0 1 3th .
(5lgrwturc)
'hone : _924- -7 ' S.pokane, Washinqton 99216
Pc-.on compl<<inf; rorv: ArthLlr Nnl 1 Da<<: s2/l3~~t2
°hone: 926 156-1 ! /
FOR STAYP DSE ONLT
Sca(f mccobcr(ii) revlcving eheckllat:
a.ied on CRla ata(I rcvlev o( t1e elvlronmr.nta1 eheeklloC •nd OthtC per[lnent in(ocnaCiOn, Lt.t iCs!f: A. Contludc# [he[ thcre are no pYOsaD1e •i6n1C1CanC idverae 1iapaeta and teeomueods + deccrmlauc:an of noculanifletnec.
D. Goneludeo c?ut proDaD2e slEolfie•nc .dverte cnvlronmenc•1 iap•ets do ez1.t for cT.e eu rrent propo.•1 and reeonmendr . miclg.teC deecr-
nioation of nonslgaif:c.occ %eich coodltio".
C. Coneludes clut thetc arc probaDlc m16nif1taoC •dve[ac eovi[otmental 1apaeco •nd :ceanmends a dccecvin.Clon oC aignlfiu ote.
TILIIIC YLX - 175.00
10
/ ~ .
7 PLANNING DEPAR-TMENT
.
.
p..._ - M •
S.0+•wt tov+.• cu~+ov)t
PRELIMINA.RY SUBDIVISIDN APPLICATION
P ART I _
. . ~
~
A. r rn6I, 1NrOn vi TTONi
NAME OF APPLICANI'/REPRESENTATIVE: T'hP r an H i t-~-r c- o clt / Ar thu r N o 11
. MAILING ADDRESS: __F. ~.4 2,3 '12-n d . &Y-e. .
CITY: Spokane STATE: Wash. ZIp: 99216
PHONE: 9 2 6-15 61 (work) g 2 6-15 61 (home)
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE tiVRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Theron hitchcock - pHpNE; 924-3327
MAI.LING ADDRESS: _ E. 13310 13th. Ave t.
CITY: Spo]cane ! STATE: Wash. ZIP: 99216 PR4JECT/PROPOS AL SITE AREA (acres or sq. Ct) 8.a? a c_r e~
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) none
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PRO7ECT/PROPOSAL 5 51 q1. _ 0F 1 & c;-5-1 A 1. 06-lj
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED None S TREET AD DRES S OF PROPOS AL 1..949 2 4-4,-h r ~
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFTCATIOV(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) TTR 1_ S
EXISTING USE OFPR4PERTY ~t,,Ln Si ngj P fami lv homPs, and vacant COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY URBAN
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley School District N0. 356
FIRE DISTRICT Spokane County,Dist .#1 WATER PURVEYOR C.I.D. No.. 19
PFZOPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings ~X) Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Ocher ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
UcLa,p - ~hai- Z.TG a YP aTJa YP tlf _
B. LrCTAL INFORMATInN:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: S,iyt-hPa St. rQrner of 4-tb an.d Lona
'
. SECT'ION 19 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 45
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVTDING ACCESS: 4+-t,. AZTe_~~.d T.nnrs Rnarl WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUIILIC RJAD:63Q I on 4th 610' on Lona
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERTAL YES (X) NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS ~arr 1;.. a 1-. lo
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (ALtach lcgal description stampcd by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE
LEGAL DESCRIPTIOiN FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMLNARY SUBDNISION
MAP. ,
,S • '
a !
SUBDiVISION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
LF Y(JU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? Real Estate
Sales Agreement C Copy Attached )
WHAT A.RE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS QF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WA.RRANTED? Urban designation under the Spokane County Comprehensive
Land Use Plan; Zoning Desijznation as UR 3.5
WHAT IMPACT WII..L THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE ADJACEN'T' PRQPERTIES9
All of the adjacent properties are also Zoned UR 3.5 ( see EnviromentcU Checklist)
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? ProPosal is within the P.S.S.A.
consistant with both current Zoning and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S TMPACT N
SURROUNDING LAND USE? As the adj acent Zones are also UR 3. 5, t ere are
no unique measures proposed to mitigate conflicting land uses.
C. PRELIMTNARY SUBDI,VZSYON CENEI2AL INFnRMATYnN: .
NUMBER OF LOTS: 29 GROSS AREA: 8•$2 acres TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 101,400 sq. feet pROPOSED NET DENSITY*: 4•0 units/ acre SMALLEST LOT SIZE: 10,400 sqd feet FRONTAGE: 100 feet
PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER:
7ndividual wells O Public system ~ Private Community System O
Other ( } - Describe:
. PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: .
Public sewcr O Community system O Septic tank and drainfield ~
Double Plumbing (X)< Dry Scwer Tj Other
Describe:
UTILITY COlvIPANIES- AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVTDE SERVICE T4 THIS PROPOSAL: .
ElecUicity: Washington Water • Power n Sewer: Spokane County Utilities Dept.
Gas: Washington Water Powivnter; C.I.D. #19 Phone: P•N•W.B.
DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVETIT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY
PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS
PROPOSAL? Yes No ~x) IF YES, EXPLAIN:
D. PRELIMINAR'Y STJBDxVI.SZnN YMPRnVEMENT INFnRMATInN: "
LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEIviENTS PROPOSED: Private roads
Public roads (XK Arlerial roads Tract X roads
DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE:
~
ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: ,
Spring of 1993 ~
IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes O No
IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION IviAP.
IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLA"I'ED (Parks, schooZs, etc.)? Yes O No*~J
IF YES, DESCRIBE:
0
* NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVA'1'E AND/OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA.
o ' • .
•
SUBDIVrSION APPLICATION . Page 3 of 4
P ART II -
. THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION tiYII,L PROVIDE THE PLA.NNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WTTH
WRTTTEN VERIFICATION THAT T'HE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON WITH TH$
AGENCIES IDEN1'IFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FIRE MARSHA.LL/FIRE DXSTRICT
A. THTS PROPOSAL 1S WITHIN FT.RE PROTECTIO NO. f.
13. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) HAVE NOT BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
. IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUAI7E WATER STEM AND.FACILITIES FOR FTRE
PROTECTION PURPOS ES .
C. RECOMMENAED FIRE FLOW: . ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFIlVITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BYJII.DING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME.
D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: N't5~~~ ~t v~•f~`l 5~~~~ 7'~ ~'r~''`'7 ~~'b"
~
~ f
FIRE DI9TRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR
A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS F F.&jIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQLTIREMENTS (HAVE) HAVE N6DT BEEN MADE. _
I3 . REQUIREMEN'FS/COMNIv[EENTS:
~
44
DISTRICT SX~NAhtXlTLE--
WATER r DATE '
COUN'I'Y ENGZNEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AiNll GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS :
tNATUkE-AM~E DATE
COUN i'Y U'1'ILYTYES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAZ. OF THIS PROPOSAL ("N-A-VL'S (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNA'IE-D
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THTS SITE IS A. COMMENTS: A Y-//~~~-~ Z .
SIGNATURElTITLE DATE
HEALTH DISTRZCT
A PRELIMIlVARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE-AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) QrAVE NO D) BEEN SATISFIED. , .
A . COMMENTS : C l 7) ' (I 41 c-
.
v SIGNATUI2EJTITLE t7" DA
SEWER PURVEYOR
A P12ELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAK.EN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY TI-IE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATUREJTITLE DATE _
. " •
a
SUBDNISION APPLYCATION Page 4 of 4
PA.RT III '
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I. THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION . HE LEGAL DESCRZPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR
VISION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY
ti ON REG TIONS AND WS STATE OF WASHINGTON. . .
.ti: ~ I~D DATE: 2 " -7''
150 ~D PHONE:
•A"
zIP: ~
~ISTE~ ,.•~r .
'
CANU
PART IV
(SIGNATURE 4F PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE -
MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. .
I FURTHER S WEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF. REC4RD OF THE A.REA PROPOSED FOR THE
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFLED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS
WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HISiHER BEHALF.
i
S IG NED: `I'heron Hit chcock . DATE: February 10, 1992
ADDRESS: E. 13310 13th, A've. PxONE: 924-3327
Spokane, Washington 99216 ZIp: 99216
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE "DATE
STATE OF WASHTNGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN TO/AFFIRMED BEFORE ME QN TITIS DAY OF
Februaz~t 11992, BY Theron Hitchcock
NOTARY SEA•r -
'Notary Public in and for the Stac ashi gton
Residing at: Spokane, Washingt n
'
My appointment expires: June 18, 1992
.
i
PA.RT V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNIlNG DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUBMITTED:
DATE ACCEPTED: BY: ,
TOTAL FEES: . RECEIPT - .
•
, •
,
APPLICATZON ACCEPTA.N'CE A.N]J DESYGN RE'V'IEW
SPOK.ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPAR'Z'MENT
Date:
Deparnnent:
~ - .
Department Contact Person:
Application Number: ~ - Acuon: ~2aQ
APPLICATION AC.CEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING: from 2:30 to 2:50 at the PlanninLr DeDarcment - ~
Note: . . ,
The following information is to provide the proposal sponsor with primary agency
comments to assist. the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing item.s heard before
che Hearing Examiner Comrnittee. The.following informaaon does not provide a complete
or binding final review of the proposal. This will occur only after the proposal is accepted
and placed on the Public Heanng Agenda. The Acceotance of the apnllcadon and
scheduLinq of the aZlication on the Public Hearing Agenda is the primary function of this .
meeting. A secondary function. of this meeting is to provide a prelimingl,y review of th&
ap 1~ ication. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to
expect as standard development conditions and design recommendarions.
The comments received are based on a preliminary review of the application fozm and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the information (not alI
agencies/departments have been contacted--onlyfhose who have been determined to have
pnmary interest. . . ' 1. a. Dces the application (or can the development) meet requirements to be placed
on the Public Hearing Agenda? YES ❑.NO
b. If no, what is lacking? .
c. What requirements have not been met? 2. After a nreliminarv review of the annlication what "Conditions of Approval" would
be required of the development? (Attach conditions if necessary)
. c
~ v
3. Department Recommendations: .
,
4. Additionallriformation: . .
r.DFr- Ic::L Or- THE COUNTY EniGz NEER
; Ppk-:ANE COIJhITY y WMJI-I I t\IG'TOhi
I'1a1'' ch -4y 1S~'_4'.2'
TOo ~pcnE::ane C---,_(nty Planning Department (Current Plannii-ia
Admi.nistrat-ir)
FROM: 5p-:4-.:ane C----IAnty Enqineers Depar-tment
SUBJe Subdivision Conclitic-ns, nlame Hitchcock's_2nd_Acld.
Ni_tmber Unassigned
re: Subdivisions
Trle fol1oW1nQ~"Co('1dit1orls c-f Approval " f-DY tr12 aboV2 YE'fEal''enC(?d
si_tbdivisic-n are submitted t-D the Spok:ane County Planninq
Department for incli_tsic-n in the Desiqn Rev:iLew Meetinq sched+_tleci
~ Mar c 1°1 4 , 199::: p
E 1 The c-Dnditic-nal apprcival -_-~fi the p1at ia qiven by the Coi_irity
Ei-iqi.i-ieer sub.ject to deciication ~---f riqht-of -way and ara~~roval
of the rriad system as indicated in the preliminary plat c-f
record.
E That p7ans, profi1es ~nd crc-5s secti-Dns aS rJesiqnecl t-D
C-Dunty si:andards showinq proposed street centerline and ci_trb
cirades be si_ibmittec.i tc, tFie Gounty Eric7i.rieer fc-r apprc-val
przor to constructic-n and/or the fil.inU of a final p1.atq
rc-~ad plans to be prepared under the direction of a liczn~ed
f'rc-fGs51-iflal Civi]. Engineer~
E 3: p -rhat drainacJe plans =-xnr_i clesign calcuJ.ati-ins showinq thP
alianment of dr-~:~in~..~qe fac.il. ities ue suvmi~'ted to the Couni:y
Erlq1.nE'EY foY' appYcivcZl F)'t''ic-oi'' •tci Coriz.:.~t1''uc:'rJ..on c?fld/oY tFic
filinq ---If tfie fii°ia.1 plata Drairiac7e plans to be prepared
un ci er ~ t he cl irec t i. c-n -::-i: Et '1 x r. e nseci F'r c-fA y s ir--n a Z C i v i. :t
EnqiiiePr-.
r i C: -_-,nLa i; rur. t ion w ithi n the p r-Dp---js e ci pub]. i. cstree t s ari d
easemeni:s sl-iall be perfc-rmed undPr the direct superv.iCai-iri ~if
xi.censed eryni.neerlsurvey-irq whr-I sFial l. furnish the C"W~IAnty
Er-►qineer witi-i "As I"~1Ailt" plans anci a ceri;ifieate in wri.tinci
1:hat a1 :I. improvemFrynts were inst-Al].ed t-,- the li.nes ancl c]rades
t=► ("I .=IW fl +ifl tl"I e <--4(:)pY.:.Ved -ifl sti' uCt.L o11 P 1 c I-i„"-a c.~ fl Cj t f'I tl t c-i ll
d:i. sti..i r bed rn nurn en t s f~iave ka eP i-i rep 1a-ced.
~
r
paCa e
F L-~ No r -n at Y1_l C t l-DCl W-::-Y 1< 5 tr~ t] E? F) C:' 'Ir f oY' rn Cj W-i! t 1"t J.. I-i theex 1 st 1 fl (_J
cir- p roposec1 Pl_tblic Ri_ g ht-• C--if•- W ayi_tr-i ti-I a per-rn i t t-ias beer-i
isslied by the C~ Dunty Cnciineere A1 l. wc-r-k- :i~ suh.jeci: i;-a-
:i nspec t i c~ i-i a ri cl apprr--val bythe C-Duri t y En q x. n eere
E 7 All construction witl-iin tf-ie existinq cer propcnsed f'i_iblic
Riqht-of-Way is t---- lae. cr-ImpXeted pri.cir tc. tilinq the fina1
pIat or a bond in the amc-unt estimated by the County
Eriqineer to G-wIVEY triE CceS'E of constructic-n c-f improvementse
c'Dnstrijction certifiication, "As Bi_tilt" plans and monumentinq
the street centerlines shall be filed with the Ccii_tnty
L-nqineero
L-1 1 That apprc-priate prova.sion be made that the fo11owinq
described property be field in triAst Ltntil the continuation
of tl-ie streets be dedicated or deededa A 1 ft. strip at the
ends .--Ir edqes of a1 I Streets that terminate or border tI-ie
plat boundary. (Temp-Drary ci_il dP sacs are required wheri
streets terminate at the plat boundaries< )
E 1;=' T i-~ e app 1 i c G~ rit a t-~ -Di_t1 d be ad v i sed th.-At i r7 di vici i_ta 1 d -r-i. v e w a y
access permits are r-eqLtired pricnr to issi_iance cif a bl_tilciinq
permit for driveway appyrclaches t-D the r-Dunty rc-ad system. .
E 1 J Dedicatic-In of v_.fee1; of additic-nal. Rit7ht--r-If-Way aloncl
F=c-i_~rth Avenf_tN.
E:l Dedicatic-n o# 5 fee1: cl-f additiorial Riqht .::.f W(=-ky alonq L-::_'n9
R~-~ad .
E 1~; Ex- i_; t i. ri cl C-D u n ty r- .-Da d s p r c, v i d i r i q ci i re c t ~.1 c ce s s tc- t h e p 1 a-t
s-I-~al1 be paved i_ind/or- ci_irhed t~~~ ~pokane Gc-unty standards.
E 1 i -f hat a1 1 pi_tb:I. i c rr_--ads Within tr~ e F-):L -mkt bE--- c:l esi G n e cl Ekn cl
ccin str I_icted to Spc-kane County standarcJs.
El 'D Ti°I C2 Wr:~ Y' Cj "app1 1 C ci fl t" a f'icl ll 1 1`i C: lUde tfl C? clW fl E I'' coY' clW fl eY r=i cif
thF? P1''operty9 h:Lsa heli'sy ~.~sS.1CaC1S afld 5I_lCCes'-acoYs.
~~~23' "rhe C~-unty Enqineeir h<-~~-) detaicinated Typica:l Rcl<aciway 5ectic-In
lUurnber Two..._Local_Aci:~ss. s•l:aridarc:1 •f-Dr ti-ie iml-Dr-civement of a1_].
inter-nal -~si:ree{:s wl-ii.ci-+ is to be cc-nstri_tcted within tFie
Fa ro r~ i:-. e d de v e 1c- p) m e ri t e -ff-iis w.i.1 1 reyUirEry t he i n st a 1 1at ion r-If
,.~''.i 6 t: . f S ~7 fl ci 1 . T l"I G.' C ! ~ I"1 Y ~_l (_~:1 1'1 C ~_t 1''~:)1 fi 1 S a~. S
YequlYPCj.
. L
r
Pa CiE?
L.*.2'4 '1"hc• C~ ~,_tnty Engineer I-~~s dcsiqriateci 1'YRi cal Rcladway Seet i.c-i1
Nu(Tlbe1'' ACCes..~a stal"1dc-lY'd f-Dr thE' 'lfTip1''i Ovement of
L11n_q._R~8 _r-ad Which is acl.jacent tc- the propc -sed develc -pment.
This wiX:l rer.auire the aclclitic-i~ ---If approximate7.y 911 fte ofi
aspha1 t a1c-ng tl-iP fir.-jntaqe -Df the devel.----pment. The `
Cof15 t1'' uCt1. o11 of Cl_t Yb1 I"1 Q 1 s c7 ~~-D 1`' G qi_t 1 Y E' d.
E24 The County Enqineer has desiqnated Typical Roaciway Section
hlumber 7wo,L_L29a1~AC CEa55 standard for the improvement of
1=ourth_Aveni_te whi ch~is~ad.jacent tc- the priDpozised
development. This will reqi_tire tl-ie additicin of
approximately 18_feet_fr-Dm_cen-terline of asphalt al----nq the
frc-ntaqe of theTdevelopment. ~the~construc1:ion c-f c►_irbinq is
' ~ a1so reqLtired.
The prc:~pc~aed p]. at afial be improved to the starfdards set
foY t h 1 I"~ Spoka1') e Cc-i_t f'i t y E' -J a1` tj c-'f Com m iss ion e rs R-C'' Sc-1ut1ot'1
nlo. 80-1592, as amendeciq wl-iich establist•tes reqfA1ati.cina for
YoadS y ar3 pY" oaC I'ieS, d rai n a ye an d f e e s i n f 1 eW CoI'1 struCtloI"1 e
F%3 3 TI°ip- CCII.Anty EnqineEr has examirted triis development proposal
and I-iaa deter-mined tr~at tl-ip- impact of i;his prop~ is-al upon tl-ie
exi. st.i.riq County Road System warrants the dedir_atir-In of
~.~dditiont-0. Riqht of Way and tl-~e rcnadway impr-,---vements fiercin
apeci.f-Let1.
Ev~ T'hiS plat i-or deve1opmEnt pr-~~posal is located witt-iin ~-i
r-~,in::~ i~~~sii~ wl-~ir~-~ -~as heen identified by the ~::ane
~ ~ywEngin~ers Of f i ce as havinq stormwat _--r"►_in--- f fi
('J Y C- b S. ~ S 1 fl C E? th1..~'~ C> lat o1'' deV(? 11:--;o 5
affeC tC-? l= In 1'' '1 S c3 ` ~-I I-1 'f Y 1. b ! ! t 1~ s _vr fTl W cZ te1'' ! ~ W r=i q
prciaaerty ownL sh---.i_tld partic- ~ at in the planniilU <zind
1ffip 1 efTleI`1tatl-aIC1 c- f i_1t i_lr c'A f1W1.dE c'i'toY'R1Water man`qement
s ystem. T he fo1 1.-Dw i i1 t: - ~ rn e nt , h<z l1 be p1 C~ ce-ci i n the p1at
cJ e cl i c: a t i. n: " Th . (-t ij W nEl ~I r i_t c c C? ss .MI r( E, ) i ri i. nt e r E' s t
aqrce to .jI_1' in ny Caurity ~.pprd St-Drmwater- I"IanaqeiTiLnt
F'roqra ~ nd t-D p;ay sLtct-i rates <=-knd r_ha _ iTiay be fixed
thr_ _t(]h public hearinqs for servir_e -_,r ben ----t3tained by
-hc- p 1 a n n i n q y des i gn q const; ructi n q, m ain fiai n.i. ri g ~ e ra n
of 5tctYfT1Watelr Coi'1tlrol faC.7,. lJ..t.a..C-?4.7.
E'3C-) T h~.~ app1 i. cant shou1 d be adv isca ei t t-iat t he re may exi c, t
1_t t i]. i t i n<.a ei t I-ier un d er p~.-Jui7 dc-rciv e r heaci af f E cti n ci the
app:l.icanta pr._Ipertyy, ir}c:Yi_tdirig pr-.aIperty t---:l be cled.i.c~:.~ted cor
set aszde f.--Ir fi_tti-tre acquisition. Spol::~.ane Cclunty Wii i
cA Ssuf Tl e f lc-~ "fl I"1 aI-1 C 1 c'1 ~ ---.b 1 i qat i-:---n~-DY' adjll St(Tl eIl t5 -----1`' 1'' E? 1c-Cat1of l
recaarcJiiiq tl-iese i_ttilitiES. TI-ie applicant shco!!ld check: witi-i
1--) et g
t h e ~-i p i c <_A b e 1_t L a. l a. t r=i p c. i•:: C i_t n t y E r i (--1:i r`i t= ee'
c1etEi-ma.ne Whether thcm or i_ttili.ty is irc~sp----risa bl.e
f----r ~--Aci.justment or re1-Dcatir-In costs and tr-l make ar rangemeni.s
f-_-r any necessary wiµ#ra:: .
5pecial Cr-Inditionso
Both 5th and 6th Aveni_te sl-ia11 cr-Intinue t~ - the ezstern edqe of
the proposed p].at, with a 1foot dedication at the eas{:eri-i
termini_isa Ci_t1-cle-sac desiqn and dedicatic-n should reflECt this
continuation of 5th and 6th Avei7i_te
~ .
APPLICA.T'Zt~,4 A.CCEPT.A.rICE AN7J DESIGN REVXEW
SPOKANE COtTNTX PLATINZNG DEPA.RTNxENT
Date:
Deparnnent: ~ ~ • . .
Department Contact Person:
Application Number: ~
Action: -(2a
~ -
APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING:
from 2:30 to 2:50 at the Planning DeDartment
ote: . The following information is to pzovide the proposal sponsor with primary agency
comments to assist- the sponsor and aid the processing of public hearing items heard before
the Hearing Examiner Committee. 'rhe.following informaaon does not provide a complete
or binding final review of the proposa]. This will occur only after the* proposal is accepted
and placed on the Public Hearing Agenda. The acceatance of the awlic&tion md
5che.duline of the aWliGa.don on the Public Hearing Agenda is the pnmary function of this
meeting. A secondary function of this meeting is to provide a prelimin~r r review of chg
gpnlication. This will provide a forum for the sponsor and other departments of what to
expect as standard development conditions and design recommendations.
The comments received are based on a prel.inu.nary revievcr of the application form and site plan by the Departments and Agencies which have been circulated the infonmation (not all
agencies/departments have been contacted--only those who have been deternuned to have .
primary interest. - 1. a. Does the application (or can the developmerit) meet requirements to be placed
on the Public Hearing Agenda? YES ❑.NO
b. If no, what is lacking? c. What requirements have not been met? 2. After a preliminarv review of the aMlicadon what''Conditions of Approval" would
be required of the develogment? (Attach condidons if necessary)
. ~
. ~
v
,
3. Department Recommendations: , .
4. Additionallnformation:
1
f
OFF:[ t_:E C1F TWL C'.C]UhlTY L;lur T hlEEfl'~
SPOF::I`~IVE COUNT1lr WA5HINGT01y
MG~ ~ ch 4y 1 '34 '-9 i
1-Q: Spokane C~~-uni:,y f'lznna.nq Depari:ment (Cl_trrent P1ani-iii-iq
Arimi.ni st ra tor )
FROMo Spok:ane Cc-unty Enqineers Department Y6.:k-kk
aUBJ; Si_ibclivisi-Dn Londitic-n s, Name Hitchcocl-_'s__:'nd~Add.
hlLtmber UnaSsigned_
re: 5l_tbdivision5
TFie fol lowiny "Conditions of Approval" for tl-ie zbc-ve referer•iced
subdivision are submitted to the 5poE;ane Coi_tni:y I'lanriii-iq
Departmerit fc-r inclusicin in tVie Desiqn Review Mcetinq achedLtleci
MaY cr~~ ~ ~ ~~~922a
E i -rhe conditional appr-_Ival ofi the plat is qYVen by the C~-Ltnty
FnUi.nee-r sub.ject t---j deciication -=If riqht-o•F-way and approva1
cli the road system as indicateci in tVie preliminary pl~.~t of
reeorda
F.,_ Thc-1 t p1 cl I-15 y P Yc-f 1le5 ci fl d C YoS 5 5 E? C t 1ofl S c3 5 de51 Q fl ed to
County standards shc-wincl prc~pc-sed str~et center 1 ine and c+_trb
qr-ades be sl_tbmit-tera tcl the County Engineer for apprc~val
pr-ior t---- construct.ion anci/or- the filinp ►.--,-f a final. Rl~~t.:y
roacJ p 1ans -t c- be pre parec1 i_tn cJer t t-ie cl i rec t i-Dn c-fa 1 i cense d
a'rc-fewai.onal Ci.vi.l Enqineern
E' "fhat drai.naqe plans and clesiqn ca1 culatiorilB C,hCowincl the
ali(anment -_,f drainage -fa-riJ.ities be submitted to tVie County
Ef l Q 1 f'1 k::' @ 1'' ~-DY c~ ppYciVal p1'' 1. oI' tce Co(l StY" u(:: j:. 1of 1 c.~. nf~ ~--.,Y the
filiiira ~--.f tVie f.i nt~1 pl.al:e Drain~.~qe plans tcl be pr`pa~~d
uflCih_?Y' t riE' i:I1.1-eCt:1.-r-C'1 ~~of c! l1 C:E?t-ir'ied PY4f essic-rizA:l. C]. V 1 1
.
EI"1QZCleelr.
E5) Ccii-i,_Struc t ion w itha. n fi h e p r- _~-pose d pi_iG 7. i c. G' -t, r- eets a n d
easemeni:s sha1. b~~ pc.~-rf.-Drmed i_tnder tVie clirec:t supervisir-In of
cl l1. l= F' nr-+ eCi e ri cii neer 1'a i. ! 1`' V E? yi: iY q W i"ii-i Sha~l fu1' n1 f'y F~ tV~ e C'c'Uf lty
E I"1 C] 11`1 i? C.' 'r w i t I-i ^"As i_ti 1t" p]. ans an d a cert i f:i cat e i n w r iti i-ici
i:hat ~:.k1. :i. i.mpr.-Dvements wzre :.i.nsta7. leci t:c- the 1 ines ai-ici grades
s hclw n cdri tf ie app rcived r_ r-oi-~ -struc: t ion p 1ans an d t hat 21 l
d:i.sti.lr-hecJ mr-Inument a have been replaced.
pa a e
EG hl -D r_ onst rurW t7ori wc-lr k: is t-D be per for med w itvii i-I t I-~ e exi s t i. i1 r.a
'Dr j_-)r~~pr-sed f' ubl.i. c i; i q ht--of- Wayi_tritil a perm i t has be en
issi_ted by i:he County EnUineer. A11 w-Dr-E: is ,ub.ject tcl
inspecti.c-n arid appr~Dva.:l by the C:.:.o..tnty F'nUineero
E 7A11 cc-nsi:r-i_ic_ti-Dn within the existinq cjr prc-p-Dsed I'i_tblic Riqht-of-Way i5 tr-I be completed pri.or tc- filinq the fina1
plat or a b-Dnd in the amount @stimated by the Coi_tnty
Enqineei' to C-DVE'Y trie Cc-iSt of c-DnstrLtctic-n of improvements.
construction certification, "As Di_ti 1 t" plans and monumentinq
thE street centerlines shall be filed with the County
EnQineero
E1 1 That appropriate provi.sion be made that -the fo1 1owinq
described property be held in trust i_ti-itil the contini_tatic-n
of the streets be dedicated or deededo A 1 ft. strip at the
end5 or edqes of a1 1 streets that terminste -::-r border the
plat boundary. ~Temporary cLtI d~ scies are reqLtir-ed when
streets terminate at the plat boLtndaries. ?
E iTt-~e appli.cant shou1d be advised tha-r, incJividual dir:i.veway
acc_ess permits are reyl_iired pricir to issi_tance of a bi_til.dinq
pE?1`"(Tll~ fol`' dY1VeWc~)'' c1P{]1'oaChea tc-I thE? Couflt)/ 1''c-ad 5yc=►teflla ,
E1^ Dcdication of i feet -r-f additic-naa. Right--:-f-Way alonq
fi .-Jur t h fi, v en i_i e,
E13' Dedi caticin oi,C..; i eet of addition~.~l Riqht of Way zk1onG Lc-ng
rcnad.
E16 Fxi.stinca Cc-i_inty rclads prcividing direct access to the plcit
SI-iaI 1 be paved and/cIr- ci_trbed t-D Spok:ane County stLanciarcisn
E 1:' 7 I-i.-At~.~ 1 1 publ a. i: r~ -Dads w ithi n -t i-► e ra 1at be c.1 esi 4 riEa cl an d
constructed tiD SpoE:ane County standarrls.
EVD T hG W c-1'' d "ci {:7 F7 l1 C G:1 fl t" shci ll 1 fl C: lude the coW nE' Y i -1'' CeW fl eY ..~-a ~~if
tll E? p 1`' o(J C? Y"tyy hZs, 1"i E 1 Y s, asS 1 Q i"t s a11 Cj 5uC G(? 5 SoY 5.
k~~ 23 -rhe C:c-unty Fngineer has clesi.qnated `rypi c~.~l Rc-adway Sectir-In
IVumber Tw-_--,__laC,cai_Access standard fi-Dr the impr----vement -Df all.,
ii-iternal^si:r=Pi:srwFiich~is tc- be, cr-Instructed within tl-i~-~
pr~~~pciseci~r.ieve'1~~-pmpnt. Ttiis wi.l. reqi.,ta.re the instal lation of
36 f{:. -z-f ~.~sphal t. TI-ie conatruction .--If ci_trbinq i s a1sc-
reqi_ti red .
,
p <--A i;I e ~
E2A• The Cc-iunty Cnqa..neer has desiqnated Typi c,_-Al R-Dadway aect:ic-In
hli..trri t~e r Tw_1..ocal__~c~~~s st~-inc1~7r-cJ fe-Ir tr~e impr~~vemer~t ~~f
L~ ~nq_Roac! which~is ad.jacent tr-1 the pr-W~pr-lsed developmento
This wil.l require the addi.tion appr-r-axi.matzly 9-11 -ft. c-fi
aspha1t along the frontaq~ ---If tl-ie cJevplopmenta TI-ie~
Cc-I"1 St1`' i_l Ct1c-('1 of Cl_I Y t] .1. I°l Q 1s cZ Y 5cl Y' equ1 Y E d.
E24 1-he C-Di_tnty Enqineer has de5iqnated Typical Roadway Section
Number Two.,_Lor_al_AcceSS standard for the improvement c-f
F-Durth_Aveniie whichris ad.jacent tc- the proposed
dEVeJ.-Dpment. r This wil l reqLtire the additic-n of
appr-Dximately 18_feet_frc-m_centerl.ine ----f asphalt alc-nq the
frontaqe ofi the'developmenta r tl-ie ccnnstruction c-f cLtrbinq is
' ~ a1so required.
EZ3 The pr~~~~Dosed p1at shall be imp~-Dvecl tc- tVie standards set
fo1'' hi l 1"1 Sp~~-kcl fl-'' Coun t y Bc-ci Y' Cj c-f Com m i s s iofl E 1r S ReSolut1o17
No. e(_)-159:'q as amcnded, whi.ch establist-ie5 requ1atic-ns fior
roads9 apprclachcs, drainage and fees i.n new ci-nnsi:ructic.n<
E The Gco..inty Eriqinee-r hs<.~ examiripri tri is devel-z-pmp-rit pr~ ~~~~~sa1.
a ri d has d e t e rmi ned t hai; t i-ie i m pac t thi s p ropos a]. upcnn t I-ic
e-:istincl County Road System warrarits the dedication -W-fi
additional. Fiicaht of Way and thc- r~ ~adway impr-z-vements I-~erein
specif.i.edo
E3 4 T'his plat .--Ir devPlopment pr~ ~posal is located within
drtaai.nc-iqe I~as.i_n wi-iirt•i I-jas L~een a~d~~nt~ificd by tFie Sp._.I.::ane
~G~~-i_trity~lCriqYnee-r-s Of f ice a=> havi.nq stc-Irmwater- ri_tnc-f f
pr--:---hlems. S-Dince this pl.at c-r development propc.sal is
asfected by is cc-Intrikyutor tcl stc-rmwater f 1owsp
prciperty clwners si-~~~lu1d partxeipate in tfie plai-ii-iing t=_krid
implement~~i.:7_c-Ir7 .-Df a fl_t-ti_tre i7asinwi.cle atcermwater iilanac7ement
sysi:.em. The frjl. 1.owinc~ ~~atement sh<--A1 l be placed in the. p1at
ded1.C.:c.~t1.ofle "That tf'le oWfiE'Y (.s) cl1'' SuCCE's5-D1' (5 ) ifl 1.f1te1''w'"st
aqrce t---- .join in any C-Dunty apprcived St.-Jrmwater- Manae:iement
F'rr-smram zknd t-:-- pay sueh rates and charqes as m~~y be fixed
t I-~ rc-ugh pub1.i c hP a r i n qs f-Dr s e r vice c-r ben e f it cibtai. ri ed la y
tf'I E' plaf1('11 f1 Q y C.~ er:; '1 q1`l y C i=-nStt" i_! Ct1 fl q, (T'1 a:1 fl ta1 fl 1 fl ---,Y c-(:1 C-' Y' c:l tx. cifl
ci'f 5tcI1'ff1Wa1re'tr cof1tYo1 faCilit1.es. "
E9C_) T he app1. i cant sh.:~-u1 d be a d v ised t hat t hP r e m a y exist
util.ities F'.itl-ier underground or- coviarheaci affieCt.inU ti-ie
aPp1 i c a ri •t s pr~ ~~iper t y y i ricli_tdx riq p rop E= r t y to b e deci a. cated
set aside f.--.r ~~iti-tre arqui.si..tion. SprjE::~.~ne Ccounty wi l1
Y
c s r~ ~_t f Tl C t-i ~ w- f1~'1 c'~ I~ i C 1 c~ l ~~b1 i qati~~-n i~~- Y' a d_ jt_c st m e n ts
reqarcIinq tf-~~~e util.itiean The a~.~plicaiit shc-uld Cr~~ck With
~ , .
Fi c7 g (D
t I°~ e a p 1:3 1 i c_ L•) 1 ee 1-i t- i 1 i t Les a n d C~ I•:: r7 e C; -W- i..t n t v C n g i ne e r- t
e_i ete rrn i ne w t~~ ett•ier t r~ zkpp7. i r_ an t: oir ut: i. li•f yis r~spr-Ins.i_ b.l e
f oY ad.j~_~stment !_~Y' i''~?I-WiCt:~tloi-1 C~~~~ts af1d t:.z. rnak:e ~~Y1`'aflgE?fTlf:'I-lts
fc-ir c.~ny rleCCSsaY'y Wo1'k.
Special Conditic-inso
Bc-tl-i 5tri and 6th Aven►_!e shal1 continue t~~. the easteirn Pdqe of
tt-ie pr-:-p-=-sed plat, witl-i a 1 foot dPdication at the eastern
terminusp Ci_il -de-sac desiqn and dedicatic-ri sh~~luld reflect tl-iis
continLtation of 5th and Eth Aveni_te
CURRENT & PROJECTED TRAFFIC COUNTS 1
Station # 4130
BARKER RD BARKER RD
RD # 0230 NORTH RD # 0230 SOUTH
05/09/88 - 21563 05/09/88 - 21003 "
CURRENT - 2,973 CURRENT - 2,324
+ 5 YRS - 3,617 + 5 YRS - 2,828
+ 15 YRS - 51354 + 15 YRS - 41186
. + 20 YRS - 61515 + 20 YRS - 51093
SPRAGUE AVE SPRAGUE AVE
RD # 4538 EAST RD # 4538 WEST
05/09/88 - 21211 05/09/88 - 11998
CURRENT - 21565 CURRENT - 2,318
+ 5 YRS - 3,120 + 5 YRS - 2,821
+ 15 YRS - 41619 + 15 YRS - 41175
+ 20 YRS - 5,619 + 20 YRS - 51080
These counts are seasonally adjusted by group mean factors.
Projected counts are calculated at 4% per year.
Press <Return> to continue. PF16 to Exit.
CURRENT & PROJECTED TRAFFIC COUNTS 1
Station # 4206
BARKER RD BARKER RD
RD # 0230 NORTH RD # 0230 SOUTH
07/16/86 - 775 07/16/86 - 499.
CURRENT - 966 CURRENT - 622
+ 5 YRS - 11175 + 5 YRS - 757
+ 15 YRS - 1,739 + 15 YRS - 1,121
+ 20 YRS - 2,116 + 20 YRS - 11363
STH AVE 8TH AVE
RD # 5868 EAST RD # 5868 WEST
07/16/86 - 322 CURRENT - 401
+ 5 YRS - 489
+ 15 YRS - 723
+ 20 YRS - 879
These counts are seasonally adjusted by group mean factors.
Projected counts are calculated at 4% per year.
Press <Return> to continue. PF16 to Exit.
EASYDISP V1.01 - ROAD SEGMENT INFORMATION 1
Road Number: 2579 - LONG RD
Start MP: 00.15 Function Class: Local Access
Ending MP: 00.28 Rural/Urban: Urban
Federal Route
Pavement Shoulders
Type: Low Type Bituminous Type: None
Width (Feet) : 18 Left (Feet) : 00
# of Lanes : 02 Right ( Feet) : 00
Medians General Information
Type: None Curbs: None
Width (Feet): Sidewalks: None
PF5 to List Road Intersections.
PF15 to Enter new Segment.
PF16 To Enter new Road.
EASYDISP V1.01 - ROAD SEGMENT INFORMATION 1
Road Number: 5835 - 4TH AV
Start MP: 00.00 Function Class: Local Access
Ending MP: 00.13 Rural/Urban: Urban
Federal Route
Pavement Shn•slders
Type: Asphalt Type: None
Width (Feet) : 27 Left (Feet) : 00
# of Lanes : 02 Right ( Feet) : 00 Medians General Information
Type: None _ Curbs: None
Width (Feet): Sidewalks: None
PF5 to List Road Intersections.
PF15 to Enter new Segment.
PF16 To Enter new Road.
EASYDISP V1.01 - ROAD SEGMEIdT INFORMATION 1
Road Number: 5835 - 4TH AV
Start MP: 00.13 Function Class: Local Access
Endinq MP: 04.50 Rural/Urban: Urban
Federal Route
Pavement Shoulders
Type: Asphalt Type: None
Width (Feet) : 16 Left (Feet) : 00
# of Lanes: 02 , Right (Feet): 00
Medians General Information
Type: None Curbs: None
Width (Feet): Sidewalks: None
PF5 to List Road Intersections.
PF15 to Enter new Segment.
PF16 To Enter new Road.
•
r
r:ss•'r;,~.::::
~:'i,~zr~ ^:i.I :i'.i - ~K~:':'.:'::,L:':
~i,::'~:~~~:: 3:.: . ~:.c-.Lr•~'..,.~::.
:ii'rl
• '.J 'r.~ _ ~
}x. ~ . • I
~t '
~~r~tl., ,.C?5i-~:~ ~•ir'2'_^ `!~e": , / ~
~~~i-~
_ ' t ty " . : '
~S~ ~ a• ~e~," i I
}'.-•'_:>'~'c,'r:'^'::'-
.j...l~s'f~ ~ i 'S~ic ia:'-c•:': :i•!:~.~%_'
'~-i' •~.~X~'• ~y• . .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET
'i ~ ~ ~ . . .
PHONE 456-2205
~'`j'~'•`'`•~'i;. .:°>i,.. ..rr , ~,'tidt:k~.-:rfi;'~.,xr':'s: ? `r~VA SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
" •y '!.c, eplt?Jf.%. .~s+ VVi 6 •
:i.,:•..t~~t~-t°•~.. :i.' ~ V~~ +
SPOKANE COUnTY GOURT MOUSE
f
• ; , , ,
. - , ~ • ~i •
MEMORANDUM
~
.
TO: - '
Bill Wedlake, Spokane County Utilities Department ~
Steve Holderby, Spokane Counry Health Districi
Tom Davis, Spokane County Division of Buildirigs
Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recrearion Department
Ted Trepanier, Department of Trans ortarion '
~
FROM: Paul F. Jensen, Senior Planner
1
DATE: February 18, 1992
i
RE: Preliminary Plat for Hitchcock 2nd Addition (name subject to change),
applicant - Theron Hitchcock ~
~
APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING
MARC,H 4. 1992 3:15 ~
-CnUgY PL I HEARINC ROQM
~
Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND
DESIGN REVIEW MEETNG FORM for your comments. The Planning Department
' encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representarive have been
invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the 3.;
attached form to Tim Lawhead for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION
ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the, sponsor at the meeting and
included in the Planning Department file (so bring thrgg copies to the meeting). Thanks ~
for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Tim
Lawhead of the Planning Department at 456-2205. '
c: Theron Hitchcock, E. 13310 13th Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99216
~
Art Noll, E. 13423 32nd Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99216 ~
Eugene H. Welborn, E. 7011 2nd Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99212
Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Application Form, Site Plan
~
i j
PLANNING DEPAR-TMENt
.
1 ~ .
. - M. . , . . .
S"OMawC [OV+I, COVNT rOYfC
PRELITVIINA.RY SUBDIVISION APPLICA.TICJN
PART I
A . ~'TF,NFR a1, YNrn12MA TY(~~
NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: TbPrc)n Hi tchcock / Arthur Noll
MAILING ADDRESS: -E. 1-14-23 :32n d . &ve .
CITY: Spokane STATE: Wash. ZYp: 99216
' PHONE: 9 2 6-15 61 (work) 9 2 6-15 61 (home)
IF APPLYCANT IS NOT OWNER, TNCLUDE tiVRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESFNTATIVE.
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Theron Hitchcock , pHpNE: 924-3327
M AII.ING ADDRES S: _ E. 13 310 13th. Ave,•
CITY: Spokane STATE: Wa sh . ZIP: 99216 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 8.82 a c r e s
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) none
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECTiPROPOSAL g51 c)1_ nh 1? & 59 ~ 91 . 0 61 1
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT A.REA OWNED OR CONTRQLLED None
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL _E _ Lg,gQ a 4-+,h _ ~ •TA
EXISTIING ZONE CLASSIFICATI0N(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) TTR '1_ 5
EXISTINGUSEOFPROPERTY twn cjj3g_LP fami lzr rom G. and acant
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY URBAN
SCHOOL DISTRICT C:entral Valley School District N0. 356
FIRE DISTRICT SPokane County Dist.# 1 WATER PURVEYOR C.I.D . No,. 19
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Single family dwellings (X) Duplexes Mul[ifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( }
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
pax-P aMa r Q Q-f _ .
B. LEC A.L INFnRMATION: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SnuthPa~t r_nrner of 4±h and Lona 1
~ .
SECTION 19 TOWAtSHIP 25 RANGE 45 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVTDING ACCESS: A:~L Aue_
WiDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTTNG ON PUnLIC ROAD:63-Q 1 on 4th & 610' on Lona
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN A.RTERIAL OR PLANNED,ARTERIAL O YES W NO
NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS R-0-t-~ rr 1iGa r3o
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTTRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMLNARY SUBDNISION
MAP.
. ' .
t
Si(JBDIVISION APPLICATZON Page 2 of 4
TF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? Real Estate
Sales Agreement ( Copy Attached )
WHAT ARE TIM CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Urban designation under the Spokane Coimty Comprehensive
Land Use Plan; Zoning Desimation as UR 3.5
WHAT IMPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON T'HE AD ACENT PRQPERTIES-7
All of the adjacent properties are also Zoned UR 3.5 1 see EnvuromentcU Checklist)
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? ProPosal is within the P.S.S.A.
consistant with both current Zoning and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO Iv1ITIGATE YOUR PI20POSAL'S IMPACT N
SURROUNDTNG LAND USE? As the adjacent Zones are also UR 3.5, t ere are ~
no uniaue measures proposed to mitijzate conflicting land uses.
C. PRELIMINARY SYIBDIVISZnN CYEiVERAL YNFORMATxON:
,
~ . .
NUMBER OF LOTS: 29 GROSS AREA: 8.82 acres
{ TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 109400 sq. feet pROPOSED NET DENSITY*: 4.0 units/ acre
SMALLEST LOT SIZE: 10,400 sq. feet MINIlvNM FRONTAGE: 100 feet PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: Individual wells Public system ~ Privace Community System
0 ther ( ) - Describe: °
PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DZSPOSAL: .
Public sewcr O Community system O Septic tank and drainfield ~ Double Plumbing (XK Dry SEwer ~ Other
Describe:
UTILITY COMPANMS ANll/OR DISTRTCTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL:
ElecLricity: Washlngton Water Pawer n Sewer: SPokane CountY Utilities DePt.
' Gas: Washinp-ton Water Powgzter; C.I.D. #19 Phone: P•N.W.B.
DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY
PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS
PROPOSAL? Yes No ?1x) IF YES, EXPLAIN:
D. PRELZMZNARY STJBDI'VZSInN IMPRn,VEMENT INFnRMA.TInN:
LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads
Public roads (XK Arterial roads Tract X roads
DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE:
. ~
ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: ,
Spring of 1993
IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes O No ~
IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION IyIAP.
IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schaols, etc.)? Yes O No*~
IF YES, DESCRIBE:
* NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLTC ROAD AREA.
. ' ,
SUBDIVZSZON APPLICATION . Page 3 of 4
PAR'T H
THIS SECT70N OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WTTH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROFOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TU T'HE PLANNTNG DEPARTMENT.
FXRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A. TIJIS PROPOS AL IS WITHIN FTRE PROTECTIO NO.
B. ,0ADEQUATE ARRANGENIENTS (HAVE) HAVE NOT BEEN MA,DE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER STEM AND.FACILTTIES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION PURPOSES. ~
C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFMTIVE; ANll WII..L BE DETERMINED AT BULLDING PERMIT
b.. ~
D. REQ ILTIRE zMENTS IN LUDE: A
D(W Gc--dr I vr-R31*
~
FIRE D&RICT ~ SIGNATURE/rITLE DATE
WATER PURVEYOR
.
A. S ATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS F F.S~'IC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (~iAVE) HA'VE NOT BEEN MADE.
/ . B. REQUIREMENFS/COMMENTS:
v
~~$olr ~r4 7~O ~~5~ ' l:~a~i~' . oZ~j/~~ 2
WATER DISTRICT SItNAT ITLE `o DATE
C OUNTY EN GINE EZt ' A PRELI1v1INARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE A.i1'D GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCt7SSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
. / !
~
ol
SIGNATURE I E DATE •
COUNTY U'1'ILITIES
A P12.ELINIINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND CENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (TrA~~' (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED •
WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS '
A. COMMENTS: 4
Y-//~i/~~z-~/ ~
SIGNATUREjTITLE DATE
HEAL1'H DIS'Z'RIC'I' A PRELIMIINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) QrAVE NO BEEN SATISFIED. ,
A. COMMENTS:
S.
v SIGNATUREMTLE n l DA
SEWER PUI2VEYOZ2
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. .
A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TYTLE DA1'E
.
, . r
SUBDIVISZON APPLYCAT70N Page 4 of 4
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEY4R, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION
~ HE LEGAL DESCRZPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR
VISTON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOK:ANE COUNTY
ON REG A-ATIONS AND WS STATE OF WASHINGTON.
.
.
~ •
*I *D DATE:
.
CI; 150 D PHONE.
D/ ` zIP:
° Fcr E~~? ~
CAIV0
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDLR PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE
MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OVVNER OF. RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE
PREVIOUSLY TDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS
WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS 4N HIS/HER BEHALF.
SIGNED: Theron Hitchcock DATE: February 10 ,-1992
ADDRESS: E. 13310 13th. Ave. PHONE: 924-3327
Spokane, Washington 99216 ZIp; 99216
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SIGNED AND SWORN TO/AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
February , 1992, BY Theron Hitchcock
NOTARY SEA:,
Notary Public in and for the Stat ashi gton
12esiding at Spokane , Washingt n _
{
My appointment expires: June 18s 1992
PART V
(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUBMITTED:
DATE ACCEPTED: BY:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT .
' . 4
.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
r
YIO•( fOVt.C0V1.OVft
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
_ PART I
A . GFNFRAT, YNrnR TV~T1'n~L-
NAME OF A.PPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Theron ui tchcock f ArthLr Nol l
MAILING ADDRESS: _F. l -3 12nd. Ave .
CITY: Spokane STATE: Wash. , ZIp: 99216
PHONE: 9 2 6-15 61 (work) 9 2 6-15 61 (home) .
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION '
FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE.
9
LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Theron fiitchcock pHpNE: 924-3327
MAII.ING ADDRESS: _ E. 13310 13th. Ave. .
CITY: Spokane S TAT'E: W a s h. ZIp; 9 9 Z 16 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) 8.82 a c r e s
ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) n o n e
ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL c;91 91 . 0F 1 2 f. 5 5 l 91 .()61 1
ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED None
STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL -E_ 1-9" a 44h a r~
EXISTTNG ZONE CLASSIFTCATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) TTR 11 . 5
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY t tan si n rr i A f a m i 1 v h nm s, a n d va _ a n t
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY URBAN
SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley School District N0. 356
.
FIRE DISTRICT SPokane County Dist. #1 WATER PURVEYOR C.I.D. No,. 19
PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY:
Singlc family dwellings (X) Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other ( ) - Describe:
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS IlWOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
Dlan.- . t ha t w e rA a ta a r P q-f .
B. LECYAL INFnRMATInN:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SnnthPa st corner of 4th and Lonct
SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 45
NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS:
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD:63D I on 4th 610' on Lonct
DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL YES (X) NO
NAME(S) OF A.RTERIAL ROADS ngt arr, ab, o
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descripcion stamped by Land Suryeyor). INCLUDE
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
MAP. ~ r
. ...k~`
3■Ir.F -
SUBDiVISION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4
.
IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? Real Estate
Sales Agreement ( Copy Attached )
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS QF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS
PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Urban designatian under the Spokane Cowlty Comprehensive
Land Use Plan; Zoniniz DesiRnation as UR 3.5 ,
WHAT IMPACT WII,L THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE AD ACENT PRQPERI'IES9
All of the adiacent proper'ties are also Zoned UR 3.5 ~ see Envi.romentcU Checklist)
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? ProPosal is within the P.S.S.A.
consistant with both current Zoning and the Camprehensive Land Use Plan.
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT
SURROUNDING LAND USE? As the adjacent Zones are also UR 3.5, tl~ere are
no uniaue measures proDosed to mitieate conflicting land uses.
C. PRELIMINARY SZJBDYVISInN CENERAL INFnRMATYON;
NUMBER OF LOTS: 29 GROSS AREA: 8.82 acres
TYPICAL LOT SIZE: 10,400 sq. feet pROPOSED NET DENSTTY*: 4.0 units/ acre
SMALLEST LOT SIZE: 10,400 sq. feet MBIIMUM FRONTAGE: 100 feet PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER:
Individual wells Public system ~ Private Community System
Other ( ) - Describe: .
,
PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: .
Public sewer Community system Septic tank and drainfield ~f
Double Plumbing (x;( Dry Sewer Jz~ Other
Describe: .
UTILITY COMPANLES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIl?E SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL:
ElecUicity: Washington Water Power n Sewer. Spokane County Utilities Dept.
Gas: Washing-ton Water Powwzter C.I.D. #19 Phone: P•N•W.B.
DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY
PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS
PROPOSAL? Yes No ~X) IF YES, EXPLAIN:
D. PRELYMINARY SUBDZVISInN IMPR(?VEMFNT YNFnRMATYnN:
LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads
Public roads (xy- Arterial roads Tract X roads
DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATTON OF ABOVE: .
ESTIMAT'ED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DfiVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION:
Spring of 1993
IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes No ~
IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP.
IS DEDICATION 4F LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Yes O No"
IF YES, DESCRIBE: ,
* NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA. ~ ,
- •
~
SUBDNISION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 '
PART II
THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH
WRITTEN VERIFICATTON THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE
AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. 1ZESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED
IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FYRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRTCT NO.
I3. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS
IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND.FACILTTIES FOR FIlZE
PROTECTION PURPOSES.
C. RECONIlvfENDED FIRE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW
BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUII..DING PERMIT
APPLICATION TIME.
D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE:
FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE
,
WATER PURVEYOR
A. S ATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS F STIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW
REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) HAVE NO BEEN MADE.
.
B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: 114rg5e- W~ r7 4
il A r
WATER DISTRICT Asi NATUR ITI.E v DATE ,
C OUNTY EN GINEER
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR ROADS
AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS: ~
~r
4T Z_
SIGIVATUREfrkll DATE
COUN1'Y U1'ILITIES
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAI. OF THIS PROFOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNA'1ED
WATER PURWEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ,
HEALTH DISTRTCT
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIlZEMENTS FOR
SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. .
A. COMMENTS:
SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE .
SEWER PURVEYOR
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FOR THE
PROVISION 4F PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT.
A. COMMENTS:
° SIGNATLTRE/TITLE DATE
. .
SUBVNISION APPLICATTON r~ ~Page 4 of 4
PART III
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED T"HE INFORMATTON
~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND PRELIMINARY PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR
~ r VISTON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY
ON REG TIONS AND WS STATE OF WASHINGTON.
.
I . D DATE: 2- 7'' V2-
44.4
150 D , .,~a DV / PHONE:
7u ` zrn:
tiq•..F~* rs~ER .•~.,J~,
~AfVU
PART IV
(SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION)
I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE -
MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE
PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF N4T TI-E OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS
WRIT'I'EN PERMTSSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HISJHER BEHALF.
SIGNTED: rjheron Hitchcock DATE: Febrvary 10, 1992
ADDRESS: E. 13310 13th. Ave. pHONE; 924-3327
Spokane, WashinRton 99216 ZIp; 99216
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE
STATE OF WASHINGTON }
) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
.
SIGNED AND SWORN TO/AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF
Febrva.ry , 1992, B Y
'I'hecl~
ron Hitchcock NOTARY SEtiL
. Nocary Public in and for the Stat ashi gton
Residing aL Spokane , Washingt n
My appointment expires: June 18, 1992
PART V
(T4 BE COMPLETED BY THE PLAIVNING DEPARTMENT)
DATE SUBMITTED:
DATE ACCEPTED: BY:
TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT
z
e,
~ ~
; THERON W. HITCHCOCK N~ 5475
E. 13310 - 13TH AVENUE 824 3327 ~
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216
► _
19 ~ 18-2/1250 .
Pay to the
Order of 0
. ~
DOlId[S
,
X. gookane''7~~~IBran~r~ .
P.0. Bmc t<48
sporwve, ra eWo ~
~ -
J000 5L+ 7 511' ~ 1: L 2 500'00 241: B 298 7 48811r
r, .N„i.~.~u. i+~ .wr w.r-y.YwV a w r.r fT'M v• r . ~...~.~c.a~~~... .
N U M B E R :
~ oATE RECEIPT 12570&,- ~
~ ~jS~
I,D
~ RECEIVED FROM-1r7L7sl!'Q j C[ f/~
; Addres
o ~~fb J .C~A es~ ~t1 N~G~~ ~ ' ~ ~ _ .
~
~ FOR
Vi
~
~ ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID .
~ s i~~cE G cAsH
' AMOUN7 CHECJ~'
~ PAIO ~ ~r
MADE IN U SA. 13ALAPICE htONEY
e'w5ori0"es.'m DUE I ORDFR I BY
, sp
~
s -
a!~"`
, .......,~r+~"'~'~_' a►
-v ~ ' ■
JO~NS PANE~" 037S .
~r .
1
4'f
~ • p '
. ~
a
cc
V A~E
~
6 i N
X ~
r ~M'70
~2032 , Rt172
030 --~1 ~ ~ zaNE A6 ~
~ 19
ZZ-1
~ Creek
2036----
~'T'",~
~►r ~n
' . .~.4fi
~ j•, y r , ~ ' ~ . ~ - • ' ~ - ~ '
..I~~~
,
.
M,
j .
~1 ' . •
.i;~ R . .
,R
~ '
~rr ~~~►r ~ ~ a~ r7~iC L
l~ . ~".F'a+: +-l•'~G'<i • . •i L. - ~ ' ;.j..~(~,±rK t.vrr' ~ j~ • ~C. ''r~,`' ~ ,~1~ ~ .'.~',~.v_ _ • ~ • • ~ ' S'' ~f tA• 7I~ *~~.~S~itn ' } ~ ~ ~
r S!: .~1~~ 3~. M.~ ~~i,` i~t'i wf~i:~" ` • t e MI ~ 1 ~ ~ Ji ~•77t,' , . ~ • R L
y ~~1►~ . ~ .i=1~~ ~ t{y~✓~ j,• ' \~%••y~; T • ~ S . ~ :i~J`N a•J ij.~• ~ t .~~~2 r V~ ~
.-.v. 1~~ r• ~..i: 't~ " . ~i ~ r
` , ~ , ' ' . , . ~'7y°^' . iY4i`'.~~f• „~l..' i:+~ , ~ :L' , •
'~J.' ,Lr: ~ , , ~ • ~ ~ j ~ ~•Fi<.dy~ `s'~ 1~ 3,)1:~: . 1 t. - j•.
f-~ ~ '~L3' 'S - 4 ~ t• , , 0 2~} ^ af~. ~ e'~ ' .
` J
f ~I
r i' ; . : • ~
G~ aQ.~e,^~ t :,'4..'4 ''r•' Jt ; 7l.~.r,.:~^.~ T%,.~'';~!'~ii~.• . ~ `
a ~ 4,~• r
.'`:o~~a.~~~g,~ .,~t%.~! ~ ~~T ~ ~.~F4,:. r;}.. i ~ •1 7
~ ZL~(~ W~ ; , •~`:j ~T. ~ ~ ~ y:~~ ' ~.t~~ ~
j~ . , ` t] -~Ly :,~,~+'v < , ~y. ' + ~ y • . . , .
~ ' 41;' • 4G ~ p • « ~ . ' r~ , ~-.'T~
• ~ ~ ~,,.1. ~ . , ~ 1 ~ , • . . ~ ' 1 ;1 ~c h MAR',~.' : . . ,
~1f~>~ f. ;6, \V ~ z•'~: , . ..~i,,t: . 4~• ~.;:t:.~.~-.~';..., ,~:y:.::. ~ , , .
4r
f' ~ ~ . . 1t~, . ' • ' ' ..1:..`.~i~{.. ~ •`~I • 1: .j? r t , .
; a ~ . ~ ! . ,~.s...{s . y, ,~+~'7.4 e ~ M ~ n• `i' ~ ,
, z . , ' .i~~ , • a` ~~J b r547 0 ~6
~S PF'-
~t.- - ' f ' ' ` ' '._C-o-.~ :
~'a•.. . ~ r r ' ~ _i. ' ~~/1~~ - • " ~ . ' ~ n
~ ~ _ _,.~j •1.. _ i_ ~.~a ; ` y. . . . ' .
- Ft~ • ~Q;J °j
. ~ ~ ~ • ••r r ~ 5 • l • ~ _ • I
t~~ ' i°.r (r.~~ ~ : ~ ' • • ~`V~ ' E : ; ' v' ' ` - D . ; ,
.t~
~r-~., _ • '2•O- N~..•'. ./C' 4C 3,• •2 . ~g' ~ i . . _
i r r r•~' 7~ . r._
~
i rI ~cg ~ ~ ti ~ • . F ~ , : ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ a• l~ . ~ Z . i~ . ~ • ~ 'n
i- ~ ~ , ~k • ~ P . , ' ~ ' i . . , ' ~ r~': ~ t"• - . `y v i
/ , ! 4 . ' ' ro-..,s ~~M~• f ~ : i ` :'i~'i~ i _ . ~ i;~,;, .r , ~ ~L' 1
~ ~ • • ' ~J' ' ~ ~ 3.,i. '12,: ~ . i..;~ 'S 1 • ' ~
~ ! ,~~f :.a~~+ f,``.3~' , . • ,t .y.~ . ~ "q ;~`;..1 ti 3 ,t;';t •s :4 i', y l~1 ~i .
~ • " ~ ~ y - t I ~'.y~; ~ " . ~s. • : , _ 1 ; ' ' ; : . : f~ . ~ ; 2 ~ ~ ~ ~1 . .
~ ~ . ~ i ~ ' • ' . ; 'i t . .l~r.~ . ~ 1 ,::~`1 ~ ~ , r4. r.~ Y~ ' - i,,yl • •i~t . ~ ~y ~ .v . '
~ . p, ~ • . , ' • . 'P.:~•~"'' ' • ~
2 ~u~•~='~' 'Y~~~•-~''y~; o: , ' I!j
d ~'1 ll't•~ ~'1~
. " ' ` - • ' • ~ ' ,
~ z i , , ►t:'r' : ~ . ' S i, ' , }:ir. ' _ t~ , S S ~ i i _ f . L g ' ~
~t. ~ ; • . , ; .j` : 7 •w . . . . , _ ~ ~
L i' ~:•ti.
~ • ~ • , ~ ~I~.~.r2) SV~ ' ~ , + ' ' 1 y. ~L IVQ ~ R.~ ~ ~ '~1 '
C F{ v ~R. I.1'~ ' • ' , ~ _ _ ~ , t ~ ~ ~ '~~4 . ~ l,
i . 1 ~A~ ~ i • ro'
•~1
r»~ _ t},cl ~ _ - . G~-lrnqg}io' . ~ , • •f ? l i 1 ^ z
~ - _ . •t , Z n tr A V E. ~
i . i _ t~ ~ ~ ~ i; ~ i ZS
.
. ~ ~ ~ ' . • • S .i • ~ 1, ~ . .~~r ~.d F'~
~ 9 .-;r.: n,L
~ • . . r'~' • , ~ 2 .,5 3~.. r~.~ ~
~ . . ~ o . . . . . ' Z . _i, , • y . . . : . GREENACf~ES ~ ELEM. _i ~ . : ~ ~ ,`Q ~
~ Z
1!`Y 13' °,G' ( ~ ~ , ~ . 4 9:' l.,-: - j a~~ h.~: . f 3 j ~ ~ . _4~' ~ ••4 _ •t • •J.
5
- - ' ~ ' . ~ . j' i•~~ ° : . (r. • r" ~ . ~EQ ~ •
. - _ , • • . . ~ i ' S • , . • Co • ` p ~~.Ci_ ' . ~ 1 -u--
to ~ , ~ . • ~ • . : ' : ' . r'~' ~ _ ~ • •
- . ~ . • ~ ' ,
r a 1 1 ~Q~' ' ,o ~ . . • , 10
~ ~ ' ~ . - i. . . . . C~'~ ~ . ~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ Q •ti' ..t • r.i _ . ; I, s ~ ~ , , i f ~ 6~. ~~3 . ~
~ o , ~ C . ' 7 ' : ` ' ~ ' • . • . . . ' . .
} i ...J ' ~ i.... • . 'T . , ~~i n t. t
~ AJ i , ~ , , .F . . ' .FUUf2TH~
~ . . - • • .
,o n ~r .3 ~ . . , _ !V
_ e~ _ ' , - ' ~ ~ . L•---~~ ° 16°+~ - 4 0
3 '
--T-- . , . • ~ ( ' , , , , ; • ; • .
4L/~ ~ !
. j., . ~ - . ~ . ~ • i, ~ . .
4 -3 2 ~ ~1 • _ - e ; ' . ° ' S i
~ 12
I O,~ 13 ; v A' , " : ~ • . 0 ~ ~ ~ ; • . .
~ . • ' ^ ~ • ~ ~ . ' ~ ' ' ( '
~j~; ~ ' = ~,r,y,-= ~ - 'r -~►J~.~- • ~ ~
18
19 E. :.N° 21 I-50'-
20 L~ ~ 30 2 . . . ^ F • ~ ~ , ~
, 1 , ~Y ` ' M'\ ~ ~ ' ~ , • • ~ 0 ' ; ~ I . 4 , ` ~
' • ~ i ~ i' ' 1!~ :~M~~ ' r 'j' 1 ~ ' y• ' ' . i , I • . •
~ ,..~J I . Q.. : ~ ' - ° ' ao 9 . • ',t J • I o ~ ~ . ► 2 i 3
t' • -~,if _ . " r-..._`. i~_ i ~ . ..r • , ~ ~ ~
TM~:ri:^•. . v~ t..: r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • -
.i h r • ' ~ I,,. 1 ~.~'Zg ~ ~ ~ , . ~ . .
s . Q` i . • . : . '7~ '
. ~ •~'f •1~ , ? k4 ~!~2J~'~'~ _~o,
- 5 U,
3 I Q F i~! i • ' ~
E~
aV ~
' ' - - - - ~ ..i _ ~ _ ~ 3 3 ~t. 3cY- - - - - - - - -'r' _ • z c o _ . ~ t'
_ ~
r • _ • .
^ I 1..' ,i { • , ~ . • . ~ . _
• ; : : . y~ ' r4~•~~ ' ~ ,
I . ~ ' r • , ~ . • ~ . ^ ~ ~C7- . . . '
' ' ~ y ~ ' . ' ~ • ' V~Ne ~ ' .
. ! = , , J . ~ . . . , • . t~„_ ; ' , ,
. ~ ~ : • - . ~ ~ . .r,• : , ~ . -r , . ~ , . . -
. ~ . ~ 1 ` • , ; ' I. . . ~ i . . ' . . • • ~ , ' ~ '
. . , . _ . . . _ . . a.~.: . .
• , . ~ ' ~ . • • ' ' 'f , ~.t • t ~ i • ~ ~ • '
. . . _ . ~ . . .r . ~ . . .
. : . , , ` . . H
. . . - ;?yi.; J, • : . . , - • i ~ :a;+`^ • . ' • ' ' • .
• ~ ' _ - . . _ - ; . , • . • ` i ~ .
PKL'I.IAUNAKY 1'LAT OF
HITCHCOCK'S 1ST ADDITION .
.
. . .
ANy04~Vf Ne1i4,sEC.19-2s-45
r~lnier`,••• ` • .
. 20 iiu ru~~r~~cc i~d io4 io4 io4 104
I I~"" ~ I f~55%,pg, :51L'r '&A(.K tj11E ~ Qul (4~l LfOAI 0[IGII/TIDM ,
.4•4 0.6%
~ IdOlfen lo Or~~n.tr~~ t~t. In
~ 1~ 140~7. i•ne Cofeln
-E'}-r• •r e~.t., o.~. 1. ipet...
0 ~ ~ I 2
- ~ -Jso4.6. ccitv'o~
SC~TIG ~.4K~ ~O l.JC
oaAIN v cLo FS~ocK i-,~ ~
Li ~^''r ' reovo~co uu~ nnai. t..uy
~ NUNItA 0r l0Tl7 7f
TI►. LOT Jlllt 10.000 Ia. Il.
,~~'1 r(,q~~\C~ ~ [IIlT. IOM[i UA 1.1
7 conv. rI}Mi u
~LJ''' SSB~ori Se.r 15i,c,c1
~
~ ~ 0 TEMP, Cul-OE•SAC. Tbtver.uE
~ ' S•- A,q E..
I ~ P
0~
M, ` Qx O 55' 8L04 ~i~T l3KK s
~ O I 'L j Srww~Uf f
~ f1 a
0 I3LOGK
J I . , 7, .
(p J --6 4%' AvC L
~jCn1.E I~~SO vi l~o SC Y P7
o q a 7 / ~
0 I I 10 55' 9 Lny. iE7 8~cx
.
• . TEMP• CUL-DE'SXC
Av E. °
~ N
P...a er ,
.L Th~tOn NIICAeeC1
In ItO, 1111
558L 0 4 SCT R%CK
~ ' , ~+c~~+vr~
5
. ~ 8Loc.K
C
20 1to iOh 104 104 i04 (D¢ l'~,,:,~rn~~4'.:•~
. Oo tE : OuLY TNC Nous[ A7 E1e00t To RcMkt u,
Al-L OtNE4 SrQUCYuREt ro BE KEMWIS-o, ' IuCLUpIN4 RESIDEIJSE AT E.1190G . ILIE,jn C'l 8^N • q +_Ne-
s.'7oii saeoNo A%FZC• , •
99212 .
IS09> 92G-5939
.
91