Loading...
Agenda 05/26/2016 ScITYokane Valle y Spokane Valley Planning Commission Regular Meeting Agenda Amended City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. May 26, 2016 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: May 12, 2016 minutes VI. COMMISSION REPORTS VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: a) Planning Commission Findings: CTA-2016-0001, proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.85 Marijuana Uses, 19.120.050 Permitted Use Matrix and Appendix A Definitions b) Study Session: Comprehensive Plan c) Study Session: Comprehensive Plan - Water Districts X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XI. ADJOURNMENT Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall, May 12,2016 Chair Graham called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Administrative Assistant Deanna Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Heather Graham Christina Janssen,Planner James Johnson Chaz Bates,Economic Development Specialist Tim Kelley Mike Phillips Suzanne Stathos Joe Stoy Deanna Horton, Secretary of the Commission Commissioner Stoy moved to accept the May 12, 2016 agenda as presented. The vote was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Stoy moved to approve the April28, 2016 minutes as presented. The vote was seven in favor, zero against and the motion passed. Commissioner Stoy moved to approve the May 3, 2016 minutes as they were presented. Commissioner Graham She wanted to clarify something which was said at the May 3, 2016 joint meeting. She read a prepared statement saying she took exception to statement made by the Community and Economic Development Director John Hohman at the May 3rd Joint Council/Commission meeting. She said during the opening of the meeting Mr. Hohman made a comment that the Planning Commission had somehow diverted its attention away from the Comprehensive Plan to focus on the marijuana issue. She said she would like to remind City staff the Commissioners work at the behest of the staff, as they set the Commission's agenda. Interruption in the Comprehensive Plan was not because the Commission was so focused on the marijuana issues nor was it because they wanted to ignore the Comprehensive Plan, as a matter of fact we spent many meetings addressing several of the items on the Comprehensive Plan,until it fell off the Commission agenda in June (2015). She said there were several meetings cancelled in the summer and the fall. When the Commission resumed in 2016,is when the marijuana issues came forward and the Commission heard nothing more about the Comprehensive Plan until the joint meeting. She stated she cannot speak for all the Commissioners however as the chairman of this Commission,she felt as if the integrity of their work had been questioned. She said she felt it was most important to bring this forward and ask for an apology from City staff. Commissioner Kelley said he did not get that feel from the statement. He said he felt it was more as if Mr. Hohman was simply explaining the Commission has had other work as well, such as this marijuana subject, which has taken considerable time. The other Commissioners said they stood by Commissioner Grahman's statement. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, and the motion passed COMMISSION REPORTS: The Commissioners had no report. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: There was no administrative report. PUBLIC COMMENT: There were no public comments. COMMISSION BUSINESS: A. Public Hearing— CTA-2016-0001 proposed amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)19.85 Marijuana Uses,19.120.050 Permitted Use Matrix and Appendix A Definitions Commissioner Graham opened the public hearing at 6:08 p.m. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb gave an overview of the revised proposed amendments to the SVMC regarding the marijuana regulations. Previously a public hearing had been conducted on April 14, 2016. At that hearing the Commission was contemplating a complete ban on any new retail marijuana stores, any new marijuana producers or processors. After the public hearing the 04-14-16 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 5 Commissioners made an informal decision to modify the proposal for consideration. Staff determined the modifications were substantial enough to warrant another public hearing. The proposed modified amendments are: • A definition for a marijuana club or lounge has been added • A defmition for a marijuana cooperative has been added • The name of the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board has been updated in the defmitions • A defmition for marijuana sales with a medical endorsement has been added • The definition for marijuana sales has been updated to reflect the medical endorsement • Marijuana production has been returned to permitted with supplemental conditions status in the Permitted Use Matrix • Marijuana processing has been returned to permitted with supplemental conditions status in the Permitted Use Matrix • The regulations for 19.85.010, Marijuana production has be added back, with updates to the language regarding City Hall • The regulations for 19.85.020, Marijuana processing has be added back, with updates to the language regarding City Hall • The regulations for 19.85.030 Marijuana retail sales has been modified to state no new marijuana retail sales and allow the current retailers to move within the City as long as they can still conform with the previous standards which were in place • 19.85.040 are the regulations for marijuana uses which are prohibited including clubs, lounges and cooperatives,but does not apply to home grows • 19.85.050 are the regulations for marijuana processing and production in a residential zone, which is home grow for qualified patients. Commissioner Graham asked about the City having a restriction for a marijuana business being near a day care. Mr.Lamb replied the State had its own buffers. City's buffers were in addition to the State's. When an address is identified,the City does a review for not only the City's but also the State's buffers as well. Commissioner Graham closed the public hearing at 6:23 p.m. Commissioner Stoy moved to approve CTA-2016-0001 as presented. Commissioner Johnson said he feels continuing with the moratorium on any new retail business is not going to have the impact the Commission is hoping for. He feels more retail establishments will open immediately outside the City's borders with that revenue going to another jurisdiction. In the end will be just as much cannabis inside the City as if we allowed the market factors to control the business. He did appreciate and support the Commission's evolution on production and process and said he supports Commissioner Phillips amendment from the last meeting to allow the current retail outlets to move should they need to,but he would be voting against the amendment feeling it needed to allow more than the three current retail stores. Commissioner Kelley said he also would be voting against the amendment, saying not enough is known about how this would work. He feels the current amount of producers,processors and retailers are sufficient. He would rather have the City wait five year and see how things have turned out before allowing any more marijuana businesses. He would not be supporting the amendment for this reasons. The other Commissioners had no comments. Chair Graham called for the question. The vote on the motion was five in favor, two against, with Commissioners Johnson and Kelley dissenting. B. Study Session: Comprehensive Plan—Economic Development Retail Improvement Report Economic Development Specialist Chaz Bates gave a presentation on a recently completed economic development study, this one regarding retail improvement, which will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. The information in the study is from 2015. This will be used to track retail growth in the City, this will also provide strategic actions for the City to be able to use in the future. Staff conducted an inventory with the consultants of the current retail in the City and the consultants 04-14-16 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5 were surprised at how many big box stores the City already had. This helped them to identify the key retail anchors, define the retail trade areas, demographics and the retail demand. This report will be used at a tool to assist in attracting businesses and facilitate growth in the City's retail footprint. This report assisted in identifying the primary trade area, which is a five minute drive from a major retail location. This primary trade area is generally the City's boundaries. The secondary trade area is generally a 10 minute drive from a major retail location,which reached out beyond the City's borders. The demographics of the trade area for the City had a wide range of incomes. Mr. Bates stated that relatively speaking the City has a more households earning between$30,000 and$75,000 than the City of Spokane. There were higher pockets of income north and south of the City but these people were driving through the City to shop. The City has almost 36%of our households spending more than 30% of their income on housing costs, which reduces the amount of income for discretionary purchases. Commissioner Johnson asked about the demographics of these statistic. Mr.Bates said he did not have that information with him this evening,however this information was coming from the 2015 American Community Survey data. The greatest number of retail establishments are food services and drinking at 19%, small to mid-size retailers at 13% and motor vehicle/part dealers at 12%. Big box stores only account for 2% of the market,but have a large influence on the retail sales. While the food services account for 19% of the market, they are limited service, not sit down restaurants. The largest spending category was motor vehicle sales and parts,which is followed by general sales which is the big box stores. This is 66% of all the retail sales in the City. The City captures more than 100%of the spending power in most retails categories in the primary trade area. The categories where the City captures less than 100% are accommodations,food and beverage stores,performing arts, and spectator sports. The key themes which came from this study are • Regional draw for shoppers throughout • Spokane Valley Mall is a major retail the region draw • Few neighborhood retailers • Few full-service restaurants • Retail is anchored by big box • Higher incomes outside City to the north and south • Big box stores represent significant • Area of retail are underperforming or portion of sales underutilized Six retail improvement goals came from the report, along with possible supportive actions: • Leverage regional and local assets to drive local commerce o Identify potential projects that could spur tourism and prioritize city investments o Consider implementation of a `night out' program o Consider implementation of a `Taste of Spokane Valley' or `restaurant week' event • Support and expand existing retail centers o Offer financial incentives for voluntary physical improvements o Match businesses to available space o Intensity recruitment efforts o Provide flexibility for allowed uses and development types • Support catalytic,transformative,or innovative retail projects o Encourage high quality retail and supportive uses at Mirabeau Point o Participate in subarea planning process for the City Hall area o Market analysis for a farmer's market • Craft policy to support good retail in the right places o Rezone commercial corridors o Expand and/or create neighborhood commercial overlay zone o Permit `local production' uses • Plan and build infrastructure to support retail development o Identify capital improvements to existing retail centers o Invest in appearance of key gateways in Spokane Valley 04-14-16 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5 o Use Appleway Trail to spur retail development on nearby retail development on nearby parcels • Strengthen Spokane Valley's image as a retail destination o Promote retail segments o Promote Spokane Valley's priorities and marketing in regional marketing efforts o Publicize retailers and events Mr.Bates stated the next steps are to integrate this information into the Comprehensive Plan and amend the development regulations to support these suggestions. Explore retail connections to the Appleway Trail. Develop marketing materials which support our retail trade, coordinate with our regional partners,develop a list of retail vacancies,and coordinate with developers to fulfill economic priorities. Commissioner Anderson asked for clarification on a part of the report which said `critical mass of business verses limited mix,' which is in Exhibit 4. Mr.Bates said there is usually a tipping point when it comes to retail. Commissioner Anderson asked of there was a list of the things the City was missing in its retail, naming specific stores. Mr. Bates stated this was not this consultant's expertise. Information that specific would come from a retail recruiter. Commissioner Anderson said one of the sporting events missing from the list was a volleyball tournament every year,which usually is 12,000 rooms per year. Commissioner Stoy commented on a large soccer tournament which also happens every year at Plante's Ferry Park. Commissioner Johnson wondered how the Planning Commission would be able to impact these goals. Mr. Bates and Ms. Janssen explained the information would assist in creating policy in the Comprehensive Plan which would guide the staff in the work they do. Commissioner Johnson also said he felt there should be more social media interface in order to reach out to the younger people in the community. The subject of a mixed use development in the City of Spokane had been mentioned and Commissioner Anderson has shared he did not feel the City should be `hanging its hat' on this however Commissioner Johnson said he felt a development of this type would be something which should be worked into the plan. Commissioner Stathos said the joint meeting had conflicting points in it. For example there was question of water conservation but in also then beautification of the City with trees and grass which require watering. She said the exercise was eye opening in the fact it seemed to want certain things,in certain areas but not the same in all areas. Mr. Bates stated Mr. Basinger would be returning to the Commission to share the results of the workshop which was held May 3,2016. He said this report did not deal with conservation. She said she would like to see some of these things addressed, hiring a specialist,but she was waiting to find out where the money would come from other than raising taxes. Commissioner Anderson said from a Planning Commission position and the Comprehensive Plan the only thing the Planning Commission could do to assist retail sales tax improvement would be to let zoning restrictions or zoning changes where more businesses could locate. He said a City can't make retail sales happen. He said the City could facilitate it by not restricting business. He said return on investment (ROI) was mentioned in the report several times, but what did we spent to get it,the City did not invest a penny to get it. He did not know what else the City could do other than change the zoning structure,or cut back on our restrictions to allow more businesses. Mr.Bates said the return on investment was referring to hiring a marketing firm to help us develop a marketing program and making sure if we are going to invest in capital improvement it would generate a return on that investment. Commissioner Anderson commented the report discussed investment in infrastructure. Commissioner Johnson asked how much of an impact the Planning Commission would have on the development of infrastructure. Ms. Janssen said the Comprehensive Plan is a road map to staff's work, it guides the programs which are implemented. If implementing infrastructure was a goal & policy in the Comprehensive Plan then staff would work to towards programs or decisions which supported those goals and policies. Commissioner Kelley said he felt it was more like a big picture, broad brush so when changes came forward the Commission would know why things would be a certain way. 04-14-16 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5 GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing for the good of the order. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Johnson moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:05 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimous in favor,motion passed. Chair Heather Graham Date signed Secretary Deanna Horton CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2016 Item: Check all that apply: n consent n old business ® new business n public hearing n information n admin.report n pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA-2016-0001 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Findings and Recommendation—Comprehensive Marijuana Regulations— CTA-2016-0001 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: City initiated a code text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)chapter 19.85,SVMC 19.120.050, and Appendix A to add definitions regarding marijuana uses,prohibit all new marijuana retail uses, cooperatives, and clubs from any zones within the City,to allow existing retail uses to locate within existing zones and subject to existing buffering requirements, and to provide additional regulations for production and processing of home-grown marijuana by qualified patients and designated providers for personal use in residential zones. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; RCW 69.50 (codifying Initiative 502); RCW 69.51A; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040; SVMC 19.85; SVMC 19.120.050 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: City Council has adopted regulations as set forth in SVMC 19.120.050 and SVMC 19.85 for the zoning and buffering of recreational marijuana. On December 9, 2014, City Council adopted a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses (primarily medical marijuana). On October 6, 2015, City Council adopted a moratorium on marijuana uses licensed by the Washington Liquor and Cannabis Board("WSLCB"). On May 12,2016 Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved a modified proposal for recommendation to City Council. BACKGROUND: CTA-2016-0001 is a City-initiated code text amendment proposal as required pursuant to two moratoriums the City has enacted with regard to marijuana uses. The Planning Commission has spent several meetings developing the proposed amendments in response to State Legislative amendments that occurred in 2015. On May 12, 2016, the Planning Commission voted 5-2 to approve proposed amendments and to recommend those proposed amendments to City Council. The draft amendments approved by Planning Commission will amend chapter 19.85 SVMC, SVMC 19.120.050, and Appendix A by (1) adding definitions for medical marijuana endorsed retail stores, marijuana cooperatives,and marijuana clubs,(2)prohibiting any new licensed marijuana retail stores from all zones, (3) allowing existing licensed marijuana retail stores to locate within the existing designated zones in compliance with existing buffering requirements, (4)prohibiting marijuana cooperatives from all zones, (5) prohibiting marijuana clubs or lounges from all zones, (6) requiring any home-growing by qualified patients as allowed by state law to be conducted only in single family residential zones in permanent structures that are opaque and not visible by neighbors or from the public rights-of-way, and to clarify that renters may be required,as may be authorized by federal,state,and local laws,to give notice to landlords of their intention to grow marijuana plants in a rental dwelling. APPROVAL CRITERIA: SVMC Section 17.80.150(F)provides approval criteria for text amendments to the SVMC. The criterion stipulates that the proposed amendment(s) must be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and bear a substantial relation to the public health,safety, welfare,and protection of the environment. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations for CTA-2016-0001 to City Council. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen—Planner Jenny Nickerson—Senior Plans Examiner Erik Lamb—Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Findings and Recommendations for CTA-2016-0001 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CTA-2016-0001 May 26,2016 The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval. Background: 1. Spokane Valley development regulations were adopted in September 2007 and became effective on October 28,2007. 2. CTA-2016-0001 is a city initiated text amendment proposing the amend chapter 19.85 Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC), 19.120.050,and Appendix A by(1)adding definitions for medical marijuana endorsed retail stores, marijuana cooperatives, and marijuana clubs, (2) prohibiting any new licensed marijuana retail stores from all zones, (3) allowing existing licensed marijuana retail stores to locate within the existing designated zones in compliance with existing buffering requirements,(4)prohibiting marijuana cooperatives from all zones, (5)prohibiting marijuana clubs or lounges from all zones, (6) requiring any home-growing by qualified patients as allowed by state law to be conducted only in single family residential zones in permanent structures that are opaque and not visible by neighbors or from the public rights-of-way, and to clarify that renters may be required, as may be authorized by federal, state, and local laws,to give notice to landlords of their intention to grow marijuana plants in a rental dwelling. 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and conducted deliberations on May 12, 2016. The Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend approval to City Council. Planning Commission Findings: 1. Compliance with SVMC 17.80.150F Approval Criteria a. The proposed city initiated code text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. Finding(s): LUP-1.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP-1.2: Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. Land Use Goal LUP-10.2: Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley. Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,consistency, predictability and clear direction. Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate,monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective, and expeditious. Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity, consistency and predictability. Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations CTA-2016-0001 Page 1 of 2 Neighborhood Policy NP-2.1: Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. b. The proposed City-initiated amendment bears a substantial relation to public health,safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. Finding(s): The proposed amendment will allow compliance with state law and allow existing state- licensed recreational and medical marijuana businesses to continue to operate within the Spokane Valley while separating such uses from identified sensitive uses and the City's existing and future residential uses. Further the amendment will limit additional adverse impacts from new marijuana uses on other existing commercial uses. Finally, the proposed amendment will protect the residential character of residential neighborhoods. 2. Conclusion(s): a. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria contained in SVMC 17.80.150(F). b. The Growth Management Act stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. Recommendations: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends City Council adopt the proposed city- initiated code text amendments to chapter 19.85 SVMC, SVMC 19.120.050,and Appendix A. Approved this 26th day of May, 2016 Heather Graham, Chairman ATTEST Deanna Horton,Planning Commission Secretary Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations CTA-2016-0001 Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2016 File Number: Item: Check all that apply: Study Session ❑old business ❑ new business ❑ Public Hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Summary DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:A presentation on the City's process to review and update the adopted Comprehensive Plan. GOVERNING LEGISLATION:None BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Growth Management Act,the City is required to review and update if necessary its comprehensive plan.The City initiated this review in the fall of 2014.After a robust public process, a community vision report was issued in the spring of 2015. Following the vision report, the City conducted an audit of its comprehensive plan identifying missing requirements created from changes in state law since the plan's adoption in 2006. The City then analyzed present land use and available capacity, recent trends, which included housing, office development, demographics, and transportation,culminating in the development of existing conditions reports. Running parallel to the comprehensive plan update process are a number of economic development initiatives, including a retail improvement strategy and a tourism improvement strategy. The goals, policies, and strategies of these studies fit nicely within the context of the comprehensive plan update, especially regarding community priorities and the existing conditions reports. The comprehensive plan update includes substantial revisions to create a user friendly,easy to read,action oriented plan. The goals,policies, and actions are driven by the data from existing conditions reports and economic development studies. Over the coming months, refined goals, policies, and strategies will be presented and reviewed by City Council, Planning Commission, and staff,which will ultimately result in an updated comprehensive plan that reflects community priorities and meets state requirements. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger,Economic Development Coordinator Attachments: None CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: May 26, 2016 File Number: Item: Check all that apply: ❑X Study Session ❑old business ❑ new business ❑ Public Hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Update specific to water rights and water districts. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70.A(Growth Management) BACKGROUND: As part of the City's Comprehensive Plan Update, staff reviewed the City's inventory of water supply services. This presentation reviews pertinent water district data and includes district size (population and acreage),water consumption,water rights and land capacity. Staff has prepared a power point presentation which covers all the water districts and how they relate to each other. Also provided is a supplemental informational packet that has a one-page breakdown for each water district. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion STAFF CONTACT: Henry Allen,Development Engineer Adam Jackson,Assistant Engineer Attachments: PowerPoint Presentation Supplemental Packet: 1-page district breakdown sheets for each district. Spokane Informational Review : Water Purveyors of Spokane Valley May 26, 2016 COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Sitiokane The Water Districts ( 16 Total ) • Carnhope Irrigation District #7 • Model Irrigation District #18 • City of Spokane Water Service • Modern Electric Water Company • Consolidated Irrigation District #19 • Orchard Avenue Irrigation District #6 • East Spokane Water District #1 • Pinecroft Mobile Home Park • Holiday Trailer Court • Spokane Business & Industrial Park • Hutchinson Irrigation District #16 • Spokane County Water District #3 (WSA 1 & 2) • Irvin Water District #6 • Trentwood Irrigation District #3 • Kaiser Aluminum - Trentwood • Vera Water & Power u Spokane Valley - P' Trentwood i_rir - Water Districts Map I.D. #3 ...... City of Millwood Spokane Kaiser Business & Orchard Alum. Industrial Holiday Trailer Court I.D. #6 Irvin W.D.#6 Park la-Ne Pinecrofti 7....c "--.1111111111 ,SCW D M.H. Park Consolidated ity of Spokane #3 11111 I.D. #19 Water Service Modern Electric Water Co WSA 1 Carnhope I.D. #7 Hutchinson TT I.D. #16 1 Vera Water& Power mi Model P I.D. #18 City of Spokane Water Service 1 WD# _ WSA 2 1 Note: East Spokane 8 of the 16 districts that serve W.D. #1 SCWD Spokane Valley are fully #3 WSA 2 contained within the city limits. SCWD #3 Spokane Valley City Limits WSA 2 iltr‘t_i J , ......---"N„.._ Sp"'Okane Residential Service Population .0000Valley City of Spokane Water Service 227,505 Orchard Avenue I.D. #6 2,983 Vera Water & Power 24,962 Hutchinson I.D #16 2,180 Consolidated I.D. #19 22,315 Carnhope I.D. #7 1,750 Modern Electric Water Company 18,560 Pinecroft Mobile Home Park 248 Spokane County W.D. #3 17,095 Holiday Trailer Court 12 (WSA #1 & #2) Model I.D. #18 6,067 Kaiser Aluminum - Trentwood 0 Trentwood I.D. #3 4,188 Spokane Business & Ind. Park 0 Irvin W.D. #6 4,084 TOTALS (Incl. City of Spokane) 335,999 East Spokane W.D. #1 4,050 TOTALS (Excl. City of Spokane) 108,494 2015 OFM COSV Population Est.: 93,340 CITY'one Area Within City ( By LimitsAcres ) Area In Total % In City Acres In Total % In City Water District Name Service Water District Name City Limits Area Limits City Limits Acres Limits Consolidated I.D. #19 4,132 12,433 33% East Spokane W.D. #1 602 1,443 42% Vera W & P 3,949 10,586 37% Orchard Ave. I.D. #6 555 563 99% SCWD #3 (WSA 1 & 2) 3,641 6,056 60% Kaiser Aluminum 491 491 100% Modern EWCo. 3,309 3,309 100% Hutchinson I.D. #16 371 371 100% Trentwood I.D. #3 1,263 1,978 64% Carnhope I.D. #7 277 277 100% Model I.D. #18 1,011 1,050 96% Pinecroft MH Park 15 15 100% City of Spokane 960 48,220 2% Holiday Trailer Ct. 5 5 100% Irvin W.D. #6 949 949 100% Totals (Incl. Spokane) 22,154 88,370 25% Spokane B & I Park 625 625 100% Totals (Excl. Spokane) 21,194 40,150 53% Zoning Designations Map -14 _/— e 4—I by Water District Trentwood I.D. #3 IP City of Millwood .--' - Spokane 'Pr �— Kaiser Business & "' Orchard Alum. Industrial Irvin W.D.#6 40 ' Park * .„..ay . City of Spokane Pinecroft Consolidated SCWD M.H. Park Water Service A I.D. #1 #3 Modern Electric Water Co WSA 1 Carnhope I.D. #7— Hutchinson h1i6son __1— 1 I.0 Vera Water:Power Model I.D. #18 City of Spokane Water Service 1— S�WD# WSA2 rj Legend City of Spokane Valley Note: East Spokane n water Districts 8 of the 16 districts that serve W.D. #1 Industrial SD Spokane Valley are fully Residential WSA 2 I contained within the city limits. mil Commercial Parklopenspace SCWD 7 waterbody #3 WSA 2 A Water District Zoning Designations Within City Limits (By Acres) Residential Industrial Commercial Parks/Open Space Carnhope Irrigation District#7 184 58 53 City of Spokane 621 39 Consolidated Irrigation District#19 1942 East Spokane Water District#1 351 89 6 Holiday Trailer Court 9 i7 Hutchinson Irrigation District#16 264 37 I Irvin Water District#6 323 22 1.7 90 31 Kaiser Trentwood 40 Model Irrigation District#18 1018 3 Modern Electric Water Company 1773 34 35 Orchard Avenue Irrigation District#6 425 7 24 Spokane County Water District#3 I 12382 1D Spokane Industrial Park 9 Trentwood Irrigation District#3 830 Vera Irrigation District#15 3028 W 520 9 " " I " I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ' I " " " I I I I I I 0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4000 Acres CI I I OF Monthly Residential Water Rate Comparison S.0.0pokane Valley Assumes 1 residence consumes 25,000 gallons per month City of Spokane (Service to COSV) $58.65 Modern Electric Water Company $22.80 East Spokane W.D. #1 $43.75 Vera Water & Power $20.13 Carnhope I.D. #7 $35.33 Irvin W.D. #6 $18.19 Orchard Avenue I.D. #6 $35.29 Median $27.00 Trentwood I.D. #3 $29.28 Average $30.51 Spokane County W.D. #3 (WSA #1 & #2) $27.01 Hutchinson I.D #16 $27.00 Holiday Trailer Court No Charge Model I.D. #18 $25.68 Kaiser Aluminum - Trentwood No Charge Consolidated I.D. #19 $23.00 Spokane BIP and Pinecroft MH Park are not available. CITY'one Annual Water Right Capacity 2014 Water Water % Water 2014 Water Water % Water Water District Name Pumped Right Right Water District Name Pumped Right Right (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) Used (Ac-Ft) (Ac-Ft) Used Vera W & P 10,466 10,446 100% City of Spokane 65,077 147,570 44% SCWD #3 (WSA 1 & 2) 5,469 6,456 85% Trentwood I.D. #3 1,552 5,420 29% Irvin W.D. #6 1,391 1,768 79% Modern EWCo. 6,301 29,061 22% Consolidated I.D. #19 13,892 22,410 62% Totals (Incl. Spokane) 110,302 235,303 47% East Spokane W.D. #1 872 1,536 57% Totals (Excl. Spokane) 45,225 87,733 52% Model I.D. #18 2,202 4,115 54% Hutchinson I.D. #16 1,086 2,210 49% Spokane B & I Park - 7,582 - Orchard Ave. I.D. #6 1,479 3,161 47% Kaiser Aluminum - 22,644 - Carnhope I.D. #7 515 1,150 45% Holiday Trailer Ct. and Pinecroft MH Park are not available. City Land Cvs . Water Right s • SOolia' ne Residential ZoningDesignations Only Valley . LQA Capacity % Land % Water LQA Capacity % Land % Water Water District for New Capacity Right Water District for New Capacity Right Connections Used Used Connections Used Used Vera W & P 1,400 87% 100% Carnhope I.D. #7 45 92% 45% SCWD #3 654 91% 85% City of Spokane 12 N/A 44% Irvin W.D. #6 306 87% 79% Trentwood I.D. #3 466 75% 29% Consolidated I.D. #19 1,650 83% 62% Modern EWCo. 1,073 87% 22% East Spokane W.D. #1 166 91% 57% TOTALS 6,012 88% 52%* Model I.D. #18 112 96% 54% (*Ex. W.R. Capacity % excludes City of Spokane) Hutchinson I.D. #16 88 90% 49% DOH does not allow SBIP, Kaiser, Holiday nor Pinecroft Orchard Ave. I.D. #6 40 97% 47% to add any new connections; they are excluded. Sp' ou QUESTIONS ? Sf pokane rnl�op,� Irri ��i�r�iValle . DOA Water System ID: 11250 Inaugural Year: 1921 DOH Residential Service Population: 1,750 Water System Plan Year: 2008 Service Area Size fin A�cresj DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 277 Single Family: 383 Total Service Area: 277 Multi-Family: 68 Percentage of Area in City limits: 100% Commercial/Industrial: 35 DOH Total Service Connections: 486 'Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft) 515 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 1,150 % of Water Right Consumed by District: 45% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 802 (taken from Water System Plan) 'Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COSV Limits I (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane county(LCIA)) Ex. Number of R-and MF- Connections: 451 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 45 (assume full build-out per ex. zoning) Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 496 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth (ppl): 112 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 91% (based on LCA ratio for DUs to ppl) 'System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Distribution System Leakage (DSL) is high. Ongoing 2 well pump stations, 0 reservoirs,7 miles of replacement/upgrading of all service meters (on 10-yr water lines cycles) and in-need areas of the distribution system. Replace 2-port hydrants with 3-port hydrants. Monthly Cost for 25,0{)0 Gallons of Water 35.33 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 43 6%a Rate Schedule Type: Declining block rate (value is a 3-yr running average) �S:I 1 tid•go°°Nium„. City of Spokane poKane Water Service 40000Valley DOH Water System ID: 83100K Inaugural Year: 1883 DOH Residential Service Population: 227,505 Water System Plan Year. 2013 Service Area Size (in Acres) I DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 960 Single Family (602 within COSV); 70,078 Total Service Area: 4822C Multi-Family: 4,267 Percentage of Area in City limits: 2% Commercial/Industrial: 10,906 DON Total Service Connections: 85,251 frotal Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2013 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 65,077 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 147,570 % of Water Right Consumed by District: 44% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 359 (taken from Water System Plan) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within CO5V Limits (Data per Land nuantiry Anoiysis Methodology for Spokane County (LQ,4,) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 602 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 12 Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 614 Capacity for Addt'i Pup. Growth (put): 31 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 98% (based on LOA ratio for DUs to ppl) ISystem Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Aging infrastructure and demand growth creates the 7 well stations, 14 wells, 27 well pumps, 25 need to rehabilitate/replace wells, pump houses, and booster pump stations, 72 booster pumps, reservoirs. New growth requires new reservoirs and 34 reservoirs, and >1,000 miles of water lines_ pump houses to serve new areas. Also, aging water lines conintually need replaced. Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 58.65 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 18.5% Rate Schedule Type: Inclining block rate (value is a 3-yr running average) p•o°1\%••.4.6 anCs D onsolidated Irrigation District #19 Valley 10220& DOH Water System ID: 10221 Inaugural Year; 1966 DOH Residential Service Population: 22,315 Water System Plan Year: 2009 Service Area Size (in Acres) DOH Service Connections: . Area within City limits: 4,132 Single Family; 7,921 Total Service Area: 12,433 Multi-Family: 1,468 Percentage of Area in City limits; 33% Commercial/Industrial: 220 DOH Total Service Connections: 9,609 (Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 13,892 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 22,410 % of Water Right Consumed by District: 62% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit {gal/day) 1,449 (taken from Water System Plan) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COW Limits (Data per Land Quantity Anoiysis Methodology for Spokane County (LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MI-Connections: 9,389 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 1,650 Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 11,039 Capacity for Addt'I Pop. Growth (ppl): 3,965 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 85% (based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) ISystem Infrastructure Details - System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components — "North"'system is not treated for disinfection.Some 34 wells at 11 well sites, 8 pressure zones, 15 reservoirs may not be able to meet future demand. Ongoing reservoirs, 3 booster stations, and 168 miles upsizing of mainlines req"d. New pressure zones to improve of wa#er mains. system, Rehab wells and provide backup power for emergency/redundancy. Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 23.00 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 15,9% Rate Schedule Type: Deci,, (Summer) & Incl. (Winter) (value is a 3-yr running average) son OF East Spokane po ne Water District #1 DOH Water System ID: 216506 Inaugural Year: 1917 DOH Residential Service Population: 4,050 Water System Plan Year: 2007 Service Area Size (in Acres) I 'DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 602 Single Family: 1,175 Total Service Area: 1,443 Multi-Family: 381 Percentage of Area in City limits: 42% Commercial/Industrial: 102 DOH Total Service Connections: 1,659 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below; 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 872 Notes-Water pumped excludes 42 ac-ft purchased from SCWD#3 via intertie. 1,536 ac-ft includes 500 ac- DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 1:535 ft of water taken from MEWca via ir}tcrtie agreement. % of Water Right Consumed by District: 57% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (galfday} 560 (taken from Water System Plan) Land Capacity Based on Existing K- and NU- Zoning Designations Witi�iin C SV Limits (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(LOA)) Ex. Number of R-and MF- Connections: 1,557 Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 166 (1 dwelling unit (DU) - 1 connection) Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 1,723 Capacity for Addt'I Pop. Growth (ppl}: 340 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 90% (based on LOA ratio for DUs to ppl) System infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Storage capacity isa limiting factor in order to meet growth 7 wells with 9 pumps, 5 pressure zones with 4. demands. Booster pump upgrades, along with a new interne booster stations, 3 reservoirs. Length of with Modern, is proposed to help alleviate pumping demand mainlines not avaiable. on the system and its water rights.Also, ongoing mainline replacement is required, Monthly Cost for 25,000 Galions of Water 43.75 Distribution Systems Leakage-DSL: 24.2% Rate Schedule Type: Flat Overage rate (value is a 3-yr running average) I I'1 t]F o ne Holiday Trailer Court .1000 Valley DOH Water System ID: 33679H Inaugural Year: 1970 DOFI Residential Service Population: 12 Water System Plan Year: IService Area Size (in Acres) I 'DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 5 Single Family: 7 Total Service Area: 5 Multi-Family: - Percentage of Area in City limits: 100 Commercial/Industrial: - DOFI Total Service Connections: 7 'Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: - DDH DOES NOT REQUIRE FILES TO BE Oh!-FILE Total Water Pumped by District {ac-ft): - FOR WATER SYSTEMS THAT DO NOT PLAN ON DOE Annual Water Right Allotment {ac-ft): - GROWING. CONSUMPTION DATA IS NOT % of Water Right Consumed by District' AVAILABLE. 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) - (no Water System Plan, no data on file) and Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COSV Limits. {Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 7 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 7 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth (ppl). 0 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 100% (based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) System infrastructure Details System Notes: Existing System Components This is a residential well from 1960s or 1970s that has been 1 well only (unmetered) split to provide service to 6 mobile homes in addition to the original house.The owner of the welt does not charge the residents any consumption charge. There is no available consumption or allottrnetment data. Monthly Cost for 25,O00 Gallons of Water No Charge Distribution System Leakage-DR: N/A Rate Schedule Type: N/A (value is a 3-yr running average) Hutchinson Irrigation Spokane ( 11 District #16 .0000'Valley DOH Water System ID: 35100) Inaugural Year: 1909 DOH Residential Service Population: 2480 Water System Plan Year: 2009 !Service Area Size (in Acres} ID+OH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 371 Single Family: 763 Total Service Area: 371 Multi-Family: 109 Percentage of Area in City limits: 100% Commercial/Industrial: 17 DOH Total Service Connections: 889 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 1,086 — DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 2,210 %of Water Right Consumed by District: 49% 1 Equivalent Residential lJnit (gal,lday) 754 (taken from Water System Plan) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COSV Limits (Data per Lona' Quon tity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 872 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 88 Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 960 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth (pp!): 219 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 91% (based on WA ratio for Mtn ppl) !System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial improvements Existing System Components Portions of distribution system are old and undersized and 2 wells with 4 well pumps, 1 reservoir, and need replaced. Ongoing service meter replacement(on 10- 12 miles of water mains,. year cycles).These improvements should help with system loss (leakage). Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water S 27.00 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 45.8% Rate Schedule Type: Flat Overage rate (value is a 3-yr running average) sin ii,,,. .000"414%..... pokane Irvin Water District #6 Valley - DOH Water System ID: 3605D Inaugural Year: 1927 DOH Residential Service Population: 4,084 Water System Plan Year: 2015 Service Area Size (in Acres) IDOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 949 Single Family: 824 Total Service Area: 949 Multi-Family: 1,038 Percentage of Area in City limits: 100% Commercial/Industrial: 164 _ DOH Total Service Connections: 2,026 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 1,391 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 1,765 %of Water Right Consumed by District: 79% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 449 (taken from Water System Plan) land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COW Limits I (Data per Land Quantity Analysts Methodology for Spvkone County(LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 1,862 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 306 e Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 2,168 Capacity for Addt`i Pop. Growth (ppl): 515 Ex. Connections as of Maximum Capacity: 86 {based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) ISystem infrastructure Details System Deficiendes/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Ongoing maintenance of system facilities. Long term upgrades 4 well pump stations and 2 reservoirs with and expansion to the distribution system is required for 23 miles of water lines. growth.A new office building and/or storage building is long term goal. Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 18.19 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 9.8% Rate Schedule Type: Flat Overage rate (value is a 3-yr running average) !I � Kaiser Aluminum 0 - ane Tr�er�t�roVa11ey . 0011 Water System ID: 3745013 Inaugural Year: DOH Non-Residential Service Pop.: 804 Water System Plan Year: iservice Area Size (in Acres) I 'DOH Service Connections J Area within City limits: 491 Single Family: Total Service Area: 491 Multi-Family: Percentage of Area in City limits: 100% Commercial/Industrial: 5 DOH Total Service Connections: 5 ITotal Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2015 DOH DOES NOT REQUIRE FILES TO BE ON- Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 6,539 HAND FOR WATER SYSTEMS THAT DO NOT DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 22,644 PLAN ON GROWING. % of Water R6ght Consumed by District: 29% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (galfday) - (no residential uses exist in this district) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within CO�SV Limits (Data per L0 d Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(LOA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: - (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacityfor Additional Dwelling Units: - Max. Number of R-and MF- Connections: - Capacity for Addt'I Pop. Growth (ppl): 0 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: - (based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) IT/stern-Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Ongoing repair and rehabilitation of pumas and water lines. 2 active wells (and 1 inactive well) serving 2,100 LF of water lines. NOTE: Water rights are divided for two uses:324 ac-ft for domestic use and 22,320 ac-ft for industrial use. Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water No Charge Distribution System Leakage-DSL: N/A Rate Schedule Type: N/A (value is e 3-yr running average) Model Irrigation District•���ri anec� #18 Valley DOH Water System ID: 55550D Inaugural Year: 1910 DOH Residential Service Population: 6,067 Water System Plan Year; 2011 IService Area Size (in Acres) J OH Service Connections; Area within City limits: 1,011 Single Family: 2,286 Total Service Area: 1,050 Multi-Family: 240 Percentage of Area in City limits: 96% Commercial/Industrial: 6 DCH Total Service connections: 2,532 Total Water Pumped vs- Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft)! 2,202 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 4,115 % of Water Right Consumed by District: 54'% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 631 (taken from Water System Plan) 'Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MZoning Designations Within COSV Limits 1 (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County (LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 2,526 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 112 Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 2,638 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth {ppl): 251 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 96% (based on LCiA ratio for UIJs to ppl) 'System Infrastructure Details System Defidencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components 8 miles of system piping to be replaced over the next 20 6 wells with 1 booster pump station, 2 years: budgeted 4100,000 on mainline replacement reservoirs and 36 miles of water lines. annually. Reservoir capacity is below DOH standard: automatic emergency intertie is available and additional pump capacity is available to meet high flow demands. Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 25.68 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 4.3%® Rate Schedule Type: Inclining block rate (value is a 3-yr running average) 0E, 40011°.11%Iskiftwiti s ,n Modern Electric Water poicane Company Vai1ey DOH Water System ID: 556008 Inaugural Year: 1905 DOH Residential Service Population: 18,560 Water System Plan Year: 2013 'Service Area Size (in Acres) 1OH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 3,309 Single Family: 4,087 Total Service Area: 3,30 Multi-Family: 3,351 Percentage of Area in City limits: 100% Commercial/Industrial: 824 DOH Total Service Connections: 8,262 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2015 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft) 6,301 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 29,061 of Water Right Consumed by District: 22i% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 531 (taken from Water System Plan) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COW Limits 1 (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 7,438 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 1,073 Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 8,511 Capacity for Addt'I Pop. Growth fppi): 2,324 Ex. Connections as of Maximum Capacity: 87% (based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) ;System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Replace 1 well, rehabilitate 1 well, improve various sections 11 wells at 8 difffierent well sites, 2 pressure of the distribution system to meet fire and peak demand reducing valves for the 2 pressure zones, 3 flows. Ongoing meter and distribution network reservoirs, and 10C miles of water lines_ repair/replacement is also required. Monthly Cost for 25,x00 Gallons of Water $ 22.80 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 8.036 Rate Schedule Type: Flat Overage rate (value is a 3-yr running average) SUN Orchard Avenue pokane Irrigation District #6 Va11ey DOH Water System ID: 64000 F Inaugural Year: 1920s DOH Residential Service Population: 2,983 Water System Plan Year: 2015 `Service Area Size (in Acres) IDOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 555 Single Family: 1,237 Total Service Area: 563 Multi-Family: 18 Percentage of Area in City limits: 99% Commercial/Industrial: 4 DOR Total Service Connections: 1,259 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 1r479 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 3,161 to of Water Right Consumed by District: 47% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 483 {taken from Water System Plan) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within CO5V Limits (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and ME- Connections: 1,255 (1 dwelling unit (IDU) = 1 connection} Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 40 Max. Number of R-and MF- Connections: 1,295 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth (ppl): 100 Ex. Connections as% of Maximum Capacity: 97% (based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components The system operates with little redundancy due to only 2 2 wells with 5 well pumps that serve 1 wells and no storage tanks. 25%of the distribution system pressure zone. There are 0 reservoirs and has leak-issues and consists of cast-iron pipe that needs roughly 21 miles of water lines. replaced.About 200 service meters need removed from basements and replaced at propertly lines. Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 35,29 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 13.4% Rate Schedule Type: Flat Overage rate (value is a 3-yr running average) SIö1 Pinecroft Mobile Park Va11ey DOM Water System ID: 67623 F Inaugural Year: 1970 DOH Residential Service Pop.: 248 Water System Plan Year: N/A h9rvice Area Size (in Acres) 1 !DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 15 Single Family: 139 Total Service Area: 15 Multi-Family: - Percentage of Area in City limits: 100% Commercial/Industrial: - _ DOH Total Service Connections: 139 'Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: - DOH DOES NOT REQUIRE FILES TO BE ON-FILE Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): - FOR WATER SYSTEMS THAT DO NOT PLAN ON DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): GROWING. CONSUMPTION DATA IS NOT % of Water Right Consumed by District: _ AVAILABLE_ 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) - (no Water System Plan, no data on file) 'Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and IVIF- Zoning Designations Within CO5V Limits (Data per Land QrrntFty Analysis Methodology for Spokane County (LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 139 {1 dwelling unit (DUI = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: Max Number of R- and MF- Connections: 139 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth (ppl): 0 Ex. Connections as% of Maximums Capacity: 100% (based on LCA ratio for DLIs to ppl' System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ - Distribution System Leakage-DSL: - Rate Schedule Type: (value is a 3-yr running average} : IIS c* Soo. Spokane Business andKane Industrial Park 400001FValley DOH Water System ID: 83027K Inaugural Year: 1942 DOH Non-Residential Service Pop.: 3,500 Water System Plan Year: 1989 Service Area Size (in Acres) [ OH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 625 Single Family: Total Service Area: 525 Multi-Family: Percentage of Area in City limits: 100% Commercial/industrial: 252 DOH Total Service Connections: 252 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: - DOH DOES NOT REQUIRE FILES TO BE ON- Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): - HAND FOR WATER SYSTEMS THAT DO NOT DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 7,582 PLAN ON GROWING. CONSUMPTION DATA % of Water Right Consumed by District: ISI NOT AVAILABLE. 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) - (no Water System Plan, no data on file) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COSY Limits (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County (LQA)) Ex, Number of R- and MF- Connections: - (1 dwelling unit (DU). = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: - Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: - Capacity forAddt'l Pop. Growth (pp!): 0 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: - {based on LCCA.ratio for DUs to ppl} 'System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Per 1989 WSP on file at DOH:: 4 wells, 2 reservoirs and 1,1, miles of water lines, Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water - Distribution System Leakage-DSL: - Rate Schedule Type: (valuei5 a 3-yr running average) . ( Irt' cit . _ _ __ ---- N Spokane County Water pmane District #3 (WSA 1 + 2) 4,0010Valley . 93350 DOH Water System ID: 93351 Inaugural Year: 1986 DOH Residential Service Population: 17,095 Water System Plan year: 2011 Service Area Size Iin Acres) DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 3,641 Single Family: 4,852 Total Service Area: 6,056 Multi-Family: 1,986 Percentage of Area in City limits: 60% Commercial/industrial: 318 DOH Total Service Connections: 7,156 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 5,469 (Water pumped excludes 42 ac-ft sold to DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 6,456 ESWD #1 via intertie -this is rare,) of Water Right Consumed by District: 85% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 611 (taken as weighted average of WSA 1 +2) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and Mil=- Zoning Designations Within CO5V Limits (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(LQA)) Ex, Number of R- and MF- Connections: 6,838 (1 dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) i Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 664 Max. Number of li- and ME- Connections: 7,492 Capacity for Acidt'l Pop. Growth (ppl): 1,491 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 91% (based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Ongoing transmission line replacement, providing an intertie 8 active wells (4 unactive wells also owned between Water Service Areas 1 and 2, upgrade WSA#1 well by district) with 6 pump stations and 16 pump, replace WSA 142 reservoir and booster pump.Ta pumps, 6 reservoirs and roughly 200 miles of accommodate growth, 2 new reservoirs and 3 new booster water lines system wide. stations are required. Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 27.01 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 9.8% Rate Schedule Type: Inclining block rate W5A#1: 14.4% WSA#2: 73 Trentwood Irrigation ` Okossr-----"N„ F District #3 .00.001F Valley DOH Water System ID: 89250 C Inaugural Year: 1918 DOH Residential Service Population: 4,188 Water System Plan Year: 2009 f Service Area Size (in Acres) 1DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 1,263 Single Family: 1,460 Total Service Area: 1,978 Multi-Family: 267 Percentage of Area in City limits: 64% Commercial/Industrial: 162 DOH Total Service Connections. 118$9 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 1,552 DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 5,420 % of Water Right Consumed by District: 29% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 421 Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COSI! Limits (Data per Land Quantity An&ysrs Methodology for Spokane County(LQA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 1,727 (i dwelling unit (DU) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 466 Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 2,193 Capacity for Addt'l Pop_ Growth (ppl): 1461 Ex. Connections as of Maximum Capacity: 79% (based on LOA ratio for DUs to ppl) 'System Infrastructure Details System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Notreatrnent is provided at the well soures, .and ongoing 4 well pump stations, 3 booster stations, 3 system mainline replacement is required. pressure zones, 4 reservoirs, 2 emergency back up wells, and 35 miles of water lines. Monthly Cost for 25,00U Gallons of Water $ 29.28 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 13.8° Rate Schedule Type: Flat Overage rate (value is approx. & based on 4 year values] -0.1 ., s1is' ns ValleyVera1Va�k+er Power iii000 DOH Water System ID: 914505 Inaugural Year: 1908 DOH Residential Service Population: 24,962 Water System Plan Year: 2015 'Service Area Size (in Acres) DOH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 3,949 Single Family; 7,121 Total Service Area: 10,586 Multi-Family: 2,874 Percentage of Area in City limits: 37% Cornmercialflndustrial: 408 DOH Total Service Connections: 10,403 Total Water Pumped vs. Water Rights Allotment Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: 2014 Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 10,45E DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 10,446 % of Water Right Consumed by District: 100% 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 711 (taken as weighted average of WSA 1 + 2) gland Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COSV Limits (Data per Land Quantity Anofysi5 Methodology for Spokane County (WA)) Ex. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 9,995 (1 dwelling unit (DLJ) = 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 1,400 Max. Number of R- and MF-Connections: 11,395 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth (ppl): 3,328 Ex. Connections as% of Maximum Capacity: 88° (based on LOA ratio for DUs to ppl) System Infrastructure Details I System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Various areas of main line need upsized. An overflow 9 wells with 6 booster stations and 5 collection & piping sytem project for the 4 MG reservoir is reservoirs, along with 145 miles of water proposed. lines. Monthly Cost far 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 20.13 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 12.2% Rate Schedule Type: Declining Block rate (value is a 3-yr running average! sin 401.11.1\seas... All Wier Districts po e Serving pokane Valle Valley . DOH Water System ID: - Inaugural Year: Residential Service Pop, (Excl. Spokane): 108,494 Water System Plan Year: - Service Area Size (Acres, Excl. City of Spokane DDH Service Connections: Area within City limits: 21,194 Single Family (Incl. 602 Spokane): 32,858 Total Service Area: 40,150 Multi-Family: 11,800 Percentage of Area in City limits: 53% Commercial/Industrial: 2,517 DOH Total Service Connections: 47,175 Total WaterPumped vs. Water Rights Allotment 1 Calendar Year for Pumped Volume Below: - Total Water Pumped by District (ac-ft): 45,225 Total Water Pumped vs.Water Rights Allotment- DOE Annual Water Right Allotment (ac-ft): 87,733 Excludes: % of Water Right Consumed by All Districts: 521 COS,S3IP, Kaiser, Pinecroft., & Holiday 1 Equivalent Residential Unit (gal/day) 870 lwe-ighted average of reporting district-excludes COS, Kaiser, S . Pinecroft, HoIiday) Land Capacity Based on Existing R- and MF- Zoning Designations Within COSY Limits (Data per Land Quantity Analysis Methodology for Spokane County(WA)) Ex, Number of R- and MF- Connections: 44,658 (1 dwelling unit (DU) 1 connection) Capacity for Additional Dwelling Units: 6,012 Max. Number of R- and MF- Connections: 50,670 Capacity for Addt'l Pop. Growth (del): 13,937 Ex. Connections as % of Maximum Capacity: 881 (based on LQA ratio for DUs to ppl) System Infrastructure Details - - System Deficiencies/Captial Improvements Existing System Components Monthly Cost for 25,000 Gallons of Water $ 30.51 Distribution System Leakage-DSL: 13.5% (Average Monthly Cost For reporting districts-excludes Kaiser,SKIP, (Weighted Average DSL of reporting districts-excludes Pirweuroft, Holiday( COS, Kaiser,SBIP, Pinecroft, Holiday)