The URL can be used to link to this page

27674 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL DRAINAGE PONDS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MAN UAL Shelley Lake 4th Addition CLC No. S020134 Dated - May 2002 OFACIAL PUBUC DOCU.MENT SPOKANE COUNtY ENGINEER'S OFRCE OR GI L . PROJECT # - SUBMITTAL # ~RETURN TO COUMY.ENGINEER By CLC Associates, Inc. RECEIVED 707 W. 7ih Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 SEP 2 3 1002 r~~ sPOKARE couNmEN f 1 DRAINAGE PONDS & OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL 1 1.00 PURPOSE This plan is intended to provide general operations and maintenance guidelines for the drainage ponds and other drainage facilities located in the Shelley Lake 4t" Addition single family residential neighborhood (Shelley Lake 4t'' Addition, PE-1750-94). All facilities discussed are located outside of the County road rights-of-way. Implementation of these guidelines will insure that the drainage facilities installed will function as designed, and continue to discharge stormwater at the design rates to existing outflow. 2.00 INTRODUCTION Generally, the drainage system is intended to treat and evaporate the increase in water runoff generated on-site, by routing the stormwaterthrough a evaporative pond, and discharging the excess stormwater downstream at specified rates. The drainage facilities in this plat consist primarily of a series of a evaporative pond and a run-off ditch. It is therefore of the utmost importance to provide adequate operations and maintenance activities to insure that the evaporation pond and ditch remain silt or dirt free, as free flowing silt or dirt will affect the pond storage volume as well as the ability of the ditch to discharge stormwater. Should these facilities fill up or become clogged, the only remedy would be to remove the silt and debris. Therefore, periodic maintenance is a must. A full set of engineering drawings will be available for review at Spokane County Public Works. 3.00 GENERAL OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS The drainage facilities for GrangerTerrace are generally very simple, functional, and have low maintenance requirements. A periodic visual inspection of the facilities will usually identify any required maintenance. Most maintenance will consist of keeping the pond and ditch free of deleterious debris and sediment. However, a specific inspection schedule should be followed to insure proper and safe operating conditions. See Section 4.0 for recommended maintenance schedules. 3.10 DrainaQe Ponds . Runoff from the streets and lots will go into the pond via inlets and storm drainage piping. For this plat, there is four ponds for storage and discharge, which require maintenance. A sketch of their locations is provided in Exhibit `A', attached to this document. CLC Associates Page 1 of 4 Shelley Lake r Addition O&M Manual ' DRAINAGE PONDS & OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL 3.20 Convevance Ditches & Storm Svstem Piqes Within this development, the street gutters function as storm pipes, conveyance facilities, directing stormwaterto the pond locations. The concrete inlet captures the gutter flow and transfers this flow to the pond locations via HDPE & PVC pipe. 4.00 MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SCHEDULES Below is a maintenance description for each of the drainage system elements contained within the Shelley Lake 4th Addition development, including the ponds. All drainage facilities located outside of County road rights-of-way and within tracts are expected to be maintained by the homeowners association; any drainage facilities located on individual residential lots via easement are to be maintained by the respective homeowners. Should the homeowners association be terminated for any reason, the maintenance responsibilities will become that of the individual homeowners, located within the Shelley Lake 4th Addition plat. General Proper maintenance procedures are a necessityforthe continued functioning of the drainage facilities. Improper maintenance, or lack of attentive maintenance measures, may result in substantial on-site and downstream impacts. It is strongly recommended that the homeowners association designate an individual who will be responsible for making sure the maintenance measures are implemented. Generally, maintenance personnel are to conduct a visual inspection of the drainage facilities immediately following a substantial rainfall or snowmelt event. This could be that it rained noticeably hard for a short period (30 minutes or more) or that it rained steadily for a long period (6 hours or more) or if a significant rainfall and then snow melt event, associated with a"Chinook" melt were to occur in January, February or March when the ground is frozen. For long duration storms, greater than 24 hours, maintenance personnel are to inspect the drainage facilities during the storm event to identify any developing problems and correct them before they become major problems. 1. Inspect all ponds, gutters and inlet grate appurtenances, making sure that they are clear of debris and obstructions. CLC Associates Page 2 of 4 Shelley Lake 4"' Addifion O&M Manual DRAINAGE PONDS & OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL 2. Inspect the pond berms, making sure there are no breaches or breaks in the berm. Immediately repair any breaches or breaks, with a sandy loess soil, compacted in place. These above noted storm event related visual inspections (no. 1, 2, and 3) are in addition to the maintenance schedules noted for each item. 4.20 Inlet Inspections and maintenance of the inlet should be done during inspections of the ponds, making sure that each ofthese inlets is clearof obstructions and debris, and in good condition. If there is any obstruction present, it should be removed immediately. 5.00 Recommended Set-Aside Funds for Maintenance & Future Replacement Costs There will be annual costs to all homeowners to maintain the drainage facilities. In tracts, however, there will be shared costs for ponds on easements. Similarly, there will be replacement costs and major renovation costs of all drainage facilities, which will occur in the future. These replacement costs are the responsibility of the homeowners association or successors in interest. Future replacement and major renovation costs have been converted to annual costs, in the form of recommended set-aside funds. The estimated annual maintenance costs and recommended annual set-aside costs are listed in Table S.OOA. It is recommended the homeowners association set-aside these amount of funds annually, to ensure that adequate maintenance and replacement measures of the drainage facilities will be implemented. CLC Associates Page 3 of 4 Shelley Lake 4' Addition O&M Manua! DRAINAGE PONDS & OTHER DRAINAGE FACILITIES OPERATION & MAINTENANCE MANUAL Drainage Facility Annual Maintenance Annuai Set-Aside Funds for Costs Future Replacement or Major Renovation Drainage Pond $ 858 - Drainage Ditches & Pipes $ - $ 63 Flow Control Structures & $ - $ 238 Drainage Appurtenances Sub-total Annual Costs = $ 858 $ 301 Note: (1) Any renovation costs for ponds are included in the annual maintenance costs. Table 5.00A Total/year = $1,159 Cost per lot/year = $39 (30 lots) CLC Associates Page 4 of 4 Shelley Lake 4' Addition O&M Manual ^ ~ e 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE D E 5 I G N PA D SUITE 200 SPOKANE DENVER WASHINGTON 99204 P 509 456 6640 S P O KA N E F509 458 6844 CLC A550CIATES sA►LT LAKE ctrr PRDJECT: DATE: SUBJECT: BY: JOB NO: .'....e.. } ; % z ' a ' : ' > ~ : i : ' • ~ i ~ ' • ~ : > : ~ : : I : ' ~ , s f 1 3 ~ : ' ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' .y...q~....; ;.,...y....~ ~ - ~_.....w 3 y ~ l 7 , ~ . ; 3 r.. ~p... . Y"".~" j y.J,....' .s. 'sw '.....a...°... r :"_„,7 3 ~r ° f i ~ t b....~_...-. >,.-~~...T.,,~7 r..,.~..`"~'...~"Y I; e > ; i d ~ F • O l~.l~ ~ 3 a Y ~ ~ , : t, e ~ s~, ~ • ~ ~ „~...y'..- .+s ..w. .A~--A-~Y. 9 jj4 } ba 1.-.t ~ . 7 • ; Mi i ' } } ! f . ~ .i.,..¢. ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ t q..",-p~:_ ...k + ~ "4 s i ~ ~"~"'~i ~ # 3 i ~ s-. ; ~..~...~,~..,~.I~N.I~_ ~ ~~~~!I~U►..S~.~t'. ~~~t~ .,.3 ,..,'+,J•...~...j,.,..~~y''' ....p.,.;~ . f ~.,`t . 3 r ~ F,... } ' ~ p~ ~ . s ~ _ ~ 1 ~ ~ a t~.~ E ~ i..~.~- _ ~ . $ yM~~1 ~ . ~ 3 f _ 25 } X ~ ? # V { z x x ~ ~ ) ~ ~ ,s. 1 ~ ^r,._..i.•~ ~ ..ff... - ; , ' ~ ~ ~r b., `...,..3 ~ ~ / ,•j...+,._L....<'.-l.l✓• ~J~ ~ . 3"" >Y; . • . ^ / l71U V~1~~.-E_ ~~..~M.:,F ; -~-R"`~ ~~i~ t.. ~:.<~-~-7...'....~ ..~..~0 ~r~ -w....~. ~ a ~ •r...s - ` (/y { ~t~~'~ Jx' -3 7 G ~J ~ 31~~`~ 1• Q/ S ~3-,• ~ ~ ( ~5• ...i,,.,,,y,...~L.w .a.. Y ~}...~,.3...~V !!~~,~~!.;~,,.~»,.,~i...~....~ :,~._S - w!,=~i~~• u,..,,,p,,,.4 " ~w,...Y.Ya..i--~r_~.~w,.,7C,~„. ~„i ~ + ) $ a t ? ~ ; ~ S . `f t ; . . • ~ i % ~ . ' 1 ° 3 ~ j ~.Y ~,..3 ~ t •rw ~t- i i 4 y1 • ?w ~'t~V ~M~ ! ~ ~ ? . q~.~V.~Y~. ~..Y...y....s. .O.,Av :~.~y ....a,. ' t.., ' ;~,..'A~,\ 1 .3..o..'r..-,- ? f .,,,.y=- P+.-~~p+...•♦t~,-..~^-r. ..i.....yr_.. } aw- 1 j X s~_..~....~.~.~~~- ~ ~ . . , t ~ ~ .Y-.,~-....- ' ? ~ f~' y ~ 3 S . . ' ~ ~ 1 y! . aW.. ,.~.~y~.~ } ~ .......'.u.3v ,..7~ ,.s.....~.... 3r ~ .»....~-•s~-.y..-~.- f....'.. ~ ..;.-5...~...~ ..~.A,.j.~.... ~ ~_.p....~..._;,...a'....q 3Y,y., ~ ~,«.r ' ~r.~~.- -..r...i }.,,y_...., ~ ~ . ~VL F 'f-.,..? ~ ~ $ f ~~1~..,.~`+~~~}•,~ ~~M~ ~ . • # i , . . .~r~" , _ r°.."•~ x`~~- ; ,.vr. 1,,..i.,...~,.s,~ -.1_ ' ; ~ ' 4,.~j i..~--j ~_L..~.. V' ~ ~.r Y---o- ~ ~ • ~ ' ~~y ' , ; ~ ~ ° j - . f _ ; ~ ,N ~ ~ A ~ -i'~ ~ . . e .~.~.~.,._a...~,~....~._.~.__~..... ~ r ~,~....a, ..~--~3~--~•--~-, " .j...,, ~ s ~ ~.,~y~..4...~,.~.~: ~~~Yry ~ 4 = . w_5....n.- ~ i. V~.~.y 4...s~._.~.~..-~.._' {'M'...~-- {3 # - ~ ~'~6...t.... _ ~....~.~...~.Y ~...5..~._. ~ 's ~ 3„ .,.._.W~.: y~ .w. ~ i ,~.....~....p,...~._ ° .S ,~j*... .w. ~ . [ 7~. ~ 3 ! ! ~x,.-~.. . , ~ ~ ~ ►.....~.g ~ ~ i ~1 3 3 3 i ' ~ ~ ~...A..... ° 3 { . : 3..... ~ ~.Wa.'t~....,y...`~1 ~,1 .,3 + 3w~~J g`~.~~ ~S S i . • . i ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~...,;.-_;f.~ ~ ob.. ~ ~ ' • , : ~ ~ ~ ~ . 7 . . ~ ' . ; } 4 7 . ~ i ~ „ 4 t • ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ .:'~M ~ d f ~ ,.e.. ~ ~ x i ~+r~Y~ _ R ~ ~ ~W • 4-...~ s ~Il;p.~~~y.a,~...V °...,`(„~..~i.~~.~..,~,~~ '~"~e N~ i ' ~ ~ rv~^ ~ `~e~--' ~.~w ~~~~.~~~:I~~' ~.I ~l ~ • ~ i~'W a . 4 i e w. , C4..w~ .j~.~~~~ ~~~^i 7 .3./ ~ Y i }~YV~ 4 i i~ } ~ ~ ±p ~F~n..~....y~.....~~,,,~ # . ~v' ...~~~..+~~y V v..i.q• ~ r 3 ~ ~ F ~ F ~ •..r.,~,~,.yi,.,, f_"' ; F ~4 ; ° ~ ~ y ~i ~'iru.~ .~.v,Y.. } ~ A~.~. i 4 . "'Q' .wv } ~ A ~ .w i w ~ ~ ~ Y~~ _~.4~,~.~ ~ #~._3~~.~r~ 0~.0~.... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `7 ~ `i ~ , , ~,°~"'"'~'w " = ~ O 5 ~ ;~E ~ ►1.~~`i ~ w ' ~ ~ ~ } ~ - ~ ~ • : i ~ ~ ~ ` ~ 3 4 S ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~~ara~,r.,r k .oke.. ~ a.. ' ay l~f.~~ '~~w ~ L 7 ,w.. 2 ~ i ~ ~,3 ~ } ~4 F f ~ ' ~w~ Li > T ~ ~ ~ ~ • w~aw. ? ~ ~ ,_f~__.^^9^^ ~ y.w ~ u.r ~.vw ~ ~ ; ~ S ' 1 s ~ r ~ ~ ~ ; •-G T.....~,....~ .,.~i i r -T-1 IW.T.~; . 1/1 O ~ IPG ~ IOF I ' . 'f. ' • ~ ~ ' . . 'f . • ` • I ' ' • • • , . • ~ •'i' •Y1' ' . . , . ..,g,• ' • • . . , , • - . ~ . . ' . ' . , ' , ' . . ~ • - . c. ~ , a ..J , , ' ~•e, ~ n r , •,r. . , _ ' ' _ • ~ . . . ~ . . ~ ~ _ . ~ ~ , . `f • • - WOT • . ~•l. ! :•i. . ' • . . ~ • ~ r~~ ~ . 7~~y Lr~~=yy~ I~r+, . t~ s~.r j, ' • ~r . . ~ . • „ ~ • ' , '4 j's , • ` • . . .s . . , ~i~~t~~_'`~ ~~~~~~~f ~ . ~ - AA..-~uith. ~ r~~z~a~~l~o . ~ . . . - ` " . . - . : . . : :t. ~ ; _ _ . . _ . : . ~ . . - ~ ~ - . F: ~ . ~ - ~22~1~4~~~E.Riverside• . - • ' . • . • _ , . . ' : • - • , . . - • . ' . - - . . " - : - • • . _ . . - . _ • = ..~ashiri on: 99202 - . . - - . ; , ~ S~ Pokane W . x. . :(509j;539-9711~: - ~ . . . - j ; . • . ~ . . • - . - . _ ' - ~ • _ . r~`,.; - , . . . . . . . . , . . . ' z • . . • - . ; , • . . , f : . . . r . , - - • . . ~ - , _ - . . J Y P Y` . ^ _ ~ •t• ~ ~ ••L•• I A~ t ' ' - , • . Rlease ^-revtew--.this~ info 'Fination ~cae efult ` ,~to: ~veri `#h~e~ rriutua! ~ nderstand~n _ - - ~ Y ~ y "te r-ms '~-of.._t~ii$uilor.k;.~-Ai~#io~iation:~ Attachments appiicable =fo:t#iis ~VVor.~~-Auth'orizat(an';are~checked: -Pcovision't:of ~ licat~e attactime ts; r ~ ~ artbf this..* W'~orK i~ ~ ri : . . PP. _ n ~a e~h~ereby,~~ri~ia~e; ~ ~ . `p. . A tfiQ zation' ~Pleage~: ~etum .-a_sign'ed:;origi~ial-;V1/'orIc~Atl.thorizatjon:~to- , : STI ~P ':NortFiwesf ~.#o. authofaie ,the~aao~k . . , _ . 'c' - . :.r~• • , - • . . . . . . . ' • = : ; , "~'t= - - _ ..r.:~':-~ ` , . . ' • - • . ~ - ' ' ~ " ' t: ' ' ' . ' • . , - • ~ . l ,'f'.a_, - - - . : • _ ~ - _ ~ . . .'V• - . , " • i. - _ • ' ' , - - - ~ ~ _ , - _ _ ~,:~t..,~-' • 1' -ROJECT:INFORMATION ~ . . . . , . . ~ - . >:-~;Y ~ , : . . . _ . , _ ~ . - , . . . . _ . ~ ~ <'<i . . - • . . . ' : - . _ _ • ' . . _ , .~a i' • _ i, • - + .Z; •ti,. , '4 . ;s.- ~'i' .~►.ti~ 1,. , . . . . - ~ - . . . . _ -~Phone~ 509) 1~2~.4fi7=2: ~ ~3=:: : ' ~ ' - ,~i~~[•• i . L+~ i.v ' :J. ~ e _ . ~Billir~ Address: ~822.5~N ; . • ' ` g orfh Divisio~i~~Street::Sqokan . VNask~inqton~:99208 . . . . s . , . -1=~~-~ . , ~lent~ - • ' ^ ' , ~ - - ~ j`-_ - , _ - . ^ f. . - ' . _ ~ _ s Representativ. e:- -Buster~Heitman~,_ . . ' , . . . . :t~ . . • , ~Phone:~ . (509) ~ 67=2~~ '~~.C~23'~~~:,:-.,_~:,' % • . - . - . • ~ . . ' + • ~ ; ' " . • _ ~ ~ _ ,'r . RePi-esentafive.s Address: ~ Same. as abo yNo ve: . . - . ~ ~ _ . - . : . , . . . , . . ~ . ~ - ~ , ~ , • rf. • " - ' . . • + , .s . ~ . 3,'. ^ ' .e • r I , r „ ' ~ ~~k•,' ',-~-t , ' rk-.Desc~iP~ tion: Construction. inspection'~and ~materials'testin . - - ~ ~ ~ _ - - :s. 9° ~ . . - - - - - • . . . . ` ' ` • , • - _ : e` " - ' ' 14~ . - _ . . • _ ~ _ . ' ' - r . . . . . . . • ' . . . . ' . l:• . ~ ' . ' • ~ +t°. .~t. ~ ' • r ' • ' . ` . ~ ' , . • . . t a` ~ , ^ • . • r ' , „ ' ' . . ' . • • s . ' " . . _ j. , . , . . . - . . , . ~ , ar .s: ~ : ~ ~ r-~ ' _ • ' • . - ~ . - ~ , ~ _ • _ • . r ~ . . . . . . _ '.C• ~ ea,-_ n :'._ti. -locatio~n•ofVVork: ~Sfieilev~Lake ~Fourtti.Adcli#ion::-Sookane ~County NVashinq . . _ _ . , . - . . . - . . ton~•~. . - - ~ . , _ . • . - . : . : ~ , ' - : . . - _ . ; - . ~ . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . . . ` . . . ~ . _ - _ ` . . . • , - . . . . • . -T.- . - Elient=iNifl-Provide: - ..AoQ'rovec~~bJans:~ •pErmits. •and~orocessi~~fees. . ~ . ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ : : ~ . . . . . - : _ . ~ . . • • _ • : _ ~ : - - _ _ , . • • . . ~ : ` . . _.r • • ' . • • _ - ~ - . . - . . : ~ _ ~ . . - • . . :r - . - . . . ; . , . ; . . , _ • - _ . AP.PUCABLE ATTACNMENT~ _ = • . . , _ , , ~ _ . : . . ~ . • _ : ~ . - : . . . - . . Attachri~ents which•apply`to, this -Work AuthoFazation;'musf- be~checked. - " _ ~ ~ - , ~ ~ ~ , ~ : _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ : : : i' • : . . . • _ . . . • ' ' _ . . t r'- . . ' . . _ . . • " ' ~ . . ~ ~ - - - ' . , . r:. . : : : f : . _ . , • . ~ -DETAILED DESC;RIPTIQN: OF~.1NORK:'. • - ~ ~,SEE ATTACHMENT "A° ~ i 'See'proposal• le~ter dat ~ 19%02~-:~ . ~ . - . ;NOT(CE-~TO ~OV1lNER:._ - ` . = ~ . . ~ • . SEE~ ATTAPHMEN.T.-°B°r i • . ~ : ' : , ' . . . ' ~ . . ~ ~ ~F~- ~ : . ~ : . . - • . ~ ~ - J - ~ , -~3: PROp,QSED FEE: ~ = . - . ~ , ' • . , • , ~ ~ - - . - ~ . ~ . . . • . ' - . . ~ ~ . ' • , • • _ . - Q . . . ; ' ' : ' : . , • , . . _ ` < ir' y ' :BAS)C SER~/CCES~~FEE:- T 3;000:00~'~. ~ ~ : - - _ . ~ . . . , ~ ~ l , ~ ' ' • ~ ' . . . ~ . . . G. . . - ~ .~~,•"~„'T':'• Cs ~;`r _l EXE~CUTlON.O~ 1NORK AUTi-10RIZAT'10 N:~.. ~~The: CLIENT-,c~n~irms=ttiat~ he has :rec,~ived, copies-'of,all..appticable~atta~hments: as~.indicated'•above. arid a~t.:fnre~~ -~of-this-Work- Author~zation,fo.'r`ri~:-and~ttiat all~,informafion~.included~in~the,~V1/ork~Autiiorizatio t . . . . , . . . . n is frue~~and :correct: : ~ - . -i- , . ~ ~ . . , ~ - • . , . . _ ' ' - , , . ; • .i _ ; . . . f _x: . ' ~ . ~ Y~., . ' ' . . c . . . _ ' " . ' _ ' - . `s•~ ' - . . • JI• ' :/f ^ ` ' ~ • t. .t:, . ' Y'~ Ci:IEHT: = r c- e' ..~o,~ menf' , . . . ~ . . 'I• ~ . ' ~ _ . _ ~ _ , V/. _ ~ ~ . . . _ .1,~ . ' ~ • • ' 4• ~ ' . • • ~ 7 ' . ' . . . . ' ' j t . . . - - ` t . , +i ' ' } , ~ . ~ BY: Date: _ . - - - . - . - _ . , - _ . - • : .~T: _r • `T' 1 - . _ , . . i . - . ~ . ~ r ENGJ ~S ~1~ ~V11EST.~ . . • . . ~ ~ , . ~ - . . . _ - • . ~ . . ~ - . , . . . - , :t`;:,- t - • f ' ^ :a ~a' • ~ - ' . • . ~ . • `a . - hr.+ - • , , ' 1• ~B • ~ . . . ~ _ ' ~:-d~ j=~.:•:.: . - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . - . _ - . ~ - . . . . _ ~-Title:" .'Associate,- Y~~ ~ ~ . Qate:. a . ~ e` ~om~ Ctl~NT:~' . - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ . . . - Date.Vlt~.A:, Pro~ ~'sed:~ ~ Sepf>9,' 2002:,,..,_ ~ ~ ~o~~~►~: c~~ t~~ . ~ ~ - - . . . . . . . ~ . . . t~ . . . - . - ~ . . . ~ . . . . . . ;.S~OKAN F.~/~lF~1~g. _F~ouith.-Addi~ion .~ob -No:~.. ~ : . . ' : ~ ' • , . - , - . - ~ . . . ~ - . . . ~ - - . . . ~ ~ ' • - ~ ' ' . F , '1 '•\^7~: • t - •-r"~ • ' ~ ' • . ~ . • .1•, ~ _ . ~.s_ ' . " ~ . : - ~ ,J.• . . • ~ • " . . . ' • ~ - T• ~t ~Y• `~T..~ . . ••i, _ - : . • i. • ' ' , • • . • ' .i, ,`..t.• t• T ~ • ' " ' • _ ' , ' . J , ,a ~ •S' ' _ ' . • . ~ ~ • ~ . ' . ' • . •ny . ~ ~~--s~~c~r~c:~ ;R~ECE~VED ~ - . . . . . . . . ~ . : . . - . . . . . . . _ _ t ~ =w~ `~~ETURW~~'0 COUI1(lY ENGI~VEER . ~ ~ ~ d : . , . ; : ; . . : . . . . ` . ~ , . . . : . . . . . . :.t. _ . : ~ . . _ . , . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . ~ -:~-~t .1~02 . _ - . . f ; _ ~ , , . . ~ • _ : - , . _ _ ~ • ' . ~ • : . ~ . , •a- - . - . . . , STI"WORK AUTH4R12AT10N •a,;,, ; : : _ , . . . . . _ ' . , , . . P~~~ i-:oF s`. . . _SPOKANE COUAC1~l~~ENGINEER - . . - . : ; ~ . . . . . . • _ - , - - . " - . _ - - =R~V~.OQ/41., ° . . . ' ' . • i'i - . . . . ' • ' . . , ` • , , ' ' 4' , ' . _ ;1• F' ' ' ` ' . . • ~ • • • • ' ~ , ~ • ~ • ~ • • ^ - ' • • ~ _ ' • , • . - • ~ . f ~ • • ~ ~ . . . _ BAStC SERVICES -AND, SPEC►' SERVICES-,~ ~ i- ~ _ - - . . , y- • - . . ~ ~ . . , . : . . . ~ . r. ~ , : ' - . , " , 1 - ' . . ' - . . . . . . : ~ . , , . : , ' ' . . . . . . - _ • V ~+,t• ~ at , r Engineering: BASIC~: SERVICES-.shail. be,those:seivices which arg v~ell"~defned a,t;•the tirne 'of::execufi~in,°of the''~1NORK~~ ~ . , . AUT+iORtZRI'lON .and" for.which- STI~~Northwes ~hereinaffer:='refer~ed #o- as th~e- ENGINEE~R~-~ ean :~stablish.-~a°'fxe~d;`fee . - - t;.~_ . . . . . . . . . - ~ . ~ . . . , R,: , • ~maximum. budger 1o.-perfor,m BASIC.`;SERVICES: ' :ll~nieSs~-otFienivise -:noted;-~•the' BASIC::FEE.-'sfiall..•re re'serit{fuU=~ 'compensa~ion~ for performance of "thSERVtC.ES a° one .timeonl ;T~ie ~ENGINEER 'ma' erfor~ii , . ' , L . " . . - . . . . , _ . Y _ . • • . .f..,YJ . . additional : sLrvice.$:'in =addition ~ to;:thb. Bi~SlG::.S~RVECES hen: ,fhe scope =of. the woflc ~required. exceed ~:=the=,BASiC=~.'~ SE~RVICE~S~ouftined .in -fhis Work'Autho~iz _ A, - - ~ ~ • ~ - - • ~ f•-;-~°`~~: ' ~ . _atidri;~,wherv~applicable,:-.6nd~-Attachment A ;TFiese:additional~servrce's~'stiall~ . . .be~refefred to 4sSPECIAL' SERVICES .and~shalf.:tie ~ erfo~ned ,as rieeded'or: as; r Y. .p e.quested- b 't~he':GLIE1yT-;or,.-,,his;'a . , - - on~~~a~ time:.and-expense basis. , ~SPEGIAL~ SER!/ICFS:-.FEES~.b~,sed -on~tiihe~ and"'ezpense',shall'riie~n,.tt'iat~`:~ii~~.~e~; - , . ~ . charged~-is; romputed~ based -or! the;tofai."numbeFs of;hours. required= bye'ach `~employee'to accomplish~ ttie required. woFk" lu.s::an~~allawar~,ce~~~f-or:ove,rFiead"~and:_' r.ofif~: lus;:ex 'eri'ses~~c~ifectl' -.att~ibbtabl~-=tthe~~~oti a~ou li` ~--~r : P P i. s:~ t nedbel'oii:: .F~ees~ = ~chaf" ed for•SPECIALSERVECES`sFialf~ - ition:io"ttie` 3AS1C fE : . . ~ - : ~ - ~ = - . . • ~ ' •y".y • .t. , ..e~ .c :,i . • . „ i; • ` ' . 0 ' • ' _ ~ . ~ ' • • • t, :i~ - . ,:i~ ' . . . ~ _ • -i~►t, , . r~_ . , ~i• . . . nr_.'t't';1_~f_ ~~t ~ .6: _ EEES=FOR ~BASIC SERVICES - - ' - ~ ~ ; .-.A~. - • . ~ ° ' ~ ~ - ~ - - - ~ - . ~ - _ . . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ - ~ • • - ~e;: . . : . • . ' • ~ " - ' ~ c- • . ~ • . ' , . . • . . . : • - . ' . . . . - . _ . - - . " "r~ • S ~ ji . . .The':ENG.IN~EER :will~,piesent~.the~ CLIENTfh .an~itemized, invoice.~each'-~month ~foF SASIC'~SER: ICE~;`p~.erf~'ri~ied:~tie ~ . .nt of ~he . B~ . ~ ~ _ • • = - _ The :amou : . ~ - , . ~ ~ . ..-.Y... ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ revious~ ontti~~ _ ~ . . V . - = - A.S.-fC:SER 1CE5:'~EE~ eharged:'each;month"sfi211=be.ase,d-o"r~.:amoucjt~:ofitime~r:-;~~ ~ ~ ~and~.e enses:x ~end~~ ea ~'B---- - . . . ; . . . ` . . _ ~ . _ . p_ , p ed , ch -montM~ but'ttie .raggregate of ~afl ASIC SERVICES _ FEES `ctiarg.~d'•~on•~.ii~ionthly~:ir~vo;ces:=:.`.; ~ • ' • • + Y. - _ . ' . . t~ ,1-'` . - sMall-not exCee,drthe~total.'BASIC.SER~ I%ICES-tEE'author.ized, herein. ~ . • / • _ ' , . ' . . . - _ ' ' . ' ' . ' . _ . • , . . • • . . ' _ . i ' - : ' ~ • . ~r ' ~ , • _ _ ~ ' . , ! • • , :.7~ -~~FEES~-FOR'SPECIAL SERVICES'~., , . ~ ' , , . r,~` - , , " , . ~ • . - • _.,i - . ~ `;4,~ . _ . .y ' . ' - ' ' - ~ ~ • ~ • - • - ~r • I ~ r . • ..j ~J n ~ - • 1 ~ • •i 't 4 _ . en'the seririces.p"rovided by~t~ie ENGINEER- are riot-'included- in tfie "BASIC'.SERVICES=descrip~fion~~s~.f~wo[k;-.tlie . work-~will be`billed.:to the. CLIEKT~ as:SPECrAL•SE:RICES based ttie 'amoun#*otime and _ezpenses eX'pended~'-each-,'~.. . • ~ ~ ~ - .~month.to:perfiorrr~.the;SPECIAL~,SERWIC~S: ~ . . ~ - • ~ - , - _ ; . f.- , . ~ ~ ~ : - - ~ i~-~ - ~ • . . .'s ` : • ~ - . . . . • , ~ 'f ~ / • , ~ . . ~ ~ ~ +y • • • , 8. . =COMPUTATiON:OF TIME AND.EXPENSE:-.1 . ~ ~ - . . _ ~ : - - . - . ' . . ~ ~ - . . - . ~ - - • - - . . . . . " To.compc~te-:the'TIMErt'ion of the= fee;:~~thes , total-'nu'mber. of-.fiours :r~quireci=tiy eaich employee- to accoinplish. the; . require4l work-.shall- be:;multiplied b,yeach - erxiployee's: job=clas~ification. hourly-,tiilling :rate.: The h'ourly..biiling^Fate: shall ~•r~~~:. , include. ttie- co'st of wages; :payroll: taxesr -,personal' prQpertji=~taXes; =employee`~benefits; office,,,rent;-.teleph'o~e,:c~ari~es;--~ - = , ro.utine: postage ezpenses,-check prints'~and-.docurrient size:copies used:inte~aily to-produce the.wo-dep~ecSation~of-~ . ~ - . , : , 'eq~lipment,* misceltaneous o~ce-and drafting, supp)ies, ~compVter.s,*~plotterssurvey.-equipmen#; software; -adininistra'tive ; ~ ~ ~ . . . -~overhead, ~an-d ~profit. ~ ~ . • . ~ : . . . , - ' ~ : ~ ~ , . - - :r ~ . ~ , . : . . . . . ' . - : _ : • - ~ . ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' • _ . ~ _ ~ - ~ . ; : _ . . . • - .V. . . - ~ . ~The:mazimum~hourly billing tates.by job'cla.ss+fication,are as.follows: • ~ , ~ ~ ' • , . . • • " y, • ' ~ . . • , " . " _ - ~1: - _ - • ~ ;Job Classifcaition~ _Hourly-Billina Rate:~,=-.~~ Job Class~ifcation~'. . • _ . :Hourlv.Billir~4,Rate>- . . : . . : , , . -t ^ . , . , : • , ' ~ , ` • : ` : - , , . , . . . _ . ._.r ~ a . , - •y . ~ ~Y .c - . . Piincipals•._%~ • ~ , . ~ . . _$1~30:00: - . . 2-11IIan~Survey:Crew~-~. . ~ - ' . $105=00':+~~ . . . . ~ . .ASSOCiate~ Planner . ~ 100 00. ~ ~ ~ • ~ ' - ~ G~PS: l quiprriqnt:Eir~ ~addition ~to.crew 90 0=1 . ' . - • . . ' • O , . . '~•~enior~P~oject'~.Manager Registered; tand:Surveyb~': ` ~ ~ ~.~.85~.00-~~ : • ~ Pr,o}ect Manager~ ~ . - . ~ • . - = ~ .85°00~- : ~ ~ • . ~ ~Tectinician . . - ~ : . ~ . ~ . • 60:=00~: ~ . - :&chitl.E~rig~/.Lpndscap*Archi ~Q0.. ~ . ~ . ~ - . ~ : ~ ~ ~ ' _ • . ~ . : e. t: , 80. .35:.0~0.:.,~ . . • ~ . . . ~ - . . ; ~ . . - . . _ - . . ` • : . ~ . . . : - . ` - . . . _ ~ , ~ , - . ' . . . . ,1 _ , • ~ , • ,S ~ •t , .~Ttie..;EXPENSE-_portion- of-the fee will~b~.~.f.or-~out;. of=pocket EXPENSES d'itect[y:'charge6ble_#o-tfie_pf0jecti-5-.E~x6'rpples :of- .-t. . ;EXP.tNSES,-wfiicti will,be~.charge.d:in ~-addition~~o:char-ges~fot time:aFe.as foflows~~;~~ • . ~ ~ = • ' , . • , - . - ' . - ' • . _ ••r' ~ S ~ ° ' .-j' • ~ ~-t - , . '1 . . ~ . ~ - . • , - , . ~ . • •t , ` t~. , . ' . - • 'l - ' ~ ~ i , , . . : • ~ _ . ~ ' 'F ~ _ ' _ ~rc _ ~ . . A. :'P~in#s- or-'ddcument~:size:copies~ prod: uced~.for':ttie~-use. of,.CLIENT~.or:"tii5 `~agei~ts~~w~11~r~qe~=.charged~:at~the:.followmg: . . , . : _ . , . . . - _ ~ • . _ . ~ P~jnts-(24X3fi)$4:4~0/sheet;~Sepia'~2nd*` Origmals-:- 24X36~t-.- ',-$='l~O,QOlsheet;:-Docc~ment~:$~ze, _copy..:_~ . . - • , . . . ~ _ . ~ _ - . - 8:5X Q ) 1~1`. 8:5X.1* 4 = $0:15lsheet:~ . . . . . ~ ~-6: ~.Travel 'related'to-.theP : ro1'ect wilt-be-,'cha 'ed g ~at~•$0:4Q ~er-~riile:.,~ . . ~7~. - - ~ ~ ~ . f~~-- ~ • ~ ~ . ,P EXPENSES.~for_ travel:; lodging: or.raieals ~ for CL"C Associat~s.,-:lnc:;employees~,- whei~'presence of-emPl'qyee _ . . . , har ed:~at;cost lu5`0%a. ~ : . . ~ is-required outside:ttie:metropotita ri-Sp g .p ~ • okane ~area wiU be~c ~ Ma'te~ials.~pu~cha'sed,~ equipment~renfed-and/o~~fees paid'on*behalf.of'the,;CL1ENT-will be,ctiarged`~at:co`sus-:1~%a_: • ~ _'E. Su~co~ntractorslconsultants paid ~by.~.CLC~~Associates,' IRc..on ,betialf:Qf-the.CLtENi'.will;;be•.char.ged~at~~~~o~t•.;ptus~ r ~ • '-r ~i'. . . 'i • • ~ ' . .~5%: _ . : ~ ~ - - . ' ~ , ~ . . ~ ~ . , - . . ' ' _ " , - : ' • _ . , : . - . • , . . , • ' ~ ~ . Jc .r . ~ , • . - ' , , . - • . . . , , _ ' • • . ' ' • ~ , . ' c°~ . _ . • • ' - ~ , _ , ' it':.~ . - . . . ' ' ' ' ' , ~ . • `I• . . . ' . . - . • ' , . . ' y ^ _ , ~ ` . • . . ~ • : - ~ . ~ . ' I • ' ~ , • ._.1~ ' . ~ , ` - ~ . . ' : ~ . ~ - ' ~ . - : . ~ ~ - , - • . ~ . ~ S~rI 'VItORK ntlTH0.R12ATI0N . ~ ' . _ . ~ , . _ " ~ ~ • - ' ; . ~ ~ - ~ ' - : ~ . . - - - . . . :PAQF, 20F5-.•~:' : ~ , _ : • . , _ , . : ~ . _ . . . . - • _ . - . . - , • . . . . . • . . - . ; ~ ~ . _ . • R8V. 49%01' • • ' • . - , - - • ~ - ~ ~ . , . . ~ . . - _ . . . • . ' - , : - - ~ - - - ' • • . ~ , rs-. ~ - - 4. , : ; - . , , ' " . - . . , • . ~ ' , , - ' _ . ' . • • ' ' • ' , ' : ~ , . . • . . ' . " _ • , • ' . . . • . . . . - . , - , ~ . . . - • ' • ' r ~ ~ . • ' • . , ~ • ` ' • ' . , . ' •_C, ' ~ ' . • • • . .•'i: . . , 9....''MQNTWLY BILL"-ING' PROCEDUP 'ND:FORNtAT . ~ ~ ~ . • ~ - : ~ " ~ . + . ' - ~ ~ . - . - : _ . . : ; , ~ . _ - . . ~ . . " ~ : _ - ~ The ~~NC~lNEER~~vyill:-present the'.CLIENT -witFi• an. -invoice -each- month'with-. BASIC:.FEES= itemized:-sepa'rately:~fr.orii - • _ . . : SPEClAL-_ SERVICES.FEES and - EXPENSES~ . .Cha'rges` will -be :itemiied~~by_ -eategory -of`._work, performed'.~by:.'all".: ~ employees collectively,,~but wi11~ NOT be, itemi~ed'showing*each,employee'S~b~IliPig~~ate~and=riumbeF~of~tioifrs~iruo~k~d:on~: ~ - _ :~the.pr.oJect. ;Info~rnation -detailing -employee: -billing ~ ra~es and .the•:ezact ~nu~riber..:-i~f:fiours~ worked - on .th~e:~CL1ENT'S;~ : . ~ p~oject will=be~-made,availabte~to the.CLIENT~if.'requested. CFiarges,~fo~~EXPENS€S,will.~be_itemize.d;Frionfhly:an~.eac invoice. ~ ~ . - - ' ~ . _ . • : ~ ~ . : ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . r ' ~ - , - : ~ . , . . - . , ' ~ ~ • ? - . ~ ~ . : . . ~ . ~ - - ~ ' . . , • ` • V i ; ' . . - . - .i : ..r ~ - . _ • ~ ; . .~".i : ' . ••F?.•~ ' " . t ,Monttiiy~invo'ices a~e~due'and-payable upon:preservtation-and:are pa.st,-d'u.e:,30;iiaysfo~tlov+iir1g°the--invoicd date-:'-~'.1ntetest::''.~~ ~ . , . . . : -at,the.~:rat*6':of %4%_per. ~moritti wi11 be•charged~,on'~all--Past due: aCcounts~wifh:in#er.'e~t=6eing"calculated~from~~tl~e ~invoice~-; date.:: I'nteFest= .wil1 be CQmpounded 'monthly.:--._ ,TKe.-CUENT agrees tQ,, pay,:all:reasonable 'attorrieys. fees: ~.'i~dloi,r::: ~ `cn: ~osts."ir~~urred to ~collect~ past dwe~amounfs;WORK MAY~'BE` $,USPENDED.=ON'~~A~IY.PRQ:~ECT~ ~HAT~r _ . BfG.OMES ~AYS* PAST*:.DUE: ^ 1NORK:`WILL -NOT- RESUME UNTfL.THE~:ACGOUNT° IS~~~?AID ~TO~:A -C . . . 1 . - . - ~ . _ . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ TATUS:,-•.,~ - . . ~ - • , . ' _ , . , ~ ' . . ~ : . • . . _ - ~r- _ ~ • ~ , , . . . : _ . . - ~ . - . ~ • . - . . . - • • , " . . ~ - ~ ' ~ . - . • , . . . ~ - , . _ 7 , . 1Nithin 30~days:afte~.the ~invoice date af~~any-invoiee:~sent by-.the.ENGlNEER.foe~CLIEt4T-pursuant to;tii'is:~proj4ct;.Itlie;.~;~ _ -.CLIENT,stiaif°give,.written`=notice-#or~a'nytc~airried'deficiencies; defects;~or,:~jack~a~~ erf:or.rrrance.~wi~t~.res*pe~t~to:seiVices*.. . . . ~cover,ed =~y serd ~:irivoice;~~ othervvise,.•saiseri~ices"~shaU= be~ctue=~according,~#o ~its._~te~m's~. as ~an•'account:stated:~•_;:Tti~~'.j.. • . r. pu_rpose`of,•,ttiis-.~ron is to provide'-a `means ~of prompt ~notice. so ~thafi~ttie= ENGINEER will ~'not be;• pre}udi~ed: ariti; can.: ~act`expeditioi~sly. #o:resolve. any claimed'-defec#s;.d'e_fiEiencies,:or 1ack~df+perfo~mance: = ~ . ' . ~ - . ~ ~ ~ ~ - • _ ~ _ . _ : • ~ . . . ' . . • : • ' _ . . ' • . • i ' ~ v`• . : - . - - - . ' ~S • . • , ; ' 'r 10. AUTHORI.TY ~ - , - - , . . • . • , : ' ' ~ ~ - - . • ' : ~ _ ~ti:l . - - • . ~ -In-'the'_casE "of,:;conflicts'*between the-WCQRK~:AUTHORIZATl0~1 form- and•.its, AT'TACHMENTS °o~'AM_ENDlUIENTS,~-the . . _ "~fo1lowing~or.der~shall_p~revail with~the"Fiigher.-document taking.precedence over*a document listed-underri,eath: : : ,s..~- - • ° . ! - . ' - . . _ t• . A. AMENDMENT'to the-WORK--AUTNORIZATION• , ~ . . .-B. ~ SPECIAL•.:PROVISIONS to the VUORK:AUTH(Jf21ZATtON_(Attachment "B")~: ~ - ~ Q. bETAILED DESCRIPTION-OF WORK •(Attachmerit °An) . . . . - _ - • - ~ D. Executed-WORK AUTkiORIZATlON`form ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ . ~ ~ - ~ ' - ~ - ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . , , • , _ . . . . - . . . ~ , . . _ , ~ . , - _ - . . . . ' - . Y ~ . • ♦ ' . • y ~ . ♦ . ' • • . . - ' ~ ' - . . • -11. GENERAL,PERFORMANCE PROVISIONS- . ~ . : . ' - . - , . > _ : , , . , ~ . ~ - ~ . - . - A. STI"NORT"WEST, her.ein referred to as ENGINEER, agrees16:perform professional'services as.•described -in-tfiis WORK:AUTHORIZATION including ~applicable= a#actiments. for tfie:CLIENT;, and.: the.CLIEIVT agreest t6.employ-..;, ~ - . : ai~d~~compensate.the* ENGINEER in~accordance-with the ferms of,the 1IVORK.-AUTHORIZAT(ON..;'. . ` . - • _ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ . . . • . . . . : . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . B.; -~During-~the~,perforrriance.:of: ~servic~s- covered` b.y~ this -V~IORK AUTHORIZATIfJN;_ ,tfie~-scope-'of the• ENGINEER'S • . ..,services and.compensation'the~eon'r"riay~be adjusted by rriutually.agreed*upori 'arnendments:,~ ~ ~ - - : ~ . - - : ~ ~ . . _ . . . . . . - - _ . . C, • . . . . . ~ ; . , - , • ' ' • ' ~ • • • , • S This=WORK•'AkJTHORIZATIOfV•~shalf ~be govetn-,bjr the laws. of theproject for;.wtiich-ttie'w&k is ' ~...being°performed,or vtirhenlhete is".no.pro}ect-siter-then_ the'jurisdic,tion.'where,the'wo(k,'is.perform~ed: . . ; _ - : . ' . . , • • : 'i' ~ : - . . ' . ' ' , -1 ~ ~ _ , ~ ' ' ~ - , tFirougti``no: fault. of•,the. ENGINEE~two~k~ coRtemplated'under '#~ie5WORK~,AUTHORIZATION'_extends~langer . :~thai~~tw~lve..months,-frori~~.the•-.date:-ot:~executiofi of said.'WORK~•AUTHORI~ATION~~ the`tinjbilted BASI~:~FEE . . . ~ ; : ~ • .apPlicable);:__,~PECiAL SERUIC~S`~liilli.ng, Fates; and%or..expense: items, may.~be incr"eased:as ~.rtiutuall~r. agreed :for- - ~ ~ - - ~ eac ~year~ the-WORK AUrHORIZA~TION,remains~ in effect~past-the~ first~ ~y~ar,' to..reflect th~~,incTeased:,cost:-of~d'oing:, in~s han`ged~cond'iti' . . . . . ' . . , . . _ ~ ~ ~ . - - . ~ . • ~ - ' . ' . . - - • ~ . ~bus~4nd/or'c - - ~ - . . . - . ~ - . . . . . _ . ' . ' . . . . . - ' . . ' . ' .~j'~ • . ~ , • ~ - . , - . . . . • - _ . A • _ ~ , . ~ 'E~. ;This.:YVORK~AtJTHbRIZA.T:IONr:~ri~ay ermirtated--bY the, CLFENT'"or'the ENGINEER;-by~giving,`written~;,notice-.". _ 4 - . - _ - _ . ~ . . . . . . - . . . . . , . ° '~~seven'~'d~ays,=in. ''.advan,ce~ of~ ttie=-tetminatidn~-date;- by~ rinitual agreemept; - or-~:as'a ~Fesult of_~substantia~:~f~ilu~e. to ` ~ • ~ - : . : . , _ . ~ . ~ - . perfot~~~ in~ accord~nce.-witti,~the;•tefms of; the V110R.1~ AUTNOR(ZATION by;th-e~other.- party, -through no fauft_.of .thez . - . ' terminating~party~._~=lf,_for ar~yreason~;f#iis.-WORK AUTHORIZATION•issterr~i~ate8; -fKe~.ENGINEEf~ shall-be ~iaid=fior, ~ • : • ti-'~extent ofseniices.perforrried:by-:hirim:~#o the.termination~date includin~~reimbursable~expe~ise~s~~hen:di~e:- " ' / • ' • • . . - ~ I . . . 'j^. _ _ . ` . . • , . . . • ~ _ 1 ' , . ~ ' . . . . • • . ' r "F.- ~•:rThe- drawing originals-,---eleetton'ic -fles;° specifcabons; reports,• and:general.project"~fi1es uced ~inr pursuit~,o~=-ifie== • wo'rk':. contemplated;under,this•~WORK;AUTHORIZATIO.N~shall~~~remain~in~:the'~~property'of ttie .ENGINEER: -:Tiie.. pticab(e fo his . . c- ~ • . ~ ~CLI~NT-stialle.;entitled~=to :orie'.sot .-of --approved 6luelin6 prints; ~specifications;jeports;-.efc:; :ap . . , . , ~ . -pacticula.r.VVORK~-AIiTHORiZATION•;:a.s'paft:of~.f~ie BASIC~'FEE.--The"CLI~NT-sliall~~be.entifled~to~additional-copaes ~ - ~ - . ' _ ~andror-seeond~origi~ials-of.dravwngs;;specificationsreports and.projecCfles, forthe:cosf.of handlinand - ~ ~ ~ : - - ~ • ~ ' ' ' _ . ` " . ' , " 'STf mORK'AiJTNORIZATION` . ~ . ~ . ~ - ~ ~ ~ - • . _ 't~ . • : - . , • , . . -'t' . - . : , , , . ` •wr-- = : , _ RQGE 3'OF-5 ~ ' ' t ' • . • . . . - ~ ; - • • • . J- ~ - _ . . - . . . . • ' . : . ~ , ~ • _ _ . ~ , , . . • • • ' ~ , - , REV. 09f01 , . ' " ' - - ~ ~ ° ' - • ' - ~ - ~ ~ ' ' - • ~ • ~ _.s ; . : ~ ~ - - • - • - . - - . . , - . • . , • . . . . • . - - 1, . • _ : ~ , ~ " . • • . ' - . . - . • . - - . . . . . . ' _ ~ . ~ . - • ' ~ - - ~ ~ ~ reproduction= ~of~.-said:.docur ts; ~provided'~,that~-the 'CLIENT is =in..com~s "-~nce: with~ -other;~terms ~of.'the ~IVORK AUTHOF~IZATION: . The,~ co~,.. ,f reproduction of said additionai .documei~:` X~shall be in~ addition to the BASIC FEE.: .;.Electronic fles created-.by the ENGINEER in the, productior►'of'ttie CLI- NT'S work contains p~oprietary _information . _ ~ . . • .whick~~ is.:the.sole -pr,operty.of,ih0_~ENGI.NEER. • ElectroFlic:files•shall-be ,the. sole. property. of_the:EN~1NEER .and will . ~ • kse_releas,ed`t6the~'CL1ENT:oi1he.GL-IENT'S'agent's.olely at the discretion of'the_.ENGINEER-.-- ' ' ` •`'•'t = - _ • ' _ : , '._~a . n ~ S • • ' _ ' , ' . ` , ' _ , . . ' - , ` . 1 _ ~ . , ' , _.'G:: - In: the':event thaf :tli~ GL,IENT: provides. errorreous- iriforrxmafion to, tfie<ENGINEER, or=re~ises-information.previously; . . . • . ~ : ~ . . provided; crea#in,g - ;a 'situation wFiere-, the - ENGI NE ER. has , perfo.rmect: work : that-'must :~be . corrected~ - by • , ~ ~ . ENGtNEER'then- all;'.such: work -will' be-billed .to the:GLIENT as a; SPECIAL. SERVICE: It 'i"s; ~furttier und'erstood tfi'at' • , the:CL'IE~NT'shall liold~thO'ENGINEER HARML~ESS'fr.om all~liabi)ities,, whicfa. may_.accr.ue,;to the.-EfVGINEER:as: a. . : ~ . ;"result of.said-eROneous~.or~,revised, information~:* . , - . . - . , . . - . . . - . . : , - , - . . . , - ' - ~'r:-_, ~ • . 1` . . . • • - • ~ - • _ ' . . . ~•'f . • . - - 2:;~ ~.ENGINEER:RESPONSIBILITIES. ' • ' : . ` '.~t _ . T:r.. . ` : i _ • . ' • - . . . - ~ - : _ . . ' ' , ' , ' , . . . . . : ~ . ' , - . - ' • . ' . : : - .-A' •The. ENGINEER uvill-act~as.•the CLIENT'S ~agent~with iespect:to~those phases of the`project ~to which -this WOR~K • - - -AU,THORi4ATIQN :applies: • . . . Y . , _ ~ . - _ , - . . . - - - ~ F~- ~ . , • 1' :;'s . ~ - , . . ' . . ~ - . . , ` ' • ' L- _ . - _ ~ ~8:" .fihe:~NGINEER:will perforrri his`work in- a:timely-rpanher;.but it is agreed:uporv.betvire~en tlie:parties'to thi,s WORK' `AUTHORIZATION tliat..the- ENGINEER` is'not. responsible. fo~ delays=caus'ed ~by, factors:beyond-his-control, or by_ ~factoi-s:-wrhich: could~not~ reasonabiy:h~ave .been~ foeeseen~at~the~time this-°WORK,AI~THORIZATION~~was 'executed. ' ~ ` - - , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~.~t is,agreed~that,"firriely~rnannei".shaN-rriean.:a:time~frame roughly~equal:.to.that,taken~ by*other-engineers on ~similar_ ~ . ~ , _ . . . _ , projects:,under.similar•eqnditions; requiring similar, approvals:from similar•agencies: - - . , . , . . .r~.: . . - _ = ~ , r: ~ _ . , ; . - . . '`'C,:- - Jhe~ ~ENGINEER ~will perform ~ his*' work,~. in ;accordance with: generally: - accepted . profession -practices -'and '_in accordance -witki-available~ published,staridards:of. approving agenciesand makes. no:other warranty:--_ ~D: : it is.~understood ttiat the ENGINEER-shall -be-respor~sib~re'~for-services:provided.:by personnel in his direct employ.: . , and;that the.•ENGINEER&es not guarantee-the.performance_of an.y other contraetor_associafed.with this project.. - , , . . . : _ . . . ~ _ . _ - . , . . . . . _ , , . ~ - - . . . - ~ - . : • E. It:-is-.unde'rstood."that.the. ENGINEEk.is not~ responsible: for directing.'the CLfEN,T'S conifactor•or, for sctieduling~,. construction.:activities. :t. ~ ~ : • - ~ ' . • " ' • . - ' . ' . ' • . : ~ . - - _ ~ M1 • . :.-.F: ; tt-is-understood* that the ENGINEER shall riot be.responsible to codrdinate with. utility cczmpanies*for the_" design and- installation'o#; electrical senrice,-telephone service, cable TV service, street.lighting or:'other-utilities which the CLIENT-may :require: . ~ ' - ~ . ~ : , . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ - ~ . . - _ . . ` . . ' . . , _ . , : D . ~f • .r. ~ .r ' . ' ~ . . . - . . . . . ' " ~ , ~ , - ' . . ' . ' ~ ' • ' • , . - -.:13..--CLIENT RESPONSIBI6TIES ~ . . - - . . - . ~ . : . . - . - . : . . - . ~ . _ - . . . ~ : . . . ' ' ' ~ . . • ' • . . _ ' ~ . • , , • . . . " - , ~ ' ~ . . ~ ' . . . The..CLIENT _vxilt.pirovide-:all:criteria and. fulf~ informatioc~_as*.~to his.,Fequi~ements -for.~-the=,project: -Ttie: CLIENT will .`assist'"tiie.. ENG:INEER'=by~;placing ~at~.his~. disposal::all ~available, written.-data: ~pe-rtinent~~o'. the: -site of the;ptoject ~ _ . ~ . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . _ , . - - . . . iriCluding;;previous~feports,-correspondence with._public-or,private agencies- or individuals,_tphiC*maps-of.the' area;,.pertinent,:boundary:surveys-and-rrigtit-of_way;-surveys,.- soils- Feports,;~profectiveco,venants,.-and,.ahy, - ;;~.other`material_of.a1ect~nical nature:pertinenf;tothe.proje;ct ;site~wh~ch rnay:tie~required:'~:,~- • ~ ~ - - . ~ : : - - CLEENT` will<~.examine-..all studies;. reports~,' sketches,` -specifcations,.-drawings,'-.;agreements.':and ~other - ~'~do~.uments:,~pFesented ~~by. ttie 'EN~,IN~ER : to• the~~~~LIENT:~: -~he. CLIENT ~vuill,.-givpromPf-written- not~ce-~to -the NGINEER-virhenever=tie,`obserVes-orothecwiseeG~i.mes: awa.re:of_-defects.pettainingto, the'~ENGINEER'S~work ~qn-e.~project.-. . - ~ ~ " ~ . - ~ ° ~ • ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ : . • . - ~ - - + • . ~ • ~ . ~ _ ' " • ' ' 4 - _ ' _ ' ~ .5 ' . ~ ~ • , ' , 1 _ ' _ ' • • ~•t . • . . , ~ , ~ -Wthi6,:30.,days-after'the' invoice.date'of,any~invoice~'sent by:the:ENGINEER~#o the CLIENT_parsuantAo,.thisf'WORK. -"AUTHORIZATION,.-the=G.L-IENT-shall,give'writfen,tiofice~fo.the-,E~1GINEER:of:any claiti~edvdeficienc'ies;-:defec~ts,_or• ~ - ~ - ~ l~ck~~of per~e-with~~espect to, ser.viee~s•cove~ed-bX`said invoic~;_otherwise; payment for~said'serviees:-shall-be. . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ r _ . .dueAaccor"ding,:to,;the=.terms~of~.ttie~lNORK~AUTHORIZATlO~t..~The:purpqserof=theseprovisionso:pFOVidea~ ~ ~-means ~9.4romPt notice to the,ENGINEER* so•fhat~tie;.~iill:r~ot`tie pr.ejudiced:and-cain~:act~ezpeditiously~ to~~resolve~ . -an~r ctaimed• defects; .deficiericies,.or•-lack of perforrtma~rice. ~ ~ ~ . . • . ~ : . ~ - , . - - - : , ' . . . ~ . . . . - . _ . : . , . . . : C•:.. The :CLfENT wilLAes'rgnate in writing,,-- a ~ perso,n'.to.~act •as his- rep'resentative -with'- respect .to.. the--ENGINEtR.S services'-.to~-be,~.perforrnedI under this::V1/ORK'~AUT,H!ORtZATION. ~''Such~-:person--shall ha'v,e;.,authority_ to.:.transrrait:~, . . io.n*s,;-"receiinformation,foe':the:.CLaENTy.~_r.eceive.~and,review the.:ENGINEE~R'S in~i.oiees,~ and'inferpref.pn.d~- ~ ~defne.~~~fhe ~LIEt~T'-S -policies,.arid. decons~.with-~respect"to '•ttie -ENGINEER'S~•`services--covered~-~by~ tfiis~.WORK:-, ~ . AUTHORIZATION. . ~ , . - . - ~ - , . . ~ . ~ . - ~ - . ~ . ~ - : . . ~ . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . , • . ~ ~ . _ ~ ~ _ . . . . - . . , . • . _ ' . , . : • . . - . . . . ~ . •y STk MOR.K'AUTHORIZATtON ' . _ • _ ~ ' , ' ~ - ~ ' : • . - • ; . _ ~ . , - - • - ~ , . _ ~ . , ' ' ~ • ~ ~ . - . . . ' ~ • "PAGE 4 bF-S . ~ ' : ' - . ' - , • ~ . - . . . - ' - . • - , , . • ~ - , - • - • - • . . ti. • . . . . . . • ~ . - ' • ' , ~ - ' RE~: 09/01 ' . ` - , , vt ' ' - .7 ~ . . . , ' ' ' ~ . ' . . ' - ' ~ y ' : • • _ ~ 1 . . . • + ' ' . . ' • . i . ` . = , , ` . ~ . 1 • ~ • . ' . • '1: ~ • , ' ' • , _ . _ ' ~ • ~ ' • ' ' r . . ' • ~ • • , • . ' • _ , J:_ - . , . , , ~ . , r • . : - . . _ ' _ , - • • ' . . 7 _ . . . . . - ~ ~ `=D;.~~:Tti,e:CLIENT'will,tie'.responsif~:- ,:Q~o;m-ake`provi$ioi~s,for=the E~dGINEER'-S." 1I:acce'ss- to',_p~ivate-~{ands.as`may~be~ • . . ' . = ~~eqiiired; .fo, perf~~m required 5~~.':~ices c~nder this WORK-•AUTHORlZATION. - - . - . , - I . - : * - . r ~ . . . . . . . ; ` •:I I - . - • . _ , , : - . , . . 4 - .ENT w' _ _ . _ . , _ _ . - ,T,. _~RE. Th.e:CLI il,~ 6e: respon~ible~fo - r th~e prep~arati ; o-n:andlor~legal-rev;iew~ of:any co . rltracts;or:other~•legal-docu~ .ents-~" . . . ~ ~ - . - - - 'a~vf~ic~i~=rr.iay-b~~ req~~iired'in•:pi~rs~it°of wofk.contei~iplated:.tiy ttiis: V110RK:QUTf~ORIZATION: : , , _ , . . - ` ' • - - . ' . _ . : j, .s.•• _ ^ - 'I ° . . • . ; - _ ~ , . . . •,^v • _ - _ ~ y,I . ~1- . . ' . ` . • . .S: ~ '.t~r ••r - ` ~t' _ i V Y • . . ~F~: -°-*1ie~ ~LE~ T~==wil~ ~~a ibili .~r ~ '`~-r , ~ N _ dvise- fi-' is-:coritractor: of.=fhe.-cor~~'r.actor.'s ,p„ res bns.ty .to;p.otec~~ s~l -sui~ey'stake.s;: rnQriuments, . . . ' 1' • ~ :riaar~CeF~'~~and~~r~fErence~-~ oinfs: - T~ie:CLI~~N~=ot:his,"confracfor-shallbe`.res-~onsitile_ io~~not'i~ .tFie~ENGlN~EE ~tli~ ~ • P . . _ P , ~ e~e~• ~ - .~'r,:.• -f"- -_.~y ' .,a•. ~ ♦ . y.'.,• • - _ . . s . . • , . - _~r: t.workmg ~ - day~: =in:~advance : :,.of ~ tFie ~r.~' ]~uicement ~for.'~the~ :~pnt o~: :cor~struction~ _stakes~, : as=bi~ilf~'survev~ and~a~-=:. ~ . . . . ' ' ~ . n . ~ . ~ ' . • . ~ . ~ : - i . . . i. • ~ ~ : 4' . < l:~y^ - •iy . r•. - -.'1 : - - ' _ ~J • , - - - ~:inspections:. .~~ll/hile~'it:=is~~und~ersto'od~bY ~the:ENCINE~#2:~aritl:tFie~CLl_' 'ENT~ttia ..t•~~situafions~~ ~.~na`v`''ar~se:~~ie'xhcee:'~ ,,_t. •f - ~ ! 11~,.., _ 11. V. ~ - ~J• - ' . - - ~_kiri -~da "s~-a~dvahce~-rio#ic~~ria ~not~,be' racfical,"~~hetinotice~pro'v.ision is_:establ~she~~ta.aid~in tl~-e,determinati .'on~pf:~ . ;~..:r: - g. Y._Y _ _ y.. P _ ~rstood_ ~that>ii~"the•}~ ,,~~U:Y~~ ~ ~ _ _ ~'-''iie`~NC{N EE R: : : It~is fiiar~Etier unde?case'srwhei-ero[~~er . - ,1~. . C ~ i n ' i ~ . .r ge ar~ ~.:jusiti~ed:-by. . .j - , `i i . 7~ :r r. f: - T~ - ~ ^r~ ~ : , ~ npt~ ':ce=~:rs;. ~ -n ~veYot~tirn~E~c: }+`rachticar~f•` _~t° =';EN6-FNEER- t`,~wi~U;~:.make ~ ~eve .~'r`easonable` 'effo~ includ'i over`=tirfiQ}! ~tioi~~ ;to~:: • r' _ - .c_. - - 4.. ; ~ _•ti - -~Y, - . . . _ ~9.),. - , " ` ~ ~ ! _ . - . "i' • • 1' . . ~moi~afei ~ he~~Cl~I~E - ~ ~ ~ - - . :~t= - 'ascor.~ , t NT•,~:scfiedule~ ; . . ,I• . . . . . t• ~ _ . - - ° - - ' ' ~=s: • . ' - _ - A 1\ . • `f. i: .j~* _ - ' • - , , - • , .t' -l. . ~1- - ♦ i',. • . . . ' - `J • t. . ' _ .i{' . •y !.._i_Y . - •f 'J ' - . :i:~' ~ : ' ~ • iVT ~viN . 'ria ~d o eum - ~n =r ' .~.Z '3 " :The_~C-~1 :execute.~*ori'~-a ,timely~ -.ba' t sis~- _alF~a'R~? 'ro. ~e._ e ts e`4. ui .~ed~.:~p~ iu~s •uanY;to ~fhe :~y~llmerit-:bf-.t - '~e~. : . -t.C jI: - r P r~ - " . . . _ . , . . r,.:: ~ -~NGIN -E~R,-~~~ .~nd~~CU~N 'y ~:T~ ~~es~~y~/~J~ risitiilitiers-uri , d~r.ttiis-ORK:AU~F~QRIZAT{ON. . . • - :~y-=~. i~ h - ' ' ~ 1, ~`T' _ ' ' .W ' , •,%.J." 1 ' ,\t : . , ,•k ~ . + _ ' ` ` a ' ~ . ' , . ` ' '~i . • ti `_=r.r.;~ T` 4 • S ~.,,i. " • i • . • . . 4~ .'r . 'rC ! -,r 1.. ' . } ' • • . ' , . ' ~ ~ 'y' •IA - •.i. . . - _ ' - ~;H: ~ :Yhe :CL-IENT'~vaill. 'rovicte~.:f ' urtfi~r:~info~tion~~ t nc~;fees"-on -a~tiFnel.~Yasis q as~~:.re ~~ir.ed:~~.' ~This :infomiatlon ,=an ~/o~•-fe~ . ' J,,.~ ~ p _ . . .:Y. - . • - ; . 2 _ . , . . . ~ ; . . - , _~rria.~~/.iri~fuc~e~=~-tiuf~:xs;notlimit ed .to'':the'followin . • ~ - - ~ . : . . . ~•r. , . ` - `~.-t:';' _ _ " , + . ' g~~'.'~' : . . • ~a: • . . . . . • • - . - . - ~ - : . . - - " . : . ' t . • ' - . ' , . . 4. . > _ - ~ - ' ~~r„ . , • ' - , _ . . . . . . . • . " ' - ' ' ' • e . . - ~1;:: wer.~T:V:: fe~n's~.' . . : . ~ _ - _ ~ . • . _ . _ _ . . . _ ~ . . . • . _ . . . . ~ 1. . . ~:k . .i: :~~_~e A. : - . , , , _ . - . t- ~ ~ -1.:~ ~ ~ . - - - , . . , - . . - . . . , ~ , . . - - - - - _ : ~r:;~. ~ . . ~.:~~2:';~ A ~ licatioii'at~d. . rocessiri . : fees = . _ ~ , . - • , . _PP., . - .P ~.-_9..' . - - - . . ~ - - . • - I ~ ~ - ~ ~~~•~3:~ 'enc~ ~des'i ~n~review~~fees~: ~ - ~ - ~ ~ - . . . - . - : . , _ . - . : i`, . ' _ - - , - 'ti:_ - °~~9 .Y .J. . . . . . . . . - . - .d . - , . - . . . • . - - - ; a ~ r - ~ ' Cost~~of: 'riritin ~ ci d _ mailir`i ~ient~- and 're orts. . ; ~ - . • - - . . , ~ ~ ~ - - _ ~ ~ . ' ' - ~`4~:_-~ P a . .9 ddcu : . . . . ' ~'4 , • - - =5,: ~ ~ Otkie~ fees _9 :~ioti~s _ ~~'ec~~ <•:calf * 'discuss~d ,else_wher.Pe in this :V1fORKAUT ~ - ~ HORlZA • T10N: ' . . ~-tc`, . - ,r _ , , ~ . - ~ _ . -p.: ~ ~ ~ _ - - - ~ - : - - . . _ . . . , _ . . , . . . - rj~,~ - - " . ~ - ~ ` ' _ , - . r~.'=: . • • ' - . _ . 9' :F„ _ . •i - ' _ • - - - ^ . ,--I-:~ ..It;shalFbe~t~he:CLIENT~S;_ " re~por~sibititjrto:make,arrangerrientwith:a'pp~op`r-iate~utilitycompanies'fo~-=tFie"design:and~'.~-~ ~ _ : 1`,~ . - - -ins#allafion;of~utili~ies.virhich~=ma` _be re -uired- to~be'instafled corrcunent- wittistreet; sto~r:n~~,dcaina~e;-=sewe~;-wat~ro~:° ~`~-=A' ~ . -:otti~er~~facili bein ~:desi ~ neci -andlo.rYin~ ~ 'ted ~b ~~the:~ENGINEER. --~aidYUtilities ~maY~ inClude; -b . 9t.a~e not• -~'limitiedI - tY . . . .9.. _ . . ~ . _ Y . . _ . - . . . . . _ . ~ : , ' . : ' . _ to; .ekectncal~~Rowee .senrice; :.~elep~Fi.ne ~service:.cabte TV seniice; or' street lighting::, ~ ~ : _ . , . - .r- , - - _ . ~ . - . _ . . . . . , . . _ " . - _ . : . - . . - ~ . . . . - ~ . . • ~ , .~J:,', It':'is`.speei,ficaily:~'understood:~-that~~`the'~~CLI~NT~~has...'not-.retair~ed the~~ENGlNEER~ ~as, a ;const~uetion~ manage~.- - . - -~~~~espg ibte.for~.directing.fhe"CU~NT'S_contractor and/or~scheduling-constru~tion activities:'-:The:CLIE~NT~sFiall~ .0be'~, ~ - ~ . . - - . . - . . ^ _ ~ . - _ . . . " - . ~resQibl~ fo, provide~ his~ ~ontractors with~curre~t;apRroved.~plar~s;and specifiications,~., ' . . - . - • . • ~ , . - . . . . , . i . . : , - . - . ..'i- • ' . ' ~ . - t - _ - . _ ~ . - . - I . _ -I€~is~"und~ersto.oci:tiiat:~the~;ENGINE~R'S:~r_egular'work'in ~tiours::for~all~of.his.'employees'is.eighf'.hours;p:er..:day,arid:forty ~ : . . , : . _ . . - ._,9.;• . s . - ' • °,~,.,:_fioiirs:~er,~•week;''less_paid, h'oli~fay_hours;.wt~ich~may ~occur1in a~:particular,week. . Re~ular,-`work.ifays-are-Moln.day._ttirough~;` . . -~ida ~Th~~~NGINEER`S~~'establistied~= `aid' hblicfa~'s~-a~e:as-foUdws:~. ~-New:Year's:b~a Merrional- •Da ;:the Fourth :o~r~' =FY~ ' _ _ , Y . . . s _ . . .Y _ . . . . - - . . . . . ~ ~J uf. L:borrDa ,;'TfiarikS iv ir~ aric~.:Christm~s. ~ . " ' ~4 - . . . ~ ~ . ~ : . = ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ : ' , . : . ~ : ; - . _ -Y . La .Y . ; 9 . 9 . . . F . ~,r . . . - :.r . :s"_ ' _ f • ' , . . : ~ • . . ~ , t , . ' _ . . i- • > . `i Y . _ • . - 1 - . ` r • ~ _ - _ ' ' ` ' 1 - . • ' , . : . ~ e :~.ti vh ~t-~th~ r i" - =vui . ~w`- - - 1, =w ~ ~-rnore t i~ ~n.*;::. E,n,:~a e~disc ~t o' of-~the ENGINEER; ~th e~ ENGINEER-S_ offce,, de ork load;•~each~es _a~~yfeve. ,tie :i :~re ~9:~ ula . r:.wo~kiri-9 -hours: afe _ u~ir . edSto~.accoi~~- listi~ - the~work;.on a::timel 'basis; ahd: . . . wher~~~the . -C . LI ..E. N . -~"::t~as ~,given:. p roper:~- : - . . - . . q, . : - . . : . `notice of::wrork=to~be~,per`fo~rrietl;'.the :EN. . GIN~ER. P. . ma el. e ct~*-to. ,.req.ui..f.y t' h . is', . erriployees~.Co~work~in ez~ess`of~ the- , :regular:,: - . . - _ - .,-z7 _ _ _.Y~'~ f~ _ . . . . . , ' ' , .t-,- , • ~.wor:kiti ~cha e-.Sfor~~all,wQ~k.~at~ther~e ~~rla~=woricin=billin~ ~ate~:. . - - ~ - _ . . - ` ~ i~ r. 9. . kio,.urs~.an. -.d~ .~9. • . ~ . . 9~.. . .g:~.~,ou~. g - 'r~ ^ . .a: "I. - , . " ~ : . . . ' _ ~ _ ~ , • , - _ 't=. ,.r- " - *s'- . , • . . . . . . . _ ~ _ ~y.' ' - - • . :1 'a•' i ''~f . •y - ' . - ~ . • . f , •c• . _ 'r . . - ~ - ~k~, ~ o_be.~ -er~ormed~ or~~he~V.- lume~.of`~ ~ ork~.to~~be~: ~ erfor~ried~is~J:=" . .If;':~i'owever; ~iie~CCIE(~T'faiFs-°-~o`9~ . ~ive``proper~-notice=of~y+rvr t .p . o w _p.,;_ _ Cr : . ' ' ' " ' " 1 - _ '1;.7 .b- .l _ ' .t' 1 ~ ';h - -ohvious ~4~in;:ezeeSs•~o~#~= .wFiat-;cari e, `e~formed;`d'~ ~n ;ttie~=~e~~uI a~- :woKkin .hour•s~~vai1~`ble=,9 iVen:the~:ENC~~1~E(~ , ,S:~ r;~ _ _:~Y:. _ y _:9. .9 9' -3. . , .t- . , , . _ ~ ~t `v' ~ ~'~~:ENP ~R. -~a uirey is;ern~ lo` 6es'to%:w 'rk~:' ~e `cess~of~.the:-re~~uiarv in` :normal, manpowe~ e _ el;;then~:the ~ GI~tE~ :m : Y;.. e~ :h. , P Y. . . Q .x .r .9 9, ~ - - - - -.E~~:a .Fate~o ~f-~1- . I~ r:b711ir~` rafe~. - _ .:tio~i_rs~a ~ . ~NT excess-hou~s;ara.'ove rtime .5~.#ir'ri~~ the~r cgu. _ . Fha~ : _ :4-~ " _ 9'e. -t he"GE ..r 'f or: ~tM e - - " • ~,r . r~.- - ~;~~t~-. i~ 'Under,' tbod~~th~t~.~t.41 e'.EI~GIN~R'S':FEE~~~for'~;SA ~IC ~SERVEC~S~~and, :th~e~:ho~ r4y~rate~'-fo.. -SPE~ , gIAt:S ~RtliCES~s: ' . •.t• . . _ , , 4.•. _ . S~• .,h.~, . ' i. i• ~ " i"'' ' ' a:" k . . ~ased~,o~.-b:ein :a~l~to~~' :erfori»;`nearl"~=aN~work~.pro ~osed.~in-~u11:siftsigtiC-hours.dr.mor,e:--:rf-~for~reans:bey.o ri d, t#~e'~ . ~R~~ ; 9. - - p . - Y. . . . . P . . _ . , . _ : ~.-.a . . . . ' ~~.'.;':~.cQntrol"offhe~~~~NGiN~fR'y~his..employe •es~~caniiot'p~~oGm~;tl~e-~pFO.~a , of esed worj~.suasta~ttial{y:iii~:eight~tiour.1shifts~:~ta -eri~.the°. y • _ ' _ ' _ ' J, : ~ *t i _ 5 _ l s ~ d e- ~ _ ~ = - . . ~ ~EP~?GtNFER,~S'~EEE'riaa =be~fene "p iafed_fo~~yow. , for.~overtirime a'=rat~s: . _ - . . _ , . . ' . . . _ _ . .Y- .9. , . ' ; ~P. Y. : . . . _ _ ~:.t'. ~ . ' _ ` - ._e v'. ' . . _ - _ . 't . •i.' - . %i: c: • . ;>r :s .i . y`r' ' _ - • ' . . . i ' .i • 'ti _ :t` ' . • ' . _ ' ,t' . . t - ;,s I r~ . . t • . i . ' . { r - - _ . - v ' • y ' ' . . ~ . - ' t l .t . _ • ( ' ` - - ' • . _ ` - " ' , . - - . ' . r.c.' ' - . ~ . ~ .°'Y' 'oi:•M~• _ , - t ' ' • _ ~ G _ _ -r.. _ _ • ~l__ _ . •i• - • ~ ~ _s ' ~ " . ' f • ,',y', . . 'J • . .V • '7• • ' • ~ ,i, ' 'S. IY ..'t,, . .c . ' [ . . 'N . ~ . . _ , .Y, '•E~: E • ~ ~ . , . . ' _ - ' • - . • , • ' J . r . . . . . • ' . . • • ' . . - • - ' ` < < :.J. . , _ r• . . . • . . - , ~ . . .z~ , 'r: . . - ' .l- • ..c;•: • :r.;:';`' . .r~. _ • ...~.,w. • ° . '•l . ' " n,• ' ' . ' ' ' . - • . 'i . f' . , 'I'. - _ ~ : ~t. .`.-l . 4 _ . • .i ~ , ~ . " i ' • .:Jr• a . - , . _ L- ♦yC' ~ . . . , : . ~ - _ . ` '',c, ~ ' - a- <STt 'W0RIIr..-AUTHOR.IT t~TION: . . . - - _ . , - - . ' . . _ ~ - c - ~r - . . . . . ~ . . _ 0, : . ~ . :,-RAGE ~~O~S. - ;•r : t . - . = • • , . _ .::-r: . - - • - , - ~a• _ . . ' • ' - ' - ' - ~ RE:V. Q9 i0. 1 • . ' • ~ . . ~f. ~ , , . . . - • , _ : • , - , _ . . I _ . : ~ ~ - ~ . ~ : . . P . : - . . ~ • - - L - . . , . . : , , • c-;~_: - ' . . , . , , • ' . • . - - - ~•s•: - - . • . - - • . . - • _ , . . • ...s. , . ' ' ' - . . , - ' ` . • - - ..t ~ • ' _ . - • . . . . , . •t•. . , • • , ' . . . . . ~ " . . . . . . . - , , . . . . _ . . . . . . - . . • . - . . . - . . _ . . , , . . . - t _ . . ~ ' % ~ , • . , ' . . • " ' ' 1 ' . . ' . ' • , , 1 ' ~ . . . , • ~~C' _ , , ' , . , .t•I I. . , i ,c, : ; 1 . 1, . . . . 1 . . ' ' . , ' , . ' • , • . • ' ' . ` ~ ~t' . ' 1 •'r' , . _ ,j , . ; ` , , ; ' . J . , . ' 'i•1•~. . ~ ~ . ~ ~ I ' , : 1", . • . ' ~ 1 f. ? . ' • • • • ' - - ' .fi r 1 : ~ . ~ . ' ' .'\.Ay, ' • , , ,1 . . .l, - , - . f . • i , ^ ..4'. . ~ . ~ - . - .~1.' • , . ~ : . • ~ ~ , ' , . , . ~ . f . r . ~ ~ ' .r . . ~ , . • 'i- . .C i~~ i ~ ~ i ' • ~ , . . . . . 1, . I• ~ ' . . ~ ' ,1'. , , . „ . • ~ 1. +l. ' i"'fI; ~ t ti• ~ I. ' ~ 'S . ' • ti . ~ • a t . • ~ ~ . . ~~i" , ' , , ' ~ - ` • . . , r . '~L .y ' ; ' . • ~ • . ~ Z • } , • ~ •1 ' . t • l . ' I. ; ~I. . . . , ' , . I: . . ' . ` ~ ~ . , ' . . ' . t , ' .:1 . ~ , . ~ ~ , • , `,1.; ti1~~ 1. . , ~ _ , ' . , . . , , ~A'„ • " . • . . - - . • ; > ` . . , F. ' : ' - . 1 . • . ' ' . , ' ' . . - - - . . . ''I ij . ~ ~ ' . , . . , i. ''i'' ~ ~ . . ~ , " .1 ' e • i ' • j . ' , ' 'r't.. . ~ ',t . : . '.`.,i`:. . • ' ' ' ' . ' ~ ' . ~ . , • , . , . • . , r y: ~ .I~ ' 'I ',~C. . '..n• „ , ' . ' , . . , I • ' ' . . , • • ~ ~ ' , ~ . ~ .f',~ I ~ ~e l* , S„ i , . i . . , , . . , } . , I . . . , • . , r ~ ~ V 4.. . , • . . . , . ~ ~ ~ . ~ : . .'r ' ;q . , , . i , ~'•jhr'.. .f. .'i _ . .t'.~ % 'J' ,r . ' i.~ .r . • ' , ' . ~ ',i, . i~.. 'i , _ _ • • . , . ' ' . , ' .r ' • , ~ , " , • • •r ^ .`ii' : • • ' " ' ` . . ~ 7'~ :i'. • . , ' ' ' r ' „ ~t~, . , , . ' I. ~r~~ ' ' r• ~ . . • , i' , , . . , . ~ . . ~ ~ ~`ti+•,r ",r - . , . ' fi~~: , , 'i ~ . , • . 1 , • . r . 7. • . ' , , , 'r:,• . . . ~ ' ~ I - ' ' r . ~ ~ . ~ ' ' ' , . . . ' . ' ' .~1~ 'r ,'',:r' ~I ; . R. , t~, . j.1 ' • . i . . .i• . ' ~ , • ,.1 . . ~ ~ ;Y1`~ ' . ~ , ,lo ~ • i ~ ~a. . l'" ' 1 . . - a . ' . , I•` "11 . i+ ~ .,1.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ : ! .L ' . ' „ ~.a ai 'A , . ~e~ i' ~ ' 4". . : `k, n~r, , ,rr~"~~ •'rir~' s: , , . ~ • ~ , , . . , ' ; i - ' ,r ~ ' ~~1. , ' .;(5•~ ' • l ' f t • ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ . . ' J . + ' .~•o, ` • ~1.~, . 1~ n nI'~ ; ' . ' ~n . ~ , ~ , ~ ' .ti• . . u ,,l , , I . Yp 'Y. 1 • • . . .l '.1• r ~ ,.Y~S~ ~ ~ LY~ i. . ~ . . . , r: ~ , „ . '4 I, • ' ' j~,:~ , ~.t,. ' . ~v~'. . r ' ~ ' , ,.i ~ . . . ,''q :.,rf , ' - . ~ ~ i . ' ~4 \ . , , ..l'" , . . r',, .r . „n: . . . " . . . . t , • 'r. 'i . . , . • l ' 5., ~ ~ , . ~ . , tl , . . r. . ~ , ;~o , . ; ~ . ' , ~ • ' , ~1' . , - ' ~ . ' ~ • . • . , ; . ' ~ . , ~ . „ t.• , . ? ~ *,I , - t~. + ; `~i~.'. :r, , . . . ~ : . ~ y~ . , ~ . ~ ~ ' 7 :.a . , . 1' ~~0~.ip , i ~ . ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i. ,ii. , , . n- ~r. . 'k'. '4'~ 'i~ ''1' ' . W ,~'.%i.'~ •,i .1',. ..~~~f,;• . ~i' ~Ii ,1 , , . . r , 40 r f• , .a~ ~ t' i ' i ~,t ~ t'~ - i~ ~S. . , • , n~' .~'i. , . . ''t .~.i=;:;: •~i ~ . M ' . , 'Y . . 1 ~t y ~ 1 . t ' ~ 9~ ' ;~I i~ , ~i~ ~ ;4` I . f . `y ^ i t '.1I '1..,. r °1'~,~.' 1' ~ ~ . , ~ • . ~A1,j. 7 '1 . . . 1 ' .J. . " , • . • . ' :.^.f . . I i. . . , , . . LY. ~~...::~i y' ~t , 1 ' 1, ,f - ~ t ~ . . . . ~i`•: rl f' 1 . ~ , i . •Y•'' ..rrYr~i",~,; ~ ~ ~rp`,;'1i, ~ ' • k'',. • y,. , ~ • :ti•• ti IL .l ~41,.~ . ~ , . ~ .r~' - i'. - '~i ' t. L ~ , ~ ~ . , • ~ , ' , i :i.'..{'• •,~.,.j,',J•,i, :r" .~~ti 1: ~ 'i.d . ~ J~ ~ ,t, ~r . I t 1! 1~ .4 ~ ' i~f^, ~'t • ~ h ~ '~I'. '1 . ~ . • 1. . ' . . . . ' . ~ . ~ ~ . . . y V~''?, . . . • ~ .i 'j, •i~• 4.,~'' ~ ~ , . : . . . , ~ :1' ~F, i~,~~~~ ~ & . ri~,' • M , , , •'i. . • ~ ' • ' I. - • ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ' f iI , s~y ~ . 1 , ~ , , :.r,• . ' : ' n : ~ t , ~ ~ ~ i . ~ 4 , ~ /M . . ' _ i • 1-2- - , - - - . . '.t~~ . ~ ~ . v . r ~ ~~r ,5~.: . f~i . ~.l~ r ~ ~ ~ A ~ .y . . • ~ i . . . ' ,1~.. ! 'I r . ' • . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ • . ,11 t~~ ~ l. ~ . . t I~ r . ~ ' ' ' 1 t . L~~'.. ' r~•~ , ♦ . ~ i . j ` ~ ' ,211 1./ .i ~l• . , ~ ~ . A 'l i ~ ~ n'1 ; , ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ .I . ~ . . . . V. . i . • , a ' ~ y ~ t. , . . ~ . . + / ' . ~ Y f . - 0 ~ ~ i/ ~J, , ; ~1 • . ~ i~, ~ . ~ • ' C - . ' ~ , l ~ . . . 1 1~~1 ) e li* I ' t~' .ti; 9~.1 `•r f , i . • , • ' I'~1'~. . . `i ' . . ~ . Q . 1, to' Q * , , , - - ( • , . ~ F ` 11. ~ti ' ~ ~ ~ • . _ t'. ~ " . , ~~I • .1~. ? f . ! :I~. ' •*ti• .7I.. • . 'v ~~r ~r.' ' ~.I~ f. f' ~Il~ . .i:~ ~ . 1... ~ ' Y ~ , . ~ S' il'~~ * . `41 •f- 1 .L'l' ~ . . . S 1• ♦a- c u. , „ ~ . ~ ,.~:i . e i~ ~ u`. , ~ ~.1 ~ , ~ , P ' '.•y'. • t . r • . . ` ` ~ ~ ! . ~~r.~~ f1~i~ Y . ' , t n; I I:~•. ~l': 1 , 40110 ~ ~ ;i" , . :1 ~t-: ~ r '~r' • . ':i , ~ . . ~ • / ~ ~ s i f, . 1. 'li ~ . `q' J7i , i, ! •,4 . ' ) ` " ~A: ~i`, . 04 ,~',t, ~ 'i• C . , . q:ti ~1 ; ~ ~ o, . ~ ~ ~ ` • r., `'r ~ I .f ' ' t' 'r . , '~4 ~ . . ~ u , y~' a ,,'r: : r ~ ' r?': ,1• "I. ~ 't , i , , + / •:i ~5 . u •y .,i' + i~ "l 'r:' F ' r • " i,.' i ~ ~r i~ n' ,t',. i.~ p . ~'r, r 't~ •ti . I • "i ~ ~ i~; ~-i . ~ 7 • < ~ . • ~ ' . . '1 •,%h ~Y. ` .ti' , r . + ,r:' , t ~ `I. , :;i .;i~ ~ - . ~1 • x ~ r. ~ Y ~ i . 'b::' , , ~ . • -an . ~ . . ~i~ ' 't~ ~ 'r "ti ~,i ,s. 1. ~ ' i . ~ »4' ~~y . ~ . ' r , .t ',t ~ ~ Z 't i. ; • ~~l' ~~3.' ~r: ~U•. q ~ ~~e' rJ i { ' -D„ ' . . , ~ 1' f ~ , 'iY'i' . ~ "r. . ~ . . . • ~ .y~` • r , ' ' . •I- ~ :1' ~ " i` 1,' ' v . -7:~' . ~ ` ~t I., 1 t ~ ! . ~ : 'a •J' i• ; ;r'r .1~ . ~r~ ' f ' ~ 1 ('4 . ~•i .C . ~a' : t ~u ~ r..'V "ry f +1. ~ ~ - ~y / ~ ~ 1` t7 Y'V. ' . l~ ~~1' ~ ':j' . u 1, ,1 • ~ ~ j i ~ ' , 'f~ ' i• . I k "•1 ~ '1~ ' y~ ~ . ~ ~j i~. t:' ~ ~ . ~l i~ ! ~ ~f V '~I . ~ ~ i i ~ ' iF ' ~ , x Y. ~ . ~ - , ~ . i. 'C, ,~r I~, , . ' 1 0 ~:"1.~... • - : S ,''i - „ ,'r.• a . ~ ~ i . ' 'V . -~.i'; } 'i~~ •1"'•{~ • i. Iti~ ...t . '.i ~ f ':4'. : R ..f' ~.s~ ~a' , f'J.. i'- . • ~ o •n . : ~ r/~~ ~ . '1 ~f. . ~e• S~ 5 , 1. ' C,• sti .(i ~.t ~r ..t- ~'r''_ f• ~ti 'i. , lrr, ~ ` .r • 1'~ . ~t .i v.. w~ 1 . V,,' ;n : 'i'' ~T,;•' . ~a~ . q'S . . ,i , , ~ .,r• . ~'i t ~ ar.. ) ' 01, ' ~ • ^ 11I ~/1 , ~4 , I . ~ ~ • '~'l, ~ ~s ~i 0) :~i~ . 1~r~~~~ Y .,~I n ~.J.~.~ . t ~ r'{~ •.1 ~ !i . ' s. `~E, 1~~ '~t ~ I 1~ ~I' . •~~I ~ ~ ,t ! 1 _ • • . G •'J . v ' ~ M1 . ' `%f . ~ • 1 ,:i . .f~• ~ i cr `~~r' . . : " . ~ti ~ ~ , ` t: . ~ J. •T • i ~ ' ~ ~ ~ S' \ :V~ • '1 ~ , ~t s. '~~r . . ta~',~•i ~ : f . .%i~ i. r . I''~ '~t, r.' " ~6' . ~ . . ,4 . , . ~ti' ~ ~ , 4 - ~ .'r. , ; " •r,.~: „ , .~i:{;. , . ' : ' _ . _ ' i.,. . ' ' ti > ~ , . , , . . • ~ . } - .e'. . . , i y' ~y;~.; :i, F~ . ~ ~ 1.: . . r1 ' ~ ~ ' . Wti ' 4'`Il i I" \l, , ~i. ' . .i ~ , y~l, 'ti~ ~y' . ,~li ~r ~ ~ ~ . l .V.. . . J ' ~ ~t I~r. ' i:~~„ i~ ' ~ . ~ . r~~y ~1I,+ ~ . ~y~ :i' r. .1., . ; ~ r ~ ~ ,:i . 4r ~F~ t`I . , t~' • .44 i ' •.f''' f ~'EY . , , . 't-;1t.~ ~e ' 'I ~t . „ , ` J ~.r 1 F ~ n ~ . J' • i.. • iY ~ . , • , '~t" , ~~i ~ ' 'i' r a~ ~ . , •r'; , . - ' . , „ ~ :fj:.~e .i~ , . , . ' ~ ' 5' ~ . \i ~ .I~ } , , ~ 1~ ~ 'L' ; ~ . , f ~ ''1 i~~ . I ' ' ~ . . P ' . t' , ~ 'r • . . > , , , ~ . r' '•j~ ~ . 5~. , l' ~ 7~ . ~ . . i •Y' • ~ . .i. `l~ v~~ti~ ~f. t, ,1 ' . „ ti~, i. \ . , i - . x . _ . i~ ,r S. '1~f ~7,.' , ~ , .r" : ~i R, . , , r . ~ . - •i,. . 1 I ~ ~ , ~ . ' • , 1 , y : . , I ~ r . I. 1 ~ ~ . '1 •C . . . A I' ' ~ ~ , ~ . , " ' . i . . ' . , . ~ ~ ;'1 ~ t. ' , • i:,; 4 ~ , ' F',.i,. , i i ~.x~ f~.i 4:.' ~2: ; . " " ' . , . . _ ' ut .t' ' . , . ,I- , S ~I•j~ , il ~ _ ',f - • i5•,%' ~ ~ ~ ~ si' . . ~ . ,t' „ '4,';, ;`.r~z' !q'' •i• "j•, s~ ,'c • • . i f..•'.~~~4 • ~ . , ~ . ~ , ' ~1~ . ' . , , , .t r _g ~~I, a• . Fw .'ti-:' ~ -11 .l '.t:~i; ; ~ .i: . " Q:;4 ~i t . ' . . ~ . . , ~ .~J . ,~1' . ~ . ~ i' ~"~'.(~Y ~y , . . - ~ , ~ ~n~ y~': v~' 'f•~ '~h~ , , •,t.. ~ + ' ' .•~pp ' ' , . ~~i' 'j• 1.Y.' '+.i' ~1 . 'i . . , , . ~,i - ~'r ~ .~'.u ~ 1 t Y' ~:;'••c.,r~` '.r'~.~•, > • ' " ~ ~t ~ . . . i ,d: , . ',~v,.:j,. . , ~a . ,~ti ' . Y , ^ ~ 'y "ti ~ . ~ .i 7, ~ ~ ~a • . , . ' ,,i' < '•i, ~ .:t, 5'?'• , , , . a~ .i: ; , p ~ .~o. ~ ' ~•,:5. , , ~ . •;j'~,; ; a•h:~ :r . , ,r I ~ , . ',i~" , \ `r..Y f, .'1 `~.4' !Y~ ,S'. ` , . f. I. r . k.~ 'i . YM11 ~ '1 a. . y^ , ~t~ . • . ~ t . ~ •Y .i~n , 'p .~1 i .l . I ( ~~i ~ , A1 . ~ (V , , i .'Y` .'j. . r•, . `r y" r;• ,i,:~a~ . •,jr.,: , • 7 , .4.^;,.. _ 't. , .1~ .,'i~ '1 . ' 1' n~~.' ~e " ~ ^ . . , . • ~ ~;i. V ; ' ' ~ ~ ~~•i, .i::r s~~ r •t r ' ,t:~ . 1 , , ^ 'f' , ~ ~ ; t , ' ~1 , ,+~y . r , w ~ ~ . • i'~ , ~ . ~'A . • ~ t~ , ~ ~.~i' i •'1" ' . 'r t' : f, ~ t =r.~.~, , . . , ~ : . . i. . ~ ~ :r~ ~r • f'1l~• ~ ~4" t~ ~ . :,1., ' ~ 1 • .~illt. , : rn. i. ' w . .~i< ~ t • ~ -t .t;: . ~ ~ ' ,1 :J~ "f'.t l . . 1J ~1 • i .l. I ~ 1. t •1~.1~• • t' 1 r 1 . ~ ~ 'I. ` r .N~, ~ .~r,.~ ~ 4~~ .5: ' . .3 ; ~ . Y' •/At '1 ~:5~ ~i'~. . •a~ ~ 1 ,t:~ ~ . ' y ~ t~~~ ~ 1 ~ v _ ~iY~~ I'': S 'G. 'Yt ~ ti. r~ „ , "i ~ `t . t . ii ~ i.~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ . _ •f . ~f~ ` ~ ~ •I:' . .t . ~ . ,t' ~'J,' 7 i ~ : :1 • ".~f, ~ ~ ~ ,4'~ '.~1~ ' .}r , ~ i . . ~'a . . . . ' •%,.ni - . '~4 ' ~ •t 'r' ~J~. '~f, ~i ~ ~ r . . , ~ ' ~ f ~ ' ' . 'J t ~r 'i ~•if: ' ' . , . '4 I j1 : , y ( ~ , r ~~t •~f :l ~ 1' . . . . . r . " I,+ Y . ~ • 7 ~ .J ~ I , I . . ' . }I.. , ' • , - , . ` , ]f . .~1 ~ i .l..~ . . I i . ~ ' .i . ~ • .f:l . ~ ~ . n ' . . I' ~1" . - ~,f• - . . . . y . , . ~ . _ , J . , . , Z15,001. , , ~ ~ , _ f7` . ~~L~~ , ~ , . , ' . , ' • ~ ' , • ~ , . , r . t • ~ . ' . ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ ' ~ 5 ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' . . . ' I • . , ' • ' .A i-' • , . , ' • .i.. . . ' , ' - • . ' ' ' 1 ` , , ~ . ~ I' : '.'',y . ' ' , ' ' . . ' , . ' i . I 4 ' ' . - , " ; . , : . . • ' I . . 4• ``~1 NORTHWEST SOILS, TESTING & INSPECTION September 9, 2002 Proposal No.: P-02078 Mr. Buster Heitman . Landmark Development . 8225 North Division Street Spokane, WA 99208 Re: Proposal for Construction Inspection . Shelley Lake Fourth Addition Spokane County, Washington Dear Mr. Heitman: • As requested, we have prepared this proposal to provide construction inspection services for the proposed Shelley Lake Fourth Addition subdivision located in Section 24, T. 25 N., R 44 E., W.M., Spokane County, Washington. This proposal summarizes our estimated scope of work and associated costs. 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES Our proposed scope of work was developed based on review of undated plans prepared by CLC Associates, Inc. The following sections detail our proposed scope to address each inspection item. - We will provide construction observation and material testing services as outlined below. A. Construction Observation Services: 1. Earthwork and subgrade preparation. 2. Placement and compaction of all base material and pavement. 3. Placement and compaction of sewer and water backfill. 4. Verification of side services and marker posts. 5. Curb and sidewalk installation. . 6. Drywells, inlets, and general facilities. 7. Temporary drainage facilities. 8. Erosion control. 9. Coordination with Spokane County. . 10. Preparation and submittal of street - and drainage record drawings, preparation and submittal of sewer record drawings including County mandated U-16 forms. 11. Soil and material testing for compaction and backfill for items 1 through 5. 2214 East Riverside Avenue • Spokane, WA 99202 • Phone (509) 534-9711 • Fax (509) 534-9755 A Division of CLC Associates Inc. . . Quster Hcitrnan Scptember 9, 2002 Shelley Lake Fourth Addition Construction Inspection Y-02078 STI Northwest Page 2 B. Direct Expense Mileage will be billed at the established rate at time of billing (currently $0.40 per mile). - Actual reproduction costs with a 15 percent markup. 2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK Construction observation by STI Northwest personnel or other agency personnel shall not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to construct the facilities covered by this agreement to the line and grade shown on the approved plans or as staked by the engineer. This contract agreement does not include construction management, scheduling activities, or preparation of irrigation Record Drawings. 1. The scope of these construction engineering services includes: A) Periodic observation and reporting of specific construction activities on this project which include subgrade, bases, pavement, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm drainage, and material testing; B) Maintenance of all construction records related to construction activities outlined in paragraph "A" above, which may include daily inspection reports, manufacturers' certifications, material test reports, and correspondence; C) Assurance that the construction of the roads is according to the approved plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineers, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual; D) Development of post construction record drawings for sewer, water, street and storm drainage facilities; it is understood the facilities inspected by firms other than STI Northwest will be certified by those firms in a form acceptable to Spokane County; E) Coordination of the testing of construction materials for compliance to the . plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, Standard Specifrcations, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual. Prior to acceptance of the road and drainage facilities by Spokane County, we will submit all construction records and the record drawings to the Spokane County Engineer. ' Buster Heitman September 9, 2002 Shelley Lake Fourth Addition Construction Inspection P-02078 STI Northwest Page 3 Any re-testing required by inadequate work, requests for inspection when the contractor is not ready or requests for services not specifically stated in this document will be billed separately as a special service. It is your responsibility to arrange for any back-billing to the contractor or material supplier. We will coordinate our inspections through you or your general contractor. Any requests for inspection on work performed by sub-contractors must be forwarded through you or your general contractor. Unless we are notified otherwise, we will assume that your general contractor has been given authority to act as the owners' representative and all field or general communications concerning the construction activities will be directed through him. The construction observation and material testing services are billed on a time and expense basis. A monthly invoice will be prepared and sent to you for these services. The invoice is due within 30 days of the invoice date. We require a 24-hour notice for scheduling construction observation services. The services described herein will be performed as needed and billed on the basis of time and expense. Labor and lab testing services will be billed at the established rate at time of billing (currently $45.00 per hour for a technician, $65.00 per hour for the Project Manager and $110.00 per hour for a geotechnical engineer). We estimate the cost of construction observation services as outlined above to be approximately $13,000.00. This estimate is based on $3,600.00 for sanitary sewer inspection, $1,250.00 for storm drainage and subgrade preparation, $1,600.00 for curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and $1,850.00 for gravel and paving inspection. We also estimate that our costs associated with sewer as-builts and certification to be $2,100.00, and $2,600.00 for project certification, submittals and project closeout. We will not exceed our $13,000.00 total estimate without your authorization. This cost does not include costs associated with bond reduction requests or drywell testing. If requested, these services will be billed as a special service. It is understood that any project facilities constructed without adequate construction observation and documentation by STI Northwest will be removed and reconstructed in accordance with approved project plans and Spokane County Specifications, or STI will not be responsible for project certification or submission of record drawings to the County Engineer. • . Busier Heitman September 9, 2002 Shelley Lake Fourth Addition Construction Inspection P-02078 STI Nonhwest Page 4 REWIARKS We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal, and we look forward to serving your inspection needs. For your convenience, we have submitted two copies of this proposal letter. Our services can be authorized by having an appropriate representative sign and return one copy to us. Please understand that the authorizing organization assumes ultimate responsibility for payment of our services. if you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, . Accepted by, STI Northwest Bob Graham (Signature and Date) Civil Projects Manager A7 , Paul T. Nelson, P.E. (Name and Title) Associate WORK AUTHORIZATION ATTACHMENT "B" NOTICE TO OWNER OF RIGHT TO CLAIM A LIEN IMPORTANT: READ BOTH PAGES OF THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY TO: Landmark Development TO: Buster Heitman Owner AgenUContractor FROM: STI NORTHWEST DATE: Sept. 9, 2002 PROJECT: Shellev Lake Fourth Add't~ion PROJECT THIS IS NOT A LIEN: This notice is sent to you to tell you who is providing professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of your property and to advise you of the rights of these persons and your responsibilities. Also take note that laborers on your project may claim a lien without sending you a notice. OWNER/OCCUPIER OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: Under Washington law, those who furnish labor, professional services, materiafs or equipment for the repair, remodel, or alteration of your owner-occupied principal residence and who are not paid, have a right to enforce their claim for payment against your property. This claim is known as a construction lien. The law limits the amount that a lien claimant can claim against your 'property. Claims may only be made against that portion of the contract price you have not yet paid to your prime contractor as of the time this notice was given to you or three days after this notice was mailed to you. Review the second page of this notice for more information and ways to avoid lien claims. . COMMERCIAL AND/OR NEW RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: We have or will be providing professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of your commercial or new residential project. In the event you or your contractor fail to pay us, . we may file a lien against your property. A lien may be claimed for all professional services, materials or equipment furnished after a date that is sixty days before this notice was given to you or mailed to you, unless the improvement to 'your property is the . construction of a new single-family residence, then ten days before this notice was given to you or mailed to you. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON NEXT PAGE STI ATTACHMENT 6 PAGE 1 OF 2 SENDER: 5T1 NORTHVVEST ADDRESS. 2214 East RiveTside SPOKANE, WA 99202 - TELEPHONE; (509) 534-9711 Brief description af prvfessional~ervices, materials, or equipment provided or to be provided: Prvfessional engfneering and retated services. IMPORTANT INFORMATiON FOR YOL1R PROTECTION: This notice is sent to infarm }rvu tha# rnre have or wil] provide professronal servicesT ma#erials or equipment for the irnprovement of your property. VV'~ expect #o be paid by the persoro who ordered our services, but if we are not paidt we have the right to enforce our elaim by filing a cvnstruction lien against your prvperty. LEARN more about the lien laws and the meaning of this natice by discussing thern with your cantractor, suppliers, Qepartment of Labor and Indusfries, the firm sending you this nofice, your lender, or your aftorney. COIUIMON METHOaS TO AVOID CONSTRUCTION LIENS. There are several methods avaifable to pratect your property frorrt construction liens. The follawing are t+vo of the more comrnonly used methods. DllAL RA1fCHECK (Joint Checks): IIVhen payEng your contractor far services vr matedals, }rou may make checks payable to the contracfor and the firms furnishing yau this natice. LIEN RELE14SES: You may require your con#ractor #o provide lien releases signed by ali the suppIiers and subcan#ractors frorn whom you have reGeived #his notice. Ifi they cannot abtaan lien releases because yau harre not paid #hem, you rnay use the dual payee check methvd to proteet yourself. , YE]U SHOULD TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY FROlVI LIEIVS, YOUR PRIME CONTRACTOR AND YC]UR CONSTRUCTION LENDER ARE REQUIRED ~Y LAVId TD CiVE YOU WR[TTEN IhlFORMATION ABOUT LIEN CLAIMS. IF YOU HAVE NOT RECE1VED IT, I~SK THEM FOR IT. sTi AT-FACHMENT 6 PAGE 2OF 2 , - ' ,,s..~ . ' . . . . . : • • , : ' . . ;y;;,'; _ . . - _ . - _ . _ . - . ~ ~ _ t-a:r~.~ - . - . . : ~ . _ ~ _ ' : _ _ , . . • . , _ r-'- - . 'i .a ~ - ~ , •i,~ 'i.. . ' _ , , L, _ ♦ . . ~ j;~ `r. • • M1 , • . ' • • t • ~ I . . •~y1~.. ' f}~ I _ . I ,.I1~ i-• _ ~ ~~t- . •t••''4• - ~ r - ' " _ -~t v.. , ~o, ' ~ 'J ~ 'i• ~tv~ I . • . • . . t . - I , T . I: - _ - 1 ~.4~~ ~t1t~.11~. . . - . . . _ "~ti:. . _ . . _~s~~ _ =a._ . . . - ,N- - ~~e ° 1 _ , ~ . . ` . ~ a= +r': V"~. .N: ' . " .5.., ~ . . . . ' . ~ r' ,;1•,~ Fii ' . - . r,- ~ ~.2 ti ' ~ j. J . • : . -•i .'r~.j' ' ' ' . ; , . ' r- ; _ •T: • ~ , _ .rs;; ~ . • _ . . • . ~ . ~ ; . -1 . . 11 - * n -i~ ^ . ` . - ~ . P' . • .r: s~. . , ' . ~ . ~ ..4. + t •S - _ - " , i 1 . • . . ' : . . ' . • - •.t` ` . 't . . " ' _ . . . . ! T~~ .Y`. _ . ~ t. . ~ : - ♦ . . . 51 ~.t •t~ . . - ~ • ' , _ - • t 1 ' h • . r " nf '-i.` . ' ~ ~ , ~t. ' i •.f. ' . ' _ i .i1 ' ,t.~ ' i; ` . e tiT, :F' .~S % i~'-: Y~ ~1 • ' ~ . - . . • . . 1',' - 6: A , ; !"'r , ' ~ K ) "f.." ♦ . - ~ ~•1R•~ ( . . ~ i~V. 4 .f ~S • ' -~'Y' ~ 1 . . t't• f.t" ~L2..'T ~ S-"', _ _rt..^~~ ~i Sr. . _ _ =a _ t. ~ y ..-~liv t `Ss''~.7' ~ ' • . i ' .O ~ ~~t! ':1' 't.' t~ ~ f" " J'~ .t . t. " . - ~i'~ .S :S`.~ t,' - - y~ y `4 . , -:;,.:~z :k : - . z e' . {i.~ r•4 • S r } -.t-':' ir.l ~ L ti, r ~R. O , . u .o 1' - - - Y ~ L• • U • =~`~r A 22i A. as~. -Q`~ or, . _ , ~N :99.?_ rr' ' I - `n . ry i - ~ , - ~~i~ - ~f~ ; r ' s~:~ "o e~ a~. ' . ~ ~ ::te I~' ~ ~ . as . : ' ~ - y - d .t .1~.., y„ . ~s<~ _ '.an s~'ereb- ~,m~ .r . P~ . dg~- ac~.. - ~~r.~~~ ~ ~ - ersta~: 'h ~`eia~t . `-4~~ ~ . ; , ~aCa u~ iri .a ~a~ - o~k ~ . . - 534 ~:z: - .?mutt~ - etYie~~N . . , 't5o~!) s r. T~ ~ t~►e= - - ~ ~~s-.of'app . _Y ~ 'r ~o~ au~Tionz ~ - . . . w,.~. . ~ a es;_-.,: ~ ~to=~~~te 's'ovi~ion, - ~i~w4 e~t t - . _ . . , ~ ~ :,°c~ef.utlY - ~Tr ;t~l;or~ . . , - ~ 'for,~a~oia,. e ; ~t~cS: F' P ~ati ; o~i;xo~ << s" . . . . ~ , . . - ;~~::~~iis_r►~. _a~ - - - hor.iiation:r~.ate. ch ~:~;uthon~. >-_,:4~:~;,. --n. . . . . ~ ~ase:-.rev+~ - ~Nork- A~t ~T'.i~ial:Wo . ~ ; -P y.>°~: ~ ~ ~ - . . . • : ' . . P!~ , t ~le"~to:tli~s .;:r~ -s~~_..ri~~::o !9 = . . . ~ . ` , , _ . - :a ~a~ lica,b... - ~ eti ~a ~ . . - `ents~ p.P _ r-. . ~~:r.,;.~ - . - . _ ~cfiim ; . .Piease~ . _ ~ : z==° . . . , _'~.~'A~a 11 'ia~ion. , : ~ _ ~ ~ ;i: .i . . ~ . - . hon _ . ~ , . . . . . c Tk.Ai~t.. . - . - . . :17Vb , k~ „ tJ .1"~s : r,'- =t.^ a a - ~-t_. 'of . :~J ~ . . . ' " -a t- . - _ rt. . ~f ` ~-a ; 'S _ , ' _ . ' . - • . . . ' • ~ i ' . . .L:' •r . ` ( ` , . 2 `.Y' - , . 1 v , : .4 . ry - - - - f1` , t•. :J.. "1r • . . ~ =1~~ r:~ ~ ' 23 . - , . ' i . - -2 : " ~:r~ _ - _ .:;r,.. - - - .4fi7 . e 9 ~ : ~9 . . ~i.; n ; r~t'" 'F' plla~,~Yi ' ~ v ~ ,r_ ' ;r, - - . . _ - . - , - • :z: . :~one - ~ . . s~ : = , .>,-,i '~~J - -Ph . . . •rl ~ 'l:i•~• : 'ii~ •'~,'H,' ~t' . dr~. "tt:0•,t 't. ' :Y' f J' 1. _ . _.i'.` , ~ ~ ~ . . i. ~ i _ h 2 , / ,'t t ^ . ~ •1` ' _ ' 'S"' ' ` " _ ' . ' . _ O = '..t'~~' I~ - . }7+• •.•J ~ ~•2~. ♦ f' .f' ~ . .U.' SG , • '.iEr~`{~ ~ L i w•i: ♦ • ~ . . . .t: : . • ~ . Jv rl' " . .a. . 4. _ Ms'. • t - . ' ~ ~ , . . "t"~WFQR ~ r• . ~t , . ' ' _ ' . . .pRO . ~:1.. :i.: t~~~ ~ ,Y ~ . . . . _ - . . . . - ~srlr' F1P~P . ~ . ~ - .t. :gg20S.~ ~ ~ - =:;-~:l; " - - - :ti~~ a~ , ~ ~{iiii ~'toi~ ; , ~R~ ~467-2123 - ~ - . - : z - ; ~~n~:~as .4 - . - ; : . ~~5~) . . ~ ' - ~t-Na~~'-. . r : S~soka - . - ~Phone: - _ . , - . . ~~iien .s::f~•:~ J;.s '~~•~ceet. . - _ - J.. . - . _ ~ _ - - : , . _ „ . . .;r . I ~ . _ ~ • , .i.:..! ~il' r1~~O1'lfi~'D"v,~sio _ ~ ~ - - ,.a % - .'J. - - - ' i- t • , _ .`c__ • - ~•1 ` "•~Y •A •~~tGVa 'C'! QtCc• ,~i.~V - f , • ' •r~.:t~. • s , •r` ♦ .l~' 4 r 1 . • ' . I • • . . _ ' - Y ~ . % _ , • - .Y. ..1 ~ , . . F . Bitlin , ; • ~ n-=. - f:. - ° . . _ , . r~: '1~ ptt .1U~~a'i . _ . , • _ ~ster-He ..4• h ^ - . - : , - , . . ••Q4 ,;i• _ . r. • , • • r~• ' ntativ . - _ . i ; . - . . . . . . - ~'e rese f.-~_:' ; : _ ~:K' _ ~z~3~~ . > ~ni's:R ,p. .-K ;V~ , . - . . . ~~.Ctie. . ~ ~above~ ~ . _ _ . . , . . ~ • . . . ~ . •as , z: ~=:•R.":-: i~ , . . - - - -Saiine . s:.- _ . . . . . _ . . . . . . . ~`Adtiress. _ << - S testr~ic#. . _ . . . . ~t~~ie:s _ - atenat - - _ ~ - . . . . ~esen. ~..r. - - ~nd. -ir~ _ . _ _ . R~Pr ? -y~,~ ^ [~`ectior~= ~ r~: ~ :~t . • = - ~ , . . . , : . . = t- - : ' . - 'i~:' -e , • n , •~\,ST'" • ' ' i• _,y' , _ . ?:,•::r.:.;~7~ ,t - •li~` _ _ ` . - 1~ . . ' . _ . . : Cl:` .'C - =i . - T - • • . . `A' 1. " Des ~Crl ~l0 - • . , - > . - . - . _ x_ - P _ . - . - . . . YY' '~i,='}. . • _ , _ _ . _ : K . , _ , . „ _ . , . „ • . ;e- a/~ 'l: . . . . . )y •l~\.- , . . . . . i1.. . ~ . . . . _ ' . . ~ ''r,.I.. . .t.°" ~ • • " . ~ '."Lr " . ' . . Y . • - , . " . Y ,-'t ~ : t ~ ' V~~_ ' , ti''. . . . " " • " ' .r . . . . • ' ' • , ^ - . _ . ~ - ~ . ~ . _ - - - ashinc~ton-~~ - - - - - . • ' . • . ' e - . : ,t.~• . . ~ ir • - ~t f ~VOl.~1~~• ~ r, - ~ Ja;' • _ _ . . , . . . ~ . ~ ~ - ~ ` ~ y=~QOkane . ~ . , -s~. - ~ . . . - , ~ . _ - _ . . ~ ~ . ' ~ - ~:ourtti ~Addition:- . ~ - - . : . • . . . . - . - . ~ . . . , I . _ . L~ ~~~F . I ' . ~ 1~~..' ~ - * . . . , _ • . : I ' . ~ - _ . - - . - " ~ ' ~ ' . . • , - . ~ - L7 - - ~Shelley ~Ce - - 5: . ' . . s, ~ ' - {~./~y~`i,r~O{.~0~" " f , " _ Y~~f: ~T, .~w , ~ t. ` _ " • ~ ' S'; 'L..• 'j~4, ~f4-,. . ' " . - . ~ . . ' LOVYMOn j . l~. , ~1 N-C • , " . . ' . . ' ~ l~'•~•` If" ♦ ' . - . r . . , ~ ` - . . I . . : ss~~~~fees ~ . : . - . . - . • . . . ~ . I .:Frn~~... - - a = ~d:~rc~ce. , - . ~ ~ t : . _ . . , - . . : . . _ . : ~ . ~ - • . _ . . p _ . : ~ _ ts: _ .r . . ~ : . .F : , . . . qro ~ved--.p~ans:. ~e _ . : . - . . . . . - - ~ ' ' p~ovide:~.~ A~ . . : ±;t. . ~ - . , . . a~ . , - ; . . - . i . . _ . . _ Clie~'►.t;Wil,4' . . - . . , , _ , , _ r . -:T:. . ' . , ~ . , . , _ ~ . • . - - . _a 'r~' , . ';y _ '.fr' . r • • - ' . . 11 - ' • ; ' - . ' . I , . • - , . . . .J, _ • . . _ Y • • ' . . , . • • ' • ,e . ' , ~ ~~heeked.t - ' . - _ - , : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CHMENY ~ . _ : -~fion~ '?~~st~be. . . . , ~ ~ *dated: 9l910 . _ - ~CqBLE: A~:A ,,,ofk~ Au tlioriia. ~ = ~ '1 ' 7n. ~ :.coosa1. tette . ` . . : APP.L _ -a ._j `:to:this . :;y SN~. ,~;;See..p v~ K . _ . 2. . S ~hicti~~ , PP y~~- ~...~1-. . - - ~CHM E~T-~' A - . • : p . - . - t-: . ~ , . - . 'Rtta,cF~rne~.t.,, : < . ~ ; ~ - ; S~-'"~~=qT~A < ~ - _ - . . . . ~ _ . . . . - 'RK: ~4:{M~.NT=;, 8:: ~ ~ - . . . . . . . . - , . - ~QN :4F = ~ ^ :~`S,EE p~~AC. ~ : _ . . . • * • • ~ - - . - . . . . . G-:p~ ~Ci~tPT . . - - . . + . ~ I ' - ~ . . ~ . _ ~ _ `.F~. ~.r.. , . _ ' - ~.t,- , t . , . . . . , _ . . , . _ pE .~y~ . ' . ~t', . . _ O~~~R~ ~ yf' 3 - ; _ _ : i` ~ ~ _ . . ~ . . . . - ~ CE:~.~. - . . ~ _ - . . - ~ _ . ~ ~ . ~ - . ; , ;,1 , - _ . . ^ • . - !r s . . - . - . - - - , - . . . ~ ~ • i ' . - ' • . • i . . ~ ~ ~ . , ~r i~` ~s'. . . . . :FEE.-<, . . . . - ~ . , - , . pOS~O . _ < . . _ _ . , : . . : . : r~ ":t~ ~ e'. ~ age5 , ' ~ . .3. , PRO , , ~ ~ - - - _ ~ ~ . x _ ~ ~ , . ~~.~'ti~.att;~iV _ P . 13~OUQ:OQ;=: .l~.< :4-.r. ,~::y _ abave:an . , _ - . - =:FEE;' - " ' . a,cated . _ . ~ V1CE S. :i:<<:. ~fs'a~.:m,~. - ~rrec: . , i.:;.~ . _ - ••x• +'at~achinen e'and~~. ~ . . I t• ~S1C_SE~? . . F~ v t' OR 1?J~TlOt~, . ~'aPPt~ o~cable:_ r~ ~ 'zatiori`is~tru!: _ . . . . - ~RK~pUTH ~es ~of all~;- :=ttio~ _ , _ ~ ~ t~r`~ . , ,O~'-'w.~ ived-coP,- , . s_ ~iKi.~.tt±e,W 1...- , "f ; ~Y ~ ~CUT10N ~~has.{eice _ t "ctuded ; u ~ s: . q; -E~E ~.that he~ ~ a#iofif-i!~ . .r 1~-.f ~ • . , ~ , - - ~ . 'nfi~ms ~ - 11'inforr~ - . _ _ ~=:~r - - ~ ~ - - T~~~. ~<that=a iz: _ . _ - . . lFN nd. z.;: _ =5 . ~ t . . -The. y{.~ ':~foim~;~ 4 - --:r;=-~.',-, - . - , . . A "ori~ation _ , ~4~= ~ ~.r= . _ - Ulll l •.~.•c e - rn ~ , . . . ,t'-' . .b. j sTS..si . s ~O{~~~,~"~ ' ' •.c 2 `e ~S.: . '•T. f_ . ' . ~ ~ of.'th ~ , _ + -,r:.-t• • • • . ^ . . .f~ . f . . '.F ~:J~ aY• \irti "'tf~. :.;A. .~~.Y:...% Q•4 l ~ ~ ~ ~ • • .''w . S•-•: ~ : . ..7~. {P : tV~.. -i•'t• ~l . . r 1 A'- • °17 • 1 '~l~~'. .t•, ~`Y',• ~ ^Y'. " ,1•-•~ ,l• . . - .4' . w~... ~1~` •y• k ' . ~ J y f ' S . . • - ' ' _ F'!.`~ I = +n~ y I' . Y^'1 . ~r~ • 'I. ~ _ . : i" r~S•y . d ..l. _ - - y: .,fr..T 4` _ • ~ ~ - : ~ . . " ~ ~a~' _ ; , . ~c vel o~~ . , P V - ~-pe~~ ~ ma ;i '~n Y - - i ~~a . . - ~T: . ~..t ' :'L . _ ~:i. - = . . _ :Y✓ ti~.. ~a r r . _ ~ : .;~'F - L ~ , . ' ~ -t N a .:;._z ~ _ - ~E . . . . . . . - `E , - _ .s. ~ . . ~ r, , _ - . - . ~Y . . . _ .i~ . - . . # - . . , V , . - ' f~ . , _ L;. _ a i?" - . . . . . , , - .:;,d- , . r.1 - . ' - ' _r•r 'I'. r ,1 _ - . - .a i; y; 'y~-~~.r . ; = • • ' Ky., i ? • • , • j'~• - r k. ` • • - ' . 1t• - - . " t,' . . • ' 1~_ : 'L ' ' ~J . ~ ,''y a~ L • a~' . . ..8. nc~ e. n ,r ° _ ~ , ~ . . :1' _ _ . _ . .l% - _ o. . - - C.`- 2•' . 1 lJ -1= - . - ''O - • t: M~N,~ 'T •'r ' ' ":n'~ : te~ •t"9°• , . . , _ : :p~ , , ~pssoeia - -=Sep . •,-TY . _ tl'er ~r: ~ . > -r • ~c~:~ - . - • GIN . = . ~s~~_ 4'4P~~. . . . '~EN :r. ~ ' : y~ - . . . . - - " • te~.1/V$p:r, j - . ' ~ Da - - ~ ~ _ ~ - - . . . . , ~ . - - . • . ' - _ _ ~ • • S ' _ j ,p:• ' ; ~ ~•r ~ ~ ~ "'y . » . . . . - • • - , . • . . : ' i .r,' ~ . :s• ' " _f:' ~ ,~r,=::q ~ f'~. s • _ - . . . . • ` Q , • _.i ~ . ~ - -r• • - .~~+Sf•• ~ ~Ob - ~.~i - . ~ - , - , ~jy: . ':I: . .3• a: ~i' r t,' .t- ~r'~ ~ . s • • . - ' x 4 - • ; •"t . . . ~ .CttE c•'r. - - - , ~ - - . .:f~om _ . . ~:'r _ ~ -.:~::i~. - - . - rece~ye ~ . ,:i~` . . . : ' . 't _ - . - . . . ~-W . =A~R _ - . _ t -z~ :r -r . - , . . . . . - - _ . _;~-K> -.y ~ .S . . . . - . . . _ . ~aate.3 - - . ~ : ition~-; _ ~h~:l~dii - - . - . . , _ L Fou~t , _ ~t. ~3~.- . _ . - - ~L ake= _ - _ _ . _ . ~ . . . ~etleV' x : : • . - l.% _ - ~K . _ . - 4~ - - -~N~a~e:. J _ - ' ~ ' ar- _ . i-: ~ . 16 . . - ~ ~ .c _ i ' . . , r , ` ' ' ' . ` - "i'_T - - 'r ' " " "t- - , r' , ;r _ , , - . ,'A-j' . 'i ..i.' ~ ~ : a.+~ 'G: ~S•S~s•. " ~ ' • - r` 5... . , • • ,,r• . ~ ~=t~ , ' ' . t • ' r!' - 'J` `7 . . ~:l,,`^ ~p• • I . • - . . ' ' ° . - ' - •~:t , " . } ' ' ' T' ' r ' ' . ' 'r1 _ ' : - . 'y.' , . . .i I ' :Y . ~`i . %y - - ' . ' ' . _ • ' ' }i:~;~ ~i~ . : • ' ' ~ L.. <f. . ' . ' . , . . • - ' - ..s.'! :i•..r..+1-t. ~ .s. ' ' . . ' , . . t • 9 _ . . - . . • :SF_ti•" 'i'~ ' • •J`' - ' , ' ' ' , _ , • . s _ .'t' , ! .r~ , . , ~ ' . ~ . , 'j - - • 't : z'- - - - - t: - , : ~ - ; - ~~C: _ . . ' . - _ - . - r ~ ~..r`.i - , °S..-~ ' _ . , „+v.I Q7 .ii ' , I _ c. I . - t. ~ _ . , k ' ~4 :'r ~r pTit?NY : . 21 " ' ;,R ~ . . . . . . . , _ . , _ . ,~'THO~ . ~ - . , _ . , . , , - . - . , .~y^ ~ "rj ~~10~.. 'r ~ • ti~;' - ~ •t r , . . . i . , • . - . - - - • . . •S . . '°A~~GiE~~,OF'S~.: ; - . . • . • ~ ~ " - ' . . . . _ . " . . ~ ~^7 } "f'} 4~ • • • - . . ~ • • . . . ' y . • „ ^f _ • •f . ' . y' • , I Y' , _ - , . _ ` , - AA1 .x~ , . . '1i• . l^ . - . ` . _ . . . . I _~1 ~ ' ' • ' L• . •.Y . . •_y, ~.5,-:. 3 ' . : . . , t . . . . . . ~ . ' . _ ~ " I " . , . 1' . • • '-3 • • - ,.fJ. . re , • . . ' •t . • . , ' . • ~ I . ~ ' . . . . . - ~ 5_•' BASlC-SERVICESAND-SPEC~? SERVICES ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ , ~ ' . . . ~ . . , - ~ . r . . ~ . - - , ~ - • . ~ . ~ . , . ~ j, . ~ ~ . ~ . . . ' • ' ' ' ' ' . • ` ' ' • ~ • . . ' . ~ • y ' 4' . . ~ • ' • • . , - ' . • . . ' . . ' ' ' . - ~ - : t" ~ ~ ' . , , e. . ~ . Engineering.BASIC ~SERV~~~ES-sliall be-th~ose~.'services;.whieh ~are"weiltime''of-exec iution of t1i~:~1IV.ORK~ - ~ . , . _ . . . ~ - AUTHORIZATIO.Nafor-whicM .8TI-: Northwest~: heremafter: refer'red, to :as tFie=ENGINEEa; ~can establish~ a~~.f~.~XQd--fee,' - maximum~'buiiget.:'to;perforin~~BA SERVICE~:- :-Unless:: other.v►rise.~nofed~"`fhe:.BAS1 :FE~~ "ti ' - SIC~; _ C-.~~ ~~'s a11~~~~epcesent~.;fu11 ~ ~,com ~ ensation~~foi~~'er•fol~mance~-of'the:--BASIC SERVICES--on: a one.:time~~onl~ basis:` ~~The "ENGIN~ER.~ ma e`ff % . P ~ . p__ . . . . . ~ - _ . . . . . Y- ~ . ~ ~ . , _ " Y~.'P. orm;:~`,. . _ , ~ ::~dditiorial:.~services :in°'addition to .ttie-`B~ASIC~:SE~tVtCES~„wti.en~~th~e: scop6-of .the.'work- ~equir`ed°exceeds-~the,.;-_B~ISIC~~~-~ 'SERVI~CES outEin~ed:.in~~this':Work~a~ltti-orization;y~hen'applicable; and Atta`ch~ment-"A!~ These~additional;;se`ryices:shall~ refe~red:~to~as,=SPECIAL; SERVICES :and: stiall~ be;pet~oFrried~~•as,-qeeded: or ~s, ~rey~iE§ted: bji. tfie`CLI ENT,ot his*;a erit _ . ~ -on`,a-;.time..and...expense:*basis: . SRECIAL'SERVI~ES. .-FEES~bas'ed'on; #ime`~;arid•,ezp~en~e^'sliall_'mean":ttiaf'~fhe f~e.-~ :.cha_r" d'is co;m~ ~uted":based~=on tfietofaf~-nurnber,of'houTS-~re *ui`r.ed~ b~:eacF~~eia;i ~o ee'xo:accomlish-the~'~e~~uited"wor`' . ,9,.e . P q Y _ .P1. Y. - -P: ~ q . k < -..Pus~.an:,=alloiiv,ance;.fo~r' oyerbe'ad~ and':profi~iLp~1us;-_ek ense~ :dir,ectlY ~`~=at~ribufable~ to::tfie-~':1ob: as::outlmed.,:below: =~~Fey • _ . . - ~-p ~ ~ ~ -chary~' (~ed foe:SPECI'AL~SERl~ICES-shall~be-in:add' ion~to ttie $A~SIC,~FEE:,` ' ~ ~gt. ~ ' • . . _ f i' •2 •7, i. t• ' ..,t~~ ~ - ~ . j.: .c~ .~'~:•..rzi. ' ' . 't~ - •Z ~ - ,'t,'~ .i , .~r . _ . . . . ~ r ~ ` l . - . . _ , r . . ^ ' . . • . _ , ~ , • : • „ . , . , . - 6_ - 'FEES`FQR 'BASIC-SERViCES - . _ . - ' . . . _ ' " 'y` ~ sl ' - ' - , • • ~ ' y'' , ' : ' ' ' . _ . ' ~ , • ' .l' ~ . ' ~ :4• ' . . ' • ~ _ f - ' ^ _ • ' • • ' . • • ,~r . '.9.. ' ~ ' ' .F.r` ~ : . - ~ • -Tfiie ~ENQI[~EER:wiH,present.~the -CLItNT, wittian " .iterriiied 'rn'voice`..~acti~riaonth'~fo~::BASIC: -ERVICES etfiorm' `d -ttie' :S- . P e . - previ~us'~mon;th;~~~:TFie;.amou~t~of.~the BASIC:~S~RVIC~ES .FEE•~cti'arged;eacti-~,onth :shall-ti,e;.based;ori:6mount:~of~.fim r t.. • . . • ~S.tm, ^t-'1- • • - . .-pnd°expenses•experided'-eacti: rriontbut;the:-aggregate:o#~~aII:;BAS~C~tSERVICES~ FFES ~charged`or,.monthly ~invoices~ - ~ ~ ,stiafC*not;exceed the •#otal BASIC`SERVI*GE&FEE;authbrized. her`ein: ~ ' ' ; . - _ .~.5 - . ~ _ ~ . , • . r . - . . - ,~ti;_ . ~ j`4~l~' S.f'; _ . , ,''x•d • . . • : > . ~ ' '~r. tii~-. . . . . _ . ' . • ''f:-• ' : i . :t. , • - " ti _ • . • • ~ . ' ,S . 't i•- , . " - , - . ~ ~ . . , ' ' • _ , - l"i' ~ ~ - ' . . . • t. ' . ':Z: .'FEES`FOFt-SPECIAL,SERVICES' - ' -y~ • - - . - ~ ~ • _ . . - ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ . ~ - ~ ~ . ~ . . - _ . . . • . ~ ~ . . . . . : ~ • • : - : . . . ~ - - . - - - _ . . _ • _ . . . :R '<< , ~ ''j' ~ • • . ' _4 _ . . • • , : ' When..ttie.~servic'es~ ~ovided bY the'ENGIN~EtR'6re=not included:i ~ =tt~e 'BASIC-~SEfl V.IEES-descri~ tionof~~v+iork~ , tfien'the`:.~.~• " . . P . . . : : . . , . x. . q. . . . p._ ll ~ be= bilfed-:fo the- CLrENT' asPECIAL'!SERICES~'based the:'amount'of 'time -and; ~expenses.expend'ed'eacti . ~ . . ~ . • _ _ - - - - ~ -m.onth. `to~~perforin.•the SPECIAL :SERVICES; _ ~ _ • -.ti . • ~ . . ~ . - - ~ - - . ~ _ : . . " - . • . . ~ . • . " • . . , • , " ' ' - - ' ' : - . _ - - ' ~R- . - ' t . _ , . . :i _ , ' . , _ . . ' . • • . . ~ " . • . .4 r~. y 8. :=COMPUTATfON.OF<TIME=AND EX XPENSE: . . . . . . _ . - . - ~ • . - . ~ - t . ' • . , i- , r • . " ` ' _ _ ' .c:_ . ^ . ' . . ' f • : ,.i 'c. 's • ' _ i , - " ' ~ 't To`compute tfie.:TIME."portion -of,the~fee;;-t~ie.:total•~number. of hours.'required•.by:-each-;:employee~ to. accomplish:t~ie~ ~required~work~sliall,bemultiplied:by each_emplpyee's~job-_claissifcation hourly:.billing~'~ate:-.~The~FiourlybiUing~:rate shalF ~ : : " , • ~include ~tkie' cost of wages;- payroll,.taxes; •_Personaf', proPOrty-- tazes;' ~ernptoy~e ~ tienefits,: offce~ ~ent; ~telephone ~ ckiarges;: r. routrne postage~expenses, cfieck prints'and*_document size copies:usedjnternally to.produce tfie_work,-depreciation~,of._* equipm~nt, ~rrmiscellaneous o~fice_anddrafting.supplies,.,computers,'-plotters,~survey"e~quipr-rierif, software,. administratiVe .overhead;- and:profit.~ ~ ~ - ~ . ~ ~ : - , : - , : - ~ _ ~ - . ' . : . : . . . . , . - . _ . . F~ - ~e• ~ . ~ . The, maximum~ hourFy.- billirig rates'by:job•classifratiotv'are as follows:: , - ~ • • , - , ~ . ~ . . : , - - ~ ' . . , ~ • - ' . v~ ~ . • ' ' ~ - . ' . ' - • . , - ~ , . _ , ' . • • - . . - - - - . , i~ . . . : _ • ' . f ; ~ : . ~ , ~ ~ . , - . Job Clasfcation~ 'Nou~Iv"~Billinq=Rate - • • • ~ ~ ~ . Jo'b :Classifcation-:; Hou~rlv:Billina- Rate:. « , . - ~4. • - ' - ~ i ~ . • . • ~ - Y. r ~ ' , ' • ' I' . _ . ` ' ~ ' ~ ' . ~ . ~ . Principals - . - _ • _ . : $130*.00- 2=Man -S~nvey'.CFew Associatelanner.~• 100',001', Equiprnent-(in~•~additio,n to crew) 90:00: Senior Project- Manager' :00'..' Regiafered L."arid~ '85.00 - ,~-Project~Managec~ ..'85.00,.':. ~60;00.~.~: ~ • - . ~ ArchibEn~9 ~ r/LandsdaP' ~e:Archit. ~.80:00.~~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : _C~erical-" ~ ~ - . . . . ` _ ~ c: . . ~ ' . ~•Y - .~35-0d.~. y . . - . . . - ~ . ; , • . . ; _ ~f . . _ , . - . . TFte'EXPENSE:portion'of the:fee yicill',be*~.for,but•,of_pockef-EXPEiVSES directl.,°,ctiargeable:#o:ttie,project, Ezarr~ples;of` . ~3.. ' ~A! . • . ~ ' . EXPENSES; :which will be chatged -in addition ~to _chaeges~-f,.p(, time~aFe as follows: ~ - , ~ ~ • =r~~ - _ - ~ . . ~ _ ' ' ' . t,- • ~t. ~ ' i .i~ , . . • "t • ' • . . ~ . ' - . . - . . ' . ' r ' ~ ' ' 't. _ . ~ . ' • Y. , ' ,.I . . . . i' • . . . . . . 1 C' , • : t~ • ; - • - ~ .~Pnnrts'or-:dbcument size':copies'::~ rodueedfor~the;use::of .,C~LIEN..T::or:his~ageofs :wi.ll:arged'~at:-the`.followii~g~: . . rafes: ~Blueline, Prints_ ~24X36 = $4.40IsMeet~-:Se i~a:2nd ~.On~ inals~: ~24X~6 ~ sfieef~; D'acent_ ~Size !,co~ . - . ~ . P . . 9 - ~ . a ,rPY.. : (8:5X 1:1: ~oF 8:15X14).= - $ 0,15/s he et: . ;e` - . . , . .e. . • , `,`A- :r~ I 'r'• ' , ` ~ - - - - < - -:Travel~-retated~~to the ro'ect:wilL ~ ; ; . - ~ _ ~ . - . - . _ ~ ~ . - : . ' . - P 1~ , be,ctiarged:at:$0340pe~-1ni1e:: . } ~ ~ ;:'~;s•-~: -~•..i~' ~ _ C: ~=Pec dier~t EX.PE~ySES-fo~.tr.avel;~lodging_or~itieafs~for:CLC~Associatesnc: employ'~eswhen'presence_of:employee~ '~.is:~~quired~outside the:met~opolitan~Spok~ane~aiea wilE'be cfiaFged at cost.~lu's=~1~0°!0: . DMaterials~purehas~d,~equipment.rented~an~dfor,fees~~paid~on`beiialfw~l~be- ciia'rged•at'cos#zpli~s_1~0%:._z,:..~ o.: pfus:..~ Subcontractor~/consultants~-Paid. by.CLC=Associates,~ tne:: on~_be~~alf~ of tlie ~CUE{~T.~wilf:be'charged~at°cs~ . . . . - - - - • . . . ~ . . ~ 1 ' ~ , - : - . . ~ ' • i.• ' ~ , • t • • ' • y ! ' ~ : • , • . . . - ~ - . • ' • • t • • . . ' - . ~ . • • • ^ , . ,:1' 9 . _ ~M~~ . • ~ • ' _ . .f,, •y^~ • . - " . , • . . „ • ' . ~ 1. • . . . ' . . ~ ' . _ ~ ~ ' - t•- • ' • ~ • . ' :•v~• . ~ - .t•^'• . . . , . . . . _ ' ' ' . . . ' 'L. _ - . 'iG . . . , ~ . ' . . ~ ' , . ~ ~ , ' . ~ . • ~ • • ~ , • ST~ WORK• AU7HOR1ZATiON : ` ' ~ . . _ _ -°~s,~: . ~ ~ - - . ' - -i• . . . . - - . , t . • - - < _ - - . . • • AGE.20F!S-~~ - ' ~ _ - . „ . . ~ - • - _ . . ~ - _ . . , . . . . , . . • . , w - - ~ • - . . ' ~ s.• - ~ ' ~ R~V'. U9/01.: . • • • • - . ; _ ~ ~ . . . • . I ' ' • . . ' . ' ~'t . . • • ~ _ _ . ; •t,• . ; • ' ~'J • 3 . 1~ . . . , , • ~ . . , . . . ' - . . . r ` , ' . - ' • _ ' ' • . . . .f • ' . • ' . ' • . - , • i • . . - ' ' , ' ' - .i • ' - • ` ' . ~ ~ . ' ' ~ • " ' . . ~ ' ' . . . - ' . _ ' . r ~ . ' ti ~ ~ ~ . ,f~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ♦~'J~ ~ ~ NND FORNtAT _ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ . . ~ . . : . ~ - , ~MONTHL'Y-BILLWG PROCEDUr t • , ~ . _ • . ~ . ~ - _ - - , . - : • • . . . . • ~ - - _ ~ . . : - i_ _ - , . - • ' , 'L - ~ - _ Th6 --~ENGINE~R~ will 'Present~:th~:~CLItN.f ~ with~.ari -~invoice :each=morith~ ,with~~ BASI*C-"FEES 'iYeiaiized~ :~separately frorri'. , . ~:5~?~CIAL.~SERVICES •FEESEXPE'NSES:,~-, Ct~i~a"~eslbecategory.;of'work~ .per#ormed` by-~ali ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ ~ - ~ • . ~ -..emPloyees coliectively„b~t;ini.ill::NO=f`tie~~iterriized~;shoviring. each.erinpCoyee's,ti'rllm-g=rate and-~nuriber o~.l~oufs wo~kecon~ . ~ ~ . . . e" ~ro'ect. ~Infor.~ation~.detailing.~.erriployeeti~tiilling:,rates_:and'the `ezacq'nurribe"r- of p a~ tiour.s,wor"ked_ ~on~~the;~ CL•I~NT'S~. ~ ~ - ~ ~f' ~e t wi-made'avaiia6l~~ fiarges.,f6r''-EXPEI~S~S-will, eb.`itemized,monthly each-. - ~ , ll -be •Ir'.a~/~d .~,n I t. . ' - . . ' t' .il~~'"P-.' ~ ~~'Y • ~ • ~r^ ay' ~7~.~~. ' .t - - . . : ' „ . • ` yQlVG. , - ' - - - ~ - . . - . - < ' ~ • ~i `Y 'i' ~e ` , . ~ ~ +,~~.rl: ' ' •-7 , ,Y• ' . ' • ~i .T• ^jL' ~ti i_r: ~ ~t. _'r. ~ . . ~ - ~'r~~ . ~ ~ ~ ti.. ♦4 ~ . . • 1 J l.'"4!. _ : i. _ • . 'i.. %Z . ~ f •y_. .f♦ ~ ?P~ - ~I~nterest _ . -Month~~~/~ invoices~are^due~and;(~a~ /'ab~~-;u/~'~( ~~nr;esentation.:and;~te past;~iue~3Q=,days:-fio,llowing:the, inv,oic6~~date., . . . 'i~ , J . t'."• : • ; t ` . . .a - i - ~ . . . . : , , . . : : • . ~4ie_rate~ oY 1'~%pei~ rrionth~ will b.~'etiai cg~ ~ed°ori;all;past due~,acco.unts~ivitM "interest~.being:calcula~ed,=from=the°:inyoice. ' . • .4:•...• i • . . , s;:• •i. • - - . . Inferest= wilL~ be:=~ompou,nd~d'Jmo~thly; ~ Ttie:~-CLI=~C~NT ~ agree~.-to':pay~.:at1=~'rdaso~le •-attb~ney:s;fe:es; and/or~. ~t~ - - • . , . . . - , , . . - . . . . . =~UtRY~~:BE~,SUSPDE~-ONL,ANY~;PROJECT'-THAT" ~ ~olle'ction-cosfs* incu~r.ed~,t~::coilect-°:past:di~Lamounts, EN t , t - - . . . . - . _ . . - ~ . . '"sBECOMEt-'60~-DAYS~PAS~~D_U~E,-I:,WORK~.1f1iIt~L _~iD-.T..; :RESUl1~E1-UNTaL~~T~iE:ACCOUNT~~IS,:.~?AID,~TO~~a;C.UI~REI~T~_ . . , _ - ; : - • • _ . . - - • • - ' ~ , . . ~ .~r ~ ~ `~=`•A i;' • ~ `1' •r~ • " ' r~, ' : ~ . ~ ' ~ ' ' ,t _ .ri 3.'t. . . " . ~ ' " STATl:ls:- - - • _ - _ , - • '~1: _ - ~ `'s" _ ` ~•~..i. ~ . . . . , ~r,`,_ ' r ti~~ . _ ~ . • . . . . ~ ~ • ~y' A . : .t~'~ ' , ~ ~ , 1 ~ . . •'S _ ~l _ •.1~ 1 ~ _ t• \ an~~;irivoice:sen#-b ~q ;~he;ENGfNEER~to.t~he,CLtENT•pu~'s~ta'raf~•to`tl~is;project,~the:' - - v.. . . . _ . : - . . . . ~ . . . . - ~ . - ~ . 'CLI~.Ni'= shall. give written.notic=e~~for:~a~y:claiti~ed:.de.ficie~cies;.~~def6c[s; ~o~=da;ck~~of:pei-forr~ance;w4t;r,espectr:fo,,seruices--.. , , . . . . . . t: . . - . - - • ' - - - 1: " ~ ' ' ' ~s~tated:~ . , :coVered, 'by.~said~'.invoice;.'.otberi+iise;~~;;saici:;.services~:s~hall~~be~,due,accorc~nq_td:yits~~.terr~,s •.as.,.~an',acc~unt. _ : . . . _ . . . . . : , . .1; . . . . . . . ~ ...L. ~ ' - ~ ; . . urposeo#~this .,provision-is..to:providz=a.~meaiis:of*'ptompt'~notice,~so~-t~iat`~tFie~E~VGIN-no~:t~e pre~udiced"and~c~n, P-;-. ,Gt~ ' iJ •Y _ `t .L ..1. . J1• ~f.!•i.~' . " aexpedifiou$ly ta:Ees~olue"~n~r ~fai~d:itefects;~defciencies~;,o~,lgckcQf=perfotmance;; . _ °'j~= . . . . . . - . . . . , ~ ~ - ' - ' i.~: = • - i~..'~ '=;s~'. - = = :'C - . ~ . • ' . ~ _ • - - . tj'`• . . _ . . . . _ . . • . ! . ' ' ' L'r. • • r. ~ . : ,,z"'' - ' ~ ` - . n . ` . - : . _10: 'AUTHORITY • . " ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~S . ~r ..i ~ ' r' . .4. . t~ . _ . ' ` ' . . f'y i._ .t . .~r. ~r J`~•' 'l ' :y~.~ ~ , ' , ~ i . - . . _ . ' ' ~~~~t ' .1' ~l' •t • " ~fs -Al:~ACHAJIEt~1TS~~o~;AMENQMENTS,,the': . : _.lii=ttie'case,of.=cdn#licts--b~tween~~tio-1'l~lbR-kC:AUTHOR-I? ATIO~I for_r'r:tFan . revail-with'fhe,kii9 ~~ti0r:docuftient^taking;p{ecec~ence~~ove~ doctiri~ent-listed~U'iiderneatk~. -~folldwin9 ord'er'sFiallP - - - - • , t. - . . . . ~ , ~ ' • ~ - ' ' • " : :'t.' ~ .f''~• .n ~ . ~Y~., ' ' . ~ , ' ' ' , . . - - ' • . . . • i , . . • _ c.:~ . - , _ ~ ~ - , . _ . • , • - . . ~ . :~A. ~AMENDMENT'~o~ttie:VVORK.-AUTH~ORaZi4TIOfV~ ` ~ . , ' • . ~ - ~ . - . ~ . . ~ - . . : . . ` ' _ : . . . ; _ • ~ ~ " - 'i' ~ cti. erit°B" CI . , . ~ ~ . , . . . ~B. SPEAL 'PRO~VISIONS to:the~AWO~tI<-AUTHORIZATION tt ~n _ :)U1/ORK~(AttacFiment-~l~n)',.~~ ~.C. QETAILED.DESCRIPTf,ON ~OF; D: :Executed WORK-AUTHQjRIZATtON-#orm . . : - _ . ~ . ' . : . F : , ; - , . , . . . . . ~ - - 1_ 1=6ENERAL-PERFORMANCEPROVtS10NS~~ ~ ~ - ~ - ` - - . - . ~ . ' • • _ . , - . . • ' . • t. ` • , . ti , _ . , ' ' . • ~ b - STl-NORTHWEST;-here.in..referred -to=as;E~1GIN€ER; ag~ees~tv~Rerform, professional.services ~as•d~sc~ibetf. in this~~~ WORK AUTH~REZATION:~including~~.applicable-.at~actiments:~for~,tC~e:CLIENT;~`-and.the.-CLIENi'; lgrees,_`to employ:-_ - and co,mpensate the ~EN~.IRlEER in accordan -ce.:wifh~ the~~~erms- of:the~V110RK;AUTHO,RIZArtI*N. : : " : - • . _ . . ~ ^ . - . . ' ~ . ' , ~ ~ ` • ` . • • . ' . .y• ' • ' . - , i , - . . _ • - . . ~ . _ ~ - `e~'of ~the-`E~iV~ 1NEER'S'~ ~ . . ~During the'perfo~marace •of:ser.vices~~covei~ed,tiy; this:tlll`ORK,AUTHQRiZA,T,dON;:'ttie: ~scbp.,, . . . G. - . ~ ~ ~services and.~corimpensation. Ju~tEd:by';F'r;iutu211~r-:agr"eed"upon ~arriendmerits~.-• • , ~ ~ ` ~ ~ the~eon•rnay~tie''ad'_ , ' . . • . . r ;r.i~_i:~ ~ . ' ` ' • . ' '•t "t _ • ~ ' . • ' ~ . ' .t ' . . •r - . ~ .i.~..•'• : , sl.. ' . . ' ' : L ~ t a • ~ - ~ C: This 1l~ORK~A~i1fiHOR12~TiON ~~shatfbe : a~ ovemed b~-the-~Jaws.of~'e. jurisdiction-of;fti0'pYojecfi~foc;~vvhicfi` tfie wodk ~is' . - • - ~ ~ - - - ~ 1 ,u - ~ ~ ~ • • . being perfoRned~-or*wt~e'ri ttiere is~no~ prolect~site, -th~o.the:•jurisdict4on where .the. wbrk'is:;perforrned:~~ , .c_ r~~ . ' •r~•, - ^•:r• , . - - • ~ ' , • - i' • • _ ' ' .F::r~ - • . • ~ ' . . ' . ~ : ' , • ~ : i , • ~ ' . ' 1• ~ - .d. - " c ~i' ORK.AIkTHO#~IZATIOI~~~ex~e~ds~.longe~~ : . ~D. . !f.--throu ti~=nQ~-faul'.t~=of..tlie:ENG~iNE~R~ contemplatei~:tind"eT.~t~~:rV1l thah,: twe ve - monttis-,-liFOml*ttie,: `date~' ~o;f =execu#ior~ ~of -said,: V11~OR~K~~`AUTHORiZATION;.'ttie - . . ~ = . . , . : . , , . . . , . . a ~licable ~.SP.-,~CfAL: ~SE-RVICES. ~billin~~ ~~~ates;'~ andlo~:.ez' se:it`e"ric~,s: may ~beJinrreased,"a$'~mutuatlj~-;agreed-'fa~,.~ . . . pp., . . . , ~ . . - - . . . . . . - - ~ : . . . . , . -each~.year.the WQRK~A~1TMOf.17:ATIONins.:in~e~fec~r~~'s,~:-the;fifsf.~(ear;~,to~.re~ec~:tMe'incre~sed~c';',st~ of~doirig.- , ' , _ ~'i;: ' ' . ' 'i., ~ - _ _t ~ - ~ . ~~usirres"s ~and/or-cFian.9ed~~conditions.~ :..b . . - - ' i~ . . ~ _ ; ' • . . . ' _ . _ „s_;.''~::.::.•.,.E • _ - _ . _ ' 4' ' , ' ' . . • • . ' ' " . . - w.7' ~ :j. - n~~, r,~' , . . r ~ }1 . t L•t(e~. - ~'wn~noice-~ - . 'E.'-, This' WOR~FC~~~AI~TN~ORfZATIN' ay: t~e=tet'miriated-'b~:..~'tF~ - . V: ir~3 _ . - . seven: da ~ s ~ in: ~dvance:~.of ttie:=~erminatior''date; ~b 'r~utu~l: j~gnt;s~~"oci~l:~failur.e.:.to . , y , . ~ Y . . , . . . . . : , ~ ~Al~ T}I ORIZR~ION`-by'~'the;.other pacEy,~tkirou~h`:na~'f~ult~of;.fhe ~ . ~accordance:witki~ ttie:fe.rms:~of:,the :ValOR ~ ~ ;perfrminoi~n atin in .a~ ~~lf=~or:°an* 'reason:this'VIIORK-QUTf~Of2'7J~T10iV°is~•teri:~inat~,d;~ttie~;~1VGlN~E~~R:~ha11-~tie ~ aid~ for.~ ~ . . - e 9'P~Y..~ J - . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . :ti . :P : . n,' . . .~tie,~extent'ofrse'rvices:'peCformed-by,.tiim'to.ttie'.temiiiiation;date'in:ctuci'iti'g~.reim#iu~;satilel:ezpens~s=ttiei~;~ue`:,:-` . . . - , . y - ~ : . : ~ . . . : . . . . . . .i,~',=• ~ . _ . r . . . 7~. ' ~ . ' . . . . .•~6 ,a • - • ~ 4 . t . 1~•, _ . 1•. t' J j' ' . . . ~ - . . . ' •1: ' . , ' - ~/S • ' • - S. `It - - - i'a ~ -~enecal-"`ro Foduced..in;. ursi~~t .of=~tM,e . . ..:The~.drawing-originals,:=electronic'~f{e~;:-specifcafiotis;:repoits;_ ~{g .p 1. s,p _ P ' ~ - ~ .~/O rk_ contemDlat~d_~und6r`=this<WORK.`AUTHC~RI~4~J~` f.siialf'.iem2in'~in~`ttte=y~~7~o:pe- ~ofi;-theF;E1~~tN~~R:~r . ' ' . . . . i~ < ' . . _ „ . . ny ~ I"" . y . ' • ' . . . ' ` ; . • : x ' ~ • ' C ..~;CLIENT -sfiall =~be-~~erititlect~#o sei!- of~Ya roves; =spe~i~ica~ion~ ~~-iepo~ts; ,.=to,. ~ his t ~ p~~ , . . • ~ . ~ . - • _ )~~\'Y K 5 . . . ~ ,l[v'a articular.~V~IORK.At~~h~ORIZA.TlOas,p'art.of-:thd-BA51CK, ~F~~~:'~T-he~-CLIEIV~:sfi~aH~be-entitled;to add~tio~nal~ciipies:~ . -P- g.~it~als:,of:drawin.9R~ ~s,-~s~ ~eci~Cations;~-reports~anc~-pr`o~ecf~~fles~~fo~~ttie;c~ost;of,ha~diing~~an~;~~~~ and/.or second~~ori • . • , . . . . . • , • . , i` • • ~ 'i;- - . ^i .d:'s._` . , _ . . . . . . . . . i'f, . - 't . r'` p' . ' • ' i: $TI~-WORK,:AU.TWOi~OZATIbN: ` - " - - ' v: • - ' ~ . _ . fi 5': .:R,:~. . _ ~ :-f. . . ~ • :3,' ' , _ • . . . . ~ ' . . . . - . • . • ' _ . . . . . . - PAUE 3.0 ..'r , • . . ' . . ~ ,'~1.~' '4, r. •4 - ~ V.•~7/01 • • • • . ' ' ' . . ` ~ . . ~ t - . . .a.-- • - • . " t " _ , .`i, • . . r'' . - . ~ • . . : ' ~ , ~ _ ' ~ 3 ~ . . " . .f~ . •I ' . . _ " . . •d ' " ' ' ~Y . . I ~ ' ' ' ' . _ ' . + I . ' - ' " . - , , . . . . " 2~ • ' " .i ' , %'1. . ' . ' . ~ . _ E • • • ~ . ' • ' - ' - • - • . ' ~ . • ~ . ~ ~i: ' . - ' ' _ . ~ ~ . ' . . . ' reproductio4 of. said :docurr ~`s rovided. that- the -CLIENT in= cor~ , ~p „ q=.`nFnce-'with-ottier-t.etms-~of ~the' ~WORK ' - • - - - - - ~ ~AUTHdRIZATION*. •'The~cos. , reproductiQn of said additional.~d'ocum~r►:'': ,in..addition:to-the.=BAS1~'~FEE-.'' . .'~EIeetro ,n"ic.files~c,reated by the. EN-GINEER in~ the production of•tli.e CUENT`S. .Work.contains proprietary~ari~ormation~ whic Fr:is tFie sole ~property - of -the 'ENGINEER.'-.'Electronic fles shall :bel~tlie~-sol e properiy of .the: ENGiNEE R~ and will,~~ ~ . : . . . . . : . , . . : ; `be~:rele.ased~to'tFie=C;LIENT:or-the-.CLIENT'S agent:solely'at-the discretion ofthe.`.ENGINEER:' . . ; _ ~ • . . ~ ~ ~ ~ r.~~ ~ • • ~ • ~ ~ . ~r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ♦ ~ . . ~1 ~en~'that ttie~CL1ENT -provide.s-;er~oneous ~infoFrriation.~to~the ~EPiGINEE~R; -or ~revises information;:pr,eyiou's'.ty. •r.~~ rovided;' creating 'a situation =wFiere..~ttie_ ENGINEER fias -~performed-' work~~ th~af mustbe cot-"r.ected by.-- the': . l E~N(~INE~~t',~ ttien=.alLsuch~ work~.will abe -billed to~the CLIENT_as.-a-~SPECIAL;-SERVICE: ' It is. furtFier~~understood:th~ai~ ~the=CL~E-~1T;shall hold-the- ENGINEER" ~iARMLESS .frorii* all liabilitie~,~•which~h,.ia,y ~acccye`to: the-~E~1G'IN~ siilt~ of .sai . . , . - : . . - . _ E~ER~~as':a::~ _ ~ . d eiToneous or_revised:in,formati on ' s ' ' ~ . ~ • 's~. . . , ~ . . . . . • , ' . , ' . _ ' ~ ! ~ ~ ' . . . . . ' ' • _ ' ' . ' ' ` • ' . . . ~ , . - ~ ~ . - ' _ , ...'i" • .}2 , ~ • . . . -ENGIIVEER.RESPC'SId_SIBIL-ITIES: ~ . . . . „ . , . . . . . . . . - r:- - ~ ~ = . . . . _ . - . - W l ~ i . . _ ~ ~ . . j • < ' _ • - . ~ J ~ • ~ • . , . . . . . 'A: ~Tt~eE[V'GINEER-will:.~act~as the-CLIENT'S-.agent with* respect.to,those-'pha`ses of~tlie`project ta;vuh'rch.this,'VVO;RK ~AUfiHORIZAT(ON~~ aPPlies:' . f, . _ f : - • • ~ - _ • ' • . . . . . . _ . . : = - ' _ - i, • . - , • _ ~ , ti _ ~ , - . . co- • _ ~ , r• ~ . . n' • • , . . ' y`~. . . . . " , ' ' - . . '!~i _ 1 - . ~ • . . - y. . . . ~The~.~NGIt~EER"will,perfiorm=Fiis~work'in'a:timel ~'manne~r,~but-it~is~~a ~eett;,u~~on~,between.the=~ a~ties'to~th"is'1IV0~ ~K~- . . ~ - . . . - , 9, . . P... . . , . P . . . . ~C 'At1THORI~ATION fthat~thENGINEER .is.not'~responsible ':~b ~ for•.deaays aused -y_~actor.s'sbeyond~=k~is ~ - °cont:r,ol or•'y- ' . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ fac;~ors~=whicta~ could,not:reasonably- have been.'foteseer~ af the'tirrie~ this=VllOf~K~AUTHORIZATION~-was execu ~ . . , : . , . . . . . . . . . . . t~e ~It-is'agreed~that-utimely riianner"~sfiall mean~ai time'frame roughly.equal:.to;that~.take-n.'by-otFier'engineers=on, sirtmilar:=~~ :.projects-under similarrconditions, ,requiring'similat approvals.from~ similar agencies:.::- - • - . . _ . . - - • , • : - . . • ~ ~ •e , . • . - C:' The-.tNGrNEER "~viiilt,-perform 'his '-work~:in ~~accordance~~with: 9eneraNY' acceP~~ted~ P~rofesgional~ racticre ~~nd~~in~~` . . " ~ . . ~ , ~ _ P - ~ - . ~ . : . ~ ~-accordance~witti.available.published.standards~of.~approving^ageiicies-~an.d,makes-no otherWarranty: . . , . , ~ : ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ - . , . . . - . : , ~ . . . 'D: _:It ~'is: undersfood~.tFiat'the: ~1VGINFER, shall be- resPonsibfe-~for services'.prov'rded ~by.personnel,~in -his-:di~ect: em fo~ . . : P . Y':~ ~ _:-and that~#he.ENGINEEP:does-nt guarantee the` peor.mance of-any:Qttier~~contractor;associated~,wi#h.-this~pTOject:'~. - ~ . , . . . . ~'It••is~ understood that"the *ENGINEER is not,responsible..for directing=_th'e"CLIEtVT'87c~,ntractor *.or"~for 'schediiliiig. . • ~ _ con-str.uction`activities. • • ' • ~ r • ' ' ' • . , ~ . ~ • . - • ' ~ ' ~ ~ ; • • ~ ~ • - i - ~ •J f, ' ~F.. ~ It;is•,un~derstood that:the' ENGINEER•.shall not be respo.nsible.to=coordinate with=utility:.companies~for..the,.design:.. •~and~_installatioriof~electrical .se~vice; telePhone`service, cable N -seristreet- lighting*•or other.,utilities•w~iicn_ tne~ : ~•CLIENT-may-require. N= - . . . . • ' . - • . . • • , . ` ' • - • - • ~ ~ ~ , ~ ' . .~T - . . . , .13. :.CLIENT RESPONSIBILITIES'. :~J ~ ~ " ~ . . ~ . . . . . , - _ ` : . . . , ~ , : ~ • _ . The: CLI~ENT :will *provide all criteria and~ full informatiob ~as -t4~~his requirements'for~ •tlie 'project:- - The~. C~:IENT will ~ ~ , • , • - -:assist Ahe. _ENGINEER~by :placing'.~at his disposal ~ all=;available, -writte,n 'data: pertinent •:to~~"the site: of'"the project;'-~ . 'inclucl"ing~previous:reports, correspondence with:putilic or p~ivate. ager~cies:ot~individuals,~-topographic--maPs'of-the.--.:-- - :oject area, pertinent boundary -surveys.: and. right-of=way.surveys,.; soils'repoits;:~".pcotectivp, cbvenarits,` andany ~ . . . . . . , . - . . . . . . ~ r , . .:othermater.ial:of a;technical nafure-pe'rtirient-to`the Rrojecfsite*wtiicli may-i-equired. ~ ~ ~ 3: , , ~ ' . ~ - ~ . ~ • . - ~ . _ . - . - - . . - . - . ~ ~ , ~ . . . . . i_, ..~,r~ • ' . . • . . `The~':CLIENT: .:will ` ezamine- all'. studies;=~ repotts,. ~sketcfies, .specifications;,.=..drawings,,~;;agreements.and.=:ottier.==-. . : . _;docufnen'ts..presented. by• fhe.'E~~iGINEE-R, - to~.the -CLIENT.-;,The~-.CL-;IENT-will_.give,prompt-,vuritten-~notjce:,to~•the: , _ • ~ ::EN.GIN~Ewtienever he- observes .or :otherwfse becornes -aware=.of :defeets.pe.r•taining-~to`th 'S e,ENGINE~R .work~~'.~ , . - He<:pr_ojecC~'. - . - . , . . _ - . ~ . _ : . . . . - . - . . , . ~ . . : . . . ; _ . . • , ~ ` • . . • ' . . ' ' . . ' , - : ~ S• ' • ! ~ ~ ' - - • ~ . . . , . ' • t • . ' . i• • t . _ . ' . • . ~ . 1 Within 3Q~days'.af~er:tti.e~invoice~date,of-any invoice~sent by~ttie:ENGII~EER'toAthe, CLIENT-pursi~arit to•.#his.WORK:' - , • • . „ ~ • ~r• • • ~ . ,1. ~ - - , . . . - , . ~ • . ' - - - . : :=AU1'~kiORIZAT[.ON~the: CL:IENT sFiall give wen_nqtice tv the=~ENG~NEE~R:o~-any.ctai~:ned+~deficiencies~ lack.of: perforinance with.~respect to seryices cove~ed. by- said: invoice,;;Qttietwise;.,payment__fot 'said~:Services.=shall ~be Aue~'-a~cco.rding4:to~the-te~ms.of.the.-V110~RK~~UTHORIZATiON. The~-puFpose.'of=tliese:pros~~are~•~to~ pGOVide°a-..~~,,,~ ~ :means of ~prorii potic~ fb~,the ~ENGINEER ~so ~tfiat,he:.will .not,be prejudiced.and: can.act ~expeditiously;:to ~fesolve`"=' ~ ~any,=claimed defectsAefrctencies; or lack of performance:~ - CLIEOT.wil( --,designate~ in writing a--person..to,.act. as; his. rresentatiVe:-with-;,respect~-_~o::the-.ENGIi~EER'~S::, r ~ . - -seniices:,tQ~be.performed--under, ttiis=:1NO,RK:;A4JTH0RIZATl6k' -Sucfi:.person~ . . , . ~ . ~ ~ ~ instrUGtions;~r-eceive inforr;xiation'for.tfi~e CL' IENT;.receive- and--review-the.I ENGINfEER'S.invoices;.% . and;:intetpt,~t:aric! } . . . • ~ ' . .defi~ie :~fFie" CUENT'.S Rolicies• and ~dens~--v+iith- .respect. to ~ttie':ENGI~NEER''S.'services;.covered by'r`t,t~is~. WdRK,`-.--- ~ . AUTHORIZATIO,N. . ~ - ~ . - ~ ~ ~ . _ - ~ . , . . : : . . ' . _ ' . . . ~ ~ . . . • - ~ ~ ~ ' - . _ ~ . . • . . _ STt WOR[C AUTHOR14AT10N~ ~ ~ ~ - - . • ~ ' • ~ : ' - . ~i : : . , : . . . - • - . '-r • ~ ' , . " PAGE4•OFS: . . ' . , - • - ' • - . . - _ ' . . _ . ~ . _ . . . , . . ~ ~ ~ , . . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . . - . : ~ . REv.,09101. . • ~ ' • ' • ~ . ' : . . ' • • ~ . . ~ a , , ; _ , . r'~ iw.• .t. :Th~e~•Cl'IE.NT,wilf-be-r~esponsi~,~ rr,iake_pfovisionsfo~-.ttie,ENGWEERS'~ ~1.acces$~-~o~private*:lands as..m'ay,be-.~ :required~to perform~,requii-ed s`:.~ce~~under this~WO~RK~AUTHORIZATION~.-. : - " ' - - - ~ ' ' • . . - . . ' . ' , : ' ~ ' , . ' • ~ ~ . j. - _ . , ~ . ' _ . 'E._-The~.CLIENT- will-be~responsible• fo~-the-preRaration ~and/or-:legal. review,af;any contracts~-or, ,ot~~e~•legaa♦docur.rients • -whieti rraay~be=:~equired.,in,pursuit ofwork conteri~plated tiy ttiis.WORK AU~HOR17~T10N:=='.- • - , . ` ~ . c , _ . . : . ' - ~ - ' • ::N- ' ~ ' ~ - - , .s',. - : t' - . . , • . _ - - •`F: ~ :-The`.GLIENT=.itiillr~advise_:his>contractor. of~ tlie-co~itractor's~'res1?'onsibili -ta~ rofect-at)?:~u~rve.'~~s#akes;~nonum~nts~ . . . - tY P. . . r Y. r . . . . poin`ts.-" The ~CLIENT'or ~his,'contractor shal1 tie respon'sible~ to~.notify~t~ie;:ENGtt~IE~R:ttiree ` - • ~workin~-=:.da s'-iri~addance ~of=the::Ee uRement-,fofit~tie~:~ lacemen~ ~of~~coiistr.uctiori'~stakes;~as=~.uilt~~fsunie°-s:~andlor~: . . _ r . . ~.9 . . q_ -:P. _ .Y. r in~pections: ~1IV~i~le=~.i~:: is• undeFStood ~ by~~th~ ~ ~NGI~iE~R`-ar~d-~:the .CLIENT:~that-,-situations-;~may:, a~ise,-~where-, fF,i~ee . - ' 4 . . r . • ' ~ ~ ,.t . ~'.wa,i~k'in9 ~ 'd'aX~advai~;ce:notice'-maY' 'riot- be:PracUc~l;-~the:noti~e~p~n.~is=esta;blishe~~to~aid~in~the;deterrr~i,~iativn~;af-_~~ . . :0 . - • - • . - . , :whethdr- byert~me•~c~iar ~,.EN,GIN,EER: 1f..rs further undee~t~ ~ "ir~c ~eo~ er Y . ~ ood' fhaf'_ir'Y~~the~;cases- er :p~r p. . ice 1.is=:~ riot,~. `ractical-~~-the~=7EN6INEER :w.~l- h~ake::~eveN"J :reasonable•:effort;incluc~,ina~ `over=t~me=~:fiou~s= ~to~ ~ - " ~ - ~ .I ~ A _ S~ ✓t ~ . " .'J ~f~r - J DV ~ •1 ~ . .'f•.Y _ • ~ • -'acc~mmoda#e.'the~GLI~~VT'S ~schedule.' . . . . . _ . . . . _ . . _ - _ : . ~ . . . . . , _ _ :y • . . . , - _ ' ' ' ' . ' ' ~L . ' . »i. ` 7 Lf ~i•• .I - ~ - ~LIENT~~wil~~~e~cecute-~o imel ~is~ IappFP. -~~o'~riate`-documents.re~9~uired.P~ur~sua~~#~.;~fo~.the~#utfill~ent~~of.th~~`~+~ :e~ G;. :~Th . --ENGINEER'S=and-:£~LIE~1fi'S ~6s60nsitiilities.'urideF' , - - ' f' - . - - • • _ -2 . , . _ . „ _ • ~ = . ~ ^ _ _ = `e. N forrriation--nr- fe'es~~on~:a~_timel Y .basis, =as~~re~ orma~ion .atid'.fe~~~ H. The. ~CLIE NT wiU; P: ~ov,i4' 6~-fCirthe"r~in - • `~j . . ~ : . • I ~~1. . •~:1.~.. . _ ~maY'include,y:,_tiut:is.~riot:limited. to;*•tFie-followin . . :r~~ . - ~ . '',:.=4 `1 ~ • , ~ ~ . . . 9~ . . • . ~ - . _ , . . • . . _ ~ , . .i-. : . , . •ti.. ' ~ . . ' • - . _ • _ • • . ' ' - ~ ' . •"'~~r - _ • i - .c ,j!- . ' ` ' • f , , " • ' ' ~ . "t'> . , /Y.4 _ ~l ' '~~~1 t ~'Sev3er~T:V:_fees . . ~ - . , Ii ion-.andi ~oc~ essin ~ e ~ ~ . ~ _ . - ~ . - . •'o _ - ~ - :M1. : : cat :pf g es g . . , -APp y• . . - ~ . ' ~ . i . . " ~i . F,~ " `1..•.J 't•.. • .5 :'A ~ ency:~design'rEvievii ~fees, _ ~.4.:- ~Cost~of prmting:arid- mailing documents~and:report s~ _ _ ~ . , - . - ~ . ~~v' ~ ~ . . ~ ,5.--:-4ther.- fees h62'sOecifcall~Y--.discussed*-e1sewhere~in this=WORK AUTHORIZAi~ION.;; ; . _ . . - . . , , . ~ , . . ~ _ -.r . , . =i ~menfiwit r-a ro ~riate' 'fili co~ anies for•fhe~desin~anci~~ ~ _tt shall•be the ;CLIEf~T S resporisibility tp make~•arrange h pp p _ u ty, .mp . . g . . ~ -_instaltation of-utilities;vuhicli_~may:be•~equired -to be instalf_e.d.cortcurrerit with-:stceet,;,storm`d.rainage,, s~wer; viiater.or.= othe~~ facifity,.bein,g,=designed. -andlor- inspected tiy 'the-ENG1~iEER: : Said -utilities`:~maincfude; ,~tiut- ar.6=riof - limited ~ . ~ . _.to,~.electrical:~iower:~service; ~telephone: seniice;•cfible*N service; -or street lightin,g: • ~ • • j • , ~ ' ~ , • ~ „ - • ~ ! j ` . - ~ ' , - • _ , . 4._, ' ' • . . • ~ • • ' , ' . ' ' . ' - _ ~-J.' ~ 'It ~-is.. sRecifically;`undersfood -~~that the CLiENT~ tias' not. ~retained. ~the~ _ENGINEER ' as=: a~ ~con'st~uction., ~rlanager r; •responsbie:for~.dir,e,cting ~ihe C'L-IENT'S' confiactor andlor.`scfieduling construction=activities.=.-The CLIENT~,shall.be - ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ responsible to'•pfovide-his contractoTS:with ~curtent approved ~plaris and, specifications. ~ . , • . . ' . ~ ~ ' . ' . " ~ ' ' • ' .l ' • . • ' , • . _ ' ~ ~,IF'.., . ~ -13: WORKING~MOURS-AND_OVERTIME_ • ~ - ~ ' . . ~ ~ - . ~ . ~ - ` ~ - • ~ _ -~Y~ . : : _ : : ~ ~ . . . ' • ~ _ . . . ' , , y ' • : . ` . "Y. •G," • ' - • • . ~ . . ' '•J . • ' J`' . . ` -;J _ . . . ' . ' • . - . - i~'~ , " ~ - It~-is~understood:~hat'the~~ENGINEER,S'iregular.working houis'fo.r,,a![. -:of Fiis eFnPloYees'~is;•ei9. ~ ht~tio;urs:'per: day;ar~ct-fo _ hours-per week; .less~ p~id. hol'iday~ t~iours vtirhich. rriaybc~ui in-a: paiticu(ar week.~_ ~Regular'woik: day~~~ are .Md~iday:~through~- : Frid~y:- ~Ttie -EN.GIN~ER'S~ e~fablish~ed~.~paid'.'holidays are as: follows: New Yeaes ~bay;Memorial' Day;~~ftSeFQurtFi":of: . . July~.La~or Day.,-Tha~iksgiving~; and. Ctiristmas, . - . : . ~ , . ~ . ' . ~ : . ~ . ' _ . . ~ : ~ . - ~ : q.. ` . • • : • . . ~~`I ' - . _ - ~ . . . . - ~ - - . : ; _ . ~.F' ~ ' . , . ~ ~ -Wh6n' at;ttie` dis~ Cetion: of .:th'e 'ENGINEER the. EN~INEER'S"offce= ide :wort~~ load;-~reac.fies ~a~ level ~where more . . v . ~re ~ular~wo~kin ~`hou`~ ``~re`re"uired~toracc,omlish~tfie~~ivorkon~a~tir~iel~~basisd~wh~en~#he:ELIENT~tia~- ivei~~~ g., g -~,a q.. = p . . Y: , 9 riotice~ofi worK:toKbe,=perfo~med; th.e E~IGINEER.=may' elect--to-.require--his,-empioyees- to~:wo~k- in.excess~:of'the,iegulat,= -7 _ ~ J . : • ' . `Jt~ . . 4 - -r , _ . ~ ~ : : 'v~.ror.kin hours-and:,ch'arge:fortatl work at'ffie,reguJac..wo~ki.rtg:ho'u~:bil l ing,rate. . . . ' • , .y . ' _ ' a . ' _ _ , - . ' : ' . . F . . ` S ~ . . ' ' m ' •t` . i. ~ , • ~ . ' .a - . . ' . . • - . , .Y: . ' ' ~l.f'==ti~oweve'r"=tfie~~CL- fE ~T~~fails~ o~ ~FVe' ro ~er not'ice-of'.~iiork:tobe`' `~for~ried qr:ttie:vole~~e.of':work-to:be eifotrried:~is n~. • ~~r. t_,~g .P_ P. ~ - - . . , , ~`ven~ R;s~ , '-Qie.;. ~IGIPtEE ~ ~s:obuipusl - in,`excess- of.: `N hfit` "cari~'be::per.formed._durin the~ regular'virorking-'tiours-avaiEable~=gi., ~ .•Y~: . - _ .9 . , . . . _ : ~r: . . _ tFie'.EN".GINEEF~ riia~!. . teq. -ui'ceis~.emp(oyees ;to.~work<<it1':exc~ o~ Xh~~~regular-_'wc~'rkiFl`~ ~ no-'Ri~ial .rrianPovVer~-i'eveY~'~then ess . , . ~ ; ti'ours~an~t.~char' e~•f~ie C~I~N-T-fo~ the:exeess~ho~rs~a#-an~~overtime rato~of 1:5 -tirrfes'th'e=regulat;'oillin~q~ ~~~ate : t• . . 9. . . . . . . , : - . ; - :~It:~is-tinderstood:ttiat~,tl~e,ENGINEER'.S- FEE.-~fior•BASIC•.SERVIC~S~~and~fhe~.hour(y,~fates~.fot "S,f~EGl~. AL~S-ERUtCES;As,'`3~Y', betn9 P ~able~.to ~ .erform-~nearlY al~~-wbrk,' ProPosed~ in fi.ill•shifts: of-eigh~f~~Fiours•or:rnor.e:; s~tf~fo~:`rea''sons:be~iond ;the` . . . . . _ ~ , -control~of'fiie,~NGtN_. his employees canno.t-perfArm the.proposed~.work~~~ubstantial _ly=•`i~i:ei.ght~~iour-.:s~.iifts,-then•:ftie - • ~ `E[~GINEER'S',FEE: may be..rene9otiated, to-ailow,for overtimeay.,rates: - . . . . . . . . ~ .fr.. _ . ~ 'r . • ' _ , • . _ . . • - ' • , r . _ ; ~ t+ " - ~ , ` ' S~r~' ~ .,7,:: ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ - . - • • • . _ - . ' . . ; • - . ~c „ : . . .3 ,Y ' . . ' . . . ~4:,1, ' • •,I' ~ .~~'1 - T . ' ' ' s' ' " ~ . . ~t-.. ~ _ • ' . A /.~t '1 . . :I _ , ' 1...• • ~ ' ; . ' - ~ ' . . ' ~ . , ' - . : ' \ ' _ ~ a1 ".4• ' ~ ~v.. ~ . . ' ' • ~ . , . _ . . . x. , . . ' ':i':' ~S• -•f,• • . . • . • ~ `~a ~ • • ' ` . ' . . : I~J ' . . ` ` . ( _ _ , . ' j ' , ~ ~~~~t~ .W,.~w, •.y .t. . . . . . ~ . . , . . ' ' ~ 4."_~. _ ~ . .r , i . . - • . . , - . - • - . . . • ` - . - ~ . . ~ - .r, ~ : i- : ~ . • . . . " . ' - . . . ' ' ~ . '0l•. :r: ~1.. ~ ' ~ . . ~.S~i ~ . 2 ' . . . - • , • ~ ~ _ ' : ' ' . ' ~ 'rv - , . . - . , . : . , , , . . . . ~ d . ~ • ~Y= • STf ~ W9'RICAUTHORIZATI0M• - - . ' _ : • - ~ . . : . • ~.:.s•1~, ~ - . ~ . . _ , . . _ - ' . . - . - . : .ti' `•1 _ - . . : . . , _ • , . , . . . ~ . _ . . ' PA~E 5 QF,S: - . . , - _ . . , - . • ' , • ' ' . „ . , . . ' : . ~ . . , _ _ . • . , ' = ' . ' . ' ` , • . , . : . : : . , - 'R£V." 097,01'.. , ' - . . . . . , . . . , ' ' ~ . _ . . C~ . , •~_yw- _ r.,_.., : . ~ ' . - t ~ • •-ri : i, : ,i: . . _ . . 'ry , H':, . 'J ' • ' . • • • . , ` ' • ~ ' _ • ~ . . . ' H, ~ . . . . . ~ ~ ~ . . • . . . • ' ~ • ~ . , ~ : , . ~ • • ` - • 4 . •i" s~'. • . , . . . ' ' ' , _ ' ~ _ . . ' ' . . . , ~ _ , . ~ ` ' ' - • V. ~ . ` ' ; ' . : ' ' . ' r ' s ` . ~ , . . i,» ' . .t' a . ' _ • . . , . • - - ' • ' . ' t ~ , ` ` . ~ ~ .t _ '.r~ - ~ , • ~ : . , . • ~ . ' " : . , . • ~ ~ ~ • . . . ` ' ` • t'+ ' - . . . , t ' . ' _ ' ' ~ . . J ♦ ~ • ~ 4 : ~ . ~ • • ' d ~ . . + ~ • . ~ . . . . . . . ~ ' / " _ ' . a _ .1' • . • . . , f. 4' " . ~ • ~ • ~ - ~ . , . . ~ • ' • ~ . ~ • ' ~ , • • • t • ~ , ' - . • ` • J " • t • • . . y f " • ' . ~ ' ' , - • . '•l.• . • • ~ • . . ~t,. . ♦ I H I N~:; .3`, f":~. . . ' ` • • ' , ' _ . • ' ~ . ~ • • f - . ` -r'~ _ ''r: , ~ y.i . . , . - , - ' • . ' ' - . , ' _ - r ; ' . t.: , ' !.i - , , •'oi ~ ,'r' ~ . . - . . . . , M1 . . . ; ' , . . ' ' ' . - ' . , ~ .5~ , ~ ' a' . t.. . . : _ ~ , ^ . . _ , . _ ' ' ' J . _ _ • ' . ~ 4r~ ~ : ~ - , - - ~ ' , , ' ' ' ~ ' ' ~j ' ' • ' - . . . . ~r t , ~ :r. ~i ~ -r • " , . , - , . ~ , ` ' . t . ' ` , t f.. , t` ~ ~i:: . F • . . . . ? . • ' ` . • . • ` . . - . I ~ • - , ' ' .'`t~ _ • ' t ` • • ' .'2'! LM . . 'j" f ' • • -Ir+„ •a,3~ ~ •i • ~ ~ ~ , . . y ' _ . . ~ . " . _ . . , L. , ~ ~ , ' . ~ - • _ • ^ l• ' i' • 1Y.• ~ : , , , . , - , . . , . ~ , ' . . . . . . . - : r: , . . ~ ' • ' ` : . t..', . , f" . : - . . . , ' . ' - _ . • . ` ~ ' • " . ' ' ~ , ' - • .,i~ . , • . ? ' ' ' 4 . ~ ` . ' " • ' . . ' • ` " „ a.' , • ' ' . ' . . ' . , . ~ . ~ , . , 'r~. " ~ - , •i- . : . ~ . . ` . - , , , , ,f ♦ : ' ^ : : , r, ` ' . . : , ,K t . _ . ^ • i' ' - , j r ' • a~,,, . , ' ' ~ • _ , ` . R , • 1y•'• • ' , , • ' • ' ` ~ • ~a.~~ , • - , ' ~ . ' ''t•i. q.. . x ~ ' . ' . , M• P~ t : ' ' . . . ~ . - - , . • . +t • : l , ~ • s'•. ~ ,Y ,Y'~.• ^ . . ~ S. . . ' t ~ • , . • . ~ i ~ . • . ` ; , ' _ " ~ ' , . • • ' . = . J, , . ; ~i: , ~ • . ' t . ' .t • , ' • , . ' ~ . . `1 • .1 . . . f' .~F c ' . ' - ' ' • ~ ' " ^ • ' " . ' ' . ' ' , _ _ . ,6, , • . _ . ' ' • - ' . . ~ . , ; J . ♦ , ` . • . ` ~ 5 i • • ' • + , - : • . ' . . • J . , - ~ M , . . • , • , , , . ' a. . , " • % • y • ' ' . - • . • ~ , ~ .I , ~ , * ~ . ' . , . ' 4 . - L - " _ " ~ . , . ` , . ~ ` . . ~ . ' . ~ , . , ` ` t, I ~ . ~ ^ I , , • • • , ~ - - . . • . ; ` , . . ^ ; - r . Yi', - • - • f• , r ' , • • ~ " ~ .i . • • ' . • ~ , • _ - ,y~ , • • ' ' • _ ~ - . J •tt• • ' , ~ ~ • ~ • • ' ~ • ` , ' ' ` • y•• r ~ • • • ' • • . • ~ • • ~ • " _ ' ' • ~ ` ` `y ' • , • ' , • _ • ' • , • ' - ' 1 f. • ~ . . • , • ' • t. , . ~ ~ . • . • • . . • • ' ` ' , f , . . . . ~ - : , ~ ~•'.t, ~ .,'•1 • - . , , ' ~ . ` . _ , . ! • . . . . .4 .'r . , ' •1 . , 1 . . ~ . ` Y • . • : ,4 . ry , . . . . , . I' ' 1. • • r.• . • - . ` : ' l~ • ` ~ , ^ ~ • • • . . V . i , p~ •I -`e' . - • • . • • • • , ~ . ' ' ' , . : •I ' . _ ' ` . ti~,', . Y•., • ~ . . r ~ / ' . ~ . ~ ~ • • • ~ ♦ ~ .1~~~ ' - ' . Y . . . ` ` ~ ~ ' + . . '3 ~ , ^ !y] ~ • . ~ • . ; : . . , :S3 •.'(-.I , " ' . • . , . . ~ , ' ' •t . - . ` 4 ~Y ' ' ' ' ' ' , . A ~ ~ ~ .1 . . ` ^ • • , • . • . 't ~ ' • • • ~ ~ ' ' • ~ : ' . . , ♦ it• . . . . ' L ` - ~ e. J . • ~ rY• V • • . ~ . • y' ,f ' ..~~^;-a~^ ~ , . 5 : • . . , ' ~ , ~c ' . ~ ' . . ` 4 ' • _ .T: ' ' ' . '1. . , • , ~ . L . . . . ' , , . - ' . • . " ` • - ' , • ~ • ~ , , r • • . , . . t ,I , ~ , . . . • • _ .3~ T • , t ' • • • ' , • . ~ . . ' ~ ~ . f, , ' G . ' " ' ~ ' • ` ' , " Q ~ •~r.f ' ~ ' ' " , .\w~ . - ~ ~ = . ~j_ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ ~ . . • . L • • ` . ' i . . - ~ . ' ; S • ~ y' . ` ~ , ♦ " • ' • • - ' ' • • • S•' L t , ' • ~ • . . ' • • • • ~ - ~ • r r , , • ~ ' 1 ' ~ , / • ` I ` • , , ° . t , + . ' 2 ~ ±s . ~ ,4 t ~ ~ • ~ ' ' , . . , . _ t ~ e ' "T ; l- ~ " • ' , f ' . ' r i 't ` • ' • - . • ' , r - •l ' ~ ~ •1 l , ~ . ~ ~ , ' I , , , ' ' y , , , • _ , ' . ~ . ` _ . • ~ ~ -i~ • . . . , ~s. 'y>~ : s r . . , r, • . . : .,4 . - Y . . ' 'i ` ' + • - • - - . . . . , ; . . • . f.: . . ` - , " , : ~ f. • . . : . • , , . . , L• . ' - - • , } : . ~ • , , ' a' : ~ .e _ , - ` ~ . . , , a : ' . • ~ - ' ~ . ; . , ' ' - _ , .t. ' ~ . • . • _ ' , ' • . . ~ . ` " ' • ' . ' . • . i. ~ . ~ . . ' ' ~ . ' , . ' - _ . ~ • - . , . . • . . . ~ . . ' • ' . • • . . ' ' . • . • ~ • . ~ . . ' . . • ' t." . . 1. +~~I ~ . . • .r • • ' •A~. . ' . _ i• y- • M1 I,.••' . .,.1 , ' . . r Y• ' . j; w''l:.. ...`S~- - I • , , . . . . •.~.T • ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ' • ' . ~ . ~ . . . . ^ • ~ ~ ~ ~ , • ' t r, s , , ' • ~ 1 ~ • • ~ • ' ~ ' ~ • ' . , . ' ~ „ " • _ - ' • • ' y . • ' . . . , ~ ' t ' • , ' • ; , f. , _ x • • - - , • - . ~ . t' _ _ . , _ • ~ , . : . . . • s. . . . , - NORTHWEST SOILS, TESTING & INSPECTION September 9, 2002 Proposal No.: P-02078 - Mr. Buster Heitman . Landmark Development 8225 North Division Street Spokane, WA 99208 , Re: Proposal for Construction Inspection Shelley Lake Fourth Addition Spokane County, Washington Dear Mr. Heitman: As requested, we have prepared this proposal to provide construction inspection services for the proposed Shelley Lake Fourth Addition subdivision located in Section 24, T. 25 N., R 44 E., W.M., Spokane County, Washington. This proposal summarizes our estimated scope of work and associated costs. 1: SCOPE OF SERVICES Our proposed scope of work was developed based on review of undated plans prepared by CLC Associates, Inc. The following sections detaif our proposed scope to address each inspection item. We will provide construction observation and material testing services as outlined below. A. Construction Observation Services: 1. Earthwork and subgrade preparation. 2. Placement and compaction of all base material and pavement. 3. Placement and compaction of sewer and water backfill. 4. Verification of side services and marker posts. 5. Curb and sidewalk installation. 6. Drywells, inlets, and general facilities. 7. Temporary drainage facilities. 8. Erosion control. 9. Coordination with Spokane County. 10. Preparation and submittal of street and drainage record drawings, preparation and submittal of sewer record drawings including County mandated U-16 forms. 11. Soil and material testing for compaction and backfill for items 1 through 5. 2214 East Riverside Avenue • Spokane, WA 99202 • Phone (509) 534-9711 • Fax (509) 534-9755 A Division of CLC Assotiates inc. Buster Heitman September 9, 2002 Shelley Lake Fourth Addition Construction Inspection P-02078 STI Northwest Page 2 B. Direct Expense Mileage will be billed at the, established rate at time of billing (currently $0.44 per mile). Actual reproduction costs with a 15 percent markup. 2. DESCRiPTtON OF WORK Construction observation by STI Northwest personnel or other agency personnel shatl not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to construct the facilities covered by this agreement to the line and grade shown on the approved plans or as staked by the engineer. This contract agreement does not include construction management, scheduiing activities, or preparation of irrigation Record Drawings. 1. The scope of these construction engineering services includes: A) Periodic observation and reporting of specific construction activities on this project which include subgrade, bases, pavement, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm drainage, and material testing; B} Maintenance of all construction records related to construction activities outiined in paragraph "A" above, which may include daily inspection reports, manufacturers' certifications, material test reports, and correspondence; C) Assurance that the construction of the roads is according to the approved plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineers, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual; D) Development of post construction record drawings for sewer, water, street and storm drainage facilities; it is understood the facilities inspected by firms other than STI Northwest will be certified by those firms in a form acceptable to Spokane County; E) Coordination of the testing of construction materials for compliance to the plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual. Prior to acceptance of the road and drainage facilities by Spokane County, we will submit a!I construction records and the record drawings to the Spokane County Engineer. Buster Heitman . September 9, 2002 Shelley Lake Fourth Addilion Conswction Inspection P-02078 STI Northwest Page 3 Any re-testing required by inadequate work, requests for inspection when the contractor is not ready or requests for services not specifically stated in this document will be billed separately as a special service. It is your responsibility to arrange for any back-billing to the contractor or material supplier. We will coordinate our inspections through you or your general contractor. Any requests for inspection on work performed by sub-contractors must be forwarded through you or your general contractor. Unless we are notified otherwise, we will assume that your general contractor has been given authority to act as the owners' representative and all field or general communications concerning the construction activities will be directed through him. The construction observation and material testing services are billed on a time and expense basis. A monthly invoice will be prepared and sent to you for these services. . The invoice is due within 30 days of the invoice date. We require a 24-hour notice for scheduling construction observation services. The services described herein will be performed as needed and billed on the basis of time and expense. Labor and lab testing services will be billed at the established rate at . time of billing (currently $45.00 per hour for a technician, $65.00 per hour for the Project Manager and $110.00 per hour for a geotechnical engineer). We estimate the cost of construction observation services as outlined above to be approximately $13,000.00. This estimate is based on $3,600.00 for sanitary sewer inspection, $1,250.00 for storm drainage and subgrade preparation, $1,600.00 for curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and $1,850.00 for gravel and paving inspection. We also estimate that our costs associated with sewer as-builts and certification to be $2,100.00, and $2,600.00 for project certification, submittals and project closeout. We will not exceed our $13,000.00 total estimate without your authorization. This cost does not include costs associated with bond reduction requests or drywell testing. If requested, these services will be billed as a special service. It is understood that any project facilities constructed without adequate construction observation and documentation by STI Northwest wilt be removed and reconstructed in accordance with approved project plans and Spokane County Specifications, or STI will not be responsible for project certification or submission of record drawings to the County Engineer. • ` 8uster Heitman September 9, 2002 Shetley Lake Faunh Addition Construction Inspection P-02078 STI Northwest Page 4 REMARKS We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposai, and we look farward to serving your inspection needs. For your convenience, we have submitted two copies of this proposal letter. Our services can be authorized by having an appropriate representative sign and return one copy to us. Piease understand that the authorizing organization assumes ultimate responsibility for payment of our services. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. . Sincerely, . Accepted by, STI Nor-thwest Bob Graham ~ (Signature and Date) Civil Projects Manager , 'a Paul T. Nelson, P.E.' (Name and Title) Associate s WORK AUTHORIZATION ATTACHMENT "B" NOTICE TO OWNER OF RIGHT TO CLAIM A LIEN IMPORTANT: READ BOTH PAGES OF THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY TO: Landmark Develooment TO: Buster Heitman Owner Agent/Contractor FROM: STI NORTHWEST - DATE: Sept. 9, 2002 PROJECT;_~elley Lake Fourth Addition PROJECT THIS IS NOT A LIEN: This notice is sent to you to tell you who is providing professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of your property and to advise you of the rights of these persons and your responsibilities. Also take note that laborers on your project may claim a lien without sending you a notice. OWNER/OCCUPIER OF EXtSTING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: Under Washington law, those who furnish labor, professional services, materials or equipment for the repair, remodel, or alteration of your owner-occupied principal residence and who are not paid, have a right to enforce their claim for payment against your property. This claim is known as a construction lien. The law limits the amount that a lien claimant can claim against your 'property. Claims may only be made against that portion of the contract price you have not yet paid to your prime contractor as of the time this notice was given to you or three days after this notice was mailed to you. Review the second page of this notice for more information and ways to avoid lien claims. . COMMERCIAL AND/OR NEVU RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: We have or will be . providing professional services, materials, or equipment for the improvement of your commercial or new residential project. In the event you or your contractor fail to pay us, we may file a lien against your property. A lien may be claimed for all professional services, materials or equipment furnished after a date that is sixty days before this notice was given to you or mailed to you, unless the improvement to your property is the construction of a new single-family residence, then ten days before this notice was given to you or mailed to you. IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON NEXT PAGE STI ATTACHMENT 6 PAGE 1 OF 2 ' . . SENDER: STI NORTHWEST ADDRESS: 2214 East Riverside SPOKANE, WA 99202 TELEPHONE: (509) 534-9711 Brief description of professional services, materials, or equipment provided or to be provided: Professional engineering and related services. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR YOUR PROTECTION: This notice is sent to inform you that we have or will provide professional services, materials or equipment for the improvement of your property. We expect to be paid by the person who ordered our services, but if we are not paid, we have the right to enforce our claim by filing a construction lien against your property. LEARN more about the lien laws and the meaning of this notice by discussing them with your contractor, suppliers, Department of Labor and Industries, the firm sending you this notice, your lender, or your attorney. COMMON METHODS TO AVOID CONSTRUCTION LIENS: There are several methods available to protect your property from construction liens. The following are two of the more commonly used methods. . DUAL PAYCHECK (Joint Checks): When paying your contractor for services or materials, you may make checks payable to the contractor and the firms furnishing you *this notice. LIEN RELEASES: You may require your contractor to provide lien releases signed by all the suppliers and subcontractors from whom you have received this notice. If they cannot obtain lien releases because you have not paid them, you may use the dual payee check - method to protect yourself. . D YOU SHOULD TAKE APPROPRIATE STEPS TO PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY FROM LIENS. YOUR PRIME CONTRACTOR AND YOUR CONSTRUCTION LENDER ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO GIVE YOU WRITTEN INFORMATION ABOUT LIEN CLAIMS. IF YOU HAVE NOT RECEIVED IT, ASK THEM FOR IT. STI ATTACHMENT B PAGE20F2 . - ~ , Engineering 327 W 8"' Ave, Suite 202 . . Spokane, WA 99204 ' i (509) 744-0300 (509) 744-0304 fax Letter of Transmittal Date: December 8, ZooS To: , From: Sandra Raskell, P.E. Connie Saywers City Of Spokane Valley Saywers Engineering 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 327 W 8Ih Ave, Suite 202 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99204 Sandra, We are submitting mylars of the drainage report revisions on Shelley Lake 4th Addition. Sincerely, Sax~ ut," Connie Saywers Office Manager D ~ _::V DEC 0 9 24~5 D 1 WDE-Wr l > > ~ Page 1 of 2 t Merrijean Gadd From: Gianna Adams [enginerdlady@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:54 PM To: Sandra Raskell Subject: R . Thank you very much. I will get these printed and submit them to you tomorrow. From: Sandra Raskell [mailto:SRaskell@spokanevalley.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:50 PM To: Gianna Adams Subject: RE: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Resubmittal I am ok to submit Mylars. I have attached the "Approved for Construction" block to place on the plan sheets before printing. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Sandra -----0riginal Message----- From: Gianna Adams [mailto:enginerdlady@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:08 PM To: Sandra Raskell Subject: RE: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Resubmittal Yes I did. They are both Section 24, Township 25 Range 44 in Spokane Valley. From: Sandra Raskell [mailto:SRaskell@spokanevalley.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:59 PM ' To: Gianna Adams Subject: RE: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Resubmittal Did you change the Section Township Range? -----Original Message - . From: Gianna Adams [maifto:enginerdlady@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:17 PM To: Sandra Raskell Subject: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Resubmittal Sandra, Here are the pdfs for the revised plan sheets. I did leave the Spokane County Road and Sewer Standards, but changed the Stormwater to City of Spokane Valley. If there is anything else that you need on that, let me know and I will get it to you as quickly as possible. Sincerely, G IAN NA ADAMS,, E IT DESIGN ENGINEER 12/9/2005 , - , Page 2 of 2 L ~ SAYWERS ENGINEERING 327 W 8TH AVE, SUITE 202 SPOKANE. WA 99204 (509) 744-0300 (509) 744-0304 Fax 12/9/2005 , . Page 1 of 1 ~ Merrijean Gadd From: Gianna Adams [enginerdlady@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:17 PM To: Sandra Raskell Subject: . Attachments: 4TH ADDITION COVER 12-7-05.pdf; 4TH ADDITION P AND P 12-7-05.pdf Sandra, Here are the pdfs for the revised plan sheets. I did leave the Spokane County Road and Sewer Standards, but changed the Stormwater to City of Spokane Valley. If there is anything else that you need on that, let me know and I will get it to you as quickly as possible. Sincerely, GIANNA ADAMS, EIT DESIGN ENGINEER SAYWERS ENGINEERING 327 W 6TH AVE, SUITE 202 SPOKANE, WA 99204 (509) 744-0300 (509) 744-0304 FAX 12/9/2005 ~ ~ ! 1 ~ 1 ;p ~ o ~ 1 s+ PD w ~ ~ 32 ~-o . _ _ , +oa ~ 21 +00 ~ L ,ELAKEsLN. ~ SHE ~ o ~ ~IN ~ ► ~ 1 ' I , ~ I ~ ~ N 1 ~ t:~I I! b ~ 6£ o . ~ ~o . ~ X~ ~ 1 ~ a 1~ I. : Zb~ I ~ ~ , 23+00 I 9~00 +oa 21 +00 ~ 22+00 ; 9TH LAIE 19 I °o 3 . a i A1 B OUN~ ~ / 3,,5 7*,,o < < t , t . 5Uo ~ - N OTE: - DRAINAGE EASEMENT RIPRAP PAD MUST BE INSTALLED WITH FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO OR EQUAL) BETWEEN THE NATIVE SOIL AND ~ THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK. _ - ~ La RIPRAP PAD DIMENSIONS POND ~ 3Do ~ La ~ W ~ STONE SIZE ~ THICK. IC' 4.5' 20.1 ' 12.5' 10" MIN. 28' W 1 5 T~' TYP CAL R PRAP PAD - - ~ ~ ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ ~ ~ • C \ ~ GRAPHIC SCALE 50 o 25 so 100 so ~ ( nN FEET ) i inch = 50 ft VERTI'WAL SCALE =1" = 10' STORM DRA NAGE NC 1. SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET FOR CATCH BASIN TYPE 2. PONDS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE REQUIREMEN' 3, ALL TREATMENT PONDS SHOWN SHALL BE ROUGH GRA[ 4, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SPOKANE VALLEY WITH A 5. ALL PONDS WITHIN THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN THE p r%MITD A~T/1D CLJ A I I f]CD['r1D1/ TLJC Dr1Alf1 nD A 11[' IAl/'1DV IA I Page 1 of 1 Merrijean Gadd From: Sandra Raskell Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:50 PM To: 'Gianna Adams' Subject: R . Attachments: SPOKANE VALLEY STREET ACCEPTANCE STAMP.dwg I am ok to submit Mylars. I have attached the "Approved for Construction" block to place on the plan sheets before printing. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Sandra -----Original Message----- From: Gianna Adams [mailto:enginerdlady@hotmail.oom] - Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:08 PM To: Sandra Raskell Subject: RE: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Resubmittal Yes I did. They are both Section 24, Township 25 Range 44 in Spokane Valley. From: Sandra Raskell [maiito:SRaskell@spokanevalley.org] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:59 PM To: Gianna Adams Subject: RE: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Resubmittal Did you change the Section Township Range? -----Original Message----- From: Gianna Adams [mailto:enginerdlady@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:17 PM To: Sandra Raskell Subject: Shelley l.ake 4th Addition Resubmittal Sandra, Here are the pdfs for the revised plan sheets. I did leave the Spokane County Road and Sewer Standards, but changed the Stormwater to City of Spokane Valley. If there is anything else that you need on that, let me know and I will get it to you as quickly as possible. Sincerely, GIANNA ADAMS, EIT DE51GN ENGINEER SAYWERS ENGINEERING 327 W BTH AVE, SUITE 202 SPOKANE, WA 99204 (509) 744-0300 (509) 744-0304 FAx 12/9/2005 C1T1' UF p~ ne ley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org December 1, 2005 Gianna Adams Sawyers Engineering 327 W. 8h Ave, Ste 240 Spokane, WA 99204 Re: S6elly Lake 4t6 Addition Pond Changes (PE-1750D) Public Works has reviewed your November 11, 2005 submittal for the above referenced project. Please address the following items on you next submittal: Plan Sheets 1. The Section, Township, and Range on Sheets 1 and 2 differ. 2. Add the Engineer's Certification Statement. For reference please see 2001 Spokane Couniy Road and Sewer Standards page 5-3. If you have any further questions, please conta.ct me via email at sraskell(~a,spokanevallev.ora or by phone at (509) 688-0174. . Sincerely, . Sandra Raskell, P.E. - Development Engineer cc: Robert Heitman - Property Owner Community Development Department . ~ n~ c~ , n~ SC, ,,;0*Va11ey 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org R~ _ . _ . . _ -a:',.~ii „a,~ ± t.~:t.~n. . - - . . . _ r - • - _ _ _ • October 5, 2005 Gianna Adams Sawyers Engineering 327 W. 86' Ave, Ste 240 Spokane, WA 99204 Re: Shelly Lake 4tn Addition Pond Changes (PE-1750D) Public Works has received your September 22, 2005 submittal for the above referenced project: The following items shall be addressed on your next submittal: Plan Sheets 1. Please revise the treatrnent pond note to read, "For construction of drywells, install filter fabric (Amoco 4545 or equivalent) between the washed drainrock and the native soils." 2. Update Storm Drainage Note 7 to reference Spokane Valley. Drainagc Report , 1. In the pipe network calculations, the catch basins do not appear to have the required 0.75' of freeboard (see GSM page 4-3). Please address. General 1. An easement for the drainage pond is required. Please subnut easement language for approval prior to recording. 2. Once all items are addressed, the City may approve the design changes for the 4th Addition only. This will not be an approval for the 5th Addition. These comments are for this submittal only for the Public Works Department. Community Development may require further information. If you have any further questions, please contact via email at sraskellasnokanevallev.orp- or by phone at (509) 688-0174. Since, ely, Sandra Raskell, P.E. Development Engineer cc: Robert Heitman - Property Owner Marina Sukup - Community Development Director Karen Kendall- Associate Planner ec ile I ' Page 1 of 1 Merrijean Gadd From: Sandra Raskell Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:40 AM To: Marina Sukup Subject: R"NOMy Lake 4 , Thanks. - -----0riginal Message----- From: Marina Sukup Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:38 AM To: Sandra Raskell Subject: Shelley Lake 4 Sandra: The proposed drainage modifications are located outside the regulatory floodplain. Marina M. Sukup, AICP, CFM Director of Community DevelopmenUPlanning City of Spokane Valley 11707 Sprague Avenue, Ste. 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 • . 10/7/2005 V ~ ~ • Saywe4 , S~~ 2 2 2u05 Eng~n~~~ 327 W 8~' Ave, Suit Spokane, WA 9920 p 1l! (509) 744A300 (509) 744-0302 fax Letter of Transmittal Date: September 21, ZooS To: From: Sandra Raskell, P.E. Gianna Adams Development Engineer Saywers Engineering City of Spokane Valley 327 W 8`h Ave, Suite 240 Department of Public Works Spokane, WA 99204 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106 SDokane Vallev. WA 99260 Sandra, We are responding to your comments of August 30, 2005. We have made the revisions that were requested and also added Basin D from the original submittal in the calculations for the treatment pond. This is to remove an additional small pond from the plat to reduce the required maintenance and make the project more efficient. We have also included 3 copies of the concept drainage report for Shelley Lake 5`h Addition for an initial review. If you have any questions, feel free to contact us. Sincerely, ~ Gianna Adams, EIT Design Engineer Enclosures: 2 sets full-size Storm water Drainage Ptans - Shelley Lake 4th 1 copy Drainage Report Addendum - Shelley Lake 4th 1 copy Response to Comments - Shelley Lake 4th 3 copies Concept Drainage Report - Shelley Lake 5th It ~ $a 9werr Engineering 327 W 8~' Ave, Suite 240 ISpokane, WA 99204 (509) 744-0300 744-0302 fax September 21, 2005 Sandra Raskell, P.E. Development Engineer City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99260 Subject: Shelley Lake 41h Addition - Drainage Revision 2°d Submittal Response Ms. Raskell, We have reviewed your comments from August 30, 2005 regarding the submittal of the drainage design documents for the above noted project. We have addressed your concerns below. The original comment is shown in italics and our response follows in boldface type. Plan Sheets 1. Pond C reguires a maintenance access and.fencing due to the depth and square footage of the pond. Please update the plans to indicate the maintenance access road location and design elements. This shall.follow the 1998 Stormwater Guidelines. Please indicate the fencirtg type and limits.. We have revised the plans to show a 12' maintenance access road from Shelley Lakc Lane to the pond bortom. We have also added 6' fencing surrounding the pond and a 14' wide gate across the access road. 2. Include a swale cross section and label proposed swale contours. ' A typical pond cross section has been added to the plans and the swale contours have been labeled. 3. Please inclicde catch basin and pipe information on the plan sheets for all of pipe network C. Notes have been added to the plan sheet for pipe network C calling out the existing pipe and structures. Drainage Report 1. In the Drainage Repof-t, it appears the calculated treatment volume r•equired using Ordinance 05- 013 methodology (Table 2), does not account for all of the impervious areas (Table 1). Please clarify and update table and calculations. The total impervious area reported in Table 2 includes rooftops, which do not require treatment. The labels for the table have been revised to clarify how much area requires treatment. The areas did increase as we have added Basin D to this pond as well. ' 1 2. Please submit pond volume sizing calculations. Due to the increased area drainiog to t6e pond, we have modified the hydrologic calculations to use the SCS method instead of the bowstring. The HydroCAD reports have been attached with the pond volume sizing calculations included. 3. In the pipe network culculatdons, please include water surface elevations at each catch busin. The hydraulic calculations have been revised to include the additional flow from Basin D and the table 6as been modified to include hydraulic grade line elevations at eacb catch basin. 4. Revise basi» map's engineer certification statement to include City of Spokane Valley. Tbe basin map included with the previous submittal was the original map provided by CLC Associates. The engineer's statement is not applicable to a basin map, so we revised the basin map to completely remove the statement. 5. There are discrepancies on the volumes indicated in the report and volumes indicuted on the pluns. Please update. The volumes reported in the report and on the plans were not consistent and have been clarified. The volume in the report is the treatment volume instead of tbe total volume of the pond. The treatmeDt volume has been added to the plans to reduce confusion. Gener•al Notes 1. Any approval of these changes if for 4"' Addition only. Any future additions will need to be reviewed prior to final plan approval. Noted. 5`h Addition will be submitted separately for review and approval. 2. Although you note additional copies were included to be given to Marina Sukup, we do not have these copies. Please coordinate directly with her on floodplain Yequirements. Further information may be required by her. I apologize for the confusion. I am not sure where the extra copy went, but I am submitting 2 copies to you and 1 to Marina Sukup in a separate package to avoid further confusion. 3. It is unclear on the 5"' Addition preliminary plat map if the pipe from CBS to the pond outlet will be included in the pond tract or as an easement. Tliis shall be clearly updated. Also on the plat map, pleuse add the approximate location und size of the pond. ~ A note has been added to the plans for this submittal that the pipe and access road are within the drainage tract. The '5`h Addition plat map will be updated with the pond information and clarification of the limits of the drainage tract. We have included two sets of plans with this submittal. If you have any questions, please contact us at 744-0300. Sincerely, Gianna Adams, EIT Saywers Engineering cc: Robert Heitman/ Project Applicant; Proj ect file 2 a i~ . S cmp6Mane le . . a y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org August 30, 2005 Gianna Adams Sawyers Engineering 327 W. 8th Ave, Ste 240 Spokane, WA 99204 Re: Shelly Lake 4th Addition Pond Changes (PE-1750D) Public Works has received your August 10, 2005 submittal for the above referenced project. The followi.ng items shall be addressed on your next submittal. Plan Sheets . Pond C requires a maintenance access and fencing due to the depth and square footage of the pond. Please update the plans to indicate the maintenance access road location and design elements. This shall follow the 1998 Stormwater . Guidelines. Please indicate the fencing type and limits. - Iriclude a swale cross section and label proposed swale contours. >---flease include catch basin and pipe information on the plan sheets for a11 of pipe network C. Drainage Report . In the Drainage Report, it appears the calculated treatment volume required using Ordinance 05-013 methodology (Table 2), does not account for all of the ' pervious areas (Table 1). Please clarify and update table and calculations. . Please submit pond volume sizing calculations. 3. In tlle pipe network calculations, please include water surface elevations at each ~ ~catch basin. 2 . Revise basin maP's engineer certification statement to include CitY of SPokane ~ V ley. 5 There are.discrepancies on the volumes indicated in the report and volumes indicated on the plans. Please update. ~ AGeneral Notes ~ v ~ 1 y approval of these changes is for 4~' Addition only. Any future additions will ~ 1ry~ need to reviewed prior to final plan approval. ~m ~ 1~ - . e . ~ 2 Although you note additional copies were included to be given to Marina Sukup, we do not have these copies. Please coordinate directly with her on floodplain requirements. Further i.nformation may be required by her. . It is unclear on the 5hAddition preliminary plat map if the pipe from CBS to the . ~~pond outlet will be included in the pond tract or as an easement. This shall be 'l1 clearly updated. Also on the plat map, please add the approximate location and V" size of the pond. ~7questions, ese comments are for this subnuttal only for the Public Works Department. ommunity Development may require further information. If you have any further please contact via email at sraskell(@spokanevallev.org or by phone at (509) 688-0174. Sincerely, . Sandra Raskell, P.E. Development Engineer cc: Robert Heitman - Property Owner Marina Sukup - Community Development Director Karen Kendall - Associate Planner Department of Public Works - Development Project File . / ~ . , ~ - , „ - -y, . • r C ~`•~1 ~j~ ~ - . . . ~;~r . . . ~ / ' ~ ` ~ ~ / 6 ~ ~ . d g a y~ rA :a n 1 ~ - ' / r • ' ~i^'~ r ~ 1 _ ' • ♦ " -w • ' . lS.L , _ Letter of Transmitta. ° ~ Date: August 10, 2005 " ~ O U D11~ ~ > ~ . To: From: Sandra Raskell, P. E. Gianna Adams Development Engineer Saywers Engineering City of Spokane Valley 327 W 8t" Ave, Suite 240 Department of Public Works Spokane, WA 99204 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106 Sookane Vatlev. WA 99260 . . . . ~ . , _ . . . -----..-e-_w..,... Sandra, We are responding to the comments provided to CLC Qssociates in May, 2004. We have revised the drainage plan for Basin C in order to more effectively treat and dispose of the storm water runoff. We have also included an extra set of plans for review by Marina Sukup and would appreciate it if you could forward those to her on our behalf. If you have any questions, feel free to contact us. Sincerely, ~ Gianna Adams, EIT Design Engineer - i -E nn t c _E - . ; V Enclosures. ~ ~ •L r',~f'. ~ 3 sets full-size Storm water Drainage Plans 1 copy Drainage Report Addendum 1 copy Response to Comments lJ ~ ~ ~I ~ • i August 10, 2005 Sandra Raskell, P.E. Deve[opment Engineer City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99260 Subject: Shelley Lake 4tb Addition - Drafnage Revfsion Submittal Response Ms. Raskell, We have reviewed your comments from May 14, 2004 regarding the submittal of the drainage design documents for the above noted project. We have addressed your concerns below. The original comment is shown in italics and our response follows in boldface type. 1. The pond bottom shall not be included in the outflow rate calculations for quantity control. This is tv be used for the quality treatment (the first %-inch of runoffl. Please update yvur basin calculations to re, f lect this change. Only the 0. 4 cfs for the rock shall be used. We have revised the plans to reroute the flow from drainage basin C to a new pond located in the drainage tract to the east of the current pond locations. The rock sump has been deleted from the plans and a permanent pond with two drywells has been designed. The attached report details the calculations aod requirements for the pond and demonstrates that the runoff requiremeats for the City of Spokane Valley are met. 2. Include an inlet grate for the riser. The riser in t6e temporary pond has been deleted. T6e drywells 6ave been called out referring to the standard plans from Spokane County. 3. Include a swale cross section. The permanent pond details are provided in the attached plan. A cross section has not been included as it is a straight forward plan with 3:1 side slopes and no temporary structures. If a crnss section is still required, we will be happy to provide any information requested. 4. Include a discussiorr of the reasoning behind the use of the rock outflow device. Include explcmations of siltation concerns, height of the riser, reasoning of the deviation, and maintenance. A design deviation letter is required for this device. Please include in the next submittal. This is not a guarantee of approval. . The rock sump device has been removed from the plans. . S. The bowstring, although initially shows a decrease in volume, does not go negatrve, and it starts to increase on the last time increment. Please extend the time to show a continuous decrease of vulume. _ The bowstring 6as been revised to be more accurate. 6 Instead of sign posts, please use barricnde for the end of the road along with proper signing. This is a safety concern area with the temporary pond located there. The temporary pond has been removed from the plans so that there is no safety concern in t6at area. . . ~ We have included two sets of plans with this submittal. We would appreciate it if you could please forward one set to Marina Sukup for floodplain evaluation. If you have any questions, please contact us at 744-0300. Sincer , ~ • , V Joh.Saywers, P.E. Saywers Engineering cc: Robert Heitman/ Project Applicant; Project file ~ e . crn• 00 op; Valle y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fau: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityfiall@spokanevalley.org Fax To: John Saywers, P.E. From: Sandr~a Raskell Fax: 744-0302 Pages: 2(including cover) Re: Shelley Lake 4t' Addition Pond Date: 11-23-04 John, Here is the letter written to Aqm4I. See you tomorrow. Thanks, Sandra , Sookoane ' OF l~ 11 707 E 5Prague Ave Suite 106 ♦ SPokane ValleY WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityfiall@spokanevalley.org May 14, 2004 Autumn Friday, EIT CLC Associates 12730 E. Mirabeau Parkway, Suite 100 Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Re: Shelly Lake 4h Addition Pond Changes Public Works has received your submittal for the above mentioned project. The following items shall be addressed on your next submittal. 1. The pond bottom shall not be included in the outflow rate calculations for quantity control. This is to be used for the quality treatment (the first %2-inch of runof). Please upda.te your basin calculations to reflect this change. Only the 0.4 cfs for the rock sha11 be used. 2. Include an inlet grate for the riser. 3. Include a swale cross section. 4. Include a discussion of the reasoning behind the use of the rock outflow device. Include explanations of siltation concerns, height of the riser, reasoning of the deviation, and maintenance. A design deviation letter is required for this device. Please include in the next submittal. This is not a guarantee of approval. 5. The bowstring, although initially shows a decrease in volume, does not go negative, and it starts to increase on the last time increment. Please extend the time to show a continuous decrease of volume. 6. Instead of sign posts, please use barricade for the end of the road along with proper signing. This is a safety concem area with the temporary pond located there. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 688-0174. Sinc ely, Sandra Raskell, P.E. Assistant Development Engineer cc: Department of Public Works - Development Project File S crn, p .I1e ~ Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Fax To: Ryan Spidahl From: Sandra Raskell Fax: 624-8153 Pages: 2(including cover) Re: Shelly Lake 4`" Addition Date: 7-21-04 Here are the comments. Thanks, Sandra ~ • , ~ Sookan.e. ,,;;0OValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallpspokanevalley.org May 14, 2004 Autumn Friday, EIT CLC Associates 12730 E. Mirabeau Parkway, Suite 100 Spokane Va11ey, WA 99216 Re: Shelly Lake 4h Addition Pond Changes Public Works has received your submittal for the above mentioned project. The following items shall be addressed on your next submitta.l. 1. The pond bottom shall not be included in the outflow rate calculations for quantity control. This is to be used for the quality treatment (the first 1/z-inch of runof Please upda.te your basin calculations to reflect this change. Only the 0.4 cfs for the rock shall be used. 2. Include an inlet grate for the riser. 3. Include a swale cross section. 4. Include a discussion of the reasoning behind the use of the rock outflow device. Include explanations of siltation concerns, height of the riser, reasoning of the deviation, and maintenance. A design deviation letter is required for this device. Please include in the next submittal. This is not a guarantee of approval. 5. The bowstring, although initially shows a decrease in volume, does not go negative, and it starts to increase on the last time increment. Please extend the time to show a continuous decrease of volume. 6. Instead of sign posts, please use barricade for the end of the road along with proper signing. This is a safety concern area with the temporary pond located there. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 688-0174. Sincerel Sandra Raskell, P.E. Assistant Development Engineer cc: Department of Public Works - Development Project File ay~ Or po n~ lle a Y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org May 14, 2004 Autumn Friday, EIT CLC Associates 12730 E. Mirabeau Parkway, Suite 100 Spokane Va11ey, WA 99216 Re: Shelly Lake 4th Addition Pond Changes Public Works has received your submittal for the above mentioned project. The following items sha11 be addressed on your next submittal. 1. The pond bottom sha11 not be included in the outflow rate calculations for quantity control. This is to be used for the quality treatment (the first '/~-inch of runof~. Please update your basin calculations to reflect this change. Only the 0.4 cfs for the rock shall be used. 2. Include an inlet grate for the riser. 3. Include a swale cross section. 4. Include a discussion of the reasoning behind the use of the rock outflow device. Include explanations of siltation concerns, height of the riser, reasoning of the deviation, and maintenance. A design deviation letter is required for this device. Please include in the next subm.ittal. This is not a gua.rantee of approval. 5. The bowstring, although initially shows a decrease in volume, does not go negative, and it starts to increase on the last ti.me increment. Please extend the tixne to show a continuous decrease of volume. 6. Instead of sign posts, please use barricade for the end of the road along with proper signing. This is a safety concem area with the temporary pond located there. If you have any further questions, please contact me at 688-0174. Sincerely, ~ , Sandra Raskell, P.E. Assistant Development Engineer cc: Department of Public Works - Development Proj ect File CLC A550CIATE5 April 28, 2004 City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: Shelley Lake 4`h Addition ATTN: Sandra Raskell, P.E. Dear Sandra, I have recently met with you and John Hohman regarding the proposed drainage changes at Shelley Lake 4`" Addition. The proposed changes consist of moving the pond that was previously located on lot 5 to the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane. The proposed pond will be a temporary facility with gravel galleries. The intent is to remove the pond and incorporate the drainage with Shelley Lake Sth Addition. Attached with this letter I have enclosed a complete set of the approved streetldrainage plans from Spokane County and the revised sheets 3 and 7. All revisions have been highlighted for your review. I have also included a revised drainage report and calculations. Basins C1 and C2 changed to incorporate the larger area. Due to the changes in basin sizes revised bowstring, inlet, and pipe calculations have been included in this submittal. . I appreciate your time on this issue and if you have any questions or concerns please contact me at 458-6840. Sincerely, Autumn Friday, EIT ~ CLC Associates ~ MAY 0 4 2004 cc: file D o ~ P V ~ 12730 EAST MIRABEAU PARKWAY • SUITE 1 00 • SPOKANE VALLEY • WA 9921 6• P 509 458 6840 • F 509 458 6644 DENVER • PHOENIX • SALT LAKE CITY • SPOKANE ~:NEIL THOMPSON - FAX N0. :9249728 Apr. 20 2004 12:54PM P1 ~ . A.. . . ~ ~ ' -,•y;, . y~~,Y~ ~y 1"u.,;.,. ,•:f.~,t. 1 ~ iS~ . • "'.~V! ~ ~ ' tiY~. •I~ ~t~ t r i , ` • : < ~ :Tj'F. .^as 1.• ..1' Ai' •:i ~y,N w .S `r' S, 'T ~.t~`4~`'' .i To:_..._..,.~~,!~~ F'rom: Neil ThoiYipsan Fa,x; Witli: 1'o.mlinson I31.acl.c Vall.ey, Inc. Fax No: (509) 924-9728 Dat.e: ~i~/,.C 0.. , . No. oi' 13ages: ~ - I;e. e.-a-5. v' Z-'i 40 10' A:2-'e-I" Toinlinsoli Blac)c viil . ~ . ~ . . ~ ° C)fl iCe; (SU`)) 922-7400 C:clluldr; (509) 954-5232 Homc: ,(509) 922-2853 E-Mail: ncilta),dirccwa,y.com Wcbsitc: www.aiciltlioinosoti zicl ~ FROM':NEIL THOMPSON FAX NO. :9249728 ,-.Apr. 20 2004 12:54PM P2 _ e C1..C A55OCIATE5 April 15, 2004 CLC #99029 Kathy Moore/Neil Thompson Tomlinson Black Valiey 721 North Pines Road . Spokane, Washington 99207 RE: Pond S at Shelley Lake 2"d Addition qear Kathy/Neil: Enclosed please find a copy of the as-built survey done at your request at the location of Pond B in Shelley Lake 2"d Addition. Please note the following: a 1. The elevation of the pond boftom was set to contain a certain volume of water at a certain depth below the curb inlet. The as-built pond boftom elevations indicate that the pond boftom is not deep enough, and it is not level. Volume calculations are based on not greater than 1°/a sfope in the pond bottom. the pond boftom elevation per plan is 2034.08. The pond boftom would need to be lowered to 2034.18 (see #2) and leveled to not more than a 1% slope to match the approved pond detail. 2. The drywell grate elevation per plan is 2034.76.The grate elevation must be .67' (8 inches) above the finished pond boftom elevation ta provide a w volume for water quality ('208') treatment. The drywell grate elevation is 2034.85. The pond boftom elevation must be 2034.85-.67=2034.18 to allow for adequate '208' treatment. - 3. There are two requirements for pond sizing for this area. First, the , bottom area must be of a certain size for water quality treatment volume. Second, the pond must be sized to contain a certain design storm volume. The pond bottom area is currentiy not large to contain the required storm volume or water quality treatment volume. It. appears that within the tract area east of the pond, there is enough area to provide some additional volume. In order to provide enough capacity for the water quality treatment volume, the boftom area must be about 900 square feet. The 10-year design storm volume would then be contained in approximately 1.25'. Because the pond is within a tract, per page 5-19 of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, which the City of the Valley has EA9T MIRABIZnlJ 0A8iKwAV - rju►TE 1 00 • sr~oKANE vALLEr . wq 992 1 E, . P 5UV agB 694d • F 509 458 61944 DF:NVF_1Z . PHdENIX . SAI,.T L^K~ CITY • ZpdIGANE / ~ ` FROM':NEIL THOMPSON FAX N0. :9249728 qpr. 20 2004 12:55PM P3 adopted, the design storm volume can be contained in greater than a 1' depth. 4. The requirement for side slope is a maximum of 3:1. The as-built side slope from the south side of the pond to the house elevation is approximately 2:1. The City of the Valley may require fencing or a wall in order to meet side slope requirements. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you, Sincerely, CLC ASSOCIATES ~ - Susan Murphy Vice President SKM/skm , . Enc. . ~ FROM ':NEIL THOMPSON FAX NO. :924T9728 Apr. 20 2004 12:55PM P4 r. , ~ ~1 C • , i r~ pm / o 0 ~ N ~ o0 ~ • _ c~ ~ TI m - i~ C-• A i ~ t~' ~ -3~ R 1 3 ~ ' `~i'~'' ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ' ~ . . (n ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ . ~ r ~ i i i ~►~i~ii►~ii~~~.~~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ` ~~~~=~~pa ~I~ ~~i•.`~~i ~ J-3 i;~1;i~[i ;~1 CA ~ ~ I►iji~~i~~.`, ~ ~ j ~ ~ i ~ rl `l' ~ I q\ ~ i!iii~ii~, ~ i i 1a i ~ • ~ a 1 Ii 1r i ~ 1 Ii ° ;'~1 1, ~~~,~,~~j~'~.~ ~ ; ~I S/ Il Ilii~ i I1i;i ii i 23i ii i 1 r►iil~~ ~ 1.11 I ~ 1 1% p I CQ . ~ ii~i'1,{iitii i g ~ ' % ~ ' I ~ lit II i L ~ ts / 111 < i . j 1 ~ ~ I ~ I 1 ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ro ~ ~iiiri F~Il1j~fl~~i~j ( ~ I j~ I ~ I 1 i iii- I f~ F y~ r ~~,i~ii 'i ~ ~d~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~ I~ ~ < < ,s , ~ P~ r~~r 1 ~ / i 1 ~ I~~ ; 1• ~1 p1~- ; i f ~ flift, ii r;iiji I j ~~~1~'r~\ `Lr r •I l/~~/L1 ~ I N C" ~ - i O O . i . 1 ~ i i.~♦ ~ - _ ~ Li+l -Ij st co 1 / . . ~ . . PE4K FLOUV CRLCULATI4N PROJECT::a~,~, BOWSTWNG METHOD PROJECT: SheUey lake 2nd Adcfdoi 90•Year Resign Storm ' .'DET'EtMQN BASIN OESIGN eASIN: B L0 OESiGNER'%~ ~ 19-Apr-04 9ASIN:~ oATF: EL Tat, Area SF 5.08 Aaes Tane Increment (mm) v ~ Imp.Area SF ~f?T~eafConc.{min} 9.71 Reiv. Ama ; - . N 201,597 SF C=:: Oudow (cfs) r., Wt C= p2.2 .,,...a~.. a.~= , Oesign Yau Fbw 10 v Area (aaas) 5.08 m CASE 1 lmpeniiaus Area (sq tt) 19689 N K;` Fader 0.22 ' R Ovuiand Fbw Wma' C 1.101 N TreaWieitt Area ~ Ct = ` ~a ~-680 fL Time Time Inc. Iniens. QQeva1. Vd.ln VdAul Stoaage n= =6A9 fminl (sec) (inlhri (cfisl fcv ft? fa ftl (cu R) S= 9.71 582 227 2.50 1951 592 1368 Tc = 8.65 man., by EqLLa6on 3.2 of Guidelines 5 300 3,19 3.51 1412 300 1112 10 600 224 2.47 1968 600 1368 ~ 26D.R Gutter fiow 15 900 1.78 1.96 2152 900 1252 20 1200 1,44 1.59 2216 1200 1016 tI _ ..'-..•';~`~:0 ForZ2 25 1500 1,21 1.33 2262 1500 762 Z2 = 3:5 Type 8=1.0 30 1800 1,04 1.15 2288 1 B00 468 N n_ '0A16 Roled = 3.5 35 2104 0.91 1.00 2302 2100 202 0.~• 44 2400 0.83 4,91 2314 2400 -26 45 2700 0.74 0,81 2361 2700 -339 N d= ::0;1725 ft 54 3000 0.69 0,76 2430 3000 -670 m . " 55 3340 0.64 0,10 2465 3340 -835 60 3600 0.61 0.67 2551 3600 t-1049 o A R Q Tc Tctolsl I (k 65 3900 0.59 0,65 2662 3900 -1238 Z X 0.80 0.09 2,50 1.06 9.71 221 250 70 4200 0.57 0.63 2764 4200 -1440 Q 75 4544 0.55 4.61 2845 4590 -1655 L.- Oqeak fut Case 1= 250 tfs 80 4840 0.53 0.58 2911 4840 -1883 85 5100 0.51 0,56 2975 5100 -2125 90 5440 0.50 0.56 3082 5400 •2318 95 5700 0.49 054 3182 5700 -2518 CASE 2 100 6440 0.46 0,53 3276 6000 -2724 Case 2 assumes a Tirne o! Canoe,naatition kess than 5 minutes sb that tfie '288" TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS peak Uv =.90(TF5 iritensity)(imp. Area) = 1.30 cfs ` Minimum 0206' Vdume Reqoired 594 cu ft Provided TreaCnerrtValume w ft DRYWELL REQUIREMEMS - 50 YFAR DESIGN STORM So, thz Peak fb~ow tnr the 8asin is the greater af the tac flows, Maxanum Storage Required by 6awstring 1368 ou ft 1.50 cts o ProvkdeQ S~arage Volume LO Number and TyDe af Drywelis Required 0 Single ~ t Dauble 0 z ~ J W Z, . •0 . x LL . ! January 31,2003 CLC A55DCIATE5 Spokane County ~~~I V E D' Division of Engineering and Roads FES 03 2003 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 SFOKANE COUNTY ENGiNEER' Attn: Gloria Mantz, P.E. RE: P 1750-Shelley. Lake 4'h Addition Final Submittal Dear Gloria, Enclosed with this letter I have included a set of mylars for your approval. Below are our comments to the issues from the last review. _ 1. The drywell in Tract D has been moved so it can be accessed from 9th Lane, therefore a gravel access road will not be needed at the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane. 2. The berm for Pond A has been set 0.20' higher than the top of curb of the lowest inlet. The top of curb elevation of the lowest inlet is 2049.88', and the top of berm elevation for Pond A is set at 2050.08'. This is consistent with the typical swale detail provided in the plan set. This submittal has addressed all issues from out last submittal if you have any comments or questions please contact me at 509-458-6840. Sincerely, CLC Associates 4Dou esmond, P.E. Proj ect Engineer cc: file Encl: Shelley Lake plan set (mylars) 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE' • SUITE 200 • SPOKANE • WA 99204 • P 509 456 6840 • F 509 458 6844 DENVER • SPOKANE • SALT LAKE CITY . a y~ . C% T~~3 ~ L S P O KYk N E „ C O U N'Y' Y , DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DTVLSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT January 28, 2003 ~ Jpg# Doug Desmond, P.E. zCLC Associates, Inc. CC: List InItia! W. 707 7`h Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 4"' Additioo ~ Road and Drainage Submittal #3 Doug: Thank you for addressing our concerns in your January 23, 2003 submittal of the road and drainage design documents for this project. There are a couple of issues that need to be resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: 1. Provide a gravel access at the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane so the drywell in Tract D can be maintained. 2. It appears that the berm for Pond A needs to be raised so it is above the top of the curb inlets and for consistency with the typical swale detail. Since these are relatively minor issues, you are authorized to submit mylars. Our department will review the plans to verify the revisions before final acceptance of the plans. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager ~r) ~ ~ , I Gloria M. Mant , P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning Proj ect file . 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 EAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 / d . ~ ~ I S P O K A N E ' . C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT January 28, 2003 Doug Desmond, P.E. CLC Associates, Inc. W. 707 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 4th Addition Road and Drainage Submittal #3 Doug: Thank you for addressing our concerns in your January 23, 2003 submittal of the road and drainage design documents for this project. Theze are a couple of issues that need to be resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: 1. Provide a gravel access at the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane so the drywell in Tract D can be maintained. 2. It appears that the berm for Pond A needs to be raised so it is above the top of the curb inlets and for consistency with the typical swale detail. Since these are relatively minor issues, you are authorized to submit mylars. Our department will review the plans to verify the revisions before final acceptance of the plans. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager ~r) . Gloria M. Mant , P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant - Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning - -i 1026 W. Broadway Ave. ~ Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 ~ 707 W. 7TH AVE. T R A N 5 M I TT A L SUITE 200 SPOKANE DENVER [03 WASHINGTON 99204 P 509 458 6840 S PO KAN E F 509 458 6844 REC~~v~~ CLC A55DCIATES SALT LAKE ciTY JAN 13 2003 ~uT E E~GINEER' //Z~ A 3 T O : DA -,~C~ / A ~ PROJECT ` NAME: * PROJECT ATTN: &26-I4' ~i~-~IY (L NUMBER: ~ 020~ ~ Y v / WE ARE SENDING: , ENCLOSED , UNDER SEPARATE , DOCUMENTS COMPUTER DISCS ~ ~ 71-PRINTS REPRODUCIBLES REPORTS OTHER COPIES DESCRIPTION ~ ~ FOR YOUR USE FOR YOUR REVIEW FOR YOUR APPROVAL SENT PER YOUR REQUEST V EXPRES6 MESSENGER PICKUP U.S. MAIL REMARKS: C O PY T O: B Y: i~ r ~ CLC A550CIATE5 January 22, 2003 Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads o 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 Attn: Gloria Mantz, P.E. RE: P1750-Shelley Lake 4`" Addition ~ Road and Drainage Submittal3 Dear Gloria, • . We have adjusted our plans and report per your comments from the second submittal. Our responses to your comments are as follows: 1. The ponds for Basin B and D have been enlarged so they have the capacity to handle the 50-year runoff at a 1 foot depth. The Bowstring calculations and C' drainage report have been updated to reflect the 1 foot depth. ' 2. The peak flow rates for the flooded width calculations have been adjusted to reflect the 50-year design storm. The flooded width calculations for Basin C were taken upstream on both sides of the inlets in a sump condition. In addition, the basin map has been updated to delineate basin C 1, C2, C 1 A, and M. 3. The pipe velocities have been looked at and adjusted so we no longer have . velocities less than 4 fps. 4. The curb inlet for pond B has been adjusted to handle the design flow. The cross- slopes used for, calculations have been changed to reflect cross-slopes proposed in the plans. The drainage report and plans have been checked for consistency. ~ - . ~ 5. The plans have been updated so the riprap sizes are consistent with the drainage report. 6. A copy of the Homeowner's Association CC&R's have been included with this . submittal. _ 4 . . - . o . 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE • SUITE 200 • SPOKANE • WA 99204 • P 509 458 6840 • F 509 458 6844 DENVER • SPOKANE • SALT LAKE CITY • r Spokane County Shelley Lake 4th Addition O1/22/03 Page 2 of 2 I hope these revisions address all of your concerns. If you have any additional questions or comments please feel free to contact me at 509-458-6840. Sincerely, CLC Associates ' 1 v oug Desmon'd, P. . Project Engineer cc: file Encl: Shelley Lake plan set and Drainage Report Mantz, Gloria From: Mantz, Gloria Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:55 PM To: Susan Murphy (E-mail) Subject: P1750D Basin Map Susan, I am in the process of reviewing the latest submittal of Shelley Lake and a post-developed basin map was not included. I know there were some revisions to the basin map so I would like to have the latest one when I review the plans. Can you send a copy of the basin map? Thanks Gloria 1 • _f 1 ~ ~ J ' S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Januaiy 13, 2002 Doug Desmond, P.E. . CLC Associates, Inc. W. 707 7u' Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 4`" Addition Road and Drainage Submittal #2 Doug: We reviewed your January 6, 2002 submittal of the design documents for this project. The comments below are a follow up to the comments addressed with our October 11, 2002 letter or based upon the changes to the current submittal and need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: 1. The ponds for Basins B and D receive offsite runoff and therefore, are required to have the capacity to handle the 50-year storm. It appears fhat these ponds have the capacity for the 50-year storm when the 1' depth is exceeded. This is acceptable if fencing is provided for the ponds. 2. The peak flow rates used in the pipe, inlet, and flooded width calculations do not appear to be consistent with the peak flow rates shown in the Bowstring calculations. In addition, clarify the extent of sub-basins C1, C2, C1A and C2A. 3. The pipe calculations indicate that some pipe velocities are below the 4 fps requirement. 4. It appears that the curb inlet for Pond B does not have the capacity to handle the design flow. Please verify that all inlets have the proper capacity. In addition, check that the cross-slope used in the calculations is consistent with the proposed road cross-slopes. 5. The size of the proposed riprap pad is not consistent with the riprap calculations. _ 6. Provide a draft of the Homeowner's Association CC&R's. Thank you for your attention to these issues. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager Gloria M. Mantz, P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning 'i&lQie.c.t ` e 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 ~ Mantz, Gloria From: Susan Murphy [smurphy@clcassoc.com] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 4:48 PM To: 'Mantz, Gloria' Subject: RE: P1750D Basin Map Gloria: I found the extra basin map in the file. I'l1 have it delivered to your office tomorrow. Susan -----Original Message----- From: Mantz, Gloria [mailto:GMantz@spokanecounty.org] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 3:55 PM To: Susan Murphy (E-mail) Subject: P1750D Basin Map Susan, I am in the process of reviewing the latest submittal of Shelley Lake and a post-developed basin map was not included. I know there were some revisions to the basin map so I would like to have the latest one when I review the plans. Can you send a copy of the basin map? Thanks Gloria , 1 7o7 W. 7TH AVE. T R A N 5 M I TTA L SUITE 200 SPOKANE DENVER 09 WASHINGTDN 99204 P 509 458 6840 S PO KAN E F 509 45e 6844 CLC A55OCIATES SALT LAKE CITY 4 ~ • DATE: I/ I/~ TO: P R O J E C T e~ ~ I~'e7 'Pi rrl'w) NAM E: PROJECT ATTN: N U M B E R: ~ WE ARE SENDING: ENCLOSED UNDER SEPARATE . DOCUMENTS COMPUTER DISCS PRINTS REPRODUCIBLES REPORTS OTHER . COPIES DESCRIPTION RECEIV~ /9 JAN 10 .t SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ~ FOR YOUR USE FOR YOUR REVIEW FOR YOUR APPROVAL ~SENTPERYOUR REQUEST , EXPRESS MESSENGER PICKUP U.S. MAIL REMARKS: n C O PY TO: BY: ~ January 2, 2003 101 CLC #5020134 CLC A550CIATE5 Spokane County Public Works Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Attn: Gloria M. iViantz, P. E Subject: P 1750-Shelley Lake 4t' Addition - Road and Drainage Submittal #2 Dear Gloria: In response to your review comments,-in a letter dated October 11, 2002, the following items have been addressed: CONSTRUCTION PLANS: , 1. The plans now include callouts for the proposed street signs. 2. The general notes have been updated to refer to "2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." 3. All drywells have been moved to be located within 8 feet of the curb. 4. A transition detail has been provided for Shelly Lake Lane at about STA 19+00 on sheet 3 of 7. 5. The sight distance triangles have been added to the plan set and a vertical sight distance report has been provided. 6. Additional language has been added to the plans on sheet 6 of 7 to ensure Cation Exchange Testing is performed. The plans have been updated to be consistent with the `208' design depth. 7. The pond bottom elevations have been adjusted and grading has been added to verify that the location and size of the ponds will work. 8. Notes have been included on the cover sheet in the Storm Drainage Notes on sheet 2 of 7 regarding the irrigation system. , 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE • SUITE 200 • SPOKANE • WA 99204 • P 509 458 6840 • F 509 458 6844 DENVER • SPOKANE • SALT LAKE CITY 9. The `208' volumes have been checked and changed so that the report and plans are consistent. 10. A temporary cul-de-sac has not been added at the terminus of Shelly Lake Lane. Per the Fire Access Road Standard Bulletin B-28, a turnaround would be required if the terminus was more than 150' past the intersection. DRAINAGE REPORT 11. The location of the plat has been located on the soils map. 12. Basin maps have been provided for Shelley Lake 3rd and 2"d Addition. 13.The existing drainage ponds have been located on the basin map. 14. The boundary for Basin D has been adjusted to follow contours. 15. The ponds B, C, and D have the capacity for the 50-year design storm with maximum storage depths exceeding 1.0 ft. The 50-year storm peak flows have been utilized for pipe flows, inlets, and non-flooded width calculations. . 16. There are two ponds from Shelley Lake 3rd Addition that will be removed. The first is temporary pond E. The runoff that was going into this pond will now be directed to pond B. The second pond to be removed is pond CD. The runoff that was going into this pond will now be directed to pond C. The basins have been checked with Shelley Lake 3rd Addition to verify all runoff is accounted for. 17. Basins have not been analyzed for full build-out. The drainage report has been revised to explain which lots have been included. 18. The bowstring sheets have been updated and checked for errors. It has been verified that the correct peak flow has been utilized. 19. Rip Rap calculations have been provided. 20. Peak flow rates have been analyzed for the pipe calculations. GENERAL 21.A draft of the Homeowners Association CC&R's have been provided. 22. A copy of the Fire District Approval letter has been provided. I hope these revisions address all of your concerns. If you have any additional questions or comments please feel free to contact me at 458-6840. Sincerely, CLC ASSOCIATES Doug Desmond, P. E. . Design Engineer DD/skm cc: file Enclosures: 1 copy of the Drainage Report dated 11-26-02 1 bond set of Street and Storm Drainage Plans Sight Distance exhibit and calculations A f , S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGWEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT October 11, 2002 Doug Desmond, P.E. CLC Associates, Inc. W. 707 70'Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 • Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 4"' Addition . Road and Drainage Submittal #1 Doug: We reviewed your September 23, 2002 submittal of the design documents for this project. The following items need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: CONSTRUCTION PLANS: 1. The plans show street name signs construction notes but the plans do not show where they need to be located. 2. The general notes need to refer to the "2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." 3. All drywells need to be within 8 feet of the curb or edge of a maintenance access road. 4. Provide a curb transition detail near Shelley Lake Lane STA 19+00. 5. Show the horizontal sight distance easements in the plans, if necessary. Per the Conditions of Approval, a vertical sight distance analysis is also required. 6. Since the proposed design uses 8 inches of depth for water quality treatment, additional language is required to ensure that Cation Exchange Testing is performed. I am attaching the language that needs to be included with the swale detail in the plans. In addition, verify that the drywell elevations specified in the plan are consistent with the "208" design depth. 7. The pond bottom elevation does not seem appropriate based on the top of curb elevations of the pond inlets. In addition, please provide grading for the ponds to verify that that the adjacent road slopes do not impact the location or size of the ponds. - 8. The plans indicate that the swales will be hydro seeded. Please provide information regarding the irrigation system on the plans. At a minimum, a note needs to be included in the General Construction Notes. 9. Verify that the "208" volume provided reported in the plans and report is consistent with the pond , area and "208" treatment depth. 10. Provide a temporary cul-de-sac at the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 9 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133 h - , DR.A.IIVAGE REPORT: 11. Show the location of the plat on the soils map. 12. Provide a basin map for the adj acent subdivisions. 13. Show the existing drainage facilities in the basin map. 14. It does not appear that the boundaries of Basin D are consistent with the topographic contours. 15. The ponds for Basins B, C, and D do not appear to have the capacity to handle the 50-year storm as required when the basins receive offsite runoff. Verify that the 50-year storm peak flow rates are used in the pipe, inlets, and non-flooded width calculations for these basins. 16. The plans indicate that the temporary pond from Shelley Lake 3d Addition is to be removed. Please clarify how the runoff currently going to this pond will be handled. 17. During our pre-submittal meeting, it was stated that all basins were analyzed assuming full build- out. While this is not required, the basin summary table and drainage report do not appear to indicate a full build-out analysis. Please state the analysis assumptions (i.e. what future lots and streets are expected to drain towards the proposed ponds, etc.) in the drainage report. If the analysis assumes future lots to be developed, the developer needs to keep in mind that changes in the conditions of approval through a time extension request could impact future phases of this - project. In addition, verify that the report is consistent with the information shown in the basin summary table. 18. The Bowstring spreadsheet compares two cases. The first case calculates a flow rate using the entire basin, while the second uses only impervious areas. According to your spreadsheet, the greater of the two is used as the peak flow for the basin. However, as seen in the spreadsheet for basin A, this is not always the case. Please verify for all basins that the correct peak flow rate is selected for the pipe, inlet, and non-flooded width calculations. 19. Provide riprap calculations in the drainage report. 20. Show the peak flow rates in the pipe calculations. GENERAL: 21. Provide a draft of the Homeowner's Association CC&R's. 22. Provide a copy of the Fire District Approval letter. Thank you for your attention to these issues. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager , Gloria M. Mantz, P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning Due to the proposal to utilize 8 inches versus 6 inches of ponded water quality treatment depth between the pond bottom and drywell rim elevation, prior to final certification of these road and drainage facilities, Cation ' Exchange Capacity (CEC) testing will need to be performed according to the procedure as described on page 5-5 of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management. Should the CEC results indicate that the soil is not suitable for stormwater treatment, the design engineer has two options: 1) revise and resubmit the road and drainage plans, indicating that the required pond bottom area (necessary to achieve the required 208 volume based upon a 6 inch depth) is provided; or 2) appropriately amend the top 6 inches of topsoil until CEC testing indicates that the composition of the soil is suitable for stormwater treatment. ENG Forms/Misc Forms/CEC Standard Note.doc . ~ ~~~~'V ~FQ . RECEIVED U12 SEP 2 4 2002 SPOKAiNE ~LJtiT~ ENGIIVEER SppKqidE COtlNri FtJFaN~~R CLC A550CIATE5 September 24, 2002 Gloria Mantz, P.E. Spokane County Engineers 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Shelly Lake 4Ih Addition CLC #020134 Gloria: Enclosed please a set of Erosion and Sedimentation Control plans as well as a Basin Map. Please give me a call if you require any additional information. Sincerely, CLC Associates, Inc. D o u . esmond, P.E. Project Manager DJD/cf Enclosures 4 • ~ J OFRClAl. PUflUC DOCU"AENT SPOKANE COUMY ENGINcEri'S OMCE ; PR AL su~ mm # ~ RETURN TO COUNiY ENGINEER 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE • SUITE 200 • SPOKANE • WA 99204 • P 509 458 6840 • F 509 458 6844 DENVER • SPOKANE • SALT LAKE CITY f ' q - ~ - , ' - S P O K A N E C O U N T Y - DMSION OF ENGINEERING A1VD ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT October 11, 2002 - Doug Desmond, P.E. CLC Associates, Inc. W. 707 70' Avenue, Suite 200 . Spokane, WA 99204 . Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 41h Addition . Road and Drainage Submittal #1 Doug: We reviewed your September 23, 2002 submittal of the design documents for this project. The following items need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: CONSTRUCTION PLANS : 1. The plans show street name signs construction notes but the plans do not show where they need to be located. 2. The general notes need to refer to the "2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." 3. All drywells need to be within 8 feet of the curb or edge of a maintenance access road. 4. Provide a curb transition detail near Shelley Lake Lane STA 19+00. _ 5. - Show the horizontal sight distance easements in the plans, if necessary. Per the Conditions of Approval, a vertical sight distance analysis is also required. 6. Since the proposed design uses 8 inches of depth for water quality treatment, additional language is required to ensure that Cation Exchange Testing is performed. I am attaching the language that needs to be included with the swale detail in the plans. In addition, verify that the drywell elevations specified in the plan are consistent with the "208" design depth. 7. The pond bottom elevation does not seem appropriate based on the top of curb elevarions of the pond inlets. In addition, please provide grading for the ponds to verify that that the adjacent road slopes do not impact the Iocation or size of the ponds. 8. The plans indicate that the swales will be hydro seeded. Please provide information regarding the irrigation system on the plans. At a minimum, a note needs to be included in the General Construction Notes. 9. Verify that the "208" volume provided reported in the plans and report is consistent with the pond area and "208" treatment depth. 10. Provide a temporary cul-de-sac at the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane. 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 9 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 . • DRAJNAGE REPORT: 11. Show the location of the plat on the soils map. 12. Provide a basin map for the adjacent subdivisions. . 13. Show the existing drainage facilities in the basin map. 14. It does not appear that the boundaries of Basin D are consistent with the topographiccontours. 15. The ponds for Basins B, C, and D do not appear to have the capacity to handle the 50-year storm as required when the basins receive offsite runoff: Verify that the 50-year storm peak flow rates are used in the pipe, inlets, and non-flooded width calculations for these basins. 16. The plans indicate that the temporary pond from Shelley Lake 3rd Addition is to be removed. Please clarify how the runoff currently going to this pond will be handled. 17. During our pre-submittal meeting, it was stated that all basins were analyzed assuming -full build- out. While this is not required, the basin summary table and drainage report do not appear to indicate a full build-out analysis. Please state the analysis assumptions (i.e. what future lots and streets are expected to drain towards the proposed ponds, etc.) in the drainage report. If the analysis assumes future lots to be developed, the developer needs to keep in mind that changes in the conditions of approval through a time extension request could impact future phases of this project. In addition, verify that the report is consistent with the information shown in the basin summary table. 18. The Bowstring spreadsheet compares two cases. The first case calculates a flow rate using the entire basin, while the second uses only impervious areas. According to your spreadsheet, the greater of the two is used as the peak flow for the basin. However, as seen in the spreadsheet for basin A, this is not always the case. Please verify for all basins that the correct peak flow rate is selected for the pipe, inlet, and non-flooded width calculations. 19. Provide riprap calculations in the drainage report. 20. Show the peak flow rates in the pipe calculations. GENERAL: 21. Provide a draft of the Homeowner's Association CC&R's. 22. Provide a copy of the Fire District Approval letter. Thank you for your attention to these issues. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Developrnent Services Engineer/Manager ..s~ Gloria M. Mantz, P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning Project file . , Due to the proposal to utilize 8 inches versus 6 inches of ponded water quality treatment depth between the pond bottom and drywell rim elevation, prior to final certification of these road and drainage facilities, Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) testing wi11 need to be performed according to the procedure as described on page 5-5 of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management: Should the CEC results indicate that the soil is not suitable for stormwater treatment, the design engineer has two options: 1) revise and resubmit the road and drainage plans, indicating that the required pond bottom area (necessary to achieve the required 208 volume based upon a 6 inch -depth) is provided; or '2) appropriately amend the top 6 inches of topsoil until CEC testing indicates that the composition of the soil is suitable for stormwater treatment. ENG Forms/Misc Forms/CEC Standard Note.doc . ~evj -evv l /ZI/03 January 13, 2002 Doug Desmond, P.E. CLC Associates, Inc. W. 707 7`" Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 4`h Addition Road and Drainage Submittal #2 Doug: We reviewed your January 6, 2002 submittal of the design documents for this project. The comments below are a follow up to the comments addressed with our October 11, 2002 letter or based upon the changes to the current submittal and need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: 1. The ponds for Basins B and D receive offsite runoff and therefore, are required to have the capacity to handle the 50-year storm. It appears that these ponds have the capacity for the 50-year storm when the 1' depth is exceeded. This is acceptable if fencing is provided for the ponds. CYL 2. The peak flow rates used in the pipe, inlet,. and flooded width calculations do not appear to be consistent with the peak flow rates shown in the Bowstring calculations. 1n addition, clarify the extent of sub-basins C 1, C2, C 1 A and C2A. 3. The pipe calculations indicate that some pipe velocities are below the 4 fps requirement. -pYI- 4. It appears that the curb inlet for Pond B does not have the capacity to handle the design flow. Please verify that all inlets have the proper capacity. In addition, check that the cross-slope used in the calculations is consistent with the proposed road cross-slopes. DYI, 5. The size of the proposed riprap pad is not consistent with the riprap calculations. 0~ 6. Provide a draft of the Homeowner's Association CC&R's. &V- Thank you for your attention to these issues. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. ~ (6-LJ a Sincerely, ~ & r l John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager p.~~ ~ . Gloria M. Mantz, P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning Project file Q~ • October 11, 2002 ~ ♦ . / Doug Desmond, P.E. CLC Associates, Inc. Q W. 707 7`hAvenue, Suite 200 ~ SPokane, WA 99204 ~ . Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 4"' Addition Road and Drainage Submittal #1 Doug: We reviewed your September 23, 2002 submittal of the design documeirts for tlvs project. The following items need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: CONSTRUCTION PLANS: 1. The plans show street name signs construction notes but the plans do not show where they need to be located. 2. The general notes need to refer to the "2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." O K 3. All drywells need to be within 8 feet of the curb or edge of a maintenance access road. 4. Provide a curb transition detail near Shelley Lake Lane STA 19+00. 01". 5. Show the horizontal sight distance easements in the plans, if necessary. Per the Conditions of Approval, a vertical sight distance analysis is also required. p V< 6. Since the proposed design uses 8 inches of depth for water quality treatment, additional language is required to ensure that Cation Exchange Testing is performed. I am attaching the language that needs to be included with the swale detail in the plans. In addition, verify thw the drywell elevations specified in the plan are. consistent with the "208" design depth. a K 7. The pond bottom elevation does not seem appropriate based on the top of curb elevations of the pond inlets. In addition, please provide grading for the ponds to verify that that the adjacent road slopes do not impact the location or size of the ponds. ()rK 8. The plans indicate that the swales will be hydro seeded. Please provide information regarding the irrigation - system on the p~lans. At a minimum, a note needs to be included in the General Construction Notes. o 9. Verify that the "208" volume provided reported in the plans and report is consistent with the pond area and "208" treatrnent depth. Ov< 10. Provide a temporary cul-de-sac at the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane. r . ; DRAINAGE REPORT: 11. Show the location of the plat on the soils map. ~ 12. Provide a basin map for the adjacent subrlivisions. • ./t 13. Show the existing drainage facilities in the basin map. 14. It does not appear that the boundaries of Basin D are consistent with the topographic contours. 15. The ponds for Basins B, C, aad D do not appear to have the capacity to handle the 50-year storm as required when the basins receive offsite runoff. Verify that the 50-year storm peak flow rates are used in the pipe, inlets, and non-flooded width calculations for these basins. 4Lk 16. The plans indicate that the temporary pond from Shelley Lake 3rd Addition is to be e. Please clarify how the runoff cunently going to this pond will be handled. a(-<, 17. During our pre-submittal meeting, it was stated that a11 basins were analyzed assuming full build- out. While this is not required, the basin summary ta.ble and drainage report do not appear to indica.te a full build-out analysis, Please state the analysis assumptions (i.e. what fitture lots and streets are expected to dra.in towards the proposed ponds, etc.) in the drainage report. If the analysis assumes future lots to be developed, the developer needs to keep in mind that changes in the conditions of approval through a ti.me extension request could impact future phases of this project. In addition, verify that the report is consistent with the information shown in the basin summary table. 6V\ 18. The Bowstring spreadsheet compares two cases. The first case calculates a flow rate using the entire basin, while the second uses only impervious areas. According to your spreadsheet, the greater of the two is used as the peak flow for the basin. However, as seen in the spreadsheet for basin A, this is not always the case. Please verify for all basins that the cornect peak flow rate is selected for the pipe, inlet, and non-flooded width calculations. o V_ 19. Provide ripra.p calculations in the dra.inage report. 20. Show the peak flow rates in the pipe calculations. GENERAL: 21. Provide a draft of the Homeowner's Association CC&R's. 22. Provide a copy of the Fire District Approvalletter. 0 K Thank you for your attention to these issues. If you have any questions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager Gloria M. Mantz, P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning Project file '~►~~•~••••~!~~iii~i~iiri~~ ; _ s~ y ~Z - - - ~ - - - - - ~ r'~-.. - - Ci - - q-2-0 s - - CI A- - ~•23-- ~F_s - - l,SY ~fr- - - C Z - - 3 u - ~ F S - - , i Z- - ` - - - ~C2_A" , - - - - - - - - - L ' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ --~Y~-l-- ~~f' ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /~B,►~, _ _ _ _ _ u?~ d,-1'~ - ~I O - ~ _ - - - - - - Y- ~ a C l 3.0 1 ~ CZ 3.5q ~ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . _ t ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - 2 .LI y-- - - - G Z- • ~ ! - - - _ _ - - - c~~ aL+ ~ ~ Z ~ 3 - - - - - - ~ , , - - - - - _ - - - - - - ~ _ ; - - - - - - f - - - - - - - - - ~ , - - - - - - - 1 1 , ~ . ~ • - , S P O K A N E C O U N Y I T , . ~ DMSdON OF ENGWEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN'f . OPY October 11, 2002 Doug Desmond, P.E. . CLC Associates, Inc. W. 707 7h Avenue, Suite 200 . Spokane, WA 99204 Subject: P1750D - Shelley Lake 4~' Addition . Road and Drainage Submittal #1 Doug: . . . We reviewed your September 23, 2002 submittal of the design documents for this project. The following items need to be addressed or resolved prior to acceptance of the plans: CONSTRUCTION PLANS : 1. The plans show street name signs construction notes but the plans do not show where they need to be located. - 2. The general notes need to refer to the "2001 Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction." 3. All drywells need to be within 8 feet of the curb or edge of a maintenance access road. 4. Provide a curb transition detail near Shelley Lake Lane STA 19+00. - 5. Show the horizontal sight distance easements in the plans, if necessary. Per the Conditions of Approval, a vertical sight distance analysis is also required. 6. Since the proposed design uses 8 inches of depth for water quality treahnent, additional language is required to enswre that Cation Exchange Testing is performed. I am attaching the language that needs to be included with the swale detail in the plans. In addition, verify that the drywell elevations specified in the plan are consistent with the "208" design depth. 7. The pond bottom elevation does not seem appropriate based on the top of curb elevations of the pond inlets. In addition, please provide grading for the ponds to verify that that the adjacent road slopes do not impact the location or size of the ponds. 8. 1'he plans indicate that the swales will be hydro seeded. Please provide information regarding the irrigation system on the plans. At a minimum, a note needs to be included in the General Construction Notes. 9. Verify that the "208" volume provided reported in the plans and report is consistent with the pond area and "208" treatment depth. 10. Provide a temporary cul-de-sac at the terminus of Shelley Lake Lane. 1026 W. Braadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 9 (509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133 N • • DRAINAGE REPORT: ~ 11. Show the location of the plat on the soils map. , . 12. Provide a basin map for the adj acent subdivisions. • , 13. Show the existing drainage facilities in the basin map. 14. It does not appear that the boundaries of Basin D are consistent with the topographic contours. 15. The ponds for Basins B, C, and D do not appear to have the capacity to handle the 50-year storm as required when the basins receive offsite runoff: Verify that the 50-year storm peak flow rates are used in the pipe, inlets, and non-flooded width calculations for these basins. 16. The plans indicate that the temporary pond from Shelley Lake 3d Addition is to be removed. Please clarify how the runoff currently going to this pond will be handled. 17. During our pre-submittal meeting, it was stated that all basins were analyzed assuming •full build- out. While this is not required, the basin summary table and drainage report do not appear to indicate a full build-out analysis. Please state the analysis assumptions (i.e. what future lots and . sfireets are expected to drain towards the proposed ponds, etc.) in the drainage report. If the analysis assumes future lots to be developed, the developer needs to keep in mind that changes in the conditions of approval through a time extension request could impact future phases of this project. In addition, verify that the report is consistent with the information shown in the basin summary table. 18. The Bowstring spreadsheet compares fwo cases. The first case calculates a flow rate using the entire basin, while the second uses only impervious areas. According to your spreadsheet, the greater of the two is used as the peak flow for the basin. However, as seen in the spreadsheet for basin A, this is not always the case. Please verify for all basins that the correct peak flow rate is selected for the pipe, inlet, and non-flooded width calculations. 19. Provide riprap calculations in the drainage report. 20. Show the peak flow rates in the pipe calculations. . GENERAL: 21. Provide a draft of the Homeowner's Association CC&R's. 22. Provide a copy of the Fire District Approval letter. Thank you for your attention to these issues. If you have any quesrions about this review, please contact Gloria Mantz at 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager ' ! ~ ~Gt at v Gloria M. Mantz, P.E. Plan Review Engineer . cc: Robert Heitman- project applicant Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning Project file 4 •i PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST PROJECT ~ O REVIEW I DATE: Q Za/a~' PROJECT NAME: S~ L&U 4*1 Prdd 1~ Qh PROJECT ENGINEER: 006* Do0l"Onoi . PROJECT APPLIC~IT: BvOer ~le I ~R h+ COUNTY REVIEWER: 64"44 COUNTY STANDARDS (circle one): 1981 1995 1999 (ZLO1 Road Standards (RS), Guidelines for Stormwater Management (GSM), Standard Plan (SP). ADNIINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS YesN§No❑N/A❑ 1. A signed fee agreement is in the file. ves❑no0•r/n❑ 2. A completed Submittal Checklist has been included with the road and drainage plan subnuttal. YeS❑rroMA❑ 3. The project is located outside the Aquifer Sensitive Area. ve5 o~N/A❑ 4. The plat lies outside designated 100-year Flood Plain Area. va ,vo❑N/A❑ 5. The project is located outside of an identified Stormwater Management Problem Area. Yes ❑ o❑N/A~ 6. Any design deviations are approved. v~ ~vo❑N/A❑ 7. Locate the Findings and Order for the project and read the Conditions. ves0No❑N/A❑ 8. Copy road design element table from Pre-design Meeting Notes and attach. Yes%'o❑N/n❑ 9. A site visit was performed. Date: 101k/V 2. PLAN REQUIREMENTS (RS, Sec. 5.04) i/ ✓ ✓ Yes;avo❑N/n❑ 1. First plan sheet has a project title, a vicinity map, an index of plan sheets and the engineer's certification statement. YeSDYo❑N/A❑ 2. The plans are signed by the developer. val%'oON/n❑ 3. The plans are stamped, signed and dated by a Washington P.E. Yes❑nro❑.-VA❑ 4. Road alignment includes 100 ft stationing; stations increase west to east and south to nortti; station equations shown. Yes oUN/n❑ 5. Section, Township and Range are provided. Yes o❑n/n❑ 6. Bearings on the road centerline are provided. v.ro11nJ❑ 7. Curve data (radius, delta, arc length and semi-tangent) is shown for all road centerlines and curb returns. Yes KoOn/n❑ 8. Existing utilities are shown on the plans. Ves vo❑NIn❑ 9. Proposed utilities are shown on the plans. ves no❑N/A❑ 10. Intersecting and adjacent roads are identified and shown, as are any adjacent subdivisions. vq No❑NA❑ 11. North arrow and scale (min linch = 50 ft; = 100 ft OK for large lots; = 20 ft for cluttered plan) are shown. Yes'ONoON/A❑ 12. A benchmark is called out on the plans (RS, Sec 5.06). Yes NoOMa❑ 13. Title Block to include: project name, sheet number, road name and road limits (by station). ves No❑N!A❑ 14. Section and lot lines are shown on the plans. ve-11No0n/n❑ 15. The Standard Plan Notes & symbols are included on the plans. Yes~4•4o11 NIA11 16. Existing and finish contours are shown on road plans. ENG All Forms & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Aage 1 of 9 Rcvised: 02128/02 ves U.40MADNEW STREETS Y No❑n/n❑ 1. The plans show a typical road cross-section (RS, Sect. 5.08). ~ ,re~rroOn/A❑ a. If yes, cross-section shows: Existing R/W, proposed R/W, proposed width, future setaside, edge of pavemen~ curbs, sidewalks, swales, and any other requu-ed improvements (RS, Sect. 3.03 and 5.08). Ye NoDNIn❑ b. Yyes, cross-section on the plans shows the cross slope between 2% to 4.5% (SP A-1 for 2% min). Yes voON/a❑ c. If yes, the cross-slope is correct when checked on the profile drawings. vts o0N1r1❑ 2. The proposed new width matches the width required in the Conditions and Road Standards (Table 3.01 and 3.03). vfs&o[]N/A❑ 3. Centerline grades are within minimum and maximum (RS, Sec 5.06,5 & Tables 3.02 & 3.03). vesivoDN/A❑ 4. Vertical curve lengths are adequate (use spreadsheet) (RS Table 3.01 & 3.03). v.IvoON,A❑ 5. Horizontal curve radius values are adequate (RS Table 3.01 & 3.03). Y. No❑N/A❑ 6. The curb type is Type B for public roads and Type R for private (SP A-1) Y.o❑wa❑ 7. The curb grades are _ 0.5% and 8% for Public and 5 12% for Private Roads (RS, Table 3.03). vesONo❑N/A❑ a. If no, there is an approved design deviation in the file. vesOxo❑N/A❑ 8. Soil borings have been taken and soil has been classified as per USC system. vcs[]nol]N/A❑ a. County matrix in Road Standards was utilized for pavement section design (RS Table 3.16). vcs❑Nal]N/a❑ b. Pavement design method and proposed section(s) are adequate (RS, Sect. 5.08, 4). vtsl:]No❑.rIA❑ 9. Maximum number of units from single roadway meets standards (RS, Sect. 1.03). Yes❑\00N/A❑ CURB RETURNS vesikNoON/A❑ 1. BCR, MCR, and ECR stations/elevations on curb returns are shown in the plan view (RS, Sect. 5.04,21). v.~noONA❑ 2. Curb return radius values are adequate (RS, Sect. 3.04). ves ~oO~v~A❑ INTERSECTYONS Ye ~oONA] 1. Intersection separation is _ 150' on local access and Collectors and 300' on arterials (RS, Sect. 3.04). Ye~ro~N/A❑ 2. The intersecrions meet the landing requirements (2% 1995 Stds; 2% downgrade/4% upgrade 1999/2001 Stds) (RS, Sect. 3.04). veSONo❑•rX 3. Wheelchair ramps are provided at intersections with sidewalks (RS, Sect. 3.20). V4 siA&APJO►k Yes❑n,'.K'/A❑ 4. Sight distance is addressed for each intersection; analysis (plan and profile) is provided where appropriate (RS, Table 3.01). , v«ONoE]N/A CUL-DE-SACS YesONo❑N/A 1. Tbe center of cul-de-sac station is shown (RS, Sect. 3.04, could be interpreted as SI). vesOrraON/A 2. Tbe cul-de-sac curb is shown in profle (RS, Sect. 5.06). ' Yes❑No❑N/A 3. The cul-de-sac radius is 45'/50' diameter (RS, Sect. 3.17 and SP A-10). vesOno❑N/A 4. The cul-de-sac grades (top of curb) are 1% minimum (SP A-10). . ves❑no❑rri,%❑ TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE PLAN YesONo❑N1A❑ 1. Street name signs are shown at all intersections (RS, Sect. 3.12 & 5.04,11). YeSOrr N,a❑ 2. StoP si~s are shown for all streets that intersect an arterial (RS, Sect. 3.12), M~tSIh~ a L~ /A+t% ~N.Q. C~l~w~'C Yes❑No N/n❑ 3. Barriers are shown at the end of dead end streets (when necessary) (RS, Sect. 3.14). Yes❑rro❑N/A❑ 4. Special signing issues are addressed. (Check with the County Traffic Engineer) (RS, Sect. 3.12). ENG All Forms & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 2 of 9 Revised: 02/28/02 ves❑NoOn/A CHANNELIZATION PLAN Yes❑rro❑N/A 1. A striping and/or channelization plan has been submitted (RS, Sect. 3.12). ves❑NoONia 2. Channelization Plan has been reviewed and OK'd by Bob Brueggeman in Traffic Engineering. Yes❑No❑rin STREET WIDElVING ves❑rro❑N/A 1. A street cross-section is shown for widening existing streets (RS, Sect. 5.08). veS❑No❑N/a a. If yes, cross-section shows: Existing R/W, proposed R/W, proposed width, future setaside, edge of pavement, curbs, sidewalks, swales, and any other required improvements (RS, Sect. 3.03 and 5.08). Yes EINo❑rIA 3. The proposed new width matches the width required in the Conditions and Road Standards (Table 3.01 and 3.03). ~ veSEINo❑rvn 4. The curb type is Type B for public roads and Type R for private (RS, Table 3.03). Yes❑rro❑N,n 5. Curb section cross slope is between 2% and 4.5% (SP A-1 for 2% min). veSOINo❑N/A 6. Curb grades are _ 0.5% (RS, Table 3.03).. ves0kN'o❑N/A 7. Length of pavement taper out of project = WS2=60 for S 40 mph; WS for > 45 mph (AASHTO). ve9❑IN'o❑N/A 8. Transition from end of curb to existing paving is shown (curb should nose down in 12") (AASHTO). vesONoEIN/A 9. 100' (min.) pavement taper into project is shown (AASHTO) (consider R/W). Yes❑N`o❑N/A 10. Widening spreadsheet has been provided; new cross-slopes and gutter grade are appropriate (AASHTO). Yes[IINo❑N/A DITCHES YesO~ol]N/A 1. Ditches are identified in plans, details provided, and have a minimum gade of 0.5% (GSM Page 4-14). Yes[]no❑N/A 2. Profiles and cross-sections are shown on the plans for all proposed channels and ditches (GSM Page 4-27). vcs❑no❑NIA 3. Ditches with eroding velocities have lining for erosion protection (GSM Page 4-14). Yes❑NoON/n 4. Min. Freeboard = 0.33*Flow Depth (GSM Page 4-28). 11MAJ 4. Man-made ditches are not located within residential lots (GSM Page 1-5). ves❑noOyiA❑ CULVERTS AND PiPE SYSTEMS Yes •o❑v/n❑ 1. All culverts and pipes are shown in profile (types, stations, offsets, lengths, and inverts) (GSM Page 2-1 & RS Sect. 5.06). Yes ~o❑Nia❑ 2. All pipes are _ 12' ; 10" is allowed between catch basins or drywells, if the length < 44 LF (GSM Page 4-4). Yes ro❑Nin❑ 3. The minimum culvert and pipe slope shown is 0.5% (GSM Page 4-4). Nes)qNo❑x/A ❑ 4. There is > 12" of cover for all culverts / storm sewer pipes {2.5' (PVC), 1.5' (CMP), 1'(RCP) (HDPE/ADS)} (GSM Page 4- 3) Yea0no0./A 5. The culverts are stationed from centerline stationing (GSM Page 2-1). vey❑no06. Pipe anchors are shown for pipe grades >20% (GSM Page 4-27). Yes ~oOKin❑ 7. Energy dissipation is provided (i.e. riprap around culvert outlet). ves °o❑N/A❑ 8. All angle points in thc pipe system have suitable access such as a catchbasin for cleaning (GSM Page 4-4). ve90Nol:]N/Alp 9. All pipes are located a minimum of 5 feet from a rear or side property linc (GSM Pagc 4-4). Yesllo~,v/n❑ 10. When two different sizes of pipes are joined at the same manhole, the 0.8 rule is applied (GSM Page 4-4). vesOvoONin0 11. Trash Racks are provided when pipe diameter _ 18" in urban areas (GSM Page 4-27). Yes❑No❑N/A❑ RIP RAP ves[].ro❑N,A❑ 1. Material gradation, rip rap thickness and area are specified (GSM Page 4-29) ves0NoON/A❑ 2. The minimum thickness of the rip rap laycr is or whichever is greater of 12", D,oo or 1.5D50 (GSM Page 4-29). ves❑rro❑N/A❑ 3. The gravel/sand filter conforms with Table 4-15 (GSM Page 4-15). ENG All Forms & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 3 of 9 Revised: 02/28/02 YegDvo❑N/A❑ INLETS Yes❑YoONin❑ l. T'he centerline road stations, offscts, and invert elevations for all inlets are shown in the plan views (GSM Page 2-1). vt9ONoON/A❑ 2. Inlet grate type is shown (GSM Page 2-1). ves❑NoON/A❑ 3. Catch basin, inlet, or special manhole details are shown or a standard drawing is referenced (GSM Page 2-1). ves❑INoONin❑ 4. Trash Racks are provided when pipe diameter _ 18" in urban areas and _ 12" in rural areas (GSM Page 4-27). veS❑noO.trn❑ 208 SWALE & DRYWELL SYSTEMS v~~vo0tvIn❑ 1. The swale is located outside a future set aside area (GSM Page 5-18).. YeslANo❑NiA❑ 2. Swalc floor and berm elevation is shown on the drawing (GSM Page 5-18). v~ No❑•rtn❑ 3. Dimensions are sbown for bottom of swale (GSM Page 5-18). ,r~ o❑N/n❑ 4. Stationing and offsets are provided for each pond corner (GSM Page 5-18). vesOrro,A'/n❑ 5. Swale floor is 6" below drywell grate elevation (8" if soil mixture is specified or CEC testing requirement is noted) (GSM Page 5-18). Q4(GS~%OvJ hw+ drywell5 QrC 611 YesOrro ~a❑ 6. Sodltur~drosee and ~rinkfer svstem ss ecified for publicly maintained ponds (GSM Page 4-20). vesOrro /A❑ 7. ~I'~e total stora e de th is 1' for GPA with drywells and _ 0.5' for GPA with no drywells (GSI1~I Page 5-18). vE5Ox Ia❑ 8. Dryland grasseecif'~ieYfor ponds maintained by homeowner's associarions (GSM Page 4-20). vIXIo0►v/a❑ 9. Swale side slopes do not exceed a 3:1 side slope. (2:1 side slope is allowed if swale depth is <12") (GSM Page 5-18) Yes❑No❑N/A❑ 10. Swale floor > 6" below normal gutter flowline at curb inlet without drywell; > 12" with drywell (GSM Page 5-18). vesoNo❑N/A❑ 11. Swale must have 3" freeboard above the max. water surface elevation for the dcsign storm (GSM Figure 48). ves❑No N/A❑ 12. A cross-section of the pond is shown (GSM Page 3-5). vesOvo N/A ❑ 13. A grading plan has been provided for the pond; at a minimum, finish contours have been provided (GSM Page 3-5). v~❑ro~N/A~ 14. A 6 ft visible through fence is provided if the swale is deep, sideslopes exceed 5:1 and cannot drain in 72 hrs (GSM Page 3-5). vesONo❑x/A❑ 15. Overflow from a swale at a low point is directed away from structures (GSM Page 2-1). ves o❑N/n❑ 16. Drywell type is specified (GSM Page 2-1). Yes NXIN/A❑ 17. Drywell grate type is specified (GSM Page 2-1). YNo~N~n~ 18. Drywell should be~o'ffse"t fro ~ thecur,~b.',~y~ ,n~~l~. .'Fj•-1'Et v~ ~~~ro❑~ r~n0 19. M~ulti~,1- dr el,ls~are~lo~cate`d.,,~mor~e,than%~30'~`.a`-~ari~=cen'fer~to~cenfer. _ -~~.-P~ -,~Y`~`.~- . , a . p: . AO i►►O ve.Svo N/A❑ 20. Drywell is located within S' pf the curb line, or a maintenance access route and easement are provided (GSM Page 1-4). Yes❑No ,n❑ 21. A 12' maintenance access drive to the bottom of pond is provided, if necessary (GS1V1 Page 1-3). YesONo11N/n❑ a. If yes, an all-weather surface (6 in gravel), min 12 ft. wide, min 20 ft. easement or tract, with < 20% slope. Yes❑Nol--]N/n❑ 22. Bottom of drywell has a 4 ft minimum clearance from any limiting layer (ie, bedrock, clay, or high groundwater) (GSM Page 4-26). veSM'o0N/A0 23. Min. berm elevation is specified (GSM Page 5-18). ves❑ro0Nin DETENTION POND YC9❑No0N/A 1. The pond bottor~nd berm elevation is shown on the drawing (GSM Page 5-18). Yes❑,,o❑;v/n 2. Dimensions are shown for the pond bottom (GSM Page 5-18). Yes01ro10JN1A 3. Starioning and offsets are provided for each pond corner (GSM Page 5-18). YesOro❑v/A 4. Sod/turf/hydroseed and sprinkler system is specified for publicly maintained ponds (GSIVI Page 4-20). ves11no101v/a 5. Dryland grasses specified for ponds maintained by homeowner's associations (GSM Page 4-20). Yes❑No0nuA 6. Pond side slopes do not exceed a 3:1 (GSM Page 5-18). Yes❑roOrrIn 7. A cross-section of the pond is shown (GSM Page 3-5). YesONoEIvIA 8. A grading plan has been provided for the pond; at a minimum, finish contours have been provided (GSM Page 3-5). Yes❑no❑N/A 9. A 12' maintenance access drive to the bottom of pond is provided, if necessary (GSM Page 1-3). ENG All Forms & Progams/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 4 of 9 Revised: 02/28/02 vesoNa❑r,/n a. If yes, an all-weather surface (6 in gravel), min 12 ft. wide, min 20 ft. easement or tract, with < 20% slope. Yes ❑No11 N/a 10. A 6 ft visible through fence is provided if the swale is > 1' deep and sideslopes exceed S: I and cannot drain in 72 hours (GSM Page 3-5). Yes ❑xoON/A 11. Berm height is greater than 4 ft in height (GSM Page 4-30). ves❑No❑N/A If yes, design includes a keyway, clay or geotextile liner and is in accordance with Fig 47 of SW Guidelines. ves❑NoDN/A 12. Berm heigbt is greater than 12 ft in height (GSM Page 4-30). va[]NoON/A a. If yes, geotechnical report and subsurface investigation has been prepared and submitted for review. YesOrro❑N/A❑ EVAPORATIVE POND Yes❑;vo❑NIn 1. A cross-section of the evaporative pond is shown (GSM Page 3-5). Yes❑.o❑N/A 2. The pond bottom and berm elevation is shown on the drawing (GSM Page 5-18). ves0.o❑N/A 3. Dimensions are shown for the pond bottom (GSM Page 5-18). YesOvo❑N/a 4. Stationing and offsets are provided for each pond corner (GSM Page 5-18). Yes0No0•r/A 5. A grading plan has been provided for the pond; at a minimum, finish contours have been provided (GSM Page 3-5). vCs❑NoO,wA 6. Sod/turf/hydroseed and sprinkler system is specified for publicly maintained ponds (GSM Page 4-20). ves❑rro❑tN'/A 7. Impermeable liner of compacted clay, bentonite soil mix, or plastic, with seepage rate <_1 x10-7 cm/s (GSM Page 3- 5). ve-SoNo❑nvn 8. Dryland grasses specified for ponds maintained by homeowner's associations (GSM Page 4-20). Yes❑NoDN/A 9. Berm height is greater than 4 ft in height (GSM Page 4-30). ves0No11 N/A If yes, design includes a keyway, clay or geotexrile liner and is in accordance with Fig 47 of SW Guidelines. vesOrro❑N/a 10. Berm height is greater than 12 ft in height (GSM Page 4-30). Yes[],va0rrIA a. If yes, geotechnical report and subsurface invesrigation has been prepared and submitted for review. vesONoONia 11. A 12' maintenance access drive to the bottom of ponds is provided, if necessary (GSVI Page 1-3). YesONoOrr/a a. If yes, an all-weather surface (6 in gravel), min 12 ft. wide, min 20 ft. easement or tract, with < 20% slope. ves ❑No❑rr/a 12. A 6 ft visible through fence is provided if the swale is > 1' deep and sideslopes exceed 5:1 (GSM Page 4-20). Yes ❑rro❑NI 13. At least 6" of top soil over the liner is included (GSM Page 3-5). ves❑No❑ n❑ EASEMENTS h0 UIm v~ONo Ja❑ 1. All drainage facilities have adequate drainage easements for maintenance (GSM Page 1-5). a ves❑No❑jN/n S /A 2. A min. 5' easement is provided for 208 swales (GSM Page 5-18). '~Atk Y~ONo❑Nl a 3. There are existing or proposed easements for natural channels (GSM Page 1-5). Y~❑No❑run 4. Easements for natural channels are adequate to pass the 50-year storm plus a 30%(GSM Page 1-5). ~a vaONo❑x 5. A public drainage easement is provided where public street drainage is diverted onto private property (GSM Page 1-5). v~❑No❑N 6. Overflow easements are provided from swales/ponds located in low points, ~vhere necessary and possible (GSM Page 2- 1). v~0No~wn❑7. Sight distance easements are identified. Yes[]rro❑NIn❑ EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS Y o❑N,n❑ 1. The basic elements are on the plan (silt fence, rock construcrion entry, checkdams, etc.) (GSM App. K Page 30). v to❑N/n❑ 2. Standard Notes have been included (GSM Appendix B) Y~'ivo❑x/n❑ 3. The ESC plan includes the information listed in Section 4.5.20 (GSM Page 4-33) ENG All Forms & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 5 of 9 Revised: 02/28/02 REPORT REQUIREMENTS veS❑NollN/A❑ 1. The calculations are stamped, signed and dated by a Washington P.E (GSM Page 2-3). YC511no❑N/A0 2. A SCS soils map is included (GSM Page 4-15). ves 0ra11 N/A❑ 3. The pcrpctual maintenance of drainage systems is provided for (GSM Page 1-3). v~,~ ~ ~ r,~a~~4~. ~~Ttie~ce~deve'lo~ ed~`GN~value mafelie`s=flierreceni;land4use=: a`a4sturelran'°e = azed`-b~ 'livestock~. a'`"?'eul;iures>-~farm~"`'eda . .P R ~a - - S,_ Y ~ YeS❑no❑N/A❑ ROADS ves[]roON/A❑ 1. Gutter flow depth and non-flooded road width evaluated for compliance (see GSM Figure 37, Page 6-70). veS0,voON/A❑ 2. A site distance analysis has been provided for each intersection (RS Table 3.01 and 3.03). YeS❑roaN/A❑ a. A sight distance easement has been provided for encroachment >2 ft. vCS0ro0rriA11 BASIN MAPS (GSM Page 2-3) vesOr1%1A❑ 1. A pre-developed basin map is provided. ve irsolIN/All 2. A post-developed basin map is provided. v~ o❑N/A❑ 3. North arrow and scale are shown. Y~ roON/A❑ 4. Sub-basins are labeled and correlate with calculations. vo~N/A❑ 5. Contours/spot clevations are shown. Y~ o❑NAI 6. Labeled Tc routes are sho«n. vcs❑No❑r/Ao 7. Existing drainagE courses are shown. Yes❑r,o❑mAo 8. Proposed drainage courses are shown. Yu%NoON/A❑ 9. The drainage design maintains existing sheet flow patterns without concentrating flows. veSXNo❑n/n❑ 10. The centerline of all ditches and the direction of flow are shoNvn (Page 2-3 and 4-28). ves❑No)qN/A❑ 11. Existing drainage facilities and water bodies are shown. Yes K.11N/A❑ 12. Footprint of proposed drainage facilities are shown. Yes❑No❑N/All BASINS Yevo❑N/n❑ 1. Hydrologic calculations are provided for each basin. (Rational Formula if _ 10 acres, SCS TR-55 if area > 10 acres) (GSM Page 3-5). ves❑ X/A0 2. On-site = 10 year design storm and off-site = 50 year design storm (GSM Page 3-1). Ye voO,vJ❑ 3. Runoff rate is compared between entire basin and road area; larger rate controls (GSM Page 3-1). YesaNo❑N/A❑ DITCHES veS❑NoOn/nF( 1. Ditch calculations have been provided (50 year storm, plus 30% freeboard) (GSM Page 1-5). YesIKo❑N/A❑ CULVERTS AND PIPE SYSTEMS vesWNo❑wn❑ 1. Backwater analysis for any pipe and/or ditch is included (GSM Page 4-26). YeSONo❑rX 2. Headwater calculations for culverts are provided (GSM Page 4-27). ves❑No❑N/AX 3. The headwater for culvert entrances is under 20 for <18" in ~ and 1.5 ~ for culverts greater than 18" in ves❑no❑N/A❑ 4. The minimum velocity within each pipe of the pipe system is 4 fps (GSM Page 4-3). vesOrol:]N/A❑ 5. There is a minimum freeboard of 0.75 feet in each catchbasin and top of grate (GSM Page 4-3). YesONXIN/A❑ 6. Riprap design calculations are provided (GSM Page 4-29). ENG All Forms & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 6 of 9 Revised: 02128/02 YesEINa❑NIA❑ riVLETS Y~aa❑MA ❑ l. Curh inlet capacity calcutatians are I ncluded (GS IVi Page 4-1}. YVNNAX.a0 2, Ferimeter calculatian does not include the side of the graTe agaiiist the curb face (GSM Page 4-1). ~ESOC~flNrA❑ 3. Peiimeter af graie is = 2 for calculations where there is na curb apening (GSM Page 4-1 yu ~i~O❑~r~,O ~l. Curb inlet let7gth ds~es r~at exceed 6 feet (C~SNI Fage 5-19). ~(t~ki 0 •5 ive ~ ,reS❑Na❑Nfn❑ 208 SWALE & DRYWCLL SYSTEMS %in V.g Nb❑rvra❑ l. Suils type is "pre-apprnved" for dr}+wells rarithout percvlation tests (see page 4-15, GSiVl). ves EaDNrn❑ a. If no, a geotechnic-al report is included and recomrnendations are accaunted far. YJANaQNAI 2. Swale area is required area ftorn `20$' calculations fOr impervious areas (GSiVl'Page 5-1). v~R ivo11,NfA ❑ 3. 208 swale flQor area, vfl]ume requirements sized prapcrly to treat impervious surface sreas (GSM Page 5-1), res❑NoEINf DETENTIQN POND ,re1❑1a0~r.~ 1. Contains the di~f'erence betvveen t~te 50-yr develvped and the 50-year pre-d~veloped (C'xS1Vi Page 3-5)- lr~❑r~o0€~rn 2. Releases at 50-YT Pre-developed ([~S~VI Page 4e20). vt.5❑~0O~,r~, 3. Control stxucture is designed ta release rates speci~"ied in the Cs~nditions (GSM Fage 4-15). vfiS❑~vn❑~vr.~ 4. I~ownstream channel car pipe system can handle groposed fla~ws (GSPvI, Fage 3 r~❑vo~~r,,~ 5 . Emergency ov~erf]ov~r u~eir fur 1~34-year post-de~+eloped flow rate {GS~VI Page 3-6}. ~~~na❑€~f.~ 6. Sump prior ta outlet to ccantrol structure (GSM Figure 4-3)- re1101LA 7. 1' min. freebuard at 50-year design storm is provided (GSM Figure 4-3). veS❑NbIINJI 8. SCS method used in rou#ing analysis for detention pand sizing (GSM Page 4-20). vas0Ma❑rrra► a. Yf yes, 6asins with CN values that tliffer by 20 points or rnure have been evaluated separately, and then added . (GSM Page 3-8) Yes[INoCINIR 9, Qp05t -<Qj]re (CTSM PSge 3-6)- wi❑ho❑N,A' 10. Vposr sVpre, nf rn C'nnditions or deerned necessary due decision o-f County Engineer (GSM Page 3-6). ve9❑NoEINfA 11. Berm cotnpaction and lift requirements are specified (G51Vi Page 4-30). YES❑NILA 12. Sypass flows tawards a natural discharge point (GSM Page 3-6). res❑lqoO€v,,a EVAPORATIVE FOND rea❑NQOnrrAE 1. "Gonditiun A" - no surface d.ischarge: hald ali p ost-develop ed valurne; begin 2 yr cycle with 100 yr storrxY in pond (GSM Page 3-10). YES❑Na❑rrJO 2. "Condition B " -existing surface discharge: post minus pre-development voluxne, with 1.2 safety factor; 2 yr cycle (GSM Page 3-9), Yes❑N4❑Nrn a. Ifyes, in a,ddition, a separate detentian storage system is prouided to attenuate peak f]ows during design events. ~~~EIN6EINra 3. L)etention system is designed in accvrdance with SW Guidelines (see checklist a6uve). YeS❑Na❑Vn 4. Water budget cycle iterations have been provided: starting at several different manths (typically Oct through Feb) (GSM Page 3-1 0). vesONXIMn a. If yes, the month that nets the greatest overall (total at end ofcycle) storage volume is used for final design. v.EIn4EI~1~ 5. Averag~e a~.nua'l precipit~it1 or~ rate has be e n ac~justed for lc~c ation (Eig 2 9) (GSM Page 3- 1,1 ~~es❑~►4❑ru~ 6. R.,uz~of~volurx~es are deterzra.ined by the SCS hydrograph rnethod (GSM Page 3-11). ~r~o~ro~rrIn a. Ifyes, runuff valumes have calculat-ed separa#ely for pernteable and irnpervivus area, and then added together. Y~o~o❑Ni} b. Zf yes, antecedent moisture canditinns have beer~ taI~en inta accou.nt far frozen and satura~ted ground can~itions. Y~❑~ro❑rua The potential ofmounding, dowPnstream impacts, etc were investigated and discussed (GSM i'age 3-11). ENG All Forms & PragrarnsfPlark Review Checklist.doc Page 7of 9 Revised: 0 2l2 $!0Z Yes❑NoONIn~k 208 LOT PLANS CHECKI.IST YeSONZIwn 1. Lot plans are on 8'/Z" x 11" paper or legal size (GSM App. F, Addendum to Sect. 4). ves❑NoON/A 2. The lot number, block number, subdivision name, date drawn, scale, north arrow and street name (GSM App. G2). YesONoOv/a 3. Easement dimensions are in relation to property lines or comers (GSM App. C-2). vcs❑ro❑N/A 4. Swale floor dimensions are in relation to property lines or comers (GSM App. C-2). vesOroON/a 5. Swale floor elevarion shown (GSM App. C-2). ves0INoON/A 6. Location of curb and sidewalk (or edge of asphalt) are shown. Yes[]r,oO,v/a 7. Depth from the normal flowline to bottom of swale is indicated. vXIrrXIwa, 8. Rim elevation drywell type, frame and grate type, centerline offset and station are shown (GSM App. C-2). ve50No0N/A 9. Any drainage ditches, or other related easements are shown (GSM App. C-2). Yes❑,vol]N/A 10. Existing easements, buildings, future set asides, and required building setback lines are shown (GSM App. C-2). ves❑Nol]N1A 11. A P.E. stamped and dated all pages of the Lot Plans (GSM App. C-2). Yes❑Nol]N/a 11. A cross section of the drainage facilities (ie, swale, drywell, catch basin, ditch) is on a second sheet (GSM App. G2). veSOrroOn/A 13. The cross section shows the concrete apron, R.O.W. line, curb, sidewalk, grate, normal flow line of the curb or edge of asphalt and specifies sod or seed mix (GSM App. G2). ENG All Forms & Programs/Plan Review Checklist.doc Page 8 of 9 Rcvised: 02l28/02 -c ~ S ~F Appg+fJ~ , ~ ~ COINDITip-s . - ~f ~ . - J o j,~►t . ~ Q rcL , _ - ~n~' c _ • 1,} - _ Col_ ~ - _ - ~ . - . ~ - - - r • ~ . ' ~ j,,, ~ S • ~ 't. dcr rn~ St ' ~ - ~ , - ~ r ~ b~~u. p.,,t_%S - _ ~~~--k.= t ~ QI,6 s pTES ys i 3 . 1,~or~ ~V ~1r~► b~- ~ ~ tt i •~,a r - 010 l _s_~►-~ ~y-',,~ ~ r ~ _ • r_ - t - V4 ~ ~k~ . • Q-~`- ~ ~,o~,.B~~'`a` ~ le -t.yr .rf_ Ace - ~ • R ~ ~ - ~ _ • a,,,~t,, - ~ ` - - Z+ Page - = o►twa.0~~~'~ - -Nno: ~ 1 ~ t~ _ ~ t ~Q~ c r~o fs 4+tl-l t ~ r lo~ • S~ ~ ~ ~ c ;s~..aoc , a G~p11 Eorms &pro~ms $00 EN A` O~S1Q2 * Iv ~ ~ M Rev~ ed'. ~.~.~t'DM'~ _ ..wft• A i ~ PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PROJECT Q I~'SGD PROJECT NAME: S h C ~e 44l 14JA REVIEW I DATE: _VU/471 COUNTY REVIEIYVER: 6NlM ' PROJECT ENGINEER: D0 u5 De4mAMA REVIEW STDS: Review tlie Pre-Design Meeting Notes and check for urtique design criteria; copy notes if applicable. ROAD AND DRAINAGE P AN - BASIC ELEMENT ✓ ✓ Ye ~a❑N/n❑ 1. The first sh~t of ~plans ha~e project titl , vicinit~ap, STK, standard notes, mdex, and certifcation statement. Yes o❑wn❑ 2. North arrow, scale, benchmark, and station equations are shown. v roON/a❑ 3. Exisring and proposed utilities are shown. v~ o❑N/a❑ 4. Curb retum elevarions (BCR, MCR, ECR) are shown. ve:%o0rr1a0 5. Curb grades are _ 0.5 YesoNoON/Alq 6. Cul-de-sac curb is shown in profile. Yes o❑N/n❑ 7. A typical cross secrion is identified for each individual road, public or private. Y. No1:1 n/AX 8. All ditches are shown in profile and cross-section, and have a minimum grade of 0.5%. vCs r.o❑N/n❑ 9. Pipes and culverts are shown in profile (types, stations, offsets, lengths and inverts). ves No0N/A❑ 10. Locations of curb inlets, grates, drywells (hard structures) are referenced by stations and offsets. v" 4o0N/A0 11. Swale floor is dimensioned, with floor elevation, sideslopes and depth indicated in the plan view and cross section. - va o[Ir,n❑ 12. Dryland grass seed mix is proposed where applicable, or hydroseed, sod or turf is specified. Ves[]no0N/K13. Maintenance access is provided to all ponds, swales and structures. veAo0N/A0 14. Random check indicates that pipe profile information correlates with general notes and plan view information. ves❑No%/n❑ 15. Erosion and Sedimentation Control plans are provided as part of the submittal package. WM stA6M4 DRAINAGE REPORT - BASIC REQUIREMENTS s si n 0~ c.oh-~'t~urs ~ v~ ~oON/A❑ 1. Separate pre-developed and post-developed basin maps, with contours, are provided. C nn+ Yes noON/.~❑ 2. Existing natural drainage courses, floodpla~ and ~~vetlands are shown on the basin maps (and plans, where necessary). ,res o❑N/n❑ 3. Existing sheet flow patterns are maintained; no drainage is concentrated into a point discharge. ves vo❑N/a 4. Hydrologic calculations utilize the appropriate method: Rational Method forY10 acres and SCS Method for _ 10 acres. Yes❑INoON/A 5. Post-developed basins with CN values that differ by 20 pt have separate hydrographs for permeable & impervious areas. vesoNoON/A❑ 6. Hydrologic calcs: nsite 10 ~ ffsite 50 yr runoff event for swales; 50-yr dev volume for deten. ponds, or meet conditions. w l dLy~~A -t O.h0f+ Yestko0Y/n❑ 7. 208 calculations include driveways, and sidewalks if directly adjacent to roads. ves0No0N/AX% 8. Evaporative pond design utilizes a water balance cycle, 100-year storm in pond (Condition A). vuONo❑N/A 9. Freeboard in detention, retention and evaporative ponds is a minimum of 1 ft. Yes❑No❑N/n 10. Berm design is provided for detention ponds in fill areas, particularly if adjacent to developed property. v.Xo[:]►v/a❑ 11. Calculations for clear passing width are included 12 ft for local access, 16 ft for collector arterials and 24 ft for minor arterials. vcl)qrro❑N/A❑ 12. Runoffrates, for each separate basin, are compared; looking at entire basin versus road area only. YesONo 13. Ditch calculations are provided and are designed for the 50 year storm plus 30% freeboard. ves 11 rro v/a❑ 14. Pipe network analysis indicates pipe velocities of 4 ft/s (min) and a&eeboard of 0.75 ft(min) in catchbasins and manholes. Wl t, Sl~~OYV~ 1~ PI~G Cl~~ Gvt.~~t,}~,'M S veX'o[:]N/A❑ 15. Curb and grate inlet capacities are calculated and included. . ,L v~ONo nIn❑ 16. Sight distance analyses are included. W S~ bM 1 T Updated: 02-11-02 Page I of I • + ' - 1 ii Pre-Design Meeting Notes SPokane CountY Engineers Office ~KAK COLZUY Project Name: G~ette4 ~Q~Ge it h'~~-ld. Project Number: Project Applicant: PuSter "eltrYla,l~" . Project Engineer: DOLLl DeSroO nCk Firm: G L('i SS O Gl a es Meeting Date: oZ.U 1 o 0 a. Meeting Time: Q 0 aYY1• ~ . County Staff Present at Meeting: ~11dv C..attaq.-- Other Meeting Attendees: namelrepresenting nameJrepresenting namelrepresenting namJrepresenting General Items 1. Spokane County Standards to be used (circle one): 1981 1995 1999 2001 2. Does the Engineer have a copy of the Conditions of Approval? ~ 3. List special requirements required by the Conditions of Approval, EIS, or MDNS. reference description reference description reference description reference description reference description reference description reference description ' reference description referencc description Page 1 of 4 ~ ~ . Road Classification and Design Criteria #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 Road Name Sh`(ti e Re Lane Classification Pr1YA~• ~pq,d Pr~ Rao~- , Land Slope/Terrain Minimum ROW Width ~ 1 A rl ~i Design Speed a, Q Min. Horiz. Curve (00 --~-y Maac/Min Grade (qo p, C, 1a, J r Stopping Sight Distance t a,s Sag/Crest Vertical Curves 2,0 t0-.~ ' Roadway Width (eawA pn # ~ ~v~A) Border Easement Width (commercial) I Curb required? Type Np (Tlk R Qropo$O ~ Sidewalk required? s Separated? Both sides? ND ~ Intersection Return Radii 30 Road-surfacing design ~-~~,~,y method (County matrix*, • - ~ AASHTO, other) rnQd-r 1 * In order to use the County matrix, a geotechnical report needs to be submitted that includes soil borings and a recommended design soil type per the Unificd Soil Classification (USC) System. - - - - - - ~ Basin Maps , - - - I i( Yes 0 No 0 N/A A pre-developed basin map is available for review. ~ i ~ Fl Yes 0 No 0 N/A The basin map shows sufficient contours. I B(Yes 0 No 0 N/A The basin map depicts all the contributing off-site runoff. ~ l(Yes 0 No 0 N/A The pre-developed basin limits and surface conditions appear to be correct. I It Yes 0 No 0 N/A A preliminary post-developed basin map is available for review. ~I ~l(Yes 0 No 0 N/A The post developed basin limits appear to be correct. ~ 0 Yes IVNo 0 N/A A site visit is needed to verify basin limits. Date: Page 2 of 4 e ~ ~ Drainage Design l~ Yes 0 No 0 N/A The site is located within the Aquifer Sensinve Area (ASA). 0 Yes B' No 0 N/A The site is located within a Stormwater Ordinance Area. 0 Yes 9( No 0 N/A The site is located within a 100-year floodplain (contact Tammie Williams). ~ I 0 Yes t~ No 0 N/A A defined natural drainage charmel is located on the site (needs to be placed in a ~ drainage easement sized according to the Guidelines). I 0 Yes C(No 0 N/A A classified wetland or stream is located on the site (contact Spokane County ~ I Planning, Dept of Ecology and/or Dept of Natural Resources). I 0 Yes VNo 0 N/A Steep slopes or highly erodible soils are present. , 0 Yes Bt No 0 N/A A natural depression is located on the site (replacement of storage volume needs to ~ be addressed). ~Yes 0 No 0 N/A The drainage facility is located in a separate tract if greater than 1,200 sq. ft. . 1. The onsite soils are: Ourtsorl.. 2. The type of system proposed for disposing of runoff is: ad(Infiltration i^ - I B(Yes 0 No 0 N/A The soils are approved for drywell installation (Bong*, Bonner, Garrison, Hagan, ~ Marble*, Phoebe*, Springdale). * May require in-place permeability testing. I ~ 0 Yes VNo 0 N/A In-place permeaUility testing is required. ~ l(Yes 0 No 0 N/A Subsurface investigations are required (i.e. drywells in non-approved soils and I ~ hillside developments, downstream analysis). . , '1'+~s~t S I~t~l"S ~ V~r 1s_501 l$ ❑ Eva oration - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A Discussed liner requirements. i 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A Subsurface investigations are required (i.e. verify that limiting layer will not cause mounding). I ❑ Detention 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A There is a natural discharge point and legal access to drainage way (if no, 1 detention is not allowed). i ~ 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A Must control discharge to predeveloped rates. I 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A Must control discharge to predeveloped volumes. ~ 0 Yes 0 No 0 N/A Subsurface investigations are required (i.e. downstream impacts, hillside developments, etc.). I I ' I - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ~ Page 3 of 4 ~ > - Discuss any downstream surface conditions or down-gradient subsurface conditions that will impact the design of the drainage facilities. M01r1G 4ChOWVI At 0~1r. ~ Will a Concept Drainage Plan be required for a non-conventional system or design element? 1~ r Notes: ~ Gncc,k. 9riva#,eo rmd w idi-h - a-oo 1Smndards r~ea~r ?7 , , Tf so~ can► rn~► Qx *6111n5 _ M u st ~ns t{~or1 to Gu r rP,nt SfiandoroZ ' i( A blank Submittal Checklist was provided to the design engineer. E( A blank Pre-Submittal Checklist was provided to the design engineer. E( A copy of the completed Pre-Design Meeting Notes was provided to the design engineer. These Pre-design Mceting Notes are intended to clarify various design elements and requirements for this project, and are not to be construed in any manner whatsoevcr as a waiver of any Conditions of Approval, Spokane County Code, Spokane County Standaeds for Road and Sewer Construction, Spokanc County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, other codes, statutes or regulations applicable to the project. t2ev. 0311 9;2002 Page 4 of 4 $66kan, ,;0OValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org August 25, 2004 Mr. Robert Heitman Jr. 8225 N. Division St. Spokane, WA 99203 . Re: Shelley Lake Development Mr. Heitman, A condition of the Shelley Lake Development assigns the financial responsibility for . signalization at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue to the applicant. Construction of the sigpal shall occur when the i.ntersection meets warrants for signalization based on the Manual of Uniform TraiTic Control Devices. Please see enclosed conditions of approval. We have recently performed a traffic signal warrant study at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue. The intersection meets traffic signal warrants. There appears to be two courses of action that can be used: 1. The City of Spokane Valley and you can enter into a developer's a.greement whereby Spokane Valley will design and construct the traffic signal and the Shelley Lake development will provide funding for the traffic signal. 2. The traffic signal may be included as part of the next phase of infrastructure improvements if the next phase will begin in the near future. The Shelley Lake - development will design and construct the traific signal prior to the finalization of the next development phase in accordance with standard procedures. Another issue is Spokane County has conditioned several developments north of Sprague Ave on providi.ng a share of the cost of the traffic signal. We will endeavor to collect and apply all such cost sharing to this project. Please contact me as to the manner in which you intend to proceed. Sincerely, Don Ramsey, Traffic Engineer Department of Public Works C: John Hohman, Senior Engineer ~ ,f;+ L• :$r~r~:...:;t Vertical and Horizontal sight distance based on design speed of that roadway shall be complied wfth. To make the connec#ion, certain construc#ion may be required 01 within the public ri9ht-of-waY of Rotchford Drive within Rotchford Acre Tracts. The applicant shall be responsible for any requirements relating to the off-site construction of this roadway. The applicant shall impiement and comply with any _.design recommendations by the County Engineer for restricting speeds on Rotchford Drive. r 30. Construction of Conkiin Road per the requirements aforementioned shall be done in . y wT --•r~ the 1 st phase. This construction is required because of the existing condition of Conklin Road and the poor levels af service at the intersection of 4th Avenue and Sullivan Road. ln conjunction with the Conklin Road 1mprovements, the r9ealigned 4th .-i.. Avenue shall also be constructed. AnY under9round worlc for the Placement of the future signal at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue shall also be done in this 1st t .7 11 I 1 I I i J ~ 31. Financial responsibility for signalization at Conklin Road and Sprague Avenue shall be the responsibility of the applicarrt. Const~'ction of the signal shall occur when this intersection meets warrants for signalization based on the Manual of Uniform Traffic Corrtrol Devices (MUTCD). ~ 32. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan, more specifically the Arterial Road Plan, an element of the Adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan, designates the South Valley Arterial as a Controlted Access Principal Arterial. The present plan does not show an intersection of this facality with Conklin Road. Based on this approved plan, the applicant shall be responsible for the construction of 4th Avenue from Conklin Road east to Steen Road to Spokane County Road Standards. The applicant shall construct or provide adequate surety for this irnprovement prior to the final phase of this proposed plat, provided this condifion shall be null and void if the Atterial Road Plan is changed to reflect an at grade crossing of the South Valley Arterial at Conklin Road. Wthout this c;ondition of approval Spokane County Engineering would recommend denial of this plat, since a pre-existing plan deiineated no at grade . crossing of the South Valley Arterial with Conklin Road and the applicant was aware of this condition prior to this public hearing. Adequate roadway infra-structure would not be available for this plat without this provision since the Level of Senrice far the intersection of 4th Avenue and Sullivan Road is inadequate for this plat at build out. 4ff-site right-of way for this improvement shall be secured by Spokane County and the applicant shall reimburse Spokane County for a proportionate share of the cost of the right-of-way. • -1-L 33. The 4th Avenue Extension Road intersection with Conklin Road shall be aligned so as to provide for the potential alignmetit of 4th Avenue as a four-way intersection. Spokane County will not vacate the present 4th Avenue right-of-way to allow for this future connection. . dFainage . a-nd- disposal, . . . , , . PE-1750-94/PUDE-4-94 , Tlme Extension Page 14 Traffic Signal Warrant Study Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Summary Description of Streets Sprague Avenue has two traffic lanes and a left tum lane in each direction at it,s intersection with Conklin Road. It is a principal arterial. The posted speed limit on Sprague Avenue is 35 . MPH. Conklin Road has one traffic lane and a left tum lane in each direction. It is currently classffied as a local access street on the adopted arterial street plan. It functions as a residential collector arterial for the developing area to the north and south. It is controlled by STOP signs at Sprague Avenue. The posted spsed limit on Conklin Road is 25 MPH. Traffic Signal Warrant Satisfied 1 Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume yes 2 Four-Hour Vehicular Volume yes 3 Peak Hour no 4 Pedestrian Volume not studied 5 School Crossing no 6 Coordinated Signal System no 7 Crash Expsrience no 8 Roadway Network no Recommendation Installation of a new traffic signal on Sprague Avenue and Conklin Road meets two traffic signal warrants and is recommended. ( Don Ramsey, P.E. Traffic Engineer Sprague Avenue at Conkli.n Road Traffic Sigaal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Warrant 1, Eight-Hour Vehicular Volume Support: The Minimum Vehicular Volume, Condition A, is intended for application at locations where a large volume of intersecting traffic is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. The Interruption of Continuous Traffic, Condition B, is intended for application at locations where Condiaon A is not satisfied and where the traffic volume is so heavy that traffic on a minor intersecting street suffers excessive delay or conflict in entering or crossing the major street It is intended that Warrant 1 be treated as a single warrant. If Condition A is satisfied, then the criteria for Warrant 1 is satisfied and Condition B and the combination of Conditions A and B are not needed. Similarly, if Condition B is satisfied, then the criteria for Warrant 1 is satisfied and the combination of Conditions A and B is not needed. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours on an average day: A. The vehicles per hour given in both the 100 peroent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist for the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; or B. The vehicles per hour given in both the 100 peroent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist for the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection. In applying each condition the major-street and minor-sheet volumes shall be for the same 8 hours. On the minor-street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 8 hours. Guidance: Where Condition A is not satisfied and condition B is not satisfied, and after an adequate trial of other altematives has failed to solve the traffic problems; the combination standard may be used. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the following conditions exist for each of any S hours on an average day: C. The vehicles per hour given in both the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist for the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respecctively, to the intersection; and D. The vehicles per hour given in both the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist for the major-street and the higher-volume minor-street approaches, respectively, to the intersection. These major-street and minor-street volumes shall be for the same 8 hours for each condition; however the 8 hours satisfied in Condition A shall not be required to be the same 8 hours satisfied in Condition B. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of these 8 hours. Study Resufts: Condition A- Number of hours met 0 Condition B- Number of hours met 8 Combination - Number of hours Combination of A and B met not applicable Warrant 1 Satisfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Signal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume Support: The Four-Hour Vehicular Volume signai warrant conditions are intended to be applied where the volume of intersecting is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic signal. Standard: The need for a traffic conVol signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that, for each of any four hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major-street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher volume minor-street appraach (one direction only) all fall above the curve in Figure 4C-1 for the existing combination of approach lanes. ' Study Results: Number of hours above line 4 Warrant 2 Satisfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Signal Wanant Study August 18, 20Q4 Warrant 3, Peak Hour Support: - The Peak Hour signal warrant is intended for use at a location where traffic cond'rtions are such that for a minimum of 1 hour of an average day, the minor-street traffic suffers undue delay when entering or crossing the major street. Standard: This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high-0ccupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time. . The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following two categories are met: A. If all three of the following conditions exist for the same 1 hour (any four consecutive 15- minute periods) of an average day: 1. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor-street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle-hours for a one-lane approach; or 5 vehicle-hours for a twalane approach, and 2. The volume on the same minor-street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes, and 3. The total entering volume service during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. B. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher-volume minor-street approach (one direction only) for 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes. Study Results: Unusual case not met Category A _ Condition 1 not measured Condition 2 met Condition 3 met Category B met Warrant 3 Not Satisfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Signal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume Support The Pedestrian Votume signal warrant is intended for application where the traffic volume on a major street is so heavy that pedestrians experience excessive delay in crossing the major street. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or midblock crossing shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following criteria are met A. The pedestrian volume crossing the major street at an intersection of midblock focation during an average day is 100 or more for each of any 4 hours or 190 or more during any 1 hour; and B. There are fewer than 60 gaps per hour in the traffic stream of adequate length to allow pedestrians to cross during the same period when the pedestrian volume criterion is satisfied. Where there is a divided street having a median of sufficient width for pedestrians to wait, the requirement applies separately to each direction of vehicle traffic. The Pedestrian Volume signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to tlhe nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 90m (300 ft), unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Study Results: . Criterion A Number of hours 4-hour volume met not studied 1-hour volume met not studied Criterion B Inadequate gaps in 4-hour period not studied Inadequate gaps in 1-hour period not studied Distance to nearest signal mile Warrant 4 Not Satsfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Sigaal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Warrant 5, School Crossing Support: The School Crossing signal warrant is intended for application where the fact that school . children cross the major street is the principal reason to consider installing a traffic oontrol signal. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study af the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of school children at an established school crossing across the major street shows that the number of adequate gaps in the stream during the period is less than the number of minutes in the same period (see Section 7A.03) and there are a minimum of 20 students during the highest crossing hour. . Before a decision is made to install a traffic control signal, consideration shall be given to the implementation of other remedial measures, such as warning signs and flashers, school speed zones, school crossing guards, or a grade-separated crossing. The School Crossing signal warrant shall not be applied at locations where the distance to the nearest traffic control signal along the major street is less than 90m (300 ft), unless the proposed traffic control signal will not restrict the progressive movement of traffic. Study Results: Established school crossing no Adequate gaps not studied School Pedestrian Volume not studied Other measures not applicable Distanced to nearest signal '/z mile Warrant 5 Not Satisfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Signal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System Support: , Progressive movement in a coordinated signal system sometimes necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where they would not othenwise be needed in order to maintain proper platooning of vehicles. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study finds that one or more of the following criteria is met A. On a one-way street or a street that has traffic predominately in one direction, the adjacent traffic control signals are so far apart that they do not provide the necessary degree of vehicular pfatooning. B. On a two-way street, adjacent traffic control signals do not provide the necessary degree of platooning and the proposed and adjacent traffic control signals will collectively provide a progressive system. Study Results: Criterion A not met Criterion B not met Spacing to nearest signal '/z mile each direction on Sprague Avenue Warrant 6 Not Satisfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Signal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Warrant 7, Crash Experience Support: The Crash Experience signal warrant conditions are intended for application where the severity and frequency of crashes are the principal reasons to consider instaliing a traffic controi signal. Standani: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met: . A. Adequate trial of altematives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and B. Five or more reported crashes of a type susceptible to correction by a traffic c,ontrol signal, have occurred in a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and C. For each of any 8 hours on an average day, the vehicles per hour in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1, or the vph in both 80 % columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exists on the major-street and the higher-volume minor- street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant These major-street and minor street volumes shall be for the-same 8 hours. On the minor-street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the same approach during each of the 8 hours. Study Results: Criterion A, Trial of altematives not studied Criterion B, Number of correctable crashes 1 . Criterion C Condition A, number of hours met 8 Condition B, number of hours met 12 Pedestrian Volume - 4 hour volume, number of hours met not studied Pedestrian Volume 1 hour volume met not studied Wafrant 7 Not Satisfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Signal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Warrant 8, Roadway Network Support: Installing a traffic control signal at some intersections might be justified to encourage concentration and organization of traffic flaw on a roadway network. Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the common intersection of two of more major routes meets one or both of the following criteria: A. the intersection has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of at least 1,00 vehicles per hour during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has 5- year projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during and average weekday; or B. The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected, entering volume of at - least 1,000 vehicles per hour for each of any 5 hours on a nonnormal business day (Saturday or Sunday). A major route as used in this signal warrant shall have one or more of the following characteristics: A. It is part of the street or highway system that serves as the principal roadway network for through traffic flow; or . B. It includes naral or suburban highways outside, entering, or traversing a City; or C. It appears as a major route on an official plan, such as a major street plan in an urban area traffic and transportation study. Study Resul#s: Criterion A Entering peak hour volume yes Warrant 1 met within 5 years meets now Warrant 2 met within 5' years meets now Warrant 3 met wrthin 5 years no Criterion B Number hours on Saturday or Sunday met not studied Characteristics of major route Sprague Conklin Characteristic A yes no Characteristic B yes no Characteristic C yes no Warrant 8 Not Satisfied Sprague Avenue at Conklin Road Traffic Signal Warrant Study August 18, 2004 Spokane Countv Public Wd, Division of Engineerinp, Traffic Section Road Name : Conklin Rd Site: 0627-1-4739 ~ xation : North of Sprague Ave Date: 07/12/04 Operator : RC Interval Mon 12 Tue 13 Wed 14 Thu 15 Fri 16 Sat 17 Sun 18 Weekday Avg. Begin NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB 12:AM 3 3 1 S 5 4 • s s ; s s 3 4 01:00 • ' 3 4 3 0 4 1 s • ' • • 3 1 02:00 • + 1 1 2 0 3 1 * • • • • * 2 0 03:00 s • 2 0 3 2 2 2- • t • * s s 2 1 04:00 • • 4 2 1 0 0 2 • • • ' ~ * 1 1 05:00 ' • 7 10 10 15 ll 13 • ' + • * s 9 12 06:00 • • 21 13 22 8 17 10 • • • • ~ ' 20 10 07:00 37 26 34 41 38 31 ' * ' * s • 36 32 08:00 22 22 32 33 32 33 • ' • ' • ~ 28 29 09:00 • s 40 32 42 37 36 38 • ' " ' s * 39 35 10:00 • • 41 28 45 42 34 34 ~ ~ • + * * 40 34 11:00 40 35 32 41 20 46 ' • ' ' + s + ~ 30 40 12:PM 62 72 54 58 58 54 • ~ * * • * + s 58 61 Ol :00 54 26 34 40 40 40 * s • • ; • ~ 42 35 02:00 55 38 39 36 48 43 a s s • • : ~ ► 47 39 03:00 40 43 42 38 61 18 • • • • • ' • ~ 47 33 04:00 54 52 66 49 74 28 * + ' • • ~ ; • 64 43 05:00 56 38 37 54 56 43 ' • • • • • ~ ' 49 45 06:00 43 27 46 41 46 48 • ' • ' • • 45 38 07:00 22 30 34 28 31 30 * * + • • s 29 29 08:00 18 18 15 19 25 24 ; • • • ~ • • * 19 20 49:00 30 14 21 24 28 20 " • ' * • • ! 26 19 10:00 12 10 9 10 S 10 • ' • • • ~ • f 8 10 I1:00 2 4 6 3 S 6 ' • * • • • 4 4 Totals 488 407 616 582 692 593 182 169 0 0 0 0 0 0 651 575 .ombined 895 1,198 1,285 351 0 0 . 0 1226 SDlit % 54.5 45.5 51.4 48.6 53.9 46.1 51.9 48.1 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 53.1 46.9 AM . • Peak Hr 11:00 11:00 10:00 I 1:00 10:00 11:00 07:00 09:00 • * ' ; 10:00 11:00 Volume 40 35 41 41 45 . 46 38 38 ' ' ' * • • 40 40 PM ' PeakHr 12:00 12:00 04:00 12:00 04:00 12:00 • • ' • • ; ~ • 04:00 12:00 Volume 62 72 66 58 74 54 ~ s s • • ~ * • 64 61 . . 5pokane Countv Public Woi Division of Engineering Traffc Section Road Name : Sprague Ave Site: 4739-2-0627 I' ion : East of Conklin Rd Date: 07/12/04 Operator : RC - Interval Mon 12 Tue 13 Wed 14 Thu 15 Fri 16 Sat 17 Sun 18 Weekday Avg. Begin WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB . WB EB 12:AM • ' 44 50 41 40 38 51 " ' • • • * 41 47 01:00 • s 22 20 29 37 28 24 ' * • ' • • 26 27 02:00 • • 10 16 19 10 19 16 • * ' • ' ~ 16 14 03:00 • • 13 16 18 16 15 16 ' • ; ' ' ' 15 16 04:00 • # 38 39 41 56 42 61 • ' * • • * 40 52 05:00 • ' 120 115 96 106 119 130 # • ' ' • • 111 117 06:00 • • 239 246 284 161 242 261 255 222 07:00 s • 473 360 464 330 472 366 • ; ' ' • • 469 352 08:00 • ' 457 406 497 415 556 442 ' • • s • ' 503 421 09:00 • • 548 507 507 443 510 450 ' * * s s « 521 466 10:00 343 331 584 546 612 556 635 568 • • ; 543 500 11:00 633 618 708 620 633 650 • ! ' ' • * • 658 629 12:PM 728 800 700 714 677 703 * ' ' ' • ' • • 701 739 01:00 700 701 666 709 614 688 660 699 02:00 670 702 654 776 726 704 • ' ' • ' • ' ' 683 727 03:00 720 750 693 637 694 711 ' ' • • s ' ' ' 702 699 04:00 774 864 732 604 706 884 s • + : . s s + 737 782 05:04 718 935 742 619 777 956 * • ' * • • 745 836 06:00 512 641 556 472 580 710 ' • • • ` ' ' • 549 607 07:00 380 506 ' 440 386 470 517 ' • * ' * • * 430 469 08:00 356 382 294 384 374 460 • ' ' • • • ' * 341 408 09:00 232 317 258 306 316 386 • " ' ' • • 268 336 10:00 136 144 146 149 196 208 • ' ' ' ' • • • 159 167 11:00 90 94 70 ' 76 80 93 + • ~ * s • . s gp 87 Totats 6,992 7,785 9,207 8,773 9,451 9,836 2,676 2,385 0 0 0 0 0 0 9,253 9,419 , U _ined 14,777 17.980 19,287 5,061 0 0 0 18,672 Split % 473 52.7 511 48.8 49.0 51.0 52.9 47.1 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 49.6 50.4 AM ' , - Peak Hr 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 ' ' ' ' ' • 11:00 11:00 Volume 633 618 708 620 633 . 650 635 568 • ' • • s • 658 629 PM PeakHr 04:00 05:00 05:00 02:00 05:00 05:00 • • • * • • ' ~ 05:00 05:00 Volume 774 . 935 742 776 777 956 * • • ' ' • ' • 745 836 Spokane Count.y Public Wa , Division of Engineering . Traffic Section Road Name : Sprague Ave Site: 4739-4-0627 i ion : West of Conklin Rd Daie: 07/12/04 Operator : RC Interval Mon 12 Tue 13 Wed 14 Thu 15 Fri 16 Sat 17 Sun 18 Weekday Avg. Begin EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB 12:AM • ' S6 34 62 36 56 26 • s • ~ s • 58 32 01:00 • • 21 18 51 28 28 34 * * f ~ ~ ~ 33 26 02:00 16 4 20 22 16 22 • * + + ~ • 17 16 03:00 19 10 21 18 17 18 • * • • ; • 19 15 04:00 • ' 38 34 64 43 65 42 ' • ' • * • 55 39 05:00 • 119 101 136 103 132 118 ' * • ~ s 129 107 06:00 • • 272 201 256 296 260 256 ' ~ * • * • 262 251 07:00 • + 446 373 455 455 410 458 • • ' • ' t 437 428 08:00 • • 518 358 472 462 475 512 f + + + s 488 444 09:00 • • 628 458 S48 476 558 516 * ' * * • • 578 483 10:00 622 484 678 512 680 602 686 578 ' • ' ' • • 666 544 11:00 773 540 774 661 764 615 • ~ ' * * * ' * 770 605 12:PM 952 602 929 694 826 664 • • * • • # * * 902 653 01:00 870 578 860 638 792 604 * ' • ~ ~ • + • 840 606 02:00 906 558 980 582 840 669 • ' • ' * * • ~ 908 603 03:00 890 572 916 610 801 625 • ' ' # ' • • ' 869 602 04:00 1,077 602 943 604 990 650 • ' * • + ~ + « 1,003 618 05:00 1,114 522 1,141 627 1,106 689 ~ ' * * • * * # 1,120 612 06:00 764 374 732 474 776 530 ' • ' ' * • • 757 4S9 07:00 589 274 618 378 582 419 • ' • ' ' s • • 596 357 08:00 494 252 568 254 567 335 • ~ • • • • • + ~ 543 280 09:00 417 142 454 207 454 294 • • • * * • • ; 441 214 10:00 171 94 206 116 250 174 ' • ' * * • • • 209 128 11:00 105 73 120 60 105 74 ' • • + « + 110 69 Totals 9,744 5,667 12,052 8,008 11,618 8,883 2,703 2,580 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,810 8,191 C,. .,med 15,411 20,060 20,501 5,283 0 0 0 20,001 Svlit % 63.2 36.8 60.1 39.9 56.7 43.3 51.2 48.8 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 59.0 41.0 AM ' ' - Peak Hr 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 10:00 10:00 # ' + s • • 11:00 11:00 Volume 773 540 774 661 764 . 615 686 578 # ' + • • • 770 605 PM PeakAr 05:00 12:00 0S:00 12:00 05:00 05:00 • ' • ' * ' * * 05:00 12:00 Volume 1,114 602 1,141 694 1,106 689 ' • s • • • • • 1,120 653 T_~ T.:t_ . •r~n • ni..+ . Spokane County PubIic W4 , Division of Engineerinp, Traffic Section Road Name : Conklin Rd Sibe: 0627-34739 : ocation : South of Sprague Ave Date: 07/12/04 Operator : RC Interval Mon 12 Tue 13 Wed 14 Thu 15 Fri 16 Sat 17 Sun 18 Weekday Avg. Begin SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB 12:AM 10 9 10 8 11 10 ' • • • • s 10 9 01:00 6 1 7 5 3 2 * ' • ~ • • 5 2 02:00 « s 2 2 1 2 3 4 * s • s ~ * 2 2 03:00 ' • 1 3 2 3 4 4 • • • ~ • s 2 3 04:00 S 10 3 10 7 8 • t • * + • 5 9 05:00 * + 6 38 4 30 7 36 ' ~ ' * • • 5 34 06:00 ' • 15 68 9 74 16 80 * ' • • • • 13 74 07:00 • ' 38 108. 36 122 31 87 • • ' ' • * 35 105 08:00 • • 36 76 44 86 44 104 ' • ' • • • 41 88 09:00 ' • 52 86, 37 68 42 66 s * ' • •s 43 73 10:00 17 14 53 84. 72 73 56 83 ' ' • . ' • * 49 63 11:00 64 79 71 56 77 74 • ' • * + * + • 70 69 12:PM 79 96 88 78. 80 80 • • ~ s • * + 82 84 01:00 67 80 78 72 78 79 • s s s + « • • 74 77 02:00 92 86 78 62 9b . 66 * ~ + + + • + + gg 71 03:00 102 78 92 92. 102 84 • + * + • . gg gq 04:00 133 77 114 64 106 64 ; s • • • • • s 117 68 05:00 152 94 140 92 144 92 • ; • * • ~ • • 145 92 06:00 109 82 122 98 127 lll ; + • * • • 119 97 07:00 80 66 93 61 88 68 ~ * • • # • ; 87 65 08:00 68 46 68 54 77 62 ' • ' ' ' * + • 71 54 09:00 51 45 78 46 66 43 * ' • * " ' ~ ; 65 44 10:00 39 22 35 24 44 24 • ~ ~ ' s « • • 39 23 11:00 12 7 15 8 18 13 ' • • ' • • • • 15 9 Totals 1.065 872 1,296 1,292 1,328 1341 224 484 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,280 1,299 :ombiaed 1,937 2,588 2,669 708 0 0 0 2,579 Split % 55.0 45.0 50.1 49.9 49.8 50.2 31.6 68.4 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 49.6 50.4 AM ' Peak Hr 11:00 11:00 11:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 10:00 08:00 • ' • s s ~ 11:00 07:00 Volume 64 79 71 108 77 . 122 56 104 ' • ' ' • • 70 105 PM PeakHr 05:00 12:00 05:00 06:00 05:00 06:00 • * + • * ~ • • 05:00 06:00 Volume 152 96 140 98 144 111 • * * ~ + ~ ~ • 145 97 T'.' +'s ~inrn •ww~ %Oolq~ 6 ~L 1z5~~ , s _ Np, C - . v s . ~ aWg1p1'' etri ~ ~ p Q~ ~ a D ~ c~ ' ~ oM140 ~~p01nf ~ ~►Y C~ 000" Y ~►1~l1E R~~ ~ + ~ : ~ ~Y To Y elllc~ ► ce~o• ❑ 0 :C ,A ~ ~ ,C ~ oa tP af ~ ~ ~ ~ - `~,o•€' , s ~ ~ ~ ~ N❑ E~ G ~ 1 ' FW L- ~ 4L ~ _ • , ' . , , , . ~ `1... S-IA . , 10 - - - ~J ~ .W'--- oN ~ ~ tc1H~ . t~ L► ~ ' ~j~/!r ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ oM+~art°` 50 . ~ ~ . S'!~ ^ V ~ ~ ~ j:~l 1 25671 ~ • ,t ~ cA t„p ~ Ic s t/ ppt~E ~ ~~'c~ . ~ r ~ N~ dp4~ ►/r ~ A ~°°a~'s''~• p n~°" ' pAf 11,11111111111 illillimoooolo ~ O a ~Ep'~ NO. ~ ~~pN . OF~ . or+ a~° ~ ~ - ~ ^ , ~ ' J~C~-~~• ~ ' OF ~ , . . of ~ ~ ~ . . . 10 ~ . oet, ~,~y ► ~ ~ _ ~ ~''f') ~ 1'~ ~ o • ~ ~ 01 #-.o ~e- fG _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ j r c~-.~r ~ • , d ,r,~„ . ' ~ ~'1v~-~.~E~►~:~°"~'~~ . - ~ ~ IVELOsOFTME~ ~SKee° ' ~ ~ lDPW D , , ~ p90C ~ _ , . ♦ PAW ~ 12 5 6718 ♦ REpofff No. . ~ . • saw* s ~ Q o„~ o . ~ , a o ~ ~ yw,r ❑ .a. • ~ E ~ IN ❑ Ttl~IE ¢Aw p Y Y Y v ~ 1 l 'f E Q 1Q ; S❑ w❑ OF ~ M I p &-Ao o~i, .1 ( ~ ► ~ • 8- , , . . To$~(~`TION ~ N!ON-1MToS'EGTiON o BLOCM( NO. ~ ~ ~µF~1C ~ t ff~~; .7 iR d O. VVAh MiIF P087 ❑ -J Of mmwmoR mss [3 N O E 0'(~ ; ~ = ~ , l'~ FtEf ❑ S ❑ W O 5; ~ ~ ~TM~'~D i~► 115 , i ~ IU~a , yi►1,~1 , , ~ I ' I ► ~ . ~ ' , , . ~ ~ ~ Lf- IA NVY, ' ~ p : ~ ; 4 ` ~ r I'~`~ ► ' ~ r' t ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~EHO., I tt. ~ ~ ~ i ~ I IN OOuAcEC AAEA sNADE ~ ~ ~'~/Q 1 ~O ~ ~ ~oeonoM . ~ ,E"•'~u'l~~~Ltr►~~~~ ' ~of~ 6 I I I O r~suwwcE rA Ov~e' . ~ b Poucr. CHAFM ` $ ~ ~ 1~~ . ~ = . ~ ; . ' . • , r' I7~ . ' • • • _ . 1 , ` , i ~ ; ' ' e , ~ ' li ~ , , e . . ~i~ t ► ` s ! ` , ~ t ~ i~.j ~ ~ ~ . ,t ~ ~ i p . / ~ ( ; iF . _ S Lr' ~ . , ~ ~ 9; '~1+~ • , -7 ' . AS , t "m""w- °F / 5 I, 29 r~ . ~ . ,o . 21 ONMM ow '6 1)1< VIC`~ , ~ ~ _ ' 22~ VE141C1.E NO. ~ ~ . SKADE er oANIPAitLF AFti . ~ , i y , , • ~ y iM~f ; ~ • ~ TOMED B Q~ J < , srnF,~A oTOP_ 10 ~ ~ ~s ~ ~ i `~~(L1~j /i~ ! 24 t 1 ~ RK►~6TEREa~~~~. ~rc =;12 5671 t~ C3 r-O OKAFOE ' ArAMv , ~ c o . ~ pp Q' tdTXTICN gApU dq 0 pAGE 01 OF + I► ~ ' s `~s R PART A 3~~ ~ - I ~ ALRElRRi'T NO. ; 17-3`6 7 l 1g SUPPLEMaNTAL c~oa~~H . . : ~ . . - ~ ~ 3j7~3 L7 ,►W VMME TOWM o wnw=RE o mmmum o . i i , . . rI ~ . t 61 °AMACE THFIMH°`° iu ;7-; oi ±s `r4 i~ i~s > ; : ~ ~ Vq , ~ iA 0 I V~ ~ ~ I ~ ! ~ I ' i i~~ 9~~„~ i Y • , 7; ~ ~ ' . • . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ I „ ~ ~ E ' • ~ - ~ ItRililE OF IKtliiEB ~ ~ ON ww 0~ ~ ; . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 1/~ ~ ~ • ' ~ I ~ ~ • 1 3 { ' ~ 1 Y8l YF11R ' IMICE i 1AOdB ~ FiTYLE i TCW3) OY ~ BFIALIE N11 CAM~OEDAtWA ' I : I • ~ • I r REO1S?BED 41MtEi1 lia. . 1 ~ S 1!~ ~ ~ . i tO~OtiOM BOURANM . . I 00 ~ ! A M rw~ ❑ a POLJCY ~ 13 ! ~ vup Wp CHAFM . - I U ; o~s ns~+~ow ~ wawE - , ~ _ No ' ~ 17~ : • ~ . ~ JJL- ~ MOLW& r, o~m D o n^ i yEK WM I MAKE • yppEL t ETyLE ITONfEDBY i EKnOE W WMWEDMfA ~ ~ Z 3 • ~ I ii601S16ED OAMN9i NfO. WROMt I N~t~ ❑ F vOLJCY ~pp e O ND 0 ' crn►na,. ~ a+A+af Y4; r ~ - ti uN~ ~w►~nr oF ~u~r urioa~ n+~ uws o~ n~ sv~ oc wAs~+noN n+xr n+E ~t~wc ~s ~ aHn c~atcT ~+cw eA.rt.oes► ' .Sr- ~ . i~~l ~ja71 ~'S 31CiNATURE U~ DIST DET QATED: SIGNED ~ ~ ~a~ /117: ; ' A~D~ ~ ; w►aE. j/C► oF; L p Ab . * ' ' - ~ f~ rN-~r • f 3TATE OF WASNINGTON I 7 I 3 I ~ ~ t~ ~ PaUCE TRAFFIC REPORT NO. 1 0 3 1 4 5 2A, 27 COLUSION REPORT ~ _ • 1581971 2 IMEHSTATE ❑ CRY STRwT ❑ ~q~TED 0 3 STATE ROllTE ❑ OT118i ❑ ~ ~ ❑ I ~20 OOtJNTY RO ~ PRNXTE WAY ❑ MT 8 RUN ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~~ M M 0 D Y Y Y Y TiME C240~ COUNTY N MILFS ~ry M 2~ ` ` ' N ❑ E.Iia- IN ❑ S o Wo o~~ 9 . ~ oN (aawnr~v r~iC wnv) fNTERSECTION ~ NON-INTERS~CTION ❑ ~ { ~ ~-J BLOCK NO. ❑ s ~ P ~ MILE POST ❑ OtSTANCE OF (REFERENCE OR CROSS STREET) MI~S a N ❑ E o Si FEfT ❑ S ❑ W o CIO tl~ ~30 ~ ~~OLD gfONE I ; . MET zi ~3~ A+ /fi 2 3 ~ ~7 71013 ITS- ~ oN DUT, o kfUURE OF .UMES _ owlioll Iz c s$ v z 3 ' ~ 1140S :j~1 FRM ,O 33 ,~3 m r~ M°'°~,'~ ~ I ~yXy I T°~° ~ ' ~ ,~f Z ,E~,. ~O~3 ~ i ~ ISTEM OWWER tN~. 2 3 . 3 ~ 9 Tp r~ 1 ' ~ a POLCY i ~ CO 35 ~ ~a.r vFS 0 arxno~r 0 cwume ' 36 ~ 18~ n~oa~e 19 ~wT~ n~RES►coLc ~ ~ ;37 ~ ~----I ~-j10 . 121 2 . 21 i ON DIJTY ❑ wAtuRE oF I►+AFds , 22= I . 2a . ; / ~ JIMEL uat rEw ~n Irwc~ Ma~/~ ~ sTV~ I Tow~ er ' VEH~LE NO. 2 2 , 24 ~ L~wo c sruoE w oAMAaEO ARE► ~ REGtSTE3iED ~)YYN~ MFO. 3 1 . 9TOP~S g . - I ~NSWA►7CE AANCE CO 10 lOTTOlN ~ - Mo NOo CRMM. . ~ C„~ 1 3 452, . ~ o~.S ,~~wS ~ ~7 7y ~ ~ ~o . PART AM"46.159 p rZ97) - PAGE 01 oF L , ~ • LO t 1 e C 1 N a REjTi" wt4~ ❑ ' j ~ f , : . ` ~ ~ , _ ~ d►.~-- ; : ^ ~5~~'aEpo~ 1 - 1591972 . , i ► ; • ` , : j_; ~ ' ; OF ~RtF.g ' ,1 , • . ► j ; , - . , ~ . ~ ~ : . ~ ° ' • - ' . ' ~ O~E~ - ~ ~ . • ~ r - ~ . _~~.-',i , ~E i ' - ~ , • , ~ ~ OF.tIN11jR1~ ~ _ . . ~ : . - . ~,,,~~g, ~ ~ . - . ~ ~ ,l---' ~ '1 ~ . , AD►+T"- a rr'„~ ^ . ~ ' 1 ' ' ' • t .1 ~ ' ~ , • + - ~ oR ►ruUwES , .d:. _ t~• L;! I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ; ► _ ~,p~E r _ ► ~ ~ ` . , noo`~" OF *Wlo*~s ~ .c ~ ~ ' S ~ i . 1 U,~p1G~►~~ ; spoo"Ei 1 , l ~ • i , • i ~ 1 l •1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y 1 '`I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ti . i ~ s ~ ~ • ~ ~ 1~ ~ t t ~ ; /a/~ j; - ,~,?ru Is~'+uE co _ -~-J~i v,~► ~TMEF°`~GO"G ~ w~►t"~ . - ~ TM STOE ~ U~"' ' ~E ~ • ~D ~ , ~ ~ ~ • N~E l J,, f Ale pfi_ S ~ ~ _ - ~'A`Q►E ~ , ~ i pAa A616 BOND ESTIMATE Project Name: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Project Number: P1750D Date: March 24, 2003 ~ Prepared by: GMM SPOKAIkF, COUISU,y Item D.escqIptW1n Qty Unit Unit Price Total Drainage Items 1 Drywell, Type A(incl. backfill, filter fabric, frame & grate) 1 EA $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 2 Drywell, Type B(incl. backfill, filter fabric, frame & grate) 5 EA $ 2,700.00 $ 13,500.00 3 Concrete Inlet, Type 2 2 EA $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 4 WSDOT Inlet and Grate 1 EA $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 5 Curb Inlet, Type 1 7 EA $ 75.00 $ 525.00 6 Metal Frame and Grate 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 600.00 7 Pipe, 15-inch PVC 15 LF $ 25.00 $ 375.00 8 Pipe, 12-inch CPEP or HDPE 40 LF $ 21.00 $ 840.00 9 Pond Excavation Incl. Haul 425 CY $ 5.00 $ 3,400.00 10 Seed, Fertilize and Mulch 10,000 SF $ 0.05 $ 500.00 11 Topsoil 50 CY $ 6.00 $ 300.00 12 Clearing and Grubbing (1-5 acres) 3 AC $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 13 Riprap for Ditch (6 inch minus) 10 CY $ 25.00 $ 250.00 Orainage Items Sub-Tota! $ 30,890.00 Roadway Items 14 Rough Grade (sub-grade preparation) 2,500 CY $ 10.00 $ 25,000.00 15 Base Course 1,270 CY $ 24.00 $ 30,480.00 16 Top Course 1,120 CY $ 24.00 $ 26,880.00 17 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 872 TN $ 45.00 $ 39,240.00 18 Curb and Gutter, Type R 4,300 LF $ 10.00 $ 43,000.00 19 WSDOT Type III Barricade 1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 20 Street Signs 2 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00 21 Monuments (1 approx. every 300 ft) 7 EA $ 200.00 $ 1,400.00 Roadway ltems Sub-Total $ 166,450.00 Erosion Control Items 22 Silt Fence 800 LF $ 4.00 $ 3,200.00 23 Rock Construction Entry 280 SY $ 16.00 $ 4,480.00 Erosion Control Items Sub-Tota! $ 7,680.00 SUBTOTAL of ALL ITEMS $ 205,020.00 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 12,485.72 Sub-Total including inflation $ 217,505.72 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 239,300.00 Inspection 24 Inspection of Drainage Facilities 1 LS $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 25 Inspection of Roads 1 LS $ 6,050.00 $ 6,050.00 InspecfJon Items Sub-Total $ 7,300.00 SUBTOTAL of ALL 1TEMS $ 7,300.00 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 444.57 Sub-Total inc/uding inflafion $ 7,744.57 INSPECTION TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 8,500.00 GRAND TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 247,800.00 03/19/03 10:35 FAX CLC Associates. Inc. Q001 ~ ► 707 W. 7TH Ave. F A X C O V E R 5 HEE T sutTE Zoo SPOKANE OENVER WAsMtN6T0N 99204 P 509 450 664o SPOKANE F 509 456 6644 $ALT LAKE CITY CLC A550CIATE5 y , ATTN: \ nIQ~Qrrl DATE_ COMPANY: FROM: ~~~(Y1~~ ~1 ZI _ LOCATION: PROJECT: PRDJECT F~: 1 ~ ~ NUMBE R. ~Q ~ ~ - w ORIGINAL D0CUMENT TO: FOLLOW VIA F06LOW VIA ,REMAIN W1TH , FOLLDW VIA MA1L DVERNIGHT , 6ECOND DAY COMMENTS: . ~ ~ TOTAL PAGES INCLUDING COVF-R THE DOCUMCNT(9) ACCOl+IPANYING TH's FAX TRAN6M16610N CONTAlIVL91 INF0RMA710N, WHICH 16 CONFIOCNTIAL- at`1D PRNIL6GED_ T}il6 INFORMATIGN I9 INTENDEO TU 96 FOA THE U6E OF THE 1NC{VID1,JAL OR EKTITY 6CT FORTH ABQVF- IF YGN ARB N13TTHE I►`ffENGED REGIPfEIYT, ANY OISCI-OSLlRE, COPYIN6. OISTRIBLITION OR U6E CF TME CONTENTS OF TNIB INFORMATION 16 PRQHI69TED. THANIC YOU. 03/19/03 10:35 FA% CLC Associates, Inc. IM002 ,LC A5SOCIA'TES .uantity Esjamate ~ 'IN 19-Mar-03 Filc: J:\Documcnt\s020134\Quantity Esdmatc Shclley Lake 4th addirion 020134 _ • , ITEM NO• ITEM UNI'' QUANTI'TY DRAIl~TAGE I'fEMS M I lIDcywell - Type A(complete) EA ~ 1 21 Drywell - Typc B(complctc) EA ~ j IType 4 IVletal Solid Gratc an.d Frame EA ~ 6 3~ Con crete Inlct, Type 2 EA 0 4~Concrete Inlet, Type 1 EA 2 iMctal Frame and Grale EA 2 51 Catch Basin - Type 1 EA 0 61WSD0'f 48" Cstch easin, Type 2 EA ~ I 71 Curb In1et - Typc 1 EA N 7 81 "Ituu Sidcwalk Inlet - Type 2 EA ~ 0 9~Pipe, 10" PVC LF 0 lOlPipe, I51' PVC LF 15 11 Pipe, 12" PuC XF 0 12 Pipe, .l 8" P'VC LF 0 131Pipc,10" F1DpE LF ~ 0 141 Pipc,12" HAPE LF 40 , 141 Pipe, 15" HDPB LF 0 15 IPipe, 18" IiDPE LF ~ 0 161 Pipe, 24" HDPE LF ~ 0 17lPord Outlet Stucturt JEA 0 18 1 Pond Access Road CY ~ 0 . ] 9 Pand Excavation , CY ~ 425 20 Earth Pond Lincr SY ~ 0 21 jDitch Excavarion CY 0221Topsoil CY . SO ~ 23 1Hyckosccd SF 10000 241 sod sF M a 25 IFiltcr Fabric SY ~ 0 261-kiprap OutfalT Pad C'Y ~ 6 271Relocaie Pencc LF M 0 IROADwAV [TEMS I 1 I Clearing aad Crrubbing • LS ~ 1 21Roadway Excavalion CY ~ 2500, 31Basc Course :CY 1270 , 41rop cour5c cy 1120 5 1 Asphalt Concrcte Pavement, Clnss B TN M 872 61Asphalt Concrete Pavement, Clsss E 'n`1 ~ 0 71Curb ar►d Guttcr, Type Ii LF ~ 0 $1 Ctffb and Gutter, Typc R LF ~ 4300 9 ADf1 Curb Ramv EA ~ 0 10 Sidewalk SY ~ 0 111 Cross-Guner> TYpe 1 SY ~ 0 121WSDOT'Iype 111 Barricade BA M d 13 1 Sttcct Si gns EA ~ 2, 03/19/03 10:35 FAX . CLC Associates, Inc. 1&003 ITEM NOr [TEM tJNIT QUANTITY 141Saiping Z.F 0. 15 jMonuments EA ~ 14 16 ~ Concnte Driveway CY ~ 0 17~Relocate WaterMeter EA ~ 0 18ITcrnporary TrvLffic Control lIS ~ 0 1 91Relocace Mail Box EA ~ 0 201Relocatc UtiliryPole iEa ~ 0 ~ ~ EROSTON CONTROL ITEMS ~ 1lSilt Fcnce ~ LF ~ 800 21Ttock Conswction fintry NSY 280 3 1Straw Balcs LS 0 I I I ~ Subtotal of all Items ~ Grand Total (includcs amulTiQlier of 1.10) T1vsPEC'tION ~ ~ 1 bspection of Drairgge Facilitics ~ $1 s250.00 I 2~Inspection of Roads ~ $3,450.00 S4,700_00 - Mantz, Gloria From: Mantz, Gloria Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 2:33 PM To: 'nprimm@clcassoc.com' . Subject: P1750D Shelley Lake 4th Addition rxr-a P1750D Bond Estimate.xls Nathan, I am attaching the bond estimate for Shelley Lake 4th Addition. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks Gloria Mantz -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Primm [mailto:nprimm@clcassoc.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:41 PM To: gmantz@spokanecounty.org Cc: "susan murphy"@clcassoc.com Subject: Gloria Mantz, P.E., Here is the Bond Estimate for Shelley Lake 4th Addition. thanks, Nathan Primm Intern, CLC Associates (509) 458-6840 nprimmQclcassoc.com Civil Engineering Student, Gonzaga University 1 > J , ~ - ~ ~ NORTHWEST, INC. Geotechnical, Inspections, Materials Testing August 28, 2003 STI Project No.: S030016A City of Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Attn: Mr. John Hohman Re: Shelley Lake 4`h Addition Bond Reduction Request Dear Mr. Hohman: At the request of our client, Shelley Lake Development, we wish to request a reduction of established road construction bonds to a level which is proportional to uncompleted work associated with this project. Having reviewed the construction to this point and the bond estimate prepared by GMM for Spokane County and dated March 24, 2003, we believe the specified road work is approximately 95 percent complete. Our certification of the storm drainage system is withheld pending a redesign to be submitted by CLC Associates. We estimate the value to complete the final work on this project to be approximately $34,000 including all currently specified storm drainage work. We hereby request a reduction of established road construction bonds which are proportional to uncompleted work associated with this project. It should be understood that this certification only implies that the items shown on fihe Record Drawings were substantially built as designed, and only valid at the time the as-built information and visual certification were performed by this firm. It should be noted that this letter does not relieve the contractor or developer from the warranty periods and contractual provisions expressed or implied within their bonding documents. Sincerely, "I have reviewed the STI Northwest, Iac. construction and to my J~'~• N~ knowledge find it to be QQ. O~ W in substantial ~ M . , conformance with the ~ approved certified plans y ' and Standard Bob Graham ~ Specificafions except as Civil Projects Manager . . noted." l cc: STI File ' Y . . . . - l~~. q-03 . . . - , , - ~ . . , . 2214 East Riverside Avenue • Spokane, WA 99202 • Phone (509) 534-9711 • Fax: (509) 534-9755 . . j ' . STl NORTHWESI` , ASPHALT RYCE DENSITY TEST ASTM D 2041 / AASHTO T 209 DATE 7/I4U03 PROJECT NAME S ,y PROJECT rT[JMBER So 3001 6A TYPE OF mmum A SIZE OF SAWLE NUMBER OF SAMPLES ~ TYPE OF CONTAINER _(circle one TYPE A,B,C,DApbr F) . ~ TYPE OF PROCEDURE (circZe one WEIGHT IN WATER, 1VEIGHT IN AIR) A MASS OF SAMPLE, g. 2 0 6 6, a $ MASS OF CONTAINER, g. ~ d I 7► , S c MAss oF covEP., g. I 3 0~ 6 -D MASS OF CONTAINER + COYER + WATER (FULL), g. E MASS OF CONTAINER + SAMPLE + WATER, g. g3 0q. S ~ "V6 ...1p-v c..,..m3 / ft'. ,,.~,..._._...._._..w..m_..._._...._..~...,_..,. .z_~. 4 . G -'VOL-UME-{-~FSAW16E; em'-W- / • _ . H DENSITY OF SA1VII'LE, cm3 / W. [A/(A+D-E)] TES'I' PERFOIZMED AT 25°C +1.7 or - 2.3 °C (+3 or -5°F) no correction needed. See ASTM. VOLUME OF CONTAINER = DENSITY IN PCF (ft) = DENSITY AT «n' x 62.245. (62.43 X 0.997) RECORD DENSITY TO 0.0W «n' NOTES: . . . . TESTED BY: ~//Vi~ CHECKED BY: ~ . REVIEWED BY: . o:SrnFOxM ~ ~ ~ BOND ESTIMATE BOND REDUCTION REQUEST 812711003 Project Name: Shelley Lake 4th Addition ~ ProJect Number. ~ P1150D ~ ProJect Number: S030016A Date: Marc~ 24, 2003 ~ Inspection Date: August 21, 2Q03 ~~ORTHWEST, INC. Prepared by: GMM ~~'~~~,~y Prepared by: Bob Graham • ~ - - ~ ~ Estimated % Estimated $ ~Estimated $ 90% r~le 5 ~tem Descrlptlon ~ ttt~~ _ unit' Unit Price 7ota~ Complete Complete 'Remaining ~ma'ining prainage Items 1 Drywell, Type A~incl. backfill, filter fabnc, ftame & grate) 1 EA $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100A0 0% $ 2,100 $ 2,100 2 Dryweli, Type B(incl. backfill, filter fabnc, frame & grate) 5 EA $ 2,700.00 $ 13,500.00 0% $ 13,500 $ 13,500 3 Concrete Inlet, Type 2 2 EA $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 ~ 0% $ 1,200 ~ 1,200 4 WSDOT Inlet and Grate 1 EA $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300,00 U% $ 1,300 $ 1,300 5 Curb Inlet, Type 1 7 EA $ 75.00 $ 525.00 0% $ 525 $ 525 6 Metal Frame and Grate 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 60U.00 0% $ 600 $ 600 7 Pipe,15-inch PVC 15 LF $ 25.00 $ 375.00 0% $ 375 $ 375 8 Pipe,12-inch CPEP or HDPE 40 LF $ 21.00 $ 84U.00 0% $ 840 $ 840 9 Pond Excavation Incl. Haul 425 CY $ 8.00 $ 3,400.00 0% $ 3,400 $ 3,400 10 Seed, Fertilize and Mulch 10,000 SF $ 0.05 $ 500.00 d% $ 500 $ 500 11 Topsoil 50 CY $ 6.00 $ 300.00 0% $ 300 $ 300 12 Clearing and G~ubbing (1-5 aaes) 3.00 AC $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 0°/a $ 6,000 $ 6,000 13 Riprap for Ditch (6-inc~ minus) 10 CY $ 25.00 $ 250.00 0% $ 250 $ 250 Drainage Items Sub-Total $ 30,890.00 $ 30,890 $ 30,890 RED~SICN OF DRAfNAGE UIVDER REVIEW Roadway Items 14 Rough Grade (sub-grade preparation) 2,500 CY $ 10.00 $ 25,000.00 100% S 25,000.00 $ - S 2,500.00 15 Base Course 1,270 CY $ 24.00 $ 30,480.00 100% $ 30,480.00 $ - $ 3,048.00 16 Top Course 1,120 CY $ 24.00 $ 26,880.00 100% ~ 26,880.00 S - $ 2,688.00 17 Asphalt Conc~ete Pavement 872 TN $ 45.00 $ 39,240.00 l00% $ 39,240.00 $ - $ 3,924.00 18 Curb and Gutter, Type R 4,300 LF $ 10.00 $ 43,000.00 l00% $ 43,000.00 $ - ~ 4,300.00 19 WSDOT Type III Barricade 1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 100% $ 250.00 S - S 25.00 20 Street Signs 2 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00 0% $ - $ 200.00 S 200.00 21 Monuments (1 approx. every 300 ft) 7 EA $ 200.00 $ 1,400.00 6% $ - $ 1,400 00 S 1,400.00 Roadway Items Sub-Totaf 166,450.00 ~ 164,850,00 ~ 1,600,00 S 18,085.00 Erosion Control Items 22 Silt Fenoe 800 LF $ 4,00 $ 3,200.00 100% $ 3,200 00 $ - $ 320.00 23 Rock Construction Entry 280 SY $ 16.00 $ 4,480.00 100% ~ 4,480.00 $ - ~ 448.00 Erosion Contro! liems Sub-Totaf $ 7,680.00 $ 7,680,00 $ - $ 768.00 SUBTOTAL ofAl1 lTEMS $ 205,020.00 $ 172,530.00 $ 32,490.00 $ 49,743.00 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 12,485.72 $ 10,507.08 $ 3,029.35 Sub-Total including rnflafion $ 217,505.72 $ 183,037.08 $ 52,772.35 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL (Includes multlpller of 1.10) b 239,300.00 $ 201,300.00 $ 58,OOO.QO Inspection 24 Inspection of Drainage Facil'~ties 1 LS $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 30°/a $ 375.00 $ 875.00 $ 875.00 25 Inspection of Roads 1 LS $ 6,050.00 $ 6,050.00 90% ~ 5,445.00 $ 605.00 $ 605.00 fnspection ltems Sub-Tota! $ 7,300,00 $ 5,820.00 $ 1,480.00 $ 1,480,00 SUBTOTAL ofALl ITEMS $ 7,300.00 $ 5,824A0 $ 33,970.00 $ 1,480.00 3°k inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 444,51 $ 354.44 $ 90.13 Sub-7ofa! includirtg inflation $ 7,744.57 $ 6,174.44 $ 1,570.13 INSPECTION TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1,10) 3 8,500.00 5 6,800.00 S 1,700.00 GRAND TOTAL (includes mul6plier of 1.10~ $ 147,800.00 $ 208,100.00 $ 59,700.00 d • S oCITIO k#a* e Valle y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cfityhallCspokanevalley.org c . s cs.:...J../ :J•~..i•.e -a..~.4.i~..►. ~ ~ ~ - Fax To: Kerri Schoolcraft From: Rod Pegram Fax: 353-0398 Pages: Z Phone: Date: Re: Letter of Credit, Shelly Lake Dev. Cc: Comments: a 0 Attached is a copy of the original. I notice that the e-mails refer to #2279. The LOC that I have is #22079. If you need anything else call me at 688-0025. Thanks, Rodney D. Pegram Development Engineering Inspector ~ J T ~ po ne Valley 11707 E SPrague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org July 1, 2008 Washington Trust Bank PO Box 2127 Spokane, WA, 99210 Re: Shelly Lake, 4th Add. PE-1750-D To Whom It May Concern: Shelly Lake Development, LLC has satisfactorily completed the requirements for Shelly Lake, 4h Addition. The Letter of Credit # 22079 for $2,700.00 can be released in full. If you have any questions, please contact me at 688-0025. Sincerely, o ey D. 4Pegram Development Engineering Inspector City of Spokane Valley Cc: Shelly Lake Development, LLC, 8225 N. Division, Spokane, WA, 99208 Whipple Consulting Engineers, 2528 N. Sullivan Road, Spokane Valley, WA, 99216 Development Engineering Proj ect File COMMUNICATION RESULT REPORT ( JUL. 11. 2008 8:07AM ) ~ * * FAX HEADER: CITY SPOKANE VALLEY f TRANSMITTED/STORED : JUL.11.2008 8:06AM FILE MODE OPTION ADDRESS RESULT PAGE ----------------------------------------------------------------------T----------------------------- 880 MEMORY TX 93530369 OK 2/2 REASON FOR ERROR E- 1 ) H A N C i U P O R L I N E F A I L E- 2 B U S Y E-3) NO ANSWER E-4 NO FAC:S [MI LE CONNI_CTION dt-%cwry~ cw-u V ~ 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spvkane Valtey wA 99206 509_921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhaltoDspokanevalley.org Fax To= Kerri Schoolcraft From: Rod Pegrarn Fax: 363-0398 P$9eS= 2 Phone: Date: Re= Let#er of Cred9t, Shelly Lalck-- Dev. CG: Cornm4Bnts: Attached is a copy of tha original. I notiee that the e-maile refer to #2279. The L.4C that 1 have is #22079. If you need anything else call me at 688-0026. Thanks, Rodney D. Pegram Development Engineerina lnspector Page 1 of 2 ~ Rodney Pegram From: Rodney Pegram Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:46 AM To: John Hohman Cc: Henry Allen; Ryan Brodwater Subject: FW: Shelly Lake 4th Addition, PE-1750 FYI From: John Saywers [mailto:johnsaywers@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:45 AM To: Rodney Pegram Cc: 'Gianna Adams'; bheitman@earthlink.net; 'Steve' Subject: RE: Shelly Lake 4th Addition, PE-1750 Rod, I will meet the contractor at the site and relay what needs to be done, would you like to be there also? We will also do the inlet concrete replacement to the east also. When these two issues are dealt with along with the hydro seeding of the drainage ponds are we then complete with this project? Please clarify with John Hohman on this. Thanks for meeting us at the site yesterday and please call with any questions. Sincerely, Saywers Engineering John F. Saywers, P.E. 327 W. 8th Ave. Suite 202 Spokane, WA 99204 Ph.(509)744-0300 Fax (509)744-0304 . Cell (509)869-9378 e-mail johnsaywers@msn.com - - From: Rodney Pegram [mailto:rpegram@spokanevalley.org] . Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 9:06 AM To: johnsaywers@msn.com Cc: John Hohman; Henry Allen; Ryan Brodwater Subject: Shelly Lake 4th Addition, PE-1750 . John, I showed the pictures to John Hohman and also discussed the suggestion that you had made for repair. On the low area, east curb line, removing the curb & gutter between the expansion joints and saw cutting, with removal, of the existing asphalt to centerline of road is acceptable. On the low area of curb and gutter on the west side, grinding of the gutter to allow drainage is acceptable. The city still requires that the manhole be adjusted so that it is flush with the asphalt. Another option for repair of this area would be to remove curb & gutter and asphalt the full width, regrade, lower the manhole, and replace the curb & gutter and asphalt. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely 9/17/2007 Page 2 of 2 ~ `rr Rod Pegram Development Engineering Inspector City of Spokane Valley 9/17/2007 ~ ~ L • _ , y . ,-►•'F• °N ..1` { ~`h . '~,.i'"`y"' .w:aa Yjw.'~ •}k~ ~r tl=,., t ` ~ • N ~ t°1t'~ ' f t 4r ! , ' .,'M►~y.. ~ y r+ -..q_~ ~ \~..a. ~ t ' ~1 ~ ~ s~~,,,. ! ' ~ - 1~ • • - ~ - ~ - . . . • ~ _ J~ . . . . . ~t a ~ . . ~ . } . _ . . ~ "i . . . , 4. a . . . . . . _ . . ~ ,a. ' . , ~ , . ~ • r ~J ~ . ~ ~~A, . 1 . ~ - , r: . 6 ' . • - . . . ' ~~y,y _ _ l.. ~ ' K'i F~ ' `•~S~.siC1 ' - , M ~r• ' 750 ..~.o ~ . ~ r~~- - -y-- ~ ~ _ - 7 ~1, ~ ~ ti►s^ I ~ ' Jt P~~I, ~ i - T~ I s42~ , t af,. i N ~i.;.. . . . I ON ~ ' _ ~a r •J , - _4RV; • ~ ~ . - ° , , ' ~`~i~" - ~~F. i ' r € , V . ~ 7 _ ~ • ( I~l.,.' ~ ~ . d/ - • po ~Mlr ♦i~ ~ ~p N - ~,s • y .i ~~1~~lI l~~y h ~ ~ , . . . I, I y b ~I ~ i~ I i ~,P • f` +i~ F ~rf . yr 14 ~ • 'Y: - b { _ v ~ - ~ . ' '•:a~h , w - ~ ' .a F-it • ~~d,' L I r ~i~ i ~ i I d~. ~~~j~ f~,r I ~ 1 ~ * 1 . i ' ' . s~. r ~ . i~i~ ~ 1~ f^ rj~ ~ ~ , _ . , • ~tw' , ~ ~ . , . . . ~ re:'; r' , ' .s~.„'- V ~ . . r . ~~~~'1~' ` ~ '"~,r 1~, 4,1 ~ c .N• . . r'~ ~ ~ - ~t 1~~`.J ~r ~ 6~ x ~~~IE't`'~, ' R• - ~ : ~ b i"~ " *•r" ~ ~ ' I ~ ' , -4~ . ~ - c~ ~ry 4 4 . . , "~~►~i~~~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ` r~ R1~, r ~ `,~9 =a t # . . , .s~l . ~ r 6 . ~ ~7~ r I~~;~~~~ ~ ~•4.~d~~. ~~'~~r ib -~t)~ N` ~-i w.i R y~~~~~ - kR1 F ~ ,,,yyy r 'n A I k s ry~ ♦ iy` 1i ^ ~p~~ M S ~ ~4r , 3 k I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Manti, Gloria From: Nathan Primm [nprimm@clcassoc.com] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:41 PM To: gmantz@spokanecounty.org Cc: "susan murphy"@clcassoc.com ~ County Bond Estimate.xls Gloria Mantz, P.E., Here is the Bond Estimate for Shelley Lake 4th Addition. thanks, Nathan Primm Intern, CLC Associates (509) 458-6840 nprimm@clcassoc.com Civil Engineering Student, Gonzaga University 1 CLC ASSOCIATES Quantity Estimate , . PN ~ 24-Mar-03 Filc: J:\Document\s020134\Quantity Estimate Shelley Lake 4th addition 020134 ITEM NO. 1TEM UNIT QUANTITY IDRAINAGE ITEMS 11 Drywell - Type A(complete) JEA 2 1Drywell- Typc B(complete) JEA 1 5 IType 4 Metal Solid Grate and Frame JEA 1 6 3 1 Concrete Inlet, Type 2 JEA 1 0 41Concrete Inlet, Type 1 JEA 1 2 IMetal Frame and Grate JEA 1 2 5 1Catch Basin - Type 1 JfiA 1 0 61 WSDOT 48" Catch Basin, Type 2 JEA I 1 7 1 Curb Inlet - Type 1 JEA 1 7 8IThru Sidewalk Inlet - Type 2 JEA 1 0 91Pipe, 10" PVC ILF 1 0 lOlPipe, 15" PVC ILF 1 15 11 lPipe, 12" PVC ILF 1 0 121Pipe, 18" PVC ILF 1 0 13 1Pipe, 10" FiDPE ILF 1 0 141Aipc, 12" HDPE ILF 1 40 141Pipe, 15" HDPE ILF 1 0 151Pipe, 18" HDPE ILF 1 0 161Pipc, 24" HDPE ILF 1 0 17 1Pond Outlet Structure JEA 1 0 18 ~ Pond Access Road ICY 1 0 19 ~ Pond Excavation ICY 1 425 20 IEarth Pond Liner lSY 1 0 21 iDitch Excavation ICY 1 0 221Topsoil ICY 1 50 23 1Hydroseed ISF 1 10000 241 Sod ISF 1 0 251 Filtcr Fabric ISY 1 0 261Riprap Outfall Pad ICY 1 6 271 Relocate Fence LF 1 0 IROADWAY ITEMS ~ I 1 IClearing and Grubbing ILS I 1 2 1 Roadway Excavation ICY 1 2500 3 1 Base Course ICY 1 1270 41Top Course ICY 1 1120 5 1 Asphalt Concrete Pavement, Class B ITN 1 872 61Asphalt Concrete Pavement, Class E I1'N 1 0 7~Curb and Gutter, Type B ILF 1 0 S ~ Curb and Gutter, Type R I LF 1 4300 91ADA Curb Ramp JEA 1 0 10 ISidewalk ISY 1 0 ' 11 I Cross-Gutter, Type 1 ISY 1 0 12 ~ WSDOT Type 111 Barricade JEA 1 0 13 ~ Street Signs 1 EA 1 2 . = ITEvI NO. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY ' ' 141Striping ILF 1 0 I S 1Monuments JEA 1 14 16 1 Concretc Dri veway ICY 1 0 171Rclocate Water Meter JEA ~ 0 18 1 Tcmporary Traffic Control ' ILS 0 191Relocate Mail Box JEA 0 201 RelocateUtility Pole JEA ~ 0 JEROSION CONTROL ITEMS 1 I Silt Fence ILF 1 800 21 Rock Construction Entry ISY 1 280 3 1 Straw Bales ILS ~ 0 ~ Subtotal of all ltems ~ ~Grand Total (includes a multiplier of 1.10) J1NSPECTION 1 llnspection of Drainage Facilities $1,250.00 2 ~ Inspection of Roads $3,450.00 ITOTAL ~ ~ $4,700.00 . , BOND ESTIMATE ' - Project Name: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Project Number: P1750D Date: March 24, 2003 Prepared by: GMM COUKI,Y Sept 5,2003 Item Description Bond Reduction Qty Unit Unit Price Total % Retained Drainage Items 1 Drywell, Type A(incl. backfill, filter fabric, frame 8 grate) 100% 1 EA $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 2 Drywell, Type B(incl. backfill, fiiter fabric, frame & grate) 100% 5 EA $ 2,700.00 $ 13,500.00 3 Concrete Inlet, Type 2 100% 2 EA $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 4 WSDOT Inlet and Grate 100% 1 EA $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 5 Curb Inlet, Type 1 20% 7 EA $ 75.00 $105.00 6 Metal Frame and Grate 100% 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 600.00 7 Pipe, 15-inch PVC 100% 15 LF $ 25.00 $ 375.00 8 Pipe, 12-inch CPEP or HDPE 100% 40 LF $ 21.00 $ 840.00 9 Pond Excavation Incl. Haul 100% 425 CY $ 8.00 $ 3,400.00 10 Seed, Fertilize and Mulch 100% 10,000 SF $ 0.05 $ 500.00 11 Topsoil 100% 50 CY 6.00 $ 300.00 12 Clearing and Grubbing (1-5 acres) 10% 3 AC $ 2,000.00 $ 600.00 13 Riprap for Ditch (6 inch minus) 100% 10 CY $ 25.00 $ 250.00 Drainage /fems Sub-Total $ 25,070.00 Roadway Items 14 Rough Grade (sub-grade preparation) 10% 2,500 CY $ 10.00 $ 2,500.00 15 Base Course 10% 1,270 CY $ 24.00 $ 3,048.00 16 Top Course 10% 1,120 CY $ 24.00 $ 2,688.00 17 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 20% , 872 TN $ 45.00 $ 7,848.00 18 Curb and Gutter, Type R 20% 4,300 LF $ 10.00 $ 8,600.00 19 WSDOT Type III Barricade 100% 1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 20 Street Signs 100% 2 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00 21 Monuments (1 approx. every 300 ft) 10% 7 EA $ 200.00 $ 140.00 Roadway ltems Sub-Total $ 25,274.00 Erosion Control Items 22 Silt Fence 100% 800 LF $ 4.00 $ 3,200.00 23 Rock Construction Entry 10% 280 SY $ 16.00 $ 448.00 Erosion Control Items Sub-Total $ 3,648.00 SUBTOTAL of ALL lTEMS $ 53,992.00 • 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 3,288.11 Sub-Tota! including inflation $ 57,280.11 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 63,000.00 Inspection 24 Inspection of Drainage Facilities 100% 1 LS $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 25 Inspection of Roads 100% 1 LS $ 6,050.00 $ 6,050.00 Inspection Items Sub-Total $ 7,300.00 SUBTOTAL of ALL lTEMS $ 7,300.00 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 444.57 Sub-Total including inflation $ 7,744.57 INSPECTION TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 8,500.00 GRAND TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 71,500.00 ~ o BOND ESTIMATE Project Name: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Project Number: P1750D Date: March 24, 2003 ~ Prepared by: GMM ~~COL~ 3R- ti Item Descri ion ort ari Qty Unit Unit Price Tatal 0/c, cre ctke ~ Drainage items 1 Drywell, Type A(inG. badcfill, filter fabric, frame 8 grste) lDO%, 1 EA a 2,100.00 a 2,100.00 2 Drywetl, Type B(inct. backfill, filter fabric, frame 8 grate) 1007- 5 EA a 2,700.00 $ 13,500.00 3 Cancrete Inlet, Type 2 160 7o 2 EA $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 4 WSDOT Inlet and Grate l O6 To 1 EA a 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 5 Curb Inlet, Type 1 7 EA a 75.00 $ 525.00 6 Metai Frame and Grate ~Qo-7o 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 600.00 7 wipe, 15-mch pVC tap -/b 15 LF $ 25.00 a 375.00 8 Pipe, 124nctt CPEP ar HDPE 100 40 LF $ 21.00 b 840.00 9 Pond Excavation Incf. Haul 100% . 425 CY $ 8.00 $ 3,400.00 10 Seed, Ferrtifize and Mulch !d a -ia 10,000 SF $ 0.05 $ 500.00 11 Topsal 50 CY $ 6.00 a 300.00 12 Clearing artd Grubbing (1-5 acres) !D Z0 3 AC $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 13 Riprap for Ditch (6 inch minus) 1 pp T0 10 CY $ 25.00 $ 250.00 Drainage Items Sub-Total $ 30,890.00 Roadway Itema ' 14 Rough Grade (sub-grade preparation) ! o,7o 2,500 CY $ 10.00 a 25,000.00 15 Base Course , o t~ , • 1,270 CY $ 24.00 $ 30,480.00 16 Top Course t6~ , 1,120 CY a 24.00 $ 26,880.00 17 Asphalt Concrete Pavement ~ze - 872 TN $ 45.00 $ 39,240.00 18 Curb and Gutter, Type R zo ~'v 4,300 LF $ 10.00 $ 43,000.00 19 WSDOT Type III BaRiCede 10070 1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 20 Street Signs I oo 2 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00 21 Monuments (1 approx every 300 ft) 107.0 , 7 EA $ 200.00 $ 1,400.00 Rosdway ltems Sub-Total a 166,450.00 Erosion Control ttema 22 Silt Fertce ~ pp Ya 800 LF a 4.00 $ 3,200.00 23 Rock Construction Entry lo '~0 280 SY $ 16.00 $ 4,480,00 'Erosron Contr+v! Items Sub-Total $ 7,680.00 • SUBTOTAL of ALL /TEMS $ 205,020.00 ~ 396 irMation from year 2002 to 2004 a 12,485.72 ~ ~ Sub-Total mcluding inflation $ 217,505.72 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL (includes multlplier of 1.10) i 239,300.00 ; i ~ Inapsction ~ 24, Inspecfifln af Drainage Facilities 1 LS $ 1,250.00 a 1,250.00 25 Inspection of Roads ~ 1 LS $ 6,050.00 $ 6,050.00 ~ Inspection Items Sub-Totsl a 7,300.00 , ~ SUBTOTAL of ALL ITEMS $ 7,300.00 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 a 444.57 Sub-Total irtcluding inflatbn $ 7,744.57 IPlSPECTION TOTAL (includes multiplfer of 1.10) : 8,500.00 GRAND TOTAL (includes mutflplier of 1.10) $ 247,800.00 i ~ • BOND ESTIMATE ~ . Project Name: Shelley Lake 4th Addition Project Number: P1750D Date: March 24, 2003 ~ i Prepared by: GMM SPO~ COURTY .e • ~>..~r .,j - ''3~'r ~ _ 'y t~: ><:s Y•ryoy~t4. ?%~T•t°i ' ~ *%•7Y r-Pncn.e8-n ,,w_~,r?.,, ."'•`:~Total_ Item Deser~iption - ~ ~.Qt~y Uni,t„~~Unitz!.. Drainage Items 1 Drywell, Type A(incl. backfill, filter fabric, frame & grate) 1 EA $ 2,100.00 $ 2,100.00 2 Drywell, Type B(incl. backfill, filter fabric, frame & grate) 5 EA $ 2,700.00 S 13,500.00 3 Concrete Inlet, Type 2 2 EA $ 600.00 $ 1,200.00 4 WSDOT Inlet and Grate 1 EA $ 1,300.00 $ 1,300.00 5 Curb Inlet, Type 1 7 EA $ 75.00 $ 525.00 6 Metal Frame and Grate 2 EA $ 300.00 $ 600.00 7 Pipe, 15-inch PVC 15 LF $ 25.00 $ 375.00 8 Pipe, 12-inch CPEP or HDPE 40 LF $ 21.00 $ 840.00 9 Pond Excavation Incl. Haul 425 CY $ 8.00 $ 3,400.00 10 Seed, Fertilize and Mulch 10,000 SF $ 0.05 $ 500.00 11 Topsoil 50 CY $ 6.00 $ 300.00 12 Clearing and Grubbing (1-5 acres) 3 AC $ 2,000.00 $ 6,000.00 13 Riprap for Ditch (6 inch minus) 10 CY $ 25.00 $ 250.00 Drainage Items Sub-Tofa! $ 30,890.00 Roadway Items 14 Rough Grade (sub-grade preparation) 2,500 CY $ 10.00 $ 25,000.00 15 Base Course 1,270 CY $ 24.00 $ 30,480.00 16 Top Course 1,120 CY $ 24.00 $ 26,880.00 17 Asphalt Concrete Pavement 872 TN $ 45.00 $ 39,240.00 18 Curb and Gutter, Type R 4,300 LF $ 10.00 $ 43,000.00 19 WSDOT Type III Barricade 1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 20 Street Signs 2 EA $ 100.00 $ 200.00 21 Monuments (1 approx. every 300 ft) 7 EA $ 200.00 $ 1,400.00 Roadway Items Sub-Total $ 166,450.00 Erosion Control Items 22 Silt Fence 800 LF $ 4.00 $ 3,200.00 23 Rock Construction Entry 280 SY $ 16.00 $ 4,480.00 Erosion Control Items Sub-Tofal $ 7,680.00 SUBTOTAL of ALL 1TEMS $ 205,020.00 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 12,485.72 Sub-Total including inflation $ 217,505.72 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 239,300.00 Inspection 24 Inspection of Drainage Facilities 1 LS $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 25 Inspection of Roads 1 LS $ 6,050.00 $ 6,050.00 lnspectron ltems Sub-Total $ 7,300.00 SUBTOTAL of ALL 1TEMS $ 7,300.00 3% inflation from year 2002 to 2004 $ 444.57 Sub-Total including inf/ation $ 7,744.57 INSPECTION TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 8,500.00 GRAND TOTAL (includes multiplier of 1.10) $ 247,800.00 Page l of 3 a c ' AIlan Jackson From: Allan Jackson Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 12:46 PM To: Alysa Wiyrick Cc: John Hohman; Wayne McGavran Subject: Updated surety inspection information Alysa, Listed below are status updates for 8 projects. We will update the surety inspection spreadsheet accordingly unless we hear difFerently from you. Two projects, SP1251A and PE 17501), will be marked incomplete and require additional action. SP 611-90 - Single Residence No information pertaining to this project was found in any City of Spokane Valley file locations. It is impossible to do additional research without knowing where or when this construction took place Recommendation - Consider this project closed. SP 1251A - UR 3.5 Single Res. Alteration This project is located on the north side of Valley Way immediately east of Evergreen Road. The only information found in the files was a single 2002 construction plan sheet and several designs for 208 drainage swales. No bonding information, certification package, or record drawings available. All work (ACP paving on Valley Way, sidewalk, curb & gutter, drywells, swales, etc.) appears to have been completed except for seeding the Tract E drainage swale. Construction of a commercial building and two homes has been completed and construction of the remaining residence is almost finished. This project was recently constructed so there should be more information available. Is the main portion of the file located somewhere that we (and Julie) have not been able to find? Cou1d the information be found under a different file name? Is it possible that Simpson Engineers has the missing information? Was a walk-through conducted by John or Sandra? Shouldn't this project require a warranty bond? We will not be able to update the current status of this project and make a recommendation without more information. PE 1414B - Riverwalk 3rd Addition - The construction bond was released on 5/27/99 by Bill Hemmings, Spokane County Development Services Engineer, after Spokane County acknowledged receiving a$2,123.00 warranty bond. This warranty bond was to be limited to one year expiring on 4/20/00. However the actual warranty bond, bond number, or name of the bonding company was not found in the files. A field review noted that the major part of tlie project is now designated private roads. No deficiencies were noted on Indiana Avenue, the only public road within the project limits. Recommendation - Consider this project closed without further action. The warranty bond can be released later in the event it did not automatically expire. 3/9/2006 Page 2 of 3 ~r'~.~ Shelley Lake 4th Addition Bob Graham, STI Northwest Inc, requested a bond reduction on 8/28/03 but no action has been taken on that request. Washington Trust Bank verified the $71,500 construction Letter of Credit is still valid. We could not find that certification package deficiencies noted by Kevin Severance on 12/3/04 have been addressed. We reviewed the punch list developed by John Hohman and Ryan Spidahl, Metro Engineering, on 7/16/04. The current condition of deficient items is described below: 1. Catch basin raised and apron replaced - not done 2. Cracks in curb & gutter - large cracks filled with rubberized adhesive and smaller cracks patched with epoxy. 3. Ponds A& B not finished - Pond A irrigated and seeded. Pond B still has not been final graded or the weeds removed. 4. Pond A has crack in inlet - Crack has been epoxy patched. Cracking noted in several aprons on Pond A but do not appear significant enough to replace aprons. 5. Pond C relocated but not noted on as-builts - Pond C has evidently been constructed opposite Pond D in the undeveloped area. Both ponds have only been rough-graded. It also appears the size of Pond C will be decreased if Shelley Lane is extended. John Hohman requested a new drainage plan to be submitted but no record in files that this has been done. The developer may be waiting before finishing the ponds since housing construction is still ongoing adjacent to the unfinished ponds. Recommendation - This construction is all on private roads. Does the City of Spokane Valley have an interest in roadway construction in addition to the 208 ponds and will a warranty bond be reyuired? In any case the redesigned plan for Pond C should be submitted and the punch list items resolved before reducing or releasing the surety bond. Please let me know if there is more that we can do to speed up the process. The following files were not found either downstairs or across the street. We even had Julie check to make sure we didn't overlook them. PE 1339 - Alcott Grove Addition File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1984 and released in 2001. Consider this file closed since no other information available. PE 981- Southern Mobile Home Park File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1980 and released in 2000. Consider this file closed since no other information available. PE 1345 - Kirken Guthrie/Carpenter File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1985 and released in 2001. Consider this file closed since no other information available. PE 1649F - Evergreen Pt. 6th Addition 3/9/2006 Page 3 of 3 w f File not located. According to spreadsheet bond was issued in 1991 and released in 2000. Consider this file closed since no other information available. I'll work on the Valley Pines legal letter and have it ready for you to review tomorrow. Allan Jackson ~ 3/9/2006 -