The URL can be used to link to this page

27874 ENGINEERS REVIEW P:197~092I7~~~PPL Thu Fe~ D6 i5: 15: ~3 i997 - ~,~.~.e., ~ , ~ ~ ,a ;~s t~ ~ `4' "i` I.~ S:i . F ~ ~ \ ~ / y r , ~ ~ . , ~ ~,~Q ~ ~ ~ r , ~ \ t`~~ e \ ~ r ~ J~ ~ Sf r ~f f ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ A ~ ~ f/ ~ NOE'40K~ #G~.~ ~ m.~~_, fi1~ ~ ~ e2' 95 GS' ~ ~ ~ 1o1S ~ ~ ~ q.~ R~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ r eY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ , I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` 4 ~ ~ ~ I r ~ ~ ~ a a ~ ~ ~ y~` 1~ s ~ a ~ ~xr ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ P 4~~~~ ~ ~ ~i1~ 1~7~ ~ ~ y '~"t 1~9• ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ; • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~u ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g" + ~ ~ ~ I ~ N ~ ~ ~p`Y ` ~ ~ ~ 6 ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~c` ,ar „o° ,~x , ,aa~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r m ~ ~o ~ , ~ ~ ~ - . ~ - ~ - - - ° - - - - m ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ m ~ V . ~ a s i ~ s ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ w # w ~ ~ -~a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k ii~~ I . d. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . u ~i ~ ~ ~w~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ r~ -3 - ~ ~ . ; ~ r ~ I ~ @ l~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ . ~ ~a ~ - ~ r ~ AVENUEII t} • ~ ` ~ 35TH _ . ~ AVENU i 367H 200 RM51 . , 377N _ A ~0G9~ ZONE C ti . \ . • O ~ ~ 407H AVEN , CUJV ` ~ r 1 ~ ~ ~ - ~ , FOREST 3 m . ~ r J ~ J ~ ~ k00 • • WN . ' ZONE C . ~ ~ ~r ~ 0~ J 0 1 ~ ' AVEfVUE ~ ~ 44TN . _ ' M:- 1k; Canceled, ENG1NEER'►? R,J I I EW S HEET Dat~ ~iled Date As Builc Plans Received Date R4ad P1aw Appravad D-R P LL~~ FILE #P~' ~'183,., i~ ~ . ~ New Road, Stamda-rds 5-15-95 Mylac - ~ _ C'o--pa-nion 1~'ile r - - - Hearin Dates H Time. j H Number: Related Fj1e At: L ' ~?~pt . , - - ~I)FtSIG'~i ~1rie,~ Daie: I}IZ '~ir~te: B~d'an Review Wm: 03T 11T ~~~97 R Time: R Nurnber: DESICN REVMW # - . _ . , . Date Recbed; 02I20/1997• Revi6w Type: Large L4t ❑ B1dg. Square T~~st-' Na. Lats: 16 No. ~crxes: 5;97 ~~ojeG4 'aame; S"-'' ~ ~ ~VFN R a-n ge - fio wi i sUp ~ Se o- tzon: 44-25-13 Sifie, Aad 6n:; i~ ~ ~ OWN DR1W, SCHAFERIW ~ISFMAN MICA _ PARLEL(S)s (ftt 20) Applicant- Name: WARD LET.-AND Phbne 624-3141 45333.910$ Applicaat Addle-ss: 1520 W 3RT5 AVE STE 205 Phone 2# F624-3143 SPOKANE WA 99204 Date Cond2dons Ma'iled: Flood ~oj* Yes Water Sa~rce: 4 Sewer Source: I School Dist:.3.56 Fire Disc: 1 Phojie Dist: US WEST .~ill~~~ Name: Qwner: WA~ ~ ~ LB LAND Engi.nees: DtaN~~ ~ ~~~RK Ad'_~ess: - Owner Address: 1524 W 3-RD AVE STE 205 Co.mpay: & CLARX IINC SPOKAI~~ ~A 99244 Aldsess: 172 0 ~ W 4TH, ~~OKA ,NT"L_~ WA M20-4_-1702 P,hone~. Qwues Phone: 624-3141 PlaoQe: (509):747, _ W Fax: (509) 747-$913 Siped Na~~,a $uiilt~~~~~ f,7456-~2205 l Planning, # 456-3675 Contact: JOHN ~~DERS-ON Date Su,~ Desc_ription - r DATE `~Oi-NIGALLx ~OW. LETL [O[T1es - CKlw $ FT~~~~ ~~~~ATME NaT ~~~CALLY caMPLETE - - nAz~ ~ ~ ~ PRIoRITY FEEs RE-cEIV'ED CQ~Y T~~ PLAT FEES CQ1vTFLETED ANiD CdPY fi4 ~ ING 1 ! NOTTC,ET0P _IMLTC, J NOTICE fil? PUBLIC# 1 3 4 6 GOMP~TED- 4R~EDS~~ ~~ONW JA•4~~~~ h-out #2 l'n-out N3 DESIGN DEVT~~ON DATES IN-OUT ,IripQu-C 14, n-out, #5 1n-0ut, #b BO' Q'~~~TMS FQ~ DRAINA'GE, I.~`IEIM GALC~'_ LATED I I ~OND RECE1VED BQND AMOi7NT REGEIVED DATE BOND RE°LEt15E _ DATE 13OND R~DUCED BOND BALANCE He_arin,g' Date Decisi4n Apgr4ved ~enied Conemuod A~~ealetl .$GG Approved T?onied ,~ppeated to Court ApprQVed Drnied Candnuerl; Final~ Pr4ject Status ~~~~~D MYL~,RS TOP~~ ~IT '~~CIMCIAN (S5L) STAViPED 208 ~OT PLANS~ ~~CRETA.R~,' (SANiJ?Y) C,~1 ~ - ~ - I , . > Page 1 yf 1 ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" EXTENSION OF TIME TO: Spokane County Planning Departmen I FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: February 17, 1998 ~ PROJECT: SUNRISE HAVEN FILE PE-1839-97 Hearing Date: Review Date: 02/17/1998 D OF C(03/11/1997) Sponsor/Applicant: WARD LELAND Section Township Range: 33-25-44 Planner: JOHN PEDERSON Technical Review Date: ( @ ) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. The Spokane County Engineer has reviewed the extension of time and has no objection to the request for an extension of time. CC: Applicant i4ARD LELAND Engineer/Surveyor DANIEL B CLP.RK Planner JOHN PEDERSON RECE VED ~ FEB 0 4 1998 ,[~E t~1NEER S P O K A N E C O YJ N BUILDING AND PLANNINC • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JaMEs L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DrttECrox DATE: February 3, 1998 TO: ' Spokane County ivision o tilities; im e Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings, Fire Protection District No. 1 Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston Spokane County Water District No. 3 Central Valley School District No. 356 Spokane County Division of Long Range Planning; John Mercer FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planne RE: Time Extension for issuing a Determination of Completeness for PE-1839-97; Sunrise Haven Enclosed please find the request for an extension of time for determining technically complete status for the above referenced preliminary plat. Our records indicate the application is due to expire on February 1 A840I'`lease r ie Ae e~ensgion request and forward your revie`v comments to me by February 17, 1998. If you ha e any questions, please contact me at 456-3675, ext. 206. kc Enclosure(s) c: Adams & Clark, Inc. c/o Stu Deysenroth, 1720 W. 4`h Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99204 Laurie Grimes, Assistant Planning Director 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVE~WE • SPOKANE, WwsMvGTOtv 99260 PHOM: (509) 456-3675 • FAx• (509) 4564703 TDD: (509) 324-3166 r ~ , Adams & Clark Inc. DANIEL B. CLARK, P.L.S. 9 LESLIE D. KILLINGSWOR7'H. P.E. ChAl Engineers • Land Su►veyors • Land Planners • Landscape Architects STUAR.T A. DEYSENROTH, A.S.L.A. RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY ,january 19, 1998 JAN 3 0 41998 DIVISIUh OF BUILDING & PLANNiNG John Pederson BY' Spokane County Planning Dept. ~ 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Technically Complete Status - Time Extension Request for Preliminary Plat PE-1839-97, Sunrise Haven A&C Project No. 97-012 Dear Mr. Pederson: In response to your letter to me dated January 15, 1998,1 am hereby submitting on behalf of Mr. Ward Leland a request for a six-month extension of time for the above-noted Preliminary Plat application. We are in the process of resolving the items you havE requested to enable Technically Complete status to Mr. Leland's application. Additional time is necessary to coordinate these itcros with his neighbor and finalize other issues such as minor lot and frontage, access easement issues to the adjoinilig property, etc. Please do not hesitate to call me if you need further information or have any questions regarding this matter. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Adams & Clark, Inc. A ~ Stuart A. Deysenrar~LA Principal SnD/LO cc: Ward Leland AC 1720 W. Foui-th Ave. 9 Spokane, N-VA 99204-1702 •(509) 747-4600 9 Fa.t (509) 747-8913 ~ M E M O R A N D U M DATE: February 17, 1998 TO: John Pederson, Division of Building and Planning FROM: Brenda Sims and Katherine Miller, Stormwater Utility RE: Time extension request for PN-1839-97; Sunrise Haven CC: FILE Our files indicate we last commented on this proposal in March of 1997. It would appear to us that adequate time to obtain a Technically Complete Status has already gone by. We recommend denial of this time extension request. C:IWIND0WSITEMPlpn183997a doc Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Friday, February 06, 1998 12:03 PM To: Pederson, John Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Franz, Dean Subject: P-1839-97 - Time Extension Request - Sunrise Haven 2-6-98 I received the above referenced application on Feb. 4, 1998. I have no objection to a six month time extension. Ow rf' ~ Page 1 • • • County Public Works, D • o County • • Memo To: Division Of Building and Planning PLANNER: JOHN PEDERSON From: Pat Harper, Transportation Engineering Supervisor Subject PE-1839-979 SUNRISE HAVEN Review Date: 03/11 /1997 Applicant WARD LELAND Date: March 11, 1997 Re: Technical Completeness Review After review of PE-1839-97, SUNRISE HAVEN, Spokane County Transportation Engineering Section is not requesting the suspension of the technical review of this application. This application is within a 100 year flood zone which should cause some concem from the Development Services Section of Spokane County Engineering. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. • Page 1 CC: WARD LELAND DANIEL B CLARK Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill . Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 1997 8:08 AM To: Pederson, John; Hemmings, Bill Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott; Miller, Katherine; Williams, Tammie Subject: RE: Proposed Preliminary Plat No. P 1839-97 Importance: High It appears that a concept drainage plan will be required for this proposed plat. A final determination can be made after the preliminary geo-hazards report is received and reviewed. From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Monday, March 10, 1997 1:37 PM To: Pederson, John Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott; Miller, Katherine; Williams, Tammie Subject: Proposed Preliminary Plat No. P 1839-97 Importance: High I received the above referenced project application on Feb. 20, 1997. The Development Services Section of Spokane County Engineering has determined this application to be technically incomplete for the following reasons: • There was no "Agreement to Pay Fees" submitted with the application package as required by Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0293, Section .050 Determination of Completeness Paragraph (A) (5). These are the currently adopted administrative rules to implement the requirements that are contained in Substitute House Bill No. 1724, State of Washington. This resolution went into effect on March 31, 1996. The relevant section states the following: "Counter complete status may also include applicable fees and, in the case of the Division of Engineering and Roads, shall include a signed "agreement to pay fees." I believe we are all in agreement, that the existing fee agreement system for reviews, is very troublesome to deal with. I am working with other staff and management in Spokane County Public Works to eliminate these agreements and replace them with a fee of some type that can be paid at the time of application. However, until this can be accomplished, these agreements are needed in order to reimbursement the County Engineering office for the services that our section provides. If we do work on a project that we can not bill, the county road fund loses money that they can use to match with other grant money. Our net loss for each doilar that we can not bill, could be as high as three to four dollars, that could have been used to improve our county roads. Therefore, we will be unable to initiate the review of any of the application materials and any other submittal information until we receive a properly executed, original signature (not copied or faxed) fee agreement. • There was no preliminary geo-hazard evaluation submitted with the plat application as required in Section 11.20.070 (D) (2) Geo-hazard evaluation, Preliminary Report. If the proposal also lies in an area that has a wetland and/or a Fish and Wildlife Habitat, the appropriate mitigation measures and permits, if any are required from other agencies, will need to be obtained as the plat is being finalized. The identified mitigation measures must be considered and used in the preliminary plat layout. The design of roads, utilities, and drainage improvements must properly incorporate any recommended mitigation measures in the preliminary layout and any concept plans that may be required. The Development Services Section of Spokane County Engineering will be unable to properly evaluate any applicable land use application, until this report is received with a valid fee agreement. If the Division of Building 8 Planning's waives the requirement for a preliminary Geo-hazard evaluation and report, we request immediate notification with the reason why such waiver is being granted. We will then continue our review of the application without the above referenced report if we have a fee agreement as stated above. Please inform the project sponsor of these issues as it is our desire to speed up the review process as much as we can. Thank you for your cooperation. Villqewmt.a9a - Page 1 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: March 10, 1997 TO: John Pederson, Division of Building and Planning FROM: Brenda Sims and Katherine Miller, Water Resources RE: PN-1839-97; Preliminary Plat of Sunrise Haven CC: FILE Based on the site plan it appears that the proposal is located either in or near a wetland area. Has this proposal been assessed under the Critical Areas Ordinance due to the wetlands. We would appreciate a copy of the findings so we can submit complete comments. If the site is located outside of the wetland area, the applicant still needs to address what (if any) impacts this proposal will have on the wetlands or visa-versa--what impacts the wetlands will have (if any) on the proposal. The drainage plans will have to incorporate this issue. Basement flooding has been a problem in the area. Enough geotechnical analysis needs to be performed to determine if basements should be allowed in this development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. C:1WI N DOWSITEMP1PN183997.DOC Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Monday, March 10, 1997 1:37 PM To: Pederson, John Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott; Miller, Katherine; Williams, Tammie Subject: Proposed Preliminary Plat No. P 1839-97 Importance: High I received the above referenced project application on Feb. 20, 1997. The Development Services Section of Spokane County Engineering has determined this application to be technically incomplete for the following reasons: • There was no "Agreement to Pay Fees" submitted with the application package as required by Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0293, Section .050 Determination of Completeness Paragraph (A) (5). These are the currently adopted administrative rules to implement the requirements that are contained in Substitute House Bill No. 1724, State of Washington. This resolution went into effect on March 31, 1996. The relevant section states the following: "Counter complete status may also include applicable fees and, in the case of the Division of Engineering and Roads, shall include a signed "agreement to pay fees." I believe we are all in agreement, that the existing fee agreement system for reviews, is very troublesome to deal with. I am working with other staff and management in Spokane County Public Works to eliminate these agreements and replace them with a fee of some type that can be paid at the time of application. However, until this can be accomplished, these agreements are needed in order to reimbursement the County Engineering office for the services that our section provides. If we do work on a project that we can not bill, the county road fund loses money that they can use to match with other grant money. Our net loss for each dollar that we can not bill, could be as high as three to four dollars, that could have been used to improve our county roads. Therefore, we will be unable to initiate the review of any of the application materials and any other submittal information until we receive a properly executed, original signature (not copied or faxed) fee agreement. • There was no preliminary geo-hazard evaluation submitted with the plat application as required in Section 11.20.070 (D) (2) Geo-hazard evaluation, Preliminary Report. If the proposal also lies in an area that has a wetland and/or a Fish and Wildlife Habitat, the appropriate mitigation measures and permits, if any are required from other agencies, will need to be obtained as the plat is being finalized. The identified mitigation measures must be considered and used in the preliminary plat layout. The design of roads, utilities, and drainage improvements must properly incorporate any recommended mitigation measures in the preliminary layout and any concept plans that may be required. The Development Services Section of Spokane County Engineering will be unable to properly evaluate any applicable land use application, until this report is received with a valid fee agreement. If the Division of Building & Planning's waives the requirement for a preliminary Geo-hazard evaluation and report, we request immediate notification with the reason why such waiver is being ranted. We will then continue our review of the application without the above referenced report if we~ave a fee agreement as stated above. Please inform the project sponsor of these issues as it is our desire to speed up the review process as much as we can. Thank you for your cooperation. eife qe.awi.rgo. Page 1 PAGE 1 09:45:58 24 FEB 1997 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 04617 SUNDOWD DR (END) 00.000 SOUTH END TO SCHAFER U 19 PAVED 40 SUNDOWN DR 00.630 SCHAFER RD 01.000 RIDGEVIEW DR (END) 04676 SUNDOWN DR (START) 00.000 WEST END TO FOREST M U 19 PAVED 40 SUNDOWN DR 00.010 FOREST MEADOW DR (EN U 19 PAVED 40 00.050 FOREST MEADOW DR U 19 PAVED 40 00.210 HOLLOW ST & CT U 19 PAVED 40 SUNDOWN DR (END) 00.320 BOWDISH RD U 19 PAVED 40 2 Records Processed ~ ~ S P O K A T7 E ' C O U~T T Y E . . DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINC AND PLAIVN(NG • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JAmES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR . . DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby . Spokane County Stormwater Utility;' Steve Worley Spokane County Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Wyn Birkenthal Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Glen Miles Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 RECEIVED Central Valley School District No. 356 Spokane County Water District No. 3 FEB. 20 1997 FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planneru(,l)P ~U Sf Ce~Y E~aeeriag ~ DATE: February 18, 1997 RE: PN-1839-97; Preliminary Plat of Sunrise Haven .f The Spokane County Division of Building & Planning accepted the above-referenced preliminary plat as a"counter-complete" application on February 11,1997. Acceptance of the preliminary plat application and designating said application as "counter complete" vests the application for review with respect to current regulations and for review to determine technically complete status. The County now has 28 calendar days to circulate application to affected agencies for their review. Additional information may be requested by affected agencies allowing the County to determine if the application is technically complete. If additional information is requested, the 28 day time period will be suspended until adequate information is received. For this application, the "design review" process will not be utilized and your specific review comments are requested within 28 calendar days from February. 11, 1997. The 28 day calendar day comment period ends on March 11, 1997. Please forward your review comments or requests for additional information in the form of inemorandum or letter to John Pederson. If you have any 9uestions regarding the application and review process, please contact John Pederson at the Division of Building & Planning at 456-3675. . c: Ward Leland, Applicant Laurie Grimes, Assistant Planning Director, Division of Building & Planning 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTOIJ 99260 I3UILDING PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • Fax: (509) 456-4703 P[.ANNING PHONE: (509) 456-22U5 • FAx: (509) 456-2243 TDD: (509) 324-3166 • . . ' S P O K A N E a , C O U N'T Y DEPARTMENT OF BU1LDiNG AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLiC WORKS DEPARTMENT JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR February 18, 1997 Ward Leland 1520 W 3' Avenue #205 Spokane, WA 99204 • Subject: Vesting of Type III Application (PE-1839-97: Sunrise Haven) Dear Mr. Leland: This letter is to inform you that your appfication PE-1839-97 for the preliminary plat of Sunrise Haven has been deemed `Counter Complete.' Acceptance of the preliminary plat application and designating said application as 'Counter Complete' vests the application for review with respect to current regulations and for review to determine technically complete status. The County now has 28 calendar days to circulate the application to affected agencies (i.e.: County Engineering, Health District, etc.) for their review. Additional information may be requested, allowing us to determine that the application is technically complete. If additional information is requested, the 28 day time period will be suspended until adequate information is received. Once the application packet is deemed technically complete, a'Determination of Completeness' will be issued to you. Within,14 calendar days of issuance of the `Determination of Completeness', a`Notice of Application' will be sent to: the applicant, all property owners within 400' of the project site and within 400' of any abutting lands owned by the applicant, county reviewing agencies, other agencies with jurisdiction (SEPA), any organization that the county has an agreement to coordinate development applications with, and any other person that may be affected by the application or that has requested notification. . At least 15 days prior to the public hearing, a'Notice of Hearing' sha11 be sent to ail those that received the `Notice of Application', the site needs to be posted, and a legal notice is sent to the newspaper. Specific details about the contents of the notices and other requirements of the 'Notice of Application' process and the `Notice of Hearing' process are contained in Resolution #96-0293, "P.rocedural Administrative Rules Prepared to Implement ESHB-1724." Please call me if you have any questions. My direct line is 324-3206. I look fon►vard to working with you on this project. Sincerely, John W. Pederson . Senior Planner c: Laurie Grimes, Assistant Planning Director, Spokane County Division of Building & Planning Adams & Clark, 1720 W. 4th, Spokane, WA 99204 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BUILDING PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703 Pt.ANNIHC PxoNE: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243 TDD: (509) 324-3166 ~ _ . SP014CANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING P.I:ZT!;LIMINARY SUI3nl:VTSYON A1'PLICATION 1'AlZ'1' 1 A. CENEIRA1, INFOIZMA'f10N: NAMC Or nl'1'LIC/1NT/RT:I'R[?Sl:N'1'ATivr: Ward Leland MnIt..ING ADQRESS: 1520 W. 3rd Ave., Suite 205 CI't'v: Sookane s'rn'rF: . WA z11': 99-2D-4 . I'I-IONI:: 624-3141 (~vc~rk) (home) I~AX: 624-3143 1F Af'f'IACANT IS NnT OWNrR, INC1.Unf WRI'fT1:N 0WNr12 AU'1'110121ZA'f10N FO1i AI'PLiCAN'f TO SERVF. AS ItRI'ItESCN'fA'1'1V1:. I_E'Gn►. owNriZ's NAMr: Ward Lejand Pf-toNE-: 624-3141 fv1A1LING ADDRCSS: 1520 W. 3rd Ave., Sui te 205 C!'rY: Spokane STA•i•r: WA 7.1P: 99204 I'RO.fI?CTi1'110110SAL SI"1'E A1iLA (acres or sq. ft) , 5. 97 Acres AIaJACL'•N"f ARLi1 OWNE-D OR CONTROL1.LD (acres or sq. ft.) None nSSt:SSOR f'/1RCI7.1. u's oi'i'RoJcc'rirRot'osnI. 45333.9108 nssrssoiz Pnizcci, ii's oF nnJnC[.NTniii:n OWNE-1) OR CONTrtoi.i.cD N/A STRrr:.'i' nDlaRESS oI-'I'ROI'OSnL Extensi on..of Sundown Dri ve C-xisI'INC zoNr_ cLnssir•icnTIoN(s) (nKrr_ csTAIII.isi1r:1)) UR 3.5 EXISTING USC OF-I'ROPL'•R'I'Y 1(,ari nt COMI'lZE-I-I(:NS1VC PLAN C/1TC`GORY ~Irh~n SC(-IOOL DtSTRIC"t' Central Val 1 ey , rlttC DIS"1'RtC"r' Fire District No. 1 wA`['Ctt PURVL'YOR S. C. Dist. No. 3 I'R01'OSEU USE OF ('ROPCR7'Y: Sin61e family clwcllings ( ~X [)upIcxcs ( ) Multifamily cSwellinbs ( ) Nlaiiufactureci homes ( ) llusitiess ( ) Industrial ( } Mixecl Use ( ) Olher ( ) - Describe: LIS"f t'ltl:v(OUS I'LANNING AC"I'IONS INVOLVING THlS i'ROf'f:R"I'Y: None known except rezoning by Spokane County ' 11. l,r.CAi, INroiiMA'I'ION: I.oCn'rtoN oI-'PttoPOSnI_: Southeast extensi on of Sundown Dri ve i n Ponderosa area st---C'I'IOtv 33 'I'owNS1-1111 25. RANGE 44 NnML OF 1'UC3LlC ItOAU(S) f'ROVIDiNG ACCI'--SS: SundOwn Dri Ve WID"t'l-I Of PROPLR"fY C'ItON'1'ING ON PU(3LIC: ROAD: Approximately 350' OJOCA r~~I~l~l~ItlAl~ OR I'I~ANNrf~ AR"'ERI11L O YI:S ) NO DOL:S'CI-IE PRO{'OSAL 1-IAV1: ACCE!W y NAME(S) OF AR"I'f-_itlAl, ItOADS IndirPCtlov -ye.s., to SchaefferrB.d. & Di shman-Mica Hwy. I,EGAL nE-SCRII''{'{ON OF 1'1t01'ERTY (Attnch lesal (lescription with saurce o(' Ie6al clearly indicatecl.) lNCI.UDC I.I-.-GAL DLSCItIP'I'ION FOfiee a~ttac ied r0 i3E SUDDIVIDCD ON I'RLI~IMINAltY SUfi1~IVISION MA('. 5 ~ . . ,y. , i SU13D1VISION A1'1'LICA"CION ~ Page 2 of `t Ir YOU DO N07' I-IOLD '1'ITLr 'f0 I'ROl'CR`I'Y, WI-InT IS YOUR INTCItfST IN IT? WI-(AT ARE T(-IC C{•IANGCD CONDITIONS Or T1-IE ARC/1 1V1-I1CH YOU rLCL MAKE T1-11S ['ROI'OSAL WARRANTCD? Market condi ti ons warrant the p1 atti n,g of tLe si te pursuant to its existing UR 3.5 zoning. WHA"1' IMPAC'I' WII.L "1'I•I!: I'ROPOS[:D SUBDIVISION FIAVI: ON 1'I•1I: AU1ACr'N"1' ('ROf'I:RTiI:S? ~ None. wI-inr rACTOrts sUPPoR'r THc suaDIvisIoN? Exi sti na si nal e f ami 1 v devel ooment adjacent to the west & further removed to the nort'-h, south, &`ast. wHn•i' MEASURi:S DO YOU f R ros ~:ro Mi~ric ~~e Yoviz i~rzorosn~'5 I~v1I'~C"(' QN SuItttouNDING ~.nND ust:? ~omp~"i ance wi ~h zoni ng code s anaar s, e. , setbacks; compl i ance wi th requi recfTat si ze &-tronflage, etc. 5ee SEPA-Thec k-li sf-. C. 1'It1aL1MINARY SUBDIVISION GrNri2At, [NFOtZMATiON: NUMI3ER OF LOTS: 16 GROSS ARE-A: 5.97 Acres "1'Yi'ICAL LOT S1ZG: 12y60JO f'ROl'OSGD NET DfNSI'1'Y*: 2.6 Cre SMALLEST LOT SIZC: 10,0g~1 iv11NiMUM fRONTAGE: , $0 fppt ('ROf'OSCD SOURCC OF WATLR: lilcliviclu'll wclls O Public system (X ) I'rivate Coiiuiiwiiry System O OUier ( ) - Describe: PROPOSED MCANS Or SGWAGE DISPOSAL: i'ubiic smer O Community system O Sertic tank and drainfielcl 0() Douhle i'lumbin6 ( ) Dry Sewcr ( ) Otlier ( ) • ~ Describe: ~ U"I'!LI'1'Y COMPANIES AND/OR UIS'T'RIC'f'S TO 1111OVIDf SrItViCE"f0 TI-11S I'ItOPOSAL: Clectricity: WWP Sewer: Indi vi dual systems Gas: WWP Water: S. C. Di st . No. 3 Phone: US West DO YOU, OR 'fl-Ir OWNCR IN 'f1-IC CVCN"C YOU DO NO'(' OWN 'I'I-IIS f'ROI'Clt"fY, IlAVI:- ANY I'LANS FOIt FUTU(tr AI)DI'I'IONS, LXI'ANSIONS Olt FUR"Cl-lClt AC"flVl"CY 1tELA"I'1?D "!'O'I'I~IIS I'120POSAl.? Yes O Na (X) lF YES, CXl'1..AIN: 1). I'1trLIM1NA1tY SUBDIVISION IMl'ItOVEMENT INrORMA'I'ION: LC:VEL`OF STRECT IM('ROVCMfN•rs PRoPosrD: f'rivale roads O {'ublic roads ( 4 Arterial i•oads ( ) "l'ract X roacfs ( } UfSCRI[3L• ANY COM131NATlON OF ADOVC: 1:S'1'1MA'1'I'--D'I'IME- 1'EItIUD LXPI:C"I'L'U FO(t COMI'LI?TI: ULVrL01'MEN"1' O1:"fl-Ili SU[3C)IVISl4N: ~ Annrnxi matel,y 3~y.ears lS f'I-IASING OC"['1-IC f'(NALIZATION 0F TFIC SUBDIVISION PROPOSCD? Ycs O No (X) IF YCS, SI-IOW ['[•IASiNG ON TI-1E PRCLIMINARY SUDD!ViStON MAP OR PROVIDC SCPARATr I'I-IASING 1'LAN. IS DEDICATION OF I.AND I-O(t 1'Uf3LIC US(; CON'I'C'Mf'LA"I'CD (Parks, sclinols, etc.)? Yes O No O If YCS, DCSCRfDC: * NI:'I' nEINSITY IS UNI'fS OR I.O'fS I'E-R ACItE MINUS f'RIVA"fl? ANn/OR I'U13LlC ROAD AREA. . . . ~ - , r-- SUT3DIVISION AT'1'L1CATION ~ f'age 3 of 4 1'AR'I' 11 . TI-IIS SECTION Of TI-If AI'P[,ICATION WILL PROViDE"f(•IC I3UILDING AND PLANNiNG STAFF WiTI-1 Wltl"t`!'I:N VERIfICA"fIQN Tl-IA'{' Tf-1l'_- AI'PLICANT I•IAS 1-111D PRL'•LiMINARY CONSUL'1'A"1'(ON W1"1'1-1 THE nG1:NClES lDLN'l•Ir•IcD. RCSUL'1'S OF TI-IE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION Sf-IALL 13E INCORI'Oitn'i'i;f7 IN 'I'I-Ir I'ROf'OSAL [3EF0ItC fINAL SUDMITTAL "l'O '1'(-IL I'LANNWG DCPARTMCN"1'. r ; ,IJIq ; DISTRIC r:cT . iSTR TNo. ~ A. TI-IIS PROPOSnI. IS WITI-IIN I-IR~ PItOT li. A171~QUA'I'C AItItANGLMrNTS (I~IAVE) ( VI: NOT) 3CE N MAn~ 'I'O Iv1GE'' OUR NGI:I~S IN I'ROVIDING FOR AN ADCQUA'i"L' WATCR S F-- C'ACILI'fll3S FOR FIRL' ('It0"I'EC"I'ION I'URI'OSCS. C. ItLCOMMENDCD FIRL' I'I.OW: T OR UNAI3l.E 'f0 CAI_CULATl3 NOW 13LCAUSE USC IS NO"I' Ial:F1Nl'I'IVr; AN WILL (3E DETrRMINE-D AT DUILDING PE'RMI'1' AI'I'1_1CA'1'lON "I'IME. 1). ItrQU1REMCNTS INCLUDC: sSiRCf ~IYI~~'r11~v1~ ~~1~kutH F~.~. ~ ,.'l'7'y7 - ~ uRCrriT~.r DA-rr r~RC n►sTRic~ ~ , , V"CM A. SATISrACTORY ARRANGCMCNTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND fIRC fLOW ItGQUIRCMCNTS -400W ((lAVC NO'C) 13EEN MADC. B. RLQUIREMCN"l;S/COMMCNTS: A WATER MPfI N ~xTE NS 10 A/ . V\f I L C.. R~CA U I R~.L . ~ SPoKjiNF_ e-o u n Y YWA-c Ea ~~~~Ze_ or• c~ 2 AA ~j7 t~l S1 f~ 1GT ~1` 3 WATCR DISTRICT COUNI'Y IGNATURC/TITLG ~ J J , A I'ItC'LIMINARY DISCUSSION I-lAS TAKEN PI,ACC AND GCNrRAL RL'•QU(RCMCNTS f OR ROADS AND DRAINAGr HAVL f3rCN DISCUSSfD WI"1'I-1 "1'HC A('('LICAN'I'. A. COMMENTS: - r~ si nnTr COUNTY J i , • A['RL'•LIMINARY DISCUSSION 1-IAS TAKfsN PLACI: AND GCNERAL REQUIRCMf:NTS r017 SU13M1'rf AL OI"t'I-IIS PRO['OSAL (flAVE) I-IAVE NO'') I3C~N SATIS'f1LD. "1-IE DESIGNA"1'ED WnT(:R , I'UItVi~YOR I~OR "'I~IIS Sl"'[: IS ~K►iiOF 00 • 'vl1 N 73 A. COMMI:NTS: CL0k.ALQAjF tOJ 11) A-~P ~~u fZV ~ a LTi qZ SIGNATURG/TITLG A C ~ ~ ^ J J DISTRICT - A{'RE'LIMINA{tY DtSCUSSION f-I . FrtAXlrCE AND GfNERl11. RCQUIRI:MCN'fS FOR SU[3M1"]"I'AI, OI.'i'I-IIS f'ROPOSAL (f-tAVE) (IIAVE NOI')' L'•EN SA'I'1SFiCD. A. C O M M EN T S: P~- h L t ~-a~---~ • ~n.` d~sc~sse~ M~:., LoT s•gt, ~ ~ -~1 'g rL.oU v ~rt"C;1J ' Ult'L/TI ' [~ATE ~ ~ . / UIZVEYOR n I'RI?I,IMINARY DISCUSSION 1•IAS,rnKrN Pi.ACE AND G[:NCRAL REQUIRGMGNTS f'4R "CI-IL'- I'ItOVISION Of PUI3LIC SL'WLIt A(tl: UNDCRSTOOD 13Y 'I'HE- AI'I'LICANT. A. COMMCN'i'S: ULI 0400E2 ~4vrALt Naw,6 t(Zt1 6F_0_9,F512 ~~S i , SIGNATURC/"1'ITI.E ' ' A . . . . . ' SUI3DIV1SlON Al'PLICATION ~ 1'a6e 4 of iI I'AIZT I I I suRVCVOR vrRir•IcA•rioN . i, 'I'l-IE UNDERSIGNCD, A LICCNSCD LAND SURVEYOR; 1•IAVC COMPLCTCD TI-IE, INFORMATION ItL"•QUGSTCD. TI•IE 1'RCLIMINARY P AT 1-lAS BCEN PCtCPARCD DY MC OR UNUCR MY SU('ERV{S10N IN ACCORUANCE WITI-1 TI-IE RCQUI CNTS r TI-I[: SPOKANC COUN7'Y ZONING/SU[3DIVISION 1Z~:GU1_ATIONS AND TI-IL' LAW 1' T'I-IL• S CC OI~ SFII "fON. SIGNED: . DATE: Z-16-97 C l ADnRr_ss: Pi-ioNE: ~D43 -147-460b <~PU Y.~oU - zi r: 1'ART tV (SIGNATURC OF 1'ROPCR't'Y OWNCRS OR I.ETTfIt OF AUTI-10R1ZA1'ION) I, TI-If: UNDCRSIGNED, SWCAR OR ArfIRM UNDER PfNALTY Or PGRJURY THAT TI-1C A[30VL RCSPONSES ARL, MADC TRUTI-IFULLY AND '1'O "i'1•IC DCST OF MY KNOWLCDGC. I FUR'1'I-ICR SWCAR OR AFrlRM THAT 1 AM Tl-IE OWNCR OF RCCORD Of Ti-IC ARCA PROPOSCD FOR "T'I-IE- PR(:VIOUSLY IDENTI['IEq LATID USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT Th{C OWNCR, A17ACi-1ED {-1CREWITi-1 IS WRI"f fEN PERMISSION FRO TI-1 ~ OWNGI U'f[-iOltl"LlNG MY ACTIONS ON H{S/HER DCHALf. SIGNCn: X . DATC: • ADDRCSS: z n4- ,CI-~ . I'I-IONE: ~ 2-4 - 3/ ~ krk,...9 , 0\4 qqZa~l z»: 99zD~f v tA S NA^I kt"at CU~ i U ~ EP2~S ~ti11~ M E ~6~1tU~► 6 T~i pd.~ • A x SIGNATURC OF At'P[.ICANT OR ItGf'RESENTA1'(Vi: DA`CG S`i'/1TC OF WASI-IINGTON ) ) ss: COUN`('Y Of SPOKANC ) S{GNCD AND SWOftN OR AFf'IRMrD BCrO1tC MG ON TI-lIS /h ~ DAY OF 1997, [3Y Le1-,ArJ o 1 • HV'I'A RY S L1l 1. 7 Notary PuUlic in anci for the Stnte f Washingtan Itesidinb nt: 0- v2_~(~ f ,EI . My appointmetit expires: I'ART V ('f0 i3[: COMPI.CTCQ DY THC DIVISION OF BUILDING AND i'LnNNING) Dl1T': SU13M117ED. / II r/VV I-- / / nATC ACCf PTCD• D1': _ r 0 To-rnL rci.s: DANIEL B. CLARK, P.L.S. ~ Adams & Clark, Inc. LESLIE D. KILLINGSWORTH, P.E. Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Land Planners • Landscape Architects STLJART A. DEYSENROTH, A.S.L.A. February 10, 1997 LEGAL DESCRIPTION For Sunri-se Haven PARCEL A Prepared by Adams & Clark, Inc. based on Quit Giaim Deed recorded under Auditoes File Number 7410160122, Deed of Personal Representative recorded under Auditors File Number 7708240225, Statutory Warranty Deed recorded under Auditors File Number 8009180214, and Record of Survey recorded under Auditor's File Number 7709020084. That portion of the SW1/4 of Section 33, Townsiiip 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: • BEGINNING at the west quarter comer of said Section 33, being the northwest corner of that parcel conveyed by the Quit Claim Deed recorded under Auditors File Nurriber 7410160122; thence N89°26'06"E 353.10 feet to the northwest comer of that parcel conveyed by a Deed of Personal Representative recorded under Auditors File Number 7708240225; thence SO0°00'00"W 738.23 feet to the southeast comer of that parcel conveyed by said Deed of Personal Representative; thence continuing SO0°00'00"W 90.59 feet; thence S89°26'06"W, parallel with the north line of said SW1/4, 89.02 feet; thence N46°22'31"W 129.96 feet to a point on the south line of that parcel conveyed by said Deed of Personal Representative; thence N49°51'54"W 222.35 feet to a point on the west line of said SW1/4; thence N00°00'00"E, along said west line, 212.87 feet the most southerly corner of that parcel conveyed to Spokane County by Statutory Warranty Deed recorded under Auditors File Number 8009180214, being a point on a 50.00 foot radius nontangent curve to the 1eft, the center of circle of which bears N43°00'S3"W; thence along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 93°58'14" 82.00 feet to a point on said west line of the SW1/4, and being the most northerly comer of said parcel conveyed to Spokane County; thence N00°00'00"E, afong said west line, 307.24 feet to the POiNT OF BEGINNING, containing 5.97 acres. B. c~ . 4 ~wa . ~ Z 9~ ~~NAI lAP1O S A~ EXP1RES 4 ~ F 1720 W. Fourth Ave. 0 Spokane, WA 99204-1702 •(509) 747-4600 0 o~"" ' ~ ~ ~ ` SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING P:REi LIIVIINARY SUBDIV:[SION APPLICATION 1' A 12"I' I A. GEN[;IZAL INt+OItMA'i'IUN: - NAME OF nf'I'LICnNT/RG('R(sSEN7'A"1'IVC: Ir,ard Lg1anc1 Mn1LING ADDRCSS: 1520 W. 3rd Ave., Sui te 205 . CI"1'Y: Sbokane STA"fl.: . WA Z«': gg2D~4 . PI-IONC: 624-3141 (work) (home) FAX: 624-3143 ir APf'LiCANT IS NOT OWNCR, INCLUDC WRI'TTCN OWNI;R AUT[-1O121ZAT14N F01t A1'PLICANT TO SERVi; AS RrPRI;SCN'I'A'TIVI:. LEGAI.OWNEIt's NA►vtC: Ward Lel and PHONE: 624-3141 lv1AILiNG ADDRCSS: 1520 W. 3rd Ave., Sui te 205 ct'rY: Spokane s'i'n'rr:: wA z1P: 99204 ~ i'ROJECT/I'ROI'OSAL SITC AItEA (acres or sq. ft) 5.97 Acres nD1ACEN"f AREA OWNCD OR CON"fROLLrn (acres or s(l. ft.) None nssr_ssoR PnRcI:l_ rl's oF PRoJccTirROPasni. _ 45333.9108 nssr-.ssoit rnizcrI. !I'S OF AD1ACI:N'I' nltE-n OWNLD OIZ CON"f'IZOLLI:O N/A STRCCT ADDRESS OF-PROPOSAL Extensi on of Sundown Dri ve I:XISTING ZONC CLASSIFICATION(S) (Dn'I'(: I.S"t'Af31.IS1-IL'•U) UR 3.5 CXISTING USE Or t'ROPrR'1'Y IjA-ant COMPRCI-ICNSIVG PLAN C/1TCGORY ~Irhan SCI-IOOL DISTRICT Central Val 1 ey TIRC D(S"I'RICT Fi re Di stri ct No. 1 WATCR t'URVL'YOft S. C. Di st. No. 3 1'ROi'OSEU USC Or ('ROPCR"I'Y: Single family dwcllinbs ( ~X O11111cxes ( ) Mu{tifamily cSNvellings ( ) Ivtanufactured homes ( ) 1311si►iess ( ) 1»clustria{ ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Olher ( ) - nescribe: , LIS'f I'ltL-V[OUS ('LANNING AC"l'IONS INVOLVING TI-1{S PItO('E(t"I'Y: None known except rezoning by Spokane County 13. LCGAL iNT'OIZMATION: LOCnTION Or PROPOSnt_: Southeast extensi on of Sundown Dri ve i n Ponderosa area sI-_-c'rioN 33 TOWNSI-I1I' 25 RANGE 44 NAME OF f'UBLIC ItOnD(S) I'ItOVIDiNG ACCI.SS: Sundown Dri ve W1D"t'1-1 OF PROPCRTY FRONTING ON 1IU[3LlC ROAD: Approximately 350' DOI:S T1-IC ['ROI'OSAL 1-iAVL ACCC~S~~O~ r~~l~"~l~.JtiAL OR f'I~ANNCD ARTER(AL O YI~S ) NO ,Y NAMC(S) OF AR'1'C[tIAL ROADS tndirer.tlo - vp$$.,, to SchaPffer Rd. & Di shman-Mica Hwy. LGGAL DCSCRIf'TION OF I'ROPrRTY (Attncli legal description with source of legal clearly indicated.) INCLUDC LEGAL D[:SCltfn"f10N FO~ee atttac ied r0 AE SUDUIVIDGD ON PRCLIMINnRY SURnIV(SfON MAP. _46 . ; . ~ SUDDIVISION AI'PLICATION ['abe 3 a(' 4 1'AIZT II . "t'I•!IS SECTION OF 7'I•IC Al'['L1CA7'ION WII.L PItOVIUL 'I'I1G I3UILDING AND PLnNNiNG STAFf WITI-I W(tl"rf'EN VCRIFICATION 'f1-IA'I' T(-!~ APPLICAN'I' I-IAS I-IAD 1'RCLIMINA(ZY CONSUI:I'nTION WI"1'I-I 'I'H1: AGrNCICS [DCN"1'lFIED. RCSUL"CS OF TI-1C I'RCLIMINARY CONSULTATION SI-IALL 1311 1NCORf'0(2A"('L[7 1N "fHr PROI'OSAL DEF'ORC r1NAL SUDMITTAL "I'O "f'1-1E I'LANNING nC('ARTMEN"I'. , MARSHALL1FIRE DISTRICT A. TJ-IIS PROf'OSA1. IS WITHIN FIRC PItOTL'C"1'ION DISTRICI' NO. H. ADLQUA'I'E AItRANGLMENTS (I-IAVE) (HAVI; NOT) l3rL'N NinnE TO N1EE1' OUIZ Nt:EDS IN YROVIDING fOR AN ADEQUATL W-Al'C'R SYS"fEM AND FAC(Lt'I'II:S FOIt fIRL ~ f'RO'TEC"fION 1'UitPOSCS. C. ItL'COMMCNDED rIRE fLOW: ; OR UNA[3LC "CO CALCULATC NOW C3ECAUSC USE fS NOT DCr1NITIVE; AND W1t.l. i3C DCTERMINCD AT DUII.nING PERMI'1' AI'PLICA"1'ION "fIMC. I). RCQUIREMENTS INCLUDC: FIRC DtSTRICT SIGNATURC/TITLC DAT~ . WATE L, 7UR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGCMCNTS rOR DOMfSTIC WATCR AND FIRL fI.OW IZGQUIREMCNTS (HAVC) (HAVE NO'i') [3EE-N MADG. 13. RLQUIREMCNTS/COMMCNTS: . WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURC/TfTLC DATC' 1 r J A P17C1.lMINARY DISCUSSION 1-IAS "fAKEN PLACC AND GCNCRAL ItLQUIRGMCNTS f'OR RO/lDS nND DlZAINAGC' !-IAVC f3CCN DISCUSSCn WITI-I THC A('I'L(CAN'f. . A. COMMENTS: 1 e,~ C C.~ . 2 7, ~l -7 SI NA1 C/'I' T : DATC YS A f'RCLIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS 'I'AK[:N PI.ACG AND GCNERAL REQUIRCMENTS FOR SUl3MIrC'AL OF`1'H(S PROt'OSAL (1-IAVC) (HAVE NO']') [3CGN SATISfIED. TI•IC DGSIGNA'I'CD Wn'I'ER I'UItVI_7YOR FOR "I'I•IIS SI'I'E IS A. COMMCNTS: SIGNATURC/TfTI.E DATE ~ E A I'RELIMINAItY DISCUSSION FIAS "('AKCN ('LACC AND GCNCRAL RCQUIREMCNTS !"Olt SUI3M1'I'"1'nl- 01'TNIS f'ROPOSAL (HAVC) (IIAVC NO'i') (3LCN SA'1'ISFICD. A. COMMENTS: SIGNnTURClTITLE DATC E , , n I'ItrI.IMINARY n1SCUSSION IIAS'fAKEN f'LACE AND Gf:NCR/11.. REQUIR[:M[:NTS FOR TI-([: !'ROVISION OF f'Uf3LIC SLWLIt ARI: UNDrItS"1'OOU 13Y 'I'Hl: nl'I'I.ICAN'I'. A. COfviMCN"I'S: SIGNnTURE/TITLE DATE • c`-It . _(1 . - -1 I ( ' ~S / PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT Datc: Number: 1 Name Phonc Address • Commenls: CUSTOMER ROUTING ~ Division of Building & Planning Division of Building & Planning . • 5M1•.L::•:: ~ . • JN:: ::'.tiY:: J::...::..: t.VL•:: :•:::1::: J.1' i JJ:l::: • . ~~-•:llX` ~•lf.•lJ::.. "::•l.til.'f::i..:: •'.L:LL:•.'.\t::: ..1....... ••ll:::'.: ..•.i..::::::::: . :J.~:.' J.~..... ........J.'•:.~'=~~•:::'..:':.~::;;: :•1 . • . . • l _ . . ..........:.YN: i : ••:•1: ::.:::i' i •i :\4 • J Y.... . • . 1• • •....~:.:::.:•Y.'}:::Y.':.':•.•:•.'t:•}:!} '.V:::~~ ~.::.i'f}J.::.~ . ..ti~i ~ . ..1..~...~~.~....... ~ . . • • • ~ .Y ::.::::a'r r:: . ~t:: ~::;':~:~=~:;r..'t • :••r.f rv • .fi .:.4:: Y ::ZN ...v. ~Y{i:~: ~ ~ t : n . . - ~ ~ . : : . ..,.!t~~:Se~E~nu::..:. . ...~..v~ _.........,y._.::~~::.........~::::>:::::::.:. ...~~~~:~::~►~~~~:oi~~~::;:.~.:::::..:::~~:~..:~::::-::~ . , Addressing ~ Admin. Exception i Approach Permit . ~ Building Permit , Arterial Rd Plan Info ~ Flood Piain Permit , Code Information s Binding Site Plan lnfo i Public/Private Roads , Commercial Review , Cert. of Exemption ` Res. Bldg Permit Rev. ~ Conference ~ Comprehensive Plan s Site Drainage Info ~ EnergY Code Info ~ Cond. Use Permit ~ 2~ubdivii.n ' ~ Fire Safety Review = Nonconforming Use i Utility Peanit : Manufactured Home s Permit Review ~ Zone Change Review Mechanical Permits Shorelines Info : ~ ~ ~ • = Other Pcrmits i Shorc Plat Info J10 FEER QUIRED ' "~view~ef ~ Time out ~ Plumbing Permits i Subdivision Info • : ti k.: .v• n•~::.:>:::<;•:::. ••r~:. •.r. ,•::~,r's Private Road Info . { i Temp. Use Permit - ~~:~::::.'irr: Residential Review s Variance Appl. ~ APA Payment . , Sewer Permits ~ Zone Check = Cert. of Exemption Information Zone Info Subdivision Review ~ ULID/Sewer Info Zone Change Eteview NO FEE REQUIRED NO FEE REQU/RED Rcviewer Time out Reviexver Time out Reviewer `('ime ou! n+nsrcRTnssroKi Ct'x 2/16r% , RECEIPT SUNMARY,, t TRANSACTION N[TMBER: T9700226 DATE: 02/10/97 APPI,ICANT: LELAND, WARD W PHONE= ADDRESS: 38 W 27TH AVE SPOKANE WA 99203 CONTAt:'~ 'ilyME: 5AME AS APPLICANT PHONE= TRANSACTION: PRELIM PLAT (ENGINEER'S AND UTILITIE3) DOCUMENT ID : 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) FEE & PAYMENT SiJNIlMARY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT PRELIMINARY PLAT3 - LONG 1 200.00 T,AND USE ACTION REVW 1 100.00 TOTAL DUE a 300.00 TOTAL PAID= 300.00 BALANCE OWING- .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 02/10/97 00000873 7451 300.00 PROCESS)0 BY: MARGARET ALDERMAN PRINTED BY: MARGARET ALDERMAN *~3•k~;,~***********~~~*********** THANK YOU SPOKANE ENVIItONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Environmental Checklist File No. Purpose of Checklist: The State Envimnmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacLc on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide inform,ation to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: . This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of yow proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to ihe questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. .r Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to whicli you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significaant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "dces not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Sunrise Haven Preliminary Plat. 2. Name of Applicant: Ward Leland 3. Address and phone number of Applicant or contact person: Applicant: 1520 W. Third Ave., Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 624-3141 Contact: Stuart A. Deysenroth, ASLA, Principal Adams & Clark, Inc. 1702 W. Fourth Ave. Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 7474600 4. Date checklist prepared: February 7, 1997 5. Agency requesting checklist: Spokane County Planning Department 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): One phase to be developed over approximately three years 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, elcpansion, or fiuther activity related to or connecteti with this proposal? If yes, explain. No b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. No. -2- 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly • affecting the properly covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. County Hearing Examiner approval of Preliminary Plat, building permits, udlity permits, access permit to the existino Sundown Drive, County road. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The site area of 5.97 acres is proposed for 16 lots to be developedc for single family, detached residences. They will be served with an existing public water system - S.P. District No. 3 and on-site individual septic tank drainfields until Spokane County public sewer selvice is extendeti to the ProPertY• 12. Location of the proposal. Give suflicient information to a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of tne site(s). Provide a legal descripdon, ' site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you shauld submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. The proposed Preliminary Plat is located in the Ponderosa area of the Spokane Valley, south of Dishman-Mica Road, Schaeffer Road, and is an extension of Sundown Drive, located in Section 33, Township 25 North, R.ange 44 East. 13. Dces the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for tioundaries). ASA -Yes; GSA - Yes; PSSA - Yes; City of Spokane - No. _ -3- , TO BE COIbfPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIItONNiENTAL ELEMENTS , 1. EAR'1'H a. General description of the site (circle one): (Flat), rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Approximately 2 percent. c. What general types of soils are found on dle site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agri- cultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. According to the 1968 SCS Soi! Survey, the site soils are classified as Clayton sandy loam (CuB). This soil typically has a deep surface layer of sandy loam 36-48 inches deep. This soil is very well drained and works fairly well for development, as evidenced by adjacent development. It has a moderate to low resistance to erosion, high shear strength for trafficability, moderate water holding capacity, and is easy to establish vegetation on. .r d.' Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. No. ' . e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or gradins proposed. Indicate source of fill. The quantity of excavation is unknown; however, should be minimal since the site is fairly flat and excavation will only , be done to provide for basements, utilities, and streets. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. This soil rype could erade under excessive stormwater runoff, but can be prevented wiin good preventative measures, both during and after development. -4- g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious sur- faces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? . Approximately 23 percent of the site v-rill be in impervious areas - buildings, driveways, and streets. . . h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the eaRh, if any: Erosion control measures will be employed both during and after constroclion as permanent improvements which will include grassy swales, landscaping of all graded areas, and forntal lawn areas, and an on-site stormwater management system. Measures during construction will include nunimizing the dme graded areas are uncovered and utilizing straw matting, etc. for temporary ground cover prior to revegetating after the construction period. 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantides if known. During construction, grading and construcdon equipment will emit dust and exhaust. Upon completion, the project will generate emissions from vehicles and from individual homes with potential of fireplace facilities. b. Are there any offsite sources of emissions or odor that may affect your . proposal? If so, generally describe. Yes. Subdivisions adjoining the site to the north and northwest and nearby arterials, i.e., Schaeffer Road and Dishman-Mica Road generate traffic volumes, both of which emit exhaust and smoke. Dust from nearby farming activities to the south during geriods of high wind may impact the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or conVol emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Dust will be controlled with dust abatement methods during • construction, and air emissions will be nunimized by the code requirements for the installation ' of proper fireplace equipment. -5- 3. WATER a. SURFACE: (1) Is there any surface water Uody on or in the immed.iate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)7 If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. Plouf Creek exists offsite (500 to 1,200 feet) to the north and runs generally from the southeast to the northwest along Dishman-Mica Highway. (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. No. (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. • None. (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diver- sions? Give general description, purpose, and aFproximate quantities if known. None. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. (6) Dces the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume to discharge. No. b. GROUND: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate -6- . i quantities if known. Yes, stormwater may be discharged into grassy swales and drywells. (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. Sanitary waste will be collected in individual septic tanks and filtered througll their associated drainfields for the proposed 161ots on site. Stormwater will be discharged to grassy swales and drywells. (3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the dis- - posal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, ihe amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials wluch may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities). The project will include grass-lined swales, retention areas that will be sized per the Drainage Plan, (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? No. (5) What protective measures will be taken to inswe that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to ' percolate to ground water (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? All areas susceptible to exposvre to leaks will be hard surfaces (i.e., driveways) for easy cleanup. -7- c. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Descn`be the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal if any (include quanddes, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. ' The source of runoff will be on-site stormwater and offsite from upgrade from the northwest and south. This project will be served with a stormwater oollection system based on proper grading and compliance with the Drainage Plan and collection within the str+eets on site routing stormwater to grassy swales. (2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or ground water or to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or ground water? No. (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, ° generally describe. No. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed acdon lies within the Aguifer Sensitive Area. Be especially clear on explanations reladng to facilities concerning Section 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). Installation of on-site drainage system and landscaping of all yard areas will reduce any impacts to water. 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. Scattered _X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, (pine), other. shrubs. _X grass. Natural pasture. crop or grain. wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other. water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation. -8- b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? The site is sparsely covered with a variety of native deciduous and evergreen plants, trees, and grasses. Most of this material will be removed to make the street, udlity, drainage, yard area landscaping and homesite improvements. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants or other measures to pre- serve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Domestic improvements such as lawns and shrubbery on site will be made. T 5. A►1VIlviALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, (so»gbirds) other: mammals: (deer), bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: None other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Unknown. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Unknown. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. -9- . . 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electric power and/or natural gas will be utilized for lighUng and heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally descnbe. No. - c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or conVol energy impacts, if any: Construction pursuant to Northwest LTBC Energy Code standards. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ' a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to tolcic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?; If so, describe. None. (1) Describe special emergency scrvices that might be required. None. (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Installation of stormwater drainage system and sanitary sewer system for the collection and treatment of waste materials. ti. Noise: . (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? The site is located within a residential area and has very little . ambient noise associated with its land use. Nearby arterials and railroad may be heard during times of those transportation use activities. -10- . . , . (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associ- ated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Short-term: heavy equipment activilies such as conshuction grading and building activities. Long-term: no substantial noise generated from the proposed residenlial land use. (3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? . The current use of the site is vacant, and single family residential development exists to the northwest and south, with adjacent properties to the north and east being vacant, except for the Union Pacific Railroad to the northeast. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. None lalown. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. . . ~ d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? Not applicable. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? . UR-3.5. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designadon of the site? Not applicable. ' -11- h. Has any part of the site been ciassified as an "envimnmentally sen- sitive" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside. or work in the completed project? Approximately 40 people would reside on site at full buildout of 161ots. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or,reduce displacement impacts, if any: Not applicable. l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compadble with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The project is consistent with adjoining land uses and will be developed pursuant to all required subdivision, zoning, and code requirements. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Sixteen (16) single family, detached homes will be provided in the middle to upper housing category. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Not applicable. -12- 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Two-story maximum height, per Zoning Code standards. Principal exterior building material will be of wood or masonry siding, complementary to other homes in the area. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Views of the subject property will change from vacant land to individual residendal lots similar to those of adjacent homesites. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Development pursuant to Zonirg Code standards, with proper seibacks, height controls, and residential landscaping of each lot and open space areas. 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What type of day would it mainly occur? Street lighting will be present; interior lighting of homes during evening and night hours. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. , c. What exisdng offsite sources of light or glare may affect your pro- posal? None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control iight and glare impacts, if any? None. -13- ' 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreadonal opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Dishman Hills Natural Area, open to the public, elrists approximately 2 miles to the northwest. Castle Park is within mile of the site, and Brown's Park is approximately 2 miles from the site, both to the northeast. Painted Hills Golf Course exists nearby to the south. Information provided by Spokane County DataAtlas (1981). b. Would the proposed project displace any exisdng recreadonal uses? If so, describe. No. c. Proposed measvres to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? ~ If so, generally describe. , No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeo- logical, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: None. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if ainy. The site will be served access by the extension of Sundown Drive. See Preliminary Plat. - -14- r' b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The nearest transit stop is at University Road and 32°d Avenue, 7 blocks from the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? A minimum of two offstreet parking spaces per lot will be provided. , d. Will the proposal require any new roads or sVeets, or improvements to existing roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). Yes, see Preliminary Plat of record. The proposal zncludes both on-site driveways for each home as well as the extension of Sundown Drive and a connecting cul-de-sac extending from the north side of Sundown Drive. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If know, indicate when peak would occur. At full build-out the project will generate approximately 160 average daily trips at 10 ADT's per unit. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Offstreet parking and road improvements pursuant to City standards. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: - fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, ouier)? If so, generally describe. Yes, increased fire and police pro:ection will be needed together with school service. -15- ~ . b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public ser- vices, if any: None necessary, as adequate public services already exist in the immediate vicinity for this proposal. 16, iJTII.ITIES a. Circle utilities currendy available at the site: (electricity), (natural gas), (water), (reJuse service), (telephone), sanitary sewers, (septic system), other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. All utilities will be constructed within the project and connected to existing electrical, natural gas, telephone, cable TV, and public water within the immediate vicinity. Public sewer exists approximately mile or more ta the north and northwest, which most likely be extended to tlus plat at some point in the future. At that time, the 16 homes would be connected to it for public sanitary sewer service. .r -16- C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made trut.hfiilly and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the ggencX may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance tllat it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Date: 2//D LV Proponent: tk) M~--P Lb-L,10 0 lear-e Print or Type) Proponent: ~ Address: 1,5 Z4 W• T~ i✓`~,/'~ l. Phone: (o Z y- ► ~ ►,V ,,qC) Z'G `I Person completing form: . Adams 8c Clark, Inc. Date: Z~ I QJq 7 Phone: f S 6 c~2e.l 7-qLall-_ FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and otlier pertinent information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance. -~e B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental iinpacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated determinadon of nonsignificance with corndidons. C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance. FILING FEE - $75.00 ~