The URL can be used to link to this page

27886 PE-1848 BRADLEY HEIGHTS FAX COVER SHEET SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE 1026 W. Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 Phone: (509) 477-3600 Second Floor Fax # (509) 477-7655 . DATE: FAX # Oq r "5b 33 TO: ~ t~~VM~ . COMPANY: CITY/STATE: Number of Pages (including cover sheet): J _ FROM: ~ MESSAGE: ~ja1r1 ~'-✓'G~ .4VwL ' ~CA--v4-",,?4 iD 'f~~ -65(W ~ zL bw rc ~ .-~~a~ _ ~ ~ ~~~4 XAJ,&s . SA►MPLE LEr--"4TER OF CREDIT (BANK LE7TERHEAD, to include address, phone # and other pertinent information) IRREVOCABLE STANDBY I.,ETTER OF CREDIT 1 FoR ROAD AND DRAINAGE CONSTRUCTION AND ROAD AND DRAINAGE INSPECTION Date: Beneficiaries: APAticant: For Road and Drainage Construction, and Name: Road and Drainage Inspection: Address: Spokane County Engineer's Offce 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Phone: Attn: Ed Parry, P.E. Letter of Credit Number: Expiry Date: At Our Counters Presently Located At: Amount: Not exceeding USDollars $64,200.00 (Sixty-Four Thousand Two Hundred USUollars), itemized as indicated below. We hereby issue this irrevocable standby letter of credit for (Plat name and number) available by your draft(s) drawn on us and accompanied by the following documents: A. For Road and Drainage Construction Not exceeding USDollars $57,700.00 (Fifty-Seven Thousand Seven Hundred USDollars) for road and drainage construction . l. A signed statement from the Spokane County Engineer's Office reading exactly as follows: "I, the undersigned duly authorized representative of the Spokane County Engineer's Office, hereby certify that the draft drawn under this letter of credit represents the amount of money required to complete the installation of roadway improvements including grading, gravel, paving, curbs, sidewalks, storm drainage, drainage swales, monuments, street signs andlor other work as is incidental and related thereto in accordance with the drawings and specifications as subinitted to and accepted by the Spokane County Engineer's Office on October 14,1999. 2. The original of this letter of credit. B. For Road and Drainage Inspection Not exceeding USDollars $6,500.00 (Six Thousand Five Hundred USDollars) for road and drainage construction inspection 1. A signed statement from the Spokane County Engineer's Office reading exactly as follows: "I, the undersigned duly authorized representative of the Spokane County Engineer's Office, This Page 1 of 2 forms an integrat part of Letter of Credit No. hereby certify that the draft drawn under this letter of credit represents the amount of money required to complete the construction inspection of roadway improvements including grading, gravel, paving, curbs, sidewallcs, storm drainage, drainage swales, monumeots, street signs and/or other work as is incidental and related thereto in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and accepted by the Spokane County Engineer's Office on October 14,1999. 2. The original of this letter of credit. SPECIAL COND1fiIONS 1. Any and all banking charges other than those of the issuing bank are for the account of the beneficiary. ~ 2. It is a condition of this letter of credit that it shall be automatically extended, without amendment, for an additional period of one year from the present expirarion date or each future expiration date, unless we have notified you in writing not less than thirty (30) days before such expiration date, that we elect not to renew this letter of credit. All written notification shall be sent via registered mail. Drafts drawn under this credit must bear the clause: "Drawn under (bank's name and letter of credit number) for (name of activity)." This credit is subject to the "Uniform Customs and Practice for pocumentary Credits (1993)", Tnternational Cbamber of Commerce Publication No. 400. We hereby engage with you that draft(s) drawn andlor documents presented and negotiated under and in compliance with the terms of this irrevocable standby letter of credit will be duly honored upon presentation to us. The amount of each drawing must be endorsed on the reverse of this credit by the negotiating bank. A charge of USD25.00 will be deducted from the proceeds of any drawing presented with discrepancies. NAME OF ISSUING BANK Signature, and signatory's authority f' This Page 2 of 2 forms an integral part of Letter of Credit No. I titz icom p ry 0 DAVID EVANS Octobc;r 242 2002 A N o A S S O C I A T E S i rv c. ~GOVNTY ENGINF~AS RECEIVED OFFtC1AL PUBUC DOCUMENT ORIGINAL Mr. Randy Stronks N nV 0 4 2002 11as- B U I LTS,, Spokane County Engineers SPOMW COuNrY ENCERTIFIED RECORD DRAWINGS 1026 W. Broadway ~INEER Spokane, Washington 99260 PROJECT DATE ACCEPTED: 11115/0 L Subject: Record Documents for Bradley Heights Subdivision, P-1848 Dear Randy, Thank you for reviewing the certification package for this plat, which I submitted on October 1. I have summarized your comments and provided responses as follows: 1. The submittal of a letter formally requesting certifrcation is required. This letter shall serve as the request for certification. 2. Each Mylar record drawing is to bear the required certification statement. The certification statement has been added to each record drawing. 3. The asphalt field test.s show the depth on Mission Avenue as 2", instead of 3" as shown on the plans. Scott Walters of Budinger and Associates, who were present during paving operations and performed the materials tests, explained to me that his field personnel transposed the notes in their logbooks. Their books incorrectly indicated that the 2" of asphalt and 4" of CSTC were placed on Mission, when in fact they were placed on Edgerton Court. Similarly, the 3" of asphalt and 6" of CSTC were not placed on Edgerton Court, but on Mission Avenue. Furthermore, Budinger cored both roads on October 22, 2002, which we both observed. On Mission, the measured ACP depth was 3" and tlie CSTC depth was 6". On Edgerton, the measured ACP depth was 2" and the CSTC depth was 6". These depths comply with the specifications shown on the approved plans. A field report documenting these observations is included with this letter. 4. 7'he field test reports show the depth of CSTC on Mission Avenue as 4", instead of 6" as shown on the plans. See Comment 3. 5. The compaction test on the 6" CSI'C was performed at the finished grade of the rock. State specifications limit the test depth to 4". I am comforta.ble with the results as presented in Budinger's test report, which show tested compaction values greater than the minimum. Mr. Walters explained to me that Budinger typically performs compaction testing on the CSTC at its finished elevation, with the nuclear gauge in backscatter mode. West I 10 Cataldo Spokane Washington 99201 Telephone: 509.327.8697 Facsimile: 509.327.7345 - ~ a TC7 0 . I hereby request Spokane County accepta.nce of the certification of the road improvements completed for this plat. Please review the revised certification package and notify me if any additional items need to be addressed. Sincerely, . DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. C.c~. Douglas W. Busko, P.E. ~ - Civil Engineer ro MAHA0005-0005 34e~75 ~ T/STRONKS1024.doc Emms 1 Q/09/a4- Owner ENG „As_Btiilts„ Ap p 'il cant PE-1 p4g _97 Jim Mahar John Konen BRADLEY HEIGHTS 07 - 25 - 44 T& R Date 09/25/1997 @ 01:15 Prelim. Review Hcaring Date 12/03/1997 @ 10:30 45973 0505 W. CENTER, N. MISSION, E. PA_RK Lg Lots No / 17 LOTS - 3.7 AC12ES (ENGINEER'S DEPT) - Plat File- RECEIVED N 0 V 0 4 2002 3820 E. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99202 ' - budinger & associates, inc. Y.9 1 geotechnical & materia! engineers 4 Jim Mahar Octo~.ier 30, 2002 Jim Mahar Homes 8121 Maringo Drive Spokane, WA 99212 Project Number M02170 PROJECT: Bradley Heights Subdivision Spokane, WA SUBJECT: Results of Field and Laboratory Testing Report #5 At your request, we have provided field and laboratory testing setvices for the subject project. Qur services are limited to the examination and testing of specific construction components, selected at your discretion. For this period our invotvement has been limited to core drilling of asphatt concrete pavement and top course. Our daily activities are summarized in the following paragraph: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 Technician: Kyle Sanford Weather: Clear, 55° 1'/z hrs portal to portal ACP & TOP COURSE DEPTH CORING - We drilled two core holes at locations selected by DEA and Spokane County on Mission and Edeerton. Holes were drilled in order to determine depth of ACP and top course. Results are as follows: Core ~ 1 12 i Location Edgerton Road, center of cul-de-sac Mission Avenue right shoulder across . from 7614 East ACP Depth 1 2" r 3" Top Course Dept6 1 6'/z" 16" It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions, please call. Respc;ctfully Submitted, BUD NGBR & ASSOCIAF'ES, INC. . 7 Sc t ~ I ters Mgr. ~:onst uction Serviccs Sl.w/gc _ • - , . • Addres.xv - 2 • • , . David t:vans & Associates - I F C. Budinger PE Stephen O. 6urchett PE (509) 535-8841 John E. Finnegan PE FAX (509) 535-9589 .1 Scoti L. Walters ~ a iM 0 DAVID EVANS aNOASSOCIATES iNC. TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 16, 2002 PAGES: TO: Randy Stronks TELEPHONE NO: 477-3600 Spokane County Engineers FAX NO: 477-7625 FROM: Doug Busko, P.E. TELEPHONE NO: 327-8697 FAX NO: 327-7345 PROJECT: Bradley Heights Subdivision, P-1848 PROJECT NO: M4HA0000-0005 ~ AS YOU REQUESTED 0 FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ RECORDS MANAGEMENT ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ ' ITEM ` COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 1 10/16/2002 Revised Mylar record drawings 2 1 10/16/2002 Inspection records 3 1 10/16/2002 Certification letter COMMENTS: Randy, Attached is the complete certification package for this project. Please let me know if you need anything else at this time. Thanks, Doug ~ a r 0 DAVID EVANS ANDASSOCIATES INC. . TRANSMITTAL . DATE: October 1, 2002 PAGES: TO: John Hohman, P.E. TELEPHONE NO: 477-3600 Spokane County Engineers FAX NO: 477-7625 FROM: Doug Busko;-P:E.` ~ TELEPHONE NO: 327-8697 FAX NO: 327-7345 PROJECT: Bradley Heights Subdivision, P-1848 REC~I PROJECT NO: MAHA0000-0005 V~D at: 20sPO,~ - ~2 ~ AS YOU REQUESTED Z FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUEST&NrYENGIMFE R ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ RECORDS MANAGEMENT ❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ ITEM COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 1 9/30/2002 Record drawing Mylars of road plans 2 1 9/30/2002 Inspection reports, materials reports COMMENTS: John, . Attached are the Mylars of the record drawings for the road construction at Bradley Heights, along with a full set of the inspection and materials reports for the project. Please let me know if you need anything else at this time. Thanks, . Doug b33NIJN3 AlNf10o 3MYA0A Zooz z o l3o , RECEIVED DEA_SPK 3820 E. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99202 budinger & associates, inc. eers Y-9 ~ geotechnical & materiai t_~ 4 Jim Mahar July 29, Jim Ma har Homes 8121 Maringo Drive to tl l0°L Spokane, WA 99212 Project Number M02170 PROJECT: Bradley Heights Subdivision Spokane, WA SUBJECT: Results of Field and Laboratory T'esting Report #3 3uiy 24 througt► 27, 2001 At your request, we have provided field and laboratory testing services for the subject project. Our services are limited to the examination and testing of specific construction components, selected at your discretion. For this period our involvement has been limited to laboratory testing of 1 sample collected by us on July 24, 2002, compaction testing of top course, and asphalt concrete pavement. The following laboratory test was conducted in generai accordance with the method listed: l. Modified Proctor AASHTO T-180 Field densities were determined at random locations according to Nuclear Methods (ASTM D-2922/2950). We believe the results are representative of the lift exposed in the immediate area of our test during our site visit. Results should not be considered representative of compaction of other areas, lifts, or fills, if any. Laboratory results are presented on the attached Laboratory Summary. Compaction results are presented on the attached Results of Compaction Tests forms. Our daily activities are summarized in the fo(lowing paragraph: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 Technician: Steve Wilson Weather: 3 hr minimum/6 miles mobilization . EDGERTON ROAD CUL.-DF-SAC TOP COURSE COMPACTION The contractor placed and compacted top course for Edgerton Road cul-de-sac. Two compaction tests were conducted at grade in the 4" of top course with results indicating compaction of 96% and 97%, exceeding the specified minimum (95%). Thursday, July 25, 2002 Technicians: Steve Wilson/Matt Straub Weather: Partly Cloudy, 80° 3 hr minimum/6 miles mobilization MISS[ON STREET TOP COURSE COMPACT[ON The contractor placed and compacted top course for the north shoulder of Mission Street. Compaction tests were conduced at grade in the 6" of top course with results indicating compaction ranging from 95°1a to 98%, meeting or exceeding the specified minimum (95%). F.C. Budinger PE . Stephen D. Burchett PE (509) 535-8841 • John E. F(nnegan PE FAX (509) 535-9589 Scott L. Walters * ~ Bradley Heights Subdivision Pcoject Number M02170 ' Spokane, WA July 29, 2002 Report Saturday, July 27, 2002 Technician: Wendy Iris - Weather: Clear, 80° 3 hr minimum/12 miles mobilization ASPHALT COMPACTION The contractor placed and compacted asphalt at the Edgerton cul-de-sac and the Mission widening. Tests were taken at grade on 2" to 3" thick asphalt with results indicating compaction ranging from 92% to 96°/a, meeting or exceeding the specified minimum (92%). We obtained one sample of asphalt for a maximum theoretical density (rice), oil content, and gradation. It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions, please call. Resp fully Submitted, BUD j R& ASSOC TES, INC. ~ S tt . alters M Construction Services SLW/gc . Addressce - 2 David Evans & Associates - 1 2 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnicai & material engineers ~ Bradle Hei ts Subdivision Y P~ Projed Number M02170 • Spokane, WA PROCTOR LABORATORYSUMMARY , " llNITS LABORATORY NUMBER 02-0470 02-0701 SA.MPLE Ni1MBER 1 2 SAMPLED BY B&A B&A SAMPLE TYPE Bulk Bulk DATE RECEIVED 6/14/02 7/24/02 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION silty sand with gravel top course MAXIMUM DENSITY pcf 136%Z 141 %z OPTIMUM MOISTIIRE % 7.2 6.1 SAMPLE MOISTURE % 4.8 5.0 BULK S.G. (t3/4) 2.600 - CORRECTED MAX DENSITY pcf 138.2 - CORRECTED OPT MOIST'URE % 6.8 - budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & material engineers • ' . ~ Bradley Heights Results of Asphalt Project Number M02170 , SPokane, wA Compaction Testing TEST COURSE DENSITV (pcn INDtCATED TEST # DATE LOCATION DEPTH DEPTH FIELD MAXIMUM COMPACTION SPEC y ACP CUL-DE-SAC 1 7/27/02 35' from N edge of pavement 0 20#' 148.2 154.7 96 92 2 " 44' from S curb line 0 2"' 141.6 154.7 92 92 3 " 70' from N edge of pavement 0 2"* 143.3 154.7 93 92 ACP MISSION ROAD 4 " E end 0 30#* 144.3 154.7 93 92 5 " Middle 0 3"* 143.4 154.7 93 92 6 " W end 0 31f* 146.5 154.7 95 92 •infocmation providcd hy othcrs budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & materiai engineers . BRADLEY HEIGNTS SU}3DIVISION PRC»CC'r NuMaER M02170 SPOt;ANE, WA ' RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS TEST DEPTH THICKNESS MOISTURE °1o DENSITY COMPACTION # DATE LOCATION BELOW FSG OF F1LL FIELD (4) OPT. (1) FIELD (2) MAX. (1) % SPEC. EDGERTON ROAD CUL- DE-SAC TOP COURSE 27 7I24I02 SW area 0 411,* 5.2 6,1 135.5 141.5 96 95 28 " North area center 0 4"'` 6.2 6,1 137,7 141.5 97 95 M(SSION STREET NORTH SHOULDER TOP COURSE 29 7/25/02 150' E of W end 0 69* 5,4 6.1 139.0 141.5 98 95 30 " 300' E of W end 0 61)* 5.2 6.1 135.1 141.5 95 95 31 " 450' E of W end 0 6"* 5.4 6.1 137.4 141.5 97 95 32 " 30' W of E end 0 6"* 6.7 6.1 137.1 141.5 91 95 33 " 40' E of W end 0 621* 4,7 6,1 133.9 141,5 95 95 ' information provided by others (1) AASHTO T-99 (2) ASTM D-2922 (3) ASTM n•1556 (4) ASTM D•3017 budinger & assoclates, inc. geotechnical & material engineers ~ ~r } ' . . , ~!w~ • ' • ' ' " SPOKANE CoUNTY U7'llJ't'IES OIVIStQN WASTEIIIIATER OPERATIONS - - . . INSPECTION REQUEST FtJRM owwTF: f4~,vc,~sY- ~ aao, ? , FRVM: pROJECT NAME: - - ' REQiJEST FOR: 0 PRE-PAVING T.V. INSPECTION OptiaWkvpecgon. unless dtmvrfse requededvra kckud.tlx same as Post ~ hsp~io~ CHECK HERE FOR RE-T1/ INSPECTION 0 POST-PAVING T.V. INSPECTION Requded iupwdion P(tor to eocepWM iwkbes Mdeo irapecOon ct oocrpkte bes for: 'oiearhmss Vublocaff= 4s*Wjft&ylst,ft - Q CHECK HERE FOR RE 'N INSPECTION ~ POST•PANING MANHOLE INSPEC7t4NS ~ SPECIAL tNSTRUCTIONS: i t-:. . ~ C-~. /~•~t~-- ' ' • /~..~~,1~'~ ~ O J~~f~~ 6r ~L'.T,~~pn.~ • . CONTRACT4R: B[LLING ADORESS: 44>2-4 E-. ~ zK-'' ~,~=-AcD_ .oA 93?oz ~ P eoac: N F10.D iNSPECTOR: (mxkde draitinB of ad IFnes end/or rr,antrdks requesced) . . ~ . • . . . ACTiV(TY t. J08#: PROJECi': • . ATTACNMENTS: Q ORAWlNG OF REQUESTEO AREA 0 iNCLUDES MANNOLE VS ~ INCLUDES 114 SECTION #'S OATE: 8Y: - ~ O• IIEREANO O • O • . issvE oATE: ENTER FII..E NO.: J08 NO.: . YHS TAPE NO.: , SET TO START @: HR MIN SEC OASAP []WHEN POSSIBLE []OTHER ADO;TlONAL lNSTRUCTIONS: r,.' . . , • , : ' . oATE coMPLETEo: OPERAT4R(S) . . . ~ . White - Uulities Ye(iow copy - Construdion . e r:` • ~ . _ . . SPOKANE .:OUNTY UTllaT1ES 01VlS10.-_) WASTEWATER OPERATI4NS - lA1SPECTiON REQUEST FORM . a •A • DATF: ~ ~L~/ l a , Zoc Z T t ~ FROM: u~~„~ t.t-~ ~ - ♦ ~ ~~~~5 a c 3Z7 - $to 4'~ . PROtECT NANtE: REQMST FOR: ~ PRE-PA1/ING T.V. INSPEC-nON LF o~-~ $"~~c M~Nt~o ~E~ • OpGmai 4mpedion, uiess otlerw4se c+equeded wm tnduee ftswne ss Post pavmg k e s p e c K o m aHEac tERE FoR aE•TV itvspFCTIoN -Q --PaST-PmKG Z'.V. INSPECTION Reg~ h cpectimr PAor tv socxptarioe.InokidesMdeo ktspeaion vf canplete fnes fa- - Vem*ess "sWb locadtorts 1denA)rey mYbtft . ~ CHECK HERE FOR RE 7V INSPECTiON ~ POST-PA1/1(VC MANNOLE lNSPECTIONS 0 SPEClAL tNSTRUCTIONS: CONTRACTOR: ~av~-t~iTA~ ~v C~Lc S T BILUNG AOflRESS: 4a Z.,6r C. MCAz~! tA-t)A 49oz.1 F1Q.D lNSPECTOR: ('mdude dtawin8 of a7 kes end/or manfrales reqUesled) ' . FOUTE ♦ UTILMES • O • • A • i D ACTIVtTY J06W. PRO.tECi": . ATTACHMENTS: 0 ORAUViNG OF REQUESTEO AREA E] INCLUDES MANHOLE !t"S ~ INCLUDES 114 SECTION #'S OATE: 8Y: _ ~ • • - ANO PCIUTE TO UTiLITIES • • O • TIONS" issuE oATE: ENTER FILE NO.: J08 NO.: VHS TAPE NO.: SET TO START @: HR MIN SEC - []ASAP E]WHEN POSSIBi.E OOTHER AE3DiTlONAL INSTRUCl10NS: . . . . : . - ' ' • ' - ' . . . - ' . . OW'fE COMPi.ETED: OPERATOR(S) White - Ut~lities Yetlow oopy - Constnictivn ~ . . , - - ° 'ECEIVED 8/13/2002 budinger & associates, inc. , geotechnicai & material engineers 111,11 _ : -S 0'. Compressive Strength Report Concrete Client: Jim Mahar Homes -ASTM C-39,96 Address: 8121 Maringo Drive Spokane, WA 99212 Set G2 Project: Bradley Heights Subdivision Project M02170 Contractor: Sampled By: Ray Pearson Sample Location: Sidewalks - Mission W end Sample Date: 7131/02 Date Received: 8/1/02 Supplier: Centraf Pre Mix Mix 321130 Ticket 129340 Load: 1 Specified Strength:4000 psi _ Slump: 4'/z ~(ASTM G143. AAstTo T 1 19) Entrained Air. 3.2 . % (ASTrut c-231, aAsHTo T-152) Temperature: 72 ° (ASTnn G1064) Sample Test Age Fracture Diameter Load Area Strength % of I.D. Date da s Txpe (.01 inch (Ibs.) . (.01 inch) .s.i. Spec. 02-0538 . 1 8/7/02 B F 6.00 ~ 107975 ~ 28.30 ~3816~ 95 02-0539 I 8/28i021 28 I I I I I I . 02-0540 I 8i28/021 28 I I I I I 02-0541 I? I H 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ Remarks: Report By: A I _ ~ Terri erry Senior Laboratory Technician Report Copy To: David Evans & Associates - 1 3820 E. Broadaray Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99202 . phone: (509) 535-8841 fax (509) 535-9589 e-mail: office@budingerinc.com R ' • d ~ ~ . --REC~~~ED budinger & associates, inc. 8'5/2002 ./t~;;: geotechnical & materiai engineers n i=,&_c s Stren~th Repo~ PoSt-it- FaxNote 7671 Dat~ ~~ge Compressive S ► To,-, Fro 12 C, z Z&.45 (~a Client: Jim Mahar Homes CoJ~l~.&&)C C'A- CJ~~. c~~ ✓'J E~/,4~1 :~.t~.S.S. . Address: 8121 Maringo Drive Phone # Pnone # ` Spokane, WA 99212 Fax C 6 -6y " 74v ds ~ Fax !?zy Project: Bradley Heights Subdivision _ Project M02170 Contractor: Sampled Ey: Steve WiIson - Sampie Location: Ecfgerton Road cul-de-sac Sample Date: 7!3102 . Date Received: 7/4102 Supplier Cerrtral Pte Mix Mix 321112 Ticket 330642 Load: 1 Specified Strength: 3000 psi SIURIp: %s "(ASTM G143, AA,SHTO T 119) ' Entrained Air. 5.5 %(ASTM G231, a4sHTO T-152) Temperature: 72 ° (ASTM c-1064) Sample . Test Age Fracture Diameter Load Area Strength % of I.D. Date (days Ty.pe (.01 inch (Ibs.). (.01 inch2) .s.i. Spec. 02-0427 ~ 7/10/02 f 7 A f 6.01 ~ 107015 ~ 28.33 ~ 3778~ 126 02-4428 ~ 7/31 /02 1 28 1 1 6.01 1 132640 1 28.34 1 4681 1 156 02-0429 ~ 7/31 /02 1 28 1 1 6.01 1 133350 1 28.37 1 4700 1 157 1 I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I , Remarks: Report By` ,t A A Terri Perry ~ Senior Laboratory Technician Report Copy To: David Evans & Associates - 1 3820 E. 8raadway Avenue, Spolcane, WA. 99202 phone: (509) 535-8841 fauc (509) 535-9589 e-mail: office@budingerinc.com . - ~ . RECE'`''ED . ~ ~ DEA-SPK 3820 E. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99202 budinger & associates, inc. , geotechnical & material engineers , Y..g Q Jim Mahar August 6, 2002 Jim Mahar Homes 8121 Maringo Drive Spokane, WA 99212 Project Number M02170 PROJECT: Bradley Heights Subdivision Spokane, WA SUBJECT: Results of Field and Latsoratory Testing Report #4 At your request, we have provided field and laboratory testing services for the subject project. Our services are limited to the examination and testing of specific construction components, selected at your discretion. For this period our involvement has been limited to laboratory testing of 1 sample collected by us on July 27, 2002, compaction testing of subgrade, and sampling/testing of fresh concrete. The following laboratory tests were conducted in general accordance with the methods listed: l. Theoretical Maximum "Rice" Density AASH'f0 T-249 2. Oil Content, Ignition AASHTO T-308 3. Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate AASHTO T-30 Field densities were determined at random locations according to Nuclear Methods (ASTM D-2922). We believe the results are representative of the lift exposed in the immediate area of our test during our site visit. Results should not be considered representative of compaction of other areas, lifts, or fills, if any. Laboratory results are presented on the attached Laboratory Summary. Compaction results are presented on the attached Results of Compaction Tests forms. Our daily activities are summarized in the following paragraphs: . Wednesday, July 31, 2002 Technician: Ray Pearson Weather: Clear, 65°N 3 hr minimum/6 miles mobilization SIDEWALK SUBGRADE COMPACT[ON The contractor compacted sidewalk subgrade for the north side of Mission Avenue and for Edgerton Road cul-de-sac. Tests were conducted at grade with results indicating compaction ranging from 95% to 97%, meeting or exceeding the specified minimum (95%). F.C. Budinger PE Stephen D. 8urchett PE (509) 535-8841 John E. Finnegan PE FAX (509) 535-9589 Scott L. Waiters i ' • rf ` Beadley Heights Subdivision Projeet T1umbeE 1VZ02170 Spokane, WA August 6, 2402 Repvrt #4 ' S!£}EWA1..KS ~ONCRET'E The oontrac.tor placed concrete (64+ c.y.) far- sidewafks at Mzssion Avertue and far Edgerrtan Raad cui-de- sac. VM1'e sampEed and zested t~~ I' ofseverat loads. Resurtts indicate rompEtance with plans and specifca#'tons as fat@aws: . ~ Load ~ Size (c.y.) ~Slurrrp Temp (°F) ~ Air CySinders 1 # 9 4 72 I 3,2 ~ a 2 9 5 One {i} so of4 cylinders was cast ta represent the lvad sampled. It is a pleasu~re to be of service ta you an this project. lfyou have any quesiians, please ca11, - R~ tfully 5ubtnitted, . ~ G ~ SDCIATES, INC. ~ G, alters ~ Ivi ~ ~onstructior~ Services SLw/gc Addresme - 2 David Evsns & Associates - I ~ - 2 budinger & associates, 'rnc. geotechnical & material engineers BraJdlc;y hleights Subdivision Projeci Number M02170 Spokane. WA CLASS "A " ACP LABORATURYSUMMARY IINITS LABORATORY MJMBER 02-0710 SAMPLE NUMBER 1 A SAMPLED BY B&A SAMPLE TYPE Bulk DATE RECEIVED 7/27/02 SPEC , THEORETICAL MAX DENSITY pcf 154.7 ASPHALT CONTENT % 5.0 S 3/4" % 100 100 I 1 /2" 90-100 95.000 E 3/8" P 75-90 83 V 1/4" A - 65.0 E #4 S 46-b6 56 #8 S - 39 S # 10 I 3042 36 I #16 N - 28 Z #30 G - 20 E #40 11-24 15 #100 - 9 #200 3.0-7.0 6.7 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnica! & material engineers • BRADLEI' HEIGHTS SUBDlV1S1UN PkoJccT NuMBFK M02170 SPOlv1NE, WA . ' RES UL TS OF COMPA CTIOIV TESTS TEST DEPTH TNICKNESS MOISTURE % DENSITY COMPACTION # DATE LOCATION BELOW FSG OF FILL FIELD (4) OPT. (1) FIE.LD (2) MAX. (1) % SPEC. MISSION SIDEWALK SUBGRADE , 34 1/31102 W end 0 0 5.4 6.8 131.7 138,2 9S 95 3S W of center ~ 0 0 5.6 6,8 132.5 138.2 96 9S 36 " Center 0 0 6.0 6.8 133.7 138.2 91 9S 37 E of center 0 0 6.3 6,8 132.8 138.2 96 9S 38 " East end 0 0 5.9 6.8 131.9 138,2 9S 95 CUL-DE-SAC SIDEWALK SUBGRADE 39 " S side Q 0 5,1 6.8 132.1 138,2 96 95 40 NE side 0 0 S.5 6.8 131.2 138.2 95 95 ua4A-~ SKI~raJ~ ~ (I) AASHTU T•49 (2) ASTM D•2922 (3) ASTM D• 1556 (4) ASTM U-3017 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & matenal engineers f RECEIVED . D E 3820 E. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99202 . ~sP~ budinger & associates, 'inc. Y1 geotechnical & material engineers , Q 4 . Jim Mahar July 29, 2002 Jim Mahar Homes 8121 Maringo Qrive Spokane, WA 99212 Project Number M02170 PROJECT: Bradley Heights Subdivision Spokane, WA - SUBJECT: Resutts of Field and Laboratory Testing Repart #3 - July 24 through 27, 2002 At your request, we have provided field and laboratory testing services for the subject projec#. Our services are limited to the examination and testing of specific construcrion components, selected at your discretion. For this period our involvement has been limited to laboratory testing of 1 sample collected by us on July 243, 2002, compaction testing of top course, and asphalt concrete pavernent. The following laboratory test was conducted in general accordance with the method listed: l. Modified Proctor AASHTO T-180 Field densities were determined at random locations according to Nuclear Methods (ASTM D-2922/2950). We believe the results are representative of the lift exposed in the immediate area of our test during our site visit. Results should not be considered representative of compaction of other areas, lifts, or fills, if any. Laboratory results are presented on the attached Laboratory Summary. Compaction results are presented on the attached Results of Compaction Tests forms. Our daily activities are summarized in the following paragraph: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 Technician: Steve Wilson Weather: 3 hr minimum/6 miles mobilization EDGERTON ROAD CUL-DE-SAC TOP COURSE COMPACTION The contractor placed and compacted top course for Edgerton Road cul-de-sac. Two compaction tests were conducted at grade in the 6" of top course with results indicating compaction of 96% and 97%, exceeding the specified minimum (95%). Thursday, July25, 2002 Technicians: Steve Wilson/Matt Straub Weather: Partly Cloudy, 80° 3 hr minimum/6 mites mobilization . M[SS(ON STREET TOP COURSE COMPACTION The contractor placed and compacted top course for the north shoulder of Mission Street. Compaction tests were conduced at grade in the 4" of top course with results indicating compaction ranging firom 95% to 98%, meeting or excceding the specified minimum (95°/a). F.C. Budinger PE - Stephen D. Burchett PE (509) 535-8841 John E. Finnegan PE FAX (509) 535-9589 Scott L. Walters . • f°„►, ~ Bradley Heights Subdivision Project Number M02170 ~ Spokane, WA - July 29, 2002 Report #3 Saturday, July 27, 2002 Technician: Wendy Iris Weather: Clear, 80° 3 hr minimum/12 miles mobiiization ASPHALT COMPACTION The contractor placed and compacted asphalt at the Edgerton cul-de-sac and the Mission widening. Tests were taken at grade on 2" to 3" thick asphalt with results indicating compaction ranging from 92% to 96%, meeting or exceeding the specified minimum (92%). We obtained one sample of asphalt for a maximum theoretical density (rice), oil content, and gradation. It is a pleasure to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions, please call. Resp tfully Submitted, BUD ~R & ASSOC TES, INC. S tt . alters M Construction Services SLW/gc • Addressee - 2 David Evans & Associates - 1 - 2 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnicai & materiai engineers • ' . , , Bradley Heights Subdivision Project Number M02170 Spokane. WA PROCTOR LABORA TOR Y SUM1 VIAR Y LJNITS . LABORATORY NUMBER 02-0470 02-0701 SAMPLE NUMBER l 2 SAMPLED BY B&A B&A SAMPLE TYPE Bulk Bulk DATE RECEIVED 6/14/02 7/24/02 SAMPLE DESCRIPTION silty sand with gravel top course MAXIMUM DENSITY pcf 136% 141 %2 OPTIMUM MOIST[7RE % 7.2 6.1 SAMPLE MOISTURE % 4.8 5.0 BULK S.G. (f3/4) 2.600 - CORRECTED MAX DENSITY pcf 138.2 - CORRECTED OPT MOISTURE % 6.8 - budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & material engineers • ' . l"'" . < d Bradley Heights ReSUlfs Of AS~'lhalt Project Number M02170 ' Spokane, wA Com paction Testing TEST TH[CK DENSITY (pcf) IIYDICATED TEST # DATE I LOCATION DEPTH FILL FIELD MAX[MUM COMPACTION SPEC r.. ACP CUL-DE-SAC 1 7/27/02 35' Gom N edge of pavement 0 2 148.2 154.7 96 92 2 " 40' from S curb line 0 2 141.6 154.7 92 92 - 3 " 70' from N edge of pavement 0 2 143.3 154.7 93 92 ACP M1SS(ON ROAD 4 " E end 0 2 144.3 154.7 93 92 S " Middle 0 2 143.4 154.7 93 92 6 " W end 0 2 146.5 154.7 95 92 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & material engineers . . BRADLEI' HEIGfITS SU[3pIV1S10N PROjr:cr Numw:is M02110 SPOt:ANE, WA RESULTS OF COMPACTIO.N TESTS TEST DEPTH THICKNESS MO[STURE % DENSITY COMPACTION # DATE LOCATION BELOW FSG OF F1LL F[ELD (4) OPT. (1) FIELD (2) MAX. (1) % SPEC. . EDGERTON ROAD CUL- DE-SAC TOP COURSE 27 7I24I02 SW area 0 6" 5.2 6.1 135.5 141.5 96 9S 28 " North area center s 0 6" 6.2 6.1 137.7 141.5 91 95 MISSION STREET NORTH SHOULDER TOP COURSE 29 7125102 150' E of W end 0 4" 5.4 6.1 139.0 141.5 98 9S 30 " 300' E of W end 0 4" 5.2 6.1 135.1 141.5 95 95 31 " 4S0' E of W end Q 4" 5,4 6,1 137.4 141.5 97 9S 32 " 30' W of E end 0 4" 6,7 6.1 137.1 141.5 97 95 33 " 40' E of W end 0 4" 4.7 6.1 133.9 141.5 95 95 CS rc. . (1) AASNTO T•99 (2) ASTM D-2922 (3) ASTM D•1556 (4) ASTM D•3017 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & matenal engineers • 'V • + ~ RECEIVED7,16r2002 budinger & associates, inc. .1 J! 1 8 LQ~l geotechnical & material engineers !SP-K~ Compressive Strength Report Concrete Client: Jim Mahar Homes ASTM C-39,96 Address: 8121 Maringo Drive Spokane, WA 99212 Set G1 Project: Bradley Heights Subdivision Project M02170 , Contractor: Sampfed By: Steve Wilson Sample Location: Edgerton Road cul-de-sac Sample Date: 7/3/02 Date Received: 7/4/02 Supplier. Central Pre Mix Mix 321112 Ticket 330642 Load: 1 Specified Strength: 3000 psi Slump: p(asriut Gtas, AasHro T 1 ts) . Entrained Air: 5.5 % (ASTM G231, AASHTO T 152) • Temperature: 72 ° (ASTM C,1064) Sample Test Age Fracture Diameter Load Area Strength % of ' I.D. Date d s Txpe (.01 inch (Ibs.) (.01 inch2 .s.i.) Spec. 02-0427 ~ 7/1 Q/02 [ 7 A r 6.01 ~ 107015 1 28.33 3778 12fi 02-0428 1 7/31/021 28 I I I I I l 02-0429 1 7/31 /02 1 28 Remarks: Report By~ TLs~~i ~ erry Senior Laboratory Technician ( Report Copy To: ~ David Evans & Associates - 1 3820 E. Broadway Avenue, spokarie, wa 99202 phaie: (509) 535-8841 fax (509) 535-9589 e{nail: olfioe@budingerinc.com _ _ _ - - - . • ~ 3820 E. Broedway Spokane, Washington 99202 . budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & materiai engineers ~ i ~ rm Mahar July s, 2002 Jim Mabar Hmes 8 ] 21 Mariago Drive . . Spokane, WA 99212 Project Numbea M02170 PROJECT: Bradley Heights Snbdivision _ Spokane, WA . SUBJECT: Resutts of Field aad Laboratory Testing Repart#2 • Ju]y 3, 2002 At your request, we bave provided field and labamtary testing services fot the subject projea. Our swioes . ~ are limitod to the acanniaation and testin of specific construciion oampcments, selected at yaur disaetion. For this period our iavolvetncnt has been limitsd to sampliag/te.sting of fresh conarde. - Compressiva strmgth resulb will follow as breaks are completod. Our daily ectivities are. swmmarizod ia the following paragraph: . Wednesday, July 3, 2002. . Tedhniciaa: Steve Wilson Weaiber: Pardy Cioudy, 80° 3 hr miaimum/6 miles mobilization STRfiET CURBS CONCRETE - The contractor placod conaete (32 c.y.) f,or Edgerton Road cul-do-sac and Mission Street curbs. We . samplod and tcstcd tho la of several loads plaoed with results indicating compliance witfi spaci5cations as ~ follwvs: ~ Load ~ Sizc (ay. Slum " TemL(°~ I Air (°~6) I G~►tinders ' 1 ~ 9 q 72 ~ 5.5 ~ 3 One (1) set of 3 cylinders was cast to represcnt the load te,sted. . It is a pleasure to bo,qf service to you on this projed. If you hava aay questions, pleaso call. R Submitted, B GER &ASS IATES, INC. , w~ M Construction Services . SLW/gc Addressa - 2 F.C, Budinger PE . Stephen D. 8urchett PE (509) 535-8841 John E. Finnegan PE FAX (509) 535•9589 Scot t L. Walters JIIL 1 U CUUC J: J 1 f 11 a7UL J 1113L.1% 4 41 IL 6 1 .0.~40 v , • • 3820 E. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99202 . budinger & associates, -inc. 1 geotechnica! & materiai engineers . y4 Jim Mahaz June 24, 2002 Tim Mahar Ham es ~ 8121 Maringo Drive Spukane, WA 99212 Project Number M02170 PROJECT: Bradley Heighis Subdivisian • Spoka::e, WA - SUBJECT: Results of Field and Laboratery Testing ~ Report # 1 ]une 17 thrvugh 20, 2002 At yrQUr roquest, we have provided field and laboratay testing savices fot the subjoct projoct. Our suvices are limited to the examinatian and testing of specific oonstructiaai caQnpcments. selecbed at your discxetion. For tbis period vur iavolveaient has beea limitied to labocatory testing of 1 sample collectod by us aa June 149 2002 aad compaction testing of badcfill. Results u-cre verbally reparW in the field to the oaatractor. ~ The follvwing labaratory tests wrre caiducted in geacral aoooord8aoe witfi the methods listed: l. Modified Proctor ASTM D-1557 . 2. Specific Gravity & Absorptioa (coarse) ASTM C-127 Field densities wa+e determined at randvm locations acoomding to Nuclear Methods (ASTM D-2922). We believe the results are representative of the lift exposed in the immediate area of our test during our site visit. Results shwld not be considerod representative of compaction of oiher areas, liRs, or 5lls, if any. Labaatoty resvits are preseabed oa die attached Laboratory Sunrmcuy. Compaction results are preseated on ~ the attached Results oj Compaction -Tests form. Our daily activities sre summarized in the following PamgraPhs: - . Moaday, June 17, 2002 Technician: Ray Pearson - Weather: Partly Cloudy, 65° 3 hr miniimum/6 miles mobilization SEWER BACKFILL°' COMPACTTON Tbe contractor plaoed and oonpacted badcfill over the sewer liae at Bradley Heighcs. Tests were canductod 1' to S' below gxade in the 9' fill. RESUIts indicate compaction ranging fran 92°/a to 990/a, medi.ag or exceeding the spoczfied minimums (95% and 92%). Tuesday, June 18, 2002 Teclinician: Ray Pearson Weather: Rain, 60° I 3 hr minimum/12 cailes mobilization ' SfiWER AND WATER LINE BACKFII,L COMPACTION The oonhactor ooatinuod placemeat and compaction of sevver aad waterline baddilL Tests were oouducted 0' to 1' below grade in the 6' to 9' fill. Results indicate campactian ranging frm 95% to 98°/g meeting or exceeding the specified minimutn (95%). F.C.Budinger PE Stephen D. 8urchett PE (509) 535-8841 John E. Flnnegan PE FAX (509) 535-9589 . Scott L. Walters JUL 1 U GUUL 1: J 1 f''17 dUL 111laCJC 1'71'IU f7J,Ul.1 f'1 1 t%-~ 1 ,UJ~~a%1JOUZ p. 't . . . • ~~1, Bradley Heights Subdivision Projeci Numter M02170 Spokane, WA June 24, 2002 . Rtpaat # 1 Wednesday, hme 19,2002 Technicim: Ray Pearson . Weathea: Partly Cl+oa:dy, 65° 3 hr minimum/6 miles mobilizatian SEWER EXTENSION BACKFILL COMPACTTON The cantractar placed and ooatpa,cted back'ill fiar sewer extensions. ?ests were oonducted 0' to 1' below grade in the 9' fi1L Re.sults indicatc compadion ranging fram 959/o to 9?°/., meeking ot cxaeding the specified minmium (95°y6j. . . . Thursday, lune 20, 2002 Technician: Wendy Iris Weathea: Clear, 800 . 3 hr minimum/12 miles mobilization S'EWER dt WATERLINE BACKFILL - COMPACTTON Tbe oontradar placed aad oanpacxed badcfill over the wwerand water lines ai Bra,dley H,eights. Tests wete camducted at gmde m the 6' to 9' fill, Results indicating oompaction ranging 5vm 95'Yo to 979S, mae.ting or txceed,iQg the specified miaimum ('95%). : It is a plr,asure to be of servioe to you on this projed. If you havc any qwestioas, please call. ectfully Submitted, • B IN R& ASS 1'ES, IIJC. a ers . ction Se~vioes sLw/gc aaa,on«-2 ~ ~ 2 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & material engineers /I . < %I UL 1 U LUUL 1 i J L r11 OL/L/ L I147GfC rlI1L I IJJVV ~ 1•! LJ L JJJJJJJJLI-J r•~► . • ~ . Bradley Heights Subdivision Projcct Numbex M02170 SpQlcBne,, WA PROG7'OR LABORA71VRpSU1Pd"Y ~ _ IJNm LABORATORY NUIVBER 02-0470 SAMPI.E NLIMBER 1 SAMPLED BY B&A SAMPLE TYPE Bu1k DATE RECEIVED 6/14/02 S,AMPLE DESCRIPTION silty sand with gravel MA)CIItiitJM DENSITY pcf 136% OF'TDVIUM MOISTURE '/0 71 SAIVeLB MOISTURE °i6 4.8 Hvt,K S.G. (*3l4) 2.600 CORRF.CTED MAX DENSITY pcf 138.2 CORRECTED OPT MOISTL1tE % 6.8 . , badinger & a4societes, inc geotechnical & material esnginears BRADLEI' Hb10HT9 SUBDNISION SPoxaNE, WA , . PRO=r NuMDEt M02170 c r . . C N C RESULTs OF coMPA cTloN TEsTs R TEgT DE PTH THICKNE3S MOISTURE % DENSTTY COMPACfION " # DATE LOCATION BELOW FSO OF FILL FIEI.D (4) OPT. (1) FTELD (2) MAX, (1) % SPEC. ci SEWER BACKFILL ' i 1 6/17/02 STA 4+04 east 4' 9' 41 6.8 121.5 139,2 92 92 3 2 " STA 4+04 west % S' 9' 6.2 6.6 131.9 138,2 95 92 3 " STA 4+04 east 2' 9' 3.5 6.8 129.0 138.2 93 92 ~ 4 " STA 4+04 west 3' 9' 3.2 6.9 136.2 138.2 99 42 c S " STA 4+50 mst 5' 9' S,t 6.8 129.1 138.2 93 92 1 6 " STA 4+45 west S' 9' 6.5 6.8 127,6 138,2 92 92 c 7 " STA 4+04 east 1' ~ 9' S.3 6.8 132,8 138.2 96 95 ~ SEWER BACKFiLL . . 1 8 6I18102 STA 4+50 west 0 9' 8.5 6.8 134,9 138,2 98 9S r 8" WA'1'ER L1NE BACKFILL 1 9 " STA 5+00 0 6' 9,0 6.8 132.6 138.2 96 95 ~ 10 " STA 5+50 1' 6' 7,8 6.8 131.7 138.2 95 9S c SEWER EXTENSION r BACKFILL n 11 " STA 2+35 1' 9' 8.2 6.8 130,9 138,2 95 95 12 " STA 3+10 0 9' 7.9 6.8 133.1 138,2 96 9S ~ 13 " STA 3+70 0 9' 9.3 6,8 131.9 138,2 9S 9S ` SEWER EXTENSION ~ BACKFILL tci ~ 14 6/19I02 STA 4+20 0' 9' 7,3 6,8 132,3 138,2 96 95 15 G. STA 5+80 1' 9' 7,9 6.8 131,4 ' 138,2 95 95 ' u a 16 " STA 5+95 1' 9' 6,4 6,8 133.1 135.2 96 95 ti 17 " STA 4+75 1' 9' 8,0 6,8 134.2 138.2 97 95 ~ (1) AA.SETTO T•99 ' (2) ASTM P-2922 (3) AS7M D-1 SS6 (4) ASTM D-3011 budfnger & associates, inc, ~ geotechnical & material engineers ` 1 BRADL6Y HM0HTS SUBDMSION PROIECT NUABER M02110 C SpoKANE, WA r . . . ~ ' c RESULTS OF COiWACTION TEST'S R C TEST DEPTH THIC]CNES3 MOISTURE DENSITY COMPACTION n # DATE LOCATION BEIAW FSG OF FILL FIELD (4) OPT. (1) FIELD (2) INAX. (1) % SPEC, ; SEWER & WA'I'Lku.1NE 4 ~ EX't'ENSIONS ~ 18 6/20102 North center road 0 6' 7.4 6.8 131.4 138.2 95 95 19 " Middle azea center raad s 0 6' 6.0 6.8 133.1 138,2 96 95 24 " Swth center xoad 0 6' - 7.5 6.8 132.8 138.2 96 95 b 21 " Middle area Mission Road 0 9' 8.0 6,8 130.9 138,2 95 95 c . 22 " Edgerton extension mainline 0 9' 6.2 6.8 1341 138.2 97 95 23 " Edgerton extens;on NW run o 6' 6.8 6.8 132,8 138,2 96 95 24 " Edgeton extension SW run , 0 -6' 6.5 6.8 134.4 138.2 97 95 7 25 " Edgerton extension, SE nm 0 6' 8.5 6.8 132.7 138,2 96 95 26 " Edgerton extension, IVE run 0 6' 8.2 6.8 131.0 138.2 95 95 t ~ . C C . ~ ~ r c . ► . ~ , . . c ~c ~ t t c c t (1)AA3HT()'f•99 (2) ASTMD-2922 (3) ASTM D-1556 (4) ASTM D-3011 . budinger & assoclates, Inc. ~ . geoRechnical & mateflal engineers • • 0 INSPECTOR'S RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Project: f3 i` A P L C1 7-.S Su~ Date: 7lo z, y'o s.9m DEA Project No.: MA y,4 00o Report No.: p 73 / 6 z CONTRACTOR: Mp v A/7-~t/,J G4E-1-7- SUBCONTRACTOR: Today's Weather: y List Contractors, Work Force: ~,TD/tN~So~ 6- ~ 77 2~ . w02 K Ge E'o - / Z Equipment in use or idled: wPr-TE,e ~ , . ~ ~~~e 4F List materials or equipment delivered: Quantities of Pay Items Placed: Construction Activities: S~A r- c,48Lk W, wo{~r g~p PL~ cC 4-~.-17- . • /;'1 /SSI o.✓ P[ACIEteAr7- ~P') lss/ge+' LE tc'" . • /lf 145-&W .tt&g'a eLF ~~etno SzEE6 • ./h l5rfaw C-&AQ / - . . • ~G~"~Qi~drv caL,-pc- P6* c~ • ~'DG~~N APPRo~GH~s ~~~NG CEQ • ,~A G &a~.~ I~~..er N ~ _t'w~:f ~r~ c~~LFZ.rz-> S /z~-a ED ~~'Q23~e! ~ ✓ ~ir~~.✓T- !A-?~ ' S~'H/ER /'h s3~ !ftl 1- F P Ls9-L~'Q , f/PEs' - , , - G , #A'N AJ ~.Z F L4~ . E,D . S Ti~`i 21' 4 L / ~ ~ ' . . . . I ~ • INSPECTOR: y Page of o ~ INSPEc:TOR'S RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Project: ft,0L ~y H 7--5 Date: 7 Z f~2 DEA Pro'ect No.: ~ ) m4-&A do~-, Report No.: 07 ZZO Z CONTRACTOR: SUBCONTRACTOR: _Today's Weather. Lfst Contractors* Work Force: zEieo Equipment in use or idled: 1 Do z2 - ~ List materiais or equipment delivered: Quantities of Pay I#ems Placed: Construction Activities: oZMt21 U i i~,(.7'/ ¢'.,S' :STi~ . . ~ . ~ M 1 SS/oAol J~v-" ~j►- S', ~rti G~ ~'~'2 A195'4-tJ ~ ✓T 1fv O J?~~~- ,gr tiE~ C~t.~E12 I • ~ el . ~ INSPECTOR: Page of ~ , . . • 0 1NS21CTOR'S RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Project: 6~KCY ~~~T.S Date: -71*-1eP2- YA*f ~p~ ,~p,~ Report No.: DEA Project No.: CONTRACTOR: dJJVATZ&,41 SUBCONTRACTOR: 4.2)~ Today's Weather. 70 ° 01--~~J~ List Contractors'Work Force: / pO~TVoC. l2 144904MVICS f ~ Equipment in use or idled: y List materials or equipment delivered: C.U44eWL . Quantities of Pay Items Placed: J Construction Activities: ~ ,e- /~y✓D 1~~ Q~ itr&llt/1922 o o ~t~/f ~✓D ~~t9~✓ ~'nllfl MI~I6 @ Ce~r2,~- ~ 30 ~ ~c.S J ~ l,~' o~ 7~' f-?~! ~-sr~~N~ ~~~~,z'~~/ C u~/'JE~=.5~9-C ~ ./Z~~i;►~2.s - j~'o.~r~G,~.--~-~ 7z R4rsseo^/ . ; ~ ~ INSPECTO~! Page - ~ of ~ ~ /NSPCc;TOR'S RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS - Project: ~eAbLe p6'r's Date: F,,t $,o Z, DEA Project No.: ~~A C~cps pdp5 Report No.: 61 S o2, CONTRACTOR: 0-4e"S?- SUBCONTRACTOR: _.t*MVE 07Z0 livSP C=-wo OSSS` _ ■ Today's Weather: 6 ° iQ„PoAl 540c~ ~-p-5 - - ~ ~ List Contractors'Work Force: 2. ATO,e S, I ~=o I Equipment in use or idled: ~ T,e,q-c_KNoE , Z L oA oe-& s, i 5,4E'-6PS ;=ooT /&c,4.6a2, ~ , f 1 5 Mhc c G4-t- Stzvic -c- 2c c. List materials or equipment delivered: . ~ Quantities of Pay ttems Piaced: Construction Activities: ?Ipg7 C,ec-o S-rQ, A36tNb P., O .4t.o...)6 'Tie-.r,v 4-ioJ67' v` L' PoT 14 ou^,6 Eiuo ~ TiG-r r~1S~ MA~~2G L wf~s iA)sEIU~o ~ 07 ' 4(7 440 P-AS 5C"o C~ C C f~•~J ~'D(P65 PC.U 6 6 C0 f0KE55 Vr 0 70 (,D o'7 -4-rO ' ~"-55%je c ,pao P Ps--,o To 3, S!". P .9L ~ 082.0 1f-nl 4 . ~ N c 2 E o STA~° ~ e. t Ze-o ^N .4 3C7-4,4--J 7t7s7- ~jet4.~ 76'5.`r" , ~-2t o o ~ S~ hn ~ ~J . `i'o OS 3S c~ ! ??1 No (~2p R2.r ~5 u4e. ~ vf •+l~ ; / A5J p, L / ti/ L'-0-V 7/t'rWTVve, h. A-` 0V i► 1✓ I-kUv 5 ' AO V d ~ IO A fv1-~ QZ r72Z t?- 5: A5 a.J s ' e! O " T-P A T 6(s.0-4,0c, I S U P A'I'J.Q tS C t-A vC-7 , .j ~ , ~ - INSPECTOR: Page ot ~ 1 ~ • ~_L ~ _ . . . /NSPcc%p TOR'S RECORD OF WORK PRO,G ESS Project: S"o(-GY 14't- S. Date: b l! 7/o z DEA Project No.: pA ,¢f},,.+ oov s ooas Report No: G 170 Z CONTRACTOR: W%e,u.v?0# f•v C/l.E.-sr SUBCONTRACTOR: - ~~u~' 0-7 4-0 Today's Weather: C~v rJy~ 60 ° ~ List Contractors* Worfc Force: Z ove~-;-~QS ^ t yr-Aw%s rb-e L^sorr.4c-/~L Equipment in use or idted: I 7e.r- cr N-oE, 2 c.o/werzS CA-T , I w4:).-yz- -ra.vc-v- ,I 5e-2vicC Rl(M List materials or equipment delivered: 8/8 ';oIIc774.C- NZO *01,47irf 1'/-44WW&z4- Quantities of Pay items Placed: Construction Activities: ~1ZUA,%' 64-r-.01.,~/ j00d,Jo Id ~ SC4vIC-e UA/07VS Xe=So 3471,)(6 pG&s-D TV :~.=7- /.v CU4-,049r-S/fG. ~ f►~It.C.. 9-ae do•w,% 09e1'GT"70P1 414NNQ /VOQ A/ 7?:ST,S lrJ 6~.E ~ Z% O&AvsIT`' -~C',,~ CZC.J c.VF5 ~ /~s ru~vc-rb-~o aW MInl. ~,oivso t,J I c.c. ^o,T'u sT' 6 /:~~*C► LL Paw-E' 0 ve 4r 7a E' 77tE 'M0 ~y~~1. !5 w~~ O4- I nnP~~~ , Mv2~ ~r~srry ~.-sr i~ ~~7~~0•✓ S7-4 e7j~7 v ex7~F^ja 14L M ~ SS/ o•✓ 5~ rl vi~ C-s (14 30 )oeAn) Q % 4- /5" 0 L.or / 4- ' Bt*tA~- F, c, L CoNT I ,Jv e o OPJ .GD6cCro~J sW,e, w~,- ~ 1 ~ t P~~ x 27= 4( o F~ t= 1 ut- ~ ~ - ~ ~ . ~ ~ Page of INSPECTO,~R: , ~ ~ + n , INSPt~TOR S RECORD OF WORK PROGRESS Project: 6(LA,0G4:16- YM-E, I-S Date: 6/14,/p 2 DEA Project No.: MA f} 004S^ app J Report No.: G t4..0 Z CONTRACTOR: /11,0 v A) j CeP t~7- SUBCONTRACTOR: . 0-73SaactW6 /5 30 ►~~~~T - Today's Weather: yyJosrz y CZC-42 7S° List Contractors* Work Force: 2 0PC24'TO95 , Z L~9~3o~QS r~ SV ~~2vlSo•e , r Equipment in use or idied: Lo~qp c-2 S List matenals or equipment delivered: Quantities of Pay ttems Piaced: "PipE ~ 5 we- yvH C? Z . ~ Construction Activities: P p6- S-XPoSrO o N/fert ►J A L- 1 &'n~ o (2 3 t 3+3o(pCt4~ C, - /A!) t 31 5 6 , p1pE' rs wFST Lo~~/- o~ &VO,,1 (o Ptl~c.r. ~i Pe-/3 r3 E/Jo,.✓~ l5 1~~~ ~ j~+z. 1~~~`.aA I'!y ~~,,,11~ • V~~-V 0.-.'y~ ~ ~YYC ~4--77 ~ LT , 3+82 kT' , . 4 +O¢ 2T , ¢+07 3 1.T - j F '5 04 +53ut4,7- PGgN,f ~ , l Sr oE' ~.,~s}s U41D'~ l~T ?a ~3+7q sra.l , 2x4 r 2E- -F FmT M»~tat- _ , P(A<-4g",0 ~ lJ~-. D F42' SezV /C6' tA T 3- No EwAr~o.J N0 r+lED ytFT ~ VW Pt.A~ Ci7 W0 S wI L P~ Ce.sr RC.c 'c (',.A.I A ~J,4 b u 13 Fa 2 2 g. SC(z-Qt c-C:; SAAJO 61, .t'O n)o Ct..'t'N / F3 "o or W,4SAsaJr ~ o~l fJe /?~S Fs~2 u-C.~ t/~ r(On/ E, 5 09~'t~G - Q- We-,Ur` Q~ t~ E. f1.J !E Of F-5,E.'r 09Z7S s"`'I(W 15" 5w2 PiP E Qot9 oS f15 Fa,LowS : I' l W1 il 4°,- V' 1Y• V 1.5Y•1 dE>r),\ SS /VC VVw&e I/" 6- I23464 ~ A-57wl 03034-11~5 oL uSTE4J 9Z ! - F S ~'38 L . i ;L~~f 15E,ev1cz pt PG,# 'IeCA,03 A-s r°'at.1.ow.~ : PWP(P~ rYPE P5w1 S0C 35 4) V C SFw t4 AiAIF . i Z 4 6'48 /t 57,*1 C~ -!>o U L L tSTCO e'I z , INSPECTOR: Page ~ of ~ DRAINAGE REPORT Bradley Heights Subdivision Spokane County, Washington Prepured for: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. 8121 E. Maringo . Spokane, Washington 99213 . . ~ . ~ DEA Project No. I1/IAHA0005 ~NAL EXPtAES 10/n9/70 THE DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN 1N THIS SET OF PLANS CONFORM TO THE APPLYCABLE EDITIONS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND THE SPOKANE COUNTY GUiDELINES FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. ALL DESIGN DEVIATIONS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. I APPROVE TF-IESE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION. September 2, 1999 • „ . o , , • d ; Quality DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, . ~ J V Z ~ g < ~ LL Z 7 uj t LL ~ ~L~ t~ K~ 0 O V ¢i fiN y ..C~O=;iz d'Z2 =aiW~o ~m m 21L DRAINAGE REPORT 3~°• WW a aQ W ~o~ o W W H ~ ~ ~ WWZm~UQZ D~/~ JJjC2 W 'EL 0? ~i Q~• Q~ dt~C W 0- ~%tL1JZZoc'w?~ ~ ~ Z ? V E Bradley Heights Sub ~Qg~°gQ~~o_ WP Q.- W~ Spokane County, Washington 0 ~ W W~ w Is a$ 0 ~U0~~' - ~QUCC¢p`LL, cL0 ¢aa.(.) CC°~ 0Ff-i,_ ",l PUBLIC ~ Sp~NE COUNTY ENG{ OR?q ~ NA-~ . r . .r~cT ~ Prepared for: ~o rUgL41; 7 AL # Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. RETUR14 TO~UNTY ENGu~EF-R 8121 E. Maringo . Spokane, Washington 99213 D RECEIVE . RECEIVFD AUG 0 9 1999 S E P 13 1999 SppKqNE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEA Project No. MAHA0005 9LALM ~vA wAS ~ o~~tio • 7 July 14, 1999 W75 ~IONAL EXPIRES 10/O9/ ~cn . • , . • g Quality DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 A. Intro duction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. HYDROLOGY 1 A. Pre-Development Basin .......................................................................................................................1 ' B. Post-Development Basin 2 ill. CONCLUSIONS 3 APPENDICES _ Appendix A Site Location and Soils Information Appendix B Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations Appendix C Site Photos Appendix D Post-Development Basin Map ' Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision ~ MAHAOOT/DRAI N REP713. D 0 C 07/14/99 ~cn 1 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION . A. Introduction Bradley Heights subdivision is a seventeen lot, single family development located near the intersection of Mission Avenue and Park Road in the Spokane Valley, covering approximately four acres. Road improvements for the plat include the widening of Mission Avenue and construction of a new cul de sac in the north central portion of the plat. The project is in Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, in the Spokane County, Washington, and is located within the bounds of the Rathdrum Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA). This report examines the proposed sfiormwater collection, treatment, and disposal methods that will be ' employed in conjunction with this development. - II. HYDROLOGY . A. Pre-Development Basin According to the 1968 Soil Survey of Spokane County, Washington, prepared by the Soil Conservation Service, the soil on-site is Garrison gravelly loam. This soil is found on slopes of 1 to 5 percent and is somewhat excessively drained. Spokane County has pre-approved the use of drywelis for soils in this classification. Please refer to Appendix A for additional soil information. Currently, the site is undeveloped-groundcover on the site consists of dense weeds and brush. The ground - slopes at approximately 1% from east to west, and it does not appear that the grade on the site has ever been appreciably altered. Runoff currently stays on the site and seeps into the ground following storm events. No evidence of erosion or damaging runoff patterns is apparent. Center Road, the plat's east boundary, has curb and gutter that discharges to a drYell at the intersection 1 of Mission and Center. Edgerton Court, on the plat's north boundary, slopes toward Bradley Heights; a drywell in each gutter line intercepts the flow before it enters the Bradley Heights plat. There appear to be no other possible sources of offsite flow around the site that need to be considered in this analysis: Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision 1 MAHAOOT/DRAINREP713.DOC 07/14199 ~cn 1 1 B. Post Deve/opment Basrns Mission Avenue is divided into six post-developed basins. One grassed percolation area is located within each basiu. Only every other percolation area, however, will be provided with a drywell. The areas without drywells are designed to pond to a depth of 6 inches before overflowing down the gutterl ine to an adjacent pond with a drywell. Type 1 curb inlets with 2' openings will be constructed with all swales to , aid in conveying runoff off of the road surface. One swale will be provided for each half of the new Edgerton Court cul de sac. The drainage swales will be located within the 20' border easement that girdles the cul de sac. A Type 2 curb inlet will be constructed for each swale, to convey runoff under the sidewalk. One Type B drywell is to be constructed in each swale. The drywells for the project have been designed to dispose of runoff from not only the road areas, but also from the lot areas. From Table 1 of the Guidelines for Stormwater Management, the "C" factor for a density of 4.25 DU/GA (171ots/4 acres) is 0.40. Because the precise grading plan for the lots is not known at this time, an approximate post developed basin scheme has been developed for the interior of the plat. Thus, a"C" factor of 0.40, along with the approximate interior basin areas, were used to perform Bowstring calculations. Minor changes in the basin boundaries for the lots should not have a significant impact on the drywell requirements. The swale fore each basin was sized to treat the volume of runoff from a one-half inch storm on the , asphaltic surface witliin the basin. Drywells and inlets for the project were sized using a ten-year storm intensity. The calculations for the swales and drywells are summarized in the table below. SWALE 208 VOLUME 208 VOLUME DRYWELL . REQUIKED, C.F. PR4VIDED, C.F. A 51 52 1 Type A B 67 70 None C 61 94 1 Type B D 59 59 None E 91 92 1 Type B F 108 108 None G 154 186 1 Type B H 154 186 1 Type B Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision 2 MAHAOOT/DRAINREP713.DOC 07I14/99 ' ' III. CONCLUSIONS . The proposed improvements described in this report and shown in the plan set will provide stormwater control and treatment in full compliance with Spokane County's Guidelines for Stormwater Management. ~ Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision 3 MAHAOOTlDRAINREP713.DOC 07/14/99 Appendix A Site Location and Soils Information . • , - , , Outstanding, Quality DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, ~ ShtC 1 • 5P0KANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON R, 44 E. ~ e a , ~ ~ (Joins sheet 57) r? ~ ` .4 j.~r ~ - ~ t . ~ ~ ~ t ti ~y: ~ ~ •i ~'t1 ,r.• , _ r1r - t , ~ ~ .H \ t ~1• ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ j Y ey r C r ~+7 M1fAT•1~ T` ~ l ; + R~' / ~ i . ~ ~ w ♦ + ~~w ~ t r 1 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ Scate 1: 20 000 ~ (Joins sheet 75) Mite ~ 0 ~ ~ SOIL SIIRI'EI' ' 1g occupy rolling to liilly uplands. They formed vi layered they are eacellent pl~,ces for huuting migratory R-aterfowl. loess under coniferous forest. The annual precipit,a.tion is (Capability unit VIIIw-1; not in a woodla.nd gi-oup or l 'about 23 inches, and the f rost- free season is a Uout 125 d1ys. range si te) Freeman soils are used for gmin, peas, clover, alfalfa, and grass, and a,s woodland. Gai•field Sei•ieS Freeman silt loam, 5t0 20 percent slopes (Fa6).-This lis the dominant soil on the silty upland north And east of The Garfield seiZes consists of n7e11-drained, sererely : Rockford. 1liost slopes are between 8 and 15 percent; a eroclecl soils that formed in loess under giass and siiiall few small areas have slopes of niore than 30 percent, and sliruUs. Tliese soils occu 3y ridgetops, knobs, and tlie up- soine of less th~,n 5 percent. Slo es of more than 20 per- Ever er slopes on rollinto hi-ly uplands. They h~,ve a surface es cent are short ~..nd ~are along the edges of the dr~.in~,ge«a3*s. of silty clay loain nnd a subsoil of silty clay that is Representative profile: vei-y hard, sticl.y, and plnstic. The aitiiual precipitltion o to 7 iucbes, very dark grayisb-brown, friuble silt loann; is 18 to 22 inclies, and the frost-free season is a.bout 140 grannlar structure ; neutral. ~avS• ? to 17 inches, brown, friable silt loam, grapish brotvn at a 'rhese soils ni-e used mainly forg ~•nu~,llfalfa, nnd grnss. ~ depth oY 12 inches; neutrai. Garfield silty clay loam, 0 to 30 percent slopes, severe- . 17 to 22 inches, graytsli-brown, firm silt loam that breuks into ly eroded (GaC3).-Tliis soil occupies the nlriow riclgetops 1- to 2-inch prisms ; nentrat. ' 22 to 72 inches, dark-brown, Rrm sllty clay loam, almost silt n nd upPer sloPes on JOCSSaI ilpIa11d5 111 tI18 SOUlhCaStC1•ii ' toam; breuks into prisms 1 to 2 inches wide, and then into plit of tlie counts. 312ost slo ~es ai~e be.t~~'een S niid 20 per- angular blocbs % inch to 1 inch ~vide ; neutraL • Ceilt ; iL few SmAl111e~`1S Itave S~opes of moi-e than 30 percent, ; Tlie surfnce soil, when moist, rnnbes from very dnrk and some nnrroti~~ ridgetops liave slope.s of less thnn 5 per- ' rnyish brown to dark bro~cn in color. The tegture of the ceait. Represeiitative profile : li'ubsoil ranges from heavy silt loam to silty claq loam. p to S inches, dark-Urowii, flrm silty clay loaun ; granular struc- • As much as 7 percent of some areas consists of tarkin, ture; ueutral. Denrvton, or severely eroded Freeman soils. S to 48 iuclies, durk-brown, 8rm silty clay, yellowish-broRn Thss is 1. nloderately %vell dmined soil that hns a vers siity ciay iou,n veloN a depth of 23 inches; breaks inco prisms 1 fnch to 2 inches wide and tlien into angular blocks lslowly permeable suUsoil and is saturated for short periods Yj to Ih iuch thick ; clay films coat the prisms and angular • in spring. It holds about 5 to 7 inches of mater tha,t lants vtocks ; neutral. . C811 1LSe. It is easy to work egcept when satura,ted. oOt.S 43 to 60 incbes sellowish-brocvn, &rm heavy silt loam ; breaks iFeertility netrate the lo«er layers mainly along ped faaes. The into pricros 1 ta 2 inches ~~ide and then into angular bloct~s is medium. 8urface runoff is medium, and tlie tO ~ incli thic~: ; neutrai. haza.rd of erosion is moderate. Tlio tei-ture of the upper subsoil is silty clay or clas. As ' Aiore than 95 percent of the acreage is cultivated • the nltich as 10 percent of sonle areas consists of Atliena, Naff, rest is farni woodlots. Wheat is the chief cash crop~ It Nea Perce, or Pn,louse soils. lis $rozvn in rotation with Peas and a manure cro This soil is «ell dri,ined and slowly permeable. It holds k~~ or in awhe,a,t-fa.llow rotation. Other erops grown are peas 9 cl or 1~ 10 l~sGic inclies h of en ~wet;ater thconsate plAnts queiitly, it can cti usen. be It cu is lti~- sticltecl ~il 1nd b~.rley; clover or alfalfa for haq or &reen manure; and ' . rnss for seed, h1y, or asture. Al~ grain a,nd gra,ss crol~s oiil~~ ~~itliin r~,ther narrow range of moisture content. ~ond to nitrogen. es respond to sulfur. (Cap~,- Root penehation is very deep. The fertility is ulediwn. bility unit IIIwood ~,nd group 5; not in a r~,nbe site) Surf~ce i-unoff is r~,Pid, and the hazard of furtlier erosion : f Freeman silt 5 to 20 percent slopes, severely ~~`'ei~e. loam, 1lore tliaii 95 percent of the acreage i.s cultiva,tecl; the eroded (FaB3).-DSore than 50 percent of the surface layer iest is seedecl to alfalfa or gra,ss. «rlieat is tlie chief crop. 'of tl~is soil has beeii removed by erosion. Fertility is me- dium to low. Surface runoff is ra, id tind the hazarci of Otlier crops gro~sn ~,re b~,rley and dry field pezs. ~11 erosion is severe. As inuch as 10 percent of some lrens erops respoiid to nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus. (Ca- consists of uneroded Freeman soils. pability unit IVe-3; not ui awooclland group or range site) ' The same croPs are grown as on Freeman silt loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes, but yields are lower. (CaPability wiit. Ga1'riSOti Se11e5 = IVe4; woodla.nd group 5; not in a range site) Tlie Cxtirrison series is made up o# somewhat eaceasii•e1y Freeman silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes, severely d1lined, gravelly or stony soils that formed uuder grass leroded (FaC3).-11Sore than 50 ty ercent of the surface l~.ser of this soil has been removed erosion. Surface ivnoff ill glACial outwash miaed in the upper pait with volcanic ' rapid, and the erosion hazard is severe. Included in asli. These soils tire on nearly level to moderately stee terraces. The ~.nnual pi-eciPitation is 18 to 22 inches, ancl fmThe apnug wei-e a fe~v areas of Dearyton soils. tl~e frost-f-~•ee ss~,son is about 170 days. same crops a,re grown as on Freeman silt loam, 5 soils of tlie Gtirrison series are used for avariety of to 20 percent slopes, but yields are lower. (Capability cro ~s a.nd ~,s f~,rmsteads and suburban lots. Ct I Ve-3; «oodl~,nnd group 5; not in rnnge site) arrison gravellp loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes (G9A).- This is the dominant soil in the Spokane Vtilley east of esh Water r Marsh the city of Spokane. Most slopes are between 2 and 5 Fresh water marsh (Fm) consists of shallow, swampy Percent. Reprnsentative Profile : Later onds and of fringes around lakes that have a flucttio to 15 inches, blac~, very friable gravelly loam ; granuiar level. The v tation consists of tules reeds and structure ; slightly acld. ~ > > 15 t o 44 i n c h e s, d u r k- b r m v n, f r i a b l e v e r y g r a v e lly l o a m ; n e u t r al• rushes. These areas are of little value for grazing, but 44 to 60 inches multicolored sand, grAVel, and cobblestones. , , SPOKANE COUNTY) Z'VAS~TGTO\ 19 ihe surface color, when inoist, ranges froin very dark the county. liost slopes are between 6 and 15 percent. ~vn to black. The teature of the surf~,ce layer is grav- R~epresenta.tive profile : e or very gr~,velly loam or silt loam. The subsoil ranges o to 13 incl~es, lilac~:, very friable silt loam; granuuu structnre ; i olor from darb brown to yello~visli brown. Cltiy ~.ncl neutraL lime h~ve accumultited on the laottom of the peUbles in tlie 13 to 62 inches, darl:-brotrn, firm loam tliut Ureal~s into prisms lower subsoil. The depth to the gravel suUstratum ranges 1 to 2 inches wide; stislitly mcid. f 30 to 55 inches. As much a,s 10 percent of soine areas 62 to 72 dark-Uro«n, friuble loain ; slightly acid. h In places tlie surface la,yer is very dark bro~vn. It is 10 ists of Bong or Phoebe soils or of other Ga~rrison soils. is s soil is soine«hat etcessively drained and lias niod- to 16 inches tliick. The testure of tlie subsoil ranges from :i•~tely rapid perineability. It llolds ~.Uout 5 inclies of silt loam to liglit silty clay loain. Froin 5 to 25 percent of *1e that p lants c.~,u use. It is e~,sy to «ork. Roots the lo«er suUsoil is composed of br~,vel aiid stones. As e to e layer of sa.ngr~,vel, and cobblestones. lnuch a, 5 percent of some areas consists of I3ernliill, ility is mediuin. Surface runoff is slow, and the Dea,t~~ton, or LarL-in soils. liazard of erosiou is slight. Tliis soil is well arlined and moclerltely pei-meable. It bout 80 perceut of the acrea.ge is cultivated; the rest is liolds 9 to 11 inches of 'wa,ter thlt plauts can use. It is u for grazing, ~.nd t~,s farmste~,ds or suburban lots. ~'~sy to ~cork. Root Penetr~,tion is very dee 1~. The fer- ~ pt of the acreage is irrigated. Irrigated nreas are used tility is hial~. Surface i-unoff is mediuin, and the h~rd for orcliard fruits and berries; ca.bbage, corn, ca,ntaloup, of erosion is nioderate. bers, celery, nnd squa,sh; 'wheat, oats, and bai•ley ; More tliln 90 perceiit of the 1creage is cultivated; tlie i fa for hay ; andg~•ass for seed and p~sture. Drylznd 1•est is gi~zed. l~~liet~t is tlie cliie# crop. It is grown in treas are used for n lieat, barley, and native bunchgrass. rotation «itli barley, oats, peas, lentils, alfalfa, or grass. I`here is no difficulty in the use of machinery, but tlie _AJ1 °rass and gi~in crops respond to nitronen; legunes el is hard on tillage imnlements. All crops eacept respond to sulfur. (CaPability unit IIIe-2; Uamy range ' es raspond to nitroben. Some crops respoiid to site; not in a, n-oodllndgroup) :u r, boron, and phos~phorus. (Capability unit IIIs-2; Glenrose silt loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes (GPA).-This o1my range site; not in a woodland group) soil lias a surface layer 2 to 4 inches tlucker than tlint of rrison gravelly loam, 5 to 20 percent siopes tGg61.- Glenrose silt loan, 5 t.o 24 percent slopes. Surface runoff I soil hns a surflce layer 3 to 5 inches thinner than that is slo~v, and tlie erosion haznrd is sli~ht. Included in niap- ) arrison gravelly loam, 0 to 5 percent slopes. Runoff PiNie ~~-ere sm~.ll 1i~ens of Ulilig and Dea.ryton 'soils. s medium2 nnd tlie erosion hazard is moder~.te. s1me crops aie gro«n ~.s on Glenrose silt loam, 5 us soil is used in much the same rray fLs Garrison to 20 percent slo pes; in additaon, ve~et~,bles ~,re gro~rn. r elly loam, 0 to 5 percent slol~es. (C1pnUility unit (CaP aility unit Ie-2; Loamy raige site; not in a. ~vood- : e-5; Loatny ra.nge site; not in a~~oodl~,nd group) land group) Garrison very gravelly loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes Glenrose silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes (GPC).-This ).-This soil has thinner, more bavelly surflce layer soil has a surflce lnyer 3 to 5 inches thuiner tlian tli~,t of h Garrison gravelly loAra, 0 to 5 percent slopes, and Glenrose silt loznl, 5 to 20 percent slopes. Surface runoff 10 less than 5 inches of water that pllnts c~tin use. The IS MPid, and the erosioii hazard is severe. About 5percent ;rnvel causes exti-eme wear on tillabe mlchinery. As of soine area,s consists of Bernhill and Dearyton soils. ~l ns 7 percent of sorae zreas consists of other Ga~rrisoii ''l~e same ci•ops Ri-e groivn ~ts on Glenrose silt loain, 5 to o (Capability uuit IV~-5; Shallotv rnnbe site; not `~0 gerceiit slopes, but inore of tlle acrea,ge is in grass and 11 n woodlInd group) ]e~umes. (Gapability unit IlIe-2; Loamy ranbe site; Garrison very stony loam, 0 to 20 percent slopes liot in awoodland group) i.-This soil liolds less th~.n 5 inclies of t~~ater tl~at Glenrose silt loam, 30 to 55 percent slopes (GpD).-This li ts c~►n use, and it is too stony to be cultivlted. As soitis stirface l~,yer 3 to 5 inches thinner than that of as 15 percent of some areas consists of other Garrison Glenrose silt lonm, 5 to 20 percent slopes. Surface ruii- oand as much a,s 2 percent is made up of granite off is rapid, aud tlie erosion hnztLrd is severe. AUout 3 , l~ercent of soule areas consists of Bernhill or Dea,ryton iis soil is used for graziiig. (Capability unit VIs-2; soils. Tliis soil is used only for gr~.zing. (Capability ~lin low range site; not in a`voodl~.nd group) unit VIe-1; Z~oi-t.li Ezposure r~,nge site; not in aNvood- land group) * t•ose SeY'ie5 Glenrose gravelly silt loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes (Gr6).-This soil holds from 7 to 9 inches of ~v~,ter th~.t ie Glenrose series consists of zvell-drained, mostly pl1-nts can use. Smtill areas of Bernhill and Dearyton ~ediuin-textured soils. These soils formed under mass soils mere included in inapping. ~i lttered pine trees in glacial till mixed in the upper This soil is n,ed in mucli tlie same way as Glenrose silt ~~•ith loess ~.nd ~~olclnic a.sh. Many lreas are ;r~,ti-e11~~ loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes, but yields are less. ( C~.p1- s oiiy. These soils nre nea,rly level to very steep. The bility unit I17"; Loamy range site; not in a woodland +»iunl precipitation is about 21 inches, and the frost-free bl•oup) n is alwut 135 d~,ys. Glenrose gravelly silt loam, 20 to 55 percent slopes enrose soils aie used for grain, peas, lentils, vegetables, (GrD).-This soil liolds 7 to 9 inches of iv~,ter thlt pl~,nts ~ 1 1 fa, and gi•ass, and for grazing. can iise. Surflce runoff is rapid, and the erosion hazard Glenrose silt loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes (Gp6).-This is severe. Included in mapping were area.s of Bernhill ~I ccurs on glaciafed uplands in the east-central part of silt loam, 30 to 55 percent slopes. ~ . , . . Y._~..~,~.,. . . ' , . • _ . . . _ . _ . " s... . ~ .~~T?s.' :li::~.. i_i{.;'~. r:.y.,.~s•.~..• arv.~c ' . . ! '~~~~i;'~r'i~:CrY~L-ii.'i'P~. ' 'S!•'; .t . . 174 SOIL SIIRVEY TABLE 6.--I3rief descriptiom of soils and t,li,eir 1 Classification Depth y Aiap Soil name Descriptiou of soil and site from ~ srcnbol surface ~ USDA texture In. OsC Drsgoon stony silt loam, 4 to 30 percent Similsu to Dragoon silt loain, 0 to 30 percent slopes. slopes, caccept that the sutfacc laycr is stony. Os0 Drugoon stony silt loam, 30 to 55 pcr- cent slopes. OvD Dragoon very rocky complca:, 20 to 55 Aragoon parL similar to llragoon silt loam, 0 to percent slopc:s. 30pc percent slopes, axccpt tllat depth to bed- rock r1»ges from 10 to '?U iuchcs. Rock ou; crop iiicliided iu tliis coiuplc.c. Ek6 Lloikusilt loum, 0 to 24 percent slopes. rsedium-tcxturcd, n•cll-dr:iincd soil formed froin U to 24 Silt loam_ glacial tilt coutaiuing a largc Amount of vol- ' cunic ash ia thc surfucc laycr; undcrlnin by 24 to 44 Gruvcllp loam_______ gravel at deptlt of 30 to GO inches; occupies 44 to 53 Very 6ruvelly sandp, uiidulltiiig, morlitirlikc topograpliy. lo:►m. ~ 53 to 60 Gravcl____________ EIC Eloika vcry stony silt laam, 0 to 30 pcr- Similar to Eloiks silt loam, Q tv 20 percent slone,s, . ccnt sloncs. except that they arc vcrv staiy throughout. E1D E loikn vcry stony silt loatn, 30 to 55 pcrccnt slopes. Em L•'uident silt loam. Mcdium-textured, soniewhat poorly drai»ed, U Lo ?G S:lt loani__________ alkaliiic so1 tormed in alhiviitm from calcar- eous silt, volcanic ash, and diatonite; depth 26 to 41 Very fine sa»dv to n-ater tnble fluctAiutes from near the surface loam. to about 6 fcec. 41 to 60 Sandy clay loam_:: Fa8 Frecroau silt loa►n, 5 to 20 pcrccAit Vcry decp, modcratcl< wcll draiiicd upland soils 0 to 22 Silt slopes. witli meditim-texttired surfacc luyer fuid medi- Fa63 Freeman silt loam, 5 to 20 percxait itm or moderately 5ne textared sulasoil; formed 22 to 72 Silty clay lolni___: slopcs, sevcrely crocicd. froiii silt ou rolling to hilly uplatids. - FaC3 Frcem:ui silt loam, 20 to 30 percent slopes, sevcrcly croded. Fm Ftcsh watcr marsh. ShalloW, s%rampti•, iutcrmittci►t ~~onds nnd fringes arouud ~lakes that h~tve n fluctuating : watcr tablc. Engincering dnt,1 is not given, ' • as 11nd t•}pe is too ~•ariable. . ' GaC3 GurGeld silty cltty loxm, Q t,o 30 perecut Cery deep, neil-cirained soil deve1oped in loass 0 to 8 Siltv cla~• loam_- slopes, sc.~crcly croded. on rid getops aiid kuolls oii thc rolling eo hitty 8 to 23 Siltc cl~►r_______: uplatids iii thc Palousc soii nrca. 23 to 60 SilLj• rlay ]osm__:- . GQA Gnrrison gravelly loam, 0 to 5 pcrccnt Gravelly, iucciiuin-testured, somcwhat cxccs- 0 to 15 Gravellr lo:iin___: ; slopes. sircly drnineci soils formeci in gravcll_y gliicial 15 to 44 Z'cry grix•cllr 1 . Gg6 Gnrrison grlvelly loam, 5 to 20 percent outwash mzterinl trom a vnriety of acid, 44 to 60 SAnd, grarcl, nnd. slopes. igueous pareat rocl:; on ne.lrlv icvel to rnod- cobblestones. : cr;itclv flopiug tcrraces; depLh to mixturc of ~ ' s,hiid, grnrcl, and coUblestoncs rnnges from 2'i to 5 feet. Gm6 G.trrison vciy grnvclly loam, 0 to 8 Simil:tr to G:irrison gr.ivclly Ioam, except that 0 to 15 Very gravelly 1. percent slopcs. thc stu•facc 11ycr is vcry gravclly. 15 to 44 Verv grnvelly t 94 to 60 Sand, grnvcl, and cobblestonm Gn8 Garrison vcry stony loarn, 0 to 20 Simil:ir to G.irri.coii gr:ivcliy lo:icn, except that ; pcrccnt slones. Llic suu•f:ice l:ivcr is vcry stoiiv. GpA Glenrosc silt loam, a to 5 percentslopes. Vcrv decp, mecliwu-tcxtured etl-drained soils 0 to 72 Silt loain_-----' Gp6 Glei►rose silt loam, 5 to20 pcrcentslopes. formed frotn acid i iicous g ~vlacial till; sucface GpC Clenrosc silt loam, 20 to 30 percent la~~er inHucaccci b~•~atss and volcanic ash, on slopes. gcntiv rolliiig to stc►ep uplands. Gp0 Glcnrosc silt loam, 30 to 55 pcrceiit slonr_S. , . . , . i . l:.f.v~{c.~~ ~~~~,r;f~l~~~7r !-•4f'~f~,a_~~ . , . , _ . + . ' • . • . - .y!~.::•'. r4.j'•-/''•~S~ J~ . . . ` . . • J ~ r • t ' SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 75 ~stim~d physicdl ccnd cltemica,l properties-Continued ~ Cil 6cation-Coutiuued Perceiitagc pa.ssing sic,,•c- Arailable I Permcabilit}• watcr Reaction Dispecsion Shrink-s%vell ~ IN o. 4 No. 10 No. 200 cnpncity (1:5 ditut,ion) potential ' AASHO (4.7 mui.) (2.0 mm.) (0.074 inm.) lu. ptr hr. In. ptr in, oJeoil p1/ ' I ~ Ci.---- A-4 S:i lu J:i 80 to 95 (iU to ?U U. S iu 15 0. li to Q. 211 (i. 1 to (i. i 11 i};1i I .oxv to ntod- S. A-4 ia to 8:~ 40 to 80 :i3 to :i(1 (1. S to 5 (l. 12 to Q. 14 rnit~. G. 1 to G. G lligli I.ow. A-2------ 30 to (iU 20 to 50 S to 15) 5.0 lo lll. tl Q. I)ii to (1. INI C. l to i. :i lli~;l~--• T.ow. A-l------ 2-5 to:i:i 1(1 la 2I) 0 to 5 >lU (l. 114 to i►. 06 ti. ti to 7. :i lligli------- I .o \1 CL---- A-4 `);i to lpll 90 to I00 90 to 9-5 Q. 8 to 15 (l. li to 0. 20 7. .4 to 9. Q lligh T.ow to mod- A-4------ Sl:i to 100 9(1 la lOO fil) to iO 0.8 l0 2.5 0. 17 to U. 20 ~ cr:itc~. i. 4 to S. 4 Aloclrratc--- I.ou. C A-6------ !);i to 100 DU to 95 85 to 90 U. 2 to A. 8 0. 17 to O. 211 G. G to i. :i I.o~~•------- \fodcratc. a1I,-CL---- A-4------ 95 to 100 90 to 100 80 to 90 (l. 2 to (l. 8 A. 17 to U. ?tl fi. fi to i. 3 \ic,clrr:at.r.--- Low I.o mod- c:r:►te. C A-G------ 95 to 100 90 to 100 80 to 90 <0. 05 0. 17 to 0. 30 G. fi to 7A T.ox~ riodcrntc. ' C A-6------ 95 to lOQ JO to 100 90 to 95 Q. 2 to 0.8 U. 17 to 0. 16 G. G t o i. 3 Low A'Iodcratc. ~ A-7------ 93 to 100 90 to lU(l SlA to 95 0. q:i to 0.2 U. 14 to A. 17 fi. fr to 7. 3 J.ow TTi61i. C A-G------ 93 to 100 SIU to lUU 00 to J;S 0.2 to 2.5 U. 17 to 0. •?ll f. G to 7. 3 Low _ Aiodcrnt.c. 01 A-4------ G;i to S:i 40 to RQ 35 to 50 0.8 to 3. 5 0. 12 to 0. 14 G. G to 7. 3 A'(oclcr:ttc I.otv. G A-2------ 45 to 65 30 to GO 5 to 15 2.5 to 5.0 U. 08 to 0. 10 G. G to i. 3 ModcruLc___ Low. G A-1------ 25 to 35 10 to 20 0 to b >10 U. 04 to 0. UG G. G to 7. 3 I•iibh------- Low, A-2------ 30 to GO 20 to 50 5 to 13 2.5 to 5. 0 0. 09 to 0. lU G. 1 to G. G A7odcrzte___ Low. - A-2------ 43 to 65 30 to 6(1 5 to 15 2.5 to 5. 0 U. Uti to Q. 1(1 G. G to 7.3 ~'iodcr:~te___ Low. ~'r-------- A-1------ 25 to 35 10 to 20 0 to 5 >10 0. 04 to 0. OG fs. G to 7. 3 I•(igh------- Low. ' I r V L'--- A-4------ SO to 95 75 to 95 GO to 85 0. 8 to 2. 5 0. 17 to 0.20 G. 1 to 7. 3 A'Ioderatc__ Low to moderate. t ~ ~ t- ~ . . . ' ' . . _ . . • ' , . t ' ' • ' . . : . . ' ` ^ . . - .i. _ . - . .f_~ 'r : . . i . • 92 so~ svRVEY TABLE 7.-Interpreta,tion of engiitE, Suitability as sourcc of- Soil fcatures affecting- Soil scrics or typc, Farm pon( anci mAp symbols Topsoil Sand t Grnvel ~ Road fill Highway location Dikes or lcvices Rescrroir a. Dragoon (OrC, Good to Not suit- Not suit- Fair to Moderate to very liigh Low stubiliLy; Moderate tc, DsC, OsD, poor: able. able. good. susceptibility to semipervious to moderatel. 7 pYp), frost actiou; mod- impcrvious rapid pen. erute to moderatcly when com- abilitA•. rapid permeability; Pzcted; low to low to modcratc iiiodcrntc shriiik-swcll shriiik-swcll : potential, potcntiul. Eloika (Ek6, EIC, Fair_Not suit- Suitlble at Good_____ Moderate to Iiigli sus- Low.:tr►bility; 114oderateto EI D). able. depth centibility to trost scinipcrvious tn rapid peri, i greater action; modcrutc Lo impcrvious ability. than GO v<sry rnpid pcrinc- wlicn compact- abiliLy• low to mod- ed; low to mod- crutc sfvink-swcll cratc si!rink- potentiul. swcll potcntill. Euuicnt silt loam Fair______ Not suita- Not suita- Poor_____ A'ecy higii susceptibil- Iow stahility; ini- Moderate to i (Em). ble. ble. ity to frost action; pcrvio»s wbeti moderati•I, modcrate to mod- comp.lctcd; loa• slo«• pcr,r: • cratcly Flow pcrmc- to moderatc ability. ubility• lo~~~ to mod- shri»k-s~~•cll cratc s~uink-swcll potcutial. pote»tial; satur;ttcd tn wintcr and spring. Freeman (FaB, Fair to Not sttita- Not suita- Poor_____ Moderate to very higli Moderate stabil- Dsoderatelt- • • FaB3, FaC3). poor, ble. ble. suscept+bility to ity; impercious to very :1( ; • frost action; inader- whan compact- permeabi?=. ' aLely slow to very ed; low to mod- slow permeability; erate shrink- . low to moderate swelt potential; ~ shrink-swell poteii- soils crack when tial; stttiirated in dry. spring. Garfield (GaC3)___ Fair to NOt suita- Not suitu- Poor_____ Moderate to very liigli Moderate stabil- Moderate to j good. ble. ble. susceptibility to frest ity; impervious slon pern, action; moderute to wlicti compact- abilit_y. slow permeability; ed; moderate to moderate to high high shrink- ~ shrink-s«•ell poten- swell potential. ~ ~ i tial. ~ Garrison (GgA, ~'sir----- Not suit- Gaod below Exccllent_ Sliglit to no suscepti- Moderate stabil- Moderate to : ~ Gg6, Gm6, able. surface bility to frost action; ity , pervious %•er~* rapi( Gn6). layer. modcratc to very whon com- pcrmeabili rapid permeability; pacted; low !ow shrink-swcll shrink-swell potential. potential. See footnote at end oP table. i ; d I I , - . . ' • . • • . ; . . . • {i r~~..~s.;Yas~ , • • . . . . . . , . . . . ~ _ . ''•`'r . ! SPOBANE covVIrr, WessINcTON -93 ~ : Properties of soils-Continued , i . Soil fcntures affecting-Continucd Fnrm ponds- Culitinucd Agriculturul Tcrrn.ccs and Scwuge disposal drniuage Irrigation diversions Watenrays ficlds Trafficability ~ rQlUa1tl;mcnt + • ~ry lov~ she.' ?~IoderaLc to 11~foderztc in- T,o~v resistancc Lo«~ resistance to ~Lodcrate to Vcry low shcnr Wngth; semi- moderately tul:c r1tc; to crosion; crosiai; inod- modcrately strength; low perviolts Lo lm- rapid perine- modcratc moderAtC to crntc wntcr- rnpid pcrmc- load-currying pcnnoUs n-hen ability. w:►Lcr-holding modcratcht holding capsc- lbility; mod- cuplcity; conipactcd; nte- cnpacity. rlpici pcrme- iLy:vcgatsttioit cr:itc to ji od- moderate t,o ditim COi"pras_ .ibility. difficutt to crltcly rlpid moclcrately iuilit.v. lolv estal:lisli except «atcr-lioldiug rapid perme- ~ ~tn1iili~~'• on 1)ragoon can1c;ty. sbilit.y. sitt lo1m. n• shcar strength; Moderatc to A4oderatc; to Afodcntte resist- rfodrr.itc resist- \fodcrltc to Low slielr twrnipcrvious to vcry rzpicl moderntcly aiicc to cro• ancc to crosion; i•cry rupid strcugth • mod- unpervious when perincability. rapid intu.ke sion; rnodcr- moderntc water- pcrmesibilitv; erute to hish ,,cotnpacted; slight ratc; moclcr- :ttc to vcrr liolding ca- modcraLe laad-carrying coniprembiLtY; atc n:itcr- r.ipid pcrnic- plcit•r; vr.gcta- watcr-lsolding capacity; mad- low stabilikv. holding ca- nbility. tiou c1i(iicult to cnplcity, cratc to x•ery p;icity. rstablisli cxcept rnpid pcrmc- oji rloika si1C ability. loam. crr• tou' sluear 'Modc:r:itc to A•fodr.r.itc to Moclcrltc re;ist- \Iotlcratc i-esist- \Iodcruw, to Ifcry low shear si.rcugl,h; impcr- mocit.r:itcly inodcrn.tcly uncc to cro- ancc to crosiou; uioclc,rately sGrength; mod- +Vtiaus when coni- slo«• pcrmc- slow int,lkc sion; inodcr- vcry liigh w:itrr- s1ow pc.nnc- crute to low pmcted; moderat.e ability; &ntu- ratc; verv ate to nioder- liol(lilig cap;ic- riUility;vcry load-carrying ~,p htgh compmss- r:►ted in win- liigh wntcr- atcly clow itc; cscepL for higli wnCrr-hold- clpncity; mod- tbilit~~; modcrate tcr ancl holding ca- pcrmcability. salt•tolcr.int iiig caplcity; cratc to mod- ~bilitq; cracks spritig. pacitv. specics, vcgeta- saturateci in crat,cly slo%v Kbcn dn~. tion difficult t4o wiiiter Anci pcrincubility. ` establisli. spring. low sl►car Modcrat,cly Moderatcly rsodcrntc resist- ?liodcrntc resist- r'Iodcrntcly Vcry low shear dtrngLh; iinpcr- slo« to very slow to slow ancc to ero- nuce to crosion; slow to vcry strength; mod- . vlous ahen com- slocv pcrmc- intake rnte; sion; niodcr- very liigh water- slow pcime- cra,te load- paeted; mediinn abilitv; satu- very high ately slow to holdiiig caplc- nbility; very cnrrying ca- eompressibilitv; rated in «•ater-holdino vcrv slon- pcr- ity; vegetation higli water- pacity; mod- taodcratc sttibil- spring. capacity. mc.tbility. i1ir1y casy to liolding ca- cratcly, slow to lty; soils crnck estat~lish. pacity; satu • very slo~v . ~nc~a drv. rfltcd in pcrmcability. ' spring. irit lo~rshc~ar AToder~►tc to Sloi~t iuGakc AZoderltc resist- ~ioderatc resist• I~iodcrate to Vcry low shear AgiL; inipcr- sloa~ pccmc- r:ite; very ancc to cro- nncc to crosion; slo~v permc- stren th; mod. ouu~~•h~:u com- ability. high watcr- sioii; uioder- vcry high ability; vcry erate~oad- psctcc(; tn(•<lil►in to holding ca- atc to slow «'1tcr.liolding high watcr- carrying ca- Wtb comprcasibil- pacity. permeability. capacity; holding c1- pacity; mod- Ily' tnod~.ratc vegetatioii pacity. ecate to slow Ka~iliLy; so~l fnirlv c.1s~i ~ to permeability. en►cka at:c+► dr~t, estaUlisli. tLb shcarsl,rength; AZodei-itte to Itapid iiitti.kc Modcrate resist- AZoderatc resist- Moderate to High shea.r pervioue xvhen rcry rapid r~te; modcr- ance to cro- ancc to crosion; very rapid strength; high ftaPact~i; slight pernncability. ate to low sion; moder- modernte to low pcrmeability; load-carrying ~p mssil)ility' • tivater-holding ate to ver3 ~~•ater-holding moderate to capacity; modrrulc cxpacity. rnpid perine- alplci6y; vege- low water- raoderate to lb[Uty, abilit.~•. t.i.io~~ difficult liolding ca- very rapid to establish on pa,city, permeability. very stony lo:Lrn, fair1y e-uy on othcr soils. } O • i~~1} ~ • Appendix B Hydrologic and Hydraulic Calculations ~cn . , d • . - o • . d , Qtiality DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, ' ' ' . 208 Calculations SWALE A (2.5' x 25') ' 208 Volume Required: ~ 1,212 S.F. ACP/24 = 51 C.F. 208 Volume Provided: (0.5') (62.5 S.F.) + (0.375 C.F./L.F.) (55 L.F.) ~ = 52 C.F. Storm Volume Provided: ' ' _ (0.67') (62.5 S.F.) + (0.67 C.F./L.F.) (55 L.F.) = 79 C.F. ' SWALE B (6' x 19') 208 Required: 1619 S.F. ACP/24 = 67 C.F. 208 Provided: (0.5') (114 S.F.) +(0.25 C.F./L.F.) (50 L.F.) = 70 C.F. Storm Volume Provided: , _ (0.67') (114 S.F.) + (0.45 C.F./L.F.) (50 L.F.) = 99 C.F. , SWALE C (2.5' x 30') 208 Volume Required: 1464 S.F. ACP/24 = 61 C.F. 208 Volume Provided: ~ (0.5') (75 S.F.) + (0.375 C.F./L.F.) (65 L.F.) = 94 C.F. Storm Volume Provided: (0.67') (75 S.F.) + (0.67 C.F./L.F.) (65 L.F.) = 94 C.F. Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision Appendix B 1 MAHAOOT/DRAI N REP713. DOC 07114/89 , SWALE D 6' x 16' ~ ) 208 Volume Required: 1406 S.F. ACP/24 = 59 C.F. 208 Volume Provided: (0.5') (96 S.F.) + (0.25 C.F./L.F.) (44 L.F.) = 59 C.F. Storm volume provided: (0.67') (96 S.F.O + (0.45 C.F./L.F.) (44 L.F.) = 84 C.F. SWALE E (2.5' X 45') 208 Volume Required: - 21192 S.F. ACP/24 = 91 C.F. 208 Volume Provided: (0.5') (112.5 S.F.) + (0.375 C.F./I,.F.) (95 L.F.) = 92 C.F. Storm Volume Provided: (0.67') (112.5 S.F.) + (0.67 C.F./L.F.) (95 L.F.) = 139 C.F. SWALE F (6' X 30') 208 Volume Required: 21597 S.F. ACP/24 = 108 C.F. ' 208 Volume Provided (0.5') (180 S.F.) + (0.25 C.F./L.F.) (72 L.F.) = 108 C.F. Storm volume provided (0.67') (180 S.F.) + (0.45 C.F./L.F.) (72 L.F.) = 152 C.F. Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision Appendix B 2 MAHAOOT/DRAI N REP713. DOC 07/14/99 1 , ' SWALE G(Identica1 to Swale H) 208 Volume Required: 3,690 S.F. ACP/24 = 154 C.F. 208 Volume Provided: - , (0.5') (309 S.F.) + (0.375 C.F./L.F.) (85 L.F.) = 186 C.F. Storm volume provided: (0.67') (9309 S.F.) + (0.67 C.F./L.F.) (85 L.F.) 263 C.F. , ' , i Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision Appendix B 3 MAHAOOT/DRAINREP713.DOC 07l14/99 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DETENTION BAS1N DESIGN PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 BAS1N: 1 ' NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. 1 Singie (type A) 0 Double (type B) DATE: 13-Ju1-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H 1) 0.37 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H I) 6.83 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H 1) 0.40 Time of Conc. (min) 6.83 Area (Acres) 0.3708 C' Factor 0.40 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) 0 Volume Provided 208: 0 storm: 178 Outflow (cfs) 03 Area * C" Factor 0.15 #1 #2 #3 94 #5 #G #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in.lhr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 1 *60) (A*C*#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 6.83 409.54 2.84 0.42 231 122.86 108 5 300 3.18 0.47 190 90 100 10 600 2.24 0.33 246 180 66 15 900 1.77 0.26 273 270 3 20 1200 1.45 0.22 288 360 -72 25 1500 1.21 0.18 294 450 -156 30 1800 1.04 0.15 299 540 -241 35 2100 0.91 0.13 302 630 -328 40 2400 0.82 0.12 309 720 -411 45 2700 0.74 0.11 312 810 -498 50 3000 0.68 0.10 317 900 -583 55 3300 0.64 0.09 326 990 -664 ' 60 3600 0.61 0.09 338 1080 =742 65 3900 0.60 0.09 359 1170 81 l 70 4200 0.58 0.09 373 1260 -887 75 4500 0.56 0.08 385 1350 -965 80 4800 0.53 0.08 388 1440 -1052 85 5100 0.52 0.08 404 1530 -1 l 26 90 5400 0.50 0.07 411 1620 -1209 ' 95 5700 0.49 0.07 424 1710 -1286 100 6000 0.48 0.07 437 1800 -1363 DR.AINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Grassy swale '208' pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in./ft. = required: 0 cu. ft. provided: 0 cu. ft. NO GOOD DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum storage by Bowstring = required: 108 cu. ft. provided: 178 cu. ft. OK! Number and type of drywells required = 1 SINGLE 0 DOUBLE ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 DATE. 13-Ju1-99 BASIN: 1 ' TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) Surface Areas liCit Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Description (acres) Ct = 0.15 L2 = 0 Grass, House, Road 0.3708 0.40 Z 1= 0 0.0000 0.00 L 1(A) = 145 Z2 = 0 0.0000 0.00 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.0000 0.00 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0 0.0000 0.00 s = 0 0.0000 0.00 Tc (A) = 6.83 d= 0 0.0000 0.00 Totai A Comp "C" L 1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.00 0.37 0.40 N(B) = 0.016 Tc(A+B) = 6.83 S(B) = 0.008 Q=C*I*A= 0.42 Tc(tot.) = 6.83 Q(est.) = 0.00 Tc (B) = 0.0 lntensity = 2.84 A= 0 WP = #DIV/0! R = #DIV/0! V = #DIV/0! Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) _ #DIV/0! Tc (overland) = Ct*(L1 *N/S^0.5)^0.6) Q(est) _ #DIV/0! Ct=0.15 L 1= Length of Overland Flow Holding = 0.00 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average stope of overland flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch ' Z 1= inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch d= depth of Flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Elow) Area = d*B+d^2/2*(Z 1+Z2) Wetted perimeter = B*d+(1/sin(am(1/Z1))+l/sin(atn(1/Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter ' Velocity = 1.486/n*R^.667*s^.5 Flow = Velocity*Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s= iongitudinal slope of gutter ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DETENTION BASIN DESIGN PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 BASIN: 2 ' NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. 0 Single (type A) 1 Double (type B) DATE: 13-1u1-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H 1) 0.57 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H 1) 8.65 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H 1) 0.40 Time of Conc. (min) 8.65 Area (Acres) 0.5672 C' Factor 0.40 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) 24707.232 Volume Provided 208: 0 storm: 178 Outflow (cfs) 1 Area * C" Factor 0.23 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (#1*60) (A*C*#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 8.65 518.73 2.49 0.57 393 518.73 -125 5 300 3.18 0.72 290 300 -10 10 600 2.24 0.51 395 600 -205 15 900 1.77 0.40 432 900 -468 20 1200 1.45 0.33 453 1200 -747 25 1500 1.21 0.27 460 1500 -1040 30 1800 1.04 0.24 466 1800 -1334 35 2100 0.91 0.21 470 2100 -1630 40 2400 0.82 0.19 479 2400 -1921 45 2700 0.74 0.17 483 2700 -2217 50 3000 0.68 0.15 490 3000 -2510 55 3300 0.64 0.15 505 3300 -2795 ' 60 3600 0.61 0.14 523 3600 -3077 65 3900 0.60 0.14 555 3900 3345 70 4200 0.58 0.13 576 4200 -3624 ' 75 4500 0.56 0.13 594 4500 -3906 80 4800 0.53 0.12 598 4800 -4202 85 5100 0.52 0.12 622 5100 4478 90 5400 0.50 0.11 633 5400 -4767 95 5700 0.49 0.11 653 5700 -5047 100 6000 0.48 0.11 673 6000 -5327 DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Grassy swale '208' pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.S in./ 12 in./ft. = required: 1029 cu. ft. provided: 0 cu. ft. NO GOOD DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum storage by Bowstring = required: - l0 cu. ft. provided: 178 cu. ft. OK! Number and type of drywells required = 0 SINGLE 1 DOUBLE , DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 DATE: 13-Ju1-99 BASIN: 2 ' TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) Surface Areas fiCto Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Description (acres) Ct = 0.15 L2 = 0 Grass, House, Road 0.5672 0.40 Z 1= 0 0.0000 0.00 L 1(A) = 215 Z2 = 0 "0.0000 0.00 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.0000 0.00 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0 0.0000 0.00 s = 0 0.0000 0.00 Tc (A) = 8.65 d= 0 0.0000 0.00 Total A Comp "C" L 1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.00 0.57 0.40 N(B) = 0.016 Tc(A+B) = 8.65 S(B) = 0.008 Q=C*I*A= 0.57 Tc(tot.) = 8.65 Q(est.) = 0.00 Tc (B) = 0.0 Intensity = 2.49 A= 0 WP = #DIV/0! R = #DIV/0! V = #DIV/0! Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) _ #DIV/0! Tc (overland) = Ct*(L 1 *N/S^0.5)^0.6) Q(est) _ #D1V/0! Ct = 0.15 L 1= Lengtll of Overiand Flow Holding = 0.00 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overland flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)/Velocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z 1= inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) Area = d*B+d^2/2*(Z1+Z2) Wetted perimeter = B* d+(1 /sin(atn(1 /Z 1))+ 1/sin(atn(1 /Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity = 1.486/n*R^.667*s^.5 Flow = Velociry*Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s= longitudinat slope of gutter ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DETENT[ON BASIN DESIGN PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 BASIN: 3 ' NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. 0 Single (type A) 1 Double (type B) DATE: 13-Ju1-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H 1) 0.72 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H 1) 9.07 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H1) 0.40 Time of Conc. (min) 9.07 Area (Acres) 0.7238 C' Factor 0.40 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) 0 Volume Provided 208: 0 storm: 291 Outflow (cfs) 1 Area * C" Factor 0.29 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage lnc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 1 *60) (A*C*#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 9.07 544.37 2.41 0.70 510 544.37 -34 5 300 3.18 0.92 370 300 70 10 600 2.24 0.65 509 600 -91 15 900 1.77 0.51 556 900 -344 20 1200 1.45 0.42 581 1200 -619 25 1500 1.21 0.35 590 1500 -910 30 1800 1.04 0.30 598 1800 -1202 35 2100 0.91 0.26 602 2100 -1498 40 2400 0.82 0.24 614 2400 - l 786 45 2700 0.74 0.21 618 2700 -2082 50 3000 0.68 0.20 627 3000 -2373 55 3300 0.64 0.19 646 3300 -2654 ' 60 3600 0.61 0.18 668 3600 -2932 65 3900 0.60 0.17 710 3900 -3190 70 4200 0.58 0.17 736 4200 -3464 75 4500 0.56 0.16 760 4500 -3740 80 4800 0.53 0.15 765 4800 -4035 85 5100 0.52 0.15 796 5100 -4304 90 5400 0.50 0.14 808 5400 -4592 95 5700 0.49 0.14 835 5700 -4865 100 6000 0.48 0.14 860 6000 -5140 DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Grassy swale '208' pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in.lft. = required: 0 cu. ft. provided: 0 cu. tt. NO GOOD DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum storage by Bowstring = required: 70 cu. ft. provided: 291 cu. tt. OK! Number and type of drywelis required = 0 SINGLE 1 DOUBLE ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 DATE: 13-Ju1-99 BASIN: 3 1 li TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) Surface Areas C„ Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Description (acres) Ct = 0.15 L2 = 0 Grass, House, Road 0.7238 0.40 Z 1= 0 0.0000 0.00 L 1(A) = 233 Z2 = 0 0.0000 0.00 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.0000 0.00 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0 0.0000 0.00 s = 0 0.0000 0.00 Tc (A) = 9.07 d= 0 0.0000 0.00 Total A Comp "C" L 1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.00 0.72 0.40 ' N(B) = 0.016 Tc(A+B) = 9.07 S(B) = 0.008 Q=C*I*A= 0.70 Tc(tot.) = 9.07 Q(est.) = 0.00 ' Tc (B) = 0.0 Intensity = 2.41 A= 0 WP = #DIV/0! R = #DIV/0! V = #DIV/0! Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) _ #DIV/0! Tc (overland) = Ct*(L 1 *N/S^0.5)^0.6} Q(est) _ #DIV/0! Ct=0.15 LI = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 0.00 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overland flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z 1= inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) ' Area = d*B+d^2/2*(Zl+Z2) Wetted perimeter = B*d+(1 /sin(atn(1 /Z 1))+l /sin(aM(1 /Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter ' Velocity = 1.486/n*R^.667*s^.5 Fiow = Velocity*Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s= longitudinal slope of gutter 1 ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DETENTION BASIN DESIGN PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 BASIN: 4 ' NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED DES[GNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. 0 Single (type A) 1 Double (type B) DATE: 13-Ju1-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H 1) 1.08 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H 1) 8.65 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H 1) 0.40 Time of Conc. (min) 8.65 Area (Acres) 1.0822 C' Factor 0.40 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) p Volume Provided 208: 0 storm: 0 ' Outflow (cfs) 1 Area * C" Factor 0.43 ' #1 92 #3 94 #5 #6 #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. . (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) 1 *60) (A*C*#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 8.65 518.73 2.49 1.08 751 518.73 232 5 300 3.18 1.38 553 300 253 10 640 2.24 0.97 753 600 153 15 900 1.77 0.77 825 900 -75 20 1200 1.45 0.63 864 1200 -336 25 1500 1.21 0.52 878 1500 -622 30 1800 1.04 0.45 890 1800 -910 35 2100 0.91 0.39 897 2100 -1203 40 2400 0.82 0.35 915 2400 -1485 45 2700 0.74 0.32 921 2700 -1779 50 ` 3000 0.68 0.29 935 3000 -2065 55 3300 0.64 0.28 963 3300 -2337 ' 60 3600 0.61 0.26 997 3600 -2603 65 3900 0.60 0.26 1059 3900 -2841 70 4200 0.58 0.25 1099 4200 -3101 ' 75 4500 0.56 0.24 1134 4500 -3366 80 4800 0.53 0.23 1142 4800 -3658 85 5100 0.52 0.23 1188 5100 -3912 90 5400 0.50 0.22 1207 5400 -4193 ' 95 5700 0.49 0.21 1246 5700 -4454 100 6000 0.48 0.21 1283 6000 -4717 DRAINAGE POND CAI.CULATIONS Grassy swale'208' pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in./ft. = required: 0 cu. ft. provided: 0 cu. ft. NO GOOD DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM ' Maximum storage by Bowstring = required: 253 cu. ft. provided: 0 cu. ft. NO GOOD Number and type of drywells required = 0 SINGLE 1 DOUBLE ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 DATE: 13 Jul 99 BASIN: 4 ' TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) Surface Areas "C" Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Description (acres) Ct = 0.15 L2 = 4 Grass, House, Road 1.0822 0.40 Z 1= 0 0.0000 0.00 L 1(A) = 215 Z2 = 0 0.0000 0.00 ' N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.0000 0.00 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0 0.0000 0.00 s = 0 0.0000 0.00 Tc (A) = 8.65 d= 0 0.0000 0.00 Total A Comp "C" L 1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.00 1.08 0.40 N(B) = 0.016 Tc(A+B) = 8.65 S(B) = 0.008 Q=C*I*A= 1.08 Tc(tot.) = 8.65 Q(est.) = 0.00 ' Tc (B) = 0.0 Intensiry = 2.49 _ A 0 WP= #DIV/0! , R = #DIV/0! V = #DIV/0! Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) _ #DIV/0! Tc (overland) = Ct*(L1 *N/S^0.5)^0.6} Q(est) _ #D1V/0! Ct = 0.15 L1 = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 0.00 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overland flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)/Velocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch ' Zl = inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 mverse of cross slope nvo of ditch d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) ' Area = d*B+d^2/2*(Z1+Z2) Wetted perimeter = B*d+(1 /sin(atn(1 /Z 1))+1 /sin(atn(1 /Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velociry = 1.486/n*R^.667*s^.5 Flow = Velocity*Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s= longitudinal slope of gutter 1 ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES . , BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DETENT'ION BAS[N DESIGN PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 BASIN: SG ' NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. 0 Single (rype A) 1 Double (type B) DATE: 13 Jul 99 Total Area (calc.) (see H 1) 0.68 ' Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H 1) 7.77 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H 1) 0.40 Time of Conc. (min) 7.77 Area (Acres) 0.6794 C' Factor 0.40 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) 0 Votume Provided 208: 0 storm: 263 ' Outflow (cfs) 1 Area * C" Factor 0.27 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage [nc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (#l *60) (A*C*#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 7.77 466.27 2.66 0.72 451 466.27 -15 5 300 3.18 0.86 347 300 47 10 600 2.24 0.61 462 600 -138 ' 15 900 1.77 0.48 509 900 -391 20 1200 1.45 0.39 535 1200 -665 25 1500 1.21 0.33 545 1500 -955 30 1800 1.04 0.28 554 1800 -1246 35 2100 0.91 0.25 559 2100 -1541 40 2400 0.82 0.22 570 2400 -1830 45 2700 0.74 0.20 575 2700 -2125 50 3004 0.68 0.18 584 3000 -2416 55 3300 0.64 0.17 602 3300 -2698 ' 60 3600 0.61 0.17 623 3600 -2977 65 3900 0.60 0.16 662 3900 -3238 70 4200 0.58 0.16 687 4200 -3513 ' 75 4500 0.56 0.15 709 4500 -3791 80 4800 0.53 0.14 714 4800 4086 85 5100 0.52 0.14 743 5100 -4357 90 5400 0.50 0.14 755 5400 -4645 ' 95 5700 0.49 0.13 780 5700 -4920 100 6000 0.48 0.13 803 6000 -5197 DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Grassy swale'208' pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in./ft. = required: 0 cu. ft. provided: 0 cu. ft. NO GOOD DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum storage by Bowstring = required: 47 cu. ft. provided: 263 cu. ft. OK! Number and type of drywells required = 0 SINGLE 1 DOUBLE ' DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 DATE: 13-Ju1-99 BASIN: SG TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) Surface Areas "C" Tc (overiand) Tc (gutter) Description (acres) Ct = 0.15 L2 = 0 Grass, House, Road 0.6794 0.40 Z 1= 0 0.0000 0.00 L 1(A) = 180 Z2 = 0 0.0000 0.00 ' N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.0000 0.00 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0 0.0000 0.00 s = 0 0.0000 0.00 Tc (A) = 7.77 d= 0 0.0000 0.00 Total A Comp "C" L 1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.00 0.68 0.40 N(B) = 0.016 Tc(A+B) = 7.77 S(B) = 0.008 Q=C*I*A= 0.72 Tc(tot.) = 7.77 Q(est.) = 0.00 Tc (B) = 0.0 Intensity = 2.66 A= 0 WP = #DIV/0! R = #DIV/O! V = #DIV/O! Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) _ #DIV/O! Tc (overland) = Ct*(L 1 *N/S^0.5)^0.6) Q(est) _ #DIV/O! Ct=0.15 ' L1 = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 0.00 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overland flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z i= inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) ' Area = d*B+d^2/2*(Zl+Z2) Wetted perimeter = B*d+(1 /sin(atn(1 /Z 1))+ 1/sin(atn(1 /Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity= 1.486/n*R^.667*s^.5 ' Flotiv = Velocity*Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s =longitudinal slope of gutter 1 , DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DETENTION BASIN DESIGN PROJECT NO: MAHA0005 BASIN: SH ' NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. 0 Singie (type A) 1 Double (type B) DATE: 13-Ju1-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H 1) 0.68 ' Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H 1) 8.88 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H 1) 0.40 Time of Conc. (min) 8.88 Area (Acres) 0.6794 C' Factor 0.40 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) p Volume Provided 208: 0 storm: 263 ' Outflow (cfs) 1 Area C" Factor 0.27 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. ' (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (#1*60) (A*C*#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 8.88 533.07 2.45 0.67 476 533.07 -58 5 300 3.18 0.86 33 47 300 47 10 600 2.24 0.61 476 600 -124 15 900 1.77 0.48 520 900 -380 20 1200 1.45 0.39 544 1200 -656 25 1500 1.21 0.33 553 1500 -947 30 1800 1.04 0.28 560 1800 - l 240 35 2100 0.91 0.25 564 2100 -1536 40 2400 0.82 0.22 575 2400 -1825 45 2700 0.74 0.20 579 2700 -2121 50 3000 0.68 0.18 588 3000 -2412 55 3300 0.64 0.17 605 3300 -2695 ' 60 3600 0.61 0.17 627 3600 -2973 65 3900 0.60 0.16 665 3900 -3235 70 4200 0.58 0.16 691 4200 -3509 75 4500 0.56 0.15 712 4500 -33 788 80 4800 0.53 0.14 717 4800 4083 85 5100 0.52 0.14 746 5100 4354 90 5400 0.50 0.14 758 5400 4642 ' 95 5700 0.49 0.13 783 5700 4917 100 6000 0.48 0.13 806 6000 -5194 DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Grassy swale'208' pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in./ft. = required: 0 cu. ft. provided: 4 cu. ft. NO GOOD DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STOIZM Maximum storage by Bowstring = required: 47 cu. ft. provided: 263 cu. ft. OK! Number and type of drywells required = 0 SINGLE 1 DOUBLE DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES ' PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS DESIGNER: DOUG BUSKO, P.E. PROJECT NO. MAHA0005 DATE. 13-Ju1-99 BASIN: SH , TIME OF CONCENTRATION (min) Surface Areas loCio Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Description (acres) Ct = 0.15 L2 = 0 Grass, House, Road 0.6794 0.40 Z 1= 0 0.0000 0.00 L l(A) = 225 Z2 = 0 0.0000 0.00 ' N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.0000 0.00 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0 0.0000 0.00 s = 0 0.0000 0.00 Tc (A) = 8.88 d= 0 • 0.0000 0.00 Total A Comp "C" L 1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.00 0.68 0.40 N(B) = 0.016 Tc(A+B) = 8.88 S(B) = 0.008 Q=C*I*A= 0.67 Tc(tot.) = 8.88 Q(est.) = 0.00 Tc (B) = 0.0 lntensity = 2.45 A= 0 WP = #DIV/0! R = #DI V/0! V = #DIV/0! Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) _ #DIV/0! Tc (overland) = Ct*(L 1 *N/S^0.5)^0.6) Q(est) _ #DIV/0! Ct = 0.15 Ll = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 0.00 N= friction factor of overland Flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overland flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)/Velocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z 1= inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) ' Area = d*B+d^2/2*(Zl+Z2) Wetted perimeter = B*d+(1/sin(atn(1/Z1))+1/sin(atn(1/Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity = 1.486/n*R^.667*s^.5 Flow = Velocity*Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s = longitudinal slope of gutter ' ' ' ~ PEAK FLOW CALCULATIONS (ROAD AREA ONLY) Q= CiA Assumes: C= 0.9, i= 3.18 in./hr. Basin A, Acres Q, cfs A 0.028 0.08 B 0.037 0.11 C 0.034 0.10 D 0.032 0.09 E 0.050 0.14 F 0.060 0.17 G 0.085 0.24 H 0.085 0.24 ' Drainage Report for Bradley Heights Subdivision 1 MAHAOOT/DRAINREP713.DOC 07/14/99 Worksheet ' Worksheet for Triangular Channel ' Project Description Project File s:\engrlmaha0005\basinf.fm2 6'~~ 1,,V IZ' Worksheet gutter Flow Element Triangular Channel Method Manning's Formula Solve For Channel Depth ' Input Data Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Channel Slope 0.005800 ff/ft ' Left Side Slope 12.350000 H: V Right Side Slope 0.167000 H: V Discharqe 0.17 cfs Results Depth 0.14 ft Flow Area 0.12 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 1.86 ft Top Width 1.74 ft Critical Depth 0.14 ft Critical Slope 0.006616 ft/ft Velocity 1.41 fUs Velocity Head 0.03 ft Specific Energy 0.17 ft Froude Number 0.94 ' Flow is subcritical. ' 1 1 07/13/99 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES FlowMaster v5.08 11:25:27 AM Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 Page 1 of 1 ' - OEPTH OF FLOW - y- FEET 0• / 7 c~'3 •01 •02 .03 .04 .03 .06 .08 .10 .2 .3 .4 .3 .6 .7 .8 .9 I.O 1.0 Li .e 4- --r 6 - ~ ~ T - j j j ~ 4--1 +-r I ~ r -T-T ~ .s L I I ~ ~f 1 Tt ~ .3 ' r I . I ( I .2 . oa L a .io i ~ ; G~,~y o• ~ o•~ 9 I ~.oe G I I ; j L 1 ~ H .os a i .OS 049 • Z . .03 0V-~ I-~ j i ~ i~_.__~"'1J."'1' t~ i i, ~ I ~ i i i I( I I + .02 i i Z/ii~i_ ~ t~ ~ ~ li I ~ i I I j i ~ I ~ ~ j I ~ 1 ( I 1 I I I L I I I I i~ ~ i~ . .oi III I 1 + 1.0 .e ' i I 1 ( o) OISCHARGE PER FOOT OF ~ ~ w ~ LENGTH OF CURB OPENING .s INLETS WHEN INTERCEPTING ; .s 100 % OF GUTTER FL.OW - - ~ - - + -t- -i • .4 ~ - - - - - - - 4 - 4 ' 0 (b) PARTIAL INTERCEPTI ON i 6 s ~ ~ ~ I I 3 oo RATIO FOR INLETS OF - p~ -~r--~ -~-1- LENGTH LESS THAN La , j /.o ~ - i - - -4- -z OOF . i 0 _ ~ti• ~ . --,--r~o .03 .06 .08 .10 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .8 1.0 . . L/La CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS ON CONTINUOUS GRAOE 6-39 FIGURE 16 ~ ♦ ; 1Q 3 v ~2 S 1.0 . . 2 1t b 10 ~ t.5 H .a u- 9 Z i T t~' Z / 0 4~• r 1.0 6 w 7.3 cr. .9 W O' ~ N j.o ~ Vt,c ~ Z 0 1 ' 6.5 W .7 1 a 4 ? .8 O J ~ O ,S,S ~ 1 i _ W V.4 ~ 0 • p y J Z a ~ U. O ♦ V. ~ ~ Q .3 3.s j Z .aa Z uia. '06 a •2s O O ~ U. ZS O 0 04 ~f YI U. ~ a: 0~i. = 2.S Q. ° ~ AZ 4. .2 yr„ p t~ 0 Q ~ Q ' Q t~ cr. ~ . cuaa 13 LO.1 ' • . . ~ ( 0 ~ LpCA` OvpilESS~QN ~s of CoRg _ POINTS 0 R CAPA ~ F_ ~ pC,RApN pT t-Ow OM T 5 ~ - pEN%NG tN~-E._--- ~ 4 'z4 .1 1.2 f , GuRE ~ PueLIc R°°'°s o• 'fON, G. gUaEAU ~TWO. ''1A`'H1NG oivlsto" 6_41 , Appendix C Site Photos ~cn . , • Pi-ofessioiials • dirig Quality DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, - ~ F ~ A,~~ ~ H . ~ ~w~u ~ ~ . X.~•~..'>A . ~ I • Y• ~ ~ ` ~ Jtr~ C, 1'~ r~ Mbp- t . K> -~nt1 ' L r soath Platb°U'Odary• a1ong ~ t on ~+iissioAVenue~, Looking w~ ~ r ~ ~ .V ~ . °Lx3 . -`a~°"~'''"~ ' .,a.~•., F r, .+.E ~~u~l;{-~ ~ ' ~ 4 . , w •XJ . ~ t 4,t~- ~ ~ •i t r.. Y~; .r i ~ ~t~ ~ a ' ~ - Court cul de sac- ERisting. Edgerton XW14AO00080Tp.dac . ' ~ , ~ ~ ~ • ' L ~ ~ ~ ~ w ; ~ ~ ~ ° ~ • • ~''t . +t.s, j, > • ~ l ♦ . ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ w I - ~ . Looking south on Center Road, toward Mission Avenue. Bradley Heights is on the right side of the photo. - ' • ~ ' : ~ ~ , ~ Northeast corner of intecsection of Mission Avenue and Center Road. Ki1bWH4000SPHOTO.doc ~ ~ r - ~ ~ `s~i" ~y,"''~ ;a~~4~~ • • "*i~ I . t~ t~ r ~ . ~af Edgertofl 'C°u~- . w~t side - DryvveU an ~ R J~~ Ak `s i sV t< 4 i ~r^-AAWr ~i ' ~ ona ~ r ' ~ - ~ ' !d~~~~,1~ • ` • ~ ~ANW, V ~ Cavrt. fo Edge~an ea~. slde 1 Drywell oa ~~OOOSjpHpTO.doc . Appendix D . Post-Developed Basin Map ~cn . , • Pi-ofessioncits. Otitstandijig Otialitl, DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, ~ ' i- - S P O K A N E 'v C U N T Y DNISION OF EIVGINEERING AND RQADS A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WOKKS DEPARTMENT William A. johns, P.E., Count~ Engineer October 14, 1999 Doug Busko, P.E. David Evans & Associates 110 West Cataldo Spokane, WA 99201 SUBJECT: ~11848 Bradley Heights Submittal Acceptance Gentlemen: We have conducted a general evaluation of your recent submittal for this project, and we find that this submittal appears to,meet the minimum standards of the Spokane Counry Standards for Road and Sewer Construction ("SCRS"). We are, therefore, able to accept your approval of the plans and calcuiations for this project. Io accordance with Section 5.02.1) of the SCRS, this acceptance is vatid uDNI October 14, 2002. If the facilities are not constructed by then, you may request an extension of the acceptance for an additional two years; however, the plans may need to be revised to reflect current staridards prior to granting the extension. Flease note: l. The County's acceptance of this submittal does not relieve the sponsor or his agents from any liability related to portions of the design that are not in conformance with the SCRS, or which do not follow good engineering practice; 2. All permits and notifications necessary prior to construction are the responsibility of the project Sponsor andlor his assigned agents; and 3. The Sponsor's Engineer is required to conduct inspection and testing work and submit Record . Drawings and inspection reports in accordance with the SCRS. We are unable to stamp the second set of mylars that was provided, as the Developer did not sign that set. That set is being returned under this cover. We will be able to stamp that set when the Developer has signed it. Sincerely, William A. Johns Spokane County Engineer I o, Ed P P.E. Plan Review Engineer encl. oc: Praject Sponsor Project File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. ~ Spokane, WA 99260-0170 ~(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 'tDD: (509) 324-3266 ~cn DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, EIv ED West u o Cataldo T R A N S M I T T A L RE~i To: Bill Hemmings, P.E. QCT 12 1999 spokane, Washingtcm 99201 Spokane County Engineers SPOKANE COUN7Y ENGfNEER Tei-- 509.327.8697 Faac: 509327•7345 DaTE: October 11, 1999 FROnn: Doug Busko, P.E. PROJECT: Bradley Heights, P-1848 PROJ. MAHA0005 z7CORIES:~' =A~TE;:.~ DE'S`CRIPrTION:'~~.-' . ~m~ . . . , . . . 1 2 9/20/99 Road Mylars ❑ AS YOU REQUESTED ~ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ~ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ DOCUMENT CONTROL ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ FOR YOUR REVIEW ❑ COMMENTS: B 111, Enclosed are two sets of road Mylars for this project. Please stamp both and return the one that hasn't been signed by the Sponsor yet. ~ ~ 0,,4fta~/.4y.,/ l h~ Thanks, Doug Busko, P.E. ' v! Oittstatiditig . . • • • \1spk1\voll\Sharelengrlmaha0005\transmittal to hemmines.doc 9 H,2mmings, Bill From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 1:42 PM To: Mark Storey PE (E-mail) Subject: P-1846 - Remington Hill - Basement Study Condition Here is the condition of approval regarding your study. A geotechnical report shall be completed that identifies those lots where basements can be properly constructed. Lots where basements and below grade level construction is prohibited shall also be identified in the geotec6nical report and suitable language shall be placed on the face of the plat identifying those lots where below grade construction is prohibited. No groundwater sump pumps or gravity drains may be connected to the sanitary sewer for any of the lots in this plat or be disc6arged to public or private road surfaces. All mitigating measures that may be recommended for lots approved for basements shall be a requirement of any building permits for said approved lots. Bill Hemmings, PE i DEC-22-2000 14:37 SIMPSON ENGINEERS 589 926 1323 P.01i03 ~ faurtQed 1944 6& i7npsan Engzn e eTS, Inc. N 908 Argonne Road Spakane WA 99212 Phone 926-1322 . Fax 926•1323 Tv: 01ui FrvAS: ~ t Y•G~ ~ (.L.c ~j Atteritiom Pages: (Indttding Covtr Shrc) ~ Fax t4'~ ~ - `t to SS ~ate: t 2 j22rOXD . . Ro: ~`'1t~r t•.~ot7~i~3 E~ ~ u.. ~o~~cTiO~",r - • Q Urgeat *cr Roview O Please Cominoat 13 Ptesse Reply Q Pq,r Yous Request , • Cacnrneetts: JIK f~; K - Ac►reb !f y4u rem.~ied this fax in Errot Oe2se ca(i 94255- 1 32Z and let us know. Thm1c yau, DEC-22-2000 14:30 509 926 1323 96% P.01 DEC-22-2000 14:37 SIMPSON ENGINEERS 509 926 1323 P.02i03 ~ 10. Erosion Control: A 1t,inporary Erosion and Sedimentation Conu-ol (TESC) plan shall be prepared by a WA Staie licensed Professional Engineer, and implemented throughout the duration of construction. The TESC ptan shall be prepared using best management practices (BMP's) currently accepted within ihe Civil Engineering profession, and shall address lirnits on amount and duration of disturbed areas which have not been stabitized. Tile TESC plan shall include, as a minimum, a grading plan, location and detaiis of silt control structures, and street cleaning program. 'Y'he plan shall provide for the filtering of nuxoff from exposed areas prior to discharging into a detention pond, 208' swale, or infiltration faciiity. The TESC plan shall be included in the road and drainage plans. The appiicant's Engineer shall submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County for zeview, and shall receive acceptauce as part af the plan review process prior to site disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as sili ponds, siIt traps) shall be installed prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of construction, ineluding house . construction. 11. The sponsar's Engineer shall properly consider arid include ali applicable mitigation measures that may be identified in the accepted geo-hazard repart for this project in the final design plans for this project. 12. If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access andlor drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to tbe submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the developrnent. One foot no access strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. Access through a non-certified and non•accepted phase of the development is not allowed, and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is cornpleted and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer. 13. A bond for the anticigated engirieering inspection and certif cation portion of the praject shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plar~ acceptance. . 14. The drainage system outside of the public right-of-way will neither be maintained nor ogerated by Spokane County foxces. Prior to plan acceptance by the County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County Engineer, for the petpetual maintenance of the stornnwater drainage systetn. This meehanism shall also provide for the fundin, of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the drainage systein at the end of the service life of the respecrive components, and any other unprovements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maurtenance Manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the proj ect documents subniitted to the County Engineer for aeceptance, along urith a discussion of the design Iife of the various components, a cajculated annual cost for repair and maintenaiice, and a ealculated replacement cost. A homeowners association lias been proposed by the applicant as the responsible maintenance entity. Homeowners associaLions are acccpted by the Spokane County Engrineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities• _ 1 ' e yY: • ~y~f7~y('M~+PMt•:.•l'+..riq..:i`.-MMe4~........,....-. .:i r} . .'t. _._...=`.M-.•. li.:. ' r ^ ~..tis:-~ ~''11:1i~'v.:Z.li- 1-.i..-~tY-1l: ~:4.e1~W~+"w'- :t•' - ~rr:a t. 15. A oeotectzniral report shall be completed that identifies those lots where basements ean be : , properl)• cofistructed. Lots where basements and below grade level construcrion is prohibited . shall also be ;dentified in the geoteclunical report and suitable Ianguage shall be placed on thc , ~face of the plat identifying those lots where below gradc consiruction is prohibited. No . t RE Findines. Cojiclusions and Decision PE-1846-97/ZE-52•97/PUDE-b-97 Psge 29 98% P DEC-22-2000 24:31 509 926 1323 P. 02 S I MPSON EP1G I NEERS 509 926 1323 P• e3/es DEC-22-2000 14:36 ~ grvundwaier sump pumpb gravity drains may be connected to tlie sanitary sewer for any vf the : ;lots in this plat or be discharged to public or private road surfaces. AlI mitigating rneasures that niay be recommended for lots approved for baseznznts shall be a requirernent of any building permits for said apprvved iots. ~.'Ywid1la~.C~~ah{.:lri`:i1ti~•IMlLYiW+i~l'AIAi.7~Q1NlL~~►4:.~d::...• . • ;v.•l:v. ' ♦ 1iitntAra'!-~•^'a••"•••'••~ ' :'ww~,Ya::'t.,..•t•.'',w. i:.~ur_ti._r« ;•_.._',:~'y"a~d~.'.OA~~%+a's'1 16. If the geotechiiical report for this project reconvmencis groundwater drains, thcse drains shalt bc constructed in accordanCe with plans that have been reviewed and accepted by the Spokane Cotuity Engineer. 17. 8ased upon traffic information submitted by the applieant and from previously approved conditions for Morningside Heights PUD by the Board of County Commissioners, $500.00 per lot will be coliected frorrt the !ot owner at the time of a building permit. The $500.00 shall be used for road irnprovements for Saltese Road and signalization improvements for CRP #2734 on Suilivan Road. 18. Constructivn within the proposed pubtic streets and easements shali be perfornned under the direct supervision of a licensed engineerisurveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that aIl improvements were installed to the lines and grades shvwn on the approved construction plans and that alt disturbed monuments have been rcplaced. 19. No construction work is to be perfozmed within the existing or proposed Fublie right-of- way until a permit has been issued by the Caunty Engineer. All wark is subject to inspection and approval by the Counry Engineer. 20. All construction within the exisiing or prvposed Public right-of-way shaR be compZeted prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Enginecr to cover the cost of construction of improvements. Construetion certification, "As Built" plans and manumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 21. '£he applicant is advised that individual driveway access pernuts are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. 22.... A staiement shall be piaced in plat dedication that no direct access is allowed from lots to 32id Avenue. 23. Road and drainage pians for Man O' War Court were prepared in conjunction with the original plat of Remington Hiil (File No. PE-1763). Surety for Man 0' VVar Court was accepteti by thc County Engineer in lieu of eonstruction ai the tirae of filing of a final plat for Building and Pkan.ning File No. PE-I 763. The surety for Man O' War Court shall not be released uniii such time that Man O' NN'ar Court is established as a public road. 24. The County En;ineer has designated a 3 Lane Minor Artcrial Roadway Section for the improvement o#' 3?" Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed devclopment. This will require the addition uf vart-•ing amounts of asphalt along the frontage of the dcvelopment. The consiruction ot ctubin~ and sidewalk is also required. ?S. The private roads shall be impraved Eo adopted Spokaile Couniy Road and Sewer Standards foc ptivate roads. HL Eindiiigs. Canclusions and Decisioli PL•-I846•9iiZE-52•97/PUDE-6-97 Page 30 T07AL P.03 96% P.03 DEC-;~2-2000 14:31 509 926 1323 0£u 1- r -o P~ 1. ~ c~ O so" . ~ tt JA~K 4 ~ , a ' G ,~o~` 5,✓ "~~~v~ K~ INr~R .A-T-1°' a ~s `v ap , - • ' : a ~ JE pJE , g GL ~ p~ ~ Q a 8 GK ~ ~ ~ANOtrJQ,~7R~. ~ . tAaNtoO 4 V ~ P • Tp Ma P ~ q F2Lj5~,~ AC ~ t- ~ Y OL m N ~ 1 ~ 710 ~.:.1 1 W A ~Ca~vO~ ~PQ ~ iGA p00` I+~ p N G E 1~,1N~` 1 It ~ q ~ ~ • 6P''~' ~ PA . `g~ .PROF11.E c~FIC s M\ 2Q ~ - r , ol~-'~ r- . ~ . . .l~ ~ . . Pvl~' -`t~' ~ I • . ,<•c~ ~ ' g - 'r• ' n $c ~ ~ Z o ~ . • , , ~ ' • ~ . `J 1 Q - ~°L . ~-y ' ~ ~ 1 l1 2QJ • • f i ~ tl tr' , U { \ ♦ C` 1 J ~ / /f 1 f • ~ . e`~ ~ • I ~ ~ . 1 ~ . ~ ; . y u 3 - ~ ~ . ii ~(~EP! . ~ ~G . • y~ ~ At11GM Qp~tR 301NS i•._~.e y'~~~..~ "a5 . : 1~ ~ ~~o.r- ~ ~ r ~ ~r, n ai ~a - , - - I 4%3124.2001 33124.1901 4S073A3Q2 .5073.0232 43 3.0811 ~430 0M 33124J9Q7 45D'T3D~ l - '3073 0231 .031 45 A M ~ 90q S ' 1998RE 3 44 !9(~i 35►241 ~ ~ 3 4507 ,3 #iaa.aw: a. o oQ ~ .07 s ~li2a ~ 1 124.2so ~ A269 i s i~a i2a.~ea; dsor3msi ~ Aa~s 4; 7!6 8 ~ 6073A401 .O271~m 0270 3 r124IM2 ~ ~1,f124.1701 X 410 i3 'A'~6 4,Ta 2A6 1,& 8Ab ]9 t .0503 .06 ~l 430'3~ 45Q~3.061 TA FiQSA PARIC 6LK 4 DXCVJ158FT 5124.180Q 351241401 2504' - 820] 3 15 _ 'Q► 131.OQ0~ 3 182.041 ~ ~ 4 !82 11 :2~ Rm 182 ~ ~ , 31A1 182.041.' 5182.0303 1 l i 13107l1: 3 1 187. 1 182.U307 ° 182A42~ ~ 4 M94.9'B!? 31 19 1 182.041 2v 9 83 1.ODIi ~4 ~ 18 Aa18 1 7 ' ~ ~,'m~.~, , 131A1 l ~ ~l l iffi.0219 ~i ~35~3~ 45 31 33131 11 1 131 1 ~ ~ 1 1~ Q 82 , 131A5 7 !131'13 31A1 1 1 ~ 131A11.011 I ~ / v 45C6.02~5 9 45(173.02~5 St)7 .0709 ; 45C~73.02b8 45Q73.02 4 ' 45073.02$~50 45 W.02~6 ,998 i aE 45073.0261 5073.0268 ~5073.0269 ~ ~r5073.0262 4SC.7 072 ~ ~4~M.0263 45073.0270 ! o ; -15073.0401 5073.0271 , te , ' el'S073.0502 073. 4 I SAfVTA RUSA PARK BlK 1 EXC 4JI5BFT i ~ i } 45073.0503 0"73, 0615 I ,f5073.0504 i y :k JS 45T$2.04 7 45192.03 6 ~`182.041 45182.04~29 4~182.042 _ , . w . ~N. t'~ • ; i T C 7' •r. '~rj ~''i'. ~ ~1L r,q~~~~~a _ T < 1 ii,~ • ` ~ ~es. bF . . S~ g~.~,yR• 1 .40C ~ I + - 1 2 ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~i< i• . x ' %1 { V ~ " c'•'? a ' ;p r : 1 "J x. r a~ . w " 1! ~)1 ~ ~1~ 9 ie.~.~~•.-~ ~ ~Y' as ~ 1 2j6 "~J t ti ..1V "i S j ~ t2 ~ ~vz . ~ ~ V 9 , ~ ~~a , Sv. !t LAA ♦D i t R t 4, ( 0 n ~ , O~ ~~;db~y,y . •.+a 4 ~ n'~ ~ ~ g 8 ~w2 1A3 7 ~ • =~?~{yr~ , ' i ~ ~ « a 'i1. 4•,' ~y~tw .o. ..F nrZ~w 253 ~ ~ : _•__.r N„pn a~ ~ S~+ r ~ J+ 2S2 v-O ' ~n • ~ .a ~t~rti~rnr~' r ~ . ZS'9 - M~~~ a L b ` 4S6 ° ~ ~ n ' . t TRACt ~ y . ~ ~ 25~ 26~ ^ Q . . o .r~/.'~ r 0 f O ' ~6` ~ Zb f 80 lI h cr 'L Z'-~ •fB2 ~ 1R~ t~ D oe. ~ i ~ N • - !R r ta6 . - e~r ~l 4'ifAM4r1Y V'~. l '1,a x z ° 200 ~o'o ~3 1,~i g~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ztl - ~ ~ r r ~EI ~2~ 2~i 'cr.c4. 4~ ~ ' , ~n•~~~~~~ ' - w x 1~~, . ' • ' , ZJF ~~"'A , jf7 i ~ • - ~ r t~ + ~ s 3^" \7~A ~o s?.►e . Y r~' t~~ Y ¢Q t ~ , , . . ~ 3 i;= . • ~ . • y'. . ~ 1 tD J ` * ` , ~ + '"D'. ~ :i ,K • ~ ' - ~ s''~ ~ t ~ ~ a . ' ~ ~ , r, , " ,q: s:,:i Al~~ ~ I "i ' ~ ' ~r ~ n , " ~ „ ~ , t+ ~ ~ t `I• .►y E i ~ ,4 •s ~ ~ 1 ' = ~ +ft~ n • ' ~ S s T ~ , + ' ~ ~ !p ~ ~ . ^ ~ ' 4 ~ _ . M~ Y ' ~ i • ~ Q; ~ ~w ~ y J+-A, ~~,,.I•• ~~3 ~ _ ° S'i ~ _ ~ r .4 ~ ~ . a ~ p y V_, 7 ~t, w I~ .i~ J r,qx fi J 7 r • Q ~ 4 -o~. O z j ~ t9 ~ fN+' • ~ - I. '1 ~'e ' . ~2~~ ~ e ~ r + • F~.' ~ '~1 .~~i.+' \Q, ' p ~ ~ _ , . ~►L 'c'Y . , F ;~~~'~R, i ~3 ` ;ow PppRTUN1'fY ~I ~ r l : y , ' t , ~ A ~ ~ • ' .t . r ~ • Y X Q sT t t ~ ^ (P0~ tt ey ~ ::7j ~ .~a • ♦ ~ . ~i1 oa. y ! ~ 7 r~ ~ i ~ q . ~ J ♦ . r.65 ~ [_y~~'t'jD` r ~ ♦ 4 ~ r~uy- ~+tSt:r+~`'~~ ~ fSr1~,:M+f~".!''.fr• ~~.~h~'?•J~ . . ~ ~ J/' ~~w~a~`-~"~L'}~ ~~1~ ' ~,,[]/•,f.~~'~r. ~ f • n+~~r~~~~.~./q..!' ~.~..r~/ ~ ~ 3~ • i.r✓~ ~ J3+!~°~''~ 1✓J ~~/1"r~!FIt~"'/w~ „n= 3 ~ ~ ~ ~r !N + ' ~~KPTtOwr L ~ ps~,,;; ~ .9 . ` p~..~• ' ~.Uiet~i~.sf'~.~yt.i•~v w"„'.an . ~ i . V . ♦ PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 VICINITY M-AP . +r~ . • f • ~ . T 5• S .r: :•s :•1• ' F . ~ b . . 8ER J D w o : ~ '.'J'~'~ •:I.:•.1':: :.\:':.':l.'.":: • ~ . - . . . . J ~ ~ : :ti;:~:~:r' : : Z Q ~ ~ Q' . kiEVf U R - ~ ~ C J . :~1 ~ R f'.;':: : : ~ : ~ G• ~ ~ y . f t• . : f : : ~ : : : : ~ 1 C • ~ C . S TTA R1EE ~ O K OtJ . ~ . AC 1: W U P A F- z Ib'1..E R w ~ ~ - -1 , . 41ELD ~ : : ~ . : . . . . . ~ . . ; . < : : ~ : : :N OX LX v 2 o N Q 7R~ cr INO ANA r w ~ 290 ' W ~ ~ W W , I A :•~•I~ I.•: . ~ ~ ~ ~ y, A N T 0 • ~ , ~ f ~ SRELP • ~ E 6 ]ESM~' p S1.1 z Y p .A~A~ < rATA~,IT ATA . w 11 ~ a • ~ i.i 3. Q A 4 0 ~ IE~ ~ m ~M ~ _RSTA TE o 'GROUNDS ALXI N vE INOlANS vai I cYN_ v E ' z LL STADIUM NA ~ SQ Q , 8MAIN = . AI r= I ~R E i ~ ~ ~ , ► . ~ ~ m 11ST a ~ ~ 3~ ~ Q . ~ dTM I ~TM-- N . ILT- o I ~ OrSNtiraN • ~ 24 ~ HlLLS . = I I I7TN ~ CAMP ~ -2r3- , 0 g xaRO. ~ i rn , : I I I na ~ : ~ Not to scale • ~ - cn Q - M ~ ~ RE\A5ED T pF: ~ PAEUMINARY P~'I J:.. S , ~ n Q G ~ ~ ~r W.M• PRO•fE ~ ~ T, 25 N„ R• Loc~TroN , ~ 14 OF SEC. 7, R A ~R . Y . -t1oN pF -ME SW.UJN?'( WASHINGTON Q W 00 . BE1NG A p SPOKANE 1► " ~,s~4~ ^ ~ P P4~ ~ ~ ~Y~ & auGi%stA a`~• `~'j s 4~~ r +~+s:''''" ~ ~ °`w~`•'r-. ...,a~r- °""~""a~ ~ ' lao Q 50 Q y0 z . 0 L ~ 17- -a, 1 J c ~-~i o ~ p,,,~~,~ 1= ~ ~,~a r' I ~ o R05A ~a M~ Y ~ p 5 ~~'~4~ r~ 1 w C P1` _ P ~i T CI' p wY r~ ~n ~~y~CfO~ r K6m W_ L 0 ~ .,~9+~' n i. ~w il.' ~~d'• fU0 • w~ n, r ~ pit4+ Q r~ 'j ( ~Sp •.R , ti~ a b ~O~ ~ ~•r'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ""R ~on .~o O~~ wID o~ . ~ ,Q ~ ~ ~ ~ , . L ~ytV ,SBi" ~ f"e ~ i r M~~wrr ux ~ . ~ g y 1s.. „.ir ~ c' 4 I „w o ;~•-i "'-,r-""'' II e ~4 ` 4~ 10 $I 9 ~Iw•~i..'~~ „ ~ w ' ~ 14 13 ~w -J t~ ~ ~,yf •t~ ~ ~~'a $ ~"u=~J ~ ~aZt ~•-'~}L" .r--4 ~ J 't ~ ~ " S ^ ~ rr•r i' 1A I ~ y.1il~ ' ' ~ . r ~ f • ~ i}( ''I~X 14 uA11~ : y~ ` f! ° ! ~ . ~ • ~ qtw 1Dfk ~ 1 ~nc~ uR r ut55ACN A~' I r d xvp ~"ie ~y K W w~ rt . ~ W a /~r • ~I iW pry I ~~VGNED µyip ~ W W~~X SFOKANE COUI~ ` ' sco r4 1441 ~~~,~t !i ~~ld wT •+wm L~ j -,,,,~p •t fco7U%°"' rua[rr'ta ` ~tnsro~r ja~ ~a oo°"e y~ a~ ~ Ot`115iQ14 cf ~ " ~ ' gy' .xx ,z ~ p~ RECORD ~ i > ~ 3 s • l • ~ . ~ _ PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 VICINITY A P < • . .~~t' : - ~ 4 . . : ~ ~ ' ~ ' r•: . ' S ~ . : : ~ S i::::: :;=:'.=i;:•. : `Q . :-f. . . ~t~~ BER 4 J _ 0 J . - . . . . J I - CK z ~ \ 5 R ~.r~. '-L:::~ : : . : : : • 4 Y : ♦ w :ti~ 'v'•:: . J . K l~ R a ~ YE C a• C U .i".'•~ ' : ~ . : T A : R1EET ~ ~ ~ pt.{ . . O AC4C i. U .1.:•'~;:'.:. z g - 'tE I R~ W J : Z U W = ~ : :•.'a.•: . ; ~ : - c _~IELD Q r~::: ~ NOX TREN ~ WD A N W ~ 290 u' w L) C3 w Q ~ A ►.1T . ' ~ E ~ ~O D SME , T Y o )ESM~' ~p Y. tAi a X 1 74 ~f Q FRSr,a rF N I EDI 'GROUNDS ALKI ~ ~ z VE INDIA N S v--LE6Y6Y HA s LL STADIUM ~ ~ IN 9dAU , I R 1, sr g ~ N ~ t tn Q . 0 3R N ana ~ TM DlSHhtAN • ° 24 TH`- Nt«S . ~ CAMP • l ~7TN KARO ~ ► ~ ti ~ T Not to scale . , . . . . REViSED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: ~ F I IE ~I I'S ~ ~ r I BRA") I Y BEING A PORTION OF THE SW.1/4 OF SEC. 7, T. 25 N., R. 44 E, W.M. SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ cocaT►oN z ~o Ba R~ ~Q~ 2 pG }1 _ W ViC?Jfi'Y MAP ?Ka ° 4 ~~i ~ . ' b u auCUSiA AvF. 1 f 7N ~ Si4S~ ~.•y..- I I 1 nen ~r f+~arT.J I~ I i lxZ~x ~ l 3 ~ . _J = ,~,•.~r „ ' ~ w,~ • n,A aa" C c ~asm .ti r a : ,J L Q _ L_.....:_J n`-===- - - r I so o sa 160 o i r----, o~ b ~ ~-^s C ~ a0 t .+or i W'b°" 15 „ 1~ ..:c:n Ilt' aWLU~~OM1 I= 1="s~_J I ~ Pp4~ q~ 4 061.;~ L. ~ ~ F..~•.. ~ q o S~,~tS~' ~~4C+• z~ a I ,0 r_ ~~e 8~ 1 ~ 6 ~ { r b. ~ i5 `3 .ta» ea xiir .n 1 I yz2 W L i t+:al nCCP2r1 CN . ~a Ar I .M1 Q{~~~(~~ - - - - - _ _ J p ~,~j mrcr ti s.rA rot. rMa. n eJ~~ • - - - - °fi''' ~y,~ ,a.~ ' :E 6 Z °IY+~S`~' v -urs ~•a n • va.c m,m. .,a.cior L i ,;t Iu' ° b~~ U ~e, oam x ar ia iar aocv: .a c+-r ncr rana oc= G--~ r--~ r--i r"-t r- I I 10 MMi-tt Uv 9btrt 00* C0Cm 0014 r0l ,'I= L I I I I l I ~ ~ I( e$ I I 8~I " u, a ~w ~aoi ammw alraa ~ a € i` y I 13 I i2 } I I io ~ L ~prc nf I cr,At nocrafp~! ua wR ~.~n_aJ s un ,.ti J l. J l.._ l.. -_t L- ~r I b a ourt oxn~cr u^^F ~ vow r pm~ wm MA u w I 3e s v.r . snr* .ao.eno. .iu _ • I A ~a ec aoc.w - - - " ~ A ~ A115$ION AVE. _ ~ . a at nATA I W ~ Mi4 Wm 1 Wil f+ri > Z Q ~1 ^'^ihC 11~ 1 ~ p W ~ • qcsm u1l a ~ Wo-vOcg%C AJR WM ~ S V u7P SGyT V0-14 ORMtr -T OfmK'? +G 7 iIMM '.Ry2 90lw[ 00.Mn 4 V w wc 43.% R 00.1 R ~ ~ . RECEIVED , „r;,~ ; R P*C,r„nXF I R ,_S7d. y0( ' s qFVln/1puFNTSiAT%UFNi AaoO!c,P4N, SFOKANECOUNTY uR.,w oe vw~ %+r e o. r.an= awoIa' +~ww r+ia.o ~awn -rron or ro acm ss rt. ntx . cau+ec 17 ua ~a +cmaid+ at nc u3 Y 1u m r ~efimm :-~~d~.,.., ScD r 9 1497 cRF .IA~ i r-IHtAj cy,aacYrw'c rta~a~ats ~ 1~ owscnr eo~pn -ur .oc n a 0lVISiOV C'f BUILOl~ Wccb, . CD-., •.M nc ~cn,.roo~a o nc cr Ib u~+m 4 sart mwn nnmc .t «ia 2Y. ~'•t~+,f' . att~11111 i ~ 4mG ~ eCi wasm,,'¢ OF RECORD r , ~ ~ _D GER-~pN cOUR~ , I 00~3~ ~N N~5 8 65 E~EN1 p~p rU~ , 2 R~ER EA~ ~~tDE _ , ON-~ ~ ARD ~ 34. 47 ~ F R g Q SET ~J ~I SAC Sg° 4BK4° - ~ ~ ~ Ln ~ o, ~ i o c~ <C ~ . - ~ a O c9 Q. 2cy" cn ~ ~ 45'19„ E AR A~p N ~E-~g p,CK , SIDE ~PRp 5 SEIg ACK , Af ERu!NE ~W ~ EMENT - W. $ ~ ~ _ Lo~ - S • 5 • t ,d 307 IONAA, , NpRTH ? 30,_ ° EXPR~s. ~K ~ - LQT A P - - NT P\ RoSA GNT ~ - s HEI ~,o AoLE L ~ ~ 1 ; 70, - ~ _ 50.0' R/W C/= CUL-DE-SAC 43.0' 1, 2:0', 5' WALK 20' BORDER EASEMENT ~ p~ - CONCRETE SIOEWAIK 3 ~ O 3 i A W A a p SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B'CURB ~ REfER TO SPOKANE COUNTY Q STANDARD PIAN A-3 ~ ~ 0 o ' 0 d S C ~ / ~ O m 3 ca (cu ; rj' " • r y ' . ' , ru ` ..2 2 ~ r _ . . , . . : ~ ~A, . l. ~%~i , . . y~ ~i:I a'~~+ + ° i ~ • . . . . .w , ''G 01% : '~EDfGTON COURT::fl:RA~l *CROSS SECTION WITHOUT DRYWELL ~ UI 1.,`'~ . . . _ : t ` ~ ~ S •,~1'v. ~ ; . . ~ ~ (H A~LFi~~CUk,- SAC SECTI ON ) o . . , ; . .-•,i :a~:~ ~~yti ~ ~ ' . . . _ _ . • . . . , . . . ^ , ~ ~ S 0 r. . . ~ ' . . • ' . " 3 Q•v - ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ a EDGERTON COURT ~ `~~DRAINAGE SECTION ~op 34a75 SAN TA ROSA P-A.RK,: ~~,~CISTERF'~1~ f~~. N`ORTH Slo~tT ''~~~r« ~ lVAL ~ E~ ~ ~ -~BRA~DL~EY'y l~ErGHTS~~ NO SCALE ¢ ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ . m: - .20 1 BORDER EASEMENT 5~ S~pE YARD SE T B AC O FRONT YARD ~ ` - cy'- SETB ACK 48.18' UJ cr-, ~ `4g' 40 ~ ,88 ~ 0 Q ~ °o a ~ I~J o uo o . cn 50' ? . 20 ~J 13~-.47 1 Sgg° 48' 4~ \N 15, REAR Y p,RD , SIDE Y ARD SETB AcK 5 SETBACK ,37»\N ~55~~5 28.65' ~ ~ . . . ~ ~a~.. . ~ . . , . .'.ft~, : ,f 'y~~'• , • • . ' ' i " •`~',:v'= ~ •i A W. ~ I U~ { • e~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~'t ♦ • . i t ~ . . ~ ; . ~ ! O L ~t) ~wA '1N ` ,,`',,ti f` w Y.F~,..' , • • ~ t, ~ ~ ~Ra O V~ ~~hY; te ~ :S a ^ _ • . 4 ~ 1 ,r'. • ' . h• ' i ~ • . • ~ i Y ~E,4. ~ ;~I _ . . ~ F , , • ` ~ ~ 34875 c-y , , , ~ ' _ • y~ r~~,~, ~'GIST~~v ~ti - , • • ,yt r, ~ ss r,~, . ; - . ~ . . . ~N ;~R T H roNAL SCALE.y'~' 30 ES~ ~C~• 9. zooo ~ 2 BLOCK : . . ~;Y - ~ EXPIR p ARK. NTA Ras.A , . . ~ s A . . GH~ S p~EY "f-:1 BRA ~ x , ~ , 70, ~ _ 50.0' R/W ~ C/L CUL-OE-SAC 43.0' 12.0', 5' WALK 20' BORDER EASEMENT ~ . . ~ - CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3 ~ O 3 i A W A ~ Q O SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B'CURB ~ REFER TO SPOKANE COUNTY ¢ STANDARD PLAN A-3 / v 0 0 0 d S d E ~ ~ O P~ • 3 A N M • ' . • • • . . . _ ,1. . . . , r . r . • V • ~ , • ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . -EDGE-RTON COURT°. DRAI'NAGE CROSS SECTION WITHOUT DRYWELL Ln . ~ . (HA, F. ~CU~ -~DE-SAC SECTION) ~ W. o A ~ EDGERTON COURT . DRAINAGE SECTION SAN TA. .ROSA- PARK N 0 RTH jST o _ • . ~ _ , ' SJ~NAL Q 6RADLEY "HEIGHTS'r- NO SCALE _ ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ Q ~ k STA. 3+54.45 SWALE BOTTOM ~ BEGIN SWALE AND AREA=307 S.F. 0 SPOKANE COUNTY BOT. EL.=1955.02 I CURB INLET TYPE 2(4' WIDE) ry ~ I.E.=1955.60 (AT C/L INLET) W ry C~ D r-) 0 20' BORDER EASEMENT ~ 5' SIDE YARD W U SETBACK r N g8°48' 40"E 170. 43' ~ - ~ w N 30, I s ~ -0O 3 0QO o(-o Ow Q, \ 0 -J ~ , - 25,~ S88°48' 40" W 148.18' ~ 0 ~ ~-FRONT YARD 15' REAR YARD SETBACK SETBACK STA. 3+83.20 5' SIDE YARD END SWALE SETBACK STA. 3+68.82 SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE B DRYWELL LID EL.=1955.52 ST A. ±b9.14,. `/n~,:~.~~l~.L SAC C . ~ _.,~:t~.t'y'~•'P~; _ { '~/~/:.i;f„, ii,^.,'~.\~.~•. - ~ ~ - , :L"OT.*,:PLAN wAS r y~'.;,'~' . - • , . . ~s;'~`c ~t ~ . - 09, . . . . , • . ~I I V'OI \QIu f I ~ 34@75 c1 W '~CIST . . ~ StALE: 1 " - 30'_ 0" SANTA ROSA PARK IONAL B R A D L E Y H E I G H T S IEXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ i ~ ~ C/L ROAD ` t 45.0' T ~ I 25.0' R/W ~ I ~ 18.33' I 2t0-i5' WALK 7 00 20.0' 80ROER EASEMENT T j ~ SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB ~ ~ I . ~ . I I I 0) ~ CONCRETE SIDEWALK BEYOND j ~ • 12.0'! 9.0' 1 SWALE BOTTOM ~ I A I ! ~ I ~ ~ . W i 2.0% - 4.5%~ ~ GRATE EL. ~ 2 I A { I ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ai SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 2 v 0 0 0 d S ~ / d O ~ 3 A O ' ~ ' , : . ~ . . . , . . . ~ r ~ t~ ~ ~j•''i' i;,,- . . ; . - M t~~ .i%3t~/~q;~.'0e ~ ' • , • M Q~; ~ ~ • t ' ~ ' ~ .f:: .•%l 7 ,r ` ~ rsy.~ . t1 3 . ~ . ' - . • „ ~ . •i : ~ ;'S f ' ~ h•.,p i ~ . f.' • A ~ M . T ' _ ON ~ ~ • ..~=_:R r:. . ;Y~y • 't ° 'j ~ ~ . \ 7 -E-DGERTON COUR;-T.;pR`;A.;N.~4;~E CROSS SECTION WITH DRYWELL tn ~ i . _ _ . . . _ . . . ; ~ . , . ~ . . . ; ~ . , . j q' ~ i^~ i - ~ . • „ ' ' ~ 'r } i • } e } 1. ~ ~.t . _ . , . •y. -j,•,f • l~~: .p, tl••,-, L ~ yX O~ 3 E'•~~ , ~ . ~ I~ A p.j EDGERTON DR-AINAGE SEQTION N ORTH 34e-M SCALE S .R .0 S.A~ RA~R-K T6AN T~_" RADLEY~HE~I^G`~iT ~ ~ . . . _ : `r SI~~AL Q , ` ~ ,♦4 a _ ~ Q EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ F ~ ~ -r A 25' FR~N AUGOS - R~ AGK I VE • E~g ACK, ~ETB ~ A S , ~ ~pE ~ AR~ „ 155 ~ 5 o ~814o E _ ~ETg `.188 ~ . . 1~ 4 I o ~ I ~ co .o - o 5.03 o4g~ 40 E , gpRDER , tl~ ~ N88 10 ~EN-~ I~J , E~ p,RD E p,SE ~ C.~ 5 S~p ~ SE18 A~K i ~ , .k 4' • ~ ' , r{ J . R - ' 1~'y • ; , • • . ' , , . ' ~ _s~ ~ ~ ~f~• a ~1~ ~ ~C1 . [ l~ • ; . . . •.r . . ~ P L p,N ~ - l ~ • t, . ~ . . . ' . IL.~ 5 i~ . , • ; . • , . + ~ r t • . . • . [yr ♦ , 4..+ ~ . ,r • ` ' , ~ • • • ~ • t , • , • i, ~ /r ~ 3481,5 ~'sS10NAL y=~ti• . . . ' . . . • ' •.~F1 OR 1 ~ ~1 ~ f ^t~ -_7000 A • . , . A~~ : ~ ~XP~R~ pC B`--Q cY\. - N~ p, R GH't'S S ~ NEI ~ARn►.E C/L ROAD I 10' SORDER ~ I j EASEMENT ~ { 30- R/W ` ' I I I~ ' ' 18' 2.o j ~ SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' i URB I 1 ~ ~ 2.0% - 4. 5% I . ►I ~ ~ .c-~,- . - • • - • ~ - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , ~ a ~ - ~ • • - j••. .~~~f ~.i~ ~if• . ` ' ' j" ~i~, ~r• ; ' .i: 'i s e.' ~ + , 1'~a ~~j ~ e ~ ~ ~ r ! • . ' • !w- y • T} .F'~'O ~ ~ j '1i r~~~ rjrr~' ? r~°~ :j wa e _ • , • . ; r • ~ r~ . 3~ . i..v ~2 ~ y i~ . • < Vv x ~`1 . . . . • t'' ~ -.-j.~ i i ' 1 ' `~ROSS-- SECTI ON _ . . . . CEN`TE~-~s~.'Q~?~~~~ _ _ . . . . . ..t.. ~ _~~~L,; ~ ~ _ . _ ~ . . • . . . . . ~ . , a WA .,I.IK' ~'+~i • • ~ V , ,A,~ . , • .i . ~ ~ .:r` , ~r?;~; 3 CEN.:T,ER RQ"-AD . ~ _ . ~ • ~ ~ ~\i ' '•'~"y~~i' - + ~ ~ fTH `.I4875 ~ CROSS-SEGT~ION- _ NO §CALE ~{"(/=~f.~,,.~: f f sl p ~ I\r A S ~ ,.P •t_•"S A 1 Y• T.*.,.~ ~ r . ~A' ~ . . . ! r ~ ~.-r 7 ~ 7'~~ T .j ONAL .a.. - . 2 '~._.~l~J' . .*e. .i'.. ~ 6RADLEY HEfGHTS EXPIRES: OCT• 9, 2000 M • • I a r AUGUSTA ~ AVE. . 15' REAR YARD SETBACK ~ - 5' SIDE YARD 25' FRONT YARD 0 ~ SETBACK SETBACK < W O ~ N88°48'40"E 155.03' .o ° ~ o - ~ cfl W o Qo ` O "1,** o W ~ w o~1- o o ~°o 0 ° i o ~ ' I cn N88°48'40"E 155.03' ~ -5' SIDE YARD 10' BORDER SETBACK EASEMENT I ' ' ..G•_ ~ ~ - - I 14. ' ♦ . . ' - • ' ~ . . • • - . i.~. , , j~ ' . . . ~ ^ . ` : • Y'• • ~ . _ . . , j~~~z. , T.PLAN _ . . . , : ~ : ~ti~s W 8 fh, • ' ' • ' ' , , ` } r . , ' ~ ! t ; . . - ` ! • . ; ; . . i : ' - ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ - . . . . n . . 34e75 s 4 ~v . t . . , . OR TH TE¢.c, L,OT 5 _ gLOCK 1 30'-0„ `SSI0IVAL ~~G SAN.T-A. ROSA P ARK~~ : : . . . < . . . . _ . r.. B R A D L E Y H E I G H T S~ r EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ . ~ ~ . ;43 i.; ir „ ~ ~p' gOROER i EASEMENT C/L ROAO ' - 30' R CURB ~ . ~ ' . SP pKAN ' E C~~~TY ~~E I ~ ~ 1r . - w r ~ 2.0% .5% ~ - 4 ~ ~ ~ ` ~Y J_p~ . . . • ~ • ~ ~ . a ~ •t -SEC TION a . Ap CROSS ~ w. ,TE~-~R,. A :'GC~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ .t , . . _ . ' . , ' , . ~ ,b , . , .~a r.' ' • , 3 34875 ~TH o rs~r~¢,~c,~~ ~ R C~ ~`a Q No p,LE IONAL ~ ;~~NTE . ION ~ ; . S~ ~ ~ y' • ~ ('1 S~►-J. C''J' t~ C ~ Y~ j , . . . . . ~ ~ ~ i EXPIRES: OCj • 204~ C~ ROS p~ T A ;P A~ : S I~N HE j~HT S ~ ApL~Y~ - . 7 . - ~ BR~.... . . ..:::.w:. . . I _ y ~ ~ 15' REAR YARD SETBACK - 5' SIDE YARD 25' FRORIT YARD SETBACK SETBACK ~ ~ N 88°48' 40"E 155.03 < ~ w U ~ ry d- w ~ ~ w ~ O 0 O W O ~a o 1 10 0 0 o W V) U N8804519"E 155.04' 5' SIDE YARD 10' BORDER ~ SETBACK EASEMENT s- ~-z ~.-,..Y„~,.w .,..y~ . . . . . . . . . . . ,r;•1. . c . . . . ` " ; ~ Z !`I` y ~!:';:~~~'R• • _ • , s . . ? _...`.k~t~.%~i'•`.. . ' . . . : • . . . ' ;i-~ -.;~d• • ~ • `1~ `~~y ~7 t - V,~ •E , `~ti , y ~ ~n•: • .t ~ ~r.~ ~1 ~ ~ r ; ,N~ ~ i t. . . ~ . . ~ ~ c s ~ ` ~ •TV" `~t4s~~ .i. l'Y ~o:r . ~ • t s'. 1 . -..sC t4w~ , ....~_~w, ' ` Q j•. j`~y, . . ' '..T~. . ; ~ ...t,..w, ; ~~:f ~ _ . - . . ~ pLAN • . , . . ~ , • F-:• f, . ' . _ _ • . . • • ~ , ' ;'~c4~ ' ' " r . . • . . ~ • ~ ~ ' • ' ' . ' ` F ~ ~ 1~Y NS wAS N4 ~ , . . ~ • j . . f ~ ~ . ' ~ . Sj<~ t ~O O~" , ~e; u ° 1 ~ • ' . r . . ~ ' • ' . . . : . , . . ~ ' Y . - . . • ',i`{r ~ . - . . . • " . . . ~ O _ . , . ~ • . , . . . • z LbT 6 B . . , . L Q,CK : 1 N,0 R TH 34e76 ~ w SAN_ TA~.::...R_O.5:A~_ -scACE: 1" - 30'-0„ GIST ~~f'~~ RK ss ~ ~ E~ BRADLEY HEIGHTS I~NAL ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ T ~ r ~ ~ ~S . ~ I`. ~ y C/L ROAD ' I ( 10' BORDER I ~ I 30' R/W j EASEMENT ~ - T 18' 12.0' I I - -r ~ ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB ~ ~ l I I 2.0% - 4.5% I ~ I I Kv ; . ~ ✓ ..y.'~yl. ~ . . . . . - . , /i . . . I ~ ~ . . • . ' • . . y • .~t`} :i r~ :3 x ! ' Y, . . . ~ 9 . ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ' ~ ~ . ✓4 s~,d~~. 41~ 1.! f~' i ~ : 'r . . . . . ~i • ~ , ~,F _ ~ CEN-TER.-:=OAD ~ "CROSS- SECTI ON ' ~ . ...Y , ; . _ , • ; f ~ wa , ,-CEN.TER ROAD N 4R TH CROSS-SECTION . ~ . ~ . ~ o ~e,5 o w ~SANTA ROSA PARK ~ . No scALE SCIST ~ BR-AD"LEY HEI-GHTS~~~ ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ ' 10' BQRDER EASEMENT 15' REAR YARD I SETBACK - ~ YN88-45'19"E 82.21' o o Ln Q N o 0 . ~ ry w 5' SIDE YARD ~ SETBACK ~ w ry o d- ° ~ W ~ ~ r- ~ O ~o 12' BORDER ~ `t o Z- CIO EASEMEN T -j , o W ~ 2 5 0 5' FUTURE o U' ~ ACQU I SI TI ON ~ I FRON T YARD SETBACKS , - o - , ! i ~ S88 45 19 W ' ~ ' 55.54 i ' vl SS 0 \ AVE. S88045'19"W ~ - i ~i ~ ° : " c:' `'~'C.,' A: • . . , . • , . : • ~ . • 1~ ; ` . t~1.1 t• ~ , ~ • • . • . a 1}~...s ~ ~j'~ i, ~ Y .c ~ . ~ , J . ' :~r •n ` • ~P. ~f~. : * ~ . _ . . 'S 3 ..!-,.~':,~'3'~. ' t ? :I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~i0T?I PLAN ~ ~4` . ~ . . . . . . . ' ' . _!%f1 ' t .t~-.!\.S 1 .i . `'ti ; r ; ' • . - , t i • . . , • :~r . F~: . ° ...ei}:,°• S W ( r ..t 'k • • . . ~ . ,,•C~q; . l'.•.t , . . ~ ~ ;I' ~ ~ ~r( : = O~~OG ~!'~SLJ ~ 5~ ; . • _ . . ' 'r •i .f:• ` r.~:' 1 `7 • . • - I . . !,`,i ' ~ LOT 7-:,.BLOCK~ 1 NQ~ RTH - .a . t • ; ~ 34875 ~ ;P.~~ : . . : S.C,AL.E:• ~ ~ _ , _ „ ~ A N-TA.... .R.O-S 30 o s cls,, BRADLEY HE SI~IVAL lGHTS ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ - _ ~ ' '~+'.r,tT•>~+~~"Y~~•,r,~~ •~~r~~•~"`"v'.~t~~~ k~~' r, , _ ~ , : ~'%Y~rI~ .i .C.:: ' ~ '1~ ' , . " ~ • ~ + , ~ ~ ~ . + r .'I~s: . • • ~ . C/L ROAD 30.0' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY ~ 12.0' BORDER EASEMENT ' ~ IL i 18.5' PAVEMENT WiDTH 10.0' FACE 0~' ~~6.0' WALK~ ~ CONCREIE SIDEWALK 2.0' 6.0 .2.0' s No- SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB-1 2` , - ~ . ~ . , . ~ • - . - . , . ; ~y . ~ . . . . . . . . . MISS'ION ~ :,A1I E~ ~NUE ~ ~ ~~~DRAII~AtE C~ ROSS SECTION WITHOUT DRYWELL : ~ ~ , i -a; . - - . . ~7 11. D . . . _ . • . . i,.,~ ~Y~ V ' • : . , , . : t, ~W ~,.y~ • • ~ ~ ` ! , ' ? . ~ M4iSSJ.ON A VEN U E QRAINAGE SECTIQN: I~ORTH ` ' NO' SCALE S.ANTA ROSA PARK..'. ~ . , ' . ~ BRADLET HEIGHTS . - . . - OCPIR£S: OCT. S. 2000 ~ 15' REAR YARD SETBACK 65.45' N 88°45' 19"E 0 ° 5' SIDE YARD ~ o ~ SETBACK ~ 5' SIDE YARD SETgACK I ~ N 25' FRONT YARD 8 SETBACK 0 STA. 6+17.39 TO 12' BORDER 3: STA. 6+47.39 EASEMEN T ~-_J- ~ 6' X 30' SWALE 5' FUTURE ~ BOT. AREA=180 S.F. ° BOT. EL. =1958.06 ACQU I SI TI ON oI ~ z ~I 8 S-°-"~ i 9 E ~ -65.45 . , ~ _ j- ~ SPOKANE COUNTY S88045)19))W CURB INLETS TYPE 1 - - - C/L STA. 6+ 21. 39 ~ SS 0\ AVE. ~ I.E.=1958.31 W C/L STA. 6+ 43. 39 I.E.=1958.44 ~ (INLET WIDTH=2') W U . ~ - : . . . ~ ~ ..i. • . . . . . . - . 't:.< i." ~ ' ~y y~,,,-'I:•i. Y . a~ ' . ' . . , ~t•d.. a .p-~ ~ ~ ' . . , . .a~. . t f..~ ~ . . - .,..~9 . LO'T PLAN . _ . . . ~ - ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ t 5 W. ~ ~ . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . , ' ~ . ` ' ' ~ ~~5~'~' WA S . • , . . . . , . . , . , . . . . ~ ~ . . • • ~ • . ~ i . - . • • : • ~ ' ~ / AORTH 34875 .LOT 8 BLOCK 1 ,S-AN=-TA'-: ROSA -'.P-A-RK'. . . ..-S.CALE: I°' = 309-0" SION AL B R A D L E Y H E I G H T S IEXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ ~ ~y~'i~yJ~'~Ce'~,►td~'I!.'t'~~""'' '~~~',•,~:~i~ . ~ ~y L7' , ;•,'r M ~ ~ „ E , ~ . , ~ . ~ ' . ~ . . . : . ' . .'S' ,t • ~ r i~ ,r~r= • ~ S ' : ~~O •1•~ , ' ~r` • ' ~ • • ' ' ~ j • • _ _ ' ' . ' . . C/l ROAD 30.0' EXISIING RIGHT OF WAY 12.0' 60RDER EASEMEN T ~ 18.5' PAVEMENT 1MDTH ~ 2.0' 10.0' FACE OF 6.0' WALK ` im- ; 0- ~ CONCREIE StDEWALK 2.06.0 ' am-_ 2.0' SPOKANE C4UNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB ~2 t y ~ , 7...~,•~•,, ~ f,. 7. ._.r:' '.t.. > - ~ . . ~ • , . .y,- . . . ' - '~:2~ _Ai . .i~- _ i! , • . . , . . ~~l ! . . , ~ • ~ll ~ f1 i . , . . . -i . ' ~ , , . i r • . ~ ~ 1 . . . . i~~y ' ' : ~r;~ , ° " ~CROSS SECTION WITHtJUT DRYWELL ~~0~~ ~~~V M ~~~I~ E~_.. ~ R A~l~ AGE • ~b.i 4'~ Y V ;'1 . ,t j t ;•r..~rA ..~r~ Y ~ Ov ~ i.• ~ . ~ ' • . ~ • ~ . ~ . 3...i ' 1 . . . . • ~ i • •j : .JI ~•t ~l, r A VEN U E - NMISSLON ~ti. ~ . : . . . ~IORTH ~DRAINA .}~,GE, SECTiQN~ ' ' ~0 SCALE fK . A . SANTA'.ROSA P. RK. : < - , ~ , . _ ► .,j ~~~'I ~SRADLEY;,.,. HEI.GHTS - . ~ . . . . . . . . . . ` . r,:.T.'' ' r OCPtR£S: OCT. S. 2000 ~ ' , t I 15' REAR YARD , SETB ACK 6 5. 45 ~ N 8 g°4519"E - 5' SIDE YARD 0 o SETB ACK N Q O c.1 ~ 5' S1DE YARD O ~ ' BORDER SETg ACK 12 ~ 25' FRONT YARD , EASEMENT SETBACK STA. 5+27.37 SP OK AN E COU NTY ~ ~ o TYPE B DRY'WELL ~ ~~p EL.=1957,63 z ~ . z I . 6 5 45' SPDKANE COUNTY CURB 1NLET TYPE 1 5' FUTURE S88°45 C/L STA. 5+35.25 - ACQUISITION ~ I.E.=1957.71 0.\ AVE~ , ~ SS' WIDTH_2) TO (INLET ~ STp,. 5+06.00 0 STA. 5+51.00 Cy- 2.5' X 45' SWALE W ~ AREA-112.5 S.F. s gQT. 7.13 0 BOT. EL. _ --19 5 lLJ cy U , .•".r .~...'~i..r t . ~ . ' ` i z • . - I ..:i`'~i's `".r ~ • . ~ ~ . , . . i'~ ~ ; L~ _ ~ ~ ~ . e.• . : • . . . ' v ia-~~ a k~ , 1~• - - ~ • f d~ . i .t _ ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ it t „ • b~ ta[' s' tr s tin a ~r ~ . ~ , . ' ,p~ , ti~ . ~.•.a~ ~ ~ . ~,Y~ ' ~ ~ `,9 eA' . . . . . _ L. • '•~i . . ' g ~ ~t:T PLAN W. was~ ~s ~ } . . • : ~ 1 ' ~ , r. ,~~.~:j , , j~4:' O O r O t ' . . • • ' .J;'', . :N* ~y • 1~; ~ u • • . ' , • • • . , • yµM{~ ~ ~ ~~•~I ' ( ' 1... ~ . . • . `.Jt.. ~ ~0.4. L + ~ . ~ • 1 C~ ~ , . ' : - . ' ' i . . ' ' ' • - ~ ~,,~0 ~ 34875 `4::) ` . . ' . . . , IST~~'v . . . . . _ . . NpRTH `SSIONAL . . . Y. . . , _ E. ~ - ._...B:~.Q,C~~~..:~~~<...••:~.~~...._._'~....-..{~SCAL 1 = L0~ g „ 30~ - S A N T A R OS A P ARK ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9. Zooo mom EY HEIGHTS gRpDL ~L^"• ~ r , . . , . . _ • . - •I. .'k~ ..~~~.-Li+r..a~r-`b,'i`~e~`~+4~'~s~~ q,~.~ ~"1. - ~ ~ - ~sS.y. - . ~ . r •~i~,"',T~" z ~ .s • • ~2 . ` ~ : .M ~ ~rr;y ~.'ti,i>~'-.J..:SrS.+l~~7~`~ . , ' ; f ~ ' {F, r a ~ ~ . , " ' . ~ . ~ . . : . . . ' - Y • _ T~ • e _+F5#4 {=r lr" ' t.Mr CA ROAd ~ 30.0' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 12.0' BORDER EASEMENT~ ~ ~ ' a t ~ 18.5PAVEMEI~T WJDTH , + ~,}0~~. ~ 0.~ ~~fi.~0 WALK~ ~ONCRETE SlDEWAL{ ~3.75~j 2.5' 3.75~. SPOKANE C(XlNTY CURS INLET ~ TYPE 1 _ • SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CtJRB ~ 3 1 * ~ ~ GRAIE EL T+OP OF , SQD A r y • , - . ' ~ .t a . t'; i• . i: . _ •w~. ' - - . ' ' . . i~ ~ , _ ~ $ l _ ' ' " ° • K ' . v~ ra • • ~ -..,--Y- M-l~S]ON AVENu-EI-DR-,AK~AG'E CROSS SECTIO.N,.,..'IIITH DRYIIVELL ; . . ~ . y~` _F . . ~ . , , . ` } I r . • . : ' , f~ +f. F~ rF~ - ~ . ~ ' ~ f - ~p J~ k ^t ' - ' , . • ~ ~ ~.5 . ~ ~ • ' • ~ ~ ' 71 ISSIV 1 i AVENU E . • . , . - . ~ ~ DRAINAGESECT! OIV NORfiH uNO SCALE 04M SA I~ TA ~ ~ SA F'f = i~ ~ BRADLEY HEIGHTS oN~ . ~ ~~~RES: OCT. 9. 2MO 15' REAR YARD SETB AM gg°~5' 19" E - ~ N ~ 6 5.45 YARD ~ 5' SIpE Y o o SETB ACK 0 0 N N TA. 5+06.00 TO 0 0 ~S ~ ' SIDE YARD ~ STA. 5+ 51.0 5 ' X 45 SwALE SETgACK ~ 2.5 S.F. YARD pT. AREA-112. 5 2~~ FRpNT YA . `r B ~=1g57.13 ACK - ~ gOT. E SETg ~ o R ~ STA. 5+27.37 12, B~R~E z ~KANE COUNTY ASEM T SP E TYPE g pRYWELL 0 5' FUTURE o~ LID EL =1 g57.6 A~QUISITION ow , , Sgg°45' 19'~ w ~ . ~ ~ - ~ SPaK AN ECpU NTY ~ 1r~" ~B `NLET TYPE ~ S88045 ~~R 5~-35.25 ~c~~ STA. j~rlE• . ss`I.E.==1957.71 ~ (INLET WIDTH 2') l ~ ;`r-~.... . • . • • . . . , • J . . i.....r' ..i. ~ . . . w ~ . . ' . , ~ ~ . Jt; ,Y..~: , ~ . • , . ~ , s. . _ ' ' . . ' ~ t t~{ti•r1;-.C . ~ . . . . . Y} ~ .+.dY'~9~ •-[14f .LN ' . ' . ~t _.~..ll' :1.~ ~ 1~ • ~ ? Q~~ ~ S ~x~ ~+i ' . ~ , : 3 n . n » ,•4 tr ~ J.~ i 7., ~ '~tww' 8 r+af'"`~,-r~ yy;t • - 'r;: ~ +,y` ~ ~ h.a' y~.~ ' ' ' . . 5~ '~~'i.~~~+~}`~• ~,rS~.;~`' ` `~4 ~ . ~~1..-. _.~y . . • r'.: . . ~ a r. r . ~yi~ . , . . . . •.y'~''\ : ha..q ~ PLj~ N W. ~ ' • • `4 ~ ~ ~ s~ . _ . . . . ~ . . . . ~:Q ~`t. ~ti~,s '°1~.,~ M......._ . 1 . • ( . tt', .,~i-.4~ ,e f „"t„~.~. -t ~ ~ r,AJ~I ~~t . ,',••.I• . .'t 1 ^ ~ ♦ . { S ! ..1 . ~ I 'y'~ • ' . . . . . . ~tt~.~,~. ~ °,5 ..p ~ ~i ' , , i ' , • ~ ~ 4875 ~ . ~ lsT~~`~q ;N pR TH . . 30' IpNAL ' . ' ~ 'b.. . . . : i:/ <_•V. Ci. +:.y •t r~:.:~~.. % a e" ~ ~ ' LOT. 10 - oCT.9.20ao . TA ROSA PARK ~ EXPIRES: BR AD SAN ~ I.EY HEtGHTS trSw-' ~ o • • . , ~ ~.~r..~ .).s: w. ~r :i '1Cai~:~ !~~~'}~/~i!~-./,`~'•~:~,AI'~R Ci'. _ ~ , r. ♦ - t~J' iII'~~y~~~yy ~'~1 - ,r,~. ) . ' ~ 1 ' . • • , . . ~ ' ~ . ' ~ R;~11 ` ' ``4 . 4 • V~"9~~~~r~ n ''.cQ, ' ' . • i ~ C/L ROAD ~ 30.0' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 12.0' 80RDER EASEMENT . ~ ~ t ~ 18.5 PAYEMENT WID7H ~ 10.0 FACE OF ~~6.0 WALK ~ ~ CONCRETE S10EWALK ~3.75'~ 2.5' ~3.75" SPOKANE COUNIY CURB INLET TYPE 1 SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB--\ \ - ~ to ~ 3 ~ GRATE EL. TOP OF ~ SOD yY g r,Y . - . J . ' . ' . , . ~.r ~ + • . • . - . ~~i:_ f• - . . ' • . - • r-.. y. • " S . . 1 . , ~ , ~ . 5• • ~ ,~;8+,•►.•', 'a'`y~s , 5~ • • :~s'~'?~~='Cf-'`•~ r~ .v, ° r it ~ rs . i a.: r * 5..;. i... ~ • ~ 1 „ . . ' ' a ~ ' ' ~ ~4 ~ ' . tV' i ~ ..a± ."+•'41 h IS.SION - AVENU~E 'D'RA('NA►GE CROSS SECTiON WITH DRYWELL ~.Y~^, - : ..S"y :t:'TL~ `'S t,•s!,'~~. . . • c~' `~t' 3 ' - . Y . ' 1.~• . ' 'i l~4,' ` ~V ~ ~ i~ ~ . . '1: ~ . , , _~~.J1. ' .,.a.+i•r,i' O~~O~ WA~~ , . - . ~ . , • . ~ ~ ~ ~ lrs. '~D , , , . . . ; . ~ • . . . , . ~ ~ ~ , . , . . . • ; , " , , .•.i. . . . 1 • x + . MISSION: AVEN E~ . . . . ~ ~ =ti.y . ~l. ' . . , . ~ . . . ~:NORTH DRAI N AGE ~ SECTI:.O'N . . . . . .*r., . ~O 948?~ c` . . SAf~:TA-. ~R~OSeA="-R-ARK~-.-~- NO SCALE ~ 6RADL EI HTS ~NAL ` DCPIRfS: OCT. 9. 2000 i z i • ~ 20' WATERLINE f ~ 0~ EASEMENT -meow 10' ~ , 15' REAR YARD 10 ' T ~ 65.45 SETBACK N 88°45 1 g„E - 5' S I D E Y A R D - ~ a SETBACK N O O N 5' SIDE YARD ~ . o SETBACK 's- ~ - - ~ 25' FRONT YARD 4+23.21 TO SETBACK ~ ~ STA. ~ STA. 4+ 39. 71 12' BORDER 6' X 16' SWALE 0 EASEMENT gOT. AREA=96 S.F. ° 5' FUTU R E ° BOT. EL.=1957.1 z ACQUISITION 0z ~ . 6 5 . 4 5' ~ SPOKANE COUNTY o l~~ CURB INLET TYPE 1 S88 45 1 g W, C/L STA. 4+ 27.71 o AvE. I.E.=1957.45 ~ SS WI D TH_ 2 (INLET ) ~ i 1.~.~` _ ,.r j : • . . .r ~ ~ • .I. ' ~ . { ' ~ . ~ . - ti ~ t . • . • . . . 1 ~ ~ , l ~ ~''j ,y~~~l, ~ ' ~.i' • . . . ~r , , ~ • . ~ . . ...~.i~ . ` i ` . f' . t ~ ~ ~ ' • ~ • . ~ , r , 4 r • • • ~ t frL; . . . . u-• ~ , . . . . C, `r~: , . t _ . ~ - ~ . . k... „ t0:T;a PLAN . W. O~QgWAS~I :~`s . ' _ ♦ ' , • . . ~ ~ . . . _ . • . . • . _ ' `~,w ' . . , . ~ _ . . i ~ - , . . ' • . . • . ' • • '~'O ~ 34875 ~ ~ 4~ ~ ' ~1 r t. ~ . ~ KOR TH ~ ~~GISTE~'~' ti~ . J „ LOTy ..1--1- :BLOCK.. :1 W -~sc~ALE~: l,p ! 301 -0 IONAL ~ SANTA ROSA PARK T S ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ BR ADLEY HEIGH j % s~#s1'~/~~ ^ ' ~ ~ _ / ~ C'. ~ r „rY r' , -%s~ _ . , .4' - . . . . ~ • • ts'T~ x ~ -a ~t a,, • • tY~,;► 4 'r r t'~ ~l?1: s, : r...:. „ ' ~ , . ~ ' . ' ' • , . . S~*k~~ . . . ' t • . . . _ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , , . ~ ~ .'t• . • . C/l. ROAD ~ 30.0' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 12.0' BOROER EASEMENT , . , ~ . 18.5 PAVEMENT WIDi~i 12.0 ` 10.0 FACE OF ~6.0 WALKy ~ CONGRETE SIDEWALK 2,0' 6.0' 2.0 SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 SPOKANE COIINTY TYPE `8' CURB , r -ti' . ~r' f..r Y' •q I 'r " ' • ' ' • ' ~ _ . = I,".,..',.... <;; - ' •7 : ` ` ^ ~1'~~~lhG~R:1.:4.. . . . ~ ' . ,s.,~ ~ t ~ • r" S ~ 4''; . , ~ . , , , ~ . • , , . . • ' ` ~ . . . SS' ll ~i~~`►.a'{ r ~ • ! . . ~ . : 4 . . ~ . t - JVENU E D R-AjiN°~-GE' ~'CROSS SECTION VVITHOUT DRYWELL i -A ~AI-S~SI ON , . . . M_ - . . , ' ~ ~'s~~.~~~4:. - . ~ . . . •~4. • , _ . • . ;•.u ~ ~ ~S ~ A , . ~ . ~ V ~ . • . _ • . . ' • ~ ~ . ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ' MI~SSION ' AVENUE .R TH DR~~4,1 N AGE . SECTION N O . _ . ~ ~ SANTA ROSA-. NO SCA~E ~GrS ' ~ a , . . _~1 . . . .r . . - • V~ BRADLEY HEIGHTS ~ OCPiRE'S: OC7. 9, 2000 ~ ~ 0' 20' WATERLINE , 10 EASEMENT , ' REAR YARD 1-0-~•- ~ 15 SETB ACK 6 5. 45, ~ N 88°45' 19" E - o 5' SI D E Y AR D o I ~ o SETBACK N 0 O N ~ 5' SIDE YARD O SETBACK ~ j 2 ~ 25' FRONT YARD ~ SETBACK ~ ~ 12' BORDER EA,SEMENT L~-- STq. 3+ 21. 53 o ~ Z 5) FUTURE SPOKANE COUNTY ACQUISITION TYPE B DRYWELL L1D EL.=1956.96 ~ ~ _ - - ~ ow 65.45' SP OK AN E COU N TY ~ )19 CURB INLET TYPE 1 STA. 3+ 19 . 25 TO S88045 ~ C/L STA. 3+ 47 . 51 STA 3+ 49.25 ~ AVE. I.E. =19 57.04 2.5' X 30' SWALE SS 0~ (INLET WIDTN=2') gpT. AREA=75 S.F. g OT. EL. =19 56 . 46 ` 1`' ' • ;;r, ' . . . i._ ^y•., J G. ti ~ ~Yy ` ..7 :le~~~a~ . _ • . ' ' , , . : i vti : f~,~ ~.i<lia~ns..,~~t`S•... . r ~1'. . , , Y•,•t..,. ' .i.'l•..it '~~.0... y~ . t~+.`~ _ , . . . . . . _ . _ . . . . . . Y , i . ► ; } OT ; ~ L A N ~s ~ '.~•~~~r ~.~~~.+Ae + ."l•....' i' ~ WAS~t ~ . ; • ' r, . . , t':,j~' ~ ! . . . , , ,'C .}'F.' i• .',i~ i~ ~ .r f;;~ . I`~,. ~ 34875 . . . . : ~ . . . ; ~ . ~ d0 N ~ TH 30' - p,. SIONAL ~ Y~ L OCK ~ .1•• ~ : ~ r : ~t ~ . . S AL.E: LO T. . .I . 2.f~., - ..t:.. . . ~ ~ S A N T- A . R. O~S A_ `P~A R K~~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, Zooo 1 GHT S ~ BR ADLEY HE - `~f'w"' ~ . • • j, . • • •j,,..}.a:~._...w,:.~t' - ~ ~ . . ~4!~!l7~~„'G~!'~-'S%"'lry`•i7~` ' 7k.!:~'rv ' .}7c"w~s. - ` ' • 'r', • . , ~ M + ' 'S2 ' 9, t . .h Y, > r~ ~ ~~~l~. ~„ti ;r?''Sf'~Y. 2~.~rtr'~: '~Q. ~ • - • • . .~4~~_..,: '`.r. C/L 40AD 30.0' QCISTING RIGHT OF WAY ~ 12.0' BORDER EASEMENT ~ T Y ~ 18.5' PAVEMENT WIDTI-i ~M -NK10.0' FACE OF 6.0' WALK~ ~ CONCRETE S'10EWALK ~3.75~1 2.5' =3.75~ SPOKANE COUNTY GURB INLET TYPE 1 SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB--N \ ~ ~ 3 ~ GRATE EL. TOP OF , SOD r ~ r ° s' • s! ~ - ~ . ' ' ' • _ ' • ~ . ' . . j , . - • . , , , t ' : y.c~;•"r' ' ' • ~ ' . . , .a r. ` , , • . , : 9Fo t~~ j' +'Y . ~ ' 4 . • ~ + ' , ' • ' ~ ~ '1 - ~ ~ i„ _ • . • .r . ' . . . . , , ~ f . • ' M-ISSION ~ AVENUE ~DRAIN'AGE.. 4CROSS SECTION UVITH DRYINELL wAS~,r M`SSION ~ A VENQ E- -91 DRAINAGE. ._SECTION:-:. NORTH . o SANTA ROSA ~PAR.K~".:-<:~....~~~. ~.-:.NO scALE ONAI, 6RADLEY HEIGHTS ` OCPIRES: OCT. 9. 2000 i ~ ~ e 65 . N~-~ » E > p,RQ 5 RE g8° ~-5 A9 ;E~B AC~ ~ETB RC~ 3+2A` 5 3 v ~ ~ ~OI~ ANE C ELL P c~ A 95696 ° D o~ 1 9.25 T0 g .25 5~g 3+ ,S~ ALE 1 X 30 ,F . , FRpNT _ 2.5 cA_75 5 25 AR 46 ~-~gp,C ~ ~ ~ g a~ . ' B0ROE 12 N-~ ~ FUTUR~ , cQUN~Y 1 ACQV~S 55 ~~5 Sp aK p,NE S 1`~PE 1 A.10 sTP 2+6 0 A g' ~N C~L 55.93 g8 ~~7~---- - I .E • - ~g 3 + 47.5~ ~ o S _ S-r ~ . 5~ . 25 f ~~~S~ 0~A _ ~ 2+ 957.04 -2~ 1A~ S .25 M V~lIDTHS S~ p~~ 2+7C 1~~E C~N~-ET : x 19S~ q.S.F• ~O goT ' AREA ~.~1955-6 goT~ ~ _ ; ~ { • . . : ; . , • .x. , . x , , . . - , . ' I,,4. • .;,,.,t` "i' ~~T ' • . _ K~ 1 . , r• _•i~- C~ It. p,N *AS I ~ t,~ - . • - _ - ' - ~ ~oi~±"`~ ~ O + ~ ' : . , . ~ . • ~ . ~ - " ~ ' ^ ~f. . O ! .i ~ . - ' ~ . . • , .a4-i. *c J +.~.,,,i ` Y • M ~ ~ ' " ' ' • ~ ~~s ~ ~ . i ~ ~ ' ~ S • ' , , ' ~ • , , r i , `w "~'V., ~F ' i " . ` ~1' • ' 3 ~ ~ r34$75 IST~~~ ~ . ~ ~SSIONAL ~ R ~ - • - ~ ~ . BIs.~1CK R 0 S A P p,RY\ ~ s s AN T I~►N ~,Y NE sDl. _ . ' • 'c~~ ~ ' ~v r~. ~ . ` ; ! _ ~+`.~'~,~C : . v~f..~l►' . . . . - • • ' C/l ROAD 30.0' EXISIING RIG-IT OF WAY ~ 12.0' 80ROER EASEMENT , i ~ [ r 18.5' PAVEMENT WIDTH 10.0' FACE OF so.-Go6.0' WALK~ ,44 CONCRETE SlDEWALK 2.0' 6.0' 2.0 -.a i SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 1 SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB--\ j r ; ' e' _ ~ ' ~ - ~ . • . . ~ . - - . . • - - ' - . . , . . . . . • ~J ~ . . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ - ' ~ ' • ~ ~ 4.=• i.f . ' , ' Y ii~ ~j'i. •.+y • ' • '3 ' ' ' • r ' • ' ~ r • M~ISSION- A-VENUE DRAINAGE-*CROSS SECTION WITHOUT DRYWELL , r` • ~ . . . , .,•s • ' . . `~~~5 ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . , . , ' I • . ' - O~ t~ ~ ' . . . • - ; ~ ' ' . - . „ , • • ~ ~ MlSSION .AVENUE E. . ` ~ - ~ : r'• • j . . . N 0 R TH DR'al N AGE -SECTI ON. ~ - NO SCALE SAN~TA".R:OSA--P=ARK, GIST ~NAL ~ 6RAQLEY HEIGHTS O(PlRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ •J 4 ~ ~ 15' REAR YARD SETBACK 63.29' N 88°45' 19"E ~ 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK i --rl 5' S I D E YA R D 0 A o T ACK o SE B STA. 2+14.85 o cv SPOKANE COUNTY ° ~ TYPE A DRYWELL 25' FRONT YARD LID EL.=1955.08 i SETBACK ~ STA. 2+ 57. 25 TO 12 BORDER ~ o!~ STA. 2+ 76. 25 EASEMENT o ~ 6' X 19' SWALE 5' FU TURE a z BOT. AREA=114 S. F. ACQUISITION z ~ BOT. EL.=1955.60 I 6 5 . 4 5' ) SPOKANE COUNTY STA. 1+93.92 TO S88045' 1 g"W CURB INLETS TYPE 1 STA. 2+18.23 - - ~ C/L STA. 1+97.92 2.5' X 25' SWALE \A SS 0\ AVE. I.E.=1955.16 BOT. AREA= 62. 5 S. F. C/L STA. 2+ 61.10 BOT. EL. =1954. 58 I. E. =1955. 93 (INLET WIDTHS=2') . J. r Y • . . ~ ~ ~ : ' t , . . _ . . : . . . ~ ea :".r: , ~ . . . - ' ' • - • 'a _ e , _ . _ . . - ' • . , ~ • , ~ } . a >•,y . • • - . • • . . _ _ . . , ~ ~r~ . . . -..t .L.O7' .,PLAN wAS~ ~ - . , . , 34875 LOT 1.4.. BLOCK - , „ GISTE~ S A N TA R 0 S A P A R K SCALE: 1= 30 - o SIONAL ~ B R A D L E Y H E I G H T S IEXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 . 1 `~~r► ' . . . 1 . " , ^ 1^ ~ ~ 12,0' BORDER EASEMENT,F cL ROAD 30,p' EXISTING R{GHT OF WAY ~ qCE OF 6.0R WALK~ L j 2 0f 10.0F ~ 18.5' PAVEMENT W1DTH CONCRE't'E SIDE 3WALK .75 L ~3.75'~ 2.5 a- SPOKANE COUNN CURB INLET TYPE I URB-~, ` . SP4KANE COUNT`( ~E B C 3 ~ GRATE EL., f TOP OF _ SOD f ~ ~ • • ' . ~ . . ~ - ~ - ~ . ' , - . ! ' . ' ~ ~ ' c . , . . , ~ . M 1 ` ~ ' Ef ~h.tt~~ ' 1.. . ' u . ~ ~ . .r •n~'a', C t r ~ssr :i i~. Y:~.. i. , • ' ' • t . ~t rF : . - . . . . ITH DRYWELL . T1oN W ~s SEC s ~ . ~N p,GE ~~RO ~ . . _ . - NUE~ DR . ~ ~ NI-ISS10N 'WAS,~~~ . ; ' . , . ~ • G' • , , • , ~ • ' " - ~ ~ r . . ••Y ~j { ,Si • ' ~ i.. . ` ' ~ ~ ^ ` ` ~ ~"~Y ~ , AVENUE;:, NORTH ISS14N M SE . . .CTI ON~~._ . ~ . . . No SCALE ~:~slp pR p,1 N AGE N~ S TA ROS A PARK s ti pCPIRES.oa. g. 2000 I . BRADLEY HEIGHT ~ , • . ~ ~ u O > ~ OC) ~ O r-- W o (D ~o ~ o ~ W 25' FRONT YARD SETBACK , 20' BORDER EASEMENT ~ ~P o 5 SIDE YARD ,4~„W SETBACK! S4803728.61' S88°48,40„W 128.71' ~ 00 0 o o~ ;4-) ~ j 0 oo co . CO ~ o o QO o ~ < z o ~ I < ~ N 88°4519"E 187.64 ~ 5' SIDE YARD ~ 20' WATER SETBACK . . EASEMENT , . ~ . . ~ 15' REAR YARD SETBACK LOT.:PL-AN , . . . ~ . , . . . ~ o~ was~ NORTH L OT 15 B L 0 CK ~o ,Qc, 34975 ~ "SCALE: 1 30' - 0" ~ IST SANTA ROSA PARK ~NAL BRADLEY HEtGHTS ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ ♦ ~ r . , . 70' - ~ 50.0' R/W ~ C/l CUL-DE-SAC 43.0' ; 12.0' i 5' WALK 20' BORDER EASEMENT ~ - CONCRETE SIDEWALK 3 '25 O 3 A W A Q ~ p SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE '6'CURB REFER TO SPOKANE COUNTY ¢ STANDARD PLAN A-3 ~ ~ 0 0 0 d S d / CL O p0 3 A (`7 ru , , . M . . , . . ' . f1J ~ ~ - • • . ~ • • - • - . ~ . ~ . . EDGERTON COURT DRAINAGE G.ROSS SECTION WITHOUT DRYWELL ~ . : ~ , . . (HALF- CUL-DE^SAC SECTION) 0 - . F A EDGERTON .COURT DRAINAGE SECTION ~ . _ AL~o 34875 ww~ SANTA ROSA PARK NORTH t~.sCISTER CD IONAL CD BRADLEY, HEIGHTS NO SCALE Q Q ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ ~ µ c 1 a ~ ~ 25' FRON T YARD O SETBACK U I i 5' SIDE YARD 0 SETBACK 1 Cy 20' BORDER EASEMENT ~ W ~ „ . r S88048,40 W 1, 39.83 0 ~ r LLJ r , 5 20 o~ ' N ~ ° o PO 1 ~ ~ j ~ S88°48'40"W 128.71' -5' SIDE YARD S48°37'47"W SETBACK 28.61' ~ 15' REAR YARD SETBACK .~r,y.w~,.1~~ ,rY.~.w t. , • . - . ~ t 4' r ~ • ~ I t .rf . ~ : :4 p.4 ' , " • . , • ; . ''e .Wi. , • `t! . - , . . . . ~ . . . ~ ~ •1 '~"3 " 1.~ e . . • ~ n : ~ ~ ,d_ . ♦ .r s' Fi • `rys .t1' ' T' • . „ ~ , b ~ . r. • ~ • ~ +Jrn l • ! . ti . . ~ _ . . . , . . . . . . y. . ~ ~ . ~ , i ~ , ~ ~ ~ . . _ . . . . . ;c L.Z,O.T, _ P,-L AN ' . . . •.,v. . ' ` 4•t _ _ . • . ~ • ~ ' -°t,: ' , ` ~J Il. WAS • ~ . i. ' ~ ~ • - ` • ' • 'r . ' 0 ~,`1j , , , , • . ' • . : f • , . • ' , ~ ~ I ~ L 0 T 4'1 , 6 BL0 C K* 1 ~ :rN 0 RT$ 34875 w SCALE: ..,a 30' o'~ ~CIST NAL BRADLEY HEIGHTS ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 j 4 l / ~ ~ , 70' • s 50.0' R/W ~ ~ C/L CUL-OE-SAC 43.0' 12.0'1 5' WALK 20' BOROER EASEMENT rn - CONCRETE SIOEWALK 3 Z3 O 3 ~ A W A , Q O SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B'CURB F' REFER TO SPOKANE COUNTY Q STANOARD PLAN A-3 / v 0 0 0 a S d / d O m 3 A N 1~ ~ f ~c-` : t~ d._ . . ° - : ~ • . L . _ ' t N ~ t~ • .:~.i . s . . ' ' , :i.'. ; ' . ' ~ ( ~ ~••+Y• ~ t • - , • ` ' ~ T ,t r i ` ~ j . ON ,1 _ • ' : ~r, • r,•,? ~ ~-ED~-ERTON ~ COUf~.T'.'DR ~_AI + -N'AG.E ~CROSS SECTION WITHOUT DRYWELL ~ ~ , . _ ~ ~ l(H ArL~F ; CU'1~~.='-D'E- SAC SECTI ON) ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . s ~ o 3 ~ , . • ~9 A EDGERTON.COURT ~ . . ~ . . ~ . DRAIN AGE~ SECTION- ~S, CISTER 34e75 S A N.TA R.0 S A* P A.R K.,`.,.~_,,_ -~=N OR TH I~NAL o , - . . _ . . . , , ~ ~ BRADLEY HEIGHTS NO SCALE Q Q ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9, 2000 ~ ~ , ' - + 5 r~. 45 ~ I . ~ . ~ ~LE ~,N D ` gEGIN ~ OUN~`( ~ POKANE C 2 (41 ~ ~ S ~NUET CURg 955.69 AT c ~ a O E._1 LLJ CJ TT ' Ep,- 3d~ S 1 N1- AR L_~ g 55 .1 2 E ASEME ~ BaT~ E p' BOROER , E Y aRD 2, g1' ~ ~r. ~ ~ SID _ , ~~E ScTg ~'`CK N 88" 48 40~-' ~ 00 ~ ~ • ` ~ ~ ~~000 ~ a . , / U N I 2a' cf'~ I O l , c9 O J . „ ~ 139. . ~ SSB~ FR ~.g,~-o ► ~ r pN1 Y ARO I ` , SETB AC~ ~ ~ 1BACK ~ 3+83 REAR A ~2~ - SE RD ENp A ~ S\N ALE F3ACK . 3~"~'8`82 09 .14 ~ SET S~~ NE CQUNT ~.-STA- 4~ E-SAC SPp~~' ~ RYWE~ C/~ L CU~'Q PE ~B 1.955.6A { 1 . , t ` ~ • 'a; ` . ~ , . ' , ~ -~a ' . ~ ' ' ' , . ' .q , 1 i . ~ ; k ~ . , . . . • - , ~ - ' , ~ . i ',t,.°~ ~ . - ~ ~ ' - , ''s' . ~ ~ - ` ~a'~.;•• ~ ~ W. ~ ` 4^ ` + p ~ , • , '•J~- `••t l`3 `f' ~ y~ oq~ p L A~ *AS.~ j ~ ~Pq • ' ~ - , . . ~ ; ~d,,~j ~sq GIST . .w , . ~ ~ , : , . ~ . ~~a ~ . RTH SSION~.ti „ N 30, -o ~ . ~ ~ . „ . 2Q40 SC A~E ~ ~ XpIRES~ ~C~ • 9. La-~= .17. gLO I Rasp` P ' S S AN 7 A i~,/IT 1~E . Y _ ~ Q Q dD1.E _ ~ C/L ROAD ~ 45.0' e-4 I 25.0' R/W ~ I ~ I 18.33' 2.0' S' WALK ~ ~ 16 20.0' BORDER EASEMENT I j ~ SPOKANE COUNTY TYPE 'B' CURB ~ 0) ~ CONCRETE SIDEWALK BEYOND j ~ c.i j F12.01 9.0' ~ I N j f SWALE BOTTOM j x LO I ~ i 2.0% - 4.5% ~ GRATE EL. ci I Q T 2 r _J o t i SPOKANE COUNTY CURB INLET TYPE 2 v 0 0 0 d S d / n.. 0 ~a 3 A O ~ M (5 . EDGERTON COURT DRAINAGE CROSS SECTION WITH DRYWELL in ~ . ~ 0 ~ 9)0 A EDGERTON COURT J DRAINAGE SECTION NORTH 34e75 o SANTA ROSA PARK NO SCALE ~SCISTE I4N ~ ° AL 0 BRADLEY HEIGHTS Q _ ~ EXPIRES: OCT. 9. 2000 ~ Q ~ ~ _ . RECEIVED Avista Utilities , 1411 East Mission PO Box 3727 10 2 U 0~ Spokane, Washington 99220-3727 Utiliri~s Telephone 509-48gU600 D~_~'~3K Toll Free 80a727-9170 June 7, 2002 . Mr. Larry Olson David Evans & Associates, Inc West 110 Cataldo Spokane, WA 99201 RE: Bradley Heights Subdivision Project No. MAHA0005-005 Dear Larry, In reference to the above plat, easements are satisfactory as shown. Please adjust dedication language to read as follows: "Utility easements shown on the herein described plat are hereby dedicated to utility companies which hold a franchise granted by Spokane County or other gcvernmental entity and are limited to those uses consistent with the construction, reconstruction, protection, maintenance and operation of said utilities, including gas, electricity, telephone and cable, together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim and/or remove brush and trees which may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of the same." ~ Froni time to tinie, cllnnges are ►nade to a plat or binding site pltcn, after octr review. Tlie inost trouGlcsonie for ccs is t/te establishntent of "Borcler Easenieitts, " placeinelit of sidetivalks inside a proposed utiliry easenient, aiid t/ee use of dry well locations not previously noted on a particular plan. It is very important that the serviiig utiliry is provided with adequate space within dedicated easencent strips to install gcrs, electric facilities and pact- ncoeutted transformers. Each of t/iese changes can interfere wit/i placemeiet of our facilities. May tive huve notice if sucla cl:anges are inade to this plat? If you have any questions, please feel free to concact me at (509) 495-8536. Sincerely, ~ l . • / ,Y ~ . Prisctlla Spr~ue~ Real Estate Assistant cc: Jim Falk, County Administrator Claude Kaler • An affiliato ui Avisoa Corp. ow RECEjVEp DAVID EVANS An,oASSOCIATES INC. OCT p g 2002 TRAN S M ITTAL SPOKME COU101'ENGINEER DATE: October 9, 2002 PAGES: 12 TO: Dave Berto TELEPHONE NO: FAX NO: FROM: Michael Christy/Rich Waltrip TELEPHONE NO: 509-327-8697 David Evans and Associates, Inc. FAX NO: PROJECT: Bradley Heights Plat PROJECT NO: ❑ AS YOU REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ RECORDS MANAGEMENT ~ FOR YOUR USE a iTEM COPIES DESCRIPTION 1 2 Bradley Heights Final Plat 1 1 Utility Letters 1 1 Updated Plat Certificate COMMENTS: For your review. Thank you, Michael Christy West 110 Cataldo Spokane WA 99201 Phone: (509) 327-8697 Facsimile: (509) 327-7345 RECEIVED ~ TC I JON 3 0 i99g DEA-SpK June 29, 1999 Gary W. Bryant . David Evans & Associates, Inc. 110 W. Cataido Ave. Spokane, 1/IJA 99201 , RE: Bradley Heights Subdivision & Brighton Place Subdivision Dear Gary, The utility easements for the above mentioned projects are adequate for our needs. I apologize for not getting you this information earlier. For future projects, send them directly to me. I'll try not to let any slip through. If you have any questions, please call me at 484-4931 ext.266 Sincerely, ~ . ~ . , _ Jim Clifford Design Engineer - TCI TCI of Washington 1717 E. 8uclceye Spakane, WA 99207 (503) 4844931 FAX (508) 483-9261 M Equal Opoortuniry Employer . ~f ► S P O K A N E C O • ~ U N T Y PLANMNG A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gary Oberg, Director GO_ ~V ~ MEVIORANDUM . TO: iT-r•ing nd Roa~ , caInsp:orC►a~t~l;Oll~17~~lil~Tf~'~r~i~n~,~' ~ ~ l NI- _ V1 , lo an • i ~ ~ b~al11lV Division of Engineering and Roads, Development Services, Bill Hemmings Division of Utilities, Information Services, Jim Red Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby Spokane County Fire District No. 1 Spokane County Water District No. 3 FROM: Jim Richardson, Planner S R DATE: February 25, 2000 RE: Proposed Final Plat of Bradley Heights; PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and for-,vard any comments to me by March 10, 2000. If you have any questions you may contact me at 477-7168. Yours in anticipation, JR Enclosure copy w/o enclosures: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. David Evans & Associates 1026 W. BROADWAY o SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 I'HONE: (509) 4777-7200 9 FAJC: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133 ► v F1RST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY EAST 40 TRENT AVENUE SPOKANE, WASH/NGTON 99202 (509) 456-0550 DIRECT LINE FOR SHERRY STOLZ 838-7594 _ SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE ORDER NO.: 142677-SS PROPOSED PLAT: NOT DISCLOSED UABILIN: $1,000.00 FEE: $150.00 TAX: $12.15 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, herein called the Company, SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS SET FORTH BELOW AND IN SCHEDULE A. GUARANTEES DAVID EVANS & ASSOC. herein called the Assured, against actual loss not exceeding the liability amount stated above which the Assured shali sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurances set forth in Schedule A. LIABILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS 1. No guarantee is given nor liability assumed with respect to the validity, legal effect or priority of any matter shown herein. 2. The Company's liability hereunder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurance herein set forth, but in no event shall the Company's liability exceed the liability amount set forth above. 3. This guarantee is restricted to the use of the Assured for the purpose of providing title evidence as may be required when subdividing land pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 58.17,R.C.W., and the local regulations and ordinances adopted pursuant to said statute. It is not to be used as a basis for closing aiiy transaction affecting title to said propercy. RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY F E g 10 2000 CURRFNT F'LANNING DMSION . Page 1 . ~ - : SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE ORDER NO.: 142677-SS SCHEDULE A The assurances referred to on the face page are: !l~~ _ r A. Title-is vested in: THE HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF DORIS M. CHAPADOS, WHO ALSO APPEARS OF RECORD AS DORRIS M. CHAPADOS, DECEASED (SEE PARAGRAPH 4 HEREIN), AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST, AND DANIEI EUGENE MARSILLO, AS HIS SEPARATE PROPERTY, AS TO AN UNDIVI~ED 1 /2 INTEREST. ~ B. at according to the Company's title plant records relative to the foilowing described real property (including those records maintained and indexed by name), there are no other documents affecting title to said real property or any portion thereof, other than those shown below under record matters. The following matters are excluded from the coverage of this guarantee: 1. Unpatented mining claims, reservations or exceptions in patents or in acts authorizing the issuance thereof. 2. Water rights, claims or title to water. 3. Tax Deeds to the State of Washington. 4. Documents pertaining to mineral estates. DESCRIPTION: Tract 4, SANTA ROSA PARK, according to plat recorded in Volume "B° of Plats, Page 78, in Spokane County, Washington; EXCEPT the West 158 feet thereof; AND EXCEPT that portion deedeti to the County of Spokane for Center Road per deed recorded July 18, 1963 under Recording No. 9517266. Page 2 ~ ti ORDER NO.: 142677-SS RECORD MATTERS: 1. General taxes for the year 2000, in the amount of $608.37 which amount cannot be paid until February 15, 2000. Assessed value of land: $36,500.00 Tax account no. : 45073.0505 NOTE: Said taxes may include Storm Water, Aquifer, Flood or Irrigation Assessments. 2. Contract of Sa1e and the terms and conditions thereof: Seller: Dorcis M. Chapados, a widow, and Eugene A. Marsillo, a divorced man Purchaser: James F. Mahar, a single person, d/b/a Jim Mahar Homes Dated: October 16, 1995 Recorded: October 19, 1995 Recording No.: 9510190275 Excise Tax Receipt No.: 9500014091 Seller's interest is now held of record by Daniel Eugene Marsillo pursuant to proceedings in Spokane County Probate Case No. 97400342-5 Affects: An undivided 1/2 interest Seller's interest is now held of record by The Heirs and Devisees of Dorris M. Chapados pursuant to proceedings in Spokane County Probate Case No. 98400728-3 Purchaser's interest is now held by Jim Mahar Homes, Inc., a Washington corporation pursuant to instrument(s) recorded June 9, 1997 under Recording No. (S) 4110087. Excise Tax Receipt No. 9700006981. 3. Sewer Rate Prepayment Agreement and the terms and conditions thereof: Between: Spokane County, Washington And: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. Recorded: December 19, 1997 Recording No.: 4171261 Page 3 ~ . Order No.: 142677-SS 4. Eugene Albert Marsillo died, leaving a non-intervention will Admitted to Probate: March 11, 1997 Spokane County Probate Case No.: 97400342-5 Personal Representative: Not disclosed Attomey for Estate: Richter-Wirnberley, P.S. Said Personal Representative is authorized to administer the estate without intervention of court and to mortgage, convey or contract to convey decedent's interest in said premises. Effective Date: February 8, 2000 at 8:00 A.M. . z\JtE f~s First American Title Insurance Company .4 • • • • • • • . '9 ~ ~ F ~ . ~ • Q ~ Q BY PRESIDENT SEPTfMBER 24, . d~ i968 y . ~ . BY ASSISTANT SECRETARY fI F 0 SS/Cjh Page 4 S C First American Title Company of Spokane Eost 40 Trent Ataenue • Spokane, WA. 99202 •(509) 456-0550 • FAX (509) 747-2761 . ~ VOLUME 8 PAGE /U SECTION TOWNSHIP RANGE ~ .~I'~i~.~~~/y ArE * 1 I ~~l l~ - 4 . _ . - . i1. ~ . ~ . . . . . - - ~ • 5 2T-~ ~ I 2 4 a - - -i- i . ' 7 - • ~ ~ 3 'f to • • 8s ~ ~s ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /YOR~9 .4ple (CAPITALTM 140P! A i • J ~ ' ! ~o • z . . ' ` ~ . . . • ~ • ~ . , . . . . . - • ~ ~ ~ • ~ - 8ID . 1109 . . ~ ALAk ~ (COLOFMP~ ~ ~ t~ f • 4 : p• h ~ . N r Th1s sketch is fumished as a courtesy oMy by Firsi American Tide Insurance Company and Is NOT a part of any tttle commitment or poiicy of tftle insurance. This sketch IS fumfshed solely fot the purpose of . assisting in lacat(ng the premises and does not purport to show ali highways, roads or easemenis effecting the property. No reltance should be placed upon this sketch for the location or dimensions of the property and no liability is assumed for the correctness thereof. ~ RI4HT OF WAY DEED 9517268 SODK ''817PAG117 ~ 4 n . . IN THF, MATTER of the CM R...RQ................................................... No...... ..~....7................... . , KNOW AI,L, MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That......... FE.~ ...ILLO , ~ and GR................................................................................................ his wife, of the County of Spokane, . ' in the State of Washington, in consideration of the bene6ts and other- valuable considerations, and the sum ~ . xtnNDREn..aND rto/ioo ($500. of FzvE.. . . ..00) ..............Dollars, paid h-'o by the County nf Spokane, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have grantcd, bargained, sold ancl conveyed, and by these ~ presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane County, the following described parcel of land, situated in Spokane County, in the 5tate of Washington, to-wit . . . . A strip of land..... .~Q .............feet wide c.....................7~cufc~~. ~Ctu......................... . ........_...............................................................................:....._........t........... r ~ . , . i Being--the..East..30..feet.-of..Tract.A..o~C..Sn,ta•RO~sa...F&r-k......:......'~. , _.L .A . ~ ' . Located in the Southwest Quarter .(SW.... .....1~~+ ..1............ , + _ ~ of Section.....7....... , Townshi p.....2 5 ......North, Range_... A r.,.W.M, ~ TO HAVE AND TO HOI,D the same, unto the said Spokane-County for the purposes'of a public roacl , f arever. ' , p In witness hereof ........................have hereunto set...... ~.......hand.... and seal.,S. this.......✓. . day of . ,19....63.. ~ . . ~ . . (Seal) .~..'...~R...-c.~.~ ....(Seal ) hus b'and and wif e (NOTE: If married, must be aigned by both husband and wife.) ~ . . . , . , • ~ (Fam CR 655 - 1M - 2-61) . . . . . . • - , . , . 4. . ' ' ~ • ~ , , ~ , • . i • . , . . ,1, • , • • ~ , . ti"., r,-; T.,( 'Ii il ~ ry I J ~ . . .S STATE OF WASHIN(}TON,l ~ County oP Spokane. J ~ . . ~ . , 4n th1e...........gth ......................day of............ .J.......... .llZy ~ A, D. 19... 63..., befure me person'al)Y aDPeared • all.d...GRAU. _S~L~..........pereonally known to , me , to be the.........InC.V~.dLlaZg . +................'........""""""""""""""""'who exe°uted the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that' : the eaid instrument to be the free and voluntary aet and deed oP saia..............Individual s for the ~ uses and purpoaes herein menttoued, and on oath each atated that...........theX.,.a.rE authorized to execute this . inatrument and that seal afflxed la the ............................................seal of said............nOt1~'y . Wherevf I have hereunto aet my hand and aIDxed my offlcial eeal the day and Yottr flrst above wrltten. , b~ . . . . , ~~`,~,~4.a,~.►~~;,, . . ' '`t,,S~ :~:~I ~~A1 ' J" . . J~e ~ 9:~ - Notary Public ~~W-~ M•~~ ' ' In and for the State f Wa gton, 06 ' V3~A7 residing a , t............ . . . :~a. , . . . . . . 0 U) E W' 1l11 1 ~ p ~ ~ C) A i: ~ 'p ,K N ~ ~ a Dd . ~ r' n ~ . ~ . (D 4 y d m i- t'- ' o d o , , ` ~~1~ti~~►~ M` ~ G0rr, • r. n k m ti U! ~ v ~ ~p O . o r. k x Ci~ )4jO O~; ' ~ ? ~ ~•q ~j ~ , M ~ ~ p ~i . . y A ~ ~ r• ~''r?; m ~ ~1° y ~ C+ 04 0 ~ ~ Q ~ ~ •y ~ ~ i R~ G ro ~ z c, ~ m N N w ~ ° co %I.-u 0 ~ \ , CL b 0 Q . _ . . . . ~ . . ~ . ' - , . • ~ ~ ~ _I . y . . , - ~ . , F L A T o~a• no• le • acec~ FileA Apr, Y6, l~3 , At 11:01 ,y~v. 'i R9~. J~ JI.G4iBOflkQ 1 I k.1dE~~ T. +?3.OV!~R GoRmCg xudlscr I EF E.Pp:1e ~ , _ ~u~:ao•: n~pYS; D E [~~'~ATIIDN Q. - ~ r.~F~ - - - N ~ R,4 A V,E ~ ' 77v! aoak Ra. 2 PnM 4T ~ •~n ~p ~ - ' ~lot Ct. 1~21 x - . ~5" ~ - ~ , • ExrstiRg6 N~lhf~tn '°-•3T4=•• - ' - 38Q'.. . ~ ~ I I~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Lf - q T~y -y~p/~ ~T LJ~ • .,~,~*r a c'9Si1' I: ISN~W AI.L MEN BY ~HESE PRESFI~TS thnt J. A. IHoseanNo ortd Evei~n M Masennko houe lald afl ~nd ' ~ - • . . ise~ a6' a4' ea ao' e0` eo' piqtlad inlq InlS, bf2Ch5 ond 61reaIB Iha lond shu~rn upon rhi~ muq fo 6e knoxn os PAR1S-NORq g~yg- DI41SI4N~,4 plat GI B16el~ 3, 5pnla Rase P4r~k, in tha &~ulh pnd-~pl~ ~ 5 112~ ol Seciion 7, T,~~~ ~ R.94~, W.~1. 5 4k0+~e Caun9 ~la6Ain 1 IE EpT 1 I !6 . p p~n ~ C he Sculh 109 leef of iha West i66.5 fee~ , ' rn ~ rn I ~ Iht~B01~~ ~rid 1tIIQy da AOP~by dgdi~ntg Ip ing PUbli~ 49 hi0h~a0yS 1~g g~~g~t9 u~ ~Qp6$ showi~ p~} o ~ Ihis map 4 2 I ~I 4 3 2 I ao~ ~ 30~ , , ~ g ~ . , _ a _ , ~ t~ • ~ A~I loi~ shull de r~~ider~tial, No etrucrure gAa1k ~ ertsted, oltered, p1a~~A m I perrrfftted io ramoin , n ~ , i OA OnY P~rli~n ~ Ihi9 ?rQ~t ~!hqr Ihen ~ 6~nqIE 9r p Mq191R18 fam~ly dw~INnp, privtli~ gpraq~ Ond Of{~9r ~ ~ " ~A ; r. ~ ~ - ~ ' R' ~ ~ ~ oulbu9ld~egs which moy 4e ~nci~antql tp 1he rssldenlfal nse o1 Ihe iand. ; , ~ - . ~ . . ~ ~ - ~ eo" -,a . ° ao' ~a' ~ ~ s~' eo' sa' an' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ i64~ ' " ~ n l8a ~4C Nan9 hul n6~ buildi`ng~ 4h011 be p14C~C~ upce ern! let. ~ o i•~ Iw, ~4C~ .C • ~ . ~ ~ a~ 4 ~ ~ ~ m . I.' ~ Y ~ ~I V q r~ Np dw~ l ling hpving o Heqr spote ~ f IesS I Ban 9 0 p Squar~ fee t s ha l ~ be perm i t le d an any 1a 1, a~ u ~ j c~ y ~ m L ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ Is~' o-l~ " ~ ~ QI s r . , v ap e 7'~e teregoing ~augr~ql8 und limif~llon5 of usa pro mpd~ lar 1Ae prplesrfon o! eoeh uf fh~ ~of e+rnare . ~ 16g ~ q~' _ ~~o' i6o' i ~ m gQ~~ 'PAAK-NORp guB4luiS~Qn" ~ould any~ one or merQ ai ~hese covenanls or IEmitaticn8 of v°y ~ ~ ~+ae 4a 6reoahed hy ong lat 4wr~r~ or pIY~ par5a~, Ihe~ onx orta nr more Ihp 4~hl~ ~wnera qf lar3 a or prapeRy~ in sflid "pARH-Id4RA $UBpIU~510N" m~y p~foreu 1he euld e~uenonis ond iimifafians ~ e ;d~,~` w _ a ~4 ' ~+Se in ~n mGnnaf ~ ~ ~ ~o Fl ~ ~ m ~ f ~ 1 Y 7~y~dld Qp IGw Mr hia own 6enelil Cr lor fhe beng~i} af ar17 a all ofner aMnerB ~ a & d ~ 1 0 0 4 8 u~ pFaF+B~Y~ IA fhB Su~~iYls14~. - o w 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ 186,5~ i~4.' ~ 180' ~8ry' A UC~JUJ'~TA A VG Eceeuted oi S o-herr~ Washin 9n Ihis~ af A il 1953 ° S ~ . ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~r $ Jould LYw ~]od S ~ , ~ea°~a` e ~z~,ao' aq N ~ ` 4 '~►r~ ~7~.,~.~.~ , ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 3 I ~ac~~ow~~n~E~I~IVT i - . ~a' 9s STATf OF WASHIIVGTONI , SS • GOU~tTY OF SP~Y4ANE ~ , , • : 4n Ihis 1r~ day af Ap~il 1993 bef~r$ rne parBpnolly J. A. h~aseanko ond EvElyn M. Mpggpnkq 4q m0 0 ~ ~ , . &newn to he fhe idsntic~l p4r~w ~ho e~e~u~ed Ihe wi~hin an4 faregainp inBtrumpnf eed acknawladged eai9 , I ~~s1rurneat fo De thei~ ~rea ond NDIYBtflFy d~Bd hX ~ha usee ond purpa~~~ here+n menlioned, , I IM WITPJES9 Wl1ERE~, 1 f~ve hereunl4 5~~ my h~dnd or~ ~ii'~Red mY i~iol SppE t~ dpy ~if8} c~ove rnitfed, C! "'qZ4~~ ~J~~~_~~1~ ~ I - Mp Earnmi99i4n e~i~9~1CP~'~''~ , i : a,• i'rc ~ • - ,.thPT Nafory P'udia in md tor ih~ SPola ai 1~asMinqton tesiding of i ~ ~ : ~ .r ~ ~ p~~ti`~•, ~r` ! , ENGI~IEER'S G~RTlFIGA~~ , T~s.sr~, ` MIS510N A VE. ~ CI~ E. Simpson~ o lisen~ed Civ11 Enqineer and Lcu~tl 5urreyer, hereby terl~iy ihn} fA~~ Rbt r¢preed~TS u trua seDY °n ~ d r~e ~fl+avi rec~rea ond wr4 nsa~a 6 ma an r~mi m ~7' K , G S 161 tOfflp~9 0~ m914qC1eTE18 IlOYE b6Bn ~0~. . _ ~ _ ,o..` ~ ,i'' ~..~s-Lrt ' *r ~ l y ' I " , e~~`y ti, ~ ~~y ~.ti I hareb~ ~erti{y fhflr Itre requirard tqxee fln IbB Eif~ p101iRd Ipn~ m0Y9 peen puid, <<~_ - ~~rs ~pa,~ , I953 a. By ~ r. . , 3 I ; . ~ . 5pp ~ Counly Trea~rei a; ~ > r ~ '~f,'~e~ o R 'ir `'9~.~x++U3 ~'~~F~~A L~GEhID Eenmined end dpproMed ~ i a 5et 1rOn Pipe ~ [}~le A~rr f.~ ~95~! 5pakane ~ ~ouniy er ~ Ser Alpnumeni ' Found hlonument L,~YITUQ~~a ~ dEP~l,~~~JJQ~j - Boundcrp at 5ahdivided Land Etisiin~ +Nofer IAOin EKpmined ohd Apprwed~ poie ,~rzC.'i/! 9 _ p r Spa~anQ ~aunty P~Qnning Comm~~eion By ./~~~`r GOUR9F p15TANGE N RT ropass4 Wate Mni~ 0 H SDl1TN EAST N}~ST ~ huirman NORTH ~99.g4' 29454~ ~ FINAL PLAT 598°52'W 726,Otl 14.36' 725,95' 5 8°41'E 300,U4' 30a.4d .4~' - N$$~E 726.Qp` 1~.78' ~ 725.84' ~ E~cmir~d orrd ApprWed~ pore ,1953 - - ~~~SK)N 354.2~' ~14 36' 725.93' 725,95' ~ u I ' Spaloone flaunfg mie~~r Fca~,B1 ,~r~ pifi b OQ` 4.tiB~ ~ S UBDf111SION (3F PARTD`= O LOIJK 3i 71-1FV~~ ~OSA ~ ~ Choir~no f ~ i P ~ ~ PAft PAR ~POKt'4' YE GOUIY 1 I • A M q° ~ • ~ 9 . s ~ u ' ~ , YY14SHJIVVTVN , 5cole~ I"=50 } '~e , SGale: I4=50' ClorenCe E. Sirnpson . April, 19~4 April, 1353 Prafessicnal Engineer I ~ r j ~ ~ . „ ~ . . . . - ' . , , _ • . , - . " . . . ~ . ' , * i . . . . _ , , - , . . . _ _ _ , , , , K ;i' ' • . ~ ~ , ' . . • ' ~ ~ . ~•r' . . , ~ . • .a , „ , r - ~ . s ~ • ~ ~ - ~ , a1 ~ar . ~n y • td~ ' Ja , , rx~ ~ . ' s` - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ , ~ ' . ~ ' , , ' ' ' , . . , ' , ~ . . , ~ - ' ' ~ ~ 0 7$ ~5~7~ . ~ . _ , . - ~ . ~ . . ~ . . -___._a... ~ . , . ~ . , , , T - ~ . + . ~ . ~ l • ' y . . ; ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ..s . . . : - . , _ p . . , . . q , _ . , ~ , , . ~ ~ # ~ ~ o ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ • ~1 y, ~1~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~1~ , ~ 5 ~ . ~ , . , . . ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~x . ~ a . ; ~ . , ~ ~ ~ . ~~~;u~ ~ t ~ . 4, fi i ~ ~ • ~ ° ~ ~ , ~ . ~ • , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~j ~ . ~ . , ~ ~ ,'I .4 . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ► ~ ~ •d . , . . . ~ ~ t . 4 ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ , . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . e ~ ~ , , . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ► . ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ' ~ d ~ d g~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • 4 , $u d . ~ y~ ~ t, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° 4~ ~7 q ~ ~ . ~ a ~ ti m . ~ ~ . . , , ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U . ~ 4 , t ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ h ~ . ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ► ~C . (~1 t ~ . `4, - f~ 4 . 6 ~ , ~ . ~ . ~ . . ~ , ~ Y ~ r ~ ~ - , ~ ~ . . N ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ~ t r ~ ~ • , , • P ' 2 . ~ ~ I ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~S ~ i - ~ ~ 3 , . 1T. , . ` 4 ~ • . ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ r ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ % } y ~ ~ . q ~ i~Y ~ . ' ~ , ! • ~ . ~ 1~ ~ * , ' ~ ~ 1 1 ~ i ~ ° ~ . ~ ~ . , . . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ► ' r ~ , ~ • 4 y ~ . ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ d ~ . , . ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ a - . ~ qi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . g . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ a t ~ . , ~ , t~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ~ k ~ - F . ; . ~ w ~ ~ ~ . . - ~ ~ ~ e , ~ • ~ , , ~ ' ~ ~ , o~ ~ ~ , . . t`~ , ~ , ~ ~ . ~ ~ , '1 ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ . , . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ y , , . ~j 4~ . ~ ~i t ~ i, ~ ~ ~ ~i•i u ; ~ , ~ Y ~ ~ . . ~ E . c ~ ~y*~ . ~ ~ . t , . , ' ' , i/ ~ li• . ~ . ~ ~ 3 ~ , ~ ~ • ' q ~ . t .i ~ • I ~ h ` 1 Y y ~ . . . . __h. .,.,d.~.~-.~ j . _ ~ r~ _ . . • ' - - , I 1 ~ ~~e &GINEER'S REVWW SH, E'~ ~ate As Buil,t Flans Received Dar~ ~lans Appra-vea PLATFILE # PE4g~g -97 New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar Companion FIe ZE-0054-97 Hearing Date: 12/03/1997 H Time: 10:30 H Number: 2 Relaced File P-1780 "Cechnical Review Date: 09/25/1997 TR Time: 01:15, Building TDept Revaew Date: R Time: R Number; TECH REVIEW # Date Received. 09/16I1997 lte:v~iew Type: L,arge Lot ❑ Bldg. Square fieet: N4. Lot 17 No. Acre 3.7 Pr0j8c~ Name: B1~~EY HEIGHTS Rmge-Townshi~-s~ctiart: a~* 2,5 - 7 S1te AC~~reSS: N WSS'ION/W CENTE iPARK PA1,tCEL(S"): (first 20) Applicant, Name: DAVID EVANS ASS4C-K0NEN, J4HN Phone (509) 327-$697 54073.0505 Ap,plican~t Addre-ss: 110 W GATAT.I)0 PhQne 2# SPOKANII, WA 99201 • o~liC~ow ~v1ailed. a R1QQd Zone `Water 4 Sewer 5 School Fire J Phone I1SWI~S'~ Bi11ing Owner: MAHAR, JIM Engineer KERREL BELL Address: Address p0 OX 8512 Company DA~7 EV~'S &ASS4C ~tC ~sP~x,A.rhE, ~A 99202 Address: 110 W ~TALDQ AvE SPQKANE WA 99201 Phone: Ph4ne: (549) 891-8837 Fhane: {509} 327-8697 Fax: (509) 327-7345 Signed Natne Building # 456=3,675 Plaeinine # 456-2205 Contact: 'I`A[v0lY YONM ~ fir~inhmi~prli ~ i)acerinfin~ ITfnifiakj 09I2511997 DATE TECMUCALLY CQNTLETE DA~~ ~~OT TEGHNTCALLY COMP14E1 E i DATE ~AY ~~S REGEIVED DA'~E PRIORITY FEIBS RECEIVED C4PY TQ ACCQ'UNTING ~ F I!AL PLAT FBIES GQMPLET ED ANI7 COPY T0 ACCaU-NTrNG I ~ . , ~ - ~ NOTICE TO P ~ BLIC / NOTiCF, T~ ~~LIG # 1 3 4 6 ~~MiPLETED - ~~S T~ ~~~~NED1 ~ ~~c~t A~1~"~,`~ /~j ~~•dut ~/L~' in-Qut 113 DESIGNN DEVIATION DATIES D1-OUT ln-Oue #4 In-Ouc #3 In-Oui #6 , ~ l BQND Q[JANTITIES F0~ ~RAI-NAG"1 I'"E' ~~~ULATED DATE BOND RECEIVE17 BOND AMOLINT REGEIVED 1), -L/.V.3 ,r DATE BOND RELEA,SE - DAfiE BQND REnCT~ED B0ND BALANCE I-T'earing 17ate TSecisiop A.pproved t.r Denied Condnwed Appealed BGC Appcaved DeWad A-gpealed to Court Appcoved Detfmd ConCmuec~ Final Projece Status S?'AMPED MYLARS T(~ ~ERNff T, ECHNICL&N {SYL} ~I S'TAWM 20$ LQT PLAN5 ~~~~~RETt~~ (SANDY) ~ ~ q Iq'~ fi 71~ ~ ~ 6 ~ 1~'~'t~ 6r4., ~ ~ - 4 +Ot~ ~~~~~OY6 &~D'` ~ +~i ~'d~.~ ~ qJ"4Afi&b x~ ~ -kr.) ~ to - , Canceled File ENGINi'ER' SREVIEW SHEE'T' Date T''led - - Date As-B-rilt Plans 12eceived - - Date Roazl Pla-m Approvetl TR PLAT ~FILE # PE4L74'V -97 New Road Standards 5-15-95 3vlylar CompaniQn, Fi1e ZE=0054-97 Related File Heari-ng Date: H Time: H Nurober: TechnicaL Review Date: 09/2511997 TR Tbne: 01:15 Buildang Dept TECH REV~W # Revi~w Date: It Ti.me: R Number: Date Receivetl,: 09/16l1997 Review Type: Large Ii.ot ❑ $ldg. Squ-are Feet: Ne. Lots: 17 No. Acres: 3.7 PrOject NaIlle: BRADTEY'HEYGrHTS Range-Tawnship--Secd6n: 44-25=7 slte Addr@ss: N MISSIQN/W ~~NTERlE PARK, , PARCEL(S): (first 20) App1ican~ ~ame: I)NVID ~VAN5 AS$OGKONEN„ JOH-N Phone (509) 327-$697 W AppJicant Address: 110W CATAL,DO Phone 2# ~~1 SP()KANE, WA 99201 Date Conditions, Mailed: FIoQd Zone: No Water Source: 4 Sewer Source: 5_ Schaal Dist: 363 Fire Dist: I Phone DisC: US W&ST B;iLling Name: Owner: MAHAR, JIM 'ngineer: KER-REL BELL Address: Owner Address: PQ 13OX, 8512 Com_gany: DAVm EVAI~~& ASSOC '!-NC SPOICANE, WA 99202 t1dtlreSs: 110 WCATA.LDQ AVS SPOKANE WA 99241 Phone: Owner Phone: (509) $91-8837 Pbone; (509) 327 $697 Fax: (549) 327 7345 Signed Name Bui.ld_ing # 456-3675 /Plarnh~g # 456-2205 Contact: TAMMY JONES ~ate Subm'itted pescrjption waals ~I 9 - 2-3r'-9 7 DA~E TECH-MCAL~LY COMPLETIR I7ATE N0'T 'I'ECHIVICALLY COMPLETE DATE PAY FEES RECEIVED DATE PRIORITY FEE5 RE-GEIVED COPX T0 AGCOUNTING ~JNAL ~~T FEE-s CoMPLBTED ArrD COPY TQ AccQUvTING ~ l / IS~~~~E TQ PUB_LTG / NC)TTCE TO PLTBLIG # 1 3 4 6 ~OMPLETED - OR _NEEDS T(~ ~~GNED In-Ouc ft1 In-Out N2 ln-Out N3 DESIGN DEVIATIQN DA~~S IN-OL)T ln-Out #4 !n-Out #5 In-Out 1f6 1 7 ~OND QUANnTMS F0R D~.2.AIN-AC~~ ITEM CALCULATET? ~ N DAT-E BOND RECEIVED BQND AMOliVT RECEIV13D DA'~E B4ND RE-LEASE - DATE $ONl7 REDUCED ~ON-D BALANCE 'Rear.ing Date.laecision Approved J?enied Continued Appealetl $CC Appraved Denied t\ppeal'ed tp Court A,pprQved Dertied Continued Final Pr,oject Status STAMPLD MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNIGIAN (SYL) ST"AMPEb 20$ LOm PLANS TO SECRE-TARY (SA:NDY) , ,r - - ' - ~ . ~ R- ~Q1ra~s- ~ FoR DEs~iGN ~'rVi.~T~or~ , - . - - _ '$30.00 ~ . ~ _ . . DATE June 28, 1'999 R0AD MAME Edgexton Court R E--F CRP/RClS # - NAMf& OF R'LAT- , Bradley Heights 4 Ptat # ~'-~.898 ADDIUSS Or- $LI )G ' . . - 6011 ~i~M~ QF B~,DG 1~1~~OJ.~C~' - _ _ SLOG 4139-. •5ecCion 7 '['ownsbip 25 Ranb~ ~44 , F~DERALISTATE 1~~OJEGT# PROJ'EC`C' L[Ivl.GrtS Nora -to C.QS _ ~~~C~~ST[~1G C4N1~I''~;t~NS P,CttQ'I~QSED IMPROVEMENTS ROADVlnTH 9 0 ` , - 4 0' , . ROAt~ SV, iF~AC`~ AC1 - A~~P AVG. DAI0PI~t~.~F,[C . ` Current Traffic Count ` Desi ;n Year Traff c Count _ PROJECfi OESCRIPTrQN T his. plat wxa.l extend Ed~exto«_ to the sQ+uth wit'h a SPokane CQurtty ~~~nd~rd,_ i-ull cul de sao. ' . , . , PR(aPQSED_DESa;GN DEVIATIO1V Pl.ace 5' ~ement c9ncrete si d~e7walk- da.rect1y behind cQ,r,6; . ins,tead,of 7' benind Cuj:b,. ~ . C . . { -JUMirI Q;A 1, 1:0 N T,he layout o£ the lots in the cu1 de _sac 'ina?ces eontiguous sideiaalk-Pet- - ~er cnO.~ce in this case. The fror~tages 4n ~~t-s -axeu n$r_,row - settin,g th~ ~i~kq~w,pa`lk awisiy f ro_►~ 'tnwoul~ ~~rve 't4 exacerbate t~e f~~~l~ing of Conf inement in the 'cuj•"~~k . S:aQ: sidewa"lk on. Eckge,rto'n, Court tfl the th:erefore, the new sicie°w4l'1'~ . , . c~'oet matcYa a specif~.ed location. D~'a`n .a6~' frQm the cul ~1~ w~.~l ~b~ i'~°~ --~~~e d.~V~►(04 r iv'h'~ sid*walk to swales loc~~ed betiihd t;~~ sidewalk. SU$NijtT%-'BYF . ~~vi d Evan.s and As'sociates, Inc: DA~'it- . June, 28, 19~9 ~~DM,-,~• Weit -110 Cataldo, Spokane,. Washingt'fln Z1P CODE 9921 0 1 PIj 0 NE # ' ~ta9) 327-8597 . ' . ' *,***,ADM1NI~ST{,~.1'IVE VAR1ANCt FFE 0F $34:00 .1 A11J' lO SP(?KANE C(aUNTY**** ' - . 1026WEST- BROADWAY, SPOKME, WASH ~G- TON9~2 0, l70PR'ONC,(SQ9)456-3640 FAX (509) 3,24-3478 -REQC11;,ST W[C.li, NO'" E " WITElOt1T FUNDS- C~,s;i4i~~~ECK g EcEIvED Bv Da~~ 3-~~Y ~ . , . lC/FORMSYQ9SDSV.frm - , ` . • ,:r. .r . .:s5 T ,3~:' ' r..._ . . t~' - . ' " - " - '_,i~~. . . . e . ~ DESIGN DEVIAT.~~ON ~ . - ~ STAFF ;It,91CQKMENUATIONS ~'~~r►~a ; ~ ~Q~►~~ ~c.-~,. . . , . . . , ' . . 4 ' . ~ . ~ . . t:ai~r~• ~ - ~ , ~ . , . ~ ' . ~ - ' i - _ " ~ . •P . ~ ~ ~ Appro.vedi,-'- Approved w/cbnditions N6t Approved • ' ~ - ~ ~ , . , . . ~ _ . ~ Project Manager pate . , Zl4~~ ~~4wvr,> A-P o uvA'L-- • • ,Ap-r = ved ~~1.;pproved w/conditions Not Approved ~ , • , : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ " ~ } ~ ) . • ~ . „ t .t . Praject ]vCanageme4lt Enginee~ing wte • . , _ . y . A►pp.roved Approved wlcondili,ons Nat Approved Operations Manager Dat~~ ~ S- P 0,',K-'AN.C, C-b`If N'1':EN C, [NE ER'$ =UE TtR,MINA T1:4N: . . . : , . ' . . . . ° - ' , • . , . ~ - , - . . . ~ y . . . ~ ~ ~ I ✓ ~ Ap rov-ed Approved vvlcon,ditians Not Approved ~ ' • . ~ ~ . S okane County Engineer , - ~ Date . ` . K/FORMS/DESDF-V.frm ~ ' ~ _'~r.' ~ - • _ ~E ~_,ST FOR D~E,SIG~_: D~E"~I`~1 S30:oo~ 21 . DATE J"une 28,, 199,9 ' ~_R.QAD ~I~'AME Miss ion Ave:nue, ~ - CRP/RID,# ' 'F_PI~~T' Bradl.e,~ ~~ight s ' . Plat # P-18 4 8 "AQDWESS C1F K.DG - ~ , ~Alvft 'DG PPpJECT ~ BLDG #89 ~ - ~ ' - ~Section 7" Township 25 Range,' 9 4, . . . . . . ~F5IRAVST'ATEP:R4J'8CT rPR0~3~CTZ,IM,I'TS , Park to Center ~ ~E-XIST1NG C0NDIT10INS. PROPO5ED IMAItOVEMENTS ROAD W IDTH 12 ' ~ . . 210" R4AJD .Sl!'.RPACE ' pCP .ACP A'~'lG, I)AILY TRAFF1C 2000 2000 ~ - CurJ:ent ~'raffilcfCount ~()esign Year '1'r•aft Count ~ PI~~09~~~'~;,~SCj [~''~'1;O~N Cu~r_ren.t~~.y,' Missio~c~ zenue_ has~ ,a ,2~4~wide pav~d swr-face with no cu_b r 1or pea l:'k. Xn, conGt~;o.n w.~~~.h t~c- . plat,~ ,,t~ie- zpadi w~ll be brc~u~gh~ to Coll~ec,'tor . , - - , ; . - A~rt~ecial sdaxd,;, with. ot A-CP; cq_:qb. 4~nd . gutt'5idewalk, and ctrainage swale,s ~i~a ~the. north, . h~,~,l of t kie road. . ~ . . - . , . a _ . . - PROP~OS~Y7:'~f'f~~lG~~V D~V1~1"T'~ON' _Construc~t 6~3' T~ipe~ H~ b~` ~.'nc~` gutter at a l.ongit~,dina:l slope .,o-ft0 0,, 9.7%,- _.below the Co.unt;Ystar~cla,~.~, of'~.0. . . ~ ~ > , . . _ . , ' ~Jy'3 3~.' Y _ : _ , ~ . JU-S'~I ,~,IC~A-7 1 ~r,~,~T1 ~Skanc Coun~ty repa ve~d ~)i~s~ road in- 1:997 fol~~ow~.ng co,x~struct~.on o,f, t~~ , C ~hown o~i~t~he . ~ _ a,tt a.ch~d .grade^~shEe?t;; cross-slopes are consis_t-= . ~ 1{ . ' - _ ~..~ri~ ~n b'ut~_~;he lon.gituc~in~~ ~rade:, on t e ~ ~of cav~?ment var•i.es 'f,om _ y. . . _ - q9 - ' a?~_ - - 71W _ . 0'. 'he.-.0". 49~$ to dr 9,7% c.u,rb ~~~ades q o,r`r=,,e~spo~?c~ the . arcias where t h,,"?edc~~ - o~ ~n~t~.y ~0 03.$ ~,q 0 . ~2~~,~. . P~oposed , cr,o~ssopes on, the su~standard cuNtYA~oi~ ~:;.08$ ta _5:00~~.; 'tMe st~e:p~X cro~s-slopw,~l~. aid i~n qetting runo~f . . - ~Q`. _ ~nequi.ckert ~'wo T.~Pe- e'~'s ~wiT~~~ ~be, co t ~ ' . i n ~his p oil ding in the gutLer- anci toadwa.y ' Y • _ _ ~ - A~ ' . ~ i i . ~ • ' , ~ _ _ ~ . ~ i:.rs-.i~. , . ~ ` _ . _ . . • , - , ' ' ~ Y . , _ r . , . . " , . . [~'..r . ! _ _ ' _ ~ ' _ . . , ~ - - ~ - , ~ ~ . - ' ' • yryi - ` - _ , ' . ~ - , , ~ . . ~ • • . . . . , ~ , r Q ~ i _ , . ~ ~ - . . . . . • " . , ♦ . . F . . , r " _ ~ t " ~SU~Nt~~ C~_B,sSC: Da~iid~ 81vans°, and As"soe~i.:atp s,, Inc 'D,A'Tf- June 28, 19,99 ~ ~1_~;D~-SS''.st ` lU. cat.a~l~o, 5~pci;k.an~~, , Was~h'g~to~r~ , . , Z, 1PC6h)E` . ,9;92'-, o ~ • . _ ~ . ,P~aWE-- `W' "(;'550'9)`.. 32,7=8697 . Z . ~ . ' . ~ _ ^ _ 4 . _ . . . . ' _ . . , ~ . ~ •1 , ; I ' AD ;MINI~~'kA~'IV~.~%'A►R~I~I~NCE ~~0F O~.Ob'PA~ ~ ]',k ~1CA`~J CQ~ UN Y . _.<i~0,2b VJ,~S'~ BROADWA,Y, $1'QKANEt 1,A>~1f[~,,N~~~;0, ~1 6Q'g,' ~ ($0'9)i"4.5b=3600 FAX (509) 324-3478 ~ ~ _ . . . ~~-REQLIEST ti)'JflLL NOTEW A."~ ~UT FIYNDS- f ~ . . . _ - r - g - - S~;(~G~N~K ~ # REChIVED ~3Y D,q,T~ - , ~ - . - . - ~ ~ . 'KJF0RlV1sr0F-_~s1DEV:fm, _ . .y.. . , ~ . . ♦ r. \ DESIGN flEV[ATICIPJ ' STAFF RECUMMENDATIdNS ~ ~`~,~-£ir'►7r'~'t't~?+ ~ ~f~-0t! itr.r Approved Approved wlconditions Not Approved (V5, ~ Praject Manager Date ed Appcoved wlconditions Not Appraved v At { Proj ct Management Eng(neering '/Date Approved Approved w/canditions Not Approved ~ ;W Operatiafis Mdhager Date SPOKANE CUUNTY E[YGINEER'5 DETERMINATI4N: pp ved Approved w/conditians Not Approved . ~ .J ~ Spokane County En&r er l ~ Date KlFORMSlDESDEV.frm - - ~ . . DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, T R A N S M I T T A L West uo Cataido ro: Bill Hemmings, P. E. spokaM, WaShington. 99201 Spokane County Engineers 1026 W. Broadway Tel: 509327'8697 Spokane, WA 99260 Faac: 509327•T.345 DATE: July 13, 1999 FROnn: Doug Busko, P. E. PROJECT: Bradley Heights, P-1848 PROJ. MAHA0005 ITEM COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 7/13/99 Design Deviation Applications 2 2 7/13/99 Plan and Profile Sheet 3 1 7/13/99 $60.00 Check 4 1 6/25/99 Grade Sheet for Mission Avenue ~ i ❑ AS YOU REQUESTED ~ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ DOCUMENT CONTROL ' ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ❑ FOR YOUR REVIEW ❑ COMMENTS: Bill, . Here are the two Design Deviations we discussed at the Pre-Design meeting last month, one for the sidewalk and one for the curb grade. A full plan set should be down to the County within the next week or so. Please call if you have any questions. Thanks, ~ Doug B. ~ . I • . Pi-qfessioiicils • g Qiiality ''I ~ r / • 4316 ` > DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. - WEST 110 CATALDO 509-327-8697 . SPOKANE, WA 99201 91-119 ~ ~1221(1) _ - ~ 'DATF . • . ~ PAY TOTHE 6 ~ ~~/L/~ ~ - . . . „ ~ . - ~ - - ~ .-`••F_ ~ + a ORDER OF n r DOLLARS - ELLS FARGO BANK 4 ~ ? - . - YVEST 524 RIVERSIDE, SPOKANE, WA 99201 ' . • . - , ' _ - . - - ~ _ - _ ` ~ . - - - P5~ ym~' NP FOR ~ . ii'0043L6ii• :1:12210 L190:0218 777 795il' _ _ . . , . _ _ . . ~ . . ' . , • ` . " - .°l . . - .c ,.r-~a• - . , : . , • . ' ' . . ' : ~ • • . . ' . • - • ~ , ` •'v., . . • . - ' , • • . . ' • . . - • - . . _ . . ~ • ' . - • , . . ` ~ _t~y " _ ..or. • _ . . . ~ . _ ' . . . ~ ~ • . ' • . ' . ' - - : r : . ~ • - • - . . • • 'T: . . . . . , . . • • . . ' ~ ~ . ^ • r 4 • • ~r ' ~ - . . , ' • _ . ' . . • . ' • • . ` ` _ ' ' . 'Y a ' ~ ~ .o: . • • ; _ , . • • . ' ' ' ' Received From: Receipt No. 107465 . Address: Date: 7-/J L7 Amount Paid: NO? Z Acct. No.. ~ Cash: ❑ ; , _ Sales Tax. O V Amt. of Acct: _ Money Order: Total Paid z Amt. Paid VV ,C~: ~ ~ ~ w~e Y . Balance Due• te~. ~Cre a J ~3 • .f ~ ~ ~O~ ~ i . R': r ` 3~ • V~ Purpos ~ _ ~ - • ' Received bY: . ~ Received From:i Receipt No. 122307 Address: Date: _ ~ 51-t~~'~) Ul.)A : ✓ _ , Amount Paid: - ~ Z Acct. No.: ~ . . Cash: ~ . : ~ : ; _ Sales Tax: V Amt. of Acct: ~ Money Ordeck-E] 1~. ~ , ~ t~ Total Paid i - ~ ~ • ~ t f,~~~ ~ ~ ` Z Amt. Paid / ~ y -Checlc. CtieckZ#~ Y Bal ~ ance Due: a e~`' : 0 l .~Credit Car ~„iGa~j, , ~a.~s~7v-. . c ~~]►f~.~l : ~ ~'F' ~ r jli ~ Purpose. F&VAL / , ' • ' ' ' , Receiveti by: ~ . - . . . ~ _ . . . - ♦ a . . . . . ~ . ~ . ~ • f ` ~ ~ . y ~ . r . ~ ~ . ~ • ~ s Y~ I~_ ~ .~a . 09851 JIM MAHAR HOMES INC. WASHINGTON TRUST BANK 8121 E. MARINGO 509-879-3495 SPOKANE. WA SPOKANE, WA 89212 28-8h251 ~ 2/10/00 PAYTOTHE SQokane Couniv En2iaeer's Oflice ORDER OF s *z100.00 . One Hundred and 00/100~t********~***~****'~******~*~**~*t*~***~~*~*******~*****tx*~* D011ARS Spokane County Engineer's Offlice 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 ~ MEMO C ~ Rm mmffits-Attentrow--DX0Q- qUrS~ RE F UP C! • 1: 12 5 10008 91: 100 2 3 1 ?88 Lii' 98 5 L • , o SECURITY FEATURES INCLUDED. DETAILS ON BQCK. o - . ~ ' . . . : ~ : • - . . . _ _ ' ' , - . • ' • . : . ~ . . - , - ~ : . Received From:_ ~~,~R "totA Receipt No. 122307 Address: 8 ~h Date: f'G 9 wA Amount Paid: / ~ , Z Acct. No.: , Cash: Sales Tax: o ~pa V Amt. of Acct: Money Order:; 0 sf . ~ Totai Paid io71 W co Z Amt. Paid = CFieck: D~~Check,# Balance Due: p ~--•,Cre~it~C,~arci: QEzp._Date:~ ' ~ Purpose: ~ -'~..~s~i~,'~ Q ~ ~L . r~/a-I= ~ Received by: ~ - - JIM MAHAR HOMES INC. WASHINGTON TAUST BANK 09851 • 8121 E. MARINGO 509-879-3495 SPOKANE, WA SPOKANE, WA 99212 28-8/1251 ~ 2/10/00 PAYTOTHE S a~ne Countv Engineer's Office ORDEA OF Q . ~ 1 OO.OO One Hundred and oouARs Spokane County Engineer's UfTice ~ 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, Wa. 99260 . MEMO • - ~ . ` ' ~ C! Ar"" SI AE 1: L 2 5 10008 91: 100 2 3 1788 1ii' 98 5 L • ~ S SECURITY FEATURES INCLUOED. DETAILS ON BQCK. o : _ . - . : . . . • . . , , ' " • . ' • • • ' - - " , ' ' • ' ' • . - - • - . ' • . ' . . , , _ , - . . : - . • , . . . . , . , • . . - . , . ' , , • , . • . , • , , . , , • , 1aIvisioN Or• r:,NC:iNrsFItINC,: AN11 ROADS • n Divisim c,rTirr 1'um.ir1 tvonKS Dr:i'nii'rmr:Nr - , lNilllam A. Jcilins, I'.F... Co»inty I'soiginerr , f)r.iit►ia K(. !::colt, ('.f's.. I)Ireclor ' ~ A(.iI~.a!;~~11~iR+,N'~' ''U .I.'11~' ~X~ I!;1~,►5 ENGINrr[i~-S ArRE~~~MENT NUMISErt /;2'''~~~5 . J . . - '1'his '181-ceiiicilt bclwccil Spokanc Comn(y mncl i~nn~~1f s~rsm~ , MA~ AT-k_---- _ wliose iiiteresi,1Ilie ~~~i-ujec,l is ~ . +t~, . . . i5 enlered-Inlo tlii5 clay 0 f s~+~.~1E - , 19 ''I~is agrecn~eiil is alr1~lical~lc lo Ilie rr~~jecl. k now~i tis : Ae.'V-~i~' 1-'S I ~jt' ~ rc rtnnt -111~ t • . . . '1'hat tlic't,lll(I1VIdUiIIS :111d p11'I1CS 111111C1I IICI'C111 1S I1aV111g 111 IIlIC1'CSl iii II►e .il.~ovc clcscribecl prolierly or prc~ject agrec . , r 1'.. ,IlAcii'61btitse Spok.mie-Gt»itil.y for pro?jcct rcview ancl inspcction fcr,s as sI)ccificcl in Ch7rlcr 9.14 of _ . Fie~k~~ie Cc~~iiity- Cucle. 't'lie fees ~vill l~e l~~~sccl c~ii, acl,~iil salary cc~sts iiicurrecl tiy ,Src~katie ~ ,--a'°~ ° - - - : . ..Cc~~~i1~y~C~~r'rrcijec~ rEViewS ~ncl / or iiis~cctic~tis ~~-liis a Ien pc_rcent ~~cliT►ii~islr7live cl~arge, ;ttul will ' ns accriierl. Aiiy I,illieig mnoiiiils liie, iiiclucliri6 a►,►y expcnses i»ctirrecl in tlie 'Offleot~iiiiI od;~ii c~verilile 7cc;(lilnt, fntisl, he ~~;iicl ~~rie~r ici II'~ie .(~c~iacec~►I~i~ce ~f Ilie rre~.jcet fc~r s: Tf-a•`~)I'njGCI is ~~I,)lirc~vccl a»cUc~r filecl tivilll n~>~~I;~»cc slill c~~viii6, Ilic u11~~aicl I~hl~iice sli~ll l~c, ' i"cl"M(liiii 30 clays of the iiivoicc clalc. . , . ~ ~ - . , . ,l~;recs fli:il liicse fec~~ nre, c 7i~c1 ~,iayal~lc ii~~c~n recei~~t c~f Ilie I~illiiig as ,Sl~ccific,el ' , •~`'rr_ ''V•- I 1 clii 1 3. Aiiy=Aiivoices noC p7ici witliiti 30 clays of tlie iiivoicc clcilc will hc cc»>sidcrccl' clcli»c,liicnl. 1'f any' . r►tils_.fn,tlcliiig lial"lticc, orl ilie rccamit I'or tliis prpJcct is tiol pnic1 witlflit :30 clsiys of 41ic iirvclic:c cl.Ilc, . . , no, fiit:thor reviews of-the proje.cl cloeuuierit5 will, be colicltictecl tinlil Il'ic entire aceotitit halance 't5, ~ j~ai~l:~ An}► halance- oii tlie nccrn~tit ftir II►is ~~roj,ect iuot nnicl ~villiin GS ~lays c~f tlie iiivoice cl~te 'ir»y , restilt°- in, I,egal' -aclion or tlie iiiitialic»> of ollier collectioii proceclures, inclucliiis referral to ~ • - . cc,ill'eclion age»cy: I'he Spo»sor will he liablc. for any ailcl aI1 expcnses iiicurrecl hy tlic Couiiey fc~r1- llie 611'eciion of overclue accocinls. - , 4. 14Iie ilioiitlily billiiig sliuiil(l he scW Io Ilic aIIc»tioil of: . . , , ,N /1 ti1, E: ADDtzrss: /,Ov~U ~ . . . . ~ CI'CY, S't'A'm..: ~~U D~~'~-N~ l•f~I~'S ff ' , . T.iP C 0 1) r:: ~ ill IONrs -7~S . I.uiiclcrstarul Ihat failnre Ic~ Imy Ilicsc fceS inay .resull iii dchy i'ri c:omiitclion or approval cif Ilic projcr.1 c.►r,ollier pcissiblc s;iiictioils. ~ . ' , ~ 0 iF tliis fee agreEment is cc»iir(etecl by so»mentie ntlier 11l7n tlle .Simrisor (i.e., flie pro .ject owtier nr,-I , priiici~~at in (lie Ciriii sponsoring llie l,rojccl), sticli as tlle I:?riginccr clesigiiiiig llie liroject, Ilicii ' writle.ri authorizal'ion ft-or» tlic 5ponsor specificnll'y n>>(ligi•iziiig tlie Agenl to CXCCt1IG tiiis Fce Agrcciiicrii is attnchccl to tliis lfcc Agrc:cmcrit. _ . S l ON/l'"I' TO R - T3 y : ~ T.(PRiNT rrnMr> ~ ~ 13~'~~~u[iN Xidl;.~,c~,ti~~~U_1~~~~'~_U ~i~_ca~~1~N~;..c<~_l.jN~l'.Y ~~~N~,[NI~~?~t►~ ~ k1s1f1aFieefe'cAic 211/96 102_6 W At,c►adivuy Avc Spoicnuc 1N'R 99260-0171) (509) 456-:16110 I'AX: (5119) 324-3478 'fJ)I): (509) 324-316f ~ - , . - , . . T " y~, r~ t . . . , . • • , ' _ , . . . - LF' - • - h_ . 4:'[_~t ~.t . , 1' . . - ' _ • • ~ -_.~SC'~. A • ' . . t. . -~a~~~ REC ~ ~ ~ ~ , . MAR 0 e- lyye SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Sf'OKANECOUt, RE: Preliminary Plat of Bradley Heights, with a ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Zone Reclassification from Ul•ban Residential-3.5 ) CONCLUSIONS, (U1Z-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) ) AND DECISYON Applicant: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. ) File Nos. PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 ) 1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION Proposal: Applications for a preliminary plat to divide approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for single family residences anci for a zone reclassification from the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone to the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone. Decision: Approved, subject to conditions. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the applications for a preliminary plat and zone reclassification, and the evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions: A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc., 8121 East Maringo, Spokane, WA 99212 Address: Not known at tlus time. Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue and beriveen Center Road and Edgerton Road in the SW '/a of Section 7, Towclship 25 North, Range 44 EW-M, Spokane County, Washington. Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Comprehensive Plan Category: The subject property is designated within the Urban category of the Spolcane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. The property is also located within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA), Urban Impact Area and Aquifer Sensitive Area designated by the Comprehensive Plan. Environmental Revierv: A Detei-minltion of Nonsignificance was issued by the Division of Building and Planning on ~iovember 7, 1997. Site Description: The site is approximately 3.7 acres in size, flat in topography, and is vacant and undeveloped. ln 1995, a preliminary plat (File No. PE-1780-95) was approved for the site, comprised of 12 single-family lots in the UR-3.5 zone, at having a net density of 3.24 units ~ HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 1 ~ per acre. The site is located within thc Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA), with public transit available north of the site along Trent Avenue. The project is also located within the interim urban growth area boundaries designated by Spokane County ptusuant to the Washington State Growth Management Act. Surrounding Conditions: The property is located along the north side of Mission Avenue, which is designated by the County Arterial Road Plan as a Collector Arterial. Center Road, which lies along the east side of the site, is designated as a Local Access Road. Edgerton Road, a Local Access Street, cunently terminates fi-om the north along the northerly border of the site. Park Road, which is designated as a Principal Arterial, is located about 160 feet west of the site. Interstate 90 is located at varying distances south of the subject property. The surrounding neighborhood consists primarily of single-family residences on lots ranging from 8,500 sqiiare feet to 15,000 square feet in size. The southeast corner of Vlission Avenue and Center Road, which lies diagonally across from the site, is zoned Regional Business (B-3), and has signage for a fiiture hair salon. A 13-unit apartment complex and a home business are located immediately east of such vacant area. Single-family homes are located across from the site along the south side of Mission Avenue. A 5`''-grade only elementary school and grange hall are located west of Park Road and west of the site. Duplexes are found along the east side of Park Road, south of Mission Avenue. Project Description: The pi-eliminaiy plat proposes division of 3.7 acres into 17 lots for single family residences. The net density of the proposal is 4.86 units per acre. Lots within the . proposal will access vlission Avenue, Center Road and Edgerton Road. The preliminary plat nzap illustrates typical lots with fiontages ranging from 65.4 to 80.5 feet, and lot sizes ranging from 6,600 to 12,600 square feet in size. The eight lots located adjacent to Mission Avenue range from 6,681 to 7,807 square feet in size and the remaining nine lots located adjacent to Center Road and the proposed Edgei-ton Coui-t within the boundaries of the proposal range from 9,337 to 12,600 square feet in size. The Spolcane County Division of Engineering has requested that five (5) feet of Future Acquisitioil Area (FAA) be set aside along the frontage of Mission Avenue. The constniction of additional asphalt, curving and sidewallc is required along the Mission Avenue frontage and the proposed Ecigerton Court. The proposal would be served by public sewer and water. B. PROCEDURAL INFORt1~1ATION: Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapters 14.402 and 14.618 Hearing Date and Location: December 3, 1997, Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA. Notices: Mailed: Novembe►- 18, 1997, by applicant Posted: November 18, 1997, by applicant Published: November 18, 1997 Compliance: The legal requirements for public notice have been met. Site Visit: December 2, 1997 HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision 1'E-1 848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 2 Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution No. 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance) and Resolution No. 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure). Testimony: ' Tamnly Jones Scott Engelhard Division of Bttilding and Plai-Lning Division of Engineering and Roads 1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260 John Konen Dawn Smith 110 West Cataldo - 1703 North Center Road Spokane, WA 99201 Spokane, WA 99212 Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Code, and Spolcane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294. Also, Hearing Examiner Committee decision in Building and Planning Filc No. PE-1780-95. C. LAND USE ANALYSIS: In considering a rezone application, Washington law generally provides that (1) there is no _ presumption in favor of the rezone, (2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions have substantially changed in the area since the original zoning, and (3) the rezone must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safetiy, morals, or welfare. Parkridee v. Seattle, 98 Wn.2d 454, 462 (1978), Biarnson v. Kitsan Countv, 78 Wn. App. 840 (1995). Spokane County Zoning Code Section 14.402.020 (1)(2) indicates that consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, detnment to the public welfai-e, and changed circumstances are relevant criteria for the hearing body to consider in amending the official County zoninb map. To be approved, the preliminary plat and rezone must comply with the conditions and requirements set forth in the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, chapter 58.17 RCW, the Spokane County Zoning Code and other applicable land use regulations. The proposal must also comply with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21 C RCW, and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance, Chapter 11.10 of the Spokane Code. The following findings of fact and conclusions are made: 1. The oroDosal penerallv confornzs with the Spokane County Generalized Comnrehensive Plan. A county's comprehensive plan provides guidance to the hearing body in making a rezone decision. Belcher v. Kitsan Countv, 60 Wn. App. 949, 953 (1991). Deviation from a comprehensive plan does not necessarily i-ender a rezone illegal, only general conformance is required. Bassini v. Countv Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 396 (1993). See also Chapter 14.100 and Section 14.402.020 (1) of the Spokane County Zoning Code. The site is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban categoiy is intended to pi-ovide the opporttinity for a"citylil:e" environment, which includes various land uses, residential development and a high level of public facilities and urban services. It is primarily a residential category of sinJle-family, rivo-family, multi-family, and HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1845-97/ZE-54-97 Page 3 condominium buildings alonc, with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and recreational facilities. The more intensive uses such as light industrial and neighborhood commercial will be located neai• the heavily traveled streets, the least intensive single-family resiciential uses will be isolated fronl the noise and heavy traffic, and multifamily struch.ires tivill usually be a transitional use located between single-family residential and the more intensive areas. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 1, "Purpose" and "Detailed Definition". The Urban category includes the following relevant objectives and decision guidelines: Objeetive l. l.a Promote frll-in tivithin estublishecl develonment af-eas and existing oictlying commccnities ~a~here zctilities, crrter-ials, schools and colyuntenity facilities hccve already been establishecl. Decision Gt.cideline 1.1.1 Urbari clevelopment will be approvecl in ureas hccving adequate power szcpplies, tivatej•, sanitary and stoYm sewers, streets, and school and fire services, provicled that sacch clevelopment meets the iritent of other Objectives arul Decision Guidelines of this SG'CtlOi1. Decision Guideline 1.1.4 A vccriety of densities and residerrtial uses shotclcl be availczble to provicle a freedom of choice to live in Urban areas with vuryijzg densities, corrlbinations, or mix of uses (see cletailed Urban definitions). Decision Gzcideline I.Z.? The needfor recreation and open space creccted by residential developments shozcld be met and be in confof•nzcince with oYdinances, plans, and policies prior to residentiul development approval. Decision Gicicleline 1.3.3 All Urban clevelopment proposals should require plrblic scrriitary urid stornt sewer systems or interiin sewer systems to protect water quality. Decision Gzcicleline 1.4.2 Areas tivith steep slopes, szrsceptibility to landslides, o!• other hazaj'ds shozrld nol liave Urbccn lancl zrses zcnless it is shown by the cleveloper that such hazard arecrs can be developed at Urban clensities. Objective 1. S. a Neiv resiclential or ml.tltiple family shoacld be bitffered froni existing adjaceiit lancl uses where aclverse effects may develop. Decision Guideline 1.5.1 Bicffej•iri~ crrrd/or landscaping will be acsed to i-tritigate the differences bettiveen pr-oposecl developments and existing uses. Objective 1. S. c Encourage pccved str•eets and sidewalks in existing and fictLrre developinerrts where they are appropriate to tjie nature of the clevelopment. Objective 1.5. e When u neighUoj-hoocl experieiices pressitr•e for chunge iji cl•rar•acter, sarch charige shall be permittecl icpofl appropriate revielv. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 4 Objective 1.5.8 When determinirig whether a proposal will change the existing land acse charactey- of ccn area, factors to consider may inclzccle: a) the structure height of the proposal in relation to struct;cre height of nearby structures, antl b) whether new structures will have a posittve or negative impuct upon the neighborhoocl 's architectural character. Deeision Guiclelene 1.6. I Befor•e lancl icse pf-oposals are appr-ovecl they shoaclcl: cc) conform to plczrrs, policies and regailations of Coarnty tivater, sewer, stoYm sewer, utility und special service districts; b) conform to Coicnty tYansportation plans afid policies; and c) identify and take steps to resolve significcrrif adverse impacts upon e.xisting utilities, (i.e. tivater, sanitary nncl storm sewers, t111I1Zy, available and future ener•gy resoacrces), czncl traffic systems. The property is also within the Urban Impact Area (UTA) designated in the Comprehensive Plan. This is an area where growth, development and higher intensities of land use are encouraged. Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14.1.a. The UTA section of the Comprehensive Plan indicates that traditional urban problems such as incompatible land uses, environmental p,.)llution and traffic congestion will be managed with greater attention to the general public's well-being inside the UTA. Coinprehensive Plan, Objective 14.1.e. The applicant proposes to rezone tlie site from the Urban Residential-3.5 zone to the Urban Residential-7 zone. Zoning Code 14.61 8.100 provides as follows: The nzcrpose of the UR-7 zone is to set sturiclaYcls fof- the orderly clevelopment of resiclential property irz amanner that provides a desirable living envtr-onment that is corripatible with szcrrourrrling lafid uses cznd assures the protection of property values. It is intended that this zone be zesecl to aclcl to the variety of housing types and cleirsities irp to appYOxirnately seven (7) zcnits per acj-e, and as an inrplemerttation tool for the Comprehensive Plan Uyban Category. Genej•al characteristics of these areas inclccde paved roacls, public sewer arrd wateY, accessibility to scjiools and libraries, crncl a firll line ofPublic services inclacding manned fire protection and ptcblic tl-aresit accessibilrty. Medium density UR-7 cif-eas are typified by sinale fcenrily clivellings on small lots, duplexes, low density apccrtrrients and mccnufactuf-ed home parks. Some letters, a pelition and testimony were submitted by nearby landowners in opposition to the proposal, expressing concern that the increased density of the proposal over the previously approved preliminary plat would create trafFc congestion, reduce property values of single- family homes, and was inconsistent with the density of adjacent land uses. The UR-7 zone proposed for the site implements the Urban category. The net density of the proposal is approximately 4.86 units per acre, which is well within the maximum residential density recommended in the Urban categoiy of 17 units per acre. The Staff Report finds the project in general confon-nance with the Urban cate;ory and recommends its approval. The HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1845-97/ZE-54-97 Page 5 applicant proposes to seive the site with public sewer and water, modern utilities and paved roads. The site is located in the middle of an established neigllborhood, and constitutes "fill-in development", which is encotiraged in the Urban category. The Urban category encourages a mix of residential types and densities. The proposed net density of 4.86 units per acre is not significantly higher than that of the existing density of housing in the area at about 3.5 units per acre. The site is located along a Collector Arterial and near Parlc Road, a Principal Arterial, which location could justify consideration of multifalnily uses and higher urban density zoning on the site. See Zoning Code 14.620.100 and 14.622.100. vlultifamily housing and commercial zoning are found near the site. The proposal also provides intei-nal transition between Mission Avenue and the single-family properties lying nortll of the site, by increasing lot size from south to north. Single-story and two-story homes are scattered thi-oughout the stirrounding neighborhoods, so the height of the proposed uses in the proposal will be consistent with the surrounding homes. The applicant contemplates the development of only new homes, as enforced througll private covenants. The applicant plans to require a"first floor" footprint of at least 954 sguare feet of living space. The new homes would lilcely be "stick-built" homes, or possibly new manufactured homes, depending on the maricet. See testilnony of John Konen. The Hearing Exaininer has imposed the re9uirement of Spokane County Zoning Code 14.618.365, which requires the installation and maintenance of a six (6)-foot high conerete, masonry or decorative bloclc wall, solid landscaping, or site-obscuring fence. on the boundary of any UR-7 zone which abuts or lies across an alley from a UR-3.5 zone, except in the required front yard, where the fence height must be reduced. County Engineering did not object to the proposal, and there is no evidence in the record from a traffic engineering standpoint that the traffic capacity of the roads will be degraded below an acceptable level of service. As conditioned, the proposal will be reasonably compatible with the neighborhood. 2. Conditions in the area in which the propertv is located have chanized substantiallv since the pronertv vvas last zoned. In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors, including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone, and changes on the property itself. Each case is to be judged on its own merits. Biamson v. Kitsap COt121tV, sur)ra, at 846-847. A"strong" showinj of change is not required to justify a rezone. Bassini v. Countv Cominissioners, supra, at 394. tiVhere a proposed rezone implements policies of a comprehensive plan, changed circumstances are not necessarily required. Biarnson v. Kitsan Countv, sunra. ~ As indicated above, the proposal generally confornls with tlle policies of the Comprehensive Plan. CliangEd conditions supporting the project since the property was last zoned include the extension of public setiver to the area, the repaving of Mission Avenue, the upgrading of water mains, steady population growth in the Spokane Valley area, and desipation of the area within the GoLinty's interim urban growth area under the Washinorton State Gi-owth Management Act. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 6 3. The nronosal bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safetv or Qeneral welfare. The bublic use and interest will be served by approval of the proposed rezone and nreliminarv plat. The proposal malces avbronriate provision for the public health, safety and izeneral welfare. and for oaen snaces. nublic roads, water, sanitarv waste disposal, surface water drainaee and drainac-,ewavs. oarks and recreation, schools and schooNrrounds, playmunds, transit stops and other relevant facts, includine sidewall<s and other plannine features for students who onlv walk to and f-rom school. General consistency with the Coinprehensive Plan is relevant in determining whether a rezone bears a substantial relationship to the public welfare. Bassani v. Countv Commissioners, supra, at 396-98. 7'he proposal in this case generally complies with the Comprehensive Plan, as discussed above. As conditioned, the proposal will be reasonably compatible with adjacent land uses. All necessary public infrastnlcture is in place to serve the project, as indicated in the Staff Report and in the record. 4. The nronosal R-enerallv comDlies with the provisions of the State Environmental Policv Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance. No comments were received from public agencies requesting modification or withdrawal of the Determination of Nonsignificance issued for the pi-oject. The record does not indicate any sigiiificant, probable adverse environmental impacts from the proposal. The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW and chaptcr 11.10 of the Spokane County Code have been met. • 5. The pronosal. as conditioned. is consistent with the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone, the Snokane Countv Zoninc., Code and aDblicable land use reaulations. . .As conditioned, the proposal complies with the permitted uses; development standards and minimum requirements of the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone and the Zoning Code:. The..- ' applicant contended that the screeiling requirement of Zoning Code 14.618.365 should not apply to the project, which the applicant contends has been interpreted to apply only to multi-family projects in tlhe UR-7 zone. The Examiner rejects this contention, because the code section is not ambiguous on its face and there is no room for a different interpretation by County staff nor fihe Hearing Examiner. III. DECISYON Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the proposed zone reclassification and preliminary plat are her-eby approved. Such approval is subject to the conditions of the various agencies specified below. The conditions of approval recommended by public agencies which have been significailtly altered or added to by the Hearing Examiner are italicized. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval by the Hearing Examiner. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1845-97/ZE-54-97 Page 7 ! SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLAN1vING 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The preliminary plat applies to the following property: Tract 4 of Santa Rosa Park as per plat filed in Voluine B, page 78, records of Spokane County, located in the southwest quarter of section 7, Township 25 I\TOrth, Range 44 EWM, EXCEPT the west 158.00 feet thereof as shown on the sui-vey filed under Auditor's File No. 781067; and EXCEPT the east 30.00 feet for right of way as shown on Auditor's File No. 851726B. 3. The proposal shall comply with ihe Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone, as amended. The applicunt shall install screening along the north and west boundaries of the site, adjacent to UR-3. S zoning, as reqicirerl by Section 14.618.365 of the Spokafie County Zoning Cocle. 4. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. ItiTO increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 5. The Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 6. A final plat n.-rune/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee. 7. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 8. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for five (5) years, specifically,. fthwe applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request at least thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date, pursuant to the County Subdivision Ordinance. 9. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. tiVritten approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 10 The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all prlate or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: e yard and i-ear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested ui - ss these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this pl ay be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 11. Four (4) current certificates of title shall be fiirnished to the Division of Building and Planning prior to filing the final plat. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 8 , . 12. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, t11e applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 13. At the time of final plat submittal, the applicant shall demonstrate either on the face of the final plat or on an acceptable attachment that all lots located on a cul-de-sac or cunrilinear street meet or exceed the minimum required frontage. 14. A survey is required prior to filing of a final plat. 15. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planninc, at the earliest possible stage in ordel- to be informed of code reqLiii-ements administeredlenforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection, and energy code regulations. (Note: The Division of Building and Planning reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) 16. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, the applicant is required to coordinate with the United States Postal Service to determine the type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. 17. Upon filing the final plat, or a portion thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone, consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record. 18. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This title notice shall serve as a public notice of the conclitions of approval affecting the property in question. The title notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be release, in fiill or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: . The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Adminishative Official on [ imposing a variety of special clevelopment conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and . copying in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. : 19. The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right of way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in fiill or in part, by the Division. The noticc should be recorded within tlle same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 5 feet of resei-ved fiirilre acquisition area for road right of way and utilities, in addition to the existinc, and/or newly dedicated right of way along Mission Avenue. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 9 f b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured froin the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right of way and utilities. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocated such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 20. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows: Prior to issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provision of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows: 21. The preliminary plat of Bradley Heights, PE-1780-95, as appr•oved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on November 16, 1995, is null and void. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS 1. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. ,40 e That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to constniction andlor the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. AOO'That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to consh-liction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approveci construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1 848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 10 Y 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of- way until a pernzit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 6. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of constniction of improvements. construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system. 8. The applicant shall dedicate right of way for the extension of Edgerton Court. Dedication for Edgerton Court shall include the applicable right of way for a standard cul de sac. Additional dedication of right of way shall include the applicable radius at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Center Road. 9. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Edgerton Court which is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of 28-30 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 0 i 10 The CoLinty Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the rovement of Mission Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 11. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 95-0498, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, draina~e and fees in new construction. 12. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 13. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Mission Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recominended that a strip of propin width along the Mission Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Mission Avenue. 14. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spol<ane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjusfiment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. HE Findirlgs, Conclusions and Decision PE-1 848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 11 ! 15. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide public sewer system shall be constructed. A sewer connection permit is required. 2. The applicant shall submit expressly to the Spokane County Division of Utilities, "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval prior to the finalization of the project and/or the issuance of a permit to connect. 3. The plans shall be submitted prior to the finalization of the project. 4. Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of the public sewer connection and facilities. 5. Ai-rangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of a sewer con.nection permit. 6. Concerns regarding Stormwater and Groundwater issues will be addressed separately by the Water Resources Section. 7. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System plan for Spokane County, as amended. SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 1. The applicant shall install rivo fire hydrants for this proposal, one at the southeast or southwest corner of Nora and Edgerton, and one at the northwest or northeast corner of Center and Mission. . SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT ~ 1. The -f nal plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record andlor any attached sheets as noted. - 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution Uy the Division of Buildin~ and Planning to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer, and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies shall be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method sllall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 12 ~ 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use, and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency stiitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the f nal plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health autliorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District, and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. 1 A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will i ~y available for the plat and individual selvice will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of dividual on-site sewage disposal sysfiems shall not be authorized. 1 he dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is i13. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, Division of Building and Planning and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of eac11 lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Page 13 t DATED this 2nd day of March, 1998. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Mic6ael C. Dempsey, WSBA #k35 NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICF OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on a combined application for a zone reclassification and preliminary plat, and the accompanying SEPA determination, is final and conclusive unless within ten (10) calendar days from the Examiner's written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, , RCW 36.70B.110 (9) indicates that administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be filed with the legislative body witllin fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of the decision. • This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant on March 2, 1998. DEPENDING ON WHICH APPEAL PERIOD REFERENCED ABOVE LEGALLY APPLIES, THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS EITHER MARCH 12,998 OR 1VIARCH 16, 1998. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490. The file may be inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, beriveen the llours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County Ordinance. . ~ . r J HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1845-97/ZE-54-97 Page 14 A J 2~~- ~ LE y - Z r•~ t c,~,`,z, U ~ ~kA./ 1 FINAL BUILDING PERMITS 5/28/97 FINALIZED SITE ADDRESS NRME 6 PROJECT PARCEL # FILE# MYLAR BY DATE c FREYA N 7610 LUMBER YD/TRUSS PLANT-MOMB STEEL 36271.0308 893101 PL 3/28/95 YES FREYA N 7610 STORAGE BLDG-MOMB STEEL 36271.0308 B99112 G-98 PL 3/16/95 FREYA N 8525 MY FAMILY CONTRACTOR-TRUSS FABRICATION CldG 36223.9017 B95155 DB 8/15/96 FREYR S 5101 PARK HTS BAPTIST-CHURCH 3403 B91047 BT 11/27/91 FREYA S 5408 [QMBI RADIO-ADD OEFICE 3903 690108 BT 10/3/90 FREYA S 5607 -RELOCATE STORAGE BLDG 3512 B70019 BT 5/31/99 GARDEN SPRINGS W 9527 JEHOVAH'S WITNESS-CHURCH S.H.KINGDOM HALL 2527 B92091 BT 12/8/92 GARDEN SPRINGS W 5711 WILLIRMS BROS CONST-OFFICE/Y7HSE/SHOP 25392.9064 B95199 DB 5/19/96 GARFIELD SP CP L-RESTROOM/ENTRY 1519 B70112 GN 1/25/88 GARFIELD N 900 SPO CO PARKS-RESTROOM ORV pHASE 9 15149.9008 B96017 DB 1/9/96 GRRFIELD N OE HWY 2 SPO CO PARKS-CTRL BLDG TOWER 1514 890041 SE 9/23/90 GEZGER E 3025 ALLOY TRAILERS-PREFAB EQPT SHELTER/TOWER 11 25331.0217 897009 DB 1/8/97 GEIGER S 1724 A T& T wIRELESS SER-TOWER 50' / W STRG 25272.9092 B96131 DB 8/7/96 GEIGER S 1905 SPOKANE PRODUCE-WHSE/STRG/SHIPPZNG 25272.9099 B95080 G-50 PL 6/30/95 GEIGER S 1905 SPOKANE PRODUCE-ADD 2 STORY OFFICE LUNCHRM 25272.9165 896012 DB 1/2/96 GEZGER S 2900 RECYCKE CTR- 2533 B70053 GN 3/10/90 GEIGER S 2900 WASTE TO ENERGY-ADD STGE BLDG HOUSE NOLD H/ 25331.9009 B96193 DG 7/29/96 GEIGER S 2900 Y7ASTER TO ENERGY PLANTADD-ASH HANDLING BLDG 25331.9009 B99037 PL 11/1/94 GEIGER S 3025 ALLOY TRAILERS-ADD OFFICE BLDG 25331.0217 B96133 DB 9/13/96 GEIGER S 3025 ALLOY TRAILERS-ADD STG BLDG 25331.0217 B95184 DB 12/16/95 GEIGER S 3025 CELLULAR-COhIIVIUNICATION BLDG 25331.0213 B99188 PL 1/27/95 GEIGER S 3025 -ADD 2 ND STORY OFFICE BLDG 2533 B70089 GN 10/28/88 GEIGER S 3709 -SIGN 2533 B70098 BM 12/27/89 GEIGER S 3709 FLYING J-ADD CANOPY & CANOPY EXTENSION 25335.0119 B96236 DB 1/13/97 GEIGER S 3711 MOTEL BEST WESTERN-APT 120 UNIT /REST 25339.0129 899156 PL 8/3/95 GEIGER S 3711 SHARLEY DEV-RESTAURANT (80 UNIT MOTEL) 24339.0121 870008 SE 7/10/95 GEIGER S 3715 WEST PLAIN TRAVEL-MOTEL, REST/TRUCK STOP 2533 B70096 GN 12/31/91 YES GBIGER S 9300 PRIVATE CAR WASH-DEALER AC1T0 AUCTION 25333.0302 B99187 PL 2/21/95 GEIGER S 4300 STAGING AREA-AUTO AUCTION 25333.0302 699043 PL 9/7/99 GEIGER S 4300 AUTO AUCTION-BLDG 2533 B90103 BT 10/23/90 GEIGER W 7626 GODWIN ENG-REPAZR SHOP 2905 892093 PL 2/15/95 GEIGER W 7626 GODWIN EQUZPTMENT-SHOP/OFFICE 29051.9096 B95002 DB 3/2/95 GEIGER W 7709 MCDONKEY AUTO/BOAT SALES-ADD SHOP 29051.9072+ B94114 PL 6/28/95 YES GEIGER W 8012 SPEC MACHIN MFG-ADD ASSEMBLY b STORAGE 29051.9094 893055 BT 6/22/93 GIBBS W 2205 SPO FALL'S EQUISTIAN CTR-INDOOR RIDING STAB 29252.9004 870009 SE 6/28/95 GILBERT E 21312 LONGYEAR WSELL DRILLING-ADD TRUCK WASH PAD 56339.9165 B99183 PL 11/18/99 GILBERT E 21318 -AAD STORAGE w/CHG 5633 890049 GN 5/7/90 GLENNAIRE S 5011 SPRINT SPECTRUM-COMMUNICATIONS ANTENNA 39021.9099 B96168 DB 8/26/96 Yes GLENNAIRE S 5011 -4dATER TANK 1 MG & VALUE VAULT 3902 B90016 SE 5/2/90 GLENNGRAE LN E 5016 GLENGRAE PUD PE-1565-POOL HOUSE 34022.9062 B93113 CR 8/13/99 GOVERNMENT WAY N 211 GREENWOOD MEM PK-VEHICLE MTNS EAC 25195.9013 B95013 PL 8/10/95 GOVERNMENT WAY N 211 FAIRMOUNT MEMORIAL CEMETARY-MAUSOLE(JM 25195.9013 B93115 BT 8/17/93 GOVERNMENT WAY N 508 EAIRMOUNT MEM-CREMATORIUM PHASE II 25145.9017 B99193 PL 1/25/95 YES GaVERNMENT taAY N 508 F'AIRMOUNT MEM-EUNERAL HOME 25195.9017 B94190 [QM 9/12/95 GRANITE LAKE RD S 11907 GTE TEA GROUP-TOWER 80' TEMP 19275.9001 B97036 DB 2/19/97 GRAVES E 101 -APT 20 UNIT 3617 B91031 G-95 BT 5/20/93 GRAVES E 3116 GREEN CROw-CONVERT STRG RM TO OFFICE - LOG 36152.9018 B97002 VS 1/15/97 GREENBLUFF E 4526 -FDN & MODULAR EOR CLASSROOM 3626 B70291 BM 7/17/89 GREENBLUFF E 7714 GREENSLUFF-14ATER TANK 100,000 47193.9086 894128 PL 11/12/99 GREEtdBLUFF E 9819 SPO CO FD#4-FIRE STATION 9720 887064 JS 10/13/87 GROVE S 4122 PRODUCE SUPPLY-WHOLE SALE FOOD DIST 25339.9033 899107 KM 5/9/95 GROVE S 9125 HADLEY-MINI STG 19 BLDG 25352.9099 899125 PL 8/23/95 YES GROVE S 4315 PRODUCE SUPPLY-OFICE/SEMZ TK SER 29032.9054 B93166 PL 3/6/95 YES 1 i • ~ S P O K A N E G O U N'1-' Y BUILDING AND PLANNWG • A DIVISION OF TME PUBLIC WORF:S DEPARTMENT ]AMrs L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., D[RECfOR MEMORANDUM TO: r Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red • Spokane Regional Healtli District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Divisio» of Building and Planning; Jeff Forry Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley Development Engineering Services; Biil Hemmings, Spokane County Air Polltition Co»trol Authority Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer Fire Protection District No. l, No. 4 West Valley School District No. 363 Spokane County Water District No. 3 Spol:ane County Baundary Review Board; S«san WincheU Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glenn Miles Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston WA State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) VVA State Department of Fisli & Wildlife; Kevin Robinette FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: November 7, 1997 SUBJCCT: Review and comments for be(ow listed files for the heari o bmm Please review and return any comments for the following files by November 18, 1997. If you have ai1y comments regarding roads and circulation in your response, please forward that response also to _ the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Please fonvard your comments to the attention of the :tssigned nlanncr. 1. CUN-26-97 Sec. 17-27-44 Sponsor: Eckart Salquist Assigned ['lanner: Francine Sliaw 2. PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Bradley (-Ieiglits UR-3.5 to UR-7 Sec. 7-25-44 Spansvr: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. Assigned Planner: Tammy Jones I026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTQN 99260 PHONS: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . ~ RECE-VED NOV 25 1997 SPOKANE COUNN ENGINEER STAFF REPORT7O THE HEARING EXAMINER - . . `FILE•.#: PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 . . /~~~1 ` • r , DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING SPOICANE COUNn - HEARING DATE: December 3, 1997 FiLE PE-1848/ZE-54-97 PROJECT PLANNER: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Preliminary plat to divide approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for single family residences with a net density of 4.86 lots per acre and Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat and - • zone reclassification. . Project Data Project Locatiori:. Generally located north of and adjacent to Mission - Avenue and between Center Road and Edgerton - Road in the SW % of S 7, T 25 N., Range 44 EWM. Parcel Number(s) 45073.0505 Applicant Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. . 8121 E. Maringo Spokane, WA. 99212 Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~ Urban Zoning: - ~ Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Existing_Land Use: - ~ ~ Vacant and undeveloped. Surrounding Zoninq and Land Uses:. ~ • - North: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Single family residential South: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), Regional Business (B-3); Single family residential • East: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Single family residential • West: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), Light Industrial (I-2); , Single family residential Known Land Use Proposals and Indiana Place, PE-1766-97, a three (3) lot preliminary Recent Project Approvals in the plat with a net density of 3.58 units per acre. Area of this-Project Approved January 27, 1995. Land Division Status: Parcel created in 1978 through an Assessor's ~ Segregation. There is no Certificate of Exemption on ~ file recognizing the parcel creation. PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Staff Report - December 3, 1997 Hearing 1 of 5 Shoreline Designation: Not applicable Water Purveyor: Spokane County Water District #3 Sewage Disposal: Public Sewer Fire District Spokane County Fire District #1 School District -West Valley School District #363 Nearest Arterial and Distance: Mission Avenue is designated as a Collector Arterial by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Park Avenue is located 150' west of the site and is _ designated as a Principal Arterial. Nearest Parks and Distance: Park Pool is located approximately 3/ mile south of . the site. _Neighborhood Association: None identified. • This proposal is located inside the IUGA. • This proposal is located inside the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA). • This proposal is located outside the 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural Resource Lands. l • GMA/Critical Areas Aquifer Recharge Area: . Subject property is located within the Priority Sewer ~ Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone (ASA). , Fish & Wildlife' Habitat Conservation None illustrated on the Spokane County Critical Areas: ~ : - Areas Maps. Floodplain. Not applicable. Geologically Hazardous Areas: None illustrated on the Spokane County Critical - Areas Maps. Wetlands: None illustrated on the Spokane County Critical - Areas Maps or Wetland Inventory Maps. SEPA DNS issued on November 7, 1997 Comment period ends on December 1, 1997 Noticinq Published: November 18, 1997 Mailing Deadline: November 18, 1997; notice mailed to 81 property owners. Site Posting Deadline: November 18, 1997; sign posted on Mission Avenue. 1724 Comaliance Dates Application Accepted: October 10, 1997 Technicalfy Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: October 14, 1997 Date Notice of Decision is Due: February 11, 1998 Reviewinq Aaencies 16 Agencies were notified on 9-16-97and 11-7-97. Comments were due on 9-25-97 and 11-18-97. PE-1848-971ZE-54-97 Staff Report - December 3, 1997 Hearing 2 of 5 Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Received Received Received Received Spokane County Division Yes 9-25-97 Spokane County Division No of Engineering and of Utilities, Water Roads, Transportation Resources Spokane County Division Yes 11-10-97 Washington State No of Engineering and Department of Roads, Drainage Transportation Spokane County Division No Spokane Regional No of Long Range Planning Transportation Council Spokane Regional Health Yes 9-25-97 Spokane Transit No District Authority Spokane County Division Yes 10-8-97 Washington State No of Utilities Boundary Review Board Spokane County Parks, No West Valley School No Recreation & Fair District No. 363 Spokane County Air No Fire District No. 1 Yes 11-14-97 Pollution Control Authority Washington State No Spokane County Water No Department of Ecology District #3 ~ Resaonses from the Public: , Responses received from property owners in the area express concern that the proposed density will result in increased traffic, reduced land values, and is incompatible with the existing densities in the surrounding neighborhood. . Descriotion of the Site: The site is flat and undeveloped. The site is approximately 3.7 acres in size and is accessed by Mission Avenue, Center Road and Edgerton Road. The surrounding neighborhood consists primarily of single family residences on lots ranging from 8,500 to 15,000 square feet in size. A 13-unit apartment building is located southeast of the site and an elementary school and grange are located west of Park Road. Oescriation of the Proposal: The proposal is a preliminary plat to divide approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for single family residences with a zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). The net density of the proposal is 4.86 units per acre. Lots within the proposal will access Mission Avenue, Center Road and Edgerton Road. The preliminary plat map illustrates typical lots with frontages ranging from 65.4 to 80.5 feet, and lot sizes ranging from 6,600 to 12,600 square feet in size. The eight lots located adjacent to Mission Avenue range from 6,681 to 7807 square feet in size and the remaining nine lots located adjacent to Center Road and the proposed Edgerton Court range from 9,337 to 12,600 square feet in size. The Spokane County Division of Engineering has requested that five (5) feet of Future Acquisition Area (FAA) be set aside along the frontage of Mission Avenue. The construction of additional asphalt, curbing and sidewalk is required along the Mission Avenue frontage and the proposed Edgerton Court. The proposal will be served by public sewer and water. The applicant has not proposed a phasing plan. The site is located within the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA) with transit available north of the site along Trent Avenue. Backqround: The subject property was subject to a previous preliminary plat, PE-1766-95, which was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on November 17, 1995 and consists of 12 single family lots with a net density of 3.24 units per acre in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. If the proposed preliminary plat and zone reclassification is approved by the Hearing Examiner, PE-1780-95 shall become null and void. PE-1848-972E-54-97 Staff Report - December 3, 1997 Hearing 3 of 5 _ The existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone was established in 1991, pursuant to the Program to Implement the zoning code. Prior to 1991, the subject property was zoned Agricultural Suburban (AS) in 1954. Most of the surrounding area is zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Regional Business (6-3) zoning is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Mission Avenue and Center Road. Light Industrial (I-2) zoning is found along the west side of Park Road. Staff Analvsis: The site is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category is intended to provide for the development of a ucity-like" environment which includes various land uses, intensive residential development, and public facilities. Recommended densities will range from 1 to 17 units per acre. The proposed net density of 4.86 units per acre is consistent with the recommended density range. Goal 1.1 of the Urban category is to "Encourage a variety of housing types and densities". Objective 1.1 a is to "Promote fill-in within established development areas and existing outlying communities where utilities, arterials, schools and community facilities have already been established". Decision Guideline 1.1.1 states that "Urban development will be approved in areas having adequate power supplies, water, sanitary and storm sewers, streets, and school and fire services provided that such development meets the intent of other Objectives and Decision Guidelines of this section." The site is located in the middle of an established neighborhood and is served by a full line of public services including public water and sewer. Both an elementary and middle school are located within a mile of the site. The site is located adjacent to a collector arterial and 150 feet east of a principal arterial. Decision Guideline 1.1.4 states " A variety of densities and residential uses should by available to provide a freedom of choice to live in Urban areas with varying densities, combinations, or mix of uses..." and Objective 1.5a says that " New residential or multiple-family l developments should, be buffered from existing adjacent land uses where adverse effects may develop". The proposed net density of 4.86 units per acre is only slightly higher than the existing densities in the surrounding area of approximately 3.5 units per acre. The preliminary plat design provides a density buffer to the adjacent neighbqrhood north of the site by placing the smallest lots adjacent to Mission Avenue and the larger lots on the northern portion of the pfat. The proposed preliminary plat and zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) is generally supported by the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The intent of Section 14. 402 of the Zoning Code is to allow for amendments to the zoning map and states that "circumstances may arise that make it necessary to revise these documents from time to time". Changed circumstances in the general area include the extension of public sewer to the site. The purpose of the proposed Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone is to set standards for the orderly development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values. The intent is that this zone be used to add to the variety of housing types and densities, up to approximately seven (7) units per acre, and as an implementation tool for the Comprehensive Plan Urban category. General characteristics of these areas include paved roads, public sewer and water, accessibility to schools and libraries, and a full line of public services including manned fire protection and public transit accessibility. The proposed zone recfassification is generally consistent with the purpose and intent of proposed Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone due to the availability of a full line of public services and close proximity to schools and other services. The proposed preliminary plat map meets and/or exceeds the minimum development standards of the proposed Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) for frontage, setbacks and minimum lot size. The proposed net density of 4.86 units is well below the maximum allowable net density of seven (7) units per acre. Affected agencies have submitted requested conditions of approval that are standard for a preliminary plat and rezone application. PE-1848-972E-54-97 Staff Report - December 3, 1997 Hearing 4of5 Staff Recomrnendation: The Division of Building and Planning recommends approval, as conditioned. Attachments: A. Vicinity Map • Site Plan • Comprehensive Plan Map ~gency Zoning Map B. and Public Comments C. Conditions of Approval PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 Staff Report - December 3, 1997 Hearyng 5of5 VICINITY . PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 ~'~r~.P ix . ~ :r~:::: i= . t . c ai . • , ~ S: • ~ t•' ►"1 }l . :•1• ~r . . . . ~ Q • - :-~..;~:-r:ti~::•:ti::.' i: . . 1•: t~: 8ER ` r-- - cy ~ - p,~ ~ ~ : . . . - 'r'.::::::::~ ; "r:•:'•:: . - . - . . . . . ~ . ICfC z - _ ~ ~ / Y~ U , L ~ : : : ~ R a ~ L . ~ f•~~~. ~ ~ , r - ~ 4 ~ AC~ R { r ~ f~ : • •Q;~•.:: C 1 ~ j ~ • V'.: : :U CK S.~i~► T a ~ E:ETA F ►~"'~L--•: ~ : . •i.• : : , ~ACrCSO;J i i t.~:} • U ~ / - A t • 1b'1.E z F .AR ~ ~ .r.• lt1 7 • ~ Z U ~ : :.:..v ~ ~ ' ~ f~4AN.~ ~,~.c~ I~~ <14oxl 2 TRENT ~ [ iN0 A ~ ~ ~ 2JO N p W .t"~{~ ~ ~ Q V • _ laJ ~~i~ ~ W .41 - 111CCtM1 4 cr. ~ ~ ,~,+1 A r 1 1 ~ : ~ , C ~ GNTO - Sr1ARP a ~ O Y p tsmE t ~ 7 ~OE ~ U, ~ a 4 ~~caq 1 -4 -i~ < ~ ~i Q- ~ ~ •~0 -~a U. aiit 0tJ I a, 0 ~ m PROAnwe ~f- ~ A ~c9 rPSTfl ~ A1 Kt p 'GROUNDS AL.KI ~ Z 'JF lNDIANS v A LL S TADI UM u HA u aIN ~ ~ Iv~R.. E , i 16 d ► ~ ~ ` ' d zi ~ hss fzo . `3F2O N drp ~ DiSN~~taN • . ~ rrc.z 5 CaX,P ~ 6 TIA ~ xAFo_ - ~a ^ I,~ { l ~ ~TM~ . ~ ~,H ~ z . ,nr,4, I h, zH ~t?r= rjo'C- to scale VICINITY MAP ,~T~ °y I ~r~+ ~,a• ~ ._s ' ~ ~ ~r~+ N o~EC'T a z P~ELIM~NA yV.t,A• ocX 'ccoN ~ a , f z p~ . ,M 1 .4 E• r d~ 7 25 ~ ~ . Y g p sW 11 o W ASHjr1G'TO ~ N ~ Q. T~aN ~F NE c~uN gE1N~ A PQ~ Sp~K~ ,.rs`°`1 ~ d p J b o~ K/'~° ~ ~y 100 , .,i: ~ ~ 50 ,u,• « ^n a •,Ox i'''•'t; oII GI',-„", ~ ~ yy ~ y { ~1~~~ I r 1 • (~•t{ ~:I.`••' 1 ~ i ~ ~ 1 t ` e ws.A I • 1 W ~ ♦ ` Y ~ ^A,~C.."D ~ptmm ` 51 ! >O ?•.\r~j~^ ~ ~ ` ip3~ I ~ i ` q ~ P,~S ~ C Q N~v" ~ « y,~ ~ ~a ~ `u~"~ 1 • 1 Q /1 q 'J !V ~ y111M' l' 1 ~ ~ ~,,v; oV +o ~ ,,4„ ~ ~ r ,rr< < ~ r F 0• ~ ~ ~ ~ 3Y q f , Kcroo ' e~~h°w r ' ; ~e~►' . yII 1 Z 6 pr.K vru+" " ('f I C I ~ ' . l ~L+" r ` 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ a' 6+~e 5,-''' '~.^'t~`r~ ` t+ ~o w~``~y•"J1~'~~ t~~ V''/ ~~,~+r,,,,, 3 &'TM ~ Y'V '~..,~!yK~~ + ~ ~ ~,.y W` U•~ p,~ n. i I L ~ ~ ~ '..t~~ • ^n ~ r~ ~ , o~, ~ zI O v ~ c~•+~ s~ ° TO~~ , ~~„r~, . ' 1.1155iCµ ~ cc COUNI - pKP~ ~ d ~ I t a 3r ~ 0 ~ „~s ,~,,,~.y ,~,,,,..n Fauno~ ~z,».::• 4R ~ti'n~~^ trv~y" r Qv, ~;i• ~ tW' y„`^°~ ~y„ H W) ~ .U'0. v+~ ♦ j w' y,~„i4, e• ~ ~~r+.~ / ~ J • .I'•' ~ u 1 , ! . _54 PLAN _91 COM-PRE14EN,,k. . ► ~ Q : - ~ y ~ ~ . ~ ~ 1• ' - - L- E 1 ~ . • ,1•~"'~~;_ ~ ' - . i ~ 1~ .."~~:~'.~w~1~~+.~;~"f% i . _1y~ • .`"ti. ' ~ ` ~~,r:~ ' . ~ " .,,r~.• • . , ~ ' 1 r~ . • . r► +.~~~^4 • ` ~ -)n ~ ~ +`•,~.1. ~ 1 - ~ ~ ~t • j '/i t' ~ +r •~!'1 + ~ ' , ~ N ~ • t~ . . ~ , 5• 1.; • ~ ~ . . ~ ~~'ti~f • ' ~ . • • ry ' M • ~ ~ ~:i: ~ ".r• .1'• ' ' • ~ ; I . :l: • ~ • ° ` ~ ~ , ana1 . . tr,p ~ ► .~t~ . . ~ n AI5S1O . ~ . - ~ . • . _ . ~ ~ , ~ . . . _ . te : . ~ - . , ; el l o tur scale COMPREHENSIVE Pl-~N ~Iot to PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 ZONING MAP 3.0233 3 08151 3.0817 3.0302 .-a812 J. 080: 3.0232 3.0613 •0814 y•0816 3.Illt ' a.ozo~ ~ .0~3~ en A. oso~ - 3.0309 3.0310 ~ 1.0803 3.oaio $•osoe 3.080) [3•0809 3•0803 3.111; 3.0?29 ~ J.OJ04 :I.OJO: F. Nora Nora Nora _ . , . , 1.0255 .3•0257 7•0286 3.0251 3.0709 3.0726 1•0713 1.0711 J.0?S 3.~73.0T1~ J.07l1 ; 3.a252 3.0267 3.0263 3.0708 P~~~~(al~~b - L 3.0261 L q-0722 3.0720 1.0718 7.0716 m . 3.0262 3.0263 3•0269 - .072: 7.0721 3.07ISI 3.071; 1.071: W 3.0.01 ~ J.026J b 3.0271 3.0270 ~1C W ~ , `1i'u g v ~ t a 3.0502 ~ 7.0614 ~.0611 3.060j i.0607 i 7 54 3.061. 3'061: 3.061 3.060: S.Obat 3.I:t I ~ 3.0503 .050 t~-33 171~ ~ 1.0616 0618 0620 ~3.0622 ' v .13c. c 3.061: 3•061 3.061. 3.062 3•062: W ~ 3.050~ ~j ~ = c - _ • !1"1 ~S - ~ r , • _ • - , . - i'`~~.. = r . " ? i 2.0415 2.0426 2~ 2~~ut~~:.~ ,`~t~ ;~:Dt"• 0329 2.0330 2. 021 3 2• 02 12 2.0211 •='%z;°.~~.:,•~, a 2.04J0 2•0429 2.04 28 2.0427 ;r'?~a• =~4t":~t 'p2.G318 ~ j :?.OJ2Z: 11 ~ (T"I.~~ •~41..R • rrtfi~~ C ~ i \ I l c y rrG'~r •~-;y~;~ ,l~i~~ .,~Ft 2.0416 2.0425 2•03o3 2.0214 ~i a 1 2.0215 •k~ a UR-0S 3156 0 XI~6 qt 01 2.041' ~Ac~~°`~` 2.0217 2.0216 ~ 2.0119 2.OA20 2.0421 2.04221 ~ 2.0331 2.0332 - 2.0312 2.0313 • 2.04ia 02a3 2.0423 j` Wes:VallevAdd# 2.,,~ -.~5659 ~ ~ ~ z. 0222 ~ Max+ra I I a ~ ~ .w.~,`~!!5c .'!•1 - - , I ~ 2.0319 ?-03h3 n ~ 2.02t9 ~ ?Z17 2.0316 2.03t~ 2•0440 2.0441 ~ 2.0439 .043~.pa3.~2.043~ 2.0315 ~l ~ z.oazoBR-3'~~56$9 , t Z.oaos 2.0407 2.o4~z ~ .a1zz 2.0323 2.0324 ~ - y ~-3-5 ~ 2.0436 2.0137 2.0438 c 2.0321 2 5•~n~~ ~S info 2.0413 i ' 7.0e12 2.0111 2•0325 y g~. '.0629 • 2.04tQ 2.O4a9 2.0408 ~ 2.0326 2.0601 2•041< ' 2•0630 _ ` . . UR 3.5 56 59 2•9116 2.0603 .,1 2.C605 1'I0t to sca? e ZONING . ' i OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 102E W Broadway Ave, Spokane, UTA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" PLATS T0: Spokane County Planning Department - FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: November 17, 1997 PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS FILE PE-1848-97 / Hearing: 12/03/1997 @10:30 #2 Review Date: Sponsor/Applicant: JOHN KONEN Section Township Range: 07-25-44 Planner: TAMMY JGNFS Technical Review Date: (09/25/1997 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced , application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the " Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Finuings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. 1. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. CC: Aoolicant JOHN KONEN Engineer/Surveyor KERREL BELL Planner TAMMY J0NES • Page 2 of 2 12/03/1997 09/25/1997 PE-1898-97 6. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system. 8. The applicant shall dedicate right of way for the extension of Edgercon Court. Dedication for Edgerton Court shall include the applicable right of way for a standard cul de sac. Additional dedication of right of way shall include the applicable radius at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Center Road. 9. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Edgerton Court which is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of 28-30 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. ~ 10. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Mission Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. • The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 11. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 95-0498, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 12. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 13. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Mission Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 5 feet in width along the Mission Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Mission Avenue. 14. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside futu-re acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. { • Page 3 of 3 12/03/1997 09/25/1997 PE-1848-97 15. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 1 , SPOKAIYE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDI T10NS a. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the prelinunary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. b. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preli.minary plat of record for d.istribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer, and the Spokane County Health DistricL Written approvai of the easements by the utility companies shall be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. c. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. d. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. ! e. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. f. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each Iot of the plat. g. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat h. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use, and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health _ authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the fil'ing of the final plat, on the face of sa.id water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequatety satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproductiom i. The purveyor will also certify prior to fiiing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that ' appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District, and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. CONDTTIONS Page 2 j. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. k. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 1. The ded.icatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." M. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "'I'he public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by County and State health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Buiiding and Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be > installed within this subdivision, and the applicant shall provide for ind.ividual dom:stic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot" , ~ To: TAMMY JONES, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning - Design Review From: Jim Red/Spokane County Utilities Date: 10/8/97 Subject Conditions of Approva! Planning Action Number: PE-1848-97 Type of Action: PSZR BRADLEY HEIGHTS & ZE-54-97 Applicant: JIM MAHAR HOMES, INC Legal Owner: JIM MAHAR Sewer Service: - SS09 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. Sewer connection perrnit is required. ~ The project lies in the West Valley Sewer Project which is to be constru;ted in 1997. SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval. ~ SS12E The plans shall be submitted prior to the finalization of the project. SS13A Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of the public sewer connections and facilities SS15 Arrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of sewer connection permit. SS22 Concerns regarding Stormwater and Groundwater issues will be addressed separately by the Water Resources Section. Water Service: WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 11/14/97 FRI 15:56 FA% 509 81 125 SPORANE VALLEY FIRE T, 444 BUILDIVG CODES Qh002 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokone County Flie District 1 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WA 99206-3676 •(509) 926-1700 • FAX (509) 892-4125 R. PoA HurnpFvies ' Chlef November ia, 1997 Tamiay Jones Department of Building and Planning w 1026 Sroadway Spokane, WA 99260 RE: PE-1848-97 l Bradley Heiqhts • Dear Ms. Jones: . The Spokane Valley fire Departiaent will require the installation of two fire hydrants for this proposal. #1 - at-the SE or SW corner of Nora and Edgerton. #Z - at the NW or NE corner-of Center and Mission. Access appears adequate. S4ce y, ller ~Fire Inspector KM/sa DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. The preliminary plat applies to the following property: Tract 4 of Santa Rosa Park as per plat filed in Volume B, page 78, records of Spokane County, located in the southwest quarter of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM; EXCEPT the west 158.00 feet thereof as shown on the survey filed under Auditor's File No. 781067; and EXCEPT the East 30.00 feet for right-of-way as shown on Auditor's File No. 951726B. 3. The proposal shall comply with the proposed Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone, as amended. 4. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or numbers of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. a . , 5. The Division of Building and Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. . 6. A final plat/name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Division Director/designee. 7. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 8. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for five (5) years, specifically to January 1, 2003. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date. 9. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. . 10. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 11. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Spolcane County Division of Building and Planning prior to filing the final plat. 12. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. . 13. At the time of final plat submittal, the applicant shall demonstrate either on the face of the final plat or on an acceptable attachment that all lots located on a cul-de-sac or curvilinear street meet or exceed the minimum required frontage. 14. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 15. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planning at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection, and energy code regulations. (Note: The Division of Building and Planning reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) 16. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. 17. Upon filing the final plat, or portion thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to Urban ~ Residential-7 (UR-7), consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record. 18. The Building and Planning Division sha11 prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This title notice shall serve as a public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The title notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building & Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as is the subject.of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on , imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building & Planning. 19. The Spokane County Building and Planning Division shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Division. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 5 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Mission Avenue. b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. c. No required landscapin~, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located within the fiiture acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. . . If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. . e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 20. The Division of Building and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows: "Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer ~ Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows: OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" PLATS TO: Spokane County Planning Departmen p FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads v DATE: November 17, 1997 PROJECT: BRADLEY BEIGHTS FILE # : PE-1848-97 / Hearing: 12/03/1997 @10:30 #2 Review Date: Sponsor/Applicant: JOHN KONEN Section Township Range: 07-25-44 Planner: TAMMY JONES Technical Review Date: (09/25/1997 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. 1. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. CC: Applicant JOHN KONEN Engineer/Surveyor KERREL BELL Planner TAMMY JONES , Page 2 of 2 12/03/1997 09/25/1997 PE-1848-97 6. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. Approach Permits are required for any access to the Spokane County road system. 8. The applicant shall dedicate right of way for the extension of Edgerton Court. Dedication for Edgerton Court shall include the applicable right of way for a standard cul de sac. Additional dedication of right of way shall include the applicable radius at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Center Road. 9. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Edgerton Court which is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of 28-30 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 10. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Mission Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5-10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 11. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 95-0498, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 12. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 13. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Mission Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 5 feet in width along the Mission Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Mission Avenue. 14. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or . relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. . ~ Page 3 of 3 12/03/1997 09/25/1997 PE-1848-97 15. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. OFFICE OF THE SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" REONES TU: Spokane County Building and Plaruii#zg D partme i FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: July 10, 1997 PROJECT: MINING CRUSHED ROCK FILE / ZS-0045-97) Hearing Date: « HearingDate» «HearingTime» @«Hearing» # Review Date Sponsor/AppliGant: BERT WOLFRUM Section Township Range: 24-22-43 Planner: LOUIS WEBSTER Design/Review Date: (07/10/1997 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access plans. 3. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased. 4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 5. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of . construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. CC: Applicant BERT WOLFR[7M Engineer/Surveyor LAWRENCE LEINWEBER Page 2 «HearingDate» 07/10/1997 ZS-0095-97 6. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 7. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. Al1 work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 8. he County Arterial Road plan identifies Spangle-Waverly Road as a 70 foot Country Principal Arterial. The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 5 in width along the Spangle-Waverly Road frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Spangle-Waverly Road. 9. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 10. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. 11. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. ~ Page 3 «HearingDate» 07/10/1997 ZS-0045-97 If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor(s)further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount'of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is . created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Spangle-Waverly Road. l ~ ~ Kimball, Sandy U From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Monday, November 10, 1997 11:19 AM To: Jones, Tammy Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimball, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott; Pederson, John Subject: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. Importance: High 11-10-97 I received the above referenced project application on Nov. 7, 1997. The SCS Soils Map identifies this area as being Garrison Gravely Loam soils. The soil survey in this area is known to be accurate. Therefore, since this is an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no concept drainage plan is required. We have no information that says there are any critical areas on this site. I consider this proposal to be technically incomplete until an agreement to pay fees is submitted. I recommend using the standard drainage condition. f~1lZ i~e«~cacl~c~ Page 1 n l OFFICE OF THE SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER - 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR-PLATS TU: Spokane County Building and Plannilig D artment FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads ~ DATE: September 25, 1997 ~ PROJECT: BRADLEY HEIGHTS FILE PE-1848-97 / ) Hearing Date: @ # Review Date SFonsor/Applicant: JOHN KONEN Section Township Range: 07-25-44 Planner: TA►MMY JONES Technical/Review Date: (09/25%1997 @ 1:15) The Spokane County Engineering Deparfiment has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the Technical Review Meeting. 1. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. That plans, profiles and cross sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. . 4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. S. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. CC: Applicant JOHN KONEN Engineer/Surveyor JOHN KONEN t Page 2 09/25/1997 PE-1848-97 6. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount . estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements. construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. The applicant should be advised that individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. 8. The applicant shall dedicate right of way for the extension of Edgerton Court. Dedication for Edgerton Court shall include applicable right of way for a standard cul de sac. Additional dedication of right of way shall include the applicable radius at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Center Road. 9. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Edgerton Court which is to be constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of 28-30 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 10. The County Engineer has designated a Collector Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Mission Avenue which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 8.5 to 10.5 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 11. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane rounty Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 95-0498, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 12. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 13. The County Arterial Road plan identifies Mission Avenue as a 70 foot Collector Arterial. The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that a strip of property 5 feet in width along the Mission Avenue frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Mission Avenue. 14. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to niake arrangements for any necessary work. ! Page 3 09/25/1997 PE-1848-97 15. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. Kimball, Sandy From: Hemmings, Biil Sent: Friday, September 19, 1997 10:04 AM To: Jones, Tammy Cc: Harper, Pat; Franz, Dean; Kimbail, Sandy; Engelhard, Scott; Pederson, John Subject: P-1848-97 - Bradley Heights & ZE-54-97 - Jim Mahar Importance: High 9-19-97 I received the above referenced project application on Sept. 19, 1997. The SCS Soils Map identifies this area as being Garrison Gravely Loam soils. The soil survey in this area is known to be accurate. Therefore, since this is an approved soil for stormwater disposal, no concept drainage plan is required. We have no information that says there are any critical areas on this site. I consider this proposal to be technically complete. I recommend using the standard drainage condition. Page 1 PAGE 1 14:25:10 16 SEP 1997 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 03046 MISSION AV (START) 00.000 COUNTRY VISTA DR R 08 PAVED 50 MISSION AVE (E1VD) 00.230 SIGNAL RD (END) R 08 PAVED 50 MISSION AV 00.410 HOMESTEAD DR (END) R 08 PAVED 50 MISSION AVE 00.460 MADSON ST R 08 PAVED 50 MISSION AV 00.720 MOLTER RD (LIBERTY L R 08 LIGHT BITUM. 22 01.220 SIMPSON RD (LIBERTY R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26 02.860 CHASE RD (START) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26 MISSION (NEW END) 03.030 IDAHO R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26 MISSION AV (END) 03.100 IDAHO RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 26 03042 MISSION AV (START) 00.000 FANCHER FRONTAGE RD U 17 PAVED 20 MISSION AV 00.490 THIERMAN ST (END) U 17 PAVED 20 00.620 BRADLEY RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 00.770 LILY RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 00.930 BOWMAN RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 00.990 PARK RD U 17 PAVED 20 01.110 CENTER RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 01.130 CENTER RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 01.230 ELLA RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 01.270 ELLA RD (START) U 17 PAVED 20 01.290 ELTON RD (END) U 17 PAVED 20 M I S S I ON AV ( END ) 01.510 V I S TA RD (S TART ) U 17 PAVED 20 03043 MISSION AV (START) 00.000 VISTA RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22 MISSION AV 00.120 BESSIE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22 00.250 SARGENT RD U 17 PAVED 22 00.370 MARGUERITE RD (END) U 17 PAVED 22 00.510 ARGONNE RD (ONE WAY U 16 PAVED 44 00.560 MULLAN RD (ONE WAY N U 16 PAVED 44 00.660 WILLOW RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36 00.760 LOCUST RD U 16 PAVED 36 00.900 FARR RD U 16 PAVED 36 01.010 WOODRUFF RD U 16 PAVED 36 01.140 HERALD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36 01.260 FELTS RD U 16 PAVED 36 01.390 R.AYMOND RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36 01.410 OBERLIN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36 01.500 UNIVERSITY RD U 16 PAVED 36 01.670 GLENN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36 01.750 PIERCE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36 01.950 WOODWARD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 36 02.020 BOWDISH RD U 16 PAVED 36 02.060 BATES RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36 , 02.140 WILBUR RD U 16 PAVED 36 02.290 UNION RD (START) U 16 PAVED 36 02.510 SR-27 (PINES RD) U 16 PAVED 50 02.650 HOUK RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50 02.720 HOUK RD (START) U 16 PAVED 50 02.760 VERCLER RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50 02.900 WOODLAWN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 50 03.030 MCDONALD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 03.280 BLAKE RD U 16 PAVED 22 03.400 MAMER RD U 16 PAVED 22 03.520 EVERGREEN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 03.650 BOLIVAR RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 03.790 BEST RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 03.880 REES CT (END) U 16 PAVED 22 04.050 ADAMS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 PAGE 2 14:25:12 16 SEP 1997 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 04.130 MARCUS RD (E1VD ) U 16 PAVED 22 04.170 BURNS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 04.320 PROGRESS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 04.380 ST CHARLES RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 04.540 CATALDO AV (END) U 16 PAVED 22 . MISSION AV (END) 04.590 SULLIVAN RD 03045 MISSION AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO FLORA RD U 19 GRAVEL 20 MISSION AV 00.280 FLORA RD U 19 GR.AVEL 20 MISSION AVE 00.430 ARC ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 MISSION AV 00.770 LONG RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.870 ARTIES ST (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.030 GREENACRES RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.270 BARKER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 20 01.390 HARMONY LN 1600(PRIV U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 01.670 GR.ADY RD ( END ) U 17 L I GHT B I TUM . 18 01.730 HODGES RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 01.790 ALADDIN RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 01.850 CAVALIER RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 02.050 HOLL RD (END) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 02.160 GLENBROOK RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 MISSION AV (END) 03.260 HARVARD RD (START) R 08 GRAVEL 30 03047 MISSION RD (START) 00.000 LINCOLN COUNTY LINE R 09 GR.AVEL 18 MISSION RD 00.570 RR TRACKS R 09 GRADED/DRAINED 10 NiISSION RD (END) 01.030 STROUP RD R 09 GR.ADED/DRAINED 10 03049 MISSION RD (START) 00.000 FLINT RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 MISSION RD 00.500 OLD TRAILS RD (START R 09 GR.AVEL 20 01.060 DENO RD ( START ) R 09 GR.AVEL 20 MISSION RD (END) 02.150 GROVE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 20 03048 MISSION RD (START) 00.000 WOOD RD R 09 GR.AVEL 12 MISSION RD (END) 01.000 RITCHEY RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 12 7 Records Processed PAGE 1 14:25:56 16 SEP 1997 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 00706 CENTER DR (START) 00.000 BEVERLY DR U 19 GR.AVEL 28 CENTER DR 00.100 SKYLINE DR (END) U 19 GRAVEL 28 00.210 HIGHLAND DR (END) U 19 GR.AVEL 28 00.270 lOTH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40 CENTER DR (END) 00.370 lOTH AVE NORTH TO EN U 19 PAVED 40 00554 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 59TH AV (END) U 19 GR.AVEL 14 CENTER RD 00.400 ELECTRI C AV ( END U 19 GR.AVEL 14 CENTER RD (END) 00.410 53ED AV (END) U 19 GRAVEL 14 00555 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 MISSION AV U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD 00.060 AUGUSTA AV (START) U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD (END) 00.120 NORA AV U 19 PAVED 36 00557 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 SR 290 (TRENT) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 CENTER RD 00.270 MARIETTA AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 00.330 BUCKEYE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 CENTER RD (END) 00.480 UTAH AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 00558 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 RUTTER AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 CENTER RD 00.070 EUCLID AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00.200 LIBERTY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00.320 GLASS AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00.450 KIERNAN AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 CENTER RD (END) 00.510 SOUTH RIVERWAY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00561 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 US HWY 2 R 09 GR.AVEL 20 CENTER ST 00.090 CHERRY ST (MEAD) (EN R 09 GR.AVEL 20 CENTER RD 00.330 OAK ST (END) R 09 GRAVEL 20 00.500 SHERIDAN ST(NONESTAB R 09 GRAVEL 20 00.580 FREYA ST ( MEAD ) (END R 09 GR.AVEL 20 00.800 MARKET ST R 09 GR.AVEL 20 00.850 BOSTON RD (MEAD)(STA R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.980 CUBA CT R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 CENTER S'1' 01.030 MIAMI CT R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 CENTER RD (END) 01.110 YALE RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00703 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END TO SINTO A U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD 00.020 SINTO AV U 19 PAVED 36 00.080 MAXWELL AV U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD (END) 00.130 MISSION AV U 19 PAVED 36 00556 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 INDIANA AV U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD (END) 00.080 RAILROAD AV U 19 PAVED 36 00559 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 UPRIVER DR U 19 PAVED 26 CENTER RD (END) 00.280 ELLA RD U 19 PAVED 26 00699 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 SHADY SLOPE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 18 CENTER RD (END) 00.080 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 GR.AVEL 18 00789 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 BALDWIN AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40 CENTER RD (END) 00.040 INDIANA AV U 19 PAVED 40 00717 CENTER ST (START) 00.000 WEST END TO STEVENS R 09 PAVED 36 CENTER ST 00.040 STEVENS ST R 09 PAVED 36 00.100 WASHINGTON CT (START R 09 PAVED 36 00.160 WHITEHOUSE ST R 09 PAVED 36 CENTER ST (END) 00.300 MILL RD R 09 PAVED 56 00560 CENTER ST (START) 00.000 PITTSBURG ST R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 CENTER ST (END) 00.240 CRESTLINE ST (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 30 13 Records Processed PAGE 1 14:26:20 16 SEP 1997 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 00706 CENTER DR (START) 00.000 BEVERLY DR U 19 GR.AVEL 28 CENTER DR 00.100 SKYLINE DR (END) U 19 GRAVEL 28 00.210 HIGHLAND DR (END) U 19 GR.AVEL 28 00.270 lOTH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40 CENTER DR (END) 00.370 lOTH AVE NORTH TO EN U 19 PAVED 40 00554 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 59TH AV (END) U 19 GRAVEL 14 CENTER RD 00.400 ELECTRIC AV (END) & U 19 GRAVEL 14 CENTER RD (END) 00.410 53ED AV (END) U 19 GRAVEL 14 00555 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 MISSION AV U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD 00.060 AUGUSTA AV (START) U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD (END) 00.120 NORA AV U 19 PAVED 36 00557 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 SR 290 (TRENT) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 CENTER RD 00.270 MARIETTA AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 00.330 BUCKEYE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 CENTER RD (END) 00.480 UTAH AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18 00558 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 RUTTER AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 CENTER RD 00.070 EUCLID AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00.200 LIBERTY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00.320 GLASS AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00.450 KIERNAN AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 CENTER RD (END) 00.510 SOUTH RIVERWAY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 16 00561 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 US HWY 2 R 09 GR.AVEL 20 CENTER ST 00.090 CHERRY ST (MEAD) {EN R 09 GR.AVEL 20 CENTER RD 00.330 OAK ST (END) R 09 GRAVEL 20 00.500 SHERIDAN ST(NONESTAB R 09 GR.AVEL 20 00.580 FREYA ST (MEAD) (END R 09 GRAVEL 20 00.800 MARKET ST R 09 GRAVEL 20 00.850 BOSTON RD (MEAD)(STA R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00.980 CUBA CT R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 CENTER ST 01.030 MIAMI CT R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 CENTER RD (END) 01.110 YALE RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 20 00703 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END TO SINTO A U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD 00.020 SINTO AV U 19 PAVED 36 00.080 MAXWELL AV U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD (END) 00.130 MISSION AV U 19 PAVED 36 00556 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 INDIANA AV U 19 PAVED 36 CENTER RD (END) 00.080 RAILROAD AV U 19 PAVED 36 00559 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 UPRIVER DR U 19 PAVED 26 CENTER RD (END) 00.280 ELLA RD U 19 PAVED 26 00699 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 SHADY SLOPE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 18 CENTER RD (END) 00.080 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 GR.AVEL 18 00789 CENTER RD (START) 00.000 BALDWIN AV (END) U 19 PAVED 40 CENTER RD (END) 00.040 INDIANA AV U 19 PAVED 40 00717 CENTER SAm (START) 00.000 WEST END TO STEVENS R 09 PAVED 36 CENTER ST 00.040 STEVENS ST R 09 PAVED 36 00.100 WASHINGTON CT (START R 09 PAVED 36 00.160 WHITEHOUSE ST R 09 PAVED 36 CENTER ST (END) 00.300 MILL RD R 09 PAVED 56 00560 CENTER ST (START) 00.000 PITTSBURG ST R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 22 CENTER ST (END) 00.240 CRESTLINE ST (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM. 30 13 Records Processed NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet . YOU AREt HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS I+~OLLOWS: APPlication: File No.PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97, Preliminary Plat to divide approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for single family residences with Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). Hearing Date and Time: December 3, 1997 10:30 a.m. Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Applicant/Owner: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. Owner's Designated Contact: David Evans & Associates c/o John Konen, 110 W. Cataldo, Spokane, WA. 99201, (509) 327-8697. Address and Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue and between Center Road and Edgerton Court within the SW %4 of S. 7, T. 25 N., R. 44 EWM. Comprehensive Plan: Urban. Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued by the County Division of Building and Planning, as the lead agency. The official comment period ends 12-1-97. Deaclline for submitting SEPA Appeal: [note: only applies to administrative appeals to the Hearing Examiner, not to initial applications such as rezones or preliminary plats] Related Permits: None Division of Building & Planning Staff: Tammy Jones, (509) 456-3675 HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing wi11 be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of tlle Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearing wiil be conducted in facilities which are physically accessible to persons with disabilities. Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, ls' Floor Permit Center'West, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spolcane, WA, 99260, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 456-3675. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn: Tammy Jones, PE- 1848-97/ZE-54-97. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3` Floor, PLiblic Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spolcane, WA, 99260-0245. DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL, JA11Ei S L. MANSON, DII2E CTOR WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NUMBER(S): PE-1848-97/ZE-54-97 .DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Preliminary Plat to divide approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for single family residences with Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). APPLICANT/OWNER: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. 8121 E. Maringo Spokane, WA. 99212 (509) 891-8837 OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: David Evans & Associates c/o John Konen, 110 W. Cataldo Spokane, WA. 99201 (509) 327-8697 LOCATION OT PROPOSAL: Generally located nortli of and adjacent to Mission Avenue and between Center Road and Edgerton Court within the SW '/4 of Section 7, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM. I,EAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISIUN OF BUILDING AND PLANNING DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and otlier information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., December 1, 1997, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be sent to the contact person listed belativ. By: Tammy Jones Title: Associate Planner Phone: (509) 456-3675 Address: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P) West 1026 Broadway Spokane, VVA 99260 DATE ISSUED: ~'v U•~ , 1997 SIGNATUltE: CtLIPdy U U COMMEN'['S REGARDING ENVIRONMS~TTAL CONCF.RNS ARE WELCOME AT THE IiEARTNG. APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COLJNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 1 st Floor, West 1026 Broadway, Spolcane, WA 99260. Tlie appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to malte specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper _ 3. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red ' 4. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderb,y 5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6. Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski 7. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley 8. Spokane County Boundary Review Board; Susan Wincheil 9. Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glenn Miles 10. Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston 11. WA State Department of Transportation; Mark Rowher 12. Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer 13. Fire Protection District No. 1 14. West Valley School District No. 363 15. Spokane County Water District No.3 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: File No. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making declsions. An Environmenta! Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals signiflcant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. 7he purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help ihe agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basfc information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparalion of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases , you should be able to answer lhe questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you realiy do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Comptete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmentat regulations, such as zoning, shareline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the govemmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to ail parts of your proposal, even If you plan to do them over a period of time or on difference parcets of lend. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional intormation reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impaci. Use of checklist for non-proJect proposa(s: Complete this checklist for rtort-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property ar site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if appliCablB: Bradley Heights, a revised preliminary plat of 17 single family lots. tAv ~ ► U ~ . g 2. Name of Applicant: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: e121 E. Maringo, spokane, wA 99212, (509) 891-8837, cell 879-3995 4. Date Checklist Prepared: May 30, 1997 5. AgenCy requesting cheCkllst: Spokane County, Division of Building and Planning 6. Proposed timing or schedute (including phasing, if applicable): Spring, 1998 7. a. Do you have any plans for future addit(ons, expansion, or further activity related to or connected to this proposal? If yes, explain. No. The 3.7 acre site is the only property owned by the applicant in this area. b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain: No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directty related to this proposal: Test holes were dug to determine the feasibility of on-site sewage disposal systems. The project will be served by a public sewer system extended to the site by Spokane County iltilities. Traffic counts and level of service calculations were completed at Park Road and Mission Avenue by David Evans and Associates, Inc. Rev. 2/1188 1 A. BACKGROUND (continued) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property cavered by your proposal If yes, explain. Public sewer systems are currently being extended to serve the neighborhaod including the preliminazy plat area. Water systems are being upgraded in conjuncCion with sewer extensions. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if knOwn: Preliminary plat revision and zone change to UR-7, County Hearing Examiner; roadway and drainage plans, Spokane County Engineer's Department; final plat, Spokane County. All lots fronting on Mission Avenue and Center Road have been stubbed for sewer and water. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, inGuding the proposed uses and the size of the praject and site. (There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.) The applicant proposes to subdivide a 3.7 acre parcel on the floor of the Spokane Valley fnCo 17 aingle family lots having a minimum of 65 feet of frontage and an area of 6,600 sq. feet. Eleven of the lots will front on existing street systems (Mission Avenue and CenCer Road) while 6 lots will be served by extending Edgerton Court south. The applicant is requesting UR-7 zoning and - preliminary plat of Bradley Heights to accomplish the subdivision. 12. Location of the proposai. Give significant informatlon for a person to understand the preclse location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provid a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps ar detafled plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. The site Is located at the northwest corner of Missfon Avenue and Center Road approximately one block east of Park Road and 3 blocks north of IntersCate 90 in the six of Section 7, TWP 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. A complere legal description accompanies the application. , 13. Does the proposed action Ife within the Aquffer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area (ASA)? The City of Spakane? (see: Spokane Counly's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries): The site ie within the ASA, the GSSA, and the PSSA, but outeide the City limits oE Spokane. Spokane County Utilitfes is currently extending sewer to the neighborhood. TO BE COMPLF,TED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: Flat b. What is the steepest slope on fhe site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (i.e., clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know ihe classification of agricultural soits, specify and note any prime farmland: Garrison gravelly loam, GgA, a glacial outwash sail typical of Spokane Valley floor. d. Are there surtace indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, desCribe: No. The site is on the floor of the Spokane Valley. ' J Rev. 2I1/88 2 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for Agency Use Onty e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate sOUrCe of fill. Vezy little fill material will be required because most of the lots front on established residential streets. `+U f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construcifon, or use? If so, generally describe: No. Construction activities for the plat will be limited to improvements to existing street (Mission Avenue) and the extension of Edgerton Court approximately 150 feet south of the existing terminus. g. About what percent af the site will be covered with impervlous surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings): . Approximately 25t of the sfte will be covered with impervious surfaces after construction of reaidences, garages and driveways. v~•~ . 4WIA h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Constrvction activities will conform to Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority requirements. v 2. AIR , a. Whai type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (such as dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known: During conatruction some dust will be produced fram excavation activities. The completed project will feature paved streets, improved driveways and lawn areas. b. Are there any offsite sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, If So, generally describe: The site is three blocks north oE I-90 and f ive blocks south of Trent Avenue and the Burlington Northern Railroa;l. Surroundfng uses are residential. • c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the air, if any: Conformance to S.C.A.P.C.A. requirements during construction. Any wood stoves will coroply with State emisaion standards. 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surlace water body on or In the immedlate vicinity of the site Including year round and seasonal streams, saitwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into: No. The site is 1-1/2 miles south of the Spokane River. A gravel pit extends into the Spokane Aquifer approximately 1/2-mile southwest of the site. (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, describe and attach availabte plans: No. Rev. 2/1/88 3 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for Agency Use Only (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from ~ the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: ~ None. ~)9f.VY1 dol &V l, L~ . !MI (4) Witl the proposal require surface water wiihdrawals or diversions? Give a general description, purpose, and approx(mate quantities, if known: No. All drainage will be confined to the adjoining street syetem and to the culdesac extension as part of required road improvements. (5) Does the proposal Ife within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note location on the site plan. No. (6) Does the proposal invofve an discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and antlcipated volume of discharge. No. The site is well removed from surface water bodies. B. Ground: (1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be dlscharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantlties, if known. No. The site will be served by the public water system currently serving the adjofning residential neighborhood. Stormwater facilities will comply with °208" design standards. Spokane County is currently extending a public sewer system to serve the nefghborhood which will include the infill plat proposed. (2) Oescribe waste material that will be dischargod into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or lhe number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. Each of the 17 lots will utilize the public sewer system being extended to the area. (3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharg(ng fluids below the ground surface (inctudes systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe ihe type of system, lhe amount af material to be disposed of through the system, and the types of materials Iikely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). Stormwater facilities will be designed and installed in accordance with "2080 requirements. Sewer lines are being extended by Spokane County to serve the area. (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic sotvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- , ground or underground storage tanks? if so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? No. This is a single family residential proposal. Rev. 2/1/88 4 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only (5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures ' to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3))? None. Thie is a single family residential proposal. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal if any (1nclude quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is relatively flat with established streets on two sides. Improvements to existing streets will require installation of storm- water syaCeme complying with "208" standards. The extension of Edgerton Court will also require 0208" stormwater design and installations. (2) Will any chemicats be stored, handled, ar used on the site in a location where a spill or leak wiil drain to surface or groundwater or to a storrnwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? - No. This is a single family residential project. (3) Could waste materiats enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. This is a sfngle family residential project with very limited potentials for waste materials to enter ground or surface waters. . d. Proposed measuras to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed actlon lles within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanatlons relating to facilities conceming Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist): The afte will be served by public water and public sewer eysCems. Storm water drainage will conform to 1208" requirements. 4. PLANTS a. Circle type of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. shrubs. x grass. • pasture. crop or grain. wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skink cabbage, other. water ptants: water liily, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation. b. What kind and amount of vegetation wiil be removed or altered: Vegetation adjoining established public streets will be removed to accorrunodate required street improvements. Aa each lot ia converted dw ~~~1 to a housing site, the vegetation will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the slte: None are known. The site is within an urbanized area. 1 . ' d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: IJone is contemplated. ~I Rev. 2/1/88 5 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluatlon for Agency Use Oniy 5• ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Small mammals. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:. ~ fish: bass, satmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: other: ' b. List any threatened or endangered specles known to be on or near the site. None are known. The project is within an established urban area. c. Is the site part of a migration route7 If so, explain: No. The site is located on the developed floor of the Spokane valley. , d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: l~' ~ None. ~ . ~ 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the campleted projecYs energy nesds? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used for lighting, mechanical operation, water heating and space heating. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generalty describe: Fourteen of the progosed lota are well removed from established residences. Three of the lots would be located along the north edge of the afte adjoining existing residences. These three sites could have a higher raof elevation than existing residences to the north. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the pians of this proposat? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The praject will comply with applicable energy codes adopted by Spokane County. 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, inciuding exposure to toxic chemica(s, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. This is a single family resfdential proposal. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None are anticipated. Rev. 2/1/88 6 ~ ~ B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (coniinued) Evaluation for Agency Use Onty (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. The project will comply with applicable buildings, fire, safety and energy codes. b. Noise: (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for exampie, traffic, equipment operation, other? This is a single family neighborhood located on the floor of the Spokane Valley with Interstate 90 located three blocks south and the Burlington Northern Railroad mainline five blocks north. (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a tong-tenn basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other). Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction noise will be produced by equipment operation. The9e activities will be confined to daytime hours. The completed project will have noiae levels comparable to the adjoining established residential neighborhood. , (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. None. 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE • a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent propeRies? The site is vacant. Adjoining uses are primarily single family residencea with the exception of an apartment house to the southwest, duplexes to the southwest, and vacant properties and a school Eronting on Park Road. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 'rhe surrounding area is urbanized with single family homes. Agricultural activities may have occurred before the 1950's. c. Describe any structures on the site. None. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? No. e. What are the current zoning classifications of the site: trtt 3. 5, single family residentfal zone allowing single famfly homea on 10,000 sq. feet lots with 80 feet of frontaqe. The propased zones, UR-7, will allow single family residences to be established on lots with 65 feet of frontage and less area for loCS. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site: Urban. This project would allow infill of single family residences. g. If applicable, what Is the current shoreline master program designation of the site: N/A h. Has any part of the slte been classified as an "environmentally sensitive: area? If so, specify: No. The project is within an urbanized area. 1. Approximately how many people wouid reside or work in the completed project? Approx. 40 to 45 people would live in the 17 completed home sftes. Rev. 2/1/88 7 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only j. Approximately how many people would the complete project displace? None. A, k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: None 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: New single family homes will be constructed at a quality level meeting and in most cases exceeding existing housing in the vicinity. Nine of the lote will contain approximately 10,000 SF of area while the remaining eight lota fronting on Mission Avenue, a neighborhood arterial will contain approximately 6,600 SF of area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. The project will expand the inventory of middle income housing common to the established neighborhood. b. Approximatefy how many units, if any, would be eliminated? lndicate whether high-, middle- or low-income housing: None. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. The project wfll comp2y with applfcable buiZding code requiremente. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tailest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? 1Nhat is the princlpai exterior building material(s) proposed? The zoning code provides for a maximum building height of 35 feet in the proposed UR-7 zone. Residences to be constructed on the site will be typically one- and two-stories in height. b. What views in fhe immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. The project is located within a built up single family residential area in the Spokane Valley. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. The project will comply with applicable building code requirements. Drainage swale areas will be maintained in grass cover ' 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light will be confined to entrfes and patio areas of single family homes. ' b. Could light or glare from the finished product be a safety hazard or interfere with views7 No. c. What existing offsite sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? None. d. Proposal measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. The residences will use reaidential lighting ffxtures. Rev. 2/1 /88 8 . , . r B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only 12. RECREATION a. What deslgnated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate viclnity? ~ The site is located 1/4-mile north of Spokane County Park and pool facilities at Park Road south of Interstate 90. b. Wouid the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. The site is an undeveloped parcel. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be provided by the praject or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on or proposed for national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to lhe site? If so, generally describe. No. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control Impacts, if any: If artifacts are discovered during construction, the Spokane County Historic Preservation Office will be notified per County Code. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show onsite plans, if any. The site fronts on Mission Avenue, Center Road and Edgerton Road which are residential streets. The local street network fs well established in the area. The site is one block east of Park Road, an arterial. Missfon is designated as a collector arterial. b. Is slte currently served by public transit? If not, what is ihe approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Transit service fa available at Broadway and Park and at Park and Trent which are about 1/2 mile from the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project nave? How many would the project eliminate? Each residence would accommodate at least 2 automobile parkfng apaces in garage and driveway configurations. , d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The project will require widening at Mission Avenue adjoining the site and the extension of•the Edgerton Court culdesac to the south. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generaliy describe. No. The site is 1/4-mile south of the Burlington Northern Railroad mainline. , r Rev. 2/1188 9 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Oniy f. How many vehicular trips per day woutd be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak would occur. The completed project will produce approximately 160 to 170 new vehicular trips per day on the local street system conforming to normal peak hour characteristica. Approximately 60% of this new traffic will use Park Rosd for access to the arterial sCreet system. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Adjofning streets will be wfden to conform to Spokane County standards. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for pubtic service (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The addition of 17 new residences to the neighborhood will place incremental demands for establiahed public servfces including fire protectfon, police protection and schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or controi direct impacts on public services, if any: The infill development will allow more efficient utilization of existing aervices including increased tax revenuea from sales and property taxes. The proposed density of 4.6 units per acre will improve the affordability of sewer systems being extended to the aerve the area. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currentiy available at the site: electrfcity, natural gas, water, refuse servfce, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and . the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water and Sewer-City of Spokane Electricity and Natural gas-wv7P Water-Spokane County Water District No. 3 Telephone-U.S. West Refuse-valley Garbage Sewer-Spokane County C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, shoutd there by any willful misrepresentatlon of wiliful lack of full dfsclosure on my.part, the agency may withdraw any determfnatlon of nonsigniflcance that (t might issue in relianf on this checktist. Date: SePtember 3, 1997. ProPone t Name (P Q- i, r~ - G, Proponent Signature: Address: na I ~~'Ia2l~rt U City/State/Zip: t .(C. i/ y Phone: f549L27-8697 v ~ Person Completing Fo :~,hn D. Konen. David Evans asd Assogiates. Inc. Date: September 3, 1997 FOR STAFF USE ONLY- Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: 411rif IL4 1 4;Based on thi staff review of the environmental checklist d er pertinent information, the sttaff: A. _Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts antl recommends a determination of nonsignificance. B. _ Concludes that probable significant environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated determtnation of nonsignificance wfth conditions. C. _,Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends determination of significance. Filing Fee $75.00 Rev. 2/1/88 10 • - - ~ 5301 . ; ' . S?0__<_ANE COUN'7Y __3____.ANN__NG. PRE:LIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE IZECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION . PART I A. GENrRAL INTORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. MAlL1NG ADDRESS: 8121 E. Maringo , ' CITY: Spokane STATC: WA ZIP: 99212 PHONC: (509) 891-8837 (work) (509) 891-8837 (home) PF}p^-i ~ T(ON T'OR IT' APl'LICANT IS NOT T'i-Ir OWNFR, 1NCIaUnT WRITTTN OWNCR AUT1•iORT A ~ APPLICANT TO Si;RVE AS RrPRTSrNTATIVT. I.rGALOWNER'SNAMF: Jim Mahar PI-IONE: (509) 891-8837 MAILING ADDRCSS: 8121 E. Maringo, Spokane, washington 99212 1'ROJCCT/PROI'OSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq.R.): 3.7 acres AD.IACE-NT ARrA OWNCD OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. R.): None ASSESSOR I'ARCCL NS Of I'ROJECT/PROPOSAL: 45073 . 0505 ASSESSOR PARCEL #S Or ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED N/A STRrET ADDRCSS 4F PROPOSAL N. W. corner, Mission Avenue and Center Road EXiSTING ZONE CLnSSIrICnT10N(S) (DATE rSTAI3LISI-IEn) UR 3.5 (1991) , EXISTING USC OF PROPCRTY Vacant PROPOSED ZONING UR-7 , COMPREHCNSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCf-TOOL DTSTRICT west Valley School District #363 • FIRC DiSTRiCT Spokane valley FD 41 WATER PURVEYOR SPK/Co. Water Dist 3 i'ROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Siiigle family dwellings (x) Duplexes O Multi-family dwellings O Mixed Use O Manufactured homes ( ) I3usiness ( ) Industriai ( ) Otlier ( ) Describe: . , - LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DCPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING TI-IIS I'ROPERTY: PE-1760-95, ' a preliminary plat of 12 single family lots, November 16, 1995. B. LrCAL/ZONr RE CLASSIFICATION INFORnIATION: I.OCATION Of PROPOSAL: N.W. corner of Niission Avenue and Center Road. SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 25 N RANGC 44 E. w. M. NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCCSS: Mission Avenue, Center Road, and Edgerton Road. , W1DTH OF PROPCRTY f RONTING ON PUBLIC RO/1n: 896 f t. . DOCS TF(E PROPOSnL WAVC ACCCSS TO AN nRTCRinL OR PLANNCD nRTCRIAL (x) YES O NO N/1MC(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Mission A-zenue, a collector arterial. 4 . SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSiFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 LCGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal descrirtian stamped by Land Surveyor). tNCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR EN7'1RE AREA TO i3E SU[iDiV1Df:D ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP AND REQUCSTED ZONING FOR EACH LOT AND B1_OCK FOR MULTIPLE ZONE REQUESTS. See attached legal description. IF YOU DO NOT FIOLD TfTLC TO TI-lE I'ROPCRTY, WHAT 1S YOUR 1NTCREST IN IT? Applicant holds title to property. WHAT ARE THE CI-IANGED CONDITION S OF THC nREA WI-IiCFi YOU FECL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Spokane County is in the process of extending public sewer services to the area. The site is within the I.U.G.A. WHAT IMPACT WIL[, TI-]E PROPQSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATiON HAVE ON TI-iE ADJACENT PROPERTICS? None. This is an infill plat of 17 single family lots. W[-TAT T'ACTORS SUPPORT TWE ZONE RFCLASSt['ICATION? 1) Public Sewer System extensions 2) Located within I.U.G.A. 3) Fronts on collector arterial. WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSC TO M1TIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? None. The project is an infill residential subdivision. C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CENTRAL INI'ORMATION: NUMBER OF LOTS 17 GROSS AREA 3.7 acres TYPiCAL LOT S(2E; 6, 681aqft10, 232sqft PROi'QSED NET DENSITY* 4.86 lots/acre SMnLLESTLOTSIZE 6,681 sq. ft MINIMUM FRONTAGC: 65.5 ft PR4POSCD SOURCE OF WATCR: Iiidividual Wells O I'ublic System (x) Private Communiry System O Other ( ) Describe: PROPOSED MEANS Or SEWAGE DISPOSAL T'ublic Sewer (x) Community System O Sertic tank anci drainfieid O Double Plumbing Dry Sewer Otiier Describe: UTiLiTY COMPANICS AND/OR D1STRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THfS PROPbSAL: Electricity: W. W. P. Sewer: Spokane County Gas: w. W. P. Water: SPO Water Dist #3 Plione: US West DO YOU, OR TF1E OWNCR iN TI-1E EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN ThI(S PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR rUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS, OR T'URTHCR ACTIVITY REi.ATED TO THiS PROPOSAL? YES NO (X) IF YES, EXPLAIN: ' D. P-RELiM1NARY SUBDIVISION iNPROVFMENT 1NFORMATIO~, LBVCL OF STREET iMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads I'tiblic roads ( x) Arteriaf roads Tract X roads DC'SCRi(3E ANY COMt31NnTiON Of Ai30VC: N/A . ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD CXPECTED T'OR COMPLETC DEVE[,OPMCNT OF TEiE SUI3D(ViS(ON: Fa11 1998 IS I'FIASING OP Tt-iE FINALI7ATION OF Ti-lE SUBDIVISION PROPOSCD? Yes O No ( X) IF YES, SHOW PHASiNG ON TI-IE PRELiMiNARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USr CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.) ? Yes O No ( x) 1F YES, DESCRIBE: *NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE M1NUS PRiVATE AND/OR PUI3LIC ROAD ARF/l. Page aUi3nIVIS10N AND ZONE RECLASSIrIC/\I'ION AP1'LiCATION 3 of ~ PART lt TI-IIS SECTION Of T111: /1PI'LIC/1TION W1L1, f'ROVInE Tf-Ir, D1ViSION Or- BUILDiNG /1N[) PL/1NNING ST/1rF WI'fFi WR(TTCN VERIr1CnTlON "I'l InT Tl-II: nl'1'LICANT (-1AS I-IAD PRCL1MINnRY CONSl1L"I'nTION WITI-{ TI-1C nGENCiFS IDCNTIFtEn. RESULTS OF TI-1L PRELIMINnRY CONSULTATION St-1ALL 13E 1NCORT'ORATED IN TFiC f'ROf'OSA1. BCFORC FINAL SU[3MITTAL 'I'O TI-(C DIVISION Of i3UIL171NG AND i'I.nNNING. ~ ■ E J ( J DISTIUM- A. TI-1lS i'ROPOSAL IS WITI-11N fiRC i'ROTECTION DISTRfCTNO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGCMENTS (HAV[;) ((IAVI: NOT) I3Ef;N MADC TO MCET OUR NCEDS 1N PROVIDING FOR AN ADFQUATC W11TER SYS1'CM AND FnCi[.ITIES rOR f IRC 1'ROTCCTION f'URPOSCS. ~ ; OR UN/1Bl.C TO CALC(.1LATENOW C. 1tLCOMMf NDED FIltf: FLOW: 773 i3ECnUSE USC IS NO'T DEFINITIVE.; AND WILL BE DCTf:RMINEU A'T 13UILDING I'CRMIT n('['LICATtON TIME. ^ D. REQUiRCMENTS INC1_UDC: '780 ScFP'.~ r FIRE D1STRICT SIGNnTURf:/7'I"f'LC DA1'(: • fjac-t.a CA.a~ 9-~ p a U , WATER 19JRVEVOR S3G, OIZ I A. SAT(SFACTORY ARRANGC'MENTS FOR DOMf.?ST1C WATFR AND T'IRF T'LOW RECIUIRCMCNTS (liikieli) (IIAVE NOT) i3CGN MAnL. , B. RFQUIRCMEN1'S/C4Mfv1C'NTS: A UVATEA MRIIY FXTE-N S/ON WJGL 13E- I?x--~Ut Rr-- b ; sP o KhNE CouwY W A"f ER o 1s-T K ~ 3 - WnTCR D1STRiCT IGNATURC/'TITLC DA'T[: COUNPI'V K , ; E ' A I'RI:LIMINARY DISCUSSION FIAS TAKCN f'LACf: AND GCNCRAL RCQUIRLMENTS T'OR ROADS AND DRAINAGL' 1-IAVE RCCN DISCUSSCD WITFI Ti•IC At'I'LICANT. A. COMMCNTS: t . . 1 \ 1 1'~._w ~-t. 1~? V SIGNA f 12f!"f fL~ ~ ~ r.r:... t2e d- y S(,3 G d a L :S- /1 PREI..IMINARY DISCUSSION 1-1nS TAKCN PLACr, AND GENCRAL RCQUIRE-MCNTS FOR SUf3MITTnI., Or TI-IIS 1'ROPOSAI., (HAVT;) (I-IAVI: NnT) I3CGN SATiSFiCD. '('1-1rL Dl---SIGNATf'D WATER PURV1'sYOR FOR TI•lIS S1Tr lS A. COMMCNTS: _C00YZbt1~ ATE~ , U~r ' OATErL -RakvEV-C ~ ~ 91'=NATURCEt r-~- ~OTOEI---'!- A ~ ~7 ~lTITLi: ~ PRE-LIM1NnRY DiSCUSS( - LACl: AND GrNERAL REQUIRCMCNTS T'OR SUDMITTAL OI' TI IIS T'ROPOS/1L (th4~ (IIAVC O' _ rfN SATISfi[:D. A. COMMCNTS: ~ - . SfGNA`('URf /`i' ' 'LC DA W- us`e. 3 o o , s ; , ' n T'RCLIMINARY DISCUSSION i-1AS T/1KCN PLnCf: AND GENCRAL REQUIREMCNTS FOR TT-(C PROVISION OI' 13Ui3LIC SCWER ARf-_ UNDCRS'T'OOD D T(-1E APPLICANT. A. COMMCNTS: ODOOEd--r TO ~E~~~ ~ ~~E P-3 . ~ ~ e ~ ~o ~ rcNn, ruRCn-rri_c n~r~~ , SUI3n1VISION AND ZONC RCCL/1SS1F1C11TION A1'I'LICnT10N Page 4 of 4 l'ART Iii SURVCYOIt VCRIFICATION I, TI-li: UNDERSIGNCD, n LICCNSCn LAND SURVEYOR, i-1/1VrL COMI'[.ETGD THE INf'ORM/1TION RCQUf:STGD ANU TI-IE ZONING MAP, I,CGnL DCSCRIPTION, AND f'RCLIMINARY f'L/1T 1-IAVC 13CCN PRCI'ARCD DY ME OR UNDCR MY f'ERVISION 1 CCORDnNCE WITI-I T(-IC REQUIRCMENTS Of TFIT: SPOKANE COUNTY 70N1 U[3T~IV( N R' UL ONS nND Ti-lI: LAWS O1' Tl-lTs STATC Of . Wn S i-I (NGTON. SIGNCD: n/1TE: 9 7 nDDRCSS: (.//.-O-ST /!0 (,if-mc.vc, f'1-IONT:: .,Z 7-06~9 -7 Le Z .-j e-zIP: ~ PART IV (SiGNATURE OF t'ROPCRTY OWNERS OR LETTFR OF AUTI-TOR17_ATION) 1, TI-IE UNnCRSiGNED, SWCAR OR AFf1RM UNDCR PCNnLTY OF PERJURY TI-1AT THG ADOV1: RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUT1-1FULLY /1ND TO 1'I-if: (3CS'T' 0F MY KNOWLGUGC. 1 rURTI-IER SWFAR OR APfIRM TI4AT I AM TI-IE OWNER OF RCCORD Or TFIF nRC/1 PROPOSED f'OR TI-IE PRCVIOUSLY 1nCN"f IFICD LAND USf: nC1'ION, OR, II" NOT 1-11C OWNER, Al'TAC1-(C-1) F1ER[sWITFI IS WRITTEN PCRMISSION T'ROM TI-IE OWNEIt nU'('1(ORIZING MY nCTIONS ON HiS/I•Ii:R T3EI-IAI.f. S1GNED: ~ - ~ DnTE-: nDDRESS: PFIONE: p)~ zrP. . '0~7 %1p ; - a~ ,r~ S1GN11TURC Of nPl'L(CA1<1"1' Olt Rf PRESENTnT(VE nAI'E STnTF OF WASi-11NGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SfGNED AND SWORN OR ArfIRMCD DGrORrL MC ON T(-IIS ~ DAY Or- - l - r 1997, i3Y /'r ► l~/~~~ . O~(P ~I r 4TA 01 ~ ; c~~•` s ~ Notary f'ublic in and for tlic State of Washington i~ ! Res i d i n s n t: a-olk,..- aQ~~~••••~Ap'~►`_ Myziproiiitmcnt expires ASH140 W ~ . . - - ' PART V (TO I3f COMI'[.GTED (3Y TI-IE D(VIS10N OT' (3U1LD1NG /1ND PI.,ANNING) DATrL SU[3M1TTf-_n: r- iLE 1!: 7~~~~0 Dn"T'E ACCrLT'TCD: -*I813 7 (3Y: 1 TOTAI_ f EES: 4?,fOb_ r50 RCCE1f''f Il: ~ ~ `FFl= s . . . • . a 4•_~ ~ ,t u S P O K A N ~ r, ,,r ~ T• C O L7 N T Y BUILDING AND PLANNWC • A DMSION OF TWE PUBLIC WORIS DEPA12TMrNT jAMrs L. MAN50N, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DCNNIS M. SCOTT, P.F., DIRECT'Olt MEMORANDUM RECE VED TO. . SEP 16 1991 Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red SppK4NE~UNTY FENQINEFER Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Steve Horobiowski Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings Department of Transportation; Mark Rohrer Spokane Regional Transportation Council; Glen Miles Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer West Valley School District No. 363 Fire District No. 1 Spokane County Water District #3 ~ , FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planne DATE: September 16, 1997 RE: Preliminary Plat, PE-1848-97, of Bradley Heights and Zone Reclassification,ZE-54-97, from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING SEPTEMBER 25, 1997 AT 1:15 DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1St FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM, Please review the above application and use the attached TECHtvICAL REVIEw MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend the meeting, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to me prior to the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS wil) be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning file for this proposal. Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 456-3675. NOTE: The Division of Building & Planning will now be circulating comments for SEPA Checklist at the time of technical review. This will be the only time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA Checklist for this project. c: Jim Mahar, P O Box 8512, Spokane, WA 99202 John Konen, West 110 Cataldo, Spokane, WA 99201 Attachments: Technical Review Form, Project Application, Site Plan, SEPA Checklist 1026 WGST BROADWAY AVLNUE • SI'OKANF, WASHINGTON 992E0 PMONC: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . . ~ Technical Review for September 25, 1997 at 1:15 p.m. Preliminary Plat of Bradley Heights with Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). Generally located north of and adjacent to Mission Avenue and between Center Road and Edgerton Court in Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Preliminary Plat to divide approximately 3.7 acres into17 lots for single family residences with Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). PARCEL NUMBERS: 45073.0505 SITE SIZE: Approximately 3.7 acres APPLICANT: Jim Mahar P O Box 8512 Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 891-8837 AGENT: John Konen David Evans and Associates West 110 Cataldo Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 327-8697 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Tammy Jones ~ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: File No. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Chapter 43.21 C RCW, requfres all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant , requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases , you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questlons apply to all parts of your proposal, even If you plan to do them over e period of tlme or on dffference parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental efiects. The agency to whlch you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for non-project proposals: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answerad "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). ' For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if appllCBble: Bradley Heights, a revised preliminary plat of 17 single family lots. 2. Name of AppliCBnt: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: 8121 E. Maringo, Spokane, taA 99212, (509) 891-8837, cell 879-3495 4. Date Checklist Prepared: May 30, 1997 5. Agency requesting CheCkl'tst: Spokane County, Division of Building and Planning 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): spring, 1998 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additfons, expansfon, or further activity related to or connected to this proposal? If yes, explain. No. The 3.7 acre site is the only property owned by the applicant in this area. b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain: No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal: Test holes were dug to determine the feasibility of on-site sewage disposal systems. The project will be served by a public sewer system extended to the site by Spokane County Utilities. Traffic counts and level of service calculations were completed at Park Road and Mission Avenue by David Evans and Associates, Inc. Rev. 2/1/88 1 A. BACKGROUND (continued) ' 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for gavernmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal Ifyes,explaln. Public sewer systems are currently being extended to serve the neighborhood including the preliminary plat area. Water systems are being upgraded in conjunction with sewer extensions. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known: Preliminary plat revision and zone change to UR-7, County Hearing Examiner; roadway and drainage plans, Spokane County Engineer's Department; final plat, Spokane County. All lots fronting on Mission Avenue and Center Road have been stubbed for sewer and water. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. (There are several questions later in this checkiist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.) The applicant proposes to subdivide a 3.7 acre parcel on the floor of the Spokane Valley into 17 single family lots having a minimum of 65 feet of frontage and an area of 6,600 sq. feet. Eleven oE the lots will front on existing street systems (Mission Avenue and Center Road) while 6 loEs will be served by extending Edgerton Court south. The applicant is requesting UR-7 zoning and on amendmenta to the approved preliminary plat of Bradley Heights to accomplish the subdivision. 12. Location of the proposal. Give significant information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provid a tegal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. The site Is located at the northwest corner of Mission Avenue and Center Road approximately one block east of Park Road and 3 blocks north of Interstate 90 in the six of Section 7, TWP 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. A complete legal description accompanies the application. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? 7he General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area (ASA)? The City of Spokane? (see: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries): The site is within the ASA, the GSSA, and the PSSA, but outslde the City limita of Spokane. Spokane County Utilities is currently extending sewer to the neighborhood. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for Agency Use Only 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circie one): flat, ro!ling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other. Flat ' b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Less than 2% c. What general types of soils are found on the site (i.e., clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricuitural soils, specify and note any prime farmland: Garrison gravelly loam, GgA, a glacial outwash soil typa.cal of Spokane Valley floor. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe: No. The sfte is on the floor of the Spokane Valley. Rev. 2/1l88 2 . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for Agency Use Only e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. IndlCate sOUrCe of flll. Very little fill marerial will be required because most of the lots front on established residential streets. f. Couid erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe: No. Construction activities for the plat will be limited to improvements to exiating street (Mission Avenue) and [he extension of Edgerton Court approximately 150 feet south of the existing terminus. ► g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings): Approximately 25% of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after eonstruction of residences, garages and driveways. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the eaRh, if any: Construction activities will conform to Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority requirements. 2. AIR , a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (such as dust, automobile, . odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known: During construction some dust will be produced from excavation activities. The completed project will feature paved streets, improved driveways and lawn areas. b. Are there any offsite sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, If s0, generally describe: The site is three blocks north of I-90 and five blocks south of Trent Avenue and the Burlington Northern Railroad. Surrounding uses are residential. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the air, if any: " Conformance to S.C.A.P.C.A. requirements during construction. Any wood stoves will comply with State emission standards. 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vlcinity of the site including year round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into: No. The site is 1-1/2 miles south of the Spokane River. A gravel pit extends into the Spokane Aquifer approximately 1/2-mile souChwest of the site. (2) WII the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, describe and attach available plans: No. • Rev. 2/1/88 3. . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation for Agency Use Only (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material: None. (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general description, purpose, and approximate quantiHes, if known: No. All drainage will be confined to the adjoining street system and to the culdesac extension as part of required road improvements. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain? If so, note locatfon on Ihe site plan. No. (6) Does ihe proposal involve an discharge of waste materiais to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No. The site is well removed from surface water bodies. 8. Ground: (1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities, if known. No. The site will be served by the public water system currently serving the adjoining residential neighborhood. Storniwater facilities will comply with "208" design standards. Spokane County is currently extending a public sewer system to serve the neighborhood which will include the infill plat proposed. (2) Describe waste material ihat will be discharged into the ground from septic ianks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. Each of the 17 lots will utilize the public sewer system being extended to the area. • (3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system, and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). StoYmwater facilities will be designed and installed in accordance with "2081' requirements. Sewer linea are being extended by Spakane County to serve the area. (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? No. This is a single family residential proposal. Rev. 2/1 /88 4 . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only (5) What protective measures wili be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3))? None. This is a single family residential proposal. c. Water Runoff (including stormwater): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. The site is relatively flat with esCablished streets on two sides. improvements to existing streets will require installation of storm- water systems complying with "208" atandards. The extension of Edgerton Court will also require "208" stormwater design and installations. (2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled, or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? No. Thfs is a single family residential project. (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. This is a single family residential project with very limited potentials for waste materials to enter ground or surface waters. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist): The site will be served by public water and public sewer systems. Storm water drainage will conform to "208" requirements. 4. PLANTS a. Circle type of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. shrubs. x grass. pasture. crop or grain. wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skink cabbage, other. water plants: water lilty, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered: Vegetation adjoining establiahed public streets will be removed to accommodate required street improvements. As each lot is converted to a housing site, the vegetation will be removed. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site: A1one are known. The site is within an urbanized area. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: None is contemplated. Rev. 2/1/88 5 . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: Small mammals. mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shelifish, other: other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None are known. The project is within an established urban area. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain: No. The site is located on the developed floor of the Spokane Valley. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: None. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electrlc, natural gas, wood stove, soiar) will be used to meet the completed projecYs energy needs? Describe whether it wili be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity and natural gas will be used for lighting, mechanical operation, water heating and space heating. b. Would your project affect ihe potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: Fourteen of the proposed lots are well removed from established residences. Three of the lots would be located along the north edge of the site adjoining existing residencea. These three sites could have a higher roof elevation than existing residences to the north. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included In the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: The project will comply with applicable energy codes adopted by Spokane County. 7. ENVIRONMEN7AL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. Thia is a aingle family residential proposal. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. None are anticipated. Rev. 2/1 /88 6 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Oniy (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: None. The project will comply with applicable buildings, fire, safety and energy codes. b. Noise: (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example, traffic, equipment operation, other? This is a single family neighborhood located on the floor of the Spokane Valley with Interstate 90 located three blocks south and the Burlington Northern Railroad mainline five blocks north. (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with fhe proJect on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other). Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. During construction noise will be produced by equipment operation. These activities will be confined to daytime hours. The completed project will have noise levela comparable to the adjoining established residential neighborhood. , (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any. None. • 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent prope►ties? 'rhe site is vacanc. Adjoining uses are primarily single famfly residences with the exception of an apartment house to the southwest, duplexea to the southwest, and vacant properties and a school fronting on Park Road. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 'rhe surrounding area is urbanized with single famfly homes. Agricultural activities may have occurred before the 1950's. c. Describe any structures on the site. taone. d. wll any structures be demolished? If so, which? No. e. What are the current zoning classifications of the site: UR 3. 5, single family residential zone allowing single family homes on 10,000 sq. feet lots with 80 feet of frontage. The proposed zones, UR-7, will allow single family residences to be established on lots with 65 feet of frontage and less area for lots. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site: Urban. This project would allow infill of single family residences. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site: N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive: area? If so, specify: No. The project is within an urbanized area. 1. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approx. 40 to 45 people would live in the 17 completed home sites. Rev. 2/1/88 7 . • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only j. Approximately how many people would the complete project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: rrone 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and proJected land uses and plans, if any: rrew single family homes will be constructed at a quality level meeting and in most cases exceeding existing housing , in the vicinity. Nine of the lots will contain approxfmately 10,000 SF of area while the remaining eight lots fronting on Mission Avenue, a neighborhood arterial wfll contain approximately 6,600 SF of area. 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high-, middle-, or low-income housing. The project will expand the inventory of middle income housing common to the established neighborhood. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high-, middte- or low-income housing: None. , c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: None. The project will comply with applicable building code requirements. 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The zoning code provides for a maximum building height of 35 feet in the propoaed UR-7 zone. Residences to be conatructed on the site will be typically one- and two-stories in height. b. What vlews in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? None. The project is located within a built up single family residential area in the Spokane Valley. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: None. The project will comply with applicable building code requirements. Drainage swale areas will be maintained in grass cover , 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will ►he proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Light will be confined to entries and patio areas of single family homes. b. Could light or glare from the finished product be a safety hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing offsite sources of light or glare may affect your propasal? None. d. Proposal measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: None. The residences will use residential lighting fixtures. Rev. 2/1/88 8 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) • Evaluation for Agency Use Only 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? The site is located 1/4-mile north of Spokane County Park and pool facilities at Park Road south of Interstate 90. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No. The site is an undeveloped parcel. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreational opportunities to be prov)ded by the project or applicant, if any: None. 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objecis listed on or proposed for national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally descdbe. No. b. Generally desceibe any landmartcs or evidence of historic archaeological, scientifc, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None are known. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: If artifacts are discovered during construction, the Spokane County Historic Preservation Office will be notified per County Code. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Shoev onsite plans, if any. The site fronts on Mission Avenue, Center Road and Edgerton Road which are residentfal streets. The local street network is well established in the area. The siCe is one block east of Park Road, an arterial. Mission'is designaCed as a collector arterial. b. Is site currently senred by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Transit service is available at Broadway and Park and at Park and Trent which are about 1/2 mile from the site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Each residence would accommodate at least 2 automobile parking apaces in garage and driveway configurations. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streeis not incJuding driveways? lf so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The project will require widening at Mission Avenue adjoining the site and the extension of the Edgerton Court culdesac to the south. ' e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oo water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. The site is 1/4-mile souCh of the Burlington Northern Railroad mainline. Rev. 2/1188 9 ' . . B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation for Agency Use Only f. Haw many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, lndicate when peak would occur. The completed project will produce approxfmately 160 to 170 new vehicular trips per day on the local street system conforming ro normal peak hour characteristics. Approximately 60V of this new traffic will use Park Road for access to the arterial street system. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Adjoining streets will be widen to conform to Spokane County standards. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public service (for example: fire protectfon, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generaliy describe. The addition of 17 new residences to the neighborhood will place ineremental demands for established public services including fire protection, police proCection and schools. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: The infill development will allow more efficient utilization of existing services including increased tax revenues from sales and property taxes. The proposed density of 4.6 units per acre will improve the affordability of sewer systems being extended to the • serve the area. 16. UTILITIES • a. Circle utilities cunently availabie at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other: b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Water and Sewer-City of Spokane Electricity and Natural gas-WWP water-Spokane County EVater District No. 3 Telephone-U.S. West Refuse-valley Garbage Sewer-Spokane County C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there by any willful misrepresentation of willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance that it might issue in relianf on this checklist. Date: SePtember 3, 1997 ProPo e t Name 4Le-, ' n~ I Proponent Signature: ,~:1:/~ 1.~/ ' E'L2~~`~~ Address: ~~a I 0 City/State/Zip: .Q , G~! Phone: (509) 327-8697 ~ Person Completing For(n: John D. Konen.~David Evans and Associates_ Inc_ Date: September 3, 1997 FOR STAFF USF ONLY: Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Based on this staff review of the enviranmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. `Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that probable signiftcant environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions. C. _Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends determination of significance. Filing Fee $75.00 Rev. 2/1 /8 S 10 S?OKANE COUNTY P-.ANN--NG PRE:LIMINARY SUBDIVlSION AND ZONE IZECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PART 1: A. GENrRAL INFORMATION NAMF OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. ' MAILING nDDRESS: 8121 E. Maringo ' CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99212 P[-IONC: (509) 891-8837 (work) (509) 891-8837 (home) F-%/- ~~33 IF APl'LiCANT iS NOT THr 4WiVFR, INCLUnr WRITTTN OWNi:R AUTIIORT ZATION rOlt AI'I'LICANT TO Si:RVE AS REPIZESEN'TATIVI:. LEGAL OWNCR'S NAME: Jim Mahar Pi-IONL•': (509) 891-8837 MA(L[NG ADDRESS: 8121 E. Maringo, Spokane, washington 99212 1'ROJCCT/('ROPOSAL SITC nRE-A (acres or sq.R.): 3.7 acres ADJACCNT ARCA OWNCD OR CONTROLLCD (acres or sq. R.): None ASSESSOR PARCCL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL: 45073 . 0505 ASSESSOR P/1RCEL ifS OF ADJACrNT AREA OWNEn OR CONTROLLCD N/A STREET ADURCSS OF PROPOSAL N. W. corner, Mission Avenue and Center Road EXISTING ZONE CLASSIr(CnT10N(S) (D11TE EST/l[3LISU(ED) UR 3.5 (1991) . EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant PROPOSED ZONING UR-7 COMt'REHENSlVE PLAN CATCGORY Urban SCf•TOOL D1STRICT west Vall.ey School District #363 • r- IRC D1STRiCT Spokane Val].ey FD #1 WnTC1Z PURVFYOR SPK/Co. water Dist 3 ('ROC'OSCD USC OF AROPERTY: Single family dwellings (x) Duplexes Multi-family dwellings Mixed Use ' Mariuf,ictured homes ( ) I3usiness ( ) Indush-ial ( ) Otlier ( ) Describe: LIST 1'REVIOUS f'LANNING DCP/1RTMENT nCTIONS INVOGVING TI-IfS PROPERTY: PE-1780-95, . , ' a preliminary plat of 12 single family lots, November 16, 1995. 13. LrCAL/ZONr RECLASSIFICAIION INFORMATION: L4CnI'ION OF PROPOSAL: N. W. corner of Mission Avenue and Center Road. SECTION 7 TOWNSI-IIT' 25 N RANGF 44 E. w. M. NAME OF PUQ[.tC ROAD(S) PROVfDiNG ACCESS: Mission Avenue, Center Road, and - Edgerton Road. WIDT1-I OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON i'UBLIC ROnD: 896 ft. DQCS TFfE 1'ROPOSnL HAVC ACCCSS TO AN nRTER(nL OR PLANNCD ARTCRIAL (x) YES O NO NnME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Mission Avenue, a collector arterial. _ i . . SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFIC/1TION APPLICATION Page 2 af 4 LEGAL DESCRTPT(ON OF PROPERTY (/1ttach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCIaUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION rOR ENTlRE AREA 'f0 i3E SUBDfViQED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAI' AND REQUESTED ZONING FOR CACH LOT AND Bi.,OCK FOR MULTIPLE ZONC REQUESTS. See attached legal description. IF YOU DO NOT FIOLD TITLC TO Tf-iE PROPCRTY, WHnT IS YOUR (NTEREST 1N IT? App].icant holds title to property. WMAT ARE THE CUiANGED CONDITION S Or TWE AREA WI-IICH YOU rEEL MAKE TI-I1S PROPOSnL WARRANTED? Spokane County ia in the process o£ extending public sewer services to the area. The site is within the I.U.G.A. WHAT 1MPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASS(FiCATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? None. This is an infill plat of 17 single £amily lots. WI-IAT FACTORS SUPPORT T1IE ZONE RECI.ASSIFICATION? 1) Public Sewer System extensions 2) Located within I.U.G.A. 3) Fronts on collector arterial. W(-1AT MEASURES DO YOU 1'ROPOSC TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? None. The project is an infill residential subdivision. C. PRTLiMINARY StJBDIVISION CENERAL INI+ORMATION: NUMBER OF LOTS 17 GROSS /1REA 3.7 acres TYPICAL LOT SIZE; 6, 681sqft10, 232sqft PROPOSED NET DENSiTY* 4.86 lots/acre SMALLEST LOT SIZE 6,681 sq. ft M1NIMUM FRONTAGE: 65.5 ft PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: individual Welis O Public System (x) Private Community System O Otlier ( ) Describe: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL hublic Sewer (x) Comniunity System O Septic tank and drainfeld O Double Plumbing O Dry Sewer O Otfier O Describe: UTILTTY COMPANIES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL: Electricity: w• w. P. Sewer: Spokane County Gas: W• W• p. Water: SPO Water Dist #3 Plione: US West DO YOU, OR Tf-IE OWNCR IN `fFTF EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THiS PROPFRTY, IiAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXi'ANSIONS, OR FURTf 1CR ACTIVITY REI,ATCD TO Tlq1S PROPOSAL? YES NO (X) 1F YES, EXPLAIN: " D. 1'RELIMINARY SUBDIVISION IMI'ROVEMrN7' INFORMATION: LEVEL OF STREET 1MPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads ( ) Public roads ( x) Arterial roads O Tract X roads O DESCRI[3E ANY COM[31NATIUN OF ADOVC: N/A EST[MATED T(ME ('ERIOD FXPCCTED FOR COMPI,ETE- nEVELOPMCNT OF THE SUBD1VISiON: Fall 1998 1S PHASING OF TEIE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PRO('OSED? Yes No ( x) If YCS, SHOW PHASING ON TI-1E PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND rOR PU6i..IC UST: CONTEMP(,ATED (Parks, scliools, etc.) ? Yes ( ) No ( X) rr YES, DESCRIQE: *NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS 1'ER ACRE MINUS PRIVATF AND/OR PUI3LIC ROAD AREA. o - SUT3DIVISION AND ZON1=; RrCIASSI~ICA7'tON AI'1'L1CnTI0N Page 3 of 4 l'AIZT II TI IIS SFCTfON OF Tf 1E- nPl'LIC/1TION W1L1, I'ItOVIDG TI IEE DIVISION OF f3U1LDI14G AND t'LANNING STn1'f WI'fl-I WRIT'fCN VERIFICnTION 'I'I InT TI-m- ni'PLICANT FI/1S 1-InD PRELIMINARY CONSUI,TnTION WI"f'I-( TI-IC nGFLNCIES 1DCNTIFICD. RESULTS OF TI-1E PREL1MINnRY CONSULT1ITION SFInLL [3[: tNCORPORATED IN T(-IC T'ROf'OSAL I3EFORC rINAL SUf3Ml"fT/1L "('O Ti-1C nIV1S10N OF T3UILDING AND I'LnNNlNG. Y F ' clitE DISTRICT A. TWIS T'ROPOSAL 1S WITFfiN ('1RC PROTECTION n1STRICTNO. B. ADf-_QUATPL /1RR/1NGCMCNTS (I-IAVT;) ((IAVENOT) i3E(:N M/1DC TO MEFT OUR Nf EDS 1N 1'ROVIDING FOR AN nDEQUATC WATER SYSTCM /1ND 1'AC1L1I'lES T'OR ('IRC I'ROTCCTION 1'URPOSCS. 773 C. RCCOMMENDTD f IRf FLOW: ~ ; OR UNn131.C TO CAI.GUL/1T'C' NOW DECAUSE USf_? IS NOT DEFINI"T'IVf ; AND WILL [3r DCTERMINEU n'T' (3UILDING 1T RM(T nPPLICATION T(ME. J~ D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: ~~(J Sc FPDO r 17 /✓Ic«~~ ~ 7 f IRE DIST'1t1C'(' S1GNn1'URr/`1'I~n DnT(.: C A-a-~ 9~,~ WATER PURVEVOTt SIG, OIzI A. SATISi'/1CTORY ARRANGf-_ME.NTS FOR DOMi?ST[C WnTf:R AND f(RE FI.OW REQUIREMENTS (1Iphk'4i} (IfAVC N01') (;CE-N MADL'. 13. 1ZEQUIRCMrN7'S/COMNICNTS: A VVflTEA MR tN FATEN SiON WI U. BE P~q U~ R r--.b ; SP 0K0NF_ 03CaMr Y W A iF_K ~'ZA 9-7 n I S~ R ir.~ 3- V~~nTER DISTRIC"r IGNATURC/'TiTLE UnTC rl F n/ C~ U L.-z-l t1 Jt,t ln 6 0 E , S'_C A I'RrLIMINARY DISCUSSION FInS TnKEN T'LnCi; /1ND GCNERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS ANn DRnINAGC 1•IAVC I3E-EN DISCUSSGD W(TI-I TI-iC Af'['LICANT. A. COMMCNTS: ~ sicNnr iirrr rLr: ^ n~~ r2,e c1 . S(o 3 G a a 'S n i'Rf:I..IMINARY DISCUSSION 1-lAS T/1KCN PLACI-L AND GrLNCRAL REQUIREMENTS T'OR SU[3MITTnL OT"1'H1S f'ROf'OSAL (FIAVE) (I-IAVE NOT) [3EGN S/1TIST'iCD. 'ft-IC DCSIGNI\Trm WATER ('URVisYOR rOIZ TI•1lS S1TE IS !5C=ON ~ .3 A. COMMCNTS: COCYZbrZAT~, UJy OATErL Po-IZV'E4t797 fZ (e sicNn`i'URE /T1T[r 5;DATE E n f'REL1M1NnRY DISCUSSI LACf: AND Gf_:NrR/1L REQUIREMENTS FOR SUDM(TT/1L OI' 'fI11S I'RO!'OS/1L (thk'l~ (-IAVC ~Q' . LEN S11TISfIf:D. PA_ A. COMMENTS: a (A~ . 4 . S1GN/1TURC/"I~f LE DA - ~.t~►4- 1?.~. uS lP 3 U v Is. ; ~ A PItCL1MINARY DISCUSSION 1-IAS TAKEN Pi./1CE nND GCNf RnL REQUIREMENTS FOR Ti-{C 1'ROVISiON OP ('U[iLIC SLWER nRE UNDCRS'fOUD C THT: Al'C'LICANT. A. COMMrNTS: 0C,)0A)EC'_7_ TO ti-QP, uC..- ~ fEE WERS. , IGNA'fURLIl'I'fLl: n`I'E , 'SU13D1V1SION AND ZONL RCCLASSO-1CAT10N A13PLICnT10N 1'age 4 of 4 l'ART It( SURVCYOft VCRIFICnTION ' f, T(-II: UNDCRSIGNCD, /1 LICGNSCD LnND SURVEYOR, HAVf: COMPLETED THE 1NrORM/1TION RLQUES'1'CD nNU TI-IE ZONING MnP, LrG/1L DGSCRif'T[ON, nND PRCLIMINARY C'LAT HAVC (3CCN PRCPnRED 13Y MC OR UNDCR MY PGRVISION I1-~,,ACCORDANCC W(T(•( TI-IE R(:QUI(ZEMENTS Of 'fFIE SPOICANE COUNTY 70N1 UI3DiVi N R' UL , ONS nND TI-lr; LAWS Of TI-IF STnTri Or. W/1 S f-I f NGTON. SiGNED: DATE: /1 DD RCSS: (//ti: 110 Ci~- jAe-,bn f' H ON T:: 5,2 7-~~ ~7 zin: , PART IV ~ (SIGNATURE Or PROPCRTY OWNERS OR LT_'TTER OF /1UTi-TORI7AT(ON) , 1, T1-lE UNDERSTGNED, SWEAR OR 11FfIRM UNDCR PCNALTY 0F f'CRJURY, Th1AT Ti-1E AEiOVT: RESPONSES 11RE MADE TRU7'I-IfULLY AND 1'0 T11~ 13CST' Of MY fCNOW[_EUGC. I C'URTI•IER SWF_AR OR Ar-FIRM T(-1AT f AM TI-1C OWNER OF RECORD Ol' TF1F ARCA f'ROPOSGD 1'OR TI-IE PRCVIOUSLY (DCNTtf'ICD LAND USE nCl'ION, OR, (r NOT TI-IE OWNER, A77/\CI-iEt) HER[;WITI•( IS WRITTC'N PERMiSSiON FROM TI-lE OWN(:R nU"fIIORIZING MY /1CT10NS ON HIS/1-I1:11 f3C'F(nLf. sIcNr_D: ~ nnTr: ADDRCSS: t/ ~'Y~~l~v~'~ d PF10NE: 1'2 zIP: SIGNnTURE OF nPPLiCAN"1' Olt RCPRESCNTnTIVE + DATE I , STnTE OF WASFIINGTON ) ss: / COUNTY OF SP01<11NC ) SiGNED AND SWORN OR AFr(RMLD [3G1'ORE MC ON TI•lIS ~ DAY OF r , 1997, i3Y ~ r~STn g' o' f ; - - I = 7./ ' . ~ lB Notary f'ublic in and for Ilic Stnte of Wasl~ii~slon ,y.L~ R es i d i ng at: , 0 •,,a-o1 ap M p'~ = y a~~noir~ln~cnt ex~~ires: WASHSNO~ ~ . ~ • • ~PART V (TO i3E, COMI'LETEn f3Y TI-IE DiVISION OF 13U1LDING nND f'LANNiNG) DnT~ SU[3MITTED: f ILE 1!: `7 L~ 7 DA"fE /1CCEPTCD: [3Y: OW", TpTAI, rrEs: RCCEtf'T Il: • s • • . • _ . . ~ i . ti ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING. ` PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ~ APPLICATION . PART I A. 9ENER.A.L IIFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: 8121 E. Maringo . ' CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99212 PHONE: (509) 891-8837 (work) (509) 891-8837 (home) PE}~~ L&'0 ~l i / - 8'83 : IF APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORI ATION FOR ~ A.PPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Jim Mahar PHONE: (509) 891-8837 MA1LlNG ADDRESS: 8121 E. Maringo, Spokane, Washington 99212 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq.ft.): 3.7 acres ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.): None ASSESSOR PARCL•L #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL: 45073 . 0505 ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CON?ROLLED N/A STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL N. W.• corner,- Mission Avenue and Center Road EXISTTNG ZONE CLASSiFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3.5 (1991) EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Vacant PROPOSED ZONING UR- 7 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCHOOL DISTRICT west Valley School District #363 • F1RE DISTRICT . Spokane valley FD #1 WATER PURVEYOR SPK/Co. water Dist 3 PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings (x) Duplexes Multi-family dwellings Mixed Use Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) lndustrial ( ) Other ( ) Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: PE-17 8 0- 9 5, a preliminary plat of 12 single family lots, November 16, 1995. B. LEGA,L/ZONE RECLASSIFICAIIONJNFORMATION: LOCATTON OF PROPOSAL: N. W. corner of Mission AvenuA and Center Road. SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 25 N RANGE 44 E. w. M. NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Mission Avenue, Center Road, and Edgerton Road. WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 896 f t. DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERiAL (x) YES O NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Mission Avenue, a collector arterial. - 4-a • \ SPOKANE COUNTY D--VISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING . CHANGE C]F CONI]ITIONS FOR A P~~~OUSLY APPI~OVED ZONE CHANGE . Date: June 19r 1997 AppIication No. Narne of ApplicantlRepresentative. Jim Mahar HrmesfInc . Mailing Address: 8121 E.~, Marinqo City: Spokane ' State: WA Zip; 99212 PhvneP 509-891-8837 {work} 509-891-B837 (Iyotne) Existing Zvne Classifica#ion: UR 3.5 Date Existing Zone Classi#ica,tyan Es#ablished: 1991 Legat Description ofPrvperty: See attached leVal description. Sectivn 7 Township 25 N_ Praitge 44 E. w . M . Source of Legal Descrigtion, Title company records and deed to curre,nt vwner. Parce 1No.: 45073. 0 505 PROP[3SED CH►4.NGE OF CONDITIONS Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original apptroval, (Cite the applicabIe condition from the Findings and Order of the Heaz-ing ExamYner Camrnittee's-public hearing). S.C.D.B.P. #X. "The.propasal shall comply with the urban residential 3.5 (UFt3.5) zone(s) as amended." S.C.D.B.P. #2. "The firhal pla~ shall be designed substantially in confvrmance with the 'Preliminary plat of record. No increase of derasity vr number of lots shal1 occur withvut a change of conditivn appl ~,catiox~ suY~r~ittal and ap~roval . S. C.D. B. P. #6 IF "The preliminar y p].at is qiv~n cond~tianal approval for five (5) years, especially to December 2, 2000. Give detailed explanation of request for change in status of the propasat. Sewers are being exten.ded to serve the area and the plat has been redesivned to feature 17 sewered lcats rather than the 12 unsewered lots' previQUSly aRprvved in PE-178 D-95 . Nine of the lots remain in the iD, Ooo sq. ft. range for areas whi1e 8 lote exclusively frvnting on Missivn Ave. are in tkle 6,700 sq. ft. area range. The UR-7 aone is requested to accommvdate the smaller lots. An extension of time is also requested t❑ provi,de sufficient time to camplet# -6-he p1at. If development ofthe si#e will be changed substantially by this reques#, vr the property has boundarfes different than originally proposed, a revised developmerrt pran must be sub,mitted. auO ure of ApplicanL Address if different thaWApplicant KNAHA0000APP VZO ME.frm - , , • • . r _ , ' SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Gand Surveyor). TNCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIViS10N MAP AND REQUESTED ZONING FOR EACH LOT AND BLOCK FOR MULTIPLE ZONE REQUESTS. See attached legal description. IF YOU DO NOT HOI,D TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? Applicant holds title to property. WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITION S Oi' THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Spokane County is in the process of extending public sewer services to the area. The site is within the I.U.G.A. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? None. This is an infill plat of 17 single family lots. WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? 1) Public Sewer System extensions 2) Located within I.U.G.A. 3) Fronts on collector arterial. WHAT MEASURES DO YOU AROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? None. The project is an infill residential subdivision. C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION GENERAL INFORMATIQN: NUMBER OF LOTS 17 GROSS AREA 3.7 acres TYPICAL LOT SIZE; 6, 681sqft10, 232sqft PROPOSED NET DENSITY* 4.86 lots/acre SMALLEST LOT SIZE 6, 6 81 sq. f t MINIMUM FRONTAGE: 65.5 f t PROAOSED SOURCE OF WATER: ' Individual Wells Public System (x) Private Community System Other ( ) Describe: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL Public Sewer (x) Community System Septic tank and drainfield Double Plumbing Dry Sewer Other Describe: UTiLITY COMPANIES AND/OR DISTRIC?S TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO TH(S PROPbSAL: Electricity: W.W. P. Sewer: Spokane County Gas: W.W.P. Water: SPO Water Dist #3 Phone: US West DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY , PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS, OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL? YES NO (X) IF YES, EXPLAIN: " D. PRF,LIMINARY SUI3nIVTSInLY IMPROVEMENT INFORMA'I'ION: LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads Public roads ( x) Arterial roads Tract X roads DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE: N/A ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: Fall 1998 IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes No ( x) IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.) ? Yes No ( X) 1F YES, DESCRIBE: *NET DENSITY IS UN1TS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLiC ROAD AREA. • ' M~ . . • ~ SUBDIVISION AND ZONr RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II T(-I[S SECT(ON OF T14E AP('I.1CAT(ON WiLL PROViDC Tt-lE D1ViSiON Or [3U1LD1NG AND PLnNN1NG STAFF WiTH WRITTEN VER1T'ICAT(ON THAT THE APPLiCANT HAS i-lAD PRELIMINARY CONSUI,TATION W!TH THE AGEN~tES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION Sh111LL ~C INCORPORATED TN TME PROPOSAL BCFORE FINAL SUI3MiTTAL TO Ti-1C DiV1S10N Of' t3U1LD1 G AND PLANNING. ~ ~ l; MARSUIALL/le , A. THiS PROPOSA[. 1S W(THIN F(RE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~ B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (14AVC) (FiAVC NOT) I3EEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS iN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATC WATER SYSTEM AND FnCILITIES T'OR FIRC PROTECTfON PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED T'IRE FI.OW: ; OR UNA[31.E TO CA[.CULATE NOW BFCAUSE USE IS NOT DE1=1N1T1VF; AND W1LL DC DCTCRMINCU AT [3UILDING PERMIT APt'LICA►TION TiME. D. REQUIREMENTS tNCLUDE: FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATUREITI"('LE DnTC • Pkc4.d C AA..,A q WATE PURVEYOR S 3 G d I A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMCSTiC WATER AND Ff RE FL,OW . REQUIREMENTS (11~4416) (1-IAVC NO"1') E3C(:N MADE. , , D. REQUIREMENTS/COMMCNTS: A VV'ATF..A MFIIIV EXYEN S/ON WJa BE : ~ RT--q 0 1 R ED ; S P 0 Kp,N~ GOUMY W ATER ajs7R ~3 _ iogot-li MU °.,`7 WATER DiSTRICT rooSIGNATURE/TITLE DATE C?JUNTY Sccrl~~•~yCr 6.,.,~ ~S'L3/ DU : : . n PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLIICC AND GCNCRAL RCQUtRCMENTS FOR ROADS ANf7 DRAINAGC HAVE BCCN DISCUSSED WITFf TFIE APf'LICANT. A. COMME-NTS: ~ . 1 SIGNA RC/T F-LE nT ~ r.r:.. ~,e d• ~f S l0 3 G d a ~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION IdAS TAKEN PLACC AND GENERAL REQUIREMCNTS FOR SUf3MITTAL Of Tl-tIS PROPOSAL (1-1AVC) (i iAVC NOT) B EN SATISFiCD. TI-1E DCSIGNATED WATL•R PURVCYOR POR TH1S SITE IS SCA.,0 N * A. COMMENTS: ~000,tjj~AT5, U►DI jikT:EQ- 4l&R.VE;eCa • /1# ~ - ~ ~o `T " 1GNATURC/'TITLE ?1D AP T, A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSI LAC[: AND GCNFRAL REQUfREMENTS fOR SUF3MITTAL OF TI-1{S PROPOSAL 1iAVC ECN SATfSFIED. A. COMMENTS: ~ . IV . . SIGNATURUT~i 'LE DA ~t~.► 1~aal. ~s`G 3 v o 4 ~ , A PRELIMINARY DTSCUSS(ON HAS TAKEN PLACF 11ND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVfS10N OF PUBLIC SCWER ARE UNDERSTQOQ ZTUIE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: E~ju~- ~W:Ea. C7~ r-t~~ a o-, Ce 1jac f . (GNATURF.JTITLI: ATC , . . . . • . . . • SUBDIVISION f1ND ZONE RECLASSIF1CATfON APPLICAT10N Page 4 oF 4 ~ rnR•r irr , SURVEYOR VCRtFICATION THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, I-InVE COMPI.CTED TI-113 tNFORMAT(ON RCQUESTED AND TI-lE ZONING iv1AP, LEGAL DESCRIPT[ON, AND PRCLIMiNARY PLAT I-IAVE DCCN PRCI'ARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION 1N ACCORDANCE WITI-1 THE REQUIRCMENTS OF T1-iF SPOKANF COUNTY ZONING/SUt3DIViSION REGULATIONS AND TI-1C LAWS OF TFfE STATC OT' W A S fIiNGTON. SIGNED: D/1TE: ADDRESS: I'HONE: ZIP: PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNFRS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) T, THE UNDERSTGNED, SWEAR OR AFPIRM UNDER i'ENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUT{iFULLY AND TO THE I3EST OT' MY KNOWLCDGE. i FURTHER SWEAR OR ArFiRM THAT i AM THC OWNCR OF RECORD Of T(-IE AREA PROPOSED C'OR THE PREViOUSLY iDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, 1F NOT TI-IE OWNER, ATTACE-IED I-{ERCWITN iS WRITTEN PERMISSTON FROM THE OWNER AU"fHORiZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/I•IFR RE(-[AI,F. SIGNED: DATE: ADDRESS: PNONE: Z(P: SIGNATURE OF AAPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE . _ . _ - 1- STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFiRMED I3EFORE ME ON TI41S DAY OF , 1997, BY NOTARY SEAL Notary Public in and for the State of Wasliington Residing at: My appointment expires: PART V (TO BE COMf'LETCD i3Y TI-IE DiV(SiON 01' [3UI[.DlNG AND PLANNING) DATE SUBMITTED: PILE 0: DATE ACCEPTED: E3Y: TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT 5 - RECEIPT SUMMkRY TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9701392 DATE: 08/20/97 APPLICANT: JIM MAHAR PHONE= 509 891 8837 ADDRESS: 8121 E MARINGO SPOKANE WA 99212 CONTACT NAME: JIM MAHAR PHONE=,509 891 8837 TRANSACTION: PRELIMINARY LONG PLAT DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) COMMENTS: PARCEL N0.45073.0505 FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY . ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT PRELIMINARY PLATS - LONG 1 200.00 TOTAL DUE = 200.00 TOTAL PAID= 200.00 BALANCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 08/20/97 00007883 8024 200.00 PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA , PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA ********~******~********~****,r** THANK YOU ***~,t******************************* . , , . PERMIT CENTER EAST PASSPORT Datc: Number: / . ~ Name ~ Yhone ~ Address ~ Commcnts: CUSTOMER ROUTIlNG ' ' ~ ~ ~ . ~ . r . : . ' • • •'•i • 1 ~r{}~ i~ Y.i::i.~f•.i•: ~ ..5: . ~ •iiii::. . . . ~.ir~.~..:::: -.:::~~.~yl• •h`t. y~ / h..~ ~ . . : . . •{.ti f.. • ~ i:::::::::.1 . J• . . . . . ~y n . ~(~~n~ . . ...:.1~.~ .............:::i~~'~ti:':•:•.:::•ti'::.:.•.ti~. . . . • ~ . . . . : . . . l.1. X ~ _ _ ~ ~ ll.... ~ ~ = J. ~:.1.... 3!U . . it !1 t :•::x ~ :•::.':~x.: ~ w.:::r.~ .:.:..:...........r,.. ~.Y~~ Y~V~+F... .~~N..~w::::::: :~ti{v.•.~w..:....n... w.:: : v,~ ~.1.~}::::. .....:n~.w.~Y~~J~{!~I.'-~#.'f4!+r..~flF4.~,•~HF. { . ?ti..~'•~ Addressiwg h ~ Pcnnit Raview ApprQaa Pamit ~ 8uildiag Permit Shorelines Info. Flood Plain Petmit Code Infonnalion Short Plat lnfo. PubliclPrivate Raads Commercial Review ~ ~•Subdivisian lnfo. Res. Bldg Permit Rev. Confaence Tecnp. Use Pernut Site Ilninage Info. fiire Safety Review Variance Appl. Subdivision Review Manufactwed Homo Zone Check Utility Pumit Mechanical Permits Zone Info. Llt~Zaue Cbange Review Plumbing Permits Private Road Info. NOFEEREQUIRED , Time Out Residential Review ~ . . ' ti:;;:; ;::•:•:;_x; st~t::~: ~ ~ ~:::;z;s:~:: 5:: j.:l::~::. ~ :'v:: ~ ::•::;:5{.; . ~ Sewer Permats ~ :~:r•::•::>::...,~•.:~~;. -;::......~``~"`:::~:..::r:: Dn►.ys~~►a::qf:.:ta`ir~.~~;.:: ~ Inforniatioa Subdiviaian Review Admin. Exception UI,ID✓Sewrr Wo. Binding Site Plan Wo Zone Giange Review CM. Of Exemption Compreheruive Plan NOFEEREQUIRED Reviewer Time Qut - Cond Use Permit ~:i~::~::::::~::~:::.::~:~:.:;;; •:rf•:;;.;;::.: •-r~~~ 11 Critical Arcas lnto. Y ::~eatt~~:~~sf~ct:::;:i:::....~ ti1:•: J::: ~ i ' . :t1V: . . ~ Nonconforming Use NO FEE REQUIRED O FEE REQUIRED T Reviewer Time Out Re%7ewer Time Out Reviewer Time Out u ~ ♦ 37; ` *4A/ cAof' S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DIVISIOIV OF ENGINEERIIVG AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer ' September 15, 1999 ' Doug Busko, P.E. - David Evans & Associates . 110 W. Cataldo Spokane, WA 99201 Re: PE-1848 - Bradley Heights 2°d Submittal ' Dear poug, We have reviewed your submittal of September 13'h of the revised road/lot plans and drainage report. These items will be acceptable for construction upon making the ; necessary plan changes for the following: • Review the road plan and lot plans/sections, and make their right-of-way and border easement dimensions consistent between themselves and the intended final plat map for the Edgerton Court lots 1-3 and 15-17. The Development Services department will await submittal of the road mylars any necessary revisions and the revised lot plans for acceptance. I may be reached at 477- 3600 Ext. #257 or direct at 477-7257. Sincerely, Gary Nyberg, Plan Review Engineer gwn/g:/conunents:PE-1948bradleyheightsr2.doc - 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . , Pre-Design Meeting Notes Spokane County Engineers Office ` Project Name: (~)(2AD(orN1 ~61 6Project Number: Project Sponsor: __Tv4 MA A*9.. . Sponsor's Engineer: r Design -''Firm: "7'bArvi ~rV~g Engineer: -~~(~t.~t&l Meeting Date: Meeting Time: J County Sta.ffPresent at Meeting: Other Meeting Attendees: nainelrepresenting name/representing name/representing name/representing The Following Items need to be Discussed w/ the Design Engineer General Items 1 a. List certain special requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval, EIS, or IVIDNS. This is not an all-inclusive list. The Engineer and Sponsor is responsible for adhering to all Conditions and design criteria. description reference description reference description reference description reference lb. Does the Engineer have a copy of the Examiner's/Staff Conditions of Approval? 2. Include Standard Plan notes in the Road and Drainage Plans. V~s Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 2 Spokane County Public Works , Road Plans 1. Road Classifications and Design Criteria. #1 #2 #3 #4 . . . . . Street Name „ Classification . . . . , .-------.....................---....r Roadway Width, w 3~7 Yo . ..Q. Minimum right-of-way width 6Yc5;•I06 ~ /2 . . • . See note (1) Min. Horiz. Curve w/ super ~ j~ : ~ f~- • ~ Min. Horiz. Curve w/o super 1V/A 1`t I A : General Land Slope/Terrain . . , ............................................ti "........:.::::r......................'""' . : : Design Speed, mph . . .......................................----............................-----...:....T.....~G _ . . . Curb TYPe& Clear Zone . . : . . . , . . (see Sec. 3.15) &ck aF 6A,C8 : 2 i'F 0443 :i . ~ ...........................__...............r Sidewalk required? (yes/no) :r Note (1) Additional right-of-way may be given by the Sponsor. Discussion: 2. According to the Design Engineer, what is the maximum number of units which will h v access from a single roadway? . What is the max. allowed per Sec.1.03? ~i 3. Minimum intersection spacing is 300' for along a Principal or Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04), and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street. What spacing is provided for this project? ~ fA Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 3 Spokane County Public Works , 4. Are any off-site slope easements needed, or off-site right-of-way acquisitions needed? If so, describe. N 0 N ~ 5. What type of turn-arounds are needed? (i.e. cul-de-sac, hammerhead, etc.) Street Name Turn-around Type Location _ . I~ xt- L L ::::....::::..................................................-:-------.........s 6. Road Surfacing Requirements (Sec. 3.16) a) What method in determining road surfacing requirements does the Design Engineer propose to use (i.e. AASH.O Design 1V.Iethod, County thickness table, or other)? cv uo~-T,4 `TTfiuc~~.ss ~ b) Provide the Design Engr. a copy of the Soil Sample Procedures, Design Report Format & Alternate Pavement Design Table. 7. Does the Engineer plan on applying for any Design Deviations? If so, briefly describe below. Please note that approval of all Design .Deviation's must be obtained prior to construction plan submittal. '9~~ t~ S t fl~w-A~ti-- d~~i ~b ~~l' C3c~ -D£ S~ • Storm Drainage 1. B asin ]V.1ap a) Did the Design Engineer bring to the meeting a basin map? If so, does the basin map show topography and sufficient information to be useful? . b) Does the basin map depict any contributing off-site runoff flowing onto the property? Does it appear to be correct? . If not, explain. c) Is a site visit needed to verify the basin limits? Schedule for: . {Note: Concurrence With County Engineer's on basin limits is required prior to plan submitta.l. } 2. Is the site located within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? -,&5 . What type of water quality treatment is proposed by the Design Engineer? ~;58 ~W( Qat~Areo ♦ Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Pagc: 4 Spokane County Public Works , 3. What subsurface investigations, if any, are needed with this project to make sure the proposed disposal process will function as planned. ~ 0 p~Iv_- 4. Are there downstream conditions which will affect the design of drainage facilities. .lf so describe possible mitigative measures. 1`~ O 5. Ts maintenance access provided to each GPA swale or drainage pond? If there is something unusual, what requirements were given to the Design Engr.? 6. What does the Developer/Engr. propose for providing for perpetual maintenance of the drainage facilities? Please briefly describe proposed mechanism, and what is needed to accomplish this. ~ l u ~ ~ ~ ~eefi.e Ty 7a. What Design Storm(s) should be used in the course of analysis (i.e. 10-yr, 50-yr, etc.). 7b. Is a Detention or Retention system proposed? Please describe. 8. Are Erosion Control Measures required with this project? If so, briefly describe applicable requirements. . 9. Is a second Pre-Design Meeting needed? A.0 b 4 + y Prc-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 5 Spokane County Public Works . , List of Documents Provided to the Sponsor's Engineer: a) b) c) d) . e) Any easements needed outside of the plat boundary, for drainage or other, are ta be acquired prior to road and d.rainage plan .sicbmittal. The Sponsar or Sponsor's Engineer shall provide separately a legal description and Title Commitment (or• similar proof of ownership) of the affected paj•cel(s) for pr•oposed easements. 7'he Submittal Checklist, completed and signed by the Sporrsor's Engineer•, shall be provid.ed with each plan submittal. Note: Provide n copy of this completed tlocument to the Design Engineer cit the end of the pre- design meeting. f Ienaine:PreDesign meeting ~cn DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, T R A N S M I T T A L WPSt 110 CRtQddO ro: Ed Parry, P. E. spokme, Washengtrnl. ggaoi Spokane County Engineers RECEIVED TeL- 509327•8697 DATE: September 13, 1999 SEP 1 3 1999 Fax: 509•327•7345 FROM: Doug Busko, P.E. SPOKANE CoUNTY ErlGINEER PROJECT: Bradley Heights, P-1848 PROJ. MAHA0005 ITEM COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 1 9/2/99 Plan Set, Submittal 2 2 1 9/2/99 Revised Drainage Report 3 9/2/99 Lot Plans 4 1 8/9/99 Red-Lines from Submittal 1 ❑ AS YOU REQUESTED ~ FOR YOUR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN REQUESTED ❑ DOCUMENT CONTROL ❑ FOR YOUR INFORMATION ~ FOR YOUR REVIEW ❑ COMMENTS: Ed, Enclosed are the revised plans, drainage report, and lot plans for this project, which incorporate the comments from your first review. If all is OK, we will make Mylars and have the Owner sign each sheet on the signature blocks that have been provided. Thanks, Doug Busko, P.E. • . Pi-ofessioitals • • Qiiality s:lengr\maha00051transmittal to parry.doc , S Q'1'1' U pQ ne 49 alley 11707 E SPrague Ave Suite 106 ♦ SPokane ValleY WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallCspokanevalley.org June 13, 2006 Mr. Jim Mahar Homes Inc. 8121 E. Maringo Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Re: Bradley Heights (PE-1848) Release of Warranty Surety Dear Mr. Mahar, A field review of this project was conducted by my staff and they noted two areas of coilcern. The fixst i.nvolved the filter fabric stiil being in place an the drywells within the swales along Mission Avenue. This needs to be removed for the drywells to function properly. The second cancem was with the swale, located on the west side of Edgerton Court. At the time of the field review this swale had not been constructed and they «Tere in the process of building a house on the lot where tlie swale should have been. Once these two items have been corrected, we will consider closing out this proj ect and releasing your warranty bond. Please notify this office when you are ready for the final field review. If you have any questions, please contact me at 688-0185. Sincerely, z'0004 JoIZn HoLiman, P.E. Senior Engineer cc: u , ~aaoamt , _ Page 1 of 3 w Wayne McGavran From: John Hohman . Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 8:01 AM _ To: Wayne McGavran Cc: Alysa Wiyrick; Henry Allen Subject: RE: List of project needing response to recommendations Ok to all. Wayne please wdte the applicable letters to close out the projects or notify developers where necessary. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne McGavran Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 10:53 AM To: John Hohman Cc: Alysa Wiyrick; Henry Allen Subject: List of project needing response to recommendations John, : Shown in the table below are projects awaiting a response to our recommendations. Please see the e- mail pertaining to each project or ask us if you need more information. SHP O 1-04 Jochium Short Plat OK - warranty review due in 2007 BSP 00-48 Spokane Va11ey Ma11 Indiana It is likely the escrow account is no Avenue longer valid and a warranty bond was - never established. Therefore, we recommend this project be considered closed with no further action necessary. PE 1750 Shelley Lake PUD Lake and The cracked and settling sidewalk will Shelley Lake 1 st Addition require replacing in the near future. However, unless the missing bond holder mentioned above suddenly appears, there is no obvious option that would require the developer to make good on its repair. Our recommendation, unless there is another alternative that can be used to hold the developer accountable, is to consider this project closed without further action. PE 1885 Prairie Orchard Request the submittal of as-built Record Drawings bearing an Engineer's Stamp. Release the surety bond in full without requiring a warranty bond following receipt of the as-builts. We will write the letter explaining this to Landworks 6/13/2006 Page 2 of 3 Development if you agree with our recommendation. PE 1852 Strawther's Addition Do nothing further until future status of project determined. PE 1860 Keystone Meadows Send letter releasing warranty bond and close project. Send letter to Jim Mahar Homes, the developer, to remove fabric from 06 drywells along Mission Avenue with a reminder to complete swale construction before warranty bond can be released. SP 611-90 Single Residence Consider this project closed. SP 1251A UR 3.5 Single Res. Alteration Project complete except for remaining 208 swale. Release bond in full once sod is placed in swale. PE 1414B Riverwalk 3rd Addition Consider this project closed PE 1750D Shelley Lake 4th Addition The redesigned plan for Pond C should be submitted and punch list items corrected before reducing or releasing the surety bond. PE 1339 Alcott Grove Addition Consider this project closed. PE 981 Southern Mobile Home Park Consider this project closed. PE 1345 Kirken Guthrie/Carpenter Consider this project closed. PE 1649F Evergreen Pt. 6t' Addition Consider this project closed. PE 1414K Riverwalk Commercial Request `Record Drawings' and project Certification be submitted. Have developer remove fabric and replace frame and grate on drywell with one meeting County Standards. Upon completion of these items, release bond and close project with no further action needed. PE 1751B Midilome East 2nd Addition Consider this project closed. PE 1206E Summerfield East Sth Addition Have John or Alysa conduct a walkthrough with contractor to verify replacement of cracked sidewalk 6/13/2006 Page 3 of 3 4 ~ panels and determine necessary swale improvements. Have developer remove fabric from drywells and inlets. Once this bas been done and corrections made, release warranty bond and consider the project closed. Wayne 6/13/2006 Page 1 of 2 f , Wayne McGavran From: Wayne McGavran Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 9:23 AM . To: Alysa Wiyrick Cc: John Hohman; Henry Allen Subject: Recommendations for PE-1852, PE-1860 & PE-1848 Alysa, PE-1852 Strawther's Addition I visited the site on 3/16/06 and noted that no work has been done on this project to date. The file contains a letter from the City of Spokane Valley, dated 6/3/05, approving a request for an extension of time for Preliminary Plat Approval which was to expire at 5:00 p.m. December 31, 2005. Their reason for the request was they needed time to obtain a letter of credit. A Letter of Credit was in the files, dated 12/2/2004, with Spokane Teacher's Credit Union. Called STCU and talked to Ms. Vicki Steen who told me that the funds were still frozen for this LOC. Recommendation: Do nothing further until status of project determined. PE-1860 Keystone Meadows . I visited this site on 3/16/06 and noted the following items of concern: = 1. The longitudinal joint on 4th Avenue had not been sealed. 2. At the east corner of 4th and Morrow Lane the inlet was broken. 3. The first inlet east of Morrow Lane on 4th was broken. These two inlets had broken at the wings of the inlet and don't seem to be causing any problems with runoff to the swales. The bond for this project is for $77,600 and the bonding company is Indemnity Compa.ny of California. The bond was dated 10/03/00. The file contains "Record Drawings" and Certification Package. Ca11ed bonding company on 3/17/06 and bond is still active. Recommendation: Require pavement joints on 4th Avenue be sealed and once this is done send letter releasing bond and close project. I visited this site on 3/17/06 and noted the following items of concern: 3/22/2006 Page 2 of 2 i . : 1. The drywells located along Mission Avenue still have the filter fabric in place on the frame and grates. 2. The swale on the west side of Edgerton Court has not been constructed. The warranty bond for $2900.00, with Washington Trust Bank, is still in effect. The date this bond was taken out was 2/4/03. This project was constructed in 2002 and contains a note that 208 swales are to be sodded or seeded when adjacent lots are completed. They are - in the process of building houses on the west side of Edgerton Court, therefore swale on that side not done yet. I could not tell if drywell had been installed in this swale due to spoils pile in this area. Recommendation: Send letter to Jim Mahar Homes, the developer, to remove fabric from drywells along Mission Ave. with a reminder to complete swale construction before warranty bond can be released. Please let me know if you agree with these recommendations or if you have any questions. Wayne 3/22/2006 . ► , gpo ene Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Vattey WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org December 28, 2006 Kerri Schoolcraft Washington Trust Bank INW Builder Services - P.O. Box 2127 717 W. Sprague Ave. Spokane, WA 99210-2127 Re: Release of Special Account Assignment No. 2008374431 James F. Mahar Project: PE-1848---Bradley Heights Dear Ms. Schoolcraft, Construction of the public works portion on the above referenced project has been accepted by the City of Spokane Va11ey. Therefore you are authorized to release immediately, Special Account Assignment for Construction Performance Bond No. 2008374431, in the amount of $2,900.00 in full. If you have any questions, please contact me at 688-0185. Sincerely, 1 ~ ~ John V. Hohman, P.E. Senior Engineer . cc: Ji.m Mahar, Homes Inc., 8121 E. Marino, Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Department of Public Works-Development Project File Page 1 of 1 ► ~ f Wayne McGavran From: John Hohman Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 11:58 AM To: Wayne McGavran Cc: Henry Allen; Alysa Wiyrick Subject: RE: PE-1848--Bradley Heights Bond Release Recommendation Ok -----Original Message----- From: Wayne McGavran Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 11:56 AM To: John Hohman Cc: Henry Allen; Alysa Wiyrick Subject: PE-1848--Bradley Heights Bond Release Recommendafion John, Tim and I removed the fabric from the drywells on this project today. This takes care of the outstanding concerns with this site, therefore I would recommend closing this project out and sending a letter to WTB releasing Jim Mahar's bond for $2,900.00. If you agree, I will write the letter. Wayne _ 12/28/2006 ~ A (Bank Letterhead) SPECIAL ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PERFOP:MANCE BOND MAkje6j For security puYposes only, 4f/&- ,("DEVELOPER") has deposited funds in a special non-interest-beariniKaccount for the purpose of surety for the full and faithful performance by the DEvELOpEtt of the construction of certain roads, monuments and drainage facilities for (Countv Proiect Proiect Name) ("PROJECT") s ec~fied in the typical section and roadway improvement plans for said PROJEC1', accepted on the L~- day of~ , 2003 and on file in the Office of die Spokane County Engineer. 1&~ k4 d , /YYO ~ The DEvE[APER hereby designates SPOKANE COUNTY, a polirical subdivision of the State of Washington, as beneficiary of the following: Special Account Number 4 45 1 . 1 in the face amount of (SXXXXX -public .improvements) aClop, pa private inlprovemeucs) ($YY~YXY`C - "I'ot11) and held in and by 4v4s 1-1irvG 1o-n Bnnk Name v I Bank of S1t//1/ f D~ ~/Z&S7- /,~9'AV& ,oA/'~04L&,L - Branch (the "BANK") Funds deposited in this account may be released to the DEVEr..OpER or any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of the Spokane County Engineer. The widersigned DEVELOPER hereby authorizes the BANx to pay over to SPOKANE COUNTY all, or a sufficient portion of the monies on deposit in the special account referenced hereinabove, upon (1) written documentation being received from the Spokane County Engineer indicating that the purposes for Nvhich the special account was assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required; and (2) a statement from the County Engineer of that amount of money which the COUNTY deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, the DEVELOt'FR hereby authorizes the Bfw1c to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested, up to the maximum amount in the special account. In the event that completion of said road and drainage facilities are not completed within two (2) years of the date of plan accentance, all fiinds ir_ the 3ccour.t shall be forfei±ed ta SPCKnr:E r-ouxTY •apor. t,.itter. :eq::es► by 'Lhe Spokane County Engineer to the BAN1c. It is understood and agreed that in the event of any shortage of funds to complete said improvements, the CoUNTY may have recourse against the DEVELOPER. For public roads & drainage facilities Said SPECIAL ACCOUNI' ASSIGiNMENT FOR CONSTRUCTtON PFRFORMANCF BOND PURPOSES in the amount of 03066 ~d~or the public road and drainage improvements for this PROIECT shall remain in effect until such time as the construction of said improvements has been accepted by the County Engineer and said improvements have been established as public facilities by Resolution of the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners. Said SPEC1Af ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT fOR CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE BOND PURPOSES shall convert to a SPECIAL ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT FOR WARRANTY BOND AURPOSES, in such amount as required by the County Engineer, upon (1) the County Engineer's final acceptance of the public roads, monuments and drainage facilities for this project; and (2) establishment of saine as public facilities by Resolution of the Spokane County Board of County . ~ - , ~ , Com:nissioners; and O 3 u on the BANtc'S recei t of thG p P ' County Engineer's notarized statement of final acceptance ar,u establishment. ~ a Said SPECIAL ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT FOR WARRANTY 130 PuRPoSES is made as security for the full and faithful performance by the DEvELOt'Ex of a guarantee against all efects in worlananship and materials which may become apparent during a period of one (1) year after the COUNTY' establishment of the improvements as public facilities. ~ During the wananty period, the County Engineer may reqtiest payment from the BANK for the purposes of remedy of such defects in materials and worlananship become abparent, by providing documentation to the BANK. The Counry Engineer's documentation shall indicate that the wol-k done contains defects in materials or workmanship in the construction of the improvements for the PROJECT aild therefore the purposes of said SPECIAL ACCOUNT ASStGNNtENT have not been fully and faithfully performed as required. The County Engineer's documentation shall also include a statement of the amount of money that the 0 outvTV deems necessary to complete such obligation. ~ Upon the BAtvK'S receipt of such written documentation, ttie DEvL-'LOPER hereby authonzes the BANK to release to SpOtcANE CoUN'rv that amount of money"requesied, up to ihe maximum amount in the special account ~ . ~ For Yrivate Roads atncl'1\roa facilities Said SPECIAI~ ACCOU~TT'~" E~t'f FOR CCNSTRUCTION PERl~Oluv1ANCE BOND PURPOSES in the amount of `~XXXXXX for the privatnd 6rainagd imp rovements shall remain in effect unril such time as (1) the construction of the private road and ~ainage ir;lprovements for this project have been certified by the DEvE[ opER's f Construction Engineer, in, accordance wi-;~! Ae Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, and (2)'said certification has been acceptcd by the County Engineer; and (3) the BANK has received the County Engineer's notarized statement of final acceplance. _ A copy of all sueh documentation and correspondence with the BANK shall be provided by the County Engineer to . the DEVELOPER at the address noted below, • DATED this day of .LA' . BANK: ~ ~1~•~~ ► ~/Yl ~~,i~-d~ L ADDRESS: ~~,C~ ~ U ~^~-~.~SYI►2~ HiU yN cy , ~,1` % CITY, STATE, ZIP: ~SIOM E,~A•.~5~~.'. . . PHONE:C~J~~~ *Q?ARy~i~~'it ~ A : = PRESIDENT: I PUOL~ SECRETARY: ~C _ %C 4; r t p 'O~F OFWAS~~~.~` ~ State of Washington ) ~ - )ss , County of Spokane I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that (nanie of verson) is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrun:ent and acknowiedged it as the (tvpe of authoritv, e.a., officer, trustee, etc.) of (name of nartv on behalf of whom instrument was executed) to be the &ee and oiun ct of sucli party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ' Dated 03 ~ ~ic in a v Notary Pub I N . ' for the State of Washington. My Appointment Expires: CC2~ 4~ -;WO3 DATED this day of ~ ~ . ~ DEVELOPER ADDRESS: T CITY, STATE, ZIP: _ ?,t~ ~ tvvZ lo~l ~~~►~►~►~~~~iri~~ HU P x o~: s o ~ a 3 9~ o . ? i v° ~,p1AA~ i ~ State of Washington ; • _ )SS County of Spokane ) % ~ ~'~OS~ p'• ~ 23 jF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that (name of nersonl is the person who appeare said person acknowledged that (he/she) signed this instrument, on oath stated that (he/she) was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the (tvqe of authoritv, e.e., officer, trustee, etc.) of (name of nartv on behalf of whom instrument was executed) to be the free and volunt, ac f such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~ Dated `T' -f'CV . \ Notary Pub c in an for the Sta hington. My Appointment Expires: k0J4r,csrgn1consr 12199 , . , ' RECEIVEd ' t ' MAR 0 < 2003 ; . S P O K A N E C`a DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A~ I~- , November 18, 2002 Mr. Jun Mahar , Homes Inc. 8121 E. Maringo Spokane, WA 99212 (4,~ 6.& . Re: Warranty Surety - Bradley Heights (P 1848) Dear Mr. Mahar: ° Please be advised the improvements in the Bradley Heights Plat are now Substantially. Completed. A warranty surety in the amount of $2,900.00 will be required before the plat roads can be established. After the County Commissioners have established the roads the warranty bond will be held for a one-year period after the date of establishment _ unless a construction deficiency has occurred in which the Surety Company, Developer and his Engineer wi.ll be notified. ` If you have any questions, please call our office at (509) 477-3600. - Sincerely, V/ John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager Cc: David Evans and Associates Inc. ~ File . 71--a X ~ ~ C:eff a c (g ~ ~ - i 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 ~ • . ~ i i' S P O K A N E • C O U N T Y ~ la DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT November 18, 2002 Mr. Jim Mahar Homes Inc. . 8121 E. Mari.ngo Spokane, WA 99212 Re: VVarranty Surety - Bradley Heights (P 1848) Dear Mr. Mahar: Please be advised the improvements in the Bradley Heights Plat are now Substantially Completed. A warranty surety in the amount of $2,900.00 will be required before the plat roads can be established. After the County Commissioners have established the roads the warranty bond will be held for a one-year period after the date of establishment unless a construction deficiency has occurred in which the Surety Company, Developer and his Engineer will be notif ed. If you have any questions, please call our office at (509) 477-3600. Sincerely, John V. Hohman, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager Cc: David Evans and Associates Inc. File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 , . ` ! P1848 - Bradley Heights Bond Summary Edgerton Court $28,200.00 Mission Avenue $36,000.00 . $64,200.00 Note inspection = $6,500.00 construction = $57,700.00 BOND ESTIMATE PROJECT P1848 Bmdley HaFghffi (MiSS10N AVE.) by Ed Parry, P.E. OATE 19-Oot-98 ORAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PR1CE COST 1) DryweN - Type A EA 1,00 1400.00 1400.00 2) DryrveU - Type B EA 2.00 1700.00 3400.00 3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 S) Grafe - Type 4 EA 3.00 300.00 900.00 6) Badc}IA For DW CY 110.00 17.25 1897.50 7) Drainage Strudunes, insta[Eed Pian calbut EA 1300.00 Pian callout EA 1600.00 Plan callout EA 1450.00 Plan Caiiout EA 1450.Ofl Plen cdlatt EA 1600.00 T) Cancrete Inld 8cX Type I ER 800.00 0.00 79) Sidew8lk Inlet, Type I EA 7.00 250.00 1750.00 7b) WSDOT inlet 8aoc & Grete EA 8) CPEP Pipe 1(Y" Dia. LF 0.00 9) ADS n-12 Pipe 12° Oia. LF 0.00 9a) PVC Pipe 12" Die. LF 10) CPEP Pipe 15" Oia. (AOS n-12) LF 22.50 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) PreCest Manho4e EA 0.00 13) Sdid tid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Excevet}on CY 70.52 12.00 846.18 15) Sod SF 644.00 0.70 446.00 16) Wpsp outfall pad LS 1540.00 4.00 NQN STANDARD ORAINAC3E ITEMS t) Wilbert Vau1t Curb Inlet EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 2) Erosian Protection lS 1.00 1000.00 1000.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 5) 0.00 6) 0,00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 11641.86 16) Monuments EA 2.00 185.00 370.00 17) Barticade LF 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 80.00 0.00 07HER SUBTOTAI 370.00 GRAOING, SURFACINC, CUR6, AND SlDEWALK 19) Rough Cr.lde CY 257.64 10.00 2576.39 20) Top Ccurse CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Coufse CY 73.61 16.60 1140.97 22) Aaphalt Conctete Tans 49.69 46.00 2288.63 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 561.50 8.50 4712.75 25) Curb Type R LF 8.50 0.00 28) Sidewalk SQ Yp 374.33 17.50 6550.83 NON-STANDARD ROAO tTEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADINO AND SURFACING 17326.57 $29.338.25 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, fNCLUDINQ MULTIPLtER OF 1.10 $32,272.08 Inspecdon $3,700.00 total $35,972.08 use =36,000.00 note: DEA total quote (inds utiliUes) =$660 for a11 Misston Avenue Quanttttes Grading top floor avg depth Volume Swale A 325.00 62.50 1.25 242.19 Swale B 357.75 114.00 1.25 294.84 Swale C 375.00 75.00 1.25 281.25 Swale D 317.25 96.00 1.25 258.28 Swale E 525.00 912.50 1.25 398.44 3wale F 506.25 180.00 1.25 428.91 1903.91 cubic ft 70.52 cubic yards sod 640.00 sf 71.11 sy stop start width Road 723.00 193.00 7.50 Mtssion Ave 530.00 3975.00 sf tangent ex 0.75 1.00 6956.25 cf 257.64 cy base 0.50 1987.50 cf 73.61 cy acp 0.25 993.75 cf 49.69 tons cul-de-sac radius area 0.00 0.00 sf ex 0.75 1.00 0.00 cf 0.00 cy base 0.50 0.00 cf 0.00 cy acp 0.25 0.00 cf 0.00 tons curb length type 6 # sides sum tangent 530.00 1.00 530.00 ex 257.64 returns 31.50 1.00 31.50 base 73.61 Cul-de-sac acp 49.69 total 561.50 sidewalk tangent 530.00 return 31.50 cul-de-sac 0.00 6.00 561.50 3369.00 sf 374.33 sy drywelis Type B 2.00 inspection 5.30 stations 500.00 per station 2650.00 " J • Bt,i.J ESTIMAT£ . PROJECT P1848 Bradley HeigAts (EDt3ERTON CO1JR1) by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 18-Oct-99 ORAlNWGE REMS UNtTS QUANTfTY PRICE COST 1) QrywBq - Type A EA 0.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 2.00 1700.00 3400.00 3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00 0.00 4) Grete Type 2 EA 343.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 2.00 300.00 600.00 6) BaCkfill For OW CY 80.00 17.25 1380.00 7) Dtainage SVuctures, installed Pian C811out EA Plan callout EA Pian callout EA Plan caliout EA Ptan Callout EA 7) ConCtete fnlet 6ox, Type I EA 800.00 0.00 7a) Sidawa{k tnfet, Type ( EA 7b) WSDOt tnlet Hox 8 Grate FA 8) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00 e) ADS n-12 Pipe 17' Dia LF 0.00 9a) PVC Pipe 12" Dia. LF 10) CPEP Pipe 15" Dia. (ADS n-12) LF 22.50 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) Rcecast Nlanhole EA 0.00 13) Solid lid fA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond EvuVation CY 47.06 12.00 584.58 1-5) Sod Sf 70.00 0.70 49.00 16) Ripap outfall ped LS 1500.00 0.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Wilbert Vault Curb inlet EA 2.00 250.00 500.40 2) Erosion Protectlon LS 1.00 1000.00 1000.00 3) 0.00 q) 0.00 s) 0.00 g) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7493.58 16) MonumeMs EA 2.00 185.00 370.00 17) Barricale LF 35.00 0.00 18} Street Signs EA 90.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 370.00 GRADlNC3, SURFACING, CURB, AND StDEWALK 19) Rough Grade . CY 451.55 10.00 4615.52 20) Top Course CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Course CY 135.47 15.50 2099J2 22) Asphait Concrete Tons 60.98 46.00 2804.14 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Cufb TypB 8 LF 318.00 8.60 2886.00 25) Curb Type R LF 8.50 0.00 28) Sidevwdik SQ YD 175.58 17.50 3072.22 NON-STANQARD ROAD (TEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 g) 0.00 q) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 15177.60 $23,041.18 COHi3TRUCTIDAI TOTAL, INCLUDiNG 6AULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $25,345.30 InV6ctlon $2,800.00 totel $28,145.30 Use $2$,200.00 note: DEA tatal quate (incls utilibes) _$8500 for all . ' . Edgerton Court Quantities Grading top floor avg depth Volume Swale G 741.25 315.00 1.25 635.16 Swale H 701.25 315.00 1.25 635.16 1270.31 Cubic ft 47.05 cubic yards sod 630.00 sf 70.00 sy stop start widfh Road 354.00 328.00 36.67 Edgerton Court 26.00 953.42 sf tangent ex 0.67 1.00 1589.03 cf 58.85 cy base 0.50 476.71 cf 17.66 cy acp 0.17 168.90 cf 7.95 tons cul-de-sac radius area 45.00 6361.73 sf ex 0.67 1.00 10602.88 cf 392.70 cy base 0.50 3180.86 cf 117.81 cy acp 0.17 1060.29 cf 53.01 tons curb length type B sum tangent 26.00 2.00 52.00 ex 451.55 returns 22.00 2.00 44.00 base 135.47 Cul-de-sac 220.00 acp 60.96 total 316.00 stdewalk tangent 52.00 retum 44.00 cut-de-sac 220.00 5.00 316.00 1580.00 sf 175.56 sy drywelis Type B 2.00 Inspection 2.40 stations 500.00 per station 1000.00 1 A , • _ 1 ~cn Special Inspection Agreement Prnject Name: Bradley Heights Subdivision Project Address: Mission and Center, Spokane Valley SEC 7 TVVP 25 RNG 44 Project Owner.• Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. Project Number. MAHA0005 David Evans and Associates, Inc. (DEA) will perform Construction Inspection as outlined below and charge for said services on the basis of the attached cost estimate: Part A. Road and Sewer Construction/lnspection of: l. Earthwork and subgrade preparation. RECEIVED 2. Placement of all base materiai and pavement. 3. Placement of sewer main ancl side services. AUG 1999 4. Placement of sewer backfill. SpQKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 5. Verification of side services and marker posts. 6. Curb and sidewalk instaUation. 7. Mandrel and air/liydrostatic testing. ' 8. Erosion control. 9. Coordination with Spokane County. 10. Preparation and submittal of street and drainage "Record Drawings", prepare and submit sewer "Record Drawings." Part B. Drainage Facilities - Inspection/Confirmation of: 1. Elevations of ponds, berms, conveyance ditches. 2. Side slopes: grade and embankment stability. 3. Dimensions of ponds, berms and ditches. 4. Horizontal locations of improvements. 5. Elevations and dimensions of drainage structures, including but not limited to: catcli basins, drywells, culverts, overflow structures, inlets, etc. 6. Notification of any significant clianges in soil or presence of groundwater. Part C. Description of Work . DEA personnel shall not relieve the contractor of his responsibility to construct the facilities covered by this agreement to the line and grade shown on the approved plans or as staked by the engineer. This contract agreement does not include construction management, scheduling activities, or preparation of irrigation "Record Drawings" as required by Spokane County for final acceptance of the street and drainage plans. 1. The scope of these construction engineering services includes: a) Periodic observation and reporting of specific construction activities on this project which include: sewer, subgrade, bases, pavement, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks, storm drainage and material testing; MAHA0005 Page 1 of 3 S/MAHA0005/SPECINSP.doc 3-Aug-99 . t _ J Special Inspection Agreement b) Maintenance of all construction records related to construction activities outlined in Part "A" above, which may include: daily inspection reports, manufacturers' certifications, material test reports and correspondence; c) Assurance that the construction of the road and sewer facilities are according to the approved plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDOT Construction Manual; d) Development of Post Construction Record Drawings for sewer, street and storm drainage facilities; it is understood that the facilities inspected by firms other than DEA be certified in a form acceptable to Spokane County; e) Coordination of the testing of construction materials for compliance to the plans accepted by the Spokane County Engineer, Spokane County General Provisions, the Standard Specifications, and applicable portions of the WSDQT Construction Manual. 2. Prior to acceptance of the roads and drainage facilities by Spokane County, the Engineer shall subm it all construction records and the Record Drawings to the Spokane County Engineer. 3. The effort to complete inspection and certifications in accordance with Spokane County requirements varies widely and is closely related to how well your contractor plans his activities; communicates with our inspection staff, and the quality of his work. To avoid scheduling coilflicts, the engineer and geotechnical testing firm must be notified at least 24 hours in advance of construction activities requiring inspection. Work requiring inspection that is performed without proper notification of the engineer or geotechnical testing firm will be subject to additional testing, or removal and replacement, at the contractor's expense. . Part D. Cost to Perform Inspection The cost to perform the inspection duties as outlined in Parts A, B and C above is estimated to be from $5,400.00 to $6,500.00. However, due to the inherent variability of construction projects, DEA will perform the preceding work on a time and materials basis. This arrangement has been agreed upon between DEA and Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. and was contractually entered into on August , 1999. Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. shall include provisions in its construction contracts to back cliarcre its contractor for the cost of DEA's services which may be required for re-inspection or re-testing of facilities which failed to meet the required standards. Billings for said re-inspectionswill be carefully identified on DEA's billing to Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. Jim Mahar Homes, Inc. will be responsible to back charge and collect fees from its contractor and/or subsequent sub-contractors. It is also understood that no work shall commence within any portion of the proposed Spokane County Rigltt of Way without first obtaining a written permit and approved plans from the County Engineer. It is also understood that any project facilities constructed without adequate inspection and documentation by DEA will be removed and reconstructed in accordance with approved project plans and Spokane County Specifications, or DEA will not be responsible for project certification or submission of record drawings to the County Engineer. MAHA0005 Page 2 of 3 S/MAHAOOOS/SPECINSP.doc 3-Aug-99 ~ . , - ~cn Special Inspection Agreement ACCEPTED FOR CLIENT: ACCEPTED FOR DEA: JIM MAHAR HOMES, INC. DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, BY ~ BY - TITLE TITLE ~~So e DATE DATE 1 t / 2-9 MAHA0005 Page 3 of 3 S/MAHA0005/SPECINSP.doc 3-AU~ 99 ~ , s-- h ~ . . r } I S P O K A N E J` . C O U N T Y A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTNIENT DIVISION OF PLANNIIVG MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Berto, L.S. FROM: James Richardson, Associate Planner ~ DATE: November 1, 2002 RE: Final Plat Mylars - Bradley Heights; PE-1848-97/ ZE-54-97 Please review the attached final plat mylars for Bradley Heights. If you have any questions you may contact me at ext. 7168, or stop by in person. Attachments: mylars , MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVEiVUE • SPOKANE, WASHIIVGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (549) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (549) 477-7133 , ~ 4' , OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: RICHARD E. WALTRIP FROM: DAVE BERTO DATE: March 3, 2000 SUBJECT: language for P1848 Bradley Heights The Border Easement as shown hereon are hereby granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents, and to the public for road purposes, including but not limited to curbs, sidewalks, drainage, signage, and other usage deemed necessary by the Spokane County Engineer for the safety and welfare of the Public. No fence or portion thereof will be constructed within said easement without permission of the Spokane County Engineer, nor will any objects be placed in said easement that would obstruct the sight distance necessary for safe and efficient vehicular movement. Any other easements granted or dedicated within this Border Easement area will be subordinate to the rights created by this easement and are subject to Spokane County Engineers permit process prior to usage. 46 f , Parry, Ed From. Parryr Ed Se.\t • •edneVLayp MarYh 22+ iVVli # V. T ! AM Toi CC: ~E~#[?, ❑~V ~ ~ Subject: f - - Bradl~ eighfs Drainage Language Daug: Per our conversation, I've taken the Drainage Govenant language and plugged it in to the P'lat Detlicatxan language, If this causes a problerrt with the Plat Document, pkease Pet me know and I'll generate a separate document for Jim Mahar to sign This is in Word 6.0/95 format Ed ~ ~icatia~ ~nguage ward695.dDc ~ Page 1 ! + / Offce of the County Engineer Spokane County, Washington 22 March 2000 To: David Evans & Assoc. Attn: Doug Busko, P.E. From: Development Engineering Services Ed Parry, P.E. RE: P1848 - Bradley Heights Plat Dedication Plat Dedication Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to Spokane County. Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right to ingress and egress to, over and from all public drainage easements and border easements for the purposes of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swa(es, ponds, ditches, culverts and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect or maintain drainage facilities located outside of public rights-of-way, except in cases where Spokane County specifically assumes that responsibility in writing. Neither does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the property owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. The property owners within this plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. If the property owners fail to maintain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or drainage facilities on private properties, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots or floodplain areas within private lots, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distanc,e of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in ~ • ~ ~ J- an approved drainage facility. All drainage facilities for this plat, including any `208' swales, shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Any proposed changes to the approved road and drainage plans must be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said changes. There may exist properties located uphill and adjacent to this subdivision which periodically discharge stormwater runoff onto individuai lots within this plat. Stormwater runoff from nearby uphill properties should be expected, and during snow melt periods or wet seasons the lots may be subjected to higher amounts of stormwater runoff that what is normally observed or anticipated. Because stormwater runoff from adjacent properties have discharged onto this plat prior to development, stormwater rimoffwill likely continue to do so after development. The property owners within this plat shall maintain all water quality swales ("208" swales), drainage ditches, drainage facilities and appurtenant structures situated on their respective properties, and any portion of a `208' swale situated in a public right-of-way adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified in the currently approved and accepted plans on file at Spokane County's Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not limited to, keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage facilities as needed, and maintaining live native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. . No structures, including fences, shall be constructed directly over or within a`208'swale without the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and/or maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the lot owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and/or maintain drainage facilities or appurtenant structures located outside the public right of way. I ~ SCHEDIlLE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM CDVERACE OF THIS GUARANTEE , 1 Except #o the extent that spec'rfic assurances are provided in Schetlule A af this Guarantee, the Company assumes no Iiab9lity for Inss vr darrrage by reason of the following: (a) Defects, liens, encurnbrances, adverse claims ar oiher matters against the tiUe, vahether or nat shawn hy the public records. (b) (1) 1'axes or assessments of any taxing au#hari#y that levies #axes or assessmerrts arr real propertyr; a€, (2) Proceedings by a puhiic agency which may resuit in taxes or assessmerts, or natices of such praceedings, whether or not the matters ex,cluded untler (1) ar (2) are showrn by the records af tte taxing authority or by #he public records. (c) (1) Unpatented mining ciaimS; (2) reserva#ionS Or exCeptions in paterrts or in Acts authorfzing the €ssuance thereaf; (3) water righis, claims or tiu8 #o water, whe#her or no# #he maners exeluded under (1), (2) or (3) are shown by the public recortl5. - 2. NDtwrthstarrdrrrg any spacffic assurances which are provided in Sahedule Aof this Guarantee, #he Company assumes no liabilily #or loss or damage by reasan of the fallawing. (a) Defects,liens, eacumbrances, adverse claims or nther matters affecting fhe title to any property beyond the lines of #he land expressly described irr #he Oescdp#ion se# fnrth in Schodule (A), (C) ar 4n Part 2 of this Guarantee, or title to streets, road$, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways to which such Eand abats,.ar the right to rnain- #ain th erein va ufts, tunnels,, ramps or any structufe or improvements; or any dgh#s or easements tho rein, unfe ss such prop erty, rights ot easemerrts are express ly and specifically set forth in said descripiion. (b} Defects, Iiens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other mat#ers, whether or not shown by the public records; (i) which are created, suffered, assumed or agreed to hy one or mare of #he Assureds; (2) which resuR irl n0 IoSS tp the AS5ured; or (3) which do not resuft in the invalidity or paterrtial invalidity of ary iudicial or non- judicial proceeding which is within the scope and purpose of the assurances provitled. (c) The identity of any party shawn ar referred to in Schedule A. (d) The validty, legal effect or pfiardy vf any matker shown or reterred to in this Guararrtee. GUARANTEE CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS 1. aefinEtifln nf Terms. 4. Company°s Op#ion to Defend or Ftasecute may be necessary or desirahte tD es#abGsh the title to The fallowing terms when used in #he Guarantee Actions; Duty of Assured Claimant to the estate nt irrteres# as staled herein, arto estaD lish the rnean: Cnaperate. fierr rights of the Assured. 0 the Company is prejudiced (a) the "Assured": the party or paNes named as Even though the Company has nn duiy #o tlefend by the failure of the Assured ta fumish the required the Assured in this Guarantee, or an a sijpplemerrtal or prosecute as set forth in Paragraph 3abave: cooperatian, the Company's ahligafiDns to the Assured under the Guaramee shall terrninate. wfitng executed by the Cornpany. (a) The Cornpany shall have the rigflt, at its sale (h) uland°; the land descnbed or referred #o in option and cast, to institute and prosecute any action or S. Proaf af Loss or Damage. Sch edule (A) (C) or in Part 2, an d imp€ovemerts affixed proceedin g, interpose a defense, as limited in (b), orto in additiGn #o and after the notceS required under ihereto which by Isw constitute real property. The term do any other ac# which in its opinion rnay be necessary Section 2 4f these Condi#ions and StpuJations have "land° does no# incGude any praperty aeynnd the lines of or desirable ta astablrsh the title to the estate nr interest heen provided to the Company, a proof pf Ioss or darn- #he area described or referred to in 5chedule (A){C) ar as stated herein, or #o estah[ish the lien rights of #he age signed and sworn to by the Assured shall be fur- in Part 2, nor any right, tiile, interest, estate or easemerrt Assured, Dr to prevent or reduce IosS Of darnage to the nished ta th e Company within ninety (90) days aftert€e in abutting streets, raads, awenues, alleys, lanes, ways Assured. The C o rnpany may take anY aPPropriate action Assured shail ascertain the facts giving dse to the loss or wa#erways. under the terrns of this GuaraTitee, inrhether or not it shall or damage. The proaf of tnss or damage shall deserihe (c) -rnortgage-: mortgage, deed af trus#, trust be iiabls hereunder, and shall not #hereby concetle lia- the matters cavered hy this Guarantee which constiM deed, or other secuft ~nstrjrnent. bility ar waive any pravision af this Guarantee. ff the #he basis of lnss or damage and shall state, tDthe exterrt (d) "public records": records established under Carnpany sh all exerotse ks 6ghts unda r th fs paragraph, it shal! da s~ tl~l~gerrtly. passible, ~e has[s of calcufating the amourrt of ~e loss s#ate stat~s at Date of Cuarantee for,the purpose o# or damage. U the Gnmpany is prejudiced by the failure imparting construcbwe natice of matters relating to real (b) If the Campany electsto exercise i#s optlans as of the Assured to prnvide the required proaf of loss nr pmpert}r #o purchasers far value and whout knowledge. sta#ed in Paragraph 4(a) Hhe Company shall have the darnage, the Company"s obligation to such Assured (e) "datep: the effective data. rig ht ta select cau nsel af its chaice (suhject ta th e Aght under #ha Guarafte shall #erminate. In addiUnn, the af such Assured to obxect for reasanahle cause) tio rep• Ass ured may reasonably be requ ired to sub mitto exam- 2. Notice of Claim to be Given 6y Assured resent the Assured and shal4 not be liabie for and will ncit inatian under oath by any authariied represertgve af Claimant pay the fees af any o#her counsel, nnr wili me Company the Company and shall produce for examinafinn, An Assure~ s~rall natlfy t#~e Compan~ pr~mptly in pay any fees, cas~ or exper~ses Incurred by ar~ +~ss ured inspection and copyir~g, at such reasor~able t{rrRes and in the de#ense af thnse causes of acfion which allege places as may 6e designated Gy any authorized repre- writing in case knawledge shall come to an Assured rnatters not covered by ihis Guarantee. sentatwe af the Cnmpany, all records, books, ledgers, herEurlder Of 2rly Ctaim Of 'Gtle of ifltefeSt Wh1Ch is (c) 4Vhenever #he Gompany shall have brought an checks, correspondence and memoranda, whe-ther adverse #a tha tftle to the estate or interest, as stated acton ar interposed a defense as permted hy the pro- bearing a date hefare ar attef oate of Guarartee, which herein, and which might cause lass or damage far visions of this Guarantee, the Corrtpany may pursue any reasonably pedain to the lass nr damage. Furkher, if which the Company may be fa[bfe hy virtue of #his llbigabon to final determinatinn by a court of ciorrlpetertit reqLested by any autharized represenhafive of #te Guarantee. If prampt notce shall not be given ta the jurisdiction and expressly reserves the right, in its sale Company, the Assured shall grant its permiSSiOn, In Company, then all liabifit}r of #he Company shall termi- discretian, to appeal from an adve rse ju dgment o r order. writirig, for any atathorized represeritatiwe af #he Com- nate wrth regard fo the matter pr rYaatters far which (d) In all cases where thls Guararrtee permits the pany to examine, inspect and copy aII records, bonks, pr•ompt notice-is required; provided, however, that failur$ Company tQ prosecute or ptovide far the defense of any ladgers, checks, correspondence and memoranda in to notify the Company shall in no case prejudice the adon or proceedlng, an Assured shall 5ecure to the the custody nrcantrol nf athird partY, which reasana6ly. rigMs of any Assured under this Guarantes Unless Oe ~~mp~ny ~hal~ ~e prejud~c~d by th~ failure ar~d ther~ Gompany the right ta so prosec~te or provida for ~e pertain to the lo5s or -damage. All informa6an de5ig. only to the exte~t af t~e ~rejudic~. defense ofi any actiarr or proceedir~g, and all appeals nated as corfidental by the Assured provided to the therein, and permk the Cvmpany ta use, at its option, Comparty pursuantto tfiis SecOon shall not he disclased 3. Ho auty ta Defend or Prasecuie. the nartte af such Assured far this purpose. Whenever to others unless, in the reasonahle judgmervt of the requested by the Gompany, an Assured, at the Company, it is necessary in the adminkstration oi the The Company shali have no duty to defend or prGsecute Company's expen5e, Shall gEVe the Company all reasan- claim. Failure of the Assured tD submft for examinafivn any actian or proceetling to wnich the Assured is a able aid in any acbon or procioeding, socurifig evidence, under oa#,h, prodtice ather reasonably requested Party, notw'ithstantling the nature of any aklegatinn in • btainir~g ~v~r~~sses, pr~secuting ar def~nding th~ °.~~rmatian ar grant pernjission to secure reasonably such action or pmceeding, ~~1ipn or Iawful act which in the opininn of the,C ompany 1~*:.essary. intormatfon frnm third parties as required - L (5 cantinued) the Aswred shall hot exceed the least of: If a paymeM on account of a claim does not fu11y in the above paragraph, unless prohibited by law or (a) the amount of Ifability stated in Schedule A or er the loss of the Assured the Company shall be govemmeMal regulation, shall terminate any liabiliry of in Part 2; bubrogated to all rights and remedies of the Assured the Company under this Guarantee to the Assured for (b) the amount of the unpaid principal indebted- after the Assured shali have recovered its principal, that claim. ness secured by the mortgage of an Assured mortgagee, interest, and costs of collection. , as limited or provided under Section 6 of these 12. Arbitration. 6. Options to Pay or Otherwise Settle Claims: Canditions and Stipulations or as reduced under Section Termination oi Liability. 9 of these Conditions and Stipulations, at the time the Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the In case of a claim under this Guarantee, the loss or damage assured against by this Guarantee Company or the Assured may demand arbitration pur- Company shall have the following addibonal options: occurs, tagether with interest theron; or suant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the (a), To Pay or Tender Payment of the Amount of (c) ihe difference between the value of the estate American Arbitration Association. ArbiVable matters Liability or to Purchase the Indebtedness. or interest covered hereby as stated herein and the value may include, but are not limited to, any controversy ar The Company shall have the option to pay or settle of the estate or interest subject to any defect, lien or claim between the Company and the Assured arising out encumbrance assured against by this Guarantee. of or relating to this Guaranrtee, any service of the or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any Company in connection with its issuance or the breach claim which could resuft in loss to the Assured within g. Limitalion of Liability. of a Guarantee provision or other obligation. All arbitra- tfie coverage of this Guarantee, or to pay the full amount ble matters when ~e Amour~ of Liability is $1,000,000 of this Guarantee or, if this GuaraMee is issued for the (a) If the Company establishes the title, or or less shall be arbiVated at the option of either the benefit of a holder of a mortgage or a lienholder, the removes the alleged defect, lien or encumbrance, or Company or the Assured. All arbitrable matters when Company shall have the option to purchase the indebt- cures any other matter assured against by this ~e amourrt of liability is in excess of $1,000,000 shall edness secured by said mortgage or said lien for the Guarantee in 'a reasonably diligent manner by any be arbitrated only when agreed to by both the Company amouM owing thereon, together with any costs, reason- method, including litigation and the completion of any and the Assured. The Rules in effect at Date of able attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the appeals therefrom, it shall have fully performed its Guarantee shall be binding upon the parties. The award Assured claimant which were authorized by the obligations with respect to that matter and shall not~ be may include attorneys' fees only if the laws of the state Company up to the time of purchase. liable for any loss or damage caused thereby. in which the land is located permits a court to award Such purchase, payment or tender of payment of (b) In the event of any litigation by the Company or attorneys' fees to a prevailing party. Judgment upon the the full amount of the Guarantee shall terminate all lia- with the Company's consent, the Company shall have award rendered by the Arbitrator(s) may be entered in bility of the Company hereunder. In the event after no liability for loss or damage until there has been a final any court having jurisdiction thereof. notice of claim has been given to the Company by the determination by a court of competent jurisdiction, and me law of the situs of the land shall apPry to an Assured the Company offers to purchase said indebted- disposition of all appeals therefrom, adverse to the title, arbiVation under the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules. ness, the owner of such indebtedness shall transfer and as stated herein. A copy of the Rules may be obtained from me assign said indebtedness, together with any collateral (c) The Company shall not be liable for loss or Company upon request. security, to the Company upon payment of the purchase damage to any Assured for liability voluntarily assumed price. by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without the 13, Liability Limited to This Guarantee; Upon the exercise by the Company of the option prior written consent of the Company. Guarantee Entire Contract. provided for in Paragraph (a)•the Company's obligation to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss 9• Reduction of Liability or Termination of (a) This Guarantee together with all endorsemeMs, or damage, other than to make the payment required in Liability. if any, attached hereto by. tfie Company is the entire Guarantee that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation All payments under this Guarantee, except pay- and contract between the Assured and the to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation ments made for costs, attorneys' fees and expenses Company. In interpreting any provision of this for which the Company has exercised its options under Guarantee, this Guarantee shatl be construed as a pursuant to Paragraph 4 shall reduce the amount of Whole. Paragraph 4, and the Guarantee shall be surrendered to liability pro tanto. the Company for cancellation. (b) Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not (b) To Pay or Otherwise Settle With Parties Other 10. Payment of Loss. based on negUgence, or any action asserting such Than the Assured or With the Assured Claimant. claim, shall be restricted to this Guarantee. (a) No payment shall be made without producing ~c) No amendment of or endorsement to t~is To pay or otherwise settle with other parties for or this Guarantee for endorsement of the payment unless Guarantee can be made except by a writing endorsed in the name of an Assured claimant any claim assured the Guarantee has been lost or destroyed, in which case hereon or attached hereto signed by eimer the against under this Guarantee, together with any costs, proof of loss or destruction shall be furnished to the president, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant attorneys' fees and expenses incurred by the Assured satisfaction of the Company. Secretary, or validating officer or authorized signatory of claimant which were authorized by the Company up to (b) When liability and the extent of loss or damage the time of payment and which the Com an is obli at- the Company. p y ~ has been definitely fixed in accordance witt~ these ed to pay. Conditions and Stipulations, the loss or damage shall be 14. Notices, Where Sent. Upon the exercise by the Company of the option payable within thirty (30) days thereafter. provided for in Paragraph (b) the Company's obligation All notices required to be given the Company and to the Assured under this Guarantee for the claimed loss 11. Subragation Upon Payment or Settlement. any statement in writing required to befumished the or damage, other than to make the payment required in Companyshall includethe numberofthis Guarantee that paragraph, shall terminate, including any obligation Whenever the Company shall have settled and andshall be addressed to the Company at 1 First to continue the defense or prosecution of any litigation Paid a claim under this Guarantee, all right of subroga- American Way, SantaAna, Califomia 92707. tion shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of for which tfie Company has exercised its options under the Assured claimant. Paragraph 4. The Company shall be subrogated to and be 7. Determination and Extent of Liability. entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against °any person or property in This Guarantee is a conVact of Indemnity against respect to the claim had this Guarantee not been issued. actual monetary loss or damage sustained or incurred if requested by the Company, the Assured shall Vansfer by the Assured claimarrt who has suffered loss or dam- to the Company all rights and remedies against any per- age by reason of reliance upon the assurances set forth son or property necessary in order to perfect this right in this Guarantee and only to the extent herein of subrogation. The Assured shall permit the Company described, and subject to the Exclusions From Coverage to sue, compromise or settle in the name of the Assured of This Guarantee. and to use the name of the Assured in any transaction The liability of the Company under this Guarantee or litigation involving these rights or remedies. y- F114'S7 AMERICAIV TIT_L-E 1NSURAIIlGE COMPAfVY EAST 40 TRENT AVENUE SPCIKANE, WASH1NGTON 99202 (509) 456=0550 nIRECT LxrrE FaR sHER:tY sToLz 838-7594 2ND AMENDED SUBDI,V{'SION GUAi',ANTEE . ORDER N4.: 142677-SS PROPOSED PLAT: NaT DISCLOSEp L-1fABl _L-ITY: $1,000.00 FiEE: $150.00 TAX: $12.15 ° FlAS_7'.l'►MERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, ACALIF'ORNIA C4RPORATION, HERE IN . CAL-LE[] THE COMPANY, SUBJECT T'4 THE LIA+BILITY EXCLUSIONS AND LIMITATIONS SET FORT!Hi BELOW AND IN SCHEbULE A. G UARANTE ES iDAVID EVAiNS & ASSOC. HE-RFEIN CALLED THE ASSURED, AGAINS T ACTUA'L LQSS N(JT EXCEEDI'NG THE LIABILITY AM4UNIT EM A'BOVE WIeIICH THE ASSURED SWALL SUS`fAiNl BY REASON GF ANY INC0RRECTNESS IN THE ASSURA'NCES SET FORTH IN. SCHEDULE A. . LIABILITY EXCLUSIUNS AND LIMITATIC?NS ' . 1: NO GU'ARANTEE IS GIVEN NOR LIABIL-ITY ASSUMED WI,TH RESPEGT TO THE VA+L-VDICTYa LtCAL ; EFFECT OR PRI'ORITY OF ANY MAT TER SHO1NN HEREIN. 2. THE COMPANY'S LIABILITY HEREUNDER SHALL BE IIMITEa T4 THE !aM(OUNT OF ACTyAL L-.OSS SUSTAINED 13Y THE ASSURED BECAUSE rJF RELIANCE UPON THE ASSURANCE HEiREIN SET BUT IN N0 EVENT SMALL THE C4MPANY'S LIABILITY EXCEED THE LI'ABILITY AMOUNT 'SET FORTH A'BOVE. 3: fiM'IS CUARANTEE IS RESTRICTED T4 THE, !USE OF THE ASSURED FC)R THE PURPUSE OF iRROV,IDI,NG TITLE EVIDENCE AS MAY BE REQUIRED 1N,HEN SUBDIVIDINIG LAND 1PURS_UA,NT T,O -'THE PR01/ISIONS OFCHAPTER 58~17zR,C.W, AN4D THE L.QCAL REGULATIQNS AND O'RpINANCES ADOPTEQ PIJRSUANT 7'O SAI'D STATUTiE. IT' I'S NQT TO BE US!EO AS A BAS!IS, F4R CLOSING AN1' TRANSACTIC)N AFFECTING TITLE TO SAID PROPERTX. ' , , Page 1 . _ - . , . _ . - , . • _ • ._..;.~...._-_3;- . . . i ~ ~ ' ~ " - . , , , ~ ' ' ~ ~ _ , , - , ~ . - ' ~ y:.. . _ . ~ ~ - - s- ~ ~ , . . , . ~ ~ . • ~ , ~ . 17 • - ~ _ ~ ' ~ , .,'i , SUBDIVJSION G'UAR'ANTEE " - ~ ~ 1 _ _ • `;:~y: ~4ri'~~ 1!+,t~JI 1 42 O'RD'ER NO.: 1 fi77-SS ~ SCWEDULE A , . ASS'UF~ANCES REFIERRED T4 (ON TME; FA,GE PAG-E ARE: A. TP7LLE, ~I$ V15STEQ INi: JIM MAHA'R 'H(OMES, INC..;, A, V11ASMINGTON GQRPORATIO'N _ ~ . , . • • ' B': 'THAT"ACCORDING To THE COMPANY'S TI~TLE PL~~NT RECORQS RE~LATIVE T4.TH'.F,~~'LL'1lIN;G. ~ . ~ . , • ~ . r,~~,yt~stl2.-~ : M.~~. ~ 1 ~ ~ OE'S,C~I~BE~D 'REAL PROPERTY ,(I~I~CLUDIN:G TH`4SE RECORD~S MAIN~TA~INED~-'AND=~~I~,NDi~~XED`•B~Y; ~ : • ~ TM'ERE•ARE N4~ rJT HER DOCU.MEN1iS,~FFECTINC TITLE TO' SAID'REAL~ P~ ° P~F~~~`~Yt~,O'R',~~ ANY::PORTI4N!'THEREOF,, OTMER,TM'A'N TH4SE SMIC►WN BE'L4W UNQ.ER R~~CORp;+„YN~A f~) 'fEF~S, . : . ~i.TH~E;.!FOLLCpUVING MAT1'ERS ARE EXCLUDED IFROMr.TlME~,~COVERAGE EJF THIS GV'ARANTem:~, ' r UIVPAT_~NT,ED 'MI'NING' CLAIMS, ~ RES~~RVAT`IC)`NS ~ C7R '5XCEPTIONS I N, PATEN~'S bR''IN AGTS ' AU~HOIRI~ING THE ISSUANCE l'~HEmEwOF., ~ 2- 'WAT,ER RCQWTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE T4 1111ATER. TAX DEEDS TO THE STATE {JF WASHINGTON-. ~ 4:; :,~DQCU'MENTS PERTAINING TO, M~fNERAL ESTATES, ~S'IP1IQ~I~: . ' - , - , . ' ~ , ~ . ~ ~~'te . - ~ ~ • ' - ' ' ~..TRACT 4, SANTA ROSA PARK, ACCORDING T0-' P LAT RECORpED IN VQLUME "B`-O~ - ~!PLATS, PAGE 78; {N SP(JKANE COUN TY, VVASHINGT(JN; LE XCEPT THE'1NEST 158 FEET THEREC~F; AND, EXGePT THAT PORT(14N -D:EDED Tta ~f'HE ~~'CfOUNTY- Q.F' SROKANE FOR GONTER ROAQ'P~R~ DEED~ RECORDEQ• JULY' 18`,~~ .-UN&M RECqRDING N0. 9517-26-B. , • . , , • . . , . - . . . , , ~ . , , r~~ tT • ' ' ' . , ' , . • , 'ii. ; , , ,f~ - . ~ - , •,y-r,I ,y,, , . ~ . • ~ _ ' - ,S~'*"' . . • , ; i..i • _ . ~ _ ""~r; . ~ . . , y ~ . , , . ~ . . • • , , . ,~'i ; . . ~ ~ . ~ ' . . . ~ ~ _ ' ' . ~ ~ ' , ~f'~ " ~S. ° -.Fs'.~~'~'. r-'?'r+'p - ; ' - ' i'y - i;"~i„•r: ir, t.;y ~4~y,'''.. ~J•r:~. . ~ - . ; `'~.:,.F~~ .~.~'~'.~~s,~..,~? /Rt'~rn~ .c,`?)ir'.?t ' 3~~~.~:`~:~tP~1.:''i.tC.•~Ly9;iw~-cYs:~~=~ ~ k~?r~~~_ . ~.~,`~Y~.,:r`~.i~.3.'~_.',.,~:~315,. :r;~'~'t.as=•a~:~~..:,~ ~ ss y.,~ ' i• .@;~ z ~eC*C~ ^ 'ti"`--'~w ;'_r.', ti~3lw;_t ~:~~'~~~k~ ~.1..4 ~ , - : . - , i~ ; , - . . ; " , ^ a' . b ~ . . , . ~ ~ S ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' • ~ . , ~ , ~ 1• ~ ~ . • . . „ ~ ~ 142677-SS , . G S I~RA~, `T.A.~~S. '~~T~ I~,~.;~' BE ~CQ~S, D~I:r~TQiJE~T'T AFTER AI'~~~!Y. ~3OrTzi: , SEC~JND H.A~.' ~3ECO~VIES UE~,II~Q~~T'r~ .A~"`TER OCTOBER 31ST, , • ~ Y AR: ~ - 20012, M ~9`U.~~~_ B~ILLED: $612.,0~ ~ ~ ~ . . r . ~ , T $306.,04 , ` - _ E C~NT D~: $306.~1~; ~'~:,~5~~~'~'~~~ST AND P'EN~.`x"~~ IF D'~~';~. ~ ~ N „'f . • • 1 ~ ' ' -6~`~~ .No.. ~so73I .osas . r-' , , ~ , • . _ ~ ; ~~~S-S.S~ED VA__LJE OF L,AIVD:' ~3 `6,500,00~ ASSRSSED VALU'.E 4F T1VDR.4VEMINT:$0.40 ~ . ,;3 : " SE,VvrER RATF, PREPAY'MENT AGREEMENT ANI7► THE, T'E~RMS AN.Q CUNt,)I- IONS ,T:~E:E~OF: . . , 'T~EN: SPQKANE CQ_IUNTY, "WASHINGTUN - ..,►;~I~: J'~'VI !4,N~S,. rNC. { t ' , , y_~ ~it c . . . , ~co,~~~N ~aEIc~m FA ~~,~i9~4~ . . _ . ~ .~<<. ~ . . . -k--CQ,kDJNG NO.. • 4171261 . - . . - ~ . , ~ . . , ~ ' . • , . , . , , ' • ~ , - ' ~ ' • - - ' ~ .:~~~~~ccx~~ n~~~: :~c~~ 24, 2002 AT s:ao A.M. . . ~ . , . . : ~ - , ~ ~ - ' ' ~ r ~ - ' •j : .-4, •-S . I ' ~ - 1 • ' 3 - , • ~ ~ . . i ~ - ,yl.`15~J►i~ . ' , , . ` ~ - . • ' • - - ~ 1 e~ • ~ First American Title Insurance Compat.rc:y, - ~ri , i: ~rlMi • '~i - a 3 ~ .~`r ,t ' . , ' , ' , ' ' ' ~r -f~` + ~ U yY 'xfl4 - I~ ~ BY~ _ _ - • POSIdENT ~'c~i . : ' ~ • ' BY . . rt o,~ , ~ A551STANT SECRETARY ~ . ~t' • r 1~~•',S•e,ll~'~~±F ' ~ ~ ~ ~ , • _ ~ ~ .1 ~ ~ ~ . 1 i i ' • ~ i t . ~k ' y 1 ~ ' • ~ , t~••, • • I t ` ~ ' ~ i . • _ . ] i ~ f; ~ ^ - , • ~ , , ~ i"~~ar.~' . • + • , l Pog!? 3 , _ . . ~ ' • ~ ' ~ • ' ' ' . µ,l~.~ " ~ x';: ..'ej. , , ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , • ~ ~ , ~ ~ ,,;'•:i• t~[ 1 ~ S+ 'itH: ~,.7rI' ,ti~~.s-~i' 'i^ t~5•~~i~~{+•~S~~Y; " ' . ' f«'~ r~„ y.' s•'.~.t, ',SF~ 1J"F'.i' - . • ~ '~,~~•~,V i'~ f t 'i~~.L~•~7 'e "~Y ,~t c' ~ tlt - ' " ~ . " " a . 1 ~"Sr: N°.r3. 'i.~, ;F'.~ 'r i.' ,.1.i ~ . ,~,'1''`t. •';k~',~..• . ' a 1'~ ' S.~~ ` 4x~~ 1~ i ~ a~~"'fv 5ja MY M ~ y ~ ~ • . S.~ A ME,1{~ ~ C First American Title C'ompany of Spokane ~ ~ Last 40 Tre»t Avenue # Spokane, WA, 99202 •(509) 456-0550 FAX (509) 747-2761 , . . ~ - ~ 1JOL-UME 8 PAGE f~ SECT10N TOWNSHIP' RANGE - - ~ - _ ~ ~ - _ I~~'/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~3r~',t..~i~11Y .r ' ~I',~ ~t ~ - , ~ ~ • + - • - = - - __~s ~ r ' }i , )N? ~ - ~ ~ - - _ I ~ _ - ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ . ~ . • ~ ~ . ~ , - ~ - - - - ~ _ _ ~ - - ~ ~ - . , •4~- ~ ~ , T - . • _ -4 4 -f 0 - ~ ~ - ~ 85-~!~` ,(~C AP1'r~ L~~ 0 1~ - - ~ ' ~ • ' ~ - - _ - ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ - • . ' -r , _ ~ . ti ~ _ - - - - - - - - _ - _ - i. - ' ~ ~ - - - - ~ - ~ - ~ . ' 4i1; - - - 1 - , ~ . • - -k f - - ~ . . _ ~ - _ - - 7-1 'A _ ~ - - - _ - _ - - - ~t'~ (C C?~t.. ORI ^0' , . . - - - . It ''d ~ - _ ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ' - ~ 4 ' = ~ - ti K~~i~ ~ - ~ _ _ . ~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ . • ~ - - ~ ~ , _ ' _ _ - ~ _ - _ , ~ ~ -~~►-~'ir'~'~ N , ';his sketch i~s, fur~ished as a courtesy anly by First Arnerican Titie {nsurance Company and Is NOT a, pa_rt of,,any► iitie commitment ~or polPcy of titie ~insu~ranCe. This s~cetch is furnished sofely for the purposel of ~ assfstf.,ng; in I'acating the prernises andl does not pur;port to show ail hlghways, roads or easements_,affecting . . -~t'~he property. No rellance shauld be ,placed upon this sketch ~for the location or dfinensions of the'property and no Ilability Is assumecJ for t~he correctness thereof. -i%n .l..l.l.E / 1 ' NUE ' ' . . `~~w, • n N\ / I ~ y 8 q~~~~ ti~~~,~~~~►5~~~,C~ - Piat Clicck I-ce Nuinbcr of Lo(s Jtn1c1 M ilcs (Ncw) '1'oca) 11rca. . . , . . . , , ~ ~ ~ n~,,,a► 1r'or(1i Arrow Scaic Lcgcncl ~ ' Ilroccclures Sc CcJui~~i»ctit UaSiS,Of UC~1fl1)gS . ~ C~~ l'hc Localion Dy •r;lie _ Olficill Signaturc Ulocks Survcyocs Ccrlificnlc . ~ CGeN~S~~ Itoacl N.►n„cS A rc , r itoacll`liclllis Acljacciit Arca I...ol Sc i31ock NuiiiUcrs I R/1Y Ucclication (icsignatccl 1 root scrips . ~ 3 ItPS on G 1_0 Coc>>ers Co 2 '1'rnct X N oc nrcas ~ l.. - Ucncli Mark • Closurc ~ u,ICA'1'ION Dcscril)Iiori (7'0 Map) ~ ~ r - , , . . . . ~ • ~ I Dcscriplion (To Ccrt) 0 wncrs A A'MA I -~s o w N - ccr(ircatc to Pi,7t rv&erz) Ne-%A) 1 Foot Strips ~ lt1D - C1'It S(alci»cnt '14/ ncccss I'roliibitccl It/NY Ucclication Urainngc Languabc, Uraiii.agc'Covcnmit ~ rlooJ lasur;►ncc 200 Uutuls -$l,U00.00 ca 208 PLnNS AI'1'1t0VCU l'civalc itoncl Doc. !I's 1'rivalc ltoad 1Varning , ~ Roncf PI;►ns a/ ltoncl Uoiicl lin>>rovcinciic f~~~ ltu:icl 13011c1 Ilulicclioii Signccl Uy Cnsinccr ' tt /g-7/nn, , 2P ~ A r'X2 _c- I tt i ~ ~ . / /os - A I\l1~►lallisl.ck97 IS . . _ . . f~ , r~~: . . ~ .1.~. . a _ar •a