The URL can be used to link to this page

28099 ENGINEERS REVIEW . Project Status A<<;ve Engineer's Review Sheet As Built Plans Received Plats File PE-1 773 -95 Road Plans Approved 7,E-QOQ7-9~ Companion Filcs: New Road Standards 5-15-95 Mylar Related Files: Iiearing: 11/04/1998 illiO t3uilding Dept: Technical Review: 02/01/1995 TR DRPC-089-95 Largc Lot J Bldg. Square Feet Preliminary Review: Type: No I_ots: 13 No. Acres; 15.7 Date Received. 01/19/1995 Range-Tuwnship-Section: 44 - 25 - 24 Project Name SHELLEY ACRES Site Address N. 12TH, F. Sl-[AMROCK, PARCEL(S): (tirst 18) Applicant Conditions Mailed: 45244.91 19 Mark &Bcn Simpson Mciiianus Flood "Lone Yes Vdater Source Public 921 S. Monroe Sewer Source Septic "Cank Spokane, WA 99204 School Dist 356 Phone Fire Dist (509) 455-5411 Phone Dist Survcyor Wtlliard D Boatwnght LAND MARD SURVEYORS 13528 E. Broadway Greenacres, VITA 99016 Phone (509) 924-3905 . ~ Building Ph: 456-3675/Ylanning Ph: 456-2205 Contact: KEN KUl-IN Date Submitted Description Initials Lng Need Drainage Plans Eng Need Elarvard Rd Nlitigation ' Eng Need Traffic Analysis Eng Necd Other J Eng Pay Fces R<n /(p /QTJ Lng Final Plat Fees Carnpleted Eng Priority Fees Received / Copy to Ac:,ounting Notice to Public / Notice to Nublic # 1 3 4 6 Complcted - or Needs to be signed i Design Ueviation Dates (Tn-Out) /24 /4l - 911--5'l9'y Bona quaniies ior drainage item calculated HcAring Date Dzcision Approved ^ App Den ~Cond Appld BCC Appealed to I3CC Decision App Den Connd Appld Court ~ Appealed to Caurt Decision App Den Cond Appld Stamped Mylars to Secretary (Sandy) Stamped 208 Lot Plans to Secrctary (Sandy) • Nt~ ~ ~ ~ . To ~ ~i~~~ _ ~ o!~ , _ _ ~~1 v~ 00 ~C-a~- - - - - _ ~ ~ ( $ •9 °t ~ ~ ~ u~6r~,~.~s~rc.-~'~ ~r~ - - - - - - C~~1-~ ~ ' `i. ct z5 4t Z rC5 czA Z Kov q,~ Ao" ~ ~►~fi ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ zt~,~~ ~611-4) vv~ /~'~i ~,~j j~,/~~-~,1~ ~G~ J~~t, T ~`'`T ~ n ~ QNrr ~ e~--s ~ , ~ ~ . ~ - . cv ~ , ~I~~ . ~ ~ . - ~ . ~ ,t . . . . _ . . , _ . } .r - y T_ . 5 ' AfT. , • , . , RY±,~ y • ♦i ~ . . t '~t~' - • t ~ • ~ ~ ~ tr ~ ` . . j'~ R~ r t . - - ~ p - ~ . RECEVED . DEC 07 1998 SPOKANE COUNTY H[EARING EXAlV1INER ~~~~UNTY ENGINEER RE: Time Extension Application for the ) FINUINGS OF FACT, Preliminary Plat of Shelley Acres; ) CONCLUSIONS, Appellant: Mark McManus ) AND DECISION Fi le No. PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 ) 1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL .4ND DECISION Proposal: Appeal of an administrative determination by the LoLirity Division of Building and Planning, finding that the preliminary plat of Shelley A.cres had expired and was not subject to a time extension request. Decision: Approval of the appeal, finding that the preliminary plat does not expire until March 23, 2000. II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONGI[.,USIONS The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the appeal and the eviderace of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact and conclusions: A. GENERA.L INFORMATION: Appellant/Applicant: Mark McManus, 14522 East Valleyway, Spokane, WA, 99216 Legal Otivner of Site: Mark McManus and Ben Simpson, 921 South Monroe, Spokane, WA 99204 . Address: None assigned. Location: Generally located east of the terminus of 12`h Avenue, approximately 350 feet east of the intersection of 12'h Avenue and Shamrock Street, in the SE '/4 of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Zoning: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Suburban-1 (SR-1). The site is located inside the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the Spokane County Zoning Code. Comprehensive Plan Category: The property is designated alrriost entirely within the Suburban Plus cateaory of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, with approximately 1.8 acres located within the Urban category. "The site is also within the Urban Impact Area, Priority Sewer Service Area and Aquifer Sensitive Area designated in the Plan. Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the originai preliminary plat by the Spokane County Planning Department on March 3, 1995. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Page 1 , Critical Areas: Spokane County Critical Areas maps do not show any geologically hazardous areas, priority wildlife habitats or wetlands on the site. Interim Urban Growth Area: The site is located inside the Interim Urban Growth Area boundaries designated by Spokane County pursuanx to the State Growth Management Act. Site Description: The site is approximately 15.7 acres in size, and is irregular in shape. The property is mostly flat to gently sloping to the west, with a very steep hillside along the east and southeast portions of the property. The sfieepest slope on the site is approximately 60 The applicant indicates that water mains, fire hydrants, gas lines and electrical power lines have been installed since the preliminary plat was approved in 1995. Surrounding Conditions: Shamrock Street and 12" Avenue in proximity to the site are designated as Local Access roads by the County Ai-terial Road Plan. The land southwest of the site has been developed for single-family homes, with lot sizes similar to or less than the proposed lots in the subject preliminary plat. The land lying west of the site has been given preliminary plat approval for a large residential subdivision (File No. PE-1750-94, preliminary plat of Shelley Lake), at a higher residential density than the cunent property. Central Valley High School is located about.3 miles northwest of the site. Shelley Lake, a private lake, is located a few hundred feet northwest of the subject property. The land lying north and west of the site is undeveloped land. Directly east and south of the site can be found a rock outcropping, steep and treed hillsides and basalt cliffs which adjoin the vacant land. The land lying south of the site is zoned for mining. Preliminary Plat History: On March 23, 1995, the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee entered Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order in File No. PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95, approving the preliminary plat of Shelley Acres, to subdivide approximately 15.7 acres into 13 lots for single-family residential lots, at a net density of approximately one (1) unit per acre. The decision also approved a rezone of a portion of 1.74 acres of the site from the SR-1 zone to the UR-3.5 zone. Spokane County Planning Department Condition #8 of such approval gave conditional approval of the preliminary plat for three years, until April 1, 1998, and advised the applicant that a request for extension of time could be requested by submitting a written request "approximately 45 days" prior to the April 1, 1998 expiration date. Pursuant to a letter dated May 4, 1998, the County Division of Building and Planning advised the applicant that the preliminary plat had expired on April l, 1998. On August 18, 1998, the applicant's legal counsel submitted a letter to the Division requesting that the Division reconsider its position and allow the applicant to request a time extension for the project. Pursuant to a letter dated September l, 1998, the Division responded that the request for extension of time was untimely, and that the Division's determination could be appealed to the Hearing Examiner pursuant to Section 12.100.126 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. On September 14, 1998, the applicant appealed the Division's determination to the Hearing Examiner. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Page 2 B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATI0N: Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapter 14.612 and 14.616. Hearing Date and Location: November 4, 1998, Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA. Notices: Mailed: October 19, 1998, by applicant. Posted: October 20, 19981 by applicant Published: October 16, 1998 The legal requirements for public hearing notice have been met. Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution No. 96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance) and Resolution No. 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure). Testimony: John Pederson John Bury Division of Building and Planning 631 Lincoln Building 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Russ Grant Mark McManus 6023 North Atlantic #1 14522 East Valleyway Spokane,'WA 99205 Spokane, WA 99216 Jim McConnachie Bill Main Jr. 14021 East Boone 12810 East Nora Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99216 Dick Wait Ron Hormarul 1418 South Shamrock 1319 South Shamrock Veradale, WA 99037 Veradaie, WA 99037 Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zoning Code, and Spokane County Code. County Resolution No. 97-0652 (amending Critical Areas Ordinance), 97-0321 (adopting interim development regulations regarding County ILJGAs), 97-0134 (establishing IUGA boundaries, including map of boundaries), 96-0302 (adopting Critical Areas Ordinance), and 96-1224 (adopting Subdivision Ordinance). Also Spokane County Critical Areas Maps. C. EYTENSION OF TIME ANALYSIS: 1. Pertinent reizulations When the preliminary plat of Shelley Acres was approved in March, 1995, former RCW 58.17.140 provided an initial three (3)-year period for finalizing a preliminary plat. Such statute also autliorized a one (1)-year extension of time beyond such three (3)-year period, if a written request for extension was made within 30 days of the expiration of the three (3)-year period and HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 PagP 3 upon a showing that the applicant had attempted in good faith to submit the final plat within the three (3)-year period. Additional extensions could be granted by counties under the statute, based on criteria adopted by the individual county. The th.ree (3)-year time period in former RCW 58.17.140 was based on amendments to such statute adopted by the State Legislature in 1986, which increased the initial time period for finalizing a preliminary plat from two (2) years to three (3) years. The 1986 amendments also provided for retroactive application of the initial three (3)-year time period to any preliminary plat pending before a...county as of July 24, 1993, where the authority to proceed with the filing of a final plat has not lapsed under an applicable county ordinance containing a shorter time period that was in effect when the preliminary plat was approved." See former RCW 58.17.140 (as amended by Chapter 233, Section 2, Laws of 1986 Regular Session). At the time the preliminary plat was approved by the County in March, 1995, former title 13 of the Spokane County Code (SCC) provided, in pertinent part: 13.12.120 Approval of ct preliminury subclivision shall airtomatieally expire three (3) years after preliminary anproval is granted unle.ss a time extension is applied for. In any case that the subdivision does not apply for a time extension when required under this title, the prelinzinary upprovul expires and the subdivision zs null and void. Upon application for time extension, the planning director or designee may administratively approve extetisions for up to three yeur periods provided at least one of the following circumstayices is found to apply... The fee for such application shall be set by resolLCtion of the board of coainty commissioners. Application forms ajicl sacpporting data requiremenls for tiine extensions are required aj2d will be provitled upon the szcbdivider's request, by the plarining director. See former SCC 13.12.120, and County Resolution No. 86-246. Former SCC 13.12.120 did not specify the time when a time extension request must be applied for, other than by implication that it must be submitted before the preliminary plat expired. Former Title 13 did indicate in places that subdivisions must comply with the state subdivision law (chapter 58.17 RCW) as last amended in 1974, and with applicable rules and regulations. See former SCC 13.04.020, 13.12.010 and 13.12.020. Former 13.12.010 provided as follows: All subdivisions shall conform to the Spokane Coicjity compreherisive platz, all zotiing regzclations, and all other applicable local and state reeulatioris in effect at the tirrie any preliminary subdivision is subrrcitted for approval or at the time an e,Ctension of time is granted. [Emphasis added, County Ordinance 80-424, #IV (B)(1)]. The application of the above-quoted provision must be tempered against the application of former SCC 13.12.040, which defines HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Page 4 . when a preliminary plat application is complete for the purposes of applying the vesting requirements of RCW 58.17.033. Under RCW 58.17.033, a preliminary subdivision application is to be considered under the laws in effect when a fully completed application for such preliminary subdivision was submitted. Effective July 23, 1995, RCW 58.17.140 was amended to increase the initial time period for finalizing a preliminary plat from thxee (3) years to five (5) years, subject to such extensions of time as counties might provide for by ordinance, which extensions "may or may not contain additional or altered conditions of approval." (See Chapter 68, Section 1, Laws of 1995 Regular Session). The amendments did not address any retroactive application of such five (5)-year period to preliminary plats. In 1995, former SCC 13.12.120 was amended to specify a five (5)-year initial time period for finalizing a preliminary plat, as provided in RCW 58.17.140, but its provisions regarding time extensions were not modified. Former SCC 13.12.120 otherwise remained unchanged between 1993 and 1996. See County Resolution Nos. 95-1105, Attachment A; County Resolution No. 86-246. RCW 58.17.140 currently authorizes counties to provide by ordinance for extensions of time for the final platting of a preliminary plat, beyond the initial five (5)-year time frame provided for final plat approval. Effective January 1, 1997, the County adopted a new subdivision ordinance, which repealed chapters 12 and 13 of the Spokane County Code. See County Resolution No. 96-1224. Such ordinance has not yet been codified into the County Code, which omission does not affect its enforceability. Former SCC 13.12.120, which addressed time extensions and preliminary plat expiration, was replaced with sections 12.100.116, 12.100.118, 12.100.126 and 12.400.120 of the new ordinance. Section 12.100.118 of the Subdivision Ordinance somewhat modified the criteria for granting time extensions, established a deadline for the submittal of time extension requests (i.e. 30 days before plat expiration) and revised the length of time for which time extensions could be granted. This included an initial five (5)-year time period for finalizing a preliminary plat, which could be extended for one three (3)-year time extension and successive one (l )-year extensions, based on the satisfaction of certain criteria, and compliance with new or altered conditions required by public agencies to protect the public health, safety and welfare. Sections 12.100.116 and 12.400.120 indicate that a preliminary plat will expire within five (S) years from its initial approval, and be null and void, unless a time extension request is granted under the provisions of chapter 12.100 of the ordinance. 2. Procedural status of anpeal In December, 1996, Spokane County adopted a hearing examiner system, which authorized the County Hearing Examiner to hear and decide appeals from administrative decisions rendered by the County Division of Building and Planning. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Attachment A, Section 7. Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0293 ambiguously provided for either a 10-day period or 14-day period for appealing County administrative decisions to the Hearing Examiner. See County Resolution No. 96-0293, Section .070, paragraph (A)(2) and Section .080 (B). However, effective July 23, 1995, state law required a 14-day appeal period for administrative land use appeals. RCW 36.70B.110 (9) HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Page 5 ~ Section 12.100.118 of the Subdivision Ordinance indicates that appeals of time extensions shall be filed consistent with the provisions of section 12.100.126 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Section 12.100.126 authorizes the appeal of administrative decisions or actions rendered by the County Division of Building and Planning to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, pursuant to the provisions of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance. SCC 12.100.126 provides a 14-day appeal period for appealing such determinations. The Staff Report takes the position that the expiration of the preliminary plat on April 1, 1998, under the Hearing Examiner Committee's 1995 decision, without timely application for an extension of time under section 12.100.116 of the Subdivision Ordinance, is not subject to appeal to the Hearing Examiner under section 12.100.126 of the Subdivision Ordinance. This partly reverses the position taken by the Division in its September 1, 1998 letter to the appellant's attorney, John Bury. In such letter, the Division advised that its position on expiration of the preliminary plat could be appealed to the Hearing Examiner, based on the Hearing Examiner's 1997 decision on the time extension application for the preliminary plat of Cambridge Knoll. See Hearing Examiner Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision dated 11-18-97 in File No. PN-1696-93 . The Examiner agrees that the current appeal does not involve an administrative decision either denying or approving a time extension application under Section 12.100.118 of the Subdivision Ordinance, since the appellant to this day has not filed a time extension application. However, the Division's May 4, 1998 and September 1, 1998 do represent an interpretation of the Subdivision Ordinance. RCW 36.70B.030 (3) and RCW 36.70B.110 (9) require local government to provide and adopt procedures for obtaining adlninistrative interpretations of its development regulations. Paragraphs .0 1 0.B.3 and .080 of Couniy Resolution No. 96-0293, which resolution is intended to implement chapter 36.70B RCW (ESHB 1724), specifically provide for appeal of administrative interpretations of County development regulations to the Hcaring Examiner. The Hearing Examiner Ordinance by its terms takes precedence over all conflicting County regulations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Attachment "A", Section 16. The above resolutions can be read together without conflict to indicate that administrative interpretations issued by the Division of Building, and Planning are administrative decisions subject to appeal to the Hearing Examiner, under the appeal provisions of the Hearing Examiner Ordinance. This should particularly be the case with regard to administrative interpretations that relate to the final disposal of a land use action, such as a determination that a preliminary plat has expired and cannot be extended by the filing of a time extension application. The Examiner could take the position that the appellant did not timely appeal the statement by the Division of Building and Planning in its May 4, 1998 letter that the preliminary plat had expired on April 1, 1998. However, as stated in the Division's September 1, 1998 letter, the Division did not provide any indication that the April 1 letter represented a decision or official interpretation that could be appealed to the Hearing Examiner within a designated period of time. The Auaust 18 , 1998 letter from John Bury to the Division can be interpreted as a request for an administrative interpretation on expiration of the preliminary plat, and the Division's September l, 1995 response construed as an administrative interpretation subject to appeal to the Hearing Examiner. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Page 6 ,•r.jr . v • , - • , . , • . ' • : Based on the above discussion, the Examiner finds that the current appeal is properly before the Examiner. 3. Merits of anneal The appellant, Mark McManus, as one grounds for appeal, contends that the appeal should be granted because he was a party of record at the March 26, 1997 public hearing held on the request for time extension regarding the Cambridge Knoll preliminary plat (PE-1696-93), and allegedly left the hearing with the impression that a time extension could be applied for within 30 days after plat expiration. It is not apparent from the record what the appellant may have heard at the Cambridge Knoll hearing to have formed this impression. Whatever he may have heard, during such hearing would be superseded by the Hearing Examiner's written decision approving a time extension in such matter. The Hearing Examiner Ordinance requires the Examiner to enter a written decision with findings and conclusions for all land use actions coming before the Examiner for hearing. The Examiner's decision on the Cambridge Knoll time extension request involved unique circumstances. This included an erroneous deadline for finalizing the preliminary plat stated in the Board of County Commissioner's decision approving the preliminary plat of Cambridge Knoll; the County's approval of a fnal plat for a portion of such preliminary plat beNveen such erroneous deadline and the correct deadline for finalizing the preliminary plat, without the County drawing attention to the erroneous time provided in the Board's decision for finalizing the preliminary plat; evidence of a practice by the County of routinely advising applicants of the time when their preliminary plat would expire, which practice had only recently been discontinued by the County when the preliminary plat expired; use of the word "approximately" in the Board's decision as to the time when a time extension would have to be applied for prior to the expiration of the preliminary plat; and certain inconsistencies between state law and former SCC 13.12.120 on when a time extension must be applied for. Under these facts, the Hearing Examiner found there to be a constructive waiver of the time extension requirerrients applicable to the preliminary plat. See Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision in File No. PN-1696-93. The only facts which are similar in this case to those in Cambi-idge Knoll are the use of the word "approximately 45 days" in the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision on the current preliminary plat, in giving the time when a time extension had to be requested before preliminary plat expiration to prevent the preliminary plat from expiring. At the time (and currently), state law required that a time extension be filed at least 30 days prior to expiration of the preliminaxy plat. See former RCW 58.17.140. In the current circumstances, Section 12.100.118 of the Subdivision Ordinance was applicable to the extension of time, which is consistent with RCW 58.17.140 regarding when a time extension must be applied for. Further, by attending the public hearing on the Cambridge Knoll time extension, the appellant would have kllown that the County had long since discontinued the practice of notifying project sponsors when their preliminary plat was due to expire. Under the above analysis, it was unreasonable for the appellant to assume that he had until 30 days after the date of preliminary plat expiration stated in the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision to apply for a time extension under Section 12.100.11 S of the Subdivision Ordinance. The most the appellant could claim in terms of detrimental reliance is that he had until the date of preliminary plat expiration to file a time extension request, on the basis that the Hearing HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Pace 7 Examiner Committee's preliminary plat decision stated that a time extension must be filed "approximately 45 days" before the stated expiration date, and that the word "approximately" is an uncertain term. Further, if the appellant understood that he had 30 days after preliminary plat expiration to file for a time extension, it would have been prudent for him to have filed a time extension request within such time period, even though he had been advised before the passage of such time by the Division of Building and Planning that the preliminary plat had expired. The other grotinds for appeal raised by the appellant is that expansion of the initial time period for finalizing an approved preliminary plat to five (5) years under sections 12.100.118 and 12.400.120 of the Subdivision Ordinance, adopted by the County in 1997, applies to the current preliminary plat. Since such sections of the Subdivision Ordinance are based on the current version of RCW 58.17.140, the appellant's argument on this ground depends on whether the five (5)-year time period for finalizing a preliminary plat in RCW 58.17.140 can be applied to the preliminary plat of Shelley Acres approved by the County in March, 1995. There are no Washinaton cases which interpret whether the initial five (5)-year period for finalizing a preliminary plat can be applied to preliminary plats approved prior to the July, 1995 effective date of the 1995 amendments to RCW 58.17.140. The Examiner's review of the legislative history of such amendments discloses no discussion of this issue by the State Legislature. It is true that the 1986 amendments to RCW 58.17.140, which expanded the time for finalizing a preliminary plat from two (2) years to three (3) years, contained language appearing to give retroactive effect to such 3-year period, while the 1995 amendments do not discuss retroactive application of the new five (5)-year approval period. However, the retroactivity language in the 1986 amendments appears to be flawed, in that there appear to be no examples of preliminary plats that could have received the benefit of retroactive. application of the three (3)- year period provided by the 1986 amendments, under the peculiar retroactivity language of such amendments. RCW 58.17.140 and sections 12.100.118 and 12.400.120 of the County Subdivision Ordinance can be interpreted in a manner that allows the appellant a period of five (5) years to obtain final approval of the preliminary plat of Shelley Acres, norivithstanding the conditioning of the preliminary plat for a three (3)-year period for finalization under the Hearing Examiner Committee's 1995 decision. Several Washington cases address the retroactive application of statutory amendments. The following statement summarizes tiVashington case law on such issue: A statute is prestcmed to apply prospectively unless it is renieclial in natacre or tcnless the Legislature provitles for retroactive application. A remedial statLtte is oite which relates to practice, procedicres and remedies and is upplied retroactively when it does rtot affect a substantive or vested right. State v. McClendon, 131 Wn.2d 853, 861 (1997). Also see State v. Bennett, Docket No. 41527- 1-I, Division I, Washington Court of Appeals, Slip Opinion dated September 14, 1998. A"right" has been defined as "a legal consequence derived from certain facts", while a"remedy" is "a procedure prescribed by law to enforce a right." This doctrine has been applied in the criminal law area to allow fihe application of a longer statute of limitation to the prosecution of crimes under amendatory legislation, so long as the crime was not already time barred under the HE Findincys, Canclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Pacre 8 ~ previous statute of limitation at the time the amendatory legislation became effective. See State v. Hodgson, 108 Wn.2d 662, 668 (1987). The doctrine has further been applied in the civil torts area, with regard to the amendment of a statute of limitations to provide a longer time for bringing the civil action. See O'Donoghue v. Stute of Washington, 66 Wn. 2d 787 (1965). In the current circumstances, the substantive right involved is the appellant's right to finalize the preliminary plat, while the time period for finalizing the preliminary plat relates to the procedure used to enforce such right. The extension of the time period from three (3) years to five (5) years has no negative impact on the appellant's right to finalize the preliminary plat or any vested or substantive rights recognized under chapter 58.17 RCW. At the time the 1995 amendments to RCW 58.17.140 took effect in July, 1995, the current preliminary plat had not lapsed under the three (3)-year time period for finalizing plat approval applicable at the time the preliminary plat was approved in 1995. The Hearing Examiner can find no public policy reason for not applying the five (5)-year time period to the subject preliminary plat, and such application brings uniformity to preliminary plats approved by the County which have not been finalized by project sponsors. Under the circumstances, the Examiner finds that the 1995 amendments to RCW 58.17.140 are remedial in nature and can be applied retroactively to preliminary plats which had not expired under a previously applicable period for finalizing a preliminary plat on July 23, 1995. This is a case of first impression, and the Division of Building and Planning caruiot be faulted for its interpretation that the preliminary plat expired within three (3) years after the date the preliminary plat was approved on March 23, 1995, or that such interpretation was not subject to appeal to the Hearing Examiner. III. DECISION . Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the Hearing Examiner hereby approves the applicant's appeal, and hereby determines that the preliminary plat of Shelley Acres will not expire until March 23, 2000, which is exactly five (5) years after the date the preliminary plat was approved by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. The time for finalizing the preliminary plat may only be extended by the filing of a time extension request under section 12.100.118 of the County Subdivision Ordinance at least 30 days prior to such expiration date, or no later than February 22, 2000 (tlzere is a leap year in the year 2000). HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Page 9 i DATED this 7' day of December, 1998. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER AZ O-z Mich6el C. Dempsey, WSBA48:0 NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and Spokane County Code 12.100.126, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on the appeal of a County administrative decision rendered on an extension of time request for finalizing a preliminary plat is final and conclusive unless within twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing files a land use petition in superior court and serves the petition pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW. Pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is mailed. This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant and by first class mail to other parties of record on December 7, 1998. The date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's written decision is therefore December 10, 1998. THE LAST DAY FOR APPEAL OF THIS DECISION TO SUPERiOR COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS DECEMBER 31. 1998. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 324-3490. The file may be inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision PN-1507-85/ZN-57-85 Page 10 • • • ounty Public Works, . • • • • ' • Section, D • • County • • Memo To: JOHN PEDERSON From: Scott Enaelhard c,~ Applicant: MARK MCMANUS Date: October 19, 1998 Project Name SHELLEY ACRES PE-1773-95 ZE-0007-95 S-T-RQ 24-25-44 . RE: 11 /04/1998 04/10/1998 The Transportation Engineering Section has no comments to submit concerning the appeal. Should the Hearing Examiner grant an extension to the plat all previous engineering conditions are still applicable. Kimball, Sandy- From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Thursday, October 08, 1998 8:26 AM To: Pederson, John Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Busko, Doug; Miller, Katherine; Sims, Brenda Subject: PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 - Mark McManus - Appeal of Decision 10-8-98 I received the above referenced application on October 7, 1998. I have reviewed the project file in detail and i find no evidence that there every has been any engineering submittal made to Spokane County on this project. There is no evidence that a predesign meeting was ever held on this project. There are no engineering plans or calculations for this project in the project file. ~G~ ~f' ► Page 1 ~~I ; ' • . . . . . ~ REQ/1'~~~'j ~~y~/~~p~y~1~~! ~+~lu ~11~~1l~ ~~L ~~i'M~ il 1 • • ~ I - ' ~ . , • • • - ~ $30m00, • i~ _ -I. . ' ~ • . DATE- 10 ~14/99 ~ ~ ~ ' • - _ - - . . ~~~D NiE COtrRTN~~ LANE CRP/RID N.AMEOF PLAT $H~~~~Y AGRES ~ . ~ . ~ . - P1at#'~~~1 7,73 . ADDRESS O~F BGDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT ~ 4 ~r ~ • BLD+~~ B9 ~ ~ ~ V ~ ~DERAL1SUM PROJECT # PRO)PC`t" LIIIVIITS. EMSTING +~ONDiTIONS: ~~OP~SED r~~~~MIBNTS , RO.~ ~DTH 1.61 (Private Dr.ive) ROAa SURFACE ~ _ . . . _ ~ ~phalt,_ . AVG. DAILaY TkAMC 20~ _ 30 A DT Catent Tr~'io Count Design Yew Tra~`'cc Cotmt : - F~OJECT DESCR.tPTION Sh eZ lo;~ 'Ac res a. s a 13.1 6t' .`olatw 'G our~ tne y Lane i s an c'-c'e s s l ar~ e to:f erve '4 of the l ots, A11 16ta ~rill hisue-f r onta~ e on Steen Cau"r t, . but t~epe-,-4 homes will be s$rved by Zane* ~1~C~~~►~~ ~~~I~~' ~~~'~►T~~N u ae o a 241 wi c~-e c1i~. ~`e,~r~. dro p ~.n a°~ eac1 Of c~x r~i,' ' - . . . retu.rns, (;Se~~ at°~~~-heA `ol'an. ♦ ' • ' _ ~ . ~ , ' • ~ • ~ ~ ~ i . ' _ ` . . . ft d . . w. _ . ' 4 . ~ ~~~~~Y~ I~~~` . Y.• ~ . . • , ' . J: ' ' . ~ " • VO~R~ Clir+U+~l,~ 4N1iJ'~t!f~l'i~l'M' ~"T ` ~ppy,~T a J~4~!lS~►( ~~wAT1L!L'J f , ~ ' ~ ' . ..V: ~ • , ~ ~ t - . . Ile- w~ro to1d at the beginning ` of the_ project 'Doug 13u~~~ ~ ~the:,Couht~~r~~ , E~.;.n`eers) ~Lhat the en,t~.~~.nce to -~he pri~tatey ~~.~~:~~r`~ ~~~u~~l ~lc~~~ ~3,ik~~ ~ • ~ dri~~~~y an,d ~iicat ha~~ ~~rb rett,t~~~s.. lyi~~tial :1'Y"-we- weroM, told t o r~ot.,~041!0 ~ ~ ~ . .a ~r i ~rew;s. drc?p~ _ . _ _ . . . , _ ' _ ' ' ' ~ i • , . ' ~ . - ~ _ . • ~ . . ^ .~~J , • , r • . . The pr ~1vate drive ,wi11 have liiit~~.'~ t-4a2 f . - . . . , res3.dential drivetTa+' • , . * . ~ ' r, ` y, y'" - . - - - ~ _ - . . . : . ~ . ''1 _ s n ` ~T i. -I' _ •'Y •t`~~r.i.h~ ' ' ' ~ ' . ' ,1. ~J' i ~ - ~ - . ' ^ - _ ' . ! , . . - ~ 1 'I ~r ~ I ~ ~i _ . ~ ~~I~ L+,+1UNTY E1'lSAINt~~ ~ ~ . , • - i . - :1~ ~~lP 3~~~ BY ~KETRO EI~`119EERING, 3NC " tiT o e ; ; . _ , , _ =t . S~~4~"~ED y ~ . E. - i~ . ` ' SS_ ' S,. S1~ertYlan, S~7c~,~1'6, ~C~ ' . t~~ - ~5C~9) -624~-~'351 , 'PHO ADNBNtgZVATM 'VAItIAN+GE FEE OF .~3QJM, PAIQ TO SPOKA,1`+1~ ~OUN'I'Y . 1026 W BROADWA"Yg SPOi~~E WA~99260170 PH+~~1E (5Q9)A~56•3~► F~ (509)324-347$ ~ -~QU~'!`'1~T.:L ~Y(~'~" DfE 1~~V.M'WW WItHOr.f'lC FUM)S.. ~ CAST3' H ~ ~4~ ~CME1~ BYff DA'TJ~ . . . . , . . . , ' . - . , - . , . • , • . . - . . . . ~ - " " . . . ~ ~ ~ . ~~~~~N ffAU &4 Approved Approved w/oondicions Nat Approved . P'raject Ma►nager Dat~ ~094mc.- &e.-- ,~'...G , ~ppra ~d Approved wlconditinns Not Approved / , . P'r0~ct MaaagernenC Engineer : Date . ,f , Approved Ap'pcaved wlconditions Not Approved . . , , Operations Engineer Date SFOKA1wf.~ COUNTY ENGI M`S DET~UNATIONi .ti ~w ` ~ ~ ~ • 4"~~ T n . I Approved wlno conditiom Approved as recommended abave Nat Approved { } a 4 ) , ' . ~Spakaz7~ Co Engineer . D►ate ~ ti 1- o+oo 1+00 Z+oo ~ 3+00 8' ~ RIP-RAP AT PIPE OUTLETS WITH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN. 50% OF RIP-RAP _ TO 8E 3" OR LARGER (d50=3°). MIN. 6" THICK. RIP-RAP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE a oo WITH SECTION 9-13.1 OF THE WSDOT/APWA ~ o 0o Z STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 0 ~o c° DRAINAGE PIPE o ~ . . . 3+00 . o~ $ i~ . . ► , . . ~ . Lj.-1044613"~; • ' ~ 4,P DETAIL 7 ~ TO SCALE ^ N ~ , / ~ 30' PRIVATE DRIVE EASEMENT STA. 0+92.00 ~ ~,°j ~ `j~~ W.S.D.O.T. GRATE INLET TYPE 2 (t PIECE BASE) W/NPE "A" GRATE ~rv ~ 6 0 ~ ;~kj'u~~~T.O.G. EL.=2045.28 ~ I.E. = 2043.08 54 L.F. OF 8" CPEP, ADS N-12 CORRUGATED PIPE (INSTALL PER ~ ~ 50' PAVEMENT TAPER TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION) TYPICAL ROAD SECTION ~ . ~ SLOPE = 0.70% 03A, -3038 STA. 0+39.89, 18' RT. ~ P - 0+'69.63 RIP-RAP OUTLET PER DETAI . I.E. = 2042.70 I , • - - . _ ~ . ~ 2046 STREET NAME SIGN, PER M.U.T.C.D. 204~15 , y f _ - .s~oca 24' DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER , ' ~ ~ ' . • • . . , 1 ~ SPOKANE C0. DETAIL A-7 ' _ ' . j -F • : r' • !~,~`r~' ;w• , o . • • . • • . ~"Q . oOT , . ~ , , r• , ~ `S • . ' • ~ i 7 • . •v••• • ~ . • ~ M oO+O1.. ~ . •~~Oj S I ~ r._ . v `I. • ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ~88'£6= - . .l < . ~ . ' r LINE TABLE , . ~ . ~ S.~.. ' • , BEARING ~ LENGTH 0+00 COURTNEY LANE _ xs ; ~ 10+79.48 STEEN COURT ~ ~ 2. ~sZ• N 75'43'46" E~ 59.63' l 9Z, ~ 4 3 CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ALL ITEMS OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL 6E COMPLETED IN ACCORDaNCE bVITH THE 5) IF THE COr1TRACTOR DISCOVE►":-- •nn~ rnrnorin~, rin.ic^ Cno D/\ Af1 001(l!'`C Ar.lf1 1 IIIAII!`10 NI I"l1hICTG'1/`TIf'lAI r!'eof11Tl/Zt,I0, rp.irri11N1TC(7r(1 Tt-!: .r . • , . . • , . . - - - - - , METRO ENGINEERING INC. ~ 2 2 9 3 3245 SH RMAN 28-8270/3251 SPOKANE, WA 99202 DATE ~ ~l• 7 ORDE~R OF t~C~ ~ K e~` 9sturity leetures ~nUua~C. r . ' ~ 1✓ T f~ V ~~.~..A~ e ~ . Dstalq on Osel, ;L r Spotaae Tearbeis Gedlt Ualoa • . ~ ' ~ - . - ' - r . • , Pou Omoe Buz 5261 Si7ffu R - . . _ - _ _ • _ _ , Spo]me, WA 9=5-0284 ~ - . • • • ),_p~ ~J/' b'L I-/C/V - ~ 11P o - FOR Y ~ . i: 3 2 5 L8 2 7001: L00 500 ? L L84911' 2 3 ; O WWLAND ~ _ , . . ' - - " • . . • a. ~ . . _ + . . . : - . Received From: a<00wr44 ReceiPt No. 10 7 4 9 5 ~ Address: , Date: 4&i*r -24 Cerff ~ ~ Acct. No.: P1~113 Amount Paid: ~ JCash: 0. . 4^ 0 Sales Tax: V Amt. of Acct: _ Mone Order: W ~ Y , Total Paid Z Amt. Paid Check: --Check# ~q3 _ 0 Balance Due: _ -Credit' Gard: ,~Exp. Date:-~ a - Purpose: ~ 4ri ~If1~h~J" Qj~•(Vfh~. L _tj u r,. ~4 m i .5..+, u , • Received by: NJ ' • . Kimbali, Sandy From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 1:06 PM To: Richardson, James Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Sims, Brenda; Miller, Katherine; Darrell, Virginia; Parry, Ed Subject: P-1773-95 - Marck McManus 3-2-00 I do think that drainage language has been issued for this plat. ew qeHrm4r.94. ps Page 1 ~ Received From: Rer,eipt No. 122308 Address: Date: Arnount Paid: z Acct. No.: lCash: ❑ , . M Sales Tax: V Amt. of Acct: ~ Q Money Order. ❑ ; Total Paid W Z Amt. Paid ~ ~ n .4 ' Check: Check # Y _ 0 ance Due: ~Credit Card Bal : :L-J Exp.,Daie: c~n Purpose: ~~ti/f~l~ ~~!'JT r~i~~~`~Y~' L{~/ 'r•.~•4/~./"°t~,-~~`. l773 ~ ~ r~lt.,y _ f.~~~ _ ~ ,~,.r , _ " Cy JY ~ / Received by: , ' MARK McMANUS 19-7076/3250 2854 OR ZOE McMANUS 5063024899 E. 14522 VALLE`(WAY 924-0968 DATE v;? '~P SPOKANE, WA 39216 PAY TO TH: $ OROF.R OF e ~OO ir OOLLAR$ _ ` . Washington Mutuai WasRington P.6utval 8ank SoOFane Vattey r~nartciai Center P.Q. 8ox 16587^ 1•a0a736-8000 syakaae. wA 99214 24 na,. cusumef sav,ce i00!~~~~~~ NOTES • - ~ 1: 3 2 50 70 ?601: 506oll 30 2L+89oll 911' 213 5It . , .f.` • - 1 O 8:~0-'S?01-0 , • 1399 1 i ~ CnTY gl,DGB„ptpr. , r0. 884 ~iZ . . - I r ~ ' . - ~ . , ~ p C` O Lt 14 'r Y ~ orveam Ma in.ns • A Dtrmu Cf 7fR PtJ= Wr,= DQwlTbawr ' 4 D.rilJ,%t ioeA, T Dimbw Wmtiee+ A ~oi~~, ~~.S.,~li~t1►7 f~~ ~ ~ M PRIaPi'TY FEE,AGRFYIWENT ~ AGREDAM . PI- `7 - . ~ mm bomeft ~~~y~ WILLIAM W. MAINi JR. . ta che pwf oct 3s E R ► 2 3 r d~ d,~, ~ '~l lJ N E , 19 5 9-.~a ~~~~c , t . , ►NEL~Y ACRFS ADDI.TION - ~ . ~ ~ • - - , - - . ~ livWuala uW _paitlw Wmed besem as 6iviag n'~oer~e~a~ia tba abo~Ye-desCii'bed pcvpettY or, Pq*t &am , Y requcsC tbm-pr&fc~► t~+P 0e Sfvmi~to Wr Qorjsct ~ . . ~D~t~e ~polc4t~e~C' -out~► ~t'pt.:pr~ec,t ~r"tlookfieea, ia ~.-speoi6edF3ta ; ~.a9,: 14 0f me ~~',an, Y.~C1_ode~~'~c~:fcia ' 11 Y y r ~ j_ _ 1~ti• '~t' 4..F. Ll l ~ li r~ L~ ~ t -`~!'~~1 ~~V~ u~• t~.,,L..'_'~c It' due~~ "mc ~~d ;.a~: ~►"o~e:' .~~les ~e±d Ql 'tbe Oo11ecQ4Q O~! "!s w'e~r~C' ~eco~mt, . r - ot 111. ~ r~~. . ~ ¢ _ , . ,.,j.~1i _ - ~ bc,- 'paid p~c~r~,:~:~;,~_` sc~o~e,~pRa~ce cf tbe pi~ec;t. 'fa T.~: .o a~~o~wd . . . , loc~'f11ed eoir*; ftilavaid balme~ &sl1 ba pW".withio'~30 ds" a! 9se iavoice . ~ . ~ = • ~ ' ft Md pM*IC 1"0 MtO Ot ft bWft is V=ifW • • fi~ AI f 1~. • • - • ♦ • OOt~~~F~- ~30~" ,41ql~~~vf ~D d. 'f IQ1!o~00 ~ - - ' - Y i~► y r ~r-s i .•---~e~ i-_ y Y`QF ~ f~~ d R~Q~.p~Q~t l~.npR pi~d~~•~30~ r ~ yL- ` y(+~3~~s. ~ 4_ ~ ~ t ~ / r~t _ ~i ;g : ;G'~L. 1 y~a ,-'r' ~ ~ - - bes;rev,s.C>m. p~v~ec~t~lao~ap~=ri~R~*be ooo~~oa~.~~~~s~ia~e,~incot~t~o_~Isace~'i~ patid, pid ~ii@i6~~6S tl ta~io~D ~oitz'tb~~i~ioa~af~;vt~ayyt- oo~6ec~loa Ro~ol~t+er~ ~c~iaiQm~~~tefn~alwm~t~ ` ~`~oo~t~l~~~ecboa~ ~y, ry~i,~'~~ ~ ~r2~4SI ~ ,~si _ ' 7 r.~, , r _ ~-rv~ ~ s-=rtit--: o z.. ~ eocpeata ioa~'ed~ by ~d~e•: Cotimt~l tbi~ 1ba,'COOocti~c+a ai : j. raue a~o~a.~ . . ,dwft~Y _bilIDg~*WLd be's+wi° m ft amatkm 01► ' . . . . ~NAM.: °~iW;'1 L~L.~I A~M W`~-. MA 1 N, JR - . , ' • _ _ _ . • . - . ~ T , _ ~ AD~R~9s~ 'N 0 R A- , S U I T E"E" "Y, si'A,~,. S'P~U`.KA N E~- W_A 99216 C~ . y. - s,- • ; : - . 1~09 ) 9~221- 3000 ~ ~ - f ~ r.- . . . . PmY~p:~t~iese _,.i ~tosy cesult ie dd~7 ~ IBUM ~ a F~'olsct or ~et , . . - , . kedl ib9 -othe~ - w~' " ,Spop~ot~;(i-~-• .~°.Pro}~t o'+~t a ~ ~ , = ~ ~ ~pal I~t dfe` xaim~I~ . ~pi;.•~i~~~ ~ ~ ` =,~~`'~4~~~ ~ ~ - •~ESa ~1~'~^ ~ A F" , • . 1~..~+ ~ / ~ ' , a . , ~~~~3~~~Tr• - ' , _ _ . ' _ . . ~ , L L_I_AM. W, :._:,,M~A~I3~N , J R. • {t ~ ~E 9 ~ ~ 9 - - - ~"•-s±~T y er'7-'T~Y~n ~ ; Y "t : _ . _ _ ari•q 0►w 81~, ~WA ~Aiaa'1?~ OW 4963M FAX: (M 324%V1f 'DW. OM 324-31ii . ~ • . • - . - ~ , . ~ • '.i~ ~~."iS~'k~.~R.~. ..L~`f..tl .~/~:.~A~'•a.•,. a . _ ~ ~ , u _ ' .:r" , . i - 3. . , ~ '<v ~ .,.n. ~ _ . ~ r: ~'i'~3i+t~ei{ x~ ~ Y+~v«. '1y. ! « ~ • Apr-16-01 08-05P P_02 ,IUr. 2a. t999 il :0i0Arf SP+C cnTti ~PIAr~ING ~ . ~ w0. 080 :/Z . . . r • I 1 ( p O 1G A N~. C O T.T N T Y ( ~ ~ D~v~ oi acaAt~c ~ tn.c~ ~ A Dlwmw 0 "a pvrx ~D ~.w~* wm~. Jo~ ~.i. cea~► i~n. MOSiTY I+'E8 AGREEbIENT ZNGV~'eAZZEDMT NUMMM ~ I `7 This betwm Quoty and WILLIAM W. MATN, JR. , whm wwatInOWNER 23rd &yof JIJNE ,1999 .~1 19 ,PPqC" t,dw proiecc , km,nu; SHELLY ACRES AODITION . nOt de bdlAdnals and p4to aMed bess hivin ea ~a ia tba am dde~ OMPM Of PwJ9a &R= Ao the EouowCtg: 1. luy requcs+t dw prlor* tsvbw Oo g!v'm oo Q& pwh=L a. Rebmbwee Spohte C=ny for pnppet ar+ie- ud ftometlm feea aa weai6eQ In Cbqm 9.14 of ine 9po~aae Cb'mcep Oade. Ue fm 90 ee boed ad dadA"M oon bkc 1+e4 byY 9po1ne CMA kt psoJeac revim plm cen pacew clsarp, aad •~iII De billed mondty u &aensed. wzW 6On ammob de, inc aey adet e~cme: }amTed m dm odl4cdoo of m weJdw woa-c~ =at bc paid pdw mds Cwoty's sscaQtreae of tbe pcojat toor H%%g. If s prvject b a*uowd aad/ar fllcd wifb s balmact sa'31 vwt*, fte ucQairl belt~ce ~hsD ba paid wdo 30 dsys ad oe tavaim dae. 3. The mm&rspod apma mw toe ieo at ft ma p.yabk upoo raa* a ft bfift aa opedfied ibave. t. AN tn~o~oa m paid 30 OM of 6e ievoice dw wffl be om.Auee~d delt+oquea. If mw ouaamdiaj balmce an tbs amo= fot dds po}ea 4me paid w*lw 30 drys of de ~aloe dsm, eo ssme= ie+rieos o[ ft pmJect doot=M wM be eoodtlCOed unell !bt aelite Moaa bdme it Pid. Aey bdmea en ft sacomR 6oc tb pCVjeot aoR paid .ia& 65 4qs of & Wvaks dw may rmA m lwal acsion dc ar kmoda of adw ooiftfon peooedtQa, hcloft "haal w a oollatim yeocy. 'Ibe Spo~nt vMbe 1Mte !knaWad all ~cpeata fnamed byt5e daaRy fbe dr oo0ocdm o[ , aver0ue saooum. s. TU moomly barmg dade be sm oc mw acomtiaa ai: . NAMR: WiLLIAM W. MAIN, JR. . ADDRM: 12810 E. NORA, SUITE "E" C27Y. SrATE: SPUKANE, WA 99216 ZIP CODE: ~ • (509) 9 2 2- 3000 iund=mld &at W1om to psy &eae bra mry resuk in deYy ia eooroa at apptvvsl d tbe pe+oject or omw pelme svcdoar. O Il d& Eee sp+ameat im camteoW bp raitocoa oier ffiauo *s Spoa~ac (i-s-, te Pwj8Ct o+rnes ot a pffoc,vl la Q1e am q aiis bc p~vje~Q. mb ss tbe Ba~ Oaipft fbe pwJea, 6ea avrskGhoelneioo ftom de 9poot4 ~r spdAeaW I lo' tbe Apd to aooa mY Ftie ApseMW is ~od m dw Fis A~o~ ~ SHWATVRF Dy:. WTLLIAM W. MAIN, JR. ~ (PM?T NAW ~ ~ ~imiwq Aw 9poir WA 9Md'170 O!! 40"M 'AX OW U"M =0 OM XW31ii , a , , ~ 4b y • ~ ~ ~ •11 1 • 7 ~ • . f ~ f,~ • " • ( ~ ~L . ~ ~T 'ki.h 1~~. , - ~ S p O K A N~ ~ ~ ; _.~kr - ~ I - ~ _ - - . ~ OFFICE,OF TYlE COUNTY ENGINEER • A DIVISIQN, OF 7'4C ~PUI3LIC WORKS DEPARIMENT - Ronald C. I-formann, P.E., County Engineer Deniiis M. Scott, P.E., Director ~ AGRE~M,ENT ''O ~PAY FEES ENGINEER'S AGREEMEN'T NUMBER I'Ilis agreement between Spokane C'otinty ancl A) ~ _ - , - , . ~ - n 1 _ . rsori), . , WlICISC Int,el'eSt 111 tile pCojeCt IS ~~;~p+~ -oA'~'- (i.a ownCr, ageiir, ctc.) . . . ~ , ~ , is enlereil; into tlvis clay Qf `rkq ,.1'~ 9 2 . iis ag . reement is, a.rr'licatil'e ~_r~oJ;ect . Tl . ~ known as: l; ~ l ~ ~ • ~ - ` ~ ~ i~.i~ A _ -WrnjZ_ _ c r-_-s_0r-Mcnant - i. - m er - " irties name~l ,hcteit~ as,,~iaviiig.an interest in tt~e.al~ove c~e~scri,t~ecl-j?r-rerty or , - ''t~at:,t~he ' ~nclivi~lua;~l~, and ~ ~ ro"cct ag , - rcc to the fc~filowing: J . . . : ~ 1 . Reimt~urse~~~-S okane C~unt for ~ ro'ecrevicw aind -~'ti's ectican fees ~s s ecified'i'n~_. t?- Y . J,-~- I? n . Y • C hapter 9., 1 4; o f t lte Sno kane C oun ty. -Co c~er ,Tlr6fees,:wi l l i N, ba se d o n,ac tua l,s a l ary cosl-s incurr~ed Uy Spokane County ~fo,r. pr0,jec~~ ,reviewan~ ! or- i'nspect~ions pl~us a tcn ~ ~ ~►ercent ac~ininistrative cl'iarge, ~~nicintlily as acc~rue~i. Any . , . . ' l~illirig atno~unts~, tc~ inclucie any late -,Fpes orR~any -,oother expcnscs incurrcd in ' tke ~ cali~eclion of an overcfue account rni,st. be rai'j.prior ~tti~ the C,ounty's accert~ance.~Qlf the nroject for filing. . . ~ . 2. Tiie, unversiSnecl Agrees that these fees a,resAc~e ~ancl~ ~~ayable upon' receipt c~f -tlie , billing as specified above. _ , 3:- ~ Any invoices nat paicl within~ 30 days _o,fA he:i n, Wi'ce ii'a~.te wilt.bc, subjecteci to aAare= ' fce char,ge 6f l°1o-per tno.nt:h (12%- per year,on~~trlie:~ui~,naic.i 'l~al'ance- of .1I~e accnunt ' ~ ~ , - ~r~ • I x~,}_ - ~,~an~i"any~,anccrue~i late fee charges.. I,n=-`AClciition;°~,if' any outsran,din,~; ~tia~lance Qn tlle ' i } ~S ~ _ - acc,o~un~t: fQr ;t~iis rroject is not,~ raid .wi.tliin"~'30 idays~-of;tlie invoice "d_ate,I no further, , - revi.ews o~F the pr9ject docun-icnts. wi-tl ~be,.con~ucteci;un'ti~l, tl~,e entice, account ;~tial'a~nce ~ - • _ • ~`r~~v~ ' n4 . >-t. ' ~ " ~ L'•. i • f ~ -,is=raicl. Any~bata~~cc on rtl~ie ~account ,fo~r ~lhis ~~~~~roject .n,~it ai,cl wit;l~~~~~n~ 6~5~ cl~ys, ~Qf~~tl~ie . ~ i invoice ctate in~y result in legal~actton oW t~he init~a~ti~on-of.,ot:her collection. proced, 108, • . ~ . . ~ incl,cidi.n'g ~rcferral 'to a collection ageney. ...7,1~e~Spo~nso'r ;wl be I ia~ile~ Fc~r an~y ac~~l a~ll ~ expe:nsc"s incurred by the Coun~ty ifor the coll~e°cl~i4n ~of-,.Werdtie~ accotints. - - - . 4. 'Ilic manthly billing shoulcl Ue sent lo lhe aCtention ofi NAME: M141AI- +~o R, 09 0 ~.4 r7a Aj ~ • ADDRESS: 12,9►~~ A~6 1?,vq ~ _ • CITY, STATE: /."o c ~-o Y\7 ~ ~ Z[P CODE: PFIONE 1~.z -Z f - - . . ~ ~ . - Vu~nderstand that- fail!ure to pay thesc fees may~result in dtla,y in comnletiQn or approval of t he project or ~ the"r pos'sitiie -sanciions. _ . ~ ~ . "If 01is !1f.ee ,s►Sreemcnt is ccampletecll 'Uyy, sQrneQne Qth-e~_r, tha►n ther,SpQnsor, (i.e.,, ttie-. . ~f ect, owncr or a, ~princiral in ithe f rm~ srons~ring~ tl'ie rr;oject),, such astlli>e E~ngi~iieer.,- ~~a, 'e'signing ~~tli~ p.r~ject,, then, wri~tten ' .au~tl~~ioriia~t~ion, froin , tli~e S~~~nsorW s~eciticul!ly . :,uulhor,t~z~ng tlie .Asen~t to execute tltis Fee Agreeriient '.is- attached to : this Fee- Agreement. 51GNATURF Qy: ' ` . 6v 16 61 t Olt) '44 -'1 t 0,V . . • ° . ~:s: .._.4 - - ;(PRINT NAM,E),, , , . . R~ ~RFTURNW Cni'Y TO 5IV~KANE COU,N'TY LN(:INEERS - . - -gte- - -,k~pV\aenicn,f_ce 8%20/Q3~ ~ . ` , • ~ : • . _ 1N.1026 I3raad way Ave. ~ Sj*kane;:;W/1..9926(1-0170 , (5(l9) 956•3G00 ];'AX,.1(50?).~~5G.L4715~ y , ~ S P O K A N E •,e';,~ C O U N T Y J UILDING AND PLANNING • A Dtvtsiotv oF rxE Ptfsuc Wofztcs DEPA RT~ ,rD AMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DElvtvIs M. ScoTr,~0ocTQ7SO SppKANE COUNTY ENGofo MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane Count c/o Sandy Kimball li-liolililiNimi!titi,-t!iwitw ~ po ane Founty Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority Spokane County Division of Long Range Planning; John Mercer Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski Fire Protection District No. 1 . Central Valley School District No. 356 Vera Water & Power WA State Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: October 7, 1998 SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of November 4, 1998, time 1:30 p.m. FILE # PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Description: Appeal of an administrative determination regarding expiration of Shelley Acres preliminary plat. (STR) 24-25-44 Sponsor: Mark McManus, c/o John F. Bury, Esq. Please review and return any comments to me by October 20, 1998. hrd Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHIyvGTON 99260 PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 4564703 TDD: (509) 324-3166 J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS: Application: File No. PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95, Appeal of an Administrative Determination dated September 1, 1998 regarding the eYpiration of Shelley Acres preliminary plat. Hearing Date and Time: November 4, 1998 at 1:30 p.m. Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Owner/Appellant: Mark McManus Appellant Contact: John F. Bury, Esq., Murphy, Bantz & Bury, 818 W. Riverside Ave., Suite 631, Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 838-4458 Address and Location: Generally located East of 12`h Ave. (extended) approximately 350 feet east of the intersection of 12`~ Avenue and Shamrock Street in the SE 1/4 of Section 24, Tovmship 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA. Comprehensive Plan: Urban and Suburban Plus Zoning Designatioo: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) Environmental Determination: Determination of Nonsignificance issued March 3, 1995 Related Permits: None Division of Building & Planning Staff: John Pederson, Senior Planner (509) 477-3675 HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES Hearing Process anci Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be avaiiable for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, ls` Floor Permit Center West, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.F~., weekdays, M-F, except holiciays. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of repruduction. If yau have am-y.,questions or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-3675. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn: John Pederson, PE- 1773-95. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3d Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260-0245. t APPEAL OF ADNIINISTRATIVE ACTION, 1. Appellant: Mark McManus 14522 E. Valleyway Spokane, WA 99216 Agent: John F. Bury Murphy, Bantz & Bury, P.S. W. 818 Riverside Ave., Suite 631 Spokane, WA 99201 2. File: PE-1773-95; Shelley Acres 3. Action from which appeal is taken: Spokane Building and Planning Administrative Action Dated September 1, 1998 (copy attached) 4. Relief Sought: Reversal of determination denying extension of preliminary plat PE-1773-95 5. No appeal form was attached to the administrative action. Appeal Fee is paid herewith. 6. This is a request for public hearing of appeal. 7. Basis for Appeal: Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order were entered by Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on March 23, 1995. The project sponsor subsequently installed- water main and fire hydrants (energized); natural gas lines; and electrical power. Preliminary engineering elevations were made, and approved. Sponsor proceeded to testing for on-site sewage disposal. Spokane Regional Health District examined perc test holes in August, 1997, and required additional dedicatory language to the plat. On June 3, 1997, Sponsor Mark McManus entered into a Real Estate Sale and Purchase Agreement, for sale of the entire project to Bill Main, Jr. Sa1e was subject -w feasibility study and financing commitment for certain improvements. Contingencies of sate._ have been satisfied or waived. Sponsor is prepared to close sale but for prelimsnary plat. Sponsor Mark McManus was a witness bef'ore th;z Hearing Examiner in ; eview of the request for extension of the Cambridge Knoll plat (PN- 1696-93 The Spokane Ccunty Hearing Examiner approved an extension of time for that plat. In that case, the Division of Building and Planning "informed the applicant that the preliminary plat expired on a specific date" and would not be reinstated, and that such determination could be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Mr. 1 not be reinstated, and that such determination could be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Mr. McManus clearly understood from that hearing that a plat sponsor could seek extension within 30 days after plat expiration. Based on this understanding, Mr. Russ Grant, on behalf of Mr. McManus, personally appeared at the Building and Planning offices on April 24, 1998 for the express purpose of obtaining extension of the Shelley Acres plat. The HEC order approving preliminary plat at page 3, section 8, states that the preliminary plat is approved "for three years, specifically to April 1, 1998." Mr. McManus and Nir. Grant believed that the request for extension on Apri124, 1998 was well within 30 days of April 1. Section 12.100.116 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance provides that preliminary plats shall expire "five (5) vears afler preliminary approval unless a time extension is approved for the project." emphasis added. Pursuant to Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, the Director may administratively approve extension provided there are no significant changed conditions and the sponsor has (2) (a) surveyed the lots; (b) arranged for public services; (c) obtaining necessary financing. All of these elements have been met by the sponsor. Contrary to Section 12.100.118, providing for appeal of denial of reyuests for extension, the County (Stacy Bjordahl) oralI'y advised the Sponsor on Apri128, 1998 that he "had no rights" and must refile a new application for preliminary plat approval. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of Spokane ) . MARK MCMANUS, being first duly sworn, deposes that: I am the appellant in the above matter, have read the foregoing notice of appeal, know the contents thereof and the same are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. ZMARK MCMAKUS SUBSCR3OBLD AND SWORN to before me this 04-~A/day of September, 1998. OFFICIAL SEAI lANIS E. POTESKY AtE 7F ~~A~HINGTON NOTARY PU6t1C - 5T ~ COUNTY OF SPnlCAnE Nota~ Public in and for the NAy Commission Expires SePtember 11• 2001 State of Washington, Residing at Spokane My Commission expires: <DC::) ~ t 1 I ~ ~ . . b. • , • , . • ~ . ~ ~ 01Q+I~N~~~M, ' . , 'k • , ' _ • * V3,:' p, ' . . , • , , ' , ' ,I ~ .~8. , . . . . ' . . , _ ~ y . . • ~ ' ~ , ~ , ~ ~ , , • , • . ' . • ' ' , . , . ' ~ _ ':;:t ~ q • . ' 1~ • ~ 'j~ , ' ~ ~ • , ~ ~ ' • •1' ~ . , r '.~:i~ '.t ~ • ' w' ~ . , ~ . . ~ ' ~ ~ .jr~t~..n'.~:~i„ '',d,',t':~' ~r~~.i~, , ~ . • , . ' . ~ ;'1.~~' r'~~ ~ i .7. ~ ~ • . . ' , , , • . ' , i. A': ~t• 't~f r Y~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ i. y ; ,{LN Y~.' ° . ~1 ° 1~,'f . . • • ' ' ~ ~ ' . ~ ~ r•,4' v ~'v' ~ h~. ~ :t+~. 4 ~ . i ,.f i,~~. '~~1 ' ' ; . ` , i ~ • • , . ' t ' ' ,I~~,i,'~: i•~l •;~a , r . .t • ~ . . ' , ~ • ' • , • „i•L~' :p . ~1) • . , , ~ ' , ~ •r,., •,,~,F~ . , _ . . , ; . . . . , • , ` ~ ~,I+ ~ ~ . : ' . • ~ ~.r. )^.'`~l. ~ . + , . . ' , I . , . • w J ~ ~ • . ~ ' . . . ' . • Q~ ' w d ' . 'va N + ~ ~ • ; , : ~ . , . . ~ , . O v/ „ - • ?~`q'i:> ~c,,~,}rE,~,~~';,w;,~~. ~ • ~ ^~a ct v4 i rq k "?'17~w► ` M~ °y ~ . , . ~ , ' • x ~Na~+~n , Q a - ~ 7,s - ~°r v', J•,,^ : J u ~ ~n, ~ 1 . dp ' Ob31S .r > `~r 04, : ' r'~; • 1 s4J~ ? , ftftft-... ~ Hemmings, Bill . From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Thursday, October 08, 1998 8:26 AM To: Pederson, John Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Busko, Doug; Miller, Katherine; Sims, Brenda Subject: PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 - Mark McManus - Appeal of Decision 10-8-98 I received the abov+e referenced application on October 7, 1998. I have reviewed the project file in detail and i find no evidence that there every has been any engineering submittal made to Spokane County on this project. There is no evidence that a predesign meeting was ever held on this project. There are no engineering plans or calculations for this project in the project file. ow q 4 . Page 1 \ ~ ~ y RECE-VEu OCT 0 y 1998 ~ sPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER S P O K A N E ~ C O U N T Y _ BUILDING AND PLANNI,UG • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTti1Eti'T JAMES L. VIANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR Dstvtvts M. ScoTr, P.E., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: QWAN M„ evelopment Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority Spokane County Division of Long Range Planning; John Mercer Spokane County Division of Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski Fire Protection District No. 1 . Central Valley School District No. 356 Vera Water & Power WA State Boundary Review Board; Susan Winchell FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: October 7, 1998 SUBJECT: Review and comments for the h~ rinb o ov~mber 4, 19~98., ime 1:30 p.m. FILE # PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Description: Appeal of an administra:ive determination regarding expiration of Shelley Acres preliminary plat. (STR) 24-25-44 Sponsor: Mark McManus, c/o Jo LTLsq. Please review and return any comments (me by October 20, 1998. hrd Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing ~ 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SP0ICANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PxoNE: (509) 456-3675 • Fax: (509) 4564703 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS: Application: File No. PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95, Appeal of an Administrative Determination dated September 1, 1998 regarding the expiration of Shelley Acres preliminary plat. Hearing Date and Time: November 4, 1998 at 1:30 p.m. Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Owner/Appellant: Mark McManus Appellant Contact: John F. Bury, Esq., Murphy, Bantz & Bury, 818 W. Riverside Ave., Suite 631, Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 838-4458 Address and Location: Generally located East of 12`h Ave. (extended) approximately 350 feet east of the intersection of 12' Avenue and Shamrock Street in the SE '/4 of Section 24, Township 257North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA. Comprebensive Plan: Urban and Suburban Plus _ Zoning Designation: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) Environmental Determination: Determination of Nonsignificance issued March 3, 1995 Related Permits: None Division of Building & Planning Staff: John Pederson, Senior Planner (509) 477-3675 HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing witl be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to persons with physical disabilities. Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be ava?1a.b1F; for inspection seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application f le may be inspected at the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, 1 S` Floor Permit Center West, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, between 8 a.m. and 4p,m., v~reekdays, M-F, except holida-ys. Copies of documents will be made available for the cost of repro.duction. lf you have.any q- uestiz,ils or special needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-3675. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260, Attn: *John Pederson, PE- 1773-95. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3`d Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA, 99260-0245. , APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION 1. Appellant: Mark McManus 14522 E. Valleyway Spokane, WA 99216 Agent: John F. Bury Murphy, Bantz & Bury, P. S. W. 818 Riverside Ave., Suite 631 Spokane, WA 99201 2. File: PE-1773-95; Shelley Acres 3. Action from which appeal is taken: Spokane Building and Planning Administrative Action Dated September 1, 1998 (copy attached) 4. Relief Sought: Reversal of determinatioe denying extension of preliminary plat PE-1773-95 5. No appeal form was attached to the administrative action. Appeal Fee is paid herewith. 6. This is a request for public hearing of appeal. 7. Basis for Appeal: Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order were entered by Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on March 23, 1995. The project sponsor subsequently installed water main and fire hydrants (energized); natural gas lines; and electrical power. Preliminary engineering elevations were made, and approved. Sponsor proceeded to testing for on-site sewage disposal. Spokane Regional Health District examined perc test holes in August, 1997, and required additional dedicatory language to the plat. On 3une 3, 1997, Sponsor Mark McManus entered into a Real Estate Sale and Purchase Agreement, for sale of the entire project to Bill Main, Jr. Sale was subject to feasibility study and financing commitment for certain improvements. Contingencies of sale have been satisfied or waived. Sponsor is prepared to close sale but for pre7iminary plat. Sponsor Mark McManus was a witness befure-- ilhe,Hearing Examiner i-ft _re.v-+.ew of f.he request for extension of the Cambridge Knoll plat (PN-I696-93). The Spokarie County Hearing Examiner approved an extension of time for that plat. In that case, the Division of Building and Planning "informed the applicant that the preliminary plat expired on a specific date" and would not be reinstated, and that such determination could be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Mr. r . not be reinstated, and that such determination could be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. Mr. McManus clearly understood from that hearing that a plat sponsor could seek extension within 30 days after plat expiration. Based on this understanding, Nir. Russ Grant, on behalf of Nir. McManus, personally appeared at the Building and Planning offices on April 24, 1998 for the express purpose of obtaining extension of the Shelley Acres plat. The HEC order approving preliminary plat at page 3, section 8, states that the preliminary plat is approved "for three years, specifically to April 1, 1998." Mr. McManus and N1r. Grant believed that the request for extension on April 24, 1998 was well within 30 days of April 1. Section 12.100.116 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance provides that preliminary plats shall expire "five (5) vears after preliminary approval unless a time extension is approved for the project." emphasis added. Pursuant to Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, the Director may administratively approve extension provided there are no significant changed conditions and the sponsor has (2) (a) surveyed the lots; (b) arranged for public services; (c) obtaining necessary financing. All of these elements have been met by the sponsor. Contrary to Section 12.100.118, providing for appeal of denial of requests for extension, - the County (Stacy Bjordahl) orally advised the Sponsor on April 28, 1998 that he "had no rights" and must refile a new application for preliminary plat approval. STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of Spokane MARK MCMANUS, being first duly sworn, deposes that: I am the appellant in the above matter, have read the foregoing notice of appeal, know the contents thereof and the same are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. ~MARK MCMAI4US SUBSCRIF3ED AND SWORN to before me this kq~-qday of September, 1998. OFFICIAL SEAL JANtS E. POTESKY f~ BLiC - ST~~TE OF WASHING?ON NO7ARY PU 1 C4UNTY C3~SP0KANE Notaf~ Public in and for the My Commission Expi« September 11, 200' State of Washington, --Residing at Spokane My Commission expires: a'i -1 l-~ c~U ( r SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER s~~~E1VED. MqR 2'71995 INTRODUCTION County fngffineering This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on March 23, 1995. The members of the Committee present are: Brenda Bodenstein, Chair, Jane Myers and Harry Gibbons. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Mark McManus, requests approval of the Preliminary Plat of Shelley Acres, PE-1773-95, to subd.ivide approximately 15.7 acres into 131ots for single- family residences and a Zone Reclassification, ZE-7-95, from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1). FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The property is generally located east of 12th Avenue (extended) approxi.mately 350 feet east of the intersection of 12th Avenue and Shamrock Street in the SE 1/4 of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2. The Committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record. 3. The existing land uses in the area include fanmland and single family residences. 4. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the azea. 5. The properry is located almost entirely within the Suburban Plus (S+) category of the Comprehensive Plan while 1.8 acres are within the Urban (U) category. The proposal is also within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) and the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The Suburban Plus category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of residential areas with large yards and open spaces. The Goa1s, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Suburban Plus category promote fill-in development within established Suburban Plus development areas and existing outlying comrnunities where utilides, arterials, schools and community faciliries have already been established. Residential net densities in the Suburban Plus category shall range between 1 acre to 5 acres per dwelling unit. The Urban (U) category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"city-like" environment which includes various land uses, intensive residential development, and public facilities and services (water, sanitary and storm sewer lines, police and fire protection, and other features). The Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category promote fill-in within established development azeas and existing outlying communities where utilities, arterials, schools and community facilities have already been established. Residential net densities should have an approximate density of 1 unit to 17 units per acre. ( t • The proposed density of approximately 1.21 acres per unit is consistent with the Suburban Plus category and generally consistent with the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. 6. The existing and proposed zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The Arterial Road Plan identifies 17th Avenue and Sha.mr+ock Street as Local Access Streets. 8. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) and Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1942 (ZE-60-42) and redesignated to Suburban Residendal-1 (SR-1) and Urban Residential-3.5 (iJR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal dces conform to the requirements of the existing and proposed Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) zone. 9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with and a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued. The Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS. 10. The legal requirements for public notice have been fulfilled. 11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the plat name and support for the proposal. 12. The applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassification is justified. Specifically, changed condidons include adjacent residential developments. 13. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies. 14. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. The proposal as conditioned dces provide adequate public facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. drai.nage ways b. public and/or private rights-of-way c. potable water d. sanitary waste disposal e. parks and recreation facilities f. schools and schoolgrounds HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 2 ' - r- \ The above improvements are either exisring facilities or will be provided by the applicant upon finalization of this subdivision as conditioned by the Committee and implemented by the various County agencies. 15. The Committee additionally findsJconcludes: a. The applicant agrees with and accepts all recommended conditions of approval. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL 1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest. 2. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. Upon filing the final plat, or a partion thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1), consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record. 3. The proposal shall comply with the Suburban Residenrial-1 (SR-1) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone, as amended. 4. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 5. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 6. A final plat name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. 7. Appropriate road name shall be indicated. 8. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to April 1, 1998. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 3 , - 9. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of urility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 10. The final plat shall ind.icate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Si ard and rear yard setbacks shall be deteimined at the ttime building pennits uested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The acks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are o tained." 11. Three (3) cuirent certificates of tide shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat 12. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 13. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 14. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department, and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of the final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 15. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The rime schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building pemuts within the final plat The airangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane Counry and the purveyor harnlless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 16. Tij final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: " e public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state th authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety 4 par p ' maent and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subd.ivision and the ' t shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire tion to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building 't for each lot." 17. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 4 , pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat" including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certif'ied on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system. 18. The Water Plan and the above four (4) condirions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 19. A survey is r+equired prior to the filing of a final plat. 20. Vera Power and Water requires provision of utility easements that are not co- existing with drainage easements. 21. Prior to approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. 22. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agxeement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall confonn to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 23. To satisfy the requirements of RCW 58.17.110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recreation and playgrounds, the owner, at his opdon, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to nutigate the direct impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, open spaces and recreational facilities within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and recorded in conjunction therewith. The agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 and substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recneation and Fair Department Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any pwrchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligation within the voluntary agreement 24. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Tide Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 5 special conditions imposed as a result of approval of land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the cond.itions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frazne as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A B'~,lding Permit Or u,g,e Of The Prq=KZLA&ProUU 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construcrion andJor the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction andlor the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direcrion of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 01. 4. ~ tn M. th pr- ► - • ~ ~ ~ 1.1 A development pennit shall be obtained from the County Engineer e ore construction or development begins on any property all or a portion of which is in any area of special flood hazard (reference Sgokane Counry Ordinance No. 88-0521). The following statement shall appear within the dedicatory language of the plat: ~ "Devel ent within this subdivision shall conform to the requirements of the Nario Flood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spokane County Code. Purc ' rs of the property in this subdivision are warned of possible flood.ing or po ' g and the potential requirement to purchase flood insurance. This warning sh cairied in each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all p within the plat in the area of special flood hazard. 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all impmvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. BEC Order for PE- 1773-95 Page 6 ` - 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a perinit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 7. All construction within the eacisting or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as-built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. No direct access from lots to 1/2 Rights-of-Way until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 9. No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 10. Road design, construction and drainage control for 1/2 Rights-of-Way and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the developer. 11. Individual driveway access pernuts are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 12. yA Aeop~6 mm, tQ U~~. 13. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 14. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 15. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his/her heirs, assigns and successors. 16. The .~o. ~n ~ . ' ~ ► ~ ' t ~ ~ , co' tniand-e pAvA nt ako 17. The proposed subdivision shall be impr+oved to the standards set forth, 's ,olone si.oas amended, which reso ution esta s es regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 18. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has deternuned that the impact of this proposal upon the exisdng county road system warrants the dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 19. The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligation for HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 7 adjustments or relocation regard.ing these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to detennine whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 20. Applicant shall request dedication of the 1 foot strip prior to any final plat approval. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned in compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Heal District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application a a1 and issuance of permits by the Health District. 3. 0 h new dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-wide ection systems. 4. A dry sewer connection to the future area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. 5. If there are any public facilities on or through private property which must be maintained by Spokane County, then a Public Sanitary Sewer easement shall be shown on the face of the plat and the dedication shall state: "T'he perpetual [exclusive] easement granted to Sgokane County, its successors and assigns is for the sole purpose of constructing, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing, and all other uses or purposes which are or may be related to a sewer system. Spokane County, its successors and assigns at all times hereinafter, at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops, brush, grass or trees that may interfere with the constructing, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing, and all other uses or purposes which are/may be related to a sewer system. The grantor(s) reserves the right to use and enjoy that property which is the subject of this easement for purposes which will not interfere with the County's fu11 enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided, the Grantor(s) shall not erect or construct any build.ing or other structure or drill on the easement, or diminish or substantially add to the ground cover over the easement. The easement described hereinafter is to and shall run with the land." 6. Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for: Dry sewer connections for review and approval by Utilities Department prior to issuance of permit to connect. HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 8 7. Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of public facilities/double plumbing/private connection/dryline connection. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record andJor any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utiliry companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the sarisfaction of the Spokane Counry Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorides, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protecrion district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conforrnance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to applicarion for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor hanmless from claims by any lotltract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 9 , 10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots. 11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Of r, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 12. dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application proval and issuance of germits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized." 13. /tems edicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water is prohibited." 14. Th ~ al plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water sy' je ' pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, th' oc~fire protection district, County Building and Safety Departrnent, and water p eyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide f~ individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to ~ e of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot." SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior wall protection, and energy code regulations. (Note: The Department of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building pernut.) SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollurion regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolirion, construction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of acrivity during certain weather cond.itions. Haul roads should be treated, and enussions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction-related activities. 3. SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.). HEC Qrder for PE-1773-95 Page 10 , 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc...) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION & FAIR 1. See Planning Department Condition No. 23. CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. See Planning Department Cond.ition No. 22. VERA IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1. Project will require uriliry easements not ccexisting with drainage easements. HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 11 ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, APPROVES the application of Mark McManus for the Pr+eliminary Plat to subdivide approximately 15.7 acres into 131ots for single-family residences and a Zone Reclassif'ication, ZE-7-95, from Urban Residenrial-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) as described in the application PE-1773-95fLE-7-95 known as Shelley Acres. Motion by: Jane Myers Seconded by: Harry Gibbons Vote: (3-0) UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE T'HE PRELIlVIINARY PLAT AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FEARING E R COMIVIIITT.'EE HEREBY ATTEST TQ THE ABOVE FINDING , RDER AND c . CHAfR C ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director A le'.w B J HN W. P ERSON Senior Planner DATE Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal, preferably on fornas designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Comnussioners, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$215 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer. If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at (509) 456-2205. HEC Order for PE-1773-95 Page 12 . &YVVM - - ~ r:(J ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ or ~ I q 1 . O 1~' ~ • ~ V - ~ \ ~ C ` i ~ ~ , • 1 ~ tLIt) J C;) 1?r L~~ _ • r3 ~ 5 - ~ . ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~2 ~ 46 PENR 1773mag 7wn95 ~ ~Ri ~Z ~4V u ~ K , ,U ~ . GO(_, . , S PR ,qGUE --._.4.. . -c ~-L~~Z • ~F.1- :i: . AF'' R.R: ~ ~:s` o ~ _ r _ ' - . - ea ''C _ ~ • ' . ~ -f bt ~ ~ ~ r; . " - ' . ~ , - , • . r ~ , . ~ .3 ,Ro . ' ~ ' ' . ~ _ . . . 2 ,►d a~ ~ W N • -I, f .r ' us BrT'D C ` , ,IQI: ~.YE, ~ . ~ . - , r t,~~ N, 4 S E v~ ~~...r . I . . 4.04 17. t!'L Lj? r ` O ~ ; V . "~`•~r'r~ Yl . . . i ~ . ~ ~ ~ • . ' . a . . • . f• _ , ' • . ~ ~ • ; ~ ' ' . , ~ • _ - :BTFI~ '~~.~►E. ~ ' . • i • - c~ ' . ~ • ~ ~ j An ~ _ . ~ . . . . ~y ~ `•i':~~ii; ' • . - • , ' r ~+.i;:.;, ~ , ~ ~w f :v ~::~5:;~: `t•:~ . " , - . "`r, ~ f ' e ~ : ;::::,t';;; x:: • . ~ 2 7h q,~~;.~r`:;::~:ti f::;;;;~;.:: . ' • ' . ~F.~;.. . • . ' ~ . ~~~'~~:;:•;;.;;s,:;'~~'~ ~ . ~ .t;:. . , . , . . L~ ~ ~ ' • ~e. f _ . ' . . ~ i - . . ~ . . k `r ' ~ ' • . ~ • ' ~►+a _ ~ ~ 1' _ ' . ~ ~ ~ : - . • . ' r~ ~.~"L ' " . • • ~ • ~ . oa.~ , , ~ . , • ~ , ~ QQ~s 10* . . ~ JO }i ~ • ~ p F 1 • . . • ~ ~ ;J ~ ~ . ~ . , ; . ' . . . 9P'~ _ c r S~~Q~~ . . . . . . , J ~ •r • ~ ,.E, 3en ; . , • • • J~ c° Q ; ' , ~ • ~ . _ . f , • . _ , . , 3/95 HEC S ta ff Re ~ . p°rt for PE-1773_95 ~ Pa 9 81 . PE,?1773-95/ZEm m95 , o . ~1 l ~ e-2 ~n U u , 2 M 1 N 8 _._.-Al ~ . . e uR•22 B-2 B 2 B_ B3 es ~R_ ,U • - ~ ~ " ~ ~ L~. ~ • . 204 9. ~ 9 3 ~ c+ m (~2 ~ B- R R c.;o„ £ - ~ - . - rFt2i UR-? ~ . B -2 . • ~ , , 3 RD c UR-7 . I` ~ UR-3.5 z -a-T ~ c w A yC. UR-3.5 A,Dr E Qn - , , ? 8 , ~ ELl_E 0 9 Y~ ~L.4KE ' . f 1 \ 8TH ~ _ ~ ~ . . .3 ...,.1 , . :1 • • : . t~ . , ~i;, w ~ . ~;:'=<:%••=.;=.`{.'i::::.i T ~ . : :s:::;: ' ; : € ' y ~ n ' T ~'i:,'~i;, y , _'1 W ' . ;k:. , E Q,~ MT . , ~r ~ . . . w ~ . . ~ • ' ~ ~ ~ . C 1 ~ • C Qs~ ~ ~1 • , i . - • ~ S ~ ti •3` } t . ,~Q~• ' " - N L~ sRal ~ ,y G•~ i% ~ ~ s . ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ • i. f- , ~ p • ~ ~ ~c.Y, ~ • ~ l ~ Co _ `~3,~~-. _ _ tQ~i:__% ~~f~•~- ;b• - ' ' ~ - ~ ' ~ 'J r " ;a„',p ~ L \ _ • \ Page 82 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 , 0 46 PE=1773w95/ZE=7=95 . . • • L • 'R \ s~' ~ ~ ~ 'c ~ : ~ --~;.`o ~ ~ • k \ o ^ ~Y :yr~.--r. _ ~ • • a e J e ~ . ~~v • .p' . ~i a. • ~ ~ • - • f: o a•»W 30io , 1 ` ~ ' e ,t• ~RQ j • ' l - : MlSS`ION _ • , c ~ ~ • yfD '"8 M ~ -Lr.~l~ • • . • . . . v . • ~ - `~C\ _ ~_'~e pp • . ~c• ~'T~o~.~~~~.~~• J' • ~ ~ , ~.y • ' J v ' w.~ . . ~ ^ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • i ~ r . . ~ . . _ p.•Greenacres : : z.-~ . . ' . . . ' • . ~!'i. . • ~ ~ r~ ~~t. . - • _ ~ • c ~ 10)1 . °il'•"r="_ • A ~ , ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~a ' . ~ " . . . • . . ~ . . . • • 1U30 3} • ~ . . ~ . ~ 2 ~ - ~ ( • :i 18 . v. ~ - - . ■ . : .'r'~'T«S ~ T ^'~J ^ O ~ ~~_lf G : C~ -:~~t '1~' ^?S].- ~ 1 • • Y • ' • ..~I • « O • • • 0 . ~ ~ ~~~*h • ~ 1.i ~ ~ p ` O O A~ O o ~ ~ ~ ~ • : O ~ • • O • • • ~ ~ ~ •~~r~~~~~• • ~ • • •1 . • p 1 • , 0 _ •l i~i~ • ~w• • • ~ • o _ .~y : ,'i~i~~iTi~ -1 ' ~ W IOJ1 ~ • ~ • ~ o r • ~ ~ . . • - ~ ° ~ ~ ~ . • ~ , ••'N a ~ ~I~ • ~ i y~ ~ - ]C ' D~` •i • ~ ~ ~~I • ~ J • • f, - - O_ .~.?."..t ~tlT.-:,'~. . ~ ~1. ~ • U ~ ~ • ~ • •~~;Y ~ ~ ~"'ii.~~~:• • w.*••• ~WAY • e • • ~ • a o o ' f • • ° ~ • t • ~ h piO ~ ~ , / ' • k i • •(eM ~ • • . • ~«ZO3t , , , n ~ t . ~ • ' ~y jV' : •r • . ,,t 0 ~ VsI ~p ~ • . • A • ~ „ . ~ . J. . • . ~ ~ . , ~ p ~!o , •~'M. Ve~e ~ Y JVL L ~Id~• • • • ."~l I • AN a• . ~ • • N we.• • • •o ~.~f..•~;.~.. ~--~__._J - ~ • . • • rr~. i '~~~~,'4iii ~ ~ •~~L• • ~Q~' • ~ . • o~ ~ o i : i ~ ~ ' . • y d ~ • . ' ° ' o 'SPRAA~/~ ; . ~ O ~ ~ . ~ ( ~ f • ~ . . ~ j~~ca • • ~ • ' ` ~ MM • ~VP~oi •1 ~ • ~ 1 i • ~ P~tx p ~`H'4. ~j ftt • • i , j~ . • ~•~M• • ♦TN ~ •i AYCv:.~+" ~ ! t.•_ ~r • •~.~5:. .a~ .~r `~~:~_rr.::; v-••~•Z• i . . . . ~ i.; 1 'r Park . t•. . i.'. _ ~ o s o a _-:r-~ ~ ° . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .x ' S i • o • e . . C~ ~ 6 • ~ ~h _ ' jt)60 • - ► . - ' ~ n.• r4": _ . 2020 i ~ i ' " . ~ r .D I • ~ , " ' ~ ~ .r ~ - . - . 'l ~ 2 9 • . . . . , . 24 r . i- t . ~ . . . . • . . , ~ . i ~ " ; Akw • ~ MSnt Oisoes~i - ~ G tow 1 y!. , ! ~r ~ -_.7,.,n:~, P1(A r ~ . ;I~____1i . ,.j~ .t~:•'• C> ' ~ h ~ • • • r ' ~1I~6 . ~ M r ~ ~ . • . . . , i . . . . .a~ C ± , ' . ~ ~ 1•i.•.•.'.•.'.•.'.•.:•.•.•.•.•.'.'.•.'.'.'.'.• y ^~i'l~ ~ : y • •f:•: ' • . ti . Pit eQ~: ~ . ,~►'••'''.'.~.;t:;:~•'•''•: , ni~'~'•: fa • AV~~ .Y.`74' .TT'!7'!l.4~.T.'TT~ ~ ~ ~ `1 •I . o i . ! ' ~ ' l. ~ ' . .i~'' . t.'.'. , : ~ : , ' .l1•.•.•. . . . . ~ ~ .J. ~I .i•.'.•. . ~f:.,.•.• k Z - - . . !0 ~r s: ° ~ - _ . ' ~ .'T'~ • . . ♦ • . . . . . . . . ~ ~ , . ~ y`.~ , .•o 'f:.~.~.~.~.~:•::l:•:•.•.•:•.•:•.•.~:•:•:•:•: t• 3 ~ . • ~ '~c: :t~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~: b . • ~ ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ . . . . . . . . . .'~:~:~'~'~'~'~'~'~'~'-'~'~'~'~7; ~ ; • , . .:~i- N(..... ~ . • • •/I~~ ~Q • ~•t' ~ .t.'.'.'.'.'.',~:.~,~~. . . ' •~J.'.'.'.~'1.'.'.'.'.' . . ♦ .:a- 1 ~ ♦ . ~ .7C: 7,: ` ~4TN " ~ ' %~Ar ~ :i+: •i.•' . . . ' i' • , . ~ i ; ~ ~ •.y • • S; ~ . •.j `i: ::1 ;f ~ ~ ' ~ ( • ' . Y'`- :~i.13a1~'~'~...};...};... . . * • ~ ~ ~ ' ~ • ~ . ~ . , r~ ~ ~ ' ; : . ; - . 7~ . : I ..i. . .1~'•••• ~ I 1 • ~ ' ~ •'i;t' ~ . f , . . . . ' ~ . . L•_• , ~ f ~ I. 1 r ~ T• ~i. .~.~.~.~I%;•;•~•~.,.;,;':•;',• , ~ , . . . . . . . . . ~ • BM - ~'s:•:•:~:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:• ;Y ;G•on . . • . • . • ° • 2057 ~ , ~o - ~ . ~ __-~,e • 2129 : • ~ • . . ~`0 , • i~ ' P A r . 1Jr~. , • , n ~ ~ ~ . ~ 1 I I ~ / \ •Y 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 83 . % /=95 i - PE773=95/ZEm` ~ ~ ~ • N~r~ . •'y F~ ~ ~ • v . ~,.li . +_`IILT ? Greenacres • ~ . , .n. . ~ ' ~ o u . . • . ' ~ ~ ~ 10.~1~~ ~ . •t~• ' ' ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ . , . . . • 2030 ij ~ os~ 2oL0~, -"`~w■m+ ' ' ' ~ • i; , l~g ■s la ~"Eft , . . . . . . s.~ .I~i~.J~ ~ • t . . - - ~ , ~ „y: ~ ~ ~ I'r~iKrv•.~ , fT~'1 ! 1 ~ • . , . • • _ . . ~ • ~ .sc h ' 'J* t ~j'. . i• ' oJ „ • ' . •i • _ ~ , . . •i:•. i Y . • v~~Y~~ : , . ~ ~ ~ l --1 ~ . . ' r~ 3:~:'ii ~~++~r ' . .o VALIfY ~ ~ T. ~ : • ~ . WAY . u ~ jr {lIk+ ' . ' • . : ~ . . y~'~~/yytt/~~~\~~ ~ • ~ Pp . . • , . ~~//,,JJ~~%// f\]j1J~(j~~V~J ~ :20 18 ~ ~I .1 • • • V ~ ~ / ~Ti . ~ ~ • . • 1 ti/ • ~ , Veradale _ ~ •.ti"6u6. "66W, J •&t ertF . ' 'Ai: .w~~ . I. ~y . . . . • ~ . . . .~11 ~ . ..y~ ~ . . • . • Sp• • G~ • JO<5 ' . . ' ~ ~ Gravel Pit.. n i~~. c ~ ' i,~~ii~ • / , ~ (V'diler • ~ . . , . ~ ~ . t Park ~ . . . . ~ ~ . • . . Q ~ ~ ~ ~t1~ • ~i . ' ~ . 1f>6~ ; ~nt / 1 . • - 1'g ' ^ ~ ~ ' ' - t'i• ~ 'nlrnl Vell„~ 2`'~ I_' - - • \ . . , y • lC1Hi • ~ ~ IiiKh:trh x I ~~Sewd e DiSp0521, d s \ Gre~'' / . . I w ' • ~'~2:::'':~:•. 2 • i C-) . . . ~oah ::fi;?~::~:: ~ ' . cr .ti ~a pit~ Q ~i ~ l ' ~ I z C► m eM ~ . ~ ~ W r ~ 208:~ ~-~+--~,0~■~1■~ ~ ~ . . ~ i ~ . . ~ . Q wace. { • Ta ~ . 110 ~ • ~r~.~ ~ ~ _ . . . . • . . ~ . !:.AVe 2 , , • r,.. i~ • • ; . ~ ~fl ~ ~ 4~ ~ • x236/ 2~Q0 . : ' • - ' . ; . • , ~ ~ ~ Ak Il' . . . ~ U C . ~ u •J ~ ~ ~ . rrGrange' 5 ~ N a I I 8M tA • I a C . . 6 ~~6p j'~' • ~ 1 l,oo." f ~ - . ~3.J/ , I~~g~ ` (FREEMAN) ~ R 44 E k 45 E lO' •w n w r. 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE•i773-95 Page 84 q61~T KY M I SHELIEY ACRES ADDI710N ' wrt or r in It ul 8 in rmta 24. tanuoU n.om~ • wat u e+M. n m camm or uaug, mn m wkNneta. ~ i W ~ r = 1 ~ L m ~ n it6::EIVE:l ~ ~ FEB 81995 Itlt -11,7 6VOKANII COUNTY }tilL IMt AMA 13 r.,IIAC OfPAHTWLNI ~ f wns nwn a ur~ . mcm• ~ o~m. ~ rrue (D .~m rorns ~ ua it +n n. couu or ng 3e. u4 or m 24.114 m im- . ~ fIOi I1. fOwAI/IAO I~ 11 ,OfTt, AaYGf 11 nM. TIfIG ~.0•71'71•3 ~ f11.11 R1t Ttl YIR UY 0t YW 11.114 12.1 /1 A Rt t19~ O " IOtR Q7 aGIOl10 0f 111! al[tIRIW. ' OF p rmc~ ..ru~u•~. ~n~.m rtm e~^ 0.44 ~u•n•~.~~~.»•rmi ~4* ne~ S,n•u•01-2. ~n.~rrtni O T ~~OT tClics ~.a~n»•r. ~w.ovmti tuya 0.6rttaiw~ ~tieo nct~ nna ~.n'n'71't. IId1 /IR t0 tun ICa. 4 "~1 • ~ nn w , = rm m uoanaam or O a ru misR a trowa "o Bt.n a+wnuci.. Spuo .•u~[t. .tGM. ~ ~ . m i fsAf ~b1f ~ lflY. 1'•110' " ~ I I t ~ ~ ~ , YYY•~~. • V - rXtl•IIY. 111111! . ' . . ~.~•u.~Ihj ~1f1.11• ~ ~1 ~ ~ W ~ . ~ • ~ . IlN.ll~ ~ ~ 1171./1' ` tn ~ ~i ' . t!(4N ~f ~R . ;t ` ' pwif ~J tt~61N 4 I ♦ ' ^ . •~w.'e~+rrie F p ~ ~ i , S • = i . ~ ~ s , ; 4 'y~ I .e n w iu. ~1 \ • t.rah~~i. ~ ! wr \ ~b.a• I ~'l ( . , . .IRp •rr~~ ` I i a• w.u i».tr u~.~~ ~1~~\~! ~ ~~'lt _ \`~'~~••w~= ` _ ~1 T - ` 1 ; 171d,• 1 , , I \ \ • . \ 1 1 ~ I j ` t qn~ / ~ ` )))11111aaaCCC 4 • /aY11 1 ! ' ~ .wu.a• ~ / i . ~ ~i : ~ I l\:' M 1 • 1 ~ \I 1 G 41~N~ ` ~ ~ ~ + r u~~ •:i. ~ `1 1 ` ~ ~~'l 1 twnrl , ~ ~ ` "w ~u~m~ 1~* W~ u K~UtN nra a 1 i ~ i~►Nq•y N. \ \ , • _ _ ^ • ~ ' 1 I ~ 1 \ ~ ~ ~ 2: y er ~ ut• " `~~i~.. ~ ~~N wi.n. + I g G , -STEEN w nr~au• ~ ~~::-•i.... . r i,~,+' • ~t ~l,'~A ~~i.` . ~ N'.w . ••ui.h•' . A~ ♦ ~ ~n~~~earru... ~ ~ ,I ~ ` • • ..nuu~: ~~~1 `LN. ~r~ . .I~~j.~f~C,,1• ~ I~ ~ui~t~ : c J \ _ ~ .v, ` ; , . . ~l . , il , ~ ~ ~ ` : : .ti ~ ~ ~ 1 i. `.~~.il~~ \ \ • ~W~~ ~ '4 • ~ + ui.~ ~ S tw i ~ ~ O \ 111i ` \ ~It \ . 11 ~p Y 1~~ ~ 1 I ~ ` ~p 1 L t ur ~ \S ~.a .a. I ~ ;.r.. _ ) . _ ».u• W .~'~'r= ` ` ~ ~ ' ~ \ -I 1,~ \ I~ ~ ` •li. ' r~ wuan ~.11 11'717. ~ ~ j _ alql'ry~ ^Y.` v 1 1 ~ ~ir n. in.u.+ ~ ~ ~ ~•6 ~L~ ~ wniimu~ u.~~ ~ \ L n~.n• L lr.. . 1c~~~"+ 'wr.r. 11 ! ~ + mu• i A A / ' ~ ♦ I`~ ~ ~ 1 1 rur.n.1~✓ I ..rtrw•c: ua.uI_~ f M . • ~ q I~ ~ ~ j b ~.ru~7~7. ' wa.n~ ur ~ ~ M~ ~ ~e ~ ,I tJl i • ~ (e, •?~9 ~ y I I _ i~ ~Y°O ~ rrwi~ .mu un rmw ( Nr l~ ~ •~;~w • ,~w ~ , . , ' _ _ ' ~~J . LAND-MARK SURVEYORS . ..ru•n~~n~.ti~ ~ 414 aw IGW. I••111•~"'~' I~ I • UIi1 8. ONOLO101 AiLICI. a@ICi1/r WMI- I t•111-I11•1111 , ~ ~ . . PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: MARCH 23, 1995 SUBJECT: PE-1773-95, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHELLEY ACRES WITH EXISTING SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL-1 (SR-1) ZONING WITH A ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, ZE-7-95 FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL•3.5 (UR-3.5) TO SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL-1 (SR-1) 1. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Mark McManus Ben Simpson 921 South Monroe Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 455-5411 Surveyor: Willard D. Boatwright East 18828 Broadway Greenacres, WA 99016 (509) 924-3905 Contact Planner: Kenneth Kuhn Location: Generally located east of 12th Avenue (extended) approximately 350 feet east of the intersection of 12th Avenue and Shvmrock Stneet in the SE 1/4 of SeCtiOn 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: Preliminary Plat to subdivide approximately 15.7 acres into 131ots for single-family residences and a Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1). . II. SITE INFORMATION A. Site Size: Approximately 15.7 acres Gross Density: Approximately 1.21 acres per unit , B. Comprehensive Plan 1. Land Use Plan: The property is located almost entirely within the Suburban Plus (S+) category of the Comprehensive Plan while 1.8 acres are within the Urban (U) category. The proposal is also within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) and the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 86 . Suburban Plus category is intendeti to provide the opportunity for development of residenrial azeas with large yards and ogen spaces. The Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Suburban Plus category pnomote fill-in development within established Suburban Plus development areas and existing oudying communities where utilities, arterials, schools and community facilities have already been established.. Residential net densities in the Suburban Plus category shall range between 1 acre to 5 acres per dwelling unit. The Urban (i) category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"city-like" environment which includes various land uses, intensive residential development, and public facilities and services (water, sanitary and storm sewer lines, police and fire protection, and other features). The Goals, Objecrives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category promote fill-in within established development areas and existing outlying communities where utilides, arterials, schools and community faciliries have already been established. Residential net densiries should have an approximate density of 1 unit to 17 units per acre. The proposed density of approximately 1.21 acres per unit is consistent with the Suburban Plus category and generally consistent with the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Arterial Road Plan: The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifies 12th Avenue and Shamrock Street as Local Access Smeets. The County Engineer has required dedication of 50 feet of addidonal right-of-way along Steen Court. There is no Future Acquisition Area (FAA) requined for this proposal. 3. County Parks Plan: The nearest county parks are Terrace View Park and Sullivan Park. Terrace View Fark is located approximately 2 miles west- southwest of the proposal, at Blake Road and 24th Avenue. The Park is 9 acres in size and is equipped with picnic facilities, piay equipment, ball field, rest rooms and swimming pool. Sullivan Park is located approximately 2.2 miles north-northwest of the proposal, immediately west of Sullivan Road on the north bank of the Spokane River. The park is 10 acres in size with 1400 feet of shoreline an the Spokane River. It is equipped with play equipment, shelters, water, electricity, and cooking units, drinking fountains, and rest rooms. The Parks and Recreation Plan identifies a shortage of park facilides in the East Valley area in which the site is located. (See Item R. below). C. Site Characteristics: The topography of the site can generally be described as mostly flat to gently sloping to the west, with very steep hillside along the east and southeast sides of the pmperty. The steepest slope on the site is approximately 6001o. The site is predominately grass vvith some trees in the steep slopes along the east and southeast edges of the site. D. NeighbQrhoad Characteristics: Tlie area to the north and west is open agriculturalland. Central Valley High School is approximat,ely .3 mile to the wesL I?irectly to the east and south rise a r+ock outcropping, steep treed hillsides and basalt cliffs which adjoin vacant land. Southwest of the site are single-family residences on lots ranging from approximately .8 acres to 1.6 acres in size. 3f95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 page 87 46 E. Zoning Analysis: Proposal: Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) and Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established on January 1, 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-60-42) North: Urban Residendal-3.5 (UR-3.5) established on January 1, 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-60-42) South: Mining (MZ) established on January 1, 1991, previously classified as Rock Quarry, Sand and Gravel Pit Zone (ZE-199-56) East; Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) established on January 1, 1991, previously classif'ied as Agricultuml (A) (ZE-60-42) West: Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) established on January 1, 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-60-42) Since January 1, 1991, when the Spokane County Zoning Code was fully implemented, the site has been zoned Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) and Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Prior to 1991 the site was zoned Agricultural (A). Adjacent property on the east and west is also zoned Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1), while the property to the north is zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). The property directly to the south is zoned Mining (MZ). This proposal includes a zone change request from Urban Residendal-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1), and is compatible with existing and adjacent zoning designations. The zone reclassification is requested to provide the entire proposal with one zone designarion, Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1), inste.ad of dividing three of the proposed lots into two ciifferent zones. The S uburban Residential-1 (SR-1) zone can implement the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with densities in the adjacent properties. F . Land Use Analysis: Proposal: Vacant and undeveloped. , North: Undeveloped, with one abandoned single-family residence. South: Vacant and undeveloped. East: Vacant and undeveloped. West: Agricultural land and single-fanuly residences on less than 2-acre lots. The are,a generally to the west consists of farmland and single-family residences on less than 2-acre lots with no sidewalks or curbing. The area generally to the north, east, and -south consists of agricultural and vacant undeveloped land. Recent subdivisions in the area include Remington Hill (PE-1763-94), Shelley Lake (PE- 1750-94), and Sullivan Meadows (PE-1747-94). Remington Hill is located.9 mile directly south of the site and consists of 7 single-family lots on 30 acres with an overall density of 4.3 acres per unit. T'he proposed Shelley Lake development is located adjacent to the west of the site and consists of 244 single-family lots on 123 acres with an overall density of 1.98 units per acre. The Sullivan Meadows 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 88 proposal is located .9 mile southwest of the site and consists of 17 single-family lots on 5.5 acres with an overall density of 3.09 units per acre. This proposal, with an overall density of 1.21 acres per unit, is generally compatible with land use trends in the surrounding area. G. Circulation: Access to lots within the subdivision will be provided by one public road, 12th Avenue, extending from Sha.mrock Road to the west property line and one public road, Steen Coult, extending from 12th Avenue and ending in a cul-de- sac near the north end of the subdivision. H. Design: The plat design illustrates residential lots ranging from 1 acre to 1.43 acres. All the proposed lots either meet or exceed the minimum lot size and frontage requirements of the Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) zone. I. Density: The net density is approximately one acre per unit, which meets or exceeds the density stand.ards of the Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) zone and the density range suggested by the Suburban Plus and Urban categories of the Comprehensive Plan. J. Drainage: A drainage plan is required. This plan must be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer's Department prior to development. K. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: None illustrated. Any required or recorded easements will be disclosed during the final plat process. L. Water Supply: The proposal is within the Vera Water and Power District. The water district has indicated that they are able to supply the proposal. A water plan and provisions for water service shall be coord.inated with the water purveyor prior to finalizarion of the plat. M. Sewage Disposal: The project will be served by on-site sewage disposal. Plans and specif'ications are to be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Utilities Department prior to finalization of the plat N. School: The proposal is in the Cenual Valley School District No. 356. The Central Valley School District has responded to the proposal and has indicated that existing facilities are inadequate to accommodate additional students. The school district has r+equested the applicant be required to negotiate a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impacts of the proposal on the school district and existing facilities. This request is included as a r+ecommended condition of approval. 0. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. The Fire District and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plaL P.. Wetlands/Critical Areas: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps do not indicate the presence of wetlands on the site. However, the proposed plat is associated with an area of special fload hazard, therefore development within this subd.ivision shall conform to the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and the Spokane County F1ood Zone Ordinance (Spokane County Code, Chapter 3.20). Flood zones are critical areas under 36.70 RCW and policies in Section 13A of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan (Critical Areas). Conditions submiued by County Engineering will implement these specific policies. (See Engineer and Roads Condition No. 4) 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 89 ~ • Q. Culturai Resources: None have been identified. R. Department of Parks, Recreation & Fair: The Spokane County Parks and Recreation Plan indicates that existing park facilities in the East Valley Suburban Area are inadequate to meet current and projected needs. The Parks Department has requested that the applicant be required to reach a voluntary agneement to mitigate the impact of the proposal on park facilities. To satisfy the requuements of RCW 58.17.110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recreation and playgrounds, the owner, at his option, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to mitigate the d.irect impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, open spaces and recreation facilities vvithin the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. This request is included as a recommended condition of approval. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and necorded in conj unction therewith. The agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 and be substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Department. Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligation within the voluntary agreement. III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ord.inances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department has determined that No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determination of Nonsignificance ("DNS"). The "DNS" was circulated to 13 other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/deparanents affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends March 21, 1995 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing. I V. PLANNING _ DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed preliminary plat conforms to the Spokane County Subdivision and Zoning Code regulations, and is consistent with and implements the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Suburban Plus and Urban categories of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with existing and pending land uses in the area and also provides "fill-in" development as encouraged by the Suburban Plus and Urban Comprehensive Plan categories. The zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Department recommends approval, as conditioned. 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 90 , . V. CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on t6e "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. i i. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be bind.ing on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. 2. Upon filing the final plat, or a pomon thereof, the zone reclassification of the final plat area shall be finalized, and the existing zone classification shall be changed to Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1), consistent with the proposed zoning approved with the preliminary plat of record. 3. The proposal shall comply with the Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone, as amended. . 4. The final plat shall be designed substandally in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal and approval. 5. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. 6. A final plat name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such nameJnumber to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. 7. Appropriate road name shall be indicated. 8. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to April 1, 1998. The applicant may request an extension of rime by subnutting a written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date. 9. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat Written approval of urility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 10. The final plat shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement. "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the tim building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plaL The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 91 11. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plaL 12. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessoes map scale. 13. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 14. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection d.istrict, County Build.ing & Safety Department, and County Health District, The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of the final plat, that the plan is in conforniance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 15. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual amangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accord.ance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorides prior to application for building permits within the final plat, The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building pemut due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 16. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building pernut for each lot" 17. No building pemut will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat" including a signed license sta.mp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferned to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system. 18. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters firom the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. 19. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. 20. Vera Power and Water requires provision of utility easements that are not co- existing with drainage easements. 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 92 21. Prior to approval of roa.d and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. 22. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School I?istrict and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalizadon and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potenrial purchasers who have made an agneement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall conform to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. 23. To satisfy the requirements of RCW 58.17.110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recreadon and playgrounds, the owner, at his option, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to mitigate the direct impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, open spaces and recreational facilities within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and recorded in conjunction therewith. The agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 and substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair DepartmenL Prior to finalizaaon of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligation within the voluntary agreement. 24. The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Tide Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special cond.itions imposed as a result of approval of land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the condirions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 93 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance nf A Building Pernmi.t Ch iJr. nf The Pro~r v As Pronosed: 1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 2. Plans, profiles, and cross-secdons as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3. Drainage plans and design calcularions showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. The regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program shall be observed since the proposed plat is associated with an area of special flood hazard. A development peimit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins on any property all or a portion of which is in any area of special flood hazard (reference Spokane County Ordinance No. 88-0521). The following statement shall appear within the dedicatory language of the plat: "Development within this subdivision shall conform to the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spokane County Code. Purchasers of the property in this subdivision are warned of possible flooding or ponding and the potential requirement to purchase flood insurance. This warning shall be carried in each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all progerty within the plat in the area of special flood hazard. 5. Construction within the proposed public smeets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer vvith "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Eng-ineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the arnount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construcdon of improvements, construction certification, "as-built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. No direct access from lots to 1/2 Rights-of-Way until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 9. No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 94 ` • ~ ~ 10. Road design, construction and drainage control for 1/2 Rights-of-Way and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the developer. 11. Individual driveway access pezmits are required prior to issuance of a building pemut for driveway approaches to the county road system. 12. Dedicarion of 50 feet of additional right-of-way along Steen Court is required. 13. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 14. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 15. The word "applicant" sha11 include the owner or owners of the property, his/her heirs, assigns and successors. 16. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Secrion Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Steen Court, which is to be constructed within the proposed development and extending to existing pavement on 12th Avenue. This will require the installation of 36 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing is aiso required. 17. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, cira,inage and fees in new construction. 18. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has deterrruned that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warrants the ded.ication of addirional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 19. T'he applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligadon for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with ihe applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 20. Applicant shall request dedication of the 1 foot strip prior to any final plat approval. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this pmject shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned in compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 95 0 ~ • Health I?istrict and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health DistricL 3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-wide collection systems. 4. A dry sewer connecrion to the future area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed. (See Condition #6) 5. If there are any public facilities on or through private property which must be maintained by Spokane County, then a Public Sanitary Sewer easement shall be shown on the face of the plat and the dedication shall state: "The perpetual [exclusive] easement granted to Spokane County, its successors and assigns is for the sole purpose of constructing, installing, operating, maintaining, repairmg, altering, replacing, removing, and all other uses or purposes which are or may be related to a sewer system. Spokane Counry, its successors and assigns at all times hereinafter, at their own cost and expense, may remove all crops, brush, grass or trees that may interfere with the constructing, installing, operating, maintaining, repairing, altering, replacing, removing, and all other uses or purposes which are/may be related to a sewer system. The grantor(s) reserves the right to use and enjoy that property which is the subject of this easement for purposes which will not interfere with the County's full enjoyment of the rights hereby granted; provided, the Grantor(s) shall not erect or construct any building or other structure or drill on the easement, or d'uninish or substanrially add to the ground cover over the easement. The easement described hereinafter is to and shall run with the land." 6. Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for. Dry sewer connections for review and approval by Utiliries Department prior to issuance of pennit to connect. 7. Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construction of public facilities/double plumbing/private connection/dryline connection. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of recard andlor any attached sheets as noted. 2. Appropriate urility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the subnuttal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coord.inated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane Counry. 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 96 . 0 40 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the sarisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domesric use, domestic urigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said wat,er plan must have been approved by the fire protection d.istrict and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conforniance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual anangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspecdon by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat, The contra.ctual arrangements will include a provision hold.ing Spokane Counry, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable sites for on-site sewage d.isposal systems are available on all lots. 11. Subject to specif'ic applicadon approval and issuance of petmits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to spacific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage d.isposal systems may be authorized." 13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." 14. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement: '"The public water system, pursuant to the water plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fireprotection district, County Building and Safety Department, and water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protecdon to each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot" 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 97 # - SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 1. The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requuements administered/enforced as authorized by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include: Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construcrion type, occupancy classification, exiting, exterior wall protection, and energy code regulations. (Note: The Department of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the time of building permit.) SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORTTY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, construction and excavarion projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction-related activities. 3. SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immed.iately to clean these surfaces. 5. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.). 6. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc...) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. SPOKANE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION & FAIR 1. See Planning Department Condition No. 23. CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. See Planning Department Condirion No. 22. VERA IRRIGATION DISTRICT 1. Project will require utility easements not ccexisting with drainage easements. 3/95 HEC Staff Report for PE-1773-95 Page 98 i ~ . v. (JFF I CE OF THE Gt7tJNTY EfVG I NEE R SPqk:ANE GQIJNTY, WASHTNGTON Mar ch 13, 1995 T0: SpoE;ane Coijnty Planninp Department (Current Planninq Administrator ) FRDM: Spok:ane County Enqineers Depari:men{: (3di" tL. SUBJ: SLtbdivision Conditions, Name She11eY_Acres Nt.tmber PE~i 773-95 re: Subdivisions "f'he fo11owinqr"Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced suladivision are submitted to tfie Spink:ane Gounty Hearinq F:•;aminer Committee for inclLtsion in the "Planninq Report" and "Findinc7s and Order" of the publ i c hearinq scheciuled Mar ch 1995. E 1 The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Enqi neer sub.je e t to dedi eat? on of r i qht-of -way and approva 1 ofi the road system aa indiGatecl in the preli.minary plat of record. F: That plans, profiles and cros5 ser.tioris as desiqned to County standards sfiowing proposed street center 1 ine ai-id curb grades he sLtbmitted to the County Engineer for approval ! prior to constructiori anci/c)r the filinq of a final plat; I road planr to be prepared unc:lPr the direction of a 1iGensed Professiona1 Ci v i 1 Enqi neer. F 3 That draxnaqe plans anrJ desiqn cal culationa sttowa.nq the aliqnment of drainage facilities be 5ubmii;ted ti-r the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the •fi 1 inq of the final nlat. Drainaqe plans to be prepared under the da.rection of a 1 i censed Profes5ional Civi 1 Enqineer» E4 That the requlations of the hlational Flood Insurance Proqram ~ b~ i-nbserved Cince the proposed plat is associal:ed with ~.~n I area of rpec:ial fliDod hazarcl. A clevelopment permit shall be iDbtained from the County Engineer before constructiiDn or ; developmEnt beqins on any property all or a portion of which is in any area of speeial f liDod hazarci (referencP Spok:ane COLinty Ordinance 88-0521)p That the folli-lwing statement shall appear withxn ihe dediGatory 1anquaqe of the plat. ~ paQe r~.. "Development within this siabdivision shall conf---)rm to the requirements of the N2tiona1 Fl.ood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spok:ane County Code. Pur chasers of property in thi.s subdivisi.on ar-e warned of p-Dssible f1oodinci or piDndinq and the potential requirement tO plArchase Flood In surarice, This warninq shal l be carried in each and every deed drawn tiD transfer owinership of any and a11 property within this plat in the Area of Special Flood Navard. " E 5 ConStruction within the pr-Dposed public streets and easements sha:l1 be performed under the direct supervision of a licensPd enqineer/surveyor, who sI-ia11 furnish the County Enqineer with "As BLtilt" plans and a cprtifxcate in writinq that a11 improvements were installed to the lines and qrades shown on the approved construction plans arid that all disturbed monumeiits have heen rep1aced. E6 h!o constructi-Dn wurk: is to be performed within the existxnq or proposed Pub 1 i c Fdi qht-of -Way unti 1 a permi t has been irsued by the Gounty Enqineer. Al l work: is sub ject to iiispection and approvzzl by the County Engineer» E 7 A+11 construction within the existinq or priDposeci Public Riqfit-of-Way is to be rompleted prior to fil.inq the final plat or bonr1 xn the amoLtn-t estimated by the County Enqineer to cover the cost of construction of i.mprovemei7ts, coristruction certification, "As Built" plans and monLtmentinq the street cPnterlines shall he filed with the County Engineer. E 8 hliD rJ i r e c t access from 1ots to 1/2 R i q ht-of-Ways unti 1 suc h riDads are constructed tO D.-DUnty Standards and establ i.sheri as County Road s. E 9 IVo direct access from 1ots to Stub Ftoad connecti.ons until sur_h rciads are con structed to County 5tandards and establ ished as Caunty Roads. . E 10 Roa d d esi gn, coi7 st ruc t ionan d d rai na qe cont ro1 for 1/2 R i ght- of -Ways and St uh Road conne c t i.ons are thp re5ponsi bi 1 i ty af the developer. I ~ E12 The applicant should be advised that individual driveway ! ac_r_es5 permit s are requireci prior tO isSLtance of a bi_tildinq j permit for driveway approaches to the COLtnty road system. ~ ~ - , (JcZQ2 3 E13 Dedicatioii of 50_feet of additiona1 RiUht°of-Way alony Steen Court. E16 Existinq County roads providinq direct access to the p1at shall be paved ~.~nd/or clArbed to Spokane Coi_tnty stand~.~rdse ~ \ E17 That a11 public roads wi-thin the plat be desiUned and constructed to Spokane Goi_tnty standards. E'1 9 "rhe worci "applicant" shal l i.ncli_ide the owner or owners of the propertyq his heirsq assiqns anci successors. E23 The C~--)Ltnty EriUi.neer r~as desiqriateci Typical Roadway Section hliamber Two,L_L~M►cal~Access standard for the improvement of Steen_Court which is towbe constructed within the proposed dcvelopment Gznd_extending_to_the_existing_pgvement_on_i2th _ Aven~_iP. Tr~is will req~_~ire tr~e installation of 36 ft« of asphalt. The construction of curbinq is a1so requirEd. E^: The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane COLtnty Board of Commissioriers Reso1Lltion tV o. 80-1592,as a mp nd ed, w I-ii c h estab1 i. r hes r e qu1at i. on s f---)r 1`' oad5 y app 1' oc.~ r f'i P..~a , d rainaq e a1"1 Cj f@e5 1 I"1 nE' W Cor15 tYuC t 1oI'1 d E33 The County Enqineer h~~ examined this dPVelopment pr~~~posal and haS determineci that the impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the deciicaticin ~--)f additiona1 Right of Way and the roadway imprc-vements herein specifiPd. E90 The applicant should be advised that there may Exist util.ities either Ltnderqroi_ind or overhead affecting the applicarits property, inclLtdinq proper•ty to be dedicated or set aside for fUtLtre arqLtisi.tion. Spokane Coi_inty will aSsLtme no finaricial obliqati.on for ad.justments or relocation reqardinq these util.ities. Yhe applicant should checE:: with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Enqineer to determine whether the applicant i--)r utilii:y is responsible ; fiDr ad,)u5tR12f1t oY t^EloGatlorl Cortr af'1d to fYlak2 ~.~rranclements for any necessary work:. ~ Special Conditioiis: I ~ 1 - - - ` paCq e 4 Applicant shall shall reqLtest dedication ofi tl-ie 1•ft. s{:rip prior t-D any final plat approval. ~ M . DETERMINATION OF NON'SIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SFOKANE ENVIROrfNIENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NUMBER(S): PE-1773-95fLE-7-95 SHELLEY ACRES DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Preliminary Plat to divide approximately 15.1 acres into 131ots for single farnily residences and Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 - (UR-3.5) to Suburban Re$idential-1 (SR-1) on approximately 1.74 acres. APPLIC'ANT: Mark McManus Ben Simpson 921 Squth Monroe Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 455-5411 LOCATION OF PROfOSAL Generally located east of 12th Avenue (extended) approximately 350 feet east of the intersection of 12th Avenue and Shamrock Street in the SE 1/4 of Section 24, Towns,hip 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNIENT DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environmenL An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is nDi required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available t6 the public on requesL This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., March 21, 1995, if they are intended to alter the DNS. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR By: Ken Kuhr~, Planner I Phone: (509) 456=2205 , Address: Spokane Counry Planning Department West 1026 Broadway °Spokane, WA 99260 DATE ISSUED:~ 1995 SIGNATURE: CONBENTS RBGARDING INVlRaN1VtNTAL OCNCFRNS ARE AT TiE G. APPEAL OF THIS D•TERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOK:ANE COUNTY PA G DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the siq!ung of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written an~ the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Departme,nt of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA State Department of Health 3. Spokane County Health District 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering . 5. Spokane County Ai'r Polludon Control Authority 6. Spokane County Pa'rks Department 7. Spokane County BQundary Review Board 8. Spokane Regional Transportation Council 9. WA State Departm6nt of Transportation 10. Spokane Transit Authority 11. Central Valley School I?istrict 12. Vera Water and Power 13. Fire District No. 1' , r ~ JAi~ 13, 199.5 ' SPOKANECOUNTY PLANN{NG DEPARTM£NT ~ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11,0109230 -1= ~ ` SPOKIINE ENYIROtMENTIII ORDINANCE (MAL 197-I1-960) Section 11.10.230(1) . Enviromaentai Checkllst 75 File No. Purpose of Checkllst: The State Environaientai volicy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW. requires all goverrnwntal agencles to consfder the environrnental impacts of a proposal Defore aaking Aecisions. An Environaentai IQpact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable siqnificant aEverse impacts on the puality of the enviromrcnt. The purpose of this checklist is to proviCe infortnation to he1D you and the agency identify fmpacts fron your proposal (anG to reduce or avoid irtqatts from the proposal. if it can be done) and to help the agency detide vhether an EIS is required. Instructions for Aqplicants: Th9s environsental checklist asks you to descrtbe sooe basic informatlon ebw t your proposal. Governmental agencies use thts checklist to determine whether the environaentai impacts of your proposal are slgnificant, requiring preDaration of an EIS. Answer the questfons briefly, with the most precise lnfomation knorn. or gtve the best description you can. You nust ansrer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. ln most cases, you should be able to ansrer the questions froe your own observations or projett plans witAout the need to hire ezperts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a Question dces not a0D1y to your proposal, wrlte 'do not know• or 'does not apply.' Camplete answers to the quQStlons nar may avotd unnecessary delays later. Sone questions ask aDout 9overnaental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline. and landmark deslgnations. Answer these questtons if you can. If you have problems, the govermrcntal agenctes can assist you. The checklist questlons apply ta all parts of your proposal. even 1f you elan to do thesn over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attech any additional information that wiil descrlbe your proposal or tts envtronnentai effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your ansMers or provide additlonal info nnation reasonably related to determining if there may be slgnificant adverse impact. Use of theck 11 st for nonprofett proposal s: Complete this checklist for rtonD*oject pro0osals, even though questions may be answereC 'das not aDply'. iN ADOITION, couplete the SUPPLEtIENTAL SHEET FOR NO!IPROJECT AC7IOM5(Part D). For nonproject actions. Lhe references in the checklist to the words 'project.' 'appllcant.' end 'property or slte' should be renC as 'proposal," *proposer.' and 'affected geographic area,' respectivety. A. BACKGROUND l. lawe of proposed project. 1f applicable: 5je6 c-v Ac-/S 2. 'lat of Applicant: 3. Address and phone numDer of applicant or tontact person: ___11~,J1 RG~Ql1IL.I, 4. Oate checklist prepared: / Z ^ ,317 5. Agency reQuestfng checkilst: /~L~I✓/~~~Gi 6. Proposed tiAing or schtdule (irtcludinq pheslng. Sf appltcable): P2OY~c~.~~i) l/7-o STA2T ~ /9 qS 7. a. Oo you have any plans for future addttions, enpenslon, or further activity related to or com ected rttn thts proposat? if yes, explain./~ n. • 0 b. Da you own or have optto on land nearb or adjacen to this proposat? If yes. explaln.~ /VdieT15'~ G'L14'~ ~j • ° _fn.,h`• f G~~ l C f' 41529114, ~ y116 / ~ 8. llst any environmental infarniation you know about that has been prepand, or wii) be prepared. directly related to this proposal. Rev.2/1/88 - 1 9PO1CA71L ERVIRONlENiAL ORDIPANCE (vAC 197-11-960) seccion 11.10.230(1) A. 8AL1CC804RD (coatinued) 9. Do you lmov vhether applicatiocu are pendla$ for governmental approval• of o[her propoeala Gireccly uffecting the praperty covereA by your proposal. If yea, ezplain. ^ f() , 10. Liat anq gonernaeec approvale or permics that vill be needed for your proposal, if Imovn. ,/C~f'JT- X :i'e'~si~e,C6,1 S't~frc T ayL,f~ AA,r'c0 VWe--c ~i°osWAu~ ~9 L.'..)-re 11. Give a brief, ccoplete description of ywr proposal, including the proposed uses and the •ise of the proJect and site. "here are several queotions lecer in chia checkllet chac ask yov to describe certain aspecte of q wr proposal. Y w do not need to rep nc thoae anevers on this pege. ',~V /9PveOX /lG2Fc- ( s-•~uocatioo of the propoea2. Give sutficient lnforsacioe for a person [o unEerstand the precise location ot your propoeed pro)ecc, includlnE a treec sddreee, if anq, end •ection, te+nu h1p aod range, if knovn. If s propo" l vould occur over a range of erea, provtde the range or Doundarlee of the sice(e). Provide a legal descriptlon, •ite plan, vicieity nsp, and topographic mep, if reasora bly evatlaDie. vhile you ehouid sut,sic any plins required by the agency, yw •Te noc reQuired to duplteate aap• or de[alled plans eu m it[ed vith any perait appllcacton re Lted co this checklisc. 1~.C7~T Z AJ 7-11 OF I L. IfJ, ~ Wf', 09:'-X /,~/1~ilJ aJ& /{l rL ~s~ • ~ o ,G ~~~f,I~ .1~~F'~C`•~-~/.L o Ai 2 <<ellp y/ / y i~ 13. Does the proposed action lie vichio the Aquifer Sesultive Area (ASA)' ':he General Saver Service Ares? 'he Prlor![y Sever Service Area' 'he Ctty ot Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Over L y Zone A[ L e for boundaries). 1 QJor-st c 70 Be COKPI.E'.ZD BY APPLICANT B. OiVIF0144ER'..AI. CS.EKE22?$ Evaluatlon For Agency Uoe Only a. Geaeral descriptlon of the site (eircle one): flat,(rollin` g~ hlllq,( eceep elope~J oountaluous, otr: ` cu o E. 'fiec is the •teepest slope on the •ite (approximate pereent slope)'.--607v r / ~ ~ -.•,'^,~,J c. 'Jhat geeeral types of soile are found on the site (for e:aaple, clsy, uod, gravel, peat, muek)? If you knov the claeeiflcacion of agricultural •oils, speclfy chen and note any priae fars Lnd. ~.e~- ON ' T ,L i.,OlJ/Iq2 /i/Alt' / ~'1 ntlv ~r E~'~% C i'~ 7 t/ d. Are chere surfaee indicatione or hlstory of unscable soile in the Lamediate viciaity? If so, C describe. A,I U . ~C~c:•~~'~$~;Z~ ~&-V ✓L--i/i~ &rnf,, . ~ / 2 ' SPOKANE ENYIROtIMENTAI ORDINANCE • (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS(continued) Eraluation For ~ Describe the purpose, type, and approximate puantities of any fSlling or grading proposed. Agency Use Only Indicate source of fill. a ~ Q r .-4 1~'~-Sd1~`l~.O~ r ~ /9L't O/~O_i:/1~/~ ~ / • f. tould erosion o aur as a result ot clearing, construction. or use? If so, generally descriDe. No g. ADout what percent of the site will De covered wtth impervtous surfaces after project construc- tion (for exampl@. asphalt or buildings)? 4yr/__ h. Proposed measures to reduce or tontrol erosSon. or other lmqacts to the earth, 1f any: "ow<~ i Z_z Z. a. What type of enfssions to the air would result frpn the proposal (i.e., duit. eutasroblle. odors industrial, rooE smoke) durSng constructton anE when the project ts coaqleted? lf any, 22'v>j~~Z~•~ generally describe and give approximate Quantltes if known. r~✓ il; CoA) ~re 6t"' / b. Are there any off-stte sourtes of emisslons or odor tf+at may affect your proposal? [f so. generally descriDe. ~J C. Proposed measures to reduce or control eailsslons or other impacts to air. tf any: % ~4Zc/~~ .S"l~~li1N6 Gov~t lT,~ 61 Z_ !1 UTL&-Y 1) v/ll ,-eOL- 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) ls there any surface water body on or in the imeeElate vtcinity of tAe site includinq year- round and seasonal streams. saltwater, takes, ponds. wetlandsl? If yes, descrlbe type and provlEe names. If appropriate. state what stream or river 1t flows fnto. ~4109 ~ 4ddt- (2) 11i11 the project raquire any work over. 1n, or adfacent to ithln 200 feet) the described waters? [f yes, please descrlbe and attach avallable plans. ~o /P~~1~GTt3 ~CG~l=NI~ ~f~~.t/ 1O 0 f ~ 3 ~ , • ~ SPOLANL CR9Ifl01Q0DrfAL OBDIHANCE (uAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) E. CNVIRONFMN?AL ELTKEN':S (contlnued) Evaluatlon Foc Agency Use Onlq (7) Esclmate the anounc of fill end dredge n~teriel ttut ~roald be placed in or removed from the surface vater or vetlands end ladicate the area of the •ice tlut vould be affected. Indicate the eource of fill oaterlal. ~J0A9f _ (4) Will the proposal require eurfu e wa[ac vlthd nvsls or divessloos? Cive a general desetip- [lon, purpoee, and •pproxiaate Qutntl[les, if knwn. A/ o (5) Does the proposal Lie vitAin • 100-yqr flood p Liat If so, note lou tion on the •ite plan. 7' Q~~LAT (5) Does the pTOQSfYl lnvolve any diseharges of v"te oaterial• to suriace vatets? If •o, descrlbe the type ot vaste and antlcipated voluae of dlsclu rge. . IV Q D. Cround: (1) Y111 groundvater Ee vithdravn, or vill vaceT be disctureed to groundvater.' Cive general deacriptlon, purpoae. •nd approsinate Quantlties. !f Imovn. 6"l C 70- bleloVA ~,i • 1~ ..~Az A Detcribe vaste saterial thac vill ba dlscharsed lato the `round trom •eptlc [anks or other saoitary vute creaoeot lacilicy. DescrlDe the general •i:e of the s7stea, the numDer of houses to be served (i[ •9Dllcabls) or the aisber ot persons the systeo(s) are erpected co eerve. S~/s~~~-~-~► ~~~~ar~~ (7) Deseribe any systeas. ocher thaa those designsd tor the dispowl of saalcary vu te. installed for the purpose of dischargiag fluids balav the ground suriace (loclude• syscm• such •s chose for the diapoul of scoes vater or draiaae fram floot dralos). Daserlba the cype of systen, the asount of aaterial to ba disposed of chrougA clr system and the type• of ~cerial• . likely to be disposed of (lncludiag as[erial• vfileA aay enter the @yeto inadw rtentl7 through opills or a• a result of firefighting sccivities). A;0= '14i (4) Will any chmieals (especiallq orsanic •olvents or pstroleus fuels) be •tored in above- grouad or uadergreuad storage tanlu? If no, vhat types and Quantitie• of mtecials vill be stored? 4 ~ SPOICAliE ENVIHORlQ1iM OBDINANL'E (VAC 197-11-960) Seetion 11.10.230(1) B. ERVIRONlMAL PLBCtt';S (continued ) Evaluation For Agency Use Only (S) Wha[ protective eeaeuTee v111 be cakeo to ineure that leake or e9111• of any chenicela acored oc used on eice vill not be alloveQ to pereolate to groundvater (chie includee euaeurea to keep chemicals ouc of disposal eyeteo• described in 3b(2) and 3b(1)? N1% c. uater Runoff (Lncluding •coro vater): (1) DeseTibe the source of runoff (including stocm vater) and oetbd of colleetion and disposal if any (include Quantities, if knovn). Wlsere vill chis y tet flovi Vill [hls water flow Snto oCher vatere? If so, deecribe. (2) :1111 aay chealcala be •tored, hanEled ot wed on the site le a lou tion vhere s*pill or leal: vill drain to surfaee or groundvater or to astotv water Qispowl @ye[m disclurging to eurface or grounAvater! ~v V (3) Could vaete oaterials enter grwnd or •urface waters? If•so, generally describe. N~ d. Proposed measures to reduee or control surface. ground. and rvno[f water lnpoctt. tt •ny (it t the proposed action 11es vltAin the Aquifet Sensitive Araa oa especially clear on explaoa[loos r relating to facllitie• coneecniaa Sectlons 3b(6). 3b(5), and 3c(2) of thl• cAeeklist): 7o TH,~ d61U,,I,~/..~CZ.c.f- /•l~~~ fS~ .~~"r{~: ~c1 ~j - _zj~ G . P(.A.vl'S s. f:heek or circle type of vegecstion found oe the site: deciduout tree: alder, maple, aspen. other. ~ evecgceen tree: fir, cedar, pine, otAer. X ohtuDa. ~ grems. X pascute. cTOp or 8r,in. vet wil pLau, csttail. buttareup, bullrush. •kualc caDDa6e, other. water plsnts: M ter 1111y, eelgcaoa. allfoil, other. ocher t7Pes of vegetation. fb. Vhat kind and aiount of vegetatlon vill De rsoved or alteced? J~~~" c. List threatened or eadaogeced specie• kaove co be on or near the siteZW7;'; ~.~Or, N i d. Proposed landscaping, we of eative plants. or other seuure• to presern or enhance vegetatioo on the •ite. 1f anq: , • SPOKAltE ENVIRONKENTAL ORDINA1lCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluatton For Agency Use Only 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have bFen observed on or near the slte or are known to be on or near the site: birds: haw heron. eagle. ongbirds) other: mammais' deer bear. elk. Deaver. other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herrinq, shellfish, other: other: b. list any threatened or endangered species knarn to be on or near the site. 1Uo~~~'-~~'it~ o v~ a~ ~PfJy~I,n1 ~-~✓~rJi ~i/~-,~~L/~s t c. Is the site part of a raigration route, . If so. explaln. Na a . d. ProDOSeG neasures to pr serve or enf~ance wi 1411fe. 1f any: L L~~1 ~~Gd G.Lf"1G- ~~.zs~~ ~i~~lo,~;> 5. ENERGT AND HATURAL RESOURCES a. 4hat kinds of energy (elettric, natural gas. wood stove. solar) rill be uSeC io meet tAe the corapleted project's energy neeCs? Descrtbe whether it w111 be used for heating, nbnufac- turing, ett. "'50,e • ~~.~i~~ XA1~ 4. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy Dy a Qjacent properttes? If so, generally Eescribe. C. uhat kinds of energy conservatlon features are included in the plans of thls proposal? List other proposed rneazures to reduce or control energy Inqacts. 1f any: 00~0 j257C-/ • ~~~L ~ T 4 1~~r~l~ Cd!/lN4 ZQ1r' ~ 7. ENYIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any envlronnental health hazards. includinq exposure to toxic cAe+oicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste. that could o aur as e result af this proposal? If so. describe. (1) Describe speclai energency servites that mlght be requfred. /1/Drq,_ 6 ~ 9PO1CALiL T.R7IS02OMl7M OILDIPAttCE (uAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. E*JVIRONlMIf'LAL EI.EKE27TS (eontinued) Cvaluatlon For Agency Use Only EtNIROtilE:RAL HEAL7R (continued) ~ ~ (2) Proposed meesures to reduce or control enviroanencal healch hasards, lf any: b. Noiee: (1) Yhat types of aoise e:ist ln the area vhleh "y affnet ywr project (for e=anple: trafflc, equlpeeet, operation, ottu r? /&Li"- (2) Vhst type• and levels of noise vould be c[eatsd by or a uoelated vith t!u projeet on • short-cerm oc s long-terv basi• (for e:aaple: tratfic, cocutruetioe, opetatlon, other)? Indicate vhat hour• noise vould cose Eros che •ite. ~a,, ~ (lAL/l~('n (~lJ~(1 '/rLfl~) S ~D Y G ~~yU Lr- ~ I ~J6 ' (3) Proposed measure to reduee or control noise lepaets, if •ey: ' ~ _•i L~' G~O/CI~.Z~~ /C~ ti ~ ~1~~L~.// Oc~°~~ 8. U1'1D AND SHORELINe USE a. Vhac i• che current we of che •ite and •djacenc propertieo? D. Ilas the •ite been used for agrlculture'. If •o. describe. (J41 /4,0:;- (r,eQ/,f Z4/~G c. Deacribe any structures on che •ite. d. Vill any ecructure• be deaolished? If no, vhich' e. Vhac 1• the curreac :oning clusitiutioo of ihe sitet (;Q'C'l 3 f. Whac i• the currenc compreheasive pLn desigaatlon of ttu •ite? g. If applicable, vhat 1s the cunenc slwreline aaeter progro designation of the •lte? h. Nas aay psrt of the •ite been classified aa an 'enviromeetally wmitive' areai Ii so, specify. i. Approziaately hw many people vould raside or vork in the easpleted pcoject! ~ 7 . , SPOfGNL LRVIIIDWWRfAI. OxDl[iAPCE (uAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.270(1) B. LNVIROttlE1ZAL B.EKEFT'S (eonciaved) °valuation For Agencq Use Only Approxioately hov maey people vould the c.oopleted projecc dlsplue' 0X./~ k. Proposed meaeures co svold or reduce dispLeeaent lapacts, if any: 1. Proposed aeasures to ensure the proposal is coapatibk vith ezistin6 aed pro3eeted Land use• aad plans, if anq: 9. HOUSING Approaimatelq hov eany unic• vould be provided. if anyt Iodicate vd ther high-. aiddle-, or lorincooe housing. b. Appro:lnately Aov aanr units, if any. vould be elimloacsdt Iediute vhtthar high-, aiddle-, ot lowincoae housing. . J D~ c. Propoeed ueasures to reduce or tonttol housing impacts. lf anq: 10. AES21tETICS a. Vhac is che callesc height of aay proposed •truccure(e). noc including antennas? Yfuc ts che priecipal ezterior building mte[lal(s) proposed'. 60 D. Nf►at vlevs in c!u imediate vicinity vould be altered or obs[ruccedt 65444;&45~b 4Co.'P- %~-o D oO,E- . c. Proposed seasures to redute or coatrol mochatie lapae[s. Sf aoy: 75~/~~9G /~/.~c~.~~0~/fa.~/1.?"~ - J! lemT ° . AC- 10&_s~:a~f/._s~~ J& /00A/c v,7; > T l/• 11. LICH:' AND CI.ARE A. •lhat type of light or 6Lre v111 the propowl producet tThac tise of day vould it maialy oecur' N o A veo: . b. Could liaht or gLre frvs clse fiaished projecc be a "tecy hasard or latertere vitb •leNt ~d e. IJha[ ezistin6 off-site •ourees of lighc or `Lre aay atfeet your proposal! ~ d. Proposed snsures to reduce or eontrol lighc aod aLr• isputs. if any: 8 ~ - SPO[ARB IIfVIRONfEt1'fAL ORDItUNCE „ (iiAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) E. EPVIROlaCeF[AL e1.EMERl5 (eontlnued) Evaluation Foc Agency Uee Only 12..RE A2ION ~ s. Vt►ac designaced and inforval recreational,oqportunitles are in the immediete vicinicy? / e l~~„,:► 6~C ~.1~~- ~ 4l ' ~e/'lL , . ~ ✓ i~~c~/ ` b. Would the proposed project disp Lee any ezisting recreatioaal wes' If eo, describe. /UO,r/ 4i5- c. Proposed measure• to reduce or control lapiets oo reereatioo. ineluding recrw ciowl opportuai- tie• to De provided by the project or appliunt. if aaq: IUoA4~5 iHe 13. HIS'.'ORIC AND CULTURAL YRESERVATION a. Are tlu re any plaees or objects Llsted on or yroposed for naciocyl. •cace or local preserve- tion regieters knorn co be on or aezt to the •ite4 If so, geaerally describe. IUoNtF 25 b. Generallq descrlbe any landaarks or evidence of hlstoric archseological, scientific or cultural imporcance lmovn to be o0 or nest to the site. /.60t-;- AUo:vAl 1,7'17'"l.../~S c. Proposed aaasures to reduce or control lopaus. ii •nr: _nW_51~dCTZi10/ ;E~Ori'i1Nf 14. : FAt1SPOR"ATION a. Identify public •treec• aed highvay• serving the site and describe proposed acee u co the esiscing screet syscm. Shoron oite pLns, lt any. . b. Is eite cuzrently •ervsd by puDlic translc' 2f noc, vhat 1• the approsisace distance to the o n rest tcansit atopt Vo c. flov oan7 parkiag spacas vould the coapleced projecc havei 8ov many vouid the project elid oate' 13 ~ Yill the propo ul require aoy nev road• or •traece, or is➢ron=ets co e:istiog road• oc acreats aot includlag drlvevayst If so, generally deacribe (lodlute vtti ther public or prlvate). e. Will the pro}net use (or oecur in the laediata vicinity of) mater, rail. or air tramportacion? If eo, generally deseriAe. Na 9 SPOIUNC PINIYO10(KRfAL OBDIMNCL (WAC 197-11-960) Sactlon 11.10.230(1) D. FFVIROKKE1*IAL ELHMENIS (contlnved) Evaluatlon For Agency lJse Ooly f. Rov oany vehicular trip• pet day vould be generated by the canpleted project' If Imom, indica[e vhen peak vould oecur. 7/~/~~,/ll/J4, o,,,;;~ SUR~Z,//1S:Z0/(f ~i~i!/E~~~ /OD N~ g. Pro cxansoorcatlnn lepeecs. if an ~G ei ~z1~~"/ ~1 or.~~ A~.~o ~v~ ,~i~~• , //'15. P1T8LIC SERVICES a. 'aould the project rasulc in an lnereased naad for publie •enlca• (for e:uyle, tire pro[aetion, police proteetioo, health eate, sehooli, other)t If •o, genera117 deseribe. Proposed neasures to reduee or coetrol dlracc Lput• oc+ public •ervlces. 1f aay: 16. p-IL17IES ~ a. Citcle uti2.ic~trentlr •valLDle at the •ice: eleetrlclt~~icural gu vate[, ~efwe (service, celephone. •anitarr sever. •eptic •ystem. other. b. Descrlbe the ucllltie• tlut are proponed fot the projset. the u[iliCy providins the ser►ite and the general construction aetivities on the site or !o the laaadiata vleieitr vhieh dght be needed. C. SIC?IATtJRP ' I, the undersigoed, sveir under the peaalty ot parjutr chat the above respowee are made truthtully and to the basc of oy kaovledge. I also understand ctut, should there be anr vlllful oisrepresentatlon or villtul laek of full dloelosuse oo sp part, the a en sar vithdrav any deternisucion of noeuignifiuoes that it a16At issue !e reliaoee upoo thl• clseicllK. Da te : Proponent Xwe- < ~ (Plsue Prihc or Typa) Proponent: /Wdress: ~ s SLg'na e Phone : Person eoaplecictg fosa: x~_LL~~ ~ Qate: Pfione : POR STAlP USY ONLY Scaff omDer(s) revieving ckecicliac: ~ = v Baied on hie eceff reviev of the eo ro ntal checklist and other pertine~t intormtLon, the staff: ~ A. Conclude• that there arn no probable •ignifiuat adverse lapacti and rec~nd• a deteraination of aoosignificacen. B. Conelude• that probabla signlficaot advetse environaental iapaets do ezist for the curraot proposal and neoa~nd• a oitigated deter- mioation of uoaaignificance v![h conditiocu. C. Conclude• that there are psoDnble signifiunc adaerse environmantal Saputs and recanseods a detetsloation of signitiunee. lZLI11G M - =75.00 10 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND 70NE RECLASSIFICATYON APPLICATION PART I A. GENERAL INFORMATYON: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: ~ ~~C~v(~f-UW C MAII,ING ADDRESS: GI ;L1 CITY: • TA'T'E: ZIP: ' PHONE: (work) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT ()WNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLXCANT TO SER~4AS~R. E ESENTAT VE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: C ~C l'Y1.0 ~L~' PRO7ECTiPROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq, ft) ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR COIVTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) Ap ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL O F ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED ~ oP (4~^a9 q "R~ ~ ~ ~S ol.4 I • ~j t4. u s-~~~ - 9) L (,p STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL ~A~SI O- La t'~ EXISTIIVG ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTA.BLISHED) ~`'!L LG~'-3• f J~ EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY , PROPOSED ZONING s /Q ~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DIS'I'RICT I WATER PURVEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings ~ Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) 'I Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANIVING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: CL, CiE 7.50 9~W /~A C b B. LEGA.L/7.,nNE RECLA;SSxFIC.ATIn Z F RMATIQT~L- - LOCATION OF PROPOS AL: SECTION cZ~ TOWNSHIP RANGE NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED A.RTERIAL YES 0 NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS RECE4VE rEB 9 199; SPOKANE COUNTY ' PLA1V1J1NG 017-PAR'Ct:4zr!7 ~ ~ I SUBDIVISION AND ZUNE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 LEGA.L DESCR.IPTION OF PROPERTY (Auach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE . LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELINDNARY SUBDIVISION MAP AND REQUESTED ZONIlVG FOR EACH LOT AND BLOCK FOR MULTIPLE ZONE REQUESTS. t IF YOU DO NOT H4LD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN TI'? ~ ~QV6~ j WHAT A.RE THE CHANGED CONDITTONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL NiAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? /71A" &.C, 4.o7',-5 7P4: SsN G,i-.6 /j'10S T , WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON1'HE A.DJACENT PROPERTIES? 1)9 c2a AsE "I ,/76n1A-fT~ 1 ' WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION? _ _ ep NT DO~,G7".Zf~ - - WHAT MEASURES D(J YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMF'ACT 'ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? C64?~4228t_dr ,WZ~Tiy PI'U AJ4FX6&&O&jQ!1~G~ GO T ~ ~ . , C. PRELIMINARY SIIBDIVISION CENERAL INFORMATION: NUMBER OF LOTS : GROS S AREA: L. TYPICAL LOT SIZE: PROPOSED NET DENSITY*: 4 I QZ~aG SMALLEST LOT SIZE: 1• 0/ 1&e4!5- MINIMUM FRONTAGE: PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: Individual wells Public system ~ Private Community Syscem Other ( ) - Describe: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public sewer Community system Septic tank and drainfield ~ Double Plumbing Dry Sewer Other Describe: UTII.ITY COMPANIES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL: Elecoricity: Sewer. Gas: U 1 l.u A Water. ~~`1~4~- Phone: Us (Ai DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUT'URE A.DDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FIVRTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL? , Yes No ( TF YES, EXPLAIN: D. PRELIMINA,RY SUBDIVIfiIQbLIViPRQY EViE~VT- I F R TLQJ~L- I LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads Public roads 64 Arterial roads O Tract X mads DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE: • . i ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COLETE DEVELOPMENT OF TH~E SUBDNISION: . IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes No ~ IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schoolst etc.)? Yes No ~ IF YES, DESCRIBE: RECEIVED ~ ~j * NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/4~2WBLIC M&) AREA. sPOxaNe couNrY ' PLANNIMG DEPARTMENT ~ ' ~ .t SPOKA►.NE COUNTY PLANNING PRELIMINA,RY SUBDIVISIQN APPLICATIQN . PART I REcEIVED JAN I s 1995 A. GENE.RAL _YNFORMA11ONi ,c,rOfiANE COUNT`l n^r.IT wrJ`) Ay^ S3=P~-. NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATI'VE: ,z9W,d1%1~~/Id'11 1 S MAILING ADDRESS: -5 AO/lJ~o er, CITY: STATE: ffj/49 ZIP: t~ , PHONE: (worl:) 0y41, (homc) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, YNCLUDE WRIT'TEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. /ylilkrr /yI F/~/w4tS LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: L.6,n.I 50i0,o~o~✓ PHONE: MAILING ADDRESS: , CITY: S~Difr~I/ll 'a.~ STATE: ~A ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. fl) ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) _Z tl? ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL ZMZ-j---0AJ OL" ySp? ASSESSOR PARCEI. #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED O?c , ' ~ ,~v . '1'"'~~+^~'J~i STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL Of- 12 kk, EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) S ~ EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY OIJ~Al COMPREHENSIVE PLA~I CATEGORY 5CH04L DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT l WATER PURVEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings>< Dup,lexcs Multifamily dwellings Manufactumd homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Ocher ( ) - I?e.scribe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANIVING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVTNG THIS PROPERTY: L.~ 9- ~3 . B . LEC AL INE(3RM AYTn~L- I'Z 7, A- LOCATION OF PROFOS AL: ~A57'7_ SECTION a? T TOWNSHIP RANGE NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: ~ WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: 60 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERTAL YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDTVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION • MAP. SliBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? . D ~)v1S .~~yj ~tl J' NI~ITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FE~iAKE THIS WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CO PROPOSAL WARRANTED? WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? . WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROFOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROFOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? C. PREL_IMIN_ARY SI1BDIVISION CLENERAL INFORMATION: NUMBER OF LOTS : /3 GROS S AREA: --2-5 /.&'e~ < . TYPICAL L4T SIZE: l 4G2 4e- PROPOSED NET DENSITY*: t~~/~~'.~ SMALLEST LOT SIZE: l~e-. e 4 MINIMUM FRONTAGE: PRQPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: Individual wells Public system P11 Private Community System Othcr ( ) - Dcscribc: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public sewer Community system Septic tank and drainfield Double Plumbing Dry Sewer Other Describe: UTILITY COMPANIES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVYDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL: Electricity: v664 Sewer: PIVX4~ Gas: Wa) yo Water. Phone: DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTKER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL? Yes No ~ IF YES, EXPLAIN: D. FR . XMINARY SUBDIVI~SYnN iMPRQVEMENT INFORMA'[ION: LEVfiL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads Public roads Arterial roads . Tract X roads DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE: , ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: IS PHA5ING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes No x IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Yes O NoA IF YES, DESCRIBE: * NET DENSITY IS UiVITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA. SliBDNISION APPL'ICATION . Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE. THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRTTTEN VERTFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON SHALL BE INCORPORATED . IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~ B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (H*A0Cj (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE VVATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FTRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. ,r6!~ C. RECOMMENDED F1RE FLOVV: ~ ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DE'1F-RMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLTCATION TTME. G - , i FJ D. REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: fine, G''+ ~f~'' ~~~/~.f~Ni ~~C'► A/ A lt'~~ .~~rPdlef FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE ITLE DATE , WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR T):QMF-STIC WATER ANll FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) (VAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. , B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: c fe, , ~"'lt 1 /7 f-t~,-c~~.. . ~r(// 1 .~,J~. ' •,I-~, ;.yt a ! 11 L~~ ! ( 5. WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE r DATE _ COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELII'v1INARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQtTIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. C OMMENTS : S IGNATURETLE DATE COUNTY UIILITIES A PRELIMIINARY DISCUSSIQN HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR E NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (H)a WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A. COMMENTS: (~CPR.~ A-T_..F OiT~o WATF-0 `t'i-%A-VEYok ~ ~ Z SIGNATURE A , HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AN17 G.E3yVERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) ;0AV.E BEEN SATISFIED. . A. COMMENTS: ~t,~~„~ f C%/i 5.,~r= S~l~~l~c :c' .5~~-/~ T~ ~ti•-S r j r ~ ✓ 3" y , ~__-MGNATURE/I'ITLE DA SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMrIVARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTIZEIVIENTS FOR THE PROVTSION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: Uk L\0A1V-F L 00 SITE r E Ci SIGNATUREfI'ITL A SUBDIVISIrJN APPLICATTON Page 4 of 4 PART III SURVEYOR VERIFICATION ' I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICEI~ AVE COMPLETED TI-E INFORMATION REQUESTED. THE LEGAL DE ~J~~~3 • M Y PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR . UNDER MY SUPERVISION IN C A~~~ QUTREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING/SUBDIVISION REGUL : T : = N Nsr OF TEE S TATE OF WAS HINGTON. , , . . SIGNED: D ATE: ^•c • r 7j ~q -i , ADDRESS: - l ~ PHOIVE: z ~c~ - r ~ ' : . . ~ > zrP: ~ c, r ~ ~:~~=`;Gt: 1!'ii•1 ~ 1'Z .":?f12',;57;,7'1~';,:.;~'r.~t!'•...~.•a, u• , .,.'r PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFiRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEBGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AF"FTRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE O'WNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ' ! 1 - / ~L~' . /~~~z•~_ SIGNED: ~ - - - DATE: I -3 , . ADDRESS: hrZ 2- !l4Gce yGv,4 y PHONE: .~OA'wGv e' : ZIP: SIGNATURE OF APPLICANTP< REPRESENTATIVE DATE ~9irlD STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIl2MED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF . . 1994', BY - , , ; IVQ . ` . \551 O N ~,A ` , i' • ; . ~ Y S E i v N N C Notary"Public in or,, c S lc of Washingt~) 2 Rcsiding at: ~ • ~x c~ . . o,. My appointmcnt txpires: WA PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) DATE SUBIvIIT!`ED: ( FILE L273 9S (ze - 7- 9 5) ~ DATE ACCEP'I'ED: BY: V. 41TOTAL FEES : ~l ~ . ~ RECEIPT ~OD ~ Y • r , ~ i S P O K A N E C O U N T Y ~ OFFICE oF THE CouNrY EtvGUVEEtt • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN W. KEN KUH , ANNING FROM: BREND~AND KATHERINE R, STORMWATER DATE: FEBRUARY 1 1995 SUBJECT: n, 11 During the SEPA review process the applicant wiil need to address the following issues: The applicant shall address mitigation of any possible impacts to public drainage facilities from the project. An erosion control plan may be required to safeguard drainage facilities during construction activities. How are the drainage facilities to serve the private roads going to be maintained? Ditches or other areas receiving stormwater shall be grass-lined to filter pollutants before water seeps into the ground. A maintenance plan and maintenance schedule will need to be prepared to guide the responsible individual or group in the maintenance of the private drainage facilities. Identify the parties responsible and make sure that every facility is identified as to who is responsible for it and what the maintenance will include. The applicant shall address means of disposing of the drainage associated with the private roads and/or lots without impacting public road facilities or other properties. The design of the approach (driveway) shall be completed in such a way the does not direct street drainage into the proposed house or garage. D/SHELLEY ACRES 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 r OFF I CE QF TME CCIUNTY ENG I NEER SPQKANE C(]UIVTY, WASH I NGTOIV February 1, 1995 T0: Sp-Dkane Cour-ity Plani-iii-iq DQpartmerit (Current Planninq Administrator) _ a - FROM: SPoE:ane CountY _ Enqineers DePartmentQd+ SUBJ: Subdivision Conditioris, Name 5heX ley_AcreS NLtmber Unassigned re: S+abdivisions 1"he fiollowinq~"Conditxons of Approval" for tf-ie above referenc:ed sLtbdi v isi-Dn are submi t ted to t he Spcik:ane Coianty N 1 anni ng Department for inclusion in the llesiqn Review Meetinq scheduled February 1, 1995, E 1 The coriditional approval of the plat is ctiven by the County Engineer Suha.ject to dedieation of riql-it-of-way and approval of the road system as iridicated in the prPliminary pl~t of record. E2 "rnat plans, profiles and cross sections as desi.qned to Couni:y standards showinq proposed street centerl.ine and curb qrades be submitted to the County Enqineer for approval prior tiD constructi-Dn and/or the fil.inq of a fiiial plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a 1 i censed Professional Civil. Eiiqineer. E3 That drainaqe plans and desiqn cal cu1a•tions showinq the aliqnment of drainaqe farilities he submitted t-D the County Engineer f~.wr approvaX prior to constrLtcti.cin and/or the fi 1 inq of the firial plat. Drainaqe plans to be prepareci under the clirection of a licensed Professionci1 Civil Enc7ineer. E 4 "fr~at the regulations of the Nationa1 F7.ood tnsurance Proqram be c)bserved since the propcised plat is associated with an are2 of special flood ha: ard. A development permit sha1l be obtaiiied from the Coijnty Enqineer before constri.iction or deve].opmEnt beqins on any property a11 or a portion of which is in any arP~.~ of special flood I-iazard (referei-ice Spok:ane Coun t y 0 rd i na n c E 88--0521 That the fiol liDwinq -statement Shal 1appear within the ciedi.catory lanquaqe of the plat: , - ' PagE' r~ a~. "Development witliin thi~ subdivision shall conf-Drm to the requi.rements of the hlational Flood Insurance Proqram and Ghapter 3.20 of the Spok:ane County Code. Purcha5ers of property in thi~ SLibdivision ~.~re warned ofi possible floodinq or p-Dndinq anci the potential requirpment to purchase Flood Insuranceo This warni.nq shall be carried .i.n each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and a11 property withi.n this plat in the Area of 5pecial Flood Hazarda " E 5 Constructir-)n within the propi-nsed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed enqineer/surveyor, who shai l furnish the Coi_inty Engirieer with "As Bui:lt" plans and a certifYCate in writi.nq that all improvements were ii-istalled to the lines and qrades shown on the approved constrLtction plans and that 211 disturbed monuments have been replaced. E6 No eonstruction worb:: is to be performed withiin the existinq or pr-Dposed PLtb1 a. c Ri gh t-of -Way unt i 1 apermi t ha<.s been issued by the County Eriqineer. All work: is sub.ject to inspection and approval by the County Enqineer. E 7 A11 construction wi.tfiin the existinq or pr~~po5ed F'kAblic Right--of-Way is to be completed pric-ir to filinq the -fxnal p 1 at or a bond i n t he amount esti.mated by t he County Enqzneer toD C!?V21'' the CoSt of Cor15tYi.ACtlol'l of impreDvements, construction certification, "As Built" p.lans and monumentinq the 5treet center ines shal be fi led with the County EnQi neer . E8 IVo clirect access from 1ot~ to 1/2 Riqht-of-Ways unti1 such roads are consi:ructed to Courity Standards and established as COLtnty Roads. E9 IVo direct access from 1ots to Stub Road cortinections i_tntil such roads are constructed i:o County Standards and establ ished as County Roads. E10 Road design, constructiiDn and drainaqe contr~iDl for 1/2 Riqht- of °Ways and StLtb Road connections are the responsibi 1 ity of the developer. E12 The.applicant should bp advised tha-t individua1 driveway access permits are required prior i;o issuance of a bi_tildinq permit for drxveway approaches to the County roaci systemo ! R~ ,r paqe 3 E13 Dedication cif 50_feet ofi adriitional Riqht-ofi-Way along Steen CU~.~rt. F16 Existinq County roads provi.clinq direct access to the plat sha11 be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County stanciarcis. E17 Th~at a11 pLiblic roads within the plat be desiqneci ancl constructed to SpoE;ane C~Dunty standardsn E19 1"he word "appl i cant" sha1 1 inc 1Ltde the owner or owners of t he proper ty, his hei rs, assi qns and suc cessars. E23 The COLtnty Er7qineer has desiqnated Typical Roadway Section IVumber Two,__Lr_,cal_Access si:andarci fiDr the improvPrnent iDf Steen_COLtrt wtiich is to he Construc•teci within the proposed development anci er;teridi.nq to e•r.istinq pavement on 12th Aveni_ie. This will requi.re the installation of 36 ft. of asphaltp The constructiiDn of curbinq is also required. E32 The proposed plat shall be i.mpriDveci to the standards sPt forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners R@so1ution hlo. 80-1592, as amended, which establishes requlations for ri-rads, approaches, drainaqe and fees in new constr+.iction. E33 The County Enqineer has examined this devel.opment proposal and has dPtermined that the impaet of this proposa1 upon the existinq County Road System warrants the dedication of additi-,nal Riqiit of Way and the roadway improvements herein speci.fiied. E90 The applxcant should be advised that there may exist utilities either i_tnderqr~DLind ~Y-r overhe~.~d affecting the applicants property, inclLtdinq property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisitiiDn. Spok:ane County will as5Ltme no financi.a1 cibliqati.on for ad.justments or relocation reqardinq these utilities. The applicant should check: with tr~e appl i cabl.e uti 1 ities ancl Spok:ane COLtnty Enqi.neer to deterrnine whether the appl i cant or uti 1 ity is responsible for ad justment or re1ocation costs and to mak:e arrangementr -for any necessary wiDrk:. Speca.al Conditions: f ~ (]aQ@ 4 Appl.icant shall demonstrate i:o the sati5faction of the COLtnty Enqineer that the pubXic ro~.~d as de]. i.neated on the preliminary plat meets public road standards for horizontal curve requirements prior to any public hearinq on this item. . . PAGE 1 13:57:20 20 JAN 1995 Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info.......... 05893~12TH AV .(START) 00.000 WEST END TO SIESTA D U 19 PAVED 50 ;12TH AV 00.010 SIESTA DR (END) U 19 PAVED 50 ! 12TH AV (END) 00.040 DISHMAN RD 05894•12TH AV (START) 00.000 UNIVERSITY RD U 19 PAVED 20 12TH AV 00.250 PIERCE RD U 19 PAVED 20 00.340 SKIPWORTH RD (END) U 19 PAVED 20 00.500 BOWDISH RD U 19 PAVED 20 00.590 WILBUR RD (END) U 19 PAVED 20 00.620 WILBUR RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 . 00.660 FOX RD ( START ) U 19 PAVED 20 ; 00.720 REEVES RD (END) U 19 PAVED 20 00.750 UNION RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 ' 00.840 ROBIE RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 00.910 WHIPPLE RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 01.000 SR 27 (PINES) U 19 PAVED 20 01.130 HOUK RD U 19 PAVED 20 01.250 VERCLER RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 01.320 VIRGINIA ST (END) U 19 PAVED 20 01.380 WOODLAWN RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 ~ - 01.510 MCDONALD RD U 19 PAVED 20 01.640 CLINTON RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 i " 01.760 BLAKE RD (END) U 19 PAVED 20 01.800 BLAKE RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 , 02.010 EVERGREEN RD U 19 PAVED 20 12TH AVE 02.170 BANNEN RD (END) U 19 PAVED 20 12TH AV 02.230 BEST RD (END) U 19 PAVED 20 t . 02.390 CALVIN RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 ' 02.450 WARREN RD (START) U 19 PAVED 20 % 02.520 ADAMS RD U 19 PAVED 22 , 02.570 MARIGOLD ST (END) U 19 PAVED 22 ~ 0 2.'6 8 0 BURNS RD ( START ) U 19 PAVED 22 02.770 PROGRESS RD U 19 PAVED 22 - 02.870 ST CHARLES (END) U 19 PAVED 22 02.920 NEWER RD (END) U 19 PAVED 22 02.980 CENTURY RD U 19 PAVED 22 ; 12 TH AV ( END ) 03.020 SULL I VAN RD 0 6 0 7 9•, 12 TH AV START ) 00.000 COLEMAN RD ( START ) U 19 UNIMPROVED 08 1112TH AV 00.120 GIR.ARD RD (START) U 19 UNIMPROVED 08 12 TH AV,( END ) 0 0. 2 5 0 PARK RD U 19 GR.AVEL 18 05892 12TH AV (START) 00.000 WEST END TO DICKEY R U 19 GR.AVEL 32 12TH AVE 00.120 BETTMAN RD (END) & D U 19 PAVED 36 12 TH AV ( END ) 00.250 EASTERN RD ( START ) 06228 12TH AV (START) 00.000 FAIRCHILD ST (START) R 09 GRAVEL 30 12TH AV (END) 00.300 BARTHOLOMEW ST (STAR 06185:12TH AVE (START) 00.000 CHRISTENSEN RD R 09 GR.AVEL 30 ; 12 TH AVE 00.250 WHEATLAND ( START ) R 09 GR.AVEL 30 ,12TH AVE (END) 00.370 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 GR.AVEL 30 06037, 12TH AVE (START) 00..000 SHAMROCK ST (END) U 19 PAVED 30 . 12TH AVE (END) 00.050 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 30 7 Records Processed .i . i . . : ; Tra f f i c Count s Road Name Location.................... Leg Count... . 16TH AE (START)* at DISHMAN-MICA RD E 04834 16TH AE (START) at DISHMAN-MICA RD W 00589 16TH AV at UNIVERSITY RD E 7694 16TH AV at UNIVERSITY RD W 6964 16TH AV at BOWDISH RD E 07295 16TH.AV , at BOWDISH RD W 06269 16TH AV (START) at CARNAHAN RD E 00866 16TH AVE at PINES RD (END) W 06610 16TH AVE at WOODLAWN RD (END) E 02789 16TH AVE at WOODLAWN RD (END) W 02473 16TH AVE at EVERGREEN RD E 03764 16TH AVE at E`IERGREEN RD W 03828 16TH AVE at ADAMS RD E 3173 16TH AVE at ADAMS RD W 02773 16TH AVE at SULLIVAN RD W 02073 16TH ~VE (START) at SALTESE AV (START) E 03945 . , ~ . . ; : .i . , , February 1, 1995; 1:15 p.m.: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHELLEY ACRES Generally located east of 12th Avenue (extended) approximately 350 feet east of the intersection of 12th Avenue and Shamrock Street in the SE1/4 of Secrion 24, Township 25, Range 44, EWM, Spokane County, Washington. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Suburban-plus and Urban both outside and within the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: Urban Residentia13.5 (UR-3.5) and Suburban- Residential l (S R-1) PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Preliminary plat to divide approximately 15.1 acres into 131ots for single-family residences and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residenda13.5 (UR-3.5) and Suburban Residential 1(SR-1) zones. PARGEL NUNIBER: 45244.9119 (PTN) SITE SIZE: Approximately 15.1 acres APPLICANT: Mark McManus Ben Simpson 921 South Monroe Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 455-5411 ASSIGNED PLANNER: Ken Kuhn j I S P O K A N E C O U N T Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM WALLIS D. HUE3BARD, DIRECTOR RECEIvIED TO: ' at er, So•ane Cou~nty Di~risio =0131811111'~g ,1 A N 1995 Brenda Sims, torm Water Uty C Jun Red, Spokane County Utihties Department M* EQglaeattAp; Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Greg Figg Department of Transportation Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Fire Protection District #1 Vera Water & Power Central Valley School FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner q- DATE: January 17, 1995 ~ RE: Preliminary Plat of Shelley Acres APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN RF,VIEW MF~TI~LQ FEBRU."Y L 1995,AT "5 PJM,t CQUNTY PLANNINC CONFERENCE RnM ZND FLQOR Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATTON ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEw MEETIlVG FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Ken Kuhn for the meeting. The attaChed APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVEEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring thrqg copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Ken Kuhn of the Planning Department at 456-2205. c: Mark McManus Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205 • FAX: (509) 456-2243 • TDD: (Sa9) 324-316b • . ' . ` SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION PART I . RECEIVED JAN 131995 A. GENERAL INFORMATION: sPCJlhANE C.C)UNTY • NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: ~~G~l~ J SK.. fa cr ne -IT A/&~- MAULING ADDRESS: --5 WO/1IZ0 ~ CITY: STATE: ~/fl ZIP: i?~G~ v PHONE: (work) F ~ (homc) , YF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. NiJk/r 1#-(*/I'lAN41S LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: 5~~ oi✓ PHONE: MAII.ING ADDRESS: 19 &1 CITY: STATE: GVi9 ZIP: PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL rr 'cJ aF y~ 4o ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED _ , STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL 7' EXISTTNG ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) (1/~...3 ~ EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY D~eN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY v SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT ~ WATER PURVEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Single family dwellings>< Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homcs ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: L.~ 9- ~P3 . . B. LEGAL INFORMATIn~L- LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 6A57- e~~ 12 7' 4. SECTION v? T TOWNSHIP 2_5 RANGB t7l NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: lG 7-~ % ~ WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: ~ o DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE. ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL YES ONO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PREL,IMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. . " . SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 IF YOU D4 NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? ~ WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FE~AKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON SURROUNDING LAND USE? C . PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CENERAL INFORMATION: NUMBER OF LOTS : /3 GROS S AREA: S/9~'.~.~ < TYPICAL LOT SIZE: PRQPOSED NET DENSITY*: 1 ~~~1/',~ SMALLEST LOT SIZE: ~~G•e ~ MINIMUM FRONTAGE: PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: Individual wells Public system Private Community System Othcr ( ) - Dcscribc: PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: Public sewer Community system Septic tank and drainfield Double Plumbing Dry Sewer Other Describe: UTILITY COMPANIES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROPOSAL: Electricity: 11E64 Sewer. 11"415 Gas: it/W 7O Water. Phone: DO YOU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THIS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER ACTIVITY RELATED TO THIS PROPOSAL? Yes No K IF YES, EXPLAIN: D . PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION IMPRovKME~,1T TALnRMATIQN: LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: Private roads Public roads K Arterial roads , Tract X roads DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE: ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISION: IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes No K IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Yes O NoA IF YES, DESCRIBE: * NET DENSITY• IS UMTS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA. - . - SUBDTVISION APPLICATION . Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN YERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIIv1TNARY CONSULTATTON WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN TFE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT . r A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. ~ B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (H*~ (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILI'TIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. n C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW: r/ r~ ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. A"A ~iq f~ 44) D . REQUIIZEMENTS INCLUDE: r -~;CFPd 75E( . > - r~- ~j FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE TLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. $ATISFACTORY ARRANGENiENTS FR STIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) BEEN MADE. ; B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: fe' r ~f . ,/7 e. f-4 1 ~ /Z n%•~ ~r.l ~i. ! ~ C~r ~V ~ l'~--G~L. / •~.C•fi'>y, ; = v r 11 CC!" / f / ~ ~ ~ WATER DISTRICT SIGNATUREfI'ITLE ~ DATE COUNTY ENGINEER ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL, REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TfT'LE DATE COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (H VE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A A. COMMENTS: (~MR! nL&T F 1OITj~ VJ 14 TE_p p►x R1_Eyu12 , ' 'Z ; 13nlcl q SIGNATURE A HEALTH DISTRICT ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE G RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL QF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE),- AVE,NC~~~ BEEN SATISFIED. . A. COMMENTS: ~J / r~'~'~ S~fG~GLC" ..~~•1' e7~..5' y - , F~rv ~2 3a 9 . ~ GNAT"tJRElI'ITLE DA SEWER PURVEYOR ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: --qLI t~~ rTf_ i ~L EIXSI'G ATCUREA . r , : . C UBDIVIS ION A,PPLICATION Page 4 of 4 PART III SURVEYOR VERIFTCATTON ' I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICE AVE COMPLETED 1HE INFORMATION REQUESTED. THE LEGAL DE M= Y PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR . LJNDER MY SUPERV IS ION IN C ~IEE . QUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING/SUBDIVISION REGUL THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. SIGNED: C DATE: I ZZ-~► ~ ~ - ' ~ : ;•z . ADDRES S: PHONE: C'~.~.R s• • . . CI~/ •':I r a ZIP: ~ ci I ~ / FX~IF2CQ 1?I•;l ~f ~ ~ PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETI'ER OF AUTHORIZATTON) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OVVNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ~ I . SIGNED: r7t DATE: I 3 " ~ . ADDRES S:~ 1!~52 Z V/9Gcey 'W'0~ty PHONE: ZLP: ~ SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT0 REPRESENTATIVE DATE /9irlD STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SIGNED AND SWORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF ~ 199*, B Y Nd . 510N / • . SE - , ~ - , ~ 0 N No ublic in or. c Siatc of Washingt~) C p ~y AZ Residing at: .01. , MY aPPointment ~xpires: ~ wAS~ PART V (TO BE COMPLETED BY 1'HE PLANNING DEPARTMEN'I) DATE SUBMITI'ED: q ~FILE -0 DATE ACCEPTED: BY: TOTAL FEES: RECEIPT ~ ~ • SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING . PRELIIdIINARY SUBDIVISI4N APPLICATION ~ PART I . A. GENERAL INFORMATION: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: -~~~~l4l S - MAILING ADDRESS: ~I -.5 1,;1O/1/.eO er, . CITY: ~,~0//~l~'U~ • STATE: ZTP: 14~7Zd `f' , PHONE: (work) (homc) ' IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. . LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Bkri ~ SO~~N 0/t/ PHONE: MAII.ING ADDRESS: CITY: 51peh2AM~ STATE: Xe ZIP: _ - . . ~ PROJECT/PROFOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq. ft) , ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 14ZZ-j--0A) l/ oc- ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED &~2 V z/, 9~/ 9 ~ STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL CW.'Sr OC ~Z ~ EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) S~ie-l EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY &4e- N COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY SCHOOL DISTRICT FIRE DISTRICT I WATER PURVEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PR4PERTY: Single family dwellings)K- Duplexes Multifamily dwellings Manufactured homes ( ) Busincss ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other ( ) - Describe: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: B. LEGAL INFORMATInN; ~ LOCATION OF PROPOS AL:, J6As7- i~` SECTION o? T TOWNSHIP RANGE NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: l Z f-~ i WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: G D. DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE, ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL YES (>~NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SUBDIVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. - . •.J` ~ ~ ' • i l . ' jBDMSION APPLICATION . Page 3 of 4 PART II ' THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINA.RY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCORPORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPAR11viENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS • IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILITIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIlZE FLOW: ; OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFIlVITIVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION TIME. . D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY AR.RANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW . REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. B. REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS: WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE COUNTY ENGINEER ~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIRENLENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: . ~ . . . r.. . << < d ~z~~-Yo . ~ - SIGNATURE E DATE . COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE . HEALTH DISTRICT A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE iD=GE RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) AVE N; BEEN SATISFIED. . A. COMMENTS j ~ - CVGNATURE/TITLE DA . SEWER PURVEYOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: SIGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE ~ - _ • 1 ~ PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT Date: Number: Name Phone Address Comments: CUSTOMER ROUTING , . ' :':~':ii:.}::.: i:' ':,'v' • ' : . . . . - _ - .r. . .....~:.v..:._:. . } BUIL r'.r'r . •:..tiii::.:':: •:~:r:::?•: ~ : . . . . . ~ . . ..ti t ...n-..' . •v:7':r ;}}:r.. f::?i:?:n•: S. v. . . '.~.,r.•." ` .DING . De artme~t ~r;.::>N ::;<:r;::;:_<::~:: • l•. : . . : ' ~ ' •:t:{;:} ~,f~ntiti ~::v'•" : }i •r: r: - . . _ _ Department ...r.ti• : '??$?i:: " f . - P . .y..ry . ~.PLXNNING_ NGINEER S~:De. .,par#m Addressing . i Admin. Exception . = Approach Permit Building Permit Arterial Rd Plan Info , Flood Plain Permit ~ Code Inforruation Binding Site Plan Info i Public/Private Roads ~ Commercial Review Cert. of Exemption i Res. Bldg Permit Rev. Conference Comprehensive Plan ~ Site Drainage Info _ - ~ S gC L-L-1 /A- CK.-t~S _ Energy Code Info ~ Cond. Use Permit Subdivision Review Fire Safeh► Review = Nonconforming Use : Utility Permit ~ Manufactured Home i Permit Review i Zone Change Review f Mech:nical Permits Shorelines Info '~~s2''i"'t'• ~ C~~ ~ Othcr Permits ! Short Plat Info NO ~~E ItEQiIIKKED - s Revicwer Time out ~ Plumbing Perniits i Subdivision Info ~ . . .:.r:.... ! . . Private Road Info Ternp. Use Permit ~UTi LITIES" D .e ..p tti'ttlent::•:•.:;,':':;`'~'-~'"~;;:<;~: ! Residcntial Review Variance Appl. s APA Payment Sewer Permits ~ Zone Check _ Cert. of Exemption ! Zone Info Subdivision Review ULID/Sewer Info 7.onc Changc Review ! NO ~ s1? tZ1:QUIRTI7 NO IFF.Is XE QUIIZLD Revicwer 'I'irnc out Rcvicwcr "1'imc out ltevicw~cr Time out A1JLS'11:RTASSPOR1.CfR 1II1193 ~ ~ ` REQLJEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION $30.00 DATE 10/14/99 ROAD NAME C 0 UR TV EY LANE CRP/RID # NAME OF PLAT SHELLEY ACRES Plat#' Pl 773 ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 S T R FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # PROJECT LIMITS EXISTIlNG CONDITIONS: . PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH - 16' (Private Drive ) ROAD SURFACE A sphal t AVG. DAII.Y TRAFFIC 2 0- 3 0 A D T Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION Shel 1 e y A c r e s i s a 13 1 o t p1 at. C o u r tn e,y L an e i s an a c c e s s lane to serve 4 of the lots. All lots will nave frontage on Steen Court, but tnese 4 homes will be served 'oy Courtney Lane. PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION Use of a 241 wide driveway drop instead of curb returns. (See attached plan. ) HLULIVED SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER NSTIFICATION: We were told at the beginning of the proj ect (b,y Doug Busko of the Count,y Engineers) that the entrance to the nrivate drive should look like a , driveway and not have curb returns. Initially we were told to not have a drivec,ray drop, - P~ The private drive will have limited use and will fu residential driveway. HECEIVED n 90 51'UKANE COUNTY ENGINEER O~+ 30891 q ~ .a clsTSR~ 1 SUBMTTTED BY MLTRO ENGIVEERING, INC. , Joel G. Lee, P. E. sslo~ ~/14/99 A.DDRESS S. 324 Sherman, Spoltane, WP G 99202 (509) 624-9351 ~ PHONE # f 1 ADNIIVLST][tATIVE VA►RIANCE FEE OF $30•00 PAID TO SPOKANE COiJNTY ' 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0170 PHONE (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 ~ -REQUF,S"I' WII.L NOT BE REVIEWHD WTTHOUT FUNDS- CASHJ HE ~ # 20P RECEIVED BY lbD AVIM DATE 0:2%r 2 f cC?o' k\tidaign.dev 2I96 • r 14 I •1 I 1 1 L+! I I ~ 1 ✓ ( I o+oo 1+00 ~ 2~00 ~ 3+00 8. - RIP-RAP AT PIPE OUTLETS WITH MINIMUM DIMENSIONS AS SHOWN. 50% OF RIP-RAP TO 8E 3" OR IARGER (d50=3"). M(N. 6" THICK. RIP-RAP SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE ~o 0o WITH SECTION 9-13.1 OF THE WSOOT/APWA ,~~•9ZZ STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 0 ~a G ~ DRAINAGE PIPE ~ ~ - - - ~ o ~ S ~ ~ ~ r ~ .3±00 .7~~ ° , ~ • 0446'13" 3 ~ k~~ i ~ ~ aP DETAIL 7 ~ ~ - ' ~ o I t0 SCALE ~ ^ / ~ 30' PRIVATE N / • * / ~ DRIVE EASEMENT STA. 0+9 2.00 ~ 1~ W.S.D.O.T. GRATE INLET TYPE 2 / 6 ~ (1 PIECE BASE) w/TYPE "A" GRATE T.O.G. EL.=2045.28 o I.E. = 2043.08 ~ . / 54 L.F. 0F 8„ CPEP, ADS N-12 CO Ppoy ljo CORRUGATED PIPE (INSTALL PER ~i 50' PAVEMENT TAPER TO MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION) TYPICAL ROAD SECTION SLOPE - 0.70~ ~Alz~038 , , . STA. 0+39.89, 18' RT. ;F F 0+69.63 1 RIP-RAP OUTLET PER DEfAf I.E. = 2042.70 , 2046 \ 5 STREET NAME SIGN, PER M.U.T.C.D. 04 .Z0421 ,pl'SL= ~ . t d'.a 24' DRIVEWaY APPROACH PER ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ' ~-•ti~~ ~ ' I : ' • SPOKANE C0. DETAIL A--7 • • ~ ' ~ o ~ . . . ' • . , . . . ~ . - ..~-r . ~ . ~a oo+o~i~ ~ ~ •t. s°z~ LI N E TAB LE ,8s'C s-; _ s.i.: ~ BEARING ~ LENGTH 0+00 COURTNEY LANE + N 75'43'46" E ~ 59.63' 10+79.48 STEEN COURT ~ 6:~• ~ ~ 9,~~ 1\; 4 3 - CONSTRUCTION NOTES: A_L ITEmS CF CONSTRUCT(ON SHALI. 8E COMPLETEG !N ACCORGANC£ `flITH THE 5) IF THE COt1TRACTnR DIS.O!E-~" - - nr.►ic~7r. inTin.K. /'r'ni~ATI^rIC r"~Ir`('Itt~TCf:C, Tt1: ~ • ~ - ~ - _ . • - - ---~~-...:._.~s.~- ~ - - - ~ - - . 2293 ` METRO ENGINEERING INC. a PH 509-6249351 324 S SHERMAN 28-8270/3251 SPOKANE, W A 9 9 2 0 2 pATF I i J , I 3 PAY'['O Tt[E 00 oRDER oF ~ ~y, ~i un~r f~•iw•~ ~ QOLI.ARS E]S•e ' T ~y' . D•~~n~ ew e~ca. ~ . - . ' Spokaae Toche:s Credit Onloa . _ • _ ' SM Pou Omcs B~ 5264 ~ $Qpkaoe. WA 947054281 . ~ , - . • - ~ ~ D&V. ~ FoR AC'Ye; AP ~1: 3 2 5 LB 2 7004 100 500 7 L L8 4 9u• 2 3 . , _ - - oH^Mmo ~ . - . Received From: MOO ri~ . Receipt No. 107495 Address: Date: 4rv--~!24 cCj'w z Acct. No.: p1~13 Amount Paid: ~ ~ Cash: ❑ Sales Tax: Amt. of Acct: ' U ` Money Order: ❑ Total Paid ~ w ~ : . z Amt. Paid Check: - Crieck # ZZq3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ...+-w r ~ , `a Balance Due: ~Credit Card:r ~=Exp:~ Date: ~ 0 Purpose: X54t4 VA'E •4~~ : t~ii ~ ' .r ~ t - t : : " --*,~'`5~r--^ - ; • ^ '^'ra.''~'`.5,~'~'~C~i.`:,::+~ ~ ~:-r~-- Received by: ~ j~j ~ 1 O ~ X'1'1sTIcs ~i~ clicck I~~cc d1L Nuinbcr of l..ois ,toacl lvtilcs (Nc,v) 3 Z royl nrc~1~ ~ ~ , . . . . . . _ _ _ . - - - . . /5 - 7S Norcli Arrow - - - - - . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . ~ 0~..- - ' Sc.1lc . ~ J J_cgcnd ~ . • I'roccclures Sc Equipi»cnt ~ Wsis,orucnc;ngs . ( e!Vc~-P 1'ht Loucion Dy 'I'iile Official Signiturc Dlocks ~ ~5 l ~~t.✓N~ ~ C°'f 5urvcyors Ccrtif icnic ltoncl N,►mcs . r IZoncI 1`licllhs Acljnccm Acc;% l..ot Sc 131ock Numbcrs i li/1V Ucclicalion clcsignmcd _p ~7. 1 Fool Slrips 3 1tI'S oii GLO Coriiccs '1'uicc X ~ r Lv l/\ rc ns q&fc, - llcncli Nt;irk • Clostirc ~ . ~ . _ ul.ll~CA 1 ION I Dcscril)(ioii (7'o ht:,p) Dcscrip(ion (To Ccrt) Owncrs I ~ ccrtiftcatc co ['hc 1 Fooc Strips " 1tlU - Cl'lt Slatcnicnt AYJA- Acccss ['rohibitccl lZ/1Y Dcclication , urainagc L:ii,guagc - ~ . uc~i~i~~c Covcn, i,t Ir rlooJ liistirai►,cc 20u uu►►(i5 - $1,Ooo.00 en 208 1'LnNS AP1'ltOVCU 1-11a~I-V' 02` l'riwitc itolcl Doc, ll's 1'rivalc ltond 1V-nrning ~p Rvad I'laiis / lo s Itoacl Uoiicl lmprovcinc:nt Itosicl Uo<<cl 111spcclioil Sipccl Uy Giigiiiccr ~ ~r - - i\I\10 -aIlisl.ck9/)S__.... . . - - - _ . . e WTICd•dt~~W. ~r.~ ~f.J ~ . .i . ~ .I~i. ♦ .Ol '~1~ ~J• . ~ . . ( ~ , F k S P O K A N E C O U N T Y PLANMNG A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gary Oberg, Director MEMORANDUM TO: Dave Berto, L.S. ~ FROM: James Richardson, Associate Planner ~ DATE: March 22, 2000 RE: Final Plat Mylars for Shelley Acres; PE-1773-95/ZE-7-95 Please review the attached final plat mylars for Shelley Acres Addition. I have also attached a plat certificate and the Drainage Declaration of Covenants referenced in the plat dedication. If you have any questions you may contact me at ext. 7168, or stop by in person. Yours in anticipation, Attachments 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477•7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133 ~ p -7 ~ , • ~ - 4462634 , 03~10J2004 ~41;59P TRdNSNbTiQN. ?1TLF 1NS (xl (;OV 310.00 Sookane Ca. WA Spol:anc County Lnginccrs ] O2C W Broaclway - Spol:anc WA 99260-0170 509)477-3600 COUZ?E5" f,FCu^p,%N; Documcnt l'itle DECLARATION OF COVEN'ANT Refcrcncc Numbcrs P/~ 7.~ 9~ 3 Lrbal nescription .S-o-E C,F 1✓ T~ jAh S~ ~I LI oZ ~I ' a 5' y(4 P.ircel Numbcr Crantc>i•s ancl Cra►itccs 'Tar~/r In consideratian ot' the approval by Spokan; County ot/~C7,~~ o0VQb-V (hereunafter referrecl to as the "Development"), the undersigned covenwits and agrees that: 1. T11c subdividerlsponsor will construct tlie private roads nnd associated di•ainabe facilities in conformance with the approved plans on f lE in the Couiity Engineer's Oi'tlce. 2. A loc is scrved vy a private road Nvhen: a. (he only road frontage for the lot in the Developrnent is on the private road, or; l). a lot having frontage on more than one road (public or private) constructs an approach to the privale road. 3. 'n1e Uw[1CC(S) Of 111y lot created by the Development or alternation thereor and served by a pivate roaci shall be responsible lOI' I111117Iellance of said privatc road, inclucling associated drainage facilities in conformancc with approvecl plans on file witll the Counly Engineers office. -l. Maiiitcnlnce; II[1111C1I1g OI' the private roads :tnd associated cirainagc Cacilities shall be in il 111111I1t1' CICCCPIIIIIIeti by the owner ` a. die majority of lots servecl by sucli private roacl;, ~ ► . rootage of`t~ts-ser-~c~-1~-s~a~r~~t-i•rt~-r-e~c-l;-e~ d. • . 5. In thc event such private road, including associated drainage facilities is improvecl to Spokane County standards for public streets, and the County is willing to accept thc dedication of such road and facilities, each lot owner shall execute aily documents necessary to accomplish such dedi~cation. 6. Owners of lots within die Development who are served by such road, may sue and recover clamages and attorney's iees from aity owner of any 1ot witliin thc Devtlopmc:nl wllicli is similarly served who rel'usccl to participate in clle road and dr<<inase facilitics, constrtiction, financing, ancl maintcnanee. VVAMN1NC: Spokane Cocrriry llas rlo responsibility to Uuild, iiilprove, or mairltain ot- othenvise service the private roads, inclr.rding associarcri d,aincge jr.:cil'l.l-.S, contnined ►villiiii nr pro>>icling serviee to t/re propei7y (lescrihed in t/tis Developntenl. B), accenting this Developitient or srrnseyicently by altoti>>irtg a l;ltliding pern~it rn be issrr.ed for propeity on a private road, Spokanr• Corcnty ussrunes iro obligation for saicl privace 1-oad and the . owireis hereh>> ackno►vledge thnt 11re Cotuiry ftas no ohligtitioic of uny, kirid of natrrre whnts•oever to estafilislc, eCa»liire, strrvey, caistrrrct, aller, reparr improve, maiiltain, provide (lr(iinage or snow removal on a private rond, or associated cliainase facilities. 1 r ~ ° - - - - 4462634 • ' Pae; 2of3 ~ ` 03~14J2000 01;59P + . TRANSNATiQN. TiTI F 1N9 CQ COV S10.00 Sookane N. WA_ 8. This covenant and agreement shall run with dle land anci shall be binding upon he owncr, theic heirs, successors ar assigns, including the obligation to participate in dle maintenancc oi= the private road, and drainage facilities as provided herein. ~ , OWNrER "OWNER DATED diis day of 20 O O S'I'ATE OF WASHINGTON ) Coruiq, of Spokauie ) Ori tliis (lay pcrsaially appeared Uefore nie 6{/:rG4.,77.9~ . kno►vii to nie to be tlte indivitlual(s) described in atid wlro e,recuted the ivitliin and foregoing iiYStrirment utul ackizowledged t/iat he/slie/tJiey signed the same as /lis/Icer/tlieir free aiid volluitury act aird deed for rhe uses and piriposes tlrerein stcctett. GlVE, N UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEf1L tliis jn' dayof 2000. - MEACy*1 _ i • `f40 ,.N „ty''++ ~ ~A i ~ ; Nntrriy\ptrblic in ar lfoi• tlie State . Ot ,p ae of Wasliit2gtori, res~ling at Spokatze , or- Mi«iapr ir_ooo 2 r-~ ~ - - ~ R . ' 4462fi34 I Q3~10J2000 o41359P • TRANSNAT10N. TITLE INS CO C4V _110.00 _ Sookane Co. WA COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of the Southeaet quarter of the Southeast quarter'of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East W.M.; thence North 0 26'34"East, 911.95 feet along the West line of eaid Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence North 0 26'34•'East, 1067.97 feet; thence North 64 14102"East, 368.57 feet; thence South 89 15'08"Eaet, 337.11 feet; thence South 0 29159"Weat, 890.05 feet; thence South 62 26'36"West, 721.90 feet; thence North 89 33126"West, 29*.50 feet to the Point of Beginning; Situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. ~ ~ i i - , - i ~ 0 3 aov~ ~ . . - . . . , , - . . : - . . . ti ~ Cr ~ 7 ~ ~ . p ~ t1G~1,':r,~~y~ ;•it r~l '';j' MAR 1 0 2000 VvN (0-3y ~ ti~~~~k,iiic (.;i►iiiily I;n~;in~~ri:S 1 U2li W liro:►dw;ty ,tip(l::mc \1'A 9)260-(I171) 509)477-361)(1 Oucaimclil 'I'illc I)I:(::I.AItA'I'IUN OF-CUV1?NAN7' Itcfcrcncc Nunilbcrs P1:-7 11' c~ • i.ega1 ()cscriptioll SF P.irccl N~imber L/, (:i~:►~~tui~~ cl Glc cs 5/Z/FL lii consiclcr:iliun c►f Ilic .ipproval by Spuok;~lu Coilnty c►I_.~i~GG~f~/~~~ (licrciiialicr rcli:rrctl 1o :is (lie "I)cvrlopnicnl"), ilic iin(lci-sibiicc( covcii:inls mid .igrccs (lial: I. ThL• sululiVidCr/sl)Oilaor will construd tlic privalc i'oacls 1111d sissoc;isilc(l clr.tinabc facililic:s in coiil'urniance with thc appiovccl pIans on lilc ii► ilic Cuunly L113inecr's 0I*11ct. 2. A Iol is.w.rvrel by a priv;ile i'o;id wIlc:n: a. ilic Only road fironlagc 1i01- ilic IoI in (lic laeve;lopincnt is on ilic priv:tte n►.ul, ur; I). a Iu1 having I'roiitubc uil iiuorc llian c>nc: io.lcl (piiblic oi- priv.ite) c:onstnicts an appro:ich lca tlie piivale ro;ul. 1. Tlie c►wncr(s) ol'tiny Io( crealed l►y ilic I)cvClol)iitcilt Or aIlcrnalion Ilicreof and sei-ved hy ;i piv;ilc roae) sh.ill hc rcspi>nsiblc liOr mainlcncince cil' saicl priv;ilc rcrut, iiiclucling .issocialccl clr;iinagc I';tciiitics iii coi11,01-11mnce Wiili .ippravccl pI;ins on lilc wi11i ilic Couiily l:ngiiiccrs ol'lice. •J. NIaiiilci►ancc I'iii,inciiig of ilic privalc ro:idti ciiul atisoci;~~cd drciin.igefincililicS sli:ill be in :i ii1.uiiui dCiCIniinL•(I b), ilic ~~~vii~rS~~=----•- a. ilic m;ijority oI' lots sc;rvccl by sticli priv;itc ro.lcl;~ -Elie-111~4t~-ef-I4eI Ila-11 e-rji=-Fc,rs-servrd-hy--st ie~~40valG-reaclt- lrt1C"l()tagc -oTMt,.s-servc:cl by such privatc roaca; oi= d. . . 5. In Ilic cvcnt sucli private ro;tcl, Inclutliug ,issocialccl dr7iuagc Cacililies is iniprovecl tc> Spuokane Cc~uniy slancl,iicls lilr pi►blic siiccts, 4111cl lhc Counly 'ts williiig lo acccpt Ih~, dccliraltun ol' sucli rnacl tiiul fiu:ilitics, c:acli lot owner ,Irill cxcculc iiiiy clncuIIIcntti ucccssary 10 acconiplish sucli clcclicalion. C,. nwne:rs ol' IoIs within iIie Devclopincnt wlio are ti:rvccl hy sticli road, may sue aucl recovcr clsinrascs ancl s111oriiev's li:~~s I'r~~i>> :ii~y c»~~iic:r c~f tiil_y Int williiii tlic I)evc:lc►piticnl wliicli is simil,irly u:rvccl wlio rc:l'usLA lo s 7 ~ 'I'Iiis rovcnaiu .ind abrccnicnl sliall i-uii with Ilic I,iiicl and slmll hc hincliiib ulloii bc uwncr, Ilicir lieirs, succcssurs or <issiuns, iiicluelinb Ilic obligalion to parlicipale in tlie i»:iinlensince of llie; private rcrul, ancl clrainabc Cacililirs as pruvitled lici'eiii. • . 0 NvncIt Ol-VN C:It DnTED Iliis clay 0 I' Aw e, 2O U 0 .S 1 A"I'!s Ul% IV,I,SIIING%'ON ) C'nniily o/',Spnkultc ) Oli rl~i.~ ~lri~~ ~~c~~~.c~►~icr!!1' n~~~~c~c~rc~~l l~c~%ur~~ ~►ic (i{~.Z~GC.1'~9i1'L.__~~/f'.~ ~ ~2 L~~~~.~ ~ ~ . ~~N-k-J ~ krtintvi Io iiie lo be ilie inrlirithitrl(s) dcsc'iibed iit n►t(l ►i-lio c.rer.iNr;d llic 1141hilt and forcrgoing iirsil rrnic'lii ni)(l ne'knoivlecl~r,d ilrn1 lie%she/they sigitet! 11ie sanre ris hi.c/her/Ihcir f'ree nncl voluu►ary ac< <riicl decr! fnr ilie uses crnr( pui pnse.c Iherrin slnted. G/ 1'l'N UN1)/s'R llt I' 11i1 ND i1 ND OFr'/C'li1 .S/sil l, rlris &r>> o/' 20 - MEAey ~ . . H . (J Nntniy 'iihlir, innl ( t for tlre 5tnlc.- , . OC ;p ae pj I~thislringlat, r•esl~ling ni Spokane Au ' P Y o Lv ~ 7•16.4 OG ~ COMM@NCING at the Southwesl corner of the Southeaet quarter of the Souttieast quarter 'of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East W.M.; thence North 0 26'34"East, 911.95 feet along the West line of eaid Soutiieaet quarter oE the Southeast quarter to the True Point of Beginning of l-hie deacripti.on; tlience North 0 26'34"East, 1067.97 feet; thence Nortli 64 14'02"East, 368.57 feet; tlience Soutli 89 15'08"East, 337.11 feet; ttience South 0 29' S9"West, 890.05 feet; ttietice Soutti 62 26' 36"Weel, 72 1. 90 feet; ttience North 89 33'26"West, 29'.50 feet to the Point of Heginning; Situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washi.ngton. i-- ~ l 723 4465539 , 43~22/2000 ~ 10 05A t`~1 FNf; fAU g0.00 Sonkane fn. WA AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Spol:arte County Public Works Development Engineering Services, 2"d Floor 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Document Title: Drainage Declaration of Covenaat Grantor: Harley Manz and Geraldine Manz, W. Main Corporation, Shelley Acres Subdivision Joint Venture, Mark McManus Grantee: Spokane County, Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1 of the Plat of Shelley Acres Abbreviaied Legal Description: Portion of SE of Section 24, T. 25 N., R44 E. Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 45244.9119 County Reference No. P 1773 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER' S OFFICE Spokane County, Washington . DRAINAGE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of The Plat of Shelley Acres Addition, Spokane County Project No. PE-1773, (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat"), undersigned covenants and agrees that: Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby ganted the right to ingess and egress to, over and from all drainage easements for the purposes of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, ponds, ditches, culverts and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the property owner or the responsible parties. Spokane County does not accept the responsibiiity to inspect or maintain drainage facilities located outside of public rights-of-way, except in cases where Spokane County specifically assumes that responsibility in writing. Neither does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the property owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. The property owners within this plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. If the property owners fail to maintain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or drainage facilities on private properties, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it conected, at the expense of the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots or floodplain areas within private lots, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots , shall be gradad so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swate or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. All drainage facilities for this plat, including any `208' swales, shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Any proposed changes to the approved road and drainage plans must be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said changes. E. ~ • Tax Exempt . Date ~ 1i 20 p~~ uBy ~ 4 4465539 , 03~2212000 ~10;05A rn F~ mV 40.flf1 SnnkanP Cn. Wb There may exist properties located uphill and adjacent to this subdivision which periodically discharge stormwater runoff onto individual lots within this plat. Stormwater runoff from nearby uphill properties should be expected, and during snow melt periods or wet seasons the lots may be subjected to higher amounts of stormwater runoff that what is normally observed or anticipated. Because stormwater runoff ' from adjacent properties have discharged onto this plat prior to development, stormwater runoff will likely continue to do so after development. The property owners within this plat shall maintain all water quality swales ("208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on their respective properties, and any partion of a`208' swale situated in a public right- of-way adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified in the currently approved and accepted plans on file at Spokane County's Engineer's Office. No structures, including fences, shall be constructed directly over or within a`208' swale without the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and/or maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County acr,ept any liability for any failure by the lot owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. Spokane County hereby accepts responsibility for maintaining the drywells located in Swates "A", "B", and "C". The owners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1, and their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities, located in easement "D" in conformance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County's Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not limited to, keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drywells, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage facilities as needed, and maintaining live native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. 6wners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block l, and their successors in interest shall be equalty responsible for payment of all claims and other liabilities which may bacome due for said maintenance responsibilities. 4 The owner of Lot,0 of Block 1, and their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities, located in easement "E" in conformance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County's Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not limited to, keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drywells, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage facilities as needed, and maintaining live native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolatio of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The owner of Lot ~f Block 1, and their successors in interest shall be responsible for payment of all claims and other liabilities which may become due for said maintenance responsibilities. If the responsible parties, or their successors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the accepted drainage plan on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office, a notice of such failure may be given to the re:sponsible parties, or their successors in interest, by the County Engineer. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the responsible parties, or their successors in interest. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land in perpetuity, and sha11 be binding upon the owner, theu heirs, successors and assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the drainage facilities as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this 2_/ S T day of 2000. ERALDINE MANZ J State of Washington ) ~ - 4465539 , a3~22120Q0 o 10,05A )ss County of Spokane ) CO ENG CUV $4.04 SpOkdne C0. WA I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Harley Manz and Geraldine Manz, husband and wife are the persons who app8ared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated a I ' 0c) ' S. ~ la&zw o yr ~ublic in and for the State of Washingion. My Appointment Expires: SHELLEY ACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE ~45'0J O~q O Z W.MAIN CORPORATION T11 h• By: lts: ~oFwP State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that j,A Aa4ti At, ri.~ is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, on oath s~ted that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the l/t c--c ?~r4s ~~ja of W. Main Corporation as g~}~..o•~ra~~ 4.9e~.~f the Shelley Acres Subdivision Joint Venture to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated U` 0?04?60e) 4~6tfary Public in and for the State of Washington. My Appointment Expires: 8-15' -D / ROBERT D. WALDO , MARK McMANUS STATE OF WASHINGTON NOTARY PUBLIC ~ State of Washington ) UY COidItISS10N EXPtRES 8-15-01 )ss . County of Spokane ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mark McManus is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, o oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the !t u D~-~con1~•c~QyP,c~f the Shelley Acres Subdivision Joint Venture to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the i strument. Dated D-HD ' Gi%%5~ -r~ fl-o-t-ary Public in and for the State of Washington. My Appointment Expires: ROBERT D. wALDO STA1E pF WASHINGTOH NOTARY••`M pUgi.1C ~ ~Y tpltltlSS10N EXP1REg 9-1" H/' / v C OPY ~AMMy P'LE0 OR RECORDEp MAR 2 2 2000 e0Ji~7 `I Y A1iD170fi o ~ SPOKANE C013NTV WN. ~v V~~~-3'~: , '_-y "=^n, ' • . • ~ ..E~ N ' • • _ 2.Ii My}- _ _ • -j'.•; y` * ~ T J ' ~ a _ • !p ♦ / i ~ . '•'c ' r ' i~`i AFTER RECORDINC RETURN TO: SPokane CountY Public Works Developmeni Engineering Services, 2od Floor 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spol:ane, WA 99260-0170 Document Title: Drainage Declaration of C • .3~ ~ Grantor: Harley Manz and Geraldine Manz, W. Main Co~ t4 V.. _ _ _AcManus Grantee: Spokane Counry, l..ots 4, 5, and 6 of Block I of the Plat of Shelley Acres Abbreviated Legal Description: Fortion of SE of Section 24, T. 25 N., R.44 E. Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 45244.9119 County Reference No. P1773 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE Spokane County, Washington ~ DRAINAGE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of The Plat of Shelley Acres Addition, Spokane County Project No. PE-1773, (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat"), undersigned covenants and agees that: Spokane County and its authorizetl agents are hereby ganted the right to ingress and egress to, over and from all drainage easements for the purposes of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, ponds, ditches, cuiverts and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the property owner or the responsible parties. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect or maintain drainage facilities located outside of public rights-of-way, except in cases where Spokane County specifically assumes that responsibility in writing. Neither does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the property owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. The property owners within this plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. If the property owners fail to maintain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or drainage facilities on private properties, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it COITCCtPd, at the expense of the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots or floodplain areas within private lots, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not timited to, inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. Any building ihat is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the•building for a distance of at least IO feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. All drainage facilities for this plat, including any `208' swales, shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Any proposed changes to the approved road and drainage plans must be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said changes. R E'yn "xempt ' 20 }w . BY ~ There may exist properties located uphitl and adjacent to this subdivision which periodically discharge stormwater runoff onto individual lots within this plat. Stormwater runoff from nearby uphill properties should be expected, and during snow melt periads or wet seasons the lots may be subjected to higher amounts of stormwater runoff that what is normally observed or anticipated. Because stormwater runoff from adjacent properties have discharged onto this plat prior to development, stormwater runoff will likely continue to do so after development. The property owners within this plat shall maintain all water quality swales ("208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on their respective properties, and any portion of a`208' swale situated in a public right- of-way adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified in the currently approved and accepted plans on file at Spokane County's Engineer's Office. No structures, including fences, shall be constructed directly over or within a`208' swale without the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect andlor maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the lot ovmer(s) to properly maintain such areas. Spokane County hereby accepts responsibility for maintaining the drywells located in Swales "A", "B", and "C". The owners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1, and their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities, located in easement "D" in conformance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County's Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not limited to, keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drywells, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage facilities as needed, and maintaining tive native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. 8wners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1, and their successors in interest shall be equally responsible for payment of all claims and other liabilities which may become due for said maintenance responsibilities. 4 The ovviier of LotO of Block l, and their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities, located in easement "E" in conformance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County's Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not iimited to, keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drywells, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage facilities as needed, and maintaining live native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolatio of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The owner of Lot ~f Block 1, and their successors in interest shall be responsible for payment of all claims and other liabilities which may become due for said maintenance responsibilities. If the responsible parties, or their successors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the accepted drainage plan on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office, a notice of such failure may be given to the responsibte parties, or their successors in interest, by the County Engineer. lf not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the responsibie parties, or their successors in interest. This covenant and agreement shali run with the land in perpetuity, and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successars and assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the drainage facilities as provided herein. 1N WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this S T day of 2000. ERALDINE MANZ ~ State of Washington ) ~ ~ - ' i r )SS County of Spnkane ) I certafy that I know or have satisfactvey evidence that Harley Manz and Geraldine Manz, husband arid wife are the persons who appeared before rne, and said persans acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it xo be their free and voluntaay act for the uses and purposes mentinned in the ins#rument. ❑ated e. ' o Oublic in and f€ar the State of Vtilashingkon. My Apguinhnent Expires: 10 SHELLEY ACRES Si.TBI]iV1SION JDiNT VENTURG ~ 0 , Z U W.MA1N CORPORATIC~N 'F'us~ ~ By: Its: 0 F ~ ~ . State ofWashington )ss County of Spnkane } 1 certify that i know or have satisfactory evidence that 1~1194-.q M6 is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed thrts instrument, on aath qated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the i/ i c-t '~v,4s J}p f-- of W. Main Gorporatian as i ka~krz ed Q9 -eiA~f the Shelley Acres Subdivis`ron Joint V'enture to be the free and votuntary act o-f such par#y for the uses and purpases mentioned in the instrurrnent. Dated ~ ~'z'z 446fia'ry Pub lic in and far the S#ate of Washington. My Appointment Expires: 9-15 --6 ~ . ~ ROBERT D. VVALDO STATE DF WAS1~INGT4N . MAtK mcMANUs i~{ `~'y ,f7.RTf11 fY l~*~r P~7~+LIC State nf Washington ~ UY COM1llSS10N MIE$ 8-15-01 )SS Cou-nty of 5pakane ~ I c-ertify tha# x knaw or have satisfac#ory evidence that Mark McN1anus is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, c~ oath stated tha# they were authorized to e~cecute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ~ r~ }~r.~ ~l~f the Sheiiey Acres Subdivision Joint ~Ienture to be the free and voluntary act of such party fof #he uses and purposes mentioned in tl~e istrument. Dated o ~-~c~ lotary Puhlic in and for the State of ~Vashington. ]V[y Appointment E~cpires: 7- l ~ -0 ~ _ iAlE or wAs"1~~~~~ ~ PU~LI~i 5~1~-41 COIA1MS14ti EORES Office of the County Engineer Spokane County, Washington 17 March 2000 To: Landmark Surveyors Willard Boatwright, P.L.S. From: Development Eagineering Services Ed Parry, P.E. RE: P1773 - Shelty Acres Plat Dedication Please note: The Drainage Declaration of Covenant is to be signed by the Title Owner's. Please submit the signed Declaration of Covenant to the County Engineer's Offce. The County will record the document. Please note that the County Assessor's Office has strict requirements on document size and margins. The Declaration of Covenant will need to adhere to these requirements. This includes, but is not limited to: a 3" margin at the top of the first page, a 1" margin at the top of all other pages, and 1" margins on the remaining three sides. An electronic copy of the Covenant is available upon request. Plat Dedication Drainage easements "A", "B", and "C", as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff from public rights-of-way, are hereby granted to Spokane County. Drainage easement "D", as platted and shown hereon, which is for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff from Courtney Lane, are hereby granted to the owners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1. All drainage easements, lots and tracts are subject to the separate Drainage Declaration of Covenant as recorded under Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a part hereof. . AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Spokane County Public Works Development Engineering Services, 2od Floor 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Document Title: Drainage Declaration of Covenant Grantor: Harley Manz and Geraldine Manz, W. Main Corporation, Shelley Acres Subdivision Joirrt Venture, Mark McManus Grantee: Spokane County, Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1 of the Plat of Shelley Acres Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of SE '/4 of Section 24, T. 25 N., R.44 E. Assessor's Taac Parcel Numbers: 45244.9119 County Reference No. P 1773 SPOK:ANE COUNTY ENGINEER' S OFFICE Spokane County, Washington DRAINAGE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of The Plat of Shelley Acres Addition, Spokane County Project No. PE-1773, (hereinafter referred to as the "Plat"), undersigned covenants and agrees that: Spokane County and its authorized agents are hereby granted the right to ingress and egress to, over and from all drainage easements for the purposes of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, ponds, ditches, culverts and other drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the property owner or the responsible parties. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect or maintain drainage facilities locateri outside of public rights-of-way, except in cases where Spokane County specifically assumes that responsibility in writing. Neither does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the property owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. The property owners within this plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow over and across their respective properties. If the property owners fail to maintain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or drainage facilities on private properties, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If not conected within the periad indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots or floodplain areas within private lots, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, including, but not limited to, inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage sball consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots shall be graded so that either a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage mtercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. All drainage facilities for this plat, including any `208' swales, sball be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Any proposed changes to the approved road and drainage plans must be approved by the Spokane County Engirieer's Off'ice prior to construction of said changes. There may exist properties located uphill and adjacent to this subdivision which periodically discharge stormwater runoff onto individual lots within this plat. Stormwater runoff from nearby uphill properties should be expected, and during snow melt periods or wet seasons the lots may be subjected to higher amounts of stormwater runoff that what is normally observed or anticipated. Because stormwater runoff from adjacent properties have discharged onto this plat prior to development, stormwater runoff will likely continue to do so after development. The property owners within this plat shall maintain all water quality swales ("208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on their respective properties, and any portion of a`208' swale situated in a public right- of-way adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified in the currently approved aad accepted plans on file at Spokane County's Engineer's Office. No structures, including fences, shall be constructed directly over or within a`208' swale without the expressed written consent of the Spokane County Engineer. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect andlor maintain the drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the lot owner(s) to properly maiotain such areas. Spokane County hereby accepts responsibility for maintaining the drywells located in Swales "A", "B", and "C". The owners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block l, and their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities, located in easement "D" in conformance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County's Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not limited to, keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drywells, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage facilities as needed, and maintaining live native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery andlor trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. @wners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1, and their successors in interest shall be equally responsible for payment of all claims and other liabilities which may become due for said maintenance responsibilities. The owner of Lot 6 of Block 1, and their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities, located in easement "E" in conformance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County's Engineer's Office. Maintenance of drainage facilities includes, but is not limited to, keeping open and cleaning storm pipes, ditches, drywells, drainage ponds, swales, etc., replacement of drainage facilities as needed, and maintaining live native-type dryland grasses or lawn turf in the `208' swales located in common areas or tracts, with optional shrubbery and/or trces, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the drainage swale as indicated by the approved plans. The owner of Lot 6 of Block 1, and their successors in interest shall be responsible for payment of all claims and other liabilities which may become due for said maintenance responsibilities. If the responsible parties, or their successors in interest, fail to maintain the drainage facilities in conformance with the accepted drainage plan on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office, a notice of such failure may be given to the responsible partie.s, or their successors in interest, by the County Engineer. If not corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the rigUt to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the responsible parties, or their successors in interest. This covenant and agreement shall run with the land in perpetuity, and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors and assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the drainage facilities as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this day of 2000. HARLEY MANZ GERALDINE MANZ State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane ) I certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Harley Manz and Geraldine Manz, husband and wife are the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be their free and voluntaty act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My Appointment Exp'ves: SHELLEY ACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE W.MA1N CORPORATION sy: lts: State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person aclalowledged that they signed this instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of W. Main Corporation as of the Shelley Acres Subdivision Joiat Venture to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My Appointment Expires: MARK McMANUS State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane ) 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Mark McManus is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that they signed this instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the Shelley Acres Subdivision Joint Venture to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. My Appointment Expires: Office of the County Engineer Spokane County, Washington 17 March 2000 To: Landmark Surveyors Willard Boatwright, P.L.S. From: Development Engineering Services Ed Parry, P.E. RE: P1773 - Shelly Acres Plat Dedication Please note: The Drainage Declaration of Covenant is to be signed by the Title Owner's. Please submit the signed Declaration of Covenant to the County Engineer's Office. The County will record the document. Please note that the County Assessor's Office has strict requirements on document size and margins. The Declaration of Covenant will need to adhere to these requirements. This includes, but is not limited to: a 3" margin at the top of the first page, a 1" margin at the top of all other pages, and 1" margins on the remaining three sides. An electronic copy of the Covenant is available upon request. Plat Dedication Drainage easements "A", "B", and "C", as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff from public rights-of-way, are hereby granted to Spokane County. Drainage easement "D", as platted and shown hereon, which is for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff from a portion of Courtney Lane, is hereby granted to the owners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1. Drainage easement "E", as platted and shown hereon, which is for the purposes of installing, operating and rnaintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff from a portion of Courtney Lane, is hereby granted to the owners of Lots 4, 5, and 6 of Block 1. All drainage easements, lots and tracts aze subject to the separate Drainage Declaration of Covenant as recorded under Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a part hereof. • ' it • . ' . . . • 1 . ~ . . . . . _ ' . . " ' . . . . . . . _ . . . . _ . ~ . . L - . . . . " _ ~1 , . . ~ . ~ . . ~ . . ~ . . . . COUNTY AUDITOR AUDITOR'S CERTIFICATE . ••:i ; • Filed for record this day of 2000 at M. in Book i• ~ of Plats at Page at the ~ requeat of . ~ _ , • ' • ~ . ' • ; . . , • l . • ~ . . ~ . . ~ . , q. . . • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused their namee to be affixed this day of 2000. • ~ .~•f. HARLEY MANZ GERALDINE MANZ . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • . • SHELLY ACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE . =L%.~.~.r . , : ~ K . ~•~t~~~~'~~~ ~ W.MAIN CORPORATION MARK McMANUS 1~ . ~ j 1 ~ bY Its ~ ~;+=e;fy-~4; ~ ~r,;t ;{':t • ~,r ~ "'L 1• R~~ • ~ • _I ~1~.~/ . • ~ • ~t - - ' • • ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF COUNTY OF j SS , ' .i • On this day personally appesred before me, NARLEY MANZ and GERAL- .•':.J DTNE MANZ, hueband and wife to me known to be individuals who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledqe ' `',r:.•° that they signed the seme as their free and voluntary act and . deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Gfven under -my hand and seal this day of , 2000. , ' Notary public in and for the State of , residing at . • , My Commission Expfres. . . F •-~i` . - ACKNOWLEDGMENT ' ~ • STATE OF • ',d.' :SS th _ COUNTY OF On this day 2000, pereonally appeared before me to me known to be the f of SHELLY ACRES SUBDIVI- - SION JOINT VENTURE that executed the within and forgoinq instru- • ment, and acknowledged the said inatrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed, for the uaes end purposea therein men- -'~'r - tioned, and on oath states that he/she is authorized to execute the said instrument. ~1 - Witness my hand and official seal affixed the day and year first •a " above written. . . ~ . . "j Notary public in and for the State . Of • ; Residing at . . ' . ~ - • ° . , . ~ - ~ My Commission Expires . . • t ~ . • i i' , . . - RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY MAR O 1 20 'hECEIVEa . . CURRENT PLANNIN* G DroWt 12000 . PE-1773-95 ~ , •t ! SPOKANE COUNTY ENGM I . . ,i ~ . LANDMARK SURVEYORS ~ . . . ' RECEIVED z•z~'-2o00 FEA 2 9 2000 . . ~ BOX 354, SPRAGUt. WASHINGTON 00032 ~ 8POME wim EN4INFcFA . . . . , ~ ' . . ; SBBBT 2 OF 2 ; , 1-800-024-3003 . , ~ . ; i ; . ' ' ~ . . . • -f . ~ - - . . . . . _ : _ . _w_. _ . . .._,~_.~.w:.~, , - ! , . . _ „ . ` ' s • • . . ~ 0 _ E-MO To: William W. Main, Jr. From: David A. Berto, L.S. Subject: Plan Review P1773 Shelley Acres . Date: March 2, 2000 Our office has received your Plat for review prior to accepting a final Plat. For this deparhnent to continue we need a$100.00 final submittal fees payable to the County Engineer. If this has been done I need a copy of a receipt or canceled check If you have any questions call me at 456-3600. Thank you for responding to this matter. cc john todd ~ , TRANSNATION TITLE INSUR.ANCE COMPANY NORTH 7 2 O ARGONNE SPOKIINE, W7ISHINGTON 99212 Prepared for : SPOKAN v E No.: SH-230638 LANDMARK SURVEYORS Z,? 200U Charge : $12 5. 0 0 ATTN: WILLARD BOATRIGHT Tax: $10.13 BOX 354 Total: $135.13 S P RAGUE , WA 9 9 0 3 2 _CURRENT PLANNlNG DMSION T H I R D P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E Certificate for filing Plat of : SHELLEY ACRES ADDITION - In tl-ie matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit: COMMENCING at the Southwest corner of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M.; thence North 0026134" East, 911.95 feet along the West line of said Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter to the True Point of Beginning of this description; thence North 0026134" East, 1067.97 feet; thence North 64014102" East, 368.57 feet; thence South 89015108" East, 337.11 feet; thence South 0029'59" West, 890.05 feet; thence South 6202613611 West, 721 . 90 feet; thence North 89033'26" West, 29.50 feet to the Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: GERALDINE MANZ, as her separate property, as to a portion and SHELLY ACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE. EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos. 45244.9133 and 45244.9141. Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. ~ Pa~m I 8f 3 \ . - Order No. SH-230638 2. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GR.ANTEE: The Washington Water Power Company, a corporation PURPOSE: Electrical distribution line and associated fixtures; with right to inspect line and to remove brush and trees AREA AFFECTED: East half of the Southeast Quarter DATED: June 25, 1945 RECORDED: July 3, 1945 RECORDING NO.: 658470A 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: T.D.C., Inc., a Corporation PURPOSE: Ingress and egress and utilities 60 feet in width AREA AFFECTED: This and other property RECORDED: November 7, 1977 RECORDING NO.: 7711070326 NOTE: This Easement is a correction of the Easement recorded April 16, 1976 under Recording No. 7604160332. 4. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: March 20, 1987 RECORDING NO.: 8703200315 REGARDING: Sewerage System 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Weston Ogzewalla and Rosemary Ogzewalla and their successors and assigns PURPOSE: Ingress and egress and for utilities over and across said property AREA AFFECTED: This and other property RECORDED: November 17, 1987 RECORDING NO.: 8711170213 6. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Vera Irrigation District No. 15 and Washington Water Power Company PURPOSE: Operate and repair water and natural gas lines AREA AFFECTED: Exact location not disclosed RECORDED: Octobr 21, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4047130 Page 2 of 3 . , -1 i. 1..1 ` . Order No. SH-230638 7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Vera Irrigation District No. 15 PURPOSE: Construct, erect, operate and maintain electric distribution facilities; Cut trim and chemically treat trees and shrubbery AREA laFFECTED: This and other property RECORDED: October 22, 1998 RECORDING NO.: 4283827 8. REAL ESTATE CONTRACT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: SELLER: Harley Manz and Geraldine Manz, husband and wife PURCHASER: Ben H. Simpson, a single person RECORDED: January 3, 1994 RECORDING NO.: 9401030633 EXCISE TAX RECEIPT NO.: 0094000190 PURCHASER'S INTEREST IS NOW HELD BX: SHELLY ACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE RECORDED: January 31, 2000 RECORDING NO.: 4452007 SELLER'S INTEREST IS NOW HELD BY: ASSIGNEE: Geraldine A. Manz PURSUANT TO SPOKANE COUNTY , CAUSE NO.: 00400242-6 TYPE OF PROCEEDINGS: Petition for Order Adjudicating Testacy and Heirship 9. Declaration of Covenant imposed by instrument recorded on March 10, 2000, under Recording No. 4462634. END OF EXCEPTIONS sc DATED AS OF February 11, 2000 at 8:00 a.m. TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY , t BY For service on this order call: (509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519 Sean Heath, Title Officer 9C Page 3 of 3 ~ F • ~ fi Afl.er Recording Retum io : Spatcane CiDunty Enginecr Attn: Engineering Administr2ttion l~ RESOLUr~ON NO. 2 0613 BEFOR.E THE BOARD OF COLTNTY COM1VIISSIONER5 DF SFOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON iIV THE NTAT`FER DF ESTABL~SHMENT ) -OF 12'n AVEIVLTE AND ST'EEN C0LIRT ) RES OLUT ION - COUNTY ENGINEER' S ROAD FILE NO. 2496 ) ~ STAS LIS H MENT Na Assessor's Tax Farcel Nwnber Assi~ed - Fublac Raadways 'I`his being the day set for the hearing on Spokane Cvunty Engineer's Report on che proposed establishment of 12' Avenue and Steen Court, proceedings far which were iniciated by Preliminary Resalution Na, 2-0511, and it appearing to the Soard on proof duly made that Noxice af Hearing was puhlished and posted in the muner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining the regort and maps af the Spokane County Engi.neer and all claims and papers on file and after hearxng aIl other evidence adduced at the hearing; and . IT FURTHER APPEARING that the rights of way have heen dedicated as public roads, 60 and 50 feet wide, and that sard raads are apublic necessity and the same should be apened and established as County road.s. xHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the. Board of County Camrnissioners of. Spokane Cotrnty> Washington, that the hereixiafter described roads as repurted by the Spokane County Engineer on the 18th day af June, 2002,being; more partieularl}r described as follows: 12~ AVEIVUE - 60 foot wide right of way, frvm the west -right of way line of Sharnrack S#reet ea.st to the east line of L,ot 9, Block 6(one foot strip) of Rotchford Acre Tracts. . STEEN ~OU"RT - 54 faot wtde right of way, frQm the west line of Shelly Acres Addition easterly and north to and including cul-de-sac. I.ocated in the Southeast Quarter (SE a) of Section 24, Townshfp 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M. and as shown by the records and maps on ~'~le in the Off'ice of the 5pokane Caunty Engineer be and the same her~by are established as County toads and the same shall be lcnawn as 12' Avenue a.nd S#een Court, Road File Na. 2496. The road supervisor af the road distriet in which the said roads are located s . . • SHELLEY ACRES ADDITION CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Date: 21-1un-99 Prepared by Metro Engineering, Inc. By: JKO Project No. 97-035 Checked: JGL UNIT ESTIMATED ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTI UNITS COST . SANITARY SEWER 1 8" PVC SDR 35 irtd. trench exc. 914 LF $20.00 $18,280.00 2 Manhole Type III-48 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 3 Manhole Type 1-48 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 4 Side Sewer pipe 4" d'ra. 612 LF $20.00 $12,240.00 5 4" Side Sewer C.O. 3 EA $100.00 $300.00 Sub-Tatal $38,320.00 WATER LINE 6 Backfill & ComRact Ex Watierline (approx 3' aepth) 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 7 Water Service 2 EA $200.00 $400.00 8 Valve Box on EAssting Watsrtine Vahres 4 EA a125.00 $500.00 9 8" C900 Class 150 PVC incl. trench exc. 233 LF $18.00 $4,194.00 10 8" FL x MJ AdapOef 2 EA $100.00 $200.00 11 8" FL x FL x FL Tee 1 EA $350.00 $360.00 12 S" FL x MJ Gabe Valve 1 EA $700.00 $700.00 13 8"MJ x 8"MJ x 6"FL Tee 1 EA $350.00 $360.00 14 8" MJ Plug 1 EA $100.00 $100.00 15 5' FL Vera Sfandard Fire Hydrant Assembly 1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00 16 Thnist Block 4 EA a100.00 $400.00 Sub-Total $11,194.00 STREET AND DRAINAGE 17 Clearing 8 Grubbing 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000•00 18 Erosion 8 Sedimettt CorYtr+ol 1 LS $1,000.00 $1,000.00 19 Excavation, Irx;luding Haui (See Nabe 1) 1,561 CY $5.00 $7,755.00 20 Embankrrwtt (See Nate 1) 1,460 CY $2.00 $2,920.00 21 Subgrade Preparation 6,576 SY $1.00 $6,576.00 22 Type "R" Concnebe Curb & Gutter 2,018 LF 37.00 $14,126.00 23 Concebe Curb InWts (See Nobe 2) 7 EA $75.00 a525.00 ' 24 Asphatt Paving - 2" A.C. on 8" rock (12th Ave.) 1,175 SY $10.00 $11,750.00 ' 25 AspFtalt Paving - 2" A.C. on 8" rock (Sbaen CL) 3,915 SY $10.00 $39,150.00 26 Asphatt Paving - 7' A.C. on 6" rock (Courbisy) 1,486 SY $9.00 $13,374.00 27 Type "A" D ryvNell 2 EA $1, 750.00 $3,500.00 28 Type "WDryw+eU 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 29 W.S.D.O.T. Grabe Inlet Type 2 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 30 8" CPEP, ADS N-12 Corrugated Pipe 58 LF $18.00 $1,044-00 31 Rip-Rap Pad 1 EA $300.00 $300.00 32 "208" Svvale Construction (5 swales) 236 CY $10.00 $2,360.00 33 Off-Site Interception Ditch 1,555 LF $2.00 $3,110.00 !34 Turf Reinforcement Matting 347 SY $5.00 $1,735.00 ; 35 Hydroseeding 38,500 SF $0.07 $2,502.50 ' 36 Street Name Sign 2 EA $200.00 $400.00 Sub-Total $120,627.50 ~ ~ GRAND TOTAL (ESTIMATE) s170,141.50 Notes: 1) Courtney Lane only, Steen Court assumed bo be rough graded. Quantities do not include kot grading. 2) The quantities and estimate are not guaranteed to be accuratie and are fumished without any liability , on the part of the ERgiReer. I ~ METRO ENGIIVEE.RING, INC. S. 324 Sherman LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 624-9351 Fax: (509) 624-8153 TO: Date: 11/04/99 Job No: 97-035 Spokane County Engineers Attention: Ed Parry, P.E. Re: Shelley Acres Addition 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 WE ARE SENDING YOU: x Attached Under separate cover via the follo ' ~tftD Shop Drawings Prints Plans Samples Copy of Letter Change Order Specifications Mylar N o v o~~~q9 r SPOKANE COUN7Y ENGINEER , Copies Date ~ No. ~ Description 1 1 Street and 1'~rainage Plans (Original Vellums) 1 1 Street and Drainage Plans (Mylar) THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: X For approval Approved as submitted Resubmit copies for approval For your use Approved as noted Submit copies for distribution X As requested Retumed for correction Retum corrected prints For review and comment For bids due Prints returned after loan to us COMMENTS: Ed- Your acceptance of the attached plans is requested. Please let me know when you have stamped the vellums so we can pick them up for our records. F. S. - Co&4td we atso 9e-k o,e Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you! I-Ae : 4 "'~"~►-o h ~ S' / COPY TO: Bill Main, Jr.; Main Corporation SIGNED: , L Joel e, P.E~ 7 ~ - • ' ' • . METR4 ENGIIVEERIN-G, INC. . . Civil Engineering and Project Management Services June 2211999 . . . . , RECE1VED , Spokane Lounty Engineering Department : JUN,2 21999 102E W. Broadway " ' . Spokane, WA 99260 5~~~ t~oUPd'e r,~rWER - ATTEN'I'[ON: Bill Hemmiags, P.E. - , . ItE: S6elley Acres Addition . , . . . - Dear Bill: - , - Attached, plea.se find our estimate for the above referenced project. We are subnutting ' this per your request. It is nty understanding that by doing so, it will speed the acceptance , process. + _ Please call me if you have any questions or comments.,. -Sincerely, Metro En neering, InG oel G.1.ee, . E. ' Principal Engineer . , cc: 6i11 Main, Jr.; l'viain Corporation . - . , . I . , - . ~ . . ~ . + . S. 324 S.herrnan St. Spokane, Washivsgton 99202 Ph.: 509-¢24-9351 Fax: 509-624-8I53 . . ~ Page 1 of 2 i Wayne McGavran From: John Hohman Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:53 AM To: Wayne McGavran; Alysa Wiyrick Cc: Henry Allen Subject: RE: Recommendations for PE-1750-C and PE-1773 Ok to both. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Wayne McGavran Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:02 AM To: Alysa Wiyrick Cc: John Hohman; Henry Allen Subject: Recommendations for PE-1750-C and PE-1773 Alysa, • Listed below are updated reports for two projects shown on the surety inspection spreadsheet. PE-1570-C Autumn Crest 4th Addition I visited this site on 3/29/06 and found no areas of concern. This project was constructed in 1994. A Letter of Credit was in the files in the amount of $15,700.00 with Washington Mutual Bank. No release was found. Placed call to bank and was told that file was too old and would have been purged from system. Therefore, it would be safe to assume LOC was released. If not, l'm sure someone would have heard from Landreth Construction. Recommenda.tion: Consider this project closed with no further action required. ~ I visited this site on 3/29/06 and found no areas of concern. This project was constructed in 2000. A Warranty Bond was in the files in the amount of $32,820.00 with Bank of Fairfield. No release was found in the file, but two letters were in the file dealing with reducing the original bond amount to $21,880.00 and then releasing the $21,880.00 in full. This letter sta.tes that a replacement warranty security replaced the need for a performance surety. However, nothing was found in the files concerning this latest warranty surety. There was a post-it stating 4/5/2006 Page 2 of 2 "warranty bond already taken out. Disregard this letter". It was initialed RS. Called bank and tlze savings certificate for this bond was released. 1 requested bank fax copy of release letter for our files. Recommendation: Consider this project closed with no further action required. Please let me know if you need more information. Wayne McGavran 4/5/2006 ~ 04-04-06;10;22AM; ;15093267277 # 1/ 3 ■ i i ■ ' . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 201 W North River Dr, Ste 305 Spokane WA 99201 Phone: (509) 328-6000 ext 226 % • ~ - ^ ~ Fax: (509) 326^7277 tloney@bankof fairfield.com rax f'r_)CC_jU j')Zj r,, Frvm: Tammy Loney F~= Pages: ZS . a ~s Phone: Dato: 4 - '~t -0 (p Re; CC: ~ O Vrgent O For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle Comments: - c~J . OL . ~ . ~ rnlls~ . . ~ . * CONFIDENTIlaL - Thls fax contains confidentfal, priviieged Information intended only forthe addressee. Do not read, copy, or dlsseminate it unless you are the addressee. If you have received thls communlcatlon ln error, please call us (corled) at the number above, and mali the oRginal message via U.S. Postal Service to us at the above address. 04-04-06;10;22AM; • ;15093267277 # 2/ 3 VV/ CJV/ LUUO 1V. iL 1:.1V~.GGlJ~GUt r~~ v1 r~~♦~~.✓ .-.v- ar~ ~ ii S p O K A I~ ~ , C O LT N T Y, DMSiON OE ENCM66KINC iwD ROA05 /1 T1tv1SION oF THE PV.ALIC WORtCS DEPARTMEM ' Febniary l9, 2002 Aan-k of Fairfield PO Box 189 Spangle, WA 99031 . ' RE: Sa,vings Certificate # 28779 fox XZesidemial Constxuction of Shelley l1.c,r,es. (P1773) , . , Dcar Sir ox Madam ~ Plcase be advised that tbe Savingv Cer6ficate # 28779 dated May 4, 2000 issued by yvur cv.rr~ any for 5helley Acre9 S roads and associated drauAgubdivasion Jox~t Ventur~ as.~LY-~o .z-~a~latioz~s o~ p ' e facil~plat m the re , cuccEnt acnount of ~21,SS0►00 ~nna ities-foxAq.A-bovr6-.mentioned- ow })e~releas d in ~11 ef~ecCive i,cntzaediatcly. 1~ ~ replacement waxxanry secuority is secu ty' '~his final releasE should close out the above referenced Surety tf you have any questi~ons, Paease call me at (509) 477-3600. Sincexely, ' Joho Hohwan, P)E ' 1~ Development Scrnces Eng~r,eer/~e cc: Sbelley Actcs Subdivision Joint Ventuto ~ File 1026 W. IIroildwny Aive. • Spokane, WA 992Wa170 ~(509) 4T/4'600 FNC; (509) 477-7655 (?s+d Floor) 477-7479 (3rc1 Floor) ~ TDD: (509) 477-7133 04-04-06;10:22AM; ;15093267277 # 3/ 3 v-i v-i s.vvv v. A. ~..1 v.0 A uv~i~.& vt "y~~l &►..i..u r►.VG vJ I I I S ~ O K. A N E ~ O V N T X • V1'ILT'TIF9 glvtsyoN A DMSION OF THE PLJDLTG WOX!LS OnPAItTMENT N. Bxuce itlwln, P,Fi., UtgiNee DaTecoc+x I January 15, 2003 Saaelley A,cros .Yolnt Ve.nture Atm: Mark McMantis 921 S Monroe, #5 • Spokane, WA. 99204 ' Re: SheUcy ,A.c,r.es Dry Sewex Sysfem Dear Mr. McManus: . Tha9 is io uotify you that the Shelley Acres Dry 5ewer Systeru has satisfactoxily completcd the construction wan'mty period. Xour secuziry (Baak of Fairfield Savings Assignment #28780, dated May 4, 2000, in tlie anaount o:f $8,000.00) is be,reby authorized to be released in its entirety. I:f you havc any qucstions concerning this matter, please contact Crene Repp at 477-3604. Sinccrcly, ~ ~ . . Kevin R. Cooke, P.E. . Setiver Planning arad Design, Mana.ger 3 ~1,o cc: F3a1a]c of Faufield Altn: Bob Joxgenaen Ve,r,za ,Tarvis . / 1026 w. »madway • Spokane, wA 99760-0430, •(509) 477-3604 PnX: (509) 477-4715 'i'DD: (509) 977-7131 Page 1 of 2 ~ y Wayne McGavran From: Wayne McGavran Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:02 AM To: Alysa Wiyrick Cc: John Hohman; Henry Allen Subject: Recommendations for PE-1750-C and PE-1773 Alysa, Listed below are updated reports for two projects shown on the surety inspection spreadsheet. PE-1570-C Autuma Crest 4th Addition I visited this site on 3/29/06 and found no areas of concern. This project was constructed in 1994. A Letter of Credit was in the files in the amount of $15,700.00 with Washington Mutual Bank. No release was fou.nd. Placed call to bank and was told that file was too old and would have been purged from system. Therefore, it would be safe to assume LOC was released. If not, I'm sure someone would have heard from Landreth Construction. Recommendation: Consider this project closed with no fiu-ther action required. I visited this site on 3/29/06 and found no areas of concern. This project was constructed in 2000. A Warranty Bond was in the files in the amount of $32,820.00 with Bank of Fairfield. No release was found in the file, but two letters were in the file dealing with reducing the original bond amount to $21,880.00 and then releasing the $21,880.00 in full. This letter states that a replacement warranty security replaced the need for a performance surety. However, nothing was found in the files concerning this latest warranty swety. There was a post-it stating "warranty bond already taken out. Disregard this letter". It was initialed RS. Called bank and the savings certificate for this bond was released. I requested bank fax copy of release letter for our files. Recommendation: Consider this project closed with no further action required. Please let me know if you need more information. 4/3/2006 Page 2 of 2 ~ - ' Wayne McGavran 4/3/2006 . . ~ - ( ' S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERIING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT February 19, 2002 Bank of Fairfield PO Box 189 Spangle, WA 99031 RE: Savi.ngs Certificate # 28779 for Residential Construction of Shelley Acres. (P1773) Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised that the Savings Certificate # 28779 dated May 4, 2000 issued by your company for Shelley Acres Subdivision Joint Venture as surety for installations of roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat in the remaining current amount of $21,880.00 may now be released in full effective immediately. A replacement warranty security is sectued replacing the need for a performance surety. This final release should close out the above referenced Surety. If you have any questions, please call me at (509) 477-3600. Sincerely, John Hohman, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: Shelley Acres Subdivision Joint Venture File i 1 ~ ~ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 ~(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 33 ~ ~ S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVTSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 21, 2000 Mr. Bob Jorgensen Bank of Fairfield P.O. Box 189 Spangle, WA 99031 . Re: Reduction of Construction Performance Surety Savings Certificate No. 28779 Spokane County Project #P 1773 - Shelley Acres ~ Dear Mr. Jorgensen: The County is starting the process to establish the roads constructed in this project. This Savings Certificate may now be reduced from the original amount of $218,800.00 to $21,880.00 (Twenty Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty and NO/100 USDollars. If you liave any questions, feel free to call our offce at 477-3600. Sincerely, William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer ~ - William H. Hemmings, P.E. Development Services Engineer/Manager 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 rAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 ('ird Floor) • TDD: (5(19) 477-713.1 7 ASSIGNMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY BOND For security purposes only, SHELLY ACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE , hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number 28779 . in the face amount of $32,820.00 (Thirty two tliausund eigfit I:undred twenty dollars and N01100 US Dollars) and held in and by Bnnk Nome BANK OF FAIRFIELD , SPANCLE Branch . For improvements related to: COUNTY PROJECT # P1773 PROJECT NAME: Sliellev Acres ("Project") Sald ASSIGNMENT FOR WARRANTY 130ND PURI'OSES is made as security for the full and faithful performance by the Developer of a guarantee against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during a period of one (1) year after the County's establishment of the improvements constructed under this project as public facilities. The County Engineer may request payment from the Bank for the purposes of remedy of such defects in materials and workmanship become apparent during the warranty period, by providing documentation to the Bank. The County Engineer's documentation shall indicate that the work done contains defects in materials or workmanship in the construcrion of the improvements for the Project and therefore the purposes of said savings assignment have not been fully and faithfully performed as required. The County Engineer's documentation shall also include a statement of the amount of money that the County deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon the Bank's receipt of such written documentation, the Developer hereby authorizes the Bank to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested, up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. The County Engineer shall provide a copy of all such documentation and correspondence with the Bank to the Developer at the address noted below. BANK: BANK OF FAIRFIELD . ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 189 . CITY, STATE, ZIP : SPANGLE, WA 99031 . PHONE: (509) 245-3226 . AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: BOB JORGENSEN . . TITLE: assistant vice president . PRINCIPAL: SHELL Y A CRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE . WILLIAM W. MAIIV 1 V . MARX O. McMANUS . ADDRESS: E. 12810 NORA SPOKANE, WA 99216 . ' AHONE: . (509) 922-3000 . DATED this 27 day of DECEMBER , 200 0. ' PRINCIPAL: She!!y Acres Subdivision Joint Venture Developer: A Washington Partnership s ~ * By: (typed name)Mark d! NFeManus, General Partner Wr1[iarrr W. Main #'V, General Partner State of Washingtan } ~ss County af Spokane ~ Icertify that I know ar have satisfactory evidence t'hat MARKO, McMA1VUS and WILLI}111rI W. MAI1V lV are said persons u+ho appeared befvre me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrutrlent, on oath stated that they v►+ere authorized to execute the instrurnent and acknowledged it as the General Partners of S#telfu Acres Subdivision Jornt Vertture to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses aPurposes mentiorred in the instrument. ~ Dated 1 2f27104 i „ N~ot~y Aaablic in and Ij ro • ff]C the Stc`lte 0f W3Sh1T1 011 • - -4 f r My APl3o1TltiTleC1t E7ip1TES: ~NDHA K. WALLER IV~~~~Y PUBLlC SfiATE OF WASHINCTON COMMfSS1#M'■ 4 ~~PI■ ■ES LAL.Ks O'RF 1O~EFt 19, 2-002 , Eank af Fairf e[d, Sparrg#e Brarach (Bank Name) X(typed Cc~rpc~ration e) Bob ,forgensen Tts: (Title) Assistanf Vtce Prestdent State of Washingtnn ) - )ss County of Spakane ) Z certify that 1 knvw vr have satisfactor~ evidence that BOB JORCElVSEN is the persan who appeared before rne, and said persan acknawledged that he signed this instrument, an aath stated khat he was authnrizeci to execate the instrurnent and acknowledged it as the crssisirrnt vice president of BANK DF FAIRFIELD to be the free and voluntary act of such party far the uses and purposes rrtentioned in the instrument. Dated 12127100 $s".~i~Ta Public in and for the Staze 4f Washington. A?~ ~ '%-~OT~~j- 01 ~ My Appointtnent Expires: _ • ~ ~ ~i ~ ~;A. ~~Blk+ ;O ~ ; * ~ • ~ 0i , z fy { I ~ . b ~ . ~ Parry, Ed i From: Hemmings, Bill Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 8:43 AM To: Stronks, Randy; Parry, Ed . Cc: Johns, Bill Subject: FW: Shelly Acres Addition Ed Please get warranty bond and have Randy start the establishment once the bond is in place. Thanks Bill Original Message From: Lennemann, Paul Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 7:39 AM To: Hemmings, Bill Subject: Shelly Acress Addition All items of construction on this plat have been completed and verified. Please contact Mark McManus (9240968) to coordinate the warranty bond. D - f "I Z ~ 060 6"7 AU4.Ad ~ ~%v~. ~~~►~i ~ ~ ~ / , ^ - . Parry, Ed From: Parry, Ed . Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 9:12 AM To: 'zmcmanus@aol.com' Subject: P1773 - Sheiley Acres; Warranty Bond - Savings Assignment Mark: Here's the form we talked about this morning. It is in Word 6.0/95 format. Please fill in the blanks and adjust the notary statements as appropriate. Please note that the Developer and the Bank should both notarize their signatures. Please call me at 477-3600 if there are any problems opening the attachment. When the Commissioners have passed a resolution to establish the roads, we will be abte to release the remainder of the construction bond. Thanks Ed Pa Warranty Bond - Savings Assign.. 1 r ~ - ASSIGNMENT FOlt CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY BOND For security purposes only, ,("Developer") hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number • in the face amount of $10,940.00 (Ten T6ousand lYine Hundred Forty and NO/100 USDollars) and held in and by • • san6 xamc Bank of • Branch (the "Bank") - For improvements related to: COUNTY PROJECT # P1773 PROJECT NAME: Shellev Acres ("Project") Said asSIGNMEtvT Fo[t wAtRAtvTV BoxD puttPOSEs is made as secwity for the full and faithful performance by the Developer of a guarantee against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during a period of one (1) year after the County's establishment of the improvements constructed under this project as public facilities. The County Engineer may request payment from the Bank for the purposes of remedy of such defects in materials and workmanship become apparent dwing the warranty period, by providing documentation to the Bank. The County Engineer's documentation shall indicate that the work done contains defects in materials or workmanship in the construction of the improvements for the Project and therefore the purposes of said savings assignment have not been fully and faithfully performed as required. The County Engineer's documentation shall also include a statement of the amount of money that the County deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon the Bank's receipt of such wrirten documentation, the Developer hereby authorizes the Bank to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested, up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. The County Engineer shall provide a copy of all such documentation and correspondence with the Bank to the Developer at the address noted below. BANK: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE: PRESIDENT: SECRETARY: DEVELOPER ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZTP: PHONE: DATED this day of , 200 ~ State of ~ ) )ss County ofl , ) ~ I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the erson wfio appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that ~ signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of My Appointment Expires: ~ I A Corporation By: its:; , State of ) )ss County of ) I certify that I irnow or have satisfactory evidence that ~ iai erson who appeared before me, and said person aclrnowledged tl~at ' si ed this instrument, on oath stated that was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ofl ~ to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated Notary Public in and for the State of I. . My Appointment Expires: J0 j 1 I ! S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer .YUly 20, 2000 Mr. Bob Jorgensen Bank of Fairfield PO Box 189 Spangle, WA 99031 RE: Shelley Acres Addition (P 1773) Savings Certificate Number 28779 Dear Bob: We have received a request to reduce the above referenced savings certificate to reflect the current status of construction. Although Spokane County is under no obligation to .reduce any savings certificate it holds, we have elected to allow a reduction of this savings certificate from t6e original'amount of $ 218,800.00 to $ 99,400.00. Consideration of any further reductions to this savings certif cate will likely be based on continuous construction progress toward completion and acceptance of the public roads. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, v Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager 1026 W. Sroadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 9 (509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd F1oor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 . ~ 07/11/2000 23:06 9268438 MARK MCMANUS - - PAGE 61 To: Scott Enge art 12 - Oc> Spokaae C umty Engineers , Fax:477 703 . Reference: She Acres ,Addition (PE 1773-95) . ~ We have mpleted curb, sub grade prep for road, site evacuarion including road y cut and fill, and items required to acconnplish the above , (Shelly Acres A dition) ot~ 12" and Steen Ct. We have rough cut Courtney Lane. It would appreciated if you would send us a bond reduction. 4ur bond is by CD d reductiom will allow us to pay our contractor. Your quick response will be appreciated. . . . Thank You, . ~ - Mark McMauus - General Partner Shelly. Acres Subdivision -7 ~ ~ ?e~ ► . / . , , ~ . , , . . ~ ~ ~ BOND ESTIMATE PROJECT P1773 - Steen Court by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 13-Ju1-00 DRAINAGE ITEMS N~ UNITS a QUANTITY • PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1.00 1200.00 1200.00 V070 y0d 2) Drywell - Type B EA 3.00 1700.00 5100.00, l1070 ► Q►l0 3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00 4) C3rate Type 2 EA 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 4.00 300.00 1200.00 1 DQ 6) Backrill For DW CY 150.00 17.25 2587.50 ! vo 7) Drainage Structures, instelled Plan callout EA Plan callout EA n Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 800.00 0'do 7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type 1 EA 0.00 0.00 7b) WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA 0.40 1300.00 0.00 8) CPEP Pipe 1(" Dia. LF 0.00 9) ADS n-12 Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00 18.00 0.00 9a) CMP Pipe 12" Die. LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10) CPEP Pipe 15' Dia. (ADS n-12) LF 0.00 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 559.81 12.00 6717.67 }p~ 15) Sod SF 5307.00 0.70 3714.90 1 at> 16) Rlpap outfall pad LS 1.00 500.00 500.00 NON STANDARD ORAINAGE ITEMS 1) Wilbert Vautt Curb Inlet EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 ~ 2) Erosion Protection • silt fence LS 1.00 1000.00 1000.00~!~GO 3) Eroslon Proteclion - Rock entry lS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00 lap 4) Type 1 curb cut inlet EA 9.00 200.00 1800.00 ipo 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 25820.07 16) Nbnuments EA 4.00 185.00 ~ 740.00 17) Bamcade LF 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 1.00 90.00 90.00 - - OTHER SUBTOTAL 830.00 - - GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 6705.05 10.00 67050.48 10~O b~S 20) Top Gourse CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Course CY 1332.12 15.50 20647.91 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 449.59 46.00 20681.22 23) Curb TYPB A LF 7.50 0.00 lDo 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 2678.90 8.50 22770.65 20 26) Sfdewalk SQ YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) ___~w~ . 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 - - - - GRADING AND SURFACING 131150.26 $157,800.33 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $173,580.36 use $173,600.00 1980 standards lnspection $0.00 use $0.00 . . . f BOND ES7IMATE r~ PROJECT P1773 - Courtney Lane by Ed Parry, P.Er~ DATE 13-Ju1-00 DRAINAGE fTEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1.00 1200.00 1200.00100 2) Drywell - Type B EA 1700.00 0.00 3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 1.00 300.00 300.00 100 6) BaCkfill For DW CY 40.00 17.25 690.00 100 7) Drainage Structures, installed Plan callout EA Plan callout EA Plan callout EA Plan callout EA Plan callout EA 7a) Cancrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 800.00 0.00 7b) Concrete Inlet Box, Type 2 EA 800.00 0.00 8a) Curb Inlet Type 1(Detail B-8) EA 0 00 150.00 0.00 8b) Sldewalk Inlet, Type 2(Detail B-9, WilbeR vautt) EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 8c) WSDOT Inlet Box 8 Grate EA 1.00 1300.00 1300.00 100 8) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00 9) ADS n-12 Pipe 8" Dia. LF 54.00 12.00 648.00 r~ 9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10) CMP 24" Oia. LF 0.00 38.00 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Oia l.F 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 12.00 0.00 15) Seed SF 1010 00 0.03 30.30 16) Ripap outfall pad CY 0.00 50.00 0.00 NON STANDARD ORAINAGE ITEMS 1) Wilbert Vault Curb Intei (detail B-9) EA 250.00 0.00 2) Erosion Protection LS 1.00 1500.00 1500.00160 3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000 UO (oo 4) Type 1 inlet pad EA 1.00 200.00 200.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 ORAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7868.30 16) Monuments EA 2.00 185.00 370.00 ~00 17) Barricade LF 0.00 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 1.00 90.00 90.Q0 (00 - - - - OTHER SUBTOTAL 460.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 2380.37 10 00 23803.70,f6e SO 70 20) Top Course CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Course CY 247.30 15.50 3833.09 /00 22) Asphalt Goncrete Tons 111.28 46.00 5119.03 r~0 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 0.00 8.50 0.00 26) Sidewalk SO YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS r 1) Cross-gutters SQ YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 32755.83 $41,084.13 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $45,192.54 use $45,200.00 1980 standards lnspection $0.00 use $0.00 9 0 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: BILL HEMMINGS FROM: DAVE BERTO DATE: May 9, 2000 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS P1773 SHELLEY ACRES The bond for the above mentioned project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans. RECEiVED MAY 0 V% 2000 SAV.INGS ASSIGNMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION SPOKANE C4UNTY ENGINEER For security purposes only, Developer, as "PRLNciPat,", hercby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number 28779 in the facc amount of US Currency $218,800 Two Hundred Eighteen Thousand Eigbt Hundred and N01100 Dollars Bank of Fairf%e~d, le , r.anch and held in and by _(insert Bank name. an...,. ranc. ~~~1vx ~ ttemtzed as follows: Steen Court US Currency $173,600 One Hundrecl Seventy-Three Thoasand Siac Hundred and NO/100 Dollars Courtney Laae US Currency $45,200 Forty-Five Thousand 'I`wo Hundred and NO/100 Dollars This Assignment is made as security for the full and faithful performance by the PRINCIPAL of tlie construction of certain roads, monumenls and drainage facilities for P1773 - Shelley Acres (the "Project"), as specificd in the typical section and roadway improvements specifications for said project, accepted November 5, 1999 on filc in ttie Officc of the Spokane County Engincer. Said work is to be complcted, a.nd the work is to be accepted by the County Engineer, no later than two years &om the date of plan acceptancc. Failure by the PRINCIPAL to obtain the County Engineer's acceptance of the work by the expiration date of the plan aoceptance shall consiitute a material breach, and shall be grounds for immediatc demand by the Spokane County Engincer for full payment of the entire amount of this Assignmcnt. The proceeds of this Assignmcnt shall be uscd by the County Engineer to complete the reuiaining work. Any surplus shall bc refundod to the PRINCIPAL upon the County Engineer's acceptance of the completed work. The PRINCIPAL shall reimburse the County EnginEer's Office for any costs in excess of the amount of the total amount of the financial guarantEe incurred by the County, including but not linuted to construction, inspection, administration, collection agency fees, and legal ex-penses incurred in securing the financial guarantoe and complcring the work. Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain the properiy of the PRINCIPAL. Thc funds encumbered by this Assignment are to be releasEd to thc PRINCIPAL or other duly designated party only with the prior written consent and agreemcnt of the SpokanE County Engineer. PROVIDED, FURTHER, the undersigned PRINCIPAL does hercby authorizc the Bank to pay over to the Spokane County Engiacer all or a sufficient portion of the monies in the savings certificate rcferenced hercinabove, upon written documentation bEing received from the Spokanc County Engineer indicating that the purposes for which the savings certificate was assigncd have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer deems ne.cessary to eomplete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, the PRINCIPAL hereby authorizes the Bank to release to the Spokane County Enginecr that amount of money requested up to the maxiinum amount in the savings certificate. DATED this 4th day of May 2000 BANK : Bank of Fairf ield ADDRESS : P 0 Box 189 CITY, STATE, ZIP : Spangle, WA 99031-0189 , 4p PHONE : 509-245-3226 • AUTHORIZED Bob Jorgensen REPRESENTATIVE : . TITLE : Assistant Vice President v~NTuil.~ SHECGY l9G/ZeS' suISA/C//SianJ 7D/N7- C~~ yrf PRINCIPAL : Gvl CL~A ~ s L✓ . M,¢X'iv 5r l,57 i~~i.~'/l~,~'j/ ADDRESS : &MY i I' ~ CITY, STATE, ZIP :_'F_ Z'qd/ O'VD 2/9 PHONE : _!5~067l~f~/V416 q0? a-3 oc~ c~ PRINCIPAL: Shelly Acres Subdivision Joint Venture Dcvclopcr A Wa~n 00 ~ _ By: (typedName) M k 0. McManus, General Partners Its: (Title) Wi liam W. Main IV, General Partners State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane ) W b&orPWand I certify that I know or have sarisfactory evidence that (nam~c~irin~.r~on)Ms ~Iie person waho hW& said person acknowledged that (htMo signed this instnuncnt,~on oath stated that (h01R~ was ~~te .~ec~r e s c~e MUNWIRo t~ie ipotru~eQlt anc~clctuwedged -it as the lt~i~~ah~.~t&icer. trustec, etc.l of (name o pa onm ~ ri~umF~ w~s executod) to be the frce and voluntary act of such parly for the uscs and purposcs mentioned in the insow1!/it May 4, 2000 ~~n~•~,'~4~~~i~ Dated te; *W° fi,qVP 9~ i ° . Notary Public in and puBLtC :2 ~ for the State of Washington. My Appointment Erpires: March 1, 2004 I' ~ htftw BANK: 7/~//111111a Bank of Fairf ield, Spangle Branch (Bank Name) poration A W s ' 7)' By: (typed Bo b Jorgensen ~ Its: (Title)Assistant Vice President State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidenc;e that ~name oi ~~on ~e person who appearod before me, and said person acknowledgod that (hekft signed this instrument, on oath statcd that (he*ft) was authorized to 1 ♦ ~ execute the instrument and ac~owledgcd it as the (tvvc o~' au$ioriYv e~.Po~icc d~ ustee, ctc.) of ( namne o~narty ou 17&W tg 4om instrument was executed) to be the free a.nd voluntary act of such party for the uscs and purposes mentioned in the inst```n Dated May 4, 2000 ``~~,Q,~G- AI oM . ~Y i ♦ P ~ ~~~`~s8 ~ A&~~ ~?~Da ~ Q: ~h e ' i , ~ v NOTARy WO; sma Notary Public in and for the State of Washington. i~►'. pIUBLIC : p2~ M y A p pointment Expires: March 1, 2004 ii'9j''• ~ T~' wAS; ~%%N /llltt1 i . . .r P1773 - Shelley Acres Bond Summary Steen Court construction $173,600.00 inspection $0.00 Courtney Lane construction $45,200.00 inspection $0.00 total $218,800.00 Note: 1980 standards, so County inspects ~ BOND EST[MATE PROJECT P1773 - Steen Court by Ed Pany, P.E. DATE 03-Nov-99 ORAINAGE ITEMS UNffS QUANTfTY PRICE COST 1) Orywell - Type A EA 1.00 1200.00 1200.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 3.00 1700.00 5100.00 3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 4.00 300.00 1200.00 6) BacM'iJl For DW CY 150.00 17.25 2587.50 7) Orainage Sbvctures, installed Plan callout EA Pian callout EA 7) Concrete Intet Box, Type I EA 800.00 0.00 7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type 1 EA 0.00 0.00 7b) WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA 0.00 1300.00 0.00 8) CPEP Pipe 10" Oia. LF 0.00 9) ADS n-12 Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00 18.00 0.00 9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10) CPEP Pipe 15" Dia. (ADS n-12) LF 0.00 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Exaavabon CY 558.81 12.00 8717.67 15) Sod SF 5307.00 0.70 3714.90 16) Ripap outfall pad LS 1.00 500.00 500.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ffEMS 1) Wilbert Vautt Curb Iniei EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 2) Erosion Protectian - sllt fence LS 1.00 1000.00 1000.00 3) Erosion Protecbon - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00 A) Type 1 curb Cut inlet EA 9.00 200.00 1800.00 5) 0.00 g) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 25820.07 16) MonumeMs EA 4.00 185.00 740.00 17) Bamcade LF 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 1.00 90.00 90.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 630.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 6705.05 10.00 67050.48 20) Top Course CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Coutse CY 1332.12 15.50 20847.91 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 449.59 46.00 20881.22 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 2678.90 8.50 22770.65 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 NON-STAIdOARD ROAD ItEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADiNG AND SURFAC(NG 131150.28 $157,800.33 CONSTRltCT10N TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 S173,580.36 use $173,600.00 1980 standards frrspection $0.00 use $0.00 . • Steen Cowt Quantitlea Grading Swales tap ftoor avg depth Volume Pond A 2875.00 1800.00 2.00 4675.00 Pond B 2500.00 936.00 2.00 3436.00 Pond C 3584.00 1886.00 1.00 2735.00 Pond D 2730.00 685.00 2.50 4268.75 15114.75 cubic ft 559.81 cubic yards L W T Roadside 300.00 30.00 2.00 9000.00 333.33 CY sodlseed 5307.00 sf sod 589.67 sy stop staR width Road 1206.00 0.00 37.00 Steen Court 1206.00 44622.00 sf tangerrt depth earthwork 3.50 156177.00 cf 6117.67 cy base 8.00 0.67 28748.00 cf 1101.78 cy acp 2.00 0.17 7437.00 cf 371.85 tons sum Cui-de-sac area ex 6705.05 depth 9329.00 sf base 1332.12 earthwork 1.70 15859.30 cf 587.38 cy acp 449.59 base • 8.00 0.67 6219.33 cf 234.35 cy acp 2.00 0.17 1554.83 cf 77.74 tons curb length Type R # sides tangent 1206.00 2.00 2412.00 returns 18.45 2.00 36.90 Cul-de-sac 230.00 230.00 tatal 2678.90 sidewalk tangent 0.00 1980 standards retum 0.00 cul-de-sac 0.00 0.00 0.00 sf 0.00 sy inspection 12.06 stations 500.00 per station 6030.00 CMP pipe 12" • ~ #ESTIMATE PROJECT P1773 - Courbney Lane by Ed Perry, P.E. DATE 03-Nov-99 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTIIY PftICE COST 1) DryWell - Type A EA 1.00 1200.00 1200.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 1700.00 0.00 3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00 0.00 4) GraRe Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 5) 6rete - Type 4 EA 1.00 300.00 300.00 8) Badcfill For DW CY 40.00 17.25 690.00 7) Dreinage Strudures, installed P12n callout EA Plan calEovt EA Plan callout EA Pian catlout EA Plan callout EA 7a) Conctete Intet BoX Type I EA 800.00 0.00 rb) Concrete Intet Bmc, Type 2 EA 800.00 0.00 6e) Curb Iniet Type 1(Detail B-8) EA 0.00 150.00 0.00 8b) Sidewallt Inlet, Type 2(Detail B-9, WilDart vault) EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 8c) WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA 1.00 1300.00 1300.00 S) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00 9) ADS n-12 Pipe 8" Dia. lF 54.00 12.00 648.00 8a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10) CMP 24" Dia. LF 0.00 38.00 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18' Dia. LF 0.00 12) Precast MBnhole EA 0.00 13) Sdid tid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Oitch snd Pand Excavation CY 12A0 0.00 15) Seed SF 1010.00 0.03 30.30 16) Ripap outfall ped CY 0.00 50.00 0.00 NON STANpARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) WiIbert Vault Gurb InteA (dela1 B-9) EA 250.00 0.00 2) Erosfon Ptotedion LS 1.00 1500.00 1500.00 3) Erosion Protedion • Rock entry LS 1.04 2000.00 2000.00 4) Type 1 inlet pad EA 1.00 200.00 200.00 5) 0.00 g) 0.00 ORAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7868.30 16) MonumeMs EA 2.00 185.00 370.00 17) Barricede LF 0.00 35.00 0.00 18) StrBet Signs EA 1.00 90.00 90.00 OTHER SUBTOtAL 460.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CL1RB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 2380.37 10.00 23803.70 20) Top Cautse CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Course CY 247.30 15.50 3833.09 22) Asphalt Concrete Totts 111.28 46.00 5119.03 23) Curb Typs A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 0.00 8.50 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YO 0.00 17.50 0.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD 17EMS 1) Cross-gutters 5Gl YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 q) 0.00 GRADIPIG AND SURFACING 32785.83 $41,084.13 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTtPLiER OF 1.10 $45,192.54 use $45,200.00 1980 staedaMs lnspectfon $0.00 use i4.00 y , . ♦ ~ ~ COUrtrwy Lal'1@ QU8libti@3 Grading tap floor avg depth Volume Swale 2385.00 1010.00 3.00 5092.54 cf 188.61 cy 3od 1010.00 sf 112.22 sy L W 1 W2 T qty Riprap at pipe outfalt 0+39 8.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.78 1.78 cy stop start width Road 775.00 18.50 16.00 Courtney Lane 756.50 12104.00 sf tangent depth earthwork 5.00 60520.00 cf 2241.48 cy base 6.00 0.50 6052.00 cf 224.15 cy acp 2.00 0.17 2017.33 cf 100.87 tons sum ex 2380.37 Hammertead area base 247.30 depth 1250.00 sf acp 111.28 earthwork 3.00 3750.00 cf 138.89 cy base 6.00 0.50, 625.00 cf 23.15 cy acp 2.00 0.17 208.33 cf 10.42 tons curb length Type R tangent 0.00 2.00 0.00 returns 0.00 0.00 Cu We-sac 0.00 0.00 total 0.00 Inspection 7.57 stations 500.04 per station 3782.50 6 ~BOND ESTIMATE - - - - - - - - PROJECT P1773 - Steen Court by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 21-Ju1-00 - - - - - - DRAINAGE ITEAAS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywefl - Type A 4096 EA 1.00 1200.00 480.00 2) Drywell - Type 8 4096 EA 3.00 1700.00 2040.00 3) C3rate - Type S EA 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 4.00 300.00 1200.00 6) Backrill For DW CY 150.00 17.25 2587.50 7) Drainage Structures, installed Plan callout EA Plan callout EA 7) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 800.00 0.00 7a) Sidewalk Inlei, Type I EA 0.00 0.00 7b) WSDOT Inlet Box 8 Orate EA 0.00 1300.00 0.00 8) CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00 9) ADS n-12 Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00 18.00 0.00 9a) CMP Pipe 12' Dia. LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10) CPEP Pipe 15" Die. (ADS n-12) LF 0.00 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 559.81 12.00 6717.67 15) Sod SF 5307.00 0.70 3714.90 16) Ripap outfall pad LS 1.40 500.00 500.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS - - - - 1) Wilbert Vault Curb inlet EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 2) Erosion Protection - sitt (ence LS 1.00 1000.00 1000.00 3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00 4) Type 1 curb cut inlet EA 9.00 200.00 1800.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 - - - - - - - DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 22040.07 16) Monuments EA 4.00 185.00 740.00 17) Barricade LF 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 1.00 90.00 90.00 - - OTHER SUBTOTAL 830.00 - - - - GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIOEWALK 19) Rough Grade 1045 CY 6705.05 10.00 6705.00 20) Top Course CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Course 3096 CY 1332.12 15.50 6194.00 22) AsphaR Concrete Tons 449.59 46.00 20681.22 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R 2096 LF 2678.90 8.50 4554.00 26) Sidewalk SGl YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 - - - NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS - - - - - - 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 38134.22 $61,004.28 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $67,104.71 use $67,200.00 1980 srandards Inspection $0.00 use $0.00 jA tle BOND ESTI MATE PROJECT P1773 - Courtney Lane by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 21-Jul-00 - - ORAINAGE ITEMS UNITS GlUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1.00 1200.00 1200.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 1700.00 0.00 3) Grate - Type 5 EA 0.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 1.00 300.00 300.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 40.00 17.25 690.00 7) Orainage Structures, installed Plan callout EA Plan caltout EA Plan callout EA Plan callout EA Plan callout EA 7a) Concrete Inlet Box, Type I EA 800.00 0.00 7b) Cancrete Intet Box, 7ype 2 EA 800.00 0.00 Sa) Curb Inlet Type 1(Oetail B-8) EA 0.00 150.00 OAO 8b) Sidewalk Inlet, Type 2(Detail B-9, Wdbert vault) EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 8c) WSDOT Inlet Box & Grate EA 1.00 1300.00 1300.00 8) CPEP Pipe 1(Y" Dia. lF 0.00 9) AOS n-12 Pipe 8" Dia. LF 54.00 12.00 648.00 9a) CMP Pipe 12" Oia. LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10) CMP 24" Dia. LF 0.00 38.00 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) Precast Manhola EA 0.00 13) Solid tid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 12.00 0.00 15) Seed SF 1010.00 0.03 30.30 16) Ripap outfall pad CY 0.00 50.00 0.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) Wilbert Vault Curb Inlet (detail B-9) EA 250.00 0.00 2) Erosion Protection LS 1.00 1500.00 1500.00 3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00 4) Type 1 inlet pad EA 1.00 200.00 200.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 - - - - - - - - DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7868.30 16) Monuments EA 2.00 185.00 370.00 17) Barricade LF 0.00 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 1.00 90.00 90.00 - - - OTHER SUBTOTAL 460.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, ANO SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 50% CY 2380.37 10.00 11902.00 20) Top Course CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Cours2 CY 247.30 15.50 3833.09 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 111.28 46.00 5119.03 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 0.00 8.50 0.00 26) Sidewalk SO YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 NdN-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) Cross-gutters SQ YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 20854.13 $29,182.43 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $32,100.67 use $32,200.00 1980 standards lnspection $0.00 use $0.00 J r DEVELOPER BOND REVIEW FORM ~ Project Name: ~►~~-E`~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~5 14P Project Number:, 1773 ~ Location: ocEQ s4+ ~ Originai Bond Arnount: A2, 1 ~ ~ 800 Original Bond Date: 5Ad~/~~ Bond Balance: i~ ~~p . ~ ~v ~ 01 Bond # REVIEW Last Review Date or Punch List Date: 90 Work Remaining to be Completed: AVO,,462)7Is 6,66 alVke-15- ~ r"► IlI A /Cr Reviewed by: Date: Findings: RECMMENDED ACTION: Fcirc-le Action) 1. Release Bond 2. Reduce Bond 3. Continue Bond By. , Date: Action Taken: (Circle Action) 1. Release Bond Letter 2. Reduce Bond Letter 3. Continue Bond 4. None gy: Date: , FOLLOW UP - Follow up Scheduled: Comments: Files Updated Comments: Date: By: Files Updated Comments: , Date: BY: A~ G Files Updated Comments: , Date: By: Files Updated Comments: , Date: , By: Files Updated Comments: . Date: By: ~ - • DEVELOPER BOND REVIEW FORM Project Name: Project Number: 177~ Location: Originai Bond Amount: 1&2,i Original Bond Date: Bond Balance: /o X Bond # . REVIEW Last Review Date or Punch List Date: ~ Llv~ 94 e,,, g Work Remaining to be Completed: ~~X--76V715 , A i,ciAG~- 7 ' Reviewed by: Date: Findings: - RECOMMENDED ACTION: (Circle Action) 1. Release Bond 2. Reduce Bond 3. Continue Bond gy: Date: Action Taken: (Circle Action) 1. Release Bond Letter 2. Reduce Bond Letter 3. Continue Bond 4, None gy: , Date: FOLLOW UP . ~ ~ ~v d Fol(ow up ScheduIed: Q ,~o tl`~1 Comments: Files Updated Comments: Date: By: Files Updated Comments: Date: By: Files Updated Comments: Date: By: Files Updated Comments: Date: By: Files Updated Comments: Date: By: ~ ASSIGNMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION WARRANTY BOND For security purposes only, SHELLY ACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE , hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, the following: Savings Certificate Number 28779 . in the face amount of $32,820.00 (Thirly two thousdnd eight hundred twenty dollars and NO/100 US Dollars) and held in and by sank Name BANK OF FAIRFIELD , SPANGLE Branch. For improvements related to: COUNTY PROJECT # P1773 PROJECT NAME: Shellev Acres ("Project") Said ASStGtvMEN1' FOrt wARRA1vTY BOtvD puxPOSES is made as security for the full and faithful performance by the Developer of a guarantee against all defects in worlmanship and materials which may become apparent during a period of one (1) year after the County's establishment of the improvements constructed under this project as public facilities. The County Engineer may request payment from the Bank for the purposes of remedy of such defects in materials and workmanship become apparent during the warranty period, by providing documentation to the Bank. The County Engineer's documentation shall indicate that the work done contains defects in materials or workmaaship in the construction of the improvements for the Project and therefore the purposes of said savings assignment have not been fully and faithfully performed as required. The County Engineer's . documentation shall also include a statement of the amount of money that the County deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon the Bank's receipt of such written documentation, the Developer hereby authorizes the Bank to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested, up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. The County Engineer shall provide a copy of all such documentation and correspondence with the Bank to the Developer at the address noted below. BANK: BANK OF FAIRFIELD ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 189 CITY, STATE, ZIl' : SP.4NGLE, WA 99031 . PHONE: (509) 245-3226 . AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: BOB JORGENSEN . TITLE: assistant vice president . PRINCIPAL: SHELLYACRES SUBDIVISION JOINT VENTURE WILLIAM W. N1,4IN IY MARK O. McMANUS ADDRESS: E. 12810 NORA SPOKANE, WA 99216 . PHONE: (509) 922-3000 DATED this 27 day of DECEMBER , 200 0. PRINCIPAL: Shelly Acres Subdivision Joint venture Developer: A Washington Pardlership , r ~ ~ ~ By: (typed name) Mark O. McManus, General Partner Williarm W. Main IY, General Partner State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that MARK O. McMANUS and WILLIAM W. MAIN IV are said persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the General Partners of Shelly Acres Subdivision Joint Venture to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses a3 urposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated 12/27/00 . ~ Nota~y Public in and ~ for the State of Washin on - , . - . MY Appointment Expires: - , _ ~ANV.f~HK. WALLER - ' NOTARY PUBLiC STA7E OF WASHINGTON COMMISSION FXPIRES BANK: OCTOBER 19, 2002 .~R , . w....,...... Bank of Fairfreld, Spangle Branch , (Bank Name) . A:(typedC' ' Corporation <e)Bob Jorgensen Its: (Title) Assistant Vice President State of Washington ) )ss County of Spokane ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that BOB JORGENSEN is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the assistant vice president of BANK OF FAIRFIELD to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes menrioned in the instrument. Dated I2127100 No Public in and ,o;~, for the State of Washington. ioo ~ N o Tq R y ; ~ My Appointment Expires: = • - - : • - ~ %v',►: PUBLIC . . . ~ . ,2, l~~~~ 1ti1111~ . . rn • , • . < , ~ ; ~ ;..a : ? ~A,~~ f f t} li • r , ~ SAVINGS ASSIGNNI_ENT FOR COIVSTRUCTION, SFOt<t,~i~ CC~~.~:~~`~ c~:~.~:l~:R For sccurity purpascs onlNI. Dcvcloper, as PRI~CiZ~:~L", hcrcb}• assigns to SPOItAVE COUTNITY. a political subdix•ision of the Slatc of Wastungton. tlic followinv: Saviiles Ccrtificatc Numbcr 28779 . in thc facc 3mount of US Currency 5213,300 Twu Hundred EighteLn Thuus:tnci Ei-vnt Hunclred and NO/100 IDallars Bank of Fairiie~d, S~~( ~;le jr.azc.h and hcld in and b~' _(i~?sert. Iiank.,rrc~nre, anc rn~~c,..__ ":~Nh' , itcini-_cd as follw%-s: Steen Court US Currency 5173,600 One Hundrecl Seventy-Three Thuusand Six Hundred and N01100 Dollars Courtncy Lane US Currency S45,200 Fortv-Five Thousand Ttivo Hundred and N01100 Doilars Tltis Assignmcnt is madc as sccuritv for tlic Cull and faitlLful pcrfonnancc bv tlic PR[i\Cl:PAL of tllc construction oC ccrlain roads, monumenls and drainage facilities for P1773 - Shelley Acres (the "Projeet"). as spccired in the hpical section and roadNvay improvements specilicalions for said project. accepted Novembet 5. 1999 on filc in t'lie OfFicc oC the Spokanc Countv Enginccr. Said work is to bc coniplcted. and thc work is to bc accepted bNl the Countti- Engineer, no later than two years from the date aP plan acceptancc. Failure bv the PRINCIPA.[. to obtain the Counly Enginecr's acceptance of the work bv the expiration datc of tlie pian acceptance shall constitute a material breach, and shall be grounds for immediate dernand b%- the Spokailc Couritv EnQinccr for full pavmcnt of tlic cniirc amount of tlus 4ssignment. Tlie pracceds of t}tis Assio7ltnent sliall be used bv the Countv Enginecr to complcle the remaining work. Amt surpius shall hc rcfundrd to thc PRINCIPaL. upon 1hc Countv Enginccr's acceptancc of the complcted work. Thc P.RItiCIPAL shail rcimbursc the Counn• Enginecr's Of~ficc for an%• costs in cxccss of tlic amount of the total amount of the financial guarantcc incurred by the County. including but not limitcd to construction. inspcction, adnunistration. collcctian agcncy fccs. and lcgal expenscs incuncd in securing the financial guarantee and completinQ the work. . Anv interest benefits accruing under said savings ccnificate shall remain the propertAl of the PRIiNCEPAL. The funds cncuinbcrcd bv this Assignmcnt arc lo bc relcascd to the PRItiTCIPAL or othcr duly designatcd partNonly AN-ith the prior Nvrittcn conscnt and agarcecncnt of the Spokanc County Enginecr. PROVTDED. F[JR7-HER. ilic undcrsigncd PRIIVCTPAL. cioes hcrcbN.- authorize the Bank lc pay ovcr to the Spokane Counn• Enginccr a11 or a sufficient portion of the inonies in the savin-s ccrtificate rcfcrenccd hcrcinabovc. upon «-rittcn docunicntation bcing rcccivcd from the Sgokanc Counn- Enpinccr indicatincy thal the purpases for which the sa\•-ings certi.ficatc was assianed havc not been fully and faithfulh- perforned as required and zi statement of that amount of money \vhich the Couiily EnQincer deems necessaix to coniplete sucti ebliQation. Lpoti reccipt of suc}i writtcn documentation. the PRINCIPAL herebv authorizes the Bani: lo rcleasC !o the Spokane Countv Enainccr tliat amouilt of inonc}' rcqucsicd up to lhc maxii,lum alnount in tlic savinws ccrti(`icatc. ~ DATED tlus 4th da`• of `lay 2000 SA `TK : Bank of Fairf ield A.DDkESS : P 0 BoY 189 CITY. STATE. ZIP : Spangle, 61A 99031-0189 ~ i ~ t S P O K A N E C O U N T Y 41 DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENf William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer December 21, 2000 Mr. Bob Jorgensen Bank of Fair6eld P.O. Box 189 Spangle, WA 99031 . Re: Reduction of Construction Performance Surety Savings Certificate No. 28779 Spokane County Project #P 1773 - Shelley Acres ~ Dear Mr. Jorgensen: The County is starting the process to establish the roads constructed in this project. This Savings Certificate may now be reduced from the original amount of $218,800.00 to $21,880.00 (Twenty Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty and NO/100 USDollars. If you have any questions, feel free to call our office at 477-3600. Sincerely, William A. Johns, P.E. Spokane County Engineer ~ . William H. Hemmings, P.E. Development Services EngineerlManager r 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(5{19) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Flnor) 477-7479 (Ird Floor) 9 TT)D: (509) 477-7133 S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DNISION OF ENGIIVEERWG AND ROADS A DCVISION OF THE PUBI.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., Counry Engineer July 20, 2000 Mr. Bob Jorgensen Bank of Fairfieid PO Box 189 Spangle, WA 99031 RE: Shelley Acres Addition (P 1773) Savings Certificate Number 28779 Dear Bob: We have received a request to reduce the above referenced savings certificate to reflect the current status of construction. Although Spokane County is under no obligation to .reduce any savings certificate it holds, we have elected to allow a reduction of this savings certificate from the original'amount of $ 218,800.00 to $ 99,400.00. Consideration of any further reductions to this savings certiticate will likeIy be based on continuous construction progress toward completion and acceptance of the public roads. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, &v- V ~ Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 _ • ~ • . . ~ ~ PHO-NE : 509-245-3226 AUTMORIZED Bob Jorgensen REPRESENTATIVE : TITLE : Assistant Vice President PRI~iCIPr~.L ~+'~.4 F"~/ ADDRESS : 411fl/c~~r i• ~ CITY. STATE, ZIP /VU 2"9 pHOiNE PRivi CIPAL: Shelly Acres Subdivision Joint Venture Dcvclopcr P- A Was ' n n ~ .~'-Z•L Z Bv: (typcd Namc) ti1 k 0. McManus, General Partners Its: (7'itlc) 131liam W. tilain IV, General Partners Statc of `Vashington ) )ss County of Spokane ) I cerlif~j that I kno~v or havc satisfacton, cvidcncc that lnani(,~c~ir~ ron)Ms ~ie pcrsoin~tlo ap~~arc~ bcFPor~ n~~and said person acknowledged that (AM~) signcd ttus instrumcnt. on oath statcd that (h~ARM was gRely~`edAc° res c~e MilaYfl&1NHom Gti~e i~stru~ettt anc~ckno~~~ledged it as the ~~rbFI"icer, trustee. etc.) of (name o~Aart%~ u1 1nsn.~mcn~t i~s cxcculcd) to be thc frcc and voluntan. - act of sucli pam~ for thc uses and . purposcs mcntioned in thc inst~, ~G%A M. y~Y /~i Datcci May 4, 2000 `AN ~Q'.•~ss~o'nF~.9,9 . . # ,o • , ~Q'TA ~ ~~L~.GC'.~~.~~- CG~Q~r t.._- . N Nolarv Public in and ~ for 1hc Statc of Washineton. PUBOG : 0: Mv APPoinlmcnl Expires: March 1, 2004 ~ '~s~ ~ ~ . ~ ~i~F'~ ~ BA~: /~z7~ ~ yy ~ S~ ~~\\N~ Bank of Fairfield, Spangle Branch (Bank Name) A W• s~ i ~ . orporation B~•: (t~pcd ~~amc) gob Jorgensen Its: (Tillc)Assistant Vice President State of WasiunLyton ) )ss COLIIIIV OF Sp0kaI1e ~ Bob Jor ense f ccrtifi~ tliat I.o« or havc satisfactorv c\-idtnce ihat (namc oi ncAon) is t~lc pcrson who appcared tiefore me. and said pcrson ackno%iledecd that (hck;k) sigmcd this instnimcni. on oatli statcd that (hc'PAz) %tias autho:iz-1d to . • . ~ ~ . ~ ~ssi~sta t.~ice Prsident Bank f cxccutc lhc instniitlent and ackno%~•lcd cd it as thc -oc o au~~vric.~.. o zccr, trustcc. ctc.) of (narnc opoartv on t~W tg ~6Oltl lI1SLTU111Ci1t «-as cxccuted) to be tlle frce and voluntaR- act of such partv for the uses and purposcs mcntioncd in thc inst ``l,101» Dated `'iay 4, 2000 `~~~~~Q•~G1 SioM'. ~~050 • . C-CJ~Z2d~-- ~ Q;•oa`~~5 •~fi°%'=90 ~ Q NOTAR y`~ rNotary Ptiblic iri and for the Statc of Wasliington. PU6LIC , p~ M\- Appointmenl Expires: March 1, 2004 i ,4! 'A.',~! 0 ;ly~ A c,1 ' , - , t`. ` _ P1773 - Sheliey Acres Bond Summary Steen Court construction $173,600.00 inspection $0.00 Courtney Lane construction $45,200.00 inspection $0.00 total $218,800.00 Note: 1980 standards, so County inspects 1 • T • , • • t 9 80ND ESTIMATE PROJECT P1773 - Steen Court by Ed Parry, P.E. QATE 03-Nov-99 ORAINAGE ITEMS UNffS QUANTfTY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1.00 1200.00 1200.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 3.00 1700.00 5100.00 3) G rate - Type 5 EA 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 FA 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 4.00 300.00 1200.00 6) Baclcfiil For DW CY 150.00 17.25 2587.50 7) Orainage Structures, installed Plan callout EA Plan callout EA 7) Concrete Iniet Box. Type I EA 800.00 0.00 7a) Sidewalk Inlet, Type I EA 0.00 0.00 7b) WSQ07 Inlet Bflx 8 Grate EA 0.00 1300.40 0.00 8) CPEP Fipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00 9) ADS n-12 Pipe 12" Dia. LF O.QO 18.00 0.00 9a) CMP Pipe 12" Dia. LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10) CPEP Pipe 15" Dia. (ADS n-12) LF 0.00 O.dO 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) Precast Manhoie EA 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 559.81 12.40 6717.67 15) Sod SF 5307.00 0.70 3714.90 16) Ripap autfall pad LS 1.00 500.00 500.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ffEMS 1) Wilbert Vauft Curb inlet EA 0.00 250.00 0.00 2) Erosion Protection - silt fence LS 1.00 1000.00 1000.00 3) Erosion Protection - Rock entry LS 1.00 2000.00 2000.00 4) Type 1 cLrb cvt infet EA 9.00 200.00 1800.00 5~ 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 25820.07 16) Monumertts EA 4.00 185.00 740.00 17) Barricade LF 35.00 0.00 . 18) Street Signs EA 1.00 90.00 50.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 830.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 6705.05 10.00 67050.48 20) Top Course CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Course CY 1332.12 15.50 20647.91 22) Asphatt Concrete Tons 449.59 46.00 20881 22 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type 8 LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 2678.90 8.50 22770.65 26) Sidew8lk SO YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD fTcMS 1} 0.00 2~ 0.00 3~ 0.00 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 13115026 $157,800.33 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUdING MULTIPLIER OF 1.10 $173,580.36 use $173,600.00 1980 standards fnsaection $0.00 use $0.00 , • ~ - Steen Court Quarrtities Grading Swales top fioor avg depth Volume Pond A 2875.00 1800.00 2.00 4675.00 Pond B 2500.00 936.00 2.00 3436.00 Pond C 3584.00 1886.00 1.00 2735.00 Pond D 2730.00 685.00 2.50 4268.75 15114.75 cubic ft 559.81 cubic yards L W T Roadside 300.00 30.00 2.00 9000.00 333.33 CY sodlseed 5307.00 sf sad 589.67 sy stop start width Road 1206.00 0.00 37.00 Steen Court 1206.00 44622.04 sf tangern depth earthwork 3.50 156177.00 cf 6117.67 cy base 8.00 0.67 29748.00 cf 1101.78 cy acp 2.00 0.17 7437.00 cf 371.85 tons sum Cui-de-sac area ex 6705.05 depth 9329.00 sf base 1332.12 earthwork 1.70 15859.30 cf 587.38 cy acp 449.59 base 8.00 0.67 6219.33 cfi 230.35 cy acp 2.00 0.17 1554.83 cf 77.74 tons curb length Type R # sides tangent 1206.00 2.00 2412.00 returns 18.45 2.00 36.90 Cui-de-sac 230.00 230.00 total 2678.90 sidewalk tangent 0.00 1980 standards return 0.00 cul-de-sac 0.00 0.00 0.00 sf 0.00 sy inspectian 12.06 stations 500.00 per station 6030.00 CMP pipe 12" • , , , 6--..v0 ESTiMATF PROJECT P1773 - Courtney Lane by Ed Parry, P.E. DATE 03-Now99 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Orywell - Type A EA 1.00 1200.00 1200.00 2) OrywP.il - Type 8 EA 1700.00 0.00 3) Grate • Type 5 EA 0.00 OAO 4) Grate Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 S) Grate - Type 4 EA 1.00 300.00 300.00 8) Bactdp Fot OW CY 40.00 17.25 690.00 n Drainage Sirudures, installed Plan callout EA Plan callout E.1 Plan cailout EA P4an callout EA Plan caltout EA 7a) Concrete Intei Box Type 1 EA 800.00 0.00 7b) Concrete Inlet Box, Type 2 EA 8C0•00 0.00 8a) Curb Inlef Type 1(Qeta+l B-8) EA 0.00 150.00 0.00 Sb) SidewaNc Intet, Type 2(Qetail B-9, WilbeR vault) EA OAO 250.00 0.00 8c) WSDOT tnld Box 8 Grate EA 1.00 1300.00 1300.00 8} CPEP Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00 8) ADS n-12 Pipe 8" Qia. LF 54.00 12.00 648.00 9a) CMP Pipe 12' Dia LF 0.00 20.00 0.00 10} CMP 24' Dia. LF 0.00 38.00 0.00 11) CPEP Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 12) Precast Manhde EA 0.00 13) Solid tid EA 325.00 0.00 14) Ditch and Pond Excavation CY 12.00 0.00 15) Seed SF 1010.00 0.03 30.30 16) Ripap outfdl pad CY 0.00 50.00 0.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) WiibPrt Vautt Curb Inlet (de4aii &9) EA 250•00 0.00 2) Erosion Protection LS 1.00 1500.00 1500.00 3) Erosion Protectian - Roclc entry LS 1.a0 2000.00 2000.00 4) Type 1 iMet pad EA 1.00 200.00 200.00 5) 0.00 6) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 7868.30 16) Monumerrts EA 2.00 185.00 370.00 17) Barricade LF 0.00 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 1.00 90.00 90.Q0 OTHER SUBTOTAL 460.00 GRADING, SURFACING CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade CY 2380.37 10.00 2380.3.70 20) Top CAurse CY 15.50 0.00 21) Base Course CY 247.30 15.50 3833.09 22) Asphalt Concrete Torts 111.28 46.00 5119.03 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 0.00 8.50 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) Cross-gutters SQ YD 0.00 17.50 0.00 2) O.tiO 3) 0.40 4) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 32755.83 $41,084.13 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL, INCLUDING Br1ULTIPLIER aF 1.10 345,192.54 use $45,200.00 1980 standards lnspection $0.00 use $0.00 . ' Y • , ' . Courtrcey Lane Quarrtities Grading top floor avg depth Volume Swale 2385.00 1010.00 3.00 5092.50 cf 188.61 cy Sod 1010.00 sf 112.22 sy L W1 W2 T qry Riprap at pipe outfall 0+39 8.00 6.00 6.00 1.00 1.78 1.78 cy stop start width Ruad 775.00 18.50 16.00 Courtrt8y Lane 756.50 12104.00 sf tangerrt depth earthwork 5.00 60520.00 cf 2241.48 cy base 6.00 0.50 6052.00 cf 224.15 cy acp 2.00 0.17 2017.33 cf 100.87 tons sum ex 2380.37 Hammerttead area base 247.30 depth 1250.00 sf acp 111.28 earthwork 3.00 3750.00 cf 138.89 cy base 6.00 0.50 625.00 cf 23.15 cy acp 2.00 0.17 208.33 cf 10.42 tons curb length Type R . tangent 0.00 2.00 0.00 returns 0.00 0.00 CuWe-sac 0.40 0.00 total 0.00 Inspection 7.57 stations 500.00 per station 3782.50 - ' . SHELLEY ACRES ADDITION CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE Date: 21-Jun-99 Prepared by Metro Engineering, Inc. By: JKO Project No. 97-035 Checked: JGL i . UNIT ESTIMATED ITEM NO. JESCRIPTION QUANTI UNITS COST ~ SANITARY SEWER 1 PVC SDR 35 incl. trench exc. 914 LF $20.00 $18,280,00 2 Manhole Type III-48 1 EA $1,500.00 31,500.00 3 Manhole Type 1-48 3 EA a2,000,00 $6,000.00 4 Side Sewer p+pe 4" dia. 612 LF a20.00 a12,240,00 5 4" Side Sewer C.O. 3 EA a100.00 a3pp.00 Sut}Total a38,320.00 WATER LINE 6 Backfill & Compact Ex. Wabeftine (apprrnc 3' depth) 1LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 7 Water Servtce 2 EA $200.00 a400.00 8 Valve Box on Ejasting Wateriirte Vahres 4 EA $125,00 a500.00 9 8" C9rJ0 Cfass 150 PVC ind. trench exc. 233 LF $18.00 b4,194,00 10 8" FL x MJ Adapbef 2 EA $100.00 y200.00 11 8" FL x FL x FL Tee 1 EA a360,00 $350_00 12 8" FL x MJ Gabe Valve 1 EA a700,00 a700,00 13 8"MJ x 8"MJ x 6"FL Tee 1 EA 3350.00 a350.00 14 8" MJ Plug 1 EA $100.00 $100.00 15 5' FL Vera Standard Fire Hydrartt Assembly 1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000.00 16 Thrust Block 4 EA a100,00 $400.00 Sub-Total $11,194.00 STREET AND DRAINAGE 17 Clearing & Grubbing 1 -LS $1,000.00~ $1,000.00" 18 Erosion & Sedtrnent Corttrd 1 LS $1, 000.00 $1,000.00 19 Excavatian, Induding Haul (See Nobe 1) 1,551 CY $5.00 $7,755.00 20 EmbankmeM (See Nube 1) 1,460 CY $2.00 $2,920.00 21 Subgrade Preparaton 6,576 SY $1.00 a6,576.00 22 Type "R" Concrete Curb 8 Gutber 2,018 LF $7.00 $14,126.00 23 Concrebe Curb Inlets (See Note 2) 7 EA $75.00 $525.00 24 Asphait Paving - 2" A.C. on S" rock (12th Ave.) 1,175 SY $10.00 $11,750.00 25 Aspfialt Paving - 2" A.C. on S" roclc (Sbeen Ct) 3,915 SY $10.00 $39,150.00 26 Asphatt Paving - 7' AC. on 5' rock (Courfiey) 1,486 SY $9.00 $13,374.00 27 Type"A:' Drywe{l 2 EA $1,750.00 $3,500.00 28 Type "8" Drywell 3 EA $2,000.00 $6,000.00 29 W.S.D.O.T. Grate Inlet Type 2 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500.00 30 8" CPEP, ADS N-12 Corrugated Pipe 58 LF $18.00 $1,044.00 31 Rip-Rap Pad 1 Eq a300.00 $300.00 32 "208" Swale Construction (5 swales) 236 CY $10.00 $2,360.00 33 Off-Site Interception Dftch 1,555 LF $2.00 $3,110.00 34 Turf ReirTforcement Matting 347 SY $5.00 $1,735.00 35 Hydroseeding 38,500 SF $0.07 $2,502.50 36 Street Name Sign 2 EA g200,00 S400.00 Sut-Total $120627.5p GRAND TOTAL (ESTIMATE) $170,141.50 Notes: 1) Courtney Lane only, Steen Caurt assumed to be rough graded. Quantities do not include lot grading. 2) The quantities and estimate are not guaranteed to be accurate and are fumished without any liability on the part of the Engineer. OFFICE OF THE COUNrrY ENGINEER SPOKP,NE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: BILL HEMMINGS FROM: DAVE BERTO DATE: May 9, 2000 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS P1773 SHELLEY ACRES The bond for the above mentioned project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans. . . ~ ' • ~ PROJWT NAM&- .4121,17-IW INSpECtbR: ~Go r;[>4w!!~ DA?8: -7 f/ 3/0 0 CONTRACTOR ANDIOR sUBCONTRACTURS: a,0DA7ZV 101Z&1Oe) ~ L ~2 f u]iu~LFJ2 ~ ; t-mis: eD,c15 i 2acT PP,A 1A.i4 PaAi,05 f Q1 ~ ~ ~,5 LVf~~1ni~ iz~. A~p~2v ~5r~ P~~l~✓~ . l6f/ob . 2) P&4 cZ A LL ; 4 .q 5~f-,~- 4-7 O~t..,i RO~~r~J.1~17~ dl ~ ~ 4 Ct5' /Q 0A 12 HUkJ"GL14e5~-1 i 5 . , iQo A-04A)II ~ av A-rpr,6-rE ~ . . glPP,419 oa r~=~~L- /2Ar~ e,414P /ofz'.4oa I ~ q)R6PAie- A&c. ARZ4y dic~' eu46 1?41r4&o6V -7114i~gz612 a&tjra : . , _ 6AZ*~-V! c.uA!(o ~41/40 ~r . , , SBWEIt INFORhiA?ION: emA~E rC~~~ECT' ~}it,/ . . . : ~ . ~ ~ . --r:I , AIR~ : ~ DATS: D PAS3 - o FAIL Dri~1N'D~BLt; DATB: o pAST o pAji, ~ • /~Y ~ATEk r • ~ ~ . ~ A'9 31aNAZ'tJRB: . . . • • . r»..~ , • y.. , • . ~ • : ~ . ~ • • • ' . l. . • ~ ~ • 1 - • ~ • ~ ~t♦ 1• • w 1~ ~r , ~r.•` , ..r ~ T ~ ~ ~ • ` S -70 . • • • • ~ . • . , . ~ 1 ~ • . ~ . ~ ~ r 1 . . . ~y •1.~ ~r~+w ~ ..i • ~ ~ . oIr war~ im~ • o Cr c Q~~ec s.qv>>> i ~o,cJ I~SpECi'OR: p~GD r;v~,t~5 DATB: 7/j 31ri0 ~ C~Ni'RACTOR ANDlOR 3UBCONR"RACTORS: 1 ; G L 662 f u)iA.i,Q, 64-71 . ,r~i~Ai~v4 66 , PotirO5 ~A,6, G, ff~i , ~ t~LVROIAA., 77-0. AAOr2Oi45D PL~lit/5 , c~~-t P 16fZ.Zj1oe ~ z) Pc 4 t~ A 1,L ~ ; ,e6~5: f Rv/-l0/rr.l,ev LI~26aAif> ~-t. ~ ~ - ; ~ ~LA LE CS i G ~4 &jO i4 OA.1 .l 4 Ci5 /7 HV,vUjA-ee5~ v r,5 . ~ 60,'..JD4Zu A klWO ZWAIit1A665 i 2~5% vrtlGE . , . , - /QO!a 04,C)/I A-tP L"c TE ! GQ ~.E~-tE,u ~ ~~-lR i E,2i•4 L s ~P~eltI47-e ioifMEc.rraAel) r . . Or:( Tt'~LL ~~1~ (~MP ID/c~DG ~ , - . ~ ~4#40 eUO'~7 . 1 ~ I r ~ 1 ~ f ~ ~ . sEWEt WFORD►zATioK: --~-Tl~ , AIR- : DA?F; o pAS3 'oPAII, . ~tAI~tD ~ DA►T8: o pA33' p PAIL '1Y ~ N ~EQVBSI: DA'I'S: • • . ~ . . • • ~ . . • ~ . • y~ . ~ ? • ~ . • • ~ ' i ~ ' • • ~ • • ~ _ l . « , . • i . ~ • • • • • • ' • • ~ • • ~ ~ • ~~r N~.• . • ~ ~ • ~ ' ~r. , . . ~ ~ , , ~ ~ , 'L1?~~~f • ' ~y I.~•~I M ~ Spokane County Public Works Division of Engineering & Roads 1026 West Broadway Avenue T Spokane, WA 99260-0170 www.spokanecounty.org SPOM~ COLT~ Phone 509/477-3600 Fax 509/477-7478 Date /n 7 - oc~' Fax No. ~ C--, ~ 1 3 3 2 Pages (including cover sheet) 2 TO ~ From ~ ~ Message ~ ELLER CORPORATION P.O. BOX 117 NEWMAN LAKE, WASHINGTON 99025 PHONE: 509-226-0333 FAX: 509-226-1332 ANEQUAL OPPORTUNITYEMPLOYER EL-LE-RC*242C3 DI3E ll D2F3909032 December 12, 2000 ~SC~I VSD Paul Lenneman DFC ~ 3 Public Works Dept. sqpk" Spokane County Engineers E ~~UNTy E 1026 W. Broadway Avenue N~f~EFR Spokane, WA 99260-0170 RE: SHELLY ACRES ADDITION We have been in contact with Penny Flowers concerning the punch list items for this project. At this time, all the items are completed and accepted by Penny Flowers except for the "road drainage test". Miss Flowers said the road drainage would be checked after the next rainstorm, which may be several months away. However, in order to release the Owner's bond before this test, Miss Flowers said that Spokane County would accept a written guarantee from Eller Corporation that the deficiencies would be conected if the roadway did not drain conectly. Enclosed is said guarantee from Eller Corporation. The new pavement is also dirty from the current home building. Penny Flowers also requested a statement that the pavement would be cleaned, if necessary, next spring. Enclosed is said guarantee from the Project Owner, Shelly Acres Subdivision L.L.C. Penny Flowers could not confirm that the road monuments had been installed because of the ice on the roadway. The Project Owner has told us that all the monuments have been installed. Please contact the Project Owner representative, Mr. Mark McManus, at 509-924-0968 or Eller Corporation if there is anything that would hold up the release of the bonding. Sincerely, ELLER CORPORATI4N Michael D. Wilson, P.E. Proj ect Manager cc: Mark McManus enclosures Spokane Co.-Lenneman-2.doc t r . ' ELLER CORPORATION . P.O. BOX 117 NEWMAN LAKE, WASHINGTON 99025 PHONE: 509-226-0333 FAX: 509-226-1332 ANEQUAL OPPORIZIMTYEMPLOYER ~ EL-LURC*242C3 DBE # D2F3909032 ! December 12, 2000 . To: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS AND SHELLY ACRES SUBDIVISION L.L.C. RE: SHELLY ACRES ADDITION ROAD DRAINAGE GUARANTEE Eller Corporation warrants and guarantees to Spokane County and Shelly Acres Subdivision L.L.C. that the roadway will drain per the Construction Drawings. If, after the drainage test performed by Spokane County, it is determined that the roadway does not drain properly, Eller Corporation will correct the deficiencies to meet Spokane County's specifications. Sincerely, ELLER CORPORATION ~ Helen M. Eller President Shelly Acres DrainAge Warranty.doc 12/ 11 / 2000 23 : 22 9268436 _ MARK MCMAN~IS PAGE 01 _ . . . _ . . . 12-t 3-00 Spokac►e County Engineers: She]ley Acres subdivision roads and stonm water facilities are camplete except foT cteaning the roads. At the present time the roads are covered with snow which malces it diffiGUh to clean the mads. This letter is imended to be a cvmmitment for the uRdexsigned Lo assume responsibility to clean the roads in tht spring of200j. We appreciate your patience with this. Thank you, ~ . . /&/Wrke u GeneralPartne,r Shelley Acres Subdxvision L.L.C. ~ -1 ~ i ' i ) + ~ S P O K A N E s' C O U N T Y - , DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DMSIOtv OF TxE PUBi.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer July 13, 1999 Mr. Joel Lee, PE Metro Engineering, Cnc. S. 324 Sherman St. Spokane, WA 99242 RE: P-1733 - Shelly Acres Addition Plan Submittal #1 / Rcview Comments Dear Joel: I received your plan submittal on June 18, 1999 and I have suspended review until the following comments are addressed: 1. There is a problem with your plan to intercept the off site drainage with the ditch you have snown. We allow this to be done when the flow is conveyed back to a drainage channcl where it naturally went or you can handle the flows on site with a treatment and ciisposal system that is approved. In this case there is no definecl drainage that I can see on the topo drawing to redirect the watcr back to. The Spokane County Guidelioes for Stormwater Management do not allow you to concentrate water in a place w6ere the water sheet flowed before. 2. T6e ditch can not be built in the easement that is shown with out going outside the plat in one area. The cut slopes will extend bcyond the property iine in at least one area. 3. The private drive will ueed additional easement areas where the cut and fill slopes will catch the exisling ground slope. Please revise. 4. The ditch ivill have at least three hydraulic jumps that vvill have to be controlled if it is built. Please provide calculations anci erosion protection for thcse areas if you still want to build the ditch. 5. The 208 lot plan do not have any cross section drawiogs for the swales. Please provide. As a suggestion, you may want to consider allowing the off site flows to come into the lots as they - have in the past. If you were to decidc to do this you would then design the 208 ponds for the 50 year storm and there appears to be sufficient area in the lots to provide larger ponds if necessary. T6is would simplify the construction and reduce costs and mainten:ince. If you 6ave any questions, pleasc call me. Sincerely, r e~.) ~ Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 OPERATION A.ND MAINTENACE MANUAL FOR SHEL- LEY ACRES ADDITION Metro Engineering, Inc.'s Pro j ect No. 97-035 06/ 18/99 04 wAs,rir e~ . o , ~p ;,~►,p~:~• :;{*N'-WOUMENT 4 ti. r i- ~~'cps QIJTB OFFICE ~I~NAL 8~ • LEXPIRES 2/21IOf - 177,_ ~ . ~ SU13i~I77~k~~r . . . . o... ~ RETURN,,TQ; Prepared By: Metro Engineering, InG S. 324 Sherman St. Spokane, WA 99202 Ph.: (509) 624-93 51 Fax: (509) 624-8153 SHELLEY ACRES OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 2 FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS 4 APPENDED MATERIAL MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST/REPORT APPENDIX A POST CONSTRUCTION DRAWIINGS POCKET 1 i , INTRODUCTION This Operation and Maintenance Manual is for the stormwater collection and disposal system which serves Shelley Acres Addition. The Shelley Acres Homeowners Association is responsible and liable for the ma.intenance and operation of the stormwater facilities within Shelley Acres Addition. The record drawings which give the specifics of the drainage facilities are located in the attached pockets. The Homeowners Association shall designate an individual or group of individuals (herein referred to as the operator) to be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities. The operator shall be familiar with the facilities and have an understanding of the intent of the facilities. They shall also be familiar with general good operating practices for stormwater collection and disposal. They must keep the interest of the public and the homeowners as the highest priority during their operation and maintenance. RESPONSIBILITY It is the responsibility of Shelley Acres Homeowners Association to provide effective, efficient, and continuous operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities and related appurtenances. DESCRIPTION OF TI-E SYSTEM Please refer to the record drawings in the atta.ched pockets. The stormwater system is comprised of offsite interception ditches, collection system (i.e. catch basin and pipe), `208' ponds and drywells. 1 e _ MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION The ponds, ditches, catch basin and drywells sha11 be visually inspected once each month. Visual inspections should increase to twice per month during the winter and spring months. A visual inspection should follow all major storm events. The ponds and ditches should be maintained per the outline below and as listed on the maintenance checklist (Appendix A). Sediment deposits in the bottom of the ponds shall be removed regularly in order to maintain the design volume. The drywells shall be kept free of obstructions, _ including sediment. MAINTENANCE TASK FREOUENCY 1. Summer lMarch-Octoberl V'isual Inspection Monthly and after major rain events Ponds: Weeding/weed control As necessary, remove noxious weeds as they appear Raking and litter control As necessary, primarily at the end of autumn Mowing As necessary Remove sediment As necessary Drywells: Clear debris (including excess vegetation) As necessary to keep overflow clear from overflow Cleanout drywells As necessary to keep capacity Offsite Interception Ditches: Weeding/weed control As necessary, remove noxious weeds as they appear Raking and litter control As necessary, primarily at the end of autumn Storm Pipe: Clean and flush lines Annually or as necessary to keep pipe clean 2 s ' II. Winter (November-Februarv) Visual Inspection and litter control Semi-monthly and after major rain events Clear snow & ice from grates and As necessary to keep grates and inlets inlets clear GENER.AL NOTES: 1. Generally the ponds should be watered to keep the grass green and healthy. Precautions shall be taken to not over water the soil. Do not over water. 2. Grass clippings and other debris from maintenance of the pond, ditches and common areas shall not be dumped in the ponds. Rubbish, litter and materials removed during maintenance shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 3. The `208' ponds are intended to handle typical residential strength stormwater runoff. Hazardous materials, such as, but not limited to, oil, fertilizers,_paint, battery acid, antifreeze, fuel oil, and other materials commonly recognized as deleterious to water quality shall not be discharged into the stormwater system. Precautions should always be taken to prevent these items from entering the stormwater system. If hazardous materials accidentaUy enter the stormwater system they sha11 be removed and disposed of immediatelv by approved methods. 4. All stormwater facilities within Shelley Acres Addition sha11 be maintained by the Homeowners Association. This maintenance plan and schedule is only a rough guide; the intent is to keep the stormwater facilities fully functional and maintained as a neighborhood asset. The schedule may need to be adjusted after the stormwater facilities have been in operation and their performance observed. 3 . FnvAvcIAL coNSmExATloNs The design life of the drainage system (assuming minimal maintenance) could be anywhere from 20 to 50 years. The service life of the facilities depends almost entirely on how well the facilities have been maintained. The annual maintenance cost to repair and maintain the stormwater system is estimated at $500. The annual replacement cost set-aside for the stormwater system is calculated at $596. Figuring the annual cost and the replacement cost amortized over 20_ years the annual amount to be set aside to operate and maintain the system shall be $1096. The Shelley Acres Homeowners Association shall create a"sinkirig-fund" to account for maintenance and replacement of the drainage facilities. The above annual amount shall be added to the account annually. Expenses to maintain the system will come out of this account. However, the fund should grow annually by the amortized replacement cost. Liability insurance shall be camed by the Homeowners Association, per the Spokane County Code. This liability insurance needs to cover all pond easement areas and interests held by the Homeowners Association. Sinking Fund Reserve Account Calculation for Operation and Mai.ntenance Costs plus Replacement Costs For Annual Cost per Lot Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs $500 Present Value of Drainage System, PV $207000 Assume 50% replacement of pond and structures in 20 yrs. PV/2 =$10,000 Future Value to replace in 20 years, FV FV=PV/2(F/P, 4%, n=20) assuming inflation = 4%, n=20 FV=$10,000(2.1911 )=$21,911 Annual Set-aside for future replacement, A A=$2131911 (A/F,6%,n=20) assume conservative investment; interest=6% A=$211911 (0.0272)=$596 . Tota1 charges per Lot Tota1 Annual Charge =(O&1V)+(A) 13 lots Total Annual Charge =$1096 Annual ChargeJLot =(Anriual Costs) + Annual Charge/Lot =$1096/13 lots (anriual set-aside amount, A) _ $84.30 (use $SS) 4 ~A ~►I EN A~'p ~ NoTE: SHELLEY ACRES ADDITON , Pu, dote of inspection/ MAINTENANCE CHECKLIST mcinlenance in oox ond initiol. YEAR: COMPONENT/TASK FREQUENCY JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV JEC "208" PONDS ' VISUAL INSPECTION SUMMER MONTHLY # VISUAL INSPECTION WINTER SEMI-MONTHLY* WEED/LITTER CONTROL AS NECESSARY RAKING AS NECESSARY IviOW AS NECESSARY RkMOVE SEDIMENT ANNUALLY OR ! AS NECESSARY DRYWLLLS & CA7CH BASIN CLFAR DEBRIS FROM GRATE AS NECESSARY CLEANQUT CATCH F3ASIN & PIPING AS NECESSARY CLEAN OUr ORY WELLS AS NECESSARY PIPE FROM CATCN BA51N TO POND VISUAL INSPECTION MONTHLY * CLEAN PIPE AS NECESSARY OFFSITE INTERCEPTION DITCHES VISUAL INSPECTION MONTHLY * WfED/LITTER CONTROL/RAKING AS NECESSARY . . , r . . . . . . COMMENTS: " AND AFTER EACH MAJOR RAIN EVENT 7035-ON.OWC 06/18/99 f . G. L - - - I F w~.Syf~~ ; o ~0 30891 L~/~' r~•.. t~'ssI GISTER 2 5 50 100 ONAL , SCALE: 1 50' ' EXPIRES 2-21-01 I _j C Z wl LLI w~ s - L=274_29 -~10~ L~ . w+ N,~ zl so 0 0 °o• ol DRYWELL D 70 ~ \ I T.O. G. - 2042. 7 1 ~ 1 0~ r z IoN 30, ° m PRIVATE ROAD 4 o~ EASEMENT ~ m \ o \ ~N ° „208" POND "D" BOTTOM EL.=2042.2 E- ~ ~ 1 ► loool Z > > I O 30' ~ DRAINAGE I I ~ I cr EASEMENT I , S 85'10'79" E 234.26' ~ LL, LLJ U ' I I I LLJ I I if ` 7035-208.DWG XREF: 70358ASE.OWG V: BK1-LT6 ~ ~ METRO ENGINEERING, INC. SHEL~LE1' ACRES ADDITON ~ S. 324 SHERMAN LOT 6, BLOCK 1 SPOKANE. WA 99202 DRAWN BY: JKO ~ DATE: 06/04/99 ~ (509) 624-9351 CHECKED BY: JGL ~ PROJECT No.: 97-035 ~ / \ \ S ~ 62. 6s6~ 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1 50' \ DRAI NqGE EASE~~Nr ~ - DRYWELL, T.O.G.=2081.5 15 '~T=52. p.00 49' / R p -38 34'27" ~ i O~ gg S 39' J4 26 : w 95.91 r i 30' PRIVATE ROAD ~ . ` in10 / O \ ~ i EASEMENT ~t C-; h \ W F- \ W 1 ^?uj \ ~Q c)W PRIVqTE ROAD ~SEMENT ~ 3p'~ , ~ "208" ~ ~ - ~ ~ pRqINAGE ~ ~ POND „E,. BOTTOM EL. EASEMENT V' ~ 2081.0 ~ N M . ~ LLI (V pp `V ~ ~ LC) . ~o \ ~~P \ . . ~ . . ~ SETBACK L.lNE - \ UTILITY EASEMENT `,----"--o L=12s.oo'~ ~LG.L ti C~R6 ~ - CU'ER ~ -~Ef9 COU1~T= ~ ~ S ~ Ook ,Q 30691 ~ -CISTER G1'~ f0NAL ' EXPIRES 2-21-01 ~ ~ 7035-208.DWG XREF: 7035BASE.DWG V: BK1-LT4 ~ ~ METRO ENGINEERING, INC. SHEL~LEY U CRES ADDIT o►v \ S. 324 SHERMAN LOT 4, BLOCK 1 SPOKANE. WA 99202 DRAWN BY: JKO ~ DATE: 06/04/99 ~ (509) 624-9351 CHECKED BY: JGL ~ PROJECT No.: 97-035 ~ . / - - ~ . ~ N -0-0'26'34 'j E 747.>>. ~ 0 25 50 100 SCALE: 1 50' z ~ ~ S~ oF wa~r~~' . 4~ oo + Z m rn b . ~ . ,p • . ~ Z_ OA ~ 30891 ~y . • ~ N_ S CISTE41'~ ~ j0 NAL ~ I EXPIRES 2-21-01 ~ ~ Ll NE PG~ ~ ~ o_ EASEME/VT ~ J j\~ L~14S>j ~0 " \ 117 51. ~RAINqGE I ~ ~ L 1 ~SEME~IT ~ ~ . DRYWELL T.O.G.=2034.7 3. ~ , 05.6 • 33. 26"NPl - ~ z N24 C ~ W ,.E 143,41 \URB 116.58; ns~" cQ~\iV n ~,C~~ LV V BOTTOM EL.=2034.2 ~ . ~ ~ 7035-208.DWG XREF: 70358ASE.OWG V: 13K2-LT5 ~ ~ METRO ENGINEERING, INC. SHEL~LEY U CRES AODITON ~ S. 324 SHERMAN LOT 5, BLOCK 2 SPOKANE, WA 99202 DRAWN BY: JKO ~ DATE: 06/04/99 ~ (509) 624-9351 CHECKED BY: JGL ~ PROJECT No.: 97-035 / . . • G. L 0, 30891 ~w c~s GISTER SrONAL ~ EXPIRES 2-21-01 ~ . ~ O O ~ ~0 N 0 2s 50 100 0 o - . . z ~rp.! E: 1 50, 2s' o~INACE ~S EtyENr . ~ ~ . ~ "208" POND "B" BOTTOM EL.-2032.7 2 ry ~ CIO .O.DRYWELL ~RAD T ~4SE ACK ~ ~ c 2033 2 ~ ~ ~ ,MENr s~rB . UTILiTY EASEMEN~ 1 > ~ o - ~ L=226.29, & Gv~ER ~ ~ f ~ - R~ ~ STE EN Cov ` 7035-208.DWG XREF: 7035BASE.DWG V: BK2-LT1 / ~ METRO ENGINEERING, INC. SHEL~ILEY ACRES ADDITON \ S. 324 SHERMAN LOT 1, BLOCK 2 SPOKANE, WA 99202 DRAWN BY: JKO ~ DATE: 06/04/99 ~ (509) 624-9351 CHECKED BY: JGL ~ PROJECT No.: 97-035 ~ . GO\.l T ~ ~ ~ CURg i ~PS~MEN~ / + ' o - - - - L=14 DRYWELL ROAD EASEMENT T.O.G.=2033.2 I f ~ - I - SETgACK ~1NE ^ + w ~ - - a o Q I 11208" POhD "A., BOTTOM EL.=2032.7 I ~ DRAINAGE 25' . EASEMENT I ~ N r ~ Ul ~ . w ( o ~ N I LD o N(D I or-o ~ . 0 ~z . w Z I~ w ~cn w = 60' ~ ¢ l~ . o G. SV,t,~~ i . o. oS, G 30891 STE~ 1 I ~~6 ~Og `N NAL ' EXPIRES 2-21-01 0 25 50 100 ~ i rv89'33'26"w SCALE: i 50' ~ 7035-208.DWG XREF: 70358ASE.OWG V: BK1-LT1 J ~ INDIVIDUAL LOT PLAN ~ METRO ENGINEERING, INC. SHELLEY ACRES ADDITION S. 324 SHERMAN LOT 1, BLOCK 1 SPOKANE, WA 99202 DRAWN 8Y: JKO (509) 624-9351 ~ DATE: 06/04/99 \ CHECKED BY: JGL I PROJECT No.: 97-035 ~ / Submittal Checklist ~ for Road & Drainage Projects in Spokane County - Plats/Short Plats This Submittal Checklist is to be completed and signed by the Sponsor's Engi»eer, and included with each plan submittal into the Spokane County Engineers Office. If this form is not fully completed and signed, do not submit plans and calculations to Spokane County for review and acceptance. Incomplete submittals will be returned and will cause unnecessary delays for your client. Project Name: e flel A c,.-~.s A &d , Pf~- / 773 -9~ Date: ~ ~f g ~y 7 Spokane County Project No. . Project Engineer: M e~~nq e e~'~,~n 3"lG"ge~ phone: 4 2- y- 935~ ~ Project Sponsor: ^ Go''~o'_"4l °ii . Phone: 92 2--3° o0 A. Preliminary Process Prior to Submittal of Road and Drainage Plans, the following events are to have already occurred: (By checking each item ofjrshown below, you are stating that you have verified these events/items have been completed.) Adoption of a Hearing Examiner's Report for tlus long plat, or a Planning Report for this short plat. At least one Pre-Design Meeting has been held with County staff at the Enoeers Office. An "Agreement to Pay Fces" has been signed by the project sponsor, and submitted to the County ~ Engineers Office. ML A Channelization Plan (e.g. signing and striping plan) of public roadway improvements, has been coordinated and discussed with the County Enoeers Office. , B. Road and Draioage Plan Submittal The items listed below are to be provided as a minimum with a road and drainage plan submittal. Additional inforcnation may be required to demonstrate that the plans meet all applicable standards. (By checking "yes" for each item shown below, you are verifying that these items have been completed and are included in this submittol. For any box checked "n/a a written justification oJ arry omissiorrs at the end oj this section is required.) Item Description Vhes . Road and drainage plans, two print sets. (Certification statement on cover of plans) IY Fes O n/a One set of plans on 24" x 36" mylar media, or CAD electronic fileyeDWG or .XF format 1V,yes Each Plan Sheet of record is signed and dated by the project sponsoZ: ~ 21 yes The road and drainage design meets the requirements of State law, WAC 196-27 regarding "conformity with accepted standards"; that is, the design reflects the "state of the practice" for the proposed concept. , ~ ye The plans, Drainage Report, basin map(s), and any other calculations are stamped, signed and dated by an engineer licensed in the State of Washin,gtoo. OV yes Q n/a Drainage Report, two sets. To include: basin map(s), time of coacentration routes in basin map, and Certification statement on cover of report and basin map. 0hes n/a Geotechnical Report, one set. (Include all soil test pit/boring logs.) 9 yes 0 nVZ Structural Pavement Calculations, one set 0 yes &Kn/a Cross-slope grade calculations for road widening projecis. i - Item Description ~ ye ~ ❑ n/a Maintenance Manual and Sinking Fund calculations for drainage facilities located outside of ~ County road rit-of-way. CRo ~i tia~- -R`~►q J-fo be ,v:~W 4~- ~'~,e d~ : yes 0 n/a Written explanation of who/what entity will be responsible for maintairung drainage facilities which are located outside of ublic road right-of-way, d that the plan is acceptable to the / County Engineers Office. t Se~ rna.., P~ yes 0 n/a Channelization Plan, or signing and striping information provided in the road plans. To be ~ included in road and drainage plan set. Vyes 0 n/a I have read the Hearing Examiner's Report (long plat), or Planning Dept. Findings and / Conditions (short plat), for this project. The design meets the conditions in the report. 0~s 5( n/a Copy of Approved Design Deviations. Cr~` /es 0 n/a Fire District Approval, for private roads. yes 0 nla Lot Plans. Required for any lots with draina.ge easements and which front a public road, or / for lots which receive and treat runoff from a public riot-of-way. yes 0 n/a Any applicable Staie and Federal pernuts have been obtained. (i.e. HPA, JARPA, etc.). For Permits with conditions, a copy of the permit and conditions are included in the plan submittal. 1, • yes Vgla Inspection Agreement between the sponsor and its engineer. 0 yes (9~ n/a For off-site easements to be grwted to Spokane County, the following items shall be Z included: legal description, exhibit, and proof of ownership. 0 yes 0` n/a Erosion Control Plaa, required for "Major Land-Disturbing Activity." To be included in the road and draiuage plan set. ( 5-~-~i~ d.4,~ -~C, /10~~ Y•►~(ude~ ~~c„ ~~..,~.e~,~~, 6o..,C,~ Explanation for any items listed above which are not included in this submittal: ~ (Note: an insufficient justificalion of why an item was not included in ihe submitted, or incomplete documenis, may result in the submittal being returned without review or without acxeptance. Provide attachments if necessary.) By signing below, the engineer is staiing thai the information provided in the submittal is complete, that the inforniation provided in the Submittal Checklist is accurate, and the plans and calculations are in accordance with the Spokane County Standards for Road & Sewer Construction, and the Guidelines for Stormwater Management, except where an approv Design Deviation allows otherwise. Engineer's Signature: Date: r~ r Engineer's Name: 4e 16,. Ze. c- (please print) , If there are any questions about this form or appropriate procedures, please call Development Services, Spokane County Public Works, at (509) 456-3600. For Spokane County Use Only Submittal No: County Plan Reviewer: 0 Accepted in for Review or Consiruction 11 Returned to the engineer without review and/or acceptance, See attached letter of explanation. Processing Date: Submittal Checklist 2 Spokane County Public Works; April 29, 1998 , - - ' - METRO ENGINEERING, INC-- - S. 324 Sherman LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ~ . Spokane, WA 99202 , - (509) 624-9351 Fax:-(509) 624-8153 ~ TO: ~ Date:. 06/18/99 . Job No: 91-035 - ~ - ~ . - Spokane County Engineers ~ Attention: Bill Hemmings, P.E. Re: Shelley Acres Addition ~ 1026 W. Broadway . . . . . ~ ~ -Spokane, WA-99260 ~ , . . . ~ WE ARE SENDING YOU: Attached ~ Under separate cover via the following items: _ ~Shop Drawings - Prints Plans . Samples ~ . Copy of L,etter . Change Order. _ ~ Specifications Mylar Copies D,ate ~ No. ( - Description l . . 1 Subrruttal Checklist 1 Drainage Report . ~ ~ . . ~ - 1 ~ 1 Pavement Design 1 ~ Street and Drainage Plans (Blueprints) and, ACAD File ~ ,1 Draft Operation and Ma.intenance Manual ~ 1 ~ 4 Individual Lot Plans RECE'VEDTHESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED .BELOW: - i U N 1$ 1999 ' ~ ~ , • - SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER , X For approval ~ .~Approveti as submitted - Resubmit copies for approval ~ ~ For your use . Approved as noted Submit ' copies for distribution ~ - As requested Returned for correction Return conected prints ~ - For review and comment ~ For bids due Prints returned after loan to us ~ ' . . , COMMENTS: ~ ~ - • - " ~ ~ - If you have any questions please call.. Thank you! ~ . . . , . _ COPY TO: Bill Main, Jr.; Main Corporation SIGNED: . ~ - - . - . - J .Lee,P. ~ . . - . . . - , , . ~ • , ~ Pre-Design Meeting Notes Spokane County Engineers Office Project Name: Project Number: ~h 7.~ Project Sponsor: Sponsor's Engineer: Design Firm: 1~~i Pax-> Engineer:~~"L. Meeting Date: 1. 8' Meeting Time: ~ p A County Sta.ffPresent at Meeting: _Zoce~, Other Meeting Attendees: naine/representing name/representing name/represeneing name/representing The Following Ttems need to be Discussed w/ the Design Engineer General Items 1 a. List certain special requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval, EIS, or MDNS. This is not an all-inclusive list. The Engineer and Sponsor is responsible for adhering to all Conditions and design criteria. descriptioit reference dcscription reference 12 description reference ~ / .2O description reference 1b. Does the Engineer have a copy of the Examiner's/Staff Conditions of Approval? 3 2. 7nclude Standard Plan notes in the Road and Drainage Plans. Pre-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 2 Spokane County Public Works Road Plans l. Road Classifications and Design Criteria. ; #1 #2 #3 #4 Street Name Classification L.A. . ~ , _--__....W~..__~~. Roadway Width, W 5~' c~Cv t 11 ~ 7-6 ~ • • Minimum right-of-way width see note (1) C~ l~ C:> v H - ~ Min. Horiz. Curve w/ super ` t i , ~ Nlin. Horiz. Curve w/o super . ~ General Land Slope/Terrain s :Design Speed, mph ~ , t t Curb Type & Clear Zone (see Sec. 3.15) a ~ Sidewalk required? (yes/no) /00 Note (1) Additional right-of-way may be given by the Sponsor. Discussion: ' 2. According to the Design Engineer, what is the maximum number of units which will have access from a single roadway? . What is the max. allowed per Sec.1.03?e2~:- 3. Minimum intersection spacing is 300' for along a Principal or Minor Arterial (per Sec. 3.04), and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street. What spacing is provided for this project? ~ , Prc-Design Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 3 Spokane County Public Works 4. Are any off-site slope easements needed, or off-site right-of-way acquisitions needed? If so, describe. ~~o.•~ ~e. r ~ ti./1~-~-. 5. What type of turn-arounds are needed? (i.e. cul-de-sac, hammerhead, etc.) Street Name Turn-around Type Location ca* S ~•Ju5 6. Road Surfacing Requirements (Sec. 3.16) a) What method in determining road surfacing requirements does the Design Engineer propose to use (i.e. AASHTO Design Method, County thickness table, or other)? ~ - ~Lrcc b) Provide the Design Engr. a copy of the Soil Sample Procedures, Design Report Format & Alternate Pavement Design Table. 7. Does the Engineer plan on applying for any Design Deviations? If so, briefly describe below. Please note that approval of all Design Deviation's must be obtained prior to construction plan submittal. Storm Drainage l. Basin Map a) Did the Design Engineer bring to the meeting a basin map? If so, does the basin map show topography and sufficient information to be useful? b) Does the basin map depict any contributing off-site runoff flowing onto the property? !F~~ Does it appear to be correct?,1AF_5. If not, explain. c) Is a site visit needed to verify the basin limits? Schedule for: . {Note: Concurrence with County Eilgineer's on basin limits is required prior to plan submittal. } 2. Is the site located within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? . What type of water quality treatment is proposed by the Design Engineer? Si ^ L Fre-Uesign Meeting Nates For Praject:: Page: 4 Sp0kLTl~ Coli]lt.Y PllblIC WoI`k-S 3, What subsurface inves#igatiorrs, if any, are needed VA'th this praject to rnake sure the proposed disposal process will.functivn as planned. _ 4e 4. Are there dawnstream conditions which will affect the design of drainage facilities. If so describe possible mitigative measures. It-)6 . 5. Is mai-ntenance access pravided to each GPA swale or drainage pond? Yf there is somethin, unusual, what r-equixements were given to the Design F-ngr.? 6 What does the Dev+eloperlEngr. propose for providing for perpetual maintenance of the drainage facilities? Please briefly describe prapased mechanism, and what is needed to accomplish this. ' 7a. What Design Starm(s) should be used in the course ofanalysis (i_e. 10-yr, 50-yr, etc.). 7b. Is a Detention or Retention systern proposed? Plea.se describe. 02G:5? '_~--e~ 8. Are :Erosion Cantrol M.easures required with this project? If sa, bri~fly describe applica.ble requiretnents. ~ ~ . 9. Is a second Pre-Design Meeting needed? ~ . Pre-Desigii Meeting Notes for Project: Page: 5 Spokane Counry Public Works List of Documents Provided to the Sponsor's Engineer: a) b) c) d) e) Any ea,sement.s needed outside of the plat boundary, for• drainage or other, ar•e to be acquired pr•ior• to road and draincrge plan submittal.. The S'pansay or Spvnsvr's Engineer• shall pj•ovide separ•ately . a legal descyiption and litle Commitment (or- similar• proof vf ownershrp) of'the affected parcel(s) for propo.sed easement.s. The S'uhnzittcr.l Checklist, completed artd signed hy the Sporlsor•'s Fngineer•, shaT.l be pi-ovid.ed with each plan submittal. Note: Provide a copy of this completetl clocume`zt to tlte Design Engineer rct the end of the pre- design meeting. filenamc:PreDesign mceting ~ J SHELLEY ACRES ADDITION, ~ DRAINAGE REPORT - Project No. 97-035 June 17, 1999 aASXf~ ~ 0 ~ Q 3089 1 1348~ ~ssloNAL , - EXPIRE8 2/211a, - ' ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: The design improvements shown in this set of calculations conform to the applicable , editions of the Spokane County Standards For Road And Sewer Constriiction and the Spokane County C'ruidelines For Stormwater Mcmagement. All design deviations have been approved by the Spokane County Engineer. I approve these calculations. Prepared By: Metro Engineering, InG pFFIC►AL FUBLie D4CUMENT S. 324 Sherman St. SpOKANE ('dflUNTY ENGINE-ER'S OFFtCE Spokane, WA 99202 OR ~ . t Ph.. (509) 624-9351 PROJECT# Fax: (509) 624-8153 SUBMITTAL # ~ RETURN TO COUNTY ENGINEER DRAINAGE REPORT Project DescriQtion The project is Shelley Acres Addition, a proposed thirteen (13) lot plat, located in the Spokane Valley. The lots will be approximately an acre in size. The project will consist of one (1) public street (Steen Court) and one (1) private drive (Courtney Lane). Steen Court will be an extension of 12~' Avenue. Please reference the on-site drainage basin map, which follows on page B-1, and the design plans. Drainage Calcutations Offsite Drainage . There are two (2) offsite drainage basins, labeled A and B(see page A-1). The offsite flows will be intercepted by ditches that will run along the south and east perimeters of the plat. Offsite drainage flow was calculated using the SCS TR-55 Method. A 50-year ~ storm event was used for the calculation of runoff. The offsite flow is relatively small. The calculations for sizing the offsite interception ditches are included in the report (see ~ I . page A-11 thru A-18) ~ On-Site Drainage The project urill have five (5) on-site drainage basins (see page B-1). The drainage basins will drain to standard `208' ponds. Stormwater will infiltrate out of the ponds. Larger storm events will overflow into the drywells for discharge. The ponds were sized using the Rational and Bowstring methods, with a 10 yr. storm event. Calculations for sizing the `208' ponds and drywells are included in the report. The site is located in Gamson and Phoebe soils per the SCS soils survey (see the soils map ~ located on page B-2), therefore, the use of standard drywells will be allowed. . The drainage from the streets will be intercepted by curb inlets or catch basins. The calculations for sizing the inlets, grate and storm sewer line are included in the report. ~ OFFS~ ~ r ~ j°~~ • w~~' ~.3 a x64 ,r~,~"'~~.'~ • - - ~ ~ t ~ • ~ . ~ ~z . . ~ • ~ ~ ' , ` - • . • ~ r;k;y . . , xoo . f ~ . ` - ~ i ~ . ~ { . " ♦ . , M * ~ ` . . ' ~ t t ' ' ~ ~ _ ~ • • ` • 01 °D 3 ~ • ' , , . ~ M 3t ~ , j. ~ - • ♦ 1` ~ ~ ~ ~ •ti ~ ~ 1 ~ ~4 1 ~ x~Z . , rit ~ •'b••f f ~ ~ ~ • ' •'t . ' . ti ~ . . qiw i • t . ! - . . tt ~ . ; . . , ; . , ; - ' • ~ ~ ' , „ 4e i • - . . ' , r • ~ ! ~ o° . , . , . G . Qw ' r T;EI o . o P,.S ~ - ! ~ • "r . ~ SPOKAN E COU NTY, WA'H I NGTON - R. 44 E. ~ R. 45 E. • h~ ~ ~ ; s ` _ a• i.~^ ~A, o v ' > ! ~.X4 ' ' "~t. <d' • , ~ ' ~ i. - I ;~~i+. : , ; , S ` ~ s r► ~ - r.` ' t. ~ r ~ 'Y `'t " ..s~'`~ ~ e ~ r~ ' : 5 ~ ~ . • ~ :f , t~.c+~! "t6>' . : ~ ' t ,;i; y`" ~ 'si~,i ~ A d„ i„ ♦~~~~e ~ ~ ' ~3! b - ~ K•~' ~ IG ry't.,' 't d. ' ~ x,~~r; w i:.~:;X~ ,$'J,.°•3, . y. ~ q 'KL~~• y ~ y ~;~:~,..~f' 4" 3 AGl .~T ~ . ~ ~ • . ~'t~',y ~ ~ • ° ~ [~~^y . ti.3 ~ L . , F ff g , T. Y. T•~ ' CS ` ` ~ ~ ~ • • N. • • ~ y+ j' ~ .~~2 ,y~~~• i:' , Y ~ V , . ~y fJ . , ~~:n`~ ^ ~ 6 Y?v ~<r ~ • .P Z M..o-, . . ' . ~'r r . . . . •t, , .1~.^e'r ~f~~t, w4,•. ,..t~~,3!1NyI,: ~ w. f ' ' Aa " ~ > . • ' v ' ?,c`': ~/~wt „j„' r " ' • . ' - s ~ t •''P- . t.`^ a ,c,>».a:3 ' 1`.a~'^L,w C vf v y ~ ; , d.:«^ Y , ~ ~•rs• ~'t Ng ~ ~i P~ ~ b;.~C+i~t' . ~ , ~ ^?~°(<~S ~ .~~,~Zk•. ~ "t;~<•~. ~?t,.t"-'Y. ~ ~j :'~t: ~ 2, ~ , e . • ' ~ ~ ' a ~~;i.~~ :j'~'~. m g . ! ~ ' , ' • iCD ' ~ _ ' ~ . ~ i P' , ♦ ~ ~ d i ' s ; ; . . , , ~ ' • 1C I~ , . . . . • f` . , ' i. . : , . • ke . .6- 14 ` ~ • _ ~ , ~ , , ~ . . ` / 4 ~ s~ w~ , , s s . • ~ ~1 : ` , ; . ' ~ N../ ^ ~ ` ~ ; •.y. i.:R. S$~ ; • ~ J • Pt~'~r ~ ~ ` ~,~C +E. ~ ' ~ `^'~x'. • :'o~~r~~3i'.•y ~ - .~'y~ ~ k' ~ <a~ , ?r • ~ :,~i ' ~ ~ s,~' 1 ~~a t 24' + ~ ~ ~ ~ °~fl• ~ ' • . ~s- . ~ ~ r:~en~ral Valley ` y `e Y'~~~ ~ " ,"C . p A~ ~ i~~~ •q~~ " . ~ ~ wCh0 Ol ~'•y_ i ,e~. _ :h 4 # ~ . a4'... p~ ~ • • Fti" ~ ~ r• ~ x - ~.~'Y~ ~~4~^~ ~ ~ . .~a t~`.S.' n ~Or'.'Ai ~k . • T~ ~ ~ .Y ~♦w . , ~ ~ - ";b~z~ ' . ~3,~ ,ti<. S. ' f2;• ' . 'O S ' .~~;:'tt.y. •.y • '~3'*t^. RN • ; r . , .r . c.'' . ~`3~:. . ' :.a~• ;~~,j 9 ,F„~y • o ' . :~4~ V,. ~ y. ' ~ - ' • - ~.y;Hf~~ ^ . . y~9"'. ` ~ ~r•~.y .r: A . , ' Y -a:"~ - ~ r ,a°.~ r.~''.. ' • . ~ ~ - • . .'f~'~f ~,w>>~• c~--'y ' ' ♦ . ! ~ i Jg " ,.:9~"" f • : K 3 . ~i• ' ' '~`a. •a ' i ' - ~ A~ r~^s~; • ,~i ~x~ w . .,as . ~ v¢ X - "'~;.~~~;fv • ~ ~xti„ 3.a- ~ HS ~~dt+rfs• . ' `l•~M~~ . 1.?'.~£'~ ' ~ ~`~~in ~ :5. t ~t':~,,,,,~~ ' ~ ` . , ~ T • V' -v%^zi y~`3~w'~ c^ r~eti. ~;~.45! .y'• ..f~7 ' f ~ ' - . ~ x ; . 74~~ ti W ~~,3T~'•S•S :`,¢'r°' `i ~•.t. f~ . • ,C ' f i ~ ~ ~ 5 x f: a..,~~';''~ ~"'~Y'~•i. . \rVV \/1 ,,~a~,"'~ + < . .'1 .S.>>' •;`,~~~.rE~ ' . 7 ~~r~",. UhV PSA ~ . , ~ A • ♦ . l ~~Ci{ ~ •~~V ~,,~5 <~~~;^Q~. ~r ~ ' ' . ✓ ' . M~s.,~ ,~,kq ' `~a;,,F . _ i;~~ .~x.- , . • . , , ; - , x .$y~~e~;{ ; ~i- ' A~" ~ ~2~i0 ' `y~ . ' ' : . . ~ i ~ 'S , `4~~a..4" ~~'•l, S ~ . ~r.R~ ~ • ~o:.~ 'i;rn '4i2°ta~ ~S : ~ ~~~~Y . ~ • , v , , L aB V f/ Y~jS ~ J~• x•~ -+7et~°~ • ~ ~-~j` is` , • 'y'itr i B • r . y~?' ~7►,'y~ ti"& UhV • i~"' Y ~ ~E ' :~wz*: 4"~ s .tr ~ \ . ~ ' ' _ r ; ; . • , . . .N~\ • B k Cp 8 \ • p`A ~ ~iY. ! _gA~\ M o z, f8 7, . Bf~ SOILS " tB . " , . ~ . ~ " • . . . MAP A-2. R c R - • _ . ?~ii1l M = t 11~.-~~`.~rt ~ _ A►S~ A Si~~, B pFF I . ~ - . V Quick TR-55 Ver.5.46 S/N: ' Executed: 13:35:29 06-03-1999 ' Of f site Basin A RUNOFF CURVE NUMBER DATA . . . Composite Area: AREA CN SURFACE DESCRIPTION (acres) ~o~r-- - Forrest (medium stand) q A 3.21 35 Forrest (medium stand) T'y~e! B 7.49 60 COMPOSITE AREA 10.70 52.5 ( 53 , ' / I Quick TR-55 Ver.5.46 S/N: Executed: 13:51:19 06-03-1999 shelle_y\BASIN A..TCT Tc calc f.or Basin A ' TC COMPUTATIONS FOR: SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manninq'_s roughness coeff., n 0.4000 Flow length, L(total < or = 300) ft 200.0 Tao-yr 24-hr rainfall, p2 in ~.400 Land slope, s ft/ft 0.1500 0.8 .007 * (n*L) T = hzs_ 0.42 = 0.42 0.5 0.4 P2 * S . SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID Surf ace (paved, or VnpavecU ? UnRaved - _ Flow length, L - ft 1800.0 . Watercourse slope, s ft/ft Q.1400 0.5 Avg. V = Qs f* (s l f t,( s 6.0370 , where: Unpaved Csf = 16.1345 Paved Caf = 20.3282 T= L /(3600*V) hrs 0.08 = 0.08 CHANNEL- FLOW ' Segment ID CrQss Sectional F1,ow Area, _ a sq.ft 0.00 Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0.00 ' Hydraulic radius, z= a/Pw ft Q..000 Channel slope, s ft/ft 0.0000 Manning's roughness coeff., n 0,0000 , 2/3 1/2 1.49 * r V = ft/s 0.0000 n Flow lerlgth, L, f t 0 T= L/ (3600*V) hrs 0.00 = 0.00 • . : TOTAL T3NiE ('hrs T Q: 5 0 . ~ -s Quick TR-55 Version: 5.46 S/N: Page 1 Return Freguency: 50 years TR-55 TABULAR HYDROGR.APH METHOD - Type II. Distribution (24 hr. Duration Stonn) ~ Fxecuted: 06-03-1999 13:51:39 Watershed file: SHELLEY\BASIN A MOP ~ Hydrograph file: SHELLEY\BASIN A.HYD Offsite Basin A Input Parameters Used to Compute Hxdrograph U-Subarea AREA CN- Tc - - gt- - Prec~ig. ~ Runof f-- - Fa~p Descript ion (acres ) _ (hrs Chrs ) . . ( in) _ . (in) -input/used r0-Te.ao 53.e 0:50 0.00 , Z:s-o F 0.11 1.63 - .so * Traver t-ime f-rom subarea- outfall- tro composite- wate-rshed au-tfa~l1-point. I-- Subarea where user specified interpolation-between Ialp tables.. Total area = 1070.00 acreq or 1.6719 sq.mi Peak discharge = 42 cf s=p p-` p, yZ c-FS Computer Modifications of Input Parameters Input Values Rounded- Values - Ia/-p Subarea Tc * Tt Tc * Tt Interpolated 'Ia/p Description (hr) (hrZ (hr) (hr) (Yes/No) Messages 0 . 50 Q . " No ~ Eontputed fa/p,> .5 ~ * Travel time from subarea outfa:11- to comgosite watershed outfall point. Tc & Tt are available in the hxdXograph tables. /`1"~0 v O-Fvs I ~ ~ QulCk rl'R-55 VE.'r.5.46 SIN; t ExeGllted: 13:47:36 06=03-1999 . Offsite baszn B RLTNOFF CURVE N[JNlBER DA"TA . . . ..............~..............................................o~,.. Composi t e Area : _ ~ AREA CN SURFA,CE DESCRIPTION (acres) Fnrres~ (medium'stand) 'Iype B 1.20 60 , ~ . . . . . . . . . . , cOMpOs rTE AREA r - _ > 1.20 60.0 4 60 - } 4 # f i i ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ • i • Y Y Y ~ • 1 • ~ . ' A-8 . ' Quick TR-55 Ver.5.46 S/N: , Executed: 13:46:23 06-03-1999 shelley\BASIN B.TCT Offsite basin 8 Tc COMPUTATIONS FOR: SHEET FLOW (Applicable to Tc only) Segment ID Surface description Manning's roughness coeff., n 0.4000 Flow length, L(total < or = 300) ft 100.0 T~vo-yr 24-hr rainfall, P2 : in 1.400 Land slope, s ft/ft 0.2DOD 0.8 . .007 * (n*L) T = hrs 0.22 = 0.22 0.5 0.4 ` P2 * s SHALLOW .C.ONCEN'I'kATED FLDSq Segment ID Surface (paved or unpaved).? Unpaved Flow length, L ft '100.0 Watercourse slope, s ft/ft 0.2000 0.5 Avg.V - Csf * (s) ft/s 7.2156 ~ where : Unpaved Csf = 16.1345 Paved Csf = 20.3282 T = L / (3600*V) hrs 0.00 10.-00 CHLANNEL FLOW ~ Segment ID Cross Sectional Flow Area, a sq.ft 0.00 Wetted perimeter, Pw ft 0.00 ' Hydraulic radius, r= a/Pw ft 0.000 Channel slope, s ft/ft 0.0000 Manning's roughness coeff., n 0.0000 .2/3 1/2 1.49 * r * s V = ft/s 0.0000 n Flow length, L ft 0 T= L/ (3600*V) hrs 0.00 = 0.00 ; ; ; • . . TOTAL TIME (hrs) 0.22 ✓ . A- 1 Y Quick TR-55 Version: 5.46 S/N: Page 1 Return Frequency; 50 years TR-55 TABULAR HYDROGRAPH METHOD Type II. Distribution ~ (24 hr. Duration Storm) EXQcuted: 06-03-1999 13:49:59 Watershed file: SHELLEY\BASINB MOP Hydrograph file: SHELLEY\BASIN B.HYD Offsite Basin B ' - Input Par4meters Used to Compute Hxdrogra2h t--Subarea AREA CN Tc * Tt Precip. Runoff Ia/p Description (,acres,) (hrs) (hrs) (in) ` Cin) input/used 120.00 601-.0 0.20 *.00 ~ g.ao ~ ~ e.26 17.4~s :48 * Travel t ime f rom subarea out-f a3 l t-o compos ite watershed- out f-al l pcrirrt ~ I-- Subarea where user specified interpolation between Ia/p tables. Total area = 12'*0:00 acres or 0.1875 sq.mi . Peak di's charge = 20 c f s ' v C~S . lO o = D- 2 Computer Modifications of Input Parameters 1`nput Va•lues - Rotiaded-Valnes I-a/p- . Subarea Tc * Tt Tc * Tt Znterpolated Za/p Description (hr) (hr) (hr) (hr) (Yes/No) Messages 0-. 22- 6- . 8 0 0.20 0. 6 0-- Ye s- * Traver timer f rom subarea out-fa31 to- comrpasit~e- wa~tershed- out-f a-1 I go-int. ~ A- (0 ~ ~~~~~~E INTERCEPTION DITCH CALCULATIONS ~ . ~ - ~ A-11 Triangular Channei Anaiysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Comment : Intercept ion -Di,.tch. - praining. Bas in A (54,,4--',,, (1 ~ tS• e3~ t o 7+00) Solve ForDepth Given Input Data: . Left Side Slope,, 2,00;1 CH:V) Right Side Slope. -2. 00 :1 (H : V) Marining' s n. . . Q ,.Q26 Channel 'Slope . . . . 0 .1842-ft/f t~ S ~,~~5 a ~fa Pi&.Charge._~• k Q,42 cfs ~i,Co.,tc-~..~~►~%ve -~S ~ ~aS' n f~ Computed Results : .Fv rl9 Pe-P.th-• QI2I ft o~~•~,'+y I f~ velocity . . . . . . . . . 4.-99 -fps 4v • E1-Qw Are-a_. Q.,Q8 sf Flow Top Width. . . '0.-82 ft O K - le ss ~c ~ S~PS • Ppri mPt Pr 0.2? f t - Critical "Depth. . . ' 0 . 3 1-ft Qriti`cal S1Qpe, ~ 0._Q214 f_t/ft Froude Number.... '2.75 (flow is-Supercr'itical-) ~ ~ . Qp-ejl~ Qbannel FI.Qw Kodul.e, Version. 3..11 Cc.) .1990 Haestad Methods, Inq. * 37 Brookside Rd *-Waterbury, Ct 06708 A-J7 Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow ~ Worksheet Name: CommeLLt * ItitexCeption DitCh - Draining Basin B(S~4APAP, $4-9~ /y + z8 Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Lef t Si.~e S-lope. 2 . 00 :1 (H : v) Right Side Slope. 2.00:1 (H:V) Manning' s n...... O...026 Channel Slope.... 0.2500 ft/ftt Discharge........ 0.20 cfs Computed Results: Depth . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 L5 f t Velocity 4.65 fps L S-~ps 0 0,. Q 4 s f ~ Flow Top Width... 0.59 ft W2t-t-eLL PPri mPt Pr - 0. _.6.6 f t Critical Depth... 0.-23 ft Critical SlopLe..._. 0._.Q236 ft/ft Froude Number.... . 3.02 -(flow--is Supercritical) ~ l,rDs;D /i Y1+G~ N1'iI b(? l.l.Sed Sl oPPs e>et!F'd_ /0 '0J. ~ ~ OR~~ Claann-el Flo_w Module, Versian 3.11 (c) 1_990 Haestad Methods t- Inc.* 37 Brookside Rd Waterbury,, Ct 067-08 13. V ~ Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Comment : Interception Ditch - Draining Basin B~5-~-a~;o~ 7foo +0 8~9Y Solve For Depth Given Input. pata : I~ef-t &icle Slope . . . 2 . QQ ;.1 (H : v) Right Side Slope. 2. 00.:1 (H : V) Manning's n. . . 0,.026 ~ , Channel Slope.... 0.2800 ft/ft g. 0. 2 0_ c f s >~,o•,s~,.,/a ~'fie~ Dbes #1o4- . Computed Results: pepth . ~ . _ 0 ,1,4 f t a K velocity . . . . . . . . . 4.85 fps 4S f'ps Flow Area . . . . . . . . 0.: 0.4 sf Flow Top Width . . . -0 . 57: ft Wetted Perimeter,- Q_Ez.4 f t Critical Depth... '0.-23 ft Critical Slope.. . O..Q236 ft/,ft Froude -Number 3.1-9 ( f 1 ow is Supercrit i cai ) ~c 6cse' ~ Slur PS ex<P,-d /o , ' Qpe-n Channe-I Fjow MQdule,,. Version 3..11 1990 Haeqtad Methods,,. Iur,.. * 3.7.Brookside Rd.* ,Waterbury,. Ct 0-6708 . A-~~ . v ~ H~'I E CU. • - - - • - - - . . r . c- f;~,.ri 1~.~.~ ~::~,fc r►~Q. ~aA~.rc~~ ~~~d .r~ r8, ~R ~ Z. • 7 • 1 A (A) Exhibit 7-3; !'ermissible velocity for vageiation-lines waterways and oUtlets. 1/ (wAShington State Supplemcnt) - 1:ros lon ~ F,rosion rest.stunt susceptible . . S1oPe?~ soils sails Cover " rr~~e "K" less than .31 areater than .33 tMsec) M7 s e c . ) bentgrass-I 0-5 8 6 mcadow foxteil 5-30 7 S- - creeping foxtail over 10 6 4• ^ chewings, red, herd and sheep ~y fescues ~ Kentucky bluegrass . ~ smooth brome p_S . 7 S ~ tall fescue 5•10 6 q -p timathy , over 10 Q6 orchardgre'ss k ~ pube9cent, ntermediete.,N tN.,4~wl vK~-~- abv~-e, thickspike, streamban~ , . , reed canarygrass 0-5 3` S `-'5-10 q 3 , ~ crested wheatgrass . Siberian wheatgrass r ~ perennial ryegrass 3 ' annual ryegrass a/ 0-5- 3,5 2,g sudangra9s 4/ . small grains d/ , . t ' w 1/ Use velocities exceeding S feet per second only rrhere good,stands and praper mainteriance can be obtained.. , 1/ Do not use on slopes steeper thnn 10 percent except for revegetated side slopes in combination with n stone or concrete center section, 3! po not use on slopes steeper than S percent except'for vegetated side slopes in combination with a stone, concrete, or hi.ghly resistant vagetative center section. 4/ Annuals--use on less than S Percent slopes or as temporary cover until ~ permanent cover is established. . - l~ ~ -3- ~ ~ WIND SOIL SURFACE :SLOPE :CAP. :EROD. SYMBOL ~ SOIL NAME ~ TEXTURE :RANGE :NIRR ~ K~ T:GROUP GgA ;GARRISON ;GR-L ; 0- 5: 3S : 0.17; 2: 6 G96 :GARRISON ;GR-L ~ 5-20: 3E : 0.17: 2: 6 Gm8 ;GARRISON :GRV-L ; 0- 8; 3E : 0.15: 2; 7 GnB ; GARR I SON :STV-L ~ 0-20: 6S : 0. 10 : 2: 7 GpA ;GLENROSE ;SII. ~ 0- 5: 2C : 0.32: 5: 5 G p6 ; GI.ENROSE :S I L ~ 5-241; 3E : 0. 32 : 5: 5 GpC :GLENROSE :SIL ; 20-30: 4E ; 0.32: 5: 5 GpD :GLENROSE :SII. : 30-40: 6E : 0.32: 5: 5 GpD :GLENROSE :SIL ~ 40-55; 7E ; 0.32: 5: 5 rr6 ;GLENROSE ;GR-SIL ~ 5-20: 3E : 0.24: 5: 6 Gr0 ;GLENROSE :GR-SIL ~ 30-40: 6E : 0.24: 5; 6 Gr0 ;GLENROSE :GR-SIL ~ 40-55: 7E : 0.24: 5: 6 G s D ; GLENROSE ; ST-S I L : 20-40: 6E : 0. 32 : 5:- 6 GsD :GLENROSE :ST-SIL : 40-55; 7E : 0.32: S: 6 G tA ; GREEN BLUFF - ':S I L ~ 0- 5: 2C ; 0. 32 : 5; 5 G t6 :GREEN BLUFF :S I L ~ 5-20 ; 3E : 0. 3z : 5: 5 ~ Hf C ; HAGEN :LFS ~ 0_30 : 4E : ~1. 32 : 5: 2 Hg8 :HAGEN :SL ~ 0 20: 3E : 0.24: 3: 3 -#4 HhA ; HAROESTY ; SJ-L ~ 0- 5 ; 2W : 0. 43 : 5 : 5 *ItNmA :HAROESTY ;S I L 0- 5; 3S : 41. 43 : 2: 5 HnB :HESSELTINE :SIL ~ 0-10: 3E ; 0.37: 2: 5 H oB :HESSELT I NE ~ S I L ; 0- 8; 3E - : 0. 37 ; 2: 5 Nr6 :HESSELTINE :GR-SIL ~ 0-10: 3E : 0 24: 2; 6 H sB : HESSELT I NE :ST-S I L ~ 0-20 : 4S VQf . 24'; 2: E 44 H tB :HESSELT I NE ; ST-S I L ~ 0- 6; 6S 24 : 2: 6 Ht6 :HESSELTINE :SIL . ~ 0- S: 6E : 0.32: 2: S 44HvC :HESSELTINE :SIL ~ 0-10: 6E : 0.32: 2: 5 *-WHvC , ; ROCKLY . :STX-L ~ 2-30: 7S : 0. 10 : 1; 8 HvD. ;HESSELTINE :SIL ; 30-50; 7E : 0.32: 2; 5 HvD :ROCK OUTCROP ;UWB : 30-50: 6S ~ HvD :ROCKLY ;STX-L : 30-55; 7S ; 0.10: 1: 8 44HxC :ROCK'OUTCROP :UWB ; 0-341; BS 4*HxC :ROCKLY :STX-L ~ 2-30 : 7S ; 0. 141 : 1 ; 8 t*H xC :HESSELT I NE :S I L ; 0-1 Q1 : 6E ~ 0. 32 : 2: 5 -t-Y Kc :KONNER ; S I CL ~ 0- 2: 6W ~ 0. 28 ; 5; 7 iCiVKd ; K(1NNER, DRA I NED :S I CL ~ 0- . 2: 3W :'0. 28 ; 5: ? ~ LaB :LAKESOL :SII. ; 2-20; 3E ; -0 ..32~ 5; 5 L aD :LAKESOL - :S I L ; 341-40 : 6E ~ . ' 5. . 5 La0 :LAKESOL :SIL ; 40-55: 7E ; .3 V, 5; 5 LeA :LAKETON :SIL ; 0- 5; 2E ~0.37; 5; 5 Le8 :LAKETON :SIL ; 5-20: 3E ~0.37: 5; 5 LfA ;LAKETON :FSL ;0- 5: 2E ~0.32: 5; 3 LmC :LANCE :SIL ~ 0-30: 4E ~ 0.55: 5; 4L LmC3 ;LANCE ;SIL ~ 0-30: 4E ~ 0.55;* 5: 4L LnA?_ :LARKIN :SIL ~ 0- 5: 2C ~ 0.32 : 5; ' Ln82 :LARKIN :SIL ~ 5-20: 4E ~ 0.32; 5: Ln02 :LARKIN ;SIL : 20-30: 6E ~ 0.32; 5; LnD2 :LARKIN :SIL : 30-45: 6E ~ 0.32: 5: , • L t :LATAH :S I L ~ QS- 3: 6W ; Q) . 32 : 5: 6 f~,et/ 114 ve 1' lit~,E~f ~ 3- 8G ~di~t~c ' 1NGt ~lliv,v'~' 4/- 86 Co - y8 !4_ WIND . ~GROup ~ , SLppE , NIRR ~ , R A~GE Cpp 4 SURFA T y~TURE ' 0 'Zo 51, E , q~ , Z ~ ~ 4E ~ ' 24S, ~ ~ : 3 0_30 50JL -34~ . 0, 24% , 5 SYMgOL 0 _ ~E ' 37 ~ 5~ 5 • MARgLE ' ~'co S ' 0 ; W ' 0 , 0, 37 ~ 2 ~ 5 b Z 30: Z4E ~,0.37 ' 2; 5 M aC ~ MARgLE V AR I AST IL _ E . , _4E 0.37 5 I MARB ' 4 t4ONppV I S~L ~~-55 ~ 7E ; W • 37; 5 , d , MascOW S 6E 5 MmC ~ 05CpW S Z ~ 0 ~ ~ 6E ; ~ . 37 % S ~ Mmp I M ; t- - : 30 os _55 ; 7 E ; 0, 37 % 1 • . m~ ; M gCW aW . . ~ L ~ 4~ M°C Mvsc°W - ~-34~ ~ 8s ~ g)•37 MoO ; MOSC~~ T 31 ~-65 ! . g5 ; 5.4 6 - MOO . ; MOS~ cROP , L , 30-65 ~S .37 ; ~ - MsC -RpCK W ; ~W ; o_ 5 % ZC ; 0~}.3'~ ; 5 ; 6 B 2 M 5~ ; MOSK ~V.~CRflp SZL 5 ; , 37 s 5 3E ; 3? ~ M RpC , ~,~L , 5_~5► 0. ! { F MSE ; NAFF 30 4E ` 0. 37 ~ ; 6 NaA ~ NpFF ; SIL ; 1 5_30% 4E. ~ 00 ~7 ' 55 ; fi NaA2 ; %AFF ~ SI~,. ~~y-15 ~ ~E ; 0.37s 6 , NaC ' NA FF . .5I~' ' 15__34~45, ~ 6E 1 ; ~y,37% ~ + NaC2 ~ NpFF ;SI` ; 30~_ 5 ~ ~W ; Q~ .3~ ; s % ; . NaC3 NAFF 51~" _ 5; 3E`E 0 ,37 5 1, 2r._24~ : ~ ~ ~ ,37 ~ ~5 ' IyaG3 ~ NpFf E SY,. J Naa2 ; NARCI's E 'IL ~ 5_2q~ % 3E 0, e~3 ~ Z. 5 N~~ PE RCE - ; SIL ; 0,20% ; 4E . ; 0. 43 s , 5' s A , ~ 32 PE 6 NP , NEZ ERCE , SIL , ZQ~-3~ ~ 3E ; • , 5; N PB NEZ P - 15 ~ . ; {~'32 ~ , 5 E N P83 ; p a~~~~' ~-3~ ~ aE p aB , PaLQUSE '~Z~' 15 _30 ; 4E , S 1 • 4~ F' a CZ P aLaU SE g~i 1.,, 4 2--34~ $S . r; 3~ Z; $ PA LpuSE 0,30' ?E ~ ~ 4~.4 1 gbC2 ' C , P A ~ UWB , 3Q~ -65 ~ ? s ; ~ • ~ ~ P GC '~ROc LK ~VTCR~P ' SIt" _ i' ~J ~ $s ~ .37 ' S : 15 5 ~ R gv L ' 3~ ~ 0 • P~C ; ppLOUSE ',CB , 0- 5', 4W 3 ~ ~d✓~~';~~ P aE ; RQCKLY ' UW ` 5~ 3W K ~uT CROP ; s I 1.. ' _ 5~ ZE , 0.2 4 FJ pCE '•Ro pNE ED ' SIL ~ 0 o ~ ~ .37 ~ 3r; 6 ~PeA PE pRAIN 0_ 6 ~P 5; ZC 0,37 ~ 3 ~4 ~PEpNE~ BE • ~L ~ 3E 3 oA PHaE -20-, , Q~ . 3 4 , 3; 6 p s A . ;PHpEBE ~-2{~ ; 3E 0. 37' 8 . Psg S RF-ARppN 3~ 4E . , N ~SIL ~ 2o- 1SW RdA ►REARDA _ 3, ~ R dS . 3 ; REAROAN GRy -Cas 0-60 1a5 4 ; QS . 32 3 ; 5 ~N 5 RdB2 aEARa R dGZ : ~JERW~`SH :'~WB ; +~-2~~ ; 3~ ; ~ • 3Z`~ ~ ; ~Rh ; RpCK OuTCROP ' SIL ' ~ 34~,~ 4E 0 . a~,fi ~ 3 r $ G R o sCNUMa~H ER ; s I1- ; 2~ 1 J Sag .SCHVMa lo c SI ' _~lg SaB2 ~SCHUMACHER l~ S aC " Gu/S✓ klYOR/c ■ „ W4 r ' -5 . ~ WINO SOIL ; : SURFACE :SLOPE :CAP. ; ; ;EROD. SYMBOL ~ SOIL NAME : TEXTURE :RANGE :NIRR : K~ T;GROUP SaC2 ; SCHUMACHER :SIL : 20-30; 4E : 0.32 : 3: 5 SaD :SCHUMACHER :S I L : 341-40: 6E : 0. 32 : 3: 5 Sa0 ;SCHUMACHER ;SIL : 40-55: 7E : 0.32: 3: 5 ScC :SCHUMACHER :GR-S Il. ~ 5-30; 4E : 0. 241 : 3: 6 ScC2 :SCHUMACHER :GR-SIL ~ 5-341: 4E ; 0.20; 3: 6 ScD .:SCHUMACHER :GR-SIL ► 30-40; 6E : 0.20: a: 6 ScD :SCHUMACHER :GR-SIL : 40-55: 7E : 0.20; 3: 6 ScD2 :SCHUMACHER ;GR-SIL,' : 30-40: 6E : 0.20: 3: 6 Sc02 :SCHUMACHER ' :GR-SIL : 40-55: 7E : 0.20; 3; 6 *S e ; SEM I AHM00 ' :MUCK ; o- 1 : "SW : 0 . 00; 5 : . tcS k :SEM I ANM0O , :MUCK ; 0- 2; 2W : 0. 410 ; 5; : DRAINEO 11 • , -ieSm :SEMIAHM009 OR., :MUCK ; 0- 2; 3W ; 0,00; 2: 2 : MOD. SHALLOW SnA :SNOW ;SIL ; 0- 5; 2C ~ 0.32: 5: 5 SnC :SNOW :SIL ~ 5-15; 3E ~ 0.32:. 5: 5 SnC :SNOW :S I L ~ 15-30; 4E ; 0. 32 : 5: 5 ~ S oE :SPE I GLE :STV-S I! ; 30-70: 7S ; 0. 20 ; 5; 7 SpC :SNOKANE ;L ~ 0-30; 4E ; 0.28; 2: 5 SpD :SPOKANE ; L ; 30-40:-6E : 0. 28; 2: 5 S p0 ;SPOKANE :L ~ 4 0- 5 5: 7 E ; Q t. 2 8; 2; 5 . SrC ;SPOKANE :ST-l. ; 0-30: 6S ' : 0.24; 2: 6 SrE :SPOKANE :ST-L : 30-40; 6E : 0.24: 2: 6 S rE :SPOKANE :ST-L : 40-65 ; 7E 41. 24 : 2: 6 SsC :SPOKANE ;L ; 0-30; 4E : 0.28; 2; 5 SsC ;SKANID :L ~ 0-30: 6E : 0.37; 1; 5 SsE :SPOKANE :L- ; 30-65; 7E : 41.28; 2; 5 SsE :SKANID :L ; 30-65: 7E : 0.37; 1•: 5 StC :SPOKANE :ST-l. ~ 0-30; 6S ~ 0.24; 2; 6 Str ;ROCK OUTCROP ;Uw6 ; 0-30; 8S ~ StE :SPOKANE ;ST-L ; 30_65; 7E ~ ~J.24; 2; 6 S tE ; ROCK OUTCROP ; UWB ; 30 7(d ; 8S SuE ;ROCK OUTCROP ;UWB ; 20-741; 8S SuE :SPOKANE* ;ST-L : 20-65; 7E ; 0.24; 2; 6 ~ Sw8 :SPR I NGDALE ; GR-SL ~ 0-20 ; 4E ~ 0. 15 1!: 4 Sx6 ;SPRINGDALE :GR-SL ; 0-20; 4E ~ 0.15: .2: 1 4 Sy8 ;SPRINGDALE ;CB-SL ; 0-20; 6E 1; 4 # 5; 2 SzE :SPRINGOALE :GR-LS ; 40-741: 7S ;.10 ' ~ ~ , TeB ,TEKOA ,GR-SIL 5-20: 4E ; 0.24: 2; 6 TeC ;TEKOA :GR-SIL ~ 20-30: 4E : 0.24; 2; 6 TeD ;TEKOA :GR-SIL ; 30-40; 6E ; 0.24; 2; 6 Te0 ;TEKOA :GR-SIL ~ 40-55: 7E ; 0.24: 2: e Tk0 ;TEKOA :GR-SIL ~ 30-55: 7E 0.24: 2; 6 Tk0 ;ROCK OUTCROP :UWB ~ 25-55: 8S UhA ;UHLIG :SIL ~ 0- 5~ 2C 5; 5 j UhB ; UHLIG :SIL ~ 5-20, 3ET~ ; 0.37 5~ 5~ UmC ;UHLIG VARIANT :SIL ~ 5-15: 3E : 0.37; 2; 5 UmC ;UHLIG VARIANT :SIL ~ 15-30: 4E ; 0.37; 2: 5 VaC :VASSAR ; SIL ~ 5-15 : 6E : 0.32 : 3 ~ Z/J.. i.:. ' litl64: 3- SG . ' y- SG .~S- 5G _ ys A- l8 ~ ~1A~~ . ~►N-51 l - ~ • • V'a : Q) M ~ C'~? C7 ' : - . . a o ~ O Z ~ ' . c~ z ~ ~ i ~ . - 200 U ~ , L 0 U ~oa ~ ~ . ~o w . c 4 ~ ~ ~a - Q ~ r . „ p Q~ _ ~o 0 A , 1 p ~ A~E~. . SC / ~ . AT~ ~ ~P . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ , , . ~ . . • , s . R . E ~ E . _Ul 1 ~ I ~ _ . , ~ . ~ . R . . , . E , , , , P . . o - ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ , - . . _ . . A: . B ~ CD ' ~ ` ` Q 0~' n . ~ q : ) ' % ~ r ~i ~ ~ ~ ' y~~ „ ..i , . . 1 ' / ~o • ` ti , . ~ , . i Y y~G► R' , ~ ~ ~ , ~l , ' Z m ~ , . ~~u✓~e`~ , r- , . _ . / . ~ . ~ % q~ \ ' ' . , / ~ ~ , . ' ~ ''V \ ~ . ~ , • . Q m ~1 4 ~ . , . . . , . . ' ~ ~ ~ . . ' . . ~ , . • ~ ao~ . , , . , ~ ~ _ , ~ ~ - ! 9 . . . . , . ~t ~ , . , ~ . , no ~ . ' ' } ~ . ~ ':~a ' . ~ ~ < < . . ~y~ ~ . . ~ , . , . , ~ ~n . . . , ~I ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ''n ~ ` , ~ ~ a • es . . i • , , , , • ~ , . ~ ~ li ~ ' • ' y. . . • • • ~ . . `ti`n ` ' I•~~7 , ' i , . • ~''J ~ . ~ . Y p, 1 ~ ~ . p . ' . ~ . ~ap':p~ . , ' ` ~p~' ~ ~ ' , ~ „ ' ~ . . , . . . ~ • ° . . . . • . . . . vpGS • ~ . , ~~^c ~ . ~ ~ , ._.r, ~~,~j►. . . . . . ~ • , I~"~4 e2+'i . . ~ •?oba~ • ~ , ~ • ~ , . ' ' ~ . ~ ; . ~ ~ , . ~ ~ . ~ . . . ~ ~,J~`~ ~ ~ "rQoS . , i . ~ , . . ~ ~ ~ ' ~o ♦ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w . , • ~ r , . . ;r • . ,opK? • , , • . . • • ' , . , ' . ' ~ ' . . . , ~ V ' - ' ~ ' , . • ,RQ„~h ~ . . ~ . . . . . . ' ~ " . . , , ~ ' C8 ~ ' ' . . „ N,` . , ~ . , . F.. ~ . Yr ~ . . ..7~i . _ . ~ / ~N CP rt) , , , ' W . . . , , , . 0) cv) . . ~ . ~ , . . • , , , ~ ' , ~ r . . 3 - 0 LO ► . ~ ' < < ' . t~ ~ . . ~ ..........-:~:4•.....• ~ - _ _ t--•' N Z ~ ~ ~Q~ . ~ . . + 4 f . tt , ~ . ~ ~ • A ~ ~ • 1N _gAS ~ b. ~ B ~ tJj 0..~..~ . S~ reet o ~ ' St r , aed ~n pnd o ~ ~ 41►1 inclu in P . . ot ~ dea , N ~clv ~ . ~ . , hvt . . w - w, 1 . . f~o . - c~ ~ ' x X (D ~ ~o:,~ . c.~ . . . . _ . . ?rl C) C . 0 R . ~p E N ~ T N ~ 3s ,cco'• IV ~ t ~ Z . . ~ E . P ~ Z ~ . . ~ m I ~ . ~ . _ A , ~ CD Ln r~ . . B ~ . o . . . , , , ~ O - ~ ~ ~ , a ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ' . ~ . / ~ / r rv'~~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 1 r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ SHELLEY ACRES ADDITION POST DEVELOPMENT BASIN DATA BASIN BASIN AREA BASIN AREA 208 TOTAL PERVIOUS COMPOSITE SQ. FEET ACRES IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS , AREA C-VALUE AREA AREA ACRES ' SQ.FEET ACRES SQ. FEET SQ. FEET A 192,535 4.42 11,660 21,654 0,50 170,885 3,92 0.2 B 86,249 1.98 11,186 16,186 0.37 70,063 1.61 0,3 C 142,877 3.28 22,428 32,428 0.74 110,449 2.54 0,3 D 47,045 1.08 8,523 11,023 0.25 36,022 0.63 0.3 E 36,284 0.81 6,063 8,563 0.20 26,731 0.61 0.3 Notes; ' • 1} 208 impervlous area includes the streets and 600 s.L for each driveway. 2) Total impervious area includes the street, driwvay and 2500 s.f. home on each lot. '-W l N ' BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: A DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 4-Mar-99 Total Area (calc. )(see H 1) 4.42 - Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H1) 5.00 Composite "C" (calc.) (see 1-11) 0.23 Time of Conc. (min) 5.00 Area (Acres) 4.42 / C' Factor 0.23 ~ 208 Impervious Area (sq. ft. ) 11650 972 Pond floor area Volume Provided (cu. ft. ) 208: 782 storm (total): 1300 surface: 1300 u/g: 0 Outflow (cfs) 1 0.00 Area • C" Factor 1.04 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #fi #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. (min. ) (sec. ) (in./hr. ) (cfs) (cu. ft. ) (cu. ft. ) (cu. ft. ) (#1 t60) (A•C*#3) (Outf.`#2) (#5-#6) 5.00 300.00 3.18 3.30 1327 300.00 1027 5 300 3.18 3.30 1327 300.00 1027 10 600 2.24 2.33 1632 600.00 1032 15 900 1.77 1.84 1841 . 900.00 941 20 1200 1.45 1.51 1960 1200.00 760 25 1500 1.21 1.26 2012 1500.00 512 - 30 1800 1.04 1.08 2053 1800.00 253 35 2100 0.91 0.94 2080 2100.00 -20 40 2400 0.82 0.85 2130 2400.00 -270 45 2700 0.74 0.77 2152 2700.00 -548 50 3000 0.68 0.71 2190 3000.00 -810 ' 55 3300 0.64 0.66 2264 3300.00 -1040 60 3600 0.61 0.63 2344 3600.00 -1256 ' 65 3900 0.60 0.62 2492 3900.00 -1408 70 4200 0.58 0.60 2590 4200.00 -1610 • 75 4500 0.56 0.58 2675 4500.00 -1825 80 4800 0.53 0.55 2697 4800.00 -2103 85 5100 0.52 0.54 2808 5100.00 -2292 90 5400 0.50 0.52 2856 5400.00 -2544 95 5700 0.49 0.51 2951 5700.00 -2749 100 6000 0.48 0.50 3040 6000.00 -2960 • "208" CALCULATIONS Required grassy swale pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in./ft. = 485 cu. ft. provided: 782 cu. ft. OK! 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM-STORAGE CALCULATION Maximum storage required by Bowstring = 1032 cu. ft. provided: 1300 cu. ft. OK! 5-3 ' PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES RATIONAL EQUATION (FLOW CALCULATION) . BASIN: A DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 04-Mar-99 Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Areas °C' A'C Ct = 0.15 L2 = 550,/ 0.50 0.90 0.45 Z1 = 50.0 3.92 0.15 0.588 L1(A) = 100 j Z2 = 3.0 0.00 0.90 0 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.00 0.00 0 S(A) = 0.2 ~ n= 0.016 0.00 0.00 0 ' s= 0.4001 0.00 0.00 0 Tc (A) = 2.22 d= 0.119 0.00 0.00 0 . . , Total A Comp "C" L1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 1.03 4.42 0.23 N(B) = 0 S(B) = 0 Tc(A+B) = 2.22 Q=C*I"A= 3.30 Tc (B) = 0.0 Tc(tot.) = 5.00 Q(est.) = 3.31 . Intensity = 3.18 A = 0.372119625 WP = 6.3009 ' R = 0.0591 V = 8.90 Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) = 1.03 Tc (overland) = Ct'(L1'N/S"0.5)^0.6) Q(est) = 3.31 Ct = 0.15 L1 = Length of Overiand Flow Holding = 19.60 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overland flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch 21 = inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross-slope two of ditch - d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) . Area = d'B+d^2/2'(Z1+Z2) ~ Wetted perimeter_ B*d+(1/sin(atn(121))+1/sin(atn(122))) Hydraulic Radius - R- Area/Wetted Penmeter Velocity = 1.486/n"R^.667's^.5 Flow = Velocity'Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s= longitudinal slope of gutter ~ . . 13 1 ' ~ BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES DRAINAGE SWALE DESIGN BASIN: B DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 4-Mar-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H1) 1.98 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H1) 6.69 Composite "C" (calc.) (see 1-11) 0.29 Time of Conc. (min) 6.69 Area (Acres) . 1.98 ~ C' Factor 0.29 ~ 208 Impervious Area (sq. ft) 11186 936 Pond floor area Volume Provided (cu. ft.) 208: 62$ storm (total): 1255 surface: 1255 - , u/g: 0 - -Outflow (cfs) . . 1 0.00 Area ' C" Factor 0.57 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #fi #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. ~ (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft_) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (#1'60) (A*C'#3) (Outf.'#2) (#S-#S) 6.69 401.40 2.86 1.64 884 401.40 483 5 300 3.18 . 1.83 734 300.00 434 10 600 2.24 1.29 948 600.00 348 15 900 1.77 1.02 1054 900.00 154 20 1200 1.45 0.83 1113 1200.00 -87 25 1500 1.21 0.70 1138 1500.00 -362 30 1800 1.04 0.60 1157 1800.00 -643 35 2100 0.91 0.52 1169 2100.00 -931 40 2400 0.82 0.47 1195 2400.00 -1205 45 2700 0.74 0.43 1206 2700.00 -1494 50 3000 0.68 0.39 1225 3000.00 -1775 55 3300 0.64 0.37 1264 3300.00 -2036 60 3600 0.61 0.35 1309 3600.00 -2291 65 3900 0.60 0.34 1391 3900.00 -2509 70 4200 0.58 0.33 1445 . 4200.00 -2755 75 4500 0.56 0.32 1492 4500.00 -3008 80 4800 0.53 0.30 1503 4800.00 -3297 85 5100 0.52 0.30 1564 5100.00 -3536 90 5400 0.50 0.29 1590 5400.00 -3810 95 5700 0.49 0.28 1643 5700.00 -4057 100 6000 0.48 0.28 1692 6000.00 -4308 ~ "208" CALCULATIONS Required grassy swale pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in.ift. = 466 cu. ft. provided: 628 cu. ft. OK! 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM-STORAGE CALCULATION Maximum storage required by Bowstring = 483 cu. ft. provided: 1255 cu. ft. OK! ~ -S ~ . PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES RATIONAL EGlUATION (FLOW CALCULATION) BASIN: B DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 04-Mar-99 Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Areas "C" A'C Ct = 0.15 L2 = 5501 0.37 0.90 0.333 Z1 = 50.0 1.61 0.15 0.2415 L1(A) = 100' Z2 = 3.0 0.00 0.90 0 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.00 0.00 0 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0.0164 0.00 0.00 0 s= 0.400 ~ 0.00 0.00 0 Tc (A) = 5.46 d= . 0.091 0.00 0.00 0 • Total A Comp "C" L1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 1.23 1.98 0.29 N(B) = 0 S(B) = 0 Tc(A+B) = 5.46 Q=C'I'A= 1.64 Tc (B) = 0.0 Tc(tot.) = 6.69 Q(est) = 1.64 Intensity = 2.86 A = 0.2194465 WP = 4.8387 R = 0.0454 . V = 7.46 Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) = 1.23 Tc (ovedand) = Ct'(L1'N/S^0.5)^0.6) Q(est) = 1.64 ' Ct = 0.15 L1 = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 19.60 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overland flow • Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z1 = inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch . d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) Area = d'B+d"22"(Z1+Z2) . Wetted perimeter = B'd+(1/sin(atn(121))+1/sin(atn(1/Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity = 1.486/n•R".667's".5 Flow = Velocity'Area n = 0.016 for asphalt s= longitudinal slope of gutter 13~b ' BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: C DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 5-Mar-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H1) 3.28 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see H1) 6.16 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H1) 0.32 Time of Conc. (min) 6.16 Area (Acres) 3.28 - C' Factor 0.32 208 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) 22428 1686Pond floor area Volume Provided (cu. ft.) 208: 1122 storm (total): 2245 surface: 2245 . . _ , u/g: 0 Outflow (cfs) 1 0.00 Area * C" Factor 1.05 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in.lhr.) (cis) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (#1 "60) (A`C-#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 6.16 369.69 2.96 3.10 1536 369.69 1166 5 300 3.18 .3.33 1338 300.00 1038 10 600 2.24. 2.35 1702 600.00 1102 . ' 15 900 1.77 1.85 1901 900.00 1001 20 1200 1.45 1.52 2013 1200.00 813 25 1500 1.21 1.27 2060 1500.00 560 30 1800 1.04 1.09 2097 1800.00 297 35 2100 0.91 0.95 2121 2100.00 21 40 2400 0.82 0.86 2168 2400.00 -232 45 2700 0.74 0.77 2189 2700.00 -511 50 3000 0.68 0.71 2225 3000.00 -775 55 3300 0.64 0.67 2295 3300.00 -1005 60 3600 0.61 0.64 2379 3600.00 -1221 65 3900 0.60 0.63 2529 3900.00 -1371 70 4200 0.58 0.61 2627 4200.00 -1573 75 4500 0.56 0.59 2712 4500.00 -1788 80 4800 0.53 0.55 2733 4800.00 -2067 85 5100 0.52 0.54 2845 5100.00 -2255 ' 90 5400 0.50 0.52 2893 5400.00 -2507 95 5700 0.49 0.51 2989 5700.00 -2711 100 6000 0.48 0.50 3079 6000.00 -2921 "208" CALCUTATIONS Required grassy swale pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in.fft. = 935 cu. ft. provided: 1122 cu. ft. OK! 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM-STORAGE CALCULATION Ma)amum storage required by Bowstdng = 1166 cu. ft. provided: 2245 cu. ft. OK! a-7 ~ - - r PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES RATIONAL EQUATION (FLOW CALCULATION) BASIN: C DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 05-Mar-99 Tc (overland) Tc (gutter) Areas "C" A'C Ct = 0.15 L2 = 400 ~ 0.74 0.90 0.666 Z1 = 50.0 2.54 0.15 0.381 L1(A) = 100 ~ Z2 = 3.0 0.00 0.90 0 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.00 0.00 0 S(A) = 0.01 ~ n= 0.016 / 0.00 0.00 0 s= 0.500✓ 0.00 0.00 0 Tc (A) = 5.46 . d= 0.111 0.00 0.00 0 . Total A Comp "C" - L1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.70 3.28 0.32 N(B) = 0 . S(B) = 0 Tc(A+B) = 5.46 Q=C*I*A= 3.10 Tc (B) = 0.0 ~ Tc(tot.) = 6.16 ~ Q(est.) = 3.11 intensity = 2.96 A = 0.3265065 WP = 5.9021 R = 0.0553 V = 9.53 Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) . Tc(gu) = 0.70 Tc (overland) = Ct*(L1*N/S^0.5)110.6) Q(est) = 3.11 Ct = 0.15 L1 = Length of Overiand Flow Holding = 14.25 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overiand flow Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z1 = inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) Area = d'B+d"22"(Z1+Z2) Wetted perimeter= B'd+(1/sin(atn(121))+1/sin(atn(1/Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity = 1.486/n'R^.667's^.5 Flow = Velocity'Area ~ n = 0.016 for asphalt s= longitudinal slope of gutter - ~ BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) "PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: D DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 3-lun-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H1) 1.08 Time of Conc. (calc_) (see H1) 5.81 Composite "C" (caic.) (see H1) -0.32 Time of Conc. (min) 5.81 Area (Acres) 1.08 C' Factor 0.32 208 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) 8523 - 686 Pond floor area Volume Provided (cu. ft.) 208: 403 storm (total): 805 surface: 805 . . u/g: 0 Outflow (cfs) 0.3 0.00 Area " C" Factor 0.35 #1 ' #2 #3 #4 #5 #t6 #7 Time Time intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (A•c-#3) EOutf.'#2) (#5-") 5.81 348.47 3.03 1.06 494 104.54 390 5 300 3.18 1.11 447 90_00 357 10 600 2.24 0.78 _562 1150.00 382 15 900 1.77 0.62 630 270.00 360 20 1200 1.45 0.51 668 360.00 308 25 1500 1.21 0.42 684 450.00 ' 234 30 1800 1.04 0_36 697 540-00 157 ~ 35 2100 0.91 0.32 706 630.00 76 .40 2400 0.82 0.29 722 720.00 2 45 2700 0.74 0.26 729 810.00 -81 50 3000 0.68 .0.24 741 _90_00 -159 55 3300 0.64 0.22 765 990.00 -225 .60 3600 0.61 0.21 793 1080.00 -287 65 3900 0.60 0.21 843 1170.00 -327 70 4200 0.58 -0_20 .875 12.M00 -385 75 4500 0.56 0.20 904 1350.00 -446 80 4800 0.53 0.19 911 1440.00 -529 ' 85 5100 0.52 0.18 948 1530.00 -582 ' 90 5400 0.50 _0. 17 964 1620_00 -656 95 5700 0.49 0.17 996 1710.00 -714 100 6000 0.48 0.17 1026 1800.00 -774 "208" CALCULATIONS ' . Required grassy swale pond storage volume = Impenrious Area x.5 in./ 12 in.fft. = 355 cu. ft. provided: 402.5 cu. ft. OK! - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM-STORAGE CALCULATION Maximum storage required by Bowstring = 390 cu. ft. . provided: 805 cu. ft. OKl 1 ! - PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES RATIONAL EQUATION (FLOW CALCULATION) BASIN: D DESIGNER: JGL ~ DATE: 05-Mar-99 Tc (overiand) Tc (gutter) Areas "C" A'C , Ct = 0.15 L2 = 450 0.25 0.90 0.225 Z1 = 50.0 0.83 0.15 0.1245 L1(A) = 50 Z2 = 50.0 0.00 . 0.90 0 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.00 0.00 0 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0.016 0.00 0.00 0 s= 0.100 0.00 0.00 0 Tc (A) = 3.60 d-~ 0.079 0.04 0.00 0 . Total A Comp "C" L1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 2.20 1.08 0.32 N(B) = 0 S(B) = 0 Tc(A+B) = 3.60 Q=C*I*A= 1.06 Tc (B) = 0.0 Tc(tot.) = 5.81 Q(est.) = 1.06 Intensity = 3.03 A = 0.31205 WP = 7.9016 R = 0.0395 . V = 3.40 , Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) = 2.20 Tc (overland) = Ct'(L1 "N/S^0.5)^0.6) Q(est) = 1.06 Ct = 0.15 L1 = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 16.03 N= friction factor of overland flow (.4 for average grass cover) S= average slope of overfand flow _ Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z1 = inverse of cross slope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch d= depth of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) . Area = d'B+d^y2*(Zl+Z2) Wetted perimeter = B'd+(1/sin(atn(1/Z1))+1/sin(atn(1/Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity = 1.486/n"R^.667*s^.5 - Flow = Velocity"Area ~ n = 0.016 for asphatt , s= longitudinal slope of gutter , Q-l0 BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: E DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 5-Mar-99 Total Area (calc.) (see H1) 0.81 Time of Conc. (calc.) (see 1-11) 6.09 Composite "C" (calc.) (see H1) 0.34 Time of Conc. (min) 6.09 Area (Acres) 0.81 C' Factor 0.34 208 Impervious Area (sq. ft.) 6053 500 Pond floor area Volume Provided (cu. ft.) 208: 326 storm (total): 653 surface: 653 - ulg: . 0 Outflow (cfs) . 0.3 0.00 Area * C" Factor 0.27 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #fi #7 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage Inc. Inc. (min.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (#1 *60) (A*C"#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) 6.09 365.26 2.98 0.81 395 109.58 286 5 300 3.18 '0.86 347 90.00 257 10 600 2.24 0.61 440 180.00 260 15 900 1.77 0.48 492 270.00 222 20 1200 1.45 0.39 521 360.00 161 25 1500 1.21 0.33 534 450.00 84 30 1800 1.04 0.28 543 540.00 3 35 2100 0.91 0.25 550 630.00 -80 40 2400 0.82 0.22 562 720.00 -158 45 2700 0.74 0:20 567 810.04 -243 ' 50 _ 3000 0.68 0.18 577 900.00 -323 55 3300 0.64 0.17 595 990.00 -395 • 60 3600 0,61 0.17 617 - 1080.00 -463 65 3900 0.60 0.16 656 1170.00 -514 70 4200 0.58 0.16 681 . 1260.00 -579 75 4500 0.56 0.15 703 1350.00 -647 80 4800 0.53 0.14 709 1440.00 -731 ' 85 5100 0.52 0.14 738 1530.00 -792 90 5400 0.50 0.14 754 1620.00 -870 95 5700 0.49 0.13 775 1710.00 -935 100 6000 0.48 0.13 798 1800.00 -1002 , "208" CALCULATIONS Required grassy swale pond storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in./ 12 in./ft. = 252 cu. ft. provided: 326 cu. ft. OK! 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM-STORAGE CALCULATION Maximum storage required by Bowstring = 286 cu. ft. provided: 653 cu. ft. OK! PROJECT: SHELLEY ACRES RATIONAL EQUATION (FLOW CALCULATION) BASIN: E DESIGNER: JGL DATE: 05-Mar-99 Tc (ovedand) Tc (gutter) Areas "C" A'C Ct = 0.15 L2 = 200 0.20 0.90 0.18 Z1 = 50.0 0.61 0.15 0.0915 L1(A) = 50 Z2 = 50.0 0.00 0.90 0 N(A) = 0.4 B= 0 0.00 0.00 0 S(A) = 0.01 n= 0.016 0.00 0.00 0 s= 0.010 0.00 0.00 0 Tc (A) = 3.60 d= . 0.110 0.00 0.00 0. • Total A Comp "C" L1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 2.48 0.81 0.34 N(B) = 0 • S(B) = 0 Tc(A+B) = 3.60 Q=C'I'A= 0.81 Tc (B) = 0.0 Tc(tot.) = 6.09 Q(est) = 0.81 Intensity = 2.98 A = 0.605 WP = 11.0022 R = 0.0550 ' V= 1.34 Tc (total) = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) = 2.48 ~ Tc (overland) = Ct'(L1 •N/S^0.5)^0.6) Q(est) = 0.81 Ct - 0.15 L1 = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 7.13 N= friction factor of overiand flow (.4 for average grass cover) ' S= average slope of overland flow • Tc (gutter) = Length (ft.)Nelocity (ft./sec.)/60 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch Z1 = inverse of cross siope one of ditch Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch . d= deptfi of flow in gutter (estimate, check estimate w'rth Flow) Area = d`B+d^22'(Z1+Z2) . Wetted perimeter= B*d+(1/sin(atn(1/Z1))+1/sin(atn(1/Z2))) Hydraulic Radius = R= Area/Wetted Perimeter Velocity = 1.486/n'R^.667's".5 Flow = Velocity'Area ~ n = 0.016 for asphaft s= longitudinal slope of gutter I~ ~ ~ 7i TE A~ GRA S A.'fipl~ A.~~~L - INL~ I ~ v S+a• 3+37. so, R+. OEPTH OF FLOW - FEET Cc..rb 3; le~ ~ I .01 .02 .03 04 .05 .06 .08 .10 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .e .9 1.0 ~ ~ . ~ ,--~--T--~ ~ 1.o I ~ I ~ ~ I i I ~ .6 .5 4 ~ , 1- L ~ .3 4 L La i U13 la~= !7•2 - ~ r--L-~--i o ~ .10 "L- 11-5 •t~A'C) p .os ~ 8, 6c- .06 VI" .os ~ ~ sF G~r.b• p~~,.~ II ! ~ ~ ~ ~ .os .03 oz ~ G►-eA~~ a I I I I I~ ~ ax 1--~---~- ,i~l oi I I ~ 1.0 '8 o.TZ ( a) DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF LENGTH OF CURB OPENING ' '6 0.5:5, -t- - INLETS WHEN INTERCEPTING ~ •s 100 % OF GUTTER FLOW , - - - - - - L Q ~ . ~ 1 - ~ I I I I - o6 ( b) PARTIAL 1NTERCEPTION ~ RAT10 FOR INLETS OF ' LENGTN LESS THAN _ La 2 oer O L~- ~2Y D y a 9C 0•1 = 1 RyQ~ss = 2.s'- l = /.s .io .os .os .oe .10 .2 a .4 .5 .s .e 1.0 a ~ = 5 ~l• r o , ~3 L/La D (D (9 CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLE iAle.,~ 0•93= 0•b7 c~s ON CONTINUOUS GRADE ,(,~S.L '"`b , S 6-39 FI GURE 1 Pass la.'e ~ QL ILA = 5,'Q.1~ = D, !o I ,~=1e~.cc~~ II 1e~- by r w ' Q;~ p.~ z. _ 0 PJ ~ t~7 c~'s - 0•`f g Seer' Ko+e Gbow- R7Pa ss- . , Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: +o Comment: Initial gutter depth at curb inlet 1 C O Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Left Side Slope.. 50.00:1 (H:V) Right Side Slope. 3.00:1 (H:V) Manning's n...... 0.01"6 Channel Slope.... 0.0129 ft/ft ~ , . Discharge........ . 2.50 cfs e, Fl~w wfoµ~- Sk1►"b~s;~ Computed Results: 3'3 C, Depth............ 0.20 ft Velocity.. , . . . . . . 2.29 fps Su~-h~.s~~ ~ _ (3•~~~(l,yoa~~(.~g~_ 0•90 Flow Area........ 1.09 sf Flow Top Width. 10 . 76 ft ~.30 - 0•~~ Wetted Perimeter. 10.79 f t So crs Critical Depth... 0.22 ft Critical Slope... 0.0078 ft/ft Froude Number.... 1.27 (flow is Supercritical) , - Open Channel-Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 C Z Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: shelley ~ Comment : Initial gutter depth at curb inlet 1 C~v~'or -~v ~ C4,.,b Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Left Side Slope.. 50.00:1 (H:V) Right Side Slope. 3.00:1 (H:V) Manning's n...... 0.016 Channel Slope.... 0.0129 ft/ft . , Discharge.......... 1.50 cfs Computed Results: Depth............ 0.17 ft Velocity......... 2.02 fps Flow Area........ 0.74 sf ' Flow Top Width... 8.88 ft wetted Perimeter. . 8.91 f t Critical Depth... 0.18 ft Critical Slope... 0.0083 ft/ft- Froude Number.... 1.23 (flow is Supercritical) ' Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 C~3 Triangular Channel Analysis & Design ' Open Channel - Uniform flow ~ Worksheet Name: shelley Comment : Initial gutter depth at curb inlet 1 (pr''ai 3-G""~ °Pp^^~~ . Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Left Side Slope.. 50 . 00 :1 (H : V) Right Side Slope. 3.00:1 (H:V) Manning's n...... 0.016 ~ Channel Slope.... 0.0129 ft/ft Discharge........ . 0.67 cfs Computed Results: Depth............ 0.12 ft Velocity......... 1.65 fps Flow Area........ 0_41 sf Flow Top Width... 6.57 ft Wetted Perimeter. 6.59 ft Critical Depth... 0.13 ft Critical Slope... 0.0093 ft/ft ~ Froude Number.... 1.17 (flow is Supercritical) ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . ' Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 C- I L~ C~ U ' S+e4• 3+37 so) ~t. OEPTH OF FLaW - y- FE T C„ vb _rl le Z, .01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .06 .00 .10 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0 1.0 . ~ ~ .8 I ~ I ~ i I I I ~ I .6 7. fi- -7 4---L -E-r I ~ r j _.1_ -rt ~ .4 j~~1_i_~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ I t I I i ~ I I I a .2 ~ I~L i i I t IL ~ t._J_..~ O• 10 5 o9S La, Lz 4-e~ ' ~ ~ ~.....~:T..~ G~Al ~ oe I i i' I f I I ° .06 •obs 3 ~ ~ ' ` • H.05 ~S E 5 .o. C4,4,-t , .o ~ 1 I I~ I 1 , I I I~ .o ~Sw~ L l I I I ~ .01 I I ~ i.o \ .e ( a) DISCHARGE PER FOOT OF i Ol .6 ~ LENGTH OF CURB OPENING ` INLETS WHEN INTERCEPTING 100 °to OF GUTTER FLOW ' - - - ~ - - - t ~ ~ .s - L 0 00 I . . ~ (b) PARTIAL INTERCEPTI ON 3 Qa . RAT10 FOR INLETS OF LENGTH LESS TMAN Lo / ~ -4-+ ••2 ti - o, L/t.,= - ~'31 ; •r~.a,cep~Q-- ~ ~ ~ •Q X 0.4jS- 0.79 jO D, 4~ y cf:s .os .06 .oe .10 .L .a \ .4 .s s e 1.0 / ~ L~a : s/.$H - ~ x~$ ` Q 57 CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS Q ON CONTINUOUS GRAOE f3yp~.ss s c~. ~ o- 57 ` a- 2e cpS 6_39 FI GURE 16 C 3 'Q. 2(o GTS 1 w4e✓Ltf4e(~ • • ~ ~ ` Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: r i O r 4'D ~ Comment : Initial gutter depth at curb inlet 2 Or-~ ;~9 ( Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Left Side Slope.. 50.00:1 (H:V) Right Side Slope. 3.00:1 (H:V) Manning's n...... 0.016 Channel Slope.... 0.0129 ft/ft Discharge......... 1.64 cfs _ Computed Results: ~ Depth............ 0.17 ft Velocity......... 2.06 fps Flow Area........ 0.80 sf Flow Top Width... 9.18 ft wetted Perimeter. 9.21 ft . Critical Depth... 0.19 ft Critical Slope... 0.0082 ft/ft Froude Number.... 1.23 (flow is Supercritical) ' - Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 ~ Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow , Worksheet Name : Comment : Initial gutter depth at curb inlet 2 2 d p~~,',~9) ~2 Solve For Depth Given Input Data: Left Side Slope.. 50.00:1 (H:V) Right Side Slope_ 3.00:1 (H:V) Manning's n...... 0.016 Channel Slope.... 0.0129 ft/ft Discharge......... 0.84 cfs Computed-Results: - Depth............ 0.13 ft ' Velocity.......... 1.74 fps Flow Area........ 0.48 sf Flow Top Width... 7.15 ft . Wetted Perimeter. 7.17 ft Critical Depth... 0.14 ft Critical Slope... 0.0090 ft/ft Froude Number.... 1.18 (flow is Supercritical) ' . ' Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 C-7 ~ Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channel - Uniform flow Worksheet Name: Q„;~. ~ Comment : Initial gu. tter depth at curb inlet 2 '=d D 3 f l Solve For Depth Given Input Data: ~ Lef t Side Slope.. 50 . 00 :1 (H : V) - Right Side Slope. 3.00:1 (H:V) Manning's n...... 0.016 Channel Slope.... 0.0129 ft/ft . Discharge......... 0.26 cf s Computed Results: - Depth............ 0.09 ft Velocity......... 1.30 fps Flow Area........ 0.20 sf Flow Top Width... 4.60 ft Wetted Perimeter. 4.62 ft Critical Depth... 0.09 ft Critical Slope... 0.0105 ft/ft Froude Number.... 1.10 (flow is Supercritical) ~ - ~ Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc.,* 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 . C-~ k..-il= '-).I v L,---j' t'o✓ U~,,L aro~ _ O' 45 I O X _ o.y3 - . 1.0iz +yb.y 9 - c,i-a, - sn c C~. s 11 c~- .9 8 10 3 . ' O•9 D' ~ 6 ' 9 2 4 .r s vsE 3.50~ LA. ~ ~.s ~ f- .s T ~ 2 ~ I ~ 6.5 W a ' i .0 ~ a G i 710- - .S 6 I.0 Z4j S .8 v Z i .s .e ~ z I~ W S O .7 ~ ~ .4 p ~i•4 U. W s.s 0 L.6 LL ~i C9 = 2 Z L s O o . 0 3 , r.• U. t ~ 2 3.S i~ . 0 n ~-.4 1 w = 2 i ~ de~~ 0 TS ~ 3 J .OA ~ F„ ~ . O 6 Q .3 _ W i o .os a zs z.s U. . 3 .Z ~ U. W O a _ } .02 a .2 W ~ 2 tj ~ O - a o ~ Q U .oi ° .is ~ a i , ~ • ` • ~ ' : : r . • MT. I. S , M • _ CtJRB , o~► 1 ' ~ (~LOCAL OEPRESSIOM (o) ~ ¢ . < ~ ~ 1•2 NOMOGRAPH FOR CAPACITY OF CURB euREAu OF PUSLic aoAos OPENING INLETS AT LOW POINTS OIVISION TwO, wASMINGTON, O.C. FIGURE 17 6-41 . C UUS p o~ ~ ~3as ' (GRATING IN PLANE OF PAVEMENT ) WATER RFA ~s}~+%o•~ O~S~ ~ su cE r xS . . dov = d 2 5 d j ~ S1N~ _ Wq ~ r• W= WIDTH OF FLOW T 0 10 20 30 40 5 50 60 TO 80 90 100 100 " Wq ; W =°/a WIDTH OF FLOW 40 90' Op . . . . . . . . 80 70• ~ 60- N OTE : The curve is bosed on povement with ° 50- uniform rote of rlse from curb to crown. ao- . ' ~ . 30. Cross- s~oPe _ - d Z D . ~V' X = ~ ~ *0 .20. \),j; 41 P ~,v~ S~ d , • 10. I ~A)3 q 1. f I ~ ~ ^ er P.~T r 0 0. ,,,5~ . ~ ~e_lyb cP-s w 4e--c - EXAMPLE S D Y Given : Q= 10 cfs d= 0.5 5x = 5% W= 0.5' - 0.05 = 10 t' With Wg = W= o= 20%, Groting 2' wide takes 44.5 % Q= 4.45cf3 And Gratin9 4' wide takes 75 % Q= 7.50 cf ci 1 4- oq ~ ""i/I. pow p✓<~(u.~ dJ C_7 a~ r~ GRATE ON A CONTINUOUS GRAO E • FIGURE 15 6-37 C-1 d ' Triangular Channel Analysis & Design Open Channei - Uni f onn f 1 ow Worksheet Name: Comment: Depth of flow on private drive at CB4 Solve For Depth Given Input Data: t Left Side Slope.. 50.00:1 (H:V) Right Side Slope. 50.00:1 (H:V) Manning' s n...... 0.016 Cu ~v e- Channel Slope.... 0.0700 ft/ft Z---A'11e"A Discharge........ 1.00 cfs Computed Results . Depth.....:...... 0.08 ft~ Velocity......... 2.93 fps Elow Area........ 0.34 sf Flow Top Width... . 8.. 2 6 f t Wetted Perime_te.r _ S..26 f t Critical Depth... 0.12 ft Critical Slope... 0.0095 ft/ft ' . Froude Number . . . . -2.515 (flow is Supercritical ) ' ' . ' - , Open Channel Flow Module,_ Version 3.11 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc.* 37 Brookside Rd * waterbury, ' C -11 ~ Circular Channel Analysis & Design Solved with Manning's Equation Qpen Charinel - Uni f orm f 1 ow Worksheet Name: Comnnent : Pipe f rQm. C84._ .to PQ~id D , Solve For F'ull Flow Capacity Given Input.Data: Diam4ter.......... 0.67 ft Slope............. 0.0066 ft/ft Manning.'.s. n..... : . Q.011 : Discharge......... 1.18 cfs Computed Results: Fu11. Fl.ow. Capaci.tX.. < < 1.18 _ cf s > o~ c~s Full Flow Depth........ 0.67 ft Velocity.. . . 3,33 fps Flow Area......... 0.35 sf Cr~~~~al- Depth._ . 0.51 f t Critical Slope.... 0..0076 ft/ft Per-c.ent._ Eu1I - _ _ - lQ.Q -00- % . . Full Capacity.. . . 1.118 cfs QMA.X ~ C ,94D . , ~ 1,26 c f s Fr-oude Number..... FULL ' Qpe-n..Charvrxe1, F1Qw. K-odule R , Versiorx 3 .11 (cl. 1990 Haest.ad_Methods,. Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury,,Ct 06708 ~-~Z U- r'JI Lf3as~~ ~S r~ow) 9r~Va~ D"iVe-, (Ap,~)c, s~. 71-3o ~ Q p. Z7 s CU~~ - " ` p. g i 10 4 .s L- a ! 8 Z~ 0, 27 3 10 - 6 . ,e I L~ 3 Z 9 4 ~ ~ ('se. Z 1~e~ ^j ~ -~'la,.~d e-s . ~ ~ ~.s En ;,"S o 2 " Z JaI e~, 0p ~ ~ .40 . a~e Q4 e✓ a: 6.5 v a ~t zi. 0 i t .S 6 N 1.0 = .9 U. v ~ s.s z ~~~'~►1 Z .e - .s ~ z . / W 5 O .s ~ .s 4, W i~ 0 L.6 . W U. LX Q _ ~ 2 • i~ 2 ~ L ~ ^ 4 QVj.~ W 2 - 2 ` 0;p~i 'b p . - r U. . - ~ ? 3.5 ~ Z ~-.s ~ a . W .oe . o o .zs s ~ u. .06 Q .3 O m ~ W W 0 .04 3 .2S 2 U. .2 . . ~ W a ' H .2 ~ r .02 (L t~ , ~ - 2 a ° LL. a " o .15 .oi .~s ~ a m L i ; • .:r..'•• , v~ MT. M CURB ~ LO.1 ~ IOCAL OEPRESSION (o) r ac ~ ~ z 4d 1.2 NOMOGRAPN FOR CAPACITY OF CURB OPENING INLETS AT LOW POINTS 9UpE/►U OF PUBLIC ROA05 ' OIVISION TWO, WASMiNGTOM, O.C. FIGURE 17 6-41 C,_' )3 A SHELLEY ACRES ADDITION STEEN COURT PAVEMENT DESIGN , Project No. 97-035 June 17, 1999 04 aAs&f~ p~ • x : ~ ,p 30891 ~`A~ ~Q18 TBS ~I~NAL O1 ~ IEXPIRES Z/211 Prepared By: • Metro Engineering, InG S. 324 Sherman St. Spokane, WA 99202 `IJKi~ ~UN`ENI Ph.: (509) 624-9351 ~~CKA`.~ ENGiNEER'S ORF;~~. • Fax: (509) 624-8153 G N A., ~^1L - ~0UNTY ENGIRl~IF. _ . . PAVEMENT DESIGN This project is the development of a 13 lot plat, located in the Spokane Valley. Approximately 1000 feet of Steen Court and 800 feet of Courtney Lane will be constructed as part of this project. Curb and gutter will also be constructed as part of this project (Steen Ct. only). All the roads, both within the plat and offsite, are local access roads. The pavement sections were designed based on the design matrix from the Spokane County Guidelines for Pavement Design. The design matrix is attached to this report. On the foUowing page is a spreadsheet used for the design of the pavement sections. It includes the location, design traffic volume, soil classification, minimum design section and the pavement section used. Four samples were given to Budinger and Associates for analysis (two from each roa.d). They tested the least desirable sample from each road. REFERENCES • Parameters for pavement design Spokane County Engineering Department • Sub-grade Soils report, dated March 9, 1999 Prepared by Budinger & Assoc., Inc. (ATTACHED) . SHELLEY ACRES PAVEMENT DESIGN ROAD SAMPLE ADT SUBGRADE SOIL MIN. DESIGN SECTION USEDLOCATION SECTION STEEN CT. ~ 4+05 200-600 ~ SM 211/8" 211/8" STEEN CT. 10+40 200-600 SM 278" 2"/8" - COURTNEY 4+10 0-200 GW 211/6" 2"/6" COURTNEY 7+25 0-200 GW 2"/6" 211/6" :21p~~e o ~ . _ ~Y a ~'x ~ ~ r~- • . + O ~ j ~ ~ o u N -~!i~ i. . • ~ ~ ~ ~~r L-! : . ~ ° ~ ~ ^ ~ ' ~ i . i ~ ~ I= w . ~ ~ ~ ~i a~ 2 S r •y . / ~ ' o i ~ • ~ ~ ~ • ~ . d _ : • ~ + : . ~ s~ • ~ ~ / _ ~1~~~~~ ~ ~~~:T•~~~' ~ ~ : - ~ ~ ~ ~ .f- ; ♦ ~ • ; ~ . 0001 ` ap fa ~s. ~ : In , ~ 4 ~ ♦ ~ 9. o: ~1 f o : Q ~1h ` a~ - ~ Q b~~ " _ • o • • •act '0 ~ 8 F3 8 ~ ~ ~ A ~W 3~~j" ~ Et ~ • P m In - ~ y < ~ ~ O I § ~ q D ~ F R Z 0 0 ~ N / . ~ ~ . . ~ CZ oF op • ~ 7 .c • ~ a . ~P. . . i 4~nn • . . . . . ~ r.Hy, ~ Nu'S~ '~n ~ Y ..6 ;i So S2 ~qff• , ~ n~ •~Y~Su` a~ j~ cmr 7~ M~ eQ ~ ~ V o ~ ~ ~ r C ~ d' J a o w y' d & . ~ ~ y ^ • ~ / • ~ ~ ~ / i ~ ~ ~ . ~ /y~_' ~ \ ~ . ♦ O ' ~ . ~ • rj - ~i ~ ~ ,.n ; _ . l~ ' ~ ~ ■ t, ~ ~ . ~7~ . ot•i~: rauW ~ ~ ..Q... . ...~i . • ^ • • 1 • v~ ~ ~ , , Q~J ~~a ~ ~ . n . arj cr : ' ; : ts~ ~ ~ , : o ~ • : • . y ........~►.i...............E........cruas+~s+-.+o! •F + 'n - er . ~ ~ . ~ , . ~ 4 ~ ~d aa•c..~i ue 'n . •i: : g ~ ~ ~ ~c:~ ~ - : • ` ~ . ~d ~ . ' u'[soi a f!'sro¢•--_. ~ . itz~ot. + ~ ~ ~cz+o~-...... " u+o~ ,A,~,~*~•' i......i-........_.... W.. ~ oD'tt~C► ]A4/w ~ + • -01 ~ ~ • . o ♦ ..s_.----•=----..._ . - . .s. ~ .s.---- ' ~ . • ~ . W. , Cl , : . ~ : . . + i~ . ~ ( ~ ~ ~ . . - ; + m . . . . ~ .c . N . . . . . ~ sv~~u[...~..:... ~y+ot • ...t ~A! OrLf+t aAe ~ : , • . ' ol ~ t • ~ ~ ~ : : ; . : oo : d ~ . . . : . , , q.... . ......1.......' . ♦ \ , p . \ ~ ~~r / ; ~ : ~ : ~ ^ ~ ~ • j • ♦ ~ l'`'.~~.: . 1 W • y{j ri ~ Y ' MO \ y ~ r~ ~ : : 02 lLOL I ' 6f ECOL . O ~ ~ a.. ~ O ' aVow ud xao•s w •I ~ ~ ' a~ccos ~ uxot ~ ~ ~ ia • KLt9t ' I {[7fCC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - I ~ 00'H K IA! ~ i OOYNC Nd ~ ♦ / L I ti'~ f ' aVM u~i cco[ ~ , • os ►►~0 w I oa ►a•• ~e ~ ~ ~ j ~ o 3820 E. Broadway Spokane, Washington 99202 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnical & materiat engineers . Y~ Qi Jcel Lee March 9, 1999 Meiro, Engineering - S. 324 Sherman Spokane, WA 99202 Project Number L99040 PROJECT: Shelly Acres Project Spokane, WA SiJRJECT: Results of I.aUoratory TAqmg Report #1 Dear Mr. I,ee, At your request, we have providing laboraiory testing services for the subject project. Our services 'are limited to the performance of specific laboratory tests, seleded at your discretion. For this period our involvement was limited to laboratory 'testing on 2 samples delivered to our . laboratory on March 1, 1999. . . At your request, the following tests were conducted on Samples #1 and #3 in general accordance with the methods listed: 1. Particle Size Analysis (w/o hydrometer) ASTM D-422 2. Atterberg Limits ASTM D-4318 Resuhs are presented on the attached Laboratory Summary. If you have any questions regarding this report, please call. Respectfully Submitted: ^ER & ASSCCIA''ES BUBIN - , , '.7 • ~ ~ • Soatt L. Wahers Mgr. Construction Services . SLW/sa Addressee - 2 Auadunerts • Laboratorv Summary Page 1 of 2 F.C. Budinger PE Stephen D. Burchett PE (509) 535-8841 John E. Finnegan PE FAX (509) 535-9589 Scott L. Walters 4 , ♦ Shelly Acres Project Number L99040 Spokane, WA LA.BORATORYSUMMARY i]NITS . LABORATORY NUMBER 99-0112 99-0114 SAMPLE NUMBER 1 3 SAMPLED BY Client Client SAMPLE TYPE Bulk Bulk - DATE RECIEVED 3/1/99 31/99 LIQUID LIlVIIT 40 57 PLASTIC LIlvIIT 32 24 PLASTIC'TY INDEX 8 33 UNIFIED SOII. CLASSIFICATION SM GW-GG 6" 100 S 3" % 87 I 1'/z" 100 56 E 1" P 99 43 - V 3/4" A 98 35 E 1/2" S 94 29 3/8" S 88 24 S #4 I 78 21 I #10 N 66 18 Z #16 G 59 16 E #30 53 15 #40 52 14 #100 49 12 #200 43 11 budinger & associates, inc. geotechnicai & material engineers 0 • ~ r LOCAL ACCESS PAVEMENT STRIJCTURES AVERAGE DAILY i'RAFFIC SOIL TYPE 0- 200 200-600 600 + ~ ' GW CZ76. 217611 211/61' .o > GP 211i6" 211n10 21I7" . GM 211/61' 211R" 211/81# GC 2~1/711 2fl/81' 3'76" SW 2'1/61' 211~701 2~1/711 SP 2176" 2~1/71' 2"/8" SM 211/711 r2"1811 31016„ . SC Pavement Design . ~ ML 311/6's 3,11811 4111641 CL Pavement Design O L 4"17" 511/7" 511/8" MH Pavement Design , OH Pavement Design PT Pavement Design- , 1) Soil type is ciassifed by the Unified Soil Classification System. 2) Required thickness is given as inches of asphalt concrete pavement over inches of crushed surfacing. SPOKANE COUNTY ALTERNATE PAVEMENT DESIGN . (INTERIM) _ . '