Loading...
1994, 03-09 Setback Variance ii ��� tip• � . S P O K A N E _ rrit O U N T PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D.HUBBARD,DIRECTOR NOTICE CIF SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING AIDIUSUOIE, IPUIiL IC IIIEAIll7NC DATE: March 9, 1994 TIME: 9:45 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible PLACE: Spokane County Public Works Building Commissioners Assembly Room 1026 W. Broadway Spokane,WA 99260 AGENDA ITEM #: 2 File: VE-02-94 VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK STANDARDS LOCATION: Generally located in the Spokane Valley on the southwest corner of Vista Road and Cataldo Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Section 18, Township 25N, Range 44EWM; 917 N. Vista Road. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to build a porch with a setback of 46 feet from the center line of N. Vista Road right of way; whereas section 14.616.325.A.1. of the Zoning Code of Spokane County requires a minimum of 55 feet from the center line of the roadway right of way. EXISTING ZONING: Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5) SITE SIZE: Approximately 8,190 square feet APPLICANT: Henry Hasse 917 N. Vista Road Spokane WA 99212 All meetings and hearings will be conducted in facilities which are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particular information,please contact the Spokane County Planning Department at(509)456-2205. NOTE: THE ZONING ADJUSTOR WILL ISSUE A WRITTEN DECISION TO APPROVE OR DENY THE ABOVE PROPOSAL. ONLY THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD MAY APPEAL THE ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION AND MUST DO SO WITHIN TEN(10)CALENDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE DECISION'S SIGNING. APPEALS MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A$210.00 FEE. APPEALS MAY BE FILED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING, 1026 WEST BROADWAY,SPOKANE,WA 99260 (SECTION 14.412.042 OF THE ZONING CODE OF SPOKANE COUNTY). THE ABOVE REFERENCED FILE MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99260-0240 • (509)456-2205 VE-2-94 • ... ' s .. ? . .• ,,,/• ;"eg. s - - 0 �,�...!.,,n.r,r..�,.•11M1-;', �•,i V1 S . ai . , Gk y .. ,3. { iftneLlt) r- r ..1:lig II lit C3— 51 ! 4 e ..... ,,4? ,..7 ,,i Y -1_ ‘. 'I : ;2-4704...iiiii - 111! li /1.�a_ Qw� J INI,i ANA AVE. . , iihria4. ril d �1 •ALD w.a •,t0 > ar , - FIT 1 1E11 • E r cc NORA AVE. i` ‘0.1_,,,•-•LA,.,..' j`1 . . . gamil, . . :,.: -, J I. • '1: r .. 1 �,.: •,m . .•. _, „ .d n? G Y:/75h'Rl.9+�M1--A 3'?�9G7P��V:i4VfY2C'> _�'ZS'JItt�.`.r'+•..AKYY N•-t . rsrv+.1MS; It i j.. a • ., . , ." ‘:ow.. . , . . ,, SAITO •���r• Z gii SHARP •• I p zis 444• • .. d $ p •,,••• • • • ••• • 124••••wr lir • dt V: R 0 .0 1 CATALOG jl^ P e y S ! S s I EL. _ , , _ ,` _ 8: et 2'/O • t.,.•4.... . 7(Y.. s(u7 u?V..�i.¢r G.••.... t•14... ,__Vwr»r�..•••t••rr.r.••..J..r+ow+.%•.r• r1 SAJI,t,C L¢'f A.Nfi'O .. .EL.. /96/ fir111511111 ti , �•i.KI . , PLKI .` I' r i • KI t ji ALTef:14 k j , ..0 g . _ ir: $ W..IIII SCh. 5 c; _ '..m��+r,nwrr-rr.r -.MN r. ry.r,.....t►a.2..,n ...a«t-s..i.�.•. .•sa IV.L. ' - I.,., CIIi ' L , • RI -, .1i 5'• i. .7��r - HA RRI N t, t '� �.. .,,..,.. ...,....,,„..... • r6. � �•�� J. h Lift . / qV E.iSEM.e NTN' 1 ,114* "�L# � �'R I N T��P�OM a.Ny/hC 'Q '�Ld��yUtJ .� D L —- [ANT aaJ=�9S __�_ JV ��-: 1 r Q . ;II q#Alibtept'. -� Y�- :�T �i�rtilbL�atr:M-:r�ti-a�S.7.�4K Vic...: �`>>: i� .� --4 :.+ E'L_. /98? , , ' y '� ++� ' 20 - :0 - Imp! ris...,„3 I\� . .•. �,� wa.�G x: •41.,,,, ..„.. _ . -le cr le 3,-• ' ., ........ .. . 0.‘ ' it e ' .'•. • SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR Name of Applicant: Pim.h ry Agent: Y N Street Address:• 117 Alp r �J , o_ Zip Phone - Home:67.2-4 1c9 City:S � �} n -L _ State:\ )i4S'H. Code: ?l Work: Agent's No.: Name of Property Owner(s): r Street Address: q I -7 • VI S`1-0--- Zip Phone - Home:9'7_4,/r,5,),c, City:.c State:Orfs/47/Code: c//1-_ Work: REQUES 1'ED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action): Variance(§) Conditional Use Permit Expansion of a • er: Nonconforming Use FOR STAFF USE ONLY Violation/ Section I /Township Range /� Enforcement: Y ON •Lot and legal checked by: •CWSA sewer purveyor: aid:C , •CWSSA water purveyor: 08 / 1) L hen •CUP standards met: Y N 'NA' •Existing zone: UQ—2,5 Cite applicable secti firerMM, ' `'. •Comp. Plan desig atzon (� Arterial Road Plan designation: ti J 7� •Fire District •Person doing preapp conf.: LC/�, j'iiJ 9944aZrfr-) —Other/previous Planning Deparment actions inv lving this property: Certificate of Exemption No.: -- < 5 , P Application No.: Ve, —,� — cJ *Hearing Date: /q •Site plan dimensioning checked by: 4" ABOUT THE PROPERTY (byn applicant) ' •Existing use of property: •Deesscribe•pro•osed us of the property, noting change from 'existing use': in •If a variance application, state the Code standard '?d describe the variance sought in comparable to s (i.e., 50 feet from centerline erses required 65 feet): _ •If a conditional use application, does propo 1 meet all standards? Y H not, has one or more variances been requested? Y •What is the size of the subject property. /OS � - � �S/or?! •Street address of property (if known): -Legal de cri don of pro erty (in lude easement, if applicable): `7 1 ) •Parcel No(s).: H- . •Source of legal: Jam'Qc 41. g •Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner sponsor and/or agent: •What interest do you (applicant) hors the property? ;e ,• • STAIHOFWASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SIZE; (2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. Signed: • 1 otary •ublic in and for the state of shington, residin• at AA AN" '..JV . My appointment expires: 9 page 1 of 2 ZA;APP kE.V. 10/93 • • r,Y . X'..78 :T DEN,. OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant) Ir Ts necsc:;saw^'fdrit- applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the ~0,U,E:S-ISD A:CT�ON should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor • • =. na. oi, ltg,t.h application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested 'tial;(!`nrianc ,Tconditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which ac!dr:�:,5 .-fhe-i*.ite.ria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the foie, out and return • it wftl `yo;L.•aaplication. B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES / ' (applicant must visit each agency whose no. is circle 2u, /"% G / d10 SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH MORI T / �} . 3 ' /�� Proposed method of water supply: _ �/r - moile r //� �� h) Proposed method of sewage disposal: ..iu/1�/_ A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. We y e `•°ns Itation with Planning Department Y N •9'6P-1- (Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived) 2.., SPOKANE 'COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • �• -� (Engin••ring •• oads Division) A preliminary :ons,lt.lon as been held to s'; uss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirem-its . . • a. ds. We reque consultation with Planning Department Y N ( ignature) • , ' W (Date) (Sign-off Waived) 4116 SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Planning Department may waive if outside WWMA) A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the pro t21":,•e•applicant has been informed of requiremen an. standards. /_. Z /C- / /-//- 67 7 (Signature): (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Planning?) [ ] The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with _.5-/'e5/4-,4 i/E /,</Z2 27? to become infor,ned of water system requirements and standards. (See#a below) [ ] The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of sewage disposal requirements and standards. (See#b below) a. WATER PURVEYOR: ,0-k,A/l.� inn D 3 1) The proposal is/is not locate within the boundary of our future service area. 2) The proposal is/is not located within the boundary of our current district. 3) We are/are not able to serve this site with adequate water. 4) Satisfactory arrangements have/have not been made to serve this proposal. • (Signature) (Date) • SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: ' . i 0 64-1-66 A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been info ned of requireme t`,:stan /. OP s�rZ" 'iry - _ (Si:fa ture) (Date) • • • page 2 of 2 ZA; APF REV; 10/93 ••t VARIANCE BURDEN OF PROOF FORM Name: /-/L---(2--'1A-- 2-c.Q -a File Number: --7 c A "variance" is the means by which an adjustment is made in the application of the specific regulations of the zoning classification for a particular(the subject)piece of property. This property, because of special circumstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classification. This adjustment remedies the difference in privileges. A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in the zone classification in which the property is located. The following questions will help to determine the outcome of your request. Your request requires accurate and complete responses. First circle either the "yes" or the "no" answer(s) following the questions below as they apply to your situation and then explain as needed (in the space provided) to make your unique situation clear. Certain phrases from the Zoning Code of Spokane County section on variances are included in these questions and are underlined for convenience. A. Will this variance permit a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone? YesNo Explain: ) u ,: � ri��L`� Cck B. Are there special circumstances (lot size, shape, topography, location, access, surroundings, etc.) which apply to the subject property and which may not apply to other properties in the vicinity? Yes No Explain: ,/C/,_*-) Ce C. Is the subject property deprived of privileges commonly enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in a similar One classification? Ye No D. Will this variance be harmful to the public welfare or to other properties in the vicinity and a similar zone classification? Yes No Explain: c J �r �n , ; r � Q . , 4, h a .jjr2. E. Are there other similar situations in the vicinity in a similar zone classification? 017e) Are they peiuiitted uses? (Yes) No Are they "nonconforming" uses? Yes No Explain:`--vvlc ,<� �t rte c.�,� y � ,�� �1-1-• - . V -L. -_ F. Could the subject property be put to a reasonable and permitted use by you or another person without the requested variance? Yes N Explain: b�)-(2- _e e G. If this request is granted, will the subject property be more environmentally sensitive, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an historic property? Yes No Explain: i- � �, _ � � �L 2� (32-etk Page 1 of 2 n H. If this variance is granted, will the broader public need or interest be served? �es1 No Explain: G2--a_, I. Will this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies to the subject property? Yes Explain:_z---Le--4---.6 u_., li c _c c�-- . z' + i J J. Will approval of this variance grant to the subject property the privileges of a different classification (in other words would this be a "de facto" zone change)? Yes L Explain: • K. Will this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan? Yes No Explain: rte _ L. Is this variance required for a reasonable economic return from the subject property or is the existing structure too small? Ye ' Explain: /v' (.'C j7Cc3L U�L- / ,� CK•,•-) r C: , M. Did the practical difficulty which caused you to apply for this variance exist before you owned the subject property? Yes No Explain: +rte �/ �16�-ci - �' c? °=�— =c .x42 L� � �- ' b N. If approved, would this variance affect land use density regulations which exist to protect the Rathdrum/Spokane Aquifer? Yes ' • Explain: The following space is for further explanation. Attach an additional page(s) if needed. You are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of this application. We have the equipment to display video tapes. No such additional material is required and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be considered in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure to be followed feel free to contact the Spokane County Planning Department at 456-2205. RP-VARIANCE;BURDEN OF PROOF FORM Page 2 of 2 REV;5/92 40/ cmc / /2 ye„, �oacr ��i7'O ('o+/Ac..t - cmc ecu:: C r 6.c/rk -• F- NcGch/ ,Dac • 1\ 7 i gi7 ��