1990, 12-05 Zoning Adjustor Public Hearing tit.?
S P c K A N E '';a i7Fpt? 3. i C CD U N T Y
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, DIRECTOR
TO: p M MoS , Planning Department
FROM: Tom Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator
DATE: 11 ' l3 - `1Q
RE: File Number: VE. -8$-90
Address: S . LID- ‘,06e_)2.€&).€t3 24—
Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked box(es) below:
The applicant shall contact the Department of Buildings at the earliest possible stage of design/development in order to be
informedd of code requirements administered/enforced by the departrnent; e.g., State Building Code Act regulations such as
requirements for fire hydrant/flow,fire apparatus access roads,street address assignment,barrier-free regulations, energy code
regulations,and general coordination with other aspects of project implementation.
}ie issuance of a building permit by the Department of Buildings is required.
V Requirements of Fire District No. need to be satisfied during the building permit process.
The applicant is advised that the private road shall be named and signed in accordance with the provisions of Spokane County
Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event that the Department of Buildings determines addressing on the
private road is not acceptable. However, at such time the Department of Buildings feels the need for the road to become a
private, named road,the applicant/owner shall participate and cooperate in this process.
The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction and proximity of
exposures. Based on information presented to this office regarding this subdivision, the minimum fire flow established by code
of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required.
We have no requirements for this proposal-existing conditions.
Specific comments are as follows:
WEST 1303 BROADWAY • SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99260-0050 • (509)456-3675
FAX (509)456-4703
A
f
'I F
4 '� } � � PLANNING DEPARTMENT
)1 I.1
e 1�1 I I �III, il i� i,i _ BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET
ti
V g 11 (11F(1 11a
A
:IIS PHONE 456-2205
n: +.• SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
NOTICE OF SPOKANE COUN'II'IY ZONING ADJUSTOR IFU I LIIC
IHIIEAJ ENG
DATE: December 5, 1990
TIME: 9:45 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible
PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department
2nd Floor Hearing Room,Broadway Centre Building
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane,WA 99260
AGENDA ITEM #: 3
File: VE-88-90
VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS FOR A DUPLEX:
LOCATION: Located in east Spokane Valley, at the northeast corner of the intersection of Fifth
• Avenue and.Warren Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 23,Township 25N,Range 44 EWM.
PROPOSAL: Locate a new duplex on a lot of 10,197 square feet; whereas, section 4.05.050 of
the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires the minimum lot size for a duplex to be 11,000
square feet.
EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural Suburban
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban
LA)
SITE SIZE: Approximately 10,197 Square Feet
APPLICANT: Mark Sodorff
10914 E. 23rd G�
Spokane WA 99206
AGENT: Barbara Altmaier
ITEMS CARRIED OVER FROM PREVIOUS HEARINGS MAY BE HEARD FIRST,
POSSIBLY CAUSING DELAYS. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR
THESE PROJECTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILES.
APPEALS OF THE DECISION ON THE ABOVE LISTED CASE MAY ONLY BE FILED BY
THE APPLICANT OR AN OPPONENT OF RECORD ACCOMPANIED BY A$100.00 FEE.
(Sections 4.25.090 and 4.25.100 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.)
VE889O
11. ? -it P4 ON %. II ill
: RI r
• /Tr -4 to r
a —1 ; i _r"\
il .6, . ,,..„
••(� aj- - =II• / /yl l I
• ' ' tL sw oV40.10m1KIOW#IO .•• •• •. ".o ii• ••:1••••• ,• - %We". • l'.N♦f nitaX'�l 0' Of
q i N' 2312 '' !
n 0
L _ . _ .. 4
'1 -- ��- _ ._ - _ __ _ __— -
_�- - -- ' . . . ' AVE 7 - -AVE. 1 1 •. „�,• .
No
,.. , ... !, LTA
f y.
s 1 9 in
1. 1F. RT .•
.o •.nal-••• An
R— - - -C4!•.n4 w. ...•4 1 rl.
•MWVFr 1•1.O fir.M'/M• / { ��
`4 .y.Wv .i r i C R t
-1 .f • f ; , 4 `TN T.. • W fin.. .
..a.w, r 1`A�i4tiA � -i-�
J N le
1L`nvn3..7G. • w
�6 ♦ -t ' N U , ... O• I6M W AVE
M"•.'a. 4.•.t_NHN,.'!•1.1-000..4r WSW=Pal:t.�9� .:1+'�Gt11=a—o•k/fl,r/I0h::`L'S'.:z.lt_9cy_nw p7•1s:,.iii'L'.crNiv a.iI
NW
,.-,.r........ 3 h
It' 3 1 TN
1.41 0} elt li
f
•• I • 1 I lois.
44,0 •l' IGT.. 1 • IITH
• •
V E..,.,.
I. 12TH t 7 F L ♦% - c
i ct
kV__ _ Z N S V: J •'..'!s7•+ 137Nr, ;;t LA
1
�Will, 1_ CO r. TNl'�� Al. 1a V i1••' 1�3 H • T NTN ] r
if
• V Id.. � J L' PGR N rIII ' .•. ~r
9puip t :;Y; sr
EMI AV E 1
I,' V lw.P.t? 4 G:.3/.. ..;..Nr..9...aN.i...a w+.'ft fti.re:Pa ;.,.-/.;.- •- ..-' -••. :y. •A-----%. :OC Ir.� .
0♦ Nrill 11111112,11"•D ',J
- . 111M.,} " ' - . eArl" , i it 4.
.! ILI i :pm .t-_,:• i.......... . ir
0
411,'-`': 5 y��IjZ' j1.
20T _ t •a. 2.1:11!.. 2
EV,
N! NI 0....-- I.-IN.,
• I a&
. 1
1 4 Mir
•
i� ,i� • h GZ I.i '� lit
23 rd
:•� 21T►i r N2 T'Ai ErT' .FOUR1 AV[. "N
I
1 . \
r- -----
82 ' 37
Br-15-•,�E,vcE
X x` -x x— x -Xi
,o x
,,,.., NX
,2 -D '///ri,,;
_ J
i
; X
Ikt_Jc 11
0 �� X
k., clO
0\ /p /Q' •
-? 29 ,a // --b- d'-U
IN
- -- - „�;, l�
1 -4,.) // CEC'K Q
h
\� * 4%E�c/CE
N
.
,
hCo-3 7 ,9 __ __oil
/L // -rn X91/6 , � i►)
"� 15D,
Qc
74,, !ice 3-4_0 'I 1-4,--r17, AVE
it/OT TD SC'AGE
v 1c m ►TY r4 i) P
IParceI 45- 237. • 0603
. . .,, Rezi",71.-
b �3
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Certificate of Exemption No.: Application No.: U 88'qv
Name of Applicant•.,���t.�4Th, .co, A i�l�t re r' Agent:Of N
Street Address: C. t 1 f7) ia.t.i' C k___
f.. Zip Phone - Home: ,.g-b'-'SVP9()
City k�-►L c_ State Code: c1 ��,. Work: --.�S Z.,S
Agents No.
Name of Property Owners) �/ek ,
Street Address: E/, "/'/ z4 soot) Gtr.¢ ,9A1
ZipPhone Home: 9;9- W 9,3
City: `50) State: code: r�'.2..0,6 ' ' Work: 9.Z Y.--4c71 2.4
RE* J . TE! ACfION(S) (Circle appropriate action): 1._m .:> w .. ,
Variance s Conditional Use Permit Nonconforming Lot/Use k
Waiver o Violation Temporary Use/Structure Other: •
FOR STAFF USE ONLY r; CODE: s ' 6INANCE w
Cite Regulations Section(s): /AS 0Sa *--"`•;:•,.•:.•44.— - , °•
'7, Property ';�Violationf,
Section: -.73 Township: -% Ranger /7 Size:/o 07 Enforcm t. Y
Existing Zone: _ C,l? Comp .Plan Des.: (Ik'� r " Crossover- _3. w.
' ' ; tee` LEGAL
PSSA()N UTA:�C N ASA. FIRS DIST, / CHECKED BY. r .,
Hearing Date:,/-/<-710 • rsonnel Taking in Application: ,717-
• �'
Existing Use of Property: VCt( ( R`I- \r't
Desfribe Intended Proposal in Terms of REQUESTED A IbNS above:
' -I- K.,pe.eri_x
17d ri 4 tl cf.e '''''',-. /.,/ iz,e-..e.- 6, ,t_r_ ,,,,,„,<ye-
� . _
r9 �( ,..„ , ,
Street Address of Property: WE‘.1'-ietcr\ex M? G�i\A �I(�P,c'1 ry
Legal Description of Prope ,(includeLeasement, if applicable):
St. fN1 cccc adh
235 y "Z - 0100 s it
Parcel No(s): 452.2. , O. Source' of Legal:•
+1 #�t _ 66/Y/NO a n ,(. ''\
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor.• /L - r
What interest do you hold in the Property? iv()f\-,C, -- a V AA
ci
Please list previous Planning Department actions `involving this property:
STATE OF WASHINGTON ',) 'SS
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ,./.-7-1:',4'1-
I SWEAR,UNDER PENALTY OF PERJUR'l THAT:,(1) IAM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED
AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE; (2)'a=NOT THE OWNER,WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID
OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED:'AND (3) ALL OF THE
ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE
BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
i ed: C2//dZ1--e' /
./i
0 1 1
i
NOTARY SEAL: ?^ i% ��. `' . _-•.I
1,1 7` ";1 ,�f1,f��'���'���yj�4,a410-- ashington,
•'SEs" MA't 1 _ .1' /.i!�i �_��' ? r
#0l••:••.••� <•• appoi. ment pre //A
ARY P4 T ,
�
j.,
4.
A. JIIIRDEN OF PROOF ' d j*.
It is necessary tfor'the ...." a his/her representative to establish the reasons
why the REQUIVT$W - s�`� .••u be approved and to literally" put forth the basic
case. Accordinily,`you • • 'av been given a form for your requested' action
(variance, conditiggal'tbe • 0•a ed to help you present your case in a way
which addresses , Edi*It i i. the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill
the form out and ret _' your application. If you did not get a form, ask the •
Planning Department personnel for advice on how to proceed.
B. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS-AND OTHER AGENCIES
1. 1 . . . . 1 r
a) Proposed method of water supply: ( vii -5i ) Axil-
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: -.5 4 G c{itAr-or."--
A prelim nary consultat'on has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant
has be info ed uirements and standards.
/0-1 710 •
(Signature) Date) (Sign-off Waived)
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT)OUNTY T
A preliminary consultation .has been held to discuss. thee,:proposal. The applicant
has b n informed of egtkiirements and standards.-'-
,e
Signa)tire (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
(3. 9OUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT (Waive if outside WMAB)
[!'j A prelimina consultation ,has-,been held. to "discuss the: proposal, • The
appli
P&
t has bee info ed of requirements and standards.y
(Signature) , (Date) (Sign-off°""Waived)"'
['7' The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with , Atsk..r
to become informed of water system
requirements and standards.
[rJ' The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards.
COVATER PURVEYOR: (Waive if outside CWSSA)
a) The proposal js/ie�st located within the boundary of our future
service area.
b) The proposal ist located within the boundary of our current
district.
c) We are/a9--nol able to serve this site with adequate water.
d) Satisfactory arrangements . eee/have not been made to serve this
,roposal. - -
(Signature (Date) (Sign-off Waived)
EWERAGE PURVEYOR:
(If other than Spokane County)
[ J A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal.
The applicant has been informed of requirements standards.
(Signature) (Date) (Sign ff Waived)
•
Page 4 of 4
VARIANCE BURDEN of PROOF Form NAME: _ hl'4 01(L-�rIQ_
Introduction to this form:
FILE NUMBER U , 'b7(3—90
A "variance" is the means by which an adjustment is made,in the application of the specific
regulations of the zoning classification for a particular (the subject) piece of property. This
property, because of special circumstances applicable to it, is deprived of privileges commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classification. This adjustment
remedies the difference in privileges. A variance shall not authorize a use otherwise prohibited in
the zone classification in which the property is located.
The following questions will help to determine the outcome of your request. Your request
requires accurate and complete responses. First circle either the yes" or the "no" answer(s)
following the questions below as they apply to your situation and then explain as needed (in the
, =provided) to make your unique situation clear. Certain phrases from the Spokane County
g Code section on variances are included in these questions. They are undo .
If
our
request is a ROAD FRONTAGE VARIANCE please answer only questions A,B,C,D,
andA. Will this variance permit a use which is otherwise prohibited in this zone?'� ' YesNo
Explain: P��
,-
.04111r � - `' , `, ;"
A 1. a+�i �
:an I try bc)-rA -f-- -s (-I e.- ixja4 x
B. Are there
(lin siii;UVP.Pp$ograPhYR locad* tse�
surroundings,etc.)which apply to the subject.property and which nay not' '` __
not apply to other properties in the vicinity? ` Yes No
Explant :T ` 1 - , ;Q(. pr`5 . 0.. .r_
r. -}j. .t+t 5tlrwl"�'^I�u�'.'PiA 1,1� 'r�".0..r Y
... ....''l 1 ,T. ,,,(744,*i..,i4.,"(: ,.
T, f. :f,is,
,f
C. Is the subject property deprive pf privileges commonly njoypd by other
properties in the vicinity and in a similar zone classificatioo7,-,- • Yes No
Explain .
- "v.• , '
f'h hf
D. Will r -
this variance be harmful to the public welfare or to otbeM1p es in '
the vicinity and a similar icy;classificatiop? •,,,4,`,.!:=;,..,i 4 ,, : , Yes No
Explain: I r) hPS,i�d� r-'° - . .- .. Y Tl
E. Arc there other similar situations in the vicinity a similar zone classificatiop? Yes '`-.No
Are they permitted uses ? Yes No Are they "nonconforming" uses? Yes No
Explain: 1 k Yl k It.Mk)
F. Could the subject property be put to a reasonable and permitted use by you or irk
another person without the requested variance? e
No
Explain: I e � a I .. t' ...,./ a ,<t' '.v
- 44,4
hff"i1L1r ��G)r,V ; " ir' "' �� : '"rV' r�14L� '�� :' \
y
G. If this request is granted,will the roect subject property be more environmentally sens' -.
energy conserving,or will it promote the use of an historic property? No
Explain: 1. i'g-C (- 'll.. --dLf2 pi7 Y/i) 4; y
/f) e_4_/ v&I--(iiive . ,.
Over please -
Rev: 5/22/'90 Page 1
H. If this variance is granted, will the broader public need or interest be served? Yes No
Explain: „'t„d a , la "o/'/ /41/g of e -z ,i 1 . °}N,;* .:, ,,orit-r c ,
I. Will this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies
to the subject property? Yes N�
Ex lain:��P 1 ,Q1• Cif,W . `; 't,'11(p f i ( ( f'f�/�FJJ q(I..'7%h
4 7- --t-tv _ Ic ixt- afi tilf:),. -±-1-)10, , ,5-ficzy t .
J. Will approval of this variance grant to the subject property the privileges of a different
zone classification (in other words would this be a(("de facto” zone change)? Yes No
Explain 1 c� ‘�- •1�� 2 la c &,',.€ -C-7-Y`i-s_�'dp� f
K. Will this variance be inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the •
Comprehensive Plan? Yes No
Explain 1-r () NQ f i ' f ( I -II ►' /. / ,l. / a l ._",
•
L. Is this variance required for a reasonable economic return from the subject prope
or is the existing structure too small? No
Explain: I \' ' '1,44104' j Aa ". ..d
. 1..1 t, V'
19
M Did the practical difficulty which caused you to apply for this variance exist
before you owned the subject property? - Yes No
Explain: Q.4 tyi &te 1 ' ;t''1"`itt p( . 1 ( , . lif ''`
-f t .
N. If approved, would this variance affect land use density regulations which exist
to protect the Rathdrum/Spokane Aquifer? Yes No
Explain: L. t / / I / ,
holt ECc �1 < ,
The following r
wat
o ng space is for further explanation. Your application will get better consideration if
what, how, and why you propose your application is clear. Attach an additional page(s) if needed.
You are invited to present additional photographs, diagrams, maps, charts, etc. in support of
this application (we have the equipment to display video tapes). No such additional material
is required and in any case it must be BRIEF and descriptive of issues which need to be
considered in relation to this requested variance. If you have questions about the procedure
to be followed feel free to contact the Spokane County Planning Department (456-2205).
Page 2