SP-78-23
amoov*
P
+
~
~
(Or
~
~
,
,
~
~
BEFORE THE SPOKANE COU?VTY SHORT PLAT ADtiTINSTRATOR
IN THE MATTER OF SHORT )
PLAT NO. Sk ?8'•OL3 ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
) CONCLUSION AND DECISION
THIS MATTER, an application for the approval of a short plat, pursuant
to Spokane County Resolution No. 78-291, came before the Spokane County Short
Plat Administrator on the &P Jt*"day of , 1978.
Havin•3 reviewed the records and files in this matter, the Spokane County
Shoct Plat Administrator rnakes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT AND C4NCLUSION
I
That appropriate provisions have been made for sewage disposal, water
supply, storm water control, circulation, fire protection, and other necessary public
faciliLies and utilities.
n
That the uses and der.sity proposed by the plat sponsor appear to be com-
patible with existing development in the immediate area as well as being compatible
with the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan.
III
That no significant adverse environmental impact will likely result from the
approval of this prnp; sal.
Therefore, the Spoyane County Short Plat Administrator hereby issues this
DEC ISIO N
Short Plat Application as submitted by the applicant is hereby approved
subiect to conditions which shall be complied with by the applicant and/or sponsor
prior to finalization of the short plat.
DATED this -?D Jo-day of 01978.
.
~
Spokane County Short Plat Administrator
~ %
Transamenci Transamerica
Ti1te Insurance Company
Trtle Insurance Services North 720 Argonna Road
• ~ ~ Spokane, Washington 99206
~ (509) 922-2222
CERTIFICATE TO PLAT
Order No. 89310-M
~ . .
• Certificate for Filing Proposed
SPOKANC CUUtir i Y Plat of BOBBI'S T4t0 LOTS
PLANNIP,G DEPARTMENT
Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington
Gentlemen:
In the matter of the plat submitted tor your approva] , this Company
has exarnined the records of the Caunty Auditor and County Clerk of
Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United
States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination
hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate
in Spokane County, to-wit:
Lots 1 and 2 of FINAL SHORT PLAT NO. 78-023, more particularly
described as follows :
The South 203 feet of the North 304 feet oF the East 143.33 feet
of Tract 215 of,eVERA, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0"
of Plats, page 30 ;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN : Hat-1ES1'E-AD CONSTRUCTION, INC.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. 1% excise tax, if unpaid.
2. General taxes for the year 1978 delinquent in the amount of
$124.34 plus interest. (Parcel No. 26544-0217)
3. Liability to future assessments by Vera Irrigation District No. 15.
4• Contract between Vera Electric Water Company, a corporation,
D. K. MeDonald, A. C. Jamison, Andrew Good and Vera Land Cornpany,
a corporation, dated April 25, 1908, and recorded in Book "EI" of
Contracts, page 292, providing for construction of ditchesA flumes,
pipe lines, etc., caith right of ingress and egress to maintain
said flumes, pipes, etc., and providing for lien for unpaid charges
€or such service. Reference is made to the record of said contract,
filed April 25, 1908, as Document No. 200528.
( cont inlae
11 -
• - `
P-age 2
Order No. 89310-M,
Records examined to May 2'5, 1978 at 8:00 A.M.
T~ ' RICA TITL NSURANCE COMPANY
I
B .
~
.cc: Mike Senski
mw '
d
~
~
~
~
~
,
' ••M~1~~~. .'1•T~ J.: '~I . . • . ' 1 ' .
~ . • J~
. 1 • a4~~ f Q. +t - • . ~I ~ • • • . • • .
t~ .,•.wt'~~ e~u~ r'~..f} . ~ ~ . . . ~ . , . .
u~~~ . I AfT lt ' ~ . ~ - ~ . , • . ~
t~ • + . , 1 ~ ~:'t ~ ~ .
y ,ti ~ ~.r~:. ; ,Y~- . . • . ~ . . ' ' , ~ „ . . , : - ~
' • . + • ;A _ ' ~ _ . , ! ~ . . . ~ ~ . , q , .
~
~ yll ~ . ' • • .
_ . . : . • ~ ,
~ , ~ _ . - • . , - ~
. , , • ~ . ~ - -
. . ~ .
" . ,
O
.007.do . ~ .
K ,4
~ ~ I `r '{.1 . •~-y.~
~ ,
.
.
~ ~
' . ; ' . , .t i... ~ _ . 1 t ~ ~ 1~'.:!'l • ~ J;
' . - - ~ 'I~~~ ~ ' • f, ~
. _ . ; •
,
.
o . ~
.4
► fi ;
~ ~q5. 17 75-~• ~ : ~ , . ~ ~ ,
r. ,
.
~ - ,
~8 ~ • ~ ~g
- - ~ ~
r --6j
22p Q
z,
r v I .
~ ~ .
. ~
iANSAWhICa 1itt~ INSUfillNff. COMPANY
NvR i H 720' ARC.(?NNE Rn4D ~
SPOKaNE, wA 99206 ~
~ w E • ~
s
ptU~l 1! ~:n tt 5r.1' ly' 1►'# :'+r 2111; 1.- 01 i:,•.F;LrR
1t r 14 '1: a ~p Or',fIptO.L (lU
`1I,ly Iw wiatwnia, il evr. m d,nirm-um •rM
'Aliun sSrw t."Iv f tj~ tc l uAl aw:► t
4p
~ - : .
Conditions of Approval for Short Plat
NOTE: Those checked are applicable
A. Conditfons
S1 That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record
and/or attached sheets as noted.
2 That a statement be placed in the dee-ication to the effect that no more
than one dwelling structure be placed on any one Iot, nor shall any lot
be further subdivided for the pucposes of creating additional lots or
building sites without filing a replat.
S3 That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the
preliminary plat of record.
4 That approprlate provision be made that the following described property
be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or
deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or
border the plat boundary. (Temporary cui de sacs are required when
s treets termina te a t the pla t boundarie s.)
SS That appropriate street names be indicated.
06 That appropriate utility easements be fndicated on copies of the approved
preliminary plat for distrlbution on the Planninq Department and the utility
companies. Wrltten approval of the easements by the utility company
must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
S7 That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning D?partmznt pcior to
the filing of the final pIa t.
S8 That an avigation easement satisfactory to the Spokane Airport Board be
provided for the benefit of Fairchild Air Force Base and Spokane Inter-
national Airport.
S9 That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of
right of way to the public and appr^~•aI of the road system in the plat by
the County Engineer.
S10 That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centec-
line and curb grades be submitted to the Cvunty Engfneer for approval
prior to construction and the ffling of a final plat,
S11 That drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and
alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for
approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat.
S12 Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be
performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who
shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of
suvey mflnuments which may be dis h.ss- bed during cons truction and who shall
furnish the County Engineer wfth "As Built" plans and a certificate in
writing that all improvements ware installed to the lines and grades
shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments
have been replaced.
S13 No construction work is to be performed with the Public Riqht of Way until
a permft has been issued by the County Engineer. AlI work is su bject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
S14 All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior
to filinq the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County
/
~
Engineer to cover the cost of construction of impcovements, construction
certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines,
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
S15 No direct acess from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are
constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads.
SI6 No direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such tfine as
additfonal right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County
Roads.
S17 Road design, construction, and drainage control for 1/2 riqhts of ways
and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the developer.
S18 That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a
design proposal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed
State Higrhway-County Road intersection. State Highway Department
approval of the proposed design must be received pnor to the filing of
the final plat. Improvements to the Srate Highway are to be the :esponsi-
bility of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the
cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount
as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department.
S1?
. Existing county roads providing direct access
to lots of the plat shall be paved and4M curbed to the standards of the
County Engineer.
S20 That the following statement be placed in the plat dedication:
WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve,
maintafn, or otherwise service the private roads contained within or
providing service to the property described in this plat. By accepting
this plat or subsequently by allowing a building permit to be issued
on ptaperty on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for
said private road and ehe owners hereby acknowledge that the County has
no obligatfon of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine,
survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain, provide drainage or
snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run
with the land and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors
or assigns fncludinq the obligation to participate in the maintenance of
the priva te road a s provided herein.
S21 That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewaqe
_ disposal systems .
S22 The dedicatory language of the piat will state the sponsor will assume
no responsibility for provision o# damestic water.
S23 That conditional approval be given subject to provisions in the plat for a
public sewer system. Approval of the design of said systems must be
given by County and State Health authorities and the County Utilities
Dapartment prior to filing of the final plat. A suitable guarantee will
be required to cover the cost of providinq said system in the amount as
determined by the Public Works Department.
S24 That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that a public
sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual setvice
will be provided to each lot prior to sale.
S25 Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that
the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water
dis trict .
S2 That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by the
Spokane Countp Health District prior to filing of the Final Plat.
I~
)
S27 That a plan for water facilities adquate for fire protection be approved
by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must
also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The
health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) , and fire protection district
will certify, prior to the filing of the ffnal plat, on the face of said
water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and
will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and
certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
S28 The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a
copy of safd water plan tha t appropriate contractual arrangements have
been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in
accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time
schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for aompletion
of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities
prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual
arranqements will include a pcovision holdinq Spokane County and the
purveyor harmless from claims by any lot puchaser refused a building pec-
mit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorlly complete the
approved water system.
29 The plat dedication will contafn a statement to the effect that the public
water systerri as approved by County and State Health authocities and
the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat,
and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as
well as fire protection to each Iot prior to sale of each lot.
S30 That the provfsions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pusuant to 43.21C 080
RCW and the Board of County Commissioners; Resolution No. 77-1392 be
accomplished by the project applicant wfthin thicty (30) days of fornial
action by the Short Plar Adminsitrator or before the filing of the final
plat; as instructed by the Planning Department.
S31 That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to buy 1L.MW
S32 )Roadway Improvement Required:
~ public road standards
priva te road s tandard s
~ 3 That a survey be required prlor to the €iling of a final plat.
S33 Other:
(V Dl~~~MW ar !e-* a eaMeOvr1L Gui4y .ksAVA
Pao-oAMss zoukjo 2M- ~fe
A1S1M1S .elMW m Oi4Pr/eL./dj►L~ iN IUff7' Dk
P~sr 4 N R 1l~ A N Pt=,et:r.r Qb ♦
Approved this day of 1978.
. .
PA& or a mnsraor
cc: Health District
Engineer
Utilities
Applicant
Surveyor
File
~ '~~A`T'Y ~NG :~R
SrOKl1NE COUNTY, W/1SHINGTON
Doft &`...~N fo , 1da
tnter•OfHta COIA11!1YAiC0tf011 E C E i V E ' ~
rQ pLAt~1iNG COt4tISS ION GARY KENNALY. PLANNING 6 TRAFPIC DIVISIQN ENGINBSRb44(C• "~"Y
,.A
~twbj.c• go n oaunlITON ~ F4B S? OMI$ _ Q 2,3 .
7 N A I T I O N S C I R C L E U A P P L Y T O P L A T U N U E R C O N S I~ E R A T I O N p L A P; Z G D~ PAR TME NT °
RiQA.tG 9440 STANOA&OS p&%VATE RAS►O SrAW4AIW1X .
z t _ that eonditionsl approval of the plat is givao subject to dadication oF Right of
Way and appcoval of the road systea in the plat by the County Enginear;
.
E 2-that plaas, proFilse, and cross 9ections shoving proposed etreet centerline and curb
grades be subfnitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construct.ioo and
the filiag of a fioal plat; , .
3-that draiaage plaas and de9ign ealculatioos ehovieg the grades and aligmeot of dYafn-
age sacilities be submitted to the County Engineer For approval prior to coastsuction
and the filing of a Eiasl plat; .
E 4- cons truction within the proposed public s treets and easemsate shall be perfarcied
under tfie direct eupervi9ion of a licensed laad surveyor. who ehall be reepoasibla
for perpatuating all evid0ace of ths location of survey awnumeata ahich piay be
disturbed dusing constsuction and who shall furniah tha Couaty Ettigiaser with "As
.Suilt" plaas and a cettificate ia uriting that all improvemente aare installed to
the line9 and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all distwcbed
taonumants hav4 bQea teplaced;
E 5-no construction work is to be performed withio the Public 8ight o! Way notil s gercnit
has bean 1s9uad by the County zngineer. All work is eub ject to iuspactutt and spproval
by the County Engineer;
F_ 6-all construction vithin ths Public Right of Way f9 to be completed prior to filing
the final plat os e bond ie the anount estimated by tha County Eogineer to eover the
e09t of coa3ttuction of improvzments, construction certification, "As Built" plaos,
and monu.~asnting the atreet centerline' shall be filed with ehe County F.agir.aer.
L 7-no direct accese Erom lots to 1/2 right of ways until auch time es edditionel right oF
waye ere dedicet,ed and roeds are estebliahed ee County Rueda.
•
L 8-no direct access Erom lota to Stub Roed connectione until such roade ere conetcucted
to County Standard9 and eeteblished ee Councy Roads. 6 9-roed deitgn, OFMO 1~~ conetruction, and drainege control for 02 righte of ways
and Stub Road conneetion9 are the cesponeibility of the Developec.
= 10-that the SpoQeoc ahell prepsre and eubmit to the County Bngineer a deoign proposel ecce+ot-
able to the State Highway Department of the propoeed Stete Highvay-Couoty Road intera
eection. State Highvey Oepertment epprovet of the propoeed design must be cecetved prio~
to the filing of tbe final plat. Improvemente to the State HighWay ate cv be the respon-
eibility of the Sponeor and mey elthec he conetructed or e bond to cover tha coet of such
improvemente futniehed to the County Engineer in the emount ae determined by the County
Engineer and the Stete Highway Department.
A
~ ta
Existing CountY roacls providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be
.
paved end/ow curbed to the standards of the County Engineer.
~ 12 PArsPot~ 0 01t%d4T'W RroAO ~S) sLrR.u lwG , LoTt WITN : w/o EJCTLh/644
p01S1QALe' ; EX Tap/s104 'rb aEtuF $ oIt. Cfts C.DTS ~ .'=f/T✓RCa A/et,lt
11i i. 14T e R ww `T%,^tT.
TO-4^T Ptz.W.►,4 AoA►D(rj 8C 1•~PA4ve0 Tb sr.aft0*06 AooRWo Sv 7w filAwo
oF CovostY C&%...w..%1t~6WJML5,
U14 D~=DIC*T,oel o F I o~ 4jW/77of/A*C- A/6#T o= 4.44y/ 4[&4 PMA"M
l-oaD .
-r-µ,ar 710£ oU+#JeX I #/s &90*svr&9rS 0116vv 4ss*VWs 4"66 rO AIW9000ZF
A.ro #1a r 0Aw4lsrE ort f+/t+ resT oo*-► x/O ow a10 atC=A&o.
~ea~►E coG~ _ y rPj SPOKANE COUNTY :HEALT;N DISTRICT
Inter-Off,i ce Communi cation
~jN O~S
Date: May 25, 1978
T0: Spokane County Planning Commissfon
FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S.
SUBJ,ECT: SP 78-023 (8abbi Swanson)
1. Thia plat lies on the west side of Prog"ress Road 101 feet south of
'24th Avenue. The terrain is 0 to 5 percent grade. The soils are
Garrison.gravel (GgA) and shoul'd pose no drainage problem. Thete
are no known private,water supplies within 150 feet'of this plat.
Water eupply is furnished by_ Vera Irr,fgation. The data fTOm one
Vera Irrigation well located at 24th and Adams,showed the well to be
160 f eet deep and to deliver 3,000 gpm, with'a total nitrogen content
of 1.946 ppm. Using Todd's fornrula f.or projected incremental increase
of,8.6 percent, a 2.1101 ppm. range would result.
2. Reconnnend ttiat :
A. This plat not be approved unt-il written evidence is provided that
satisfactorq arrangements tiave been made for service from the'
water purveyor. .
b. All lots be served domestic use water by Vera Water and Power
Company prior to sale of lots.
c. Ttie pl.at be approved 'for , use of individual on-site sewage d isposal
systems.
d. An on-site sewage,disposal management system is required i.f more
then two (2) dwelling units are authorized in the plat. .
cc: Seneke an&Masgai
sm
,
~ , .
L
~LANN11jr ►;~.WTlv~~N-11
I
SCHD-ADM=118 . ,
. r' 'Y~1~, ' ~ ,
~
' ' + o~,••scis cy~
~CO'UNTY ENGINEER
.
- - ' RO BERT S.. TURN ER
'
COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOnr'NC COUhtY CUIJRI'HOUSt
Date
T0: Zon'ing, Administrator
Spokane Co,uat_y, Planning, Dep,t .
FROM : Courit}► Engineer"s Of f ice
Utilities Department
~
S.P. 7d -02'3
Tfie shor-t p1at r-eferenced •above has been reviewed. by ~ our s,taf f for its
i.aipact on the s-tom► drainage system. It wqef found that
No add'itional -storm,draina'ge construction is required.
The Eollowing action is necessary;
l - -
, - - _
Sincerely,
Wi-lliam R. DoUratz, P.E.
Asat°. Counky Engineer
~
By ~.EJames; A . Legit , ~
JAL/ tw- U111-t ies Engr.
cc : Caxy Kenna Iy„
2f .
r
~
Application for Shcrt SubdirisiQn Approval ~_4/3
PART oI+3E
(Ta be completed by appli-cant)
A. Applican,t' s -Name: ° e`s`~~ o
Adctre ss :
. Legal Owaaers Name :
AddFess : .
B. Phoae number where applicant can be reached: Z/O
C. Total Acraaga of proposal
D. Nuaiber of Lots r•~ . E. Typical ? ot size
F. Land Use PropoEed by applican.t: I ~V'- w ,
1
G. Method of t•,later Supgly: Individual Wells Pu.blic Systea
Private Gomcn~ty Syrtem ( Othnr ~ ) . (Describe)
H. MetYaod of Sewage DisDoseu.: Sspt+c Tank anc: Drainfield (c-:Lagoon t).
Treatment P?ant 4ther, or combination: (Deserihe)
1. List Utility Compani~s and/o^ Distracts e3mecte3 ta provide serlrice to this
=aDosa1. ;
ElectriZity Gas Water Phone
J. I;o you, or the ovmer in the eveet you do not own the sxb ject 'Larad, have any
pr.a.ns for futu.~^e a3d.~.t:.ans, e~/~~on, ai *wrt
~.er ~ct~.R~~t? r~late~i °~.tH th~~
propo~,1.? if yPs, exgl.ain:
K. D0 you ar the owneT, o«n or iQave optior.s on land nearby or adjacegt to this
proposal. 's location? If 3re. , exDlain:
L. SlamatiL'@
I, tn-e un3zr•i-zzed, swear un3er Peaa].t3- of perjuFy that the above respoases
are made tru4hfu],.1y and to the beist of my kno-alddge. Ialso und?rstand t'Zat,
shQUId there be 2ny wil.l.ful misrepresentat ~,an cr i-ri.? 1fui lack of full c~.sele-
sure on mg part, apokane County aay withdrwa aay approesl i t- caight izsue ir.
reliance ugon this applicati o.Y-1.
Date ji/ Prononent
Date (>dner
Date KotarS ~ -4
3e sieiing at ~
NOTARv .6FAL
- 1 -
. ~
~
r
PARfi TWO
(To be comn?eted by eurveyor.)
I, the undersigned, a liceased land surveyor, hame comgleted the 3.nformatioa requested,
and the Preliminary Plat has been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with
the r~ repapts of the Spokane County Short Plat Ordiaance and tLE laws of the State
of
'4 .
4• (Si.gned) Date :
■ - r~ Y -
s
► ~ 157 ~ 40 (Address) P~toae : 1
Vt a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g _ ~ • ~ o
iq Z. ~,p• ~
[
I#*skj4
• ~ y ~ • SuR
. /
~
PART T.ffi3EE
(To be com.pleted by Water Purveyor)
A. This subdivision (is) Ci4p-m94 satuated withia our service area.
B. We are (able) (ae6-eb~e) and ro~.-i.lling to supply thas eubd3vision *.th adequate wazer
for: (domestic) (fire) )(mmneres.wi) uses.
C. Satisfactory arrangementsClmws) (have not) been made to serve this proposal.
D. Sig;nature (only when items A, B& C are true and completed)
J
, k~~ E I ~ • '
purveyors r~eme si a.ad title date
-00/
. PAR.T FOUR
(To be completed by Fire District)
A. Thi.s subdivisio Cis t) situated withia our service area.
B. Adequate arrangement ave (have not) been made to meet our needs is provadi.ng
for an adeauate water system and facilities for fire p^atecti-on purgoses.
C. 5ignature (only when itecas A,B and C are true and completed) IZ2
Fire District ' si~ature and title date
PART FIIE
(To be completed by Heaith Diatrict)
A. Iiea].th District requirements for short plats hare (have not) been satisfied.
B. Si-gnature
~ f
signature and title date
PAR3 SIX
(To be completed by Flanning Dent. )
Date Subm? tted: f40 Ghecked by:
School District : File Number :
Existing Zoning: Date Establiz- ed:
- 2 -
\ -
~
~
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter=0ffi ce Communi cation
~rN p~s
Date: March 7, 1978
T0: Spokane Countv launing Cammission
~ ~ J
c IL t: V
FROM'. EuRene Sharp R.S. and Eugene C. Prather, S.
SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Plat - HOBBI'S TWO LOTS MAR 10 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY
1. References: P1ANNING DEPARTMEPJT
a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 20' by Senske 6 Masgai; undated, received by
this office January 23, 1978.
b. Groundwater ReBOUrces and Related Geologv North-Ceatral Spokane and South-
eastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Depaitment of Water Resources,
State of Washington, 1969.
c. The Effect of 'Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quali7ty in the_Spokane
Dalley, D. R. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metropol'itan
Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corpa of Engineers Seattle District, April 7,
1975.
d. Soil Survey, Spokaine County, 6daehfngton, Soil Consernation Service, U.S.D.A.,
March; 1968.
e. Spokane County, Washiagton Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation
Service, D..S.D.A., August, 1974.
f. Logs of Vera Water District wells in Township 25,Range 44, Section 9 b 4.
g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp, Spokane County Aealth District, January 16,
1978.
h: Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973 and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1473.
2. Topography, soils and water.
A. This project lies in a relatively flat area between 24th Avenue and 25th
Avenue on Progress Road. Local drainage waqs are insignif icant. It is
located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. No private wells found within
100' of plat.
b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravellq loam with 0 to Sx slopes.
They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible
contaminat'ion of groundwater.
c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial depoy$ite; stream-lafd sand and
gravel; contains some boulders in placea; iacludea some undifferentiated
glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked
by streame. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts
of water.
~
SCHD-ADM-118 '
~i
- •
-BOBBI' S TWO tATS
Page 2
March 7, 1978
d. The data from two Vera Water District wells in the area shows the wells
ate 160 to 175 feet deep aad deliver 3000 gpm. The total nitrogen level
was 2.02 ppm. The Vera Water District had,indicated that it can supply
domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements witb the
developer.
3. Impact discussion.
a. The p'lat sponsor has proposed taa lots on 0.66 acres. Each lot is to be
served bq a public water system and i[s individual on-site sewage disposal
system. This raiaes the question of significance of the impact on Che
groundeater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal.
b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps atudy, Dr. Todd conBidered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal rechatge to the groundwater,
and the effect of continued urban d'evelopment in the Spokane River Valley
upoa the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that:
(1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage
treatment effluent does teach and recharge the groundwater.
(2) All,dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the
groundwater. Aawever, bacteria and detergents (phoaphate pot-
tion) are mos[lp removed by ehe deep soil layer above the
groundwater and "minor disaolved constituents such as phoe-
phates,,which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates
wbich are taken up by plant roots" Will be lese than the total
found in septic tank effluents.
(3) "The cal'culated results at the,downstream end of groundwater flow
line indicate tbat the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concen=
tration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligramg per
liteT) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The
forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1
above the natural background."---"The analptical results of the
forecast impact of-year 2020 when compared with the present impact
both measured ia terms of leachate'volume and diseolved solida
concentration, indicate that the present impact on grourdwater
quelity is alteady s substantial proportion of the ultimate level."
c. Currently, results of chemical analysis,show the total nitrogen content of
the groundwater aa iu the range of 2.22 ppm. A projected incremental in-
crease using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 2.19
ppm. Current Federal aad State drinking water standards permit up to
10 ppm.
d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater
have the following,general characteri8tics:
(1) Collector and central tTeatment systems discharging to suYface
waters would require at least tertiaty treatment and perhaps
more to obtain a permit far the discharge from the Department
of Ecology. These systems are not currenCly economically availa-
ble for this project.
<
BUBBI'S TWO LOTS
Page 3
March 7, 1978
(2) Sealed syste.ms, Whether individual or„community, depend on
evaporation for liquid removal. Some, auch as lagoons, have
's'afety hazards associated with them and relatively poor com~
munity acceptance.
4. Recommend that:
a. A public water system including fire flows serve each lot to sale of the
-lo t .
b. Each lot be authorized the*e of an individual on-site sewage system„
~ , • s . _
c. An on-site sewage maaagement system be created and approved by this office
prior to the signing of the f inal plat if more than a total of four(4)
,dwell'ing units are authorized within the plat.
cc: SeASki & Masgai-Engineer, Inc. '
~
~ - -
~
r
R E C E ~ V E TFE3 2,~,. 3978
SPOKANC COUNiY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.
~
~~.:rwc EdUMN C~4at Mefst
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Introduction: The 3tate Environmental Policy Act of 1971, ChapCer 43.21C, RC'vv,
requires all stats and local governmental aqencies to consie3er environmentai values
both for their own actions and when licensing prlvate propasals.The Act also requires
ihat an Environmental TmpaCE Statement he prepared for all major actions significantly
(and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The
purpose of khis ctiecklist is to help the agencies invalved dQtermine whether or nflt a
proposal is such a major action. .40~
Please answer the following questions as compietely as ou can with s information
presently available to yvu. Please answer Questions as yes" or "m~.~}~ " if, in your
opinion, evea only slight impacts will re'4 . The revie rs of the rh►~c list wil] bs
aware of and concern themseives wfth the de ree of impac , askinq yau f more inf ma-
tion, if necessary, Where explanations of y answers a requfred ,or here y
believe an explanatfon wou d be helpful ta go rnment doct ion--makers includ your
explanation in the space p e use addi ional a es, f neces ry. Y should
include references ta any r pores r s es of hich you ar aw and w h are
releaant to the answers yo pro ' e. Co leCe nswers t e questi s now wil]
help all agencies inval.ved th ur propa al to ndertake [he raquir environmAntal
review wit ut unneces sa d ela .
The fo3lowin quesE-#ons ap y to our total opos , not just the license for whiah
you are curre tly applying the roposal fo which approv is sought. Your answers
shauld includ the impacts hich will be ca sed by your oRosal when it is cQmpleted,
even thouqh ao pletion ma not o cur untii nmetime the future. This wi.ll allow all
of the aqenoies hfch will e inv ved to c mplete C fr environmental review now,
ivithout duplicat paperw k in th futur .
No appllcation sha be pro essed until the c cklist has been completed and retumed
to the appropriate C nty d partment. Sta t aw requires explana tiens for euery "yc-s"
and "maybe" answec the hecklist. T person completino Che form may be required
to provide explanakions or no" answe , and tn samp cases, rnore detalled informatlon
to aid in a threshold det mt atfon.
NOTE: This Is a stand$rd fa ng used by all staee and local agencies ir, the Stace
of Washington for vari s types of proposals. Many of the qnestions may not
apply to your proposIt a question does not apply, just answer it "na" and
cantinue on to rhe tixt question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECIQ.IST FORM
1. BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent: Bo' i~ans n
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Et, 'l 3;)okn n~
3. Date Checklist Submikted: -2e,b,s.._I o 1 27LO,
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spvkane Countv, Wa.
5. Name of ProFosal, if Applicable:
Dobb.i. Is Tz•xea Lpt:
CIF SPACE FOR F.XPLANATION IS INADBQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
6. Nature and Brief Descrlption of the Proposal (including but not llmited to its size,
qeneral design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under-
standing of its scope and nature):
Cr, ga.ti-on of tw~ bi,.::.1 ' nZ ot sal ontr exi~tin!z countv rijzht
aT way' Area ~Ire~.d•J sPrved b•~ water. ~:lec-r~.c tei~~hana
uti? itv corr.nanies.
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the
extent of the land area affected by any enuironmental lmpaets, including any other
informa[ion neected to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setCinq
of the proposal):
oOnuth af 2,1,~.~h at ProZross alana countv road svstem in
open field nreviouslv used for ar.ricultural DurDQJes,
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal:
Ji= 1978
9. I.ist of aIl Permits, Licenses or Gavernment Approvals Required for the Proposal
(federal, state and local - inciuding rezones): '
P3at - Smokane Ccsunttv P1anniM; Car:missionrEoard of County Co:,-~
Roads - Spokane County Lngineers
Septic Tanls - apdkane 84unty ~fe-alth liistrict
Duilain~ permits - Spol~~.nc C~a~t;~ ~:~.~.ild~.ng De~zt.
lpa. Do you,or the owner !n the event you do not own the subject land, haue any
plans for future additions, expansian, or iutther activity related to or con-
nected wlth thts proposal? If yes, explain:
r~ o
lOb. Do you own or have options on Iand nearby or adjacent to this proposals
locatton? If yes, explatn:
Z+ :.crgs fcr sinjj P iise
11. Do you know of any plans by others lncluding the owrter which may affect the
property aovered by your proposal or land adiacent or nearby? If yes, exptain:
~ 12. A[tach any ofiher application form that has been compleCed regardfng the praposal;
if none has been completed, but fs expected Co be #iled at sorne future 3ate,
describe the nature vf such applicat.ion form:
I'lnne .
H. ENIVIRONIVIENTAL TMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
Yes Maybe iVo
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changee in geologic
structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
(b) Disruptians, displacements, compection or overcovering
of the soil? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ~
~
x _2_ _
~
(IP SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS IrTADEQUATE, PLEA8£ ATTAGH ADDITIOATAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe No
(c) Change in topography or qround surface relief features? X !
(d) The destruction, covering or modificaaon of any unlque
geologic or physical features ? . . . . . , . , . , , X
(e) Any increase in wfnd or water ervsion of snils, either
on or off the site? ~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
(f) Chanqes in depositton or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosfon which may
modify the channel of a rfver or stream or the bed of
the ocean or any bay, fnlet or lake ? . . , , , , , , x
Explanation: Cqnstrtict i on of ]aui1 ti i ri es and ronrl s~~i
.hnrrgAr. i n i:n1anrr;;t1113Z i n raA,nr_1y_.. eyery sguare fc:nfi nf t„ p`j,.
However, . lar,.dn.anirg shn»1 d rp..p-stab1 i -ab rftnbl W; l r.nn ".L3* ~3'1S.
Y= Milyhp Ro
2. Air. Will the proposal result iz1:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?
(b) The creation of abjectionabie odars? . . , , , , , Z-
(c) nlteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either l.oaaily or regi.onally? ~
E_, xp.lanatian: Additi nriL).. hnusinr, in this area will r~sult_irs _
:~s~.~~~~~s~ ~-r.~f~..,•._.~~-s-_a_-~~~'~ nZ._tJ1j,,s i=~~~e v."iIJ
,-:;iIlp1y_ he3=Al act'ti23__Q.f ~ ~ 't on c ~mir-ces an
ir=cI"nas.a-will_~e_incicl=tal f.n_thr!- Qti°eral i met._ror)o r~ ~ -r~a
_ -
3. Water. Will the proposal result in: yes Maybe No
faj 4hange in cia.n-ents, or the coucse or direcUon of
wa ter movements, in either marine or fresh waters x
(b) Chanqes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and arnount of surface water runoff
(c) A1Ceratians to the course or flow of flood wate*s?
(d) Change in the amount oi sucface water in any water
body ? b,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(e) Discharge into surtace waters, or in any alteration
of su.*face water quality, including but nor limited
to temperature, dissolued oxygen or turbidity? X
(f) Alteration o# the direction or rake of flow of ground
wa ters ? . . . , . . . . . 00 . . . . . . . . _ x
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
af an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . x ,
(h) D.---terioratian in ground water quality, eithar through
diracr injectton, o; through the seepage of Ieachate,
phoz-p3tes, detergenks, waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters ? . . , . , , _ Y-_ y
(i) Reduvtion in the amounC of water otherwise available
for pub2ic water suppltes? . . . . . . . . . . , . . x _
Explanatian: increc-4sed population vrithin -uhis orolect az•ea v,ill
~-.„a~;~ ~:~~~a~r►~~ nr~ t s
Greate a Z ' hP vta _r `;pplt ~ n.3tsteg~ l•I~.t.C h
af tjlis demand is simplv a reloc-ution of the dem:izcl ;:i.thin
_thft metxa'coli~ a-n area♦
-3-
(ZF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUA?iL PLEASE ATTACH ADDI'tIONAL PAGES,)
Yes Mavbe Nu
4. Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Ctiange tn the dfversity of species, or numbers of
any s pecie sof flora (includinq trees, shrubs, gcas s,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . , . . .
(b) Redu :tion of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? . . . . 0 . , , , . . , ~
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
ar in a barrier to :he normal replenishment of
existing species ? . . . , , . . . , , , , , , ,
(d) Reduction in acreage of any aqricultural crop ? . . . . . _
Explanation: LesS rl-ian onE acrc o-f a,rxicultural land tNil1 oe
r moved from r,-uction -bgLt f_ror:► an ineffi,ciept aized
Yes Mavbe No
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers ot
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, bent'hic orqanfsms,
insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(b) Reduotion of the numbers of any unique, rare, or
endangered species af fauna? . . . . . . . . . , . ~
(c) IntroducEion of new species of fauna into an area , or
result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . x
(d) D`tenioration of escisting fish or v+rildl.ife habitat? _?f
Exp lan3 ; ion:
Yes Mavbe N3
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?. y
Explanation: From a rmicro'l Tjo3nu of view, nuise leveIs will
increase. The exter:ct of in~Dact vlill Ue minimal ancl will be
nartiallv abated as ornamenta1 shrubs, trEes ancl PlantinF-s
create an accvustical effect.
Yes Maybe No
7. Light and Glare. Vilill the proposal prUduce new light or glare?
Explanation: Aciai-tional housinM i-ri.th associated ni*1ht liphts and
automobile lightsi•ri? 1 cr~ate more% li:-~7t arir3. .-1arE than is
~
_gresentl~,,,~roduced frars the site. "Lhp -►mnac~ ~is i-ns; gln.3.fin~t.
Yes Mavbe No
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
-
present or planned land use of an area ? . . . . . . . . . . ,
Explanation: Present use wjJ2 ne
_ajtwrPd trj rP-si dPnt? a1 use L-ather
than nrrri n»l ts rr;;l_ 76'-~ nn i mr.a r.t t-in liP Prrvirt~TTIllerit.
`
-4-
~
~
~
~
(YF SPACE,F+OR-EXPLANATIOIV'I3 INADEQUATE, PLEAS'E ATTACH, ADDITTO.NAL PAGES.)
Yes Mavbe No
9. 14atural Resources`. Wfll1he proposal re-sult 10.:. "
(a) Tncrease~ in the ra;te of use of, aby nakural res'ources IL
(b)' Depletion of any nonrenewabla •natural resource,? . . . . ~
IIxplana tion: .
Ye's Maybe N-i
}2 0. i k of TJvset. Does, the prraposal invol've,a zisk of an ~
expldsion;,or the relrease bf hazardous substances (including.
,tiut nQt limited [o„ oi2, pesticide's, ch0micals., or'radia'tion),
in'the event of an accident or upset conditfons•?....... ~
Explanatfor: -
Yes Maybe No
11. Population. WfY`1 the proposa2 alter the, Ioca;tion, -
distribution, density, or growkh rate, ot the humAn
popula tian of an ared? . , . , . . . . , . . . . . . . _ ~ _ _ -
Explaatatiom, Much ai the in.crease in popul.ation is arE,sult in.
reloca'tion tqithin the met•rorolitan area within the state or' _
wi h i n P. U,1i t.Pd_2t atea, Thi_Q Uri 1 altet, firhe matulation
densItr- oF the AroiDct sit.c; but will have l.ittle affect if ar~p
on the huuaan popul.ation of the meL-rovolit~Ln ar'ea sursQixra.ding:.
12. .Housina.. Wi1L the proposal affEet exist#ng bousing,; or
~arEate a demand for additionaI housing ? . . . . . . . . ~ -
Exaalanation: The same aLs~er fr.Qm ;~11 abdv'p- alon1 i,,ap ,to haiAajri&.
Yes, May4?e Xo
13. Tfiansporcation/Clrcula,tior. tiVill the proposal result in':
(a) Generation of 4ddirlona,l vrihiaulac'inovemPnk? . . . . . X
(b) EffecGs en wcis'tirig parking fa.cilities, or dernand for •
new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . x
(c) lmpact upon exisring transportation systerns? x
,(d) AlteraEions te present patterhs b,f ci"rculation or
x
.movement of people, arid/or goods ? . . . . . . . . •
(e) Altera tf ons to. wa terborne,, ra il or air.tra ffffc x
(f) Increa-se in traffic hazards to, motor vetiicles,
bicycl.ists ar pedestrians?. . . . . . . , . . . • . _ ?x -
F,xplanaeion: The coacept of ItffilCZ'oil '3:mpact ver_sus 'area vl.ide impact
is impor-tan-t to :understa.nd ir!, atddressing L"he transpartation/
ti~a_A is3b. i:hP -Y.miediate~ vicin:itv will be '
1• ta~=*, hak.cevpr. ~ip ovPral mO'tropol,i~,i, .a.re~a ~.l
2211'~r'; i ~.~r~
nrst be impacted From a pro ject of thi-s siZe.
- S -
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATIQN IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE A'tTACH ADDITIOIVAL PAGRS.)
Yes 1Viavbe iyo
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, ~
or result in a need for new ar alcered governmental services
in any of the following areas ?
(a) Fire protection? . , . , , , , , , . . , . , , , x _
(b) Police protection? . . . , , , . , . . . . , . .
(c) Schools ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x -
(d) Parks Ur other recreational facilities? . . . . , . . 0 __Z _
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads x _
(f) O ther governmantal services ? . . . . . . . . . . . x _
Exnlanation: ihe local fire, school, anCt road districv will be
-3 j~act pd Yav a,rirlit i_or~n1 Lniin,; a ~Qntj1-~ jion and rozids. The
effect vaill be Offset ta some d;~~~ree bv addltional tay. revenues
ZeLcr"fi r-_d_
Ye s Maybe No
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x
(b) Demand upon existinq sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of eneragy? x
Explanation:
Yes Maybe No
16. Utilfties. Will rhe proposai result in a need far new
systems, or alterations to the following ukilities;
(a) Power or na tural ga s ? . . . . . . . . . , . . , , X
(b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _X
(o) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , dL
(d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
(e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . , . . . , . . . . x _
(fl Solid wa ste and dispasal ? . . . . . . . . , . . . 2L
Explanation: All utilities will Le impacted ; however, 1ariniari1v
throtgh es~en`jon of n-xist~.nr s,ystems rather th~= stnew" Qr
a1tEred sys em„D,, SEwage clisuosal r- siteland storm Lyatqr
cirp- nngp wil lhp rP-qlsi rta-ri
Yes Maybe No
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any health hazard ar potential health t azard (excluding
men ta 1 heal th) ? . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .2L
Explanation: The ansYrer is based nn available facts and the lack
o.~ anv definitive evirtence on~~~ ~ r1h=.
-6- -
~
I
;s
' •
II.F SPACE FOR EXPIANAT.ION ISz IN'ADEQWATE,, P;.EASDrATTACH ADDIfiiONAL PAGES
Yes Maybe, No
18'. Aesthetics.. Wi'll' the,proposal result in the,obstru'tztian of
any sceccic vista,br view open to th'e public, ,or arill the pro=
posalresulC in the crea,tion of an aestb;eti'cgtlly,otfensive .sI.[e
Qpen Fa publ'ic view?' . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , ~
Explana rion: .
Yes_ M-aybe No'
19. RecreaEion. Willthe proposa'I result in an i ' mpa _c,t upon' the
9ualily or quainti,ty of, exis,ting r,ecceatioiaal,oppoctunities ?
Explanation:
Yes iviaytie No.
20. Archeoloqical/Nistor-ical. Wrll the prop.osaa r,e'suXt -in an
alEeration oi' a significant archeofogicnl or historical site ~
struCtureobject or,builcling? . . . . . . . : . . . . ~
Explanation:L
M. SIGNATtIRE
I~, the undersIgned, swear under;the penaYty of penury that the above responses are
irnade truthfully and . to, thP best of my knowTedge: I also understarid that, should "ttiere be
any wUlful misrepresentation or, willful lack o f' full disclosure an my part, Spokane Gounty
may wtthdraw any dcclarattorr of,-nonsignificance that tt miqht_ lssu'e= in reliahi_csz;upon thi s
. checkli.st o Date: Proponent: - - -
(Pleas'e F'rint or Type)
.
Proponent: Homestead 'Construction ; Inc, _
Addres~~ : R~ s 7 ,'5~o~ ka n ~ } ~ta ~ - AA ~ - -
Phone: _
Person completing form: Nlichael L-._ S~enske
Phone: 92h.-3759
Date: - -
Dzpt. -or O#fi'ce of 'Coun,ty-Review.i.ri'g Chpcklist: - -
Staff `Member(s) Reviewing 'Ghecklist: -
° ~171r~
-
-7
R E C E I V E
FEB 2 1 1978
E X H I B I T A SPOKANE COUNTY
PRII,IMIDIARY PIAT APFLICATION FOF~+I PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AREA AND DISTAI`CE ■ooooo00oooooaoaoooaooooo00000000000000oooooaooooo00oooooaooooo
Total. -runount of land in this Subdivlsion.: tb6 Acres
Proposed densaty of t.he P1,-3 F: 3 Lots/Gross Acre
'1'otal aruount of aajoining land contralled by this owner or ,ponsor: 2*3'~ Acres
Proposed use of controlled adjoi-ning la..nd: ainglP fami 3t _g-iclPnti~l
WZiat is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station: ~
Shopping facilities? 2 Municipal Boundary: S Faved street or highway? p
LAND USE NOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOot3OOOOOOOOOOOOOOoOOOOOOOODOODO0000
Indi cate the proposed land use of the plat : Single Family I?we1.1 inrs l x).
Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes:
Multi-!'wrtily dwelling uni ts ( Iildicate whicYi Lats:
Mobi? e Ilome~: ( Oi,he-r• ( Describe otrier 1.,es:
Describe any non-residentlal use proposed in the Plat:
What. as t;he pz•esent use ol the pi•operty pr. oposed tu be platted?
List type af lises: C-Lilti-vated land: acres. PasLure: • acres.
TirnUer: acres. Vaca:zt: acres. Other: Acres
I c keeping of aiiima'ls de.-? ?^ed? No C X). Yez-z ( T~-pe:
II4IPRDUIIKENTS ■ooooooooaaaoaooooo0oooooaooooo0oooooaooaooooooaooooo00000000000000
Do you plan to i'ils the P? at in itv entirety ab pr~oposed, or -,rill i,i: be a rnulti-phase dev-
elo}amen t? Fnt-ifi y ,
To what Ievel of improvernent will streets be consf:!•ucteci? Gravel ( x)- Ilinimume
Curb ariii Gravel ( Curb a.nd Paved (
Describe any combinations of above:
What is the time period expected for complete develupment of the Plat: 0
Stree t;:mprovements completed? 6 mo5. . Substantial number• of lots dccunied mOS:
Is dedi-,ation of an,y land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.)
No. ( X Yes ( Describe:
Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1?5n Scaudre feet
Number of bedrooms
Will buildings be built on the lots before they are cold: Nn ( Yes ( X).
Will any special deed re strictions be incZudpd in t~t.- sale of lots? No (X Yes (
If "yes", exglain:
oTILITIES ■ooooo0000oooooaooooo000000oooooaooooooaooooo0000000000000000oooK3oMoo
Indicate the proposecl rnei;hod of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( x~. Lagoon (
Treatment piant ( Other, or combinations (Describe)
Indicate the proposed source of wate.r suprly: Inclividual wells ( Public system ( X).
Private 4ommwnit,y system ( ) .
Indicate method of extending service to ttYe 7ots (Dwellings):
Underground utility easements ( Overhead utility easements ( x).
Utilities in streets ( No easements (
Indicate the dista.nce from L-his proposal i:o the nearest existing water main: 0 feet
Indicate size of nearest main: 8 Inches.
List utility companies or clistricts expected to provide service to thi6 Plat:
Electrir.ity: lem Gas: _ Watea• : vaxp Phone: PI'TB
• ; . .
E X H I B I T A Page 2
' PRELIMINARY PLA7.' APPLICATION FORM (Continueci)
ACKN4WLEDGMENTS ■oooooooopoooaooooo0oooooaooooo0000oooooaooooo0000000000000000000
PROFOSED PLAT NAME : Bobb i t s Two Lo t s
I, the undersigned, have completed the information reauested, and the PrPliminary Pla.s tras
beeiz prepared by me under my supervision in accordance wi th the requirements of the Spokane
County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington.
D.
_ , pF wASyj (Signed) Date:
.
(Address) t Phoae :
157 40
Zip :
.
°y•.'~FCrs~~~°.•~ ~a
.
tANO~ S
SURVEYORI ."Sm:
please Drint
the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am ttie
(owner builder C agent ( option holde contract holder (
of the proper•t,y proposed to be platted and ha e e he information requested of ine and
do hereby testify that it is correct and • te f ~
(Signed) Date:
(Address) Phone:
Zip:
.
. NOTARY ' Date:
NOTARY SEAL:
Speeial Comnients:
■ooooo0000000000000■ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNIlVG DEPARTMENT ■000000ooooo0000000•
PLANNING DEPARTMENT INFORMATI4N
Date Submitted: , Checked by:
School District: Preliminary Plat Fee: Existing Zoning: Date established:
Zone Change File No.: Advertised Zone IIpgrading:
Number of Lots: Location: Section Township Range
Pla.t File No.: Plat Name:
<:-oil 210
January 24, 1978
Planning Director
Spokane County Planning Commission
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
RE: BOBBI'S TWO LOTS
Dear Sir:
This letter is to verify that the above property lies within
our boundaries and Vera Water and Power District can supply
power and water to the above providing the developer complies
with the District's policies, rules and regulations.
Sincerely,
v
Ti+Tilliam J. Job ~ -
Assistant Manager
db
#132
#950.78
cc: Dennis Kroll, Spokane County Health
Mike Senske
R E C E I V E
FEB ? 11978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
yp00
-
oa.
~
- . _ tg~._ _ j"' _
~
~ . . . ~ I .
~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~v~r~~~ 1~
~
k ~ ~ =
~ ~ ~ ~
;
, ~ -
,
~ i .
~ ~ n w
„ I ++i4 e ; ,
~ t ; ti I 1 ~ ' .J~,.IIV ~
I , 1l~ 3 '-c 'r ' i~ I '~f I I ic 1 ~ ~ 1 4
`5
I ~ ~ ~ ~ • * i ~ A"~' I t~\ . I..a-
- I ~
~ . 4
~i.
~
r"~, , i_ - ~
1 5 ' 1 ~ I ~ 1 iMM ~ 11 u1
1 / 2 ,"`Y ~l
~ ~~fyl
~1 i ,
~ a ~ ~ k~ ,k~ . ~ a
~ ~ ii ~o ~ . ,
V - ~ ~
' 4 ~ ~
~ ~
, ` f ~
, y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r _
. . . _
~ r,~
Y . ~ 1j~
~
~
~
~
~ ,
~
~
^,~`'r
~ Q ~ ~ .
~
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
_ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ ~ - = - s . _ _ ,
~
l~'} _ ~ ~
~i
I~ ~ F i `
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ _ - - ~ C~ ~ ~f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,2 4P ~
~ , , v f
~ ~ q - J~ 12 I
, I ~
~ r ~i ~ ~ ~ I~
~ p f ~ [ ~ r c} 1 g-~ .
~ ~ ~G I~~V i a4'( I ~ ~ , ~ ` II~
~
~ ~PO~f~N~ C{~~~I ~I C~~l~iTY ~ . ~l4~ ~ -PLA~f - - ' - - T ~ - I~ ~ f~G Q E'P T i' ~ E-~ r--- , _--r- _ ~~~'N~#C f~ AR ~
~
~ X ! 1 ~ I
; ~ ~ ~ _
~ ~ + ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ I
I ~ ~ ~ 3 ~
! , ~ ~
i ~ I ° $ , ~ ~5 ~
~ ~ ~ . ~ -
- - ~ - _ _ ~ , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ r~ , ~ t ~ + ~ ~ r
s ~ ~ . I ~
1 1 - ~ I I
, 4 ~ ~
~ - ~ i ~ ~ l
9 ~ _ ~ ~ ~ I ~ r~~ H i ~ .
~ ~ ti ~V I ~ a• l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~
i, ~ I n ~ i A ~ ~ . r~~ T _ I'~~~~41 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
~ 'Y~ ~ ~ ~r+ ~ i . y i t ! w ~ ~ . t "C~ - .~r# ~ . ~ "x
_ _ . - - . _ - ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,~t~ ~ 64~ ~c l ~ i
, ~ f i~° ~ ~
r ~ - 'Y ` . - , . . ~e ~ i, ~ ~ ~ ~i ~
~ ~ l r ~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ' , ~p
~ ~ ~ t ~ r ~ I ~ ~
~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i - ~ ~ !
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 t ~ ~
, r
~ ~o T ~ , ~
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ Rl ~I
~ ~--1 ~ . ! p 1 ~ ~r ~ ~
ti ;
~ ~ ~AA,, ~ ~ ~,y 1. . 4,;0. ~ II
Y } ~ 'ti 7 ~o } ~
~ _ a t ~ .
~ .
V ~ pr ~ ~
~y ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ rt ~
M ~ f i
I I f 1 - I - ~ ii ~
~ p _ _ - I
` I ~
r ~ , ~ [50
~ / i, -
- ~ ~ , s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~.o , I
1 I ,
J ~ , ~ ' ~ ,