Agenda 09/29/2016 sio1Z \1mm
Valle
Y
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Agenda
City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
September 29, 2016 6:00 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. COMMISSION REPORTS
VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
VII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda.
VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS:
i. Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update
IX. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
X. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: September 29, 2016
Item: Check all that apply: ❑Study Session ❑old business ❑ new business
❑X Public Hearing
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Draft Comprehensive Plan Update and Associated Development
Regulation Amendments
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act); chapter 43.21C
RCW(SEPA).
BACKGROUND: Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130(1), every 8 years every county and city in the state is
required to review and,if needed revise their comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure
the comprehensive plans and development regulations meet the current GMA requirements. The City of
Spokane Valley's update is due no later than June 30,2017.
Staff and the consultants have developed the Draft Comprehensive Plan Update, associated development
regulation amendments, and a draft EIS. On May 3, 2016, staff conducted a joint workshop with City
Council and the Planning Commission to provide direction to City staff and the consultant team on the
land use alternatives as well as goal and policy focus areas. On June 23, 2016, staff provided the results
from the joint workshop with the City Council and the Planning Commission. Staff received feedback
from City Council on the workshop results providing further direction on the development of the land use
alternatives and the goals and policies. On July 14, 2016, staff provided a presentation on residential
development in our region to offer context for the proposed residential development standards. On July
28, 2016, staff provided an overview of the draft land use map and the correlation to the existing
conditions report, with an emphasis on the focused analysis of Medium Density Residential,Mixed Use,
Office, and Neighborhood Commercial. On August 11, 2016, staff provided an overview of the
Comprehensive Plan draft goals and policies. On August 25, 2016, staff provided an overview of the
draft development regulations. On September 22, 2016, staff provided an overview of the draft
Comprehensive Plan and associated development regulation amendments.
Tonight, the Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing on the draft Comprehensive Plan and
associated development regulation amendments.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: The Planning Commission may recommend approval,
approval with modifications,or denial of the proposal.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger,Economic Development Coordinator
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Zoning Map
Please bring the yellow binder with the Staff Report,Draft Comprehensive Plan, SEPA analysis,and
associated development regulation amendments.
—`( ' - �� Antoine Peak
• Conservation Area
•
VI ,
.....
! �
Plant:s r
—�- CampSeka / errySp 1 4-- --
Conservation Stadiu ,�i ��
Area `i��/.___- t ® _ -----
Area
'.'. .qui:4' ,
--1--� �� E Euclid ��i:i1: J�
Ave mpire Way iyyy y� Mirabeau/T- '------ ��1
Millwood lnfaiaYea
' ( elts Field ��� ��
C —�I Y I I //%'%:/i" ,
�,: '� ► 111111L I ���/�®� '� �� Liberty
— ro�ri�" T►&_ 1 11 Lake
Spokan-
_._._....------I,-<',---'7.7-:- _.0.-7� I �I j — _ �� E Mission Ave
L Ji: ?
d—Broadway lista Dr
:,..i.• Infi II Area �` a
Dr
.151231 -
"T:— _-
_ 'Infill Area iinli
/7/41
N -_Carnahan 1 J1 j I j rr= ��� 2_ . (/^)
o J Infill- I ✓'alP,E U. �� J �A
~ Area-.
J'
.' Dishman Hills Ntu
. 7/ /011/.'/
Natural Area E 16 hAve / �/ , •a -se Uplaonds
AS A
City of Spokane Valley Zoning , \-72,.Mu p I B and s=ISE,La re Vs Ilek
f/JslrL ,evsll -J eanCro,m rearu a) IBJParks,Mot-Non,&opensp«eE 32n:..,w8Land Use Designation �, ,ZoningVi R1
r%
R3 /
POS /����'/
-MF //// i i
NC
fi, .
MU /, , . ,,,,I
i
CMU r/////Z/Vier
/ ®aPA�asen,ent Area-South Unit Morrow Pork
Natural 0 0.5 1 2 3
Yellowstone Plpellne
� Miles O
{ r/1
Legislative Update
Draft Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations Overview
Mike Basinger, Economic Development Coordinator
Spokane
Valley
Legislative Update
Discussion Topic Meeting
Joint Workshop May 3, 2016
Results of Joint Workshop June 23, 2016
Residential Development Standards Comparison July 14, 2016
Overview of Draft Land Use Map July 28, 2016
Policy Overview and Discussion August 11, 2016
Draft Regulations August 25, 2016
Spokane 2
Valley
Community Vision
■ Increased focus and access to parks and trails
■ Consider a specific focus area around new City Hall
■ Provide for a greater variety of housing types
■ Preserve the character of the neighborhoods
■ Locate housing near amenities like retail, health care, parks, and transit
■ Increase business opportunities and reduce barriers
Spokane 3
jValley°
Council Goals
■ Streamline land uses and maximize flexibility
■ Preserve established neighborhoods
■ Provide for a variety of housing types like tiny homes cottage houses
■ Change the mixed-use designations along Trent
■ Consolidate Office and Garden Office or change to Corridor Mixed Use
■ Expand and designate new areas of Neighborhood Commercial
Spokane 4
jValley°
im....... ...... .....iiini
Draft Comprehensive Plan Approach
.- 111MIV
• Economic Development focus .�•_
5pikane
f ..„,...valley
f
• Innovative and data driven
i
1
• Easy to navigate with an attractive design ,, 7 - ,
• Concise and understandable _
• Includes existing studies - m
• Retail Recruitment Spokane Valley
• Tourism Comprehensive Plan
2017-2037
• Existing conditions reports
Date Adopted
• Includes strategic actions
Spokane 5
Valley
Approach Continued
Economic Development
■
Specific section for goals and policies OALS
Support economic opportunities and employment growth for
Spokane Valley.
ED-G2 Create and cultivate a City brand that support economic growth
and leverages existing community.economic and natural asset.
•
ED-G3 priorities
h deael,gn.uent with sulrmluni Ly develepa,lerhl
Includes strategies in the goals andoriadieand fiscal sustainability
ED-G4 Collaborate with relevant economk development stakehocders.
including the business community,to grow a strong and healthy
regional economy
policies section ED-G5 Support and encourage the development of a strorgxorkforce that
Is globally competitive and responds to the Bunging needs of the
workplace.
EDGE Maintain a positive business climate that strives for flexibility;
predictability andstability.
POLICIES
ED-PI Work collaboratively with the private sector to support catalytic 7
development projects that are consistent with the City's vision. STRATEGIES
ED-P2 Identify and encourage business and employmentgrowth in new and 0 s u»dertatreaWm
innovativeindustries aed occupations bra-Ida...mess to ceateand
nark an tlenoay for Spokam
ED-Pt Encourage businesses that prcvidejabs and grow local markets. 0 Valley that sells McCMs
jinhere.assets M would-he
ED-P4 Promote key retail,office and industrial opportunity sites.as 0 res'darts.errhployersad
identified in the CibJs economic development studies and other i '"n1Of3
planning documents leg Certified Sites). Paninpatemeegonal rwn-
mrtaand
ED-PS Promote Spokane Valley as a great place to work,visit and do „oea erne eItys presence
business, ¢ .mai emu.
ED-P6 Promote the development redevelopment of vacant and % a Eva oao therenrm an
rmderutib properties particularlytcthose with potentialto wore as 0 I evsetrtod patfeavl tourer
ac economic 0 fudsacoade0nothefindngs
ED-P7 Implement strategies that are intended to create new attractions and
events that assert Spokane Valleys presence as a tourist destination. cc'YH7/7°W.44V/7/""7'7poo'YHJron
Spdkane 6
Valley"
.........m. ........ ......iiim
Approach Continued
• Includes an implementation
PRIMARY matrix identifying: STRATEGY ELEMENT RELATED ELEMENTS} PARTNERS TIMING PRIORITY
Undertake a comprehensive branding process to
create and market an identity for Spokane Valley • E.D.Division; 2017 HIGH
• Strategies that sells the City's inherent assets to would-be Economic •• •• Visit Spokane
residents,employers and visitors Development
• Primary Element Continue participation in regional tourism-pro- alE.eyl st,Vis
motion efforts and increasethe City's presence in Economic • • Spokane,Sports ongoing HIGH
regional events Development Commission
• Related Elements Evaluate the return on investment of potential •
tourism anchors and allocate availablefundsE.D.Division; 2018 HIGH
Economic •1 • •• Visit Spokane
according to the findings Development
• Lead & Partners •
Consider usingGlS and web-based technologies to
assist business development Economic • E.D.Division 2018 HIGH
Development
• Timing •
E.D.Division;
Intensifytargeted retail recruitment efforts Economic •••• Consultant 2019 MEDIUM
• Priority Development
Evaluate local interest in the creation of a Business • E.D.Division; 2019 MEDIUM
Improvement District Economic • • • Spokane County
Development
Sdkan e i 7
.Valley
Approach Cont. - Elements
■ Economic Development
■ Land Use
■ Housing
■ Transportation
■ Capital Facilities
■ Utilities
■ Parks, Recreation and Open Space
■ Natural Resources
Spokane 8
Valley
Approach Continued
Introduction
migit it. WHY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTELEMENT
/14 IS IMPORTANT
■ Elements a r e similarly organized ••
Economic develop rent creates living wagecip jobs,builds Valued community
amenities and generates additional municipal revenues that can he used to
maintain service levels,infrastructure and facilities.All other Comprehensive
Plan elements play a rote in attracting and retaining companies,increasing their
productivity,and growing the local and regional economy.In that sense,the
• Why the element is important Economic Development Element is integrative,and depends on effective land
use regulations,quality parks and recreationamenities,efficient transportation
infrastructure, reliable utilities and infrastructure, affordable housing
• Planning Context
opportunities,ec,comic d development
resource management,and responsible fiscal poli d
Put simply,eeorgnnie development is interbxined in all of the City's services and
rotes and is reliant on a dynamic and thoughtful approach to land use planning
• Current Conditions Proactive and innovative an erenomic development,induefforts are resomm erciale for
attraetlrg,recruiting and retaining office,industrial,and commercial and
residential uses within a city.This element is therefore focused on harnessing
market forces to encourage the implementation of Spokane Valley's vision.The
• Approach Economic Development Element therefore provides a comprehensive overview
of Spokane Valleys economy,sets policy direction.for economic growth,and
identifies strategies.programs and projectsto improve the economy.
1 PLANNING CONTEXT
— es and d 0 4 REFERENCES KEY
g Opportunities i' Economic development is one of the fundamental goals under the GMA As a
jRefers to other section• whole,the Economic Development Element attempts to merge the efforts of
%-)9( in plan the public and private sectors—the public sector has the ability to mold and
— Community and Economic Development Priorities f
Refers to other Spokane influence development but it is often the private sector that implements the
jCI Valley plans and official community vision through private investment Moreover,the GMA stipulates
ldocuments that the Economic Development Element promote economic opportunity
— for all citizens,particularly individuals who are unemployed or otherwise
Best Praetiees Refers other disadvantaged.Lastly,the GMA also prescribes a balance between economic
non-Spokane Valley growth and the efficient use of land and natural resources,which means
z references for further that economic development efforts must be based in sustainable planning
t• reading paradigms.
ka
Span 9
.Valley
im.......m... .......... ........1
Land Use Map
• Created one multifamily designation
o IIIIIIII■..... 111 �. 11;:77:1,'. � _ •-"- I f OM C
t i [■i� ■�i■■■■■■ ■ : - yr i- - E C- . !
1 .-■■■■ 1 r 11■: .1■ ...i 111 ■
inm - iIi■1iIiIi 111111111■■■■EI .I Neal U JI a dr- 111.x., ��r1
r I 010-00P1112 1 m 1 .11111111 ■ J.!! Uii
■• Wmjl:, •W. .r ■ ■■■■ E ■■1■■■■!!! M .i �m. 1ibd1t
5i ■.. IA� '� ��■Il�e�=� rlll■■ 11 . �1,� r
�forpriw� , '�/ 1 1Iliek,ilogriviww:
;211
RIM N.-
— L r. IM
I
gilreo
i, s r- , I -__�� SAS. ..-- rgelrar 1151r W 0
Mt -- 1
-- 11 A r , -/1/7/A rAllty 1. liii-1.271
I' � ALL} VA{, { � , �,
L; Jr ,F 71 /. 1 , L4i r f� -- J • ?A1.iiuJL!fII_1
.. -
,s'�ar++.�J�„,, ,,,„r�� f f r J / : J / / /�r f f i �� f J ''° -'�. .,+e..ss'a x�:.�n! e. r .r .� .
I` r - –• 1f= J if 7. ,j-`41 /7 ��,. 14 j ) . lied 151.5111 �4 '
/l_r1 �f
N
® _
AIIIIAILIII �I■ ■M II ■■! III. Iffirmilrilltlifillnumnism- 111■ -IIiii .1 E :�l=� .;'i I.
■ ma mo No 1111111■111111I �li11111 l ■ ■I1 ■� ligiii■■
.1■� �=, ■ i air■ ..=,=MM., .mi 1111111■■111111 f,11hI111. ■■■■I■ ■■■■■ nsli ■
S)(akan'�e� 10
_Valley
im......m... ••••••••••= iimiiim
Transit Service and Multifamily
l 1
- ±W______ I
zI I___________--_____--_______j_________.m i i i hi a 4 i zr„,____rn I • 1/2 mile buffer
A
IIII.
•
6
around bus stops
E Sprague Ave
27 ■ STA Redline 6
•
noir ....
w ■W.. 7 ■ minute service
Spokane Valley Public Transportation c
0) I c
I I Bus Stops 1/2 mile Buffer >
Bus Stops 1/2 mile Buffer I E I _
High Performance Transit Network U l) I (n
CO
—Red Line
Blue Line c
_ —Green Line
Bus Routes - �`_-
Municipal Boundaries j \
Q Spokane Valley \
®Spokane Valley Urban Growth Area(UGA)
Parks,Recreation&Open Space 0 0.1 0.2 1 0.4 0.6 0
Miles
`—"1 til /1 /
Sdkan e Footer 11
jValley°
---'""no
Land Use Map
• Designated new areas for parks and open space
• Land by Mirabeau
4_ -.11 figwort-
• Appleway Trail ROW .-low
414*
E1iI.i1 . .
MIN %,in._ ■` ■!1 1. gyp.. .. -- _eq I .. _ . ---.. -_ 1■1 -'' . -- - .'' .** '7‘ 4
■ ■ ■ J m==1[_11.•11•• .II ti i § 1.' ..■1IIIEE,2.1.Ic—!"r■r..z _. .." //://
/�
+^--•1•mw 11p-. i1h 11111� '�'4" � °I�,: _ /./ .teff -
Mtr � 1 11.1-E'2-'=--11— "'_40��P■■j■ i 7, // ..
E ak.
"�iiLS L.i ir1" t'+n`NJ'ri ■81 it s 4 ■Its��v l■11 a.:ii.. _■ %iPPAr x,
hi J r ' 1 I-E l iS3I�Wi�ry� it,l ji1! 1 r ,IllEr f
11 �'i�.r lmooar Clmifai w. S +'S�4. �':'� /a'`t'////!'='rfPll..
ram rr�ara4rar«..e,,..�:.s�.. �.;:r,:.:.w.,..�....- ...r.�..�lw,v..s..a a.,�--y v.=9s' � �.
r� , ` '�
� ;"' . 1111
f ',r
r Il15Aif 11 i I�I a�1 1I"•s!• SII i 1 I _ ■ JI■■= •... II 1111111. it 111 op 'f
III
sir ! g..� n .._ ... —.�
e`iIS151il5iy/ �•" ••i ■ . - IIIIIIILI■11■' 111 -
-- lm t
'IC-- • � , z,- =I= '1 �I II _•
- .. :till - I ..
r I zzavoi71AS,FA Kr;i AiLirow Emil . . 1 R .Imw ■ •m� a a11111i■■1■1■■11.11 J ES
a■■�I■■■■■ r�1111u■■11■1�.11111� 1 I I lap �.' .!!!P_1:!!1� 1■111■111nr I I , o ! __ � _
Sdkan'ems' 12
jValley°
..........m... ........ ...iiiiin
Land Use Map .- :
1 rill ilnini■ e
m1 1 Ieun /k' '
taa►fr1l u■n +soda .
IIII® = ice EIuiP 3
■ Changed Office corridors to Corridor Mixed Use ; ii
7� �� __
.". ri�iTl w
- 1■
• Multifamily, office, retail, and light manufacturing '"'911�_ = � = ■-=
='�IIIenq ■iii:"u'■I,_u
I y■ '1111 W►
----M -I .:------
111 n■EII0 ON WO-UM
=_. — — 'r ._ice 1IIILI �FI..Nil IlIIHi _%IIIIC�IL
.,11kaki,„...__
, I 1 III 'll:■ F 7_..
:HMI IIII r_.I_ E e
r. ■I.m p
Ml=r1 ME
� 111 �� '� �:
III , ►��, :r r '.-]:'.-'911L111■■ IIIil .. X1N Ile IIIIIIIIr■I
4.o-AV'" ' ' h ' '— 11111! I nl S PP Ii610=11111-�I
/s Arlt '+�f111 11■11 �/ ��� r�. `� rC El °�1D.� =w1210
1R1 v i 9a. r■Il1 r � % m
jinn III�.1 1■5„ .....
I / 49.411116111111 O nue■n �� �•i. ■11_1 --•2 zg se4.l t■`.
1 11i111� —- r! • .�
r .■. 0
i ' U■■IIf1■111=:11L: n1lnlln■ w -----1-,_p,�_' -. ■ 4"7 -bl kus=1■n
`fess I■■■■.5 ■11111111• ■mq �ixm�■ m=�■7� �" a Iil■1111I. '� 4 1dm
A. �11111111nIi." .II : Vera ■ .
nn■11111 LA11111111i1 11■■111111111■■■■w` 111 ■1 lrile111;:'Ante=IM"ns 'fir .,,�►N 'meg-EIlu ' ■F'!'s1 I ��.'.c
■I■■F' �o�ww w '�' 1"------'=------2- 1Z-2
r` 11 rre�I f
A ,i
I r.! 5 F IMIIII IIIIMM frl■■11■1u1n`■� .'.■■In1/111 IMNTRI Imo,=�.M11 ,� f ��. '471-Q
.DaltL � � w . 1■! C iwf r o -----�-� t r III r
or
rt Wail' 11nnn1n■1■nnnlll■n■■m:1,� • ■ Ia1 :: l 1i 1 •• ry ,��.10)- �i■�� •f
�' `� u11111U11111■■■Iu1WiNia1[11111J��■11c is 57,--,74.10).
�. �,s►
1IAium r C Em www ti !",i-a� 3'4 am ■■■A 11■111 i■11r:In��kW=Com' +vllr 0 OF'!.Q ■11 1■■111lwlllf■111■■■iiiii i11t1■Ir"4i!11�± sog r a,_ — _.
Spokane 13
.0,00 Valley'
im.......m... ........ .....iiimi
Land Use Map
• Designated new areas for neighborhood commercial development at
major intersections in close proximity to existing neighborhoods
rink
it - ---' „o '-;
*.--1-7. ;71091 at iii , .. ti,
, _._ ____ _ ,.._ .„ , . ,,
Sj 01Z @ J . _ aT, ,_ 4. ,
` 14
.00Vallem
Land Use Map
• Created Industrial Mixed-Use designation along Trent Avenue
• Allows for light industrial (contractors and tow yards)
• Continues to allow for commercial uses
-
_ is rr
- —f oi
/ r 1n IJ ,p 1,_u2_40
8 aad ue__� ■
a. X Jf �l
1 �
� ■
: ' H I— ig...fs _ i -Hti, g, .ii ?;,1
4 „
-
I. , L .h _.� -.. ,..�!_L �� r6 '. f —_ as Z`_ --� ■
2
1
= •, . I
.. NI ail Ave
� ,,
EHich A� = I llllllIl1F113t�� F��y�[`,it_,. MIN 1 1
itira
-- - f •_I
9 46._t.. 40,.. --,,- - �__— _ _ Lacrosse Ln
0,,,1;.;11 I
di E Industn-1 Park ASt
X11
Spokane 15
Valley
Land Use Ma p
• Consolidated the industrial designations
!•:I,c_ b,nn,..n.m ■ .r��4� -'�. . a■it'd
►.� :r _ ,,!//I,/ c. f
'I Illi lk- Irl, ll pl; Sri r.! ♦�1"" ""ni + . �t
i EE 9,111���� i. -NTr !. \ . :} rirrrt ii illi - r��-r / a lI
:II..i_=,, +Ihmllrli nor !! .uFel�l!!-■!nr n.x `. - r
i ii` 1�rllA �� '!1111 n! ul s �.u it ullikln! ■isr �A. ■ rte'
p� ■ p'uql ' alr_■� rrn• r.d_ dlH+l,Ir■ ZR. ` _PIP :I_ — - -
n":11; _l■fi llilr _el 1.11111• r -Biome JJ::f. J - — f.'�'. /i.
We gfere 4 Mgt
11111 PrWire-49:14
I_+�r. �IENIIP waRiTten
M ' Ili
dri
1 I/a P-11.11/
1 err/✓ ; .
IMMINIO11011 innaosotta0=,,o`,*11. -0
- V 11111E'llniiwiallio-f*-1-41i1
1,,, (
{ k �,.,.rr,,,k h1,.lil
�fr t _ ___ __ 4,2� . .hrJ'1p lll1p0
ri
-orall"MI allimm- 1111*,_ „riga
�i r� �.1 �111 � szA�ttSttit►�
- Irl►. "Iii ...
.._, ,.....
A i. ! e,a'' Jran nn r
r 'rriliiiillir--= :."'`°fig — or'-'426- II
rf 1■r,.:�nru..r 1.1 mpg_room 1 MI tir,rr:cir.rW
_ J =ui�5=1t■111 + � � . ! .,�
'� xrr�! /d°;+: or',..,-,r'!r lit s ■ m ®sit■■ ,:34 r +r -
Spakane 16
Valley
m•••••••mm. ........ ....iiiiimi
Land Use Map
• Integrated Community Commercial into Corridor Mixed Use and Regional Commercial
A__ Id -r---Li- ,ILLI1JilliEgliartiffia!
In �... _ i Zliditifii,ii, — 1 O
SVp AI '
, ? iii0/1?" - . ..
r i
1 1
I • .,47:ii.d..4 Ord
z
•
, Ail ono
� -- �� r a 'ay— r —I
� ME ! _ — gT, rlj:jifl(t
111 5 s 1 ,
. 1 .- T-'' . rig - 'Fianna I — 1• i i )21104 _ ���
+1 — fJ ? T.
, Ar 0' . ' 7 *://,>1.///:,7 ',..'e,'
- 2immimwm.1%0 - „‘,....4 Sr . 1
91wl.■ = ,. +,C ,,'14' -"'
rtroM - . • , /./ .....,. ,. ,
HeFA J� � � y I. / r r /// 14. 0 ri
�7 r. v
roitig
j� 1 + J� / l l _ - vii. .I!_.
�T p _ _� _r v _ i - ./// 177
r f h , , I _I ° � IA � ` ` ..„ _ __
g I -1 1 i ! ^
r. �..� .. r '3"/i CIS -
Sdkan e 17
Valley
Land Use Map z) -- --,
.___,
, _
,____1
____-- , ______
, , .,. _
ate. s__ .
■ New housingr
BOP
opportunities .
r4 _
gill
• North/south corridors y, tril :, ..71-rr- v1::- i�" lir-
-::::-
• Consolidated R3 & R4
:43 iiiiiiiiim'6-
• Consolidated MF zones jig • 11111•771.611.6-1 WWII Mall
~'' -4, '''�I i
1
• New mixed-use area
r di
cS
Housing Designations Community Prosperity
EDfty puisne vea,2016 Comprehensive Pla n Designations
SiIwerereoey -War Roads =
ani S
r {
Spokane 18
.100Valley-
LandUseMap
•
Spokane Valley Mining -
■ Created language in `
development regulations
F
to allow existing mining 3 :. ._._
r :. . 3 .--'rare: d ,.
operations to mine •
v
, c i .-
3 ;r- 3
within their permitted Y
rights 2 , ,_„.
.,
i
il
j • _j
til
4b
i
Spokane 19
Valley
'........m...7 .......7...IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Community Prosperity
Proposed Map (9 Designations, 11 zones) Existing Map (12 Designations, 17 zones)
w
h
ml
I —...ill moi`°% � ilim
AIMMamen1=.11
4 M �. Fiir
1 � a €j :
I 4... spioN MP S �Er— rg x - . o- 1 Millslimilli
v
MI" —111;—:_ — �mrr�im:a�iin ��1; _ 1� �_ 1l 70 \ r
VI `��I
aEl�\
dm At
I_wilralillm !MINI i rl
I _ ,
is
l: i
.
aoaerooAIOO.a� !a '
Community Prosperity Alternative --- �n -
jrcof Sp,ane VAy Mixed use J , ieotl,
watnobody I=negnmhood CommancA o -rr.areo,�.mu�m.Ra �.
Future Lane use Map 2.017 =, pna commem. .� , �,� a
deg 1.NIA -a usma M=eeuse �,. ='.....^.."
m.a�l...m^�
e aaea'. m
1=Multi nom 6Y .1 ..
Ineusbai .wu:.:n a.ama -rt.,r�w.rn
comd0MuedUep -F eks ane Open Space _ um.^m"'°'m'ae2W _re0000 ,
Spokane 20
Walleye
Development Regulations Revisions
■ Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
■ Compliancy with current laws
■ Streamline regulations
Spokane 21
Valley
Implementing Regulations
■ Title 17 General Provisions
■ Title 19 Zoning Regulations
■ Title 21 Environmental Controls
■ Title 22 Design and Development Standards
■ Appendix A Definitions
Spokane 22
Valley
Title 17 General Provisions
■ Develop a stronger interpretation process
■ Remove rebuttal period
■ Modify sign requirements for Public Hearing Notice
■ Hearing Examiner change of conditions
■ Added vesting provisions
Spokane 23
Valley
Title 19 Zoning Regulations
■ Reorganized Title
■ Modified zoning district to be consistent with the new land use map
■ Modified permitted used matrix to reflect new zoning districts
■ Incorporated language for small dwellings (tiny homes and cottages)
■ Modified Density and Dimensional standards
■ Created Transitional Standards
■ Modified Administrative Exceptions
Spokane 24
Valley
Zoning Districts
• Created implementing zoning districts consistent with Comp Plan
• R-1 preserves existing development patterns
• R-2 preserves existing development patterns
• R-3 promotes reinvestment in existing neighborhoods
• MFR allows for multi-family housing near business and transit
• MU allows for office, retail, & multi-family
• CMU allows for light manufacturing, retail, multi-family and office
• NC allows for small-scale retail and offices uses
• RC allows retail, wholesale, and service
• I allows for manufacturing, processing, assembly, and freight handling
• IMU allows for retail, office, light industrial uses (contractors yards)
SOkane 25
.Va11ey
Alternative Residential Development
■ Provides options to traditional single-family development
• Identifies where alternative housing types can be developed
• Identifies the permit type
• Provides development standards for:
— Accessory dwellings units — Manufactured homes
— Industrial accessory dwelling units — Small residential dwellings
— Cottage developments — Townhouses
— Duplexes
Spokane 26
Valley
Permitted Uses
■ Modified permitted uses to reflect zoning classifications
• Added - Industrial Mixed Use
• Removed - Single-Family Residential Urban district (R-4), Medium Density
Residential, Office, Garden Office, Community Commercial, and Light Industrial
■ Consolidated retail sales and service uses into one broad use category
■ Consolidated medical uses into one broad use category
■ Created a Marijuana broad use category
Spokane 27
Valley
Supplemental Uses
■ Created a new section for supplemental uses
■ Removed supplemental uses from district descriptions
■ Related supplemental uses to broad use categories
■ Created a section for uncategorized uses such as Home Businesses
Spokane 28
Valley
Density and Dimensions
■ Adjusted standards in R-3
• Min lot size 5,000 sq. ft.
• Eliminated min lot width and length
• Retained density (6 units/acre)
■ Adjusted standards in MFR
• Eliminated density
• Eliminated building height
■ Eliminated non-residential dimensions except for NC
Spokane 29
jValley°
im.......m... •••••••••• =iiiiiiiiiiiii
Transitional Provisions
• Reduces impacts on adjacent uses
Si
i ' 1 ■ Ground level setback 10'
PI v/
81 • Landscaped per 22.70.070
�1o
�� 45'
Limited uses allowed
` .� •
� 1 tig\c335
�› ■ Upper level is a 1 to 1 ratio
§.. 25'
LI
15' starting at a height of 15' at the
property line of the protected
Protected Zones 1 Zones Providing Protection
setback zones.
Spakane 30
Valley'
Title 21 Environmental Controls
■ Created a SEPA infill exemption to promote development
■ Consistency with the Shoreline Master Plan Critical Areas
regulations
■ Updated methods and references to reflect best available
science
Spokane 31
Valley
Title 22 Design and Development Standards
■ SVMC 22.50 Off-street Parking and Loading Standards
■ SVMC 22.70 Fencing, Screening & Landscaping
■ SVMC 22. 110 Sign Regulations
■ SVMC 22. 130.040 Street Standards
■ Re-organize and streamline language
st,tlley 32
Title 22 Design and Development Standards
■ Modified off-street loading space requirements
■ Clarified clearview requirements
■ Streamlined buffering and screening requirements
■ Modified landscaping requirements
■ Modified surety requirements
st,attiley 33
Appendix A Definitions
■ Removed unnecessary definitions
■ Strengthened Use Category definitions
Spokane 34
Valley
Schedule
Meeting Planning Commission City Council
Study Session September 22, 2016
Public Hearing September 29, 2016
Public Hearing (Extended) October 6, 2016
Deliberation and recommendation to City Council October 13, 2016
Administrative Report October 25, 2016
1st Reading (Public Hearing) November 8, 2016
2nd Reading November 22, 2016
Spokane 35
Valley
Questions
Spokane 36
Valley