1997, 10-15 CUP-22-95 Applicationr '��i / '. fc7�i✓I "�' ct-n � rr�udsrs�. ea "
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR
Name of Applicant: Ct'LK % f f e S feye vso v Agent: Y
Street Address: /;3 (/r rr Lf,X Oy c -
Zip Phone - Home:
City: I ft- N e State: a/Yl- Code:'c', fly Work:
ellrr j Agent's No.:
Name of Property Owner(s): 4.4gw-o-Z
Street Address: / 3 / T y — AV t
/ Zip Phone - Home: Roomy
City: 10 k14_1v n State: �(� Code: �i�r 6 Work: _
REQUESTED ACTION(S) (Circle appropriate action):
Variance(s) Conditional Ur�mu Expansion of a
Other-'. Nonconforming Use
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Violation/
;Section �� Township ._ Rang Enforcement: N
-Fire District: It •CWWP sewer purveyor:-Sa2KU,�6b r
•CWSP water purveyor: e) U em'O- -CUP standards met: Y N 40
-Existing zone: �4 K - 3, � 'Cite applicable section: 1 & ll b ,
-Comp. Plan designation: UW -Arterial Road Plan designation:"iC
'Critical Areas: Wetlands` ; Habitat--; Geologic_; Aquifer=; and/or Flooding "`
-Lot, legal & add'1 ownership checked by: E4_4 -Person doing preapp conf.: 'z5w
-Other/previous Division of Planning actions involving this property:_
SEPA complete application date • 4
•Certificate of Exemption No.: _ p Application No.:
Hearing Date: (,�C4- . /qq S -variance site plan dimensions checked by;.
ABOUT THE PROPERTY (by applicant)
-Existing use of property: % f ; of
-Describe proposed use of the property, noting change from'existing use': '
-If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance sought in comparable
terms (i.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet):
•If a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards? Y N
If not, has one or more variances been requested? Y N
-If HOME INDUSTRY, has consultation occurred with Division of Buildings regarding
construction of building for intended use? Y N
-What is the size of the subject property. ,A o -( ; s q9. ! f "x' /1-/9 r 6ilr, b�
-Street address of property (if known): 13 &/ Sr e v* Ate) c.
-Legal description of property (include easement, if applicable):
-Parcel No(s).:
-Source of legal: R -z( z s !,,, 4 C -F- w u s I A --f P /PLC .
-Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, sponsor and/or agent: A) O.lyc
•What interest do you (applicant) hold in the property? ro cvrV P je
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE
PROD' AEA Sl 1%; <{2) IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM OWNER AUTHORIZNG MY ACTIONS ON
FUSMER BERA1,F IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
`AER MADE T! M I LnU'L LY AND TO THE BEST OF MY•KNOW EI E
1Votary Yubl�i*c m and Tor the state of Washington, residing at
_ -� 22- 64_7 r__( . My appointment expires: /0 —1 S`-19 9 7
HD(Z.A APP kUn- '. 4155) page 1 of 2
4 l a
lk,
A. BURDEN OF PROOF form(s) (by applicant)
It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative, to establish the reasons why the
REQUESTED ACTION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in favor
of approving the application. Accordingly, you should have been given a form for your requested
action (variance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way which
addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return
it with your application.
B. SIGN -OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS AND OTHER AGENCIES
(applicant must visit each agency whose no. is circled below)
0 SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
a) Proposed method of water supply: - Ue.r c,
b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: -Se- e_� �--- x
A preliminary co su] aa;; on has een held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of requiremeritsz�l✓a��arae request consultation with Division of Planning Y
(Signature) (Date) (Sign -off Waived by Planning)
TOR
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDINGS
HOME INDUSTRY ONLY: A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the
proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards for the building, based
upon the proposed use.
(S
(Sign -off Waived by Planning)
3. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS
t� preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of rtruements.and-standards. We request consultation with Division of Planning. Y N
g --So
(Date) (Sign -off Waived)
4�POKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (Division of Planning may waive
if outside WWMA)
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed
of requirements and standards.
(Date) (Sign -off Waived by Planning)
[ ] The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with
to become informed of water system
requirements and standards. (See #a below)
[ ] The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with U1'/ --17-i S
/2 � to become informed of sewage disposal
requirements and standards. (See #b below)
a . WATER PURVEYOR: VE.�
The proposal jaijais not located within the boundary of our future service area.
2) pos The z i n located within the boundary of our current district.
3) Weare not able to serve thi site with adequate water.
4)}tzsfactor , rangeme a not been m c to ve this proposal: r
(Signature) V(Date)
SEWERAGE PURVEYOR: fK �F'7 To �X/sTirlld��'
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been
informed of requirm n and dards.
(Signature) -'' (Date)
page 2 of 2
HD/ZA APP (REV. 4/95)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FORM
Name:
File:
V. CONpMONAL USES State Law, Section 36.70.020 (7), clarifies that the County
regulations must specify the standards and criteria that shall be
applied in the review by the Zoning Adjustor. Additionally,
condition of approval may be added to assure compatibility with
other uses in the same zone.
A. Assuming the proposal is listed as a "permitted" conditional use, do you believe the
proposal meets all of the required, established and applicable standards?
B . if you cannot meet the conditional uses required standards, are y.Qu seeking relief by
applying for an administrative exception or a Variance? Yes No (Circle One)
C. What have you done or could you do to:
1. Make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity or
a? ��
13
CC
2. Ensure agains1t_impos`i_ng e cessive demands upon public utilities?
Explain how or why the proposal will not be detrimental to:
E. What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent
(health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Code A�p mitigate any adverse
effect upon the neighboring properties - - including but not limited to: 1) time limits; 2)
front, side or rear yard greater than minimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing;
5)/off-street parking, and 6) others?
CUP; BURDEN OF PROOF FORM
REV; 11'91
r,
W
I
i'
\�
r--
•
Q�
-
et
✓Y'
ill
1
r 1
3d
i