1985, 09-05 Permit: 00007263 DemolitionSI▪ G▪ NATURE OF
OWNER OR AGENT
4510E 7TH AV
BREEDEN, JOHN ET AL
4510 E 7TH AV
z•.
SPOKANE ••.WA 99206
KREMSREITER, JOE
Building Code Fee $1.50
..0a..0......
235324402
0999
OD2543
0. > .LOC"
0 044 002
.....
232543
000
000
`000
000
004
23 DEMOLITION
451(7"'E 7TH AV
Building Code Fee
DEMOLITION
Sq -Ft: 1000
DEMOLITION PER
APPLICATION
DATE
'
0007912
0•••:
09/05/119
•�
nnnn77iC
DEMOI TTION S20 an fl
Building Code Fee $1.50
o
. .
".
co.".E"..7/// h50
..."......
IT
TOTAL FEE
TOTAL. FEE
Fee
$1.50
$2_0.00
20.00
0'9 05,,85' 47L0= *211
t
0
0
W
0
O
4
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TO:
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
C 0 0 N T
WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR
ALL PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL
e
Assis • -tor
DATE: December 27, 1993
SUBJECT: TO CERTAIN
LESSER USED WITH
DSEPA EPARTMENT RESPECT
ES AND PERMITS
It has come to my attention that, in some instances, such permits as Determination of
Nonconforming Status and certain other administrative determinations may be subject to the
Environinental Policy Act. It is difficult to generalize, as each case may have a different set of
circumstances. A general guideline would be that if, as a result of granting the written
nonconforming status request or another written administrative determination, a project will
materialize and that project has never before been subject to SEPA review for the exact type of
process or situation which will result, more than likely that decision should be subject to SEPA, an
environmental checklist should be filled out and evaluated, and a threshold determination issued.
Of course, we may have authority to apply a minor construction or other exemption. When in
doubt, consult with Tom Mosher.
An example is the recent request for nonconforming status for a grain storage bin converted to an
agriculture storage structure. If a Change of Use Permit or a Certificate of Occupancy had been
issued at the time the change occurred, it clearly should have been subject to SEPA in the Building
Department. On the other hand, if it is determined that no Change of Use Permit or Certificate of
Occupancy was needed to establish a change of use in 1988 or 1989 from a grain storage bin to an
agricultural fertilizer storage building and a request for nonconforming status is only recently
submitted after a complaint (as in a recent case), then the nonconforming status request itself
should likely have been subjected by the Planning Department to review under SEPA. These
procedures are now beingcurrently reviewed before the Board of Adjustment and in the Building
Department and we will have a firmer outline of this kind of procedure sometime in the near future.
Pll keep you posted.
c Mark Holman, Department of Buildings
Rob Binger, Deputy Civil Prosecuting Attorney
WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 • (509) 456-2205