Loading...
1984, 08-31 Permit App: 00002072 MH BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION WORKSHEET PLEASE PRINT AND COMPLETE ONLY THOSE PARTS OF THE FORM YOU UNDERSTAND (Please return this original and your building plans to the Department of Building and Safety) t 1 Owner's Name /j�� (last) (/first)// (m) Department Use Only Y/! 7--- 5 —Y �reZr/// .. Fbs. Comm 2 Project Address(not Mailing Address)or Road Name Space Zip ago --`_ff / r � Ca A �C_ .,G) rg 3 City/Community State & 1PlatN me ,,� - ' �� r Parcel o. Lot Block ..- - Z - z c 4 f — 907 07 I (e 0�1 * * * DEPARTMENT USE ONLY * * * 5 Sic Code Zone Act.M Zone /� Project No. -2-�7 SM ) -7 6 Dwell# No.of Buildings Sq.Ft./Acre L,,1 c- .rritfriDepth ( + Frontage I t 4 1 - /�,Ilf�v 600 57)0 7 Set Back-Frontt I(L)S-1 (R)S-22 I Rear- Census Tract Module No. Initials 25 * 16 Architect Firm Name Street Address Zip City State Phone ( ) Contact Person Phone if different than above ( ) Contractor Firm Name Street Address Zip City I State Phone ( ) Contact Person License No. Phone if different than above ( ) 8 Owner/Agent(if different than#1 above) Business Address 9 Zip City State Phone ( ) 12 Review Required Plan Check(Y/N) Other(Y/N) SEPA Exempt(YIN) Date / 15 Type Work ❑ Bldg MH A New ❑ Replace ❑ Other D Fire ❑ Demo ❑' Add/Alter ❑ Move 14 Describe Work( �/ /I/7` �S�✓ fG'i S`1 e--‹41 ��L vi 10 Applicant Name / Street Address L s J/ / � 5 11 Zip City State r Phone _ Lender Street Address Zip City State Phone ( ) Contact Person Phone if different than above ( ) Additional Information - E-1-1ST1 t Q1 I P 9 C, O `•?— cr1 r 1W E7711'11 rEW4,e)9f.y ppkir - cLL-20-2/ DEPARTMENT APPROVALS This is nota Permit Application Type • (Standard unless (Indicated approvals required in either"release"or"release with conditions" otherwise indicated) space prior to permit issuance.) ❑ Fast Track ❑ Early Start Release Release w/cond 1 Hold 2 Environmental Health ❑ Commercial; ❑ Residential co/4 W. 1101 College LCY New Construction; E Bldg alteration/addition Pelt �Q Room 200 ❑ Additional structure;trS APPLI ATION# Q e/ ,V.--7 Conditions/Comments: 7 i / (' E 1) M/ Planning/Zoning: El Commercial; El Cert.of Exemption; ❑ Frontage; "OA 1-2-8?/ N.721 Jefferson ❑. Setbacks; El lot w/d; El lot size; ❑ use/zone; G G/U,variance,zone change;shoreline; El fence; El Other / , 0 Conditions/Comments: in�E �:7� a¢+.6. Tif Engineers: CI Commercial; ❑ Residential; ❑ Flood Plain; i �r z' ' I . N.811 Jefferson ❑ drainage ❑ new access/approach; ❑ fence; ❑ ro.• impr+vements05)-�-i Conditions/Comm- ts: G1-- ALA A 2' wi/ /'- I./ "'-GL' 44r. i CI Utilities: Utilities: N.811 Jefferson Conditions/Comments: Other: � .L/-- 4.?/e- ,-. -V-/ 1.5. :-3",..7/3"ty 1 ❑ Plan Exam Fire Prey. Conditions/Comments: a c � ❑ Project Representative Telephone a Agencies Performing Special Inspection: co . O c 1. O as i; It E 2. rn O co c u 3. 1 Indicate above or attach conditions relative to final as built approval 2 Indicate above or attach reasons for hold 0 \ k �i Spokane County .-``x department of building & safety Irm04101. .,* fo 0ii tib} Meir ;1111:11E,:,` JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR December 11 , 1984 Mr . and Mrs . Al Crisp South 3821 Schafer Road Spokane, Washington 99206 Dear Mr . and Mrs . Crisp : . This letter is in response to your letter of November 30 , 1984 requesting the results of our investigation into the issuance of a building permit for the mobile home as a residence for a dependant relative located on your property , Spokane County parcel number 32545-9071 . As a result of our investigation , it was found that no errors were committed by Spokane County nor was there any incorrect information supplied in the application for the building permit . In the issuance of the permit for the mobile home, the following findings are hereby presented : 1 . That a Conditional Use Permit (#CUE-20-84 ) was issued by the Spokane County Planning Department on May 14 , 1984 to allow a mobile home as a residence for a dependant relative . 2 . That a public hearing was held before the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor on May 9 , 1984 . 3 . That a due notification was given to all property owners within 300 feet of the applicant ' s ownership . 4 . That it has been found that the text of the legal notice did contain accurate information to properly inform the public of the purpose and intent of the hearing . A determination rendered by legal counsel for Spokane County , James P . Emacio, on October 24 , 1984 , found that the legal requirements for public notice were met . In particular , it was found that the notice did contain : a . Time and place of public hearing . b . A statement to the effect that a " legal descriptions and project details for these projects are available in the Planning Department files " . NORTH 811 JEFFERSON • SPOKANE,WASHINGTON 99260•0050 • TELEPHONE(509)456-3675 060 ‘Ii100 Mr . and Mrs . Al Crisp December 11 , 1984 Page 2 of 3 c . The name of the Applicant , "Al Crisp " . d . Notification that the temporary manu- factured home for the dependent relative to be located on the Crisp property would be west of Mr . Crisp ' s existing residence . e . A map outlining in black the location of the Crisp property . 5 . That an application for a building permit for the mobile home was made on August 2 , 1984 . A plot plan was submitted showing the proposed location of the mobile home to be west of the Crisp ' s residence and approximately 25 feet from the old Schafer Road . 6 . Spokane County Planning Department signed the permit release on August 2 , 1984 noting that the mobile home "must meet all setbacks " . 7 . That on August 27 , 1984 a Quick Claim Deed was issued by the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners for a portion of the Old Schafer Road to Allen D . Crisp and Lorrie B . Crisp . The granting of the right -of-way was in accordance with the provisions of Resolution 78-613 in the matter of vacation of Old Schaefer Road . 8 . That the Spokane County Engineer ' s office signed the permit release on August 6 , 1984 noting that "okay for mobile home to be placed on County ' s parcel for sale if purchased " . 9 . That a revised plot plan was submitted showing the new location of the proposed mobile home prior to the release of the building permit on August 31 , 1984 . 10 . That the Conditions of Approval stated in CUE-20-84 did not include a provision that substantial conformance to the plot plan submitted is required . The only reference made to the location reads "the placement of the manufactured home shall be in compliance with all plat dedications " . In this case , the property is not located within a plat and there are no dedications . 11 . That on August 31 , 1984, building permit number 2072 was issued for the mobile home to be located on that portion of Old Schafer Road deeded to the Crisps . Mr . and Mrs . Al Crisp December 11 , 1984 Page 3 of 3 12 . That a final inspection was made and approved by this department ' s building inspector on October 3 , 1984 . 13 . That from on-site review by this department as part of its investigation on Code compliance, it was found that the present location of the mobile home is approximately thirty (30 ) feet from the west property line . The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance , Section 4 . 04 . 150 (a ) (2 ) requires that a side yard setback shall be a minimum of five (5 ) feet . The basic concern which resulted in our investigation was due to the belief that the covenants of the Ponderosa Subdivision as well as the Single Family Zone classificaiton prohibited mobile homes . While this is true , the location of Old Schafer Road , as well as your property , is located outside of the boundary line of both the subdivision and the zone classification . Also there was a concern regarding the accuracy of the legal notice which had been addressed above . The matter of our investigation has been concluded with the results as noted herein reported to County Officials . On behalf of this office and myself , I want to express my appreciation for the cooperation and understanding you extended during the course of our investigation . If we can be of further service to you , please feel free to call . Best holiday wishes , DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Thomas L . Davis Zoning Investigator TLD : PJK -4z tg ' t -4. A , .,-.. . , . c../ e -77-- .-- ,--" ..- / . -- el ---- 1--- 1•- Ni //' e ' k A\ te j 7\ \\\\ o i. Nvz:N15: • )-- \\"( 4. , , s 0 iiNN N4 ly ..3 /4- I. = _I( stl". COu'a •,. / wp ci • 4 ....4 ‹,.... <> 40 cr‘4tC / 40, ..Po ..k.-/- / • // 1/ i /‘\ ., NNN ..-- 1,, 110 ,• /\, ,\ • 's, t 0 • ,k 'V <:" \\ \• .'! N ) Nk 07 CT • 4t/etj•124('•04- „... 0,, a / ccui. /7( „ -,,_. ,. // il";/, , zzz..” ,.... .,_ t. 3, - „. , „.. , - , f , ,,, ,,:e -t. E ...)'p0-247 s.....,44 A- a 5144, ,............. . _ IIroWl COI T ,C 1 1tt COM) i TYPE 1 COMMENTS • yN\ I, , , -E( c — --7-J—f' P — inv zc<< ce,i c.-9.• c----(-- '4 ....(4"-----fr ,. (.... . C..4- .2 _.[ �r.sem / <--.-• /l f Ctt'i1 7 1 1 ! A. 1 • L . • ,I . f .tin .•._• 1.,r,'.,•,,'.••,.' 'x'�I.. coil i A\C I ItFCUUI) -- IS I • TYPE COr•II.ICNT5 v _ ''IrAIMA -# taileinir 11111W/ r _l I. ra. t !I 46.• -.s.*.,I w - - 1 -40M1.11-11.1111111111111WAIMPLeh' /i! w t . ,11111.1111111.111111" ..........imiiii 1E • -porir -. . ,1kiii.moor'foolamorgoirmir _` r r1MINEI ■ - la A l1 ° w K, I l J1 i ICOI rACt III Cott!) . E TYPE CUt•ttdCNTS ,i_ -I- (8_4 f taw,e. . I., .1.- ,ti-, -.,�c cy c-,,,e - A. ,, -c>c tM Gin Vy}Aw 17 l^ Pi r d U lre-L YVl 1 Yl.C4 r 41. .1- I vel'1 J ill - ' i k 6i.4..-e,..0 (rt. -iv--)"3 12C, .: t c a,S ILI( �C'V>rms.)M1PCYC - , 'OG fr' /� GGA� PMrr f �� c=• G'V'i- c 1- id r'roY1 utr LA 1 IA(Al h►i.)e , €4/ ,yam>,. ., 'fry, h, re I''I 0-e''I c�4i CAA '. r (` -1x__fr., •C �re fc'r1�-e v tlt0 t .�ikr< lir t 5 '. i etin V+ o r'rcr i ,n ♦ d ti it rt6 'VY114 i 1l g-rINA,1_ �On uon / / V .t his - / 1.4r-e 4 /111,44-17? ill i • .( sp'n `, . . fir 1, "4- „_,/-Z, C -5 ilc' /YYI/Di29l1,1(ib'rl4 G141.r.1/4.1-- teL re 1.;,c- -- 4-1-7 t,_;./..”. 1,:.t 4 071,e-2 LA-c-„," lee e L��_ ,G?6, I (,;fro . rZlt.) t)-wv\.44._-- C. 4,./1 (..J.D(.11, . I?Prvnn f - (I) 7In 1pr er[ . 9-1, 'f`'"^ `L i /«'l /JL4// r.0. ,%moi/ ///-K'��L%"�L !!!"___ ., L i tr-t_ L01,1ILiI1 CO • _ R_. [`v+.e s eex t1 •r • 'i._ r1r 1,., C.{:101 0 UJ'Y�v A 1t •.50 62,....r,tq ) d„../ It,/ t�Z 1,t y 1` Y /0-.30- Li/. ri...(0...• 7 — p _ !� e• i. --- — (� , f, e a-. c /c, �..�/ 1 C favi .../ ce.4atw.� ...a.r,>ti /04 e c • .. 1 Oa_ 4-,..,_1,&.i .1�)C.7�v>>%�Yi 5 . Wo a IC.Q pie �(Lot 1 in c Y10� =� .2re pe�, /�c.) /O-3o-l`/ C`t u rte a'Ftw. w ; Le. Ahv` C3c,.sc.. 41-12._ ANZ or C t k : rL•err Cot 1n.. h �, t :s I7 w�_ 1\A-n.,_ /� w : I, 1 re# . .4_., loc v (, , •'fir A J, ( . l 17 Q(�. tyl.sa VVI t:/1 ,4,n ,L 1/ /IAS* 4 t Co(( LI 7(..4. t t. a t Ol t�i.fK . /D- r - iqlr�� ti . t miskomomr .. o , r ; immw .tet ~MM.I ..a. - 4141t (. A i. r •. . ♦ ir O Ga ( /t _ tt C- 't ,, i• • _ U t exp 4 4a_4,2 k ------ ---------JA,..;A., ..P .,,,...", _________. . cled 9.7/ "taAt...4._-______4- /e.27 / yNe4c,is A-(' . W to no ecQ \A u u►t. 4 e... em - u. , . 1 /a-j/-,544 — ti / Jam`/� 7)l . �; ._, 7 t:14 01--c-_ l 4 : 1 , j/G X 0 c, c� yi., C,,c -vim / - /�i._7 /6 - ° s;ti, - - -&,-. cin _lam L-CJ1 p e c.:c-., /�C� 9 ____ 1 i / ' 9 -- �fi�_` -4/7.i L, t.n2- _„ c_ , -e.e---- 4,Z' e}-c2„.. �'�Y!/I I T / L.�1.J e ,L.Lys .41, 7/ .e C.e (1/5 //-7/6. ..iCOI r r AC I rtt C'UIW r TYNE CUr•Ir•IEUT5 , o- r, NUM . I .. ..IIIIMIIIIIIIIIVIENIIIIPIRMIIIIIrMrjll _ . _ ._' - -SY ■ f. 9 ..... A . 4-. . ..8 r -I .. - I l" . ,t. . . . : N . I Id -- IIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIMIII • _ ... s - :. - * � �. mimicry mom j ■� .* WI '.. , ` . . I - _ . ii • .r1 i i • - . i. . . __ Ir _ �Tr . r , 0 0 .► 1 MINK 1 • UMW - . - -- mpswwtinrroJuumpwPPRIN7r- RI_ AM. PIA. ` ,. . a'_ ...► , w. ,s-- - 7 :. u0 . ., .W�''l�/ / o.r:r rw.A..a..A • lGSee �, t1.. D t p. ; /viia.( (4,c.. .6 ea r1�tvr0''pta: if' . • • DEPARTMENT APPROVALS This is not a Permit Application Type (Standard unless (Indicated approvals required in either "release"or "release with conditions" otherwise Indicated) space prior to permit issuance.) 1.___ l ❑ Fast Track ❑ Early Start Release ! Release w/cond 1 i Hold 2 Environmental Health I) Commercial; ❑ Residential to/4 W. 1101 College New Construction; ❑ Bldg alteration/addition Ps�r/o 1 Room 200 ❑ Additional structure; a}' APPLICATION tr # O (/-- , J Conditions/Comments: -fi7,- ,-/-12--‘f71;00_Y- • 7 )S Planning/Zoning: ❑ Commercial; ❑ Cert.of Exemption; ❑ Frontage; 41-2-8.4/ N.721 Jefferson ❑��GE//6U, ❑ lot w/d; ❑ lot size; DIuse/zone; fil/CU,variance,zone change;shoreline; ❑ fence; ❑ Other ./ Conditions/Comments:Ini eE `! �+-� ► Engineers: ❑ Commercial; ❑ Residential; ❑ Rood Plain; N.811 Jefferson ❑ drainage ❑ new access/approach; ❑ fence; ❑ ro impr vements /� �'d Conditions/Comm ts: is�i c L' 2�LL2-, .cot/,e,--e - �!� _ ti5� G a6c�� - $ El Utilities: N.811 Jefferson Conditions/Comments: dr Other: /I7 //-Z) >f�1./.ZC�/ 1 .1 1 � El1 Plan Exam Fire Prey. Conditions/Comments: Ill 1 Project Representative Telephone !I i. Agencies Performing Special Inspection: • 0 1 i ni E 2. o HE 3. 1 Indicate above or attach conditions relative to final as built approval 2 Indicate above or attach reasons for hold ,47 -0' 7;4', ., , k / f <;'' 7/ \ \ , ,:k.s: 41 Rte} , irCr PS\ 0;2, , - 4,E. SPKOPO�ag.D �� *` • tgc- .bP&RTY ..15F-,--:: / • .41- i .011:401. e--/,,,‘, \ 'a3BL1 ":1,:00,„/;:it. . / ' viii ..' <j' //j , 00- 7470 �, 114 Ft I. Ft??. P-16 PC ,Y h\ \ ' �' 4. 4' Mob.La-.u_�M /} • i� � \ 4 .� -OcATiojE � / � 11111111 ' ?atIPOISO N .y,) +i ‘' i. on, teCP-7OF ro.ott PO ME I • ' OR. v NA fYtot 3A \ i G1I` `�� Ytri/I"(1�itrit o')� 0 �4 nCI 5� \- / Pp 1 • ,,.• \ . 51TE PL4a..1 - 5,3821 SC k4FER RD i• - DE.L 452, T25N,, R,44E, N-t-k-- c 1..e -€._____ —fes +S -, �.� (7.1, ,fi # 7 z 320'5-3t o'er `=�.�e .L1-3 -/-2, 1--f < .7-Th.,0-t (., /,. /'L.L.,,, ‘11, c-LA v\" T Y ,ws —<-e /I ✓1,erc� /o c �(c:-,1",,, vY\'t<..(.-c-__.. (4' (_, t-, i /�/i. ///<r .. 7.--.-. (/( i,,1 )) • r.---41.1001•F \ . .. - J ilk, al .. . . 4 0,,n/ i -- __ . A/o 1 •• u -101 - 04 0 64 IA, , -((_,(e___ 0 t. (4 \ II nr (t C7 .(--;01/1 71 7- (0 CA i.(4--/ 114 0 4 4 i ( ,D—el .o- \1 N -cp (�' i)1 k �'/ # . N1 m t d zZ\ -i� \� k �,ty� r n` 4 4c `\`\ ,. / i „ o n ' t , 1�/r {/ „ io-I jot. 1 N If ilt) I „ii,C4 J 'Q W �� -.-it) / . ..., V I" 1 oi .,,, , (4, . , 4 .., 'D: f �Z • Q�� <377'\,/ ��� mts.3� O I �-r �.p �/ d W d x h v O > .,,,,.. (,_ 0Qr.,.. ., \ ;4,62_, ./ id, -,,..,\.., . „ 1 / /2 0 ,-/::, / \�et % . / ..), (/-/ i w , 0 ti e-,- C'q 7 4- of -7q411 / 17(- (l/' # - / 0 0 � �iled/- // // le-i-Z,--”, a.--i -ce- ( / Q.', =' a. i a ` 1 -., 1� \\ Yee---,--/4-4 , , . --6,5,-,-.7-4----,--2-e-----?°--zer---ffe---2- , , , ' . (.add ' ,/,,,, 4'.% 6.,6,- --cf___ hi /. , / s........4.4._ N ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY , WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF CUE-20-84; CRISP ) FINDINGS OF FACT, MANUFACTURED HOME FOR A DEPENDENT ) DECISION AND RELATIVE ) CONDITIONS THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County, in hearing the application (CUE-20-347, la. the purpose of establishing a temporary residence for a dependent relative, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal" , and the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County having held a public hearing on May 9 , 1984, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and further having visited the site and vicinity in question, and having rendered a decision on the 16th day of May , 1984, APPROVING said proposal , does hereby make the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1 . That the proposal is generally located east of the intersection of Old Schafer Road and Merry Court in Section 32-25-44. Parcel #32545-9071 . 2. That the proposal consists of establishing a temporary residence on the site for the care of the applicants mother and father in-laws who have been shown to be in need of care. 3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates Semi-Rural usage of the area encompassed by the proposal . 4. That the site is zoned Agricultural . 5. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal include generally urban density residential development with some open space and undeveloped land. 6. That the applicant indicated he understood the limitations imposed under the terms of Section 4.24.560 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, and understood that if the temporary residence is desired for more than one year the application will have to be renewed. 7. That the applicant submitted a written statement from a licensed physician stating the need for dependent care. 8. That the proposed site plan indicates that setbacks , parking, height of the structure(s) will conform to the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. 9. That no one appeared to oppose the proposal nor were any written comments adverse to the proposal received. 10. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met. CONCLUSION Following review of the Planning Department file, consideration of the public testimony, and circumstances in the area of proposal , the Zoning Adjustor concludes that the proposal is not detrimental and is compatible to the public health, safety and welfare. DECISION From the foregoing Findings , a review of the Planning Department file No. CUE-20-84, testimony at the public hearing, and a site visit, the Zoning Adjustor hereby in APPROVING the proposal establishes the following conditions : A. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 ) All buildings and structures require building permits as per Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code. . . . Continued ••^4f iIII FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONSill CUE-20-84 PAGE 2 A. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (CONTINUED) 2) The manufactured home at a minimum be thirty-five (35) feet or more in length and at least eight (8) feet in width constructed in accord- and with State of Washington or Federal manufactured home construction standards as evidenced by the attachment of an insignia, designed for transportation after fabrication on public streets and highways on its own chassis and wheels , and arriving at the site where it is placed on a foundation or tied down and skirted with a fire resistant material with towing-tongue emoved including the connection to electric power, water supply and"sewage disposal facilities. 3) A written statement from a licensed physician stating the nature of the medical problem shall be submitted with the application. 4) The manufactured home shall be occupied by either the dependent relative and family, or by the relative and family providing care to the dependent relative owning and occupying the principal residence. 5) Upon termination of the need for care or the sale or lease of the property, the applicant shall remove the manufactured home from the site within forty-five (45) days. 6) A statement shall be recorded in the County Auditors Office stating that the manufactured home is temporary and for the use of the dependent relative for which the Conditional Use Permit is approved and not considered a permanent structure to be transferred with the property if sold or leased. The statement shall include a legal description or recording information from the deed or sale agreement. 7) The placement of the manufactured home shall be in compliance with all plat dedications. 8) The temporary residence shall be "accessory" only to a parcel , or tract of land under the ownership or lease by the applicant for the Conditional Use Permit. 9) The mobility gear shall not be removed, and the unit shall not be permanently affixed to the land, except for temporary connections to utilities. 10) Only one temporary residence may be permitted on a lot, parcel or tract of land under the ownership or lease by the applicant for the Conditional Use Permit. 11 ) The permit shall be granted for a period of one year and may be renewed administratively by the Director of his designee upon the recertification by a licensed physician that the medical problem still requires care of person or property. The renewal period shall be every year from the date of the original permit. 12) Minimum lot size and frontage requirements for the zone in which the proposal is located shall apply to all applications. 13) Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regula- tions of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 14) The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improve- ments called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW Chapter 36.94. 15) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits from the Health Officer, the use of an on-site sewage disposal system may . be authorized. 411 III , . ,./r-------------- . FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS CUE-20-84 PAGE 3 Y A. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Continued) • 16) Water servie shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane) , State Department of Social and Health Services. 17) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 1/ /z/- / DAY OF7/ 1984. DATED THIS i ' if i /it) DO AS A ADAM , ZO IN ADJUSTOR SPOKANE ! NTY, WASHINGTON NOTE: ANY PERSON AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS DATE. A :'l"''-''''. IIMMIIII""Mjill.IIIIIIII.Meilli"IMMIMMIMMIII"Miaill"ell.III"Mil""Mil.MIIIII"Mill"lMil""1"""' ' i.. N 1.7 \ . i . - .... , , .0 \ /, - E / /1 -, ' . ,,.. -.-.-. /... . ' 4b(.. 4 -- < \ , .E...:.?w HOL,)S' ‘)... r l \PR 4< _ k. F.I Elf) , 4 , 1(-3„,j , „ ,• , \ .. \ ,'• . e p . , , .. c) .. . ....N, . a __..........„,....____ ____.........__ 'k - .....-..- - . _ 1 \ i .. ..... ...... . , 'k. ‘. . \ 1-, i L.. A.L'i .._ 4._ -, c4,.., -J. /)L Ir---3 C.: .•,' 14(1.F E.FIN r") L.1 , : •, .3, ,:- ‘.(1.G.-M.Ik„, ( C-(4'e- •••••07 C.,.._ / r„,:v _.,........,; <7 -.____IL Ar---__ANgismir • • d' c . N,., N Z # NN t ., \ ` a N ec . • v..,., Z` 3 \‘‘‘ ' \ N .. i\• �/ 7 b.) - y N 4.. 0 y 1 r /,-- "V Nw w -4 s`ybh f t ap v Y \ s7 / \ A, ,_.N;Ai AcixiVitco , t,4, 5. lr °7" O/ q� -, alN •os 0 d '%\ ars � aQ 41- " "Y" l/./ or 7 / d a o (41-tidi /41r/ 4 e-e-Zio"4.-,, a•-f..A z ( cp :71 e / /v/ w .% / / ry I -La, KL-C76 91AZ'fr 0,11 a f,e'''''' Cei t �l-6iet._2>'G ' / Z- 10 ,.....,..44._ 1.1 N 1 1 \f 7C 1 • n o, , 320 93.4a \ ' a .)' 9 to a� / ' © s_ !6 - /9, /1\ V12 3 ® 11 o8 �l_ joy I I5�©$ jr,/ I (�19 6© $ �p '° • tet)) .7.3- •#i tt° �.:� i.e.p 49 �J. * 'A40 / �� t 3j 0 S "�e 5 e 14 9 OP 50 ��► �'4 I`� �0 4' ti s",''<° ' 4' 15 a • © � p�Vl' 7 0 © � ,1-tZ. lik4 o it s' S�s°�'yw, 00 ` 0 1 306 es7 I ,'o ; .. '' oV - �0 L • '° recite)._ .. 1 Qin `=e� Z ® s ' ��9 2 a /0a "' R oP M �\ 3/ $. o- B 9496 \ �, (�� qk _® _ G 3 ..E iv.® 0 �} �I/12 -- -r °.. �� ` �) 50 = 3Z d 5s tin In •`.-'`_ H _l p 3 9 �s` 2 q° w Is 1 ,L O :, Ph 1 V �1 .�_ !� + 2243ci) ;/o �J G 6 • �VuM$ R-D ice' 00 60 4.<:7)-_„_ 2 O ;o m '° -3 ;� 'a Z°. s E.74 ° ' 9 y 2 q e9 rt so9 5.,s .� d 3,2-ss-¢f �, O 4 6 o. 1ej.)40,4--.,.. ... o 3.1.Is,vl r.r , qD' A'' 0 ' g `_ s ss e G '� Os ,O Y A 4 uO 'ate , 1.* 7 O� — I E 4 CCR. ��. tidi s O o A/ %- y/o %. s� F , i PONDEROSA 'DD/T/ON ..-L. �°\,� N , y. \ \ -124-"" 8 3 • \4'.. ..--4.-.* a..r 3 4.4 • • 63 r. �8L.� 9.34.06'' So 5• ^_ R,W �^ � 6o V `, ? 0 �/� 0 'el . & g ...- - ,,_, :' g :tV V 0 7 * u,ry 835, c /1/ ,\(1111 - \\ v;J-.9 53520- ' . P.-;w i ) ' BROADMOOR `s ESTATES \\ ` k \ `�E \ c gg \ 0 9 42 1.38_' . r �.I 4(7.65• o 0 ..1., -.'‘`.--t ci9l- '''1,::-.7.- ''' c .'\\v‘ W CI Nip 7 ri..., I % 1 \ 1-°T.\ i Oe c'`C 71) I,.,.. L1.3: 1 -"5:N _\ 4,_ a1. 0 1 % � o re ---Q- - :- 1 i _...,, Q ill4'' 1�' r o I SCH0 t D/57- No. 35k, �- C) CI — — _ t li PONOER058 kl- .nal-on Or. '] ti r ,, I 0,/x 1\ ,,, / /572,DirioN liz4 o.10 5 I p RE J L PG D°' 1 0 r D i1 . 411 • SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA: MAY 9, 1984 TELEPHONE NO. : 456-2205 TIME: 1 :15 P.M. PLACE: Spokane County Planning Department N. 721 Jefferson Street, Broadway Centre Bldg. , 2nd Floor Conference Room Spokane, WA 99260 APPLICATION WILL BE HEARD IN THE FOLLOWING ORDER. LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILES. A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 1 . CUW-35-83 PUBLIC UTILITY FACILITY Generally located south of the Sunset Highway and west of Craig Road in Section 27-25-41 . PROPOSAL_: To allow a telephone electronic switching facility to be located in • the Agricultural Zone. The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, Section 4.04. 170 (z) allows such a use with the granting of a conditional use permit. SITE SIZE: 12 ,500 square feet APPLICANT: Pacific Northwest Bell 2. CUE-20-84 MANUFACTURED HOME FOR A DEPENDENT RELATIVE Generally located east of the intersection of Old Shafer Road and Merry Ct. in Section 32-25-44.(c2 ✓In e r<< PROPOSAL: To allow a temporary manufactured home for a dependent relative to be (/' existing on the site , west of the 1� existing residence. The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, Section 4. 04. 170 (jj ) allows such a use in the Agricultural Zone with the granting of a Conditional Use Permit (Section 4.24. 560). SITE SIZE: 2.08 acres APPLICANT: Al Crisp 3. CUE-25-84 MANUFACTURED HOME FORA DEPENDENTRELATIVE Generally located south of Pleasant Prairie Road and west and adjacent Adams Road (Forker Road yextension) in Section 26-26-44. � c , PROPOSAL: To allow a temporary manufactured (,„,( home for a dependent relative to be ` located on the site, southeast of the existing residence. The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, Section 4.04. 170 (jj ) allows such a use in the Agricultural Zone with the ! granting of a Conditional Use Permit. . i ::' SITE SIZE: 5 acres APPLICANT : Melvin R. Maki :I 0 • s. .1000. .c- ' '34q,z "TM. a < AV E 2 i„zek1.,,,,,, ...7,Sip .i.,711° .•-. ••,..s::4 • . ,_ _ AZ, , iv. 7 its. ' ....7.Q.33 . • il:IP. t:'''';-*2 8 1"4-4 ti;; ,�, T H. y iw :1:T:1 mi, t• .% e. iv- � • , ► • z 0 VE. ri---; i o " 'l . ....._ ..,-,_ ..,___.: YI, .i,.,Fug.H. ' ° sa--:I '1E. I(1)c Z !O • ' J • I ST ; [ AS/Ell 't L3 � ', 4•.J 1' 2ND ' E-. ,am. \ �er�r.N ws�.r• c t . ..e. TH ' aa•elr 4 00.1 , 41 .i 4' J .\ n .04.A% —b.-• 'VII • \ X10 :::: e . ... P;� C. tea--' III \ '1\....:•t,,.6 e\ 1 - 7"")-4 k :. As vadmia \\ ...4,-pc ,-:,c ,.., riorem, ,,,,,i, •, 1 . 1 7 ul „,..r . ' •me... ' ••••'••:: - , s: 33 -- mq • r.,.9- I :aI r -- Z . ' \ r C 1 1 CUE2O844r 404 •. - .:.,...„.,...., : c,. .. , • • n% OD ig, ::T:': • Q j �`y. ....rf ' -, fp,0qO OA Qa. • 47vp Cr C .r .Ee 3 .�� �� 8R•Ko.4-519 43RD _ a .' c'S if ' CI ecT�Q SCH Q( �;' ( • a J~ 4%* a. .= CwESI` — EM CL� p. � 44r' ' A V E N ]S w 1 Qcr. ,,: �. ' J • J er 48TH AVE w 7, a , ,., ev6 4.G___._T>: 1 :J - ---.- ZONING ADJUSTOR HEAR. 0 TELEPHONE NO: 456-2274 , TIME: Wednesday, September 20, 1978, 1 :30 P.M. PLACE: N 721 Jefferson, Broadway Centre Bldg. Conference Room, (2nd Floor) VARIANCE 5. VE-106,-78,Lot Area & Setback Requirements a. Location: Section 32, Township 25, Range 44 E.W.M. That portion of Lot 1 , Block 4 of Ponderosa 2nd Addition, lying SEly of Schaffer Rd; C.P.R. 1147 in the SE 1/4 of NE 1/4 Parcel No. 32541-1114 b. Applicant: Peggy Tipping S 4003 Vandown Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Site Size: Approximately 8,095 sq.ft. d. Existing Zoning: Single Family Residential , est. 6/30/77 e. Variance Requested: To allow a single-family residence to be built on property having only 8,095sq.ft. lot size, whereas, the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires 10,000 sq.ft.lot size with the required setbacks, which the lot does not have. f. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.04A, Sections 4.04A.040 (a) and 4.04A.090 (a) (1 ) (2) (3) & (4) \\\ \ 1• �', .. . . . 1 , , :., :pm. \ b t A :-- . --- :7111kffigH- - \\. \ i% , >W N D i . - 1 4..a . , \ 7 98 1 99 100 101 102 I0? \ \*IitM 08 109 10I113 14 t 115I s''~moo 4 t CTS I , Sr --� • -% N- p ( 100 0 041 I i. v r 4r L�t C IF .l 4 _ J9 • r asra+ .�vi. — Ai inn.; t) 1\),,) ii) I 1 r_ „ay. .... .4�, • G 001°11tAl © ? . oti \ U �- r-- 4DM J11114 ��O V• • f/ S L ll d. Existing Zoning: Single Family Residential, estab 6/30/77 e. Variance Requested: To allow a single family residence to be built on property having only 8,095 sq. ft. lot size, whereas, the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires 10,000 sq. ft. lot size with the required setbacks, which the lot does not have. GI f. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.04A, Section 4.04A.040 (a) and 4.04A.090 (a) (1 ) (2) (3) and (4) 4.) LVIYIIVV MUJUJ !Lim rIIV UIIV UJ 6(. UKUtK Hearing: September 20, 1978 Minutes Written: April 27, 1979 VARIANCE VE -106-78, LOT AREA AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ZONING ADJUSTOR DECISION: After public testimony and review, the decision of the Zoning Adjustor is to approve the applicant's request for a Lot Area and Setback Requirement Variance in the Single Family Zone. A. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: Pursuant to Section 4.25.030 (b) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Adjustor has the responsibility of determining that the granting of a Variance will not be detrimental to the surrounding properties. In assuring compatibility, the Zoning Adjustor based his decision on the testimony presented at the September 20, 1978 Zoning Adjustor Hearing as well as criteria set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance for issuance of a Variance. The Zoning Adjustor hereby finds the following: 1. It was found that the strict application of 1+ he Zoning Ordinance would deprive the subject property of rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity. 2. Denial of the applicant's request would deprive the applicant of a minimum and basic use (i.e., single-family residence) which is compatible in size with other parcels in the vicinity. 3. After a site inspection, the Zoning Adjustor is of the opinion that the granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or in- jurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity. B. ORDER: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Short Plat Administrator, which shows compliance with the Short Plat Ordinance. 2. There shall be no further segregations or divisions of land unless said seg- regations are in compliance with State and local platting laws. 3. The applicant shall maintain his site design in substantial conformance with the "plot plan" on file with this application, and in any case, shall observe all setback requirements as prescribed by the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, 4. Prior to the release of building permits, the applicant shall receive from the Health Department, approval for septic. C. GENERAL DATA: a. Location: Section 32, Twn 25, Range 44, EWM That portion of Lot 1, Block 4 of Ponderosa 2nd Addition, lying SEIy� of Schaffer Road; CPR 1147 in the SE4 of NE4 Parcel #1:32541-1114 b. Applicant: Peggy Tipping South 4003 Vandown Spokane, WA 99206 c. Site Size: Approximately 8,095 sq. ft. d. Existing Zoning: Single Family Residential, estab 6/30/77 e. Variance Requested: To allow a single family residence to be built on property having only 8,095 sq. ft. lot size, whereas, the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires 10,000 sq. ft. lot size with the required setbacks, which the lot does not have. VL- /o6 -78 e i ... c,- i .' z -- 1 , , ) , . :\ ._\ ,c 01/4% li " s H\y\c\.�„-�v,m ,_.c ,i„. t ®.6 2 , N , / , .., ,,,,k, .0., , ' I, t. ‘..„ ip , ai • / V • ,;,, w• , . . ,� S‹..afk. 1"=Zoe ' f H � Eg/S/r8 c!- / / N o3v fl N /£ 12 i �.. J � r o+ 1 4" / / ,,,,,.:>: ': : ' ''''::: ^7 siac.ic. , ---• / /A _ ./ / Cof Argo. T So 95 ft' y/ r 4.$ per Spoks.•e , / Go....♦ E.r1 .,.ae rs V +- / /\�.�rKii 4 D % min //) .,TA 0 I x/ b v S K ' ,,^Q/ CL,QAENc� F. SIMPSoN EN61NE6Rs. \ti u. 109 ARGONNE RD i SPoKAN& , WA • 992.06 926 - 1322 r - a • y , , --; ' ' -tiaz- 42/-> DU ID NG CODES /11-ajd Lir , Zezezzlz) :. 1984 ]. .; , __ ,-- I, ,4 All/ .. _ / t, -, - ,A0..,,. .fi .-0-‘iev ..,lee.2.4 ___C-x:-?/- ____ .--/-/- --eee -- - 1---e-,---12 ) 2o / . y . d---e-N ( ' '--/---, • -'14°-f--4P-, tV' 1e_ 6‘ i ., CA"'e--1' .. —e1(2- - •,/ e--Idad .W/- / / - 2-6,-- -/-,--, 1 zt Gid- ,A,e22( �G Erp 2j 36), 2,)(Se.A.,y-e--e.9 ,zeW 99 / / I \/ . r iii;.P, \ p' 1. / )k, ._,.A. , ., - hc>N . k 0 • Pft '2'i 01/4\ of / O Le ir PROPOSEa F bPEFt1 f TO P1E. • //\. �.4 -w.ccouiRer� i/ :,- 40. + / 5.3 Eel 6G41A�FER �J ..:`:: t�� 14()USE °T �% Fav � + moi , /'� .�/ - • k/7Re.lu Ft o• a7. P- oPobar-\ \,( ' �/ r MOt'ILE PoME r /+ ) ,� / N on,, lost notj p{: rooti;G, PO ME .�aat, _ a \ OS \ ^ \ • o \ ; pP\ `D I T E PL 4.L x,3821 SCl-14.FER RD. SLc.. 32, T 25 N,, R.4 4 E , \ .\ % 4 PUILDING/SAFETY CODE VIOLATION INVESTIGATION ADDRESS: .1S`O/�f'z TYPE: • .I r '' tv NATURE: �xe_.,6etre a /(en CODE .SECT ION: CGte'.90 5r <%o.vi20 6Z6) �N / 0 E R . � � �-, �,p ONR .ADDRESS : .S m ,1YV1Ge NC FILE .NO: 1//c�V/- DATE.RECEIVED: S/ DATE .RESOLVED: //-e?-7 ZIP: PARCEL . NO: 00,6-146--- jra7/ SIZE : S. C �i<<. ZONE: A, . COMP.PLAN• I NVEST I GATOR : C), 0/T�.L7 LAST . I NSPECT . DATE : (RESOLVED BY:) �/ PROSECUTOR: COURT ORDER: DEAD: COMPLIANCE: ` SUMMARY .REMARKS 1 : ci a,/ecl`eu1 '�,� ✓rvi el7yl a c e SUMMARY .REMARKS 2 : i .A4 o d9c, � v= -o 4,14"- -i-pa,o4if-= i SUMMARY.REMARKS3: /19 r 4 l6—/ ------------ _ -- 1_ •5 -0.149 , 1 P. .,,,OP-041140-- - , 711: l 1 6 SbaZ -,Zi, Lea/ 1 / -/ -/./ z. 1 " 1- - ,s3z -7e7/- _W(7 -y-/ ,)-7/ ;2/ 1 I / I 1 _ rg _ , *-7( F- *\ , ,4 .- T ,27 _ -.7.,/, 7/ do:/-7e laki i-1 rJ sed 1,w),,,o) do, a0a21 1 - i_ ___ I . 1 ______ ___ ____J______ -wr,977,1 77:::.•r•. '"" I ‘ ,. ,, 11 , . • . s - ,- -- • ...-r•,""'-'-- k , , . . .. - _ - .., . .- .....--- ..."16-1,..begt al: fi: I I 1.• *4 I', ...- ir ........, AINI .-------- Lt lqtCAOG C) oci-eA Le p.J2 pot.4)-e..- ikm.i.4 () 61. N. nak /c144 -Pbse C ).- I 3 CACZ c-e_i-k • . git-4 ..._ - 0 14.eI'm ,reve_- 4. , (4 •- i 67D R44A, t‘r,,...r (/-e...tt ea) il ti-erw—r— ., - - ..-• , * . io,, -. . C.-4.9-4...?-e-•••‘. . • t .•IP. ,. CI • 4 r 4 t:e.:• lq, "P 3i 4 li • , I• 4 •••••••-""..... 'o•-• . .. .... - . .o.•r.r.'''''..-."r- o.... 41 I: ____---,---------- II .111111111111411 ...ollal 111. .....+, ' 'enita %.."o'L:''...t • "... ......- . ..: ... • • . 01f -' '.. 7 Villiii ' ''Nelle.,:i!..-., -: .*'^' *1 44i-. - ' .......... ... .yr ,.• -. --'. * -...'" ' , 'C'J''.- ,...,:`,..'- . t - -ok ... ., , . • of. 1:6' .', , OFFICE OF 'HE SWIM) ... -1tit;,, itilE Cc) :.(m ,.. , it .,1, PlA(W'JING DEPARTMENT -Ten.L: III ii'i�,i;�:�;, , i/EVA- �1► I a- I` ' ,+A-.:;lEU'' DATE September 21 1984 SrOKANC COUNTY COURT NOUSC To: FFILE NO. CUE-20-84 - (Crisp) FROM: ,Aeteve P. Horobiowski , Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Request for Reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit Pertaining to Dependent Relative. On September 21 , 1984, by a phone conversation with Mrs. Ann Bascetta, wherein Mrs. Bascetta claimed the dependent relative was performing strenuous work on his property which seemed to be in conflict with the physician`s letter, indicating Mr. Yates as having physical limitations. I informed Mrs. Bascetta that I could not justifiably reopen the public hearing at this time; however, if she could supply the file with photographs substantiating her claims as well as a written letter narrating her objections and Mr. Yates' activity, that I could possibly request a follow-up letter from the applicant's physican providing more medical information relating to Mr. Yates' physical limitations. SPH:cmw cc: 9Tom Davis, Dept, of Building and Safety t)e,,, (..4.____- 1 1 = TMTCCInCCT!`C Mcmn r.Ri= Mr'SiM ANlr I M (rt_icr v MIC DAV) Ponderosa di story stirs res Asking for patience from their neigh- bors, Al and Lorrie Crisp hope tot lay to rest any concerns about the mobile home on their Ponderosa property. "Let us complete the landscaping and prove our intent to be good neigh- bors, said Crisp in a letter to the Spokane Valley Herald. The Crisps unwittingly became center of controversy when a neigh- bor complained about the mobile home that houses. Mrs. Crisp's dependent parents, Curley and Myrt. Until that time, said Al, he thought things were fine. "We found out we could be issued a temporary permit for a dependent relative under our zoning (agri- cultural suburban)," he. said, "as long as we could satisfy all the per- mit requirements and present our case to the satisfaction of the hearing officer. We obtained all necessary permits, closely following the direc- tion of all the various county author- ities to be sure we were within our rights, as this all represented a heavy financial commitment." CRISP POINTED out that not • one. ghboror property owner ap- atecLat_the hearing, that mailings went -but notifying neighbors : as re- quired. "Only .two parties.. questioned. us . about it before or after the hearing and they had no objections," said , Crisp. "Only after the mobile home=' was in place did we hharany oppo- sition. Of course, prior to its deliv- ery, heavy equipment was actively at the scene preparing the location cerned enough to question us." First concern came when the Crisp's •neighbor, Ann Bascetta, noticed them extending their fence line 'across the old Schafer Road, a right of way that was abandoned when the present Schafer Road was developed. "This piece of property was not substantial enough to be a home site and therefore was offered for 'pur- chase from the county to the adjoin- ing property owners," Crisp ex- plained. He purchased the land as a control against parked cars, safety hazards and the inevitable beer bottles that were tossed onto his property. And, he noted, the mobile home purchased by his in-laws, now sits on a piece of property where once was situated the Bascetta motor home. CRISP ADDED HE couldn't under- stand that relocating his in-laws' home 40 or 50 feet away from its pres- ent site would change value of prop- erties. "Believe me, we would be the last ones to intentionally do something to inhibit the sale of her (Bascetta's) house and her subsequent relo- cation," he said. "For what itis worth, l suggested to my in-laws at the outset treat the, look for a nice used mobile home to save money. They opted, on their own, to pur- "chase a brand new one to help assure its acceptance to this fineneigh- borhood as well as to complement our `ranch.' " Hopefully, said Crisp, residents of • >Continued from Page 1 they are. "We have dune no wrong," he noted, "Wc mean no harm." Crisp, who until last February worked for B&B Distributors, but since has gone into consulting work, and his wife moved to their home three years ago. Mrs. Crisp trains horses for Playfair Race Course and the property was zoned per- fectly for thein to house the animals during the winter months. HETI FATHER HAS regres- sive health problems arid so they sold their home of 29 years in Spokane and put the money into the mobile home and, said Crisp, into a motorhome so "they could enjoy their final times together for traveling, fish - There would be no more worries about ongoing maintenance of their old home nor concerns about its security in their ab- sence. Three weeks ago a couple Ponderosa residents, Bas- cetta and Lyle Hatcher, called the Valley Herald expressing concerns, it was pointed out by county officials that everything the Crisps had done was correct. The main conflict came because differently zoned properties abutted each other. The Crisps, concerned about ,the health of their relatives, expressed the hope that the neighbors could understand their position and would wel- come their parents as an in- tegral part of the com- irs past. rzychodzin, Freeman su- ent for just over two plained that the district's .ectors istrying tbchange ie contract'' language to ne with contracts existing ler area districts. something that was total- ine, then I could under - en there has been no move- Rher side, Przychodzin assessment is that "the :oing to have to remain firm." :sident Jody Baxter issues :tedsponse that the re i villing to give up str 1gth that has been ,r the years. problem right now, Bax - ring a Tuesday interview, ,IIIC e 1[1:Tc,sIvreenamrarenour.- she said. Correction The Valley Herald last week in- correctly reported that Jesse Richardson, E12502 Valleyway. was included in the Pines Road sewer utilities improvement dis- trict (ULID). His property is a few blocks east of the boundaries of that ULID. Richardson told the Valley Herald his only interest in pro- moting the quarter -cent sales tax referendum on the election ballot was to help those within the ULID pay for their sewer assessments. Richardson was head of a group named Concerned About. Sewer Expense (CASE). Ponderosa residents upset by new neighbor Conflicting Spokane County zoning ordinances have Ponderosa neigh- bors upset with each other over lo- cation of a mobile home. The home in question is situated on an abandoned right-of-way that is an adjunct to Schafer Road and runs perpendicular through Mercy Drive. The abandoned blacktopped road is part of property owned by Alan and Lorrie Crisp. They were granted a conditional use permit for a year to place the mobile home on their prop erty for use by a dependent relative. Crisp, district manager for B&B Dis- tributors, and his wife Lorrie, a horse trainer, own more than two acres of agriculturally zoned land. Next door to the Crisps lives Ann Bascetta, owner of River City Furni- ture Manufacturing. She lives 'at S3812 Mercy Drive, across the right- of-way from the Crisps, who live at S3821 Schafer. The mobile home rests inbetween. Bascetta owns property that is zoned R-1 (resi- dential). AND THEREIN LIES the problem. "The county attorney is worried that the Crisps are going to sue and worried that I'm going to sue," Bas- cetta said. They were allowed to install the mobile home, she and some_ neigh- bors contend that property values have been reduced and that the home should be moved. "All the homes are worth $70,000 and up," said Bascetta, . "and this just devaluates them. I lost a sale of my home." Residents aren't quibbling so much over the mobile home as to its placement. Doug Adams, county zoning adjustor, admitted that the home is located 30-40 feet from where it was to be on the original plot plan. "The problem is that R-1 prohibits mobile homes, but that agricultural allows for a dependent relative," Adams explained. "The Crisps were granted the conditional use permit for a year. No one was at the public hearing." SINCE THEN, RESIDENTS have raised concerns about lack of proper notification and have voiced their complaints with .Spokane County Commissioner Keith Shepard. Bas- cetta and Lyle Hatcher, a Valley realtor and neighbor who called the Valley Herald with the original com- plaint, say they have had inadequate response. Adams noted that county officials and legal authorities were working on reaching an agreement among the neighbors. And, he added, the conditional use permit is reviewed annually. "When a developer creates a sub- division, he asks for a zone change from agricultural to either R-1 or agricultural suburban to omit mo- bile homes or allow only for double wides," Adams expalined. "You'd be surprised how much agricultural:.. land butts up against R-1 or •agri cultural suburban." aria; -- None o€:the,above?: nese -- Andrea Stuart 9casi4" iges industr; layoffs- s R.oad.... _.. yyia Id up. 13u blow int . ... .42 29 ' 45 27. ....46 31 .42 28.'. (r a chance of snow tures into the teens. ale Weather Service says th oceasinn'aI periods of neto two inehes could re forecast for Sunday, r,1E, c■ cry Mobile home in question rests between houses on abandoned right-of-way in Ponderosa. 0 OC' 1 4t LID _I Ot.o/2 74 e. a: _De -h.rTh iNS rtak de S4 6 Si*n 4: f 671 oolni*hcie. own til el wile— ckcisIdyl 1 �'aKc-t.... No xi- corms Ittvic c C� n I ! aj;teI __ - a4xz�L G tAi I eud ED>7-14 eiseti44< I1 Q c.c1r ce "l A liwii. E j 3a►^ y eti 60\ I.ss4 G : press/n F l oev ktit4 L.0, p(Sh, o iocv 4 Ai. . , tqfprocmai cQewta cake -- nD — ir • f ‘ isPes‘ f for lw rc. CciNvtl:D) r ) C 0QAP 4 i 4,41 (wt. 3 Cour t Cour`' e 407, ( ,voit/Q'i,-/Acw (10,4 14. ti DP- t11#1.1 t 14-1 os. '"k decic'cvi I rLc9 /r uircn1 It 6 r\e i1I r� lr ± � no �o-m 0010 ) > j�'ARINc 'Vote( _ YeS— fisayn,A., e+4. 1 S4 W I co., I Approve rip 4petd no q V4I rfr?e) f • I ir & d ec' 7e,re 7/3 d ec' .,..Tpe &kV, 17 42.441 Crt ' p t•Alf17 It a vo(uk �4r i2'rAid lv re(0cr 01.14. fi e rn C CNYt 7 ir6 6 /Oc > /4 ' burr nd 0;y /0/2v44 Aee.1 . ccs cfSmss &s iL tt C rc-i_ __ se s*- 1 y a . ed::•65 .S.Z. . Co reseOng.; KEITH VI) mpARD RECEIVED COUNTY COMMISSIONER OCT 2 1984 BUILDING CODES ( V(e;r://4 dist 1 /Lt ct-, mFMO TO: Keith S..epard, Commissioner FROM: Jazzes P. L•'macio, Chiei Civil Deputy LATE: October 24 , .i.984 KF : `.otice in Conjunction with CUE-20-84 (:-;anufactured Home for a Dependent Relative ) Applicant Crisp Recently, you requested that the Prosecu+_in4 TIttorn.,y ' -> office review the public notice mailed to urroun•iin ' property owners in conjunction witn CUE:-2O-64 (Mar.uiacture'J Home for Dependent Relative ) , Applicant Al Cris,. In particular , Anne Rascetta , an adjoinin,j prooerty owner , contends that altnoug;i srie received the Notice of +'u )i1C •-caring, that due to several irregularities within the notice, she was misled as to the location of the propos- al , and accordingly did not appear at the public hearing to object to the same. ' t the outset ,' oetore reviewing the legal Oaram- eter :,urrounding your inquiry, I oelieve it is necessary to oreiily reiterate the provisions of state law governing notices . 'ZCW Section 36 . 70. 6411 establistie, tb ' reuirernents of public notice with re..;.aru to conditional 1, : .>c rmit , .• That y'ction requires pub is notice or :Burl n__itin t") mails i to all property owner , or recoru within 100 leet of the exterior boundaries of the subject pro;)3rt ,;. '1 ne n 'tice niust be :tailed not l 'ss than ..lays orior to thi' nearing . suoi ane County Zoning Ordinance Section 4. 25. 0.)0 further clarifies the Public notice require.nents . 'What sec- tion re culres the puolic notice to soeciticaliy advise of the " . . . time, place and purpose of the nuoiic hearing. " Pur _uant no ''hr.vt-4 cited statutory and code pro- visions , the applicant in the instant timely mailed notice of the conditional use permit 'searing to the appropriate surrounding property owners . It is not contested by Mrs . Bascetta that she did receive the notice. Mrs . Bascetta 1 F. Keith Shepard, Commissioner October 24 , 1984 Page Two contends , however , that the notice was misleading and due to its misleading nature she did not appear at the public hearing to contest the conditional use permit application. For your ease of reference, I have enclosed a pho- tocopy of the notice mailed to Mrs. Bascetta. Nrs . Bascetta contends that the notice was defec- tive in three particulars . Firstly, it made reference to "Marry" ::ourt . It should have made reference to "Mercy" Court . Secondly, it made reference to "Old Shaffer Road. " Mrs. Bascetta contends that although she is aware that Shatter Road is Known as "Old" Snaffer Road, most property owners in the vicinity would not have been so apprised. Finally, the notice indicates that the manufactured home for the aepeadent relative would be located "east" of the inter- section rf Old Shaffer Road anu Mary Court. In particular , that is not precisely accurate. In conjunction with the public notice advising surrounaine urooerty owners of the above information, toe public notice also contained the following information : 1 . Time and place of public hearing on item. 2 . A .statement to the effect that "iegal 1`s tion= an.:t orciect details for these projects are available in the Planning Department files . " 3 . The name of tre applicant, "Al 'Dtiti.^_ tlon +_i', i+t the temporary home for L e depenent relative to Oe located on t ;: Crisp property would be west or my. . Crisp ' s existing r`s, i.Jence . A mao outlini[i'7 in clads the locution oC tre Crisp property. in reviewing the aoove con:'e ras OL :•1Cs . ':ascetta , in li :ant of the notice which was; mailed to her , and additionally the provisions of state law, it is the opinion or ie_aal couns31 twat tie notice as met the is;al require- ments . 411 410 F. Leith Shepard, Commissioner October 24 , 1984 Page Three The Washington Supreme Court, in interpretini whether or not the notice of a public hearing is adequate, has adoptea the standard that the notice required must "fairly and sufficiently apprise those who may be effected by the proposed action of the nature and character of the amend- ments so that they may intelligently prepare for the hearing. " Barry_v. Kitsap Count', 84 Wn. 2d 579 , 585 , 527 P. 2u 1377 (1974) , Glaspey & Sons v. Conrad, 83 Wn. 2d 707 , 71J , 521 P. 1d 1173 (1174) . Applying the aoove general rule of law to the notice mailed out in conjunction with CUE-20-84 (Manu :actureo Home for a Dependent Relative) , it is the opin- ion of legal counsel that the purpose of the public hearing has peen adequately set forth so that it fairly and suf- ficiently apprises those who may pe effected by the proposed action kJr the nature and character of the same. Ja particular , the notification includes a mao wnic:, accurately aepicts the applicant ' s property. Additionally, the notification includes the name of the applicant and notification that additional information can be ootainea from the Planning Department concerning the apolication. Althougn certain inaccuracies in other infor- mation set forth on the notice may, in fact , exist, the map , applicant ' s name, and direction that additional information ina%+ be obtained from the Planning Department Office cure any possir,le deject or confusion which existed in the public notice. 1. uop i the prior drier scenario wi Ll clear u7 the concern. which Mrs. Bascetti has concerning tne 2uol.ic notice on this item. I nave contacted Ar--; . coma uni ace.i to her my legal conclusions. is J. a. . • 9,2u -P41 711°44 aart' .407z cz,.0 —401-e4 "ifs// 4,e.Leef 7,/,4„. • • — „te-- ��M Je/%i, S ' 1!.R ROAD No 32 S S11) t► ,I) 179 411. VIA 712 FAr-E 11 j 1 ( U I T C AIM DEED The Grantor, Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at West 1116 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, for One Dollar and other valuable consideration, conveys and quit claims to Allen D. Crisp and Lorrie B. Crisp, husband and wife, the following described real estate, situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, together with all after acquired title of the Grantor therein: That portion of the old Schafer Road (60 feet wide) lying Southwesterly of the Southerly right—of—way line of Mercy Drive extended and lying Northerly of the Northeasterly line of Lot 7, Block 1 , Ponderosa First Addition extended, to the centerline of Schafer Road and Northerly of the Northerly line of Lot 1, Block 4 of Ponderosa Second Addition extended to the centerline of Schafer Road, Located in Section 32, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M. Dated this 27th day of August , 1984 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CT:ieda."244 !fI.W'oR'n£COI REnue ST OP „gyp iny R*lgineer Sir g 110: PH '• 1 a WiLLIA1 ' NAMUL ISPIKAN , '� . XXX tei ATTEST: courthouse WILLIAM E. DONAHUE Clerk of the Board STATE OF WASHINTON ) ) as COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) On this ,2 7 day of , 197y, before me, the under— signed, a Notary Public in and for e State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared JOHN R. McBRIDE, F. KEITH SHEPARD and GRANT PETERSON to me known to be the Commissioners of the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, a political subdivision that executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and the deed of said political subdivision, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that they were author— ized to execute the said instrument and that the seal affixed is the corporate seal of this political subdivision. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first above written. Excise Tax Paid on Sale Amt Pd � � � • .! .i. • 911- DE "SKIP' CHILBERG otary Public, in atld' t Spokane County Treat State of Washington,. ri . R$ S4f, './"--J7' /;S/ d y at Spokane. .. Gr i t. " • 18316 UEFOFE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON F..:OLUTION NO. 8 466 TN THIE MATTER OF ThE VACATION OF ) ) OLD SCHAFER ROAD ) Preliminary Resolution ) "VACATION" i HN`I'Y ENGINEER ' S ROAD FILE NO . 32-S ) WHEREAS, it is the majority opinion of the Board of County Commissioners I Spokane County , Washington that OLD SCHAFER ROAD considered useless and is no ' orger needed as a part of the general road ysten in the County and that the public will be benefitted by its vacation ir.d abandonment , and the Board hereby declares its intention to vacate and ;t.arelon the same in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 187 of the cf Washington, 1937 . THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane 'cur_ty , Washington that the County Road Engineer be and he hereby is directed - o make an exan ; nati.;r of the portion of the aforesaid road which is proposed t- be vacatea , and report thereon and to set a date for hearing on the said :'Fport and cause ' c. tice thereof to be published and posted as required by law, >>.ch road to be vacated being more particularly described as follows : OLD SCHAFER ROAD - beginning at the northerly right of way line of Sundown Drive extended, thence northeasterly to the southerly right of way line of Mercy Drive extended. Located in the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 32, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioner of Spokane County, Washington this 13th day of April , 1978 • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 4/Oraget— -044P-- ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND • r OF THE :, ' ' , • 4- f Deputy �' • • RESOLUTION NO. ?b 613 IN THE MATTER OF VACATION OF OLD SCHAFER ROAD RESOLUTION - VACATION COUNTY ENGINEER' S ROAD FILE NO. 32-S ) This being the day set for the hearing on the County Road Engineer' s Report on the proposed vacation of OLD SCHAFER ROAD proceedings for which were initiated by Preliminary Resolution No. 78-466 , and it appearing to the Board on proof duly made that notice of the hearing was published and posted in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after examining all claims and all maps and papers on file and after hearing the evidence adduced at the hearing and it appearing that the hereinafter described road OLD SCHAFER ROAD )s useless and the same is no longer needed as a part of the general road system within the County and that tie public will he benefited by such vacation. THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, 44ashington, that the hereinafter described portion of public road to-wit : OLE SCHAFER ROAD - beginning at the northerly right-of-way line of Sundown Drive extended, thence northeasterly to the southerly right-of-way line of Mercy Drive - extended. - i Located in the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 32, Township 25 North , Range 44 E.W.M. be and the same hereby is vacated in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 36.87 R. C.W., subject to certification to the Clerk of the Board by the County Engineer that the necessary utility easements have been granted; and subject to the certification to the Clerk of the Board by the County Engineer that $2,184 has been paid into the :aunty Road Fund for this vacated right of way. PASSED AND ADOPTED By the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Wa_s.' ncton, this 11th day of May , 1978. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON HARRY M. LARNED, CHM. RAY W. CHRISTENSEN JERRY C. KOPET • SPOKANE, WASnitiGTOR • IN THE MATTER OF VACATION OF OLD SCHAFER ROAD ) County Road Engineer's Report COUNTY ENGINEER' S ROAD FILE NO. 32-S ) To The Honorable Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington Gentlemen: I have had an examination and an investigation made of the road_ which is proposed to be vacated, proceedings for which were initiated by Preliminary Resolution No. 78-466 on April 13, 1978 Such road to be vacated being more particularly described as follows: OLD SCHAFER ROAD - beginning at the northerly right-of-way line of Sundown Drive extended, thence northeasterly to the southerly right-of-way line of Mercy Drive extended. Located in the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 32, Township 25 North , Range 44 E.W. M. Subject to certification to the Clerk of the Board by the County Engineer that the necessary utility easements have been granted; and subject to the certification to the Clerk of the Board by the County Engineer that $2,184 has been paid into the County Road Fund for this vacated right of way. My recommendation is made subject to the objections of the adjacent property owners at the hearing. It is not necessary or advisable to preserve the hereinbefore described road_ for the public road system in the future. The public will be benefited by its vacation and abandonment and I , therefore, recommend that the same be vacated. Dated this 11th day of May , 1978. ) (: 1;/—/:// R be t)S. Turner, P.E. Spokane County Engineer .. , , .‘,.. . . , .:: ,....- ' ,:',..:-,,:::.4,4,,,4-*.,,,,..:iitiosc-''' '''''' '*::::-''',,,:it'l,,' �i -.;,:_,.w,..:.:, ;' � 1.,.,,.-4,-,!..4.-:.-,,/,.,.1.) x� m ver ,� � +i'4P � C�'P•,„.�t v *Fs�� i� �c�y"}n trk � _ yq, y i y i �'•R, h 3 6 ••••.•••-_,---,.4. 4,1.10, .u�.1£ Y r.C S i k,... 'Y '3 '4.-i4'--,�. .p :+ ��'yy[[""• .Y fi�gg-� 4 •� *`.} ,', f�; .-. .y. nW t7. AC r.,w.Jw- x » � y lja t4 $ x yk sem'- '. 4 eNiif x - ,11,71;,•:f)„,44' fig+ • e;;44�t "W'''' a t 4 �'''',if*9'e C`eF e r $r 4v �'' F t ' ' '' Y r.<- " Vit',. t i� g �; }w i �, r37�''�din T:-.,... "-� - ! '�T ,mak i' �+T' i s-x, Al`„,,,,,,-.i .ms s L $ ` ;7( 7�,� Ate, 7;,'"--:',‘•'---; 7 +, ,�s ,.. a . "y '..--'-'-',f-4 -`A M ge�y 4 *Inr..,'' '.1.-^l''',".'-?4,.- ..,'.:4-1..!-, 1,''''• # ` .; . '4'-';',.'Z'-':'1.***° '. .``Y. t-$ 3,-,"_"'La?'”...,;" 4 r+ $' 7 ' >r ,',44.,,}7.41:,.:'-'K`1,..;ia ';s 4 ":4::?-:,1-4,`•( ', ;,�' '"•'''-...:'1,76::•F-].•:,:::.‘ 't w [!_: +e ix • , x<'yet a� 4 -.--,a'�, , s "" '-'Sd�n' • 4•; APs "�r".� T,, 4 k q. ---.. -,,.-„,-4--,-. � i r ro� 3x ti�,. r ro s k { -6t" ' 'f •,_;;;,,,g4i7',0,-,4,:i4.,4,?• -4,...!,--o•,;-_--,..--,....c..?4,-.,N,',. ,, .., ., 77 Z ti 9rY x � ••4'04'L. Lt .R 4 Yrg � - ° 4�a ? J i ; T � ?FI •,-,,---.',�� r! k . aW ,p � yirt -a; v � rr ;fg gt .s �. t•t Xs r • ••.,-,,,,,,,,,i 't � . • • dr4 ., k ; - r ik `,,„,....,:i.:•-z•-4,1#.;,3.f-,IX., ted x,` yfi ry r -r-,,,,,,-, 4,t7,..,4,-1.1.., Xr ,. ... aayJ �° 3•,,,),',,,i,,,-, B y, •*-4s "--'"7----t-;"-"--•-': 4, ' Y ,, * . .*•. - � ia' t, ma �i, a ,y`ai, y �rw? fi f - F•'a.-,,,,,,,,,,:k,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,;4_,,,,,,,5 ' " *i''''ll, � `>� d. ' , kEyY t ,,-,,,4-,;--6.,,,,,,i, � - ,,,-&-,.. :y ;; C { • •,�' a , • , � x' Ar Y• e fit " 1,;-'',r"..- AK`', e4 -^ '6 �, *- r tia . : 7.� e k:• �b t-ss ,5 k.. ' . .t i* ''7rt• ,� N ;S-- - `a'.zt- fk.t ;Az -- * � -' 4 ♦ Fr • a ' j' 4 , 4A-k 0. yks J W ' 1 f " .; zyea.^ "A A ,"' ; r $ �p.),"41 tx ,, r • • �� , u Pi" VKi n. 'n r: x ::F {Y 9 ` ei ' > '.'.:-;:.="ttt-4 Pr:1:::::-..'''' t ,. 4 f __.-. --- 0 II .'F': - Cly.. ;.'„‘t,' r J „yc 1 _ . $,+y•�1L��'R..�k".• �"� -,a.:., ✓'Y # 'd ;'t r tr> aawn -7:i•-°"---;--!:',..4.: ^ ha § 4SrcUt 9Y� rr .y ,0. s " • ? _ .3 P rg • • ,.. .._ • , • _ V • .. € tt y` •z k :, " '1.1,"..; .ry '` `' "�F M. 'k 4 r ,, ry ` ,. Zeq &w x�t.q ^u S'n' 'k�W f- SAr b` $. - 31'n ' VP k .z.:t"s" Y 3`4s` ,� ' °,,, r f �r1C�1 �` :' v is. wry. ,. 44d . : ro+K� '-.;;;7. fR.'} sF -.*:,:..1.41„!..f4 x'S ty r ,' 1 t � . N i '- 7 '-.,,'.."''''''''''.4**';',--''''' °, t ' y s ! C '4 't`at , �� '- r"..- Ax"'',.',.4.. 4-).4"4.4r4.. :,-, .•1` < r:e s:N _.,k ti.'''1'.1: 7tX r�' H � { r' � t� E rn`� ,F 4.-..d 7 1 --".`-4,7-;:"•,- • � y $�` „ q r, } ,4Y� - is a?.t .‘ ., x V t� 3 ldj 6 r''4'-'1"':'''.-.!;'''.12-4.,,,,,,,•74;V`-',.. .it k i .;r 'r" i x 4:> .tet .'sem Si`to dF 5 + '"3'R M ` t c.• tr � I sl`"314 ' '.,.,:e'� ' "t -'A k t .z Sri Al b,r a s »s - '� : a fig.' .is�`x da .' '*'" � r ` t"J .:„. k✓k`,::+ °'e. #s `*+fie -,: ev k f. sT tet '�;*x t i e 'z Y ' .e. a . 4),?4414'�?t` r .,#` a t v� >. �" �r,`.a s'7 s,At t-". y,h ,„� ,. t ,. "x E..-"'..;,,;.,„..V4`1-,...k.' Y6 ar• t - -44E as sa( a t ;r i,� y R:. t • ,3 r z",r i " `, d yt`�!Sad baa - ,_1',. '-- „4.,..........--, 4 k: ,_y, w n. „.t *, "S,fT. +fi �� R '4. k.-'''''';'*-'-'''-i''''''''' � ' '',.‘,.141',.. , --- --.-„,:•4.-,-...,,t,”` ,ft7'� x Ict...',/ }4TOk v^t'i s.t�r - z, F r t 1?: Y..n so-N, t.c' r + lra 4 x ,�s >a-T.!.ds, t rn`y 6 yyy �"`s m �. �'SYS+,-1wr _ ,I i3Ft !! .']3 1k' ,t, 1 Y W .., • lk k ' - 5,.',„:„..4,1-,:, �i3T rtx f 3 t ."4 f T Z` • r i '-','"'%!,-1 r , eF',,,,-;.;'-$:::,,-,'",i-.➢ 3:`,t +51.-". ;d�x'+`i�' q x..' - ;, s4r K' ti..,_IR. t r . e 6 r9 #75> • w P a - h d 1p)4 ▪ ��aa� • t. • .., 0r,�*i/ii rxu` ', k,`,• �t2�t r.♦ •:-1fr ss-ate—-msg., , y`y��t A`1t. r,5 s :f}y x Cet:14*X „�f�• 0 .Y1iuiit,stz I �,iI4. ...rrf t t� Y ,,•,4-,-.; ti # y et' - . Vk+t� _¢ '?�.�' -i a '`� ar'� '',,.--- .4-.:,.,-., t' 'rz r'�e_ 'w,r- "`: ay`' r ;- ?;4.,.4,"'"..,z ` - - ,� ,.. k v' ;je; `�F `n"ra; '� r,S. .its a ' , ...,; s t ;? .. ... .-1,;-1,` ''•;^i`t ' . ' - sa, 'S , -i &zcsR'ry"` -.= M - tx _•"°ot"n.q r- a `,„Y,�. „'Z rt'r� i.3 "'� • § sK €"rrr '�z'+4. s z� 'f:,.• �.rr fyxky . h. A+,R... � a �'. as, ! ,M,� kr„ 5; • ,-- K x x. -'''- s , '' rk -. '.;:t tom S ++ 5 ,. .-;17-.:4.;,:,,:,,';',-'4';'''.1.' w w; 'y. '';;;•g zt' 4. �`' 3, a " Y ':':fit ,,(': -J''''‘‘'''' ' '' Y� t]'.y;,s;;e,'�,? ] L i`t i vt C E`�1C 9t1:fi3 Ce �:. � � i' .. L y .4.. .,„F'';''' '' z +�- y4-. �r ,y a ' 8 *.3+, ,3., --' .,, - ij 4. r �� � • * - . ,. * r x �F., }tno' s ` i ,, Er'� €t±ktx- "` ,. k ' ✓ T f'‘.4.1.05<1 Y3 ' - y ' h .. s k • s»sed rr "-r = �'a ' ' '•%x r ,. J '4 w; 41,,,--,2:.,/ s a x ,4F`}' 7 resr .l 1 g`: '+.Y `}� u Y. k e -. 2k +:c��,F + t 4 Zed' #, t .., i>' S„ a.2 Y S5 t ,,w�. y.2 :—..1''.- ' �%ire,._4,....„-,--, w •.i Ts {.+. s 4> a.,P. x" ;.$f**;..,-..., 'r ft - r 's.` Yom' '"'c-t'� 3 `", -u' ' aa .e^.t c .,.��.-r �'rd#;''� t';-Y t t a 3 z#t. ,.3 , ` { L f,•' �'rri 4�?.§Qe`�. 7 f.�. ;+2' t 3 y•-'-'-' 4 1 L a"r t '4.° x`ti v c r a � g .f >Z•4 , FEW :,� Yj � ' �S 1�„ s �,��, ` v ,};��� r: 4 ;e 2 Time / z� LE YOU WERE OUT // ?a Code : - 709 9 Number Extension NED ( \\ T c` PLEASE CALL 13 SEE YOU WHILE YOU WERE OUT M CLc�, , WILL CALL AGAIN Phone 0 SEE YOU TELEPHONED URGENT PLEASE CALL RETURNED YOUR CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU 77/ Operator 23-000 50 SHT. PAD CY® 23-001 250 SHT. DISPENSER BOX AMPAD EFFICIENCY® 23-000 50 SHT PAD 23-001 250 SHT. DISPENSER BOX Date Time WHILE YOU WERE OUT M /9"/"1 of Phone 3 a Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED ( \\ T c` Z Date ./, — 3 — , Time WHILE YOU WERE OUT M CLc�, , of L-5-14 [.t VI Cl ',Ce�V Phone Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED URGENT PLEASE CALL RETURNED YOUR CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message 1;> Operator AMPAD EFFICIENCY® 23-000 50 SHT PAD 23-001 250 SHT. DISPENSER BOX Date Time WHILE YOU WERE OUT M /9"/"1 of Phone 3 a Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message S LU �9 / /4/ �— To 71-/E.19 FWD /oa g'% /6;1,4 (7. 0/ 1 0/. Operator AMPAD EFFICIENCY® 23-000 50 SHT PAD 23-001 250 SHT. DISPENSER BOX