Loading...
2016, 11-30 Special Fesibility Study MINUTES Special Joint Meeting Spokane Valley City Council,Liberty Lake City Council, and Spokane County Board of County Commissioners Wednesday,November 30, 2016 3:00 p.m.—5:00 p.m. CenterPlace Regional Event Center, Room 109 2426 N Discovery Place, Spokane Valley, Washington Attendance: S.7okane Valle Council LibertLake Council Board o Conn Commissioners Rod Higgins, Mayor Steve Peterson, Mayor Shell)'O'Quin, Chair Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Hugh Severs, Council Member Josh Kerns, Commissioner Caleb Collier, Councihnember Dan Dunne, Council Member Pam Haley, Councilmember Shane Brickner, Council Member Mike Munch, Councilrnen:ber Jessica McGuire, Council Member Ed Pace, Councilmember Sam JVood, Councihnemaber Staff: Mark Calhoun, City Manager Katy Allen, City Administrator John Hohmlan, CED Manager Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director Mike Stone, Parks &Rec Director Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Higgins called the Spokane Valley meeting to order at 3:00 p.m. City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Munch. As it was understood that Councilmember Munch would be attending the meeting, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councihnember Munch until he arrives. The Liberty Lake meeting was also called to order. Commissioner O'Quinn then called the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners meeting to order at 3:03 p.m.; noting in attendance Commissioner Kearns,and the absence of Commissioner French. [Councilmember Munch arrived at 3:15 p.m] 1. Welcome &Review of Meeting Agenda—Shelly O'Ouinn Commissioner O'Quinn welcomed everyone to the meeting to hear about the feasibility/economic impact study results,which study she said has been a long time in the making,and which was the result of the City of Spokane Valley,the City of Liberty Lake, Spokane County, the Central Valley School District, and the Sports Commission's collaborative efforts to procure the services of the Conventions, Sports & Leisure International(CSL)company to complete the study,the purpose of which was to consider a potential sports complex on land located within the City of Liberty Lake near the HUB Facility, and for potential major enhancements to Spokane County's existing Plante's Ferry Sports Stadium Facility. After everyone in the room introduced themselves, Commissioner O'Quinn introduced Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Golf Director Mr. Doug Chase who introduced Mr. Bill Krueger, Principal with CSL, a leading advisory group and planning firm specializing in this type of study. Mr. Krueger, with the aid of his PowerPoint presentation, explained that this study began in the early part of the year, and that the full report can be seen at the County's website;he gave some of his background as well as that of his company, and said that event facilities are his company's specialty. Mr. Krueger said the charge given to him was, do we need something new and if so—what, and to include statistics, costs, etc., in examining two concepts:the Plantes Ferry location,and the HUB Development. He explained about the two initial concepts and went into the Phase 1 and Phase 2 study components, which were market demand Special Joint Meeting Regarding Feasibility Study 11-30-2016 Page 1 of 3 Approved by Council: 12-13-2016 analysis, and cost/benefit analysis respectively. Mr. Krueger stressed that there was no pre-ordained outcome. He went over some of the demographics of the population in the County, as well as the market hotels throughout Spokane County;for the local market conditions,he showed statistics of the triangle field organizations in Spokane County,as well as the multipurpose field organizations in the County;his map of the baseball/softball facilities in the County showed the number of youth and adult fields in each of the facilities, and mentioned the number of fields close to Spokane Valley. Mr. Krueger noted the comparable triangle facilities summary showing the facility, location, year opened, construction cost, and number of triangle fields. As part of their best practices approach to the facilities access notion, he noted the market demand analysis and the various organizations they contacted across the nation; and then went through the Market Demand Conclusions for Plante's Ferry and the HUB, as shown on page 73 of the study; said his conclusion is that thirteen fields are needed for soccer at Plante's Ferry;and the challenge is for both entities to perhaps consolidate a management plan and suggested perhaps issuing an RFP(request for proposal)for both. He noted the unmet demands of the HUB for the fields, and with the mixed age groups, said he feels eight fields are not enough and prefers twelve more; said the benefit of those additional fields means they could accommodate 100-team tournaments, but the additional fields would expand the footprint. Going back to Plante's Ferry, of those thirteen soccer fields, said that two would be turf and eleven grass and mentioned some of the advantages with using turf; he noted the estimated development cost for each with Plantes Ferry at $5,861,000 and the HUB at $27,800,000. Mr. Krueger also went over the utilization and attendance summary for each facility and again, mentioned the idea of a unified management system. He went over the financial operations including the management fee to keep the high quality of the facilities, and discussed the economic impact benefit versus the cost; said he feels both projects are feasible and suggested bidding out the RFP for management as he feels private management would be something to examine. Commissioner O'Quinn stated that Spokane Valley gets the greatest benefit of both of these entities, and that the School District is committed to the overall maintenance and operation of the HUB. Deputy Mayor Woodard said that Spokane Valley is still waiting for reports which should be included as part of their December 13 meeting. City Manager Calhoun noted that Spokane Valley has applied for and received an $80,000 grant for an in-depth study of six projects,and as noted,these will be reviewed with Council at the December 13 Council meeting. There were some general questions and comments, with City Administrator Allen asking what would be the next steps for elected officials. Commissioner O'Quinn said she will be curious to see what Spokane Valley determines, because if Spokane Valley is not part of this, then the projects are likely off the table; said all partners are needed,which prompted Councilmember Wood to ask at what level should each partner participate, and whether each partner's share would be equal. Mr. Calhoun stated that Spokane Valley talked about the additional 1.3% lodging tax which equates to about $377,000 to serve as debt for the $6 million, but if the projects are$34 million,that leaves many million unfunded and said the Spokane Valley community is wrestling with development costs. Commissioner O'Quinn said that there are several new elected officials around the table, and the issue is, we don't have enough facilities in our community; said she appreciates the consultant's report today, but that no decisions will be made today. Councilmember Wood mentioned that the issue is,how to pay for this and that Spokane Valley is struggling with things like road preservation. Mayor Peterson said one way to pay for this would be to impose an admissions tax for events; said a new revenue source is needed and his Council passed a 5%admissions tax, which is disposal income; but Councilmember Wood mentioned that a large amount of tax would be needed in order to substantially affect the multimillion dollar shortfall. Commissioner O'Quinn mentioned that an admissions tax has been talked about, but there was nothing other than discussion. City Administrator Allen recommended forming a task force after Spokane Valley hears the results of their study, to examine alternatives and look at funding options. Councilmember Pace said he feels an admissions tax would not be feasible since it would generate so little funds. fit was doted that Councihnember Collier left the meeting at 4:50 p.in.] After thanking everyone for attending today's meeting, Commissioner O'Quinn recommended this group meet again after Spokane Valley's December 13 meeting,at which time discussion could be held concerning the idea of a task force to examine funding ideas. Special Joint Meeting Regarding Feasibility Study 11-30-2016 Page 2 of 3 Approved by Council: 12-13-2016 It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard,seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. Spokane Valley's Council meeting adjourned at 4:52 p.m., after which it was moved and passed by the City of Liberty Lake to adjourn, as well as Spokane County. r If/11. Ams s L.R.Higgi 4MMfor a hristine Bainbridge, City Clerk I Special Joint Meeting Regarding Feasibility Study 11-30-2016 Page 3 of 3 Approved by Council: 12-13-2016 • 11 t,. �'� tui crc li•vl ell 1 t Spokane 4.I �° r / chl F Ss <' :lr;�q: Spokane County Valley 40 1 1Y A 5 H I W G 1 O 11 Spokane County, City of Spokane Valley & City of Liberty Lake Elected Officials Meeting AGENDA Background: Spokane County, City CenterPlace Regional Event Center, Room 109 of Spokane Valley, City of Liberty Lake, Central Valley School 2426 N. Discovery Place District, and the Spokane Sports Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Commission have worked together to procure the services of a leading November 30t", 2016 advisory firm to complete a 3:OOpm-5:0Opm Feasibility/Economic Impact Study for a potential sports complex on land located within the * Welcome & Review of Meeting Agenda. City of Liberty Lake and for Facilitator: Spokane County Commissioner potential major enhancements to Shelley 0' Quinn Spokane County's existing Plante's Ferry Sports Stadium Facility. Introductions "Conventions, Sports & Leisure International" (CSL) was selected a Feasibility/Economic Impact Study Results to complete this project. CSL is a Presentation: Bill Krueger, Principal CSL leading advisory and planning firm specializing in providing International consulting services to the convention, sport, entertainment al Question & Answer and visitor industries. CSL will be presenting an overview • Discussion / Next Steps of the study results at this meeting. comi\TR)�< • Adjournment �r,)ri' SIGN IN NOVEMBER 30, 2016 MEETING PURPOSE: Spokane County, City of Spokane Valley and City of Liberty Lake Elected Officials Meeting NAME JURISDICTION REPRESENTED 2)0 fic( Kg11-/) i Se,t7iik-044t5.5(toi, ig'cf<' 66) 4-le te/d0 44-/n/L7r- Mer ' T Coty oV 41 ;s1 -ti5 .44), 46/,13 (a k T Gm,6,1 Avu+L W Levi n s` -- 6 144/ PO/-// v 5-too+64.v9 v-,4 i_t.6''/ cOA `\ �1,9 _ 60C?„_7. oVcwt,( S 5 )OA Joo, .1) 1► 5 le.z► /-e- Zei/Y‘Prci\ --goDO )6(42„. //<-C SP 9e d cv "4/4/15 rill ir,6 ri,,,,,,,,t, _ 61,Oltiv7e y 4.ter— (,1,1/AI eA gc, ()-66( SIGN IN NOVEMBER 30, 2016 MEETING PURPOSE: Spokane County, City of Spokane Valley and City of Liberty Lake Elected Officials Meeting NAME JURISDICTION REPRESENTED Ar/A't-z-- WO-Wa-4-17 F.; ;64V-- • C11---4 6A- Te-(t/ e rh\ bio 4/y7.01-fri `Ite94,7e te-i97 Orr r`-t 1:7 Vt. ('ij r (7)1{ \-) HLIA yeat7J aitrFa__ - r L CI, _ 1 fsre "-a.vCo - 6 :4-v s, ()Q56 R9_ 60q. Lhivtd MotiNe,d(v\ (TN wwfrovvv,v, gdetki SIGN IN NOVEMBER 30, 2016 MEETING PURPOSE: Spokane County, City of Spokane Valley and City of Liberty Lake Elected Officials Meeting NAME JURISDICTION REPRESENTED /k 11 ALI/ 65V C,t/y, ,,j96. _ r ""'1 •. id, - tN;1 _ - - - ,ri ,a ===1 .6,4-_-,:n h -Pa" - :::;;;;-,-;07-n---,'; i. ' . ,:fAL T r i - .- r ��' � � �e. A � � � n •� - p ren' . a .!' --r e • _. ._ ti,,a-I _,,'' ._ .,- ...nay ! Feasibility Study for Potential New Outdoor Multi-Use : s Facilities in Spokane County, Washington , ' .. November 30, 2016 ` - _-- SPOKANE Com f - •• � , - • ,. r ,. Or f - �_« .'"" - • _ CONVENTIONS !i _ T ' i; SPORTS S ' - ' -6-. 0 . , _. 4,.,.. ..:, 4- -. Li., .1, s.. ' T it 11,r r LEISURE en).. '>i, fir: e c .. 6�.pU .,O.a ; _ ___ ___ _ Study Background & Purpose . , . :. Initial Concept # 1 : �_ '' . ...... cuz= ix, ` ' = ""' ~ Plante's Ferry Enhancement nor • Currently offer 13 soccer fields and 5 softball ' : i fields. Project would convert two existing grass 7043 % e.: soccer fields into synthetic turf fields with LED field ", L lighting and modify the 5 existing softball fields to �= 4..,1.., = a '5 include synthetic turf infield, backstop upgrades, {„�, 6 .. „ permanent home run fencing and LED field c ;; rr lighting for 2 fields, add safety netting around play _ a ro equipment as sue CO oimprovements,needsr stem enlhancements is' ' owema.ao4.�.��-- ;t irrigationY and misc. repairs) improvements.Z 0_ s-�, .` ='� - ”. 11110 ,` ` a 0 X A 3 V � awn = V) (..� Initial Concept # 2: �' �''. a . a �.2--.oil i a+An^`-wa S • 4 HUB Complex Development ~. , �.. ` �' •'-' Land acquisition for the potential development of 8 0:,-,-..-:•-:. ; _ a` + "" �? Study Components . , . PHASE 1 : PHASE 2: Market Demand Analysis Cost/Benefit Analysis • o s 1 . Existing Market Conditions 1 . Development Options 0 73 u 2. Industry Trends 2. Financial Operations (13 3. Historical Facility Usage 3. Preliminary Construction Costs z Q Z 4. Competitive Facilities 4. Economic Impacts - 4E' cc,r - 5. Comparable Benchmarking 5. Ownership/Management 46 :4 '. Ir x 6. Market Demand a 7-3 �- 1. Kick-off meeting/tours 6. Costs/Benefits 15 2. In-person interviews 7. Summary Report 0 3. Local stakeholder&user telephone interviews IL .n C�. 4. Non-local user telephone interviews lJ') (1) 8. Final Presentation ›„ cL 5. Supply vs.demand analysis 7. Market Supportable Program I.L CSL 1.1= - ' Location & Accessibility _ _ v) Driving Distance to Regional Cities an,_SILr-r Distance from Drive market O 31m City Spokane Time Population Vancouver • �. -- - _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _______ _ _ _ Coeur d'Alene, ID 24 mi. 0:28 138,494 Yakima,WA 203 mi. 2:53 247,687 Missoula, MT 197 mi. 3:03 112,684 rla 'A_,^,•,ET Seattle,WA 279 mi. 3:59 3,671,500 Helena, MT 311 mi_ 4:27 77,414 r- = Olympia, OR 320 mi_ 4:39 265,900 d 0Srallr 8p,k an Portland, OR 352 mi. 5:10 2,348,200 O © ®Seattle Salem, OR 397 mi, 5:53 404,000 V o i,.ASF1INc:1—or I Spokane Bend, OR 385 mi. 5:54 170,400 = QJ cd:, P -Missoula - Boise, ID 426 mi. 6:08 664,400 o _ Vancou'er, BC 415 mi. 6:13 603,500 - -z- 0' Eugene, OR 461 mi. 6:47 358,337 N 0 I. _ . -- r Idaho Falls, 1d 510 mi. 6:50 138,266 Z i- �' Calgary,AB 429 mi. 7:01 1,518,800 cS. Kennewick Billings, MT 540 mi. 7:22 166,885 CI) p ;:. {' Fotllan�Portlanc! > - m V 5r ` 1' F'�R?','.F — -- • . fJ:IL`.'l:Af`.,$ tri,r, . f. pBor.-.?�. t n 4--1 Q ,'. ` I-COI Falu ,I 1D.'"4 4 - j, - T 5, n V 7 - ;'r;=7 SA�ti�'� Boise . ' — z,72 kc, - .,A r, , c ! 3 A S ;f J ,I` it r CSL a � � Source:1e,11 ,r,1 - „w ce: Google Maps,Esri,2016 �" :,,t!,-:.'s � !I I r.1 I Demographics ..._/ ..., . Key Spokane County Area Metrics Spokane State of 0 Demographic Variable County 30-minute 90-minute 180-minute Washington U.S. < Population (2000) 417,939 424,703 615,302 1,237,965 5,894,121 281,421,906 - I Population (2010) 471,221 486,386 703,400 1,439,237 6,724,540 308,745,538 Population (2016 est.) 495,689 516,973 745,832 1,532,298 7,177,994 316,296,988 a % Change (2DD0 2D16) 18.6% 21.7% 21.2% 23.8% 21.8% 12.4% Z d `i c) Q Population (2021 est.) 515,637 542,424 781,451 1,607,078 7,585,878 327,981,317 Cl V % Change (2016-2021) 4.0% 4.9% 4.8% 4.9% 5.7% 3.7% ITSz CU Q = Avg. Household Inc_ (2016 est.) $ 51,621 $ 49,237 $ 50,175 $ 49,938 $ 60,959 $ 72,809 rc `h Avg. Household Inc. (2021 est.) $ 53,528 $ 51,661 $ 53,018 $ 53,205 $ 69,214 $ 83,937 '. •- \%. % Change (2016-2021) 3.7% 4.9% 5.7% 6.5% 13.5% 15.3% to p - '• Median Age (2016, in years) 37.7 37.4 39.1 37.0 38.1 37.7 ii." � Businesses (2016 est.) 22,820 25,799 35,115 64,366 315,107 24,262,035 a r, __ _ , Employees (2016 est.) 287,375 316,341 398,955 735,958 3,534,566 141,523,742 . .1Employee/Residential Population Ratio 0.58:1 0.61:1 0.53:1 0.48:1 0.49:1 0.45:1 cu r<r � V 5 '2 2J T Source:Esri,2016 . i-1.1.z1 I. I _ _ v Local Market Conditions Z Market Hotels in Spokane County ,q,.:, :r O o v = Key Hotel Rooms crrev erurr - nv 1 Mirabeau Park Hotel&Coention Center 236 —� 2 Oxford Suites Spokane Valley 128 3 Superb 180 ° p �. 4 Hampton Inn&Suites Spokane Valley 106 V fxl, ,' 5 Comfort Inn&Suites Spokane Valley 104 = .intr. r.l''d _. C vU 110m., 6 Best Western Pluss Peppertree Liberty Lake Inn 76 zlatc-ldf n 7 Quality Inn&Suites at Liberty Lake 69 Y7tc-Park Tri Intl- 0 11,arC _ Nee.man. Cl.) Q_ `�. .. e^urelr; P,a,r,� P'r o; e t Lal": 8 My Place Hotel Spokane Valley 64 V) otts . ca c �•11 e eEdurd 9 Baymont Inn&Suites Spokane Valley 61 4 •— \� ,n - Trrnwood_.- . - = V) 111 _.� }Spokane r'9 : 4— 2 __ ___ L ru, Spokane p•Maallea _ z I-Qov -- ,A ..,,,-- ,, .,.._J ,..,- , ,_ ....,,5 ,:, , 0 SpoF•ant g� .r - .. -I--, 0.. ....1 Intl .. Intl .y9 `G� C!S Cf �;9a !C Lakcr:: •> 10 o . _ _ 2. mi., -Sf'hRT` _ Cs.L., Source:Spokane Google Earth,2016111,.!•":,,i _.rRE __ _._ ___ _ _. _ v) Local Market Conditions Z Triangle Field Organizations in Spokane County Organization Sport Season of Sports Age Range Frequency of Sport Spokane Cnty Parks,Rec&Golf Dept. Rec Adult Softball Spring,Summer,and Fall 15+ 5-7 times per week Spokane Parks and Recreation Department Rec Adult Softball Spring,Summer,and Fall 18+ Once a week 5:: '.' ' L +-' Spokane Girls Fastpitch Softball Association Competitive Youth Softball Spring and Summer 10U-18U 2-3 times per week O = ZCompetitive Full TeanwAll Star Baseball,Rec 0 d Spokane Indians Youth Baseball and Softball Youth T-BalllBascball.Roc Youth Softball Spring,Summer,and Pall 9u-12u 2-4 times per week U 0 Spokane Valley Girls Softball Association Competitive Youth Softball Spring and Summer 6U-18U 2-3 times per week D N d C V Spokane Youth Sports Association Rec Youth Baseball/Softball Spring,Summer,and Fall 4U-15U 2-3 times per week as Club Spokane Dodgers Competitive Youth Baseball Year Round 16U-18U 2-4 times per week Z (� Crew Baseball Club Competitive Youth Baseball Year round 8U-19U 2-4 times per week Lu CC C Island Northwest Men's Baseball.League Competitive Adult Baseball Summer and Fall 18+ Once a week 47" .— C LI Rivervew Little League Competitive Youth Baseball Spring 5U-12U 2-3 times per week { ' +-' I. Spokane American Legion Baseball Competitive Youth Baseball Summer 12U-20U 3-4 times per week Ilp- .0 < -' Spokane Christian Athletic Association Rec Adult Softball Spring 16+ Once a week 5— co © t L Spokane Crash Softball Competitive Youth Softball Year Round 10U-18U 3-4 times per week >' .4.-; Spokane Dodgers Competitive Adult Baseball Summer and Fall 18+ Once a week .. .1 ' Spokane Lion Pride Competitive Youth Baseball Summer 18+ Once a week Cr) {CD >- CD Spokane Senior Softball League Rec Adult Softball Spring 50+ Once a week Spokane South Little League Competitive Youth Baseball Spring 4U-12U 2-3 times perweek Spokane Valley Baseball Rec Youth Baseball Spring 4U-13U 1-2 timer per week CVE:�ITIONS �. CO m Therapeutic Recreation Services Rec Youth Baseball Spring 12U-18U Once a week I �I t)�OFT a) � J Organizations currently utilizing Spokane Valley facilities andbr expressed interest in utilizing current andfor additional facilities. QS N,1R J _ _ _ ____ — . ..... 1,II Local Market Conditions .. v) z Multipurpose Field Organizations in Spokane County aOrganization Sport Season of Sports Age Range Frequency of Sport FC Spokane Competitive Youth Soccer Spring,Summer,and Fall Ll5-1,11B 2-3 times per week Inland Empire Youth Soccer Association Competitive Youth Soccer Year round(indoor training during winter) UC-U19 3-4 times per week Inland Northwest Soccer Association Rec Adult Soccer Spring,Summer,and Fell U18+ 23 times per week 2 Spokane Breakers Competitive Youth Soccer Year round(indoor training during winter) U10-Ul7 2-4 times per week © = I' Spokane Foxes FC Competitive Youth Soccer Spring and Summer U10-U19 3-4 times per week 0 O Spokane Pumas FC Competitive Youth Soccer Spring and Summer U9-U14 3-4 times per week (J Spokane SC Shadow Competitive Youth Soccer Year round(indoor training during winter) U9-U19 3-4 limes per week = (1) Spokane Scotties Competitive Youth Soccer Year round(indoor training during winter) U10-U19 2-4 times per week 0 C () Spokane Valley Junior Soccer Association Roc Soccer Spring U8-iS+ Once a week as Spokane Valor Competitive Youth Soccer Year round(indoor training during winter) U10-Ut9 24 times per week ZC Spokane Youth Sports Association Comp.Youth Soccer,Rec Youth Soccer,Rugby,Lacrosse Spring,Summer,and Fall U4-U18 23 times per week CO (21 i 1 - ` Washington East Soccer Club Competitive Youth Soccer Summer 1.18-411131.18-411132.3 times per week / Boys and Girls Club of Spokane Valley Competitive Youth Football,Rec Youth Soccer Spring,Fall U7-U12 2-3 Times per work = (A maims CltySide Lacrosse Competitive Youth Lacrosse Summer U5-U18 Summer Camp a) co -+ _ 1..0 Happy Feet Roe Youth Soccer Summer U2-U6 Once a week Lilac City Lacrosse Competitive Youth Lacrosse Summer and Fall U7-L119 3-4 times per week CL L -co Rhino Lacrosse Competitive Youth Lacrosse Summer UB-U18 Summer Camp 0 t-1- 2Spokane Junior Soccer Rec Youth Soccer Fall U4-4.116 2-3 times per week >a- Spokane Parks and Recreation Department Adult Football,Roc Youth Football,Roc Ultimate Frisbee Summer and Fall U5-1J12,18+1-2 times per week s— Z Q , Spokane Pop Warner Rec Youth Football Fall US-U14 3-4 times perwoek 4--+ a J Spokane Razorbacks Rugby Competitive Adult Rugby Summer 18+ 2-3 times per week Spokane Youth Lacrosse Roc Youth Lacrosse Spring US-US 3-4 times per wank �_ Vt Storm FC Rec Youth Soccer Year round(Indoor training during winter) U8-U19 2-4 times per week Valley Youth Soccer Roc Youth Soccer Fall US-L.117 2-3 times per week 8 4--+ C� Wolipack Competitive Adult Football Year round(indoor training during winter) 18+ 4-6 times per week -� C CINV'IiNTiC'NS YMCA Rec Youth Football Fall US-U13 3 times per week t,I'C)RT LL CL.t_ Organizations currently utilizing Spokane Valley facilities and/or expressed interest in utilizing current and/or additional facilities. QSL SI IRE. l Local Market Conditions v) z Baseball/Softball Facilities in Spokane County 0 . . — _ _ Youth HALF ?00: = Map tt of Sball/ Adult Adult Key Facility Name Fields Bball Bball Sball - c .... .. _ .- -- :,i .29?••:? -- \ to Croc lEtk:f f - - - 1 Dwight Merkel Sports Complex 6 0 0 6 '` 0 ___ _ :IT, .-... _.t c co 1 . - , 2 Franklin Park 5 5 0 0 0 _ c., 3 Plante's Ferry 5 0 0 5 'Z -4, , .- • 4 University High School 4 3 1 0 (1) 13 0 0 U - ne ilPEPNE AifE . 5 Lewis and Clark(Hart Fields) 4 2 2 0 .4....1 0 MiMe Eatrwood n'otR _. Falls = a) .. . . Coirery ,Mla(5 - ... . - 6 East Valley High School 3 2 1 0 (2) CI r- U , , Homes 7 Central Valley 3 2 1 0 CO --' . - . Ri.mmidt. State-Park . "Tov:ri sid- B Ferris High School 3 3 0 0 0-fca:0,0 . tle,rri an (I) 0 Country Propr.t. IP'd eoes,a n t • '.1 _ Pfit)fle Lake 9 Shadle Park High School 2 1 1 0 (3) — (/) Lu . Otis ' 10 Jefferson Elementary School 2 1 1 0 (4) CO = 0 atik 0 —--Oich..Ird:: - 4-7 — tir a) CI) 1111 tVritoosd-- - . - Total 37 19 7 11 C VI I - _ Miltedood '. _ - -e-o liZ CC _ --_ - .. - _ .-- . (1)Includes fields at Chester Elementary and Horizon Middle School;does -- , - ,f'-'"\„ ut.trty . 7: not include 2 non tournament quality fields 0 — , Spokane 14o.-___$:,a0m,_....-j,.. L3" - (2)Does not include 6 non-tournament quality fields without fencing Cl- •5 ..,4 - . :Spokane- ,.._ vaiiev s- co -1 Dishman .- (3)Does not include 2 non-tournament quality fields 0 U- 4.- -...., i. ,P, = (4)Does not include 4 non-tournament quality fields,2 of which are at >... .1.!:), ,_;,.......: \./ ‘. _ . . . In '— .....-,- .L (17 0 0 .--, Sacajawca Middle School = CI . Spetane y - ,•S ‘C, -. ss, Intl h Airport,put--t Lako P.rk ..- - -9,t'V' , >-• CI) - --1‹ -. ..,...1V 4-, VI ,vt't .. U 2. :::-0-. _0 I 9 -cr) .4-. 0 -- .' I'D = a Li, U, . CV,FiNT1,1,.. •,1 CC", • cst i Source:Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department,Google Earth,2016 I 1 1 Hz: RI 1 _ . - • . . Local Market Conditions v) z Multipurpose Field Facilities in Spokane County 0 p_.-..„, .....„..„....„ ,.. . _ 1 - Map No.of Full- Youth Key Facility Name Fields Sized Fields - < .r, - _ 1 Southeast Complex 14 3 11 2 PlantesFerry 13 9 4 .`•., C) _ 7,7, 3 Mead Sports Complex 13 1 12 O _ = .., , ,...., 4 Andrew Rypien 12 2 10 O 0 4....., U -- Nine Mile Falls Fairpood 6 pEo&E r--RA,szE 3 5 Dwight Merkel Sports Complex B 8 0 C) . ._ . _ contr., _ Mead 6 Farwell Elementary School 7 1 6 Ci C U _ - .i-imw,..10 CU - _ 7 University High School 6 2 4(i) - RryerAie Stat.Pork To,,,n and -CD 0 II. _ . ' c/sueity ..,, e-•:..--,r r Nemnan 8 PoloFields 5 3 2 La1,1 Z CL •7.1 _ V) ,1.:Lu CU r- - ...., Ohs chd,ar9 Central Valley 10 East Valley High School 3 3 2 3 1 0 5 ,..? ,.n 2 1 if"''''d c Ch = ...„.. .------ 11 Argonne 2 2 0 Cu a) CC - ti ,1 .,Ciberl: 1.. , ^ 121- 73 < - 0-, _ . ....--,'" - - (1)Includes fields at Chester Elementary and Horizon Middle School Spokane ,,ti r,l-irr,an Valley -:: O U- 0,.,, 1,4...2 1-93,01--- 9 - .. .1.- . . 8 •-.1' . :-. • _ >- .4_. --•...,,...„--- _ .., " -1:5 " ,4", • 0 Spokane ,45. '.-‘" .1 Intl . ..'..irport...e 'Go ,-Lt,er (/) (I) .c,'" I.; 1 Lake Pa q >-. a) ...., \ el.'\., .1 . v.) ' '(./) 4- S c,. CE5 73 ,, CAailBsjtilg'15 piF Mica 2 2 2 -1 Ti , cs.L.. Source:Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department.Google Earth.2016 _ _ _ _ _ L I V.'S!.IRE I _ _ _ _ __ _ . __ Regional Facilities _. '� Facility Location Dist.(1) Vittoria r - -Skyline Sports Complex Bond,OR 396 o , Southeast Sports Complex Spokane,WA 10 , . � Spokane Polo Club Spokane,WA 15 Everrrt u • Starfime Sports Tukwila,WA 290 C� 111 Sixty Acres Park Redmond,WA 291 Se.15�A an12 ' 7� e Northwest Soccer Park Bellingham,WA 337 3: ,';nn.rhv+^ j Washington• Premier FC Complex Puyallup,WA 302 t i-7 i.,•-n.,,t-•r Capital FC Soccer Complex Salem,OR 408 +-, ) ory���18 `y t. -O-13—��� 'crystal Lake sports Fields Corvallis,OR 445 O ` 1 1 'y ,' �— / 10 Franklin Park Complex Spokane,WA 12 C) �+ rima 11 Dwight Merkel Sports Complex Spokane.WA 15 -4—, 1:5V ^ if- -- l b 12 Canfield Sports Complex Coeur d'Alene,ID 26 tarn mn rtri • 13 Pad Laurier Memorial Athletic Park Moses Lake,WA 115 °' 19A^'"I� CB aaa 14 Pasco Sporting Complex Pasco,WA 148 J -�,. - 1�V 15 Southridge Sports Complex Kennewick,WA 151 24 • !~' 16 Perry Sports Complex Yakima,WA 218 Z f " 23 2Jr "'"r`---, U 17 Petrovitsky Park Renton,WA 281 CZ c ��/ 2621�orama� - 18 Heritage Recreation Center Puyallup,WA 303 19 Regional Athletic Complex Lacey,WA 322 CD , i �~Z2 20 Ravensdale Park Ravensdale,WA 276 L� 21 Harmony Sports Complex Vancouver,WA 354 O °� 3f n - - ,:a9:71n. 22 Hood View Sports Complex Happy Valley,OR 359 CI— U Fn�r. `� 23 Owens Sports Complex Portland,OR 360 L _. \ Q LL _ ... _ 24 Luke Jensen Sports Park Vancouver,WA 366 ntvwrm I Nnts y ,l,,a,.r25 Howard M.Terpenning Rec.Complex Beaverton,OR 371 ,msi _ rine°,,,"`; }\ 26 Gordon Faber Rec.Complex Hillsboro,OR 375 n 0 — knew. _ �'lend ` 27 Settlers Park Meridian,ID 376 +J Q ._ _. 30orn jon �4utn,_ _ 2g Simplot Sports Complex Boise,ID 386 r .r27.2g'`"se 29 Pine Nursery Park Bend,OR 392 .4—n• Ct.) _ 30 Big Sky Park Bend,OR 393 \ 31 Wallace Marine Park Softball Complex Salem,OR 407 -0 ° y f_ T 32 U.S.Cellular Park Medford,OR 569 a- Com lex c,n�'I::rl��vs 2 �=Triangle P SPORTS LL - Tnrrn,,: 'Y;. =Rectangle Complex C (1)DiStarCemmtesfrom SpokaneValley—? ,y ` W _ s 1 . AL . ; _ "si, =Multi-Sport Complex I I.l_l tIrl , •_ --- - RegioaI Facilities CI) 31 a 4R a4sNdGO V a m a .2 _ m N m co C m un Facility Location Dist.(1) . ii l. > O ti ii Q d Y O Q - Skyline Sports Complex Bend,OR 396 Out 0 - - - 4 - 4 - -_ Southeast Southeast Sports Complex Spokane,WA 10 Out 14 3 11 - 0 (2) Spokane Polo Club Spokane,WA 15 Out 5 3 2 - 0 (t)Dot-ince in filler.from Spokone Veit,' �+ Starfire Sports Tukwila,WA 290 In/Out 12 9 3 - 0 (3) (2)Coos nor include 3 nce4ournarrent gualiry softball fields. 11..7.1 -C V) - Sixty Acres Park Redmond,WA 291 Out 25 16 9 - 0 (3)Outdoor stadium Ms 4,000 sealing capacity,does rot Include 2lntlotu fields -4 : Northwest Soccer Park Bellingham,WA 337 Out 28 3 25 - 0 (4) (4)Does nal Include 4non-tournament quaky softball 1hies (a)Includes 3 non-rouraerMrn quaGly baseball fields Washington Premier FC Complex Puyallup,WA 302 Out 11 8 3 0 (6)BMX Track Capital FC Soccer Complex Salem,OR 408 Out 10 6 4 - 0 (7)ndoor Sport Pavillon used for Indoorsport (88))Sof tbal field#2 converts into al uWsce softer field 0 Crystal Lake Sports Fields Corvallis,OR 445 Out 9 9 0 - 6 - - - 5 5 (5) (g)ea,ebatfleldconvert intoafuo-scosoccer field f>3 10 Franklin Park Complex Spokane,WA 12 Out 3 2 1 5 5 (10)Coes not Include await center.IS tenni;Courts,10 basketball eourte, 2 nab perks.and a raker hockey rink 11 Dwight Merkel Sports Complex Spokane.WA 15 Out 8 8 - 6 6 - {6} C) ® (11)aasabaII fold In converts into n fuA-atm soccer field 12 Canfield Sports Complex Coeur d'Alene,ID 26 Out 4 2 2 - 6 1 - 1 4 - Q (92)Does not Include 7 non-Youm,moot quality fetch Cn /� 13 Paul Lauzier Memorial Athletic Park Moses Lake,WA 115 Out 3 - 2 1 5 2 3 - - - (13)Includes 16-court piddeball complex CSS c 14 Pasco Sporting Complex Pasco,WA 148 Out 34 11 23 - 6 - 6 - - - (14)3t5(Track softball field hconvert.into soccer field 47; 15 Southridge Sports Complex Kennewick,WA 151 WOut 2 2 - - 4 - 4 - - - (7) C VI (1) 16 Perry Sports Complex Yakima,WA 218 Out 4 3 1 - 0 d ;..+ 17 Petravitsky Park Renton.WA 281 Out 2 2 - - 4 - 1 3 - - CL. 18 Heritage Recreation Center Puyallup,WA 303 Out 6 4 2 - 5 1 3 1 =Triangle Complex 19 Regional Athletic Complex Lacey,WA 322 Out 6 6 - - 5 1 - 4 - - O LL < 20 Ravensdale Park Ravensdale,WA 278 Out 5 5 - - 6 2 - 3 1 - =Rectangle Complex �+ 21 Harmony Sports Complex Vancouver,WA 354 Out 9 7 2 - 7 1 - 3 3 - • 1 =Multi-Sport Complex - L Z 22 Hood View Sports Complex Happy Valley,OR 359 Out 1 1 - - 4 - 4 - - - (8) a=-+ 0 23 Owens Sports Complex Portland,OR 360 Out 9 7 2 - 7 - 5 2 - (!� 24 Luke Jensen Sports Park Vancouver,WA 366 Out 2 1 1 3 1 2 (9) 25 Howard M.Terpenning Rec.Complex Beaverton.OR 371 In/Out 5 5 7 2 1 4 (10) 4--+ VI 26 Gordon Faber Rec.Complex Hillsboro,OR 375 Out 1 1 - - 8 2 5 1 - - (11) 27 Settlers Park Meridian,ID 376 Out 6 2 1 3 8 2 - 3 3 - ;-0 I 28 Simplot Sports Complex Boise,ID 386 Out 35 10 25 - 8 2 - 2 4 - (12) 12 cn W - - - 29 Pine Nursery Park Bend,OR 392 Out 20 4 16 4 4 (13) ICSiCRTcluNS = /1/ 30 Big Sky Park Bend,OR 393 Out 5 2 2 1 2 1 - 1 - - (14) TM U— G {� 31 Wallace Marina Park Softball Complex Salem,OR 467 Out 2 2 - - 5 - 5 - - - 32 U.S.Cellular Park Medford,OR 569 Out 6 6 - - 9 2 5 2 - - E I.FEZ( RG I _ _ _____ . _ Comparable Triangle Facilities ._ Triangle Facilities Summary VNo. of - LLI Year Const. Cost Triangle Facility Location Opened (in millions) Fields — a 8- a _1 Grand Park Westfield, IN 2014 $49.0 26 _ v,,, u '' Legacy Park Lee's Summit, MO 1997 N/A 24 a 1 < Mid America Sports Complex Shawnee Mission, KS 1994 $3.9 24 Z. v, Elizabethtown Sports Park Elizabethtown, KY 2012 $29.0 13 7s = w .7. 7 Chappapeela Sports Park Hammond, LA 2013 $17.0 12 o ' m Rocky Mount Sports Complex Rocky Mount, NC 2006 $12.0 11 • . o 2 U.S. Cellular Community Park Medford, OR 2008 $32.5 10 -0 " < Ballfields at Craig Ranch McKinney, TX 2005 $25.0 10 o in• v-} Grand Park Athletic Complex Myrtle Beach, SC 2010 $22.0 9 Z7 ci) — D `�' Art Van Sports Complex Rockford, MI 2014 $7.0 9 13 • 747A Simplot Sports Complex Boise, ID 1995 N/A 8 VW' '12 -- C ' , LEI UR __ _ __. _ _____ ._ . _ Comparable Rectangle Facilities Rectangle Facilities Summary No. of W Year Const. Cost Rectangle. a Facility Location Opened (in millions) Fields o S Grand Park Westfield, IN 2014 $49.0 31 0 0 v i Chappapeela Sports Park Hammond, LA 2013 $17.0 27 C7 = 11) U, MD SoccerPlex/Discovery Sports Ctr. Boyds, MD 2000 $22.1 24 ililL cu 11_ Simplot Sports Complex Boise, ID 1995 N/A 20 a c LU Mike Rose Soccer Complex Memphis, TN 1998 $13.0 16 c Elizabethtown Sports Park Elizabethtown, KY 2012 $29.0 12 0 = m Legacy Park Lee's Summit, MO 1997 N/A 12 o Overland Park Soccer Complex Overland Park, KS 2009 $36.0 12 0 ® - t James W. Cownie Soccer Park Des Moines, IA 1998 $5.5 12 Rocky Mount Sports Complex Rocky Mount, NC 2006 $12.0 8 D • Heritage Recreation Center Puyallup, WA N/A N/A 6 Lh,CIS 2 U ; — — _____ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ ___ _ . _ .. Market Demand Analysis ( ) Organizations Contacted Ll 2D16 Skagit Firecracker Kick in the Grass Spokane Sports Commission 3d Lacrosse National Lacrosse America Spokane Volley Basball 6 A Side Lilac City Lacrosse Spokane Valley Girls Softball Association AAU Baseball National Championships Little League Baseball Western Region Spokane Valley Junior Soccer Association f AAU Football-National Office Little League International Baseball and Softball Spokane Valley Pop Warner r Academy of Idaho National Beep Baseball Association Spokane Valor `-- Aloha United Soccer Club National Soccer Coaches Association Spokane Youth Lacrosse American Youth Soccer Organization NCAA Men's&Women's Lacrosse Championship Spokane Youth Sports Association .t--+ • ASA Softball-Oregon NDP Lacrosse Starfire Tournaments L C Awestruck Lacrosse NIRSA National Flag Football Championships Storm FC a = ' Battle of Bothell Tournament Northwest Cup Super Series Baseball of America 0 Boys and Girls Club of Spokane Valley Northwest Nations The Sports Forum -4:5 d-+ U CABA World Series Pacific Northwest Babe Ruth League Theraputic Recreation SenJces = Co fug Cal Ripkon Baseball Youth Baseball PSPL Surf Academy Tournament Services Inc. O C Cascade Cup Puget Sound Premier League Trawl Ball Select Cascades Collegiate Conference Pullman Soccer Club Tr-City Soccer 3CDA Sting Rhino Lacrosse Triple Crown Baseball CO 0 < Champion U.S.Teams Lacrosse Event Rheniew Little League Triple Crown Baseball World Series Z Q CitySide Lacrosse Schwan's USA Cup U.S.Lacrosse _ Cn Club Spokane Dodgers Seattle Cup and Celebrate Shoreline Soccer Classic U.S.Premier Baseball Championships Iu C . Cor Van Der Meer Memorial Soccer by Design U.S.Soccer(U.S.Team events) :ha •� - Cowlitz Kickoff Classic Spokane American Legion Baseball U.S.Soccer Development Academy C V) I, Crew Baseball Club Spokane Breakers U.S.Youth Soccer-Western Region N _� I L.. Directors Mortgage Summer Slam Spokane Christian Athletic Assolcation United States Flag&Touch Football League 4"-' a--+ Dixie Youth Majors World Series Spokane Crash Softball US Club Soccer-National a. -,3Dungeness Cup Spokane Dodgers US Club Soccer-Western Region _ Eastside FC Cup Spokane Dodgers and Club Spokane Dodgers USA Field Hockey Elite Player Development(EPD) Spokane Foxes FC USA Football U- Elite Tournaments-Lacrosse/Soccer Spokane Foxes FC and Spokane Pumas FC USA Football-Youth Regional Manager FC Spokane Spokane Girls Fastpitch Softball Association USA Rugby -3 . WFC Spokane Spokane Indians Youth Baseball and Softball USA Ultimate = I) Federal Way FC BIast Off Spokane Junior Soccer USAPB Firecracker Classic-Baseball +4 0. Future Star Baseball Tournaments Spokane Junior Soccer and Valley Youth Soccer OSSA V) („Ii rGame Day USA Spokane Lion Pride USSSA-Baseball ›- (1) .. U GameBreaker Lax/Rugby/Field Hockey Camps Spokane Parks and Recreation Department USSSA-Baseball National '_ V) Happy Feet Spokane Pop Warner USSSA Fast Pitch ""- . Harmony 3V3 Soccer Challenge Spokane Pumas FC USSSA Softball-National - rIdaho Thunder Spokane Razorbacks Rugby Valley Youth Soccer V) -1 IFHCK Field Hockey Spokane SC Shadow Washington East Soccer Club IIC:r�\\i:VTti)V� ['6 GG.....�� Inland Empire Youth Soccer Assoicatlon Spokane Scotties Washington Youth Soccer i SPORTS( (1..) Inland Northwest Men's Baseball League Spokane Senior Softball League Wolfpack CS LL Inland Northwest Soccer Association Spokane Soccer Academy YMCA Island Cup Spokane Sounders Academy Youth Baseball Nationals ( LIaSl IRE Market Demand Conclusions v.) ! _ —v Plante's Ferry (soccer/multisport + softball) HUB Complex (softball + baseball) . 1. Existing Conditions: 1. Demand: Moderate to high demand levels noted -41— a) Condition and quality of fields are limiting the among local and non-local softball and baseball > marketability and available use hours. leagues, clubs and tournament producers. L b) Physical improvements are required to elevate to O <-- 2. Supply& Demand Issues: Minimum of 8 fields is CI 0 '41 ..- industry standard conditions. required to meet existing demand; however, 12 fields U c) Quality is also hindered by limited County funding are believed to be needed to address long term ac support to maintain soccer fields. growth. cis .. d) For an all natural-surface complex of its type and Z Qcondition,the soccer fields are highly utilized. 3. HUB Site: Original HUB site plan envisioned 35-acre A site for 8 fields. Based on industrystandards e) Certain organizations/clubs desire to have greater (includingparking, circulation, support facilities, etc.), access to the complex_ p g, pp rts c 2 . c tril between 4.0-6.0 acres per triangle field is appropriate a) N2. Soccer Field Demand: Number of fields is estimated to p +' w be sufficient to accommodate current and potential for planning purposes. A 12 field complex would 0.. •v Q suggest a 48-to 72-acre site. Industry standards for new local demand at current rectangle fields, assuming 0 the conversion of 2 fields to synthetic turf plus lights, modern complexes of this nature are 75 parking a Z which will importantly expand use hours. spaces per field. tD c0- 3. Softball Field Demand: Added capacity exists to 4. Alternative Site: If the HUB site cannot be expanded accommodate incremental demand at softball fields; to at least 48 contiguous acres, consideration of +�, v CC however, configuration and quality of fields limits alternative sites for a larger complex and/or future appeal to local clubs and non-local organizations.ri:5 =5 2 , growth should be considered. 16 .7 Synthetic turf infields and and LED lights for 2 fields IcONVui (2NN5 will expand usable hours& reduce maintenance costs. _ , -._ I1,N113.1- I Market Indicated Program ....., Plante's Ferry (soccer/multisport 4- softball) .. • Soccer/Multisport Fields __ . Q 2 • Existing 13 fields at Plante's Ferry (plus other � ' _ � eA'` a local field supply) expected to be sufficient to `-• _ accommodate existing and future local/ + .' �-r_� °r x , _. L c 0 non-local demand. _- C = o O Conversion of two fields to synthetic turf with /�r Q U co w lighting would importantly expand utilization, j s O availability, and marketability. ' _le a CU o • Contemplated strategy of regrade, irrigation & I`_. ` '¢ _� � : IPz s� equipment improvements is appropriate. .. " ' ".- Rich A., res • Softball Fields ._ , °. _ 1 C r I of 5 fields is appropriate. � AJ( SuPP Y � , ti ? . --, o VV • Conversion of infield dirt to turf on all 5 fields y ( t� •-,, and addition of lights on 2 fields would reduce maintenance costs and significantly increase { t4— in < . . available use hours. 0 +Q 5� ``ohona a�� -0 • -4-•. Q i' ° RECOMMENDATION: cr n -(1) t n -i. - > (5 • Original concept ,,' .- cum4--,--, - V7 s S;O K N E,` _.L L`€rY s- ? • 13 soccer fields (2 turf, 11 grass) _ e- _ ,4�; �. _ ': . _ • 5 softball fields (all infield turf) fc:onvr_ninuN's 2 Q_ • Lighting & other improvements as planned c __ 1 Market Indicated Program ., , _ _ __. _ , , _ ..... _____A HUB Complex (softball ÷ baseball) W — - ffi jl • 4 full synthetic turf baseball < fields = 4f , ��_ • utilizing a wheel configurationwith _._-• -'�. - m,,,,,, gm portable mounds and adjustable base lengths (including 60',65', 7o �0 -=t o = ' 70',80'and 90'bases)and fences o "� 0 IF] U w up to 320'with portable fencing. \ r "------,_-.4,,,;H 'H 0 , 8 fullsynthetic turf l • softball/youth baseball fields — — - -a " 9 ' •-•-•-••&17--- ' 1--- � ,-,N",:'''! co 0 z Q. C • utilizing dual wheel configuration _ _ ,, 0 \� rti „, with portable mounds andi `� q —�, �. ��:--�,, -- �z .-�, , .—CU c adjustable base lengths(including ' m - � • , 60',65',70'and 80'bases)and T,� �o�.eav0.urr�pwwow.,,,., '°" • U...,aw• ! is.Sas^Spas.Pie. ...a„�.•,rr.d mw .•4 - nrkm ;n.wo, oan.b Ca raw R >.s.ra. s_s.-xa }, portable fencing allowing for = ,�.,—•...,.;e_..,,a.,�a = configurations of 200'to 300'. . _ e - ,c)5.....„..............—' w, ,a p 11 I '� �;> • Other: 0 ,..,•.,, .�,_p """°"°" REGIONALSPORTS COMPLEX ••, �raofs E 0ill<C 1- • uLitgilhiztantgofnorpearlliofidesld.s to maximize E Nn • Restroom and concession facilities. • RECOMMENDATION: cr) •v-r, - >-, co (0,4D • Pavilion&field operations building. • 12 fields (larger concept than originally envisioned is indicated •— D • Warm-up areas. to optimally accommodate local and nonlocal unmet demand) -� signage.Park entrance si • g g 4 full size flexible baseball fields m • Paved parking lot, parking capacity • 8 softball/youth baseball fields f ,i'.'i r;i for min.of 75 spaces per field. • All fields full synthetic turf& scalable CS-L, cu CI— SSL .:.. alb. Vim. — -. . . _ __ _____. _ ._. . _ • Estimated Development Costs , ,. .. . ......,L , . . . , . 's Ferry Project HUB Complex Project • Estimated costs for Plante's Ferry Description Unit Quantity Unit Pow Cost dPlaying Surfaces i °' improvement project provided by County. Softball 6. • Synthetic Turf Fields EA 12 $ 600,000 $ 7,200,000 ' 5...... • Description: Plante's Ferry park was initially Natural Grass Fields EA 0 $ - $ - S— e— 0 Total Softball Cost 5 7,200,000 . p -= developed in 1952 and was expanded to Q a J include the sports stadium (13 soccer fields Al Total Playing Surface Cost S 7,200,008 .. 7V W and 5 softball fields) from 1997-2002 through IB)Site Buildings 1 Site Maintenance Bldg. SF 1,500 $ 100 $ 150,000 Q a partnership with the Spokane Valley Junior Tournament Headquarters SF 2,500 $ 175 $ 440,000 LUcu 0 Soccer Association. Conceptually,this project Concessions/Restroom SF 3,000 $ 200 $ 600,000 would convert 2 existing grass soccer fields C)Total Building Costs IA+B) 5 3,390,000 into synthetic turf fields with LED field CTS r 0)Other Construction Costs I lighting, modify the 5 existing softball fields Fixed Equipment 2%of Building Costs 2% $ 170,000 = in General Site=rk 5%of Building Costs 5% $ 420,000 a) _ to include synthetic turf infield, backstop Landscape 2%of Building Costs 2% $ 170,000 p .= 2.a— upgrades, permanent home run fencing and Parking Per Space 900 $ 1,250 $ 1,130,000 Imo' %� LED field lighting for 2 fields, add safetySidewalksSF 75,000 $ s $ 330,000 L � g g Lighting EA 12 $ 185,000 $ 2,220,000 o LL netting around play equipment as needed, Fencing 2%afBuilding Costs 2% $ 170,000 pursue parking improvements, irrigation Community Features 2%of Building Costs 2% 5 170,000 -'0• s_ E)Total Construction Costs IC+0) $ 13,220,000 p 1..N C system enhancements and misc. repairs/ i"' g- improvements. Replacement of existing IF)Other ProjectCosts EJ'1 V) Soft Costs 20"f of Construction Costs 20% 5 2,640,000 >- 'CV dilapidated restroom. General Planning Contingency 10%of Construction Costs 10% $ 1,320,000 t/1 Site Acquisition Client Provided $ 10,700,000 • Total Estimated Project Cost: $5,861,000 - Total Estimated Project Costs(E+F) $ 27,330,000 i ig C6 :3 Note: Hypothetical order-of-magnitude estimates.Detailed architectural concept, lc ONS iciSPE?RTS L�L design and costing analysis would be required to specifically estimate construction 4 costs. ____ _ _ ______ _ _ _ Utilization & Attendance Summary Plante's Ferry Spokane County Sports Complex - Plante's Ferry LinZ:1 i > Initial StabilizedQ" g Existing Year Year 73 U Complex 1 2 3 4 Cy Total Attendance: Q r Leagues 108,000 135,000 140,400 145,800 145,800 a �O Practices 212,625 265,781 276,413 287,044 287,044 z CZ Camps 7,500 11,700 14,700 18,000 20,250 co c In-House Tournaments 39,750 49,125 49,125 49,125 49,125 Third-Party Tournaments 37,500 73,875 83,250 83,250 83,250 0) (1 ' W TOTAL ATI-EN DANCE 405,375 535,481 563,888 583,219 585,469 , co Z — 0 LL. Tournaments: W In-House Tournaments 8 9 9 9 9 -0 O CO Third-Party Tournaments 4 9 10 10 10 cl (1) `� Total 12 18 19 19 19 .sem, V( � J a-+ 20 c.o,o i�u-noN, n1 '�,ToRTs0 U CSLNote:Includes participants and spectators. LL[SUl _ _.____ _ _ Utilization & Attendance Summary New HUB Field Complex $ Q V Spokane County Sports Complex - HUB Field Complex a E' : Initial Stabilized 0 = Year Year O U 1 2 3 4 5 = Co z Total Attendance: C nuLeagues 58,500 70,200 81,900 81,900 81,900 Practices 43,875 52,650 61,425 61,425 61,425 z Camps 3,750 6,300 8,400 9,600 10,800 In-House Tournaments 8,250 31,875 41,250 41,250 41,250 its c +� •— — Third-Party Tournaments 61,500 84,950 117,775 117,775 117,775 r N _ li- p ' Li_i TOTAL ATTENDANCE 175,875 245,975 310,750 311,950 313,150 p ti Tournaments: } W In-House Tournaments 2 6 7 7 7 -0 Third-Party Tournaments 12 17 23 23 23 V) Q Total 14 23 30 30 30 } 3 ro -5 Q 21 rrs � I sr�u.r<r 1 2 U Note:Includes participants and spectators: ` ' 391`-.41014e•' _____ Estimated Financial Operations Plante's Ferry (Estimated Improved/Redeveloped) Stabilized Year Year 1 2 3 4 < ti) Operating Revenues League,Practice and Camp Rentals $841,969 $877,088 $912,206 $912,206 Tournament Rental Income $33,000 $37,000 $37,000 $37,000 L ii In-House Tournament Registration Fees $207,200 $207,200 $207,200 $207,200 0 g _ ' Sponsorship $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 O Q " Concessions(Net) $184,466 $195,278 $206,570 $213,484 L3 Other Revenue $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Total Operating Revenues $1,366,635 $1,416,565 $1,462,977 $1,469,890 CJ. : _ Operating Expenses tU Q Salaries Si.Wages $517,803 $528,159 $538,722 $538,722 _ U') 1 I. Tournament Expenses $82,880 $82,880 $82,880 $82,880 RS • Utilities $290,000 $290,000 $290,000 $290,000 • N Repairs&Maintenance $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 $240,000 Q u� Materials and Supplies $123,750 $123,750 $123,750 $123,750 I 0Ill Insurance $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 I d' co General&Administrative $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 p !- Other Miscellaneous $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 W Management Fee $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 "0 © Total Operating Expenses $1,599,433 $1,609,789 $1,620,352 $1,620,352 c! Lo '� Operating Income/(Loss) ($232,798) ($193,224) ($157,376) ($1S0,462) N Co Other Expenses Replacement Reserve $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 $130,000 0 Total Net Income/(Loss) ($362,798) ($323,224) ($287,376) ($280,462) CCtNVEtdTtl�NS res / sra i tl 2 U ' Note:Figures presented in 2011 dollars. Does not include debt service associated with development costs.A replacement reserve has been assumed to account for replacement of the synthetic turf(every 15 years)and other major capital improvements that would be expected. Costs for these replacement have been amortized over a 15-year period. I LL•-IRIJIsE ___ ____ - - ___ _ _ _ . _ __ . _ . _ Estimated Financial Operations HUB Complex (Estimated New) Stabilized Year Year 1 2 3 4 5 (, it) Operating Revenues League,Practice and Camp Rentals $393,750 $477,500 $556,250 $556,250 $556,250 (1) Tournament Rental Income $60,000 $85,000 $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 In-House Tournament Registration Fees $50,400 $209,200 $279,200 $279,200 $279,200 LO �� Sponsorship $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 Concessions(Net) $75,150 $110,595 $142,980 $147,640 $152,451 oc:( ( 1 Other Revenue $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $80,000 $50,000 Cl) Total Operating Revenues $754,300 $1,057,295 $1,268,430 $1,273,090 $1,277,901 C Operating Expenses CU p -® Salaries&Wages $407,550 $419,777 $432,370 $445,341 $458,701 Z fig" Tournament Expenses $20,160 $83,680 $111,680 $111,680 $111,680 R5 C Utilities $96,000 $98,880 $101,846 $104,902 $104,902 ' Repairs&Maintenance $86,400 $86,400 $86,400 $86,400 $86,400 at C.-) V- Materials and Supplies $99,000 $99,000 $99,000 $99,000 $99,000 4-' d=' W Insurance $48,000 $48,000 $48,000 $48,000 $48,000 0- 'U z General&Administrative $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 S.- Other Miscellaneous $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 O LI- "" cn Management Fee $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 i rJ o Total Operating Expenses $1,017,110 $1,095,737 $1,139,296 $1,155,323 $1,168,683 • 4 Operating Income/(Loss) ($262,810) ($38,442) $129,134 $117,768 $109,218 4-, 0 F( " Other Expenses = ) r Replacement Reserve $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 $260,000 N Total Net Income/(Loss) ($522,810) ($298,442) ($142,232) ($150782 ($130,866) , ) t:tl'C RTn�` s CijU � �I'C�RTS(r C L Dote:Figures presented in 2016 dollars, Does not include debt service associated with development costs.A replacement reserve has been assumed to account for replacement of CS Aft the synthetic turf(every 15 years)and other major capital improvements that would be expected. Costs for these replacement have been amortized over a 15-year period. l l.ElSt!RFI _ _ _ Estimated Economic Impacts Plante's Ferry (Estimated Existing and Improved/Redeveloped) initial Stabilized Estimated Distribution r Existing Year Year Spotene ubcrty- Other �/ Complex 1 2 3 4 v,ney Lake ie-County +�_ Total Attendee Days 405,375 535,481 563,888 583,219 585,469 L C= �'^ Total Non-Local Visitor Days 42,375 67,350 73,538 75,188 76,313 ° 0 o Total Hotel Room Nights 8,625 13,704 15,002 15,398 15,668 70% 10% 20% 0) Direct Spending by Type O C 20% Hotel $1,334,813 $2,121,525 $2,316,431 $2,368,406 $2,403,844 70% 10% RestaurantMeals 1,048,781 1,666,913 1,820,053 1,860,891 1,888,734 85% 10% 5% fl] Entertainment/Leisure 254,250 404,100 441,225 451,125 457,875 50% 10% 40% F Retail/Shopping 349,594 555,638 606,684 620,297 629,578 70% 15% 15% C= Other 190,688 303,075 330,919 338,344 343,406 70% 15% 15% C N Total $3,178,125 $5,051,250 $5,515,313 $5,639,063 $5,723,438 73% 11% 16% N t _ � LI I 4,.. .(7.) z i, U. 1 f i Total Economic Output $5,148,563 $8,183,025 $8,934,806 $9,135,281 $9,271,969 70% 10% 20% A � L Personal Earnings $2,574,281 $4,091,513 $4,467,403 $4,567,641 $4,635,984 70% 10% 20% O Q c› Employment 66 105 115 118 119 70% 10% 20% (fu11&part-time Jobs) 24 itsi 0 = `�, 0 r 1 2 Note:Figures presented in 2016 dollars. Only reflects spending by estimated visitors who are not local residents.214"VetekilVile--4relltVklISYS..‘ - - ' ' -- ' . - . . {cJSE f � E c rziz _. . _ Estimated Economic Impacts , New HUB Field Complex Initial Stabilized Estimated Distribution (f) Year Year Spokane Liberty Other rV�J 1 2 3 4 5 V licy Lake In County V 1 > Total Attendee Days 175,875 245,975 310,750 311,950 313,150 a Total Non-Local Visitor Days 36,750 61,563 83,713 84,313 84,913 O Total Hotel Room Nights 7,425 12,439 16,911 17,055 17,199 65% 15% 20% © 0) Direct Spending by Type r6 Hotel $1,157,625 $1,939,219 $2,636,944 $2,655,844 52,674,744 65% 15% 20% RestaurantMeals 909,563 1,523,672 2,071,884 2,086,734 2,101,584 65% 25% 10% z Q. Entertainment/Leisure 220,500 369,375 502,275 505,875 509,475 45% 20% 35% Retail/Shopping 303,188 507,891 690,628 695,578 700,528 60% 25% 15% }; -- Other 165,375 277,031 376,706 379,406 382,106 60% 25% 15% C (41 LL Total $2,756,250 $4,617,188 $6,278,438 $6,323,438 $6,368,438 63% 20% 17% pa Q) • = Indirect/Induced Spending $1,708,875 $2,862,656 $3,892,631 $3,920,531 $3,948,431 65% 15% 20% O v) W Total Economic Output $4,465,125 $7,479,844 $10,171,069 $10,243,969 $10,316,869 65% 15% 20% © CO` Personal Earnings $2,232,563 $3,739,922 $5,085,534 $5,121,984 $5,158,434 65% 15% 20% D i • C.) Employment 58 96 131 132 133 65% 15% 20% a-- D Cr) 1 (full&part-timejobs) el .7 -4 ' 0 Ci \'l-E:\T111N Ci. 2 U Note: Figures presented in 2016 dollars. Only reflects spending by estimated visitors who are not local residents. S I I.E.SSi R