Mamer N 1628 Office Bldg A of Phase #1 -ti r,r g
~
DATE FMM ~GIl~T~+ lt'S R~YIEW S~IEE'I
x
5 - 2-3 M,rLAO
e,xcem
~
PERMff # B95147 -m
Related Fde # (Z~084-81/ZE-039-
Dwe to Revi6w 10/4145 Time 1000 tt~~ew Type Pre-Applicadon
Dme Rewived 1O/2$/95
Project Name IGTLAND OFFICE Pg OFFiCE BLDG A PHASE #1 BMG sQ Fr
Range -1`own*p - Swtion
4axo4 qW
SITE ADDRESS AWM Iq 1628 / N MISSION/W' EVFRG►REEN PARCEY.
Agphc,ant s Name MM HAIIM Phone # 838-7447
Addross ]Phone 3#
FLOOD ZONB NO
Acgt+eement ta pay fees Oamer's/addrm/phpae INLAND CONST
201 E SPRAGUE
?4?-5162
Bmldsn,g Colnt= Person Jeff Forry Ext 143 / JU,LdTE SFUTTO Mone # 45&3675
Date SWMMd pescnpan F~uaals
I ~ • ~
/ / AGitEE1VIENT T0 PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETFD & COPY TO A.CCOCf.NTING
NOTICE TO PvBUC # 13 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED
! ! DBSIGN DEVIATION' SUBIMITTEDIDATE GOMPLETED -MA1LfiD
BOND AMOUNT REC71EVED $
- 4
BOND RELEASED - ROAD & .DRAINAGE xMPROVBME1rTTS
/ I^ STAMPED MY'LARS TO PERMI'T TECHNiCAN (S'YL/SUZANNE)
APP-ROACH PERWT # ROAU/S WIDTH/S
1t3 ~S /l9T~ ~ Aesp.-ftA~i
Ifoo".-Of _ego -~.,.~~13~.v~ f ~e~~ .~a.~~ 7~5~.►~f,_
'1 ~T~'f~'/C.. ~ 1l~S ~,S _ ✓~.~„_f ~~"~°2. ms!'~ gG F'~4.IJS ~ p.~
4'3 ~ AA...b to ;:g6- A-~ est/es-
17
A, ,~[,~i~J ~~~~'~c c= ?
. ~ ~ -31 jVd'
~itJ~~_~~ -s Z~ AAML -
- r - t
.~~.,~8+ ~.~r
„_.~p • <a ~ ~.~,1~~ ~r~ _
~
ENGTNEElt'S REVIM S~EET
-
Date $ubmitted Descnphon Ixuhals
IAv.
~ ~t~
~
~
:~to
im&-D no
~
7. I . ~~s ~ ~.•a.~.~o~.
~~C.~[.db~ ~i~es~' ~•~t~ ~
~ r t ,
~ t ~A~"►~' .
Ar• 16oA*
+1 0,.bgODr
,
A %%_)vwt''s,-44P
Co
,
eom•,✓O ,'r).AOJOP 00 )LOAlows tt-r 9164%as,
goot, M96AMW
7- Zagw c2r V - Ao4oAgE!4
4
L6424S
k*~*ev,iew for
/ N 01^01
PAQJBCT N NRs 9600391.*.. APPLIGATION ~ DATSs-, 16/03/96 PAGSa 01 '
~
TSIS IS NOT A EERMIT
PBNALTIES WILL 8S A83ESSED FOR CONHEAICING WORR WZTSOIIT A PERMIT 9
1
i
S= STREFT= 1618 N MAMER RD PARCEL,_ 45104.0210
ADDFESS= SPOKANB WA 99216
PERMZT IISE= WARLHOt13S BLD. A/ INLAND CONST. / PAC / OCT 4, 1995
PLA►r#= 002754 PLAT NAME= VERA
BLOCK- LOT= ZONSa I-2 DIST#= S
ARLA= 00000000 F/A= F WIDTH= DLPTH= R/W= 40
# OF BLDGS= 1 # DWSLLINGS= WATSR DIST = VERA
OWNSRa INLAND CONST CO PHONB= 509 747 5162
STREET= 102 E SPRAG08 AV8
ADDRESS= SPORANE WA 99202
CANTACT NAME= HOH TOWNSBND PHONE NOMHLR= 509 747 5162
BIIILDIPIG SSTBACRS FRONT= 600 LEFTa 25 RIGHT= 60 REAR= 20
*~~~~****~*~*~**~**~*~~~*w*~** REVIEW ZNFORMATION *,r~~*~,r******~*~****~*~***~**
.
DBPARTMBNT REVIFW REQOIREMENT
BIIILDINa RFVIEW COORDINATOR - J LARSON
,
CQIrIIKENT3 t
~
~
BQILDn►1G PLAN RRVZTW REQIIIRBD
00241ENTS s
0
~
BII2LDING SONING/SSTS RBVISW '
~
+ ~ f
c'o~xrs~ ~i~`'' G = ~ • " °
l
SEPA RBVI2 OVSR 40 PARKING SPACSS I
CQMMm3': dol-
CM& RZVzzW CRI'rI{AL HATERMS (ST.L CANK)
C90~ERT~s
~GIN~ APPROA+SSPLXIDt/DRanow ,
c'rOMlNTSt
BAIG2OR SZTE DRA2~GS '1O BB RmIEWS~ ~~0• ~I IT'~ow~ts ~ C • ~ Q ~
C.~ S ~ . 3 . a~►~~~ ~
Z. ~s~ ~
.
t
V 1 ~ ~ ? Q.~a1e +
w~~ ~a~o p 4032784
~1~119a6 f1156J1
Vr*"Ted .,.l~ a EhG E~S 10 00 Spokane Co, Wd
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
Spokane Couaty, Washington
EASEA"IENT
The Grantor, Thomas E Clemson, of the County of Spokaae, State of Washmgton, for and in consideration uf Mutual
Benefits, the receipt of wbich is hereby aclmowledged, grants to Spokane County, a poutical subdrvision of the State of
Washington, an Easement over, under, upon and across the hereinafter descnbed lands situated in the County of Spokane,
State of Washngton
AFFECTS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS 45104 0201 AIVA 45104 0202
A non-exclusive Easement over and across lhat portion of Tract 97, VERA as recoFded in Volume "4"
of P1ats, Page 30 ia the Caunty of Spokane, State of Washtngtoa, Ttus Easement to be used for slope
gradmg, more particularly descnbed as follows
BEGINNING at the Northwest comer of said property, thence S 00°03'57"E , along the West line of said
property, a distance of 344 96 feet, thence S 89°56'03"W ,a distance of 5 00 feet to the True Pomt of
Beguinwg of tlus descnption, Thence S 00°03'57'B , a distaace of 258 14 feet, thence S 68°58'30"W , a
distance of 16 08 feet along the South line of said property, thence N 00°03'57"W , a distance of 36 20
feet, thence N 03°24'09"W , a distance of 49 59 feet thence N 02°38'51"W , a distance of 88 80 feet,
thence N 08°57' 19"W , a distance of 90 60 feet to the True Point of Beginning
The Easement as shown hereon are hereby granted to Spokane County and its authonzed agents, and to the Public for
Road purposes, mcluding but not lunited to slope grading, outting and or filling grantors property for roadbed purposes
and other usage deemed necessaryr by the Spokane County DivYSion of Engineerung for the safety and welfare of the
Publie No fence or porhon thereof will be constructed witlun said EasemeAt wlthout permission of the Spolcane County
Division of Engineenng, nor wdl any objects be plaeed w said Easement that would obstruct the sight distance necessary
for safe and efficient velucular movement Any other Easements granted or dedicated within this Slope Easement area
will be suborduiate to the nghts cxeated by this Easement and are subject to Spokane C'ounty Division of Engnneenng
permit process pnor to usage
The Easement and the agreements and duUes provided for herein shall run wrth the land and shall be bmding on, and
shall inure to the benefit of tbe parties referenced herem, theu heus, successors and assigns
IN VVCTNESS WHEREOF, ~ have hereunto set ,yy band(s) and seal(s) tlns Z? day of
199,,
R E Ltuksu 1 like"t
f'
B
Y
CTholas E Clemson 8pake j uuunty Tr~easurer
goc"
~
gY
STATB OF WASHINGTON )
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss
I certify that I know or have sahsfactory evidence that Thomas E Clemson, a single person is the individual
who appeared before me, and said indrvidual acknowledged that he signed this instrument, and acknowledged it
as his free and voluatary act, for the uses and purposes menrioned in the instrument
WO
IIIf/ 199 ts
Dated tlus day of d-~
~~~~0~ • ♦~~i
~
~ %%0 TAIVy NOTARY PUBLIC
~ : ~
In aad for the State of Washiagton,
residuig at Spokane
My aPpointment expires
ocfwaylky1eW95147s1km
fL~-r VAi
~
Log ifl Dikloo,.4t ('q Par0G1,# Lls I o Ll c?2~. _
Road NameJRkf --mg,~,w,~ P. -**(r22
Purposs
r~re,ared 8y ~6 Kc.eo . . . ~
~t
eq 8y (t~and ~nv) LQU2 9~
- - ~032Tof 2
, ~~tlt~r ,c g8
~ ~ ~ 1~,1a~s
is p~ o SPOIS:ANE COUNTY DMSION OF ENGINEERING
Spokane County, Washington
DRAINAGE EASEMENT
The Grantor, Thomas E Clemson, of the County of Spokane, State of Washmgton, for and in consideration of
Mutual Benefits, the receipt of which is hereby aclmowledged, grants to Spokane County, a poLtical
subdivision of the State of Washuigton, an Easement over, under, upon aad across the hereinafter descnbed
lands situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washuigton
AFFECTS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO 45104 0201
A Non-exclusive Easement over and across that portYOn of Tract 97, VERA, as per plat thereof
recorded tn Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, Spokane County, Waslungton This Easement to be
used for retenhon\detentton of stormwater, more particularly descnbed as follows
beginning at the Norihwest corner of said proporty, thence S00°03'S7"E , along the West line of
said property, a distauce of 93 75 feet, thence S 89°56'03"W , a distance of 5 00 feet to rhe True
Powt of Beguinmg of tlus descnption, thence S 00°03'57"E , a distance of 110 00 thence
S 89°56'03"VV, a dhstance of 13 00 feet, thence N 00°03'57"W , a distance of 110 00 feet,
thence N 89°56'03"E , a distance of 13 00 feet to the True Point of Begimmng
Located m the Southeast Quarter (SE 14) of the Southeast Quarter (SE of Section 10,
Townslup 25 North, Range 44 East, W M, Spolane County, Waslungton
1i1
The Easement granted t ~ and its authonzed agents is for the sole purposes of allowing natural
draunage and/or xuna ~pathat~c f bove descnbed lands The Grantor(s) hereby agree not to obstruct,
artificially collect orMft h~tgb~ ~vv~oss or adjacent to the above descnbed lands The Grantor(s) agree
that Spokane County9ccepis~esponsilu}rty for mauitaimng the drainage Easement The Grantor(s) accept
complete and total r T%% ~o .m istrucdon and perpetual mai.ntenance of the facll~ues located v~nthin
tlus drainage Easemen~eF~ ansAnlhl the office of the Spokane County Engineer
y
r'~`! i ~ •
The Grantor hereby releases'1§0okane`County, and all its officers, employees, and agents from any responsibtuty
or liability for any damage whatsoever including inverse condemnation by or to any aad all persons or properiy
ansmg out of or in any way incident to or attnbutable to the storna drainage within said Easement
The Easement descnbed hereinabove is to and shall nui with the land. No modification of the boundanes of
said Easement can be made witbout the pnor approval of Spokane County
R E. Excise Tex Exempt
pM q to
spo co Treasurer •
~
~
~T &-6
~~44
~
4032783
~ Pae 2of2
0930611996 11,5I1
11111 lllill AS gg pp Spokane Co, V1
co E~ ° E
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ~ have hereunto set _.&~rf hand(s) and seal(s) this -Z~ day of
199_42_
~
7 omas E Clemson
STATE OF WA►SHINGT4N )
COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss
I certify that Iknow or have sahsfactory evidence that Thomas E Clemson, a single person is the individual
who appeared before me, and said individual acknowledged that he signed ttus mstrument, and aclcnowledged it
as his free and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes menhoned in the Mstrument
Dated ttus day of ,199_&
NOTARY PUBLIC
~ ~0~ In and for the State of Washington,
v~ pUe`IC o~~ residulg at Spokane
~~~°•g~, IN4b ,MY aPPointmeat expues t'~~~
a
r
M1iveylgyleVh95 147e1km
.
♦
i
r ~
t
`0C-3 LAL
~
~
Filed for Record at Request of
TO Brian C. 8alch ~
220 West Main Avenue
Snokane. WA 99201
STATUTORY WA Y DEED
THE GRANTOR, CUSTOM 1031, INC , a WasbingEon corporauoa, for and m consideration of
COMPLETION OF AN IRC § 1031 TAX DEFERRED EXCHANGE BY TRANSFER FROM GRANTOR AS
INTERMEDIARY AND NO OTHER CONSIDERATION GIVEN OR RECEIVED, conveys and wanmnts to
THOMAS E CLEMSON, a single person, the following descr,bed real estate, situated ia the County of
Spokane, State of Washwgton
Tract 97, EXCEPT the South 475 feet therea►f, AND ALSU EXCEPT a!l that paxt thereof lyuig
Northerly of a luie drawn parallel with and distance 100 feet Southerly when measured at nght angles
from the center lwe of Pnmary State Highway No 2, VERA, according to Plat recorded m Volume
"O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane Counry, Washington
SUBJECT TO easements, covenants, restrictions and encumbrances of record
Dated c l2 1 , J996
CUSTOM 1031, INC
~
at t' .
G Bates, Vresident
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
Couaty of Spokane )
On this Z 6 day of S 1996, before me, the undersigned, a Notaiy Public m and for the State
of Washuigton, duly commissconed and sworn, personally appeared Gary Bates, to me known to te the
President of Custora 1031, Inc , the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledgei the
said uistniment to be the free and voluntary act aad deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the said mstrument
Witness my hand and official seal hereto aff'ixed the day and year last above written
, -
SANDRA R R18A
JIL'
STATE OF WASNINGT A&a
ON
NOTARY--6-- PUBLIC Notary Pubhc in and for the State
1.1Y COAIMISSION EXPIRES 8-03-99 of Washington, residing at Spokane ~ ,
Printed name la o, rr e'c2 ~ lt ~
My commissioyi expires - f
~
t
<
~
u`
Filed far Record at Request oP
TO 8rfan C Balch
220 West Ma1n Avenue
Sookane. WA 99201
5TATUTORY WA Y DEED
THE GRANTOR, CUSTUM 1031, INC , a Wastungton corporauon, for and m consideration of
COMPLETION OF AN IRC § 1031 TAX DEFERRED EXCHANGE BY TRANSFER FROM GRANTOR AS
INTE~MEDIARY AND NO OTHER CONSIDERATION GIVEN OR RF.CEIVED, conveys and wartants to
THOMAS E CLEMSON, a single person, the foUowing described re.ai estate, situated ia the County of
Spokane, State of Washington
SEE ATTACHED
SUBJECT TO easements, covenants, restrictions and encumbrances of record
Dated w ZP , 1996
CUSTOM 1031, INC
~
Aoko
Varyv Bates, resident
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
County of Spokane )
On this Ve day of _,Tv,.r4 , 1996, before me, the underslgned, a Notary Pubhc m and for the State
of Washington, duly commissioned and swom, personally appeared Gary Bates, to me known to be the
Fresident of Custom 1031, Inc , the corporation that executed the foregoing uistrument, and acknowledgod the
sald instnument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein
menUoned, and oa oath stated that he is authonzed to execute the said insttv.ment
Witness my hand and official seal hereto aff'ixed the day and year last above written
.
,
SANORA R. RIBA
STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary Pub[ic ~.n and for the State
NOTARY - ~--PUBLiC of Waslungton, residing at S okane
1, Y 1'OIOA115510N EXPIRES 5-03-99 prmted name ~ LGt,. s z2/ ~!~'0"
~ ' My commission expues 57- -f ~1 7
VARLkNCE ~ APPLICAN'I'S NamE .~~~ws~~
BLDG * 7 cawl&r
OTTiER # NAILIING ADDRESS.AQZ d--
S .90 , T Z.Ar ~ R •~f :Ab.&A"bvdff "Zopm
PARCEL # 6 2oo 2 PHONE - HOM'F
ROAD VAME PHONE - WO ~~G Z
R~
X 140
'Me following documents are aeeded before the Spokane Counry Englaeel's Departmtent can begm processmg your
vanaace or budding applLcauon as appraved. (509) 456-3600
~AGREMCENT TO PAY FEES have been collected.
~ RECORDED COPY OF DEED, DEED OF TRUST, contract or conveYmg instrumenL These mar be
obcaiaed from che Counry Auditor, Znd Qoor ot che Courthouse
I.EGAL DESCRIMON of vour access easeinenL
.1 USTIlvG OF YAMZ3 of mdividuais who wtll be supung the documents Ihese indmdnal names
should appear as che person(s) legallv sign theu name
!rd0V01j'1A5 Aff- ~.st c~,tJ
~A, CURRF.~~1T ISSESSOWS 1RAP wfuch ciepicts the locaaon of vour propertv
OPVNtTRSET NUCRO-RUN 'Mese may be obmaed trom che Countv Assessors, 1st tloor, of the
Courthouse, Jelfersoa entraace. rncf door oa the left.
'Me necessasy ciocuments wdl be prepared bv ctte Engiaeer"s Deparcment, Right-of-Wav Secnon, upon provmon of
ctie mtornanon noced above You will be nonfed arhen the docuaients ara readv for signature. Ihe documents mav
be seat to vau, however IT SHOULD SE vOTED 1'BAT ALL SIGNATURES VIUST BE v E Zhe
Eagineer's Department does have aotanes available Lf you choose to sign che documeats at our otfice
~ Please caU whea ceadv Ptease mail wtien readv
/
Noace co PnbLc ~ Right-of-Wav ~ Br 'aflbg
~~T
COMMENIS
07
Right-of•Way Agent Oleeo!p[.E Forward Eo vou froal
k1p1f1noaoe.192
Inlaird Construction Company _
Lic #iNLANCC06602 ~ ~~TTEM Ot~ UO~ 1~SEDUTQ1.
1620 North Mamer Road
P O Box 14727
SPOKANE, WA 992140727
Phone (509) 891 5162 0'°TE' 1ae No
FAX (509) 922 2251 51 C7&
ON
TO 1C.Ab
RE-
WE AAE SENDING YOU P.Attached 0 Under seperate cover via the following items
~ Q Shop drawings C) Prints D Plans O Semples O Specifications
,,,;,Copy of letter F-I Change order 0 -
COP1E5 DATE NO DESCRiPT10N
I ~ ~ ~ ~ /3 ~si~~•~ ~ t~~,~
~
THESE ARE TRANSMITTEO as checked below
CI For epproval L-D Approved as subrnitted D Resubmit copies for approvai
~For your use D Approved as noted ❑ 8ubmit copies for distribution
>
CI As requested 0 Returned for corrections ❑ Return - correEted prints
Q For rewew and comment Cl
0 FOR 81DS DUF 19 C) PRINTS RETURNEO AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
COPY TO SIGNEO ~ •
Il enclosuros am apf as norod kJndry aoNry us at onae
•
June 26 1996
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR DRADVAGB &I.SErW1VT FOR
An exclusive easement over and acrass that portion af Trad 97, VERA, as reoorded in Volume "0" of
plats, page 30 tn the County af Spokane, State of Washington. Ttus easement to be used for
retention/detention of stormwater, more particulary de,scn'bed as follows
Beguning at the northwesi oorner af said property thenoe S 00°03 57"E alang the vwest line of
said property, a chstance of 93 ?S feet, theaoe S 89°56'03"W a discance af 5 00 feet to the True
Foint of Hegmniag of tus descnption, thence S 00°03'S7"E a disMaoe of 110 00 feet thenoe
S 89°56'03"W 13 00 feet thence N 00°03'S?"W 110 00 feet, thence N 89°56'03"E 13 00 feet
to Ehe Trne Poomt of Beginnmg.
Containing 1430 s E more or less
LEGAL DESCRIPTIOM FOR SLOPl's EASEAIBNT F01L
An eacctumve easemeat over and across that porhon of Traa 97, VERA, as reoonded in Volume "0" of
plats, pape 30, in the County of Spokane, State of Washtagton Tlus easement to be used for slope
grading, more parttculary descnbed as follows
Beguuung ai the northwmt corner of said property thenoe S 00°03'S7"E along the west Lne af
said property a d~stanoe of 344 96 feet, thence S 89°56'03"W a cLstance of S 00 feet to the True
Fomt of BeVnnung of tlus descnptwn, thence S 00°03'S7"E a distaace of 258 14 feet thenoe
S 68°58 30"1N 16 08 feet along the soutb luie of saud pnoperty; thenoe N 00°03'S7"W 36 20
feet, thence N 03°24 09"W 49 59 feet, thenca N 02°38'S 1"W 88 80 feet, theace N 08°57 19"W
90 60 feet to the True Fomt of Begmiu..ng
Contauung 3362 3 sE, more or less
~LL
rQ
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DNISION 06 ENGIrFEERINC AND ROADS • A DMSIOV OF TF3E PLSBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEtV'T
L'Villiam A Johns P fi County Engmeer Dennis M Scott P E Duector
Apnl 23, 1997
Jay Bonnett, P E
J R Bonnett Eagwcering
9306 North Newport Highway
Spokane, WA 99218
SUBJECT B95147 - Ialand Cominerce Park
Plan Change Approval
Pavement Cross-Slopes
Gentlemen
I am enclosing a copy of the appraved Plan Change Request Please note that the mylar set of the
road plans wfl1 need to be revLsed, please call Ed Farry to arrange a convenient Ume to make the
revistons
If you have any questions, please call Ed Parry at 456-3600
Very vuly yours,
W il l iam A Johns, P E
Spokane County Engineer
p P E
Edwar J y, Jr , P E
Plans Review Engiaeer
encls Design Deviacion Request B95147
cc pmjecc file
revtewer
1026 W Broadway Ave SPckaae WA 49260-0170 (509) 456-M00 FAX. (509)324-3478 TDD (509) 324-3156
L
_ REQInT FOIt BMIUNO I)EVIAZ'ION
' $30.00
DATE
612- ROAD NAAM A~&t - CRP/Rm,#
Nt1I1E OF PLAT ~tloA/t
ADDRESS OF BLDG-,JYo~ A/ &-&MeYL-
MA1Vg: OF BIJDG PROJECTx.~•t LcN ~ 46 E~ BLDG# B9 g T R
rEDERALJS"TATE PR;OJE4'T # ~ PRO]ECT LZAIIT3 %
EX~STIl~tG CONDTTTONS PROPOSID WROVEMENTS
~
ROAD WIDTS YAlULAt ' lo 24, ~p x ~ 12-
ZOAD SURFACfi
AVG DAMLY TRAFFIC
~ Gtiuse= Traft Count Demgn Year Traffic Couat
PROJECT DESGRa'['ION MVA OU 4 E S T M&m &1- A" A.&OMOV ze ~
&,p
~
r 6ugSh4etm" AM L4t 77rrP'~! Z2 e-
PROFOSED DESIGN DEVIATION-Ij `0",4,
Lec.~ ~s . D~v~~r~ ~ ~ ~-r~~ ~ r ~S ~
NSTIFICATION ~
~Ju s r/~ I c~-~U..~ Q~► _V2
~
sL~HZVQ'ITE1D BY ` ~ ~•~t~,~ i~ ~~'~I'1 ~ATE ~
aDDRESS ~ _ CODB
PHONF # .J
AD TIYE VARIMM FEE 4F SMQ,Q. PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY 10111"
1026 W HROAMAY SPOKANE WA 99200170 PHONB (509)456=3600 FAX (SM324-3478
-MUEST watxEn'aE RevMwm a►[iHD[rrFtM)s-
s ~ RE+CHITFD BY DA'TB
~ -
a
~ =M*q Amm✓ nuqadS
-
~
PMDMMd mN amM IMPWMEW= 89 Pamu"d I'p IF m Do °~/.AA P~AWUd'
~ - .
•N4IL~ om Q
5~~3'3i~JAII ~O~ ~[1VSOdS
a~eQ maft ===ado ~
=Act&d IOI1 MOMPM/Ak FaADJddV FaA&iddd
MQ =fNd
2,41154 PMOIMd IOx
t
=Q ~ AMBN =fatd
~ ~ti • ( ) ( ) )
y ~
PaAmddvmN luppig,b pa&olw pa&ojw
A
You,OIIHO imd
4
?
AJ nLVV►RCV
MAX SLOPE = 2N 1V
EXI
C01
EARTN BERM PER P
D?L 4/ST2 TYP CONCRETE APPROACH 5 SLO E
T
PER ~OKANE COUNTY ST2 EASEMEN
STD OWG A-7
DRAINAGE EASEMENT AROUNO TYPE "8" CURB ~D p
POND (11a x 13 )
& CUTTER STa 6
MATCH EXISTIN6 PAVING
AT HATCHED AREA
~ ) 3 ~ 9 6 0 198 0
• .~----r -
188
.
~o~ ~
.
J I ~
. . r ,
e
t g >
%p N N
O
04
r
a
RELOCAlE FlRE
~IN CURB HYORANT & RE-EStABUSN
~ W
CENTERUNE CUR CONSiRUGTiON lUM
GUTTER N
4 1+3579 ~U
INLET 4 IMOE CURB INLET TYPE I
/
RER SPOKANE COUNTY TYP
N
GRASS •208» PONQ PER STD DYYY6 6-8 (OEPRESS
~
N EDGE OF PROR4SED
SPOKANE COUNIY S1DS 2") 1 E = 2088 73 L ASPHALT PAVING
~ S
TOTAL FlR AREA=470 SF SEE OTL 2jST2
/
TYP apA
1
/
EDEE OF R0W SAWCUT EXISIING EDGE OF
-
PAVEMENT FOR SMOOTH
TRANSI110N
P
3EGIN STREEt IMPROVEMENTS ASTRUCTION
,TA 0+6135 (FlELD VERIFY) FIRE HYDRANT WEST MEADBOLT
4.EValION=1993 34
'
~
(CONTRACTOR VERIfY W/ SURVEYOR) DEVELOPERS
OF PLANS AND
nONS OF 1HE
-wEa coNSrRUCnoN
iMWATER MANA(EMQVT
S~REE MPR0VFMFK`
Y TME sPoKar~E couNnr P AN
J. R. BoNNETT ENGiNEERiNG
CML A SIRUCTURAL F.NGlNEERlNG/G10NSUL77MG
4306 N NEWPORT NICflWAY
SPOKANE WA 99218
(S09) 468-7626
Mazch 28, 1997
Re Mamer Road Street Improvements - Request for As-Bwlt construrtion
denation
Proposed deviahoa
A.pproval of less tban 2% As-Bwlt roadway cross grades at isolated locaaons alon,g the unproved
aLgnmemt
Justification
As dlustrated by the attacbed skecch and descnbed by the As-Bwlt cross grade calculations, the
cross gradES along ttus aLgnment. from the exisnag edge of pavement to the ed$e of the new
concrete curb and gutter, vary from 59% to 2 35% While che Spokane Couaty standards oeqwre
a muumum of 2% cross grade, it s6ould be noted that the exsting Qauer cross grades exist for
uaty short distances (125' or less) And the majvnty of this roadway oocnrs where loqgitudinal
grades are in eaccess of 10% fiven at the most cntical crm grade of 59%, wluc6 occurs for a
longtudinal distance of less than SO', the lon,giardwal street grade Ls approxmately 6 4% Based
on the auachad vector diagram and calculations, it caa be seen that a slope of 2% wfll be acineved
from a powt at the edge of the exumW pavmg (8 5' from edge of gutter) to a pomt along the
gutter at approximatety 2' down from the veccor nocmal to the cutb Lne
Therefor+e, mnce dus secaon of the roadway does slope toward the cwrb, aad due to the sweper
lonWtudinal street grade,s, it is be[ieved t6at runoff generated on the strm will be coaveyed to the
guttet, flow down aloag the edge of the aLgament and into the dLsposal faciLdes
Based on the abave jusaficaaons, we reoommend approval of ttus As-Bwlt construction dewaaon.
:
~
NEW OOHSiRUC110N I EjoS1WG .
~ R 0 W R.O IM
R 0 w FACE 29.0
CA1CJi PdNT ~ %cr _ y
OEdGndi
EAsDAD+T ~ s' io' . r/RQaE~t ~ v~Es
- i - ~ ExtSnkG RoAo
ovERuY As aEoro vaR
sMooTM muuSna+.
rrPE 'e cuRe & anvt 4 aau 'e' Aca vER
PER SPOKANE COUNTY r wS,ooT SPWRCAnONS
sm owc A-a
,Dn
^SAwGIT EOS1WC ASPFtAIT aasmic asPnut vAwNc
'r0 & MATCN TO bctS11NG EOGE. /
~ rCn 3« pcISiMC GRWNO Z'rP
~rns~o cwa~. c,,, Rew • /a
~~x t~ sto~.
o _~u
COMPnCTED F1LL OYER ~ ' ~ //~T% S/%.'~/1 / / :►II"p~?NF
pOSiM NA'IIME Shc. ~ sii1:111?III~III
:Ill:l~~llf 11)
i
i
z wAx ~
.
r ~
8 - S/8 ~tlNUS Cf~JStlm
~ SlRFApNG TOP COURSE tO11PACTEO Y'~MAEQ-
~
y. ~ COwP11C1E0 NAiWf S~ ~ rL~,00T SPEditCAnON~
v oR coWAc~ - As- gu%tr STw-r t+paof cR+.c s
I~R- ~A ~
arsnKC ciou~% sw G
' w. OEAFds AND ORGAwfC
?n~=111 MATERIAL BEt~ PIAGNC FN. \ 3~ ~
, s~EEr sECnaN ~o
ST2 scuc ers Ec/~ 2ot•o
EC/f4 '
1 199490 AAK EASEWNT 0 ~ E)ASINC HOUSE I
EG/iC Tql PMTS,
" 49 --,r
1
20d
ti
, ` 4f
~
~
,
MAMER ROAD • As buUt Street Cross Grede Catcutadons
CenterUae Rod xardft EG Dev in Rad teadiog 8(i Flav a L Rad nadft a FG Fdev a Craa slape FG Elev 0 itod rmding Hev atap `(urb Street Smdon ~ centertin cenhrline a 10' offse! 10 d'fset edge of gotter edge af gmter dowfico oi a top of curb of carb helght Grade
gud.cr
62500 0 77 0 00 189 -032 127 -0.50 -2 12% -061 0 90 -013 048 15O%
S97 69 505 0 00 536 -031 550 -043 165% .056 S 10 -005 051 1S S%
S7500 8.54 0 00 8.87 -037 8 99 -049 1.41% -060 8.39 -004 051 1S 0%
S48.21 190 0 00 2.24 .034 243 -053 2.24% -064 2 04 -014 050 15 OS6
52S.00 549 0 00 572 -0.23 3 86 -037 16S% -048 546 0 03 051 140%
50000 9 08 0 00 423 -017 945 -037 2as% .049 9 07 001 0 49 13 S%
47S 00 2 01 0 00 225 -018 231 -024 -07156 -033 193 014 0 49 lt S%
45000 S 13 0 00 3 39 -024 3.39 -0 44 235% -053 321 -006 0 49 116%
42SA0 7 97 0 00 831 -0.34 940 -043 1A64b -0 S4 8 04 -007 0 47 30.2%
40000 1036 0 00 10.86 -0.30 1091 -055 -0.S" -066 10.53 -017 0 49 IO l%
375 00 0 66 0 00 115 -0A9 123 -037 -0.44% -068 0 84 -018 050 6 4%
35000 2.37 0 00 275 -038 2 80 -0.43 -0.59% -054 6 4S8
32500 3 64 0 00 3 89 -020 4 09 -0.40 2.3S% -031 3 69 0 00 0.51 6 4Sb
300M 470 0 00 4 90 -020 310 .040 2.35% -051 4 72 -042 0 49 219b
219.31 3.20 0 00 336 -016 1M -027 2 97 -023 .050 2 9%
20019 3 82 0 00 3 83 -003 4 03 -021 1.1Z96 -032 3 62 020 4.52 2.2%
16802 S l5 0 00 931 -016 f.86% .027 4 93 -022 -049 51%
130 00 380 0 00 598 -018 212% -029 557 -023 .052 9 4%
A ~ .
u~~
Y
S;~c~
.
Tlo~l ~tt, IrJ~ e.►~A'r1o~~
~ orE
l~u. S~ ~~r (~~r~ D~TtA~~ a~ Fn+M
~a~~ Qo-,►e.bm
«
/ Z
J R BONNETT ENGINEERING Joe el G gt
9306 Notth Newpott Highvvay S"m "O oF
SPOKANE, WA 99218 caLcuLATEn aY DATE
TEL (509) 466-7626 CMECKEO 8Y DATE
FAX (509) 468-7534
scaLE
-
CQ+SS G~R~ar .L Te G~ ~T~ = .S'9~
LoNl~ ► TvGi ~s?~- 67R~f-DF s' t~ 4/~ of ~ ~
Pdbe ~ ~t Tr~
z
y ~
~
43 - ~ 0(o4-~CL ~ ~ - SG
r= ` g S 2t 2~- = 2 73' (
S~A ~+''Sa a ?v t I d' ~ j38 • 4
~ S~• zt~
s= , - 02vL = 2 ob Z 7
8,73 -
~ - r3 4°
Pv~, Ta Eoele- oA &arrtrz.. e~ 2 v.
QG 2 (I3~ 24 / ~ S`
i'01,14i T u b tNIK„ O Is rA✓c &
!s > Z~o ,s~~ . -
c++ nc~n,r.,a ~a.rF
Memorandum
Date April 17, 1997
To Bill Hemmings
From Ed Parryqf
Sub3ect 895147 - Inland Conmerae Park
Design Deviation
1 J R Bonnett Engineering is requestinq approval of a Design Deviation
request related to pavement design for this project
2 Bonnett requests that cross-slopes less than the minimum Z% be allowed
for short distances alonq the Mamer Road frontage iraprovements for this
project His analysis indicates that the longitudinal slope of the road at
the area in question will effectively provide a 2$ cross-slope within 2
feet downstatian of a given point
3 Ae should provide this recommendation to the County Engineer Recozmaend
APPROVAL
1 R BONNETT EffiINtcIRING dIKTIEK J[F 4°°M@W0UaL
9306 North Newport Hi
SPOKANE WA 992 ?S'
~ • DAXE JOB ht0
~
TEL (509) 468 7626 e FAX (509) 46$-7534 "TTENTtO 6b
TO RE
0I~-~+•p -DvL47/6 Co~t rZ~.c~ '
~P~vr t~ r~ ~ ~c P~eo r✓~~r ~
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached CI Under separate cover via the followrng dems
>
• Shop) drawmgs 0 PriRts Ci Plans O Samples Q Specffications
❑ Copy of letter ❑ Change order 0
COPlES I DATE ~ NO I DESCR1PT10N
A-6(jfCr- A#Pw4i ot-✓rI?-i7dA! /?<,!p ueS r -1v /-w
~ -
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
)CLFor approval Q' Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit coprES for approval
Cl For your use O Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for dfstribufion
❑ As reQuested ❑ Retumed for correcUons ❑ Retum cor-rected pnftts
~ CI Far rewew and comment O
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RET,URNED AFTER LOAN T4 US
REMARKS _
~
,
I iQq1
~
COPY TO
SIGNED
N enc/asunes are not as noted klndly Rol/ly us at o
.
.
PERM T DOCUMENT TRANSM TTAL
Spokane County Division of Buildings
1026 W 6roadway Ave
Spokane, WA. 99260
Project Address Project
.
Business Name
CONTACT Phone
IVlailing Address
COORDINATOR Phone
v~
DOCUfVIENTS ClRCULATED
Descnpfion e~~ft Zwft mom umnin SCAP"
Aol Y",
,
Received 6y
Date of Transmittal Cinculated by
~
1 R BONNETT ENG ERING
Hig~way
9306 Nortlh N
SPOKANE, TO 9 rt 92 ~8 -
o„TE Z V ~9G JO8 M O'
TEL (509) 468-7626 ~ FAX. (S09) 468-7534 ATIE"
Vovte,~ ~,~o
TO '
COV~li~' ~i~~r~ ~tl~'e~J ~ .~i~/t~/,ra L'o r~l~! ~CE ~if,~•~c.
V2 5 ov lEaJTl
rnVED
WE ARE SENDING YOU I(Attached o Under separate cover vIa the following rtems
>
O Shop drawings ❑ Prmts eW Pians 0 Sampies
(J Copy of tetter CJ Change order a9 cAtGS
COPIES I DATE I NO I DESCRIPTION
~U-0.4 Z
~i✓~~ ~s ! 1 ~ ~i~ZG ,f4 6
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked befow
)Q For approval D Approved as submitted C Resubmit copies for approval
El For your use 0 Approved as noted C Submit capies for distnbuton
m As requested O Returned for correcbons 1-1 RetUm conected pnrrts
>
CI For review and comment 0
E FOR BIDS DUE 19 Cl PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
JUN 2 7 199fi
SPO NM]
CQPY TO
SfGNED
N enelosures ere not es noted kind/y noN4usa RC e
BOND ESTIMAYE '
PROJECT inland Construcbon Offic;e N 1628 Mamer NAME Doug Busko DATE 27-Jun-96
DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST
1) Drywell - Type A EA 1 125000 125000
2) Drywell - Type 8 EA 156000 0 00
3) Grate - Type 1 EA 31500 0 00
4) Grate Type 2 EA 34000 0 00
5) Grate - Type 4 EA 1 30000 30000
6) Backflll Far DW CY 30 1600 48000
7) Concrete Inlet EA 75000 0 00
8) C M Pipe 10" Dia LF 2300 0 00
9) C M Pipe 12' Dta LF 2700 0 00
10) C M Pipe 15" Dia LF 2780 0 00
11) C M Pipe 1 S" Dia LF 31 50 0 00
12) Precast Manhole EA 150000 0 00
13) Solid lid EA 31000 0 00
14) Drtch Excavabon CY 1000 0 00
15) Sod SF 470 0 70 32900
NON STANOARD DRAINAGE ITEMS
1) Wilbert Vauit Curb Inlet EA 25000 0 00
2) 0 00
3) 0 00
4) 0 00
5) 0 00
6) 0 00
ORAINAGE SUBTOTAL 235900
16) Monuments EA 18500 0 00
17) Barricade LF 3300 0 00
18) Street Signs EA 8500 0 00
OTHER SUBTOTAL 0 00
GRADING, SURFACING, CURB AND SIDEWALK
19) Rough Grade CY 178 1000 178000
20) Top Course CY 107 1600 171200
21) Base Course CY 1600 0 00
22) Asphait Concrete Tons 146 4440 648240
23) Curb Type A LF 7 00 0 00
24) Curb Type B LF 490 8 00 392000
25) Curb Type R LF 8 00 0 00
26) Sidewalk SQ YD 1670 0 00
NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS
1) 0 00
a) 000
3) 0 00
4) 0 00
GRADING AND SURFACING 1389440
GRAND TOTAL 16,25340
STREET QUANTITIES
PI24JECT NO - B95147 DESIGNER- DWB DATE- 6/27/96
PROJECT DESCRIPTION- INLAND CONSTRUCTION 4FFICE COMPLEX N 1628 MIAMER
STREET # 1
NANTE- MAMER LENGTH- 490 44 FT WIDTH- 10 00 FT
BEGINNING STATION = 135 79 ENDING STATION = 626 23
ONE SIDE ONLY PWIDTF-= 18 50 EWIDTH= 8 50 QWIDTH= 0 00
TERM # 1 TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 75 00
TERM # 2 TAPER TAPER LENGTH = 100 00
ITEM MEASUREMENT QUANTITY
SURFACE AREA- 5779 40 S F
ROADWAY EXCAVATION 0 83 FT 178 4 C Y
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 0 50 FT 107 0 C Y
CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0 00 FT 0 0 C Y
ASPHALT CONCRETE 0 33 FT 146 3 TONS
(.'IIRB TYPE B EXISTING 0 00 FT PROPOSED 490 4 FT
TOTALS
ROADWAY EXCAVATION 178 4 C Y
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE 107 0 C Y
CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0 0 C Y
ASPHALT COIJCRETE 146 3 TONS
CURB TYPE B 490 4 FT
sFO KANMCOUNTY + ROAbi.. & DRAINAGE
, SiJBMITTAL C + T
.
PROJECT # DATE 19,4i
PROJfiCT NAME 10414& 1?4,~n 4rT~ T --At~~ A" 1/f- wl eIJ TS
PROJECT SPONSOR -:-r-7-JLAd4D 6Wf 7?,& 2-10^1 TEL #
PROJECT BNGINEER. ✓ D~ o ~/~/~T~ ~ G/i+/~~~/L, ~ ~ .
(Rnad 8~ D~a~gc Plaas)
PROJECT SURVfiYOR TEL #
(Plat)
PLEASE PROVIDE A Ii:ESPONSE TO EACS OF 1EE FOI.LOWIIVG ITEMS
GENIERAL ITEMS
Yp #L13wA0 1 A signed "AGREEMENT TO PAY FEE.S" fotm has been submitted t,o Spokane County along with any
apphcable ptac f~s, pnor to any p~-des~ga/p~vbmittal meeang
vd OrroO,ww~ 2 I 6ave a copy of. and have c+eviewed the most rocent condiaoas of appraval and any EIS/MDNS reqwrements
and c;oadiaons of approval bave been mcorporated m dus plan submittal
PROJECT DESIGN
'ttl oNoowAg 1 I have compteted a minumum of one pre-dmga meemng vrrlch Spokaue County Development 8ogiamrmg
Semces Bpgiaeeis where agreesaeat was reached on dwmp design approar.h
' Yp 0ND0 wAK 2 I have included the resvlts of any geocechnical tesaqg that is reqwred by the design aPProach to venfy dmga
~
~ parameteTs
1
~
~E va rb 0wA0 3 I have inclnded aay cequinod pavemeac des,p calculaavas oa aew PubLc roadways as r+eqwred by the
"SPOKA,NE COUNTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRUCTION", lata ediaon
. ,ra 0 ob 0 wAO 4 The raad aad draiadge planrs oomply vHth the"STANDARD ROAD PLAN" requirements for p1aa, profile,
~ aad typical cross secaon etcmeats ooammed m"SPOKANE COUNI'Y STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND
,
SEVPER CONS'TRUCTION" laoe.sc ediaon exoepc as allowed tbrougti approved design deviaaons
Ya lXw E3 wA 0 S The drauage rtport incorporates die minimum reqmrements for a swrm dmaap anaiysis as aoted un the
' GSM and ocher it,ems wluc;h are appropnate w danoamaoe dat the design meets all reqwraments of the
Spokane County GmdeLnes for Stormwaw Management exoept as allovwed throngh appraved design
devmoffi
E3 to^ 0 6 A complete dmmge bawn map wnth ame of ooncenttation pat6s s6own has been mciuded witb the demled
hydrology calculaaoos Dcaiflage basin map shows toPograPhY ProPosed dmuiage feadues, and oon+elates
with hydrology calcutaaons
~ Yb 0 ra OrvAO 7 I have coordinat,ad traffic cornorol and sigmag raqniremeats vrntb the Spolane County TYaffiC Eagmeer These
c~eqwremeats are shown on a separaZc plaa sh.eet, OR ne uucorporated inw che ptans for each road
,rd 0 rb 0 nrw IO 8 I have tncluded ooptes of all apptoved DESIGN DEVIATIONS whtch are roquiced for thus pt+ojetx.
Yb OmOwA0 9 The plaas and drawage report are stamped, signed, aad dated. and concaias, tbe apphcable canficaaon
statemenL
•U(:1rb0w^0 10 I have iucluded an adequace erosion oontrol plan aad apphcable standard plan notes
Ya E3 w 13 wAM- 11 t have semrod approvals from aU apphcable outude agencies stich as fic+e distncts where apphcable and have
tncluQed proof of theu approvals
Yd cd,.0wA[3 12 I have provided an acoeptabla means for papenual mainteoaace of strcet and drainage fapllaes tbat Ls
acoeptabte to Spokam Cow4ty ad 6ava socured and mludod copies of any roquu+ed easemeats.
Y.. IP r6 0 wA13 13 ! have mewed the plaaz, ealcutatioas and other subu,ual daca for comptetencss, acxucacy and oomsteaey
and have s,bnutted two ooptes of plaos aod (1) bound dtaioage rcpon.
~
Vdcptacvl 010at9S 1
I uaderstand cbat tfie ceqwrements not ~ tove are the onaunum ce4wremeflts necessar perform a cursocy review of the project
plaw, and that adc4aonal infonnat►on sbautd be iflcluded with dus svbmuual 4,s uecessary
~
~ I unde.rstand that thns submiual wnl1 be c6ecimd for compteteness pnor to cmew and that u wtll be retmed for fiuther rofocmation
if it is found co be jncomplece
1 uaderstand Ehar thLs subnuttal wdl not be accepted fur review (and placed on the ceview list) untit alt reqwred infornnatian
~
' has been subrrutted
t
~ Form comPleted bY the respoaoble Eqpaeer
Compaay
~
Address ~,30 ~i MOPOP0Ar J~~✓ ~ ~ e Kfi~/~ G.~l~ 77
Date ~196, Z ip code
SUHMTITAL. Accepood fior review ~ ~ ~ lq.. 'R4
Rewrned for submiual of the follovang
GfiNfERAL ITBM # '
~ PR07ECT DESIGN #
Y
~
t
RESUBMTTTAL 1TEM # - Focm netutne.d t+o
Company Address '
Dat,e '
By - '
Spolrane Couaty Pubhc Works Dev+elopment Sennces
uckQim c oftay9s 2
J R BONNETT EHGI, _RING
9306 North Newpo~t Hrghway
SROKANE, WA 99218
nAlt
TEL. (509) 46&7626 • FAX (509) 468-7534 '~1 `''T`°"` ` .
~au4
TO ~O~/4'~✓~ ,~/LI✓!"y ~i1Jb ~/✓Ei~~ RE
.,Pj J. A-r/ 4 CI wv fN ~-~2[.c.` /~~[t
.
WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached 0 Under separdte cover v►a 4&0 ~~✓r the following items
>
0 Shop drawmgs 0 Prmts 0 Pians 0 Samples 0 Specificatons
Q Copy of letter 0 Change order ~
COPiES I DATE I NO I DESCRIPTION
L~- r•~ G's~}-LGt
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
IQ For approva) 0 Approved as submitked [I Resubmi# capies for approval
.~l Far your use C] Approved as noted 0 Submtt copies for dis#ributlon
~ As reques#ed 0 Returned for cvrrecfions F] Return correGted prints
>
0 for review and comment 0
0 fOR BIOS DUF . 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
RECEIVIED ~
~ 96
SpMNE COUNIY EN6IHEER
COPY TO SIGNEb'~ AL ~ e-o, t-'
Il enciostrres ere not ae noted k/nd/y natlfy us st nce
J R BONNEIT ENGh...c:RING L C U`~L~ ~OO C.r~ l1' ° e - C~'~AJO l~t' e, C~
9306 North NewpA ~2r~hway
SP~OKANE, W 18
aR~ ~ 11-Joe No
L~L
TEL. (509) 46&7626 • FAX (509) 4b&7534 "~1QN
3
TO ME-ef AA-n T ..7mP
h/E .~0c•,vT~ ~ ~
.~'Nr.•~+~~ Co~c~r~~
WE ARE SENDING`YOU 4flttached ❑t Under separate cover via,Z2W)0 k-W tt►e Pollowmg rtems
>
❑ Shop drawings Q Pnnts a Pians L] Samples 0 bpecrficabons
❑ Copy afi letter ❑ Change order 0
CAPIES I DA7E I NO I IDESCRIPT1pN
Z - -
0,e
^qWE~'L yrng'fflr 6A&DE' C-ofte-S - -
-L&MVQ .~'o~4 to'ner Ag'k- - Qoorl ,i 0aE 40gftc5 L~een~
~i6~~vc.. eo"'~t~~1jr _
-
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below
IQ-for approval 0 Approved as submitted CJ Resubmit copies for appeovai
Cf For youF use CI Approved as noted O Submit copies fflr distribution
0 As tequestetl O Returned for correct~ons 0 Retum correrted prmts
>
Q For revrew and comment ❑
0 FOR BIDS DUE 19 O PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS _
COPY TO
SIGNED
N enclosures sra not as note+d, k/nd/y notffy us at on
•
Wilwo
PERM T DOCUMENT TRANSM TTA'WA 1Q Iy"
Spokane County Division of Buiidings '
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA. 99260
,
Project Address iGt$ ut-&otw%v-o- Project # a, -r5~P%4&
Business Name )IqLVN.0
CONTACT ;3d$ LowN~wo Phone -14'1 - 5«Z
Maiiinq Address im
COORDlNATOR .1 Phone
DOCUMENTS CIRCULATED
- Fft , - ,
Description ~ndm, ~ zmvm qo$ftm., „eam ois„ ~ ~wwos SCAPC,
`=e'Pt'. a ?&.044u J16
s'~ ab►c~w►~w~r ~c ' ~ ~
LANDSGAPt ~~t k
~
~
Received 6y
Date of Transmittal Circulated by
~
PItE-Co TRUCTION
fp-R ~_~.Pl~LicArxoN ' rrmE l~
IDATr V CrI1~E~RS
~ ~3~(-m' ~ ~'AL'TH
a~~~s~~G ~ ~ ,
DI1`~~ ~ i . ~
~nffTs ~ SCAMk
Fu~ vrs~r ~ ~
0 , 13
+ ~ -
~
ADDRESS
WP -
~ p~~NE
OWNER
~ -
ADDRESS
a-~ -
BUSiNESS N~E
^ pHplsm
CoNTAGT 'j ~
A.DDRES S
~ . ~
LECAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL NumBER ~
4
CT DES~RI-'TION
DETAILED PRo~ .
~
lb
vALUE ~
~ ~ ~ •i - N ~ ~ z s's ~ x N ~ ~ a~3~-~~,~z~~'~,1`~` t
x..--
~
-
COMMF'N.1.~7 ,~.~t N ~ ,v } K" ~ ~ « y Yt 7 ~
'
:
'1 • i ~ N ~ ~ M ~ x t ~ ~ x. " t~''`~.~
w Y " 7-•~Rreee~ee~r..~; N F ~ .s ~ .
J
C4C~~R~~4T~: pA.`~E
REVIE~N ~ ~ J64
CIRCtTLATED BY
~
i
PERM T DOCUMENT TRANSM TTAL
Spokane County Division of Buiidings
1026 W Broadway Ave
Spokane, WA. 99260
Projec# Address AV'o Project # 94 - ,;.w
Business Name
dz~
CONTACT l~ - Phone 17$ep.. ff~14'7
,
Mailing Address
.
COORDINATOR Phone
DOCUMEIVTS CIRCULATED
Descnpbon eutbona Zwft ~ rrIMs HOann a$mre
Fl-/- uduaes scnPCA ,
^
~
A/046V
"
~ se - ~ - ~
J
ilo,
lw-
Received By
Date of Transmittal Circulated by -
r
MAY ; 1 =6
MAY-22-1996 17 17 1 NLRND CONSTRUCT I ON 509 624 2251 P 10
C ~
SPOKANE ~ )i;1N'I'Y MTERM ROAD D1i►AINAGE
SVBAfMAL C'HWKLS'Y'
QROIECT # a 9_S 147 bAT£
PROJECI' NAMB LA CO L°C PAR IC
PRO1fiC~' SPONSOR . ~TEL A~
PR01ECT EN(31NEER M4! Y ~ c7 A /l TEL # 7~6.2 4
atwd 8 Damaa Pinsl
pRatECT stntvEYoP, rEL #
c~u
PY.EASE PKOYIDE A RESFONSE TO EACH QF THE FOLLOWIING ~F~
~ GENERAL 1TEMS
O/ r. 1 Amgued "AGREEMENT TO PAY F6ES" form 6as bcen submitted co Spokum County aiong widh aoy
apPlicable ptgt fces, pnor ta any pre-destgdlptcsubmittaj amtwg
r. 0 eus F-I 2. I have a copy oC aad have ceviewed the mosc recenc condiaoss of appr+uva! and aay IiiS1MDNS reqwrements
and coadlcians of appraval bavC brxn iacurporacecf in rhis piaa submlccal
PRQJECT DESICN
+ad-*OwA[3 1 t tiave uoanple~cr,~! a wimmum uf uoe pre-desiga n~eeuog wich Spokane C4unty t~velopmeat En~n~nug
Srtvices Eaguieecs wtiere agceenienc was reWLel on drMaage ctftigp sptoacb
Yw 13 rb 13 w^ 0 2 [ have included the cesulrs ut auy gcuca,hmcal cc-snng cbat ts cCqwrtd by che destga oppmach to venfy dmgu
paramCw1b
rd 0r» OsuA4 3 i havc iacludrd any ityuttrd pavemenc design calculstions an new Public wad ys us cequured by the
"SFOKANE CUt]NTY STANDARDS FOR ROAD AND SEWER CONSTRU ON". latm c6uou
r~,~~•13 wA 13 4 The road and dtainage plaas comply wich tbe"STAI+tDARD 80AD PL&V" for plao, pro6te.
and typiCal crou y=ioy elements coamtarcJ tu°SPO[CA1VE COiJ1VTY STAND F4R tiOAD AND
SEWER CONSTRUCTION" lacb-c rcLuon exctpc u Ailowai drough approved dkdp devupoas
To w 0 w,% 13 5 The dramage cepoR moocpocaces die iuinimwu reqwmius,u.s tor a sc4nn dmmge analysls as nortd m che
GSM aud otlicr itents wL" atc aMopn.►tc w dcmum-tmm 1Lat tbe design meetq reqwhmtats of tbr
SpvkAne Cuunty Guululines foc Stonnwacer Managemeac except as allowed dimugb appruved deagn
deviacioas
1460,,0 6 A complece clrarnage basw uup wuL pnie of coaceauratia>> patlis SGowa has beea ud~ w~th the de~a,lec!
as
liydrology ealculauons Drainage basw map bhows eopa~,raphY Proposed ~oag feanucs and cortelaoa
vatL hyGrotugy cal4ulanuns
,nowowA ? All applicable craff'ic sigsung ceqwremeacs are met aud have beea iacocporac=for plan submlua!
r.~~0rvA~ 8 t have wcluded copies ot alt approved DESIGN DEViA'I70NS w~ucb are tlds proJect.
Y..0e*0ruA13 9 Thc piaus aa+l drainage nepoct ace stamped stgned_ aad dated aad centwas thie appllrible cerci6cacf on
scace;ucac
ftoH.oew.p 10 1 have incluclad an adequam etoslou eoatrol pian and appltcable Stan" plan aom,
Yv 0 m. n n"P 11 I Lave securcd approvais from aU appticable oucside agemes sueti as fmC distncts wute appUcable and fnve
iactuded prouf of iheu approvals
r.» 0 M.0 wAtA 12 I Iave pruvided an accxpcable meaa,s for pErgetual rwnwmce ot smeet and facdtaes tbat i3
accepcable co Spokane Cowuy aad lu►vr secured und includrd coptcs of any roqui Eents
r« w13w^0 13 1 tiave reviewed che plaas Lalcutmwns and ucher svbm,aal daca for compleceoe.ss. y aad eenmmcy
and bava svbmltced two eopies ot plans auA (1) bound drainage [epoct
uctpt.cvI 011011095 1
L MAY-22-199b 17 17 I NLAhtDi CANS`fRUCT ION 589 624 2251 P ii
tt3[8W/ WiiL WG lUjuAtLUi63~W uunL• wrra, asv uw ...ti
~ plaas. and thu add'idooat infotymaaon st .ad be mclUded wIth ttu3 submura! as aecessu
IVMI=Mnd that I~s svbmital vwll bc checbed for complewnm pnor to review and that u will be t+etutuod for 6Mtier tnfotnMaoo
if h js 6onud to be inoomptm
I uaderslam! Mat thi4 submUta! wll! not be ascepted foc rewew (aad plaoed on the ceview Ist) uad7 80 MPitcd infwmRbon
6as be,w suDmttLed
Fon vomPWA by dia nspovOte Bagiasxr- /Ilh H,,k /V
cm4m ,'--r
10 5 oV/VE f,~ 9ACG AMMIL S
Zip Code
Dace
AccePced for teview ,
SUBMITCA[. •
~ C~
Retutned for subauual of thc foUowiug
GFNERAL I'MM i► `
egaficr nssicrr #
,
~
.
REsvaKIrrTai. rcc-M Form murmd to
companY
AddmsL
Dam: .
ay Spolmm Counry pubyc Works Devdopmem Setvtas
va41u,►t oteR.yss 2
~
S P O K A N E C O LT N'I" Y
DMSION OF BdVGIADBERING AND ROADS • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEdJT
william A Johns r E Acting County Engmeer Denius M Scott P B Directos
October 4,1995
Mr Robert Townsend
Inland Construction Company
102 Fast Sprague Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99202
Re. Office Park Development at North 1628 Mamer
Dear Bob,
Ttus let#er serves as a follow-up to the pre-apphcatYOn meeting held this mornmg and my
subsequent phone call to you As stated ui the meebng, the ongmal zone change for tlus
parcel was from Agricultural to Restncted Industrial, for the purpose of buildsng and
operating a tool manufactunng busmess In the FindinYgs aad 4rder for ZE-84-81A it
states that the zone change approval of the site took into acccount the type of busmess
which would be located on the parcel, aad the expected level of traffic impact due to the
development The office park concept that you are proposing would very hkely generate
different unpacts thaa the tool manvfacturing busmess
Therefore, the Spokane County Engineer's Department feels that further inveshgahon
into the adequacy of Mamer Road, the Mission/Mamer mtersection, and the Mamer/Nora
intersection, for the traffic generaied by tlus proposal, is warranted The analysis work
shall be done by a Professional Engmeen ceensed m the state of Washuigton
The County Engmeers are committed to helping you resolve any issues which affect the
schedule of your project Please do not hesitate to call if you have any further queshons
1026 W Broadway Ave. Spolcane WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 324-34T8 TDD (SU9} 324-3166
~
r~
f I
I
S1IIC@I'61y,
William A Johns, P E
Acting County Engineer
G%(J
Douglas W Busko, E I T
Plans'Review Engineer
encl Frndrngs and Order, 7.E-84-81 ~
Findings and Order, ZE-84-81A
~ c Jum Harnes, Haines Archrtecture
Bob Brueggemann, County Traffc Engineer
Pat Harper, Transportation Planning Supervisor
Jeff Forry, Setuor Bw.lduig Techmcian
~
i
~
S Pc) K A N E C O U N T Y
OFFICB OF TtiE COUNTY ENCINEER • A DrvMoN oF'tHe Puet.tc Wo
Ronald C Hormann P E, County Engineer Dennis M t , DYrec
AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES
ENGENEER'S AGREEMENT NUMBER
Thia agreement between Spokane County and .-~N ti4,+vt,
rrrauae ot person) '
whose interest in t6e project is 4AMWO'L ,
ecc )
-L`
is entered mto dus ~-~day of 1,19 ~ Tlus agreement is applicable to the ProJect
known as S~~.A-N~ C~~rnftQ.~
~
That the individuals and parhes named herein as having an mterest in the above descnbed property or project
agree to the followmg
1 Reanburse Spokaae County for project review and mpecdon fees as specified in Chapter
9 14 of the Spokane County Code The fee.s wiU be basecl on actual salary costs iacurred
by Spokane Cownty for project revtews and / or tnspections plus a ten percent
admuiLstrattve charge, and wtll be bdled monthly as accrued Any billing amounts due,
includlog any expenses incurred in the collectton of an overdue account, must be paid
pnor to the County's acceptance of the project for filing If a project is approved and/or
filed with a balartice sUll owing, the unpaid balance sha11 be paid witlun 30 days of the
invoice date
2 The understgned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as
spectfied above
3 Any invoices not pmd withtn 30 days of the invoice date will be considered delinquent
If any outstaaduig balance on the account for this project is not paid within 30 days of
the invoice date, no fiuther reviews of the project documents will be conducted uniil the
entue account balance is paid Any balance on the account for this project not paid
within 65 days of the mvoice date may result in legal actioa or the initiation of other
collection procedures, including referral to a collechon agency The Sponsor will be
Iiable for arYy and all expenses incurred by the County for the collection of overdue
accounts
4 The monthly billing should be sent to the attention of
NAME ti Q-z V4'k&4J'r
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE ~f a V..- r4 N~ W~
r ZIP CODE
PHONE # -50 9 7 ~ 7 --S / (a
I understaad that failure to pay these fees may result ia delay m completion or approval of the project or other
possible sanctioas
Cl IF this fee agreement is completed by someone 4ther than the Sponsor (i e, the project
owner or a principal m the firm sponsoring the project), such as the Engmeer desigmng
the project, then written authorizatton from the Sponsor speaficalty authorl73ng the
Agent to egecute this Fee Agreement ts attachei to this F Agreemen0%
SIGNATURE By
(PRINT NAME)
RETURN YELLOW COPY TO SPOKA1vE COUNTY ENGINEERS
klp%flagteemn fee 2/I195
1026 W Hroadway Ave. Spokane WA 99260 0170 (509) 4.56-3600 I'AX (509) 324 347E3 1 UD (509) 324-3166
- ..t
niot if oFWAYbEP_AiR1MEf,T
fu- - - ~ ^
€o1~L fi€ec~ti~ rivN ci~€~ic
l.F-fiW t~~oIM scAMA-
REci~~tocAUUs€ A af i€€M€Nfi
1lMWA~c i ~~RMlT
L ~Sy fr`S =~.•~sh~ =s~'~-zr~t~~~-~~ ~..~i i _c2 2 = - r r- -r-~-~ s~ 0,3 !
J ' ~ f~-~_.~ _ _ _ _ _ ~ vr~t-r~x'~~~
0[I~ ~~f'r~
~I,.~
~
ecAlY
~t "MARr(
RoxYRAMrO
RAv bIMENWHe
SU VOW-effiown oil jliii-s_
WINEUT1,111 ~1o~?
x
sfiAMF
FAjl~i~iv sui~ce dbsitiiioii
ri~Fc McUlA~ io ~N p N x
CAW96AP€ PtAN J200 cotjFLlci) x
Dr-~ieH/UtWiileUepiash Bio-Zk 0etail
~-Q ....~x. _._.~-t-a -:s-ar _ -rzc •~a~.._ ~r-...sis y
v ~ j 4 ~~~a:FdL.~ ;t t ~~~~/~V _ 3.L .r.' w 3 ~ L ~.J,:r ~ « ' ~=_W .~__t ~ ~ r•~
vol cons ruc~~on ~
Ii~1iAc on Rooi
ewele Yotitille ca~cuiatio11s
BVNa e CtoAs 90-cooi1
-pre bevelopecl conjiil67jj-" : _
hosl aevelop~ conc~Qo~, - _ _ ~ _ _ _ _w x ~ - - - - - - - -
-sP€ciAL eot T€Ue
Dci f cALULATIU~"s
P AXTt ~A~MM€R ~~~.tu~~bNs
o cALcuamNs
Rhr€ o EfEfff ioN cl~lcs
io io"Utt sfio`_~tl
i ~ ARAFY ela
44:_~.
oWi rrotN
~~~~cf
Guffj-rOrdces
o 9
croes e~" ~ t~~ d
bt~~ e ~e e ot
btaf1»gA olt Ptons
Cutvd e1I1 fe~us"iio, vc
~ )
Pdvemeni iec on p
p etefto sir~~s _ _ _
ers 61ntn
p
QUr s19ond
~ ~ r
uoouniY :81alip
~
~
f
REPORT OF 101419S PRR,.-APPLICATION CONFCRCNCE
1628 N Ntamer - OPPice Bwtdmg
- - W---~r w ~a.,, ~ ;,~•Y~ ` 81i'I~'IE ' P~41V~ µ ` ^~M''Jl+d~
(
bWNm ConUa41am , tbZ WA ' 49M a~09-'747~62 _
41 &at* _k
lcaOdnRACTOR . Wndtaswuaci+m La'a z ' wA om ~ .5a4-a474t8a
~ARC~IR~Cr, 9e2odlBPtM Amh uf6W&,4aremaed {MA tf x ?9!'~04 509-83"40 1
STA7E ENVIRONML ff&"L[CY ACT (SEPAI
The proposd wes ravi'iewood by the Dlvucoa of Buildiag,e far complwme wa6 dis Stm Fmu+oameatel Pblicy Ad. [t wss ddermiaed
thax previouslY Pr'rParod documcnts end tlireshold determwatan wm adoquate to evaluate tbis propoeal m accardenca with
WAC 197-11-600(2) These documents are on Cde with tha Diviacoa of Bwldlags
PeoJEcr ovERvrew
AppUcaat proposes to ooastruct Phase t of this projea vvhich ie ZB.OOQsq R of otrica erea. This wdl cansist of 3 buDdiags
(budding A4.000 eq ft. budding &7,500 sq R bullding C-12,500 sq ft) Exisung houses wdl remaun oa-slta untd Pheso II is developed
ApPlicant is enticipatiag a wmpldioa date of May 1 1996
RAOURY UF PRQPQrSED
rARM MM _AC7'W* 1'Yi'~_ ' ~-Btwolft~ GROW vift*t' ft43'w ~ iWA"*VWR*1ftr !NOlM
5~~1Y0i~1't!# + I~ ~ ~ "~,i~ k~ . ~l1~000[atd $ a 1i7~ ~ arY~'1.1Dto~tovl~+~~'itee~ .
• pwaibla 1W
DISCUSSION TOPtCS
tcarrk~ edidoei. .ne eo+udem so ..tiebn conrwna)
DIVISION OF BUILDINGS 20MNG REVIEW (456-3675) QONTACT TOM DAVIS
s Wnttan commeats were pceparod & a ca,py given W tlo applisant.
* Sft of'ty►po IU landsca~eng o e+equirod aloag Meioer
s2Oft ofTypa L lahdscapiag is required eloeg Naith pnaperty line
• Submut lendscepung plen.
• Captlcato of Exaaiptton o required vvuh s eomplda aggreWam fom
ENGVMMG dt ROADS (456-3600) CONTACT DOUG HUSKO
• Wcittm oommenrs wem preparod 8t a ooPY 8iveaa tha epplwsat
• Sft dedic;ahon ts requured sloag Mamer Submit pmperty deed
• Traffic Study is e+equued to daamiae vatical/honwntel diasam Contm Davg 8usko regarQiag thts matter
s Road end draiaago plens ara required for Mamar
~
lEAL'['8 D1S1'RICT (324-IS60) OONTACT DARYL WAY
~ Ou-dte soptlc pumtt m required tvr ttas eita. Il eystam iu ovar 3.500 ptlans ooatacx ehe Stata Dapertaeeat o[ Healeh
~ Contw locel e+efusa campaoY reS,arding locetwo of dumpsta to eilow dunaram►d for thair vehtcles
s AU vonwticxion debrie must be tekea w a ticeased disposal fecitltp. ao oa-4nto bunuag or bunel wfll bo authonud
s Connect to public wuw
s Subaut a Ccctica! Matenels Listlag
,
FIRL DISPIiICT NO 1t328-246Z) CONl'ACP PAUL CHAS'I3
* 2 additionet fve hydreats are requu+ed for t6is srta Vaify IoeatwA of 3c+d exiaft hydrent
* A knox box ts required for earh butldiug
' nMMoN oF ev«unNcs pxAv RevIEw (06-3675) coKracr JuN MAscnKKno '
= wrdtea eommenta were pnperea & a eoPy 8iveo co tbe applicant
• For wtormauon oa the AmecKans ant6 Dtsebddees Act cell 1-800-435 7232
# Effedwe 4/1194 a[! eommercial pro)ects abell deanonatrete oompliaace arith tho Noa-Rosidential EnuW Code
• 6uildiag wdl roquue a miaimmn of 2 oxos
; Comdor m nsqnued to ba 1 lwur eoaatruehoa
; Submit a Cntical Matenels Gsting
SM AEMM FonPEMn aEr.EAW rWWAFMevrs
~
~
~
RECEIVED
REPORT OF 10/4l93 PRE-APP4iCA7'!ON 00 F ' (E 0 r~ ~ ~ 2 1995
1628 N Mamw - OMoe 8wldiag
SFOKME COUNrY EfdGINEER
JF srArs F- z~ ~ Mnrrg
1f~~W-i~IBB toload C3~e~t~tr Lift 8~, ~r~e 1 AU 992b~~ 90lM►74'MSI62 `~AC'1~0$ rnl[md ~ ~k. ~ WA 9~DZ f~►•T47-S16~' U~ ~Jim 8dncslBafne~ Ar~s 'W lookmood WA . 9liIpi M96898-7417 {
STA7E EIWIRONMENTA4 I.XCY Aa-MEN
Tho propo8al wes eeviewed by the Drvrswn of Buildings for aomplmnoo wab the S'sato Favitoomente! POolicy Aec it was decena&aed
that previouslY PrePared docucaente ead threshold detQrnauiatton aere adequete to avetude thts proposa! in accordeace with
WAC 197-11-600(Z) T6eBe docume,ras are oa file wncb the Oiwsmn of BuUdmge
PR0ILGT UVLRVI4W
Appfieaat proposes to coastnect Phase t uf this project wluch is 28.O00sq R of otfico arca. Tm wdU ooasut of 3 bwldings
(bwlding A 8 000 sg ft, budding &7,500 sq R, building C-12.M aq ft) Existtag hauses adl rumm on-stos natJ Phase U cs daveloped
Applicaat is eaticWsting a compleuon dat8 of Mey 1 1996
~MMARY QF PRQAOMD
I L
YAW Oww I" -
pAYAM, zaa~ ~4TUM T'i1FS ~ ffiln.DRl~'~tUu Ad'J~~ GROW v1tPE NWV WAYdSVlMVlSY=1pH6lt& ~ Y
i
•n~~oa~ s~ ~ ,~e ~ ' ..'s~oa~ea~a ~ vk saoo v~.ar~aae~~rw~t~r~~,e~oa
~ ~ -
• panRAe tW
DISCUSSION TOPICS
(alufrir.tbm s"dora. 014 can.otioro to wft" canma,al
' Dtvisiox oF Bw.Dnvcs zoriavG REVIEw (456-3675) coArTacr ToM Davts s
; Written comQeeats wwo Pnparcd & aeVY Sivea w the appiicaat
• SR of Type QI IanQscsping o sequered atoag Mema
?AR of'1ype I laadscagmg is requirod atong North property 1ine
s 3nbmit laadscspiag plen
= Certificate of 6xemptlaa m e+equuod ant6 s oomptete aggregattoa form
ENGIIVEERDNG & ROADS (456-3600) CONTACI' aouc Busxo
s Wnttea oomments wem preparod & a copy grvoa to tho applmant
• Sft dedteatwa IS cequjred along Mamer Subnut praperty deed
" TrafRe Study is requtred to detecmino vertecal/horizontal dlstaaca Contaat Daug B+rsko rcVcdmg thie mecmer
* Road sad dratnaga pleae are cequaod for Mamer
HEALTH DISTRICT 024-I360) CONTACT DARYL WAV
s On-she septic permit is reqwred for thu ede lf systcm m ova 3.5fl0 Saltons contm the Stm ikpenmeat of HcalW
s Cantact local refuse eotnpeny mgarding Iocatioa oi dwnpga, w altaw wroarouad for ttair vahkles
• AU constnesxion debris must be tataeu to a licroased dwposal fscU►ty ao on-stte buratag ar buriai wdl be authorized
• Caanect te publk wetar
a Subaut a Crlticel Materuals LAmng
~
FTItE DISntICT NO 1 (028-2462) CONTACT PAUL CHASE
~ 2 addtttoael fire hydreats are roquired for tlio sito Venfy locstion ot3rd oxistiag hydrant.
s A kaax box is requu+od for eacb bu,lding
DiVISION OF BtJILDiNGS PLAN REVMW (456-367S) CONTA(.°i' JUN NiASCARUO • Written oommeats aae prepared & a capy given to the spplmat
' For iaformatioo 0o the Amalcans wnh Dtsabdnws Act call 1 800-435 7232
; Effactrve 411l94 a!I eammercial projeas shalt dateoastrete canpimnee wit6 tha Naa-Res&fanttW Eaagy Code
s Budding wdl c+eqwre e mmuawn of 2 auats
Comdor is requutd to be 1 hour coAauctIon
Submit e Cntical Matenale Ltstng
SFE AFVMW FOR IMlT lFLEISSF /WU/AElNENTS
~
- PERMIT RELF.ASE RE(?UIRLMENTS
Pleaaa eubmlt sa►wvr (7j seta q frvvktd aiu dMw8e &,jd kmlizWe P&m Piw M+o R1 co*kte seta of cvnarrurdon drawdnga w
Ma Deparonent qf 8atAdfngs jor acbw*fdgeniaru and dlMbuton w a!l rhe aPPraprtota agmciea !n ondar, far dl ogusatea
&0cP9&d0UdY Pm"MY0WPrqJ~ ~k inRoMu rleat aubmtaot: tnatude au Atcasrary di,awtnga aKd ewwnmr: w tnarm
rliar reviaw RIYaurProJnt !s connpleted ln tke leaiv miwunt qjttme. Daeranwtr ahould ineludk b,dlding cddmu mrd kgal
dtmrlptlon olPropettY
Spakene County"e Projeat Review Coordbsetor wUl be Jutie 8hatto ei ehe 01v of BuUdinae 146648761
ZoNM Erron~r~ts MAt.tn FM stm.ocrraa
1 Suddlnhwt in dmm & foet X ^
2 Cu:btq nrouctQ lembula X
3 lExtener I he Idie+ectioa ot Uliuauneuon X 4 Bxtegor e+afusa areee + earee" X
S Fenca tocateaa: hcqj!~ Bt t~pe X
6 Leadsa of parktag iot X
7, S fau 1,pe ID landwAqo aboig Memr X
8 ZO fat'EVe I landseaeo dang Nos6 ro Uae X
9 1.aodsaeqLlw (loaatian Tocies, siw) ~ X
10 Pnrkiag asells (aumbcr.jedM. dinumsion, dIrecttonal scenwa) X
t l Pavug, - X
12 Setbaoks a(
13 Drataep/slope of toarnq doct ead/or mot's x l ,
14 Oramale piea (ewalas drvapalta. eatauladaus) X l
~ IS Dnvaareys &iU coad agpemQes X ~
16 3aQtuio teag/drajnfiaid toaQtcoa & eme X I I
i? Fire hvdmots (tooatwa dt aumbet) X
18 Hacud rkina se!!a & seccma uno $witbia b1d 7t ,
19 AllEpte tha pamals iato 1pem! 7C
20 Cett,ficata of Bnemgtion X
21 , Ier~atiaa "stem pIares X
22 Neuaerv edenete X ~
23 Ape+eemesu to pav few & nunimum recuu+aaems list X
?A AMoech penmt 8or aoceas to canuv e+oada 7C
?S Reaordad propety dad X
26 Rsght of cvsy dedisatcoa X
27 iRoad plans X '
28 lcmw Matcetals Gst X X
29 On-ata eawep doposal s"tetn peemit ~
30 Look (Kirox) box entry svstem farm X
31 Spectal iunecteoa fornns ~ X
32 S mi 1NREC Pfau tor ~ X-
~
33 ~8ae+~iet-Free Re4uh+~ NVAC 51 Z0) 7t
34 &nerg dctuta%Alculeboas X
as Efeatu~e. v=Wbkuoa dt air eonatd" arewu,gs ` r x '
36 ~Plumbuq datoile ~ X
37 SeQaractcn wau aetails X
38 , Swcwral dceauw wuh wd sten~s 8t ~utata ~ , X ~
n re of Coordinator - Signeture of Plen Revrewer
Project No
R
~
Page 1
OFFICE OF THL COIINTY ffiJGINFEIt
SPORANS COUNTY, WASHINQ►TON
Project Inland Office Park Date 10/4/95
Address N 1628 Mamer Ref No B95147
Parcel No 45104 0202 Review # Pre App
The County Engineering Department has completed a review of
the above referenced project The following a.nformation must be
provided in order for us to proceed with our review
A) A drainage plan for the site shall be prepared in
compliance with Spokane County "Guidelines for Stormwater
Management" At a minimum the plan must contain
1 Drainage calculations for stormwater volumes
generated on site
2 Calculations for total impervious surfaces
contained within the site
3 Finished grade elevations for structures to be
constructed on site
4 Copy of the proposed landscape plan
5 A typical croes section of the 208 swale
6 Calculatione to justify the number and type of
drywells proposed
7 Elevation of drywell inlets where applicable
8 Finished grade elevations at the top and bottom of
the 208 swale
B) The subject property is affected by the "Findings and
Order" and the "Conditions of Approval" for the following
land use action
Spokane County Zone Change No ZE 84-81
County Engineere conditions include
1 Dedication of 5' for R/W on Mamer Submit a copy of the
recordqd property deed to begin this process
2 Conatruct eurb and additional paving on Mamer
Due to euebstaat3al modlficatloaa In the uee of the parael
fion the approved zone chaage s-ite plan, the Coun ty Eng3neer8 are
reque8ting the eubmtittal of a traff.ic saalye3e for thfs propoeal
reeo-ot ,e, s g ~ &--.L t , c~.r-✓-~.
~ Gt cl f
a.~
/
Page 2
C) You must submit road and dsainage plans for street
improvements These must be prepared by an
engineer Plans must be prepared for the following
etreets
a Mamer Road
All required construction (eidewalk/curbing/pavement) within the
Public Road Right of Way is to be completed prior to the release
of a building permit or a financial guaranty in an amount
esta.mated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of
construction or improvements shall be filed with the County
Engineer Required plans are to be submitted prior to estimating
the amount of the financial guaranty or permit release
Approach permits must be obtained, after a eite
plan has been approved, and before the isauance of
a building permit, from the County Engineering
Department for any new or improved driveway
approaches to the following streets
a Mamer Road
D) Insufficient infortnation wae submitted with the proposal
We are unable to proceed with our review We will need
the following before we can proceed
1 Site Plan
2 Drainage plan ae apecified
3 Other information
a A parking and traffic circulation plan shall
be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The
deaign, location and arrangement of parking atalls shall be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Paving as
required by the County Planning Ordinance, will be required for
any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles It is illegal to back out onto the Right of Way
E) Utility Condition Permittee is responsible for arranging
for all necessary utility adjustments or relocation as
required for completion of the improvement
F) The owner of the property ar the authorized
representative must complete and sign Spokane County
Engineers "Agreement to Pay Fees" This document muat be
returned to the County Engineers Office Plan review will
not be completed until this document is executed This
w
~
Page 3
document is attached to theae comments Please return
the completed Agreement to your contact person at the
Engineers Department
The applicant or their representative is responsible far
including each item that ie marked "Required By Thia Pro3ect" in
their eubmittal in accordance with the checklist deecriptions
Each item aubmitted that is to meet the checklist shall be
checked off by the applicant or their representative Submittals
which do not conform to the above requirements will be returned
for further items with no review being accompliahed This will
prolong the review process If changes occur in the requirements
for the pro]ect becauee of further conversations with Spokane
County representatives, please attach a note explaining the
agreed upon change in requirements When the applicants'
submittal is finally approved, the Engineers department will
release their portfon of the Building Permit
Your contact person at the County Engineering Department is
Doug Busko, 456-3600
r
r
STATEMENT QfF AGREFMNT
INawd Constructton Compraay, a Amstoa at SFBrU Cacpomoa, d the etase WmhngLon ("SFONSOR')
has erttaed iato a ooattaRxual agteoma vvO ! RDom= PAlineenng (`ENGxAIE$R")
fbr a oansuu~caon enoneering aennces ft Ialand Comnoce Par&, Spolcane Camty Ptojecx #1393147
1 The minims►m sooye dthm oonetrnctson eo$lneeting servlcas includes, but 3s not Ltnited to
A) Da31y abdetvahon and tepm,eg of consuuctioa ecth+Ihes on this pMect,
B) Ma=at~nanQe of aU oonatnset=on tecords re!ffied to tWs project. to mc]uk but not timited to
da4 wspo*on reporK maaidadote'e oett~f'icadoAs matenai test reporta„ aaA aonrespmdeaee
C) Aseuraece that the cmtruaflon of tbe roads and Wurtanant dmnage fooLtiea 3a acootebng
to the eerti5ed and W6ved Ptans aoxpedby the SPakan Cow►tY FWnw SPolcaue CawntY
Connty Genesal P+rcnnsions the Stanftd SpecOcaban4 ana apPhcable Pofion ofthe WSDOrI'
Ccast~uc~on Manual
D) Stalang and I~donwntatanon
E) Dev+elopment of Retord Dtawiogx and
P) Testiqg of emustructwa tpataWe for oompflance to the plars aooepted by th0 Spokane Gounty
Enuneer SP*ane ConatY General Provssions, the Standazd Spectflcaaoaa. and appluoWe
pcruons of the WSt70rT Consvucaoa Manoat
All acmdiag oo the ediUon of the "Spekane County StanBards tos Road and Sewu Construction"
gover=uog tlus pioject
2. Piior to acceptaace of the toads aad drunap fsalities by Spokane Cauft the Engineet shail subnut
all mnsuudfoa reoords aacl tbe Reoord DraaaW to tbe Spekane Cmuty Bngrnoer
3 Tho totel esumatod cost of the Consttpcdan EnWnearft SstvIces for ttus prvject 3s $2000 00
jcbondoc
,
Dated du9 7 day of 1199 4i
Inland Construcuon Company
A Waslunston Cotpotation
- it C~ ~
<:Op Pres,dent
~
STATB OF WASHNGTON )
) ss
Cmmty of Spokane )
I certify that Y loeow or hsve sabsfadory evEdenoe thatr~:S c., aLgm soej Is
the person vvho appeared beE'ote me and dat said person acknowledged that he signod dus
tnstnunent, en oath stated that the utfonnatton aonEauied tn t?us tnstniment ts factual end ac,t7urate~
and lhat he was audhonz0d to execute dus mstrumeni, arid atknowledgad it as the Presidatit of
Nariey C Doupjass, Ine, a Waslwqpn Corporauon, to be the 1're+e and votunEary acx of said
cotporatton fot the uses And putposes Uieran mendoned in the uutruunart
I3ated tlus ~day oE ff~j z , 199 (O
NOTARY PUBLIC ut and, for the State
of Waslnngton tegcLng at
hfY aPPoirriment eupires
~'G~j►~r~I~,~
~rQ~~e
• .
Dated ths Z day of JA ` 199 o
~
Eng~eenog
J.R. Honaett
By R;;rctpal
Jay R. Bo stt STATE OF WA3HIINGTON )
) ss
County of Spakane )
I oertifY that i knaw or Lave sausfactory evidenco thai idti.vc is
the persoa who appeared before me, and that smd persoa ackrnoPwledged he ngned ttus in~trumen~ on
oath etated t6at the Mfornation contmned m ttus mstniment is &ctual aad accurate and that he was
authonzed to execute this msirument and acknawledge it as the Pnncspal af J R Bvnnett Engmeerng,
to be the free aad voluntary act af said comFanY, for the uses and purposes therein menrioned in the
instiument
~
Dated dus day of -.,-J ~ ,1991~
NQ'00-
!L ~ N PUBLIC tn and for the State
Cl-
*0
4D"- of wastwgon, resiaing at . e~~... S(►~ Kr~~t
T~ r ~
~ u~tment ~ ~
~ Pues
~m Y ex
~ apftBl.tG M
191
O~1 11 0~
~
( ~ .
$ ~ r
wo
co
r°
'v`
~ ~ ~
, ~ ri► i ~
• ~ ~ ~ w , ~
. ~
. ~ ~ ► ~ M _ i
~ ~ ~ , ~
• , ~ ~ N a►
s.
a ~
.
► ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ o
~ ' H + N
~ ~ ~ ~
~ w
~ 1 ~
~ ~ r ~ ~ ~
~ .
H ~ 46%
, ~ ~ ~
► ~ ~
~ ~ , ~ ~ . $ ~
4 tAl
1 , ~ r
~ t
• ~e ~ ~ ~ ~ •
.
REI.IANCE SURETY COMPANY RELLANCE INSURANCE C4MFANY
LTNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY RELIANCE NATIONAL IINDENIlNITY COMPANY
~
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFlCE PHILADE4NHI4, PENNSYLVANIA FUWER, OF A►TTORNEY
KNOW ALL NlEN BY TFIESE PRESF.NTS, thw RE1.FAN4E SUFtETY COMPANY is a caa~t~orsdon duly or+88t~iaed u~'~der the lews af the Statg of Oel
aware ertd ihat AE~,IANGE 1NSUFtAf1tCE COMFAN~ and UNtTEb PACIFIC INSUAANCE C'AMPANY are oor'poretions dufy organfzed uridet the lews
of the Commvrnveaith of Pennsylvanla and that AELlANCE NATtONAL iNDEMNtTY COMRANY )s a corporation duly organized tmder the laws ot
the Stote of Wisconsin therein cO1lecOvely ca1Ced 'the,Cpmpantw`! and Oat the ComQaaies %virlue of stAnat+ue and seats do hsreby make
aot~stit~tte and appaint Cerla Nolt, Georga C Sohtoed~. Linda Tfchsy Joanna tarn~rni Wm neen. Lds steM►arc chdstine L trenoi, w w
WeRer Rlchard W MerrlD of Spokane Wesh1ngton tt►eir tnte and lawful Attarney(s)-in-Fact, tQ meke execute seai and deliver for and on thetr
behalf, and as their act attd deed attd etl bands and undsr~ekings ot sura~fyship ~d to bind the Companies thereby es fulty and to the seme
extont as if such bands artd urtdertas and dther writi~s ~phlteatory M the ~re thereof ware s~gred by an Erc+ecubve Officer of the Companies
and sealed and ett~estsd by one other ot,~t~ch offiaers, a~f hereby ratiftes end conftinns alt thet thefr sacd Attomeytst-in-Fact may do In pwrsuance
hereof
This Power af Attorney~ is granta¢ undar and Ry the authadW t:f Arti~e Vfl of the By-Laws of RELiANCE SURETY COMPANY,
AEIJANCE INSURANCE COMPAAIY UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE CO PANY, and REUANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY wtuch
provislons eire naw tn fmq force end effact, readlRg as follow~
ARTM Va acEamoH oF 130Ms Aro vNoWraKaW
1 tM 9wd ot akeecom ft PraqwnL Oe Chalm+en 01 dn 8aat0 Wny Stnfot Vlas PteslAeelL MN Vtoe PeddWt bt AXWZM Vtes PresiQSrtt a aclet 4Maar deganatad tU ti+o eaard at
Olrectoro dW bavs power and euthor[eY to 48) aPPOlnt AtCotrleyW4n-Fset tlmd to autfwdto tfiam to Lvmte ae balsW af ltre Conpenir ba~s md undmuklnia. reaognttaretm ca+vocts af bwmnNN
ana akhm wrtdrgs eblgatm m aeemae etenct and tb) co rignove any.ueh J1mantsyt*4n-F= at imy tkmo ar*nnvofce dee povwp' w►d qjdwiry ofvb++ roOwn.
Z AttoneYiaH(nfsCt ahalt ha++e paMw en0 uthoWh► abjm to dW tenits oti (ifiltaftapi at ft PqWet' at Attumm1► tsWedto tl+an, to +bmmo delfvei on OaAe1f of the Compam► WnOs
tW umderaklrtsc racoprdwms* aaarneat of bx4i+ni4v end arNibr wdftp abOboNfY ktohe rowe tharptJf Thp qopwsm sW brm noftsry tot Me vati6itY af aw 1 14 ered wMe1tatGn9a.
reoop*wwm aontram ot bWfflrtnhv and olhe► wettMps wtpt" 0 dee natvre pawf
S Attcq*YWan-Fed aW he►ne Pawar and wthantY to eocecuGO affidarib tnWiVad to Qo 040ed to b011436 f9G0pnts%=M COfMM af WOmMty at othw COUROurud at oeltPtwY
undert+lklikas e~d thW aW atao havs power anM wdoill► to awW the tfruincte atweR+m+i of Ms Camganr vtd to coplgs ot the By4aws of ft Caapmy a eev attttte at setttmn tReteft
Tfis Phwu ot Attarmy ia signed snd saafed by facsb11Do ungmt erd by nutlwql Wthe faUowtnp tftodidam adeitted by the Exscuttwe snd Rnanoe Cammftes of the Boarda o! 0lreatan of RWtence
bturanoe CanOvw UWted Padfia MWaaae CotnpM snd P4anoa NaooW hiStbmrhll Compum Oy VrmmwA Camm dsted as ot FeDnml► 28 1984 and bY tfw Lveadve wW FlnsnQht
Commtttee 01 d*8owda! tiirestwa b! RdarimSuretY ConRm1► bY UIaltnous CoASeat datad ss af (Nenh 3I 1994
Rouhed thnt the ofOneRm a! s4ch d1tO;Ms and offlon an0 tMf sW of ft Campmhr msf► bo ~ to an1► axh Pbwar of Aaomay a arry ceNRcace~ rolaft there[o OY
faobna•~va am► am1► Rower of Attamay ea oeranasue baadtro auo►+ to=b0ue sigraftarrs ar heslmiro ..d s1m0 es v.ad sne e' dinp uoOn aso conryan+► wa any .ucI+ Pnvvm ao
oxqamd snd oaOrled bY facptffte slpnnwes end fecelmas sedshel1 bs valbd aW bhWbg uw Uee Canm+Y M Ne tuturo w4h respen to anY boW or un6waldna m whkR h!e
ataahed.•
lN WITWESS WHEREOF, the Companlas have caused these presents to be stgned and thetr corporete seals to be hereto affixed this February 13
1896
' 1tSLi4NCfi St)RBTY COMPANY
R8LlANCE.IIVSURAIVCE C41ViPANY
~ ~ ~ UNT19?D PACIF3C INSURANCE COMPANY
REI.IANCB NATIONAL DtDEiVINITY COMPANY
*w• 1 Mi ~ . ~
STATE OF Washfngtan }
COUNTY OF King )ss
On this Febtuary 13,1996 baefore me Janet Blankley personally appsared tawrence W Cadstrom who acknowl8dged himsetf to be the Sernor
Vice frestdent of the Regwca Suroty Companyr 8nd the Vica Pmsfdert of ftetiarx~e Insuuance t~mpany tJnlted Pacifc tnsurenc;s Compa , and
KD
Reliencs Nedanat fndemnhy Company and that as such being iuthoraed ta do so, eKecuted the foregoirtg mstrument for the purpose erein
~ aontabned by sEgnlrtg the nams of the corporetion by hlmsetf as its dufy oulborized officer
In wiMess whereof, 1 hereunto set my hand and officfaf seal QLA. \
1
10 (130 Not PubSc in and for the State ot Wasn
Reatdi at Puyaqup ~
1 Robyn Lslmg, Assistant Secretary of RELfANCE $URETY COMPANY aEUANC.E INSURaNCE COMPANY UNtTED PACIFIC IPISURANCE COMP
ANY, and RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMIVITY COMPANY do hereby cerdfy that the above end toregoing is a Vue and coaect copy of the Power
of Attorney executed by said Companies, which is still ln futl fotce and effect
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set a►y hend and affixed dis seels of said Companies this 3RD day of JULY 19 96
7 Eq ♦
~s
o Asststanc Se~etatY
' . ~ E
; y►)0&0
_ .
~ ~
i ~ • • ~ ~ •
nvLAND . ~
CONSTRUC'I`ION COMPANY WETTEM OF U1Q9S0N0cTU&[L
A Divlsion of S F& D Corp
102 E. Sprague Avenue
SPOKANE, WA 99202
(509) 747 5162 DATE JOH NO FAX (509) 624 2251
TtpN
TO ze~ Cc. Q-• ~ ~ ~ _
RE
WE ARE SENDING Y9P,-a%ttached 0 Under seRarate cover vla the following Items
~ Q' Shop drawings a Prints Q Pians O Semptes d SpeciflcaNons
Copy of letter O Change order Q
COPIES DA.~TE NO OESCiiIPf'ION
2~~ ~ ~ ~r~.~► C~ Sz.. , .
C-- . RECEIVED ~
JUL D g '696
~
, SFOAcy~ ~1rANEER ~
~
THESE AFiE TRANSMITTED as checked belovw
d For approval 0 Approved es submitted 11 Resubmft cvpies for epproval
0 For your use O Approved es noted ❑ Submit copies for disMibuVon
~
~
0 As requested C] Returned for corrections 0 Return correoted prints
L-1 For review and comment CI
Cl FOR BIDS DUF 19 0 PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TQ US
REN9ARKS ~
~ ~ .
/1►L`'~~~+°`~
COPY TO - SIGNEO
Mo11Cr~ 1AIN91at,~nV+s.04n roataerMMtMufM Mo-US ll anetoauredere nof 06 nored kfaBly notJryn us at onaQ. ~
RBAL PROPBRTY COVBNANT
A3'D AGR:3EMENT
.
WHERBAS 9pokane County has embarked on a wastewatezt/sewage collection and treatment progracri
and haa adopted a Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan for the purpose among others, of the o'
present and future protection of drinking water serviaes including, but not limited to, the
Spokane Valley-Rathdrum 8rairie Sole Source Aquffer--in parts of Spokaae County--from the effects
of pollution by exieting and future sewage disposal practices in areas which may affect the
aquifer,
THI3 AaREEMENT AND CO is made and executed this day of J-Q Nit-_ ,
19 4 Cp_ by m6r ff f2 rz 10 pZ- e~- Z rj--~ 1~{c. , Immop.
as owuer (s) of the following described real property located in the Statw& N,n~, Couraty
of Spokane, to wit
s c~ t4--~_ t~~~ F..~~ t~~scp r/ o°V ~
JUN 1 1996
DIVISION OF BUIL,pINp ANp pZqNNiNG
which property is located within an 3.ncorporated city or town, seweiPYtlistrict or area within the
Waetewater Management Area deeignated as urban, suburban, commercial or industrial (as identifaed
in Spokane County's adopted Comprehensive Plan), and who as owners have or through their
authorized agent have, made a eewage permit application to Spokane County Health District, in
accordance with Title I, Eavironmental Health, Chapter 4, Rules and Regulations for Sewage
Dispoeal Systems for Spokane County, adopted by the Soard of Health of the Spokane County Health
Diatrict January 19, 1995 e%
1 Oblicration In accordance with Section 1 04 110 (7), of said regulations, the Owners hereby
covenant and agree for themselvea, their heirs, aucceasora, assigns, and personal representatives
to join in any valid petition for the formulation of a Local Improvement District or Utilities
Local Improvement District for the inatallation, maintenance, and operation of sewer service and
facilitiee which may be proposed to be established fcr the area fn which the above-descriksed
property is located, and which will aerve the above-described property, and said Ownera for
themeelvee, their heire, eucce8sors, asaigns and personal repreaentatives covenant and agree not
to protest the establiahment of aay such Local Improvement District or Utilities Local Improvement
District for auch area aad aervirtg eaid property whether proposed by petition ar by resolution of
the approgriate governmental agency, PROVIDED, XOwEVER, this obligation shall not constitute a
waiver of aay right of the eaid 4wnera, their heirs, successors, assigns or pereonal
representativea to object to or to protest the amounts established by assessment lists proposed
or adopted for auch Local Improvement District or Utilities Local Improvement DiBtrict as applied
to the above-described property
2 Cov_epant The obligation and agreements hereinabove contained are hereby declared to be
covenanta runafng with the above-described land and shall be bindfng upon the Owners, their heirs
succeaeore, asaigns and pereonal representativea for the benefit of the above-described lands a.nd
eurrounding lande which may be included in such a district
The Owners shall pay upon delivery of thia agreement to the Spokane County Health District
the fee for recording this agreement and covenant with the Spokane County Auditor
OWNER OWNER L---\
Signature Signature
Owuer,l ei8ueinesa' Addreas P-d• $ ~ !''f ~ "v~~ ~ Pt9 k_*4 K~ C~ 7 `f -O'?'a~
~
USINOLE []MARRIED (Both peraons must aign thie document even if only one person owns the
property
Above-deecribed property has NO lienholdera, contract sellera, mortgagors, deed of
truet holders, or other partiea of veated interest except those whose aignatures
are ahown above
]A/ Co '
Da e OR ig ture of dwner .
~
, We hereby coasent to ve agreemeat and covenant
~
Date Lioesi2tSner/Contract Seller/Mortgagor/Deed of Trust hrOttler . (Signature, title, and company)
~
►ecepted in accordance with Spokane County Health District Rules and Regul,ations for Sewage
Aapesal Syetems, adopted January 19, 1995, as a condition for xsaua.sig 3CHD permit
' thie day of , 19
BY
ua~z~q• Health Offzcer, Spakane County Health District
!T~
_ ;A,L PROPERT'Y CO~NT AND AGREE ~1T
.
` . ~ .
0
STATE OF WA9H N )
~ SS Individual Acknowledaement
Caunty of 9pokane )
I, the undersigaed, a Notary Pub n and the above-named county and state do hereby
certify that oa thie day of 19 ,
pereonally appeared before me aad kn=?tarly e the in dual(s) described in and who executed the
within iastrument, as a free and act and dee , or the uses and purposes these,.n
mentioned
OIVEN under my Ysand ficial seal the day and year last writt ove
LS
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, ~
reeiding at
My commission expirea
STATE OF WASHINt3TON )
) SS Corcoration Ackncwledaement
Couaty of Spokane )
I, the underaigned, a Notary Public in and for the above-named county arnd state, cio hereby
certify that on thie day of -t~ , 19,,,~ C~ =Z Q~S L- t: L -S pj/
peraonally appeared beEore me and known to be the ez"[ T of the corporatio-
that executed the within and foregoing inatrument, and acknowledged sasd instrument to be the free
and voluntary act and deed of said corporation, for the uses and purposes there3.n merationed, and
on oath etated that he was authorized to execute said instrument and that the seal affixed is the
corporate eeal of said corporation ir 111f Ill~~
GIVFN under my haad & official seal the day and year last written a0~<
0~~~.rF ~
LS z2 o _
Notary Public in and for the State of Waehing It,'~'
~
reaiding at ,S~~Y~+/~ "
My commiseion expirea 3/ r► ~
~'~►'~f'it `~il
~
STATE OF WAS~'~S ON )
) 3S Partnershin Acknowledaement
County of Spokane )
I, the undereigned, a Notary Publ and for the abo amed county and state, clo hexeby
certify that on thie day of
pereonally appeared before me and who proved to it tiafactory evidence tv be the persons
dho executed the within inBtrumeat on beha f the partners nd acknowledged to me that the
2artnership executed it
t3IVEN under my hand & of al seal the day and year last written abo
JD
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
residing at
My commiseion expires
~TATB OF WAS$INt;TON )
) gg Health Officer's Acknowledaemex4t
'ounty of Spokane ) -le I
I, the underefgned, a Notary Public Zn and for the above-named cosnty and state do hereby
ertify that on this day of , 19
►ereonally appeared before me and known to be the xealtta Officer for the Spokane County Health
iiatYict that executed the within and foregoing inatrument, and acknowledged said instrument to
oe the free and voluntary act of said Health District, for the usea and purposes therein
entioned, and on oath stated that he was authorized to execute said instrument
OIVEN under my hand & official aeal the day and year last written above
S •
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at
My commiaBion expirea
i4/3/g•
~ ~ 1
1618 N Memer Roed, Trect 97, EXCEPT the South 475 Feet thereoFt
=end also EXCEPT all thet pert thereoF lying northerly oF a line
drawn parallel with e distence 100 Feet southerly when measured
et ri$ht engles From the center line oF primery State Highwey Nv
2t VERA. acoordinq to plat recorded in Volume "O" oF Plats, pege
30, 3n Spokane County, Washington
Parcel A
Zhe North 270 feet of the South 475 feet of the West 200 feet of Tract 97, VERA,
aaoording to Plat reoarded in Volwme "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane Gounty,
W ,
ElCG'EPr Mamer Road
Parvel B:
Zhe South 475 feet of Ttact 97, VERA, aooor+dug to Plat reoorded in Voltme "O"
of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane Cmity, Washfngton,
F~{CEPT the West 200 feet of the Notth 270 feet thereof;
AL90 EXCEP'r that part thereof lyug Sauthwesterly of the Na ly lim of
the corbin Ditch right of way as same now exists over and across said Ttact 97,
AND ALS0 ECCEP'r Mamer Road
l
~
230567
- 2 -
~ r
i .
J.R. BomvETTENGvvEEmwG
~
GIV1L & STRUC'1'URAL FIJGINf.eltlNGlcONSULTING
93Ub N ,W,0YPORT ffldHt~AY
sPOKAAC cVA 99218
(509) 468-7626
i
DRA/NAGE STUDY
of
~
~
INLAIVD COMNIERCE PARK
Spokane WA
br
OFF1CtAL PUBUC DOCUMEN7
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGiNrER S OFFiCE
0 &NA. -
PAOJECT # 'I
SUBMlTTAL #
RMRM TO OUN!3VE~GlNEER
wo
/NLAND CONSTRUCT/ON )Q, ~F ~►sy~
SPOKAW WASH/NGTON ~
3M3
Ct~T
~s
MAY 1996 NAL
g6
JRBE Job No 86124
~o. r . q ~ ~v w.v . _ . .
/
INLAND COMMERCE PARK
DRAINAGE STUDY
JRBE J09 NO 96124
6/12/88
IINPERVIOUS AREA
BASIN Street Length Street Area _ Misc Area Resid Imperv Total Ana
1 ~ 0 29,30) 0 _I~~~) - , --(~OZ) - - 29 (ftA
'
,300
2 0 11085 0 0 27,085
3 0 13,910 0 0 13,910
4 0 11027 0 0 11027
TOTAL 0 81,322 , 0 0 81,322
1
AVLAND C06949RCEPARK
atAMwGEsnror
JRBE Joe Ho 9812e
artL96'
I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I ( I I I I I I I li I I I I 1 I - 1 I ~
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PARAMETERS ~
-
BA51N TOtALAREA tkPEAV AREA dYERUWDFLOW IGUTTER FiAUN I TOTALFt01M BAMN
r ,
fM2 Aetoe h 2 Ac►es Cl L1(A) 474~ Sl() l1(8) N1(8) S1(B) *0,1 L 21 22 n o A(LMk) NfP(llnk) R ~ V TcaL/II Dapth O-V'A TC{toten I(Unkj CNnk1 CaCPA
1 7 .066 8 17~ 79.300 8 0 0 005 E - 6.Q0 I Q b 1H 0.02 1 0873 1 a 2.61 1 1 ~ 0. V 7S8 " 10t i 1
2 A 29085 I 081 ~.~D a0 D 0 I 04 0 600 I Oa16 0,0¢ 740 I 8i2i 0081 If 247 2~ 288 1 02
3 1 3S 13,9/0 0Q01 0 04 0 99 B,GO 0.016 20d - C.ITB 0A2~ 318 0.~4 3
a t 025 1 t 6 1
092
ii~~ a NOTE 0
see ~eu~,t cakmm,05 i mae 6d~amMan I I - I I r I_ I I I I I I I I I I I i I
6
~
f
~
I
1
l
2
~
80WSTRIN43 METHOD (TEN YEAR BTORM DESI0m pRpJECT 98124 TIME OF CONCEIdTRATION (minutes)
DETENTION BASiN DE,910ti BA8(N 1
REIAEWER MCAB To (overlend) Tc (guftr) Areas 'C' A C
NUMBER OF ORYWELLS PROPOSED OATE 22dMay98
0 SIRgI@ (lypo A) 1 DouOlO (iypa 9) Ct a 015 L2 s 158 112 010 0111958
Totef Atea (cak.) (ae N1) 179 Z1 a 50 0 87 090 0NW12
Tbne olCom (eaka (ses H1) S 00 L1(1) = 0 Z2 ~ 8 0 00 0 00 Q
ca~~(calc) (am HI) 040 N(A) e 04 ea o 000 000 0
Ttme of Cone (mi+) soo s(A) Q oaos na 0016 000 000 0
Area t~~ 179 s a 002 000 000 0
C Facta 040 Tt (I) a 0 00 d a 01188 0 00 0 00 0
Sbeet Area (sq R) 29340
MVervwjs Area (s1 M) 29300 Total A Comp C
vonm Provaea 208 1336 sto►n► 144e li (e) 3 o Te (Ou) 0 101 179 040
Oulflow (eft) 1 N(B) = 04 Ta(A+B) p 000
Area C Fada 0 72 S(8) = 0 GaC I Aa 2 28
MCC= Tq(tot) a 500 Q(esl.) Q 2 21
91 02 i3 04 05 06 07 Tc (B) a 00 Intenady = 316
TiIft@ Thlto bIt8n8i1y Q 48Y V le V OIR SZONBO q a 0$732$2
Ino fno Re9 d) WP a 9-"W
fmin1 (sec) (tnfir) (CFS) (cu 1`0 (cu R) (eu ft.) R,* 00882
(A C~ (Outf V2) P"(1) V a 2 60
CMC"M===== ~ ~ Tc (tokQ o Tc (overla" + Ta (guqar) Tc(gu) = 101
5 00 30000 918 228 811 30000 817 Tc (ovelend) n Ct'(L1 NlSA0.5)"0 8} a(est) ~ 2 27
Cta0 15
S 300 318 228 911 300 617 L1= Longtlh ot Overland Flow Hald(ng = 5 63
10 8Q0 2.24 161 1128 600 518 N a hletlon faetot of overtartd Oow (4 tor everago gress cover)
15 SDO 177 127 11272 900 372 S= avemga slope o1 overlend flaw
20 1140 145 144 1354 1200 154 Ta (guttar) = Lenglh (R.)11lelacNy (RJsec )180
25 1500 121 0.87 139D 1500 110 B a Bokom vWdth of guttar or diC¢h
30 1so0 104 075 1418 1800 -381 Zi a inverse of erosa slope ane of dfth
35 2100 4.81 0 85 1437 2100 -663 Z2 Q Imrom of amss slopa Mro oI ditch
40 2400 0,82 0,5, 1412 2400 -928 d a daplh ot ftow In guaer (esdmate cheek esflmate wfth Flowl
45 2700 0 74 0.53 1481 2700 -1218 Area a d'B+d"212'(Z1+Z2)
50 3000 088 048 1513 300 1481 Wettedperimeter= 8d+(11sin(eb(1R1))+t/dn(otn(11Z2))?
55 3300 0 84 0 46 1582 3300 1738 Flydmuik Radlua = R= ArealWett~ad Perimeter
so 3600 061 044 1820 9800 1880 Velo* =1A881n R" 881's" 6
65 3900 060 0 43 1722 3900 2178 Flaw a Velocily'Area
70 4200 OSS OA2 1790 4200 2410 n- 0 016 for asphalf
75 4500 0 58 0 40 1848 4500 2651 s- IongiEudlnal slope ot gutter
80 4800 0.53 038 1884 46W 2936
85 5100 0.'S2 0.37 1940 5100 -3160
90 5400 0.50 0.36 1919 5400 .3421
95 5700 OA8 0.35 2039 5700 -3691
100 6000 0 48 0.34 2101 6O0 ~
- aa~a~a ~ ctctccmc~ 92CCCCCtC0zCn= ~aa a~aa~aa
ow+INwoE PONo Ca.cuu►troNs
RequbW 9nmY swab Pond doMe vohime
s impervlais Area x S in112 tnJR a 1221 au R.
pmvlded 1336 au R. OKI
ORYVIIELL RECUfREMENTS 10 YEAR DESfGN STORM
Mw9mum staage mquired by 8owatring ■ 1017" Qu R
provlded 1448 w R OK!
Numbor ond type of Drywelb Required o 0 Single 1 Qauble
3
BOWStRINO METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESfON)
PRWECT 98124 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minuEes)
00 EMI01V BASpV DE31t3P1 MAMW 2
REUIEVIIER MCM Te (oveftnd) TC (gutter) qreas C q C
NUMBER OF ORYVYELLS i~tOPOSED DATE 42-ft.W
t srrgfo OypoA a ooubieftW e) ct= 015 L2 o 423 017 010 0016828
Tolal Area (ealc )(we H1) 079 tt a SO 0 82 090 0.559647
Time of Conc (calc )(see H1) 5 00 Li (A) - o Tl a 8 000 000 0
Canposte "C' (calc )(swHt) 0 73 N(A) - 04 Be 0 0 00 000 0
Tlme of Canc (ndn) S 00 S(A) = 0005 na 0 016 0 00 000 0
Ams (Acm) 0 79 s= 0 02 0 00 0 00 0
C FactO► 0 73 Tc (A) s 0 00 d= 01626 0 00 000 0
Sftd Ama (sq R) 27085
M"Mma Ams isq IQ 27085 Total A Comp ~C
Votume Prov(ded 208 1309 storm 1569 L1(B) ~ 0 Tc (gu) 0 2 87 0 79
Outiaw (cie) 03 N(B) a 04 Tc(A+B) = 0 00
Area C faetat 0S8 S(8) a 0
22 ~,~e 64 05 ~ ~T Te a Tc(tot) = 5 Ofl 4=C 1 A= 183
(8) Time Time Irtter~ly C dev V In V out SDorgge ~ 0 0 Intenshy
Qfest.1 o 162
Ine Inc Req d)
(min) (sec ) Qnfir ) (da) (cu R) (cu R) (cu R.) A m `0.7AM
(01 80) (A'C'03) (OuMV't) {05-M WP
Te (iotaQ = To (overland) + Te (gulter) R a 00812
S 00 300 00 318 183 737 9000 647 Te (overland) = Ct'(L1 NIS"0.5M 6) V~ 2 46
Ct a 015 Tc(gu) = 2 81
S 900 318 1.89 737 80 647 L1 a Leeglh o10Veltaid Fla1Y Q(ast) ° 182
10 600 224 1.29 908 180 726 N~ iridion factor of averland flaw ( 4 tor everage gress caveo
15 900 177 1.02 1022 270 752 S~ averagQ stope of overland flaw Holding = 1507
20 1200 1 A5 0 84 1088 360 728 Te (guCer) = Length (R)1Ualoaiiy (Rlso )f60
25 1500 1.21 0 70 1117 450 687 B= Bottom widtli of guaot ot dbh
30 1800 1.04 060 1140 540 600 Z1 = inverse of crags slopo one of ditch
35 2100 0.81 0.52 1155 830 525 Z2 a illvefso olqOSS stOpe 1Mo oidiECfl
40 2400 0,82 0 47 1182 720 482 d o depth of Ilow In gutCar (esUnmte, chedc esynnate wlth Floo
45 2700 0 74 049 1195 800 385 Area a d'8+d"212 (Z1+Z2)
SO 3000 086 039 1215 900 315 Wef6BdpeliltletOr aB d+(11sin(eb1(121))+1Isf11(efi(122)I)
55 3300 0 64 0.37 1258 990 m Mydrau8e Redlss a R a MealWeftod Pedmeer
80 36QO 0 61 0.35 1901 1080 221 VelocNy a 14881n'R" 881's" 5
BS 3904 0 60 0.35 1984 1170 214 Ftow a Velceity'Area
74 4200 0 58 0,33 1438 1260 178 n a 0 016 far asphatt
75 4500 0 56 0.32 1465 0350 135 s= longitudinal slope ol guaer
80 4800 053 0.31 1497 1440 57
85 6100 0.52 0.30 1569 1530 29
80 5400 0.50 029 1585 1620 -35
ss srao 049 028 las 1710 n
100 sooo 048 ose lsea leoo 112
oRuwAaE PorD cnLcuuAnoNs
RequirW grassyswale pond stxagevduma
a Impwvlow Area x.S in112 InJlt = 1128 cu. R
prnvidad 1309 eu R OKI
DRY4YELLREQUIREMEWTS 10 YEAR pESIGN STORM
N~Odmum staage n9ulred by BawsbinA • Fxs ww R.
proVided 1589 au R OK1
Number and type of Orywells Requhed • i S}ngle 0 Double
4
BOYYSTRINO METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESI0N) pRp,IECT 96124 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minutes)
DETENR10N BASlN DESbN gpSM 3
REMEWER MCM To (overlafnd) TC (gtrfto Areas C A C
NUMBER OF ORYUIIELLS PROP09ED DATE. 22-May,96
9 Sbrgle (lyypa A 0 Double (lype B) q o 015 L2 ~ 98 003 010 0002695
ToW Area (cafe )(see H1) 0.35 t1 = 50 0,32 0.80 0287397
lTnre ot Cenc. (cak )(see H1) S 00 L1(A) a 0 12 = 6 0 00 000 0
C=P"te'V(,caka (see Hi) 0.84 N(p) = 04 B a 0 0 00 000 0
~d conc. (mhn) 5 00 S(l) = 1 n$ O Ot6 0 00 0 00 0
Ama (Acm) 4m s= 0 02 0 00 0 00 0
C Facbr 084 Tc (A) n 0 00 d a 01255 0 00 0 00 0
StreetAtea (sq ft) 13910 ~
bwmian Area (sR 1) 13910 Total A Comp C
Volume Provldsd 208 593 stonn 888 L1(B) = 0 TC (gu) ~ 0 79 0 35 9.$4
Ouffl0w (efs) 0.3 N(B) a 04 Te(A+B) a 0 00
Area C Faetor 029 S(B) a 0 QaC I A= 0 92
zzCCaaaaana ~aaaa ~a TC(tOt S o0 Q(eS1.) = 0 91
#1 02 03 04 05 07 Tc (B) ~ 00 intenskyr= 31$
Thm Tmre irtensiy G Qev V In V out Staage A 3 0441007
hnt 111C Re" WP a 70396
(nd^ ) ((nJhr) (c16~/) R) ,y yRy) ~ ftp)~ R a 00626
iA \i~. (VYl A') ~.+~rv! Va 2.07
Te MftQ = To (overland) + Tc (guutt~or) TC(gu) = 019
5 00 300 00 318 0 92 371 80.00 281 TC (ove~and) a Ct'(L1 N!S"0 5)"0 6) Q{eso = 0 91
Ct=01S
S 300 318 0 92 371 9D 281 L1= Length of Ove►lend Flow HOIdltlg a 3 49
10 60Q 224 065 458 180 216 N Qfdcgon facto►of overlAnd Qaw (4 for average gress cover)
15 900 177 0.51 514 270 244 S= avomge slopa af ovarland Naw
20 1200 145 0 42 548 360 188 Tc (gutar) Q Longth (R,)1Velocity (RJseo )160
25 1500 121 0.35 582 450 112 B= 8oft41 wldth of guller or ddch
30 1800 104 0 30 574 540 34 Z1 c Imrerse of ccocs slope ono ot ditch
35 2100 021 0 26 591 830 49 Z2 - lnveise of cross slope two oi dkch
40 2400 0.82 024 595 710 125 d= depth of flaw In gutter (estlmate check estimate with Fiaw)
45 2700 074 0 21 601 610 209 Area - d B+d"212 (Z1+Z2)
50 3000 0 68 020 812 900 288 Wetted pedmeWr = B d+(11sin(afi(11L1))+11sin(atn(11E2)))
SS 3300 0 64 019 632 990 -358 Nydrtiutic Radltls a R m ACeeANelted P611111eter
W 3600 0 61 018 655 1080 -425 Velodly a 14881n R" 667's" 5
65 3900 0 60 017 697 1170 473 Flaw Q VelodqP'Area
70 4100 0 58 011 124 1m -538 I1 a 0 016 tor aeplla9t
75 4500 0 58 018 746 1350 -602 sa longididinal stope of guaer
80 4800 053 015 754 1440 -686
85 5100 052 015 18S 1s" 745
90 5400 0.50 01S 798 1620 -822
BS 5100 049 014 825 1710 .885
100 60M 0 48 014 850 1800 -950
~Cr1CC923z3z2CtC%=
ORAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS
Requbed gmssyawale pon0 sbuagevotume
~ ImpeMous Ama x .S In! 12 inJR a 880 a R
provlded 590 cu R OKI
DRYWELLREQUIREMENTS 10 YEAR OESION STORM
Mmdmum storage required by 8avrsbing ~ ~2811 cu R
provOdad 898 w R OKl
Number o11d lype olDyuolls ReQul►ed = 1 Shigle 0 Qoubl9
5
BOWSTRlNG METFiOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESION) pRp,JECT 88124 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minutes)
UETENTION BASIN OESIGN @A81N 4
REVIEWER MCM Te (ovetla" Tc (gutter) Areas C A C
NUMBER OF DRINVELLS Pi40POSE0 pATE 22-May-96
1 Single (type A 0 Oouble (lyype B) CtA 01S l2 a 51 0 00 015 0
Tolat Area (calo (soe H1) 025 Z1 s 50 O.ZS 0.90 0227831
Tinoaf Conc (eals )(s0e H1) 5 00 Lt (A) 0 0 Z2 a 6 0 00 0 00 O
OomposlEe'C (celc) (see H1) 090 N(A) a 04 B= 0 0 00 000 0
Ttme of Cone. (min) S 06 S(A) a 1 n= 0 016 000 000 0
Are° (Aam) 025 s= 0 02 0 00 000 0
C Facto► 0.90 Tc (A) = 0 00 d D 01145 000 000 0
Sbod Area (s4 Q) 11 027
finPevim Amn (s4 n) 11027 Total A Comp C
VoNme Provided 208 845 stortn 1161 L1(13) a 0 Tc (gu) 8 0 45 025 0 90
oum0N► (efs) 03 N(6) a 04 TC(A+B) = 0 00
Area C Feetor 029 S(9) a 0 a=C I Am 0 72
aaaw-am aaa~aa a~.:a---- - _ Qe~ar:x T6(tOl ) z 5 00 Q(esl.) ~ 0 71
01 g2 03 04 05 g8 #7 Tc (B) = 00 Intensfly a 316
Time Ttme IMenafy a dev V In V out Stotage q
Inc Inc Req'd) UVP= 64228
(mM ) (SM) OnAr1 (Cfs) fC+ N (CU (C+ ft.) R o 00572
(0116M ~ C6431 PS416I V = 195
xzcr=="~ ~ 'r- Tc (total) a Tc (overl0nd) + Tc (gulter) Tc(O) = 0 45
5 00 300A0 318 072 291 9000 201 Tc (overland) = Ct'(L) NfS"0 5)"0 6) Q(est) = 0 71
Ct- 015
S 300 318 0 72 291 90 201 L1= Length of Ovedansl Flow Holding R 185
10 600 224 0 St 358 180 176 N a tftlion factor of overiand liow (4 far avemge gress eover)
1 S 900 177 0 40 404 270 134 S= average siop0 of ovcrland RoMr
10 1200 145 0.33 430 360 70 Tc (guutU~er) a Length (R.)Nuloo(ty (ftJsec )!60
ZS 1500 121 028 442 450 .8 B= Bottom width of guker or dkh
30 1800 104 024 451 540 .89 Zt =(nverse of crosa slope one of dibah
35 2100 0 91 0.21 4S7 830 173 I2 = Invorse of cross sfopo two of ditch
40 2400 0 82 019 467 720 253 d= depth of flow in gutter (estlmats cheQk oWmste vnth Flaw)
45 2700 074 017 472 810 -338 Area a d B+d"112 (Z1+Z2)
50 3000 0 88 01S 481 900 -419 Wetted pednreter o B"cl++(1lsin(aM(121))+lisin(atn(122)?1
55 3300 0.84 015 498 990 -484 HydraUlic Radlus a R= ArealWettad Pedmetet
60 3600 061 014 814 1080 -666 VeloCity=1486111 R" 697'b",6
65 3900 0 80 014 847 1170 -823 Flow a ValocHy'Ama
10 4100 0 58 013 888 1260 -682 n a 0 016 br esphaft
TS 4500 0.58 013 587 1350 163 e a tongftudfnel slape of guftt
80 4800 053 012 592 1440 448
8S 5100 0.52 012 61B 1530 -914
80 5400 0.50 Q 11 627 1620 -093
95 5700 049 Q 11 648 1710 1082
100 6000 048 011 661 1800 1133
ORAMAGE POND CALCUINTIONS
Requlred grassy swalo patid stonogo volwne
~ Impervtous Area x.5 Inl 12 InJR a 459 eu R
pmrlded 645 au R OKI
DRYWEII. REQUIREMENTS 10 YEAR OESIGN STORM
IUw6rmun atorega requlred by 8orvsbing o 20 dr fL
provlded 1161 eu R. OK)
Mumber end type ctDywolls Required s 1 Single 0 Qouble
e
- _ - _ .r..«..._».._
~ ( ' ♦
~
DRAINAGE 6ASIN MAP
SCAIE 1" ~ 100
~1 ~ ♦
7,777
~
, -
TiME QF CONCENTRATION
FLOW PATH TYPICAL
J I
Q I
L_J
SASH 2 / .
_ LJ
r~
( r . i a . ~
~ ZO
~ -
~
~ ~
.a w t O 0? O-0' M h t
^ t~r °~l..w.nn:Ma'Ct ~ A r Jr.
edt ,4 ~G ~4+to na*aae. ~e a1 a~
T
t Y~ rt r Q oa d~N1
z
~ r isi ~ i o~'~ 1 !9 ff ~ YI ~
o 0 o-a t .n 4
93o6 N Newport Highway j~
Spottane, WA. 99218 Phone 509488-7828 , d
Feut 60DA68-7534
/F t Z ~
~
r A
= 1
e
~ ! e
♦ ~ S
v .r o n r,
ITO: DOUG BUSKO
Company SPOKANE C4UNTY ENGiNEERS
Phone 509-456-3600
Fax- 509-324-3478
From. JAY BONNETT
Company: J R. BONNETT ENGINEERING ~
~
Phone 509-468-7626
.
Fac; 509-468-7534
Date 10/21/96 ~
Pages including thts cover page. 1+1=2
Commerits
Re INLAND COMMERCE PARK
Ooug
Approech sketch along Nlanner for prMaft drNeway per out discussion this momtng Piease taNlew and
epprave br eonstructlon If you hevs arV questions, please catl
Thanks
Jay sonnett, P E ~
10 d 10291 891P 60SS 5N I PI33N I'N3-113NN0ff' Z11' W!i 1P0 : T T NOW 96- T Z-130
a
. APp~pACK
~CRE~
C0 ~,~pNE
pt,R ~ y-
5Ip ~►w
t
BER~ PER wAY
pR ~Z~~~
~
Eg-~~t
D~ 0 ~11a ►
~ t ~ ~ ~ . •I .
, ~ ♦ ►
r y / ~ •
~ r ,
~ .
« , 4 M.
~ , ~ ~ r/
♦
Ul~
♦ a
x
, w /
■ + n
.,,r• , Wt
~ ti ~ • ♦ + ~
`
,
Z~ '
. .
Si p~usN
r-- ro~A~~ ors ~
" .
~ ~
~ '0
r- *W'DC
~ C~1R$ g INUEt CwN~ "
'Po~'p,~~ (OE
pER G ~..8
► 6*-
~
~
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DIVISION OF ENGIYVEEitIING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEI'AftTMFNT
Willlam A johns P.E. Cauntq Engineer Detuus M Scott P E Director
June 20, 1996
Jay Bonnett, P E
J R. Bonnett Engineenrig
9306 N Newport Highway
Spokane, Washuigton 99218
Re Office Park Development at North 1628 Mamer, Road Comments 1
Jay,
The County Engneers have reviewed the road plan for ttus site and offer the following
comments
eShow the existing centerluie elevations on the plan sheet
k'oFrovide vertical curve length on the plan.
eCall out the stabon where curbing wnll begin.
4"'Provyde curb uilet calculations for the roadway Call out the reqwtred.widths on the
plans
5 Provide a legal descnphon for the drainage easement.
eA radcused approach will not be allowed A County Standard Urbaa Approach, as
shown on sheet A-7, must be used
KNlaximum slope on the fill for the road is 2 1 A slope of 3 1 is adequate, but may
require more fill than necessary
8 Provide a legal descnption for the requued slope easement
9f"'Inctude a detail of the slope easement area, showuig aU dunensions aad elevations
M***'Show a typical cross-section of the road in the area of the fill slope The muumum
width of the flat azea behuid the curb is 1'
1026 W Hroadway Ave. Sgakane, WA 992b0-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX. (549) 324-3478 T'DD (509) 3243166
M Place the Engineer's Design Certificaiion staiement (page 32) on the plans
12 After finalization of the plans, please mgn the Mylaz and have the Owner sign rt, also
13 Submrt the signed agreement between the Owner and the Enguieer, outlming the
construction engneenng services to be provided, along wlth an estimate for compleuon
of these servlces A performance bond esrimate wdl be given to the Owner when ttus is
accomplished
1o(OO'Subnut a copy of the recorded property deed to begin the 5' R/W dedication process
14 Where Ls this fire hydrant located and what datum is the elevahon based on'?
Please call if you have any questions regarding this review
Sincerely,
Willism A Johns, P E
eer
er
ZLEng ui
Dougl Busko, E I T
Plans Review Enguiieer
~
~S P O KA, N E C O U N T Y
DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND RAADS ~ A DMSiOV OF TNE PUHLIC WORKS DFPARTmENT
William A johns P E. County Enguteer Denms M Scatt P E Director
June 6, 1996
Mr Robert Townsend
Inland Construction Company
102 East Sprague Avenue
Spokane, Wastungton 99202
Re. Office Pnrk Developmeat at Nort616Z8 Mamer, Review 1
Dear Bob,
The County Enguieers have reviewed the on-site drainage plan for this site and offer the
followuig comments
Archgec
1 Coordmate the landscape plan wrth the drainage plan, so that landscaping Ls not placed
in the ciramage swales Also, note that a proposed tree in the north parkmg lot blocks the
drainage channel from one swale to another
Eumneer
2The roof arm m Basin 1 must be iaciuded m the Bowstnng calculations Please re-
ealculate the reqwred drywells for Basm I and subaut the revised calculations
3 Maximum side-slopes on swales is 2 1, for swaIes up to 12" deep
Please communicate these comments to your Architect and Enguieer Alsoa if you could
bring in a copy of the recorded property deed for the 5' dedication on Mamer we could
get started on that
Sincerely,
William A 7ohns, P E
Coun Engmeer
r
W
Douglas w Busko, E I T
Plans Review Engiaeer
1025 W Broadway Ave. Spokane WA g9Z64-0170 (509) 4563M FAX. (509) 324-3478 TDD (509) 3243165
/
~
~ J.R. BomvETTENGiNEEmwG
CIM &S7RUC7URALBNGINESR1NiC'iA(:ONS{JLTIJVG
93U6 N NEMR7'XVHWAY
SROKANE )WA- 99218
e5o9) 46s-7626-
~
,
DRA/NAGE ANALYSIS
of
~
IVIAIl11ER ROAD 1MPROVEdUlE1VTS R
Intand Commerce Parfc
Spo{awee WA
OFFICrAI. PUBUC DOCUr1EN'r
$KKANE COLINTY ENGINEER S 4FF3CE
Ibr 001 PRO,lECT #
SUNiTTAL # 641 ~
F$ETURM T COUNTY ENGsNEEA
y ~ wONN i
~ o~ '~y <`3'~►
~ INLAND COIVSTi4UCT10N ~
SpOKANE WASH/NGTON
,pF30693
GlSTE4
June 1996 HA L
JRBE Job No 86124
O~tEe ~O-3 - ~i(O
JOB
J R BONNETT ENGINEERING sHMr No ~ oF 3
9306 North Newport Highway
SPOKANE WA 99218 ca.cuuiren er onTE
TEL. (509) 468 7626 ~
FAX (509) 468 7534 c►+EcKeu sv DnTE
scaLE
A-M E-1L iQAe 7" ~rM^'-vV e IN C7V T ~
~
D~9-I nlAGr1~ !'~NAt yC it
~~-✓iou S r~2h4 - ~o x 5 o s' = SOSa
'2OY, A (/o~JrcE ~~D - ( ~2~ saSz~ s~~ ' 210 1-tg
'20 8' l/D t-U VA6 ! P'01/ qpu,-) = 5 ~'~C c"?6 2(p t '4 Z j ~ 'S ) 23~ p Ox
, ~ --T
,
~
~ 1J0n .~TW&l- 3M PP4%&MtiJTS 6d.s ~ s r oX </o 'A4~0-J PA-v„)G
t ,
~
C~.✓vE-t- 4..✓ dAe To "~og Pe.~.a m
~ /~IO !~`,~j► ~DE o~ ~ f-t, ~~F ~rTi1r-HE?~ ~FTt /~-J
2
~
!
!
~
S
i
:
P
J
rsr rci r^ na. ~ w~ a+•rr r~a zFi a~o
; ~opa p~ V ~1p~ ry~q + +yup~y Np ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ 2
~ OWOYI~NO~II~YiOIAONONONOH O ~ ~ ~ ~~~Ar'11
~ ~ ; . .
~ 10
$ APPP P......►~~..N~a ~ ~ ~ o ~
, S~
~e ,popppoooopo~oyooooL;cdj~jp
~ jL~N0J07 V Vpm~~l~~~rllr.~~
~J 3
~ ~ -
N o a
~
~ Y .Ni • i .Ji V r ~ J~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O~ r Ylo •~o~~~~~o~~~0~~0~6~~8~ S~~ I~ m~
wA~~~~~"P.~iN
< 4p1~Q1~ ~JZ.r.Q~ p n .15~ IAL~ -1
nae ~ 0 0~
40 O Op g !7 O ~
j' tl0A0 N
\ a
aIL~~ ~ n 1 0 0 I 0 p~ ~
~ ~ q po u
NPa~OmFi~
~ ~ ~-1<70~> p
~ a „3 p~ ooeeeoo
~ . o N IV
+ o~ o000000
eooooo1
~
a
+n ~ORIZ SCALE
~ YERT SCALE " ' mja t4
a
mu
> > >
ca~
4JW W WNW
1+00 2+00 3+00 a+oo s+oo e+aa
SPOC" CWMn SM ORVVQL SEC 1 O, T25N9 R 44 EWM
TYK A N e 4 Mn #id4 n~Ew - 5~03o Sf a au~e. c~R rn aEr.1se4 e ~ ~
SLoPE FASEe¢rot oR RErairiIrG
S1RUCIURE aS RECUrRED
MA% $OFE n 3!1 IV
CONCRETIE IFIOC D PAD E%ISilNC (
CpNTaURS
0 00 oF aRe vCR EAaTM MM vEa
on z/sm on 3/m TYa cRoss cunE+ rnE z
PER SPOxAwE COUNIY
sTo oWO 9-1e caHTINue
QRAINACE EASEyFN1 AROUND F.MNE TMRU INXasEcnOu
Xt flE1q PAVINC 10 POND (110 x 13) SEND tA, 8~28 23
1bC PAVplQ UATpI E%IS1tNG PANNG
19891 19900 A1 HATt~lEO AREA,
o 198 0 TQC, TO C.
a ro ! >
LF
, o _ _
~ 1 ~
/ CEFIIERUNE
/ prLEt qJRB INLET TYPE I
1 aER VacaNE can+n 1 ~ 1
sm owc e-a (ooPRss
CRass zoa oOMO Pat 27 Le •20Ban
" sPacuK can+tr stos~ saE on x/sra L eDcE or aR ~o~
I ~ 1pTAl f1A ~A•470 SF 1 ~a tp A~IIAIT PAIANC
~ ECGE af a 0 w SAwcuT EXISnrrG ECGE GF t~
1 t PAVF?AdVT iCR S!,1001H
~ maNS1naH
s' o a~Ta m 1 8~1f~ = J6, IDO sF L~
~ k w
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN ~
a
' J.R. BoNNETTENauvEEjuNG
C.I wtL & sTR uc ruPAL Fn+rI~',v~rMNr-L nArsuLTfNc
9306 Ar NttWORT titrHl cA I
Ml.1l1Vr- 0.4 992 18
f309! 469 76,?6
DRAINr4GE STi1D Y
of
fIVLAN[~ COM1111ERCE PARK
, spakone u+vA
o~~~~~AL pUBuc DocuMENr
far SPOKANE C4UAiTY ENGINEERS OFFtCE
0 - NA
pROACT # -0
SLIBMMtTTAL # . 4 ~
RETURNT4 CkJN~f QMEER
130
lNLAND CO111STRUCTlON
sPolcMF, wasNrnrGrOnr
30fi93
~fST~4
MAY 1996 AL
JRBE Job Na 96924 ~
mm 10-3
i
fNLANDCOWURCEPARK •
oaaMaoesnror
JneFJosNO MIAa
sa~se '
I
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PARAMETERS ~
-
BASIN TOTALMEA IMPERYARFA OVERtANDFLQW GURERfIdW TOTAIFLOW BASM
LOopU 0 PA Te(tataJ~ I(Unk) C(Llnk) CCI'A
fl 2 lkroi h 7 Aeree p lt(A~ N1(A4 SI(A) lt(B) Nt1~ Si(8) Te L Z1 II 6i, a A(Unk) YY1(tlk) R V Te W
ra 2,~ao a a o 4 o o 00 isif- s.w St > o l ue , a, x1 d-~ ue 1
z 3a 3fe zi oe~ a. 0 4- ► o 1 0o axt s,oo 062 o abi I i 2i7 i z bs 3.1es ~ t,~ -Zas j i 73 Fi.b -z -
~wo _o ae n o~o ~ go.o -soo 501" oai obii roa o,aa i oie a a~ t S 3+~ a e e r Q.~ 3
16 -oaa 1 oso od s
n - o 0 o r~ iM i o44 " o~' t ~d' t a h 2. ~
r►4o
NpTE See u4v*uai 8'owswlrq wlaRauaes !a more mtwmwm ~ I I i I I I I- I _ I_ - I-_ I I I I - ~ _ I I I I I I I I 1
2
1
lNLAND COA9MERCE PARK
ORAINAGE STUDY '
JRBE JOB NO 96124
6%22/96
IMPERVIOUS AREA
BASIN -Street Length Street Area Misc Area ~ Resid Imperv Tatal Area
~ (ftA Z) (ftA 2) (ftA Z) ft"Z -
1 -0 - - 29,300 0 - 0 29,300 -
2 0 - 27,085 0 ~ 0 ~ 27,085 ✓
3 0 13,910 0 0 ~ 13,910 00
4, 0 11,027 0 0 ~ 11,027 ~
TOTAL 0 81322 ~ 0 0 81322
1
BOVYSTRINO METH00 (TEN YEAR STORM OE910N) pRQJECT 86124 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (m(nutes)
DETENTION BASIN OESIGN SAGIN I c
REVIEWER MCAq Ta (overland) Te (gutE~er) Areas C A C
NUMBER OF ORYWELLS PROPOSED pATE, 22.Mey.gg
0 Single (lype A) 1 Qouble (ype B) Ct= 015 L2 a 1S8 112 010 0111958
Total Area (calc )(see Ht) 179 Z1 = 50 0 67 090 0 605372
Tlme af Conc (cale )(see H1) s a0 Lt (A) ° u z2 a s 000 000 0
Composite C(cale)(see H1) 0 40 N(A) n 04 8 n 0 0 00 0 00 0
Time af Cons (min) Sco 9(A) = 0 005 n a 0016 000 000 0
Area (Acm) 179 s z 0 02 000 000 0
C Fnsbot 0 40 TC (A} a 0 00 d a 01766 000 000 0
Street Area (sq R.) 29300
Imporvious Area (sq R,) 29300 Tatal A Camp C
VOlume Provided 208 1338 9totm 1448 L1(8) a 0 TC (gu) = 101 178 0 40
Qutllaw (ds) 1 N(8) ° 04 Ts(A+B) = 000
Area C' Fadar 072 S(B) a 0 Q=C I Aa 2 28
92z2z2CV=%zC3z1° °"'°Ct°`._-- - O' °a_.- --T° ~ Tc(tot.) = S 00 Q(est) ~ 127
$1 #2 #3 04 AS 08 07 Ta (B) a 00 Intensity = 918
Tiete Time Intensiy Q dev V(n V out Storage A= 0873252
Ine Inc Reqd) yyp a 99060
{min } (sec ) pnfit ) (cft) (cu R) (cu ft.) (cu ft ) R o 00882
(01 60) fA CVM fOutf 02) (05-M V a 260
CtC1r"2zWCt=CM° I Tt (tataO a TC (ov8rland) + Te (8utter) Tc(gu) = 101
S Oa 30000 318 2.28 911 30000 611 Tc (avedand) = Ct (L1 Id1S"0 5)"0.6) C(est) = 2.27
Cta01S
S 300 318 228 917 300 617 L1 a leregth ol0varland Flow HoldinA = S 63
10 600 221 181 1128 600 528 N a Inetlon taatcr of avorland flow (4 far averege gress aover)
15 900 177 121 1272 900 372 S n everage slape of oveAend Row
20 1200 145 104 1354 1200 1S4 Te (gu!!er) a L8flo (NN6IpCHy (ftJgec AQ
2S 1500 121 0 87 1380 i5Q0 110 8c Bokom wid3h of gutter or dtbdh
30 1800 1.04 075 1419 1800 -381 t1= imremo of eroas slope ono et dfDeh
35 2100 021 065 1437 2100 4m Z2 a Inverse af cross slope twa of dltch
40 2400 0.82 0 59 1472 2400 928 d= depth of 8aw in guttet (esdmate eheclc asklmate wdh Flov)
45 2700 014 053 1487 2700 1213 Area=d B+d"?J2 (Z1+Z2)
SO 3000 0 88 0 49 1513 30M 1487 Waited porimeter = B d+(11s1n(aEn(121))+11sln(atn(122)))
85 3300 0 84 0 48 1562 3300 1738 Ffydreulic ROdlus = R= AreaIWotted Perlrtretor
60 3600 0 81 0 44 1820 3809 1980 Yeta(ty =14881i R" 6'67's".S
65 3900 0 60 0 43 1722 3900 2178 Flow a Velaihr'Area
TO 4200 0 58 0 42 1m 4200 2410 n Q 0 018 for esphan
75 4500 056 040 1849 4500 2651 s D longftdinal stope of guner
80 4800 0 53 0,38 1864 4800 2936
85 5100 Ob2 037 1940 5100 .3160
90 5400 0 50 0.36 1973 5400 .3427
95 5700 049 0.35 2039 $700 4m
100 6000 0 48 0 34 2101 so00 -384g
ORAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS
Requlred gmssyswole pond sEoragevolume
a ImperAous Area x S fn/ 12 InJR a 1221 cu ft
provided 1336 au R OKl
ORYVYELL REQUIREMENTS 10 YEJ1R DESKiN STORM
Maidmum aore9a required bY Sawstrt+A ° 617 w R
provided 1448 eu R. OK!
Number and type of Dtywelis Requhmd ~ 0 Single 1 Qouble
9
BOWSTRINO METH00 (TEN YEAR STCRM CESI6N) pRp,IECT 98124 TiME OF CONCENTRATION (mfiubes)
DE1 ENT10N BASIN DESIGN 1:1ASlN 2 •
RENIEVIIER MCM Tc (overland) Tc (gutber) Areas C A C
NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED OqTE 22.Mey-98
1 Shigie (lyype A 0 Double (lype 8) Ct D 015 L2 = 423 017 010 0A18828
Tota1 Area (eafe)(see H1) 079 Z1 = SO 0 82 090 0 5596'O7
Tlrrte of Conc (caie )(see Hl) Soo L1(!) a 0 Z2 = 8 0 00 0 00 0
Composfto C(alc )(sea H1) 013 N(A) = 04 8=
0 000 OQD 0
T(me of Cono (min) 5 00 S(A) = 0 Q05 n= 0 016 0 00 000 0
Area Oam) 079 s a oaz ooa ooa o
C fadct 013 Tc (A) = 0 00 d~ 01628 0 40 0 00 0
Street Area (sq R.) 27 085
Impervlaus Area (sq R) 27 Q85 Tolel A ComQ C
Votumo Provides 208 1309 storm 1569 Lt (B) $ 0 Tc (gu) a 2 87 0 79 073
outllow (ds) 03 N(B) = 04 TC(A+B) a 0 00
Area C Factot 0 58 S(8) a 0
--s. . Tc{tot.) = S 40 G=C I A= 183
A1 02 p3 iW p5 06 07 Tt (8) = 00 Inlensiiy a ~-48
Time Time Irtansky C dev V In V out Storage p~, _
Inc Inc Req~~ ( ) 162
(mln) (sec ) ltnJhr ) (ds) (cu R) (cu R.) (cu R) A a 0.740285
(41 60) (A C'03) (CuM'#2) (05-" WP = 9i'1o'1
- Tc (tataQ = Tc (overland) * Tc (9uftar) R a 0,0812
5 00 30000 318 183 737 9000 641 Tc (ovedand) n Ct'(L1 WIS"0 5)110 6) V n 2 46
Ct o 015 Tc(gu) ~ 2 87
5 300 918 183 737 90 647 l1 a L611 UI of Weflend FIOW
B Q(w) a 182
10 800 224 1,29 906 180 728 N= hicdan focbar ai overland flow ( A!or average gress eover)
15 900 177 102 1022 270 752 S= average slopa otavedend ftow Holding = 15 07
20 1200 145 0 84 1Q88 360 728 Tc (guteo = Lenglh (R)Nclocity (ftlsec )I80
25 15Q0 1.21 070 1117 450 667 B= Batom vndth of gutter or ditch
30 1800 104 0 60 1140 540 BOS Ll =(nVels9 of aoss si0pe One of ditoh
35 2100 0.91 052 11SS 830 S2S Z2 = hrverse of Goss alope NMO of ddch
40 2400 0 82 0 47 1182 720 462 d a dgpth cl ilow In gutber (esbrtraw check estlmate vwth FtorJ)
45 2700 074 043 1195 810 385 Area s d'B+d"212 (Z1+Z3)
54 3000 0 88 0.98 1215 900 315 Wetted perlmster a B d+(11sin(atn(121))+11sln(abi(122)))
55 3300 064 037 1255 990 26S Hydmulic Recrius a R a AreaMletmd Perimeter
60 3800 0 81 0 35 1301 1080 221 Yelocfly =1488ln R" 667 s" 5
65 3900 0 60 0 3S 1384 1170 214 Flow = Vekdly'Area
70 4200 0 98 0.33 1438 1260 178 n a 0 018 Por nphal!
75 4500 0'SB 0.32 1485 1350 13S s= lOt1g}ludh181 slOpe of gu1ter
80 4800 0.69 031 1497 1440 57
85 51co 012 0.30 1859 1530 24
90 g400 0 SO 0.29 1s85 1828 3S
95 ST00 0 49 0.28 1638 1710 72
100 6000 048 028 lae 1800 »z
oRAINu►ce PoHO caLcuLanoNs
Required grassy swale pond atorage voluma
~ Imperviais Area x.S in! 12 InlR = 1129 eu R
Provided 1309 ai R OK!
DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS 10 YEAR DESiOtd STORM
Maxfmum sMrage required by Bow~ring cu R
providod 1589 au R. OKI
Number an0 type of Orywells Required = 1 Single 0 Ooubfe
4
BOYVSTRINO METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESION) pROJECT 96124 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minutes)
OETENTION @ASIN DESIGN BASIN 3
REUIEWER MCM Tc (overland) Te (guQer) Areaa C A C
NUMBER OF ORYYIIELLS PROPOSED DATE 22 MoyAB
1 Singf a(lypa A 0 Double (tyypo B) Ct = 015 l2 3 98 0 03 010 0002695
Tolal /4rea (ealc ) (see H1) 0 35 Z1 a SO 0 32 0 80 0287397
fine of Cone. (ealc )(seeH1) 5 Ofl l1(A) a 0 71= 6 000 0 00 0
ComRosfte C(cak )(see H1) 0.84 N(l) = 04 8= 0 000 000 0
T(me ef Conc (min) S 00 S(A) - 1 n= 0 016 0 00 000 0
Af@8 (AW83) 0.35 S a 002 000 000 0
C Fector 0 84 T6 (A) = 000 d a 01255 0 00 0 00 0
SEree! Araa (sq R) 13910 ~
Impewious Area (sq R.) 13910 Total A Comp C"
VOIUme Provided 208 593 stOnn 898 L1(B) ~ 0 Ta (gu) = 0 79 0 35 0 84
Outtlow (cfs) 03 N(9) ~ 04 Tc(A+B) = 0 00
Area C Factor 0 29 S(8) a 0 0=C i A= 0 92
amstctctzzzrztma° ~ zzCzCzr'°°°°' °'Q°IIztQ" ztCt°z9Cr92zr_° Tc(tot) = 5 00 Q(est) = 0 91
#1 92 09 $4 #S A6 i7 To (B) = 00 Intensiiy z 318
Time Time Intensily G dev V in V oul Storage A= 0441007
ine. Irtc Req d) WP = 70396
(min ) (seC ) (infir ) (Cfs) (cu (t ) (au R) (cu R) R = 00626
(#1 6m (A C'93) {CuU'im (OS46) V= 207
aaaneaaa~s -.-j cae.- - aae,__...,-z TC (EOfen = Tc (overland) + Tc (gut0aer) TC(gU) a 0 79
5 00 30000 318 0 82 371 9000 281 Tc (averlar+d) = CY'(Lt W!S110 5)"0 6) Q(est) = 0 91
Ct=01S
S 300 318 0 92 371 90 281 Lt = LenBth oi Overland Flow Holding II 349
10 600 2 24 0 85 456 180 276 N= fncdon faetor oi overhmd Qow ( 4 for average gress eover)
15 900 177 0 51 514 270 244 S Q avoraga stope af overland lfow
20 1200 145 0 42 548 360 188 Tc (gulD4a Lengtl1Qt.)Nelotity (itlses )160
25 1500 1.21 0 35 862 450 112 B a 8otrom widtlh ai gufter or ditch
30 18Q0 104 030 574 540 34 Zt = inverse oi cvoss siope one oi dltsh
35 2100 0.91 0a6 561 630 49 Z2 a lmrerse Of cress slope Mro of ditch
40 2400 0 82 024 595 720 125 d a dapthof Aow In gutber (asNmato cheek estimate wfth Flov)
45 27Qa 0 74 0.21 601 810 289 Afea a d B+d"7J2 (Z1+Z2)
SO 3000 0 6e 0.20 612 900 288 WetlBd pe7iRl0tar a 8 d+(llshl(aM(121))+llsln(aM(1fZ2)))
55 3300 0 64 019 632 990 .358 Hydraullo Radiis a R a ArealWetted Perimeter
60 3600 0 61 018 655 1080 -425 Veiocity =14Mn R" 687 s" 5
6S 3900 060 017 691 1170 473 Flow = Velacily'Area
TO 42W 0.58 017 724 1280 536 n fl 0 016 for aepfmli
15 4500 0 56 016 748 1350 .602 s a longipidlnal slope of guttar
80 4800 0.53 0 15 754 1440 .688
85 5100 052 0 iS 185 1530 745
90 5400 050 015 198 1820 -822
95 5700 0 49 014 825 1710 4185
100 BQ00 0 48 014 850 1800 -950
a=C9Ct====== a~a CrCn2C"=%2=r=
oRuwAce Porio cucULAnoNs
Requlred grassy swals Rand atorage volume
a Impervious Area x S(n/ 12 (n1R = 580 cu R.
provtded 593 cu. R. OKI
DRYWELL REGUIREMENTS 10 YEAR OESION STORM
MaAmum storage requlrod by Bawatring a 284 cu R
ptovided 898 cu R OKI
Number and typa of Orywelis Required n 1 Singie 0 Doublo
s
BOWSTRINO METFl00 (TEN YEAR S10RM DESION) pRpJECT 96124 T1ME OF CONCEMRATION (mmutes)
l)ETENTION BA31N DESIGN BA,S(N 4 e
REVIEWER MCM Te (ovetiand) Te (gutEof) A►eas C A C
NUMBER OF ORYWELLS PROPOSED DATE 22-May 98
1 Single (lype A 0 Qauble (lyype B) Ct ~ 01S l2 = 52 0 00 015 0
Tolal Area (cak )(see M1) 02S Z1 = 50 025 0 90 0227831
Tfma of Conc (calc )(see H1) S 00 L1(A) = 0 22 a 6 000 000 0
Composite C(calc )(see Ht) 0 90 N(A) = 04 8n 0 0 00 040 0
Time ot Cona (rtdn) 5 00 S(A) D 1 n= 0 018 0 00 0 00 0
Area (1kres) 0.25 s a 0 02 000 0 00 0
C FatCor 0 90 Te (A) = 000 d a 01145 0.00 0 00 0
StrW Ares (eq A,) 11027
ImpoMous Area (sq R.) 11027 Tatel A Comp C
Volume Provided 208 845 stonn 1181 Ll (B) = 0 TC (gu) a 0 45 0 25 0 90
OulRow (cfs) 03 N(B) = 04 Tc(A*B) = 0 00
Area C Factor 023 S(6) = 0 O=C I A= 072
Tc(tot ) = S 00 O(est ) ~ 0 71
A1 02 03 A4 #5 06 07 Tc (B) = 00 Irtensky = 918
Time TimO IntenSiry Q dev V In V oul Starag0 A a 0367087
Inc Inc Req d) WP = 64226
lmin1 (SM) QnJhr1 (Cfs) (cu A.) (CU ft ) (C+ N R = 00572
(01 60) (A C'#3) (Oulf '92) (fRS~ V a 1.95
s------ _ r- -a aaaaaozea aaaaaaaaa TC (t010Q a Te (avedand) + Te (gutter) TC(aU) = 0 45
S 00 30000 316 072 291 9000 201 Te (OVe1lBncq = Ct (Lt WIS"0 5)"0 8) Q(est) a 071
Ct=015
S 300 318 0 72 291 90 201 Lt o Lengfh of Overtand Flow Holding = 185
10 B00 2.24 0 51 358 160 176 N n frictlon faetor of overfand Aow (4 for avurage grnss caver)
15 900 177 0 40 404 270 134 S a averag+3 sdope of avedand flow
20 1200 145 0.33 430 360 70 Te (gultw) a Lengfh (R )lVelocHy (iUsee )160
25 tsc0 121 0.28 442 450 -8 B= Bottom width ot gutter or dhsh
30 1800 104 024 451 540 -89 Zl = imerse of aoas slopo one Ot dfth
35 2100 0 91 0.21 457 830 173 Z2 = inve189 Of CfOSS SIOpe two 01 ditah
40 2440 082 018 487 720 253 dc depth ot Naw In gutter (estlmoto eheck esltmate wlh Flsw)
45 2700 0 74 017 47I 810 ~338 Area n d'B*dA7f1'(7.1+Z2)
50 3000 0 68 O 1S 481 900 418 W8tted p8lIfl10wf a B d+(11sln(ab(121))+11sin(etn(122)))
55 3300 0 84 015 496 990 494 Hydmulle Radius a Ra ArealWeCed Perimeter
60 3600 0 61 014 514 1080 -568 V@lOdly a 14881h*i" 687 g" 5
85 3900 0 80 014 547 1170 -823 flow = Vefociry'Area
70 4200 0 58 013 588 1260 482 n= 0 016 ht asphalt
75 4509 0.58 013 SBT 1350 763 s a longiludhtaf slope ot guttet
80 4800 0 53 012 692 1440 -848
8S 5100 0 52 012 818 1530 -914
90 5400 0.50 011 827 1620 J99
95 5700 0 49 011 648 1 710 1062
100 8000 0 48 011 N7 16w 1133
~aneo ~ e~aao ~ o~am ~a ~
ORAlNA(3E POND CALCUlATiONS
Requ(red grassy swale paad storage volume
a Impervious Area x 5(nl 12 inJR - 458 eu R
provlded 845 cu R OKI
OItYWELL REQUIREMENTS 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM
Mwdmum storage required by Bcwstring n 801 au R
prov(ded 1181 cu R, OKl
Number and type at Orywe11{s Raquired ~ 1 Stngie 0 Double
a
♦
_ -p4m
l ~ .
~
1 IN ~~`P
~ pR AI~ ~ s~a►.~ ~ ~ `
. ~
i'
/
oF
'i1ME 4~ pA~ T(~'ICAL
FL
.
~ r 1 r~
~
, . $
. 1
,
~
r ~
~
I.R. BomvETTENGEvEE"NG
~
ClM& MUC7URA1 1'NGlNBBRlNG/CONSULl1R'C,
9306 A NCIVPDIZT!llGHfi'AY
SPOAANb ►9A 99318
(509) 468-7626
STREET CROSS GRADF CALCULAT101VS
of
N1AMER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Inland commerce Fartc
Spo{mne WA.
fbr
OFFICfAL PUBLIC DOCUMENT
SRpKANE COUNTY ENGINE-ER S OFfI~
~ ~ °
PAOJECT # s ~ .~►n~IL w~asN~F~ °
L.~ ~r P uF ~►i ~
RETURN TO COUNTY ENGiNEFI
lA1LAND CONSTRUCTION
SPOKANE WASHINGTON
'°~O 30693
~'E► Q1STE~
SS~aNAL
June 1986 JRBE Job No 96124 ewiREB 10-3
~~G
.r '
I MAMER ROAD • Street Cross Grade Calculations
DlSTANCE ASPHALT ASPHALT
CENTERLINEICENTERLINEI EOER TO EDGE OF I CROS3 I FL4WLINE I DISTANCE TO CROSS J
STATION ~ ELEVATION I ELEVATION PAVING I SLOPE JELEVATIONI FLOWLINE I SLOPE I TOC ELEV
ft R ft (0/0) 1 ft ft % ft
0+6135 1982 62 198302 1308 406 198302 0 00 N/A NIA
0+90 ~ 198358 ~ 1884 09 ~ 1273 ~-4 01 ~ 198419 ~ 2 50 ~ N/A ~ N/A
1+2168 ~ 198492 ~ 198481 ~ 1060 ~ 104 ~ 198467 ~ 700 ~ 2 00 ~ N/A
1+35 79 ~ 198563 ~ 198565 ~ 1110 ~ 072 ~ 198528 ~ 8 90 ~ 3 03 ~ 198578
1+52 72 ~ 198651 ~ 198644 ~ 1170 ~ 060 ~ 198619 ~ 8 30 ~ 3 01 ~ 198669
1+68 02 ~ 198723 ~ 198703 ~ 1180 ~ 169 ~ 198678 ~ 820 ~ 3 05 ~ 198728
2+0019 ~ 198866 ~ 198827 ~ 1210 ~ 2 31 ~ 198803 ~ 7 90 ~ 3 04 ~ 1988 53
2+19 31 ~ 198920 ~ 198902 ~ 11 10 ~ 162 ~ 198875 ~ 8 90 ~ 3 03 ~ 198925
2+31 12 f 198980 ~ 198940 ~ 1110 ~ 3 60 ~ 198913 ~ 8 90 ~ 3 03 ~ 198963
3+01 12 ~ 159187 ~ 199137 ~ 1110 4 50 ~ 199110 ~ 8 90 N 3 03 ~ 199160
3+28 31 199301 ~ 199258 ~ 1230 3 50 ~ 199235 ~ 770 j 299 ~ 199285
3+89 85 199690 ~ 199617 ~ 1230 ( 5 93 ~ 199594 ~ 7 70 ~ 2 99 ~ 199644
4+2109 ~ 199980 ~ 199914 1230 ~ 5 37 ~ 199891 ~ 7 70 ~ 2 99 ~ 199941
4+59 47 ( 200404 ~ 200365 12 70 ~ 307 ~ 200343 ~ 7 30 ~ 3 01 ~ 200393
4+95 09 ~ 2008 63~ 200840 ~ 12 30 ~ 187 ~ 200817 ~ 7 70 ~ 2 89 ~ 200867
5+48 21 ~ 201643 ~ 201609 ~ 1280 ~ 2 66 ~ 201587 ~ 7 20 ~ 3 06 ~ 201637
5+97 69 ~ 202392 ~ 202342 ~ 1320 ~ 3 79 ~ 202322 ~ 6 80 ~ 2 94 ~ 202372
6+26 23 ~ 202805 ~ 202755 ~ 1390 ~ 3 60 ~ 202737 610 ~ 2 85 ~ 202787
~
6+8794 ~ 203636 ~ 2035 81 ~ 9 90 ~ 5 56 ~ 203571 2 22 ~ 4 50 ' N/A 7+27 9a I 204150 I 204119 I 1073 1 2 89 I 2041 19 ~ 0 00 ~ N/A ~ N/A \ N
~
~
N
Page 1
~
PARCEL A
The North 270 feet of the South 475 feet of the West 200
feet of Tract 97, VERA, accordinq to Plat recorded in
Volume "O" of Plats, Paqe 30, in Spokane County,
Washington;
EXCEPT Mamer Road
PARCEL B :
The South 475 feet of Tract 97, VERA, accvrding to Plat
recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane
County, Washington;
EXCEPT the West 200 feet of the North 270 feet thereof,
ALSO EXCEPT that gart thereof lyinq Southwesterly of the n
NortheasterlY lfne of the Corbin Ditch riqht of way as
same now eaists over and across said Tract 97,
AND ALSO EXCEPT Mamer Road ~
~
TOGETHER with the Northeast 25 feet of the vacated
Spokane Valley Irriqatioa Distzict No 10 canal, over the
South one half of Block 97 of VERA by resolution, 78-
1096, Spokane County, Aashington, that would attach by
operation of law,
EXCEPT Mamer Road
rt nutcu uauic Z-WW • • ~ •
My commissioa expires
RE
FiLE NUMBER
vE0 pATE ~
~ • RE~►B~ED APPgY
i ~
ftLE NUM6ER
p R Aw N s~-
DATT- Y`A &woo
.
~..000' Gop►
~
_
Z ~ ► ~ ` ;j ~ wl
a
i(A
f I
~ 0 l _ .r( e
" - G -.0.
~
0 -k
~ r
' o ~
e ~ • ' [ ~ ~4 I
4~"
~ b ~ ~
~
I w a~ / 4 s~ a~•.
• „ Y ~1 ~ C~ / _ _ _ , - R ~
.
Z ~ o w 33 o
C.A 1
.0~► I N u' ~
.
s r~~ c~ ~ w I~' ~J
~ _JL70
la
i
cc►
.
►
o a, L
-
1
7 .
4► +J
~ r
0 0 - -
0
.
ACTION 5 SCREEN ANFO USERID INQ
ASSESSOR'S INFORMATION DATA SCREEN
JURISDICTION= 11 YR- 96 ROLL= RE PARCEL= 45104 0210
OWNER ( CUSTOM 1031, INC ~ FIELD BOOK 00651A OP
STREET ~ 001500 W 4TH AVE #511 ~ ACO
ADDRESS ~ SPOKANE WA 99204 ~ ACTV STAT A
I ~ EXMP EXMO
SITUS ~ 001614 N MAMER RO ~ ADDO N SASS Y
AOORESS I SPO TAX DISTRICT TD1400 ~ PROP 1070
LEGAL VERA
PT OF TR97. THAT PTN OF S 475 FT OF TR97 LYG N OF IRR CANAL
R/W, EXC W 200FT OF N 270FT SUBJ TO SPOK CfILFAX TRANS LINE
ASMT TOTAL MKT-LD CLS-LD BLDG-1 OTHER 0/R METHOD
BOE/SBTA A
FINAL ASMT 117,100 115.400 0 0 1,700 N
$EXEMPTIONS 0
TAXABLE 117.100
SALE- 19e6 9501 3238 DATE 09 29 95 INST WD TRAN B PRICE 2959000
SALE- 1906 DATE INST TRAN PRICE
4kn
~
~
~
~
ACTION S SCREEN ANFO USERID INQ
ASSESSOR'S INFORMATION DATA SCREEN
]URISDICTION= 11 YR= 96 ROLL= RE PARCEL= 45104 0202
O1nINER ~ CUSTOM 10319 INC ~ FIELD BOOK 00651A OP
STREET ~ 001500 W 4TH AVE #511 ~ ACO
ADDRESS ~ SPOKANE WA 99204 ~ ACTV STAT A
I I ExiwP ExMO
SITUS ~ 001616 N MAMER RD ~ ADDO N SASS Y
ADDRESS ~ SPO TAX DISTRICT TD1400 ~ PROP 1110
LEGAL VERA PT OF B97 N270FT OF W200FT OF 5475FT SUBJ TO SPOK
COLFAX TRANS LN1 ESMT
ASMT TOTAL MKT-LD CL5-LD BLDG-1 OTHER O/R METHOD
BOE/SBTA A
FINAL ASMT 1199400 40,500 0 74.900 4,000 N
$EXEMPTIONS 0
TAXABLE 119,400
SALE- 1% 9501 3238 DATE 09 29 95 INST WD TRAN B PRICE 295,000
SALE- 1% 8125 2196 DATE 12 04 81 INST TRAN M PRICE 2009000
~
/ J
v✓
V
/
~
~
ACTION S SCREEN ANFO USERID INQ
ASSESSOR'S INFORMATION DATA SCREEN
]URISDICTION= 11 YR= 97 ROLL= RE PARCEL= 45104 0201
OWNER ~ CUSTOM 1031. INC ~ FIELD BOOK 00651A OP
STREET ~ 1500 W 4TH AVE #511 ~ ACO
ADDRE55 ~ SPOKANE WA 99204-1639 ~ ACTV STAT A
I I EXMP EXMO
SITUS ~ 001618 N MQ►MER RD ~ ADDO N SA55 Y
ADDRESS ~ SPO TAX DISTRICT TD1400 ~ PROP 1104
LEGAL VERA PT OF B97 EXC 5475 FT SUB7 TO SPOK COLFAX TRANS LN1
ESMT EXC HWY
ASMT TOTAL MKT-LD CLS-LD BLDG-1 OTHER 0/R METHOD
BOE/SBTA A
FINAL ASMT 40,900 139900 0 27,000 0 N
$EXEMPTIONS 0
TAXABLE 40,900
SALE- 1% 9600 3277 DATE 03 18 96 INST WD TRAN C PRICE 1729500
SALE- 1q6 7511 7879 DATE 06 18 75 INST TRAN * PRICE 159000
1+
J.R. BoNNETTENGvvEERiNG
CIIll. &S?'RULTURAL I'JVGINCCltIN~'.JVONSUG77NG
9306N NEiVPORTHlGhf11"AY
5!''OAANE 1t+A 99218
(509) 468-7626
t
ORA/NAGE STUDY
~
fOf
~
~ oFFicIaL PueLic MocuMENr
IN"ND COMIVIERCE PARK SPOKANE COUNTY ENGlNEER S QFFICE
SpoCarte 1NA 0 -
PRaECr #
St1BMTTAI 4
RMRA! TO G`OUNTY ENGiR1L-ER
tor '
~ IBIONN
INLAND CONSTRUCTlON Was
SPOKANE WASHINGTON
J
y 9wo ~
soAp~ ~30693 ~O tv~4
~SS~~NAL
MAY 1996
JRSE Job No 96124 +
~s 1aa
K ~ - -
1NLAND COMMERCE PARK
ORAINAQE STUDY
JRBE JOB NO 96124
6/12/96
IMPERVIOUS AREA
BASIN Street Length Street Area Misc Area Resid Impero Total Area
~ftA 21 (ft"Z) Ift"21. ~
_1 _ 0 28,300 4 0. . 29300
2 0 27 085 0 0 - 27,085
3 0 13 910 0 0 13,910 ~
4 0 11,027 - 0 0 11,027
TOTAL 0 81,322 d 0 0- 81,322
, . 1
UYIANDCOMAERCEPARK
pRAINAGEBNDY
,IR6E106110 OOft/
.
Sam
I I I 1 I I- I I 1 I I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PARAMETERS ,
F _
BASIN TOTALAREN IMPERV AREA OVERLAND FL01N I GUTTER F181N TOTAL ftOW BA81N
t0l qeroe R ! Aeiee Ct L1(A) N1GU ( _ 4Sl(A) 116) N118) ~ 81(B) Tc 'l Zt xi n s A(Unk) I IMP(UnIt) R V TtQW Odpih QePA Te~totaQ I(UnA) C(link) OaCI'A
1 _
170
1 1,06~ I 115 4 AIXi 04 _ 158 6 0016 ( 002 0873 1 8 2fi1 1 1 Q 101 318 - U4Q 219 u i
2 34 OJ9 2'Y062 D _ 0~ ~ b ~ Oa ~ Q.005 ~ 6 04 ~ 0 I a00 423 500 804 0016 I d 740 1 9121 I 0~1 I Z47 I 2.86 0.161 n7.Q7 _ 3.1b I 073 1.8112
-3 035 13,5i0 032 080 5 U4 TOGD Q 0.4 i 0 0. b00 0016 052 R441 7040 0.0~1- 2.~ ~W 41~ 0TB 318 064 0.92 3
~ u` ba t o - _ S. 8 ~b 0.1+f5 0 12 4 = 0~ a e
~ M I I I I I I - I I~ ( I I I I I I I I I I I- -
NpTE See pyt,kuy goapatrlnq caloiGa9or~ ta mare UtlartrmUon ~ I I I ( I I I lii I I I I I I I 1 I I = I I 1 I
i
1
1
1
1
0
~
1
f
i
{
l
2
BOYVSTRINO METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DEStON) pRpJECT 98124 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minutes)
DETENI'ICi4 BASIN OE&IGIv 8A31N 1
REVIEWER MCNI Tc (overtend) Tc (guttaf) Areas C A C
NUMBER OF DRYIMELLS PROPOSED DATE 22 May48
0 Stngle (iyype 1) 1 Double (lype 9) Cf o 015 L2 a 156 112 010 0111856
Totsl Area (eatt )(see H1) 179 Z1 a SO 0 67 0.90 0 6DSJ72
Time of Cone, (celo )(see H1) Soo L1(A) - 0 ZZ a 6 0 00 0 00 0
Composke'C (catc )(sso H1) 0 40 N(A) - 04 eo o 000 000 0
Time of Cone (min) 5 00 S(A) Q 0005 n~ 0 018 0 00 000 0
Ama (Acm) 179 s R 0 02 000 0 00 0
C' Foctat 0 40 Te (A) Q 000 d= C 118B 000 000 0
Stree3 Aroa (sq ft) ZgpQO
Impwvious Area (sq R) 29300 Toml A Comp C
Voluma Prov(dad 208 1336 stotm 1448 Lt(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 101 179 040
Outliow (cls) I N(B) a 04 Tc(A+8) a 000
Aree C Fodot 0 72 S(8) ' 0 Q=C I An 228
o~ . . --°a a.,•• TC(tot.) = 5 OD Q(est 2 21
ai 02 13 #A #5 06 #7 TC (B) n 00 Intensily a 318
Tfine Time Intensiry Q dev V In V oN Sbrage Am 0873252
InC Inc Re9 d) Wp a 9sD60
(min ) (sec ) pnJhr) (cfs) (cu ft ) (cu fl.) (cu fk) R = o o8s2
(#t 80) (A C20) (OuU #1) ("G) V= 2 60
ax saaaa naaaaaaaaaa a~naa t +*cn= aaeeoL._- T6 (t0taQ = Tc (overland) + Tc (gutter) TCoU) a 101
5 QO 30000 318 2.18 917 30000 817 TC (ava" = CY(1.1 NJS^0 3)"0 6) Q(est) a 227
Ga01S
S 300 318 2.28 917 340 811 L1= Leegth of Ovoriand Flow Holdiyg a 563
10 sw 2.24 1.61 1128 600 528 N= hidion iaclor ot ovedand Aoa ( 4 ior average grass caver)
15 9w 171 127 1272 900 372 S= averege SIOpe of OVetlBnd Raw
20 1200 145 104 1354 1100 1 S4 Ta (gufto n Latlgm (R)1Velodly (Rdsez )!60
25 1500 1.21 087 1390 1500 110 B a Bonom Yvtdih oi guttot or ditch
30 1800 104 075 1418 1800 381 t1 o inverse of aoss stope orw ot ditch
35 2100 021 0.65 1437 2100 -663 Z2 = Imsrse of aross slope two of ditch
40 2400 0.82 0,59 1472 2400 938 a= aeptn ornaW m~(esdmate a,eck estimate wit, Flow)
45 2700 4 74 0 33 1467 2700 1213 Aro8 a d B+d"2P2 (Z1*Z2)
SO 3000 0 68 0 49 1513 3000 1487 WetEed perbneter o B d+(l1sln(atn(121))+l1sin(efn(11Z2)I)
55 3300 0 84 0 46 1582 3300 1138 Hydrswllc Radius a R- AraalWettad Perin►otot
60 3800 0 81 0 44 1820 3800 1980 VeloaUy a 148@!n R" 687 s" 5
65 3900 0 60 0 49 1722 3900 2118 Fbw = Velocily'Araa
10 4200 0.58 0 42 1780 4200 2410 n Q 0 016 for asphalt
TS 4500 0 58 0 40 1848 4500 2891 s= longdudfnal slope M gutter
80 4800 0.53 0.98 1864 4800 2336
85 5100 0.52 0.37 1940 5100 -3160
90 5400 050 0.36 1873 5400 -3427
95 5700 049 0.35 1039 5700 -=1
100 6000 0 48 034 2101 s00 -3688
ORAINNOE POND CALCULATIONS
Requlred grassy srwle portd sorege volume
a(RIperA0u814f0tf X.S tflJ 12 (IIAL a 1221 EU fL
prarided 1338 eu A. OKl
DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS 10 YFr4R DE81GN STORM
Msximum seoroge mquired by 6owstrirg a ¢11 Cu R.
provided 1448 cu R OKI
Number and ypo af Drywells Requlrod = 0 Single 1 Double
9
80WSTRINO METH00 (TEN YFJ4R STORM DESION) pRQJECT 96124 TIME QF CQNCENTRATtON (mfnuubes)
DE1 EM10N BASM DESION PA81N 2
REVIEINER MCM Te (ovethand) Tc (gutter) Areas "C` A C
NUMBER OF ORYWELLS PROPOSED DATE 2240ay-96
1 Single (type A 0 Doublo (y~e 6) Ct= 015 L2 = 423 617 010 0016628
Tot1 Atea (calc )(See H1) 019 Z1 = SD 0 62 0 90 0559607
Tlme of Conc (eak )(see Ht) 500 L1(A) = 0 Z2 = 6 0 00 000 0
Composite C(tale)(sseHt) 073 N(A) a 04 B= 0 000 0 00 0
Time o! Conc (min) S 00 S(f) = 0 005 n= 0 018 000 000 0
(Acres) 0 79 s a 002 000 0 00 0
C Foetor 0 73 Tc (A) = 0 00 d= 01626 000 0 00 0
Sbvet Area (sq R) 21085
(mpeMaus Area (sq ft~ 27 085 Total A Comp C
Volume Provided 208 1309 stonn 1569 Lt(B) ~ 0 Tc (gu) a 2 87 019 ty 73
Outliow (afs) 03 N(8) a 04 Tc(A+8) z 0 00
Area C Factot 0 58 S(B) = 0
====C---== . ____._Mmmm _ = Tc(tat ) ~ 5 00 Q=C I A= 183
#1 02 03 04 #5 #6 #1 Tc (B) ~ 00 Intensfty = 1319
Timu Time Intensfry Q dev Y in V out Stomge p(est) a 182
Inc Inc Req'd)
(min ) (sec) IinJh► ? (c!s) (cu A ) (cu ft ) (cu ft ) A = Q J9~$5
(01 80) (A C10) (Outl'#2) (05-ft) 6NP ~ 91,207
an~-- - ==oaaaaoc a=C=oaaaa aea_ z TC nOtAl) = Te (ovurland) + Tc (Auttor) R° 00812
5 00 30000 318 183 737 9000 647 Tc (overlarcQ a Ct (Ll NIS^0 5)AO 6) V= 2 46
5 3~ 318 1.83 737 90 647 L1- Length ot dvertand Flow Q(est) fl 182
10 600 2 24 129 608 190 726 N a frMion feetor of avedand dasv ( 4 for average gress caver)
15 9w 1 77 102 1022 270 1S2 Sc avetage slope ot ovadand flow Ho(ding z 1507
20 1200 145 0 84 1688 360 728 tc (guter) - Leno (ft.)Nelxiry (ftUse0160
25 15m 121 070 1111 450 887 B n 8attom vndth of gsitEer or ditch
30 1600 104 0 80 1140 540 600 ZI - Inverse ot cross stope ono of dfth
35 2100 0 91 0 52 1155 630 525 Z2 - Inverw of cross slop 1wa ol ditch
40 2400 0 62 047 1182 720 482 d- dapth otftaw in gufter (estimaEo eheck estimate with Flo*
45 2700 074 0 43 1195 810 395 Area a d'B+d"212 (Z1+22)
50 3000 06$ 0.39 1215 900 315 Welted pedmetet=Bd+(lfsin(afi(121))flJsfn(atn(122)))
85 3300 0 64 0.37 1255 890 265 Hydrauqa Radius a R pArealWetted Pedmeter
so 3500 061 0,95 1301 1030 221 Velodty II 1488fi R" 66711s" 5
65 3900 060 0.95 1364 1170 214 Flow a VetooNy'Atea
70 4200 O 58 0 33 1438 1260 178 na 0 018 tor aspla9t
rS 4500 0.56 0.322 1485 1350 135 s= longriudind slope a1 guaer
80 4800 053 031 1497 1440 57
65 5100 052 0.30 1559 1530 29
90 5400 0 SO 029 1585 1820 .35
85 5100 0 49 0.28 1838 1710 72
100 8000 0 48 0.28 1886 1800 112
~ a aCU= - , -
orwNaoE PoNO cAt.cwmoNs
Requirod 9rasY swale pond sEorage volume
a Impendons Ares x S In! tZ In1R a 1129 eu It
provlded- 1309 cu R CKI
DRYWEII REQUIREMENTS -10 YEAR DESION StORM
Maxlmum storaga requlred by Bawstrfng a 't cu R
provtded 1559 cu R OK!
Number and lype of prywells Requhed = 1 Single 0 Double
4
BOWSTRINO METH00 (TEN YEAR STORM DEStON) pROJECT 88124 TIME 4F CONCENTRATION (minutes)
pETENTION BPSIN DESlGN BAS(N 9
REVfEWER klCM Te (overland) TC (gutw) Areas C A C
NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PRBPOSED DATE. 22 May 98
1 Single (type A 0 Oouble (typo 8) Ctn 01S L2 ~ 98 0 00 010 0002695
Total Area (eale )(see H 1) 035 Zt ~ 50 0 32 090 0287397
Time oi ConC (calC )(see H1) 5.00 L1(!) = 0 Z2 n 6 000 0 00 0
Composite C' (ealc )(sae H1) 0 84 N(A) = 04 8 z 0 000 000 0
Time ol Conc (min) S OQ S(A) = 1 n= ~10t 6 0 00 0 00 0
Area (Aces) 0 35 s= 0 02 0 00 000 0
C Faetor 0 84 Te (A) = 0 00 d= 01255 000 000 0
Street Area (sq R) 13910
ImpervEous Area (sq R.) 13910 Tctal A Camp C
Volume Providsd 208 593 storm 898 L1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0 79 035 084
Oulflow (ofs) 03 N(B) = 04 Tc(A+8) Q 0 00
Area C Fector 0 29 S(B) = 0 0=C I An 0 92
=~C== Tc(tot) = S 00 q(est ) a 091
#1 92 03 #4 s5 88 g7 Tc (B) ~ 00 IntensVty = 318
Time Time Intensiy Q dev V in V out Storage q o 0441007
Inc inc Req d) yVp ~ 70396
(min ) (sea 1 pn ihr ) (cfs) (Cu ft.) (cu R) (cu R) Ra 00626
(91 60) (A Ci #3) (QUb *012) V a 207
s ~ - Tc (totaQ = tc (overland) + To (guutt+er) Tc{gu} ~ 079
500 30000 318 0 92 371 9000 281 Tc (averland) = Ct'(L1 NiS"O.S)"a 6) Q(esq = 0 91
~+a0 1s
5 300 318 092 371 90 281 Lt a Length of Overland Flow Holding = 3 48
10 BQfl 2 24 0 85 456 t80 276 N II hidlon tador ci overland flow ( 4 fo► everoge grass cover)
15 900 177 0 51 $14 270 244 S Q averoge alope of overland Oaw
20 1200 145 0 42 548 360 188 Tc (gutber) = Lergth (ft,)Neloeiry (RJssc )f60
25 1500 121 035 5S2 450 112 B a Bottom wPda► of guuer ot dbh
30 1800 104 0 30 574 540 34 21 a invarse of aass elope ane of ditch
35 2100 0 91 0.28 581 830 49 Z2 = Imreise af ctm elope Iwo ai dltch
40 2400 0.82 024 595 720 125 d s deplh of (iav►r in gutter (eshmete aheck est(mate with Floa+)
45 2700 074 0 21 801 810 209 14rea a d B*d"112 (Zt*Z2)
SO 3000 068 024 812 8G'0 288 WemedRerlmetero8d*(1lsin(aM(121))+1Fsln(efi(122)))
55 3300 0 64 019 632 990 -358 Ftyd►aulic Radius c R z AreafWettfad Perlmeter
60 3600 0 81 018 655 1080 425 Velodly n 14861n R" 687 s" 5
65 3900 060 017 697 1170 -473 Flow a VelaWArea
70 4200 0 58 017 724 1280 ti536 n = 0 016 for lsphaft
75 450D 0 56 016 748 1350 -802 s- longitudirtal slope of gultar
80 4800 0 53 0 15 754 1440 486
85 5100 0,52 01S 785 1530 74S
90 5400 0.50 015 798 1820 4122
95 5700 0 49 014 825 1710 -88S
100 6000 0 48 014 850 1800 950
4 7O ~Oi .L._._.._,..
ORAINAGE POND CALCULATiONS
Required grossy swale pand storege volume
a U1p9Ni0US AN08 x S ir1112 IeJR, a 580 CU R.
ptaAded 593 eu tt OK!
DRYWELL REGUIREMENT8 10 YEAR DESIQN 3TCRM
Mwdmum stomge requited by Bcwslrirg _ 281 cu R
pmvided 898 eu R. OKl
Number end typo of OryMrells Requtred = 1 Single 0Doublo
5
BOWSTRINO MEtH00 (TEN YEAR STORM OESIGN) pROJECT 98124 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minu0es)
t)ETENTtON BASIN DESIGN BASIN 4
REUIEWER MCM To (overlend) Tc (guCeo Areas C A C
NUMBER OF DRYWELl3 PROPQSED DATE 22 May-96
1 Single Oype A 0 Dauble (type 8) Ct= O 18 l2 a 52 000 015 0
Total IUeo (cale)(see H1) 0.25 Z1 ~ SO 0.15 0.90 0227831
Time ot Conc (cak )(sse Ht) 500 Lt - 0 Z2 = 6 0 00 0 00 0
Composke C(oale )(see Ht) 0 90 N(A) - 04 B a 0 0 00 0 00 0
Tlme of Conc (min) S 00 S(A) = t n= 0 016 0 00 0 00 0
Area (Aares) 025 s= 0 02 0 00 000 0
C Fadat 0 80 Te (A) z 000 d= 01145 0 00 000 0
StreetRrea (sq R.) 11027
ImpeMous Area (sq fL) 11021 Totel A Comp C
Valume Provided 208 645 stotm 1161 L1(B) ~ 0 Tc (gu) = 0 45 0.25 0 90
Outliaw (cfs) 03 N(9) = 04 Tc(A+B) = 0 00
Ares C Factor 0 23 S(B) = 0 0=C I f= 012
_ o==oC"=== - , Tc(tat ) = 5 00 a(est ) = 0 71
A1 #2 33 #4 a5 #8 #7 Tc (B) = 00 Intensity = 318
Timo Time intensiry Q dev V in V out Storage A= 0367087
Inc Inc Req c) 1NP = 64226
(min ) (sec ) (in,fir ) (cfs) (w R) (cu ft ) (cu ft ) R = 00572
(#1 Gfl) (A C#3) lOutf 112) (OS-06) V z 195
- =C= Tc (totaD = Tc (overlant) +Tc (guttfer) Tc(gu) = 0 45
5 00 30000 318 0 72 291 9000 201 Te (overlend) = Ct'(li NIS"0 5)"0 8) Q(est) ~ 0 71
Ct=015
5 300 318 012 281 90 201 L1 Q Length o! Overland Flow kolding = 185
10 600 2 24 0 S1 358 t80 178 N a Mctlon kcWr of ovarland flow ( 4 for average grass cover)
15 900 177 0 40 404 210 134 S aaverage aloRe of overland lisw
20 1200 145 0 33 430 360 70 Tc (gulter) = Longth (A.)/Naloc►ty (Nsee )160
25 1500 121 028 442 450 -8 B a Battam whlth of guker or ditch
30 1800 144 0.24 451 540 .89 Z1 a Irnerse of cmss slope one of ddCh
35 2100 021 021 451 630 173 Z2 = lnvorse of erosa alape Mro of ditch
40 2400 0 82 019 467 720 253 d= depth ot flow in gutter (eatlmeb eheek esUmate wNh Flow)
45 2700 0 74 017 472 81b .338 Ales a d B+d"2l2'(Z1t71)
SO 3000 0 68 015 481 800 419 Watted perimetFx= B d;(llsin(aht(1JZ1))+ lfsin(aln(i1Z2)))
55 3300 0 64 015 498 990 -494 Hydtaullc Radlus a R= ArealWetted Perimeter
60 3640 0 81 014 514 1080 -566 Velocity =14881n R" BeTs" 5
85 9900 0 60 014 547 1170 -623 Flaw a VelociVArea
70 4200 0 58 013 588 1260 -692 n a 0 018 tor asphalt
75 4300 0 66 013 581 1350 763 s a longitudlnei slope of guftt
80 4800 0.53 012 592 1440 -848
85 5100 0 52 0 12 618 1530 -914
90 5400 0 50 011 821 1820 -993
95 S700 0 49 0 1) 848 1710 1082
100 8000 0 48 0 11 667 1800 1133
DRAINAQE POND CALCULATI0NS
Requited gtassy swale pand sbotsge votuma
= Impervlous Area x.S InJ 12 In!!t. = 459 cu R,
provtded 845 eu R. OK!
ORYWELL REDUIREMENTS 10 YEAR DESIGN BTORM
Maximum atomge requirod by Bowabing ■ 201 eu R
prcvtdcd 1161 eu ft OK)
Number and type cf Oryuvelb Requlred s 1 Single 0 DoublO
e
1
♦
T
~
,
`
AS M pp ~
A~~ AGE. ~ 100 , ~ ~
1 pR - SCp&E
~
s
~ SIµE dFGaN
npICA~ ~ ~ ~ i
F~.OW RA • 1 , 1~
~4f~`~'~'~
I t
1 r +
9-3
~ Q ,ti► ~f7
, ~ ~ ~
1 ~
~
~
s '
:
i~
~
~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC
November 2, 1995
W 0 No 95649
Doug Busko RECEIVED
Spokane County Engineering Dept
W 1026 Broadway N 0 V 0 6 Wo
Spokane, WA 99260
RE Ialand Construction Site SaOKANE COUHTY ErJGINEER
Dear Mr Busko
Enclosed please find the plan and profile ahowing the sight distance for the
revised driveway location for Inland Coastruction's site on Mamer Road The
dietance for the northbound vehicle was adjusted to account for the grade on
Mamer at this point
These sight distances meet AASHTO and Spokane County standards Furthermore we
feel that this driveway has been relocated to it's optimum place on Maaner Road
If you have any questions, or need additional information, please let me know
Siacerely,
N +
ckov~ ol 6 v Ann L Winkler, P E
cc Robert L Townsend, Ialand Constructioo Co
~ 707 West 7th o Suite 200
Spokane Washmgton 99204
509 458-6840)
FAX 509-458 6844
, ~
T ~
~ ■ ~ ~ 7 ~ 1 .
2070 W oFfiCiaL PueUG oOCUNiCVT W k
. ~ . - SROKANE GOU~t~IENGNVEER`S ~FFiCt - oF W'~
~
W
W 0 OR ~ NAL y
2060 o z ~ M PROJEGT # •&~i.~
SUBMIML #
z & 9'S 3
~ ~ ~ RETUWN TO COUNTY ENOINEER ss~ G~
2050 p y,w . . . ~ IoNaL
ExtSnNG COUNnr a DXPIRES bi t I4N3
,.J
M 2040 Wa° qt°FU N ° .
0
. ~ a
~ 2030
G
W
? Q
o a
~ ~
2020 LL, z U-
~
p ~ O' W ~
Wu u.& a ~
.
2010 woa a
. . » . . . 0
»1~♦ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ a
~
♦
1@
NOTES N ~ ~ o
ZOOO » 1, A~S to PRoPpm W14. ~ eY ~NAIE ~ N z z° _
oRt&wAr N
2 DRVMAY WILL SIDPE ?Jr OR LESS f8R BO a
9A~CCI( OF IMERSE~TION AT M{~lER ROAD
. 1990 ~ 3. 4ItiERaECTIO14 IMu► 8E at a O0 MGLE -
N 4VVl N 1~`~~~~
4 STOPPINC SIGHT qISTANCE SHOWN IS FOR 30 M P H SPEED
_ 200
$ ; „ 2 3 ~ 5 6 . L
/100 w 7 1
SIGHT DISTANCE AT ~ INLAND
' I N LAN D C O N STR U CTI O N C 0. D R IVEWAY PAC~Fic
ENaINEERIHG ~ P RO FI LE VI EW 0 F MAM E R ROAD 747 west ,th Suite 200 (509) 458-6840
111MA ~ J~ Spokane WA 99244 fAX (549) 458-6844,
r
7
. ~
s~
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC
October 16, 1995
W O No 95649
RECEIVED
Fat Harper Q C j 17 199b
Spokaae County Englneers
W 1026 Broadway SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
Spokane, WA 99260
RE Inland Construction's access onto Mamer Road
Dear Pat
Based upon conversations with Robert Townsend of Inland Copstruction, we understaad that you
are concerned with the location ot their dnveway access to Mamer Rodd Todd Whipple and
I met with Mr Townsend and discussed his slte plan, present dnveway locahon aud development
goals for the site Based upon these discussions, Mr Tnwnsend is planning to move his
dnveway access to Ma.mer Ruad to near the northera edge of the property Dae to Spolcaue
County reqwrements, a ten foot buffer from the northera property Lne was recommended to him,
and our analysLS of his dnveway access is based upon thLs mformahon We also based our
analysis on a thuty foot wide dnveway mto the site
At this lccation a.nto the parcel, the County reqwrement for a 2% grade into the site can eascty
be met, aad all County reqwrements for grades and sight ciistances on Mamer Road witlun the
uifluence of the mtersechon are met
Attached is a profile of Mamer Rnad along the frontage of ttus parcel wluch demonstrates ttus
compuance It shows the location of the clriveway previously proposed for dus site, as well as
the aew locaUon of the dnveway and the grades associdtecl with it Please let me know tf you
have any questions or need addltional mformation
Siacerely,
1
ckoo-14~ d 15)W
AnA L Wuikler, P E
enc
cc Robert L Townsead, Inlaad Construcaoa Co
707 West 7th Suite 200
Spokane Washington 99204
509-458 6840
FAX 509-458 6844
~
2070 W v
w y~ r N M • M w ti p ti w ,
~
Z
' 2060 0
. N. . ~
I N z~
2 0
2050 ~ N
~
2040
. . ~ . ~ ~ .
a
0
Q o a
2034 Q ~
' a N N M Y z Z QQ ~
~
8 >-Z
iA§ Q Q~~
.
2020 ~ c $ U. J LA'~ Q
~ . . . . U. o- ~ o a ` 0 ~U"
W 0 cc O
NO~TE$ j3W go °wW°~a o~
2010 . 1 A~~~S$ TD PROPQRTY WIL.~, QQ OY PRIVAT~ i m.
DRIVEWAY cn~ w D W
hvoi 5~E~ ~
2000 2 DRIVEWAY WILL SLOPE 2% OR LESS FOR 60' oa o Cm 0
BAC,'K Of '1NTERS"ECTION AT MAMER RO'AD • ` p0 zz M z
3 INTERSEC~'ION WILL BE AT A 90 ANGLE 1990
4 GRADES AND SIGNT DISTANCES- AT NE11V DRIVtWAY LOCATION
WILL MEET SPOKANE COUNTY IiRBAN COLLECTOR ARTERIAL
STANDARDS FROM TABLE 3 01 IN SPOkANE COUNTY STANDARDS
3 4 _ 6_
J
~ ~ ♦ ~ IHLAND ~
I N LAN D C 0 N STR U CTI O N PACIFIC
PROFILE OF MAMER ROAD ENQIHEERINQ
707 West 7th Suite 200 (509) 458-6840
` - 10 ~a Spokase WA 99204 FAX (509) 458-6844J
~ J.R. BomvETTENGiNEE"NG
e -
CML & S?FtUCTUXALBNGlNEMlNGICONSULTING
9306 JV NI'sWFORT HIGWAY
SP'OJ~'iW8 IYA 99218
(509) 468 7626
~
PavEMFnrr cac.cucA77oNs
~
~
MAMER RoAD IMPRov~~ENrs
~
Inland Commerce Park
~ Spo6ne WA
' "or oFFiciA. Pueuc oocuMENT
SPOKANE CQUNTY EWttqEE,~ S of~Zg
~ AI
~~~1"'~17(t~}~~
D CONSTRUCTION ~ ,Fs o
INLAN
SPOKANE WASNINCTON
~
~o 50693
G1S7E~
Jun% 1996 FSS~~NA 1.
JRBE Job No 98124
~ 1W~ ~ r
e
.WS 24
r J R BONNETT ENGINEERING
9306 North Newport Highway s"~ "O ~ oF
SPOKANE WA 99218 CALCUI.ATED BY --J~ oATE
TEL (509) 468 7626 r
FAX (509) 468 7534 CHECKED 8Y oaTE
SCALE
~
~~i- M ~ ~o r~ .~fi7~1' ~~2~ r/Ew1 H✓l~'
14ss u TAt-f-fr-f c. i/o L- uw►Ns - P&L 17is 7";410
en /r~40)1
='N~-~ .z ¢
Trr-t gua yA" = *1~, & 4u sF
7'.',e~v END =(1037~ ~5G G4) fpT-
~066 !9;0r-
fEac~STlPSl~ r>eJt LoeMC`O/i S
C~wTzie- OfjCJlrt " ( 3 ) 5 e APPeox 4O06 Sle ~
- Cc. S I►~~1~"G, ~-t~E oitf c f
?anAM &o t, ^,Re* 4sio Sf
n
- Ua ~kL- Gc-aA-L- 4,M~ At-&5 QFirCE .
TbT14C%- r3 '_k'~J4 *A*4 ~ 4600 gr
'j"oTw%-- 6f-f-iCi A"-p► = 2(0100 S P
77a, P f"I'oY1,00 SF r (2f?0") _ 6 420 190 T'
-(f 9) c~l rJ+n t F ~A M t l y ~G Mf'~
= C 9 sS'~ 14, = i 3 4 r~ a
~N~/S007$
M ~
:
~vTUAeF IJi cc-go Y AlaM `
FS dJ~i cE
777m- l3 c. D q f+R-64 ` 40D0 SIL' lAs SJ w+ Lr'*)
TW-P Elics Aft sf = (744 = 9 ~ ,~or
)r:!,00,r u e& a✓EceIpmeWT ~IgS S U► r~~ - Z~ou ~ r
)
T n4t. y''2A y4~ c ,04o f/d 4 f 904- 1100
v6z~~~. _ ~~~s + Z 2~3~
R' !ilJt't 1l~tto Mtst Gt iGrx+' O! tN I041NIlDMi3EU
.Oe 16 /2 9- .
~ J R BONNETT ENGINEERING
~
9306 North Newport Highway S"E~ "O oF
SPOKANE iNA 99218 Gq1,CUlATEO BY dATE
/lok TEl (509) 468 7626
FAX (509) 468 7534 cHecKEo sY OATE
scaLE
A-r/1 HL-- I~o r~EtT Tr~Pko VE wt E n1 ~
OA VC- Vot- N 'r ~E S 14 ~ - 20 4&5 161✓ L ~ /gk.`
,91 L A e~g g ( PM s~_s C441 s "AP)
,,D/C ►-A ir io~7 P C u tj ~ F ic-0 )
ern P(,s, o0o Pf J . ~PE-~. ~»o~ a►~ Cov,~ r3- r~~,r
G M C 12, o00 fs vA
ARTE#:~iRL PA ✓EMENT
74,,/c-R~Lc P!F't/E n~ f n~ T l A 3 S A ~E2 ~oL1'►~J E G vu r*r
,~aQrr f '¢400 140T
~
Le.f r >r1hTe- ' Z'f ? 1 1t T) i p IL
r AS~ /-r►vEMEn1T ~&S 1,~-N 1 A I A f TF-P-l
~Lena~t. ►T'r go7,m
~'t'f1'~ C R~~ ~E v i A-`►' r~~J S• = Q~
~
PP%1tvAEar §f-,-vlcrAa,L ir; F< PtI, = 4 Z (iJr/ M
,
1
J.R. BoNNETTEivGiNEE"NG
~
JCML & STRUC7iIl7ALENGINBERINGJC0NSUL77NG
9306 N NBWPoURT lIlGfMAY
SPOK4N8 WA. 99318
(509) 468 7626
STRFET CROSS GRADE CALCULATIONS
of
~
' MAIVIER ROAfl IIVIPR01/EIVIENTS
Iniand Commerce Park
Spolaane WA
~
OFFtClAL PUBUC OOCUklENT `
SPOKAWE CQUAITY ENGIMEEA S OFFIQE
for 08
4G. NN14
PROJECT 0 -
suBMlTTAL N Z
RMRN TO CQU~NTY~E PN
NG EER
-1 ~ wO
~P pF ~h►i,y ~
lNLAIIfD COIVSTRUCTION
SPOKANg WASHfNGTON
~o
~
~p~ c S~~
FSS~ONAL
3 L
June 1986
JRBE Job No 96124 ~IAEB 10-3' IL -
r
MAMER ROAD - Street Cross Grade Calculations
DISTANCE ASPHALT ASPHALT
CENTERLINEICENTERLINEI EOER ITO EDGE OF I CROSS I FLOWLINE I DISTANCE TO I CROSS I
STATION ~ ELEVATION I ELEVA710N I PAVIN6 I SLOPE JELEVATIONI, FLOWLINE I SLOPE ITOC ELEV
ft ft ft (0/0) 1 ft ft (0/0) 1 ft
0+6135 198262 1983 02 13 08 -3 06 198302 0 00 NIA N/A
0+90 ~ 198358 ~ 198409 ~ 1273 ~-4 01 ~ 198419 ~ 2 50 ~ NUA ~ NIA
1+2168 ~ 198492 ~ 198481 ~ 1060 ~ 104 ~ 198467 ~ 7 00 ~ 2 00 ~ N/A
1+35 79 ~ 198663 ~ 198555 ~ 1110 ~ 012 ~ 198528 ~ 8 90 ~ 303 ( 198578
1+52.72 ~ 198651 ~ 198644 ~ 1170 ~ 0 60 ~ 198619 ~ 8 30 ~ 3 01 ~ 198669
1+68 02 ~ 198723 ( 1987 03~ 1180 ~ 169 ~ 198678 ~ 820 ~ 3 05 ~ 198728
2+0019 ~ 198855 ~ 198827 ~ 1210 ~ 2 31 ~ 198803 ~ 790 ~ 3 04 ~ 198853
2+19 31 ~ 198920 ~ 198902 11 10 ~ 162 198875 ~ 8 90 ~ 303 ~ 198925
2+31 12 ~ 198980 ~ 198940 ~ 11 10 ~ 3 60 198913 ~ 8 90 1 3 03 ~ 198963
3+0112 ( 199187 ~ 199137 ~ 1110 ~ 4 50 ~ 189116 ~ 8 90 ~ 2 36 ~ 199166
3+28 31 ~ 199301 ~ 199258 ~ 1230 ~ 3 50 ~ 199217 ~ 7 70 ~ 5 32 ~ 199267
3+89 85 ~ 199690 ~ 199617 ~ 1230 ~ 5 93 ~ 199612 ~ 7 70 ~ 0 65 1 199662
4+2109 ~ 1999 80 ~ 199914 ~ 1230 ~ 5 37 + 199900 ~ 7 70 ~ 182 ~ 199960
4+59 47 ~ 200404 ~ 200365 ~ 1270 ~ 3 07 ~ 200335 ~ 7 30 ~ 411 ~ 200385
4+95 09 ~ 200863 ~ 200840 1230 ~ 187 ~ 200817 ~ 7 70 ~ 2 99 1 200867
5+48 21 ~ 201643 ~ 201609 1280 ~ 2 66 ~ 201587 ~ 7 20 ~ 3 06 ~ 201637
5+97 69 ~ 202392 ~ 202342 ~ 1320 J 3 79 ~ 202322 ~ 6 80 ~ 2 94 ~ 202372
6+28 23 ~ 2028 OS ~ 202755 ( 1390 ~ 3 60 ~ 202737 ~ 610 ~ 2 95 ~ 202787
6+87 94 ~ 203636 ~ 203581 ~ 9 90 ~ 5 58 ~ 2035 71 2.22 ~ 4 50 ~ IV/A
7+27 94 J 244150 ~ 204119 ~ 1073 ~ 2 89 ~ 204119 0 00 ~(V/A ~ N/A
y ~
~
`
~ N
~
r
0
"IN
Page 1 ~ N
~
_ J.R. BomvETTENGvv.EERmG
o
~ CM & S'TRUC7URAL BNGIN6ERlNG1IC0NS1LTING
9306 N NBWORTHlCrHWtfY
SPDKANB WA 99218
(509) 968 7626
ORAINAGE ANALYS/S
QFFICIAL PUBUC DOCURAFNT
SPKWAfVE COUpJTY ENGINEER S QF~
~ ~ NAAA.
P"CT #
St1MTTA1. #
6;0 ~
MTtM TO
COU~TY ENG~~dEER
I
~
~
IV1AMER R0AD 1MPR01/EIVIEAI TS '
Inlana commerce Penc
Spokane WA
~
1bi
i
W~NNF~.
~ ~dF Sy~,
INLAND CONSTRUCTION
h
SPOKANF. WASNIIYCTON `
~
'°A o~ 30693
C1STE~
June 1996 ~SS~oNaL
JRBE Job Ho 96124 ~
E~ 1Q-3 - C/(p
2.4 116 s&0s ¢t s
J R BONNETT ENGINEERING SMEUNo ~ oF ~
9306 North Newport Highway
SPOKANE, WA 99218 caLouwTM eY a►rE
TEL. (509) 468 7626 ~
FAX. (509) 468 7534 cHECKn sY cATE
SCALE
~M
60e#t-1,~64e JI NAt- ys,f
Lil.~Oea ✓/ou! 1fjw4 = /o x s~s' - sos~ sf
~Zob" (/oc-✓mE 2-10 lt2
~208" vow"e Pl~d~D~~~ = 5'xC2b t 2~ t q2iL 5~ = 2,35 ~ O,t
IJan af- </p '/✓E~ Pw,/, nl u
d Ae..1a4 6W AA-6,
6~asT"c-a- w.~« G.✓v~- 4u.✓ oGie Td "208 " Po m
r
►
~
,
1 7 N 1 t 6+. S fhA 1 H"f.1 IAFE iQi" aKr
~ 3
1
% ~
:~~nS~~u~~~~~~~iS~n~~~NOa 8 ~ i► O=i~
e ~j'. • 11 ~
2 C A ~ ~ I I "~p ~i C ~
~ r rr A ~ s ~
ol ~
lq ; 00li0000000e 000000000 OONO ~
~ ~~~~5~~~
91
~ ilo
N ~ ~ V dq~ ry~.~u.p1~ ~rg pyyq + ~T w~ ~ 84
o• ~o ~ ~oBS~~i5~8~~oSiS~ ~ ~ °
o P p aa
A 0 wWeil mt.r►11~ ll A ~ Q i
G 7? fil
b~ ~~ea~ iNN 7~ e~ ~ S GS °
ii 1 ~ go° ~ MNs r
g p~ o o =
~ a e Pp Po 0
~ S~ a tD60 O (Da0 N
bi
a~:~i n Z
34
Q y
~ m 1~'tll O" o~Ob 41ap
~ 0 0~ ~ IVA~ ~ OO(IN
l~~ a e~ aooooo0
A
Qa N N
~ ~it~~~ sg~~a 0 p
~
0oo00ov
a`
f ..v
~
o ~ORIZ SCALE '
"m 'o
~
YERT SCALE m"°°
~ w
~IA IM I
> odW
W W ~ W N LJJ
- - - , -i- -
i - - -
1+00 2+00 3+00 4+04 5+00 6+00
SEC 10, T25N, R 44 EWM
SPdUNE 0~1~ 4 Mtl FRAIlE ~ • 70;~ Sf i
a cR►h. a+Ah aEV.1se.e P~~i ~rlE+~)
SIAPE EASE1rIENT OR RETAINWC
SiRUCNRE aS REOInRED
MAX SLOPE ■ 3►t 1V
~M EROSION pAD EwSRNG e
0 ~ ~ ~ - ~M ~ COa7T0UR5
01l 2/'Sri D1L J/St3 i1fP CROSS GUTtER TrPE 2
PER SPOKANE OOUNTY
51D DWC B-la OONDWE
ORAINAOE EASEMENT AROUND Fl.OWUNE iMAU INIERSEC11Qfl
~~a► P~va,c ro ~►a (Iio~ z ia ) rPE "6 Cli~9 a~c wRe a
& GUTiER STA 6+26 23
TMG PA~ MA1CH Ef~SnNG PANNC
~ee~ 4 1290o Ar ~AraEa u►~.
+6o ,9e, 0 1 To~ 'oc ` FLo u~ Pm-4;
~
I( 1~r
Z77 0=- -T7T
p---~ - ~ - ;r
~ `
. KON «,RB 1 .
, & aTiER ~ CENIERUNE CUAB,
INIET 1 r~~a~c~~o~n+tr
sm cwc e-a (oEPREss
CRASS 208 POnO pER 2 ) LE. • I088 73
ER
sPacAne couNrr smS. SEE DTl. 2/ST3 t~ ~ ~ EOCE Of PRQPQSEO
TOTAI RR AREA-NO SF Cox~~~ i 1 aSPHALr aavnrc
~ ~ 1 Qpp 1
I 1 ~
~ EDGE Ci R 0 W _ SAwWi E%IStING EDLE OF + l~ v
pAVpdEN1 FOR 5M401H W~
1 TRAN$Iflal1
+ ' O
e~<<~~ 1 e~►f~~ = 1)04 Id0 cF
STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN ~a.
~ _ o Ax Q
SW O W OO~IOIA~YI~~SN~~ON ON ~ i ~ A, ~A ii.~+T ZA
~ ~
~ ~ t x~ ~ ~ g
~ ~ ~ ~ • o ~
~s .00000000000000e0u000~j0 p ; ~~~Y.r.r.~ .►.~IN~~~~YI~~OI~ ~ ~ v ~ OO~~ 2
a111~QIQ/~1~0/mr .r.~
' 8~~~~~N~~~~i~:Tl~~~~~~ ~ ~~f Pa~
~ I r:~ ~y~ r~~{ ~•g g~ +yg ~ Q QI ~ l~
PP p P
~ '
~b~ ~~~r~ ~roo•• ~ ~ 2~~ ° " ~
~o'►<~ 44 ~ N~ ° tlr1 ~ nrp r
aa Q
fa o Q ~
-6
~ &0 a ma0 N
1
sY ~ ~ ol pa
~
.y,A
a o. ~
e~~~ e ^
a$~~
x $ ~
~ ~e re
~ 1 o~9 °
~ 0 0 0
J s
~ + w ~w
o,fto ~ R
~ 1!3 a 8$8~'a a~
000000~ n
i? 4
.~os
J R 80NNETT ENGINEERING
9306 North Newport Htghway S"EET N° S oF
SPOKANE, WA 99218 cALcuLATED Bv oArE G/~ G
TEL, (509) 468 7626
FAX. (509) 468 7534 CHECKED 8Y QATE
scnLE
- ~ f
f.Ao o F ~
zr ~rc~ ~
y - ,3
LG
&L o r
~
Q~? - ¢Z
~
rr~ (
53
~
~ Nr~cE,Pr = ( S3 si5 aS = . 50 C~s Qq - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ts,•~J
Qc a, = . ~s - So - ~S c~'s
WIDf .Zn1~~T"l - c ? Y.SA <~5~ ~ /p 'r rS 1 4!r C-tS CyC
~ o ~!iJ /DE- Cvl~3 .~i✓~L~~ Ah7Z` ll~6~3 ~~D 1
143S 7' 6J77/1.f Q p-s l.J ~Crow G N I0
Coj.IVI`y 7-0 6i1D dF 6vR4 ~ Z)/4fGTG'/ /n/Tr) IOeAJO
~
~f',Ct161 fipT I A(Ath? .r Mxs B111 T Jioe+ R~ 1 k f S h'
J.R. Bo~vvETTENGiN~.~irNG
CML & STRUC7URAL "1'sNGINEBRING/CONSUL?'ING
9306 !Y NIsWAORTIlIGFIfVAY
SPUKAN6 WA 49218
(509) 468 7626
0
STREET CROSS GRADE CALCULATIOAIS
Of
~
1VIAMEI4 ROi4D 1MPROVEMEIV TS
" Inland Commetce Park
Spolcane WA
ffor
QFflCIAI PUBLIC OOCUrAENT
&POKANE COUWTY ENGfNEM S OFFICE
ol I ~A~. w
~CT I
Suawn .
4~~:1 ~'4 . .t ~
M A &61 oF ~i'~°
/NLAND CONSTRUC770N
SPOKANE WASHINGTON
90693
~F C1STE~
as~oNAL
June 1996
~~i
JRBE Job No 96124 mom 10-3 -
1
MAMER ROAD • Street Cross Grade Calculations
DISTANCE ASPHALT ASPHALT
CENTERLINEICENTERLINEI EOER ITO EDGE OF I CROSS I FLOWLINE I DISTANCE TO I CR03S 0
STATION I ELEVATION JELE1/ATIONI PAVING 1 SLOPE (ELEVATIONI FLOWLINE I SLOPE 1 TOC ELEV
ft tt ft °Yo ft ft °h ft
0+6135 198262 198302 1308 -3 06 198302 0 04 N/A N/A
0+90 ( 196358 ~ 198409 ~ 1273 ~-4 01 ~ 188418 ~ 2 50 ~ N/A ~ N/A
1+2168 198492 ~ 198461 ~ 1060 ~ 104 ~ 198467 700 ~ 2 00 ~ N/A
1+35 79 198563 ~ 198555 ~ 11 10 ~ 0 72 ~ 198528 8 90 ~ 3 03 f 196578
1+52 72 ~ 198651 ~ 198644 ~ 1170 ~ 0 60 ~ 198619 ~ 8 30 3 01 1 198669
1+68 02 ~ 198123 ~ 198103 ~ 1180 ~ 169 ~ 198678 ~ 8 20 3 05 ~ 198728
2+0019 ~ 198855 ~ 198827 ~ 1210 1 2 31 198803 ~ 7 90 ~ 3 04 ~ 198853
2+19 31 ~ 198920 ~ 198902 11 10 ~ 162 1988 75 ~ 890 ~ 3 03 ( 198925
2+3112 ~ 198980 ~ 198940 1110 ~ 3 60 ~ 196913 ~ 8 90 ~ 3 03 ~ 198963
3+0112 ~ 199187 ~ 199137 ~ 1110 ~ 4 50 ~ 199110 ~ 8 90 ~ 3 03 ~ 199180
3+28 31 ~ 199301 ~ 199258 ~ 1230 ~ 3 50 ~ 199235 ~ 7 70 1 2 99 J 199285
3+89 85 ~ 1996 90~ 199617 ~ 1230 ~ 5 93 ~ 199694 ~ 7 70 ~ 2 99 ~ 199644
4+2109 ~ 199980 ~ 199914 ~ 1230 ~ 5 37 199891 ~ 7 70 ~ 299 ~ 199941
4+59 47 ~ 200404 ~ 200365 ~ 1270 ~ 3 07 200343 ~ 7 30 ~ 3 01 ~ 200393
4+95 09 ~ 2408 63 ( 200840 ~ 1230 ~ 187 ~ 200817 ~ 7 70 I 299 ~ 200867
5+48 21 ~ 201643 ~ 201609 ~ 12 80 ~ 2 66 ~ 201587 ~ 7 20 ~ 3 06 ~ 201637
5+97 69 ~ 202392 ~ 202342 ~ 1320 ~ 3 79 J 202322 ~ 6 80 ~ 2 94 C 202372
6+26 23 ~ 202805 ~ 202755 ~ 1390 ~ 3 60 ~ 202737 ~ 610 ~ 2 95 ~ 202787
~
8+87 94 203636 ~ 203581 ~ 9 90 ~ 5 58 ~ 203671 ~ 2.22 ( 4 50 ~ N/A 7 27 84 ~ 104150 ~ 204118 1 1073 ~ 2 89 ~ 204119 I 0 00 ~ N/A ~ N/A 0
~
N
Page 1
TRAFFIC MIPACT ANALYSIS
for
INLAND CONSTRUCTION BUSIIiTESS PARK
Spokane County, Wash.uigton
August,1997
Sponsor Inland Coustruction Company North 1618 Mamer Road Spokaae WA 99216
Prepared by
Inland Pacific Engrneering Company
707 W 7th Avenue, Surte 200
Spokane, WA 99204
(509)458-6840
Tlus report has been prepared by the staffof Inland Pacific Enguieenng Company under the directaon
of the undersigned professional engineer whose seal and signature appears hereon
~ S~ti
~ ,y'M~, ~?r
G
22916 ~~`,~C►~ C~,IST
~ t7 fr.~dT~\
~ . •~°C~
EXPIRES 9/ii Jqq ~
Timothy A Schwab, P E
2PABLEL-QF CO + '
I1V7ROD UCT70N 1
?7A - DOCUMENT SCOPE 1
PROJEG°l DESCRIP770N 2
EXECU'TNE SUMMARY 5
C0NCLUSIONS 5
RECOMMF.NDA770NS 6
EXISTING CONDITIONS 7
EXIS?7NG CONDIT70NS 7
Land Use 7
Exisnng Roaatways 7
Interstate (SR) 90 7
Pines Road (SR 27) 9
Misscon Avenue 9
Indcana Avenue/Montgomery 9
McDonald Road 9
Mamer Road 9
Nora Avenue 10
Evergreen Road 10
Project Study Area I►uersecnons cmd Traffic Control 10
Traffic Volumes and Peak Hours of Operatton 10
LEVEL OF SERVICE 11
ScgrralcZed Intersecttons 11
Unsignahzed Intersectsons 11
Exisnng Level of Service and Tra,,B`ic Arralysis 12
Traffic Safety 15
Planned Transportmon Improvements 15
Background Projects 16
Tnp Generanon and Drstrabunon 19
FUT ZIRE Y,EAR T RAFFIC 11igPACT ANALYSIS 25
ANALYSIS, ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODOLOGIES 25
BULED OUT LEVEL OF SERVICE 25
CONCLUSIONS 34
RLCOMMENDATIONS 35
TABLE QF CQ.NTE.IYTS. conanued
LLST OF FIWRES
Figure 1- Vicanity 1VIap 3
Figure 2- Srte Map 4
Figure 3- Existrng Zontng Map 8
Figure 4- Ezrsting PM Peak Hour Traffic Vol.umes 14
Figure S- PM Peak Hour Background Projects TraffiC Volunies 18
Figure 6- P111 Peak Hour Site Generoted Yolumes Without Evergreen I/C 22
Fcgure 7- PM Peak Hour Site Generated Volumes With Evergreen I/C, Left Turn
at Mamer/Mrssion Intersecnon Adlowed 23
Figure 8- PM Peak Hour Site Generated Volumes With Evergreen I/C, Left Turn
at Mamer/Mission Intersecuon Not Allowed 24
Figure 9-1997 PM Peak Hour Traf, fic Volumes Wrthout Project 27
Figrcre 10 -1997 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Project, Wtthout Evergreen
I/C 31
Fcgure 11 - 1997 PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Project, With Evergreen
1/C, Left Turn at Mamer/Misscon IRtersecuon Allowed 32
Figure 12 - 1997 PM Peak Hour Trafflc Volumes With Project, With Evergreen
1/C, Left Turn at Mamer/Mission Iruersecnon Not Allowed 33
U$'T QY TABJM
Table 1- Exastcng Levels of Service 13
Table 2- Acccdenr data for selected antersecnons wcthrn the study area 15
Table 3- Trcp Gerceratcon Rates for Background Projects - PM Peak Hour 17
Table 4- Trcp Generanon Rates for Busrness Park - PM Peak Hour 19
Table S- Burld Out Year Tra,~"ic Witltoui IRland Constructcon Busrness Park 26
Tcable 6- Build Out Year Tnaffic With Iraland Construction Business Park, Without
Evergreen I/C 28
Table 7- Butld Out Year Traff c With Inland Constructtoh Bustness Park With
Evergreen IIC Left Turn at Mamer/Mrssron Allowed 29
Table 8-Burld Out Year Tra, ffic With Inland Con.struction Bu.srness Park, With
Evergreen I/C, Left 73ctrrt at Mamer/Missron Not Allowed 30
fiECH1VICAL APPENDIX
Level of Servrce - Methods, Cntena and Tables
Calculations for F.acrstcng Level of Setvice
Calculatcons for Bulld Out Levels of Servrce Wcthout Project, Without Improvemenrs
Calculattons for Build Out Levels of Servtce Without Project With Irnprovements
Calculatrores for Buald Out Levels of Servrce With Project, Wathout Improvemenrs, V~ithout
Evergreen
Calculutcons for Burld Out Levels af Service With Project With Improvements, Without Evergreen
Cakulamons for Build Out Levels of Sernce With Project, Without Improvemenis, With Evergreen,
, Left nrn at Mamer Allowed
Calculmorts for Bruld Out Levels of Service With Project, With Improvements, With Evergreen,
Left Tunt at Marrter Allowed
Calculutions forBuild OraLevels of Sentice With P%ject, Without Improvements, Wath Evergreen,
Left Turn ct Mamer Not Allowed
~ Calculataons for Butld Out Levels of Service With Profect, With Improvements, With Evergreen,
Left Turn at 1Vlamer Not Allowed
~
I
~
INT'RODIICTI4N
TIA - DOCUMENT SCOPE
This Traffic Impact Analysis is being provided to Spokane County aad the VVashuigton State
Departnieat of Transportation (WSDOT) to document the analysis and findmgs of a tiraffic impact
assessment conducted for the proposed development of Phase 2 of the Inland Constxucrion
Busmess Park, praposed office buddmgs and warehouse space in Spokane County east of the Clty
of Spokane This property lies north of Misslon Avenue and east of Mamer Road as shown on
Figure 1, the Vicunty Map The proposed project will develop approximately 5 acres of flat to
sloping land The existing zonuig for this site is a combuiation of UR-22 and I 2 zoniqg In the
spnng of 1996 conditions for development of Phase 1 of the buslness park were set by the County
Phase 2 of the proposed project exceeds those conditions Therefore this study is for a part of
the change of conditions due to further development of the property The present proposal is for
40,588 S F of addiaoaal office space and 27,059 S F of additional warehouse space which can
be accommodated, although there are several limiting factors, includmg a BPA easement which
luYUt development of thls site
The purpose of tlus analysis is to review, assess and idend.fy potential traffic related unpacts which
tlus development may have on the transportanon system and where possible mmmmze these
unpacts Tlus TIA will be completed in accordance wrth the current traffic guidelines available
from Spokane County, WSDOT and the Institute of Traffic Engineers (A Recommended Practace -
Traffic Access and Impact Studtes for Srte Develapment, 1991)
The project study area for this Traffic Iinpact Analysis was detenmined through conversahons with
Spokane County and WSDOT to include the following wtersections
• Mamer Road & Mission Avenue
• McDonald Road & Niission Avenue
• Pmes Road (SR 27) & Mission Avenue
• Pmes Road & Nora Road
• Pines Road & the Eastbound I 9U ramp termuials
• Pmes Road & the Westbound I-90 ramp temunals
a Pmes Road & Indhana/Montgomery
Specific traffic impact related issues to be addressed within this report wdl uiclude
• Existuag traffic conditions within the project study area
• Tnp generation characterLstics related to the proposed development for the existwg
and future transportation system
Inland Paccfzc Engineercng, Inc 1 In14nd Construction Business Park TIA
• The anticipated tnp disinbuuon expected for the new trrps from the site at full
build out
• The effects of the trip generahon and distribution to the existmg and futur+e
transportation system
• Traffic unpacts witlun the project study area due either to traffic growth or other
background projects wtuch are separate from the addiaon of the Phase 2 Inland
Construcaon Busmess Fuk
• Separaiely identify the traffic unpacts which are due to the addhtional traffic from
the Phase 2 Inland Construction Business Park
0 Analysis, conclusions and recommended nutigauon for the effects of the trips
generat,ed by the Phase 2 Inland Construcnon Busmess Park on the transportation
system
PROJECT DESCRIP770N
Ttus property is locaLed m eastern Spokane County, Washington, approxunately 10 miles east of
the City of Spokane central busmess district The parcel hes east of Mamer Road, south of I-90,
and north of Mission Avenue between Pines Road and Sullivan Road The exLstmg parcel ts
somewhat sloping from south to north Homes have previously occupied the site, but are in the
process of bemg removed due to construcuon of Phase 1 of this project This rezone will allow
Phase 2 of the Inland Construction Busuiess Park to develop additional office and warehouse
space Prunary wgress and egress for this business park will be to Mamer Road directly vm one
driveway locagon
The property is bordered by I-90 to the north, some vacant land to the east, Mamer Road to the
west and has some steep land on-vacant property to the south The use of land adjacent to I-90
is a mix of residential and commercial uses The predommant land use m the area to the south of
the site is single family dwelluig unrts with lots of varying sizes Along Mission Avenue, an
assortment af land uses is evldent, including a day care facihty, some duplexes and siqgle family
residences, Valley General Hospital and various medical buddings
Exishng zoning of tlus parcel is UA-22 and I-2 The proposed project uses are allowed under
these zoning categones Therefore, tins TIA is beung prepared for a change of condinon
application for the property Tlus pazcel is surrounded by UR-3 5 zonung except I 2 and B-2
zorung north of tlus parcel and the freeway
A preliminary site plan of tlns development is shown in Figure 2
Inland Pacific Engcrieertng, Inc 2 Inland Constructcotr Business Park TIA
p FA
M RAC;
J ~ ` • w `
d I
u z t
~ 3 Z L
a ~
c
e
s PROJECT ~
JIAV%'- ~a
LOCATION INDIANA
SHANNON AVE
; 2 • •
INDIANA AVE`'` ~ ~ 9GF
~
NORA AVE
~Y
~
0
Y
-
p H 3 MRXWELL
IteileY o QIV
SINTO SINTO SINTO
Medicai --o
Center 3.SHARP oj ol SMAAP z~ AVE AVF
800NE °C w a a
' BOONE a°c a 0 ' _BOONE ~m W z j wi Q
~ OESMET r` ° °C ? oci ~ ~ o
DESMET ~ ~DESMET Q Q Q ;
CATAL00 i Q Cqrq P
L00 W 'z ~~~Y ~ a O ~ CATAL00 AVE ~ ~~g1
~l MA..LON EBlak IemA ~~1 a m ~ALLON MALLOtJ 'I Mpt ON,~~~ ~ o
o~
CT BROADWAY t ~ AVE m ~ O° o a A
SPRIGfIEIPw
1eS ~ N%# z SPRINaFIELO AVE Q I W SPRINGFIElO AVE
Z= w ~ ~ w aLxi AVE cT M r Pro~ress 0 3 > ~ ~ ALKI w~ ~ ZIKI ouvE E em ¢ ~
OLIVE~ o OLIVE H~ ~ Z~ u'~'i W- p t 4 ~ O
o p > < m ¢ VAILEY Q O ~ Oc
VALLEY WAY 3 J w W` WAY ~
z 3 Z *4 ' NIXOH -wc d W ~ NIXON ^ Z
„ 4 Q p_NIXON ~ Q z w z" NIXON ~ Z
~ o o MAIN4AVE MAIN ao m m cD W >
a)5a Z ci MAIN W
~ p~,Q►SIDE ('3 J
~~~i Y SIDE 3: z Z'r a RIVEASIDE MAIN
RIVERSIDE ~ v
~ I ~ w z RIVERSIOE
~ ~ ~ m
¢ mI SPRAGUE
v ' ' ' rG
IsT uw'; zNO_ ~
C3 ~j_ 2N
_ D ~ z
3RD 3R0 AVE z
~ Cr_ 3RD AVE Q J
~ 4?N AVE W` m 3R0 CT ~
N J
W @ ~ ¢ z
o a,~ y~ W~ ~ Keystone 5TH AVE STH > ~ STH
t ~ d Eiem STH - , a
6~„ ¢ _QyH ~ ~ 6TH AVE m ^ CT 6TH m 36TH
~ 0 W Z a 7TH AVE ~ Q a W J y 7TH
>
z ~ V Q
~
a =l > > 0 W 8TH AVF °C ° Z ~
NOT TO SCALE
I NLAND FlGURE 1 ~ r INLAND CONSTRUCTION \
PACIFIC BUSINESS PARK
ENC3INEERiNQ VI CI N I TY M AP
707 West 7cf► suite 200 (sas) ass-saao TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSiS
`Spakane WA 99204 FAx (gos) 458-8844of ~ JN% PROJECT NO 96215 J
~
.
0000 '
ow
000 +
a
~
► ~ -
rr0-0000
" . .
-
i r$yN~~~ p~~:~~ ~
ti_ ~ •
~ ~ - ,.•S ~ .~3 z ~ ~
,WFVx
p1~t! y... ~ A X4~~,~,~•
j ~
. "
~ ~ 1 • ;3,y
~ ~ ~ 1 drng ~
~ ` ~ ~ °
~B► ~ g~dtr+9 ~ ~ ~ ~
~
,
~ ~
aft ~
+
wo N• ~
~~.Owo
7 ~
~
000
so
0000 J
■ ' 000+'
..ol' 40 ow
1N~aK~ CaNS ARK
5C~'~ ~ ~ 6u5tNES' P
S0T To POPOW- fr1~uR~ N P►~
.~,RAF~c 1M ND T 621 ~
~
P1-~N pROJEC .
40-001 IN~ ~Ftc
PAC ~EEAING -
1'~....
ENaI~~~ 458 ~ 8 ,~ga~ 1th 5! Ae 200 FAX l`'~~ ~
EXECIITIVE SUN,[MARY
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the analysis, field observations, assumptions, methodologies and results wluch are
provided in the bady of tlus document, it Ls concluded that the unpacts to the overall area
transportation system from developmg ttus property are minimal Tlus conclusion was reached
and is documented wrthin the body of this report A brief descnption of the conclusions and
recommendations wluch uiclude project unpacts are iacluded here
• The unsignalzed intersecnons wrttun the project area are presently functionuig at
level of service C or better wrth the exception of Nitssion Avenue 8c McDonald
Road Duruig the PM peak hour, dus intersecaon is presently funcuoiung at level
of service F The signalized intersections withm the study area are currently
fimtionuig at level of service D or better
• The increase in traffic wittun the next year tivithout the addhtion of the Phase 2
Inland Construcuon Business Park trips will lower the level of service at the
followmg wtersecuons, Pmes and the easibound I-90 ramp terminal intersecaon
(LOS D to LOS F), Pmes and the westbound I-90 ramp termmmal mtersection (LOS
D to LOS E) and the Pmes and Mission Avenue intersecUon (LOS D to LOS E)
With WSDOT scheduled unprovements, the LOS for the above intersections on
Pmes Road wdl unprove to LOS D The level of service at Mission and McDonald
dunng the PM peak hour wffl remain at LOS F without signal mstallauon
~ Without the scheduled unprovements on Pmes Road, the add.rtion of tlle proposed
Phase 2 Inland Construction Business Park project would cause the level of service
at the intersecuon of Pmes & westbound I-90 ramp terminals to drop from LOS D
to LOS E in all of the Evergreen Interchaage scenarios Also without the
scheduled unprovements on Pmes Road the addiuon of the proposed project trips
will cause the level of service at the intersection of Pmes & eastbound I-90 ramp
ternunals to drop from LOS E to LOS F for all scenarios of the Evergreen
Interchange However, with the scheduled safety and capacity unprovements on
Pmes by WSDOT, there will be no change m the level of service with the addition
of the Phase 2 Inland Construction Busmess Park project Levels of service will
be LO►S D or better wrth or without the proposed project for the budd out year
• There Ls no measurable benefit to the traffic this project will generate by having the
Evergreen Interchange constructei Comparing the delay ames in Tables 6, 7, and
8 for the dtfferent scenarios with and without the Evergreen Interchange there is
no appreciable improvement in the delay tunes with the Evergreen Interchange over
Inlarid Paci, fic Engtneercng, Inc 5 Inland Construction Bustness Park T7A
without the Evergreen Interchange
RECOMMENDATIONS
, Based upon the analysts presented, the proposal development of the Phase 2 Inland Construcuon
Business Park wi11 have no sigiuficant unpact on the transportation system Rnthin the general
geograpluc area In order to unplement this project and provide the safest possible ingress and
egress available, not only to tlus proposed development, but also to surraundmg propemes and
existing commuter traff'ic, the followmg recommendations should be mcorporatied mto the project
• Frontage umprovements as requffed by the County
• Future paracipaaon vn the McDonald/Mission intersecuon signal improvements
based on addihonal PM peak hour trips added to the uiiersection from the project
~
i
~
, Inlarrd Pacific Engineerrng, Inc 6 Inland Construction Buslness Park TIA
EXISTING CUNDITIONS
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Land Use
At the preseni time the land is undeveloped and zoned I-2 and UR-22 The area adjacent to the
proposed development is zoned UR 3 5 except across the freeway to the north, the property is
zoneci I 2 aad B-2 Figure 3 shows the existmg zoniung for tlus area Phase 1 of ttus project is in
the process of constructing three buildings with approxmately 12,080 S F of office space and
15,920 S F of warehouse space
The proposed Phase 2 project will develop approxmately S acres wto 40,588 S F of office space
and 27,059 S F of warehouse space The land to ths east of this parcel is vacant except for a
water tower and pump station A mix of commercial and nual-type residential land uses exist
on the property to the west of the site fronting Nora Avenue North of the site is I-90 and south
of the srte is a steep hiliside up to Mission Avenue
Exishng Roadways
At the present ume the existuig roadways w the unmed.iate area are paved and in various stages
of complete build out For example, Mission Avenue is a mmor artenal wluch nuns from Sullivan
Road to the east, and contmues past Argonae Road to the west In the vicuuty of the Valley
Haspital, to the west of ttus site, it has a four-lane cross-section, two lanes in each direction The
apartment complexes m the azea of McDonald Road have been reqwred to widen Mission Avenue
to continue tius cross-secaon further e.ast Another artenal in the area which has aot been bwlt
to it's ultimate cross-section is Evergreen Road Although Evergreen Road is shown on the
County's Artenal Road Plan as a principal arterial, for the majonty of it's length it is a two lane,
two-way smp paved road with gravel or grassy shoulders
Interstate (SR) 90 is an east/west twaway, four lane, median separated luruted access mterstate
freeway on the County, Washmgton State Deparrment of Transportation and the Federal Highway
Administrauon transportation systems This uiterstate facility is a principal arterial highway on
the WSDOT highway plan Access for dus facility is considered full, or controlled, and is only
allowed at controlled access points such as naterchanges As is typical with interstate freeways,
all cross traffic is grade separated and the signed speed lunit within this area is 60 mph This
facdity is responsibte for carrying many of the inter-area commute tnps, such as between the
valley and downtown Spokane This facility also cames the mEtjority of the inter-state freight and
Inlarr.d Pacrfic Engineerang, Inc 7 Inland Construchon Bustness Park 77A
I , co
N
URm22
lvlR robo
1 ~
P°rM
" h
~ N
4N IEtD RRrI o RRVIO N
T PROJECT
96 ' r,,,,,o LOCATtON
_
N
1- 2
~ ~ UR~Z ~
~ F
~ t ~ o a
~-3 $ 14 ~ M 5 l O N ~ V E.
8-
_ IS
~7 - - ~ - , -
~ M
~o~
2 o N a UR-22 UR-12
..a g r i~ T , UR- 2 2 See Inse r t De tai l
1- 22 ua•ZZ 0= o _ •
- UR-35 ~ ol UR_12 ~w o
Y a ,y.owi
~ 1 ,y~
< N Y u
O~ /IpI 1 ~ Q 1~0~ ~
~ Y.~ ~ ~ ' • ~ _ _ 1 a U ~
4~P4~42 dR-7
. - ~
cc - ~..T~►
H
►
0
co
A~ i i~ ~
AY
~ t•* . • ~
' I • _4
ar ~7C
hoo C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y p~ ! / ~ l r
!
, fQ^~ s
~R 'V~~ ~ v
Z - ~ ~
.f
C. A. i.0 rs j y e
v wA Y
NOT TO SCALE
~ J
`
FIGURE 3 INLAND CONSTRUC110N ~
I NLAND
PaCIFIC BUSINESS PARK
ENGINEERING ZONING MAP TRpFFlC IMPACT ANALYStS
707 vvest 7cn suite 200 (509) 45a-6e40 PROJECT NO 96215 ~
Spokane WA 9920~5 FAX. (509) 458-6844! `
\
commercial veincles with destmataons e&,-t and west of Spokane and a large portlon of the
interstate personal velucle tnps such as fo- moviag or vacationuig
Pznes Road (SR 27) wtthin the project area is a five-lane principal arterial on both Spokane
County's and the Washington State Deparment of Transportation arterml systems As a north-
south principal artenal, dus facility is responsible for uitra and inter-urban uea tnps The uiter-
area trips are prunanly those tnps between commurutles lymg north and south of the greater
Spokane area, or a commuting route for thoe individuals hvuig m the less urban areas of Spokane
County The intra area tnps are those unmedtate area trips, and the facihtatton of these through
tnps to the Sprague Avenue, Interstate 90 and Trent Avenue corridors Pmes Road within the
urban area boundanes allows for the movement between artenals, such as Sprague, or collectors,
such as Fourth Avenue and to access the I-90 corridor for commutmg as well as commercial
purposes The general cross-section of thLt iacihty in the srte vicuuty is five lanes, with two-way
left turns and de&cated left turn lanes at the intersechons Between the uitersections of Mission
Avenue and Indiana Avenue, the posted Teed lunit Ls 35 miles per hour (mph)
Mcssron Avenue is a aunor east-west artene. accorduig to the Spokane County Artenal Road Ptan
It's ultunate cross secuon is a four-lane se,.tion, two lanes in each duection Turn lanes will be
added as ne,eded at critical intersections su,.h as the nght tura lane for westbound traffic at Pmes
Road For most of it's length, Mission A` %enue is a two-1ane, east-west artenal However from
approxrnmtely one block west of Pmes Rcsd to east of McDonald Road (east of Pmes), Mission
Avenue has been developed to the four-lane ultimate cross secaon The speed lumt along it's
length is 35 mph
In&ana Avenue/Montgomery is a nunor east-west artenal accorduig to the Spokane County
Artenal Road Pian between Argonne Roac 3nd Pmes Road Ctiurently it is a twaway, two lane
road Sowever, ttus arterial will be ex-tended from Pmes Road to Sullivan Road with the
construction of the new mall ui t}vs area a five-lane section will be constructed in tlus area wrth
curbs and sidewalks
McDonald Road is a mmor artenal accord.3g to the Spokane County Artenal Road Plan It is a
two-way arcerial rurming between Saltese Road to the south and Mssion Aveaue to the north
Within the last f ve years, the section beta ten Sprague Avenue and Mission Avenue was upgraded
to a four lane paved faciltty with curbs an` sidewalk to carry the north-south traffic through and
within the emmediate area Sou[h of appr ~runately Second Avenue, it is a two lane facilrty It
serves prunarfly as access to and from the mrrounding residential azeas The speed lunrt along
it's length is 35 mph
Mamer Road is a loeal access road accordz-- a to the County Arterial Road Plan It is a two-lane,
two-way roadway running north-south ben; een Broadway Avenue to the south and Nora Avenue
to the nonh North of Mission Avenue ale~-~ the site frontage, the road has a steep grades, up to
13%
Inland Paccfic Engineering Inc 9 Inland Constructcon Buscness Park TIA
Nora Avenue is a local access road along the south side of I-90 east of Pmes Road to Mamer
Road if is a twalane, two-way roadway ru,nning east-west At the Pmes Road intersectton, the
southbound traffic is prolubited from turning mto Nora Avenue and westbound traffic on Nora
Avenue is prohibited from turnung southbound onta Pmes Road
Evergreen Road is a pruicipal artenal accordmg to the County Artenal Itoad Plan It Ls a two-
lane, two-way arterial runnuig betweea 32nd Avenue to the south and Mission Avenue to the
north The speed hnrut is posted at 35 At both Sprague Avenue and Broadway, Evergreen widens
out At Broadway, the cxoss-secrion changes to accomunodate two lanes in each duection At
Sprague Avenue, the widening accommodates a dedicated left turn lane for both north and south
bound traffic South of tlus left turn lane is a short sechon of two-way left turn lane to
accommodate the new Target store and the Safeway store followed by a conUnuation of the two
lane, two-way section it has along most of it's length
Project Study Area Intersections and Tr~f "tc Control
Project study area uitersections in the site vicuuty were idenUfied through discussions with Pat
Harper at Spokane County Enguieer's Department and Greg Figg at WSDOT The intersecuons
were
• Mamer Road & Mission Avenue
• McDonald Road & Mission Avenue
• Pmes Road (SR 27) & Mission Avenue
• Pmes Road & Nora Avenue
• Pmes Road & the Eastbound I-90 ramp termunals
• Pmes Road & the Westbound I-90 ramp ternunals
• Pmes Road & Indiana/Montgomery
These intersections have been a.nalyzed for level of service (LOS) and form the basis of ttus
document This study was also scoped to look at the effects the Evergreen Interchange would
have
The Pmes Road intersecUons are presently traffic signal controlled intersectaons with the exception
of Nora Avenue The Mtssion & McDonald intersection and Mission 8c Mamer mtersecUons are
stop sign controlled with the north/south street yielduig to Mission Avenue
Tra, f,~c Volumes and Peak Hours of Openation
Existing turmng traffic movement volumes at the identified uitersections were determined from
actual traffic counts taken by the staff of Inland Pacif'ic Engineering (IPE) during the sprmg of
1995 and fall of 1996, and by WSDOT and Spokane County during 1996 for PM peak hours of
Inland Pactfcc Enganeenng, Inc 10 Inland Construction Busrness Park TIA
operation
Suice the weekday PM peak hours have been identified as the time penod when the great,est traffic
demands are placed on the surrouading mnsportatioa system, ttus will be the hme penod unlued
by thLS study for analyzuig the proposed action
LEYEL OF SERYICE
Level of service (LOS) is a qualifiable prernise developed by the traasportation profession to
quantYfy dnver perception for such elements as travel tune, number of stops, total amount of stopped
delay, and unpe,diments caused by other vehicles afforded to dnvers who utilize the transportauon
network. It has been defined by the Transportation Research Board m Special Report No 209 the
1994 Highway Capacrly Mariual Tius document has quantified level of service into a range from
"A" which uldicates httle, if any, velucle delay, to "F" which indicates significant 'vehicle delm and
traffic congeshon which may Iead to system breakdown due to volumes wluch may far ezceed
capacrty
Sigaalized Intersechoie.s
For %gnalized intexsechons, recent research has determined that average stopped delay per -t elucle
is the best available measure of level of service The technical appendix of this report, includes a
section on the Level of Service, Methods and Cntena The tables in the techrucal appendix identify
the relattonslups between level of service and average stopped delay per velucle Usmg tbas
defuution as presented in the Highway Capacity Manual, level of service D is generally considered
to represent the minunum acceptable design standard for signalized intersections in an urban area
such as this
Unsignalized Interseciwns
' The calculation of level of service (LOS) at an unsignalmd oaeltwaway stop-controlled mtersection
Ls examined m the Transportarion Research Board's 1994 Special Report 209, The Hrghway Capacrty
Manual For unsignalized mtersecuons, level of service is based on the delav expenenced b% each
movement wrthin the mtersection
The concept of delay as presented for unsignauzed intersecuons w the Highway Capacity Alanual
is based on the emount of time a velucle must spend in the tntersection Velucles passing stmght
through the mtersection on the major (uncontrolled) street expenence no delay at the mtersection
On the other hand, velucles which are tunung left from the minor street, because thev must yYeld the
nght of way to a11 nght tunv.ng velucles, all left turning vehicle from the major street and all through
velucles on both the minor and major streets, must spend more tlme at the mtersection Lex els of
service are assigned to individual movements wnthin the intersection, and are based upon the delay
Inland Pacific Engineerzng, Inc 11 Inland Consmicnon Business Park TIA
expenenced by each movement or approach
The Transportation Research Board has deternained what levels of service for unsignalized
mtersections should be, by designatxng level of sernce A through F, where level of service A
represents a facility where no velucle m any movement is delayed very long and level of service F
which represents a facihty where there is excessive delay for the average velucle in at least one
movement in the lntersecton Level of sernce E has been defined as the muumum acceptable level
of service for tlus area
All level of service analyses descnbed in tius report were performed in accordance with the
procedures descnbed above As a final note, the Highway Cagacrty Manual (HC1V) analysis and
procedures are based upon worst case conditions Therefore, tnost of each weekday and the
weekends will expenence ftff'ic condiUons better thaa those descnbed vvithin this document~ which
are only for the peak hours of operatlon
Exi.shng Level of Service and Traffic Analysas
As outlined above, the LOS techiuques used for this study wdl follow those oudined ui the 1994
Highway Capactty Manual, TRB Specral Report 209 The scope of tlus study will uiclude those
intersecUons wittun the project study azea, aamely the intersecuons of Mamer Road & Mission
Avenue, McDonald Road & 1Vlission Avenue, Pmes Road (SR 27) & Mission Avenue, Pines Road
& Nora Avenue, Pines Road & the eastbound I-90 ramp termuLals, Pines Road & the westbound
I-90 ramp terminals and Puies Road & Indiana/Montgomery These mtersechons were chosen by
Spokane County or WSDOT as intersecuons which could experience impacts from the Inland
Construction Business Park
As detemtined dunug scopvng of this TIA, the greatest impacts to the transportation system for
this type of development, will occur dtuuig the PM peak hours as the work to home-base (PM)
commuters are on the transportation system Based upon requuements of Spokane County and
WSDOT for tlus analysis, the lowest acceptable level of service for an unsignalized mtersections
will be an LOS of E For a signalzed intersecUon, LOS D will be the minimum acceptable level
of service On occasion, an existmg intersection which has not been analyzed in some tune will,
when exanuned in a report of thts nature, appear with an existing unacceptable level of service
This may happen for an unsignalized intersection if the level of service is found to be at F or if
a signalized intersection is working at level of service E or F Intersections with levels of service
wluch are currenily ttus low, or wluch are brought into unacceptable levels of service durmg the
build out of the project may be candidates for nutigation to provide acceptable levels of service
Table 1, wluch follows, surnmarizes ihe current levels of service for the existing PM peak hour
at each identifiel mtersection These LOS results are from the traffiG counts performed by IPE,
Spokane County and WSDOT for this study HCS data used to generate all levels of service
Inland Paci, fic Engineenng, Inc 12 Inland Construction Buscness Park TIA
shown in this document are ui the Techiucal Appendix Figure 4 shows the existing mtersection
volumes counted by IPE staff, Spokane County and WSDOT wtuch were used for Table 1
Tuble 1- Eaasting Levels of Sernce
EXIS'`ING P~vI'~A~"FIC
I~+l"`EItS~C'~i~I~
DELAY LOS
. ,
Pines Rd /Indiana Ave 12 4 sec B
Pines Rd /WB Ramps 25 5 sec D
Pines Rd IEB Ramps 39 6 sec D
, Pines Rd /Nora Road 6 9 sec B
Pmes Rd /Mission Ave 28 5 sec D
Niission Ave /McDonald Road 83 4 sec F
, Mssion Ave /Mamer Road 9 3 sec B
Mission Ave /Evergreen Road 114 sec C
Denotes unsignalized mtersection
For unsignalized uftrsecbons, delay and level of service shown indicates the worst movement
through the mtersection
As can be seen from the above table, the eJUStmg levels of service at most of the intersections
withui the project study area are wittun the acceptable range for either signalized or unsignalized
intersections witlvn Spokane County The exception is the uitersection of Mission & McDonald
All other intersections are operating at levels of service D or better
During the PM peak hour, the mtersection of Mission & McDonald is presently functioiung at
level of semce F with an average of 83 4 seconds of delay for eacb northbound left tuming
vehicle Overall mtersection delay is 16 9 second.s At the present tune, the mtersection could
funcuon at acceptable levels of service by chaqgmg the control to either an all-way stvp or by
uistallug a traffic signal Although an all-way stop would provide acceptable levels of service
with existmg traffic volumes, with the traffic growth anticipated in the aear future, the all-way
stop would not provide adequate level of service for even the anticipated bwldout growth
exanuned in this study A signal warrant analysis was performed for this mtersection in previous
traffic studies Presently, this mtersection meeLs five warrants, includuig Warraat 2, Interruption
of Contuiuous Traffic A complete copy of the warrant analysis is included in the Techrucal
Appendux of the Traffic Impact Analysis for the Ridgeview Estates Apartment Community
Inland Pacrfcc Engcneering, Inc 13 Inland Construction Buscness Park T7A
/ 0) \
~bb
5o.P t~k,,12
14 -4> 4:31- 44,
307 ~ /r+ 81
INDIANA/MONTGOM Y ~
~ N ~
NOT TO SCALE
~ zo
242
O N
~ ° W BOUND RAMPS
~ CO
< Mb
o
~ 243 ~ 90
(n 940 ~
Z
- 4~
0' ~ F
E 60UND RAMPS M N
15 NORA AVENUE '
o ~ '
<
4 ~ 0
'o
L1J
~
r~ N a Q
V
41P 11-01
131 ~ %415 4/' Q 12
129 ~ -0=-170 394 305 378 -c> G;d 331 242 217
38 cz,-,/~ 99 188 79 Q 4~ ~ 2 127 ~ ~ 39
Q a
N{~ a ao n 0 a~ ~r c~
o► ~ ~ ~
MISSION AVENUE nJ w.
Q w
o ~
o ~
w/
. ~
I NLAND FIGURE 4 iNIAND CONSTRUCTION ~
PACIFIC E XI S TI N G 8USlNESS P ARK
ENGINEERING P M PEAK HOUR ~q~C IMPACT ANALYStS
707 v►~t 7tn sutte 200 (sos) ~a-seao PROJECT NO 96215
\ Spdcane wA 99204 F,X (509) 458-654400, ~ TR AFFI C VOLU M ES J~ J
1
Tra~c SRfety
Accident summanes available for the most recent three years from Spokane County and WSDOT
for the uiterse,cdons in the study area have been assembled Generally accidents are documented
by type of occurrence, such as property damage or uijury One fatalrty occurred m the study anea
dwrmg the years from 1992 to 1995 This occured at the Niission Avenue/McDonald Road
intersection in October 1995 and underscores the need for a signal at this mtersection Accidents
are measured based on frequency per million enteruig vehicles This ratio is a function of the
average dady traffic enteruig the mtersection and the armwal frequency of accidents
Table 2- Accident data for selected mtersechons wrthin the sludy area
ACCIDEr1'T STATISTiCS
Intersechon 1~ ~.993 1994 1"5 Per
..r.
PD(() ~J , PD!~ INJ PDO I1~J PDQ Il~~'
,
Mission & Evergreen 2, 1 0 0 0 0, 1 0 036
Niission & McDonald 2 0 0 3 4 2 1 2 0 80
Pines 8c I1bssion 20 12 12 12 b 8 12 13 1 71
Pmes & EB Ramps 0 0 1 S 2 2 5 2 0 29
Pines & WB Ramps 1 , 0 1 0 1 3 1 1 0 20
Pines & Indiana 1 1 3 2 3 2 5 1 0 54
Accident rates at these intersections are below 2 00 accidents per million enteruig vehucles, the
threshold for safety unprovements Therefore accident tustory should not te considered a problem
now or m the future Note that the mtersecaon of Pines & Mission has an accident rate which is
close to the 200 accidents per millloa entenng vehicles threshold WSDOT is aware of the
accident history at this intersection and a in the process of designin,g and constructwg some safety
unprovements at this mtersection Because of safety issues, the mtersection of Plnes & Mission
was "split-phased" for east-west traffic As the accident trend shows, ttus change brought the
intersection accident rate down in 1994, but mcreased back to former levels in 1995 A second
southbound left tum Iane is plaiwed for tlus intersection
Plaraned Transportatwn Improvements
The VVSDOT has committed to two projects wluch will unprove the safery and capacity af the
roadway system ua ttus area The first project, scheduled for construchon in 1997 wdl widen the
Inland Pacific Engzneering, Inc 15 Inland Constracction Bcisrness Park TIA
eastbound off ramp to accommodate two nght turn lanes and widen Pmes Road at the Mission
Avenue mterseccion for a second southbound left turn lane The second project, scheduled for
construction m 1998 will widen Pmes Road at the westbound ramp terminal intersection to
accommodate a second left tum lane for the traffic gouig westbound on I-90
Although a signal has not previously been plannei for the mtersection of Mission & McDonald,
due to the need for one, it will be assumed that the Connty will mstall one some tune in the future
It should be noted that the proposed project does add traff'ic to tlus mtersechon However,
warrants for the signal are met wrthout the addibonal busuiess park traffic
Backgnound Projects
The basis for addluonal trlps from other proposed projects is the vaformation on background
projects from the Ridgeview Estates Apartment Conunwuty traffic unpact analysis Other projects
beyond those in that report were also mcluded
The Ridgeview Estates Apartment Commuiuty traffic unpact analysis identified twa projects for
inclusion in this study as backgraund projects They are the Lawson HoteUOffice complex and
the Wolff Conunercial site The Lawson HoteUOffice complex is a proposed 200 room hotiel and
20,000 square feet of office space The Trtp Generairon Manual, Sth Edition by the Instuute of
Transportation Engineers has land use category 710, General Office Budding and land use
category 312, Busmess Hotel which accurately model the proposed land uses of the Lawson site
The second project idenUfied by the Rrdgeview Estates Apartment Commuiuty traffic unpact
analysis as a background project is the Wolff Commercial site In discussions with Jamie Wolff,
the followuig land uses were identified The westerrunost building on the site is a 9,000 sq ft
building on each of two floors The top ground-level floor will be retail, modeled usuig the
Shopping Center (#820) Iand use category ui the ITE Tnp Generation Manual, Sth Editron
(TGM) The bottom floor will have 6,000 sg ft of leasable area for off'ice space, and 3,000 sq
ft of storage area The office space was raodeled usuig the General Office Buildmg (#710) land
use caLegory The storage area is not expected to generate any trips
Along the northern perimeter of Jamie Wolff's property, a three floor, 6,000 sq ft per floor
office complex has been approved This ovas also modeted using the General Office Budduig
(#710) land use category
At the northwest comer of Mission and Pmes and the southeast corner of the site, a restaurant is
proposed This restaurant was modeled as a High-Tu.rnover (Sit Down) Restaurant, land use
category #832
Ninety-five percent of the traffic from these uses is expected to use the mtersection of Pmes &
Mission From this mtersechon, the traffic was eacpected to distribute rtself sinularly to what the
Inland Pacific Engineercng, Inc 16 Inland Construcnon Busrness Park TIA
present distribuvon of traffic is dependmg upon which peak hour was beuig exarnined
Other projecis not mcluded as background projects in the Ridgeview Estates Apartment
Community traffic unpact analysis are 1) The trips from Ridgeview Estates Apartment
Commuiuty, 2) A?2 unit Retuemern Complex south of Mission Aveaue betwan Evergreen Road
and Mamer Road (Land Use 250), 3) Phase 1 tnps from the Inland Construcuon Busuiess Park
(Land Use 150 & 710)
There are other projects in the ptammng phase that we are aware of, but have not been iacluded
m the background trafHc These were not mcluded be:ause the buildout of those projects is
beyond completion of this project These projects are the I.awson/Gunning project, Muabeau
Point project, and "The Mall" project
The trip generauon rates for these land uses aze shown on the following table Anricipated trlp
distribution characterisucs are shown on Figures 6 and 7 which follow
Table 3- Tnp Generanon Rates for Background Projects - PM Peak Hour
,
PM Peak Hour
Land Use Size Entenng Exitmg
ftte Volwne Percmt Volume Percent Yflluume
,
Hotel 200 0 62 124 60% 74 40% 50
Rooms
Office 20 k s f 2 92 58 17% 10 83 % 48
Buildmg*
Strip Mall 9 k s f 15 14 136 50 % 68 50 R' 68
Offic.e 24 k s f 2 68 64 17 % 11 83 % 53
Building"
Restaurant 5 5 k s f 1292 71 56 % 40 44 % 31
Apartcnents 317 units 0 63 200 68% 136 32% 64
Retirement 72 units 0 28 20 56% 11 44% 9
Business 30 k s f 1 48 44 N/A 10 N/A 34
Park
* - Lawson site
Wolff site
Inland Paccfic Engtneercng, Inc 17 Inland Construction Busrness Pdrk TIA
r
lmm,*N
N ~
~
b
16 c*tr
4
INDIANA/MONTGOM
~
~
m
~ NOT TO SCALE
15 ~
o~
~ W 60UND RAMPS
~
o ~
~ 90
V) 98 cls~
z
. 0-
E. 80UND RAMPS
m ~
~
~
,s NORA AVENUE !
0
Q
. 4~ 0 ~
M N N I
W ~
~
r c~v o Q
54 89 g 2
78 69 154 -4> 70 59 ~D Q= 43 40 ~ C~ 28
21 ~ ~34 20 ~ ? 15 Q 23 ~ Q
O
Of
MISSION AVENUE o w.
~ w
~
Z C~
O ~
0 ~
WJ
I NLAND FlGURE 5 INLAND CONSTRUCTION 1
PACIFIC B ACK GR 0 U N D BUSINESS PARK
ENQINEERiNQ P M PEAK HOUR TRqFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
`707 wesc 7th Uitie Zoo (509) 458-6a4o TR C VO LU M E S PROJECT Id0 96215 ~
Spokcne, WA 99204 FAX (809) 488-6844
Trcp Generalton and Drstribulwn
Usuig the Inshtute of Transportation Engmeers' (ITE) Trcp Generatcon Manual, Sth Edation, the
anticipated number of trips to be generated on adjacent streets by the proposed projeet was
determmed The Trip Generation Manual (TG1V) provides empmcal data, based upon actual field
observations for uip generaaon charactenstic of sunilar projects throughout the Umted States
The TGM provides aip generation data for Phase 2 of Inland ConstrucUon Busuiess Park Ls shown
ua Table 4 which follows
Table 4- Tnp Generatwn Rutes for Busmess Park
PM Peak Hour
Land Use Size Entering Emhng
Rate ab Valwme % VQlume
Warehouse 27 1 k s f 0 74 35 % 7 65 % 13
Office Buildmg 40 6 k s f 2 42 17 % 17 83 % 81
Totals 24 94
Based upon existug ADT's along the adjacent roadways, the peak hours' directional and turntng
volumes at each mtersection and field observations of prunary dnver characteristics detemun.ed
during actual field observauons and wtersection counts, the anucipated tnp distribution and
assignment wittnn the general area was deternuned for the proposed proJect Three scenarios were
evaluated for future roadway condiUons They are as follows
1) Without Evergreen Interchange The Evergrcen Intercliange may not be consiructed and
open to trai~'ic for several years In the mean tune, biuldout will occur for this project
This scenario evaluates traffic durmg this tune penod
2) With Evergreen Interchange and a southbound left turn at Mamer Road/Mlssion Avenue
intersection allowed Left turns at this intersection are currently allowed with yield
conuol In icy condiUons, vetucles wiU expenence difficulty clunbing the steep slope and
waiting for a break in traff'ic, and starting up the hffl again to turn Ieft onto Mission
Avenue
3) With Evergreen Interchange and a southbound left tum at Mamer Road/Mission Avenue
intersection not allowed Under this scenarlo left turn and through movements at
MamerlMission intersecuon would be prohibited by channeLzahon A rlght turn only
Inland Pact, fic Engtneertng, Inc 19 Inland Constructton Business Park TIA
condiaon would exist with a lane so no stopping would be requued This would help out
those climbuig the steep grade m icy condiaons, but would huider easy access to the
Evergreen mtercbange
The following assumptions were used in determmuig the distn'buaon of the site generated tnps
1) Without the Evergreen Interchange
For the exituig tnps
0 10% will go toward areas north of the Pmes Interchange From the site they will acc,ess
Pmes Road by way of Nora Road
0 40% will go toward areas west of the Pmes Interchan,ge usvqg the WB on-ramp From the
siLe they will ac,cess Pmes Road by way of Nora Road
• 25 % will go toward areas south of the Mission/Pines intersection From the site they will
go to M~.ssion and then south onto Pmes Road
• 5% will go south on McDonald Road
• S% will go south on Evergreen Road
• 5% will go east on Mission Ave
• 10% will go east on I 90 From the site they wlll go to the Pmes Interchange usmg Nora
Road and ihen onto the Freeway usmg the Eastbound on ramp Even though tliere is some
backtrack anth thLS route, there are no signal to go through, only rlght hirns A route to
the Sullivan interchange would mean a left turn onto Mission, and a signal at SuUivan
Road
For enteruig tnps
• Tnps entetug will be comung with the same datnbution percentages as where exihng tnps
are gomg
• Nora Ave wdl be used for enteruig trips oniy for half of those commg from south of the
Niission/Pues urtersecrion All others will use MLSSion Ave and Mamer to get to the site
2) WYth Evergreen Interchange - Left turn aUowed at Mamer & Mimoa
Same assumpaons as #1 with the following exceptions
Inland Paci, fic Engineenng, Inc 20 Inland Construction Business Park TIA
~
N ~
~
4
~
INDIANA ONTGO
1%
NOT TQ SCALE
b
~Q
0 ~ W BOUND RAMPS
o ~
Q N
O ~
cr 90
W 4CZ!kr
Z ~
a. w
N
E. BOUND RAMPS
4
~
~ N OR A AVEN U E
4 24
0
a
~ o
cr
~
cr
W
~
Q
O N n ~
10 ~ ~10
~20 9~ ~4 ~
M
0 O
nn ~ ~
MISSION AVENUE ~ z ~
~ W.
Q w
O ~
NOTE LEFT TURN A MAMER ROAD ~
~ AND MISSION VENUE ALL01NE0
W
( NL~p ~ FlGURE 7 INLAND CONSTRUC110N
PACIFIC SITE GENERATED 8US'lNESS PARK
ENQINEERING WITH EVERGREEN I/C
707 wat 7tn .suits zoo (sos) 4ss-6e4o P M PEAK HOUR TftnFFlC IMPACT ANALYSIs
~Spo~ane, wA 99204 FAx. (sos) 4se ` TRAFFIC VOLUMES PROJECT P10 96215 J
~
N ~
b
r
4
INDIANA/MONTGO
N ~
NOT Td SCALE
f2
~co W BOUND RAMPS
0
Q ~
o g
ix 90
V)
W 9
Z
Z ~
E. BOUND RAMPS
.
n
~
8 N OR A AVEN U E
qa 48
0
Q
~ o
ci:
W
2
a
17 3
18 r-'-0 Q=y 20 Za ~ 12 ~
Q Q
o 0
~ cr-
MISSION AVENUE o We
Q w
o ~
NOTE LEFT TURN A MAMER ROAD ANO w
0
MISSION AVE E NOT ALLOWED >
w~
-
INLAND FlGURE 8 ~ r INl.MO CONSTRUCnON
PACtFIC SI TE GEN ER ATED 8USlNESS PARK
ENQINEERiNQ WTH EVERGREEN I/C
707 wesc 7cn •s„ne zoo (809) 458-6840 P M PEAK HOUR TRAffIC IMPACT ANALYSlS
~sp~e WA 99204 Fpac (wg) 4se-6e4a, ` TRAFnC VOLUMES J~ PROJECT NO 96215 J
_
~Z17'URE YEAR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS, ASSUMPTIONS AND MET80DOLOGIES
Puaune year evenn4g weMay peak hour mnpam of the potentcal traffic generat,ed by the proposed
projects along Mission Avenue and Pmes Road were analyzed as follows
• Trip generation estunat,es of the future mormng and evenmg peak honr mgs for the
oomplet,ee buffd out of th,e backgroun,d snd subject pro1ects were assumed to follow the Tnp
Generation Manual, Sth Edltron or as updatod
• Traffc volumes on each trnnsportation system elem+ent at bwld out were determined
assumiqg the exisEn traffic would expenenoe a 3% per year compounded growth rate due
to w~uden~fied souroes Ide~fiied backpwnd proJects listed previonsly were uicluded
above the 3% growtb rate
• Trip assqpments from the background projects are as shown va Figure 5 Most of the
traff'ic from thew projects is expected tio use the mtersec#ion of Mission & Pines and to
disperse from there
• Forecasted traffic volumnes for Phase 2 of the Inland Construction Basuiess Park as
generated from the 1TE Th,p Generatcon Manual, Sth Edrtcon were then added tro the
background traffic to determme the cumulative traff'ic mapacts
• Level of semce analyses were then performed for the vnthout develogment and anth
development traffic scenanos in order to identify any capacity or level of service
deficiencies due to th,e development of the propased project on erther MLssion Avenue or
Puies Road
• Build out of the Phaae 2 of the Inland Construction Busmess Park is anticipated to be
complete ia 1997 Therefore, 1997 Ls the baseline year of thus study
• ImprovemenLs scheduled for Pmes Road by WSDOT and mstallation of a signal at Mission
Avenue/McDonald Road iniersection were assumed to be cvmpieted as part of the
improvements by others
BUILD OUT LEVEL OF SERVICE
Level of service calculations were made for bwld out of the busuiess pazk, anticipated in 1997
Analyses for conditions both with and without the proposed project were performed with the three
Inland Pacific Engineenng, Inc 25 Inland Consrrucnon Business Park TIA
scenanos concerning Evergreen Interchange These analyses will show how the ~c volume~s
will be bandled by the exisnn facility or wbat new elemeM aill be needDd for the traffic sy$tem
t , o c o n t m u e worln at aviceptable levels of servwe Based upon de exisriM levels of service, the
utersection of Mission & McDonald is presently at u~oeptable levels of serrm Therefore,
chMes at this mterseetion are cmxady n,ooded and the need for changes will only uncre,ase in the
future
The background mffic volumes mclude the exisnng traffic, the Lawson HoteUOffice complex,
the Wolff Comm+ercial site, a 72 nnit retirement complex on Evergreen Road, the Ridgeview
Estaties Apartrnent Comm~ty, Pbase 1 of the Inland Consaumon 8usmess Fart and a
compounded growth rate of 3% per year on all of th,e stroets See FWre S for the traffic volnmes
from the bac$ground projects and Fignre 9 for the t,otal background traffi'ic volumes used A
summary of the HCS results is shown in Table S wluch follows
Table 5- Buald Out Year T;hcpc Witl:out PrVosed Pr+oject
~ ~p~+ ~y
.~P~ ~ ~ MNC. 3
1?~+DO1~ d- WT~ F~~P
q 5r ~ a ~`/v f'~ ' v~ F4 ` 5'
+b 3.~~ c _ vw+, „ ~
4
~'n> av
4f 8 Xr a4+'e ~G~+,fi,^. , a.... ~ ,r.. . . <t~,. . r s+r'G4
. v , . . . , Pmes RdJlndana Ave 131 sec B 12 6 sec B
, Pmes Rd./WB Remps 43 7 sec E 24 6 sec C
, Pmes Rd./EB Ramps 86 2 sec F 33 8 sec D
Pmes Rd./Nora Road 81 sec B(*) 81 sec B(*}
,
Pmes Rd./Mission Ave 48 0 sec E 37 8 sec D
Niission Ave /McDonald Road 411 sec F(*) 13 0 sec B
, Missioa AveJMamer Road 115 sec C(*) 115 sec C(*)
, -
Mission Ave /Evergreen Road 17 2 sec C(*) 17 2 sec C(*)
Denotes wisignalzed intersection.
For unsignalzed uuersections, delay and level of service shown indicat,es the worst movement
through the mtersection
Without any unprovements to the wansportarion system, the addit~onal tnps added to the
transportation system not mclucimg the proposed project, will cause the level of service at the
Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc 26 Inland Constrztction Business Park TIA
fr r ■ ~s ~t i ~
/001 ~
lf~2 115
14 ~J ~ 4B
=Q_ ,G~ 83
4 ~v,
INDIANA/MONTGOM
..s
~
4$ NOT TO SCALE
~Q
W BOUND RAMPS
0
/010~
=10 90
W loeaQ%F
Z
FL
' E, BOUND RAMPS
NORA AVENUE
0
0
4~ a
W
~
, Q
NFf~ N*N i
40
~ 21~1 c=J C-244 12 c:P 14
588 c'J 4- 393 448 =:C* G-384 304 ~ 4'~ 28S
56 czk, 23p4_ ~ gg 4rs 2 1625~ ~ 43
° o t, ~r
~ ~ o
no
~
MISSION AVENUE o w
Q w
i Z
~ O Cf.
FlC. INLAND 1 IlRE 9 ~INLAND CONSIR UCTION
T ~
~ PACIFIC 11- 1997 BUItD OUT BUSINESS PARK
k ENQINEERINC3 P M PEAK RHOURT TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALY5IS
707 wesc 7n+ suits 200 (sos) aga-ssao PROJECT NO 96215
~spokm,e wA ssM FAx (soe) 4ss-ss44 ~ ` TR AFFI C VOLU M ES l` J
Pines Raad/WB I-90 rannp mtersecuon to shp from LOS Dto LOS E, the Pmes RoadlEB I-90
ramp inwsecifton to slip from LOS D to LOS F, the Pmes RmdMmm Avemie intersection to
shp from LOS D to IAS E, anid the Mission Avenue/Mamer Road mtiersection to slip from LOS
B co LOS C With the proposed i~rovements on Pmes Raad and the addsaonal tnps added to
the transportalfton system not uvcludxng the proposed projeci, the level of service at the Pmes
Road/WB Ramps will maprove from LOS D Lo LOS C and the level of service at the Pmes
RoadlEB ramps will unprove from LLOSS F tro LOS D If a signal is wstalled at the Mission
Aveme/McDonald R+oad intersection, the level of servioe wffl improve from LOS F to IAS B
Usuag tbe mimber of g~erated trips shown on Table 4 and est~matied tnp distfflbmons shown on
Figures 6, 7 8c 8 an+d addlimg it to the background traffic, the total mumber of trrps projected to use
the tranaportation system at build aut is obtamed Figures 10, 11 & 12 show the future traff'ic
volumes imder these conchtcons Usmg these future traffiic volumes, build aut year level of sernce
calculattons are performed and the resuits are displayed in Tables 6, 7& 8
Table 6- BMW Out Year T,h~f'ic ath Proposed Pnvject
NUout Evergreen Intenchange
,
tir •
~ 4. ~~•y! ,~5~yy~y~ y< "f { ~ ~ L r F 1¢•kout .'9~ h*PDFOM6I`wt*&
~EtAY AIM an 'k .M1M1 }'y
. ,
Pmes Rd /Indiana Ave 13 3 sec B 12 6 sec B
Pmes RdJWB Ramps SO S sec E 22 2 sec C
Pmes R,dJEB Ramps 84 8 sec F 38 8 sec D
Pmes RdJNora Road 9 3 sec B(*) 9 3 sec B(*)
,
Pmes Rd./Missaon Ave 50 4 sec E 39 5 sec D
Mission Ave /McDonald Road 479 sec F(*) 12 8 sec B
, Mission Ave /Mamer Road 12 8 sec C(*) 12 8 se.c C(*)
Denotes unsignahzed mtersectlon
Wxthout any improvements to the transportaaon systiem, the addiaonal tnps added to the
tiransportation system by the proposed project, will cause the delay bmes tio increase shghtly, but
will not change the level of service at any of the interser.iions over the biuldout Rnthout project
condmons wnider this senano With the proposed ~rovements on Pines Road, there wdl be no
chan,ge in the level of service between bwldout vinth or buildout vsnthout the pmject conditions
Inlnnd Pacific Engineenng, Inc 28 Inland Construction Buscness Park 77A
~
' Table 7- Build Out Yeat 7hq& With Propased Pro}ect
Eveqreen Inter+chatnge, Left Tarn at bdamer LttersectWn.A'llo~ve~d
3 ~ • titi f S ~ { Y} Y f6MCd~'~'.'~e' } l - ++hPn~ Yr • 3
~ ~,lS ~5Y5'`~•33v.a~i_. ~t` . . c _ {Y h 5. . .
Y
F y
~r" : ~ Ak
~ ~ ~ ' ;=+r ~ _`r
,~,~J..a . k' . , L . x ~ ?r _ h ~ +•4~ S.n.
. V I .
Pines RdJlndiana Ave 13 3 sec B 12 6 sec B
, .
Pines Rd./VVB Remps 45 5 sec E 213 sec C
,
Pines Rd.IEB Ramps 80 9 sec F ~ 37 4 sec D
,
Pmes Rd./Nora Road 8 7 sec B(*) 8 7 sec B('`)
-
Pines Rd /Mission Ave 49 8 sec E 37 9 sec D
Mission Ave /McDonald Road 464 sec F(*) 13 0 sec B
,
Mission Ave./M.amer Road 12 7 sec , CM 12 7 sec , C(*)
Denotes u=gnalized mtersection
Without any improvements tio the transporman system, the addibonal tnps added to the
~ transportation system by ft proposed projecx; anll cause the delay ttmes to mcrem, but the level
of service will renlam the same over th+e buddout Rnthout prolect condrtwns under thLS senano
With the proposed unprovemenis on Puies Road, there will be n+o clange m the level of service
between bluldout with or buildout without the project condiuons
~
i Inland Pactfic EngrneenRg, Inc 29 Inland Constructwn Busrness Park TIA
Table 8- Btdld Out Yeacr Pnoposed a nvject
WM Evergreen Intenchange, Left Tkirn ot Mwner Intersechon No Allowed
v. 4.10 ~
V~~ir i~~ ~ .1~ •
`.~'a' t ~ "~K v 4'~+~ M,Z~'? ~fi ~K~~'~~~ f~.o9. a~w ~ t~. ~ ~"n@f`v , • ...Wi.~'
o; ~ Ay, { r S nr
+Y ~ 4 C
~ ~w. x '~`Gtih~ GA M,`4 ~r;~~~ n~f ~ ~ ~ Yi ~ w ~ r ~
Pmes R,d./Indiana Ave 13 3 sec B 12 6 se,c B
Pmes RdJWB Ramps 510 sec E 22 2 sec C
Pmes Rd /EB Ramps 84 8 sec F 38 9 sec D
,
Pmes Rd./Nora Road 61 sec B(*) 61 sec B(~`)
Pmes Rd./Mission Ave SO 4 sec E 37 S sec D
, Mission AveJMcDonald Road 511 sec F(*) 12 6 sec B
Mission Ave /1Vlamer R,oad 13 0 sec CM 13 0 sec C(*)
Denotes wnsignalized intersection.
Withaut any mnprovements to the transportarian system, the additional tnps added to the
transportauon system bY the Proposed PI'oJect, will cam the delay tima tio mc,rease, but the levels
of service will remain the same over the bwldout anthout project conditions under tus senario
With the proposed improvements on Pmes Road, there will be no change in the level of service
between bwldont with or bwldout wrthout the proJect conditions
Indand PacUic Engtneertng, Inc 30 Inland Co»stncctron Business Park M
T T ~
~
a~~
83
g i~
INDIANA MONTGOM
_s
~
4P 8 NOT TQ SCALE
a~
4
~ W BOUND RAMPS
o
~ o ^
ce
~ 90
W 1o~~
?
a. ~ mli
E. BOUND RAMPS
NORA AVENUE ~
o -
o
~
0°
r N
.i.
W
~
~;oi~
/0001~~
tesCP 4p %0~.a1s 29✓~ 4s 17
~tb c=2~ ca~~ a~ t~~ a~
~i t~ ~ ~ ~ Q
~4e ae Q a4r a ~p o
0 ~
IMiSSiON AVENUE 9 W
a ~
o ~
o ~
w
~ INLAND \ FlGURE 10 INLAND CONSTRUC110N
PACiFIC 1997 6UILD OUT BUSlNESS PARK
ENQIIVEERiNQ W 0 EVERGREEN I/C ~
707 west 7nh • S,ite zoo (sos) 458-6840 M PEAK H OU R p p,~~ NO 9625~S
~SPolcana wA 99204 FAx. (sos) 4.~-s~r ` TRAFFIC VOLUMES J~ J
~ ■
K & ~
~
~1~ ~
=C* If u
INDIANA MONTGO
~
dp ~ NOT TO SCALE
a ~
~04
of
w eouND RAMPS .
° ~ b~
~0 90
W
z
-
a ~
E. BOUND RAMPS
NORA AVENUE
. o
o
oc
~
CA:
W
~
y
~~V~Q ~ ~
v
199 S18 22 Q24
21l c=J 44=244 678 a 413 448 -9► C-384
ssct
4 ~'se zs° toa 4c%
4 2 0
p Q 44~ Q
p o
MISSION AVENUE w
~ W
Q
M ~
Z
O cr-
~ NOTE LEFT TURN A MAMER ROAD ALLOWED ~
` Wo/
#40 T ~ I NLAND ~ F1FlRE 11 1 T r T 7 ~
, INLAND ~NSIRUCTION
PACiFIC 1997 WITH PROJECT BUSyNESS PARK
ENQtNEERINa WI TH EvERGREEN I/C
707 wec 7tn S,it. zoo (S09) 488-8840 P M PEAK HOUR TRAFFlC IMPACT ANALYSiS
`s;okane WA 99204 FAx (M) 4W-6s4a~ ` TR AFFI C VOLU M ES J~ PROJECT NO 96215 ~
T
c~
-c*=
33Z~ ~ 83
INDIANA/M4NTGOM
N p ~
s ~
NOT TO SCALE
a ~
fzU
~Q
w BouNp RAMPs
Q
o
/01
cr 25°`P 90
W
Z Q~
-
~
E BOUND RAMPS
~82 NORA AVENUE
0
4p o
cr-
cr
W
4PbWO
sa6-::> a03 448 ~ 4-364
58~~~ ZJO~ ~111 4q~r ~ 2
a Q~' ~~i
m'r
o
0 cr-
lx Z
IMISSION AVENUE ~ WE
Q w
z
0 NOTE LEFT ?URN AT MAMER ROAO cl:
~ NOT ALLOWED wj
~ W
~ I NLAND 0% /0 FlGURE 12 ~/00 INLAND CONS7RUCTiON
PACIFIC 1997 WITH PROJECT BUSINESS PARK
ENGINEERING WI TH EVERGREEN I/C
707 rxnc 7tn suice aoo (sos) ass-saao P M PEAK H OU R TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSiS
svokm+a wA 99204 F,UC (5w) 4s--6844 ~ ` TR AFFI C VOLU M ES J` PROJECT NO 96215
The additton of the Inland Consttuction Busmess Park, Phase 2 will not canse any of the
Yntersearons t,o fall uiLo unacceptable levels of semce wnh the impr+oyements that are sch,ednled
for constnu,tion. If none of the scheduled improvemeMs are consaucted on Pmes Road, leveLs
of service will be below acceptable levels for the westbouad and eastboun+d ramp ~ections and
the Mission Avenue u-m-rsection Note that the uvbersection of Mmon & McDonald was analyzed
as a signahzed mtersection for the "With Improvenaents" scmno If thLS intersection is left
unsignalzed, the PM peak hour level of service will be at F with 400 to 500 seconds of delay
dependYn,g on the Evergreen Intercbange for the worst moveanent. As statecl before, the other
interser,ttons are expected to operate ai aoceptable levels of sennce until after the build out of thus
project
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the analy8is, field observations, assuniptions, methodologies and results which are
provided in the body of tius document, it a concluded diat the migacts to the overall area
transportation system from developmg this property are miniaal Tius con,clusion was reached
and is documented anthtn the body of ttus report
• The unsignalizeci uiiersections anthin the projecx area are presently fun+ctioning at
1eve1 of sernce C or better with the exception of Mission Avenue & McDonald
Road I?urmg the PM peak hour, this intersection is presently fuactioning at level
of service F The signalized intiersectwns anthin the study area ar+e currently
functionM at level of service D or better
• The uicrease m hmffic withm the next year iWthout the additioa of the Phase 2
Inland Construcaon Business Park trips will lower the level of service ai the
followmg intersecnons, Pmes and the eastbound I-90 ramp terminal inLersection
(LOS D to LOS P), Puies and the westbound IAO ramp termYnal mtersection (I.4S
D to LOS E) and the Pmes and Mission Avenue mtersectxon (I.OS D to IAS E)
With WSDOT scheduled vnpmvements, the IAS for the above intersections on
Pmes Road will improve to IAS D The level of service at Mission and McDonald
durmg the PM peak hour will remam at LOS F wrthaut signal installation
• Without the scheduled unprovements on Pmes Road, the addztaon of the progosed
Pbase 2 Inlan+d Conshuction Business Park project would cause the level of sernce
at the iniessection of Pmes & westbound I 90 ramp termmals to drop frvm LOS D
to LOS E in all of the Evergreen Interchange scenanos Also without the
scheduled mnprovements on Pmes Road, the addition of the proposed project tnps
will cause the level of service at the intersection of ftes & eastbound I-90 ramp
ternninals to drop from LOS E to LOS F for aU scenanos of the Evergreen
Interchange However, with the scheduled safety and capacity unprovements on
Pmes by WSDOT, there will be no chan,ge m the level of sernoe with the addition
Irrland Pacific Engtneenng, Irtc 34 Inland Corrstru.ction Bustness Park 714
of the Phase 2 Inland Construction Businesa Park project Levels of service will
be LOS D or better wnth or without the proposed projeci for the bwld out year
• There is no a~e.asurable beaefit to the traffic thLS project will generate by bavmg the
Evergreen Inberchange constructed Companung the delay times in Tables 6, 7, and
8 for the different scenanos with and without the Evergreen Interchange, there is
no appreciable improvement m the delay tvmes Rnth the Evergroen Intie~~hange over
anthout the Evergreen Interchange
RECOrLMENDATIONS
Based upon the analysis presented, the proposed development of the Pbase 2 Inlaad Construcrion
Business Park will have no significant impact on the tcansportation system wnttua the general
geographic area In order to implement this project and provide th+e safest possible ingress and
egress available, not only to tlus proposed development, but also to surroundmg properties and
existing commuter traffic, the followmg recom~a~endations should be mcorporat,ed mo the project
• Frontage unprovements as required by the County
• Futore participation in the McDonald/Mission intersectton signal improvements
based on add~onal PM peak hour trvs added to the intersection from the project
Inland Pacafic Engineertng, Inc 35 Inland Constructcon Busaness Park TIA
oo~
, ~ ~ .
_ TSC~`~~
.
'
~
.sr+-115,.,.._ ._._PIJtY 6~ _ _ • IL' S a _
. _ . v.... . _ - 3'+..-.-
~rrn
UN ilW .Aimm I~
~ ~F.2151"WI(CZE
♦
A - Man dm adeq*t+e gp avM~able to proqeed.
- yenr se~d m"ea+e more thaa one vehicle u1 the q=&
8 - iddw eaoo~unterod wuh adequa~e ava~abl,e
ooun
-OocasionAy,thea+e is more than one veRe ia dte qneue .
,
- De~ys are short but peusteat as die numbes of g~ neduce
C I aad dnver oomfort bps
- Usna~lly there is moare:-Man one velucle in the quene ,
- Always at least one vehucle in thequeue
D - Dnvers foel qu~te restnct~od due to ~he few gaps awdilable ui
which to mal& a safe turning mavement
,
- DMays ane long and at tlus los dnvers may begin looling for
atbeanahve routes~ao to enterinz the queue
B - R+epre~s~e~ts a a~it~on in wbich tbe, dedaad eqvals ar exweeds
the safe of vducles throvgh the ~ntiersectioa
- A1waYs more than one vebscle m the queue
,
- Delays are long, dnve;r frastrauon is lugh and it is not
F uaubal to see dnvers m the queue tum arouad to find
= a]lb~oahve rou~es '
- FCreOd floWi httle t4 n0 avallable gaps
RepreSeats an uiterseCtion at failnre condztion ,
,
UIM][GNAIMZED IN'TERSECTIONS
LEVEL OF SERVIClE CRITERYA
12
~
5 .A Little of No Delay
S- 10 B Short Trafflc Delays _
> 10 - 20 C Averaee Tra~"ic Delaqs
> 20 - 30 D - Lon4 Traffic Delays
> 30 - 45 B Very Long Zraffic Delays
> 45 F Fro~gressioa 33real~down
r S"toWed Condihon .
szGNALEM INsa~rrorts
~11DIVIDUAL LFTM OF S1; 110 YICIE DF.SCR~'I'IONS
,
A I.ittle to no delay, r a~es11n . Short ~ c five sooon~
r p~ v elucley Orvichrela do not sbop cy W~gths
,~„mav also oontributie to law delay.
B Average " delay n in the range of 51 to 15 0 seooa~
ve~lee. T~s geneerally owm with good gsn~on andfor short
~
cycle le,nohs.
C Ave~,ge stiapped delay is ~n the ran,ge of 15 1 to 25 0 sevonds per
vehicle. These h;gher dehys may resnlt from ~ur rog~
aad/or longex e u;~gths The number of vehtc s~s~ n
sien~fic~nt at dus yci
lev~l.
,
D Aveacage sWpped delays ar+e in the range of ZS 1 tio 40 0 seoonds pea
vehucle The uifluenoe of ngestion becomes more notioeable
Longer delays may result from some ooinbinatLon of unfavotable
rngression long c yc1_e Iength, or htgh volumel ty ratios
if no~ ali, ve~bicl+~s stop Tius ~s oo to be the liaut of
acoeptable de1;y
,
B A~e s~topped delays are ~n the range of 441 to 60 0 seoonds
v per
h~gh delay values geqerqIly indicate poor
..prngmaon, Qni,,,cvcle lengths, and lugh volumelcakmty ratios
F, Avw
jge s delsy a in excess of 64 seoondsger vetucle Thns
oondttion o oocurs with over ~aturation of ~ntersectLon. It
, may also omrr wdh volumeJcapacity ratios of 10 or abave
SIGNALIZED INTERS ~CTIONS
LEVEL OF SF.RVICE FIvF-RTA
,
~
m,,
A <=50
B 5.1 t0 15 0
C 151t0250
D 25 1 to 40 0
B 40.0 to 60.0
F > 60 0
Source Transportation Reseazch Boani, "Mghway Capacity Manual," Speclal Report 209
(1994)
LEYEL OFSERVICE
Level of serrvtce (L,OS) is a quahfiable premise developed by the transporration profemon to
quantify dnver perception for such elements as travel tune, number of stops, total amount of
stopped delay, and impecLment~ caused by other vehicle,s afforded to dnvers who utilize the
t~ranspormon aetwork. It has been defined by the Transportahon Research Board in Special
R,eport No 209, the 1994 Highway Capacity Mcmual This document bas quaatified level of
semce mto a range from "A" which indicates httle, Yf any, vehicle delay, to "F" wtuch uckcates
sign~iicant velucle delay aad traffic congestion which may lead to system breekdown due to
volume4 which may far exceed capacrty
Signaked Interseciwns
For signalized vatersections, recent research has deternuned that average stopped delay per
vehicle is the best avulable measure of level of servxce The technical appendix of this report,
iacludes a section on the Level of Service, Methods and Cntena. The tables ia the technical
appendix identify the relahonslugs betweea level of sermce and average stopped delay per
velucle Usmg tius defiiution as presented m the Highway Capacrty Manual, level of sennce D is
generally considerel to represeat the minimum acceptable design standard for sigaalized
mtersections in aa urban srea such as this
UnsWulPied Intersections
Th+e calculation of level of service (LOS) at an unsignahzed oneJtwaway stop-controlled
mtersection is exea~ned m the TiansportoLtion Research Board's 1994 Special Report 209, The
Htghway Capacity Mamul For umsignalized intersecgons, level of service is based on the delay
expenenc.ed by each movement qnthn the mtersection
The concept of delay as presented for unsignaliaed intersections va the I~'ighway C,apacity Maaual
is based on the amount of time a vehicle must spend in the mtersection Vehicles passing straight
through the mtersection on the major (uncontrolled) street expenence no delay at the mtersection
On the other haad, vehicles wlnch are tummg left from the aunor street, because they must yield
the nght of way to ali nght turnwg velucles, a111eR turniag vehicle from the mayor street and a11
tbrough velucles on both the minor and major streets, must spend more time at the intrersection
Levels of service are assigned to indzvidual movements vrnthin the intersection, and are based
upon the delay expenenced by each movement or approach
The Transportatton Research Board has detennined what levels of service for unsignahzed
intersections should be, by designatiag level of service A through F, where level of service A
represents a facihty where no velucle in any movement is delayed very long and Ievel of service
F wluch represents a facility where there is exc,essive delay for the average velucle in at le,ast one
movement in the intersecbon. Level of service E has been defined as the minimum acceptable
level of service for this area.
,
i
,All level of service analyses descxibed m tlus report were perfouned m accordaace wxth the
procedures descnbed above As afinal nate, the Mghway Capacity Manual (HC1Vn;analysis and
procedures are besed upoavvorst case conditions Therefore, most of each v~veekday and the
weekends will expenence traffic conditions better than those descnbed withm ttus docwnent,
which are only for the peak hours of operation.
~
~
~
DrsTING
LEVELS OF SERVICE
p +iJ e, Fm FFitbL 4wDl Y"tonl S
Mission & Pines Ocnuba 221 1996
Lanes, Voluinos, and Timings Summary
m A w A H m w m Ld L'i m ~J
EBL EBT EBR VYBL WBT WBR 1+L JUBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Votume (vph j 131 129 36 99 170 415 20 977 45 348 1272 967
Adj Lene Grp Vol 0 323 0 0 294 432 21 1118 O 362 1574 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 O 1 2 0
Satd Flow (Pmt.) 3582 3662 1583 1770 3703 1770 3662
Setd Flow (Perm ) 3582 3662 1583 1770 3703 1770 3662
Left Tum Type Spld Spot Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 1 6 6 7 4 3 8
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cument Spld (s ) 20 20 20 20 S 35 25 52
YellowTime(8) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
V/C Rabo 0 53 0 47 0 70 0.24 0 94 0 93 0 88
Platoon Factor 100 100 100 100 100 0 84 1 10
Average Oefey (s ) 29 29 13 35 36 48 23
Level of Service D D B D D E C
Cycle Length 100
Offset 60 (60°/b), Reterenced to phase 2-Unused, Begin Of Green
Intersecbon V/C Ratio 81%
Intersechon Delay 28 5
Intersection LOS D
Spiits and Phases, Missfon & Pines
1 3 4
bd6 W7 ~ 8
Synchra 2 0 Report J 1DOCiJME1V11962151PINEPMEX SY4
Inland Pacific Engineermg, IPEC Page 1
EB Ramps & Pines ortoba A 1996
Lanss, Volumes, and TlminBs Sunimary
m A w w H m w M Ld A w ~J
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 243 0 940 0 0 0 0 1383 271 167 984 0
Ad'~. Lane Grp Vol 0 1219 0 0 0 0 0 1772 0 160 1054 0
Lanes 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0
Satid. Fioyv (Prot) 1770 1627 3840 1770 3725
Satid Fbw (Perm.) 1770 1627 3640 1770 3725
Left Turn Type Split Perm Penn Prot
Phase Number 4 4 6 5 2
Ptase Lagging? Yes
Cunent S'pft (s ) 38 36 50 12 62
YeQowTone(s) 40 40 40 40 40
V/C Rath 103 104 100 0 48
Plaboon Factor 100 0 70 1 16 0 84
Average Delay (s ) 58 41 96 8
Lev+e1 of Servioe E E F B
CycW Lerith 100
Oftet 0(0°Yo), Referenoed to phase 2-SBT, Begin Of Green
Int~s-- H on V/C Ratio 103%
Irtersedion Detay 39 6
Inbersechon LOS D
SpIFls and Phases EB Ramps & Pines
2 4
5 6
~
Sync,hro 2.0 Report J 1DOCUMCNT1962151PINEPNIE7C SY4
Inlaad Pacffic Engunsertng, IPEC Page 2
W6 RampS & Pines october 22, 1996
Lanes. Volumes, and Ttminge Summary
21 =1 J-i~ Ffl
EBL, Eff EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 0 0 0 242 1 20 570 882 0 0 927 119
Adj Lene Grp Vol 0 0 0 0 283 0 613 996 0 0 1181 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
Satid Flaw (Prot) 1583 1770 3??5 3666
Satd Flow (Perm ) 1583 1770 3725 3686
L,eft Tum Type Petm Spot Prot Perm
Phase Number 5 5 8 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes
CurneM Spld (s ) 22 22 40 78 38
YellowTime(s) 40 40 40 40 40
V/C Ratlo 0 94 0 94 0.36 0 92
Ptatoon Factor 100 105 2.22 077
Average Delay (s ) 57 39 7 26
Level of Service E D B D
Cyde Length 100
Offseti 49 (49%). Referenced to phase 2-Unused, Begin Of Green
Inhersecdon V/C RaMo 93%
Irrtersecdon Delay 25 5
intersecbon LOS C
Splits and Phases WB Ramps & Pines
4
bd5 bwj 8 L40 7
~
Syncfim 2 0 R,eport J 1DOCUMENTY962151PIINEPMEX.SY4
lnland Pacjf c Engmeermg, IPEC Page 3
Indiana & Pines Ocbobor Z2,1996
Lanes, Volurrses, and Tlmings Summary
El ~ ~ ~ H IS ID -A -A !U LOJ
EBL EI31[ EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR 8BL SBT SBR
Vofume (vph j 50 14 307 81 44 112 129 812 20 9 667 21
Adj Lane Grp Vol 0 395 0 0 252 0 137 928 0 10 768 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Satd Fiow (Prot) 1458 1531 1770 3714 1770 3711
Satid Flow (Pemn ) 1305 1003 371 3714 238 3711
Left Tum Type Perm Perm Petm Perm
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Current Spfit (s.) 48 48 52 52
Yetlow Time (s y 40 40 40 40
V/C Ratio 0 67 0 56 0 75 0 51 0 09 0 42
Piafioon Factor 1 00 1 00 0 57 0 55 100 1 00
Avetage Deley (s ) 19 17 20 7 10 13
Level of Service C C C B B B
Cyde Length 100
Ofiset 94 (9410A), Reibrenced to phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
Intersecdon VIC Ratio 71%
Intersecdon Delay 12.4
IntiersecOon LOS B
Spfib and Phases Indiana & Pines
2 4
-
Syachro 2 0 Report J 1DOCUMEN'I%962151P1NEPMEX.SY4
inlaad Pacific Eqgmeermg, IPEC Page 4
HCS Unsignalized Intersections ReleaBe 2 ic PINOEXPM HCO Page 1
KCenter For Microcomputers In Transportation
ni versity of Florida
,512 Weil Hall
Gaineaville, FL 32611-2083
Ph (904) 392-0376
a~=a=a====~~a=a=a=Q~aa=a=~~==~a==========a=a~~o====c==a==========a-=-~c
Streeta (N-S) Pinea Road (B-W) Nora Road
Major Street Direction NS
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min)
,Analyst Tim Schwab
Date of Analysis 10/17/96
Other Information Fxisting Traffic (10/10/96 counts)
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 1552 5 15
PHF 96 96 96
lGrade 0 0
MC' s M)
SU/RV' s ( ~ )
Cv' s (U
PCE' s 1 10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Le f t Turn Major Road 5 50 2 10
,Right Turn Minor Road 5 50 2 60
Through Traf f ic M3.nor Road 6 50 3 30
Left Turn Minor Road 7 00 3 40
CS Unsignalized Intersectione Releaee 2 lc PINOBBPM HCO Page 2
===a=~==~____==~~~co~aa===~acaa~a~_o~a=saa===~====a=~`~occ~sao~c=====__
Worksheet for TWSC Intersection
L-t- -
ep 1 RT from Minor Street WB EB
Conf licting Flowe (vph) 811
otential Capacity (pcph) 538
ovement Capacity (pcph) 538
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 97
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg 95*
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
imovement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
6 9
R 18 538 6 9 0 0 B
Interaection Delay = 0 1 eec/veh
HCS IInsignalized Interaections Release 2 lc MIMCEXPM HCO Page 1
lCenter For Microcomputers In Transpartation
University of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph (904) 392-0378
===a=~~==_=__=====-aeaaae~~~=~~_----===aa=aa=~a~~a======~a-o=~aoa~n~a
Streete (N-S) McDonald Road ($-W) Misaion Avenue
Major Street Direction EW
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (nuLn)
,Analyst . . Tim Schwab
Date of Analysie . 10/21/96
Other Information Bx.isting Traf f ic
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
$astbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 > 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 394 198 79 305 168 73
PHF 87 87 87 87 87 87
iGrade 0 0 0
MC's
SU/RV' s ( ~r )
Cv's
PCE's 1 10 1 10 1 10
Adjustment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Lef t Turn Major Road 5 50 2 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 50 2 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 50 3 30
iLeft Turn Minor Road 7 00 3 40
CS Unsignalized Interaections Release 2 lc MIMCEXPM HCO Page 2
=====aa~aaa~=====~Oa~~aoa~o~~a~a====a--=~~a=~~~-=a~=======~a~eao~~~aaa
Worksheet for TWSC Intereection
Step 1 RT from Minor 3treet I~ S8
Conflicting Flowa (vph) 340
Potential l Capacity (pcph) 931
ovement Capacity (pcph) 931
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 90
IS_t_e_p__2 LT from Ma~or Street WB FB
Conflicting Flows (vph) 681
lPotential Capacs.ty (pcph) 739
Movement Capacity (pcph) 739
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 86
ILTIT Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 3400
Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob
of Queue-Free State 0 65
Step 4 LT from Minor Street NB SB
iConflicting Flows (vph) 1009
Potential Capacity (pcph) 240
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor 0 85
lAdjusted Impedance Factor 0 85
Capacity Adjuatment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 85
&ovement Capacity (pcph) 204
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) ( sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
NB L 212 204 117 7 8 1 F
83 4
NB R 92 931 4 3 0 3 A
L 100 739 5 6 0 5 B 1 2
Intersection Delay = 16 9 sec/veh
HCS Unsignalized Intereectione Release 2 ic MINtAEXPM HCO Page 1
-aa~= --===~=a~~c~====__=_====~aaa~c=====----=--===~=a===°~______=_
Center For Microcomputers In TransportatYOn
University of Florida
512 Weil 8a11
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Ph (904) 392-0378
Streets (N-S) Mamer Road (8-W) Miseion Avenue
Major Street Direction EW
Length of Time Aaalyzed 15 (min)
,Analyst . Tim 3chwab
Date of Analyaie 10/17/96
Other Information Exieting Traffic (10/09/96 counta)
Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection
_====="'--==~=aa==°=~~========~=====~aaa~=a~a======-========-===~~=====
Eastbound Weetbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 1
Stop/Yield N A1
Volumes 4 378 4 2 331 12 8 4 1 8 4 12
PHF 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Grade 0 0 0 4
MC's
SU/RV' s (t)
CV's (t)
PCE' s 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 70 1 70 1 70
Adjuetment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Lef t Turn Major Road 5 00 2 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 50 2 60
Through Traf f ic Ms.nor Road 6 00 3 30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 50 3 40
HC9 Unsignalized Intersections Release 2 lc MIMABXPM HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC Iatersection
p 1 RT from Minor Street NB SB
IS_t_e____
Conflicting Flows (vph) 396 352
Potential Capacity (pcph) 872 918
Movetrtent Capacity (pcph) 872 918
,Prob of Queue-Free State 1 00 0 98
Step 2 LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows (vph) 398 358
Potential Capacity (pcph) 1106 1157
Movement Capacity (pcph) 1108 1157
Prob of Queue-Free State 1 00 1 00
TH Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 1700 1700
RT Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 1700 1700
,Ma3or LT Shared Lane Prob
of Queue-Free State 1 00 1 00
Step 3 TH from Minor Street NB SB
1Conflicting_Flows__(vph) 760 756
Potents.al Capaca.ty (pcph) 435 438
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movementa 0 99 0 99
Movernent Capacity (pcph) 432 435
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 99 0 98
lStep-4--LT-from-Minor-Street NB 3B
Conflicting Flows (vph) 762 756
Potential Capacity (pcph) 383 386
Major LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor 0 98 0 98
Adjusted Impedance Factor 0 98 0 99
Capacity Adjustaneat Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 96 0 99
Movement Capacity (pcph) 367 381
CS UneYgnalized Intersections Release 2 lc MINfAEXPM HCO Page 3
~=noca==~====~o~caa~===a~==aac_~~o~co~-~===______~=~=~==~-acaacaaaC~~Q
Intereection Performalice Summary
Avg 95%.
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
14ovement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (eec/veh)
mNB 9 367 >
T 4 432 > 401 9 3 0 0 B 9 3
R 1 872 >
B L 14 381 >
$ T 7 435 > 560 7 0 0 2 B 7 0
SB R 22 918 >
L 4 1157 3 1 0 0 A 0 0
L 2 1108 3 3 0 0 A 0 0
Intersection Delay = 0 4 sec/veh
IRCS Uneignalized Intersections Release 2 ic MIEVEBPM HCO Page 1
a = = = = _ _ _ _ = = c = a ac a ao aa a o a o 0 o a aa a = _ = = = a = = = ====o aa ~a c oo ~ = = _ = _ = _
Center For Microcomputere In Tranaportation
Univer8ity of Florida
512 Weil Hall
Gaineeville, FL 32611-2083
Ph (904) 392-0378
=____=_===~======aa~oaaaaao=~==~==__========~==~===o~~aaoaaaaa=a=~~a===
,Streets (N-S) Fvergreen Road (E-W) Mieslon Avenue
Major Street Direction Ew
Length of Tsme Aaalyzed 15 (min)
Analyat Tim Schwab
Date of Analyais 10/24/96
10ther Information Existing Traffic
Two-way 3top-controlled Interaection
==========~===~=_=====~==~=~==================aaa=a=aa=a======~====`co~
Lastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 0 1< 0 0> i 0 0> 0 < 0 0 0 0
lStop/Yield N N
Volumes 249 131 40 224 126 26
PHF 95 95 95 95 95 95
lGrade 0 0 0
MC's
SU/RV' s (t)
cT's 0-)
PCE's 1 10 1 10 1 10
Adjustment Factora
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
,Maneuver Gap ( tg ) Time (t f)
Le f t Turn Major Road 5 00 2 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 50 2 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 00 3 30
iLeft Turn Minor Road 6 50 3 40
CS Unsignalized Interaectione Releaee 2 ic MIEVEXPM HCO Page 2
==-___=~~==~=a~ac=ac=oca=c====~=~=====aca=====-===---=====n~=a=~~==___
Worksheet for TW3C Intersection
9tep_1__RT_from_M3mor_Street NB SB
onflictiag Flowe (vph) 331
otential Capacity (pcph) 941
ovement Capaca.ty (pcph) 941
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 97
tt-e-p--2 LT f rom Maj or Street WB EB
micn-n- licting Flows (vph) 400
otential Capacity (pcph) 1105
tovement Capacity (pcph) 1105
J rob of Queue-Free State 0 96
Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 1700
T Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob
of Queue-Free State 0 95
Step 4 LT from Minor Street NB SB
onf licti.ng Flowe (vph) 609
totential Capacity (pcph) 470
Ma j or LT, Minor TH
LIjusted mpedance Factor 0 95
Impedance Factor 0 95
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movemente 0 95
tovement Capacity (pcph) 447
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg 95%.
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
L 146 447 >
491 11 4 1 7 C 11 4
CB R 30 941 >
L 46 1105 3 4 0 0 A 0 5
Intersection Delay = 2 3 sec/veh
BUILJD OUT YEAit
LEVELS O]F S]ERVI~E
MWHOUT PItOJECT
WITHOUT IW1tOV'EN1EN'rS
~
501ftvur GUf'~~ r*qga) Wrom Tmpgowrw7'S
Mission & Pines Auguc 12, 1997
Lanes, Volumes, and Timings Summary
El ~ ~ ~ H Is w In A ~ W LOJ
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT S8R
Volume (vph ) 199 211 66 136 244 516 30 1008 89 479 1310 227
Adj Lene Grp Vol 0 512 0 0 416 538 31 1199 0 499 1681 0
Lanes 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 2 0
Sabd Flow (Prot) 3585 3662 1583 1770 3681 1770 3647
3atd F'tow (Petm) 3585 3662 1583 1770 3681 1770 3647
Left Tum Type Spln Spld Prot Prot
Phase Number 1 1 6 6 7 4 3 8
Phase Lagging? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cumerrt Spid (s ) 20 20 17 17 11 32 31 52
YellowTime(s) 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
VIC Ratio 0 84 0 81 0 81 0 22 1 12 101 0 84
Platoon Factor 1 00 100 1 00 1 00 1 00 0 95 1 09
Average Delay (s ) 38 38 17 33 94 59 28
Levet of Service D D C D F E D
Cycie Length 100
Offset 69 (59%), Referenoed to phase 2-Unused, Begin af Green
Intetsecdon V!C Rado 98°Yo
Intersection Detay 48 0
IntersecUon LOS E
Splits and Phases Mtsslon & Pines
1 3 4
6 7 We
Queue Lengths, and Potenttal Biocking Problems
A IH !A I
Lane aroup EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Volume 512 416 538 31 1189 499 1681
Queue Length 50% (ft ) 172 140 328 20 416 346 558
Queue Length 95% (ft.) 257 191 495 26 536 421 710
Link Length (fk) 1060 1080 1080 600 600 470 470
°Yo of Ltnk Used 24% 16°/b 46% 40A 89°!0 90% 151 %
Blocks Upstream? Yes
Storage Length (ft)
°!o of storage Used
Fills Storage?
~
Synchro 2 0 Report JWOCUMENT1962151PINEFMBO SY4
InLand Pacific Engmeenng, IPEC page 1
EB Ramps & Pjnes August 12,1997
Lanes, Volumes, and T1mtn8e Summary
El ~ J-4 A ~ A A ~J ~JJ
EBL EBT EBR WBL VYBT iNBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 256 0 1066 0 0 0 0 1571 304 162 1091 0
Adj Lane Grp Vol 690 0 659 0 0 0 0 2009 0 165 1169 0
Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0
Sahi Ftow (Prot.) 1657 1583 3640 1770 3725
Satd Ftaw (Perm ) 1657 1583 3640 1770 3725
Left Tum Type Spld Pemn Pemn Prot
Phase Number 4 4 6 b 2
Phase Lagging? Yes
Cument Split (s ) 39 39 50 11 61
Yellow Time (s ) 40 40 40 40 40
V/C Rado 1 16 1 16 1 17 1 17 0 54
Piatoon Factor 1 00 1 00 0 77 120 010
Average Delay (s ) 117 118 108 175 1
Level of Servioe F F F F A
Cyde Length 100
Oftet 0(0°lo), Referenced to phase 2-SBT, Begin Of Green
Intemecdon V/C Ratio 197%
IntersecUon Delay 86 2
IntersecUon LOS F
Spltts and Phases EB Ramps & Pines
2 ~Q4
5 6
Queue Lengths, and Potentlal Blocking Problems
ED 31 -q 44 11
,
Lane GrouQ EBL EBR NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Volume 690 659 2009 165 1169
Queue Length 50% (1) 479 457 697 114 198
Queue Length 95% (ft) 608 581 855 146 419
Link Length (ft.) 1050 1050 470 760 760
% of Lmk Used 58°/b 550/o 1824/0 19°rb 55%
Btocks Upstream? Yes
Storage Length (ft.)
°rb of storage Used
Fills Storage?
~ .
Synchro 2 0 Report JWOCLTUEN71\962151PIlJEPMBO SY4
Inlaad Pacific Enguieering, IPEC Page 2
WB Ramps & Pines Augnst I2,1997
Lanes, Volumess and Timings Summary
~ ~ ~ W H A A IJ ~J
EBL EBT EBR VNBL WBT WB 't ?18L NBT NBR SAL SBT SBR
Volurtie tvph ) 0 0 0 264 1 21 694 957 0 0 1018 123
Adj Lane Grp Vol 0 0 0 0 308 0 746 1080 0 0 1288 0
Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 Q
Satid Flow (Prot) 1685 1770 3725 3670
Satd Flow (Perm ) 1585 1770 3725 3670
Left Tum Type Perm Split Prot Perm
Phase Number 5 5 8 4 7
Phase Lagging? Yes
Current Spirt (s ) 22 22 42 78 36
Ye1lawTime(s) 40 40 40 40 40
V/C Ratlo 102 108 0 39 106
Platoon Factor 1 00 041 0 37 0 86
Average Delay (s ) 77 62 1 61
Level of Service F F A F
Cycle Length 100
Offset 14 (14%), Referenced to phase 2-Unused, Begin Of Green
Intersection V!C Ratio 106%
IntersecUon Deiay 43 7
Intersecdon LOS E
Splite and Phases WB Ramps & Pines
4 5 e ~7
Queue Lengths, and Potentlal Blocidng Prob[ems
~ W Ffl 41
Lane GrouQ WBT NBL NBT SBT
Lane Group Volume 308 746 1080 1286
Queue Length 50% (ft) 213 518 125 446
Queue l.ength 95% (ft) 334 639 212 572
Llnk Length (1) 1110 760 760 140
% of Link Used 30% 84% 28% 409%
Blocks Upstream? Yes
Storage Length (ft)
% of storage Used
Fills Storage?
Syacbro 2 0 Report J\DOCUIVII;NZ1962151PINEPMBO SY4
Inland Pacific Engmeermg, IPEC Page 3
Indiana & Pines aog,sc 12, 1997
Lanes, Votumss, and Tlmings Summary
El LA ~ A H Is w In A Ud -ij ~jj
EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Volume (vph ) 52 14 332 63 45 115 133 891 21 9 732 22
AdJ Lane Grp Vol 0 423 0 0 258 0 141 1018 0 10 843 0
Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 0
Satd Flow (Prot) 1457 1531 1770 3714 1770 3711
SaW Ftow (Pemn ) 1300 939 313 3714 182 3711
Left Tum Type Penn Perm Perm Pemn
Phase Number 4 4 2 2
Phase Lagging?
Current Sptd (s ) 46 46 54 54
Yellow Time (s ) 40 40 40 40
V/C Rabo 0 76 0 64 0 88 0 54 010 0 45
Platoon Facbor 1 00 1 00 0 49 0 42 100 1 00
Average Delay (s ) 22 19 35 6 10 12
Level of Servtoe C C D B B B
Cycle Length 100
Offset 63 (63%), Referenoed bo phase 2-NB-SB, Begin Of Green
Intersection V/C Ratio 83%
Intersecbon Delay 131
Inbersection LOS B
Spiks and Phases Indlana & Ptnes
112 U 4
Queue Lengths, and Potential Biocking Problems
~ H "I Ti L4 'ji
Lane GrouQ EBT WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Votume 423 258 141 1018 10 843
Queue Length 50% (ft.) 247 140 79 183 3 185
Queue length 950/o (R) 435 289 127 285 4 278
Link Length (ft,) 1050 1110 140 140 1250 1250
4+6 of Link Used 41 % 26% 91 % 2040/o 0% 22%
Biocks Upstream? Yes
Storage Length (ft)
% of storage Used
Fills Storage?
_ _
Syacbro 2 0 Report J 1D0CUMEN7\962151PINEPMB0 SY4
Inland Pacific Engineermg, IPEC Page 4
iHCS Uneignalized Intersections Releaee 2 ic PINOBOPM HCO Page i
Center For Microcomputers In Tranaportation
University of Florida
12 Weil Hall
Laineoville, FL 32611-2083
Ph (904) 392-0378
J;treets (N-S) Pines Road (E-W) Nora Road
Major Street Direction NS
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (mi.n)
lAnalyst Tim Schwab
Date of Analyeie 8/12/97
Other Information Buildout without Project, Without Impro
vemente
lTwo-way Stop-controlled Intersection
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
No Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumea 1729 7 34
PHF 96 96 96
Grade 0 0
MC's M
SU/RV' s ( ~ y
CV's M
PCE's 1 10
Adjuatment Factore
iVehicle Critical Follow-up
Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Lef t Turn Major Road 5 50 2 10
lRight Turn Minor Road 5 50 2 60
Through Traffic Minor Road 6 50 3 30
Left Turn Minor Road 7 00 3 40
CS Uneignalized Intersections Release 2 ic PINOBOPM HCO Page 2
Worksheet for SV3C Intereection
tep 1 RT from Minor Street WB EB
onflicting Flows (vph) 904
otential Capacity (pcph) 482
ovement Capacity (pcph) 482
rob of Queue-Free State 0 92
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
(pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (aec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
1-4ovement
8 1
R 39 482 8 1 0 2 B
Intersection Delay = 0 2 eec/veh
HCS Unsignalized Interaections Release 2 ic MIMCBOPM HCO Page 1
enter For Microcomputers In Traneportataoa
niveraity of Florida
512 Weil Hall
ainesville, FL 32611-2083
th (904) 392-0378
treete (N-S) McDonald Road ($-W) Mission Avenue
ajor Street Direction EW
(ength of Time Analyzed 15 (min)
Analyst Tim Schwab
ate of Analyeie 8/12/97
tther Information Buildout without project, Without Impro
vements
o-way Stop-controlled Intersection
$astbound Weatbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
L Lanes 0 2 < 0 0 > 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Stop/Yield N N
olumea 569 230 99 393 185 97
1;HF 87 87 87 87 67 87
Grade 0 0 0
CU (t)
/RV~ e (t)
'
B (s)
PCE's 1 10 1 10 1 10
Adjuetment Factors
fehicle Critical Follow-up
aneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf)
Lef t Turn Major Road 5 50 2 10
ight Turn M3mor Road 5 50 2 60
through Traf f ic Niinor Road 6 50 3 30
Lef t Turn Minor Road 7 00 3 40
'
CS Unsignalized Interaectione Release 2 ic MIMGBOPM HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TW3C Intersectlon
1;_____inor -------------------------tep 1 RT f rom M3treet NB SB
onf licting Flowe (vph) 459
otential Capacity (pcph) S11
ovement Capacity (pcph) 811
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 85
tep 2 LT from Major Street WB EB
onflicting Flowe (vph) 918
otential Capacity (pcph) 551
pmovement Capacity (pcph) 551
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 77
Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 3400
T Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl)
Major LT Shared Lane Prob
of Queue-Free State 0 74
Step 4 LT from Minor 3treet NB SB
i--------------------------------------------------------
Conflicting Flows (vph) 1352
Potential Capacity (pcph) 145
Ma] or LT, Minor TH
mpedance Factor 0 74
1Ad3usted Impedance Factor 0 74
Capacity AdjuBtment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 74
&ovement Capacity (pcph) 107
Interaection Performance Summary
Avg 95%
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (Bec/veh)
INB L 234 107 623 9 17 8 F
411 1
INB R 122 811 5 2 0 6 B
WB L 125 551 S 4 0 9 B 1 7
Intersection Delay = 74 2 sec/veh
HCS Uneignalized Intersectione Release 2 lc MIMABOPM HCO Page 1
- = = = = = - - = - = = = = ~ = = aao = _ = = = c ~ a = a.= = = = = = = = = = = ~ = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
enter For Microcomputers In Transportation
nivereity of Florida
512 Weil Hall
ainesville, FL 32611-2083
h (904) 392-0378
======_==_="_==~==aCOa~a~=a=====-=---===----=--=-=-====______=__=_==__~
treets (N-S) Mamer Road (E-W) Mission Avenue
ff4a3or Street Direction EW
Length of Time Analyzed 15 (min)
alyst Tim Schwab
Date of Analysie 8/12/97
ther Information Buildout without project, Without Impro
vements
Two-way Stop-controlled Intereection
Eastbound Weatbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
L Lanes 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 0 0 > 1 < 1
Stop/Yield N N
Volumes 12 448 4 2 384 14 8 4 1 12 4 22
IPHF 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96
Grade 0 0 0 4
MC's M
ISU/RV,'s ( ~ )
CV's M)
PCE' e 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 10 1 70 1 70 1 70
l
Adjuatment Factors
Vehicle Critical Follow-up
iManeuver Gap (tg) Time (tf )
Left Turn Major Road 5 00 2 10
Right Turn Minor Road 5 50 2 60
lThrough Traffic Minor Road 6 00 3 30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 50 3 40
CS Uneignalized Interaections Release 2 la MIMABOPM HCO Page 2
Worksheet for TWSC IntersectZOn
RT from Minor Street NB 38
Lt-e-p--1-
oaflicting F1owa (vph) 469 408
otential Capacity (pcph) 801 860
ovement Capacity (pcph) 801 860
Prob of Queue-Free 5tate 1 00 0 95
Step 2 LT from Major Street WB EB
Conflicting Flows (vph) 471 415
otential Capacity (pcph) 1022 1087
Movement Capacity (pcph) 1022 1087
rob of Queue-Free State 1 00 0 99
Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 1700 1700
T Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 1700 1700
Major LT Shared Lane Prob
of Queue-Free State 1 00 0 98
Step 3 TH from Minor Street NB SB
iConflicting-Flows--(vph) 899 894
Potential Capacity (pcph) 368 370
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movements 0 98 0 98
lMovement Capacity (pcph) 361 362
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 99 0 98
iStep-4--LT-from-Minor-Street NB SB
Co
nflicting Flows (vph) 905 894
kPaj otential Capacity (pcph) 317 321
or r LT, Minor TH
Impedance Factor 0 96 0 97
justed Impedance Factor 0 97 0 98
UCapacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impeding Movementa 0 93 0 97
Movement Capacity (pcph) 294 313
CS Unsignalized Intersections Releaee 2 ic MIMABOPM HCO Page 3
Intereection Per€ormance Summary
Avg 95W
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay 'Length LOS Delay
' ovement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) ( sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
NB I, 9 2 94 >
T 4 361 > 326 11 5 0 0 C 11 5
R 1 801 >
F B L 22 313 >
B T 7 362 > 544 8 3 0 5 B 8 3
SB R 39 860 >
B L 14 1087 3 4 0 0 A 0 1
L 2 1022 3 5 0 0 A 0 0
Intersection Delay = 0 6 sec/veh
~
I
kCS Unsignalized Interaections Release 2 ic MIEV80PM HCO Page i
enter For Mi.crocomputers In Tranaportation
niver8ity of Florida
512 Weil Hall
ainesville, FL 32611-2083
h (904) 392-0378
treets (N-S) Evergreen Road (E-W) Miseion Avenue
(ajor Street Direction EW
ength of Time Analyzed 15 (min)
Analyst Tim 3chwab
ate of Analysis 8/12/97
ltther Information Buildout without Project, without Impro
vementa
o-way Stop-controlled Interaection
Eastbound Weatbound Northbound Southbound
L T R L T R L T R L T R
L Lanea 0 1 < 0 0 > 1 0 0 > 0 < 0 0 0 0
Stop/Yield N N
olumea 304 162 43 265 150 27
PHF 95 95 95 95 95 95
Grade 0 0 0
C's
sU/RV' s ( ~ )
CV's M)
PCE's 1 10 1 10 1 10
Adjuetment Factors
fMehicle Critical Follow-up
aneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf )
Left Turn Majar Road 5 00 2 10
ight Turn Minor Road 5 50 2 60
ough Traffic Minor Road 6 00 3 30
Left Turn Minor Road 6 50 3 40
HCS IInsignalized Intersections Release 2 ic MIEVBOPM HCO Page 2
Workaheet for TWSC Intersection
ttep-l--RT-from-Minor-Street NB SB
onflicting Flows (vph) 406
otential Capacity (pcph) 862
ovement Capacity (pcph) 862
Prob of Queue-Free State 0 96
ttep-2--LT-from-Major-Street WB EB
onflicting Flowe (vph) 491
otential Capacity (pcph) 1000
ovement Capacity (pcph) 1000
rob o€ Queue-Free State 0 95
Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl) 1700
iT Saturation Flow Rate (pcphpl)
Ma3or LT Shared Lane Prob
of Queue-Free State 0 94
Step 4 LT from Minor Street NB SB
onflicting Flows (vph) 730
otential l Capacity (pcph) 400
Major LT, Minor TH
mpedance Factor 0 94
UI justed Impedance Factor 0 94
Capacity Adjustment Factor
due to Impecling Movements 0 94
Fovement Capacity (pcph) 376
Intersection Performance Summary
Avg 95k
Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach
Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay
Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (aec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh)
L 174 376 >
411 17 2 2 7 C 17 2
NB R 31 862 >
L L 50 1000 3 8 0 0 A 0 5
Interaection Delay = 3 4 sec/veh
i
BUILD OUT YEAR
LEVELS OF SEYtVICE
WITHOtJT PROJECT
IW1tOVEMENTS