Loading...
2001, 02-13 CUE-06-01 Conditional Use Permit s • i S P O K A N E " "-�° �{ � � > C O U N T Y DIVISION OF PLANNING A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MICHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIRECTOR GARY OBERG, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Transportation Engineering, Scott Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball Spokane County Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Division of Building& Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 Central Valley School District No. 356 Vera Irrigation District No. 15 FROM: Deana Walter, Associate Planne v DATE: February 13, 2001 SUBJECT: CUE-06-01; Conditional Use Permit for a Home Industry Attached you will find a copy of the application submitted by Dan and Crystal Clark for a Conditional Use Permit for a home industry to operate a lawn and tree spraying business. Please forward your review comments to me by February 27, 2001 If you have any questions please contact me at 477-7200. NOTE: The Division of Planning is now circulating comments for SEPA Checklist. This will be the only time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA Checklist for this project. we Attachments: Application, vicinity map, site plan, Environmental Checklist Copy w/o Attachments: Dan & Crystal Clark, 14823 E. 14th Avenue, Veradale, WA. 99037 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220 PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509)477-2243 • TDD: (509)477-7133 CII 0b 0 l .. l APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS frni CUP'S, VARIANCES, NON-CONFORMINS USES AiRECEIVED DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANakYaKANE COUNTY SPOKANE COUNTY FEB 0 6 2001 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATIONf t , DIVISION OF PLANNING • Property Owner(s): v\ ___(_4,_-___2„...,__'(__,1 �.A 3 t C_ l/, ` '1"�. Street Address: i Li 9 1_7--, ) q . AV Ir _ City: V V v' a � a \ L State: Ill)A Zip Code: 1 a` Phone: (Home) ofa,-9 - 2 4A(Work) - 5 677 b Fax: 1L . J- 7I APPLICANT/AGENT INFORMATION • Applicant/Agent: S fl Vin GC. DV C - Street Address: City: State: _ Zip Code: Phone: (Home) (Work) Fax: REQUESTED ACTIONS(S) (Indicate appropriate action): tit Conditional Use Permit ❑ Expansion of a Nonconforming Use 0 Variance(s) ❑ Other (list): PROJECT INFORMATION • Existing use of property: Ut i< . • Describe proposed use of the property, noting change from 'existing use': - • 1 ., I A • ,. `€ • If a variance application, state the Code standard and describe the variance soucht in comparable terms (i.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet): _1(\ 1 A • If a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards? 0 N If not, has one or more variances been requested: Y N • If home industry, has consultation occurred with the Division of Building and Planning regarding construction of building for intended use? Y N ) APPUCATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS PAGE 2 of 3 CUP VarianCe Non-conformin• Uses • Size of the subject property Parcel No.(s): t L L -jk.7 • Street address of property (if known): A (. • Legal description of pro•erty (includ- easement, if applicable): e �,+ C • Source of legal:G-{ P c lc.A. 4- i ,,-}a.�L o. '' a i CQ ; , ``� �'f` `'`-`- �'F i. k In& i - � � '� k� • Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner, and/or sponsor f j P agent: • What interest does applicant hold in the property NOTARY — _--- State of Washington) SS County of Spokane ) I swear, under penalty of perjury, that: (1) I am the owner of record or authorized the proposed site; (2) if not the owner, written permission from owner authorizing on his/her behalf is attached; and (3) all of the above responses and thosesupporting agent for documents are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. on my actions WANDA T. CLARK Signed: _A,4. . ' r �1 NOTARY PUBLIC / gate_ pt b _D I STATE OF WASHINGTON I EXPIRES IANUARY 6 �i .2003 Not Public in and for the Sate of Washington, residing at &Q`lo My appointment expires_O 26[_ ciKk BURDEN OF PROOF FORMS (by applicant) It is necessary for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons requested action should be approved and to literallywhy theo approving the application. Accordingly, put forth the basic argument in favor of requested action (variance, conditional use, etc.) ed to ve been given a form for your way which addresses the criteria which the Hearing Examiner must conp you sider. es case in a complete the form and return with your application. Please FOR STAFF US %/LY Section `/J Township Range11' Lot, legal & addl. ownership eck-d by: 9 Violation/Enforcement: N Person doing Area Y >ry� ��� Other/previous Division of Building and Planning actions involving this property: Certificate of Exemption No. Hearing Date Application No. , Various site plan dimensions check by APPUCATIONS FOR PUBUC HEARING ITEMS PAGE 3 of 3 CUP.Variance Non-conforming Uses SIGN-OFF BY AGENCIES The applicant must visit each agency whose number is circled below. 1. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT a. Proposed method of water supply p ;c i' • b. Proposed method of sewage disposal 7v 4/rc ‘,,ft---- A ,,s4 '_A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements d standards. We reque t consultation with the Division of Buildin & Planning: Y N Gr- •--- ` / t Z 4- a / Sig ure / Da 2. WATER PURVEYOR: G1aA tiJA i t>Z IT Po uV 4-Q . — a. Proposed method of water supply flonssr.c Sysrc.y b. The proposal is/ located within the boundary of our future service area. c. The proposal isAkorist,located within the boundary of our current district. d. We are/absprret able to serve this site with adequate water. e. Satisfactory arran�gem�ents ave/been made to serve this proposal. Sig - ure Date 3. SEWAGE DISPOSA ' . -VEYOR: a. Proposed method of water s ., ► b. Proposed •- -.s of sewage disposal A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the propos. . - -s'licant has been informed of requirements and standards. • Signature Date _tea 4. FIRE DISTRICT/ FIRE MARSHALL a. Proposed is within Fire Protection District# 4— b. Adequate arrangement h vg/haeme•astbeen made to meet our needs in providing for an adequate water system and facilities for fire protection purposes c. Recommended fire flow: ; or unable to calculate now because use is not definitive and will be determined at building permit application time. d. Requirements include: p/ACORD E KT Eeot2 /F €AT,' T r-/c-05 AigE 57'o /ivS/AE, GoPY OF CZir i MATER/4-cs u5T Ta gE PRo vaoh ft'TYPES of e-ff f /C4t5 APE iitA)R77981..E, l� �m ., A /A/SE //aG o/ Sig ature Fire District# Date App for Public Hearing Items-Iq-70.98 - RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY FEB 0 6 2001 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FORM - DIVISION OF PLANNING Name: �' q- _ - 01. 1� Y File: CONDITIONAL USES State Law, Section 36.70.020(7), clarifies that the County regulations must specify the standards and criteria that shall be applied in the review by the Hearing Examiner. Condition(s) of approval may also be added to assure compatibility with other uses in the same zone. A. Assuming the proposal is listed as a"permitted"conditional use, do you believe the proposal meets all of the required, established and applicable standards? U 6..c., B. If you cannot meet the conditional uses required standards, are you seeking relief by applying for an administrative exception or a variance? Yes No _X_ C. What have you done or could you do to: 1. Make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity or zone? • \\ 1O VIS., E.-SS 't IRs' . ,: . t"?" ‹'I . IA•)E S.E,,:f VI L. 2. Ensure against imposing excessive demanas upon public utilities? A.) A D. Explain how or why the proposal will not be detrimental to: 1. The Comprehensive Plan: k �- V A P .. k II ♦ kb- A r •` ; and 2. Surrounding property: A ) Y E. What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent(health, safety and general welfare)of the Zoning Code AND mitigate any adverse effect upon the neighboring properties—including but not limited to: 1)time limits;2) front,side or rear yard greater than minimum stated; 3) suitabl- landscaping;4)signing; 5)off-street parking; and 6) others? i' - • O . i . . r .. ► .Yf: A 0 &AL A A I LA r a r--) vc k-_t'. t,wt E.+D • r w A. Lr ' ' / ! • V.E.-SS <`% / v , r . % . �r , C � :i ► �. _v�� . \ IL I a .. • • • ► . • i - t r • • CUP BURDEN OF PROOF REV.2-99 CUE 06- 0 1 CUE -06-01 Vicinity Map Scale : 1 inch - 1667 ft (rounded) 02/07/01 Vicinity Map 4, : • • • • • wBroadway w Blake /ementary g1 46 Springfield 1 I Allo • s -Springfield Alki Frogres Elementary I I J o Q �� ° Valleyw ty I �, -§ x d Vall E, rve Valleyway `u r, ° v) Nixon. x > Nixo _Nixon J u .', a GA, Nixgg = ci 3i c di tin Mai via 1g i ---".s �_Mait>` El— ' Riverside etside o .:4 U • ' w jj 1 Riverside_ S racue �� > Sptayes_ --1111 pvt. 5 14th pvt. 2 71_u y o Spi1Ce pvt. 4th 8 aInd 3rd__..._..._._.. c �d.celmrd —5 C1 Y' Pa 13 F Uf Q. W to 0u1 1 • 5th r > 3 iiiil �- 3..5th 5ihp 6d, T ey Senior High ,1lth T o`�; 1'r 0,,ri,!'r r .V.._......9' y�iiiiii�iiiiiniiiili �' 1111 141tlt: : 1 ,. I P 1'"'DI 5 tidr./hrOL ce J,t ' 9th pvt , ° y� 5th ao • ' Crystal pvt. io Z • 1 Aith 7th JIr < Q > • ntary 8th o 8th W : t ° �. ' (�rl U 9th ., A7 ' hi _ r`nt„ 9th I 9th i' _.. U si r C astral Va °•_ r t 12I1__ 4 48 .0 c ..g,p� 13th � , 13th 1 A�� 3 " 2 2ct ❑ 913th 13th t 14th �y 14th Qa r 17th A aj 16t s% 3 .1,••. 15th ° ,o. W Ili > $'151h pvtY L g t, V6 pvt li. 3 2�4 `- Req 26th o 5 22nd �c c a 18th 17 t V to . to •mss / A t Cpy[� ?kr 22nd1 A 22nd 'rid 23rd 23po rid '. __23rd 731ri 74th 23rd 24t41.11.—. tA •5 �C 1 , r r `. S 25th �' -; E/eme A .. Iv Il . c 2 �'a�e 6er ane r°n S ,p ecttt"`^tPvt . J��e to 32nd 3 u �' tary 26th .. �. - 2% 27th E o SyT— \. M 1, c R e 'S‘!.t > 29th_, iOth— m g„g D = 4. ai Z ,36th e ,;, "I l d 3 "' _ o _ ` Q 32nd p, (/m((er (£ Oy n 32nd 36 34` F ' ,T1a Rec� 3., 36th v. ,i Scale : 1 inch - 1667 ft (rounded) 02/07/01 Vicinity Map io h i� i w(A)a;,,v 1 Lim"-L CoVERtQ . ,, rt 40 7 // 2 x 8 OiV 14 ,/4 / W + E4 751-. /?°r,!POCK,S7S / //6)4 1:ZI Cr/ 026 ) // / /' J V //j/,// / // ./ ^-' ) fb:%***4644 . . Ks' + —80 saBi LOCVEO GgENEt... I 101' J i 1 3z W _ a z o c E 3 ri G z •� > 0 "sem 401 -r - Lu uu _.,cc, 0 IS "9 tic w 0 I 0 iii a.—100/....._ wQ 14- 4 (o6' a1 Game . d.. ' ; / / if • , O&'v; / . r7 ,AT )f,0// '' . <E- Zoe -> E-� �. tit / / � / F1 1 '�. .. ..1 /004Lai WAS 77) I $CALE LIgn E. 1LITli 115/ Oi .lE.wAi YlINCH 1 i0 veR.A °Ail., WA. SITE PLAN - aa' OF RECORD , •• RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY FEB 0 6 2001 DIVISION OF PLANNING CUE ... Q : . 01 ENV][RON M]EN TA\JL (C JH[JE(CKJLJ[ST SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11 . 10 . 230111 • SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1) PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts or your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PRO jECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." N ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 2 01-'1 A. BACKGROUND FIT F/PROJECT No. 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: A 2. Name of applicant: ♦ \ 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: 1 . 411 A 91 Lt 4. Date checklist prepared: i S. Agency requesting checklist: J r 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 1 \ IA Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 3 o;2I A. BACKGROUND (continued): 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. \^ 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. rjA 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. \ % Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21 A. BACKGROUND (continued): 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. C)tA. & r Ian - 1 % gp , .. _ _ A i A. i. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,township and range,if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map,if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. n2,___?t&L_I LI Ve.,..kraa6( CI CI 7 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). 1 - R ( tq � • C 1 r • _ • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): fla rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils,specify them and note any prime farmland. s � S •' d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, debe. e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 6 of 2l Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL El FMENTS (Continued): g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project const gon (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Prop std measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: • 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial,wood smoke) during construction and when the project is eted? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities,if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If generally describe. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 7 o`3I Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe typeaniprovide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the escrbg waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indic1tahe source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general descIipon, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site pY ` .I ,A Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 8 of 21 Evaluation For 'Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. V\ C7 b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give geAeral description,purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility.Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the num er4 persons the system(s) are expected to serve. 3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of(including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting ac ie Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 9 of 21 Evaluation For . Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL FT FMENTS (Continued): • • 4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be\ sst re ? n1 � _____._._._________ 5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes meas res to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? t II # ♦ Y' _ 1s. •� . . _ Or E... rowel". �t 4al , , L, , 1 `^f.:.� dtA,4!rv,1 c. Water Runoff(including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff('including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this watef w into other waters? If so,describe. _______________ 2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal system disc ming to surface or groundwater? 3) Cnud waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 11 A Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 10 0;2 Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ET FMENTS (Continued): d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts,if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). 4. PLANTS a. Check " circle types of vegetation found on the site: •/ deciduous tree: alder, a aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar,pine, other fhrubs ‘../.'grass pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass,milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? c. List t reatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other mea ures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 11 of 21 • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: A mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: A rG fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: A r� b. List y threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Y\ D d. Propose measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. L � b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. ` \ Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of->1 Evaluation.For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts,if any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this pro.osal? If so, de cribe. +C I. - c • 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental healthazards, if any: Y\ A b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? YN. 0 — 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. r\ rhE Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 13 of 21 • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. hat is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. 0 c. Describe any structures on the site. iA. A • / I i C A. 4' # a _ • d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? E�1 e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 14 of")1 • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL FT FMENTS (Continued): f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area) If so, specify. \N. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? 4 �- i �' • _ �• ' • s' wk.° E S -+- vv. V `e1 I T A 1 c' iii r j. poximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Prop seri measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: L1 n.U. E...c� . e A C) 4 A c A - • E (� ?�� ] . Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 15 o /1 Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, lOW-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Prop sed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 1"1 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. Wh t views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? c. Pro osed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 16 of 21 • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly, occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views c. What e4ting off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Prop se measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: 12. RECREATION a. Wha designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? b. Wou d the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Y {1 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 17 of/1 • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation oppoctunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,state, or local pr servation registers, known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 0 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street sy tem. Show on ite plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit • •.? 3 •• • Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 1 S of?l • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project e minate? Y` 1 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or priyate). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? I known, ind'cate when .eak volumes would occur. 1114 .. j_ . — 1 .r • Q 'v\ r . yri Q:-(D, I ,y; , -filo-1� l • i\A, \A • . .. f r. �7 J- `• � ��„� • . `Y? ,�. . \rte t;.4" 4. e'" g. Pro Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: Ts& 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: firre1proection, police protection, health care,schools, other)? If so, generally describe. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 19 o`2 i • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): b. Propos d Aasures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities rrently av ' ble at the site: ec tacit natural gas, ater refuse t lephone s 'tary se r,septic system,other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses aremade truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that,should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, thea encu may withdraw any determination of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Date: ' - 1.5- QCA.A.,\(1.tc.Q jAlt Proponent: , I r � Proponent: (Please •-pe or print) (Signature) Address: f ) y A 0 E._ City, State, Zip: Lr. 1l • `• (1R0 n p Phone: Person completing the form: S a� c 67-VE Date: Phone: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Pate 20 of 2l FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff ivlember(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance (DNS). B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions (iMIDNS). C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance (DS). REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILNG FEE Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 21 of 2I SUN SERVICES WEED, PEST & SPRAY, INC. DAN CLARK, OWNER/MANAGER 14823 EAST 14TH AVENUE, VERADALE, WA 99037, (509) 928-5670 Attachment to question 7 page 13 of Environmental Checklist 7(a) All work is done with Category III &IV pesticides, which of the four categories are the least toxic and the most safe to work with and apply. Health hazards,toxic exposer, risk of fire and explosion are virtually nonexistent. Spill procedures are in place, and in 21 years of business, I have never had one single occurrence of a pesticide spill. Concerning this proposal, hazardous waste is nonapplicable. 7(1) Since 1991,this company has remained very small with myself being the only pesticide applicator. Pesticides are purchased in very small quantities on an as-needed basis. No bulk pesticides are required,therefore reducing risk. Nothing other than normally provided community services should be needed.