The URL can be used to link to this page

34573 CONSTRUCTION REPORTS J I ; I • i~ . i ~ G.''~ v J~J' ~ NJ Gp►:..c,.~ ~ a s ~Z-- ~i~ v ~ ~ - - - - 3- y-=~ , ~ %:'p - z - 3 ~ , ' O ~f ~tr►'~ i~~Z._.~~(✓'~j~,~.•~li~ - - 7 W , i, 43 &-tu pctk _ ~ ~ c~ n_--- M ~I I I II ' _ ~ i ----1-~ - - - ' - . ~I il - - ~i - ~k-~- - - - - ~ - - _ _ ° ~I . ~ - - = - ---3 - ~ h I~ . ~ `~I - - - - i„u ~ ~ -Week1y Constmctlan Activity Rei3ort Long Road Interceptor Utility Reference Na. 19551 19552 pD) ~ C [E y WE R,eport Number 4 T_ Augvst 13 -19, 2003 AUG 2 1 2003 D ''o: Billy Urhausen, Spokane County, r]ivision of TJtilities - - a Sandra Raskell, City of Spokane Valley wnnHK Rich Dahrn, Dahm Development, Inc. Tim Hurley, Murghy Brathers, Inc. From: Sandra Axithony, P.E., Tay1or Engineering, Inc%V~, Date: August 20, 2003 1. Constructiua Frogress to Date a Wednesday, August 13, 2003, asphalt subcontractor (Inland Asphalt) placed and cornpac#ed the asphalt on i,ong Road, A11 carnpactian tests passed using the Rice obtained from a~'ield sample (154.2 pcf), • TayIor Engineering, Inc, submi#ted the Inspectian Request Farm for past-paving TV testing of the sewer lines. The form was faxed to the Spokane Caunty Utilities Division affice. 2. Special Circunistances ar Uuforeseen Frvblems • Existing water line running parallel to the sewer main was found much closer to the ~ewer line than ma.rked in fhe field. Adjustments haile beer made to the design by Stan Stirlar_g (Taylor Engineering, Inc.) to keep as much cleaxance fram the water li-ne as possible. In-feld alterations were dxscussed with Spakane County Utilities I]ivision {ICevin Caoke}. C6solidated Irrigation District is also sware of #he changes in design and the close proxlrni#y to their water main. 3, Overall Project Status Sanitary Sewer System: 'Approximately 656-feet af 18" gravity sewer pipe between exxsting manhole 414 and . manho~e 21 and manhole 22 and existing manhale 24. « New rnanhole 421 [17915.OSI at STA. 8+71.42, nevv rnanhole #22 [17916.25] at STA. 4+~6.28 and new manhole #23 [17916.9S] at STA. 2+49.86 • ApFroxirriately 446-feet of 2 1 " gravity sewer pipe from manlzole 421 t❑ manhole #22. itic. Page 1 CH Design and Land P1atlning 106 w. Mission Ave, • spakarie, uvA 99201-2345 • (509) 32s-3371 FA?( (509) 328-8224 f E-MAIL teiPtaylorengr.com - ~ • Air tests and mandrel tests passed between manhole #14 and #21, between manhole #21 and 922, between manhole #22 and #23, and between manhole #23 and #24. • Utility trench backfill and compaction is complete and all tests passed. • Pre-paving TV inspection of the sanitary sewer system passed. Spokane County gave the OK to pave. Roadway: • Contractor graded Long Road to subgrade elevation. Compaction tests were approved. • Contractor placed and compacted the crushed surfacing top course material in two 3" lifts. Compaction tests were completed and approved. Laboratory Results: • A laboratory proctor was obtained on a native material sample taken to Budinger & Associates, Inc. The proctor resulted in a maximum density (corrected) of 141.8 pounds per cubic feet with an optimum moisture (corrected) of 5.2%. 4. Schedule: • Contractor is awaiting the results of the Post-Paving TV inspection of the sewer lines. END OF REPORT Note to Recipient: If you believe there is an error in any part of the above information, please contact Taylor Engineering, Inc. immediately. SAA/02-042Q/Construction Status4/082003 'IAylor Engineering, Inc. Page 2 civil Desig, and l..ana Plann;ng 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 / E-MAIL tei@taylorengr.com ' . } Weekly Construction Activity Report - Long Road Interceptor Utility Reference No. 19551 & 19552 Report Number 3 July 31- August 11, 2003 To: Billy Urhausen, Spokane County, Division of Utilities Sandra Raskell, City of Spokane Valley Rich Dahm, Dahm Development, Inc. Tim Hurley, Murphy Brothers, Inc. From: Sandra Anthony, P.E., Taylor Engineering, Inc. %k ' Date: August 13, 2003 1. Construction Progress to Date • Pre-paving TV inspection of the sanitary sewer system is complete and Spokane County gave the OK to pave. • Contractor has graded Long Road to subgrade elevation. Compaction has been tested and approved. • Contractor has placed and compacted the crushed surfacing top course material in two 3" lifts. Compaction tests were completed and approved. 2. Special Circumstances or Unforeseen Problems • Existing water line running parallel to the sewer main was found much closer to the sewer line than marked in the fieid. Acijustments have been made to the design by Stan Stirling (Taylor Engineering, Inc.) to keep as much clearance from the water line as possible. In-field alterations were discussed with Spokane County Utilities Division (Kevin Cooke). Consolidated Irrigation District is also aware of the changes in design and the close proximity to their water main. 3. Overall Project Status Sanitary Sewer System: • Approximately 656-feet of 18" gravity sewer pipe between existing manhole #14 and manhole 21 and manhole 22 and existing manhole 24. • New manhole #21 [179/5.OS] at STA. 8+71.42, new manhole #22 [179/6.2S] at STA. 4+26.28 and new manhole #23 [179/6.95] at STA. 2+49.86 Taylor Engineering, InC. Page 1 Civil Design and t..and Planning 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 / E-MAIL tei@taylorengr.com . ~ _ ' ~ . 0 Approximately 446-feet of 21" gravity sewer pipe from manhole #21 to manhole 422. • Air tests and mandrel tests passed between manhole #14 and #21, between manhole #21 and #22, between manhole #22 and #23, and between manhole #23 and #24. • Utility trench backfill and compaction is complete and all tests passed. Roadway: • None. Laboratory Results: • A laboratory proctor was obtained on a native material sample taken to Budinger & Associates, Inc. The proctor resulted in a maximum density (corrected) of 141.8 pounds per cubic feet with an oPtimum moisture (con.rected) of 5.2%. 4. Schedule: • Contractor is scheduled to pave on Wednesday, August 13, 2003. END OF REPORT Note to Recipient: If you believe there is an error in any part of the above information, please contact Taylor Engineering, Inc. immediately. SAA/02-042Q/ConswctionStatus3/081303 Tbylor Engineering, Inc• Page 2 Civil Design and L.and Planning 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 / E-MAIL tei@taylorengr.com , ~ . - Weekly Constructxon Activity Report Long Road Interceptor Utility Reference No. 19551 & 19552 Report Number 2 ~ July 8 - July 14, 2003 To: BillY Urhausen, SPokane CountY, Division of Ufiilities D . - ~ Sandra Raskell, City of Spokane Valley ]IOD~)~ Rich Dahm, Dahm Development, Inc. Tim Hurley, Murphy Bzothers, Inc. From: Sandra Anthony, P.E., Taylor Engineering, Ync. ~ . Date: July 22, 2003 1. Construction Progress to Date - • Contractor installed approximately 410-feet of 18" gravity sewer pipe between manhole #22 . and existing manhole #24. • Contxactor installed new manhole #22 [179/6.2S] at STA. 4+26.28 and new manhole #23 [179/6.95] at STA. 2+49.86. • Contractor installed approximately 254-feet of 21" gravity sewer pipe from STA. 6+80 to manhole #22. • Utility trench backfill and compaction has been completed. All compaction tests have passed. • Air tests have passed between manhole #14 and #21, between manhole #21 and #22, between , manhole #22 and #23, and behween manhole #23 and #24. 0 7~►e conic-actuY flasti~:u a~id i-~a~~drcI ~es~eu ►h~ s~w~r lines. ~~~l tes~s pas~ed. • Taylor Engineering, Inc. will submit the InspECtion Request Fonn for pre-paving TV testing of the sewer lines fioday. The form will be faxed to the Spokane County Utilities Division : office under separate cover. 2. Special Circumstances or Unforeseen Problems - • Existing water line running parallel to the sewer main was found much closer to the sewer line than marked in the field. Adjushnents have been made to the design by Stan Stirling. (Taylor Engineering, Inc.) to keep as much clearance from the water line as possible. In-field alterations were discussed with Spokane County Utilities Division (Kevin Cooke). . Consolidated Irrigation District is also aware of the changes in design and the close proximity to their water main. ,'I~aylor Engineering, Inc. - Civil Design and Land Planning Page 1 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 / E-MAIL tei@taytorengr.com . ` . 3. Overall Project Status Sanitary Sewer System: • Approximately 246-feet of 18" gravity sewer pipe between existing manhole #14 and manhole #21. • New manhole #21 [179/5.OS] at STA. 8+71.42. e Approximately 192-feet of 21" gravity sewer pipe from manhole #21 to STA. 6+80. Roadway: • None. lGaborato►_-y Results: • A laboratory, proctor was obtained on a native material sample taken to Budinger & Associates, Ync. The proctor resulted in a maximum density (corrected) of 141.8 pounds per cubic feet with an optimum moisture (corrected) of 5.2%. 4. Schedule: e After the TV inspection is complete and Spokane County gives the OK to pave, the contractor will work to put the road section back. END OF REPORT Note to Recinient: If you believe there is an error in any part of the above information, please contact Taylor Engineering, Inc. iminediately. SAA/02-042Q/Con structionStatus2/072203 racylor Engineering, Inc. Pa z : Civil Desigi and l.and Planning ge 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 / E-MAIL tei@taylorengr.com ~ ° - •~t•, VVeekly Construction Activitv Report Long Road Interceptor Utility Reference No. 19551 & 19552 Report Number 1 June 30 - July 7, 2003 To: Billy Urhausen, Spokane County, Division of Utilities Sandra Raskell, City of Spokane Valley Rich Dahm, Dahm Development, Inc. Tim Hurley, Murphy Brothers, Inc. From: Sandra Anthony, P.E., Taylor Engineering, Inc. ~ Date: July 8, 2003 1. Construction Progress to Date • Contractor installed approximately 246-feet of 18" gravity sewer pipe between existing manhole # 14 and manhole 421. • Contractor installed new manhole #21 [179/5.OS] at STA. 8+71.42. . • Contractor installed approximately 192-feet of 21" gravity sewer pipe from manhole 421 to STA. 6+80. • A laboratory proctor was obtained on a native material sample taken to Budinger & Associates, Tnc. The proctor resulted in a maximum density (conected) of 141.8 pounds per cubic feet with an optimum moisture (corrected) of 5.2%. 2. Special Circumstances or Unforeseen Problems • Existing water line running parallel to the sewer main was found much closer to the sewer line than marked in the field. Adjustments have been made to the design by Stan Stirling (Taylor Engineering, Inc.) to keep as much clearance from the water line as possible. In-field alterations were discussed with Spokane County Utilities Division (Kevin Cooke). Consolidated Irrigation District is also aware of the changes in design and the close proximity to their water main. 3. Overall Project Status Sanitary Sewer System: • As indicated in item 1, above. Roadway: • None. Wor Engineering, Inc. Page 1 Civil Design and Land Planning 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 / E-MAIL tei@taylorengr.com f . ; Laboratory Results: • As indicated in item 1, above. 4. Schedule: • Contractor did not work on July 4 or July 7 but will continue to work on the 21 "gravity sewer heading south towards manliole 22 this week. END OF REPORT Note to Recipient: If you believe there is an error in any part of the above information, please contact Taylor Engineering, Inc. immediately. SAA/02-042Q/ConstructionStatus 1/070803 Taylor Engineering, Inc. Page 2 Civil Desigi and C.and Planning 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 / E-MAIL tei@taylorengr.com SC'To pZne Valle ~ y 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Vatley WA 99206 509.688.0239 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0295 ♦ hrCspokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: June 3, 2009 To: File ~ From: Carriel ~ta, Deputy City Clerk Re: Moldy documents: P1753 Turtle Creek Survey Data Due to a water pipe breaking in City Hall's basement sometime last year, we are now discovering that several files contain documents with mold on them. The State Archivist Office confirmed with our City Clerk that we should make copies of, then destroy all moldy documents and make a not in the file; that is the purpose of this memorandum. The documents within this file are merely copies of documents which had mold and are now clean and can be handled without concern of contamination. The following lists the documents which were copied, then destroyed: • Final Plat of Turtle Creek First Addition, July 1997, date received 8/26/1997, Sheets 1 and 2 of 2 • Final Plat of Turtle Creek First Addition, July 1997, date received 8/26/1997, Sheet 2 of 2 • IPE Transmittal dated February 11, 1998, received February 12, 1998 to Dave Berto, Spokane County Engineering • Fourth Report Plat Certificate from Transnation Title Insurance Company dated 11/07/1998 for Turtle Creek First Addition, pages 1-5 of 5 • IPE Transmittal dated May 7, 1998, received May 8, 1998 to Dave Berto, Spokane County Engineering • Final Plat of Turtle Creek First Addition July, 1997, received August 26, 1997, Sheet 1 of 2 • Deed 298660A filed July 20, 1937 • Official Plat SEC.19 T.25N.R.45E. • Memo dated August 27, 1997 from John W. Pederson, Senior Planner of Spokane County to list of recipients regarding Proposed Final Plat of PE-1753-94; Turtle Creek 1 St Addition • Letter dated August 22, 1997 from Billie Jo Sparling, IPE, to Dave Berto, Spokane County regarding Turtle Creek First Addition PE-1753-94 • Recorded Correction Deed 32097-5 8 dated 2-28-1997 • IPE Transmittal dated June 8, 1998, received June 8, 1998 to Dave Berto, Spokane County Engineering • Transnation Title Insurance Company Certificate for filing plat of Turtle Creek First Addition • Final Plat of Turtle Creek First Addition received 5/08/1998, Sheets 1 and 2 of 2 • Final Plat of Turtle Creek First Addition received 5/08/1998, Sheets 1 and 2 of 2 RECFivED INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Sufte 200 Spolrane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax. (509)458-6844 FEB 12 ~QQ . . . . . :•~:::'~:~C pU . NNEMGINEER TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING b'ruarv''-1~`:- . : . . . ..vtit: r:. r : : . • • ~ - i.,: i::::•-}::: ••fr•~~•V~: CT::=:=>==:: =:9 . , :r.rG • ::ri:.:i::::::=`~ - = v: i . ~ . : y:: •.S:.i::::i1: •}r" L.:..y,~. •y..~{ 1 A~ ~ t ,l:.1:::~ ~ : . TTENTION. Dave Berto A . : . . , :~:~PROJ~~.TNAME:~`UR'~LE`~CR'E'E~K~:~=;:;:;:: . . . . -~:F=1RST~=A-0-~a1 O . .i Description: PE-1753-94 a Xerox Prints 0 Copy of Letter ❑ a Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents a • Title Report ■ Declaration of Cov. a No. Copies Descripfion . 1 Siqned and Notarized DrainaQe Declaration of Covenant P u rpose ❑ Information ■ Review & Comments a Per Your Request a Written Approval ❑ Signature & Return u Remarks Dave - Enclosed please find the signed and notarized Drainage Declaration of Covenant on the above referenced project. Please advise this office of the recording numbers so they can be put on the face of the final plat. If you have any questions, please contact this office. . Signed: Billie~ Jo Sparli~ig FROM TRRNSHHTION TITLE 389 926 1319 04,30,1998 15e52 N0,27 P. I k`:~ nC Rr . . wr, ~ I O S , ~~~t~rvw ` ~'+wr . , To rFram - . ~L°cat~°n Dept &WV; Fs~i! ---,tfielepboneR- . FOUi...._..._.~. ..-.,..~...__.»_._.~w ......_.~_._,1._.. .~Te19Dhonel ! r--- _ ~~__._.._____❑DQ!*W_._~_ DCaltorPbcQ •-r r.~....+..._w--.wc..."..~ y--sw.r::.=~-.v....en-.v,. ~.....~.n ~...-r..~..~.+_~u.f......~.r.~.~... ......~...r. PM JvYo TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NoRTH 7 2 0 ARcorrNS C~ Ust Mitlals SPOKANS, WASHZAJGTON 99212 Prepared for: - DAffiH DBYELOPMENT Order No. : MR2100$2-„ ATY'N j RICHA,RD DAHM E. 12720 NoRA - sTE. D ce s Inla-n-d Paeifie Engineering FOURTH REPCIRT P L A T C g R T I F= C A T 8 Dat.ed Q at 8:00 a.m. Cert.ificate for filing Plat of : TURTLE CREEK FIRST ADDITION, Ir1 the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for appz:aval, this company has examined the records of Spokane Ceunty Audi'tor's and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Diet:rict Court holding terme in said county. This cerG~ficate is made for the purpose herein apecified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transacti4n• Liability is limited to the amount, if any., paid for this cert:if icate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the tit].e to t:he folZowing described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit: That portion of the Southeast quarter of SecGion 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W,M., described as fo-llows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Southeast quarter; thence South 89046'12" East, along the North line 6aid Southeast quarter a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 00006' * East, a distance of 25.00 feet to the South right of way ri-ne- ighth Avenue and Trite Point of Beginni.ng; thence South 89°46' 12" East.,-along said South, right of way line, a distance _of 2426.20 aet to the weaterly right of way ' line of Barker Road; thehce Svut'h 00000' OOp Wegt, along DAI-c"esterly right of 'way line, a distance of 115 . 00 feet fhence DTorth,89°45' 12" ~ West, a diqtance of 7-3-9.67 feet; thence South 00013148" We$t,, a distance of 4.50 feet; thence North 89046112" West, a dlstance of 252.00 feet; thence North 00013148^ East, a distance of 4.•50 -feetl thence North 69046'I2" West,-a distance of 1060.00 feet;-thence South 75026128" West, a distance of 129.28 feet; thence 8outh 00013148" Weet, a distance of 65.00 Feeti thence North 55008105" West, a distance of 151.92 feet; thence North 61056'10" West, a distance of 146.45 feet; thence North 00°06141" West, a distance of 58.28 feet; thence South 89046' 12" East, a dietance- of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; ---&ftuate in the County of Spokane, Stat€ of Washington. .VE-ScTED IN: DA14M DEVELOPMENT, INC.{ a Washirtgton corporation. ~ ~ g4ge 1 of 5 FROM TRRNSNRTION TITIE 509 926 1519 04.30,1996 15:54 N0,27 P. 2 Order No: ME2100$2 EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no s~arch having been made thereof, as to Parcel N4: 55194, 9425 , Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor' s Maps available to the company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. 2. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19. 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GR.ANTEE: Pavific States Telephone and Telegraph Comparly PURPOSE: The right to erect, and maintain pales within the necessary wires and €ixtures thereon DATED: April 19, 1906 RECORDED: May 14, 1906 RECORDING NO.: 142606 4. EASEMSNlP AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: The United States of America PURPOSE: Construct, reconstruct, operate and maintain and remove a water pipeline or conduit and appurtenances AREA AFFECTED: The Eaet 10 feet of tbe South 1470 feet of the North 1495 feet of the West half of the East half of the Southeast quarter and the west lo feet of the South 1470 feet of the North 1495 feet of the East half of the East half of the Southeast quarter all in Section 19 and The East 10 feet of the South 1168 feet of the iVorth 1193 feet of the West half of the west half of the Southeast quarter and the West 10 feet of the South 11689 feet of the North 1193 feet of the East half of the West half of the Southeast quarter all in Section 19 RECORDED: July 23, 1965 RECORDING NO.: 126474C Page 2 o f 5 FROM TRRNSNATION TITLE 509 926 1519 04,30.1998 15:54 N0.27 P. 3 Order No. ME210082 5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GR.ANTEE: Millar A. Morrison, husband of boris Morrison, dealing in his separate property, and Harry A. Morrison, husband of Cloyde M. Norrison, dealing in his separate property PURPOSE: A perpetual right-of-way eaaement to survey, construct, operate., inspect, maintain, and remove a water pipeline or conduit and appurtenances thereto DATED: October 1, 1965 RECORDED: October 22, 1965 RECORDING NO.: 149968C 6. AGRSEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: August 3, 1995 RECOR.DING NO.: 9508030115 REGARDING: Sewer Connection Agreement between Spokane County, Heptons and Dahm Development, Tnc., with Latecomer Provisions 7. SEWER AND UTILITY LINE EASEMErT'Z' AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: IN FAVOR: Saltese Syndicate LLC, herein referred as to "Saltese" and Millar Morrison, II and Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investment Company, Dahm Development, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Meridian Land, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company and S& B Investments, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company PURPOSE: Installation, repair, maintenance and replacement of various utilities lines, ' including but not limited to a sewer line AREA AFFECTED: 30 feet in width over, across and under the First Party's real property RECORDED: March 26, 1997 - RECORDING NO.: 4087934 8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington PURPOSE: Constructing, operating and maintaining a sewer system AREA AFFECTED: 8 inch sewer line will be installed over the subject easement RECORDED: , July 31, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4126696 Page 3 of 5 FROM TRRNSNATION TITLE 509 926 1519 04,50,1998 15:55 N0,27 P. 4 Order NQ, ME210082 9. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMEN'£ AND THE TERMS AND CONpITI9NS THEREOF : GR.ANTEE: The Washington Water Power Company, a Washington Corporation PURPOSE: Construct, reeonstruct, aperate, maintain, repair, and replace an overhead electric distribution line AREA AFFECTED: NortM/South line approximatel.y 1,130 feet East of the West line of said property AND to place one anchor and downguy approximately 200 feet East of the West lien of said property near the North edge thereof, "facilities" on, over, under, along and across the herein described . property, together with all necessary facilities and appurtenances RECORDED: November 6, 1997 RECQRDING NO.: 4158164 10. STREET LIGHTING AGREET+SENT AND THE TERMS AND CQNDITIONS THEREQF: RECORDED: NQvember 24, 1997 RECORDING,NO,: 4163467 11. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRArTTOR: Dahm Development, Inc., a Washi.ngton corporation TRUSTEE: Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a r,Washington corporation BENEFICIARY: Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, Husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investment Company, as to an undivided 55a interest; and S & B Investments, L.L.C., a `washington Limited Liability Company, as to an undiviaed 45o interest ~ ORIGINAL AMOUNT : $140, 000 . 00 DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4052458 , SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY AGREEMENT DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 40!52459 The above Deed of Trust was made subordinate to the Deed of Trust recorded under Recording No. 4164140, set forth at paragraph 13 herein. Page 4 of 5 FROM TRANSNATION TITLE 509 926 1519 04.30,1998 15:56 N0,27 P. 5 ' , Order No. ME2100$2 12. NOTICE OF OPTION AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF; OPTION4R: Richard B. Jarvi$ and Ruth L. Jarvis, husband and wife, d/b/a Jay znvestments, as ta an undivided 55% interest and S& B Inve$tmerits, L.L.C., a Waehington Limited Liability Gompany, as to an undivided 450 interest OPTIONEE: Meridian Investments, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company PROPERTY: Turtle Creek - DATED: November 5, 1996 RECORDED: November 18, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4055408 AFFECTS• This and other property 13. DEED OF TRIIST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF; GRANTOR: Dahm Development Inc., a Washington Corporation TRUSTEE: Transnation Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: Washington Trust Bank, a corporation ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $719,500.00 DATED: November 21, 1997 RECORDED: November 25, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4164140 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. END OF FXCFsPTIONS TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY B~Y For service on thi.sorde-rc-all: (509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519 Nficki Erwin, Title Officer Enclosure: Paragraphs 3 - 11 Sketch sc Page 5 of 5 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 . . ::;...=:i . - . . . ~:;f.:: ~ ~ =r fY: - • ' •:!f:..: TO: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING . r r,•} r . ..r.1}4:.. F:' : ' . ll..}•. J.. ~•~'f•j~ ..•!J~%i.~. i •.'jY _ • V{i :{e . i•' r:..: . - . . •1'.•~':. ~ ' ~y .l'li - 7~1~05~::;~: ~ R{T#:{:;~:~:... . . . . •J 1 f ~ . i{. BertO ave I N.~ D NT O ATTE : - - . - : . PROJ.ECTN-'1MEREE,K~~::~ <:::::::::;~; - - - ~T1~C~ . PROJECT: PE . . . . -1753_94 F~I RSTAD D 1 rr.: . . . . . Description: ■ Xerox Prints ❑ Copy of Letter cl ❑ Original Drawing a Contract Documents ❑ ■ Title Report a Declaration of Cov. a No. Copies Description , 1 Title Reoort 1 Red-lined Check Prints , 1 Revised Final Plat , Purpose a Information ■ Review & Comments ❑ Per Your Request ❑ Written Approval a Signature & Return a Remarks Dave - Enclosed please find a copy of the Up-dated Title Report and the Revised Final Plat with the red-lined check prints for the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. ~ , . . C9 E~~~; o & i99$ ° S~~KANE CO`JNTY EidG!NEER ~ Signed: Billi Jo Sparling .6._A.iE 10 :3p.3,,Ty.GTUi: . ru:31-Ci.lil[; at spOi..~ - Yl.(3 Jtino 14, 1940 . , i • _"-c ..-..........--............-..____.--------------..._..__-__»__--__....--.....----l.-....-..-............-......___ 293660A M;FD L`eed i giled Jul. 2C. 19317 10 IS ,~,,1 ;'/I,u7.A5 the roal. ostatE ;nFreinu~'tcr doscx~ibed was throuoz in- i Zeq 5pokane '1'itle Co advcctenc3 ana m~ sts.c(. inclliaQ1 i~1 c~ 'rreaslzrer's deoci dated ~ -t'ranlc J Glover Aud the a)th clay of ~'obrutirjr, 1934, froln the Treasurer ni' Spolcane ~ E iroistad Dep Count;y, l'Vashingi;on, to i,he. "}poi:ane :alley Trrigation Distr-ic1:, nec b,y Ivj Dean . conveyinC the aout-heast ;,:izar.ter of Socti cLri 19, `j'ownship 25, i (."14 P1l.1-R r`:3 r<orth of Renge 45 r' i'! -the grantors, H. 6.5pedden and Laisy L. Spodden, 11is viifa, being the sticcessors in interest ~ of tLie party to w?iam Sa-id real e state' was assessed; ~ . ; ~fIER1:.AS, it is desired to rei;sove the cl.oud upon the f.:rantees titlo ta saici real estate cattaet-I ~ bv said treasiirer's deecl, Nvhich act3.on nas baon atii:r•.orizNd by a reso:lution of the Board of ; Di.rectors of saicl irxigation d.i,trict auly adopted ut aspecial meetinE; theroof lZOlci. _on the 14th day oi ilecember, 1936. i ' E i•; 0W> THEt{.EF'GRF> THT6 IICDE,HPTUt{E made th:i. s ll-th day oC Z+' ebruary, 1937, by and b etween tllo I _Spokane Va11ey Irriga•tiorl ,Distri.ct, a quasi-nn?.29.c'Lpa1 corpoi atio» of Spclcane ,(%aunty, Wc~sk►i~.~;~.o: ~ ancl Ii. a. S dden and Dn•ls L. Ueddon liis wifo,al~ , - P~ y I~ p , , i,ti o3 of 1;11e ~'ir.~t par~- Arzd Mi1.].or A. , Tv;orri son, vrhose wif e' g rnare is Jot is l+iorri sor_, arxl `Iarry A. I:orr]. son, a baclielor, ParUies o f ~ the S econd Part. WITP1rSSETj1; '1'hat t`ie firSt partios f'or and in consideration of the stun of orie Pol.laiy, i the receipt of which i s li ei°eb f ac?motivledged, haB convr;yed and qufi, claimed and does by t~~ze so ! presonts'convey and quit clzim unto the parties of t},lo second part all of t1mir right, title ~ and tntere st in' and to the follotving describecl r ea7_ .,;,state situa ted in Spokane Uounty, t91s.sh- i%rton, to-wit: The right-of-vray for a ditch 20 feet wide alonL ttle nAtural outlet of Salteso 1a1.e, extond3.rC; in,a southsa'sterly and no•rthwesterly direction thxau(.;h tyie sauthaast quarter of Section 19, ` in Township 25, r?orth of :priro 45, E','! I~~. , ~ - ~ said righl-of-vJay having been conveyed by James Pari^ to J.B. Schrum by decd dated 3une 2) ; 1890, recorded in the Ptiiblic recorcls of the Auditor of Spokane County, v'iashingtan, in bool;. A of Deods ori Page lOFi, and ha ,ring beenconveyed b-ir J. B. Shrtim to Peter Morrison by deed ; dated beceinY>er 31, 1907; also a;trip o#' larrd 15 f.eet in Nvidth dd,joi.ninqn saJ.d r:Ight-of-`va3* ~ on w'ie nor.tYierly side thereof. ~ It is understood and heraby a`,reed that t17e 6pol;ane V`a11ey Irra.gat:Loi-i Listri ct resarves tYie ~ ri.grht to use, repair and mair.tain the, highrray crossl.ng anci irri;ation pipe line novr consi;ruct-- • ed acro ss said strip of :Laricl also all right s o fasse:i.inent v4--icn the distri'ct iiiiay have aL,<<in:. i- amid strip of land, berause of the fact thFAt the samc is incluclod within its boundaries. ~ In witness wliereof tha sai.d Spokane Va11e,y IrriSat:l.on llisrrict h.as catised its corporate seul ~ ta bu liereto' affixod and `0ii3 a.ndenttire to be hi€•ned, executed, ac)azov,ledged arxi deli.vererl. i•~: . j_ts na7:le arri bohalf bJ its rresidont and Socretary oi tt•ic; Boarcl of Di.rectors, and the saad H. S. Speuden and Dai-sS L. apedde;:, his ivifo, ltav~o e::ccuted and de? icrered said lnatruineiit ai.!. ~ in the dav and year fir;;t vi•ritten Yiereim,. ~ i i ~ ~poLa~ze V~.~ley Irr2gation Distric~, :SPQI~?P~ i-AL,LE~.I IitRTG~1TI0r1 ~T5Tk70T : Bv Ear~, W. Petti.bonE, ; ~ ~:aTA TE OF' WA6HTNGTON aZAL , Proaident I d~tc~~t-.--T--T--Grant--S---»---------. 'T. S~aecade;n ~ , ecretRrJ L'•aisf L. bpedd4n STATE OF 'rtAS;i I?+j GTOI: i County of Spokane ) sis tY:o lindarsi ed a p? ~ , < , „ _ gnot~zrs Pub]_a.c in ar.d f'ar the a~:~c~1Ye n~med. cc~unty v,_ic? tafiE, he?~eby ce: t_,~';j that o:z the • 16th cf t'~eUru.ary 1937, there perserally appeared before ma Eur? !'ettS.bono an3 'C. T. ' Urant, to me 1•:nown i,a 13e tt-le president anu 5ec^etary rospectivel,y of the dlstrlr.t L'hat efecuted tYie rvithin and ioregoin4; instrument and ad:n~-iv ledgc;d t.Yie; eaicl 9.nstruJyent i,o be the fxee and voluntanj act ~.nd dv4d of said district, ."or, the LiSes and pt_rpoues tYiorei.n inen-- - "tioned, and,each on oat;r stai;ed that he ,vras autizori.Zocl tc e-r.cc7.ito said instxument and tiiat the seal affixed is the carpor.-te sea7, oi saxd clist;rict. Given undor my Lia.nd and of t.Icial soal i,liio 16th da;~ or i,'cbx uar;T 1037. ~ Clertn E•, C;unningtuzm, Flotury Publ.ic .'.GLE'NN' E. CU.PT:1IAiC;-HkM, NC2'4:'tY 111BLT(: . in ana for the 'ottite of ;Yashington, ',:STA'!'P- C:' WA6:IINGT011 . rE::9.cLint; at Spolccane. ' -.G11i.:I5SiUAi.°;~:rtPIIiES June "A1940 . -T________________________ , ~~~~TATE CF' :'FAS:ZIIdGTON ~ County af Spokane ; ss. ~ • I, 'tt:.e Undars.Lgned a notAr;j- n41k>:Lic in and iar 1;1•je a cove nnmed co•_,nt-;,r an.ct stato, h.PrEb;; cortit'~.• ~ r ~ i. 7.. ~ , • ~ ~ , • : - 4, i • • , ` iiyli,S(.~• a- i P' "ni~HY: 1"a~~. ~ :H . i;.c•, 't, ; 4.t•., i' . ~•K- ' ' . Y. " . f •7 ' y •7 S P O K A N E ,o', C O U N T Y - , BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTIviENT JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SC077, P.E., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM DATE: August 27, 1997 TO: Spokane County Division of EnLrineering and Roads; Pat Harper Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red Spokane County Division of Building & Planning; Jeff Forry Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair; Steve Horobiowski Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer . Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irri gation District Central Valley School District No. 356 FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner ~ SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat of PE-1753-94; Turtle Creek 1' Addition Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any comments by September 10, 1997. If you have any questions you may contact me at 456-3675. Thank you. kc Enclosure ' c: Meridian Land L.L.C. c/o Rich Dahm, 12720 E. Nora, Suite D, Spokane, WA. 99216 Ramm Associates, Inc., 25 S. Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202 Inland Pacific Engineering, 707 W. 7`h, SuIte 200, Spokane, WA. 99204 1026 WEST BRUADLVAY AVENUE ' SI'OsCANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 4564703 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . ~ INLAND PACIFiC ENGINEERING, INC. August 22, 1997 Our Job No. 97105 Mr. Dave Berto Spokane County Engineer's Off ice North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: Turtle Creek First Addition PE-1753-94 Dear Dave: Enclosed please f ind two copies of the draft final plat referenced above. Please review for final approval. The enclosed check for $100 is the plat check fee. Enclosed also is a copy of the plat certificate, and a copy of the signed Agreement to Pay Fee. Please call if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, IN ACIFIC ENGINEERING CO. Bi i Jo Sparling /bjs Enc. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, VVA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 • 509-458-6640 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 , , • . l~ 4087933 WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO Page: 1 of 8 Rr►t~5 rAT 44, ' il fS Co i W/2611991 03:45P TRUNRENBOLZ & ROHR, PZLC. $5,04 SpAane Co, WA East 12704 Nora Avenue Spokane, WA 99216 CORRBCTYON DBBD ~ THE GRANTORS, SALTBSE SYNDICATS LLC, and Washington Limited Liability Company a.nd MILLAR MORRISON, II., a married person as his sole and separate property; For and i.n Consideration of, NONE, to correct the legal description; conveys and warrants to: GRANTBBS, RICSARD B. JARVIS and RUTH L. J.ARVIS, husband and wife, d/b/a JAY INVBSTMENT COMPANY, DAffiri DS'DBIAPMENT, INC., A Washinqton Gorporation, and MBRIDZAN LAND, L.L.C., a Washington Li.mited Liability Company; LBGAI,: A 35 foot wide strip of land, in the SE 1/4 and B 330.00 feet ot the SW 1/4 of Sec.19, T25N, R45S, W.M. (full legal found on Bxhibit "1",. exceDt as stated in Exhibit "3",Pages b& S, of this correction deed) ~ PARCEL NO: A portion of 55194.9025 The Parties have agreed that the effect of this deed shall be to alter the leqal description of Grantor's existing property, described in Exhibit "Z", attached hereto and incorporated herein to be that of the property described in Exhibit "3, "(also known to the parties as the Resurveyed Parcel "A" in the newly formed Agreement of Understanding, between the above described parties, dated February , , 1997). The Grantors currently own the property described in Exhibit "1", and the Grantees currently own the property described in Exhibit "2", all of which are attached hereto and incorporated herei.n. Accordingly the Grantors grant to the Grantees that portion af the Exhibit "1" property whi.ch is nat currently included in the legal description of the Exhibit "3" property and Grantees grant to Grantors that portion of the Exhibit "2" property included in the Exhibit "3" property that was not included in the Exhibit "1" property. The final result is that Grantors property shall hereafter consist only of the property described in Exhi.bit "3"9700003212 ~ Exclse Tax Paid d! Dated: Febniary- , 1997. . Sal mt. Pd.. ~ CountY GRANTORS: • MILLAZ.MORRISON,` II { , ♦ • y . 4087933 Page: 6 of 8 0312611991 00;45P ~NSA Ql, iLE IHS 00 ► $15.u Spokane Co, Wt ExHJIBIT u 1 w LBGAL D$SCRIPTION A strip of land 35 feet in width in the Sautheast Quarter and the East 330.00 feet of the Southwest Quarter of Section 19, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., conBistinq of a 20 foot wide ditch riqht of way along the natural out2et of Saltese Lake, as described and conveyed by deed recorded in Book "A' of Deeds, page 106, in Spokane County, Washington, and a 15 foot wide strip of land lying northerly to and adjoining said 20 foot wide ditch right- of-way, as described and conveyed by deed recorded in Book 473 of Deeds, page 410: Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. .g. ` , . . - • - ~ 4087933 ' Paqe; I of 6 0312611991 03:45P TUSAT Q1, ilE ifS (X, ► '13.00 SP06 Go, WA ~ 'lurt 1e Creek LEGAL DFSCRIPTION ~ ~ The Southeast Quarter and the East 330.(}0 feet of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter, all in Section 19, T.ZS N., R.45 E., W.M.; EXCEPT that portion lying within countv road right of way; ALSO EXCEPT that portion conveyed to Spokane County by instrument recorded October 2, 1974 under Auditor's Document No. 7410020196; ALSO EXCEPT a strip of land 35 feet in width in the Southeast Quarter and the East 330.00 feet of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter, alt in Section 19, T.ZS N., R.45 E., W.M., said strip lying 10 feet southerly and 25 feet northerly from the foliowing described centerline: Beginning at a point vn the easteriy line of said Southeast Quarter which bears S.00°00'00"E. a distance of 1173.52 feet from the Northeast Corner of said Southeast Quarter; thence N.67°22'34"W, a distance of 131.57 feet; thence N.68°-'56'59"W. a distance of 75.50 feet; thence N.70°26'53"W. a distance of 102.89 feet; theace N.73°37'08"W. a distance of 183.78 feet; thence N.74°49'00"W. a distance of 921.87 feet; thence N.64°4236"W. a distance of 122.93 feet; thence N.60°02'20"W. a distance of 246.08 feet; thence N.75° 10' l9"W. a distance of 121.07 feet; thence N.63 °07' 17"W. a distance of 135.69 feet; thence N.65 °50'07"W. a distance of 121.14 feet; thence N.62°12'55"W, a distance of 118.99 feet; thence N.56°35'34"W. a distance of 56.78 feet; thence N.37°01'52"W. a distance of 94.25 feet; thence N.42° 14'40"W. a distance of 56.21 feet; thence N.54°35'33"W, a distance of 53.02 feet; thence N.61 °2742"W. a distance of 70.92 feei; thence N.59°09'47"W. a distance of 92.02 feet; thence N.SS °37'S1 "W. a distance of 101.30 feet; thence N.58°0I'27"W. a distance of 101.62 feet; thence N.60°30'57"W. a distance of 71.45 feet to the nort6 line of said East 330.00 feet of the North half of the Southwest Quarter, being the terminvs pvint of this centerline description, which terminus point bears N.89°47'37"W. a distance of 35.5I feet From the Cenier 1/4 Corner of said Sec[ion 19; the sidelines of said strip being extended or shortened to meet tTie' ' westerly margin of Barker Road and said nocth line of said East 330.00 feet of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington 7 , . . ~ 4087933 Page; 8 of 8 031260997 00:45P EDaEU, R:NS ~1 i 1, i!TL INS CO D 3 ~ 5.u Spokane Co, U Resurreyed Parcel "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION ✓ ( ~ ~ PARCEL •`A„ ~ r Metes and Bounds Description of Saltese Lake Outlet A strip of land 35 feet in width in the Southeast Quarter and the East 330.00 feet of the North . Half of the Southwest Quarter, all in Section 19, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., said strip lying 17.50 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Beginning ai a point on the easterly line of said Southeast Quarter which bears S.00°00'00°E. a distance of 1173.52 feet from the Northeast Corner of said Southea.st Quarter; thence N.67°2234"W. a distance of 131.57 feet; thence N.68°5659"W. a distance of 75.50 feet; thence N.70°Z6'S3"W. a distance of 102.89 feet; thence N.73°37'08"W. a distance of 183.78 feet; thence N.74°49'00"W. a distance of 921.87 feet; thence N.64°42`36"W. a distance of 122.93 feet; thence N.60°02'20"W. a distance of 246.08 feet; thence N.75°10'19"W. a distance of 121.07 feet; thence N.63007'17"W. a distance of 135.69 feet; thence N.65°50'07"W. a distance of 121.14 'feei; thence N.62012'55"W. a distance of 118.99 feet; thence N.56°35'34"W. a distance of 56.78 feet; thence N.37°01'52"W. a distance of 94.25 feet; thence N.42° 14'40"W. a distance of 56.21 feet; thence N.54°35'33"W. a distance of 53.02 feet; thence N.61°27'42"W. a distance of 70.92 feet; thence N.59°09'47"W. a distance of 92.02 feet; thence N.55°37'5 1"W. a distance of 101.30 feet; thence N.58°01'27"W, a distance of 101.62 feet; thence N.60°30'57"W. a distance of 71.45 feet to the north line of said East 330.00 feet of the North half of the Southwest Quarter, being the ternunus point of this centerline description, which ternunus point bears N.89047'37"W. a distance of 35.51 , feet from the Center 1/4 Corner of said Section 19; the sidelines of said strip being extended or shortened to meet said north line of said East 330.00 feet of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter. EXCEPT any partion lying within Barker Road. Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. G. ~ ~acAl . g : .e; •a ' O ~93128 ~~cwaES , yr~ Q S ~ W 8 INLAND PAC.IFIC ENGINEERING - TRANSMITTAL 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 - - - - . . . ~ . - - - - . . . . . '-Y1.r sw•'. • ENGINEERING A. ..D~~..~'T;;Jurie::8...9.98:~:::~;~>::::~ TO: SPOKANE COUNTY .,i}titi:4}•.~. . : ~ . . . ; i.: ; : ~ ~ . : • . . .'-':ti• ::::v::•.•.:•.::w. . . ' ' " 5;:,::;.'•:.;;.;::}:i.:.~.::..'~.'•::::i~.:::.::'._:'_'.:}-"•: •:rr:'.'.::".•:1:''r::.:' - RECEIVE[3 - - ~ . . . . . . SPOKANE CQUNT~ :=:-1~P:E:~C: :PROJECT #-_::::::~971~L-?5=.~:::-:-:::::;;':;`;=~:: .:;i~:::.;; ATTENTION: Dave Berto . : _:._:;...,.:x.:.~:.~:: . 1998 - - J1~N 0 8 P,RCj.~~C~'..-.TI~-RTL~ C~ZE~K:-: . t:i. :~'r:{~'C:: - :•::.~:rr: PROJECT• . P-1753-94 ::v~ ~;F•;: . [lIVISION UF HUIL,DfiVG ANd PI..AN 41~t - - • . . . ~ , Description: BY: ■ Xerox Prints a Copy of Letter a ■ Original Drawing ❑ Contract Documents ❑ U Title Report a Declaration of Cov. ❑ No. Copies Description 1 Oriqinal Mylar (2 sheets) 1 Red-I i ned check pri nts 1 Up-dated Plat Certificate Purpose a Information a Review & Comments a Per Your Request ■ Written Approval a Signature & Return ■ FilinQ Remarks Dave - Enclosed please find the original signed mylar for the above referenced project. Please start the finalization procedures. Thank you for your assistance on the development of this project. ; Signed: Billie Jo`S arling ~ , . ~ ; l; U TRANSNATION TITLE INSLTR.AIVCE COMPANY NORTH 7 2 O ARGONNE ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 9 9 212 - Prepared f or : "DAfIlM DE'VELOPMENT Order No.: M210082 ATTN; RICHARD DAHIM E. 12720 NOR.A - STE. D cc: Inland Pacific Engineering P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E Dated July 3, 1997 at 8:00 a.m. Certificate for filing Plat of : TURTLE CREEK FIRST A.DDITION. ' In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit: That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., described as follows: sVG a6yiie BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Southeast quarter; thence South 8 9° 4 6' 12 " East, along the North line Qf saiSoutheast quarter a distance of 200.00 feet; thence South 00°13'4 West, a distance of 25 . 00 feet to the South ri3ht of waY of Eighth Avenue and True Point -of Beginning; thence South 8 9° 4 6' 12 " East, along said South right of way line, a distance of 2426.20 feet to the Westerly right of way line of Barker Road; thence South 00000'00" West, along said Westerly right of way line, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence North 89046112" West, a distance of 2051.67 feet; thence South 75026128" West, a distance of 129.28 feet; thence South 00013'48" West, a nce of 65.00 feet; thence North 53025 0pl West, a ance of &55. ~ feet; r 6105611011 West, a dis ce of es13 .feet; thence North 00°13'48" ast, a distance o 0 feet to the ue Point of Cyinning ; ~ ~v01a Situate in tze County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Washington corporation. . Page 1 of 3 , . . ~ Order No. ME210082 EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel No. 55194.9025. Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor' s Maps available to the company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the company makes no assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. . 2. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19. ' 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Pacific States Telephone,and Telegraph Company PUR.POSE: The right to erect, and maintain poles within the necessary wires and fixtures thereon DATED: April 19, 1906 RECORDED: May 14, 1906 RECORDING NO.: 142606 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Millar A. Morrison, husband of Doris Morrison, dealing in his separate property, and Harry A. Morrison, husband of Cloyde M. Morrison, dealing in his separate property PURPOSE: A perpetual right-of-way easement to survey, construct, operate, inspect, maintain, and remove a water pipeline or conduit and appurtenances thereto DATED: October 1, 1965 RECORDED: October 22, 1965_- . RECORDING NO.: 49968C 5. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: August 3, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9508030115 REGARDING: Sewer Connection Agreement between Spokane County, Heptons and Dahm Development, Inc., with Latecomer Provisions 6. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Dahm Development, Inc., a Washington corporation TRUSTEE : Tz'anSnz± i nn Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: K----Vashington Trust ~ OR I G I NAL AMOUNT : r, - DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4052457 . Page 2 of 3 ` ' . . • '4 ,i . . ~ ' Order No. ME210082 7. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: . GR.ANTOR: Dahm Development, Inc., a Washington corporation TRUSTEE: Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a Washington corporation BENEFICIARY: Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, Husband and wize, d7b7`-a 3ap ment Company, as to an undivided 55% interesC; a-ffd S9 B Investments, L. L. C., a Washington Limited-L~alMity Company, as to an undivided 450i'interest ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $140,000.00 DATED: November l, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4052458 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: BY AGREEMENT DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4052459 The above Deed of Trust was made subordinate to the Deed of Trust recorded under Recording No. 4052457, set forth at paragraph 5 herein. 8. NOTICE OF OPTION AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: OPTIONOR: Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investments, as to an undivided SSa interest and S& B Investments, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 450 rP~t- 1.Il~F7 OPTIONEE: ~ Meridian Investments, L.L.C., a Washington 'ted Liability Compan _ PROPERTY: Turtle Creek _ DATED: November 5, 1996 RECORDED: November 18, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4055408 END OF EXCEPTIONS TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 1 1 ~ ^ I " 1 / BY j ~L <<" ~ , For service on this order call: (509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519 Micki Erwin, Title Officer Enclosure: Paragraphs 3 - 8 Sketch . sc . Page 3 of 3 ~ I I ~ f V4 1 . i . ~ NOTJCE OP OPTION nz IT HNOPJN lhnc an Option (or the purchase of renl property has been given as follows; . i rX~ ~ • L~ OPTIONOII RICHAI;p H. JARVIS end RUTH L JAIIVIS, Hmband and Wife, d/ble JAY AIVE3TMENTS, en lo nn undivided I'iRy five percent (66%) and S & B WVESTMENTS, L.LC., A WneAington Limlted lrability ComPsnY, i ae tc an undivided forly Gve pereent ictve3t (45%), . ~ OPTIONE6: 4055408 ; MERIDIAN INVE3TMENTS, L.LC., A Nnehington Limited Liability % Pagc: 10l 2 , COmPanY 1111811496 04:29 i PItOPEIt1'Y: fNh'SN,1 DN~ 1. IkS f0 N ~9.OD Spola~t 60, 6l TUR'17.E CREEI{, (See ettached Ealubi~ •A' which u ineorporated herein). September 25, 1496 EPf'ECI'IYE DATE; November LEGAL DESCRIP'TION ~ t ~ DATED lhis dey of November,1B08. i The Soulheast Quarier and the East 330.00 fal of the Norih Half of the Saulhwut Quarier, all in SecGon 19, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M.; ~ OPTIONOR- I EXCEPT Ihat portion lying wilhin caunty road righl of way; ~ ~ JAY iNVE$TASEMPg ALSO EXCFPT that poriion conveyod lo Spokane County by inslNmcnt rccordod Oclober 2, s& D~rvESTt~tENTS, kk~, 1974 undet Auditor's Document No. 7410020196; • AiSO EXCEPT a sUip of land 35 fcet in wideh In the Southeast Quarter and the East 330.00 1ftxn~~ B. JaRVIS/~ By' ~ rr fat of the North Half of the Southwrst Quarter, a11 in Seclion 19, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., , said strip lying 10 fal souUudy and 25 fat northerly from the following describod , cenledine: ~ ~ &ginning at a point on the easledy line of said Soulheast Quarter which bcars i RU1'H L. JARylS, py Riclwd D. Jervis, i,e', 4055400 S.00000100'E. a dislance of 1177.52 fal from the Northeast Corner of :aid Soulheast otlorney in fn~l Pigr I ol ~ Quarter; lhence N,67°22'34'W, a distance af 131.51 lxt; thenex N.68°56'59'W, a wsVutiow, lit iyc co N fo,m SpolBnrQto, u:?if distance of 75.50 fa:l; Ihence N,70'26'53'W, a distance of 102,89 fcct; thence ~ tTn'rr; OF 1VA19111N4-1-0 M t N,73037'08"W, a dislance of 183.76 fal; tlience N.74'49'00'W. a distance of , ) Cou+h• 921,87 Ixt; Ihence W,64642'36'W, a dislance of 122.93 fal; thenco N,60°02'20'W, ~ ars~~„~ ~ ~ On thli dey peraonrlly eppenrod brfure me ]t1C(IAflU lt. JNIVIJ, lo ine luiown to be the uidi.~idunl deecriLcd in a dislanee of 246,08 feel, thence N.7510 19 w, A dillm1CE 0r 121.07 fttl; OICIICC und who erecuted the wlUun eLnd forcgoing ►iulrument, for IuwseU end nLw w Attorney in Pact for RUTH L. JA1tV1S, N.63'07' 17'W, a dislance of 135.69 teet; Ihence N.65050'07'W, a diStanCe of end ocknowledged lhpt he eigned the eame as Aia Gee nnd volwitery ecl end deed for himetU nnd nLso +u her free nnd 121.14 (etl; lhellCe N,62' 12'SS'W, 8 d'ISlenCp Of 118,99 fat; thence N,56°35'34'W. j vo1unL°lY A<< and deed cs Altomey in Fnct for eeid prineipJ for the ueee md pur poeea lherein menlioned, and on onlh , a disLanee of 56,78 fCCI; Ihence N.37'01'52'W. 3 d'ISl3nCe of 94.25 (ul; lhenCe "Lated tlNt lhe Power of Attorney authoruing the execuUon of lhi3 irutrumenl hes nol been revoked and tliat said e~. o~~ principel is now 6ving end is nol ineane. N.42 l4 40 W. a distance of 56.21 feel; tlience N.Sd 35 33 W, a distance of 53.02 1,p n~ ~~ly~nder my hand nnd olficial eeal Ude dn of NOVEW3E feee; Ihence N.61'27'42"W, a dislance of 70.92 fxl; lhrnce N.59°09'41'W, a ~~~gP j • Hq~~o,,~ y ~ l~ee. dittance of 92.02 ful; Ihence N.55'37'51'W. a distance of 101.30 fcce; thcnce Q,~;gS~ONF~4'~y-; • N.58'01'21"W, a dislance of 101,62 feel; Ihence N.60°30'57`W, a clislance of 71.45 ~ y~u NOTARY p~"a • fN. : No4vy Public for fiF Slute of feel lo the narth line of said Ease 330,00 fecl of the North half of the Soulhwesl - 1 Quarier, being the terminus poinl of lhis cenlerline descriplion, which terminus poinl PUBUC ~°~""~`01~ R~'~"c ''c.`' o ~ , • '.,,G ~0 ~ Y mmiesion e:p'vee: y bears N.89 47 37"W. a dislance of 35.51 Ixl from the CenteF 1!4 Corner of said udn P ••.r...:..•~ V , Section 19; the sidclines of said slrip being extended or shortcncd to meet ~ie" ~F wASNA`.,,-° westerly margin of Darker Road and said north line of said East 330,00 fat of the STATE OF Wq$HINC7'ON ) North Half of the Southwesl Quarier, ) ss. ' Cowty of Spokane ) , . Situate in the County of 5pokane, Stale of Washington ~ On lhis 1/' dny of November, 1998, before me, the undenigned, e Nolary publie in and for the SLate of Washin6'tati. dWy roennis.+ioned pnd aworN personeUy aPpenred, fl -Irr, i, to me known ta be the ' 17'J1 ,r „I ,,f- af S* E(? /n v„y_„ „f.r f/ f_ lhe IimiLed liabilit mm foregoing uivtrumenl, and ecknowledged the mid instrwnent to bc Uie free end volw y ~y ~~t exsaid the eed • for the usea en4,pur7w3es thS~~iR roenlioned, nnd on oeth eteted thnt he we3 aulhori:ed lo exeeute the said irytrwn~en~, C1VEN vlider ' en 0~?y~Cicial eeal th , e dny nnd yenr 1ul above written, - . . ~ ,P4 , J`9gt0li F+. /,P . . . ~ y'u NOTaAV'~^'c , No 1 lary PubGc un mid ~r lh ' f e State a( / . Wd+hington, residing''m PUAUC ' 2 . ' N~~ My Co~wni.uion Expvea; n' . C. t.1 A . J~-y. . . . _ . , . . , . . , wui u1'lurt~ . /1 ~'y Nashington Ttusl Bbnk; , • ~ 1 • I3ui1Jcr Secvlcea L~~~~y 7 5 ~ ~ 117 H. Sirague Avenue ~ ~ ' Spokme, WA 99261 D C C D O r T R U S,r 'J ►1-I el PCV l1 . ~ . ~1~' ~ r WkiL'N RECOIti)ED ItETUA1J 7'0; • nusu' Tk n-ri,4~k~i~ l s t • mr„4 Nam~ b e r Iy 96 4 0 5 2 A 5 6 ,~ura ~cn~u~r. o n l it D b v e ~ o~ N l'"' T R C., A kns~ingcm Coiporatirn ~ 1 ~1 0 l l , ~ 'RMiSNnTICN'TI7't~INStIRNJCE" OCNp111:r TfiUNKEN}30LZ & ROH1~ PI.[.C. I Il Pt9~ 4L'~P IIxRU'Borto.ar'I. Eall 12704 Norn Aveoue I 11• }[}1,~FIf0 IbfR10 'CNl1[f~ YlI O1C BMIlrKIif~', WASIIINLTUN TkUST UANV;. a tupwwiw Wr~nircJ yd uiying unlcr ik 6 ri of iiK btaic ul ~ SPp~e, WA 8J218 u Wumn{wnlAueia'Lrnk1"G ~~~q~~ ~~11F ~YS IA Wmwtr. b CnuidcryMn ul ~M inkhedtu krtw rtiinl wl dr W u hurin MryeJ. irtrruiUlr En~w udcunrtr~ w Tnurt, w truµ. )I•5011 WIIO ~IYy210I YI[, ~k lulluwtn~ Jr~riGnl yenr 4~~n1(n pK Cwwy uf SpokAf18 y„AC „f hl~eshinqtan , 9TATUTOBY WAR1tANTY DEED A portta► of the Sathcast Warter of Section 19. Z2M:ih10..2J.Nnrth, Itenq.~_ 15 Faet, w.M., lying NorUberly of Ibo FaLiaing describod laxl: THE GRaN1'O1L4,1UC1lARD a JARVL9 md ftUTi1 L JAIiVt9, Susbmd md Pfila dMa JAY A strlp of lend 35 feet xlda, seid 35 faot atrip of-land mnaisttng of L a~0 foot wirJe ditch' rlqht of wey nlang che naeual outlet of Selteae INypS1'MQ;N'P CObfl'ANIf, .e lo+u uodirid~d 557~ a~ °0d S& B WVYS'1'MEN'1'S. 1.~C. ` Lake, as describad and cmveyed by Deed recoiding in 6ook •A' of Deeds, Page 106, and e 15 foot wide atrip of 1vM lying Northerly to and Wn+limy~au (imited l,iJ+ilitr Cm'P°1'7~ m lo m u°4""d`d 15~ io~'~: edjo3ning said 20 foot wide dttGi rlght of wny, as describod and ~ canvelfed bY Deed t'ecoided Sn Eook 173 of Deeds, Pege 410, in the IN CONSmEMTlON of Ten Dollo+s md othu valuable considenQon; Southeast Quarter of Section 19, ibwnship 25 North, Henge 45 Fast, H.M.; ~,~t;oq • . • . , In twid pni4 eonvey .nd wernn< <o DA1ISi llEVf1.OPDENT. 1NC, , W~ +P° EXCflFT existSng Counry Rond righte-of-weY.- : . • . . . . . the lnllowine deecrilx~! rcd atalc, situated in lhe Caunty of SpoYane. Sute of Wmhiaptnn: 1 Situate in the Counry of Spokane, Steta of Nashington. , • , . ' ' . A Portioc o[ lLe Swlhaul Run►ie* ot 9atlon 19, Ta.mhip 25 NoAh, IImp 45 'IbAt, . • . , • ` ~ W,hi,, lrng Narthetlp of the follo,.iaC denQibed laod , . , . 4052457 A drip of land 35 !al widG u{d 55 fod dcip o( lmd omc~ti+g of ~ 20 foot wida dildi h~ I al 1 riy~il of .ey daig tLe anuunl wuct of and n 6k foot .rid ~c etn~' d ~6~4et1 ~II, llll! I~ f~ p~ I~~i16119~ romraed in tboh'n' of tkeda Yece u0. p k~l ►rins N . ~n,~ S~roluY W, q . w nad edjoiniog mid 2.0 (oot widc ditcL righl of wey, d aoe=ibca ma convhea ►y n«a . . , • . , ~_..eea a owr 473 or Deeaa P-p ua, in Lhe swubc*A Quwtcr of s«+ioa 19, ' ' Toawhip ?S Norlh. Mnee 45 Y.-1), W.M.; wnacnnutne dw,„ttr : 960ppI is#4«n ICuri ' L%CF:PT cristing CaunlT ltaod rigiilro(-wa.; S~~Z . , ••__•_--_••__•llkicln'Ih nA*IJnu : . ' 'I~ r ~ . • • Etcise Tax Aald on iswe ud 4p c,~W . . . 5iloab iu Wc Couutr of SpokmS Slak olPlmhinctaa. ; Sele Mx. Pd. l~Q • . . rw . 8 'TOGtT11CRWR1ldILI+eimpravemrnsauWUrkttahatrtunloaUKpupcn~uwldla~aixtu~,~ijl,~~,►~unm+ncn.nN&.luue.u~l SUB,TECf'P~: ~wufU~/atrJnw~ctrye~IKrcliwulwhjal,h~rha~ialAcrljWgirtotrRiamllKltnkYioalknuiJ.[14rwARniel,wildlkrcnKni&. l.inbllity fw tlcal Frlnto Tua fw tu eetount no. 66104.0025. krcJllr~ry~,AFltlunlpirlkga AcMnrius nlnwrrluyy+MJnlnjwlaIlfiUwttiyYuruus anJcyuipnrNwAkdaRwwwm~y6crcalicr L ( f ' (CNrVIrYUiIK{Iq1Ya ~lYIUfHWRllrfly1f11rIMY1JIRyYD1[RKNIIAGIfWIMIWSI{Ij,buwqMuilimuint ptcgrmli~rdUrfuFwn9 2 linbiliiyforfu~womxnamrnuDyConoolitlalcdlrti~nlionD'utrklNo.lD. ~ wsll~lumM~,de~.U`luin~.4rix+ui~~.nl~i~ntiuf,rucudiiit.wt~a~l~li~int,rkranwdlililiit s~.uriW,fikianaadryul~iY+u: 1. liobi(ityforfuturedurgaleviedlrySPokenoCwntyforSlorwlVaterccrrice. alI CatNti. Plrl> thx-tI 4;'WPcwi11, 4ttl*. vttJ{Ii4YL. InhYUfs.Imluilf, iM[un'K, ftvwIb WJ sw11CR6wtJi; aII lulll-ln Y(ncl JiJhvWrcn. ' . 4. Fmemenl md lhe ternu isnd conditlau lhereof wilA Uu Grnnue, Peeifk SteleeTclephone rclripmiun AW akr aminres dl punitwnt, nhircu uiJ.r2IrotJC mJ Soy UJ dl RplatuhCal,, 6nkm1tnL inl wlemmiwl awk wiih • ~ nnJ Telrgraph CompenY, for tlu righl lo erect, and meinlain pe1e~ within the neceamry mpM-1 w anr uJ sA d un lapui4. +ll of rluch w;J Moycny,tutl he JKn,N W nnJuuu, Nn of uk ndiy. wiree and futurn lbtreon, Detcd Aprfl 19,1006, Rttotded biny 14,1806, undu llaording ' , 1996 ~ No, U2GOG. • ~ ' lioru tharrot wilh Ihe Cranlee, Millar A. Mo~nl TOSINNLu~ltr►IUbIftnN1~Ni~f1leia~kttdrcunwl~rnlArfbm~rn'4 n+eauid Novonbet 1 I b. Fsumenl end tho lcrm~ md tondi -7~~ ~ik«in-N~re'4inihKpriMiyluimd "'1W0 f4LttbAED 1111RIEf1l'~IOUS7VNID 711RfB NUNDRED MID i °r° PuY ~+►Y 213,3U0.00 huebnnd of Doru Morriwn deating in hii KPte Wa t, nnd Il A. Mortiwq - laJlat IS G wilh inltK+l UKrtw1 Unl Ihc puynteN u(ldI olhY wma riLh inurtu Ilrmn.wlrznceJ in yu9bend of Coyde M. Morrisoh deeGng in hia xparnte property, for lAe purpose of n xr&nbnehrrcWitLw{rnmikbetwuyufdiniktJufTnLu: lOlihepuftrrtumufihecovnmuwdApermnniofllwmrakrcina~n~ii►~1: ~ Perpetunl righlb!•rroy eaxmmt lo wrvey, tonullruti. operelt. insPeet, luaufta+i% a''d : . lel th rcr*)wcN uf anr (uwrc alruu.. wuh inuica thvan, wik As lknuwcr br lsnki iunuint ui rurvEr~ph?I herrnf Ikrcio'Iwiwr remwe e wakr pipeline or eondtil nnd appurknerrce► therclo, Daled Ociober 1, 180.5, AJrucei klJt ~apurardauii~7reiwiufWeuWiy~iKUainJclwnLca~rMtKrd'umiuru.lim'6fixNactruinytb.evKknCNOyir . xy (WhN . . , llecutJcJ (klolxr 22, 1066, undor llecorJinQ Na 1111008C, . dy( . LO 41r Nl1iI1rk816MU, fhklNYin. IfIY'w1I1 ul ~fPIaturc.u. 44 4`I IuV'W'M'M111 ~v 0. Agreanrcnl arid Uw icrnu did tuntlitloru Uwrcaf, Ttetorded AY"t 3. 1oO5, U71d01 arircwrw1.61heioraiirdurdiIra+rwi~Iri~ad~Yraw~l~ (uIC l,rualtu(<<LIk. &.Jr) ItecordingNaD508090116,ReyavdinelheSowerConnectlonAQrKroenttxlwecnS{wknna . ' County, lleptay md Dnluo Developmrnl, Lne, with lateeomcr Proriaiom. , Uirnn.aeurca+d.UwUunuwct it ljrfully kiw+li4ilKnuialrrcbr6.vnvcyel+n!lwUitripluwgnpwlcnavrytlKF'nMcny.ihr t. ik{lupenyi.unercwulria6wlilWUanuwerriltr+rtmnnlJefnJrnimllrAKiide iuthHiKrnyaFaiauiUeluinuuJJenuny..whp+t • ' . IDiIlydltilYIDl[W4[atnrlYlOftNIH7kM4Il1W NIK1oj1tICYICLRPIJNWMUyjGU1NY l4kIq7YtuXtlpllN7uuWinjUnM'.incrcQ DalodUW~.dayo( NQVE,~ 109Q JAY INVF.S1'MENT COifi'ANY ~ ~ , . ~ ~ • ~ . . ~ • i , , ! ' ~ • / ~~~.f," (.c-c ,1.~.~.~' • ' , ~ ' . ~ ! ~ • ~ ~ ` • . . til , ~ . , . C}WtD 1!. JM~~II~~,,99 . , 1i L JARy15 . , ; . . . ` L . UT ou~M[r.NqM~wnASfin~~ : . , , , . , ; G~ , • . ' . , . . . ~ . . ~~y ~ . , ~~_~y ~ ~ . , _ . ~ . . : . x~ . . , ?-7 I A052458• • , //AFPCR AECORDlNC bWL'I'0: I+ ' fiSr I el 1 Pded for fCceorJ et Iiequnt of , . S'HUVi{ENBOIZ & ROHIL PLL.C I U10611995 01;79P ' J. . . 14701 E. NO[tA . INNJiSSIG114a1, IUl I~S W~I, 19,00 Spotur (o, R SPO ~ AFYERRECO1tDWCMN,LTO: , '05241, RSW►~E.1VA ~J9210 . TIlUNKENBOLZ & ROM P1.LC IAUUW Ifg, IIIIE n f0 n II10611996 009P ' . E.12704 NORA . 116.00 *1,m !o, a •JI fI '~C:JCy D E E D o r r n u s T 9POIWJE,1yA 09410 (For ku' In lha elnte of WeAungton only) 19N*l?7 Jn J~„"a~U 9U!lpROlNAT10N AC1tUJMt:N1' '7 T1i19 DEED OFTIiU9T, made tlJe,fM, dey of NOVBM1311$,,1906 belween NO'I1CE: 'M.4 9UDO1t0INA770N ACREEhF-NT IlE3ULT9 IN YOUR SECUNIY 1NTE[iES7'9IN T11E PROPEiCfY . ' DEOOMWCSUB~TEC'f''OANDOP1AWElIP1tI0IiI'IYTHANTIIELIYNOPSOME07'flEftORLhT£RSECU1tffY ~flhS D~;VF.LAP~fEN ,T R~IC,• A W~.+hin o rnoretiory CINN1'OR, INyTpUKWr, • • ' who3e eddresf it _&,J2720 Suile D. Snoknne 1, VA 20216 • , ;1Te wderoigmed rubordinata end ovncr errca w followc jrnnsnm4riw Title ln+urnnrr Camn f,v. A 1Vwhinrtoa Carnornlion , TRUS7'EE, . ' an.r. i~v iNVFS'i'1fENT COMPANY. L Il/,Rp p JARV15 d 11 U'I7~ L~1 us d nnd WfG n+ Io whou edJress 6 N. Arronne Ild Smwnne. WA D0212 , ' nn undivided ~ Inurest and S& n IMIyF,~S I'},IFN'I'S.4L,C.. n lYwhin an miled Linbilltv Cnm env.es lo nn wdivided . 7_ 11'h intcresl. refernd W herein as 'eubwdiru+lar', b lhe owner and holder of e ptrd of 7'wl detcd „flwen,¢~S! nnd ~JI )ARD [l. ,IARV~~nd RUTII f,, JAflV15. liu ld nnJ 1Yfr. dll~~Y 1NVES7'MFti9' 'Y. n~ 1o nn wl~ieh b rcoorded in Volume psCe ,1 ~er wditor i fJe No.2y rceordi of ~,aohnnq Cuunty, wldrL un d 'Iniq{qst nnd S b D INVES'I'NIENT9,1A(',. n}YNhNicton Limilyd bil(Iv Gonmnnv. nj io nn unJiviJrd enaunben property daxribed in Exldbil'A'. . ; i • 406 4nkercs4, llENEFI,CWIY, wlioec addrew b,2507 9. Stnrlielit l.erte. VerodnJ,r,`W.A !KJUn, 1 1YluHfNCTON TRU9T f1ANK e We.+hlnptoa Cnmorollon, rofened lo hertln a+9ender', U lhe ovmer md holder r~c~}j; Grenlor Iieretry bergelru, aclle end canveys lo Trwlet in lnul, wilh power of snlq lhe followinQ dcxriLed of e Deed of Twl dakd Nwemlxr kJ~ exeeutcd by , DANAf DFVELOP,~MEN7'. L'C~~ ( ~vton Canoo wulw ' reel propcrty In SPOKANE County, lYmlwigton (which b raorded In volumc_,,,, pnQe , undtr wdilar i fJe No, ~ A Porlioa of thc $oullimd QueAe► o[ 4eriinn 12 T lyin~ NorUur~y nf U~a • ' ' (ollowing Jenafbctl fantL• y, bANM DE~I,QPDif.NT.1NC.. nferted to hero3n u'wmer', b the owaer of ~ll the roe1 property dencribed In Ne mortpgo IdentUled eEwe ln Peregreph 2 Aotrip of Innd SS fat widc, eaid SS I'ool rlrip of land mnueliag of e 20 fool wide dikh rigbl of any nloog the mlunil ouUet • . of Selte3e Lnic~ m deeaibed anJ oooreyed be Dccd..... ~cd'w Dook'A' of lleedy Fege 100, nnd e 16 foot wide etrip of l. !n ~rulderetion of benebUto'rubordinetor Gom'ovmeP, rcceipl nnd nilfaaxy of which u hereby eeknowledged, lend lying Northvly io md 4aning eeid ?A fooL rride diteL right of weJ, na deeaibed and aomqed by Deed Jed in end to iaduce'lender' to adrutte fundr wder iLs morlen¢e md ell egreement+ in conoatioo therowith lhe'"'ti°rd"'°tor' Ibok 473 of C3ecd.~ Pege /10, in Uie 9oulDees! Querter of Sactioo 19, Tm.a~hip ?S Norl~ Jtange.~5 F.ut, WM; doa herebr wcondlt{onelly aubordinate liie Gen of hle owAQege ldentilied in Perogreph 1 ebove to lhe Utn of'lender'e ~x~ r~,,,,~r ,;d,,,~-W,,Y s~~~ u~~ c«~tr or s~o~oe, Sw,e af Wrulungwa mortQeQe, ldentjfitd in Pengreph 1abwe, and ~I advenea or ciwges mede or accruing tlmrowdv, indudinQ any exlaulon at rcnewol tAercof. Not to ezceed 7'Wo HundretLTwentr 71iousnnd end Vo•daL' , which rcnl properly 6 nol uaed pruxipnlly (or egricvllurnl or ferming purpoees, logelhtr wilh nll lbe lrnemenls, . ' hrredltamenls, nnJ nppurtenances now or hereeller therewdo belonging or in eny wise epperl~sirwig, and Ute rents, issucs, 5. It b wderol.ood be the perUee hercto 11mt I,ender wwld not mahc lhe loen ~etured by ►he mor~gnge in Peregroph nnd profil~ lhereof. afje wllhoul lhu eCreemenl. ' This deed G for the purpo.+c of eecvring pertorrtwiee of eecl~ egreemrnt of Crenlor tKreim mnlnined, end ~+eyment of Uie 0. Lender agrx~ lo prwide to 9ulwrdLmtor a aopy at eny No~ke of Default or my ot6er noliee ~iven ~o Ownnr oum of One I lundred Foriv Tliouxnd nnd no/Ion DoWva (f,~/0.D00.QQ ) wilh inlcrca~ {n nctordanet wit1i lhe letnu of pununnl b lhe lerau of lhe Deed of Tnut daerlbed in paregraph 2 above, Qd eccordence With ItC1Y 6124.040, rcqunt e prom'iswry nale of eren Mle herewilli, ynynble lo Dcneficinry or order, nnd mnde by Crmitor, nll rcnewolx, moJifrc~tinn~, ^ u hereby made by the $ubordinelor lhnl e topy of eny 'Notlcc of Tw1ee's Snle' under the Lmder'i Deed o! 1lrust nnd utenaions thcre0f, mlJ nlw suxli Grct6er iums N nNy Ua nJrniueJ or IonncJ by DtncGeinry lo Crmdor, or nuy olhcr detcribad in Peregraph 2 abwe be mailed lo SuLordinelot ~ lht (oUowing eddred+, ur el eudi oUur addres~ e+ SutwrJuNlor suansore or nuigm, logelhcr with lnlercal lLrroon al audi role m dull Ee agrcal upoR nby ~irat In ~•dAn~ lo Lernler. , To liratal llia eecuritr of tIlla lloed of'fnul. Crmlor rnvennn4 nnd egrean: dny fnraetment Canlany . S& D lnveatmeuli. LLG 1. To ketp lhc property in good tonJilion enJ repair, to permil no wmin lhereol; lo rnmplcle my buUdLtF, alruclure • 45019. SInrU~lil laie or improvanent bcui~ bu(It or nlrout to bo 4uill U%trton; to .eet4te Pr~mpuy ~r euva;oF, druelwt, ot 'vnprovcmenl Vernd~Je,1YA t10037 tltereon whicli nmy te denwgeJ or deaUoyed; end lo eomply wilh ell lewti oriWuixq regulnUom, eovcnanu, mrtdilioits, nnd reslrittioru nlTatinQ Uie properiy. 7, 'lhe ovmer end l.ender Agree lo eomply wilh lhe Arlkle 1 of the Subordinntor's mortgoge dexribcd in Peregreph 2, To pey befae delinquenL nll law(ul taan and weasmeau upon lhe propert}; lo keep Ihe property Gee and deer 1 w euc6 prori+iam ayply b Iwlh lhe Owner md Lender euacyurnl b Uu aecvlion af thi+ 3ubordinaUon Agrccmrn6 of dl olher charga, Geru, or encwnbroneee impeiring lhe eeewity o! Uus Deed of Tnul. 3. To kcep nll buUdinge now on c~reeIler crccled on lhe property dexribed hcreim m~linuou~ly uuured egnlnst los~ . 8. 71+ehe'vq edmIitietreton, au'tgro and aaes+on in lntaet of lhe'subordirulor' elull be bowd bY lhG egreemenL try fue or olher Imwds in an amount iwt Iw Uwn lhe lotal debl eeGued by Uue Deed of Trust. All policice el~ell lx held 1Vhere the word'martgoge' nppeen 6enin it ~hell be cansidemi es'deed of twl', end gtnder and number of pronoun~ by lhe DeneGcinry, end be in aucli mmpenies as dte Aeneficiury mey approve end luve 1ox+peye6le fval to lhe llenefidary, considered lo mntorm w undenigned. , ns ib Imeresi mey eppenr, end then lo Uie C rantor. The emowt coflaled undcr eny iivurence policy mey be eppGsd vpon eny indebledncss hcreby eecured ln eueh orJer e+ lhe IItnefeinry e}dll dttermint. $uch eppGrslion by llie liendrinry Esauled lhis dey of JJovember ,1A_,1Q. . e1in11 not ceux diuonlinuance of eny praeedingi lo finecloot tlu+ Deed o( Twl In Uu cvenl o( foreclaaurc, nll righti , ~ • o( lhe Crnntor in inaurence polieies Oien in force ehall pw to lhe purc}ieser at Uu foreclosure eale. NpR'I(F; Till3 SUBOIIDINA710N AC(IEEMEN7' CON1'AIN9 A PIt0Y1StON PlmCH AI1AW9 TlIE PPJiSON : To de(end my ection or proceeding purporiing lo atTal the eecurily herrof or the righU or powcn o! ikncfidary . OHLICATE9 ON YOl71t REAI, PROPP.R7'Y SY.CUfIl1'Y TO OB'fAIN A IAAN A YOILTION OF WMCH 2dAY 13E or 7lwlee, and to pey ell cmts end expensw, including ea+L of GUe searsh nnd elWrne7's fees in e rwanable amow4 in . PJQ'ENDED FOtI 0'17m11 PURPOSE9 TQ/W IbtPItOVEMEN!' OF TIQ,' LAND. Tf 19 ItECOb4+ENDED TILAT. m y tuch ection or proceeding, nnd in my swl Drouglit by Fieneficiary b foralox Uw Deed of Trwl ''~R , PRIOB TO TQE BXECU770N OF TIfl9 SUBORDINA770N ACREP.hENf,'f1IE PAItT[FS CON8l1LT Wr'li Tg ' A''OllNEY9 WiTI{ SESPECT TllL'AL~PO. . ' , ' . 5. To Pey ell coeu, fea and erpenam im mrinectian wiUi thG Decd o!'lmwl, inctuding the eipenxs of the Truel,ee • . , innLrred in enfortinQ lhe abGgation secued henby end Tnulee's md nttorney's fca aetunlly incwred, d provided Lr . JAY INVESI'MEM' COAPANY , ' . . . • atatute, , 6, Should Crantor (ail lo pey when due nny luea euatmenta iruuM„r. ~.•mt~~T• • 1 1~.~ ~ . . `1 ~ • ~ 4087934 ~ ?OD ~ PiSt: ! ol 1 0311611991 03:I5P ' faliSltl Gk, llE NS CO GS {II,W Spoltnt W, A 4087934 ' Pig~: 1 of 1 ~A 0li, IIL 'i WElS ~ ~1~6(1941 QJ;1~ Filed at the Requeat of: ~11,00 fpclNt fa~ q The utility linee are to be placed in the general location ee TRUNKEN80L2 6 AOHR, PLLC. , Attorneye at LnW ' ie ehoun on the map nttached ae gc,iibit •9•, which is incorporeted E. 12704 Nore heroin by this reference, however the exact plACement of the . Spokana, wA 99216 • utility lineu may vary alightly due to the aubaequent directione 3 COUa~ p~ S RI~RECORpIIl0 SEHER AND UTILITY LINE P.nSEHENT from and regulationo oi Spokane County concernfng the platted of ' -7 Second Party'e real property naw owned or heraafter ecquired. , FOR TIlE M1TUAL DENEFITS 1'0 BE DEAIVED HSABBY, the receipt and . eufficiency of which ie heraby expreaely ecknoaledged, the The Ensementa, righte and obligatione created and grnnted , GRANTORS, SALTESE S'QDICATE LLP. herein zefetred to as "5alteae", ~ Aerein nre gzanted for the benefit and burden of the partine and • g„nd HII.I,AR HORAISON. II, heroln ret=red to' ae property atated above, and their heire, uuceeeeoro or neaiqne, and "Mozriean', and hereJ„Mfter knowq ae "Wet Pnrtiee", ehall run with the lnnd perpetuelly, except ne atnted above. , do hereby grent tot ~ GAANTEES, R'chl crd 6. Jnrvig and Ruth L. Jarvie. fluoband npd W1,Le_,, ~ ~ d/~(,q~7ev Invae n~g~,it CoQaany`Dahm Davelonmant. Inc.. n " ~buari Dated thie ~ day of ~a~► , 1996. ~ waehina,Lon corporntion,,_ Heridien Lnn,cL, I,_.L.C. , a ~ ' washinaton Limited Liebility CQmpe_nv eqd S 6 B I ~nveotmente. L,L.C „ n Waehlnaton Limited Llablll.tv GRANTOItS/PIRST PNtTIES ComDailY, hezeafter Isp,own au 'Second Partiee', a permanent, exclueive ;aeeement, Thirtv (301 feet in width, MILLAIt HOARISON, II over, acrose and under tha Piret Pazty'e reel property, LEG11L, A_nortion__g,f a etrj,o of lepd 30 feet w d h. SQ 1/4 Sec,14,ff.25N,,_t.4SC., w,kiL, SALTESE SYHOICATE, LLC . ` PARCEL ND.'A Poction oP 55194.9025 (complete legel doscribed on _Exhibl.t "A:_ attnched hereto and incorporated hezein; by thie reference, in tha locntion BY= desczibed/ehoun on Exhibit •B_ etteched hereto). r'"• • LOGAtJ H./JORCEN , M agin member ' S ✓ This eaeement ehall\ be for the inetallation, repair, By: maintenAnce and replacement of varioue utility linen, including but TbOMAS S. S14ITli, ?ianaging member not limited to n eewer lino by Second Party or aseiqne thereof, with ingreee, egresa and acceee thereto during conetruction, GRANTCBS/SBCOND PAATI@S: ' maintenance and replecement periode. Durinq the conetruction peciod, not to exceed _TWO (7)monthe, the eaeement £or inqreen, egceaa and ecceee over the above deacribed property ehall be coneiderad to be up to FIFTY f501 feet ln vidth, but ahell zeduce RICNAAD B. JAAVIS dL /~'~,{JAY INVESTMENT CONPANY automatically to the vidth eteted in the firet paragraph above, ~ upon completion of inetallation. Second Partiee ehall eleo be ' . reeponsible for reotoring the eurfaee of the ground ae nearly ae • possible to 1te origlnal condition upon completion and prior to , H L. S d b a JAY INVESTMENT COMPANX expization of the construction period. , . ' • . R. E. Ex e Tax Exempi . 1 0 a19_Gh~II • 2 ty Treas. yl~ . , 1 I ~ 4087934 Piqr S of i 00f26119V W;15? 4087934 , fM ION, Ilf IYS (D US , ~il.l) Spotu~ Ca,, Q... . ~ P~~e 1 tl 1 ?,XHIBIT •e•, ~ 03I26J1941 43,I7 ~ RUsPA o1, i ys ro us , s~i,a s~t~~~ ca, ~ (~P/ Leqal for Haenmentl ' EXIIIBIT "A• ~ , ~ . (Legal for 8urdened Property) . .f , ~ r7~_ • ; LEGAL DESCRIPTlON ~ Scwer Eascmcnt for Sallun Lake OuUct Crossing ~ 1, CL Or W~Ot fm~ ASCuENt FOR My ponion of a strip of land 30 fcet in widlh in Ihe Southcast Quarler of Section 19, T.25 N., stwtn caossmc I ' RAS E., W.M., lying wilhin the below d~s~nbed Percel "A", the ctnterline of said 70 foot widc strip being described as loliows; bt,~s 1~ ' Baginning at the Noct'®R Comcr oiuid Soulheasl Quaner, lhcnce S.89°46' 12"E. a distance or 233,08 fect 1o the TRUE PO(NT OF DCGINMNG or this ccnterline descnplion; thence S.27°53 '24"W, e distence or 53 4,05 fcct lo the west line'of said ~ A Soulhea:l Querter and temtinuj point o[Ihis ttntciline dtscriplion; Cc ; r ~T I I j . I At Siluato in Ihe County o! Spokane, Slate olWasNngton. I ' ~ ~ • • PnRcEL„A" ~~~,.►r~ ; ' Metes and Dounds Descriplion o[Saltese Lnke Outlct A strip of land 35 feat in width in ihe Soulheast Quarier end the East ]]0,00 fcet of the Nortli I I ' Helf or lhe Southwest Quartcr, all in Scction 19, T.15 N., R45 E., W.M., said strip lying 17.50 'fcet on each side of tho following ducribed centerline: I ~ ~ • 8eginning at e point on the eastuly linc of said Southeast Qunner whieh bcars I ICID . ! S.00°00'00`E. a di:tence or 1173.32 feet from the Nonheast Comer of wid Southcast Querter, lhena N.61°2234'W, a distence oYT7i:5? fcct; th4nce N.68°Sb'S9'W, a distanca of'l5,5`0 feel; thence N.70°26'57`W, a dislence of104.$9 fcet; thence ' + I I D N.11°37'08"1V, e-dislnnce or 118 feet; thcnee N.74°49'00"W. a distance oCO'fl.J,81 fee • thence N.64°42'36`W, a dislena of 1h93 fec(; thence N.60°02'20'W, a distance z , of 206 fee1; thrnco N.75° IO'19'W, a distence or 121,07 (eet; thence N.61°07'17"W, I I m e dislance or 1~39 fecr then e TI,65°SO'01'W, e distance of T~,14 fect; lhcncc , N.62°12'SS'W. a cit slenu of 19 feet; thenee N.56°15'34'W. a distanee of S&~TB` feel;,thcnce N,37°01'51`W, e distnnce of 9.5 feet; thencc N.42°14'40'W, a distence ' a or ~s~ mne sre~v I I • Of SALIES[ U1E DUTLET of 56N feet; Ihence N.54°35'33`W. a dislanee of 5312 fett• thence N,61°21'42W. d (17.51 rir et 17.51 HILY) distencc or 70,92 tat; lhence N,54°69'47`W, n distena of 92.02 tcet; thence N,55°J7'S I'W. e distance or 101,70 leet; Ihence N.58°01'27"W. e distenct of 101.62 ~c-; j'r ~ I • 930.00 feet of 6he Norih half of the~Southwcst Quarter, ebeing the ~tertnin s po nt of this r ~ unlerline descriplion, whieh terminus point bears N,89 47'l1 •W, a distance of 35.51 1 ~~y , I~ I~------ ' feet from the Center 114 Comer or seid Sation 19; Ihe sideGnes of said strip being exlended or shonened to meet said norih line of said East 330,00 fect of the North Half of Ihe Soulhwcsl Quener. I I ~ EXCLPT any ponion lying within Derker Road, w Cat -n .o•"Y i. ~ r - • Situale in the Couuly of Spoknne, State of Wnshinglon, 1' ~ 300' I I I • ~ k r0 ' »ue ° BARKER ROAD ~'s'•.to,rr... ' ~V"" ~ ~/L.LAN4S~ ~ EXPIRE9 12/71 ~ , 5 4 ' . .St..~.~ '.5" . . . , l ' • • C , t•••':,~:. .Y;:I~.•.✓.; ":'/i"'^~' . • ~ ' ^ • i . • . • E .t•`''~; • '~t:~.;''•: } . . . . , , . t«r: ! . . :i. . • ' - • '.,4.•. • : V...•. :'.J.•:.:` J:.• 2 . . j . ~M1,. ; .Iti % . •l': i • ' . ~•t.~ . . ' ' . . , i. :1',~~~':.. ~a•• , . . . • , . . • • i: • ' . . ~ . ' . . ~~'.fl' i~•~ . . . 1 . . . •.4, . 1 ' ' ,I: :t' . . . • . ' . , _ :a' :i.'' • . . r . " 'f.'. . , . .i::Y: :v • ~ . . . • . . , • • " '7TIi~'i•' ~ t~•• . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ : l , , . . . . . . . . . . ( 95 0674 950803(~115 YOI. ~ 75 iPdGE 177 13 • SEWEA CONNBCTION AGREElCM'T BEZWEEN SPOICANB COIIN't'Y, HEPTONS ~ AND_DAFIIK_2SVRLOPME2U. I2,;'.,,,_ WITH LAT£COMER PAOVISIONS . ~ THIS AGREEMFNT ie.. made and entered into thia ~ day of - ` August, I995, b.y and between Dahm Development, Inc. (hereinafter I^ •Dahm"), a Washfngton corporation, with oEficee at Suite 215, South ~ 11J 104 Freya, Spokane, Waehingion, 99202; Clara A. Hepton, a eingle peraon; the Testamentary Trust of Virgil J. Itepton, dated January i ~ i 3, 1977 ihereinafter "Neptone"I, a duly organized truet under the I ~ ~ laws of the State of Washington; and Spokane County (hereina[ter ~ w "County"), a political subdiviefon of the State of Waehington, with offices at W. 1116 Broadway, Spokane, washingCOn. .3 ; ~ . $~-C I T A L S ~ ' A. Pursuant to the px'ovisions of chapter 36.94 RCW, Spokane ' ~ County has the power to conatruct, operate and maintain a aystem of ' 7Z sewerage within Spokane County. B. RCW 39.94.190 authorizes counties to contract with , . private parties in and for the establishment, maintenance and i operation of all or a portion of a eystem of eewerage. C. Chapter 35.91 RCW authorizee Che County to contracC with i ownere of real estate for the conetruction of public aewerage I ~t facilities and to provide-for the reimbursement of auch ownere, on ~ a fair pro rata ahare baeis, by the ownere oP real eatate wko d!d v ; not contribute to the originaZ coet of such facilities and who . ! • ~ aubsequently tap into or use the eame. i D. Dahm own5 39 acrea of land located along the sauth eide i , . ~ of Eighth Avenue between Barker Road and Long Road, described more ; particularly on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated by a PAC$ - 1 . . i • : . , r• ' • . • . , . • . . , : t;'~:•::•";'~;~~~ . . . . . , . . ~ ~i . . , ':1,~ ':1' . . ~l. . . . i.. . . !7 i.".. ~ : . •1 1 . .1•.•. 1 ' . l,: :'7', 1'. •1i' . •t '.1'. ,•4~ • i . . ~ . • ' I• ~~7. . . , •:1~; . . .7• . • L: , , . ' . . • 1 ~ • ' • ' •'i'. . Y.•. y , : . .•J:• . t . , . . . :'l+. . . • r:' . :ii. . . . . 's'• ',f~: ~:'r•'• • . . . , . . a.f' • . :.t~ :•i:.'~ a' . , ,•i: , . J i••.' . . .'i . . Y• . . . . . . . '•f , . . . . . . . .'t~ . . . ~.~J.:LY: . ~ . t. . . •t': . . . . . . . . . . :~i.. . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . r . o.:.i.~: ~~4i.. . . . . . . . . . . ' . i. . . . , YOI. ( 7 ) 1.3 PAGEI7 8 U VOI. ( 7 )JPAGE17rf 11 intereat ("Latecomer Fee■) to the County before connecting said , reference. properCy to the Facilities, plus-an 'adminietrative char e' e al I 9 ~ j E. Dahm also owns 76 acree of land located approximately one to tive percent (S V) of euch fee-(ueed by the County ta defray the mile east of Sullivan Road and one-third of a mile north of 32nd coet of ite servicea including bookkeeping and accounting); ' Avenue. In 1994, Dahm was given preliminary plat approval to i provided, the Eollowing properties shall be exempt from such ~ divide said land under Spokane County Planning Department File No. paymente: . , PE-1724-93. A portion of the preliminary plat, known ae (1) propertiea owned by Dahm; "Morningside", received final plat approval in 1994. (2) Lote 1 and 4, Block 1; Lots 1, 3, 41 and 5, ' F. Heptons own Lote 1 and 4, Block 1; Lots 1, 3, 4 and 5; Block 2; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; all in Meadowview Ranch Block 2; and Lote 1 and 2, Block 3, Meadowview Ranch Estatee, Eatates; and recorded at Page 58, Book 21 of Plats, Auditor's No. 9309290070, (3) the property deecribed on Hxhibit 'B"; records oE the Spokane County Auditor. b. The Latecomer Fee and adminietrative charge shall be G. Neptone a1BO own additional land, more particularly paid in addition to all other eewer charges lawfully imposed by the described on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated by County pureuant to reeolution or ozdinance. ~ , reference, which land comprieea a part oE the original preliminary c. The County shall have the eole and exclueive plat of Meadowview Ranch Estates, Planning Department File No, PE- •authority to detexmine what properties in addition to those ~ 1644-91. Heptons are seeking final plat approval ta divide eaid ~ properties which the County is herein required to reaerve capacity land inCo 18 eingle Eamily lots. for may tap into or use the Facilitiee. H. Dahm deeiree to deeign, construct and inetall certain d. The Latecomer Pee for a particular latecomer property public eewerage facilitiee, hereinafter reEerred to as the shall be determined by multiplying the Facilities Cost ae defined "Facilities", that will enable or facilitate connection of certain below by the ratio of the number of ERUs of the latecomer property properties owned by Dahm and Heptons to the County'e general divided by the total ERUe oP capacity in the Facilities, as aewerage eyeCem. Heptons and Dahm intend or have entered into a eetimated by the County Divieion of Utilities, plus interest at the eeparate agreement not invol.ving the County to finance the initial rate ot four percent (4 t) per year calculated on the basis of a cost of the Facilities. 365 day year commenc:Lng from the date the Facilities are accepted , I. The Facilities generally include the installation of an Por operation and maintenance by the County. ' - eight inch public eewer line extending south from the County's PaOB - 8 , • •.'~~7.~::~:• ~ • . ' •.1'~' . ~ , • ' I ~ ' ' ~t . • ~:y~•;' ,.1' T . I . ~ . . • . . l . .L i. . , ♦ i~. ; • ~~ti:. , . ' . t'.~ . . • ~ . • . • ..'i . :2' . . . ~ . . . , . . , , . ~ . •J. ~ ~ < : •'~i . •~i~' 1 ~ . . . • ~ . • ti'. . : \ I :'Y.• : i'•. . , . .a~• . t' . 1' . . . ~i , . . . . . , ~ t: , . ' . . . , . ~ . . 'f•' . , ~ ,:`~~r~..:;~~ . . ' ' . ..i ~ . . . . . ~ , . ~ti .•1'. •.i . I . :~';.;.:`:.,L::.~~~•~~•.~ '~t' . i~•~.'~ . ' . . . , • . . . . . . . . ~1 . EXHIBIT "A" Y01. 1 ! ) (~h~~ ~ r! 89 95 0674 17 S 1 PhGE 4 7 9 0 ' EXHIBIT '8' ~ , 1NnT PORTION OF THE SE. 1/4 OF SEC110N 19, T. 25 N., R. -45 E,, w.M. IN 71qE A porllon oJ the .routlrwur quartcr o/ Secdon :0, To+4-itsh1p 15 Norrli, Rmpgc 4s F.nsi COUNTY OF SPOKMJE, STA1E OF WIISHINCION LrNG NORTI{ERIY 0F 1HE FOILOWING 5poko►ie Counry, Washlnstai, more parncutorly de.tcribecl as jo!low,r: QE$~IP OF LAND 35 ~'EE~' WIOE, SND 35 FOOT STRIf', OF WJD CONSIStINC 0~ A ZO FOOT WlOE OITCH RIGHT 0F WhY ALONG TNE NATURAL bUTLET OF 5ALTESE LAKE, , AS DESCRIBED /WD CONVEYED BY DEED RECOROEO IN BOOK 'A OF DEEDS, pAGE 106, Commtnclt►g af the iiorl1rwcs1 r.ortier nj me soudM'uv quarler, thencc Fi4ST alOllg fhC 1iafllr SOUTN 1S.00 jec<<o apoint c+n the sourh tight IN SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINCTON, AND n 15 FOOT WID~ STR1P 0F LJ~ND LY1N(; NORTH- Jn*c of the soutlnve.tl quarrer 70U,00 fre~ rhence . ' oI way IUit,0J'811i Avenue cuid1rhe PObYf oJQEGlNNI,VG, thrnce eanririiring ,SOCIT11 15101 ERLY TO AND AOJOININC SAID 20 F40r WIOE DITCH RIGHT OF WAY, AS DESCRIBEA AN • CONVEYED BY OEEO RECORDED IN BOOK 473 OF DEEDS, PAGE 41D, IN SPOKANE Jeer, thapice S 14°O!'13" fl' 350.80Jeer, rhl:~ce S'65°38'47"'E 30.19 jccr, rhrrrce ,S 1-1°O!' COUNTY, WASHINGTON, IN THE SE. 1/4 OF SECTION 19, 70w~ISH1P 25 NORTH, RNlGE 13" W 181.12 feer, thcnce Nd3°19'O3" ii' 34.61leel,lhcd4'e N 65"53'47" N 49I,48 (~~tr W a 45 EAST, WILWMETfE! MERIDiAN, EXCEPT EXIS'iING COUNTY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAYS. potnt on the east rlght of ivay line oJQarker Rond, t'r,ancr N D°;1'13" if' 42$..~6/~'et-rv apoir►! on the sourh rrglit o/way line o/Sth Avemse, ►hcnce L,9.ST a1ong Ih-- sonlb tfvht of way fine of , 8th Avenue 669.95 fcat re the TOINT oj BEGLN~1'IA'G. k Caitalning7.S5SAcres. . / . ! . ~ ~ . , . ~ ~ , . . I . • • . , . . . . ~ . , , . ' ~ ~ ~ , 41 ~ . . , . . :.i•• , . , . . . •i , :t'. tii'•'. •:i . t . . ~ •~5•~ , .4. . • 'ry: . . ' r• . . . ~i . i • , :1.:', . . . . •1~~:;',; . . . • , r."•:' . •~:i:' . ~ "i.' . . , , j~~. . ..j. . „ ~:1~•.; ~ : i'~ ' ~ f•:';.';.: . . i: .t . ' • • , , ti.. i: . . . :'u: . . . . ~ , . . . i ^2~ . . . . . ~ . • :G'.': ~ • ~ •:M: . , . , . ~ . . ~ ~ , ~ j ~ . , ' • • . . . . . .~f~J~:L•.~~:A'.~1... . ~ . ~ . , . . . . . ' ~ . , . . . ~ . . . . . ' , ' • . ~ , ~L~..r1 . ~ ' ~ . . . 95 0674 Yol. ~ 75 ~~ACE 17 912 ~ vo~. 17 5 ss 0e74 5 PacC, ~ c. + EXHZBIT OCR :(Paqe 2 of 2) ~ EXHTBIT "CII Parcel Number 55203.0401 " Parcel t~umber 551e7.90oi s~ x5~s~sE rrL f-57- p~P ~/W _x~~yo7 55203.0402 MEA~oo~JtllEw Rq~vcN ~s7s, ~ 7~ 55184.4002 S5'/ 9 WS0 55203.0903 oF SW S_ o ' 55203.0404 Parcel Number 55191,2101 S'10-loY7 7~1 55203,0405 ' 55191.0407 55203.0406 55191.0413 55203.0907/ • 55191.0414 ~ " ' S5203.0501 5S203.0502 ' 55191.0409 ` 55203.0503 M~~~ E~ EsrS• l' SlZ 55191. 0410 ~ 55203.0504 55191.0612 55203.0505 55191.0617 ~ 55203.0601~ 55191.0624 . . 55203 , 0602 RArxH E S7S. /-2 /3 55191. 0623 55191.0625 Parcel Number 55203.91055-5`20 ~?y03 55191.0626 ~ 55203.90199-y_20 Nj75~ yQ3 ~ 55191,0674 55191.06)5 55191.0632 55191.06)6 CO~e~~ TO ~EF~IV/~C.~2LrS k~ b~Z(.o 55141.0637 • 55191.0619 • X ~~,a' 55191.0628 ~ Parcel Number 55192.0101 M4n1i(4~~ ~''`'~ES N~ ~50 1~ 55192.0102 5, SO X)0-fr fZL . 55192.0114 55192.0117 55192.0112 , ~ x z 55192.0111 • 55192.0344 • 55192.0343 55192.0713 • 55192.0320 ~ 55192.0314 4Di) (,07 ~0 55192.0321 • • 55192.0323 ~ 55192.0324 'S5192,2106 ~ . 55192,0779' ~ 55192.9020 5'5--/9 I SLS~ /l~~ 1~~I g ~ Parcel Numbez 55202.0264 J Pr 8?-579 7/-tq ~ 55202.0265 " " 7rB • ~ ~ 55202.0231 ; 55202,OZ)0 ~ . • ' ~ 55202.0241 Parcel Number 5518].9001~SPt A~g0v ~ 07 , -55184.9002 s £ S,af CHS7 55184.9007 b 55184.9003A SS 6Sa ~f S~ ~ : ~xr, .E.3oJ er(, 0.1560 PaCCel Humber 55194,9025 5- 5"-/5 17/ ' . page 1 of 2 A strip of lw-od bcinP, that, portion of the Ej~,UE} of SecLion 19, Tor+nehip ~ f 25 1lorthp Rary;o 1~5 F~est, Willemotto Heridlan, 1,Ying nn oither side of the ' . IRiIiED STA'E9 / centerline as eubsequontJy deucribed and included batwean two 1Saies , . DEPAR'fISEPif OF THE IMfERIOR ~ patallel to thd centerline, eaid oenterl]iu~ nnd parellel lines extendl,ne . BORFAU OP RF~LJ~iATION ~ n o W, to.and beiny, limited I,y the Southerlq line of a 20 foot xide dltch right • ~K. ~ • Q of v~, aa doecribed in deed recorded in Book "A" of Deads, page 106, in . • , 9poiuine Vnlley Pro~~ct, uiah7ngton v 8paknne County, Washington, ard the Northerly line of a 15 foot strip Q of land lying northerly to and adjoining eaid 20 foot aride ditch right ' CONTRACT A}D ORAMf OF I•'ATER PIPELTNE " of vwj,, as deacribed in deed recorded in Baok 473 of Deeds, page 410,- , • A in Spokane Countyp Washington, said parallel liaes lying 20 feet dietant . on either side of, meosured at right angles to the folloxing described . . ~ ~ oanterline: iHI9 CON'iR1CT Alm 6RANf Op F,A9@{F?R# made this ; dlz dq ~I • ~ . Beginning at a point on the West line of the E~+~SEI of said of ;~(..c.~~,c~i:,~•~ 1~;"in purruanee of;-the •et of Jtme 17, 1902 ~ Sectioq,14,,973 feet~ more or less, south of ttie Northxest ' corner of t1~e EJ3;1SE9 of said Section 19} said poinE being (32 Stat. 388), ard acte unendntorf thereof or eupplementarq thervto, located on the Southerly l.ir» of faio aoove oaid 20 foot dltch ' . _ right of xay; theroe north a distance of 38 feet, more or between TRB UNTM,STATE9 DP AHFAIDA, heninafter styled the Dnited 3 leas, to the Northerly line of the abwe said 15 foot strip ~ of lend lying northerlp to and adjoi,nfng the 20 foot ditch Stetes, repheaented by the oflicer execvtiag thir contract, und right of wV. ~ J h,ZLLAR A. MOMLSOH, husband of Doris Plorrieon de in his Parcel 2C-2 separate property, aaa''-T.-FfUtut1501d, hus an of M. ~ Horrison, dea].inR in his seaarste prooertv, A etrip of land being that portion of the ASEJ of 5ection 14, Tounship . 25 North, Range GS East, Willamette Heridian, lying on either side of he n inafter collectivelJ roferred to ee Donor; ~ the centerline as subsequently described end included betxeen tvo linea ' , parallel to the centerline, said centerline and parallel linee extending XI7'NESSETH, That the partiee hereto do herebT nutusl]y co.on- . to and being lin►ited by the Southerly line of a 20 foot xide ditch right of wey, as descrfbed in deed recorded in Book "A" of lleeds, page 106, ! ant and agree ee fallowet in Spokane County, Washingtons and the Hortherly lire of a 15 foot strip ' 1~ For uid in con~ider~tion of the ~nneiite to b~ deri~ed of land lyfng northerly to ard ac~ oining eaid 20 loot vide ditch right . bf ' • of vay, as described in deed recorded in Book b73 of Deede, page 410, in the Donor i rom the conetruction by the United Statee of the 9poloine . Spokane Countp~ Washington, said parallel lines lying 20 feet dietant ~1 • ' , oa either eide of, mensured at; right angles to, the Sollowing descrlbed ,v centerline: 4i11ey Project, Kaehington, the Donor doee he nby grant and comey unto the United Stetee, ite eucceeeora uid aeaf.gu, a perpetuel right- Beginning ut a pnint on the West line of tha WJSE} of said , Sac .Ir,n ic_ I~ol feat more or lees aouth of tha ~~orthwost T- ~ ~ of-vRy ind eaeenent to eurrey, consttvct, r.oonetn~ot, ope ntea corner of the E}'rJJ,4E4 of eaid Section 19, said point boing J locat,ed on the Souther?y lina of tha above said 20 foot ditch • inepect, maintain,, und reroove t witer pipelin• or condult and eppurte- ri&ht of uqy; thence north e distance of 38 feet, more or less, , to the Northerlp line of the abcve said 15 foot strip of lend n¢ncea thereto, or a►v parE thereof, through, arer, uid aeroee tFe lping northerly ia and adjoining the 20 foot ditch right of xtw. - • , • 2, The Aonor, hia succeeeors,,or aseigae, or lesseea, if erq, are tolloxing deacribed Lnd eit,wted in the County of 9pakane, 9tat• of . to be paid Por all dwmgea to feroea, cmpe, treest drainage or lrrigatioo • . ! ~ eyetems, and improvemeata vithin the eaid right-of-vay, as aresult of and. ' during comtractlon of the pipellne. Yhe aovunt of daoiagee is to be ' p,ie 1% R. E Exelse Yek ExemD1 E~~• ~ 1965 deteimined by an npprafsal roada prior to the etart of constructlon. Refer ~r to appraieal report uQproved 9eptember 29, 1965, t~~ ^M DtPutY ounly Titawror a 3. Ttie • above •deocribed •real •eebnte-ia-being• ecqr►irid br tha Uaited . , ~`4~V ' Stntea for the Buraau of Reclamation, Depart,ment of the Interior. • ~ The gront of enaement herein contained ie eubject to presently used rights-of-xay for canala, ditches, ilumes, pipeli.nes, railroode, . ' . highvayre, ronde, telephone, telegrayh and poxer transmiesion linae or ' ' public utilitiee, and to*eua6 other righte-of-ya7, reservationa, or ' intenete ee tbe United Stetea detezniuee are not objectiocuble. . 2 • , • o0a ' ---42606w ~ . . . y . ' spokatm Vfs.Jnly 28 1Q03 . - - ~ . Ifor ana in cotuid,erstion of ttu aaa of On* Dollar,($1.00) rro*iprt ~ Baatnsnt . r~h*r*of is hereDy aaknowLefged a sight o= wyr is horehr Qraat.ed Pell City Niokl• IYOrks . Lo the Paeifie 3Lwte• !'i e iLa anQNr , To : ~or• aa~ assigna, ~.~t?i t?~o - t,to ~rrot atd sairtain polts ritJ~ , ' Paaifio aLsL*s lelephone : Lh+ n*e*ssasy xirea aad fiztnr~<_ and 'Nlegrsgh Cmpary :•frosi~bli-ag~-aero~~f'trii~"~'it~'~~ Psapiiq belonalqg to n*,or far ; : tdtich I aa egtntpvtd aitaated !n the Catutty ot.W]catiW,,3tet* of Filed lpr.19-1')06 : WeahJnaton,and OeecriDed aa follotri, 5-5 1= S 2~31.P.u. . i } Fteq.{ignPgLGG . 3cuth Eut quLrt*s Soction Ninetern TvYnahip 25 ~Rat7g• 45 B.A.:1. . Z..;t*wsrt Auditor, : Zt ia urtderstood that the employees of th• asld l'elephon• Cozp- By R.W.butler I3*puty : aty shsll,et afi Lina vArn nfosssarp,have aeeea• to the iaid right : of Rey and the poles and wises Lherson,for pusposo:of typoiri,+tc. ~ Recordec2 uey 14-1906 . prorid: d nlYay s t.het saic7 ltlept►artt Coapnrp ahell be responslbl+ + By H.A.1ee*t'vay Dqruty • for &rpr dua.g• rhich aea► be unnecessari].y dbao to the propertq Yell . ebav• dleeribod. ---o 111tnsaa. Fells Mty Pickl• Vbrics • L.H.Plattor pr.J.Braun • ~ O.Y.Welty , SLat; ot Y1aalilt'atOnO (No COSpolete 8ea1 /lLL"eh j•~ T - OcunLy of 3pok~tw, )se. i~•l•d~) • Ots•Lhia UaL dayy of Octob*r A.D.1905,porsonally appea.r*d b*fors m• (hQrlos P.Lund,• , t ]lotory !'ublio in aM for the ;,Lst• ot %nai1naLon,J.Brain ta sa known Lo b+ the 1anegar of tho ; Yalls City Pickla Works tha' corporation that execvtb the Rithin ard foregoirg inatrm►rnt and acknowlodgQd the adid itut=umettt to be the fre• drd .oiartary nct a.nd deed of iaid eorparalion ;i for Lha uaea mid pwpcee• t1erein nentioned,ard on osth ataLed thst he 'wras wthorisad to •x*ru i: said innLrumertL •nd the►t the a*~l att~xid is the corporate aeal ot swia rorporation. Ip 1rITp?tg,3 WLMHI7oP,2 hava hereunto s+t eq hand and aftizb ay offioial see1 the day and Tsar „ ' . lirst .bovo rrltten. ~ . . ~ ; o~ ~ Qtarles• P.Lund ; Q►asl#• P.Lund.!(otaty PubI1Q, RoaidlM at BQokam,aeahirW.ton. NOTARY PIJBLIC~ • . • . ~ . QMM e/ ~AIw(t.,,n ~ ` ' • ~},2 1 / ~ ~ . . . . ~ 3 ~ ~ / ~ , ~ ~ TRANSMATION TiTLE INSURANCE COMPANY i . ~ ; This sketch is provided, without charge, for yovr ~ - informaiion. It is not intended to shnw alt matters ~ ~ - reiated to the oroperty including, but not limila- M ~ ~ area, dimensions, eassments, encroachments n• tacat'o:+ of bounc+aries. N is not part ot r~na ~ Y :J b n • ~ ~ m0fy, the comniime^t or po!icy t- !v^,r; ;t - ~ . n!tacl%ed. Thn rom-; rv assu:r.es Nii i!,1r.•: ~ i • •nai:er re:areci to th.s sf,e:ch. R~=;~:rc•.rc • ~ '3142 to an accurate s+;rver 0::,; ,-;t~ I ~ ~_~~'r~►- ' ~ 4 t = i~ ; ~ : I~ . . J'700 ~ ~ ~ i ' I r~ „ GLr,~- ! • Ci ~ ~ • ~3; ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - 1 30. . y ~ ~ • ~ ~ 'd ~ ` / • , . . ~ s t i ~ . . ; ~ ! • . - . . - - - - ' : 3 CIT1' OF SpolZne 00 Valle ° y 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.688.0239 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0295 ♦ hrCspokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: June 3, 2009 To: File ~ From: Carrie A~''`°, Deputy City Clerk Re: Moldy documents: P-1753 Turtle Creek 18t Add Final Plat Maps Due to a water pipe breaking in City Hall's basement sometime last year, we are now discovering that several files contain documents with mold on them. The State Archivist Office confirmed with our City Clerk that we should make copies of, then destroy all moldy documents and make a not in the file; that is the purpose of this memorandum. The documents within this file are merely copies of documents which had mold and are now clean and can be handled without concern of contamination. The following lists the original documents which were copied, then destroyed: 0 Final Plat of Turtle Creek First Addition, Sheets 1 and 2 of 2 SValle ~ Y 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.688.0239 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0295 ♦ hr@spokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: June 3, 2009 To: File / From: Carrie Wsta, Deputy City Clerk Re: Moldy documents: PE-1753 Eng Maps ITurtle Creek 1St Add Site Maps Due to a water pipe breaking in City Hall's basement sometime last year, we are now discovering that several files contain documents with mold on them. The State Archivist Office confirmed with our City Clerk that we should make copies of, then destroy all moldy documents and make a not in the file; that is the purpose of this memorandum. The documents within this file are merely copies of documents which had mold and are now clean and can be handled without concern of contamination. The following lists the original documents which were copied, then destroyed: • Unlabled Turtle Creek drawing with arrow pointing to shaded Saltese area • Unlabled GIS map with blurring due to water damage • Preliminary Plat of Turtle Creek, June 1994, Revised August 1994, Revised May 1997 • Preliminary Plat of Turtle Creek, June 1994, date received June 20, 1994 • Official Plat map Sec.19T.25N.R.45E • Unlabled map of Zone A3, Zone C, Zone A1 • Final Plat of Turtle Creek First Addition, dated 6/8/1998, Sheet 2 of 2 • Preliminary Plat of Turtle Creek, June 1994, Revised August 1994 Turtle Creek ST OFF I 0 AL Yt a ~►v ~ ~ 1~► 1 N = V ~ y. 0 N 'kw e5 ` g. , ,)F! . oo I Y,, ~ ~t„ - a - . ~ 04 • • ~ ` ` * ~ O i• ~ ~ t 1STV) . N Z d ~ . ~ 2ND • ' T ~ SE--OND AvE. . . . 2ndA~ ' ' • ~ . " ' ' Y cV r y:RE-: ' . S Rv. • sS,:r,- r.n. A Q ` URT V V 'FOURTN AVE. ~ . - . . _~r: . , ~ - A E ~ v . J . . . / y . ~ . • I . 1 ~ I a .i•v~. ~ ~ ~EtGHT N AVE ~ . . . . . ~ - . . .r : . {.v::•:;{..'•::;_:' • rr.v:. ::;.:,-~•:.::~j•{i:~'''' _'?i rt rS':•:>';:~,'.r_',~.'_!~'~'`;$:':: : . •.Sj:•~ i1i•i::•i:.:' - : •};{4:.<..r'r' • • : v ~ :'.'{.:.'{v:i{:;;>vS ~ . ~ '{'•ii:~'r::•.~. "'y•: ~j~ti~. . :.'v'.S}'•{'~ ~:f~}}}r~S7i}::S}$::r'. {ri:: ~ ..~~~'~r'^:~:'-`-''.::~rf~~:~ii:M!:~:;?{•r:' .?.~,i.+;.,~~.' (ID '~~:Lvii:•;~f..,..r::' :p,vr::?::::~':~;}}Y•?$:'::r..... • r{::~::•::' • fr}'i :':r{:•iC:~} :v:'ri ` ~.`-i:i::$ ~ „r~8:~$:?.}.n;•: . , - ~ ~ ~.fi>:~ . • • _ ~.4::•:: • ,:::::~~::..,i•.:::~;;;::::.;~::::;: ; :.~''~t`~'`''`•?':- ~i::.. `:r:2:~i i'•:`•::•:::; • 0) ~:~,K::•::•::;:~:: : ~ . ' ;:;;:.r • . . •.s•: •::••-:--r::: • ~~V+~~::: ;:f::.,: ;'r ~ {i~{:} . : f.:::..,-y. '~'.'•~:'•::::a•.':~:: • ~ O : • ~:~f;.: ~ - • r.::.~:.:::~ - : ~ . ~ " W OC • ~ M ~ ~ ~ . ' 0 ~A CL. W tD ~ ~f 1 ~ ~ QD . Ol • O ~ N 1 , . Z N ~ r N ~ N ~ . ~ ~.°"T.cJ!°:'^.!' ~ :rt.~fi,F, ~17c_-~-r•i~;:~.fJ:F'=~~:~", "a': . - - Y- =as~~;s`- r ~~,c~.~.. t,C:.x'~°• `r::• x'~ ~1~ ~AS~+•~,~ +d ..f•-. . , ~ " ' - . • ~ ~~j,~ x~"~<.~.~~,"~ i~~~~.".3r~ c ~ ` , ' • ' - ~ Y; . ~ : ~'y^~RC~'7•~G' j,y~~~ ~ ~ ~v.-•;i~ - '~'~"°cg,~,.4•~.r^•r~..'f~,,.;~, _ • ~ . . . . j ~ ' • :n'~ .l A. ~ ~ ~ .yi}• ~ `,?Ari ~ +i}e~F • ' . gy. ~ ~ • . ~ ~ ..FI~;~~~• , e` Q - . O . - , I gTH ~;~RM72 2036 eek R M 69 ZONE A3 2037 p38 ~ ~l 2 l~ 2~39 ~F ~p0 . 2 + -~o ~ RM73 x ZONE A1~ I ~ RMi ~X \ ~ ZONE C ~ = x: . 3 y'• ar• V ~ ' s okane SO Vall ey ° 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.688.0239 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0295 ♦ hrCspokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: June 2, 2009 To: File From: Carrie\646sta, Deputy City Clerk Re: Moldy documents: PE-1753 Turtle Creek 1St Add 208 Drainage Easements Plat File Due to a water pipe breaking in City Hall's basement sometime last year, we are now discovering that several files contain documents with mold on them. The State Archivist Office confirmed with our City Clerk that we should make copies of, then destroy all moldy documents and make a not in the file; that is the purpose of this memorandum. The documents within this file are merely copies of documents which had mold and are now clean and can be handled without concern of contamination. The following lists the original documents which were copied, then destroyed: • Memo from Bill Hemmings, the Office of the County Engineer, Spokane County to Jeff Forry, Department of Buildings, dated December 30, 1997 regarding B.C.C. resolution #91-0882 Implementation (July 2, 1991) • "Sample Letter of Credit" form • "Agreement" form • Assignment form • IPE Plat map: Lot 2, Block 1 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 9/9/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond with Drainage Structure" • IPE Plat map: Lot 3 Block 1 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 9/9/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond without Drainage Structure" • IPE Plat map: Lot 6, Block 1 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 9/9/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond with Drainage Structure" • IPE Plat map: Lot 7, Block 1 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 9/9/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond without Drainage Structure" • IPE Plat map: Lot 1, Block 2 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 9/9/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond with Drainage Structure" \ • IPE Plat map: Lot 3, Block 2 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 10/27/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond without Drainage Structure" • IPE Plat map: Lot 4, Block 2 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 10/27/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond without Drainage Structure • IPE Plat map: Lot 1, Block 3 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 9/9/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond without Drainage Structure • IPE Plat map: Lot 3, Block 3 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 10/27/97 • IPE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11/19/97 "Typical 208 Pond without Drainage Structure" • IPE Plat map: Lot 4, Block 3 Turtle Creek First Addition dated 10/27/97 • I PE Plat map: Turtle Creek First Addition dated 11 /19/97 "Typical 208 Pond without Drainage Structure" t ` . OFFICE OF THE COTJNTY ENGINEER SPOKANrE COUINTY, WASHINGTON TO: Jeff Forry, Department of Buildings FROM: Bill Hemmings DATE: Tuesday, December 30, 1997 SUBJECT: B.C.C resolution #91-0882 Implementation (July 2, 1991) Attached are the individual lot plans for each lot containing a swale in TURTLE CREEK 1ST ADD, plat # PE-1753. P]ease give the appropriate lot plan to the individual applying for a building permit on the lot, so they can draw their house and approach to scale on the lot. We will need this plan, and the corresponding $1,000.00 cash surety, in the form of cash, letter of ciedit, or savings assignment, before we can issue the approach permit. Also attached are the letter of credit and savings assignment forms. < t ` "SAMPLE LETTER OF CREDIT" "(USE BANK LETTERHEAD)" (BANK NAME ADDRESS ZTP CODE PHONE # AND OTHER INFOR1tiLATION IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT AMOUNT: $ a.,000.00 NO. BENTFICIARY: SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS 1026 W BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260-0170 SUBJECT: LOT BLOCK TURTLE CREEK 1 ST ADD (Plat) PLAT# PE-1753. (Developrnent) Gentlemen: We hereby authorize our irrevocable Letter of Credit in your favor, and authorize you to draw on the (bank), a draft up to one thousand (Dollars) 1,000.00) , for the account of , (developer). The draft, drawn under this Letter of Credit, covers the assurance of completion of installation of storm drainage, drainage swales, sod and other work as is incidental and related thereto iu accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office on (date), and is to be accompanied by the following documents: written request by Spokane County Engineer's Office to (baak), at the above address indicating non-completion of a11 or any of the above improvements and that amount of money required to complete such improvements. We hereby agree with the drawer, endorser and bona fide holder of this draft, negotiated under and in compliance with the terms of this credit, that said draft shall be duly honored upon pzesentation at the (bank), at any time before completion of the above-described improvements or performance, in which event written notice shall be given by Spokane County to the bank. (developer) shall be responsible for any cost incurred by the county in excess of the amount of security. Drafts, dzawn under this Letter of Credit, shall bear on their face the words Dra,Am under (bank) (bank address) Credit No. Dated Bank Name: By: . (authorized signor) . ~ "AGREENENT" In consideration of the issuance of a building permit for Lot , Block , TURTLE CREEK 1ST ADD (plat) plat # PE-1753 (Developer) has deposited $1,000.00 with Spokane County as security for full and faithful performance by Developer respecting certain drainage facilities and sod in accordance with the drawings and specifications as submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Engineers Office on . (date) 199 . Developer hereby agrees that should such drainage facilities and sod not be constructed in accordance with the approved drawing within six months of occupancy, Spokane County may then use the security to bring these facilities and sod into conformance therewith. Developer shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the county in excess of the amount of security. Spokane County agrees to return to Developer any unused funds upon satisfactory completion of these facilities and sod. NAME & ADDRESS TO BE RETURNED TO: (Developer Signature) DATE t ASSIGNMENT For security purposes only, (developer) hereby assigns to SPOKANE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Vdashington, the following: Savings Certificate Number in the face amount of S1.000.00 and held in and by Bank of . Branch (bank address) This assignment is made as security for full and faithful performance by (developer) of certain drainage facilities and sod for LOT BLOCK , TURTLE CREEK 1ST ADD (Plat) Plat # PE- 1753 in accordance witti the drawings: and specifications as submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Engi.neers office on . (date) )199 Any interest benefits accruing under said savings certificate shall remain the property of (developer). Said savings certificate to be released to .(developer) any other party only with the prior written consent and agreement of Spokane County. PROVIDED, FURTHER, the undersigned does hereby authorize (bank) to pay over to Spokane County all or a sufficient portion of the monies in the savings certificate referenced hereinabove upon written documentation being received from the Spokane County Engineer indicating that the purposes for which the savings certificate was assigned have not been fully and faithfully performed as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer as required and a statement of that amount of money which the County Engineer deems necessary to complete such obligation. Upon receipt of such written documentation, (developer) hereby authorizes (bank) to release to Spokane County that amount of money requested up to the maximum amount in the savings certificate. (developcr) shall be responsible for any costs incurred by the county excess of the amount of security. DATED this day of , 199 . BANK OF PrecidPnt t 1 . ~ ~ . ~ 5' PLANTING STRIP , . TYPE `R' CURB BOTTOM ELEV. = 2067.24. . _ , _ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ; f ~ ~ , i ~ - BOTTOM AREA - 841 S.F, i r ~ ~ i ~ , ; f ~~12 ;~g , ,i' i : E i ~ r' ; ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ; r ~ . , , ; j . ; ~ , , TOP OF BERM = 2068.67 ~i ; % % , , , ~ ~ f r ~ ~ ; . ; ( J / / ~r ~ i ~ i i~ ~ ; ~ , - ~ . ~ VOLUME PR VI - 4 F ~ ~ ~ ~ / % ~ - ' % ~ ~ 0 DED - 20.50 C. . , , , , , ~ , ~ , _ ~ . i i ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ; ' ~ . ~ , ~ d.' '~J ; r i - ~ ~ i ~ ,,r ~ ~ r ~ _ . . i / / ~ r . ' i ~ ( I / 1 I , ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ f~ ~ I ~ / i ~ ; , ~ l / ~ W ~ ~ i~ ~ / / ~ / ~ ~ ~ % ~ f ~ % ~ ~ \ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ / / ~ ~ ~ / / ~ % / / ' ~ ~ j J / i / ~ r : ~ l / / / r' , / / . ~ r ~ ~ ' ~ • ~ I f ~ i ~ ~ / . ~ \ / J , / i i ~ ~ ~ r' ~ ~ ~ ! i i / ~ / / ~ ~ ~ L. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ / ~ ; r ~ ~ , /i ~ , ~ ~ 1~ , i % i ~ ~ i , . ~ ' L ~ ~ / / ~ f / 1 ~ ~ , / r + Q. .g , . , , VIIA l~ ~ ' ~ ; !r ~ / ~ f ~ ! ` / ~ i ~ . ~1-, ~ S ; . ~ / ~ . G G~OF l~/ ~ t !r i r' ~ ; i .r % ~ ; ; r \ ; ~ r ' , . ~ I ~ V O ~ t ! / % ~ . r : ~ ! ~ / , ' ~ / 7 ~ i~~ % ~ ~ / i I rI I ~ ! I ~ ~ ~ / i~ i ~ i J : ~ ~ . i ~ i~ / % 1 ~ ~ ' ' , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ % % • - L 5.50 WIDE SIDEWALK ~ . ' i , ; ~ i i ~ E-► i % ` ~ . ~ ~ I Z / i ~ 1 i , , , 1 J i' : , ; ; / r H. ti ~ ~ / ~ f : ; • ~ Z . f / 1 r ~ ~ ~ ~ i ' ~ ✓ I r' / / ~ 11 i i ~ ~ ~ . ' / i / % ' i w i / l % i / . ~ ~I ~ / % / ~ j i ' ~ ~ ~ . i / ! f / / ; ~ ! r ~ f J . ~ ~i f'~ , r' W ~ / ; ~ i ! i' / `I ~ / / j"I ~ / ~ ; ,r'' • % ~ i 13037 / / ~ ~ / J i ~ / i / i / / ~ ~ r : j ~ ; ; ~ .W a { / / ~ r ~ ! ; ! ~ ~ / ~ % ' ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ r~ f % ~ I - , ; , ; ~ ; , , , , , ~ , , , • , STA. 11+9d, 37 RT. SiE~ , , ~ ~ ~ i r i ~ ~ ~ ; i ~ ~ ~ ~ - , ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ' , ; ~ ~ ~ ;~:Y J ~ ~ INSTALL CONCRETE IPJLET TYPE Sl0 ~ r ~ - ~ i r r % ; ; ' ; ' . ~ ' . . c,.~ . ~ NAL , , ; , , , , ; - f . ; ; ~ ; , ~ ~ f , ,r ~ ' . Q F _ , ~ 1 PER SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD TYP E ~ ~ i t ' ' r ; / , / % % ~ I / ; / ! ~ 1 ~ ~ I1 ; i ~ . ! i ~ ~ . ~ i ~ r i % ~ ~ ~ / ; / r / / ~ . w , PLAN B-5 WITH TYPE 1 METAL 3TANDARD ETAL EXPIRE~ o6i1 t ' ~ ! , ~ ' ~ , ; , ' ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ' ' ~ W ' I ~ ~'f , i ' ' % ' . u~- ° ' ~ ; ~ ~ ~r ; ~ ; ; , ~ , , , ~ _ ~ FRAME AND TYPE 2 METAL GRATE ry i ~ ~ i ~ ~ i , ~ i , ; , ; _ T~fa Tr ~ ~ ' / i . ! ' . ' i' ~ f ~ ~ i~ i'O ~ ~ ; ~ : ; ' r' . , ~ f•z o ; RIM ELEV. - 2067.74 ~ ; ~ , ~ ~ / ~ ~ ; ! ~ % r ~ / %,i~ / i'~ ~ •O N N ~ _ s n - . . ~ , , . , 12 I.E. - 2064.20 ~ ~ i / 1 , / •J ~ f/ I / ~ ' ' / t ! j~ ~ i l / ~ - i - - . I ,f r f~ e' / ~ ~ ' ? ! ! / ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I y j ~ : f f / ~ ~ ! ~ / ~ % / ~ ' / . ~ . Q~ ' ~ 1 f~ i ; ' r ~ ' ,i i ! ~ J - ' 12 CMP ~ 11.25 L.F. , ~ ( } / ! r f i i r ~ / / i ~ ~ / ~ / ~ • f7 ~ . , ~ ~ . ~ ~ / / ~ ! 1 / ` , i / l~ / . - ~ ~ , r ~ i , r , . . ~ , ~ SLOPE - 0.0178 , a r' ; ; - ~ i , , i , . . , . i i ~ ~ / ~ ~ i r ~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ; / ~ : .l - I ~ , / i ` / ~ ~ ; / ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ / r , . • ' / 1~I / / i / ~ , l I . i , ~ ~ ~ / ~i , r ; ~ ' ~ ' r ~STA: '11+90,~ 25.75 RT. ~ ~ ; ; ~ . , i r , ~ ; ; , a ' ~ ~ i i . ~ • ; ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ; , , ; / i • r' ; / ~ ~ ; . 5 ~ INSTALL TYPE B DRYWELL PER i ~ . . , ~ ~ i' i r f ~ , ~ ; , ,f ` ' i I • . i / i ' i i T i / / , i ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i / • • I - _ PER , • ~ . ; , , , , ; . , ~ ; ~ . ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD ~ % r ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . - < < ; ~ ; ~ , ; ' . , , ~ ; , , : ~ - TY 4 M T ~ ~ , 1 . I PLAN B 1 WITH PE E AL ,RD IETAL ~ ; ; ~ i ~ ! r ~ i ~ ~ ; ~ ' ,l i ; . , ~ i ~ , , / ; . % , , ~ ; r , f , r r' ,r~ . ~ ~ FRAME AND SOLID LID ~ ~ ~ i ! i ~ ~ ~ ~ \ j ~ ~ i ~ ~r ~ .i i ! I i , i % ~ ; ~ ~ ; ~ ~ r % ~ ` ; . t ~ RIM ELEV. = 2068.54 ~ ~ ~ ~ / : i % l ~ \ ' % j ~ / r.i ~ i I ~ : f ; ~ ~ . ~ ' ~ ~ ; ; ; f' . ~ 12 I.E. = 2064.00 / ; / i / . ' / • ~ i ~ i ~ ~ i ~ / ~ ~ . . . - - - I - ~ ~ ~ : / r i ~ ~ ~ ~ f I - J , ; ' ` ' ~ t ; ~ ~ ~ ; ; / ~ ~ % : 45 ~ ,r , ~ f ~ ~ / / f ~ t ~ 1 ~ ~ l / u~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ; / / i f / i r : , i' , / i ~ / i , • I~ / ~i ,I % / ~ i / { r i l j . ..~I. ! ~ ; % ~ / i ~ / 1 , . i ! , ~ f ~ i ~ / ~ • 1 ~ , % , ~ / , ~ 29 , / i~ / ~ ~ ! i ! r / ~ ~ ! r' / N : r . i / ~ i 1~~: / i f':' i ,1 i r. / / N. , ~ . , , , , r ~ , i ~ i ~ ~o = STA. 12+01,67, RT. , ~ ~ , , ' 'f ~ ~ i % - • ' ~ i ~ i ~ ~ f / / ~ ~ I~ , I ~ ~ - - ~ ~ . ~ r ~ ~ % ~ ~ 4 TYPE 1 CURB INLET WITH 5 APR , ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ; ~ , ;-~1~ ~ i ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ cn: TH 5' APRON ; ~ - ; ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! . 7.5 ~ _ T. V. = 6 .47 AND . , r % ~ ~ o C. ELE 2d 8 , ; ~ , , ~ z~ 3.oa n - . . , , ~ . . , . . . , ~ . . . . ~ . ~ I ~ , ; TYPE 2 CI~RB INLET ~ 1~ ! ~ ' _ ~ ~p , ~ T.G ELEV.- 2068.47 I p p Q DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ n , I . ~ ~ ~ . ~ I I -F G' ; i ~ . . , OUNDARY OF V ~ _ I ~5 : 6 FLAT, LE EL ; ~ J, ~s~ PONO BOTTOM AREA f ' - ~ / PlA7 BOUNDARY ~ ~ , ~ ~ I y ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..I ~s ! [ 4"~' ( . ~ ~ 0 , N SCALE: 1 "=20' , / ~ ~ ~ ,NLAND ~ ACIFIC ~ ~ NGIN~ERING 707 West lth • Suite 200 (509j 458-6840 • ~ Spokane, WA 98204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 DATE: 9/9/9 i ~ ~ . ~ NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOF'SOIL IF TNE DRYWELL GRATE IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD *DIMENSION IS TO POND BOTTOM AFTE$ TOPSOIL AND S00 HAS BEEJN INSTALLED. R.O.W. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN r-GUTTER ` TOP 0F BERM ELEV. = URB FLOWLINE NLET TOP OF CURB ELEV. I+.20 FT. 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD -ROLLED ~ INSTALLED CONCURRENT Wli~l CURB & i OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER 3:1 TYP. r 1 NORMAL GUTTER LINE ~~:~!'•f GRAIE ELEVATION 1•4' 3:1 (TYP) _ : .s,* ~ ,.V: ••N~ , RAINAGE 3:7 MqX. STRU~TURE ~ CONCRETE APRON NOTE: / -"f- ScC- P ° THICK . P.GC. ~t rN~~ t 4 _ PROViDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAI.) BETWEEN 1"-3" TOPSOIL ON THE NATIVE SOIL AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN GRADED POND BOTTOM THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND 7HE DRYWELL BARREL. GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11'-1.28' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT ' SEC110N AL VI EW TYPICAL '248' POND WiTH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE PR~ L~ ; G•~ oF wA , lt t l - 13037 O FCI~.~ ~SrorvAL EXPIRES 06/11/ J%~& I NLAND PACiFic TU R LTE C R EEK FI RST AD D ITI 0 N ENGINEERINC3 707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-684o DATE: 11 /19/97 \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844/ / I ~ ~ I r ' . ~;y' ~l ' . _..._I _ ~ - , BOT10M ELEV. = 2067.24 ~ , 1 BOTTOM AREA = ~ ~ ~ . 841 S.F. I ~ ~ TOP OF BERM = 2068.67 ~ . ~ i tti ~ VOLUME PROVIDED = 420.50 C.F. ~ , - - ~ . I _ - ~ I . . . I . • in ~ j ` I ~ 14$.00 ~ . , , , . , , ' / ~ ! ! / i ~ i i i ~ ~ T~ ~ , , , ~ ; ~ •.-7,5 STA. 12+01.67, RT. ~ ~i i / / a j ~ ..~y._ ( ~ > > ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ 4 TYPE 1 C19R6 INLET WITH 5 APRON ~ i i ~ i i j' : in~ - , ~ ~ ~ . ~ T.C. ELEV. - 2~68.47 AND l i I i ~ l ; ' ;cn O• lJ ~ ~ ~ N O ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; N: . , ~ 5 i:~. TYPE 2 CURB INLET ~ i ~ , ~ i r 2 9 i ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ; T.C. ELEV. =2068.47 ~ i r ~ ' . I~ ~ i / t 1 i ~ • ' / 1 1 f ~ i ~ ~ ~ - = ) , / ~ I _ / / % ~ r i I / % 1 / I ! ! i / I ~ ~ . , I ?5.~~ i i i ~ ~ i 45 r ; / I i ~ • , I / I ! ~ 1 ~ ~ , / ~ . / , i I . / ~ ~ ) 1 . i i % E i ~ .i • ~ l ~ i i I 1 / / ~ t : ei / . ~ ~ ~ ( ; • I ~ ~ ~ ~ . " ' / / ~ , / W 1 ~ / ~ . ~ n 1 , . I - > ~ ~ r ~ = ~ ~ ~ ; r ; ~ Q / ' ; ~ , I - ' / ( ; ~ ~ l / ; : ~ .C l i ; ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ; ; ~ M 1 ~ W i ' ' ' w s~ ~ ~ ; % % w~ ~ ~ N / ~ ' 'x ~ ~ } c9 ~ < < ~Q~~ QI o Z 3 1 w o ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~ t ~ / I N. i 1 ~W ~ ~ j i 1 ~ ~ N r 1 ~ t i ~ F.. I ~ 1 - \ hn., ~1 4 ~ ( ' ~ ~ r~~ i ~ ~ ' I E r + 1 r;o w - 1 r ~ i ~ ol ~ i ~ ~ Y~ ~ 4 . ' 1 ~ ~ OI ~ ~ • 1 ; 4,~~~ ~~f. IA 'T$=~ , 1 , ; ~ ; M N1 I ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ - ~ ' ' : ! 1 : ~ ti . ~ I . ~ ~ . . \ ; ! ~ I ~ l ~ I L. - , ~ ~ ; . . I R . . ~ - , ~9 ~ . _ ~ P ~ ~ , ~ wns ~ . 5 50 WIDE SIDEWALK o ~i ~ ~ ~ G ; ; . ~ ~ ti ~w . i l , ~I ~ . \ y ,x ~ ~ ; . ~ ' ~ ~ -a 5 PLANTING STRIP ~ f i ; 1 ~ • ~ J ~ • I \ j~ + . A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ TYPE R CURB . I ~ 13037 r-'' , ~ ~ I ~ F~~~ E , . ~ i~s.oo . ~ L~ PLAT BOUNDARY S G ~ I , f~NAL ~ Q ~ ~ EXPIRES 0&/1U ~r t SCALE: 1 "=20 iLE: 1 20' ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NLAND ~ ACIFIC ~ ~ ' ~ NGINEERING 707 West 7th •5uite 200 (509) 458-6840 . Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-8844 ~ i DATE: 9/9/9~ fE: 9/9/97 ~ : R.O.W. . I DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN ~UTTER ~ FLOWUNE 0 TOP OF SERM ELEV. = CURB INLE7 ~ TOP OF CURB ELEV. - ~+•20 FT• 1.5" SOD ON 70PSOIL. SOD OLLED . ~ 1NSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH ~ CURB . I OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE NORMAL GUTTEF~ L1NE 3: ) ' 3:1 (TYP) -5'* *DIMEN510N IS TO POND BOTT4M CONCRETE APRON ~g TOPSOIL AND SOD 4" THICK P.C.C. . HAS BEEN INSTALLED. 1.5°t SOD ON TOPSOIL SECTIONAL VIEW 1" MIN. TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM n?lCAL 1208' POND WiTHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE , fv07 TO SCALE wASNr jt - 13037 . ~ CfS'i~`~ ~Srorra,L~G . IXPIRES 06/11/ ~ I NLAND PACIFIc TU R LTE C R EEK Fl RST AD D IT10 N ENGINEERINC 707 west 7th • Svite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 11 /19 /97 J . \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844, ~ 1 , ~ . . . ~ . STA. 1fi+9Q, 25.75' RT. STA, 17+01.67, RT. , ~ E C Y STNADARD ~ ' ~ SPOKAN OUNT 4 TYPE 1 CURB INLET WITH 5 APRON BOTTOM ELEV. = 2067.20 ~ ~ ~ ~ TYPE 8 DRYWELL WITH T.C. ELEV. = 2068.43 AND . BOTTOM AREA = 1,122 S.F. p~4p LID . TYPE 4 METAL FRAME &,_S TY~E 2 CURB INLET TOP OF BERM = 2068.63 , ~ STA. 16+90 3 RT RIM ELEV~, ~ 246-~5f T.C. ELEV. = 2068.43 V - ~ ~ • • OLUME PROVIDED - 561 C.F. - ~ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD - 20~64.00 • CONCRETE INLET TYP - - - - - . ~ r~r~ ~ ~P „ ~ E 1 METAL FRAME ND 12 CMP (11.25 L.F.) . TYPE 2 h4ETP,L GRATE SLOPE = 0.01?8 TYPE 'R' CURB RIM ELEV. = 2067.70 ~ 2" i.E. = 2064.zo 8th AVE. ~ , ~ i i , PLAT BOUNDARY 5 PLANTING STRIP . , . , _ _ ~ ~_t. " u , _ _ _t~a~:x.~~== ~ =~~"s~`t~:-,~'° ~ ' ~ ~ ~p 'S~ w._ ~ ~ _ ~ ` s 1 ~ _ . ~ . . . . ` n n ' ~ ~iY, W i ♦ ~.~.~e' - iri. .~%IS~ i~.F~~' , . u, ~ r . r _ - l - r - SF -~7: _ - _ _ ,~4~+t x ~ ~ : - ~ -~-=<-t,-~k~'r ~ - _ ' - - ' " - a- p.fYk<.,' ~ ~ . _ ~ = - - - - 93., . - _.;r;~-'._; _ ~ _ . . - - ; ~ ;r f e 125.40 ~n . 5.50' WIDE SIDEWALK ~ C~-/'~~ ~ ' ~1 1 I V.JVI • 13.50 WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT . - - ~ • - - - ~ . _ . • '20 , . . . I I ~ ~ 69 ~ 7.5~ ; . . ~ ~ ~ . ~ _ , . I. . . f . . p ~ ' O ~ ( ~ N~ ' I li7 , I ' Si Oj . . ' . d' I ~ I I ' • . . 35 BllILDING SETBACK ~ • • ( . ( : : ' ~ , ~ 16.50' ; 6.57' ~ . ; ~ ~ • ~ ' : _ _ .W_ J ; • { ' ^r' 24 i o ; BOUNDARY OF FLAT, LEVEL o ~ ~n , POND BOTTOM AREA ~ ~ ; ~ MENT DRAINAGE EASE 1 ~ o . ; o , k ~ 6 1 . ~ ; ~ ► . L. t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P wA ~ F s~, G o ; ~ i ~ Z 1 ~ ~ i i I _ 1 1 1 i ~3~ ~ ~ R ' 0 FC►~ . S G I~NAL~ ~ O611 t ~ EXPIRES I 125.00' ~ (J i ~ f SCA~E: ~ SCALE: I"= 20' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ NLAND ~ ACIFIC ~ _ . NGINEERING 707 West lth • Suite 200 (509~ 458-6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: 309 458-6844 DAI~: 9/9/9' ~ ) ~ ~ 1: 9 /9 /9 7 ~ NOTE: ORGANIC CARBON TESTING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL IF THE DRYVYELL GRATE IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD *DIMENSION IS TO POND 80TTOM AFTER TOPSOfL AND SOD HAS BEFN INSTALLED. R.O. W. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFlED ON PLAN UOWUTTERNE ~ ~ ~L TOP 0F BERM ELEV. _ CURB iNLET TOP OF CURB ELEV. ~+.20 FT. 1.5" S00 ON TOPSOIL, SOD '-ROLLED ~ INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH CURB & ~ OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER 3:1 IYP. ~~J NORMAL GUTTER LItVE ~ GRATE ELEVATION 1 .43:1 (TYP) : . ' • 5 RAINAGE 3:1 A~{AX. - ~CONCRETE STRU~:TURE APRON / N OTE: ~ SCz,-- Pi, Ari 1!!E w ro 0- iN c. 4" Tl-I . ICK P.C. C. PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) BETWEEN 1~-3~ TOPSOIL ON THE NATIVE SO1L AND THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN GRADED POND BOTTOM THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL GRADED POND BOTTOM 1.11'-1.28' BELOW EDGE OF ASPHALT SECTIONAL VIEW TYPICAL '208' POND WITH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE , NOl' TO SCALE . G~ o~ wa l 13037 O `PFCISi75~~ ~SfONAL ~G EXPIRE5 06✓11/ Am ~ 1NLAND TURLTE CREEK F1RST ADDITION PACIFIC ENGINEERING 707 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 11 /19/97 ~ Spolcane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-68 44 oe ` 1 , 1 • ' ~ STA. 17+01.fi7, RT. _ ~ , 4' TYPE 1 C~JRB INLET'WITH 5' APRON BOTTOM ELEV. 2067.24 T.C. E~EV. = 2068.43 AND BOTTOM AREA = 1,122 S.F. TYPE 2 CURB INLET TOP OF BERM = 2068.63 ~ T.C. ELEV.= 2068.43 VOLUME PROVIDED = 561 C.F. ~ TYPE 'R' CURB 8th AVE. PLAT BOUNDARY ► ~ 5' PLANTING STRIP " y _ . ~ ~ ~'~y~~ _ . ~°"~,.u' J~w,~ ~2r--.- ~rp~r ~ h~s.ur ~ ,7' - i'an~~~~ . ~ , ~ . ~ ~ i u n nu~ i~i ' ~ _"`,m `fl'~~i1~~ ~ . ' . ~ ~ ~ =.~~a/Lw ~~~~''•~~f::~'":~..... ~ rg '1~ • n ~'yl.~f 25._...`.., & ;h i!;..~.~~•'Ee.4{'4~M_ _ , ~ . - fr r_n!~ =✓.y* _ . e+`~="-_• - ~ .+~imi. i ~ g _ ~~?4~€~~ . ~ ~ i ~ .-1 _ _ . . , .~:s. Li ' J~~: ~ ~.~I ~G in 125.00 5.50 WIDE SIDEWALK r~ I 16.50' ~ : ~ ~_~.w_ , , - ~ ~ _ ~ _ I _,.•-'13.50 WIDE U1ILITY EASEMENT . - ~ - _ ~ - ' , - • ~ ,I ~ : 7.5 • . ~ I ~ ~ • . • I n ! ~ ~ ~ ; ( r~ ~n c. • ~ t,. , • . vi f I ~ ~ ~ , , ~ 35' BUILDING SETBACK I ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ ~.,~a' ~ s. 50' ~ _ _ , _ ~ - I I , ' ~ - - ; ► 24 , I ~ f ; B~OUNDARY OF FLAT, LEUEL + ~ o ` ~ o POND BOTTOM AREA o , ~ i ~i o ; , ~ , , ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ ! ~ ~ ; i ; ~ F ~ ; 7 1 ~ ► ; ~ ; , . ~ , L. ~ ; ' p ~ f ~ ~ , P `u~ s . ~ - F SH i ~ a 0 ; G ; ti ~w ~ ; e ~ ` r ti ~ 1 y t { I ~ ! 1 I i ¢ ' ~J ' + i ~ 1303 ~ S ~ ~F~ ; 0 fSTE~ ~ . S G ~ f rONAL~ ~ d ~ ~ { 125.00' ~ i EXP1RES 06It 1l • ~ ~ ~ i ~V u r ~ SCALE: 1 =20 i ~ . NLAND ~ ACIFIC ~ N~INEERING ~o~ w~t ~th • s~~te ~oo (509) 458-6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 ` ~ DATE: 9/9/97 9/9/97 ~ ' R.O.W. 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFlED ON PLAN - ~UTTER i FLOWUNE 0 TOP OF BERM ELEV. = CURB INLET Fl TOP OF CURB ELEV. +•20 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD OLLED INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH CURB &OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER NORMAL GUTTER, LINE r ~ 3:1 (TYP ) I . 1~J 3:1 {TYP) .5.~. ~ •y~4. ~ •,•r *DIMEN510N IS TO POND BOTTOM CONCftETE APRON eQER TOPSOIL AND SOD _ 4" THICK P.C.C. . HAS BEEN INSTALLED. 1.5°f SOD ON TOPSOIL SECTIONAL VIEW 1" MIN. TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM TYPICAL '208' P4ND IMTHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NQT TO SCAIF G~AoF wASkr • ~ 13037 ~SrONAL~G . D(PIRES 06/11/ 1 D NLAN PAC1FIC TU R LTE C R EEK FI RST AD D IT14 N . ENGINEERINC 707 west 7th • 5uite 200 (SQS) 458-6840 DATE: 11 /19/97 ` Spakane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844/ \ J ~ ~ ~ T. ~ 8th AVE. STA. 21+55, R . ~ ' TYPE 1 CURB INLET WITH 5' APRON 5 BOTTOM ELEV. = 2071.19 ~ T.C. ELEV. = 2073.83 AND BOTTOM AREA = 673 S.F. _ . : TYPE 2 CURB INLET TOP OF BERM = 2072.62 ' T,C. ELEV. = 2073.83 ~ VOLUME PROVIDED = 336 C.F. ~ • - ° - - - - ' - - . r , . ' ~ TYPE R CURB 8th AVE. . . . . ~ ~ PLAT BOUNDARY i ~ )ARY ~ ~ 5 PLANTING STRIP , r ' GREENACRES STA. 12+60 RT. ~ . - . - , _ : . - ~ a=--- - ~ ~-~r~ ..<a-..~_:-_~= ;!.~*t;~~- ~?s._ , ~~~i.'':~:~;3,$s$~G._'~~~'4~3;~~=~:• ':?"r`~~~~~-~~br-7~'~,~.~i;~~ ~ Y. ~ £ ~ a :v ~ , 5 TYPE 1 CURB INLET - - ~ t.' - - ~ -r..' ~L~ . ~y_ - ~ , - - ~ ~ ~ ~~~:<a~ - ~ - J f'.'~E ' .,4aF..~ ~.a~r' i;'*`>;:t~ x~' ~l~Y~~~r~+<,~~~t~~~4~ . t~'~-~tia ~~"~~=~~~~a~r~~.'~ T.C. ELEV. = 2072.42 - % ° . _ ~YA I K - ~ fio~.oo' I ~ I • ~ ~ , ~ - 5.50' WIDE SIDEWALK . q 10.92 , 13.50 WIDE UTiLIT'Y4F~SEMENT ~g ~ . i _~t _ ~ ' 3.~ ' BOUND~ARY OF FLAT LEVEL . GREENACRES STA. 12+48, 22 RT. ~ 3 ~ • , ~ SPOKANE COUNTY STANDAR ~ ~o~ / • o''°.. POND BOTTOM AREA ~ 3.69 ~ ~n; ` ~ ~ N TYPE B DRYVJELL WITH . ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ ~ TYPE 4 METAL FRAME & GRATE ~ . 3.64 . ~ ~ ~ , DRAINAGE EASEMEI~T ' ~ . I . RIM ELEV. = 2071.69 • ~1 '~ti ~ ~O.ss ~ ~ - . _ . _ _ _ _ . . ~ 35 BUILDING SETBACK ;i `1. ~1 . ~ ~ ~ . • ~ -~ti ~ I ` , I ` ~ ~ ~ ` ~ I . w O I^ . ~'t V / (Q I W • _`ti I ~ ~ , ~ , ~ . o <n l : ~ ~3 U ~ ~ , Q z . _ W ~ ~ 1 ~ . Z ~ ~r.. W •1. W ~ Q . O ~ ~ W W U] ~ I w• ~ ~ . ~ r `~,cn' . ~ ~ c~ ~ ~ Z : . L. ~ . ~ ~ - ~ I o: ~9 , - P s , ~ w W - , oF o I , , ~ ► m • . - . ~ ti r ~ ~ w- ~ ~ ~ fo ~ o: x M• ~ ~ r p . ~ • ~ II . ~ ' .y 1 "=20' ~ ~D ; ~ ~ ~ ; ` \ ~ ~ , 3 ; ; ~ 1 . ~ cr ~ ti ~ • , S ~ . loN~.~' . I ~ IRES o6111/ • ~ IXP ~ . ~ I' . TE: 9/9/97 ~ I 125.00' ~ SCALE: 1 "=20' ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~ NLAND ~ ACIFIC ~ ~ NGINEERING ~o~ w~t ~tn ~ s~ite 200 (5os) a~a-se~o Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 ~ DATE: 9/9/9 J NOTE: ORGANiC CARBON TESIING IS REQUIRED FOR THE TOPSOIL lF TNE DRYWELL GRA7E IS GREATER THAN 0.5' ABOVE SOD . *DIMENSION IS TO POND BOTTOM gF-TER TOPSOIL AND SOD HAS BEEN INSTALLED. R.O. W. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN r--GUTTER ~ FLOWLINE 0 TOP 0F BERM ELEV. _ • CURB 4NLET TOP OF CURB ELEV. • ' ~+.20 FT. 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD -ROLLED ~ INSTALLED CONCURRENT WIT}i CURB & ~ OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER ~ 3:1 Tl'P. NORMAL GUTTER LINE " GRATE ELEVATION 1•4' 3:1 (TYP) - T J~ rY~~.\~ • 5I , RAINAGE 3:1 MqX ~CONCRETE STRU~TURE APRON / 4" TH{CK P.C.C. NOTE: 1 "-3" TOPSOIL ON PROVIDE FILTER FABRIC (AMOCO 4545 OR EQUAL) 6ETWEEN GRADED POND BOTTOM THE NAT1VE SOIL AND THE WASHED pRAIN ROCK AND BETWEEN THE WASHED DRAIN ROCK AND THE DRYWELL BARREL. GRAOED POND BOTTOM 1.11'-1.28' BEIOW EDGE OF ASPHALT SECT10NAL VIEW TYPICAL '208' POND WiTH DRAINAGE STRUCTURE , NOT TO SCALE G•~ oF w,a ~ A~o ~ / ' - l< 13037 CIS D ~SfONAL ~G EXPIRES o6/11/ ~ I NLAND TURLTE CREEK FIRST ADDITION PAGIFIC ENGINEERING 707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 11 /19`97 `Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-684-4 J ~ J 1 STA. 24+69, RT. ~ 4' TYPE 1 CURB INLET WITH 5' APRON ~ BOTTOM ELEV. = 2076.90 T.C. ELEV. = 2077.73 AND BOTTOM AREA = 330 S.F. TYPE 2 CURB INLET TOP OF BERM = 2077.73 . T.C. ELEV. = 2077.73 VOLUME PROVIDED = 165 C.F. TYPE `R' CURB 8th AVE. PLAT BOUNDARY 5' PLANIING STRIP €~-=~aS'~.`~"".~:' _ ;~'`j~~yy~ .r~ _ "~'~y~~~~yy~~~ ~'4e . t - +5.y~y..' - +}R'"A2V.WIRS ~ i~9 _,w Yi ~N~Ih . i ~'ar Y~1~'. ^ n~r .~~~~i°i. ~ lr pa i~,31W"'--~. r. u '~~"T{~ 'y'_ - " ' ~ -~T.-~i-T~.'~ ' ~ 1~ ._k~~,izs.. ':K~:tT ,y'~ .~k.tc.".~t ~ . . '.is~.,:~ ,.«.v..;sr'~'t~r~~>..~s i ` I - 84.0~ - ~ , ' - ~ I ~i-~~o . ~ . ~ 5.50 WIDE SIDEWALK 13.50' ~ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ WIDE UTIUTY EASEMENT _ _ ` _ _ . - - , ~ • rJ~ ~ 14.5 , ~ ~ . _ . ~ _ ~ N ,~~i . ~1~ . . ~ N U 1V ~ _ 1° I i ~ ~ I~ ~ ; . , - ~ ~.50~ N ` . . ~ . 35' UI IN ' ' B..LD . G, SETBACK..................1 . ~ . ~n ' ~ ~ : ~ , ~ S . . , LL 7.. ~ w. ~ BOUNDARY OF FLAT, LEVEL ~ POND BOTTOM AREA . o o ~ . ~ N ~ oi ~ ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 3 2 ~o 7g L. ~ ~ R q . P A s . . ~ F w SN ~ ~ rti ~ ~ G ti ~w ~ . ~ ~ , . ~ j ~ - • ~ • I ~ i 13037 ti, , 0 FCIS(~ G SrONAL~ ~ ~ EXPIAES 06/11! ` ~ ~ J • 84.00' . ~ ~ ~ SCALE: 1 "=2~ ~ / ~ ' , ~ NLAND . ACIFIC ~ NGINEERING 707 West lth • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX; (509) 458-6844 DATE: 10 2% JE: 10/27/97 ~ ~ J ` , ~ / • \ ' R.O. W. I DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFlED ON PLAN ~U TTER ~ FLOWLJNE 0 : TOP OF BERM ELEV. = CIJRB INLET - I TOP OF CURB ELEV. ~+.20 FT. 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD . OLLED ~ INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH CURB - . I OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER ~ NORMAL GUTTER LINE r 3:1 (TYP) - t.~J 3:1 ( lYP ) • . , - .5' * • , . . . ; ! *DlMEN510N IS TO POND BOTTOM CONCRETE APRON AQER TOPSOIL AND SOD . 4" THICK P.C.C. _ HAS BEEN INSTALLED. 1.5°t SOD ON TOPSOIL SECTIONAL VIEVV 1" MIN. TOPSOlL ON GRADED PONO BOTTOM - TYPlCAL '208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE waskr ' ~ 13037 ~ . o ' ~SrONAL~G EXPIRES osllli INLAND PACIFIC TU R LTE C R EEK FI RST AD D 1T10 N ENGINEERING 707 west 71h - suite 200 (509) 458-68ao pqTE: 11 /19 /97 ; \ Spokane. WA 99204 FAX; (509) 458-68 44 \ r ` ~ ~ ~ STA. 24+69, RT. . 4' TYPE 1 CURB ~NLET WITH 5~ APRON BOTTOM ELEV. = 2076.90 T.C. ELEV. = 2077.73 AND BOTTOM AREA = 330 S.F. TYPE 2 CURB INLET TOP OF BERM = 2077.73 T.C. ELEV. = 2077.73 VOLUME PROVIDED = 165 C.F. TYPE `R' CUR6 Sth AVE. PLAT BOUNDARY ~ 5' PLANTING STRIP Pc,.~r . ,x : , y ~~-:a.i~ ~ --={r-~.-~'~~ '~iia a+ '~~i"w~+'A"i'~'+a~.~+.'t4$ '~E'~`+' _ Fs u':.~~.-;, wrnr ♦ ~ i nPn~ ~ i r ~ 1~'', -~~e.~l~ Iwl ~M Ai~M 1. .Yiu"7 - , r _'~4.. ~'•.r..:~ua' ^ { e~v " ' _ " '==3•s ~ ` ~ f ` A' ' ✓ • :~?'y~~~"s~~ Si~ Y ~ ~ . ~ro ~~a~r..: - _ ""~.as'_:3~''c-'~ 'e ? A _i.~~~ _ _ I _-s_~-s~ _ n ~ ~ 84.04 ~.5 ' ~ . , Q ' . . 5.50 WIDE SIDEWALK ~ . ~ . . 14.5 , . J -~.M_ • ~ N~ . ~ rJ N~ ' , . . IO . . ~ ~ ~ r ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT 2 . ~:I ~ o . ~ , . ~ ~6 ~ '7 ~ ~ l ~.50 L.._ . ~ ~ . - - - . 1 . ~ . ~ . _ _ _ _ _ .....C ~ ~ 2 .'2 22 O~fi .J BOUNDARY OF FLAT LEVEL ' ° o POND BOTTOM AREA ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 20 . ~ . 4 2 ~ L. ~ ~ ~ 9 . P was o~ ~'r 0 G , ti 1' Q' r ♦ ~ y ~ ' • , ~ \ ti ~ 3037 ' F ~ ~ C(SI~ S G ~0 L~ NA . IRES 06/11l ~ EXP ~ , . ~ . . ` ~ 84.00' ~ ~ - . SCALE: 1 SCALE: 1 "=20' / / ~ ~ ` . . 7 ~ NLAND ~ ~ ~ ~ ACIFIC ~ NGINEERING ~o~ w~t ~tn • s~~te 200 (509) 458-6840 Spolcane, WA 99204 FqX: {509) 458-6844 DATE: 10~2/ ~ ~ kTE: 10/27/97 J s . ~ ~ R.O.W. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECiFIED ON PLAN ~UTTER ~ FLOWLlNE 0 TOP OF BERM ELEV. = CURB INLET I TOP OF CURB ELEV. ~+•20 FT- 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD OLLED ~ INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH CURB • I OCCUPANCY 0F ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER 3: ~(TY NORMAL GUTTEk L1NE r ~ 3:1 (TYP) , - .5'* ,;:i:~`: •r:. ral- *DIMENSION IS TO POND BOTTOM CONCRE7E APRON eQEB TOPSOIL AND SOD 4" THICK P.C.C. _ HAS BEEN INSTALLED. 1.5"t SOD ON TOPSOIL SECTIONAL VIEYV 1" MIN. TOPSOIL ON GRADED POND BOTTOM TYPICAL 9 208 POND WiTHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE - ~ oF WASkr - ~ A~ ' . ~ . ' 13037 . O ~FCISTE~~ CS~ • ~SrONAL~G ' D(PIRES 06/1t/ ~ \ J INLAND PACiFic TU R LTE C R EEK FI RST AD D ITI 0 N ENGINEERINC3 . 707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 11 /19/97 ~ Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ` ~ • . ~ ~ STA. 28+94, RT. B~TT~~1 ELEV. - 267~.33 , ~ 4 TY~E 1 CURB II~~E~ WITH 5 APRO~ BO~TOM AREA = 73~ S,F~. T.C. E~.EV. _ ~078.4T ANR TOP ~F BER~ _ ~~77.76 TYPE ~ CUR~ ~NLE~ V4LUME PROVfD~D = ~68 ~.F. T, C, ~LEV. = 247$, 47 . TYPE 'R' CURB 8th AV~. I - ~ PLAT B~UNQARY ~ 5' PLAN~iNG S~RIP r- - , - - . .z z . ~ ~ - , , r -~c BEIGE STA. 1~~5~ RT. - - - -.~-F-=~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' ' - _ _ " _ ~ , ~ ' ~ ~~F . _:s- . -g~t"-.'-- - ~,i ~:r..~„ ' "s'...~~s'. _r_ ~r..= ...y.. 4 T1~E ~ C~1~~ I~L~T ` I- ~ 7~.00 EL.~V. - 2077.5fi ~ ~ 5.50° ~IDE SBDEWALK ~ _ l ~ y r.._ , . ~ 13.5a UTILIZI' EASEMENT /.~1~ , . _...1' ~A' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , BEIGE STA. 1~~+55! 24 RT. to.$~ f ~ ~ S~OKAN~ CQ~~TY STANRARp :~o • ~ ~ e , _ ~RAINAGE EA~EM~NT A R~` L Wll~i ~ - I ~E D W~ I~; •r ' I TYPE ~4 h~~~AL FRAME & GRATE ~ • I . , - - ~ ~ ~LEV. = 2076.83 - - ! ~ > ~ E , ~ I ~ , , 3S EUlL~ING SETBACK ~ - . 3~..,_.,, .J l...... . . . . ~ti n~~• ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ } 1 ' 4.75~ . . ~ . r~ , i ~ . . ~ ARY OF FLAT ~EV'EL BOUN~ , ~ti ~ . . • PD~I~ ~~~T~M AR~A 4'y` : - ` • . . . ti ~ l I ~ ! ~ ~ t ti ~ Ii.! I : p ~ , `I YJ ~ •S 11 ! I . k r ~ I ~ , a ~ : l~ s W~ l p y. ~ Ij] . .r.r'r . ~ ~ ~I ~m~.~~ r. J rF- : r' . ~ F ~ ~ , I , . ~ ,~f vr : • ~ ~ ~ ~1 W ~ f ~ ~ „ o ~r r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r f . ~ ~ W~s~# C~ ; _ , o - ~ f ~ I f J• ~ 1.~ , _ I r ~ • ~r ~ m ~ , s c'] f`i . .l~ I ~F O : , ~ry ' f . y fN r I ~ I ~ ~Y . 3037 , , ~ ; f~l I ~r f ~ : . ~ p ~G1,~ ~ , . rr G s . f . to . , t~,~ , , .i ~ ~ r f~ - ~ ~y 46l11f r i~~s I . CR~ ~i ' ~ ' ~ • f~' ~ 1 . r'~ ~ f1 ' r . ~ . ~ ~ SCALE: 1"=2~' f{.~ ~ _E: 1"=20' ~ , . rrr r -M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~~FI~ ' NGIN~E~l~V~ 7~F Wast 7th • s~,~t~ ~aa ~sa-s~ao ~~T~: ~0~4~~, wn ~saoa ~nx: ~~a~) a~a--s$a~ ~ _ ~ , - . JE: 9 f9 f 97 ~ '/00 • ~ R.O.W. ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN GUTTER ~ - TOP OF BERM ELEV. FLOWUNE 0 = I TOP OF CURB ELEV. CURB INLET ~+.20 FT. 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL, SOD - OLIED ~ INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH CURB . • ( OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER NORMAL GUTTER LINE r ~ 3:1 (TYP) ,r,. ~ ~ 3:1 (TYP) .1, , - *DIMEN510N IS TO POND BOTTOM CONCRETE APRON eFTER TOPSOIL AND SOD 4" THICK P.C.C. HAS BEEN INSTALLED. 1.5"f SOD ON TOPSOIL SECTIONAL VIElN 1" MIN. TOPSOiL ON GRADED POND 60TfOM TYPICAL 1208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE G~ oF wAs 1 ~ l~t . - 13037 . O ~FCISTE~~ CS~. ~SrONAL IXPIRES 06/11/ IV I NLAND PACiFtc TU R LTE C R EEK FI RST AD D ITI O N ENGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 11 /19/97 , \ Spokone, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ \ 1 . 1 STA. 31+41, RT. 4' TYPE 1 CURB INLET WITH 5' APRON BOTTOM ELEV. = 2078.87 T.C. ELEV. = 2079.70 AND BOTTOM AREA = 360 S.F. ~ TYPE 2 CURB INLET TOP OF BERM = 2079.90 - - - T.C. ELEV. - 2079.70 VOLUME PROVIDED = 180 C.F. , , TYPE R CURB 8th AVE. PLAT BOUNDARY i 5' PLANTING STRIP ,~~~~~~~x~~ ; ~ a - r~ , i~d y, - ~.~t^ ,r l ~ri rr ' re ~_nrs.'~ _ - ~fQ ' ~A~` . - e - ' " - :f~` ..3~~="-,'~`k„...g~,?`_'? ' . 4-~ Y _ ' E~,. . .,Q. i t--n ~ y ~ ~ ~ 8~.~~ a0 , ~ . 5.50 WIDE SIDEWALK ~ ~ 7.50, , ~~i, ' _ _ ` _ 13.50 WIDE UTIUTY EASEMENT _ , _ _ ~ : - - ~ - - ; i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o . u~ ~ ~ tt ( ~ ~n IO N C: ri DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~ • ~ I ¢ ~ I 9 . ~ ~ 7.50' 7.50'; ~ ...................35. BUILDING.SEIBACK..........................1 ~ ~ : ~ 14.50'. . ' J ,.~U BOUNDARY OF FLAT, LEVEL POND BOTTOM AREA b o 0 0 ~ ' N ~ r- ~ 3 3 ,r., r„_: ~ L. ' ~ A r' ~ , '1 • . i P s F wAS~r G o 0 ti~w . ~ ~ . ~ _ _ ~ , , ti • , ~ . ~d~ , ~ t 3037 0 0 FC fSi~ . S ~ ~ ~ONAL~ ~ H7.OO' ~ ' EXPIRES o6111/ 0~ 2 . ~ N. ~ SCALE: 1 "=20' 20' ` . ~ ~ . 7 ~ NLAND . ACIFIC ~ NGINEERING 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (549) 458-6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 . ~ / DATE. 10/27~ 'E: 10/27/97 J i ~ R.O. W. DRAINAGE EASEMENT AS SPECIFlED ON PLAN IlUTTER ~ FLOWUNE 0 TOP OF BERM ELEV. _ I TOP OF CURB ELEV. CURB INLFT •20 FT• 1.5" SOD ON TOPSOIL. SOD OLIED ~ INSTALLED CONCURRENT WITH CURB • . . I OCCUPANCY OF ADJACENT HOUSE GUTTER 3: 1 (TYP) NORMAL GUTTER LINE ~ 3:1 (lYP) .5'* , ~ .t;~•~ . CONCRETE APRON * DIMEN51QN IS TO POND 80TTOM 8FTER TOPSOIL AND SOD . 4" THlCK P.C.C. . ' HAS BEEJV INSTALLED. 1.5°f SOD ON TOPSOIL SECTIONAL V1EW 1" MlN. TOPSOIL ON GRADED PONO BOTTOM ~ TYPlCAL 9208' POND WITHOUT DRAINAGE STRUCTl1RE NOT TO 5CALF oF w As r , 13037 . O ~FCISTE~~ C~ . ~SrorvAL~'~ . EXPIRES 06/11/ 100 ~ I NLAND PACiFic TU R LTE C R EEK FI RST AD D ITI O N ENGINEERING 707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 11 /19/97 ` Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ ~ ~ ~ STA. 31+41, RT. 4' TYPE 1 CURB INLET AND 5' APRON BOTTOM ELEV. = 2078.87 T.C. ELEV. = 2079.70 AND BOTTOM AREA = 360 S.F. TYPE 2 CURB INLET TOP OF BERM = 2079.94 T.C. ELEV. = 2079.70 , VOLUM~ PROVIDED = 180~ C.F. ~ ~ PLAT BOUNDARY 8th AVE. TYPE `R' CURB . ~ , , 5' PLANTING STRIP _ .,_f ~ _ - ,~--'~~?f~'~'~ ~ - - ' i n r ~ i v x~~ ~n~, , i~ ' y 'r':~L:.~`*:ide3' 1 ~.:r:v; K v . ' ` .-Y~ '4 rf'i+ r'1~'°' vti}Yr , i v_.. . _ ' . . . r ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ a_..::-~i:: .ti. . - .e+ ~ 88.00 ~ , I ~ - 5.50 WIDE SIDEWALK ; ' 7.SC~ 7.50' , ~ ` I 13.50 WIDE UTiLITY EASEMENT . • 1 ..._r-.------------- . ~ ~ ' ' . Vi IO L~ ; ~ ~~t d`'~ 1fj r: ~`1, I O u; . f ' ' ~ DRAINAGE EASEMENT , I ~ . I ~ , , , ~ I ; ~,s~?' ~.so' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . ....35' BUILDING. SETBACK.......... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ - . . , r. . ' F.~ , . . , ~ :4.,.~.. 14.50 ~ ~ BOUNDARY OF FLAT LEVEL `4 ~ POND BOTTOM AREA ~ ~ o . o o o . ~ . . ~ ~i • ~ ~ _ ~ ~ 4 3 ~ 1G , L. ~ ~ ~ P A ~ w sr~r . 0 0 G ti ~ti ~a . ~ ~ - " ~ ~ . . ~ , . . - ~ _ ~ - - . . , ~ 13037 ' ~ R 0 Fc ~ , U , G G~ ~ . sT 2 ONAL~ EXPIRES o611 U $ 88.00' ~ a . SCALE: 1 "=2C ~ , 1 C• 1 "-')!1' -y - - ~ ~ ~ ~ NLAND . 1 ACIFIC ~ NGINEERING ~ 707 West 7th • Suite 200 (5Q9) 458-6840 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844 ~ / DATE: 10/27, TE: 10/27/97 ~ ~ . R. Q.VY. ~ DRAIhIAGE F-ASEMfNT AS SPECIFIED ON PLAN ~ GUTTER FLOWLJNE 0 TOP QF BERM ELEV. ~ IToP oF cURa El Fv. cURB INLET .20 FT_ 1.5* SOD ON TOPSOIL, SQQ OLLED - . ~ IEVSTALLEQ CONCIJRREHT WI7H ~ CURB dc _ • I OCCUPANCY 4F ADJACENT HpUSE GUTTER - 3; ~ (TYP) n~~RMAL GurrER LiNE ~ 3;1 (TYP) iyi'•-•~' *N14'1GNSFON ES TkJ P3JND 'ROF I V1R LON4.Ih~TE APfL~~ AFrE$ TOP$O1L AMD S0D 4" 7HIGK P.C.C. • : HAS BEE7V LNSTALLED. 1.5°t SOD ON TC3PSOIL . 5~C'nONAL lIIEW 3" WN_ TOPSOIL Oh! cRAaEo PoND BorTOM TYPICAL '208' POND WTHOUT DRAINAGE STRI~CTURE NQ7 TO SCALE ' WAs 4k, .r i3037 . O ~~ta~AL . ~ - EXFIf4ES 06f 11 f INLAhID P~~~~~~ TU R LTE Cl~EEK FIF~ST AD[~ITIO~1 EN~~~~~~ING 707 west 7tn • su;te 200 (509) 458-6840 ~ D►qTE: 1 i f19 f 97 ~ . ~Spokane, WA 99204 FA3(: (549) 45$-6844.40, f i SY~r ka.n0"0 e p ..;00OValley 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.688.0239 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0295 ♦ hrCspokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: June 2, 2009 To: File ` ~ . I From: CarrikW.,osta, Deputy City Clerk Re: Moldy documents: P1753 Turtle Creek Sontl 15t Add Due to a water pipe breaking in City Hall's basement sometime last year, we are now discovering that several files contain documents with mold on them. The State Archivist Office confirmed with our City Clerk that we should make copies of, then destroy all moldy documents and make a not in the file; that is the purpose of this memorandum. The documents within this file are merely copies of documents which had mold and are now clean and can be handled without concern of contamination. The following lists the original documents which were copied, then destroyed: • Turtle Creek First Addition; 8th Avenue/Long Road Right-of-Way Plan approved for P1753 on 6/08/99, Sheet 7A of 7, job number 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition Cover Street, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 1 of 7, job number 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 2 of 7, job number 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition 8th Avenue STA. 10+00 to 22+00, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 3 of 7, job number 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition 8th Avenue STA. 22+00 to Barker Road, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 4 of 7, job number 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition Greenacres Road Beige Road, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 5 of 7, job number 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition Drainage Details, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 6 of 7, job number 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition Drainage Details, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 7 of 7, job 97105 • Turtle Creek First Addition 8th Avenue/Long Road Right-of-Way Plan, dated 11/26/97, Sheet 7A of 7, job number 97105 O' ?AA-4 . LJ` t y~ ~ 1' ~ ~ `ry t f~~' t ~ 1~,1 ~ ' ~r^~' • V` % i~ y' ;11 y n ry 1, 4 u ~ ey~ , 1' .~,,i, r ,i~/E': 'yc ~ ' ' ~ l ~ 1/ r `t~ 4 ''r. ~1,', 4+ " j t ~ , . . • Q, kti . ~1}( ; . , r ^~"`~~l ~ ~ ~ l 1 ~ , r ~ ' • `u 4 ~ V• ~,'t. ! Il ~ j~l ~ ~ I. ` t~ i„ 1 ~ ~ 1 \ ~ I 't ~~A1 w L ~ i.Yu ! \ ~ i O . . J f ~ t , ~f',j ,1 / .nr ' ~ 'P ,f, ~ • ~ i . . ; ' i ~ . 0.1 ,~i i" N ~a Nt ~,'yY~'~ ~ ~ y i" . , Y ' ~ ~ \ .'11~ f + i//~~► N~ ~ 1•~ 1 ~~!1 Iw; .,~~i ,~3' }~!'"'~:f.t1 ~ , ~ 1y~ ~ ~v ~1VS17' l~t"1. \ ;~I ,M^~- ~ll`1j a',,~ ; 12, A 4 ' ~ , :e, ~ t,, : ~ r , ~ ~ li+ ~1t4 ~ 1 ( 1 , - ~ M ~ e ~ trii~ ,~4 ~ \ t /~n . , •~,li r' . ' , , , . ~ f ^,1~f H~ 1~, ~ 7 ' { Y/ ~ 4 ' ~ ~ ' 3t ~ , Fr1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ i ~ ~ , , ~ ~ I~ t 1 J,; , ~ ~ t • ~l~~, • , • %~JY,.6 ,~t , ~ i~j„1 ~t ~~1' r ~1 I ~11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t . ~ ` i,: ~ . . ~ .r 4 , : O' , w ~ ~ t , ~ ~,l •r , i. i 'I ~ ' \ ~ '~f ,v ~ ~ ~ , wb' ~1' ~ ~ r. ~ 1~~~~. i~ ~ ~ , 1'!1 1/"~ J~ 1i 1j ~ 1 ~ y' f~C=~ 1~~, ~ t' 1 ` - O„y^ ' ! f l'~~ ' ~i/. 't I' 0. •''t ' • , , . ~ ~ ;~lY f ' ~ ~ ~ 1• , , ' ~ ~ fi~~~ •J;~ n ~ ~ ' , , ~ i ~ / > ~ ~~1 l ~ 'l~ ~ rl~ •`,~1'~ ~ w, ''~y~r~"` o - ~i' ~ , 1~ ~ , ! j• 1•~ 1 1 • ~ . • ' ~f ~ T~ t. ~ •T , , ~ ~ , ,r ti,,, " . ~ J i ~ 2 ~ dV ; { _ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ti t ~ "+y~. T~ l ~ ~ • ~ '1 a ~ • yL ~ t ! ' ~S . , ~ ` , • . ~ ~ • ~ ~t S ~~r+~t~~~ . ~ µ ~L~. , ~y 1 { i ~.7\ A ` r. ~ , i , , ' ~ ~ I ^ 1 woo ' j1~'.(1' i~f, " . r•~~, ~ f~ , h.P ~ .r:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r '4` . ~ ~ ~ ` `'i ~ ~ ! ~ i • , { ~ ~,~`~1 f; ~ ~ ` ~~o p;~' ~ ' ~ j , ~ = .i .~1t`' , ~ ~t ' ~ 1 ' v .J p ~ . ' • ' d ~ 4 ~ 7 ' ~ ~ t r . f' ~C . ~/r 1 , ' ~`,.\1' ~ ~ •1 ~ 1 rt: J I ~ , }1, , Jw~`. ~ ~G, W~ r l~.t, ,f~ 1 ~'r ~r. ~ , ~ ° f ~1 f ~ f\ ~ i•~ .t ~ . Y ~f t , i 1 ` ,1 ` ~ ~ ~ •'i , i~i ~ ,~~y, ~ , '1 , ' ~ ~,i. . f • t r . ' {i~. , Y ' • .7` • . , ~ f , ~ ` t ~ i t~ ~ ~ • ~ }V ~ ~ t. 4 •r ti ' , r j• r ~ I \ , o'~ 't ' { ~ 1. . ~I -i t" . . ! t ~ 1 . ~ ~ . ~ y ( t~ 1 I ~ ,~i,. _ ~ f : 1 A : ~ t ~ ` • v • ' ' 4 . , M , ti'~ ' . A . ' ~i 1 ;~1.~ ~ rk ~ ~ ~ f ~ .l J ~ ~4 ~ ~ ;t! , ,C Mr ~ ' + ~ ~,;,Y ~ • . 1 a , I ~ - ) ~ i j, ~ `P~ '~t • .f l.. ~ t t~. 1~ ~ ~ , r~~ Y, ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~'%~A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~. ~~I ~ ~ t • •r ti I, J ~ ~ ,1' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , ° ~ t'~ ~ • ~ ` . 1 ~ ~ . , 7 1(~ .1~ ~t b' a ~L:,1 t,~ v ~~i~ ~~iN .1\ ' : y? ' ~ r+ . `y ~ j + r i' ~ ' 1, i ~ ,.1,~' 1.` l~ ~ ~ . r , ~ f, ~ ~ , . , ti \rt * - 1 , ' . ~ , ~ ; 'a\ ~ y~^~ ~ \ r . , 9' ~t' ~ ~ vi ; . , i , • / ~ _ ^ ~ , 1 l~ ~ ' ~t d ~ '4(~~ r . , 'r' ~f'~~ ~ . , . , 11 - . ~ , • . . { ~ ~ ' c ,'~`.`,t ~ •,j ~1 ~ , A~, ~i~ky~~7 1~J"~1 ~ }~i 1 J . ;T - n ' ~ ~ ` ~ y ~ f•`~ . ~ . `1~ i~/,~ , ' . , , ' I ) ' f ` , ~.r ~t',~ - it.,~~~,,1'. t t~ . , _ ~ ; j ~ Sl.• , f~ ' z ' I~ ' , • ' ' ° c ~ ' ~ , ~ ' ' ' ' ~ i~"~ ~ , . .1 > k' y ' ' ~ ~ S~ ~ ' ' "14 , d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ' i\•1 ~ ' ''ri 1/ . ~1,/ ~ ~ ` ' , i A ~ - . ~1 • f ~ ~ . / . , ' ' f r ' . ' ~ ' i , . , ~i, ~r ~ , ~ t . , . , 1 ~ , , ~r~ i ~ ' 1 . , , << , - i ~ ` . ~ , ~ f , i° ~ ; . z , ~ ~ , • f , . ~ ~ uC ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f~ y ~ ' ~ ~ I~ ( ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~i,. ~ ~ ~ . • E . ~ , t ' , , .i i. ~ ~ G) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.r • ~ ; ' ~ 1 ~,v „ I ' , ' ' ~ t', .r'--' t 'E h,, • ~i ~ f';~,' 1 1 ) . ' ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 t ' t~ i . ~ + 1~~~ . Fl~ :y ' p . It` J j'rZ'•'~1~''.C"~? w~~y`, . ~ ' 1 . ~ :A . . 1~. 1 ' ~ ji ~r X` ~ ~ ~ i j ' ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~`l r"~ ~ ~r ~ 'i _ I. ,r ~ ~r ~ „ . . i ' ~ , ' , , r ) , ~ ~ N . ~ ~ r. •i ) t' 'C . ,h ~ ~ t ! + , , f I ~ Ji . ~ ; ~ ~ y~ J t 4 , ~ t ~ • . • v~ , , ~ , 7 ' t ~ ~ ~ ? . ~ I.~i.:'v . ~ ~ i~. ~ N. A ~1/ ~ti ~~i~ , ti~'~~~5~ , ~ ~~'L _ ! i~~~ • ~ ~ ~ i~ + ~tr1~ ,I,t a.r. ~'~~1~~J'J<<,':;`~" .,3~1~,t.;,4~ t ~ . ~ti, . '~1 , r t , d ~~l R'~, • 1 i Y' 11' ' , ~ 1 r'. ~ , . ! , , ~ . : ` ~ ,1: ` 11~ ~-f~ ~f t '~t ~1,~ti r~}~ y ~l.+r 'f t ) t ` , ! ~ i,/ t `r% r , ~ .1 . • - • y ,~t'i ~ f ~ u . ' a i~~ ~y ~ . "e ~"1'# ; - , ^R,^- , i ~ ~ ~ f~ , ~ a ~ a , r~ i . ~ • y ' i J ! ~ ~ ~ . . ' 1 ~ , , , ' , , ~ . ~ ~1 H ~ , ~ . ~r ~ "~1 ' ~ ~ti ~ ' t, ~ ~ t' ~ I 1, 1_ n J; ; ~ , ~ , •j ~ f . ~ , , . ~ ~ ~ . ! i , . ' I • .e ; 1 r'; i. , ~ 1~ . ~ :L~t t`-f ~ ~ , . ~ , ~ 1 , ~ „ , ' ~ , • , ~ ! •z o.r ~ ~ r ` Z ~"^,,"1' ; y t• . , , ~ `ti, ~ , ~ ' , ~ j ~ ~r . , r 1 ~ . ~ ' C i ~ ~ f i . ' " ~ it t ,'~ti,a ~ , L ~ ~ ~ • ` ~ ~ . , ~ r 1 y . 1 . ~ .r. 1 ~ r, _ ' ~ ~ I• ,~yfn / ~ ~M1 ~ ~ ~ ~r+ , i • ` ~ , , ~ [ ' , ' ~ • .,l ~ ~ -'r ~ , ~ P . f • ~ , . , 1 , . 7t ` ~ ~ i~~~~1~~ ~ ' yr .~~n.{ ~t { 1` l.,' \'11 ~ yn,.~~t~ ~ J~'r~d'' ~ , r 1 i, r~~ 1 ) n ' o'? ,.t.`,{~,- ,~~~t,' , 1 ` ~ . i ,~f . ~ 1i'J i1~~~~.M, ryy,~.~^ • i~, p t ~ ~ , 1 ~ t' ' / i ~ d'~ f , ~ , ~ , ~ '"1 ' • t . ~cs~-, k• 4' ,~t+t.L;, ~ ` f f V - ~ ' 1 li~ " . ,'1 ~ i• l~, 1 ! rI ` r S ~~M1.~ _ ~ , i > ` y '1 . ~ ^ 1''~~`t tryJ~.w+~'° ~ ~ 1 i~ ' ~ •r` ,'~i 'ti 1 ' 4~ . • ' ' 1~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ \ r~ a. ~ 1 ~•f~ . t. . . ~ l; ~ `yy~~ J~w ~ - + S " C I +Y! }',~r~s'~.~`."•,- na ~ ~ ~ • ' . . 1 . ~.s.~ ~~i~,..~erF,xi[LJ~ FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX B TU RTLE CREEK LEAD AGENCY: ' SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ^PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH: - WASHINGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1971, CHAPTER 43.21 C REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON - REVISED SEPA GUIDELINES, EFFECTIVE APRIL 4, 1984, CHAPTER 197-11, WASHINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE CODE - SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 1984 PREPARED BY: RAMM ASSOCIATES, INC. SOUTH 25 ALTAMONT SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 SEPTEMBER 1996 ~ - ~ - INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. March 1, 1996 RECEIVED SPOKANE C0UNTY W.O. No. 94221 MaR o 4 1996 John Pederson Spokane County Division of Building & Planning 0IVISION OF BUILDMtQqNp pLANNINC W. 1026 Broadway -A', Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Comments to Turtle Creek Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear IVir. Pederson: In reading through the draft environmental impact statement, there are some inconsistencies in the transportation section. Under Mitigating Measwes for the Proposed Action Alternative, the mitigation spelled out under Stand Alone Mitigation on page 55 does not follow from the information presented under Significant Impacts for the Proposed Action Alternative. Page 55, in part says: Turtle Creek & Riverwalk: Under this scenario, Turtle Creek could be conditioned to install'the _ signal at the eastbound I-90 ramp terminal intersection with Barker Road. If this improvement has already been installed, no further mitigation would be needed. According to Table 6, which is a summary of the traffic analysis and calculations for this scenario, no mitigation would be required. Since the analysis and calculations are correct but the above paragraph does not reflect the correct situation, the paragraph should be revised as follows: Turtle Creek & Riverwalk: With full build out of Turtle Creek and the currently approved projects in the surrounding area as anticipated in three years, no additional mitigation is required. Similarly on page 55, the next paragraph says: Turtle Creek, Riverwalk & Morningside Heights: If these three developments continue, it is anticipated that not oniy will the signal at the eastbound I-90 ramp terminal intersection with Barker Road be needed, but southbound channelization at the westbound I-90 ramp terminal intersection will also be needed. Since the southbound right turn lane would benefit Riverwalk more than either the Turtle Creek or Morningside Heights projects, it is recommended that . Riverwalk install this channelization. The signal at the eastbound ramp terminal could then be a condition of the Turtle Creek plat. . Table 7 in the Significant Impacts section, which includes more development than just these three projects, does not support the above conclusions. Since the analysis and calculations are correct, but the above paragraph does not reflect the correct situation, the paragraph should be as follows: 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509-458-6840 FAX: 509-458-6844 ~ UE1S C'ommtnts - i LmlC CretA . Marc h 1_ 1996 f'a(ye , 't'urtie (:reel:, Kive►•wMk S: ti'Iornin ;side Heights: lt'these ihree deveiopments continue_ it is anticipated that the signal at the easthound !-yU ramp terminal interseciion with t3ari:er Road wili be needed. Howev2r, this imprrn-ement is noz specificaliY attributabie ta Turt1e C'reel:, thereforz. ii is noi required as mitigation ior the project.. A finai inconsistenev in ihe document imJolves the next para~,~raph on pa(ve 55 which reads: 'l'urtle (:reeh, kiverwaik, N'lvrningside Heights & Nleadowview 'l'errace: it -ihese four developments continue, it is anticipated that not onl~~ \vill the signal at the easibound 1-90 ramp terminal intersection witn t3arker Road be needed and the southbounci channelization at the \vestbound 1-90 ramp tenninal intersection: but a signai at the westbound 1-90 ramp terminai intersection with 13arl:er Road wiil aiso be needed. Since the southbound right turn lane would benefit Kiverwaik more ihan Turile Creek. ~-IorninTside Hei(hts or Meado\~vti-ie~~-'1'errace, it is . recommended ihat Kiverwalk instail tliis channeiization. The siLynal at either the westbound or _ eastbound ramp ten-nina) could then be a condition of tne Turtie C.~reek plat. '1'able 7in the Si<Tnificant Impacts sectjon. wnich includes these four projects, does not suppon the above conclusions. Since the analysis and calculations are conect, but this paragraph does not ~ retlect the correct situation, the paragraph should be revised as foflows: urtle Creek, Riverwalk, Morningside Heights & Nleadowview Terrace: lf these four developments continue, it is anticipated that the siznal at the eastbound 1-90 ramp termina) iniersection with Barker Road NNfiil be needed. However this improvement is not specificaily re}ated to the development of'Furtie C:reel:; therefore; it is not requireo as mitigation for tne project. 'l'hanl: yrou for the opportunitv to comment on this pro)ect. Sincerell', . Ann L. Winkler, P.E. ALWiafxv cc: E'atti id,oT; kamm Associaies fZich llahrn, llahm llevelopment , _ F ERRATA TO THE BARKER ROAD TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND CORRIDOR STUDY i Prepai-eci for the Sponsors of: 7'vlorningside Heights: Rich Dahrn Meadowview Terrace: Clara Hepton Turtle Creek: Rich Dahm and incorporated into the Riverwalk TIA. - previously prepared by IPEC August, 1996 z Prepared By : ~ Inla nd Pa cific Engineering Compa ny 707 West 7#.h Suite 200 Spakane; WA 99204 - , (509)458-6840 a - , ~ ' f ~ ERRATA TO THE BARKER ROAD TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS AND CORRIDOR STUDY for the . Proposed Morningside Heights PUD Meadowview Terrace PUD . Turtle Creek and incorporated into the Riverwalk TIA previously prepared by IPEC August 1996 Prepared by: Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. West 707 7th Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 458-6840 This report has been prepared by the staff of Inland Pacific Engineering Company under the direction of the undersigned professional engineers whose seals and signatures appear hereon. 1,. W INk~ ~s - O ~ . • . x h• . 2~46'-~ 31398~ ~ ~I~IVAL F~G Ip N AL ~ EXPIRES 9/24 ~ EXPiRES 6/1/ q'1 • i Todd R. Whipple, P. E. Ann L. Winkler, P. E. ~ The information contained in these errata corrects the following minor discrepancies which have been noticed in the Barker Road Corridor Study. 1. On page 30 of the study, the percentages of tra.ffic for the "Jay Investment Properties" did not total to 100%. This clerical errar has now been corrected and Table 7 has been corrected to reflect the actual distribution used in the study. 2. On Figures 8 and 9, the volumes for Cataldo Avenue at Barker were inadvertently left off. New, revised Figures 8 and 9 are included here with the traffic volumes used in the study shown. These volumes were used in the study, but inadvertently left off the figure. Therefore, the levels of service were not affected by these changes. - ~ 3. Figures 10-13 show the traffic volumes which are expected for the subject projects and the background projects as described in the text of the study. Each of these figures had clerical errors, and each has been corrected here. The levels of service were calculated using the correct volumes as described in the text of the study, and are not affected by these changes. The levels of service calculated, and the conclusions and recommendations shown in the Barker - Road Comdor Study are not affected by the information included in these errata. These errata , contain information to correct minor clerical errors which have come to our attention since ~ publication of this document. , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ - i ~ . J Table 7- 7}~affic Distn'budon by Prnject . . . PROJECT To Sullivan Appleway Appleway I-90 east I-90 west North directly east of west of of Barker of Barker on Barker Barker Barker . Morningside Heights 40% 20% 0% 10% 25% 5% Turtle Creek 0% 20% 5% 10 % 60% 5% Meadowview Terrace 0% 20 % 10 % 20 % 45 % 5% ( Riverwalk 0% 20% 0% 10% 40% 30% I Meadowview Ranch 0% 20 % 10 % 20 % 45 % 5% Estates Jay Investment Co. 0% 20% 20% 10% 45% 5% UR-3.5 Property Good Samaritan 0% 10% 60% 10% 20% 0% Unidentified SR-1 & 0% 20% 20% 10% 45% 5% SRR-5 l~ .1 . Revised 8/22/96 Inland Pacrfic Engineering, Inc. 30 Barker Road 77A & Corridor Study ~ ~ WB I-90 RAMPS . ~ ~no$ g~ 86 amJ 24 81 CZP s czk, 22 23 ~ C CAA m ~ EB I-90 RAMPS ~ o~ 54 c:P ';k- 3 - 209 -C> a-143 11 cz~r ~ 22 ~ 9 !l " ~ ~ N APP LE~IIAY 11 ~ M - 4bb 13 ~ tIk, 108 24 ~ o- 48 12 ~ 8 a4~r N tC CCd ~ SPRAGUE AVE. ~ 0 o - 3 ~ Q ,7 w . o o- o Y 4 ~ ~5 ~ ~ 1 m NWN . OD 8th AVE. . i NOT TO SCALE ~ - ~ ! NLAND FiGURE 8 1 / - 1 PACIFIC 1995 BARKER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY ENGINEERING EXIST. A.M. PEAK HOUR 707 west 7tn • suite 200 (50e) 458-6840 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844/ ` TRAFFIC VO LU M ES J ` J ; WB I-90 RAMPS t'f N ~N~ Ni^D ~~1-t~ s 1 c~P ~ 0 22 228 ~ 7 rt ~ ~+26 ~5g-0 ~ °(A o° wv+ I EB i-90 RAMPS ~ , 38c:p 'Q 7 . 301 o- 32a • 21 ~ if 19 w~ ~ APPLEWAY s N 0~0 n 14 ~ tAk, 43 57 --p Q- 27 32 c: N, ~ 9 ' ~ :1" f !l" 46 :SPRAGUE AVE. 0 o - "incq, ~ . . .1 0 J, '1~* 15 W 1 o-o Y o ~ ~7 ~ . m . w(A . N - 8th AVE. . . ~ NOT TO SCALE ` - 0/ I NLAND a ~ FIGURE 9 PACIFIC 1995 BARKER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY ENGINEERINC3 EXIST. P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 458-6840 \'s~ka est WAh9g2p4e 200 FAX9)(549) 458-68440of ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES J` / WB I-90 RAMPS mN o ~ 28 J, 2, ~ ~ ~ aQ ~ - EB I-90 RAMPS omg 0 ~~~b ~14 ; 0 -p ~ 0 7 c:k, ~ 29 N Iv OD O 4+ W Oo APPLEWAY ~ ~ /00, o ~ ~o o o- 0 o ~a ~o 4~ oWo ~ - SPRAGUE AVE. . o o , 56 cP 411, 0 w o o- o Y o ~ ~o ~ m . ONO - G1D (71 . . 8th AVE. NOT TO SCALE \ J I NLAND FIGURE 1*0 PACIFIC SUBJECT PROJECTS RARKER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY ENGINEERING A.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 707 \ Spokane.t WAh99204e 200 FAX9,(5 9 458-6840 6844,, ~ TRAFFI C VO LU M ES J ` J , WB I-90 RAMPS V ~4 ~ 96 71 ~ 0 ~ 190 ~ 00 co EB I-90 RAMPS m ~to ~N~ ~ Q //4 ~ 48 o o- 0 24 100 a4~ ~ ~ U (A L" -06 O> APP LEWAY o o o ~ o-0 o ~ ~o ' O N O N P - SPRAGUE AVE. o tcV) o ~ . _ ~ 36 0 W o o- o Y . ° a Q . a4~ m 0-0 co • CD . 8th AVE. . . ~ NOT TO SCALE ~ ;0 I NLAND FlGURE 11 PACIFIC SUBJECT PROJECTS BMKER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY ENGINEERING P.M. PEAK HOUR TRqFF1C IMPACT ANALYSIS \'s~k ne t WA h 99204 c Zoo F~9>~s ~ 4sa 68"/ ~ TRAFFI C VO LU M ES . 1NB I-90 RAMPS om ~o ~b ~lv~ o . 0 C~p o///, 13 ~ 54 ~ a4 4~ o~, v ~v v EB I-90 RAMPS . ~ ~^o ~bb , Cfll ~o 23 cz~, If 24 ll~ f p Ol N CD V C tO fD APPLEWAY _ o N ~^AT~ V o ~ 'Q 0 o -q> o- 0 o czkr 4= o ll~ 4p o~o ~ - SPRAGUE AVE. 0 Q - N.- O cr on ~ - 4~~ ~ 64 4 4"a 19 L1J o o- o Y o cz~r ~o a am ONq~O - . W 8t h AVE. . NOT TO SCALE ~ -","m I NLAND FlGURE 12 . r PACIFIC BAC KG R 0 U N D P R OJ ECTS BARKER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY E NGINEERING P ROJ ECT A. M. P EAK H R 70 ~ west 7th • suite 200 (sos) asa-ssao TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS \ SDokane. WA 99204 FAX: (sos) 458-6844. ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES J\ ~ / \ WB I-90 RAMPS ON ~p - 0 ~ Q J, 44 c~, 187 c4~r - O~ ~►J W ~ A EB I-90 RAMPS - N . In w -NN 1 Cfil 0 ` o o- 0 . a, ~ ;fe3 ~co~ APPLEWAY w- ~ b . a ~ ~o o ~ o-0 o ~ p if o oNo v SPRAGUE AVE. . o - Q O 42 J' ~ 13 (1J o o-o Y o czkr ~o ~ m o-o . N 8th AVE. ~ NOT TO SCALE \ o/ I NLAND FIGURE 13 1 PACIFIC KG RO U N D P ROJ ECTS BARKER ROAD CORRIDOR STUDY A ENGINEERING PROJECT P.M. PEAK HR TRqFFIC IMPACT ANALY5IS `'s~ka e. WA h 99204 e Zoo FAX9)(59 ass 6844 ~ ~ TRAFFIC VOLUMES J\ o/ ~ EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 1-1 TURTLE CREEK • EXI9TIIIG CCINDITION3 AM PE.AK Turning Mov+ement Report Volle Northbouncl 3outhbound Lastbound Weatbound Tota1 Type Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right I,ef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Itight Volurrue #2 3altese b 3ullivan Base 0 278 24 34 80 0 '0 0 0 58 0 162 636 Ad,ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 . . Tota1 0 278 24 34 80 0 0 0 0 58 0 162 636 #6 8th 6 Harker Base 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 110 ' Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 110 #7 3prague b Barker Base 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 24 12 8 48 108 397 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 24 12 8 48 108 397 #8 Appleway b Barker Base 44 168 22 5 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 833 Add,ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 44 168 22 5 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 833 - #10 'WB Ramps b Bazker . Base 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 8 799 Addred 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 6 799 #ll Miesion 6 Barker Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #13 24th 6 3ullivan Base 6 331 6 15 91 18 90 16 0 8 116 118 815 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 6 331 6 15 91 18 90 16 0 8 116 i1B 815 #!la 16th 6 Sullivan ' Base 30 796 3 16 226 66 175 8 11 1 9 70 1410 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 30 796 3 16 226 66 175 8 11 1 9 70 1410 #15 4th 6 Sullivaa Base 28 1056 30 35 317 22 23 11 3 23 8 56 1611 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 28 1056 30 35 317 22 23 11 3 23 8 56 1611 - Traffix 3yatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ; ' Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Pag+e 1-2 TtTRTLE 'CREEK ' EXI3TIldG COiPIDITIONS . AM PEAK Volume Northbound Southbound ''Eastbound Westbound Total Type Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Voluaue #16 3prague & Sullivan " Base 125 758 152 110 298 146 188 234 56 97 302 142 2610 _ Add.ed 0 0' , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 Tcta1 125 758 152 110 298 146 188 234 56 97 302 142 2610 .,r~ . 1322 3prague & Appleway . Base 111 1 3 2 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 898 , • Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 111 1 3 2 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 898 .#25 TRErrT s BAxKEx Base 57 0 29 0 0 0 0 193 55 62 847 0 1243 . Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` Total 57 0 29 0 0 0 0 193 55 62 847 0 1243 #30 HARKER/EB I-90 Fi-MC3 Base 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 605 ' Ad,ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 Total 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 605 #55 3prague 6 Long Base 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 236 - Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 236 Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icenaed to Znland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 2-1 TURTLE CREEK EXI3TIIIG COAIDITIdNS AM PXAIC Inpact Analysis Report . I,ev+el Of Service , Intersection Baae Future Change , . Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in . i.os ven c Los ver, c . # 6 8th & Barker A 1.2 0.000 A 1.2 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ 7 3prague ~ Barker A 2.7 0.346 A 2.7 0.346 + 0.000 V/C # 8 Appleway 6 Barker B 14.8 0.351 B 14.8 0.351 + 0.000 D/V ' # 10 WB Raaips 6 Barker C 2.0 0.000 C 2.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 22 3prague ~ Appleway D 3.2 0.000 D 3.2 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 11 30 SARKER/EB I-90 RAmpS B 1.7 0.000 B 1.7 0.000 + 0.000 V/C - # 55 3prague 6 Long A 1.3 0.000 A 1.3 0.000 0.000 V/C Traffix systeat Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng • :.'e~7 , . ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 3-1 TURTLE CREEK ' EXISTnTG CONIDITIONS AM PEAK ' Level Of Service Caaputation Report _ 1994 F3CM Unsignalized Method (Future Volie Alternative) ,r**~rw**,tr►*~r***t:,r~*****,r~*~r~►*****w*,~,r**,►**,►,ts*s,r,~**,r,►,►*****:***~***,t******~***** ' Interaection #6 8th b Barker • ****frlrf*t*!*~lrr►*****w*tl~t***4****!***A**f~~s*:*!*t~t*t***11****ir*i1*ASir##*11tt***~,k Average Delay (sQC/Yeh) : 1.2 Wozst Caee Level Of service: A *f*sf**#***,t,r*~*t*,tt#*,t*~~,►**,r*~~r**r~**t~►,►,t,t,t,t::+t*ffrf**~~*,►,t*,~~+►*t~*~~:,►:~f**,►,► Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound Eaet Bound Weat Bound Mov+ement : L - T - R L - T - R I, T - R L - T - R ------------I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 9top Sign 3top 3ign ' Rights: Include Includ,e Includ,e Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0'0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I ---------------11 . Voltmtie Module: . Base Vol: 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 . Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 A,dded Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial E1.it: 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Rdj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 PHF Voltme: 2 47 2 16 32 0 4 0 5 6 0 21 R,educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina1 Vol.: 2 47 2 16 32 0 4 0 5 6 0 21 i Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cara : xCXc 31-oocx Ioooc >oooc ~ooot M= XXcNot XKXot $ Truck /Comb Mctx ,Coos Xcoc Xooc Xoooc "ICHDoc >oooc >CKXoc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl /Car PCE : Xooc XxoQC >CKXoc Xocx >o= >oooc Xooc XXooc Trck/Gmb PCE : Xt~oc 3oKXc Noocx >ooQC Xoot 3ooot .110co{ Adj Vol.: 3 47 2 18 32 0 4 0 5 7 0 23 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 NPH « MoveUp Time: 2.1 xoooc xooooc 2.1 xoooc xooooc 3. 4xoooc 2.6 3. 4xoooc 2.6 Cri tical Gp : 5. 0xoooc xooooc 5. 0xoooc xxxoc 6. 5xoooc 5.5 6.5 xxxx 5.5 ------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 32 xooc xooooc 49 xxxx xooooc 109 xoooc 32 101 xoooc 48 Potent Cap.: 1655 xooQC xxoooc 1624 xoooc xoacoc 915 xxxx 1334 925 xoooc 1309 Adj Cap : 1.0 0xocxoc xoooc 1. 0 0xoooc xooooc 0.97 xooc 1.00 0. 9 9xooos 1.00 Move Cap.: 1655 xooot xococc 1624 xxxx xooQOC 690 xxxx 1334 912 xoooc 1309 ------------I Level Of Service Module : 9 topped De1: 2. 2xoooc xooocx 2. 2xoooc xoQOOS 4.1 xoaoc 2.7 4. 0xooc 2.8 L03 by M+ove : A * * A 2r4ovpment : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - I,TR - RT I,T - I,TR - RT • 3hared Cap.: xxxx xococ xoQOOC xxxx xocos xoaoa xxxx 1099 xooocc xxxx 1191 xoQCas 3hrd 3 tPDel : xooooc xooQC xooQCt xooQCx xooQC xccoxs xooooc 3.3 xooQOC xaoooc 3.1 xooooc Sha.red LOB: * ♦ * * * * ~ A rr * A * ApproachDel: 0.1 0.8 3.3 3.1 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I.icenaed to Znland Pacific Bng Fri Aug 16, 1995 09:17:09 Page 4-1 TURTLE CREEK EXISTII;G CONDITIONS AM PF.AK • Lev+el Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Q-Way Stop Method (Eliture Volt~e Alternative) ****~***~~*w**w*rr**~,r,t*+►*t**t,t****,~tr~:**~**+ts~:tw,r~*~r,~***t►,t*rr**ttr~ef***,~:~~**~r~,r Interaection N7 3prague 6 Bazker - ,r,►,~**w***#f*****~w**,t,t****~*****~~e******w,►*,►*~~*tf,t*~~*~*t:~~~,►,r*t:t,►~~~t*****+r* GZicle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.346 I,oas Tim,e (sec) : 6 Average Delay (eec/veh) : 2.7 Optimal Gycle: . 0 Level Of 3ervice: A *:~~rt,►,r*w~,t*tr**~***,t**:~tc,t***,t,t***t,t*tr~,►****t,t***~*~r**,tt►**,r*,t*+r**,r*~**t*,t,c*t~rtf,~ . . Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound Irfovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------.I 11 ---------------11 Control: Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 9ign Righta: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I Vol,imm- Module : Base Vol: 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 24 12 8 48 108 Groovth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 24 12 8 48 108 Add,ed Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 - 24 12 8 48 108 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 - PHF Volume: 26 108 7 13 44 il 15 27 14 9 55 123 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 26 108 7 13 44 11 15 27 14 9 55 123 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -NLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 26 108 7 13 44 11 15 27 14 9 55 123 9aturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 636 636 636 563 563 563 600 600 600 540 540 540 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanea: 0.18 0.77 0.05 0.19 0.65 0.16 0.27 0.48 0.25 0.05 0.29 0.66 Final 3at.: 117 487 32 lOB 364 91 161 289 150 26 159 355 ------------I . Capacity Analyaia M,odule: Vol/3at: 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.35 0.35 0.35 Crit Movea• • t~** . ------------I Ioevel Of 3ervice Mbdule: Delay/Veh: 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 " AdjDel/Veh: 2.3 2.3 2.3 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 L03 by Move : A A A A A A A A A A A A **~**~***,t**:::tt~►~:~r*s~www**~,r***:wtw*******+~*~*w~**,r**~►*rr***t***~**t*w*~+rt*~r** Traffix 3ystem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Enq ~ . • : Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 5-1 T[7RTLE CREEK EXI3TING CONDITIONS AM PF.AK _ Level Of service Conputation Report . 1994 HCM Operationa.Method (Euture VolLmre Alternative) **t**tr*****f**~r~et******,t*~*#****#~r*~*+t*****s*~,►*:**:,►tw~****,r**~,t*t~~r~*~**,t**,r*,r ' Interaection #8 Appleway b Barker ***f:*~tt,r*w~***,~*~******~~*:*~~r,t*,t**,r*w*~**+►sw*~*~*~,t***~*****,r~**w*,►~rt~r*****~~# • , Gycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.351 I,oss Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Averag+e Delay (sec/veh) : 14.8 Optimal Gycle : 33 I,6..+~vel Of 3ervice : B , ,►**~~*~,t,r****+r*~*~*,t,r*+►**,t,►,►*~►,►**~***+~*,~*,r*,t,r,t***,►*t*,t*r,t**~~,►*~*~f~t,tt►*****,t*,t~ . Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R Z, - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------II - II Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I 11 . • Volie Module : Base Vol: 44 168 225 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 44 168 22 5 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 Aei.ded Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial E1it: 44 168 22 5 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.76 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 - PHF Volimue: 57 216 28 6 63 132 69 269 14 28 184 4 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 57216 28 6 63 132 69 269 14 28 184 4 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 bII.F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 Fiaa1 Vol.: 57 216 28 6 63 132 69 282 15 28 193 4 ------------~---------------11 9aturation Flow Module: 3at/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjus traent: 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.19 0.72 0.09 0.03 0.31 0.66 1.00 1.90 0.10 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final 8at.: 272 1031 134 45 473 990 1805 3572 190 1805 3723 77 II I Capacity Analysia Module: • Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.*02 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: **t* Green/Gycle: 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.34 0.34 Vol,-/Cap: 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.34 0.23 0.23 0.14 0.15 0.15 II II II I Level Of 3ervice Modvle: - Delay/Veh: 15.1 15.1 15.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 24.3 13:6 13.6 23.4 13.2 13.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . AdjDel/Veh: 15.1 15.1 15.1 13.1 13.1 13.1 24.3 13.6 13.6 23.4 13.2 13.2 Queue : 1 4 1 0 1 2 2 5 0 1 3 0 w**,t*:~:*,rt,r****rr****t******,r**+t,►,r,~**,r,r**t*~*t~s~r~r*****tr*~**~►*******~***~~s****~ Traffix systeqn Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng P . 1 . • t . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Pag+e 6-1 TURTLE CREEK EXI9Ta7G CONDITIo2J3 AM PE.AK . I,evel Of Service Detailed Coaputation Report 1994 HCri Operations Method . Euture Voltane Altemative ' •,r,r~r**~*~rr*~w~r*:~*:t~r****r►**~*►:****:*~**++~,r,rw,►***~:*~rrt******,~trr,r***,r**~~*~t*:f* Interaection #8 Appleway 6 Bazker ,~~s*trtt****ft~t*ttt*****~tr:::~r*****:~**::f:twt*,t*~r~rtrt****::*w*~t*~~wr~*~*~**~,►t~~~ Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound Weat Bound . Movemeat : I, - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I ---------------11 HGM Ops Adjuated I,ane Utilization Module: I,anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR I,TR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT #I►nslnGrpa : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ------------I ---------------11 -I HCH Ops Input 3aturation Adj Module: • Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grad,e: 0$ 0$ 0% 0$ Parking/Hr: No No No Na Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 AreaZype: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Other>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cnft Ped/er: 0 0 0 0 .ExclusiveRT: Includ,e Include Include Include $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 . ------------I ---------------11 HCM Opa f(rt) and f(lt) A,dj Case Module: f(rt) Case: 7 7 7 7 7 7 xoooc 5 5 xx)oc 5 5 f(1 t) Caee : 5• 5 5 5 5 5 1xoocx xoocc 1xQOOC xxaoc ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module: . Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00•1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hav Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Gra,de Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00~, Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xccc 1.00 1.00 iocQC 1.00 1.00 Bus stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoooc 1.00 1.00 xooc 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT A,dj : 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.81 0.81 0.81 xoQOt 0.99 0.99 xcxx 1.00 1.00 ZT Adj : 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 xococ xoooQC 0.95 xxoc xxxQc HCM 8at Adj: 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 _ Uar sat A+dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24LF 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 b'nl Sat Adj: 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 11 ---------------11 I( Delay Adjustment Factor MAdule: Coordinated: «<<<<<«<<<<<<No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3ignal Tyne: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 ~*,►****w~r~,r*f~r:**f*:***:****~:*~**#tr~t***~r*~+~**t*~r:w*w:*t**~t,►:,tw:***t**~**~+~~:: Traffix Systeaa Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I.icQneed to Inlaad Pacific Eng 3. ' • - Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 6-2 TURT'LE CREEK EXISTBJG CaNIDITIONS • AM PEAK Level Of 9ervice Detailed Caaputation Report (Permitted Left Turn 3at Adj) ' 1994 HCM Operations Method Elsture Volume A1 ternative • . *****tr~t+t**~*t~+►*~r~r****~rtr**,►+r,t,t*:*****,t**,tttr**rt,ttrt*****:*,r*:~r:*:,~:**,t**,r#**~,r~e**,t Intersection #8 Appleway & Barker ' t****~r*:~*wwt*tt►**~#******~*~►w**,t***~,►****w**,t:**:s*,►~,►***,t~*e**:~*t~t**t*tf*,~*** t.•,_ Approach: North 3outh East West , . Gycle Length, C: 90 90 xoQaooc XoooQOc Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 34.20 34.20 xxxxxx ,,oooooc • Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 34.20 34.20 xxocooc Xcoococ ' Opposing Effective Green Ti.me, go : 34.20 34.20 xoooooc Xoooooc Number Of Opposing Lanea, No : 1 1 xxoooc xoooQs Nimber Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xxooo~ 31ocx0noc Adj ua ted I,ef t-Turn Flow Rate, Vl t: 57 6 xxxxxx XXooQOc Proportion of I,eft Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.19 0.03 xooocxc XXcoooc Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.03 0.19 xxmoc XXooocx Left Turns Per Gycle, LTC: 1.43 0.15 xxxxxx >003ooc . Adjusted Oppoaing Flow Rate, Vo: 201 301 xcoooc xx2oooc ~ Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Gycle, Volc: 5.03 7.53 xxxxxx ~ooaoQC ~ Oppoaing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xoooooc 'Xxaotxx . Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xooQOOC xXoootx Eff grn until azrival of left-turn car, gf : 7.68 22 . 35 xxxxxx XXogooc i Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.62 0.62 xxooooc x0o3ooc Ef f qrn blocked by opposing queue, gq : 6.19 9.86 xoooQOC "ICKDooQc Eff grn while left turna filter thru, gu: 26.52 11.85 xoooQOC ~ot~oooc - Max opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xoooooc' xxxxxx Proportion of Oppoaing Thru 6 RT cars, ptho: 0.97 0.81 xxxxxx 300CHO-oc I,eft-turn 3aturation Factor, fs: .1000QOC 1100ooQC XXXXXoc Ioooooc Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: )oooooc %oocKxx ~oooooc ~oooooc Through-caz Equiva,lents, ell: 2.21 3.36 xoooooc -xxooQOc 3inqle Zane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xxooQC Xxcoooc Mirim++*+ Lef t Turn A,djus tment Factor, fmin : 0.07 0.06 xooQOOC MoOooc ' 9ingle Lane I,eft Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.85 0.98 xaooooc .1.0CN3ooc Left Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.85 0.98 xooooc MosDocc *~te*****t**~**#~**,►f~**r***t~tr******~*~*:~i**~r*~►~~~~,t*~*w***rr~*t*******,►#*~*t*tr,r Traffix 5yateQa Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I.icensed to Inland Pacific Eng .d . . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 7-1 ' TURTLE G'REEK EXI3TIIIG CC'JNDITIONS AM PEAK " Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Voliaoe Alternative) •*,r,►w****,r+r:*w*~~#+r*t*,r,►tr~rw*~r*t*w,t*~,r****,t**#tf******~r**t***:,t**~+t,r,t,r,r***~**~*,t* Interaection #10 WB Ftaaps 6 Barker *~*:~***w*rr***:~~*,r*,r*t~,►***w*****,t***,r****t*,t***rr*~,r**tr*,t*~**,~*~:t#*t***~f~,tftr,t , Av+erage Delay (sec/vQh) : 2.0 Worst Case I.evel Of SezVice: C *~t*,►,r*~*****,tt,r,tt****,t,t~t~ttr*****~e*~*~►*:~t*****t*+r***,t*~t**~****~►****w*~***ww**w* •Approach: North Bound South Hound East Bound Weat Bound . Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top Sign Stop 3ign Rights : Includ,e Include Includ,e Includ~e Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volt~ Module : . Base Vol: 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 8 , Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PasaerByVol: ,0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 8 Acid,ed Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Put: 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Voli-ke: 193 161 63 21 154 201 9 18 7 24 27 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Final Vol.: 193 161 63 21 154 201 9 1B 7 24 27 9 Adjusted Voliae Module : Grade: 0% 0$ 0% 0$ . $ Gycle/Care : xococ xxxx >oooc Xooc >oooc ,.oonc .143ooc 2otxx , $ Truck/Comb: >0oc XxoQt )0ctx Xooc - 210ocx XXoot Mooc -oKXos PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 . Gycl/Car PCE : . xooQC xooos %oooc xxxx IcaQC 31103oc >oooc Xocx Trck /0ab PCE : 30taoc 30nac X3= 30oc Xxoot >o= x0ooc >DOOC - Adj Vol.: 212 161 63 23 154 201 10 20 7 27 29 10 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3) : 30 NPH « . McveUp Time : 2.1 Xs3ot IloooQC 2.1 xooQC xxooc 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Cri ti cal Gp : 5. 0xxoc xooQOS 5. 0xooQC Jkoooc 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 ------------I 11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 355 xxxx xaoooc 224 xoooc xooooc 678 692 254 673 761 192 Potent Cap.: 1162 xooot xoQOOC 1341 xooos xooocx 429 473 1029 '432 435 1106 Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xxcosx 1.00 xoooc xxxcot 0.77 0.77 1.00 0.79 0.77 1.00 Mave Cap.: 1162 xxxx =oQC 1341 xxxx xnooQC 328 365 1029 340 336 1106 ------------I Irevel Of service Module: stopped De1: 3.7 xoooc =oocc 2.7 moot me= 11.3 10.4 3.5 11.4 11.6 3.3 L03 by Move : A * A * * * . ~ * * * Movement : I,T - I,TR - RT I,T - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT Shared Cap.: xoooc xxxx mccot xoooc xocQC =oQQC xcooc 405 x=ooc xoooc 377 =oooc . . shrd StpDel:xxoooc xoQC xooooc xxxocc aooQC xooQOC xxooot 9.7 xxxoz xeQOOt 11.4 xoootx Shared I,OS : B * * C * ApproachDel: 1.8 0.2 9.2 10.3- Traffix 3yatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Znland Pacific Eng .e 4 , . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Pay+e 8-1 TURTLE CREEK EXI3TING CONIDITIONS AM PEAC Level Of 9ervice Coazputation Report . 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Fliture Voltm~e Alternative) *:t~*+r**~►*,t**t**~~e,r,►,~*,►~e,~*******,r**~t**~*t**~:*~r,~,t**~***t***~,►**~►***,t~**~~r*,t*~,t*,~ - Intersection #i22 9prague 6 Appleway • *w:#~►*,r,r*,r~r,~:*~r:~►:t:~e~*+r~e::s**,~,r********+~tst~►**,t********~**~r*w*,►*,►*::**~**rr*w,►,t* , ' Average Delay (aec/v+eh) : 3.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: D . . *r*******,t,t~r~,►~~****+r,t*,t#**~~►:*~*,c*,r*****,rt**:**~►**,rtr**~**:******~*~t***t~~*tr,t,►,~ Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound ' Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R ------------I Control: 3top 3ign 3top 9ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights : Include Include Inclucie Include . Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I Volie Module : Base•Vol: 111 1 3 2 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tnitial Bse: 111 1 3 2 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 Added VOl: U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 U 0 Initial Eut: 111 1 3 2- 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.64 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 PHF Voltiuae: 132 1 4 2 1 8 6 374 84 1 445 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 132 1 4 2 1 B 6 374 84 1 445 7 ^ Adjusted Volt~e Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cara : 2ooot 20ocx X QOC x>ooc Xoot x0ooc xooot X)oot $ Truck /Comb : .10ooc 310oc 2oCoc xxxx 1oooc Xooc )cooc 1~ PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 ' Gycl/Car PCE : 31oooc JXXooc x'Coc ,oaot 10oos XXnoc .10ooc Trck/Cmb PG'E : .10ooc *oacx xxxx 3CcXoc 2coQC =ooc xooc xxxx Adj Vol.: 145 1 4 3 1 9 7 374 84 1 445 7 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 MPH « M+ov+eUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.1 xxooc 'xoooos 2.1 xxxx xxaocx Cri tical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 7.0 6.5 5.5 5. 5xcoQC aooooc 5. 5xoot xoocxx ------------I ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 873 875 229 832 914 226 452 xxxx xoooc 456 xoQOC xoococ Potent Cap.: 293 336 1060 311 319 1064 980 xxxx ,ooooc 973 xxxx xoooot Adj Cap : 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1. 0 0xoooc xoocxoc 1. 0 0xoooc xcooc Move Cap.: 287 332 1060 307 315 1064 980 xaoac xooQOC 973 xaQt xcxxc ------------I Zevel Of Service Module: 3topped Del: 23.0 10.9 3.4 11.8 11.5 3.4 3.7 xocxoc xoooac 3.7 xxxx xooooc L03 by Move: D ♦ : ~ * * A * A * * rtovpment: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT • Shared Cap. : xmot xxxx 685 xxxx 614 xxoQCC xocQC xcoec xooQOC xnaoc xxxx xootxx 3hrd 3tpDel:xcoooc xoooc 5.3 xxxQC 6.0 xxoocc ~noQOC xoooc ,oooQC xKxcc xxxx Moooc 3hared IA9: * * B * g * * * ~ * * * Approac23De1: 22.4 5.9 0.1 0.0 Traffix system Vesaion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng* ~ ~ * • - ' Fri Auq 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 9-1 TURTLE G'ItEEK EXIST327G CdNIDITICINS - AM PEAK - I,evel Of Service Catuputation Report 1994 HCM Uneignalized Method (Futvre Vol-loe Alternative) ****,t**~*,t*tt**~**,►**w*****~e*trr****~*r*trwt*****t***t~**,ttr~r~rtr**~s,t*~*+r~~r~,r,t,t,r**** Intersection #30 BARKER/EB I-90 Ft1MP3 • ~e**t*t~rlt,r~t!*~*~*~tt*t~**l~~,t*~t****~*~~**,t~*!***~r*rr***f**l~f1r*!**f*!rt*~~~tt**4**** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.7 Worst Caae I,evel Of service: B , **~r,►*****,►*,~r*~~***-**,r***~*,r*,r**~**~*~*~r**,r****~r***tt**tt,~**~~**,r*,r**~,c+►+~ww**t** Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound _ East Bolaid West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 9top Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module : Ba9e Vol: 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 . Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 Add,ed Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 0 345 9 46 100 0 Bl 1 23 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volt0 380 10 51 110 0 89 1 25 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Final Vol.: 0 380 10 51 110 0 89 1 25 0 0 0 _ Adj us ted Vol-ime Module : Grad,e: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ % Cycle/Cars : xaQOt xxxx xx= >ocHoc MQOC Xxcos ?°c'QC XO°t ' $ Truck/Comb : >Doc XcICK . >oQOC .10ooc XXXc >oQOC Xxoos >OCKX PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : '-oooc Xoot .143ooc 310oQt INooQC XXoQC xlooc xxxoc TrcJc/Cbb PCE : ~oQOC - ~oc~os >oooc >oooc xxxx 31CoM Xooc 2=oc • Adj Vol.: 0 380 10 56 110 0 98 1 28 0 0 0 Critical Gap M,odule: » Pcpulatioa: 300000 Run 9peed(N/S): 30 MPH « • MoveUp Time: xoccxc xxxx xooQQC 2.1 xxxx xoosx 3.4 3.3 2.6 xooocc xoooc xooosx Critical Gp:xoocxx xoooc xKxooc 5.0 xxxx xxQCx 6.5 6.0 5.5 xx)ooc xxxx xxoooc ------------I Capacity Module: . Cnf li c t Vo l: xxxx xaooc xoQOx 390 xoooc >ocaos 546 551 110 >oooc mooc =oooc Potent Cap.: xoooc xxxx xooooc 1117 xxxx xxxxc 511 561 1218 xoooc xoQOt xoooot Adj Cap: xoooc xooc xoocc 1.00 xooc xooocx 0.95 0.95 1.00 xoooc xxxx mcooc M+ove Cap.: xxxx xxxx 1117 xxxx 484 531 1218 x)ooc xioot xxxoc ------------I Ioevel Of 3ervice Module : s topped De1: xoccoc xooQC xooocc 3.4 xxxx xooQOC 9.1 6.8 3.0 xxKxoc xoaQC mo= LOS by Movc : * ~ * A * : * A * * Mov+esoent : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT . . 3hared Cap.: xxxx xocQS =ooos xccoc xxxx =cKac 484 x2oot mo= xxxx xoc2cc ~ococx 3hrd 3 tpDel : xxxxoc xooQC ~coocc xcoQOC xxxx xa~coc 9.1 xooQC xoococ xooQnc xoQOC xooocx 3hared L09: * * * * ~ * g ApproachDel: 0.0 1.1 7.8 0.0• Traffix System Veraioa 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng , Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:17:09 Page 10-1 Z'URTLE CREE K EXI3TIldG COPIDITIONS AM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report ' . 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Volume Alternativ+e) *,r*,r*~r*,~,r+r*,~*~r~**~r,r**sw*tttr*,t+e*tr*~,rw,r,t***~w**tx,r,r*~,t**,r*****,r~,t~*~r,r***,r,r:f*+t***,r „ . Intersection #55 3prague 6 Long • *~*trwrrt*****~*rr***~********,~*,r~**,t***,►*,r+t*tr******,►,tw,~*~r,t*******,t**~:~►w*****:,~*,t* . Average Delay (aec/veh) : 1.3 Worst Case Lerv+el Of 3ervice: A ' :*****rr~**,rw~r**w****,r*:**,►**,►*t*tw****~,r****,t~t,t,t*:*~~r****,t***~r*~,~,►,t;t***,t**f+r*+t,t Approach: North Hound south Bound East Bound West Bound ' Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R ' Control: 3top 3ign Stop 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontsolled Rights : Include Includ,e Includ,e Includ,e Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Volume Module: • Base Vol: 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 crowth Aaj: 1.00 i.oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Pa.eserHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Initial Bse: 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 Aclded Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volu50 0 24 0 0 0 0 65 44 5 70 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 50 0 24 0 0 0 0 65 44 5 70 0 - Adj us ted Volie Module : ' Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : xonoc xoaoc 11<2oos 31Qooc >0CKc aCKoc Nooot XXoc $ Truck/Comb: Xooc >oooc 31HOCoc >oocx >ooQC 20oos JNOaoc 2ooQc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PCE : 20aoc xxxx Xoot =ooc ,C= "oooz Xooc 21oocx Trck/Cmb PCE : XHoos 33Hoooc 2Cooc >oooc x3ooc XHooc ,Cocx .110= Adj Vol.: 55 0 27 0 0 0 0 65 44 6 70 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run Specd(E/W): 30 NPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 xoQOC 2.6 xcooot xxxx xcooct xoooc xxxx xoocx 2.1 xxxx xcococ • Cri tical Gp: 6.5 xooos 5.5 xooooc xoooc )ooooc xxx:)oc xoooc xooooc 5.0 xoooc xooooc ---------------11 11- --11 Capacity M,odule: Cnflict Vol: 162 xoooc 87 xxxx xxoos xoaoc xoooc xxxx xaocxoc 108 xoooc xooooc Potent Cap.: 853 xxxx 1252 x>ooc xoooc 2oooac xxxx xxxx xooQQC 1522 =oos =oocx Adj Cap: 1.00 xoooc 1.00 xoooc xoooc xaQOOC >ocxx xooc sooooc 1.00 xQnoc xmfloc Move Cap.:' 849 xocx 1252 xoQOC xxxx xoooot xoooc xxxx xooQac 1522 xxxx xooooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 . Level Of 3ervice Module: 3topped Del: 4.5 xoooc 2.9 xooooc xxxx xxooos xxoooc xooQC xooocc 2.4 xoQOC xoQOOC L03 by Mov+e : * * * - * * * * ~ * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT , shared Cap.: xcoos 948 xc~ooc xoooc xxxx xoxx xooac xxxx xxxooc xxoc xxxx 3ooooc 9hrd 3tpDel:;HoQOOC 4.1 Xooooc >ooocc >Cooc 3Koooc x3o0Cx 3X?ooc 210cQOC >00os ',Dcoc 30ooQc 9hared L03: * A ApproachDel: 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 ' Traffix 9ystem Versioa 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . . - Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:08 Page 1-1 T[JRTZE CREEK • EXISTING C0NIDITIONS PM PF.AK Turning Movement Report Voltune Northbound 3outhbound Eastbouad Westbound Total Type Lef t Thru Rig3it Lef t Thru Right I,ef t Thru Right I,ef t Thru Right Volume #2 Saltese b Sullivan - Hase 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Add,ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #6 8th b Hazker Base 1 32 5 24 57 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 144 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 32 5 24 57 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 144 #7 Sprague 6 Barker Base 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 429 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 429 #8 Appleway L Barker Base 24 104 21 8 144 171 136 301 21 19 324 7 1282 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 24 104 21 8 144 171 138 301 21 19 324 7 1282 - *10 WB Ramps 6 Barker Base 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 962 Add,eci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 962 #11 Misaion b Barker Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Add.ed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To tal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • #13 24th b•Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ 0 To ta1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ #14 16th s suliivan Baee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #15 4th 6 9ullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To tal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to =nland Pacific Eng ti • Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:08 Page 1-2 Z'LTRTLE CREEK EXISTIIJG CONDITION3 PM PF.AK Volie Northbound 3outhbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Lef t Thru Right I,ef t Thru Aight Lef t Thru Rig3it Lef t Thru Right Volie #16 3prague & Sullivan Base 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #22 3prague 6 A,ppleway Base 86 1 4 0 0 13 6 521 168 3 538 6 1346 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 86 1 4 0 0 13 6 521 168 3 538 6 1346 #25 TRENT & SAFtNER Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #30 HARKER/EB I-90 RAMPS Base 0 293 35 67 206 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 990 Addsd 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 990 #55 Sprague 6 Long ^ Base 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 8 82 0 261 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 8 82 0 261 Traffix Syetem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Lioenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . _1 Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Page 2-1 TURTIE CREEK EXI3TaTG CONIDITIONS PM PEAK Impact Analyais Report Level Of 3ervice Intersection Baae Etiture Change ' De1 / V/ Del / V/ in ' L03 Veh C L03 Veh C 6 6th 6 Barkes A 1.0 0.000 A 1.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 7 3prague b Barker A 2.6 0.300 A 2.6 0.300 + 0.000 V/C # 8 Appleway b Barker C 16.2 0.450 C 16.2 0.450 + 0.000 D/V # 10 WB R,axaps 6 Barker C 2.3 0.000 C 2.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 22 9prague b Appleway F 4.5 0.000 F 4.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 30 BAItKER/EB I-90 RAMP3 C 5.4 0.000 C 5.4 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 4 ~t 55 3prague ~ Long A 0.5 0.000 A 0.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C I ~ ~ r- Traffix 9yatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Ialand Pacific Eng r 'lt., 1+, , • Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Pag+e 3-1 TURTLE CREEK EXISTING CONIDITION3 PM P'EAK ,Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Base Voliae Altern.ative) ' *!t!**!~A*t*t*ff~*****t***!*******tt*~******~**~*ltttt****t***~ttt**#*~k*~~4**!!rt! Interaection #6 8th S Barker • ~*~,tf~**,r**f,~~*::~f**,tt#*~*,t,t,t,t*t~***,t*****te**tr*rr*tt~*tr**,►*~*t~►*,t*,r*r*,t,t*:,t*~t,r~~ Av+erage Delay (aec/veh) : 1.0 Worat Caae I,eviel Of 3ervice: A rr~,r:t***~r~►**~*w:**t*t*,►~r*+ttt*,r**,t,►*:**r*~,t*****,t~**,t*,trr,r*t+r,t~~►,►,r,~***:**~t~****** Approach: North Bound South Bovnd Eaat Bound Weat Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -----11 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop 3ign 3top Sign Rights : Include Includ,e Iaclude Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 11 Vol,,=we Module : Base Vol: 1 32 5 24 57 ' 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initisl Bae: 1 32 5 24 57 2 0,1 0 7 0 15 . Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . PHF Adj: 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 PHF Volume: 1 39 6 29 70 2 0 1 0 9 0 18 'Rreduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 39 6 29 70 2 0 1 0 9 0 18 - Adjusted Vol- Module: . Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 016 $ Gycle/Cars : XxQOC XxoQC XoXX Xocx XM:2m x0= XNoQC Xxaot $ Truck /Comb : Xooc Xooc Xxocx Xooc IooQC >oQCx 2ooos Xxooc PG'E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10. Cycl /Car PCE : Xocx >o= ~oQOC 2ooos 30ooc ".oooc xxxx Xooc Trck/Cmb PCE : 20ocx 2oocx 20ooc )ooQC >0ooc XXXoc x~ooc XcXc Adj Vol.: 1 39 6 32 70 2 0 1 0 9 0 20 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/8)•: 30 NPH « M,oveUp Time : 2.1 xoooc xocxQS 2.1 xxxx xooQQC >oocxx 3. 3xxoocx 3. 4xoooc 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 x)coc xooocx 5.0 xxxx xooooc xocxcs 6.0 xxxxx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 11 Capacity I•fodule: • Cnflict Vol: 72 xooc xoooQC 45 xoQOC xcoxoc xooc 147 xxocxs 144 xoflc 42 Potent Cap. : 1584 xoooc xcoQOC 1631 xoooc xooooc xcooc 914 xooooc 674 xoooc 1318 Adj Cap : 1.00 xooos xooocc 1.00 xoooc xooooc xoooc 0.98 xo~ox 0.98 xoQC 1.00 Mave Cap.: 1584 xooQC xooQOC 1631 x:)ooc xxococ xoooc 894 xoooos 858 xxxx 1318 ------------I --------=------11 Level Of Service Mdule: 9toppeci Del: 2.3 xococ xnccxt 2.2 xoooc xxooc xooooc 4.0 xoococ 4.2 xxxx 2.8 L03 by Mave: A ~ • A • • * A * * * Movement: I,T - LTR - RT I+T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 9harQd Cap. : xxxx xoooc =ooc xaQC xnQOC =oooc xoQCac xxxx =~os xoooc 1126 =OQc 3hrd 9 tpDel : xcaoc xoooc =ococ xccocx xocaQC xooooc x=oc xxxx -coooc xocooc 3.3 >cococ 9hared LOS : * * * * * • * * * p, * ApproachDel: 0.1 0.7 4.0 3.2 Traffix Syetem Veraioa 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ' , •~r. ~.i, : Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Page 4-1 'I'URTLE CREEK EXISTIIJG CaNIDITION5 . PM PEAK , Lev+el Of 3ervice Coaputation Report 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Volume Alternative) ~ w**,r,t**rr***Rwrt,t:,t~r*,t,►********,►,►,r***~*~*+►tr:*~,r*t~r,rw,~*:****,r******~e****~~►,►*,r*s*** Intersection N7 3prague 6 Barker - P ~****f****ww,r~,~***,t,t::~**~*,t**,t******~***tr***~***,t,t,t*fr**~►****~**,►*~*~t***~*,t~**** , Gycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : - 0.300 Loas Time (aec) : 6 Average Delay (aec/v+eh) : 2.6 Optimal Gycle: 0 I,evel Of 9ervice: A ' o •t,t:,►,~~,r***~t~r*rr,r,t*~r,t,t~rt*,r,~w*~,t~r,t,►r***~*~,t~***~~:~,t*,t,~,r*~:t**~~*,ttet,►****,►*,►fw*tr* ~ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Weat Bound ~ Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I Control: Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3iga Stop Sign Righta: ' •Include Include Includ,e Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I ---------------~j--------------- Vol~e M,odule: • ~ Base Vol: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 I Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ PaaserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Hse: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 ~ User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 + PHF A,dj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1 PHF Volume: 13 48 5 81 93 29 15 62 35 10 29 47 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Reduced Vol: 13 48 5 81 93 29 75 62 35 10 29 47 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLE'Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 13 '48 5 81 93 29 15 62 35 10 29 47 Saturation Flow Module: • Sat/Lane: 541 541 541 676 676 676 478 478 478 408 408 408 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.20 0.73 0.07 0.40 0.46 0.14 0.13 0.56 0.31 0.11 0.34 0.55 Final Sat.: 107 393 41 270 310 97 64 265 149 47 138 223 ------------I Capacity Analyais Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.21 Crit Mnv+es: w**,► w**~ w~*,► ------------I 11---------------~ Level Of service Module : • Delay/Veh: 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.1 3.1 3.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.2 L09 by Mav+e : A A A A A A A A A A 'A A w*w*:***,r,r~*w:*:w*t*,r*,ttr**,►~~t,t*,t,r*,r*****~,t*,r**~t~**w*,rww*~*,►w~***,r**~tr*~**~:**** Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eag P •.G•.7 . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Pag+e 5-1 TtJRTLE CREBK EXI3TII4G CaNIDITIONS - PM PF.AK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Operationa Method (Base Volum Alternative) **~*~******:~*w,~,►*f*,t,►*~**~~,rw~,►*~r*,t***,t,►t~e**~►*t*,rst*~***~f:**t~r:****~r**t:~**f* Interaection li8 Appleway 6 Barker - **tr*,r,tt*~~rr*,t,r,t,t*~rt+r,tttrf**#,t*t,►~**~*t,t,►*****+tt,t~*~+►*s****+t**,t*tt►*w*tw**~►~~t*wt**t , Gycle (aec) : , 90, . • Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : . 0.450 Loas Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 aec) Averag+e Delay (aec/veh) : 16.2 Optimal Gycle: 37 Ievel Of eervice: C *****,t***~**~~t~*s+t*~**:**rr***wft***,r**ftt****:**,t****t,tt:,t*~r*~t,►***~+t*,t,~ttf*t,t: Approach: North Bound 8outh Bound East Bovnd Weet Bound ~ Mrovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 l) ~ Control: Fermitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights : Inclwd,e Include Iaclud,e Include Min. Green : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 • ------------I Voltiaoe Mcdule : Base Vol: 24 104 21 8 144 171 138 301 21 19 324 7 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ PaseerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tnitial Bae: 24 104 21 8 144 171 138 301 21 19 324 7 v9?S Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Voli: 25 108 22 8 150 178 144 313 22 20 337 7 - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 25 lOB 22 8 150 178 144 313 22 20 337 7 PCE Adj:- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NLF Adj: . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 Final Vol.: 25 108 22 8 150 178 144 329 23 20 354 8 ---------------II I .Saturation Flow Module: Sat/I,ane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 I,anea: 0.16 0.70 0.14 0.02 0.45 0.53 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final 3at.: 221 955 195 37 697 827 1805 3516 246 1805 3716 84 ------------I Capacity ArAalysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.10 0.10 Crit Maves : Green/GZicle: 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.34 0.34 - Voltme/Cap: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.72.0.27 0.27 0.10 0.28 0.28 ------------I I,e.rel Of 9ervice Mcdule: Delay/Veh: 12.7 12.7 12.7 15.2 15.2 15.2 32.6 13.9 13.9 23.2 13.9 13.9 . Ueer DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 12.7 12.7 12.7 15.2 15.2 15.2 32.8 13:9 13.9 23.2 13.9 13.9 Qweue: 0 2 0 0 3 .4 4 6 0 0 6 0 *****~rt**r*+tw***,t,r~*:,t**~r~e****,~,~:*~*:,►i*~*~*~**~f~tt,►*t*~e*~*f~*t*,►~t*~~*w**w,rs*s Traffix 9ystea Veseion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng S. 'ti:,'•' Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Page 6-1 i TURTLE CREEK ~ EXISTIlIG CONDITIONS PM PEAK I,evel Of 3ervice Detailed Ccmputation Report 1•994 HGM Operations Method , Base Volie Alternative ,t***,t*w*,►**~rtw**,rtrtrx*r~*,r+r******,t,r,r##+~w#:w*,~*,r*~,r~,►*w~*****~r****s,►t►,►**t*w~:*t~rtf,► ' Intersection #8 Appleway b Barker *~►*~r~***,r,r*w,►****~r,r*****:*~~~r**~r*~~***,►~**~**~****~**~~*+rt~~**,r**tr***~*,►~~t*~r~,►t~r . I • Agproach: North Bound 3outh Houad East Hound West Bouad Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ' i--------------- i i-----=--------- i i--------------- i i--------------- i I HCM Ops Adjuated I,ane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ' Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR I, RT RT L RT' RT #LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ~ i ii ii--------------- ii-=-------------i I HCM Ops Input 3aturation Adj Module : Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12• 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Hev Veh: 0 0 0 . '0 ~ Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ Parking/Hr: No No No No - ~ Bus 3tp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Zype: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Exclusivp-RT: Include Inclucle Include Include ~ $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 11 - HCM Opa f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: ^ f(.tt) Case: 7 7 7 7 7 7 xocc 5 5 xxxx 5 5 f(lt) Case: 5 5 5 5 5 5 1xoooc xoooc 1xcoc xxxx ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops saturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grad,e A,dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00• 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoos 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 )oQC 1.00 1.00 xococ 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00*1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.83 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj : 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.95 xoocc xxxot 0.95 xoaQC xooQQc HCM 3at Adj: 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uar 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 bII.F 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ehl 3at Adj: 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 il--------------- 11 - Delay Adjustment Factor M,~dule: ~ • ' Coorciinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signallype: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 ~*!ti*~~!**ff!***~*t**!~~**!t~*~*!tt*******A*+R****!*~**~!**~***~****A***~*t~*t** • Traffix 3ystQ,zn Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ . . . c;, Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Page 6-2 TURTLE CREEK EXI3TBJG CdNIDITIdNS PM PF.AK Lev+el Of Service Detailed Coaputation Report (Permitted I,eFt Turn Sat Adj) . 1994 HCM Operations Method . Base Voll- Alternativie . ***********~**,t,►,t****~***~t*,t~***t~r*,►*****~,►,t,r*t**,t~**+~*,~:***,r**~*,t,ttt**,tt**rt~►+~~ Intersection #8 Appleway & Barker - ,t**~r,t,~*t,t**~**tt,ttr*~►*w*w*tr*,t,►rr~,tt~*~,r*:,tt**~~~t**~t*~*:**,►*tst*tf****s~~#*ieft*,t~e~t Approach: North 3outh Eaat West Gycle Leagth, C: 90 90 xoooQOS xooQOCx Actual Green Time Per I,ane Group, G: 34.20 34.20 xoooooc 310ooocx Effectiv+e Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 34.20 34.20 xxxxxx 3000cxx . Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 34.20 34.20 xxoooc •xoQOQc Number Of Opposing Lanea, No: 1 1 xxxxxx •xoosxxoc ~ Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xooc~ ~ooQOOc Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 25 8 xoootx ~ooootx Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.16 0.02 xocQOQC acx=ooc Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.02 0.16 xxoocQC 2000QOc . I,eft Turns Per Gycle, LTC: 0.63 0.20 xoooooc >00oooc , Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 336 155 xoocoQC %coQOOC • ' Oppoeing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 8.40 3.88 xxooooc =20oot Opposiag Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xxooooc XH3Cx3Cx . I,ost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xooooos 2=0ooc Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf : 14 . 04 21.02 xxooooc ~aoooQc ~ Ogposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.62 0.62 xooooc 3oooooc Eff grn blocked by oppoaing qweue, gq: 11.07 4.36 xcocoos >CX."Cocx Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 20.16 13.18 xoooooc 20noooc - Max oppoaing care arriving duriag gq-qf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx XX30= Proportion of Oppoeing Thru & RT cara, ptho: 0.98 0.84 xoooooc Xx3cxxQc Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: ~ooooM 30ooooc =oQOCC 3Cooocc Proportioa of Left Turne in shared Lane, pl: >ooooQC 2oo0coc ~ocoooc XXXXoQc Throuqh-car Ei valenta , ell : 3.76 1.94 xoooxoc 200xxooc 3ingle Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx J>Cooooc Minimum Left Turn Adjuatment Factor, fmin: 0.07 0.06 xocxooc "coCooc 3ingle Lane Left Zurn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.82 0.99 xooooQC MoQOOc Lef t Turn Adj us tment Factor, f 1 t: 0.82 0.99 xoooQOC 'MooQOOc *,t,r~~*,t*+t~*~rt~*:*************s~~tw,t+r~*~*~****~+t**,r,r****,t,t*ft*f**s**~,r:tt~*,t~*~*~r+r Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng t'- ~ . • ~'y.<< Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Pag+e 7-1 TtJRTLE CREEK EXI3TING COrIDITI021S PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volie Alternativ+e) rr*~,►**~*~***rr**~******~e***,t**~r*~r,►~r,r,rw****~r~~r*~:x**w***:#**:**~,r,►:*****w,r**:,r:~*,r Interaection #10 WB Ramps 6 Sarker ' ~ . *l~tt:*!*+l1r*tr*,tlt****:f~****~►~t*t****!rt*,t*~!*t*t,t***ir*~~***~tt**tr*~Ir*t1rlt*****t*ttr**!1r _ AveragL Delay (sec/veh) : 2.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C **,rt:rr*~*~**f*w****,►,►~***w**wwr►,►,~,►****r********,~*rr*t***f~t:*~:,r*t*w:*w:*f*t~*,t*: Approach: North Bound 3outh Bouad East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~II II 11 I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop 3ign 3top 3ign ~ Righta : Include Include Include Includ,e Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume M,odule : ' Hase Vol: 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ` Znitial Bae: 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 , User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Vol-,-: 101 379 21 13 283 128 46 10 8 29 34 25 • Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 101 379 21 13 283 128 46 10~ 8 29 34 25 , ------------I 11 ---------------II I Adjus ted Vollure Modul'e : • Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 08 $ Gycle/Cars : xooc xoooc XXooc xxosx 3oooc .10= 3oocc 2oooc $ Truck /Camb : >ooot 20oQC xxoot I 10= 110ocx 20oot 2Cooc Xo= PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : Xooc Xocc aoocx 2ooot Xooot Xxosx 20oQC .10= Trck/Cbb PCE : 2onoc ~oocx aooQC 2oocx Xxooc 30otx Adj Vol.: 111 379 21 15 283 128 50 11 9 32 37 27 , II I Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3pecd(N/3): 30 MPH « MoveVp Time : 2.1 xxxx -cKxooc 2.1 xQOOS mooQC 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xoccc xocoos 5.0 xooos xoQOOC 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 11 Capacity Module: ' Cnflict Vol: 410 xxxx xooooc 400 xxxx xoooot 880 861 347 860 914 390 Potent Cap.: 1093 xoooc xoQOOC 1105 xxxx xxooot 328 385 924 337 361 879 Adj C ap : 1. 0 0xotxc xxxooc 1. 0 0xoooc xooooc 0.78 0.85 1.00 0.86 0.85 1.00 Move Cap.: 1093 xoooc xooooc 1105 xooot xoooot 256 328 924 288 308 879 . ------------I II II I Level Of 3ezv3.ce Module: 3topped Del: 3.6 xoooc xoQOOC 3.3 xxxx xxoaot 17.1 11.3 3.9 13.9 13.1 4.2 IA9 by Move : A * * p, * * * * * * * * Moveoent : I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I.T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xxxx xa~ct xooccc xooQC xoooc xoQOOC xooQC 292 xxooos xxxx 367 xoococ 9hrd 3 tpDel : xxxooc xoooc xxoQOC xxxQOC xoQOC xoooQC xxQCioc 15.7 xooooc xxcooc 12.9 xocQOc 9hared LOS: + * + * * * * C * * C * ApproachDel: 0.8 0.1 14.6 10.9 . Traffix 8ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceased to Inland Pacific Eng ~ - , bug DT970Ea PUVTuI 0-4 POsUaDt'I KQ 966T (0) 6'9 IIoigsaA Ma4sAS xi33e=Z . 010 0' 0 8'£ L' 6 5 ~ tOCRD8O2dclf +r a s a ~ ~ s H : SO'Z PaxeqB xiaaot soocc xoooc xiooor 3oooc xaaoac 33oooc saaac xsocsoc Z. L x3coc 3oocac: Taad4S PziS sacc, xaoc soooc 3aaaac 3oaQr soaac Xooor 3c0oc xaor pOS xxxc 3aaac deO PexetiB sx - sz sx - titz - sz sx - x~z - sz sx -)Ltz - sz :14uammAOH ' . ~ s ~ . v v 3 : aACW Aq s(yz xxx= X3,= S• 5 XXX)a xi3oc 33= Xxxa T' b S' 6 T 8' Z9 :TaQ PeddQ4S : aTnpaK 60T,'LXag 30 taAa'I I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II I ' XXXa XXXX T99 ~X XXXX 808 TL6 xxxt xxxt £88 98T ZST : ' dE~ aAaK ~xxx 100= 00"T Xxx)0t Xx)0C 00'T 00'T xx= =c3t 00'T L6'0 96'0 : dEo ~pY x3cxxx xixx T9!~ XXXXX XXXX 808 TL6 XXXX XXXX £88 06T LST ='dp~ quaqod xi~x Xxxx TLL Xxxx3t XXXX 609 b06 X3= XXXX S8E 96ZT 96ZT :'LoA IOtT3=3 :aTnpOK A4iovdEo II=-------------- II I I-II 3oXcsor 3ooac S• S xoaoor - 3oocsr g' S S' S X3= XX3= 5' S S' 9 0' L :dD TQa iquo X30a xxxx T • Z XXXa XX30C T ' Z 9,z XXXX xxxxx 9 ' Z £ ' £ q ' £ = 9M?s dL1amox » Hclx OE ~(M/Z) PeadS tm'g 00000£ : LIOT'VETLtdOd «:amPoR dE9 TEatqu3 I-=-------------II--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- I L Z09 b 88t £85 L 9T 0 0 S T 90T :'TOA ~pV 3a3oc 30= 3aax Soo= socxx 30cxx xoar Saaoc qm0/Aoas 3000c 30oac 3ooac xxxx 3oooc 3030c 3ao0c 3o30r -Teo/T013 00'T 00'T OT'T 00't 00't OT'T OT'T OT'T Ot'T OT'T OT'T OZ'T :~PK 3od xxxx 30oor 30ooc Xxoac • xxxc xnoc X3cx 3ooor :qazo0/3pnzy $ Xxaot 3aoac xicxx 3aoot Xotx xxaoc sooar xsaoc : c=e0/ajo1D $ $0 $0 • $0 $0 :aPEi9 : aTnPOR OUMTOA P949n[PY - I---------------II---------- -----11--------------- 11--------------- I G Z09 E 88T £85 L 5T 0 0 b T 96 :'toA TeUt3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :TOA 4anpali L Z09 £ 88T £85 L 5T 0 0 b T 96 =8=10A 3Hd 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 68'0 =;PY 3Hd 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'T 00'T 00't 00'T 00'T •00'T 00'T :IPY =agA 9 8£5 £ 89T TZS 9 6T 0 Q D T 98 =69H TIeT4?UI i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = ZoA1Cgxasevg 00'T 00'T 00'T 00't 00'T 00'Z 00'T 00'T 00't 00'T 00'T 00'T :CP'K q4mOZo ' 9 8£S E 89T TZS 9 £T 0 0 b T 98 :Top asEg : aTnPWR aumtoA i I--------------- II II--------------- I I 0 T 0 T 0 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 T : gau-eZ aPTiTauI a'P'nToul a'P'ntOuI BMTOuI : g4,q6?ZI Patjorluoaun P0TT0r4u00un Ubig do4g c=btg do-4g :T0s4u0D II ---------------II---------------II---------------I------------ I 2i - s - Z u - Z - z ?I - s - z 2I - s - z :4uamaAoK . PunoH 4 BaM PunoB :;ggg PanoS cnno8 P'unoS ~1=otd ~+~+~►aas~s~~~+~~~~sfasf~saa+~~c+~+~s~~►af+r~+~f~rsas~s;+►s+~a~~aa+~~~►a~~~~~sa~►aa~a~c~a~~~a+r~c~ 3 :aauzag 30 TQAB'I aee:) '49.zoM S'b :(qan/oae) 1tQtaQ abezanv ~~assas~f+~+r~a~►ss~►~~s~►~a•s~a~a;+►sss~+~f~ca~~c+~~c~s~+rsss~s~~r+~a+~~ra~~+~~~t~+~~►s~c+~~~+►+~~ca~a~ _ . AsAatd,dY q anbEZdg ZZ# uor4oasiaqul s~ss~as~►~ss~s~+~~c~c~►+►~~►~~~►~~i~sss~s~ca~~s~►f~f~+~~+~+~asaa~~►sf~~cssass~aaass~ssaas+rsssaaa (ant4euxaqTV aaatToA aseg) poinayz paz-rTeub'reun MH 1,66T qzodam uot4EqndaoC) aatnsag 30 ZaAO'I ?Itlzd Wd SNOISI@I4D JNIISSIX3 x3Z2io =IifU T-8 "Ed 60=65=60 566T '8T bnY zi,3 Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Pag+e 9-1 TURTLE CRF:EK EXI3T32iG CONIDITICINS PM PEAK Leve1 Of Service Caaputation Repcrt 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volime Alternative) **~*,t~t*~**,~trr*,t*~e**tr+t**~t*,~,t**,t**wt*~e**~***trr~:**rr,~*****s*,t**,t****f*,t**w,t*t***~r~* . Intersection 4l30 BARIQZR/EB I-90 RP,lrP3 . :,~:*~*,r**w:*,rt~,►,►*~tt**,►*,►~rw*~**~**,t*****~►t**~rf**t:~**t~,r,t*~r~*~***trw~e***~r,r*tr*,t,r*~ ' Average Delay (aec/veh) : 5.4 " Worat Case Ieve1 Of 3ervice: C ~wt~*,r***~**+►,►,t:*,r~**+tr**+t,t,►,t,rw,rrt,r***~~**t,r*w,r,t*wwwt*~*,r*~~w,►~w**:*,r~*,t:~t**~r~~►*• ' Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound Eaat Bouad Weat Boun.d Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R ' Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled stop sign 3top Bign Rights: Includs Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volt~e Madule: ' Base Vol: 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Tnitial Bse: 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 308 37 70 219 0 240 1 166 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 308 37 70 219 0 240 1 166 0 0 0 ------------I Adjuated Volume Module: Grad,e: 0$ 0$ ' 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cara : 2o3QC .10= • xxXoc Xocx XcXoc Xocx xx= 310= $ Truck /Comb : XocX xaoQC Xooc , XxoQC 'oooc XcXc 30ooc Noooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl /car PCE : =ocx XcXoc ~oooc =ooc 20ooc Xoot Xooc >oooc Trck/Cnb PCE : x~KXot >0= Xooc xxxx 3oooc Xxcxx Xooc >oooc A,dj Vol.: 0 308 37 77 219 0 263 1 183 0 0 0 ------------I Critical Gap Modnle: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 MPH « MoveUP Time : xaxQC xoooc xoot= 2.1 xocQC xocoot 3 .4 3.3 2.6 >cncot xoooc >oQOOc Critical Gp:xooooc MoQC >ooooc 5.0 xoooc xxxxs 6.5 6.0 5.5 >ooooc 30ooc >coocc ------------I 11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xoocs xooooc 345 xxxx xxQOCx 615 633 219 x)pcc xccoc xxoooc Potent Cap.: xooQC xooQC xoooot 1175 xooos xoQOtx 466 507 1073 xxxx xxxx xooooc Adj Cap : xxxx aoooc xooooc 1.00 xooc xoooc 0.92 0.92 1.00 >oQas xxxx ~aoooc Mcve Cap.: xooc xxxx xooooc 1175 xxxx xoooct 431 469 1073 xoooc 3oocc 30oaos ------------I , I.evel Of 9ervice Module : Stopped Del:meoot xoQOC meooc 3.3 xoot xxotxc 18.7 7.7 4.0 x=oc xoooc 2ooQOt IA9 by Move: * * * . A A * * * M+ovement: I,T - LTR - RT I,T LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT 3hared Cap.: mooc m= xoocxx )ooQC XXXX 2e3= 431 xoooc xxxx xxxx =anc Shrd 3 tgDel : xooooc xoooc xooaoc xxooc xoaoc xxxxct 18.8 xxxx xooQCC xoo= xoocx 2'ocxeoc 9hared L03: C ,r * w * tr ApproachDel: 0.0 0.9 12.6 0.0 • Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inlaad Pacific 8ng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:59:09 Page 10-1 TURTLE GREEK EXISTII4G CCNIDITIOiNS PM P&AK I,QV+el Of Service Ccmputation Report 1994 HGM Unsignalized Method (Base Voluaae Alternative) l~+kA*f~t**R***R*!t*!*tt**4tf*~*tt*!*f!**!****ff 1f***t!#**ft***f****t***!~!f****tt . . Interaection 1i55 3prague b I,ong *,►w*fr~t~rww*fstwi~r+tw:***,►*iw,rr,ri*,►t*~~fr***rwsw*ws**+►~**,t***~**,►t:t►s~~R,t*:**,rw~r Average Delay (aQC/veh): 0.5 Worat Caee Lev+el Of Service: A •,►*,►,►ttr,►~*,►r**,t**tt*~►*tit,►*s,~**~awt*~►ww*ts~*~t**tw:**~t~it~,rf**r*,►,r~s*r~****tt*• Approach: North Bound South Bound Eaet Bourid Weat Bound Maveme.nt : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~ Control: 9top 9ign Stap 9iga Uncoatrolled LJncontrolled Righta: Include Inclvde Include Inclu,de I.aneB : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ~ i--------------- i i--------------- i i--------------- i i--------------- i vol,- roaule: Base Vol: 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 8 82 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . PaaaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 8 82 0 Uaez Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Vol-,-: 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 148 18 9 92 0 Recluct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina1 Vol.: 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 148 18 9 92 0 • ~ 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Adj ue ted Voll- Module : Gracle : 0$ 08 0$ 0$ % Gycle/cara : 3oooc 20oos x)noc >ooQC Xxccx Xooc .1-oaac xiocc $ Truck /Caub : Xooc Ncooc xKXot Xoot XxOOt "oooc >oooc 20oc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00, 1.10 1.00 1.00 . Gycl /Caz PGE : =coc xooc 3ooQt 3oooc ~oooc 3oooc .143onc Xxoos Trck /Cnb PCE : xxxx x3oc x=oc xioot XXcoc Ioc=c 20ooc 3nooc Adj Vol.: 25 0 4 0 0 0 0 148 18 10 92 0 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 9pQed(E/'W): 30 MPH « MavoUp Time : 3.4 xicoc 2. 6 2ooooc xooc mnooc )ocKxoc =ooc moaQC 2 .1 =ooc mcoas Critical Gp: 6.5 xxxx 5.5 xoooQC xoooc mosx mcooc xxxx =ooc 5.0 xoooc xoooc Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 257 xoooc 156 xoooc xoooc moooc xoooc xoooc xomoc -165 xoooc xcxoxs Potent Cap.: 752 xxxx 1154 xxxx xoaoc xioooc xQOOt xoocc xxsaoc 1430 xoooc xioooc Adj Cap: 0.99 xocQC 1.00 xoccc xcoc xocooc xxxx xiooc xcconc 1.00 xoooc xocooc Mave Cap.: 746 xcooc 1154 xonQC xxxx xocQOC xxxx xoooc xoocos 1430 xaaQC xoccoc ' ------------I 7evel Of 9esvice Mcdule : etappQd Dnl : 5.0 xccoc 3 .1 xcocos xxxx moocc xooc= xooac xxx= 2.5 xoooc mooncx IAS by IrbvQ : • • r • ♦ rt * : t A • tr Mavomnnt : I,T - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT I+T - LTR - RT LT - I.TR - RT 9harad Cap. : xoocc 782 xcmcc xooac xxxx xcococ xoooc xoocc xxooos xconc xococ xoocxc 9hrd 3 tpDol : xoooct 4.8 xoocflc xoa~oc xxxx xotxoc xxcaoc xoooc xicooc xctxc xonQC xoaooc 8haz^ad IA3: * l► * ~ * * t • * ♦ * * ApproachDel: 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 Traffix 9yatem VQraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eag _ . , , - PROJECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR PRUPOSED ACTION WITH APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS ONLY ~ ~ ~ f 1 , ; I . ; " . I • Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:06:27 Page 1-1 TURTLE CREEK ~ APPROVED PLAT3 ANID Z'URTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Trip Generation Report ~ AM PEAK HOUR Foreca9t for Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Total $ Of # 3ubzone Auwunt Units In Out In Out Trips Tota1 ~ 4 PTVPIUVLLK 120.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 23 66 89 46.8 Zone Q 3ubtotal 23 66 89 46.8 , 5 TURTLE CREEK 101.00 3EDU 0.19 0.55 19 56 75 39.5 ~ Zone 5 3ubtotal 19 56 75 39.5 ~ 6 MEADCIWVIEW R 35.00 3FDU 0.19 0.55 7 19 26 13.7 Zone 6 Subtotal 7 19 26 13.7 , ' TOTAL 49 141 190 100.0 • Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ' 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:27 Page 2-1 , . TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AND TURTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR ~ Tzip Distribution Report _ Percent Of Trips To Gates 3 8 9 11 12 Zone v . 4 10.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40.0 5 40.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 45.0 6 10.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inla.ad Pacific Eng 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:27 Pag+e 3-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AND T[JRTLE CREEK AM PF.AK HOUR Turning Movement Report Volt~e Northbound 3outhbound Eastbound Westbound Tota1 ' Type I,ef t Thru Riqht Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Vol"Mke #2 3altese b Sullivan Base 0 286 25 35 82 0 0 0 0 60 0 167 655 • - Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 286 25 35 82 0 0 0 0 60 0 167 655 #6 8 th b Barker ' Base 2 39 2 13 27 0 3 0 4 5 0 18 113 , Added 0 0 0 7 0 12 53 0 0 0 0 19 91 Total 2 39 2 20 27 12 56 0 4 5 0 37 205 - #!7 3prague ~ Barker , ..y Base 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 409 Added 0 72 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 •Total 24 170 6 11 60 10 13 25 12 B 49 111 500 48 Appleway 6 Barker Base 45 173 23 5 50 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 858 Addred 21 44 7 7 15 7 2 0 2 2 0 2 109 Total 67 217 29 12 66 113 58 215 13 25 147 5 967 #10 WB Raaspa 6 Barker ' Base 179 149 59 20 143 186 8 16 6 23 25 8 823 -Added 34 18 0 0 21 26 2 0 2 0 0 0 103 Total 213 167 59 20 164 213 11 16 9 23 25 B 926 #11 Mission 6 Barker Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 4 16 7 1 0 0 0 0 46 0 20 94 Total 0 4 16 7 1 0 0 0 0 46 0 20 94 #13 24th b Sullivan Base 6 341 6 15 94 19 93 16 0 8 119 122 839 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 6 341 6 15 94 19 93 16 0 8 119 122 839 #14 16th b suliivan Base 30 819 3 17 233 68 180 8 11 1 10 72 1452 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 30 B19 3 17 233 68 180 8 11 1 10 72 1452 #15 4th & Sullivan ' Base 29 1088 30 36 327 22 24 11 3 24 8 58 1660 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 29 1088 30 36 327 22 24 11 3 24 8 56 1660 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licea.sed to Inland Pacific Eng Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:06:27 Page 3-2 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AND Z'URTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Vo1L=-A- Northbound 3outhbound Eastbound Westbound Tota1 • Type Lef t Thru Aight Lef t Thru Right I,ef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Ri.ght Volimtie ' #16 3prague 6 8ullivan Base 129 761 156 114 307 151 194 241 58 100 311 147 2688 - Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 11 0 0 31 0 42 Total 129 781 156 114 307 151 194 251 58 100 342 147 2730 . ' #22 sprague 6 Appleway Base 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 324 73 1 386 6 925 Add,ed 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 28 0 42 Tota1 117 1 3 2 1 7 5 328 80 1 414 6 966 #25 TRENT & BARKER Base 59 0 30 0 0 0 0 199 57 64 872 0 1280 Add,ed 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 32 Total 82 0 30 0 0 0 0 199 65 64 872 0 1312 #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAbdP3 Base 0 355 9 47 103 0 83 1 24 0 0 0 623 Added 0 42 7 7 17 0 9 0 12 0 0 0 93 Total 0 397 16 54 120 0 93 1 35 0 0 0 716 #55 3prague & Long ~ Base 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 243 Add,ed 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 Total 50 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 48 5 66 0 253 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . . . . 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:28 Page 4-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AAID TURTZE CREEK AM PEAc xovx I.apact Analysis Report Level Of 3ervice Intersection Base Future Chaage Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in I,OS Veh C LOS Veh C f~ 6 8th & Barker ' A 1.2 0.000 A 2.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C • # 7 Sprague 6 Barker A 2.8 0.356 A 3.4 0.421 + 0.065 V/C # 8 Appleway 6 Bazker B 14.9 0.360 B 14.1 0.468 -0.784 D/V # 10 WB Ramps & Barker C 2.1 0.000 C 2.4 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 22 3prague b Appleway D 3.5 0.000 D 4.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 30 BAFtKER/EB I-90 RJ1MP8 B 1.8 0.000 C 2.0 0.•000 + 0.000 V/C # 55 3prague b I,ong . A 1.3 0.000 A 1.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific $ng . . . v • r , Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:06:28 Page 5-1 T[TRTI,E CREEK APPROVED PLATS ANID TUFtTLE CREEK AM PF.AFC FiOUR Lev+el Of 3ervice Conputation Report • 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Fliture Volume Alternative) ♦***+►~******~**,rt****~*,►**,t~~~*~****~e*,►*s**:,r*:s~~►*~*~*t**,r,r***!,►,r,r,r***,►t****:** ; Interaection *6 8th 6 Barker t**tr,t~**~►,~*,~***~**,►*,r*,►t*****s***~*,t*~**~~►~**w,trr**~*~**~r*,r***:stt*,t**~~r,rft**,►,t** ' - Av+erage Delay (sea/v+eh) : 2.3 Worat Caae Lev+al Of 8enrice: A rrr►*******~***,t*,r**~**,r~**w*~►*******,~**+t~r*****,►~r*~*~*trt*****f***,tt*~wtr**~t:*,ttr,r*,r Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bovnd West Bound ' Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R --I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 I i Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 9top Siqn Stop 9ign , Righte: Include Include Include Include I,anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 . ------------I Volume Mrodule : ~ - Base Vol: 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 ' Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.,03 1.03 1.03 1.03 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Initial Bae: 2 39 2 13 27 0 3 0 4 5 0 18 Added Vol: 0 0 0 7 0 12 53 0 0 0 0 19 Initial Eut: 2 39 2 20 27 12 56 0 4 5 0 37 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ PHF Adj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 PHF Volt-: 3 48 3 25 33 15 69 0 5 6 0 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 3 48 3 25 33 15 69 0 5 6 0 45 - Adjuated Volie Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ Gyicle/Caxs : xoooc xxxx Joooc 20oQt .10oot x= .1oooc 30oQc $ TrucJc /Comb : 2oooc 20ot -1ooot >oooc XXQOt 30ooc 3cxxoc 2otXc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : xxxx xxxx 2oooc .10oQC 210= NoQOC Xxocx 310ooc Trck/Cab PCE : 20oos 30otx xxXc ~cooc 2oooc 2ooQC 2ooac 20ooc Adj Vol.: 3 48 3 28 33 15 76 0 6 7 0 50 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 2.1 xoooc xooooc 2.1 xxxx xooooc 3. 4xoooc 2.6 3. 4xxooc 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xcooc xxcoc 6.5 xxxx 5.5 6.5 xxxx 5.5 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 48 xoooc xooooc 51 xoooc xooooc 141 xxooc 41 121 xooc 50 Potent Cap.: 1626 xooac xooooc 1621 xooot xooooc 878 xoooc 1320 901 xooz 1307 Adj Cap: 1.00 xooos xooooc 1.00 Xoooc xoocxoc 0.95 xoooc 1.00 0.98 xoac 1.00 M,ave Cap.: 1626 xxxx xoQOOC 1621 xnQOC xoQOOC 832 xxxx 1320 884 xoooc 1307 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Level Of 3ervice Mcdule : 3topped Del: 2.2 xxxx xxxotx 2.3 xoooc xoo= 4.7 xooos 2.7 4.1 x)= 2.9 L09 by Mov+e : A * * p, * * * * * * * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - I,TR - RT LT - I+TR - RT Shared Cap. : xoccs xoooc ~ooooc xoooc xxxx ~oot xxxx 853 xoQOOC 2oooc 1234 xcQOOc 3hrd 3 tpDel : xoooc xooc ~oooQC ~ooooc xoooc x~oooc 2ooec 4.6 ~oooc xooaKx 3 . 0 moooc 3hared L03: * * * * ♦ * * p, • ~ A * ApproachDel: 0.1 0.8 4.6 3.0 - Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ ' . 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:28 Page 6-1 TURTLE CREEK ' APPROVED PLATS AIID TURTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Level Of Service CaaqDutation Report - 1994 HGM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) - **t*rrt►+t,r***t**#~r~r:t:***~*~***tt,tw***tr*,t******tr**ts:*t*,►*:*,~**ttttrrr****,t*t,tw,r~*,r,r Interaection #7 3prague 6 Bazker ****,r****+►*~r:,►,►,►~**,r*,r****,r*****~***s*,►**~~*,r,►,►*~*******t,►***::*:~*t*~r,r,►**t**:*~ Gycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.421 Loae Time (sec) : 6 Average Delay (sec/v+eh) : 3.4 Opti.mal Gyicle : 0 Level Of 3ervice : A tttt,ttr*~,r***~,t****,t*,t~*:*~,t**,t,t**,t~*~r***:f**:*~~rtt,►,t*,►tr***t►*,t*****~r*****,t**~t,r,r,r,r Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound WeBt Bound , Mov+ement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 9ign Rights: Include Inclu.d,e Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volwae Module : . Base Vol: 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 24 12 8 48 108 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 6 49 111 Added Vol: 0 72 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 170 6 11 60 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 - PHF vol-tmbe: 27 193 7 13 68 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 193 7 13 66 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •Final Vol.: 27 193 7 13 68 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 11 Saturation Flow M,odule: Sat/Lane: 738 738 738 654 654 654 533 533 533 456 456 456 A,djustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.. 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanea: 0.12 0.85 0.03 0.14 0.73 0.13 0.26 0.49 0.25 0.05 0.29 0.66 Fina1 9at.: 88 627 23 91 478 84 140 262 131 21 133 302 ------------I - Capacity Analysis Mcdule: ' Vol/3at: 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.42 0.42 0_42 Crit Mpv+es • w*** ------------I 7eve1 Of 3ervice Module: Delay/Veh: 3.2 3.2 3.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 3.2 3.2 3.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 IA3 by Move : A A A A A A A A A A A A **,t*~►,r,twt,r~*tts,t*,►#**,tt**trtrt~►+►*+►~+r~,t,t~twtttti,r,►~rr***,rfw,►*i~**,r*w**+r**:ftt~w*tr*** Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to,Inland Pacific Eng \ 8at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:29 Page 7-1 TIJFtTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AAID TURTZE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Level Of 3ervice Coaputation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Plature Volume Alternative) ,►w,rww,r,r**a+►,t*,tw*,t~e,t~~t~~**~**,t~**rr,t**,t*~*::*t**:*t**,t~:,t,tfttt~~r,t:*tft****,t***~** Interaection #8 Appleway 6 Barker **~******,t*****,►~►*~r****t*w***tttr,t*:,r+~***~f*****t**~**tr,t*****t~►**::,t*,t*ttr*w**:w* Gycle (aec) : 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X): 0.468 Loas Time (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Av+erage Delay (sec/veh) : 14.1 Optimal Cycle : 38 Level Of 9ervice : - B . w,t*,►w*~*,r**~r*,t***~*tr*t~r*:*t***:s**:ttr,r~,►*,rrt,t*,►~t~**~***t*******~e,r,r:,t,t,ttr**t~,►*,rtr,►tr ApProach: North Bound South Bound $ast Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R Z - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R - ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Riqhts: Includ,e ' Includ.e Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ' ------------I 11 Vol- M,odule: • Base Vol: 44 166 22 5 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 45 173 23 5 50 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 Ad,ded Vol: 21 44 7 7 15 7 2 0 2 2 0 2 Initial Put: 67 217 29 12 66 113 58 215 13 25 147 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 ~ PHF Volie: 86 279 38 15 85 145 74 277 17 32 189 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 86 279 38 15 85 145 74 277 17 32 189 7 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IrLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 Final Vol.: 86 279 38 '15 85 145 74 291 18 32 199 7 ~II II II Saturation Flow Module: 9at/Laae: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.21 0.70 0.09 0.06 0.35 0.59 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 281 913 124 88 497 848 1805 3543 219 1805 3671 129 ------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/3at: 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.08 0.08 0:02 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: Green/Gycle: 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.45 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.45 0.45 ------------I if Level Of 3ervice Mcdule: Delay/Veh: 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 26.3 21.9 21.9 31.0 24.2 24.2 Uaer DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , AdjDel/Veh: 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 26.3 21.9 21.9 31.0 24.2 24.2 Queue : 1 4 1 0 1 2 2 7 0 1 5 0 :#*~******,►*t,►::*t+►:**~►**,t***:*tf*,►~t*t,~~*****~**~tr,r*~,t**~w*,►~~*****~~:*w,t*~,t~t:*♦ Traffix 9yatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inlaad Pacific Eng . - Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:06:29 Paqe 8-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AND TURTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Level Of Service Detailed Caaputation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method Future Volie Alternative r*t**:t**~**ft*rrrr*~*t***t***,t**~r,t**~***+~:*w,tt***:**:**tr~r,t*#,rx**,►**t~w**#**,►**,t* • Intersection 1l8 Appleway b Barker *,r**~r*~*~*~r~**w***f+r*:~,►,~*,r*****~►::*~***t,►*~►**tr,r*#+t,r:~r***~*,►~rw,►,r***+~,►*+t,►,r****s,►* Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound East Bound West Bound .M,ovement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R . ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 11---------------) HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization M,odule: Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group : I,TR I,TR LTR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT I. RT RT #LnsIzsGrpa : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops Input 3aturation Adj Module: I,ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 ~ Hev Veh: 0 0 ' 0 0 Grade: 0$ 0$ 0% 0% Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus 3tp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area TyPe : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 1I--------------- - JiCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Caee M,odule: . f(rt) Case: 7 7 7 7 7 7 xoooc 5 5 xxot 5 5 f(lt) Case: 5 5 5 5 5 5 1xooQC x)ooc 1xxooc xosxos ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops 3aturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Gracie Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ Parking Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxoot 1.00 1.00 xxxc 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoooc 1.00 1.00 xoooc 1.00 1.00 - Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.82 0.82 0.82 xoQOC 0.99 0.99 xooQC 1.00 1.00 LT Adj : 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 xxQS xxooc 0.95 xoooc xooo~s HCM Sat Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 var Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2rMF Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 Fn1 Sat Adj: 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: _ Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > siqnal Zype: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuatecl > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 w*trr**t:***~r,ttrt,►***str****,t*t******~~*****~**w**:tt***t***te*,t*****r*n*********w~,► Traffix Syatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Enq Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:06:29 Page 8-2 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AAID TiTRTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Level Of Service Detailed Coaputation Report (Permitted Left Turn 9at Adj) . 1994 HCM Operations Method Eutvre vollune Alternative ~ ***~,t***~*,t+►~►~►t,tr,r*~*tr,r~t~,t*t~*,r**~~r,r,t,t*,ttr**w*~e~~c**:~rr*,t,t*******~*,r*w**,►***~:ts,r* Interaection #8 Appleway 6 Barker . *r►,r***,►,t*♦~*+rf~#****~r~***~*~~►**~*,t***~*w**t,►wr~****t*:~ttt*tr,t***trws*~~****,►**s~,t Approach: North South Ea9t West Cycle Length, C: 90 90 xxoococ IoaosXc 'Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 58.73 58.73 xxoooQC x3o3QOc E f f ec tive Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 58.73 58 . 73 3aoocxc ~oooQOt Opposing Effective Green Tim,e, go: 58.73 58.13 xooooc xoooocx • Nlmiber Of Oppoaing Lanes, No : 1 1 xoooooc 3oooooc Ntmiber Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xooooot aonocxx Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 86 15 xooooot .10oQOOc Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.21 0.06 x=otx Xooooc Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.06 0.21 xoooaoc XK2oKXt Lef t Turns Per Cycle, LTC : 2.15 0.38 xoooxQC 2oQOOCx Adjusted Oppoaing Flow Rate, Vo: 245 403 xoooooc Xx3o30c Opposing Flow Per I,ane Per Gycle, Volc: 6.13 10.07 xxoxooc )C)CXD= Oppoaing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xxooooc xaocooc Loat Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xoaoooc ~oooooc Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf : 10 . 60 32 . 93 xcoQCx 310CHQOOt Oppo a ing Qt:eue Ra*_i o, qro : 0.35 0.35 xxxoQC XXXooc Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 2.41 5.36 xaQO~ ~os30cxx E f f grn whi le lef t turns f il ter thru, gu : 48.13 25 . 81 xxoctx Xooooc Max oppoaing cazs arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xoooooc >000occ Proportion of Opposing T'hru 6 RT cara, ptho: 0.94 0.79 xocococ 31oooooc Left-turn 3aturation Factor, fa: X=oooc XoooQC Mooooc 'CoQOOc Proportion of Left Tums in 3hared Lane, pl: .1<20oooc Xooooc XoooQOt >ontxxx Through-cas Eiu;valents, ell: 2.72 4.60 xooooQt .1oo3ooc 3ingle Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xxooos Xoooooc Mini*n+=*++ Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 0.04 0.04 xooooos IMooootx 3ingle I,ane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.78 0.92 xxxooc -ooQOOc Left Turn Adjuatment Factor, flt: 0.78 _ 0.92 xoooooc XooXXoc *~*~~►~~*****,r*:~r~*t*,tt*tr~,t,►~**,t*,►*,~*~*********~,t**r~**f**********:tr~rt*,r,trrnr***rr* Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . , 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:29 Page 9-1 TiJRTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AAID TiJRTLE CREEK AM PF.AK HOUR Leve1 Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM Uneignalized Method (Eliture Voliane Alternativ+e) ~****r►*+t,c***~:,t,►~r*te~**,►*t~,►trt*,t,t*****,►,r~trt,~*,r***w*,r*~*t***:,►~t,►*~rtt*~,tr*,r,►,r~r**,r* Interaection #10 WB Ramp8 6 Barker rr*********~►*:,~w**r,►*,t*w~:,►*~r,►,r,r*,r***t*t,r*i,t***t**,rrr**w~,t*,r*+t~********,rrrw,t*~r#**** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.4 Worat Caae I,evel Of 3ervice: C ~*****,r**,r,r*,►*s**,►*,r~,r*,►t***~~*:~******~r~,~w~,r,t,r,t**~*,r**~t*t*w**,r**,►,r*st:*:*w*t*t Approach: North Bound 3outh Boun,d East Bound West Bound ' M,ovement : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 11 ---------------11 ---------------II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top Sign 3top 3ign Rights: Include Include Include Include ' I,anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Voltune Module : Base Vol: 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 8 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 179 149 59 20 143 186 8 16 6 23 25 8 Added Vol: 34 18 0 0 21 26 2 0 2 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 213 167 59 20 164 213 11 16 9 23 25 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . PF:F A-.3j: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volire: 236 165 65 22 182 236 12 18 9 25 27 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Final Vol.: 236 185 65 22 162 236 1-2 18 9 25 27 9 Adjusted Vol-t- Module: Grade: 0% 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : xQOOC xxxx Xooc J%Cotx xMoc 250aoc xxxx Mooc $ Truck/Comb: XXcxx Xooc XUoc X2oc >oooc Iloocx 3cooc .1ooot PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : '10ooc Xoooc >o= Xxaoc >oooc XoQC Xotx XoQOc Trck/Cmb PCE : IN ooot 210 oot .1oQOC xoooc 2CoQC 30= XtXc 31oooc Adj Vol.: 260 185 65 24 182 236 13 20 10 28 30 10 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 NPH « ' Mc>veUp Time: 2.1 mQOC moooc 2.1 xooc xooooc 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxc ' 5. 0xoaoc xaootx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 ------------I ---------------11 Capacity Module: ' Cnflict Vol: 418 xxxx xxxxc 250 xooot xxxtx 793 808 300 789 893 218 Potent Cap.: 1084 xxxx xooocx 1303 xoooc xaoooc 368 411 976 370 371 1074 Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xooooc 1.00 xooot xooncs 0.70 0.70 1.00 0.72 0.70 1.00 Move Cap.: 1084 xoQOC xxoQC 1303 xxxx xoooc 257 288 976 267 260 1074 ------------I ---------------11 Lev+el Of Service Module : 3 topped Del : 4. 2xoooc xooxt 2. 8xootx xooooc 14.7 13.3 3.7 14.9 15.5 3.4 LO S by MQVe : A A * * * * * * * M,ovement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I.T - LTR - RT shared Cap.: xoooc xooc xooocx xooac xoocc xooccc xxxx 332 xoosxc xxxx 297 xootxc 3hrd 3 tpDel : .Nooosx icoQC -ooooc mo= NcQOC maocc Nxooc 12.3 xxxoc xooQCC 15.3 xooQQc Shared L03: * * * * * * * C * * C ~ ApproachDel: 2.2 0.2 11.4 13.4 Traffix Syetem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Ialand Pacific Eng . . , a _:4, n•t. n Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:06:29 Page 10-1 TURT*LE CREEK APPROVED PLAT3 AND TURTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Ievel Of 3ervice Camputation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Voliaoe Alternative) *rrw***********,t*~***,►*f**~,r****rtrr~r*~r~r~r~**~,►***,~****~**,t**#,►**,r,r**,t*******~,►s~** Interaection #22 3prague b Apploway . *~t:f*************#,►~►*t~~r~►**~►,r,r,~*,►r**,~**,►,►,►***r*~**,r,r,►~,r**,►~*:ft*rt►*~+t:*~►*tr,r**** . Averaqe Delay (sec/vuh): 4.0 Worst Case Level Of 3ervice: D t,tt*lr~s,t:*t*,►*t►*twtwtw***ttr~lt,tlt*ttfr,trt*trrt+tt~t**te**,r***,►**~tr*t*~*w*t,t+t*~*tr***,t**,r* - , Approach: North Bound South Bound Eaat Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R . Control: 3tap sign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights : Includ,e Includ,e Includ,e Include Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module : Base Vol: 111 1 3 2 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Hse: 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 324 73 1 386 6 ~ A,dd,ed Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 28 0 Initial Eut: 117 1 3 2 1 7 5 328 80 1 414 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.64 PHF Volume: 139 1 4 2 1 9 6 390 95 1 491 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _l Final Vol.: 139 1 4 2 1 9 6 390 95 1 491 7 ~ Adjuated Voltaae Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cass : xxxx xxxx XK3ot >oooc 30oat xxxx Xooc >0ot ~ $ Truck/Comb: )QOOC .10oot Xocx xxxx XXooc "Qcx Xoot FCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PG'E : )oooc 2oocc Xooc Xocx XoQC Xoot .1oooc >o= Trck/Cab PCE : XX=c 20= >o= Xooc 3oooc >oocx x0ooc xxoos Adj Vol.: 153 1 4 3 1 9 7 390 95 1 491 7 Critical Gap Mcdule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/'W).: 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.1 xxxx xooocc 2.1 xooQC xooooc Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 7.0 6.5 5.5 5. 5xoooc xooooc 5.5 xxxx xxooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 941 943 242 895 987 249 499 xooc xocooc 484 x~oot xooooc Potent Cap.: 265 306 1044 284 289 1035 925 xxxx xoocxoc 942 xococ xooQc Adj Cap : 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 xooc xoxoc 1.00 xxxx xooooc Mcve Cap.: 259 302 1044 279 285 1035 925 xxxx xootxc 942 xoooc xooooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 . Level Of Service Module: 9 tarpped Del : 29.6 11.9 3.5 13.0 12.7 3.5 3. 9xoooc xooooc 3. 8xoQC xosxooc " L03 by Move: D * w * * * p, t ~ A. * * • M,ovement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ' Shazed Cap. : xoo~c xcoot 647 xooQC 574 xooooc xocaoc xoooc xooooc xxxx xocot xccxoc 9hrd 3tpDe1: xx~oc xxxx 5. 6 mo= 6.4 xoooc x== xoocc >oQOOC mccoc xoooc >ooQQc Sharad I,09: * * 8 +t B : t ~ * ~ * ApproachDel: 28.8 6.3 0.1 0.0 Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inlaad Pacific Eng 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:29 Page 11-1 TURTLE CREEK APPR0VED PLATS AND TURTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR . Lev+el Of service Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Fliture Volimre Alternative) **~~~**w*,r,t*,r,r******~*,►,r,r,r:**::**~r**:**,r**w***,t,t,t*~t~*w,r*~*~~***********,t*****,t Intersection #30 BARKER/EB I-90 FtAMP3 k,r,t*****~,r+r*t*t~w*,t*****~**,tttr*tt****,r*:,r,r,t********,tt,►t*#~t~*,t******~*,t*,►,r,t~**s* Average Delay (aec/veh): 2.0 Worat Case Lcv+el Of Service: C *f~:*,ct~**,►****,r,t~t,~,t**~r*****,r****,~~ttr**,t*t+r,~s,r,►+r*t**~,~***,r*~tr*~:~t~*rr*,r*~**,r****~,~ Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound M,ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R . Control: Uncontrolled Uncoatrolled Stop 3ign 3top 3ign Rights: Includ,e Include Includ,e Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Vol-imoe Module : Base Vol: 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 0 355 9 47 103 0 83 1 24 0 0 0 , Added Vol: 0 42 7 7 17 0 9 0 12 0 0 0 Initial Ftit: 0 397 16 54 120 0 93 1 35 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volie: 0 438 17 59 132 0 102 1 39 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Final Vol.: 0 436 17 59 132 0 102 1 39 0 ,0 0 Adjusted Voltutie M,odule: Grade: 0% 0$ 0% 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : 30oos xx~oc Xoos 30oQC .43= 311oaoc 30oQC ?D= % Truck /Comb : >ocxx 30oos XNooc xxxx x~ Xooc >oooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : X)oQt Xooc . 2onoc ,.o= xKtx xxxx Xooc XKXoc Trck/Cnb PCE : Xooc >ocxx x~ 2oQOt 3oooc xMooc ~ooQC XXXc A,dj Vol.: 0 438 17 65 132 0 112 1 43 0 0 0 Critical Gap -Module: » Population: 300000 Run Speed(N/3).: 30 MPH « - Mov+eUp Time: xooQQC xooQC xosxxx 2.1 xoooc xooQOC 3.4 3.3 2.6 xoosxoc Xoot X)oooc Cri tical Gp :xooooc xxxx xxxooc 5.0 xxxx xoQCx 6.5 6.0 5. 5xx)oc xxxx xxoooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 Capaci ty M,adule : Cnf l i c t Vo l: xococ xQOt xooooc 455 xooQC xcoooc 638 647 132 xoooc xxxx xooooc ~oooc xx~c ~oot~Qc Po tent C ap xoooc xxxx xooooc 1040 xxxx xot)oot 452 499 1187 Adj Cap : aoQOC xosxot xooooc 1.00 xoooc xotxotx 0.93 0.93 1.00 xxxx xxxx matxx Mov+e Cap.: xxxx xxxx xmooc 1040 xxxx =ocx 421 465 1187 xoooc xoooc xxoooc ------------I I,evel Of 3ervice Module : 3 topped Del :xooooc xoooc xx~oot 3.7 xooc xoooQC 11.3 7.8 3.1 ~oooQC xxxx xxxooc IA9 by Move : * * * A p, * * ,r M,ovement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - I.TA - RT shared Cap. : mooc >o= xoooot >oooc -oooc x~oooc 422 xonoc xooooc xooc xoooc xoQOOs Shrd 3tpDe1: 2oooos )oQCx xxooc mo= xooc x3ooc 11.3 xooos mo= moQOC aoooc 2oocxoc Shared LOB: * * * * * * C * * * * AgproachDel: 0.0 1.2 9.0 0.0' Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng . • „ ~ 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:06:29 Page 12-1 TiTRTLE CREEK APPROVED PLP,TS ANID TURTLE CREEK AM PEAK HOUR Lev+el Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture, Voliune Alternative) ******:**,►,r~*~,►*~***t*~,~#*~t,rtf:*:~~e***,►rr~*,►***tt*rr******,r******,►,►**:#:**~r~►****,► . Intersection #55 3prague 6 Long *rr,r*,r,r******:*t***t***:~,t~►,t,t***,t******,r~,►*,►,~~,r~r**:*:**+rf~*w********~~r#,r,t*r►****,r,t Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.3 Worst Case Levp-l Of 3ervice: A ~********it*~*t*A*t*1*t*****t**~*******t***~t~#***ttlr***tlr~***t!***A**i4*****ttt**tk* Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound Weat Bound Movement : L - T - R I, - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R 11---------------~ Control: Stop Sign 3top Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Includ,e Include Inciude Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 II--------------- I Voltane Module : • Base Vol: 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 _ Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 • PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 50 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 48 5 66 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHE' Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Vol-lmme : 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 52 6 72 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 52 6 72 0 ~ Adjusted Voltmke Module: Grade: 0$ 0% 0$ 0$ % Gycle/Cars : >ooot Xxooc Xoooc .1<2oc xx= Xocx IooQC XQOc $ Truck/Comb: xKXoc >0oot 2oooc xmoc '-ooot >oooc >o= x0ooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PGE: XcXoc >otxx 31ooQC =oQC Xoot 2ooos xXXoc XXooc Trck/C=b PCE : 3cooc *ooQC 3oooc 2oooc >cooc xMoc 3*QOOC Xooc Adj Vol.: 61 0 27 0 0 0 0 67 52 6 72 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « Mov+eUp Time : 3.4 xoQOC 2. 6 3ooooc xxxx xmooc xooooc xcooc =oac 2.1 xooc xoooQC Cri ti cal Gp: 6.5 xxxx 5. 5=os xoooc xooooc xoooc 2ocKxx 5. 0xcxoc xxxoc -I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol : 171 xxxx 93 xxxx xocxoc xooox xxxx xxxx xooooc 119 xooot xoooc Potent Cap. : 843 xxxx 1243 xxxx xxxx xxoxc xooc xooo{ xooooc 1504 xxxx xxooc Adj Cap: 1.00 xoooc 1.00 xoccs xoooc MoQOC xoooc xooQC xooooc 1.00 xxxx xooooc ~ Move Cap.: 840 xxxx 1243 xaooc »cxoc xxoooc xoos xxxx xoooos 1504 xxxx xaooQS , I . I,evel Of 9ervice M,odule : stopped Del: 4.6 xocxos 3.0 xooooc xoooc xooooc xoofloc scxooc xxooQC 2.4 xoooc xoooos L09 by Move: A Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT • 9hared Cap. : xoooc 934 xxoos xcoot xoooc xoooQC xooc xoooc xooQOC xooc xoooc xooQOc 3hrd 3tpDel:moocc 4.2 ~ooooc xooQOC xxxx xcoooc xooooc xoooc =tKooc xxooQC ~oooc ,coooc 9hared LOS: ~ A * * * * * t * * w AppzoachDel: 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 - Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng sat Oct 7, 1995 07:08:35 Page 1-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS ANID TURTLE CREEK PM PF.AK HOUR Trip Generation Report pM PEAK HOUR Forecast for 2one Rate Rate Trips Tripa Tota1 $ Of ' # 3ubzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Tota1 ~ ~ 4 RIVERVUI►K 120.00 3FDU 0.66 0.35 79 42 121 46.5 Zone 4 3ubtotal 79 42 121 46.5 5 T'tJRTLE CREEK 101.00 sFDU 0.66 0.36 67 36 103 39.6 Zone 5 3ubtotal 67 36 103 39.6 . 6 MEADOWVIEW R 35.00 sFDU 0.66 0.36 23 13 36 13.8 Zone 6 9ubtotal 23 13 36 13.8 TOTAL 169 91 260 100.0 Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceneed to Inlaad Pacific Eng . . _ 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:08:35 Page 2-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AND TURTLE CREEK PM PEAK HOUR Trip Distribution Report • Percent Of -Tripa To Gates 3 8 9 11 12 , Zone 4 '10.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40.0 5 40.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 45.0 6 10.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 ~ . ~ I Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:08:35 Page 3-1 TURTZ.E CREEK APPROVED PLATS A2ID TIJR'I7E CREEK PM PEAK HOUR Turning Movement Report , Volume Northbound 3outhbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume #2 Saltese 6 sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #6 8th L Barker Base 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 148 Added 0 0 0 23 0 43 34 0 0 0 0 13 113 Total 1 33 5 48 59 45 34 1 0 7 0 28 261 #7 3prague & Barker • Base 12 45 5 76 88 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 442 Added 0 47 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 Total 12 92 5 76 153 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 555 #8 Agpleway ~ Barker Base 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 1320 Ardded 14 29 4 4 53 4 8 0 5 8 0 8 137 _ Total 39 136 26 12 201 180 150 310 26 28 334 15 1457 #10 WB Ramps 6 Barker Base 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 991 Added 22 50 0 0 17 17 8 0 B 0 0 0 122 Total 115 399 20 12 278 134 50 9 15 27 31 23 1113 #11 Miasion b Barker Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 2 55 24 5 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 128 Total 0 2 55 24 5 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 128 #13 24th ~ Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aaclea o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 To tal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 #14 16th ~ Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #15 4th s suliivan ' Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng -s. , . _ ~ . sat Oct 7, 1995 07:08:35 Page 3-2 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS ANID 'IRJRTLE CREEK - PM PZAK HOUR Volluae Northbound 3outhbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Voltim►e #16 3prague b 3ullivan Base 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ad.ded 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 20 0 57 Tota1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 20 0 57 #22 3prague 6 Appleway• Base 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 1386 Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 24 0 18 0 57 Total 90 1 4 0 0 13 6 549 197 3 572 6 1443 4I25 TRENT 6 AnRKF.R Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 43 Total 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 43 #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RiMP3 Base 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 1020 Added 0 40 4 4 21 0 32 0 41 0 0 0 142 Total 0 342 40 73 235 0 266 1 203 0 0 0 1162 #55 Sprague 6 Long - Base 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 8 84 0 269 Add,ed 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 26 Tota1 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 41 8 84 0 295 Traffix system Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng s ~ 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 4-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PI+ATS 11NID TtJItTLE CREEK - PM pF.Ac xovR Iapact Analysia Report , Level Of 3ervice Intersection Base Future Chanqe Del/ V/ Del/ v/ in . LOS Veh C IA3 Veh C ~ 6 Bth 6 Barker A 1.0 0.000 H 1.6 0.000 + 0.000 V/C • # 7 3prague b Barker A 2.7 0.309 A 9.2 0.366 + 0.056 V/C # 8 Appleway 6 Barker C 16.4 0.463 C 15.6 0.519 -0.780 D/V # 10 WB Raaips & Harker C 2.4 0.000 D 3.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 22 3prague b Appleivay F 5.5 0.000 F 7.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~i 30 SARIER/EB I-90 RAMP3 D 5.9 0.000 E 9.6 0.'000 + 0.000 V/C ~I 55 3prague & Long A 0.5 0.000 A 0.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Traffix 3yatem Veraion 6.6 (c) 1995 DA Liceaeed to Inland Pacific Eng 1r ' sat Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 5-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS APID TURTI,E CREEK PM PEAK HOUR Level Of 3ervice Coaputation Report 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Etiture Volt~e A1 ternative) ~►,r:*w**tr*~**tttrt**rt*,t~r,r***~r•,r*f**:*~**:*,~,t****:~►,t*,t*,t*,t~*t*,t*tt,►t►,►tr*,t*,r,►**~,►**,r* Interaection #6 8th & Barker **,t,r*,t,t~*f***,t***,t,~,t**~,►,rwt::f~*#:*::*,r~*t*t*~ir,t*,r,►~r~et~*,►,r~~*~*,►*~~►,~,~~~►*,r*te~tr*** , Averag+e Delay (aec/veh): 1.6 Worst Case Level Of 9ervice: H - ,r*x*t**,t,r*,~*~t,rt*~*ir******,r**,►*~►,c,t,t,r,►,►,r,►~*s,r,t*,r+►t**~,rt*tr,rwfw**:t,►,tttrs**,r*,r**w*,r~ ' Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound East Bound West Bound ; Mov+ement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - A I, - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 9top 3ign 3top 3ign Rights : Includre Include Include Incluae Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 . Volt~e Module:' Base Vol: 1 32 5 24 57 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Irutial Bse: 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Added Vol: 0 0 0 23 0 43 34 0 0 0 0 13 Initial Etiat: 1 33 5 48 59 45 34 1 0 7 0 28 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.62 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 . PHF Vol-'=e: 1 40 6 58 72 55 42 1 0 9 0 35 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 40 6 58 72 55 42 1 0 9 0 35 Adjuated Volimme Module: Gzade: 0$ 0% 0$ 0$ $ Gyicle/Cars : xaoos xoooc ~ooot Xoos 2oooc 3oooc JXooc 20ax $ Truck/Comb: =ooc .1ooot "o= Xooc 2ooos .10oos Moot X)ooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/car PCE : >ooot 2oooc x.Iotx .1oooc 20QOC XooQC 20ooc Joooc Trck/Gnb PCE : xXotx Xooc XxQOC XXooc 'Iooot =ooc Xxoot 2oooc Adj Vol.: 1 40 6 64 72 55 46 1 0 10 0 38 Critical Gap Madule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 NPH « M+ovaUp Time : 2.1 xaoot xooQtx 2.1 xxxx xooQOC 3.4 3.3 xxQOOC 3. 4xooot 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xoaooc 5.0 xooos xocxtx 6.5 6.0 xoQOOC 6.5 xoooc 5.5 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 126 xxxx xoooQC 47 xoooc xoooQC 219 205 xoooac 203 xoooc 43 Po tent Cap.: 1492 xooot xooooc 1629 xoot xoxxc 790 851 xotxoot 8 0 8xoooc 1316 Adj Cap: 1.00 xcooc xcocxC 1.00 xoooc xooooc 0.94 0.96 xooaos 0.97 xoooc 1.00 Move Cap.: 1492 xcooc xooooc 1629 xoooc xooooz 742 814 xoooc 780 xoooc 1316 ------------I ---------------11 11 . I+evel Of Service Module : s toppcci Del : 2. 4xoooc xocooc 2. 3xoocx xooooc 5.1 4. 4xooooc 4.7 xxxx '2. 8 LOS by M,ove: A * * A * w * : * * * Mov+ement : LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT shared Cap.: xoooc xxxx xocxoc -coos xoQOC >ooQOC 744 xQOCC xoooat xoooc 1156 xooooc 9hrd 8 tpDel : xocQOt xxxx xooooc xooooc xxxx xooocx 5.1 xooot xooooc xoooc 3.2 xooooc 3hared IAS : * * * * * • B * * * A ApproachDel: 0.1 0.8 5.1 3.2 Traffix 8yetem Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA -Liceneed to Ialand Pacific Eag 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 6-1 • TURTLE CREEK APFROVED PLATS AIID TURTLE CREEK PM PEAK HOUR Lev+el Of Service Computation Report 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (EUture Voltane Alternative) ****,►,t*,t,t*~~,~*,t:::r:t~~~~~~rttr***,t*:,r*~r*s*:*:::::*~e*,►**t:*t*::*t,tt,r*,t*~rtr~**,t,~**~r Intereection #7 3prague 6 Harker . - • *****:**,r*,►,r,►~**t**t,r:,►*#*:~*:*~*,►~::~~*tr*,►,►****r~~~**t~:~r,r**,r,r,r**r~***,r**,r**~*: G'ycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.366 _ Loss Time (sec) : 6 Av+erag+e Delay (aec/veh) : 3.2 Optimal Gycle : 0 Level Of 9ervice : A w*r****,t*,r*~*,r,t~t*~,r,t**~*wt:,r,t,t,t,r,►*,►,t**~►**,r,r~****:~*,r**,rw**,r*~f,t~***:*t,►,►**,►,►r►*~ Approach: North Bouad South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Rights: Include Znclude Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 . Volie Module : Baae Vol: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PaeserByVol: 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 12 45 5 76 • SB 28 14 59 33 9 28 49 Add,ed Vol: 0 47 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 12 92 5 76 153 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volie: 13 101 6 83 167 30 3.6 64 36 10 30 48 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 101 6 83 167 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NII.F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 13 101 6 83 167 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 II II I Saturation Flow Module: 3at/Lane: 644 644 644 766 766 766 422 422 422 355 355 355 Adjua traent: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 •1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.84 0.05 0.30 0.59 0.11 0.14 0.55 0.31 0.11 0.34 0.55 Final 3at.: 70 542 32 227 457 82 58 233 131 40 121 194 I Capacity Analyaia Module: - Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.25 Crit Mcves • ***t I il II--------------- Level Of 3ervice M,odule : Delay/Veh: 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 2.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.6 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 I,OS by Move : A A A A A A A A A A A A *tf*,r*tt~f**~►*w*:w~*~►:****:***~:~r~**:x*:t~*,►r~:*~r~wtf~*tr~**~~:**fw~***,t***,r***w* Traffix 9yatean Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceased to Inland Pacific Eng . 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 7-1 TURTLE CItEEK APPROVED PLATS ANID TURTLE CREEK , PM PEAK HOUR , Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Operationa Method (Eliture Volie Alternative) *~,r**,r**,r,►+r**~**,►t~e~:~r~**~r***,w~r,r**,►***~****~,r**~*,r,r**,►***,r***,t~t******,►***,r*~r**,r: Intersection #B Appleway & Barker *te**,t*,►****,t**~~,t*~*w**:***,t~**,r**,►*~f,r**:*********~~**s,r,r~*,t,r****~*#**,►,►*~,r*~r** Gycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.519 . ' Loss Time (aec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Av+erage Delay (aec/v+eh) : 15.6 Opti.mal Gycle: 41 Leve1 Of 9ervice: C • ,t,►,tt,r,r***,►,►****s,t****~**#,r**+t***~rr,r*,r*tf*+►+t,r,t*t,t*,t********,t**~~:*,t,►~,r*~***,t***,t* ' Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound , M.ovement : I, - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Righte: Includ,e Include Include - Include 1-iin. Green: ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I 11 , Vol1- Module : Base Vol: 24 104 21 B 144 171 138 301 21 19 324 7 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PaaserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 Ad,ded Vol: 14 29 4 4 53 4 8 0 5 8 0 6 . Initial Fut: 39 136 26 12 201 -180 150 310 26 28 334 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Voltaae: 40 141 27 13 209 188 156 322 27 29 347 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 40 141 27 13 209 188 156 322 27 29 347 16 FCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NII.F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 Final Vol.: 40 141 27 13 209 188 156 339 29 29 364 17 ------------I 11 8aturation Flow M,odule: • 3at/I,ane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuatment: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.82 0.82 0:82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 Lanea: 0.19 0.68 0.13 0.03 0.51 0.46 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 1.91 0.09 Final 3at.: 232 816 156 50 797 717 1805 3466 296 1805 3594 168 ------------I Capacity Analyais Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.10 0.10 Crit Mavea: *+►+r* •*+r,~ *tf,r Green/Gycle: 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.17 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.20 0.20 Volie/Cap: 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.52 0.52 ------------I Level Of 9ervice Module: Delay/Veh: 8.7 8.7 8.7 10.2 10.2 10.2 23.4 15.4 15.4 27.3 21.5 21.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • AdjDel/Veh: 8.7 8.7 8.7 10.2 10.2 10.2 23.4 15.4 15.4 27.3 21.5 21.5 Queue : 1 2 0 0 4 3 4 6 1 1 8 0 **,t**f*~,t,~tr**~,r****,r~►w,r~r~~~*tr******r****~,rt~~t*~~,tf,t*,~R~*f***:***~,t~**,t*f~***tr~►~,► Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceneed to =nland Pacific Eng Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 8-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS ANID TURTLE CREEK PM PEAC HOUR Lev+el Of 3ervice Detailed Coaputation Report 1994 HCaS Operatione Method . Euture Voliae Alternative *:*f*~*******,r*,ttr*~t*,►*******,r*,►,►*~e*~*+~,r~,r*,rr,r,r,r**,►,r*rr*,r,r*w*t**,r***~:*::*:*:,r:*ft - Intersection #8 Appleway & Barker ,►,~*,~,rt*:****f::t:,rt~*~:*,►tf**:~r*,r:**t*******t*~***~rs~*,r*~***,►****:**~r***~***:,r,r Approach: North Bound South Bound Eaat Bouad Weat Bouad Mov+ement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization MQdule: Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group : LTR LTR LTR I,TR LTR I.TR I, RT RT L RT RT #LnslnGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 I II--------------- HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0% 0$ 0$ 0$ Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus 3tp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Z'ype : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Ar: 0 0 0 0 Excluaiv+eRT: Include Include Include Include $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 11 II I - HCM Opa f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: f(rt) Case: 7 7 7 7 7 7 xooos 5 5 xxxx 5 5 f(lt) Case: 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 xxxx xoQOC 1xcQC xoooc I II--------------- HCM Ops 3aturation Adj M,odule: . I,n Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8ev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Bus Stp Adj: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xaooc 1.00 1.00 - Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.84 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xoooc 0.99 0.99 LT Adj : 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 xooc xoQOOC 0.95 xxxx xootx HCM 9at Adj: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 - Uar 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2rB,.F 3at Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 E'n1 3at Adj: 0.63 0.63. 0.63 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 11 ---------------il II I De1ay Adjuatment Factor M,odule: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3igaal Type: «<<<« < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 ,t,trrt**,t~****,t*:,►f*tr~*:**tr,tftr***tr,t***,t**,►**~***k*~*~1ww,►*~f*f:****f:**f*~!*:,►*~lrA Traffix Syetem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng .'y • o • . i:l. 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 8-2 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS AAID TITRTLE CFtEEK PM PEAK HOUR , Level Of Service Detailed Coaputation Report (Permitted Left Turn sat Adj) ~ • 1994 HCM Operations Method , Euture Volicre Alternative ' ***tt►,►*,r*~r~*xw****~t***t***~,►+t*,r***,t***w**w~►+r,t~►~*~***,r*******ttr**tr*~t~*:~*,r,►tr,r*~tw Intersection #8 Appleway b Barker • ' • *t*~r,r*,r,►r*,►,t**,rw,►t►**~r**',►*+r*,t*********~~*******,►,r**,►*,r****rr***~*+~*s,t,►~*~**~**~~etr* Approach: North South East West Cycle Length, C: • 90 90 xoQOOOC ao30ooc Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 45.38 45.38 xoooooc >oooooc ' Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 45.38 45.38 xxxxxx JX2ooocx I Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 45.38 45.38 xoooooc XXocxx ~ Number Of Opposing Lanes, No : 1 1 xxotxooc -xxxxxx Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xxxxxx ~oo3ooc ~ Adj us ted Lef t-Turn Fl ow Aa te , Vl t: 40 13 xooaoc >oooooc Pro ortion of Left Turns in Lane Gro ~ p up, Pl t: 0.19 0.03 xQOOOt >oKX3= Proportion of Left Turne in Opp Flow, Plto : 0.03 0.19 xoooooc Xogooc I,eft Turns Per Gycle, I,TC: 1.00 0.33 xxoaoc XoQOOC I Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 410 208 xooooQC >ooooos , Oppoaing Flow Per Lane Per Gycle, Volc: 10.25 5.20 xooooc 3ooootx • Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo : 1.00 1.00 xxxxxx ~oooooc Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xoooQOC XoXoc • E f f grn unti 1 arrival of lef t- tvrn car, gf : 15.20 25 . 69 xoooooc =ooQOt ~ opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.50 0.50 xooooo{ 3oooooc ~ Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 9.83 4.25 xoooooc XX30oc Eff grn while left turns filter.thru, gu: 30.18 19.69 xoooocx 1110cx:)= Max opposing cazs arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.40 0.00 xxxxxx )oooocx Proportion of Oppoaing Thru 6 RT cazs, ptho: 0.97 0.81 xoooot ~oooooc Left-turn Saturation Factor, fa: 2000ooc 30CVooc *<3cxoooc 2o30ooc Proportion of Left Turns in 3hared Lane, pl: ~0CX3ooc Xooooc Xooooot " 21oooooc Through-car Equivalents, ell: 4.83 2.29 xoooosx XotXooc Single Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xocoooc 3oogooc Minzm+n++ Left Turn Adjuatzaent Factor, fmin: 0.05 0.05 xoooooc 3oootxu 3ingle Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.72 0.98 xxxxxx 2CMDOooc Lef t Turn Adj us tinen t Fac tor , f 1 t: 0.72 0.98 xoooxoc JXoQOOc rr*~*r******,t~,t*,t*~***,r**~~~*,t,t*w*,t,t**:~rw*rt~t*,►~******t**t****w*********:*~***~* Traffix 9ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng , . . . sat Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 9-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS }1AID TiJFtTLE CREEK PM PEAK HOUR I.ev+el Of 3ervice Camputation Report 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Puture Volie Alternative) •****::t+t**~**w*,r*,r~t~+►:*,r,t,t~*rr*~**********~r***w***~**+r*******:~~►~►**,►*~*~e***,►,r*** Intereectioa l110 WB Rwapa & Barker - *,r*~~~#s,r**,r***,t****,r**,t*,r***~*~t~*w~r~*~r,►*t*:*****,r~**,►**~w**,rt,t**tr*,►*r**ifrr,t**,~* Average Delay ( eec/vph) : 3.0 Wors t Case I,evel Of service : D ,r,►,t*~f***f,r***,►****f**,t*w*****~+t,t~t*,t**,t**t*,t**~,tw,►t~,r**,►*+t,r*:*t,►:*f,t*,r,r~~~*,t~*~ Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound $aat Bound West Bound Mbvement : I, - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R - Control: Uncontrolled Unccntrolled Stop 3ign 9top 3ign Righte : Include IacltLde Include Include I,aneB: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 • 0 0 1! 0 0 Volt- Module: Haae Vol: 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 Added Vol: 22 50 0 0 17 17 8 0 8 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 115 399 20 12 278 134 50 9 15 27 31 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 128 446 22 14 311 150 56 10 17 30 35 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Final Vol.: 128 446 22 14 311 150 55 10 17 30 35 25 Adjuated Volt~e Module : Gra,d,e: 0$ 0$ 0t 0$ $ Gycle/Cara : Xxc~ot Mooc Xooc Xooc *ooot .10ooc 31COM Xxxos $ Truck/Comb: =ooc 20= Xocs XXcX 3oooc 2oooc 32COCc >ooot FCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 'Lyicl /Car PCE : .143oot x= Ioooc .10oot 210ooc 30oQt Mooc 30aoc TxcJc/Cmb PCE : J"ooQC "<~oc ~xx 203M )ooot 31oooc XoQt xXooc Adj Vol.: 141 446 22 15 311 150 62 11 19 33 38 28 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 MPH « Mv+eUp Time : 2.1 xooQC xooooc 2.1 xoooc xooooc 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 C.ri tical Gp : 5. 0xxoxs xxxxx 5. 0xxxc xoccos 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 I ---------------il--------------- 11 Capacity Module: . Cnflict Vol: 461 xooQS xxxxx 468 xoooc xoooQC 1015 996 386 999 1060 457 Potent Cap.: 1034 xoooc xoQOOC 1026 xonxc xxoaoc 274 327 883 280 303 812 Adj Cap: 1.00 xaoxc xooQC 1.00 xoooc xooooc 0.72 0.80 1.00 0.80 0.80 1.00 M,ove Cap.: 1034 xcoQC xooooc 1026 xoooc xoooct 196 260 883 223 241 812 ------------I 11 Ioevel Of service Module: 9toppQd Del: 4.0 xoooc xooxot 3.6 xxooc xxxxx 25.6 14.4 4.2 18.6 17.4 4.6 LOS by Mov+e : A * * A * * ~ * * w * * Mcv+ement: I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT shared Cap.: xcocc xoooc xxoooc xoooc xoooc xooQOC xoooc 242 xaQOOC xooQC 291 xccooc ' 9hrd 3 tpDel :xooooc xoooc xxxxx xooooc xoooc xoooQC xooooc 22.6 xxoooc xoooc 17.9 aoooQc Shared I,03: * * * * * ~ t D * * C • ApproachDel: 0.9 0.1 19.8 14.2 Traffix 3yatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . / . - . Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:08:36 Page 10-1 TLTRTLE CREEK APPROVED PLATS ANID T[7A'IZE CREEK PM PEAK HOUR Level Of 3ervice Computation RePort 1994 HGM Unsignalized Method (Etiiture Voliare Alternativ+e) ~r,t,t*,►t,►rw**~~~►:*#~,r,t,t~t~*:~:~►~,t****w~r*,►,t**~*,r*w**:,r*t*w***stt*~t*~**t:t*~r~r***+~***~ Intersection #22 3prague L Appleway f~ki**iAr1el~F~►~**~f***~M~lA*+tAlr*#l~ilrfttfft~t****#R~'***tt!!***~r'R*!!rf!*tt**!r~*+ItF***~~~~**!r Av+erage Delay (sec/veh) : 7.0 Worst Case Level Of 3ervice: F • w*,t~:**~►,~~►****~,t:****~r**rr**,►****,t***,t*,r**,►t**f,►,►st~**~►**t►***~~*t**~rt*t*,r*f~►,►**,t* Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Hound MAVement : I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: stop 3ign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Includs I,anes : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Voltune Module : Base Vol: 86 1 4 0 0 13 6 521 168 3 538 6 ' Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ' PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 Added Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 24 0 18 0 Initial Etiit: 90 1 4 0 0 13 6 549 197 3 572 6 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.6q 0.89 O.B9 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Voltaae: 101 1 5 0 0 15 7 615 221 3 640 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 101 1 5 0 0 15 1' 615 221 3 640 7 Adjusted Volie Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ % Gycle/cara : xQOS xoaoc aoaoc xxxc xoooc xoooc %Dooc Mooc $ TrucklComb: >oooc 20oQC XXooc xxXoc .1aooc ,)oooc ~ooQC x~ PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl/Car PCE : JNocxx 3ocxx XXos >o= llcosx 3oooc 310 ooc N ooQc TrcJc/Gmb PCE : Xxaoc .10ooc 3ocxc MOoc xXXoc MOoc xocx 310 ooc Adj Vol.: 111 1 5 0 0 16 8 615 221 4 640 7 Czitical. Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W):' 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2. 6xocxocx xotxoc 2.6 2.1 xaooc xoooc 2.1 xoooc xotxxx Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 xxxxx Xocaoc 5.5 5.5 xooQC xooooc 5.5 xxxx xxxoc.x ------------I 11 Capacity Madule: • Cnflict Vol: 1383 1382 418 xxxx xxxx 324 647 xxxx xxxxai 835 xcooc xxxxx Potent Cap.: 138 169 851 xoocx xx3cx 949 770 x)= xxxoac 610 xxxx xoccot Adj Cap: 0.96 0.97 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xooocc 1.00 xx= xxxxc Move Cap.: 133 164 851 xoo~s xxxx 949 770 xoooc xxxQC 610 xx)m xxocxx ------------I ---------------~f--------------- if Ievel Of service Module : 3topped De1:101.2 22.0 4.3 xnoooc xxxx 3.9 4.7 xooc xootxs 5.9 xotxoc xooocc LOS by Move : I+' * ~ * * A A w• * B * rr blovement : I,T - L7R - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT shared Cap.: x~ocs xxxx 464 xoooc 3oooc xxxxc xonoc xcoc xooooc xoooc x)ooc xxxcx 8hrd s tgDel : xxooos xxxx 7.9 xooooc xooQt xoocxc xxoQCx xcoQC xxxcc xoosxx xooc xxoooc 9hared IA3: f ~ B * * * * * * t * * ApproachDel: 96.1 3.9 0.0 0.0 Traffix 3yateal Vexsion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inlaad Pacific Eng . • , Sat Oct 7, 1995 07:08:37 Page 11-1 ' TURTI.E CREEK APPROVED PLATS AND TiJRTLE CREEK PM PF'.AK HOUR Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Volume Alteznative) ,~,►***~*,r***,t*:*rr**~**,r,r,r~et,rt**:,r*,r**,~s~~**,t+~,r****,r:~,r**,r*~****~~rt,r**,t*~w,r*:**,r** ' Interaection #30 BJ~RXER/EB I-90 RAMPB **+►,►**,t****,►*****wtr*t►,t,t,t****~******,rt*,►,r,r~,t,r*t~t~r,t,r*~e***d*~e,t~***,r**tr*~r**,t**~+r,tw,tt Average Dalay (eec/veh): 9.6 _ Worst Caee Ievel Of 3ervice: E ~r,►~***~r**tr*~ef**~*:*+t,t*******t,t********~**t,►~*t*:w**tr*t+t~e~,t*,r,t*,t*:~r,r*tr***w~#s,t*** Approach: Nortb Bound 3outh Bound Eaat Bouad West Bound M,ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T.- R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 3top 3ign Rights: Include Include InclucLe Include I,anes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 40 4 4 21 0 32 0 41 0 0 0 Initial E1ut: 0 342 40 73 235 0 266 1 203 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 359 42 77 247 0 260 1 214 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Fina1 Vol.: 0 359 42 77 247 0 28^ 1 214 0 0 0 Adjusted Volie Module: Gzade: 0% 0$ 0$ 0$ % Cycle/Cars : )o= aooos >oocx >oooc 20ooc .1ooot =ooc Xoooc - % Truck /Camb : xx3M Xs2oc xDocx x2ocx .143ooc 3ooQC >oQ(X 3oosx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE: 2cxxc xxXoc 30QOC xCCoc >oooc 2oocx >0ooc I=ot,x Trck/Cmb PCE : Coc 2CX3oc xxxx xxxx ~oooc XX3cc >oooc INoooc - Adj Vol.: 0 359 42 85 247 0 308 1 235 0 0. 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N13) :'30 MPH « MoveUp Time :mnotx xooc xxocot 2.1 xxxx xataonc 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxQOt x,xoQC xxxooc Cri ti ca1 Gp :moocx xxxx Xoocx 5.0 xxxx xaoocx 6.5 6.0 5. 5xx)oc xoxaQC xooooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------it ---------------11 Capacity Mpdule: cnflict vol: xxxx xxxx xxcxx 402 xxxx xooQCx 705 726 247 xoooc xoooc xxcxc , Poteat Cap.: xxxx xxxx xooooc 1103 xxxx xoaooc 414 454 1038 xoaot xoooc xooocx Adj Cap: x)ooc xooos xxocxc 1.00 xooc xocxocx 0.91 0.91 1.00 xoooc xmcx xacooc Move Cap.: xoooc xoooc xoooQC 1103 xxxx ioQOOC 377 413 1038 xoocc xxxx aocxxc ------------I II I I.oevel Of Service M,odule: 3 topped Del : xoocxc xnoc xooooc 3.5 xxxx xosxcx 35.7 8.7 4.4 ~oooot xxxx moosx LOS by M,ov+e : * * * A * * * * • A * t Mavement : LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT I+T - I,TR - RT I,T - LTR - RT 3hared Cap.: xxxx xeoQC xeesxoc xoQC xxxx =osx 377 xoooc x~cs~c xocxoc xxxx =ooc 9hrd 3 tpDel : moooc xxxx xmQC xoooQC x}ooc mt~= 36.0 xxxx ~ofloct ~ooc~QC xxxx xooooc 9hared L03: : ,r * : * g ' * * * * ApproachDel: 0.0 0.9 22.1 0.0 Traffix 3ystem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng V 3at Oct 7, 1995 07:08:37 ' Page 12-1 TURTLE CREEK APPROVED PI,ATS ANID TURTLE CREEK PM PEAK HOUR • Level Of Service Coaputation Report 1994 H(.M Unsignalized Method (Future Volume A1 ternative) **,►,r*:***,r~*~~r*:+r*~+r:*,►~*:~~*t:****~*,r~*,r,~,r***,r***:*t*,r*t~***,r**,►,~,r,r,r,r****,►***** , Intersection #55 3prague 6 Long - *,r,t*,t**~~t****,t*~t►tr~**f*,r~,r*~►w*,ttr****,t**rr***,~~e~tr+►f:****~►nt►,t~~****~►t**,~+r,r~,~t*w*+e~+r ' Av+erage Delay (eec/veh) : 0.5 Worst Case I,evel Of 3ervice: A , !*,r*f,rir*!**fir~r**tf~1r***:t**tt:*t*1!*tr~r*t*~ir*trA*irfr*trwre*~**********ttrtr**t~t+tlrlttt*,t*it Approach: North Bound South Bound EaBt Bound West Hound Mov+eaeent : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: 3top 3ign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 Voltmtie Module : Base Vol: 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 8 82 0 ; Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserBy.Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 8 84 0 A,cided Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 Initial Etit: 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 41 8 84 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Voltune: 25 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 46 9 94 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina1 Vol.: 25 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 46 9 94 0 - Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0% 0$ 0$ 0% $ Gycle/Cars : xaooc xxxx I'oooc Moot Xxoot 310ooc ~ocxx xx= $ Truck /Camb : >0ooc XcXoc >0ooc 20= >oooc >oovc xxa(x 3oQOc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PCE : XtXot xXoot ,,oooc xxxx xXXx 30oot >cooc Xxooc Trck /0ab PCE : >0ooc Xxooc XKXoc 20= Xoot 20ooc X~ Adj Vol.: 28 0 4 0 0 0 0 152 46 10 94 0 Critical Gap MQdule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « MoveVp Time: 3.4 xoQOC 2.6 xoooc xoot x3o= ,oooa xxxx xooxx 2.1 xxxx xxxQc Critical Gp: 6.5 xnooc 5.5 x=ocx Xoocx =coos Xootx Xooc >000oc 5.0 xcoot xxxoc II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol : 278 xxxx 175 xxxx xxxx xxoaoc xxxx xxxx xooQOC 198 aoooc xoooos ' Potent Cap. : 731 xooQC 112 9 . xooot xoooc xoooot xxxx xoQOt xoooot 13 80 xooQt xxoooc Adj C ap : 0. 9 9xooos 1.00 xxxx xxxx xooooc xooc xooos xoooos 1. 0 0xoooc xxoooc Mave Cap. : 725 xooQC 1129 xooc xxxx aocxxc -xxxx xoooc xooocx 1380 xcaflc socooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 I,evel Of Service Mcdule: 3 topped Del : 5.1 xxxx 3.2 xoooc xoooc xooooc xx)ooc xoooc xooooc 2.6 xoooc xoQCz I,03 by M,ov+e : * • * * t ~ tr +r ~ A * * MQVement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : xoooc 758 xoxooc xxxx xococ xoo~cs xococ xiooc xocooc xoooc xoooc xoaooc 3hrd 3tpDe1: x~ooc 4.9 -aQOCi xooos ,cooc x3ooQC -coooc xoooc -ooooc ~ooooc xoooc xoootx 3hared IA9: * A * * ~ * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 - Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ..:1.[~..✓. • rt r ~ ~ PROJECTED LEVELS OF SERVICE ' FOR PROPUSED ACTIQN ~ WITH APPRUVED AND PR4POSED DEVELOPMENTS , ~ I ~ ~ - l ~ ! ~ ' ~ . 4 V I r ~ i ~ r . ~~~F~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:34 Page 1-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO 24ITIGATION AM PEAK Trip Generation Report AM PEAK HOUR Forecast for ~ Zone Rate Rate Tripa Trips Total $ Of # 3ubzone Amnunt Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 MORNaTGSIDE 120.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 23 66 89 28.8 Zone 1 9ubtotal 23 66 89 28.8 3 I-1EADOWVIEW T 40.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 8 22 30 9.7 Zone 3 3ubtotal B 22 30 9.7 4 RIVERIqALK 120.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 23 66 89 28.8 ' Zone 4 3ubtotal 23 66 89 28.8 5 TURTLE CREEK 101.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 19 56 75 24.3 Zone 5 Subtotal 19 56 75 24.3 6 MEADOWVIEW R 35.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 7 19 26 6.4 Zone 6 subtotal 7 19 26 8.4 TOTAL 80 229 309 100.0 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng ;Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 2-1 ` --------------------a-__--------------_-_-_---------___-__------------__--------- '~CFRTLE G'RMK BVIM OVT WI'I'H PROJECT, NO MITIGATIbN AM PEAR Trip I}istr3.buticrr -Fteport Percent Of Trips , ; To Gates - 2 3 6 7 $ 9 il 12 Zane ~ _ i 0.0 5.0 30,0 5,0 20.0 5.0 10.0 25.0 3 0,0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 . 4 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40.4 = s 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 45.0 6 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20,0 45.0 i ~ . M [j Traffix Systen Yersiarx 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Lacoensed t4 Inlasad Pacific Eng ~ . ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 3-1 TiTRTLE CREEK - BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO MLTZGATION AM PEAK ' Turning Movement Report Volume Northbound 9outhbound Eastbound Westbound Tota1 • Zype Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Aight Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Voltune #2 3alteae b 3ullivan Base 0 286 25 35 82 0 0 0 0 60 0 167 - 655 Added 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 36 ' Total 0 286 25 44 82 0 0 0 0 60 0 193 691 • 116 8 th & Barker ' Base 2 39 2 13 27 0 3 0 4 5 0 18 113 Added 0 62 0 7 22 12 53 0 0 0 0 19 175 Total 2 101 2 20 49 12 56 0 4 5 0 37 288 #7 sprague & Barker Base 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 B 49 111 409 . Addecl 0 134 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 175 Total 24 232 6 11 81 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 584 #8 Appleway & Barker Base 45 173 23 5 50 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 858 Added 24 86 24 7 30 7 2 0 2 9 0 2 193 - Total 69 259 47 12 81 113 58 215 14 31 147 5 1051 #10 VID Raaps b Bazker Baae 179 149 59 20 143 186 B 16 6 23' 25 8 823 Added 60 22 0 0 23 26 2 0 6 0 0 0 140 Total 239 171 59 20 166 213 11 16 12 23 25 8 963 #11 Misaion & Barker Baee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 8 16 7 3 0 0 0 0 46 0 20 100 Total 0 8 16 7 3 0 0 0 0 46 0 20 100 M13 24th 6 Sullivan Base 6 341 6 15 94 19 93 16 0 8 120 122 840 Added 0 26 0 O 9 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Total 6 367 6 15 103 19 93 16 0 8 120 122 875 #14 16th & 3ullivan Base 30 820 3 17 233 68 180 8 11 1 10 72 1452 Adc~.~d 0 26 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Total 30 846 3 17 242 68 180 8 11 1 10 72 1488 #15 4th 6 Sullivan Base 29 1088 30 36 327 22 24 11 3 24 8 58 1660 Added 0 26 0 _ 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Total 29 1115 30 36 336 22 24 11 3 24 6 58 1696 Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng .s . . S R Fri Aug 16, 1995 09:50:36 Page 3-2 ' TURTI.E CREEK BUIZD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO NIITIGATZON ' . AM PEAK Volimr-e Northbound southbound Eastbound Westbound Tota1 ' Type Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Volmke • #15 3prague b 9u11ivan ' Baae 129 781 156 114 307 151 194 241 58 100 312 147 2689 Added 3 23 0 0 8 0 . 0 li 1 0 33 0 80 Tota1 132 804 156 114 315 151 194 252 59 100 345 147_ 2769 . ~ #22 3prague b Agpleway ' Baae 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 325 73 1 386 6 925 . Add,ed 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 30 0 45 •Total 117 1 3 2 1 7 5 329 BO 1 417 6 970 #2 5 TRENT 6 BARKER Base 59 0 30 0 0 0 0 199 57 64 873 0 1281 ` Add,ed 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 38 , Tota1 87 0 30 0 0 0 0 199 66 64 873 0 1318 #30 Hp►RKER/EB I-90 RAMP3 Base 0 355 9 47 103 0 83 1 24 0 0 0 623 Add,ed 0 73 18 7 22 0 9 0 21 0 0 0 .150 Tota1 0 428 27 54 125 0 93 1 45 0 0 0 773 #55 3prague b I,ong Baee 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 243 Added 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 Total 50 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 48 5 66 0 253 Traffix 3yatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . . ,.:,w, • Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 4-1 T[TRTLE CREEK BUI7jD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO I-IITIGATION AM PEAK Inpact Analysis Report Level Of Service Interaection Base Euture Change Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in Los veh c i.os veh c # 6 Bth b Barker A 1.2 0.000 B 1.9 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 7 3prague b Barker A 2.8 0.356 A 4.1 0.479 + 0.123 V/C • # 8 Appleway 6 Barker B 14.9 0.361 B 14.2 0.542 -0.729 D/V ; # 10 WB Raaps 6 Bazker C 2.1 0.000 C 2.6 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 22 3prague & Appleway D 3.5 0.000 E 4.1 0.000 + 0.000 V/C , # 30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMPS B 1.8 0.000 C 2.1 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 55 3prague 6 Long A 1.3 0.000 A 1.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Traffix 9yatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Ialand Pacific Eng • . ~.d ...[s~-1 ~t`^a Jr,.v-...- Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 5-1 Z'URTLE CREEK BUZLD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO IrIITIGATION . . AM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Etiiture Volie Alternative) . *~es**~,►*,r,r,►,~~~r*,r,r***,r,r*,►****,r,►*,~**,r,r***,r*~~:*~r*~****,r,~**,~~r*~*:**t,r,r*~*,r,r*,r***~*,r Intereection #6 8th 6 Barker *~tr:*~*,►*~r~~►**,►,~*,r*t*****,►*,r****~*f,rf*,►,t*,►~t,t~~*~**,t~,t,tr►*,t,r,r******t**+~*****,r***: Avgrag+e Delay (aec/veh) : 1.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: B ***,r,r******~,r*,r****t:,rf,r~**,►,t,t******,r,t***~**~****~tr**:~r*~**::*:*tf,~,r,►,rw****~e**~* Approach: North Bound South Bound Eaet Bound West Bound - Movement : I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L'- T - R II II II I ' Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 9top 3ign 8top 3ign - Righta: . Include Includ,e Include Includ,e Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0' 0 0 0 li 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 „ .------------I II I Voluine Mrodule : Base Vol: 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 Groovth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PaeserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 2 39 2 13 27 0 3 0 4 5 0 18 Added Vol: 0 62 0 7 22 12 53 0 0 0 0 19 Initial Eut: 2 101 2 20 49 12 56 0 4 5 0 37 Uaer A.dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 PHF. Voltme: 3 125 3 25 60 15 69 0 5 6 0 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Final Vol.: 3 125 3 25 60 15 69 0 5 6 0 45 Adj us ted Vol-inre Module : Grade: 0$ 0$ 0% 0$ $ Gycle/Caza : Xooc ~ocx x0ocx x~= >000c Xocx Mooc =Qtx $ Truck /Comb : 200QC xxxx 20oot Xocx ~ooot .1oooc 2oK3oc 2ooot PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 • -Cycl /Car PCE : 'xoo~c xxxx Xocx Xcxx xxoos 200oc XXooc Xoos TrcJc /Gmb PCE : JXooc xxxx xaooc >oooc 110ooc XXooc Ioooc XcQc Adj Vol.: 3 125 3 28 60 15 76 0 6 7 0 50 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3) : 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 2.1 xoooc xooooc 2.1 xooot xxoooc 3. 4xooos 2.6 3. 4xoooc 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xoQOC xaooot 5.0 xooot xooooc 6.5 xooc 5.5 6.5 xxxx 5.5 ------------I ---------------II II--------------- 11 Capacity Module: Cnf 1 i c t Vol : 7 5xoQS xoooflc 12 7xoooc xxaooc 2 4 4xoooc 6 B 2 2 4xoooc 126 Po tent Cap.: 15 7 8xoooc xoooxx 1491 xxxx xotxotx 765 xooc 1279 7 8 6xooot 1196 Adj Cap: 1.00 xoooc xoQOCC 1.00 xxxx xooooc 0.94 xxxx 1.00 0.98 xxxx 1.00 , Move C ap 15 7 8xoooc xooooc 1491 xooot xxtxx 721 xxxx 1279 7 6 9xoooc 1196 ------------I 11 ---------------II I I►evel Of 8ervice Module : Stoppeci Del: 2.3 xxxx xoocxs 2.5 xooQC xoQOOS 5.5 xooc 2.8 4.7 xoooc 3.1 L09 by Mov+e : A * * p, * * * * * ~ * Moveaent : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xoooc xoooc xoococ xxxx xooQC xoocxc xoooc 743 xoocxc xoooc 1119 xooooc shrd 3tpDel:xoocxs xoooc -ooooc xooKxc xocxoc x~oooc xooot 5.4 xooocx xoQOOC 3.4 xxooc 9hared L03: * * ,r * w * * B rt * A * ApproachDel: 0.0 0.7 5.3 3.3 Traffix syatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ . _ Fri Aug IB, 1995 09:50:36 Page 6-1 ~ -_--__-_---------___----_----_--_R------_------------__--------r,--_r-r--------- ~ T"[TR= CREEI{ Ht7IT+b OU'I' WITFi P'EtOJECT, NO t*IITIGATIDN AM PEAK I,evel Of Senrice com.putaLion Report 1994 HCM 4-y+iay 3top method (Fatuse Voli Alternative) ~,r~~r*~r~r*r~r**~**~~:#~r*~r,r,r~tttf~~~**~~~~+~t~~**~~~*~r*~,r****~~,e*,r~~f:~*~*~,~~rt~f*f**t ' Irxteraection #7 Sprague & Harkqar ~ Gycle (sec): I Criticaa Yo1./Cag. (X) : 0.479 Losa Time (see) : 6 Average Delay- (seclveh) : 4.1 - 4pti.ma1 GycYe: 4 i,evel Df service: 'A Approach: North Souiz[l South Bovnd Ea9t Bovnd Weat Housld Movement: L - "r R L - T - R L - 'ln - R L - T - R -.._fi----------- ~ . Control: Stap sign stap BigrY 9top 3iqn Stap 53gn Rights : Irxclatde Include Include IrYclude - Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 lx 0 0 4 D ir 0 0 - ~ ~ E __rr----------- E volu~e Madule : ' $ase VoI: 23 95 6 31 39 10 13 24 12 B 48 109 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1,03 1.03 1,03 1.43 PasserHyVol: 0 0 0 4 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Initial Bae: 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 B 49 111 Addeci Vo1 : 0 134 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial E~at: 24 232 6 11 Bl 10 13 25 1-2 a 49 111 User Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ PHF Adj: 0.89 4.88 0.$$ 0.88 0.68 0.89 0f98 0.8$ 0.96 0.98 0.89 0.88 ~ PHF VoYti27 254 7 13 93 12 15 29 14 9 56 127 - Reduct 4►al: 0. 0 D d 0 0 Q 0 0 fl 0 0 Reduced Val; 27 254 7 13 93 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 P(;E Aaj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.❑v 1.00 1.00 *4.F Aaj: _ 1.00 1_00 1.00 _1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 27 264 7 13 93 12 15 28 34 9 56 127 j 11 R_--- ~ ISatvration Flow Modul$: SatlLarre: 801 801 807. 710 710 710 488 488 488 401 401 401 Adjustare.nt: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00° 1.00 1.04 1.00 Lanes. 0.09 0.99 0.02 0.11 0.79 0.10 0.25 0.49 0.25 0.05 0.29 0.66 - Firiai Sat.: 73 710 19 78 550 72 128 240 120 19 117 265 , ------------I ____-____r,.-r_____--------=----i~--------------- capa=-ty Analysms t+lodule: vol/sat; 0.37 0.37 0,37 0.17 0.17 0.17 4.12 0.12 0.12 0,49 0.48 0.48 ~ Crit Moves: rr*,r* ~#~~r ~r*** I I ~ ~ ~ ' Iieve1 Of serriae Madu1e: . . DelayJVeh: 4.1 4.1 4.1 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.6 6.2 6.2 6.2 belay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.44 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 AdjT3elfVeh: 4.1 4.1 4.1 1.9 3.9 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.6 6.2 6.2 6.2 J Los by Move: A A A A A A A. A A B B B ***!r#*ir#~*i#f~fi~f~ir#~~u~~e~sE~~*~ir*~~**f1e~*~elr**4#***#t~,rir~ir*4*it~~r~r*irf*fkk#4*i*sr**1r ' Traffix System Versios 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacz.fic Er►g ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 7-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO MITIGATION • AM PEAK Lev+el Of 3ervice Camputation Report ' 1994 HCM Operations Method (Fliture Volie Alternative) ,r~r*~,r~***w*w***:*,t****,r**rt**tr*:,r*~r,►~e***t****::*w~w,r**+t**~*,►,r*tr****~e~*~r,►*,r~**,t*t~ Intersection #8 ApplQway b Barker *,r*~**********,►**,~tr***~*,rw*~*****f,►*t,t*,rr+t**,t,►*tf~*,►,r*,t****:**~e***ft*******,►~*** Gycle (eec) : 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.542 ' Loss Time (aec) : 12 (Y+R ~ 4 aec) Av+erage Delay (eec/veh) : 14.2 Optimal Gycle : 43 Level Of 3ervice : " B **,►*****,t,t*,t*******:*f*~*~llrr,t**,r*:*ltrt**,r~~~e,►~:*t*!*tt*w,►***t,t*,t,t****1t~rr,t,trt,ttr***,t Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Weat Bound . Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected . Rights: Includ,e Include Include • Include Min. Green: 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I,anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I ---------------11 Voliuae Module : ` Base Vol: 44 168 22 5 49' 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 45 173 23 5 50 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 Added Vol: 24 86 24 7 30 7 2 0 2 9 0 2 Initial E1it: 69 259 47 12 81 113 58 215 14 31 147 5 .User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - PHF Adj: 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 PHF Volimee: 89 333 60 15 104 145 74 277 18 40 189 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 89 333 60 15 104 145 74 277 18 40 189 7 ~ PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2rII.F Ad:): 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 ' Final Vol.: 89 333 60 15 104 145 74 291 19 40 199 7 ------------1 ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Saturation Flow M+odule: 3at/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 " Adjustment: 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.18 0.70 0.12 0.06 0.39 0.55 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.93 0.07 ; Final 9at.: 244 913 164 79 547 762 1805 3531 231 1805 3671 129 ~ ------------I , Capacity Analyeis Module: Vol/3at: 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.05 0.05 ~ Crit Moves: , i Green/Gycle: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.08 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.11 0.11 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.49 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.49 0.49 ------------I I,evel Of 9ervice Module ~ Delay/Veh: 5.4 5.4 5.4 3.9 3.9 3.9 27.6 23.6 23.6 33.1 25.1 25.1 i User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 5.4 5.4 5.4 3.9 3.9 3.9 27.6 23.6 23.6 33.1 25.1 25.1 Queue : 1 4 1 0 1 1 2 7 1 1 5 0 ****~:*,r*~*,►***:~s,t***tr:,~:f~r~r*~~t**r*,~*****,t::~►:*~rt****~::**~~******,►*:**~r****,r* Traffix syatem Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng 1 l Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 8-1 TURTLE CREEK BUIZ,D OUT WITH PROJECT, NO NIITIGATION AM PEAK - Lev+el Of Service Detailed Camputation Report 1994 HcM Operations Method . Euture Volime Alternative - **,rt,t,t**~t,r*,►**,t,t**,r,►*,t*ttt***~r*,►*w,t:tt*,r,r*tr,r::***t*,t****t*~~,t,rte*t►***~**t******* • • Intersection #8 Appleway 6 Barker ***t*,t:,r*~r*******+r*:f*t,r~,►t*~:,►:****sf*,t,tt,~,t*~f*t,►t~**r****t*,r,r*,r*****,t~t*:f,r*:** Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound Eaat Bound West Bound - Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T"- R 11 . HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 , Lane Group : I,TR I,TR I,TA LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT • • #Ians InGrps : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops Input 3aturation Adj Module: I,ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0$ 0$ 0% 0$ Parking/Hr: - No No No No Bus 3tp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 EacclusiveRT : Include Include Include Include $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - 11 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Caae Module: f(rt) Case : 7 7 7 7 7 7 xcoQC 5 5 xxorx 5 5 f(lt) Case: 5 5 5 5 5 5 1xxxc xoooc 1xcooc xxooc ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops Saturation Adj Mrodule: ' Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xosaoc 1.00 1.00 xococ 1.00 1.00 Hus 3tp Adj : 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoooc 1.00 1.00 •xooot 1.00 1.00 Area P,dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 , , RT Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.83 xooc 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj : 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.95 xoooc xoosxx 0.95 xooQC xoooot HCM 3at Adj: 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 . Var Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IrII,.F 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 E'nil. Sat Adj: 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Del ay Adj us baent Factor Module : Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3ignal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 *t►****:~~*ftff+r****,rr►*ff,rt*t*~r~~*,r***********::*t,t~~rw****~~r:~w**:****r*s*r*s~~** Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . - . _ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 8-2 TURTLE CREE K BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO NIITIGATIC3N AM FEAK . Level Of service Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat Adj) ~ 1994 HCM Operationa Method ' Future Voltan~e Alternativ+e . 1r**!r***~►A1r*~k1r*!**At#t*t**t!*~***1t!**frf*t*~k***4~~!**A*f~►t1~!**~**ltirlr~~!*~*tk*irf**~l~elr • - Intersection #8 Appleway b Barker r~e#,~*:t,►~~*:,►*:*t*,r*~tw~r*~f~*:~**,►trtr*~*,r****t,►ss~~****~:******:,r~r!*~t~*~**+~*+~*,►*,r i . Approach: - North South East Weat Gycle Length, C: 90 • 90 xxooooc 'xooQOOC : Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 60.68 60.68 Xooosxx >ooooot ~ Effectiv+e Green Ti.me Per Lane Group, g: 60.68 60.68 Xaooooc ~oooQOC ~ Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 60.68 60.69 xaoocQC )oooooc Number Of Oppoaing Lanea, No: 1 1 xocxoooc X)MOooc ~ NtmDber Of Lanea In Laae Group, N: 1 1 xootxos Xoooos • Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: ' 89 15 xasxxoc 2ooootx i Proportion of Left Turne in Lane Group, Plt: 0.18 0.06 xoooooc XXX300C Proportion of Left Turna in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.06 0.18 xooooQC Iloooooc. , Left Turna Fer Cycle, LTC: 2.23 0.38 xooxxooc >oooooc ~ Adjueted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 264 482 xxooooc 'XXXXXX ! . Opposing Flow Per I►ane Per Cycle, Volc: 6.60 12.05 xoonooc ~oooooc ' Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xooooos Xoooot Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xoooooc XDooooc Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf : 10.63 34.15 xcooQS xXXoX ' Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.33 0.33 xoooooc Xoooooc Eff grn blocked by oppoaing queue, gq: 2.33 6.02 xxoootx >c)oQOQc E ff grn whi le lef t turns f i 1 ter thru, gu : 50 . 05 26.53 xooQOCC aoooooc Max opposing cars arriviaq during gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxxxoc IIDCXc= Proportion of Opposing Thru 6 RT cara, ptho: 0.94 0.82 xxcoox .10ooooc Left-turn Saturatioa Factor, fa: ,.cx3oooc Xooocx XXoooc 30ooooc Proportion of Left Turna in 3hared Lane, pl: Xooootx ~ooooc XXQOOOC xXooooc Through-car Equivalenta, ell: 2.94 7.17 xoooooc -xxxaooc • 9ingle Lane Throug3z-car Equivalenta, e12: 0.00 0.00 xoooooc ~oootx Minimum Left Turn Adjuatment Factor, fmin: 0.04 0.03 xococcx ~oooooc SinglQ Lane Left Turn Adjus tment P'actor, , fm: 0.79 0.88 xxooooc Xoooooc ' Lef t Turn Adj u9 tment Factor, f 1 t: 0.79 0.88 xooootx 20ooooc r*rt~****+r,r*****f*wst****~r►*,►**t*~rt#~~r~t*********,t*~~t~t****r►~*,r:*r,r**,r:t*w*w*t**t~ - Traffix 9yatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 9-1 TUATLE CREEK BUIIZ) OUT WITH PROJECT, NO MITIGATION AM PEAK Level Of Service Coaputation Report - 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Volume Alternativ+e) ,►*******,►*,►~t,t*w**,►i***~***,r~**~w****,►~~,►,r****~rs**t~*:stwtw***+r*tf*~*,►*,r**,►****** Intersection #10 WB Ramps 6 Barker ' ***#:*+r*:***+r,►*****~r**,r,r,►**:***********f*~*~*~*,►,~,►~►*,r**~,►,t~***,t*,►**~~t*~,riw*,r~:,r Av+erage Delay (aec/veh) : 2.6 Worat Caee Level Of Service: C *,r**~r~*+►rrwt*~******~***~~*,►~r,t,t*********,r,r*,~*~r,rt~:~**~t****+t*~tt*t~wr!******~►*** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movwsnent : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ' ------------I 11 ---------------11 . Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 3top sign Rights: Includ,e Includ,e Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I . Vol-inre Module : Base Vol: 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 B . Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PaeserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 179 149 59 20 143 186 8 16 6 23 25 B Added Vol: 60 22 0 0 23 26 2 0 6 0 0 0 Initial EUt: 239 171 59 20 166 213 11 16 12 23 25 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volie: 265 190 65 22 184 236 12 18 14 25 27 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Final Vol.: 265 190 65 22 184 236 12 18 14 25 27 9 Adjusted Volie Mpdule: Grad,e: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : 30ocx .10oQC . 3X30QC -10ocx Xoooc Xoooc X)= aoocc % Truck/Comb: x0ocx ICooc ~c~oc Xoooc 310oQt 20ocx Mooc Xoooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl /Car PCE : 3103oc "Qos >oooc 2otXos >oooc Xo= 20= .1oaoc . - Trck/Cmb PCE : 2ooQC Xaoc >oooc 3ooot 3oooc .10ooc xmooc 3oooc. Adj Vol.: 292 190 65 24 184 236 13 20 15 28 30 10 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/8): 30 MPH « . Mov+eUp Time : 2.1 xxxx 3xooc 2.1 xooot xocooc 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xotxxot 5.0 xoot xxooc 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 ------------I 11 ---------------11 Capacity Mcdule: Cnflict Vol: 420 xoooc xxoooc 255 xoooc xooooc 830 844 302 827 929 222 Potent Cap.: 1082 xoooc xooocx 1296 xoooc xooaot 350 394 974 351 355 1068 Adj Cap: 1.00 xoooc xoocxc 1.00 xxxx xocxxc 0.67 0.67 1.00 0.69 0.67 1.00 Mrove Cap.: 1082 xoooc xooooc 1296 xoooc xooooc 233 262 974 242 236 1068 ------------I 11 ---------------11 ~ Level Of 3ervice Module: Stoppeci Del: 4.4 xxxx xooooc 2.8 xoaQC Xooooc 16.2 14.8 3.8 16.6 17.2 3.4 L03 by Move: A * * A Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT 3hared Cap. : xoooc xxxx 3ooooc xoooc xxxx xaoQCx xoooc 327 xooQC xoooc 270 moooc 3hrd 3tpDel:moooc xooot moooc xooooc xoooc Nooooc >ooQOt 12.7 mococ moooc 17.3 moooc 3hared L03: * ~ * * * * * C * * C * ApproachDel: 2.4 0.2 11.7 14.9 Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I.iceased to Inlaad Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 10-1 TURTLE CREEK ~ BUILD OUT WITH PAOJECT, NO MITIGATION AM PEAK • Lev+el Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Voliaae Alternativ+e) ****,t*******tr***,tir,t*,t****tr**t**********,t**#*t~rtr*~tw~~,t:***,tt,t***tr**,t***,t*w~t~~t,tf Intersection #22 3prague 6 Appleway - ,r,r*t*****~~*~tr,r********~***f*,►t:~*tf***~*****:**rr:t,r***t*f****+r,r***~,r,r~*~~*,►*,rrrre ' Av+erage Delay ( aec/vah) : 4.1 Wors t Case I,evel Of 3ervice : E ~ ,r,r:~~*:,r*,t**~,rt:**,►,►**:t,r*tr**t,t~r,t*wt*~#*:t~r**~*t+►~t****,r***~,r*,t***::,t,trt*r►*~*~*~r,t • Approach: Nozth Bouad South Bound East Bound West Bound M.ov*ment : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R ~ i - Control: Stop 9ign 3top Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights : Includ,e Includ,e Include Include Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I ~ Voltm~ Module : Base Vol: 111 1 3 2 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ~ PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 114 1 3 2 1 7. 5 325 73 1 386 6 Added vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 30 0 Ini tial Eut: 117 1 3 2 1 7 5 329 80 1 417 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ` PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 ' PHF Volie: 139 1 4- 2 1 9 6 391 95 1 494 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -s Final Vol.: 139 1 4 2 1 9 6 391 95 1 494 7 Adjusted Volisae Module: ' Grade: 0$ 0% 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : XKXc =00s .10ooc X)oos I'oooc >0QC x~oQC 20ooc $ Truck /Comb : >oooc 2ocXc ,.Doas "ooo{ Noocx No= Xooc Xooc - PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl/Car PCE : .10oos .100oc x0ooc 2CcXt Xtxx XKXoc 2o3tx >ooQc Trck/Cmb PCE : )0ooc 2cooc xxxx xooc • 3oaQC >ooos >oQOC x)= , Adj Vol.: 153 1 4 3 1 9 7 391 95 1 494 7 Critical Gap Mndule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « • MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.1 xooc xooQOt 2.1 xxxx xoooQc Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 7.0 6.5 5.5 5.5 xoooc xoooot 5.5 xxxx xooocx ------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 944 947 243 898 991 251 502 xoQC xoocxc 485 xoooi xooooc Potent Cap.: 264 305 1043 282 287 1033 922 xoooc xtxotx 941 xxxx xaooot Adj Cap : 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 xoooc xooooc 1.00 xooQC xooocx Move Cap.: 258 301 1043 277 284 1033 922 xooooc 941 xxxx xooooc ------------I II I I,evel Of 3ervice Module: 9topped Del: 30.0 12.0 3.5 13.1 12.7 3.5 3.9 xooot xootxoc 3.8 xoooc xootxx L03 by MAVe: E * * * * * p, * t p, * * Movement: LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap.: xoooc xxxx 645 xoooc 571 >ooooc .oooc 110oac lloooot %oooc Xo= ~oo~oc 9hrd StpDel : xoccoc xoooc 5.6 xoocxc 6.4 xxoooc xooooc xxxx xxcooc xooooc xxxx xxoa Shared I,09: g * g + ~ * * * * * ApproachDel: 29.2 6.4 0.1 0.0 Traffix Syetem Version 6.6 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eag Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 11-1 Z*CTRTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT, NO MITIGATION AM PEAK Level Of Senrice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) **~***~**~r,r~****tr*t~**tr~*,t***~*,r,►**:*f*,►w,r,r***~:~r,r~,t*,r*,r***,r*:,~*,~**,r~**~r******~* Intersection #30 SARKER/EB I-90 RAMPS ****~rr~***,r*s*r*~**~e,►:*w**w,rf,►f,►****,r**rw**,t**+r*t,r:ww,►:**~*:~*,r***t:*::***,►,rw*w* Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.1 Worst Case Level Of 3ervice: C *~,r**,t**~**+~***t~r*~******,t~,►*,e,r**,►,►+raw*******.ttr*tr,r**,►*s~***f~,r**~~+~:rrt,~rr,t*,►**~~* Appzoach: North Hound 3outh Bound Eaat Bound West Bound : Mrovement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop 9ign 3top 3ign Rights: Include Include Include Includ,e • I,anes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1_ 0 0 0 0 0 . , • Vollmse Module : Base Vol: 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 Groovth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 0 355 9 47 103 0 83 1 24 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 73 18 7 22 0 9 0 21 0 0 0 Initial F1it: 0 428 27 54 125 0 93 1 45 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF A,dj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Voltmke: 0 472 30 60 138 0 102 1 49 0 0 0 i Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 472 30 60 138 0 102 1 49 0 0 0 Adj us ted Voli,e Module : Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gyicle/Cars : 110= 31oooc Mocx XXooc No= Xoot ?°Q°t XKX°C $ Truc]c /Comb : >0oac >ooQt Xoooc )oooc Xooc )ooQC )ooot 31otxx PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 , Gycl/Car PCE : XxQOC xxxx xOooc 31ooQC 31ooQC 2oooc -CK3QC xCoQc Trck/Cmb PCE : xx= 3oooc .1oooc 30ooc 30ooc 310ooc 3ooQC 20noc Adj vol.: 0 472 30 65 138 0 112 1 54 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/9): 30 NPH « _ MoveVp Time : xoooc xotxot xooQC 2.1 xooQC xotxooc 3.4 3.3 2.6 xoooQS xxxx xxQOOc Critical Gp:xoooxc xxxx xoaoc 5.0 xoooc xooocx' 6.5 6.0 5.5 xooooc xxxx xoooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Mrodule: Cnf l i c t Vo l: xoooc xxxx xoooos 5 0 2xxxc xooooc 684 699 138 3ooos xxxx xoooot Potent Cap.: xooos xxxx -ooooc 969 xooc xootxc 425 469 1179 xxxx xxxx xxoooc Adj Cap: xoooc xx= xooooc 1.00 xoQC xoQOOC 0.93 0.93 1.00 axoooc =QC xooooc M,ove Cap. : Xoooc Xoos Xooooc 989 xocxoc xoaoos 394 435 1179 xoooc xoaos xxootx , ------------I 11 , Level Of 3ervice module : stopped Del:xxoooc xxxx xxxxQC 3.9 xoooc xooooc 12.3 8.3 3.2 xootxx xoooc xxoooc , IAS by Move : * * * A * * * * A w * M,ovement : LT - LZR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - L'IR - RT shared Cap. : xooos xoooc xxocxc xxxx xoooc xoocxx 3 95 xxxx xoococ xoooc xoooc =ooc 9hrd s tpDel : xooooc xooc xooooc )ooooc xxxx aooooc 12.3 xoooc xoooc xooooz xoooc xooooc 3hazed L03: * + • * ~ C ApproachDel: 0.0 1.2 9.3 0.0 Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng r{• . _ . '.ib . . t Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:50:36 Page 12-1 TURTLE CREEK BUIZ+D OUT WITEI PROJECT, NO NZTIGATION ' • _ AM PEAK Lev+el Of Service Coaputation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Voltaae Alternative) ~t,►***,►*rr**~***********~:*!***~*:*t*,r,r*,r~****~~****t**,r,r**f*,r,r,r*t*,r*,r,r,t**:***,r+r~t Interaection #55 3prague b Zong ,►~**~***,r**~:*~rw***~*,t,►*,r**w~****.~~t,t*~,t*~,r*,r~***,~,r***~w,r*~*~**~rr***,►:,rs*~r***~~tr Average Delay (sec/ve.h) : 1.3 Worst Case Ievel Of Service: A . ' ~**#lrlr***~*ttlrt**tt**fl~r*~t1t~**~*fr**~~tt**!~!~►*~t**~t**4fAit*t~►!**tr*!*tt*Ait*ftt*~*1r1e* Approach: North Bound south Bound East Bound West Bound - Mcv+ement : I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: 9top 3ign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Righte: Include Include Include . Includ,e Lanes: ' 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ------------I Volume Module: - Base Vol: 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 . Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 , PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : Initial Bse: 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 Ar.ided Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 Initial E1at: 50 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 48 5 66 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volt~r~ : 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 52 6 72 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 55 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 52 6 72 0 _ Adj us ted Volime Module : Grad,e: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ % Cycle/cars : Xoos xMcx >oooc >oocx XMoc Xcooc xMoc XXoos ' $ Truck/Comb: Xooc 3"o= X~oot ~oocx xCNos XXooc XKXs x0oot PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PCE : -ooot "ootx ~oooc .1oQtx >oooc >oocx '10taoc aoooc Trck/Cmb PCE : "-oQOC Xotx XXXX Ioooc IooQC xXoQC '10oot Ioooc Adj Vol.: 61 0 27 0 0 0 0 67 52 6 72 0 Critical Gap M,Qdule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 xoooc 2.6 ,ooooc xoooc xooooc =sxx xoooc x=QOC 2.1 xoooc xooosx Critical Gp: 6.5 xxxx 5.5 =ooc xoooc xooocx xoooc xxxx xoo= 5.0 xxxx xooooc ------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 171 xoooc 93 xoooc xoooc xooooc xooQC xxxx xxoooc 119 xoooc xxxoc Po tent C ap 'A 4 3xxooc 1243 xooc xooot xxoot xooac xooc aooooc 15 0 4xoooc xoooac Adj Cap : 1.00 xoooc 1.00 xooot xxxx xooooc xooc xxxx xoogoc 1.00 xxxx xxxooc Mov+e Cap. : 840 xxxx 1243 xocc xoooc xoooc xooc xoooc xooooc 1504 xoooc xxxcx ------------I Lev+el Of 3ervice Module : stopped Del : 4. 6xoooc 3. 0xxooQC xxxx xoxxc xooaoc xoooc xcooc 2.4 xxxx xxooa I,03 by Mov+e : * * * * * * * * A tr M,ovement : LT - LTR - RT I.T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT 3hared Cap.: x)ooc 934 xooooc xoooc xoooc xxoooc xcooc xoooc aooooc xoocc xcooc xoooc 3hrd 3 tpDel : xcoQOC 4.2 xoooos xoooQC xxxx xoooQC xooQOC xxxx xxxQC xooooc xooc xcoooc 3hared L03: * A * * t * * * ~ * * ApprcachDel: 4.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 Traffix 3yatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceneed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:14 Page 1-1 TURTLE CREEK BUII,D OUT WITH PROJECT PM PE.AK Trip Generation Report PM PEAK Forecast for Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Tota1 $ Of • # Subzone Amount Units In Out In Out Trips Tota1 1 M0M13NG3mE 120.00 3FDU 0.66 0.36 79 43 122 28.9 • Zone 1 3ubtotal 79 43 122 28.9 3 MEADUWVIEW T 40.00 9FflU 0.66 0.36 26 14 40 9.5 Zone 3 3ubtotal 26 14 40 9.5 4 R.IVERVU,LK 120 . 00 3EDU 0.66 0.35 79 42 121 28.7 Zone 4 3ubtotal 79 42 121 28.7 5 TLTRTLE CREEK 101.00 3FDU 0.66 0.36 67 36 103 24.4 Zone 5 3ubtotal 67 36 103 24.4 6 MEADOWV3:EW R 35.00 3EflU 0.66 0.36 23 13 36 8.5 Zone 6 3ubtotal 23 13 36 8.5 - TOTAL 274 148 422 100.0 t Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:16 Page 2-1 TURTLE CREEK ; BUII+D OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Trip Distribution Report + . ~ Percent Of Trips ° To Gates d 2 3 6 7 8 9 11 12 ~ ~ 2one - . _ j - 1 0.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 10.0 25.0 ~ , 3 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 ~ 4 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40.0 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 45.0 , 6 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 ~ . ~ I • o Traffix 8ystem Version 5.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:16 Page 3-1 TUFtTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Turning Movement Report Volume Northbound 9outhbound Easthound Westbound Total Z'ype Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right I,eft Thru Right Volimme #2 3altese 6 3ullivan . . Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 Added 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 49 Total 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 49 ' #6 8th & Bazker . Base 1 33 5 25 59 . 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 148 Added 0 40 0 23 73 43 34 0 0 0 0 13 226 ' Tota1 1 73 5 48 132 45 34 1 0 7 0 28 374 t17 Sprague 6 Barker Base 12 45 5 76 88 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 442 Added 0 87 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 226 Total 12 132 5 76 227 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 668 MB Appleway b Barker Base 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 1321 Added 15 56 16 4 103 4 8 0 7 29 0 8 250 - Total 40 163 37 12 251 180 150 310 29 49 334 15 1571 #10 WB Raups & Barker Base 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 991 Added 39 53 0 0 22 17 8 0 21 0 0 0 160 Total 132 402 20 12 283 134 50 9 28 27 31 23 1151 #11 Misaion & Bazker Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ad,d,ed 0 5 55 24 10 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 136 Total 0 5 55 24 10 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 136 1l13 24 th b 3ullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ad,ded 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 O O 49 Total 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 #14 16th & sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Total 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 #15 4th b Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 To tal 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Traffix Syatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:16 Page 3-2 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WZTH PROJECT - PM PEAK Volume Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Tota1 Type Left ZYhru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Volu~e ' #16 3prague & Sullivan ' Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Added 2 15 0 0 28 0 0 40 4 0 21 . 0 110 ' Total 2 15 0 0 28 0 0 40 4 0 21 0- 110 ' . #22 3prague 6 Appleway , Base 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 1387 - Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 24 0 19 0 61 • Total 90 1 4 0 0 13 6 552 197 3 579 6 1448 • #25 TRENT 6 SARKER Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Added 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 51 ; . Tota1 1B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 0 51 I #30 BARKER/EB I-90 R-AMPS Base 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 1020 A,dded 0 60 12 4 39 0 32 0 72 0 0 0 219 Total 0 362 48 73 254 0 267 1 235 0 0 0 1239 #55 Sprague & Long ~ Base 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 13r. 16 8 84 0 269 Added 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 26 Total 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 41 8 84 0 295 Traffix 3ysteai Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng • ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 4-1 TURTI.E CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Impact Analysis Report Lev+el Of service Intersection Baee Euture Change ael/ V/ Del/ V/ in i,os veh c i,os veh c ~i 6 8th & Barker A 1.0 0.000 B 1.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 7 Sprague b Barker A 2.7 0.309 A 4.0 0.438 + 0.129 V/C ~I 8 Appleway ~ Barker C 16.4 0.464 C 16.1 0.558 -0.304 D/V # 10 WB Raatps ~ Bazker C 2.4 0.000 D 3.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ' # 22 3prague b Appleway F 5.5 0.000 F 7.2 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMPS D 5.9. 0.000 F 11.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~i 55 3prague 6 I,ong A 0.5 0.000 A 0.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ Traffix Systeai Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ '.b. - i.. . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Pag+e 5-1 T[JRTI.E CREE K BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK I,evel Of 3ervice Coiaputation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Vol- Alternative) ~wtrt,t**rr~t*,twtr*,t~,t,r:~r,t~rt****~t,►~:,~*:**tww**~r~*~e*tr*~e**tr*,t***tt+t~ttwt~,rttrw*,t,ttr***** Interaection #6 8th & Barker ~rr►,rtr*,r~►*,~~r***t**~►~:w,►,t,t***~,►~****~**,►~r*~***~***~~~►*+~,►*****#,►r~►*rr*tr,t*+~**,►,►,►****,r~ Average Delay (aec/veh) : 1.0 Worst Case I,evel Of 3errrice: A ***~*~r**~+r***,rt►*****t►*,r,t*~*~►*~*~*~*tr***~***:t*t~**,►***rr*****~*,t,►****,►,~,►*w*:***,r* Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound East Bound West g'ound ~ Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~ . ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 , Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top Sign 3top 3ign 'Rights : Include Includ,e Include Includ,e ~ I,anea. 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Y ------------I i • Volwae Module : ~ Base Vol: 1 32 5 24 57 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03* 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Ueer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ PHF Adj: 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 PAF Volirma: 1 40 6 30 72 3 0 1 0 9 0 19 , Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 40 6 30 72 3 0 1 0 9 0 19 1l--------------- 11 ---------------11 Adjus ted Voliae Module : Grad,e: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Cycle/Cars : xX)tx XocXoc 2ocxs 1=2cx Xooc 3C1ooc XXcXoc 30cxx $ Truck/Ccaab: 2o= xIooc Noooc xx= Xooc >0ooc xxOot xXcoc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car FCE : >otxx xCas >oooc Msxx ,<Xocx xxoQC 20oos xx= Trck/Cmb PCE : 2ocXos xxxx >ooQC soooc >oooc ~cQOC 3oQOC xCoc Adj Vol.: 1 40 6 33 72 3 0 1 0 10 0 21 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 MPH « ' MoveUp Tim,e : 2.1 xxxx xoooQt 2 .1 X)ooc xooooc xooooc 3. 3 xxoo= 3.4 xoQC 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xoooxc 5.0 xxxx xocQOC xocQOC 6.0 xcQCC 6.5 xoooc 5.5 il II I Capacity Module: ' Cnf 1 i c t Vo l: 7 4xxxc 2oooQC 4 7xotxcc xooooc xoooc 151 xoooc 14 9xoooc 43 Poteat Cap.: 1580 xooQC xcQOxc 1629 xxxx xoooos xxxx 909 xxxoc 869 x>ooc 1316 Adj Cap : 1.00 xooc xaotxx 1. 00 Xoooc Xooooc xxxx 0. 98 xoosxx 0.98 xxxx 1.00 Move Cap.: 1580 xoo= 162 9xooQC xooQC xxxx 8 8 9xxxQC 853 xxxx 1316 ------------I 11 ---------------I . Lev+el Of Service Module: Stoprped Del: 2.3 xoooc xoootx 2.3 XooQC xooooc xooooc 4.1 xooooc 4.3 xxxx 2.8 L03 by Move : A • * A p, t * * * blovement : LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : 20ooc xxxx 20000c xx= Xoooc Iooooc ~oc~cc xooc =aooc xxxx 1122 xotxx ehrd 3 tpDel : =ooc 20oc ~ooQ~ ~coooc ~oocc ~oooQC ~ooQOC mOOC ~ooooc )oooos 3. 3 xoooQc Saared L09: * • * * * * * * * * A * ApproachDel: 0.1 0.7 4.1 3.2 Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I.icenaed to Znland Pacific Eng . ~ l . • ~ . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 6-1 TURTLE CREEK BUII,D OUT WITH PROJECT PM PF.7►IC , Level Of 9ervice Camputation .Rsport 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volvme Alternativ+e) ****~t*~*t!**,t*~►irtr*****~*!t****1t**t,r*****tr:*lr,t,t*~***,t,t*~***!~***,t+t**t*1rw,t*,t**~**tr~~rx Interaection #6 8th 6 Barker • **~r:,►~~►,t*~*,t*,t,t~r*w,tt,►*:****,rw*************,rt~,►:~***rr***tr***tr,r,t****t►rr,trt*~,t~***+t~: Av+erage Delay ( sec/veh) : 1.3 Wors t Case I,evel Of 3ervice : B *~**,t,r~w*,rtr*,t*,r****~:*~*~t*re,t~tr*~t,r***,r**~r,r***,rf*::*:***,►,r*~t*~r*~,►****~****w~t*,►**~r Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Hound Weat Bound Movearent : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 3top 3ign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ' ---------------I : Volume Module: Hase Vol: 1 32 • 5 24 57 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 • Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Initial Bse: 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Added Vol: 0 40 0 23 73 43 34 0 0 0 0 13 Initial Eut: 1 73 5 48 132 45 34 1 0 7 0 28 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 PHF Volume: 1 89 6 58 161 55 42 1 0 9 0 35 - R,educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 1 89 6 58 161 55 42 1 0 9 0 35 Adjusted Voltmoe module: Grade: 0$ 0$ - 0$ 0$ $ Gycl e/ C ar a: xxxx xooc xxxoc 30otx 30= aNooxx xK3sx >oooc $ Truck/Comb: XoQC 200oc XQOC Xc~ot NMcc XooCc xx~oc Xo= :PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE: >0= >oQCx XOct >ocXc >CKXoc >otxx Xonc =cx Trck/Gmb PCE : 21oocx 30= Xocx 20ooc xxxx Xoonc Xooc 200Oc Adj Vol.: 1 89 6 64 161 55 46 1 0 10 0 38 Critical Gap Mrodule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 NPH « MroveUp Time : 2.1 xxxx xxoxx 2.1 xooot xooooc 3.4 3. 3xxoaQC 3. 4xococ 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xoooc xoocxx 5.0 xxxx xxxoc 6.5 6.0 xooQC 6.5 xoQC 5.5 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity MAdule: Cnf l i c t Vo 1: 216 xoooc xooxxc 95 xccoc )oocxx 358 3 4 4xoooc 341 xoos 92 Potent Cap.: 1352 xooQC xcacoc 1544 xoooc xxxoc 657 720 xooooc 672 xoooc 1244 Adj Cap: 1.00 xxxx xooooc 1.00 xxxx xoQOOC 0.93 0.95 xcoooc 0.96 xxxx 1.00 Move Cap. : 1352 xxxx xxoQt 1544 xxxx xoooot 613 665 xxxxoc 646 xoooc 1244 ------------I ---------------11 11 - Level Of 3ervice M,odule : 3 topped Del : 2. 7xoooc xooQac 2.4 xxxx xoQtxc 6.3 5. 3xooooc 5. 7xoooc 3.0 L09 by Move: A A * * * * * * * * Mov+ement : I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT 3hared Cap. : xxxx xooc >ooooc xoooc xcncc xocooi 615 xxxx xoQCOC xococ 1048 xooQc 9hrd 9tpDe1: >ooooc xoooc x~oooc xoQOCx xoooc xoooQC 6.3 xoQOC xooQOC xoxooc 3.6 xoxot 3hared L03: * * * * * * B A * ApproachDel: 0.0 0.6 6.3 3.5 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . . - t• ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 7-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT - PM PEAK Level Of 9ervice Camputation Report . 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Base Voluaee Alternative) e *~e****,~:*w**t******+~w*,t*,r*,r,t,r,t,t,►,r,r~*,r***:***~***,►**tr~e*~*********:,r,►***~**x~*,~,►,t,► Intersection #7 3prague 6 Bazker ' . ,r*,t*,r*,►*********~**~**~►*****~,t~*,r******,t********,t,t*,rw*,r*****rr,t***~*******,~**w*** Gycle (sec): 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.309 Losa Ti- (sec) : 6 Av+erage Delay (8ec/veh) : 2.7 . Optimal Gycle: 0 I,ev+e1 Of 8ervice: A ' ' w,►,t,t*t*~►*~****~***~*~~***,r,►~*~,►,t,►*~r,r****,r~►stsr*a~~a~atr~r~~sr~a~►~~~~~~~rx:~***,r*~►***** Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound M.ovement : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R .-------------I 11 t Control: 3top Sign 3top 3ign 3top 3ign 3top 3ign : Rights: Include Includ,e Include Includ,e , - Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I if t . Voliune Module : Base Vol: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 Growth Ar3j: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 12 45 5 76 88 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 I User Adj: 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 i PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Volt13 49 6 83 96 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Reduced Vol: 13 49 6 83 96 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 PC& Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MII.F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fina1 Vol.: 13 49 6 83 96 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 ------------I Saturatioa Flow Module: 8at/Lane: 541 541 541 676 676 676 478 478 478 408 408 408 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanea:• 0.19 0.72 0.09 0.40 0.46 0.14 0.14 0.55 0.31 0.11 0.34 0.55 Final 9at.: 103 390 48 268 311 97 66 264 148 46 139 223 ------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.22 Crit M+oves• **w* ------------I Level Of Service M+odule : ' • Delay/Veh: 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 .2.3 LOS by M,ov+e : A A A A A A A A A A A A w,r,►**,r**w,►*,r*~rw,►~*,►**t~***~tww,rw~~**t**~,►,►,t***,~*,r~v*~►w,rr►***~****tr**+r**~*w**w:**~►*~ Traffix Syatem Veraioa 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng •4.a . ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 8-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK - Level Of Service Caaputation Report 1994 HCai 4-Way Stop Method (Future Volim►e Alternative) ***f*~*,t~r*t~e*,►w****,t****f*~*,►*,t,t***t,t+t*,t*******t:,t,t~et~r~~r***tr~*,r*r,t*tr***,►******,t . Interaection 47 3prague 6 Barker - ~r,t*,r**,t**tr***,t*tr****,t*~***tr~~,r*w*~***~,t*********~*t****w~*w,t*trt**,►****,r,t~r*,r*,r~r*♦ Cycle (sec): 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.438 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (aec/veh): 4.0 Optimal Gycle : 0 Level Of 9ervice : A _ !t~****t*!*1t*#A~F*~*!******~r*lrit**A****1r*tF****~***frlr,r*t*tr~rf4lt,►ttlr*ttA***!t***~****:t~ Approach: North Bound 8outh Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I l • Control: 3top Sign 3top 3ign 3top 3ign 3top 9ign ' Rights: Include Include Includ,e Include Zanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 lt 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 . Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 12 45 5 76 88 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 Addsd Vol: 0 87 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 12 132 5 76 227 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Voltmre: 13 144 6 83 247 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R+educed Vol: 13 144 6 83 247 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2W Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 13 144 6 83 247 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 ------------I ---------------11 Saturation Flow M,odule: Sat/Lane: 707 707 707 822 622 822 382 382 382 318 318 318 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.08 0.88 0.04 0.23 0.69 0.08 0.14 0.55 0.31 0.11 0.34 0.55 Final Sat.: 56 625 26 190 564 6B _53 211 119 36 108 173 I II--------------- Capacity Analysis Module: ` Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.28 0.28 Crit M,oves: **w* I II---------= Level Of Service Mcdule: Delay/Veh: 2.4 2.4 2.4 5.3 5.3 5.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 2.4 2.4 2.4 5.3 5.3 5.3 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.9 L03 by MQVe : A A A B B B A A A A A A ~,~**~t*~~~,►*****~►****~**~*~**,►***~►*~******~*~***~~r***~*~************~****~r**#**** Traffix syatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . . . _ . . . . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 9-1 ' TURTLE CREE K BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report I 1'994 HCM Operations Method (Base Volimee Alternativ+e) ~ +r:~,►R,r,t~,►t***t**,r**+r,►*r►*****~*+e***+r,r*,r**~**w,r*,r~~*t,r*~w~w*,r*,t*~****+r,r,r:**:*::~~r~ • . Intersection #6 Appleway b Barker *,~*,r,►,r,r,r******~***:**t***,r,r**~*,►r***,r*:******~*****~~*~***~~►:*:+~***,►~*f~,~t►,r,r*,►** Gycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) 0.464 Loas Tisne (sec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 aec) Average Delay (sec/ve2i) : 16.4 Optimal Cycle: 38 Leve1 Of 3ervice: C , ,►,►*,►,r*,►,►,►,t******tr*****w*,r~►*t,►w~r*t*r**w,►wwr,r*,►***,~~*,t**,►r►***~*r***,►**,r**~,►:**,►~+r* i 'Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bovnd • West Bound ~ . Movement : L - T - R Z, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - , Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected _ Righte: Include Include Include Include ~ Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanea: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1'0 1 0 1 1 0 ~ I--------------- i ~ Vol-lnr-e Module : ~ Base Vol: 24 104 21 8 144 171 138* 301 21 19 324 7 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0..96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Vollan,e: 26 111 23 9 154 183 148 323 23 20 347 B - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vol: 26 111 23 9 154 183 148 323 23 20 347 8 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-W Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 Fina1 Vol.: 26 111 23 9 154 183 148 339 24 20 365 8 9aturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustmesit: 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.16 0.70 0.14 0.03 0.44 0.53 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 2.96 0.04 Final Sat.: 220 940 195 41 695 826 1805 3513 249 1805 3718 82 7-1 II II i Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/sat: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.10 Crit Moves: Green/Gycle: 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.34 0.34 Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.58 0.58 0.*58 0.74 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.29 0.29 ------------I Ievel Of 3ervice Mrodule: Delay/Veh: 12.8 12.8 12.8 15.4 15.4 15.4 34.0 13.9 13.9 23.2 13.9 13.9 Uaer DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 12.8 12.8 12.8 15.4 15.4 15.4 34.0 13.9 13.9 23.2 13.9 13.9 Queue : 0 2 0 0 3 4 4 6 0 0 7 0 *,►*,t,t,r,t****,~*,►t,~~~r*~****t*****rr**~*+r,t***,t**~e**,►+r*~r**,t:*~*rr****t:~,~*******~t►~t*~*~ Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . A . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 10-1 TIJRTLE CREE K - BVILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of 9ervice Detailed Camputation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method Base Voliaae Alternative **,t,tt+t*w*,►R,t*rr*********tr~*****t~t►tr,t~****~*w*t***:*!:******t*~rt!*****~**t*tr~***** Intereection #8 Appleway b Barker w*rr********w~:+t►~~******:~,r***,rw,r*,r**~r***t**,►~*t,~**,tw~r,r~►*+w*~rw*,r*:**,►*s*,t*,rr**** Approach: Nozth Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound M.ov+em,ent : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: ' Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I,ane Group : LTR I,TR LTR I,TR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT #I,ns InGrps : 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 . ' ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops Input 9aturation Adj M,odule: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0$ 0$ 0t 0$ • Parking/Hr: No No No . No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Zype : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnf t Ped/Hr : 0 0 0 0 Exclusiv+eRT: Include Include Include Include $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - ------------I ---------------11 HGM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Cas'e Module: f( rt ) Case : 7 7 7 7 7 7 xooQC 5 5 xoooc 5 5 f(lt) Case: 5 5 5 5 5 5 1xoooc xooot 1 xxxx xcoc ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops 3aturation A,dj Mpdule: . Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xooot 1.00 1.00 - Bus 3tp Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xOCC 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj : 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.83 0.83 0.83 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj : 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.95 xoooc xoootx 0.95 xxxx xooooc HCM Sat Adj: 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Uar 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NLF 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ehl 3at Adj: 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Delay Adjustment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3ignal Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > . DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 O.B5 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 *,r:*,~w~rrw~w*~~~t****~*w**r~t~r**,►,t******~+►,►**,r,r*:**w*#rr*:t*,t*,rrr****~~,r:*******r,t** • Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . ~ d° . - • Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 10-2 , TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Detailed Computation Report (Pezmitted Left Turn 3at Adj ) _ 1994 HCM Operations Method . Base Volim~,e Alternative *~t~*******ti***t1t***fr*f~wt~tr**fts,ts~~►*tr,►**~r*!r*w~~*,►l~:~**********~*****,►*~***,t* Intersection #8 Agpleway b Barker *t:,r,r::~:~e~st*,ts*w~,t****w~***~*~t**~e******~*~t~******+~~:,r*~r*s*****:t*rrrr***~e::t*** Approach: North 3outh East West Gycle Length, C: 90 90 xxaoocc 200cxxoc ` , • , Ar-tual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 34.20 34.20 xooooc "oQOOtx °•Effectiv+e Green Time Per Laae Group, g: 34.20 34.20 xxoooc XXXXXX . , Opposing Effective Green Time, go : 34.20 34.20 xotxoooc 3'H0ooooc Number Of Opposiag Lanea, No : 1 1 xxoooc x0oo0Oc Number Of I,anes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xosxooc x_X)~ - Adj ua ted Lef t-Turn Fl ow Rate, V1 t: 26 9 xooocxs ~oCotxx Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.16 0.03 xoooQCC xXc2= ' Proportion of Left Turna in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.03 0.16 xooooQt ,.CK3cox , Lef t Turns Per Cycle, LTC : 0.65 0.23 xoQOOC xxooQOC , Adjusted Oppoaing Flow Rate, Vo: 346 160 xxooooc ~oooc Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 8.65 4.00 xxxxxx Xooooc Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xoQOOOC >Dcoooc Lost Time Per Phaae, tl : 4.00 4.00 xxxxxx xxooocx Eff grn until arsival of left-turn caz, gf : 13.75 20 . 43 xoooooc ~ccoQac Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.62 0.62 xxooooc %000ooc Eff grn blocked by oppoaing queue, gq: 11.41 4.56 xoooQOC 20o3oQc Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 20.45 13.77 xxxxxx XXoooc i Max opposing caze arriving durinq gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxoooc .1a3ocos Proportion of Oppoaing Thru 6 AT cars, ptho: 0.97 0.84 xoQOOQC MoQOOc Left-turn 3aturation Factor, fa : 31ooQCxx MoQ= XooQOC 20ooQOc Proportion of Left Turas in 3hared Lane, pl: 3100cXooc ~coooac 31oacoos Moooos Through-car Equivalenta, ell: 3.88 1.97 xooooac ~oo:XQc 9ingle Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xooaoc ICooQOc Mini*n+**}+ Left Turn Adjuat-nt Factor, fmin: 0.07 0.06 xxoooc Xcx0osx 3ingle Lane Left Tura Adjuatment Factor, fm: 0.81 , 0.99 xoooQOC 3CKDCKXoc Lef t Turn Adj ua tment Factor, f 1 t: 0.81 0.99 xxxxxx 3oo0= ,r*~*****,t*,r**~**,►~►**~,r~rr*,r,r**,►******rr,►+r,c**~►*~,►,r*****~~*~,►,r~r*****t**,r,r*~►*+rtr**,t,r+rt~ - Traffix 3ystem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inlaud Pacific Eng ~ . • . ri _ - Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 11-1 TURTLE CREEK BUIIaD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Lev+el Of Service Coaputation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method (Eliture Volime Alternative) w,t**~~r,t*:*,►w:*:***tr:~*,r,r*,r,r,twr,r*r►*,►*****f#*tn,t,►~,t~*****~**,t**:*~r**,r~r*,r*,~****,r*~* _ Intersection #8 Appleway 6 Barker • **+t***~rr,~,t**~,r*,►**~~r****,t*******,t*,r,r*,r~~►,r*******~:t**,r,r,r~:*~**~*,►**,rw**~~e*~~,r+r~* Gyicle (aec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.558 Z,osa Time (aec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average 'Delay (aec/v+ph) : 16.1 Optimal cycle: 44 I,evel Of 9ervice: C ***,►*****,r**,►*,r~********,r,►*******,r+r***:*t,rtr~r***:***,r,r,r,r~:~+r*,►*,r,r,r***~~*~e***t*t** Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Permitted Pezmitted. Protected Protected Rights : Incluci,e Iaclude Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II--------------- Vol-imae Module : Base Vol: 24 104 21 8 144 171 138 301 21 19 324 7 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 Added Vol: 15 56 16 4 103 4 8 0 7 29 0 8 Initial Fut: 40 163 37 12 251 180 150 310 29 49 334 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volie: 42 170 39 13 261 188 156 323 30 50 347 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 42 170 39 13 261 188 156 323 30 50 347 16 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1rMF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 Final Vol.: 42 170 39 13 261 188 156 339 32 50 365 17 Saturation Flow Module: 3at/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 I,anes: 0.17 0.68 0.15 0.03 0.56 0.41 1.00 1.83 0.17 1.00 1.91 0.09 Final Sat.: 187 759 174 44 884 636 1805 3438 324 1805 3595 167 ------------I ---------------II I Capacity Analysia Module: Vol/3at: 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.10 0.10 Crit Movea: . s*+rt *t*~r f~*r ' Green/Gycle: 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.15 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.18 0.18 Vol,,-/Cap: 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.56 0.56 ------------I Level Of 9ervice Module : Delay/Veh: 8.6 8.6 8.6 9.8 9.8 9.8 24.6 17.6 17.6 26.5 22.4 22.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 8.6 6.6 8.6 9.8 9.8 9.8 24.6 17.6 17.6 26.5 22.4 22.4 Qweue : 1 3 1 0 5 3 4 7 1 1 8 1 **w,r****,r#,r*****,t~►t►***,~,►:t,►w****+r*+~~r:tr***~t►+t,t***,t**~*t****s~***+~~►**~r***,r*:+►****,r Traffix 9ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I.icenaed to Inland Pacific Eng '.r_ . . 1 y.. Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 12-1 • TURTLE CREEK - BUILD OUT WZTH PROJECT Y PM PEP.K Level Of Sezvice Detailed Coatputation Report • 1994 HCM Operations Method Future Voli,e Alternative #*****,t****~,►~*,►*****,r**~**f**~*,~***,►,r*:,r,r~~*~,r~***,►,r**~►**,►#*~~**~**,r**~~t*~***** • Intersection #18 Appleway 6 Barker **:r**+r,►~r:*~r:t~r**,~:**t~*~e*~*t*t******,t******tr***,tt*,►,~****,t*****tr~r:,rt*,r,r*,r:**:*~: Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 , HC2M Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module: ' Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 • Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR I,TR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT • #LneInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ------------I ---------------H ---------------11 ---------------II I HCM Op8 Input Saturation Adj M,odule: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 ' % Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 . Grade: 0$ 0$ 0% 0$ Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus 3tp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0 ExclusivetT: Include Include Include Include , % RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - ~---------------11 ---------------11 ~ ACM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: I f(rt) Caee: 7 7 7 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xoot 5 5 f(1 t) C as e: 5 5 5 5 5 5 1xooot xxxx 1xoooc xxxx ---------------11 ~ -II II I HCM Opa 3aturation Adj Module: ~ Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xooc 1.00 1.00 xococ 1.00 1.00 Bus 3tp Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoooc 1.00 1.00 xofloc 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.84 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xoooc 0.99 0.99 LT Adj : 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 xciQC xoocxoc 0.95 xxxx xtxxt HCM 3at Adj: 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.62 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 Usr 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLE' 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 E'ril 3at Adj: 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 . 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Delay Adjustment Factor Mcdule: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signal Zype : < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 . f:t**t*~s~et*~stf~*t,r~~~**#**~#~***~*#:,t,r~►:~~*****~~t*t**~*t*,r**~~*,r,r**:~*~t#t*,►:~* ~ Traffix syatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eag Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 12-2 • TITRTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK I,ev+el Of 3ervice Detailed Coaputation Report (Permitted I,eft Turn Sat Adj) ' 1994 HCM Operations Method - Fliture Vol-l- Alternativ+e ******f~~►**w~**~r~►,t*t**~*,►,t*,t+t********w*wt*~r*~*:*,t*,t#t*~,ttt***:*:~,►,►,►*,~*w,tw~tt***rr Interaection #8 Appleway 6 Barker *,t~,tt**~*,►*wt,t*~*~*,rtr*,rt~r**~***,t,►***,t*,tr►**~*ir*~tt~*fw:*,►:*~~~~,t+rtr:*trt~**t**w,►tr*~w* Approach: Nozth South East West Gycle Length, C: 90 90 xxooooc XXnatxx Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 47.70 47.70 xoocxoQC 3o3o3oc Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 47.70 47 . 70 xxoQOQC XDDosxx Opposing Effective Green Time, go: 47.70 47.70 xxxooc CX3Cooc . Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: 1 1 Xcofloos llccoooc • Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 soooooc 3ooooot Adj us ted Lef t-Turn Fl ow Rate, Vl t: 42 13 xofloooc >DDcKX{ Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.17 0.03 xx).o= 1110ocotx Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.03 0.17 xoooooc .11aooooc Left Turns Per Gycle, I,TC: 1.05 0.33 xoooooc J1HCx3CKxoc Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 462 251 xxfloooc ,oooooc Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Gycle, Volc: 11.55 6.28 xxxxxx .1<30CxXX Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo : 1.00 1.00 xooc~QC 3XooXXX Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 >coQCCt CKDccoc • Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 15.65 27.21 xxxxxx XXoocXoc Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.47 0.47 xxooooc X2DCx3Cx Eff grn blocked by oppoeing queue, gq: 10.31 4.99 xxxxxx xXooooc _ Eff grn while lef t turns f il ter thru, gu : 32 . 05 20.49 xocQOOC >oooooc Ma,x opposing cars arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx XX20ooc Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cara, ptho: 0.97 0..83 xoQOOC *PoooQOC Left-turn 3aturation Factor, fe : )ooQOOC 310CHoQCx 3X2oooos x00ocXoc Proportion of Left Turna in 3hared Lane, pl: 21o00oQC .1<20oQOC 2000txx XxoooQc Through-car Equivalenta, ell: 6.51 2.79 xococQC XoQOOc Single Lane Through-caz Equivalenta, e12: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx XXQOQOc Mini*n+= Left Turn Adjuetment Factor, fmin: 0.05 0.04 xoooooc >oooaoc 3ingle I,ane Left Turn Adjust-nt Factor, fm: 0.67 0.98 xoooooc >oooQOc Lef t Turn Adj us tment Fac tor , f l t: 0.67 0.98 xoQOOQC Xcoooc ***,►**f*,►*~e,r*****,►,t~**~w*,r*****r~,~***,r*:***+t****+rrr~,~*r►~****~**~*t********,t*~*rt~►w Traff.ix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inlaad Pacific Eng ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995'09:57:17 Page 13-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HGM Unsignalized Method (Base Volie Alternative) ,t*,~,t***w*:**t*:f**+~+etr***,t*,t****:,t**,►,t,~**,t,t****t,►,t*tr*~r►+r~,t:tt~:*~,t**~ew~r*~*~r**,t*** , Intersectiori #10 WB Raaps & Barker ~ *~~r******~~,r*~r**~,~***,t**********t******,r,r*:*~*****rr*****~***tt►*te**,r****,r*~rt**~r** ~ Average Delay (aec/veh) : 2.4 Worst Case I,evel Of 3ervice: - C ***:t***t*tr,t,rt*t~t***tw*,►*,t,t***w***~*tr*+t**tr*****,►*~t**~~**tr*,r*t**,t,r*w~rr****tr**** ~ Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound Mov+ement : I, - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R 11 . Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign Stop 3ign Riqhts : Includ,e Includ,e Includ,e Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0'0 ~ • Vol- Module : ~ ' Base Vol: 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Initial Bse: 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.89 0.89 PHF Voltane: 104 391 22 14 292 131 47 10 8 30 35 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 104 391 22 14 292 131 47 10 8 30 35 25 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Adj us ted Vol-l- Module : Grade: 0$ 0t 0$ 0$ $ Cycle/Care : Xtxx xxxx Xocxx ~ Xoos Xc>QC XcXot XQCx xMtx $ Truck /Comb : aoooc .10coc xxxx x>ooc xxXot Xooc *.oooc 2oooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : xxxx xxxx V-aooc xx>ot 3oocx Xtxx XQOC XXoot TrcJc /Cmb PCE : Xsxx Xc>m 3CKaoc 30ooc 30ooc XX)m xmooc =ooc . Adj Vol.: 114 391 22 15 292 131 52 11 9 33 38 28 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap M,odule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 NPH « Mov+eUp Time : 2.1 xoos xoooos 2.1 xxxx xxocxc 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Cri ti ca1 Gp : 5. 0xxxoc xooQQC 5. 0xxxt xxxQC 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 Capacity Module: . Cnflict Vol: 423 xooc xooooc 413 xxxx xcQOQC 906 887 357 886 942 402 Potent Cap.: 1078 xooc >Dnoac 1090 xxxx xooooc 316 373 913 325 349 667 Adj Cap : 1.00 xooot xoQOQC 1.00 xoons xoQOOt 0.77 0.84 1.00 0.85 0.84 1.00 Mov+e C ap 10 7 8xxxoc xooooc 1090 xxxx xoocxt 244 315 913 276 2 95 867 ------------I II II I,evel Of 3ervi ce Module : 3 topped Del : 3. 7xoooc xooooc 3. 3xooQC xoocxx 18.3 11.8 4.0 14.6 13.8 4.3 L03 by Move: A ~ t A ~ * * * * * * * ; Mav+emezit : LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT shared Cap.: xoooc xxxx xooQOC xoooc xoooc xxooc xxxx 279 xxxxc xooot 352 ,ooQOc Shrd 3 tpDel : xco= xoQOC xcooc xoocQC xxxx xxcxoc xoooot 16.9 >ooc)oc xooooc 13.7 xcooc Shared L03: * * * * * * * C * * C * ApproachDel: 0.8 0.1 15.5 11.4 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 14-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Lev+el Of 3ervzce Computation Report 1994 HtM Unaignalized Method (Future Volinave Alternative) **~***,t*******~r,►*,~*~*~tr~r,r~r~c,r~►*~*tr**~►~****~~r,~***,r,r,rw**+~,►*:***:,r~::***,r*,t*:*~**~** Intersection #10 'WB Ftaimps 6 Barker ***r►,t,t~*r►**,t*,►*rr*,►*****,r*,►*i***+t,►:*,r******~****,t***~**~*w***~t,t:,t~t****,►**,r,►**,t,t** Average Delay (aec/veh) : 3.3 Worat Case Level. Of Sezviae: D *w**~**~w,rw*,r*~►,►*****~►**,r****~******~~e*f*+rrr,rr*,►~r******,r,r*,r*•,r,r,r,►,r**,~*:**~*t,rw,r*w Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound East Bound West Bound M,ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I 11 ---------------11 . Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop.3ign 3top Sign : Rights: Include Include Include Includ,e I,anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I ~ Volim►e Module : : Base Vol: 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 Added Vol: 39 53 0 0 22 17 8 0 21 0 0 0 ' Initial F1at: 132 402 20 12 283 134 50 9 28 27 31 23 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.89 PFiF Vol--: 147 450 22 14 317 150 56 10 32 30 35 25 - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina1 Vol.: 147 450 22 14 317 150 56 10 32 30 35 25 Adjusted Volie Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : 30ooc xDoQC xxxx Xoaoc 30= Xooc xxxx XQOc $ TrucJc/Comb: XXoQC 20ocx Mooc Xxooc Xocx x2ooc xOcx .FCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : J1oatx Xcxx -ooot XoQC XXotX Xooc =o= XcMc Trck/Cmb PCE : Xoocx XXDoc 3oQCx x300x 3-03cx xmoc Xootx >oooc Adj Vol.: 162 450 22 15 317 150 62 11 35 33 38 28 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/S): 30 NPH « M,oveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx xoooot 2.1 xocos xoooc 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xoQOQC 5.0 xxxx xooQOC 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 ------------I 11 ---------------1 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 467 xxxx xoo~ot 471 xoooc xoooc 1043 1024 392 1034 1088 461 Potent Cap.: 1027 xooot x=ct 1022 xxxx xxoxx 263 316 877 267 293 809 Adj Cap : 1. 0 0xoocx xotxxt 1. 0 0xaooc xmooc 0.69 0.77 1.00 0.76 0.77 1.00 M,ove Cap.: 1027 xxxx xooocx 1022 xxxx xoccos 182 242 877 203 224 809 ------------I 11 Level Of Service Module : Btopped Del: 4.1 xxxx xoocxS 3.6 xcooc xooooc 28.5 15.5 4.3 20.9 19.0 4.6 L03 by Move: A * * A * * ~ * * * * Movement : LT - I,TR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT 3hared Cap. : xaooc xxxx xxxcc xoooc xxxx ,oo= xxxx 254 >ooooc xxxx 2 6 9 xooQOc Shrd stpDel : ,-oooQC xxxx xoooc xoooas ~ooc~t >oQOOC xoooQC 23.1 xooQQC xooooc 20.0 xxxcx 3ha.red L03: D * w D * - ApproachDel: 1.0 0.1 19.3 15.5 Traffix Syatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eag _ b _ . . . Fzi Aug 16, 1995 09:57:17 Pag+e 15-1 TURTZE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT ' PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Camputation Report 1994 HQM Unsignalized Method (Base Voltame Alternative) ' ~,~,t:*******~r**~**k~*~r~*:**rr**~**~::**,r*~r****~t****,r*****w***:******,r,rrr**,r*+r,~**,r* Intezsection #22 3prague b Appleway ,t,t,►,►~*~,r*tr*~t,r,t*trtr*tr~*t:t:**~►~r*****t***st►~**~*!t***********,t,t,t*tttr~s~t,►t~►*wt*f,tt*,►** Avierage Delay (eQC/veh) : 5.5 Worat Case Level Of 3ervice: F ,►**:****~**~►,►***:*+r*~t*~***tt*****#~:,~*~r******,r*+r**t*~►:~~~~:~*****,r~*******~**,r* Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bouad West Bound Movement : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R . ------------I 11 ---------------11 Control: 3top 9ign 3top Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled ' Rights : Include Includ,e Include Includs Lanea : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I Volie Module : Baee Vol: 86 1 4 0 0 13 6 521 168 3 538 6 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ~ PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Tnitial Hae: 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 UBeZ Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Voltim4e : 99 1 5 0 0 15 7 601 194 3 620 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 99 1 5 0 0 15 7 601 194 3 620 7 ------------I Adjusted Volie Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : NosXQC x3ooc Xooc XXoQC xXooc xx>oc XcQC 3oooc $ TrucJc/Camb: %Doc 2ooot 20ocx xXoQC Xoot xxooc ' ~oooc Xooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gyicl/Car PCE : 20otx 3== 20oos Xooc 2oooc XDoc Xocx Xooc Trck/Gmb PGE : x>oos .40cmx Xc2os >ooM MQCx xXoc .10ooc xx= Adj Vol.: 109 1 5 0 0 16 8 601 194 4 620 7 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W) : 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2. 6xooooc xooc 2.6 2.1 xococ xocxooc 2.1 2oooc xooQOc Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 xQOOC xxxx 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxoooc 5.5 xxxx xxoot 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: • Cnflict Vol: 1335 1335 397 xoooc xxxx 314 627 xooc xooooc 794 xoooc xoogoc Potent Cap.: 148 181 871 xooc xxxx 960 790 xxxx xoooos 642 xaQS xoooQc Adj Cap: 0.96 0.97 1.00 ' xxxx aocxc 1.00 1.00 xxxx xooQQt 1.00 xcooc xooQOc Mcve Cap.: 143 176 871 xococ xxxx 960 790 xoooc xooooc 642 xooot xoooz I -11--------------- 11 ---------------11 Level Of service Module: 3 topped Del : 77.7 20.6 4. 2=aooc xoooc 3. 8 4. 6xQOt -ocoos 5. 6xsxx xaooc IAS,by Mov+e : F * * * * A A * * B * * Moveament: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap.: xoooc x)= 486 xoooc xoooc xoQOt xooos xooc xocccx xoooc xxxx xxxoc 9hrd 9 tpDel : >=ooz xaoc 7.5 xooooc xoQOC xooocx xxxoc xocoz xooocx xoo= xoooc xcoooc 9hared L03: • * g * * ~ * r * * * * ApproachDel: 73.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 Traffix System VerBion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng , v . . t l~. Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 16-1 TiTRTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volie Alternativ+e) ,t,ttr***t*,t~t**,t,►***:*+►•*•t**:~:tftr,►t:tr*****t:t*~tr~**t►w*****~r*,►,r:,t*:~r~w,t**t*tr~►:,rf~,rre Interaection #22 Sprague & Appleway - • **,r***s~r****,~*tr,t~rr~►s,r:,r,►~~w*~,t,r,►,t,rt**+t**,t**~**tr*~r****,r*~,t*********~~r**,r*~*~**:** Average Delay (aec/veh) : 7.2 Worat Case I.evel Of 9ervice: F w,t**~***,t****,r*,t,►t*,►~r**,t****~*******trtr~r****rr*~r*,tf**s,t,t**~*,t,t***,►~r*~r,rw***,t,►n+i+~,t~r~ Approach: North Bouad South Bound Eaet Bound Weat Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _ ------------I 11 ---------------11 ti Control: 3top 3ign 9top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Righta: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------I Volie Module : Base Vol: 86 1 4 0 0 13 6 521 168 3 538 6 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 Addsd Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 24 0 19 0 Initial Fut: 90 1 4 0 0 13 6 552 197 3 574 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - PFIF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volt"Tae: 101 1 5 0 0 15 7 618 221 3 642 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Fina1 Vol.: 101 1 5 0 0 15 7 618 221 3 642 7 Adj us ted Voltmme Module : Grad,e: 0$ 0% 0% 0$ ' $ Gycle/Cars : xxxx xxxx x1= 20aoc Ioooc xXocx 2oooc Xosxx $ Truc]c /Comb : .1-00ot xxxx 310= =00c Xooc 2oooc 31-ooot xxoo[ PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PCE : .143cx .112= 2ococ xxXoc x0osx 2oooc 20= )ocCc Trck/Ctnb PCE : Y~ xxXX XXooc x0ooc 3oOoc xxxx xXooc 333ooc Adj Vcl.: 111 1 5 0 0 16 8 618 221 4 642 7 _ Critical Gap Mndule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/'W): 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2. 6== xxxx 2.6 2.1 xoaoc xxooos 2.1 xxxx xooooc Critical Gp: 7.0 .6. 5 5.5 xcoxoc xoooc 5.5 5.5 xoooc xooooc 5. 5xxoc xxxxx ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 , Capacity Mcdule: Cnflict Vol: 1388 1387 419 xoooc xooac 324 649 xoooc xxoocx 839 xcoQS xxoQt Potent Cap.: 137 168 849 xxxx xoooc 948 7 6 9xoQCC xoQOOS 606 xxxx xxosx Adj C ap : 0.96 0.97 1.00 xxxx x)oot 1.00 1. 0 0xooos xoocxc 1. 0 0xxQC xcoooc , Move Cap.: 132 163 849 xooc xooos 948 7 6 9xxotx xooosx 608 xooos xoaQac ------------I ---------------11 Level Of 3ervice Module: Stopped De1:103.7 22.2 4.3 xoooQC xxxx 3.9 4.7 ~ooQC xxooac 6.0 xcom xooooc L09 by Move: F * * * * p p, B * * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xoooc xxxx 462 Nooac 2oosx xooooc 3oox xooc IoQOOC 2cxooz Xc= 2CX3= 3hrd 3tpDel:>oc~oc xoooc 7.9 xooooc xxxx xooQC x=ooc xoooc >ooooc xoo= xooQC >ooooc 3hared L03: * * g * t * • * * * * * ApproachDel: 98.5 3.9 0.0 0.0 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . . ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 17-1 TURTLE CREEK BU= OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report ~ 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Base Volume Alternativ+e) ♦*~r~rtr*,trr*,t*~***,r**t****,t:,r****t*,r:*~,►ww~r,tw,ttt*,►*,t*f~t~****rr***,t:~~r~►,r~~*~r**~*w*** - Intersection #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMP3 *,r:**::,r::~~**tr**wwttt,ttr**w*,t*****t,t**~rt,r****~~t*t**st,r*r~,r*,t**t******,r~**tr**~R*** Averag+e Delay (sec/v+eh) : 5.9 Worat Case I,evel Of 3ervice: D rrw**,~***,r********~rf*f********,r*****:****~rf*,r**,r*w***:t*t,t*,t,r***tr~~**~,rrr~~*~,~:*:* Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound . . Moveayent : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~ ' 11 ---------------11 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrclled 3top 3ign 3top 3ign Aights : Include Includ,e Includ,e Include ~'e,• Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 . 11 ---------------11 . Volume Modu,le: Base Vol: 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 Gzowth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ~ . PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Initial Bae: 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Vollmee: 0 317 38 73 225 0 247 1 171 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 317 38 73 225 0 247 1 171 0 0 0 i - 11 ---------------II II Adjuated Volume Mcdule: Grade: 0% 0$ 0$ 0% $ Gycle/Cars : Xxxoc XoQC .1o0cx .1<20oc xxxx xx}oc .10oQC 2osMc $ Truck/Camb: I"oooc 31ocxx 3oooc 3CK2ot 2oooc xxxx .1oooc xMooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Caz PCE : xxxx xoooc *o= JXo= Xoot Xoot Xooc XooQc Trck /Cmb PCE : Xtx,x XXoot 3cooc 31~ >oQOC Motx .1oooc Xmtxx Adj Vol.: 0 317 38 80 225 0 271 1 188 0 0 0 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run Speed(N/3): 30 NPH « MoveUp Time : xootxoc xoooc xootxx 2.1 xoooc xooQC 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxoooc xooQC'xooooc Cri ti ca1 Gp:."Doooc 2oooc x20= 5. 0xoooc xoQOOC 6.5 6.0 5. 5xoacxc xxxx xxooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xooos xoooc xxxaos 355 xxxx xooooc 634 653 225 xoooc xoooc xocxxoc Potent Cap.: xooc xxxx xocxx 1161 xooot xoooat 455 496 1065 xoot xooot xxooc Adj Cap : xxxx xxxx xxcxx 1.00 xoocc xxoooc 0.92 0.92 1.00 xoooc xoooc mQOCx • Move Cap. : xoooc xoQOC xacxxQC 1161 xxxx =ooc 419 457 1065 xQOS xoooc xxxxc ------------I ---------------H ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------I I,evel Of Service Mcdule : 3topped Del:xooooc xocxoc xocxxt 3.3 xcogc xooooc 20.7 7.9 4.0 xooooc xxxx xoogoc L09 by Mov+e : t * t A ~ ~ * * A * * ♦ . Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT shared Cap. : xoooc xoooc aooooc xoooc xoooc xoooQC 419 xoooc xoo= xoooc xoocc =ooc 9hrd stpDel:xooooc x>ooc xooooc xoc= xxxx xosxooc 20.8 xooc xooooc ~oooac io= xooooc Shared L03: D ApproachDel: 0.0 0.9 13.9 0.0 ✓ Traffix 9ystem Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Znland Pacific Eng . . .u'r 1 Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 18-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of Service Computation,Report • 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Eliture Volie Alternative) *:*:*,r*,►*****,r:***~►*,r*~**,r**,t:~►~r**~e**r►~***,r*~****r►**,~***,►*~**~*~+~***:**:****:*** Interaection #30 BnRKER/EB I-90 RAMPS ,►***,r*,►*~**t,~f*:*r*t*#,r,r,r*,r~,r,t,r,r,~**tf~::**:*~tf~*f***t*:*wt~~trtr*t►*t,t***,t*t~,t*~,r~► Average Delay (aec/veh) : 11.5 Worat Case Level Of 3ervice: . F *,►*,t,►*~+t***~w****,t*,t*,t***:**~~,r*********f*~*~t,tf*.►,t,t:,t*+rf~f*ltr~**~ttr***,t***t,t*+tte,t Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound Eaet Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R I, - T - R I ---------------11 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 3top Sign . Rights : Includ,e Includ,e . Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Initial Bse: 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 Add.ed Vol: 0 60 12 4 39 0 32 0 72 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 0 362 48 73 254 0 267 1 235 0 0 0 ~ Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Voline: 0 380 50 77 266 0 280 1 247 0 0 0 - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 380 50 77 266 0 280 1 247 0 0 0 Adjusted Volvme Module: Grad,e: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Care : Xooc XXooc XxoQt xaoos Xrxx xx= Maos xXoc $ TrucJc /Comb : 20ooc x~ ~ooc~c >oont x~oQC >oooc xxxoc >coQc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Caz PCE : 20ocx >oooc >oaot ~o= Xoooc xxxx 20ooc XoQc Trck /Cab PCE : 20oot XtIAoc 20oot .7oaoc >oooc ~oaoc .1ocxx Adj Vol.: 0 380 50 85 266 0 308 1 271 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed (N/3) _ 30 NPH_ « MoveUp Ta.me : =QOC xoQOC =ooc 2.1 xcQOC imgc 3.4 3.3 2.6 xotxQC xooot xoooc Cri ti cal Gp:xooooc xoooc xxoxc 5. 0xoQOC xooocx 6.5 6.0 5. 5xoxxx xoooc xooooc ii II - I Capacity Module: Cnf l i c t V o 1: xooos xxxx xxoocx 430 xxxx xxxxc 749 774 266 xooc xoooc xooooc Po tent Cap.: xccoc xxxx xooQOC 10 6 9xooQC xoooQC 390 428 1015 xoooc xxxx xotxocx Adj Cap: xxxx xooQt xoQOOC 1.00 xoooc xoooQC 0.91 0.91 1.00 xooos xooot >oQOOt Move C ap xxxx >ooot 2ooocx 10 6 9xooc >ocfloc 354 388 1015 xoooc xoooc xoooc ------------I Level Of 3ervice Mcdule: 3 topped Del :xooooc xxxx xooocx 3. 6xoocx xxxooc 45.5 9.3 4. 7xxooot xoocc xoooot L09 by Mnve: * * * A * * * * A * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap.: xoooc xxxx >oooc xo~os xxxx >ocooc 354 xxxx >ooooc xoooc xoooc xoooxx Shrd 8 tpDel : moooc xococ >oooc >oaoc xoooc xooos 46.0 xoooc xoQSxx >ooooc xoooc ~oooc 3hared L03: * * * * * F * * * * * - ApproachDel: 0.0 0.9 26.4 0.0 Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,iceneed to Inland Pacific Eng , Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 19-1 TURTIE CREEK BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM PEAK Lev+el Of Service Coaputation Report , 1994 HCM Unsigrialized Method (Base Volie Alternative) f4*tr~~**w***tr****~*1t*:~****trw**,tt:t*,tww**+t***,t::*~~l,t*~**~#*t*~:~t~t,t*,t*,t,tfff*,►~t*tr* , Interaection #55 3prague & Long *,r,r,r,►***t***,►s*,►******s~*,►*~tt~*~*~*~~~r*~**t****~**~,t:**~►~r►*~*,►**w***#**~*~e*,r,t,t,r Average Delay (aec/v+eh) : 0.5 Worst Case I,ev+el Of Service: A ,~**,~**,r**,r*tr*******t*:*~r****~*,r****t~rw*~*,r**~►*,r**r+r:*,r,rt**rr~,t*,►*,►*~**~***,t*****f Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound Weat Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I 11 ---------------11 ~ Control: 3top 9ign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Includs Include Include Includ,e : Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ------------I ~ Voliutve Module : Base Vol: 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 8 82 0 , Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Initial Bse: 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 8 84 0 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00•1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PKF Volie: 23 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 18 9 94 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Final Vol.: 23 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 18 9 94 0 . ------------I 11 e Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0$ 0t 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : x0ocx 200oc xXXx XcXos x0otx .10ooc .1.0QOC 2osxx $ Truck/Camb: XXooc 2oooc 2CK2tx >0ocx .10= 2~ >oooc Xooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Caz PCE : x2ocx 3otxx .10oo{ 20oQC XooQC xxxot Xotxx Xotxoc Trc3c/Cmb PG'E: 3cmam XXXX -CKXX 30ooc .100cx >oooc xXooc >oooc Adj Vol.: 25 0 4 0 0 0 0 152 18 10 94 0 11 Critica2 Gap Madule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « Mov+aUp Time: 3.4 3oooc 2.6 xaoxoc 2ooc mQOOC =oooc xaooc 2aocxx 2.1 mooc mootx Critical Gp: 6.5 xoooc 5.5 Xoocx Mooc 200oc )ooooc Xooc 2ooooc 5.0 xxxx xxxot. 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity M,odule: Cnf l i o t Vo 1: 265 xcoac 161 xoooc xoooc >ooooc -oooc xooc xooocx 17 0xxoc xooQc Potent Cap.: 744 xxxx 1147 xoooc xooc xxxooc xoooc xxxx xxxoc 1422 xoooc xooctoc . Adj Cap : 0.99 xxxx 1.00 xoaoc xxxx xxxooc xxxx xcooc xxoooc 1.00 xQOC xooxa Mov+e Cap.: 738 xxxx 1147 xoooc xxxx xxxcc xxxx xxxx xo~oos 1422 xoQOC xooxcc . ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 II I I,gvel Of 9ervice Module: - 3tvpped Dtl: 5.0 xxxx 3.1 xotxoot xoonc xxxxc xctxxx xoooc xxxoc 2.5 xxxx xooocx L03 by Mave : * * * * * * * * * p * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT 9hared Cap. : xoooc 774 xxoogc xoQOC xoooc xooocc xoooc xxxx xooooc xoooc x)= xxxoc . 9hrd stpDel : xocxxoc 4.8 x~ooc xoooc xoQOC xoQOC moKxoc xooos xccx= moooc xcocc xcooc Shared IAB: * A * * * * * ,t * ~ t ApproachDel: 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 Traffix 3ystem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . d , . • . I Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:57:17 Page 20-1 TLTRTLE CRE E K ' BUILD OUT WITH PROJECT PM P'EAK Lev+el Of Service Coaputation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Fliture Voliae Alternativ+e) ,r~~r***t*,t,r**~**~r*~t*,t,t,t«t*,r*:*:*~r**,r*rt,r~*ww~rw*,ttr*,t***,tw,t,~,t**rr~e**~,t************** ~ Intersection #55 3prague b Long ~*~*:~,►,t,t*,t*******,t**,t*,t,ttr*,t,tr*+t*rr***,trr**~r*~*~r******t,t::tt~:~r***,►w*,tr*,t,t,r*,tt**t* ~ Average Delay (aec/veh): 0.5 Worst Case Lev+el Of 3ervice: A ,r*:*****,r,►*********,r~r,r**,~**~**~**,r***tf#:,t**,►,►,►,r,r,►**,rw***:*~**+r*~~,r,r,r******:,►,r,►* Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : I, - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R I2 - T - R ------I 11 ---------------11 . Control: 3top 3ign Stop 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled I Rights : Include Include Include Include „ • r Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ------------I . Volume Module: ' Baae Vol: 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 8 82 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 9 84 0 Addsd Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 41 8 84 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Vol-,-: 25 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 46 9 94 0 - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E'inal Vol.: 25 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 46 9 94 0 Adj ue ted Voltu~e Module : Grade: 0% 0$ 0$ 0$ ' $ Cycle/Cars : .10cxx xxxx >0ooc 30ooc >ooac xxxx x~ooc >oocx $ Truck /Comb : J%oooc 'oQOC Xoot x00cx Xoooc Xooc xx~oc >oooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/car PCE : Xooc Xooc >oooc x= 2CKXc Xtxx xxaoc >0ocx ~ Trck/C.~ab PCE : xxxx Xooc Xooc >oooc Xooc X)ooc Xooc Xotx t Adj Vol.: 28 0 4 0 0 0 0 152 46 10 94 0 1 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 xoooc 2. 6 >oosxx xxxx 3oooQC xooooc mooc xoo= 2.1 xxxx xoaQOc Cri ti cal Gp : 6.5 xxxx S. 5x)o= xxxx xooocx xooos xooc xxoooc 5.0 xxxx xocxxx ------------I 11 . Capacity Module: • Cnf l i c t Vo l: 2 7 8xoooc 175 >oooc xxxx xooooc -oooc =ooc xmcac 19 8xoooc xoQOOc Po tent Cap.: 730 xxxx 1129 xoooc xotxoc xoQOOC xooQC xooos xxaooc 13 8 0xxooc xooQOc ~ Adj Cap: 0.99 xoooc 1.00 xooQC xoooc xooQOC xxxx xoooc xooQOS 1.00 xoooc =ooc , Move Cap. : 725 xxxx 1129 xooc xooot xootxc xoooc x2oot xoooQC 1380 xxxx xoooc I 11 I,evcl Of 3ervice Module: 3toppecl Del: 5.1 xxxx 3.2 xoo~QC xxxx xooooc xxxxc xocc xocxooc 2.6 xoooc xooocx LOS by M,ove : * * * rr ,t * * * * A • ~ Mcv+ement : Z,T - LTR - RT LT - I,TFt - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - I,TR - RT 3hared Cap.: xoooc 758 xctxxc xooc xxxx xooooc xoooc xxxx xxoot xxxx xooQC xooQOc 3hrd 3tgDel:xooQC 4.9 xooooc xocoQC xxxx xo~oQC xxQOC xaoc >ooocc xooooc xoooc >ooQOc 3hared LOS: * A * * * * * * * * * * Approac23De1: 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 I Traffix 3ystem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceaeed to Inland Pacific Eng .1 ! - , • . _ s : . a_ ~r ~ . - ' SER~`C .~L.I VELs a T SCEN~'` PM O , ~Y~ r .p,Rp3EcT~D LE YQ►R , , 000 ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ 1 . . 1 ~ ~ . Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:38:55 Pag+e 1-1 TLTFtTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENr AM PEP,K Trip Generation Report ~ Forecast for Zone Rate Rate Trips Tripa Total $ Of • # 3ubzone Amount Unita In Out In Out Tripa Total 1 MORNII1GSIDE 120.00 SEflU 0.19 0.55 23 66 89 34.8 Zone 1 3ubtotal 23 66 89 34.8 3 MEADOWVIEW T 40.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 8 22 30 11.7 Zone 3 3ubtotal 8 22 30 11.7 4 RIVERFAI.K 120.00 3FDU 0.19 0.55' 23 66 89 34.8 Zone 4 3ubtotal 23 66 89 34.8 5 TtJRTLE GREEK 29.00 3EflU 0.19 0.55 6 16 22 8.6 Zone 5 3ubtotal 6 16 22 8.6 6 MEADOWVIEw R 35.00 3FDU 0.19 0.55 7 19 26 10.2 Zone 6 3ubtotal 7 19 26 10.2 TOTAL 67 189 256 100.0 i i ~ Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:39:59 Page 2-1 T[TRTIE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT . AM PF.AK Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips ~ To Gates Z 3 6 7 B 9 11 12 Zone 1 0.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 10.0 25.0 ~ 3 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 4 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40.0 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 45.0 6 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 r Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to InZand Pacific Eng :L'• . Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:02 Page 3-1 TURTZE CREEK ALTEFtNATIVE DEVELOPi&NT AM PEAK Turning Movement Report Vol~e Northbound 9outhbound Eastbound Weatbound Total Z`ype Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thni Right Lef t Thru Right Volie 1!2 3altese & Sullivan _ Base 0 286 25 35 82 0 0 0 0 60 0 167 655 Added 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 36 Total 0 286 25 44 82 0 0 0 0 60 0 193 691 #6 8th 6 Barker Base 2 39 2 13 27 0 3 0 4 5 0 18 113 A,d,ded 0 62 0 7 22 4 15 0 0 0 0 19 128 Total 2 101 2 20 49 4 18 0 4 5 0 37 242 ' #7 3prague 6 Barker Base 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 409 - Added 0 96 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 Tota1 24 194 6 11 73 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 537 #B Appleway 6 Barker Base 45 173 23 5 50 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 858 Added 10 64 22 7 23 7 2 0 2 8 0 2 146 Tota1 55 237 45 12 73 113 • 58 215 13 31 147 5 1004 #!10 WB Ramps 6 Barker Base 179 149 59 20 143 1A6 8 16 6 23 25 8 623 Acided 42 20 0 0 22 26 2 0 6 0 0 0 118 Total 221 169 59 20 165 213 11 16 12 23 25 8 941 #ill Misaion b Barker Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 6 16 7 2 0 0 0 0 46 0 20 97 Total 0 6 16 7 2 0 0 0 0 46 0 20 97 #13 24th & Sullivan Base 6 341 6 15 94 19 93 16 0 8 119 122 839 Added 0 26 0 O 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Total 6 367 6 15 103 19 93 16 0 8 119 122 875 # 14 16 th 6 Sul 1 ivan Base 30 819 3 17 233 68 180 8 11 1 10 72 1452 Added 0 26 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Tota1 30 846 3 17 242 68 180 8 11 1 10 72 1488 #15 4th & suliivan •BaBe 29 1088 30 36 327 22 24 11 3 24 8 58 1660 Add,ed 0 26 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Total 29 1114 30 36 336 22 24 11 3 24 8 58 1695 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng s. . Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:04 Page 3-2 Z'LTRTLE CREEK ALTERAiATIVE DEVELOPMENT , AM PF.AK Volt- Northbound 3outhbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Lef t Thru Right I,ef t Thni Right I,ef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Voliane • #16 3prague & 3ullivan ' . Base 129 781 156 114 307 151 194 241 58 100 311 147 2688 A,dded 3 23 0 0 8 0 0 6 1 0 17 0 59 Total 132 604 156 lla 315 151 194 247 59 100 329 147 2747 #22 3prague 6 Appleway Base 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 324 73 1 366 6 925 Added 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 16 0 23 Total 115 1 3 2 1 7 5 329 75 1 403 6 948 #25 TRENT & BARKER ' Base 59 0 30 0 0 0 0 199 57 64 872 0 1280 Added 26 0 0 0• 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 35 ' ' Total 85 0 30 0 0 0 0 199 66 64 872 0 1315 #30 BARKER/EB I-90 R1mp3 Base 0 355 9 47 103 0 83 1 24 0 0 0 623 A,d,ded 0 53 16 7 21 0 9 0 15 0 0 0 121 Total 0 408 25 54 124 0 93 1 39 0 0 0 744 #i55 3prague 6 I.ong • - Base 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 243 Added 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 Total 48 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 43 5 66 0 246 Traffix Syateffi Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific 8ng . t y• i . i Y~ . . Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:07 ~ Page 4-1 TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMEN'r AM PF.AK Impact Analysis Report ~ I,evel Of service Intersection Baae Future Change • Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in IA3 Veh C ZAS Veh C # 6 Bth & Barker A 1.2 0.000 A 1.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 7 3prague 6 Barker A 2.8 0.356 A 3.6 0.448 + 0.092 V/C # 8 Appleway b Barker B 14.9 0.360 B 14.0 0.485 -0.832 D/V # 10 WB Ranps 6 Barker C 2.1 0.000 C 2.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 22 3prague & Appleway D 3.5 0.000 D 3.8 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 30 BARKER/EB I-90 RJQ1P3 B 1.8 0.000 C 2.1 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ # 55 3prague & Long A 1.3 0.000 A 1.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Traffix System version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ . . . a:~ . . . .y n Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:10 Page 5-1 'I*IJRTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT AM PFrAK ~ Lev+el Of Service Caaputation Report 1994 KCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volie Alternative) *,t*t*****t,~*,r*w~w*t*t*tf**~tr~r*t***~t*f***~►**~+~~*~,t*,ttr****trtt****~t~r*,t*rr~***~t,r,t~►« Intersection #6 8th b Bazker tt:,►*ws********:f~r***~r**,►*r►,r*r►,►*,r,~,r****:**w**,r***w**:,r**,r,~*******,rw***~**w*~e,►*** Average Delay (aec/veh) : 1.3 Worst Case I,evel Of Service: A *,t*********~r~r*wr*********,t*::~s*~~*~e*t**********,~***,►*,r~***t**~*,r**~~r*,t***~rtr~,t,►,► Approach: North Hound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound . Mov+ement : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 3top 9ign Rights: Include Include Include Include I,anes: 0 0 1! 0- 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 38 2 13 26 0 3 0 4 5 0 17 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Initial Bse: 2 39 2 13 27 0 3 0 4 5 0 18 Added Vol: 0 62 0 7 22 4 15 0 0 0 0 19 Initial Fut: 2 101 2 20 49 4 18 0 4 5 0 37 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 PHF Vollmtie : 3 125 3 25 60 5 23 0 5 6 0 45 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Final Vol.: 3 125 3 25 60 5 23 0 5 6 0 45 Adj us ted Voluine Module : Grade: 0% 0$ 0$ 0$ % Gycle/Cara : 20oc IotXoc >ooos .1-OCXoc XHDCc xxXc xooc J1-ocKt . $ Truck/Comb: Doocx XooQC 3342ooc Xooc XMos DO= XQOS xDocx FG'E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : x>ooc Xooc Xooc x0otx XXocx XK3os ~ocos XXoQc Trck/Cab PCE : Xsxx xKXc >0oc Xxcoc Xooc xx= • ~oooc XKXs Adj Vol.: 3 125 3 28 60 5 25 0 6 7 0 50 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/8) : 30 NPH « MoveUp Ti.me : 2.1 xoooc xocxoQC 2.1 xocaoc xooQSx 3. 4xooQC 2.6 3. 4xooQC 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xoQat xootxx 5.0 xxxx xocooc 6.5 xxxx 5.5 6.5 xoQC 5.5 ------------I Capacity Module: . Cnflict Vol: 65 xo~os xoooc 127 xxxx xooocx 239 xooos 62 219 xoooc 126 Potent Cap.: 1596 xxxx xooooc 1491 xoooc xooocx 770 xooc 1287 791 xoooc 1196 ' Adj Cap : 1.00 xoooc xooooc 1.00 xxxx xxxxc 0.94 aoooc 1.00 0.98 xoaoc 1.00 Move Cap.: 15 9 6xaoc xoQOOC 1491 x)ooc xooQOC 7 2 6xoooc 1287 775 xoooc 1196 ------------I Level Of Service Module : 3 tapped Del : 2. 3xoocx xxxxoc 2. 5xoooc xooooc 5.1 xxxx 2.8 4. 7xoooc 3.1 IAS by Move: A * * A MQVement: LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT ~ 3hared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xmcoc xooQC xxxx xooooc xcoQC 790 >oooos ~oosx 1120 >Doooc 3hrd 3 tpDel : =ooc -ooQC xxoooc xmQCx xooc ~ooocc >ooooc 4.7 ~oooc x=ooc 3. 4 >oQOOt 3hared I,OB: ~ * * * * * * A p, * AprproachDel: 0.0 0.7 4.7 3.3 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:10 Pag+e 6-1 T[TftTZE CREEK AI,TERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT AM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Coniputation Report 1994 HCM 4-Way. Stop Method (E1uture Vol-me Altemative) **,t*~r*,t,t,ttt►#,t:~#wf~►~*,t~►w**:~f,t****f~~:t::t*ft:~r:*,rw~trs~►~r~r**,t,ttrs,r::**,r***,t~*,rt*,r* Intersection #7 3prague b Barker • *~r,►*****s****,r,r**ts►*~********,rtt*****~r**~r**~►**w:~*~:t:+r:~►:,t**~►,►:,rt*~:*~►**t~*,r*,► Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.448 Loss Time (sec): 6 Average Delay (aec/veh): 3.6 Optisaal Gycle : 0 I,evel Of Service : • A ::*t*,r***w***~****tt►*,►*~~~,t*,t*,r*#**#*,rtwf*,r****,r*w***~r~r:*,rw*,r*,rww*,►**ww•ww,►*w*** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Weat Bound Mov+ement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop 9ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Righta: Include Include Includ,e . Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volt- Module : Base Vol: 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 24 12 8 48 108 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 'PaeaerHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 Added Vol: 0 96 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 24 199 6 11 73 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 PHF Vollmde: 27 220 7 13 83 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 220 7 13 83 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 PG'E Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IEF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 27 220 7 13 83 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 11 ---------------11 Saturation Flow Module: 9at/I,ane: 767 767 767 683 683 663 512 512 512 429 429 429 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00:_1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.11 0.86 0.03 0.12 0.77 0.11 0.26 0.49 0.25 0.05 0.29 0.66 Final 3at.: 82 664 21 82 525 76 135 252 126 20 125 284 ------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/sat: 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.45 0.45 0.45 Crit Moves: ***t +r,~:,r ~r*,~w ------------I I,ev+el Of Service Module : • Delay/Veh: 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 3.5 3.5 3.5 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 IAS by Move: A A A A A A A A A B B B wt*1F**,tl,t*!Aw*~******t~trt,t*t*f*!***tr*~A,t,tt,t*,t***tt,t:*:tr****wt**trli*!r**t*,tlrr,tltr~* Traffix 8ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eag . , . Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:10 Page 7-1 TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT • AM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Camputation Report 1•994 HCM Operations Method (Eliture Volume Alternative) • *~~►~►,~*******+r*****:tr***~,►,r*,r~f**~**tr*~~***,t******,r**,r*,r,r*,t*:*,~,►**~**~~r***,rr►,r*,r* Interaection #8 Applemay 6 Barker • **,rtt,►~t*t,c:*~r:*+r***:+r**,►,►****,►*,r*******rr,r,►,►***~**x~~*t::t,►~*~*********,►:t,r,r+~*** Cycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.485 I.oss Time (aec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh) : 14.0 ~ Optimal Gycle: 39 . Level Of 3ervice: B ~*,r*t**~r*~r~r~,t*rr,ri*,t,►*+t*+►*~r*~r~r**~rrt***~r*~#::*~~***,~~**,r**,►w*:***t+r*,c*****,~*#f~r**,~,► Approach: North Bouad 8outh Bound East Bound West Bound Mavement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected . Rights: , Include Includ,e Includ.e Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ------------I ---------------if Voltane Mcdule : Base Vol: 44 168 22 5 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1:03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 45 173 23 5 50 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 Added Vol: 10 64 22 7 23 7 2 0 2 8 0 2 Initial Eut: 55 237 45 12 73 113 58 215 13 31 147 5 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ PHF A,dj: 0.76 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 PHF Volie: 71 305 58 15 94 145 74 277 17 39 189 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 71 305 58 15 94 145 74 277 17 39 189 7 FCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IrLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 Fina1 Vol.: 71 305 58 15 94 145 74 291 18 39 199 7 9aturation Flow Mcdule: Sat/I,ane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjuetment: 0.72 0.72 0.72 '0.74 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanea: 0.16 0.71 0.13 0.06 0.37 0.57 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 1.93 0.07 Final Sat.: 224 964 183 83 519 800 1805 3543 219 1805 3671 129 ------------I ---------------II I Capacity Analyaia Module: Vol/3at: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.05 0.05 Cri t Mov+es : + * * rt * +r ~ tr * Green/Gycle: 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.09 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.12 0.12 Volle/Cap: 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.45 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.45 0.45 ------------I Level Of 3ervice Module: Delay/Veh: 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.3 4.3 4.3 26.3 22.3 22.3 30.6 24.2 24.2 . Uaer DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.3 4.3 4.3 26.3 22.3 22.3 30.6 24.2 24.2 Queue : 1 4 1 0 1 2 2 7 1 1 5 0 ~►:*~r**~~******f**t,tf****~t~►~***t********~*~,ttr****,t~*~r*~**:*~***rr~r**,r~ttr~►***r***~,r Traffix syatem Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Znland Pacific Eng i Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:10 Page 8-1 TURTIaE CREEK AI,TERNATIVE DEVELOPWNT AM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Detailed Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method Fliture Volume Alternative ,~:*,r,t~**~*~es**,t*s*,r,►~,►~~**~***,r~~******,►*,►~,r*~~r~►*#*~►~*,►,►**~e,►:~t*~►**~**:~~~****~r~ Intereection li8 Appleway b Barker r►~,►**~rsw*~e~*w***,r,r~~r*~~,~*~e,r*w~r~~e*w:,~*~►*,r~►~►***,►**sw,►,►,►~et~e*~:*,►*~*t~~~~e*:*,r,►*,►,t:~** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Weat Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 HCM Ops Adjuated I,ane Utilization Module: I,anes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I,ane Group : LTR LTR I,TR I,TR I,TR LTR L RT RT I, RT RT #LnaInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2' ------------I ---------------11 FiGM Ops Input 3aturation Adj Module: I,ane Width:- 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Aev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnf t Ped/Hr : 0 0 0 0 Exclusiv+eRT: Include Include Include Include $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Caae Module: f(rt) Case: 7 7 7 7 7 7 xxxx 5 5 xotxoc 5 5 f(lt) Case: 5 5 5 5 5 5 1xoooc xooQt 1xoooc xoooc ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops 3aturation Adj Module: Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh A,dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xococ 1.00 1.00 xoocc 1.00 1.00 Bus 3tp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xoot 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj : 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.82 0.82 0.82 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj : 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 xoooc xooQOC 0.95 xoooc xooxx HCH sat Adj: 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Var Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 24LE 3at Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fhl 3at Adj: 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Delay Adjuatment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - signat zyPe : < < < < < < < « < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 wf#t*+~::*~**~,r*t*****:*~~►**:*t***~f~e~►~*,►,r,►,►****~,►w,~***,►+►**,r****t,r***,~~*r~►t*~w,►** Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inlaad Pacific Eng . ~ r. i ~ ~ Fri Oct 6, 1995 06:40:10 Page 8-2 TURTIE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMZI4T AM PEAK Lev+el Of service Detailed Camputation Report (Permitted Left Turn 3at Adj) 1994 HCM Opezations Method Euture Voluaae Altemative ~r►r~*+r*#~***,►*****,r***~,►tr******rr**rr,~,►**s~***,r,r,t*rr**~r~~*rr~r~:t*~**,r*~~,r*~,r*:***,r,~* . ' Intersection #8 Appleway & Barker ~,►~**,►~,►~►*#****wt****s**,r***:~►,►***,r*r►rr*ttr~t*rr**********f,rf:f,t,~,t**,r~*,t,►,r**w~~**f** , Approach: North 3outh East West Gycle Length, C: 90 90 x2ooosX 2CK2ot2ot Actual Green Ti.me Per I,a.ne Group, G: 58.66 58.66 xxxxxx xXDoCot Effective Green Ti.me Per Lane Group, g: 58.66 58.66 xootxxoc 11000= ~ Opposing Effectiv+e Green Time, go : 56 . 66 58 . 66 xoocxooc >onocXoc :Nuraber Of Opposing I,anes, No : 1 1 ~~x Xx3cxxx ' Niuaber Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xootaooc XcXtXot Adjuated Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 71 15 xxxxxx IooocXoc . Proportion of Left Turns in I,ane Group, Plt: 0.16 0.06 xoooooc x30oooc Proportion of I,eft Turne in Upp Flow, Plto: 0.06 0.16 xxxxxx Xooo= Left Turns Per Gycle, LTC: 1.77 0.38 xaootxc x)ootXoc Adj us ted Oppos ing Fl ow Rate, Vo : 254 434 xooooot xooooc Oppoaing Flow Per Lane Per G`ycle, Volc : 6.35 10 . 85 xoooooc McooQc Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xoQOOCx XxDCxXQc I,ost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xotxxoac >otDoocc Eff gm until arrival of left-turn car, gf : 13 . 08 32 . 88 xxxxxx >aooooc Oppoaing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.35 0.35 xoooooc .1<x3ocxx Eff grn blocked by oppoaing queue, gq: 2.60 5.93 xoooooc 3aooKXX Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 45.58 25.78 xoQOOOC IICXooooc ~ Max opposing caze arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 . 0.00 xoooooc Noooooc Proportion of Opposing Thru b RT cara, ptho : 0.94 0.84 xococxot JNMocooc Left-turn 3aturation Factor, fs: Xx_oaoc xX2ocXoc >oooXoos 2oooQX Proportion of Left Tuma in 3hared Lane, pl: K20cooc xMDCXoot '1oaoc3oc ~oooosx Through-car Equivalents, ell: -2.82 5.61 aoooooc >ococos 9ingle Lane Through-car Equivalent8, e12: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx >aooocx Min' Lef t Turn Adj us tment Factor, f-min : 0.04 0.04 xooooos .1130acaoc 9ingle Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.82 0.90 xxxxxx xODoQQc I,eft Turn Adjustment Factor, flt: 0.82 0.90 xxxxxx ~ocxx= *~:+t*:,t~tr*,►*******~**~~*~***:**:***********t***~r*,~~r*,r**w*~►*~e**~***:*~~r~r:,r~r,t,r~*~* Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceuaed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ - , i • , ~ _ : .f.,. , < . . Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:10 Page 9-1 TLTFtTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPI4EPiT AM PF.AK ' Level. Of Service Ccmputation Report 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Euture Volimte Alternative) ~,►*t:*r,t~e~**xf*,r*,r,r**:*:re,►,~s*,r~***t~*,r:~*,►+►*,►,►*,~:****~r*:~,r~,~*,►*,►**~,►*~**t*,r*~r*w Intereection #10 WB Ramps 6 Bazker **rr,t*,t,t~,►+t,►**~t,r,tw,t**#~~t,t~t**~**tr*tte~**~,t*tt~~~~r~tf~*t~f*~*tr*,w,t*,~~*,r****,►*,►****,t Av+erage Delay (aec/veh) : 2.5 Worst Caae Ievel Of Service: C ,r,r**,r:**,►w,t*,t,►******~r***t►*,~*,rrrwf:******,►**,rwws*,►,►~f,►,r~,r,►~►*~~,r*s,r:*****~►,r*~*:,►,►:: Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L-- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II (I II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 3top 3iqn Rights: Includ.e Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 , Vol- Module : Base Vol: 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 8 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PaseerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Initial Bae: 179 149 59 20 143 186 8 16 6 23 25 8 Added Vol: 42 20 0 0 22 26 2 0 6 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 221 169 59 20 165 213 11 16 12 23 25 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . FHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volie: 245 188 65 22 183 236 12 18 13 25 27 9 i Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 245 188 65 22 183 236 12 18 13 25 27 9 Adjusted Volume Module: Grade: 0$ 0% 0$ 0$ $ Cycle/Cars : xoooc ~ooot XXooc .10oot xxooc 3ooot Xooc Xotx $ Truck /Comb : Xoos 210ooc Ioooc xxxoc Xooc XQCx . 20ooc 2oooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1:10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : Xxooc .10OCx aootx 31uooc xXXoc Xooc xx= Xaoc Trck/Cmb PCE : llocxoc XXooc Icooc Ioooc XXooc XoQC 2CKXx XcXX A,dj Vol.: 270 188 65 24 183 236 13 20 , 14 28 30. 10 Critical Gap Mrodule: » Population: 300000 Run 3pEed(N/3): 30 MPH « MoveUp Time: 2.1 xxxx moooc 2.1 xoooc xDooQC 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xoocxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 ------------I 11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 419 xxxx xaooot 253 xoooc xaooc 806 821 301 804 906 220 Potent Cap. : 1083 xoooc xooocx 1299 xxxx xoc)oot 361 405 975 363 365 1071 Ad:) C ap : 1. 0 0xoooc xoooc 1. 0 0xoooc aocooc 0.69 0.69 1.00 0.71 0.69 1.00 Move Cap.: 1083 xoooc xoocxc 1299 xoooc xooocx 246 279 975 257 252 1071 ------------I 11 ---------------11 Level Of Service M,odule: 3 topped Del : 4. 3xoooc xoootx 2. 6xoooc xooooc 15.2 13.8 3.7 15.5 16.0 3.4 LOS by Move: A • * A * : : f * t * * Movement : LT - I,TR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - AT 3hared Cap.: xoooc xoooc xmoc xxxx xxxx xxmoc xxxx 342 xxoooc xcQOC 287 xooooc 3hzd 3tpDel:xxxxoc xoooc xooooc xocxxc xxxx xoooot xooooc 12.1 xxooQC xooxxQC 16.0 xooooc 3hared L03: * * * * * • * C * * C * ApproachDel: 2.2 0.2 11.1 13.9 Traffix Syetem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I.icenaed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:11 Pag+e 10-1 Z'iTRTLE CREEK I ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPM4T ~ AM P'EAK . Level Of 3ervice Computation Report . 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Etiiture Volum►e Alternative) **~~r**~*tr*r***tr,t,t~r******,r***~*~+r+t*~~*,r*,r*~r~**,t~,t*,►w~*,~*~***s*******,r~r~,r******,r,r* Intersection #22 Sprague 6 Appleway , *~,►*****,r**t,r*s::~**,►t*,►t**,r*****,r~**~rt*~~*#*,►*,r,r***~*~*****,t*t**,►,►,►*,r*t,~~,~*,►*** , Average Delay (aec/vah) : 3.8 Worat Case I,evel Of 3ervice: D - *~e*~:*******,tt►*+t~~t****,t**,~*,ttt*#**tr,tf,t***,~***t,r***:s~t**trww~r,t~r,t*:~:**t:*,t*~,t****,t Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound • Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R • Control: Stop 9ign Stop 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Includ,e Includ,e Include Include , Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ~ 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Volume M,odule : Baee Vol:111 1 3 2 1 7 5 315 71 1 375 6 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ' ' PasaesByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 324 73 1 386 6 Added Vol: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 16 0 Initial Flut: 115 1 3 2 1 7 5 329 75 1 403 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.64 0.84 PHF Volume: 137 1 4 2 1 9 6 390 89 1 478 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _i Final Vol.: 137 1 4 2 1 9 6 390 89 1 478 7 Adjuated Vol-t- Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0% $ Gycle/Cars : x0otx xxxx 110oot Xx3ac Noocc 2oooc 310oQC >oQOc $ Truck/Comb: >ooQC Xoooc 20cxx .10oot Xooc '-ooot Ioooc PG'E Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 '1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl /Car PCE : .10ooc 2oQOt 110oQt XXXoc ~QOOC *o= Iooot 2ooot Trck/Cmb PCE: Xxxoc ,oooc 2oKXx 20ooc x~oot 2oooc Xooc "oooc - Adj Vol.: 150 1 4 3 1• 9 7 390 89 1 478 7 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run Specd(E/W): 30 MPH « , MoveVp Time : 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.1 xooQC xooooc 2.1 xooQC xoooQc Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 7.0 6.5 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxxoz 5.5 xxxx xxxxx ------------I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 924 927 240 881 968 242 485 xoooc xxxxx 479 xxxx xocxooc Potent Cap.: 272 313 _1047 290 296 1044 941 xxxx xooooc 948 xxxx xocxxx Adj C ap : 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1. 0 0xoooc xoooot 1. 0 0xoooc xoooot M,ove Cap.: 266 309 1047 285 293 1044 941 xooot xooooc 948 xooc xxoooc I il II--------------- Level Of 3ervice M,odule: 3topped Del: 27.6 11.7 3.5 12.7 12.3 3.5 3.8 xoooc xooooc 3.8 xooot xooot ZA3 by M,ovie : D * * * * +A * * A ~ t Mbwment : LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap.: xoooc xoooc 556 xoooc 583 xooooc xxxx xooQZ xxotxx xxxx xaoQC xxxoc 3hrd s tpDel : ,-coxx xooQC 5. 5 xooQOC 6.3 xsxxs xoox xaaoc -coxooc xaQOC ~occ~s xoooc 3hazed LOB: * * g * B * ~ * * * * * ApproachDel: 26.9 6.2 0.1 0.0 Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:11 Pag+e 11-1 TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMNT AM FFAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Volie Alternativ+e) •~~t,r*~*~**~►,rr►****~***~e*w*~**,t******+r,r,►**,►~r*,rw**w:*s,~*:~,~:***,r**~~r******w,►ww*,~:~ Intersoction #30 BARIUR/EB I-90 FtAmp3 f~~***w*tt***t*t,rrt**:***w**w*~~:*,►*s*,r***~*~f*,t*+r~*fttfr,t*,t,►*****+t****+tw*****~r* Average Delay (aec/veh) : 2.1 Worat Cade Level Of 3ervice: C **+t*r►,tt►**rt,t,t,t,t******r►t,t**tr**tr**t***tr1r~**,ts****:**tr*t:t~~,r,r:*t****t~t**t**:~~:t,rt~ • Approach: North Bound South Bound $aat Bound Weat Bcund Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign Stop 8ign Righta : Includ,e Include Include InclucLe Lanes : 0• 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 • Vo1L- Module : Baee Vol: 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 ~ Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 355 9 47 103 0 83 1 24 0 0 0 A,dded Vol: 0 53 16 7 21 0 9 0 15 0 0 0 Znitial E1it: 0 408 25 54 124 0 93 1 39 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF volie: 0 450 27 59 137 0 102 1 43 0 0 0 _ Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 450 27 59 137 0 102 1 43 0 0 0 _ Adjusted Volume Module: Gra,de: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/cara : Nooot 2oooc Xxnoc X)ooc Xooc 110ocx 200oc >o= $ Truck /Comb : xXXot xxxx . xxxx *#osxx 2oQOt 1oocx XXoc 2ooQt PG'E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PC& : Xooc 30= 2ooos Noooc xDoQC .3-Cocx xXooc Xcxx Trck /Cmb PCE : xOot Xooc 2oooc >oooc x3ooc 1142oot .oooc 30ooc Adj Vol.: 0 450 27 65 137 0 112 1 47 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3pe4*d(N/s) : 30 IWH « MoveUp Time :xooooc xcoQC xooooc 2.1 xxxx xoooot 3.4 3.3 2.6 xoooat xoooc aooooc Cri tical Gp :xxoooc xoooc xootxx 5. 0xxxx xoootx 6.5 6.0 5.5 xxxxx xoooz xDoooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity M,odule: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xooos Xooooc 477 xoooc xooooc 660 673 137 xoooc xoooc xxooc Potent Cap.: xooQC xxxx xoocxc 1015 xoooc aooooc 439 483 1181 xoooc xoooc xoooc Adj Cap: xxxx xoooc xoooc 1.00 xoooc xooooc 0.93 0.93 1.00 xxxx xxxx =oooc . Move Cap.: 20ooc ,oooc 2000oc 1015 xooc 2oaooc 409 450 1181 xooc xoooc xooaoc . - ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 LEwel Of 9ervice Module : 3topped Del:.,oooos xooQC xQOOC 3.8 xoooc xooooc 11.7 8.0 3.2 xcococ xxxx xooooc L03 by Mave: * * * A * * * * A * s * Mcvement : LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap. : xoaoc xxxx xocxxc xcoc xooUC xooooc 409 xxxx xocxxc xoooc xooQC xxocc 3hrd 9tpael:moocc xoQOC moocx xoUOSx xxxx xooooc 11.8 xococ x~oooc xoooc xcQOC xx~ac 9hared L03: C * * R ~ * ApproachDel: 0.0 1.2 9.2 0.0 Traffix 9ystem Varaion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inlan,d Pacific Eng 'v Fri Oct 6, 1995 08:40:11 Paqe 12-1 - . ' i TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT ' , AM PEAK - , Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volimee Alternative) ****:*:'**t******,~x:w*t*wtr~►*~~r,~tr.rww***,r,r**********,t*,t,rtr*****~***~******:*~~r*****,t Intersection N55 3prague 6 Long • ******,t*~r~*,►*,t~~*******,►,t,t~rt,t,►*~******,r*****~►,r******,t**,r~**:~*~****~*+t,r~~,►w***** + Average Delay (aec/veh) : 1.3 Woret Case I,evel Of 3ervice: A *:,r***~w,r:t~►::~~*****+r**~**t*:t**,r*,r,t~t**,rtw~t,tw,r*w*ww,r******~*+~+►,tw~***~*******~ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound , Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R I II I II I 'Control: Stop 3ign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Includ,e Include Include Include ~ ' Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ~ • I 11 ---------------11 Volluae Module : 'Base Vol: 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 , ' Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 Passer8yVo1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 Ad,d,ed Vol: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 Initial E1at: 48 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 43 5 66 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volie: 53 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 47 6 72 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Final Vol.: 53 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 47 6 72 0 Adjuated Vol-k- Module: Graci,e: 0% 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : xooos xxxx XKXoc xxxx Moot Xooc Xcxx Xoot $ Truck /Comb : xxxx *xoooc Xoot .142ooc XQOC 31Cooc 30ooc 2~ . . PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 - Gycl /Caz PGE : XKXX x)ooc xoooc Xoocx >oooc Xooot XHooc aooXt Trck /Cmb PCE : .10ocx ~oooc x~ocx X)= xx= Xocc x)ooc xKXx Adj Vol.: 58 0 27 0 0 0 0 67 47 6 72 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run Speed(E/F): 30 NPH « - MoveUp Time: 3.4 xooc 2.6 xoooot xooQC xxxooc xoooQC xooc xotxotx 2.1 xoooc moooc Critical Gp: 6.5 xxxx 5.5 =o= xxxx xxxntx xxxot xQOC xooQC 5.0 xooot xocxxx ------------I 11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 168 xxxx 90 Xoooc Xoooc aooooc xXooc xxXc Xooooc 114 xxxx xocxx Potent Cap.: 846 xxxx 1246 xooos xoooc xoooot xooQt xooQC xoxot 1513 xoooc xooooc Adj Cap : 1.00 xooc 1.00 xoooc xxxx xooQOC xxxx xooot xxxoc 1.00 xxxx xooooc Move Cap.: 843 xooQC 1246 xoooc xooos xooooc xoooc xxxx xoQOOC 1513 xoooc xoooxc ------------I 11 Level Of Service Module: Stopped Del: 4.6 xoQOC 2.9 xxooQC xooc xxoooc xxooot xoooc xoooQC 2.4 xoooc xoocxoc IAS by Mov+e : * * * w * * ~ w ~ A t * Mov~ement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: x)ooc 940 xocxxc xoooc xxxx xxxcx xoooz xxxx xooocx xxxx xococ xooQOc Shrd 3 tpDel : moooc 4.2 xacoc xooxc xoooc ~ooooc ~ooooc xxxx moooc xooooc xxxx ,ooooc 3hared L03: * p, * * * * * * : * * ApproachDel: 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~r f1_ . • Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:11 Page 1-1 TtTRTLE CREEK ' ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPNENT PM PF.AK FiOUR Trip Generation Report PM P'EAK HOUR Forecast for Zone Rate Rate Trips Trips Tota1 $ Of #I 3ubzone Amount Unita In Out In Out Trips Total 1 MORNING3IDE 120.00 SFDU 0.66 0.36 79 43 122 35.1 ~ Zone 1 3ubtotal 79 43 122 35.1 3 MEADOWVIEW T 40.00 9EflU 0.66 0.36 26 14 40 11.5 . Zone 3 Subtotal 26 14 40 11.5 4 RIVERWALK . 120.00 3FDU 0.66 0.35 79 42 121 34.8 Zone 4 3ubtotal 79 42 121 34.8 - 5 TURTI.E CREEK 29.00 3E'flU 0.66 0.36 19 10 29 8.3 Zone 5 Subtotal 19 10 29 e.3 6 MEADaWVIE'W R 35.00 3EDU 0.66 0.36 23 13 36 10.3 Zone 6 3ubtotal 23 13 36 10.3 TOTAL 226 122 348 500.0 Traffix System Veraion 6.6 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:11 Page 2-1 't'LTRTLE CFtEEK ~ ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PM PEAK HOUR • „ Trip Distribution Report ~ . ~ Percent Of Trips • ~ • To Gatea ~ 2 3 6 7 8 9 11 12 Zone 1 0.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 10.0 25.0 ' 3 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 , 4 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40.0 . 5 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 45.0 ' 6 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 , Traffix system Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:11 Page 3-1 TURTLE GREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVEIAPMENT PM PEAK HOUR Turning Movement Report Vol-ITM%e Northbound Southbound EaBtbound Westbound Total 't'ype Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thni Right Lef t Thru Right Volume #2 3alteae b Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A,ddsd 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 49 . Total 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 49 #6 8 th & Barker . Base 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 148 Added 0 40 0 23 73 12 9 0 0 0 0 13 171 Total 1 73 5 48 132 14 9 1 0 7 0 28 319 #7 3prague 6 Barker Base 12 45 5 76 86 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 442 Added 0 62 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 Total 12 108 5 76 196 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 613 #8 Appleway 6 Barker Baae 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 1320 Added 6 42 14 4 76 4 8 0 6 27 0 8 195 , Total 31 149 36 12 225 180 150 310 27 46 334 15 1515 #10 WB Raaps 6 Barker Base .93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 991 Added 27 51 0 0 20 17 8 0 19 0 0 0 142 Total 120 401 20 12 281 134 50 9 26 27 31 23 1133 #11 Mission & Barker Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 4 55 24 7 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 132 Total 0 4 55 24 7 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 132 #13 24th 6 Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Add,ed 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 ' Total 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 #!14 16th b sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Added 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 To tal 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 #15 4 th b 3u11 ivari Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Total 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Traffix 3ystem Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:11 Page 3-2 TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PM PEAK HOUR Vo1L=we Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Type Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Vol=ne - #16 3prague 6 Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 2 15 0 0 28 0 0 20 4 0 11 0 80 Total 2 15 0 0 28 0 0 20 4 0 11 0 80 #22 3prague 6 Appleway Base 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 1386 Added 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 7 0 10 0 31 Total 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 550 180 3 565 6 1418 , . # 2 5 TRENT 6 BARKER Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Added 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 48 Tota1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 48 ~ #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMP3 Base 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 1020 Ad,ded 0 47 10 4 34 0 32 0 50 0 0 0 178 Total 0 349 46 73 249 0 266 1 213 0 0 0 1198 #55 3prague 6 I,ong - Base 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 13f; 16 8 84 0 269 Added 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 Total 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 23 8 84 0 276 Traffix 3yste.m Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng , . ~ ~ Fri Oct 13, 2995 12:25:12 Page 4-1 TURTLE CREEK . ALTERNATIVE DEVEI,OPI4ENT PM PEAK HOUR ' Iapact Analysis Report ' Level Of Service Intersection Baee Euture Chaage • De-l / V/ Del / V/ in IA9 Veh C L03 Veh C 4i 6 8th & Barker A 1.0 0.000 B 1.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ 11 7 3prague & Barker A 2.7 0.309 A 3.6 0.409 + 0.100 V/C # 8 Appleway b Barker C 16.4 0.463 C 16.0 0.537 -0.397 D/V # 10 WB Raaps 6 Barker C 2.4 0.000 D 3.1 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ . # 22 3prague b Appleway F 5.5 0.000 F 6.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ 30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMPS D 5.9 0.000 E 10.6 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 1 - ~ Traffix 9ystem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng J ' . 1 . , Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:12 Page 5-1 TURT'LE CREEK ~ ALTERNATNE DEVEIAPMENT PM PEAK HOUR .Level Of Service Computation Report 1994 HG'M Unsignalized Method (Future Volime Alternative) **********~**rt**,~tr*******,t~►*~t*+t,r*****:****,►,t**,r*wrr~,t,t*:***+t,t,trr*,t*,r****,rw***~r**k . Iritersection #6 8th & Barker ,rn**,r***,►f*:*f***s****:tf*:tt****~*,►,►,►****,r**s**~,►*,►,r*,r*,r,r****~*:~►*****~**~,►f,r~: Average Delay (eec/veh) : 1.0 Worst Case Levp-l Of service: B *******,►~►******,r,r:**,►s,~,~*+►,►*,r~,►,►,►t**~**:!,►*::*t~t~~►*,►*****,►*~*~***,r*****,►,t****** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound . Mov+ement : L - T - R L - T - R ' L - T - R L - T - R . Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 9top 3ign Rights: Includ,e Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ---------------II I Voltmre Module : . Base Vol : 1 32 5 24 57 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ' PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Hse: 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Added Vol: 0 40 0 23 73 12 9 0 0 0 0 13 Initial Eut: 1 73 5 48 132 14 9 1. 0 7 0 28 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 • PHF Volt-: 1 89 6 58 161 17 12 1 0 9 0 35 Reciuct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -j Final Vol.: 1 89 6 58 161 17 12 1 0 9 0 35 j Ad3usted Voli~e Module: ~ Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cara : >0oc xxxx .10oQC Xooc 20ocx XXooc >otxx Xooc $ Truck/Comb: XXoot Coot >oooc xxXc 2oooc Xocx .1-oooc >00oc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 . Gycl /Car PCE : 310otx .10ocx .10ooc xXXX 30= Xoos XQOC 310ocx Trck/Cmb PCE : =ooc xxotx x~osx 2cooc XoQC "oooc Xooc >oooc Adj Vol.: 1 89 6 64 161 17 13 1 0 10 0 38 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run speed(N/s): 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 2.1 xoooc xooooc 2.1 xxxx xootxc 3.4 3. 3xooooc 3. 4xoooc 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xoooot 5.0 xxxx xxxooc 6.5 6.0 xxoooc 6.5 xooQC 5.5 ------------I II il Capacity MAdule: , Cnflict Vol: 179 xoooc -oocxoc 95 xooc xooooc 339 325 xxxooc 322 xxxx 92 Po tent C ap 14 0 9xooc xooooc 1544 xoooc xxocxx 674 737 aotxooc 6 8 9xooot 1244 Adj Cap: 1.00 xoooc xxxQC 1.00 xoooc xooooc 0.93 0.95 xxo= 0.96 xxxx 1.00 Move C ap 14 0 9xoooc xoQOOt 15 4 4xooot xoooos 629 7 0 2xoatxx 6 6 3xoQOt 1244 ------------I . Level Of 3ervice Madule: 8togpeci Del: 2.6 xoooc xoeooc 2.4 xooQC xxxoos 5.8 5.1 xooooc 5.5 xxxx 3.0 1 L03 by M,ove : A * * A M,ovement : LT - LTR - RT I.T - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - I,TR - RT 9hared Cap.: aoooc xxxx xxxxx xxxx xaooc xooooc 636 xooot xooooc xxxx 1056 xooooc 3hrd 9 tpDel : xxxxoc xooc xooooc xaoooc xoooc xoo= 5.8 xooc -ooocx xxoc>oc 3.6 xooooc 9hared LOS : f * * t ~ g A * ApproachDel: 0.0 0.6 5.8 3.5 ' Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceaeed to Inland Pacific Eng e Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:12 Page 6-1 TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPHZNT PM PEAK HOUR . I,evel Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM 4-Way Stop Method (Eliture Volume Alternativ+e) ,►*~e*,t*,r*~►~,t,t*~,r*,t~t**+~,t,►,►,~**~*,ttr,t**w,r*~:rr*,t*,t,t~,t*,t**+t:~rt***,t****,~*:*~*~,r*~*,r**,r** Interaection #7 3prague 6 Barker *rt*,t,rtw,t~,t*~,t,►**,t::#t***~~~*,ttr,t*~,►***~*t*#,t~+t*:~~~t~*:*:w**r►,t:~►**f::*,t,t,►*,t,t**w** Gycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0 . 409 I,oss Time (aec) : 6 Average Delay (aec/veh) : 3.6 Optimal Gycle: 0 Level Of 9ervice: A ,~w**~r*w~*~,t,►**~***,~*t**~*~~**s~r~t***,t**f*~ts****rrt►**s**~*******,tts~~~*~**t*~*,t~,r* Approach: North Bovnd 3outh Bound Eaat Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop 3ign Stop 9ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Rights: Include Includ,e Include Inc2ude Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0' 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 --11 Volie Module : Base Vol: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 . PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 12 45 5 76 88 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 -Added Vol: 0 62 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 108 5 76 196 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF volume: 13 117 6 83 214 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 117 6 83 214 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 .PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IrLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fina1 Vol.: 13 117 6 83 214 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 11 ---------------11 9aturation Flow Module: Sat/Z,ane: 678 678 676 800 800 800 400 400 400 335 335 335 Adjus toent: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.86 0.04 0.25 0.66 0.09 0.14 0.55 0.31 0.11 0.34 0.55 Fina1 Sat.: 65 583 30 203 524 73 55 221 124 38 114 183 ------------I ~ . Capacity Analysis Module: • Vol/sat: 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.26 Crit Mov+es: ------------I Level Of 3ervice MAdule: • Delay/Veh: 2.1 2.1 2.1 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 2.1 2.1 2.1 4.7 4.7 4.7 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 LOS by Move : A A A A A A A A A A A A *4*,twttr~►t:*~t**,tt►tt:t:*w~trtr,►t~t~*tr:*+r:**tr*,►,t*t**r►***,tf:tt*~**:**,►*,►***t*~******* Traffix system Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng . s Y; ~f Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:12 PagM 7-1 . T[TRTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPI~NT PM PEAK HOUR , Level Of Service Computation R,eport 1994 HCM Operations Method (Euture Vollme Alternative) r,►****+r,r,r***t**~tt***~*******~r*,~***~,►*~:,~~****,~~*~+t*,r*********,~~~r*,r*:**,r~****+►*~r,r Interaection #8 Appleway & Bazker • *~r:*,t,r*w*,r,t*****,t*t►t*w*rt*tr***r~,tw::~*,►+t,►f*:,►,ttt**~,►**::tt~,►~**t*,t*:****,t*+t**~r~t*tr Gycle (aec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.537 I,oas Time (aec) : 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Av+erag+e Delay (sec/veh) : 16.0 Opti.mal Cycle: 43 Irevel Of 3ervice: C ~**,r,r*********,r#**~e~*~rwtr*twt►~t**,t***,►*tt►*******:*,rx*,r*****t*********:,►,►***~*,►:,~** , Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound East Bound Weat Hound Movenent : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 ° Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected ~ Rights: Include Includ,e Includ,e Include I Min. Green : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 i---------------ii--------------- i1 ~i---------------~ I Volume Module : . ~ Base Vol: 24 104 21 8 144 171 138 301 21 19 324 7 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Initial Bse: 25 107 22 B 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 ~ Added Vol: 6 42 14 4 76 4 8 0 6 27 0 8 Initial Eut: 31 149 36 12 225 180 150 310 27 46 334 15 ~ User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 32 155 38 13 234 188 156 322 28 48 347 16 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 32 -155 36 13 234 188 156 322 28 48 347 16 PC'E Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IrIF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 .Final Vol.: 32 155 38 13 234 188 156 339 30 48 364 17 11 Saturation Flow Module: 9at/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 0.14 0.69 0.17 0.03 0.54 0.43 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 1.91 0.09 • Final Sat.: 181 875 215 47 841 676 *1805 3456 306 1805 3594 168 ------------I Capacity Analysia Module: Vol/3at: 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.03 0.10 0.10 ' Crit Mov+es: Green/Gycle: 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.16 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.19 0.19 • Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.54 0.54 ------------I II I Level Of Service Module: Delay/Veh: 8.4 8.4 8.4- 9.9 9.9 9.9 24.0 17.0 17.0 26.3 22.0 22.0 Uaer DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 8.4 8.4 8.4 9.9 9.9 9.9 24.0 17.0 17.0 26.3 22.0 22.0 • Queue : 0 2 1 0 4 3 4 7 1 1 8 1 tr*~~,r,t~~~**rrt*~,~~e**,r**,►,r~**~*r~**~**s~r*,~,►t*****,►***,►::,~**:*~►~****~*~~f~*~r**k,►*** , Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:12 Page B-1 TUR'I'I►E CREEK AI,TERNATIVE DEVEIAPHZNT. PM PEAK HOUR Leve1 Of 3ervice Detailed Computation Report 1994 HCM Operations Method Euture volime Alternative ~►,►~~►,t**trw****rr*****,r*~,►,►*,►**~~,►***,t*~:~~****w****~~►********~r~e**,►,►*,~**:t*:*f:*s*+r Interaection 08 Appleway & Barker ~~rr*,r*,r~,►,►*~►****,►***t*+r*****:~*t**~*~r**:*,►~~,rt**,~*,~,~*,r~**:,►f~r,►,r+r~r**,~~r**,►,►*:,►**,►~ Approach: North Hound South Bound Eaat Bound West Hound MQVement : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 HCM Opa Adjueted Lane Utilization Module: Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 • Lane Group : I,TR LTR I,TR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT IILnsInGrpa : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ------------I ---------------11 HCM Ops Iriput 3aturation Adj Module: Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ Parkinq/Hr: No No No No Bus 3tp/Hr: 0 0 0 0 Area Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnf t Ped/Hr : 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT : Include Include Include InclucLe $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 - 11 ~ HCM Opa f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: f( r t) Case : 7 7 7 7 7 7 xoooc 5 5 aooos 5 5 f(1 t) Case : 5 5 5 5 5. 5 1xccoc xoooc 1xoooc xooc ------------I ---------------11 HQri Ops 3aturation Adj Module: I,n Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Gra.de Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoooc 1.00 1.00 xxxc 1.00 1.00 Bus 3tp Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoocx 1.00 1.00 xooc 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.84 xooot 0.99 0.99 xxxoc 0.99 0.99 LT Adj : 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 xxoc xooxc 0.95 xoooc xoocxc ~ HCM Sat Adj: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IrII,.F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fhl Sat Adj: 0.67 0.57 0.67 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 11 ---------------II II Delay Adjustment Factoz Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 r►***~*~***~::+r**~*~,►::*t~**,r***********~~********rr*,r~**,►**,►,►+r,r,r:**~f*::t~~e~t,►*** Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inlaad Pacific Eng Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:12 Page 6-2 TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPI-IgNT PM PEAK HOUR Level Of Service Detailed Computation Rsport _(Permitted I,eft Turn Sat Adj ) 1994 HCM Operations Method Fliture Volie Alternative ,r***,t~r~*~,►*~t,r****~**~:*~:*:tr***:*~**~r,r*,r,t*****trw**+r**,►:~,r+t****~r**,r*trw*~~**:,t*~** ~ Intersection #8 Appleway & Barker I irletf*1►f#!rlir«A4tir*ir*f*******f~,►!litlt*1r:*ir~r***~*:*wir,t*+r*~**fr**le~1r*******ft~t~lr*!*:::: Approach• North 3outh East Weat Gycle Length, C: 90 90 xxoQOOC ~oo~oc Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 46.54 46.54 xxoooot XooQOOt Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 46.54 46.54 xoQOOOC XooocXoc Oppoeing Effective Green Time, go: 46.54 46.54 xxxxxx xx>Cnoc • Number Of Opposing Lanes, No: . 1 ' 1 xxooQOC ~oo3otx Nwnber Of Lanes In I,ane Group, N: 1 1 xxxxxx X300ooc Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 32 13 xoocQQC .1oo3ooc Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.14 0.03 xxxxxx XQOOX Proportion of I,eft Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.03 0.14 xoooooc XoooQOC ' Left Turns Per Gycle, LTC: 0.80 0.33 xxxxxx Xooooc Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 435 225 xxxxxx XoCc>M I Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Gycle, Volc: 10.68 5.63 xooootx xCooooc Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xooooQC Xooooac Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xxxxxx x3o3ooc E f f grn unti 1 arrival of lef t- turn car, gf : 18.04 26.45 xxxxxx ~30Cz ~ Oppoaing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.48 0.46 xoncooc )oooQCx Eff qrn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 10.07 4.51 xxxxxx >oooooc ~ Ef f qrn whi le lef t turns f il ter thru, gu : 28.50 20.09 xoooosx xXocXoc - Max oppoaing cara arritnng during gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx Xootxx Proportion of Opposing Thru 6 RT cars, ptho: 0.97 0.86 xocoacx ~oooKXoc Left-turn 3aturation Factor, fs : ~ XQ~ Proportion of Left Turris in 9hared Lane, pl: 2Ooosxx 2otDoooc X)ooooc 3100QOOc Through-car Equivalents, ell: 5.64 2.49 xxxxxx Xooooc 3ingle Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xoooooc )oooooc Mirim= Left Turn AdjuatmE*nt Factor, fmin: 0.05 0.04 xxxxxx ~oooooc 3ingle Lane Left Turn Adjuatm,ent Factor, fm: 0.76 0.98 xxxoot 'oooooc Lef t Turn Adj us tment Fac tor , f l t: 0.76 0.98 xoooooc %Cooooc **~►**,t,t,r****~r***,t*******~r,►,►**,►nw**:******w*~~**~*~*******~***f~**~*****~~***,t~** Traffix Syatem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng t .:3. Z.e . . • .o.• t ~ Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:13 Page 9-1 TURTLE CREEK ALTEHIRATIVE DEVELOPMENT PM PEAK HOVR Level Of 9ervice Cozaputation Report 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method '(Euture Vol- Alternative) ,r**,►*,~~*:,~**~~►****t~r*::~*,►*~t*~+t,r,►*,r~*,►,r,r***,r*~t::,r:*,r********~~:*~r,►:*~**,t,r,r****tr Intereection #10 WB Ramps 6 Barker **,r,t,►+t,t,t***rr***t~,►~,r:****,t**,r**,~,t*ff,~t,~,►,t***,►*+t**~*~**tr**::**tr*ww~r,►,r***f*~::*~r*~ Average DQlay (aQC/veh) : 3.1 . Worat Caae Level Of service: D **~**~r,►**#**,r,►~~~~r*,~,r*+r**t~,►*:*~~,~,~,r~►*,r*~r+e****~~*~►**«~r*~,r~~*~r~r,r,r*,~*~*~,r~**f~t,r~** Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound 8ast Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - A L - T R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 9top 3ign 3top 3ign Righta : Include Inclucl,e Include Include Lanea: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Voltmue module: Base Vol: 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserBy'Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial BaQ: 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 Add,ed Vol: 27 51 0 0 20 17 8 0 19 0 0 0 Snitial Eut: 120 401 20 12 281 134 50 9 26 27 31 23 Uaer Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volie: 134 448 22 14 314 150 56 10 29 30 35 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 134 448 22 14 314 150 56 10 29 30 35 25 Adjuated Volie Module: Grade: 0t 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : xoooc xoooc .143aoc ,.oooc Mcxoc xxxx Xoooc Xxcxoc $ Truck /Comb : 20ooc Iococ >oooc xoQS >oooc >0oc ~cooc pcE A,aj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 cycl/car PCE : )oooc Xooc )Oooc xxxoc 3ocJ*roc 3oo« XxQOC >oooc TrcJc /Cmb FCE : 20ooc "oooc Xcoc *Dooc 3a3cc XNocc xoooc xx= Adj Vol.: 148 448 22 15 314 150 62 11 32 33 38 28 Critical Gap M+odule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/8) : 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 2.1 xoooc xooooc 2.1 xxxx xxxoc 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Cri tical Op : 5. 0xoQOC xcxsx 5. 0x)cxx xxoocx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 ------------I 11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Ghflict Vol: 464 xooot xooooc 470 xoooc xooQOC 1026 1007 389 1016 1071 459 . PotQnt Cap.: 1030 xxxx xarxxc 1024 xoooc xooQOC 270 323 880 273 299 811 Adj Cap : 1.00 xiQOt xxooc 1.00 xooot xooooc 0.71 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.79 1.00 Mave Cap.: 1030 xoQOC xxooc 1024 xooot xosxooc 191 254 880 213 235 811 ------------I 11 • Lev+e1 Of service Module: " 3 toppc_~d Del : 4. 0xeooc xxoooc 3. 6xxoc xooooc 26.6 14.8 4.2 19.7 18.0 4.6 L03 by Move : A * * A • ~r tr * w * +r MavemDent: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap.: xxxx xoooc xQOOC xococ xoooc xooooc )oooc 260 xooooc xooc 281 xooooc 3hrd 9 tpDel : xxocx xxxx xoe= =cx= ~oooc xooooc xooooc 21.8 =oooc xoooos 18.8 xmosx Shatred L09: * ~ * * * * * D C * ApproachDel: 1.0 0.1 18.5 14.8 Traffix Syetem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~l • . , ' . ~ r pr1 Oct 13 , 1995 12 : 25 .13 ;,ag+e 10-1 TUR= CREEIC ~~~~}7 e xr~7g~~~{Ti Y}ryZ►FL ~~S~JlS.~i~ 4 w n• 1 L~ i~1~~q~ L' i+ Fl•i tL'aLfK idOL.RiS LeVel Of SeN1Ce Comp11tdt1CT] RepQrt - 1994 HCM [Xasig'nalized Method (Fstvre Vol-tme Altemative} ~ - ~ar~~r*~e~r*~~~~*,~~*~r~r~****r~**~*~~~~a*~#~***~r*~~~*,~~~~~~****~a~#****~~~*~~*~*#*~r**~r*# Interaectic>rs #22 3prague b Appleway Av+erage DelaLy (eeclveh) : 6.3 Wrsrst Case I,evel Uf Servir.€; F ' Appraa.ch : N'arth Houzid Svut.h Baund Eas t Bound Wea t Bound ! Movemen t;_ L - T - R L a T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~ I--------------- I I----- 4-------- 11 11 ----}..v_----- ~ Coatrol: 9top Si.gn stap Sign Uncorktrolled Uncantrolled . RigFhts : Include Irialude Includ,e InclLide La=es: 1 0 o i o 0 0 o o 1 o i 0 1 o 0 1 0 io I volume Moaule: Base Vvi: 85 1- 4 0 0 13 6 521 1.69 3 538 Ei ' Grawth Aidj: 1,03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1a03 1.03 1,03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1,03 1.03 ~ PaseerHyVOl: 0 D D 0 0 ~ .0 0 O 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 89 1 4 Q 0 13 6' 537 173 3 554 6 Addea Vai : 1 a 0 a o 0 0 13 7 v 10 a , Initia1 Put: 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 550 180 3 565 6 iFser Adj; 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 PHF Acij: 0.89 0,89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.09 0.89 0.99 0.89 0,89 ' PHF Volume: 100 1 5 D 0 is 7 615 201 3 632 7 R+educt Voi: 0 0 0 D 4 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 ~ Final Vol.: 104 1 5 0 0 15 7615 201 3 632 7 Adj us ted Valt~e 3rlodtia.le: Crade: 0% 0% 4 ~ 01% t Gyc1elCars : %ocxx atx:~= )DCXX >0= 3=m >0= '°XXX % Truck J C cumb : xxxx ;~o= JoVCX xxxx xxDC€ ~txx xXXx X)ocx PtfE A,dj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.14 1.10 1.10 1,00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl/car PCZ: 3CQM >oooc xD= xx3Cc 30ooc IMDCCX 30cxx Tr ck f Gmb PCE : JCW~= 20= 2=xx >0= XXOoc . 0= Xx= AD= Adj Vol.: 110 1 5 0 0 16 6 615 201 4 632 7 Critiaal Gag Madule; Population: 304000 [C Run 3geed{Ef`FX} : 34 NPH <C . Move[Tp Time: 3,4 3.3 2. 6xoaxxx xxxx 2.6 2.1 xxxx xxxxc 2.1 xxxx xxrcxx C ri ti a al Gp : 7.0 6.5 5-5 xxxxx xxxx 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxootx 5.5 ~x xxxxc _ I __--_---------=-11--------------- Capaci ty Modu.le : cn.fliat voY : 1356 13165 408 x= xxxx 319 63 9 xxxxc 817 NDx -DCKXc Po ten t Cap.: 142 173 860 xxxx xxxx 954 779xacxx xoxocst 625 xx= xogoo€ A3j C ap : 0.96 0.97 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxooc 1, 0 0xxoc x'xxsx M✓ Ye 3/api : 136 169 86V xxxx J1./Yx.i1 954 779 xxxx lWWti 6ta 5 xxxx xW Vf I-----'----r---- I~----irr--------- ~ I rrf~~~~~------ I I r--------a.aatfr Ioe1e1 Of '3e1'ViG2 MDdL1.1.e: StGpped I]El:89.9 21.5 4. 2xxxxx X7{]IX 3.8 4.7 xQOax ]~xx 5+ B]xx]L ?axxx ~ L0 S by Mave: F A A * # B Movement: L'P - LTR - AT LT - L'1'R - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT , shared Cap. : xxxx xxxx 472 xxxx xxxx xiocxx xxxx xxxx xoxxx ~x xx= ax~ooc Shra StjaUe3 : xxxx€ xxxx 7.7 xxcxc moat xtxxx xxxx£ xxxx xxxxx }axocx xxxx xxxxx 8haz-ed LDS H * * * * * * * ~ ApproachDel: 85.4 3.6 0.0 0.0 Traffix Syatem Versjoj~ 6.9 (c) '1995 bA Licensed to In3ast.d Pacific $ng . a - Fri Oct 13, 1995 12:25:13 Pag+e 11-1 TURTLE CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPHNT PM PEAK HOUR Level Of 3ervice Coasputation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Etiture Volisne Altemative) ~et*,r*********,t~,t,r*+t*,t,t**:****t**~,t**,r*~t,t~**********t~e***::~:*:t~r,t*~e~rr*,t,t,►w,►~►,r*,c . Intersection #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RA1-W3 **,~*tf**tt****s*~,t**~*****+r,~*,r**~rt****,r:*~*~*w~,t,r*,~*~~~r~~**~*,r,►*~►***~*****,r*~r*** Average Delay (sec/veh): 10.6 Worat CaBe Lev+el Of Sezvice: E *f,r:r****,rs**,r,►w*~r**,r,r***~*~**~r*~ew**~**::+r*****,t*,r~**tr*te*~**,~:~~r~►t,t~t~►rr,t*,r**~w*w . Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound Eaet Bound West Bound Movexnent : I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R ~ II--------------- Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top Sign 3top 9ign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volt~e Module : . Base Vol: 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bae: 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 47 10 4 34 0 32 0 50 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 0 349 46 73 249 0 266 1 213 0 0 0 ~ User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volie: 0 367 49 77 261 0 280 1 224 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 367 49 77 261 0 280 1 224 0 0 0 Adj us ted Volt~e Module : Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ • $ Gycle/cars : Xocx Xoot 33-0= Xotx XotX 20ooc Xoot xDooc $ Truck /Comb : Xoooc Xooc Xooc >oooc 3343ooc =xx IMooQC >oooi PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : Xcoc 2oooc DoQOC 30ooc NooQC 31-oooc Mooc Xoooc Trc3c /Cmb PCE : XQOt xxocx xXooc Xocx J11o= 20oos 110-txx Xooi Adj Vol.: 0 367 49 85 261 0 308 1 246 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run speed(N/3): 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : xoooc xaooc xQOOC 2.1 xxxx xooQOC 3.4 3.3 2.6 xocxc xoooc xoosxx Cri tical Gp :xcxos xoooc xoocxx 5. 0xoooc xxoosx 6..5 6.0 5. 5xoocxoc xxxx xxxxx ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xoooc xoQCC xxcoc 415 xoooc xooooc 729 753 261 xxxx xoooc >ooooc Potent Cap.: xxxx xoooc xxooc 1087 xxxx xxxoot 401 439 1021 xoooc xoooc xooQCx Adj Cap : xooot xooos xoooot 1. 0 0xoooc xooooc 0.91 0.91 1.00 xoooc =ooc =oQOc Mov+e Cap. : xiooc xxxx xoooot 1087 xxxx xootxot 364 399 1021 xooot xoooc xooooc -------I 11 I,evel Of Service Module : 3topped Del : xooooc xxxx xooocx 3. 6 xx~ot xooooc 40 . 7 9 .1 4. 5 xooooc >ocQC moooc IA9 by Mov+e : * • t A ,r * * ~ A ~r +r w Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - I,'I3t - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap. : xooc xmoc xooooc xoooc xooot xoxooc 364 xxxx =ooc xoooc xxxx =cxx ' 3hrd stpDel : .-ooooc =m ,oaooc xooooc mooc xooooc 41.1 mooc moooc >oooQC )ocxx =oooc Shared IAS : g ~ * * +r * ApproachDel: 0.0 0.9 24.6 0.0 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licen ed to Inland Pacific Eng za~~ CIE LtVE1-'S oF SlERVI , wi . rriloiJT pRp JECT , ~ s ~ . , ~ ~ ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:51 Page 1-1 TtJRTLE CFtEEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK Trip Generation Report . AM PEAK FiOUR - Forecast for - Zone Rate Rate Trips Tripe Total $ Of # Subzone Aawunt Units In Out In Out Trips Total 1 MOfiNa1GSIDE 120.00 9EDU 0.19 0.55 23 66 89 38.0 , Zone 1 3ubtotal 23 66 89 38.0 3 MEADOWVIEW T 40.00 SFDU 0.19 0.55 8• 22 30 12.8 Zone 3 Subtotal 8 22 30 12.8 :t ~ 4 RIVERVV,I,K 120 . 00 SEDU 0.19 0.55 23 66 89 38.0 Zone 4 3ubtotal 23 66 89 38.0 6 HEADC7WVIEW R 35.00 sEDU 0.19 0.55 7 19 26 11.1 Zone 6 Subtotal 7 19 26 11.1 - TOTAL 61 173 234 100.0 Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . ' Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51_52 Page 2-1 TURTLE C'RENK HU2Is%] O[JT WITHGuT PROJECT . AM FEAK " , Trip D3stxibution Regort Percent Of Trips To Gates - 2 3 5 7 8 9 11 12 Sone e-r-- 1 0.0 5.0 30,0 5.0 20.0 5_0 14.0 25.0 3 0.0 10.0 0_0 0.0 20,0 5.0 20.0 45.a a 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40,0 6 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 ,l .1 Traffix Syate~ Ve-raion 6.8 (c) 3995 DA Licensed to Izaiarxd PacYfir. Png I 4 f. . .-,v . Z : r e _ .t S .1' , r Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51.53 Page 3-1 TUxTLE cRF-Ex BUrM OvT wITHOu*r PRoJEcT AM PEA~ Turning Movemexxt Report •Valtme Nort.hbound Southbound Ea.e tbdurxd wea tbovrid Ta tal Type Left Thni Fticht Left Thru Itig33t I,ef t nhtu Right I,eft Thru Riqht Volume #2 Saltese & Su].livazY Baae D 286 25 35 62 0 0 4 0 60 0 167 655 ndded 0 0 Q 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 26 36 Tata1 4285 25 44 82 Q Q 0 0 60 0 193 691 # 6 8 th & Ba.rker Baae 2 .19 2 13 27 0 3 0 4 5 0 18 113 'Added 0 62 0 7 22 0 0 0 0 a a 19 109 • Tota1 2101 2 20 49 0 3 0 4 5 0 37 223 #7 Sprague ~ Bia.arkex Base 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 409 Added D 81 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 ~.0 0 109 Tatal 24 178 G 11 59 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 5TB i . #B Applemay L Baxker Base as 173 23 5 sa 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 e.9e Added 4 55 21 7 20 7 2 0 2 8 0 2 127 Tatal 49 228 44 12 70 113 59 215 13 30 147 5 985 #IO MB Raups & Batker Daae 179 149 59 20 143 185 8 16 6 23 25 8 623 Added 35 19 0 0 22 26 2 0 5 0 0 0 110 Total 214 159 59 20 165 213 lI 15 11 23 25 e 933 #11 N3ssion & Barker Ba~~ D 0 0 0 0 4 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ad.cied 4 5 16 7 2 0 0 0 C] 46 0 20 96 Total D 5 16 7 2 0 0 0 0 45 0 20 96 ~ #13 24th C. sullivarx Baae 6 341 6 15 94 19 93 16 0 8 120 122 644 Aa.aE-ci a 26 a 0 9 0 o o a o a a 36 Tota1 6 367 6 15 103 19 93 15 a 6 120 122 975 #14 15 th & Stsl i ivz= Base- 30 820 3 17 233 58 1Bp 9 11 1 10 -72 1452 Adaea o 26 0 n 9 o o 0 o o 0 a 36 Tatal ~o e46 3 17 242 se ISv 8 11 i 10 72 14e8 #15 a~ ~ Suli~van Base 29 ioeB 30 36 327 22 24 11 3 24 e 58 1660 Aadea o 26 a 0 s o v 0 0 a o o 36 - Total 29 1115 30 36 336 aa 24 ii 3 24 e 5e 1696 r Traffix SYatem tteraian 6.8 (c) 1995 DA LiaQSxsed to Islarsd Paaifia Eag L' 'L a - • pri Aug 18f 1995 09s51:53 Page 3-2 • TCTRTI.E CRErLK HUILD OUT WITHOUT 'PRiOJECT ' • ' AM PKnx -----_w-__________________-__:--T--------____------------..__---_____------------ ~ Vq11me Northboiu`id Sota.thbovnci Eastbound Westbound Tota1. 3ype Left Thru Right Left TYxru Right Left 7hru Rig°ht Left Thru Right Voluree , #i15 Spragu+e & Sulliwan Baee 129 701 156 114 307 151 194 241 59 104 312 147 2589 • A,d.ied 3 23 0 0 9 0 0 4 i G 11 0 5 0 - Tata1 132 804 156 114 315 151 194 245 59 100 322 147 2739 ~ #22 5prague & Appleway ~ $ase lld i 3 ' 2 1 ` 7 5325 73 1 386 B 925 A.taed 0 a 0 o 0 o a a o 0 11 o 15 T~tal 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 328 73 1 397 6 944 .A f - ~ EARKER Ba$e 59 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ 1201 l Adaea 25 a v a o 0 0 0 9 a o o 34 mQtal 84 a 30 0 o a a iss 65 sa $73 a 1315 I 030 Bp,RKER~~ 1-90 RAMPs Base 0 355 9 47 103 0 e3 1 24 0 o a 623 A,c3ded 4 45 15 7 20 0 9 0 13 4 0 0 108 Tata1 D 400 24 54 123 0 93 1 36 0 0 0 732 ' #55 5prague L Zong - Hase 47 0 23 D 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 243 Added 4 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D Total 47 a 23 o 0 0 0 61 41 s 66 0 243 . a , - Traffur System Version 5_ B (c) 1995 DA Licansed to Inlarrd Pacific Eng + . ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 4-1 TCFRTLt CREEK HtTIM OLTT W2THOZJ'fi PROJECT AM FFLAK . Iatpact A37alyisia Report Tevel Of 9er{srice ' Interseation Base Ftxture Change ~ t~elf Vf De1/ VJ in LOS Veh C IOS VeY, C ~ ~ Sth ~ Ba-rker a 1.2 0.000 A 1.1 0.000 + 0.000 vIc a . # 7Spraque & Harker A 2.9"0.356 A 3.5 0.433 +0.07B VJC # 6 Apploway & Barker B 14.9 0.361 B 14.0 4.460 -0. B7Q D/v • # 10 WB Ftaaps & Ba.rker C 2.1 0.000 C 2.4 4 . 000 + 0 . 000 V/C 1 # 22 Spragu~ & Appleway D 3.5 0.000 D 3.7 0.000 + 0.000 Vf C ' # -30 SARI=lEB 1-90 RAMPs B 1.8 0.000 c 2.0 0.000 + 0.000 VIc # 55 3prague & I,orxg A 1.3 0.000 A 1.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ' ~ Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceriaed to inl$rxd Pacific Eng I _ _ ~ • Fri Auq 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 5-1 , TLrRTLE CREEx SUIirU aUT W2THoUT FFOJECT AM PEAK I,evel of Seruice Cozuputation Report 1994 I3GM Uneigna.lixed Met-had (Future Voliaae Alternative) . Intersectioa #6 6th & HaLrker - Average I?eIay (aecfveh) : 1.1 - worst Case Ieve1 Of Service: A srlw#~rA#rt*~9rle##lr~k,r*irf**ir#lr~e****ir*fir~rivirle*lrir#i**~1e#~k~ek***irirar~l*~ir*twsrfk*ir#~~rr~F~~lr*+k#ir Approach: North aovn,d south Bound Eaat Bovnd Weat Boun.d - Plouenven t: Z - T - R L - fi - R L - T - R L - T - R . -__~--.._-_--i--------------- -___----------Y-i~ ________------ii------___------i Cantrol: Ury.contralled Uncontroll%--d Stop Sign Stop 9ign Righte : Include Include Inclu,de Iraclude Lanes; 0 4 1! 0 D 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1! Q D 0 D 1! 0 0 ]-------___-..-r-II --------~I ` voli Modv1e: Base Vol; 2 39 2 13 26 4 3 0 4 5 4 17 Grawth A,aj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1s03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByvoi : o 0 o a 0 0 0 n o 0 o 0 z~~~~ Bine: 2 39 2 13 27 a 3 o 4 5 0 ie . Added V o1: 0 62 4 7 22 D 0 D 0 0 0 19 Irsi tial Pst : 2 141 2 20 49 0 3 0 4 5 0 37 User Acij: 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.04 1.00 1_00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 PxP Aaj: 0.81 0.81 0.e1 0.81 0.81 0.e1 0_e1 0.81 0.e1 0.81 0.e1 0.e1 PHF Vo1ume: 3 125 3 25 64 0 a 0 s 6 0 45 Reduet VoX : Q 0 0 D 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 - Final Vol.; 3 125 3 25 60 0 A 5 6 4 45 , Adjusted Volimie Modi}le: Grade: 01% 0% 0* Qt $ Cyale I C ar s: 10cxx >Dc3oc xP= 30= aCCcx x3= xxxx Mcax $ Truc3[ I Co=b: Jq~= 3oofl{ >D= )0t3sx 20= 30= 10= IoaKoc , PCE Adj: 1,10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 . Cycl l ca.r PL"E : >D= x~exx 3cxn= ]oOCK 30cx 30canc 302QC 1~ Trckf Cmb PCE: 2=x= =a= 1~oc xo= Xax xx:[x ~ooz Adj VOI.: 3 125 3 28 60 0 4 b 6 7 Q 50 CriticaLl Gap Wdule: PagvlaLtion; 300000 7? Rua Speed {Nl5} 30 14PH << MoveUp T iv~--; 2.1 xxxx xxxc+€ 2 .1 xxxx 3. 4 X~= 2.6 3.4 xxxx 2.6 Cti ti ca1 Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5 . 0 xxxx -Doac 6.5 xxxx -5. 5 6. 5 xxmcx 5.5 ---------___-------_--___---11 11 Capacity Modu3e: - Cnf lic t vnl : 150 xxxx >oo= 12 7x= xxx3sx 236 xxxx 60 216 xxxx 126 Poterit Cap.: 1605 xct= xxxxc 1491 x>= xKaoac 773 x= 1291 794 xxxx 1196 Aaj cap. 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 x2= xxxxx 0.94 xxxx 1.00 0.9e x)= 1.00 14ov+-- Cap.: 1605 xxxx --ocooc 1491 x= xxxsx 729 xxxx 1291 777xxxx 1196 , ------------I -------T---------------------- II------_--_------II---------------~ Ievel Of Service Module : S topged De1: 2.2 ~c xxxxx 2. 5x;ac Noxarx 5.0 xxxx 2.8 4. 7~as 3.1 LOS by Move: A► * * p, Mcavemex7t : LT - LTR = RT L'r - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA Y RT Shared Cap. : xax= xxxx xxxxc xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 970 xx=c 1121 xxxxc 3hrd S#:pDe3:xxx= xxxx xnn= mo= xxxx -%=xx€ >DcKxc 3.7 xxxxs axxxat 3.4 xaoc= Shared LO S: A A * - AgproachUe3. « 0.0 0.8 3.7 3.3 Traffix 3yste= Yersion 6. B (c) 1995 DA Licensed to YrLland Paca.fic Eag ti • ~ - . ` ~ . % ~up , Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 6-1 TCTRTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK • I,evel Of 3ervice Caasputation Report 1994 HC24 4-Way Stop Method (Ftiiture Voltmre Alternative) ,t**w*re******~►,r*****,t,t**~***tt,t,tt**,t,r**,►+t*~**t***,r,r+r,r~**w~,►**tf*wt,t*t,r****,►t,r~,►#+r , Interaection #7 3prague 6 Barker ~,t*,t**~►,t,►*,t,tr***,r**,~*,r*rr,t*~**~,r~►****,►,►,~,rt,r*~ttt*w*,r,t,t,t****~t***!****~*,r,t**,►***,r** Gycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.433 I,oss Time (sec) : 6 Av+exag+e Delay (aec/veh) : 3.5 Optimal Gyicle : 0 I,ev+el Of 3ervice : A *,►,t,t,t*w,t**,r*****~*,t**tr~~+r***t►**,t,►**********,t,rttrtr*,►t,~+t~,t**,r**~,t,t*►~t►**,t,r********* Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound Eaat Bound West Bound M,ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R Control: Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Stop 3ign Rights : Includ,e Includ,e InclucLe Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module : - Base Vol: 23 95 6 11 39 10 13 24 12 8 48 108 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 24 98 6 11 40 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 Added Vol: 0 81 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 24 178 6 11 69 10 13 25 12 8 49 111 User Ad:): 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 _t PHF Adj: 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 0.88 PHF Vollaae: 27 203 7 13 79 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 Reduced Vol: 27 203 7 13 79 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 27 203 7 13 79 12 15 28 14 9 56 127 11 11 Saturation Flow Module: - 3at/Lane: 752 752 752 670 670 670 522 522 522 443 443 443 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00••1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanea: 0.11 0.86 0.03 0.12 0.76 0.12 0.26 0.49 0.25 0.05 0.29 0.66 Final 3at.: 86 644 22 84 509 77 137 256 126 21 129 293 I II II II Capacity Analysia Module: Vol/3at: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.43 Crit Moves• **w,r ***t ------------I If I,evel Of 3ervice Module : "Delay/Veh: 3.3 3.3 3.3 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.2 5.2 5.2 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 3.3 3.3 3.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.2 5.2 5.2 IAS by Mrov+e : A A A A A A A A A B B B . _ *lrtit*trttlr*t,t**~!!*tt~t!***i~*~******,►*!~!:*!ttlA~~r*~****~1r**~**~*ft4*~lr~**~1rl~*~*~+F Traffix 9ystem Yeraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Ialand Pacific Eng . .r - . r' . Fri Aug lB, 1995 09:51:53 Page 7-1 TURT'LE CREEK BUILD OVT WIZ'FioiJ'i' FR4JECT AM PF AK f--___--,-----------,-_,_..--t------....--...._ L2Vi2l of 9eSv1C$ COmsp31't8tY0n RepDrt 'I • 1994 HCM Operations i++ethod (Eutuxe ►Taliaae Alternative) - , **,r*t*~~~~~r~~f~,r,rdr***~r*~r~,r,r~r,r*#~f~w~*~r+~*###*r*,rd~~r~**~~*rr,r*~r~~~***sr~r~~~r*~**~#*~* Int+exsection #B Appleway & Ba.r'ker *,~~****,t~ * ~*,k~tf:#~*~e~~,r~rt~r,r~r*,r*#*+~~*#*dr*,r**~~* ~ t,►~******#~#~,r,►,~~r~*~# ~~~rrr~r~ ~ ~ ~ Gycke (aec) : 94 Critiaal Val. JCap. (X) : 0.460 Loes Time (sec) : 12 (Y#R = 4 sec) Average Delay (eec/veh) : 14.0 Optimati G"ycle: 38 3evel of S-ervice: B . , Appraach: • North BouriLd sauth Bound Bast bouad Weet Bound 2+ove=ent : L - T - R L 'S - R L - T - R L - T - R , 11 1#--------------- -__---_-w--r--~ Cantrol; Permitted Permitted Prvtected Protected Aights : Include Include Irrclude Iaclude Mia. Greer, : 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 . 0 0 Lanea: o o 1! 0 o a 0 1r 0 0 1 0 1 10 1 0 1 1 a - ------------I _______________a_ -----------~I , Yolv~re Ir~lul e: - Base Vai: - 44 168 22 5 49 103 54 209 11 22 143 3 • Growth Rd,j : 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ~~~~~~~ol: 0 o .o o a a 0 o a o 0 0 ~~~ial Bee: 45 173 23 5 50 106 56 215 11 23 147 3 Aa,aea Vol: a 55 21 7 20 7 2 0 2 e a 2 rnatia,7, Fut: 49 229 44 1.2 70 313 58 215 13 90 147 5 U$~r Aaj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PEF Adj: 0.7e 0.7e 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 O:78 0.78 0.7e 0.7e 0.7e 0_7e PHF Vol,64 293 57 15 sv 145 74 277 16 39 1e9 7 Reduct vol: o 0 a a o o 0 o a o. o 0 xeaucea voi: 64 293 57 15 so 145 74 277 16 39 1e9 7 , Pc-z Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 x.oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 rLF Aaj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 - , Fx~aLl Vol.: 64 293 57 15 90 145 74 291 17 39 199 7 ------------I ---------a..--A..----------___-- 11 Saturation Flaw Madul$: ' SatJLaae: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 Adjus tderxt : 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.75 0.75 4.75 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanee: 0.15 0,71 0.14 0.06 0.36 0.58 1t00 1.89 0.11 1.00 1.93 0.47 Final. Sat.: 217 994 193 86 516 931 1805 3554 209 1805 3671 129 I I ~ ~ ~---_R_- ~ Capacity ArYalysin Modttle: Vol/5at: 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.17 0.17 0.17 4.04 0.09 0.09 4.02 0.05 0.05 Crit Mov+ea; #t*~ Gr,eenICycle: 0.64 0,64 0.64 0.64 0.54 0.64 0.10 0.18 0.18 O.05 0.13 0.13 Valume/Cap: 4.45 0.46 0.46 0.27 0.27 0.27 0..42 0.46 0.46 0,46 0.42 0.42 I I R ~ ~ 7~~ Of SerVice M0duJe: DelayjVeh: 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 25.7 21.8 21.8 29.7 23,7 23,7 Ueer De7Adj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 A+djDe-1lYeh: 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.6 4.6 4.6 25.7 21.8 21.B 29.7 23.7 23.7 Queue : 1 a 1 o 1 2 2 7 a i 5 a ***#~*~~*~t~*~~~f*,~~*,~~****,~~r*~*~,~*~}~~~***~~**~~**~~*~~~~~**~►~~~~*~~#~~**~**~** firaffix 9ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Iriland Pacif3c Zng ,J Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 8-1 ' TtJRTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK " Level Of 3enrice Detailed Computation Report 1994 H(M Operations Method Future Vol-l- Alternative • w~r,►*,r,t*t#~r*****f,►tr,t~***,tw,t*~**,►*,r**tettr*w,t,►*~,~*,►:t**,►,►*~wtr**,t,tt~►*,t*,r~rw**~e:~r*,r~,r*,r Intersection #i6 Appleway ~ Barker ****s*,r*,rw,r+r***,t*,r**~e**,t*,r**~r~►*t*~~xt:**~*t*:+t~*~t::t*t~r~,r*:*,►t**,r*,rt~rr,r*~**+tr,~,r Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound Weat Bound M,ovement : L - T - R L - T - A I, - T - R L - T. - R 11 HCM Ope Adjusted Lane Utilization Mpdule: Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group: LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT • #LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ------I ---------------11 HCM Ops Input 3aturation Adj Module : I,ane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Aev Veh: 0 0 0 0 Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ Parking/Hr: No No No No Bus 3tp/Hr: • 0 0 0 0 Area Type : < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cnf t Ped/Hr : 0 0 0 0 ExclusiveRT: Znclude Include Include Include $ RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0 11 HCM Ops f(rt) and f(lt) Adj Case Module: f(rt) Case: 7 7 7 7 7 7 xnoQC 5 5 xooot 5 5 f(1 t ) C ase : 5 5 5 5 5 5 1xxoc xcQCC 1xooos xxxx ------------I II--------------- HCM Ops 3aturation Adj •Mrodule : I.n Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 - Bus 3tp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xoooc 1.00 1.00 xcooc 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.82 0.82 0.82 xoooc 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 I,T Adj : 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 xxxx xoooQC 0.95 xxxx xooooc HCM 8at Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1rII,F Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fnl Sat Adj: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------II II I . Delay Adjuatment Factor Module: Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > signal Zype: < < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > DelAdjFctr: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 ' ****tt*~r,►*s**wt**t*~t~r*::**~*******fttt:*:~e*~*,~*+~:t:wrr*,r,►*:*,t#t**t**~~,►,t*~*t~**,t Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Liceased to Inland Pacific Eng . . • ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 8-2 TURTLE CREEK ` BUZLD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK . Level Of Sezvice Detailed Computation Report (Permitted Left Turn Sat A,dj ) 1994 HCM Operations Method Future Voli- Alternative ~t~,~**,r*~tt.r*:~:~***~*f****~**,r*~r**:****~*:~,~t~►,r,t*~**,►~*rr~**,r*~,►~*f*:**+r**~:#*s~ Intersection #B Appleway & Barker . ,r***~~e***~~r*,r******~***,r,r,►*,r,r,r*,r:*,r:~*~r,tt*,~,t,r****~t*w*~r**~w**w,►***:t**~*~~*:*~~r+► i-`•Approach: North South East West . Gycle Length, C: 90 90 xoooooc 2o3cxDoc • Actual Green Time Per I,ane Group, G: 57.71 57.71 xxxxxx 20ooc~oc Effective Green Time Per Lane Group, g: 57.71 57.71 xxooooc 30om= oppoaing Effective Green Time, go: 57.71 57.71 aooQOOC X2CQOCx Number Of Opposing I+anes, No: 1 1 xooootx 21oooooc Niuaber Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xoooQQC 3CXDoocx Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 64 15 xooocxc xxoosxx - Proportion of Left Turna in Lane Group, Plt: 0.15 0.06 xooQOOC 3o3o3.ot Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.06 0.15 xxxxxx %ooo= Left Turns Per Gycle, LTC: 1.60 0.38 xoocxooc ~0CM3ot , Adjuated Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 250 414 xxxxxx XxoQOOc Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Gycle, Volc: 6.25 10.35 xoaooac >Cx3Cx:xx Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xxxxxx 3o30oQc I,oet Tisne Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xocxooc 20o3ooc Eff qrn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 14.17 32.28 xoooxc Xxoocxoc Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.36 0.36 xxxxxx XXocX00c Eff grn blocked by,opposing queue, gq: 2.73 5.89 xooQOC 2o3oQOc Eff grn while left turna filter thru, gu: 43.54 25.43 xooooxc XXc30ooc - Max oppoaing aars arriviag during gq-qf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx )cooooc Proportion of Opposing Thru & RT cara, ptho: 0.94 0.85 xoocxoz XK2Cxxx Left-turn 9aturation Factor, fa : >CKX30a 21100=xx Proportion of Left Turns in Shared Lane, pl: XXotx= XKXXx.x Iocxoooc ~oooooc Through-car Equivalents, ell: 2.78 4.96 xoooooc .100oxxot 9ingle Lane Through-car Ei u;va,lents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx Xxoocxx Mirimn*+ Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 0.04 0.04 xoosxoc 3X3CooQc 3ingle Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.84 0.92 xoaooot 20aQ3Oc Lef t Turn Adj us tment Factor, f 1 t: 0.84 0.92 xoooxc XOootx ***~*****rr**~t~***t*,r********rr*~~t,►***r*******,r*+r*,t**,r*,►******,r**r►~****,~******~** ~ . Traffix 9yateai Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inlaad Pacifie Eng ~t~- . , Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 9-1 TLJRTLE CREEK , BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (FUture Volune Alternative) ***,ttr,r,t,~*,t,r~~~*~~r****~►**~,r,►t*,t*,t*~***~****:,r~r**w*w**~**,r*,r**~r***t**w**,t**~r**,►*,r* Interaection #10 WB Raaps 6 Barker *w***,►,►*w***~,►~r***~**,~,r,r*~r+►,►,►*,rf*,►,~~~~k*w:~*~~rt****,r*,t**:*t***~►f*r*,►rr*t*~:,►rr*,rt* , Average Delay (aec/veh) : 2.4 Worat Case Level Of 3ervice: C ****,r*rr*,~~,r**~r,r**~w****,r****,r,►*~t~~*~~r**,t,t~*******,►*,►,t*rr*,~*t**~*:,►***f:**,►~***~~ . _ Approach: North Bound 3outh Bouad Eaat Bound Weet Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop 3ign Stop 9ign Righta: Include Include Includ,e Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ~ Volt- M,odule : Base Vol: 174 145 57 19 139 181 8 16 6 22 24 8 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Hae: 179 149 59 20 143 186 8 16 6 23 25 8 Added Vol: 35 19 0 0 22 26 2 0 5 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 214 169 59 20 165 213 il 16 11 23 25 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 237 187 65 22 183 236 12 18 13 25 27 9 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 237 187 65 22 183 236 12 18 13 25 27 9 Adjusted Voltmre Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ ' $ Gycle/Cars : xxxx xoaot Xooc X)= Xooc Xcaoc X20oc 'oooc $ Truck /Comb : xxmc xxxx Xooc >oooc 310oot XoQC »ooc .1oQOc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE : 31oooc =QOC 20ooc xx= .142cmcc 20= "oooc >oooc Trck/Gmb PCE : .142oot xx= Ioooc ~oooc Ioocc .10oos JIoooc ~aooc Adj Vol.: 261 187 65 24 183 236 13 20 14 28 30 10 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 MPA « MoveUp Time : 2.1 =cc x=oos 2.1 xoooc =oQOC 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Cri tical Gp: 5. 0xoooc xooQOt 5. 0xotxx xxxxx 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 ------------I II II Capacity Module: Caflict Vol: 419 xoooc xoooQS 252 xxoc xxxxx 797 812 301 795 897 219 Potent Cap. : 1083 xosxt xotxac 1300 xoooc xooooc 366 409 975 367 369 1072 Adj Cap: 1.00 xocot xooooc 1.00 xxxx xooQQC 0.70 0.70 1.00 0.72 0.70 1.00 Move Cap.: 1083 xoooc xooQOC 1300 xooot xoooot 254 286 975 263 258 1072 ------------I Level Of service Module : _ 3topped Del: 4.3 xxxc xooooc 2.8 xoooc xaooQC 14.8 13.4 3.7 15.1 15.6 3.4 L03 by Move: A * * A * ~ * ♦ * ~ * * Movement : LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap. : ~ocxx xxxxx xxos xooc xoocx =oot 347 mQOOC xoaoc 294 moooc 9hrd 3tpDel:xooooc xoooc xooooc xooooc xootx xooocx maooc 11.6 xoooQC xooooc 15.5 xxxxx Shared L03: * * t ~ * * * C C • ApproachDel: 2.2 0.2 10.9 13.6 Traffix 9yatem Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Enq . C: . Fri Aug 16, 1995 09:51:53 Page 10-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK , Level Of 3ervice Coaputation Report ' 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Etiature Voliune Alternative) , - **,tw*,t~*~,t*w~,r*rt~,r**w**~r,r,r****,r*~~,►*****,r,r***~r,r*,►****~r*****:*w,►*,r*~*~t►*,r******** . Interaection #122 3prague 6 Appleway ~ ~r**rr**:*tr*w,~*,tw*~~,t*,rtr*****:**,t**~***,tt**t~**t~r,trr*tr*,t,t*,►t,►*t►~*,t,t*,t***,t**tt*t~twt,t . . Average Delay (sec/veh) : 3.7 - Worat Case Level Of 9ervice: D r***,r*~*~►**,►**,►***~****~rww**,►rr**,r*xw**:*~***~r,r**,►,r,r~,t*r**~~*~:,r*s,r~,~**t,t*~~,r*,tt►~r Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound M,oveaent : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ~ Control: stop sign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Includ,e Include Include Includ,e Zanes : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 . Volie Module : Base Vol: 111 1 3 2 1 7 .5 315 71 1 375 6 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 - PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •Initial Bse: 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 325 73 1 386 6 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 11 0 Initial Eut: 114 1 3 2 1 7 5 328 73 1 397 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 PHF Voliuae : 136 1 4 2 1 9 6 390 87 1 471 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 136 1 4 2 1 9 6 390 87 1 471 7 Adjusted Volume Mcdule: Grad.e: 0$ 0$ 0% 0$ % Gycle/Cars : xxxx xoooc Xooc XoQOt No= "Ocx 110= XMCt $ Truck/Comb: Xooc Xoot Mooc Xxxot xCoc XotX >ocxx )0oot PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl /Car PCE : 2o00C Xooot )ooot >ooQt XQOC xxxx Xoc{ Xoot Trck/Cnb PCE : Xooc x~ XOCx ~oooc x~ 20ooc 330ooc Xoooc Adj Vol.: 149 1 4 3 1 9 7 390 87 1'471 7 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Rvn 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « . MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 2.1 xxxx xoonoc 2.1 xxxx xoncxx Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 7.0 6.5 5.5 5.5 xoooc xoocxx 5.5 xxxx xooooc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 916 919 238 874 958 239 478 xxxx xxooc 476 xxxx xoooc Potent Cap.: 275 316 1049 292 300 1047 949 xxxx xxotxx 951 xooot xocxxx Adj Cap: 0.98 0.99 1.00 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 xcoot xooQCC 1.00 ,xxoc xcxxx Move Cap.: 269 313 1049 288 296 1047 9 4 9xootx xoooat 951 xxxx xooooc ------------I I,ev+el Of Service Module : 3 topped Del : 26.8 11.6 3.4 12.6 12.2 3.5 3. 8xoot xooooc 3. 8xoooc xtxxx IAS by Mov+e : D * * * * * A * * A * * Mcvesnent : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT shared Cap.: xocxoc xoooc 660 xooQC 588 xoo,= xxxx xooos xooooc xoooc xoooc xooooc 3hrd 9tpDe1: xoQOOC moot 5. 5 x=oc 6. 3 xooooc xooooc xxxx xocxooc xxococ xooc mooot Shared L03 : * * E * g * * * * * ApproachDel: 26.1 6.2 0.1 0.0 Traffix Systesa Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . z'. W . . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 11-1 TiJRTLE CREE K BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT AM PEAK Lev+el Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Voline Alternative) ' *,ttr**,tt,t**trtrf***,r~r,t:*,r,►r~tt***~t**w*,t***wtrre*,►~r*,t*,t,r~►**w*:tr~r,►*:*:,r~#**,trr*f*,ttr*~t**,r Intersection #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMPs **rr********,►*tt,t,t*****t,t,t*,t**~*,tt*~►**,t**r,t*,t**,t,►*t*,►rr*~**~*********tr***:***,tw*** Averag+e Delay (aec/veh) : 2.0 Worst Caae I,evel Of 3ervice: C . *****,tr***~rwt,~,►****,r**,r,r,r*~**~,ttrtr~*,t*,t+r*t**,t****,t,►tr*ww*,t~**t~r***,r**,tw,r**r,t*****~ . Approach: North Hound 3outh Bound Eaet Bound West Bound Mov+ement : I, - T - R L - T - R I. - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top 3ign 3top 3ign Rights: Include Includ,e Includ.e Include Lanes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Volt~e Module : Base Vol: 0 345 9 46 100 0 81 1 23 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByVol: 0 0 •0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 355 9 47 103 0 83 1 24 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 45 15 7 20 0 9 0 13 0 0 0 Initial E1it: 0 400 24 54 123 0 93 1 36 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volwae: 0 441 27 60 136 0 102 1 40 0 0 0 - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 441 27 60 136 0 102 1 40 0 0 0 A,djuated Vol-lmke Module: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Cycle/Cars : Xoooc Xooc >oooc XQOC x=oc 3-oooc XXooc X>= % Truck /Comb : 2oooc Ionoc xxotx XotXX xxoot X~ x0oot 30ooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : >o= 31ooot Xtxoc 20otx aaoos 2DsCs Naoot 110ooc Trck /Cmb PG'E : 300cx 20oot Xoot 20ooc .1oooc XXoot Xooc Xxooc Adj Vol.: 0 441 27 65 136 0 112 1 44 0 0 0 _ Critical Gap M,odule: » Population: 300000 Rua 8peed(N%S): 30 WH « MoveUp Ti.me:,,ooooc xooQC -oocaQC 2.1 xxxx soosxc 3.4 3.3 2.6 xooocx xooct xoQOOc Critical Gp:xxocx xoooc xootxx 5.0 xxxx xxocx 6.5 6.0 5.5 xooooc xoooc xootx ------------I 11 Capacity Mcdule: Cnf 1 i c t Vo l: xxxx xxxx xooooc 4 68 xoooc xooooc 650 663 136 xxxx xxxx xoocxx Potent Cap.: xooQC xooQC xoocQt 1026 xoooc xooooc 445 489 1181 xoocc xococ xoaaoc Adj Cap: xxxx x2= xoooot 1.00 xooc xoocxc 0.93 0.93 1.00 xoooc xoooc =oQc Movie Cap.: xooc x= 2Doooc 1026 acoos x~oaoc 414 456 1181 xooc xxxx xxxxoc ------------I _ I,evel Of 3ervice M,odule: - stopped Del:moooc xxxx =oocc 3.7 >oQOC moooc 11.5 7.9 3.2 xooooc xocxoc moQOc LOS by Move: f w * A * ~ w * A : Movement : LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT 9hared Cap. : xooc xoooc xocoQC xxxx xcoot xooooc 415 xxxx xcQCflc xxxx xoooc ~ooooc 3hrd stpDel:xcoooc xooQC moooc xcooc xoooc 3oooQC 11.6 xxxx ~oc >ccoQC aoooc xoooc Shared LOS : * * * * * C * * * * * ' ApproachDel: 0.0 1.2 9.2 0.0 Traffx 9yatem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Pacific Eng •y Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:51:53 Page 12-1 - TURTLE CREEK ' BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT ' AM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Conputation Report , •1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Volum Alternative) • Intersection #55 3prague b Long ' rr~r**~,r**,t,t*,r,►*,r,t**,r+r***#*~es**~,tte~,►,r****~,t*****,t~t~~*,r,t*,r****,r***,r~*,~***~t*:~te~r*,r* Average Delay (aec/veh) : 1.3 Worst Case I,evel Of 3ervice: A . ~r,r**,r~,►*rr,~~**~~,►**~**~r*,r~,►*~***rr~►******:********t*t*****~***,►*:~,~**ft,r**t***~r**~ Approach: North Bound 9outh Bound East Bound Weat Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R -II_ _ I ---3top - Sign ---II--- 3top 8ign ---II_- Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Control I Rights: Include Include Includ,e Include Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 i 11--. ` Voli~e Module : Base Vol: 46 0 22 0 0 0 0 59 40 5 64 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 , PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 47 0 23 0 0 0 0 61 41 5 66 0 Uaer Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 PHF Volim►e: 52 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 45 6 72 0 R,educt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina1 Vol.: 52 0 25 0 0 0 0 67 45 6 72 0 Adjusted Voliaae M,odule: Grad.e: 0$ 0% 0% 0% $ Gycle/Cara : xoQOC xxxx XoQC 3oooc xxXot xxxc ?°oX >°°cx $ TrucJc /Comb : ,ooQC >oooc >oCKX xxxx ~oooc ~ooc 2ooQS FG'E Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl /Car PCE : xoQOC x)oc >QQOC ~ooos >oooc xxXoc 3ooQS >oooc Trck /G7ab PCE : xDotx )ocxx Xooc ~c xxxx Xoac xxxx soooc Adj Vol.: 57 0 27 0 0 0 0 67 45 6 72 0 Critical Gap Module: » Papulation: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « M,ov+eUp TiIIee : 3.4 xxxx 2.6 xxocxc xxxx mccmx xxoooc mcxc =QOC 2.1 xxxx =oQc Critical Gp: 6.5 xooc 5.5 xooooc xooc xooooc xoaxooc xooQC xoooac 5.0 xxxx xoocxc ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 167 xxxx 89 xxxx xxxx xooooc xooot xxxx XXo= 112 xoooc xoooc Potent Cap.: 847 xxxx 1249 xococ xooot xooooc xxxx xxxx xoooot 1516 xoooc xxocxx Adj Cap: 1.00 xoooc 1.00 xxxx xoooc xooooc xooos xooc xxo= 1.00 xooQC xooocx Move Cap.: 844 xaooc 1248 xooQC xxxx xoctxc xxxx xxxx xooooc 1516 xoQCS xooooc , ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 I,evel Of Service Module : 3 topped Del : 4.5 xooQC 2.9 xoooc xoocc xoooxx xxxocx xoQCC xoogcc 2.4 xxxx xoooa ~ LOS by Move: * * * * * ~ * * * A * * Movement : I+T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap . : xoooc 942 xooooc xoooc xooc xocooc xocxoc xoot xoocxoc xooa x°°°t x°°°°t 3hrd 8 tpDel : Xooocx 4.2 xooooc xoQOOC xoooc xcooxx xoooot 'xxoc IoooQC >coQOS 2ooQC >oocxx 3ha.red L09: * A * * * * * * * t * * ApproachDel: 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . . . • ► , , • s Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:01 Fage 1-1 TLTRTLE G'REEI{ - BUILD (]CTP WITFi4LTi' PADJZCT ' PM PEJiK ~ Trip Ge-neration R,epart pM. vF~x Forecast for , Zone Rate Rate TripB Tr].ps Tota1 % Of N Subzone Amount Units In aut IrY out Trips Tota1 • i I NDRZ3INC5IDE 120.00 SFDSJ 0.66 O. 36 79 43 122 38.2 Zcaaxe 1. Subtatal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 43 122 38_2 3 MF.ADOWVIEW T 40.00 SFDU 4.55 0.36 25 14 40 12.5 _ Sone 3 Subtota1 25 14 40 12.5 4 RNEAWALK 120.00 SFDU 0.66 0.35 79 42 121 37 _ 9 . Zane 4 Subtotal 79 42 121 37.9 6PYAQOWV= R 35 . 00 SFDTJ 0.66 0.36 23 13 36 11.3 Sorse G Subtotal 23 13 36 21.3 ~ ~ ---_________--a_----------------------------------------------------------____---- TOTP.L 207 112 319 100.0 ~ ~ - J ~ Traffix System Yersian 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Lzcerssed to Iailand Paci,fic Eng ~ . _ . ~ . 'r t' Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 2-1 ~ TiTRTLE CREEK BUIZ.D OUT WITHOUT PROJECT ~ . PM PEAK . Trip Distribution Report Percent Of Trips To Gates ' 2 3 6 7 8 9 11 12 Zone ~ 1 0.0 5.0 30.0 5.0 20.0 5.0 10.0 25.0 ~ 3 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 • 4 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 40.0 6 , 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 5.0 20.0 45.0 Traffix Systesa Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 3-1 TURTLE CREEK • BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK - ' Turning Movement Report l Voltm~ Northbound 3outhbound Eastbound Westbound Tota1 ~ Type Left T'hru Right Left Thru Right I,eft Thru Right Left Thru Right Voltm~e #2 Saltese b Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Acided 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 49 Tota1 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 49 #6 Sth 6 Barker ~Base , 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 148 Added 0 40 0 23 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 149 ' Total 1 73 5 46 132 2 0 1 0 7 0 28 298 #7 Sprague & Barker Base 12 45 5 76 88 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 442 Added 0 53 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 149 Total 12 98 5 76 184 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 591 ~ ~ #8 Appleway 6 Barker Base 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 1321 Add,ed 3 36 14 4 66 4 8 0 5 26 0 8 173 'Total 27 143 36 12 214 180 150 310 27 45 334 15 1494 #10 WB Raa,ps 6 Barker Base 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 991 Add,~.~d 23 51 0 0 19 17 B 0 18 0 0 0 135 Tota1 116 400 20 12 280 134 50 9 25 27 31 23 1126 #11 Miasion & Barker I Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ Add,ed 0 3 55 24 6 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 131 Tota1 0 3 55 24 6 0 0 0 0 29 0 13 131 #13 24th 6 3ullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 17 O 0 32 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 49 Total 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 ~ #14 16th & Sulliv-an ~ Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 To ta1 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 #15 4th & suliivan ' Baae 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Total 0 17 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 I Traffix Syetem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng 1 J Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 3-2 • TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK Vollune Northbound Southbound Eastbound westbound Tota1 Type Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Lef t Thru Right Left Thru Right Volume . . #16 Sprague & Sullivan Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 Added 2 15 0 0 28 0 0 13 4 0 7 0 69 Total 2 15 0 0 28 0 0 13 4 0 7' 0 69 , #22 Sprague 6 Appleway Base 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 1387 , : Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 7 0 20 Tota1 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 550 173 3 561 6 1406 ' #25 TRENT S BARKER Base 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Add,ed 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 46 Total 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 46 #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMP3 Base 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 1020 Add,ed 0 42 10 4 33 0 32 0 42 0 0 0 162 Tota1 0 344 46 73 247 0 267 1 205 0 0 0 1182 #55 Sprague ~ Long - Base 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 8 84 0 269 Added 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 8 84 0 269 ~ I ~ J Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng • J Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:56:03 Pag+e 4-1 TURTIE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PF.AK . Inpact Analyeis Report ' - Level Of 3ervice ' - Intersection Baae Future Chang+e Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in LOS veh c LOS veh c M 6 8th 6 Barker A 1.0 0.000 B 0.9 0.000 + 0.000 V/C # 7 3prague & Harker A 2.7 0.309 A 3.5 0.398 + 0.089 V/C # 8 Appleway 6 Barker' C 16.4 0.464 C 16.0 0.530 -0.418 D/V , ~ 10 WB Ramps 6 Barker C 2.4 0.000 D 3.1 0.000 + 0.000 V/C Y 22 3prague b Appleway F 5.5 0.000 F 6.0 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMP3 D 5.9 0.000 E 10.3 0.000 + 0.000 V/C 41 55 3prague 6 Lcng A 0.5 0.000 A 0.5 0.000 + 0.000 V/C ~ 1 0 _I Traffix 8ystem Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng - . . - . . • Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:56:03 Page 5-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK ~ Lev+el Of 3ervice Ccmputation Aeport 1994 HCM Unaignalized Method (Base Volie Alternative) ' . ~;e~. . ~tlrtF***tF*tt:lrsrtwtr*!**,t***~*tM~tr~tt~*tt,t*w*tt~tt**!!rw**!!r**ft~r**w*ttFfr*t**tr*t!***~tit1***lrtr • y. . Intersection #i6 Bth & Barker ****~r*****~r*,t**~t+t*****+tt*ft:f*,rt~,t*~tt~,t~*~*,rt***~t*,►*,r,r*+~t~e*trt*trt+tt**,t,t~t~*,r*** Average Delay (sec/veh) : 1.0 Worat Case Level Of Service: A ~ ****,►:*#**t+r,r::t*,►******~,r~~r,r*~t********tr*~****,►*ttr~*****t~r**,►,t***~*~**,r,rt::*~r*** ~ Approach: North Bound 8outh Bound East Bound Weet Bound Movement : I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R • Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop 3ign 3top Sign ~ Rights: Includ,e Includ,e Include Znclude Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I Volie Module : Base Vol: 1 32 5 24 57 2 0 1 0 7 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ~ PasaerByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Initial Bse: 1 33 5 25 59 2 0 1 0 7. 0 15 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 PHF Volu1 40 6 30 72 3 0 1 0 9 0 19 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fina1 Vol.: 1 40 6 30 72 3 0 1 0 9 0 19 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 - Adjusted Voluime Module: Grade: 0$ 0% 0% 0$ $ Gycl e / C ar s : xxxx xx= XcXoc 2osxx XcXoc .1oooc XcXoc Xcxx $ Truck/Comb: 2otxac Xooc 31-QOOC Xooc Xooc 2oooc Mocx XoQc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00. 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE: xx= xxxx 2oooL 210ooc >0oc Xcxx xX~oc XoQc Trck/Cmb PCE : Xocx xxxx Xsxx xxxx xQoc >oooc ~ooflt Motx Adj Vol.: 1 40 6 33 72 3 0 1 0 10 0 21 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap Madule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 IdPH « ' MaveUp Time : 2.1 xooc xm= 2.1 xxxx ,ocxoc xocxQC 3.3 xoooQC 3.4 xooos 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xocxxoc 5.0 xoooc xxxxt xxxxx 6.0 xxocx 6.5 xxxx 5.5 11 11 Capacity Madule: Cnf l i c t V o l: 74 xxxx xocooc 47 xxxx =o= xooQC 151 xoooQC 14 93o= 43 Po tent Cap.: 1580 xxxx xxooc 162 9xxoot xooQOC xxxx 909 xx~ 869 xxxx 1316 • Adj Cap: 1.00 xooot xxooot 1.00 xooQt xooot xxxx 0.98 xooQOt 0.98 xa= 1.00 Mrov+e Cap.: 1580 xxxx xxo= 162 9xoooc xxxoc xxxx 88 9xxxxoc 853 xoooc 1316 ~ ------------I ---------------11 11 Level Of service Module: 3topped Del: 2.3 xocxos xxoocc 2.3 xoooz xxxxx xoxxc 4.1 xxxxc 4.3 xoooc 2.8 LOS by Move: A t * A * * * A * + ,r * Movement : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTA - RT LT - I,TR - RT I,T - LTR - RT 9hared Cap. : xxxx xococ xooooc xoooc xooec >ooocx xoooc xaooc =OOC xxxx 1122 >ooooc . Shrd 3tpDel:,,ooooc xooQC xcooc 2oooas xxxx ,ooQQC >aoocx xoooc xxxxoc xooQOC 3.3 mQOOc Shared I,03 : * * * ♦ * " : * ~ * * A * ApproachDel: 0.1 0.7 4.1 3.2 Traffix 3ystem Version 6.6 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng : . . . _ . •~,c . F_i Aug 18, 1995 09:5e:03 ~age 6-1 7LTR3'LE CREEFL BUILD 04J'P WITHOUT P'ROJECT PM PEAK i,eve1 Df 3ervice Camputatian Repart . 1994 NCM Unsigxialized Method (Future Volu~e ATterrsatiure) ~~r~**,~~~r**.r*~**f,rs~~r~~r~t,~**ff*#*****~rfff*~f~,r~::*tt*##t#ref#t~t~tf:*s~**w*~~~~ft~~f x]'3ter82Cti4li #6 Oth & $3rket ' . irirtt#*a4**ir**!e!M*it~t~#lr~~#t#tik###f#,F###iir~ir#~lski#~~#tik###f##~r#t~##ki#k#!~!rltt~*hFt##dt - . Average Delay (aec/veh): 0.9 - Wora-t Caae Tevei Of Service: ~ ~~tf.~r,r~r,r~r*,rdr~~~sr~*~.~~i~r~*~~~**a~**,r~**•t~•~***:f*~a~*~~**~~:~r~sr~*:*,r~#*:,r*:~** . ApproaolFx: North Baund Sautl, llo=d 11ast Sosand Wrest Hound ~ Mo;eme^ t: L ~ T - R L T - R -L - T - R L - T - R [fi..f,..:---------- ~ ~ Coat-rol: Uncantralled TJrrcorxtrvlled Stop 5~.gn 3top 5ign Ra.ghts : Snclude ZxYr-lude Include Include ' Lasxes : d D 1! 0 0 0 D i! 0 0 0 0 1 0 I} D G i± 0 D ~ _r--__----,.r-..- ! Volt=e Morlu.le : - Base Vol: 1 32 5 24 57 2 4 1 0 7 D 15 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.43 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 FasaerByVol: 4 D 0 0 Q D D 0 0 0 Q D Iriitia3 F3se: 1 33 5 25 59 2 4 1 U 7 0 15 Added Vol: 4 40 0 23 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 Initia1 P1.xt: 1 73 5 48 132 2 0 1 D 7 0 28 tiaex Adj: 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1,00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0,82 0,82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.62 0.62 0.82 0.82 0,02 0,82 Fi3F VQl--: 1 89 6 B8 16l 3 0 1 0 9 0 35 ~ Recluct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 Fiaatl Vol.: 1 189 6 58 161 3 b 1 0 9 Q 35 - Adj ug tecl Yoliuae Madule : Gra,ce: 0P6 oj~ 096 0% ' $ CycleJCars : xxxx xxxx x3Cxx xD= Xcx.x 20= 20craf ~c $ Truck / C omb : xxxx x~ooc _-Icx::~ 30Moc x~xx ~ _ PCE Adj : 1.14 1. oD l. . 0c 1.10 1.00 1.00 I.iD 1. io 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cy c1 / C ar PCE: xx:?m 3OCoc 3DO-K 20ooc A,.Dac 2aKZKX 'atxX 3Ccxx ~ Trck/Cmb PCE : %ocgoX xncx~€ >osx~ 2CKXX 20= >oCKX xs= xx= Adj Vol.: 1 89 6 64 161 3 0 1 0 10 0 38 ~ Critiaa1 Gap M,advle: Populatican: 300000 << Run Speed(NJS) : 30 MPH << MoveUp Time : 2.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxcx xxa-= xxx:xx 3.3 xnxxx 3. 4 x~e€ 2.6 C,ri tical Gp ; 5. ~ ~~x xxx=c 5 _ ~ ~ xxxxx 6.0 xxxaoc 6.5 xxxx 5.5 I II_t-_f_r-_---...._il__-_--___---------------------~ Capac3ty Moaule: - - crflict Vc3: 164 xxxx xxxxx 95 xxxx xxxc xxxx 31B xxxxx 335 xx= 92 P~tent cap.: 1432 xxxx xxaocx 1544 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 7 4 3 xxx~oc 696 xxxx 1244 Atlij cap: 1. 0 0 xx= xx~= 1.00 xxxx xxtx}c xxxx 0.95 xxaoc 0.96 xxxx 1.00 ~ Mave Cap. ; 1432 xxxsc xxxoax 1544 xxxx xxx= xxxx 709 xxx= 670 xooc 1244 --..-______Y-_--_--------------- ~I II i Level Ot Service 3•lradule: ~ . . ~ 8tcpped Del: 2.5 xxx xacgvc 2.4 xxxx xxxxx xxaoc 5.1 xaxof 5 . 4 xx= 3.0 YA S by Move : A * * p, * f ~ $ * # # * Mavement: LT -L3*R - RT LT ~ LTR - RT LT a LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT shaxed Cap.: xo= xxxx avvxxt xxxx xxxx xxxox x2= xxxx xxxxx >m= 1060 xm= 5hrd StpDel:xa~x xxxx xx~ooe xce+aocx xxxx xxxxx xx~= mocc x== ~nsxxoc 3.5 zcc= Sha.red L45: * * * * * * * * * # A * - ApproachDel. 0.0 0.7 5.1 3.5 Traffix 5yatem Version £.6 (c) 1995 DA Lic4naed to xnlanci Pacific Eng _ Pc~ ~ ~ Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 7-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK . Level Of Service Caaputation Report 1994 HCM 4-Way 3top M,ethod (Base Volie Altemative) _ , • *~,t,t~►***f**~***,►tr*~~**tt***,tw,t,r*w*,t,t***,ttr*rr**~~trt**:ftirt*:trlrtw**r►****,tttr,t*~*t,t,tt Intersection #7 3prague ~ Barker • • • *t***wtr:,►,t~t***,t,tt*!r*t►t!r***t****t*w*trf**it4*,t*f*tr***tr*tr,t~~**~:l:~***t::**t►tr*,t*trt* Cycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.309 Loes Time (aec): 6 Average Delay (sec/veh): 2•7 Optimal Gycle: 0 Level Of Service: A *,►,r~,r::*~,►,r*****,r,r:*~:,►,►***,~,r~+r*,r*t**,r:***::,r,►******+~*~e***,r**,rt*:~**:*t,►,r~#***~►r~ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R I+ - T - R L - T - R ------------I 11 ---------------11 Control: 3top 9ign 3top Sign Stop Sign 9top 3ign Rights : Znclude Includ,e Include Includ,e Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ------------I ---------------11 ----------------11 ---------------11 Voltmee Mcdule : Base Vol: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 12 45 5 76 B8 28 14 59 33 9 28 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Vo11nwe: 13 49 6 83 96 30 16 64 36 10 30 46 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ Reduced Vol: 13 49 6 83 96 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NLF A,dj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 13 49 6 83 96 30 16 64 36 10 30 4B Saturation Flow M,odule: ..Sat/I,ane: 541 541 541 676 676 676 478 478 478 408 408 408 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.19.0.72 0.09 0.40 0.46 0.14 0.14 0.55 0.31 0.11 0.34 0.55 Final 3at.: 103 390 4B 26B 311 97 66 264 148 46 139. 223 , ------------I Capacity Analysia Module: Vol/3at: 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.22 0.22 Crit Mav+ea • *t*rr ------------I Level Of 3ervice Module : Delay/Veh: 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 1.6 1.6 1.6 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 L03 by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A !r*~1r*tr~f~tl1***fr~r*~**~******1rA*lrtl~rlt*~i►r►~*~*lrle**ftieltie**:**~f*!r*wir*1r***!r*:t~~*ie*t*1t , ' Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA I,icensed to Inland Pacific Eng _ : . Fri Aug 1B, 1995 09:58:03 Page 8-1 TURTLE CREEK BUIM OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Coimputation Report _ 1994 HGM 4-Way Stop Method (Future Voltwxe Alternative) '•**,~*~,r,r,►•**~,►,►**,r*,r*s,r***~*,r**,r*,►***,r*,~,►***,r~~*:~***,~***f**t,rs**r***,r,r***,►,►,►*,►** - ' - Intersection #7 3prague & Barker *f,r,r,r*,►,►~****,►*t**~~r**,►~*~,r~****,r*~:*,r*****~t*,r*,►***,r:****f*,►,►**t**t:*****~*~**** • Gycle (sec) : 1 Critical Vol. /Cap. (X) : 0.398 • I.oss Time (aec) : 6 Averaqe Delay (8ec/veh) : 3.5 Optimal Gycle: 0 Levw1 Of Service: A •*******:~,rw*~,►w:*f**~t,r*~~rr*~r*tr*****~r**~►****~*,t*,►*,t,t****~***ttrt*tt*:::*t:*:,~*~r~r,r Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound M.ovement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I Control: - Stop Sign Stop 3ign Stop Sign Stop 3ign Rights : Znclude Includ,e Inclucie Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 ' Voltuae Module : Base Vol: 12 44 5 74 85 27 14 57 32 9 27 43 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 12 45 5 76 B8 28 la 59 33 9 28 44 Added Vol: 0 53 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 12 98 5 76 184 28 14 59 33 9 26 44 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - PHF Adj: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 PHF Vol,%Mne: 13 107 6 83 201 30 3.6 64 36 10 30 48 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 107 6 83 201 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1rLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 13 107 6 83 201 30 16 64 36 10 30 48 11 Saturation Flow Mcdule: 3at/Lane: 665 665 665 789 789 789 408 408 408 342 342 342 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.10 0.85 0.05 0.26 0.64 0.10 0.14 0.55 0.31 0.11 0.34 0.55 Final Sat.: 69 565 32 209 505 75 56 225 127 39 117 187 ------------I Capacity Analysis Modvle: Vol/9at: 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.26 Crit Mbves • *,~~r* ------------I ---------------J~--------------- Level Of service Module: • - Delay/Veh: 2.1 2.1 2.1 4.5 4.5 4.5 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.7 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AdjDel/Veh: 2.1 2.1 2.1 4.5 4.5 4.5 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.7 L03 by Mov+e : A A A A A A A A A A A A *~***,~**,~*,t*~**:*,r***,t*,t**r,t*f***:~***+r*~*t***wte*t►,►~~,►**,►:*~s,~*~r,►*~**,►~~**~**~r** Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . . . , . • Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 9-1 TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT ~ . ' PM PEAK - ~ Level Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM Operatione Method (Base Volie Alternative) -****~w*,t*t~*~t**rr**,r,r,r**w,ttr*t*:*~e~,t*,t*w**t,t*t*~,r*::~rt**,e,t,►*,t*f~**t****~~*,t,tt***: . Intersection #8 Appleway 6 Barker , ' *,t*►**t,t,t*******~*ft***irfr****:t,rt**1r*t~tt~***!e*f*,t,t~*tr*~*f***twt►lrtt:f*tr*~t:*tt*t* Gycle (sec) : 90 Critical Vol./Cap. (X) : 0.464 Loas Time (sec): 12 (Y+R 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.4 Optimal Gycle: 38 Level Of 3ervice: c *srs~~~ss~~~sr~~a~~~r3s~a~t,~~~~s~aaas:*********~*,r,►,~,►~,►~~**t:ft:*,r:t*:*w************ ~ Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound , M,ovemen t: L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R ------------I 11 ; Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights : Include Includ,e Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 a. I Volume Module: Base Vol: 24 104 21 8 144 171 138 301 21 19 324 7 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 25 107 22 8 148 176 142 310 22 20 334 7 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PFiF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volti26 111 23 9 154 183 148 323 23 20 347 8 - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 26 111 23 9 154 183 148 323 23 20 347 8 PG'E Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.05 2.05 Final Vol.: 26 111 23 9. 154 183 148 339 24 20 365 8 Saturation Flow Module: 3at/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.16 0.70 0.14 0.03 0.44 0.53 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.96 0.04 Final 3at.: 220 940 195 41 695 826 1805 3513 249 1805 3718 82 ------------I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/sat: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.10 0.10 Crit Mcv+es: • Green/Cycle: 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.34 0.34 Voltiuae/Cap: 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.56 0.58 0.58 0.74 0.28 0.28 0.10 0.29 0.29 • II I I Lev+el Of 9ervice Module : Delay/Veh: 12.8 12.8 12.8 15.4 15.4 15.4 34.0 13.9 13.9 23.2 13.9 13.9 Uaer DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AdjDel/Veh: 12.8 12.8 12.8 15.4 15.4 15.4 34.0 13.9 13.9 23.2 13.9 13.9 , Queue : 0 2 0 0 3 4 4 6 0 0 7 0 ~**~~e***t***:*****~**,►*r*r►****,r,t*******,tt~*,r:****,r:tr*t*~:*:*,c*~~t~t**,r:,t~::,r*~r**~* Traffix System Vereion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng d. . . ~ ' . Fsi Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 10-1 T[JRTLE CREE,I{ e BU=Z 4rt7'S WI'!,`f#OU'r PRWSCT - Pm PFAIC Level Of S~~rice Detailed Ccaputa,tica Repart , - ; 1994 HCM Operatiorxa I++Sethad • HaLse Volume A1ternative ~x~*~t~r~~*,►*~,►*~~~e~r~r~~r**+**t**~r***f*~r**~~~k**~r**~r*w*~~~**~*~r~~~~,►~*~r~,k*~*w~~t*r~~ Interaection #9 Rgpl-eway S Barkex Apgraaah: North Bound 5auth Ba=d East Sdwnd West Bound ~ Mov,P,~,. ~ ~ ~ L - - R E~ - T - R L - T - R I~ - T - R ~ 11 i i~-----_______-r: i BCH rps xajustea zame vtiixzation Moaule: zanes: o oV 0 0 V 0 o i o z i o i 0 1 1 a I Lane Groug : I,TR LTR T.TR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L RT RT ' #Lrxa2rxGrgs : I I i 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 ; I - --------_b---_ a! I! - I~ r_ -4m--,--_--- ~ HCM Ops Iz:put SatusatYOn Audj Module = Lane Width: 12 1.2 12 12 12 12 - 32 12 12 1-2 12 12 ~ % lIev Veh ; • D D 0 0 Grade : 0 ~ 0% D % 4 % Pax}tirr,g/Hr : Ha No No Na Ht1s Stplsr: 0 0 0 0 I Area 2'yge : C < < [ { < < C < < C [ < C < 17thez' > ] > > > > ] > > > ? > > > Cnf t Pedf I3r : 0 0 0 0 ExclugiveRT : Inalude Include Include Include % RT Prtct: D 0 0 0 ~-----------a-= If--------------- HCM Cyps f(zt) and f (1t) Adj Case Module: ` iF (rt) Case : 7 7 7 7 7 7 5 x,xf 5 5 f(1 t) C ase: .5 5 5 5 5 5 1 xxxc xxxx 1xxxx xxxc I 11 ~ ~ 1_..__.._..__.._---- ~ HGM Ops Satvsatioa Adj b3odule : Ln W3.ci Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 40- 1.00 •1. OD 1.00 Nev Veh laidj: 1.40 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ 6rade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ Farking Adj; 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.40 xxxs 1.00 1.00 xx= 1.00 1,00 Bxrs Stp Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 • xxxx 1.00 1.00 Axea Aaj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 RT A,a.j: 0.88 0.88 0.9e 0.03 0.e3 0.83 .,m= 0.99 0.99 xxxx 1.00 1.00 LT Adj: 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.95 xxoc xooaxx 0.95 xo= xooacx . HCM4 9at Adj: 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.82 0.82 0.82 O.5~5 0.59 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Usr Sat Adj; 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.(}0 i.DtJ 1.00 1.04 ~~~t Adj: 1.00 1.00 s.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PtLl sat Aaj: 0.71 0.71 0.71 0,82 0.82 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 it 11 ~ a t_-------r-r--- ~ J Delay Aaj,setment Factar Madvle: Caordanated: C C C C G C C < < < < < < C No > } > 7 ] ~ > ] > 3 ~ ? ? > } } Sig-rxa1 Type; < < { C E C < C < < C C { A,attsated > ] > > ] } 7 } } } } > > nel-AajFctr: 0.e5 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.e5 0.85 0.85 0.e5 0.85 0.e5 ***~***~►~~,~~~tt~#~~,~~**~* t~ * * ~ ***,~~t# Tra.ffix Sya~em Veraion E. B (c) 1995 DA I,i.censed to Irrland Pacific Eng I , ' . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 10-2 TURTZ.E CREEK ~ BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT • PM PEAK Level Of 3ervice Detailed Coaputation Report (Permitted Left Turn 3at Adj ) ; r , 1994 HCM Operations Method ~ ~ ~-Base Volume Alternative ,►,~,r*~:,~~*,►w**tr~*t~*,r******,rt~►t,r,r:,►****,r*,►,r,r*~t,►t*****~*r,r,r~r~t*,►*~~:~►~tr***f*~*w~r*,r* Intersection #8 Appleway & Barker - *****tr~**::~t,r,►*~:::~r:t*****,t*:**t**~r****,t,twtr~~r***:**t*,►,t**:t*:~:t►***+t~r•::***:** . Approach• Nortti South East West Gycle Length, C: 90 90 xoooocx 3Oos30Ex Actual Green Time Per Lane Group, G: 34.20 34.20 xxxxxx xocxxxx Effective Green Time Per I,ane Group, g: 34.20 34.20 xoooocx Xx3oQtx Oppo s i ng E f f e c tiv+e Green Time, go : 34.20 34.20 xoooocx >00oooc Ntunber Of Opposing I,anes, No : 1 1 3 X3oCocx ".Cx3CKXx . Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: 1 1 xxxxxx xxxM= Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: 26 9 xooo~ac Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.16 0.03 xooocot <>CK3C>Cx . Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.03 0.16 xxoocxoc x2oootx I.eft Turna Per Gycle, LTC: 0.65 0.23 xxxxxx ~ooOocX Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 346 160 xxxxxx XXXXXX Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Gycle, Volc: 8.65 4.00 xxxxxx x.xxxDoc Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: 1.00 1.00 xaoocxoc xDooaot I,ost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xoooQOC >CKDCoX Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 13.75 20.43 xxxxxx xxxacxx Opposing Queue Ratio, qro: 0.62 0.62 xxxxxx Xoocxxx Eff grn blocked by opposing queue, gq: 11.41 4.56 xxxxxx xxx~ Eff grn while left turns filter thru, gu: 20.45 13.77 xxxxxx ~oooc - Max opposing cara azriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxooooc IooQOOc Proportion of Opposing Thru 6 RT cars, ptho: 0.97 0.84 xxxxxx XKootx Left-turn 3aturation Factor, fa: x0ocX)cx xxxxXoc ~oooc~oc Xo°°os Proportion of Left Turns in 3hared Lane, pl: XK30oc >DOCK:oc >CQOOOt Xo~ Through-car Equivalents, ell: 3.88 1.97 xoooooc Xo0ooc single Lane Through-car Equilralents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xoooooc >CKDoosX Miniiaum Lef t Turn Adj us tment Fac tor , fmin : 0.07 0.06 xoooooc 2oooooc Single Lane Left Turn Adjustment Factor, fm: 0.81 0.99 xxxxxx >0o3OCx Left Turn Adjustrnent Factor, flt: 0.81 0.99 xxoonoc x00ocxx le~t,t*~,►ttr*wt**!**tt+tlt**,twtrrt+t*****t***trtr***~*******t,t*~**~r~~*f~*~**,t,ttlr**fe*,t,t,tt*~* - Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to'Inland Pacific Eng - • . :'3. ~ _ Fri kug is, 1995 09.58:03 Page 11-1 ~ T[TRTLE CREEK - BUI LL1 OUT Wg'1TH0U'I' PRWF CT FM PF Ax Irevel of Sez-viae Computation Aeport - 1'994 HCM ~erations I+dethod (FLatvre VoILume A1terxxative) : *****~#~*::~~*~.~~~#:#*~~rr~*****~~~~~~~~r~r*~**t~•~~~~,~,r~,~~~r~r*,r*~~~#~~****ff***#* - r Intersection #9 Appleway & Barker . ~~*~*~~~**~~~~**~r~►~r*~~**f~***ft~f~r*~,r**,r**a*~~,~*~~~,r~#~r#~,~****f~~~**,r**~~~:~f*~~ - , . F Gycle (see): 90 Critical Vol. /Gap. (X) : 0.530 - I,oss Timv_- (sec) : 12 (Y+$ ~ 4 sea) Avexage Delay (seolveh): 15.0 . ~ optima1 Cycle: 42 I,evel Of Service: c ,~*~r*~**r**,r~*~****~~*~~**#**~~~r***~r*~~~**•f~t~~f#r~#~*~~~f~~~*~,r*~~#~~r~*~~~.*,~* i APProach. North Bourrd 5outh Bound East Bound West Baund Moveme?t: L - T - R L - T - A L - T - R L - T - R ~ ------__--t-a ~ . Control.: Permztted Pex'mitted Pr'o#ected Protected _ Pxghts: Include Iaclude Include ' Include Min. Greea: 0 0 0 0 0 0 G b 0 0 0 0 Lanes; 0 Q 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 d 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 ~ 1--------------- I~ II ~ Volture Modrale: ~~~e Vol: aa 104 2-1 e iaa 171 13e 301 21 19 324 7 Growtn xdj: 1,03 1.03 1,03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 FassexByvai : o o v o a o a o 0 0 0 o z~~ia.l Bse. 2S 107 22 a 14e 176 142 ~10 22 20 334 7 ' Added Vol : 3 36 14 4 66 4 8 0 5 26 4 8 Initial Fiat: 27 143 35 12 214 190 150 310 27 45 334 15 _v~~r Ad~: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 0_96 0.96 0,96 O.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 ' PHE Volti29 149 37 13 223 189 156 323 28 47 347 36 Reduct Vol: Q 0 fl• 0 0 Q 0 D 0 0 Q 0 Reduced Vvl: 29 149 37 13 223 186 155 323 28 47 347 16 gcE Aaa: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 bd[.F Aaj : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.ao 1.00 1.00 1.0s 1.05 1.00 1.05 1.05 ~~nal Vol.. 29 149 37 13 223 1ee 156 339 29 47 365 17 _______u_-__~--------------- 13_____-.._-------I~-------__-a-___~ 3aturation FIaw Madule: + SatlLane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ,1900 1900 1900 Aa~~stmoant: 0.70 0.7o ' 0.70 0.e2 0.e2 0.82 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99 Lanes: 0.13 0.70 0.17 0.03 0.53 0,44 1.00 1.84 0.16 1.00 1.91 0.09 Fina1 5at.: 178 915 227 48 823 694 1805 3455 295 1805 3595 167 . I _w___-_---------------------- II I~___-_--__-- ~ . CaLpaaity Aaalysis Mo3v1e: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.10 0.10 4.43 0.10 0.10 ~ Crit FAcves: 6reerrfGycle: D.t1 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 6.51 0.16 0_29 0.28 0.07 0.19 0.19 vol,melcap: 0.32 0.32 0,32 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.53 0.53 I ---------y_-_--~ IjevQ1 Of Searvice Maciule: I7elayf Veh: B. 4 8.4 8.4 30.0 14'. 0 10.0 23.7 16.8 16.8 26.2 21.7 21.7 LTser DelArdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1_00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1_00 Adj]Del/V'eh: 8.4 0.4 8.4 10,0 10,0 10.0 23.7 15.8 16.8 26.2 21.7 21.7 Qxeue : 0 2 1 0 4 3 4 T 3 1 B 1 ~:~#~ft*•~ftf*~#f**ftf~~t~:*s~r*~~~*~***,~rf**~***tt~**~~#t~~~~r***r:~#,r~~r~***~~~* Traffix System veraior, 6.18 (c) 1995 DA Licexs.aed to Inland P$cific Er►g ~ s Frl Aug 1$, 1995 09:58:03 Page 12-1 -----__r- _____-------e------ i 2*[7FiTLE C.'REEK . , 13VILD OU'I' WITH0UT PROJECT pM FEAK I+evel O€ Senrice Detailed Co7mputation Rego]rt , ~ ' ' , • 3.994 HCM aperatioris Zietkiad • - 4 -`•r ' - - - F2t11Se V[7l1~ AltePI13t2ve . , 11~rir~f###~r**~***t4*ir*irles~~e~#irir~~irtllr~r**1r*~r~t#lr~i~+tyMsYirlr~f~tF4d1~r~*#~~r**#ir#iitit*ir#i~l3klrle*4 r IaterSeCti4n #8 Appleway F Barker : ***~r~~**~~*r~et~*~*~~~~ft~~ar~~*~*~**~~~r**f•**~e~~r#*~*~*,r****~sr~r~ff,r,~**~~#~r~~r*#~r,~ Approach: North Bound South Bounct East Hound West Sound Movemerit : L - T - R L - T 4 Et L - T r 'R L - T - R I Y_=_--------- 11 I I_____-----_--_ I I-________--_--- HCM 4ps Adjusted Lane Utilixatiarx Madule: . Lanes: 0 0 1! 4 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 Q 1 1 Q 1 0 1 1 0 - Laste Group : LTR IsTR LTR LTR LTR LTR L RT RT L R"P RT #LnsznGrpo: i 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 2 2 1 2 2 ~ 11 ~ , - WCM Cps anput saturatioa Adj Module : Lane Wa.d.th: 12 12 12 12 12• 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 $ Hev Veh: ~ . 0 0 d? Grade: 0% D$ Q~ 01% I Paxk a. ngl Hr: No No No N° ' Hus Stp/Hr; 0 0 0 0 Area Type: C < < C C e C C < c C C < C C Dther > > 3 > 7 7 > > > > > > > > > Crif t F'ed1Hr : 0 0 0 Q . ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Znclude $ ItT Prtct: 0 0 Q 0 ~ 11 I I HCM vps f (rt) and f(It) Adj Case M+odule: f(rt) Case: 7 7 7 7 7 7 x}os~s 5 5 xxxx 5 5 f( lt ) Case : 5 5 5 5 5 5 xxxx xxxx 1xxxc xmi= -----------F I 11 I I ~ HCM ops Saturation Adj Mac3ule: Ln, Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. OD .1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ev Ven Aaj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 i_oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1r00 Graae Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Fa$king Adj: 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.0(} 1.00 Bus Stp Adj : 1.00 I. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.40 1.00 1.00 RT Adj: 0.68 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.84 xxxx 0.99 0,99 xxxx 0.99 0_99 LT Adj: 0.79 0.79 0 . 7 9 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxc Hr-M sat Aaj: v.70 0.70 0.70 o.ea 0.e2 0.92 0,95 0.99 0_99 0.95 0.99. 0.99 vgr sat Aaj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 NEF Sat Ad~ : 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.. 00 Fh-l Sat Acij: 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.82 0.82 0.e2 4.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.59 0.99 ------------I ---------------11 11 il--4i-_-----____ ~ Delay Adjus#merxt Factor Modvle: Coordinated: C C C C { C < C [ C C C C ~ < lqo > 7 > 3 > > ] } ] > > ? > > > > Signal R'ype : < < < < C C { C C < C C C Actuated > ] > > ? > ] ] 7 > > 7 ? DelAdjFctr: o.65 0.85 O.Bs 0.65 O.B5 O.B5 o.85 D.eS 0.85 O.BS 0.65 0.85 *~r~*~dr~~r,r~dr*~**,r~r,►*,r~~*~r*#*#*:~~~~~~*~r**~~~~****,r~r#f~~~~r,r*t~r#~r~*~~~*~~~~~~#~#t ' Traffix S}rstem Versian 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licenaed to Inlanc3 Pacific Eng ~ nH rA Fri Aug 16, 1995 09:58:03 Page 12-2 TURTLE CREEK . BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK • Level Of Service Detailed Coaiputation Report (Permitted Left Turn 3at Adj) _ 1994 HCM Operations Method • Fliture Voll- Alternative • ,~*,►t:~r**~***:*****,t~*w,t*,►,t*,►,r,t***,~*,tt~,r*,►t,r*,t~r,r,rw,r*,t*,►,►s:*,►rr,t*,t*!:*,~~►*,~~e**~:tf** • Intersection #8 Appleway 6 Barker **,r**,t*~~►*:*,r***~*:~,►te,r,r~*:,r::,►,r,r:*:**:*****,►,►*~r*****~*~****~t#,►*t~**~r****~~~*~,►~ Approach: North South East West Gycle Length, C: 90 90 -oaacXX xxXcxX Actual Green Tiure Per I,ane Group, G: 46.01 46.01 xxxxxx )000ooc Effective Green Ti.me Per Lane Group, g: 46.01 46.01 xoocosx Mcx.)= Oppo s ing E f f ec tive Green Tim,e, go : 46.01 46.01 xxoooc xx0oQc Number Of Opposing I.anea, No: 1 1 xxxxxx )CXX.Nocx Number Of Lanes In Lane Group, N: • 1 1 xxxxxx >00CHOoc Adjusted Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt: . 29 13 xootxxot )oatxxx Proportion of Left Turns in Lane Group, Plt: 0.13 0.03 xootxoc xx2CH3Cc Proportion of Left Turns in Opp Flow, Plto: 0.03 • 0.13 xoooQQC XXooQCx Left Turns Per Gycle, LTC: 0.72 0.33 xxxxxx XXaocxx Adjusted Opposing Flow Rate, Vo: 424 215 xx-xxxx xXoooQc Opposing Flow Per Lane Per Cycle, Volc: 10.60 5.38 xxxxxx >ooQOOt Opposing Platoon Ratio, Rpo: ' 1.00 1.00 xxxxxx X2Co= Lost Time Per Phase, tl: 4.00 4.00 xocoooc Nooo= Eff grn until arrival of left-turn car, gf: 18.79 26.10 xxoocxoc ~oQC~ooc Opposing Queue Ratio, qzo: 0.49 0.49 xoooooc xXXK)m Eff grn blocked by oppoeing queue, gq: 9.98 4.33 xxxxxx xCKa0Qc - Ef f grn while lef t turns f il ter thru, qu : 27.22 19.90 xooooQC Iooootx Max opposing car8 arriving during gq-gf, n: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx 2o0o3(X - Proportion of Opposing Thru 6 RT cara, ptho: 0.97 0.87 xxoooc X)0oaoc Left-turn Saturation Factor, fs: 110cx~= xxxxxx Mocxioc 300CMooc Proportion of Left Turns in 3hared Lane, pl: XooQOC Xxooogc XOMot 30CH3ooc T'hrough-car Equ;valents, ell: 5.28 2.37 xxxxxx xXoQOc Single Lane Through-car Equivalents, e12: 0.00 0.00 xxxxxx xXOCKXoc Minim= I,eft Turn Adjustment Factor, fmin: 0.05 0.04 xoooooc XXXXooc Single Lane Lef t Turn Adj us tment Factor, fm: 0.79 0.98 xxxxxx 30oc3= Lef t Turn Adj us t,meat Fac tor , f 1 t: 0.79 0.98 xosxoooc XocMooc . . *,r*,r*~,r***t********~n,r,t~►~r*:*:,r+r*,r**********~r~r,~**s#,~,r******,r**t*..~:**~►*****:,►****~ Traffix System Veraion 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~3 . . . ' Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 13-1 ~ ~ T[JRTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT ' PM PEAK ~ I,evel Of 3ervice Computation Report 1994 HCM .Unaignalized Method (Base Volie Alternativ+e) ' ****t,r***tt*~***te,rt*:**:f*:,r+r~**,r****~,r*,r*****,r*,r,►*****,r**,r******,r******,r*,r,r~*,r* Interaection M10 'WID Ramps b Barker • ~ ' *:*******~**,r*****~**~,r*~~r**~***:***t,r*t*,r:**~t*+~:***~t,t*rr*****,►***,r*t,►,r,r,►***w*,r* Average Delay (sec/veh) : 2.4 Worst Caae Level Of Service: C • • ,r**~r~,r***,r~*+r*~,r****,►*****,r*,r~*t**tt***,r,r******~~:*t~~r*,r****~*:,r*,r,t**,r~~*~r~*~**,r • Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound Movem,ent : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I I I I---------------' 1 Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled 3top Sign stop 3ign . Aights: Include Include Include Include ~ Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 , . ' ------------I Vol'lnne Module: Base Vol: 90 339 19 12 253 114 41 9 7 26 30 22 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 ~ PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 93 349 20 12 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Voltm-: 104 391 22 14 292 131 47 10 8 30 35 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 104 391 22 14 292 131 47 10 8 30 35 25 ~ 11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Adjusted Vo1LModule: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ % Gycle/Cars : x2oQC 20QCx zoocx Xcxx .10ooc xx= x3oot ?°°Qt $ Truck/Comb: xDocx Xooc X o= x) otx x~ 2CKXc )oooc Xooc PCE Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cycl/Car PCE : xxxx *.ocxx I'D= Xxxx Xxocx XQOC 3oQOC 20otx Trck/Cmb PCE : >L,.otx DCtxx ICcxx xxxx Xcxx Xo= xxxx XcXc Adj Vol.: 114 391 22 15 292 131 52 11 9 33 38 28 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/3): 30 MPH « ~ MoveUp Time : 2.1 xxxx xoQOSx 2.1 xxxx xxxsx 3.4 3.3 2.6 3.4 3.3 2.6 Critical Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxotxc 5.0 xxxx xoxacc 6.5 6.0 5.5 6.5 6.0 5.5 1---------------1.1 ---------------11 ---------------11 Capacity Mrodule: , Cnflict Vol: 423 xxxx xxxxc 413 xxxx xxxocx 906 887 357 886 942 402 Potent Cap.: 1078 xxxx xntxoot 1090 xxxx xooooc 316 373 913 325 349 867 Adj Cap: 1.00 xoooc xxootx 1.00 xxxx xxxxx 0.77 0.84 1.00 0.85 0.84 1.00 Move Cap.: 1078 xxxx xxxox 1090 xxxx xxxOC 244 315 913 276 295 867 ------------I ---------------If ---------------If ---------------11 Level Of 3ervice Module: 3 topped Del : 3. 7xxxx xoocxoc 3. 3xxxx xooQOC 18.3 11.8 4.0 14.6 13.8 4.3 IA3 by Mnve : A * * p, : * * * * * * * , Movement: LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xocxoc xxxx xxxoc xocxoc xxxx xoocxx xooQC 279 xooooc xoooc 352 xoccc . 3hrd 3 tpDel : xotxoot xxxx xxocxx mQOQC xxxx xooocx mcooc 16.9 xooKxs -ooocx 13.7 =occ 3hared LOS: * * * * * * * C * * C * ~ ApproachDel: 0.8 0.1 15.5 11.4 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Znland Pacific Eng _ ~ a . •A Fri Avg 19, 1995 09:58:03 Page 14-1 TCTRTLE CREEK p B[JIID OUT WITF30iJT PROwTECT ' PM FEP,K • . T.evel of servzce Canpv,tation Repart . - 1994 HCM Unsignaliaed Method (Euture volume Alternative) *srdr~r~r*~~**,rt~#*~r~r*rr~~~~r~~~rdr*~rer*~*#~r~~**.*t#~~#,r,~,r**,r~#,r~r*sr,r#~:~~~~~~~~r~*+r**~~,r# , IntAazsection #10 WB Ramps & Barker ' . , ' ~ft~~~~*~~r*~*~**~#~r~rr~f*t*fft*~#~*~**~*~~r**~**t~~tt~f~~~#~r~**,~~r,r,rw~r**~r##~r~~~;r*~~ ' , ' Av+erage Delay (sealveh) : 3.1 Wvrst Ca,me Le-vel Of Senri.ce: ~ . • ~*~r**~,rr,r~r,r~*~*~*~~rr~**~~r~~r#,~r**~~******~~r~~~o-~~~~dr#~r*#,rrrr~*~f**~~~~~**~~~~~~f* - _ . Approaah; North Sound Sauth Bov,nd East Houn3 West Baund . Mov+ement : L - T - A L T - R L - T - R L - T - R -~~------------Y- . Contral; Unaontrolled LTncox3,txolled Stop Sign Stap 9ign , Rights: Tnalude _ Include Include Include I,anea: 0 0 1! 0 0 Q 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 D D 1! Q 4 I I ~ ~ a_-------------- ~ - Vc2vme Moclule : ' . Base Vol:• 90 339 1-9 12 253 11.4 41 9 T 26 30 22 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.43 , PasserByVol: C} Q 0 0 D 0 U p 0 Q 0 0 Initia1 3ase: 93 349 20 32 261 117 42 9 7 27 31 23 - naA a vol: 23 51 0 0 19 17 8 o ia o 0 0 Initial Fut: 116 404 20 12 280 134 sD 9 25 27 33 23 User Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1_00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.99 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volvme: 129 448 22 14 313 150 56 10 28 30 35 25 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 Final. Vol.: 129 448 22 14 313 150 56 10 26 30 35 25 Ad3ustea Voiune zMbaule: ~rade: 0$ 0% ot at % GycYe/Cafia : - xxxx xxxx x~ >Dx XXXX x2osx xD= =¢zcx $ Truckf Camb: Xxa= XXXoc -%L)= 20= 10= xn= 20= PCE Adj: 1.10 1.04 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Cyc1 / Car FCE : >Dcrc 20= 20= >ocXX xXxX 30= xx~= =Cr1X Trck f G`='6 PC$ : xxCX >0cx "-CX=Cc -IDLxX DOO7c =0~ aD= 2acx Adj Vol«: 142 448 22 15 313 i50 62 11 31 33 38 28 1 Critica.Y Gap Modu1e: Popvlation: 304000 CC Run SF+eed{NIS~-: 30 NPH Mov+eUp Time : 2.1 xxxx xos= 2.1 xxxx xxaxxx 3.4. 3 _ ~3 2.6 3.4 3_ 3 2.6 Czitiaal Gp: 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 5.0 x?xc_xxxxx 6.5 _6.0 . 5.5 5.5 5.0 5.5 I 1 l 11 ~ , Capacity Module: Cziflict Val: 463 xx= xxxat 469 xx;~Cx xxxxx 1019 1000 388 1009 1065 459 Potent Cap.: 1032 xaa€ xxxxc 1024 ~x xxxxc 272 326 BB1 275 301 O11 ~ Axij Cap : 1.00 xxxx xxx= 1.00 xxxx xoa£nx 0.72 0.79 1.00 0.79 0.79 1.00 bsove eap.: 1032 xxxx xxxxx, 1024 xxxx -=21= 195 2se ee1 217 239 eil I ~ 11 ~ lpevel of semv±ce Module: S topped Del: 4.0 xx= xrcxcx a. 5 xxxx xxxxx 25.9 14.5 4.2 19.3 17.6 4.6 I,OS isy bdav+e : 14 * * A * * } * * * * Ma*eme*+t : LT - I,TR - RT LT - L'R'R - RT IPT - LTR -~tT LT - LTR - RT $hared Cap. : xxxx x;~s:x xxxx xxxx xxxx 262 xm= xxxx 2 B 6 >oaaas Shrd StgDel:x~vcoe xxxx rnsxxc 3u=x xxxx xoxxc xxxxx 21.4 ~t 18.3 ~c Shared IAS : ~ * * c : - - ApgscaatYDel: 0.9 0.1 18.3 14.5 Traff:Lx 5ysterz Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Er}g J , y I ' Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 15-1 • TtTRTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT • PM PEAK . . , Level Of service Coaputation Report 1994 ACai Unsignalized Method (Base Voliae Alternative) : ~ : ******~~r*t*****~**~*,r,r****,r*,r*re**~**,r*****:**:**t:,r,~*,r*,r*****~r*~,r,t,r**:*:**~*,r*,r* Interaection #22 3prague 6 Appleway " • ~ `T• . ****:,~,~:•+r:*:,►**~r,r***:**,~***,r,r***w*f**+r*t~~r*,►,r**rr*******:**,►**,r**~**,rt,►,►**t*,r*** . . . ~ Average Delay ( sec/veh) : 5.5 Wors t Case Level Of 3ervice : F . ' ; . *~*,t**#*:*:***,t*!*:ltttr~t**~1~rt►*,t****frr~t,t******~****ft***ttt~t~**ff***wAf**,t**,t*t*** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound MQVement : L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R - Control: 8top Sign Stop 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Znclude Include Include Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 Voltme Module : Base Vol: 86 1 4 0 0 13 6 521 168 3 538 6 _ Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserHyVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' Initial Bse: 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1000 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volum: 99 1 5 0 0 15 7 601 194 3 620 7 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 99 1 5 0 0 15 7 601 194 3 620 7 ------------I ---------------~i--------------- Adjusted Volu~e Module: Gzade: 0$ 0$ 0$ 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : ,-oooc XXotX XXooc xxxs Xocx xxxx Xoot xxDCc % Truck/Comb: xxxx xKXoc Mcxot >oQOC >osxx xx= 2CMDCc XXooc PCE A,dj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Cycl/Car PCE : Xotx x>= Xocx YDooc 30= x~oos 2ocxx "Qocx Trck / Gmb PCE : Xxacx 2osxx Macx xxxx xaDM .1-atxx xOot xxxx Adj Vol.: 109 1 5 0 0 16 8 601 194 4 620 7 ---------------11 11 ---------------II Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 MPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxxcx xxxx 2.6 2.1 xoooc xxxxx 2.1 xxxx xxxonc Critical Gp: 7.0 6.5 5.5 xoQOOC xxxx 5.5 5.5 xxxx xxxxx 5.5 xooc xooooc II II Capaci ty Module : Cnflict Vol: 1335 1335 397 xxxx xxxx 314 627 xoooc xooooc 794 xxxx xxxooc Potent Cap.: 148 181 871 xxxx xoooc 960 790 xxxx xxxoc 642 xxxx xoxxtx Adj Cap : 0.96 0.97 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xooac xxQOOC 1.00 xxxx xooosx Mave C ap 143 176 871 xxxx xoQC 960 7 9 0xcxc xooooc 6 4 2xooos xooooz ------------I Level Of 3ervice Module : Stopped Del: 77.7 20.6 4.2 xooQOC xxxx 3.8 4.6 xxxx xxooot 5.6 xxxx xxooos LOS by Mcve: F * * * * A A * * g * * Movnm,ent : LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT I,T - ZTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 3hared Cap. : xxxx xxxx 486 xxxx xxxx xooocx xooc xooc xooooc xoQOC xxxx xooQOc 3hrd 3 tpDel :>oQOOC xxxx 7. 5 xoooc xxxx xooQC mocxc xooc ~ooQOC xxoooc xoooc =oocx 3hared IA3: * * g * * t * * * * * * ApproachDel: 73.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 Traffix 9ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng . ~ . . Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 16-1 ` TURTLE CREEK ' BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK , Level Of 3ervice Coaputation Report ; 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Euture Vol- Alternative) . ***f**,ttf**,t****:*:*:*****w~***~1r**,ttr***t***~*tr,tf*~**trirt►**s#f,t,►*,tf:~fl:t,t*t*,t,r*• , Interaection #22 9prague 6 Appleway • w**~t*~t***:~******t*,ttr,r,►*~r*~►***tr,r*::*:*,r,r,rttr***:*****~***~t::::*t:*w***+~~s***,t* • Average Delay (sec/veh) : 6.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: F ~,r*****,►*****,r*******:*,r*~►*~*it******,►*****:*~**,r*~r,r*~::**wwR+~~r~****,►:,►~::::~:~: , Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: 3top 3ign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 , - Volume Module: Base Vol: 86 1 4 0 0 13 6 521 168 3 538 6 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PaeserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 89 1 4 0 0 13 6 537 173 3 554 6 Ad:~c.~d Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 7 0 Initial Eut: 89 1 C 0 0 13 6 550 173 3 561 6 Uaes Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volume: 99 1 5 0 0 15 7 615 194 3 628 7 - •Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 99 1 5 0 0 15 7 615 194 3 628 7 Adjusted Volie Module: Grad,e: 0$ 0$ 0% 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : XXXt xxaot Xooot xMIoc Xocc Xotx Ioocx xxxx $ Truck/Comb: XQOC .10QOt =ocx >0oQC xxxx XcNoc 20cx >oooc PC'E Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PCE: XXXx >0= 3oooc xxxx x2ooc Xooc XKoc xxxoc Trck/Cmb PCE : XDoot >ooot xDooc 2oooc ~c xOooi xxooc 20txx Adj Vol.: 109 1 5 0 0 16 8 615 194 Q 628 _ 7 •Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 NPH « MoveUp Time : 3.4 3.3 2. 6xocxcx xoooc 2.6 2.1 xooQC xxcxs 2.1 xoooc xooooc Cri ti ca1 Gp: 7.0 6.5 5. 5xooxoc xooQC 5.5 5. 5xooQC xxoooc 5. 5xooQC xaoQOC " ------------I , Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1357 1357 404 xxxx xooc 317 635 xooc xoQOOt 809 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 144 175 864 xxxx xxxx 956 782 xoaot xxxoQC 631 xoooc xxocxc Adj Cap : 0.96 0.97 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xooos xooooc 1.00 xcooc xocooc Move Cap. : 138 170 864 xoooc xoooc 956 782 xoooc xxooac 631 =oQC xoQOOc ------------I Lev+el Of 3ervice M,odule: 3toppccl Del : 85.6 21.3 4. 2xoooc xxxx 3.8 4. 6xoooc xoooQC 5- 7xoooc xxQOc I,03 by Move: F * * * * A A * * g Mrovement : I,T - LTR - RT • LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 9hared Cap. : xooc xoooc 476 xoooc xxxx xxooc xooc xoeos xaooQC xxxx xonc xxxooc 3hrd StpDel:xm= -.ooQC 7.7 ax~oooc ioooc =ooc zooooc ~oc >ooQOC mocxoc xoooc xoo= 9hared L03: * B --ApproachDel: 81.3 3.8 0.0 0.0 Traffix System Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng ' ~ . ..f : . _ • Fri Aug 18, 1995 09:58:03 Page 17-1 - ' TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT • . PM PEAK . I,evel Of 3ervice Caaputation Report 1994 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Voliune Alternative) • . , *~t**~r:*t*****,r*tr**,t******tr*******,t**,rtr,t**+t*R*,r,t**~rrt*t*~*~,t,►~***~*tt:w*t*t*,c*,r,t Intersection #30 BARKER/EB I-90 RAMPS ' 'r ~t*ir!*~~~******t~*t!~*t**ftF*'******~*t***1'*~tt*****~~*****tt~**tt*t*!f***~*~*tt**~k# Average Delay (aec/veh) • 5.9 Worst Case I,evel Of Service: fl , . - . *,rt*::***ww**tr*******w******+r**:f::tw,r*t*,r~~r*:****+r*+~tff**t►,t:t*w****t*+r*:**,r**t* ••,Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound Weat Bound _ Movpsnen t: I, - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign 3top 3ign Righta: Include Include Includ,e Include . - I,anes : 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------I . Volume Module: - Base Vol: 0 293 35 67 208 0 228 1 158 0 0 0 . Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 . . PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Bse: 0 302 36 69 214 0 235 1 163 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volum: 0 317 38 73 225 0 247 1 171 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 0 317 38 73 225 0 247 1 171 0 0 0 ------------I ---------------H ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------I Adj us ted Voltmee M,odule : Grade: 0$ Q~ 0$ 0$ $ Gyicle/Cars : 20ocx 20QOC 200tx 20ot 2osxx 2C°X ?°Q°{ )oCX°t $ Truck /Comb : 20sxx xxxx 2oQOC >osxx 2CMooc Xooc 2ooot MQOc PG'E Adj: 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.-00 1.00 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 Gycl/Car PCE : 2Dcx 20osx XKXc' xDotx 2cooc xxaoc )ooQC 20= Trck/Cnb PCE: ~QOOC xx= xxxx '"COos xxXc IocXQC Nooos XDooc Adj Vol.: 0 317 38 80 225 0 271 1 188 0 0 0 ------------I ---------------11 ---------------11 ---------------11 Critical Gap Mcdule: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(N/S): 30 MPH « • MoveUp Time : xmocx xQOtx ,oQOQC 2.1 xoooc xxxxx 3.4 3.3 2.6 xonQSx xxxx xoooQc Cri tical Gp : xxooQS xxxx xxxxx 5.0 xxxx xaooc 6.5 6.0 5.5 xootxs xxxx xcxoc ------------I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxoooc 355 xoooc xxoocx 634 653 225 xooc xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xooox 1161 xooot xaoooc 455 496 1065 >o= x)oc xxxoQc Adj Cap : xooos xxxx xxoooc 1.00 xxxx xxocxx 0.92 0.92 1.00 xoooc xxxx xxxxc Move C ap xoooc xxxx xoatx 1161 xoooc 3oooQC 419 457 1065 xxxx xoooc xxooQc ------------I --------------=11--------------- Level Of 3ervice M,odule : 3 topped Del :xocxot xxxx xoocxoc 3. 3xoocx xxxxoc 20.7 7.9 4. 0xoooc xooc xoocxx LOS by Mrove : * * t A * * * * A * ~ * . . Moveaeent : LT - I,TR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 9hared Cap. : mooc xoooc ,ooooc .10ooc 210ooc x00ooc 419 xxxx xaoooc xoooc xoQOt xxxxx shrd 9 tpDel : xooQOC xoooc xooaos xoooQC xxxx xooooc 20.8 >oooc xoooQC xocxoQC xxxx xocx= 9hazed L03: D * * t * * . ApproachDel: 0.0 0.9 13.9 0.0 Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inland Pacific Eng E . . Fri Aug XB, 1995 09:58:04 Page 18-1 , - t---------------------------------r-..-_--_------------------ - ~ ~ Ti TRTLE CREE K " BUIIAD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT pM PEa.x T.evel Of Service Camputation Report 1994 IiC.M Unsigrxalixed Method (Fatuse Vo1=e Alternativ+e) ~#*~rlr**iriklr~rakitic**iFffff**ksk11*411*ir**ir**#****irir~lririh*ir**er****k**~rik**~r#ik**~~*ir*#**fr*#~e - , • - ~ Trxteraectian 430 SAPJMR/EB I-90 RAl*PS ~~e*,~#~~*r*t~~ff~~**~*~~,**~tr~r**~r~~~*~~~r~r*~k~**~~~~~~~r~,~~~~~~***~~h~*****,~~****#*~~~ ' • Avezage De1ay (sec/v+eh) : 10.3 Worst Case Lev+el +Df Service: E *~~rr**~r~r**~r*~~*f*~*~ar********t►r*~~~*~~~r~*~~r*~r*,r~,r,~*r*~~r~r~~r~►,r~r*~*,~~~*~~~r~*~~*~ . z AP,proach. North Bazxnd Sauth Bound Eas t Sorand West Hcsund Movemerr t : L - m - R I, - T - R I► - T - R L - T - R -----___-_--f--------------- ---r-r---------II---_~--_--___-rll I Control. UrYcotYtrolled Uacontrolled Stop Sigri Stop Sigsl Rights : Include Irrclude Irtclude Include Lanes: D 4 0 1 0 0 i L? 0 0 4 i 4 D 1 0 0 0 0 0 ~ d i ~ - - valume M.adule : Ba9e V01: 0 293 35 67 208 0 220 3- 158 C] 0 0 Growth Aaj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasaerByvOl; 0 0 4 C} 0 0 D 0 .0 4 0 D ~~~tial sBe: 0 302 36 69 aia o 235 1 1163 o a 0 Aaaea voY: o 42 10 4 33 a 32 o 42 0 o a znitial Fut: 0 344 46 73 247 a 267 1 205 a o a uaer xdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FHF A.djr 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0_95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PI3F Volume: 0 361 49 77 259 4 260 1 215 0 0 0 - Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Firia1 Val.: 0 351 - 48 77 259 0 280 1 215 0 0 0 Ad,justed VoluYme Module : Grade: O~ 01% 0% 0% % G`}rcle/Cars : lcxacx 20x3c xxxx lucac x--,= xxxx ~s xCtX % Truck/Comb: x1= ~ ~oc XXXX x%= ~ot xxxx 300M PG'E Adj : 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1_10 1.10 1.14 1.10 1.10 1.10 CyalI ca.r PCE: 2D= . ~c x--M= 2M)sx 10= 2cocc XX20c JXc~m Trr..}c/[mb PC:E : ~roc~c 20= xXx,x 1== xx= >a= Ncx= 20= Adj Vol.: 0 361 48 e5 259 U 309 1 236 0 D 0 Critiaal Gap 3wlrsdvle; Population: 300000 CC Run 3pe€d (N/S) 30 kdPFi <C Mave[3p Tirne : xo~ xxxx mecnc .2.1 xxxx xxxc,x 3.4 3.3 2.6 xxxxc xxxx xxxxx ~ C r i ti ca1 C;p ; 3oxxx xxxx x'aaxxx 5.0 xxxx xxxxx 6,5 6. Q 5. 5 xxxxx xxxx =Cm= I 11 ~ Capacity Modu1e: Cnfli ct vo l: xxxx xxxx xxxooc 410 -.D= >cCH= 722 746 25 9 xxxx x:~= xoxxxc Po tent Cap.: xac= xx= xxxxx 1094 xxxx ao,......: 404 443 1023 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Adj C ap : xotStx xxxx~aoc 1.00 x= xxxxx 0.91 0.91 1. 4 0 20= mo= ~ Move Cap.: xx= X:)Iac 1094 Mcxx 3cccoc 366 403 1023 ~ xxxx mcccx Ip Lev+el Of 3ex-vice Module: . stopped Del: X>aaqc ,o= x~ 3. 5 xxxx xxxxoc 3 9 .1 9. 0 4.5 xcoc xxxx N2o= LCa S hy 14eve; * ,r * A ~ ~ r p, * * * 3wiovrment: LT - x,TR - RT I,T ~ LTR - RT LT LTR - RT LT - ITR - fiT 5ha.red Cag. : x= x~A[ xx)= ~ xxxx xxaxx 368 xxxx x= x= ~~ac ' Shrd .9tptiel : x2o= -%=xx 2ovcxx =xc xDcam 39.5 xvo= x~o= 2cxxx xxxx ,oaaat Shared LOS: * * * * * * B * * * * * AgproacbDel: 0.0 4.9 24.0 0.0 Traffzx System Version 6.8 ~c) 1995 DA Licensed to Inlaad Pacific Eng-- , . k ~ Fr~. Aug 1Br 1995 09:58:1]4 Fage ~9 ----___.,r fi---------------------°__------ -__------Y_--___________--__ ~ ' TLTA'I'LE CFiEFK N ' . HuZLD OxJ2' WITEOUT PRQJECT a P!4 PEAK ,-a - _-------------------------f_-_____--------__----______- , - LeveX Of 3ervice Computation Report' h Yp.ti Jr 1994 BCM Vnsign~lited Met~ZOd (Base Voltmue Alternative) **,►~*,r*e*~#****s*~~*~r,r*,r**,r~#~r~~r~~*~~~r~*f****ftt~t~*~r,►~r~r~~***~*~*#~*~~r~~**~***~~ - . l Intersection #155 Sprague & Long - . , ..q' _ - • *7k**7k*'~*f'*#*'~#~Ff~FLF74'k****1r'****#*7k~*t~'*##~71F9M*##7k**7k*ff~'t~e~F~r~l'91'~7k***#~hlF~l~!**7474~~t*~ir* * . ~j;• - Average Delay (secf3reh) : 0,5 Worst Caae Lev+el Gf Ser-vice: A ~ • *t~f*t~~r,~~~*~~~~~r~**~*~,r#*,r~*tt~*~~*~**,r*~**#~#f~**~~~r*~r~r~sr~,r*~*~~r~r~r~r*,r#:~*~*~r~ ~ - • - Approach: ' North 33ot3nd South Bound East Bound. West 13aund . • 'Moveaent: L - T - R L - T - R L - T W R L - T - R ---------------II ~ , Control: Stop Sign Stog Sign Uncontralled Uricontrolled , Rights : Ir►clude In.clude Ixi.clude Include . Lanes: a 0 1! o v v 0 0 a a o o 0 1 0 o i a o o . • ------------I ll--------------- 11 11 ------___------E Voltiume Module : Base Val: 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 a 82 0 Gxowth Ad.j: 1.03 1.43 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1«03 1.43 1.03 , PasserByVal: D 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 In-itial Bse: 21 0 3 4 0 0 0 13.6 16 8 84 4 user Aa.j. 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.ao 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PxF Aaj: o.89 o.eq a.89 a.aq o.sq o.eq a.eq a.eq o.89 v.eq o.es o.e9 PxP Volume: 23 a 3 a o 0 o 152 le 9 94 o Ikeduct vol: 0 0 o o 0 o o 0 0 o o a )Finaa vol. ; 23 4 3 0 0 ' a o 152 Is 9 94 o I ------------rw 11 ~r Adjuated volume Module: Grade; 0% 0$ ow 0% % Gyclel Caxs : XX30€ xxxx ~.x 2LXIIDc %CX= ,C= 2ccxnc xOGoc Tx-ualclCoxrib: XXXX Xxxaf xxxx 2CKXX 2ccxx 20aoc 2D= X=€ PG'E Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.1D 1.14 1.40 1.00 1.10 1,00 1.00 Cyc1.ICax PCE : 2== xx:= ' aD= ,C= >Ctxx aoaxc X-147)~ 2cxxc TrcklCmb PG'E : NaKb[c I_-cxx %Cocx DCK:a{ 2CKxX XMPcx >0= >o= Adj Val.: 25 0 4 U -0 0 '0 152 18 10 94 0 11 r-------____-- 11 ~ Critical Gap Mod-aIe: Poptlation: 300000 C< Run Spee+3(EIW)- 30 NPIi << - M,oveLtp Time : • 3. 4 x~= 2. 6 xxxx xxnacx xx=€ xxxx x2cKrx 2.1 xxxx xxxxx . Gr1 tical Gp : 6.5 xxxx 5.5 Xx]f7€x•xx]'Cx xxxux -nrxxx x 3-f,7C 3rsrxxx 5. 0 3x= ~ -__-_,.~--_...=,-t 11 11 H ~ Cagac±ty Module: Crr.fii-ct ►Tol: 2£5 xxxx 151 xxxx xxxx x~~= aOooc >ocxx xmaoc 170 xx3ot :xx3or Fotent Cap. : 744 x>= 1147 xxxx ~ Dr•-,~~ xxxx xxo= 1422 ,oc~Dc xxxxx Adj C ap : 0.99 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx X:!Dat xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxxc Mave Cap. : 738 no= 1147 ~c= xxxx xxx= xn~ xxxx >ooKxx 1422 =Cxx xK:?= , -----Y-------- ------a--_-.~r:- I 1f---LLaa------------------------ Level Of service Msadu].e : 4 Sto,pped Del: 5.0 xx= 3 _ 1 x:~v= xxxx xxxcx ~cssx x~= ~c~rx 2-5 xxxx xxxx-x ~ LO5 by Move : } * * * * * ~ ~ * A ~ ~ - Mavemexit : LT - LTR - RT I,T - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT ~ LTft - RT SharL-ci Cap. : xxxx 774 2coccc j%=j;x .~c}oc =o= xxxx x)= xcoocx acrnxc xa= 3ocxncx . Shrd StpDel :xxxxx 4.8 ~~x xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx ~ ~ xxxxx Jrxazed LAS: * A S AgpraachDel: 4-9 0_ 0 0.0 0.2 . Traffix -System VerBian 6.8 {c} 1995 DA Licenaed to Inland Facifia Eng J . . J. <r _ .7: '"a . . .e+. . . ~ Fri Aug 18 1995 09 58 04 Pag~e 20-1 , . TURTLE CREEK BUILD OUT WITHOUT PROJECT PM PEAK ' Level Of 3ervice Computation Report . 1994 HGM Unsignalized Method (Fliture Volume Alternativ+e) • **,t***,t*,ttr*twwt*,r*#**,t**,t~tt~t~tfx***,t,t,ttr****,t*****************,t****~ts*,t,t,t*,t*,t,t,t*,t ' f Intersection #55 3prague & Long ****,t*********tr*t***,t,t~~#,t*~ef~,t*,r*,ttt**~tr,ttrtfr*~~r**t***t,t*:tt*~t~*trr,t,t*~t,r,t~*~t:*+t,tt* • - A. /•a' ' Average Delay (sec/v+e.h) : 0.5 Worst Case Level Of 3ervice: A . ' ,►****t*t*,r:**~,►~**,~******************~*,t~t,t****t**~,r,t*,r,tw*,ttt*,t,r*~~r,t~,►*rt,tww*t**,r~ • ' ' - - Approach: North Bound 3outh Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R " Control: Stop Sign 3top 3ign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes : 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 ' Voltmee Module : ' Base Vol: 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 132 16 B 82 0 Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , Initial Bse: 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 8 84 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Eut: 21 0 3 0 0 0 0 136 16 6 84 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.69 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 PHF Volu23 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 18 9 94 0 ~ Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Vol.: 23 0 3 0 0 0 0 152 18 9 94 0 ~ Adjusted Volume M,odule: Grade: 0$ 0$ 0% 0$ $ Gycle/Cars : aoctiot xxxx >oooc >oooc xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx % Truck /Comb : Xoot xDCoc x~ocx XXoac Xooc X~ooc 20= 20= PCE Adj: 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 Gycl/Car PG'E : XXocx xxxx >ooac >oocx xx= 2ootx =11oc Xc~oc Trck/Gmb PCE: 'oocx MoQC xx= x0ooc XQCx 30ooc 3ocxc Xooc Adj Vol.: 25 0 4 0 0 0 0 152 18 10 99 0 Critical Gap Module: » Population: 300000 Run 3peed(E/W): 30 MPH « Mov+eUp Time : 3. 4xxxc 2.6 xxcxc xxxx xxxtx xxxxx xxxx =cxx 2.1 xxxx xxxxt Cri tical Gp : 6.5 xxxx 5.5 -oocXX xXoc >osx= XXXoc XooQC XQCXc 5. 0xxxc xocxooc ------------I 11 Capacity Module: Cnf lic t Vol : 265 xxxx 161 xxxx xxxx x=ogc xxxx xxxx ,C~Doc 170 xxxx xxxocx Potent Cap.: 744 xoQOt 1147 xxxx xxxx xocxxc xxxx xxxx xoQOOC 1422 xxxx xxoocx Adj Cap: 0.99 xoocc 1.00 xoooc xoQOC xooooc xxxx xxxx xxoosx 1.00 xxxx =otx Move C ap 7 3 8xoocx 1147 xxxx xxxx xxoQC xoooc >cocx xoaocx 14 2 2xocxx xxxooc ------------I Lev+el Of 3ervice Mcdule: - stopped Del: 5.0 xxxx 3.1 xxxxx xxxx xxoooc xooooc xoQOC xooooc 2.5 xooQC xxxxoc L03 by Move : • : * * * +t * ,r * p Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 9hazed Cap. : xooos 774 xxacx xxxx xxxx xooooc xxxx xoooc xooooc xxxx xxxx xxxsx 3hrd 3tgDe1: >ooosx 4.8 xootxx xxxxc xoooc xoooQC xoocxx xooc xooooc >oocxoc xxxx 'oooQc 3hared LOS: * A + ~ * * * * * * * " AprproachDel: 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 . Traffix 3ystem Version 6.8 (c) 1995 DA Zicensed to Inland Pacific Eng ~ -J), ~ J7 - S J . •f~ (l.. ' Parcel: 55194,0621 , Owner: TUCKER, STEVEN J CoOwner: , Owner Address • 18308 E 10TH AVE GREENACRES WA 99016-7737 Site Address , 18308 E 10TH AVE GREENACRES ~ r (D Legal Description ~ (D ~ TURTLE CREEK 2ND ADDITION LT 21 BLK• 3 I t'L L~JI '{Y', -,~~,1.~ R~rl~~+e kW- ~g -"rr ^ '•''`i~ ~~;~.f . F~ ~ ;ic.:. ' : ~ ' .~,i►n~..'hti,~,~;~ ~'`~+1, ~ i .•'"'k•,,,, ~ ' `'f~ ~t ~ ~ ~ i~ r,,► i i~~ d~ Notice: This is not a legal document. Data depictetl on this map is general & subject to constant revision. It is intended for reference use only. Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency. l_l 4'.• i.G !kr,~.- ~ ` i ! AV ~ ~I ~ ~ I I ! f ~ 1 ~f W ; ~ ~ ~ • V ~I- o7 ~ e i 7 S M 3 !a ' 3 ~I 4B, 2 IQ% 13 ' ~ . 8 ~ } ~ ~ I ~ Cr 13 14I5 r" M fsy. • ~~~~~f ~ ~J ~ ~ ti ai ~1 µ~b ~~I J 16 n'{'"' ~g . ~ ~ j 17 ig t xf H fE. rvq zi 11-50' ti ~ ~ { l , ~ I p I ~1`~ ' ~ : - ~ i ~ ~ I I:°~~. ~ . ~ kx~ ; P. f' P d ~r I I ' ry. ~I I ~N ' I;.rt4~Lr ~~~I I s•4~ ~ i ti..: • ; r~ ~ 1 01 , . . I ' ~i ;','y~ I~! j .E: ~4. No• F-055' .50 1.29-R=EM~~ Nt 'ZQ5 BT 'Jr4~ fCi r~,Y}j• r.,._ 601. _..e" ' _ 6N ~ . •GLT,15 ' • • ~~c !*:1] ~ ~ 4 $ ~J'S3i,3G~--------~~ t i 3 4 5 ia 7 e 7 ~ ~ 4 6 m T~y t~i T ~ F~5 ~~i 'l x~~~ I! 7~ 5 a b ~ L ' Z 2 ~ 4 5 II tY i ~ t ~y . • ~1 t:°~ ~4 3 1 a 3 y I 5 m ~ , ~e ~ 8 YA ~ ~.a ~ ~ ~ i 7_0 V~ ~ ~~o z9 zd zT zm x~ z4 z'S 32 s 0 ir ~ I ~ I f ~ ~ ~ ~o~ • i i4 i+'•.p ~~712 1 ~ a P1y r r~ xl + pl ~L r•. ! : . I , I ro 9 a Y~ ~ 5. i4. 32 I~ io A g ~ f 4 ~ ! . FINAL PLAT OF IOq'S QA71fICAiE AIRITqi'S INWO(R m[o ~ f ~ q~s~ g64 w o~1'1~~ cWNn woItu+ Py 90 TURTLE CREEK THIRD ADDmON • lRAim M M tL 1/1 Q i[CO[M IR L1YI, RIO[. RY. aauir ~cmww,.,-a.K,a ts~zo --_I------------------ I~ 7 1/. [UMLI 'C IY.M-~] 9tLo L ',,,'~o ::'y°.Mw`n.~'°`' u n"~`nni a[u MSI io oa aJ ~ I 7 J1 ~1 ' S ~ zm17/f•. I ~p / S!~ N'1TY. 1l7A0 ~4_'0' i67104f C 77Lq ~ L~ oYUIYL 2ll.oY oyW • _ E100 I➢M N~ 0.1W EIOR 77A7 `J ~'1 ti• Z%W IaG7 6fOG' J 1101r A Q~I ~ 11.07 I ~ 1 q,w¢ c L u~n'~'I~ $ 'I"^✓uvwr jj 4 ~ 1 ~ S.F. isai cr Z ~ Pv ~ B a ~ w N ti Fc ~ d ~r~ s n 4 v. „ 1au+ cr. iaev u K ; y Gleool C~OS~f ~ g l4J~! sI. a ~4om u. IO.oo7 67. C 14¢u s!. q 10]is v. ~ '41e~ 14 ry , Sr. a L a~ ~ I ~ Y [tU13 LiNli L I l 1 2 1 W 1 y' E 1 6 W> _ ~ L N 1 1 I G H I~!r. Llpll L1651/ EIlfU m Y wrvilf~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~~S ~ D' ►a L_ r,mu r m H~~ o 1_.._ - _MM . - --~.;M -u~ - ~ --ua--~---.~~ . cz A surnuaxn 9MAIHLE ~n~a•iri 1uro p ~ 71NCOUif rury'ij~. Jmdt sHar 6~ pwo suv to 30 o so 120 $ , W a SCFLL 1 6C rFCf I ~Y.f ' y ss~ 21, I ~ ~-eu J c~unnr-I Ia + reN ~b b " I~ _I J 1 ~ ~ `w.~r ~ ' ~ vg E ? 7 4 ~ 5 hF 5 ~cp' 7 18 k210. ~ i~ io i. a ~ 14 sr. ~ io. CIxu u Naxo u i• ioza v a- nae~ s+. ~ x~ ~ ~ I `ia si. . mw ir i Mma s.r. a ~ o $ 4 IECU9 MOPIPI~11 CIWI L1N1.imM EWOE LIO.U Gai7 ~ ~ Ct~N L11370 41sa WI.elSI. ~ fi4/. t10410 e • qi 0/1' KDAN A7 NL l0I GqaU15 ~ I?0)' Ln'1~1lR 1 1 M.lfNH"~ E?07 LIIDI7 ' Y: a 6 ¢ T ANO pAQlAT MKIL PoMI9 e~od oaaf 4 vinY rsm ~ ~ yov 6 ~ Iapy mm 0 fplMD 1/1' AmM W/f,I,t, l140[OR INIIp31lI IL7 Ofilf IfStC I aC15 MiT u0 QLdD AWI110x CI Af MAD ; 1 1 Y ~ ~z ! U K~. 71 wm.., us~a+i 0 wnwa1 h m m a aarauHt tl S~ ~ I wo ae rq ..vu, w 4x i ro~ W u K rAxo u rmM 11.39 5l. f] ~ g neerir. Y A ~I!{lAt, M "q f.vJa tiui~~ or a 3 I ii~~~ i/ ~aex u. 9 t w,e31 sf ~ 77 • ~ono v~ Sl .m4 sl. t.`au 1' euue t.am ~ 3 I ~ a t eauoMr u[ C ciaa uew g" t ro.ro ara u r ~ E ~t01W T 1 ~ y4~I~tl ~l/ ' ~ r~n~1Y i~a~sq~ fwX hqOeD/ I S~~ 1 1. N ` v M''' IM[i l' D `~N uNP t~aH+~ 7 U( P 16 ~ Iq~'~A14 , ♦ / ~ V l0A1Tf U!L.DIl Ytn ~ ~ I ~A{ ~~'511~~"rr ~ftl>I~149a1 ~~v~t+~ W ~ MJrn'ft ~ Y~~'~ Y19N11V ~ rY asat ♦ C~ ~ M~ ~ opiW~r~~G ~ i mm7 -'u.°.sya~. NT., ~`'uL'iIC'auin SA ' j`.nu nr+i~+ ~ 6 M f 7 g tC~ ~ ~ ' ~ Iwaw ` iJ°w.v' ~ b 1 77 g~ 76 30 29 F 8 79 qC% y ~Q000 Ff. tR1 •J. 1600D Sf. W 24 ! r ~ (R) I { 0A= a lICIRNG 7~ ( 31 nui:r. V 0.0 71~ mosr X' 1 a~ u GIN1r Claa! s tlUM s/. y~m E.1015 xdlX AIDMC M[ QNRAU[ 0r 6WtlR 10. P0l u L~ IIy ~ L~N71 CIL1 7 ~c4~} ro I IVf O MI{[ Q[U fP31 Afb lWl t' t leu] y .Od MM ?LLN M qp'~ QT Q i~ '6 d AOp1RKT 5TAIFYENT: 114W-~~RKfII'O~W~fM iNA~i1lui%. I~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1C1I• = I'e~ 8K~fYOtlOMlDV71GAlYCIYtNS11MN~ILY1 ~ E M,~I'W 1 ~ i U Rt - fNlReRD .f fpti RIG 9Af, BA.QiML Ib0 11Ld I . v~ i S. y I O 1111YL%SI Y[MOCl KM flC 113-I30-070 NRt C. a u yt9;fyy~ _tiu[ _ w.n •c . iz.e.s3 u I h .'"„'un • ~ Y iPA:i [ • ; n . . ~ ...,ore. ~e? auaXc7 ea+a+ urac iRtl:i'A' ~ nwo b sw. + a+ nm Cww«rr r"a nwue 3M,~}l6 i4 a». I, rwi uua a vn.WO B4~ awil I/FA '7f.11~. w~ t r ~ ~A.y. ~ ~.•w I ; " ~ aorn Lar.rto a wr m a~wax IT m At WR4 qi91 CML°14. \ ~ ~ ~ .1\b :I ~ ~ r h 1~271~lJ . I ~ . ` z 'x ww+wN[(autrrmauutacoHna t 19 ld \ 1+a~~ 5$ ~ 4i0:15~ i 14T6 L. 4 I y0{AM OA1W DRAINAGE EASEMENT ~11~\ m+►~ v uuu " ~1» , sr, iex» u. uraE TneLE °nqfi'\ a'0r ~saarrruriL I U[, d1ffMM 1 'OVGM I 1 Mf4pi3 1 $yll'1LY Yy,Y' !1 Yl OI UM0.P YY pp[~~l N ~ 01 I R➢I'U'IYY I 10w ~ I AO MAP CdNLR W 0E I WU1YU'f, I 1. G0 ~ OOMtlNNE1 I ~ORYMCL YMIMI160WWOAIBOrIY WI}N7WI O¢IMMCL 1 v , CnY.Wr ~ .,W - ` T ;~'46,2-. ` 20QW a I snw}rt l ro i oe ~ r,emr.at ~ xce ~ ~C~ ~ I oa 1 rusN~Tr I 4fm U~.'PI Rl llb m i xomY.e'L ~ urx i CURVETABLE aa i ~a.ruti ~ i. Irc i ua+s ~ uxc~~ 4, ouu , *17- YRLT IIMC JS.00' AC m i xnvnex i ixu' am• i m.n' I w»x ~ -Ksu~ w¢ ounu v~ Rc wA ooG w KO\ a I pni~✓. Olo li Sf!'11'Ilf[ I '~G,IY ~ I;pCp' ~ i~,e; I i+le'-Y ~ ` ~ p W A I U~ oi~ I xnnJ4T I !^S' OD' o ieC i eeYY.4• 0~7 I xn~C~7'w. ~ 1,w' ' pf~}pu" ~(jp.~a, I , Mrts ceMl ~ ou i xonrut i issr 6~~'+t'li'[ ; tM UY'CtlWfMIPfA ~W 011 YY SSlC gumpw~,tn,e, I I &fEi ►Taylor En6inocdng, Inc 2 oi~ xoniieY ~ u.ev ~ A ~ ~ ci.a w~L...e ~a n.wry me 01! 1 IGCII~CC li 10.lU~ EW~.nr~wM~~~ai Ndl o~~ i sn~rsrr ~ acY ~ (w~l ~u.m~ ru 1~1 323.9:. 2 07D I Y.MN 17'VI i 0 b ni I ~ruL s5o' ~ SE tG~U iR t~-fS-.! wuwen i un 19. ~ 20 u i~i : ae n saaT wl FWIL PLAi OF 30 r29 n ru atMK rVioi raim+ TIiTI1.E CFEa 1NiD AOOffION ~ 0 ~a . s-.,:,., r ~ , "+i ~:a~~.i''~ , `n~;a a~ ,-"~~~';r`"~~.. <:~_-~a•~.~;i i4~''? ' '1" , • '~'~~3F ` 'AD`1"~'~'~''"S?~f"~' s:.,r'ti. ~ ~ 1''t'r ,x ~s"i`.i ~~S..l ,.y3:.-~ a}~c , • ~ r', t~_zs~:... ~ . , , ' ` • s. y ' Washington State Eastern Region . ~~s• I` "'£~~~~4 ' 7rans ortation 2714 N. Mayiair Street ~:A~~ , T~ - = ° - ~ Qepartment of p ~ +',f '4• Spokane, WA 99207-2090 - T~r •'dY' K,1- Sid Morrison . , ;;;A ; .;,-;~:;a, Secreiary ofTransportation (509) 324-6000 . , {•r.~.~~;£+ ' : .~.~.~1, y~>_ • , , March 4Y 1996 : -r ~°sJ h Mr. John Pederson :s e_ ~ , ~ ` , •-y a~~.~`~.;'~,. , ?-y C~~. r+ se`-; :ic~' Spokane County Planning West 1026 Broadwa } :'•=1~`.~`4'°`,,-~"~`°~:.:'~ y Avenlle i~~iR 0 „{.Y~r' 4•,= ~~A.`t.,'~"."`6= . Spokane, WA 99260-0240 SPOKArJE COUNi't c~!CNE=R s' r'.3::i,r,'; • «d3 Re: Turtle Creek Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Mr. Pederson: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above Draft Environmental Zmpact Statement (DEIS). A.fter review of this DEIS the Washington State Department of Transportation has „ the following comments regarding this study: ~ • Over the last 18 months WSDOT has reviewed several traffic studies conducted for this 4. proposed development by Inland Pacific Engineering. As a result of the August 1994 traffic analysis and the projected impacts to the Barker Road/I-90 Interchange a Mitigated • Determination ofNon Significance (MDNS) was issued which the applicant and WSDOT •'f~{k ~,`i concurred with. In this a eement, the aPPlicant a~eed to desig~ fund, and construct a ti..~~. traffic signal at the Barker Road and eastbound I-90 ramp terminals. Due to these previously established thresholds regarding mitigation in the 1994 MDNS, and the,:fact . A'i•~q+ 1` TM a 4~ ~ that the project has not changed significantly, the same mitigating measures are: appropriate for traffic impacts to WSDOT facilities. This fact is recognized on Page 55 of:~..f~ the DEIS, as mitigation that could be required of the Turtle Creek~roposal. A. 'r , . . ~j~ Attached to this DEIS as Appendix C we found attached a copy of the "Barker Road Traffic Impact Analysis and Corridor Stud}~" which we have had several concerns with and have not accepted this corridor analysis. -However, WSDOT concurs with the mitigation on Page 55 of the DEIS, provided the applicant agrees to design, fund, and construct a i~~ ~ traffic signal along with the associated improvements at the Barker Road and eastbound I- wj-:? 90 ramp terminals. . ~ If the aPPlicant or lead agencY desires to change the mitigating measures Presented in-this-. DEIS we would ask that a Supplemental Draft EIS be routed to all affected agencies to;"=~ .z.w . . ensure the proposed changes could be reviewed prior to the issuance of a Final EIS. • ;~,iki..{F.: ss•~,. 'z L.• ; ~ i 'r•,t' ~.Y~,' . .t :~i?• .rt•s7`~s', w~~ ♦0~~i`.~'PS _h.tx~J r .1 ' - ' " _'~x ~ 3 ^ r t• { "t ~ - Mr. ,Pedersan , r MarGh 4. 1996 ' = r~=+~ ~`.~s _ •,t~.. ~~ge 2 ~ .A ~y~~~i~',5~~~„j~x+'- 1~~ • ' `]'rSi" ~ ~•.~:~~~"~~.~r`4y - - 'Ff •~s~ "~i , ~(•4 xf yau have an u~estians re ardir~the abov~ lease feel free to contact Leon~-d Y ~ ~ ~ P Cash in='~r~ Regj1JlYCi1 Pl ~ ifi.,r~.e~ ~F]-ni31~ OffiGe at 324-6199. } S1nGeT"e1y, . a ~~F~ „ ~;~.•'~~~?:r.,. i ~ l;-~'~' _.u^{i,fati•r~t~w 4 - -~2:=n +n'a.~ ~ • . ;.va* i_;~.~1$]j s ~EAs:~~k r,•3~,. 1~ ' 3 I _ ~ . ~'d`~l ~ e~.. 5• LE/""~~yr y''~yTT i '~11 1:! ~a• • ~`r~~. V i ; ~ Lr [ 1~1 Y~ • ~nI . Regionai Pla~nning Engineer ~ - ~~~A- ~ ~ JCL ` LCLIigj1 4 cc: Pat Har-per, Spokane Caunty Engineers ~ . . . ~r •_Yfr.~ . ~ - . • 4i~~~ - • °5' ft~ i71~ J~ " ~ i•*.~ . F }r.~ .+Z . . 'L1 7t i {p • n~i 5 • , rt~k~-~-S ~ ~Y•~x~~ ~ ^ ~ • n, ~ , r ~4'_ Y,• - oi~ry. ~ y ~;yys,, . a r 'r~,~" a~~n'. Fs'~e.••?'.:h I : `~Z'~Y ,~t4 .~1 ~~t"{', ~t .{'`-~a' 1~~,,~>'~2+~+~'3-i".• .`0 ~ • ,~C i~, s` r}rf . `P~rya.. ~3r,},lN~yr„tJ,~s~•:. : •t ' _`:~,,~~-~.'rf.~ `'I ,J . b~t'~~`' z~ <I: ~'P,; 7 txY t_."~'~+~?°a' v'`~,;=-. • •r~g_"Y ~ y~ M,s ; k~~ ~•,1'`oc.,,:;~i ~~`~Y'~'~"`.~=t'`:r.Y,.} E ;:~b• . ~i. ~-`s~`,;~~~:'i•'~, r•;:.a ~,~ts; i• ye;.s~,c.?',y-:e~,t° -~l t• `v-yy';'~y,.$ ~ r E MEMO . •F;~~~a ; t ''S • _ .-~••r'!M'+~~t , , ; r.~,~ ~it, K ' ~ i TO: John Pederson> Senior Planner> Division of Buildin and Plannin - 7"'~`~• g g A ~ • i ~ : " 1 . 'j ~ _y y _ } A ReFR4M: Pat Harper, Transportation Planning Supervisor, Spokane County Engineering ~',F.`'-~' . . . 1S ' t •'4~.,~15 ~ DATE: March 4. 1996 = . •1 ~y'~ ~ • . y ~Y'(I!~p`" ~ =~:y~ '°tr;}'/ 1.~~'-r`7✓~ SUBJECT: Turtle Creek Dra.ft Environmental Impact Statement +~t0. f~' FILE: Turtle Creek Draft Environmental Impact Statement This project has been reviewed regarding its traffic ixnpacts on several occasions. A 1Vlitigated Determi.nation of Non-significance was issued on this same project and the applicant previously ."~`::~:;-►i~ agreed to off-site mitigation which was the following conditions: - = - Phase I. The applicant shall pave Long Road and build t.he pedestrian walkway in Phase I of the proposal as delineated in the Preliminary Plat of Record. ~ Phase II. The applicant shall install a new ttaffic signal at Barker Road and the Eastbound (south) I-90 ramps. The applicant shall be responsible for design' funding and 'v'•-:J~t~jJ. construction of the traffic signal along with imProvements associated with the traffic . ~L:~:',•~ 1.. 4~/~signal. The traffic signal and improvements shall meet WSDOT standards. The applicant shall place 10 % of the cost to upgrade the traffic signal at Barker Road and Appleway in an escrow account managed by Spokane County for future upgrades to the :n~~ 'rS . w - signal at this intersection. • .1b~nC.rf.fyTJ_I Phase III The applicant shall submit plans for review and approval by the County Engineer for the improvement of Barker Road from Eighth Avenue to Appleway and construct to a width of 32 feet. " . Y I ,ro ♦ . y The aforementioned MDNS conditions were attached based upon a fixaf~'ic analysis for just Turtle - Creek in a report submitted in August 1994. It would seem that this was an already established parameter for this project and at a minimum this projects responsibilities would include these as mitigating measures. The need for widening of Barker Road was related to safetY concerns . regarding non-vehicular interaction with increased traffic generated by this proposal. . S , i • ~ .S I ~ ~yt~.JJ 53On the 20th of December 1994 the Board of County Commissioners in a decision on this proposal requested that one of the items to be addressed regarding traff'ic concerns by the Board:'~~~;"..~•,~`~- ' ywas as follows: "4. The traffic study conducted by the applicant does not adequately address the impact~ of the proposal on Long Road, including its intersections with Appleway and Sprague." "The study fails to take into account school traffic taat will be generated on Long Road '•3_' during the school season, and fails to adequately analyze mitigating measures for the , •;.°n,.i,X~?~~'~~Si~ . . " ` ' ` ~t, '•x= %r'`u" ~4`~=r 1`:" ;r'• ^ a! - . . ~ : J''~, 4j' ~r~ +:~,r,.,r tt L' r"~• . 1-., . ~ .y~ T+i~tL~J'•~ ti~.J• • r,~i~ ~~~Z j"1'~1~1~ ~~~.~1~r~v:y . i.=?' - ~ ~~7 +,^U'~:C•` s i ~ • ;.•y.~' •.'S"!~ ~ r~+~~'y=~,~ • et~i Y4S`+~'••T•~;ap%'2;'4r,s,, ' ,~r.stit' • ,F~'' ;y-"' ~~c: t c~•:i~:,•' problem intersections on Long Road." • ,~;,,4= Since this was an issue of Board concern in the original submittal it should be also addresse&.,'-`;=~ W specifically in tlus environmental document. • . , . ~ A~~ „ « } 4~-~p b1~ ? As was addressed in the Morningside Heights Draft EIS Spokane County Engineering would',noV-- ,~•'~1 FP'./ ,c:.-C'~ p~'T i"~t: • "I at this tune recommend the formation of a Traffic Mitigation Impact Area. These Impact ~ p.,~'"~• y`~ ° ~•~'~M1N1~"'=11ji~.~ must be formed by the Board of County Comrnissioners as was done in the Liberty Lake area. '•:~.~.1 4 r~ ,.~rl the case of Liberty Lake approvals of both land uses and plats had been done over a period x'~- •p..~.;., . , be innin in 1977 until resent and a roval g g p pp s of building permits were contingent upon a • ~••.~~4J' ~~,,r_` Ty',w,"'3• .G^C coming together of all parties within the area. This is not the case with Turtle Creek ~:t~~~>~~~Y ~y~~=~ , Morningside Heights, Meadowview Ranch Estates, these are all still subject to the land use ` ~ s;,,, t ;1~ • ~ , , • .j.,,. ~~il;~. :,.~.i: • = process. Calculations for mitigation fees must be based upon known projects that have received . at least preliminary approval. Therefore any reference to use of Mitigation Impact Area for this . project is only for discussion purposes and this projects' mitigation is directly related to ~ improvements required based on impacts. •,t. . , Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Draft EIS. 'y •,•'>,r `.s~ • a :r . , ~~j • ~ • • dt ~'r~ ~ , . ~.~~'1?~ bY'~~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5•~, ~t 4' `61~ , ~ F~ ~r .p . . • ~ ~ ' ,5.: , :;,~,~.',~4~;c . • t: " ~1;~~ N • 1rAh 4t~~l.'p j _ ..~'',1~~ ~ Y• ' . = 1 '~i . . ~-;~r~, y,,aY* ~"2 j~~.•,`r~:..~; r J ~ ~ C • ' r ~ ~ =i~ a;,:, ' •'~-~a".f . . C • •.M: HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SP-AP-F3.HC0 Page 1 Spokane County Engineers Transportation Planning - , 1026 W. Broadway Ave ' Spokane, WA 99260-0170 . ~ ~ . . Ph: (509) 456-3600 - - - ~ y: - Streets :(N-S ) Sprague/Corbin (E-W) Appleway/SPrague Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst sds Date of Analysis.......... 7/3/96 ' Other Information......... Existing conditions factored +30 (1$ ea ch yr for 3 yrs) Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection I Eastbound ~ Westbound I Northbound ~ Southbound ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R ~ L T R No. Lanes I 1 2 < 0 ~ 1 2 < 0 ~ 0 > 1 < 0 ~ 0 > 1 < 0 Stop/Yield I N I N I Volumes ~ 1 6 537 1731 3 554 61 86 1 41 13 0 0 PHF 1 .9 .9 .91 .9 .9 .91 .9 .9 .91 .9 .9 .9 Grade I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 MC's I I I I SU/RV's ($)I I I I Cv's I I I I PCE's 11.10 11.10 11.10 1.10 1.1011.10 1.10 1.10 • , ~ , • ~,,bi Adjustment Factors r . Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turri Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 ~ . , . ~ Y.~ ~ iJrC~..y .-,?j. ' ~ l.;~•. •'_'~~~+~~i~ , _ • ~ . ~m ~ .;m~r'~T,s~ , ~:r•~_ • ~ - d " ~ ±,r Z , - , _ : qd~;,~;y~;` •rs~"° - :~f~ a; r ~ • r' 1 , ~k1~d . ~[fs~• HCS :Unsignalized Zntersectiorrs Release 2. lc SF-AP-F3. HCb Page 2 J WorkSheet for TWSC Inter~~ctzon , - ~ . rry3 • Step 1: RT frorn Minar Street NB SB CD][~~lict].1lg FIC1wS : (vph) 312 #~:,"~~'t Potential Capacity; (pcph) 874 952 Movement Cagacity: (pcph) 874 952 Prob, of Queue-Free 5tate: 1,00 1.00 Step 2: LT from N1a] o,~ Street WB EB Conflieting Flows: (uph) 789 623 Potentaal Capacity: (pcph) 646 794 Mavement Capacity: (pcph) 646 794 Prob. af Queue-Free State; 1.00 4.99 Step 3: TH fram Minar Street NB 5B ,y.-- ~k~.. ConfJ.icting F'tows: (vph) ~ 1325 1416 *6 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 183 161 ' Capacity Adjustment Factor - due t a Impedi ng Movements 0.99 0.99 Mauement Capacity: (pcph) 180 159 Prob. of Queue-Free 5tate: 0.99 1.00 5tep 4: LT from Mznor 5treet NS SB --------------aa~--------------------------------------- Conflicting F1aws: (vph) 131$ 1227 Potent3a1. Capacity: (pcph) 152 174 Maj or LT, Minor TH Irnpedance Factar : 0.99 0.98 Adausted Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.98 y=¢ Capaczty Adjustment Factor due to Irnpeding Movements 0.99 0.98 k=~• Movement Capacit Y: (pcph) 150 1~1 Z . Intersection Perfvrmance Summary a: Avg. 95% r, Flow Move Shared Total Queue Appraach ftate Cap Cap ❑elay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (seclveh) (veh) (sec/veh) a------ ,-_-r-.~. TT--°, a ~ NB L r~ NB 1 1 18V > 155 76.3 5.8 F 76-3 ND R 4 874 ] : ~ { g A ~ 15 171 i ~ •'~;`NiN SB 1 V 159 > lf1 23a1 0.2 D 23.1 J - • T~ i~ SB R Q 962 > E{y L7 L T 8 794 4.6 lI ('~.U (ry A 0.0 . •4• :,4','sl~~~ YYD L 3 646 5.6 0.0 B 0.0 Intersection Delay = 5.3 sec/veh ' ~x ~'~'T ~ ~'-.r..~.'i;• ~'d- - 1+y~~~ 'Vdi( F'-' ~'y~"~ ~ • !r' "~t~ ~ r ` ' a P`~ + f;~ • e HCS:Unsignali.zed Intersections Release 2. 1c SP-AP-EX. HCO Page 1 . . _ Spokane County Engineers Transpbrtatian Pl~nning ~ . , 1026 W. Braadway Ave ~ - Spokane, TjqA 99260-0170 Ph: (509) 456-3600 • ,~~~~+,}~j . - i ~ Streets: (N-S) SparaguelCarbin (E-W) ApplewaylSprague ,x Major Street Directian.... EW 4 S Length of Time Analyzed.. . 60 {min} AnaJ.yst . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . sds Date of Analysis.......... 7!3/96 - flther ,Information......... Existing conditions for pm peak Two-way Stap-control,~ed Tntersection ~ Eastbound ~ Westbound I Northbounr_i I Southbounci ~ TJ T R ~ L T R ~L T R 'L 'Y` R ~ ~ ~ 1-•___ ~ _-w_ No . Lanes f 1 2 C0 J 1 2 < a ~a > 1 < 0 ~ D > 1 < 0 StoplYield I NI Nf I Voluraes J 6 521 1681 3 538 61 815 1 41 13 0 0 FHE' 1 .9 .9 .91 .9 .9 .91 .9 _9 .JI .9 ,9 .9 ~ Grade F 0 I 0 ~ Q MC'S I I I I sr.r1RV` ,g (%)J ! I I CVIs I P I ~ PcE's I1.10 11.10 I1.10 1,10 1.1011.10 1.10 1.10 ~r r, t Adj ustmerit Factors -~'j~• ` J ~ L Vehicle Crxtical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) 'F _ _-------------------------------,-4----__-- - ~6 ~ Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 ~ R1ght 7'i1r'I7 M1T1QZ' RQad 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Mznor Road 5D 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.60 3.40 t- Kf . , 4 ~ `JY~J x_ 't d T . , . - ' ~i"^• S K~ i,;, '~"ZRI,Y• SrS-y ~1!.=•~ . `•~T' ~ • ' "y:.A'~~~'~~` ~y~~ F • ~ ir r-~r' d ~ ' . . ~I~ir~q~~ - y•_ . • ~r~ ; : ~ HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SP-AP-EX.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection _ . Step 1 RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows . (vph) 383 302 ~ %~`i'~`~ . Potential Capacity: (pcph) 886 973 ~ Movement Capacity: (pcph) 886 973 - Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1.00 1.00 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 766 605 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 665 812 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 665 812 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 1.00 0.99 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1288 1378 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 192 170 . Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.99 Movement Capaci.ty :(pcph ) 189 168 Prob. of Queue-Free State: 0.99 1.00 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1280 1190 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 161 184 ~ Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 0.98 -r;'?, Movement Capacity: (pcph) 159 180 fj I ~ Intersection Performance Summary Avg 95$ F1ow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) NB L 106 159 > NB T 1 189 > 164 64.8 5.1 F 64.8 ~~'rnd NB R 4 886 > S B L 15 180 > SB T 0 168 > 180 21.8 0.2 D 21.8 S B R 0 9 7 3> EB L 8 812 4.5 0.0 A 0.0 WB L 3 665 5.4 0.0 B 0.0 Intersection Delay = 4.6 sec/veh ` r4;t d , J- y - ' ~f \~f{~: #Z-T~r,~~~`t~~i_ 2 q ~ , ' - ~,;,:s;~?i'.£~'-t •{h y✓.ry r{, I~li,- a;.' `S~~.tRi•hF~•, _ • • ~1 .S ,4lV MEMORANDUM ••~p~~^Y ` * DATE: July 3, 1996 . - - i - • ' ;k''^,~.i:''~ TO. • P21t H5rper ~ , ' , •:„e ..r'- ' a FROM: Steve Stairs RE; Revievtir of Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat Final EIS SI''MNECOWY . Ihave reviewed the Final EIS (draft) along with the Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat file and have noted the follouving comments and questions: _ 1.S-8 and page 46 report additional traffic for the next 3years from these projects: 120 SFDIJ from Rivenlvalk 35 frarn Illleadawview Rarrch Estates 120 fram Marningside Heights . 40 fram Nfieadawvievv Terrace . 315 Is this scenario comparable to the 360 lots analyzed in phase 1 af Appendix C? The reported levels of service do not match far the studied intersections. If this is a separate analysis, documen#ation shauld have been Pravided. { +d T}~'A 2. Sprague and Appleway is a scoped intersectian in the Turkle Creek DEIS, but na supporking informa#ion for the reported resul#s is pravided in the DEIS or Appendix G. 3. This DEIS uses a different me#hodofagy, HC1VI `94, tv determine LOS than Appendix C which Freparts from HCM `85 methods. This is clearly recagnized in the DEIS, however, since Apperrdix C is provided as suppott for the aElS, these twa documents must coincide. r-til Obviously, calcufations using the HCNi `94 methodologies vxrere performed to report levels af ra~~ :n _ service in terms of delay for the DEIS and complete dacumentation shvuid have been pravided in the technical appendix. '-4. Page 48 states that 3 alternatives (propased, laurer density & no action) have been anaCyzed as part a-f the Barker Raad `filA & Corridar S#udyr. Although not specifically s#ated, ! assume that since phase 1, in Appendix C, uses 360 Iots it provides the analysis required for the propased and lower density scenarios. There is na direct support for levels of senrice in Appendix C with the "lawer density" alterna#ive. 5. The "ino action" alternat€ve fevels of service shQVUn in Table 9 af the DElS are not consistent ...,`r' with thase reported in Table 8 of Appendix C. 6. All of #he statements found in Sections 2, 1.b.1,2 and 3 of the DEIS with respect to the northbound leftr NBL, at Sprague and Appleway are misleading and should be deleted or - •,2; ,r.:,, , . . . •„pr„ 4t",. ~ • ~ . , i}~` F~• , t . r - J ' `•,';.:v . ' T , •1.p ' addressed completely and accurately. For example, page 50 of the DEIS reports NBL delay increased from 62.8 seconds to 101.2 seconds even though only 5 more cars were added to . this movement, only 2 of which are from Turtle Creek. In fact, even if no more cars were added •p ~ to the NBL movement, additional delay would be experienced as a result of increased traffic - volumes for all of the other conflicting movements at this intersection. . . . . Left turns from minor streets at two way stop controlled intersections have the lowest priority of movement. This means all of the traffic returning to Turtle Creek from the West in the pm peak ''y. . (35% eastbound right and the remaining 65% eastbound through not to mention the westbound through traffic) helps degrade this NBL movement at Appleway and Sprague. The left turning vehicles in and of themselves do not create the delay. They must wait for available gaps which have been used by the increased traffic in total. Attached to these comments are LOS print-outs of Sprague/Appleway for existing conditions and factored growth of 1% per year for 3 years for all movements except the NBL. The resulting delay increased from 64.8 seconds for existing conditions to 76.3 seconds for the factored growth condition. This is an increase 11.5 seconds even though no new cars were added to the NBL movement. Clearly, NBL movers are not the sole source for increased delay. 7. The letter from SRTC, dated August 30, 1994, provided with the response to letter number 11 in the FEIS, states no air quality analysis is necessary. Was this determination based on the initial Turtle Creek Threshold Analysis submitted by Todd Whipple of IPEC dated August 4, 1994? The Barker Road TIA & Corridor Study analyzes many more trips but does not mention any results of air quality analysis. , . The following are comments specifically addressing the Barker Road TIA & Corridor Study submitted as Appendix C to the Draft EIS. : 1. IPEC traffic counts at Appleway/Barker are 15.6% less than counts performed by Spokane i 1-r 4 r County on 4/22/96. 2. Several technical discrepancies have been noted with the Barker Road Traffic Impact Analysis & Corridor Study (Appendix C to the Turtle Creek Draft EIS, Appendix D to the Meadowview Terrace Draft EIS, Morningside Heights EIS and I assume all other projects in this area) by various agencies and citizens of Spokane County. Many of the discrepancies were reported in the form of response letters. Comparing response letter items and responses by IPEC, it appears that none of the previously noted discrepancies have been corrected. In fact, the only change made appears to be the cover pages and date. .J l~ If errors and/or omissions are known by the author(s) and it is not desired to rewrite the study, then at a minimum, an errata document should be submitted with the study correcting such r errors and/or omissions. 3. Bullet #4, page 35, states a 12 year background traffic horizon, yet page 37 states a 10 year build-out period. All calculations were based on a ten year time frame. 4. The lane configurations for LOS calculations of Appleway/Barker at phase 4 and beyond are . , incorrect. Phase 4 analysis shows the affects of NBL channelization rather than the SBR 2 ~ _ -r..~,.,•• y.rs.-,ti. .,ti;,~ < ♦ . ~ , ' f " - ~ _ _ , . channelization stated in the text. This lane configuration error was continued in the subsequent , phase analyses. ;i . 5. Page 23 of the Barker Road TIA & Corridor Study states that the 1985 version of the ,T- . :..•ti. Highway Capacity Manual, HCM, is more conservative than the 1994 HCM with respect to LOS A • - i ~ calculation. This statement is provided without basis. No assumptions or other methodology is given to back up this statement. To determine which is the more conservative approach, `85 vs. • : : ,`94, I analyzed several of the intersections using `94 HCM methods and counts provided in the study. Comparison of the results provided the following: (1) All way stop controlled intersections (4 way stop) LOS are calculated the same in `94 HCM and `85 HCM. (2) Two way stop controlled intersections LOS using `94 HCM were lower than '85 HCM. This is primarily due to the difference in gap acceptance values between the two versions of HCM. Due to these results, `85 HCM cannot be considered more conservative for all analyses. (3) Signalized intersections LOS comparisons showed mixed results. This is most likely due to the lack of signal timing information and assumptions provided in the LOS calculation printouts making replication impossible. 6. Traffic from Cataldo Ave is not shown in Figure 8& 9. 7. What happens if, for some unforeseen reason, the proportion of SFDU north and south changes drastically? How does the proper mitigation get called for then? -A • .Zi / ' Ckh}t . ,r ! i 4 ; 3 • ' : ~i~ ; s~ -~~~~e ~~~~.;*4:a~, r-+ ~t g- ~ t•f=X ~ • - . ~i~~y{. {~"~~~~''-l~.~y.~,~~'~: i'~'~~_'~'.~T}.II h~ ~~~:i~~y}'.y,-~' i~7~= + , 'r `~`.ff~yiai~•'~~'!•'r~ ~,~+P~f• i y°6 s~ ' ~ { f5,'h'i~r~- f~~ ~ •i:~'~4 r;t` .9i.F , . .~'w~,„j 2''~~' fT~ : ;~F~:~: r~-'• S •e -'?1,~~s~fFt_, `5 ~i ANS€y~''~ .~•d# ~~y~S Y po r County ' blic Works,, D o ~'t• {l, # o * - • * d or i R . Y i •~1 r Y'~j}-~0 V _ ' • - ~'T'w~~ , . ~ Mem 0 To: Jahn Pedersan, Seniar Planner, Div. 0f Building and P!anning - From: Pat Harper, i rans~portation Engineenng Supervisor cQ Turtle Creek EIS - Oatm J uiy 12, 1996 - Re: Camrnents on Final Turtle Creek EIS ~ . ~ ~ John, revieuving the response to our cvmments vn the Turtfe Creek Preliminary ElS we fnd the respanse unacceptabip, The EIS fiar Morrringside Heights EilS addressect needed impravements ta Barker Road and the intersecton of Barlcer and Appleway signal upgrade. The wid'ening of Barker } TF4A~^l.Ji,~" oa provides for the safety ❑f peclestrians aidng the Barker Raad Corhdor which this project wiil be - contrrbubn9 si9nrfr,ant. trips to. The upgrade vf'the si9nal afi Barker and A fe~vaas alsv revious RP v3r P lY commitked and agreed ta by the applir,ant. 7rn1ng of this f nai EFS +s for the record after the appraval of Mamirxgside Heights, therefare cumuiative impacts from Mamingside Heights are also ~F-ripactng the Barker Raad corridar and clearly shouid be addFessed. - - - - - - L , ' ~h ~ i . a~. U;r ~ ! f ~ .~Tr ~ • _ +4.'/~~.'S 7 - ~ f _ }h i ~ T ~ - • ~ ~ 0 Page I ' . - ~•u#•'t~,~r.'~r~f,'T-~;-a ~'.a~ . s2~'7 ij - ~ - ~ r :ti~`•`~.-,-,, - ~ . •4 ~ i~ ' ` ~ a. _ l Cr~~c c/ rl~ j 1 f . . ~ ~ ~~f'~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ +.,/~~r7 {~~f~ F I` ~~~y V~~~1/ i ~ •$~'~~i ~ n ' I I . Y i r ~S $ . . a ~ , - ~ f ' ! • J ~ - . . - ~ ~~~/j_ :+qf} f{/ fJ'J }ff y{~~f - - - . . - - ~ , s - - - ; ~ . , . , . . got-) do et.,I - Is ~ ~ ~ &w ~ ~ k ~ . Q~~ Cwr k-~r~~ F Y~ ~ . ~ leS _Ad ~ ~ • ~ r^4i.~ i i ~ ~rc-~~ , ~ ' ~ y r.-~~ ~ i c ~ ~ ~ ~ "L~~1- ~ft~ ~ e~~~ ~ ' r f +~~''t f:'tt' ~ ~ i /I ~ ~v," di"~f f~`s-~~1,~ ~ ~y~~►~~ -P 607,d ~ ~ 5 ~~S) Sl07` 160~a A_N k: ~ ~ ~ ~,:•r~ , ~ ` f ~ ~s y1 v~V,4'6 t'< ~ ~',,,~A~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ i jj~5`'"~°~• },~~y~~~y '+1}r~ i ~ + ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~f~~ ~~'r+ ~ V ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~~•4 ~ ~ ~tiP Py~ ~ r.f~ • ~ ~ 4.r 1Vr ~ ~~i~' ~ .~11 .ti~ly~.~~ ~ I ~ ~ • ~ ~ i : 6 ~ ~'•s:t4r-. ~ . ~ r. , . Q 6 i ~ i . !s ; ~a - I WY ♦ •95 r,~y ' 4'-j-`'~"f ~ ,j • Y i~- •5 RZ .4 ' ~ ~~.J~~ h/'~~f,~.~~~,~~IL ' . . ~ :✓W~ " y:°''rt~ 14 lY - • 1 . . . t~ ~Y~~'~• ~ ~G~~ 1 ~ L ~ ~ < - . • ~ r,~•,~ . _ . . ~ / / 1 • ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f G / f t o'j'I TY~ ~ -Fcs~' v~ e.X T" . ~ ..e.~~ ~ ~ .-F: wF~ . . . . . . K- . 1 f f dt~ ~ ciy".` . . . . - - ~ . -~.r~~.-~ . : . . Q 7 ktil t a G UL~ V , r e,uo _ .~i'rc`Ge , . - - - . , 3r5 . _ Qb `C S G'►'1 C,.- fVZ2~~ `V'+ ► G!' S . ~ r ~^s~- 1-Il~~ ~s C ~ r'7" ! ~..G ~ r,~-~-~ ~s e ~:~i~ _ . ~ ~ • , - - ~I✓~~ ~ Cd'ee,. G~'~ c/) - • . . C cj v- _L2l ~ _5 ~r f .~~„~,~";S'~~ 1~ c~-~~ j~ lC:~~~r~ , C ~ ~ ~2ti~ . , ; ~ :q ~r , - - - . a;A ~ ~C.•- -~~S ~h ~ ~ C~- l ~-~jr,~ C ~-2. S 04 C~, t d~ . S ~xc Sf.ri ce boco , • ~ , ~ -z 4~,_' K-e- i ~ , Ir i -.2/~ ylL ~ ~ u!S T - . . . i'U re~)d S 'p- cl cW-?" ~ ~ . !'t'c~l s. 1 :17f+A 60S / lc . ~p 1 !ra] d~tsz-t~c ! C..~7"/-•P~,oYZ G~`~"( yt, _ v-e ~s 6 ~ v,c -C S~~r I ) l~'' I G`~ Cr l ~ v ~ 1 i 1 C! ~ .L 1 4 . #',~s ~s' ~ F i • . '~~`.y w'~~~i:~3 ; r~ ~ ~.'r~t~,~~ :y'.; ` • ( t b ~M' ~ ~se,..,. • w , ~,ti~~:;~.:_~:,~-•~; • , ~ - . ? ,,~•,n^"`~ ;y. I ~ ~ . ~ ' ` ' ~ f .-.:A.. 'y,, ! t~~~ C/ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ G•~.' ~ ~ ; :'F~ : _ • ~ ' . . ~ ; i 7k 1 S ~f f1~ ~ S 1-a r - . ...r ( ; ' • v'_ c= . ~if~. , ~ K4 ~ ~ . . . _ - . . .i.~ti..e.~ .i. . ~ 1~113L a ~ ~ J c v~ r}; .,/i~ Cl l S iq c,. 1 • 1 ` ~ . ~ ~ . ~ /l v-,.; ~ ~ ~ ~,,.d b _ , . `•.n- ~e~'f c+'1r, (,,,~v ~ ~ L ~ c,~'/~' yG3 f~••=r~ y --j-r~; r~,~~ J~w~ E ~ / / ~ • '~;'x I G~- iC~~ ~ C~"~ l.~st ~ ~.2.~.5 ~ { 7~'~ . - -~yG~ ~9 ~ ~ ~ ..~~.,~n J~_ ~ ~ ~i~. ~~~t ~u~ ~ tQ t^ ~r~,~P.. "1 ~~1. ~E`,d ~ S~4 S' f G~-~ 0 ~~l ~ i~ ~ G r t,T d~ Ei~t~`Lne~r«c'+~', ? ~'`r~„~~~~~ 9 e-4 A A Icv r.,.. , ~ • • 1 ' J),, ~ 1 ` S rJ ~'L SC- ~ `~+C/ 1-7 ~ • ~ f : 1 G„~,,:~'C, ~r s ~ _ v~✓~ ~ ~,~s 6 15 ~ . . ~ . ; ~ ~ VIV1 4 r~-1 ~ ~ ~ ~a - ` ~.v~ -~rn ~L•1 G-~", dvl C~~ f.-c c~ ~ ~ ~ ~r/~r ~.~tn'G- ~C~ . _ F ~ • ! - ~ - ~=t__ ; c~r,-.~"c1 l1" C•.Q, ~ G..~ ( C YG c,~ i ~ ; S _cd lt' K 5 4-4 L ~ 7/ ~ Y'i~ !,1 ~ l C 1 C t'1 P(. f~ t G~+' U'/. ~ G-',~ 71~t ( t ,~•1 -P/'/ ~M / r/~l ; . . • ~~sy ~ -n r r~;. ~ ; a • t 1 i . l RM~. k, ~ . c~ - " : .o •..r:: u,.,+fF~,;d~ 6,~:. i r I j ~V~• ~V ~/~Jf~i4J~~ ~~~`"`~I,+,r~_t. rwt~ • T'.' ~ ~L' S J. ' ! ~'~z.G~ ~ ( c~~ ~:..~Nh-' l~. ~ ~~,~G G~cr-~c~._~=~ v~"~~~• ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~~~r~~.~~~:~ C.-Y ~-~c~c...-~~ . , ,m=~~ ~ • ~ ez~ii G..l Zt S !~-t.G-~:n U aS C:2/0 cr's t7A ~ ~~•~d"4 ~t ( . .R ~ ~ E t ~ . w: t'.•~' F R.! f ~~Y1 r " i u~ t ~S~FY•~ i ~ •~~c~,, L ~kh~ ~ %to~ '10 ' ..J1• . Iiry . • 'rd~ + ' ~T4 1 ' i. . ' ~ . . - ~ ~ . i 'y~+;~•Y.~~' 9 ~ • - - - - ~'-+-a • _ ~V~l:s~LCi 7 `y.'~ , •;4 i ~ . t • ' 'Iaylor Englneernor. Inc ~ P~' p* ' Civil Design and Land Planning ~ ~ ~ X ~ -PTI" 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2322 lz" 22 J, flu 1 b S. P05TA-ac - F-$--5~4 6 as UU 370 ,;UL-72 2003 - City of Spokane Vallev 1 a;AFRGM ZIP CX)OE 994 a i 1170 'L". G,Drague Ave Redwood Office Building Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Cie/ V ~ JUL 2 3 ~ C'. _ - t~' af s paka'V ."'~i~.~r~:~'t~ „ ~ ! !t 1 ilti t ~li.]l~i4l2 !2!1 S3 !14 ! 1 lE ft t ~ Taylor Engineering, Inc. :w~ , _ A► e~~~ Ci«1 Design and C.and Planning k,._~ ~ 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2322 0 U• S. PQSTAG-E-,__" 5 T~ 0 37b 9 3 c G 0 3 ~ f 7 c ~~EK; FRV,,,,~ - ,rp C~ , y et~ ~ Sandra Raskell City of Spokane Valley C:: CC ~ 11707 E. Spra9ue Spokane Valley, Wa 99206 AUS I Cety of va~9ay i tf1l11+ltit~Idtit(ll fitil:iti:[tt lti,ifItillltflfi+(lIiii,IlI( . , . - : - - - - - P, Taylor EngineeringInc. ~ za C) Civil Desi~ and Land Planning 106 W. Mission Ave. Spokane, WA 99201-2345 POSZAGLP=8~~-3_.4 0 9 -S - 37~8--r#"i- u , 5 9 2 4WOs.~~~OC~2 ZIP COVE Y y~i" T_ ~ Sandra Raskell ' City of Spokane Valley '~ity of Spokane Valiey ~ 11707 E. Sprague Spokane Valley, WA 99206 , ~ ~~'1: ~ = - - i1~14t1~1~~►ti~~~i~~:;ii}<<I~tF1~4ii~t:6i~i{~3iti:;l.~i<<iTtl:! ~ w Taylor Engineering, Inc. * * L~B~~m= , Civil Design and Land Planning ► ~ ' 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2339 ~ 1930U.S.POS'FAGE 5430600,370 JUL OB 20o<,"~ `~J ~ t~ .~J Cr...~-✓ ~ i~:~ ~ :i'. ' - ~ Sandra Raskell ~ City of Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Spokane Valley, WA 99206 ~ city of S~o~a 33~,~~°~~ i ~u 1l1„1.i,..~1~111~„~1,►~11„1,11>»11l1.i.1.~1,.1„1~! ' . ; ' ` . H , . • , ~ _ - ' • , • t♦~ i, ~ ' . ~ . ' . _ ~ ~ . . •r' ` ~ e . + • , , p' , - 3 ` - ' , . ~ •~ati,~ . , r : , ~ , ` • • ♦ , ~ - t. . ~ , ' - ` , ~ ' ` . , . ' ' ` ~ ' f ~ • • ' ~ . . . ~ • ~ j 't • ,1 ~ • ~ . • , ' ` , ` • • , / ` 1 ~ l. ` . ' , • ' , ' ' . ~ ~ . , y , ~ • . , l, . ~ . ~ ~ ` " • ' i. . . ` 1; _ , , . . . . , , . m . State ' ~ ~ ~ ~r ' • , ) < , _ . . ~ , . - , . • , • ' e OTIM ~ . ~ k~~ ~ ' .r . • ' • 'L. , ~ . , . t. ai . . ~ ~ ~ . . _ 4. ~ P. , ~ . . 1.~ IC~AR . ~iM . . • s~ . • , ' • ' " . , - , . , ' . . ' p.R~ ~ r . ~ ' : - ~ ~ , - ~ " , _ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' _ . - ' ' • , ' , ' - ~ c~} . S • t• , ~ t • _r C. , ` - ~ ' . . _ ~ . . r ' `i ~ - ' i ~ . ~ ~ .f ~ • ~ ' t , t ~ y 4~ . ~ f ` ct • ~ f + a 1* `•i j , . i1 ~ , { ~ ' . ' 1 . + . r~ ` 1 J , : ~~,~..barJ~^ • '`t/.ti1' . `~r ' ~ ` ` ,l • 1- .s t. + F 1, 1 1 , 1 ! • r. ` t ' ~ Lr I . ~ . , . ~ • ' ' ~ , ~ :.i .,•R if ~ r .i t~,+ ` r' , %1 ' . t'}' ' , ' f ~ i ~ . ' • „ _ , ' ' ~ r ~ , ` - ~ f ~ ~ , ' . ' _ . 1 , " - • ' ~ \r. ,lr J - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ! : . i I ) ' , , ~ ' ' - ' . ' , r ~ j~ ry - . ~ , l~ ' . ~ ' ~ • _ i ~,i ' ' ~ ~ ~ t ~ , i , ~ ' x~ z,,` : , - ` t i' ' , ' , , • , ` , , ' ~ . , , i t ' '~i ~ • ` • ; ` t ' = ' , . ' * . . • : . _ F " ' i' - j ~ 4 ( - ' ~ ~t' .v , ` ~ ' , r ~ f), it. ~A ~1 J J r ~ <'~,J„ . ~S • ~}:r . , i i~•i e 1ij ' . 4 • , ~ J ' f . • ~ - ~ ~ l . ~ : ~ . . " , _ . . , ` , j - a^;~`'~~~~' ~ ' r ` ' ~ t ~ ~ , . ` • J • . , + . ~ ~ ' i t ~ ~ ) ' / , ' ` . . , ; f ~ r ~ ~ . ~ ` t ~ ~ • 1 A ~ ~ ~ . 1' ~ .j . ) ~A, r 4~ . ' ' tl~ • . . . t ~ ~ . ~ i , , . . , ~ ~ l~ ` ' =Y ~ ~ 't~' -y~ ; •i. .i ~ ~ • . • ~ ` , , ~ ~ • . , ~ , t~ ~ ~ ^ I~ , ~ ~ . ~ ~ a. . , . - _ ~ ~ . w ~ ti . + . ~ . \ _ ~ 1 t • ' ~ f' , 1~ y ~ a' . , i~ ' 1' . tt' , ~ ' . . ~ . r` ~ ' r ~ .r'~ • , f'ti l+'t ` ~ ! : i'~ ~ ~ ~ ,J ~:1 1~ k;, J~r~v . ~ , Jt , ~ . f~. 1`' ~ ' ~ . , , ~s t~ ~ 7 vt~' 1' ~ j 1~ ~r}''•r Y,`•-,~~~-t ~ • i r , '~/,1/ / ~ 1 'i , ~ ~ U.'1'ti~r• I ~?"F ! . ' ! ~ ~ .1 ~ ` ' ~ ~ 'a `i ~ L 1' n)~ ' L~ . ~~1~, ft` ~4.' .r ;t ( ( f,`( .1 1 ~ '1,' ~ r' ~ . . ~t 1 , ♦ ' t , • ' . . ~ j ~ ~ r, ~ " J ~ ~ ~ 4 tir=.,,~ ' " ~ ~z 4 ' ~ f ~ ~ j r• ` j ~ ~ ' ! ~ , ~ . ~ ) . . . } i` ~ }.i 1 'i~ . • jx ~ 4 . ~c . . ( ~ ~ ) . , ~ ~ . . f r "F. { , ' j 1 ~ ' t r.' -~11t~ ~ rl' , , , ~ ~ _ ( ~ ~ t j ~ ~ + ~ ~ v 1 'v ft ' , l ;v ' ' ' yt11 ' G' ~l ~ ' l 1 ~ . , . ~ ~ ~i y- ' ~ 4 . . t ' f i r • ~ ~ ~ / 1 • , ` j r ' ! ~ f r ' ! , r ' ~ ~f \ 1 ' ' ~ 1 t ~ ~ • ' ~ • t ' ' ~ ` ' • " , • - ' ' • ~ . • ' ' ~ • ~ , ~.V ~ • ~ i ' • ~ ' ~i , ~ l . . • . . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ " 1 S , ~ ` J , . . t; , ~ . •s, ~ t~` ~ 'T - ~ .Y ; ~ 1 ' y ~ ' . ` '~y• ~ ` ~ i. ' t ~e♦ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ • - ti ` ~ ,X . ~ J v •1 , r J~ y~ "A. , ~ ~ ~ i~ + , - . . , ~ : ~1 , , ~ • , i ` , `Y i lw• ~ r' ~I', i1~ ' l' ' • ` ' 1 . ~~1 i . , t ~ t' 7 , ' ',f-~ ~ , r t} . _ ~ t`~- , t 1, 1 . M1 '9 ~ 1 .i~ • . '1 ~ • - . • . 1` 1 ti, ~ . 1) ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' . ~ . ~ ~ , % ~ . ~ l ~ • . l 3 • ~ y y1} r ; ' ~ ` . .~,1:~ 1.4 . . E t . _~Y _ ~+i ~r • i i , - • • ' 6.. ' t ti,t~~ r ~ i~ ~f' J _~S ~ ' t . ` 'i ~ ~ ` ~ . t . . t ~ ~ . i , , ~ O~+ ' „'S ~ I ~ i' ~j 4 , t ~t~ , ,'''pf, ii , ~ '4, ~ ~ f~ • • ~ ' , I ` , ~ . ~ . ~ ' i ~ .S ~ . ~ ~ • ` ~ - , ' . , t ~ "t ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ Y t . . , ~ ~ r' 0 ' ~ j ~ ~ l } j ~-r ' ~ , • ~ . ~ ♦ ` ~ ri4 ~ 'i ~ i ~ ` ' [ ~ t •A` ~ ' JrF, ~~f~~• ~ t t j ~ . ~u ~ 1'~ . . ~ ' ' ' 1 ' ~ ~ ~ • ~ ,j i ti . ,g! ~ ; , ~ ^ -'t ~ " / tl;~ . ' , ' ~ S ✓ • ' 4 , ,iyt ~ J~"" , r: Y , ~ ' • ~ ~ • rr ,yv~• ~ . ` - ~ f . ~ , ~ ~~~y ; • ; ~a ` . 'c ~ , . ~ ; ~ `ead A9eA , y :.<,r , x 7 r• ~ .ti , . , , ~ 1 . •r ~ j~ , • ; , ~ ; • w ~ - , . ~ l _ . T ~ . , - ) ~ " ~ " ` ' ~ ~ r ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ! ~ 1 ~ f . • . y . J , ? I'.. • ~ ~ Y • r ' F t ~ ~ , ~ ' - ~ 1 • ~ t . ~ 'r' tt , ~ , , } ~ • . , • r • ' . 4 ` . ~ wT~j. ~Q v i + r .y 4 ,1+ . `j.{~ A~ . . ' w ~ ' . „V~1• , ~ ~ , ~ S ~ . ' ; r-~ , , %r ° S0,. lS.1~4 ~7 p ~ , A; f~~ ~ ' ~ ` . L ' • rt~ ~ ~ ~ ' , t ~ { r :i •j~3 ~Yy Y 'r, rc ~ ~ i . ~ • - n ~ ~ ' t . ` ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . '"•t~~ , t - . J r ~ ~Tnj .D11~~ ~ ~J w~~b~~.fl . , ~ . , ~ . Y ; , , r_ , - . , . , . , . ,,~I~N pF ~ , ~ 5~~, r~ t ~ 1. n ~ ' ~ °~'f • c t, % ~ . . , , . : . . ~3 -1 , ~ ~ - f • . ~ . ' r • D , t a' a , •b ~ a t~ i' . , , , , f~~ - ~ ~1~ _ 5f ~y ~ ~ • . / , t ~r~ f ~ ,~'t p0~P E: , ' , • w . , , ~ • • , . t ` i ` " ' / _ • t _ , . r ~ ' _ . . ~ ~ C', t y + t ' . , . ~i ared. ~ 1, ' . ~ 1 • . ~ • • - . . 3 . r • ' ~ , , . . c. ~ . ` ,.j 1 r , . ~ , t . _ - . ; , ; . . :t ~ ~ - ~ . t: ' ' . \ASS"' , . ' y. ~ 1 ~!i , ' , " i 4 r' • ~ ~ [ ~ ' ~ , ' ~ ~ . . ,t . , . ' , ' _ a~.., . • , . . ' . ~~N ~ . 1~ ~ ~L~►~- - ~ LeT►e~ •`as~ t ~ • 1 • - ~ ~ ~J ~ i _'t 1 , ~ y ;1 , 7 .,S~l~~~~ ~ . r. ~ '1 • ~ ~ ` _ . ~ ~ - •-r - . tf . ~ ~ s •.t' r - . ~ . ~ ' , , . , ~ J , _ 1 • • , ' - . ~ " • ~ ~ , ~ , , , . , F~ , . ; ' ~ . , . .1 • . ' ' . - ~ • ' . " ? . -s` ~ • . ~ a~ : ~ ~ , ~ : .~r- ~ • . ~ l , _ . . n . i , . 1 ~a J'L~' ~:'ti . ~ ` ~ y Vv . : ~ ~ , ' . . .ln . r ' . , 'l.- L =d' ` • , ~be~ 2tJI ~ Septe . i~ ~ ~ ~ ` `i ' _ Y l i , ~ • , . ' , ' _ ` 1. _ ` ~ , i ` ! - ~ - . , ~ . ~~1~ J4 ` = ' ~ ' ! r,,• ,Y, ' ~ . . , • ~ . . • ~ ~ .7 , . : t R' . ' • t , ' , " ~ . ti . ~ . r ~ ~ ' . . . . / ' ` • f _ ~ ~ . I t a --f* 9,~s' . ' J . ~ . : tj ij;7~ , j ' - ' Y•• va - • • ,~t:~'. ~ `l~ i . x' ~FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL . . . - f . IMPACT STATEMENT ~ - , . . Fr• TURTLE CREEK ~ LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH: - WASHlNGTON STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT OF 1971, CHAPTER 43.21 C REVISED CODE OF WASHINGTON - REVISED SEPA GUIDELINES, EFFECTIVE APRIL 4, 1984, CHAPTER 197-11, WASHINGTON ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ,Y- SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE, EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 1984 ~ - PREPARED BY: ~j RAMM ASSOCIATES, INC. SOUTH 25 ALTAMONT _ x SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 •~st_ es;' t { lt • SEPTEMBER 1996 'f • ,r, ~.er=~° , v ' ' .4 ~ l~~~'~i • . . ~ . t , ♦ . ~O . . • f3~ ~ ~ • TABLE OF CONTENTS Paoe No. 'D v~ Cover Letter from Lead Agency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Fact Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Distribution List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v . , . . Project Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 . Final EIS Comments and Responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 ~ . Appendices . ~ L Appendix A Final Scoping Notice . Appendix B Additional Transportation Information (Bound Separately) Appendix C Additional Public Sewer Information i , I P-4 - . C • c . 1 ' . J • 1 ' • < ' • SF - r' 4 ~ Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 94-033B ~a..` 4~~ t_ ' ' -r' l e~. . i: S P O K A N E s~„k , C O U N T Y : DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DNISION OF THE PUBI.IC WORKS DEPARTMEiv? : JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DFN;vts M. Sco7'r, P.E., DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM - r~ TO: Whom It May Concern L FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: September 20, 1996 RE: Turtle Creek Final Environmental Impact Statement Attached is the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Turtle Creek , Preliminary Plat, a proposed residential subdivision to divide approximately 39.0 acres into 1011ots for single family residences and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residentia13.5 zone. A total of 171etters commenting on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DELS) were received during the 30 day comment period specified by WAC 197-11-502 (5)(b). T"Lliese letters and responses are included i^ in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). This Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) is issued pursuant to WAC 197- 11460 and is being distributed to anyone who commented on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), and is available to those who received but did not comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). Copies of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) are available at the Spokane ~ County Division of Building and Planning, 15t Floor VVest, Public Works Building, ~ 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. {N If you have any questions regarding the Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat proposal or the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), please contact John Pederson at ; .a (509) 456-2205. . ~ 11'.pk , ,Y. - 1026 WEST BROADwAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 ButLDrvC; PxoNE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703 , PLatvtvING PHONF: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243 Ti7T): f;n91 '194-31 Fi6 ~ '1'~ n b ' p . 't•• ^ .+a . . . J F . " . _ . 1• _ • '~t FA C T SHEET , .D . . Title: Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat Brief Description: A preliminary plat totaling 101 new residences is proposed on 39.0 acres in the Spokane Valley, at the southwest corner of Barker Road and 8th Avenue. The site is in the Urban land use category of the County's Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is ~ acurrently zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). The overall gross density proposed . is 2.6 units per acre. The proposal also includes 6.7 acres of open space and areas ~ along Saltese Creek that will be preserved and enhanced to protect the wetland area associated with the creek. This area will be maintained by the Turtle Creek Homeowner's Association. The internal road system proposed is a combination of public and private paved roads, ' with primary access provided by public roads at two points along 8th Avenue. Future access.to the south is also provided. A stormwater management plan will be prepared to address retention of stormwater via swales, drywells, and retention ponds. Washington Water Power will provide the project with electricity and natural gas. Spokane County sewer lines will be extended into the site by the applicant. Water will ` be supPlied b Consolidated Irri ation District. Detailed en neerin Y 9 gi g plans will be required for construction which must meet local and state standards. Approval and _ implementation of the proposed action will permanently alter the site through the development of roads and homes. The proposed project was originally submitted to the County on June 21, 1994 and received approval by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee on September 22, 1994. An appeal of that decision and further public hearings before the Board of County Commissioners resulted in their request for preparation of an environmental `impact statement (EIS). In accordance with the SEPA Rules WAC 197-11-600(4)(b) and WAC 197-11-635, all or part of the Draft and Final EIS for the Morningside ' Heights Preliminary PUD Plat is incorporated by reference into this Final EIS for the ~ -4 Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat. The Draft EIS for the Morningside Heights Preliminary . PUD Plat was issued October 19, 1995 and the Final EIS was issued on April 11, ; 1996. Both documents are available for review at the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning. The Draft and Final EIS for Morningside Heights PUD provide environmental analysis of a separate residential development proposed by the same proponent in the same general area as the Turtle Creek project. The Morningside Heights PUD Preliminary Plat was approved by the County Hearing Examiner on , August 15, 1996. ' -Alternatives Include: Proposed Action Lower Density Alternative No-Action Alternative Tuit/e Creek Fina/ E/S ii September 1996 94-0338 ~ t'4• :•7 s~:~~ s+ . ^14nb ' .s ?'.+~~.,,lt~'• ' . . `l i-, C~ ~i'f t • • Proponent: Dahm Development, Inc. c/o Rich Dahm Tentative Implementation Date: Late 1996 to eariy 1997 ~ Lead Agency: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 509/456-2205 . Responsible Offiicial: James L. Manson, Director Contact Person: John Pederson, Senior Planner . ~ Required Permits and Licenses: . • Preliminary and final plat approval and compliance with RCW 58.17/Spokane County Division of Building and Planning • Approach permit and drainage approval/Spokane County Division of Engineering • Sewer and water utility system approval/Spokane County Division of Utilities • Building permits/Spokane County Division of Building Authors and Major Contributors to the Draft EIS: Draft EIS Document: _ Ramm Associates, Inc. Supporting Studies and lnformation: Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Robert R. Quinn, Ph.D. and Michael M. Folsom, Ph.D., Geographical Services DEIS Date of Issuance: February 1, 1996 FEIS Date of Issuance: September 20, 1996 e . Time and Place of Public Hearings or Meetings: To be established Type and Timing of Subsequent Environmental Review Committed to by Lead Agency or Other Agencies: None anticipated Location of Prior EIS or Information on this Proposal: . . Spokane County Divisi andOf Building and Planning Ramm Associates, Inc. - L„ South 25 Altamont Spokane, Washington 99202 509/534-8086 Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S iii September 1996 ~ 94-033B . .,d`4:s+'`t~;~ ~.•i:~' ~ . '~~~i ~ ^ • Copies of the DEIS and FEIS may be obtained from the Spokane County Division of . Building and Planning. The DEIS and FEIS are also availabie for review at the Spokane . Public Library. Cost to the Public Per DEIS: Cost of reproduction $:Cost to the Public Per FEIS: Cost of reproduction . .rv,. . h, e F• p:• cS 1Y. - Turile Creek Final E/S iv September 1996 94-033B . i • L , o! . . _r • 1 D/STR/BUT/ON L/ST Note: All agencies and individuals who commented on the Draft EIS will receive copies of ihe Final EIS. A Notice of Final EIS Availability will be provided to agencies and individuals indicated 'with an asterisk. WA State Department of Ecology, Environmental Review Section (2 copies) P.O. Box 47703, Olympia, WA 98504-7703 . WA State Department of Ecology, Rebecca J. Inman P.O. Box 47600, Olympia, WA 98504-7600 WA State Department of Ecology, Dennis Beich 4601 North Monroe Street, Suite 100, Spokane, WA 99205-1295 * WA State Department of Health, Tom Wells 1500 West 4th Avenue, Suite 305, Spokane, WA 99204 * WA State Department of Health, Water Supply and Waste Section Mail Stop LD-11, Olympia, WA 98504 WA State Department of Natural Resources Forest Resources. Division, Natural HQritage Program 1111 Washington St. SE, P.O. Box 47016, Olympia, WA 98504-7016 WA State Department of Fish and Wildlife, Carmen Andonaegui 8702 North Division Street, Spokane, WA 99218 WA State Department of Wildlife, Nongame Program ° North 600 Capitol Way, Olympia, WA 98504 , I . WA State Department of Natura) Resources, SEPA Center ~ PO Box 47015, Olympia, WA 98504-7015 . * WA State Archaeology and Historical Preservation, Robert Whitlam ' 111 West 21 st Avenue, Olympia, WA 98504 ' < ~ WA State Patrol, Captain Jim LaMunyon 6403 West Rowand Road, Spokane, WA 99204 WA State Department of Transportation, Leonard Cash - 2714 North Mayfair Street, Spokane, WA 99207-2090 Y1~• ~ Turtle Creek Final ElS v September 1996 94-033B • f ~ : . . - • ' US Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service, , Steve Campbell - Rock Pointe Tower II, 316 West Boone Avenue, - Suite 451, Spokane, WA 99201-2349 * US Fish and Wildlife Service 3704 Griffin Lane SE, Suite 102, Olympia, WA 98504 US Department of Housing and Urban Development - Farm Credit Bank Building, 8th Floor East, 601 West 1 st Avenue, . Spokane, WA 99204-0317 * Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, S. Edward Hayes 1101 West College Avenue, Suite 403, Spokane, WA 99201 ~ : * Spokane County Conservation District, R. E. Baden 222 North Havana Street, Spokane, WA 99202-4724 Spokane County Health District, Steve Holderby 1 101 West College Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201 Spokane County Sheriff's Department, John Goldman 1100 West Mallon Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201 * Spokane County Division of Buildings, Tom Davis 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Legat 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260-0180 Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, Pat Harper 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 . Spokane County Division of Engineering, Ed Parry . : 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 ~ Spokane County Division of Engineering, Tammie Williams _ 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane County Division of Engineering, Stan Miller Water Quality Management Program _ 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane County Parks, Recreation, and Fair, Wyn Birkenthal . 404 North Havana Street, Spokane, WA 99202 - * Spokane County Prosecutor's Office, Chief Civil Deputy 1100 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99260 Turt/e Creek Fina/ f/S vi September 1996 94-033B , tih.':j)o•;r • • 'Y ~,Zo . :•t,r y . • " ' rr. . . Spokane County Public Library - Main Branch 12004 East Main Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane County Fire District No. 1, Eric Olson 10319 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201 -Spokane City Public Library, Main Branch 906 West Main Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201 , * City of Spokane Construction Services Department 808 West Spokane Falls Blvd., Spokane, WA 99201-3333 * City of Spokane Planning Department ~ 808 West Spokane Falls Blvd., Room 250, Spokane, WA 99201-3333 * Historic Preservation Officer, Property Development Services 808 West Spokane Falls Boulevard, 3rd Floor, Spokane, WA 99201-3333 Spokane Regional Transportation Council, Glenn Miles 808 West Spokane Falls Boulevard, 4th Floor, Spokane, WA 99201-3333 . * Boundary Review Board, Susan Winchell 721 North Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260 Central Valley School District No. 356, Dave Jackman - 19307 East Cataldo Avenue, Spokane, WA 99016 * Spokane Transit Authority 1230 West Boone Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201 ~ Valley Garbage Service ~ 11700 East 1 st Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 . Consolidated Irrigation District, Bob Ashcraft ~ 120 North Greenacres Road, Greenacres, WA 99016 ' Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc., Mike Yake 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 ~ Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc., Todd Whipple 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 ~ Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc., Ann Winkler 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 . Eugster Haskell, Stephen K. Eugster . 423 West 1 st Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204-0206 . Tuft/e Creek Final ElS vii Septembei 1996 94-033B .•~i'r• )µ~~b . • 1 • • * Saltese Landowners Association, Ramona Triber 4123 South Chapman Road, Greenacres, WA 99016 * Brenda Benn 18127 East 8th Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 ~ Mike and Pam Bendix .17907 East 8th Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 Harvey L. and Rosemarie B. Brown 1505 South Barker Road, Greenacres, WA 99016 L Patrick and Theresa Brown iJ 18223 East 8th Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 ~ Lyle and Marilyn Burnett 17705 East 32nd Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 William and Mary Cabbage 17615 East 32nd Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 ~ Kathleen M. and Delbert R. Carstens 801 South Henry Road, Greenacres, WA 99016 * Jerry and DeeDe Ennis ~ 17411 East 32nd Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 * Harold O. Hayes 23421 Broken Lance Lane, Liberty Lake, WA 99019 * Kent Hickman 4810 South Long Lane, Greenacres, WA 99016 . a William and Odell Lebrow 17325 East 32nd Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 * Paul and Jean May 17515 East 32nd Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 ~ Larry and Alberta Morley 17913 East 32nd Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 * Robert A. Nichols 18721 East 4th Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 Turt/e Creek Final ElS , viii September 1996 94-033B f . . , . rs r • A ' j~ ' , t . , ' ' ' ~r. . . . • -i Linda Tasca 18005 East 8th Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 , Aprii Taylor . 19921 East 6th Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 - * Doris Wagar ~ - j 2626 South 8arker Road, Greenacres, WA 99016 * Don and Linda Wallman . 4418 South Chapman Road, Greenacres, WA 99016 ~ Terry L. and Janet L. Weskamp 19603 East 8th Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 * Erin and Toni Wilson 18025 East 32nd Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 ~ ! 1 i ~ r Turtle Cieek Final E/S ix September 1996 94-033B Mnt. r,~~' ,l' ~ ~,,~~~1~~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ ~ ' V~ u • l . ~ ' 1 . ~ " .i ~ ~1~"~1 , ' ~ ~ ~ . 1 I ,l ' • , ~ . , ~r` `i i ~:`4 ' •1~1 . ^r1,~' o;'' ' ~ , , ~;`~1~r, l~fr~ _ ~ ~I` ' "~1 ` ` `I ~,i ~I ' . •Je 1 ^ I j l\.: ~ . ~ 1 !;r ' • ~ ~ '~~V..'n~' ~ tt . r . ,L'. ~ ~ 1 a ` ~ ~ ~ti , ~ ~ t' ~1 ~ , ~ f~ ~ ~ t . ~ 1 \ c-.~ Y : ' , l - ~/t~~ ` • ~ t i ` 1' vf ~ ry1 ~ ( j ~ 'I ~ ' ~ l f .Y ;0 1' . ~ , ~ : ~ l. ~ _ ,r l~, ` ~ J ",~'~,`~',,,,:.'r,~~~~ ~ ~y -~1~~1 ~ i ' , ' - „ ~ 1 ' 'f j~ , , 1~ ~ ~ ~Z~~.`~i, . ! r pi• , ~ 4~ ~ , ~ , . f,_, , ' . 1 i , i , • ' , ~ l.!~ i~ i 4. ~ : rc • , ~ l ~ ~ ' ' ` ' ~ f ~ - t~ y'; ' r,~_1~,'~'>' R''\ ^ ti - H. ~ ~ .1..s .~~~1,1, i„ 1 'r. ~ ~ J f, f ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~J ' ~ ~f~ ' ~ J ~ 1~\ L i ~ ~J r `(1~ ~ / ~~1.' ~ I ! ~1r~, r f f ~ I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , •a~ t n ~ ' j j', ~ ' ~ \ 1 . ~ • • ~1'i" • !/St'~[ ~ 1 r~,^'~' .W, ~ .r, r. .l l • , ~ . ' ~ 7 ~ ~ - .t ~ ' • ~ r . -i / ' f • ~c r' , J ~ s ~ t 1 ~i ~ j ~ ~ ' l' ,i` ~ '`L ~ ~ _ . ~ , r. , , ~ • i, ~ , ' ✓ ' . , d • . ~i .i I. 1~~ , . , , _ ~ . r .L. 1~ ~ 7 ~r ~ . ; A~N~ t' , f ~ , t . . ~ H, ~ li' ~ i.,_j ' ~l , ~ ' /li ~ , 1, ' ~ . ' ,,I ,d ~ ~4~ ^J' ~ ~ ~ ^ ~i~ i . i{ -±I q . 1~ ~ ~ ,.~`~ti l~` - ' V ` ~ ~Yi ~ • ~„w ,-I . ~ ~ ~1 , qi') , i~~ i'+}, i' f i ' ~ •I~ , ~ . r~ ' I ~ a: ~ ~ 1/ ~ ~ i ~ . . 'i` I, ! ` - I l, ' '•.f , 1 , . ~ 1 ~ ~ y iro• ' 41 ~~,r ,.4 f • •t' J • l ~l . f r ~ ~d•• -1 s l i ~~`.i lI f ~ ~ /,J1r~~ ~'i ~ ~ i'..i, ;1+1., l\`'~~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ •~fi . Y' ~ J.f~ 7 ~ ~ ' \ ~ y JI. ~ ' ~ . ' ~i~l ~ t~{ ~ . ~ .i , . ~ J~; ~ :`t,'~' ~ i -1~ ~ ~ ' "~~`~~r ~~~;~7'.1 y ~ ;?`ll ' ~',e ' . . I . , . • , . E. . . ~ • , . , ~ _ . P 1 \ ~ ) r ~ , ' I 1 ' , 'l - r 1 v { ` ~ ~ / + ! , , , ~ r ^ ` y } ~.~T 9 1 1' .I~ ~ ~ , 1 ' ~ , ' i• . 4i ,.ti ~ i . 'I n ~ ~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~t % I ~ ~ i - ' '(l • ' ~ . , ~ , • it`\ ` ` ~ •t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i. ~r ~ ~ 'i ' , r' ~ l ` . \ ` ' ~ ~ V' , t, ' , ~I ~F , f / ~ ~i 1',,. j;^ -,f~' , ~ y' t ~;1'~ ~ 1~. ' • ' ~ . ~I . ~ , . i • ~ ~ _ d~ i , ~~''r d • F.. r'~~ : ' ' , • . , , % , . ~ 1' ~ J ~I ~ ' ~ ~ , ~ ( ~ ' `"i L l P . ' ~ i - f 4• t ~ _ 1 ~ r' ~ ~ ~ !1" ~ ~ ^ , i , , . , - . 1. ,l ' . , .~~r_'~, ~ t ~ ) . ` 1 \ ,J . l C~i~r ✓ ` \J ' , ~ ~~7 I ~ ~ p,~ I ~ • f ' l ~ ~ r _ f . ~ . • ' ~ r f~• } ~ • ~ 1 ~ , f , 'r . ' - i" ' •i~ p ~ . ~ ~yl ~~,Z ~f , ~ t`'' ~~',~•i~~''R4i { ~~I~, r'~ `P~- 1~ ~ t •'S , ~1 ~ ~ , J f i ! . . ~ ! J , ' . ~ , ~ ~i„ j i') / ~ ( ` L~ . ` '~I i 11 ~ 1 ~ / , ~ , ' . ~ ' , ry~ . ✓ , i ~r~. a L`, i'~y ~ , ~ I' 'i(~~ . ~ , . ~ 1 . ` - i • . •r- ~,p IC'i v ,i ~'i~~ ~ ~''1 : ' , ~ 1~ 1 ti~_ ;-`..Y ~~.t~,♦ 7 , i~\, s t 'J,IV ' , ' ~ , ~ ~1),~~,~~ U~,,;,' ~~f + ,~~~/~~r~1+!`~ ; ` , • } j + .t~<r,.~,~- ^~~,,a ~ ~ 'r, . 4 „ , ~ ~ ~ ~ _Y r•~ ' i~ ~ ~l i . ~ ,t yy, ~ ~ ^ ~ `,IP%•~~ , j• ~,~1, I J,,.~ ~~1~'.~ . 1~ . ~ ; - ~ f ~J , f '~1i' ! ~ t,~'~ r~ ' ~S~ ~V : ~i L ' \ ~ , ' • ' . r ' / F ' • ' ! , 'r , S:Y ~ i ~ l: 'A ' , • • ~ , , + ~ . ~Y,-r,' i f ~ •l~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ • ! 1 ~ i i • l~;,'' S i i ~ 1, 1 t ' ' ~ ~5-, . ~ , • ii , '+.o'', : -td, ~ ' 'A~ ' 'i ~ . .1.,. ~ ' , ~ 1~~t l 4 ~ ` 1 , .it ~ ' ~ ~ 'J / \ ' ~ ' ~ j~'~'' • ^ ' r; v ~ t~~ .v1i ~ _ ' 'ti~.; i~ , ~ , t~ _ t~~'- ~J ' \ . ' mr~~" 3,` 0 ' - 1'l , _ r 1 ,r' ! . ~~1 p ,'i{ ~ ~ ~ ' i ~ , i . ' ~ . ~ ~ , . , 't ~ ,W., ~,l, •r l ~ ~ ~F•' ~.~('"~~~y ~ ~Y ~'v • G~~1~ ~',r ' ) ' {-.1~ ~ ~i .r+ ~ r . * , ' ' ' , y ' j •'I ; ~J " ! ~ , ' ~ , . ~A,.r, i V ,3 I \ t ; t ~ - ; ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '11~, , . r1 ' \ ~ . , ' ~1, ~ ~ 'i` T ' n , , ~ ) _ T- ~.L ~ t ' ~ ~,f~ r' ~l. ; ~ t \ 1 ~ . i ~ , ~ . ~ ! r ~ ' "1 \ ti ,f ~ ~i~ , • , ~ ~ ~r. t ,••f , ..f J i ; ` f ' i ~ : i I 1' ' '°t. ! , ` } , . ✓ , ~ y . .t ~ , =~t! , , ~ti' ~ ~ /'t 1 16., r, ~ r` 7 , ~f. „ ~ ~ J r. S , , ' ` , ; 4 ; ~ ~ 1 I r: ~ , `~"~r~ ; ~i.,/ i~J 71 ~ i, J~1 ~r~ ;*~~J l~ ;f ' i" i ' . . % . , i , ~ ` j : ~ , r r ~ i / y n . : ~ ~ ~ , , ` , yc ~A I ~ J i'i , ^ ' • 1 ~ !i . . ~ i Y ~ ~ . a ~ ~ . ~ i ' , , . / ~ ~ 1 ~r ~ ° ' ' , i . ~ i . ' ~ ~ . . ! ' , , .'.t, ~ " ' I ~ v~ 1~ ' Y.~ ~ J ~.0. 'L~ ' ~ 5'"~~ r~ ~ ti+•~ ` ~ i l ' ' t t+ IY 'ti~.. . ~ ~ ~,i•` , - j/ ~i f~ ,t. J ~~,I~ , . , a ~ . i ~ `l ~ ` L ~~I ' ' i1- . j. ~ ' t ; , ' . - 4 ` ~ . , - , , • ` ; . ti " , r ''';~t t . . . - 't ~ I I I 1 . I ~l ~ ' ~ , ~ + ~V ~ ~ ' . , / • ~ ~ ~ \f r • lN~~ ' l ~ G. , ~i.~ „ ~ ~ ' ~ I ' ' rfi .I r , ~ 1 ~ _ • , . , ,J ' i ~ ~ - h~ . 4 Y % ~ 1\ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ , . , r,~ . . , i ~ ' . /^l., f i 1_ ~ , ' y{"31 , , l ~J / , ~ / ~ ! ` ~.~t ~t a./`' . . • ~ . ~ ~ , :i v~ 1`L'~4 "l. t ..`I-~;~~/`.•~'~~ .r~ : ,i~ . ~ ' i , I' C Y"' ~ 1 1 ~ ~ l , ' J. ~ ~ i~ ~ ~.t f ' 1' II/,' ' ~ ! r . I~ ~ ~ rl, i'7 ' r , ' . , ~J . , f \ , . , ~ya ^'S~ j .J ~ ~'Jti IS_r+i ~y ~ : , •S'~. i r ~ . - . , , , , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ..T~ ~ ' • ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~C, i t {'1 ! i ~ r` ) . ~ti_ ~ , r~. t r 9r '1. ~ ~~,n r~, N~ ~ {..r ir iC} ~1 ! ,~s' ~ . , ~ . ~ . ~ I , ' ~ ''r~ ~ ~ , ~ . , 1 w ~ . ' ~ ~ . . , f~ . \ , ~ •1 ~ / j ~ . ♦ ~ , ~ ; ~ . ~ ' ~ + ~ y ~ i! r ! ~ ~ I r ~ ' ~ ~ p ~ • i\ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ + a ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ y . • ~ 3' ~ ` ' ' ? . , ' ~ f ~ ~ . r ~ ~l ~ ` v. ~.`;~'1 . ~r ~ ~i~ ~~Y." ;y • t~ ~ <<~ ~ 'yi~ ~,7_} ~ ~ , . - , ' ' ~ ~ t • . . ` . : , . , i/ + ~1~f ~ • . ~ i , 1'r` ''j l~ . 1~'/~r~,:`i . \ I~ t'~ ~ t' i t~' ~""y ,yT ~ I ~ q; r•~ ' `f~ } ~,-I~ ~+i~ . . ' ':i ' • ` r:r ~ ~~e' f'~ ~l 1 J ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ~~~ll ~ f~~~ ~~i~ . ) ' t J~ " , ~ ~h r ` T / L ~ ' ~ , \ 0 ~ • l 1 S ~`1~ ~ ~ ~1 ` i``~~'~' . . • \ / _ 1 ~ ! •~v ~ ' ~ A / /1 ~ 1 ~I r,~ , t ~ ~t ~ . ~J ~ ,1 . • f ~ ( . t l • ~ ~ ^ `1~~~ f~f J l' ~ ` ` ~ '^1 ~ I ~ • • ` 1 f _ „ i , 1 ~ti ~ ' `!Y ~ , r';\' r 1~- ~ ~j ~ t"' ~ si ~ I ' _i;' 1~ 'I ~ I ~ ~ ~'t • .1` . ' . ~ 'f;.: ~ ~ . . \ ; A I 4 ,1 , • ~ ; f ~ „ ~ ' 'I! y . ~ ' g' , ~:,t , ~ ~ , ~ `^'1,~, ~ ~ ~ i, . ~ • ` ~ - ~ - ~ , ~ ' 1, „ '~,'~y~ I ~f I: , . l~~i' i ~r~l~~J~ r....~~ . , ,r C/_ ~ ~.~'S` ~ i:.. , t .~~F~ , T. .r. ' • i ( ~ `y . , i, ~1 y~' ~i ~ 1 ~ ~~.:r{ , ..1.1 f ,r ~ , fi ' .\,i tr ~ 7 ~ \l't ~~✓~5,~~~I ~ ~~/f1 ~ ~ 1.. ~ . . _ , •r ~ ~ , ~ ~ : . , ~ . , ~ ~ • ~ . i _1~ .i /,i • , 1. , 1 . . ~1 . , I ~ ,C ,v i,~.' r ~j ~ , ~~r5 „ ♦ i . S•r. ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ ' i • ~ - ~ ~ ~ ; , l, { : V. • , r ~ ~ t fi ,i, I f o i r~ r • ' t'r ~ ` / J~1. _ ~ „ . ~ . 7, , 7 ~ % ; , . ~ ~ ~'i ~ , , ~ y~ p ' r r 1~~~/ ~ ~~l ~ r/ ' ~I5 ~ ~ J~ .\.1ri .~i~ „11 ~ t D~ ~ 'r4~ 1~~,/~~ S~ ~~L Y~+ ~I~ i~~ ~.1 ~ ' , ~ ~ ' ~ , r i , I . . s ' ti ~ 1 ~ - o - , 1-••i , P. \t ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~t{ , , " ~ , i ~~~f . , i V`-~~ ~ P / , ~ ~ • ) ~ ~ ,°'u_ ~ '~~i,` S~ ~ y~~l~ i` ' ~ • ~ ! o , . ~ ; ~ ' '1 _ ~y ~ • ~ ~r , , , ; ` . ' , I.'yr' y~ ~ ~ r- ,7 i, l,}'i ~ .'i` . , a~~ ~ ~ s ~/,J• , ~ ~ r ~ t~ y~ ` ~lh, ~ f~'i + ' t ~ ' ~t' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ) • i w . . - ,'t Y rr ~ ,(I' • , ' , ~ ~ ~ , , "d1~7 , ~r ' , \ ` 'I~ . ~ y. : .I,'d' " J J t r, r,. r ` , ~!'tt / I ~i ' , ~ , . ~ . `'1,' f n' 1- ~ ~ . , ° ~ ~ 1 . tt _ I.,~ ~ ~`Y • ~ S~, ~ ~ r ,l . . \ • ".i~ rr~~, I ~~1~ %~.`y../ ye: ~ ~ • , _ L t ;i'l '~%i l~. 1 i.~ ; ~ ~iR r~ i.~ ,_6 l~ ' ~ ~ ;r,~ ~r~ , i~~ ~ '1 j/ ~ ~ 1 a ~ ` ~ l ~ ~ ~ r n... ~ i 4.~' 1p'~~ r , ~ it ) ~ .f , }r' i! i, ~,~,~L~y,~ r ' .'i ~ v~^ ~ `-~•1 ,,I. ''.1~~4~ •Y'\\ 11~'~J J~~,,.',,I:~ ` t ~~~4.~~ ~ , ~ ~ , ..J, ="i1' ; ~...1.' a+ i •i~ : /i~ • { r ~ " Jl,'y' ~ ~ .ti• s 1 ~ 1~ ~ 'i,R~.1 ~b" ~ ~ 1 , f' '1'~'~` . , i ~1 1: ~.;I ' ' ' f • , 1 ~ f , ~~'~.,'rT ~iJ~I'.~ ~'1(4,; " 1=-~ , '^~~5;~'/'1 ' l~rf ~ . ~ ~1.I~a ~7 Y'' ' 1'{`'~ , ,~t , ry ; i.~~./1~:e,\~~ J~ •~~ir.e ~ `~;.a~ ~ t '3 ~ r,,.~ i ti.v.i~ 7 , ,t .ti • ~,a y / . ~ y .S•. T~' 1~r ~ ~ ~ t~,~l ; { " + ~ ~ . ~ ~ , , y • ~ . , . • .1 "y~~b°, ~r.~t.~,. ~ ~A tJ 'f'~'.~::~~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~r ~~li ~~~'r ~ ~ ~j P . ~ ~ :i ,-b.~ • i ~,i,::~i•,,.a.!' .k:f~~ . ! ' ~ ~,cc "1' , . . ~7 y~ l t r . . 'a~ ~ ~ .~i~~ z ' i"'`'-i„ cf; 't y-,c' . • ~ ~+~t~•''~' ' ;iC~ PROJECT SUMMARY ~ OBJECT/VES The proponent proposes to develop 101 single-family dwelling units on a 39.0 acre project site. Approximately 6.7 acres of open space are provided mostly along the site's southwest boundary lying adjacent to Saltese Creek. Proposed uses of open space areas include a designated conservation easement to protect and enhance wetland buffers, passive recreational uses, and stormwater management facilities. The proposal's objectives are summarized as follows: - . • Develop a residential communitythat is compatible with surrounding platted neighborhoods and complies with the existing County Zoning Code and Comprehensive Land Use Plan. • • Provide open space areas to protect the water quality of adjacent Sattese Creek. • Minimize off-site impacts caused by project development and increased population on-site. . - • Provide additional housing opportunities within the general area to meet a growing market demand. • Provide paved roads, pathways, and through connections as required and minimize off-site road impacts. . • Provide an aesthetically pleasing environment in an effort to enhance adjacent land uses. ~ Provide restrictive covenants and controls that will assure quality control of ; architectural considerations, outline landscaping and maintenance practices, place restrictions on domestic pets, and protect the environment. 5 . `.1 . • :s . PROPOSED ACT/ON The proposed site is 39.0 acres of undeveloped land located in the Spokane Valley, at the southwest corner of the Barker Road/8th Avenue intersection (see Figures 1 and 2). A preliminary plat of 101 single-family residential dwelling units is proposed (see ; . Figure 3). The project site is in the Urban Category of the County's Comprehensive Plan and is currently zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). The minimum lot size for ' the UR-3.5 zone is 10,000 square feet with an overall maximum density of three and . Turt/e Creek Final ElS 1 September 1996 94-033B ' l °n.',fitl • e`~•~~~~`+• _ • • .:v; . rs•aa: . . one-half dwelling units per acre. The overall gross density proposed is 2.6 units per acre, with a net density of 3.0 units per acre including open space areas. Approximately 16 fewer lots are proposed than could be allowed under the existing UR-3.5 zoning. Clustering of smaller lots with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay zone is not part of the proposed action and bonus density is not requested. Rezone of the site is not sought or required to support the proposed density. Open space areas will be jointly developed for stormwater drainage control and . passive recreational purposes. Approximately 6.7 acres of open space are provided mostly along Saltese Creek to protect and enhance the wetland areas associated with the creek. The road system will consist of a combination of paved public and private roads. Access to the developed site would be provided by 8th Avenue to the east and E= west. Site design allows for future access to the south as required by County agencies. Sewer service will be provided by developer extension of Spokane County sewer lines from the approved 8-inch line in 8th Avenue that will extend east from Long Road to ~ serve Meadowview Ranch Estates. Water will be supplied by Consolidated Irrigation ( District. Washington Water Power will supply natural gas and electricity to the site. A master stormwater management plan will be prepared to address retention of stormwater via swales, drywells, and detention- ponds. The common open space areas and private roads will be owned and maintained by the Turtle Creek Homeowner's Association. Covenants and restrictions will be prepared as part of the - development and will address such issues as house design and color, lot landscaping, open space use, maintenance of private roads and open spaces, and domestic pets. ALTERNATIVES - Two alternatives to the proposed action to develop the project site are also given . consideration. They include: 1) Lower Density, and 2) a No-Action alternative. The following is a general discussion of impacts regarding these two alternatives. . 1.0 Lower Density Alternative ~ ` At approximately one acre per lot, this alternative would allow the development of 29 ' buildable parcels on the site, approximately one-third of the 101 units proposed (see Figure 4). This alternative could be considered more compatible with existing land uses and parcel sizes adjacent to the north (i.e. Pheasant Park), however it is not consistent with the approved Meadowview Ranch Estates plat to the east or with -existing zoning of the site and surrounding area. - The lower density alternative would result in lower quantities of impervious surfaces, less stormwater run-off, and fewer vehicle trips. All roadways would be developed to public roadway standards. The restricted number of lots developed would not make sewering cost-effective. Individual on-site septic systems on each lot could increase Turtle Creek Final ElS 2 September 1996 94-033B . • :.1~,.~: . er 7111~L': potential impacts on the surface water quality of Saltese Creek and the underlying . aquifer. There would be less demand for public services in this area including schools, police, . and fire fighting services due to the lower population levels, and less tax money generated to support the needed services. This alternative may or may not include the formation of a homeowner's association or restrictive covenants. This could . aesthetically impact the area by not governing paint and fence colors, architectural design, and landscaping practices. If no provisions or restrictive covenants are included which govern use of open space areas, the wetland -areas along Saltese Creek could be afforded less protection than what is currently proposed. ~ Large animal-keeping would not be allowed because it is not permitted within the • existing UR-3.5 zone. 2.0 No-Action Alternative This alternative would preclude development of the project site. Existing conditions would essentially remain on-going, including current agricultural production. No areas containing prime farmland soils would be removed from agricultural production. No additional property tax revenue would be generated by the proposed project. There would not be any impact on public services. Additional school capacity, busing, and fire and police protection services would riot be required. Roadway and utility extensions throughout the site would not occur, however approved sewer extensions in Long Road and 8th Avenue would still be completed to serve the Meadowview Ranch Estates and Morningside PUD residential subdivisions. There would be no increase in off-site traffic or impervious surfaces. Stormwater run-off generation would remain unchanged. " lVA TURAL ENV/RONMENT I ~ 1.0 Earth • . ~'Y . .:y The majority of the site (approximately 80%) consists of Garrison gravelly loam (GgA) and Garrison very gravelly loam (GmB) soils. The southeast corner of the site along yf Saltese Creek contains Peone silt loam (PoA). Marble Ioamy sand (MaC) soils are found along Saltese Creek. Most of the on-site soils are considered consistent with . the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) criteria for prime farmlands. GgA and GmB soils are considered prime farmland only if they are irrigated and PoA soils only if they are drained. - Generally much of the site is made up of soils (GgA and PoA) that have severe limitations that reduce the choice of plants, or require special conservation practices, or both (class III), according to NRCS criteria. Crop yields of winter and spring wheat . Turt/e Creek Final E/S 3 September 1996 94-033B " ' p, .,L .r.~ • y, - `rYi :r f4~; - : - ' - , are expected to average 20-30 bushels per acre. Portions of the site contain soils (GmB and MaC) with severe limitations that restrict plant choice, require very careful management, or are generally unsuitable for cultivation (classes IV and VII). Estimated yields are not provided by the NRCS for these soils. According to the Consolidated Farrn Service Agency, records of crop yields have not been reported for the project site. The existing agricultural land use character of the site would be altered due to the introduction of single-family residences and public services. The on-site prime farmland soils including 25 acres of cultivated farmland would be removed from ~ production. The impact on adjacent farming activities would not preclude agricultural use or productivity of adjacent lands. 2.0 Air The project site is located within the non-attainment areas for both carbon monoxide (CO) and suspended particulates (PM10). The CO level at the intersection of Pines Road and Mission Avenue, located approximately five and one-half miles northwest of the site, was modelled by the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC). The air quality analysis revealed that present CO levels are 8.68 ppm, with future CO levels of 8.96 ppm. Both of these levels are within acceptable threshold limits. Sources of particulate matter in the vicinity of the project site include agricultural activities (plowing) and unpaved roads (8th Avenue). - According to the results of the Barker Road Traffic Impact Analysis and Corridor Study, acceptabie air quality woufd be demonstrated at all intersections within the study area. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) did not respond to a request for scoping of an air quality study, and previously indicated that projected traffic volumes from development of Turtle Creek are too small to require an air quality analysis. Therefore no significant long term air quality impacts are identified either on or off-site. Short-term quality impacts could occur during the construction phase due to grading and excavation and use of heavy equipment and trucks. Agricultural activities would be eliminated resulting in a reduction of agricultural related emissions. ~ Short-term air quality impacts will be mitigated using appropriate control measures including spraying of exposed soils to suppress dust and washing the wheels of trucks and equipment. The project will most likely be conditioned to pave 8th Avenue, which would remove it as a source of suspended particulates. 3.0 Water Saltese Creek lies adjacent to the site's southwestern property boundary and consists of a channel that averages approximately 20 feet wide and 12 feet in depth. Water , in this intermittent drainage channel is utilized for upstream agricultural practices and is controlled by irrigation gates. Drainage from Saltese Creek terminates in Shelley Lake, located approximately one mile west of the site. The Draft EIS for the Shelley 3 Turtle Creek Fina/ ElS 4 September 1996 , 94-033B . T . Y y ' . . , • • Z~t; • ' . Lake Preliminarv PUD Plat (issued February 15, 1994) indicates that the degraded water quality of Shelley Lake can be attributed to upstream agricultural practices. The project site is primarily flat on the north and then slopes to the south toward Saltese Creek. The majority of the soils are somewhat excessively drained, with moderately rapid permeability and only slight potential for erosion. A wetland study identifies Saltese Creek as a"ditched intermittent stream channel" . that is excavated and seasonally flooded. The jurisdictional wetlands qualify as a Category III and are contained within the 20-foot wide channel. The 20-foot drainage channel right-of-way lies within a 35-foot strip of property owned by the Saltese Syndicate and Bud Morrison, who farm the area southeast of the site (Saltese Flats). _ The wetlands are approximately ten to twelve feet in width at the east end of the site and narrow to approximately four feet in width at the west end of the site. According . to the wetland study (Appendix B of the DEIS), there are no wetlands within the project site. _ The addition of impervious surfaces to the site through the construction of homes, driveways; and roads will result in the inability of water to be absorbed in the previously- undeveloped areas and will alter the existing run-off characteristics. Urban pollutants will be picked up and travel with the excess run-off. The amount of fertilizers and weed/pest control chemical products applied to landscaped areas of the site following development are expected to be about the same as those currently applied during agricultural production. However the proposed plat contains open _ space areas along Saltese Creek that provide a minimum of 45 to 50 feet between the wetland edge and the proposed lots and current agricultural production takes place ~ adjacent te the wEtland edge. There#ore the proposed change in Oand use from ! agricultural production to the proposed residential plat may decrease the potential for contamination of Saltese Creek by fertilizers and weed/pest control products. The ten-year design storm run-off from localized on-site basins will be disposed of using "208" grass percolation areas and drywells in accordance with County regulations. Most of the soils on the project site appear to be compatible with the use ~ of drywells and grassy swales and the variable topography of the site will likely result in a variety of inethods to capture and dispose of run-off. Grassed percolation areas will be designed to store the first one-half inch of run-off which contains ~ approximately 90 percent of the contaminants from any run-off event. Depending on ` ;R the type of contaminant, various physical, chemical, and biological processes active ~ within the root zone remove between 20 and 99 percent of the contaminants. The proposed site plan provides an open space corridor along the southwestern boundary, ranging from a minimum of 30 feet to more than 120 feet in width. Thirty foot on-site wetland buffers are designated within the open space area. Along with the 15-foot strip of property owned by others between the ditch right-of-way and the project site, and the area within the ditch not classified as wetlands, a minimum of 45 . to 50 feet is provided between the wetlands and the proposed lots. The State Turt/e Creek Final ElS 5 September 1996 94-033B , ! ; r y' _ •j'.l ' Department of Ecology has determined that the buffers provided are appropriate. The wetlands analysis indicates that the combined buffer should more than adequately . protect the wetland. Additional mitigation proposed includes planting native shrubs within the 30-foot buffer area as part of a native growth landscape plan. The open space/buffer area will be delineated to prevent encroachment by adjacent lots and the . buffer area could be placed in a Native Growth Protection Easement to ensure the area is maintained in native vegetation. BUILT ENVIRONMENT 1.0 Land Use The Comprehensive Plan designation for the project site and immediate surrounding properties is Urban. Residential net densities range from one to 17 units per acre in the Urban category. The site lies inside of the ASA, WWMA, GSSA, PSSA, and UTA ~ boundaries. The existing zone classification of the project site and surrounding area is Urban Residential 3.5 (UR-3.5), which is consistent with the Urban category of the County's Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category contains no specific goals, objectives, or decision guidelines (policies) for retention of agricultural properties. Preservation of agricultural land is achieved under the Rural and Semi-Rural designations. The Comprehensive Plan does not and never intended to recognize or apply the goal of preservation of agricultural land within the Urban category. Approximately 6.7 acres of the site are designatt:d as open space mostly along Saltese - Creek. A minimum 30-foot wetland buffer area along the southern property boundary within the open space area wiil be preservEd and enhanced wirh additional plantings to protect the wetlands associated with the creek. The proposed development will include the installation of underground utilities, street lights, and paved streets. Sidewalks will be provided along public roads as specified in the County Arterial Road Plan. The maximum density permitted in the UR-3.5 zone is three and one-half dwelling units per acre. The minimum lot area is 10,000 square feet unless the lots are ~ clustered in a PUD overlay zone. Approximately 117 units could be allowed on the 39.0 acre site under the exist+ng UR-3.5 zoning, although only 101 units are proposed. . Given the 6.7 acres designated as open space, if the plat were proposed as a PUD with bonus density, this would allow development of 132 units (33.6 net acres x 3.95 units per acre) on the project site, approximately 31 more units than the 101 lots proposed. However clustering of smaller lots is not part of the proposed action. The proposed net density is 3.0 units per acre, including open space areas, and the minimum lot area proposed is 10,000 square feet. The overall gross density proposed is 2.6 units per acre. The proposed project complies with all the goals and policies of f. the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and the requirements of the UR-3.5 zone. Turtle Creek Final ElS 6 September 1996 94-033B i . 3 ' • ' • a . . . •'1 Spokane County is currently working toward established Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries. The proposed project is in conformance with the County's adopted Critical Area Policies for Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas. The site is not classified by the County as a natural r,esource land. : The proposed development site consists of cultivated fields and undeveloped open • spaces. The project site-and surrounding area is located on the fringe of a developing area that is transitioning to urban land uses. The predominant characteristics of the f surrounding area are suburban to the north and east and agricultural to the south and ~ west. Preliminary plats of Pheasant Park and Meadowview Ranch Estates have been approved to the north and east, respectively. Pheasant Park consists of nine one-acre lots. Meadowview Ranch Estates consists of 35 lots with an overall density of 2.5 units per acre. Lots to the north of the project site vary in size from one to five acres. The project proponent for Turtle Creek has also filed an application with the County •.Division of Building and Planning for preliminary ptat approval of Morningside Heights PUD. The Morningside Heights PUD Preliminary Plat was approved by the County Hearing Examiner on August 15, 1996 and includes development of 335 single-family lots on approximately 147.1 acres located approximately three-quarters of a mile southwest of the Turtle Creek site. The Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) for Morn,ingside Heights PUD are incorporated by reference into the Draft and Final EISs for Turtle Creek. The Morningside Heights Draft EIS establishes a study area boundary based on zoning code and Comprehensive Plan designations, access requirements, and topographic constrainis which includes the proposed Turtle Creek plat. Other applications for preliminary plat approval have been submitted to the County Division of Building and Planning and are currently in various stages of the review/approval process. The potential exists for adjacent property owners to also request preliminary plat approval to subdivide their property. The previous owner of the Turtle Creek site also owns approximately 136.8 acres south of Turtle Creek. Implementation of the proposed action would result in a level of development which would be more intensive than existing land uses to the north and west, where residences developed without sewers, and to the south which is active farmland. However the density proposed is consistent with adjacent approved (Meadowview ' Ranch Estates) and proposed (Meadowview Terrace) residential developments to the , east. Extension of public sewer to the area has already been approved to serve Meadowview Ranch Estates and Morningside PUD. The proposed project will utilize ' the existing water main and the planned sewer main in 8th Avenue. The potential for ' growth inducement in the area already exists due to the existing combination of County plans and regulations (i.e., UR-3.5 zoning) that provide the opportunity for ~ subdivisions to occur. The primary determinant in defining future land uses is ~ ~ governmental decisions regarding implementation of zoning classifications, Comprehensive Plan designations, and other municipal planning tools. Housing market 'conditions stimulate development requests when an economic return is offered that ' did not previously exist. Approval of the proposed action may be an added stimulus r L' Turtle Creek Final ElS 7 September 1996 94-033B ~ ~ . „ . •~,,r: . . for development of surrounding undeveloped property, but wouid not be the primary ' factor contributing to growth in the area. The existing agricultural land use character of the site would be altered due to the introduction of single-family residences and public services. The impact on adjacent farming activities would not preclude agricultural use or productivity of adjacent lands. ~ Impacts from adjacent agricultural uses would primarily be related to dust, chemicals ' (pesticides and fertilizers), odors, and noise. A condition of the approved preliminary plat could require that a notice be placed directly on the plat recognizing the adjacent ~ agricultural land uses. 2.0 Transportation ~ . . ~ The Barker Road Traffic Impact Analysis and Corridor Study (Appendix C of the DEIS) analyied existing and projected levels of service (LOS) at area intersections. The PM peak hour cumulative traffic impacts were the most significant and controlled the ` mitigation needed as a result of traffic generated by Turtle Creek and the surrounding r area. Existing levels of service at the study intersections for the PM peak hour along + the Barker Road corridor range from LOS A at Sprague and 8th Avenues, LOS C at Appleway, and LOSsC andD at the I-90 ramps. The intersection of Sprague Avenue and Appleway is presently functioning at LOS D in the AM peak hour and LOS F in the ~ PM peak hour. An LOS of E has been defined as the minimum acceptable LOS for the City and County of Spokane. Additional traffic occurring over the next three years from sources other than Turtle Creek was- added to the transportation system in the following proportions: 120 single-family dwelling units (SFDUs) from Riverwalk and 35 SFDUs from Meadowview ' Ranch Estates (both previously approved projects), and 120 SFDUs from Morningside Heights and 40 SFDUs from Meadowview Terrace (both proposed projects). These projects encompass the reasonably anticipated development in the Barker Road area ; which is anticipated to happen within the next three years. Only the reasonably expected build-out which is'proposed to occur during the completion of the Turtle ! Creek alternatives is included. Turtle Creek could contribute a measurable amount of traffic to the Barker Road ! corridor. Of the "short distance" commuters from Turtle Creek, some could use Long ~ Avenue as a route to Sprague Avenue. Approximately 5% of the total traffic from Turtle Creek is anticipated to use Long Road, based on field observations. Eastbound ~ traffic returning to Turtle Creek on Sprague Avenue could use Long Road to a greater extent, and was modelled at approximately 35% of the total traffic returning to Turtle Creek. The rest of the "short distance" commuters are expected to go through the intersection of Appleway and Barker Road, and are therefore through vehicles at the intersection of Appleway and, Sprague Avenue. The impacts from the Proposed Action were analyzed under two scenarios; approved ' Turt/e Creek Fina/ ElS 8 September 1996 94-033B ' . . r -.r~,-t . . , ' Y : . plats only and all approved and proposed residential developments that couid ~ contribute traffic to the Barker Road corridor. Under the first scenario, the intersection having the most change in LOS is Barker Road and the eastbound I-90 ramps. During the PM peak hour, the LOS drops from LOS C to. LOS E. Under the second scenario, it drops from LOS C to LOS F. . Under the No-Action alternative, development in the surrounding area is expected to . continue as presently planned. The greatest LOS change from present in the year - 2005 afso occurs at the Barker Road and eastbound 1-90 ramps. During the PM peak hour the LOS drops from LOS C to LOS E. Development of the Turtle Creek plat in and of itself would not lower existing ~ intersection levels of service to below acceptable limits. Specific mitigation at any area'intersection is not required solely by development of the Proposed Action. "'The first improvement needed within the Barker Road corridor area with full build-out - is signalization of Barker Road and the eastbound I-90 ramp terminals. This improvement is not specifically attributable to the proposed Turtle Creek plat, but is due to development of an additional 360 lots in the corridor area. With establishment - by Spokane County of a mechanism such as a traffic impact area, development within the Barker Road corridor from any source and at any level could provide a monetary contribution to a fund managed by Spokane County. These funds could be used'to implement the transportation system elements needed due to development of Turtle Creek or from any other source. For the first 36C lots approved, the fee to accomplish the first improvement needed is S465 per lot (360 lots x $465 = $167,400). Turtle Creek's proportionate share of the required mitigation could be adequately addressed with application of a $465 per single-family dwelling unit fee, due with acquisition of building permits. : I . If the above fee mechanism is not in place to allow contribution and participation by ' . the Turtle Creek project, it could be conditioned to provide stand alone mitigation. The stand alone mitigation is based on improvements already completed or committed ~ to by the Riverwalk project or conditioned as part of the Morningside Heights plat ' approval. The signal at the eastbound I-90 ramp terminal was made a condition of the Morningside Heights plat. W+th the addition of a signal, the intersection of Barker and . - the eastbound I-90 ramp terminals will function at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak hour. The existing pedestrian safety concerns identified by County Engineers along Barker Road are addressed by the separated pathway or the required widening - of Barker Road to 32 feet, which is also a condition placed on the Morningside Heights plat. The Riverwalk project will construct required improvements at the westbound I-90 ramp terrninal. Channelization of the Sprague Avenue and Appleway intersection was explored in various configurations as a means to improve existing conditions, which are currently - below acceptable standards. The instailation of a right turn lane for eastbound traffic Turtle Creek Final EIS 9 September 1996 94-0338 . tirc•%~:r°: • r• - . . . turning south to continue on Sprague Avenue wouid effectively mitigate the impacts caused by the anticipated increase in traffic due to development within the corridor : area during the next three years. With the addition of an eastbound to southbound right turn lane at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Appleway, it continues to function at LOS F in the PM peak hour and in the AM peak hour is shown to improve from LOS E to LOS D. The overall intersection delay will improve and is modelled to be almost identical to what is presently being experienced in the fiefd. Any improvements to this intersection would be the shared responsibility of Spokane County and the proposed project. The signal at the Barker Road and Appleway - intersection could also need future upgrading if the level of service falls below acceptable levels. If required in the future, the proponeni of the Turtle Creek plat could contribute a proportional share to this improvement. . ~ ~ Paving 8th Avenue between Barker Road and Long Road including a pedestrian pathway will likely be a condition of approval for development of the Turtle Creek plat. A hard surface walking path along the eastern side of Long Road between 8th Avenue and 4th Avenue and paving Long Road from 8th Avenue northward to the existing pavement may also be required. No additional mitigation beyond frontage improvements is required or proposed for the Lower Density alternative. No mitigation is required for the No-Action alternative. The principal arterial serving the project site is Barker Road, north of 16th Avenue extended. Minor arterials near the project site include; Barker Road south of 16th Avenue extended; 8th Avenue east of 6arker Road; and Sprague Avenue east of its intersection with App!eway. A collector arterial is planned extending from Barker Road (where its designation changes from principal to minor arterial) west along the Section line to Flora Road extended and then south along the section line to 32nd Avenue. The existing north/south extension of Chapman Road from 32nd Avenue to . Morningside PUD serves to implement a portion of this planned coflector arterial. Local access roads located next to the project site include 8th Avenue west of Barker Road and Long Road. No impacts on the arterial road system are identified with implementation of the Proposed Action. e According to the State Department of Transportation, accident rates higher than two per million enter vehicles (MEV) at an intersection are considered to have safety issues that may require mitigation. The accident rate for the Sprague Avenue and Appleway intersection is 0.8788, weli below the two MEV rate considered the threshold for safety improvement. According to Central Valley School District, this intersection meets a!I the State safety criteria for students to cross Sprague Avenue. The projected increase in vehicular traffic is not expected to increase accident rates above - `the two MEV threshold. Turt/e Creek Final ElS 10 September 1996 94-033B ,i, t C r v . r ''"•1" >`,•3.0 Public Services and Utilit+es Police protection is under the jurisdiction of the Spokane County Sheriff's Department. There is one patrol car assigned to cover each district, which the Sheriff's Department - considers inadequate coverage for the County as a whole. The project site is located within Fire District No. 1's service area. Stations are all manned 24-hours per day by two to five people. The project site is served by Station No. 3 located approximately one mile to the northeast. Average response time is estimated to be approximately two minutes. Additional response could also come from Station No. 5 located approximately four miles northwest and Station No. 7 located approximately three miles southwest of the project site. Ambulance service would be provided by Spokane Ambulance, disbursed from Valley General Hospital located approximately five and one-quarter miles northwest of the project site. Fire Station No. 5 would provide paramedic/rescue services. An additional 101 residential units on previously undeveloped land will add to the responsibility of the fire districts and the Sheriff's Department over a three to five year buiid-out period. Cumulative impacts may result in an increased need for additional staffing and equipment to provide adequate fire protection. The proposed site design includes cul-de-sac streets which limit the potential for burglaries and other crimes. The developed project'will have fire hydrants that will provide an easy and ample water supply for fire fighting purposes. The increased property tax revenues generated by the proposed project will add to public service agency funds and assist with additional manpower and equipment needs. Schools that serve the area within Central Val(ey School District include Greenacres Elementary, Greenacres Junior High, and Central Valley High School. Other schoois serving students in the area include Sunrise Elementary and Horizon Junior High. Currently the District's 13 elementary schools and five junior high schools are nearing maximum capacity. There is still adequate space available at the two high schools. " Capacity levels for each school are based on each grade being totally full. Periodically A a school reaches capacity in some grades but not in others, which has occurred at , both Sunrise and Greenacres Elementaries. ! .,a Greenacres Elementary is currently the only elementary school within the District east of Sullivan Road. It serves the entire eastern portion of the School District, which ' extends east to Liberty Lake. Greenacres Elementary is a large school, with a large enrollment, on a small site. One portable classroom is currently in use. Approximately one-third (over 240) of the students currently attending Greenacres are from the Liberty Lake area. Another seven students residing at Liberty Lake are bussed to other . elementary schools due to the lack of space at Greenacres. Approximately 125 students from ihe Liberty Lake area also presently attend Greenacres Junior High. - According to Dave Jackman at Central Valley School District, the existing capacity problems at Greenacres Elementary and Junior High schools are due to the lack of . Turtle Creek Final ElS 11 September 1996 . 94-033B -c . . v t. i , schools serving the Liberty Lake area. ; District pians include construction of new elementary and junior high schools in the L' Liberty Lake area. These new schools would relieve enrollment pressures at r Greenacres Elementary and Junior High schools. Bond issues are the District's primary source of funds for capital - construction projects. The District's most recent successful bond proposal was approved on February 6, 1996, and will fund construction of a new elementary school near Liberty Lake and remodelling of Bowdish Juniar High. The new elementary school near Liberty Lake is scheduled to start construction in May 1997, with an opening date of September 1997. Approximately 83 new students or 16 to 27 new students per year would be introduced into the District from Turtle Creek, occurring over a three to five-year ~ period. Greenacres Elementary; Sunrise Elementary, and Greenacres Junior High are near or exceed maximum capacity and would be impacted by the addition of new students from this and other residential developments proposed for the area. More students may require bussing outside their home boundaries in the short term and the District's policy that allows students to attend the school of their choice may be limited. Given present enrollment patterns, elementary students residing within Turtle Creek would likely attend Sunrise Elementary until the new elementary school is constructed in Liberty Lake. Following construction of the new school, elementary students fro-m Turtle Creek would attend Greenacres Elementary. Junior high students would attend Horizon Junior High until such time as a new junior high school is constructed in the Liberty Lake area. Other means that could be used by the District ~ to handle the additional students include revising home school boundaries, going to double-sessions, changing to a middle school organization, or impiementing year-round , . ~ ~ schooling. . The proposed project's share of the cumulative impact from full build-out of the study area is approximately six percent, since approximately 83 of the 1,466 total added students within the study area would-come from Turtle Creek. Proposed bond issues, voluntary fee agreements, and increased tax revenues will help fund the District's construction, land acquisition, or capital improvement expenditures. The Turtle Creek ~ development project would generate approximately $75,750 (101 units x $750 per unit) in school mitigation fees that could support acquisition of a portable classroom, a school bus, or contribute towards an expansion or remodel project. Currently there are substantial deficits in neighborhood and community parks in the Valley subareas. The County Parks Department does not have adequate financial resources available for park land acquisition. New residences will impact the County spark system by increasing the demand for park space and facilities at existing parks +n the area. The majority of ihe impact would be on organized sports facilities (ball fields). Approximately 237 new residents would result from full build-out of the proposed project, which is seven percent of the total number of residents estimated in the study area. The Board of County Commissioners suspended use of negotiated , Turt/e Creek Final ElS 12 94-0338 September 1996 , fees to mitigate impacts on parks on September 12, 1995 (Resolution No. 95-1005). There are current limitations to sewer system and waste water treatment plant - a capacity that will need to be addressed to accommodate long-term growth within . Spokane County. Without system improvements or the implementation of alternative effluent disposal methods, existing capacity could be exceeded within ihe next 15 , years. In 1994 plans for a 24-inch sewer line in Long Road, from the 36-inch interceptor south to the 8th Avenue and Long Road intersection and an 8-inch line east in 8th Avenue to Barker Road, were reviewed and subsequently approved by the County. In January 1995 the 8-inch sewer line along 8th Avenue east of Long Road was approved for construction. Due to the unknowns of providing a 24-inch line to the Saltese basin, the County Commissioners directed County Utilities to rescind ~ approval of the 24-inch line in Long Road. The maximum size line allowed for installation in Long Road was reduced to e+ght inches. A Sewer Connection Agreement between Spokane County, the Heptons, and Dahm Development, Inc. was approved in August 1995 (Resolution No. 95-0874) which provides for financing and extension of the 8-inch sewer lines in Long Road and 8th Avenue. The Turtle Creek plat could tie into the sewer lines in 8th Avenue and Long Road currently planned to serve the approved Meadowview Ranch Estates, Morningside, and Morningside Heights subdivisions. Approximately 56 lots within Turtle Creek would gravity flow to 8th Avenue. The remaining 45 lots would be pumped up to gravity flow to 8th Avenue or would gravity flow to the south to a pump station to be - located south of Saltese Creek in the vicinity of Long Road extended. The projected sanitary sewer flow from Turtle Creek at full build-out would be approximately 23,735 gallons per day. The total projected flow for approved and submitted plats (totaling approximately 850 lots at 270 gpd per lot) that may need to utilize the 8-inch sewer line in Long Road is 229,500. There is a difference of opinion between project engineers and County . Utilities Department staff regarding the basic parameters used to estimate sewer capacity. Project engineers have estimated that the 8-inch sewer line as approved can handle approximately 1,100 ERUs, however the County Utilities Division has estimated the capacity of this line at 700 ERUs. Approximately 470 ERUs are currently , committed to ihe Long Road sewer, therefore approximately 230 ERUs are available - for development up-gradient. In regards to the specific Morningside Heights PUD and :=-Turtle Creek preliminary plat applications, ihis analysis indicates that sewer capacity is available. It should also be noted that the capacity limitation for the Long Road ' sewer is based on gravity service only. The proposed pump station will have the ability to store and release flows to the sewer system during off-peak hours, as opposed to those experienced by gravity lines. If 45 lots are served by the proposed _ i pump station, the number of ERUs that can be accommodated by the Long Road . sewer only ;mpacts the 56 lots within the Turtle Creek plat that would gravity flow to 8th Avenue. 5 i, Turtle Creek Final ElS 13 September 1996 94-033B . , The potential for growth inducement in the area already exists due to the existing and approved sewer extensions and zoning classifications. Most of the sewer system ' elements required to serve Turtle Creek are already planned to serve approved and . 1,= proposed plats. A pump station may be required south of Saltese Creek to pump sewage from 45 lots within Turtle Creek up to 8th Avenue and Long Road. As . development occurs, it may create an added stimulus for development of surrounding undeveloped property. The size of the planried sewer lines will present a limitation for _ further development in the area. The proponent of the Turtle Creek plat would provide construction funding for its share of all necessary sewer system elements. . ~ . ~ ~ - ~ ~ Turtle Creek Final E/S 14 September 1996 94-0338 . .~.1 t . ~ I i• • Ch •1, . / . ' , . 625 0 ~ ► ?NA 0 f-01 6?1 ~ '~ie ~ - ~ ~ ' / J P ~ .~S.i kn~'" = ubs y . • • 61 d -L.A-~tiC~ Pd~ ~ ~nitand 5 621 ~ EmPire I Zoo ~ ~ i ~ ~ ► '1 . - / \ ~ • • ~ . ; I . ^ , ~r~,►11~'7, _ . r -c / (,~C ; • 1 °►`r.~~ ' ~ ~._.7 ~r,.... ' l . • - o S1TE 1Q - er _ Carls • _ ~ ~ ~YtywateT' ~ 631 .`1~t.~{:~i►i2 ~i; i 1 } ~ ~l~~'V"~ • ' t -1- ,r• t. 1 i . , . ~iir ' . ~ / I~ ,J • • ~ ' / ~i 1 1 ~ \ 1 ,r ' W at r ~s "fan ' • . t,, , , ~ ~ , • ti ir ~ t ' ^ ~ti j ~i N ; i , ' ~ ' - ~ • 1 ~ ~ ` 'ti~,111 , , ` ~ ~ 'r- • ` ~ ~ ` • r ~ r ~ C y ~o'~„~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . , ~ • - ' ~ ~ - ~ ' , ~ ` - " ' . ~1 / ' ~ 1 ~ C'7 ~ r ` ~'A~~l"~ 31 .t i ! ' i a' .L~ '...+~'"~'tll~~~ ~ f < j~ ~ . 1 l.► t~~ t . , t • _ 1 jf ; - . ; ' r ~ - • , .f'` ` t -,-r- ~ 'N \ ) ~ j ; 1_ + ^.--,r'"'~~ ~ ~ ~ j t ' 1 • f .r~•"~'.~.' .1 1 t / ll,. ~ ~ ,1 \ ; r ~ ~ 5 1 , ~ ~ • ~ . ~ ~ • , ~ , • l ~ 1 I ~ ~ ' j j ~ ' 1 ~ ' ` ~ ~ ( ~ ~ 11 i~~'Z ~ i I ~ i ' ' ~ , , ` ~ ; j i , ~ 1 ~ ; ~ ~ _ . Z ~ ~ o ~ ► ~ ► , 1 . ( - , , . ~ , ° ~ ~ . - , ; , - ~ ' : V ~ ~ ~ ~ ' r' . ^ • t I , , , r.; 1 , . . ~ ~ . ► ~ ~ ` ~ , •^L.' ~ ~ L- { } ' - ~ ~ .t i` • \,~,1~ 1':i • Q . t_ _y: • J ~ , ~ ' ~ ~i 'i 1 ► r,. f- • ti t-~~, . ~94 avApf tANGLE . ~ . F~GVRE N. ; ; ~ ~ ' ' ; • % ' SH~NG10N - IDp►N~ - • ~ Ap ' ' ~ ' [~t1►NuTE sPo~`NE•''' , - - tA y►S'~ 6o V~GIt CE: U.S 30X ` . . SQV~ pONE ' . ! SCALE~ • ~ TuRTLE CREE~ ST p►TEMENT 19g5 1 ~ AGT oA.~. • Av~~ST ENV~R~~ME~►T pl. ~MP 1.. g4 0338 pR~ECT NO.: - ~ SpClATES. ING' RAMM AS ~ - ~ • . ~ 13 18 caa cas=c - . a ~ ~ . .o .o .1•_ • `-v:. ! • • ►-~'r~E 00NED • , o Ag{►N • • ~ • Y ~ ~ • • _ • ~ ~ ~ ' • ~ ~ • d I~_ _ O• _ O •~M~~.~ .O - o O I O ~f~ ~~I~~ ~ V • _ ' ~ ~ ' ~ _ • ~ ~ . • • • p • ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • • •O~ ~ ~ • • ~ ~V3~ 0 ,U • . ~p ~ ~ • ~ • • : ~~O • • J O • • % ` • ~ ' ~ : • ' • o Trailer • : = ; ~ o e. ; . ~ • °0' ' o . ' f Park - . J - : . . ° m . l~~'•-• . . . _ . , • • • ~ 'WAY • ~ ~ / 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • • : o • ~ u • ~ • ° o • : 0 1 1 . ° f ~ ~ : _ . ~ ° •o••°• Jrllil.'~i I . ~ ~I • r J ` 'I: ~ . sch s M r . . . _ , . 2038 - : . . . . : • ~ : . = - ,o, ~ o . . oc. . :r: W~'~. ~'1d_ r~dale : C•.. = I ' . 20 . T. . - ~ ~ - _ •~_~~~~~~ILANEo.1J•~~~ ~I ~~,y ~ ---~"--o-- o••: • • •o :w . ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0r:~'• i r . ' :i. ~ . w ~ ~ • AVE o . . . G f ' ~ • o ~ ~ • o . • . . oo~••• •~o. • •o~ o ~ -C<~:~ i.z:::~ ~ ~II~~ ~ . • •4'.~ ooSPRAU ~5 a z::a . • • ° o ♦ . ---r- ~ ~ ~ e o • _ ~ ~ ~ , ~✓a'• ~I • If • • • toO • Cc' _j,,_ ~ ravel Pitx , ' _ - • • • • • - - - • . o ~ • ~ ~ ~ ' . ~C~ ~ . J • ° ~ / ~ ~ •~Y~ • • • A . . . • • • • • ~ _ AVE TAler ~ " ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ° ' ~ / - ~ ~ • . . . . Park ! . . . . ~ . • . . . . . ' ..r • ' ' • ' ' • o . . ~ ~!•C t~ ~ J ~ . . ~ o \ _ ~ ~ ~ . , ❑ ~ 2060°~- - . • ~ _ _ • ~ • • • • , . e <~~l• ':=~.`f-~ / . . . . • - k ~p ~~i , . . . . . : ~ , ~ . . • ~ J , . , a , : , -ti • ~ " ry ~ ~ • `u'• •1'n ° = o ~ • • . _ t o nl o : . t ~7 ~ ~alVallq ~ 24 ~ . J.)~i ~ \ • ~ • • ~ . 0 . Seh ~ ~v ' I ,•i, i ~Se~ra e Oisposai 14 1 ds . o ~ ~ , SITE Pit ~ . . . I• ~ ~ ~X?`,~' )C~ ~ ♦ ~ , i rl ~ ry ' ~ 1 • - - . . - - • - - - , 1 . : : . . I ; n !fr • ~ ~ , ~~1 ~ , ~ _;I___= ___4~ ' p r J'~:'-/ ~ ` • ' ` a`_ I x;• a PitC Oo ~ ~ • • • ~ • . ' t ~ I 2100 8M Nn n % • , ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ . ' Pi ~ 2083 r~~ l~ • ~ `y.:~ • ' • ~ ' ' ' ~ -F ' "k- - - = ~ ~ j - / . ~ ~ • , Q,~ . Y~ ~ ~ ~ ( C I ~ l~ ~ ~ • % `~'/J ~ r'• o':~ ~ ' ~ ~ , I ~ ; ~ : ' ~ ~ ~ •1 ~ ~ 1~ ~?2 ► / ` ~ 1 ~ ~~b / / ~ ;':i ~°~J' ; . I ~ 4i , I . i . _ . l__ ~ titi• j / \ ~ ) i.,~ ,l t .1 \ iv~ . • 1~ , ~ . . o~ . , , i ~ i i ~ \ , ~ o . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . =a~ , \ ~ I ~ 1 , ~ , o~, t ,/I.:---'- • , / ' , ~ ' ~ ~ ,I ~1. ~ ~ :1~:,~ ~ a f : . • : • , . 1 ) ~ : ~ ~ l ete ~ (!T~ c. to 1 ~ . ~ '~1 1 • ~M~' I / l . ~1 a`v~•` 3Q ~ 1 i~, ` 1.~ Y ~c=:1 ~ 1' f / • I I , I f ~ ~ ~ ' ' 1 0 ) ` • ..d ~ ` ~ l X,?JB/ . ~ ~ljOO ~ C~.. , • i ~ I "~1;; . ~ , } ~ , ' , ~ - `..1 . ~ . I • • ~Ir1 u " • i Y ~ ~ , i ~K, •i j ( I p II •J~ ( •.I' 1 ~ ~ ' ~ . ' , • l Q ~ r ti ~if , ~ . I ~ ;~_n. , ~~x . iangeE~ ~ . BM,2227 I:HA II• ( • ~ ' : p' ROAO ie~l~ • '~i ' ' ► Ti I 1 BM 2129 . • w ~'J • ( ( ~ g Cem ~ . ' . ~ ' - r~l ( F a 1 ~ ` . ~ - ~ ~ ~ . - . ~ . ' ' ~ 10 / ' ♦ ~ ~ - 36 ~P60 o ~ 1iJ 31 132 f,,~' . . . ~ i ~ /=-71 ]1 ! l t~ • r' ' I ~y' / . .1. ~ ~/I ~ . _1, \l ~ a c ~ 4 a ~ ( ~ ~ l4 ~~//~r~ I/-~~ / / ~i'.. / V % ~ I , ~ t/ J - 2 ~ . ' j•- ~ / p l _ / , 4 ~ o = ° ~a T~...~ , 1 ~ ~ e74 Q` 4 - - j?'~==t_ .S1 . ~ p 1 tl/ - %N~ 27 ? - o, ~ oQ . ~ u , Y ~ ~n I l A. T SOURCE: U.S.G.S. 7.5 MINUTE GREENACRES QUADRANGLE DATE: AUGUST 1995 SCALE: NONE • FlGURE NO: , AREA MAP 2 ' PROJECT NO.: 94-033B ~ TURTLE CREEK RAMM ASSOC/ATES, INC. . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT r-- _ ~ ~ - ' j ~ 'r~l~~ ~ 1f .Y.,~" f ~ ~z~~' ~~'c, ~ ' r ''~~/til~,~ . , . , ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ b ~ ~ ~ a l. ' :~~:`r , ; ~b ~ ~4~ ~ M : m o ~ ~ ~o' cn x? , ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~M a ~ ~~~a'~ ~i~ ~a~~~ ~i n l t ;~f ~l u a~ ~ ~ ~b ~b~'c~~~ / ~ . ~ g o ~ ~P ~~N~ ~ ~9 ~°4~ r~M t~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ i~~'" ~ ~ c~~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Q: x ~ y`'`~~r,~~' ~ ;i s - f ~ ~ y .~~Q ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~zp v~j~~ ~M~N V~'~ ' ~ 1,;":; ` I ! .r . ~ ~i ~tl ~ ~ il~~► . ~ ~~o~,~~N ~a ~ a ; : r~ , ~ ~ ~i F ~ U ~ ~ b ~ ~o~ ~ ~ r; ` ~ L b ~rn~' N ~ ~ ° ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ > a ~ Q ~ c~ ':i~~~. ~ 1 R ~ ~ ~ ~ ~w~''v ~ d ~ ~ rl 0 , , ~ ~ 1 : ,}sX~ Z . ~ Pu t o . ~ , 1 ' i.'i ♦/v ~ ~t<O~IIrO } ~Q ~ ~ ♦ ~ r/ ~4 / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~o y~ qao ~ ~ ~u ~G' ? ~ ~:~~:~~:,/w' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :°y~~'~a~~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ i i ~ ~b ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~t ~M`~+~~~O ~~I R~ ~ ~ ~ . ` b~ 11 ~ ~,~'.!~Mp~ ~A ~ ~ /i ~ ,1 OV ~ I' I Y ~ * ~J~ r . ~ 1 f ~ 5~,~~i~ ~ ~ ~ U+. 1` ~ ~ ~ _ ~ s F ~ r~ 1'~-" ~ . ' ~ p` ~ ~ r~ Z j1 ,1 ~ ~ ' ~~7 ~Nq ! f~ t~~ J ~ ~~~j~~ ~~.~i~~~f l ` ~ +~Y~.~ D 70 ~~~f( ~ ~ ~ QG ~ ~M~~ ~ f 1~~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 y)7. ~1F~ ~j~~ ~ N ~ } p - 'j1 1 ~ rr y • , ~ ' U e , ,l,I' ~ ,~~~~~~1~' ° ~ ' O~p / f.~Nli .,a ~ ~'1 ~~,r ~ tl~ ~ f ,~}t~,~l ~t "1f ~1v Y+ r l;~,.''•",+~~ ~ , 0~ ~1 r ~ 1 .~1 I ~ f1 j :t ~ / 1 Q o ~ a K : r 4~ . ::1;, , ! ~ , ; 1 w 1~~D u ' 1 ~ ' i''~ ~ rj 1,7, ; ~l<,; ~ ; ' ~ : ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~x; ~ ~ ~ r~j ` ~ ~ + . ~s I ~ J ~ ~~~~~~'~i! ~ ~ a : ~ {I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1, ~ ~ ' 1 ~ i•~ ~J.~~~()k ~ ro ~ 1 ,d,,,~,~w~ ( r~ , ~s ~'~r ~ ~~'l~ 71' ° ` ~t 4 ~ ~ pi , , ~ ; O 4 ~C% > ~,1 ~,i~ 1 n~1 i' ~ y~ N J1L~" - g / ' , 1 , ~ ' ~ N~ Ih ~ i~1~~11'~~~~' ~ 1!p r 1~~~ ~0 ~ . ~ 1 ~ ~'1 i y ~ ~ .,+,f ~ V • b 1'' ~ r. ~;~~~~,r~ 4 ~ J ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' i~ ; ' 1 [~1' ~ ' ~r t ~ ' t ~b,.., ~ , A tti► ~r ~ ` 1 \I;y ~ ~,,.....ti ~J.,;~ r ~ti i ~~.u ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r y ltl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 a ~ ` i t~ ~ ' ~~'~4 ~ ' •'et r~ , ~ ; , 1 1 ~ ' 3~ t ~ ~ ~ ~r~ ' k^ y~I~~~, ~ ~ ~ „ ~ ~.I ~ + ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ S ~ , ~ `•\•~t~a, ~ ~'....i. , ~+o 1 ~ ~ +td j t ~r' .~f~t. r J 't ~ \u" ~ .1 ~ I~.~~ ~ ~ ~N{; •4 ~ ~~~I r'0, ~ ~1~ ~1 ~1 /Q~~ i ; ~ 1 N ~ {1O 1 1 ` r'' ~ , ~ ' { , ' ~ m a j ~ ' ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ' i0►', r,4 ( ~ ' ' 0 ~ ~ $ ~ r .l' ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ' 1' ~ ~ , ~ `i" Z , ? 1 ~ ~,i,' 1 r i ~ ~ . ~ , ` ~ Q ~ 'o , ; ~ ,L,_- ~ ` ~ , ' ~ ~ ' I I~~N ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ . . ~ 1 . ~ I Y ~ i ~ /"1„u 1 a ( ~cr~ , ' f: ~ ~ r ~N' i ' 'N,, '8\% I < < ~t~ H i 1 a~' , ~ ~ . ~ . ► r1 •i 1 i , j ~ ~ ;~.•R~ ~ , . • . f ~ , ~ a ' , , 1 ' ~ 1 ~ 1' ;G~„r a ~~t ~ ~ 1 N ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ e~^ i~i.'f'~'n~ ~j?~?;t, ' ~~'.I ~e+~y„ ~ ~ , . ~ e ~ , .."v,} ,n~~~•`4 1 ~ ' ~ ~ Y~~~~1~ ~f1s Q :5 ~j~ , 1 ~ 4 ~ ~1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7'+. "l~?t~P7' ~k~,E~r) ~ . ` i~` ^ ' ,N 1~ ;,~1~ ~}~,S t'1:'~` ~ ~1~ 'W 'Y ~ ! ' 1, 1 ' x' ° ' >~'!''i1 v~ f ~ ( ~ ^ ~~1~ ~ _ , 'a ~4 i~ i~'~~~ t ~yi r'V ~ ~t , ~ 6 i~ ~~~~~~.~'u~'° ~ I ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~1 1 y ♦ ~1 ~1`~, ^^w.. ~ ' , ~ `1 1 ~~'rr'.'~,~i,e~v:;, o. ~ • '7~..~ ~A ~11 ;t ~t•o.S~ ` .,r~ :r '111 ~ ~ , ~1~ ~ ; ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ • • N~ ~ ~ ~ i , y1 t. ' ~ % ~i~~ ~ „ b ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ , ~ ,JA . ~ t;4 ~ ~ . ~o ~ , ~ t~ , ~~l•,~ ,i~ ~ bS~l~ ; ~~1~ ~ ' W ~ ' . ' ' . :',~-0 0~p4,.~; 1~~1 ilb, ~ ; r'~' ; ,~r ~ ~~~ti 6 I' 1~ , 1 . 'f ~tib~~ M' u:':7!~;~ : ~ Q c!!' ~ ~ i ~ ! ~ ~ ~ W ' ~ ~ ` ~ / ,a ~o a , ~ , IFl ~ ~ ~,J' tr~', ~;i~~4~'~~j;,'~', b ' ~ ' ~ 1 ~ j? , . ~ ~ ,:f+R~ Yi~,'':~k~ (~b~~'~ • ~ ~7i11~ (I~ r J,/, ~ 1~, • ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 a~ ' r: x~ ~ ~ N ' ~ ~ /y' r' , t$ ~ i 1.. 11~M1` `~~•t ~i' •ti ~ Sn.1'~~b~ .i ~ t 1 . a'• ,~4~ ~a+'1 D ~ `I ~ > z„ ~ s. ~ ~l ' • N'' ~ ~ E .~r, ~5~~~'a`~~.~~'.r..,3~ .~.I ~N~; , Z . ~ 11 f~~~•~ ~ ! ~ ~r ~ k ~ ' ~r >r~.~,Y~~h:~. ~1 t ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ J '1 ~ 'i ~ d ta ~ ` ~ I ' ' + ~ r~ 1 ` 1'y \ ~ ~ ~ I ~ N . , ' G r i 1~ ~4 q5, SY'. ,5 ` ' ~ O N ~~o~ ~ ~ I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , g _ ~ " . ~ g;;. ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~,Ii ; ~ ` 1 ~ . • ~ ~ ~ x , ,j~~ ~ ~ ~ 'r~tn " ; ~ ' y I,'' ~ i i1e ' ~ar 1 ' '',.R , . ~ i ~ 1 1 k o ~ ~ t; o ,~<<~*~~~~~.• • ` a~ i~ U1 rtl~ Ni • '7 1 ~ ~ If ~ ~ • , ~ ~ 1 P✓ 11 ~ ~ ~i~ \ W ~ ~ ~ 'u+ a i .r'' ~ w `3 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ! ~ cp 9 1 1 ~ , W s ' / ~ j ~f i~ ~ \ ~ ',pj,~ ~ ' ~ , ~ r~ ' ';I t , ' N 0'+ ~ j ~ ` • I. ~ I~I ~ ~ ~ q 1'~ i r~ 1 I r t I~ I~ I lj ~ `6 ~ ~ N ~ 1 t ~~rr;;~l , ~ ~yi~ I ,I~ e ~ p~ , 1 (I~ I , , ' b ~ ~ i i : ; , ~ul~~{ ~I~ 6 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ .,i,~'~1~;; ' !:~~;~~'`,i''~' ~ t~,', , w~N e 1 ~ ~ ~ i ~ ; ~ ~ t,,; ; , ; ►,,il;i~, 4~1~ Q-~ ~ ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~1~~ i'j~~i ~ ~~~j~~''~~ 1~;; ^Q1 ~ , ~ r1~~M,~1 ~ ~1 , . ~ , ~ i ' ,w n 1 ~ li ~t! ' k~~ ~ { ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' r , 1,++ ` ~1 N ~ td~~~ , ,1 ~ N . ~ ' ! ~ 'i I~ ~ . .1 ~ I~t •~''1~'1 i ~ '1\~~ ~ y ''y. , ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~L ~ 1i i;i;l~; ~ ,.`~''r 4 ~ ` ' ~ 1~i (I b{i ~~I~~~~'~~~ • ' ~ , N • ,~,,1` . iar:' 4 } y w,a~~ . ; ' ~t II ~flp ,1~ ;dl~~~ ~N , 1 t'~, ~ ~ ; ' !i , :,s~ R; ~ 1~ ~ ~ ' O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' \ ~M1 ` ~ \ ~w• ~ ,i ~ ~ , ~ ♦ y'~.~~ ~ ~ ^ '~,i~:.alt~~, ~i,1.\~ ~ , ~,i 1 , ~\s : , •'y" c , ~ 9 ~ , y; ' , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ M w 1 ~ " ~ ~ t , . J ~ ~ r ~ , 1 ~U , ~ ;!J ~ / ~ ~ "r ~ (1 ~ ~ ° ~ ) ~ C~ ~ ~ ,°z b ~ , , . . • f . ~ _ ~ ~ ` , ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ - r 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , "a ~i C~ ~ ~ ' i / f . r' ~ r~ ~ L ~ N j ~ y~ ~ r~ ~ 1 - p j~ ~ ~J t. O ~ ~ .,,~r.~ . a ~ ' . I ~ 9' c3' Z r~ 9~~ ~ o ~ rr ~ ~y~ 1 ~ i~ a ~ o ~ ro . ~ ~ ~ ~ a . ~ x~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~~u~E ~ MAp 3 l ~ ~ ' ~ p~AT , - _ ~~~M~NARY - pR ~uR,~L~ ~REEK . ~ SGp,~E; N~NE , , - ~ T STATEMENt - , g95 ~ {~C ' DAtE~ AU~usY ~ NM~NTp~ 1MP - , ' f . - , i __..,r un.: 94•p336 , E~~~R~ , i tES' f'"C' . . RAMM ASSOCIp ' . ~ ~ , . . ~ ~ . .T . . ' g~,g'~ r,,..-- ~ ~ • r- ~ -f i'~U;{liu,~;~, l c~ ° A ..r + 'i "'(~`r! ;';r ~ ~ ~ Q o~r ~n'~ ~ ' 1 j~! 1r ' ~~~~~~~~'l'~ l Cs n~"c ~~~~~~~'~Q ~ ~ ~ f~ r~, v a fin ~ (~'Q'y ~yNQ~~~p~}.~ ~ x ~ ~pN.~roO~(]S~ ~ ~ l ~~i c~ ~r,}';1,~ ~ ~ ~ o ro~ y~}~~~~ .~af mo~~ii~ ~ r~j t~ ~~j~,,fw ~~t:,,/,~ ~ p Q y, ~ ~ o~n~a~y~ron~ ro~n~~ ~ gv1f~~v nar+r>~ ~$oltA ~7'~J;~ %~,~f" m R Y n~ f0 GQN OZ;~p'~ 7 Z~ p~, OQ ^n C) f ~;tl~,t;~i~. 'y N ~~M Q (f1 9U1~~ M> ~~X ~7L L~ ~ 1 : ~~t ~ ~ w / yy it Y 7~y O (1u Z f~`'~ ~ I V~ ~ ~ Y11'~~.1~~ I'1 ~~Q~ SV ~1+1 ! ~n; ' 7d ~+~+M t+ J~ r:;~'~! '~r ~ ' ~~x'" p ~~j~,gx~(~c~ `~C' o ~ t,i ;lf'~ ~~~i~ •d,~ / u ra~ d'~ZO~L11'~~~ x ~r^ ~ ; r7~,~r1. ~~t 1, ~ l 'rr. ,j ~6r~ ~ d A'~jQZ O~ Oi V, ~ f~(f':Qli~ t1~ '„'i Ul ~ tf "qS ~1 O J, J~~n.r~'~~~,! i~ ~xn~n fj~N ° ~7 r3 ~i ~ lJ1~;'` f ' ; i ~a N ~ ~i,°^~q{ L [z~ y,~ ~~,rJ~' ~~'~;~'i1~,~1~ ~r-'`+ v ~ ~ r' ~ 'Q8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~C ~ Il~ 14 r X ~ 4y ' ,>~}~'~1+~ ~ ~i P1~ ~ m-v ~ '°~0~~ d ~ h / ~ ~ x~ ~ N ~ ~ Q►or'~"~~ xs ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~..1;l~~;~~ j ~ ~rf'~ , ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ u~v~~g rm ~r Q .i~1+,~'.~~,''Cr~~~tE t~ y ♦ " 7 e <O n ~p y ~ p0 d i. .1 ~ ~s~' ~ ,1/, ^ ~ ~ , t(1 v ~~4~ Y~?:r ~ ~ A:~ Q~ Fr ~ f r;,,+1. ~ 1 ~ , t ~"R► «%~,~,Z~~ xnx u ' ' ~ y s~~-'' r 9 xx ~t F+ `l ~d ac ~ J~10~ , ~1:;'r';. , ~ ~ ` ~ Ch Z ~ 3~~~°r^~ p ~~n~a~o ~ . ~ n~;+t~,. i : r~ ~ ~ p ~ ~'"g ~ N~/:,,•; ~ ; i = p , ~s F~ri~ I o.'~o x° ~A n . ~i t' ti ` ~ ` o ~ g ~ ~ i> ~ i~~ ~~~n~ r~O .c ~ ~ t~~~ t~ r^'%~t.~".: , t~~ '1 p,~ w ~ ~An . N(~ Y ~ ~i ~ , . n ~~70 ~ ~ . rq ~0~*s ~I° r l a ~ '~i~ ~ ' ~ ~t o ~ ~ ' 1 v> r1 Y~, ~t~ > Nt7 M4 ~Y ~ G~, ' N ~ $~O% O~ VrtN~~} c~ ;1 ,J.~M~~ ,,~;,l~t~ r• ~ 1 r ~ ~ N ' n !!Z p0,'~ Z 00~' 1'r~ , ; ii%ii11(~~ Y~ i0 ry ~O . N N~~j ~ ~ r(`~ %i. ti.. ~ P '~~L~+ s r' p x „.,~1~►ri`.j.j~'~! ',f~~: ' ~ ~ ~ i V ~ ~ b~"~ ~ ' . ~t11dY 1yy? f,• ~ ~ Y p ~ mA~ 1 J ~ ~ Yj • ~i"1 ~ 4Z)r1 ~1~ ' N p ~ ~ } l~r~~iJq~r~ ~'t'~~~ ~ ~ . i ~ i t ~ ~ro~ .Ni f~ ~~,ui . .r' /y~%~~i]I~~1~t1, '„v l ~~r,r'~s` b~ ° 4 y;~;,~c;;~; ~ 1~ ' ' ~ 1 o p~ r` 'r~{?1' : j ' w , ~,~h ~~'1,,;;;~~~(r f;'" 1 ~ ~ a ;;,.~~~:f,, ~ , , ;rr;t,t ~ •~~~t;'~ni ' i ; ~ ; ~ ~ j~~'~''ll~il~ ~j~' ~•N 1 ! 1 i~ll~: j i~ I+~ ~ ' ! ~ ~ ` ~~ti•. ~ rr' 1 J}i'j~i1lii ~i; 1 1I ~ b~ ~;;ri:~;'tii; i t 1 i s ~ ~~'>r~" 1 ~ p ~ ~ I , `,,1 t` ' ~ a ~ ,,,~•j~~ll~~ ! a ♦ t i ~ ~ . I ,1~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~`~~r~11'`~~,`~i~ i ' 1~ ~ ~ ~M1r f fti.~,) `~~1~,111~1~~1i ~ ! ..r"~ ; ~ ' ` ~ iti:`:.~1 ~~.~'~~Iit~ ,d i a 7u 1 ~ ..tr~~~~",'s'~`~`i,i,,'~,11~ Y"1`~ ` ~ N . ~t ''~w~•;..,R~D' ~ ~V11~~' ~V ~ t+ ~ I 1 j/'; ~~~1t.~~ ~~f "t t (ii ~1 Ij!/. .~.'~~lji~~~,ii,~l'~'~ i ~ ~ ~'~'S r lr~r/"'" -.,,.,tt11~ ` , ; ~ .+rT a Ty. { ~'~,fl~ •1. 1 t~~,'~ h ~ ' 4~~IA 1 t ti• .uii~~ 't 'I a ~ ~ .~~jt~~ f ~ 1 y'' ~ ~ ~i~yj, ;,j':jf. ',~`~1~1'~ti!1\`~' l,` ; ~ A 1 'r ~r ,i ~(/!,'.~i .,,ti,~ ~~;t , ;4''~,` 'j ` '~1 `f-,^'~l'~ +ro}~ `1 ~~/~,~Jti~~'~~~ ~ ~ ' 1 t~ ~ , a ,~~p N 1; ~ ~ ~ / a~„`~`^~; t r} ~ C p ~ tix i' ~ . ~ ~ t~ i i .r' , ? ~ j ; ~ ~a i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " j , ~ ~ • ; ~ ~ , ~ 1 N t r l ~ ,'~,''r ~ f ~ ~ ~ i ~ t ~ ; t ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1 / ' ~ ' ! ' r ~ ~ t i~ • ~ t ; ' . ~ : ~ ~ ~ I r ~ f 1 I r i 1 l .J~i`~i1 ~ i p ~ ~ 1 ~~1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ti, ~~1~~l;~~l ~ i ~ 1 ' i ~ ' t ~1~ ~ ~ . I~~! ~ ; ~ ' ' ~.,1 ; ~ P ~ r~~~~i;, j~ j'~•.`, ' : ; ~ ~ ; ~ . . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~, II~`l`' r, ~ ~ ~ rr~~... ,t ' ~ . 1 ~ . „~i~' ~'ti~ 'r ~ I P~t V~~~~S~~~lil' ' ~'i~r~~, - ' G ~ ! ~ f ,r~~,~= i ~ ±!a 1 i i f 1i ~ ' ~ 1 r! r'S~a~ ~ ~ ~'`~,'1 B~ , ~ 1\~~~ t Y~ / J f• ~ , u ~ I y, ~'~,~~Yy~,7~'~,t u.'~„ «':ti~r~~t ~ ' +~~1~:`~~1 t i' 1 + 't'~'~~r~ / ~ ~ 1 ~4~}3~,tht,ry,'`i~k+ rt'+w°~7i' 'y,~~ ~ttik'$` . 'i~.~ ~ ~l`,4j1'}i~,~~!!~~'1~V ~ ~`,,r~ I ~f;'; ' ~ ~ 1 ~t~~,~~~t~`1''~'jf„~i~1; ~M~ f 4~ 1 r. I~ ; 7 1/ .r' , i M,J4~~.~ t3i • ~ 1~~ ~ 1'~1 ~1 ~ ~ tA~°~,.l,/~, .•J r ! r" ~ , y ~ ~ . Y . `'41~~~~ '~~i 1 i~.. `.1~~ ~~f/✓;f ; t ~'C.~~~~~~Al~.~~~'~'1•~t~l~~j . ~ '•,~~,s, ~ ; r . . • ;i ; 1 ~ s ~ ~;y~S!,;':: i4 ~ , 1 1~ ~ s ~ P ~ ~1~ '~'l i" •.~1` ~ 'i.'/. ,1 i + ~.{a p ~ {y7~; 1 i. , e t ~~5~~1~ ~ i ~ . % .r', 1 i f . . O 1L ; ~ ~'i ~~r~Sl~ ! . , . . , • ~ ~ : ~ ~~t . `~1~~`~1~`+'''~~~i~I t~~'(,+ ..r'„~ ~+r t ~ ' y N . . 1~ l~ ~~1~~` I f ✓'r~,v~I'' ~ ' i 1{ ~ , ~ j{ :~~1ii~ ~ ~ ~ f'O . / + } ~i,iti~l~~lll'~ rl~~' r ~ 'f/" ' ~ 1 ~ i1 1 . ,;3~~Y.'~~;~', ,i, ~ I i r~lli~[~,~ ~y' 1 N ~ 1 ~a. ~ ~ i mt ~ ~ ~S~I,I,~~~''~:~ !~'t ~ ~ ~ ~i~(f~ r~' ` 1 1,,~~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J t ~ ' F ~trt 1 ' ; ~ ~ ~ Z ~ ~ , i . " i' ' r i ~ " CJ~~ ~ Illl~,:~`; ,;~~i.,i~~,~ 1• '/j ,,,,tt ';t 4';1 tl ~ i. . '.r- „i• y~ tjj'~:J~~ , b'~Q~ ' j r'iit~~i., j~~ ~ t N~~ '.\1 ~ 'I r. l~~ I~ i~t r{~ ~ i i i~ ~ 1 ~ i t '.w .Yr ' `"~`,y,`e '~~r ~ ~ ti ~~1i1u~~1~ il ~1 ~ ~ 1 r ~1 ` ~ ~ ~ • , Y~' i, ' ~ y ~ ~ ~ ' l~~'~I, :I'~ `j~~ ~lil;~ ~ ,,.r'~ , 1,1~~1~ ~ j 11' ~ j~ ~~.airyi {Y+~~'~ i , ~ 7¢~j I j ~ tt~1 1.~Y.~i~~'~l'i'~~ ~t~ •(i/ ~i . ~ 'Oy O t ~ . ~ ~ ~ ` i ~ t ,j1{,1f'` 'i~~G~l~'i~'~~ ilr~l +tt rl ~ , 1'`1t,,~, .'~y~,',.,,~ ; ~ ~ N it° ~ . , ~ G ~ 1 , , ~ , ~i ~ ~ ; ' r--''1 , • A. ~ I ~ ~ - ~ ~ ti ~ (1 ~ ~~'i~i' ti~;~ ~ ~ ( J ' t ~ / ~ ' `'~,N, ` ~ ~ o Q ~ a , ~ i I. ~ ~ , , .o~: 1 1 1 .o I ~,u • i ~ ~ . ~ , 1 ' m p C~ ~ ~,q i i~lleqt ~~~~~~~~'~fi! ~ ~j ~ ~1,, ~ ti~,~t ~y ~ 1 N ~ ~ ~ Y z / ; ~ : ` ~ ~;;~~`j~'~;~~~ ; , i ~ , ~ , , ; , I ~ I .c ~ ~},t) ~ ~ ~ttt~.+~~i~il~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ I 1 `~x 1 $ ~0 ~~~~1ar~~~~ ~~~;bqti~~!~j~ii~~ ~i ~ i ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ f~y G p~ . ~ ~~ii1~~(~i.~l ',~V6~~q~,1~~N'}R„11~; ~ > ` ,i'\ t 1 ( 7 f' {A OV ~ ~ i I i I~i'ii~i i~'liy~1~~ ±l~~ ~~~+~{r ' ! ~ ` ' . \ ! I+ 1' ' ~ 1~ '~S~'.~~il' :I ~.il. r± ~ r ~ ~ ~ , ~ 1~', . ~.r 1 ~ 1~~~ i, t~ 4Pk~ (I ( r'+r.~ 1 ~ e~~ 11~~\ ~ 1 'I,+.~ ~ , ~ 1 ~ i' dp=1~~ ~ ! '+r ~ ~ ~ r+,= ~~7 ~~~+r~~~~~~i~{~~~(~~~~. ~ ! ~ ~ '1~ 1,~~ t ' ~ ( i ~ E,.;;, , , ; , ~ u' ~ , r~~;~~,;~~~f,?„~~z~,, ~,I,~ 1 ~ ; , ~ . t ~ ; ~ s, I i ~ ;i ~ ~ i r' ~ ~y , ~'e, ~ ;1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~,l1~~'1!(1i;~~i~~i ~~i~~i~ 7~ i ti ' ~ It ~ ~ ~ ( ~,li + L{f~~ ~ , ~ ~ 'j,~,~ .~i~r~lilyj~~~,(j~~;t{~~ji~~.i. ~ 1 ~ 1 '~1' ` Q u ~ ~ ~ t'J+T t~~~E:~~`.~.'l~~~ ~+~iu~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ " y';'~l;~~~' 1 ~~il~~~~~ (~i ~ 1` ~ ~ ~ ' y,~~~,}y,~~~ ~ p, j' ~ 1 ,i 1 ' , I>',I I ~ p ~.'i,t~~,,~1~I,~~iI'~,~, ~I~~'; ('1~i .,'i t''i` ~ 1,1 11, ,`s , l ~ iq I .'t j 'r ~~y {i~~i ~~~.~~iu ~ 1 , ~ ° t ' y ~ ~ 1 n t8 . r` ''~`~i~~ ~'lll;l' ;t ~ 1~~~~+, ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~~I~~i;~~f ~~1 ~~i~'~~~t~~I'"~ii~~~ ~l~i ~ \ '1 ~ 't ` } ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +i~l~~' ( ii'!i~' ~ ii~ ,r. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,1 ` t 1 ~ • 1~1~ ~~1r,j''~}1~il(1''~r(~ ~l i~ t ~r~} ,~t. ~l t ~ ~ 11'''!fl~ i~iilil~il~"~~1~ ~ ~ ~~~i~ \ 1` }L } 1,ti N'i, ~ Y ~ ~ +Ii~lli'j!';t1~ I~~ ~I nl'~~ ~ I~i t~~ ` R, 1~ ~ 1 ~,'o 1 \r.• ~ I.~~.. j' ~ t ~ 5 ~~1 , I ~ ~u ~i.~~i ,i~l~i i ~ ,Gr~,~ti;~ , ~ ~L ; ~ r r~,, ~r 7~~,~~ i ►~►I , ; ~ , ~ ~I! ii.l~l ~ ~l~~`1'' ~ ' , . ~ ` ~ ~ L~'~., '~R ~ t ~ li nt~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~1 1 ) ~ , i ; p ;',t~,~~; ~ a~<<,i'~1~{! ~l' ; . , ° ~ ~ER ~ ` ~ ~y ~ ~ , , i" ~ j~ .,~~~y,~ ,~ti~~` ~ - ~ t~~ ~ !~1l : J(1'~' ' ,~1 `l ~ t tr i ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ p1~~,....i'" ~•j^ ! 1 ~ t~ t~~~l~~'~~il'I !~~„1; ~r' 1 ~~,t\~4~.~~1 11~ R ra~.. ,1.~,~I'*~ (1'r 1 t} i 4S t' Y~f'~ t~'lt i,~ ~ . ; ~ i ~ i~ ~ . ~ , ) 1 , t 1 r ; t ~ ~ , ; i ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ; ~ , , - ~ O ~ .'t ~ ~ ~ ~~1' , ti'.,'..ti;,:t_,1`~~ ~,~,y ~ l,.. ' ' ~ r1 ; ' ' ~ i ~ ~ ~ i~~~~~~~~;ji5~~~.~ti~• '~`'..:~~1' I~~i~.~'~'~' ~ ~ ~ 1 1~~ ~ IG~O ~ ~7 J ~ ' } ~ ri ~il~ t~~:.'~1~{ ; 1}~i ~•t,•`~,iy "i y.,~~J~~ ~ i y ` 1 y (~i1~ (~f.yl~ ~ ; ~ t r, w\~,t~ ~j'~ ~ F ~ ' ~1 Iy L', ~ i ~ ~'tlt+±~~l l ~II ,..~1 i ~ ~l i .J,r~ ( ~ry ; i 1 1~~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~yty:~ s~ ~ ~ SI ~ ~ 1 1 y ;~~1.7~ t~j' 1j.,~~¢;~y.~ ! R Vs ~ 1"~ l~j ~ ~~'(flti~i: n' • ~ i a:~'FUY'+~'~l+''.~'i~ ~ ~ ~C? R ~ . ~ QO 1 L--" ~ ,....i.rr~,.~ ..~~--~i ~ 70 p ~ w \ 1 ~ ~ /y ~ H ~j ~ : , t~~. "'t ~YfJ ~V i`r,i'~ ~ \ y ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ti' f 7 ~ c~ O ~ r., i., y ~'Tj-rj 4~ +1 n x ~ ~tJ , `x ~ ~ ~ .a y.+~ ~ ~ 1 g 1 ~ z• i y al S C~ 's ~ ~ a ,,..--l~-%=f = p" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'a N ~ ~ ~ s ~ x p~Qa,~ , ~ ~ r-~ d ~.•r 1~ l1 ' 1~ ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ b ~ N ~ ~ ' ~~'~Q ~ ~ ~`o . ~N~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ . Q x z ~ ~ ~ T'~,~ ~~~~P . a , ~ A`,~ERNp ~ _ ~ ~W~R DENS Ap . L r~o►~E TE~EN~ scA~'~~ ~ 1~RT~E ~~EE STA __.~~~,995 r'' _.,Tni iMpA~T SEP7o~ oA~- ' EN~IRON , • R~ ~ M C ~ CIATeS' IN - M ASS° RpM ~ t, i ~ ~ 1 S ' 1~ 1 1 ' . e `r f..i"` ~ • - ~ A ~ ~ ~ ' ~ •1 i 7 4 F ~ ~ ~ ! ~ , i ~ I ' ~ •I ^~v n. It ~J~ • ' .1~ ~ i ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ r ~ ~,'t.~,~ , ~ ~ f F ' , r"( ' • ~ ~ ~ 1 { ~ ~ sL ' ~ , l 7, y ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +f' . 1 ~ ' r ~ ~ 1, . . e( 1 , , , • ~ - ~ ' T ~ ~ : l "`y ' . _ • . , b t' r ~ . ;f '~cw~` ~ • y , / , . ~ ~ _ . • r i ~ '1 0 ~4 ~ 1 _ _ ' ~ , 1 ~ ' . ~ ~ ~ , r \ , y i e'e ~ r' • I✓ , r ~f-, ~4,~,.Si~~" ~ ~ , ~ . ~ t ' 4' , ~ ` 'J ~ . ' 4 , ~ . . ~r' ' ~ I• , ~ . ' ~ ' ' ` ~ ~ { . . ' ~ t . , ~ , % ,~1 ' , ~ ~ ~ n..~. 7 r~ ~ i 1 r~l, ~ • ' ' ' ' , e' ~ ~ • , - ` ' ~,r / ' , , ` , . , „ , ° 'i°" l. • t . , t. ' • ~ r v ~ . , ~ ` i r ' ~ ~ ~~`f~ j7f l ' ~ r, I , , • " ' + ~ ' } `11/l~ ' I~ ` .f. ~f ~ 'I = ` ^ ~1' ' , } , i{ G~ . 1 ' ' 1 1 ~ , ~ , • ~ 1 , , , , t~.,.' ' , . 4 ` , i i , ~ , , l , , ~ 1 . ~ , , - ' - i rr, ~ ~ ' • ~ ~ , , ' ~ , . o.. `r, t,"~j . ''t ~ ~ , . ~ ,t" , • ~ ~ ~ e . } • . . ; •r ~ ~ f ' ~ ~ ~ , . ~ t~ ~ ~ ~ , '4 1 ~ . , ,y„ .l .t~ i•~t ~ ~ .iti ' ~ ~ ~ ; " r^ ' ~ ' } 1 . ~ 7 ' ~ L ~ ~ % i , ~ ~ ~ • , . ~ ~ . ~~1 ' i . _ ~ ~ ~ ! " - ~ . . ~ ~ ~ , ~ . : ~ ' , S' ~ t~' . ~ ~ t ' ^C., i ~ ' , ~ ti " ` - ~ ~.i„~, , ' . i ~ , j ' 1 ~1 ' , . , , . r , . ~~t. , ` , • • I t 1~ i' ~ h ~ ~ i ~ ~ } • , ~ ~ . 1 • ..d " ' t);• f ~ y~ • ! 1 1 ! t . ~ • i ~ . / 1 ~ 1 ~ 1~. ~ 1 , . l ~I ~ u . , v ~ . 1 ~ ~ . ~ Y ' • 1 1 ~ ~11 ~ n~ < ~ 1 ~ i ~ . ~ i ~ !f '1 ' ^ i~ ' ~J• ~ ' r~ , ~rl~ r ~ ' ` / `1`~`M1~ . J,~~ r.~ , , ' i' . ~ . ~ . , ' 1 ' ' ' ~ 1 , ~ ~ J ~ . i • , . ' , ~7 ~'1 ~ ~ ' f ` • ~ 'J/ r 1 1 •L-' + 1~ , I ~ ~ . , ~ ~ } J~ ~ , ~ ~ _ A r, ~ ' ( • , , ~ , ~1 ~ 1 i ~ /1 ' i ~`yn , , ,Q ~ . l r 1 1 ~I ~,1 I 1 ~ ~ • ` - ' ' ('yi.~ ~ • ' ,1 • ~ , ( I• , 4 ~1 1"~ ~ /'r• ' _ ~ ` k t1 ~ . ~i ' . ~ S\-•- , r~f ^ 4 iL` ~ ~ ' ~ l f \ - 1 ~ 1 ~ :~n ,f • ' V, ~ ~ l f , , , y . . ' `."1 .~i` • ~ .i~,,~.~'4, ' . M~ ~t ' ~ . ~,r ~ , et , ~ , ~ ~ t z j ~ ~ . , . ' f - ~r y~" ' ~ , ~ i ~ a~C'• '/f a' ; t ` y ~ i ~ ~Y ; 'r f I, , ~ t ; i . , . , ' ~1 ~ 1 ` . , , ,,,1 ~ , n~ , • ~ i ~ ~ ( ~a ~Y.- r • . ' ~ ~ I ~ J 1~ 1 ll ~ 1' ~ ~ ~ , 1~' } . M:~ ~ 1`• ~ • ~ ^i . 1 j~ ~ i ~ ` ~ '~1 1~ i.1 ' ' ' } ; , 'f• , : • , + , t -y` , . ; 1 , ~ . , ~ , , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ i~,~ • t ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ f' . ~ ~ . . ~ , ~o ~ s . ~ ( i ' ~f i~`~. ~ ~ ~ ~ iti~'i ~ ) ~ i , , ~ ~ r. ~ , ~ ' , i y t . ( `P l r , ' ' . ~ ' • ~ , r , ~ I , / ~ , i- ~t . , • ~ . r { , , ,l , , ~ . ~ ~ , i' , ~ .l` . ~ • • , ~ , ~1 ~ v,,` ~Y ~ ~ . ~ i , ~ Y , . , 2 . • i . / ' f' ' , i, , i' , ~ ~ ~ ~ r . ~ ~ ~ , . , ~ ~ ~ , , ' .I ~ ' ~ i , r / . 'r ~ ' . ~ ' ,r~l • ~ ' , ' ' , ~ • , , ` ~ ti 1 . , ' 1` }j' ~ ' , ' ,o.. • ~ f ! ' r~~ ~ ~ , .~;r~ . . ~ ~ , , 'i 1: ~ i' ~ ~ ` ~ r . ~ ~ + ! V .l' ~ j \ .y,e~ t 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ' y '~t~'t ~ ~ ~ } ~ . 1 • i, ~ ~ ~f, N .7. i ~~i t.✓ ` , r ,r ~ ~y „ i'~ )r '.f l,~ ~ 'i~,~ _ '•,u ~i ,1 t , ~ • 1 t •r : , , . ' I -i ~ ,1~ ~ s' „ ~ ~i ~~.ff . , ~ .~1'• ~ , ~ ~ , J , r ~ ~ r S, 't . - :If ~ ' i•7 ~ . b, t ~ ' t. / ' , ~ N , , , ~ ' ~ f ~ ~S' ~l 1 ~ ' l I' ~ ' ~ - . ' ~ ~ ~ r , , . ~ . , ~ ~ r ' 1 ' r'i'1' t ~ :S~ 7' ' `M~ ~ ;i,l'~ y~ w\3 . ~ ~ ' 4~~ !y 1.`lj,Yl' i, ~ ' r ~ ~ s\~~.~ •1 ~ , ' ~.y ` '1): ~1 ~ . ' l J ~ ' • 'i ' S'\ ; 5 M1 ' ( ' , , 1 } y~ ~4 . 'r t f' , ~ l- ' . , ~ + r ) 'i I ~ ~ 1 ` • 1 . l ~ . ~ i t ' ' , ~ ~ F ~ ~t i rt ~ . ~ . ~ 1~} ~I l' ~ ~ , \ \ ' ~ , . ` ' l ~ , 1~ , '1,,. . ~ . ~ fy ; • ' \ ' ~ AJ~li~` ~ ~1..~~" , " , . ~ ~ , ~ Y i' ' 1 ~ ~ ' 7 ' r ~ J , ' ~ , ^ 1 ~ • ~ c ~ , ~ ~ ~ r 5 , r ~ y ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ , , ' • - t 1 ~ 1~ ' ~1. P ~ ~ f ~ • . ! , 1 ' . ' i `i ' , , ~ r t . 1 ~ i _ •r.~ . t ' • 1•~. ~ ~ r ' ~ . `n~r~ ~ ~ ~ f 1 , ' ~ • i t , 1f ' ' ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ , ~ i~~ ' ~ ' i ~ . , ~ r~,I ` . `i~ , ~ . ~ `l~, ,~t j jt r ~r~•jt~~ • ~f ~ f• ~ ~11'r ' t`~ ~ ~ r. , 1j J~. 1~~^ ( , r:~I ' : t` , ~t.i , ~ /l, r I 'F~ ~ ~ . . . ,,,i'' '1 . ' '1 + ` 1 ' I~ i; ~ ` . ;r, ' , , l~ I, i ! R ' ~ i ~~r,~ ` , ~ , ; ~ ' 1, 3 rl . ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r • ~G. ~ ~ . ~ ~ t~' . , s ) ~ f~ ~ ` . , , ~ . , ~1 + , '~7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~''i~~" Y -•~\I ` r' . .~..1' 1 ~ . r ➢ ,I.' ` ' ~ + ~ , , t ~ r ~ •'f , ' ~ • ~,r• j, 'R ;l'^~` . , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ,I~'~ ~ , .r ~ y , ' r, , , ' r ~ ~ ~ ~ ; . . . . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . . + I ~ ~ 1•1. ~ " 1 Y ~ , . t , ~ ' ` , ~ ' ' ' - t4i 1 .i . ~ , 1 . ` ' 1~ . ~ '~i ; ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ` I , 1 ~ ' • ,I, , J~ f, ` + ' ~ ' j^ ~ , ~ ~ . • , ~r• ti `F',~, , ~~~y . , i ~ , 1 ' ( • ~ . ' , ~ ' ' ' ~ :y. 1° ~ ' ~C ~ ~ 1 . ~ . 'G~ `i ~ • ' ~ ' ~ • - ~ . ~ . ~ , ~ l"•L• f~. • ' . ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i\ ~ ~ . , . . , ~ , . , i , ' ' , • , \ , r ~ ~ ` ' J , i ~•t` • , : / ~ . , . . ~ ~.r , ~ I; , ` , ' ' '~r~• .~,.7~.~ . .'i'~ . , ' , ' - ~ ~ ; ' . r ~ ~ t , • ' ~ r' - ~ ~ , f , , ^ • ~ ~ ~ ' ` ~ ~ 6 REV/EW COMMENTS AND RESPONSES - ~ The foilowing pages represent comments received on the Draft Environmentat Impact Statement for the Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat, reproduced in the original form in which they were received. Specific comments in each letter that call for a response are numbered and corresponding responses are provided. The letters received are on the right side of the document, with numbered responses located on the left side. The responses have been prepared under the direction and coordination of Spokane County's Responsible Official. Written comment letters were received from the following agencies and individuals: ~ . , 1. Washington State Department of Ecology - Rebecca Inman 2. Washington State Department of Ecology - Dennis Beich 3. Washington State Department of Transportation - Leonard Cash 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering - Pat Harper 5. Spokane County Division of Utilities - Jim Legat - 6. Spokane County Division of Engineering - Ed Parry 7. Spokane County Division of Engineering - Tammie Williams 8. Dahm Development, Inc. - Richard Dahm 9. Eugster Haskell - Stephen K. Eugster , 10. Harvey L. and Rosemarie 8.. Brown 11. Patrick R. Brown ~ 12. Theresa L. Brown 13. Bill and Mary Cabbage 14. Linda R. Tasca 15. April Taylor . : . . . Y, . . 3 'e . 'a > > •'~l • ' ' t~:~ir''~ . '.s . a . , . ~6 ~ 4:~. • i Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S 19 September 1996 94-033B , r, • f_l± . . •'y :1t f' • F•Response to Letter No. 1 . ~'ti'• . . Washington State Department of Ecology - Rebecca Inman 1. An appropriate hearing body couid condition the proposed project for compliance with this permit as a mitigation measure. If required, appiication for coverage under Ecology's Baseline General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with lndustrial Activities will be completed following preliminary plat approval, prior to initiating construction activities. 2. Although discharge to the underlying soils may not be an acceptable alternative ~ for those regions west of the Cascades, within Spokane County the Guidelines for Stormwater ManaQement indicate that drywells are the preferred method of ~ discharging water into the underlying soils. This applies whether the project f site {ies inside or outside the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) of Spokane County. - As noted within Section 3. 1 of the DEIS, grassy swales must be utilized for development projects within the ASA to control pollutants from-the first one- half inch of rainfall. Within Spokane County there are acceptable soils and unacceptable soils for discharge via the drywell method. The majority of the project site contains soils that are generally considered pre-approved for drywell discharges. During final design, should any portion of the site be underlain by unacceptable soils, storm water from thE-ae areas will either be routed to an i area where discharge can be accommodated or the outflow will be detained and discharged through Department of Ecology approved oil-water separators to the Saltese Creek area. As determined by the Spokane County Division of Engineering, the release rate for this discharge to the Saltese Creek area must not be any greater than the discharge from the pre-developed 50-year storm , event. The project will comply with the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Manaaement. L ~ t: . f . Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments . LETTER NO. .1 .Z , ^ _ y ~.V . • rµ`i~ -N ~ February 29, 1996 ' HECEIVEC~ SpWNE couIIT"I . Mr. James L. Manson ~ k Spokane County MAR ~ MS-P - 102 6 W Broadway Ave 01V00NpF auii.Q~~ ~D PLANN Spokane WA 99260 aY: . Dear Mr. Manson: Thank:.you for the opportunity to comment on the draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat, proposed by Dahm Development, Incorporated. We reviewed the DEIS and have the following comments. The owner of a construction site which disturbs five acres or _ more of total land area, and which has or will have a discharge of storm water to a surface water or to a storm sewer, must apply for coverage under Ecology's Baseline General Permit for Stoxm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activities. Owners . Qf sites where less than five acres of total land area will be disturbed must also apply if the construction activity is part of a larger plan of development or sale in which more than five acres will eventually be disturbed. Discharge of storm water from such sites without a permit is illegal and subject to . enforcement action by the Department of Ecology. ~ Application should be made at least 30 days prior to commencement of the construction activities. A storm water permit application form, referred to as a Notice of Intent, can be obtained by ~e calling (360) 407-7156. Dry wells are not an acceptable method of disposing of 2 stormwater. Grassy swales, percolation areas, and wet and dry ponds provide better treatment and protection to groundwater. ~ Dry wells should only be used where alternatives, such as ; retention/detention basins or storm sewers, are not practical or ~feasible. ~ . ~ If a drywell is used, the owner should notify Ecology and should ? place a warning next to the collection grate that says: Dump No .<r=~~ ~ Waste - Protect Your Groundwater. This stencil is available from ~ Ecology. :r,-,•'--r- 11 ' Ik 1". . Response to Letter No. 1(continued) . . 3. Any storm water run-off which exceeds the pre-developed flows and the 10- year storm will be collected on-site and disposed of through detention ponds to the existing Saltese drainage. The purpose of the detention ponds is not only to attenuate the discharge of each storm event, but also to allow for the placement of oil-water separators and treatment prior to storm water discharge to the Creek area as described in the DEIS. 4. As discussed on page 1 of the DEIS, an erosion control plan will be required prior to beginning construction. The erosion control plan will be prepared by a licensed engineer and will be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County f= Division of Engineering prior to construction. See also response to Letter No. 6, comment #2. ~ Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments ~:e:' ~ ti. „ ! •'.ii ` f James L. Manson February 29, 1996 Page 2 r'•: • .j After completion of this project, there is a likelihood that 3. stormwater runaff will contain increased levels of grease, oils, sediment, and other debris. It is recommended that stormwater treatment devices be installed so that any discharge will be appropriately treated to remove these substances. - When gasoline or oil are likely to be present, a coalescing plate oil/water separator should be used. Disposal of antifreeze into drywells is not acceptable. Drywells should not be used if acceptable disposal alternatives for oil and antifreeze are not readily available. A sedimentation and erosion control plan for the project site may 4 be required and must be developed by a licensed engineer. The plan must be implemented before and during construction. The site must be carefully monitored to determine effectiveness of the plan. The plan must be upgraded as necessary during the construction period. If you have any questions, please call Mr. Paul Turner with our Water Quality Program at (509) 625-5181 or Ms. Nancy Weller at ,{509) 625-5194. -Sincerely, ` A 1 r ~L J~'L C. f ' . ✓1~~ : '~i_. - • . ' Rebecca J.,Inman . . Environmental Review Section RI: 96-0713 , rM, cc: Linda Matlock, WQ : Heidi Renz, ERO . Paul Turner, ERO . ' Nancy Weller, ERO 1 " ~ . . L • _ i( . . a x y . . - .l. l . I •i`~,, Response to Letter No. 2 . Washington State Department of Ecology - Dennis Beich ! 1. As stated of page 20 of the DEIS, the proposed project includes planting native shrubs in the wetland buffer area within the project site as part of a native growth landscape plan. Since only 30 feet of the 50-foot wetland buffer is located on the project site, the project can only be responsible for mitigation only within this 30-foot area. The remaining approximately 20 feet of wetland buffer is located outside the project site on property owned by others. The ~ approved landscape plan will describe how the open space/wetland buffer area ~ will be delineated to prevent encroachment by adjacent lots. 2. The extension of Road "B" across Saltese Creek is not part of the proposed project. Impacts associated with the construction of this road will be analyzed if and when this extension is required to provide adequate access and traffic circulation to the adjacent property south of the project site. The responsibility for analysis of impacts and provision of mitigation.would be shared between the proponent of Turtle Creek and any future proponent for development of the property to the south. Future development of the property to the south that requires construction of this bridge will address impacts and mitigation in a cumulative fashion. ~ 3. A stormvvater management plan and final drainage plans will be prepared as part of the final plat process and is subject to review and approval by the - Spokane County Division of Engineering (see also responses to Letter No. 6, comments #1 and #3). Stormwater swales and detention facilities will not be located within wetland buffer areas, but open space areas can be utilized for stormwater management facilities. As a potential mitigation measure, the appropriate hearing body could also make the stormwater management plan . ~ subject to review by the Department of Ecology as a condition of approval. ~ ~ . Turtle Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments ' RECE!VED sPOKA► :oUrmLETTER 2 .t.-. NO. . F E 8 0 9 1996 _ . . y'=' DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING - STATE OF WASHINGTON - DEf'ARTMENT OF ECOLOGI' ' --l 4601 N. A1onroc, Sulte 202 ~ SNokanc, l1'ashin,gtvn 99205-1295 • t5091 4.56--2921) February 8, 1996 ' Mr. John Pederson . Spokane County Planning 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 ~ . ~ Dear Mr. Pederson: RE: Turtle Creek Thank you for the opportunity to review the DEIS for Turtle Creek preliminary plat. My July 27, 1994 letter to you regarding this preliminary plat, is still appropriate. Emphasis should be placed . on the fact that Ecology has agreed to the 50' buffer if fencing and an approved native landscape plan is in place. In addition, Ecology requests clarification on two issues: 1. In the proposed action alternative proposed Roaci "B" is shown crossing Saltese Creek. If 2 ~ this road construction is proposed in conjunction with this alternative, impacts associated with the construction of the road will have to be addressed. If the road crossing will not be constructed in conjunction with this application, but will be required at some future date, discussion regarding responsibility for mitigation should be included in the , discussion. : 2. The DEIS discusses several storm water options, but provides no information or 3 conceptual plans to respond to. At what point in the application will conceptual or ~ detailed stormwater management plan be offered for review? Of particular concern is .t location of stormwater swales and detention facilities outside buffer zones. : If you have any questions, contact me at 625-5192. Sincerely, . P• j!`,` c • 'T'~ Dennis Beich Wetlands Biologist , ~ DB:sb turtlecr.ltr . ~ . • ..t~...., ~.i . : gcr ~ . fi♦ r'• r. Response to Letter No. 3 Washington State Department of Transportation - Leonard Cash , 1. In August 1994 the development projects within the Barker Road corridor were much less well defined than they are today. Because the projects were relative(y unknown, the traffic study completed in 1994 was scoped by Spokane County Engineering to include a relatively high growth rate of 6%. The Barker Road Corridor Study (Appendix C of the DEIS) includes a more complete picture of the active projects in the area and therefore contains much more accurate information than the 1994 traffic study. The 1994 traffic study ~ proposed mitigation that, based upon more specific knowledge, is not required to mitigate impacts from development of the proposed project. The Barker Road Corridor Study and the supplemental information provided in the DEIS comply with the final scope of the DEIS (see Appendix A). The conditions of approval specified in the previously issued Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) no longer apply to the project because they were based on unspecific data. They were agreed to by the project proponent in order to facilitate project approval. Preparation of the Turtle Creek EIS (including the Barker Road Corridor Study) was completed using more specific data and identified 4ewer transportation-related impacts than previously identified in the 1994 study. The previously agreed upon nnitigation measures in the MDNS are not commensurate with the impacts of the proposed project. The mitigation proposed in the DEIS, as modified by the . information provided in Appendix B, will adequately mitigate the impacts caused by development of the Turtle Creek plat. See also response to Letter No. 4, comment #1. 2. See response to comment #1 above. The proponent of Turtle Creek will ~ mitigate its impacts on the surrounding transportation system as discussed in the DEIS and modified b the information rovided in A ~ Y p ppendix B. Appendix B of this FEIS contains additional technical information which f ~ supports the analysis presented in the DEIS. The information included in - Appendix 6 does not support the need for the Phase ll mitigation (installation of a signal at Barker Road and the eastbound 1-90 ramps) previously agreed to as part of the MDNS conditions. In addition, this improvement was made a ~ condition of the Morningside Heights plat, which has already received approval. Traffic generation from Turtle Creek does not justify the need for this improvement. . 3. See responses to comments #1 and #2 above. According to the State ~ Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments ` S .~F si w FA ;;~~/u4 ' ye ib:2~~~ 1 D~~.-4~L0*i EAS7EFr~d PEG 1 ur-i : 5~,~9-32~-6~~~~~~~-~ PAGE 1 . . . LETTER N0. 3. . 5 . WA8hf11gto11 St8t0 6ostern Repion Depairtment of TrBnsportation 2 j1< N. M3ylA~ qsSr~ 20~~ ~ S~ oK a C. WA 9. 7 C Sld Morrlson . • 5ecret9ry of 7tansportaiinn (509)32 4- NF .i i ; . March 4, 1996 ~AR, cti 5 ~Jli~JhNUW~~ PLMi~~NI.; Mr. 3ohn Pederson Spokane County Planning West 1026 Broadway Avenue ~ Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Re: fiurtle Creek Draft Environmental ~ Impact Statement Dear Mr. Pedorson: Thank you for the opportunity to review the above Draft Environmental lmpact Statement (DE1S): " After review of this DE1S the Washington State Department of Transportation has . the following comments regarding this study: . • Over the last 18 rnonths WSDOT has reviewed several traff c studies conducted for this ~ proposed devetopment by In{and Pacific Engineering. As a result of the August 1994 traffic analyais and the projected impacts to the Barker RoadlI•901nterchange a Mitigated Determination of Non Significance (NIDNS) was issued which the applicant and WSDQT . concurred with. In this agreement, the applicant agreed to design, fisnd, and construct a _ traffic signal at the Barker Road and eastbound I-90 ramp terminals. Due to these previously established thresholds regarding mitigation in the 1994 MDNS, and the fact that the project has not changed significantly, the same mitigating measures are , appropriate for traffic impacts to WSDOT facilities. This fact is recognized on Page 55 of the DEIS, as mitigation that could be required of the.Turtle Creek proposal. -~s • Attached to this DEIS as Appendix C we found attached a copy of the "Barker Road 2 Traffic Impact Anelysis and Comdor Study" which we have had several concerns with and , have not accepted this comdor analysis. -Hawever, WSDOT concurs with the mitigat'ton ~ on Page SS of the DEIS, provided the applicant agTees to design, fund, and construct a : tteffic signal along with the associeted improvements at the Barker Road and eastbound l- , , 90 ramp tctminals. ~ • If the applicant or lead agency desires to change the mitigating measures presented in this 3 DEIS we woutd ask that a Supplemental Draft EIS be routed to all affected agencies to ~ ~ensute the proposed changes could be revicwed prior to the issuance of a Final LIS. . ~ ib~ -F:• ".t-','~ ~ . • , • ;,r r. • , - Response to Letter No. 3 (continued) . Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), responses to comments received on the DEIS ~ and published in the FEIS are meant to "Supplement, improve or modify the analysis" and "Make factual corrections" (WAC 197-11-560(1)(c) and (d)1. These responses and the information provided in Appendix B make, factual corrections and modify the analysis provided in the previously issued DEIS, as required by SEPA. A Supplemental EIS is only required if there are "Substantial . changes so that the proposal is likely to have significant adverse environmental impacts," or "New information indicating a proposal's probable significant adverse environmental impacts" (WAC 197-11-600(4)(d)(i) and 001. Since neither of these conditions apply, preparation of a SuPPlemental Draft EIS is not ~ warranted at this time. r II - v ~ . ~ ~ Turtle Creek Fina/ ElS September 1996 Response to Comments r b.' . . V~.. •~.t...,-y L ~~3/~~a '96 i 6: 2C1 1D:<<JSDOT EASTERf•~ FEG i Or~~ FA X: : 5^9-32a-6~~C~5 PAGE .2 Mr. Pederson - March 4, 1996 . Page 2 If you have any questions regarding the above please feel free to contact Leonard Cash in our Rogional Planning Office at 324-6199. . Sincerely, L ~ LEONARD CASH, PE Regionat Planning Engineer . JCL LCC/gjf cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers ~ ! Y F9 J „ ~ , . ~ . . . , r~ , A ,a.a'! 'l,'~ ' •,ji R~: ' . ' .r• . .t9~' . . ` . ~ • .~'r , • ~ Response to Letter No. 4 Spokane County Division of Engineering - Pat Harper 1. The mitigation proposed under c.1 on page 53 of the DEIS addresses the concerns listed under Phase I. See aiso response to Letter No. 3, comment #1. Appendix B of this FEIS contains additional technical information which supports the analysis presented in the DE1S. The information included in Appendix B does not support the need for the Phase II mitigation (installation of a signal at Barker Road and the eastbound I-90 ramps) previously agreed to ~ as part of the MDNS conditions. In addition, this improvement was made a condition of the Morningside Heights plat, which has already received approval. Traffic generation from Turtle Creek does not justify the need for this improvement. ~ The existing traffic signal at Barker Road and Appleway could need future upgrading if levels of service fall below acceptable limits. The need for this improvement could be reviewed with final plat approval of Phase 2 or at the completion of the approximately 50th lot within the Turtle Creek plat. The proponent of Turtle Creek couid contribute a proportionate share to fund this improvement if it is found to be necessar,/ in the future. s- The existing safety concerns along Barker Road identified by County Engineers, as addressed in the Phase III mitigation in the MDNS, are fully recognized as part of the Turtle Creek EIS. The widening of Barker Road to 32 feet to accommodate non-motorized forms of transportation was also a condition of approval placed on the Morningside Heights plat, but is required only after the . connection is made between Barker Road and Chapman Road. Prior to this improvement being completed, the existing safety concerns along Barker Road j_. could be addressed by providing a separated pathway for non-motorized traffic*. ~ This pathway could be installed between 8th Avenue and Appleway and would continue the separated bikeway required as a condition of approval for the Morningside Heights plat that will extend from Morningside Heights to 8th Avenue. 'Ttaffic generation from Turtle Creek alone does not justify the need to widen Barker Road, other than to improve the existing safety conditions related to non-motorized forms of transportation. See also response to Letter No. 9, comment #24. ~ 2. The traffic analysis prepared and presented in Section 2.0 Transportation of the t DEIS took into account all the surrounding land uses, including schools. As outlined in the Final Scoping Notice (see Appendix A), the traffic analysis also included study of the Sprague Avenue and Appleway intersection. None of the Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 ' Response to Comments . ~.h'`~• • ~•f • ri.~~Ttl: ti{';"'~%.~ r .7 LETTER No : 4 MEMO TO: 3ohn Pederson, Senior Planner, Division of Building and Planning FROM: Pat Harper, Transportation Planning Supervisor, Spokane County Engineering . DATE: March 4, 1996 SUBJECT: Turtle Creek Draft EnvironmentaI Impact Statement ~ FILE: Turtle Creek Draft Environmental Impact Statement This project has been reviewed regarding its traffic impacts on several occasions. A Mitigated ~ Determination of Non-significance was issued on this same project and the applicant previously agreed to off-site mitigation which was the following conditions: Phase I. The applicant shall pave Long Road and build the pedestrian walkway in Phase I . of the proposal as delineated in the Preliminary Plat of Record. Phase II. The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at Barker Road and tile Eastbound (south) I-90 ramps. The applicant shall be responsible for design, funding and construction of the traffic signal along with improvements associated with the traffic . signal. The traffic signal and improvements shail meet WSDOT standards. The ' applicant shall place 10 % of the cost to upgrade the traffic signal at Barker Road and . Appleway in an escrow account managed by Spokane County for future upgrades to the signal at this intersection. ` Phase III The applicant shall submit plans for review and approval by the County Engineer for the improvement of Barker Road from Eighth Avenue to Appleway and _ construct to a width of 32 feet. The aforementioned MDNS conditions were attached based upon a traffic analysis for just Turtle Creek in a report submitted in August 1994. It would seem that this was an already established .o I parameter for this project and at a minimum this projects responsibilities would include these as ; mitigating measures. The need for widening of Barker Road was related to safety concerns regarding non-vehicular interaction with increased traffic generated by this proposal. On the 20th of December 1994 the Board of County Commissioners in a decision on this 2 proposal requested that one of the items to be addressed regarding traffic concerns by the Board was as follows: "4. The traffic study conducted by the applicant does not adequately address the impact a of the proposal on Long Road, including its intersections with Appleway and Sprague." - "The study fails to take into account school traffic that will be generated on Long Road during the school season, and fails to adequately analyze mitigating measures for the t - At • n k7 .a= . 7 „ ~ . ~ , . Response to Letter No. 4(continued) intersections along Long Road were scoped for inclusion in the traffic study d , because previous studies revealed that the intersection of Long Road and Sprague Avenue, which has more traffic on it than any other intersection along Long Road, was operating at level of service (LOS) A. LOS A is the best level of service available and implies no operational or safety-related problems. Since these intersections will continue to function at LOS A following build-out of Turtle Creek, no mitigation is required. Mitigation proposed for Long Road includes paving from 8th Avenue north to approximately 6th Avenue where the existing paving ends, as well as providing ~ a hard surface walking path for school children. These measures will ~ adequately mitigate the impacts that the development of Turtle Creek will have on Long Road. See also response to Letter No. 9, comment #60. ,3. Stand alone mitigation is provided on pages 55 and 56 of the DEIS, as modified by the information provided in Appendix B. See also responses to comments #1 and #2 above. ~ , Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments ,r• . :1~: ^"r•t: 1R~' . • `i 1,:1✓ . , ; . problem intersections on Long Road." =Since this was an issue of Board concern in the original submittal it should be also addressed r.. specifically in this environmental document. As was addressed in the Morningside Heights Draft EIS Spokane County Engineering would not 3 . . at this time recornmend the formation of a Traffic Mitigation Impact Area. These Impact A.reas must be formed by the Board of County Conunissioners as was done in the Liberty Lake area. In the case of Liberty Lake approvals of both land uses and plats had been done over a period . beginning in 1977 until present and approvals of building permits were contingent upon a coming together of alI parties within the area. This is not the case with Turtle Creek, Morningside Heights, Meadowview Ranch Estates, these are all still subject to the land use - process. Calculations for mitigation fees must be based upon known projects that have received ~ at least preliminary approval. Therefore any reference to use of Mitigation Impact Area for this project is only for discussion purposes and this projects' mitigation is directly related to • improvements required based on impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this Draft EIS. ~ I I . I .r ~L: ' dC'i , • ~ ` !,C . , y' . . . r . . , • ' _r-. -Response to Letter No. 5 : Spokane County Division of Utilities - Jim Legat r 1. Discussion regarding the Sewer Connection Agreement is included on page 73 of the DEtS. On May 23, 1996 the County Division of Engineering proposed to increase the size of the Long Road sewer from 8-inches to 18-inches in diameter and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). The DNS was appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, who upheld the appeai at a public hearing held on July 9, 1996 and withdrew the DNS. A request for ~ reconsideration of the 6oard's decision was denied on August 27, 1996. 2. Additional information regarding sewer issues and corrections to the DEIS are . provided in Appendix C(see Inland Pacific Engineering, lnc. letter dated March 4, 1996). The County Division of Utifities has determined that the capacity of the 8-inch sewer line in Long Road as currently designed is 700 single-family dwelling units (see Appendix C letter dated May 29, 1996 from County Uti{ities Division). The following summarizes the approved and proposed sewer commitments in the area that may need to utilize the Long Road sewer: 174 units - fronting iots, Meadowview Ranch Estates, and Viewmont at Morningside (apprcvzd plats); 39 units - Phase II at Morningside (approved plat); 257 units - Morningside Heights (approved by the County Fiearing Examiner); 101 units - Turtle Creek (proposed plat) " 571 units - Potentially committed. Assuming all the above projects are approved and developed as proposed, a total of 129 units of capacity (700 units total capacity minus 571 units potentially committed) would remain available for use after development of the ~ Turtle Creek plat. It must be noted that this capacity limitation is based on gravity service only. For example, only about three-fifths of the Turtle Creek site can be served solely via gravity. The remaining lots, below the elevations for gravity service, could pump up to the gravity lines or flow to a proposed pump station located south of the Saltese Creek at Long Road extended. The pump station would include a peaking chamber which would allow it to cycle and pump sewage during off peak gravity periods, thereby not conflicting with the gravity peak flows. If mutualfy agreed upon measures are taken in the ' future to adjust the capacity limitation (i.e. equalizing peak flows); the County may adjust the limitation on the number of connections into this sewer. The County Division of Utilities is responsible for approval of sewer facilities and for final determination of whether or not capacity exists to handle the proposed : Turtle Creek Frna! E!S September 1996 Response to Comments ':;e. •:p' ~ 4 • e, h y LETTER NO. 5 . ; M E M 0 R A N D U M DATE: March 4, 1996 _ TO: John Pederson, Dept. of Building a d PI ning FROM: James A. Legat, Utilities Division RE: Draft EIS, Turtle Creek Prelimina Pla P7 The developer of this project is proposing to connect to a public sanitary sewer ~ line to be constructed in Long Rd. befinreen 2nd Ave. and 8th Ave.. In an . agreement between the County, Richard Dahm, and Clara Hepton, the developers would be allowed to construct the Long Road sewer line to only 8" diameter. This agreement stipulates specific properties, including ownership by Mr. Dahm, for which the capacity of the pipe has been reserved. Because this line is not sized to receive anticipated sewage flows from the entire 2 . drainage area, an engineering report has been requested of the developers `engineer to determine 1.) what the capacity of the proposed sewer in Long Rd. is in terms of dwelling units, and 2.) how much of that capacity is already reserved and what capacity is left for subsequent projects, including Turtle Creek. The quantity ranges discussed in paragraph 3, Pg. 72 of the Draft EIS need to reflect a single calculated quantity. The flow calculations need to be based on the flow paramenters approved by Spokane County Utilities Division. ~ In addition to capacity limitations in the 8" sewer pipe to be built in Long Rd., 3 there is also the issue of available capacity for the project at the Spokane ' Regional Treatment Plant. This issue may also result in a limitation of the ~ number of units allowed to connect to the public sewer system in the future. , RECEIVED SPWNE COUNTY r~ MAR 0 4 1996 D'IVIBfON OF BUILOHVG q1Vp pLANNINQ 8Y ~ , Response to Letter No. 5(continued) . use. .3. At the present time and with information provided by Spokane County through the County Sewer Stakeholder process, there is avaiiable capacity for the effluent from this development within the capacity requirements of the Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant. Discussion regarding this issue from the Morningside Heights DEIS is incorporated by reference into the Turtle Creek DEIS, as stated on pages 72 and 73 of the Turtle Creek DEIS. The appropriate hearing body could condition the project by restricting the number of lots approved for development if treatment plant capacity becomes a limiting factor ~ in the future. ~J ~ Turtle Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments alnv . •`i•'. 9` C.j' : y3' r ~ LETTER NO. 6. % S P O K A N E f~''_, ~►~T C O U N T Y . DIVISION OF ENGINEERIhG AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME\'T , William A. johns, P.E., Countv Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Memorandum Date: March 4, 1996 To: Division of Building and Planning (John Pederson) ~ From: Development Services (Ed Parry, P.E.0 . Subject: P1753 - Turtle Creek = Draft EIS Review l. The stormwater management portion of this document acknowledges ~ that development will increase the volume of stormwater discharged to Saltese Creek. The stonn drainage concept intends to mitigate this impact by utilizing 11208" swales designed for the 10-year event; impacts at more severe events would not be controlled. Overflows of 208 swales would end up at Saltese Creek. -2. This project has several items of concern: - a. The proposed Road "B" crossing of the Saltese Creek 2 Floodplain; b. Steep slopes between the lots and the creek, and on the °Zots themselves; c. Silty soils in the vicinity of the lots proposed at the ~ southeast corner of the site. ~3. From a stormwater management perspective, the applicant needs 3 to. ~ A. Address the discharge of apparently uncontrolled runoff ~ from the southerly end of Road "B", near the crossing of Saltese Creek. B. Provide an erosion prevention/sediment control plan for both the infrastructure and lot development phases of this proj ect . C. Coordinate the drainage concept with the State Department of Wildlife for discharges to the wetland areas. s D. Contact the County Floodplain Administrator to determine what measures, if any, may be needed to mitigate impacts to the ~ floodplain. . : , . A 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . . • ; , • :e. . ` Response to Letter No. 6 Spokane County Division of Engineering - Ed Parry AJ 1. General discussions regarding stormwater impacts and mitigation are provided in Sections 1.1 and 3. 1 of the DEIS as they relate to impacts on soils and surface water quality/quantity. Stormwater was not specifically identified during the scoping process for inc{usion in the DEIS (see Final Scoping Notice in Appendix A). . ~ Potential impacts can be mitigated by using state-of-practice or good engineering design methods and best management practices (BMPs), which are generally addressed in the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Manaaement and the Spokane County Code. The project proponent wili utilize these ~or other state-of-practice and best management practices to mitigate potential adverse drainage and erosion impacts resulting from development of . the proposed project. - All stormwater run-off from this plat will be treated in accordance with the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Manaaement regarding the pre- treatment of discharge waters in infiltration ponds prior to direct discharge via drywells or other means. See also respc,nse to Letter No. 1, comment #3. ~ 0 Since potential impacts can only b2 fully identified based on final plat design, specific mitigation will be addressed as part of the stormwater management , plan that must be prepared and approved by the County Division of Engineering. The County Division of Engineering also has authority for approval of the final drainage plans, which must be completed along with road and utility plans as part of final plat approval. 2. See response to Letter No. 2, comment #2 and response to comment #1 above. ~ The road crossing over the Saltese Creek floodplain is anticipated to be elevated five to ten feet above the actual 100-year flood elevations within the area. The project will obtain all necessary floodplain permits if and when they are required. The presence of silty soils at the southeastern corner of the site is identified in Section 1. 1 Soils and on page 19 of the DEIS. The areas with silty soils may not be suitable for storm water discharge other than to support a future detention pond, however they are suitable for development of the proposed lots and single-family dwelling units. . 3. See response to Letter No. 1, comment #3. Erosion and sedimentation control measures will be incorporated into the final plat process. As stated on page 1 of the DEIS, "An erosion control and grading plan will be prepared and Turtle Creek Fina1 ElS September 1996 Response to Comments . ~ Response to Letter No. 6(continued) implemented prior to site construction and may include techniques such as straw bales and netting to protect slopes and associated drainageways during `construction. A master stormwater management plan outlining sediment basins and retention ponds will include identification of inethods and maintenance for • stormwater drainage control." The required measures will be dependent upon the time of year, weather conditions, and specific locational factors for the particular phase under construction. . Coordination with the State Department of Ecology regarding wetland issues L, and the County Floodplain Administrator will take place during preparation of ~ the stormwater management plan that is required prior to final plat approval. See also responses to Letters No. 2 and No. 7 and response to comment #1 above. ~ ~ Turt/e Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments .D < i . x•; " LETTER NO. 7 ,k ~ , . . . _ S P O K A N E , C O U N T Y , OFF7CE OF THE COUN7Y ENGINEER ' • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMEN"T . ~i . Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Memorandum DATE: March 4, 1996 , - TO: John Pederson ~ FROM: Tammie Williams` RE: Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat - DEIS Comments The proposed plat is impacted by a Special Flood Hazard Area as identified by the Flood 1 : Insurance Rate Maps. All work must conform to the requirement of the National Flood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spokane County Code. A Floodplain Development Permit will be required from this office prior to work taking place on any property a portion ot' - which is in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. General requirements for development in or around thiS floodplain will include: • No impact to the 100 year base flood elevation due to work in or around the floodplain. If 2 work is proposed in the floodplain (filling, grading, structures, etc.) a floodplain analysis • and plans must be completed by an engineer licensed in the State of Washington to show no impact to the floodplain. This analysis and plans must be accepted by this office prior to issuance of a Floodplain Development Permit. • No increase in storm runoff may be discharged to the 100 year floodplain due to 3 development of the site. ' I • No lots may be created which are wholly within the identified 100 year floodplain. Each loc 4 ~ must have a suitable site for building outside the floodplain. • All structures must be elevated to have lowest floor including basement floor at least 1 foot 5 above the base flood elevation established on the current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. • Plans show a crossing structure over the identified floodplain. This structure must be 6 designed to span the 100 year floodplain without impacting the base 100 year flood elevation. A detailed floodplain analysis and plans completed by an engineer licensed in the State of Washington must be prepared to show no impact to the floodplain. This analysis and plans must be accepted by this office prior to issuance of a Floodplain Development Permit. _ tti'.1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456-4715 ' ' . . . '.T7 • I r . v ^ . t ' Response to Letter No. 7 Spokane County Division of Engineering - Tammie Wiiliams 0 1. As discussed on page 17 of the DEIS, the Saltese Creek drainage channel lies within the 100-year flood plain. According to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps, base flood elevations range from 2035 on the west end of the site to 2037 at the east end of the site near the Barker Road bridge crossing. The proposed lots are not located within the Special Flood Hazard Area. Prior to final plat approval, the project will verify they need for a floodplain permit and will comply with floodplain permit requirements if necessary. ~ 2. No filling, grading, or structures are proposed within the 100-year floodplain. 3. As discussed on page 19 of the DEIS, stormwater volumes in excess of current undeveloped site volumes will be managed on-site according to the County's "208" drainage requirements outlined in the Guidelines for Stormwater ManaQement. These guidelines stipulate that off-site flow under developed conditions must be detained and released at the same rate as under pre- developed conditions. 4. As stated above in response to comment r 1, no portions of the proposed lots are located within the 100-year floodplain. 5. There is a difference in elevation of approximately 10 feet between the base flood elevations discussed above in response to comment #1 and the proposed . lots. Therefore the basements of the housing structures would be separated from the base flood elevations by much more than the required one foot minimum. fi. The road crossing over Saltese Creek is not a part of the proposed project. See ~ response to Letter No. 2, comment #2. ;,:5 • Turt/e Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments • ',~Ja' ~'"1.!r.i~~'r;"-"i. •rej~ LETTER NO. 8 5091928-5 777 DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC. Fax 5091926-4690 12720 E. Nora AveRUe, Suite D Spokane, WA 99216 '~•Y RECEiVEQ SPOKANE Cot~NTv . March 1, 1996 MAR P 4 4"'~'=~ Mr. John Pederson Spokane County Building and Planning OfNM OF r7UILDiNG A;:~ . F--7 1026 West Broadway Avenue . Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Comments on Turtle Creek Draft Environmental Impact Statement Dear John: , 1 am writing to comment on the need for "voluntary " mitigation fees as requested by Central ' Valley School District regarding this project. The District recently passed a bond issue which will fund construction of a new elemetitary ~ school near Liberty Lake. This will eliminate the overcrowding at Greenacres Elementary, ,makc'ng the requested mitigation fees unnecessary. , 77te requested "volun.tary " mitigation fees are in no way voluntary if they are made a condition of preliminary plat approval. In addition, Mead School District recently dropped their request for such agreements since their attorney determined that such negotiated "voluntary " agreements would not stand up to a legal challenge. + Given the above and the fact that there is no legal justification for requiring "voluntary" fee agreements, I am requesting that Central Valley School District withdraw their request for ~ mitigation fees. Sincerely, M DEVELOPMENT, INC. ~ • E . ; j • f'! ~ _ ~ . , . ~ ~ . ~d ' -J "'.Richard T.. Dahm cc: Patti Tdolf - Ram Associates, Inc. Rick Dullanty - Witherspoon Kelley r' •t. - , t •P : ~ ` :Y ' I.t'+ :,L . Response to Letter No. 8 : Dahm Development, Inc. - Richard Dahm 1. Pursuant to Washington state law (58.17.110), proposed plats and subdivisions . r.equire adequate provision of infrastructure for approval. At the public hearing for the project, both proponents and opponents will have equal opportunity to present facts, provide comments, or object to specific conditions prior to a decision subject to the adopted policies and regulations. The hearing body is responsible for determining the applicability of 58.17.110 and the appropriate ~ level of service required for the proposed project. ~ . Turt/e Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments , - ;r'~M:%ry" ' , . S . Lati+, Offices LETTER NO. 9 - Eugster Haskell Professionol Service Corporation Stcphen K. Eugster . - • Stc hcn }~iaskell Telephone (509) 624-5566 Christopher N.I. Grlmes Facsimile (509) 838-4274 March 4, 1996 RECEIVED SPOKAIVE COUNTY ~ MaR 0 4 1996 . DiVlSION OF BUILDiNfl /WD PtAtlUCNO BY. Spokane County ~ f v Division. of Building and Planning - West 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 Re: Draft Environmental Impact Statement ' Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat To Whom It May Concern: We have been retained by the Micaview Landowners Association (Micaview) to represent it in land use issues impacting the area where its members reside and own property. Our client has reviewed the Draft Environmental Impact Statement prepared by Ramm Associates for the Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat (94-033B). It finds that it contains numerous statement with which it disagrees and/or which require additional information ~ and study. The comments of my client are as follows they are presented in sequence as they appear ~ in the EIS. Page S-1 Project Summary - Objectives Micaview disagrees with the statement that the proposal will "develop a residential community that is compatible with surrounding neighborhoods." The Draft EIS itself ~ .c indicates at page S-2 that this proposal is incompatible with all surrounding neighborhoods r except the platted but largely undeveloped 14 acre Meadowview Ranch Estates directly to , ~ the east. The EIS neglects to mention that since this plat was approved in 1991 several other requests for similar density developments in the immediate area have been denied. . 100 Minncsota Building • 423 West First Avenue • Spokane, Washington 99204-0206 _e . . ...`p ~Y-••-E aqy ; ~ . -~,r - ~ Response to Letter No. 9 Eugster Haskell - Stephen K. Eugster 1. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) states that "An EIS shall provide impartiai discussion of significant environmental impacts and shail inform , decision-makers and the public of reasonable alternatives, including mitigation measures, that would avoid or minimiie adverse impacts or enhance environmental quality" (WAC 197-11-400(2)). WAC 197-11-440(4) states that "The summary shall briefly state the proposal's objectives, specifying the - purpose and need to which the proposal is responding. An analysis of ' whether or not the proposed action completefy satisfies the stated objectives is outside the scope of the EIS (see also response to comment #51 below). 2. The project site is in. the Urban category of the County's Comprehensive Plan and is currently zoned Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"citylike" environment which includes various land uses, intensive residential development, and public facilities and services (water, sanitary and storm sewer lines, police and fire protection, and other features). The definition of "fill-in" is subjective in nature in regards to the context of the terms "area" and "vicinity" and is subject to interpretation by the appropriate hearing body. See also re*sponse to #44 ; below. 3. The comment does not specify what "major unmitigated off-site impacts" are of concern. The DEIS does . not state that al1 impacts will be completely mitigated. Unavoidable impacts are disclosed and discussed throughout the DEIS in regards to the change in land use, increased population in the area requiring additiona{ public services, increased traffic, etc. The phased development of these types of residential projects is the central element that allows for appropriate mitigation to occur concurrently with build-out. Appropriate mitigation is determined by agencies with jurisdiction and will be provided by the project proponent as discussed in the DEIS. 4. The comment is subjective in nature since no documentation or statistical anaiysis is provided to support the stated conclusion. See also response to Letter No. 10, comment #4. 5. Opinion noted. As discussed above in the response to comment #1, the scope . of the EIS does not include whether or not the proposed action comp{etely satisfies the stated objectives. In addition, analysis of impacts related to aesthetic considerations is not a required part of. the DElS as it was not identified during the scoping process. Any discussion of aesthetics unavoidably Turtle Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments rs-•.'~.r~ • Y,ifyrt~•. • • •r Spakane County Division of Building and Planning , March 4, 1996 Page 2 h Micaview disagrees that the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This .2 ~ development does not meet the definition of fill-in development within the meaning of the Comprehensive Plan. This development is the type of spot urban sprawl the Comprehensive Plan ~ defines as undesirable. Micaview disagrees that the proposal will "minimize off-site impacts caused by project 3 • development." Approval of this project will have major unmitigated off-site impacts. ~ Micaview disagrees that this develo ment is needed to meet market demand in the area. Other p 4 already approved developments to the east, north and west are more than sufficient to meet the demand in this area for the next 10 plus years. 6. Micaview disagrees that the proposal will "Provide an aesthetically pleasing environment in an 5 effort to enhance adjacent land uses." This proposal continues the sprawl of urban housing onto . rural agriculturallands. It will have an immediate and negative impact on existing adjacent land uses. ~ ~ Page S-2 Project Summary - Proposed Action _ :The draft EIS makes many references to open spaces b-ing used for "passive recreational 6 purposes. Micaview would like this term defined. What are passive recreational purposes. -The Draft EIS incorrectly indicates that 8th Avenue wilt provide east and west access to the plat. 7 Eight Avenue lies north of the plat. There is no east or west access. P-age S-2 & S-3, Reasonable Alternatives 1.0 Lower Density Alternative , Micaview disagees that the one acre per lot option is not consistent with existing zoning of the $ ~ site and surrounding area. The comprehensive plan defines urban lot sizes as ranging from 1 to 17 units per acres. Micaview questions the proponents statement that sewering would not be cost-effective. The 9 proponent has been granted approval to run an 8-inch sewer main down 8th Avenue directly in front of the proposed plat to provide sewer service to another development. Based on information supplied to the public during a series of "Sewer Meetings" on the cost of "new . technology" septic systems it is difficult to believe that with the sewer line already in place the : cost to bring sewer onto the individuallots would be cost prohibitive. Micaview objects to the inclusion of the proponents subjective statements relative to formation of 10 a homeowners association and or restrictive covenants. There is absolutely no reason to believe 1 that a homeowners association would not be formed or that the'wetland areas along Saltese Creek would be afforded less protection because less homes and thus less people would be involved. ' • 'v- .,•'y ' •~.sA: ti Response to Letter No. 9(continued) d:. includes many value judgements, therefore the inherent subjectivity of the issue must be kept in mind. The proposal's objectives are summarized on page S-1 of the DEIS. 6. Passive recreational purposes are terms used to define uses and activities that do not require formal improvements. In the case of the Turtle Creek project, this may include walking and activities such as bird watching within the open - space areas along Saltese Creek. A trail is not proposed for development as part of the project, but is an option that could be pursued by the homeowner's ~ association. 7. Residents of Turtle Creek would utiliie 8th Avenue to travel east or west of the project site. As discussed on page 65 of the DEIS, access is provided to 8th Avenue at two points along the northern site boundary. 8. Opinion noted. Both the proposed project and development of one-acre lots would be consistent with the density range suggested by the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. 9. Sewering costs are discussed on pages 6 and 8 of the DEIS. 10. The Lower Density alternative is outlined on page 6 of the DEIS. It is discussed in order "to permit a comparative evaluation of the alternatives, including the proposed action," as required by the State Environmental Policy Act Rules (WAC 197-911-440(5)(c)(v)). This section of SEPA also states that "one alternative (including the proposed action) may be used as a benchmark for comparing alternatives." Section vi of SEPA states that "A range of alternatives or a few representative alternatives, rather than every possible reasonable variation, may be discussed." ~ In order to make a comparative analysis, several assumptions had to be made to reasonably define the Lower Density alternative. It is not presented by the project proponent as a desirable option but is defined by County staff as a reasonable scenario for development of the site without the elements proposed as part of the current action. It is possible that the site could be developed with open space, a developed park, a homeowners association, and/or restrictive covenants. A discussion of the futl range of reasonable development possibilities and variations is not required or desired by SEPA, but SEPA does provide for flexibility in defining alternatives. The Lower Density alternative does not totally exclude these elements but addresses the possibility that they may not be included in future -development proposals. The Lower Density Alternative was defined as presented in the DEIS for discussion purposes and Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments . yf~ h. , . • .ry~,~. P. Spokane County Division of Building and Planning _ March 4, 1996 Page 3 . Logically the opposite is true. If less homes are build there are less humans around to adversely . impact the environment. " Page S-3 through S-6 Natural Environment 1.0 Earth ~ ~ The EIS should be expanded to include the fact that a11 of this land is irrigated and is therefore 11 ~ clearly prime agicultural land under NRCS criteria. It should also clearly indicate that this property is being actively farmed and has been activel}r farmed for well over 40 years with a variety of crops. Current crops include alfalfa and grain. . . ~ ..While introduction of this urban development might not "preclude agricultural use" of adjacent 12 lands it will definitely impact it negatively by introducing more urban use and therefore more , people into the area. 2.0 Air - IViicaview questions the proponents statement that there are no significant long term air quality 13 _ r: impacts either on or off-site. No studies have been doile to deterntine this fact. The introduction of approximately 1,000 additional vehicle trips will have an impact. The fact that SRTC did not . : respond to a scoping request does not imply there are no impacts. Relia.nce on the air quality : findings at an unrelated intersection are unacceptable under the requirements of both the Federal and Washington State Clean Air Acts. Air Quality studies are required any time an intersection is at or expect to go below LOS level C. The EIS clearly shows this to be the case therefor Air Quality studies are required before a final EIS can be issued. - The EIS states that this project would reduce PM101evels by eliminating agricultural activities 14 ~ (plowing) and unpaved roads (8th Avenue). The EIS fails to indicate that the vast majority of the ~ project site is in alfalfa which is a perennial crop that is not plowed and that through years of - oiling over half of the unpaved section of 8th avenue has a pavement like surface that currently generate no more dust that a paved road. The increased traffic associated with an urban development not to mention the wood smoke from fireplaces will more than offset any decrease in PM10. The traffic associated with the project will clearly increase the CO generated. 3.0 Wkter ; ~ . . ~ , Micaview disagrees with the indication that introduction of urban housing on this site will actually 1~'j improve water quality of Saltese Creek and enhance the wetland associated with it. The amount of fertilizers and pestlcontrol used will be no less and in fact probably more given the current crop grown on this site. In addition humans, over 200 of them in this case, bring a11 types of addition contaminates with them as indicated on page 18 and cover a good proportion of the land with - I . V P • • 9 F'T ^ 4.1 9'= 3 O • _ ~ Response to Letter No. 9(continued) ~ in order to present a comparative analysis of the proposed action. `v Restrictive covenants are frequently applied to new residential developments to provide consistency of design, style, and pleasing color schemes. They also , stipulate use and maintenance of common areas by residents and domestic . pets. 11. Page 13 of the DEIS states that approximately 25 of the 39 acres are cultivated farmland with soils designated as prime farmla.nd. Page 38 of the DEIS describes the types of crops grown on-site. 12. Impacts caused by the proposed change in land use from agricultural to single- family residential are discussed on pages 13, 14, 41, and 42 of the DEIS. In ' addition, the project site and surrounding area is designated Urban by the County Comprehensive Plan, which indicates that urban services are appropriate for the area. 13. No comments regarding air quality issues were received during the DEIS comment period from the agencies of jurisdiction. The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) previously indicated that, based on the 1994 traffic study, projected traffic volumes from development of Turtle Creek are too small to require an air quality analysis (see attached letter dated August 30, 1994). The SRTC was contacted again by phone and letter (see attached letter dated October 3, 1995) regarding the Morningside Heights and Turtle Creek projects prior to issuance of the DEIS. A request for scoping of an air quality study was made but no scope was supplied prior to issuance of the DEIS, nor were comments. received -regarding air quality in response to the DEIS. Therefore the air quality section of the DEIS is adequate to address any concerns with regard to air quality. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) states that "Lack of comment by other agencies or members of the public on ~ environmental documents, within the time periods specified by these rules, shall be construed as lack of objection to the environmental analysis. (WAC 197- 11-545(2)). 14. The DEIS addresses the proposed change in land use from production of agricultural crops to the proposed plat desig'n. Current use of the property does not dictate its long range use, therefore it would not be appropriate for the EIS analysis to assume that the site will always be planted in alfalfa and will not be plowed. Some portions of 8th Avenue have been oiled as the comment indicates, however, again, it cannot be assumed that this practice will continue indefinitely nor does it apply to all of 8th Avenue that would be impacted by the proposed project between Barker Road and Long Road. See also response to , Turtle Creek Fina/ ElS September 1996 Response to Comments rr~, a .Fy . ,{~•r.,o i` . Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 Page 4 impervious surfaces increasing run offand potential contamination of the creek. Micaview - recognizes that stormwater practices required by the county attempt to mitigate as much as 15 -possible the negative impacts of humans on the environment. However to imply as this EIS does that urban sprawl is actually good for the environment is ludicrous. . Page S-6 through 5-13 Built Environment ' 1.0 Land Use ~ The first goal of the Comprehensive Plan is to conserve productive agricultural land for 16 ' agriculture. This goal does not specify any land use category. The goal to conserve productive . agricultural land in semi-rural and rural lifestyle areas is a separate independent goal. A.s stated before Micaview disagrees with the proponents statement that this project complies will all the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. -Micaview disagrees with the proponents statement that this site is located on the fringe of a 17 ~developing area that is transition to urban land use. Clearly the proponent wishes to make this a -true statement however, a simple drive through this area, and for that matter a review of the proponents own map (figure 30 in appendix C), clearly shows that without the proposed Turtle ;Creek and Meadow View Terrace subdivisions this area will retain its current semi- . . ' .-ruraUagricultural character. Current land use in the area provides a very nice transition with more ..dense commercial and urban development to the north along the I-90/Appleway corridor, Aransitioning through larger lots to the current agricultural use of the project site and areas to the -south. The EIS itself indicates that this proposal would be more intense than existing land uses in any direct north, west , south or east except for a small 14 acre Meadovwiew Ranch Estates that was subdivided into 35 lots in 1991 but has yet to be fully developed (--a total of 6 homes ; currently exist.). I . Micaview disagrees that approval of this development would not be a rima factor contributin ~ P rY g 1$ to growth in the area. The EIS makes repetitive references to the "already approved Meadowview Ranch Estates" to justify the TuRle Creek proposal as being consistent with existing ~ land use. There is no reference to other more recent projects of the similar density that were denied. Nor does the EIS.-mention the fact that Pheasant Park was approved only after it's density was reduced to 1 acre parcels. If the existance of one, 14 acre 35 lot subdivision in what is otherwise a suburban area with most 19 lots in the 3 to 10 acre range is justification for the Turtle Creek proposal then the inducement to growth that it's approval represents is tremendous particularly in view of the fact that the same . people own srgnificant amounts of land to the south. , 2.0 Transportation i e ~ w' Response to Letter No. 9(continued) ( r" comment #13 above regarding air quality impacts. h'•- _ :r 15. The DEIS does not indicate in any way that "sprawl is good for the environment" as indicated by the comment. According to the State Department of Ecology, wetland buffers that are improved and enhanced with additional plantings of native vegetation and decreasing the sedimentation and nutrient jloading of Saltese Creek would improve its water quality. See also response to ~comment #33 below. ~ 16. In its introduction the County Comprehensive Plan indicates that the listed goals ~ and objectives were "melded" together and are repeated "under appropriate chapters in the body of the text." The Comprehensive Plan does not indicate f that all the listed goals are specifically applicable to each land use designation. As discussed on page 28 of the DEIS, the Urban ca-Legory contains no specific goals, objectives, or decision guidelines (policies) for retention of agricultural properties. Preservation of agricultural land is achieved under the Rural and Semi-Rural designations that affect lands south and east of the project site. The Comprehensive Plan clearly identifies that the goal of preserving agricultural land is appropriate and can be achieved on properties designated as Semi-Rural ~ Plus, Agriculture, and Rural located throughout the County. See-also response to comment #44 below. i 17. Comments noted. Pages 41 and 42 of the DEIS discuss the proposed project's relationship with adjacent land uses. From a regional perspective of many square miles, "the project site is located along the fringe of a transition area ~ between -higher- density urban areas to the north and west and lower density j semi-rural areas to the south and east (page 41 of the DEIS). This discussion relates to the Comprehensive Plan map (Figure 6 of the DEIS) which illustrates the overall transition of land uses from the mostly urban Valley floor (i.e., ~ Sprague Avenue and Sullivan Road) to the mostly rural Saltese Flats area (i.e., Barker Road and 32nd Avenue). ; ~ The DEIS states that the level of development proposed is more intensive than existing land uses to the north, south, and. west (pages S-7 and 41). In addition, on page 41 the DElS states "Because the project is located in this fringe area, it can be expected to be consistent with some adjacent land uses and not with others." 18. The DEIS references the existence of other plats that are approved in the area but does not use them as a rational basis for support of the proposed project. See also response to comment #17 above. . Turt/e Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments r, .~r .-.Y ~ -F ,xk -i f . Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 . Page 5 Based on statement made elsewhere in the EIS the build out of Turtle Creek is anticipated to be 3 -20 . to 5 years. Therefore a 5 year rather than a 3 years period should be used in the traffic analysis. Micaview questions the 5% figure used as traffic anticipated to utilize Long Road in the AM. 21 This is inconsistent with the experience of current residents living on 8th Avenue at the current time. . Micaview questions the road impact of the no-action alternative. What development is 22 ~ anticipated under this scenario to change the LOS level from C to E? The EIS needs to clarify statement in this section. _ Micaview disagrees with the statement that Turtle Creek by itself would not require any 23 mitigation at area intersections. This is inconsistent with statements made elsewhere in the EIS. ' Turtle Creek will add over 1,000 vehicle trips to area roads many of which are approaching unacceptable levels. Current regulation require that adequate provision be made for roads and other transportation needs before a subdivision can be approved. If roads are currently inadequate then this development can not be approved unless they can be improved to acceptable levels. The question of who or what caused the roads to be inadequate is not the issue. They ,must be improved to acceptable levels or the development can not be approved. For Turtle Creek to pay a"proportionate" share of costs is an acceptable alternative only if the rest of the funds .necessary can be collected and the roads✓intersections improve concurrent with the build out of Turtle Creek. To comply with current laws provision of services must be concurrent with .development. At no point in this summary of transportation impacts is the widening of Barker road to the 4 24 lanes required for a principle arterial designation addressed. The need io widen Barker was identified in previous docuinents addressing the Turtle Creek development. This requirement has not gone away and the broader view taken by this study would simply indicate that more ~ improvement than initially indicated are needed. 3.0 PubIic Services and Utilities . The narrative provided clearly indicates that existing schools, parks and police protective services 25 are inadequate to support the introduction of 101 new homes in this area. The proponent has not provided mitigation that will correct these inadequacies concurrent with the proposed development. Absolutely no provision is made to correct the already substantial deficits in neighborhood and community parks. As indicated elsewhere in the EIS the mitigation fee ~ . proposed for the school district is not sufficient to cover the increased costs. The increased , property tax revenues will not cover the increased long term costs associated with the necessity to provide services to an area where they are not currently available. I r •r; - . ' . ~ X: , . •1~ Response to Letter No. 9(continued) 19. The project site and surrounding area is designated Urban by the County -Comprehensive Plan, which indicates that urban services are appropriate for the area. 20. Residential plats within Spokane -County regularly develop 30 to 40 lots per year, therefore a three year build-out is reasonable is assume in the traffic analysis for Turtle Creek. The proposed phasing schedule is an estimate only and is not binding on ihe project unless specifically conditioned by the hearing . body. The three year build-out assumed in the traffic study analyzes the worst case scenario in regards to potential impacts and is not an issue with the ~ County Division of Engineering or the State Department of Transportation. . 21. The comment does not provide specific information or expertise in traffic analyses- regarding trip assignments. The estimated percentage used in the traffic study is not an issue with the County Division of Engineering or the State Department of Transportation. 22. Analysis of the No-Action alternative includes the projects in the surrounding area as discussed on pages 52 and 53 of the DEIS. 23. The analysis of impacts and required mitigation measures presented in the EIS for Turtle Creek is based upon practices and information currently available. It demonstrates that with the improvements proposed in the DEIS and modified by the information provided in Appendix B, the existing transportation system can safely accommodate the traffic from the development of Turtle Creek. See also responses to Letter No. 4, comment #1 and comments #25 and #51 below. ► 24. Four lanes are required to accommodate traffic volumes over 20,000+ vehicles . per day. Barker Road is not expected to have 20,000 vehicles per day ~ following full build-out of the Turtle Creek plat. The issue of widening Barker Road was addressed in the 1994 traffic study to the extent that there was a recognized need to accommodate non-motorized forms of transportation. At no time was there a condition proposed requiring Turtle Creek to widen Barker Road to accommodate four traffic lanes. Based on current development trends, Barker Road is expected to remain a two-lane facility and to operate acceptably for years to come. The DEIS indicates that impacts due to development of the proposed project are not substantial enough by themselves to require mitigation along Barker Road. See also response to Letter No. 4, comment 41. 25. Proposed development projects are not required to provide mitigation for existing deficiencies, but to reduce impacts caused by the proposed project. Turt/e Creek Final ElS Septembei 1996 Response to Comments , _ . e t: • • . Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 Page 6 This site is served by Greenacres Elementary and Greenacres Junior High. Greenacres Elementary 26 School is currently housing more students than its maximum design capacity. Every grade level is filled to capacity and students are being bussed to other schools. This has been the situation for the last several years. Greenacres Junior High is at capacity and bussing of students may be . necessary. The $750 per lot fee proposed will not pay for the cost of bussing a student for a year let alone cover the multiple years that will be required nor will it cover any of the costs associated with building additional facilities. L From a factual basis the EIS should note that all sewering proposals in this area have been 27 initiated by the proponent. This area is outside the counties 15 year priority sewering basin and the county has no plans or desire to see sewers e}ctended in this area. In fact, efforts were made in . the fall of 1994 to restrict sewer extensions in this area due to the recognized capacity limits at the regional treatment plant. This proposal was opposed by developer interests and the county is still ' "studying" the issue of where sewers extensions should be allowed. In the absence of clear policy prohibiting sewer extension in this area the county commissioners approved a developer financed sewer extension to meet the needs of already approved lots in Meadovwiew Ranch Estates and Morningside. The agreement however specifically prohibits it being used as a justification for future development. The statement that sewer capacity can be assumed to be avaiiable for Turtle .JCreek and Meadovwiew Terrace is therefore erroneous. The proponent's attempt to use the ,sewering agreement in this manner makes it clear that ciDntrary to other statements in this EIS the - primary purpose of the proposed sewer extension is to promote additional urban growth in this area including Turtle Creek. Both of the approved developments discussed above (Morningside .and Meadovwiew Ranch Estates) for which the sewer was supposedly needed could be completed without the proposed sewer extension. Meadovwiew Ranch Estates was approved for use of septic systems and Morningside could be sewered to the west although due to the contour of the land a pump would be required. Proposed Action and Alternatives - Page 1 ~ Micaview questions the statement made throughout the EIS that the majority of the 6.7 acres of 28 open space are along Saltese Creek. A review of the site map indicates that a good share of the open space is consunied by the " unstable area where a gravel pit was filled with undesirable fill including constniction debris". Micaview, in earlier hearings, requested information on what is actually in this previous pit and what if any hazards might exist to children, animals, etc. who will play and dig here. The EIS indicates no review of this area. Micaview believes this needs to be addressed before a final EIS can be accepted. ~ The section again misstates that 8th Avenue will provide east and west access. 1.0 Lower Density Alternative - page 6 ~ I ~ , , y}..y. n• n.• r-° ~ R . Response to Letter No. 9(continued) . WAC 197-11-660 (1)(d) states that "Responsibility for implementing mitigation -measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of its proposal." See also responses to comment " #3 above and comments #64 through #68 below. 26. See response to comment #67 below. 27. Spokane County has recently updated its Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (CWMP). The sewer basin priority approach contained in the CWMP is based on public health criteria and "the County's ability to fund and ~ manage a finite number of projects each year." The basins are organized into an annual schedule of sewer construction for a 6- and 15-year horizon. The ~ Spokane County Sewer Ordinance does not restrict special connection extensions, provided that when property owners or developers construct or finance public sewer extensions, they are built to County design criteria and construction standards; located within County right-of-ways or easements; and are conveyed to the County free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Property owners or developers must also pay all applicable fees and charges and comply with the Sewer Standards Handbook. The County's focus for prioritizing sewcr extensions and committing public ~ financial resources is to eliminate existing septic systems over the Spokane aquifer. In addition the County has approved plats in the area, conditioned . them with sewers, and approved construction of sewer lines in 8th Avenue and . Long Road. On May 23, 1996 the County Division of Engineering proposed to increase the size of the Long Road sewer from 8-inches to 18-inches in diameter and issued a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). The DNS was appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, who upheld the appeal at a public hearing held on July 9, 1996 and withdrew the DNS. A request for reconsideration of the Board's decision was denied on August 27, 1996. m As discussed on page 73 of the DEIS, the Sewer Connection Agreement between Spokane County, Heptons, and Dahm Development, Inc. dated August 1, 1995,(Resolution No. 95-0874) formally approves construction of an 8-inch sewer line extending south in Long Road from the South Valley Sewer Interceptor to 8th Avenue and east in 8th Avenue to Harmony Road. The Agreement does not address its use as justification for future development. However, the Agreement provides for sewer capacity to be specifically reserved for developments proposed by Dahm, including. the proposed Turtle Creek project. The Agreement does specify that "Nothing in this agreement shall be construed to grant Dahm or Heptons the right to or expectancy for preliminary or final approval of any land use proposal." The DEIS does not in anyway Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments . Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 - Page 7 Micaview disagrees with the statement in this section that the lower, 1 unit per acre, density is not 29 consistent with current zoning. Under the comprehensive plan the urban category includes densities anywhere from 1 to 17 units per acre. Development at this level was approved directly north of the proposed Turtle Creek in 1994. Micaview also finds the reference in this section to the Central Puget Sound Growth Management 30 Hearing Board Decisions, (Brenerton,et at., v. Kitsap County) interesting since elsewhere in the JL EIS the proponent contends that the provisions of GMA should not be considered in making a ~ decision on this subdivision request. Micaview agrees that GMA provisions should apply to current subdivision requests and is willing to have the precedent set in the above case applied to the Turtle Creek proposal. The references made by the proponent regarding this case are however, incomplete. This case does define 1 and 2.5 acre lots to be urban not rural. It goes on to state that this type of lot is acceptable under certain specified circumstances but a county can not, as Kitsap attempted to do, zone the entire unincorporated area of the county outside of UGA's at these levels. The board went on to state that a pattern of 1 or 2.5 acre parcels would constitute sprawl As wom1d anv development pB~posed at LESS THAN 4 DWELLING j.TNITS PER ACEL (Emphasis provided). Thus, if this decision is to be considered the only presented ' .alternative that would be acceptable is the no action alternative since both the proposed developement and the lower-density alternative promote sprawl. Micaview agrees that the no action alternative is in the best interest of the citizens c: Spokane County and would support such a finding by the Planning Department. As indicated above Micaview questions the proponents contention that sewering at the lower 31 density would not be cost effective for the reasons previously stated. (see comments relative to pages S-2 and S-3 above) Micaview objects to the inclusion of the proponents subjective statements relative to formation of 32 a homeowners association and or restrictive covenants. There is absolutely no reason to believe that a homeowners association would not be formed or that the wetland areas along Saltese Creek . would be afforded less protection because less homes and thus less people would be involved. , ) . Logically the opposite is true. If less homes are ! involved there are less people to negatively impact the environment. There is also no logical , reason to assume that the absence of covenants and restrictions would result in an aesthetically less desirable area. 2.0 No-Action Alternative ~ The proponent's statement in this section that building homes would reduce the rate of fertilizers 33 and pest/weed control products is both untrue and inconsistent with statements made elsewhere in the EIS. , ~ . ' r.1: .A} f R • • , . . ~ o Response to Letter No. 9(continued) assume approval but states that capacity in the sewer lines is available. Several homes have been completed in Meadovwiew Ranch Estates with septic systems and dry sewer lines. Due to the soil types found on-site, many of the homes require installation of alternate septic systems which are much more . expensive than standard systems. Even though this development was approved for septics in the short term, sewering of the site has been approved. Resolution No. 95-0874 formally approves sewer construction to serve Meadowview Ranch Estates. ~ ~ Morningside PUD cannot be totally sewered to the west because according to - County Utilities, the pump station serving that basin (Ridgemont Estates) is not large enough and was not planned to handle sewage from other basins. Approximately half of Morningside PUD lies within a sewer basin that gravity flows to the northeast and half of the lots can be served by sewer lines extending westward. County Utilities has indicated that additional sewage flow from Morningside PUD beyond that generated from the westward trending basin cannot be-directed to the west. 28. Impacts on public health were not identified for study in the DEIS (see Final ~ Scoping Notice in Appendix A). As stated on page 38 of the DEIS, , approximately two acres of open space along Barker Road was previously used as a gravel pit. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was completed by _ Leppo Consultants, Inc. in June 1994 and included review of the project site and surrounding properties. The purpose of the Phase I Assessment was to "identify potential risk and/or liability associated with environmental and public heath considerations." The Phase I Assessment "reviewed commonly known or reasonably ascertainable infoemation and investigated by obvious inspection for the presence or likely presence of property contamination by hazardous , materials." This study, discusses the small gravel pit located on the Turtle ~ Creek project site and indicates that it was closed and reclaimed in the late 1960s. The gravel pit is reportedly filled with soil and construction debris. Illegal dumping of yard waste and construction debris has occurred since closure. 'The Phase I Assessment did not reveal any "evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with. the subject site." See also response to comment #7 above. 29. See response to comment #8 above. The project site's current UR-3.5 zoning allows 10,000 square foot lot sizes but does not exclude development of one- acre lots. Turtle Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments . . ^ a - • . r Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 , Page 8 Micaview strongly disagrees with the statement that there is limited public benefit provided by 34 delaying or precluding residential development of the project site. The public benefits derived from not imposing urban development on this existing prime agricultural land are described in the first two paragraphs of this section of the EIS. The no action alternative will result in preservation of the - existing wetland in it's current forni, retention of wildlife habitat including migratory bird resting and feeding range, preservation of currently producing prime agricultural lands, reduction of urban sprawl . and elimination of conflict with existing rural lifestyles. It also does not increase demand on already L overtaxed public services including schools and parks, or divert scarce county resources such as ~ sewer capacity and sewer construction and road improvement funds from other areas where they will benefit county residents more. The incentive for continuing urban sprawl into the existing semi-rural community is also eliminated. As indicated above this alternative is the most consistent with the mandates of the Growth Management Act and in the best interest of the public as required by RCW 58.17.110. . Affected Environment, Significant Impacts, and Mitigating Measurers 1.0 Earth - pages 10 - 14 As stated above the EIS should be expanded to include the fact that all of this land is irrigated and 35 _ is therefore clearly prime agriculturalland under NRCS criteria. It should also clearly indicate ~ that this property is being actively farmed and has been actively farmed for well over 40 years ~.vith a variety of crops. Current crops include alfalfa and grain. ' 2.0 Air - pages 14 - 16 As indicated above Micaview questions the proponents statement that there are no significant 36 long term air quality impacts either on or off-site. No studies have been done to determine this fact. The introduction of approximately 1,000 additional vehicle trips will have an impact. The ~ fact that SRTC did not respond to a scoping request does not imply there are no impacts. ' Reliance on the air quality findings at an unrelated intersection are unacceptable under the requirements of both the Federal and Washington State Clean Air Acts. Air Quality studies are required any time an intersection is at or expect to go below LOS level C. The EIS clearly shows this to be the case, therefor Air Quality studies are required before a final EIS can be issued. Also as indicated above the PM10 impacts of current agricultural activities (plowing) and 37 . unpaved roads (8th Avenue) are very slight. The vast majority of the project site is in alfalfa , ' which is not plowed and over half of the unpaved section of 8th avenue has a pavement like : surface that currentiy generate no more dust that a paved road. The increased traffic associated with an urban development not to mention the wood smoke from fireplaces, etc. will more than offset any decrease in PM10. The traffic associated with the project will clearly increase the CO generated. I ~ ~ . ~ Response to Letter No. 9(continued) 30. Reference to this CPSGM Hearings Board case is included as an example only to provide a possible interpretation of the term "urban sprawl." Although this . decision is not binding on Spokane County, it may provide precedence to guide the rulings of the Eastern Board. Appropriate lot sizes and densities for Spokane County will be defined following revision of the Comprehensive Plan under the Growth Management Act and through decisions by the appropriate hearing body per current adopted policies and regulations. See also response to comment #51 below for further discussion regarding the Growth Management Act. ~ 31. See response to comment #9 above. . 32. See response to comment #10 above. 33. Page 8 of the DEIS discusses the conversion of land from agricultural to residential uses and indicates that directly adjacent to Saltese Creek, farming practices (with current and/or future use of fert ilizers and pest/weed control products) would be replaced by open space/wetland buffers. Application of these products in the wetland buffer areas adjacent to the creek would be prevented by the restrictive covenants developed for the project. Accurate records are not available concerning auantitative usage of fertifizers or ~ pest/weed control products. 34. See responses to Letter No. 13, comment #6 and comment #51 below. 35. See response to comment #11 above. 36. See response to comment #13 above. 37. See response to comment #14 above. ~ Turtle Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments • ; - , ~ .•Z.r: A ~ Spokane County Division of Building and Planning ~March 4, 1996 ~ Page 9 . s 3.0 Water - pages 16 - 20 Some of the statistics provided relative to the Category III wetland bordering the site seem 3$ inconsistent and need clarification. The channel is stated as 20 feet wide and yet the bottom of . page 17 indicates the wetland is only 10 to 12 feet at the east boarder and only 4 feet at the west end of the site. The 20 foot channel is located in a 35 foot strip owner by other therefore only 7.5 feet not 15 feet would be the non-site buffer provided. These are not major issues but should be - corrected. Micaview disagrees with the indication that introduction of urban housing on this site will actually 39 improve water quality of Saltese Creek (bottom of page 18) and enhance the wetland associated with it. The amount of fertilizers and pest/control used will be no less and in fact probably more given the current crop grown on this site. In addition humans, over 200 of them in this case, bring a11 types of addition contaminates with them as indicated on page 18. The proposed developrnent will cover a good portion of the land with impervious surfaces increasing run off and . potential contamination of the creek. Micaview recognizes that stormwater practices required by .the county attempt to mitigate, as much as possible, the negative impacts of humans on the environment. However, to imply, as this EIS does, that urban sprawl is actually good for the environment is ludicrous. The county will adopt a new critical areas ordinance on March 26, 1996. Since this ordinance 40 will be adopted before the final EIS will be published and before any possible approval date for this project Micaview requests that the project be reviewed for conformance with the provisions of this new ordinance. Built Environment ~ 1.0 Land Use - pages . ~ The discussion on the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning fails to mention several facts Micaview 41 believes are relev.ant. The Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 1981 as a general guideline and was , intended to be reviewed on a regular basis. While other areas of the county have been reviewed and ~ the plan amended to indicate the resulting changes the required sub-area review for this part of the county ha.s never taken place. Thus the comprehensive plan designations, zoning, etc. are based on the counties best guess at what would be appropriate back in 1981. Since that date many changes have taken place that change the appropriate land uses. Many of these changes have occurred since a zoning was implemented back in 1991. A major change is,the rethinking of the priority sewer area. ; The county no longer has plans to sewer the entire Spokane Valley. A new 15 year priority sewer area has been established and ends well to the west of this area. . The Arterial Road Plan has also been somewhat rethought. The money to provide the upgrades thought to be possible in 1981 is simply . •T~ . - , Response to Letter No. 9(continued) a' • 38. The jurisdictional wetlands (between four and 12 feet wide) are smaller in width . and are located wholly within the 20-foot drainage ditch. Therefore, there are areas within the 20-foot ditch that are not classified as wetlands. Depending on the exact location within the project site, the areas within the ditch that are not wetlands, plus the right-of-way outside the ditch, plus the 30-foot minimum open space corridor, provides approximately 45 to . 50 feet between the wetlands and adjacent lots. 39. See response to comment #15 above. ~ ~ 40. The DEIS and these responses have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations in effect at the time the completed application package and associated fees were accepted by Spokane County. According to Noble Manor v. Pierce CountV (81 Wn App. 141, April 1996), "The vested rights doctrine, as codified at RCW 19.27.095 and expanded by RCW 58.17.033, provides that developers of land are entitled to have their land development proposals processed under the regulations in effect at the time a fully completed building permit -or land division application is submitted, regardless of subsequent changes in zoning or other land use regulations." 41. The project proponent is entitled to reviE•rv of the proposed project under the _ ~ existing rules and regulations (see response to #40 above), regardless of their ' date of adoption. See also response to comment #27 above regarding a 15- year priority sewer area. ~ Turt/e Creek Fina/ ElS September 1996 Response to Comments ~ . - a Spokane County Division of Building and Planning . March 4, 1996 ~ Page 10 not available. The LJIA as defined by the 1981 Comprehensive Plan was designed to accommodate - growth for the next 100 years. The discussion in the EIS relative to a re-zone request references land that is not included in Turtle 42 ~ Creek or any of the other development proposals discussed in the EIS. Thus, it's relevance as a precedent is questionable. However, it is interesting to note that all of the reasons given by the Board of County Commissioners for rejecting that request, i.e. the need to provide sewer, the arterial road plan and Central Valley School District plans for a nearby school, have changed. Given that none of ~ these issues exists toda the wa the Board antici ated it is hi hl tikel this re uest if made toda Y Y P g Y Y q Y would be approved. M'icaview again wishes to disagree with the proponents statement that the Comprehensive Plan does 43 not support retention of agricultural lands in all land use categories we also disagree that this project is consistent with the goals of the urban category specifically: _ 1. Objective l, l.a - Promoted fill-in development within established development areas and existing outlying communities where utilities, arterials, schools, and community facilities have already been established. _ This is not a fill-in development. As indicated e1_sewhere in the EIS utilities, arterials, 44 , school and community facilities are not in place to support this development. :2. Objective l.l.d - Endorse the basic right offree choice for all_people to live where they please. This project is not required to meet this need. Single-family lots of comparable size and 45 price range are already available in the immediate area. . 3. Objective l. l.f - Encourage innovative ideas by providing opportunities to test them. ~ This plat does not contain any creative or irunovative ideas. It's layout is identical to other 46 developments in the area. The open space provided is done.only because of the unstable ground associated with the old dump site and the wetland buffers required. This plat does nothing to increase open space or recreational facilities. It has a negative impact on existing park deficiencies in the area. . 4. Objective 1.5.a - New residential or multiple-family development should be buffered from existing f ~ adjacent land use where adverse effects may develop. ~ . The proposed plat for Turtle Creek does not meet this objective. There is no attempt 47 to buffer this development from the multi-acre large animal keeping life style to the north or. the agricultural uses to the south and east. This is a major concern of area residents. ~ - : t. h s. ~ P.~ e. •'z. - . 4 . ! D. . " Response to Letter No. 9(continued) 42. The comments presented are subjective in nature and do not require further response. . :A; - 43. See response to comment #16 above. 44. As stated on page 28 of the DEIS, "power supplies, water sanitary sewers, streets, schools, police, and fire services surround the site." In addition the project site is located within the PSSA boundary and includes hook-up to the County sewer system, complying with the intent of Section 10.1 Water Quality of the Comprehensive Plan. The definition of "fill-in" is subjective in nature and ~ is subject to interpretation by the appropriate hearing body. 45. See response to Letter No. 10, comment #4. 46. The project includes 6.7 acres of designated open space. Impacts on parks and recreation are discussed in Section 3.3 of the DEIS. 47. Page°32 of the DEIS states that open space areas will provide some buffering to the south and that buffering is not provided to the north. The appropriate hearing body could condition the plat to require redesign to add additional buffers. - ~i Turtle Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments . .Yr ~j~~, ~ Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 Page 11 S. Goal 1.6 An orderly pattern of development should be established between developed and undeveloped area. This proposal does not represent orderly development. It places a spot urban 48 development within an existing agriculturaUsemi-rural setting. Other areas already characterized by urban development and with a full range of urban services are readily available to meet the housing demands of unincorporated Spokane County. ~ Relationsbip to Growth Management Act - pages 34 - 37 . The discussion regarding the Growth Management act in the Morningside Heights EIS is 49 incorporated by reference into the Turtle Creek EIS. This discussion ignores the most basis tenant of the Growth Management Act, that continuing urban sprawl encroaching on rural land has adverse impacts on the environment and should be allowed only when already urbanized areas are unable to absorb anticipated population growth. This has not been shown to be the case. Significant quantities of land are available to the west of this plat to absorb even the most liberal population forecast. Since Spokane County has been required to plan under GMA since 1993 the approval of this plat will violate the GMA. _ The Morningside Heights EIS also incorrectly implies iiiat Spokane County's Urban Growth Area 50 (UGA) will be defined as the existing Urban Impact Area (UTA). The current LTIA was define to coincide with the Priority Sewer Service Area ar!d covers a larger area than anticipated to be included in the UGA developed under GMA guidelines. There is no justification to continue to approve subdivisions based on an UTA defined in 1981 and designed for 100 years of growth, when more recent information indicates it is inappropriate. Approval of urban developments that continue to infringe on rural lands is contrary to GMA. The fact that this proposal is an infringement is supported by the proponent's description of surrounding lands. ~ A Determination as to Whether the Public Use and Interest Will Be Served bY the ProPosed . Subdivision Requires Compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). ~ SEPA requires the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for any "major action[J 51 , significantly affecting the quality of the environment." RCW 43.21C.030. The basic purpose 'of this command is "to require local governments to consider total environmental : and ecological factors to the fullest extent when taking 'major actions significantly affecting the quality of the environment."' Lassila v. Wenatchee, 89 Wn.2d 804, 813, 576 P.2d 54 (1978)-(quoting ~ - RCW 43.21C.030); Sisley v. Sari Juat1 Cy., 89 Wn.2d 78, 82, 569 P.2d 712 (1977). In this case, the EIS should analyze the extent to which it is necessary to create further UGAs or urban areas in general which might be designated areas of concentrated growth in light of the principles and policies of the Act and the specifically identified environmental concern that sprawl is `h p. , . Response to Letter No. 9(continued) : 48. See response to Letter No. 10, comment #4. 49. See responses to comments #40 above and #51 below. 50. The DEIS does not state nor imply that the UG'A boundary that wiil be established in the future will be defined as the existing UTA boundary. On page 35 the DEIS states "The establishment of urban growth areas will require the re-evaluation of all existing policies and plans related to urban growth. For . Spokane County, this includes the re-evafuation of the existing 1990 _ Comprehensive Plan and existing UTA boundaries and policies. Along with the ~ County-wide Planning Policies, future UGA boundaries will be based on -population and employment forecasts, feasibility of provision of utilities and services, and land use trends." The transition period during the GMA planning/implementation process will likely result in an uncertain environment for development and speculation until all the required policies and implementation ordinances are adopted. While this process is underway, existing -regulations'and ordinances must be used by the decision-makers when reviewing development proposals (see response to # 40 above). The scope of the DEIS does not include the location of future UGA boundaries (see also response to comment #51 below). 51. As Lead Agency, the County Division of Building and Planning published a Determination of Significance (DS) and request for comments on the scope of I the Turtle Creek EIS on August 10, 1995. Six comment letters were received ~ during the scoping period which ended August 31, 1995. The scope of the EIS was modified to reflect the comments received and a Final Scoping Notice was issued (see Appendix A). The Final Scoping Notice specifically states that "any ~ comparison of the proposal to the goals of GMA are premature at this point." The information presented in Section 1.2 of the DEIS describes the GMA planning process in general and the current, status of its implementation in Spokane County. Discussion is presented concerning the project's relationship to the currently adopted policies, although all the specific regulations and ordinances implementing these policies have not been adopted. While Spokane County has been mandated to plan under the Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), its permitting process and review thereunder is pursuant to its currently adopted Comprehensive Plan and the development regulations which are now in effect. The permitting process is not to be used as a comprehensive planning process for growth management (RCW Tuit/e Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 Page 12 the antithesis of good environmental Iand use planning. Further, EIS should analyze elements relating - - to the concurrency of the provision of services. ` Finally, in additior~ an EIS should analyze the impact of providing concurrent services at the location of the proposed subdivision where it may in fact be the case that the provision of services may be diminished in other areas that have already been designated or might be more appropriately designated as urban growth areas. ~ This Subdivision Is Against the Public Policy of the State of Washington. RCW 36.70A.010 Legislative findings. The legislature finds that uncoordinated and unplanned growth, 51 together with a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in the conservation and the wise use of our lands, pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety, and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state. It is ( in the public interest that citizens, communities, local governments, and the private sector cooperate and coordinate with one another in comprehensive land use planning. Further, the legislature finds that it is in the public interest that economi:, development programs be i shared with communities experiencing insufficient economic growth. RCW 36.70A.020 Planning goals. The following goals are adopted to guide the development and adoption of comprehensive plans and development regulations of ~ those counties and cities that are required or choose to plan under RCW 36.70A.040. The following goals are not listed in order of ~ priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations: (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. (2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate . conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development. (3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal - transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. . ~ , Y A,r Uf ~.i .~~)i+"- c ~ • i Response to Letter No. 9(continued) 36.70A, Section 102 Chapter 347 Laws of 19951. Proposed plats and subdivisions must be approved or disapproved based on whether or not "Appropriate provisions are made for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads, alleys, or other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure . safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) ~7 the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication" (RCW 58.17.110(2)1. Washington law requires only that a"rule of reason" be used in analyzing and reviewing proposed impacts and alternatives to a specific project. SWAP v. Okanoaan Countv,, 66 Wn. App. 439, 832 P.2d 503 (1992). An EIS is not required to include impacts which are not probable, significant, adverse or environmental. RCW 43.21 C.031, RCW 43.21 C.110(1)(d), WAC 197-11-782. Consistent with the rule of reason, SEPA does not require or mean that every possible conceivable and remote impact must be discussed. The concept of "concu'rrency" is discusscu in Chapter 365-195-070(3) WAC entitled Growth Management Act - Procedural Criteria for Adopting Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations. This legislation states that "concurrency describes the situation in which adequate facilities are available when the impacts of development occur, or within a specified time thereafter." . In addition this section of the referenced WAC states that local jurisdictions "are not limited to imposing moratoria on development during periods when concurrency is not maintained." Section 365-195-210 WAC also provides the . following definitions: r~ "Concurrency" means that adequate public facilities are available when the impacts of development occur. This definition includes the two concepts of "adequate public facilities" and of "available public facilities" as defined above. "Adequate public facilities" means facilities which have the capacity to ' serve development without decreasing levels of service below locally established minimums. "Available public facilities" means that facilities or services are in place or that a financial commitment is in place to provide the facilities or services within a specified time. In the case of transportation, the specified time :Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments • 6 Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 ; Page 13 (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens ~ of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic gowth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities. (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. 51 (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed :n a timely and fair manner ~ to ensure predictability. . (8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource-based industries, including productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forest. lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses. ~ (9) Open space and recreation. Encourage the retention of open space and development of - recreational . opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks. (10) Environment. Protect the environment and . enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water. - . ti _ (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure ~r coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. . , .a.- ~ `J . fY`'tY.g{~°'~H.}T~`~t'~1} _~yc •'1.. A Response to Letter No. 9(continued) . is six years from the time of development. ,b. t. "Financial commitment" means that sources of public or private funds or 1~..combinations thereof have been identified which will be sufficient to finance public facilities necessary to support development and that there is reasonable assurance that such funds will be timely put to that end. . ~ ~ . - e9 t= c' . : • Turt/e Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments ~If' 4~.•~r''.v S1ii.h„ - "'.r' , 7'• . Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 Page 14 (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall y be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service , levels below locally established minimum standards. (13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the L preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. ~ A review of the foregoing indicates that it is clearly the public policy of the State of Washington to deny subdivisions such as the one being requested under the circumstances of the particular case in -this instance. Here, there is no possibility of a determination that it is necessary from a population requirement to expand the urban area outside of what currently are the city boundaries of the cities in the County of Spokane and the Central Valley core area already being sewered. It would be , arbitrary and capricious to attempt to create a spot zone urban area out in the area of semi-rural 51 development to create an urban sprawl area. It would also be arbitrary and capricious to engage in +his kind of subdivision in that an additional - outgrowth of this subdivision would a11ow for other subdivisions to the south, east and north in that after an approval of this kind, it would be claimed that services could be provided concurrently. +A decision to allow development here would be the antithesis of the public policy against sprawl and the policies already identified in the GMA as applicable to the planning processing of the County of Spokane. Also, for the County of Spokane to engage in planning under GMA on the one hand and not engage ~ in decisions with respect of the fulfillment of that planning process during the interim would be arbitrary and capncious and against public policy. . Approval of this Subdivision Will Jeopardize the Delivery of Services in Areas Which Are Already Urban. and May Be Designated as Within the UGA. This proposal will make demand on services. This demand will take away from the ability to provide services to areas which are urban. It would be against public policy to prevent the infill of areas which : are already urban in character so as to extend, unnecessarily, areas outside of urban areas. Public , policy requires strategies which prohibit development approval if the development- causes the level of service to decline. See, e.g., RCW 36.70A.070. , The county is planning under the Act. Its actions have to be in compliance with that planning effort. The county, as part of that obligation, must not engage in actions which are contrary to public policy. . .-a . ; a;=,~: • '.F:.•:r rr t _ Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 - Page 15 It is the public policy of the State of Washington to declare that urban sprawl in environmentally and economically unsound. Adjacent Land Use and Surrounding Development pages 38-42 Comments made above relative to the proponents statement that the project site in located on the 52 . fringe of a developing area transitioning to urban land uses apply here as well. The area currently L provides a very nice transition from more dense development to the north to the current agricultural ~ of this project site. Denial of this proposal would preserve the existing transition from agriculture to urban. Approval of this project will provide inducement for further urban development. The estimate of potential development provided in table 2 is understated based on the proponent's 53 .propensity to request bonus densities and zone changes. This is particularly true for land owned by ~ Jay Investment Company or other family members based on past history of development. This site is located outside the 15-year priority sewer service area. The sewer extension was 54 ( proposed and financed by the proponent and is not part of the county sewering program. The sewer ' .,extension was granted for the sole purpose of allowing sewering of already approved lots in ,Meadowview Ranch Estates and Morningside. The agreement specifically prohibits its being used _ to support additional development. ~ . :.Approval of this subdivision will provide added stimulus for development of surrounding undeveloped 55 `property. 2.0 Transportation The description of Barker Road makes no mention of the fact that a substantial number of existing 56 ~ homes north of Sth Avenue directly access Barker giving rise to traffic flow interruptions as people t' ~ attempt to enter and exist their driveways. Micaview questions that Barker can, in its current state, handle the increased traffic anticipated in the study from both a traffic flow and pedestrian safety ' standpoint. The description of Long Road incorrectly indicates it is paved all the way to 8th Avenue. There is 57 . an unpaved potion between 6th Avenue and 8th Avenue. . Once again Micaview notes that the traffic study should look at a 5 year rather than a 3 year 58 window to coincide with the anticipated build out of Turtle Creek. -~i . The traffic analysis makes no allowances for the presence of an Elementary and Junior High 59 . School in the immediately vicinity. The presence of these facilities causes a disruption of normally expected traffic flow particularly as it relates to the use of 8th avenue west of Barker, and the , -:~s t ' . . 4 's t3~: . Response to Letter No. 9(continued) 52. See response to comment #17 above. The potential for growth inducement is . addressed on pages 41 and 74 of the DEIS, where it is indicated that this , project may be an added stimulus to the already "existing County plans and regulations that provide the opportunity for subdivisions to occur." 53. Estimates concerning the potential number of units on undeveloped properties ~ with no formalized development plans can only be assumed based on existing zoning. It would be speculativeto assume the approval of future zone change or bonus density requests, therefore the assumptions presented are not ~ approprrate for review under SEPA. 54. See response to comment #27 above. 55. See response to comment #52 above. 56. See response to comment #23 above. 57. A portion of Long Road between 6th and 8th Avenues is not paved. Paving this section of Long Road is included on page 53 of the DEIS as mitigation for development of the Turtle Creek plat. 58. See response to comment #20 above. 59. The traffic analysis took into account all surrounding land uses. The hour when school is dismissed does not coincide with the hour when the peak volume of traffic occurs on the transportation system. References suggesting that school traffic and the PM peak hour traffic fall at the same time of day are erroneous. . When schools are dismissed there are fewer cars operating within the . transportation system and the intersections are working at higher levels of service than reported in the DEIS. With the mitigation outlined in the Turtle ~ Creek DEIS, 8th Avenue will be able to adequately handle any school traffic, as well as the traffic from development of Turtle Creek. See also response to Letter No., comment #2. E. - Turtle Creek Fina! ElS September 1996 Response to Comments ..{j'!~;-~~ C ~ nty~f. , Y ! • 7 t -Spokan~ County Division of Building and Planning _ March 4, 1996 Page 16 Long/Sprague/Appleway route. This issue was raised at the hearing before the Board of County 59 Commissioners, and in response to the Morningside Heights EIS. This issue has still not been addressed and as a result the trip generation information used at the bottom of page 48 continuing to the top of page 49 is not accurate. We believe that Turtle Creek will add more than 2 cars to the SpraguelAppleway intersection during PM peak hours. The traffic counts taken at 8th avenue were done during the summer months and are not an F'jQ accurate reflection of current and thus projected traffic flow. ~ ~ Micaview requests that a traffic analysis be performed assuming that only the already approved 61 projects (including Riverwalk and Meadovweiw Ranch Estates but excluding Turtle Creek, Morningside Heights, and Meadovwiew Terrace) are allowed. This appears to us to be the more appropriate `.`No-Action Alternative". analysis. The mitigation's required of these projects should ~be included and the result analyzed. This truly reflects the alternatives available to the county. If this project is approved the mitigation % assigned to Turtle Creek should be based on the 62 analysis of impact based on the discussion on table 6 and page 48. Micaview also again notes that the need to widen Barker is not included in this study and is a required element. 1Vi'icaview disagrees with the statement at page 59 that :here will be no impacts on the arterial 63 - .road system. The EIS continues to discuss Barker as being a principle arterial throughout this area and fails to mention its current 21ane, local access character. I , ~ 3.0 Public Services and Utilities - pages 61- 75 i ~ The statistics relative to crime rate included on page 62 are useless as,,presented since they do not 64 reference what part of the county they represent or provide any information on the total number of y ~ crimes and police calls generated. The issue that needs to be addressed is: can adequate police M-N protection be assured concurrent with development build out? The number of additional police resources needed and how they would be funded by the development'is not addressed. While the . ~ project design may reduce crime verses a grid design (input from the police department on this issue ` would be very interesting) there is no question that the addition of 101 homes where there are currently none will increase the demand on police services. ,a . .s . It should be noted that the demand for services will begin with the first house. Since there is currently 65 , no service to this area the cost of service per house will be disproportionate in the early years of build . out. . A Table 13, Property Tax Revenue is misleading in its current form. Tax revenue in the amount shown 66 - in the table would not be available until at least the year 2001 based on the proponents projected building plan. If such a table is to be included it should show the taxes incrementally, by year, starting . with 1997. It would be mid to late 1996 before any homes are built and 1997 before the tax revenue r' .y: '+~;,~'~~,';~':J•L~b s C4; Response to Letter No. 9(continued) 60. Traffic. volumes are at their highest during the summer months. This fact is substantiated in numerous studies related to traffic impacts, including the Traffic Enaineerinp Handbook, 4th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Using summer traffic volumes is acceptable when conducting a traffic study. ~ Traffic volumes were collected at Sprague Avenue and Appleway during_ the school year. This intersection will be affected by school traffic and has higher . traffic volumes than other intersections which experience school-related traffic. . ~ The impacts at the intersection of Barker Road and 8th Avenue would not ~ change enough between a school condition and a non-school condition to alter the mitigation required by the Turtle Creek project. ~ . ~ 61. An intersection level of service analysis including existing traffic generators only in the year 2005 is provided on pages 34, 35, and 36 of the Barker Road Traffic Impact Analysis and Corridor Study (Appendix C of the DEIS). 62. - See response to comment #24 above. 63. See response to Letter No. 14, comment #10: ~ 64. The crime rate percentages presented were provided by the Sheriff's Department Crime Prevention Unit as referenced in the DElS on page 62. During preparation of the DEIS, this information was determined to be the most current and applicable to development projects in Spokane County. Detailed information from the Sheriff's Department study beyond that summarized in the DEIS can be obtained from their office. Statements concerning cul-de-sacs versus a grid lot layout design were originally made by Jim Alma of the County ' Crime Prevention Unit; who has since retired from the Sheriff's Department. The DEIS addresses the currently inadequate police coverage for the County, F-5 as stated by Greg Snyder of the Sheriff's Department, and the added responsibility for police protection the project would require. There was no direct correlation presented by the Sheriff's Department between the number of lots in any one development and.the resultant impact on staffing needs. Therefore, no specific numbers of additional staff required by the - proposed project are discussed in the DEIS. Sheriff's Department staffing needs relate to the County as a whole and are outside the scope of this DEIS. The funding mechanism available to the Sheriff's Department for increased staffing and equipment is property tax revenues. As discussed on page 65 of the DEIS, the increased property tax revenues generated by the development Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments P,:~ . 'y '-•a .•Y~,• ,t; . + Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 Page 17 would be collected and available for use. This type of presentation is in line with statements elsewhere in the EIS that impacts will occur gadually due to phasing. If impacts are to occur gradually so will tax revenue. . This site lies within walking distance of Greenacres Elementary and Cneenacres Junior High. The EIS 67 correctly states that these school service this site. The reference to Sunrise Elementary and Horizon - Junior High are incorrect. These school serve students from this area only because of overcrowding . at the two Greenacres Schools. At the present time students generated by the Turtle Creek project ~ would have to be bussed, at extra expense to the District, to other school because of overcrowding. A,s commented above Greenacres Elementary School is at capacity in all grade levels and is bussing students to other schools. This has been the case for the last 2 years. Prior to that the school was at capacity in some grades and not others as is indicated in the EIS. Due to already approved subdivisions in the Greenacres attendance area this situation is expected to continue to get worse. Contrary to statements in the EIS the existing overcrowding of Greenacres Elementary and Greenacres Junior High is not due solely to growth at Liberty Lake. While a proposed elementary school at Liberty Lake will relieve the problem at Greenacres Elementary in the short term, already approved plats at Liberty Lake will quickly consume the 600 student capacity being planned. Lots ..already approved near Greenacres Elementary such as Riverwalk, Shelley Lake, Morningside and .Meadovwiew Ranch Estates will re-fill the capacity at Greenacres while already approved lots along . the Sullivan comdor will continue to expand demand on Adams and Sunrise Elementary schools. It should be noted that a school at Liberty Lake would not be ready to accept students before school year 1998-99 at the earliest. By then, using the statistics quoted in the EIS, Turtle Creek would have added a total of approximately 45 school age children including 27 elementary age students with no place to put them. The school at Liberty Lake will not help the additional 18 Junior High students ' Turtle Creek is expected to add to this districtu who also will have no place at the school they should . be attending. The EIS proposes no acceptable mitigation to provide the services required for these C4; and other students that will result if Turtle Creek is approved. ~ The $750 "voluntary" impact fee being proposed is not sufficient to cover the cost of providing the extra school facilities needed to accommodate the students this proposal will generate. This is supported by the following quote from a February 13, 1995 letter from Dave Jackman, Director, A Auxiliary Service, to Rich Dahm "Please note that currently requested school mitigation fees provide j only a small portion of the cost of school facilities." . , ~The tax revenue schedule shown in table 13 is very misleading. The tax revenues to schools . , generated by Turtle Creek will actually be approximately $8,462.5 in 1997, $25,387.50 in 1998 and $42,312.50 in 1999 (assuming an average of 25 homes per year at $120,000 average value with building to start in June 1996). This does not come close to supporting the facilities needed to house the 48 to 81 students (elementary through high school) expected over that same period. , A L . , .r . Response to Letter No. 9(continued) . will add to Sheriff Department funds. The estimated property tax revenues at full build-out of the project are presented in Table 13 on page 66 of the DEIS. See also response to comment #51 regarding concurrent provision of services. 65. The project site lies within service area boundaries related to provision of police, fire, and emergency services, as discussed in Section 3.1 of the DEIS. ~ . Adjacent residences are currently provided with these services and the demand will increase as the project is completed over a 3 to 5-year build-out period. The demand for services will be extremely low in the initial consiruction years. ~ 66. Throughout the DEIS potential impacts are discussed followingfull build-out of , the project site. Table 13 estimates the County property tax revenues ~ generated by the development at full build-out. Just as most potential impacts ~ would occur gradually over the estimated 3 to 5-year build-out discussed throughout the DEIS, the property tax revenues approximated in Table 13 would be generated gradually after homes are occupied. However property tax revenues, as well as other direct taxes such as retail sales, real estate 'excise, payroll, and income taxes, are also paid.by builders and developers prior to final purchase of a home. A report was prepared by Regional Analytic Sciences of Seattle for the Spokane Home Builders Association and the Spokane ~ Association of Realtors in November 1935 titled Taxes Paid on New Home' f Construction and the Economic Contribution of Residential Develooment in SDokane Countv. 1995. This report found that "an estimated total of $14,396 in direct taxes are paid to federal, state, city, and county government, including the local school, fire, library, and transit district in the course of producing and selling a median-priced ( $143,750) new home in unincorporated Spokane County." Of this amount the federal government receives approximately 29.1 ~ - percent, the state government a net 33.6%, the local school district approximately 22.5%, the county receives 11.9 percent, and 2.9 percent goes to the city and other local transit, fire, and sewer districts. Therefore tax ~ revenues will be generated by the project prior to final sale and occupation of the homes, in addition to the property tax revenues estimated in Table 13. 67. Further communication with Dave Jackman of Central Valley School District confirms the statements made in Section 3.2 of the DEIS concerning capacity . and bussing at Greenacres Elementary School. Staff at Greenacres Elementary , indicate the school had space available in grades four and five at the time the DEIS was prepared and to the best of their knowledge has never been completely full. The DEIS on page 68 states that area schools "would be impacted by the addition of new students from this and other residential developments proposed for the area." Tuitle Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Corrrments ~ . :M~„i,.-+~, , ;x. • ' _i ~ Response to Letter No. 9(continued) As stated on page 67 of the DEIS, "the existing capacity problems at Greenacres Elementary and Junior High Schools are due to the lack of schools . . serving the Liberty Lake area." However, this issue may become moot since on February 6, 1996 the District received approval for a bond issue to fund construction of a new elementary school near Liberty Lake. The School District Board is scheduled to approve the site plan for the new elementary school on September 23, 1996. Construction is scheduled to begin on the 600 student capacity school in May of 1997, with attendance to begin in September 1997. Based on current enrollment conditions, if Liberty Lake had schools now in their area, students residing near the Greenacres schools would not require bussing ~ to other schools because the Greenacres schools would have capacity. In the . future, enrollment pressures may increase gradually with the phased build-out of residential development projects in the area. The Shelley Lake development project is totally outside Greenacres Elementary's attendance boundary and only half of the Morningside PUD is inside its attendance boundary. ~ Page 66 of the DEIS incorrectly states that there are 12 elementary school and seven junior high schools. The District currently has 13 elementary schools and five junior high schools. The School District indicates that studen-La residing within Turtle Creek would attend Greenacres Elementary, assuming that the students now attending from the Liberty Lake area will go to the new elementary school in Liberty Lake following its construction. Proposed development projects are not required 'to provide mitigation for existing deficiencies, but to reduce impacts caused by the proposed projects. WAC 197-11-660 (1)(d) states that "Responsibility for implementing mitigation measures may beimposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts of its proposal." Funding sources to reduce ~ impacts on area schools include increased property tax revenues and the $750 per lot voluntary mitigation fee discussed in Section 3.2 of the DEIS. The current mitigation fee is "based on the cost of providing new permanent school facilities:" The $750 per unit mitigation fee is meant by the District to be a . partial contribution and is not intended to fully fund construction of new school facilities. As discussed above, funding sources to reduce impacts on area schools include - both increased property tax revenues and voluntary mitigation fees. Both these funds could support acquisition of portable classrooms, school buses, or contribute towards an identified construction/expansion project. See also response to comment #66 above. ' Turt/e Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments • . •1 Response to Letter No. 9(continued) K 68. As discussed above, proposed development projects are not required to provide ~ mitigation for existing deficiencies, but to reduce impacts caused by the proposed project. Section 3.3 of the DEIS discusses the fact that existing park facilities do not meet the needs of the existing population. See also response to comment #51 above regarding provision of public facilities. > . ~ 69. Sewer system capacity issues are discussed in Section 3.5 of the DEIS. See f: also response to comment # 50 above. . ~ . 70. Comments noted. At a public hearing, project proponents and opponents will have equal opportunity to present facts and provide comments to the appropriate hearing body for a decision subject to adopted policies and regulations. See also response to comment #27 above. - 71. See response to comment #27 above. Commissioner Hasson's opinion is noted. 72. The DEIS does not state that public sewering is available for Morningside Heights, Turtle Creek, and Meadovwiew Terrace. The analysis presented on pages 72 through 75 of the DEIS concludes that sewer canacity is available within the parameters established by the axisting lines and currently approved i- sewer plans to serve these proposed projects. The County Division of Utilities is responsible for approval of sewer extensions and for final determination of whether or not capacity exists to handle the proposed use. See also response to Letter No. 5, comment #2 regarding sewer capacity and Letter No. 14, comment #5 regarding costs. 7-7 f Turt/e Creek Fina/ ElS September 1996 Response to Comments 4 . ' '^Z • i _ Spokane County Division of Building and Planning a March 4, 1996 Page 18 'The EIS does not address the deficiency of parks in this area. The EIS correctly notes that increased 68 ` tax revenue does not necessarily result in increased public park services. Continuing to approve ~ urban density developments without providing commensurate pubtic facilities is contrary to the ~ existing Comprehensive Plan, Growth Management Act and RCW 58.17.110. . In discussing the appropriateness of diverting public sewer capacity to this area of the county it 69 should be noted that the project site lies close to the outside edge of both the LTIA and PSSA. The ; . EIS correctly notes that given current sewer plant limitations the entire PSSA can not be sewered. ~ Re-drawing the PSSA boundary was discussed and delayed pending completion of the GMA process. The current LTIA coincides with the Priority Sewer Service Area and covers a larger area than anticipated to be included in the UGA developed under GMA guidelines. The entire PSSA and corresponding LTIA is not needed to accommodate projected population growth over the next 20 years. The current LTIA encompasses at least 2 and in some estimates 4 times the land quantity needed to support the anticipated population under GMA planning. The PSSA could theoretically be shrunk-by more than half. Under these circumstances the appropriateness of extending sewers to the very edge of the current boundary lines into a basin that at present has no sewer service and is undeveloped has to be questioned. - ~ The EIS also correctly indicates that the County agreed to allow construction of an 8 inch sewer line 70 in this area only because current guidelines forced them to allow sewering of already approved lots - in Morningside and Meadovwiew Ranch Estates. The line was restricted to 8 inches (the smallest 'allowed size) because a larger line would allow more developments to be groposed in the area. , Micaview has repeatedly expressed concern about the extending of any size sewer line into the 71 Saltese basin because of the inducement it creates for further development. Micaview was assured that this was not the intent and that the agreement reached allowing theLong/8th Avenue sewer line . specifically stated sewer lines were being allowed for already approved lots only and would not be used to support further development in the area. Less than two months after this sewer agreement s ~ was signed the proponent used it for exactly that purpose in the Morningside Heights EIS. This same ~ argument is now being used to support the Turtle Creek project. Micaview believes that this was the ~ intent all along and that from an economic standpoint it is highly questionable that construction of ' the line can be justified without approval of Morningside Heights, Turtle Creek, or Meadovwiew Terrace or some combination of the above. See also the letter attached. . For all the above reasons Micaview believes the argument that public sewering is available for 72 Morningside Heights, Turtle Creek and Meadowview Terrace is incorrect. The decision of whether the limited amount of sewer capacity available to the county should be allocated to this currently undeveloped rural area or applied to the already urbanized areas to the west is still open for discussion. Micaview also notes that, although the proponent not the county is the one forcing ~ w•n~,r• • "I «.a,t~J ip*_, ~ f• f: . .Response to Letter No. 9(continued) ~ ~ R~- . ~ SPOKANE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL RECFl111c*[J 808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd • Spokane, WA 99201-3337 . 509/625-6370 • FAX G25-G988 SFp 0 1919 94 s''`.:: A!Y PLA~NiNG p~~~VNT'Y August 3V; "'"94 ;Thomas Velj ic Spokane County Planning 1026 West Broadway Avenue • Spokane, WA 99260 . Dear Mr. Veljic: • ~ . ~ We have reviewed the Turtle Creek Traffic Impact Analysis con- ducted by Inland Pacific Engineering. Based on the data submit- ted, it does not appear this project requires air quality analy- sis. This determination results from the low projected traffic volumes , produced by this development. Volumes this small while they generate emissions-, are generally considered to have little or no impact on overall air quality. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Glenn F. Miles Transportation Manager . . ~ ITEM I., ~ . PAGE f OF / y; ^.,..s~``C~,.o,; s..,. • : e ..r , . h . Spokane County Division of Building and Planning March 4, 1996 - Page 19 Y~v installation of this sewer line, under current financial agreements the county will be forced to pay a 72 . portion of this cost therby diverting scare sewering resources away from other areas where they are : both more needed and more appropriate. ~ ~ c ~ Very truly yours, EUGSTER HASKELL ~ (Stephen K: Eugster SKE:ske a 1 ■~M I , 'r • -~,1 f;(Sly ''i:4'.~4C? ~R ~f Response to Letter No. 9 tcontinuedy INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. : - ~ October 3, 1995 W.O. No. 94279 ~ e- . ~ Glenn F. Miles Spokane Regional Transportation Council W. 808 Spokane Falis Blvd., Room 627 " SPokane, WA 99201 RE: Neeci for Air Quality Conformity Review as apart of the Environmental ImPact Statement for Morningside Heights and Turtle Creek residentiaf develoPments ~ Dear Glenn: . I spoke with Eve Nelson earlier today, and explained to her that the environmental impact statements for both Morningside Heights and Turtle Creek were scoped to include air quality. Based upon the fact that no existing air quality violations occurred within this general area, the Draft EIS for Morningside Heights. was written essentially stating that fact, and the language -proposed for the Turtle Creek EIS is basically the same. The traffic study which was prePared in conjunction with these two EIS documents was a ( corridor level study of Barker Road in which irnpacLs to the various Barker Road intersections ~ were examined at different overall development levels. The proposed developments which were included in this corridor study include Riverwalk, IVieadowview Itanch Estates, Meadowview Terrace and possible development from other vacant land in the area which could generate traffic into the Barker Road corridor. Therefore, no project specific traffic impact analysis has been done for Morningside Heights. A threshold level traffic study was performed for Turtle Creek under a SEPA checklist, and although the scope of the project has not changed, this information has somewhat been superseded by the creation of the Barker Road Corridor Study. The Sullivan Road Corridor Study also includes traffic from Morningside Heights, and was used by the County as part of their reasoning for widening Sullivan Road to a seven lane facility. ~ We do not think an air quality conformity review is necessary for either of these projects, and we are requesting a letter from you concurring with this opinion. If you determine otherwise, please let us know the scope, and also the source of your determination so that the EIS documents can be prepared as completely as pnssihle. Thank you for your help on this. Sincerely, . 6 . Ann L. Winkler, P.E. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509-458-6840 . • FAX: 509-458-6844 ' f 1 T- 4- T S.r OFFlCE OF COUNT?' COMMISSIONERS ' . RECEIVED RE CE. VED ° gpOKANE COUNTY - . l. ov 1 s 1995 November 9, 1995 N OV 2 0 1995 ~ LAw oFFIces OIVI810N OF BUILDING AND PtANNING RZPHEN K. EUGStfR Mr. Stephen K. Eugster ~ ~ Attorney at Law BY' 100 Minnesota Building 423 West First Avenue Spokane, WA 99204-0206 Dear Stephen: This letter is in response to yours received concerning the sewer connectiori agreement between Spokane County, the Heptons, and Dahm . Development, Inc. You are correct in your assessment that the sewer connection agreement struck between the above named parties was limited to those areas where development has been approved and nothing more. VerY tr ly yours, , Steve sso ' . Coul~y Commissioner v, nnv c: Linda Tasca ~ April Taylor ~ 1116 WEST BROADtvAY AVE`'UE • $POKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0I00 •(509) 456-2265 , Y ' ~ . t s.. ,~"`c•~. . Response to Letter No. 10 -Harvey L. and Rosemarie B. Brown ' 1. See responses to Letter No. 9, comments #27 and #44. The public sewer . system capacity is discussed in detail in Section 3.5 of the DEIS. The proposed . project includes immediate hook-up to the sewer system through developer extension of approved lines in 8th Avenue. 2. The State Department of Ecology has determined that the buffers provided are _ ~ appropriate (see responses to Letter No. 2 and Appendix B of the DEIS). - Concerns regarding stormwater management impacts are also addressed in the responses to Letter No. 6. 3. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #3. . i Turt/e Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments ` fi :K''} 6 1' Y.'• _4'` - - wn~ c~r~ 1 ~ycc►, i lru r nrcyv, :...:,=ioctil,c•:.• rl11 ` . . . _ . , l LETTER NO. 10 ~ , . . Harvey L. Brown . ' S 1505 Barker Rd Greenacres WA 99016-9762 3-Mar-96 Home (509) 926-9906 ~ • •r Work (509) 482-8013 . John Pederson _ Spokane Couhty Division of Building and Planning ~ 1426 W. Broadway Spokane 11ilA 99260 Dear Sir, , V1/e have recently reviewed the Draft Environmental lmpact Statement for the ~ Turile Creek prefiminary ptat. We disagree with a number of statements witiiin the document. . 1. The proposaf states that it complies rnf±th the Comprphensive Land USe Plan. ` The Comprehensive l.and Use Pian encourages develUpment that fiills in .-established development areas. The plat area is in an existing semi- rurallagricuiturat area that is facking many of the urban services necessary to accommodate this level of development. The ex.tension of sevrers to this area ~ is solely for the interests of allowing new deve(opment. The County is a{ready struggling with providing sewer service to already established areas and has already reached capacity at iis soie sewage treatment plant. 2. The open space areas to protect ihe water guality of #he adjaceni Saltese 2 Creek is extremely minimal and does not address the run-off from residential ~ gardens and fawns that siope down to the creek. i 3. We do not believe there will be "minimized off-site iinpactu when alrnost tFie 3 maximum number of single-family dwelling units is developed on the project T site. Traffic effects, schooi crowding cono+tions and the already iliaximized load on the sewage treatment pfant woLild all be affected by the proposed 3) development. _ • cr' 4 . • r.~- . p-Z., - Yb•,.r .c { ' I 0 f...•. Response to Letter No. 10 (continued) 4. The development of housing subdivisions is a direct response to market demand. After projects receive approval, if the market demand declines, the proposed homes may not be constructed, thereby reducing potential impacts from project development. ~ . 5. Sewering costs are discussed on pages 6 and 8 of the DEIS. 6. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #5. . ~ 7. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #51. . ~ ~ ~ Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments • . . . , „ - ,~ri; ~,;ccr, ►~u r HA NU, ~Uy4tlL4U0U r, ue i i z.. . . •3 ` d. VJe ao not see a growing market demand for new housing in tfie generai area that cannot be met by fllin9 in alreadY established areas that have functionaE ( `uroan services. 5. The 5iaiemerlt inat pufting sewef cieveiopmeni in tne iower impaci eliernaiive ~j . plan would not be cost effective is very quAstionable since fewer lincs would have to be run off the main line on 8th Avenue. The va(ue of the properties on ,J {arger lots wouid ae increased and enhance the adjacent area more than the , higher density pian. fi. The proposai sta4es vne of its objectives as: "Provide an aesiiieticai{y pieasing 6 environment in an effort to enhar.ce adjacent land uses." This impiics Uiat housing devefopments enhance land use when in fact tney rarely do so. The ~ lack of addressing the issue of aimost non-existent public open space areas and allowances for a park does nof indicate any concern from the developer about maintaining or enhancing the surrounding envitonment and neighborhood. We recommend this proposed devefopment be delayed until the Growth Management Act can address the scarce service resources the County is dealing with and get more control aver urban spra.wl *and the critical shorfage of planned - open space and parks and recreation areas within the urban grovrth boundaries. Sincerely, ~ ~ . ~ Marvey L. Brotivn ~ Rosemarie Bisiar Brown sn,'s:vtlc:ti.~i;riJl~•:• r,il: 0 ' • L`Sl." i'e t' • • . V . K' Response to Letter No. 11 Patrick R. Brown 1. Impacts on wildlife were not identified for study in the DEIS (see Final Scoping s'Notice in Appendix A) and were not analyzed in the DEIS. The Wetland Reconnaissance and Evaluation of the Saltese Drainage Channel (Appendix B of the DEIS) mentions the presence of wildlife (pheasant and quail) as a typical part of the field investigation. ~ 2. The consistency of the proposed project with adjacent land uses .is discussed in Section 1.3 of the DEIS (see also response to Letter No. 9, comment #17). Property owners have the right to request. development of their land in accordance with the regulations and policies in force at the time of the request. Property owners also have the right not to request development if they so . chose. The proposed project does not prevent the keeping of large animals on adjacent property. 3. County Engineering requires that internal roads extend to plat boundaries to provide for future access to adjacent properties. Ownership of the adjacent property to the south of the Turtle Creek site is discussed on page 39 of the r DEIS. See also response to comment #2 above. ~ 4. See responses to Letter No. 9, comments #44 ard #47. . ~ : Turt/e Creek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments , f~ F., o•t..f~ i; ~1 ~ H LETTER NO. 11 ~ r . FRONt: Patricl: R. Brox\,n DATE: 25 Februarv 1996 E. ] 8??3 8th Ave ' Greenacres, VVA 99016 TO: Spokane County Planning and RE: 1Mv writteil comments on the Environmental Building Department (MS-P) Impact Statement for proposed plat 1026 West BroadNvay PE-1753-94 "Turtle Creek" Y~ Spokane WA 99260 . RECE+VE Attn ~ John Pederson ~~OKANE COt1MT'v ~ I will organize my comments per the outline of the EIS. . - I. Natural Environment ~,?1VIaJ4p+1 nF RUfI,Qh~4~.'~ HP1D Pl AN111!NP d. Earth 3Y: • The study of wildlife fails to mention the migratory birds that use this site every year. The study 1 also fails to-inention the coyotes that currently driiil: from the farnl pond across Saltese Creek from this proposed development. These animals will be deprived the use of t}lis site if this proposed development is built. In fact the only wildlife that this study even mentions are pheasant _ and quail. An assessment of wild animals and migratory birds should be done on this site before any proposed development is approved. :i II. Built Environment b. Land Use I live directly to the north of this proposed development, just across the width of 8th Avenue. Our 2 neighborhood is a low densit_y semi-rural communitv. Urban density developnlent is not consistent with the existing land uses of farming, the keeping of large animals and single family dwellings on ; lots from 1 to 5 acres along the north border of this proposed development. We are not anti-growth, rather, we want any growth to be consistent with the character and land uses of our neighborhood. This proposal represents massive change for our neighborhood. Farming and the keeping of large 3 `animals would be replaced by urban density housina on lots as small as 10,000 square feet. Right now there are 19 houses accessing the 1/2 nule of 8th Avenue fornung the northern border of this proposal. If approved this development would increase the number of houses accessing this same ~ road to 120! Further, the proposed plat map for this project shows clear intent to build more than these first 101 houses. The map proposes a road across the creek to approximately 80 acres of t buildab{e land owned by the same group. If you say yes to these l Ol houses, I suggest you will find it very difficult to say no to the next 200 houses. The same developer has extensive land holdings south of this 1/4 section. The sii►lple act of alloitying this proposed subrlityision ivill seal - the.fate of this area If tltey buil(I this proposed rleveloprrient ntliers ivill sjvi ftly, fullo)v. This project is not consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan 4 endorses the idea of buffering. Plopping 101 or more units of urban density housing between 1-5 acre lots with large animal keeping on the north and active agriculture uses on the south is not • 4 1• -r:tr^~f ti , ► a i ~~.Response to Letter No. 11 (continued) . 5. The surrounding transportation system, with the mitigation described in the DEIS and modified by the information provided in Appendix B, can adequately accommodate the additional traffic from development of the Turtle Creek plat. The need to construct a hard walking surface along Long Road between 8th and 4th Avenues to accommodate school children is discussed on page 53 of , the DEIS. Page 60 of the DEIS discusses the fact that crosswalks are available Y4and are currently used by junior high students at the Sprague Avenue and Appleway intersection. According to Central Valley School District, this , intersection meets all the State safety criteria for student crossings. The ~ appropriate hearing body could condition plat approval by requiring additional mitigation related to transportation impacts. See also responses to Letter No. 9, comment #24 and Letter No. 4, comments #1 and #2. 6. The additional traffic from development of the Turtle Creek plat does not - degrade the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Appleway to level of service F, since it is presently operating at LOS F. Given this present condition, impacts from the proposed development are required not to make the level of - service any worse. As discussed on pages 53 and 54 of the DEIS, a right turn lane on Sprague Avenue to accommodate those continuing on Sprague will meet this obligation. See also response to Letter No. 9, comment #25. t- ~ Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments :'C' : • 0 y~ . ;?-j . - ' r ~ ~ •r: T~ Y buffering in any sense of the word. This is not fill-in development as claimed by the deveIoper; a . short visit to the site will confirm this. 2. Built Environment c. Transportation ii. Vehicular traffic vi. Traffic hazards This area does not have urban levels of transportation services as required by the RCW. Most 5 prominently the roads in the area are not capable of safely handling the cars from 101 or more new houses. The proposed mitigations called for by the county do not come close to adequately ~ addressing the issue. School children in the area will not Ret adequate protection fvalking to andfrom scfiool especially along the route west on 8th, north on Long to Greenacres Elementary and further north on Long to Sprague and across Appleway at it's intersechion tivith Sprague. This route involves gradeschool through highschool students. Students in this area _ (with the exception of kindergarten students by special arrangement) must waIk to school. The required traffc study is seriously flawed and grossly underrepresents the impact of these 101 or more houses. Further, the traffic study only covers the AM and PM peak hours. These 'peak' hours only cover 20% of the trips made by the people who would live in these houses per expert ~ testimony given by Mr. Todd Whipple of Inland Pacific Engineering (co-author of this traffic study) at a previous hearing on this proposed development. Therefore the traffic study cannot be used to demonstrate that adequate protection is provided for children who only walk to and from school as required by RCW 58.17.110 (2) a. I challeng!~ the department of Building and ~ Planning to hold the developer accountable for demonstrah'ng that adequate protection is proi►ided for cliildren who only walk to and from school as required by RCW 58.17 11 0 (2)Q This protection does not just cover the crosswalk at Sprague and Appleway, it also covers the blind corner at 8th and Long and the blind corner at 6th and Long. . Barker Road does not have any provisions for pedestrian traffic. , 2. Built Environment " c. Transportation ~ ,-vi. Traffic hazards ! a. Impacts on the intersection of Sprague Ave. and Appleway Ave. There are no provisions for improving the intersection of Sprague and Appleway to an acceptable 6 level of service (that is a LOS better tharr F). The traffic study claims that no more than 5% of the trips into and out of this area will use the intersection of Sprague and Appleway. This is a very bad and biased estimate. All of the nearby services on Sprague (Grocery Stores, etc.) are most . quickly and logically accessed from the proposed development using the intersection of Sprague and Appleway. The traffic study admits that this intersection will degrade as the result of a the Turtle Creek proposed development but the degradation is underestimated badly. I challenge the , Spokane County Department of Building and Pianning to find that degrading the intersection of Appleway and Sprague without mitigation to a LOS of better than F is not in the public's best interest as required by RCW 58.17.110. Further the EIS needs to show . / . . . . j•~ '~i#• .~,'1')= ~ F~• - Response to Letter No. 11 (continued) . ; 7. See responses to Letter No. 9, comments #13 and #25. ~ 8. Greenacres Elementary is not completely full in every grade level. See also response to Letter No. 9, comment #67. Although not an enviable situation, _ often schools house more students than their maximum design capacity, as is L' ,~ry •the case at Greenacres Elementary. Therefore although the total enrollment at Greenacres Elementary currently exceeds its maximum design capacity, it still has limited space available in grades four and five. , . . ~ 9. The comments submitted are subjective in nature and are not supported by any ~ detailed information or facts. Spokane County Division of Utilities have . determined that the approved 8-inch line in Long Road will handle up to 700 R single-family residential units. See also response to Letter No. 5, comments #2 and #3. The appropriate hearing body could condition the project by restricting the number of lots approved for development if treatment plant capacity becomes a limiting factor in the future. . V-_-.' ~ . , Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments that any threat to the health and safety of the population caused by this development be rrutigated _ by the developer. The developer claims no responsibility for this intersection. This is in grave error. Without the sewer extension that this developer proposes to serve this proposed development, this area would see no significant growth. Therefore the developer is responsible for the degradution of this intersection , and should be.forced to midgate this intersection to an acceptable level of service (better than LOS F) as a precondition for this proposed t subdivision. Further it is my understanding that any intersection that degrades to level of service 7 . 'F' also requires that an air quality study be done due to the additional air pollution generated by the wa.iting cars. The EIS attempts to compare this intersection to the intersection of Mission and Pines. The EIS states that this is the worst intersection in the valley and it did passed the required air quality study. This is not good enough. This site is different, it has different terrain, it has ~ difFerent wind patterns and a.ir flow. I challenge the Spokane County Department of Building and Planning to require an air quality study be completed. , 2. Built Environment - d. Public Services iii. Schools Greenacres Elementary school is full. Greenacres'Elementary cannot be expanded due to a lack of $ core services capacity. The bond issue to build an elementary school at Liberty Lake has passed but the school there will not open until 1998. In a letter dated February 13th 1995 from Dave Jackman of the Central Valley School District, the school mitigation fees in place now "provide only a small portion of the cost of school facilities". Greenacres Jr. High is close to being at capacity now. Further, several dedelopments a!ready approved in already urban areas across I-90 from this site and far to the south of this site will likely absorb the elementary school capacity created by the new Liberty Lake Elementary school (as well as the huge already approved developments at Liberty Lake). Sufficient school capacity shouid be demonstrated be fore any . development is approved. 2. Built Environment d. Public Services r viii. Public Sevver ; This project involves a private extension of the sewer. This sewer capacity is needed and would 9 be consumed by sewering existing houses in the valley that have septic tanks over the aquifer. Allowing a developer to rob away needed (and under current technology irreplaceable) sewer ! capacity just so he can maximize his own profit is criminal. This developer and his associates have enough land holdings to generate much more effluent than the approved 8" pipe; he will be back ~ asking for more sewer capacity if this first urban density development is allowed. . 0;. . Response to Letter No. 12 . ~ Theresa L. Brown 1. See responses to Letter No. 11, comment #1 regarding impacts on wiidlife and Letter No. 9, comment #51 regarding concurrency of services. 2. By necessity, school age children typically walk to school on paved, local ~ access roads with 25 mile per hour speed limits throughout Spokane County. Improvements to 8th Avenue and Long Road will be completed as part of the ~ . proposed plat in accordance with County Division of Engineering design standards. Ownership of adjacent property to the south of the Turtle Creek site . is discussed on page 39 of the DEIS. 3. Issues involving parks and recreation are discussed in.Section 3.3 of the DEIS. See also response to Letter No. 9, comment #28 regarding the abandoned gravel pit. F-9 Turtle Creek Final E1S September 1996 Response to Comments ~-a ; ,"7'1 cn: t: ~ jy • <j LETTER NO. 12 FROM: Theresa Brown DATE: 26 February 1996 ; E. 18223 8t11 Ave ' Greenacres, WA 99016 ' TO: Spokane County Planning and RE: My written comments on the Environmental Building Department (MS-P) Impact Statement for proposed plat , 1026 West Broadway PE-1753-94 "Turtle Creek" : Spokane, WA 99260 attn.: John Pederson 1 am very concerned about several incorrect statements in the EIS for the Turtle Creek proposed ~ ~ subdivision. These include; traffic hazards for children that walk to and from school, shortage of . parks and places for the children to play, compatibility with existing land uses and impact to wildlife. I do not believe that any of these things have been studied enough and that they should all be studied and conected before this subdivision is approved. We live just to the north of the proposed subdivision across 8th Avenue. Greenacres is verv important to us. It is our home. Adding 101 houses will add a lot of traffic to our neighborhood. Paving 8th Avenue will also 2 result in people driving a lot faster than they do now. We have people driving much faster than the 25 mile per hour speed limit on 8th Avenue right now. This is true for a gravel road with lots of pot holes and bumps. If the developer is allowed to build these houses and paves 8th Avenue the people will drive much faster no matter what the speed limit signs say. Faster traffic is bad - enough, but faster traffic on 8th Avenue where the children have to walk to school is very bad. Because of the way the developer wants to build the sidewalks (on the south side of 8th Avenue and on the East side of Long Road) the children as young as b years old will have to cross the road in the middle of the blind corner where 8th Avenue turns into Long Road. This is a bad . corner. Two neighborhood children have already been hit in this corner on their way to school. This needs to be fixed. The EIS does not talk about this situation at all. You also need to know that this developer wants to build a lot more houses next to this Turtle Creek area, he already has . the land. ~ There are no parks close to our neighborhood. The nearest ones are Terrace View which must be 3 _ 5 miles away by the roads and the Sullivan park by the river at Sullivan Road. Neither of these parks is close enough for the children to get to easily. This is not a problem for my family; my two , children can play, in our large yard and our pastures. If these houses are built, the lots will be small . , and the children will look for another place to play. They will probably play in the "open space" in ~ this new development. The open space is a creek that is very dangerous right now because of the high runoff and the old dump on the east side of the Turtle Creek proposed development. The old dump is full of all sorts of sharp broken pieces of wood, rusty nails and who knows what else. Is ` this any sort of a place for children to play? If the developer is not forced to build a park close by, the creek and the old dump are where the children will play. F „ ' iiECEIVEI) -tiPOKANE COUNTy ~EE) j'' 8 )99Ei 34. s1V1s1L,,, guiwWG Awo P,c.uyNiW . ~'.~~tri= . •~t cc~ i . d Response to Letter No. 12 (continued) f4. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #17 regarding the project's consistency with adjacent land uses. The proposed project does not prevent the keeping of large animals on adjacent property. 5. See response to Letter No. 11 comment #1. The Saltese Creek drainage ditch - was formerly a natural stream that has been channelized. The ditch is periodically dredged and the water level is controlled by upstream irrigation . r gates. ~ Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments . - ' y r ' ' •v This proposed development does not belonix here in this neighborhood. We have had horses on 4 our property. Our children know what to do around horses, these new children wlio will live in what looks like a little piece of the city may not. On our street we all have 2 or 3 or 5 acres. We can see lots of stars at night. It is quiet most all the time. We look out for our neighbors. We have ; . a close neighborhood because we all know each other, but we all have our space. We like it this ' way, that is why we moved here years ago. We know that there will be more houses built, but we ' want to keep the good part of our neighborhood. That means houses on lots of 1 acre or more. It does not mean 4 houses on one acre along 8th Avenue like this developer wants to buiId. For these reasons and many more this development is not compatible with the existing land use. The - EIS says that this area is urban and that this proposed development fits, the EIS is wrong. All you , have to do is visit our neighborhood and you will understand why this proposed development ~ does not fit here. ~ The last thing I want to write about is the wildlife in our area. The two men with Ph.D. degrees ~j who wrote this part of the EIS say that the only animals that are found on the site are pheasants and quail. Even my nine year old daughter knows that this is not true. We see Canadian geese on this site every year in the fall and in the spring as well as ducks. We have seen deer by the creek. We have heard the coyotes down by the farm pond getting a drink. These animals would all be driven away from this area if these houses are allowed. In the EIS Saltese Creek is called 'Saltese Ditch". If you will look at all the old maps it is always called Saltese Creek not just a ditch. The land at this site is friendly to animals now, but it won't be if you allow these houses. In summary, the EIS does a very poor job of describing t_h_e real impact that these houses would ~ have if they are allowed. This is the view that the developer would like you to believe, but it is not the real view. Thank you for the opportunity to give my comments, ~ J 3 ~.~~i.. :.'v~.~ • ~ . nJ i.c.YL ~ ~ - \ Theresa L. Brown I ~ -r, . ~ . , ~Response to Letter No. 13 Bill and Mary Cabbage tf ~ 1. See responses to Letter No. 9, comments #171 #27, #44, and #51. 2. See response to Letter No, 11, comment #2. 3. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #66. 4 ~ . See response to Letter No. 9, comment #67 regarding schoois. Traffic hazards are discussed in Section 2.3 of the DEIS. 5. See response to Letter No. 11, comment #3. 6. Comments noted. At a public hearing, project proponents and opponents will have equal opportunity to present facts and provide comments to the appropriate hearing body for a decision subject to adopted policies and . regulations. F ' ✓b 4 Turt/e Creek Final E/S September 1996 Response to Comments , :x ~ 't * ~ j•~r~ f LETTER NO. 13 - ~ ,.~C2 /t.~~c.~it..~. C~ .e L~,~2,P ~ . c. ~ l f t-~r : ; '.c_ , • . ~ r . ~ ~ ~ ~ s 1 cL r~ . Gvt~C._._ ~ ..7 u`-'~ • f~,G~ ~f, T ~ G. , ~ ~._.,-,z, •L,~ ~ ~ ~ . -~~~n~u ,X iC.~ L. L•~ --r-l/L~C~'~- ~~-2s`-f..c ~~tL ~ Z G,z. yyu~ f' ! r _ L2A. (~7 ~LG~" - .~--1 Crt c:~ ~ ` ~ -d2.~~~.~ . 2 ..~2J`L•~ L ~ lit,.~(_,~,. ~Z.t..-~~ ~ . • • " . ' / ' ~ c...Z' 3 ,Vy al~-~ ~~e- 0~,~,~~ • ; v C~ Al- LM_ ~ . . p . . 4 (2 v L . IQ ~ ,~Cx,~-t~ CC.~CJ~ , . . J/E 5 . _ ; . . R. . . ~ • ✓ , ..G L _~'G~-J i' ,.~1--L'' ~ 6 . ~ f r• . . ~9 :'~.n+~ RS~ k. . 11r IC , . ( Response to Letter No. 13 (cont+nued) . ~,-7, The project is proposed for development in accordance with the existing County plans and development regufations. . - 8. See response to comment #6 above. . ~ ~ . ~ . , _ Tuit/e Creek Fina! E/S September 1996 Response to Comments . ~s'~ ' rY.r'r:'.t1 ~~T•^~t. , i~' ~ k • ' ~ - , ~ . . e4' - C ~ . - ~1 ~ 1 Z~~, •?~'~-,1.2~1 'LC~ ,~vf.'`7' . il/...'.'~' Lf X ~ yZ J'j~ . ~ J ~ ~ti~--~ -L• , n- ~c~~' t-~~C~ Z~ i- ~ - - " - ~ ~ 4:t ~ t, ' L , ~ a't;- -*")I 2 6z--I'L Le,7 . 9 -L . ~ G~ . • I~~~~V ~~JJ(~/ i r~~ ►vYL ~ I 1,5' 3 z ~ Ye- 7(o a cn1.a,~~?/~-e~ ~ - i€+f' Q~? ^~:~-:'S'L'c . . . 1r: . ^?te= : Response to Letter No. 14 - Linda Tasca 1. This summary statement of the project objectives and the op'ponents objections are noted. Subjective statements are subject to interpretation by the i appropriate hearing body. 2. See responses to Letter No. 9, comment #17 regarding consistency with - adjacent land uses and Letter No. 10, comment #4 regarding the demand for housing. 3. It is not the purpose of an environmental impact statement to find the most suitable site for a proposed development project, but rather to ana{yze the impacts and mitigations associated with the proposed development of a specific site. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Rules (WAC Chapter 197-11- 440(5)(d)) states "When a proposal is for a private project on a specific site, the lead agency shall be required to evaluate only the no-action alternative p(us ~-other reasonable alternatives for achieving the proposal's objective on the same r . site." SEPA goes on to state that "Further, alternative sites may be evafuated if other locations for the type of proposed use have not been included or considered in existing planning or zoniny documents." See also response to ~ Letter No.10, comment #4 regarding the demand for housing. I t . r9 • ( . ~ . h: t 1, ~ . ' . . t 1 Turf/e Cieek Final ElS September 1996 Response to Comments +~t . ~i.}•q.f, rr~-• `'i;,,:l, ~'Y•~~~ . f~,. LINDA R. TAS'CA LETTER NO. E. 18005 8th Ave. . Greenacres, WA 99016 February26, 1996 John Pederson RECEIVEq Spokane County Division of Building and Planrvng GPOKANE COt1NTY . 1026 West Broadway . Spokane, WA 99260 MaR 0 4 1996 Gentlemen, '3i1ilSlON oF SulLpNG pNp pLqNN1NC.'t 'Y- ~ I live at 18005 E. 8th Avenue, Greenacres WA. My home is directly across the street from the proposed site of the Turtle Creek subdivision. I have read the Draft Environmental Impact Statement prepare by Ramm and Associates for this project and take exception to many of the statements made in it. The DEIS at page S-1 states that this proposal is compatible with the surrounding 1 neighborhood, complies with the Comprehensive Plan, is needed to meet market demand in the area, minimizes off-site impacts, and provides an aesthetically pleasing environment that will enhance adjacent land uses. At page 9 the DEIS states that there is limited public benefit to delaying or precluding development of the project site. At page the DEIS states that the site is located in an area transitioning to urban use. All of these statements are incorrect. You need only drive to this site to see that the proposed development in not 2 consistent with the surrounding land use. This proposal represents a spot urban developrnent within a semi-rural/agricultural area. The surrounding land is not currently . transitioning to urban. The developer would like to see this happen and if this proposal is approved it will occur. However, without approval of this development this area will remain as it currently is, and as the existing property owners would like to see it remains. A drive through this area will also show that what currently exists in this area is a very nice transition from more urban development to the north, including commercial ~ development and dense urban use via trailer parks, through larger lot developments with large animal keeping to the existing agricultural use being made of the Turtle Creek site and all area to the south. There is existing housing opportunities for all income segments 3 with thin the greater Greenacres area. This development is not needed to meet the housing needs projected for Spokane County as a whole or for the Valley as a subset of . - : that market. Numerous other plats have been approved are homes are currently available that address the same market this development proposed to meet. These include some areas of Meadowwood at Liberty Lake just to the east, the Riverwalk development just to the north, and numerous development to the west along the Sullivan corridor. The Shelley Lake development also to the west will be available to meet future demand as well. ~ ^..v . 7. T Response to Letter No. 14 (continued) ~ tr,. 4. See responses to Letter No. 9, comments #27, #44, and #51. F..c~:• 5. The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) does not require the preparation of a cost-benefit analysis (WAC 197-11-450) and this type of analysis is not . included in the Turtle Creek DEIS. According to SEPA, "the environmental ; impact statement is not required to evaluate and document all of the possible 'effects and considerations of a decision orto contain the balancing judgements that must ultimately be made by the decision-makers" (WAC 197-11-448(1)). Some information is presented in the DEIS regarding estimated costs for traffic mitigation in the study area (Table 10 of the DEIS) and estimated property tax ~ revenue generated at full build-out (Table 13 of the DEIS). The project proponent and other area developers will pay all of the costs'to provide sewer to the area, as well as required improvements to the transportation system. ' The County will be financially responsible for maintenance and upkeep of the . completed facilities. The planned sewer lines in Long Road and 8th Avenue are being installed in order to serve already approved plats. See also response to Letter No. 9, comment #27. , a. 6. See responses to Letter No. 10, comment #4 and commenis #3 and #4 above. ' ~ 7. See response to Letter No. 13, commen-L #fi. i_ 8. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #13. . FM . . 'Y Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments '^.~-Ct^t• 7~•'9F. 1„ . . !t > ~4. .y~ Approval of this developnient is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the 4 Growth Management Act or RCNA' 58.17.1 10. This development does not represent fill in ~ development as defined by the Comprehensive Plan nor does it represent an orderly and contiguous pattern of development. The DEIS clearly shows that the urban services ' r necessary _ to support the development are not currently in place and even with the mitigation proposed by the developer adequate provision can not be made for school, - parks and recreation, and playgrounds. Sewer is availabie onl_y because the developer proposes to bring it to this area. This site is well outside the area the county has identified as the area of primary concern where it wants to utilize its sewering resources. Roads in the area will have to be upgraded if this project is approved. Wh.ile the developer will pay a portion of this cost the rest will fall to the county which will be forced to divert ~ resources from other areas were they are currently planned to be utilized. There are no road improves planned by the county in this area if this project is approved county resources will have to be diverted from areas the county has determined they are more needed. Although this area is outside the area the county wants to see sewer, under current financing arrangements county would have no choice but to pay part of the sewering cost diverting money that could be better used elsewhere. This project does not 6 meet the requirements of RCW 58.17.110. As indicated above this project is not needed to meet the housine demand generated by the OFM population projection for the nexf 20 years. The site is located on the very edge of the 100 year Urban Impact Area identified by the 1981 Comprehensive Plan. It is not in an-existing urban area and not currently served by urban services. Adequate land that meets these two criteria is available. , Approval of this project is therefore contrary to the spirit, intent and legal language of the Growth Management Act. As indicated above there is clearly significant public benefit to be gained by 7 delaying or precluding development of the project site. Scarce county resources will not " be diverted from areas where they are more needed, actively farmed agricultural land will , not be diverted to urban sprawl, the current overcrowding at area schools and shortages . . in existing parks and playgrounds will not be exacerbated, the understaffed county sheriffs department will not be stretched even thinner, the on-site wetland will not be threatened by urban encroachment, resting grounds for transitory birds and habitat for year round ~ wildlife will not be decreased, the incentive for additional urban encroachment on open agricultural land to the south would not be provided, the life style enjoyed by current area . residents would not be destroyed. . , In addition to these broader statement with which I take issue there are a number of technical shortcoming in the DEIS that should be addressed. First, no Air Quality Conformance Study has been done. Both the Federal and State Clean Air Acts reauired that a study be done for any impacted intersection currently at or expected to go below a LOS of C. Reliance on an acceptable finding at an unrelated intersection outside the area is unacceptable. Each intersection has its own traffic flow characteristics and must be _ , looked at independently. Air Quality Studies must be completed prior to the final EIS being acceptable. a . ~ • 'r1L (:•t7'.; • Response to Letter No. 14 (continued) 4. 9. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #40. 10. As discussed in section 2.2 of the DEtS, Barker Road is designated as a principal arterial by the County Arterial Road Plan. Arterial classifications . outlined in the Spokane County Road Standards or the 1994 AASHTO "Green , Book" recognize the functional rather than the physical characteristics of a road. Barker Road has two lanes and unpaved shoulders and it functions as a major arterial. A"major collector arterial," as defined in the Spokane County , _ Road Standards, is a"route which (1) serves county seats on arterial routes, - larger towns not directly served by the higher systems, and other important . traffic generators, such as consolidated schools, shipping points, county parks, . - and important mining and agricultural area; (2) links these places _with nearby larger towns or cities, or with routes of higher classification; and (3) serves the more important intracounty travel corridors." As a two lane facility, Barker Road is capable of accommodating the additional traffic from development of the Turtle Creek plat. See also responses to Letter No. 3, cornment #1 and comment #5 above. . 11. The comment is subjective in nature since no documentation or statistical . analysis is provided to support the stated conclusion. 12. See responses to Letter No. 4, comment #3 and Letter No. 9, comments #25 , and #51. . ; ~ • J•: C,'.~,,(Oj+LJ^,+i: i~~Av~'J' jr : ^ . . I r ~ :•'~~~T . . , . • 1 V i • f. Turt/e Creek Fina/ E/S September 1996 Response to Comments . j'• ' • 'r i N .R i. • . •~i:i. The DEIS references compliance of the plat with Critical Area Ordinances. The county is 9 . in the process of adopting a new Critical Area Ordinance. Since the new Ordinance will be adopted prior to the Final EIS being prepared the project should be reviewed to assure that the project complies with the wetland buffers and other wetland criteria required by the new ordinance. f'~= .1:1- 1 Y ti} The DEIS continually refers to Barker Road as a major arterial. Barker Road is currently 10 a relatively narrow 21and road with no shoulder or sidewalk and with numerous homes having driveways that directly access it. If Barker is to be analyzed as a major arterial . -`L (note: this is one of the justification used in several places to support this and other proposed development) then the money required to upgrade it to meet the standards of a _ L„ major arterial should be a part of the DEIS cost analysis. . l~ . Based on the driving patterns of myself and my neighbors that live on and or utilize 8th 11 avenue the impact of the Turtle Creek development on the intersection at Appleway and Sprague is understated. I question the "field observations" used to conclude that 95% of the AM traffic would utilize the 8th AvenueBarker route and only 5% the 8th Avenue/Long route. This DEIS looks at a much broader scope than just the Turtle Creek development. It 12 reviews the overall impact on the area if all proposed and anticipated development were allowed to occur. I commend the County Building and Planning Department for taking i - this big P cture view of the imPacts of aPProving this develoPment. It is onlY bY looking at 3 - the "big picture" that the true environmental impacts of projects can truly be judged. However, the proponent has used this bigger view in deternvning what of-site road . improvement costs should be assessed to this project. That is inappropriate. Some of the projects included in the proponents analysis have already been approved. No fees similar to that proposed have been assessed those developments. Therefore they can not be . charged as proposed by this DEIS. Other projects may or may not be approved thus their . impact and contribution to the improvements needed can not be counted on. Road improvements must be made to support this development. Current roads are inadequate to handle dense urban population such as that proposed. These improvement will be ~ necessary at this point in time due to this development therefore this development should be responsible for their cost. Each proposal must show that services including roads are adequate before the project can be approved. The Turtle Creek development can not abrogate this obligation by proposing that they be responsible only for that share of the - cost that equates to their proportion of some unknown future population growth. . f ~6 ~ • , j~'. • ,•~t ~L~`~K Thank you for your time and consideration. , ti;: ~.;.~,a • •4-i' J,C ~ ~ Sincerely, Linda R. Tasca 'S` ">f.7'.t~T~:r~• rrti!,..+y ;~~i~` 4~ ik~:- • ' . 'i^ . ♦ . 'Response to Letter No. 15 April Taylor 1. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #3. t t • , 2. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #28 regarding the abandoned gravel pit. - 3. Comments noted. At a public hearing project proponents and opponents wiil have equal opportunity to present facts and provide comments to the ~ appropriate hearing body for a decision subject to adopted policies and regulations. . 4. See response to #3 above. The appropriate hearing body could condition the plat to require redesign to add additional buffers or open space corridors. 5. See response to Letter No. 9, comments #40 and #50. The DEIS indicates that the project is located within the existing UTA boundary but does not use this -fact as a rational basis for support of the proposed project. Project approval will be determined by the appropriate hearing body in accordance with the rules . and regulations in effect at the time the preliminary plat application was accepted. by Spokane County. - . 6. See response to L-uttei No. 11, comment #1. ' 7. On page 18 the DEIS states that „the amount of fertilizers and pest/weed control chemical products applied to the landscaped areas of the site are expected to be about the same as those currently applied during agricultural production." See also response to Letter No. .9, comment #33. 8. As a result of the Environmental Protection Agency's designation of the F9 Spokane-Rathdrum aquifer as a sole source aquifer, concern has intensified about the provision of proper wastewater disposal within its boundary. The 208 Spokane Aquifer Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan) was developed by the County to assess potential water quality threats to the aquifer. Its findings were that sanitary sewage is a potential contributor of MrJt}~', 3 pollutants to unsewered areas above the aquifer. As a result, it was recommended that a general sewage plan be developed for the area and that boundaries for a Priority Sewer Service Area be established. Collection and : . . treatment of all sewage within urbanizing areas was stressed with early emphasis given to the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). The County's _ _-Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan was completed in 1981 as a direct result of 208 Plan recommendations. The Wastewater Management Plan ~ Turt/e Creek Final ElS September 1996 ~r. ' Response to Comments "':M: '"'.!IY: \ t•~•fn ~ . f.ir lunda%, 1Lrrh uJ. 1u,.0::,L1::.. P\) T..; .I•-uu Yrtirrs- LETTER N4. .~ECjj, vE , L, . . Ap-ri 1 Ta yl or . ~ 19921 E. SiVtlr.4ve. Greeliacres H.A. 99016 (509) 922-4105 h >>U9) 928-3918~' jr.~ . - Jolvi Pztzrsc~n . Spokane County Platuiine Dzpartmznt 1026 W. Bi-oadWav . Spokanz. W_A. 99206 ~ RE: PE-1753-94 Monday, vlarch -4. 1996 . l._. Dcar Mr. Pcterson. ~ I bzlievz tliis proposal. Tw-tle C,-zeh. iii additioll tc.~ N-Ir. Da1llI1'S Otl1ZI' dZvZIop1IlZt]tS lil CIlZ . area: Morningside Heiehts and 1-1orningside. Nvill cause sig»i.ficant adverse impacts on the enViroiviiznt of our community. '1'he mitigation proposzd in rhe llraft Enviroivnzntal Impact Statetnent do not relie\,e tliz problenis this developmeni .vill cause. I liave some serious concerns ahotlt tliz co»Yents of tlie gravel pit oil Bai-ker Rd. as it is dzsiQiiatzd opeii space iil thz plaii. Tlle 2 gravel pit ic opzn as a"passive rzcrzation" area. Tliz real estatz laws require people ro bt ' iiifornlzd of hazards nzar thzir homzs. Buildzrs aiid rzal zstatz agznts won't k-jiow if there arz . hazards iii t}la pit if tlobody shidizs it. . Tliz no actioil altzrnativz will provide iilanv beiletits iilcludiilg: rztentioil of vvildlife. 3 ` I2181I1tZI18I1CZ Of Nvatzr qualiny. preszrvation of aericultural lailds and na conflict witli existinQ niral lifzsfiti•les. NzgativZ 1111paCtS \\'lll IlOt I1ZZd t0 hZ I111t1Q,11Zd. lIlC1LldlTlg: lllCfeaSZd dZIIl81ld Oll _ already ovzrtated puhtic szrviczs, includiiig schools and parks. traffic flow down the Barker carridor aild resulting deQradatioii at tlie aii- qliality eiljovzd iii the area. aild reduced incenti<<e for .,.~1 furtllzr urbail sprawl. • ' The low dznsin- alrznlarive is alco appzaling. It would pravide a variety of housicig as 4 required by the GMA. The Act encourages ne-tv plans and Dalvn Developmeiit could create a verv ariractivc: COllll]lUlllh• oii illis land. Cltistcr liousing cail allo«+ opcn corridors for wildlife to coiitiiitie tu use tlle ai-ea. Tlizi-z is iiotliing iii tlie law tliat przvziits a devzloper from includi»g - oPen spacz i» largz lot devzloPme»ts. '1'llz proposzd dz~~zlopmznt is iiot acczptablz in tllis area. '1'lierz is ilo justiticatioii to s continue to approve subdi`•isions based on an L1I A dzfinzd in 1980, designed for 100 vears of ~ . . - growtli. wheil iiloi-e recetit iiifornlation iiidicates it is iilappropriate A glarilig omission in the DEIS is a shidy of wildlifz. This arza is in the Pacific Flyway 6 and reillovilig a sourcz of food for tlizsz ailimals will jeopardize tlleir survival. Ttlere are alsa , deer and other largz anitnals, and xvhile tloiie of tlieitl aiidangerad this kind of disregard for thzir . habitat mav lead them to hzcoming endangered. In thz water quality quantin• sectio» I question rhe facnial basis for the statement tltat the amotint of pesticides aiid fzrtilizers applied to tlie site arz expzcted to be much less tllail those •,::~~.:'~=n . ~ , . przviously applied duriclg aericulhtral productioii. Homemvnzrs are icifamous for puttiilg largz ; amounts of chemicals on their landscapzs. Fanuzrs havz to lnake a living and aren't 'Wastefiil. ''.Thz DEIS assumzs Septic sVStziil~ \Vill pOllute lhz ayuifer. A szptic s_ystem wuuld ha<<z a . SIIlaI1ZI' 1I11p1CY YI11Y 1II tllZ t011t1s C1ITlZd 11v CCOI'il1 \VatZ1' dTa1111ge ~,leCallSZ SClI21z Qf tllZ tOVI1C d011'i . . . hiodeerade. . . Y, ' e ~l~-r%'. a 4 • i. ;u,.• ~T..•, i . T r . L iResponse to Letter No. 15 (continued) establishes PSSA as well as Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) boundaries. The project site is located within both the PSSA and ASA boundaries and is therefore subject to provisions of Section 10 Water Quality of the County r Comprehensive Plan. The goals and objectives of this section relate to "No . further degradation of the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer" and provides decision guidelines for conditioning projects over this and other . r' aquifers. Specifically, decision guideline 10.1.6 states that "New Urban- and , Suburban-type developments within the adopted sewer service areas, ~ dependent upon location, shall be conditioned to require immediate connection , to sewers, or if sewers are not available a) installation of an approved sewage disposal method with double plumbing. and continues with obligations to ; financially and/or physically provide for sewering when available in the future. The existing County plans, policies, and regulations all support provision of sewer systems for new developments. Pages 18, 19, and 20 of the DEIS discuss potential water quality impacts and mitigation measures regarding stormwater run-off. See also response to Letter No. 6, comment #1. 9. Impacts concerning groundwater and/or aquifer recharge were not identified in the Final Scoping Notice.(see Appendix A) and were not analyzed or discussed in the Turtle Creek DEIS. - 10. Based upon the stormwater management guidelines for Spokane County, all current regulations as well as conditions applied to the project during the preliminary plat approval process will be followed (see also response to Letter No. 6, comment #1). At this time, analysis with frozen ground, or 100 percent ' impervious conditions, is not required. , 11. As stated on pages 72 and 73 of the DEIS, "the DEIS for Morningside Heights - PUD is incorporated by reference into the DEIS for Turtle Creek." The ~ Morningside Heights DEIS provides a discussion concerning existing capacity at. the Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant, as well as future options for handling increased sewage due to long-term growth within the County. ~.F.: . 12. Please see response to Letter No. 9, commen.t #24. ~~-13. See responses to Letter No. 9, comment #66 and Letter No. 14, comment #5. 14. See response to Letter No. 9, comment #67. . . 15. See responses to Letter No. 13, comment #6 and Letter No. 9, comment #51. - t:.,,-•r• Turtle Creek Final E/S September 1996 " Response to Comments •.w.:~.y.,._ j, • - - • • • . . . . ....u... \.r:b • . i'e _.w:_'~'\l i. ,f•hn '..irr,:.i. , .a , : Thz logic of assuilliiig local aytiifzrs will bz rzchai-eed by sLirface watzr more rapidly 9 . whZIl tllZ VVStZT IS I114v111Q lU t1111ZS fclStZi' 1S I111'd t0 COlllpl'ZI1Z11Ci. TI1ZT'Z w1II bZ SOIIIZ 1I1f1lYI'at10I] lIl 1I1e SlUTT21 wateI' CUIIlI'Ul dZVISeS, bllt lhZy 1ld\'e wdlel' lI] lllelil UIIIy whe11 11 I"alllti UT SIlU\v5. dIld . > tliic is ati arid rzgioil. Landseapz irrigation \vill not prociliez eiiotlgh water infiltration to make uP ..~~d for the incrzase in impznnzable surfaczs. Pzoplz usuaily usz enough «rater to kzep plants healthy. . Absorption and trailspiratioli kccp thc iilfiltratioil rarc vcry lo~\.-. Data oti frozeii coiiditiolis slioLild bz loc.~l:ed at tliis acea oftzn has Chinook «ritids wlizil tlie 10 . ~mtind is frozen. ~ Tllz llEIS did not address the liiYiits on tlie szwagz treatineni plaiit's capacitv. 11 ' At rio point iil tllis sui2imarv of traiisportation iiiipacts is tlie widerung of Barker road to the - 4 lanzs reqtiirzd for priiiciple arterial desigiiatioti addressed. 1 2 L The detiiaiid far public szrviczs will begiii Nvith tliz first hausz. A tluesliold svsretll for tllz 13 ~ improvement of public szrvices is uncertain. Wllo IS responsible for rhz improvements'? I fear lawyers mav make lots of tllaney on tliis svsiziii. Thz tat table should sho«• the tates iiicrzinentallv: b~? vear, starting witll 1998. Tllz impacts occur gradually aild so will tax reveilue. Thz taxes collected fronl iiidividual liouseholds rarely pay ziiougli tax Yo pay for the sentices tlie . occupants use. . . V<<e Nvzrz fortunatz to havz thz latest school boiid atid levy approved by the voters. Wz 14 \vill llavc a 600 studeiit elcmciltary scliool in Libcrtv Lakc. Uiifortuliatclv lots already approvcd. Slielly Lake, Monliiigsidz, Meado\vview Rancli Estatzs aild dzvelopiTiziits iei Liberty Lake. will fill thz schools to caPaciri..' "fhe list of urban ser\rices in this proposal is niore than what most people in the area want. 15 RCW 36.70A.010 states: "Tlle lzgislahit-e tiiids tliat uncoordiiiated and unplatuied growt11. togetlier with a lack of common goals etprzssing the public's interest ~l fllz couservation aild the r wise use of our latids, posz a tluzat to tlle enviroiviizilt. stistainable economic developmznt. aiid - tllz l1Z2I1Il, safety, and liigli quality of life ei~io\'zd by residelits of this sYafe. It is iti tlie public iriterest that citizens, commuiiities, local govznuneirts. and the private sector cooperate and coordinate with one anotlizr in comprzheilsivz laild use platulitlg." Sincerzly. . ' : .april Taylor ~ ~ . R i e•:'~'- • ti" . • • ~ ' ' r~- ~ ~ , ~ j:~ .~~;..l. ` ~ , t^-'4;. ' ' ' "7 • Y ' _ . ' `i. ' " r=, " -"~r r ~ , - ~ M f . ~ r„•~^-! ` - 'f- y - ' ' _ l , ~ • , • _ • ~ , n r r s , • w 'c , ~„t ' i' ` t . ~ ~ `ii"-'` • ` • ~ _ ~ . - ; ~ • r _ , ~ . ! • ~ - ~ ; ~ , , I- ~ ~ , / ~ ~ ~ a--~'} • • . ~ ~ t , 2~`" ' ~ • ~,1 , ^ t.. r ' . " . ~ ~ , , . . K ~ ~ . . . 7 f' , ! ' ~-r~ • ~K ~ ~-j"` •.f ' . ~ - ~ ' ~ _ " - - . ~ _ - - ~ • /'L ~ 'i, ' . ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ i . . . 5 J r ' . : •t • 1 • + p r . e~.... ~ . ~ r ~ ~ :.'r ' ~ _ • _ ` ~ ' • ~ I J~ ' _ ' I . J y• _ . ~ ^ ~ , ~l..i. _ _ . . I _ - . i ~ a. • _ . , ~ j ~ i 4 . J w ' - _ " ~ tt~"'>l'S , ~ . ~ . , ~ f - - ' ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' ` ~ . , ' _ = t Z ~ ~ j ' . ~ " ; , - . ? . • t . - ~ . . . ° : '`-ti--- • . _ • i``" i ' , • • ' ` f/ N~ t- ~ r= J~.' - = .r ? l-.,~. _ " n.., . ',r~` ~ i, • f ~.y~ - . j' • . ~ i ' , . . - . 1 ` ~ v ~ y - I' Y `i~ . , "S'' , e_ ~ . - . Y ' y_ " ' ` ' \ ` • ' ` , ' _ . . ' ~ ' "y. _ " . ; 1' i . t.: ' ~ - ' ~ . ~ ~ i ` . . • ` " ~ . ~ ; ' : ~ ~ .1 { j~'r ~ . . ~ s . • _ . ~ ~ , `~.w ;..y , t~~ ' ° y ' ~ - "A ' ~ ~ - . - - • ` ` ! , ' . - r . _ : ' ' w, _ _ ' ~ } ~ j r ' .~--"~r ~ ' , 't.~~ ~ ` 3~ • ' ' \ ' ' .l_ l-.. • - ~ - ` • , ' , _.r.-, - • '"`a..'^.L f, • _ ' • ~.y;» ~ ~ ' r' ~ ? ' , • i 'y . _ •vi • "t . _ . ~ f ~ _ ? ~ . • ~ ~ ~ r 'L. ~ ~ > I . , _ . S , ' . Y . ' . ~ ~ ~ : . 1- ti ~ _ , j y,~ . a ; y ~ ^ . e. ~ . ! . ' • ~F=.~ . ~ . ~ . ` . • ~ . - . , ~ ! ^ ~ ~ ' " . ` ' ~ . ' f T' ;iJ ' ' n ' f ` • ~`vt . 5...~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ` ! ; _ s ~ r.!' 1' . -.~i ~ a ~ : f ~ ` . - ' = - ~ ~ • ~ ~ j.-. ` ' _ ' ' \ . _ - ' ' :~.4~1.'_ ~ y' ' r. t.~ . 9'~ ' . j ~ ~ -~„-`r:_+ ~ ' " ' ' ' ^ • . , f k'„ ~ n ~ - z ' s " a~ 1. ".C / ~ f~~ ' ^ ,/c " x'!_ ~ • ~ ,l ~ r t- \ i " .J- .i f • .S•t ' P ~ f' " rt,t ..J.. . ' ~`4 L JL_ _ • ~ f/ - ' ' ~~t J-.. ...r _..1 ^ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ •'Y'~ ~ • ~ . I :5` . Z,.,/ 1~^y ~ ' '_..~.,d ~ Y1~~ ^r ~ " 3,'I .~-,}t ~ ~ CE ' ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ,1 ~ , 'j ^ ; ~i ~ ' ~ ' ~ ' i ~ t ' ' ~'~fYi F~ ~ , ~ ' ~ . ~ ° , j ~ 7 ~ ~'.1 - ~ . ~r ~ ~i ~ 4 '-'~Y ~ ' ~ i. . r - i / • , ~a ' • r~ . " ~ \ . • , y ~ '-r`' ~ ' ` /y ~'i' y ! ' i f a • / , ~ t ~r 4~ ~1`'. ~F.x' ~ r~% {_L 1 „ ',h,` _ 1 ,y -b~ ` , 7 ° -y~__' ~ , • ~ " ~ . _.4 ~4 `'s, r • ' ~ "r•• , ' ~ ` ' T 'f ~ . ` t~~ ' ' / , 1 + _ ` s-~ 1 ' ' ' ~ ' d Separa ~ ~ J •t' i : ..1 { i7~ •tr ~ l " . f.~ t t~ ? iC ln No` _for- ~ ation ~'ry 9 in. 1 ~ ,~~~r ~ ~f.;. r_, . . opin , _ ~ , ~ . ± . y ~ _ . ~ : . ~ Sc. S fta al v , l t, Tran po'ev~rer ~lnf~'Cm`. iona ,Add~ ~~P~bi►c :S _ - , X daitiona, Apperici~ d,X . V . • ~ i~^-~.- ~~v ~ ' ~v . f t~. ~ ~ J~ r ~ . L' % ~ ~ ` =,6 u , i.-. ~ ~ ~ • ` e~ ~s, ~ , 1 - - . ` .7.. ~ - - t~ - ~ ~ . - y . ~ _ . , . ' , ~.t~ ~ ' ~ . Z~ ~ ~ 1• ~_f f, ~ ~ ~ `k ~ l, , . % ~ . ! ~ ~ w r f~.`, r , . ' " ..~!•'r-r~ f- ' - ?:~f-, t. - r`` ' % 'y., . . ~ :f t._ , i'' fs. ~ i ~ 4"~ _ •f,i ~ ~ / - l ~t r- ~ . J ~ +i ~ k J f t t~'_•}. . ~ ` . ' S ~ t'' , r "Y - . ~ . • ~f • , . 1 14 r''' \ i - ' ~ ' • . . ~ ^Y' % ` ( f ~ ~t , t ~ , f ~ - i-r ~ j ~ j S.~ , / ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , _ +,y 4 J , ~ ~ ` ' " ~ • 1 ' . ~t'' t~~ . ` ' Y ~ ~ L_-. . t . ~~c, f • . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ .,j \ ` rSj'~ . / , . 1 • . . ~Y. _ , ~ ~ b i i ~ ~ 1 , • - t t' . J • J ; a~ [ r,~ : u' , . O ' ' - . ~ 1 , • } ~ ~ - ~ • ~ , ' ~ / f J '\t` ~ ~ ` f S ~ ` , , . _ ' ~ r, , . ~ ~ ; ~ , - ~ ~ w` ~ ' -.i,r.- t/ r' • ~ , ..1;~~ , t. ~I ' .l `•".r ti'.~~ ' ' ' ~ ~ , , , 7,,c; ~ _ f j ~4 , . ~ ~l~-~. F`" - t~=.,~, ~'7 • r _ ~ 'J , . ~..i - 'a~:~' ~ ' - .,y'` ~ ' i `'.:t < . . ~ ~ ` ' ,L' ~ • ~'1 > . , i ~ ~ ° ~ f y •1 - . ' ( S. \ " ' ~ l ~ ~ D" ~ 1 , ' ~ • - ~ ~ f ' 1 , y~i ' ~ - ~ '3 - ' .r-• ` • " . ~ - : ~ ~ : . ~ i ` tit• , _ ;-t. ~ . . . , , _ . : . ; . ' - _ _ f t . ~ . ~ ' ~ ~ _ , _ T~~ t ~ - ~ - _ "r ~Y1, i ` \ ~'~1 . ~ C ;7• , ~.i ~ , ~ . • - ~ - ` - ' ~ , ' ~ - , ' , J _ Z . : : . • 4 - • . 4 ~ } _ ._v 1, ~ .~,;w ~ ~-"t - i ~~',,,~4-.'• ~ ~ ! ~ , 1 r_ ~ ` L ` L~• _ , ~ ' , 4 „ I ~ ~ ti ~ 4+ 1~ • ~ 2 i''~-^, . ,i, l~: 1 f • ~7 _ , f s ? ~ J/ f ~i=ly,~' ~'l ~l'rT. / .l,;~ ' i ^J ~ , ~%tt~ t ~ • _ ~t. . • t ~ , ~ • ~`y~ ~ / ~ .1 . ~ ~ , - ~'~L ` ~ ~'iw . ~ . i + ~ ~ - , d ` , ~ ~ . . . _r t ` ~ ~4 ~ /'}~f, f`- ~ ' • `.t ~ ~ _ - .i . A-T r" ~i i--. f ~ .f' . ~ ' • . , . ~yJ\ '~a , . ~ _ ~J , / _ ' i • ~ . 1, 4 , ~ 4 ~ '1 , ` r , . ! • • c` `J ' . - ' ' ~ ~ , ' ~ JJ •I " 5 p+ . ty . , / ~ . - l ~ : . , t ~ ~ .v ' ~ ~ 1 41' • • ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S . i ~ 1 ~ Y ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ , ~ . _ ` r ~ ~ / . r' ~ 1 ~ . ' '~..J ~ .r_/ r ' • i ' .~t ' ~ t - _ ' , ' _ . i -~~'c . . { ~i . ~ ,4 S , . ' . . , ; ~ ~ i , / . ti • ~ ~ K`. -~,"J ' ~ l';" . ~ . ~ . , i ` • 'r 1 _ • 1 • , . ~ - . ~r ,-,J.~ • t,, .,_'J ' ' ~ , i . M ' r . r - r f ~ t~ - ` ~ r i ` ~ ~ , `s ~ ' . ~J f ' ` - • •5 '`+y ~ ; t.- ~ ' -S~ Z I,4 i.: ~ .'1 ' ' r~J ' ; ~ l ~ . ' , •1 . : . . ~ -.J ~ _ `r•.1° ~ J' L ~r y ~ ~ \ i` '•,r , • ^ l ~ ~ • F ~r - , . 'j ti yr'.~ l . - _ , ~ • ~ . . • ~ , "i._ I . • - . ~ . ' ' , : ~ . iC„ _ . . Y . , ~ , , ~ ~i , ~ ` _ ~ _ . ' ~ , `l . ~ ~S . • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . • j ~ , • " , ~ } / ~ • t ; " " ; ~ _ _ _ " , ' _ ~'t ✓ ~ , f r ~ " ~ ` ~ ~ ~ y e ~ . 1 ' ~ _ ~ , M; . ~ ' ` ~ ( ~ ' ' t • - •t ~ ' ,.1..- ' . ' r ~ _ . ~ ; , ' ' . ~ _ , ~ , ~ 1 ' - ' . t ! • , : , . ~ ~ ' . ` , t . 1 \ ~ ' • . • v / , ~ . ! - _ { ' ~ / Y' ~ ' .~;~r ~ ~ . • ~ . . ~ 'r ' ' _ ~ , . - . \f''~..~,,, . ~ %'i ' . ~ , y ^ ~ ~ , ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ° ~ . a r f - ^ ~ _ - . J ✓ ~ ~ + ~ L ~ ~ .'t- , - i' , ~.1~ . p"'"„^~'. • , _ y ' , , ' , • • ;M.'~ ~ "6 , ~ ~ . : ' i ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ti " ~ -',ti tr . ~ ' , ' , r` _ . . . ~ ~ i~. . - • y ~1 , ~ , i • ~ \ ~ ' . • + \ ' ♦ ~ 1.i ~'y".' t . t e r ~ • . ` . ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . • ` . ~ ' ~;1~~ Y . ~ . _ . ~ Z / , ~ ' i t ) . ~ ~ t ';.i' . ' `r'~ r`~ ' ` , ~ ' . - ° ` .1 ' ~ y/~'~-. ~ + 7 . , 1 \ ~ / ' . . _ ' f f , ~ ~ • ` , ~ ~ ` ~ r ` :J~ . ~ `,I ^ 1 f ' ' ~ ~ ~ 1 r + . _ •y • - ~ ' • • 1 - ~ ~ . _ , l ..l..~ r` ~ : j • _ 1. ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ .l~ ~ ¢ ~ . . ` . ~ ~ ; ! . ~ , . f ~ , 1. ~ ~ ' , . . ! ~ \ . . y " i - . I ~ ~ , ...r " ~ .t ( ~"i, ' ! ~ - f` ~ J 1 • . ' " ~ fr ; . ` ` ~ . • ~ , ~ . l • . ! ~ ~ J _ i~ - : ! , / ~ - ' - y ^ , ^ ~ 'i' ~ ' ° _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' J ' r ' ! . ~ " . - ' ~ • .w . . ~ ~ ~ t w 1 ' ~ r VX . . r`; r • . " _ . , . . , ~ ` . , ' . . y~ • _ • - " , . % 1 _ . , _ ` ~ ✓'r ~ , - ' . . ~ . ' • t . ~ ,FJ ' • - ~ F _ ` ' ' ~ = . ' . . _ . ~S _ y, ^ ~ . • / ! . ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ ' . . . :,,'e: ' ll`-~✓?: C~ • • r • ~ I i Appendix A ~ Fina/ Scoping No tice ~ ~ I ~ ~ , , ~ l 1 • ' ~s ~ • .f ` , ~f~J -i ! - ~ ~ .c•• • . - • . ' • ~ 4:. . ~ FINAL SCOPING NOTICE . TURTLE CREEK PRELIMINARY PLAT ~ I ~ The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning issued a s . ~ Determination of Significance (DS) and request for comments on the scope for the Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat on August 10, 1995 to zecei.ve comments on issues to be discussed in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will be prepared for the project. The scoping/comment period ended on August 31, 1995. Six (6) comment letters were received. The Spokane County Division of Building and Planning has reviewed all the comments received. The scope of the EIS has been modified to reflect the comments received. Comments received are primarily concerned with wetlands, air quality, public services, transportation, agricultural lands, cumulative land uses, and consistency with the Growth Management Act. ; As of the time of this notice, the subject property is located in the Urban ~ category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA). Spokane County is now planning ' under the full requirements of the Growth Management Act. However, j countywide goals and plans pertaining to and implelnenting the Growth . Management Act have yet to be adopted. ' A copy of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Table of Contents is enclosed/attached. The Table of Contents may be reorganized , and some additions may be made during preparation of the Draft - Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The Division of Building and . o : ~ y, Planning maintains responsibility for interpreting the language in this final . - - - . scoping notice. . . . • ~ ' ' ; , S : . 1 1 : r~ . • . ~ . . " . '~•,j,. ,a , , FINAL SCOPING NOTICE TURTLE CREEK PRELIMINARY PLAT • : . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (E1S) TABLE OF C4NTENTS wJ Cover Letter from Lead Agency Fact Sheet Table of Contents List of Maps and Figures List of Elements of the Environment ( ~ Project Summary • Altematives I Proposed Action/Include Project Phasing II Reasonable Alternatives ~ A. Development Under Existing Zoning B. No Action ~ . I Affected Environment, Significant Impacts and Mitigating MeasUres ' I Natural Environment ( A. Earth . 1. Soils - impact on adjacent primelunique soils B . Air quality . C. Water Quality/Quantiry ~ { 1. Surface Water Movement/QualityiQuantity a. Lnpact to wetlands on or adjacent to the site , - II Built Environment , A. Land Use . 1. Relationship to existing land use plans and surrounding development and ' impacts of the proposal on Spokane County requirements to plan under . Chapter 36.70A Growth Management Act 2. Relationship to existing and proposed land uses - cumulative impacts of these . . B . Transportacion ~ 1. Vehicular Traffic , 2. Transportation Systems . a. Arterial Road Plan 3. Traffic Hazards ' a. Impacts on intersecdon of Sprague Avenue and Appleway Avenue . C. Public Services and Utilities ~ 1. Schools ' a. Impacts to Greenacres and Sunrise Elementary Schools b. Adequacy of voluntary mitigation fees ~ . `~~`"°4' c. Alternadve to voluntary mitigation fees . ' ' d. Capaciry/deficiency analysis/bussing impacts . . . ~ 2. Public Sewer . .r..:.. ,a. a. Impacts of sewer extension which may promote future development ~ ' b. Sewer system capacity analysis 3. Parks -I 4. Police/Fire/Emergency Services r.xp:r%,'r t :.r : . ' Special Studies • I Traffic Analysis ~ II Air Quality Conformance Analysis III Wetlands Functions and Values Assessment - . rr~t'4^:~•r •~i ~l- . i..- : , . . ~ A ppendix B Additional TransportaU4n information (Baund SeparatelYl ~ ~ ~ ~ , • • f~ . . i . • ~ r ,•}~f ~.~~'Y{ • ,~`..P~~;.i~b:tT~«; : 4 ~ f 1 q ppendix C ~ ~qdditional Public SeWe1 Information ~ ~ , - , c I , ~ ; , , . i~ ~•~~r'MI~ I . ' • 1.,~ ~ ~ . P•~. 1i' t ~ • . I . • ~ - M , 1 ~ f ~ i f I ~ • { •F'~`S c" m~~ i f ;~t ' . 1i • , I•~rf4. ~ AYJ, I ~ 1.E•. I; •'S I ` 0_" •C~~. (.~t .~pdt: ,~~'x41R~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING/ INC • f • ~'si!, ~;r<:: _ • :J~!. , „i,se~j1. March 4, 1996 _d RECEIVED W.O. No. 94221 SPOKANE COUNT1r ' . Spokane County Department of Building and Planning MAR 0 4 1996 1 W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 DIv'sION oF6ultpWaAIY ..BY: ~ PL4NN(NG ~ . , Attn: John Pederson T Re: Comments on the Turtle Creek Draft Environmental Impact Statement . ; . . ~ Dear John: Per a review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, I would like to provide comments to the DEIS and recommend changes to paragraphs on pages 73 and 74 of the Draft EIS, pertaining to sewer issues. ~ i ~ PaLye 73 : 1 st paragraph under Significant Impacts third and fourth sentence should be replaced with the following. ~ At the present time, a majority of the lots within tlie Turtle Creek plat could be served via J . gravity to the sewer lines in 8th Avenue. The remaining lots with sewer hook-ups lower than the gravity lines can facilitate could then either be served via gravity by a future pump station ~ or could have individual onsite low pressure sewage pumps installed in order to use the 8th and ~ Long gravity line. . ! Paee 74: . . . 7~ i 2nd paragraph from the top of the page starting with "Of the approved", and the following ; paragraph should be rep laced with the following. Of the approved plats, approximately one-half of the lots in the Morningside PUD are presently sewered by lines to the west through Ridgemont Estates No. 3, the remaining lots flow through ~the Viewmont phase of this development and will utilize the Long Road sewer. Morningside ~ PUD lots which cannot be sewered via the Viewmont Phase will need to be sewered through.k ; future phases of Ridgemont Estates No. 3 via an easement. -If this-easement cannot be- obtained then the sewer could be rerouted along the northern boundan' of the Morningside Heights Plat ,_.~~y,-• ,R~.~. W.;= to utilize the proposed siphon connecting to the 8-inch sewer line in Long Road. Ridgemont rEstates, Remington Hill, Rockytop Plateau and Steen Addition will be sewered to the west. Of -the total approved plats, approximately 1051ots totalling 28,350 gpd (approximately 701ots from . Morningside and 35 from Mead'ow View Ranch Estates) may need to utilize the 8-inch sewer line in Long Road. Of the submitted plats, approximately one-half of the Morningside Heights ~.PUD could be served by lines to the west through Morningside PUD and Ridgemont Estates if I 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 , Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 + 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 ~ D ~ . ` f~ ' - • ~'~+•{.2~7 g,_,7~~,1 • ~~~~A+E4':l ~•~•.K. . . ' . ~{w~~='~'C~~~7.n •s ~ S . . ; t.i ^}~i'u:- .~.j : c :k ~i'~~~•'~r' J , ~J ~ ~ti1r" ~:~y y 1 Spokane County c 't , t • ~ ' ~::v~i~'-Z' :.•r;~, . i,~~►:Sr ~ ~ d . 'March 4, 1996 Page 2 . an easement is obtained. or all of the lots may need to be directed to the sewer in Long Road. , Of the submitted plats approximately 755 lots totalling 203,850 gpd (335 lots from Morningside , Heights, 101 lots from Turtle Creek and 319 lots from Meadowview Terrace) may need to , ~ utilize the 8-inch sewer line in Long Road. . . , . ; . ~ The 8-inch line as approved will handle 1100 homes based upon the pipe slope and assumed residential household usages as noted. This estimate is based upon the capacity of an 8-inch " PVC sewer line installed with a pipe slope of 0.0075'/ft, flowing at maximum capacity durinQ ~ peaking operation (2.5 peaking factor), assuming 270 gpd/residence. These flow values can be substantiated due to recent studies performed on newly constructed subdivisions with Spokane ► i County where low flow fixtures have been installed. Using these parameters results in a ~ maximum peaking flow of 743,267 gallons per day. The total project flow for the approved and submitted plats that would utilize the 8-inch sewer line in Long Road does not exceed this value. Therefore, in regards to the specific Morningside Heights PUD, Turtle Creek and Meadowview ~ Terrace preliminary plat applications, it can be assumed that sewer capacity is available via the Long Road sewer line. . . ~ PaLye 74 lst paragraph under Mitigating Measures, replace the 2nd sentence with the following: ~`z; A future pump station will be required south of Saltese Creek to pump sewage from the proposed Meadowview Terrace plat to the sewer line in Long Road. In the event that this pump : . : station has been installed and is operational, those lots within Turtle Creek which are not able ~--:•to access the erav. ~ty lines in either 8th Avenue or LonQ Road and have not had individual low 4~•.;~ , ; ; ~ . pressures sewage systems installed could access this future pump station via gravity. ; . Please incorporate these comments into the Final Environmental Impact Statement. -Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to call at 458-6840. Sincerely, " Inlan Pacific gineering Co., Inc. ty,,t~.~. . i'y 'l. 4. ~ • _~_9 ,{.:,j..~el. ~ I Todd R. Whipple, P.E. - ~ I IP~L J! (c,,5. . `~•TRW/tw ; ~ cc: Ramm Associates, Patti Idlof • ~i~~~~:. - Dahm Development, Rich Dahm ~ , . . ;r_ file . . t ' i~ t. ~ - , •'S'•. :::~.i; •y,r?~ t • ' if~"'-~.f.t'~`i'~~l~i . L •i'~~'^.L~ ~'C~ ' :Sj~ _ : 1 yr}' °L a~' G . . .~..~~y✓ ~~lrw a/tl' • ..Y. L:<41;~i~~••t ! ' • f~dt~~'^:J+~K ~ • a • _ . ' •.4 t .1 ~ 'af ^i . S P O K A N E ~ C O U N T Y UTILITIES DIVISION • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT N. 8ruce Rawls, P.E., Utilities Director Decunis M. Scott, P.E., Director • , . ~ May 29, 1996 S . Dahm Development, Inc. 12720 E. Nora Avenue, Suite D ~ Spokane, WA. 99216 Dear Rich: This is to confirm the outcome of our meeting last week concerning the capacity of the ~ proposed sewer in Long Avenue from the South Valley Interceptor to Eighth Avenue. As f currently designed, this sewer would be 8-inch diameter with minimum slope of 0.0075. ~ To resolve our dispute on the capacity of this sewer, Spokane County has agreed to accept the City of Spokane Criteria for flow calculations, as follows: • mannings n= 0.0013 at full depth; variable n with depth of flow . • design flow depth = 0.7 of full depth ~ • flow per single family dwelling = 350 gallons per day . • ; d _ t,~, ! • City of Spokane Peaking factor curve ' • infiltration rate of 200 gallons per inch diameter mile per day . ' - Based on this set of criteria, the 8-inch diameter sewer, as cunently designed would .r ~ handle up to 700 single family residential units. As we discussed, there are currently 143 committed units on this sewer, so the remainder will be available for your use durir_g the ' ' S-year period referenced in the Developer Extension Agreement. As we further discussed, I , ' • h` each time a development is approved for connection to this sewer, the number of . uncommitted units will be reduced accordingly, until all of the capacity is committed. No . , f.'• 51.1:,, , developments will be approved for connection to this sewer if they would exceed the ~ uncommitted capacity. ; If, in the future, additional mutually acceptable measures are taken to equalize peak flows, additional ana1ysis is performed on the routing of peak flows, or other measures are taken ~ to adjust the capacity limitatior}, Spokane County may adjust the limitation on the number :i i of connections into this sewer. Acce tance of the ~p City of Spokane sewer design criteria for the purpose of resolution on . . , this dispute should not be construed to mean that Spokane County will adopt these criteria ~ ; 1026 W. Broadway • Spokane, WA 99260-0180 •(509) 456-3604 FAX: (509) 456-4715 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . {~1.. ~ .~t : t~`'~~ °'y,Y•--•'~' , , City °f ~ curv, use~, by ~uno~y ~ n factot the c4 ~ ed, the peaki g found in any °f a Standard ~,,~e discuss es critena as . de~lgns, d ea~ng factor C{hat ~Se o f ttvs ` . tufe sewet anY star'dar p e coricernea uf flows. lim t for ~ iS 10wer than ~ije ac for peak ho , . S oka~e desigri ma~'Uals. ome cases I,egat. P ~wer self ot accepted s ea Sewers in S either mY i unders~ lease cantact ; : will tesult in . .~onal question ~ y sy p ou have anY adait ~ Sincerely, ~ . ~ B~ce RawlS' p .E N- nbr . . ~ke Yake~ ~EC nd Design . ~ at~ SeweT plan~a 3im Leg ~ ~ . , } ~~jt°,~en ~ . . K~^ +y y R' , . ~ ~ "t.~'~ • . v~ • • . i~ a•' . . ' _ ~t, • v~~• ~ ' S ~ ` . . . . ~ ~~°l~"Q:• . x• ~-~3~,~ _':t-. ~ .~r~~,~.~~`~Y~t ' • ~ ~rY~ ~a,~ • ~v"t~,~r~~~"'YJ 3.~!'`'~ r , 2~a:4•