Loading...
34581 ENGINEERS REVIEW-OTHER DRAINAGE REVIEW FILES > t / ~ E:NGINEEIZ'S REVIEW SHEET ' ~ BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# PF- Related File # ( ) Date to Review 9-22-94 1,irxie . # G Date to AA & DR 7-6-94 T.ime 1:15 Date Received 6-22-94 Project Name 'IURTLE CREEK ADD No. Lots 101 No.Acres 39.1 -Section - Township - Range SITE ADDRESS S 8TH/W BARKEI' PARCEL # 19554•9025 ' Applicant's Name DAI-IM DEV P'C Phone # 535-5777 Address ORANGE FLAG B.LDT STE 215-104 S FREYA ST SPOKANE WA 99202 Work # 534-8086 Date Conditions mailed Contact person Phone # FLOOD ZONE d YES W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING MARYCLIFF HALL 707 W 7TH STE 200 . SPOKANE WA 99204 458-6840 FAX 458-6844 Planning Contact Person STACY BJORDAHL Phoue # 456-2205 Date Submitted Description Initials ~AGREE, MENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLE'IED & COPY TO ACCOUNTTNG FINAI. PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING D ~ NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLE'TED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED J a~-tESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED 7 ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS O~\I-IEARING EXAM ~APPROVED _DENIED- GAPPEALED BBC / PROJECT _APPROVEA _DENIED 0 00 A,c1c,4),A Z,4 ' - 0"44 f-,~ ~ w 440,* ~i r4 "qo 4!w>~* 'P I0~ 3 - ~7 ~ ~ ~ w► + i r"~ ~c 5~~=- ,c~ fl - ~t~ ~y~~C~ u s, -r- ~e~ ~.~-T ~w~cs cs~ ,~~ouuv ~ ~ Gcs e~G e~tf►~ P~ ~ 0 $ ~oT Pi~a,is ll-~l E .u rsc. ~ ~ r 1 - f Q - q 'Z 26 ~:~S ~7LG"cLott ~~w ~~Q 6S `r f. 1- -q`I C&jmwCy1s c,-*%e-r 0Lkr%+10 ~aer__ bt (0(04 q 7 5V6W1m*f (~ae-,Mp Yytv t-mShi cu 4 I - qI tVqc,+fCS (~ec-pte~O ENGINEER'S REVIEW SHEE`T ~ BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FI'LE# ~ ~ Related File # ( ) 'Date to Review Time # Date to AA & DR 7-6-94 Time 1:15 ' • Date Received 6-22-94 Project Name TURTLE CREEK ADD No. Lots 101 No.Acres 39.1 Section - Township - Ikange SITE ADDRESS S 8TH/W BARKER PARCEL # 19554-9025 Applicant's Name DAHM DEV INC Phone # 535-5777 Address ORANGE FLAG BLDT SfiE 215-104 S FREYA ST-SPOKANE WA 99202 Work # 534-8086 Date Conditions mailed Contact person P-AMM ASSOCIATES Phonc # 534-8086 FI.OOD ZONE V YES W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING MARYCLIFF HALL 707 W 7TH STE 200 SPOK;ANE WA 99204 458-6840 FAX 458-6844 4 Planning Contact Person STACY BJORDAHI. Phone # 456-2205 , Date Submitted Description Initials - / / AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS / / BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENxS HEARING EXAM APPROVEn _DENIED-_APPEALED BBC / PROJECT _APPROVED _DEIVIED . . _ . . , . ~ r ~ l . . . .s . ` 4. ' J. • • . r 1 ' ~ S P O K A N E C O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE COUN'IY ENGIlVEER • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~ Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer . Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director , Memorandum DATE: March 4, 1996 TO: John Pederson FROM: Tammie Williams' RE: Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat - DEIS Comments The proposed plat is impacted by a Special Flood Hazard Area as identified by the Flood Insurance Rate Maps. All work must conform to the requirement of the National Flood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spokane County Code. A Floodplaln Development Permit wi11 be required from this office prior to work taking place oa any properry a ponion of . which is in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. General requirements for development in or around this floodplain will include: • No impact to the 100 year base flood elevation due to work in or around the tloodplain. If work is proposed in the floodplain (filling, grading, structures, etc.) a tloodplain analysis and plans must be completed by an engineer licensed in the State ot Washington to show no impact to the floodplain. This analysis and plans must be accepted by this otfice prior to issuance of a Floodplain Development Permit. • No increase in storm runoff may be discharged to the 100 year tloodplain due to ° development of the site. • No lots may be created which are wholly within the identified 100 year floodplain. Each lot must have a suitable site for building outside the floodplain. • All structures must be elevated to have lowest floor including basement floor at least 1 foot above the base flood elevation established on the current Flood Insurance Rate 1'vfaps. • Plans show a crossing structure over the identified floodplain. This structure must be designed to span the 100 year floodplain without impacting the base 100 year flood . elevation. A cietailed rloodplain analysis and plans completed by an engineer licensed in the State of Washington must be prepared to show no impact ro the tloodplain. This analysis and ptans must be accepted by this otfice prior to issuance of a Floodplain Devetopment Permit. ~ ' . , . ~ ' . - ~n. r • ts. W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456-4715 . . ~ - ; - . ~ , . 95 1105 . . NO. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS • OF SPOKANE COUNTY IN THE MATI'ER OF AMENDING THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE FOR SPOK:ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON PERTAINNG ) . TO THE MODIFICATION ) OF PART III, SECTION G OF SAID ) RESOLUTION ORDINANCE TO GRANT PRELIlviTNARY ) PLAT A.PPROVAL FOR FNE (5) YEARS WHLREAS THE EXISTING ORDINANCE ) . . GRANTS PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL ) FOR THREE (3) YEARS ) WI-IEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Section 36.32.120 (6) the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County has the care of county property and the management of county funds and business; and tiVHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 58.17 the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County has adopted a Subdivision Ordinance for the unincorporated , areas of Spokane County and may periodically amend the same; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 36.70, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane Counry hereinafter referred to as the "Board" has created a Plannincr Commission hereinafter referred to as the "Corrunission", and a Division of Buildin~ and Plannin~; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.70, prior to amendinc the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, the Spokane County Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on the proposed amendment after which, by motion encompassing Findino's of Fact, the PlanninQ Com.m.ission shall make a recommendation on the proposed Spokane County Subdivision y Ordinance amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, the Spokane County Division of Building and Plannin~, prepared an Environxnental Checklist pursuant to WAC 197-11 and Spokane Environmental Ordinance, County Code Section 11.10, and on August 30, 1995, a Determination of Nonsignificance was issued; and WHIEREAS, after fifteen (15) days public notice, the Spokane County Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 14, 1995, to consider amending che Subdivision Ordinance for Spokane Counry , as more particularly set forth in Attachment 'A' attached hereto ' and incorporated herein by reference; and tiVHEREAS, the 54th Legislature passed House Bill. 1624 whereby the Legislature amended RCW chapter 58.17, relating to increasing to five (5) years the time after a prelirunary yplat is approved before a final plat must be submitted for approval whereas the previous requirement was for three (3) years; and WHEREAS, the Commission finds that a portion of Part III, Section G of the Spokane Counry Subdivision Ordinance needs to be amended to ensure compliance with recent lecislative bills passed by the state; and ~ BoCC Resolucion/sub.ord. amend/October 3, 1995 PaP 1 of 3 - 9 . 1 i . , - • ' WHEREAS, after considering all testimony given at the public hearing, as well as recognizing complia.nce with SEPA procedures, the Plann.ing Comm.ission determined that the best interest.of the general public, as well as their health, safety, morals and welfare would be met by recommend.ing to the Board of Counry Commissioners of Spokane County the attached amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance for Spokane County; and ; t WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did formally recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that the Subdivision Ord.inance amendment as set forth in the Planning Conunission's Attachment 'A' be adopted; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane'County, after considering the recommendation of the Spokane Counry Planning Commissioa and reviewing the Findings of Fact, deterrnines the best interest of the public will be met by the Board amend.ing the Subdivision Ordinance of Spokane-County as recommended by the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Spokane Counry Pla,nning Commission that they hereby recommend to the Board of Counry Commissioners of Spokane County that the amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance for Spokane Counry as set forth in Attachment 'A' be adopted. - FINDINGS OF FACT I. Pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapters 36.70 and 58.17, the Commission has the legal authoriry to recommend to the Board changes to the Subdivision Ordinance. II. After notice to the public, the Commission held a public hearing'on September 14, 1995, to consider the proposed amendment to the Subdivision Ordinance of Spokane County which is set forth in Attachment 'A', which is attached hereco and incotporated herein by reference, as well as other relevant information and testimony. III. , . After hearin~ all testimony offered, and deliberating on the proposal, the Comrnission adopted the subject recommendation to [he Board by a recorded motion with an affirmative vote of not less that a majority of the total members of the Commission. . IV. The Board acknowledges the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued by the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning on August 30, 1995 with respect to the Subdivision Ordinance amendment. ' V. That the Board concurs with the Findin~s of Fact, Decision and Recommendation of the Commission dated September 14, 1995. VI. The proposed amendment and the Division of Building and Plannincr's file was introduced to the Board at the September 26, 1995 regular public meeting. BoCC Resolutior!/sub.ord. amend/October 3, 1995 Page 2 of 3 . , • ' ' •r NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED, that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane Counry does hereby adopt the reconlmendation of the Spok.ane County Planning ' ~ Coinmission with respect to the Subdivision Ordi.nance of Spokane County, as more particularly ~set forth in Attachment 'A' attached hereto. ~ APPR4VED BY THE BOARD this day of October 1995. , B OA.R.D OF COUNTY C0NIlVIISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNI'Y, WASHINGTON . . ~ _ . / D. ~:[~~ZRIS . l~7`E N HASSON GEORGV- MARLTON " ATT'EST: WILLIAM E. DONAHUE C OF THE B O B Y: ROS v MON'I'AGUE, DEPUTY . f. BoCC ResolutiorJsub.ord. amend/October 3, 1995 Page 3 of 3 ~ 95 1105 - , :<<ATTACHMENT "A" PROPOSED AS+riFNDMENT TO THE ' SPOK:ANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE 0 ~ Added wording is in bold type. Deleted word.ing is in [brackets]. Amend a portion of Part DI, Section G as follows: Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire [three (3)] five (5) years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for. In any case that the subdivider does not apply for a time extension when required under this Ordinance, the preliminary approval expires and the subd.ivision is null and void. . , .i . SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMZTTEE FINDINCS OF FACT, CONCLUSYONS AND ORDER INTRODUCTION This matter has come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on September 22, 1994. The members of the Committee present are: Verona Southern, Chair, Jane Myers and Donald Moore. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Richard Dahm, requests approval of a Preliminary Plat, PE-1753-94, Turtle Creek to divide approximately 39.14 acres into 101 lots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. FXNDZNGS OF FACT AND C4NCLUSIONS 1. The property is generally located at the southwest corner of the Barker RoadiEighth Avenue intersection in the SE 1i4 of Section 19, Township 25 North; Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2. The Committee adopts the Planning Department Report as a part of this record. 3. The exisring land uses in the area include single family dwellings at various densities, vacant undeveloped parcels, and agricultural producrion. 4. The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. . 5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a city-like environment which includes Uarious -land uses. Intensive residential, public faciliries and public service, such as water, sanitary and Storm sewer, police, and fire are, are typical of this category. The residenaal density ranges from 1 unit per acre to 17 units per acre. 6. The existing zoning does implement and conforni to the Comprehensive Plan. . 7. The Arterial Road Plan designates Barker Road as a Principal Arterial, with a ` recommended right of way width of 100 feet. 7n order to implement the Arterial - Road Plan, the County Engineer has requested dedication of a 18 foot wide saip of . property along Barker Road to be set aside as a fLIture acquisition area. 8. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban . Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) previously estabiished as Agricultural zoning in 1957 and redesignated to Urban Residenrial-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 pursuant to : the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal does conform to the requirements of the exisring zone. iY Gr j > ±,np • . , 't'M ,y•~v 9. The provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with and a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued. The Committee, after independent review and in consideration of the appeal of the MDNS, hereby adopts the MDNS as specified. 10. The legal requirements for public noace have been fulfilled. 11. The owners of adjacent lands expressed through petitions, oral tesamony and other dacuments, disapproval of the proposed use. Primary concerns expressed*by the opponents of record include impacts on exisring public services (ie. schools, parks, sewer) wildlife, traffic, possible land use conflicts between urban and suburban lifestyles, and incompatibility of the proposal with the Growth Management Act. 12. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in light of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies. 13. The subdivision proposal is generally consistent with RCW 58.17 and the County subdivision regulations, promoting the public health, safety and general welfare in accordance with standards established by the state and Spokane County. The proposal as conditioned does provide adequate public facilities as cited in RCW 58.17.110 (2). More specifically: a. open spaces b. drainage ways c. public and/or private rights-of-way d. potable water e. sanitary waste disposal f. parks and recreation facilities g. playgrounds h . schools and schoolgrounds . i. sidewalks The above improvements are either existing faciliaes or will be provided by the applicant upon'finalization of this subdivision as conditioned by the Committee and implemented by the variaus County agencies. 14. The Committee additionally findslconcludes: a. The issues identified and concerns expressed by the opponents of record are adequately mirigated by the recommended conditions of approval attached to the preliminary plat. b. The applicant agrees with all conditions of approval. c. The Mica View landowners association submitted an appeal of the Spokane County Planning Departments issuance of Mitigated Deternunation of Nonsignificance (MDNS) and requested that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared. In response to the appeal of the MDNS, the Spokane County Planning Department, pursuant to WAC 197-I1-340 (3)(a), HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Page 2 ITE,~,t ~ PAGE C; • ~,o did not withdraw the MDNS. After reviewing all pertinent informarion and public testimony, the Planning, Department deterniined: 1. There are no idenrified substantial changes to the proposal so that the proposal is likely to have significant adverse impacts. 2. There is no new information indicating or on a proposal's significant adverse environmental impacts. 3. That the MDNS was not procured by misrepresentation or lack of material disclosure. d. The opponents of record requested that Chair, Verona Southern, be dismissed from the Hearing Examiner Committee for this proposal due to a possible conflict of interest and/or appearance of fairness. Chair Southern responded that she would be able to make an impartial decision on the proposal and did not remove herself from the Hearing Examiner Committee. Objections from the opponents to Chair Southerns participation in the decision for this proposal are noted for the record. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL 1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, • heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest. 2. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zones, as amended. The preliminary plat shall be - redesigned to comply with County Roadway Standards. Approval of this redesign shall be administrative. 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in confozmance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition applicarion submittal and approval. 3. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. j 4. A final plat nameinumber shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. 6. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to October 1, 1997. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Page 3 Mcm 4,~ A.^~~ ~ nr ~ lJ _ ~o - - ' ! ' f . . written request approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expirarion date. 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, ,Tract X or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained." NOTE: Building setbacks along Barker Road shalI be 35 feet and are measured from the edge of the Future Acquisition Area. 9. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to filing the final plat. 10. Prior to filing of all or a poraon of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor sha11 submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map scale. 11. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for any lot(s) located on a temporary cul de sac or stub road: "Lot(s) I Block(s) [ I are located on a temporary cul-de-sac. This temporary cul-de-sac may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as deveIopment andlor circulation needs dictate." 12. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which rneet or exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat. 13. A plan for water faciliries adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County • Building & Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with theis respecrive needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor. 14. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The rime schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspecrion by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building pemzits within the final plat. The anangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 15. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contraccual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of f HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Pa~e 4 ITEA,1 PAcE Y o= ~ , - the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities_prior to applicaaon for build.ing permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 16. No building pernut will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been instailed pursuant to the approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system. 17. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from . the appropriate water purveyor and fire protection distnct stating that simple connections to an existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public healch, safety and general welfare. 18. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plac. 19. The dedicatory language of the plat shall contain the following language, "The private roads and common areas cannot be sold or transferred, regardless of any provision in the covenants to the contrary, and shall be considered subservient estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein." 20. A copy of the homeowners/property owners' association articles of incorporation and/or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Department prior to finalizing. 21. Prior to any approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate - with the United States Postal Service to determine type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. 22. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making provisions for public schools prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written description of the subject property to which the agreement applies and also state the dollar amount and any other agreed to mirigating measures. . The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement = to purchase property within said plat pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a futurz agreement between the plattor and school district. Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall confoim to the requirements of the Revised Code of Washington Chapter 82.02. HEC Order for PE-1753-94 "IG Paae 5 ITU,1 Pr1GE .5 - o : . t c~ ' • 23. To satisfy the requirements of RCW 58.17.110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, recrearion and playgrounds, the owner, at his option, shall either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with Spokane County to mitigate the direct impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, open spaces and recreational faciliries within the unincorporated areas of Spokane County. If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recording of the plat and recorded in conjunction therewith. The agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 and substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair Department. Prior to f nalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchaser of property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligation within the voluntary agreement. 24. The final plat(s) shall be addressed in accordance with RCW 58.17.280 and local ordinance. 25. The Spokane County 1'lanning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 18 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utiliries, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required 2 feet of new dedication. b. Future building and other setbacks requiz-ed by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be measLired from the reserved future acquisirion area. c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowzd signs should be located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utiliries. If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocaced at the applicant's expense when roadway iiliprovements are made. d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property a.nd may be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" improvements at the rime Spokane County makes roadway improvements after acquiring said future acquisition area. 26. The owner/applicant shall prepare a"native" landscape plan, for those areas adjacent to Saltese Creek, aild submit the plan to the Department of Ecology (DOE) for review and approval prior to finalization of any phase of the preliminary plat of record. The landscape plan shall include the proposed "fencing" discussed in the memo from DOE dated July 27, 1994. The applicant shall also prepare a"Native HEC Order for PE-1753-94 zO Paje 6 PA ro cl r ~ . . p - L •o • . - Growth Protecaon Easement" for approval by DOE. The easement shall be disclosed on all Phases of the final plat and shall read to the effect: "This subdivision is under the tenns of a Native Growth Protection Easement" for those open space areas adjacent to Saltese Creek. Maintenance and protection of this open space is the responsibility of the Homeowners Association. Encroachment into the Easement by adjacent lots is strictly prohibited." SPOKANE COUNTY nXVIS10N OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Propertv As Prooosed: 1. The condirional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 0-2 Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 3Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the Counry Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 4. The regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program shall be observed. A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of special flood hazard (reference Spokane County Ordinance No. 88-0521). The following statement shall appear within the dedicatory language of the plat: "Development within Chis subdivision shall conform to the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spoka.ne County Code. Purchasers of property in this subdivision are warned of possible flooding or ponding and the potential requu'ement to purchase flood insurance. This warning shall be carried in each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property wirhin this plat in the Area of Special Flood Hazard. " 5. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shail furnish the County Engineer vvith "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. HEC Order for PE-1753-94 ~ O Page 7 !TF!:~ Pr-".` z.: C,, l~ • o - . 0 C • ' 7. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as-built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 8. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following-described property be held in trust until the conrinuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1)-foot - strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the subdivision boundary. (Temporary cul-de-sacs are required when streets terminate at the subdivision boundaries.) 9. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. 10. Dedication of 2 feet of additional right-of-way along Barker Road is required. 11. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Barker Road. • 12. A statement shall be placed in the plat dedicatian providing for future slope easements as required by Spokane County along Barker Road. 13. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. 14. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. 15. Sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Barker Road. 16. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns and successors. 17. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RZD) for said improvements, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to exisring pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This provislon is applicable to Barker Road south of Eighth Avenue. 18. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and parncipating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the requued road improvements. At such time as an RID is created or any Road Impravement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Page 8 !T 4r`:1 PA • o . grantees and assigns. This provision is applicable to Barker Road south of Eighth Avenue. 19. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedicarion: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formadon of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s)' property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, to the formation of an RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s)' property. If an RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (a) that the improvement(s) or constniction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible; (b) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, . exceed the cost and expense of fonnarion of the RDD; and (c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of an . RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW, and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners affirming the final assessment roll. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns without participation by _ Spokane County. The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) yeaxs from the date of execurion below. However, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree that if said RID waiver expires without construction of the required improvements, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree to construct the required improvements at their own expense, pay to Spokane County the then estimated cost of the required improvements to enable the County to complete the same, or furnish a bond or other secure method suitable to the County (which may include the execution of another RID waiver agreement) providing for or securing to the County the actual construction of the improvements. All of the requirements of this agreement shall i-un with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their successor(s) or assign(s)." This provision is applicable to Barker Road south of Eighth Avenue. 20. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of all internal roads, which is to be HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Page 9 1i F1. ; P~;CE / 0 ; . - . " . . ~ ~ • ~l , I constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installation of 36 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing is also required. 21. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Eighth Avenue, which is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 30 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and sidewalk is also required. 22. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, i,ocallaccess standard for the improvement of Lolig Road, which is off-site from this proposal. This will require the addition of 30 feet of asphalt from 8th Avenue north to Fourth Avenue. The construcaon of a hard surface pedestrian walkway on the east side of Long Road shall also be constructed. 23. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Minor Arterial standard for the improvement of Barker Road, which is adjacent to and north of the proposed development. This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of asphalt along the frontage and north to Appleway. ~ . 24 The apPlicant shall pre are and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal Hi hwa De artment of the ro osed state hi hwa -count a c c e p t a l e t o t e t a t e g y p P P g Y Y road intersecaon. Scate Hig hway Dep a rtmen t ap pr ov a l o f t h e p r o p o s e d d e s i g n m u s t be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the state highway are the resPonsibilitY of the sPonsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the K\ amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. This provision applies to the MDNS requirement relating to signalizarion of Barker Road and I-90. 25. The proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving 81ots with ` no extension possible has not been approved by the County Engineer. 26. Private road(s) shall be improved to Spokane County standard for a private road - Urban/Suburban standard serving 81ots, and are subject to approval under Section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. 27. A11 vested owners shall sign and record private road documents as prescribed by the Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane Counry Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenceti in the dedicatory language of the plat. 28. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: . "WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or provide service to the . property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building perniit to be issued ocn property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said pnvate road, and the owners hereby acknowledge that the County has no obligation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey, consri-uct, alter, repair, improve, maintain or provide drainage or snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Page 10 lTEt,I P, C.=~ ~ ~ ~ 0- . o . , . ~ , and shall be binding upon the owner(s), their heirs, successors or assigns, ' including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as ` provided herein." 29. The proposeci subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. 30. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the impact of this proposal upon the existing county road system warxants the detlication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. 31. The following statement sha.ll be placed in the final plat dedication: "The private road as shown hereon is an easement which provides a means of ingress and egress for those lots within the subdivision having frontage thereon." 32. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principal Arterial. The existing right-of-way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required right-of-way dedication, a strip of property 18 feet in width along the Barker Road frontage shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the rime when arterial improvements are made to Barker Road. 33. There may exist utilities, either underground or overhead, affecring the subject pi-operty, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. Spokane County assumes no financial obligarion for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) shoLild check with the applicable utility purveyor and the Spokane County Engineer to determine whether applicant(s) or the utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make ancangements for any necessary work. 34 Based on the traffic analysis provided by the applicant the following conditions of - approval were accepted by the applicant through a Mitigated Determ.ination of Nonsignificance and would be complied with pnor to finalization of the applicable phase: Phase I The applicant shall pave Long Road and build the pedestrian walkway in Phase I of the proposal as delineated in the Preliminary plat of record. Phase TY The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at Barker Road and the Eastbound (south) I-90 ramps. The applicant shall be responsible for design, funding, and construction of the traffic sibnal along with improvements associated with the traffic signal. The traffic signal and improvements shall meet WSDOT standards. HEC Qrder for PE-1753-94 Pa;e 11 P;. '•,G~ /f G; /U . o, ' ' . • '-a . The applicant shall place 10 percent of the cost to upgrade the traffic signal at Barker Road and Appleway in an escrow account managed by Spokane County for future upgrades to the signal at this intersection. Phase III The applicant shall submit plans for review and approval by the County Engineer for the improvement of Barker Road from Eighth Avenue to Appleway to 32 feet. 35. The applicant shall provide grading and erosion control plans prior to finalization of any phase of the proposed development. 36. The private roads as shown on the preliminary plat are not acceptable to the County Eng-ineer. Redesign of a private road would be required prior to approval of any final plat for this proposal. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 2. Sewerage faciliries are not affected by this proposal therefore no recommendation. 3. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94, which perition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)' property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW Chapter 36.94. _ 4. Applicant shall make connection to Public Sewer System. Sewer Connection Permit is required. 5. Plans and specifications for the public facilities connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements apply. 6. Security shall be deposited with the Urilities Department for construction of public facilities connection. SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTI-i DISTRICT 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Pa e 12 ITEA~t ir ~ F,-% CE • ~4 - - . . • ~ 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plac of record for d.istribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each tract of che plat. 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilicies adequate for domestic use, domestic izrigarion use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protecrion district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water - system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harrrriless from claims by any tract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 10. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat/project, and individual service will be provided to each lot/tract prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. _ 11. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the [platlproject], and individual service will be provided to each lot/tract prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized." 12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." HEC Order for PE-17 53-94 Page 13 o~ - - L~ P.'.C: E , 13. The plat dedicaaon shall contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department and water purveyor, shall be installed within this plat, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protecrion to each rract prior to sale of each tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract." SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. 2. Air pollution regulations requiz'e that dust emissions during demolition, consCruction and excavation projects be controlled. This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other consrruction-related activities. 3. SCAPCA strongly recommends that all a-aveled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) be paved and kept clean to minimize dust emissions. 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved - surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. The spraying of roads where tracking occurs, as stated in the checklist, may not be sufficient. Additional measures may be necessary. 5. SCAPCA Regulation I, Aracle VI, and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV, address emission standards. All emission standards must be met. 6. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.). 7. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc.,) must comply with local, state, and federal rules and regulations. HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Page 14 , 1TEM j~ ,Z0 P,'.CE _ J (OFJ8 - _ r~ -r? • . ~ . • ~ 1 ~ ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, APPROVES the application of Richard Dahm for the subdivision of approximately 39.14 acres into 101 lots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as described in the applicaaon PE-1753-94 known as Turtle Creek. Motion by: Jane Myers Seconded by: Donald Moore Vote: ( 3-0 ) UNANIMOUS TO APPROVE TT-E PRELIMINARY PLAT HEARING EXAMINER COMMIITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO 1'HE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE 7 'C~AIR ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director AOHN W. PEDERSON Senior Planner 9/~/v DATE Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, any aggrieved party has the right to appeal this written decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will . be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must submit a written appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$210 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer. If you have any quesrions, please call the Planning Department at (509) 456-2205. HEC Order for PE-1753-94 Page 15 ITEt:4 e),Q ~ n _ . . _ _ . . . . _ ' _ . . . . . . . . • • ~ l - . ~ A ' c ,.i~'' ' • , ~ ~ JUN G 11995 ~ No 9s ossz . . . ~ ~0~~ ~ ~BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER t . : r•_ ~ . OF SPOKANE COUNrrY, WASHINGTON IN THE MAT'rER OF PE -1753 - 94 , ) PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TURTLE ) FINDINGS OF FACT, CREEK; APPLICANT: DAI-M ) CONCLIISIONS AND DECISION ,DEVELOPMENT, INC. ) THIS MATTER, being the consideration by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County ("Board" ) of a request for approval , of a preliminary plat known as Turtle Creek, Spokane County Planning Department File No. PE-1753-94, to divide approximately 39 acres into 101 lots for single family dwellings (hereinafter . referred to as the "proposal"); and the Board having conducted de novo public hearings on the proposal on December 6, 1994 and April 25, 1995, pursuant to the appeal filed by adjacent property owners of the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee's previous approval of such proposal;- and the Board having fully considered the testimony and documents submitted, and the public record files regarding the proposal; and the members of the Board having individually visited or being familiar with the site and vicinity in question; and the Board having rendered an oral decision on May 9, 1995, directing the preparation of an environmental impact statement for the proposal, hereby enters the following Findings of Fact and Decision: F IND INGS . OF FACT AND CONCLUS I ONS 1. The proposal is located at the southwest corner of Barker Road and Eighth Avenue, in the SE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 ivorth, Range 45 E.W.M., Spokane County, washington. 2. The proposal requests approval of a preliminary plat to divide 39.14 acres into 101 lots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-3.5 zone. 3. On June 14, 1994, the applicant, Dahm Development, Inc., submitted an application for the proposal .to the Spokane County Planning Department, which subsequently accepted the application as complete on approximately July 6, 1994. 4. On August 30, 1994, the Planning Department, as lead agency under the County's Local Environmental Ordinance, codified at chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code, issued a Mitigated Determination of Nonsigni.ficance (NIDNS) for the proposal under authority of the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). 5. The Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee held a public hearing on the proposal on September 22, 1994, and approved . FINDINGS OF FACT, • CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION - 1 . e~ , . . the proposal and NIDNS by written f indings and decision adopted on the same date. 6. On September 22, 1994, the Micaview Landowners Association, comprised of landowners in the area, f iled a timely written appeal of the Hearing Examiner Committee's decision regarding the proposal with the Board of County Commis*sioners. 7. On October 26, 1994, the applicant submitted an application to the Planning Department for preliminary approval of a proposed subdivision/planned unit development/rezone named Morningside Heights, Planning Department File No. 1769-94, on a site located in the general area of the Turtle Creek proposal. . 8. The Morningside Heights proposal would divide approximately 147 acres of land into 335 lots for single family residences, and would require a rezone of the respective site from the Suburban Residential-1 and Semi-Rural Residential-5 zones to the Suburban Residential-1 and Suburban Residential-1/2.zones. 9. On December 6, 1994, the Board held a de novo public hearing on the proposal (Turtle Creek), with written comments submitted by December 13, 1994 accepted as part of the record. 10. The primary issues presented at the December 6, 1994 hearing involved land use conflicts between the proposal and surrounding properties, the adequacy of environmental review, and whether the proposal made appropriate provision for roads, schools, parks and other public services. 11. On December 20, 1994, the Board, by written decision, remanded the proposal back to the Planning Department for the submittal of additional information by the applicant on the proposal's adverse environmental impacts, and for reconsideration of the previously issued NIDNS based on such additional information. The Board reques ted addi t ional inf ormat ion and analys is in a number ' of areas, including consideration of the similar impacts f rom the Morningside Heights proposal; schools; parks; traffic arid adjacent agricultural lands. 12. On April 4, 1995; the Planning Department adopted an addendum to the NIDNS prepared' by the applicant, and by written memorandum to the Board indicated that the NIDNS should be retained. 13. On April 25, 1995, the Board conducted another public hearing on the proposal, f.or the purpose of taking public testimony on the' adequacy of the addendum to the NIDNS and regarding the Planning Department's decision to retain the NIDNS as addended. 14. On May 9, 1995, the Board, by written motion, and subj ect to the entry of written decision and findings of fact, overruled the Planning Department and remanded the proposal back to the . FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION - 2 Planning Department for withdrawal of the NIDNS and for preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS). 15. The legal requirements for the public hearings held by the Board have been met. 16. - The Board adopts the public record files of the Planning Department and Board in PE-1753-94, and the testimony presented at both public hearings held by the Board, as part of the record. 17. The oral testimony submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee regarding the proposal was not submitted to or considered by the Board, and does not comprise a part of the record before the Board. The Hearing Examiner Committee' s decision was considered as a recommendation only to the Board regarding approval of the proposal. 18. The Board takes notice of the provisions of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), the Spokane County Zoning Co'de ("Zoning Code"), the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code (adopted by resolution), and the Spokane County Code. 19. The first issue before the Board of County Commissioners is whether or not the facts and information before the Board support the NIDNS as addended. Pursuant to section 11.10.170 (a) (iv) of the County Code, the Board may,. if it believes that the facts and information do. not support the issuance of the NIDNS, direct the responsible official for the Planning Department to alter the threshold decision or provide additional information regarding environmental concerns. 20. The provisions of SEPA should be addressed before the Board renders a decision on whether or not to approve the proposal. If the proposal will have probable, significant adverse impacts on the environment that have not been mitigated, the NIDNS must be withdrawn and a Determination of Significance issued. 21. To approve the proposal, the Board must make written findings that the proposed preliminary plat makes appropriate provision for the public health, safety and general welfare, and for schools, parks and recreation, roads, sidewalks for schoolchildren who only walk to and from school, and other public facilities and relevant factors as described in RCW 58.17.110. The Board must also find that the public use and interest will be served by pl-at approval.' 22. TYie proposal is located in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The purpose of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide for residential development in a "city like" environment, attended by a full range of public services. This includes without limitation adequate schools, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DfiCISION - 3 i , . sanitary waste disposal, parks and recreation facilities, and paved and curbed streets, with 'sidewalks a common amenity. While agricultural activities are expected to be limited in the Urban category, buffering is recommended to mitigate the differences between residential uses and conflicting land uses. 23. The Parks and Recreation Facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan and the Urban category emphasize the need for adequate parks and recreation facilities, in accordance with the County's adopted parks plan. 24. The site and immediately surrounding area were originally zoned Agricultural under the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, which zoning was designated to UR-3.5 zone under the Zoning Code, ef f ective January 1, 1991, pursuant to the Program to Impl ement the Spokane County Zoning Code. 25. The purpose of the UR-3.5 zone is to promote areas of primarily single- famil.y residential use in a urbanized neighborhood setting, having a high level of public services. The UR-3.5 zone establishes a maximum density of three and one half dwelling units per acre. - 26. The area north of the proposal is semi-rural in character, with several acreage lots improved with single family residences and associated large animal-keeping or farming activities, and some small-scale urban type developments. 27. The area south of 8th Avenue is characterized as rural, with large acreages under productive farming. A square mile of land located approximately one-quarter mile south of the site is located in the Semi-Rural Plus category of-the Comprehensive P1an. There are also substantial areas of land located one-quarter mile southeast of the site designated within the Rural category. Both the Rural category and the Semi-Rural Plus category include the goal of preserving productive agricultural lands. 28. The Morningside Heights site is located less than one mile southwest of the proposal. The Planning Department has required preparation of an environmental impact statement in ' conjunction with such proposal, with the scoping process scheduled to be completed in the near future. 29. To serve the proposal with public sewer, the applicant proposes to extend public sewer in Long Road, from the County's sewer interceptor in Appleway Road south to Sth Avenue, and from Long Road east to Barker Road. While the design of such system has been approved by the County, such extension requires negotiation and execution of a sewer Connection agreement with the County. 30. The County Division of Utilities has required the applicant to design the sewer line in Long Road to be 2.4 inches in FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS 11ND DECISTON - 4 diameter, in accordance with the County's Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan. This is a long range planning document that considers the sewer needs of an area if fully developed to urban densities. The record indicates that an 18 inch line might be adequate to serve the sewer basin in the area if fully developed to urban densities under existing zoning. 31. The extension of public sewer in Long Road is needed to serve the Morningside 'Heights proposal, and would greatly facilitate and tend to encourage the development of other properties in the area. Under applicable State Board of Health regulations, development in the area with on-site sewage disposal is currently restricted to one unit per acre. 32. The Morningside Heights proposal calls for extension of a new collector arterial from Chapman Road in the adjacent Morningside PUD to Barker Road, indicating that the Morningside Heights proposal would have similar traff ic impacts to Barker Road between 8th Avenue and Interstate 90 as the current proposal. 33. The applicant has sought sewer and road easements through an SO acre parcel owned by the Ruddell family, located between the Turtle Creek and Morningside Heights proposals and which is being productively farmed. The easements would serve the Morningside Heights proposal as above described. The property is currently zoned Semi-Rural Residential-5. 34. The record suggests that the applicant and Richard Jarvis have been acting in concert in the acquisition and development of land in the Saltese Flats area a-nd surrounding hillsides. This is significant in that Richard Jarvis controls substantial holdings of undeveloped land between the Turtle Creek and Morningside Heights proposal. 35. The record indicates that the cost of the road.and sewer improvements planned by the applicant in conjunction with the proposal would be difficult to pass on without the approval of additional urban development in the Saltese Flats area and surrounding hillsides. 36. The Central Valley School District has indicated that the proposal will adversely impact its ability to provide adequate student housing. The proposal will directly impact Greenacres Elementary, located at 4th and Long. Gxeenacres Elementary is already overcrowded, causing students to be bussed to Sunrise Elementary. 37. Central Valley School District requested that the proposal either be denied or that the applicant enter into a voluntary fee agreement to mitigate the impact of the proposal on the district. While the applicant has indicated its willingness to enter into a voluntary fee agreement, the district has indicated FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION - 5 .y • , that the fees cover only a small portion of the cost of needed school facilities. The record indicates that even with the collection of voluntary impact fees from developments approved in the are, there will not be sufficient funds available to construct the needed facilities. 38.- The Morningside Heights proposal would be' served by Sunrise Elementary if approved. The environmental docurnents fail to disclose what the joint impacts of the Morningside Heights and Turtle Creek proposals on Sunrise Elementary would be. 39. Spokane County does not have sufficient purchased capacity in the regional wastewater treatment plant to serve the area of the proposal, if the County follows its adopted 15 year priority sewering plan. This issue is currently under study by the County but is not discussed in the environmental documents. 40. The proposal will, to a signif icant degree, establish a precedent for future actions with significant environmental impacts,.within the meaning of WAC 19 7-11- 3 3 0 (3) (e)( iv) . Such impacts include probable, significant adverse impacts on (a) schools, (b) prime agricultural lands located between the Turtle, Creek proposal and the Morningside Heights proposal, and (c) sewer capacity, and (d) acreage lots in the area improved with single family residences and having large animal keeping or farming activities, due to land use conflicts. 41. The proposal, even as mitigated, will have probable, significant adverse impacts on schools. , 42. The Morningside Heights and Turtle Creek proposals are "similar actions" within the meaning of WAC 197-11-060 (3)(c), in that they have common aspects that provide a basis for evaluating their environmental consequences together, such as common timing, types of impacts, alternatives, methods of implementation, geography, and a common applicant. 43. The environmental documents fail to consider the indirect impacts on growth in the area resulting from the extension of public sewer to serve the 'Iurtle Creek proposal and Morningside Heights proposal. . 44. The Board takes notice that effective July l, 1994, Spokane County became a county r.equired to plan under the Growth ' Management Act (chapter 36.70A RCW). The'County adopted county- wide planning policies under chapter 36.70A RC'W in December, 1994, and is currently in the process of esta.blishing interim urban growth areas pursuant to chapter 36.70A RCW. The environmental documents do not discuss or analyze the impact of the proposal on the County's requirements to plan under chapter 36.70A RCW. 45. The proposal will negatively impact the Sprague FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION - 6 • i. , - • , Avenue/Appleway Road intersection, which is approaching a failing level of service. While mitigation of such deficiency by tYie applicant may not be warranted to any significant degree, further analysis is needed to determine how such additional impacts could be avoided, including impacts to students crossing the intersection to access Greenacres Junior High School. 46. The NIDNS issued by the Planning Department is not supported by the record and a Determination of Signif icance should be issued. Based on the above findings of fact, the Board enters the following decision: DECISION A. The Board has made no decision regarding approval or disapproval of the proposed preliminary plat. . B. The proposal is remanded back to the responsible official f or the Planning Department f or wi thdrawal of the NIDNS, and, f or preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) by the applicant. . C. Environmental review of the common or cumulative impacts of the Turtle Creek proposal and Morningside Heights proposal, including without limitation consideration of impacts on schools and impacts from the extension of public sewer for such proposals. D. Additional study and information is needed on the following impacts or items, in particular: (1) impacts of the proposal on schools, including impacts to Sunrise Elementary; the feasibility of providing adequate school facilities to serve the proposal through the imposition of voluntary impact f ees on the proposal and other development in the area, along with other financial resources available to the district; and the impacts from bussing on the school district resulting from approval of the proposal; (2) impacts of the proposal on prime agricultural lands loca'ted in the Semi-Rural Plus-or Rural category, particularly in regard to the Ruddell parcel described above; ( 3)'impacts of the proposal on sewer capac ity; (4) avoidance of additional adverse impacts from. the proposal on the intersection of Sprague and Appleway, and on students using such intersection to access Greenacres Junior High; . (5) impacts of the proposal on Spokane County's requirements to plan under chapter 36.70A RCW; and FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION - 7 ; • , . (6) impacts resulting from the likelihood that the proposal and proposed public sewer extension will serve as a precedent for or encourage future land use actions in the area, including any of the above described impacts, and impacts to adjacent land uses. E. The above environmental information/studies shall be completed to the satisfaction of the responsible official within one year, or the application for the proposal will become void. F. Upon completion of the above study in the manner required for an EIS, the proposal shall come back before the Board for further hearing. DATED this 31st day of May, 1995. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPO COUNTY, WASHINGTON . 101 ~ . . ~ . E. Chilbe , Chairman (absent) P 'l1i D. Harris ,y r~+ . ~ , ' - Steven Hasson Commissioners D.E. Chilberg, Steven Hasson and Phillip D. Harris voted unanimously to adopt the oral decision rendered by the Board of County Commissioners on May 9, 1995 . Note: Commissioner Mummey left office on December 31, 1994, and was replaced by Commissioner Harris. Commissioner Harris was absent when the above Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision were executed. . ATTEST: WILLIAM . ONAHUE, ' Cle k f e Board By: , De uty Clerk . FINDINGS OF FACT, ' CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION - 8 ' . ~ , . . e .t. OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR DATE AND PLACE FOR COMI+ENCING AN APPEAL NOTE : Pursuant to WAC 19 7-11- 6 8 0( 5) and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code, notice is hereby given by the Board of County Commissioners in conjunction with the above action taken under SEPA that: (1) The time frame for appealing any SEPA issues with respect to the Determination of Significance ordered by the Board for the above proposal is thirty (30) days af ter the execution of the above Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision, because there is a time frame established by RCW 58.17.180 for appealing the underlying action (not appealable at this time). A notice of intent to raise SEPA issues by judicial appeal is required and must be filed with Wallis D. Hubbard, Director of Planning, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, within thirty (30) calendar days after execution of the above Findings of Fact, Decision and Conditions. (2) The appeal of any SEPA issues must be filed in the Spokane County Superior Court or a court of competent jurisdiction as provided by law. , . FINDINGS OF FACT, • CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION - 9 .1` . . 97 0653 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , IN AND F'OR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE In re- The appeal from a decision of the Hearing Examiner Committee re : - ) NO. PE-1753-94 • ` . PE-1753-99 Turtle Creek ) - ) FINDINGS AND DECISION ' • i, P.ppellant: Micaview Landowners ) , ~4 P_ssociation . . This matter came before the Board of County Commissioners for Spokane County on the sixth day of May, 1997 pursuarit to _proper notice to all persons required by statute and ordinance. The parties were represented by legal counsel and advised the . Board of County Commissioners that they had reached agreement on . z settlement document which would not only resolve tne issue's,, in '~.this manner but also resolve pending litigation. . The commissioners were also advised by staff from the Division of Building and Planning and Engineering that tney hGd been involved in the settlement discussions and that the matters = agreed to by the parties to this disnute were acczptable to both . u J divisions. . The settlement which was reached in this matter was a clear h example of how the public process is designed to work. Both parties worked hard to come up with a plan which was workable for ,S~.. the community involved with this development. The commission, = A being fully advised in this matter, makes the following findings: ~i': .P ~r- sc . oY _ . • Y ' ".yt 1. The zgreement between the parties is acceptable and meets g ~a} the requirements of law in should be accepted. What follows • 9• . • '~f.~~±~ ~ Decision PE-1753-94 Page 1 ~r- ,,.r ~n ~ ~ • ~~°~±:~{!~'~''c . . ~ ! is a statement of the terms of agreement which this board formally adopts as its findings in this case. 2. Lots with f rontage on Eighth Avenue from the western most point through and including parcel 55191.06306 shall have a 5 minimum of 125 feet of street footage. All other lots in the }.J L yt•~• V yL, 1 subdivision shall have a minimum of 80 feet of street f rontage . 3. There will be a maximum of 21 lots in the subdivision with , ' . frontage on Eignth Avenue. 4. All lots with frontage on Eighth Avenue shall have a minimum building set-back of 35 feet measured from the front property line. 5. Road B be will be aligned along the east edge of parcel 55191.0635 as shown on the drawing attached as exhibit "A". Exhibit "A" is identified as the revised preliminary plat of ~record. 6. Road D will be moved east to its new location as shown on • the revised preliminary plat so that it will not line up with Beige Lane. Y~'2Q 7. Long Road from Fourth Avenue to the western edge of the subdivision property will be paved as soon as weather allows during the spring of 1997. A six foot separated hard surrace i' 4 , e.. a asphalt pathway will be provided along the south and west ~ side of this pzving meeting up smoothly with the sidewalk fronting Turtle Creek to provide a safe walk way for children walking to and from Greenacres elementary school. Separation will occur to the extent allowed by right of way Eµ•- Decision PE-1753-94 . ~ • s; ; . P a g e 2 " ' . ; • ~ ~rv, . • , 's`:;i,~;j'~ F i4 restrictions. If easements are required to provide :A• separation, the appellant will seek to secure these frorn x landowners. In no event will condemnation of ro ~ p p,.rty be . . ^ ~z y •;g.?d~ required. If sufficient distance can not be maintained between the walk way and drop off area, a retaining wall, <<; fence or other safety feature will be provided on the soutn a '14L . ti side of the walkway at the corner of 8th and Long to provide . . adequate safety protection to children and others. 8. 8th Avenue from the western edge of the property to Barker Road will be paved to a width of 30ft. within a reasonable time following final plat approval and prior to the issuance of any building permits for lots in the subdivision. Such 30 ~r feet of paving will be placed 18 feet to the south of the road center and 12 feet north of the road center. A two foot ; curb will be required on the south side followed by a five ~oot planting strip and a 5 1/2 foot concrete sidewalk. Such improvements to be constructed at the same time the road is - paved. A plain edge will be provided on the north side of 6s~ a; . the road. Gravel will be placed as necessary on the north side of the road to provide a smooth transition to existing l::t landscaping and natural grass. ~ 9. To control dust resulting from the construction of sewer lines and placement of new gravel on 8th Avenue until such time as 8th Avenue is paved. Dahm Development agrees to have . ~ ' • i.- i.''f 8th P.venue oiled from the end of paving on Long Road to . ~Bzrker Road within two weeks of finalization of this . Decision PE-1753-94 P a g e 3 .d ' • :rY . , 1 ~r4 7 ~ • r• j~' •Y'y,~Y i ~ . . { • • u;~ ~ 3"S F~ 4 1; , i°✓.tt~-.~ agreement by a company which will guarantee their work for the summer . , 10. A separa-Led 8 foot hard surface asphalt walkway (S to seven ;Z^,1~ ~5 , foot separation from existing road) will be constructed . 4~. : , x ~Y~•.'t along Barkzr Road in place of the zdditional road surface -;::~•~~~;r~~ . . • . specified in the Hearing Examiner conditions. This walkway may be constructed at any time but not later than issuance of the fiftieth building permit. This walkway may meander as . necessary to avoid improvements and other obstacles. If a separated walkway is not feasible in light of existing telephone poles, old growth trees, and other disturbznces to existing homeowners, widening Barker Road as specified in the ori-ginal conditions acceptable to the appellant. 'Striping wi-ll be placed to separate the road from the new shoulder if this option is exercised. ~ 11. A separated 8 foot soft surface walkway will be constructed , from 8th Avenue to Saltese Creek within the future right of ~ way acquisition area. This walkway may be constructed at any ~k time but must be finished prior to issuance of building ~t~ ati3 permits for any lot bordering Barker Road. 12. A soft surface walkway for passive recreational use by f~ pedestrian and non-motorized vehicles only will be •;.~,tt constructed along Saltese Creek. Access to the walkway will y be provided at both the Long Road and Barker Road ends of . A • a . the walkway. Such walkway may be constructed at any point in Turtle CreAk build out but :nust be provided prior to . obstruction or removal of the existing farm road that . 'r Decision PE-1753-94 . Page 4 • . `'{T_n'`a_ . y - • tt`?s41~~a*+: .r}•C ••J.'~ t • • ; . _ . ' a': , • . r'. .1.T~ •,r'•F,-j7- I r~ currently provides access to this area. It is recognized by ~iz~ • ~ the parties that construction of this walkway may be subject . Lo the County Critical Areas Ordinance and the Department of Ecology mandated fencing and landscaping plan. A representative of the appellant will be included in . discussions concerning this requiremeZt. 13. All conditions other than those specifica].ly discussed above ; remain as approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee. This • includes road and traffic conditions as well as school mitigation. la. The following architectural standard will be included in the ' covenants: A.- Minimum finished floor area on the main level of a <a~ . ~ a'+~rancher style home will be 1200 square feet. ( note: as Lsed in these covenants finished floor area excludes basernent : whether finished or not, garages, enclosed or open porches, and any other areas not typically considered as finished { t . 1 iving area ) . B. Minimum finished floor area for a tri-level home shall be l`:~ - 1350 square feet on the upper three floors. C. Minimum finished floor area for a two story home shall be . 1350 square feet on the upper two floors. I` D. Minimum finished floor area on the main floor of a split-entry home will be 1000 square feet. R E. No split-entry homes will be placed on lots fronting 8th Avenue unless they have over 1250 finished square feet on -.the main level. In addition, zny tri-level home fronting 8th : . Decision PE-1753-94 Page S c ♦ ,;`a. i. . - ' - ..h,~• , =~:~i {r,: e 'r~ii•' } Avenue will have a minimum of 1450 finished square feet on ~ the upper three levels, and two story homes will have a ~ minimum of 1350 finished square feet with a minimum of 800 finished square feet on the main (ground) floor. , F. All homes fronting 8th Avenue will have basements, double wall construction, lap siding and gridded windows on fror.t ' ..n elevation. ~ G. All homes sha21 have a minimum of a two car attached >.garage. , H. The majority of homes (75o minimum) in the subdivision will have basements, (the lower level of a split-entry and the fourth level of a tri-Level home are to be basements). I. Exterior siding color shall be muted earth tones. Pastel col.ors will be avoided. J. Two story elevations would not be allowed on the flan?cing , street side of corner lots. K. Identical floor plans or elevation would not be allowed on adjacent lots. .~r , L. Double wall construction and lap siding are required on ~ the front elevation of all homes. M. Front elevations shall be that portion of the residence wh?ch is parallel to the front lot line. ~ N. No detached shops or outbuilding larger than a 100 square foot garden type shed will be allowed. . aY 0. No front yard fencing will be allowed. Bac;c yard fencing _ i. -~t may not extend beyond the front of the house. P. The lot ror every home must be landscaped wiLhin 12 . - ~k Decision PE-1753-94 Page 6 i `J ,~a~ ~ •n .1. e ~"'4 l u.;T~'. . f'11, I ` ~••.}yJ~~'N A~j . , .q •^q 7ry months of initiai occupancy. All lots with frontage on 8th. ~ Avenue must have front yard lanciscaped and front yard . y •-r rf sprinkler system installed prior to occupancy unless prohibited by weather. If prohibited by weather, landscaping and sprinklers will be installed as soon as possible. Q. Ali boats, recreational vehicles, trailers, motorcycles„ j; and the like, must be parked in the back yard and screened from view. , R. Two street trees will be planted between the curb and the sidewalk on each lot which fronts 8th Avenue prior to the initial sale of the home. Trees will have'not less than a two inch trunk diameter or be less than eight feet ?n .r- . heignt. No evergreens will be permitted. t~ ,•-•~v; - S. Satellite dishes shall not be allowed except those which are less than 24 inches in diameter and which are attached to the home or are located in the back yard area of alot. 15. In addition to the preceding agreed to language which will become a part of the plat approval, the parties agree to work together to: 4!f~• ~a T F' A. create covenants restricting home business which will o.. r 3~, allow home based business as long as they do not alter the ~ residential Gppearance and use of the neighborhood. Such covenants will prohibit any business signage, any manuzacture or repair of any product that cannot be ~ performed inside the home, any business use that creates . ! : traffic flow or parlcing issues beyond that normally Y1 , associated with residential areas which requires the ~ . T Decision PE-1753-94 Page 7 - 1ii 1 . !'4 .,S.at ° _ + _ . 4 ' I ~titi. • • '~Q. •~i~.• ' ~ c .i ` 'r ~1v = storage of business vehicles other than 1 automobile or ' which alter the appearance of a home away from that normally associated with a residential neighborhood. B. CreatE covenants which restrict prolonged on-street z parking by residents. 16. All conditions which were imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee and which are not in conflict with the above findings are hereby incorporated in this decision. DECISION Based upon the findings set forth above and the agreement between the developer and tne property owners in the vi-cinity, the aDplication for preliminary plat filed herein is approved subject to the above findings and the requirements of the Hea-ring ;.a Examiner Committee which are not in conflict with this decis;on. Dated this ee day of June, 1997. BOAR.D OF COUNTY COMVIISIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY ATTEST: 'ILL ONAHUE 1 ROSKELLY, Chair b Deputy , Ly • . ✓ Y ♦ ~ ~ cpmkts! M. KATE Mc ASLIN Q-O ~E Cp'G . ~y Oe ' 4~ ~ ~~'L • ~N .L. ' h ~ • ~ l ° L P D. HARRIS c t e; . h ' Decision PE-1753-94 Page 8 V ~ y { • • ww+ . JUN-19-1997 14:36 iN,LAND PACIFIC ENG P.02 - No. 97 0429 . . . BEFORE TIM BOARD OF CpLINTy CONfNIISSYONERS OF SPOK;ANE wASHNGroN COUN'I.'Y, IN TBE MATTER CONCERNINCr PRELIlVUNARY } . SUBDIVISIONPE-I753-94 TCJR'ITE CREEK ) WFIH EX STlrIG URBAiv RESIDIINITAI,3.5 ZONING } MOTIOrI APPLICANT: DAHVi DEVELOPIvEENT, IINC. ) The above mattet coming on ogulariy for continued hearing; Ttm ]Frank, AitoraeSr for the Applicant Dahm Development, and Linda Tasca, Cbair afthe Turt1e Creek Commiftee, Ivlicaview Landowners AmoiBtiorl, AppP~ in this matter, did jointly, submit documeats to the Board of County Comrnissioners setting forth an agreeznerrt that had been reached witli regard to this proposal. StsfF advised the Board they had pariicipated in meetings between the parties and advised the Board that the revised conditions set forth in the aareements were approved by the County Staff $nd actually enhanced the original cond.itions of approval_ The Board did, by a roll call vote, unanimousty adopt a morion to approve this PreHminarY Plax with the raevisions agreed to by the parties and itt forth in doalmentation attached hereto. Th.e Board directed Staff to prepare Findings of Fact and Decision, reflecting more specifically this , approval, for execution by the Board at a subsequent regular meeting, at which time the.time frame foF aPPeal will commence. BY ORDER OF TBE BOARI? o~ co BOARD OF COUNTY CONSffSSIONERS . 6 day of May, 1997. „ SPO , V~AS GTOI~I ~ ' ~'~B ~ c .•o~ p .4 A. ~ ATTEST, . , a•~ • JQ o ey, Chair Willi.am E. Donahue S7 • ` 1 ~c!, , • . . Cierk of the ard ~ . I ,f Kd CG3SZti1 ~ by. : Ro ~ e Montague, Deputy D. Harris - 9-7031,67- ~k~x~ApgliGV~d~~t~xlf~~-fite ✓ PE1753MOT.50697 _ ~ . JUN-19-1997 14:37 T~!'_AND PACIFIC ENG P.03 ~ • 9'7 0429 Mr~AVrEW LaNDoWNERS assocIa-rION May 6, 1997 t~~%~? . Board of County Commissionets M~Y - 61997 1 t 16 West Broadway . Spokane, WA 99260 Op~~~RMISSi~~~PCI Dear Commissioners, The NTcaview Lendowners Association, as the appellant to the matter of approvai of preli.m.inary plat PE-1753-94, Turtle Creek, is agreeable to settlement of this matter and approval of the requested sub=division provided the following provisions are made a part of the decision and are required to be included in the restrictive covenants, dedication of plat a.ad arry a.nd all other places as may be required to make these provisions binding on any person or persons involved in the development of this parcel of land and as necessary to ensure that these provisions are ertorceable by individual properiy owners in the area and the Nficaview Landowners Association. The conditions shoutd indicate that should Iitigation be necessary to ensure compiiance with these provisions the prevailing party is entitle to recover associated Iegal fees. Conditions of approval; 1. Lots with frontage on Sth Ave. from the western nzost"point through and inctuding Parcel 55191.0636 shali have a minimum of 125 ft. of street frontage. AlI other lots in . the subdivision shaIl have a minimum of 80 ft, of street frontage. 2. There will be a maximum on 21 lots in the subdivision with frontage on 8th Ave. . 3. A!l lots with frontage on 8th Ave. shall have a rrunimurn building set-back of 35 ft. measured from the front property line. 4. Road B will be aiigned along the east edge of parcel 55191.0635 as shown on the . drawing attached as Exhibit A. 5. Road bwill be moved east from its new location as shown on the attached drawing Exhibit A so that it will not line up with Beige Lane. 6. Long Road from 4th Ave. to the western edge of the subdivision property will be paved as soon as weather allows during the spring of 1997. A 6 foot separated hard surface asphalt pathway will be provided along the south and west side of this paving rneetirg up smoothly with the sidewalk fronting Turtie CFeek to provide a safe walk way for children walking to and from Cneenacres EIemerttary School. Separation will JUN-19-1997 14:37 TtiI_AND PACIFIC ENG P.04 . , , occur to the exte,nt allowed by right of way restrictions. If easernents are required to provide separation the Nficaview Landawners Assoaation wiU seek ta seaue these ' fcom tandownets. In no eveat will coademnation of property be required. If sufficient distance can not be tna,i.atained between the walk way and drop off area a retaining wall, fence, or other sa£ety feature wiU be provided oQ the south side of the wal~way at the corner of 8th & Long to provide adequate safety protection to children and others. 7, ~8th Ave_ from the western edge of the property to Barker wiU be paved to a width of 30 feef withi.a a reasonable time following final plat approvai and prior to the issuance of any building permits for lots in tbe subdivision. Such 30 feet of pavi.ng wiu be placed 18 ft. to the south of road center a.nd 12 ft. to the north of road center. A two foot curb will be required on the south side followed by a S foot planting strip and a 5 I/2 foot concrete sidewall:. Such improvement to be constructed at the same time the road is paved, A plaia edge will be provided on the north side of the road, Gravei witl be placed as necessary on the north side of the road to provide a smooth transition to existing landscaping, natural gtass. . :a 8. To control dust resulting from the construction of sewer lines and placement of new gravel on 8th Ave, until such time as 8th Ave is paved. Dahm Development agrees to have 8th Ave. oiled from the end of paving on Long to Barker wittun 2 weeks of finalization of this agreement by a company which will guarantee thear work for the sumnler. 9. A separated 8 foot hard surface asphalt walkway (5..to-7 foot separation from existing road) wiU be constructed along Barker Road in place of the additional road surface specified in the Hearing E;{aminers Conditions. This walkway may be constructed at any time but not later. than issuance of the SOth building pertYUt. This walkway ma.y meander as necessary to avoid improvements and other obstacles. If a sepal'ated walk- _ : way is not feasible in light of existing telephone poles, otd growth trees, and other disturbances to eaasting homeowners, widening Barker as specified in the original conditions is acceptable to the Niica.view Landowners Association. Striping will be placed to separate the road from the new shoulder if this option is exercised.,- . 10, A separated 8 foot soft surface walkway will be constructed from 8th Ave, to Saltese Creek within the future right of way acquisition area. This walkway may be constructed at any time but must be finished prior to issuance of building permits for any Iot bordering Barker. 11. A soft surface walk-way for passive recreational use by pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles only wi[1 be constructed along Saltcse Creek. Access to the walk-way wi1I be provided at bath the Long and Barker ends of the walk-way. Such waik-way may be constnicted at any point in Turtle Creek build out but must be provided prior to obstruction or removal of the existing farm road that curcently provides access to this JUN-19-1997 14:3E _TJI_AND PACIFIC ENG P.05 N \ t are.a. It is recogrcized by the parties that constcuction of this walkway may be subject . to the County Critical Areas Ordin$ace and the DQE mandated feaci.ag and land=ping p1an. A representative of the Nficaview Landovvners Association wilI be included in discussions concerciing this requirement. ~Z~yAI[ condi4ions other than those specifically discussed above remain as approved by the . Hearing F.xamiaer Conzrruttee. This includes road and traffic conditions as well as -school mitigation. . s-. I`3~9ahm Development will withdraw t6e Strawberry Ridge mobile home park proposal : and place a covenant on this property wtuch wiil run with the land in perpetuity and prevent its development as a mobile or manufactured home park. This subdivision shaf l only be devetoped as single fami]y residences. 14. The following architectural standard will the included in the covenants: a) M'inimum 5.nished floor area on the main level of a rancher style home will be 1200 square feet. (Note: as used irithese covenants finished floor area excludes basement whether finished or not, garages, enclosed or open porches, and any other ar~eas not typica(ly considered as fiNShed Iiving area). b} Mnimum finished floor area fot a tri-level home shall be 1350 square feet on the upper three floors. . c) Ivfinimum finished floor area for a two story home shall be 1350 square feet on the uppertwo floors„ . d) Minimum finished floor area on the rnain floor of a split-entry home will be 1000 square feet. . e} No spIit-entry homes will be piaced on lots frontin$ 8th Ave unless they have over 1250 finished square feet on the ma.in level. In addition any tri-Ievel home fronting Sth Ave. will have a minimum of 1450 finished square feet on the upper three levels, and two story homes will have a minimum of 1350 finished square feet witti a minimurn of 800 finished square feet on the main (ground) floor. fl All homes fronting Sth Ave. will have basements, double wall construction, lap uding and gridded windows on front elevation. g) All homes shall have a minimum of a two car attached garage. h} The majority of homes (75% minimum) in the sub-division will have basements (the lower level of a split-entry and the forth level of a tri-Ievel home are to be basement) JUN-20-1997 09:12 TNI.AND PACIFIC ENG P.01 POSt-it° r8X NOi2 10111 lpages' 4ir- ' . TO ~/`a'~Jll►~ ~ I~ .;..n d5 ► . Co10epL 45pO GD . Co. ,~p=, . LPhone # ~Phone d T.7« /~tr~ c8~ Q~i1 Fax A 32A Fax # t i) F.xterior siding coiot shall be muted earth tones. Pastel coiors would be avoided_ ft" j) Two stary elevarions would not be allowed on the flaztiang street side of corner _ °'lots. k) Identical floor plans or elevation ~vould not be allowed on adjacent lots. ~ ~ 1) - .-Double wall cvnsnuction and Iap siding are required on the frant elevation of all hornesti m) Front elevations shall be that portion of the residence which is parallel to the front !ot tine. n) No detached shops or outbuilding large than a 100 square foot g$rden type shed will be allowed. o} No front yard fencing will be allowed. Back yard fencing may not extend beyond the front of the house. v p) The Iot for every home must be landscaped within 12 months of uutial occupancy. AiI lots with frontage on 8th Ave. must have front yard Iandscaped and front yarii sprinkler systems installed prior to occupancy unless prohibited by weather. If prohibited b.y weather landscaping and sprinkIers will be installed as soon a Possible. q} All boats, recreatioaal vehicles, trailers, motorcycles, ete: must be patked in the back yard and screened from view. r) Two, street trees will be planted betwecn the curb and the sidewalk on each 1ot which fronts 8th Ave. prior to initial saIe of the home. Trees will tzave not Iess than a 2 inch trurtk diameter or. be less than S feet in height. No evergreens. s) Satellite dishes shall not be allowed excapt those wluch are Iess tha.n 24 inches in diameter and which are attached to t.he home or are located in the back yard area of a lot. In addition to the above agreed to language which will become a part of the plat approval, the parties agree a to work together to a) create covena,nts restricting home business which will allow horne base business as long as they do not aiter the residentiai appearance and use of the neighborhood. Such covenants will prohibit any business signage, any rnanufacture or repair of 3ny product that can not be performed inside the home, any business use that creates traffic flow or - parlang issues beyond that normally associated with residential areas, which requires 9 JUN-20-1997 09:12 _TNI_AND PACIFIC ENG P.02 , ~ ` . . ~ the storage of business vehicles other than one automobile or which alter the appearance of a home away from that noImally associated with a residential neighborhood. b} create covenants which restrict prolonged on- street parking by residents. Sincerely, Linda R Tasca, Chairrnan Turtle Creek Com.mittee Micaview I,andowners Association Members of Committee ~ 1 ' ~ • ' I 6-A . ~ ~ ~ REQUE5T FOR DE5IGN DE'VIATION . . $30.00 DATE JULY 15 , 1997 . . . . ROAD NAME 8 TH AVENUE CRP/RID # NAME OF PLAT TURTLE CREEK 1 ST ADDITION Plat # P 1753-94 , ADDRESS OF BLDG ' •NAMiE OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 S 19 T 25 R 45- FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT f# ~ PROJECT LIMITS LONG ROAD (WEST) . BARKER ROAD (EAST) 8TH AVENUE (NORTH) ' EXISTIIVG CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: RpAI) VvqDTH 36' PAVED WITH + 4' ROLLED CURB ROAD SURFACE 2" ACP ON 6" CSR AVG. DAII.Y TRAFFIC 210 Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION TURTLE CREEK IS A 21 LOT SUBDIVISION ON 6.52 ACRES IN THE SPOKANE VALLEY . RETWEEN LONG ROAD AND BARKER ROAD, SOUTH OF 8TH AVENUE. ~_')SED DESIGN DEVIATION MINIMUM ROAD GRADES OF 0.0050 FT/FT, LESS THAN THE SPOKANE COUNTY ~NDARD OF 0.0080 FT/FT UNDER SECTION 3.02 OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS .J AES. N0. 80 - 1592). . ; ~ NSTIFICATION: • 1) DUE TO THE SLOPING-GRADE AT THE SOUTH WEST END OF THE PLAT, AND THE EXISTING FLAT GRADES, ~ . A 0.0050 FT/FT GRAI~E WOULD ALLOW THE LEAST IMPACT TO EXISTING LOTS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH AVENUE, WITH A 2' DITCH APPROVED FOR THE NORTH SIDE PER PHEASANT PARK PLAT, A GREATER CUT OR FILL WOULD MORE SEVERELY IMPACT THE EXISTING LOTS AND DRAINAGE. . 2) THE SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARD, REVISED IN 1995 (RES NO 95-0498) NOW ACCEPTS 0.0050 FT/FT , AS THE MINIMUM ROAD GRADE. . SUBMITTED BY INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COPMANY , DATE JULY 15, 1997 ADDRESS 707 W 7TH, SUITE 200, SPOKANE, WA ZIP CODE 99204 i PHONE!# (509)458-6840 FAX (509) 458-6844 ADMINISTRATIVE VAItIANCE FEE OF S30•00 PAID TO SPOK:ANE COUNTY --1026 W BROADWAY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0170 PHONE ( 09)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 .-•.;'a t~~n -REQUEST WII..L NOT BE WE ~ FUNDS- - ~ CASHICHECK I #~l r RECENED BY DATE d7 L 2 , < - . klplfldaign.dev 8193 ~ ' - o6icn oEuiQnon 31AFF RECOMNlrENDATIONS . ~ ~~c~,n•> >,t.~~D ~-iPPlZ~ v.~'t.- c.~ c-~- ~t-~ ~=o rt O~ -rt dr~ ~,~-r~-L~~ ~}u~ . Approved Approv w/conditions Not Approved ( ) { ( ) - ~ 1; r3~/Q7 Project Manager Date 7~~51971ne'~ . V Approved Approved w/conditions Not Approved Project Management Eng/ineer Date Approved Approved w/conditions Not Approved ~ ~u ~ . . O ations Engineer Date 3POKANE COUNTY ENGINEIIt'S . D ATION: ~pproved w/no conditions Approved as recommended above Not Approved 4Spokane County En eer Date ~ ~s • , ~ ' i , - # . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ w , . • REQUEST FOR DESIGN DEVIATION . $30.40 ' DATE JULY 10 } 1997 ROA.D NAME 8TH AVENUE (SOUTH OF CENTERLINE) CRPlRID # NAME OF PLAT TURTLE CREEK 1 ST ADDITION Plat # PE 1753-94 ADDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG#B9 S19._ T.25_ R45 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT 1# ~ PROJECT LIMITS 8TH AVENUE - LONG ROAD TO BARKER ROAD - EXISTING CONDIT'IONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH ± 12 16' PAVED WIDTH + 2' CURB ROAD SURFACE GR.AVEL 2" ACP ON 6" CSTC AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC 40 210 - Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION TURT_LE CREEK 1ST ADDITION IS A 21-ZOT SUBDIVISION ON 6.52 ACRES IN THE SPOKANE VALLEY BETWEEN LONG ROAD AND BARKER ROAD, SOUTH OF STH AVENUE. , PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION ROLLED CURB PROPOSED IN PLACE OF TYPE B CURB & GUTTER REFERRED TO 1981 SPOKANE COUNTY ROADWAY SECTION N0. I., SAEET S-1 PER FINDINGS OF FACT DATED 9-22-94. JUSTIFICATION: • • 1) ACCESS TO THE LOTS WITHIN THIS PLAT IS PRINCIPALLY ON 8TH AVENUE. ROLLED CURB ALLOWS FOR CONTINUOUS CURBTNG WITHOUT ADVANCE LOCATION OF DRIVEWAY CUTS, WHICH MAY OR MAYNOT SUIT THE, EVENTUAL BUILDER'S/OWNER'S HOUSE PLAN. 2) SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS WERE REVISED IN MAY, 1995. ANY DEVELOPMENT ON NORTH SIDE OF 8TH AVENUE, PLATTED AFTER MAY 1995 WOULD HAVE THE OPTION OF ROLLED CURB FOR A I.OCAL ACCESS , ROAD, MATCHING OUR PROPOSED CURB FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF READY-MADE DRIVEWAY LOCATIONS:-~'~~ , 3) THERE IS NO EXISTING CURB TO MATCH ON NORTH SIDE IN PHEASANT PARK PLAT. , SUBMITTED BY INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. DATE JULY 10, 1997 , ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200, SPOKAXF , WASHINGTON ZIP CODE 99204 PHONE # 15091 458-6840 (509)458-68IL4 (FAX) ' AD TIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.00 PAID TO SFOKANE COUN'I'Y 1026 W BROADWAY, SPOK:ANE WA 99260-0170 PHONE (509 56-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 -REQUEST WILL NOT BE REVIEWED S- - ~ J CASH/CHECK ~ d4 GI~~ RECENED BY DATE ~ L~~ , fc1p1t1design.dev 8J93 ~ naIcn uErInnon ~ 33T FF REC0MNIIIVDATIONS ~ ~ ~~-'.C~~ ►tit N-tE~l~ ~~~f1(J~'~ . Approved Approved w/conditions Not Approved ~ . . Project Manager Date ~G2a~rYlG--yun, ~pQ~p~`~t1 . ~ Appr ~ved Approved w/conditions Not Approved AA'11 ~ , Proje t Management Engineer Date A.pproved Approved w/conditions Not Approved Operations Engineer Date 5POKANE COUNTY ENGINEER'S )ETERMINATION: ipproved w/no conditions Approved as recommended above Not Approved ~ ~ ) ( ) \ ~ ~ Spokane County Engineer Date ~s ' • ~ r ~ ~ . ~ . i ' . S P O K A N E a C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DNLSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTy1ENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director August 6, 1997 Susan Murphy, E.I.T. R.ichard Mason, P.E. : Inland Pacific Engineering . 707 W. 7th Ave, Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 Re: Turtle Creek P 1753 Design deviation # 1 and #2 Susan: The County Engineering Department has completed the review for your design deviations. The Design Deviation for the use of type R curbs on 8`h has been approved. The Design Deviation for the use of grades of 0.5% has been approved with the following conditions: 1. Match the eYisting approved grades for the north side of the street as approved for Pheasant Run, or, 2. Coordinate with Bud Morrison to design and construct the road with one set of grades. 3. Provide a new design for the endre widtli of the road, 4. Provide new dra.inage easements for the ponds on the north side of the street, if needed, 5. Revise and construct new ponds on the north side of the street if the low point changes from its present location. If you hav further questions, please call. - SFo e un Engineering Department G ~ aul L emann, P.E. Plan Review Engineer cc: file 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 . . . ~ . ~ ^INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. July 21, 1997 IPE W . O . #97105 Spokane County Public Works • - Engineering Division 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260-0170 Attn: Paul Lennemann, E.I.T. RE: Turtle Creek (P1753-94) Request for Design Deviation Dear Paul: Enclosed please find the following in regard to a Request for Design Deviation for roadway grades of less than the 1982 Spokane County Road Standards of 0.0080 ft. /ft. . l.) The completed design deviation form. 2.) Plan and profile sheets for 8th Avenue, illustrating where the flatter grades are proposed and how the existing ground profile compares to the proposed grades. 0 a3.) A check in the amount of $30.00 for the review fee. There is an approved plat, Pheasant Park, directly north of the proposed Turtle Creek plat, though its frontage on the north side of 81h Avenue is limited to approximately 650 feet, versus approximately 2000 linear feet on the Turtle Creek plat. Turtle Creek is conditioned to improve both sides of S`'' Avenue, which presents us with two alternatives regarding the north side i.mprovements. The approved Pheasant Park plan is designed with grades less than 0.0080 ft. /ft. , and in some areas, less than 0.0050 ft. /ft. . To match into the east and west and use the approved plan as is, we would need to adopt those same grades on the south side of 81 Avenue. To redesign the Pheasant Park roadway and maintain the low points in the profile and general elevation of the existing drywells on the north side of 8" Avenue, a redesign of 81 _ RF CEIV~ ' " Documentl960871desdcv JU t ,L 2 1,997 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 M. , Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 spOWA ' • • 509-458-6840 9 FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 o' ~ • r . . July 21, 1997 Spokane County Engineers Page 2 Avenue with the proposed grades allows the location of the required ponds to be forced to the desired locations, while impacting the existing lots and driveways the least. The second alternative is our approach. Should you have any questions regarding our request, please give me a call at the office at 458-6840. Thank you. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Company nwicla-L Susan Murphy, E.I. T. sm Enc. cc: file Docu»rrnII9608ndesdev Page 2 of 2 ~ . . ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY RECElV~p 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 ' J U i. 2 1 1997 SPOKANE COUNTY EhdGINEER TO :z5PpY AtJ C- Ldl,t. O`j--- ` DATE: -7 17-~ Iq 1 I.P.E. PROJECT ATTENTION: P/,UL- beO 0 eM A.M k) PROJECT NAME: TU.ULE~ C.keEV, . ^ ! DeSCrlptlOri ~ • Xerox Prints Copy of Letter M ~ r~ Original Drawing M~ Contract' Documents I~ Work Authorization M ~ Report M ~ No. Copies Description ~ - D~ta~o t>ev t A--Wk) + 3000 3 - P LAU- Purpose MI Information M~ Review & Comments MI Per Your Request M~ II Written Approval M~ Signature & Return Remarks ~,4u,L - e0c-~-5eP --4::t-c.AcSE -DeJ t Amo \ ~ JU'LTj r::-7 Vp L1/r•~ . C/ ' ~-4..t 14`f 1 V v' u ~ . , , Signed: cc: . ~ D:\TRNSMT.PMS . . ~ . . . . . , INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. Spokane, WA 99204 g E R 12797 O Num Invoice Inv Date Inv Amt, Net Amt 97105 07/10/97 ~ 30.00 1P E C E . /A1 / /I 1 ~ " " . _ • ' ~ j s~~ n ~ z RECEIVED FROM • ~ , ~•L, ! _ - pp .!/U R O ~ Address ~~.5 a • N FoR fLtfvttl ; HO~v ip ~ . n pA / ~ r ACCOVNT ~ ~ _ ~ • I z ~ CAsN , y BALANCE G ~ CHECK ~ ~ ou~ 1 loo l ,r BY ~ NET CHECK d AM pnONE _ Y e ndo z o BAIO.ANCE ORDER a L E 07/1.0/9 7 3 0. 0 0 i OUE 1 = i 3 p Nrdaonk^os. 1a89 . I- Y~' • INI w-.01mp7C - ~ ~ WASHINGTON TRUST BANK 12797 'ENGINEERING CO., INC. Spokane, Washington 99210-2127 707 W. 7th AVE., SUITE 200 28_S/1251 ~ i SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 ~ (509) 458-6840 • Check: 12797 E i, ; DATE AMOUNT ~ 07/10/97 30.00 PAY ***THIRTY AND N01100 DOLLARS*** ' "OTHE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS )RDER )F • ~ AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE ~?~rS'~3£'•rS."aY:~"'.e~>''4'"x~SY~~I'la~l~l~'-'~-~~'*1,I7 ,MjT~~~1M a 0 L 2 7 9 7 u' 1: 12 5 10008 91: 100 97 6 4 14 3111 y . ~ RECEIv INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. ED JUl 141997 _ SPpIGq1VE COUN~ ENG June 10, 1997 lNEER ' 1"PE W.O. #97105 Spokane County Public Works Engineering Division 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260-0170 Attn: Paul Lerulemann, E.I.T. RE: Turtle Creek (PE 1753-94) Request for Design Deviation;Type "R" curb Dear Paul: Enclosed please find two (2) requests for Design Deviations for design of Type "R" curb for the above referenced plat. We are providing for ~our consideration and evaluation: 1.) Two completed Design Deviation request forms. . 2.) Two typical cross sections of 81 Avenue, one for the proposed 12' width, and one for a 15' width approved for a section of 81 Avenue for the Pheasant Park plat. A separate Design Deviation for 8" Avenue is being submitted. 3.) A typical cross section of interior streets, for which the second Design Deviation is being submitted. 4.) An overall plan of the plat, with the affected roads highlighted for each request. 5.) Two checks in the amount of $30.00 each for the review fees. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 458-6840. A prompt response to our requests for Design Deviations would, as always, be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Company S 4 an A~uA5y, Enc. cc: file 707 West 7ih • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 . Documtnt1971051ddev 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 208-765-7784 • FAX: 208-769-7277 I EXISTING 50' RIGHT OF WAY 13.50' UTILITY , & SIDEWALK EASEMENT 12' 1 18' - 2' GRAVEL (NORTH) (SOUm) 2' 5' 1 5.50' SHOULDER PLANIING SIDEWALK ~ g' i ~ SPO.E QR~ CURB STRIP P~ .0200 .02o ?'1,~ ~F,.,.W n~:-.~,• ..~,,.,w ,,,,w.u ~ ^ 1 q~ ~.N ~ , _ 4,,;• I~ ~ ~ ,i ?~~9 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. was~yr , 4" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT ~~w • ~G CONCRETE SIDEWALK ~ Ci , . • ~ 1303 0 ~FGI • ~ ~ . J . . . SIONAI.~G 8th AVE. STA. 10+00 TO 23+99,77 & STA. 30+56 TO BARKER RD. EXPIRES 06/11/ NOT TO SCALE ' INLAND PACIFIC TURTLE CREEK PHASE 1 , . ENGINEERING 8th AVE. CROSS SECTION 707 west 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 7/7/97 \ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX; (509) 456-68441 \ / t r . \ . ` EXISTING 50' RIGHT OF WAY ~ 13.50' UTILITY & SIDEWALK EASEMENT 15'* ~ 18' _ (NORTH) (SOUTH) , ' 2' S' 1 5.50' PLANTING SIDEWALK • SPO. C0. STD. STRIP 6' ~ TYPE "R" CURB ' 7 . ~1 7i~ .0200 .0200 ~ ~ Mq~, , . , , . ~ M 2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. 4" THICK PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK *NOTE: . ~Po wAS 15' OF ASPHALT ON NORTH SIDE OF 8th AVE, APPROVED AS A PART _ OF "PHEASANT PARK" ON 10/24/94 , 1303 8th AVE. STA, 23+99.77 TO 30+56 0~'~cr~. NOT TO SCALE ~ EXPIRES 0&111 ~ ~ J INLAND PACIFIC TURTLE CREEK PHASE 1 ENGINEERING 8th AVE. CROSS SECTION 707 West 7th • Sulte 200 (509) 458-6840 ~ Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ \ ~ATE: ~~~~97 ~ ~ i Q i . ~ ~ ~ I . ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ I ~ ` I ~ I II i I I O I I - ^ - - - - - - ~"'I Q I I I I I 0 ~ ~ I I ~ Z I I . I O I I I I I ~ J 4 ~ I I I _ _ ~ ~ - - I ~ ' I I I - _ _ _ ~ I - I _ ~ - I I ` I I • ' I _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ I' - - - ~ ~ ~ i _ \ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I w ~ I I Y I I I \ ~ I I ~ I I ~ I I I I I ~ \ I { I I I I I \ I . ~ ~ ~ . \ _ ~ _ ~ ~ - - ,I I _ - - J... , - ~ ~ . I ---=.1.- . , ~ , L. _ _ . _ . . ~ . :r. ~ r ~ .~~,1+~.~.`• .:.s,. - ,i, r ,y., . „si EIGHTH ~ EIGHTH AVENUE 8~~ A~ ~ . . ~Ih x= - - i•i4 ~:i.Y ;4 - - ~ ~ . -Y~ ,F~~'.+ . F<. . _ - - - - - ' - _ _ _ - _ _ \ ~ ~ I ' ' _ ' _ ' ~ • ~ , ~ • ~ Q . W ~ , ~ ' U w : \ Z ~ W W W m , ~ ~ . C9 • • ~ \ / ~ • ~ W. COURT '~liu v n n u . ROAD C E. CT. C , ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ : ~ i ~ ~ ~ . \ ` ~ \ \ . ~ V ' . ~ ~ . " " COURT "A" ~ ROAD A , ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o . ~ . . ~0 • , /~p ; LANE °X" (PR VA~E : ~ ~I ~ . ~ 1 ~ . 1 . 1~ - ~ \ :W . , : ~ : ~ , . , ` ~ U M B E R N ~ RECEIPT q q.5~~7 INLAND PACIFIC EN( n DATF - ~ _ o RECEIVED FROM ~ PO Num Invo ~ ~ ~9 1 Q ! ~ Address z ~~~1•'~t,, ~/v~~` , DOLLARS ~ FOR 8 Z m ~ OUNT HOW PAID N ACC BEGINNING I I ICAgH I ~ ~ BAIANCE 2 AMOUNT I ~/yJ I CHECK ~ PAID f^• A BALANCE MONEY I o A O 3 O YV91sonJOnos. 1989 DUE I I ORDER BY - , v Check 12793 NET CHECK Vendor SP0008 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Date 07/08/97 30.00 a INLAND PACIF'IC ENGINEERING CO., INC. ~ Spokane, WaO h ng on 992N0-2127 12793 111/ 707 W. 7th AVE., SUITE 200 28_g/1251 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 (509) 458-6840 Check: 12793 DATE AMOUNT 07/08/97 30.00 PAY ***THIRTY AND N01100 DOLLARS*** TOTHE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS ~ ORDER OF AUTHORIZED SIGNATUR ,,.a~►3~4.1I2C~6'~~_i.;-..,v'~$75r::."~~,du.•~='I. - a • --tf: m, &l -s1a. f ~ _ _ ;Iil :lw/. 7- - o 1'~•ti,ti_,e.:.: ~I~,A_7i.,.r.nazr~ti.., ~ 11•p 12 79 3ii' 1: 12 5 L000891: 1009 764 14 311' . 3' • ► '.:ti • 'V. r . . ~ M -WMORATDL;TM . .,.r July zs, 1997 . To: Dean Franz From: Paul Lennemann Re: Turtle Creek P 1753 Design Deviation #1 On behalf of the Sponsor, Inland Pacific Engineering is requesting a design deviation to allow a minimum longitudinal grade of 0.5% on 8`h Ave. Turtle Creek is located south west of 8`h and Barker. It is govemed by the 1981 Road Standards which has a minimum grade of 0.8%. 8'' Ave. is classified as a Local Access Road. It has approximately 30' of gravel surfacing. 8d' Ave. is required to have half street improvcments Nvith this plat: Road plans from a different development have been approved for the other side of the street but have not been constructed. I have spoken iNrith the developer, Rich Dalun, and the developer responsiblo for the improvements on the north side of the street, Bud Morrison. They are willing to abandon the previous plans and work together to provide a symmetric section. I recomrnend approval for this deviation with the following conditions: 1. Match the existing approved grades for the norttl side of the street as approved for Pheasant Run, or, 2. Coordinate -vvith Bud Momson to design and construct the road ivith one set of grades. 3. Provide a new design for the entire width of the road, 4. Provide new drainage easements for the ponds,on the north side of the street, if needed, 5. Revise and construct new ponds on the north side of the street if the low point changes from its present location. . . . JUL-2I-1997 16:06 "?_AND PACIFIC ENG . , P. 01 ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. , EC E! V/ED Post-ir Fax Nate 7671 0~~ ~t2kLVjpage$► 2., To Frorn ~ ' r ~p ~ 1997 Co~. . tuA ' SPpkANE e pU'~1TY - Phone # ~ ~ ~ ~Phone . trJGiNFER dqp-W" 1 L 5~- ~o July 21, 1997 Fax p 324 _ a~-1 b ~ Fax p & IPE W.O. #97105 . 1 Spokane County Public Works tRet'" LdJ a5 Engineering Division ~ 1026 W. Broadway Avenue. ,S,p J ~ s~- Spokane, Washington 99260-0170 . wk ~ Wn.9Attn: Paul Lennemann. E.I.T. ~ J~ - . . ~Ck~ vw v L~C ~ RE: Turtle Creek- (P1753-94) kQ6AW,~ An Request for Design Deviation .TLLLO -7hz` 1~ Dear Paul: 5K~-, Enctosed please find the following in regard to a Request for Design Deviation for roadway grades of iess than the 1982 Spokane County Road Standards of 0.0080 ft.lft.. 1.) The completed design deviation form, 2.) Plan and profile sheets for 8th Avenue, illustrating where the flatter grades are proposed and how the existing ground profile compares to the proposed grades. 3.) A check in the amount of $30.00 for the review fee. There is an approved plat, Pheasant Park, directly north of the proposed Turtie Creek plat, " though its frontage on the north side of 81 Avenue is limitec to approximately 650 feet, versus - approximately 20001inear feet on the 111rt1e Creek plat. 'Ilutle Creek is conditioned to improve both sides of 8`" Avenue, which presents us with two alternatives regarding the north side improvements. The approved Pheasanf Park glan is designed with grades less than 0.0080 ft./ft., snd in some areas, less than 0.0050 ft./ft., To niatch into the east and west and use the approved plan as is, we would need to adopt those same grades on the south side of 81 Avernie. To redesign the Pheasant Park roadway and maintain th.e Iow points in the profile and general eievativn of the existing drywells on the north side of 8`h Avenue, a redesign of g`n . , -f j Docwmeat1966871detdev • . • 707 West 7th •$uite 200 . 2020 takewpod Drive • Suf(e 205 Spokane, WA 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 509•458-6840 • FA;C; 509-45a-6844 208-765-7784 • FnX: 208-769•7277 JUL-21-1997 16:07 T"1~_AND PACIFIC ENG P.02 July 21, 1997 Spokane County Engineers Page 2 Avenue with the proposed grades allows the location of che required ponds to be forced to the : desired locations, while impacting the existing lots and driveways the least. The second alternative is our approach. Shoujd you have any questions regarding our request, piease give me a call at the office at 458-6840. Thank you. u Sincerely, Iniand Pacific Engineering Company ~AgAP40 Susan Murphy, E.I.T. sm Enc. cc: file Page 2 of 2 . J _ ~ , _ - . , - S09/918-5777 DAHM DEV,8L01pME1VT, INL'. Fax 5491926-4690 12720 E. Noru Avtttue, Suilt D Spokane, WA 99216 ~ ' of ,tOB$ PM VIA FAX/MAIL 509l324-3478 ~ CC; L~R Ina Auqust 21, 1997 ~ Spokane County Division of Engineezing and Roads ' 1026 W. Broadway Avenue ~ Spokane, WA 99260--0170 Attention: Paul Lennemann, P.E. Re: Turtle Creek P1753 Design deviation 01 and #2 Dear Paul: Hud Morrison and I have met and have come to an agreement that the design for Turtle Creek is acceptable toBud and myself. We are anxious to start the curb and paving as soon as possible and would appreciate your expediting approval of the construction plans so we can begin. If you have any questions please call. truly yours, 4e uly yours, . a ichara T. Dahm son 12720 E. Nora, suite D 22305 E. Euclid . Spokane, wA 99216 otis Orchard, WA 99027 RTb:sjb/PREPL cc: Susan Murphy - Inland Pacific Erigineering, Inc. Dick Mason - InZand Pacific Engineering, Tnc. • . E it111 n~afi_a?~_Gnc_r •~r~r ~~[I fA('](dJf1'1QA'711 rtiuHn n(%•rn fivJl ia 77_ I)nK t • c al' , ( •1 ~ ~ G . ~ . D REQUEST F4R DESIGN DEVIATI4N . . - ~ $30.00 DATE JULX 10, 1997 ROAD NAME GREENACRES & BEIGE ROADS CR.P/RID # NAME OF PLAT TURTLE CREF~ ~ Plat # PE 1753-94 - A.DDRESS OF BLDG NAME OF BLDG PROJECT BLDG# B9 Si9 T? 5 R45 FEDERAL/STATE PROJECT # ~ PROJECT LIMITS LONG ROAD (WEST) BARKER ROAD (EAST) 8TH AVENUE (NORTH) EXISTING CONDITIONS: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: ROAD WIDTH 36' PAVED WITH + 4' ROLLED CURB ROAD SURFACE • 2" ACP ON 6" CSTC AVG. DAII.Y TRAFFIC Current Traffic Count Design Year Traffic Count PROJECT DESCRIPTION TURTLE CREEK IS A 101 LOT SUBDIVISION ON 39 ACRES IN THE SPOKANE VALLEY, , BETWEEN LONG ROAD AND BARKER ROAD, SOUTH OF 8TH AVENUE.. , PROPOSED DESIGN DEVIATION ROLLED CURB PROPOSED IN PLACE OF TYPE B CURB & GUTTER REFERRED TO IN 1981 SPOKANE COUNTY ROADWAY SECTION N0. 1, SHEET S-1 PER FINDZNG OF*FACT DATED 9-22-94. THIS REQUEST IS FOR ALL TNTERIOR STREETS. 8TH AVENUE REQUEST FOR ROLLED CURB IS A SEPAR.ATE RE.QUESTS, (DATED & SUBMITTED 7-10-97, AFFECTING 80 LOTS). . JUSTIFICATION: - 1) ROLLED CURB ALLOWS FOR CONTINUOUS CURBING WITHOUT ADVANCE LQCATION OF DRIVEWAY CUTSr 'WHICH HAVE, IN THE PAST, BEEN CUT OUT AND REPLACED WHEN A BUILDER,/OWNER CHOOSES A HOUSE PLAN WITH A DIFFERENT DRIVEWAY LOCATION THAN WHAT IS ALREADY POURED. , 2) SPOKANE COUNTY STANDARDS G1ERE REVISED IN MAY,,. 1995. ANY DEVELOPMENT PLATTED AFTER MAY , 1995 HAS AN OPTION TO CHOOSE THE MORE VERSATILE ROLLED CURB FOR LOCAL ACCESS ROADS. 3) THERE IS NO EXISTTNG CURB TO MATCH,,, PROVIDING A UNIFORM LOOK TO THE ENTIRE PLAT USING , ROLLED CURB, AS IN THE CASE OF OTHER NEW DEVELOPMENTS WI'iH•INTERIOR LOCAL ACCESS STREETS. SUBMITTED BY INLAvD PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. DATE JULY 10. 1997 ADDRESS 707 WEST 7TH AVENUE, SUITE 200. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON ZIP CODE 99204 PHONE # f5091 458-6840 (509)458-6844 (FAX) ADNIINISTRATIVE VARIANCE FEE OF $30.40 PAID TO SPOKANE COUNTY `1026 W BRO AY, SPOKANE WA 99260-0170 PHONE (509)456-3600 FAX (509)324-3478 L!.U -REQUEST WII.L NOT BE ~ OUT FUNDS- ~ CASH/CHECK # qRECEIVED BY . . , ~ rx" Z/0 DATE J-- i - ~L- i {rlnlfldenivn Arv 8l93 •ti 7 Y.- oQicn nEvianon ; S"I'AF'F E,FC OMMIENDATIONS , - Appraved Approved w/conditions Not Approved . Project Manager Date ~ Approved Approved wlconditions Not Apgroved • Project Management Engineer . Date .pproved Approved w/conditions Not Approved ) ~ ) ~ ) • r. . Operarions Engineer Date ; ~ ~ ?o~ courrrY EvGnvUR's . ETERMINATION: - - ~ . . rproved wlno conditions Approved as recommended above Not Approved ) ~ ) ~ ) , v,- . Spokane County Engineer Date . - RE ,C~ ! vEINLAND-PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. D JUL 10 1997 SPpKANE COUN~, ENG1 , June 10, 1997 NEEA IPE W . O . #97105 Spokane County Public Works . Engineering Division 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260-0170 Attn: Paul Lennemann, E.I.T. RE: Turtle Creek (PE 1753-94) Request for Design Deviation;Type "R" curb Dear Paul: Enclosed please find two (2) requests for Design Deviations for design of Type "R" curb for the above referenced plat. We are providing for your consideration and evaluation: 1.) Two completed Design Deviation request forms. 2.) Two typical cross sections of 8' Avenue, one for the proposed 12' width, and one for a 15' width approved for a section of 8' Avenue for the Pheasant Park plat. A separate Design Deviation for 8`h Avenue is being submitted. 3.) A typical cross section of interior streets, for which the second Design Deviation is being submitted. 4.) An overall plan of the plat, with the affected roads highlighted for each request. 5.) Two checks in the amount of $30.00 each for the review fees. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 458-6840. A prompt response to our requests for Design Deviations would, as always, be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Company , S an urp y, E. . Enc. " cc: file Y 707 West 7th • Suite 200 2020 Lakewood Drive • Suite 205 . Spokane, Ma 99204 Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 Documtrtt1971051ddtv 509-458-6840 • F,a\: .509-458-6844 208-765-7784 - FAX: 208-769-7277 ` ' '19~ • ' • " . •p . . • • 4 ' ' .2',•. `Sif_I ' .C~{,~:. /100 •'14 ' • t. , 1 k' PROPOSED . 50' RIGHT OF WAY • , 18' 18' 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 7' 20 , 2'. 7' 10' UTIUTY EASEMENT SPO. ~06 STD. ~ SPO. QOp STD. TYPE R CURB TYPE R CURB f 2% .0200 .0200 t 2% ...,y,..~. , r.. . . \-2" CLASS "B" ASPHALT CONCRETE CONTAINING 5 3/4% TO 6 1/4% ASPHALT ON 6" CRUSHED ROCK TOP COURSE IN ACCORDANCE WITH WSDOT SPECIFICATIONS. was y , Z ~ . q 13037 ( 4'tClSTvx~ ~ f~NAL ~yG EXPIRES 06/11/4y6 ~ ` NOT TO SCALE J ~ \ ~ INLAND ~ TURTLE CREEK ~ ' PACIFIC I N TE R I 0 R ENGINEERING LOCAL ACCESS STREETS ' 707 West 7th Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 7/9/97 Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844/ ` ~ _ , , • l . ~t. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INC. Spokane, WA 99204 N U M B E. R qQ~Oa :t PO Nu ~ m Inv _ RECEIPT DES y DATF l ~ • • . _ ~ L 4 f o RECEIVED FROM ~ D n . Adcfress ~ ~ ~ OD DOLLARS r` ~ ~ FOR m ~ ~ ~ . , u 7 O Z ,t!~% ~ ACCOUNT I HOW PAID . y 1 I 1 i . BEGINNING ~ I CASH ~ BALANCE + 1 o AMOUNT I~!' I CHECK ' PAID ~ ~ c • o I MONEY ~ ~ gAWNCE . 3 o vtiveon.~oroe~. DUE ORDER , BY Check 12794 NET CHECK Vendor SP0008 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS Date 07/08/97 30.00 . INLAND PACIFiC ENGINEERING M. INC. pokane, WaO h ng on 992,"0 2127 12794 Ilir 707 W. 7th AVE., SUITE 200 28_8/1251 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 (509) 458-6840 ' Check: 12794 ' ; DATE AMOUNT 07/08/97 30.00 PAY ***THIRTY AND N01100 DOLLARS*** . TOTHE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS . ORDER OF ~ ~ • , AUTH IZEO sY ~'ra - o -si • .,y • ~ , ~ ~ 0 L 2791: 12 5 L000894 1009 764 14 3 . ~ . r. _ . , ct• ,.qu. ~ ' .a ~ ~ ' ~ LONG ROAD ~ ~ / / / / / ~ I / r__________ , ~ . , ~ ~ ~ a r_________ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ D 1 ~ ; ~ ~---L---- ~ - ~ ~ . ,f~ ~ GR~EE~NA R ' . , . / + . ~ .~4~ n , . ~ S~ " yy~ ' ` ,_i.__-_~- ~ Q ~ , ,n ~ l~ ' . ~L ` . •J~ , Y . r ~ T . ~ : o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' # ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I -~'~-L_ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ I I ~ I I ~ - , ` - ~ I ~z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ ~ ~ X ~ I I I ~ ~ r. ~ ~ o r___I___l._ D ~ I _I , 1 ~ % ~ ~ i i / Ly / ~ ~ ~ L _ BARKER ~ ROAD D04 BARKER ROAD- • ~ I ~ ~ ~ T ~ ~ I I I~ I I r I ~ ~ m ~ I , ~ ~ ~ = I _ I ~ I ?  L- m ~ ; - r ~ , ' _ t ~ , ~t. NO. 97-0148A . BEF~RE T~ BOARD OF COUNTY CONIlvIISSIONERS OF SPOK:ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ - x~~ ~ . ~ ]N T'~E MATTER CONCERNII~tG PRELIMINARY ~ ) : ~ SUBDIVISION PE-1753-94 TURTLE CREEK ~ ) NOTICE OF ; . s ; ~ ' . , WTTH EXISTING URBAN RESIDFI`1"TIAL,-3.5 ZONING ) PUBLIC HEARII~TG . APPLICANT: DAI IlVI DEVELOPN~NT, INC. ) ~ o ~ . . :~r;a,~, . . . , . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County (Board) , that the applicant in the above matter, has completed an Envi.ronmental Impact Sta.tement addressing ' . n- the environmental impacts of the above proposal as directed by the Board. The proposal corisists of : the subdivision of approximately 39 acres into 101 lots, for single family dwellings and those uses pernutted in the existing UR-3.5 zone, on property generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Barker Road and 8`~ Avenue. NOTICE IS FURTHER GTVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane ~ounty, Washington, will conduct a denovo public hearing . T[JESDAY, MARCH 25, 1997, AT 5:00 P.M. . ~ ~ (or as soon as possible thereafter) ~ ~ COM1VfISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM SPOK:.ANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUII.,DING 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOK:ANE, WA 99260 . to consider this proposal along with any environmental impacts. Any person may appear at sa.id hearing and present testimony verbally or in writing regarding such matters. The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessary. Further ~ information can be obtained on the proposal and any environmental impacts by contacting John Pederson, Spokane County Building and Planning Department, at (509) 456-3675. The Board's r•.~t;ngs and hearings are conducted in ia.cilities which are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particutar information with respect to the accessibility of the Publ.ic Works Building, Commassioners' Assembly Room, please contact Rosanne Montague, Clerk of the Board, at (509) 45,6-2265. ~ . BY ORDER OF THE BO of February, 1997. O IS~•, E~°G r° WYL,LZAM E. DONAHUE ~•o r~ f o:` ~ ~ CLERK OF T~-~ BOA.RD ~ p ; y ~,~1,~ ~ - ~ o ' -r; • . . . ~ r(1 ~ ~ p?:~ o ~ ~0~~ $ ~ r~.~ : l~ '`l~COUy~ ' ~ B . . ~ ROS MONTAGUE, DE~'UTY . S PE1753 OT. 18 DISTRIBUTION: PLANNING LINDA PUBLISH: Valley News Herald ~ ~ • ~ l~ ~ ~ .t•tl~s ? „ ' ~ . . . ~ •1 ".I• ~ ZI.• • o - . • - , A"~.. 97 Q, LJ 6 • ` 'E f NO. , ,<<_.•~ . BEFORE TBE BOARD OF COUNTY COMNffSSIONERS OF SPOK:ANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON „ . .;:i.. ~ - IN T'HE MATTER CONCERNIING PRELIlVILNARY . SUBDIVISION PE-1753-94 TURTLE CREEK ) NOTICE OF . o : V'VTTH EXIS'TING URBAN RESIDENTIAIr-3.5 ZONING ) COr1fiINUANCE . .:M- T.. .`1APPLICANT: DAHM DEVELOPMENT,INC. ' t' The above matter coming on regularly for hearing, and the Appellant and representative of the '".i•.^~ , .`3b•~', v:. Applicant both requesting a continuance of said hearing to a date certain and the Board being fully; 'advised in the premises. , . NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County (Board) " v that the hearing on the above captioned matter, a proposal to subdivide approximately 39 acres into 101 lots, for single fanOy dvrellings and those uses permitted in the existing UR-3. 5 zone, on properly generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Barker Road and 8~' Avenue is hereby continued. : !y a NOTICE IS FIJRTBER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, ~ Washington, will conduct a continued de novo public hearing , . TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 1997, AT 5:00 P.M. - (or as soon as possible thereafter) ~ COMt1rIISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM . SPOK:.ANE COUNTY PUBLIC VVORKS BUII_,DING . 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOK:ANE, WA 99260 to consider this proposal along with any environmental impacts. ` Any person may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbally or in writing regarding such matters. The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessary. Further L-iforrnation can be obta.ined on the proposal and any environmental impacts by contacting John Pederson, Spokane County Building and Planning Department, at (509) 456-3675. The Board's meetings and hearings are conducted in facilities which are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particular information with respect to the accessibility of the Public Works Building, Commissioners' Assembly Room, please contact Rosarme Montague, Clerk of the Board, at . (509) 456-2265. . • • ,r" BY ORDER. OF THE BOARD this WILLIAM E. DONAHUE 25 day of March, 1997. CLERK OF THE BOARD r~+ ~ • ~ B ONTAGLJE, EP . I . ~ OISTRIBUTION: PLANNINGV/ LINDA/Mailing list Posf PE1753CONT. 25 . ~ • ; ; - 'Y o3 9.17 . `•`_::-2 i': . w`w AV(j ' 'r . . . . S PiOONE CpUNTy 'j Washington State Eastern Region Department of 7Yansportation 2714 N. Mayfair Street Spokane, WA 99207-2090 Sid Morrison Secretary of Transportation (509) 324-6000 • • • ; ~4 , . ,i • . . : ; , m v', ~ r ~J,~ i ,,.i:~:•`;•~~ry~`':~.r , : ~ : . August 14, 1997 , `i~~i4a:°` ~ ~`'~~',~~~G~~°Sy:~~ • ~f~~ ~;'-;l~? ~y,••r~'3' • ~.1~~9-' ~ ~ ~•'t9F.~ . r ^~~4y~ ~ 4L Mr. Paul Lennemann, P.E. Spokane County 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260 - ~ RE: Turtle Creek I-90 k' . Dear Mr. Lennemann: . ' ft., The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has no objection to the first phase, consisting of 21 lots, of the Turtle Creek development being finalized. : If you have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact Greg Figg in our Planning Office at (509) 324-6199. - Sincerely, ~ ROHWER . ~ ~ Regional Planning Manager - ~ , ~ _ .~t. . • :t~~ . • E - - seu i . *.y~''S rfl • a • ~ .,~'~~32~ . ~ W'w , A kr . ! r~!j~•~ 7J• • ; . s u' t`•.)`. •_'7.'Fi,"''F _ c. r~Z4'r I ' • - J! • F ' • " pP~•. .pRrlrNr J$*' :z , ~~~1'~ Ve r. tl~~ • ,,°_;~tr y Y`-+ p : ..c .~i;~`~,. . , • t,+ . T .'a ✓ UMMh1MMMM~IMMMM~lf~MMMMMMMMMMh9MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMhiMMMMhiM~lMhlMMMMMM~fMM1~MMMMMMMMMMMS0000~.h,. 3 Traf f i c Counts - - ; t.~;o o 0 0 -t ;nnnBnnnnnnnnnnnpnnnnnnnnnnnnpnFnnnDnnnnDnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn~nnnFnpnnnnDn,p:3.ooo ; 3Road hlarne vLocation 3Leq3 C0 Ltnt;~Z00Q~0~ ' : :-3PPPEPPDDnDnDPPPDPPPpPPDZ7PPPPnnEnPDDAPDnPnPDPDPPPPPPPDPDnZI PPFPPPEPpPPPPDp17390'00•-:_:: 3 16.• 8 T I-I AV 3at BAR k:: E R RD 3 E 3 ca 0'3-~:#~`I 30 0 0 A``-';"^~ , ; . J :1~• t j, ^+1^.,`1K. 3 1738TH AV (END) 3at SULLIVAIV RD 3W v 0 1 S132 t'a00Q,0' ' , ~#'r;:': 'R..~ 3 18,~8'fH AV ~:END:~ ;at HENF~Y RD ;W 3 0 0 31~34b (}.'0<<.4.: . ~ ^ 3 1938TH AV (START ) 30 ~at D I SHMAN -h1 I CA F~D E _ 3~ ~ ~{~;~;baQ 320..-~'~8TH AV (START) 3at- DISHMAnI-I"IICA RD `'W 0 4 0 ~.4z'',j 00; ,0:', ✓ . ,.r~ 600, O O O O p.i ; ~oooo ; 3 .~oooo ~ ~ ;00400 , ~l~Mr~MMl~MMI~M~+MhlMMMh~MMMMt~1~MMMMMr~M~tM~giMMMMMMMh~MMMMMl~A~Mt~MMMMMMMMMMMMM Pq 2/2 ''OQ~Q;~}=E • . 'op LJp3Sa.nq.le"Select row by pr~ss:i.nq CRetLtr-r~l or enter row number CEsc=1--Exit b~'°40*0`.. ?nnnnDdnnDnnn1anDnnDnnnnnnDDDnnnDDnnnnnDnDDDpnnnnnDnnnpDnnnn. nnnDDnDDDDDnpnnnnD'n.,~,1 - =sr-Exa.t F1-F-ielp Eriter--Se1ect Itpm AnyText-Seai°ch for text PqDn-Rlext Paqe IMMMrrMMMaiMMarMr~MMMMMMrrMMrrMMMMMMMMMTa7Ar-r- rc. cauN*rmmrrmmmmMmmmmmmmmmmmrrmmrrrrmrrmmr~mri~s`°'~'.:: . . , . RQ IQI D # 00c:.,i 0 .:i ' ROAD NAI'1E BAIRk::ER RD ' . COIJhIT 02642 3 , . DATF MAY 09 1988 J, RC]AU #k 04538 RpAD # 04538 FdCJAD NAME SPRAGUE AV ROAD NAME SPRAGtJE AV . COl.1NT 3 ~ COUNIT 02060 02279 DATE MAY O'D 198e DATE MAY 09 1988 ~ ROAU fk 00230 ~ ROAD IVAME EsARk.:ER RD CCIUhIT 02065 3 . DArE itiaY 09 1988 . 'MMMM~I M~iMMMN~~MMt~MMN1 MMM~lMMI~I~~t t~h~MMMfi1 ~M~9MNMMl~~~h~Mh~hPMMMMMNl~hlMM1~~9M~t MMN1l~hl h1 MMMMMMhf MMMM: ~:.-~.Y 1 Cl ICj oW,:i E nteY %':'S V 3 ..-ni 3 ..'"~i 3Co1 1@ G toY' 3 3 ' . Dnnnn~OnDnnnnI)nnnnnnnnDnnnnnnnnnnDnnnnnnnnnpDnDnnnnnnnnnnnDnnnnnnDnnnnnDnnnnnn4 .,c 1-Heip CF2-Concept Help F2-Options r6-Softk:eys F8--Clear F9-Save CF1O-Filter 3 . , . ; ~ ' ?y'. `~v C' S . 11'"f.'.'• 4]~', . Z :.y7> tt+ y . . yi~.r.~Y• ° .rij. ~ rV, r,• ./i.,4~`xY M • _ ` , S M' • ` ~ ~iv' , - . ' .~~:~~s WaSM111gf011 Stat@ - Eastern Region ' ~ Department of Transportation 2714 N. Mayfair Street , Spokane, WA 99207-2090 , ° Sid Morrison "N~ Secretary~t)f Transportation (509) 324-6400 . . RE CEIVE-D.: . . • . , • `y o L'! 0 C T 21 ' . October 25, 1996 •-p ' - Mr. John Pederson SPOKAI~E COUNTY ENGINEE~ f r~' , - _ t. l'1. ic• " . Spokane County Planning •'3. 1026 West Broadway Avenue - : fL . ~'l ' Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Re: Turtle Creek Final Environmental : Impact,Statement ~ 3 ~ Dear Mr. Pederson: . . . . - ; i-:'r; • - Thank you for the opportunity to review the above Final Environmental Impact Statement . N b . (FEIS). After reviewing this FEIS, the Washington State Department of Transportation ;(WSDOT) has the following comments regarding this study: 1. Over the last two years WSDOT has reviewed several traffic studies conducted for this proposed development by Inland Pacific Engineering. As a result of the August 1994 _ traffic analysis and the projected impacts to the Barker Road1I-90 Interchange a -Mitigated Deternunation ofNon Significance (MDNS) was issued which the applicant and WSDOT concurred uiith. In this agreement, the applicant agreed to design, fund, and construct a traffic signal at the Barker Road and eastbound I-90 ramp terminals. ~ Due to the"se previously established thresholds regarding mitigation in the 1994 MDNS, . and the fact that the project has not changed significantly, the same mitigating measures • '•~~';~i are appropriate for traffc impacts to WSDOT facilities. This fact is recognized on , -°~;Li Fage 9 or the FEiS, as miiigation that could be required of the Turiie Creek proposal. . . 2. The applicant shall fund, design, and construct a traffic signal system at the I- 90/Barker-Cataldo Ramp terminal, or participate with other developers in its installation if development timing allows such participation. It is the responsibility of T. the applicant to obtain all needed approvals andlor perniits for this signal system. This - signal system shall also be approved by WSDOT and Spokane County prior to its , installation. . ' . 3. Should this proposed plat be approved for the typical 5years, WSDOT requires that an update to the traffic analysis be done prior to granting of any extensions of time. . Updated mitigation may be 'required at the time of this 5 year review of transportation `infrastructure and impacts from this proposed development. This analysis shall be reviewed and approved by both WSDOT and Spokane County. ~ . . . - .~~.~t . , ~~4 .h). riy ~ r ' ' ' ,y•7.-,,~~.4; : :t a ♦ : q'T~yr } ' ~ , :,i;t . • i~p~ry`?/~€i' ' - ' ~,''i.\~• ~'1a• A7 t 1=~f~i;.A~F~~i-4~~ ]~7 - • . : t. ~ ' : ~ ~ °.r.~..;. •6'~~C-, ~ • - ` • ' -f~.`~;~:. Mr. Pederson October 25, 1996 Page 2 . . . . , . .y;' ~ . ~ _ •'Qi• ' If you should have any questions regarding these comments, please feel free to contact our -,:~.y:sf:._ ' Regional Planning Office at (509) 324-6199. ~ , ~ j~'~~~~. - y ~ ' • . ; 14 Sincerely, . P . . ~ f . Y . ~ MARK ROHWER Acting Regional Planning Engineer 1V1.[\.gjb - , .1: ~ oi . . 'r , t'~~ • ~cc: Philip Harris, Board of Spokane County Commissioners ~ John Roskelley, Board of Spokane Couaty Commissioners ~ . ~ . Steve Hasson, Board of Spokane County Commissioners Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers . ~ . Project file . . . . i S • , , • ' y1. f '~y~~ } v . • ' 1 , x . • ~1 ' F 3 . s . ' . ~ • ~ ,~4i, • • L' :I r~ o . i .i~~~ ' • _ . . . EIVED:Vy ,V~ fi ~'.^`%c• r ~ ~V ' ~ ' •l ' ~~rl~i!' . ' • . • ' • Y:t: • r'-;'~: ~ , i✓ 1 ~ pt. 1 ~ . S%1` } ` • C APR 1 7 1995 NO.~~ SPOKANE COUNTY EPJGINEER' • ''1`:r,?fi :K: {i . ,,.,~~ia w~e, BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH I NGTON • ~.~~j; - - - r, _ . , , . KTHE-_MATi'ER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY SV VDIVf • • • . 14•••i, YA' -,,t - SION PE=-1753-94 TURTLE "CR.EEK ) NOTICE OF WITH EXISTING. _ ~URBAN RESIDENTI AL-3.5 ZONING ) PUBLIC HEARING,, . ~ APPLICANT, . DAHM DEVELOPMENT;- INC . • •.ed~. ";,S•i• , . u. • , pJ',t;''J'~w. NOTlCE IS HEREBY GIVEN that th e applicant in the above matter, at the request of the County Planning Department, has provided additional information on the environmental impacts of the proposal with regard to those subjects identified by the Board of County :~=5' • a Commissioners in its dec;ision of December 20; 1994. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the responsible officia) for the Planing Department, after <;~a considering such additional information, has decided not to withdraw the Mitigated . Determination of Nonsignificance issued for the proposal or to require any additional mitigatirig conditions for the proposal. ~ NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing .F _ , . , TUESDAY, APRIL 25, 1995, AT 5:00 P.M. . (or as soon as possible thereafter) . . . . . - COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM - ; SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WQRKS BUILDING 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE, WA 99260 . . . ; : limited to considering the_.* additional _infarmation_ provided._ by _the applicant and the decision by the responsible official as described above. Any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbally or in writing regarding such matters. The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessary. The Board's meetings and hearings are conducted in facilities which are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particular information with respect to the accessibility of the Public Works Building, Commissioners' Assembly Room, please contract Rosanne n Montague, Clerk of the Board, at (509) 456-2265. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 4 day of April, 1995. WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD . ' MiA .,r . (.!1•~r d ,v~ .:i:.i',t ~ • '!Cyr#k t ' ` . 'r: . • . I •~J. , ~_i;~,''` ~,rk'i • S •.'i: B . 't~' ° R~ NNE MONTAGU , • - - . ' _ , - . . f DISTRIBUTION: PLANNING ✓ (~~~16'f'~~ ' , , PUBLISH: Review - 4/7 PE1753NOT.0328 . „ . • • . ~ . ~ • _ , ' . ' . . . . ' . t • ` ' . ' , • o. : ' •1~' ' ; •?3W11 . . . _ _ _ . . - IsL. •F . '~,.4's, , ~Y•, , , I - • , t- • _ . . - - - - - - Pat Harr__, County Engineers Of f ice u't ~ NO. 94-1376 , . : BEFO.RE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ . . i . INTHE~-MATI"ER tCONCE-R-NI,NG'`PRELIM,INARY . ) *AMENDED SUBDIVISION PE-;1753-94 TURTLE ~CREEK. ) NOTICE OF . WITH EXISTING.IJRBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 ZONING ) PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DAHM DEVELOPMENT;'INC. - . . . . . , NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that April Taylor has filed Notice of Appeal of the approval by the Hearing Examiner Committee of above captioned application for Preliminary Subdivision PE-1753-94 with existing UR-3.5 zoning; and . . l~•~~ , NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will conduct a public hearing , TUESDAY, DECEMBER 6, 1994; AT 6:30 P.M. (or as soon as possible thereafter) COMMISSIONERS' ASSEMBLY ROOM Sf?QKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE, WA 99260 to consider this proposal 'to develop approximately 39.14 acres into 101 lots for single ~ family dwellings and those uses permitted in the existing Urban Residential-3.5 zone on property . Generally located at the southwest: corner of the ~intersection of Barker Road and 8th Avenue in ' the SE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that-a topic of discussion at this hearing may be any environmental documents prepared in conjunction with the proposal. ' NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony verbally or in writing in support of or in opposition to this application. The Board reserves the right to impose time limits on speakers, as deemed necessary. The Board's meetings and hearings are conducted in facilities which are accessible to disabled individuals. For more particular information with respect to the accessibility of r; the Public Works Building, Commissioners' Assembly Room, please contract Rosanne Montague, Clerk of the Board, at (509) 456-2265. ; i BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 11 day of October, 1994. WILLIAM E. DONAHUE CLERK OF THE BOARD ; . . . d , ; . , - ~ . BY: ~~'r`_~ ~ . ROSA~NE MONTAGUE, DEPUTY DISTRIBUTION: PLANNING ✓ NANCY ✓ PUBLISH: Review - 10/14 PE1753NOT.10-11 ~ Evw1753v,n ~ . .3~ ST 0 F F I . . ; ~ ,t;.::;~~• - ~ ~ _ -l~ T(f) 0 • • ; AL Y ` Z /.v • , ~I T I N Y'' ~ U ~ c~ d , i . . J ~ • . ,~i 00~ "~u • . F . , cc . Q • ~ . L 2N0 AvE. ~ ' ~ • • • ~ 2 nd^v • ~ . . . . ~ r„ • ~ ~ Y N S Ro, 1~ t~de.. • Q . •:.ann. ~ , URT V V FOURTN AVE. -:o;~• , ' . . , _ . . , , . ~ ~ ~ - ~ - tt.t~ ~.~.~A y,s. . ~ ~ ' f• ~ , ~c ~ 44 , I LD . . ~ a v~, \ ~EIGNTN AvE. r- , . . . . . .1 ✓ `~i;:. .'•6 <ad,•.'•; ~ :e•u ; f ` ~'~(t`%% %~~;':y r' :S z-<~' ~ i~.'••~o>:' ::t~,~ ;:~;f ~b:c~~ J fJ: y:Y 4.r'r}i ; ~..;T : , ~ ~il~'' ~;t:,':+.•;; !>u ~ ~ `.%r,~~.t~'.;;i; i " ' r;c';: r,- • ;%ft~i,~...; F,};.t~:,5,i~t:1.: t:i; ~'•~t ~,;~i : oil~:jf.~ ~~,v~.~ ~;q':..i., g,r~i~`5~ ~ C . .R ~'r ` 'S ~ • 4,^; : yk ' •,r' co 'R:;~; ~3~i ;S ~';i ' ~ '~~f,: ~V'~~ ~n'f'SF'Si' .S'/r ~Y'~•': ~ ~ ,;S1•(K"~;:.;~~;,~: , if::. . • 4:C~ %"i'}i{i.'•'~~~S f >{„'~:~4'~,`;~~ . `~•v i; :;:;y;f`;:,J::'''r'~iri;:~'.., K't4;~;~;..y..;i.<~3?r:l,:;;'a{ Ot , i <~.i~r:r '),~c•i G < .;Z^l~.••Y ~ . ; `i <i. o ~.3 ~ ~~itf ).~y ~ ` + ' v • ' • ~i<i~ ~ . ,Yy4 ~'~•:?.if~i`'i.i1iF';:~ ~ ~i:'{• k~~'vj.i;:•►.Qy •ri~: "S{ ~it:;f ~y. • . ' . . , - - CY cr ~ C~ - ~ ~ - - - - - ~ ~ _ _ _ . ~ . Ln ~ ~ - 2 ~ . m ~ ~ Q ~ ~ N N " v • N ` . N r ' ITC)•,ti ;~F ~ y~~- - . PACE__...!~ Ig- . • ~Y1 ~ 1 ~ •yl.,• ~1 ~ ~ . 1 . \ . ~ . j ~,?4 ~ ~ r. . ~ ^~t' G ' . ~ . , i Jt . • ~ • / . . 1- . .7 • j . . . ~ • .x at _..:...._:..._._.-_.__._._...uce.~..._...-:~..,. _x_ .f. ~ • • . ~ ~0 U . , ; . • ~ . ~ _ _ s s• . ry . . Y 4~ FROWOMNIFAX TO:UTILITY SPO 28, 1994 2:40PM P.02 ~ . - . _ _ • RECEIVED . ~ •y • ~ • . TO THE BOAFiD OF GOUNTY COMMISSIONERS I~~VA11 ~~Pf!}~Ilffi7f~14C APPEAL FEE - -$210 . r ~ NAiVIE:_1%s,s?\91 TO DAYS DATE c«~ !~~'tv~t s~«~►~~►.s 5~,cac . . ADDRESS:~~~ ~~~~-tn~<d-~c.s ZIP COUE ~ . ' HOME Ph#ONE: BUSINESS PHONE: - ~ HEARING EXAMINER AC710N BEING APPEALED , , ..-r.°_ :~"~ev.r~.-.s~~+..~-..'S7,k ~ ~ L ~.?'i. PRELIMINARY SUBC}1VlSIf.~N NAM_~-i'' PRELIMINARY SUBaIVISIQN NUMBER ~ . ?ONE RECLASSIFICATtON NUMBER U~4=' HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ACTION ~ • , ~ ' SIGNATI}RI--- 0~ APPELLANT r ~A - SIGNATURE OF Al1THORfZED REPRESENTATIVE ADaaESS , YUUR REASaNS FOR APpEAL ~~~5(`.~htf Uu,e_ (~t 3&.)[1 (`r,i1+V!I.Si'I• Gi.A.? ' ~ ~N A>Gi C ~ t' r--tr [ P vu 1 CC s c~ ` • ~c C `i tAr •~•C~ ' c ~ ~ • 1 ~l C C~LVS { 5 . ~1..3i~~, F~ r~►~ye~~.sJ.;~ti~~47~~.~~ c~ C~e~~ l a~~;~,x,v~n~►.~ ~~i cl< <<> ; C c:~1N~~,r:i c... ~r~~T~v.yn ~r.~J~cti~ .1.V~n~~t~G~ t~~ v~np ►.a Y• ' ~1~yC~ •~1 ~ G,[~~~v~c.;~ 5~1~._~.~:..V~t'cy'~.~C \ ~.,,i,? S ~i i~ _~(a ~L~V ~ ~ 7 f ►~V ~I Sv ~^PS c;,w~(;~ ~ ~ C~-- ti-_,~~ U C..~ l 5~,,,,~.,C. ~J~l 1 C~.l P G~l~ 1►, ~ C? ~ ~ FaPI oFFIcE usE oNLY . ~ Copies ta: P:anning Engineers Environmentai Health Fee receivad; Check Cash Receipt Number , n a ~ Hear'rng Date , ti- ~ ~ . - ~,Rj l'!~, ~ K •~p; :Y, C'~n-. . '•~~.y~.r . f ~ . ~M "as ~f. i , ' •.P.'~~~. ♦ - • C ~ ~ • . • , ~ - , • ,•a Si~1e / ~j j S`'~ M 4•'v •j`~ ,(7 . c~ ~ _ _ _ _ i'!}C(( i N~~~ir . _ ~ A~~II~~~~~`~~ ~ •n'~~ 7~ ~ ' ~Y 'f.I. -J ~ \ ~ Ie~ $ - 1 • S~ ' ~ i+'. • ~ r • ~.h,~.i;:ti i•:2~ •'a y . , ~ r ` ~ - ` ~ ~.-~.~r ` • ~ ~ . - - P _ _ ..i•:~r ~ , . ` , ' r•. 3 y ~yt ~ ✓Y ` • ' ~~i."t'~;;ra: f C ( / ~ f • . - s 793 Y ' f r / • ` ~ . , - t _ T . ~ v `A`~•~.~ . . ~ v% ' ~ ~ • s _ "a...p«ti ~~Y~-•~ . ~ A _I l ~ kr ~ 1~`~+'-. ~ O ~ ~ \ yT ..zi' ~t'• ~ = ~ . . . ' . _ _ _ ~ ' • ' ' Ad s+.ri y' • r `t~ ~ ~ O . y~o . ti ; th • ~ ~ ~ f~ liir ~c°' ~ - • - . t ~ ~ ~ _r i ~ ~;ni. " ;.i A ~_~ik rr - r. - - - -t - • =-a'.~ - ~ _ _ _ _ , ~'--'~~1 1 _ _ , ,L..~~r ~ ~r • _,~'o~~ , i ~ • AAC~Ad (/~%~~i~_ r ~ , • ~ ^ e ' ' ` . ! _ _ _-4 , • r ~ '~~Y ~ • „ ~ • . ` : ;;-a:~ _ i ~ ~a~ . ~2• ~ • . . ~ ' .s ~ • , l `~~~t'nt}~5,~ ~ \ ~ ~LC• i. ~ - " ~ , `'~~r ~ =v-lr .F I _ - ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . _ y . . ~ ~ v . -~•L3~ I: . . a ~ L ♦ J. { ~•,•\~t,•~ IG _ ` _ ' _ _ ' ~~~~1 ' " ' ' . ~ - _ _ ' ~~t~:~ ~ : '•j~.~„'''' y ~ ^ / ir• 6Yy ~ + •`~i",~~ • ` S - t • t '~t> ~ _ . ~ ~ ! ~ . - ' , ' ' s • . _O • .^t: - p;ti~',:"i .~.n. A~ ~••"v.T, ~ ~ ` ' ~ ^ ~~w~~ :i; • , . ^n ~ • , • r •T~, , _ _ t'A; •~7 ~ 1 ' , _ ~ _ o ~ _ ' _ _ ' - _ - _ ' ' - ~ <~~~~~^~'~C~y`-~~~;. _ ' - - • , . 0..3~ ~,r/ - ~ -:j ~ ' • f~ . - . - - - - • . . . _ .4 eol ! - - - - - - - ~ • ( _ _ . . v ~ ~ ~ . ; . . 1 • - - - - - - - _ ~'~Jl~! ~ _ f _ , ..~X r'~,1~r'~,,.rs: • } I ~ ~ ' C..~ate-9 / A 3~ r~ _ . - - - - ~ - - - _ " ~ ~ ' - _ > _ £a • ! ' - - - ~•mI ~ _ y_ . ~ k _ - _ / , • = 7 •~•~•1 ; /^tri~ 9'✓ a ~ * S . I _ u ;t,~r ! r A a~:. ~ D • e • . ~rC., ~ -E' ' - .~4~~lr~Qi✓~ - - /C ~Q . ,a < ^ l .t . . - ~ ~ ~ . , ~a . - - _ . « . - • ~ - , , ^R +F . _ ~ y. ~ . _ _.~r - - - . - - . - - - . ` . . . x,- - v - -~:r~ , . ~ . . • - - ' - _ - . , _ '~.C.• ` c O~~ ~ 'i r• y r» - - - - - - - 1~~~ - ` • ~ N~ - ' • ~ ' . . v-- _ ~ - - - - _ . - ' C4, i ! - - - - ^~1/~• - - ~ - ~GL}`-'~''* ~ - ~*~"f - _ ' ~ s~~~ . v~. 3 05' ~ ' f "G ~ '4 `.1; ~ . • ' ,l . ~1M" ~ i.. ~ ~ ` , " , • ' I~. f _ ~ _ . . - - At~•~- e i ~ ~~'~:~~t _ ;1►~. t Y,';~: . . ~ - _ _ - - - _ - - - , ~ . '~_"r`7` ~ ` r~' . 4~t1L,N+^,~" .`-.~3•~ - - ~ . , w`~ j✓ _ `{~a.~'~• . ~~ty . 1 ~ ~ r - - ' . ~w~r,.-,~- Ctj:.,-'.;' ~ r. ~ ` ~ - . ~J. ~ ~ f • :4 j;~~l~ F . . ( ' . _ ~ • ' • . 1 -OAA V tl _ . • Jj/ / ` t ,k , ~~.~~~.~~~V • ~ ~ ~ ~i i`i . .V'~ ( ~ F~~• r1~~ l ~ ~F~l~ ~ x•F} . _ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ _ I iIY ^ .-a u '//r;~ ' ~ n , ~ ~ t•L `J` _ ~.Q - - - _-~r ~ `~!Z-~ ~ : - - - . .'Yl_ atu~ z ' ~ ~ ` _ - - - - - - • - - - - - . ~ ~~.~~v~ , - - - - . _ ~ 1 ' Ae `rVti_. ~ ~ ~ ~L+AL.' • ~ . ' ' _S ~~~~~astc .~':i uo,~ _ ~ . / V ( _ - V v • , ~-%t~--Er~':r✓~~ I - - ~ - - ~ ~ . , , , ' ~ • - . , . _f - - _ _ , _ ~ ~ ~ - ~ r . ~.1,:•~:~. ' . ~ ~ 50 ; ' , . f ~ ~ - • - - - - - - t~- . Y - -y , . '`~~~'.ir I ` • - c'~: A. r..s'''~ ~ ` - - - - - . `I• I ~ . . . - - • - - - ~c_ . ~ . ~ _ _ , ~ - - . _ . _ - - - - - ° ~l-- - - - - - - _ J. _ % . . _ _ _ _ _ ~ - - - - ~ - - - ~ - - - - - • - 'V''t - - - _ , _ , _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ \ l ` . ~ a' ' _ - ~ • • ~ ~ ~ :a..-V~dZsr~ .a..~•t:.:~'`, ~ ~ , , , . , , , ~ ~ ► , ~ , . I ~ I i~ 1 ~ 1 ' I i i ! ~ I ~ ~ I ^ I 1 r I ~ I J f • ~ . ~ ~ I ~ ' ~1 d ` ~ M , . ~ Lt ~ -i ~ ~ ~ • ~ • , 1 r r ~ ; ~ • . , . . ~ , ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 a 1 ~ ` " i, ; rl ~ •1 ' y~1. i•, ~ . ~ r . . . . i r • ~ ,~w, = ' ~ ; , , ~ • . ' y : M., i;, .;~,,,,f~ _ , c ~ ~ • ~ i,~'a, , ~ ~ , ' ' , ' 1 t~i,~~° , t~ ' • • , • A., 7, . . :t"~ r'~"• ~j . 'JT"1 ± ° _ • 'i' ~•%1~~~,; J g~~, ~ , • ; o , , • ~r`~y.'"a • , ' , ~~:Y~ .~a. ~ ,;~'t,? r,''...~~ ' , A'4,!} ~`~y' .i..~~ ~ ~1r tl1' , "~S•~ .i" da 4j, r•y-~r ~ "h ~ ' ~ • ~ ~ y~ ~r~~. t~, ~i'~ i r'1 '~t`,'.,. ~ > T? ~ , . b ~ . . i i.if . i ~ • ~ ' , . : i "1?r`;l~i .i ~ . :.'~i;~ ~ xl., ' . i ; S'~ , . i w r' -a.~1~. 'W ~ , ~ , A 't h • t~ P♦ ~'V~~t, . r~ ~1r ,~~f,`, . ~ , . ~ ~ ~ °a~a~:i. , t4 ,~rwq . `~t° `'~~y+~~~t p 1 ~j"~;~~~", • ;•'~i~'t ~ • ' ~ ~'.,7 ''i%~,. r. r;` : " l,,r" ' t y~i • ~ ' , n' ' . ~ ~ ~°N ~1r; , '~~ti. ,q h -Y, 1,J~ , , ' , n... . . ' fiy i ~,~~i} ~ ~~;~i~l' ~ ^ • a. , i . . ~i ~~l. ♦ ~l~ K . i ~ ~ ► Ja...:'~~ ifi'~ ~,7~~':E~~ ~'~~~5~'~5;;~~" ' i . . . , y.~• q... 7 , ~ • . •n< - ,.'i.~> :r' : . ~ . iV ~ V~• . L • I 1 ~ i~~~ ~'it 1'~ ~J , ' ;'Ny ~ ~,~~i.~l~'f~~~r'i~.? Ti:.~,~•` ' ` • ' • fi~~ : : a - •r, ~ . LJ _ ed' P, F : t ' ~ ' ' _ ` " 't • ~L' `r•~ • I ; . .Y. ~ ' • j~}~ ~i. - f _ _ ~ z ~ ~ ; t~ ' ' • . i - - _ ' . not - • - - ' ` - - _ - .,F - " - - , • > t.•yJ '2~`.~ ~ . . : . J ( t , ~~S' •t•~' ' . ~ . . . , _ _ s - ~ . _ . ,li-~°- - - - - r _ . _ : ~ • ~ - _ . ~ - ' •~YG' .x : ,{V- a, . ~ . - ~ o,~._ - - ~ - • . ~ .~,•~.1 I ' , " •y•;•~•~~.~t . _ ~ 1 i Y' -I - - _ ~ ~ - - ' ~ - . _ - ~ _ 9 ' i . . o _I_ _ . _ ~ ' • ' .L~: R ~ ~ ' ' ^ ' ~ _ ' ~ ~ .e . . _~..o. ' _ . . ' ♦ , . . I _ _ ' e. _ ~ ~ ' ~ . _ _ ~ •~v~,~ 1 . . i :;f'rt,:•j'. t^i. _ -4 3 i+. . t~a3e ~ - ;2•..a . .i ~ ~ • _ a ; . ~ , Y a - r1~s , L ; ~ . 't:.."- ; •ti . ~,y ,r~ ''P 4`.:.: ~ , .r~.., :t~ - . z;'~-} ' r . K `i, - .~y rl ~ ~ • ` 4 ~ i a ~ w-•~,',~ T P - ~ . ' ~ ; c~.- •3'ui • ~ . Pt.~ S-T OFr' 'S'~ - ~ ,y'G• C,J . ~ ` ~ = re..'! °tif-=x! • . , • ~ • v~ r`~„ •4«;. 1~.; ~ ~ 1 S O • ~ 0 l.) • ~ j . y _ ( ~ . , t'~'~rK~Ta ~ w~~• ` ` , • e S o , ~ ~1 ~ ~ J ~P • •:o~ ~ ' / . ~ 'v n`~i.t..-. ' r'• QQ Q /a,vS. o s 1ST~j . 0 ~ ~ U , ' ~ ,4. ';;i :..4°j^~ ~..x.'`'.,~ ~ Y cv • . 2.nd . Q ~ 0 uRTH x~a.r~"af•,r!r! . : ' ~ , . ~ ~ F ■ ~ - .f~.u,*~,,r~ ' (~R.~ d . , . r• ~.x . f. ' `t• .oni~~fx i . . ~ ~ . . • i;# rA~Y6• ~ • 'y'~; :~:"-';~'f~i LO . "~~.~;y. ~ ~ ~ ~ cFf~,d}~~p . ~ ~ • ~ GHT N AvE . ~ • z~ . ~ ~ ~t~'1p,~; • '~.Y {:'r,'v:;i~'r,'. . ,`'?y?'i" ~ co - :;s,+.i:. ::''r,' :r e a:~• ~ :'~,'~e,~,T,;` ~Y • v ..v.:+::.''.,• . ~-4~:~.•::.. '••S.r. ~:~~v;yi•.c,..... `c:t~t~+` S . ~'~#,r't,i~': ~ :`,.-;;:;:i;'~:;.,.~;.:~'"''' :;~:•t~. ~`i::x::,:",3^{~.,,~,;•`: ;:t~r':: • ,r• c . ~ ~ ; <i•' :rr`{: < ~ ca{ ' 1 l , ~r. V . :eti ''%i~:i>;~:~• :r:;.~ ~y . , 1 .`~~i.~+.,: %:v:~.;':f:~:F,'b•ti ':;:fi:.:i:..~...:'::'•}{j~;;:. t~ '~:',~LY:; ;:•?f= j: ' J : .f~ :}ti%, ~ '^`,~j~~ J,~ ~ .:~1.'~~::::' ~'4' Y;{~y~~`x•1•:~ , I' • {.'bY{i.};:~ti:yi; ':•??~:.},::.tiK•;~~:~':~:~~' ,t~ '`~3.~-.,. ~ ',~~n'ir~• 5}~~7:~:} .,f~r,r,:r:•,: ~.1:.. ~~t?Sj~~. ~y~::;:}}::..;:.:•...•:;', ~@L}.~~''".;v:'•''• . ,~`~4~x~'yi~ . ~r- ~t ;.~l~:::;~y ::;-03,::::;,;•~ , ry }i ' ~~1ix;' • :`~+:,:::ti : k~ ~ .yCn ; ~-Ni~ ~'~`r ,":~+rr:~ .:i.~','7i:ty::•' ;:~$?>:ti:?<f:'`, • ~i`'.~'.n~~~ . i:: `:..~ti.'~ ,1 . , •:5::~.!')^Y,~,t ~ . ~ ti :'~11~` rl~~''~.G ~ ~ ~ • ~ a~ ~ ~ co • ~ 'r:~~N , r ~ ~y • ~1 YI ~ ' • OD O's . . ,-yy . t i. v N ~ . - . N J N ' ~ ~ c . ~ I . +f-,•' f~ P a9e ort for PE-1753-94 . ~ ~aa HEC Staff Rep ~+"''~,~'i • '"'.;,,.`i ' ` - / ..j y`~.,,T 4~~'~`,42~; `~r'~~•~`s~,~;~i A"'! _ ~ 4 ~ , ' 59' ~ x .r~w. L~~~`. ej~,. ~~x~' Y• -•y~: ' ' '~~da~lr+`rT i', +~l =.'t'is '~~.-f : - 53 00 ' i~~~ ~ :t;"~.~ •?.;y',. ;,t • - x+ Sfj.' ~ ~ -y , - , A•~Y~ f. w'S~, , •N. •M. . ' ~1~~ •~Ii'tt1p Y:.. 4,_ ~ V'f"s'1~j rt~~ " `t * .,~+5 ' - ir ' 7+~Y ~ ~ ' ~ . t'~4 ' ?~f , - " o a • ~ i~*~}~r~z ~:r'iY ~ ~ . ~ 1 ,G• ~ ~~a~ 1 : ' ~ O • 1" ~ cJ , ~~:-~~jt e'°~~ ` •r ~ i , ;1 •t t 4.. O uR_ ' . . , ' ZZ o ~ , . - •~1~, ~~Z ~ . _ SE,-qN . , r~~~ • ~ z p ~ , `.C N t` . ~ ~ ~ , ,~s; ~ - : • ~ ~ £ r ' a fn F o v,~t T N f jjgjl~ll moop y~ Z r A . • ~ v . - V • -T d . A,E `o . 3 Rp ~ . I Qs . flo ~ • ~ . r , . - . " y. t- y; ~,g~ • 4~4 _...w' y~ • - r ~ ` . . ~ • a S . . ► N, Av E OPO . , .;s..,ti.:.. ~ ' ~ G •~~=;;.:;;;,,;:..':.;:.;:::;::~;:r:~::.; ~ • ' r'vl ti : : ti{..•:;• .c,,,~.:Y:Y:: 4r. ~ , ~ ~I ~ : ~ ,~V.`~~ r. ••j~::.: k f~~~~'t.' t~F"~r{: ' r;<:}.v;:{% ''?::''•{}:'v:<,y;%"'•i:::2':%.ti~:t•',.:r::•'.:_: :::i~:,,'.tii} `r::}~. t. :v::::i:•.:•::.::~}~`?..:;~ ~~ti:,ri. 4 ~ ' 3 tii:'.{ ti..~ .•ti:~: ~}~'.jtin:~'•:':t'+'i}iv':: :x:, . ~'S' ~ 1i;. .}•..:v::,%:~"h~ :~':{:::ti~}'•:':,ryr?.r}. ~iv..N. •,-{•••;:i.. ~ ~ r ~~''•~:~'i;1}:; i'•,{~.,;~.{..r ; i'}.:i;{.%:r :.v.:::•_::~:.,.,ti•{. . • . "~`~'.r ° • ' V • ' ~ a~~ 1 i{.1:.~ ~ ti~•~•:~.1•:: ':`.~:.:~.1:.;::•~+,'.'~4: }1ti ti~ t•:..~.~;~:: ~ ~ t~ 1h ~ _ . ' 1'• ,,f . f'!::li~'.~-.~:.~. ~ ~ }l.\f: ~ L• . • ..ti•.~...~..: • P. 4 ~ p , ~,.{;~':v?i,'~ : •>+'•:'.:K.::.: i.::,'•ri:.<:,:ti;::;;:,.-.s~~'.' O .5-. .f. i~.::.}:;~,•.:•{.<~n ~ R . " : . F _ . • - 'r-:.. t,}~,r ~ ~ ` - :~:~;~;i::.': : • .~a .~..,.5:•:• . •.;:::::;;:r;:;;;~, + ~;Y, . . • v ~ ~ r ~'•`xt; Gt~ . 1 t}1'rc ~"~.'aq'N q ~ ~ ~ c MR,, •~«Y: ~r a. ~'~~~~v~~..~'~t ~ ~ ~ ► `~Y`'•i ~'t`~.~~.~,' 1 . ~ ~ ~~1Y ~'~~4' • t~S~ . ~ C>~ „~'•r t ~ff L~ ~a i~~ a i ~ , ~ 7~ • ~~y~d; ~4~kr ~ . ' ~ . t:• • N~;;•~!'~'•i L ; ~ - ' + • co . ~ , ► ~?~•:~4r~~~{ 't;• . t ' c~' ~ "'t-• ' ~ SRA t~•~~::~~a~ ~ Pa9e 9 ~or 9E-1753-94 rt Repo 1 • 9 ~ ~ ,~ars I '~E~aGRESr ~ 10 PMM pAS5tA0~'S ( P~ I P~ ~ PARQI I 1/~ I ARCd l V1At6 PMpI I 1h~ ` 7! tt I.I~E I r^ r ( l '.t I I~ 7lIII,061) ~ 75101.OE21 I 53191.0671 I 9llllp7g` 57111Al20 ~ 17It1.OW1 I 17111.OOJ2 , 11111A{30 I~ 571f1A671 5l191,OOIC ~ t ~ ` • I ~ ~ ~ j r Li p,tcow 1 ~.LL- ` , - S h•, ♦ \ ~ I RSRObG1101 I I ~ ~r~_~~~~._...-_••-.-a.~=•_~- -~-E_ a,^ r I r o 1*' 'I 1~I, ~uCC,,,^E1' m _ , ~~.+J---,~ ~ ^w.~ w ~ 34 n N.°4, _ ^ ~ _ ,a """1^~_ °3~_~, `SL ' •s~~ f W- A'ti ~ ' ~ ' ~,_.A 5 • , . c-+ ' 'r4„ t~' ~ s./ ~ ~'~7 ~ B ~6 9 ' 10 '4 j~ 11 ~ i ~ r'B~ O ' ~ "a"' i ~ / " ~ •26~1 .~5 i ' 'rm°_".`„r . a . .h ~ • ~ d ~A...~ 4 1 ~ . : ~ . f r,; • :i~' .2~ ~ .~`.o •t) faQ.•.k~ . . i ~ ~NnK '>'•'?A , ";~w.. ~ ~ ~ j~ 13 ~ 10~1. }a l2 1S . • ~.ir ^ " ~ • ~i ~^L4,'. ~N ~f . 19 18 A.,ty I ~ 16 N \ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ • , r r ^ . (D l, •,s ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ „ ~ ~y:~ 1~, Q k tv' ~ : ' _3 19 t 20,~•21'..~1 ~ 23 O ~ + ~ M : . ' ' `~~~~1\~ IS ~ , 2„ 0 ~11LN4 8 ~ 7' ~,.B;~i°•~~,Z't 4) C~ t' C+ } - t' _ ti ~ ~ - ~ ' `i ~ , , • ; ~ ~ ; . I ~ ~•~3' ' y~ l ' " ~ li,lt~~\' ~t,~♦ ~ ~18 `17~,I 16'9 •'"~•;f • -i1 , y toQ O -5 U~+P - ~ , ' ~ i t . . • _ ;~y : a•-~- . . ~ ~ ,1 ~ t • I , r{,~ ( tti 11~ _ ~ • a . ~ ,~r %r~ ~ ~ - ~ - ' - = - - _ i ~ ~ ~ m SiTE DATA . ` ~ •w _.3 ~ _ _ ' ¢ .~~?r I . F-~ ~ ,1 ~ _ - ~ i` _ - r~. IECAL DE9CRIPTION nma~w~+rw a runu cna . : _ ~ _ ; ' ' V. _ ` ~ - ~,c . _ - . • • ' ':`=e : . ~ nw oarrX" a na u 1/6 a scrna w r . A. u c~ .x h na W co„m o aacwt surt a rAwnc~a uiho a K..r or nc rouan+a ~ ~ ~ f b`~:tir, ~ , ` a f~•' ' ` 7. 1 ~ : u~.'o u ra'r a. vn ss rcar mn a tmo a s~i tt u lQ » ~ooT *tt am+ aaa a ,w ~unuo mc rwn~ wn~t _ / • ` ~ • ~ ~ I u v aa ~ ~ ~ a oacx !wc ~oA oE9hCem Nro COM~MD Cr o[ID rSOOADfD ` l` s, 1 2"- =,jr • • ~ ~ ~ N SPORNrt COtNn', wr90410v, N+D A I! f06f NO[ SSAf 4t WQ ItNG hO~N' PMCQ Ao rt ma ro,rA suo to roor ~,ot orta~ no~rt ar ~ur. ~s ocso~co uNo ObM1m 6t ECm IKC0~0m ul 0001 a77 0~ GOMIS~ P.t( u4 a SvOflr4 EC p ~ ~ OOVMf. Ml3NNCTM N i}tL }L 1/4 0/ f[CiION 19. I~ ~ 35 NORIK M1V10[ lf [AST. ttIMQ~C~n,Q~ low,~-WXM , ti.!'•.,~,°~. r nm+t xu*sui CENERAL ro'K ruu W. ~ ZONE A6 FL000 PWN rorK aa 3au ~v ~R ' 1~1 xa auT Mu • ~'I 1 ` BOUNOARY pS~(E.0 ' ~ • ' toTK wwea a tan is Wn ra "at ~ . . . ,o class ooam' ~ M~W Usf LZf wRfS (t0.00~ url s.F, to 2tA27 tIJ e»iu'i arvu 11~`V r ' I vuen (eo~ wi, m 1369 M 3s +xrr oo~ ~ meG~astAU ~a~~ • r ~ ~ , f 1~ ' . +v~ w WunPr.sa+ ~ aa ~un fJAf OOt CA0.t . •.Y^ _ ~ , ~ % I . IA O ,A UiK51 NLO sPOan os rRoJEcT OCAhON , y + { pw a rwwwa rt. w ~ , . I l . souTw ia ixru wrt[ 213 SI(KOp.04cy( RnAG A4~vrN6S~ IO1M ` I 1 V • I 1 h i~h j ff, ; ~ ~ ~ ' naru laoot u,-37" PRELIMINARY PLAT 4l1FtVEYDR'S CERTif7CA1E OF ~:~3 ~LI L TUR~ti''..E CREEK M • ?+i ~ . . . . . ~ . t ~ ~ LOCATED IN- 'fE~iE N .1/2 - QF SE 4 'O,F ~ it oafr/ f 0 ,,.,t.,~w,w,~ ~ `4° SECTION 19, T.25 N., R.45 E:)W.M., uM. w.i ~ t M ~ ~ SPOKANE:.COUNTY, WASHINGTOI~y' p JU,1VE ~~1994 i~~:fr~'' ~ ~ MNU: USCS. ~ ' INLAND - P . y, c~ra,R ~K , rom ~ ~ REVISED A(JGUST 1'994 Y~.zw EMG~~O V. ! a'\~~a~'4=,.+.*e~ `r.... rn~ rw pal r►MNr ; r, , . • ~ -ti, 1, c. ~ • t >..i D~ ~ ~ r ir,rY" • , { ~ f}. F, ~'t`.~ • ~~~y, 'rn- . . .r~!' '.r;'' ':~{;~i,; ~'~f~~ ~~~~j~ r,~~„t~~ '~~Y'~;1~~}~~{(1"~ ~!5~,,,4~»`~~;~~ n - ~n. i ~ ~4• ~ ; 1 i 'J,'! 16. Y ~ ~.f r(~1, . t •~d)i"~fr~',~J~,~.t3:,I,j Z; ~ •1^ `y, i~ . w ~ •N . a..'y ~ . ~j . cy ~ ~ ~A ~'eJd i 'yt~'~' ',~1~I,qT•Vi,~ ~ . N A y;u. `x "~1~,~,a~~~.~y^ . ,+'~l"~R'Y` , 'nli; '4, ~ ~ ~p Y • 3~j,~ ~ .Y l n " ~ $ ♦ r • A`+'+ti'~;, v~ :y'.r" :G±~'• .1,~ 1, !J~• ..1; ^ 1~ n ~kr c `,r1 r. • ' ~ ~ •N,ig e;'.~' a•.:;~'e ~P,l'i~:~ a:. tiL.`j 7s. 1:, Dr ~ tt '~^F"a '~r~'a~~~~'•~''., ~f~. ~ d;~w~7 ~J.~> ii~ , [ * . ; , ' ~r ;tY! Y~•'.: , .a .~+r~.~ 5'N ^'~_.:ii.,a .'r ~ty ~el i 7;., ti J `S ~ "3 y~~ ,J.:~' y >"'':5.. , Sr(~ .f~ r. ~{s¢}~''S" tit~ ~ s" v' ^.y'a'.i , ~L R~Sf','~i x• l e l `~~'~,{":'`~~~i ~ t. t ~ ~i ~ e' ? S"°:,~. ~;'~i:.r?~,'~ f: , b' , ♦ .,i~1' " '}'^~:i . ,1, ,a`,. ~i~~{' ~ y.', r ~ e^.' ' -~+ia':~. P , r o~ J~+~ r~e~;'..~~ * i:R J 1•~.~;` ~,r« .v=L' •"1'~-`T ~ jj•,. --r, 'Y.ti: v'~'ins v:i..... 4: '`k1"° ;'-~~Y~', i~~4•~y ~c, , ' ~~,~,~,~{r;•'1x .s~,~A.;.>~L,_i•' - t,'v: Y.~. 1i~ ~ s~f a ~ t4: `~~F' ..u: ...4 • ~i'~...~ ~ - 9,,+'~tiit~...-~ ~.r?i, f?t~c.~ r= 1ti t~ t;: •.i.,' ~ e ,'i r ~ ^it~... ~ h ,rr • ;t. wa~'r +~r 3~ . •~~+hrrA~"~~'+~'~p;;yr.~~4p:~t~ ~r,f3~ d'~•~:,~I'~."~ t~; •5.~..C~•r • •t,, 'r': ,`«'3~'ya~:^i~~,i.:'~9'r`:a~.,t4' . S.ia'+b:. ` '2: . ~ ~.h i ~ . y~ aG f:} F'iq~• : "i "~1:, ,ya.v u~.'?K'e~~ :t_ . ~:rn...wrt'd~~~'^. : :b~ ~ ~'.ee'~.da±i'.~r, ;..i9.:w•. ~ ~ii: ~ ~ i•vr;;)cJ.:,'--' -7 c,.'~C•s~-~ ..C.•i•~~s',r; r~.. i'• fi~ b _ ~~'„T ~ 7~,~(wt t,` ~ ~S`+ . dS •~.'..y. ~~J • x ~C ~P .t f('-,~ `-a~~'~•' , .f„~-t -fx'•'~ ^i i'..Ss . i' ~ '~~'t? T •.i i~,w ;~~f~v^`. ~ . ;~>;~:.t"~:~ : tr:~ ''r ~•.q~'- o , ~ r • . hwt~ . y' . :y: ~t' Y! `«J~j G v,I~ e, ' . i~ ' { ~ ~~~~i.i-~ " S~~.Y J~ ~:f;~`tr-:a-, }.<as .~4's~'`-'' '-t~- ;~.,f~'c a ` •~t.fi. ~ c~ ~'.J~~~~ ~•~:a • ;L'- ♦~1 ~ : l ' ~ ~ti ' ~i ?~-~~ie ~ - tiyS,t~'' _ ` = . ~ yi. , •k•• - - .~t> !tt~.i'`~'A-,•''L"~r aa.' ,e''~c _•s r~~.;1$~~ ~a: ~s Y?~.~1f A r„ r r•: ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~2 ~~y ' ~y' ~,:V ~b. ~ . si4 kw'~: ~ . - . :C~" ±tsw+==~f~ti.s'~:,`4.`~• i.i.~; +I'~ ~ 1.~ ~'c~J~ fl~:A~•~~ ~~--~?T ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT Z,'firf• Y'~''• - :M1 1' ' y~^ . . .;.`i,J ~if~~ t! `A' •'t~ ~ ~ ' ' / Ki, SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE "~FROM• CURRENT PLANNING SECTION 'i;'`';i:-'►.a~t: ' • -r . ' . ~4-~'~ DATE• SEPTEMBER 22, 1994 • ~YL.~1, SUBJECT: PE-1753=94, PRELIMINARY PLAT OF TURTLE CREEK WITH EXISTING URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) " WITH AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA (ASA) OVERLAY • . n„- . AND WITHIN THE PRIORITY SEWER SERVICE AREA (PSSA) ~ ~4tL 2!."~ . , -;~?ct w k~tY ' °+',r• I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Richard T. Dahm J~ c/o Dahm Development, Inc. Orange Flag Building, Suite 215 104 South Freya Street Spokane, WA 99202 (509) 535-5777 ~.~ys~•.` f{'~: Agent: Cathy Ramm ~ c% Ramm Associates, Inc. Lilac Flag Building) Suite 217 V 1 ;'t.k~ • -•L•j a.~+1. ~ ~ ~ ~ 104 South Freya Street ''~~''Z~~i• SPD~ane, WA 99202 (509) 534-8086 - - ~ + ~ ~~~•},~N:,y:t Surveyor: Patrick Moore : Inland Pacific Engineering 707 West Seventh Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 ~ ~~'e'` ~ (509) 458-6540 ~ Contact Planner• ~ . Thomas Veljic ~~'f , } , . . Y r ~ab I:'Ln ' Location. Generally located at the southwest corner of the Barker Road/Eighth Avenue intersection in the SE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. - Pro osat: p Preliminary plat to divide approximately 39.14 acres into 101 lots for single family dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban Residenrial-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone. . 9/94 HEC S taff Report for PE-1753-94 Page 61 ~ ~ • r ~ , . ~ A~~^~"~ ~'~^~i ~.t, • s•-,= ~ . • ' if.i`..,.c.• . s~;t~l~'c-.r"~L'•.Z.•.: ~ ~r~r.r•°.Jt.rpy„~...; 4, rho Ft• `'.LJ,~ ~v ~r~'1'' e':y,'~+:.}~fti•:'d d N,'.\5''• z7 r ,~y+ J, r, ; ~ , ~ i;~_ S - : ' :~f~:?~' • -;~uY, y kxi?{k, : ~ ~y`r' • • ai ~ , : ~-.1' ' .e~~ ` `~A~.Q. i~~{ ' t-~~✓.~d,p ° '}"~'7 ' , , ' A 1' ,s ,rf.. Gk . • ti ,,~s^:-.- .1k' $~.:;'-t'+.+i=: uy . 5~` r. ~ ♦ ~ ' y~' ~ • ' . -'r~'t' 7: J'-. J l ~A' `C r1 '•~''f, ~M1 '5;t;~ 5 Y ~;y. . J r ' tM ~ •'r. .S, . - . -:`r~Jj ;"r%, ,~c.•„ r ;t~t-.;k~•~,~`{pc'~~4. ' "'r ~ _ ::Y'`~~.''••:'2^~r... • ' ' -s l~t; : Q~:st:; •T~/•?C3 -'~i~ k6'~n y 1--.1 II. SITE INFORM ATION Yt`.'. '~''~`r~.' ~•••1''Z • f4~ ~i~~7 ei:-~'" :.'4•. A. Site Size: Approximately 39.14 acres Gross~Density: 2.58 units/acre-_ - =xr,.~ ~ ~t ' :4• n .it'' r t. V, - Q_ {./:•':'-'.M B Compr . _ ~ : B. ehensive Plan ' , r' A',, , ,e ~'i ~ 1. Land Use Plan: The property is located within the Urban Comprehensive. Plan category. The Urban category is intended to provide the opportuniry`'° - ~ for development of a city-like envuonment which includes variou`s land uses. Intensive residential, public facilities and public service, such as :~:z~_~.:~~ water, sanitary and storm sewer, police, and fire are, are typical of this', category. The residential density ranges from 1 unit per acre to 17 units per, acre. Objective l. la "Promotes fill-in within established development areas having ade~quate power supplies, water; sanitary sewers, streets . . . . The proposed plat confornis to the Urban Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives by providing fill-in development. The Comprehensive Plan defines "fill-in" as "Development that is located between, and in close proximiry to, at least two existing developed geographic areas have densities A7.tand land use which conform to the Comprehensive Plan map categories designated for those geographic areas. The result of this development J would aid in the economic support of public service systems by increasing the cost effectiveness of utilities and public facilities and ~services. When . -f reviewed within the context of Section 10.1, Water Quality, of the Comprehensive Plan fill in refers to development in those areas located within the Priority Sewer Service Area. "Fill-in" is a development most-. ` Y a'.aJ~ l i k e l y t o s u p p o rt c o n n e c ri o n t o p u b lic s e w e r t h e r e b y l i m i tin g n e w u n s e w e r development thereby protecting the Aquifer. . The overall gross density of 2.58 units per acre is within the lower •F~ ~w.+,': f''•~;~_~~,~ residential densiry range of the Urban Category guidelines. 2. Arterial Road Plan: The Spokane County Arterial Road Plan identifiesu;~- r Barker Road as a Principle Arterial with an existing width of 60 feet and a proposecl width of 100 feet. To implement qi~e, Plan the Spokane County En 'neer has recommended dedication of~'~eet of addi"tional right:Qf way a M~r~ ~ vLY ~ r and ~Kfeet of Future Acquisition Area along Barker Road. ' t° • Eighth Avenue and all internal roadways function as Local Access roads and:,~%,~ _ would be improved to existing roadway standards. Pedestrian facilities are~_ r e quired on Ei ghth Avenue due to the pro jects proximi ry to a public school: . • Off-site improvements are required as traffic mitigation. Phased . <,~,~:•;improvements include additional paving on Barker Road with turn lanes at.,: the ApplewayBarker intersecdon, paving of Long Road with pedestrian ; c;• K!: ~ r,,s circulation, and a traffic signal for the eastbound (south) ramps at the I-90 overpass on Barker Road. . • ¢`:-3~4~ 'N~A • 4 Pa e * 62;:=- 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 g, . . - ,v~~ - s ~-~ic, ' •,.'1 ~ , y~G?`'~'.~~'. { a • ~-~~w?~~' 'F:r ' , " . JjI .'r ~N_i..J.~'.`il'I.~•~~_~!~h.3. K .r'ea• 'j } r• 'C``;'..~'1~;:'t~..'~i:ira"s~r =r A' ..y~y ,K, t` • 7 Ac~. . ,~s.:,'`.a6'•. .~ti9♦ #~';M'''+ „ .it_t,-~~ ~ ~.g.~,~ l:Y:: _1" • 'i ~ '•k_~ `'.,v': ~}t tt~_'~z, ~:'••i ,y'. i=. f . • w y` r~; ~ ~g . p , - - . r` r f'~. ~YC':~i' ~ v '~''s'~'' ~''~ti'`C - . ` ) 'A ' 7qt?,' • "'M'" ' ,fW":~' - } 4 , 'tr • r v r' = y' r , i i. ' a ~ _ ; ' ~ ,y{)__~ 4 . 4'~r~-~ y,~ .i . -'ti.-~~•• Ir34 q ..F` X'-,~ • ~nt'y,~i 'y~t~, ~.s.r_ f ` • , '•u'~I''v'~5'r°f•_`;~~,e: 'J,;.+~• • - 3. County Parks Plan: The nearest County Park is Terrace View Park approximately two miles to the southwest. Terrace View Park is located at f~the northeast corner of the Blake/Twenty-fourth Avenue intersection and is ood Park. On si t e facilities include a sw y~ x;~- ~ c l a s s i fi e d a s a N e i gh b orh i m m. i n g poo l, so f t b a l l d iamon d, and p l a y are a. ~ . ~F. - Y~.. y~' • 14~ The Spokane County Parks plan identifies a deficiency of adequate Community Parks in the East Valley Metro Area and has recommended acquisidon of a park site in the Carlson Hill vicinity. The Department of Parks has requested the plat be conditioned for a voluntary agreement to mitigate impacts to Spokane County's Park System. ;<i" Z%x A{'.- C. Site Characteristics: The site is triangular shaped and bordered on the north 4;k: by Eighth Avenue, on the east by B arker Road, and on the south by Saltese `~-v{~~,a-~~~~f~ `Creek. Site area adjacent to the Saltese Creek drainage contain significant slopes ' whereas the remainder of the site slopes gently to the southeast. The site is 9N, x~.''+~ currently under agricultural production. ,r';r, ~ ` • , . . ' II. Neighborhood Characteristics: The surrounding area is on the fringe of a develoPng, area. Uses to the south are P~marilY a~cultural. Saltese Creek is i . n seasonal and runs from the southeast to the northwest., along the proposal's southern boundary, draining the Saltese Lake area. Greenacres Elementary ~School is located aPProxirnatelY 1/4 mile to the north on Fourth Avenue east of Long Road. t'. • , . . E. Zoning Analysis: Prior to the county-wide zone redesignation on January 1, r~ ~1991 surrounding areas were classified as Agricultural (A) under the, now exPired, SPokane CountY Zoning Ordinance in 1957 (ZE-286-57)• Urban ~Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zoning was implemented for the site and surrounding area consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. ~.~=1 • s: •Y Pro osal: Urban Residential-3.5 p (UR-3.5) esta.blished in 1991. , • ir . North: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991. _ aA L ' •'•r ~ } ~\r ~ •1 South: Urban Residential-3.5 (IJR-3.5) established in 1991. ':P?• C1'" East: Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991. . . West: IAN~Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1991. • ~5t .1 . M12;,~.~; :F. Land Use AnalysisBackground: The general area is located in a transitional urban area. Prelimin plats of Pheasant Park (PE-1740-93) and Meadovwiew q~Ranch Estates (PE-1644-91) have been approve to the north and east respectively. Pheasant Park, located west of Barker Road and north of Eight Avenue, consists of nine one acre lots for single family residenrial uses: Meadovwiew Ranch ~ . Estates, located east of Barker Road and south of Eighth Avenue, consists of 35 single family residential lots with an overall density of 2.5 units per acre. The first 141ot phase of Meadowview Ranch Estates has been finalized and recorded. Agricultural uses are present to the south and west of the site. Remaining lots to . ,i . the north vary in size from 1 to 5 acres and contain residential uses. rZ y. ~~t . . _ 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 Page 63 • raj~r~^~'+=- • . , .a.:" . .~i; ' 'i~~1••tT`\~~.,T~ :1 ~ "C:'~' t''; . ' _ ' --r ~ ' a- m•-,<~ ~:•-c: ^•r.~'3 +::T-.,_°;~... ~.~i i_,,,,,.+.,:., . ~ . 't': r i ~f d f ^ t ~.''T% ~y ' ~0 '+'~'~b t,, ~i~ '-y • „th, i%:c_s ylS . r;v•,: . . ~%,r'~'~.~° -•;~~%~.•e:~.~' Sf-: , ' ' ~ :f '4~•. ?t%~.% r~'f ; ',~t: ,Y {-',:~7~. i4 ' ` ~~I~ ,iG+ it5'~ . j . r \T~~ '~r',~`~`,, , , , 2 S; M . ~ • .r„.{"~;~yj . . 1 _ 1C' .\~••1. t•y t'~ ~ ~ ~'1 _ ' • ~•*f! ' r~f~Y~ 2~'' i•y`v '4 - ' ~i' ~`:~w.T 'd 54~~,~ r.. `~Jl~ 1`~ • j'f:._ ..q.. TJC:,,_ t.. fi . - ' .j-'t`l,x.~~J•~~-,.~?a . ~ • •~~~~4a~ . , y :,~j ~"a?r {R • ; • • ~ • , ` F~i Hitchcock First Addition, PE-1651-92, 'consisting n 8.82" of 29 residential lots'o ~ ` ' ' acres (3.2 residential units per acre) was ultimately denied by the Board=of ~Coun Commissi ty oners due to lac k o f u b lic sewer. T he p Hitchcock site was.-*„:~ located north of th e Turtle Creek proposal, adjacent to F ourth Avenue :tF~~. . ~~,K `4~ C~: C..i1'~~•'~y' I, k i .i • -r Site: Agricultural production. • . - . ~ North. . Single Family Residential •f'~u'''J '''~~~f~"~ra~,`^. South: Agricultural '`~~.',~~:;f~ ~~J`r?• - ~h"• '.dt,~ East Single Family R esidential ft._ 69, ~!r • - 1 ~ ~~'3z-g West: Undeveloped, Single Family Residential, and Agricultural productiori~"~l~ G. Circulation: Two access points to the existing County road system are ,_~:3 .e;~ • proposed along Eighth. Avenue. Internal roads are a combination of public and private roadways. The proposed, network of private roadways is inconsistent with County roadway standards and will need modification., Preliminary plat~' approval has been conditioned for administrative review/red,esign to comply with roadway standards. . ~I . Design: 'The prelinunary plat consists of 101 single family residential lots in three phases. Plan design appears to be a hybrid of a standard subdivision with elements of a Planned Unit Development. although a specif'ic "PUD" applicarion w~_ has not been submitted. Significant axnounts of open space have been proposed along the Saltese Creek frontage and Barker Road with maintenance prov'ided by p2 ,rl~.r,. . r a Homeowners Association. Lf ~ . . , .•~';t i Lots located in Phase Three, along the Saltese Creek drainage, contain significant slope. Primary access to Block Three, and the easterly portions of Block Two are:~~-;`,~: - % r : •a within the network of private roadways. Lots 12-15 of Block 2 have frontage on,._. . ~ both public and private roads. The Spokane Counry Subdivision Qrdinance Section N.B.(5) specifically discourages double frontage lots except in cases o 'k'f`h significant topography. Elimination of the network of private roads discussed above may alter plat design in this area. `r L~y "~4~ ~ Building setbacks in the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone are 25 feet for front and flanking streets,, S feet per story for side yards, and 20 feet for rear yards. No variance from the underlying dimensional standards have been applied 1t. . v . for. Lots located along Barker Road will have a 16 foot future acquisition area and the preliminary pTat approval, has been conditioned for measurement of setbacks from the edge of the Future Acquisition Area. The Arterial Road Plan does recommend a setback of 35 feet from all arterials and the Hearing Examiner::, Committee has the option of implementing the 35 foot setback for those lots which front Barker Road. The Planning Department recommends a 35 foot structure setback from the Future Acquisirion Area on Barker Road. ~ ~ = 1,~ I. Density: The proposed gross density is 2.6 dwelling units per acre. All lots must meet the minimum 10,000 square foot lot size requirement of the Urban ter •C• ` Residential-3.5 (L1R-3.5) zone. . ' . . • " y h, . 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 pagesr,64~~~:;:; ; ~j 5;s.r•.. - , • ' ~ i ; i 4•' ;;^i1~~`~:~=; i ~ ` ' -~~;`-f.pi" ' s'' ~ . l~. ,,w 'r • . t '`_l, ~ ~:E.; . ='~+c,,:ta.. rsro.r :2~ -fe•~~; ~^'.',~7r+~t~~'~'yry-. s',: n•'.~ `7i . . .~.t : - • t . 'w i Tq•,•iw. Y`• ,a ' ~ : : L~j•r... ~ ' • ~ e • '7~ Jf ~a•` Ir J ' j.~F.A,~ j.i~" ' 1. ' j~~~ w~ ~~`~T, . P r•' ~r t• r'7 c3 ` j.. Y .}~d~',+.k ~ , '.14t` ~7~ ~ 34' ' , ~ . ~ . . }j ~j-`• ' ~ ri~ . w ' ~'.5+_ trr1 t~ t'rj'H , cl:: , ' ',c 'rp, ^ . , nt ' t , . ' t* - w ;,a ' . - . .yi+ ,~t'-a'~w•. . ~•i- 1'qf• yL,.: F_ , ~r. 1c9•^.t} al ;TI`i . f,~y {ra ,,.yr,t~'`~• - ~.'a d - i` Y ~t. u ~ • , `.9 ti' ` . -''t^ HI.. j' • ~ . . 2 ~ ! , A Q . • , rf ( Drainage: A drainage plan is required This plan must be reviewed and roved b the Coun En 'neer's Department prior to development. a PP Y tY ~ i ~•5"j ~,tM ~~.b. ~ ~JJ•••,`. ~`'j~~. 4±~'T., i• .S~~S :4,~~ K. Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements: None have been identified. •M'" t1.~-~'j . .J~J ~1~• _ . r ' , LL;''~' L. Water Supply: The proposal is within the Consolidated Irrigation District. No . • comments have been receiveri from the District A water Plan will be requued prior to finalization of this plat. M. Sewage Disposal: Connection to public sewer has been proposed by the applicant. The Spokane County Utiliries Departrnent has conditioned plat approval for public sewer connection based on the applicants proposal. The nearest connecting point would be at the Long/Appleway intersection with the r't~.;~: ; , . . main sewer located adjacent to Appleway within the abandoned Milwaukee Road ,~Z • x'Y,.~ _ right of way. ~ .~1r;'•KI_ . N. School: The proposal is in the Central Valley School District No. 356. The ~~~~•-"District has commented on the proposed preliminary plat and has requested that • plat approval be conditioned on a voluntary agreement between the developer and . X~; y . • . . School District to mitigate impacts of overcrowding on the District. Conditions for a voluntary agreement have been attached to the recommended conditions of approval. O. Fire Protection: The proposal is within Fire District No. 1. The Fire District - and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to finalizing the preliminary plat. , `P. Wetlands/Critical Areas/Resource Lands: The Department of Ecology (DOE) has responded to the proposed open space corridor to protect the wetland area associated with Saltese Creek. The DOE recommendations have been incorporated in the preliminary plat conditions of approval and include re- ~ vegetation, a conservation easement, and boundary line delineation to prevent encroachment by adjacent lots. :,;~';r;u:.;`'~- ~u~'~°`' _ Q. Cultural Resources: None have been identified. : . : • 4y~ ~ ' R. Air Quality Conformity: A traffic analysis was prepared and subm.itted by the applicant. Impacts to County and State transportation systems were evaluated and mitigated by the applicant.. The Spokane County Planning Department finds the proposed preliminary will meet Air Quality Confornuty of the Washington and Federal Clean Air Act. . t. I_r, S. Transit: The site is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) •=y, . but is not directly served by public transit. Carpooling or use of park and ride lots would be available to potential residents. ~ ..~s: T. Spokane County Parks, Recreation and Fair: The Spokane County P:. Parks and Recreation Plan indicates that existing park facilities in the Spokane Valley are inadequate to meet current and projected needs. The Parks Department has requested the applicant be required to reach a voluntary agreement to mitigate the impact of the proposal on the school district. To sarisfy the requirements of RCW 58.17.110 that a subdivision make appropriate provisions for public parks, .9/94 HEC S taff Report for PE-1753-94 65 Page e . ~k~ (i~yr~h,' • . . •s"'i,~.,~~ky`'~;`3 ~ ~~•.i 1 ;~Ny~~~Ti/,Y t~ • YI . \s ~r. .1 r`'Zy , r~..'.,'r''g.jj'" F' .t}+ ~•4~/°y~ p: : i , v,^ . • ~ tyn ;•a,• v r" V__ 't' : ' t~;,yf ~]`e c , f yc• t ~.r`n SG`7 , ' •1,' : .t ,!P y • rl . Caa~ _ . - ~ , ` Q' ' y . / ~S ' ~.f : "~Y ~`j~, . f i L • ~ r {ti.-~ 1 : < _ " .w', :y~: ic ~~Ci `w' i..' : - i,'Y'¢'i ti ~ 1; f' i~~• .ic ~ i' ` . . , 1 ~ i k, h• , ji[ R"~. _;!t'~q' r .:;c1eDr.~i i•'1~ i ' as w ' :';t'~I. R~Y~ ';i.., µ•''r`z1W~-i`•:~y';'''~; y' t~ . 't .t tr . .4}' ..y.t .,r': ♦ ~T,.~ ~ ~ ~Iri ~ . ' 'M • ,~+..C~1~`~'i~ recreation and playgrounds, the owner, ut his option, shall either dedicate land. '•~~Fy~'r~ within the subdivision or enter into a voluri °n: tary agreement with Spokane County :y,, to mitigate the direct imPacts that the subd.ivision has on ublic arks, o en ~ , 7 1 spaces and recreational facilities within the unincorporated areas of Spok ne~ County. This request is includ ~ ed as a recommended condition of approval:;~LIf die owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be execufed prior to the finalizarion and recording of the plat and recorded in conjunction. =~o., t'rtherewith. The agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 and ' • • substantially the same as the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane~~ County Parks, Recreation and Fair D ~~~~a• epartment. Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise an urchaser of rope y p p rty, as authorized under RCW„,, 58.17.205, of the obligation within the voluntary agreemerit. . • ~ •ti"':.r, .'A • :ti fi~l x. ~ ~ III. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: . x An Environniental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by . g the County Planning Department. 'The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and> laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive ' ~"i Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Planning Department, has determined that there are probable significant adverse impacts if the proposal were develo ed as ro osed. However, the a licant has a eed to s ecific mitiatin P P P PP P g g,r measures which should minimize or eliminate the probable significant adverse .~;,.:LL impacts. Therefore a Mirigated Detennination of NonsiLnifcance ("NIDNS") has been issued. The specific mitigating measures include: . • r~ fi PhaSe 1 r' 1. Pave Long Road from Eighth Avenue north to the existing pavement. 2. Provide a hard surface pedestrian wallcway on the east side of Long Road with~~ 1 • ~the new pavement, . , . Phase II . ' a~ . 3. Install a new traffic signal at Barker Road and the Eastbound (south) I-90 ramps. The applicant/owners shall be responsible for design, funding, and .;.~construction of the traffic signal along with improvements associated with the traffic signal. The traffic signal and improvements shall meet WSDOT standards. 4. Commit to 10% of the cost to upgrade the traffic signal at Barker Road and Appleway. The amount to be placed in an escrow account for future upgrades to the signal at this intersection. Phase III , . . a • t,~ 5. Widen Barker Road 'to 30 feet with a two (2) foot shoulder on one side of , .,Barker Road. ir • ~r,~ S . . _ 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 Page ~,66.~; • ' r ;4^~ 'r, i! 1S' ~ • , . ,l'yy4 j~;~~ r~i~+ • ` '•~^St'~ - j,T~1~~ '4~~~, L~:{_ ~xLi.1 ~..YY91 tr'...t f• • -~••?Li~.''l(i • ~f ' 1.iij • ' V '~p..9'.:f;J• i'rihT ~`r' • ' • e ~i~ :~~,Jt 'r,~ c.Es~r. . 3. A • a • j„ ~ _c: ,h ir'~ i•Y<~ • • -s,Stil<r`•~'• ~ {'t,'~{~ Yv.!` L l t ' ~ • • r± ls / t a~F~ 4I q- W, 7G l w. , k.:. i`7: . 'f~~ ' j...~ .c• , ~A+~~'~~~•~= f4ti ' I' ~~~aYt.t~l' ~y 1 Mv.t-d. ~ ; . ; . ~ • ~ •r. : • , - - . . ~ _y f~.,~'j*~ ? -~y^,~"~a:i y - • ~t-: s ♦ :,k; ,a~-,q~e~,. o. - • ° •'t,`=r~' • •i`y4ti~i;aT~ r 'fR:.4 s~yt• iTv`~~'3.~i."~ ' : . . : i ~~„~L ~ u ~ '.4. - _ ~ _ . , }The "NIDNS" was circulated to 13 other agencies of jurisdiction and other P agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "MDNS" comment period ends September 20, 1994 and was advertised 15 =y~M-':~;~ V ~ y'' ^•calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property w •i'~•rS '•Stt i~~ Lr `,13 r' Y ' ..t ,;~fY ; owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearing. `}a~~~ ' ° rJ.f • ' :i . IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION y 1 F; _ ..C, t . ~ ''y~'t` ;4. c,• ° , The proposed preliminary plat is located within the Urban Category and the proposal is . , consistent with, and implements the Goals of the Spokane Counry Comprehensive Plan. The sponsor is required to provide significant mitigation for traffic impacts to the County and State roadway system which improves levels of service to acceptable : , Ar F r Jl levels. Significant mitigation for on site restoration of native vegetation has also been ' ~ • • •.1 required along Saltese Creek. Other public services such as water, sewer, and schools will be provided for. The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat as conditioned for provision of infrastructure and mitigation of impacts ~'y , ' , „'f, consistent with RCW 58.17.110. The Heanng Examiner Committee should consider the timing of this P roPosal in relationshiP to the availabilitY of sewer service. V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL -`i. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall ~ be binding on the "Applicant", which terms shalt include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. ~ i i: The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record,. " - ' .e~';;. . ~ 'ti'•' rc .~°r _ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~.i~Ric:~r•t•~ r ~ `f i• t : ~ :F: The ro osal shall com 1 with the Urban Residential-3.5 P P p y (LTR-3.5) and Aquifer x-Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zones, as amended. The preliminary plat shall be r~ W,-' ° redesigned to comply with County Roadway Standards. Approval of this redesign shall be administrative. ; ~ . . 2. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a _ . o;b°= r•'_7 °y change of condition application submittal and approval. ;.~f_ 3. The Planning Directo'r/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these Findings and Conditions of Approval. ?a',i ?;6 4. A final plat name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee. ~ 5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated. . F~•~, '`9%94 HEC S t , aff Report for PE-1753_94 . Page 67 ~ 't. ~F_ ~ s:. - ~~4 ' ,e.t•.. • . . ~~y- ^ '',c~~~+.},~ ro r . r~ Y-„~; t •-,j: yt~' _ti"~ab;^). - ..75"-"S. p*,.~.. r i~ 7„{ U` 4 , ~ .q ft ; ` • ` ' :i" :'.f ~r~ A =it{~ ' ~ • ~i Y ~ f J k n,ll~ai,~,.+a~ ~t~~~ ,.,~a r • ~ , Y-". 'Y'IE.'sc. J i' ' ~Kk. Y ,j~ ~o ~ v, ' . - ~ ' yY . :f` ' fi• a+~: Zi ¢ r~ '.'`,.y~'' ~al`t~.;-:/,,.,'y~,ps• ~ .Q ,R e`f L:y`~ il - . . I~ _ . ✓ ~i:. .,ti n j l) t ' ,'1 •Y.•° . . A~~')~`l~'.f' ~.11 fti~~~~?{+ ~ ~t' , j' . •v' e St' ~ r' • ' y~ . .1.~ L~_ ;~i.~t , ~ . 'i L;i" . ~Z j, . ' ry . ~ ~,~.~r r •'w'~ ~brsr~3j ' x 4ti=li.a ~ 6. The Preliminaz`Y Plat is ~ven conditional aPProval for three (3) Years, sPecifical-TY, to. ~ October 1, 1997. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a~fi written request approximate1y forty-five (45) days prior to the a jbove expiration s;;r;~:.~; 4! i<-j date. :F4•~ 1~, .b~'..S~.y•~`~,• """4F t ~ 7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval of utiliry easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final plat. 4~4"~~ 8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedicarion shall contain the •i;~1~4~; following statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at thq,;~r. time building pernuts are requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted 'on this final plat. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper a t" ~ zoning approvals are obtained.'' NOTE: Building setbacks along Barker 411 Road shall be 35 feet and are measured from the edge of the Future Acquisition Area. . , , F•i''3 9. Three (3) current certificates of tide shall be furnished to the Planning Department. prior to filing the final plat. . 10. Prior to filing of all or a pornon of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall ..A submit one or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shal.l • ; ; match the appropriate assessor's map scale. - 11. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for any lot(s) located on a temporary cul de sac or stub road: "Lot(s) { B loc k(s) [ ] are locat e d on a temporary cul-de-sac. This temporary cul-de-sac may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circularion needs dictate." 12. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or exceed the minimum frontage of the under lying zone o f t he fina l p lat. . , _ „ • ~i::w 13. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be~= s approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County " Building & Safety Department and County Hea1th District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan, prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs and regulations. The Water Plan and certificadon shall be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproducrion and be Jyr.41 0' signed by the plat sponsor. ' ` ' n 14. 'I'he water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of • '~'l, L':6the water system in accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits wnthin the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane Counry and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit s~ due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satis factorily comp le t e t h e a p p r o v e d ~ water system. 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 _ Page .68a` .5%~t~ . - ,y ~'i 't'~~' . • • ~ ~ _ A nt,-S, C st ~ FM~xX •..iy~.F;F~~~ ~ .C.y~' `•ji~*~:~~` ~1 ~ Y ^ . •J..~~ t '..'1?'_:~ ,.~t'`"~.i cM: . • ,-l;"r ; i .~...F~tr^ty~Me as (ry,cs •i • • . - . ' ' 1 • ~w' r ♦ ~`!''i;"•y '`f'~,:Y~ L )Y e?-i'r {J ~ 7 A . t ''"'t y~s n, r'.~ '~Tj aiy`. i~ t.-+~:':, - ' rJ." `h: . . ° . ~ ,y F a ♦ -5:' j ~ %'`~~'~'@, a~~' ~ dy ) 5 ~A,7}{ •r~l .v. . . ' • ~ ~r j `~j`'1`;, t ; ^t+ !r~i ?~`-i - 'a'i ' Iit:~: > ^ F~.• ~ , ~ . ~ ~:"_~fS.' ~ ' ' ii.,f ` b• , •'6 . .~p i~~. il ~~a.. 4r u~ f u. ~ r ~ ~,J` • J' T i` •i.. '.,~""bs,h'Y -~~J~'- .d 'S:.~C. ' f~y.~~ , F ; :.t • 1 ~i -i . ,;-?';4~y . , , ..$..s"Ti-'': • , <<. ',i ~ s ''i: Y~~ 1 a ~ • ~ 4,. ~ . ~'-::~-xr•~. 1 S.*- The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual airangements and schedule of irnprovements.have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of ~ , . r : ~8;.`.k; • ; ; t the water s ystem in accordance with the a p proveti Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for complerion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate L!J M~'S'ti i YJ. • , j • . .TS~ ; h • M fy., < :--health authorities prior to application for building permits within the final plat. The •wGi . i~ Xt,•~.•' arrangements or agreements shall include a provision holding Spokane County and ."'f',• the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. ~v. f!~- • ~ + 16. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a Washington state-licensed engineer that the water system has been installed " `pursuant to the approved. Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stam . The certification ma be in the form of a letter, but is referred to be certifed on a copy of the Water Plan as a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system. Y 17. The Water Plan and the above four (4) condirions of approval regarding the Water Plan may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from t h e a p p r o p ria t e w a t e r p u r v e y o r and fir e p r o t e c tio n d i s t r i c t s t a t i n g t h a t s i m p l e • • ~'~f~ :Y connections to an existing, approv e d water system wi ll provi de a dequate domestic and fire protection water to ensure the public health, safety and general welfare. , ~~i ~ o'•c ~ 1• 8. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat. ~ 19. The dedicatory language of the plat shall contain the following language, "The private roads and common areas cannot be sold or transferred, regardless of any Y~. • y~ provision in the covenants to the contrary, and shall be considered subservient ~ estates for tax purposes to the other lots created herein." 20. A copy of the homeowners/property owners' association articles of incorporation and/or bylaws and/or covenants and restrictions, together with any other provisions . , .r - `~=k=•. for maintenance of common areas and facilities, shall be submitted for review and approval to the Planning Department prior to finalizing. - ~ .'.s . 21. Prior to any approval of road and drainage plans, you are required to coordinate with the United States Postal Serv'ice to d'eternune type and location of central mail delivery facilities which may include applicable easements for developments of three or more homes. . ,v ~ • ' •.A ' 22. The Owner shall negotiate with the Central Valley School District and submit a recorded copy of a voluntary agreement making'provisions for public schools prior to finalization and recording of this plat. The agreement shall provide a written ~5:• description of the su6ject property to which the agreement applies and also state the ^fdollar amount and any other agreed to mitigating measures. The Owner shall also notify any potential purchasers who have made an agreement to purchase property within said plat pursuant to tlie Revised Code of Washington t`'i.':•;,a-. (58.17.205), that adequate provisions for school facilities must be made conditioned on a future agreement between the plattor and school district. ~Voluntary agreements between the Owner and School District shall confonn to the requirements of the Revised Caie of Washington Chapter 82.02. 94 HEC Staff Report for PE-17-53-94 Page 69 ' r~'~,y_1 S ty ' a~'} • • 1' S~p."a i•1S'~ ' µE ~e~~,~ >~...l:~r~i.~:'[~?•~ i:i~~_:t~~.~,t~, • ~ • . yT ~ . `T ri ~ ~+;r' ~,'~;,•~_".•~~~i~+Sr,*'°`x,,= v~'.. y~;rtx':T~:~y'('~;r r''',+',"°.e ~.c~,y+ ~ , i;~~~. ::4-_~ .v ~ ~r~i:}".~u'`- ~k~ ~ ;~s, .~j^r,.;,~~~s~ ,•;~1 . , ' 1~ ~ ~ ' I i' ~aN~ ~ ~:`~j :8.. ~;i t.i • ~t= 'i'~~ ~i,jj~„~'~~~-~ . i:i~' i~.i- 4~..:~'~,J~h~",,~ . -,.tat°:~ . ~4 ~+i' ~ s r~•,,,~ . ~ ~ i: ;n.~`y~ :ti_:,`'~ - ~~yf~.•' i.i' - : - ~t^r~' ~ Y[; - ~:!~i' : , ' Si ~~j ' t a E.., • _ 1. ~~1 ~ : ' f :y: r , . xJ, s,g ~•t . x ~•n ~S;' 4rwfY,:.~~¢ "~'~i:,~A ~S • .i~fv-p~ :~ilS ` ~ ~e i~~:?+~. :F +t, . ` ' ~u'~ _:.~'t RztY, ^,~'r ~ ~.r' ~c_ ~ • ~ ~ t•- ~r,~ ~,k:~ r ~~ti, 5.:~~i.~r'Q ":v~~r'' ~ f'fi 41ti 'a' ~i~ . ~ ' t F. ,~~g`~'~ 'y~'~'a~,•;~d~L y~~ • - • ~ . ~ °~~ip. ~..:el 't ,'4- , •d s,~•' ~ . P - . ~l`r' ~ ~ 1- J ~4 •.r 23. To satisfy the requirements of RCW 58.17.110 that a subdivision make appropriate ~ ~ .~':~,:z~ provisions for public parks, recreation and playgrounds, the owner, at his oprion, sti~~"all a s.~,~~#;. either dedicate land within the subdivision or enter into a voluntary agreement with °;f,. { _ ` ~ ~ Spokane County to mitigate the direct impacts that the subdivision has on public parks, :~_;~i~.. ~;-0, .,~~c open spaces and recreational facilities within the uni.ncorporated~ areas of Spokane ~ a=~ ~ County. _/j~ =r K i.r~.Ct , , y, f'~ r . . ' •S:': ' , If the owner opts to enter into a voluntary agreement, the agreement shall be executed prior to the finalization and recordi.ng of the plat and recorded in conjunction therewith.,~,?. The agreement shall be consistent with RCW 82.02.020 and substantially the same as x.~:-- .~~ti the standardized agreement prepared by the Spokane County Parks, Recrearion a~d Fair ~i~ Departmen~ Prior to finalization of the plat, the owner shall advise any purchase"r~of ~,,r; ~;;:~,as property, as authorized under RCW 58.17.205, of the obligation witfiin the vol ~ntary~~~ „~~~~Y ~ ^ ~:Y ~ r~ agreement. ~ ' , ,~1 1~'~;~ ; 24. The final plat{s) shall be addressed in accordance with RCW 58.17.280 and local ~a; `,~a. ordinance. ~ . . . ~ ~ , t, 25. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the 1~ C?'~s. , . .~n County Auditor a Tide Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road t'~~ ~ ~ Y right-of-way and utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:~ ~ . -~.a , .,,f: . a. At least 6 eet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and~ ~ ~ , _ utilities, in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way alorig , F~ Barker Road. NOTE: The County Engineer has required,.4~'feet of new { dedicarion. ~ ~ _ . U' ' • ~ ~ ' ~Y i b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County, Zoning y;F; Code shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area. ~;"f~~~~.~1~, J~ . ~ ' ~ . . . . ~ ; . ~~x: c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs ~"i ax; ~-a^ should be located within the future acquisition area for road nght-of-way andr.. .-~y. ' .y: : : : uti lities. I f any o f t he a b ove improvemen ts are ma de wi t h i n t h i s a rea, the y shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are z~w''" ~V:~: iV, made. ~ ~;t i ~ d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may ~p ~ be used as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as • landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or ot hers) s h a l l be considered interim uses. , ~ ~ . . ~.4 ` _ .'`f=`-. e. The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim" ~~Y°~ improvements at the tirne Spokane County makes roadway improvements ~ ~ ~ ~y~ after acquiring 'said future acquisition area. ~~t~ ~ . • . s~ << 26. The owner/applicant shall prepare a"narive" landscape plan, for those areas ~ . adjacent to Saltese Creek, and submit the plan to the Department of Ecology (DOE) -~~-~`=4~~ : _ t...- for review and approval prior to finalization of any phase of the preliminary plat of ~ 1 record. The landscape plan shall include the proposed "fencing" discussed in the t~ memo from DOE dated July 27, 1994. The applicant shall also prepare a"Native . : . ~ • `~`~."'i M _ a ' z- 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 Page.~70; ~ ~ K~j'~ : ++'-`=A ; ' . .A ,.r'~.,bf,,~~, ~o . a, ~ i y'1, ~ F•Y.,~ 'Yia::~ • • ~ , ~''1Ml~„~`i'!'ly~"71,~ ~Y< ~ . - . ~ ~ ~ i' ' i r~s`~~1~~"'1 'It •1 i ~ :!\a: ~1'~ , .f~ c .j ..11~ ;f`: . ~ ' • 9''~ _.Ef1Z'.. C._ L"'~ .~i.~ ri;~` ~,`j nr;v x ~.z .:t;f-•tr4°.~;•3,:+fY 7 . ~ t • a , :L' ; . t~~r~,f•,• ' -k~- _4' t L~. r;• r^ y~ ~S .a^~..~. r , ,~ti:,S• ti . ; q- _ j: (y, ,J•:~Z r'"~,?_ V7~Si .4 . Fii' ♦i. P ,2.>• . t• ''I' f';.~`;y f ~•1 .1 _ r' r a Y:~ ~ r! J'4;l ' ~ j3 ' +.i~° . 1~ .i~v: ~4'~I ~ ':I r. ~ ' . . i~ • ~ ~ 1 .vyy .4 , _ .y, 4: i ''d Jv.. . ~bf%-•-~... 4 tid , . .J~ 4' ~t` i 3: t te l3 ~ ~..,ti~ ry~` h 0 ; ~r <j'' • 'r 4;~; 1 ti . ~1..Y'j: • yJ.s.. ile',. .;.i.' b•I.~.i?~:.- ar~? ` ♦ 2ry i!S .:~ij.+v , i-.'. E±s ! , i ' ~ t• r++ ' `-Ei+-, J5 Growth Protecrion Easement" for approval by DOE. The easement shall be ~ disclosed on all Phases of the final plat and shall read to the effect: l'~s: r•Yr • }5t . • j-'` ~.t.: i(; ^:rt. . ~~.J"This subd.ivision is under the terms of a Narive Growth Protecrion Easement" for . ~ s~ 4r p~- Pf`, those open space areas adjacent to Saltese Creek. Maintenance and protection of -this open space is the responsibiliry of the Homeowners Association. t,;►: , ~ - . Encroachmerit into the Easement by adjacent lots is strictly prohibited." ~5R p,`~~ ` A 4 _ j Z~. ; 3_~• , - _ t7~. o;.•,' • . y~•'. ~ JSPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS .;~,r iP'-R "Prior To Issuance Of A Building Pernut Or Use Of The Pronertv As ProDOSed: ^+~ft ~":t , ~h~'. , . • . 1 The condiuonal approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. - x,•:• 2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the Counry ~f~z Engineer for approval prior to construcrion and/or the filing of each final plat; road . . plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. ~ :r',. 3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities ,,~.;t. shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final p1aG Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a .7p licensed Professional Civil Engineer. ' ~k F; E'• ' ` 4. T'he regOlations of the National Fload Insurance Program shall be observed. A developintnt permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or develo ment begins within any area of special flood hazard (reference Spokane n j;~• "j• •~1• COUIlty <Jldinance No. 81-0726). . ;F. ' h ' , ~i. ~,•~My, , . „`,.t. The following statement shall appear within the dedicatory language of the plat: "DeveloPment within this subdivision shall conform to the r ^ ~•,~equirements of the . r, ~ • National Flood Insurance Program and the Spokane County Flood Zone Ordinance. ° : . • Purchasers of the properry within this subdivision are warned of possible flooding 'rf or ponding and the potential requirement to purchase flood insurance. This , warning shall be carried in each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property within the plat in the area of special flood hazard. This condition is applicable to driveway approaches, driveways and private roads constructed on the site for access." ' > c,,iPp -t ti,y 5 . Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor;'who shall furnish the County Engineer with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all ' improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construcnon plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 6. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. tVy~, . ' ` J " • , ' 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 Page 71 ~r"- ~ • 4.yr ~:.rt . t" • 'r t~,~/ FF , • . i . 'r. ~ . , t r : ~ `.i; ~~.~fbYl-G._.;:f. %.Ln'b13tfi~ :C±' ~ , r. - °t t"'g,.i' ,~~.•la~;`i M`..'` f '"'d, °r i.+ ,i.: f.•';, + i~d• -.r 7_-! ,-r- ~`t:~-, ~ rraF~ i 1 • T r e eY ~ ~A . •i U' t p:. _ ~.e • + Z ;.~r.'~ •r ~ :f.. ,1 ,r.r `"6- ~r'~,ty ~4tR ^!h .}1 '4_ ,'1) ~ ~ .~'Oi 2s N.wt !f' } • _ • /'Of.'• • ' i... ✓ pC,r.Y~ r :Z~ ~ ~:^';~~ti - :l. . • ~y.f ! .cr i•i:~., f,~`~ w ;,A t~ ~ • ' , '~^a .a F, c3,~" - ' F , ' ,.,:i ~F`• i 4 . •;o.. kR{iti~4.~ti .i .cJ. ,4 , • a:~' t t ~ p' . ;k.at' . • ' 1 • i;' ?t r 1-ti;f , » ,"~,'•'L7 ~ J1 ~ y. : i t ¢!,-;•i r 7. All construcrion within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be ~f.•Y completed prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amoun t estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of const-uction of improvements, construction :a~ certification, "as-built" plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed 4v~=: with the County Engineer. f- , .~~s-. , , , - ~ ~ • .'~a; 8. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following-described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: a one (1)-foot strip at the ends oF edges of all streets that tenminate or border the subdivision : boundary. (Temporary cul-de-sacs are required when streets terminate at the ~:~t. :~-;..•r' subdivision boundaries.) . ~ 9. Individual driveway access pennits are required prior to issuance of a building y ~ permit for driveway approaches to the county road system. :i13t ~Y t 10. Dedicarion of 2 feet of addirional right-of-way along Barker Road is required. hi :S~4xj•. ~ ~~(1: . 11. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Barker Road. ' . . ' ' • :1,-ai: . ' 12. A statement shall be placed in the plat dedication providing for future slo$e k ~ 'i , ' easements as required by.Spokane County along Barker Road. ~ p { 13. Existing county roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to Spokane County standards. . , 14. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards. ' 15. Sidewallcs are required along the arterial(s) on Barker Road- 16. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, 4*;,' .~s assigns and successors. .l'•. 17. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the ~ approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution w hic h purpose is t he formation o f a Roa d I mprovemen t Dis t ric t ( R ID) for said improvements, pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such time as an. RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the im rovements r uired (curb, sidewalk, dra.inage control and Paving to existin P ~ g'~. pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns. This provision is applicable to Barker Road south of Eighth pK:•;; Avenue. ~ . . 18. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road ~ ~,07: `>.i ' improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvements. At such time as an RID is ~-~f--• ` •y•- i •~'1 created or any Road Improvement Project is sancrioned by Spokane County, the imProvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner(s), their heirs, . . ~ .,i. , grantees and assigns. This provision is applicable to Bar.ker Road south of Eighth Avenue. Page,~,72d_ 9/94 HEC Staff RePort for PE-1753_94 ,;~;u,t'`~,d.s~ • , r W,My`'° . „y 7, :~cnj~ ~ S ~y:.• ~ ~,~~•w;'~: a ti"f:, ~ Yti.y.-' s`a'`i~ * } ' -..i;'' t riy, ,,.•>i: r-1j, '5~,, Lbr9;' 'sFt •'~a- 'r `t .'t'~ kS ~sk4~s~ ~,~~i~ • .-L r. Fj `r • ' a ~ _ {@ ~ 'F~, Vyr<d . h~ y v~ ~r 'y% ' •q • , , ' •t . fi y r , j`'-v~ 4+ A 1 ~ C- ' . 1 u~~1 k~ L. • •1 !t Y ri} it F St ~'~1`~ r% ~ u, ~ 't ~ ~ ~'~a~, GY i-"~ iS1` b - 34 " ~ .s•,~~ . . t ' ' 19. The following sta.tement shal.l be placed in the plat dedication: ~=G=x~ : ~ ~ - • ; ~ fr' < Qnri. x'~' r~ l••~y ' "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) ii=~; . . . • ' . w - by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petirion includes the owner(s)' property, and furcher not to object, by the signing of a ballot, to the =.the resolution method Pursuant to ChaPter 36.88 RCW, formation. of an RID by which resolurion includes the owner(s)' property. If an RID is formed by either the rt• h • : ~s. petition or resolution method as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: ~ - k '.~a' ~ '°C r1~1~.3~ ~(a) that the improvement(s) or construction contemplated within the proposed ~ a,.G'~~; w„ > RID is feasible; . . rifrm he formation of the RID b.the ro ertx>s (b) that the bene~ ts to be de ved o t y p p y ~ ::c~tat v ri t . included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceed the cost and ex p ense of formation of the RID; and (c) that the ProPem' within the ProPosed RID is sufficiently developed. ~ •!"e~T y; •~..~v ~1~.'~:. Pr`o vided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as x:.' i~ - authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property . as a result of the improvements called for in conjuncrion with the fonnation of an RID by either petition or resolurion method under Chapter 36.88 RCW, and to , - - Mlrmlng e~al to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners the final assessment roll. A, . It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement ctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, Project is, idev ~~ra~l~~~ ~ ~age control and Paving) will be at the sole exPense of the s ;r. . undersigned owner(s), their heirs, grantees and assigns without participation by . r ,•r. A` Spokane County. vy i~. t~'>=~ ~ r ► ; . ,'i'v, • .4': . The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from ~'~t:;'r',~ , ; : G•>''~-~ " the date of execution belaw. However, the owner(s) ar successor(s) agree that if said RID waiver expires without construction of the required improvements, the owner(s) or successor(s) agree to construct the required improvements at their own . v^r.''kr . r expense, pay to Spokane County the then estimated cost of the required improvements to enable the County to complete the same, or furnish a bond or other secure method suitable to the County (which may include the execution of another RID waiver agreement) providing for or securing to the County the actual construction of the improvements. M wi1+ 'y 11 All of the requirements_ of this agreement shall run with the land and shall be ~y • , . binding upon the owner(s), their successor(s) or assign(s)." This provision is ~ applicable to Barker Road south of Eighth Avenue. ~20. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Vt Local Access standard for the imArovement of all internal roads, which is to be yµ~.r. constructed within the proposed development. This will require the installarion of 36 feet of asphalt. The construction of curbing is also required. HEC S Pa 73 taff Report for PE-1753-94 . ge ,-t,` , R' T2: ry : p~ a';•~i' :w . r K,~' • s~~~,~1~yM~~ . ~ ^y~ . .o.b`t° • i' - : •`A-' r ,i• i~:-?• : ~ e . .Y. J ~ • Z` 'r, ' ft.: t 4 " v `~4 .i: .~~.,Y ' : ;'L`YL:+; • 't r"_• • . ' ' ';,g' • ,wf .f'S.:'`45~ ; ' •v a .9; e a CA.i 1 . .1 ,.B,ti +'t ' . . :::s..~ • 'ra i • r, „Gr . 1 - ~r• YO c,, y. ,>-~r''! ~ ' - " `~1I~t✓ '4'5r.~ ' ,~~:-'r ~ $s r 'E"- ^ ~~~e'?' ++7'.! . ~ t ''-y ~ : . ~-A.., r : ` 21. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Num ber Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Eighth Avenue, which is adjacent to • ` v. the proposed development. This will require the addirion of approximately 30 feet - 'k - of asphalt along the frontage of the development. The construction of curbing and 'sidewalk is also required. . r'"~~;- 'Y . ' ' ~ . ;c~~• , _-•;,1~, _,'`S 22. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, Local Access standard for the improvement of Long Road, which is off-site from this proposal. This will require the addition of 30 feet of asphalt from 8th Avenue,_ "w•~` 4~'y{r north to Fourth Avenue. The construction of a hard surface pedestrian walkway on the east side of Long Road shall also be constructed. ~ ~ • !,il- •s : I Mnr 23. The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number Two, . Minor Arterial standard for the improvement of Barker Road, which is adjacent to and north of the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 32 feet of asphalt along the frontage and north to Appleway. . , ~ ;~'1~~% o k~, ~ . •Y.~ - :.3~'~ s :'.fti 24. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal accePtable to the State HighwaY DePartment of the ProPosed state highwaY-count~_: y~ 5~~' road intersecaon. State Highway Departiment approval of the proposed desigri`must be received prior to.the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the state4hig.hway are the responsib'ility *of the sponsor and may either be constructed or a liond to cover'the-cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amountas' determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Deparaneri~. This provision applies to the IVIDNS requirement relat}n to signaliz tion_of Barker' Road and~ W~ ~ww+nQ _ ~ . . . :a. . , 25. The proposed private road(s) as shown on the preliminary plat serving 81ots with no extension possible has not been approved by the County Engineer. • 26. Private road(s) shall be improved to Spokane County standard for'a priva'te road Urban/Suburban standard serving 81ots, and are subject to approval under Secrion 10.207 of the Spokane County Fire Code. 27. All vested owners shall sign and record private road dacuments as prescribed by the}~~`, Spokane County Engineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to recording with the Spokane County Auditor. Recording numbers shall be referenced in the dedicatory language of the plat. .,28. The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedication: r ~ . "WARNLNG: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, improve, maintain or otherwise service the private roads contained within or provide service to the property described in this plat. By accepting this plat or subsequently by allowing a building pennit to be issued on property on a pnvate road, Spokane County assumes no obligation for said private road, and the owners hereby acknowledge that the CountY has no obligation of anY kind or nature whatsoever to establish, . j examine, survey, construct, alter, repair, improve, maintain or provide drainage or , ".-k. snow removal on a private road. This requirement is and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owner(s), , g their heirs successors or assi ns, t _C... includ.ing the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the private road as , . r:*provided herein." . '.:k• ~ y~ T " l.. l' r3 ~ • aJ , 1 . r.T'3`;.L+ n Page 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 . ..I .y : _f,C' ti L; +r ' ' . ~ ~ Yyr•-i-~fi,~` ~yy1.{,. 1,1n1r1• ~ Jv~.}_+Ai d \ ; ~-us2?"~~:Y~ wr~;.~..,d ~~~ro~t^~'C?r~t'F;- PP., .ri,.~~.,~ . • _ ` 4:~ • _r~- ~,~t• ~ l : Yi.i~ N'} ty~~.~µ f ' ~t , r. t. ,J,'•;: 2, :.~.Y- ~ . F • e`iC'. . • • . ;4 .~,1~ .'~•~.r'~.`~.,.Di• r~ e' ~ Y. - .f'. ~x ~ ~ ~'y'ti _ ( ~ '~f,~a'•:W.. . ' ~•f ; f,~. ' ~ . tlr' - ~ ~ ~ ~i _y~ , ' :~+:.•i,~.` i.,;Tiy' < <y:` -~i.• , . ~ . ,~~•h~~• OY,~r'4 .r •4' •a' .fiM1 i~'t~ ' .~j y~+,ti 4~i,~~E^-" E•~w 4 • y!r- -'~~y.'~ «i: f•;"_ t>~ -"t . • 9 - ,i ^ . ' -`:t 29`. ~ rThe proposed subdivision shall be unproved to the standards set forth in Spokane ~ . 4- County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction. i^ ~ u~fF ~ ; f!'`:_•Ht .Y~`~- i`J~ . v- ' 30. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has detemzined j I \ ~L ' ywt ~•.i ~ that the impact of this pr. oposal upon the existing county road system warrants the <<;= dedication of additional right-of-way and the roadway improvements herein specified. i:'i•'`•,~:~~ _ . ~31'. . The following statement shall be placed in the final plat dedication: "The private road as shown hereon is an easement which provides a means of ingress and egress A for those lots within the subdivision having frontage thereon." ~•T ~•71::~ ~ ,te~. . h. • y , ' w• ,y ' . ~i:rA • • •'~Y 32. The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker Road as a Principle Arterial. The existing right-of-way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan, in addition to the required ~ _ µ r; : t• . right-of-way dedication, a strip of properry 18 feet in width along the Barker Road "frontage shall be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane `~''~j C o u n t y a t t h e ti m e w h e n a r t e ria l i m p r o v e m e n t s a r e m a d e t o B a r k e r R o a d. f ~ ';,y ;:.z• =~F. , t~ 33. There may exist utiliries, either underground or overhead, affecting the subject ~~'b~ property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future acquisition. ~,-fi'r : . , • A& S okane Counry assumes no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. Applicant(s) should check with the applicable utility t.. p _ okane Cqunty Engineer to detennine,whether applicant(s) or urAt `-or and the the ~ s~'~'''for-da1'ustment or relocation costs'and'to make r t1• ~ Fy ~ ,1 Fr ~.7~ ~1,~E,~~7.~ t~, arrangements for any necessary work. . 34. ~ Based on the traffic analysis provided by the applicant t.tie followirig conditions of ~ ay Proval were accePted bY the aPPlicant through a Mitigated Deternunation of tv.• : %i .,:?v +i= °Nonsignificance and would be complied with prior to finalization of the applicable 7,- . . . v ~ . phase: it.c' • ~ ~ •Y~ Y,,•~~~' ~ f•r, ~ i~ Phase I l' ~ ~ ,y • The applicant shall pave Long Road and build the pedestrian walkway in Phase I of the proposal as delineated in the Preliminary plat of record. , ' Phase II ' . . f:j* g•~ •I',4 p The applicant shall install a new traffic signal at Barker Road and the . . ~ ~~p',` Eastbound (south) I-90 ramps. The applicant shall be responsible for design, ~ funding, and construction of the traffic signal along with improvements associated with the traffic signal. The traffic signal and improvements shall meet WSDQT standards. ' ?7' ~:JJ' `'41~~j; • r • The applicant shall place 10 percent of the cost to upgrade the traffic signal at . Barker Road and Appleway in an escrow account managed by Spokane County for future upgrades to the signal at this intersecrion, ~ . t~:~ ~~~i, • 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 Page 75 C$ r:~ r • ~~~'`~.~'~-~'5,:. , ~i- • ~i ° 't. . , . b ~i .f 1, f's . 'i• ,~~~e,~~I~1 .~r _ ~ • " ~1`- ~r;*17! .rft~ • . ' f~ wJr~c ~ v,~.;tT ~-...Z" : F-!.'1~ ~ '~c' r~ 4-.Z .f i,'~-:~•t J r\,.'•.•y'~,~; , ,sr1 r! t ~ ;tT~'Y~. `1 ~j~,°~ . t': 4 ~'i ti ~ T}'.~`:j"~°+~~ ' ~ • ✓iY~ ~ ~ r• { ~ T~ i•~•:~ ,~(~t`-•~'k` n~''~t P 7. _J •~7' ) .;y.l~~} •Y 0~ v~.- t/~ HY<\-~ t' ~ ~Y,S• ti'~aj{r.~ :X'4 .4 ~1 " " • : l~~.ii~`y',i~ ~ 4 • ~ ~ ,~~"~`'~,4~ z , • {~+,~a~;~ .;se:~..'•1'.'~~-t~'k`fi.~-~ • ~ _ : + , . ~ ~ 'r~.-,r? `-.r;: • ?Jy~. `-fr ,.rti3~~'~~ .s°~ •r,~.;?Y j~ ~ r:+;'~.~~'; Phase III . i~i• Y' ~,~:y`.^~i~Ja+~~.5 ~ ~ '~I. ~S• `"f'~ 'v` %5:' a'' The applicant shall submit plans for review and approval by the County Engineer for the prov nt of Barker Road from Eighth Avenue to Appleway to 32 • 35. The applicant shall pro e grad~ng and erosion control plans prior to finalization of an ;i y. phase of the proposed development. . ~ ~ ~ ~s . • ~ti'j(7~Ai' 36. The Private roads as shown on the Prelimin lat are not accePtable to the,CountY µR ~j~~~^~t•~' _4.~~`) ~'Y P Engineer. Redesign of a private road would be required prior to approval of any final plat for this proposal. . . o:.~ • ' r-:~ I~,r SPOKANE COUNTY. DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. ii, •,1~~' - . ~,~'i.~ ~tti ~ 2. Sewerage facilities are not affected by this proposal therefore no recommendation. . r`: ~ 3. The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of ULID by petition method pursuant to F:_: ! RCW 36.94, which petition includes the owner(s)' property; and further not to object by the signing of a protest petirion against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the owner(s)'I~V property: PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or ~ 0. successor(s) from objecting to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either . petition or resolution under RCW Chapter 36.94. •ili; i;7 ~ ~b,~;.a`I > , 4. A licant shall make conn cti n t~Pu li~ o pp e o o b c Sewer System. Sewer Connecti n Pennit is required. • ''~Z~• ~ PR,'.i.:~3 r'•t' 4 5. Plans and specifications for the public faciliries connection are to be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department. Spokane County plan submittal requirements aPP1Y• . . , ` ~ 6. Security shall be deposited with the Utilities Department for construcdon of public facilities connection. ~ " ~ . SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT . 1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted. rt : ~ yR. ty ~i??~ 2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, r R• ~S ~ C Spokane County engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written a. approval of the easements by the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. v . : i. , - Y~ . • 1~ ~ • ~ ' . ~li~~,, ~ « . ♦ y.Gi ; i • -"~t:~. ~ ~ `4`;:.~c`Y.~~,~,~,:~; r ' •.e.. . 9/94 HEC S taff Report for PE-1753-94 ~ Page ' • t `~'w~.',~,'ls rt ( T ' 4 ' ~~{t_~~..' . „ ` yA - . ~?~z v=;3; ~yC- • , ~ - - P.~;,'>i ~j,`:.t;.'..-,. .C.,~.. „ .,~r~_: •~~•;KC,+~rt.;, , . . +t`• , + E .7, . . •b%%'CS E. -.Q j. N'N? {•r~' l . n . ;'c_",~_ ~'S`,~ . , ; y~ i~. ..°il~ ' ~ yyyr:G.,~ ~ t ; . ' i ~ t~ i y2'f~ f F• • • ~alr..r ♦:F~. r. / . `tvy . Y.-tj'ti, . ~ A :1. '+:ir k~ • ~ • " • ,h . d' 'r' ~ 1 ~ ' f. ro~:`' ~ . ri - . * ~ ;,t*' ~ :-a . Ir t~ e l ' ',~c: ~a'•~J~;it_ ~ f,:.e~; , ei~ i ~G _ ' • ' . s'-j`~~a Si2 ~ .s .~z •.y' f ~s° '-~,w' ' ~ ' . . ;i,.~. s{ :Y~;`' !~'t•!: . Nr :3: Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane V . County. a•"'-' ;,R, - + , • ~S •'•hT ` f~ 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Uri.lities, Spokane County. }f~fr b f . * jF9 , t• . C•~* • . " 7' ri° . 5. Water service shall be by an existing+ public water'supply when approved by the " ;r;s''` . Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. gr~~''Ft ~ -'is • ~ ' 6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the `f ' ySpokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is :a, r:i ;'~i$:' 'a, . available to each tract of the plat. :..ey ..a,. •,:aY e ;•.>r' F '4i~ • ~ . , . C► 7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies 'aj•~ ~ N ' . 1..~s':~ within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. 8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan . that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy t6ir respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. r r• 9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water ; _ y.. plan that appropriate conrractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time P71. . ; : - °t4~ schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water , system a.nd inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building pennits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a . _p,rovision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the ~ = - 1~, :x, . a~. ~purveyor harnlless from claims by any tract purchaser refused a building pennit due , . . , , f~•.r:~~ to failure of the plat sponsor to sarisfactorily complete the approved water system. •w - ii Y i~ • 'r ; c: , u 10. A public sewer system will be made available for the plat/project, and individual service will be provided to each lot/tract prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized. , 11. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A public sewer system will be made available for the [platlproject], and individual service will be provided to each lot/tract prior to sale. Use of individual on-site sewage disposal ~ systems shall not be authorized." 12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: *"Use of private wells and water ~ systems is prohibited." 13. The plat dedication shall contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water :system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health authorities, ==the local fire protection district, County Building and Safety Department and water purveyor, sfiall be installed within this plat, and the applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well. as fire protection to each tract prior to sale of each tract and prior to issuance of a building permit for each tract." Y' i~ & ~ . ` ° . 4X, -'{,9%94 HEC Staff Report for PE- 1753-94 Page 77 • ~.••ly" :TJ ~i ♦ . ~ nr • ~ T._,r ~1~, ~ti . . . ' -..EY.~=,v:;}~,=i,'(~q ' • , • . 'va`T. ~'s_-t„.La . a .L" "~"-i..~'il ~.ii 3•. - • - P'- ~ ~ ;s: r~"c.., v.t~( 'r,~'i • k0 ~ , }r~'3~~v~~c;Y,.~~t,,. .r.;>~~i". 4 t ~ir~~{ -'vr d i: ~ ' ~2 ~4. •G~'j` ``~2 ;~1~,`, '-•i•..' ~i r, e• . c.,4•:.'r~,y~~~,ti~ . "fj L ' ~''49~~•.. ~ ~ t•~° { ~.a•~~> A~+ L, ,~.~a.~a~s~ : ~ct~- .L. .a~ ;~-.,~~i~ ~ t~ on _ _ ;.t, . t ~ • '~'v' , .;b.~ ~ 9• : . . ~ . ' ~ ;.Y 6 ' fti'r . . ~ 7~'}~~t-°,i, • ~;:Cg ~ ~ ~J:r , L- ~ •`,~-~;t }`,Z'~ '4 ' -Ln'- ~ w'a4, . , r ~i ~ 3 ~`~T: ~ r r a5 t•5~'. ~ ~ . j :s~ ~•~f~ , ' ~ At y' ~a~ • ? ~r . ~ i'~F, f ~ Yi~ v . r' ►i : Jb ~i•, ' r-- 2.3y ~a • y•! - `'JJ •~p•"~~,,,^,!`~ .~it~,rr . ~7~+~ : f ~T'C~ w , 4I ~~'t-.~r~ • SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTH RI G~'~~`T' O TY 1. All air pollution regulations must be met. ~~--s; 2. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demoliaon, construction :=j=:'''-,, r and excavation rojects be controlled. This m r p ay equire use of water spraysf tarps i `a'",t*~;c.', _ ~ Y-*, s prinklers or sus pension of activit y d u rin g c e rta i n w e a t h e r c o n d i ti o n s. H a u l r o a d s t4~ ~ should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen materia l must b e ~~~1~ + •~F.. ??.~y.Y controlled, as well as emissions from all other construction-related activities. :"r'"'r - ~r?- +`~-'3r'`.':ry;~,~ r 3. SCAPCA strongly recommends that all traveled surfaces (i.e., ingress, egress, Parking areas, access roads) be Paved and kePt clean to minimize dust emissions. t~• . ~~~;~~~,s 4. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces,- measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. The spraying of roads , . ~f N• ' where tracking occurs, as stated in the checklist, may not be sufficient. Additional ' u .S- ~ ''•r~~ measures may be necessary. ~ . . f~,~ ~1 . 3 S. SCAPCA Regulation I, Article VI, and SCAPCA Regulation II, Article IV, address v~ ~ emission standards. All emission standards must be met. 6. Debris generated as a result of this project must be disposed of by means other than burning (i.e., construction waste, etc.). 0 7. All solid fuel burning devices (wood stoves, pellet stoves, etc.,) must comply wi~th local> state> and federal rules and regulations. .,_•;t~,,r _ ' .~'•r~+` ~7 'K,~. ' `t . Gr•. •~s,~ r~ :~y 4,:'•' t' er~°• r~ . ,M1' `~~t + ~ ~ 'vi v Lx ^p~„ irrv. , f•~~ ~~.e:f;n~~",'s h~•,,• • 'yy ~~"Y'i. i~ .y t,C •~~r:.* ^ ~ '`+i.i~~i ">>c~~1+9 . f,: ; • Y~ 4~7 ~hr;~ ~ ' l, ~~i •:'~J`"IY'~ J !f . ~ ^~%S J ~ tr~~ • ~ ~~`~F ~ ~ . . ~ ~~•C~~ 1 ~ ~I~ R0.~t~ }it~ ♦ j,~ ~ . • y . • ~1~~ W: . 9/94 HEC Staff Report for PE-1753-94 Page~~7$;~~~ A , ' ~ ~ ~ i• ;i~s"+~~r~'~~t ~}r i• " 1:y.' r`.,°~ ' { , ~~•'y y~N~~~~ ' ~j•' : - U VP• ' . r`•; ~;k ~'Sh+'~~; c._• • ;o.,'•.r~.ls.ir ::,•,iy, , 'fi5~ ' , ~,e • ' ~`l.~*~; ~`{~~i~,f~k.~~.• i ~e' ;,o ' • . ,~,-~w ?c~,~!, j, o'. ' *•:i. • . .~~;:~:~_~T~TQ:.~r _ r - 7"~7rP.r ~ `-r~ 3r..~, s-- - ,r - r-~-~ ,c :,y r~`+,- nJ~} rr ~~~';AO~i ~;..ti•..~ 7 s.P"Or' ~V 1 S n.."~.-rC.i.Z'E ~ }~,~4h'rr, - _ ;P ~ 5,y~q ~a'd~ y~i' Lh~'., . 1"1.~~~ r~;' . _r~'~. ` i 2~"-'. ~ ti_ r~~J a~ 'r~g• ,a'`r~~~• r k k~^r e. ~ . .j➢,~1E .LL F`f Ai t ~ •s ky~ 1i #'x~i - ~ j~:{ --l,Y. . ~ ~I ~.r +5 K f " i ~ ~ # ~~in" d 3 - 1 ) ~ l ~ - S J • L~= - S ''-i. ,."'!;f . , 4 , a'~ ~ ~ _ : ' Se • . 7 - f ; ' ° • ~ ° rl', d ~i;-0, jy%,~ ~ _ ` t ' aa:k~ F~r`_•.,~ ~ ~'n~'4=.~`_' ~:.`~=+%-'.z ~ - ~-~~~~i~~~,,;.-r'b?Y~~~~;•, OFF ~ ~F TH~ COIJhITY ENGINEER 4 ~~OK~~~ ~OU~TYy WASFiINGTON , ~-.,r. p'°s`. • - T~;~'~3C~ , ~ - P t„ _ ' r ~,~~ti:~'.t ^~'4 s ..~L•?~JJ'~e~i1~?er'' 1,~y 1`39 T~ ~ ~ poI<e ane Count y P 1 anni ng DL--partmeni; (CLtr~ rp-n t P 1 a n ni n q Adm.l.!"3istratcpT'' ) ~;~4-:~.'~•. Sp~~k:ar~e C~,~_~~rt}~ Enga.ri~er~s Dep~r~;ment _4+r.1, 5i..rBJp SLibdivisicin Ccinditic-ns, hlame Turtl.~ ~~eeE:_Esto ~ ,NumbeI~ 1753--9.4~..- re• Subdl V Zs1ons ~rr~~ fo~. ~.owing~"ConditYons of Appr~-val" fcar° the aF~~~~~ rp-ferericed,I~. sul~~i.~visi~:~sn are suL~mi~Lted to tIyte S~~i:a~~a~~e ~'~~~~€~ty Hnaring 'E.. ;ne~=~rn ~.i _ Corrti mi~ ~ ~ ~ for i. n c1 usa. cin in the " Plan n in g Fd epc¢ r1i " and "Fi rf d_ iln ~ s s.r - ' . ' ar~ d C3r~der`" °f t t~ e p ~fi~ P~~.ic I-, ear~ ing scF~~ eci~_~ 1 d ~ep em I~ er , ' 1'~''~ • ` - { E I The coriclitisDria1 c-►ppy-ov~~ ~~f th~ plat is giuen byr the Counfi:ky Erigii~~~~ s-ub.j~ct- to dedi~ation --.f riqht-of -µway anc~ ~ppr°oval , ~ f th~~ ~ ~ ~ ad s}r steir~ ~ s in da cated i~ the pr~ eli mi nary p 1 a ~ i~l ~ ' r~co1 5J o ~'ro• ti ' • .i E 2 -I"hat plansp prof.i1.es and cro~~ ~~~tior~~ ~s designed tc- - 2County standards showing proposed street centerlirip- L4nti r-+_t-rID grades be sFFtbmitted tC_J thP_ COUnty EFfgir~eE-r~ fcor appfroval. pr~ ior ~ const r+_t ction an ci I ~ the f ilir~ g of fir7 c-A3. P1at q ~p- - , . r~~ad p1 a n s tF~ ~ ~ ~ pared und~ ~ ~ e direction -of a 1 icerf secJ Pr'ofe5sionaI Civil Engineern , ..p . ~ , 3 That drairtiaqe ~lan5 ~~r3d desiqri calc.ulat.i.ons sI-:owing the alignment of draa~~~~~ ~~~cilities be sF_bbm.i~ted tc- tI-ie Count}r s Engirieer f+Dr cipprc-val pra.or to con~~truc::txcin andJofr the- f.4. lJL 3 f g of Lr he fwL. E 1 al plC.9 tu D1 ainS~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s to be p1 epa# i"5 d Ltficler tk'~~ direc#:i.-Dn of a li.r-Onsed F'rr~fe~si~.~n~-il Civil Engineera ~r . . ;a ~ E 4 Trr ~ t the reoul~ ticif-f s w~ f the Nati on ~--_t Z ~ lo+=a d T r~ surance Prc} grarn be ot~~~rved siiice the pr~~~posed plai; a~ ~~sociated with an ~~ea c-#f speci~~ flood harardp A devpL-Dpa7ent permY.t ~~all be lji~~ained ~rom t~~~ Coi-tnty Engineer bef~~~~~ construction or deVel'Dpment begins or~ ~~-iy proper-#:y all c~r a p=~rti.on of which is in an~r ~~rea ~w~~f speca~a}. fl~,~~,r~ ~~r(J ~:refer~er~ce Sp~~Etiane CciLtr~ty ardinance 88-0521. :I That the fo1 }.#_++~~ng statenent si-~al1 appear wa_thin tiie dedicator-y 3. anguage of the p lath } y. 3'i~4* ' Z aR'd SF~ t -~S~l~~a' + _~~,6 ' 1-'~~r-~~~ ~~,Q~~~ -d';~ i p_ ~ ~ l. ' `'k; - . r, - ' • _ ; ~ • • . _ --r~ • ~:7 . e ~ _ , J - ' ~ rs ~ _ . . ' p:y. • _:~t . v_ ~f' -4 C' ,r~'' : - F t ~ ~ • , • i r t'~i~ ~~~f; ~ ~ : i1J . . _ - -~{e:;.: ~ ; • , f^~.: s.:~„t~ R$,~7 a►i;I~ f ~t y~ i yaM ~ • J ~ Iv y ..'iL'i~`~L 4 . ,YJ ' • ' • V' ('~e:r PC1 ~ ^ ~ ] 4~ . • 'r: ~ - f~ . e~"d':i ~P,~'~• "L7evelopment withii-i this subdivision shall conform t~D the requirements of the hlational F1ood InsLtrance Program and--''`Y-~' Chaptcr 3.20 of the Spokane County Code. I'l_trchaser- s ~_if property in tfiis 5utlCllVl.sl.on are warned of possible- floodin Q or pcondinq and the p-Dtential reqLixrement to purchase F].ood. •'°'S~i-t~Fz.. Znsurance. Thi.s wc-irniriq sF-iall tae carried in each and every deed drawn to transfer ownership c-f any and a11 property . wi•thi.n this plat in the Area of Specxal F7oocl Ha: arda " E 5 Conatri_icti-Dn witliin the proposed pliblic street s and ' easements sF-iall be performecl Linder the clirect supervis.i..on of . ' a licensed enqineer/surveyc-r9 wh-D shall fi_trnial-i the Couni:y.:;. ~ ' wb~''•. Eriqincer wi.th "As EtLti 1t" plans and a certifi cate in wr.i.t.in1i. . . that al l imIDrovPmeiits were a.nsta11ed to i:he liner and Ur-'ac~es shoW rl ot"1 the c7 pp1'' oV eC.~ Co("i stYLl C t 1of l plc111 s an d thc~ t al1 diStl_irberi monLiments have been rep1acPda z~ . E 6 N-D ronstrur_tion work: is to be performed withi.n the existi.ng ~ ~ ~ ~ r~~ r-p~°~_ sec~ f'i_~ I~ l. i c I3i W I-t~i:-~~_-~ i f -W ay .i n t x 1 ~t per~m it F~ a s b eer~ issi_ted by the CoL~ knty Enc~i.neer a Al. 1 wr~_ ~rk: is s_tbject t o inspectic--n and approval. by the Couni;y Enqiiieer. c ~ . - . ~ • , E 7 A 1 1 construction w i. thi n t he exi. st i. ng or p ropc-aeci PLi h 1 i c Riqht•- •1°_-f-Way is i:il be c~"'~ .~mpl@ted pri~ i_r to -filinq the final p1 a t oi, a bon d i. n t hie am oun{: e, t i m a•t ecl b y tI-ie C: ou n ty . E n g i n eer tc, CoVeY the Coc` tcof oI"1 s'L" 1`' i_l Ct1 ciI-i of 1 fYi ~.71'' c-V efYl @ 17 i: 55 y . a~. Con5 t1'' l.t C t 1oI'i CeY t 1 f 1. Cat1oi"1 y "As Buil'f " plan5 c7 tl d ffl onUmenti nq . . the street ce-nterla.nes sh~..~11 tae fi.leci with f:he County Eriqineere . , E1 1"fhat appropricite provision be m~.~de that thE fol1owxnq described property be hcld in truat uni;il tI-ie c-Dntii-IlAata.or-i ftt-ie s•t reet s be cJ ed i. r. ater! or cJ Eed ed o A 1 f t„ st r ip a•E t he encis or edUPS of a11 str~ets tl-,~t terminate or bord~r the . plat bolAndary. (Tempc-r~.zry eu1 de sacs are reyuired when streets termina{:e at tl-ie plat boundarieso ) E12 The applicant should bE aciviseci that individi_«]. drivew~.~y ' aC G E.' a 5 p e rmit a c.~ 1' e 1'' eql_l 11' ed p r ior t! i 15 S i_t c.~ 11 C E' of ci blAi. 1(Ji n q permit foDr driveway approaches ~i.--•- the COUnty roacl systemo •.~.;i C13 Dedicati-Dn of 2_feet of additic-nal Right-of-Way a1c-nq Par-- ~::eL,_-- Road o - . , ~'.i"~.~ ~ • ~ } r Oa'}~•'.>' placed in plat dediGation th,c-it nc, E14 A statement shal 1 be ' L'.. `~~f.'y"~~~~t• , direct access be a11,--.wed frorri lots to Barker Road. . - ' .'I.1 • ~ •.+il ~ • ~ a ~ .~Y~ J , . ' ~ • , . ' ~'.1 . . , . L° . . - , . ; J . : y+ . ~+'.V', i- . ' t ' .t7 f~~~ y~'.jr. e : •1:~ a . • •o, 1~.~~' ; ,i:,Z ' . .~':a. ~'•~,~•xt~.K~~~' ~`t~. . ( • ~ .J.` t• . !~'.:r~~ _ - rj . rY i•~' ~Y <.~`y; • ~;.'a~ r=~ - ~ ~~i i`•• ~'~1 ~'r -4i r F"~,~.,"~' . S, t•~~`' ~ j Pa9e r4c r` `0 ' ~ ~ t~~'f. ~ . 's~ . E15 TI-iat a statement be placed in the plat dedicaticin providing ; for future s1ope easements.as reqLti.red by Spok:ane CoLtnty al-J iiq B2rLer-Road s ;i:'~.~• E16 ExiCtinct Cc-unty roar15 providinq direct access to the plat shall be paved anci/or cLtrbed to 5poa::ane COLtnty standardso ~ E17 That a11 pLibli.c roc~ds within the plat be clEsigned and ; constructed t~~~ ~pclE::ane C~~-unty standards. ' • - E18 Sidewalk:s are reGLtircd aloric1 the arter-ial ori Bark:er_R~c-ado E19 T he wor d "apP 1 i cai-it"sha 1 1 i n c 1i_tde tI-~ e ow ner orow ner s T~ -t:l-~~e pr~ ~perty, his heirs, assigns and suc r~~scirs. E20 To construct ti-ie road improvements stated herein9 thic applicant mayy, with ttic approvax of the C;~-ILinty Engi.necr9 .jcnin in and be a wi 1]. inc1 parti ci.pant in ~.~i-ly petii:ion or ; . 1'' f:? sol i_l t1. c--n W f'I 1. f'I pu1'' poses is tf'ie foY' fYl at1 oI"1 of c~ Roa"l d - Tmprovement District (RID) for s<aid im~rovements pi_irsi_tai-it to FtCW ^6d 88, as ameridec3o At SUch time as an RIA is Greated oi, • ' any Road Improvement Pro.jPCt a~s sai'1Ctloned lay Spok:ai-ie County9 tt-ip a.mprc.-vements requi.recJ (r.i_trbq sidewa1k:, drai.nage . . contro1 and pava.i-ig •to e:,istiilcl pavement) wi11 be at i;he so1e expen~e ofi i:he Ltndersigned c-wnerp their 1-ieirs9 qrantees ancl . assignr. Th.is provisicsn ir ~.applicalale to Bara::er Roar.i Soi_tth i...i'f 8th P► V C I'1 l_t en F:21 As an alterna-tive method of cc-nstructing thE road im~rovement stated hereinq tfie applirant may9 with i;he ~ ~.~pproval of the Coi_tnty Enqineer 9 ac cc-mpl ish the ro~.ad impr-Dvcmeni:s stated hereii-i by .joining and partir_ip~..atinq in a Gount y Rcia d F' ro. jec t (G Ft P) to t h e e f; t e n t of t he r E qi_ti re cl road improvement p At suc h t ime as an RI D is created cor any Road ]:mFarovement Rr-D.ject is sarictiiDned tay SpoN:ane CoLti7tyy, the improvements req+_iired (curb, sidewalk, drainaqe contro1 and pavinq to exi.stinq pavement) wi11 bP at the sc)lE e:.pense ,_,f • `~'~t the undersigned owner, tl-ieir heirs, qrai-itees and aasiqnso 'I-hi s c ond i. t ion is app1 i. c ab 1 e tc, E{ar a:: e r Road sout h f 8 t h : ~ Aveni_te. E22 That tF•ie fo11owinq statemerit st-ial lc-xppear within the b S~ U • ~C ; ~ dedicatory lanqL«qe iDf 1;I-ie final plato . t ~ a~~r. ~ • : ~ , . . i - , s ~''3'it'" • . c> ' 1 r - t h ~ My - l: . I t . . ,S ~ ' ` ~ • ~ • _ - ~,f ~ v I _ •drl` . ' y"• .,;3{t ~`~_c' t, ti C• . • : _ t ~'~:w~~;~- , b e ~~Y.t-1 .:a+`- , ~r~~)J ~,t~' ~ ~ • • ~ ~3 ~ ~P~~ . ~ - ~a '+~('±4'y'a'~ Y ? 1 ♦ ~r tii•' ~ d'a Y'~"~y : y'~ti 1". i .~t, ~cF N,•_~,~~.,.i~`: - ~y •ti- „ ' ^ f~. ~ ~t:•. ti,~ ~ paqe' 4~;:r~.;;~. • . . 1 h~e coW(l21' (5) CO1' 5UC CeS5o1' (5) 111 ini;erest aQl'C?E to autF1o1r1.7.E~.~ SpoE::ane C~ 'Linty to p1ace their name(s) on c-i-petiticin for tf,e N: . . formai:ion of a Road Improvement District (RTD) by the petition method pursL«nt to Chapter 36e 88 RCW, which petition inclUdes the ~ ---wner(s ) pr----.perty, and f+_irther rnot to - •A~~~~:.' `~y,~ ~ ob.ject, by the siqnirig of zt ballot9 the fr_)rmation cif a RTD r by the resolution method pi_trsi_tant tc-, Chapter- 360 88 RCW, w+hich re so1ution i.ricludes the owner(s) propertyo If a RID is fo~-~ rmed by ei~:l-~er tl-je petiti~-~_r~ _r- r-eso~-~ 1t _~~:i_n method, as provided ~fcir in Ct-iapter 36o 88 RCWp the owner. - ° ° i~) or succ~~sor(s) further aQreeo (1) that the improvem~i-itis or c.nstri _~cti~n c-i _ntempl-~i;ed w~.tF~iri the pr-~_-op~_~ '~ed f~ID is a~~► ~ fea5ib1e, That tI-je benefits to be der-ived from tI-ie formation of the RTD by tF-iE property inclLtdecl therein, toqether witt-i tI-►e amount cif any Cc-unty parf:icipatic-n, , E' a: C: e? eC~ C the C: ~~o~.i'~ c~ f 1 f.i G p~' I-1 e ~~-f f ~ ~ Y (Tl c~~:1 (1 f t f'1 e R I D y c~ Cl C~ u.. (3) i : I-~ at the p roDperty wit hi n tI-te proposed R I D i s suf-ficien-tly developede Provided, f LtrthEYy the -owneti, (s) oi- sijCCE'S5or (s) shal1 r-etai.n the ri.ght, as authorxzeci Ltnder RCW . 36p8a.090y to c-b,.J E' C: t t: o arl y c1 Ss~.' S 5 fTl ent(5) oI"1 the pY ope 1'' j; c.~ a a resi_i1t of tl-ie irnpr-Dvements cai led for in r_ori.juncticin wa th t he for mat ionofa R Z D byei t i-ie r pet i. t icinc-r r~so1uticin . C •m etI-i d Lin der C hap i; er 36.88 RC W q cn c~ to aFipr~.~a ti-~ t he Si_tpera.or COUrt the dpri.sion ~~~f the Board cof County . Comm.issi.o11F?Y'a aff1Y'fn1.f1Q the f1.tlal ~ssL-'SSfT1eilt 1`'oa.l. Tt is fk.irthPr aGreed tI-ia1: ai: 5uch •time as an RTD is • . cr-eai:@d or ariy Road Improvement I'r c-.ject is sanctioned lay . " . , Spc-F::ar~~ Coun1:y, i:I-iE i.mprovements required c:curbq sidewaa.k:9 ~ • ~ drairiaqe cc-ntro1 an(J pavinq) will lae at the sole expense of ~ the LtnrJersiunecl ownerq their he.irs9 grantees and assiAns witl-ioi_tt parf:icipai:icon by Spc-k:ane C~~ounty. I't-ie FRID waiver cori'L°airiecl iri th-iis aQY' -C.'e(T1E'I`lt shal. 1expi.re afi:er- i:en (10) years fr-Dm the date of execL~~icin be1i-jw. F°Iowevcrq the owner c:s? or succe asor(s) aqree that if said I;TD waiver expires wii;houi: construr_ti-.-n ----f the reqi_tired ~ improvemcantsq triE' oWn(.=?Y' (s) oY ..t"auCCessoY (s) aCaY'~~ to c-Di-iatruct the reql_tireci impr-Dvemeni;~ at tI-ieir own e:.pense9 pay t~ ~poE::ane GOLtnty the then estimal:eci cost of the reyua.red improvemen~~ ~-D enable tI-ie Couni:y to compl.ete the sa me;or fLir n ish a bon d orot her se cLtr e met hod sLt i tab 1 F t---, theCouri t y C w I -ii c h may i i-ic 1 ud e{: i-ie execLtt iconof a not he r R]: D Wa1.VE'1'' aCIYEefYIE'flt.~ 9 F]1`'~w-Vli~ll'iQ f~~oi" ~~1'' SEC~_~rinq t~~ the C~~Urlty . ~ . tI-iPactLta1 con s t ruc t ion c-f t he i m p rov e me n t s e Al.l cofi tl-ie reyuirement s iDf tFi:is aqreemerit shial.l rl_tn witfi the land and shal l he binciinq upcon the owner- (s)g their C.ii_ICCE~so1`'(5) oY assiqri(s)o rhis PY'oV1.5i-Df1 ls aPp11.Cat7le to Ba rker Rc-a d sc-ut h of 8 t h Aveni_te a . , • . ' s~s ~ . , - . j ~~y f ~ iiu(~~, ~~[.'J ~ y• 1l,"~~~ ~ _ . ~If~'~~~~1 : ♦ . S~. b~ty ~t ~ ~'YF' ~i • : ~ ^ ~h~~~~~'eY . _ ;^''i~~ ] ' ~•t•~ ` ~'r/ yQ ~~w.1 ~ 4/~ ~rt~_ w.. w'V_Jai-;Q.B'~ . ~b A. M~. ~ ' • • . r; i 't .'f`' ' , Si~: ~ 'd , l Y1' . ~'4 •7r i ! ,j ~ . i. :A :.aT':Kr~C~ . • ~~~~i', , ~ " k;~~ ~'a . - • ' `~~1 'r~'• f' `'t• . ,'~`::a~~•a ~~~}}`•;ti:._i~ • • •Ff `~lG~l RaQe, J. . E273 The C~n•L- Ei~ iric~er h~.~s desiqilated T ical f~~_~ad Y ~ YP way Seci:i-.~_~n r..+~s-'~ NLimber Two, _l_2cal_Acces» standarcl for the improvement of iriternal_r-Dads which are to be constructcd within tt~ie propr-~sed developmento This wil l r-eyuire the installatic-n of ^L ftaof as pha1t. T he cons truc{: iori c-f cl_tr b i n c7 i s a1 so required O Y . . -~:r. E24 l"I-ie COLtnty Enqineer P•iaa ciesictr7ated 1'YPical Roadway Section Nuunbcr Two.L _L~~c~~1~Acress si:~~ndar-d f~~r ti-ie impr~~v~r~i~rrt ti~~ ~igl~~:t~~_A_v~n~ie_ wh~ici-~ i5 ad.j~.~cei-~t t~:~ the pr~~p~~sc~d developmentu This wi 1]. requi.re the adclition of, , approximately 30 fto of ~.~spl-ial.t aloi7q the frc-ntaqe cif ti-ie t, development. The constrLiction of Gl_trbing ancJ sai.dewa].Eis a1 so reqLti red p ~ '.~r=.~~~•~f . J>~, - E24 The t::C'Unty Enginep-r- h•iaa designated Typi ca1 Roadwt-ty Sec:ti.on Ni_tmber Acc_ess standard for the improvem~i-it of . 1..ong Road wlixch~is+off,-site_firom_this__prc~Posa1_7his_wil.l •A• rgJ~~~ire_the_adclitiori_=-'f30_feet_oT_aseLial t,_f rom_8th•i_Av_enuF flcil"tl"1~~~,_~Fot,-lrthAVGf1L~lGa rrThGCor1stY"~wlCt]Lofl~of°c1~F1c"11`'d~5ul"faCe LjEC~l~a'~Yl."1f1Wcl~.~:Wc1~/_~~fl__...~h'IE?w~.'e1s~:.--~;i1.ClE? w_~~f`~..~~fiC.~`RCF ~ ~sIlaa. a.~c'1.L5~~ ~7EMCof15tY'i!CtEC'Iu F.:24 The County Enqinr+er has desi.gnatFCi TyFaic~.~l Roadw2y Section IVi'imher 1"w Mi n_r ~A~r ~te~~ia 1s~;anc~4~rci •f~~r- ~:-~e imw ~ ~ r~~-~_ vc~mc~nt -f --~-~s-------~--~-------~_.._.._._.. , . BarE::erRoad_wl-iict-i _is_~..adj~~ce_L-it_tc._and~northof_the'p~,~st'd . . de ve p menj-_Ti-iis_will~reg~~ia.re_tl-ie~adrJition_of ~ . 8p2j:,:-ximatel.y_32_fPet_~,~~fi_aspLialt_,5l!:-ng_the_f rontaqe_gnci : n o~r t1-.i _ t o _A PLl.e way~ E25 That the ~ponsor shai l p>~~~~are and sl_tbmi#: to the GOLtrity Enqineer a desiqn pr ~~~posal ar_ceptable f:o the atate I-ia.ql-iway Dc~partment of tt•ie prciposed State F-liahway-CO►_tnty Road intersecti~ ~no Si:ai:e I-iiqhway DepartrnPni: appriDval of the ~roposed desi.cin mLtst be received prior tc. the fi linp ~of the fia.rial platn Impr-ovements to the State I-l.iqhway are the respc-nsi bi 1 ity c-f t h•ie a pori sor a-n ci mayei t her be construc t e d or ~ bond tiD ccover the r_osi: *of si_tch improvemei7ts fLtrnisl-ied , to -rhe Ccii_tnty Enqz.riePr in the am~~lunt as-, determined hy the Ccii_tnty Ei-iqineer and thie rtate Hiql-iway Department. This Pr-2_v i.sion~~pLol ies_{;o_tl-iri?_MDNS_retirement_rel.ai:ing_t2 I~ign:21ization~of_L-sarE::er-_Road_and_T-9oo - ' , F2L6 The propc-sed private r-c-ad c:s7 as shown on the preliminary p1at servinq 8 liats with no e:•;ten5icin possi.ble has_n~~,~'t_taeen . by the CoDunty Lr-igineer o .i; ~'B~` : Y s• , - ts. t.: . r . a~t ~,~~~`y~~,N~♦ ~'T ~1. ' r. . ' ' " _ ~ ~~2~} i •r} Y y • . t • ' j'.:'~. r :eit - g . •.y1, . . ~ !~~..J . F~~ .'1 ,r . r ' •a • . ~ . ~ `~r'.y ~ , :-M1 . ~ ~V.•_~~• - ~ ~Y '-.±~3~ci~z^• 9• I i t~ "~~C~,f'y,{y f. . ~ ~ TtAti~!~ •r• ~ . J-~0•Y~~ ' pdQt . • - L.~7 TF~~.~~t i vate r~~a d.s~~ . m veri t~~ an e ~ pr~ ~ U~ i(~r~ S~~~k: County si;andard fctr a private road Urbanls!►.bur'ban standarcl servinp S J~~~-~ l-::. tso Sub.ject t-D aPProva1 Linder section 10.207 of the l, :.z~~ SpoE::ane County Fire Code. ~ E30 A1 1 vested owners shal l siqn and recor-rJ private r.---.ad documents as prescribed tiy tF•ie Spok:ane Cc-Ltnty Enqineer. These documents shall be reviewed and approved by tI-ie : SpoEiane Cr_,un1:y Enqineer prior tc, reccerdiny with the -5pok:ane ~ COi ~ ~ _~n~ty f~> _~di.t>-~_r~a Rec_rda.nq nurnbers shall be referenced ii7 • the d e ci i r. t o r y 1 a n quageof t he p 1 za t a . E31 TI-~at ti-ie fo11owing statement be p1acerJ iri the plat - ~i 1..1e4.1icatlono ~ . . ~i WARNIhICo ~pc-k:<ane f_:oi_trity I°ias no responsi bi 1 i i:y to bui1dy impir~M, veq mainLairi or o{:her wise service tl-ie private Y',=-c'1ds contained Wlth11°1 OY (.al''ovirJiriq ta"e1''V1.C:e to tt"Ie p1"opeY'ty i:jeSCI''1FJGCi in this p1at. By acceptinq this plat or . subseyu«ntly by allowinq a buildi.ncl permi-t to tae i.~SLted ori pYopE YtyoIl a P i'' a. Vate Yoady S(.a -Dkaf 1e Goi_l I"1 ty aa SutTl P_ s f 1iD - obliqation fco}, said pri.vate riw-ad aricJ {:he -_-wners hcreby ac 4:: now edqe tha t t I-~ e C-_-unty has no ob1 i qat ionofi a ny E:: i nd or nature wh~.-tsoever to eC►tablish9 ex~-~mine9 si_trveyq constri_tct9 a1•i:er, repair, improvey maintainq provide drainage oDr sneDw • i-emcival on a private roaclo Thia requi.rement is and sFia].I . , ~ ruri w i t h t I-te 1anci ari d rs h~.a 1 1. b e bi. n ci a. i-iUi_tpon t F~ e c--w ner, t he i r rl e1 Y 5 y SLl C C G s> t" c-Y' SoY' c.~ s51 CJ f 1s i ricILtd i n q tfl bl1!.7 c"t t1oI°i t-:;, , p~..~r-ticipate in the main•teriance ofi ti-~e private road as providEd herea.no ks32 T'I~~e prc~posed p1at s!-ia11 kie impirciveci to the standards set fior-tli in SpiDN::ane CoLtrity Board ~_If Commissxoner-s R~sci1ution P.Ion 80-1 a92, as amencledq which es1:abJ.ishes requlata.ons fic-r• Yoatj5y c1ppYoaChCsy cirainaqe and fees lfl f1C-'W CoC15tYuGtXofla E33 "i"fie COLtnty Engineer hG~~ exami.ned this clevelopment proposal ~.~.iici has determined that the impact of this proposal upon 1:he existinU County Road Sys>tcm warrants the ciedication of adclitional Rigiit of Way and the rcoadway improz-vements here.i.n • ' speci-fiedo - e•~~~ ~ .t Eu5 That the followi.nq stC-ttement mi_ist be placed in tfie pl;at Cj ed.1. Catl. o11 a "ThP P Y 1 V ate Yoad c.Z 5 l"I -DW fl 1-1 eY CiDI`1 l 5 cl t`1 , ~ g easement whict-i provides a means of i.ngress and E'qYE55 fcir tfiilre 1ots within the plat havinq frontaqe thereo~n. " • ,T, . : ~~~rrr ~ ~ ~r15,~ j ~ ~ • • , ~ i~ L~; ~;h ~ ~}~G sr - •3 ~i~ . ~ a ~i i e ~ . A~ '9~~F 1~ , • /•P •+1 FY4 • • • fy' . i31~~- , ~ .4 ` , ~cs r'~q,~_ . . , i•. ` ~~a• ' '.e_ 7' I ` - ~i~'u ~ . ,'4r_~~.tw~'4YS~i t 1'~.. •L' ' '`J~~ i ' ~~~~~a ~ Xr!;~~ ' ^l.'~'s••'C:~ , ~ . ' f 'r. . ; yr . a • ' • , . i - :r~t~~k%~~:Jn.' F. ' ) ~1`•~.d .z~s" wy Y .'.~.i.. . • . i `A,•`,?~= . Page 7 . E61 The County Arterial Road Plan identifies Barker_Road as a Principal arterial. The existinq riqht-of-way width ofi 6ii feet'is not conaistent with that specified in the Pl.ano In ry~ i ordEr ti"~ _ implemen-t the Arterial R~ i_ad Plan9 in additi-n t ~_r i_i the rPq+_iired right-of-way dedication, astrip of property_ 18 feet in width along the Bark:er Road froni:age shall be set' r•i' asi.de .in reserveo This property may be acquired by Spok:ane ,:•'Z`~~. GOUnty C-tt the time arterial improvements are made to Barker •~~:';1 R oad . E:90 The applicant shOLild be advised thc-:it ttiere may exist r 'e Ltti 1 ities either i_tnderqround or overhead affecta.nq the appl i cants property, inc 1udinq propPrty to be dedi cated or . • set a5ide for fLtture acqLtiSition. SpoE;ane Couni:y will a5 5 ll f Tl @ f lri fi i n a n c i a1 ot11 1 Q atlr-iI'1 fo1'' aIj ju5tf il E I"1 ts oi'' Y 2 YoC ct t1of i , r.eqardinq these Lttilita.es. TI-ie applicant shOUlri clieck: with the appl i cable Ltti 1 ities and Spok:ane CuLtnty Enqi-neer to determine whether i;l-ie appl i cant or uti 1 ity is responsible . , foY' ad jLl5tfT1e(lt oY YE1iDCatYofl CoC'itS c1r1d tiD fllake arrariqements fior any netessary worF;. . e . .v Special Coriditionsn E{ased c-n the traffic ar7alysis prcivided by the applitant the followinq ccii-iditioris of appri-nval were arcepted by t;he applicant through a Mitigated De•termination of Nonsiqnificance and w~~-ulcl be cc--rnplied wii;hi prior to fxnal.ization of the aprl.icavle phase: F'NASE I T'h~e applicant shall pave Loriq Road ~-tnd bLtild the peclestrian walk:w~.~y i.n Phase Tofi the propiDsal as dPlineated in the preliminary plat of record. PHASE II The applicant sha11 inst~.~ll a new traffic signal at Bark:er R-Dad and the Eastbound 1-90 rampa. The appl i tant shal 1 be responsible for desiqri9 fundinq and construction of •the traffic signal along with improvements associateci wih tl-ie . trG-tffic siqnal. The traffic signal and improvement s shall_ meet WSDOT standardso . ' . rhe applicant shall place 10 pereent of the coat to upqrade,. the traffic signal at Bark:er Road and Appleway in an escrow~t; ac c~ -Ltnt manaqed by Spok:ane County for fLttLtre upqades x'to tfie . signal at this intersectiona ~ • . • . _ -r' ~ PHASE I I I - • The app 1 i cant sha1 1 sLtbmi t p 1 ans fior rev iew a nd;7 ,appritil v4~l. ~by,'~;_~ the Coi_tnty Enqiner fc-r the improvement iDf B ark:ena d;.f,i,m, . . ' ' }r ' Sth AvenLte to APPleway to 32 feet a ' ..i'SJB:_'i~ak`._, •+~~_+...L...... :B. .'1:C4~.._.~ • ' .,.~~1 ~ •,F ' , - l• s - ° ' ~.:f. ( - , • • ' • ~ ` - . - ' , 1'=; • - - : • • ' ~ , ~ ' ~ •Il ~ • • t ~ , page G ` ~ r The appl iant shal 1 provide gradxnq and erosion ccintrol plai-is prior to fi.nali.:ation of any phase of tl-►e proposed dEV21opmen*L-. • 'k.J a~ _ f A The private roads as shown on the lDrel.xmiriary plat are not cicceptable to the CoLinty Enqinecr. Redesign cif a pri.vate rc-ad woLt 1 d be r e q lji rerJ pr a. cir to appr- c-va1of an y f i na1 p 1a1: for f: I-ii s prop os a1 0 • ~ ~ : •t:.' '~'rY'=r;iy: r•, ` ' ~r ~i . ~ t r . ~ f n . • . • • . ' ~ x_, • _ . . ~ . , ~ ~4; ' • • ~ / . ~ v • • . ~ ' . - : • . ' , ' ' ~I ' • . . i • :'r . ti t. . . i '=,.r , ,y • ~ ♦ I ~P;~,;" _ _11~ . ~ _ ....Y-.1G...~ ~~s~{ ~.~..~E•tiO At'_.t~.J • ' '~-'c;~, : • 4w ~ ✓ v d~• . ' 'l.~r: , ' ~ . ' ' _ , ~ ~A.v i~.Jh,~ . lj.~ `~i~•,:~ - • • ~ M,~ . ~ j •j' :a y'• • i ' 41. • % ' ~ . :'1 ~ ~ 1 • R~ t.. {I .Yi ' ~ QFr" i r~ QF THE C+ 1►_.lNTV F-haG:[ NIL'Ek S F Q KA,''J E COUNT Y, WA,-z)h-f :f. NGT 0N Ju:! y 6t, 199, ~ : nt P1arininr . .y~p _.r•~>~ =;~~;:a l"C~~ ~pokane Cclunty F'1anning Di.~par...trneiit (CLtrr-e , 1 ~ . . •2',_~ P"ti dmin istrat+ Ilr ) . _ • . . 'tij j .t{ ~ , ~ 1 •7J7 1= OMo c3 ~ .--F R:: an F- C ounty Er7 g.i neers DepaY' 'L` m et' i 'l ~ ;t~,'.~•y~~,,~k~s.,:~, SUB,~.- S± ! t7 divi si c--~ n Cc:-ri di t ic-rf sy I\i a rri c- l_t r t I c.~ _ C, rei:: k: _ dJ a ..Y ~ . p,• ~ f~~l~ . r=I 1_i rn ka c-, ir ~~J ri C:ti t:, s i a n e d ~•v~'. :f 44~; .Y'~ I r I~ ~ ~ ~ • ' y.~i r e . ~_t r ~ i. v i si. n s _ W~ i:'..... , ca f 1. 1 :l . . w a.r-i ci C _ n cl ~t _ ri ~ f I:~ -c . v a " i° ° r- t e -k ta v ra r~ ~ e r- E n c e cl ~ . ► =i uh d ? Vi t" 3. oll a1'' G? t=a ubfYl i t tG CJ t-:"~ 't 1"i e tiD <:.1ni.? P], at°t i`l it"1 g I'} epr~ r'tmc--mt f-:-jr:i. ri c: lusa. ori n ti°~ e Dcz-si crln F7 rti-v i. ew I"I F? et?. ng .s C: I"i E:? cl i_l .I. C C:I n~ JI.,(1 y •R ~ . ~ ' ' . u' Af•L er r ev iew of th•,.z s ppl~~. c rt t:.-cm o p:L aty the C; ~ luri ty E n rI ii rt ci~ ee- ' r° c:~ cc-m m enci s tl"I.-:it a t1'' affi_ C ~L:k11 i. i a. ys:Jl. :-i bH ci!'1 tr1 .L s p1'" o,) C'? t _ 1J F:~ i'" : L i" ~ : ~ : ~ ~ s ~ •F ~ k~ :G i sIfYi f ~ o :.1 ~'I 1. i:' fil I"1 ic1 I"1 cA f7 C~' ~'i Cj <w1 r ~'1 C~ Ea ~a a. c~ a r~ • - ~ ' ' ~ s f°► a l. 1 r-e v :i ta w Bar- k: eir Rc-lc3 d ;:a r~ d of f -s i te- :.i. c~ ts t-w- t, !-i fa t C -:.-j l..4 ri t y . . ' _ ` ~ . 'Y" c1 c1. l:1 ty l. f1 Cll..l t=l1. (l g 'f; hE.' i:---'f E:1L C:) i"I th cl. P1 CI B cA Y' t-.: C' i'' R o ai cl , a !°l d S p 1'° ::.-.i, i~,~ u e ci f I cl B a 1'' 1•:: 1'' FC d ~ Based co'l -1--}'' iCla. i'1 al !'1 d C< ez: ti!'1a'G iof`i c:l I"1 alys1.. ~:'s Lc--fl g Ro-Dc°t d m.Ea y ti eed 't: cl bc-ry Y' 1.:..~ tf 1. c:' l 1 ed 'fc-j,' capc;l f' it'/ r:t s 4a E? ll. ~ Y T ~ t~o tt ~ •'A~~ , ~ ~1 ' ` ~r'I v`i. • , • • t~ i': ~ ..fi,~i'.-' 'y~ . ' ~ . a .h . S'r' • ~ . . : ♦~~~t4i~ ~64 2,i: G' • 't~• . , ,cr y i' . fe~'~ , ~ r ~ • . : ' . ~ f: i~~?~ , ~ fl " j ~`~'1. . . , • . ~ t : ~ . . kis~~t. ~ 1 ' " .+~'e. : -e ' e •i; ,'r ~"'a~_ ;S. ~~Y.o~4~aw ~ , ; • f~ r~ . . 1-~''~4,~lrt'v, " ' i+ i' ~ ~'Y ! " ij~ e~1t♦ ' r ~1 , . . . • 'i i P ^ t, `P'i • ` ~4.y~ M ,,,i~ L • ~ ~ • ~ ~ , r,~ , ♦,.1LCL~. 1 9.. bw.., ny `,T 4.; . •:~'vy;j~ ( ' . • , • .3.' :-gt - , • ; . • , r . ~ . . ' i iiy~,• feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report Viewerueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee; OPAG E 4 14 : 0 4: 10 2 3 JUN 19~9-4 . °Road# R o ad Na m e s.......... MPost. R e f e r e nce De s c r i p t i o R o a d L o g I n f o.....:Jr:~:~:: . ° 0 3. 2 0 0 WARREN RD ( END ) .tU ; 16 PAVED ° s• 0 3. 2 9 0ADAMS RD ,U_~16 PAVED 2 2 ° 03.330 MARCUS RD ( END ) ' U~"16 PAVED `~2 20 ° 03.380 MARIGOLD RD (END) U 16 PAVED •'22 ° 03.450 BURNS RD (END) U 16 PAVED . ~.220 03.540 PROGRES S RD U 16 PAVED 22 ° 8TH AV (END) 03 . 800 SULLIVAN RD •>a~~~;,:: 005868 8TH AV (START) 00._000 LONG RD (START) U 19 GRAVEL 1 . 4-~ ~ • ° 8TH AV 00.500 BARKER RD U 17 LIGHT BITt~M:~ 18 01.010 HODGES RD (START) U 17 LIGHT~~ ° r BITUM. v18~ , ~ . . . _ , ° 01.210 COLONIAL DR (START) U 17 LIGHT ~ITUM: 18.0 ~ ° 01.330 GLENBROOK ST (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM:~ 18. ° 8 TH AV ( END ) 01.510 HENRY RD 005867 8TH AV (START) . 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM.'., 20-1.'; • ° 8TH AV (END) 00.240 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) ~;Lt~, . , y: • a 005869 8TH AV (LIBERTY LAKE 00.000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE R 09 GRAVEL,,`=;` 12'' 00.020 MCKINZIE RD (LIBERTY R 09 GRAVEL' 12 ° 00.150 GARRY RD (LIBERTY LA R 09 GRAVEL 18 M aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef:, °List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [Fi] for help) ° uaaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaaaaaa,ci 'aaaaaaaaaaca's~aaa aa(; , ...~?'o . ° Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page . `f Jl ' ' 4.ti~~yT ' 1A t„ • : , ' s ~5 u, Kq , ~ , . . f r 7 :~il a r 1ya ~j ^:tv O~SA ~t si ~ iy I S.q 1.b : y4 •'1, : ~ ~ ;;~`r t .~a +t '~y~ ~'Ii.,,°~`~ % • ~ °t,,,,Sq. : r,` ✓ F, ~ ~~.i~: ,'T r~ff;j e k• 's , rr.,iq a ' '•S:t,~ ~A CFa'~ , t } 1 • . •f % .~fL`tik _ r,~ • ' '~,C},.. ~ ~qyN.4. . „ • , 1 .:s:y' ~ ~~:~a .~:1',.. 4~~.: _ : . A.~~ ' ~ `<,J, i::','°A;, ! eaY♦ ,,c 1 ^y j f t✓ Il F r 'S~:r'''r_ r,' ~~ii?,'d'vMy'~?,~, •i ? • i sl' ' .a. . . :P ~'t;.~ 's-.. . . _ y; . :'r• , ` v : e r ' ' a . T, ' ' ,''t _ I '•~9r _ ' . ~i , , . ' • • l . . , . x.L, . ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~Report Viewerueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~~ ~:;e o pAGE 1 14 : 0 4: 21 23 JUN 19 4~; o °Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference DescriPtio Road Log Info.... 000433 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #1 00.000 SOUTH END OF RQAD R:09 PAVED 0 ~,f: ° BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #1 00.020 JACKSON DR .~R'd 09 PAVED '-``t40 000434 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #2 00.000 MONTGOMERY DR R~'09 PAVED -400 ° BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #2 00.050 NORTH END OF ROAD r• 000435 BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #3 00.000 MONTGOMERY DR R 09 PAVED .40° ° BARKER CUL-DE-SAC #3 00.050 NORTH END OF ROAD r•;t~.:... , 00 . 000 32ND AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM::{.~,, .:15:°~1•''%. 000230 BARKER RD (START) tl ~ ° BARKER RD 01.820 8TH AV U 16 LIGHT BIT.sUM,:,, 8 ~ ° 02 . 080 4TH AV ~ U 16 LIGHT BITUM ~18 • ;s. , . . ~ 02.210 2ND AVE (START) " U 16 LIGHT~;~:BITLIM. ° 02.330 SPRAGUE AV U 16 LIGHT BIT_LTff:%, f .r•c „Ly..• ;,y. o r• 02.510 LABERRY DR (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM:`` ~•,•?{''-2'2~~?~'° „t 0 02 . 53 0 BOW AV (END) U 16 LIGHT BITUM;~r 0 02.570 APPLEWAY AV U 14 PAVED ~ 36y~1' a ';1✓'~:} ~...3 6:°„~~~ 02.640 COWLEY AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 0 02.730 ALKI AV U 14 PAVED 60 02.800 BROADWAY AVE /`END) U 14 PA~IED ~ 3 6° ; ♦ . Y~.~ ' •'1 0 02.830 BROADWAY AV (START) U 14 PAVED 36 • s aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef v °List~~°,, „ °Use,Direction,Keys,to,View,Report,(Pre:ss,[F1],:for~help) „ Qddaaaaea,aaiaaeaadaaadaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa&aaaaaa aa a a a a - aaaaaa(; °Esc-Exit Enter-Next Paqe • ° ' -,I •`•}~~1 „ . ~ 9 • r ' . t / t . ..yH.X ' f}~ 7J",.,e k . y . ryr • ; r' E , • , 7 'j- \ J v' + +,3`~;~jr ~ . t~• 4T T3✓T 1: f •i 1 • •`,Fr_ -.~Tr) ~ r f d ~ ~ ' ~y Y T pv k,° , • .5 n. •f - . ~f;. • • ~ j ' "y~^ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,•-.~r . ~ pk,. 19y,.,~ a ' , ' ~ • . .1} ,1ti~ ♦'t;~'4:' . y ra• • , ~lY L,~,$''~ . ti; ; . i• . ~ `w p,d;~1j,,!, ,.q~ •'ti 'J • , ' ~°Y <5 fi. '1-+• . <j~ ~ Y ~f ' • `,ISit. . L3Ly ~ . .iy:~~S. =~4 ~~b« • , 'a' . ~~r •J+'"t•lt r . • . , . . _ . ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegReport Viewerueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee~~e~Hi"N OPAGE 1 14 : 0 5: 0 4 23 JUN 19; ~NI° MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info....:-:~~=.;; °Road# Road Names.......... r aa•~2 _ 002590 LONG LAKE RD (START) 00.000 LINCOLN COUNTY LINE R, 07 LIGHT B,ITUM. ° ° LONG LAKE RD 00.630 COYOTE RIDGE LN 07 LIGHT BITUM. 0 04.470 GRAY RD (START) rR'~07 LIGHT -BITUM. ° ~ 0 05,000 SOUTH BANK RD (START R 07 LIGHT BITUM. 28 . ° LONG LAKE RD (END) 05.740 CHARLES RD R 07 LIGHT BITUM. .•280 ° 0 2 5 7 8 LONG RD ( START ) 0 0. 0 0 0 WH I TMAN COUNTY LI NE R 09 GRAVEL-. 03.390 MARTIN RD (END) R 09 GRAVEI~Y 18~° ~ ° LONG RD ° LONG RD ( END ) 06.160 ROCK LAKE RD , ~ `i'' ~a '•Y' `Y' 00.000 8 TH AV (START)-..- U 19 GRAVEL 1,6 °02579 LONG RD (START) ° LONG RD 0 0. 0 8 0 6 TH AV ( END ) U 19 GRAVEL U 19 GRAVEL ;~s ~ . • ~~1'6° , ~ 00.120 4 TH AV ( START ) ~H 0 00.340 2ND AV (END) U 19 PAVED . ° LONG RD ( END ) 00.470 SPRAGUE AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM,.:.. -1-8, s,~,~,, , ° 0 2 5 81 LONG RD ( START ) 0 0. 0 0 0 APPLEWAY AV U 19 PAVED 6 ° LONG RD 00.120 COWLEY AV U 19 PAVED ti 169 'j 0 LKI AV U 19 LIGHT BI-TLJM. 00.310 A 16'• . 0 00.380 SPRINGFIELD AV (STAR U 19 LIGHT BITUM.f-L~'"j' 16 ~~,4•0 00.420 BROADWAY AV ( END ) U 19 LIGHT BITUM.`I:';` 16 . aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef t °List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Pr:ess[F1] for help) 4~, ° . , ~C;: ~ . , , ,,.~,uaaaaaaea.,.aaa..a.aeaaaa..., ,aaaa.-,. '.,aaaaaaaaaa.aaa.,,.,,.. ,-.~~~.,aa, a ~aaaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaq O ° Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page .'k 4 • . .J . . w Cr • f ' P A: . ' ' . ; - S: a~ . • 4 . d t. {4 a~z;. ; 6i ,i. • ;:Mi • :t~ 'xl :Sk.. , § ~j t. • , '~c•,'~ • p •W T ) ~jy` '5,,, ' . If; ~ ~ R. 4 r~ • '.v ~ '~-r . ' 1i. ' • rY ~~r 41 7^1 c 1•1a ,5.~ . . ai V - ' k, ~ •ti y7$s~5 . +~,y •'`,S ~~AhG~ 1• = i i. , ~~t.~~'iS~ ♦ i'.:F>i.: ~r . . , Z~f~ 1•,'* r.i r4,~.:{ ' • - . ~ : i, . ;y~:"y. .~i' ' =i.'.7'.._.. iYiiFiA.J- s..?4 f1 ' ' f S ' , • . . ' ry S . . 1 fn . 'f . ' • _ . a.. -maaaaaaaaaaaaaC.aaaaaaa aaaaaaaac'i aaaaaaaaaaaaaci aaaaaaaaaaaac aci aaaaaaaaaaciaaan -u Traf f ic Counts - .rx.~'~'. ~~-~aaa a.-aa,-a a~„aaa a~.-aa.'aaa..'~aa aa.,o.. aaa..,-aa„N~ ~ aaaaa..,.aa,~-.-„aaaaaaaa aa~.,.~aa a~~ ...oaaaoaaaa aa . r u,~~ ttaaa oaaaa a aa~aq~~°_o °Road Name °Location °Leg° Cou..rit,, ~~ttaaaeaaaaaaaaa4ci aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaci aaci aaaaclaaaaaaaeaaaeaaaaaaaea rt tt 1>BARKER RD °at 8TH AV °N ° 0,0871 ~ tx 20BARKER RD ° at S TH AV ° S ° 0 0561 •~x; tt 30BARKER RD ° at SPRAGUE AV ° N °'20 2 b 4 2 Ytt. 0 40BARKER RD °at SPRAGUE AV ° S ° 020651 koy {•:.r.: ,0 50BARKER RD ° at APPLEWAY AV ° N 0 0 6~0 6 9, 3~'• `'r' • - •r ' .~_~S 0 6 ° BARKER RD ° at APPLEWAY AV -1f: , • ° S ° -~0;4'02 2 +y~'~. . .e i •te;.`,1 -tt 70BARKER RD ° at CATALDO RD ( STA.RT ) ° N ,;1?Y3 2 4 2.. n 80BARKER RD ° at CATALDO RD ( START ) ° S 9 7 3 4.,. ii= .a;`' tt 90BARKER RD °at MISSION AV °N ° 061,`46, tt 10 ° BARKER RD ° at MI S S I ON AV ° S ° 0 7_~i tt 110BARKER RD . °at EUCLID AV (START) °N ° 3&O7~tt 12 °BARKER RD °at EUCLID AV (START) °S ° 6-463`~!tt' 0 13 ° BARKER RD ( END ) ° at SR 290 ( TRENT w ° S 02 7 02 zc 14 °BARKER RD (START) °at 32ND AV ' °N ° 00460'V4~i -~aaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaacAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacAciaaaaaaaaciaaaaaaaaa~aa~ k. , . ; °Pop Up°Single°Select row by pressing [Return) or enter"row:number [Esc]=~Exit o uaaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaa~ ..t• ~t • ~~,PgDn-Next Page ° °Esc-Exit F1-Help Enter-Select Item AnyText-Search`,~~~f~or rtext::• ° `Y~v~r~'• • ~a • ' ~J 7 . • . . . ' c F` ~ . _ .~'•r t ~j u A n . ' i: ~ ~ ' % R' ' ' • t Y~ ~ L ' ..7 + ~ t~' t r, , _ . •2 ; ; _,aq . ^Q i ~ ?y" ' ~'r`' •=-ra~ ,~s ' ' ' 19c; ` • ; Rct.. f e •l1-~,~'. j fi~t''f~11:.'i{ bi•. . i, ' t 41 ' S`Lt .r. • R L ,M, _ • • yi u=•' ' i- . ~S ° ' . S' •aI 'I i.•t1 ii • o . ..,vr « - I / / I I/ I/ I I- I I I/ - I I I / I / I I I . I I I I I~ I / I I I / -0aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan~~~:,~~~~• -tt Traf f ic Counts -uaaaoaaaaaaaa&aaaaaaaaaaAaaaaaaoaaaaad aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaoaaaaaaaa"a~4-,, -zc ORoad Name °Location °Leg° l_ Count`'~ix,~~~~.: ~ ttA ~aea6 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa~aa~aaaaeaaaeaaaaaaaaatt;~.~'~ ~ 0 31> SPR.AGUE AV ° at FLORA RD ° W 0 3 2 ° SPRAGUE AV ° at T SCHIRLEY RD ( END ) ° E p ° ~0'2 ~ ~ :,a lq;. + r 0 3 3° SPRAGUE AV ° at BARKER RD ° E fD2 2 7.9 . tt 340SPRAGUE AV °at BARKER RD ~ °W °02~0 6.0 b 350SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY LAKE) °at LIBERTY LAKE RD E 29 08~~tt,,;.~`fi' 0 3 6° SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY LAKE at MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE ) ° E ° 8..01 _tt 370SPRAGUE AV (LIBERTY LAKE) oat MOLTER RD (LIBERTY LAKE) oW ~a 2159 ~c 3 80 SPRAGUE AV ( START ) at HAVANA ST E ;ol 7130 tt 390SPRAGUE AVE (END) °at HENRY RD °W ° 00733 'ziQ~~'L~r { E ° ~ti18~ tt 4 0° SPRAGUE RD ° at RR TR.ACKS ~ ° ~ z~ • ~ r ~ ~ . t - ' °~T . •.L-rYr ri Xi - ~ Aaaaaaaaaciaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaA pg 3/3~`~' - d.e 1 ~ °Pop Up°Single°Select row by pressing [Return] or--,entr-r)'row"" number [Esc]-eExit ° ~iaaaaaaeaaaaa~eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aaaaaaaad&&aaaaaaa~aadaaaaaaa~~ o; °Esc-Exit F1-Help Enter-Select Item AnyText-Searcr~text?-,jPgDn. -Next Page ° R~v: Ll . , b r'P ~ ;~"`~.&"~„s`',+y~. ~ a 'l. ' • _ . ~ iy+ fl • . . .t ' . r~C'~~ • . ~ • ' • . .J-- . . , ~ • 9:,1 • s~ ~ °f' f e, y:,: 3 .r- , S?j°f~y :Q ' r' Y7.' a . ~'t• ..~~~r.+•~ ~ • I y+ s . •y :~`a • k~~ ~;yY'~ r ~ - ~ • : h,~, ~ ~ ~aC p,. "c~. . ~ ~ • : z . ~ • v i ~~C'h=: • • i •t;•~3~, ~ ~ *:~''~Z•;~ ~ ' ~ ~ i'~ r t: ~ ` ~/'~K flt~• ~ . ~ s • J ' ~ . . .~~''~.;5. .•.~c t • ~ . •S~lt' . ti~~ ~ ~ ,°,~•'s'~:ti .;F_',~. ; ; , , . yit ~ ' %~,'r,a••~~ " ' ex _.i'sv's~~'~`.•~~ru~ -;s:../:c.:s. i~' ~ 'r Yi ~ • ~t' r~'. . `I*~ Y • . ~ r `2!' g . • - , a ~ ~ 'r, • ,~•A=~ ~ j `4 , , . ~ l ~rM• • ' C . l • , _ f • . t, • ~ p~ ~ y . . a, • ~ ~ ''~',•`z"~-'~_~e3~ ~ ~ . ~r `'v~.:~'~=•`7I~~ A&, r . r yt.~ . 1 b K July 6, 1994, at 1:15 p.m. .41 ~ t,~~'° ~ e~ 2 ' ; r f~ 7; ~ - a.,i~.. ~4 c1? Ia ~ ~7 Dahm Developmelll, lilli. ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ . rF , ~t~ „ ' ~ : Generally located at the southwest corner of the ~ntersection of Barker Road 5/ ~~~;~~~.~::~s~•Pg, . and 8th Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 N•, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 2~' ..~%~t~• f~ 1 t . ' ~ ~vir • f~ . . -y.,,t ~f} ~',11` • i~-~~`~ z ty OF.,:+, ,;y~. i,~, ~ . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Urban, and withiri*Pnority Sewer Service 0j ~ Axea (PSSA) ° • - . `~3 EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONTNG: Urbari`Resideiitia13:5;(UR - 3.5) ~ a>is' "N• ir g'~+.• • v., W:}' . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Preliminary Plat to'divideapp'roximately 39.14 acres into 101 lots for single family dwellings an d those uses al.lowed s in the existing Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR - 3.5) Zone :v PARCEL NUMBER: 55194.9025 . ~ . SITE SIZE: Approxiniately 39.14 acres . ~ ~ ~ . ~ APPLICANT: Dahm Development, Inc. - Orange Flag Bldg., Suite 215 104 S. Freya St. SPokane, WA 99202 (509) 535-5777 ^~yy`Y ~~t, ~;y : . ' k:' ' k ~ r~,~T ~ 1- • T' AGENT. Ramnz Associates, Inc. Lilac Flag Bldg., Suite 217 FT~ •,4'` . ~y~~r~ z< ;J'„w~ ~'~i ~,.~a' ~ 104 S. Freya St. ~ •e1 ~=r ~ ~y~:: . Spokane, WA 99202 p ~ (509) 534-8086 _'d f.r . L,•~ ,S~ ~;>t :R e G° ~`(uJ i ? • • • 3k {;,•f q ~ • i+r.~ y; ~ Lti~ kJ, < ASSIGNED PLA,NNER: Stacy Bjordahl r I ~ • ~R ~y'1 ~ ~'•r:ii ' ; ~3. ' '-fi ~ wtc-Turtle Creek-June 22, 1994 .'ea~0.~ p ,~i . . ` ~ sv, , . , ~ b.:v5 1 -IT t. 1td,k~' R• ~ j ~ ~ } • ~ ` .~7' ~ • ~ ~ 1 ~ya,, . r .La ,'e A~ }~j~ • q~FY ~ C~L ~ ~ G~ ~j~• - s. r ' ~ .~-~t$,t+~+ ~ ~ is. • ~ ~ • ~ • ~ ' ~ ' . ~ ° t''' ' ' ~ ~ Ai '~T~ ; • .I ' ~ ' l~`~i ~ Jj :1, l~r '1~' ~ _-0 ~ .Ir`•~ •l ~f ~~'"'~Y• - ~ ~ -~'t • '`~;~.j=4 ~i • . ~ s ' \ ~ ~ ~~y~.~ Ir %~F. ~ Y9l S P O K A N E C O;k_. U N'?' ''~7 J ~~ti PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D."HUBBARD, DIRECTOR r. • a7' P'~' ~ ~ MEMORANDUM y Y~ ~ t r~r~`~•`~~t}~T ~ `q ei• ~ ~~~V. _ ~ TO: Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Erigineering IV" V:i ' ' u.° % Y~ ' ~ .rt ~i•J Brenda Sims, Storm Water Utility 0.~ Red, Spokane County Utilides Department, Ji.m Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health Disfrict' _F' J:`~t~ ~ Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Greg ' . ~ r Figg Department of Transportation ~ Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authoriry_ ` ~ ~r ~ ~ • r: ` ~ A ~ ~ io !i'7 •S 1 d.. Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board ~L•„ v_ ti~~~'"~;.-~ Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Coiuicil : ~ ' • ` • ~ ~r Central Valley School District No. 356 fj+ 4 •y ~ Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 k Fire Protection District No. 1 ~ ~'i~'~- F~ p~~, `r'• '~i' Dennis Beich - Department of Ecology . Corps of Engineers l•K• • J'r ` * + ~ , fi" • ~ 4- 9 ~ > ~ • ' n '+'1 ~-'`~~'o t ~ • ~ . FROM: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner < DATE: June 22, 1994 M~ •~~y , RE: Preli.minary Plat of Turtle Creek with existing Urban Residential - 3.5 (LJR - 3.5) Zone ~ ~ APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING,~ JULY 6L1.994 AT 1:15 P.M. _C01UNTY PLANNINC CONFERENf'E RnC)M~ 2ND FLnOR • a ` i ' Please review the above application and use the attached AppLICATiON ACCF.n'1'ANCENNIX.; ~ • DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Deparbment "X'' h{~ encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have,>~.een invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the =~~'t~ ~ •,a attached form to Stacy B jordahl for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ~ ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and";~ included in the Planning DePartment file so bring xhrqg coPies to the meeting). Thanks 1, _ ; ~ :;,c►, ~r,~ for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please cNontact ; t'ft Tr >_.Stacy B jordahl of the Planning Department at 456-2205. ~~p r~~~''~; . ~•j~ ,Sn,. . a ,s A • , ; `d ~ : 4 c: Dahm Development, Inc., Orange Flag Bldg., Ste 215, 104 S. Freya St., Spokane,`~~G; ;~s~~•$es` . WA 99202 . ~:e-~ Inland Pacif'ic Engineering, 707 W. 7th Ave., Ste 200, Spokane, WA 99204 •°;J`~,~~~;'. .t .`~yt;~'~=.~;=-"3 "rt' ; Attachments. ' Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, ~ Pro'ect Design, Site Plan wtc-Turtle Creek-June 22, 1994 WFST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 ~(509) 456*2205 ' ' r~~"'~,. ~'F`'~}=~ ~ . ~ _.;;~~~~i~i e .'f`°`~~~f ~ i;~ • ~ 1' ,o. . ~ 4R ' • . ~-`~`,=p . s • . : t c~ • _ m. . _ ` - ' •~.~R1~~'~$S ".mn-,~'r..~t:.f,-i.n:?o::. . ! ~Ci;:+t ~ ,•~r ~ dd#~~'•e~,: + .}~'f ~,;Iv y , ► ~ ~ ~ 6~~~~~' t~ , a' it~Y~+ L, . ( ••:.~k'} I?f): ,~c E< < , . A , j,%a~ ~ v r . . 4 i~?~~ - • • ~ ^ . . { • _ . - . . S . ~ ,•4T~~~%'~j'f.' ' • ;Y ~~i i~ ~ • + ~ ~ ; N.~ 6r • C'j~h~. ~1~~ , ~r.v~'' ~r. . d r ' `1 i'•~r` ~~y~t'~i1~'~ A! , ~~~3,Fr ,M ~ ~ ~s ' ~K~~;,~ ~ C ! t~,\ . `a h •yy A . ,'S-,r ,9! V ~ £:a~~ . 2 n". f ~i ~ k ~ • ,A~. 71M ~ • 4~pl~~!'~y. 1 6~~ . .i FR t ? ~.4 • • 7 ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ . . . . 'C~. ~ i~'' ~ • . , 'r'~ c ~~W` f : 7~ r~t' ~S{* y~ S ~ -44j 1,~ ~ • , •~t. I x ~~~/:f~~t~'~.•y„ ' •y ~~~"v►f,d'~~~,C' , ~ ••t ~q~3--*ym~7~~, ~ ~ 'YY~~;~~ .n~ r'L a, d i %os, . 1 + : . ~ t.~F~r~.y•:,'l:;t* A. .x'~~ ~l~~ l~, r• {~y , t -~t ~ ~:f ~yh~l ~~ti ~4~~ti CF- c,; ~'CKi4:',~.f•~'`~' _ ~ Y * ~ ~ [ ' ~ y,? =►,T. ~ ' ~ ~1 ~ t ~ . ~ ~ . •^t ~r• •'C'.i. a~' • 'S-l r k TURTLE-CREEK PRELIMINARY 'oPL~~~ ~ ~ , ~ -~"i~ ` ~y~fm'~~ : ~ SYni~v ~ , - { r ~iy~~t ~ R ~'g~ T•; • ~ R~'~' .~J • Aq';~ ,t~~.:'+ ' '~•,`~T~.~a'~"~".~ ~ . •r j. a' ~M1 , V' ` s • ~'~,t~: ' ; ~ , ' • ' . t~, J• i • ~ ~ , f . . ~ ' o. :I ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE... SPaKAI~TE . SECTION 11.10.230' a t "i` , y~~ rt ] RAMM ASSOCIATES, INC. Lilac Flag Building, Suite 217 104 South Freya Street ~ i t~'• ;i~~~~a~.~' ~ ft Spokane, Washington 99202 ~ ~:,.f t~~~~~,{!~, ' K~ •T(~~Y''y^ ,~p;%~~ ~ ' ? J~"t "~~4Y 4~u i - - _ ' - - t~ t.~~}'' ~r^ 'ti~.a ' <:.~v, .79 • ~ s .ya .ra ~y- ; .~~',~.~~yr~"s JUNE 1994 '•\~5us~ I- ~.C~,~N;yt~ ~ y'#:,,; , • ~.4w`' d... i ~ ,tlr-c: , • '~r A~ as f' ' ~ f ~ . . • c, e.~~o~~'^7i ~f ° ; ~ " ; ~.$t't~'~i~,.~'c"~ ~ ~ arj• • r ~ ~ ~ ~ , . s ' .P¢i c a ~y ~~''e• ' • y '~Np{ ;f• yr~` '~t1 4 t~ 7~ t rt ~ . . ..n { r r '.7'~ t -1~ ~ r`'~.:r ) i'~"'~j~: • ~ ~..`b~. ~ ?.~~;_.ru::••.~:..~. ~ 't~. N~ri a~fi {,:l.~: . y. , 4 ~ J• , ` , • ' l ^ ,.~ry'~; I f ~ ~e ~ ,t',..'!>~~1~'-,~ SPOK1lNE Et(YIRdKKENTIIL ORDIMJIKCE ' i 'S7~ •i~~^• ^ ; rL•, ~ ~:-~,":y3~~"',~` ,d:.•~`~,;t (MAC 197-11-960) Settion 11.10.230(1) " ' ~ y-'"~-. ~•1it. `L~y~f' . 'yti~•..~ K . ~y - •~r ~~%~r Envlrorxaental Checklist t s, ' ~ , . ~ Q ~ File No ~ iCJ ` ;=e~°~• LL Purpose of Checic11st: ' i - ;,~r. ~ • ~,~r `a• ~t;~;,w};3-3a yt,~;y'~~i~ The State Envirornental Policy Act (S£PA) chapter 43.21C RC1t, reQuires all goverrmntnl agencles to consider the envirormental`;ainpacisof, a propo5al,.~~P+'~~ • before making Aecisions. An Environsental lmpact Statertent (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significa i~adverse~~~`tmpacts,,on,t~;;: the quality of the envirom~ent. The purpose of tMs checkllst 1s to provide information tohelp you and the agency identify:-impacti frora youc,"~y.~~~A: propozal (and to reduce or avoid impacts froa the proposal, if it can De done) and to helpK}~fhe, agency decide whether an EIS is req'u`ired. instructions for Applicants: ~ , ' il^ t.~j~~ : , "~~t s f,~: f; ; i j1. S`~'-~ .ti . .N~~".'•.G . This environaental checiclist asks you to Cestribe soae basic information about your proposal~,;Goverrwoental agencles use this checkli,st.to Eet,n,ne=~~~'~~;-• rhether the environaental inpacts of your proposal are slgniflcant, requiring preparatlon a~f,;an EIS~.~Answer the questions briefly,'witA the nios~~~~-•,h' ~t. procise fnforaiation knwn. or give the best description you can. • ~ "t` . br •Q~`~., ; ~ t'. , . ,~ya, ~s . a_: You rsust answer each q~stlon accurately and carefully, to the best of your kna+ledge.~'r'In,~oosi~ca~'ess you should be nble to answer the.questio s R.,, a , frne your own observations or proSect plans withaut the need to hire experts. If you really d~.not kr~w the artsrer, or if a questfon;;dces;not pP~ply~ • . ' to your proposal. xrite •do not know' or 'does not appiy.' Coa~plete answers to the questions~~iy~,~q~y ma av i~ unnecessarY delaYs'later. ''''~r . , Some Questions ask about governwental regulattons, such as zoning. shoreline. and •landaiark des~{;.~ iyna~,l.?~7 o" ns. tA~s i~ ~+e~ these uestlons if ou ca Y ou have proble~s, the governmental a9ertcies can assist you. :,.c Q • y aiv . ~ ` . ~G~ ,2'p"'!ry ~ r~ ~k`~~'y ~ "~~ec'•'„'i; + r,- • The checklist questions aPD1y to all Parts of Yavr proPosal, even if You plan to do thero over•a erlod of time or on different Parcels of "larfd: a;;-, t}:"•,,,~'~ Attach any additional inforaiation that rill describe your proposal or its environnente1 effects;; dhe~ agenty,~M1Eto which you submlt this checklist may~`,, ask you to explain rour ansvers or provide additlonal lnfonnation reasonably related to deterrainiqg ,i f¢th e'~nay be significant adverse; impact. ~'~'r,,~, ~ ° • ♦ 1.~ ~ ~ .a. ~r t~ , : . r:t7~ . ~ a' . Use of checklist for nonprojett proposals: . ;:;,:t~ w~• f~-:~i: y" . ' 3,~`,• Caplete this thecicllst for nonproject proposals. even though questions rnay be ansvcred •does~'~iit•,~aDp ,;''~~h' 3"~.y ~ .•r i~ ' IN IIODiTION, cauplete the SUFPLEIIENTAI SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part 0). J: ; 4A~~ . : ,~~t'~,~-y ~ •st: ~ F ~ , ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~rr.-,; r', ' ~ ~ .4 i ~ For nonproject acttons, the references in the checkllst to tne wrds .project.. .aP911cant..;ent1.,DropU1i'o~r;s9te' should be read as ,.proposal,,; . ~ ~ .~,y~ c~ ~ proposer.. and 'affected geographic area.' respectlvely. ;~~k A s~K~tl; r • ' , ~ ' a r.. ,f~`,~y!''6 ~ i~~ ~ ~ .y = '~f';, ` :;,ti n ~ A. BACKGROlJMO Y. ~ ~,~~t, t; ~ . f • . 1. 4ame of proposed project, if applitable: Preliminarv Plat Of Turt~s;~~~~Jt~~~'~~,`,~~ . . ar~-~lk.7P'1"4 iA ~ ' w~4 1~~ 1 eNe vl . . ~~i,. ~,.,rFy•, , . , 1 N i 21 . . s an'~ 4:a-'~t+~ ~r n . i~ . " •,Si: ; .r:;k~ 2. Nar of Applicant: . ~ y ~ahm Develonment ~ Inc * ~~.4~'. q'~„, • •a 3. Address •nd phone nurnber of appllCant or contact person: R1C~1 ~ITl1, C/O Dahm'~Develoment, T11C. Orange Flag Bldg., Suite,21_5, 104 S. Freya St., Spokane, WA 992U2 Phone: (509) 535-5777 Y: • June 1994 t. Oate checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: SpOkaIle County Planninq Department . . ~a 6. Proposed t1Ain9 or schedule ( inc luding phasing, if appllcable):Thgd I?lAt Will 1 i kPl y}~e develoned lIl ' three phases over a period of several years dependinq on market demand. The three phases are shown on the preliminary plat. . .x • , , . 7. a. Oo you hare any plans for future additions, expansion, or further acttvity releted to or comected rith this proposal? (f yes. eiiplain. . No - - . r N... E't.•.Y S.~ b. Do you o+m or have options on land nearDy or adfacent to tMs proposal? If yes. explaln. ,••,+'^c ,iy',. . Dahm Develoxxnent. Inc. owns other acreaae near Charman and Steen Roads; approximately one mile to the southwest of the site. ~,~R ,~'~tie i4)~~ . ~1'-~~;"~?'. ~ ~ry~~ Yt? 3~~i ' • 8. List any environmental infornation you knor about that has been prepartd, or wt ll be prepareG, directly related to this proposal. R,'. ~~rr. ; None. S fiv'~i , {r. r.,~tiM,~~'• . • ' : r~ 9i . • r • ^ r ~:4~: T~ ~ • Tr . • ti.;:, . ' ` • ' _ ve,~ . 1t~~~ . . . A. n~ n ~s' RlY.Z/1/~ r..41 . . . ' • j ' ~ Y,r{` ~ ~ ~ • . , ~ • ? , r3i 'l 7I:~~~~' . • - . yi'a.,.~j~lY`~~ . . , I 1 • ~ r , •~r a 4 ~.t { i aa , yh; _G~ v ;~°~.,.•:~~i~ i, s+,' :~;.z ~,ti~-`1.t-' • ~ ~1~~,1':!~'ra,/~ t.'k~ f'ir~ (±!l.k4W,~:i.k:~taic~)s..~.~J.w1~..1.\~:.. v:y'l'r.:'~.:.~• .L :e. 1 ~f:,~t: y1 •;f; 'ti. . ; S~{.1i* ~~J~ ~r r ~~~''-Fi~' f~(-`'`E..~♦ ' 9Pf7l.A+'JL ENVIRON!{ENLAL ORDIPAACE (veC 191-1,1-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ~'t," ' ' ~ : '~~E~ ~t~~' ~n . •c-~j~^t~ l ~~w A~,~Ih A. M(XG80M (contiaued ) 9. po taw vhether a lications are ,••ti, .s:• -S: rt vy~p y~ ' , erplain. ptO'd1a$ for goveraaentel approvals of other proposale directly affeccing the property covd' ~ rd ti~bp ,yurr~;?,,',h+' roposal . If yea None. • ~ • 'A: r- .yI z -~Q LT n r3 _dY Y. yJ4 ~~K~.~Lt~i °t ::ti ; . . Q~'~''., €r. ~i•a;: ~9•ry`^, y ~~'y';.+~1 ~o w-.~ .\3~'~. tV~h . ~ ~.`.F. ~•i~ . . 1 j:;~~-ri , y~ ^,,,~~,,~p~~:~Li,;• ) . . 10. Liec an p Po ~j r~~~, y governmot approvala or peraits tha[ vill be needed for your ro sal, if 1¢iowa' Preliminary and final -•rmi plat approval, and necessary.pe ts for water, sewe'r r.: roads draina e and bu z~s~ ► a . ildinqs. " , ,;r~1~,y~' T • 4L ai;~•,~-1'y. ' Y ~~iY'-r:. •w....~, , • ;;I~ • ' .-,y .~+r:. ~w~v.Y, ' ' • ~ ~ ^ s I a~ze` y','~J~ 11. Give a brief, complece descrlptlon ot your proposal, ineluding the yroyosed uses and the, si:e ot che.:project end ■lte. -here erel Eevera7Y;° questioas Lter 1n chis ehecklist that ask rou co describe certa n aapeccs o ywr proposal. You do' o,c' ped to rep c hoae s on'thls~Ipage. mhP r~rnmR~ q; +-A iS nnroximate~v 39 _ 1~ acres.~ A preiinary p~a ofy ~cs s ~l: A..4 ~y'~~'*• • % < 1F?-fami 1 v rPsi dPnf-i a 1 10 s is nrnt~ A.wi fih i n thc~ "P.yiSt1. cr jJR-3 i5 zone. . YT ApDro xi matPl ~ 6.73 a_r _s of o~ soace are provided, .Public4~and private roac~s will ~1~r',~~' ~fk; Drovide site access and public sewer and water will ,.be=u ro;~ded~to all lots ~ • '3^ v':•-c~i,~}~', i ? y ~~t• , •.~."atS:~ ~ r`~~' ; ~ F a' e ,c a,y.-•~+ 'T ~t. ~`~~•y.. ,K' ~W4 .4~n 1:. Loution of the proposal. CSvs tufficlent lnfocmation far a peraon to unders[and the pneis~ .•LoG~~~i•'ofr: y'~ur; proposcd proSect, includinr a e[reet addrese, lf any, and sectlon, toviuhly anQ nnge, 1f Icnovn. It s'pcoposal vov~d rartgj! iof eiea, provtde the range or • boundariee of the eite(@). Provlde a legal description. •1te pLan, riciniry map, and'topoQra~i1"f•'reaionsbly.evallable. Vhile you •hould aubnit any pLoi requlreE by the agency, 7w are not required to duplicate o~ • or ~eeii'leQ?P ~bmitted vlih eny pecmic applicacion •;"«,,'•,w; reLted to thio checklist. ~ e~C 1CcC^~tP ll"1 t~'1P N ~ Qfa ~~"R'A"•'(7f''SPC`t'1C~1'lt ..r ~„•;`:y: ,19~--r ' r `-i.The 'site is t `rianaular ' • i n share anc3 is 1 ocated at the sou hwPst_ corper Qf B~s e"r oad and ,8th Avenue, north of Saltese Creek. t' • , 17. Doee the pcopoeed action lie vithin the Aqulfer Seroltive Area (ASA)? 'Ae General Sever Service Area' :he Priori[y Sever Service Area' The " City of Spokane? (See: Spolcane County's ASA OverLy Zorte Atla• Eor bour+daries). 41 ~ - vPs, GSSA - y .zi, P53A - ves _ • • , . . •.~a , -o ee coePt.~n eY nPrt.tuxr e. ntvisoxMEIr-.wi. eLaCMtrs r . Eveluatlon For 1 1. EAP'tl Agency Uae Only • a. General deecription ot the sice (clrcle oae): flat rolling. hi12y, st x p slopes, oountainous, ochet: The site is primarily flat on the north, with sloping . . ~ areas south toward Saltese Creek. b. 'fiac la the •teepest slope on the •ite (approxlmate-percert[ slope)'. On-site slopes rancre from approximately 0 to 35 percent, . . : C. gtDecDl t ~ '~8~ yye• of aoila are found on the sice (for esample, clay, eand, gravel, peat, ouck). If you knov the claseiflcation of agrlcultural soiL, •pecify Lheo and note anq prioe farsland. N, See attached. • • f ~ iC 'l~ ' • ~ .t d- Are there surface indicacionn or hiscory of unscsble solle in the Lmmediate vicinity! If so, ~ 'Pj deacribe. . ' t;: , r .s . . No . ~ ~ , , ~ ' rr3 _ , . s~o.t .✓~~r~' s;~: ` ~ ' • ~v :.t':r ~A RM r Z ~ ' y, ~ : +s ~ ^ Y, ? 4' ~lY•~ ~ ,~~r~'/~_T1 ~ ~~.I,~ ~ ~ 4~'•~.~' t ,S i5r, ' r ' • ~ `Q~ .s''~'., ~ ~u .~si_SLL. - r:f '1 . . •ae _ . . - ,k e , . : f ~ - • •4 • a _ . ;;y; •.r-!'v: ~ • . ~ • • ~ j { ~ ~ PT f L ~ , 1 , ~ J~. l' fe " .~`,••T. ~ $POK1lNE EMYIROPU{ENTAI ORDINIIHCE (WAC 191-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ~ • , •'',"\~'.7 .;.~.T; , c~. , ~ ' 1 r,•. ^ a f,S'~" .'3 8. ENYIROMiENTAL ELEIIENTS(cantinued) ;ti~ a~~~`•Y ~t•~~ ~ , ,a;, ~ u, ~iL?~ • Ji n~ EvaluatlonJFo~,~`rt'.`~'•• r `4•-.. t . `r s-'. a, Agency Use" Onj y._4,11 ' ;F !i e, Describe the purpose. type. and approximate quantlties of any filling or groding proposed. ~•y ..D~' S~ -r~ -0 h. Indicate source of fill. ` - ~r~• • • : attached ~;~~~h . :y'~ g:'. .~i•' , "r ~ s7• Y'.~ ~ ' ' Y , :49; ?~+'~'a3 ,,s,- ,r. . .r. id~ • ; if. Could erosion oaur as a result of clearing, constructton. or use? If so, generally descrtbe. l,~s.~,. ~h,~. f._,.s-;~ SEP_ Itt1Gh2d. !~'t`~Y ~,'t ' 1~t' ,:*a•''' . 61~L` ~y~•`..K~.,'~[;'ai •y,.~~J'~.i > k, _.y, +~,i' .1y`• ~s t~~~ . . •r ~c~ ~$'i . ~~t r,~k° • t' 1'••.. X ~t' . F~; ~,rr' . `t'S ' " c°-E'• ~-'"f=E!-., 1Y~~'y g. About wbat percent of the site rill be covereC rtth impervlous surfaces after pro3ect°co(nstruc- tion (for example. asphalt or bufldings)? ApprQximatPly 18 iaercent Qf the total area is estimated P to be oovered by impervious surfaces followinq final , "t' build-out of the site. r ~i.1„ ~yt ~ •9 r i ; •n-'j • ~ i?; ';;'^~-y h. Proposed measures to reduce or control eroston. or other impacts to the eirth. 1f any: 41 y~% ~,t> r~~•~4~'; v`• r F• . a✓..± . ~ 'Cr "d 'k ~ ~ . SeP a a _hed _ 41~ ' ~ "iC` t, .~.tl' •4 , •l~ `•.~~ipa'; : . ;x,= • _ t cr~ ,+t,~~ `¢~~;`:f+- ~ • -:-•~:a ~ V'. ~a xi'- a~.~ ~{t 6Y y ~~4 • va~~f~";' f ~`faet' • " :i . • - . ` 2. A I R i . , . a. Ilhet type of emissions to the air would resuit fram the proposal (1.e.. dust, autanobile`.,odorsa~ • j- industrial, wooG smnke) during constructlon and when the project 1s coapleted? (f any,'~ x;~ -'~7~;._<~',,"+•';•• , s;~ 9 ' ° enerallY describe and 91ve approximate Quantites if known. •~N;f , w•~' _ See attached . , .,L,~` _ . , b. Are there eny off-site sourtes of emissions or odor that nay affect your proposal? If so. '6 ;y generaliy descrlbe. - NU,, ~_cty3 b , ~ ,a ~:1' r~ ~p~ • ' r t ^ Fw ..•i c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emtsstons or other taipacts to a1r. 1f any: a y.r~ ` t S afit-achec3 . . r„ . . , . ' . • 3. WATER • • a. Surface: " • (1) Is there any surface vater boCy on or in the iweElate vicinity of the site Including year- • round and seasonal streams, saltrater. lakes, ponds, retlands)? If yes. describe type and - ~ ~Iprovide nacnes. If appropriate, state wfiat stream or river 1t flows into. Ti.,; ~;L~ Selp a a .he~l f ~ . ; f~..~• , ~ ~ . • '..~,a~ , (2) Will the ro ect rr uire any work over, in, or adjncent to (within 100 feet) Lhe described `"i'~ • waters? If yes, please describeand attach available plans. ~'"'-1~r'r• ~ See attached * tf • f - ~R • w:'- . ~ ~ ~ ~nt :"s 3 f'• " y~+~,,' ffft . ~ i ~ .i;5~.~',^~,:.~ ~P • `~,~~ti'~ .7l:c~.j~i .r ~ w L ~ : • :P,~,'1~-,' E. l. >yt.v' fi e ~ '•'.`T''- ~•a"C~ a . , ;7 ~ ~ ,,~'p~ i 't • a . .~r.I'- d'V . ?ws~ .•l~ ':~~:1~ ij~::Qa.~ _ nwr~.^'.v«':~.3_`i, ti .rR I ~ • • . ?~,tiSt,a'f,-t~ 4'` ~~i ' ;.ii'S';l! 'a ~ ' ~ ..a 7_i•i ':;~y,, dt Y'~~t: ~ / ,wp~`•A V~" 1ti ~ SPOtAKE LNOIROZQMN2AL OHDIHANCE , . C ~ ark ~slz,.y-,, `:i~~t'•i'q: ; (57AC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) rt . - ~ ^ ; ; • y D. EHVIRONlENTAL EL~17:'S (continued ) - • , ~p`' ,~•Yi~,` e Evaluati8 21'-':. ':vJ:}~ Agency Uae"Only-v 1$ _:e ti . ' (1) Estlnace the anwnt of flll and dredge ma[erial Chat vouid De plated in or removed Eson the , c • ' yy •y eurface water or vetLndo and indiute the area of the •ite that vould De affeceed. Iadicate t 4` ~~s Q'~ ' : *t~l the source of [111 rterlal• ' ~ ~'t~• ~~.3''~ti3 None v; : : : ~ `~•.~•r.~ ~ + ~U'-f~~-~ . y"'~}~,%~•~•`%" ' i ~ ~~-3~` .G'~µ' • ~ 2~ ~ l` n !r3 t,' 't «4ZK~9' I ti f -ay v.' a ! ~~,..y"t,~C~ .{-i ` •.C~;~'.~~,~~~i ,;.a '1. w. .Ii~-,~'` . Y~' f :r. 1 • ' .•t:.;+ari:~~?; (4) t7111 the proposal requlre •urtue water vichdrawals or diveTslons? Ciw a general desciip- ( •r,•'``~~~e tion, purpose, and apptoslaate Qusn[1[Ses, if knwn. :?-7~ ~ • ~ ~~i ~ _ ~ r, . 6; ; ~ v'' .~`~%•g. No. ~.,s.~.P. . ~'sif j `rA 1, . ~ ~ • (S) Does the proposal Ile vithia a 100-yesr flood plain2 If so, oote louilon oe the •1te plan, ` ~ ,'~~:t•a~,''"'~ A( _$Pp at-tar-h~ . • 13 ~t ,t - ''~~e J:' J ~ 1 Z ~ :t~•~.~ Cly;( •i r K i t.w '„~;L'• {y{s' . . u'` ~ ol`~~,~ ~ }}~;in (5) Doe• the proposal involve an7 d1scharIIes of vute aater1aL to wrfaee vaterst If wa describe the type of vaste and aaticipated volum ol discharge. Ki., t• ~Ifk~ ♦ 3 - ' , ~ ik Y1 i1~C,~' ~ ~N • °'~a ~ ' _,N ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ . - VL _ ~ l+~, si'~y~r3~1,-« .a,1a r.. • }#'..i • ~.l f' y~ • .1 ~;~t.` t r~ t~: - ai;:~; • . .pr. 7•-0• 't~ ~Y:~~.~;~~.~,~'+' . r.?-~,,,' • • ' D. Cround : (1) viil graundvater be vithdravn, or vill water be discharged to groundwcer' Cive geaeral;'~~ description, purpose. •nd approxinate Quantitles. if lmovn. N~ wat _r for this aevel or~mPnt wi 11 _ nrovi_c~ed by ' _ _ " Uf'• thP Consolidated Water District. . {n; ,r (2) Deseribe vaste aaterial that vlll be dischacgad ioto the ground trom •eptic tank• or ocher -.r,' unitacy vaate trutaant facility. DescrlDe CIfe tEMTal site oi the drystem, the number of houeee to be •erved (if appllcaDle) or the number of psrsons the ffysces(s) are ex"eted to - serve. 'N9 . ~ NcnP - C?n-si tP s wPr s rvic w' 1 conn c into the .t , _Spokane County sewer system _ «j . > (1) Describe •ny s7steas. other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary vute, instelled fot the purpose of discharging fluid• belov the grouod susface (includes •ystea• such as those for the disposal of storm water or draloage fram floor drains). Deseribe the type of ' , ~qsteo, the aeount of aaterial to be dlsyosed ot tbtough tAe s7rstes and ihe qpe• of maeerials - likely to De disposed of (intluding aaterials vhieh say entes the r7stm loadwrtently thrwgh spills or •s a reault of fireflghtina aetlvities). " . • .;~Y . .y (4) Vill any chmlcals (especially organle solvents or petroleua fuels) be stoted in above- •~s3S~.;- grouad or LLIIdElgT011IId •torage csniu? If so, v6ac t7Pes aod quanticies of aatnrlals vill be ~ • s[ored? t.e . ' / - f~ • ' v ` w~~ J ~ 4 ' 4,4,`•,.. y,`' , • ~ 7y~ ~ - • • y; ;,.~,.9 ~ ~ • 8. ~►i_'~. ~"f a~ ~~la - 7t $ .e fr, ,:d~ ' • `'i - r . S; `C} ,lx ~ ~ i~ ►1,k' _i , f t r .j`f ` y •'S'iy. " • t' •~~.p,~ ~g•\ `44', • Y '~ti%L'a:'Ls~h .;.•.'.c` ..t~ '1.':~.'''r_~... •i.:+-'•ni , • • :i't ~ ' ''~~~~F~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ a ~ • j' • - t ~5+ 1~~~ c I t'4, ' SPOT.ANL EJPIBOMSLNTJL 08DIAATiCY Y ' ~Y~r„ti`'F-~'~1'~s'$i•• (vAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ~ , ' ~~,ti ~ . • • ~a .g~`,:,: _'r;..tir,r;' °t' B. ERVIRO?dKEMAI. EI.?2CN:5 (eontinued) ~u « f~` .;~r.. Evslwtioa'' Poi = Ageney Uoe~Onlq p,.: ,~,-7,.. (S) uhat procective measuree vill De taken [o insure thac laalu aT apllla of any chemieala ~,A~_ ~;w'' ~cored or ueed on eite vill not De allovcd to percolate to groundvster (thl• ineludes nensuree • . ;33•,' co keep chenicals wc of dlsposal eysteas described in 3b(2) aod 3b(3)? N/A 'r~t ,ci•' ~S ; ~ ~ ~i t t - ~~t~;~.2 • ~ V~45 >-y ~,L~,1 r r t1~,'~ f~~yY~' ~ t : _ : ' • ~:z U°PV; c. Vater Runoff (iacluding stora vater): T•, . ' . . r7~'Zt~ - (1) Desczibe the source of czmoff (iccluding ston vater) and me[:wd of tollaetion and disposal . , ~ • . , ,.,.:i~;~,~?::; if aay (include Quantities, if knovn). Yhere vill chi• vater flov? W111 this vater flov Snto ' • d ~ s' ' other vatere? If so, describe. ~'r•~~~ ;a'~`; _ answer to 3. b;ll . p,-s~sal of cx~l lected storm ,y water will be- throucrh infiltration into the soil from ~F ~ _ ~ _drainaae swales andPossiblv drvwells * (2) :lill any cheaicals be •tored. Aandlyd or wed on the sice in a loucion vhere a spill or • aa.''.,.•' 'v~ IeaY, vill drain to •urfaee or groundwater oc to a storn wter dlspo"l systm d1scRaraing to 7~,a ; eurfece or groundwcert .P s~y,' •~'p, ' .~j.~t:, No. ~r ~k kr , , • ati Could vaste titerlal• enter ground or surtact watersi If so, generally deacriDe. ~:i~.. ~'~'P ; ~•.,.r. f • y',t No _ -.;`ti ~ ry, ~ j^,F~~•, . -•r^ % ; ' . ,;~~,`4.¢,~A~~~`~`• . . ~~y~j.f~,.<<~A . • a, : • ' _ h;: • . , ' :r~: d. Proposed measures [o reduce or eontrol •urface, ground, aad runoff vater inpacts, tf aoy (Sf . t the proposed action lie• vithin the Aquifer Sensitive Aru be aspecijLlly eleac on explaoationm r rel.atiog to [acilities coocernina Sectlons 1D(4), )b(S). •nd 3c(2) oi this cMckliot): ` See answer to 3. b_ 3,. ~ F•~ ~••t , " ~ '.r . , ' F(•` ~,!'A 4. Pl.A.V'[S e. rheck or circle type of vegetation tound oo the •lie: . ' declduous tree: alder, vaple, •spen, other. • t: • ~ . : evergreee tree: fir, eedar, pine, other. x sfltLbs. ~ M X grase. . • pucure. ~ • . y x crop ot s=.in. (alfalfa and beans ) ~ vet soil pLota, cattall, buctereup, bullrwh. skualc eaEbaae, other. ' N[er plants: rater lilly. eelgrams. ailfoil, other. 'X_ oLher types of vegetatlon. Wildflowers ~ ' ~ ~ . b. Vhec kind and uount of vegetation v111 be rmoved or altesed? 1 '1 1 l tV al'ld rnad . ' ~ t_ • y • . ~ cx~nstnicti on, as well as homesite _DreDarations r will - reauire the removal of some crrasses and acrricultural crops. c. Liot thzmtened or eadangered species Imovn to be on or oear the site. 4p !y)e ~ ~ ~ None T . ~ . d. Propased landseapiog, e o native pLnC•a or~Q t r ure tp 1reserye or nhaace vs tati~s~ ' ' a`~ on che •iCe, if any: lIZC~l.Vll,llldl ~oTu~h11~1 ~.JC l~I1C~SCd Wll.il ' indiaenous nlants as soon as construction is complete. Native vegetation consistinC1 of 9rasses• wildflowersr anc~ _t ~n~, r~'•<"''`~ ~ ';~H ; ;,~•~•':r~~ shrubs (wild rose) along Saltese Creek will be retained . . • . } , • ~ ~y~ WI l~.lll.n the open space areas. 5 ( E~ , yiJ '~r• 3• ~l•.• 9;N, ~ t r ~ ~ J1'~ i _~.t.(:T-t ~~uy 'at . ! ~ v~`~;'^;~Or~':~'.~"~.►~,^~ s*?G.~'t,i', ~Y'~:~~ ~~f`X~-`t ~`{'~.''kr o_ .y , • ~ } `i ' 4:. . i 'tr',i. ~S v ri!~ ~n'. ~~.,a ~ .p• . _ ~'~t tl 1~•rx-ki-~~!~.~...r1~R~•~V„n:i:..~~. ..~~~,•.:.~~,~{~..L._fL:♦ .~i. iY'~!•T';- . ~ 0 ; . b ~r,-;.`• ~;~u, ~ .t r , . • ,~;,7. i-,ul ? r,', t ' ' I - ' •S 4•'•7'~:~,t; ~i„u ~,•l:~i~~;J'~i' ' ~ 7 ~'(~~~':i'~2+ SPOKAf(E ENVIRQRMfKTAL ORDINANCE - n..' (WAC 197-11•960) Section 11.10.230(1) ' - ~,ff ~~e~ '`w~''" . %°7:.; .'~.3 B. ENVIROFMENTAL ELETIEMT'S (continued) 1 Evaluation',for-•'r Agency Use Only~? 5. ANIMALS 1~ ~ , .?~a y. w. ~ ` ' ~ ? ~Y' °r • A. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or nc.ar the slte or are knwn to be on w~,^j"-~-° tk d~'+ or near the s1te: $Dar Z'OWS , robins hawks, aT1d ~ '?'-~~~'~'4~ N+,Q;~•;. _1:,~ other comdnon biM species. birds: hawk, heron, eagle, son9birds. other: A4 a4, ,~;a:, ° p~ ,a{~ • ~+f - " •k`~~~fth. - mamnals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: Rabbitsf voles+ and mice• fish: bnss, salnon, trout, herrin9, shellftsh, other: None :4`~~°`;^:{~.~}. , ~ • other: None. .~,r ~ 4 • ~ .i: ,L - - ;`,1,~, ~ b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None, . : _4-4 - ,"F - .i - . f . +~i • • , s.r,;..: ' • 5,'x , ~ ^Y i+ . S, ' ,.4 ~•wR x - C. is the site part of a nigration route? If so, exAlain. ' No_ ' , . . : ~ . ~;r,:;.,.,~., ` 4 Alf- d. Proposed neasures to preserve or enhance rildlife. tf any: Each lot wi 11 be landscaPed and open space areas will retain their native , veqetation. The introduction of a variety of trees and , . . shrubs will enhance habitat for birds and small animals. . ~a: . ~ . ' ' 1:'i • •li• . 5. ENERGY ANO NATURAL RESOURCES a. uhat kinds of energy (electric. natural gas. wood stove. solar) vill be used to aKet the.t, 'c•' • `'~_'fyys the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be uzed for heating. rnanufac- , 4k:i . _ . ;i i, `s • turing. ett. . • . :yrS~- "'•t' 1<c. }rfi,~'~ Washinaton Water Power will nrovide electricity and . ' ' 1 nafiura]_gas for he residential develourentt ' , . ~'Y b. Would your project affect the potential use of salar energy by eQiacent properties? ]f So. :t~ FS generally Cescribe. : • l~'~ ; P~ ~ No. The heiaht of the sinale-family units will be t-vnir.all~~ twQ stori eS _ ~2'i ' j Srf- Y • • ~ .C ~V:. yS, d 9 a• ~ , c. What kinds of energy tonservation features are included tn the plans of this proposal? List '.'`1: • other proposed neasures to reduce or control energy tmpacts, tf any: The _hi crh Uual ; ty homes of this_.development _w.ill_.kie g .L • built in an enerqy efficient manner, using quality cog~.struction materials that oromote enerqv conservation, . ~ e TV ENVIRONHENTAL HEALTH ~ a a. Are there any envirorx.ental health hazards, includtng exposure to toxic cheioitals, risk of fire • > and explosion, spill. or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. ~a ' Nn.. ! ki , a f • ,a ~ : ' ' • . ;~E p g '-b~, ,r.~~ • ~'j~t~~;. st : r• ~,~1 C~r ~ G • ~r . . b- ~ ~ ,I• (i) Describe special energency servlces that mlght be required. Eme_rqenrv services that would be reauired include ' nol icer f ire , and ambulance. ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ` n ' . ~ , t°, :a~~ . • ; s ~ ' . rG~ ~ ~~},s ¢ p p' ~,b♦y''ri-,~~ ~ ~ b~ fi; ,.t , w~' ; ~ •.4~; P2~1''i.. r::.l ?.#i i 1 ~7 .r~ . ~ a ;i t'c ,+f 6 yg : ~ t 4,4. e '~'..u^ ~`4 • ~ r ~ t „t • . ~ '1t ~I 'r• ~ ~'~i, ~`.1~ ~~'1 t' ' T S ,~1~ ~r . 6~4~ ~~,,57;• o't'~~:Y: y.e. ~S~ ~ ' .t Q.' _..A ~'d~`~. .~,r%~ j~ { txy•.'^ - r , ` 1~., .r~ ' ~a " i,:~' F t~,7''tl'.•'`~aY..= S. i::'.h!-3.~i~"yy~ .rl • ~s -^j ~ t ~c;•.y. , . ro ~ ~ r • ( op r , Yy ~ ~%'R .4'~S t'4T~,~ ~i.M - %f Yt; rd~ r' .F. dy~ _'~~%•°,'`^~b;o . g (uAC 191-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ' ~c ~B~ O~I~~~ ~ :~~.'S '~%'t• . 3~ i~ B. ER7IR0lilQMAL LLEMM ( eontinued ) '~~f.~ . ~ lti ~.6-'it~T- i i Lvalwtlon •for Agency Use Onl ~ L~'"` E27YIR01L~2r:AL RBALB (contiaued) 6F y i'•ti'e~.''~;t; •~'c~,.. . .$ri} s,, -ti9 .~~a -1> 1• , r1µ, ( 2) Proposed measutes to reducc or control envirottaental heal[h hasards, if •07: ;~*•;-1.~ry„ N/A ~t.; ; ' ~'•rr~=' . ' ru. ~ 2..5~♦ C-y- .6~.~St.ti. „ '3~ ~ L?i ~ ~F\. ~~1 /•tj• i't Y~S, • „~T~y ro nj~ r: a~~ Lr• ~,w> - ; . , `ya_ L•''.. T2 b. Holee: r~~~nJ .A (1) What types of noise esist in the area vhlch s+y affaet 7ouc oj~ct (fo~ ssa~p~c: tuEfic. equipsent, operation, other' r'3iTi(?l1Tlt ~f t-raf~filC` noise 1S ,_f, ~ •s...~,• ~ S gPnPrated bv Pxisting rPS-~lential units in the adjacent a-~~ _ n iQhk-Qrhoods and aloncx az'ea roadways. Occasional farm equipment noise is genei'ated from nearby agricultural (2'n11rP%e'[S1nd levels of noise Yould De creaCtd by or auoelated vith the projeec on a ehort-tero or a long-texn basls (foc exasple: traffic, constructlon, operation, othar)? Iodicate vhac hour• noise would coie froo the •ite. y- C~,~ a~- ~~nl~ cv~ _ b~~14;~P • y 1 E ~ ~M~-:•~,.~~'{~ ♦ ~7 ~r~~~ . f' ~ 5 .;;il.r•. , r~ ~f Yroposed oeaiure to reduce or control nolse lepaets, lt aey: (~ep -ttt.'i- C'hPd _ ` ••a ~ ~r~ ` •r ,•iC•'•~ , ' ' CfY tf'~ r ,'~~j~''S~1 tn'~rL ' v~>~) -t':F, ' ;fi's: v •/f :~Ti 8. la:1D AND SHORELIt1E USE ' ' • • a. tiThac is che current we ot tfie site and adjacent properties? ~ ' A,'x-' See attached_ :~A~ • .-•x;,:~. ~ b. il&a the site been used for •gTicultute' If •o. descrlbe. Yes, the majority of the site is currently cultivated in alfalfa, with the - , f-^~~t~ri - northeastern approximately 5 acres in beans. w:~ . _ • ~ c. Describe eny struccures on the •its. None. ~~•~r 4f ~ • _ • .f tl' ,if.~i +'l~~ • • •t ~ ~~~•k•{ 1~ d. W111 any structure• be deaollshed? If so, vhich? , c~;, ~7~ i ,`;:1 f, . ' •1t' t , • J , r?~ ' y . ~g . . e. Vhet i• the current :oning claseifica[lon of the sitet , Urban Residential - 3.5 (UR-3.5) . f. tlhat i• the current cmprelensive pLn desigoatlon ot the site' Urban J. ±v g. If applluble, vtut i• t!u turrent •horeliaa Wcet progra designatlon ot the site? ~1 ~ • • ' • ,r~; N /A ; Y ,i ~y;' ~ • 'r ~ h. Has any part of the site been classified u an 'envirommeeta117 wnslciva' area7 If so, speclfy. y ~ . s>- . .r4 1. Appro:lmacely hov manr people vould reside or vork in the campleced project? 1; - ~'e~~ Y%'_~R ;':`:r,•~., :'f , ~ ~si 't ,a . , • ~ , s ' f ~t . ~ ti~ . ~ y ; _8nnroxi matPl ~ 237 l~ e will reside on-site when the J Z~.'•~ ~ • ' ; project is finished with 101 residences, v~~=~ j~ i- -1 , ~Y'~.. cj, x~ ~.,~~n 7 ~l y~'r~`Y~i ~.r« f ~j4" ~ ~ ~~"~'`~~~~TMi:' F,i ~ C: . ~ . • ' \ fy"i• ' : ~ " ~ b ' "fi_y~>;.~ma - ~ ~ tR-•` :.a ,~~.j . 3 ` • ~ ' ';:1~ ,'-~A:, ~-:1. ~c'-J 4,a~•~. f~,} =`i . `h" . • ..'b 'e . : . V-1F. .,.~t~ iti?~'vt -...1:~.•. , r •,f, - LY ix . .t,•'rJ=r..r•.2•~• . . r v. .~Y,:}•'~,-'U, ~,r..• t'.. • t d ~ q~. . ~ ,;~J,'~•, ,ti''.. , ' g~~~ ~ ~~Z~ • . ' ~'~1' ' . k d~.,t v (VAC 197-11-960) Seccioe 11.10. 230(1) _ - : s . f • +.,i~ "l~ ~ r ~ ''~Y~ r : 8. Eti9T&OtIlQMAI. E1.T2SLNf5 (coatimsed) °vnlustion;.Yor Ageacy Ooe 0 4, .v~, y~._"ri None. APproxias[ely hov many PaoPlc vould che coapleted project dlsplace? •.ti~'. . :c J. `et"•'s ~ ir . duce displacment impac[s. if an7* :-'i~~~.~` ~ • f ' : to avoid or re k, Proposed aeawres j n . ~ .a • .s;.~. : NIA.. ' ' •Y~ :f_•~ l.'~r LLC ~ :~•u• t~ 't fi ` . rSC 1 ~ .7 • ' ' ~,~'^~~c,~> > . `F •v~ ' : 1. Proposed seasures to ensure the proposal 1• coapatiblA rith e:istin.; aad projeeted Lnd u+e• and y~,,~ .t: ~ , ~ t ' , ~e~ Yy plans, if •ny: , r 1 .~'c~P ,~t'f'A~'`~'1Pf~ _ ~ %••~•i},~ „ L , 1 9. HOUSINC De to~ nd. }f an IndiuGe ~hstMr, gh-. uiddl~ or . ,`~s ~ a. App~ozimately hw aane ~ •~'V ~ d SlI1@- UT11tS r~~ ior-socome houslag. be in the middle income ranqe. be elisinat~dT Iodicace vhacMt high-. mlddle-, ec •',,v^r• ri• D. Appro:loately hov naar ualu. if •n7, vauld lowLnceme houving. • ~~~~p :R. J31/i1~ ' , ~RR}ac. Proposed measure• ce reduce or control housing irpseta, it any: . .~`r " l. ,u~ ~•tia - r•• 't}1w` qF'~i • . - ~~,•y f~ x~ • 1: •X 4r;Y~~M'I~ ' sii I'~•.'~'_1 . ' ~ , . h '~•i~"t'~~\• : . b~1 :fi. . . L'~ ` , q F' ~'~%C, •~~+i~X!' • t~ ~~S ~ l ~ 4~~ ~ • • 10. AESTIlETICS ,1-j~~ • a, llhat i• the tallest height o[ an7 proposed •trueture ooc includi •qt~sma~t What io the principal esterior bvildiag oacerial(s) proPosedt P 5.:.:~~~ P-~am~ h~Q~ ~~r`~~`3 ';:J,`~ jr,~'• 7 TrtY t«-~.^ ~ l r r,, . wii i be tvn],r-a11v tw° stQri PS i n hei_ght- and utill-I)P ~ ~ ~ '~i' .1 : - l~,n, ; t lsinclal.it~T c-o s'----- - _Ltn.,q -..,d m-tpY'l 1~ CC & R.'s will control fi,he dPaIqL.Qf romPs and main nance Of COIiIiTIOri 3redS r c~,, •Y . ~ 14i~1 • ~ ~i.•S. ~i~~ . b, N1,tt view in che lemediace viciniiy vould Da alured or obattvctedt ThP C'l]Y'T'P1'1_t' ~~ndevel- ~ br,.~ _ ~ OAeC~ anrearan _e Qf t1E ~P_ Wi 11 l~e alteredy_ . Droposed subdivision. Uo va.ews will_ kae obstr„Qted or alter_Q~L c, Proposed mnasure• to reduce or control meotMtic Sapaets, if avy: sPP ttdclled- . t~.3. ' ;f `,.'S.•r: r~ ~s:~ ~ " 't i~r•~_ ~ ~f:t~j ?~.~~rh 11. LICH': AND C1.ARE Of di7 vould lt aalnl~ Oeeui' r.,~ "._e •Rut t7Pe of light or gLte vill [M pTD90Y1 produce' ~'i'~• `~.,J.~, , _ - • ; - • ,t r b. Could light os gLre fron che fiaished DruSacc ~a safaty hasard or lece[fere vith •lewT n ~ • Now c. IJhat exiscing off-site souree• of light or g Lre sL+7 •fiecc your proposal? ,K ;•RM G' e ~ y'4~ None. . rw' . , . n~~~ . 1 - . d. Proposed eeasures to reduce or control light and gLTe lnpacts, lf an7: See attached. ~7`> k .:-~~;,y ;S. ' •F ~ e'~~~. a i ; •H, i i • . ~ ^ Y •_i. ~ " 2, r • c . F`~a: r ~~s a,`~ • ~ • ~ V ~ ~4-, ' t Ak ~ , Y'^ I ~ ~ ••V ' • ; ' Y'{ . ' y~~g :5,^ /:r*.7',-yf ~ t. y:V %4 ~ • y". 4~ : a' . . St ~ d _ ¢ a Sf ~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~{''r. _'L. d. a r . ' , ~ a a : .,.u. ~~s• ..~a ~ • ~b~, x ~.~rF~T Y~~~~F~ '~f,~.. ol _ "f _ ~'3^ij ',a~' t~ ~^~`:v. 'a'~>i~~ . L 4- . ' {~'_i,+a-•:~=~, Y-~`'._ . i SPOT.AlCE E4IRQ19rIrHTdL (S1AC 197-11-960) Secti,oa 11.14.290(1) . ~,~~5¢r :N'L". ~ ~ ?~M• 15. EP'IR4NMEMA3. ELMnS {cpntiamd} ~~S y' . _ . Evaluatfan £ors,y, Ilseacy 12. R.E~ATTOH a«=,-r'-~`~'~€~~ a. Vhat deaigna[rd aqd iafaeu&l reereatioVAi oppQriuai[iei tre xn tl& izzmedfa[a piciaitp?_ See atta,ched. . . -3,4'+r~•j •N ~1~. 1E.~ , 'i• t ~i~s. ..V' 7!'y~F?'*..iT~~•1~7~i.' 7-; I k~~'~R -,y4 ,tE S 1t . T ~ •n~R.~1 e _ 4} . ~ : L° . ~•.a h. liauYi the prnpamed projeet diipl4ct anf exiscing recreatiaflai use+Y ft eo, describe. ' ,',~~z`,~. • ~ ~,kr.~'1• ~4s N • ;~~~f ,~r~ .t ' ,•3'S;,'• .f -,1~ ~~,T y_. . .~1.,~,4,, _ l e ` e : 5 n: - ~ ; t, #1rap4sed aaaauFe■ ta redutc or eaaiial isp&ct■ an reCCeOCion. SRC,luding rec*eativmi aRRarLUa1- ties to bs provided by [he psoject ar appiicaot, if Yrry: N La r w~ _ sf~51: 4 ~ 1 ' "f ' ~ 7^h~ §rke N 17. HiSORLC Jkm G4i.TlJRAL FRE5ERYATIQN a. Xrrt r1,frs nny pla[ea nr abjectr 7lased en or proQamed Fos na[Laaal. fsata or lccal pressrvrF tion reeietsiw known ta bc an or na:t to thm aiteF If so. greoarallp descrSba. Accordina to the Srokane Histaric Preservatzon Office. _ , ~ . there are no kn~ archaeolocrical and/or hxstori.cal .Ltp,z TA~~thii•L...~~r 1' rt`7j P~"'~ r .F~ ~l b- CeeeralYy deacrilre an3 LastiCaark■ ar evidsnce a! FL{sLOiiC arehaeo1ergieaa. ~Set[iflc or cultural ~"i'4~'~~r,}"`.,~~.,~ impaataeLCe knows to he an or nert to th■ si[e. ,'~w•-• _ {a, • k:; ~ti,,~.~ s~,e~r • s : s, e, Prapored aym*VY;a to reducc or COflLY41 iopaeGS. i[ anY: y[ T ~ h Y.~M-lkt See att3~~1~_ - s I~ •,;"f~"y_ d iS~Pl~~~ ir.. -1rn1~sa0R7h7i0N v;•.~,~y~ r~i; - a. Iden[ify puhlie ■treess and higFtvaya aervtrtg the afxe and descri6e propaaed ♦Cclq to the f' ~ existimg atreet ■yscas. 5hawnn ■ite plaas, if any, ,a•','„-' 4 i See attached . F-W . ~ A N~,~~ra P ~ _ j s7/~;d`• ~,t ~ . -:;1L~S ~_t~`:~r •{§t- b. is a3Ce Curtren[1Y ■sr+red by Public [raaAi[' If no[. 'ha[ is tkrt aFProxlaaCe distznte Ca thr ~',',$tn'~'"•~~;. n neurede sraorst atcP? . J.r•. , • i~1~ ti; • N,r- ~f ,``'Sy sE?i? i fk~,`~ ~7,~If~` :;~_al.•.. c. fiav nanr P+rkIn8 s aces wfluld ['he coa leked ra ee ba+e4 9otir ~a auld [ke ~'1; ~'F''~ r~,;' P P P ~ sf Pra}eet eiisinace° ched. ~.7~ 4~~'~L-t~ L••~- ~ f~'-`~r;N . ' f. ~ t~,~ t !t+ . , .~~i'd i 'tw--~4,~,~ 6; _ '~,.i$ r~,-•.~.y 1 ~['y ~i y' Y~~• d. W1,11 thc propnaa7, ryqul,re a" notir rpad■ ox stteetsF 4i l+ltprovewota to exirtSpg raad■ ar skreeta nat includl,ng drive~vays7 If ■o, 8+~ci11y deocrihe (1adleaCt +fh~lthrr pu6iic oc privaC!], - • '1o-,. ~ w .~e _ . 4; ; , ~yr 'r-4 qN ~~f ~Ar • i,~ -..5.~ ` ' rt, , I ~ r~l{~ - ~ •"•iY ~.}~f r `L T S 4r , ` 4~ Yr~' } e. uill [he prn~ ~l et usa [ar a~u; in Che' ia~sdiite viCini}y at) rs[e'C, za111 ~ aT &ir [riamT~yyrttatipn? Lf dv, geaer#llp describe. ~r;~,Fl f, • ~ . r' ,3-. cr `•+`i': ~7 LVo• , t Ny , r,~l.~•k ~,~az . ' - '.`Fl r :r.,~ ~'F ' r}~'~F'z~'s'k - 4 ' ~e4~ 1 ~ f-.'.~ ti~rvl - 7,~~-~, ~ ~~'a~ ; ~ , " ~s; • _ ' -rp~, ~ E , • , f. ~ 4' ~ ~,.,~~:~r' . . . 3..., ~x° _ . r . ~ - ' ~a • ,g,, ~AM,~ :s.ri•'.F~ , ; . t5 a}-~ ~L ,",F~..'i 5 l 4~~' e~ ~ ~t _ s~~~;i , ~1k~,r+'-.~..` • . . a.r ^•1<<,Sd.- -7 _•4ic+ ~ ~•..-,r;•, • • , . • • 1I C',ti fl t Nf"'r.` ^ 'h SPOEANL IItVIYalQaN'fel. OBDI11UCL ' - E`~'°~ ~~'''x.~~~~~t"~~~~;''~'~~:,,~ j• .eI (1tAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) !~rti~~',~' , { 8. ffiVIROlQOR'.AL B.EMZNi'S (contiaued) <~,~~~ja~~J , Evaluation For , Ageocy Ose Only rk ' . , ~ t f. Hcv saay vehicular crips per dar vould be generated b7 the casplotcd project? If Imova, s~~„`'~~ indicate vhna pnk vould oecur. / ~J -~:Jt,,,.;~' ';~'^~`:~s~ - ~yt' 'c~-• See attached. . a"iC r~ ~ h' ~ .r'~~3 ~ f` 'A , ~~y~~/ ~~lliL-/ S • r? - OL~ ~✓7• a- l a Sr•: ~6 . ~~j,~~~, I n~^•t+ ,R`~!i `.~r• ~}►?S• g. Proposed oeasures to reduce or control trantportatinn inpacts, if an7: • d~':r;~~r~ SP-P atfiac-hnA _ I::A, ~l ~ F!` . i~' ~ !•~Y~ r 15. PUBLIC SERVTCES 6• £~s'`+' r,~ , a. uould the project resulc lo an loereased wad for public serrica• (for exasple. iire protsetion, • police protectlon, healch ure. schooL, otAes)t If so. generally describa. . - i~~;'•r ~r~ GE~P ~tA['`}IPC~ _ , • . •~i~'j ~y: . ~ • ~`'Y"# ' ~ f(.~C.. '.Lj•'''sS •~^J • d . b. Propoied seasure• to reduce or eontrol direct laput• oo publie •erviees, 1f ao7: ' 4F1P afitached , ' 'Ary v • ~ . ~ 16. l3'ILITIES a. Circle utilities currently •va1Lb1e at the site: elattricicr, nstural gu, wter, retw• _4 ~S •ervice, telephone, saoicary sewr, septic systes. otMr. . See attached w ' •i~;~~,~,:,,q~`'. D. Describe the utilities ihat are proposed for the projeec. t!ti utlll[y providiea the •ervlce and v~`~ ti ' the general eoeutructioo activitie• on the site or lo t!r lasediau vieinitr vhlch dQht be ~x~y jo, '..t' y' ld`~t~ L~: i~' }'V a aeeded. ♦ ~ Z RP_P At't'aC}1PC~ ' ~ji , ' , y.~ A. ~~1~' '4' Tt f.,Rr,F;,Pi1~, C. SICNATIIRE I, the undersigncd. svear under the panalq of parjury that the above nsponee• •re made truthfu11y and to the best of sy knovledge. I also 0'~ , y underatand tMt. •kould there De any villful aisrepresenca[ion or villful luk of full dlselosure on sy part, the ageney may vithdii'v anq • ~~vY~:i ~ . • determiastion of nonsignificance that lt slght iesue 1n reliauce upon thls tteclclisc. ~i • 7 ~ , Date: ponent Rl4`h-Da'lfi. C/O Dr3hIt1 D2V210Di1eI1t , TIlC. (Ple"e Ps1n[ oi Type) K t~•~~.~' ~ J + ' . ~ i , • ,r,; . Proponent: 'i"~' Orancre Flacr Bldct, , Suite 215• ~ 104 S. Freva ( lgaature : ~3, "'p~~~l~,~ ~•~f'X ij ~ „t:. r a ~ yY s'i. r, ~2h '~f~`E-'.~ ~ ~r ~ . PhOAl: ~ Suokane, WA 99202 ~~i i~~ j~i~fi1~~''''~•~ perwn conplntiag toca:Pat:Cicza Sr ldlaf (Ramm Assaciates IT1C, Date: , r June 15r 1994 r << pnone: (509) 534-80RF _ . ~ y t; ,t •rr°~'^ POR nA~Y QSE OHI.4 ~ ' j~ ~~a °,~'r~'•j :e~ .~'~~~t, AtY • v : ~ ~j • : ~ r ~ y ~5.. ! 1S,L„ ' ' `~~.p ~'v ~ Staff n~ber(s) revieving checiclist: ~ . ~ . ' r1:^~ J -•i~ Baied on [his scaff reviav of the environnencal cheekliat aad other pertinent iafqf~tfon. the rtaff: ll ti ~ $ • A. Concludes that tdere are no probabla •ignlfiunt adversa lapaets and recmend• a detereinatioa of noasisnilicaaee. j Sy.`•~,°~~~•; ~~i;~_„ ^.r.•,~7i:~~tf:;;p • ' B• Conzludes that proDable •ignifieant adverse environmnntal iapact• do exist fot the eurreat pzoposal and reco~aendi a,alcigate4 ~~•;t~+~.~-,`'- ' ♦ N .r ti nination of nonsignificaaee vith condltioas. • ' ' - { ~ ~ , ~ • ~ C. Coneludea that Chere are proDable slgfliticaat sdverse environmnntal laputs aad rncasends a detetbina[ion'`of `slgriiticance, : k , N~• •;1' - , : dv+yrj~,~ ~.I~i rm ~ 775.~ •IY~t 4' ~ ~ d ~~J°•; ~i~ ~.t. Q t Y h 'b'~' . . ! . rr./ .r-. 10 9 x~yhP ~ ~-dc~+ i, ~`~}-j~ . w ~ ; ~ J~ • a l . . ~ r:~ -'a`' J t t_~, ~•'i~'' ' 9 ~4.'',C~' • :tt~ i ~ ' ' VM'~~' yi`'y t~ , . ;@ rJ • ti i ~t: a ~ j~ - . . ; ? ~`~a,i , ~ e ~1 "',.0. .L•f w"d% ~ ~ ~ h~ rt• ~~jr'}''t7.' f'~'~'il'~. ' ..i ~r 4: r'~ , ; ~ • .?;;t~ . ~ ~!'t J~ M1r r . ~ y ja,..~9 'Ai!~" ~ ~ yr • '~7 ~ •t'~~iD.+.i 7 wu163~'~.!•J`:'C.~.Mk ..s3r i. ~ 3r • . ~.}7.w~ fi'R,i ~✓1-1, ±,{r4`'y j~~y { \I. 13ji'.7a, ~ ~ . ,;~4'''r`,~,+a~4 f~•~,Sj •j; • , • -..{~t_~-... ~,I- ' :.t. ' o . •y r tf t vj . • • „ ':~4~r~~~~;;,-e ~'-SFy i ' S C ro . • :e • ~rI ~~'~o. ? {:.L~~c r:i' ~r~~•:;~ t'~:-' Environmental Checklist .4- Spokane Environmental Ordinance SeClion ~'~~.~s.•.'.~n.t:4 11.10. 230 [11 :s> 1 Attachments ' ' r:~t. , ~ rl_tt ' i t- ' ~'{t'~~'.. • 1 SI_ Q : ' 1 Y ' +v , ~aI i •'r~~~ ~ ~ ,~1,~ \ 1. EARTH ~rt; i~ ~s ~;4~ ,•s:~.~:~ c. The majority of the site is made up of Garrison gravelly loam (GgA), 0 to 5 percent slopes and Garrison very gravelly loam (GmB), 0 to 8 percent slopes. These soils are somewhat excessively drained and have moderately rapid • _ ,Y:~. . . permeability. Surface run-off is slow and the hazard for erosion is slight~ GmB has a thinner, more gravelly surface layer than GgA. ° r }3 . ~,,a.'; • 'r*' i~s'~,,t - • • The southeast corner of the site along Saltese Creek contains Peone, silt loam, drained, (PoA), 0 to 5 percent slopes. These soils are poorly drained 'and have slow surface run-off. A few places are subject to flooding andi receive deposits of fresh materials. The soil type has moderate °to rap d:;? .~;rat~ permeability, very high water holding capacity, and moderate resistancec~N' r~.M erosion. Other soils along Saltese Creek include Marble loamy sand tMa C 0 to 3:`1~~~~ percent slopes and Naff silt loam (NaC), 5 to 30 percent slopes. There aver limited amounts of these soil , y types located on-site and they are found~'L in open space areas where development would not occur. These soils ar'e'~~~ ;-N s:~ d►' .~4 well to excessively drained, have moderately slow to rapid permeability;:br~`d~.,Y:•~~ surface run-off is slow to medium. MaC soils have a severe hazard ofwind~ ,~^r';,.• h~'F erosion. : t~ :t ~7 .~•'f `~l , •v e: T'~ ,Ii . .r.. p''" S;4}*~ 7!,' wtI i`~,7,51. e. The on-site soils will be disrupted and somewhat °displaced during preparation activities including initial surface grading, excavating foundations;~~`-`_I;:. utility installation, and final site grading. Adequate amounts of fill matetials~',;, ;are located on-site to balance any grading during construction activitie~s. a a~ ~ ~~,r . .t 4.'•A ♦ ~L.4/••~t, ^ . . f. Erosion wou.ld be possible due to development on -slopes. Soils will be disrupted and exposed during project construction, thereby incr.edsing. the potential for wind and water erosion. This would be a short-term impact-'~---',` until site surfacing and/or vegetation is established. ~ h. Site construction of sewer, water, and roads will occur durin°Xg the. spring,::, •.;r,. t, summer, and falI months of the year. Wind erosion can be controlled:,by'"'' It 4~ ~ 1JT > ~i watering the soil during construction. Construction and placement drainage control measures (i.e. berms, ditches, and culverts) .,will r impacts of water erosion, if any, to the site. All residential and road areas;~:;:;.3'~pr~~; ' 1 " a. >z'~~; occur on relatively flat or moderately sloped areas. ~ • ~~4 z' -A ,y^~ ~c :a ~ ' . : 4 p ~ t j+9 ' ' ~`~i ~ ':r.~~~, . ,.i Fi~ • ~ ' y,,{~. ~ r ! .ec • P, ~ .~''..~'3 . ilr~,a ; ^ -~y ••t~et.; y,' : ~`r3'"4y . c••r~ • l', • 94-033 A-1 ~ : ;Ar-~~,?~ ~ • ; ~~4 ' ~ . . , ~~1 ' ~ ~ • ~ F ;F.S.1.~,~ r, ~ -,•~',~e;•, ~~'a:-1C}~ + pe: '~!r'i- ° •1'e.:f: . a*i `1' '~''rr`.i)~I d <P•, ~',i" ' • ' t '0 ~ . `i.i~ i~' • ~ s:t : a' c • . ° ~ ~ ' a .3; :',.c ~ ~ F. • ~ w,i`~ ' . ' ~r: . 1 t ° ~b. • 41 ' ~rr. t : s. ..1~ a`r}J a.. 'A 1~r•,;,!icS±.d..r'd'.i-.:. ~.I~~o'~r~ r~'•~.7i~°.Fi~ ,'T;~y` . ;r r_{`.t.~i~ ,•y'r~:r''i°~ri• . v ,,t~ '4~,~i 7• Ft Y~ . • ~ , • • t.-+a? ~ 1. r5~ 1 3~ , • . l .•.`J,',r''t`z ~r:~:Ts;. ~ .~IT:J{7'' ~f r• - . .j~ / . ' ~1`t•, = ; ' . - 's - ~-.t~~,~`' '``:ti, • , Environmental Checklist S okane Environmental Ordinance Section ,n -a~ •s:.-- ' 11.10. 230 [11 . F~ ' ~ ' Attachments ; .~:3rt~ , • ;=T r R,. y: :Iv; RYL~I r ' trf, ~ Ci,' . ♦ y :~o`•~tr~~U•`;Y~~~ .i~±y} ~ r ~n 2. AIR .Y~`- .^f. y , c4•:• a. Dust from construction and earthmoving activities, hydrocarbon evaporation i:from priming and paving operations, and carbon monoxide emissions from . y~.• : construction equipment could result in short term air quality impacts to the ; area. The completed project would introduce additional residential units and- aved roads to this area. The associated traffic would p present an , insignificant impact on air quality. c. During construction phases, the spraying of soils will occur during period's' of . . y.~: . _ dryness and wind conditions to control dust. Paved roads will be;sprayed~` where tracking from trucks occurs during construction. Construction de.bris-: will be hauled from the site and properly disposed of at a permitted~dis `IfacilitY. p~s : N~ 3. WATER fi= ;'"r;'~.~. a` ' a. Surface (1) Saltese Creek lies adjacent to the site's southern boundary. Water in-:this intermittent drainage channel is utilized for agricultural practices ari`d is controlled by upstream irrigation gates. Drainage from Saltese Creek : terminates in Shelly Lake, located approximately one mile west of the`site:. f`::}~'.~~.,` ~ ~ . , (2) Thirty foot minimum open space buffer areas along the Saltese'~ Creek~'.~~'s~~ k1.~~ ^~'i , drainage are shown on the preliminary plat map. Roads and lots- wll, be .•,.developed within 200 feet of t h e i n t er m i t t e n t S a l t e s e C r e e k d r a i n a9e c h a n n e l. , a i~•.f-~,~v ~ • ~,i ' . • ' , , ~ . • . (5) No. However, the Saltese Creek drainage channel along the site's southern . , boundary lies within the 100-year flood plain, with base -.flood elevations /°'~g'•' j~~h_;t'~ ranging from 2035 on the west end of the site to 2037 at the Ba"rker Road y~ • bridge crossing on the east. .•Y,;;^ L:'«`t f ~ i b. Ground : - _ t.- .;1[~~.' •.yti i ..i z ^y". N'l `t.T,~ ~YJ r~t : S ;,I (3) Stormwater volumes in excess of current undeveloped site volumes-'yvill-j)e managed on-site according to the County's "208" drainage requirements,.':~'~~ ~ ' ! l"t, • ±L' ±p The collection/disposal system may include construction of drywells~to assis`t'~,;~ in the disposal of storm water. ~ ' 4 ~ . ♦ . ' L.F: ?r y s r : i'n', il' a'`T y,e. . Y• .~,~.t4 ~ M y' ~.~nJ}f f~,s'y yt• , ,~y~'T'+~ ~ , ~ ,r)•'Y . l • , "~t • ~ ~[~.~T:2~n'- : ' , ~ .t t+ • :t<.r~ 94-033 A-2 i:~g~ :~-r , . ti : ei. ; y~;S i~ y; •t } • e r • : ~ ~n, , -~i,'„ J E. f' ~ . ,t, y r ! ^ ~ a~J~ , ~ - • ~`i; ~.i a?. ~ ` i~,' 4'~' . i' :tl; . . ^.1_~ :1,«-• '•3•:y- -w_ '~-.w. •~~~'4 ~ 9c 'It '.4"•,'~ ~ 1' t • n_ A , r i. 'r.1. .t: . 1 . , ' • ~ C N ~b: } I : i'' : t A j~, • ~•.~"r~r:,.?!Slr * : L _ a...: y~ r ~ 4 ..t-i..-e: - ~ ~ .}~I ~ . 1 ~`1 7.A~ . ~f ~ ~ - f~{~~~ ~ i ~ .t'AI!j~2: . i f~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ . ~ ,~r1i. `7?~ "'i r~f•' • a . , :r;:'~:t ~ . . . `~s~: ~"'.;.r.7~,~~y:s.~'~,:, • .i%~ , ~ ; Lc.s .y.Y' e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ' Lf~~. :'q: • t~ - ~ : r:~ ' ~';t'~'. ~`CS. ~ ~ . Id" ,~j: }5,~•` `~~:-3''.;~ . ~1•~ I Y"'Ti~ •l.l y}~ry~~ r" ~ ~5::`~l~ ~ Environmental Checklist ~ ~ ~ ~"F ?'r;~ ''-='=y~~r Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section y: YY~ ~9~=~~' -t• ~ , 7N.: %'L-~-"y. ~ '~w ~ 1cy 11.10. 230 [ 1~ ] . ~ ~ ~'`a '~'ls'`~~'~~' ~ , ~:j : 'tr. Attachments ~ ~ ~ ` =-~h. r'~5~ • ~ ' . .'r': ;i'~~ ~ JCY • .Af~~ .~~i ' ~ n;.. , i , ~:-R~ ~ ~ ~ t, r y~i`~~i. ' . _ ..~tr• . , • : ';~'q ~ 5~ a-~ , ~~`z{~ ` . , ~ ..~~';>i ~a"'':,'.,;,,; f~ • "~^`t~ Run-off from developed areas picks up various contaminants as it ~p~asse~s ~d~~rv y~: :K.~.'4. . raL al p over paved surfaces, rooftops, and landscaped areas. Contaminant so~urces .,t.~ ~ . e~ :;~~s.:i, f,~,,, and types may include: . j' ~ • Vehicles - lubricants, hydraulic fluids, coolants, rubber from tires, dirt ~r:~~~ _ ~ carried on undercarriages and fenders, wearing vehicle components, fuel ~:~+,c~y: . residue, particulate exhaust emissions, brake and clutch linin materials ;''r~` 9.:~: Paving surface~material - asphalt and its decomposition products°; Portland ~`;~''Ft ~ • cement, aggregates, road marking paint, expansion joint compounds,~.and , crack fillers ~ ~ • Atmospheric fallout - deposited airborne materials ,~a;`~ ~t • Run-off from adjacent areas - silt, leaves, grass clippings, soil stabilizers; : growth control compounds ~ .7 ~,.tly~~A~~ ;H; `s,~,~~~;~~~.~ t r, ~ys~ ,.,7 • Litter - tobacco and numerous other items ~ - ~'~k~~ ~ ~ ~ r. , ~ ~ ~ • Spills - oil spills, gasoline spills, chemical spills, etc. ..~,'T ~r- r: i . .u ~ti:~;: • Ice control compounds - salt and additives ti~~ `f`~'~°.~ `:~;r ~ - • Fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides . ~~i:~.. ;`-~f; .-if_ ; ~ >~j~. 7~y]~ ~ ~.f~;~; ; ~ : n<~ 4r~, ; ~ h'. M ~.7 , ~I P T~~y'~ I 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ~ ~ .,r]~,~ . ~+J.'~~' .C~~~. , ~~h~~;i2 b. Noise ~ t~~ . ~ ~~'gy • ~ , %•4 ~ . : .~,~~,'h".,1a'~; . » ? .;13~:•F{3:, . y,x,~`;~' r .4 `Y- ~2) There would be a short-term increase in noise enerated from the site,~:durin x` g , g ~t ~ . ~ construction due to the operation of trucks and equipment and normal,noises-,~~:~ ~~=J~~. . ~ - associated with construction activities. ~'`~~~•`j; ~ -'b~':~.':;l~V.: {,~~~~t; = r F ' , '~:N r~ P~ki:'r^' r~,.~ Construction noise categories include road and utility development, site preparation, and building construction. Earthmoving equipmentµ which`~ry , . includes compactors, backhoes, tractors, scrapers, graders, pavers,'~.and • •.ti,~. • ~i•~ ~ ~ trucks generate noises ranging from 72 to 96 dbA (observed=tifrom a'~distance . :,~'~,`t;` 5;~¢.'~ir• of 50 feet). Materials handling equipment, including concrete mixe~rs.='.a.nd ~:s,~s~~~ - `i ~ : l.i. a concrete pumps, generate sounds ranging from 75 to 88 dbA. Pumps, : enerators, and com ressors enerate sounds ran in from 70 to 87 dbA, 9 P 9 9 9 ,y4~.~... iy'}- ' • . ~Y~e 4•~r and jack hammers and rock drills generate peak sounds of around 90 dbA. r~~.-.~.,~~ . . . ~ Once the major ground work is accomplished, including the digging -ofsthe~= ~R ; foundations and footings for the structures, the noise peaks fhat ~are,~"~ .~=.:"4~~°. a. y . } • ~ ~ generated will be directly related to the erection of structur.es ~antl,;'-~~~J~: z'~f~ s~~ ~ ~ a: -:z ~x:- .1•_ landscaping activities. This would include hammering and sawing as~:well ~as~ .~,.F:;; e:r~~ . ' ti S . ~l r:_ t; .d„'~~. truck traffic which would be hauling supplies and materials. The-maximum. ~'i , ~ + noise levels enerated b these activities could ran e fror~i'.~70. to~ 90 .dbA.~~ 9 Y 9 ~,rf : ~ 4,-. . ~a.. ~~~~c,• I~i . ~ aC~~+'k t 94-033 A-3 _ ~ . ~ , :r. ` . .s v;, ~ r~. ~~c~ . ' . / , ~s~ ~rt'~ r:.. ~c , y ~ ,,~.a r 4'~;,r f'r' ~ j' ~,'~„~.lr. r~~ ,~,Y'~a" ~Y•~~~L,~y~~ •tiY ~ ~ ~ f]c.Jk.~i • ~l n:~ e =y^•,r~'xti~~"~ ' ~ • T • ~"C ' v ' ~ n• . y~'~ . . . r - ~ ,F i~~~ i';i• n~sAilr-. a,r,y ' • i~ r ~ ~+4} ~ ~ • ~3^ 3 i:r' ~u r ` ' .2 ~ . ' f1 f l.f t.f~ . ~ ° ;_!C~i~.J ~ .l~T: • rs`.'i.:~..••iia.i f~L~~l..~~.{tt'd • e . , ~ ~ `r.~,a h :'.•^-`N r` ' I , ,S : ~';`~`±'~1,~,,',~t~• ;'r~. ' ` s_ t',r~ y• . -e i ` ~ ti •~e9 ~-%Y}.i. r G-' ~w ' ;:•~}2 -:~~✓ti _ . 'f7 •.:~,r .:~~k,t a;r- j~ n ~ t tr, • •~•t;a~ ,1p . . Environmental Checklist ' i4.''~j.~i Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230 [11 Attachments `i'nr '~Y '.f'l i1 . t : .r, yg` r` i : ;F'o .ti'' a4• y` l • ` ti:t~t-~ ti'~• !':S , , ~ ~t .r`' i~, ~T , A • '~I~'~h t . . . .'1~A } „ N.) • '`p,~ ~ ...i t# k. . td It should be noted that sounds originating from temporary sites as ~.~'~~~~~:;s~=- a-=re s u I t r r'.;'~ _ . of construction activity (which intrude on residential areas) are exempt~f,.".•'::ro,m.. f,~.. :''4' J : ; " • noise restrictions mandated by the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). ;r:This is provided that these intrusions do not occur between the hours of ~ 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Following the completion of construction projects, long-term noise~impacts would occur due to increased traffic generated by the development -9-nd normal noises associated with residential activities. .lFjS~t ` . •n (3) Construction activities will be limited to normal daylight working,rhours.~: 1 ~ , , r+ Noise abatement measures suggested by the EPA for reducing construction • noise impacts include: ' ' • ~w;,.~=j~~•~fr~,1 ~~•.tM.~~,l!{ Y y~t~~,Y.:l "~y : u^ str . ' h~S it ~~Y~1~• j' . • The use and maintenance of properly operating mufflers and quieting~P devices. • The use of quietest available machinery and equipment. .;P~~~~t V ~ ,~~r ~';'v','~f sa The use of electric equipment in preference to gas, diesel, or pneumatic~f*;:-~.. ~ . machinery. r,~ • ~ : i ; ''t ~•r; • Locating construction equipment as far from nearby noise sensit~ve properties as possible. • Turning off idling equipment rY,t. • Limitation of construction hours to coincide with the normal workdaV,..~~;: pe riod . V1'G~.~)~`.}if}:~•' ~ v ~ • R• Scheduling the noisiest operations near the middle of the day : - ,--.~,a notifying nearby residents whenever extremely noisy work v~~ll occurring. y •i.?.:•"'::R • ~ a~ The use of permanent of portable barriers around point noise sou'rces: : .f.~ L~ A ••~J,~ r ~,qY: s{ • F 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE 'N`. ' .y.., r i% y , a. The majority of the site is currently used for the production of alfalfa and .A beans. Field edges and areas along Saltese Creek consist mostl.y,LL3of grasses, . weeds, a few scattered shrubs, and wildflowers. Approximatel:ytwo acres,~~3, 'hF of the site along Barker Road was previously used as a gravel 'p"~t.::~:.=•~ Construction debris and undesirable fill dirt has been used to fill in the~' v : e ~ : • Pit• 9ra ..ti r `i7° 'd,~4~ , ~i }5P n G r ;4,' ~'rr • i• „ %*Cx ^ ~ ~ `1 ' ' %r.;: ' - • South and west of the site is agricultural land. Immediately adjacent''on ~he.':.-_ south is a fenced area containing farm animals. East of the site is mos•.`tly-:a+•►-; . a},. a . ~2: ..r • ' !i • ` . ~f • .'.1 94-033 A-4 `~~-c; F`. ,1:~ . C~~,~'-:~,'•':•,ys: . '~5.: y'F,~'~'. , { . ;:,'L'`.. ~~t..';.,~ . ' ~ }T1! ~ti F, I' ' ~ Y • . : -J .t~,ir " r, i'f i•.:N'~ ait:: s: t .w'to ~l`„r r L` t•.~e' • . • . . . . • :,....~Y.1_1 .i..`..'~ ..r, r1'1 ~.:...'r~~ ~V~s~•.+~°.'..LiC. , • y+ J,`~a: • ~ .~jt • ' i , • t. 'a.•~;L~":~1)i• .9., ,`~i y 'T. rl,•' ' I .i;yJ:yM!~~ If~.~•..0µ~~,~. ' - . =I~~ _Ji♦ I~r:~~ •A~•'}•b' i• , 'w i;f 4 • ' °~~';~='~{'•a ' n f.~~ ~ .itl.q.r _ ,)7>6F.• J il; i i+~~ • ;.{i . Z 'j~,.• ,t, N. . Environmental Checklist ~ Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section -1~ r;~,~~``' 1 1.10. 230 [11 , • ~.i~ry'~~~.,`Y-I,? ~f 7~ Attachments - . ° w `~_t,..:;.~ : ~j~'~'i~~ -:i v~; t~'. • n•; N • Ti s e • • j4:^~°~:~~-i~ 37•'. • ~it. ~ `,•4•.•^~ + J vacant, undeveloped property with one single-family residence. To the orth are lar9e lot sin9le-familY residences. • 4' !=i'S :v+• ~c_n ~t. 1. Current site zoning is UR-3.5. The intent of this zone is to promote areas of , primarily single-family residential use in an urbanized neighborhood setting, 7^' " • F~_, s'• aving a high level of public services. The minimum lot area is 10,000 ..rsr~ . • ;f ~ square feet, with a minimum of 80 feet of frontage. Surrounding ppoperties_ are zoned UR-3.5. Lot sizes in adjacent neighborhoods typically range fr~im''k;i~ ' 10,000 square feet to almost five acres. Lot sizes proposed within Turtle ;x ~r:kf^ Creek range from 10,000 square feet to 22,458 square feet. A total of`&:7,3 acres of open space (17.2 percent) is provided within the proposed~'n: ; a subdivision. rtA'*'`. • ' a ~ "./F . ;G`fl . _ , 7r • ~A. 'r~' ` '~~-~'a`b~~'~~ . • y ~ .1 . 9. H O U S I N G ; • ~t ~ ~ c. The proposed subdivision will offer individual ownership of homes and lots~ and homeowners' association ownership of common areas. A homeowne~s'~~ association will assess fees for the maintenance and upkeep of all comrr~ora areas and private roads. Homes to be built on-site will be of a very ti h quality with strict architectural control of plans and building materials: , tY•.+~10. AESTHETICS y~'~~~• n•,? ' ' { ~ • y~; i r, ` , l+'.TJ ~ . ~ . • . c. Each individual residence will provide maintenance and upkeep of th i°The homeowner's association will provide maintenance and upkeep~ f'';~ • x.:~~ • : + ~a y~.+F„ ~'a'~: ; t ; , ' • . open spaces and private roads. Homes to be built on-site will undergo:'tr~~~:}~ ve i.~:'' ?~~F architectural review to ensure quality exterior materials and appear4ri6e~,~s t~y'~;~,• maintained throughout. All fencing will be of the same material throil'gt the site. All utilities required for the development will be underground.ft A_ a ~4 e . ,~;y , ' Y,t;~:i~ e1 • • 11. LIGHT AND GLARE ~t • y' ' ` J ; ~x .f p-~~.! t.•M ! , ' a. Exterior porch lights and private street lights will be visible in the~evening.'~r~~i l g M;,a•': . ~ . ni httime hours. The lights from the homes and vehicles wilk,beit.y.pical:.,ofi:r~~~~~; ~ . similar residential developments. a ' • ',5 , yt ~ . • ~C-,~+~' ` • , d. Well designed lighting schemes would mitigate many potential light irtipa f--' i~..of the proposed project. Light impacts would be reduced by using directio~al~':-.~~ non-glare types of security lighting. - 4 . . • . r . , . . • 1. 1 f. . i Y ' t 4~ T~' . 94-033 A-5 .a4 Tp ' . ' . r` v.ti'.~„' ' ~ ; @, o~?='~,~,~~ . . ~ 2; e";~~ . '..5~~'"ti~ • . i y^~ L(r~; L~v1'.,'~M;'j ' ~.T. `,yy .~'~Y•',~;~: fi;,l` . S.;il': • K ' .1 :~-f "i~.• : =i' ' t ` f ++4 • . ~ ' ~rj ~ ! . ' i'S? •:~`j;' _ : ' • , ' . _ yi i~'"k1,~ < • : i'• s~ ` VtY`'t-v•~°'iT``! ~S,'r,~~~r q,1 ~ Environmental Checklist Nf`' Y~.~i-°• Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230 [1] •.N ~z:;~ :3, ;K Atta c h m e nts • : _ '`:~'zl.~ti;~: " ' d;:. u '°R<~;;•-'' ' ; •~~4;r"~~,'r~ ~a~{'~ ` •~~i r,~ .r..?,,ti •.a b iu _ : = : • ' . • 12. RECREATION ~n"r':i~ .r'•.' _ :ti' t~i, ,1~.~~ j f. 't4y~'+• a. The nearest County park is Sullivan Park, which is located approximately7two miles northwest of the site, on the north side of the Spokane River. Sullivan . , Park is a ten acre community park, with three shelters, picnic tables, barbecues, restrooms, play equipment, and hiking trails. The Centennial Trail ',I+:i, •~'••'-r~1i is located along the south side of the Spokane River, approximately. one mile ~f-north of the site. ~'~~';y~r' 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION ~c. If excavation of the site in preparation for construction activities~°reveals,~f _ , evidence of a significant archaeological site, the proponent of this pro'ect,will~ - contact the Washington State Office of Archaeology and ~~.istoi'c~y;.t~ 6'f J `i' •}17', r'k Preservation and coordinate further development activities in that specifIc~~~ . area with them. - , ~,k.. ~~,~1. • ' ~4. A 14. TRANSPORTATION ~ ~ . y r a. The site will be accessed by two public roads extending south from Ei'60th . Avenue. Access for a future public road is provided to the south. `=~The County Arterial Road Plan designates Eighth Avenue west of Barker Roaci~as a local access roadwaY• Barker Road is desi9nated as a princiP ~ ti ~al: ar~~@ri'° , a, ,••r~,a adjacent to the site. Four public roads and two private 'roads be ~ developed within the proposed subdivision. 4~~~,` ~ • ',Z ~ L A. ; ~~u *r;~ i • , ' n b. The closest available transit service is located at the corner of Sprague an~d Appleway Avenues, approximately one-half mile northwest of the site;. v . . ~ ~ y:. Y.~ ,;t'., ~ . •I , /c. Each of the 101 sin le-famil residences will have at the miny g y ~ i m u m a;A o6;~e:, garage and ample parking space in driveways. No public parking spacep;iIC'. be eliminated by this project. .s, ; 4 "J= ~j:r, F!G "c1`:' " , • t, '1;.1 d. The existing public road network will be accessed at~viro iepoin't~sa;=:~, :j. : . ~F~' a p p r o x i m a t e l y 550 f e e t a n d 1,350 f e e t w e s t o f B a r k e r R o a d. A n a d. d i t i' oribP , ? • ~ .r. • ~ • , : • t • • access is provided to the south that could cross Shelley Creek in thei .fut0re°:4: , r r. fi. , ~ d Improvements will be required to Eighth Avenue, which is currently a{grav,e,l;;,~n; P~^ road. All new roads will be constructed in accordance with,;;'Cpty~`; standards for public and p rivate roads. , .,3,`U';~.;~, ~ ••H~ , 5~~'s G• ~t~ I r ' ;~~1~•. • 1"•'y • ~ .l' ; ~ Cy ry i. ~ ~ ' ~ r. J ~ 1.4y••~~y. Il•`".'rlidl r'Tr ';i'~ : r F ;~!~11 ~ ~f 94-033 ,q_6 !'ri, ~ 40. ~ . , ' ~L~y, ~ .s' - ~IR- . a • '~.•e-~'i 4 ;4, Qti' •E;.,,`''I • !i ~t • a ^ f . ~ ; ~ - ,y '~i .4 J • 3'~~ t ,'.jia ; ;a' - ' },'}`e'~s~y~~► •}.•2''t1~~:i ylr;~,~';~~~;i~l'11•; „ r ~ i+t_°Zh.~?. . i.ii; ~'o .7'f ' R,~e: ;a. _c...-v.M':<..►i" T K.-af y. ' { _ . ; s ~ : - t - .ti`,',~,,., r.~ • i 9; . . ~~`i• ~k~;~tif ' s'~ ~ . , ' i' • e 4.~V~' a'~!ir I„J~• ~ . J• , aYQf,.t~'j. 1 ~Y. _ ~ ~ ;a,3 • . Environmental Checklist Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section ~ 11.10. 230 [11 _"-.`d7"w ' ~f. Attachments , •~i~ ~:,+~~?.,r~ , a ~ z,.-. :'t 3;,~ •Y!, J, , , I71 Y - • lt f tJ~~- • • x a_wf f. When the 101 units are occupied, approximately 965 vehicle trips pe. day, t : l`J J~ at 9.55 trips per dwelling unit will be generated from this site. During 't.k~e ; . A.M. peak hour (between 7-9 a.m.) a total of 77 trips will be generated. 74-,~ percent of these trips will be exiting and' 26 percent will be entering Afie - development. During the P.M. peak hour (between 4-6 p.m.) a total of 103 trips will be generated. 65 percent of these trips will be entering and 35 percent will be exiting the development. These figures were derived using ~~rL~~`: the 5th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers~~VlanVal; ;q;;•. Residential Single-Family Detached Housing (210). " o ¢<~~1~ • Most traffic trips will access the site via Eighth Avenue. A rnajority of the?~r.. , traffic will proceed east to Barker Road and turn north to accessithe I-90~~'~ . r, Freeway. Some local traffic will utilize Long Road going north to~access"' "V Appleway and Sprague Avenue to the west. 4~•-~`~' Y~ t'' ~1, ~ . • ~Ln "~1" , r:Ng. The proponents will pave all public and private roads according to Spokane%?~~y,y:, f ~`8`~•• ' 1E} ~t a, " County standards. Two accesses are provided to serve all lots, with fut;ure access provided to the south. Stop signs will be placed where the rfe-w,-,~~~'~ public roads intersect the existing public road system. r,►,`~ r• st ~ .a l Y 15. PUBLIC SERVICES • 4 : •"rri~n • Lr j} 'y,~~• `4 ~M!' . a. The addition of new homes and associated population could result in ari, wp R increased demand for fire and police protection. However, the indiv7~dual "units would be built over several years and will likely occur in three;ph6ses. . The development would not by itself result in the need for additional . Q~4manpower for provision of public services. .~14' • • a►' - ' . , -`y' ' The proposed development is within the Central Valley School District.~~=7"he: . proposed subdivision would be served by Greenacres Element,pry, Greenacres .x- , ~ J u n i o r H i g h, a n d C e n t r a l V a l l e y H i g h S c h o o l. S t u d e n t s a t t e n di n g? Ceri t r a l;- ;Al' ' Valley High School would -require -busing. • ~ ~1 }•~I ' , ~ S 4 , ' e`1~ ll:5~f i i The proposed development is served by Fire District No. 1. Test fire`-' ,1}ra . . station is Station No. 3 located at 19200 East Appleway AvIen^ue, Jn. Yq. 7~~~~,~' O Greenacres, approximately one mile northeast of the site. The respo s~~#ime- i t~ L'.. h ,y7• . is approximately two minutes. .~~;;•ya„+,~ ~p.~ w. ~ r.. e r. y u j. N. b. Fire hydrants will be installed within the development to increa.se firefigfat a,~ capabilities in the event of a fire. The public roads will be tair:~•y~~~`=:~~~~z' :•r - . . N. an¢ ~l'"~} 3 s• , ; 44 '-~=`~it~l~ ,Et~ • • •c 94-033 A-7 ~ ~ : ~4* r ~ 7 y' .z 1~; 2 ,~•~T. . • ;t~, ,r% ) .~~1.~.''! ~ ,~I_'' • 'e rC'~ , •Y!'"v'•yy y. • t 7t . ; K:i'.. (~,..`p ^ 'P'p N L' ~ 4 .b 'T`4'~ zc` , • • : 3 ti. ; ; ~`.1~''•; , ~~r?-1-, "i.; ~ ~~r; S: a ~'"h•-><= 'r. ) ~y, . w. ky°y ~5.~.:Y.:s..•• 'fj :~'ti~s;•i~:•=`74';~ietyyt ~{►j~~.,,.~,•~, _D, u C' . ~ J °;4.~,fy^!~~' ~ 1~..~~•1.a} ~,.SIt'~ si't'.•'1r ~':!r -Y:S • • 1~~~C~! ~ • ;S~ ~ ' ~ e q~,:^~,~~+ ~ ` ~a Jf ~^'t~. • . fr y:,~~~~~'•, ° ~~M~k•o '~•illr•~, : . / i~ y~j'}'. + Y , a. 1• . S!^ _ lrr~ .R3 ; Environmental Checklist • ~g~. l;• K~ . Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10 . 2 3 0 [1] Attachments ~ ~ ~ a~~Y: Y lr.~ . '''`•~3 . :~Y~: ,a • .:Y:y ~ ` + ~ Ss round to provide unobstructed access to the site for emergency vehicles. Development and home building will be phased over several years, whict~;v~~j.ll ~ .~4~h~ y~.',•~ r l .J}~ mitigate direct impacts on schools and other service needs. {1 ~ ~ 16. UTILITIES ;y..5.. t•r ~ a. Electricity, water, refuse, natural gas, and telephone services are,available t~ . •n~t• ,c. adjacent to the site. Public sewer will be extended to the site by th~e project,:s:. proponent. Public sewer, water, and natural gas lines will be extended to.,., ~ ~ accommodate all lots on-site. . . , . ~as b. Washington Water Power will provide the electricity and natural gas4.needed`~ , at the site. Consolidated Water District will supply water service~;utilizing ~~r ~f the existing 12-inch water main in Eighth Avenue. Spokane Countj~sewer~'~,,.:.' ~f t~'.~ ,~.~'r• F,' lines will be extended from the north into the site to provide for sewage ::~~t.°~'~ .t ~~3:a'• : . disposal. Electrical and telephone lines serving the development will be;.qg,~~..: buried underground. H. ~h ~f~it • cy :r'. ^`ip,~?•. y p}:, ` ~~l et~~t~ti•' , ~ ~ ~ ' A. p, r~ ,~u., • ; 4 s~l • •'~j'Y' ' ~y. ~ l'.~'~~ J' ~7 N.• 1 ~t .:l. . ~;~•y, :.^4'~`~"~. r ~ , • i ~ P. r_; . y • - r. Y. ~ .rr ~ u~p~,`' M~ ,~';y •'ti . • V +~~~'Y~•rK.._)f'~, r =4? ,%c~~t' ~ 4 ~o ~4,~ ~ _ ~ ~i-Z ~,'~•1'f"~• Q~!%i, Ai'' ;f ~ ~'rj `~•~:~L ; / r~'`, ty~ a~.:1'~n'•~••s , e i.~~:•K. ~ 3~' - ~ : i' f ~t: - ~ ;C. ~IJ• ~,~i.< ~ N ~ ~ ~ i • • s. f ~ ~.`~1~~. . ,i,'l~ti r: t'• , y~ ~ t,.. s. . s~• f' ,~q ;"~t: t~~'~ A i•~, t•. •e ~J~ i'' 7r- .i.u.: ^}r e~•, A~'• , • o f •,,Y'~ 4`~ ~ 94-033 A-8 . ~ • , ~ ~ ~ ^ ''y .d=T i, .;,f,~D~J;,~ - "•.9 ~,s _ 'Y•' ' ~ ~,r..; , . -jL-~,~~_~,~,` l , -i~• ~ • e ' ¢ ~i ~~t'! ` y t'~}~ 0~'~1' j. J a.• ; ~1 ~4. , ~ h .a.'- • - . :c ,.~r ~ f , ( ' t "t;~~tYy + . ! _ ..r ;~,~~i: ~t~'~ • ' • • ~ . . •T~✓t^. .,"~i~'r'.. . , • 4;~` ~~rfi, :y,it`7 R4r. •-~`1='~•~'i~+'1• • , ~l+ 'f t.z' . , i ..~,k-'~ ; • ~ , ~ T, - . a, r,t- i a• ,n, ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION ,7~ • £~E Y.~tir1Y_ `•~~`~4~~~' TURTLE CREEK PRELIMINARY PLAT :ti-~ APPL/CANT JUL 13 -•~i`,~;; s ^f'OKqNE COUNTy.c~,~.~; Dahm Development, InC. ~ clo Rich Dahm ~3d ~G DEPqRTMENTj~~i, 4.. , , • ~ . . Orange Fiag Building, Suite 215 104 South Freya Spokane, Washington 99202 509/535-5777 lJ CONSUL TANTS ~A Todd Whipple Cathy Ramm Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. Ramm Associates, Inc. 707 Wes t 7 t h Avenue, Sui te 200 Li la c F l a g B u i l d i n g, S u i t e 217 Spokane, Washington 99204 104 South Freya 509/458-6840 Spokane, WA 99202 509/534-8086 PROJECT L OCA T/ON 1 h r ~t Y The site is located in the north half of the southeast quarter of Section 19i Townshi , a;ya~ .~t:Yy • ~y.".. l ~ 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., Spokane County, Washington. The site is triangu.,,ar in shape and is located at the southeast corner of Barker Road and 8th Avenue, nor"th ~ of Saltese Creek in the Spokane Valley. ,:.7`.`~'' L{♦♦' ~ 7, ' x~ . ~;~.'~'o *f r ,c,. • •y S/TE DESCR/PT/ON ,r~. :~>4; ~~~,;~1'~b~yJt~,~ :._jyt i• ! ,~,'jt ' ;i 1 y ~ 7 t ~~ry t~~ .'f ,t, ,~',{F• ~ g . I`; • ~•1~; • i♦~\ j..Y The ProPosed site is 39.14 acres. The northern Portion of the site is Pri afil~Y fla#.. sloping areas south toward Saltese Creek. Residential development has - .r. c~r. ~d immediately to the north, west, and east. The majority of the site is cur.rentl~j~used rr~.;t,: for the production of alfalfa and beans. Saltese Creek is located on propeTrty ad~ace;~rit~, y} a p'} to the southern site boundary. Field edges and areas along Saltese Creek:,consistar~;; ~ : 4~ ro : ,tDt1i tu • ' ~ ' mostly of grasses, weeds, a few scattered shrubs, and wildflowers. ~ i r • Y' 1 ` ' . The soils on the site are primarily made up of Garrison gravelly loam (GgA);~ 0. f~i':5. Percent sloPes and Garrison verY 9raveliY loam (Gm6), 0 to 8 Percent sloPes. p,6Th y' . .;~~~I.:4~ ~e ; . southeast corner of the site along Saltese Creek contains Peone silt logm, drained;. .~.~.:o PoA), 0 to 5 percent slopes. Other soils along Saltese Creek include @rb1`e'4damY' • .i ~t •f~.~'. .4;. _ . a i: sand (MaC), 0 to 30 percent slopes and Naff silt loam (NaC), 5 to 30 percentsslo,p,~s.. '"~;r', 13f`~r;.~r ; PROPOSAL DESCR/PT/ON ry.'lt~y fr r'T ~•'F a- e~' ~t" ~ j~',~• ,~l+*y,' J The site consists of 39.14 acres. The proposal includes a prelimina:ry plati, of•_i~J~~~~.:~~~ ~0 ,51 r: t~ ~t• ~ ' G.. p: ` _,~y~ pL- , "N .•,`d.3ti ' -e ~qa :f.a~~ ,.=r,7•~ r'~;•~• - • } i~~ • ~,F..T • ,'~,~~~~;~•-+a~-s.,'~~~'-{!`;`' ~ ~ ♦ e T 4 i. ~ ~ 4..~S / 1~ "E:Y bt.. 1 ,`i ~ ' • } ~ ~i y 4 j . . .+Sy ~ ~ ,a u ~ ~ . ~ '1 t iJ-~'., ~ ~ . • ~ 4:.~ .;zS'~• . ~,.a.~s- ~"'`tir~..;~:•~ ~ . : ' • 'r,} ~ . ~ i1,a t~ ` ~ 1 . d 1 . ,},'i'4 _t ,r,. ,e~. ~ )''iY i'If dl~~ 1 ~ ~Y 1 -Z , i.6- 1 ~b~ :s3v`; ~ ' . 3 • ,+~'r..~ ~k~;T=J',.i • f• ` 9 1 zi. ~i'.'.,Zat<....rS.•~l •r.•~t'=~i: i.4~!ry:.aca...~:.le;~. 1 t 'i . ~;~Y, r`r.t,~f'~r* .'_~'~f~ ' ~ ' K` ~S;,Fi~•#,~3 SJ~ ~ ~ . . : ys...y ~ r,' 'e. . ~h, I,"14)'!'r ~~.~i ' ,~::~';{y~~-1'~)`.Sr~;,~~'~'~~;i- ~ • ' , (~•f!. ~ ~ ~F~ ~ ^ R4~~. l~.r~4• , ~'~j L.. .H 1~ ~F A ~~Y ~ ` ~ • • ~ 4 r , d • : _ ' ' ~ ~ S ,~:ll sin le-famil residential lots within the existin UR-3.5 zone. .s~~'`~'r~; g y 9 Approximately 6.7~~. ~sF, { =~~4 ~ ~n,:. acres of open space common areas are provided. The proposed gross density will b~4:;;t~=. ,:;-x 3.12 lots er acre and the net densit 3.67 lots er acre. Lot sizes t icall ran P Y p YP Y g~`~`~ " between 10,000 square feet to 22,458 square feet. f'?~ . ~ ,~_'~,i~~~~~ r; ' t~ ~ ~'5~.~~•_ij_~~1, r yYy„~~ Two public roads access Eighth Avenue, with a third providing futu~e access fo~the~~~ ~ south. Most lots are served by public roads. Two private roads serve six Iots~in3~Utie~j- ~~~~~~~t southeast corner. l w , ~r'~;'~.~ , ` ~ - - . " ° ;'i~ ~ , ,*,,zi: z • ~4- . Storm water generated by site development will be managed on-site accordin ~ to t~e ~s~~` ~ County's "208" drainage requirements. The collection/disposal system will i~n'clud~'we _ grassy swales and may include construction of drywells to assist in the disposal of ~'3: storm water. . ~ a~~ ~ ~~~y;~~~i - . ~ t,, Washington Water Power wili provide the electricity and naturai gas servic'e to the.~~ ~y~~ ; j~~~~~~ d •~~'dr ~ s~ site. Consolidated Water District will supply water service, utilizing the existing 12-:~; . inch water main in Eighth Avenue. Sewage disposal will be provided by developeri~,~~.~ ~ extension of existing county sewer lines from the north into the site. All buildable lots;,, ~ will be provided hook-up to public sewers. Electrical and telephone lines serv~ing the~~ ° ,r~.:-:. development will be buried underground. . . . Y~ ~`'t~. A homeowners association will be established to implement Covenants, Conditions, P~~;~~ and Restrictions (CC&Rs) for quality control and maintenance of common ,areas and , ~ ,:.~i• private roads within the development. 'f~~~ ,v~;;: ,;r,; 'cb~,~~~ ~ S,, a.: T'~' ' - • ~''`~j'`',~" .~1 u~ ' . , Y r';~ ~ . t.;z- r" ~ ,.~r~t~~r ,~y , , . ~i s ~ ~t ~~'.~b', ° w • ~j Aq~• ~ +th~ ~1~.~ ~''rt S' I!*' :eAa ~i~+ ~y~: 4~ S~._. , .,i,' , ~ ; i,'F~-„~~ f'Y ~~g ~Yp~ °:t ~~4SJY IJ.~,;~ G T`~ ~.Jt. 7 ._S 't-~~'~T!A~i jf~j„4 ~ „~'-.'t~.j ~ ~d4,:~s ~;N,~' ~f: i '.rt~~' + . j~~,~ ~ : ~~3. ~ ~1 Y ~V.y t ~ ..Y~ J ~t)v tX '~i ~ ~4 ''~„L ~ ~ ( ,x '!~`t. d~ ~ Y r~t~~'~~ ~ • ~ '~~+c"~~~~~' '~Ey . .+i . _'~IY• y'1~ ,1~~ ,i •i,,L . ~a ~t 's r A • ~ : ~ t . t~'~ E ~ ,7~' t~' yy~.1.,~~ n?:.. k~' 4_I,~ y~`^I~ ,~:4q gyr!t• ~ Yys '~1 ,,~`~,j,'~•3°~1~r.~rl~l`~ ~•it°. i~`~' IrS' 1tij ~ 4',~r~"~ i~v d .1Vn'~ , ~Jt/~~1 L: I '71C1~ .4:,~^~ yt t 'S' y~~ ,,,yyy .S7^ { 4 ~ r ~ ,~[~+~y ~ P I CL ~ 1 ~ • ~J CG iy^ '~1 yl''~ •3Y'~a4~~v.j~~ L~Fl~ •r ~ae`iC ~•~;-i ~r{•'~ R ~ ~ ~~P~ ~ 1~ M ~~'~t~i.t~:f✓-• _ Yi ; ' ~~;:5 ~ `y ~ . ' " ~~~f~ .~x~~ ~ ' ~ .~i.~ ~"~'~:'tti j r-. ,~r ~ ~ F~_•~~~ ~~'s;'s;~~'~''cC~~~~ ~ ~ J~ • ' . n'~"•~ ► Vr ~ f.~,~.~ 7+ ~~~:^J' Z~ J:: , s ~ e S `~~f ~`~~~'^~l} ~~s- ~ ~ t ~ ~ 7 ~ , ~L: @ .~..•~u " ~ ,~~•~>.`,t~:~+ f ~t~;~ tc .t; ~ , fZ`' ~b, rg~~~{~•'' rrs_~y~ - i ~i , ' . ~ ~S^7:T 1 1'} "~'C 5~~~~ ~ *t~ : ,~.ys+..#~ ~',,T ,~~.~„,,~~~7~~~ , i~i 4 ~ . 4~ ~ ~ .U. • '~I~ , L Y~ .K' - ~z ` t - = '`'~7~` - ' c l ~,~~~~et w1R • * ~ , a : ~ c~~ ~ " v~ ~f a '~i~^r jJ p '~l`~ 7 r~1~ ^,~r S ♦x sr 1~ r.i y S S i;f r:~~?:~L•~wt~G~i~~~ ..~>'~R Q~.c2w .Si~y-•.b...~.-~6trt: l.~"' ^ .a ;^~iyx . ~ ~'s~ a~: , - •.~y'' :~'r r~;. ' '~t ~ ,;1~.: ,•ti:i : ' . .r SPOKANE ENVIRONME NTAL OIZDINANCE ~ . • j;~`~~ ? :T±' ~..'~r "7•,s J~. ~-1• . ~ ' . C' - J•' ' ~ (WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Mitigated Determination of Nonsignif'icance .i~: (MDNS) .•ws , r,t'_c'~ :1~_ ' • ; J lF 1 MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS'hEd~E'0, f,_,~,~ y • - . i A l7 ~.1V??4 FILE NO: PE-1753-94 TURTLE CREEK Couni~t io~ri r~ . DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Preliminary plat to d.ivide approximately 39.14 acres into 101 lots for single fa.mily dwellings and those uses allowed in the existing Urban .~}Residential-3.5 (LTR-3.5) zone. • i . ;~~D%` ~ i", APPLICANT: Dahm Development, Inc. AGENT: Ra.mm Associates, Inc. Orange Flag Building, Suite 215 Lilac Flag Building, Suite 2Q~h: 104 South Freya Street 104 South Freya Street Spokane, WA 99202 Spokane, WA 99202 . ~ (509) 535-5777 (509) 534-8086 s.. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Barker Road and Eighth Avenue in the SE 1/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane Counry, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY P G DEPART'MENT A traffic study, dated August 4, 1994, was submitted as an attachment to the SEPA checklist. The study identified certain impacts to the Counry and State transportation faciliries which caw,4,:s . be mitigated. - Those mirigation measures were identified in an addendum, dated August 26, 1994, to the traffic study and were acceptable to Spokane County and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Without mitigation the proposal would affec~Baiker~'`~~- . a ~ Road, the Barker RoadJAppleway intersection, Long Road, and the Barker Road/I-90 eastbound (south) ramps. The below listed mitigating measures have been adopted in orde~tok' alleviate the impacts of the proposal. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact:.' Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was madea~fter review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead'..~' agency. This information is available to the public on request. 'x~ ' This NIDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal= for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this MDNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., September 20, 1994, if they. are intended to alter the MDNS. . suz. • ,w• r r., MITIGATING MEASURES. . Z•i1.~4'd ~~µy Phase I ~ 1. Pave Long Road from Eighth Avenue north to the existing pavement. 'r; ~~a z'~~'~ , IR~ a.; F i : 'b ' ttr • 2. Provide a hard surface pedestrian wallcway on the east side of Long Road witli':the new~..;=`r~ ' ~~;'..-c= -~-s"• pavement. . .1,, ~ y ..~~;?~-f~; ~yy~rAy. . •~J: ` 4 'I ` J ~ • ~ 'Phase II . .~•;:;.:a:,,54y-J~.:d- _-er~'rd,.v.,,;~L.;~,.t`.",~7 C _ , • . c: 3. Install a new traffic signal at Barker Road and the Eastbound (south) I-90 ramps. The applicant/owners shall be responsible for design, funciing, and construction of the traffic signal along with improvements associated with the traffic signal. The traffic signal and improvements shall meet WSDOT standards. 4. Commit to 10% of the cost to upgrade the traffic signal at Barker Road & Appleway. The amount to be placed in an escrow account for future upgrades to the signal at this intersection. ~ Phase III ' . . ~ 5. Widen Barker Road to 30 feet with a two (2) foot shoulder on one side of Barker Road. P ' . S• • r~ _ ' • ~ . I acknowledge the above mitigating measures to be modifications and adjustments to the above - ` described proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures in the . future. 0 . Yb . • 7• •Date: Printed/T ed Name: Richard Dahm ,Zf 1 Signature: ~ i~7 Y . • A . • r: . T~ T T T T T T T T~ T T T~~ T T T T~ T T T T T~~ T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T .1 Responsible Official: WALLIS D. HUBBARD, PLANIVING DIRECTOR s .A B y: Thomas Velj ic, AICP . Planner II : Address: 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Date Issued: Signature: 4LO~ APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the . Spokane County Planning Department, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above proposal appeal deadline, being 10 calendar days after the signing of the Decision. This appeal must be wntten and make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department for assistance with the specifics of a SEPA appeal. J+' , A copy of the NIDNS was mailed to: . 7i.~ 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) . 2. WA State Deparnnent of Health _ 3. Spokane County Health District , 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering 5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority " 6. Spokane County Parks Department , 7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 8. Spokane Regional Transportation Council 9. WA State Department of Transportation 10. Spokane Transit Authority ~Y 11. Central Valley School District 12. Consolidated Irrigadon District . . 13. Fire District No. 1 . „ . ~ N1 • 7'1 • ' "r'{ ~ : . . 4..' . • !l~ ~ l /i % 7 , • •c,-`"- SP0KA_,,.Z CO.UNTY PUSNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATIDN : PART I . , A. GENERAL INFORMATION: NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Dahm Developnent, Inc. MAILING ADDRESS: Oranqe Flag Bldg., Suite 215; 104 S. Freya Street CITY: Suokane STATE:• WA ZIP: 99202 PHONE: (509) 535-5777 (work) (home) . . ; IF APPLICANT IS NOT QWNER, INCLUDE '9'VRITTEN QWNER AUTHORIZATION .,R FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. - LEGAL OWNER'S NANiE: Dahm Development, Inc. pHpNE: (509) 535-5777 MAII.ING ADDRESS: Orange Flag Bldg., Suite 215; 104 S. Freya Street . CITY: SP°kane STATE: WA ZIP: 99202 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SI'IF, AREA (acres or sq. ft) 39 .14' Acres . ' ADJACENT A.REA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) Non ASSESSOR. PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROFOSAL 55194.9025 . ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJAC'ENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED NIA STREET A.DDRESS OF PROFOSAL None EXISTIIVG ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR-3. 5(1991) EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Aqriculture . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley FIRE DISTRICT WATER PIJRVEYOR W7eorlMtWCt PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: Sinblc tamily dwcllings (x) Duplcxcs Mullifamily dwcllings Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( } Industrial ( ) Mixed Usc ( ) Ocher Describe: -czina1P_ fam; l v r3PVQ1 =m nt with oDen snace common area. LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: None B . LF.GALINEORMATIQN: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: 5ou r f Fi ahth Avenue. west of BarkPS Road, and . SECTION 19 no~,~~~~g~ltesRANGE 45 East NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Barker Road and 8th Avenue WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: Approximatelv 3,530 --feet . DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL (X) YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Barker Raad . . ' . , ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Auach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE r; LEGAL DESCRIl'TION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE StJBDIVII7ED 4N PRELIMINARY SUBDIVIS.ION ; MAP. - See attached. - ^ - . 171 3 . ~y , i • ~ • c• t__ ' . SUBDIVISION A,PPLICA' :N -_.Page 2 of 4 IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? , NfA ' . t WHAT ARE THE C-HANGED CONDITIONS OF 1HE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL WARRANTED? Sinqle-familv development to the north, west, and . east has occurred. This develognent is located in the Urban category of the Comprehensive P'Lan and meets the goals of this category. . WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES? Routine traffic increase due to the development.of a new subdivision. WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE SUBDIVISION? The pcesence of single-bmily hanes ]QgAtPd on the site's northern, eastern, and western boundar'ies; utilities , are available to serve the site.. WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PR OPOSAL'SiMp ACT ON , . S.URROUNDINGLAND tJSE? Have adequate ingress and egress routes designed within the developnent, single-family homes of high quality construction. Sewer service will be extended to the site by trie proponent. C. pREL.IMINARY SUBDIVISION CENERAL INFORMATI()N: NUMBER OF L4TS: 101 GROSS AREA: 39.14 Acres TYPICAL L4T SIZE: 10 t go.p PROPOSED NET DENSITY*: 3,67 SMALLEST LOT SIZE: 10, 000 Sct. Ft. MTNIMLJM FRONTAGE: 80 Feet PROPOSED SOURCE OF WATER: Tndividual wells Public sys.tem ~C ) Private Community System O ther ( ) - Describe: . PROPOSED MEANS OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: • Public sewer (K) Community system Septic tank and drainfield Double Plumbing ( ) Dry S.ewer ( ) Other ( ) Describe: . UTII,ITY COMPANTES AND/OR DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THIS PROFOSAL: Electricity: Washincrton Water Power Sewer. SPokane County Washin on water Power ~oli~a~d US west Gas: ~ Water. Wa er Dis ict Phone: DO YQU, OR THE OWNER IN THE EVENT YOU DO NOT OWN THTS PROPERTY, HAVE ANY PLANS FOR FUTURE ADDITIONS, EXPANSIONS OR FURTHER.ACTIVITY RELATED TO• THIS PROPOSAL? Yes No (X ) IF YES, EXPLAIN: . D. PREL-TMINAR~.' SI1BINVISION IMPROVEMENT INFORMATION: LEVEL OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED: . Private roads (x) Public roads (X) Artrerial roads Tract X roads DESCRIBE ANY COMBINATION OF ABOVE: Two public roads access Eiphth Avenue, with a third providing future access to the south. Most lots are served by public roads. 'Iwo private roads serve six lots in the soutneast corner. ESTIMATED TIME PERIOD EXPECTED FOR COMPLETE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBDIVISTON: C= tn,r+-; to beain in thP sprincr of 1995. Develowent will likely . place in three hase!~ over a period of several years. Phase I w~ould _ r gns of the site. Phase II woula contain 14•lbts in the center of e site. Phase III woula complete the IS PHASING OF THE FINALIZATION OF THE SUBDIVISION PROPOSED? Yes No eastern 32 . . lots. IF YES, SHOW PHASING ON THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP. IS DEDICATI4N O.F LAN.D FOR PUBLIC USE CONTEMPLATED (Parks, schools, etc.)? Ycs No IK) IF YES, DESCRIBE: . * NET DENSITY IS UNITS OR LOTS PER ACRE MINUS PRIVATE AND/OR PUBLIC ROAD AREA. . t 7 , s ` ~r ~ P `.•'qi,~G, p ' . . , SUBDTVISION APPLYCA N - ' Page 3of 4 . PART II . T'HIS SECTION OF THE -APPLICATTON WII,L PROVTDE THE PLANNIIVG DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRTTTEN VERIFICATION THAT THE APPLICANI' HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE LNCORP4RATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT - A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTI4~LD T NO. ~ B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) ~AVE NOT) BEEN MA.DE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PiZOVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTLM'V FACILITTES FOR FTRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. . C. RECOMIvffiNDED FIl2E FLOW: /~X'30 OR UNABLE TU CALCULATE NOW , BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFIIVITTVE; AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUII..DING PERMIT APPLICATTON TIME. 4~ D . REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE: w z - ~ „ u FIRE DISTRICT ~ SIGNAT'UREMTLE DATE WA7'ER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENT IC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS (HAVE) AVE BE MADE. / B. REQUIREMENTS/COMM TS: ~ ~ l~lt u'i~ Y ,42 . ~ WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURE/T3~I'LE DATE C4UNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINA.RY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN.DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS: 9 9 . SIGNA DATE COUNTY UTILITIES • . ~ A PRELIMZNARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR :SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (H,A*E-) (HAVE.,NQT) BEEN SATISFTED. THE DESIGNATED=' . WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS A . C OMMENTS : /J2-w-~' i ~ ~~~`"k c~`~-~o , ` ~ SIGr'~'URE/I'ITfE DATE HEAL'I'H DISTRICT , A PRELIMINA.RY DISCUSSIQN HAS TAKEN PLAC ~ERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) HAVE NOT).~BEEN SATISFIED. . . A . COMMENTS: 14144BC_~ A~ /~;V ~ / SIGNATURJtlTITLE AA'I~E SEWER PURVEYOR - A PRELYMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENER.AL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER A.RE UNllERSTOOD BY T'HE APPLICANT. A. COMMENTS : ~'~'f'`,~-►.~?-~.,.~,.. ~ . u dIGNATURE/`I'ITLZ_ DATE , , „s3 ' 0 v j'- • . - . . - . . . SUBDIVISION A.PPLICAT,..,-4 Page 4 of; 4 PART III . . a \Iz ----SN O0 SURVEYOR VERIFICATION ' A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATTON ~ I•, ~ ~Q .'I'HE L AL DESCRIPT70N AND PRELIMINAR.Y PLAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR -;UNDE SUPEkV ION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY zO DIVI ATIONS AND THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. . 4. , • ~ 18091 ~Az r Y; DATE: r~ DRES 7617 7 E a o PHONE: EXPIRE'S 1208./W - ~47 o y ~ ~ . zIP: --PART IV . (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORLZATION) I,1HE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJ[TRY THAT'I'HE ABOVE RESFONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND- TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFTRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACI'ION, OR, IF NOT THE OVVNER, ATTACHED HEREWI'T'H IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HI.SJHER BEHALF. SIGNED: ADDRESS: anqe Flaq Blda, Suite 215 pHpNE: 5-5!fi777 , 1 4-qnuth FrPVa t Spokane, WA 99202 ZIP: 99202 f f+~ • abOV2 ) (see abOV2 ) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE . STATE OF WASHINGTON ) : : ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOK:ANE ) : ; _ , , ' . : . rQ.Y,SIGNED AND S WORN OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS, I-T" ~ DAY OF ¢ . y-` ' . 1994, BY -L , . • . . . , , NOTARY SEAL Notary Public in and for the State of Washington y _ •..c.:. .n.a,c _ . / • _ , ~LOUISE A WOLD ; Residing at: ^:otan/ Rub,ic STATL C= WASNINGiON , My appointmen[ expires: C-Q - My Ccmmission Explres ~ February 1, 1995 . . . .•o. • 3 S^~ : . • .i PART V . ~ (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPA.RTMEN'1) DATE SUBMITTED. • FII.E DATE ACCEPTED: BY: Jt .4?W TOTAL FEF,4; ~ ~ 1 7 ~7 V RECEIPT E 7 ~'S , Z~2 '4~$`-~' u• . , _ . ~~,e . • y• 5~~ ' c ~7. r~ ' • • > • !i ~ - , ' _ .vt . S p o Fc n tv E G o u tv •r -Y . • , „ • 'D(VISTON bF ENGfNF(41JwC AND QGAOS • A 0)voMN OF tNE f'u0(,1/. WO0.1cS TSf,FA9k7MfNT Wffiare A. (ehtu, r.E..Cwwry Ent+,urr pann7a 14. fcen, f` t.. pneclot AGR.EEMENI' TQ PA,Y FEES '•x~ -«+'t , . . ,ycl~>C%LY} ~ ;S • ~ SNGf1VEER'S AGAEBMENT NUMeHR Ft:- i'i5'S-14 This tgrceenent btr*trn Spolctne County SnQ m~C~/ . 3 whaca idrerai in thc p%jtct b ~ _ . .1•~ u entered irta fiit _,1SL _ da o/ ~rne , 19 ~ Tt~u 2gteemeat b iJ+piic~ie (o cAa pTOjecc k~rtown st: ~ ~ . That the individuals uid panies namcd here)n is havinQ an tnltrstt iq ttx 2bnve dtscribed proDetty or psajecc 8=rm to thc Cailowing: I. Reimbunte SDOb+w CouMy for project revitN and tnsJ►ection fets c►s spulfied in Chapter 9.14 flf tht Spolcant Caunty Code. The fta wiit 6c bi.scd on auwt safary castr incurred br SpOkam Coutitp Eoc psojed ttyteati'ind f ot in'tpr.ctlont p)us z ten pctcenl idmirisfrativc charge, ac,d wiit be bi11cc1 monlhly u accnud. Any bi{ting amtrunu aue, including zny expeMU irrcvrred fe tlie celleetipvi o{ sn overrlve seeount~ nnw bs paid prior eo the Cotrmp'a 3tetptsnce p( Qlt pro}et1 fot filing. if a project is approvcd inQtar flod wtth a bilinrt stiU owing. the unpaid ba(ince shsll be paid wuhin 30 aaY3 o! Ua invoiea Q.te. . 2. T'ht undersigntd agre=s ihat these fees ue due and pay4ble upon tcteipi ef fhc bilting ns specified - ' ibove. 3. I+ny iavoices no[ pol+d within 30 day: of ihe invoice daic wi11 be cnnsidercJ dellnqotnt_ 1f arry ouusanding boLnee an iiie ,ccovnt (oc this proJect is nr: ryd witti'in 30 clays af the tnvaice dale, eio further ra►iews of tAc projcct docvmenLt will be eanduucd untii che e,itire arco+in! M(tnce is pald. .lay b:ltinse on ft ietounc tor this projoac r-ol p41d within 65 d■Ys ot the iiivafct date moy resuit in tagat itclan ar Tfie iniliat+on of oiher colleclien rroceauses, inctud;na reFtrni to a cotleclion ogeney. The 5ponsar will be fiabk for .nr snd aIl expenscs ir►ctrrrcd hy ihe Cannry for the cvitoction of ovardua ttcotitus. 4. Tiu marthly bitling ahoald be t Io the mocion af: , - ' ~ ~ l I na . ' . , NAME: C . , ADDRESS: lo~~ L• ~YGt. . . C(TY. SfATE: - l+e_~ W A,S~• . ZEp CODE: P?iONfl 5~ ~ ~ ~ ' f urtdcntand ihit fsiivrc to pfY lhue rtt! mar rtietlt in dclay in camplUlon oc apptnvat ot tlle ptujett or o(lxt p4tSiD{c t9nCitOns. ' f:' ' ';h•+' K~i~ ~ct, O tf thic fce agre,tmem is tomQieted hy somwnt o(het ihon fie SpoTVOr (i.e.. tht projtCt owptr nr r f~~'~j~~r~' `aa'-j:•R:~.,,~~~ .s ~A*F d , prirclp~Q in the firrn sponsating the prpjcet), such is ehe Engineer 6esi6nirig 1ht projecc. lhcn wrilten auftriplion from Tne Sponsoc lpecltict!! f avttlorwng l t ia , . ~•Arrermra! is'~tttt'hed tn this Fee Agreement. . . . , S1GNA'RJRE By: • (yRtNT NAME) • '~r . uFTiRtt~ Y~i.tAW COPY +e .`-n••, %*AIpRllKdOC IOZb VY Orc~fN~y Ilyt S(~k~ne WA 94'16Q~Of?0 iS~►9l a56-7~ FAX: (SQ?) 324•3475 'T'DD: (S09) 324-3166 •Y7~~;L F•.L~~ . Z00 'd 06979Z6-60S-I 131 141uWn ~ ~ „ . ~iv~vaVtl~~~VfaV' i11V• z ~ sroKaNe.wn's~2~az,z~ ~ Z) ~ 12720 E. Nora Ave. • SU;` - "D" • . : , ~ ~ " . ; Spvkane, ~ WA 992'' ~ . • = - ~ za ~ s (509) 928-5777 , 2, • ~ . ~ ~ - . tu ' - r ` cc ~ ~ . ~ ONE HUNDRED AND N01100 -,.bOLLARS ' v ~ . 1 PAY DATE CONTROL NUMBER AMOUNT • r TO THE • ~ ORDER OF 8/20/97 12199 $100.00 " SPOKANE COUN'TY ENGINEERS ~ . U ' h ~ O cn ' S w • . . . . . i~ : • .r' ' , u- - o _ ~ ~ A w ` • ~ LJ ~ L. 0 L 2 19 911' 1: L 2 5 10008 911: 68 2oil 8 13LJi■ ~ N U M 8 E R y DATF v ✓ ~ -7 RECEIPT qq~~~_ • " X. 'RECEIVED FROM ~Lf~:.~L~~ Y Address 12-72-0 . 99a ! ice) DOLLARS ~ /O(j ~ z g FoR p 1-;~5.3 ~ . C C2G-G q , . ~ nCCOUNT ~ MOW PAID ~ N ~ (iEGINNING ~SH ~ BALANCE I I I I • 0 A7r10UNT I' I ChIECK PnID Q199 a c M BAIANCE ti10NEY I• I 3 c"^eiso^jones. iuee DUE ~ ORDER By • . . •d - r' • -i _ : ~'~.re : ' . • . ~ _ :f ; . y' . i. ~ • - , . , . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ . . . _C . N . ' _ ' Y ~ ,y's-f ` • ` ~ • . • h,`~„ • ' .:9 r. ~ , _ ' Y` . i~, f ' • ' . . . . . . . • ' ' • : . i SPOKANE COUNTY PL A. . Al , (~l j~~ . ~ . - PRELIMIN,A,.RY SUBDIVISI4N APT'L { , ~ } 1' ~.ry~ PART X ' . A. ENERAL, INFnRMATIQN _ , NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: Dahm Development, Inc. - ' • `'.a MAILING ADDRESS: Oranqe Flag Bldg., Suite 215; 104 S. Freya Street it~~~.~.; • CITY: Snokane STATE:• WA ZIp: 99202 . 'v.'•'.<,,' ' PHONE: (509) 535-5777 (work) , (home) . • „ 'x;7 ; . IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE. . • -.A~rr y~`J~ I~ • Q ea , LEGAL OWNER'S NAME: Dahm Development, Inc. PHOIVE: (509) 535-5777 MAII.ING ADDRESS: Orange Flag Bldg., Suite 215; 104 S. Freya Street • ~''~l ~ CTTY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIp; 99202 . . . I. PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE A~ZEA (acres or sq. ft) 39 .14 ~ Acres ~ ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq. ft.) Non ~ t~; ASSESS4R PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 55194.9025 . . ~ ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADIACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED NiA- . . STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL None EXTSTING ZONE CLASSIFTCATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR-3 • 5 (1991) EXTST7NG USE OF PROPERTY Aqriculture ~ COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley Co solidated ` , FIRE DISTRICT No. 1 WATER PU~2VEYOR Wa~er District . . ; ~1 i rl •'r PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY: . • i~~~5ri'~i ~5 i 7 . Sinblc tamily dwcilinbs (x) Duplcxcs ( ) MulUfamily dwcllings ( Manufactured homcs O Business O Industrial O Mixed Use,(-~)ot'~~'`~;~`z:; . 4ther Describe: .Sinr31P-fam; I v r7pvP1 ~~mPnt- w; _h oDen space common area~,: LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: . None - ~ . • ' . 4;~ J"~ o B. LF'~''~AL iNFORMA,TION: L LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: SQU h of E; ahth Avenue, west of Barker Road, and ~ . ; SECTION 19 noH~'1tesCh t ~ . r RA.NGE 45 Eas . NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS: Barker Road and 8th Avenue •:~`~~3 ~ . . :t~ WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD: ApAroximatelv 3, 530 feet. r. DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIAL (x) YES NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS Barker Road ' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY (Attach legal description stamped by Land Surveyor). INCLUDE LEGAL DESCRLPTION FOR ENTIRE AREA TO BE SLTB.DIVIDED ON PRELIMINARY SUBDIVIS.ION MAP. See attached. ~ . • ~~~4~,: P, . •~t~~... %c'~;.~' ~ +:a-; j A t.., ,r• , . }~i#r~;,~; . a ~S~ •~.~rz~ ~y '~.~w~ ~M~~' a _ ~ .;4r►~~ ~ ti: y~~, •~u •S ~aw~~ .`l, ~ ~ ~ i ~ • f ♦ ?`;~2 vl ' ~y Z KTI ,ry r' ~f' ~ - SUBDIVISION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART Il • • y.a~', ~:'~~('4; ` `3`; THIS SECTION OF THE-APPLICATTON WILL PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFTCATIQN THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON~WITH AGENCIES TDENTTFIED. RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INC0~,2PORATE~ . IN ''HE PROPOS AL B EFORE FINAL S UB MITTAL Ta THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. ~"~4 •`,~'~f: ~ , ~ FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT . ~ : . . - A. THTS PROPOSAI, IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. B. ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS TN PROVTDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACTLITIES FOR FIRE ••y' PROTECTION PUR,POSES. C. RECOMMENDED FIRE FL4W: ; OT:t UNABLF_ TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE• AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT . < e-~4•.W L~ ~ t.~ +):.tI'~1. a ~ APPLICATION TIME. l':': D . REQUIFZEMEI~iTS INCLUDE: . „ '•e+•'t .3t f, r~ {s . " , ~ { •~f: 1'i~%?4 . ~ • ~ ~ . . 1 .'2, •''j ~ 1 RE ~ ;.a;~<, a I•. FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE~TLE DATE . . ~-~,.~~T~•~ << WATER PURVEYOR A. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQU.[EZEMENTS (HAVE) ~ (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE. ~ eq B. REQUTREMENTSlCOMMENTS: p~ ; , . ~ . ~ WATER DISTRICT SIGNATURErI'ITLE DATE , . a COUNTY ENGINEER A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENER.AL REQUIREIviENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAIINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLIGANT. • ' ~r.y~.n~.-~~ ' A. COMMENTS: `f~ . ~ • "'~~Y~~ . ~ _ ` , ; ~ ~ i tS'Y.'tit•' ~ C , ~9 ~ /l~ ~ .L~. ~ t,~*~F:z; • IGN A ~I'I E DATE S . . . . , ` • ~k¢~_.~: _ ' .r,. . r~ •~,n C OUNTY UTILYTIES L~i ~ •~Y' RJ ~C✓j .1~ ~ Y~, ~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERA,L REQUIREMENTS FOR ,;~Fj-~-,~ :~ti,~-~ . SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAYE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. THE DESIGNATED=i`' F *4 WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS ~ t'~~' ~ • ~ A. COMMENTS : - . . ~ r: CF• " T•~{~i ~A ' ' . SIGNATURElTITLE ~ DATE ' ~ ~ , HEALTH DISTRICT ,`•~~s' ~:~~i . d•~„- i r P;'~. . ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED. . . ~~a A. COMMENTS: h.y t1,_ ft* ~ STGNATURE/I'ITLE DATE ~ SEWER PURVEYOR ' A PRELIMIlNARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR T.EE . PROVISION OF PUBLTC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT. ~ A. COMMENTS: SYGNATUREf TITLE . DATE ~ ' 1 ~ .L-:.~~~1 ~•~c ~ • .1 E t w-~`~' G. . •ri`~ ~J a• ~ ~ y~~'xr~~' w. • ~;5 ~1~'~ f~y.~f ' ~.,i . -~.F~ ~ ..ti.~R@. t~ij~~ ~ ' _ , . . . ; . 41s,'• ' q~ - 1. y ! - , ~sh± • ~ ~ ~ ~ t7,•~ ~i~~~juf~~Y~ ~ .lo.~~ ~ ='~4r`,~1'36`'^f 11 l.w ti"'N~ . ' ~ . ' ~ j''~• ~~L: 2' r . ~ '•.,,''"'s'~ "y;;i: . • . • ~~iY'S~:w 3r' ' ` PERMIT CENTER PASSPORT ' ~'r,, ~~`r.,, ~ ~ ~ (~t' ~ : ;~`~'`a~,~ ' Date: Number. a,s~y~Si~irl:ii~, ~ 1t ,?~,:;y,, • :A, a,,., Name Phone ~ .~~(r?~,r_ Address r. Comments: . . ~ ~ CUSTOMER ROUTING . .......:...r.: : . ..~..r::.~..<«.:.::.:... .:'..I:'.:'......1..t . . . .............11A . •r...~n:~ Y: • Lfl.Vt'J.~::.1:.... ..~.......::l.~:.: .'J:J:~.~::.•.•:::.~::::1f:~} Y:.:.f..:.1'. . ~ .i..•.... . . ~ •y ;y...fVf f~}1Jf!..... ...lf1J}. l.l.. • . d • • J. . . . ~ . ~ t . . ' . ' 1 . . Y: {•::::.i:•:: . : '.'f::•:•: l:: ~'f :i•.:• . ~ . . . i:i:.. .:1:{1~:...:.j'::::....~ . . ........ti. •`..Viii: i.~ J:: J.:.:.: iV: i: • '.'t:: ti•. ~ I BUILDING Department•.:.,.~.::::;:::;:::;~::»::::;~;;::;:. ~:PI:ANNIIJG:Depar~ment;<.::;:~::: -e:.Pa . i . ' i~ ~ • j Addressing , Adrnin. Exception , Approach Permit ~ f - ~ q.,,; x iy J;t,,,, • Building Permit ' i Arterial Rd Plan Info i Flood Plain Permit _ _ • ' • . • ~~~'".'~~,~1 ~ - • - Code Information Binding Site Plan Info = Public/Private Roads ~ _ - ~ ~ • A~~~~ `~j}~. i^~u Comrncrcial Review Cert. of Exemption = Res. Bldg Permit Rev. "•4Y Conference Comprehensive Plan i Site Drainage Info X• - - ~ ~ t~ Lc,~ ~v,/j-ID~~- y Ener(~J Code Info Cond. Use Permit Su~division Review C~.-/L•.~., C, ~'~K~~ ~ bJ • ~ ; Y:~ '6 ~ ~ ~ r I {ti'h. ~ ,:i~1 Fire Safety Review : Nonconforming Use = Utility Permit i ManufactUred Home i Permit Review Zone Change Review ff~.~"~' w.~ Mechanical Permits Shorelines Info ~ - / r ' ~ ~wY I'j4CJ`'` v t~' ~i Other Permits Short Plat Info . Q~~ ' ~ - . 5' Q~ . ~ ~~~v ~ : i i Review ~Time- out''~'' ~ I ~ ~ i ~t~ b•,` n : ,n ` . : • 0 Ylumbing Pcrniits Subdivision Info L• 1 Iip ! g ::...~r{},i5{:•:::.•~. . ~:1i J.; . 7~: Privatc Road Info s Tcmp. Usc Permit ~M--1LITIES~`D~epartment;: - - ' = ; . Q • Residential Review Variance Appl. _ APA Payment Yz'•'~,:~• r~~' ' . Sewer Permits ~ Zone Check i Cert. of Exemption Zone Info Subdivision Rcview ` . - ° , . ~ ULID/Sewer Info Zone Change Review . . ' , i ~a ,~r. • "~a ~ f •F ND FE1: KEQ UIRED NO - :E KEQ UIRED ~ - r K~~• ~l' • Rcvicwcr T'irne out Revicwer Tirne out - Rcvicwcr Timc out,~ ~ 14 ; I ( I I I .i^, ! ;.:IZA`,~•`~•, r.' l~ ~~'K• ~ ~ 1! I 1 , - ' M/LSlTR1PnSSPORI.C'TR 7!1 8193 . ' ~ ' ~ ~,Q . ,~tT ~ '.0.. lt~ ~ C .b ~ `1:'yN ~ ~ t L" , ' I• ~ f ...,~.i• ~ ! i~ i • 'f . • • ' y'.1.~ ~ ~~i~ ~ , • " ~ 1:t~1°,h~ ~:;k ~ ~ 4 , ,y•y~Y,~`~~ RECEIPT SUMMARY y , =y, ~ ,V~ TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9401062 DATE. . 06/16/94 r. :4fh1°~~r~y; ; APPLICANT: DAHM DEVELOPMENT PHONE= ADDRESS: 104 S FREYA ST 215 ..p~ =;M•;;~",~~`-.jt`~~ y.~r SPOKANE WA 99202 • ~~P~ <t . _ 7~~~-~~1 . CONTACT NAME : DAHM DEVELOPMENT PHONE= ~ .X;•r~ , . TRANSACTION: PRELIMINARY LONG PLAT AND LAND USE ACTION REVIEW F'J~•=~ ~;:4"'~. DOCUMENT ID : 1) 2) 3 ) ~ 4) 5) 6) , j'ti ~a-~ ti COMMENTS: FOR PARCEL #55194.9025 ~ . ' • r ,y°.~ ; r; FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY " :'e~, tA~~`+~`'. ITEM DESC RIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT - PRELZMIN ARY PLATS - LONG 1 200.00 LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00 'n,i ~`~•~?<'r~~~ti,`;r,~:~~~~~i~:~ ` -t ; ,•.,,•y~ M:;~~~,.'}y,sv,; r,,-,~~~ :f' ,;t;.i • TOTAL DUE = 220.00 ~~='~;i ~;1~;;:=•3 TOTAL PAID= 220.00 ~~~~~'~~^;`'y;~''`;-~• j~ ' •t jt `~L i' ~ BALANCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 061116/94 OOOO06714 7920' 220.00 PROCESSED BY: KATHY SQUIRES PRINTED BY: KATHY SQUIRES THANK YOU qFr~S ~ .~•'!,h . ' ~ -~'d * `,~j. ~ ' , K'~~tj~ r`t~ •t t~"7," • . . , ~ ~',rY;lr.) . ~ ' ' ^ i~-~; r• , ' •r~.~ . '-:.~'<'t . ' • 3! •~.l 'r ~v • . ;r ~ , ~~h ' • ~ - r. ~.,~•ir~ i=,~.~,.i:~i ~~~t~~ {,~y,+_•.'~'~, .i•t-~:%~ ~-F~~`;;,~. 14~ . !s . _ , ~,o ?y~r 1 , t • 'y'~ ~ ~'G., '-'vi~ ' ~tia' ' ~~~Tp1~ y~ '.t~ t Ft yi6 t.~,: g.v~l.' ••.t f 4; Yi~~'~• ,i ,',~{7, ~°Lmr~•~ ~tti~ ii:.1L r,4.r' ,,~ri'~~J i ~ J f 1 ; ' . :r }~'~•,L~ , . , t i • `,1~~' ,wr'~~}''. ~ , rl' . ;y~. ' -`:4 '~a•'.::~~ ` ~..;t ~.I:'i - r-• -v9~Y " ~ s .Y' J'~~ . if•).} ~ t" • e . ; ~ "`i ~ ~a: r~ "Y~;.. . • _ F~Y 'S.~ ~ ( ~ ~ • . } 1 ~ ~ ~,e 4~11 • ~ ~ 4~:~~~i .r~~C~O~ 0.,' N ~ ~li~~l~,~',tl~h'~•fcJi~w~i.:+:r i S °''''k p 6ane Va lle y 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: File From: Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Cc: Date: February 23, 2009 Re: Moldy documents: PE 1753 Turtle Creek 1St Addition Due to a water pipe breaking in City Hall's basement sometime last year, we are just now discovering that several files contain documents with mold on them. The State Archivist Office confirmed with me that I should make copies of, then destroy all moldy documents and made a note in the file, and that is the purpose of this memorandum. The majority of documents in the files were copies, hence when examining documents in this file, you will note several discolorations, gray streaks, or what appears could be water spots. Since these are merely copies of documents which had mold, the copies are clean and can be handled without concern of contamination. The following lists the original documents which were copied, then destroyed: PE-1753: Turtle Creek ls'Addition, Hearine Date 9/22/1994 Under Tab #1 • Engineer's (pink) Review Sheet, bldg permit # Or File # P)E 1753-94 (front & back) • Request for Design Deviation (goldenrod), $30.00, dated July 15, 1997 at top, 7-22-97 bottom, and 7-31-97 on back side (front and back) • Request for Design Deviation (goldenrod), $30.00, dated July 10, 2997 at top, 7-22-97 bottom, and 7-3 l-97 on back side (front and back) • Letter from Susan Murphy at Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. dated July 21, 2997, date stamped received July 22, 1997, to Spokane County Public VVorks Engineering Division re Turtle Creek (P1753-94) Request for Design Deviation (two-page letter) • Letter from Susan Murphy at Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. dated June 10, 1997, date stamped received July 10, 1997, re Request for Design Deviation; Type "R" curb (one-page letter) • Reyuest for Design Deviation, $30,00 dated July 10, 1997 afi top, 7-22-97 at bottom, back side blank, for Road Name Greenacres & Beige Roads • Letter from Mark Rohwer, Regional Planning Manager at Washington State Department of transportation, dated August 14, 1997, date stamped received August 15, 1997, re Turtle Creek I- 90, letter addressed to Pau) Lennemann, PE of Spokane County (one-page letter) Response to Draft Performance Audit Page 1 of 2 • Appears to be an original fax dated Sept 28, 1994, at 2:40 p.m., and received by County Commissioners September 28, 1994: Appeal Fee $210.00, from Micoview Landowners Association, 9921 E 6`t' Greenacres, Wa.; appeal also dated 9-28-94; appellant April M. Taylor • Five pages of yellow-tablet notes regarding "Hearing Examiner Comm", dated 9-22-94, re PT - 1753-94 Turtle Creek; Southern- Chair, Myers, Moors Under Tab #2 • One-sided legal sheet, showing Statistics, Map, Dedication, when 208 plans approved 12/30/97, etc. Signed by Engineer 6/1 l/98 Under Tab #3 • Original "Limited Power of Attorney", POA # 549236, Not valid for bonds executed on or after April 30`h, 2000. signed and sealed September 14, 1999 by Kevin L. Lybeck, Secretary of CBIC from Seattle, Washington • Original Warranty Bond, Bond No. FA5354. Dahm Development, Inc. for Turtle Creek 15t Addition, County Project #P-1753, dated Sept 14, 1999, with corporate seal affixed • Two-page letter dated May 15, 1998, to Bill Johns, PE Spokane County Engineer, from and approved by Washington Trust Bank, this day of May, 1998. • One-page letter dated June 2, 1999, to Richard T. Dahm, from Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager Spokane County • One-page letter dated September 16, 1999, to Spokane County Development and Engineering Services Bill Hemmings, from Jody Hattom, Bond Department of Seabury & Smith, date stamped received September 17, 1999. • One-page letter dated June 7, 1999 from Bill Hemmings to Richard T. Dahm • One-page fax dated June 4, 1999 to Spokane County Bill Hemmings, from Richard T. Dahm • One-page fax dated May 12, 1999 to Dahm Development from Kevin R. Cooke, PE Sewer Planning and Design Manager of Spokane County Under Tab #4 • One-page letter dated May 17, 1999, from Patrick Moore of Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. to Spokane County Public Works Engineering Department, Attn: Bill Johns • One-page fax dated May 19, 1999, date stamped received May 20, 1999, from Richard t. Dahm of Dahm Development, to Spokane County Engineering, Attn: Bill Johns • Sticky note on Fax Transmittal of 9-1-99: Stick note reads: "Turtle Creek II Bill, project complete. RS" • Five-page letter from Todd Whipple, dated August 26, 1994, to Pat Harper at Spokane County Planning Department NOTE: There were no documents at all under tabs #5, 6 and 8 H:\cbainbridge\Letters Memoslmoldy file Turtle Creekl.doc Response to Draft Performance Audit Page 2 of 2 1 ' fl . . . -~,j . ^ • . RT DEVELOPMENT, L. L. C. 12720 E. NOR.A, SUITE E _ SPOKANE, WA 99216-1197 RECE/V 509/928-5777 ~D . SEp 3 /7 1999 c ; n OUNTY ENGINEER • n,, . f. ~ . September 29, 1999 . , Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 . . _ Attention: Pat Harper Re: Offsite Pedestrian Pathway for Turtle Creek and Turtle Creek South Dear Pat: I have enclosed a copy of the fully executed memo of September 28, 1999, regarding the Barker pathway. ' I will have Tim Schwab of CLC Associates, Inc. make a notation on the path plans in accordance with this agreement. Very truly yours, t--- `n ~ Richard T. Dahm, ManaQer Encl. cc: Bill Hemmings - Spokane County Engineers cc: Tim Schwab - CLC Associates, Inc. . ' M V ` ~ rIo. 7S1 z.~ p• , _ ounty Public Works,, Sp! ane County Engine• • . Memo To; PE 1815, TurSe Creek South and PE 1753 TurUe Creek Fdes ~ Fro rn: Pat Harper, Transportation Engineering Supervisor'?4A , CC: Bill Hemmings, P.E., Development Services . Dafe: September 28, 1999 Rw Off-si~e pedestrian pathway for requiremenfs ior Turde Creslc South znd Turtle Crzek l"he fwo preliminary plats of PE 1815, Turde Creek South, owned by R.T. Deve!opment !1C and PE 1753 Turtlo Crzek, which is owned by Dahm Deve!opment (nc. are fhe subject of this agreement. Tnese plats are located in the southwest quzdrant of 80 Avenue and earker Road intersedon and have identiczf conditions of approval regarding an ofr-site paihway to be constructed along Barker Raad to provide ror non-motor'rzed safety concems raiGed in the public hearinas and envROnmenfai documents for the re,spective plats. Based upon the recent submitfa( a; TurUe Creek South phase I the followina requirement shp-ll be imposed. 7 The applicant zgrees to construct the pathway per the condifions of approvd or Turtle Creek Souch extending along fhe frontage of Barkzr Road and ferminating at 8'^ Avenue, Tnis Improverrc-nt requires the submittal of plans and eRher construction of /or approprizte surety provided for this patfmay prior to finaJ plat approval. The applic-dnt further 2grees that prior to finalizadon vr 2ny aCCitional plats within PE 1815, iurtle Creek South or PE 1753 Turtie Creek the applicant shall c,onszrucf fne ol-f-sitz pathway as descrilbed in their respec+,~ve conditions of approval alon r Road from 81 venue north to Apple,v-ay, ~ Reviewed and Aclmowledged by Date / / . Dahm Development, Inc. R; rd T ahm, Presldent, ~ By: RT Deve!opment LLC Ri ' ard T. Dahm, Manager • page 1 t.~ NAME NO • . TA'I'ISTICS DArr ~ r ~ Plat Clicck Fce 9'7 ~ Number of Lots 2,1 Road Miles (New) o nc~ Total Area- . ~ ~ ~ . ~ • ~ ~ ~ ' . ~ ~~7 ~ ~ _ - . -=Y_--._._.~_ . MAP Norlli ArrowY ~ Scale ~ C~- Legcnd V ~ Pracedures & Equipment OR, Basis.of Bearings ~ A-515 CJ ke7 ~ Plat Location I3y Title OfCicial Signature Blocks Surveyors Certificate Road Namcs C~ ~ R01d w!dd1S ~ Adjacciit Arca • ~ ~ C~~ Lol & 13lock Numbcrs . ~ RfW Dcdication dcsignatcd . ~ ~ 1 Foot Strips 3 RPS on GLO Corners Tract X ~ Lut Arcas sU ~ ~-t3~~ IIencli Mark , Closurc ~.m•..__.-._.~ac 'J'~~~~ " ~ = r .r ~ - - . Q D.cDIcAr.IoN .~~l~i • _ / l V F/ ~ . : : . . Dcscription (To ap7 Description (To Cert) : Owners r~ , CcrtiGcate to Plat q T-7 (A/ C,~ p-rl 1 Foot 5trips : RID - CPR Statemcnt ~ ~ ( ~ e~ ~ ~ ~Sru~,~ ~ (~A Access Prohibited ~ R/W Dedication ? G Drauiage Language ~alc_ lJraulage Covcnant # . ~ I -7 19cR Li f P}~I r~, Flood Insuraiicc ~ 20$ I3onds -$1,000.00 ea 208 PLANS APPROV ED/J139---.~--2-7 Privatc Road Doc. #'s Privatc Road Warning Road Plans. ltoaci Bond Iinprovcmcnc ' Rvad ITuiirl Inspectioct Sisricd By Ecigincer g~ , . . . . _ _ . . _ ~ _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ . . _ _ . : _ =-r. ~ t C r~l c G~. t~'(/ ` Cb5 ; `Tt~w,v QJ~ A76 ~~1, 'jlA LO wahhl p (z 6-QLDerT. _ . A;.V r~ - , ~ ~ 6f1n1 al l ist.ck9195 • _ . ~ FROM ARIGLE DIST hlOR7}l EAST •TO P175;3 TURTLE CREEK FTRST ADD PLAT BOUIVDRY 5-19--98 Do PERTQ AUTO INUERSE STA RT 1000. 00000 1000. 00000 1 I INV N 0 06 41.0 W 58.2800 1058.27989 999. 88670 2 1+~48..C~~. ~ ; INV S 89 4E 12.0 E 2431.0600 ~,1Q~L , 3430.92711 ~ 3 iiVV s 0 00 0~r'~.'0 E 115. 000►7_i 9v3. 52102 3430. 9271 1 Lf 4 INV N 89 46 12.0 W 739. E700 , 936. 490:'3 2691.26307 5 ; INV S 0 13 48.2) W 4.5000 9;1. 99027 2691. 24501 6 h INV N 89 46 12.0 W :~52. 0000 933. 00186 w439. :'4704 7 7 INV N 0 1; 48. 0- E 4.5000 937.50182 2439. `6510 8 8 I NV N 89 46 12.0 W 1060.0000 941. 75E+92 1,379.27364 9 9 INV S 75 26 28.0 W 129. 26~~0 909. 25917 1~:54. 1~f485 ~"T 37 T hiV 5 0 13 48.0 W 65. 0000 844.25970 1253.88392 38 38 T NV l~ 55 08 05.0 W 1 51. 9200 93.l . 10L}57 1129.23380 39 39 I NV N 61 56 10.0 W 146. 4500 1000. 00`8: 1000. 00287 40 LAT R UEF' --0• 002a3 -0• 00287 40 MCLOSE S 45 24 32.7 W 0.0040 1000. 00►~00 1000. ~~~00- 1 PREC = 1 TQ 1280203 Area =286697.79 sq ft 6.58168 ac FROM ANGLF_ D X ST iVORTH EAST TO BLOCK 1 SIDELINES AUTO IIVVERSE START 1000.00000 i000e 00000 1 1 INV iV 0 06 41.0 W 58.2800 1058. 27989 999. $8670 2 ► I NV S 89 46 12.0 E 1119.8500 1 053. 78454 2119.72767 10 RAD I AL iV 0 13 48.0 E_ DELTA 90 00 00. Q+ RT RAD I US 20.0000 TAN 20.0000 L-ARC • 310 41 59 RAD x AL S 89 46 12.0 E RP 1033. 78470 2119. 64739 11 10 CHORD S 44 46 12.0 E 28.2843 1033.70441 21 a9. 6l}72u 12 TAtV@F'T 5 0 1: 48.0 W 12 I hiV S 0 13 48. Q► W 95.0000 938. 70518 2i39. 26 58f3 1; 13 I i+lV iV 89 46 12.0 W 7E0. 0000 941. 75£►00 1379. 27200 14 14 I NV S 75 26 28.0 W 1`9. 2800 909.25825 1254.14321 15 15 INV S 0 13 48.0 W 65.0000 844.25878 1253.98228 16 16 INV N 55 08 05.0 W 151.9200 9~1. 10365 1129. 235216 17 17 xhlV hl E1 56 10.0 W 14E. 4500 1000. 00191 1000_►. 00123 18 LAT & DEP -0. 0019 1 --0. 00 123 18 HCLCISE S 32 44 20.3 W 0.0023 1000.00000 1 000. 00000 1 F'REC = 1 TO 1127116 At^ea = 136964.60 5q ft 14,427 ac FROIYI ANGLE D I ST NORTH EAST 70 PLOC{: 2 S'! DELI hiES AUTO INVERSE S"fART 93E. 49023 2691. 26307 5 5 I iVV S 0 13 48. 0- W 4.5000 931. 99027 `691. 24501 E 6 INV N 89 4E 12.0 W 25►', 0000 933. 0018E ►'4 ;9. 24704 7 7 I iVV N 0 13 48.0 E 4.5000 937. 5018~ 2439.26510 8 E3 INV N 89 46 12.0 W 250. 0000 938. J0J.'.►9 2189.26711 28 28 INV A1 0 13 48.0 E 95.0000 1033.50462 2189. E4847 29 RAD I AL h! 89 46 12.0 W DEI_TA 90 00 00.0 RT . RAD I U5 20.0000 TAN 20.0000 L-ARC 31. 41 59 RAD I AL N 0- 13 48.0 F RF, 1033.42433 2209.64831 30 29 CHORD N 45 13 48e 0 E 28.2843 1053. 42417 2209. 72859 ~1 TANr_dPT S 89 46 12.0 E 31 INV S 89 46 12.0 E 64E. 0000 1050.83097 2855.72339 32 RAD I AL N 0 13 48.0 E DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RAD I US 20. 00.00 7AtV 20.0000 L-ARC 31. 41 59 RAD I AL S 89 46 12.0 E RP 1030.83113 2855. E+LF 310 33 CHORD S 44 46 12.0 E 28.2843 103fi. 7J08.J 2375.64294 34 TANKIT S 0 13 48.0 W 34 I R1V a 0 1; 48e 0 W 95.0000 935.75161 2875.26159 35 35 INV N 89 46 12■ 0 W 184.0000 c7 :;1'1 ~ 4qM:1 i :^'AQ 1 :-'Ai 1%ti7 w~G 9136. 490`3 2E91. 26307 3 NO CLOSURE ERROR Ar,ea = -'98520 32 sq ft 1.83316 ar- FROh1 ANGLt- DIST NOR', , EAS7 TO gLOCK 3 SIDELINES AUTO I tr1VERSE START 9;3. 52904 3428.92711 4E 46 T NU N 89 46 12.0 W 503. 6700 935. 55090 2925.26117 20 20 I NV N 0 13 48.0 E 95.0000 1030.55013 29`5. 64252 21 RAD I AL h! 89 4E 12.0 4f DELTA 90 00 00.0 RT RAD I US 20.0000 TAN 20.0000 L-ARC 31. 41 59 RAD I AL N 0 13 46.0 E RP 1 030. 46985 2945. 6423E 22 21 CHORD N 45 13 48.0 E 28.2843 1050. 4E9E9 L945. 7`265 23 TAN@P'T S 89 46 12.0 E 23 I NV S 89 46, 12.0 E 4E+3. 2B00 1048. 60997 3408. 99891 24 RAD IAL IV 0 13 48.0 E DELTA 89 46 12.0 RT • RAD I US 20.0000 TAIV 19.9199 1_-ARG ►1. 3356 RAD I AL • N 90 00 00.0 E RF' 10`8. 61013 3408.91863 25 24 CHORD S 44 53 06.0 E 28.2274 1028. 61 013 3428. 91863 26 . TANCdF'T S 0 00 00.0 E 2E I NV S 200 00.0 E 95.0800 933.53013 3428.91863 27 LAT R DEP -0. 001 09 0.00848 27 HCLQSE S 82 42 37.0 E 0.0086 933e 5290LF 3428.92711 4E F'REC = 1 TQ 142641 Ar,ea _57723.65 sq ft 1.32515 ac __•~-w t%r ( \ ' . . t•1 ' _ ..58044 111511997 ~42 43P CQ ENG EAS 40.00 Soakane Go. ll • After Recording Return To: SpokAne Counly Engineer Attn.: Rig1it of Way llepnrtmeiit Document Title: Urainage Easement Grantor(a): DAHM DEVELOPMENT, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION Grantee: Spokane County ' • Legal Description: PTN. OF SE}, SEC. 19, TWN. ?Sta, RG. 45 EAST, W. M. . Additional Legal Description: See Page 1&•3 Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(b): 55194.9061 ' Refercnce Number: Log In Date: 10-28-97 Requested by: BI:.L 11. Prepared by: RM Purpose: P] 7S-A RFNo(x).: 2058 Itoad Name(s): BEIGE & GREENACRES RDS. . ~ SPOKANC COUNTY DIVISiON OT ENCINL'CRWG Spokane County, Washington . • DRAINAGE EASEMENT IN THE MATI'ER OF BEIGE AND GREENACRES RoADs ~Rr, No. 2058 KNOW ALL MEN BY T'HESE I'RESCN"I'S, tliat tlie Grantor(s), DAHM DEVELOPMENT, a Washington Corporation of tbe County of Spokane, State of Wastiington, for and in consideration of Mutual 8enefits, the ' receipt of which is liereby acknowtedged, grant(s) to Spokane County, a political subdivision of . the State of Wastiington, a Drainage Easement over, under, upon and across the following described real property situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington: AT'FECTS ASSESSORS PARCLL NO(#).: 55194.9061 S&E, A-T-TAGHED• L1iGAL• DSSGRIPTIOP1- MARIC$D• AS• ATTAGHMENT '6A" se Tax Exempt ~ Date: 19 S~ - n u r, t,~ . riy~ ~ - - The Drainage Easemeiits, as described liereinabove are for the purpose of installing; operating and maintaining drainage areas and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff. The Rroperty owner shali maintain the draiiiage area witli a permanent live cover of dryland type grasses acceptable to the oWice of the Spokane County Division of Engineering, with optional sluubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in tlie drainage area as indicated by the approved plans. 58044 1i115Jiq9T o~ 43P CO E!G E1lS $0.00 Sonkzne Ca. WA - The Grnntor(s) wilt construct the drainage facilities in confonnance with the approved plans on file in the office of the Spokane County Uivision of Engineeririg. The individuaE lot nwners or their successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities in confonnance with the approved plans. The property owner or his representative sliall inform each succeeding purchaser of all Drainage Easements on the property and his responsibility for maintaining drainage facilities within said Eascments. The Drainage Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. Whenever the individual lot owners or their successors ia interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities in confonnanee with the approved Urainage Plan, a notice will be given to the individual lot owners or their successors in interest by lhe County. If not conected after ten (10) days, lhe Counly has the right to eorrect lhe maintenance faiture or have it corrected at the expense of tIie iridividual lot owciers or their successors in interest. , Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintaining the drainage course on private lots within Drainage Easements or floodplain areas, nor the resronsibility for any drainage whatsoever, including but not liniited to inverse condemnation to any propcrties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in Drainage Easements on private property. T'his Drainage Easement will terminate at such time the described aceas are platted. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set MY hand(g) and seal(s) this .Y -4 day of _o vt^. ~p.- , 1997 . 9AHM DEVEI.08MENT, A WASHINGTON CORPORATION B : RICI-~ARD DAHM, PRESZDENT y STATE Or WASFIINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss 1 certify that 1 know or liave satisfactory eviclence tliac RICHAI2D DAHM (is/aw~ the individual(o who appeared before me, and said individual(s) acknawledged lhat (he/9W&*~ signed this instrument, on oatli stated that (he/sbntcMqo (was/*M) authorizeci to execute the instruinent and acknowledged it as the PMSIpENT Of bAHM DEVELOPMENT to be the free and voluntary act of such party for tlie uses and purpnses mentiancd in the instrument. Dated this day vf 1997 . ; - • - ( . . NO' R PUBLIC In and for the State of Washington, i~ . . resicling at Spokane. fdd / My aprointment expires . rwformslnotice to public 6 carp notary\bc _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ 1044 . . ✓ 11~~j1991 o4'1 43P Cq ERG EAg $0,00 Spakane Co, M ATTACHMENT "A" PARCEL nAn THAT portion vf the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, T.25 N., R.95 E., W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washinqton described as follows: . Beqinninq at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 19; thence N.89°46'12"W. alonq the north line of said 3outheast Quarter a distance of 560.10 feet;' thence 5.00°13'48"W. a distance oP 140.00 feet to the TRUE , POINT OF BEGINNING of said description; thence S.89°46'12"E. a distance of 32.84 feet; thence . 5.00°13'14"W. a distance of 27.00 feet; thence ' ' N.89°46'12"W. a distance of 59.00 feet; thence N.00°13'48"E. a distance of 27.00 feet; thence S.89°46'12"E. a distance of 26.16 feet to the True Point of Beqinning; PARCEL ngu THAT portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, T.25 N., • R:45 E., W.M., County of'Spokane, State of Washington described as follows: . Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quazter of said Section 19; thence N.89°96'12"W. alonq the north line of said Southeasti Quarter a distance of 1296.10 feet; thence S.00°13'98"W. a distance of 140.00 feet to the TRUE PoINT OE BEGINNYNG of said descriptionJ thence • S.89°46112"E. a distance of 39.83 feet; thence S.00°13'14"W. a distance of 25.00 feet; thence . ' N.89°46'12"W. a distance of 65.00 feet; thence N.00°13'98"E. a distance of 25.00 feet; thence S.89°96'12"E. a distance of 30.17 feet to the True Point of eeqinning; ~ os ~ • Q E 1/4 CORNER SEC 19-25-45 • , n ' o I I I I I I 1 I I I I I , I 1 + en+ AvauE , r • ~ , . . , PARCEI. "B" OFF-SITE EASEMENT i i \-PARCEL "A" OFF-SITE EASEMEM' ' II I ' I II ~ , . , ' scA.E: 1M=200' ~ . - . . • . , , ` , ' ' . ' ' S"' . . . ` r- ' • - - • t ' . , .~,r . 1i . t . ` r " . ' . i. . . . \ . , . . . . _ ~ • r . . ' ~i. ' " .-FROM ANGLE DIST NORTH EAST TO P1753 THd{bE I~UMEF Z RST ADD PLAT POUNDRY 9-25--97 D. H. START , ~ 10OQ~.Q~Q0@0 100~+.2~Q~Q0Q~ 1 1 Ih!V N 0 41.0 W s ~ 1060. 9?988 999. 881 55 2 (~6 . : I NV S 89 46 12.0 E 2426. 2000,ao/,tO51. 190.~.i` 34cE+. 06200 3 3 I NV S 0 00 00.0 E 115.0000 93~. 19Q~~~ 3426.06200 4 4 I NV N 89 46 12.0 W 2051. 6700 944. 42E41374. 40853 5 5 I NV S 75 26 28.0 W 129.2800 91 1. 9286 1249 .`79 74 6 6 I NV S 0 13 46.0 W 65.0000 846.929 0 1249. 01881 ~ 7 7 TNV IV 55 08 05.0 W 151. 9200 933.77 8 1 124. 36869 8 8 INV N 61 58 02. 0 W 14Qt. 9000 999. 99 78 999. 99923 9 _~--------------__M---____________________________________-- LAT & D 0 . E~2 Q~. Q~Q~Q~77 $7 9 HCLOSE N 702 24.6 0.0063 1000. 0~D0a 1000. 00000 1 PREC = 1 TO $20415 Ar a=285279.71 Sq ft .5491:' aC RLOCK 1 S I DEL I IVES AUTO INVERSE- START . 10 0.00000 1000.00 0 1 1 INV IV 00E 4/. O--W 60. 300 1 0.92988 999.881 2 2 I NV S 89 46 12.0 E 1115 0000 i 5rW5400 2114.872 6 10 RAD I AL N 0 13 48.0 E i DELTA 90 Q~~t 00.0 RT RAD I US 20.0000 TAN 20.0000 L-ARC 31. 4159 RAD I AL S 89 46 12.0 E RP 1 6.45416 2 14.79 2 11 10 CHORD S 4 46 12. l~ 8. 36. 37388 2 1~4. 7921' 12 TAN@PT S 0 13 48. V 1 12 I NV S 13 48. W 95. Q~0 941. 37464 21 34. 41076 13 13 INV N 8 46 ".o W 7E0. 0 0 944. 42547 1374. 41689 14 14 I NV S 7 2E 0 W` 129. ~ 00 911. 92772 1249. 28809 15 15 INV S 0 13 . W ~ 65. 0 84E.92824 1249.02717 16 16 I NV N 55 8 0 . 151. 2 933. 7731 2 1 124. 37704 17 17 INV N 61 8 02 W 140 9 0 999. 99282 1000. 00759 18 AT & DEP . 0.00718 -0. 00759 18 HCLOS N 4E 3 35.0 W .0104 - 1 000. 00000 1020. 00000 1 RREC = TO 2440 0 Ar,ea = 13 81.12 sq ft 3.13777 ac FROM A LE TST iVORTH EAST TO i' • ~'r rw • • w ~ wJ ~ V AUTO INVERS START ' 93E. : , , JJ : 424. 06200 19 19 INV N 89 6 1 0 W 503. 6700. 938. 2--w40 29`0. 39EtD6 20 20 T IUV N 0 1..., 0 E 95. 0000 1 033. 21964 2920.77741 21 RAD I AL N E39 4E 12.0 W DEL..TA 90 00 00.0 RT RAD I US 20.000 TAN 20.000 L--ARC 31.41 RAD I AL N ilt 13 48.0 E RP 1033.13935 2940. 777:'S 22 21 CHORD iV 45 13 48.0 E 28.2843 1053. 13919 2940. 85753 23 TANCdPT 5 89 46 12. E 23 I NV S 89 4E+ 12.0 E 463.2800 1051.27947 3404.13380 24 RAD I AL. N 0 13 48.0 E - DELTA 89 46 1 2. 0- RT RAD I US 20.0000 TAN 19.9199 L--ARC 31.3356 RAD I AL N 90 00 00.0 E ~ 3404. 0535: RF' 103 N,A .:?4 CHORD 5 44 5" 06.0 E 28.2274 103 .s 3424.05352 26 TAN@F'T S 0 00 00.0 E 2E IIVV S 0 00 00.0 E 95.0800 93J.19963 3424.05352 27 LAT & DEF, . 00109 0.00848 27 HCLOSE S 82 42 37.0 E 0.0086 9%a 19855 3424.06200 19 F'REC = 1 TO 142641 - Area = 57723.65 5q ft', 1.32515 aC FROM ANGLE DIST N RTH EAST TO gLOCK 2 STDELINES AU70 TNVERSE STAF~T 938. 4211 ' ' 870. 39646 ~'8 28 INV iV 89 46 12.0 68G. 0@00 41.1748 184. 40199 29 29 INV N 0 13 48.0 95. Q►000-4 Q~36. 17412 - 184. 78334 30 RAD I AL N 89 46 12.0 DELTA 90 00 Q+O. 0 RT RAD I US 20.0000 TAN 2-0. Q~~00 L-ARC 31. 40159 RAD I AL N 0 13 8.0 E RP 1036. ~84 22Q~~►. 7~3318 31 .30 CHORD IV 45 13 4. 0 E "8.22 1056.0 95 68 `204. 86346 -2 TANCdPT S 89 46 1-2 0 32 I NV S 89 46 12. 646. 0 1 0S3P. 50047 2850. 8582E+ 33 RAD T AL N 0 13 48. E DELTA 90 00 00. RT RAD T US 20.0 0 TAN 20 . 00 0% L-ARC 31. 41 RAD I AL S 89 4 12.0 RP 1 033. 50064 2850.77797 34 33 CNORD S 44 46 12. E 28.2843 1033.42035 2870. 77781 35 TANCdPT S 0 1; 48.0 35 I NU S 0 13 48.0 W 95.0000 938.42112 `87Qt. 39646 .36 938. 421 12 2870. ; 9646 28 , ND CLOSURE ERROR Ar,ea = 78718.32 sq ft 1.80712 ac ~ ~ . . ~ . . . ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . ~ ' ' " ' ` ' r ~ .C~ i,- r r-~. «~*~.T ~ l~ • ~ f1 ~ 7 ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY 707 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 (509)458-6840 Fax: (509)458-6844 TO: DATE: ~1,~ - 2- 3 -97 I.P.E. PROJECT ATTENTION: 311-1, NEIrIM/AJ61 S, f?IP, PROJECT NAME: ~ Description ~ M~~~ » a c Q~~e ~ ~ /X, I ~ Xerox Prints N ~ Copy of Letter r ) M~ Original Drawing M ~ Contract Documents M I-Alo r i s~s ~ 9 y~ I I Work Authorization M I Report No. Copies Description . 7~5 ~Ii -rp GS%el N I Informatiur: I I Review & Comments PX1 Per Your kequest I IWritten tipproval M~ S ignature & Return M~ R.emarKs ~ ):F~ rM~ ~ . ~ U , ~ ~ "a u . , ~ + . . oci Si ned: ~;~ti~ll' E~~UtNEE~ g , cc: _ D:ITRNSMT.PMS : . . . . . . . ~ : . . . J~:~~y~~ . : . . . . . , . . . . , ~ . . . Washingtrn Tnist Dank; 4.i'lu~lb . ~ Z~ wilder SeNlces W0gZ~ 717 H. Sprague Avcnue Spoka,e, WA 99201DE, E D Or TRUS'r !~r~ ~~uf~ 1' ~ ~ X57i~N RECOIIDED tiETUl1N T0: , itsti N ISTknu~ktNi lst yy„4 November iy 96 ,omY iArGrwur. DAM '~'I1d5UAANCE~00~1PNJY~ Cornoratlrn TRtMl~NBOLZ & ROHI~ FCS.1.. 4052A56 ~tKrru•u. . . . r'6 ~WJSrATICPfT27 pige: 10l t • Itrrtia'Rusut'), ur! ihe &ncfK{yy, WASIllli~'TUN TIIUST UANK, i twMxti{ui uryLktei ud uiwinj iwrkr ck Urt d ik uau uy P.esl 12104 Ndm Avenue 11106119% 01;V wuhapantecreia•linler►, ' Spokane, WA 0216. 4C11ft G,'u 1Rl~xtllql, illl ll6 0 f~ B~mwu. ~ ceuidraYw u(ihe inklred„eu knl. rtunl uwl ~fn wu Mrin arve~J.ImnaiMr ~n~u~ wl mrrri ioTNr+rv, i. irw. JI•5011 rhM Pw.cr ot uk. tk IdMrrlnj oncri"CJ~pyrnr 6ryn1 b Ur G.wr d ~kelf e • y,u,~ Washinqton BTATUTORY WARRANTY DEED A portion of the Southeast Qsarter of Sectlrn 19. 12rnabia~25Jbrth t+on2.S_ p9 1 ~~~7~~ 1 45 East, N.M., lying NorUicrly of t•ho following describcd land: / / ' THE GIIANTOR3,1t1CUARD II. JARV19 ncd RVf1S L JA1tV19, Hu'bmC md W,te, dMa JAY A etrlp of lend 35 feat vfde, said 35 foot ntrip of- lnnd cansisting of ~ e 20 foot wide ditch' rlght of xay aloay the nepual atlet of Seltese pryESTMEN7' CpbII+ANy, w lo ao und;rGfad 55% intcrot aod S& D INESfMENTS, LLC. . Lalce, as deacribad and arrveyed by Dead recoid'ug in Book 'A' of Deed9, Page 106, and a 15 foot r+ide strip of leM lyLxg Nartherly to end W„g,;~gtn, j,;m;td I;,bWky Compa„r, vto sn ,s&vided 4596 intve,1; ed jolntng said 20 [oot wide ditdi right of way, as describod and ~'eY~ b1' ~~otded 1n BOO1c 1~7 of Deode, Pege 410, !n the IN CONSIDEMT(ON ofTen Dol4an and athv velmble conaideration; ' SautheAst Qunrter of Saction 19, Ybwnship 25 North, Aange 15 Fas t, 11.H.; • , ln lurid puid, convey and werrmt lo DA1Rd DCVF.lAPMENT, INC. a Washln~~lm Corponiioq D(CfFT exiating County Aoad rlghta-of-uay; Situete !n the Caunry of Spokene, Stete'oe Nashingtm. , • , ' , u~e foQm+ing dexribed ~eal amte, sttuated in t,e Coumy ofSpof~uu, 5tete atWashinglon: • A Paiiaa of lhe 3outhemal Quwlv o! S-dan 19, To++mhip 25 Nortl, Ilna{K 15 P.u1, . . •i W.M..1yine Nortberlr of lbe foumring drocrit,ed Wcd , . . . . . . . . I ~ , 4052457 A strip of 1.n4 35 fect .rWq .aid 35 [oot .~rip of luDd mcatitinC of a 40 (oo► wiAc dikL . h~t: 1 of 1 r;d,l or..y Rloog tbe mturel a,Uec or selkac lalca .1 mo;bca .oa omn7~cd be llaa • ~ilqG1, f IIIE 115 (o I I Jf6/14:b L... :;od in 1100k'A' o( llmf% YACe lOq md n 16 fod Wide eUip of taad ying Norlhviy )ILN SpclLtt W~ u w aod edjoioiog raid 20 loat wide dilrh rigill olvny, u dexribcd md coweyed ly Dad - , . • • ......1ed iu Dook 119 of lkcds, Page 410, ia lhe SouthenA Quarler af Satioe 19, T ~ whkA hai dK alJrec► u! own~hip 25 Nort~ 1tm~e <5 Y.ett, W.M.; . , . i is~m, (cu,l ' Exc~•Yr ~ c«-ty i~d ►~~r.~a,; 960001533 IlKrcln"ITrrApA~kln:u : ~ 1 lSwwwW %pCmkl ' • • ' • p , ' . . Situote 1o Ua Cauolr of 3polcane, Slatc olWeat,ington . Exose Tez Pald on ' , SalB~Pa (9:2.m. , . . g n° ~roas. ~rocEnlr•xwmi.uunc 6, , ...Ms Dow «nmsrwcvtidtj an the propc„r„A ,uC.ficavoL. ligIaL. arp,,,k,atcr% n„a,luunud SUBJEC.TTO: ryufwwruedawwrrue 0+nafnnilwA)ctt.Mrcva.wikrttW !ireolr+ci.w itx lcnkrrocoUcc% " s rydYwamual.«klallkrcurm9. MmWwar&.dEW+wlp{rlkjnMpnlinja4iaqrl%sypcAJninJ wldl6atwimsnuryutwJryulMtuarAk6uewwotmar6aca6cr L 11+LUl1y(orTlea)filnloTnses forla:xcountna661W.OQ2S.• ' k wJr rir yudcJ n wa punuf uW rcd pupenr ur wr imqronoriy& thanxo kwtuJing. ya w;Uot umiiNj: pK tetiffaIilydOr fwFuint 2 LieL'Jlly for fulure &age"menla by ConsoGdaled lrripGon D134kl No, 10. lu8llp4uftli41.dr2L1a9. A9111111,iacLinuiag,rcGigcvw4FsUewlic& wca4pjw"g,tlcrwrudli(ilntaryuurviw,(~wustupryuiryrcN; ' J. lrobilityforfutwedwgnlevieJlrySpokaneCowlyforSlofmlYalcrtetrlce. JJ m1i.A pi~ Jnys caayrruuxti IuJ.6 nwilsurL urwn, eontuiy, Iwub aaJ wi~eE6~wJc: aU lufh~w urne~ ~i~hruhere. • . , a[Atarun in! aeer►pplimc~n: dl py+i~iro4 uEiau uti! r~tlheC~ aa,t ey u„1 aq R~xe„tew+, M{Cf111tNt &OE {uC4YVllliW OHf1C WqA . ~~mt eru! lhe krw ~nd eondlliau lhercof wilh Uu Crsnke, Paeifu Stntu Telephane uyrci w mr wf au d u,r lurrinr, oU of wl~c0 u~ paYcny ~ll h~k~ea,n! w cmuuwc, p,n d ux ~p. md Telegrep~ Company, fer Uu rig~t to ertc~ md tminteL~ polee w~lhia ihc nteea.9ary . , , , wirea end fixturn ltureoq Dated Apr019,1906, Recorded bley 14,1006, wder Iiecorduig .TOSC{UN~Wlcnkrlal~ercNymeduflkinkWedm.e,6k,nlM1~ . 1,r+e~Wnf ~~C 1, 1496 Na 1/2G06. , ~~cain~Mr~'1, ~ n,e rur;r,l wm d'71J0 lilld1Rt71 711IRIF.FN 7110USAND 711ttF£ IIUNDnM M7D b, Faxment nnd thn lerw md mndilions lhereof rrilh lhe Cranke, Millar A. Morivon ►YS7T1Rf* -r-r%AL,, IS 213, 300.00 1, wkb Jnk=KaWSUM W,,~ ft raynrn ulri ata wraa WiLn inKrw ikmn.Jvuuc-d in hu+band of Dorie Morrison dwling in hu Kpnrele properlY, and Itarry A. biorrisoM . .m.JmGca.i~w~way~he~ccurityufduclkeJufTro~;Ihl~hepcrfumwredJ+rrore,w,~„dq,KUU„uofllarmrcnc~rcinanu'u~nt: ~ llusband of Cloyde bL Norrimioq dczliny in hia kperale properly, for lLe purpose of a Irliherc~nyu,auufwyfuKweatrx,i','wuAinkrn+~hnanwylcw~IkAnu.rrby LerOkrRvw,du,rw,Enp6=llranltknin•t~uurc perpetuel righlq(wey eaxmenl lo ~urvey, coro4u~t, operak, irupee~ meL~tnu4 nnd , Ad.awc: xwidw RwrpKn WLm ilrrwxi Of the oei;yU;N,a;,kaCd„W,k „heac„dun,,.im4,m,,filei or,;,,,narcti.criJrireJbrw nmo.e awekr pipeGne ar wnduit end appurknenw lherelo, Dnled Oclobcr 1, lOGS, . ~"la IleeurJcd petolxr Y'1, 1006, unJer Hocordiiq Na 11D001iC. ~ dw YQ YIY PY\I1ra'Y6pl, rykMM~ll, 1elKw7k W Ifrl.rnr1W. 44 ..W i~aw~rwi~1 t+ 0. Agrecnunt .nd Uw krtns W1d W71tLlI0M lI1CJC0r, ntC01'OCE AUQWI 3, 1D95, under apn«nrn►'ine ".WU14AuttiK„~~,r~w~~~, ,,ac uri4rM4 ueri Itaording NaD5080JOll6,RcMdinelheSewerConttailonAerctmentbtlwcen3pokono ' Uu~o.ac,wnw~AaUunm~er4pvlully~cnnt~Jdkewiehrrckry~uavtpnl~nllu~drriKluwEntwwnleonrryUrMqtnY.~A~ ' ~~1y,11eptans,andDalwDevelopmenl,Lx,vnlhLetccomerPro+viam. . ~kHu~wryieuneoc~.J~ao1.~+,JihrrUknu.tir•illrrnuiwJUrknJse+enllrdoewkaiklti,l'n+9apinuaIleuiw.uJdenuatr,wnjnl . ~ ~ • . , ~ ► +wu.c..,,.,uartvrinL~G~nlin~KieJukut~urry3wuwco.rn~ctn+ariUklawnrcepulk7iruurin~ln~dcr'.ia~.m • i. u,e wy~nr. r; Dated ►hL ,1ST, dey of ,ZOYEM13ER 1090. ' , . ' ~f ` . ' • i JAY aIVESThiGNT COMPANY ' • , . . . . . • ' • , I L ' . ~ • • ' ~ . • 'i , ~ ~ 1 ' ~.c-c~ An.ri,' ~ , . ~ a . , • ' . , . ~ • , , ' ' " IUCHARD ll. JAR~~N~]$qq''''' JIUT~Ei L JAHYLS . " . . • 4 Oi~~tlifv.o4ryM~w~~ ~ . . ~ //JJ/''''/ ' , . I . , ~ ~ ~,r• . • . . . . . . ' ' • ; , . . . ' • , . . , ~ ••I . ~p ~ ~ ' f "-ti. TR.ANSNATION TITLE INSUR.ANCE COMPANY ,~f J NORTH 7 2 O ARCOrn~rE r~ SPOKANE,' WASHINGTON 99212 Prepared f or : DAffiM DEVELOPMENT Order No.: ME210 0 8 2 ATTN; RICt3ARD DAHM E. 12720 NOR.A - STE. D . cc : Inland Paci f ic Engineering t , P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E ~ Dated July 3, 1997 at 8:00 a.m. Certificate for filing Plat of : TURTLE CREEK FIRST ADDITION. In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit: That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Southeast quaxter; thence . South 8904611211 East, along the North line of said Southeast quarter a distance of.2-00.00 feet; thence South 00013148" West, a distance of , 25.00 feet to the South right of way line of Eighth Avenue and True Point of Beginning; thence South 8904611211 East, along said South right of way line, a distance of 2426.20 feet to the Westerly right of way . line of Barker Road; thence South 00000'00" West, along said Westerly right of way line, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence North 89046'12" West, a distarice of 2051.67 feet; thence South 75026128" West, a distance of 129.28 feet; thence South 00013148" West, a distance of 65.00 feet; thence North 53025101" West, a distance of 155.21 feet; thence North 61056110" West, a distance of 141.35 feet; thence North 00013148" East, a distance of 55.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Washington corporation. Page 1 oi 3 . . ~ • - c . , . . . . e• . . . l, . Order -No . ME210082 EXCEPTIONS: .1. Taxes and assessments, if any, . no search having been -made thereof,. as to Parcel No*. 55194.9025. • Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the company. Said parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the company makes no assurance as to validity'or accuracy relating thereto. . . 2. Liability to future assessments by Consolidated Irrigation District.No. ~ 19. 3. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: - GRANTEE: Pacific States Telephone. and Telegraph Company PURPOSE: The right to erect, and maintain poles within the necessary wires and fixtures thereon DATED: April 19, 1906 RECORDED: May 14, 1906 RECORDING NO.: 142606 4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Millar A. Morrison, husband of Doris Morrison, dealing in his separate property, and Harry A. Morrison, husband of Cloyde M. Morrison, dealing in his separate property PURPOSE: A perpetual right-of-way easement to survey, construct, operate, inspect, maintain, and remove a water pipeline or conduit and appurtenances thereto DATED: October 1, 1965 . RECORDED: October 22, 1965 ° RECORDING NO.: 149968C - 5: AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: August 3, 1995 RECORDING NO.: 9508030115 REGARDING: Sewer Connection Agreement between Spokane County, Heptons and Dahm Development, Inc., with Latecomer . Provisions 6. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GR.ANTOR: Dahm Development, Inc., a Washington corporation TRUSTEE: Transnation Title Insurance Company BENEFIC•IARY: Washington Trust Bank , ORIGINAL AMOLTNT: $213, 300 . 00 DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4052457 Page 2 o f. 3 - . ~ , ' • . ' ~ ; r• . Order No. ME210082 7. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Dahm Development, Inc., a Washington corporation TRUSTEE: Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a Washington corporation BENEFICIARY: R-ichard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, Husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investment Company, as to an undivided 55o interest; and S& B Investments, ' L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 45o interest ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $140,000.00 F DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4052458 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:. BY AGREEMENT DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4052459 The above Deed of Trust was made subordinate to the Deed of Trust recorded under Recording No. 4052457, set forth at paragraph 5 herein. 8. NOTICE OF OPTION AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: OPTIONOR: Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investments, as to an undivided 5501 interest and S& B Investments, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 450 interest OPTIONEE: Meridian Investments., L.L:C'-. , a Washington . Limited Liability Compariy PROPERTY: Turtle Creek , DATED: . November 5, 1996 . RECORDED: November 18, 1996 RECORDING NO.: 4055408 ' END OF EXCEPTIONS TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY . B Y % C <<: L' . • For service on this order call: (509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519 Micki Erwin, Title Off icer Enclosure: Paragraphs 3 - 8 Sketch sc . : "1 . Page 3 of 3 } ' ' , N017CE OP OFT70N , . . • IIE 11' KNOWN L}wt an Option for the purc}NSe of reel property hes been given na fo0ows: -L12 . , • , OPTIONOII RiCHAItll B. JAItV15 end IiU1'ti L JAliVTS, Hwband end Wife, dlble JAY INVES'I'MgNTS, na to en undihded rifty five percent (66%) nnd S & B INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., A Weehington llmlted Liability Compeny, ee lc en undivided forty Gve percrnt intereat (4596), OPTIONEE: . 4055408 ; MEREDwN INVESTMExTs. Lc.c., A ryaehi„gton Lia,lted LL,bility Page; 2 012 ; Comvanr ; 11118119% a:zsp 4 P1lOFEti'IY: • 1RU'SNI110N~ 1 I~ I~S f4 N ;9.4 Spotu~t to, u TU~E CREEK, (See euached ExluLit 'A' which u incocpornted , hereW, September 25, 1996 i EPPECI7VE DATE , November S, iees. ' LEGAL DESCRIP'I'JON i DATED thiT ~ dey of November,lAflB. The Soulheast Quarter and the East 330,00 fal of the Norih Half ot thc Soulhwest Quartcr, ail in SxGon 19, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., ' OPTIONOR- I EXCF.PT that portion lying within county road right of way; ~ JAY INVFS7'►,{gNT'S ALSO ~J(CEPT that poction conveyod to Spokane County by InstNment recordod Octoba 2, s& B wvESTME~, 1974 under Auditor's Documcnt No. 7410020196; ' . C-/-~ AiSO EXCEFT astrip'of land 35 fxt in wfdth in the Sautheatt Quartu and the F.ast 330.00 , ~exn~tn B. JnRVIs B~" fal o( the Norih Half oi the Soulhwest Quarter, all in Sxtion 19, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., ( said strip lying 10 fcet soulherly and 25 !at northerly from the following ducribod , centuline: &ginning at a point on the eulerly line of said Southeut Quuter which bears nU~'H L JNIVi$, py Aic~„ud B. ~,u„~ i,« ' P4ig0400 S.00000'40'E, a Jislance of 1173,52 ftel from the NorWeasl Corner of said Soulhaut nttorney in ~ntt r, 1 al t Quazter, thence N.67'22'34'W, a distance o! 131.57 f~et; thence N.68'56'59'W. a h;~sKU M. I Ilt !Ns co N fo,~ ~ot;~e u distance of 75.50 feet; thence N.70°26'53'W. a distance of 102.89 fat; thcnce ~ srn'rE oF SvnStm,tcTON ) N.73'37'08'W, a distance of 183.78 fcet; lhcnce N.74'49'00'W, a distana of . 921.87 fxt; thence N.64042136'W. a dislance af 112.93 fxl; thence N.60°02'20'W. ~ts~ or s~o~,~ ~ On thu day personnlly appeued beCore me RICHARD ' B, dhRylS, to me Icnown la be the individunl descriLed in a distance of 246.08 fal; lhence N.75° 10' 19'W, a dislance of ,121,07 fat; thence nnd who e=ecuted the within and forcgoing instnunent, for ItiruseU and e1so y Atlomty in Fnct for RUTH L. JAItVIS, N.63 0117 w, a distance ot 135.69 fxt; thence N.65S0'07 W, 2 di11211CC Of and ecknowledged t}at he eigned the earoe ee hie free nnd volw" eet aad dced rar himseUand als, y her (rce and 121.14 fttt; thenee N.62' 12155'W, a dislanep of 118,99 fett; thenct N.56'35'34'W. ~ `'0lu^ta7 act snd deed av Altorney in Fact far enid principal !or the ush and slatrd thet lhe Powu of Altorne Pu~e thercin mentioned, end on oeLh , ; a distance o( 56.78 Cte1; lhence N.37 Ol 52 W. a disiance of 94,25 ttel; thenCe principnl is now G,ring er~d ia not'~~horaing the ezeculion oi thu irutrument }sas not been rcvoked and • id N.42 14 40 W. a distance af 56,21 feet; thence N.S4 35 33 W, a distance o[ 53.02 ,1+OIVE11sl~~der m ~ Y of NOVEMBER Y~nd °'~d °fiic'°j r~'1° ~ ,1988. fat' ~ thence N.61'27'42'W, a dislance of 70.92 fxt' ~ thmce N.59'09'47W, a ° ~ J. ~o . distance of 92.02 fut; thence N.55.37'5 1.W, e disLance of 101.30 fat; lhence N.58'01'27"W. a dislance of 101.62 fal; lhenco N.60'30'57`W, a distance o( 71.45 NOTARY ~9~~ ~~~•K- 1~. ; Notnry pubGc far h6 State of feel lo the north line af uid East 330,00 ket of the North half of the Sau(hwctl • } PUBl1C ' 2: w6dhingi°N ReeidinQ in: o-~, ~~rc~or.fJ Quarter, being the terminus poinl of thi: centerline description, which terminus poinl co . ~i9J'7L . ~0 ~ Y ~11mie.71o11lzp'vee: , ~-/-.{U00 b e a r a N. 8 9•d 7'3 7rW. a d i s t a n c e o f 35.51 f a l f rom t h e C e n l e f 1/4 C o m e r o f s a i d . ,*F• ~ Section 19; the sidclines of uid strip being ezlendcd or shorlcncd to mat [fic" ~fi wAS westerly margin of IIuker Road and said north lino of aaid East 330.00 feet of the STATE OF IVA$t{(NCTpN ) Nor1h Half of the Soulhwcsl Quarier, )a& ' Caunty of Spokene ) Situate in the Caunly of Spokane, Stale of Washinglon "X' • On lhis l/-dny of November, 1996, bt(ore me, the ondersigned,'e No1ary PubGc in uid for lhe SLale of ~Y~~a~ d~y ro~~iuioned pnd eworrti per~y np~&pd T~~^ ~rr,'s , to me known lo be tlie ' 77?,~s „j.~ ot S, fl{ /„vr,y~,.,,f.r tLe limiled liebilit mm (oregoint uixtrumrnt, nnd ec{unowfedgtd the eaid irulnunent to Lu the Gee end volun Y pany tjAt execuled the tary . (or the usee nnd,Piupwes lh«fl{~ meniloned, and oe oeth stekd thnl he wns eulhori:ed etecute lhe usid 'wtnunpen4 CiVEN iilid`,'~CWk~ eenl the day and yeer wl ebove written. ° • SSiONF y~0 NOTARY No tary Public if, d,a (dr the stete or ~:I ~ Z• tiVluhin6tm rexid'nB'in N ~1`r.s ~rc~t n~fS PUBUC MY Comnission £zp'vn: A~ ; . . ':a . E 1/4 CORNER SEC 19-25-45 , ~ 8TH AVQIUE 1 1 ! b ~ S 1 I I 7 ~ 1 p 7 4 -H ~ . . „ PARCEL "8" OFF-SITE EASEMENT I I PARCEL "A" OFF-SITE EASEMENT I I - I I II I II ~ ~ . SCALE: 1 "=200' INLAND TURTLE CREEK PHASE .1 PACiFic ENQINEERIN4 OFF-SITE EASEMENTS, PARCELS "A" 8c "B" 707 West 7lh - Suite 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE: 10/22/97 / ` Spokane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844, ` ~ ACTION: S SCREEN: ANFO USERID: INQ ASSESSOR'S INFORMATION DATA SCREEN JURISDICTION= 11 YR= 98 ROLL= RE PARCEL= 55194.9061 OWNER ~ DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC. ~ FIELD BOOK: 00265 RGE STREET ~ 12720 E NORA AVE #D ( ACO: AS 97-0384 ADDRESS ~ SPOKANE WA 99206 ~ ACTV: STAT: A I I EXMP: EXMO: SITUS ~ 000000 ADDRESS UNKNOWN . ~ ADDO: N SASS: N ADDRESS ~ GRE TAX DISTRICT: TD1400 ~ PROP: 9100 LEGAL: 19-25-45 SE1/4 LYG N OF NLY BOUNDARY OF SALTESE DRAINAGE DITCH EXC RD R/W ASMT: TOTAL MKT-LD CLS-LD BLDG-1 OTHER 0/R METHOD BOE/SBTA: A FINAL ASMT: 33,000 33,000 0 0 0 N $EXEMPTIONS: 0 TAXABLE: 33,000 SALE- lo: 9601 5331 DATE: 11 01 96 INST: WD TRAN: 0 PRICE: 140,000 SALE- 1%: 9500 4723 DATE: 03 14 95 INST: QC TRAN: 0 PRICE: 0 1 ~ ACTION: S SCREEN: ANFO USERID: INQ ASSESSOR'S INFORMATION DATA SCREEN JURISDICTION= 11 YR= 98 ROLL= RE PARCEL= 55194.9062 ~ OWNER ~ DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC. ~ FIELD BOOK: 00265 RGE STREET ~ 12720 E NORA AVE #D ~ ACO: AS 97-0384 ADDRESS ~ SPOKANE WA 99206 ~ ACTV: STAT: A I ~ EXMP: EXMO: SITUS ~ 001100 S BARKER RD ~ ADDO: N SASS: N ADDRESS ~ GRE TAX DISTRICT: TD1400 ~ PROP: 1100 LEGAL: 19-25-45 SE1/4 LYG S OF NLY BOUNDARY OF SALTESE DRAINAGE DITCH EXC RD R/W . ASMT: TOTAL MKT-LD CLS-LD BLDG-1 OTHER 0/R METHOD BOE/SBTA: A FINAL ASMT : 168,600 93,800 0 73,600 11200 N $EXEMPTIONS: 0 TAXABLE: 168,600 SALE- 10: 9601 5331 DATE: 11 Ol 96 INST: WD TRAN: 0 PRICE: 140,000 SALE- 10: 9500 4723 DATE: 03 14 95 INST: QC TRAN: 0 PRICE: 0 . • t ~ - , 4158044 . Pa e; 1 of 4 . . . . . • ~ ` ~ ~ ~ y 11 ~Q4i.991 42 ; 43P , CO ENG EAS $0.40' Sookane Co. WA After Recordirig Return'To:' Spolcacie County Engincer Attu.: Rigltt of tiVay llcpat•tmc»t . . _ . . . - . , . - Document Title: Drainage Easement Grantor(~s): DAHM, DEVELOPMENT, A WASHINGTON CORPOFtATION ' , Grantee: Spoka»e County ~ Legal Description: PTN. OF SE J, SEC. 19, TWN. 2 5N, RG. 45 EAST, W. M. ' Additional Legal Description: See Page 1&•3 _ v Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(k}: 55194 . 9061 , Reference Number: " . Log In Date: 10-28-97 Requested by: - BI31,L Fj • Prepared by: RM Purpose: P 1753 RF No(x).: 2058 Road Name(s): BEIGE & GREENACRES RDS. , ;'e- • . ~ . , ' ' . . C COUNI'Y DIVISION Or GNGINLERING - SPOK~IN. . . , . . . Spokane.,County, WaSI1111gt011 . . . ,DRAINAGE EASEMENT-.. , . , IN THE MA,rI LR OT BETGE AND GREENACRES ROADS u No. 2058 , , . y_ . _ . . . , . :t ' " • KNOW ALL MEN BY I'HLSL I'KESEN't'S, tliat tlie Grantor(s), DAHM DEVELOPMENT, a , , , ' . . Washington Corporation . - - - , - - -of the County of Spokane, State of Wasliington, for and iil consideration of Mutual Benefits, the ` receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, grant(s) to Spokane County, a political subdivision of . the State of Washington, a Drainage Easement over, under, upon and across the following described real property situated in the County of Spokatle, State of Washiiigton: AFF'EC1'S ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(IR).: 55194 . 9061 . . . . , . < . . . SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION MARKED AS ATTACHMENT "A" R. E ise Tax Cxe pt Dato: 19 _ Sp04 n ou r er tiy: . , . The Drainage Easeinellts, as ciescribed hereinabove are for the purpose of installing, operating . and maintaining drainage areas and- clrainage facilities to dispose af ruiioff. The groperty owner shall inaintain tlie dt•aiilage area witli a permalient live cover of dryland type grasses acceptable to the office of the Spokane Coujity Division of Engineering, witli oplional slixubbery and/or trees, which do not obstruct the flow and percolation of storm drainage water in the dr.ainage area as indicated by the approved plans: , 11~~~'. 4158044 J e; af 4 ~ 1110511997 4i,,43P - Go ENG EAS $0.00 Sonkane Co..lyA T'lle Grantor(s) will coilstruct the draitiage facilities in conformaiice with the approved plans on file iil the olfice of the Spokane County Division of Engineering. The inclividual lot owners or tlleir successors in interest shall maintain the drainage facilities in co»formance wilh the approved p11ns. The property owner or llis represeiltative sliall inform eacli succeeding rurchaser of all Drainage Easeinents oil the pi-opel-ty and liis responsibility for maintaiiling cirainage facilities within said Easements. The Drainage Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modif cation of the boundaries o(' said Lasement caii be made witllout the prior approval of Spokane County. - ~ f Wlieilever the iiiciividual lot owners or their successors iil interest fail to maintain the drainage facilities iii coiiformailce witli ilie approved Drainage Plan, 'a notice will be given 'to the ~ individual lot owners or their successors in interest by the Coullty. If not corrected after ten (10) days, the County has the right to correct the maintenance failure or have it corrected at the expense or the iiidividual lot owiiers or their successors in interest. . Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of lliaintaining the drainage course on private lots witliin Drainage Easements or floodpldin areas, nor the responsibility for any drainage wllatsoever, iilcluding but not liiliited to inverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maiiitenaelce of drainage courses in Drainage Easements on private property. This Drainage Easenient will terminate at such time the described areas are platted. IN WITNESS WI--IEREOF, I have hereunto set MY hand(X) and seal($) this .V*4 day of Yovfoo iP*A , 1997 . D?AiSQI) DEVELOPMENT., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION ~~'[~ZG L'G~G.~._ . , • , . _ . , • By. ~ By: RIC~ARD DAHM, PRESIDENT ' ~ ' - • ' - STATE OF WASI-IING'1'ON ) . COUNri'Y OF SI'UKnNI: ) ss I certify that 1 know or liave satisfactary eviclence tliat RICHARD DAHM - (is/$m) the indiviciual(s) wlio appeared before me, ancl saicl inclividual(x) aeknowledgecl that (he/~W23* signed this instrumecit, on oalil slatecl that (he/k=A" (wasiAWH) authorized to execute the instcvinent ancl acknowledgecl it as the PRESIDENT Of DAHM DEVELOPMENT to be the free ancl voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. ~ . Dated this clay of A/0Yf /K it~` , 1997 . . : , ; ~ . . . . . h~ . E~~'~:•. .E : , ..i.l~ ' ,,..-~~~,r:GToN Np'~ R PUBLIC In ancl for the State of,Washington, M; c%)U,1;,1, -11 41. . 2001 resicling at Spoka»e. My appoinlment expires . rwfon»s\ilolice lo public C cor}) notary\bc y ~ . . r , ' , ' ~ ~141~1 4158044 , . . a- . . . . . e; Pa 3of4 , • . , . I .f.; 11~0511997 02;43P CO ENG EAS $0.00 Spokane Co, WA . ATTACHMENT "A" u ' ' ♦ . . PARCEL "A" THAT portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, T.25 N., R.45 E., W.M., County of Spokane, State of Washington described as follows: . Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 19; thence N.8904611211W. along the north line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 560.10 feet;' thence S.00013' 98"W.-.a distance of 190.00 feet to the TRUE . POINT:OF BEGINNING of said description; thence S.89°46'12"E. a distance of 32.84 feet; thence S. 00°13' 14 "W. a distance of 27 . 00 feet; thence N.89°46'12"W. a distance of 59.00 feet; thence N.00013148"E. a distance of 27.00 feet; thence S.89°46'12"E., a distance of 26.16 feet to the True Point of Beginning; • . PARCEL "B" THAT portion of the Southeast Quarter of Section 19, T.25 N., . R'.45 E., W.M., County of*Spokane, State of Washington described . as follows : ' ~ . . , Beginning at the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of said.Section 19; thence N.89°46'12"W, along the north line of said Southeast Quarter a distance of 1296.10 feet; thence S.0001314811W. a distance of 140.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OE' BEGINNING of said description; thence . S.8904611211E. a distance of 34.83 feet; thence S.00013114"W. a distance oF 25.00 feet; thence _ N.89°46'12"W. a distance of 65.00 feet; thence N.00013148"E. a distance of 25.00 feet; thence S.89°46'12"E. a distance of 30.17 feet to the True Point of eeginning; . . _ - - ~ • ~ . a.. . ~ • . ~ N Q ~Gn U . GO ~ •-l4) ~ r O E 1 4 CORNER SEC 19-25-45 . . - I o I I I I I I I . - I ~ I I - - " - - - _ ~ I I 9TH AvEuE - ~ ~ . - - - - i 6 . i T ~ f _ Y I 4 II 3 . ~ II ~ . ► ~ . - I q~^p r+~CEL 8 OFF-S1TE ~AStti~EN E ~ PARCEL nAn OFr=-SITF EAScI~ NT - E - . ~ , . II ~ W . ~ . Y . I . . I • , I I ' . • . ~ t • . ' . • ~ ' ` . ` J ~ . ~ . . . , . SCALE: 1 "=200' ► ~ ' . c-'~ _ . , 02i17/19?8 d 12a42PM I :ECLIPT # 214653 I Znd Floor ' ~;P1OKANE r.auN 'rY ~ ` A U D I T 0 R ~ ' S P b', K ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 U N 'T `r ~ U A ~iage Declaration of Covenant , ~ FROM q ru ENGINLERS hc., a Washington Corporation ~Y : =NFABLE ~The Public ` ~~~E NOo o41ssz12 # Fgz SE 1/4, Section 19, Townslup 25* North, Range 45 Doc.A t caV 7 coVE~~NT cNo c~A'KcEi ';Additzon " ~~CUMENfi FEEa 9p00 55194.9025 1 TflTAL NQ GMARGE FEE 9.90 ~-94 : i ' TOTAL REGORDINJ FEE 9. 0m, cane County of Turtle Creek First Addition liereinaftcr rcferred to ; I d agrees that: CNANK i nts are hereby granted the right to ingress and egress to, over and U ECEaPrkhe purposes of inspection and emergency inaintenance of drainage .r her drainage facilities, if not properly maintained by the properiy k S ~ e-.. ~t the responsibility to inspect or maintain drainage facilities locatcd outside ' of`publicrights-oi-'way, except in cases where Spokane County specifically assumes that responsibility in writing. Neither does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by fihe property o;=,Jner(s) ±o proredy xn?irztair_ sucn arels. ' . The property owncrs wifihul this plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface . path of nafiural or man-made drainage flow over a.nd across their respective properties. If the propei-ty owners fail to maultain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or drainage facilities on private properties, a notice of such failurc may be given to the property owner. rf uot corrected within.the period indicatcd on said notice, Spoka.ne County has the right to correct the mainteiiauce failure, or have it corrccted, at thc expense of the property owncr. Spokane County docs not accept the responsibility of maintaii~lg the drainagc course on private lots or floodplain areas within private lots, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoevcr, iucluding, but not limitcd to, uiverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or maintenance of drainage courses in drainage easements on private property. Any building that is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such an elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage entry point to the building (including but not linuted to a window well, a window unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positivc drainage shall consist of a inulimum slope of 3% away from tlie building for a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. The lots sliall Ue graded so that either a) aU nuloff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a na±ural, drainage stivale o: apgroved d: 4nabe facility, or b) dra:nagc- iltc; cep ted on the lat is disposed of on tlie lot in asi approved drainage facility. All draunage facilities for this plat, including ariy `208' swales, shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at tlie Spokane County Engincer's Off cc. Any proposcd changes to the approved road and drainage plans must be approved by the Spokane County Eugi~lcer's Officc prior to coilstniction of said cllanges. Thcc-e may ex.ist properties locatEd uplull and adjacent to this subdivision wWch perio~dically dischargc stormwater runoff onto individual lots withui tlus plat. Stormwater i-unoff fi-om nearby uphill propcrties sliould be expecCed, c-uid during snow melt periods or wet seasons the lots niay be subjected to lvgher ainounts of stormrvater ruiloff that what is normally obseivcd or witicipatcd. Because stoi-mwater runoff . ~ . . ~ ~ • from adjacent properties have discharged onto this plat prior to development, stormwater runoff will likely contunue to do so a:fter development. The property owners within this plat shall maintain all water quality swales ("208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on their respective properties, a.nd any portion of a"208' swale situated in a public right- of-way adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified in the cunrently approved and accepted plans on file at Spokane County's Engineer's Office. No structures, including fences, shall be constructed directly over or within a`208'swale witliout the expressed written consent of the Spokane Cowlty Engineer. Spokane County docs not accept tlie responsibility to inspect and/or nlaintaun the drauiage easements or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for auy failure by the lot owtier(s) to properly maintain such areas. This covcnailt and agreement shall run with the la.nd in perpetuity, and shall be binduig upon the owner, their heirs, successors and assigns, including the obligation to participate ui the maintcnance of the drainage facilities as provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, fihe undersigned has caused this uistnunent to be executed on this day of 1997. DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Washington Corporation ) ~ . Rich rd Dalun, Presid ) STATE OF WASMNGTON ) COUN1'Y OF SPOKANE )ss I certify that I know or have satisfactory cvidcnce that Richard Dahm - is thE person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this . instrument, on oath stated that,h was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of 11~ . to be a free and voluntary act of such pacty for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: l - 3 0 " ``g~1t11111l1~j . ~ ~ ~ • e ~ . ~oion FL~'~~~i~ °~O ~ ~ Nota Public lil and for the State of v ~;pTAR y TV, ~ lY - ' • - Washington. - oo / ~c!>•. s PU81-1G My Appointment ExpirES: y OF.. .5; n [I 'C • ~ 7 ' ~ . . { ( , Office of the County Engineer Spokane County, Washington 6 January 1998 To: From: Development Engineering Services, Bill Hemmings, P.E. RE: Please note : The Drainage Declaration of Covenant is to be signed by the Title Owner's. Please submit the signed Declaration of Covenant to the County Engineer's Office. The County will record the document. Please note that the County Assessor's Office has strict requirements on document size and margins. The Declaration of Covenant will need to adhere to these requirements. An electronic copy of the Covenant is available upon request. Plat Dedication Drainage easements, as platted and shown hereon, which are for the purposes of installing, operating and maintaining drainage ponds and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff, are hereby granted to Spokane County and the public. The drainage easements, lots and tracts are subject to the separate Declaration of Covenant as recorded under Auditor's Document No. which by reference is made a part hereof. Development within this plat shall conform to the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program, and Chapter 3.20 of the Spokane County Code. The• lowest floor, including basement floor, for any structure shall be constructed according to the requirements of the Spokane County Flood Zone regulations in effect at the time a building permit is issued. Purchasers of property in this subdivision are warned of possible flooding or ponding and the potential requirement to purchase Flood Insurance. This warning shall be carried in every deed drawn to transfer ownership of any and all property within this plat in the Area of Special Flood hazard. Spokane County does not accept any responsibility whatsoever to establish or . maintain ingress or egress across the flood plain area. ~ AFTER 1tECOItDING RETURN TO: Spokane County Public Works Development Engineering Services, 2nd Floor 1026 W. Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260-0170 Document Title: Drainage Deciaration of Covenant Gra.ntor: Dahm Developm.ent, Yn.c., a Washington Corporation Grantee: Spokane County and The Public AbUreviated Lega1 Description: SE 1/4, Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., Turtle Creek First Addition Assessor's Tax Parcel Numbers: 55194.9025 County Reference Na. PE-1753-94 In consideration of the approval by Spokane County of Turtle Creek Tirst Addition hereina.fter rcferred to as the "plat"), undersigned covenants arid agrees that: Spokane County and its authorized agcnts are hereby granted thE right to ingress and egress to, over and from all public drainage easements for the purposes of inspection and emergency maintenance of drainage swales, ponds, ditcbes, culverts and other drainagE facilities, if not properly maintained by the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility to inspect or mainta.in drainage facilities located outsidE of public rights-of-way, except in cases where Spokane County specifically assumes that responsibility ui writing. Neither does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the property owner(s) to properly maintain such areas. The property ownErs within tlus plat shall be held responsible for keeping open and maintaining the surface path of na.tural or man-ma.de drainage flow over and across their respective properties. If the property owners fail to maintain the surface path of natural or man-made drainage flow, or drainage facilities on private properties, a notice of such failure may be given to the property owner. If aot corrected within the period indicated on said notice, Spokane County has the right to correct the maintenance failure, or have it corrected, at the expense of the property owner. Spokane County does not accept the responsibility of maintain.ing the drainage course on private lots or floodplain areas witluu private lots, nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever, i.ncluding, but not limited to, i.nverse condemnation to any properties due to deficient construction and/or mauitenance of drainage courses ui drainage easements on private property. . Asiy building that is constructed on a lot in this plat shall be set at such au elevation so as to provide positive drainage away from any drainage cntry point to the building (including but not limited to a window well, 1 wi.ndow unprotected by a window well, or a doorway). Said positive drainage shall consist of a minimum slope of 3% away from the building for a distance of at least 10 fect from the building. The lots sha.ll be graded so that eitYier a) all runoff is routed away from the building, and conveyed over the lot to a natural drainage swale or approved drainage facility, or b) drainage intercepted on the lot is disposed of on the lot in an approved drainage facility. All drainage facilities for this plat, including auy `208' swales, shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans on file at the Spokane County Engineer's Office. Any proposed changes to the approved road and drainage plans must be approved by the Spokane ti County Engineer's Office prior to construction of said changes. , ThEre may exist properties located uphill and adjacent to this subdivision which periodically discharge stormwater runoff onto individual lots within this plat. Stormwater runoff from nearby uphill properties should be expected, and during snow melt periods or wet seasons the lots may be subjected to higher amounts of stormwater runoff that what is normally observed or anticipated. Because stormwater runoff . -e from adjacent properties have discharged onto this plat prior to development, stormwater runoff NArill likely continue to do so after development. The property owners within this plat shall ma.intain all water quality swales ("208" swales) and drainage ditches situated on their respective properties, and any portion of a`208' swale situated in a public right- of-way adjacent to their respective properties, with a permanent ground cover as specified in the currently approved and accepted plans on file at Spokane County's Engineer's Office. No structures, including fences, shall be constructed directly over or within a`208'swale without the expressed written consent of . the Spokane County Engineer. Spoka.ne County does not accept the responsibility to inspect and/or mainta.in thE drainage easements or drainage swales, nor does Spokane County accept any liability for any failure by the lot owner(s) to properly mauitain such areas. This covcnant and agreement shall run with the land in perpetuity, and shall be binding upon the owner, their heirs, successors and assigns, including the obligation to participate in the maintenance of the drainage facilities as provided herein. IN VVrTNESS WHEREOF, the undcrsigned has caused this instrument to be eYecuted on this day of 1997. DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Washington Corporation Richard Dahm, President ) STATE OF WASHINCTON ) COUNTY OF SPOK:.ANE )ss I certify that T know or have satisfactory evidence that Richard Dahm is the person who appeared before me, a.nd said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath sta.ted that he was authorized to execute the instrwnent and acknowledged it as thE of to be a free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: Notary Public In and for the Sta.te of Washington. My Appointment Expires: SEP-24-1997 12:22 INLAND PACIFIC ENG - P.01 INIAND PACIFIC ErIGINEERING 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200 Spokane, VVA 99204 . Telephone: (509) 458-6840 FAX: (509) 458-6844 FAx TRAvsMr~TAL DATE: 3-,+ Cl~ rIO.OF PAGES: 2 (inctuding covei page) . • TO: 0 FAX ~ COMPANY: ctn PHONE r FROM: T~ • JoB ~ PROJEC'I NAME: ORYGLNAL IN MAIL: ❑ YE,S ❑ NO NOTES: C16j?" Tyi a1 YL &,c,c v ' . c,o 6v-e.-~ . . ~ . RZ-y, 5/97 , 0AF0RMS1FaXSIiEET.WPD . -k~ , SEP-24-1997 12:22 INLAND PACIFIC ENG ~ P.02 Weshiagw o Wster Povi , • ~ ~ ~j ~ ~ ~ ~ 'w' 1411 East Mission . P.O. 8ox 37n Spokane, Washinqton 5.W.20-3727 CCD ~ 9 9~ 1 8D0-727-917Q JCr 509 489-(1.5D0 Telsphone 0P.E. Washingtan WeterPower FPWU ~oea September 22, 1997 cC: li~t 1n~ Billie J. Spatling ~ Inland Pacific Engineering Inc. 707 W. 7th. Suite 200 - Spokaae Wa 99204 ~ RE: Turtle Greek First Addition Dear Billie; In referencc to the above mentioned plat The Washiagtoa Water Power Company requires no easements ot6er than those showa and platied thereon. Washiagton Water Power Compauy does however, Tequest the following dedication language be added to th.is piat. Please notE addendtim to normal dedictioa. "Utility easements s6own on there here[n described p[at are hereby dedicated to the secying utility companies for the construction, reconstructian, maintenance and operation of utilities together with the right to inspect said utilities and to trim and or remove trees which may interfere with the constraction, maintenance and operation of same, together with the right to access ssid utility eesernen ts through an "Future Right of Way Acqnisition" ~ a s~~ ~ rein. IqNy E~ sE 1Y~.eN75 U~ R t ~,~k 4~s ~~2~- ~D ~r2~ujG, ,~Iic, y tv7"v2~ 5 f- W~ /4c yv/s ~-io,vs A/?~ ~ If u+e can be of further assistance, please contact rne at 482-8536. ~S h4 ll ,4j5l~ (.)/'va rv T'hank You. SvCA ~ ~ms-f-,oA•d l~~=,?S he cv/hi41 pVbl-lc 5 ~ $7 Pauicia Aikins Administrative Assistant enclosure CC: Spokene County Planning . l : t~~ 4_.. t, ~ ~~,ti_•y , 4 4 a, ~y . . ~ ~ FAX COVER ST-EE IAI SPOK:ANE COL1NTY ENGINEERS 1026 W BROADWAY SPOKANE, WA 99260 R A R~ FAX # 15` Floor 324-7655 Phone 456-3600 SPO~.~ Cou,\UY DATE: '~1-3o -97 Department of Public Works Engineering Division Number Of Pages (Including Cover Sheet): _ TO: Z?- j FAX#: Z/ 4-1 ~ ~ caNrnANY: CYTY / STATE: FROM: ~ Department: -2!-:/11G1 ✓ MES SAGE / SPECIAL INSTRUCTI0N: /t/7 (1 ~ Ra.sCJ )2/U ~ 12 /,!j 1,79) z2fj-' ~S<< ca /2 LA:,S6 /J1 6qvt ~ ,4 , r"wC! ~ l 64tn c/ btfr 76c ~ ~t Ti(~~9-y / / T i ~lY,(T Ci tb%R l: • 0e, ~z. . ~ • . . . • ' . . ~ r r - ' r • . . . _ . - - _ PM Jpg# , . • CC: Lfst tniNats ~ ' '~r • ' TRANSN,ATION TITLE INSUrRANCE COMPANY NORTH 7 2 0 ARGONNE SPOKANfi, WASHINGTON 99212 . . . ~ . Prepared €or : DAHM DEVFLOPMENT Order No.: ME210082 ATTN; RI CHARD DA,HIK E. 12720 NORA = ST$. D cc: =nland Pacific Engineering A,MSNDPD . FIFTH REPORT . P L A T C£ R T I F I C A T E Dated May 26, 1998 at 8:00 a.m. Certificate for filing Plat of: TURTLE CREEK FIRST ADDITION. In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for approval, thia coinpany has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor' s and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United Statea District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for*closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit: That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 East, W.M., described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Southeast quarter; thence south 890461121' East, along the North line of said Southeast quarter a di9tance of 200,00 feet; thence South 0000614111 East, a distance of 25.04 feet to the South right of way line of Eighth Avenue and True Point of Beginning; thence South 89046112" East, along said South right of way line, a distance of 2426.20 feet to the Westerly right of way line of Barker Road; thence South 40004100" West, along said Westerly right of way line, a distance ot 115.00 feet; thence North 89046112" West, a distance o€ 739.67 feet; thence South 000131481' West, a -distance of 4.50 feet; thence North 89046112" West, a distance of 252.00 feet; thence North 00013'46" East, a distance of 4.50 feet; thence North 89046112" West, a distance of 1060.00 feet; thence South 75026128" West, a distance of 129.28 feet; thence South 0001314811 west, a distance of 65:00 feet; thence North 55008145" West, a distance of 151.92 feet; thence North 6105611011 West, a distance of 146.45 feet; thence North 00006'41" West, a distance of 58.28 feet; thence South 89046' 121' East, a distance of 5.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: DAHM DEVELOPMENT, I1VC., a Washington carporation. . ,1 _ • - . .7♦ ' • . CPage 1 of 6 ' 'AN C7 a r er_i r •nn •nn i n ♦ n~i r nr. • n ♦ UlIr1YV n.. . r r . ` . . . , . Order No. ME214082 EXCEPTIONS: 1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to ~Parcel No. 55194.9025. Parcel numbers are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the company. Said parcel numbera are not a matter of the public record therefor, the company makea no aBSUrance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto. 2. Liability to future assessmenta by Consol~dated Irrigation District No. , 19. 3. EASEMENT ANB THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Pacific States Telephone and Telegraph Company PURPOSE: The right to erect, and maintain poZes within the necessary wires and fixtures thereon DATED: April 19, 1906 . RECORDED: May 14, 1906 RECORDING NO.: 142606 4. SEWER AND UTILITY LINE EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: IN FAVOR: Saltese Syndicate LLC, herein referred as to "Saltese" and Millar Morrison, II and Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investment Company, Dahm Development, Inc., a Washington Corporation, Meridian Land, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company and S& B Investments, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company PURPOSE: Installation, repair, maintenance and replacement of various utilities lines, including but not limited to a sewer line A.R.EA AFFEC'TED: 30 feet in width over, aCross and under the First Party's real property RECORDED: March 26, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4087934 5. EASEIK$NT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Wash-ington PURPOSE: Constructing, operating and maintaining a sewer system AREA AFFECTED: 8 inch sewer line will be installed over the subj ect easement . . RECORDED: July 31, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4126696 . D ' . . F ♦ . ' t • Page 2 of 6 . . r ~ 'a ~ •nN ' ~ AC!A1 QLLi'CQ'OLi LTCT 07C CQC 71111 ►If1TINA1CAl$+y/ 1_IA`+IJ ~ ~ C . , • . Order No. ME210082 • 6. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC DIS'I'RXBUTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: - GRANTEE: The washington Water Power Company, a - Washington Corporation PURPOSE: Construct, reconstruct, operate, maintaa.n, repair, and replace an overhead electric . distribution lxne : AREA AFFECTED: North/South line approximately 1,130 feet =East of the West line of said property AND . to place one anchor and downguy approximately 200 feet East of the West lien of said property near the North edge thereof, "facilities" on, over, under, along and across the herein described - property, together with aIl necessary facilities and appurtenances RECORDED: November 6, 1997 RECORDING PTO.: 4158164 7. STRE$T LIGHTING AGREEMENT AND 2HE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: November 24, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4163467 8. DRATNAGE EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF; GRA.NTEE: Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington PURPOSE: Drainage Easemenr - installing operating and maintaining drainage areas and drainage facilities to dispose of runoff AREA AFFECTED: This and other property REC4RDED: November 5, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4158044 7 c ~l . . Page 3 of 6 , • . . - t• • n a ~ . - n n _ . . w w . . • .si . nn •n • uii-au.... ' a r Order No. ME210082 9. OVERHEAD ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTIOI3 LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT AND THE TERMS . r. Ai3D CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTEE: The Washington Water Power Company, a Washington Corporation PURPOSE: Construct, operate and maintain, repair and maintain an overhead electric distribution line to be located on the Idorth/South line approx. 1,130 feet East of the west lien of said property and to place one anchor and down-guy approx. 200 , feet East of the West line of said property near the North ed thereof "facilities", one, over, under along and across the herein described property, together with aZ3 necessary facilities and appurtenances; Grantor shall not construct or maintain any buiYding or structures within the herein described easement area that would interfere with the-mafntenance . or safe operation o£ said facilities or ' that are not in compliance with all safety - and building codes, regul.ati.ons and laws AR.EA AFFECTED:' This and other property RECORDED: November 6, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4158164 10. AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND COAIDTTIONS THEREOF: RECORDED: November 24, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4163467 REGARDING: Street Lighting 11. 'Declaration of Covenant imposed by instrument recorded on February 17, 1998, under Recording No. 4188112. - 12. AGRFEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CQNDITi4NS THEREOF: RECORDED: March 24, 1996 - RECORDING NO,: 4201462 R£GARDING: Natural Outlet Saltese Lake Page 4 of 6 • t • , . „ . . . . . f 1 ♦ ' ^ Order No. ME210082 13. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: GRANTOR: Dahm Development, Inc., a Washington corporation TRUSTEE: Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a Washington corporation BENEFICIARY: Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, . Husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investment : Company, ae to an undivided 55%- interest; ' and s& B Investments, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 45% interest ORIGINAL AMOUNT: $140,040.00 DATED: November 1, 1996 RECORDED: November 6, 1996 RECORDING N0.: 4052458 SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: , BY AGREEMENT DATED: November 1, 1996 • RECORDED: November 6, 1996 ' RECORI?ING NO.: ' 4052459 The above Deed of Trust was made subordinate to the Deed of Trust recorded under Recording No. 4164140, set forth at paragraph 15 herein. 144 NOTICE OF OPTION AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: OPTIONOR: Richard B. Jarvis and Ruth L. Jarvis, husband and wife, d/b/a Jay Investments, as to an undivided 55t interest and S& B InvestmenCs, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 45t interest OPTIONEE: Meridian Land, L.L.C., a Washington Limited Liability Company PROPERTY: Turtle Creek DATED; November 5, 1996 RECORDED: June 4, 1998 RECORDING NO. : 4228286 AFFECTS: This and other property Said Notice of Option is a re-record of instrument recorded under Recording No. 4055408. - Page 5 of 6 - r ''•n~n.n♦ nii • •nn •nn ' i• n♦ n 9/ / A t''1 T 1 I A T 1 N f.t G A1 m 11 1 1.1 A 11 J l 4rder Na. ME210082 - 15. DEED 4F TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: ' GR.ANTOR: Dahm Development Inc., a Waehington Corporation TRUSTEE; Transnation Title Insurance Company BENEFICIARY: Washington Trust Bank, a corporation, ORIGINAL AMOTJNT: $719,500.00 . DATED: o November 21, 1997 RECORDED: November 25, 1997 RECORDING NO.: 4164140 Investigation should be made to determine the present balance owed by contacting the appropriate lender/agency/individual. Ertn oF ExcEpTioNs . TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY , BY For service an this order call: (509) 922--2222 (FAX) 926-1519 Micki Erwin, Title Officer -Enclosure: Paragraphs 3 - 15 Sketch sc . e Page 6 of 6 ~ •'t '~1 7` • A ♦ A I I n I• n A i T l+ 1 A 7 L 11 _ A f1 ' 1 1 T I 1.) A 1 I H A) C A1 H 11 I I.t f1 J / ~ . . ~ ; TRAfVSNATION TiTLE INSURANCE COMPAMY s I This skeich is provided, wfshaut charae, for yocrr ~ ~ intormatian. it is no1 inteiided to shaw a1i matterc ~ 3 retaicd to the property inctudine, but not limite` tn ~ area, dimensiarts, easements, enuuachmert^ oi ~ . - lerat;ort oi apun;fsrics. It is not part nt nnr r'^ ° n mo:tify, the romm+Lment or po!icy tn whirh il ~itache~t. The f:arnrany ass~itrtes NU t!h.".n •vatter re!ated to ths sS:etch. Rr-t4rwcr,e n~~• nar!e to a-i accurate st:rs+ey Srr ;:►rt ; . ~ • ~ ♦ t . ~ ~ ~O' ~r,~,rr_.►r . ~ • . . tir ~ \ - M' ~ ~'j~..~ .1~~.~~~~~ / • ~1 ~ • • ^=°'i•` . • _ ~ + ~ r~' . ?00 ~ . ~pi- ~ ~ : j~ - ~ ~ • ~ r, v~ ~C'~~` ~ Q . f~ ~ ~ ,...,►~3 ~ ~ • c~' J ' ~ S ~ r . ; i 'j . . , . . - - - - • . ~ . - . . ~w s ~ ; . . , I ~ , ' ~ • ; •d i ' i _ • . . 4-5 4-5 - S ~ _ r •t~n • nn S P O K A N E C O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGWEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT December 5, 2001 Contractors Bond & Insurance Co. - PO Box 9271 Seattle WA 98109 RE: Warranty Bond Release for Turtle Creek 1' Addn. P 1753 Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised the Warranty Bond # FA5354 issued by your compariy on September , 14, 1999 to Dahm Development, Inc. for constructed roads and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat in the remaining cwrrent amount of $8,720.00 may now be released in full effective unmediately. The project roads have been established and the warranty period has expired. This final release should close out the above referenced savings certificate. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, a John Hohman, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: Dahm Development, Inc. ~ File . 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 O • ►~.~A'";~ , • - , wARRA.NTY BoNU Bond No. FA5354 KNOW ,A►LL MEN BY 7`UESE PR.ESENTS, that we DAHNI DEVELOPMEN'.C, INC. as Principal, and CON'TR.ACTORS BONDING AND INSUR.ANCE COMPANY COrporation, as Surety, are held firmly bound unto SpokRne Coun as Obligee, in the full andjust sum of ~ ''~~EI GHT THOU SAND SEVEN ~iiJNDRED TW~NTY AND NO / 100 _ ~ ,nn~nDollars v1720.00 fOr thV payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, wc bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, ndministrators, successors and assigns, jointly ancf severally, frmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principal has constructed certaan public road and drZinage improvements for the following developmelit: TURTLE CREEK lst ADDITION - COUN'I'Y PROJECT #P-1753 y ~ . J WSEREA,S, Spokane County regulatioiis require the Principal Co furnish a warranty bond. conditioned to guarantee against all deFects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during a period of one year following the written acceptance of thc roads for maintenance by the Spokane County Board of County Cornmissioners, And NOW, THEREk'ORE, TFLE CONDIT'ION OF TH1S OBLIGATT4N IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of acceptance of thc roads for maintenance by said Board of Counity Commissioners, the road and drainage ivork done under the approved and accepted plans for #his'development shiIl disclose poor workmRnship in the execution of said work, and - the carrying out af the work under the accepted and approved plnus and specifications for this project, or it appears that defective materials wdre furnished thereunder, then this obligation. sball remraixi in full forcc and virtue, otherwise this instrument sha11 be void. . . UPON the failure.of the Principal to correct any disclosed defects in workmxnship and/or materials in accordnnce with the approved and accepted 'plans aud speeifleations for,-.this deveiopment within 45 days of said notjficntion, the Surety shall either perform, or cause to be . performed, any work necessary to properly, correct said defects in accordance wifh the approved and accepted plans aud specification.~ for tbis development or shnll tender to Spnkane County the penal sum of the bond. A,ny funds provided by the Surety in excess of that which is ~ expended to remedy noncompliance will be returned to the Surety upon complction of the : remedinl work. ,iN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the seal and signatvre of said Principal is hereto atrixed aiid the corporate seal and the name of the said Surety is hereto affixed and attested by its duly authorized Attorney-in-Fact this day of~.,r - 11990 . VYitness: . DAf1a-]~EVELOPMENT, NC. ' ~~~xrt - By, • ..a~._,.,,.,Y~,l:~";4'~~ k cipal char . ahm, _ ,r .:Y `~a:r - President CONTRACTORS BONDING AND INSUR.ANCE1. ;.e COMPANY " .:.a , . . :;4. By• ; = Sg . , •r I • +'~•~j A~o~C PCt, JOTJYr 11C1TT01i r..`'•V , . •:,1. ~~;~t`, _ ' . ~~~`ta; _ • 9 i y• ,i ?'L' r F', , , r • ,:I ' . . a . r' , i _ • . . ` . { ' ^ ' • • . 3 , ~ TOTAL P. 0i-; ~ti• r• , . ' • _ , ' f • . , <<-.- ~ ~ • - ~t - . ~ - ~ .i ' : BONDS Aff LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY wsuRaivice Not Valid for Bonds Power of Attorney.~-~~ . Executed On or After: APRIL 3 oTx, 2000 Number: 54923(i \ ! A / • CAREFULLY. I e use I ~ I ~ , e' e / ~~.A valid original of this document must be printed on security paper with black, blue, and red ink, and must bear the raised seal of Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company ( the "Company"). Only an unaltered original of this power of attorney is valid. If a photocopy, the word "VOID" should appear clearly in one or more places. This Power of Attorney is valid solely in connection with the execution and ~-_delivery of the bond bearing the number indicated below, provided the bond is of the type indicated below; and is valid only if the bond is executed on or before the date indicated above. ~p r ' w(T'b~~• . ~ . . , A i ~1! ~NOW~ ALL' MEN B~ THES~ PRE~NT- , t~ 'at- the --ompany dae~s here y ma~ke, ~~onstitute .an~d~,a~point~tVhe fo1=*lowing_: W~W. -L-'LER:, G RGE C. 5C-HROEDER♦ i~ LO~~S~~ TEW~'ARTh ~ ~ I fl7i h~i,k'Nti+R1ry,4ti~1 1(~l c~►f•llip ~JOANNETONANI,;~ C~I R~I~S ' RSON 13d: JODY ~TT '~=s_ t- e and wf.u~l A~to~~'r-ney(:s.j~"~ii~- ~ ~ 4F ot%t2i ~ ~ul~~'a~ ower-. and a thor- ~t he; eb _ ~ tx~,~tku;» p, y r y- o~f~e~r• ed _..in i- s~'ame, plac.e,rl,a~nd "edge~-and de_l'--iver~• SSA- ar n•.-aed pe~rfor~man,~~,,ra ~ ~ ayzne exceeding ;hs pena~ ~s.um =of $1, 2=50.,:0-0:0; bid~ ~ds ~fo,rt ~~ob 'si' r ~ ~~lV~l~ ,~r'• 1w - ~ahere_, a.Yf- 'tihe .contract ~ s awas - ed tshe BA _ w , gua,rante, - ~ _e-r--formance aad~/~or~ ~r~ ~ ayment `bond'(.s- w'~ ~1 not exc ed $1, 2F5~0 , O~fl 0~; (~3~) al l o~~h r bonds code~dµ or . ~ fied~b the Suz ~t~~y s•so-Y~ation ~f~ Ame~r'ca Manua ' of Ru~les, ~ ~.,~,~,r, Y P~ •ocedures nd ~ ~Cl~i1fiaatiori fo ~Fi~dl~ity /q ogery, and Su~r ty ~ori 's inc~1-~in f)uture ;~.~utrr~K~it~-~~, r~, • ; : ,amendmens~~~ th,e'r•eto) ~as .Tudi~ci~a=., -ontract. r-exc~ ~"'d~_ng =b~:~~ bonds j Mi.scel°l~' neoup N<<~ icfL+~~(1r9~rmr',,~';~,~~~~~~r,•~'t.~~ ~L.wcen~s~e d~~rtand. erml't?, arid~ Federal no, exc.eedi~.~ ~~he- ~ez 0 0~)0~~ 4 J na um-• of~ $ 6 0 0I0 rR'~n~~l ~~i~'~'~'~l'i~~t~R,•~'t'~'~;'~In~{I~,~- ~ ~ ,i Jt~tT~~~1 ;~bid~bo dsf,o [obs wr~:~tten pu~ u~nt :o&t e ut~l~or•i~t,`y~-' i3~c1~a•u~se ~3~) a• - ove. wh`ere„ sf h*~ , - - ~ the, ,contractis awar e _ , he~rrf.to.-rmance a ~d/~or pa.y~nent- ~ 41,5 a~~~,~~ ~ e cee 4'0 0 , ~ _ (~5",) al~l ot~er:~ boz~ds°- o~• exceeding> t'~ _ ~~Qna sum of ~ ~ ~ • ~.Ir t=0;0~0-;,, ~ ~ - ~ancl, (•6) co'nsents~,~ rel~eases and" ot~her• sim• l~a- doeument~s -ec,~u red by an o}~lilc~ee eund'er a' con '~rac~t b~on`d~ed~ tjhe Company. Th~' s a p,~' n~t en•t i~s made under the uthor.ri~ty of~ the $oa~rd• of Di.~r. et r<s of t~he Company. - - - - - r ~~'l _•4~~v~?n- ~ - T . - . . CERTIFICATE the undersigned secretary of Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company, a.:..- y Washington corporation, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this Power of Attorney remains in full : force and effect and has not been revoked, and, furthermore, that the resolutions of the ~ Board of Directors set forth on the reverse are now in full force and effect. f~.~ Bond Number FA5354 Signed and sealed this 14th ~a of SEPTIIKBER 1999 , 7 ` , • M~ - NS • f ~~'F~=~ .s ~:t;~~'-.~ ~ Kevin L. Lybeck, Secretary : ~ . ' r • . ~ : ~ ~ .Y ,v• ~r CBIC • 1213 Valley Street • P. ox 9271 • Seattle, WA 98109-0271 p (206) 622-7053 • (800) 765-CBIC (National) • (206) 382-9623 FAX ~ X-a r PoaLPOA.02-US031296 ' / , • , / ` . • ~ . . ~ ~ . . ~ . , _ ~ ` ' ` ' . , . , : ~ ~ d ` ' , .n ~ ~....f. Certi f'icate o f Appa "ment and Resodutions o f t1 ;oard o fDirectors The undersigned President and Secretary of Contractors Bonding and Insurance Compariy hereby certify that the ~ President has appointed the Attorney(s)-in-Fact identificd on the front side of this powcr of attorney, under and, by the authority of the following resolutions adopted by the Board oi Directors of Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company at a meeting duly held on December 15, 1993: - ;RESOLVED, that the CEO, President, CFO, any Vice President, Secretarv or any ~ssistant Secretary, and any other employee as may be specifically atithorized by a partirulai- board resolution ' (hereafter "Authorized Officer or Employee") may appoint attorneys-in-fact or agenrs ~vith authority . e, , as defined or limited in the instrument evidencing the appointment in each case, far and on behalf of M • the Company, to execute and deliver and affix the seal of the Company to bonds, undertakings, ~ - recognizances, and suretyship obligations of a11 l:inds; and any Authorized Officer or En-iployee may ~ remove any such attorney-in-fact or agent and revoke any power of attorney previously granted to . such person. RESOLVED FURTHER, that any bond, underfial:ing, recognizance, or suretyship obligation shall be valid and binding upon the Company: ' f- - (i) when signed by the Aufihorized Officer or Employee ancl attested and sealed (if a seal be required); or - • (ii) when signed by the Authorized Officer or Einployee, and cotintersigned and sealed ~(if a seal,.be zequired) by a duly authorized attarney-in-fact or agent; or (iii) when duly executed and sealed (if a seal be required) by one or more attorneys-in- ' fact or agents pursuant to and within the limits of the authority evidenced by the t- power of afitorney issued by the Company to such person or persons. ~RESOLUED FURTHER, tlzat the signariire of any Aut]ZOrized Officer or Employee and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or certification t1lereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or other suretyship obligations of the Company (unless otherwise specified in the power of attorney itself); and such signature and seal . when so used shall have' fihe same fo1•ce and effect as though manually affixed. ~ RESOLNIED FURTHER, that all previous resolutions of the Board of Directors concerning powers of attorney and attorneys-in-fact remain in full fUrce and effect; that all forms of pUwers of attorney previously or in the (uture approved by the Board of Dirertors, including, but not limited to, so called "fax or facsimile powers of attorney", where the entire power of attorney is a facsimile, remain in full force and effect; and that one form of a power of attorney may be attached to one bond (for exainple, the form for which this resolution is a part may be attached to a bid bond), and another form of power of attorney may be attached to another bond (for example, a fax power of attorney may Ue attached to the final bond for a project for which the different form ot power was attached to the bid bond) without affecting the validity of either power of attorney or bond. IN WITNESS 1NHEREOF, Contractors t3onding and Insurance C:ompaI1)1 has caused thesc presents to be signed by its president and secretary, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixcd this lst day of January, 1994. - ~ ~r ~ Ti- State of Washington Steve,t A. Gain~s, Attest! ~ Kevin L. Lybeck, Secretary . County of I<ing • OriJanuary 1st, 1994 before me, Molly A. Hudspeth Notary Public, personally anpeared Steven A. Gaines and Kevin L. Lybeck, personally known to me to be the persons wliose names are subscribed to the within instzument, and acknowl- edged to me all that they executed the same in th@ir authorized capacities and that by their signahires-t)e entity upon behalf of which theSJ acted eaectrted the instrument. - : WITNESS i7iy hand and official seaL 0FFtCLA- SM MOL1,Y A. HUDSPETH . Sianature • (seal) Ftotary Puwic - stace of wasnington a . ~ . ~ Molly A. Hudspeth, Notary I'ublic MyCommissron ExRires 1-9-01 S P O K A, N E O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGINEERING AND ROABS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT December 5, 2001 Wahington Trust Bank . . PO Box 2127 Spokane, WA 99210 Attn: International Banking , RE: Bearing A.ccount Number 433214 for Residential Construction of Turtle Creek lSt Addn P 1753 Dear Sir or Madam: Please be advised that the bearing account number 433214 dated December 26, 1997 . i1 issued by your company for Dahm Development, Inc. as surety for installations of roads ; and associated drainage facilities for the above mentioned plat in the remaining current amount of $56,600.00 may now be released in full effective unmediately. Tlus final release should close out the above referenced savings certificate. If you have any questions, please call me at (509) 477-3600. Sincerely, John Hohman, PE Development Services Engi.neer/Manager , cc: Dahim Development Znc. File ~ 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 ~(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD: (509) 477-7133 111/ - . WashingtonTrust Bank . . . ; May 15, 1998 . - . Bill Johns, P . E . . . ' Spokane County Engineer ' 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0170 - . , S u b j °ct : Dev2loper/Borrower : DAHM DKIELGPMEIVT, IrdC . .Mortgage Loan No.: 433214 Spokane Engineers Project File . Funds in the amount of $56,600.00 are being held in a special non- _interest bearing account in the name of DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC. (Developer/Borrower) et ux, for the purpose of assuring completion of installation of roadway surfacing,, including grading and gravel, storm drainage and monuments in Ti7RTLE CREEK PHASE I(Name of ~ Development) , in accordance with the drawjings and specifi_cations as submitted to and.approved by the County of Spokane Engineer's . Office on the 26th day of December, 1997. No funds will be disbursedfrom this account without written ~ authorization of the Spokane County Engineer. This set aside of funds will not be revoked without the consent of the County . Engineer. . In the event that the completion and accept.ance of the above-na.med improvements for maintenance by the ~o~jnty of Spokane are not accomplished within a period of one year from the date of this ' agreement, all funds remaining in the account wi-11 be forfeited to 'Cr.e C."ounty of Spokane upon wr--.--L-ter: re-quest ;y che I."pokane C-oun".y . Engineer' s Of f ice to Washington Trust Bank (Mortgage Company). , ly It is understood and agreed that upon the forfeiture of the funds r~ to the County of Spokane, that the County of Spokane will t hen undertake completion of the subdivision to be accon:plished within . twelve (12) months f rom the date of fcl-iEiture of funds. It is , further understood and agreed that in the event of any sliortage of : funds to complete improvements, the Ccuntv of Spokane may have -recourse against DAFIIM DEVELOPMENT, INC.• (Developer/Bo.rrower) named above. . . . . p, . P.O. Box 2127, Spokane, Washington 99210-2127 (509) 353-3979 °•~Builder Services 717 W. Sprague Ave., Spokane, Washington 99204 FAX (509) 358-8280 . Page 2 . It is specifically understood and agreed by the parties, that in holding funds for this development, Waahington Trust Bank (Mortgage company) is not serving as guarantor for any additional costs incurred by the County of Spokane in the completion and acceptance ' of the above-named improvements. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED THIS day of MAY, 1998. MORTGAGE COMPANY: WASHINGTON TRUST BANK _ Builder Services Address: P. O. Box 2127 . City State Zip: Spokane, WA 99210-2127 Phone: 353-4850 . BY : _.LqnOlvnC, ~ . &Vice President DEVELOPER/BORROWER: DAHM DEVELOPMENT, INC. Address: 12720 E. Nora Avenue, " Suite D City State Zip: Spo , WA 99216 •A Phone: 9 -5 7 ~ By : Pr sident OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER: By: ~ . J • S P O K A N E a. C O U N T Y DMSION OF ENGIlVEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer June 2, 1999 - Mr. Richard T. Dahm Dahm Development, Inc. 12720 E. Nora, Suite E . Spokane, WA 99216-1197 RE: Turtle Creek Bond Reduction Request Dear Rich: We are ready to release your bond upon receipt of a warranty bond in the amount of $ 8,720.00 that will run for a one year period starting June 1, 1999. The warranty bond is to be 5% of the original amount or $ 174,400 x.OS 8,720.00. I have enclosed a copy of a warranty bond form we have been using. If you choose a savings assignment you can use the same language contained in this form. When we get the warranty bond, I will immediately release the existing savings assignment. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Bill Hemmings, PE . Development Services Engineer/Manager , cc: File 1026 W. Broadway Ave. 9 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 C 601 West Main, Suite 140('' - ' P.O. Box 2151 ' - Spokane, WA 99210-215 i -509-358-3900 Fax 509-358-3937 - SEABURY & SMITH Insurance Program Management September 16, 1999 ' A~'C F~VF Spokane County Development and Engineering Services ~ . . , , 1999 Attn: Bill Hemmings 1026 W. Broadway Ave. Public Works Building Spokane, WA 99260 RE: DAHIVi DEVELOPMENT, INC. WARRANTY BONDS TURTLE CREEK PROJECT rTLTMl3ERS: P-1753 and P-1753A Dear Mr. Hemmings: Enclosed are the two new Warranty Bonds as requesfied for Dahm Development, Inc. for the Turtle Creek Development and the two projects as captioned above. Please file these bonds with your office. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, Mr. Hemmings. Please give me a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, 4 LA~ Jody Hatton Bond Department Enclosures k Cc: Dahm Development, Inc. >a An MMC Company , . ~ ~ S P O K A N E O U N T Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer June 7, 1999 Mr. Richard T. Dahm Dahm Development, Inc. 12720 E. Nora, Suite E Spokane, WA 99216-1197 RE: Turtle Creek Bond Reduction Request - P-1753 Dear Rich: ` We would be more than happy to do as you asked but unfortunately the ~ original bond language is structured for performance of the construction only and does not include any language at this time for a warranty period. We need to revise the language in the future to allow for a vvarranty periad aad this problem will be avoided. In the mean time, please provide the warranty bond or revise the language in the bond that was provided and have the bank reissue it so that it clearly includes the warranty language that I provided in my last transmittal. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, c ~ Bill Hemmings, PE Development Services Engineer/Manager cc: File . 1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166 • CS, DAHM DEVELOPIVYENT, MC. 509/928..5777 - Fax 509)9264690 12720 E. Nora, Suite E . Spokane, WA 99216-1197 . . , ~s- . VIA FAX 509/324-7655 June 42 1999 Spokane County W. 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 - Attention: Bill Hemnzings ' Re: Turtle Creek 1"` Addition Dear Bi11: I beheve a11 we need from you is a letter similar to the one attached from County utilities stating that you authorize the existing letter of credit to be xeduced effective 6/01/99 for the 1 year vvarxanty period. If there is any problem with doing it this way please call me to discuss. Very truly yours, . Richard T. Dahm., ~ President RTD: sjb Encl. . . . '~y{r'.'r ~v ^ % • ~ww IZ •....A.w~w~i.......~....~ w..wlw~w~iw- ~ri~~ww•wV - fA~l ilrR..°~ati• . i. ' MAINTENANCE BOND Bond No, - . ~ , KNOW ALi.. MEN SY THESE PRESENTS, that we as Principal, and corporation, as Surety, are ~ held firmly bvund unto _ as Obiigee, in ihe full and just sum of Oollars (S fo7r the payment of which sum, wel) and truly to be rnade, we bind oursefves, our heirs, executors, administra- tors, successors and assigns, jointly and severai(Y, firm1Y by these presents. WHEREAS, the said Principaj entered into a contract wrth ~ dated for ; . . ~ - ; WHEREAS, s2id contract provides that th2 Principa) will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of year(s) after approval of the final esfimate on said job, by the owner, against al1 defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period, 2nd WHEREAS, the said contract has been completed, and was approved on NOW, TNEREFORE, THE COND(TiON OF THIS OBL3GATiON 1S SUCH, that if within year(s) firom the date of apprava) of ihe said contract the work done under the terms of said contract shaZ1 disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said contract or it shall appear that deiective materials were furnished thereunder, then thfs obligation shall remain in ful( force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shatl be void. • Signed and sealed this day of ,.19 . Witness: - - ~ ~ ~ ~ Princlp3i ; ~ , ( Q. . , . - / : • 1 ''r . . Attomey-in -Fact I ♦~~~.cr-t#~¢ . DA~ ~~VELOPMEN~, INC. 509/928•5777 . Fax 509/926-4690 12720 E. Nora, Suite E Spokane, QVA 9921 b-1 I97 . , . o . VIA FAX 509/324-7655 Spokane County Division of Engineering W. 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, OVA 99260 ~ Attezttion: )Bill Hemmings Re: Turtle Creek Phase Dear Bill: Randy Stronks iuformed me earlier today that the Punch List is 100% complete. ]Piease seaad out your standard letter to reduce tbe bond amounts. V'ery tnWy youxs, . ` -T • - Richard T. Dahnn, ~ President RTD:sjb . cc: Bill Johns - Spokane County cc: Randy Stxonks - Spokaue Counfiy cc: Connie Biscboff - Washingtan Trust Bank r n n . ~ a ~ . . , ..Y`qJ ~K j., - , ~ w -Af. --A-AA ftt • /A • if AA IAA ]~I~ . ~ , 1 st Road and DrainagE Bonding Reduction PROJECT P1753 TURTLE CREEK 1 ST ADD NAME D.BERTO DATE 14-May-98 DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1350.00 ~ 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B@ 10% EA 0.4 1700.00 680.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 320.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4@ 10% EA 0.2 300.00 60.00 6) Backfiil For DW @ 10% CY 16 17.25 276.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 800.00 0.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. - LF 24.00 0.00 ~ 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. @ 100% LF 22.5 27.00 607.50 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 29.00 0.00 ~ 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 30.00 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid @ 10% EA 0.2 325.00 65.00 14) Ditch /208 Excavation @ 100% CY 250 10.00 2500.00 15) Sod @ 100% SF 5400 0.70 3780.00 ' NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) 4' Wide Type 1 Curb Inlet @ 100°io EA 6 550.00 3300.00 ~ 2) 5' Wide Type 1 Curb Inlet @ 100% EA 2 650.00 1300.00 3) Type 2 Curb Inlet Spo. Co. Std B-9 @ 100% EA 6 750.00 4500.00 4) Pheasant Park Drainage Ditch & 208 Restoration @ 10 LS 750.00 5) Seeding Of Pheasant Park Ditch & 208 Swales @ 100 LS 250.00 ~ DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 18068.50 16) Monuments @ 100% EA 4 185.00 740.00 17) Barricade LF 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs @ 100% EA 2 90.00 180.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 920.00 GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade @ 10% CY 290.9 10.00 2909.00 20) Top Course @ 10% CY 143.39 15.50 2222.55 21) Base Course CY 15.50 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete @ 10% Tons 97.99 46.00 4507.54 23) Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R@ 10% LF 279.72 8.50 2377.62 26) Sidewalk @ 100% SQ YD 1455.2 17.50 25466.00 ~ . NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 37482.71 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 56,471.21 USE $56, 500.00 .•r I~EER : . ~ . ~TY C4U oN ~,(;e ASNINGT ' pFF Col)N~cY, ~ SpO~`NE Dote : unicotio ater-of4ite C0 To Fro"'~`',-Y- . ~ ~ . Subtect . ~ ~ . ~ / C ~ . . . . . 327 -C.R. Form ~ . R..~d~ and Drainage Bonaing Estimate PROJECT P1753 TURTLE CREEK 1 ST ADD NAME D.BERTO DATE 31-Dec-97 DRAINAGE ITEMS - UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Dryweli - Type A EA 1350.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B j~% EA 4 1700.00 6800.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 320.00 0.00 4) Grate Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 5) Grate - Type 4 [Q EA 2 300.00 ' 600.00 6) Backfill For DW 10 7a CY 160 17.25 2760.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 800.00 0.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. ' LF 24.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. f (YYlo LF 22.5 27.00 607.50 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 29.00 0.00 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 30.00 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid 10/ EA 2 325.00 ~ 650.00 14) Ditch /208 Excavation l DO ~ CY 250 10.00 2500.00 15) Sod I D 0~/o SF 5400 0.70 3780.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 1) 4' Wide Type 1 Curb Inlet l C:+O/0 EA 6 550.00 3300.00 2) 5' Wide Type 1 Curb Inlet ~ pp 0/ . EA 2 650.00 1300.00 3) Type 2 Curb Inlet Spo. Co. Std B-9 EA ~ 6 750.00 4500.00 4) Pheasant Park Drainage Ditch & 208 Restoration ~ bb ~ LS 750.00 5) Seeding Of Pheasant Park Ditch & 208 Swales /do ~lo LS 250.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 27797.50 16) Monuments /OD ~X; EA 4 185.00 740.00 17) Barricade LF 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs ( DO /u EA 2 90.00 180.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 920.00 , GRADfNG, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK 19) Rough Grade 1o o CY 2909 10.00 29090.00 20) Top Course ( o o/v CY 1433.9 15.50 22225.45 21) Base Course CY 15.50 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete I C> ~/'q Tons 979.9 46.00 45075.40 • 23? Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 ~ 24) Curb Type 6 LF 8.50 0.00 25) Curb Type R ~ Q°~ ~ LF 2797.2 8.50 23776.20 26) Sidewalk 1 00.o/p SQ YD 1455.2 17.50 25466.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS . , 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 GRADING AND SURFACING 145633.05 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 174,350.55 USE $174,400.00 ♦ 0 OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON TO: CHAD COLES FROM: DAVE BERTO DATE: May 13, 1998 SUBJECT: BOND ITEMS P1753 TURTLE CREEK 1ST ADD The bond for the above mentioned project is for the following items: 1) All the items on the approved road and drainage plans. 2) Plat has not finalized. ~ A, b A:,i Road and Drainage B'onding Estimate =-s J PROJECT P1753 TURTLE CREEK 1 ST ADD NAME D.BERTO DATE 31-Dec-97 . ~ DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANTITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 1350.00 0.00 . 2} Drywell - Type B EA 4 1700.00 6800.00 3} Grate - Type 1 EA 320.00 0.00 - 4) Grate Type 2 EA 345.00 0.00 ' 5) Grate - Type 4 EA 2 300.00 600.00 ~ 6? Backfill For DW CY 160 17.25 2760.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 800.00 0.00 8? C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 24.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 22.5 27.00 607.50 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 29.00 0.00 ~ 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 30.00 0.00 ' 12) Precast Manhole EA 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 2 325.00 650.00 P, 14) Ditch /208 Excavation CY 250 10.00 2500.00 15) Sod SF 5400 0.70 3780.00 .pi NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS t 1) 4' Wide Type 1 Curb Inlet EA 6 550.00 3300.00 , 2) 5` Wide Type 1 Curb Inlet EA 2 650.00 1300.00 3) Type 2 Curb Inlet Spo. Co. Std B-9 EA 6 750.00 4500.00 ~ 4) Pheasant Park Drainage Ditch & 208 Restoration LS • 750.00 , 5) Seeding Of Pheasant Park Ditch & 208 Swales LS 250.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 27797.50 . 16) P1lonuments EA 4 185.00 740.00 17) Barricade LF 35.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 2 90.00 180.00 ' OTHER SUBTOTAL 920.00 ' GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK fl 19) Rough Grade CY 2909 10.00 29090.00 20) Top Course CY 1433.9 15.50 22225.45 21) Base Course CY 15.50 0.00 , 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 979.9 46.00 45075.40 ° 231 Curb Type A LF 7.50 0.00 24} Curb Type B LF 8.50 0.00 ~ 25} Curb Type R LF 2797.2 8.50 23776.20 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 1455.2 17.50 25466.00 NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1 ) . 0.00 2) 0.00 31 0.00 - GRADING AND SURFACING 145633.05 CONSTRUCTION TOTAL 174,350.55 • USE $174,400.00 ~ ~ ~ , STRLET G!UAfVT I T T ES PROJECT NOo - P1753 DESIGIVER-- D. BERTO DATE-- 12/ ;1/97 PROJECT DESCRI F'T I C7iJ-- 1"URTLE CRCEK 1 ST ;i ST REET # 1 . iVAME- aTH AVEhlUE LENGTM- 2398.11 FT. WIDTH- 29.00 FT. aEG I iVN I NG STAT I OtV = 1000.00 END ING STAT I OiV = 339 8. 1 1 ONE S I vE QNLY PW I llTH= 16.00 EW I DTH= 0.00 GtW I DTH- 13.00 T iVl'ER # 1 T TlVCLUDED T SW T DTH = 32.00 SK 0.00 RAD =20. 00 T NTER # T I NCLUDED I SW I DTH = 32.00 SN. =0. 00 RAD =`0. 00 TEftM # 1 : CH0P1'CD TERhi #2 a CRQSS STREET I NCLUDED EW 8.00 F'W 10.00 S!', 0.00 RAD 20.00 r TEM MEASUREMEiVT G?UAIVT I l"Y , SURFACE AREA-- 70776.39 S. F. : ROADWAY EXCAVAT I0N 1.00 FT. 2621.3 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACIIVG TOP COURSE 0.50 FT. 1310.7 C. Y. - CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE 0.00 F7o 0.0 C. Y. ASPHALT CONCHLTE 0.17 FT. 895.6 TOIVS CURP TYPE R EX I ST I NG 0.00 FT. F'ROPOSED 2381.2 FT. S I DEWALK EX T ST I NG 0.00 S. Y. F'ROPOSED 1455.2 S. Ya S1"REET # 2 IVAME- GREENACRES ROAD LENGTH- 140.00 FT. WIDTH-- 32.00 F 1" . gEG I NNX NG STAT I ON = 1160.27 END I NG STAT I ON = 1300. 27 1'EftM # 1 : Ci-iOPF'ED TERM # CROSS STREET EXCLUDEll EW 0.00 F'W 16.00 SK 0.00 RAD 20.00 I TE1y1 MEASUREMENT QUAiVI" I TY 5URF=faCE AREA- 3328.00 a. F. ROADWAY EXCAVAT Z QN 1.00 FT. 123.3 C. Y. CRUSHED SURFACThlG TOP COURSE 0.50 FT. 61.6 C. Yo CRUSHED SURFACING PASE GOURSE 0.00 FT. 0.0 C. Y. ASF'HALT CONCRETC 0.17 FT. 42.1 TOhIS CURP TYPIE R EXI5TING iZ►. 00 FT. F'ROPOSED ►'0g. 0 F'T. S7 REET # 3 NAME- BE r GE ROAD LENG7H- 140.00 FT. W T DTH- 32.00 FT. BEG I Nh! T NG STAT I ON = 1465.01 END I NV STAT I ON = 1605.01 T E RM # 1: CHC1PPE.ll TERM # CROSS STREET EXCLUDED EW 0.00 F'W 16. 00 SF: 0.00 RAD 20.00 I TEM mEASU REMEiVT QUAhIT I TY _____------____-___________r__---__________________-__________________________ V10 S. F. SUR1=ACE AREA-- 3328. ROADWAY EXCAVR"f IOhI 1.33 FT. 164.3 C. Y. CRUS1-iED SURFfaC T NG TOF' COURSE 0.50 r"T. 61.6 C. Y. CRUSHEll SURFACING RASE CDURSE 0.00 FT. 0.0 C. Y. ASPHALT CONCRETE 0.17 FT. 42.1 TOIVS CURR TYF'E R EX I ST I NG 0.00 FT. F'ROF'OSED 208.0 FT. - . - - - - • -.r'~rs;~i . . .i' 8 ~ p l"Ol"ALS . . ROADWAY EXCAVA7 T ON 2909.0 C' Y'. CRUSHED SURFACIIVG T0P CCIURSE 1433.9 C. Y-. _o CRUSHEll SURFACINC PASE COURSE 0.0 C. Y. AaPHALT CQIVCRETE 979.9 TONS ~ CURR "fYF'E R 2797. FT. S I DEWALK 1455.2 S. Y. : r.-r nrr-r r+II1Al"'Y T T Y f"f'' - BOND ESTI~MATE ~ Job Name~k1' ~~y ISTADP, Job. No. P /765 DATE 30-Dec-97 t.~`' - DRAINAGE ITEMS UNITS QUANITY PRICE COST 1) Drywell - Type A EA 0.00 1250.00 0.00 2) Drywell - Type B EA 4.00 1650.00 6600.00 3) Grate - Type 1 EA 0.00 315.00 0.00 4) Grate - Type 4 EA 2.00 340.00 680.00 ~ 5) Grate - Type 3 EA 0.00 300.00 0.00 6) Backfill For DW CY 160.00 16.00 2560.00 7) Concrete Inlet EA 0.00 750.00 0.00 8) C.M. Pipe 10" Dia. LF 0.00 23.00 0.00 9) C.M. Pipe 12" Dia. LF 22.50 27.00 607.50 ~ 10) C.M. Pipe 15" Dia. LF 0.00 27.80 0.00 . 11) C.M. Pipe 18" Dia. LF 0.00 31.50 0.00 12) Precast Manhole EA 0.00 1500.00 0.00 13) Solid lid EA 2.00 310.00 620.00 14) Ditch/208 Excavation CY 250.00 10.00 2500.00 15) Sod SF 5400.00 0.70 3780.00 NON STANDARD DRAINAGE ITEMS 4' WIDE TYPE 1 CURB INLET EA 6.00 0.00 5' WIDE TYPE 1 CURB INLET EA 2.00 0.00 TYPE 2 CURB INLET - SPO. CO. STD. B-9 EA 6.00 0.00 Pheasant Park Drainage Ditch & 208 Restoration LS 750.00 0.00 Seeding of Pheasant Park ditch & 208 Swales LS 250.00 0.00 g) 0.00 DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL 17347.50 16) Monuments EA 185.00 0.00 17) Barricade LF 33.00 0.00 18) Street Signs EA 85.00 0.00 OTHER SUBTOTAL 0.00 - GRADING, SURFACING, CURB, AND SIDEWALK ~ 19) Rough Grade CY 10.00 0.00 20) Top Course CY 16.00 0.00 21) Base Course CY 16.00 0.00 22) Asphalt Concrete Tons 44.40 0.00 23) Curb Type A LF 7.00 0.00 24) Curb Type B LF 8.00 0.00 25) Curb Type R LF 8.00 0.00 26) Sidewalk SQ YD 16.70 0.00 , NON-STANDARD ROAD ITEMS 1) 0.00 2) 0.00 3) 0.00 4) 0.00 _ " ~ • ~ ~ I GRADING AND SURFACING 0.00 GRAND TOTAL 17,347.50 g .i' . - RT DEVELOPMENT, L. L. C. ~ 12720 E. NORA, SLJITE E SPOKANE, WA 99216-1197 RECE . ~ . - . . : . . . IVED 509/928-5777 SFp ► . . ~ . ~ 3 ~ 1999 ~ . . . . , SPOKa ~ . , ► ~ . NE COUNT1' Er1G1NEER !pA ~ 5t•• {^.p 2 •.~l~l•~ ' ' September 29, 1999 Spokane County Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 . ~•~:K Attention: Pat Harper ' Re: Offiite Pedestrian Pathway for Turtle Creek and Turtle Creek South a ~ Dear Pat: I have enclosed a copy of the fully executed memo of September 28, 1999, regarding the Barker pathway. I will have Tim Schwab of CLC Associates, Inc. make a notation on the path plans in accordance . with this agreement. Very truly yours, ~ Richard T. Dahm, • ~ Manager . Encl. ~ cc: Bill Hemmings - Spokane County Engineers cc: Tim Schwab - CLC Associates, Inc. . p ~ . i ' ~ J : 5tr eb. 1 yyy 8: 01 AM SPK ~HLDG&PLANN I NG NO. 781 P. 212 ; 1 ' - - , • • r ' County . ' • Public Work% ' - • • a ' County • ' g ' • • Memo To: PE 1615, Turtle Creek South and PE 1753 TurtJe Creek Files Fram: Pafi Harper, Transportation Englneering Supervisorq.AA Cc: Bill Hemmings, P.E., Development Services Dafe: Sepfember 28, 1999 Rw Off-site pedestrian pathway for requirements for TurUe Creek South and Turde Creek The two preliminary plats of PE 1815, Turt1e Creek South, owned by R.T. Development LLC and F'E 1753 TurUo Creek, whfch is owned by Dahm Development (nc. are the subject of this agreement. These plats are located in the southwest quadrant of 8th Avenue and Barker Road intersecflon and have identicaf condifions of approval regarding an ofr-site pathway to be canstructed along Barker Road to provide for non-motorTZed safety concems raised in the public hearmgs and environmental documents fior the respective plats. Based upon the recent subrnitta( af TurUe Creek South phase ( the following requirement shall be imposed. 1he applicant agrees to construct the pathway per fthe conditions of approval of TurtJe Creek South extending along the frontage of Barker Road and terminating at 8h Avenue. This (mprovement requlres the submittal of plans and erther construcbon of /or appropriate surety provided for this pathway prior to final plat approval. The applicant further agrees that prior to finalization of any additional plats within PE 1815, Turtle Creek South or PE 1753 1"urUe Creek the applicant shall construct the off-site pathway as dascribed in their respectlve conditions of approval alon r Road fr4m e'" venue north to Appleway. Revieweti and Ac}nowledged by ~~~~Date Dahm Development, Inc. R' rd T ahm, Presldent, G~/l Date . . BY• RT Development LLC Ri ard T. Dahm, Manager . • Page 1 - 1 1 C ~ , • ; ~ RT DEVELOPMENT, L. L. C. 12720 E. NOR.A, SLJITE E . SPOKANE, WA 99216-1197 RFCEIV28-5777 ~D , 509/9 SFp 3 . n 19,99 . , . SPpk AN , _ . F COUNTr Er:GINEER September 29, 1999 , Spokane County V Public Works W. 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260 Attention: Pat Harper Re: Offsite Pedestrian Pathway for Turtle Creek and Turtle Creek South Dear Pat: I have enclosed a copy of the fully executed memo of September 28, 1999, regardinQ the Barker pathway. I tivill have Tim Schwab of CLC Associates, Inc. make a notation on the path plans in accordance with this agreement. ~ Very truly yours, . < < Richard T. Da ~ hn-~ Manager Encl. cc: Bill Hemmin~s - Spokane County Engineers cc: Tim Schwab - CLC Associates, Inc. . . . , . - .s • ,•r iv. vt r. C/G t o ~ L p• . ' County • blic Wd . y . • , ane County g ' • . • , . . , . Memo t:- - • . - . ' . , To: PE 1E15, Turtle Creek South and PE 1753 TurVe Greek Files .'r.~From: Pat Harper, Transportation Engineering Supervisor;~OA Cc: Bill Hemmings, P.E., Development Services , Dafe: September 28, 1999 . R~ Ofr-si te pedestrian pathway for requiremen'ts for Turte Creek Sauth end Turtle Creek Yhe two preliminary plats of PE 1815, Turtle Creek South, owned by R.T. Deve!opment LLC 2nd pE 1753 Turuo Crzek, whlch is owned by Dahm Deve!opment (nc. are the subject of tfiis agreement. These plats are located in the southwest quzdrant of 80' Avenue and 8aeKer Road intersection and have identir f conditFOns of approval regarding an off-site paifiway to be canstructed along Barker Raad to : provlde for non-motorized safely concems raised in the public he2rings and envROnmenfial documents . for the respective plats. Based upon the recent submitta( of Turf]e Creek South phase I the followina requirement shzll be imposed. - The applicant 2grees to construct the pathway per the condi6ons of approvd of Turde Creek Soutf-i extending alona the frontage of Bark2r Road and terminattng at 8~' Avenue, This Improvement requires the submiftal ofi plans and either construction of /or appropriate surety provided for this patfiway prior to fina) plat approval. The P-pplican► further agrees that prior to fin2lization oT any additional plats within PE 1815, Turtle Crzek South or PE 1753 7'urte Creek the applicant shall construct tt1e off-sit2 pathvrray as described in their respective conditions of approval alon r Road from 8" tenus north to Appleway, Reviewed and Ac!mowledged by Date / ~ . Dahrn Development, Inc. R~ rd T ahm, PresldEnt, , gy: .i , l•~/l r Da te . RT Deve!opmert LLC Ri ' ard T. Dahm, Man2ger .i .5 •Page1 . . . l~. . . . ; . _ , • . . . _ . . . . . MAR-16-1995 09:05 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.01 . ~ ~ . DaTE; 0A. . •J~ TO; . ~ ANY: U INLAND P.ACIFIC ENGiNEERING CO. COMP ~ 707 West 7th Ave,, Suite 200 er....;., r.~: Spokane, -WA 99204 ~ FAX NUMBER: ~ • ~ ' ~ , N~ ~~•~C 1►~/ . ~ Telephone - (509) 458-6840 F,AX - (509) 458-6844 i FROM: _ y ~EZL i 4 . . ~ i NUMBER OF PAGES: JOB NUMBER ~ . INCL COVER PAGE ~ NOTES: , ~ . . ~ U • n ~ ~ . ~ y.. t • . FAX TRANSMISSIOiV ~ v,~ ' S •J .~'~~'t'J1~~.•` z~ - . ; . ~ MAR-16-1995 09:05 INLAND PACIFIC ENG P.02 sv . ~":f. INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. . .y . . Y<r,.: r March * 15 ~ - ~ ' w.o. 9a221 Spokane County Planning Department . 1026 ;wesc sroadway ~ -s~~•: . Spokane, WA 99260 . RE: Agpendix to threshold. study for Tustle Creek Dear Pat: ' . I understand that, as the appmval process for this project has drawn to a close, issues r+elati.ng to the intersection of Appleway & Spra~gue, have continued to arise. This intersection was only studied after the initial distribution of tcaffic was brought into question. I do not believe that the tcaffic -froni Turtle Creek wilI distzibute itself in such a way as to have an adverse impact to this intersaction. Therefore, after tal.ks with you and Rich Dahm, I have written the attached apgendix to the t~eshold study Which ~ill, t,o the best of my ab~~, ~dness ~+eryone's , . ooncarns. ~ Sincerely, . . ' InZand Pa.cific Fngineering Co. VV Ann L. Winkler, P.E. encl. . cc: Rich Dahm ~ . ~ Cathy Ramm . ~ - ' , ,•C,e~t r' 707 West 7th • Suite 200 .r . , Spokane Washington 99204 I`~ y ` ~2 • 509-458-6840 • . = FAX: 509-458-6844 N . ~ `1 . - . . . . / 5..~ ~ ...DAHM DEVELUPMENT, INC. 509i928-5777 ~ Fax 509/926-4690 12720 E. Nora, Suite E Spokane, WA 99216-1179 , , ~ R VIA FAX/MAII, 509/324-3478 CEIV ED March 31, 1999 - ~ . S°GtCANv COUNiY ENG4PlcER ~ Spokane County Engineers W. 1026 Broadway Avenue "Oj Spokan.e, WA 99260 , ~ Attention: Bill Johns ~ ~,.4 . Re: Turtle Creek d • R' Dear Bill: I am writing pursuant to our telephone conversation on Tuesday, March 30, 1999. 4 • ~ We will complete all items on the attacbed Turtle Creek Phase Z punch list b3(~Mar 3 0, Lg~§. If , we do not have the punch list items done by that date you have my permission to go ahead and . complete the items and use the set-aside funds to pay for the work. ~ I moved the date back a couple of weeks as it has been 12 days since my last letter as we just now received the guardrail detail a.nd do not know their schedule. ~ We will fence the 208 swales and keep the swales fenced off. We wi11 obta.in the cooperation of the builder on this. We do need to work on a sign off system with the building department on 208 swales. truly yours, . , ~ Richard T. Dahm, ~ President RTD:sjb/TCPr.st . ~ , . . cc: Tim Schv~ab - Pacific Engineering, Inc. Inland „ ~ . . . . . . - _ • r. . . ._.ti ` _ ` ~ • ~ , - i A • ~ . ~i ~ •ta ' . .,~;s~~~ `g I . '.~•y' ' _•~,%~"~5 > ' ~ ~ . t ~9*' ' ^'~'1~ti ~ ~ 5.~_ •=~~j'E~g~F ~1f~z?r%•4tLi~.~+:~ r . ~,a- rr+ ~S ✓ 02f03/99 09: 38 puU9 4?~ G(IIIN''1' l~NCINI-f?tl~~ ~(fU~ r - ; , . . . . . ~ PLA.T PUNCH L15T 4FFICE OF TH E S.P4K.,AN E couNTY ENGINEERS , •o _ . PRUJEC'T NAME: T'urtle C:reek ~ -1N5Pli:CTCIR: rlowers 1)ATE: 2-3-99 CQI'I~TZAC:'i'Olt A1vU/UR SU13C'ONTRAC:TUKS: 1Vi«rPliy F3r09./ VVitilclei-,Conc / [►iland Asphalt ~ ~;a~,. • ' --~~..,..~.r..~ . _ - _ • ~ . 1) l.nstA11 guarclrail 5ta 7+ 39 Souttiside 8`" Ave_ ^~M 2) Construcr G' reel Ya(lf atid pl,ice crushect rock behveen e(Ige of paveei pnth riiid edge df roadway. Yw . • .J ~ 3) til5tAl1 Strret sigils. 4) Shupe :tntl tine grnde Pund El. . . ' 6q=wjD 5) Recoiiytruc.t Yondy A, B, CI, C'2, ll, E2, & G. , . ' . ~ ~ ~ 6). C:onitmrferos;on and scdimcnt c:ut►trol sht. 2/'7. . ~ ~ 7) .ptace Road Munurnetii's. ~ T . . I.NSYEG'1'OR'9 SIGNA'I'URE: 4 . . . , • ~ . ~ . .ja • . . ` • - _ . • ' wflt ' ' ' . .s > , .',L~.~' • a . ' , , ' , - • ; n~ , - ` •~z ^~i ' G .411~ ♦ ~ ~ . i~. . ~ . • V yfr ~'~7+'.~".w~ • ~ • ' ~ ; ~ ,'!:j . ' ;dn~ .iR~if'~7` •_S~e~:9;`:3,` . . - ~ . INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. bv~ SPOKANE • COEUR D'ALENE \ ~ . •'.3 ' ~ . RECE! VED May 17, 1999 M'~Y 18 1.444 . w ~r . . - ~ . . . SPpKqNE COUNTY ENui-._ , . ' Spokane County Public Works ~ ~ . Engineering Depa.rtment ~ 1026 West Broadway Avenue ~ Spokane, WA 99260 ~ Attn: Bill Johns, P.E. . Re: Turtle Creek lst Addition I.P.E. #97105 ~ Dear Mr. Johns: This letter is to let you know that the. centerline monuments as shown on the final plat of Turtle Creek 1s` Addition have been set. ~ Sincerely, Inland Pacific Eogineering, Inc. Patrick J. Moore, P.L.S. Survey Manager PJM/cf q . . , _ . ~ a• . CM1~ , . • - 707 West 7th • Suite 200 L Spokane, WA 99204 ~ 509-458-6840 • FAX: 509-458-6844 i'G~•.1- ~p •~~j 'Y - 'f =;~C~ ~ ~c. . _ •4 rY p • n DA_ .r -2 DEVEIAPMENI', 12720 Fast Nora, Suite E _ , ~ . Spokane, Washington 99216-1197 ~ ~ Telephone (509) 92>8-5777 - Fax (509) 926-4690 RECErVED . ~ - . . M A Y 2 0 1999 . . SPOKANE COUN11' ENb►',- . VIA FAX/MALL 509/324-3478 1Vray 19, 1999 . . . Spoka.ne County Engineers W: .1026 Broadway ~ = . Spokane, WA 99260 . ~ Attention: Bill Johns Re: Turtle Creek Phase I ~ Dear Bill: ~ The punch list has been completed on the subject project with the exception of the 208 pond on the end of Greenacres Road. This pond cannot be built due to the construction activity on Phase . II in that area. You may want to check with the inspector Penny Flowers. ~ We would like to have this project accepted by the County. Very truly yours, ~ 'chard T. Dahm, President ~ RTD: sjb/srohnsTC . . . ~ . . . . . . . . " ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . , . , . - - , ~ • ~ - . . , . . - . . . . . . - ~ - y~ - . . _ . . . , . . . . - - . . , ~ ~ • , , S • ~,~f: . . . 1 s - • • p • , ' • ~ . c ~ • . T. ' f • A s . ` . •~y ~ . - , . . . . . - ~ ~ ~ "r'- • • ~ • • ~ •`L `f ~9~ ` , . . . • ~ ; n;u " ~i"~!v~ ' 4 . • ~ ' . • • • , . a ~ ~ . . • " If/f n,y R ~ 1 ~~f p e ~ SA~s- ,~i ~ • . . ~ l (f{ ~ ~ ~ t ~ •t~ ~t' ~ . "=l. P~~ V°rA, s o •~~6-11~ ~P'~ {5093 (509) q2~ . . • ~~#~:,,.e. . ~5 ' - . ;,;~,~',-~''t . p,, 1~~1,~1`~~J`' ry ~J~`'-''-~ t•+r ~ Yp~vs'~71 .~~~Z3 • il _ . _~~'l~yi° ' ,y ~ ~ r F •s~ ~ ~~~~~1'~ xl`.X,R~ry,,~~•^ • 1. - ~~~'.r~~,'~~~ . ~a~~~'~.i~~i~.J►a~yy~i.xaf~,~:, ~ ~ ..-,,4 `~~'~r•"-!%• ♦~,y~,,-. ~ • ~t ' y , r 'ffr'~'W ,e.... "OM `}F'~ f 1. . . ",t ~ , • • hrr ;+.~~~~h':':i. c t~~'.G`~ r i w a o.: K:'if.~ ' . i r' I~"' ~ t a! , e~r,#~. t . ' .~~•tr ^.,~*s~~~t~~ • t,`j.~,,,Y's"':., . • . t} ~~M~S S~`„ nF+ ~ , . M : ~ " ~ f YM/~ ~ t ' i~-~.~•-"~ ~M.~~,'~~=~•; e• ~ ~~T. r-"`"' I/ elv t0. ' , • ` ;~.~.~'.=~r.~q- . s ~ • r• ~~~~~lN~"~'~ p w~9 °~e ~ ''1 • • ~j. ,;Mi r,4^ Ev~ {'~o , - ~ ( f ' . ' ~ ,A Y •I a'; ~ • ~ . :•t,r ' ^ ` I~G•w 3~{~~~"tfr Y~"r} ~ 5 • 3.~,~.~ a v} ~ x.• ' , " ; ,,~t„~i:.~~ . ' ' . ~~r - ~,A_ r' r ~Q~ e `tl ` ? ~ . ~ • " , j~~ j` ' ° ' , ; • ~ Ac'~' - ~ ~ ° •,__~y':~'fGt3 ~~p.~F'. ~r►' x, i6 _ ,y~ _ " T~L..~rlfy. l `t.._~,~.i►' " ~ . fi'wQ ~ ~ /r ;,s ~ , yl~r F~~ ~ r~ . j•" ~ »~Y~•l~s ~ ~ M f. ~ • ^1L~ • w p y '3 ~ ~ : f _ ~ ~3 Ta v ' p: _ : y y , E° ~ y ' `k' ~4 ~ • ✓ , 4• ~ n~ ' y~+~ . ' ^ ~C ~ ~J ~ " , . 1!~ b✓fa'. ~ l ~ V ~ ~ . , ' . s T ~ ~ . • !f ~w :.c: ~f~~~ rA4.ti'A✓~~ 'w + ~ `v'i , , ~ A, ' i • ` , ~ q+►tz%~~ . Ji$'^ 1~ ~ ^ - i , " ~ ' . ~ "f a `3, S' . i , • _ t1 ~ R ' • . " 't iS: _ ~ y f • y_`~•,;1rt'~_' ! ~ ~ i~F~l'1~~.~r - ' ~ • ~:i 'i f~ ~ P ~ ~ , .'Y~ '~'s ~ ~ ~ M y~ ~ ~ . - • . ~ r, r r ~ , A~" ' . , ' ' . , . coye~. sheet) . ~j.u~ ~'his n~g o f page-S (i ~ . ~ * f , ~~~~~~hh~V•"~T ' r' o ~ e a ~'f' • . • ' j~'c'',t.~ ^ n 'lT~ . . _ • ~c. ~`9i~t~ ` S }l~~fAC t ) nph :i~ • r~ ~ " . _ , ,.y . ~j~• j ,1~~m~n~~~~~ a„T~n ' q ' ♦ . - ! ~ • ' ♦ . ~ ` • ' ~ •ti~;, .i~,,r ~ PLAT PUNCH L ST S ♦ 1 y . , . . . OFF CE OF THE SPOKANE . ~ ~ ~ . . . COUNTY ENG NEERS , . p`~~ W Tur#le Creek 2"d Addition - W-v fIowers Otite: 7 i !199 r ONYRACT4RS: Murphy @ros./Vinklef/ $homrock ~ • , ~ y u~1~ ~UBC _ _ v ' - • . . . ° X ' - r' - o.- i , • ♦ s ~rQn-otm"tflndvtds-and-M, ` x-4"-ihic-lc-concrete-sptash--pod; -side-stopes-tha#-are-greoler o-be-cor-ret-~c-d,-dr~o~age=dit~-h=js-required -=--ofI--~access-rood-as-sMvwn-on . • ~ „ ~ . . . ~ . - ~ ` J,4 conirct Mith pand floQr or~, fPE shn check. ~ ~ - . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . f~. ~ . - ~ . .fr. ~ .•=rV* ` •>'s_~'. a , . isC.E_ji~' •'r, ~ r . • .r -a.-~-a, • . S . . I . a~ . _.i. : _ . . '~F~i ; ~ ' -~;-,R . • . •~•1.;~_ t' ~ ' . ~ . % • ' s - . c~ ~ ~ ~ii~ ~ .,,~Z' a V~' " ' • . ' -fti:,~',~:.~ • . ; ;~;.~n. • , `~i~~ " 0998 5i5 6t~5 ~ Sab9 AHdanW .,~,~.9.!.0~.. ~~►~1 L~ -~,~~J,~•-.5.~~ ~ f~~!`~ 0 6 9t9 Z 6 6 0 5 Xv3 5 Z 6 0 6 Z Q/ 6 0 . , - Y..+~ . • 1uamdoiaAaQ umBQ . , ' •Sti ' • x• t ~ . ~v' + ~ • ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING INC. • 707 W. 7th Ave., Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 458-6840 Fax: (509) 458-6844 . ~ . .r • e v ..q TO: SPORANE COIINTY ENGINEERS ~ i ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ li I,~~ ' ' ~i~~ ~Y ~ • p ~ ' _ ~ ~i i~~~l~~lj~~ ~I i~'~~~~~I~~~~i'~I ~'~~~'~i I ~ ~ ~~fli ili i~~ ~ ~ ~~~,i. ` L ~ ' 7i ~.~y ` ( . t~l`I I~'il~i~.,l i~ ~ ~~{i 9 ~.r;~ : - 1026 W B ROADWAY AVE 9 9~,:x~~,<<~, ~ •a: ~ i~~~ , ~ i~~~ `k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i'~~~i I( Ii~ i 1i1~ ~ i~~r~ SPOKANE WA 99260 . . ~ , 'It.: ~ ~ ~ ~f 'i'~, ~ ~ i,i~i~~~~i • 'fi~ ' ~i, - 'y~ . E' ~f `~~~.j; , ,i , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~I~ . ~ ~ ~'~Ei N~~~~~'~ ~i' : t~.;,~rt ' ; ~iti;~jil{ i i~-N~t~I ~il~~~lyiii~ (i ~ i i ~,i~, • , ~~li,~,r,~, .~,;ll I;;'!~. ~ ~a`T~URTbE,~aCREET~. ~ ~ ATTENTION: BILL HEI~IMINGS, P. E. '~T~~E~ ~ i i~ t~ ~ ? ~ '~1 ~6;~ ~ ' ` ~ i'~. ~ r ~li~ ~i ; ~ ii ; ! i i~ ~ , , iu'i;1i ~'r~~ h I ; ~ ~s~ , . ~ii~ ( ;.I►~~ ' ~.r ~,la ,1.5 T~ ~ 1~`i ull~ ~~nll~~d ~~~~il ~ ~h; i~~ I~~'I i ' ~~r` : ~ , ~ • . i{ , ~E , .'j~"i~~ i,'';i ' ~ , , ~ , ~P,~l~ ~ , ~ . i,'~ ~ •i ~ i ~'i~~y~ ~ ~I i ~I' ~i f~~ i t h"' I~ Descriptxon Xerox Prints M ~ Copy of Letter M ~ x~ Original Drawing Contract Documents M~ Work Authorization M ~ Report .s ~ No. Copies Description PurpOSe M~ Information M X~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request Written Approval Signature & Return M~ Remarks BILL: ENCLOSED IS THE ORIGINAL STREET MYLAR OF TURTLE CREEK 1ST ADDITION FOR YOUR REVIE14. ~fal('~ ~3Z ~ • ~ ~ ,S , . r1:ts~ +''4• t , r` . vA` ~Signed: MATT ZARECOR/CF D:\TRNSMT.PMS ` • ` - ~R r~ ~'f • '~t ~ ' • t i ~~►t_fi~.~~r~'(1~ ; + t . - ~ P I ,s 'V m November 24, 1997 . 1VIs Susan Murphy, E.I.T. Inland Pacific Engineering, Inc. 707 West 7`h - Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204 - T - RE: P-1753 - Turtle Creek First Addition . . Dear. Susan: . I received your plan submittal and checklist on 10-29-97. I have reviewed the submittal with Ross . Kelley, PE and we have the following comments: . 1. Plan sheets 1& 7 show the area to the North (Pheasar►t Park Sub.) that the developer, I understand, has agreed to complete the street and drainage improvements for. The plans need to show the drainage improvements that need to be done as part of the road improvement. The ditch needs to constructed._ The swales and drywells may be in so they need to be checked to see if they will work with the approved plan. If they need revisions, these revisions need to be shown on the plans. 2. Plan sheet 7A needs to have a revision to the end location for the 6 foot path. The path should extend to the north far enough to allow users of the path to cross Long Road to the school so they are north of 4`h Avenue. The section drawing for the path shows a 1 1/2 " thickness of asphalt. The minimum thickness acceptable to Spokane County is 2". There is a difference in the drawing for length of guard rail. The text says 100 feet and the drawing shows 110 feet. Please clarify. The road section shown between 8th Avenue and Long road is not dimensioned adequately in the plan drawing to be able to stake the road for construction. Please add additional dimensions in order to adequately locate the limits of the road construction. Please revise and resubmit as soon as possible so that we may resume our acceptance review of this proj ect. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, - William H. Hemmings, PE . rDevelopment Services Engineer/Manager . : . . . . . . ~ , 'r!-,~^•'', ``?~'<{,T' • ~'-T: - 1 • •Y '~1~.. : ° . . :.i „~y? v;•,~:~5~°~ti~l~?~".Tf:~,T,:{?5 rJ~'y~y,!~~~~ 4'Yl~ S ~ ~~;~,r - . ~',T• '~'.r.~l'~`•~~l~ti:i;T ''~1'3'~i:~~4~:~~i1~ « ';i,.l,jl ~,,.~;7~'<~;ii;=' °`.vyr;- tR.,•' ^ J""~' r,j~t'4e,, ~ ' ~ ' ,-~~A•'~ ,t.:'~.:~~~ : ..rt t, 'r ~y~' y;N , ~ .r, ~F~ F,✓!;'Y' 'u~TR;7.;1, ~t T ~ ~.b"J~ i ,:;iFry• d?:~r , • ' ' "+r~~+'y~:. ; 1' • ' ',L: ' • , n i s~ ~ h+~~d N~,~~d.{.~1~~^.:" ir R.~' ~ ~ir~~t."L•~ - - ~ GRAPHIC SCAL.E QN FEET7 cy-' ~ 0 25 50 100 W W',, r:. o ~ 0- ~ ? • ~ ~ ~ p . : 1' = 50' Q 0 , . . . ~ o PP o ~ ~~~a~ ~ . (1) . . Tele hone Clsr. ~ 14" Pine . P Irr. Hyd. eter -Buried Tel Guy . ~ 25 MpH Sign ' Wtr ~I . --Geble A, arker z , . ~ ' . -K ~ . • - • . . . ~ ~ DrUi = •i9 . . . . , ; ~ • ' 13 I . , 14 5 ~ . , : "^{•f. . N~, , Ny ~ \ ` _I } .N r50'TAPER ~ STA. l I+ S I To 12,tO I 8Lc>=D INto EXG. PAVEME~ff P~/+ IniSTALL StoP SIGN AND S7REEiNAME SIGN~ I. ` ~ . - . ' . . , ~ ~ ~ • . , . ' y D , . ~ ~ . ' . . ~ . SPOKANE CDQM'fY 5TAn1DAR0 ~ IFUaT EXISTING v ~ ~ O ~.LrU~ Ava• • 4 . . ~ , . .,+31• . . , ~y+1y S~M • I t .rb . ~ NOTE ~ ANy COWFLICTING lJT1L17!E'- . SHALL BE ~LoCaYFD PRioRTO CpNST'~crioN oF ~OADS OR DRAINAGE FACILITIES. • - p ~ zot I I I I ~ -I K. ~ ~ ~ I R ~ I ~ 1 I ► 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 I i I I a ~ I I I I i I 4 I I I I I.. _I I I I I I I ~ ~ , I I I I I f ~ I 1 4 ~ ~ ~ I I i I { 1 L I i T ' . . ' . . ' r, " ' a ~ 4,~,.:i~.L'i ~ i ek'- •.r n ~ . . . . . ' , ~ ~ ' • , . t .•~,l'~'r ~'X'~~~;.f5"Ax.B.•.".W~~ f T•3:~~}v'iy/. ~ x, 4 . ;f' ~ ~.ll 'x~ v.7r~ • i... ~ 4~'„~~ 7~. k. 'yk~•i . ~ ~i.~ ~ ~s. I'f i~,'! , i'R,rti~"~ r'.~~ ~ i;`• ! s , ~ ~ ~f4~,~~~- 1•"~~°~- `'w„~~ ~tc~~ ;~,if,~,.q:;r, .I~~.:~~ l. ~s.,~~.-' y ' `~,.r~..~~ ~ ~ ~i~ r ~ ~ M1 V• .,~.s;~,.~ : d~l~~ ~~!f!x'' , y r .i-r • , 1. ~»Y'stF ~iG; rtr ~S~k-~"~ •{~-^l .1 r~~ . f ~ ~ _ . '.l•~,Y,~,'~~v~1:~3,j. ~rY: . . . I I . ~ . •~~Q., ~~4vr~i ` . ~~J ' , , ~ ~ ~ ~ i 25' 25' ~4-'i~~~' , , ~ • ; . n . , ; 1 36~}~j5' ~ti''~'.~,.,~:., t~~. , 'I l L ( ti''~~ ~t; ; , v , ~ ; V ~JJl~~k3f/'~~ 4+) 1 4„ E ~~.'t~?~'{4'r:laLti.,a. i.Lh'J~v.~.-.~ ~ ♦ N e, j!,k'• ~ ~ +iw'-+•,f,:a •y,; i , r . ,~i'y~~.'.e'.}! -L" `pP5'; ; "i:' S 1 ; . ~ ~i~ r•v I , , ~ ` ' i,;`i'r'~~ ku^~~} ~ 7, : l"k ~F ~ 'ir•3~''r= . ` ; ~;S.~.I'sNs~'°~;i~ r~'~~' ~ ~Jy'-01p~Y~'<', 7', . . ' ~ • n Si ~ „ ' ~ ^ ; Y~+.4'T[S'~~~.~ r71[~~ ~gfXx~3r~~~~ ;:'~4 : , i~'i.. ..'.ti,J t" I•`±y; e'"Jt';J'.~ ~ r . . ' ~ , _;,1{~`,~ti~s'`~~ ~iW'~ryil;~'f~:~.!.~nn-.,: 'n..~rE,~ ~ +f+-a~ Vu•F ~u,.+pa~ I +-[.i,+S'. I ' ~y~~,;a;k, "~`}~`~r~~~i~;: Y '~'r` ~u:r'~~~„~~' . ' • ' ~ r~~ ~~"r,s.~:vw;' • '~'a`oM ; . • ~ , , ~ ~ yV , y U 1 ~ ~ . s~:rlr,~~:s~~''~ ~ i'ra- r . , ~ ; . Rt~. M1~-~ • " ,y ~ E ~ j~i,~ _ 'H w~•, -~,:r 1'~ y r} a~-, F,. ~:nQ: 4+ ,,~c"~1 '[.CaG~. ~,FJa4 , I . • I ~ . ~ . ~-r . . ^ K ` i.~ ~~~~~~V ~,F. tl~~+,. ~i5~~.., ~ . ~ ~ / ~ V~id1 c~a,',,~~ ~ 1 £ lJ , ~ T ~ ~ r y I . 4~R F4GY. - f~V P ~ N ~~7~F J~'~,~ ~ . • - ~ ~ ~~r3~ ' ~A . ~ ~ry ~as ~t~' SS,-r~.L'.+~.~,~•~ . ` . . 9 ~ _ ' - , ~.a !;W r!~~y ,l~ti:~;d;~~~rlr-l•~, ~ -~'~-+~;:a~.r , , • ~5 T0 50' L.T. Irr, [ u 1 ~ yC(. ~ pp ..t;r,~, v~. ~j~.+~ Av~~~,~" ' ` • . { u ' L tl P`~y~ 1G ~ ~S~ rree lep~f~ane Clsr. ; ~ r- - 24" F, ~ne -o, Lrtility ~~mer ~ ~ ~Bur . . ied Te e~~ C~r . ~dil ~ G~y 62. Ze ~J TVr ~ ~ ~~~C~~~ ~rrt~r . _ . • A•u~'.~ ~r,~~~,< °~s. ~:yr,: , . _ ' B `'r , . , , ~,~,Y,. ;,,..,~;.~~,~a r~, K_•n"`3~ g •I . ~I O~rcrt ,yw,~,;'~~ I • , ~ ~ ~ , . r „ " ; , ~ , , , , ~ _ ~ r~.^ r V t L. ~ S 4~ • e . . z y~y~.~.~ , f , _ ~ .`a",y~ [1y ~ ' Il 4' ~r:f;~411 a ~ I 'y • • ' . ' AVE7 5 UE . ' - ~l~'~Ih"~~,{~~ '-'S¢~~~il?.'f i' _ • • ~ - ~ . ' . I - ' ~ ' , r'a ""j ~ ` • ~ ~ f .i,~ , w ''"i" ~ , , , ~ ~R> t~ . ~ h~^• L~ ~r};.~~'f~ f.. . ~ ~l_ ~ . , ~x e~ R~MovED ' ,TAPER ,.``I TYp~ A D~iY~ y~~'A. f I+ 5 I-ro- ~ .r,-;~ ; e~t,ttiJ',.• - • ~ ~ ~ ~W~~~=~: HYch'o5~'!J THF 'OI TCH At.ONG ND~TH SIpE oF ~lC~M"ri~ AVEr~IJE M~TAL MlxYUR€ oF 3 . ~ SPOr{ANZ Coun~'C~~5(~'°f~TA~IR~p TaP OF GRrq-rr- -7.0 - _ SrAz1ot! 9 4-'7 7- BL.)F Ave.4" . ~ ~ . NOTE : A LlC~~~~~ LA~afl SIJRvEYoF:Z, ~ : ' SI-ALL VEFt IFY STREEZ" GjRAf7-75 SHOW r1 NOTE . SHALL E ~ApS G I JUJ .iv ~ ' ~ • i l E . ~ f f I~ l Z ► `fw i 295.00, S89'38'14"E 25 ~ 362.25 ~ I ~ S89'38,14„E - ~ ~ ~D PONfJ-- F,,~ ~ F ~ ' ,TM1j N I I ' _ • , , ; : • : . ' . . ' ~R FL. . ' . • , f • ~ i tft~ °°k, , t • ~:.,r ~ • ~ ' , , . ~ ~ flRqi►.u~GE FA~a^Enrf~ ~q. 9't~r~ -ro .9 ) FY. , . ~ • ' - ' 1 ~ . . • ~ ~ ; . , ~ , ~ ~ ~ . - ,~o~ 5p` oF ~ 8TM Av~ ' ' . - . ; „ ~ . , M1 • , ' . • ~7 ~ ; . • N ' Z5 8 Hyd~-7 26" Pine' ~ . 4~ 10' Utility Easemen~} , ~ ~ 18 Tree ~ 24„ ~ Pine Utility Easemetit L.._ 362. 25 , 33 , , • , „ • • D'rrc ~ E, • ~ ~ -~6~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ I i~ i' • . 295.00~ 4~ ~ , . . . -7M 9'3B4TW"W . . 9 ° 4- ~TCH~ ~ ~,,.L • . i - , ` , ' . ' . . ~ J 7 , (j C ~ ~+I AVEN U .b ~ r • ~ ' \ 14~~~ E GH~TH W1T • \ . , _ ' ' ' TYPE A a~TEy,T,_ a ' ' r~ ~ ~Ma►/~0' . , - , " ' ~ MEfAL FROAIME -TR~ L,J►.rfY A 1 , ~ ~ . . . . • E To , . . . • ~E oF' EIGHTH AVEfJUa,~ • . , ~ SPoKAi`~- -0 'CH~ '01~ ~H ALONCa NORTH SID . , , Et-~V, :7 J , z0 ToP OF G~ '7rPF- . H~ iF(EO oN SKEET 3- OF 28 , ~ UR~ SPEC STAT~oN 91" ~5 L~¢ ~ ;AN~~ . WtTH -MIX'f 24'1 G• 0 :L--r, OF ~ $TMAvE, , . . a . . • • . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . •-~~SU VEYOR . . ~ - . ' ~~Y~'~,; . ~ ~•=x;..,, ;r;., • ; • . ~ . , ~ ' , ' ~ • . ~ . «.rn LANfl R o N ~ o c. o . o L . ~ ~ I ~ 295.00' 5' ~ S89'38,14"E I 25 ~ ' ~a ~ ~~F+v~` I I R~~• O , . ~ . ~ O . . . w qi P~~.: . . • . ; o sw PoNO Oit AFZF~1, ~Q SQ. F7. ~ ' ~ : I' . • ~ I (FL, : ' . ~ ' . ~ ORAINAG E r . 00R E~EV, 5 8 Irr. . • J D - 'h~~ t . . , '~l~ , , . . - • ~ 26„ PinE 1 o' Utlity Ease-men 18 Tree - r 2q." Pine . ~ ~s ~ ~~~►~E . . . - ~ ~:r;:j.; ~ . ~ ~ IVT~I .B°X ~ ~^n ~ CL~r. w,~ M~ a. • . , . . vl, • ~`f'r'=.::`i- • ' ~1• j>'. ~ . . ~ ~ 295.00~~• 9 , E; , tr, . . - . ~ e , ...I • ~ ~ ~ , N s A ~ ~ E GHTH : . . . . . - ~ ~ N I~ _ a "":'s• t ~ ' ^'i: , _ ~ ~ . • ~ 1REE To BE REMOvEO 7yPE "A VRYWEtI- wrrK . , , ~ . METAL FRAME,~ G~T6~ TYPE HYOR05Er-'D .THE' flITCH ALONe NORTH SIDE OF E(GH7H ~ . i , , . c , ~r~; ~ . -r • ' ' pN ' gHEET 1 3 ; S?OKANECouNTY STANIIAp oF WITH MIXTWRE SPEClFfE~fl ToP oF 20'7C~.0 ' STATior.J 5+0~, ~1 LT. oF ~ BTMAvE. = , • ~ . ' NOTE A LIGEN: fv , , ~ _ , . • ~ ' - ' ' ~ . ' . . ' ~ `z~ , ~ ~ll~' • ' ~ . . , ~ . ~ ~ , . . . ' ~ , _ ~.-n~ c v C F TR ~ . . . • . TYPICA L SECTI 01V : EI GHTH AVENUE ~ - ~ N47'* -TO f~SCALE ~ . JTA. 4+ 9 3."T 7(BEG I N PFZOJEGT ) To STA. I I+ 51 F3EUorj 50'TRANStTION) ; 30~ , 15~ -~a iG~ i► f•Y ; ; / ? ' , . ` , . ~ • -1~ . ' ' 2°10 2.% ~ y x. ,r' -'•3-i' i• ir`~r i., r r r ~ •-,T,r. ~ y, 3 ;~~i~. . • , , • . . ~r . t /i ' ~(s-~ ~ ~ • u ~ / A5PFt4LT CO,,►CP.+-rE PAVEMENT ClASS t• , z, CO MPAGTED DEPTH ~ CKu5HEt7 SuRFACrNG~ Top CoLJr{sE ~ G" GOMPAGTED !-7EPTH (w• S. D.o.T. S PEC~ , • . ~ TBM : 60 d . SPlKE IN AQCNOF~ PULE ~ SE COR►'L1ER OF arM A~E. k BARKER RQAD ~ • , _ , - . . ~ ELEV 3_4' . . • ' ~ ; ~ TYP.1 CAL'SECT~I.ON EIGHTH AVENUE , . . , . ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ . ` , ~ . " NOT.. TO: ,SCALE . - . . , . . - . - - ~ - - . - • - ; • STA. I2.+0I ~ 6EN17 TRANSlTION) ~ ` • ~ To STA. IS+DO BARKFJZ ROA'L7) ~ ~ . ' . i z . • . , , ~ / ~ . ~ ,f ~ ~ I 2 _ _ ! 2 > ~ 2 ' . . . . - ; ~ . . ' ~ , - ` ~r , ' • - ~ 3 i~- . - • ; • • ` ~ ~Z ~ / ~ ~ • ' . ASPW4LT CorsCRE'r'E PAvEMENT, CtASS "B' ~ CoMPaC'7"t:jo I7EPTH ~w.s.fl.o.-r_ SFLC) ~ ` - • - ' ' , ~ . . ~ . . CRt.15FtED SURF'ACING, TOP Goc-3RSE t`~'~ r < 'oMPAG'YED DF..?TH - . _ Wa5h1!'tigtot7 State Eas#ern Region ' - , 2714 N. Mayfair Streek ° V70Department of Transpartation , spokane, WA 99207-2090 Sid Morrison - Secreiary of Transpork,atian (509)324-6000 , . • • , MaI"Ch 42 1996 - W John Pedersor~ ~~~EIV~.D - Spokane County PIanning ~ . ~ _ West 1~]26 Broadway Avenue~~AR 0 7 1~~~ . . Spokane, WA 99260-0240 , SPOKANE CourafY F-NGINEER - p= Re:-Turtle-Cre~kDraft EnA~-oiirr~ental _ , - - - - - - - Impact, StaterrEent 17ear Mr. Pederson: . Than3c you for the opportunity to review the above Draft Environrnentat Ympact Statement . (DEIS). After review of this DEXS the Washingtan State Departrnent of Transportatian has the following commen#.s regarding this study: - 0 Over the last 18 manths ~~DOT has rerriewed several traffic studies conducted for this proposed _deveIopment by Inland Pacific Engineering. As a result of the August 1994 traffic analysis and the projected impacts ta the Barker Roadl1-90 Ynterchange a IVfitigated Determinatian -af Non Significance (MDNS) was issued wh3ch the applicant and ~SD0T cancurred with. In tl~s agreement, the appltcant agreed to design, fund, and construct a tTaffic signal at the Barker Road a.nd eastbound I-90 rarrip terminals' . Due to these previously established thresholds regarding mitigatfa-n in the 1994 M]NS, and the fact that the project has nat changed significantly, the same mitigating measures are , apPrapriate far traff'ic impacts to WSDDT facilities. ThAS fact is recognized on Page 55 of the DEIS, as rnitigatfon that could he required o~the Turtle Creek proposal. a Attached ta this DEIS as Appendix C we -fvund -atta6ed a copy of the iiBarker Road . Traffic Tmpact Analysis and Corridar Study" vvhich we have had several concerns with and -have no't accepted this cor-ridor analysis. 'However, WSDOT concurs wit'h the rnitigation on Page 55 af the DEZS, provided the applicant agrees to design, fund, and constnact -a traffic signal along with the associated impravernents at the Barker Raad'and eastbaund 1- 90 ramp terminaIs, * If the applicant or lead agency desires t❑ change the rnitigating rneasures presented Xn this DEIS we wauld ask that aSupplemental Draft EIS be routed to a11 affected agencies to ensure the.praposed changes could be reviewed priar to the issuance of a Firial EYS. . • " . Mr. Pederson . March 4, 1996 Page 2 ' If yau have any questions regarding the above please feel free_ to contact Leanard Cash in aur Regiona1 Planrdng Office at 324-6199. 5incerely, M F ARD CASH7 .i. ry-yE .UEON Regional Planning Engineer ~ JCL LCClgjf cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engirteers .t r . ~ `1 r. . s•~~ J i~'Z; i ' . S P O K A N1F- C O U N T Y OFFTCE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER ~ A DNLSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Memorandum DATE: March 4, 1996 - TO: John Pederson - FROM: Tammie Williams` ) yRE: Turtle Creek Preliminary Plat - DEIS Comments The proposed plat is impacted by a Special Flood Hazard Area as identified by the Flood Insurance Rate Maps. All work must conform to the requirement of the National Flood Insurance Program and Chapter 3.20 of the Spokane Counry Code. A Floodplain Development Permit will be required from this office prior to work taking place on any property a portion of which is in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. General requirements for development in o'r around this floodplain will include: • No impact to the 100 year base flood elevation due to work in or around the floodplai,n. If . work is proposed in the floodplain (filling, grading, structures, etc.) a floodplain analysis and plans must be completed by an engineer licensed in the State of Washington to show no impact to the floodplain. This analysis and plans must be accepted by this office prior to issuance of a Floodplain Development Permit. • No increase in storm runoff may be discharged to the 100 year floodplain due to development of the site. • No lots may be created which are wholly withi.n the identified 100 year floodplain. Each lot must have a suitable site for building outside the floodplain. . • All structures must be elevated to have lowest floor including basement floor at least 1 foot above the base flood elevation established on the current Flood Insurance Rate Maps. • Plans show a crossing structure over the identified floodplain. This structure must be designed to span the 100 year floodplain without impacting the base 100 year flood elevation. A detailed floodplain analysis and plans completed by an engineer licensed in the State of Washington must be prepared to show no impact to the floodplain. This analysis and plans must be accepted by this office prior to issuance of a Floodplain Development Permit. W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456-4715 . 1 . 4~. .f~ • ) ' . . INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. August 26, 1994 W.O. 94221 Spokane County . Plaaning Department 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 Atta. Pat Harper RE: Amendment to Threshold Determination for a Traffic Impact Analysis for the Proposed Preliminary Plat of Turtle Creek, a Residential Project Dear Pat: As a result of our meeting on August 23, 1994, we have reviewed the threshold study for Turtle Creek. We felt there was a need for a formal amendment to the threshold study and expanded mitigation. Therefore a more detailed analysis was done and this letter is the formal communication to you of the results and additional mitigation needed. Background Informaxion As an introduction to this amendment, some basis for the additional data is needed. • Traffic was generated according to the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Sth Edition. • Traffic from Turtle Creek was distributed as described in the threshold study. • Riverway Villa was assumed to have only completed Phase 1(40 single family homes). • Traffic from Riverway Villa was distributed so that half of it went south on Barker Road to the freeway. • Traffic from Riverway Villa was not distributed south of the freeway interchanges. • Affects from Riverway Villa were separated from the affects of the growth in non site specific traffic. • Each phase of Turtle Creek was analyzed separately. Turtle Creek is divided into three phases. The total development consists of 101 single family . homes configured to meet the UR-3.5 zoning. The first phase consists of 55 units, the second phase has 14 units and the final phase has 32 units. 707 West 7th • Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509-458-6840 FAX: 509-458-6844 ; - ~ Levels of Service The Highway Capacity Software was used to find the levels of service for different situations for the intersections of interest; namely Barker Road & the westbound I-90 on/off ramps, Barker RQad & the eastbound I-90 on/off ramps and Barker Road & Appleway. These three 41. • ~ intersections were looked at for impacts due to the additional traffic from Turtle Creek at Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3; complete build out. The affects from Riverway Villa were separated from the non-site specific growth of traffic. The existing levels of service are shown here for a comparison with the data generated for this amendment. Table 1- Existing Level of Service . :~~X ~T N~'r~:.:.:~. :.P~. M~:~.~:;:.:.:;~.:::;:.;;: :=~M:: ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ;.:.:D-...~:~..~:~.:~:.:~: ::DELAYr%~ ~I:~S:~~~ ~S. . ~ : ~ : : . .CA~. . Westbound I-90 Ramps & Barker Road 226 pcph C 137 pcph D Eastbound I-90 Ramps & Barker Road 322 pcph B 106 pcph D Appleway & Barker Road 6.4 sec B 7.2 sec B * Unsignalized intersection, LOS expressed as reserve capacity in passenger cars per hour (pcph) The levels of service for each intersection follow next. The different phases refer to the phases of Turtle Creek as described previously. Note that the level of service at the unsignalized intersections steadily decreases with an increase in traffic, whether from tbe addition of a project, or just the projected increase in traffic from non-site specific sources. Table 2- Level of Service for Barker Road & the westbound I-90 ramps (expressed in reserve capacity as passenger cars per hour) AM peak hour PM peak hour No Riverway Riverway No Riverway Riverway Projects** Villa & Turtle Projects** Villa & Turtle only Creek Only Creek Phase 1 D 193 D 187 D 171 D 112 D 103 E 100* Phase 2 D 163 D 156 D 136 E 89 E 82 E 78 Phase 3 D 135 D 129 D 102 E 67 E 60 E 54 With only Turtle Creek and -no Riverway Villa, the level of service is D with a reserve capacity of 108 pcph - Non-site specific growth only , . ` . Table 2 shaws that the aevel of service du.ring the PNi peak houx wili fa11 ftom D to E right away. 'T'his decrease wi1 occur under either o-f the faRowing circumstances; the increase in traffic expected to occur during the next two years without either Riverway Vi11as ar Tu.rtYe Creek having their respective Phase 1 bui,ld out carnpleted, or in the next yeaz' if both of the developmeats have cornpleted t.heir fi~.rst ghases. L.evel of service E is the 1owest acceptable level of servnce and will be maxntainecl throughaut the build out of Turt1e Creek. Table 3 Level of Service at Barker Road & the eastbound 1-90 ramps (expressed in reserve capacity as passenger cars per hour) AM geak hour PM peak haur No Ri,rrer. way Riverway & No Riverway Rir~erway Prvjects" Villa Tu.rtle Projects" Villa & Twge only Creek Only Creek . , , Plase 1 C 293 C 286 C 268 E 70 E 58 E 51 ~ Phase2 C265 C 259 C 239 E33 E 20 E 12 Phase 3 C 238 C 232 C 204 F -9 F -22 F -35* , ~ ~With only Turtle C5reek and no Riverway Villa, the level of service is F with a reserve capacity of -23 pcph _ Non-site specific growth only Tahle 3 shows that the level of service at the intersection of Barker Raad and the eastbound 1-90 ram~~ duriag the complete build out of Turtle Creek will remain at C duri:ng tae A1Vi peak haur. During the PM peak hour hovc~ever, the aevel of service wiXl fa1l frvm E, the lowest acceptable level, to F which is an unacceptable level of service. This decrme in level of service is due orly to the grawth of traffic not associated with awy particular project. Rivervvay Vi1las and Tur#le Creek, wi11 reduce the reserve capacity fuzther into level of service F, as they have done in every other circurnstance. Table 4 - Level of Service at Barker Road & AppXeway (expressed in seconds of delay) AM peak hour PM peak hvur No Background No Background Projects" & Turtle Projects" & Turtle ~ Creek Creek Phase 1 B 6_5 B 6.5 B 7.3 B 7.3 Fha,se 2 B 6.5 B6.5 ~ B 7.4 B 7.4 Phase 3 Bb.6 B 6.6 B 7.5 87.5 - IVon-site specitic growth only . . , . . . e - The level of service at the i.ntersection of Barker Road & Appleway continues at B into the future aeyond the build out year for Turtle Creek for both the AM and PM peak hours. As shown in the threshold study, however, this is not sustainable into the distant future. Additional Proposed Mitigation ~ As a result of the data gathered for this amendment, we would like to propose additional ' mitigation to svpplement that which was proposed in the original threshold study. The additional mitigation we are proposing is as follows: Phase 1 o Pave Long Road from 8th Avenue north to the existing pavement • Provide a hard surface pedestrian walkway on the east side of Long Road with the new pavement The traffic from Turtle Creek will use Long Road, and due to Spokane's air quality problems, specifically PM-10. paving Long is imgortant. Also children from this area will be attend.ing Greenacres Elementary School at the intersection of Long and 4th and need a separate walking area. Both of these measures needs to be complete at the start of this development. Phase 2 • Install a signal at Barker Road and the eastbound I-90 ramps • Put up to 10% of the cost of upgrading the signal at Barker Road & Appleway into escrow for future upgrade of this signal The PM peak hour level of service at the eastbound I-90 ramps will fall to unacceptable levels of service within the next three years. Installing the new signal with Phase 2 will prevent this from happening. This intersection with a signal will function at level of service B at build out and will have good level of service for many years into the future. Getting the signal at Barker Road and Appleway off span-wire and onto metal poles is a short term goal of Spokane County - which we wiil partially fund. Turtle Creek is estimated to be about 35 % of the growth anticipated at this intersection, however, compared to the overall traffic volumes through this intersection, 'Iu.rtle Creek is only about 5% of the total traffic. Therefore as an intermediate value which is acceptable on all sides, we are recommending that Turtle Creek participate 10 % in the upgrade of this signal. Phase 3 • Widen Barker Road to 30' with a 2' shoulder on one side ,~r/ n~u piflo~ Barker Road at present is built to rural road standards. It is, however, classified as a arterial and needs to be widened if it will be required to handle very much more traffic. Therefore we will pave out one side of Barker Road from Appleway to 8th Avenue to 30' with a two foot paved shoulder on one side. It is anticipated that pedestrians, bicyclists and horse back riders vvill use this shoulder. / . - ) , ) . . G - . 1 • t?fl We hope that this amendment to the original threshold study will answer any questions you may have and will allow us to continue to have a September hearing date. Sincerely, Inland Pacific Engineering Co. ~ ~ , Todd R. Whipple, P.E. TR'W/alw encl. ~ cc: Leonard Cash ~ c~ • = • ° , , , • Wa5h1ngton SfatQ Dis#ract B De~7a~"t1~'1ei"1t of T1'a1"~S~?ortatIQ~'1 2114 ~lorth Ma}fair S#reet ~ ~ Spokane, 1lVA 99207-2090 . aetane Berentson SecreEary oi Tra nsporta tian (509) 456-3000 Fax (549) 456-3089 ' AuguSt 29, 1994 i'qA~V ' r ToI11 Vel]1c ' • . . • r SpOkarie C01k21ty PImI11ng - West 1026 $r0aduray Avenue ' SpOkane, WA. 99260-0240' - ~e: Turtle Creek MI]NS - Dear Nlr. Ve]jic: ~1r5: r After reviewing the arr~ended traffic stud}r that vvas pravided be.the applicant for the TurtTe •d ~ Creek developrnent, the Washington State Depaxtment of Tratisportatian (W5~OT) has the: foflowing comrneflts: 1. The amended traffic study dated August 26th, 1994 recognizes that without i.rnprovernents at the south Barker Road and 1-90 ramp temiinals LOS "F" would exist at an unsignalized intersection, which is unacceptable. To rr~itigate this LOS a signal systern is proposed for -this intersection in the traffic study. At the present time WSDQT is unable ta fund tlis proposed signal system, and, must rely on the deveIoperlapplicant to fund this impravernent. We would request that the installation of this signal system, at develvpers ; expense, be included as a mitigating measure in tlne MDNS. To pravide for tl~s signal - system we wou]d request that the follow-ing language be used in the MDNS for this signal: The appliccrntlowner shall insia21 a signal system at the Bcrrker .Raad and .I 90 . south rarnp terminals after completion of Phase I(55 lots) and prior to Phcrse 11. Yhe rnstallatron of this sigpal shall cansrsi of designing, providing the signal and relaied equrpmentIfixtures, arrd installatron of al1 equiprnent or providirag WSDOT the funds rrecessary ta do so. 77iis signal system -wr'll also need to conforrn to the applzcable WSDOT de.sr`gn stcxndards. Prior to the rnstullcxtiorx o, f! . thrs signal rr WSDOT clevelopers crgreerrtent will need to he executedfor -work orz State rights of way. Withaut this needed niitigation adequa#e facilities would nat exist at the sout-herly rarnp tenn~nals necessary to accommodate this praject as identi.fied in the traffic study. . 2. Current federal and state regula#ions require that roadway irnprovements in a non- attainment area which affect either an arterial ar regional1y significant facAity_to carnply - with air quality confvmrdty requirements. Beeause of this, the County andJor WSDO'x` may require an air quality canformity ana.lyses far roadway improverrrents reIated ta th.is pi-aject. . . . t. • R • ~i.o'o F~ :e. ~ Q_ , . - . 1 . ,b ~ 1C NU ~Je1'29' 1994 Leon~d C~h in Au~St free to conta~ page 2 the aboye please ~eel . . . ions regardmg 456 ' 996' . ueSt 509~ ~ y Smcetelyl 1~f ou ~'ave any gO~ce at C our ~istriCt pla~~ . . neer . LEpl~ A~ .Eng r;; i::,N ( :e' ' • ~`'y.•i.t,s~,•.~j;~L~~, ' ' . . "s*'~•{~,~~ . SCL erS LCCWf ne CountY Eng' nee~,ng . ~ t~:`. Spoka En~ at ~~rper~ Wand p ac . dd ~ipple, . .f o . . . .r . • :t.~;~ . ~ • . . . ,~':h • • ' . ~ , • c. L j .,y • • r• • • i G . 2~~ f^ } ~ • •A~~ . ~ ' f f ~ c;!--iti.~`R ~~Y.~' - ~ j • - . . =,'+cr,~.~i ~3~~`A=`Z~`--~~. `r„ `T a~•"^~ ' ~ ~;g~~ ~y~•q~r,.F,~.~..~ '~.`>.:{~"5[,'s~ ' ~ ~ ~+~".~~~`'S< 1 ~r •3~` . I ~ ~ X~ ~ti`~~'~'. Y ~;~-,ti" m•- 5s';:i' ~~~~+~`,o= ~,;::,r},`- .S ~G r f',~.K a'g_~`t.k ..`~7~~i.t .'~+i.: 4 ~ ~ .,a • a~ f i'~~C'~ ~S ~ - ' • . Y ric. .7 - _ - - ~ : M•;x~.. Eb ~ - - ~3 ~ • ' ' ;sFORMEp L~y~,aT~~b''~' rh~nt"~lyiM~ ~ro''.'L ~ -t ~r i;~_::,^-.•1`•,.`tws• , . j. ~ September 16, 1999 RECEIVED • zs+~r;~: v~ ° -i.y ~y ; t% s l. j• .Ya~ 1~vv.`:.F.r: }',f' : ~'=Z'2:~ ' ~ , m~^ ~,Z~?'v4l~{ "~6'^x ~~.._-•`~--4..Y~~S1,~"4' n.~~fT -T y. v i999 ~ W.O. No. 98617 ~ S EP 1 7 ~ ~~S~fO~angj:,~ • :E~ : : :,~Q~~58~~684,:s=-~~ K . . . , x~• ;.~.~~~-q ~ ~z~;~~~,~ SPOKANE Greg Figg ~ COUNTY ENGINEER. P4~ r:.,•$~~s ~-~ar ~r ~:~s;3;uw- e r ~ ~ ,.;yT''i~•>'y ~y;,.r'='N~~•2:~' ~ 1 , WSDOT Planning r~ ~'r-13~S_•S"-r .}-~:C~,.~.... .rr: i.. -e, ~ ~ ~ ~ . N. 2714 M~ayfair St. ~;:~~~~~w '-x'~-~"~a..,~ r~ • ~ ~ 3aefi'~u ` =c3`' 6~ ~ • ~L~;.~;♦~~=Spokane, WA 99207-2090 . . . : ~ S ~ay_"-"iy~'tS~i. / {/1 w`.y~~,."='c~ ~`~i~'' ~ S C/~"'[ e.~~'1 f ✓t ~~;.'~Fi7ti; y,-~~:3'c A!t Z y n,nt.:.~: . • J ~ ~ d I- arker Road r`n4 RE: Westboun 90 Ram ps and B F , p c . ~t'• , ~ Traffic Analysis . - - - , i~"t~'Y~~.°tit,~C~~: 17ra1~ r~'T• . :1~~'•1 •y~. ~s =K $~~~4~:~R~.:,~=ti~~ ~ Dear Greg: ~r ~~j~ ~ • ,,`~r,~f~i M• ~3~,- ~~v~._:v.:;%7!,-sic~~:p r.t:t6 ' - . ~R~~ •n 2 ~~'.,',i` i ~4Y H • - ' As part of the requirements from the Hearing Examiner conditions for each phase _ ne of the Turtle Creek South project, a traffic analysis was completed to determi 'what if any transportation improvements are needed at the westbound I-90 ramp/Barker Road intersection. This letter serves to document the findings of s ~i a~?~~;`~ ~ ~:••j ' i~~ ` ~ti ` ~4 ~ thi s analys- Is. f l ~ ~ ~1 t~+`7'SJ ~ • ` The firaffic during the PM peak hour at this . intersection was counted on April 1, ~ ti.«4 ~ ;`~1999> a typical weekday. Using the 1997 HCS software> ver. 3.1b> level of ~:''?k<;,~ r}. ~r;• „e.~ .i,'~~r service calculations were performed. The existing level of service during the PM peak hour is LOS B with 14.5 seconds of delay for the westbound approach. In the attachments are level of service calculations. ~y,~Y~ ~~``.i:r' i:+a~i0'.`'Pr• 6. From discussions wi th you and Spokane County regarding background trips ~~'`~~~L. ~~~~~~~~~'`•;~°°~,r~ (trips which are anfiicipated to be consfiructed by the year 2000) you have requested that we include tri ps from lots anticipated to be built and occupied in 7=.~ j y~ r_y ~ L'~~"~%t~', n"~ 1'F~- "~~~'`"sl'~c. the Turtle Creek project (phases 1& 2), Riverwalk project (4"', 5`h, 7`'' and 8l') . and a first phase Mission Meadows. These background pro. ~ects are in vanous _~.t; _ ~•9. ; nt:~ stages of construction and some have lots with occupied homes. The number of - , a: 4 , ~ ; ~ •_;~w • • unoccupied lots was determined at the time of the traffic counts. In the 1~`~'.~' 7:iL '-ij".4'[•13i1 ~-~.~i~~l'4 i • . • 0;~t7:~ attachments is a calculatlon sheet show. ~ng the tnps that will be added due to these background trips. ; • ; f ~`Ar~-~ M"'~:.: < ti -i ~i ~r~' y : 4' •`f A~,;-~:-' 4'~'~'':ri v~^+~': ~y:;'`; ~~~.e;~~ The first phase of Turtle Creek Soufih will construct 41 lots. In the attachments v~-s~~-~.~~ . , . • , . are calculations showing the trips anticipated to use this intexsection during the , `=PM peak hour. These trips were added to the existing and background turning ;,.~.i -C"'~'~v; ~~,a ~ ~<ti,•z'?. ~-~,,?.'~.3 movement volumes to obtain traffic volumes anticipated with Phase 1 of Turtle t+~r~{'~ ti ~,~{",~~•='~'~i'i~ i>-~~ ~,.i ; : • Creek South. Level of service calculations under this condition showed that ~~~7"~~~' ;•~~~~~'M.'~i~~,', i.i ~ level of service at this intersection will be LOS C with 20.2 seconds of delay for - the eastbound ap1 7{'J~roach. This level of service is well within the limits for = P acceptable levels of service without further improveme n t s n e e d e d. T h e r e f o r e' n o " ,:L.....~_ .t-• ~ ~ , •:n ng ,,,ee improvements are needed at this intersection for Phase 1 of Turtle Creek South. . W. ~~r 4'"• ~;'3~~F { Ai'C~i~er~u'r,e l~0~~'%~~._r17L~~"'' ~~:L=an ,~1~. T~, ~yy-Y~+ az,. • . . ~'L~4Y1Y~! A t~~~MI ` Q~ ' l.r. • ~ • iL':n:~'~~ ."l'. ~1 . " • It should be noted that during the construction of lots which are currently in construction, a significant amount of traffic is generated during the PM peak hours which will go away once the . construction is completed. Therefore, the traffic counts taken have extra trips which are : construction related and could be subtracted from the existing traffic counts. However, these . ..;~'construction trips were not subtracted from the counts and are included in both existing and :future Ievel of service calculations. va If you have any further questions regarding the traffic issues for this project, or if this does not meet your requirements for the analysis of this intersection, please feel free to give me a call. : Sincerely, Inland Pacific/CLC. Timo i y A. Schwab, P.E. Proj ect Manager - TAS/tas cc: Pat Harper, Spokane County Engineers Rich Dahm, RT Development, LLC file Attachments p ~ v ~ • ~ 1 . Rfks a- 17 ~s ~ SPd~~ Co . Dcs r~, R~-rto,~ 511 ~~q`~ i ~A^ • 'y N 41 LoTe-~. ~v /.oi py.4 pa~atm/t - 41 779~ts; CZp -rF-1?5 ~ C ( 5~ 7"F ~ P5) 0 S, o rv-owL Ar-m dqx-i"o ~F T-4d ev gmr44 ~ ltz~ P sR 7ipev l TrL rP Ng T t~► - Azt,A Wrsr dr- 8Ae*,-6p- 67,w Z-q v g-r~irs Ng c,- , t ~r 3~5 /f~oau SP~Py44~~R~PPt.~w~r ~ottz+~.~- ~ ~ 4~ociAlD eo, i ~TS pi+ t EPR-2 ~ Pi4 I~ ~d Lor5 NoT 04currt-o.~ Pa z, za Cvrs ~jr'pT-/~ 3 S La-f$ ~S. ~ • • - ~~c~_f~~ ~f~_P_s_~~ . _ ~ -~T 1~ ~ Qrt.L_ t 0 ~ t' ~ o (o /i~ut I-tK6e► NOP-TO OF ?-10 Os/ &*K&2 59 'TN~v l 7rztP~g 50 LgfA T dF PAqL ga- cp T Q o -77c-4es Ng LT _ / O O~ ~1~ZW L^17r OF FA& 4r-- -OiU -C-,f G- ~ Ir> ~g T /ficOm g ` b ~ ~ t~ Lo Ts 1VCr- WA LK 414t S /o LoTS Zo Zf'`~ P ~ `roTAL - G 4 LoTs 64 l~oTs Ti P511o.r - 6s7t~~f~, ~clra ~o~+ G~ ~ qo D..,~ . ~ So AF-tA Prs-r ~F Xg4c ~ T-~o I1 '1'F4Q5 Ng -t'E,~v r► TftiPs sB kr . ~ - - - 14 ~ JO /rR4m t'tQo E'~'lf OF &gv-,ve oN -L-9o 4 rx,T Fs LT Z~~~TS Sg Ti~Rv , t s¢ , v ~ ~ 1 ssro~ ~~~u~s - 1~s~ 1 Or GPrs G~~~~ S~ 1~ ~~9 - - - ~ O~c~~,~p~~_2o00 13 t~ - 44 44 56 Pm cq-- P,.x- Twrs~ _ - z 5 ~~t s. 15 /N ` ` Y Tr_ ~oy C~Z °ln , ~3 $ O ° ~ fJS~ S~p ~4STRtt~~-no,~ ,4~s f'+vcg u4,,,i.~e- - Aw J"2~ ~F r-~ ON N~Gf~ ~ .so ~~0 Z 7~g T r~~ 5 Sg ~T 10 &W~ i,/ ZS °fe ~~Oa~ S~~Fv~ W~-Y CoR.~rvo~ (4 r No eOV-~_T 0 CoJ✓S-ret,-r W Ns 1&-i o--p c (ht- ~ M CADO(A.) - , - z ~ _AA ~ + 2 g-r• v ~ - . . . E g Lr ~ 4tz ~ . J ~ ~ IZT. 2 3 E . J . PROJECT NUMBER: 98617 11-May-99 INTERSECTION; Barker Road & I-90 WB Ramps PM PEAK HOUR INITIAL COUNT DATE ~ 1999 YEARS TO BUILDOUT ~ 0 COUNT RATE TO EXSTNGI NIS GROWTH RATE ~ 0.02 NIS ENV E/W GROWTH RATE I 0.02 BUILDOUT GROWTH FACTOR ~ 1.000 1.000 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ) 0,9 20 YEAR GROWTH FACTOR INITIAL MOVEMENT EXISTING BACKGROUND BLDOUT YR PROJECT BUILDOUT COUNT. TRAFFIC VOL TRAFFIC W10 PRJCT TRAFFIC WIPRJCT 36 EB LT 36 6 42 42 13 EB TH 13 13 ' 13 28 EB RT 28 2 30 3 33 44 WB LT 44 44 44 52 WB TH 52 52 52 32 WB RT 32 32 32 88 NB LT 88 7 95 8 103 385 NB TH 385 44 429 1 430 72 NB RT 72 72 72 . 20 SB LT 20 20 20 361 SB TH 361 13 374 1 375 111 SB RT 111 16 127 127 ~ EXISTING LOS= II FUTURE LOS = , , , HCS: Unsignalized interse., Release 3.1 b . TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analyst: Tim Schwab Intersection: WB RampslBarker Road Count Date: 411199 Time Period: PM Peak ~ Intersection Orientation: North•South Major St. - Vehicle Volume Data: ~ Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Volume: 88 385 72 20 361 111 44 52 32 36 13 28 HFR: 98 428 80 22 401 123 49 58 36 40 14 31 PHF: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Pedestrian Volume Data: Movements: Flow: lane width: Walk speed: 9'o Blockage: Median Type: None #of vehicles: 0 Flared approach Movements: # of vehicles: Easibound 1 # of vehicfes: Westbound - 1 Lane usage for movements 1,2&3 approach:• j lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 . L T R L T R L T R . Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 4,5&6 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R ~ Y Y Y N,~ . N N N N N' Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: Lane 1 lane 2 Lane 3 ~ L T R L T R L T R Y Y. Y N N N N N ~ N Channefized: N Grade: 0.00 lane usage for movements 10,11 &12 appraach: Lane 1 lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N~ N N ~ F, Channelized: N ~ Grade: 0.00 Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 385 361 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 72 111 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 ~ Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 . length of study period, hrs: " 0.25 ~ Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Folfow-up time calculation. ; Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 . t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 tc,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,it 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: ~ 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 . ~ tc I stage 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1- 6.2 , Follow Up Time Calculations: ~ Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 ~ tf 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 468 463 Potential Capacity 595 599 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 595 599 ~ Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 0.95 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 508 524 Potential Capacity , 1057 1042 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1057 1042 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 • 0.91 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.97 0.87 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 Conflicting Flows 1232 1211 Potential Capacity 177 182 ~ Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt - 0.85 0.85 Movement Capacity 150 154 Probability of Queue free St. 0.61 0.91 , Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 Conflicting Flows 1193 1217 Potential Capacity 164 158 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Maj. L, Min T Impedance factor 0.77 0.52 Maj. l, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.82 0.62 ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.78 0.59 Movement Capacity 127 92 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calcufations Movement 7 8 9 11 12 ~ . ~ v(vph) 49 58 36 40 14 31 Movement Capacity 127 150 595 92 154 599 ~ Shared Lane Capacity 171 148 Worksheet 9•Computation of effect of flared minor street approaches Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ Csep 127 150 595 92 154 599 Volume 49 58 36 40 14 31 Delay 49.9 43.4 11.4 71.0 30.7 11.3 Q sep 0.68 0.70 0.11 0.79 0.12 0.10 Q sep + 1 1.68 1.70 1.11 1.79 1.12 1.10 round (Qsep +1) 2 2 1 2 1 1 n max 2 Z C sh 171 148 SUM C sep 872 ~ 846 n 1 1 C act 522 497 Worksheet 10 delay,queue length, and LOS Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 - ~ ~ ( ( v(vph) 98 22 142 86 C m(vph) 1042 1057 522 497 v1c 0.09 0.02 0.27 0.17 95% queue length ~ , Control Delay 8.8 8.5 14.5 13.7 LOS A A B B Approach Delay 14.5 13.7 Approach LOS 6 B ' Worksheet 11 Shared Major LT Impedance and Delay Rank 1 Delay Calculations Movement 2 5 . P oj 0.91 0.98 V-~1 385 361 V i2 72 11l - ' - S i1 1700 1700 S i2 1700 1700 P- ai 0.87 0.97 1) mai left 8.8 $.5 N number major st lanes I I Delay, rank 1 mumts i.1 0.2 HCS_ Unsignalized Interse, ; Release 3.1b T1NO-WAY STQP CONTRO~(TWSC) ANALYSIS Analys#: Tim Schwab lntersection:W8 RampsIBarker Road Count Date: 1999 wr background & TCS Ph. l Time Periad: PM Peak ; Irrtersection Orientatian: Nurth-South Majar St. - Vehicle VolUme Data: Movements: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 U 11 12 - Volume: 1U3 430 72 20 375 127 44 52 32 42 ] 3 33 HFR: 114 478 80 22 417 141 49 58 36 47 14 37 PHF: 0.90 190 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0,90 0.90 0.90 PHV: 0.02 0.02 0.02 0,02 0.02 o.o2 0.02 0.02 0.02 H2 0.02 0.02 ' Fedestrian Uolume Data. . Movements: Flow: Lane wtdtfi. - Walk speedo °lo BEockage: Median Type: Nane # af vehicles: D . Flared appruach Movements: ff of vehicles: Eastbound I # of wehieles: WestboUnd I Lane usage fnr movements 1,2&3 appraach: ; Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R - y Y Y N N NN N N Channe[ized: N Grade: HD Lane usage far movements 4r5&6 approach_ Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R L T R L T R • Y Y Y N N N N N N , - Channelized: N ~ Grade: 0.00 Lane usage for movements 7,8&9 approach: lane 1 Lane 2 lane 3 . L T R L T R L T R Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 lane usage for movements 10,11 &12 approach: Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 L T R l T R L T R ~ Y Y Y N N N N N N Channelized: N Grade: 0.00 ~ Data for Computing Effect of Delay to Major Street Vehicles: Northbound Southbound , Shared In volume, major th vehicles: 430 375 Shared In volume, major rt vehicles: 72 127 Sat flow rate, major th vehicles: 1700 1700 ~ Sat flow rate, major rt vehicles: 1700 1700 Number of major street through lanes: 1 1 Length of study period, hrs: 0.25 • Worksheet 4 Critical Gap and Follow-up time calculation. . Critical Gap Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t c,base 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 t c,hv 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 t c,g 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t 3,1t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t c,T: 1 stage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00 0.00 ic . 1stage 4.1 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.; 6.2 Follow Up Time Calculations: Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 t f,base 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 t f,HV 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0_9 0.9 0.9 0.9 P hv 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 - tf 2.2 2.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 Worksheet 6 Impedance and capacity equations Step 1: RT from Minor St. 9 12 Conflicting Flows 518 487 Potential Capacity 558 580 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 558 580 .Probability of Queue free St. 0.94 0.94 Step 2: LT from Major St. 4 1 Conflicting Flows 558 558 ~ Potential Capacity 1013 1013 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 Movement Capacity 1013 1013 Probability of Queue free St. 0.98 0.89 Maj. L Shared In. Prob. Queue Free St. 0.97 0.84 Step 3: TH from Minor St. 8 11 ~ Conflicting Flows 1349 1318 Potential Capacity 151 157 Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 ~ Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.81 0.81 Movement Capacity 123 128 Probability of Queue free St. 0.53 0.89 t Step 4: LT from Minor St. 7 10 . Conflicting Flows 1304 1325 Potential Capacity 137 133 . Pedestrian Impedance Factor 1.00 1.00 . Maj. l, Min T Impedance factor 0.72 0.43 Maj. L, Min T Adj. Imp Factor. 0.78 0.55 Cap. Adj. factor due to Impeding mvmnt 0.74 0.51 Movement Capacity 101 68 Worksheet 8 Shared Lane Calculations Shared Lane Calculatians Movement 7 8 9}r; "11 12 ~ E v(vph) 49 58 36 47 14 37 Mavement Capacity 101 123 558 68 328 580 ; Shared Eane Capacity 140 133 - Worksheet 9-Camputataon Of effect af flared minor street approaches Movement 7 S 9 10 11 12 G sep 101 123 558 68 128 580 Vnlume 49 58 36 47 14 37 . Delay 70.3 5U 11.9 133.1 36.1 11.6 Q sep 0.96 0.93 0.12 1.73 0.15 0.12 ,Q sep + 1 1.96 1.93 1,12 2.73 1.15 1_12 round (Qsep +3j 2 2 1 3 1 1 n max 2 3 C sh 140 113 SUM C sep 781 776 n 1 1 C act 460 334 Warksheet 10 defay,queue length, and tOS Mavement 1 4 7 8 910 11 12 ~ ! v(vph) 114 22 142 98 Crn(vph) 1013 1013 460 334 v{c 0.11 U2 0.31 , 0,29 95% queue length ; Control Delay 9.0 8.6 16.3 2U . LQS A A C C Approaeh oelay 16.3 20.2 Approach LOS c C Worksheet I 1 5hared Major LT Irrfpedance and Delay Rank l Qeray Calculations Movement 2 5 P ej 0.59 Q.98 Vil 430 375 . = V i2 72 127 - - S i l 1700 1700 S i2 1700 ]l~0 P} oj 0.84 0.97 D maj reft 9.0 3.6 N number major st lanes 1 1 Qelay, rank 1 mvm#s 1.4 0.3 'rq"• 1 A i l • • ' ~l• • M-EMO r51 • TO: John Pefersfln, Spokane Caunty Planning . FROM: Fat 14a-rper, Spokane Cvunty Engineering ~ . . 'I11 DATE: . IVIarch 17, 1995 SU3JECT: "Turtle Creek Traffic analysis . FILE: Tut-tle Creek, PE 1753 - John, please be advised that Spokane Cauuty Engineering has reviewed the updated Turt,le Creek traffic analysis and subsequcnt Appendix A, and concu.~ -with its findings. Additional conditions ~ ofapproval are contained in Appendix A. This item is ready, from County Engineeziangs opinion to'be brought back to the Board. - - ~ Post-it- Fax Note 7671 Da:e ~fy- Ipage~► ~ . ro ) 0cv W H I PPL-C Fraar~4 l 41varr- ' CoJDept. Co. Phana # Phone # Fax # ~ Fax # h- . , . ~ ~-~IV ED RECe INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC. MAR 2 019903' March 15, 1995 SPOKRNE GOUtiTY ENGlNEER W.O. 94221 Pat Harper Spokane County Planning Department 1026 West Broadway : Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Appendix to threshold study for Turtle Creek Dear Pat: F I understand that, as the approval process for this project has drawn to a close, issues relating to the intersection of Appleway & Sprague, have continued to arise. This intersection was only studied after the initial distribution of traffic was brought into question. I do not believe that the traff'ic from Turtle Creek will distribute itself in such a way as to have an adverse impact to this intersection. Therefore, after talks with you and Rich Dahm, I have written the attached appendix to the threshold study which will, to the best of my abiliry, address everyone's concerns. Sincerely, . Inland Pacific Engineering Co. n 6` , Ann L. Winkler, P. E. encl. cc: Rich Dahm Cathy Ramm 707 West 7th . Suite 200 Spokane, Washington 99204 509-458-6840 FAX: 509-458-6844 . i ' C ' r _ • . . . , i,~ . r . t ~Kx~, . l December 16, 1994 ,h . MEMORANDUM • i: TO: Pat Harper, Supervising Technician FROM: Scott Engelhard, Project Coordinator , Y . SUBJECT: Estunates for Road Improvements and Signal Participation FILE: P1753 ~ Here are the "rough" estimates you asked for: - Barker Road from 8th Avenue to Appleway -$192,500 Long Road from $th to 4th -$77,460 10 % Participation in Traff'ic Signal at Barker Road and I-90 Ramps - $12, 000 • •..,r•+.: . ~ ~ ~ • . , •l , • - - ~ 7 I ' ~ . 14 _ - _ - . !~G - ~ ~ - • 30 47W ' r~~ • . - ~ ~ . . o • ~ ~ ~ - ~ - . - t ~ - ` ~ _ , . J' ~~,j~~~ - • . ~ _ . - , y t - . . a - - ' ~ ~ . . - - - - - _ . . _ . . - - - ~ l . • _ i ~ • „ . ~ ~ ~~t ~ -'_.~__}__~L ' ' _ : t_ i . . ' ' " .J . 1 _ 'I . , _ . - . . _ . ~ . . _ . . ~ . . ~ . ' _ ' " ~ • • -:5o k) tc..o 1,40 ~,-n.e~-. ~ ~ 40 ~ - ~ ~ 14C ? S 30 . aU l c,~ I G -70 ~ s i- - --~7_ _ - . - - - 31 ~ - . . ~.~G~b ~ ► / ~ ~~~b ~ q4 00 ~ D -~es~ ~ ' _3 ~ ~ • ~a !/~cr~t Ge~ j 0 _ `~z`. : ~A~2,1C~~-- ~~c~ ; dv -?Z' r ~ ~ + LokX,.a P-OA-0 Qjo~ 1 ~ 'I A' ; 74 -t- . - . g,injp.L- 1~>Wasz et- ~JA ~ 4-oLA-~,'j ~ r+ . ~ . . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ' ' ~ • 1~--i~ f` ~ . ~ ~ . _ ~~.7~- ' ~ , ~ ~ ' ' ` -t EK(S'~ ~ ~ ~,g~~~ • • ~ ~~~-7' ~ ! ,t ~ / - - - 614 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - i _ - - - - - ~F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s . `To . . , ~ . . ~ SOo _~~o ~D 6,0 ~ 77, 2 7 . ~ - ' - - . • . . ~ _ ~ ..f~ . • 1._ E • ~ ~ ~ ~ L _ ~ _ ~ • • _ . _ " ' ' .>r . ~ ~ . . . _ ,1~ o-~I I' • : • " _ ' . J t ~ ♦~--y ~Y~rI . . • ~ ~ f - j' • r _ . - t ~ ' ~ . - - - - - - - - . _ - - ? - - - - . . ~ . i • • - . _ - - - - - ' ~ . ~ . ~ . . . . • ~ ~ . . ~ , • a tiw , r ? ~ 4 ~ P C~p k,- 'AL- I-,I ~ . 4 Y7 I _ N ~ C) Ti lq -r -V I~ OFFICE OF THE CQUhiTY ENGMER ~ A DNLSEQN DF THE PusC..TC VYoRK5 DEPARTmENI' Ranald C. Haxmann, P.E,, County 'Engzneer I]ennis M. Scott, P.E., D'zrector ~ MEMO . ~ _ - ^ ~ • -r~ • ~ . ~ s7 i TO: Boaird of County Co, ~aaissioners e~, FROiV1: Pat Harger, County Engi.neermig : J, DA'TE; December 16, 1994 . ~ - AA~ ~UBJECT: T°uxtle Creek Road buapravement Costs =l ~ A MILE: PE 1753-94 T'l1I`t~~ Creek , ~ Barker Road from Sth A.venue to Appleway - $ 192,500 . Long Road from Sth Avenue to 4th Avenue - $ 77,460 { 10% participation xn tt'aff[c signal at y Barker Raad and A,ppleway - $ 12,000 h Slgnal at I-90 raxripS ' $120,000 The above referenced numbears are on1y a roug-h estimate si.nce raad plans are nat done for the prajects. T'hese uumbe,x are based on County ~~gineering completion af these projects. . ~ t:~.•!,'.~y 'rM Pl..i~ r~;fy'{SI'~} • i~ e 1 f~~~ xR 4 ~y. M ` ~Y 1026 W. Broadway Ave. •Spoka.ne, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (5{}9) 324-347$ TL)D: (509) 324-3166 ~ • ~ VW5 , - ` ~ . ~ - NNLAND PACIFic ENGINEERING, INC. February 7, 1995 W. O. 94221 Spoka.ne Cvunty Plannxng Department , 1026 West Brgadway . . Spokane, WA. 99201 Attn. Pat Harper - } RE: Expanded threshold traffic study far TvrCe Creek : Dear Pat: Dur-ing the County Cvrrrmissio~ers hearing an the Turtle Creek, praject on December f, 1994, - the validzty of the tra~fic stxdy due to the traffic distribution was brought into question. The original threshold traffic study was done with the gaal of analyzing #.he irnpacts of the traffi-c generated by Turtle Creek t.o the Barker arterial. The scope of the ariginal threshold study was received by us~~om county personnel, and as always, included the Xocations most likely to s+ee impac#s frorn this develvpment, In this case the impacts were anticipatei tn be felt on the Barker a.rterial. 5'COPE OF ORI~EVAL TH~.RE,SH~~ SYTJD,Y rn order to clearly dernonstrate what, if any, irnpacts wauld be felt on the Barker arterial, the threshold study directed mast (95%) of the traffic to Barker. This was dane to show► the woxst possible impacts which cautd be felt due to the additiQn af this develo,pment. This goal was achieved since very few new concerns were brought fvY-way'd regarding the Barker arterial- eonidor. SCOPE OF THIS AMEADMENT The cpncerns raised a# t.he hearing were ~-n rega.rd to the #raffic on Long Road, at the intersectian of Sprague & App1~~ay, and an Barker south of AppXeway. Therefore, this amendment center~ around an analysis of the level of service at the intersections of Sprague & Appleway, Sprague & Long and Sprague & Barker. This letter also addresses issues regarding the Greenacres Elementary Schoo1 and the other traffic concexns which were raised at the hean-ng. These coneems focused on 'Long Road and the Sprague & Applevvay intersection and vvere brought abou~ by consideratio-n for sehflal age pedestrians and traffic generated by the Greenacres Fle-menta.ry Schoal at the corner c~f Long & 4th. As a preface to r~y response to these concerns, we wvuld 1ike to restate the m1t1g8tiDII fflT TAIIg Road w111ch waS pI'eSeI7.ted iIl th~ threshold study. These items will 6e accomplished befare the completion af the first phase; i.e., basically up firont. 707 West Tth ■ Suite 200 Spvkane, Washirrgfon 99204 509'458-6840 FAX: 509-458-6844 • • I P1■RJPOS1JD lf1LlIlJlllIVN - Pave Lang Road, from ~th Avenue nonh ta the existing pavement • Provide a hard surface pedestr°ian -walkway on the east side ofIorag Road lqth the new paverrtent The fact that #raffic from Tu.rtle Creek wi1l use Lnng Road was never in questian as evidenced by the mitigation which was proposed and accepted. Hovvever, in order ta maximi~e the effectiveness frvm the rritigation, vcre distributed the majority of the trips to Barker, the nearest - artenal. After a11, we feit that the internal raads would be at Ievel of serv,ice (I.QS) A and what minimal irnpacts there wauld be alang Lang Road would, in essence require N0 mikagation and would minirn.ize potentially more -important impac#s on Barker, as the closest arterial, and a street . which carries nnucn mare iraf~ic. Because traffic frorn Turtle Creek will nse Lang Raad afld due ~ ta Spakane's air quaIity prob,lems, specifically PIVI-10, paving Laug Raad is impartant. AXso t children from this area will he dttending Greenacres Elementary School at the Intersection af La~g and 4th and need a separate walka.ng axea. Both Q-f these measures needs to be ineluded at the st.arit vf this developrnent. , - ChzXdren who presently walk from 8th Ave ta the Greenacres Elementary'have a wide area to vval.k o-n which is off the Foad but, within the Covnty right af way. However, as a part of the umtigataon for this project, prvviding a hard surface pedestrian walkway on the east side of Lrong Roa+d was seen as necessary to provide protection far these school age pedestrians. LEVEI. QF SERVICE .A NALYSIS Most of the concerns, hwweverT center on in4Vrstxtions ro~ ~f th-e e~ementary sehool.. Therefore, the ariginal traffic cvunts vfvere supplemented by caunt,s fiaken at the Sprague & AppYeway intersection, at Sprague & Long and at Sprague & Barker. The traff c coun#s taken- at these three intersection-s were taken on schaol days in earxy January, 1995. The weather was cold, but there fiad been na sno-vv for some tirne. The volumes counted in ranuary match very vv~~l with the volumes counted in Tu1y, 1994 at Barker & Appleway. This shaws that the traff'i~ volumes in tYiis area stay much the same over the course of ayear and verify what vve stated at the hearing. Sprague & Apple-way - Existing Since -more inforrnation gs available on.L.ong and on Sprague east of Appleway at this gaint, atz analysis af th.is part af the transportatian system c~ati naw be made. We will start with the intersection af Sptague & Appleway. At the present tirne, this intersection is functivning a# a leVel of SeFN1C~ (L~~) D in the A~ ~eak hollr (w1t1 114 p35SeI1~er CarS ~~r houx (pCpb) Te5eY`Ve capacity) and at LOS ElF in the PM peak hour (with 4 pcph reserve capacxty). IJevel of service E is the 1Qwest acceptable level of service for an unsignalized intexsection. Therefore, as the ,residents of this axea already know; in the evening, the northbound to westbvund 1eft turiiing maneuver is difficu,lt far the 98 vehic1es which we sawF making that maneuver. This northbound left turning maneuvex is the predominant tuming rnane-uver a# this intersectioa as shovvn an the. ~ 4 _ ~ ~a-r~er Februar~r 7, ~9~5 Pa~~ 3 fig~-~s whi~h ar~ attacf~ec~. Ad,d~n~ ~v~ry ~ew ~ao.re ~a~r~ ~a t~is r~aneuver ~o~~d ~aus~ ~is inters~ctior~ ~o fa~t t.~ L~~]~ F w~tu~~ ~s unaccep~ab~e 1~~ C~ur~~ standards. It is our opinia~ ~a~ ~is ir~~ersec~ior~, wifi.~ ~a~y 4 pcg1~ ~~seFV~ capacity is at L(JS F. ~'h~re~~vre, t~i~ in~er~~ct~v~~ s~~uld ~e ~onsidered an exis~~~g op~~a~YOna1 p~-o~1em. ' r S'~ra~~e ~ App~e~cxy - A~t~c~pated ~~95 ~i~hour ~'ur~~e Cre~l~ ~ three ~eaxs, vc~it~o~t '~r~t~~ ~~ee1~ but vvit.~ the a~ticipated 6~ p~r y~ar ~a~~~~nded ~r~wth t~~ ~+~un~y is ex~ec~~, ttiis in~e~rsec~.o~, ~~~i~g th~ PM g~ak hour v►~i1~ be wel€ inta ~,~5 F v~rit~ - a~~r~d~~ted ~ese~ve ca~a~ity c~f ~ pcp~r. ~`k~e ~eve1 ~f ser~~c~ durin~ ~ie AiVi p~a.l~ ~o~ v~ri1~ also t~av~ dr~pped fr~~ D t~ E wit.~ a predicte~i ~~eserve capac~t~y ~f 3f~ p~p~. ~ince t~is c~ro~ b~~ov~ ~ le~rel s~a~vice ~ w~11 be dor~e ~~t~o~~ a~~r tra~ffi~ fr~m ~u~~ ~r~ek, this si~uatior~ wx11 n~ b~ due t~o tr~i~'~c fr~m TurtYe ~r~~k, nor is ~u~le ~reek r~span.~xbl~ for rec~ify~~g ~h~s situa~io~. ,~'p►rag~~ c~ ~,a~~ - ~x~stir~~ T'h~ se~~nd ~r~ters~cti.on far ~~aich additx4nal anal~~~~ ha~ been do~e is ~~parag~~ 8~ ~r~g. '~'h~s inter~ec~ion u~il~ have mar~ traffic thar~ any a~ the in~e~sec~~ns Lvn~ s~~t~ of Sp~agu~ a~d- ~v,~.~ th~re~~~e ~~~eri~n~e t~e Io~e~t leve~ o~ se~-v~ic~ of ~ny ir~tearsec~i~n nn L~ng ~,~ad ~e~we.~~- $th and Sp,ragu~e. ~r~sentl~ t~iis inters~~tio~ exp~rien~~s L~S A wi~ 6~~ p~ph in t~he r~~i p~a~ ho~ ax~d f 3~ pcph ~l~ring ~h~ PM pe~ ha~r. Le~ver o~ serv~~e A is ~e hi~~~st ~ev~l af ~~~v~~e~ anc~ indicates ~n ~~~te~sec~ion whi~~a ~u~~tioning ~ery w~~~. ~"he othex ,~nter~ecfi~o~s on wi~ there~~re a11 ex~erience L~S ~ wi~h high~~r r.~serve capa~~t~ th~ ~.his. Spr~agr~~ c~ L~n~ - An~~zp~ted ~~~5 wit~~ut ~'ur~~e Cr~ek This int~r~ec~ia~, e~ren vvith the ar~tici~at~d traf~c ~r~w~ af pe~ ~~~r fo~ ~he ne~~ ~hr~e ~rears vsril~ r~~na~n at ~~vel ~f ~ervice A. LJsi~~ the Hig~w~~ ~apacity 11+~~nua~'~ a~ethod b~~r~ as e~~ev~rh~re ~n, t~i~s ~~a~~sis~ XI7~ X~1T~~ Cl~ ~~,~'V1~~ 1~ ~ V411~1 3 T~~~I'V~ C~~]~C1~T ~~~3~ [~l~rl~. ~he ~M peak l~aur an~ ~88 pcph in ~he P1VI g~~k h~~. ~vurt~ ~ ~,or~g ~ ~'owr~h ~ L~n~ ~i11 e~~erien~e sorn~ ~~r~~e~~a,n ~~uring ~.he beginning a~d ~ndi~n~ vf t,~e s~~v~~ ~a.~ du~ t~ ~a~~nt pic~ ~p ~nd ~iro~ o~ a~ v~~1i as ern~loyee arri~a~ a~d c~~~artur~ a~~ the presence ~f s~hool ~u~~s. C~~ar~ts af pick ups and ~.~-~p a~s w~~~ don~ at this s~hoa~. ~'hese c~urats w~~~ do~e an a~riday v~rhen ~s rr~an~u~~~ vvas e~pect~c~ ta th~ t~~h~s~. ~or~i~g ~r~~ ~~f~ wer~ measta.re~i~ a~ i~2 and af~er schoal pxc~ ups ~~rr~bere~ 8~ . Th~~ ainoun~ ~f tra~fic, combi~~d ~vith emp~~y~~s ax,~d bu~es will k~ep th~ 1e~rels o~ ~erv~ic~ a~v~~ Long tc~ an LQS of ,A. ~prag~~ c~ ,~~rker ~ Fxis~ar~g At ~~~ague Bark~r, leve~s c~f ~~rv~ce u~ere ~o~ s~eci~c~lly ca~culat~d, ~havvever, in~er~ecti~ns wi~h f~~-~vay sto~ ~an~r~~ a~re able t~ ~a~d~e m~r~ tharY 9~~ ~~hicl~s per hou~r ~n~ r~a~nt,~in ~ Te~~l s~rvic~ ~f C car a~o~e. At th~ p~~sent tirr~e, the pea~ houx da~, w~ich f~lls d~n~ th~ a~~rr~a~n, has ~~9 vehicle~ in i~. - , ~ f ,s, _ , `-j r ~ . . ~1=~~si? ~S .~C(u , a t•i J~ ~ P. Harper February 7, 1995 Page 4 Sprague & Barker - Anticipated 1998 LOS without Turtle Creek With the growth anticipated in the next three years, this intersection is anticipated to see 511 vehicles duri.ng the peak hour, much less than the 900 vehicles which this stop controlled intersection can easily handle. Therefore this four way stop will also funcdon very well into the foreseeable future at an approximate level of service of B. AIVALYSIS OF TRAFFIC SYSTEM tiVITH TURTLE CREEg Turtle Creek is a residential development of 101 homes which is anticipated to generate traff c typical of residential developments all over the United States. Hundreds of studies have been done on traffic generated by residential developments and are compiles in a book published by „ the Institute of Transportation Engineers called The TriD Generation ManuaZ. This book was used to anticipate the traffic generated by the Turtle Creek development. TURTLE CREEK TRIP DISTRIBUTION ALTERNAT'IYES The questions raised at the hearing do not so much challenge the amount of traffic which will be generated by this development, but rather the routes which will be chosen by these vehicles to access their work sites and return home. As stated before, the original threshold study was analyzed to show what if any impacts would be felt along Barker. Barker is, after all, the closest arterial, and most traf,fic chooses to use the arterial system as it has been provided for them. Trips off of the arterial system are usually due to origins or destination off of the arterial system, in this case, t.he school at 4th 8c Long. However, as questions about the braff'ic on Long Road arose, and more data was gathered, a range of possible distribution scenarios has become clear. It is our professional opinion ttiat no more than 95 % of the traffic from Turtle Cxeek will choose to use the Barker arterial. At the other end of the range, it is also clear from existing traffic patterns that no more than 35 % of the traffic will use Long Road during the AM peak hour and when leaving the site during the PM peak hour. Existing traffic patterns sbow that about 50% of the traffic retuming to this area in the PN.i peak hour comes from the Barker arterial, and the remaining 50 % comes from the Sprague 8i Appleway intersection and, if the destination were Turtle Creek, would use Long Road to access their homes. Since this addendum is to address Long Road, the most traffic'which could reasonably be expected to use Long, 35 was used as the other end of the possible distribution range and was used for the addendum analysis of Long. This distribution is as follows: during the AM peak hour, 35 % of the traffic use Long to go to or from their homes; during the PM peak hour, 35 % use Long to leave their homes, and 50% use Long to return to their homes. Under this alternate distribution, traffic will be added to the intersections of Appleway & Sprague and Sprague & Long. With this added traffic the levels of service are anticipated to be . as follows. At the intersection of Sprague & Appleway during the AM peak hour, LOS E with a reserve capacity of 6 pcph. Compared to the situation of increased 6% per year traffic growth, the level of service stays the same, but the traffic from Turtle Creek will used 24 pcph reserve . • , I P. Harper February 7, 1995 Page S capacity. During the PM peak hour the anticipated level of service will be F with -68 pcph of reserve capacity. As stated earlier, the PM peak hour .level of service is anticipated to be F without the additional traffic from Turt1e Creek; however, the additional traffic from Turtle Creek uses up 17 pcph of additional reserve capacity. At Sprague & Long, the level of service will continue with an LOS of A even with the additional traffic from Turtle Creek, with anticipated reserve capacities of 595 pcph during the .AM peak hour and 549 pcph in the PM peak hour. Since Sprague & Long will continue to have more traffic than the intersections of Long south of Sprague, all of the other intersections, including 4th & Long will also continue at an LOS of A. MORIVINGSIDE HEIGHTS One of the concerns which was voiced at the public hearing on December 6, 1994 was additional iraffic and other impacts which would be generated by other developments being proposed by Mr. Dahm in this area. Morningside Heights is a proposed development on the hill to the south of Turtle Creek adjacent to and east of Momingside. Morningside Heights began it's review process in December, 1994, five months after Turtle Creek, which began it's review process in June, 1994. According to the SEPA laws of the State of Washington, environmental impacts, including traffic, which must be looked at as a part of approving Morningside Heights will have to include the impacts of all previously approved land uses including Turtle Creek. HovYever, projects which start through the review process first, such as Turtle Creek, do not, nor can they, take into account projects which enter the review process after ttiem such as Morningside Heights. We, therefore, strenuouslv disagree with being asked to take into account traffic from a project which entered the review process well after Turtle Creek aad at this point in time has not been through even SEPA scoping. Our primary objection stems from the precedent this may set. Therefore we are providing this information on a proposed project or action which may never materialize. Morningside Heights as presently configured has 265 single family residences in it. In the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) completed and accepted some time ago for Momingside, an extra 500 single family homes were included. Morningside Heights comprises some of these 500 homes. The Moraingside TIA showed that all of the traffic from the greater Momingside area could be adequately handled by the Sullivan arterial without the new road connecting the Momingside area to Barker via an alignment which will tie in somewhere north of 24th and south of Turtle Creek. Since the Morningside Heights project can be built without this additional road, one possible situation which arises is that vi.rtually all of the traffic from Morningside Heights will use the Sullivan arterial. However, if this connection to Barker is made-, it is . andcipated that no more than 40 % of the traffic from Morningside Heights would use this route. - ' . ' r . ._?x`J:• . . I ~ • s - P. Harper February 7, 1995 Page 6 Trip Generation Rates However, to expedite the approval process for Turtle Creek, we have analyzed the traffic anticipated from the Morningside Heights project and will be evaluating this potential land action in a cursory way. In order that no questions should be raised regarding the amount of traffic - from Morningside Heights which will use Barker, it will be assumecl that about 40 %(or 106 dwelling units) of the traffic from this development will use Barker. This is on the high end of ' the range of possible distributions for traffic from this development. The anticipated trip generation rates will be as shown on the following table. Table 1- Trip Generation Rates for 106 dwelli.ng units (40% of Morningside Heights) . - . . . , . r.. . : - : ~ . ~xfi::•;::.: . . .::h•: . : ~ . . . • ...........z~ . . • . . • ......:t : . ......,.k...........:..~r.... : ~ . . . - . . . - r • ,~•:r::.:•::.~.::.;....... " " ....~.....n. .......ti . . . . • ..~.r}k. . . . . . . . . . { . . . . . : . . . . ~ v: ~ ~ :::::.:::'•T. - ~ ~ F{•: ~ ~ : ~ j~ •.L.1,.~ ~ '"'r: . • v:. " . ~ ::::v . ~ • • ~ . • • ~ . . . _ • Y::: . •:.V..::.:... . . . . ••...~.i•f • . :'ii i ' ' . . . . - . . .P . ot, . . ................................r.r....~~.AM ~ . . ~M~:Pea~~: . . . . . . . , . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . ......,......~.,.s~,.~ . . . - . . . _ _ , : . : ~ ~ ~ . . ' . ..:....ti . ' ' " . i4~$yS:.:.::' . N.......... ' v ~ . : ~'r.i: }}}i?}}7}:4?:'• • . . n•. . . . 4}•: .ti.....:.. ' " . ' ' . . . • • . .....r.. .r . r... . . . . :w•.~ . • : ~1~T:::.t:v.~.~n • . . h..{ ....y; ' . :v.. vJ:.:........~ ti1.. . '~'1:•:':':•'~:"~~~:tiw.'ff.w~.•.~~ • . ~....L..."'.. • ♦ ' : v:::: v:{{. : v vh. L}.. ..}.r':':'::.;:::::{:, vk:v •.......n..~.. ;..~:.ti. • v: . ~ . : v • v. •.v :.vr.. {:f:?;?r:; - ....~Q :•:~t'.~C~IOiI~::~~:::~~:~:'::~::~:~::::~: . . . ~Aucect~oaal.x::; ~ .r... . . ~ ~ - . . . : ~.r..::::::.~:.~ . . . . . : . ~ . . . ..r.. . r.:;:::, . . . . . . . . ..ti.....~ . ' '..:::.:.~...::ii:~•:i.~:::: •:::J::.. . ,~~j.•.:'~'1{Y '~.r• •.~~~..r.r.y...... ♦ { ":"*~ii~•i}.ti~'-'i-'-i•'.-.• ......•r'~•::.:.:: ~ ..r.. . . y~•~:. . . . r ~}:::•'r7}'•7'•:'•>: . i. : r~~:.~:::.: . . {?:?:'r.~:: :w: vv: Yk}:... , :~s~fi~buhon:~:•» .:::...frips per.:' :.;:D~,st~itiut~~~~..: . . . . . . dr~ps..pe,~.~9..:::., : . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . .........:::i~:>::>:. :v.:.~ : r"'.: Cj - ,w.i: Y ~r : • . ' " . • ~ T:~:'•?:i D~ . il •.:::.~':.~•:\Y:\:•>:•~•7.•...;: ...........•...•~.•~•.y.. •i:~:i: . ' ' n..... . " • i •i:•i??:: ~ti•~tiv: . . . : ~ {t:.:: n;.; . . ~-.::::::.~.:~•1: • : ::v:: • . ?..::i}: ~ _ u: - . ...t • ' ~ :v:. ~ :w:.w:. ~ , . - . • ....i;i.;:•; . n.. , . . • •i: ~ ;:.i:•: . : ' : v:::: ::::v~:::~~ . . . ' . . 6. r....;..:;Q~.. 106 81 21 60 108 70 38 . . ~ . . . . . : . . . - . . . _ . ..,~,hti . . . . . . . ~ ~ . , . . . . • . k.~ . • • : : : ' . ' . A..•:::.':.•~ l.ti ~ :~.ti'.:`}:•.ti...:: i . ~ ' Y ti'.•.`~:::. , . . . . . . • . . . : • i • : . - . v{;:: • - • ~ _~Aa . f. ~ . , ~ , ~ ~ : . , ....1~, . . _ . .........ta.. . . . ,•i~::<~~i:~i~?`:i:~>'~:'>'~'' : . ::..;...t•ti•r:::::.::~.. : ~ ::.,~n......... :cx. • - • • . . • • . . . . . . . , ~ . , •o-::•::...; . ~ - :~:v+~{: . . . : • r. .h... . . . ~c~•::;•.:~:.~:, . . ~ ..ti....ti. 1..... t.,..tL.. . . . ~ : : • : . . . . . < . . n r...... . . ~ ~ . ~:'=:2C~: :?<~:t8'} . . . r.n. r . ~ : ti t..........:.. , } . . • . . . • • . ::r~:''+ '+ica.t:.~ .............,;w.L.... - . . - .h,.......•tti,~>::::.:. ~ . ti.. . ~t.~C } . . . . . . . - . ~ . ..:..........'::::•:•:ti•:•:ti~$ti'h3' ~ L.. .ti..h.r.. . ' ...n.n.. ........tit.~.... r}.v}}ii::~.. . . ~ •.~.v::v.::.' - .T . . . :::r. . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . ~ : . ti :.vr ' ~ . . . :v.:....~:titi : Y•S:•}::~ ii:i. : • " :v~~:.. . . ....Y.;...,- ' ..n..w.~ ....t ti......- ':~:::'{~~:~}i:ir$.~'~S. ~ . . . . - . . . n . . . ; v. ~ . : • 'T ~al•:AU'~•. . • ..~'r.....•....... r.ots . . . .......~..r..~tat.e - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ...4.. . .....r.. . ~ ,ti~.r: .r : :.,.,.c . . - . . . - .....x..~...... ?:ti~::>;;:;:::;;:::::~ . ~ 'r:; ; i:ctE?k•::. :;;~.:~.ti..... `~:~<'?~:=~>:•:~:~:r>'•: • 1 1012 06 9.55 , . . . . . . Trip Distribution It is assumed that the traffic from this development will distribute itself within the Barker corridor in the same way that existing traffic does and that the mitigation required for 'Iurt1e Creek and Riverway Villa are in place. Mitigation for Turtle Creek includes a signal at the intersection of Barker & the westbound I-90 ramps. Riverway Villa, as part of that project's mitigation, will be installing a signal at the intersection of Barker & the eastbound I-90 ramps. Level of service calculations at pertinent intersections Below are two tables wluch show what the levels of service will be at build out of Turtle Creek & the first phase of Riverway Villa in comparison with what the levels of service will be with the additional traffic from Morningside Heights. ~ / - P. Harper February 7, 1995 Page 7 • Table 2- AM peak hour level of service comparison . . II~~ ~.4~J:~:~:~ 9►M::!' ~ F~ . - ::H~~ ~JR~~~I~A~~~~~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~ Q . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~...NT..R....~.....3N f ~ . . ~~~T~ ~W f~.:.:.: : . . ~ . D ~ .~RN~~~ ~:.1V.~El~t~7Y~~S~ . ::l~If? ~ IDL . . . . . . . ~ . . . - - . . . . .X..... ~ 5~:. ~ Westbound I-90 Ramps & Barker Road 5.4 sec B 6.2 sec B Eastbound I-90 Ramps & Barker Road 4.8 sec A 4.9 sec A Appleway & Barker Road 8.9 sec B 9.4 sec B Table 3- PM peak hour level of service comparison ~ .~T~~~ ....AR~~~.~98~~ 'F ~U~D~:O~): . . ,.E.. ::~i:~ s~~~za ~:I~T ~ . .:a~. . ~ .~~s~~~::::::~. : a~~ ~ ~ . . ..T~. ~ . ~~~I ~ ~ E~G I~T . . . .~~OS~ EI .~L Westbound 1-90 Ramps & Barker Road 5.6 sec B 6.2 sec B Eastbound I-90 Ramps & Barker Road 9.9 sec B 12.6 sec B Appleway & Barker Road 11.0 sec B 11.1 sec B Note that at each intersection mentioned, the level of service is very acceptable. Therefore, the additional traffic generated by Morningside Heights will easily be accommodated by the transportation system as it will be after Turtle Creek and Riverway Villa have finished their mitigating measures to the transportation system. The other intersections included in this letter will remain at their existing levels of service, even with the addition of the traffic from Morn.ingside Heights. The intersections along Long Avenue, are well into LOS A, the intersection of Sprague & Barker will remain at LOS C or better, and the intersection of Sprague & Appleway is an existing operational problem. . •~1~. . v - ~ . • • S / P. HaTper February 7, 1995 Page S - - !{7/~'~F/7Fy~~F . Y: RlA/~+* 4^~V ~~~i/17S r The intersection of Sparague & Appleway is. the so1e exception to the otherwise excellent trarrspor#,ation system ava.ilable in thzs area. Ho'wever, rectifying the sita.ation at this intersection should be pa.rt of the Caunty's normal plan for improving the transpartatian system and the cost of any improvernents necessa.ry should be born by all of the resident,s of Spokane County ratiher than by any specific develapment ar individual. From the anarysis provxded, it is obvio~s that the impacts to,Long Road vvill be minimal an[~ that . intersectian levels of servxce will remain very good an I.cang Raad (LOS A). Traff cgeperated by Morningside Heights can easily be accommadated by the transportation system as impraved by T-artle Cre~k and Riverway Vixlas. Turtle Creek rnitigation incxude installing a signal,a# Barkeir & the vvestbflund,1-90 rarnps, providing new h~~ surface pedestrian walkways on Long Raad along vvith the new pavennent between 6th Avenue and $th Avenue arrd wideaing BarkeF between Stfi Avenue and Sprague Avenue. Also note th.at Turtle Creek is adding subZantia.Uytv the capacity and abilxty of the surround.ing transportation systern to handle the existing vehiCles vn the system at present and the extra traffic generated by Tvrde Creek, as wel.l as traffic voiumes well in excess of th.e extra traffic generated by Turtle Creek. If you bave any que'st'rons on tins, or need somet.hing more, please let me know. Sxncerely, , Inrand Facific Engineering Co. - ~ `I'odd R. Whipple, P.E. TRWf alw encI, ; CC: ;Leonard Cash Rich Y]atrn Cathy Ramm . rf . .fr ' t= • - : ' . ' . a.~ ' ' J ' rj ! . . o • ~ .o-ll, ° . .n. . 4 . . , ~ ( ~vgtr~ • `'-i ~ JI' l~ ~ ~r- • l~o o a p ' . . - • • `'o ~ - ' ' . . •P~k_ • ' ± ~ ° a • - . . . _ . :';~,o o, ~c • ' ' (1~ o ~ • Zazp ' : , • ` ~ ~ ` % l o , . , ~ o• ~ • Trailei Park °;ursS+oN r~~ ~ , _ , - , . . . . . . . _ ti' . BM 2037 sivE ~ - ~ _-ry...~__ ~ j'. 2CjJ~= ~ , ~ .'yG ° o no ~ ~ ~ 0 1 0• • :I.... . . ,I~ ~ ~r...WT O ~ ~ ± ~ P • , _ weus . , " o : NER ~ ~ - _ y. . . R-f ~j?=,'~ ~y"~'~ I~,n,i`~S ~ . ~ •a~: . . f ' N • • ~ ~ ~ .1:: . : : ' • _ ~ N : . - -._Green acres ; Li ,~GXD ~ jos~ 7 ~ • - „ . - - . , . ~ g.~j ; E~ ; . ; ° : o_•--__`_-~„~.~. ~o's~ . . _ ; ~ 11: . - _ . • , , . ~ ~ ' \~E ' ' ~ ° . ° ° . I • 1 ~ ~ ~ , •r~ •70~0-.... . ' . • t (.ANE 218 ~ • !~s l . 7016 13 . ~ . . • ~r? ` _ ' _ 4 LPNE NED:- ~ ...o . . o - • o ' • ' c o • o . `O O • • . Q . o/ `o o :pBpN , . ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . > ~ . ' o o° o. , ~ • a e ~ . . 1 • ~ , t: do12 , e . , a ' . ; : • ~ : o . ' Trailer . c.,'."t-^'-; '.o,. J o , o,~ ~~....I~ Q~ Park ' , ~24. ~ . . . . • . . . _ . - . / . : . o . ~ Q • _.a,s , , ~ . . . . . . . o _I . o W/~Y o• - . ' . . . - o ~ i a ' ~ 1 - • , t . ~ . J.-H,~, I , . . r-~:• ~ ' ' . . • ' • '$ch'■. 203~~ . - ,=;r=,r~-. _ . . . ' • • = ..T' ? , «~E ~ Q o . : •:o \ :o o• WT 03 ^L'~~0'~~ •p. . . . . ~ . . • ~ :1. • ,r~-.^~. .o I..... '.4 ' • . . . I . . , . .1 _ , ~ l . . . _ . . . ,.,ri v~ . . ~ •r- - - - - . . . .--_-.~s ~ . - • j.' ~s l I, o'~ , o-% • • ~ r . ~ ~ • ~ •~'o~''o o•o$PRAG~IE . _ . . I . I j • . _ - . _ . ~ o o' oa~ o J • o J ~ o. . ~ • • • • • o o J . :k_ ff , -v - ` - i • . ~ • • . . . ' i Grave1 ~P.jt:c ' ~i. , , ,i; • • i . . . . . • , ~ r ~ ~ 'Tra~ier `o ' ~r :i•; •Q£.~~ • ° . . - . : . . . 4TN • . • AV£'' -_.t -.e o , . . . o . , . . • ~ ol Park . . o . . _ _ . . o i . : . , . • o ...1••v{ . , • J~ ' . r . ~ o a o ~o~ ~ ~o~ o I l' •^,."7 .Z, ' ~ o • : o i o ~ ~ • - ~ ll~ • : L . 0 ' - ..he r ,c,. o' 2_._ • ' . ' 2°6 • - - ! . . ~ak,e~~~ . - _ o . . . i _ _ . ~ • ~ "~~yy L ~ . : n°' • ~ . ~ : • i a TU RT~ ' ~ ~II ~ . . .LYJI~. . . , • . ~ ~ ~ • . _ , j n ' ~i ~ r. _ . j ` ~ . „ ~ ~ Central V alley sposal i' I ~ t tiigh•Sch tL\ u _ ~Sew~ e0i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.i- ' ~ \ 1! Qs- • ~ ~ - . . . . . . . . "~'I . ~O ti~ ' !J _ ; •I, j~~J ,j•1~.~~ 4 ` ~ ~ ' ~ 'i.•,,I', • • X 2 ~•l: ^ Vb •~t~ ~ . -'t - _ _ ~ ~i • ~ !i. l. ~ b ~ ~ c" ~ 11' - - - - - 4" _L • . : ~1caoe6 - ; 1;+\~. ; , ' a • ~ M r. ---.,_c.~_ ~ t • ~y' • ' d ' 1''' , . tl~ 1 a p! • - . ~ ' . ' ~ , ~ . . . . • E~ . f , - . _~~s ~'G.av etit ~ . l,/ : . , , j / Z ' ~ 2083 ~1. W,~• f 1~~ ~i: •,v~~`• 't: Q~ / ~ i. . . . , . . . . . I . ~ . . ~ % ~k - - - - - - - - - ri-''-.-,1. 1 ~~~,n • . ' - ' ' • Q~~ ; ~ ~ ~ =`^"T• % ` • ,v j~ xi,'~ , , . / ~ ~ i ` ~ •'i' . . ~ = ~ , /~/i: .~S ~ - " ~ ` ~ . r • / ~ , _ - , ` ; • - MORNi GSIDE ~IGH~fS ~ on 2 • ' :i PRELI ,•.t ~ /1-==-~__===-=o _ - ~ I '-j i; • ' • ~ • ~ ' ' ' ' ; J /t ( ~ ~ • _ r . ~ . ~ Q , ` ~ F8 fo~~ ?Q'10 . : ' •.1~ _ • ' ' • •c-icY_=a_. ) / ' 29 l N •stVE'••'r:' 1!%/ ' ' ~ • . • , / ~ • I I ~ , -w` ~i • . 2 /~i ' ~ . . • : .l 1°0 • . V - ~,fl . ~ , , = ~ ' - ' ~ ~I~ORIW ~SIDE , u ~ • . . I ~ ~ . , _ . ~'j • - • : . . ~ 4 ~ / _ ' - ~ ~ ~:d - • a ~ ` ~ ~~'t ~ ~ . J ~ 1 ~I~ . Y • ~ , ~ . o. ..D • I i _r f/ u~. p ^~1 ` ~ ~ t ~ ~ rj n .ol~ a ~ ~ ~ n+•. _ ,c. ( = ~ : c _u. ~fi • ' - ppp~JJJ / i2~, x' • ; ~J,•• I ~ ' ~,a ~ , .CGrange', 6M 2 ' _ . ~ ~ ~ • M 2227 i, • ---~A'L'Y n `.Hall" L ~ Rpn _ a57 0, gi-t 2129 6'' - ' i3l n ~ - ~ - - ~ a • ~ \C . la / ' t ~i~ n ~ "aC=m~- ~ . • ~~l ' n`' . I I ~ , ~ ~1 ' c~•,. . - - ~ ' ~ ~ ' ` TURTLE CREEK - ~ NLAND PACIFic ~ . ENGINEERlNG VICINITY MAP ~ 707 west 7th • suite 200 (509) 458-6M ` TRAFFiC IMPACT ANALY'SIS SPokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844J '-00/ \ • qw ~ ~ ~ . ~ - S , LO , - ~ . k 203 ~ r~'.~ 13~J 41 ~ ~ 21 ~ ~ ci Cf.p U - SPRAGUE AVENUE SPRAGUE Al1ENUE 0 ~ 4 C9 Y ~ 13~ ~r14$ 3 a;5 C~-~- 375 59 8 4 24 44 71 40 C~7 S ~2 a ~ r r~y Ir `v W) y r m ar 8TH AVEl+IUE d M ~ 3 17 0 Q ¢ ~ , +.r U ~ r:) NOT TO SCALE , ~ INLAhID FIGURE 1 ~ ~ . • ~ T~RTLE CREEK PACIFiC ENQI[VEERiNG EXI5Tf NG 1JOLUhrtES , 707 w,5sc ~th • Suice 200 (509) 458-sM A. M. PEAK HOU R TRAFFI C I M PACT ANALYSi S . . ~ spokane. wn 99204 FAx; (509) 45s-saa-4/ . - a ~ / ao 138 ~ 1~k,= 7 301 ~ 4*- 324 21 19 ~ N O - ~ CY. Z m v PQptoP~! SPRAGUE AVENUE ` ~ SPRAGUE AVENUE 0 . 0: !2oo ci x 0-=><!:- Y 6 ~ ~6 521 538 132 ~ 82 1683 16 8 m o ~ N . 8TH AVENUE r . ~a N tA Nn . V ~ Y 0 ~ `k= 15 I G=- o o ~ ` N NOT TO SCALE i INLAND ~ FlGURE 2 TURTLE CREEK; • ~ PACIFIC , ENGINEERING EXISTING VOLUMES N TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ~ 707 wesc 7th • suite 200 (509) asa-seao P. M. P EAK H 0 U R - \ Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844/ ` / \ ' • J ~ ~ • - , a ~ u, w 62 4 242 168 13 25 ~ rn u~ n ~ b • 1 4 ~ z SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ SPRAG[!IE AVENLIE ~ - - ~ ~ a ~r Q as4k,1~s 375 447 70 Ce- 76 29 ~ C:- ~7 85 cz~l 48~ a 1+~ ~10 ~ ~ <0 ~ 'e '41 , ci~n erH AvMuE ~ ~ ~ - Lf' k~ 4 20 o ~ ~o 5 N ~ N NOT T4 SCALE INLAND FIGURE 3 TURTLE CREEK PACIFIC BIJILDOUT YEAR WIO - ENGINEERrlVG PROJECT VOLUNfES TRAFFIC IMPACT AWLYS1S 4 ~'t 707 weet 7t, • suite 200 (509) 458-e840 . , ~ ~ s~~~ane, WA 99204 FAx: (5N) 4ss-s1"►►~ ~ . M. PEAK HOU R ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~no • 164-~ ~7 8 ' 358-=C> ~ 386 25 23 t p N h tA ~ N cr- Z o U SPRAGUE AVENUE ` ~ SPRArGUE AVENUE 0 (r ~oo cr- • ~ ~o~ Z 7 JP '~kn 7 -03 ~ 17czP ~51 621 641 157 98 gg C=> 32 200~ ~4 19 ~ ~10 38cz~7 ~11 aQ~ (~V d ~ h t0 STH AVENUE N ~ N Q 18 1 0 0 ~ 0 ~rf ~ n ~ NOT TO SCALE INLAND FlGURE 4 TURTLE CREEK ~ PACIFIC BUILDOUT YEAR W/0 - ~ • ENGINEERING PROJECT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMpACT A►vALYSIs „ so7 w~t 7th suita 200 (sos) 458-6e40 P.M. P EAK H 0 U R \ pakane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844/ \ J \ . . ~ ~ , o o 62 4 ; 242 ~ 166 15 28 a4~ Cp N Op IA N N ~ cr- Z P °v A~p~ Y SPRAGUE AVENUE SPRAGUE AVENUE a ~ c0 - N d ~ N Of rI O 8 ~ ~7 J ~ 15~ ~129 375-> 447 70 76 29 ~ 57 92 55 cz~\ 6 e10 14 a4~ ~...v n N N~°n 8TH AYENUE i t2n~ 41 20 Q ~ ~0 5 ~ ~6 ` N a N NOT TO SCALE INLAND FlGURE 5 TURTLE CREEK , PACIFIC BUILDOUT YEAR ENGINEERING WITH PROJECT VOLUMES " TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ; 707 w«t 7ch • suite 200 (sos) a.sa-saao A. M. P EAK H 0 U R ' \ Spokane. WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844~ . . . . ,.l'. a . . ~ ~mo 164~ ~g 358 386 29 27 ' n ~ ~ ~ Z 8 AQP~WPY SPRAGUE AVENUE SPRAGUE AVENUE 0 ~ 1200 N:2 00 co, (9 ' Y 7 ~ ~7 ~ ~ 17~ 51 621 ~ 641 157 -=r.> ~ 98 68 32 233 c:~\71~ ~ 4 52 czN, 10 38 ~ V 11 sni nvENUE 37 18 1 ~ ~0 O NOT TO SCALE , INLAND FlGURE 6 1~ 1 TURTLE CREEK PACIFIC 6UILDOUT YFAR ENGINEERING WITH PROJECT VOLUMES " TRAFFIC IMPACT "ANALYSIS .-.-04 as Spok ne~. WA 99204 2~ F,q)(9}(Spg) 45g-6g.4.4i P.M. PEAK H 0 U R IRW ~ ~ _ r ~ r- cw r ~oap ;~-21 0 7 27 VYESTBOUND CATAL.UO I -9Q RAMPS , - ~ ~ - ' u~ ~ 9,5 ~ 30 ~ . - ~ ~ ~ E1STSQUN#} I-$0 RAM pS aa .r ~ ~ 6~~• 4 ~ 242 166 19 35 ev a~ Qo , r4 ta - ~ ~ k, NoT TO sCAI.E~ fJ ~ r-~ ~ t yr ~ • ' , ' ~ NL INLAND ~ FiGuRE rURr'LE cREEK-~:. PACIFIC 1398 TRAFF1C, I#VCLUDING ~y ENG+11~Gk~~*EFIING Tl} IIp~R ITLE CREEI~R ANLJ . ~c,. •~Y-s':.`y et f~OF~~fIhJGSIDE HEIGHTS ro~ w~t ~tn ~ s~;te 200 ~sos~ as~-ss,w ~RA~'~'~ C I~IPA~~ AI~Af=Y~ES ~ s~~~~~~, w~ ~~w~ FAx: (509) 458-~~ ~ A. M. P EAK H OUR , • ~.a4-` a, e.;..?~~.~ = ~v+: ti;3 w 50 J' Q 27 ' 11 36 L: 9 35 • N ~ WESTBOUND CATALDa . 90 RAM ao Fq a-o 277 cP 224 ~ - M EAST'BOUND I-90 RAMPS ° ' N N 164 c:P ~ 8 . 358 386 37 33 a4~ ~ 0 ~ cr w Y ~ a NOT TO SCALE / ~ . I NLAND ~ FlGURE TURTLE CR'EEK_ b- ~CG~4~~.' PACIFIC 1998 TRAFFIC, INCLUDING ENGINEERING TURTLE CREEK AND 707 Wast 7th • Suite 200 (509) 458-684o MORNINGSIDE HEIGHTS TRAFFIC IMPACT'ANi4L' YSIS \ Spokane. wA sszoa F,vc: (sos) 458-6844, ~ P. M. P EAK H 0 U R