Loading...
2012, 06-26 Permit App: EGR-2012-0019 Land Disturbance Community Development Department (Staff Use Only) A " ' Permit Center SCITY kane 11703 East Sprague Avenue, Suite U y;d. n Spokane Valley,WA 99206 PERMIT No.: Tel: (509) 720-5240 Valley. Fax: (509) 688-0037 CHECKLIST?: ®Y ON Inn: LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT TIO N- 1 pi‘USE: Pro ect #_ 1(,( . ENGINEERED GRADING 0 REGULAR GRADING E] G Ei WPM G I APPLICANT USE: / JJ � SITE ADDRESS: 53 1 LP E . I L.�*) r,v.i tp 9 2 6 2012 2r 'il ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.: 3 6-0--LC/ , Cl J / g ccv f'Enwi{ - CENTC APPLICANT NAME: R Ca_ P tar,/T (,) . SUB # R-R E V. # PHONE: 50q-q21,-3302_ EMAIL: CD(,le i,C C(`l1 Yrra CELL: 50`7 3Z-t0-o I 4.1 Aid CONTACT NAME ( SAME AS APPLICANT): IG�41 Q/� �J�J 7n(i�n � 1 PHONE: EMAIL: CELL: PROPERTY OWNER NAME: 0 CHECK IF APPLICANT MAILING ADDRESS: „je h"/ A-letit j-) / 113 CITY:epty iu iht l.-L I_co, STATE: / 1 ZIP: C)c--1 a PHONE: "'--- EMAIL: CELL: CONTRACTOR NAME: (0 TBD): 0 CHECK IF APPLICANT -MAILING ADDRESS: #,,, CITY: Or- J2rz STATE: l!�/ 967,„9ZIP: cjI6, PHONE: qa -3 30Z EMAIL: �' iiii : STATE LIC. NO.: EXPIRES: UBI: DESCRIBE THE SCOPE OF WORK IN DETAIL AND INDICATE USE: AC'Jrt _f:,-) 9 1, ^ 4.-�-� X p__ V ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (CUBIC YD): CUT: FILL: 30 cl. IF CUT, PROVIDE DESTINATION OF SOIL: START DATE: 7 - a- ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: /7' 3-- / -- / /20 Updated March 2011 \\SV-FS2\Public Folders\Community Development\02 Administration\03 Forms-Official Versions\Permit Center\Land Disturbance Permit&Checklist 3- 29-11.doc LAND DISTURBANCE (LD) PERMIT CHECKLIST SCIT'il UE pokane For Grading, Clearing and Grubbing work outside the Right-of-Way(ROW) 00010 Valley (For work within ROW need a ROW permit) Permit Center♦ 11703 E Sprague Ave Suite 8-3•Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.688.0197♦ Fax: 509.688.0037♦ permitcenter®spokanevalley.org Lti Project Address: Today's Date: Project Description: Signature: Print Name: The purpose of this checklist is to gather information about the proposed project so to determine what land disturbance permit, if any, is required by the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Starting with Part 1 and working from top to bottom, please answer the following questions. The first"Yes" identifies the type of land disturbance (LD) permit required. PART 1 —I LD work exempted or already covered?(SVMC 24.50.020) If so then LD permit not needed. ❑Yes No Does your project only have to do with emergency utility work; cemetery graves; eliminating septic tanks; digging out a basement; building a wall less than 4 feet high; disposal of refuse that is covered under other regulations; already permitted mining, quarrying, stockpiling of aggregate material (rock, sand, gravel, aggregate, or clay) or exploratory excavations done under the direction of a licensed engineer or engineering geologists? If yes, then project exempted from a LD permit. PART 2naineered Grading Permit needed? (SVMC 24.50.030: 2 sets plans. calcs etc.from Engineer) ❑ Yes o Will this grading be for a short plat, subdivision or binding site plan? ID Yes '[d No Will any grading occur In a FEMA floodplain, wetland, wetland buffer, Fish and Wildlife habitat conservation area or geologically hazardous area? ❑Yeso Will the volume of excavation or fill for the project be over 500 cubic yards? (If checked Yes then a SEPA environmental checklist will need to be submitted for review) ❑ Yes Will the grading create a base or support for a permanent structure? EI2 Yes o Will the grading be for a driveway that is longer than 75 feet? ❑ Yes No Will any grading occur In a drainage channel or be for a water feature(like a perennial or Intermittent pond)with a surface area greater than 500 square feet? ❑ Yes No Will this grading result in the addition or replacement(excluding pavement maintenance)of 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces or the disturbance of 1 acre or more land or the construction of new drywells or other underground injection control (UIC)facilities? Yes ❑ No Will any excavations or fills have slopes at 2:1 (H:V) or steeper and heights greater than 21/ feet? ❑ Yes ❑ No Will any excavations or fills have slopes at 10:1 (H:V)or steeper and heights greater than 4 feet? PART 3—Regular Grading Permit needed?(SVMC 24.50.040; 1 set of plans showing grading and temporary erosion and sediment control: does not require engineering) IQ/Yes El No Will the volume of excavation or fill be over 50 cubic yards on any one lot? Yes ❑ No Will any excavations have slopes at 2:1 (H:V) or steeper or heights greater than 3 feet? ❑ Yes El No Will any fills have slopes at 2:1 (H:V) or steeper or heights greater than 2 feet? PART 4—Grubbing and Clearing(G&C) Permit needed?(SVMC 24.50.050; 1 set of plans showing G&C and temporary erosion and sediment control; does not reaulre engineering) ❑ Yes ❑ No Will the G&C work disturb 5,000 or more square feet of area or remove 7 or more trees? (Note that forest practices overseen by DNR or commercial agriculture are exempt) ❑ Yes El No Will there be any clearing on slopes or near/in FEMA floodplains,wetlands, wetland buffers, Fish and Wildlife habitat conservation areas, geologically hazardous areas or erodible soils? If the answers to all of the questions above are "No"then a permit is not required for the proposed work. ALLWESTMaterials Testing Geotechnical Engineering Testing & Engineering Environmental Services May 29, 2012 Project No. 212-070G F >_���ZOIZ— 00["7 Project _ RECEIVED Mr. Ryan Yeoman Rock Placing Company JUN 2 6 2012 14115 East Trent Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99216 CSV PERMIT CENTER SUB # i REV. # Re: Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation Proposed Boulder Retaining Walls 5316 East 16th Avenue Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Yeoman: ALLWEST Testing & Engineering (ALLWEST) has completed the geotechnical engineering evaluation for the proposed boulder retaining wall at the above-referenced site in Spokane, Washington. The purpose of our services was to formulate recommendations for design to assist you in preparation of plans and specifications for construction. This report summarizes the results of our analysis, opinions, and recommendations. PROJECT DESCRIPTION We understand that the proposed retaining walls will consist of terraced boulder gravity walls having two terraces retaining the native soils and/or structural fill. The minimum distance between the walls will be 10 feet. We understand that the exposed wall height for each individual wall will range up to approximately 5 feet at the highest point. The ground surface above each wall will be relatively flat. The ground surface below the lower wall will range from relatively flat to a maximum of 4:1 (horizontal to vertical). 690 W. Capstone Court• Hayden, ID 83835 • (208) 762-4721 • Fax (208) 762-0942 12928 E. Indiana Avenue #1 •Spokane Valley, WA 99216 • (509) 534-4411 • Fax (509) 534-9326 2127 2nd Avenue N. • Lewiston, ID 83501 • (208) 743-5710 • Fax (208) 743-8270 Ge -hnical Engineering Evaluation .,,„ posed Boulder Retaining Walls 5316 East 16th Avenue Spokane,Washington Project No.212-070G Page 2 AVAILABLE INFORMATION An engineer from our staff visited the site on April 30, 2012 to observe the exposed soil and ground surface conditions at the site. At the time of our visit, excavation into the slope had not been made. The exposed soils on the slope consisted of silty sands with some gravel. Granitic bedrock was exposed in several areas. GENERAL SOIL CONDITIONS Based on our research of the USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soil maps, the on-site soils have been mapped as Spokane very rocky complex (StC, see Figure 2). The Spokane soils are described as a moderately shallow, well drained soil that formed in weathered granite or glacial till overlying granite bedrock. Based on observations made during the site visit, the soils at the site appear to be consistent with the NRCS data. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Design Data We understand that the proposed retaining walls will consist of terraced boulder gravity walls having two terraces retaining the native soils and/or structural fill. We understand that the exposed wall height for each individual wall will range up to approximately 5 feet at the highest point. The ground surface above each wall will be relatively flat. The ground surface below the lower wall will range from relatively flat to a maximum of 4:1 (horizontal to vertical). We analyzed a boulder retaining wall section having a maximum exposed height of 5 feet. We anticipate that on-site soils or granular fill will be used to backfill the walls. We analyzed the retaining walls using boulders having general dimensions ranging from four-man rock at the wall bases to two- or three-man rock at the tops of the walls. We used a 14-degree (1:4 horizontal to vertical) batter from vertical for analysis. Assuming the soil types as encountered during our site visit, we used the following strength parameters for design: Unit Weight, Soil Type Angle of Internal Cohesion, pounds I pounds per cubic Friction, degrees per square foot foot Foundation 30 0 125 Retained 30 0 125 Infill 1 __- 30 0 125 Materials Testing ALLWEST Geotechnical Engineering Testing & Engineering Environmental Services Ge' -hnical Engineering Evaluation „posed Boulder Retaining Walls 5316 East 16th Avenue Spokane,Washington Project No.212-070G Page 3 Stability Analysis Using the previously mentioned strength parameters, we performed a global stability analysis of the slope using Bishop's method of slices to calculate the minimum factor of safety. The calculations were performed using XSTABL°software on a personal computer. The software is based on a computer program developed for the Federal Highway Administration by Purdue University. For a two-terraced wall with 5-foot maximum exposed wall heights with a relatively flat ground surface above the upper wall and a 4:1 (horizontal to vertical) slope below the lower wall, the factor of safety we calculated was 1.522 (see Figure 3). For stability, a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 is typically considered to be adequate. Based on this analysis, it is our opinion that the slope will be stable after construction of the walls. Design Sections To assist us in our analysis and design, we evaluated the wall sections with SRWaIITM (version 3.22) computer software, which was created by the National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA) for analyzing segmental retaining walls. We analyzed sections for exposed wall heights up to 5 feet and evaluated them under static loading conditions. Based on our analysis, we recommend installation of four-man rock at the base of the walls. Foundation Preparation We recommend that the lowest course of boulders be installed a minimum depth of 1 foot below grade as measured at the face of the walls. This embedment depth is recommended to provide the necessary bearing capacity for the wall foundations, provide for adequate global stability, and to resist sliding along the wall bases. The boulders should be placed on a level pad of compacted crushed gravel, sandy gravel, or quarry spalls. We recommend that the leveling pad be a minimum of 6 inches thick, extend 6 inches out from the face of the wall, and be a minimum of 4 to 6 feet wide depending on the size of the lowest course of boulders. We recommend that the crushed gravel, sandy gravel, or quarry spall leveling pad be placed in a loose lift of 6 to 8 inches and be compacted to a firm and unyielding condition. Topsoil extending to depths beyond excavation for the leveling pad should be completely removed before placement of structural fill. Where bedrock is present, the embedment depth and/or thickness of the gravel leveling pad could be reduced or eliminated provided that the bedrock surface is shaped to slope back into the retained slope. Materials Testing ALLWEST Geotechnical Engineering Testing & Engineering Environmental Services Ge -Mica! Engineering Evaluation Sosed Boulder Retaining Walls 5316 East 16th Avenue Spokane,Washington Project No.212-070G Page 4 Backfill and Fill We recommend that fill placed within 12 inches of the backs of the walls consist of a permeable, free-draining material such as quarry spalls or sandy gravel having less than 5 percent by weight passing a 200 sieve. This permeable fill is necessary to reduce the potential for water to build up behind the walls. We recommend placing a non-woven, water-permeable geotextile separator fabric behind the free-draining aggregate to reduce the potential for migration of native and fill soils through the drainage aggregate and the wall faces. Retaining Wall Drainage Draintile should be placed at a location just behind the lowest course of boulders behind each wall to remove water from behind the walls. The draintile should outlet at the lowest point of the walls down-gradient of the toe of the lower wall. Additional Services Recommended We recommend that ALLWEST Testing & Engineering be retained to provide construction observations to verify the soil and geologic conditions and that the report recommendations are incorporated into the actual construction. If we are not retained to provide the recommended construction observation services, we cannot be responsible for soil engineering related construction errors or omissions, nor can we provide any opinions regarding conformance of the construction to the recommendations contained in this report. REPORT LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared to assist in the design and construction of the proposed boulder retaining walls at 5316 East 16th Avenue in Spokane, Washington. Our services consist of professional opinions and conclusions made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices at the time of this report in this local area. This acknowledgement is in lieu of all warranties either expressed or implied. Materials Testing ALLWEST Geotechnical Engineering Testing & Engineering Environmental Services Ge 'Finical Engineering Evaluation osed Boulder Retaining Walls 5316 East 15th Avenue Spokane,Washington Project No.212-070G Page 5 REMARKS It has been a pleasure being of service to you on this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call us at (509) 534-4411 at your convenience. Sincerely, ALLWEST Testing & Engineering, LLC �o Utl1�,Q c Andy J. Eliason, P.E. � � ~„ °„N Project Engineer /4` j, ' F�a JSP Paul T. Nelson, P.E. �,. .- -�62 %X., Senior Geotechnical Engineer u Es://-; -�3 Attachments: Figure 1, Site Location Map Figure 2, NRCS Map Figure 3, Slope Stability Cross Section Figure 4, Wall Cross Section Materials Testing ALLWEST Geotechnical Engineering Testing & Engineering Environmental Services mRegularGradingor Grubbi g and Clearing - Si Plan � For requirements,see �SCITY :..: pokane Spokane Valley Municipal Code r Chapter 24.50 4000.Valley LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES Arrow Pointing to North: Project # Permit Number: Parcel Number: Today's Date: RECEIVE I —ate-\� 4--------. .,. 4 27 2012 Street Address: -Jt � S - `�+L-. � e_ csv PERMIT(~ IT CENTER Property owner: Applicant: Mc0 r()CAcvty►vv gPL Lk_c_ SUB # = REV. it,..L Plan Preparers Onsite Contact: - — ,jats2—CD\ {— 1)For Regular Grading or Grubbing and Clearing: A)Show on the site plan: 0 Adjacent or nearest streets 0 Footprints of buildings and i In Property boundaries structures -1 I Boundary of work area 0 Known utilities 1=-a4.4_, Arrows pointing downslope before work begins The approximate location of all trees 8-inches in diameter at breast „ ,__, sT"_:LT c� AC- height(dbh)and larger, and a description of the tree protection '' standards to be implemented during construction. B)Temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC)-show on site plan: -�-” ® Silt fence at downslope portions of project(see detail) ® Protection of drainage structures onsite or in the street to keep dirtI/ 7" s from getting in (see detail example) 4.-3"..:-L-1- `'EN Lt ® Locations where concrete trucks will get washed out I V d RECEIVED 2)For Regular Grading,additionally show on the site plan: CSV Development Engineerin Arrows pointing to what will be downslope after work is done ja'Delineate which areas are cut and which are fill ��N 2'7 2012 gWhat is the vertical height of maximum: 714i • Cut slope feet f`_"' pro ect# • Fill slope 5 t feet _ EL_ b N Name " Note: ! Submittal #......J • All erosion prevention and sediment control measures shall be installed before grading or grubbing and clearing begins and these measures need to be maintained for the extent of the project, including replacement and repair as needed.The applicant is • TCeeS responsible for confining all soil on the project site and adding other measures as necessary to accommodate changing or unexpected site and weather conditions. (see. imat pIidiota star f(�} ' • Inspect all roadways adjacent to the construction access route(s) at lsw4 the end of each day. If sediment has been tracked off site then cleaning(streets and drainage structures) is required. • The Contractor shall protect adjacent properties, control dust and remove all construction related debris to an approved waste disposal r site. CALL 2 BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE YOU DIGI - CircleScale used: T City Use Only- : Date: 811 OR 1-800-424-5555 • 1".101 1"=20' 1"=30' 1'-40 1"=50' 1'1=60' 1".1001"x 1" Grid Reviewed for completeness by: Silt Fence Detail ` Inlet Protection Example Joints in filter fabric shall be spliced at posts.Use staples,wire rings or R . Plan ViewA equivalent to attach fabric to sts 2x2 by 14 Oa.wire or po equivalent,if standard Drain strength fabric used _ grate � „ ,___'*4/10&04,41.--`''yevo...4. 4A • I a izs�, .6. a ” ' .I I .+5 i.. • • �' ate. 1. •I I Filter fabric r ., .0 00 r r, 4.4: 8 sp ik. 41 I I I •6 t? .ted' •' x o .OTh U t' wtA6 4 c a .'tel I I I Concrete I Ia-. 'N.)tife, :a In nnn n .�'�' ` - _1' r--I��.I i i��'.fl - zr,„, - i I Imo--6'max •-I I Minimum ■ 4" l • l�u E- _4xtrench .� : iri 1 j / I Backfill trench with native soil ;� ,cN el; _, 11 [111{1117_ +,( r. Post spacing may be increased or 3/4"-1.5"washed gravel .— ;'�, o i-oa,,•.• . ` r * ,® Gravel to 8'if wire backing is used ° y ;,;�#• 2"x2ft wood posts,steel fence a �. , Eerl'lill Figure 73.2®o Silt Fence posts,or equivalent4M4-1).•& ; , ¢�a e9 ,� -� , v, } I -' " , --f-yo.5.19-b-40\3-st,.% y . ,.... :11-).... 4.'' .). .74* ;fit; o iN A Section A - A Concrete Elf k-\ Wire Screen or ' Filter Fabric Gravel Hack tfil—A Overtl•ovi Water Pandit-1g PIT. � � f VI{ . -- Water „Acme _� '£17 ; ■ Ati _ "Riii� TJ PE:. A1,2-�JJ�tefJ X11 ' K f A`; , /‹ ‹. Flet , `, ;d\e/ 1 1.0 Notes: 1.Drop inlet sediment barriers are to be used for small,nearly level drainage areas.(less than 5%) 2.Excavate a basin of sufficient size adjacent to the drop inlet. ,t 3.The top of the structure(ponding height)must be well below the ground elevation downslope to prevent runoff from h/i i +I0 �4 T.ls�1 /Ir R' osiQg a inlet.A� rary dace may be necessary on the downslope side of the structure. Figure 7.3.15- Block and Gravel Filter , i I 1,, 10'MINIMUM HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN BACK FACE OF LOWER WALL AND FRONT FACE OF UPPER WALL. GROUND SURFACE 2T03MAN ). ' ^ ,. r ti X X ~ \....)_...1- ROCK ;I,iit Y 0 alilb,a.04. at iiit ` \ AGGREGATE i • • �. �. �. .��.} ` /\ DRAINAGE 'r��+. �.�•�•�•�•� COMPACTED STRUCTURAL - �` 14° �-� ��.'7�..40+0C FILL OR NATIVE SOILS eo.�si`/ j LAYER 5'MAXIMUM 3 TO 4 MAN 1,i�' ornare. / 4 (TYP.) j 12"MINIMUM WIDTH EXPOSED ROCK '-�1 ^ ' ^ -At.- ��`j HEIGHT . ► •r.op.�.or.er.v'ipv.�o`i�'�el,��+upi'„-/` 1/ IP j 'j��mts ` NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC o11, 40 0 `//`` i 11;11474': I��� (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT) •• o- / 4MAN ROCK � ...��..� 1 / 2TO3 -�i,� v��'� r %'ir f�.go►�+�r'ktr�'G0i����C iG �.'�r ___.---____----- IV MAN ROCK �f.�� �r �►�'`!`..Y%� �; " .e �� �� .� �� r� \-:_---____\_\:___:- , 4 I !'Ii , �� .� .* t o 0 0 0 5'MAXIMUM 3 TO 4 �� d • • INIMUM i. • • ��•�•���•�•a•�•�•�•^ EXPOSED I •. ./ ti...... ..L...�+`or....�.!�..�e.•'►my+•�!• ��/`,`//`` HEIGHT [ MAN ROCK iI+�>� BEDMENT �.;�,;� \ /\\ \.� \\/ I !' - yam)ou v\✓ o�0..41. o� 0�'MINIMUM 4"DIAMETER - -k — ��i— j '*iv ► o • -f o� s �� o PERFORATED DRAINTILE TO .1.077.„--- \..�i'�\\ - \\\ �,� j �Ii_! ���,�. 0 0 0 10! APPROVED DISCHARGE ..�� ���� `/ `/` ---- • ! 4 MAN ROCK ��i !�Gii.��'�r �. • • • • • ♦ . 4. \ , /\\ —\'� \ // -"' �� 7. �a ' NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 0 0 0 \...„--- \�/,``/` \\ RFACE !. o o (MIRAFI 140N OR EQUIVALENT) •�•���•�•� SU -� V/iIV�.�..i� /'-�` NATI-VE SOILS ,�� MAX UM SLOPED �Ar"""1:.•=ii 7,1'.-: ie'. . .10 0 41 la►.ow 0 :, ti� ri! �� P110t.� \ "/ - ` , 1V �M 1.0'MINIMUM i� // + 'i \' /% \ \---\\_____\ /% ` . 41- /\\ `1 \ `/\ ` `,`//`\V.----A______\ ` 1, �`\// EMBEDM T \ —`� //``\�� \\/ �\_ \ //`1`/ `\`/ t �/\ \ �� MINIMUM 4"DIAMETER \\1�--/ /11 // MINIMUM 6"THICK,4'-6'WIDE(DEPENDING ON \ /\ PERFORATED DRAINTILE TO`�\-\\`/` \\�\` //```\ \_- \/ — BOULDER SIZE)COMPACTED,CRUSHED GRAVEL,i `// APPROVED DISCHARGE` \ /- //- moi/ \\...-______- _V..........._ \\ SANDY GRAVEL,OR QUARRY SPALLS i /\` t ---\\------___.__ ` \ \\\- , LEVELING PAD EXTENDING \/`\\//`,`/`%` \\ - ,-- ``����\``//\\`' :` \\V-_—_--_—. `_ 6"OUT FROM THE�\E\VI!WAL\.'\i``/. ,. \----- `\��```�`\1\`�\,` `�`\,�/``` ' / NOTE: LEVELING PAD TO BE COMPACTED TO A FIRM AND UNYIELDING CONDITION TITLE: BOULDER RETAINING WALL 0' TOTAL MAXIMUM EXPOSED HEIGHT) AlI.L1NEST (1 SCALE: DATE: PROJECT#: HAYDEN&LEWISTON,IDAHO&SPOKANE,WASHINGTON FIGURE 4 NONE MAY 29,2012 212-070G (208)762-4721(208)743-5710 (509)534-4411 Figure 3 212-070G 5-16-12 16:01 Manning Retaining Wall 120 _ 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.522 114 _ 7D108 _ a) X < 102 _ 96 _ 90 0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48,. X—AXIS (feet) Slope Stability Cross Section Designed By: PTN Proposed Boulder Retaining Walls Project 212-070G ALLWEST 1316 East 16th Avenue May 29, 2012 Testlnp & Engineering Spokane, Washington Figure 1 ' . r #ir :.e 11 1 �....', Ft I r-,;y s.\l ( . f-- /I(- (N-- -'",..\( 11 \\'' 1°\ C%( ) %)' / i . , Gy. . - ,i 1 v., i/ ''' )) ir = ji-- 1,, _ ,fes.. L SITE ‘,/,,,r ..*-3.-... ,,,:"".....,y" ... - - , ----. 7re-7p .. i - ) '� . lam; I r . , , tom.f�i_`� / ����■ 1 r1: / II- I f , ( •a t\'- 'fell 111 d D i )4114 i "Raf•t • `!�_ • I * p ' "Sl a " r kle\ '1 ! 0 IA 41 * / Si 1 I r k1 \ I p yvl .6 .1111 � . V)/1) 4 4 Site Location Map Designed By: PTN Proposed Boulder Retaining Project No. 212-070G Walls �� 5316 East 16th Avenue ALLWEST May 29, 2012 Testing 8ming Spokane, Washington Project # E 1---a.1Z - 0011i RECEIVED JUN 2 6 2012 I CSV PERMIT CENTER I SUB # Fri REV. # r T -.R. -1 ---4,, et A 6 ilis j 14> ii. a Q I 1.0 - IN ... / V 1 Illb qt. 1 7 Q I bi 5 1 I it 1 ► , i 0 ii . i d 5 .s,. a. 1 11111111111111111 tom' ° 2-$01 s Project E&92-7-6i2-C�U1 ECEIVED JL" 262012 CSV PERMIT CENTER SUB- REV, n CA a1 Figure 2 AL i _ _II / ,' / t V I s 154,,p/04 4,,i,k '''. • � 1 i "_ IJ l I SITE i l. • 4w ii 0 Et s NRCS Map Designed By: PTN Proposed Boulder Retaining Project No. 212-070G Walls ALLWEST 5316 East 16th Avenue May 29, 2012 Testing & ,ing Spokane, Washington a 'if :,,� I irk '" ! vilw „_ •vit.r • '`..F' 4� EA; _ moi • . If Iz t r .,wry, 1 '• •, t - ., .r 1 + i bb ? - V '! ' /" f.'. • �, ,* J • • r :____ 0„. „:1 6..To 0 • 41 q y •aclik A , r'r 4. ' y ilk' ! • -, litistos {, , IIMMIV "' !til il ,�, ..:1 - =. . .Ai �"rl� � x ,; 11NNIIIMM44111110.411111.0 ..., ..0 r i' , ate° i r4 '1"11. . . Y r R, Olf ♦ ,,, 71. I'' ' / • 49�. „..,:if, �' 4 4 �e :, '14'0 lri ° t ' r611 '' ii II' ~� 4” r • 4 ' 4 / R4�ip AEA ,' * ti f , ' « +br �' � •,`, f Q 00) • ,.:,,,:‘,*it '''..i , r 4'' I I l f AAAkkk & , itift ' , i "., A: \ 1 \ 6 ,i i h' EGR-2012-0019 - Rock Place - 5316 E 16th - 35261.9118 Legend City of Spokane Valley 0 BPA Easement 1106 35234.9007 / 41 ''� ,: Yellowstone Pipeline 3521845 //, "- .1 /; /7 r / yg / / <,/ Condos and other Vertical Unit / 35261.1841 j 35261.90011 �V/ '� ��/ . �/ ' �� f = �/'� /� ❑ Ground Floor or Leased Landa �/ w/ �� w / /�• / /� Other Floors ,�',/ , N. :. 61.1840,,/j ❑ Parcels ,®, / / / 35261.18'3 Al"'1 rt / r / 40 / / t� #1 / 2010 Countywide Imagery �.� v 1.a0, 7 •• ,�, /.' © Red Band_t ./, / 1`' / © Green:Band_2 //4:////1 / w Blue: Band_3 / /// 4 j'/ it... „d 35261.1839 .a 1 frier:, // j ' ,/ 35261.1802 �f on ; uu .a35261.1838/ ,//////''‘,,, /7T /V//. / +-• ///j �, ,/,/.. I 0. '35261:1837.1' ;!, / ../ VIP 4,1 ' OQQaQ dG�66Q, 35261:1803 /OA�'NE',VAS t 35261.9063 / /�/;. in:, �/ j/ �// ////// /! /- 35261:1836 �GEOBCOMs,„ 1804 /, ,�/' il / / f/ ',//,/;/// 1 35261.1835// � X ' / ern 0r / / �, I/ //.,,14%a'''' 1"y'p.;'/ °' '' r+/Fri 000.4 e"',°e�`'), / Notes 2614809 /f:/_,7":,/,./.7,-"/„.,;„::,/,/,/,,,,,,-/,/ t„� -- rn / / /`�z Enter Map Description ---,of'\;#‘$ A - °).. / . 7 ..-,s - '-4,4,---, ./ //s, ,000- / / , ,4"/,,,,, illA / i 35261:1846 "/ ,, t✓ ckt. '" 40,,, ,c„.40' } / 35261.1815 ��: / , / / 526E1814 / // , 2 /%/'1%////%: i1, 232.1 0 116.05 232.1 Feet O This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. 6 , SCIMAP �---' N 735234 777; > Asa "/I/ tip° • 1 �� leesaw J 547 �: 55v 2� /itis % 7 35231.07;,: t ,, 340602:. gg // ✓ 0 3"57�/�a9 1 35234.0710 "1511. _' •, 2150.-.'2150' 116U / • �• 35234.9005 �', 35234.9007 r/`� rY tip, I 'f 35261841 0 \t 0 r �x � 1203 //J / .4, J-,-, ,. ,�- ,,j ._ „•� ,r 35261.1401 1604, +l- 5203,fL� / F " � �•,` f y . _ � f// 352619008` /// ///''-aa•.��� "----- -- '� _ t 1 f .t 531 .+5"a+5322 , 16oz ✓`'lcpz til 35261.I. >1 11 r 5123 ,.t d c 5322 d rit, a �yp� � y 181` ♦ d. ' /, / / ,. . 0 35261.9106 r} 35261.9107 t. .. r t •,�it".�„ t ,� `�' , 1402 r �r,, ""� _____;.. 1, /'-`-".-'` "^-�'�`�� \- '� i .:�` / t 3 261 ,1i '. \ - 1 1�� a _. �--. .�-.r 4,,, i..1 5 _ uv� 1 ":45:" tom �� \ \ -....„:,....„---„..., ,,_...,.._ 4..z..\\\\\ , i —ll ____ `!-�.-�. ,._,.. 1 1616 1 -„ 1 �� '` \ " ... I/ �� 1616 afyt >, 7616. . a,-----, - ti ti `Pi //,rJ/�►// ' � ,c'`'35261 802.. � . 1 , �>� _352611403 le„,. . rte” t / '11---. 1 : """.. .M C,,":;','.:-22,V777''-.'1',._: yV ' 617 ,11 kckciAtkl 71, 1,1,14 . 740. ll )� ///,'/„int > 5316 �: , 5720 / �1 ''15,4,,,?,/ , ' /,---- y,,,I, if,,b,-44"4%, N., 4. I ./. 1 '/ / '-/ ` / I f 35261:917•/ 5316 ,� 7626 ^.� ' 1 „ .• i • Il / fr 1I 35261.9119 5206,7/ + / �"�� \ 111 A / r�: 3szci' 22o0 0 / • ' a" ',.•�° �- — '"•`" ) \!1111f( , 17p7 h :ryr —"^'" 1707-I '� �t • • ``� -I' �� 35261.3804 `="z —" ' , 111 \ ~ r � ��. i 352611835 1715 s.�. .. / 1 ,,.,..,,...1s , 35261/ / / / / / / / (,—, .'N., ' /I I • . , , \ \ _.,,,, 4::"./... ',' I_ -_----:- - - ..- I 35261'1834 727/r '.` I F}T4�M'"" ;.. ri5373.1 5401 ,w:. r,., ill ` ,15 35261'1808 35261807 •- r .1727 - 7 f 5307 .e1 w +}.r t r,1__ • _ .y&i _.9� / „6$A.'4irifi' {a �4' t r'rta.,�' 1 ;s ':."`: 1 - �:./ �. 153 2 / 9 76159 153.2 Feet This map is a user generated static output From an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current or othetvrse reliable. O